Datasets:

anonymousdatasets

/

arxiv-physics

like 1

arXiv:physics/0004073v1 [physics.atom-ph] 28 Apr 2000The Exchange-correlation Hole of the Si Atom, A Quantum Mont e Carlo Study Antonio C. Cancio∗and C. Y. Fong Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 J. S. Nelson Semiconductor Physics Division, Sandia National Laborato ries, Albuquerque, NM 87185-5800 (Submitted to Physical Review A) We have studied the exchange-correlation hole nxcand pair correlation function in the valence shell of the Si atom in its3P ground state, using highly accurate Slater-Jastrow wavef unctions and the Variational Monte Carlo method. The exchange-correlat ion hole shows a number of interesting features caused by the open shell structure of Si, including a marked transition from efficient to poor screening behavior as a test majority-spin electron is move d from the center of a valence porbital onto the axis perpendicular to the occupied porbitals. This behavior results from the dramatic difference in the exchange hole in the two cases, which is part ially compensated by a corresponding anisotropy in the correlation hole. In addition we observe a n anisotropic change in the spin density induced by Coulomb correlation, reducing the spatial overl ap between the different spin-components of the density and contributing to the anisotropy of the corr elation hole. The exclusion effect correlation, in which a 3 s2→3p2substitution excitation is allowed along the unoccupied ax is and prohibited along the other axes, was found to have a noticeab le effect on the correlation hole and is partially accountable for its anisotropy; however, it is in consistent with the observed changes in spin density. In contrast to the longer range features, we find tha t the “on-top” correlation hole is well described by linear density functional theory, for a large r ange of local density and magnetization. PACS numbers: 31.25.Eb, 31.10.+z, 71.15.-m, 02.70.Lq I. INTRODUCTION An understanding of the exchange-correlation hole and related quantities such as the pair correlation function and exchange-correlation energy is an important factor in the systematic development of accurate density func- tional theory (DFT) methods for quantum chemistry and solid state physics [1]. Much progress has been made in understanding the pair correlation function in the homo- geneous electron gas or jellium, using accurate numeri- cal techniques [2,3] and analytic modeling [4]. Although the closely related Coulomb hole has long been studied in atomic and molecular systems [5–7], the quantitative understanding of correlation holes in inhomogeneous sys- tems is far from complete. In recent years there have been several efforts to fill the gaps, with a focus on character- izing properties closely tied to the development of den- sity functional theories, such as the on-top hole [8,9] and system-averaged exchange and correlation holes [8,10]. In much of the previous work on the exchange- correlation hole in atoms and molecules, the focus has been on two electron systems and closed-shell atoms such as Be and Ne, with additional studies of more compli- cated molecules such as N 2and H 2O [7]. One class of systems that has received less attention is that of open- shell atoms. The valence shell of such an atom may con- sist only of a few electrons about a radially symmetric core, but with a degenerate ground state and the cor- responding valence-shell structure, have interesting andquite complex features in its exchange-correlation hole. In particular, in the case of less-than-half filling, these include the exclusion-effect correlations involving three or more electrons [11]. Modeling such systems requires proper attention both to orbital correlations best treated in a configuration interaction (CI) context and to dy- namic correlations more amenable to a density functional description. The application of density functional the- ory to open-shell systems is an active area of research, with the question of the optimal treatment of degenerate ground states and of the formation of such atoms into molecules giving rise to intriguing problems [12]. Recently, Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) meth- ods combining highly accurate trial wavefunctions with Monte Carlo methods for evaluating ground state ener- gies and wavefunctions have been developed and applied to atoms and molecules [13–15]. The wavefunctions used in these calculations have the advantage of being simple and compact, typically recovering 85% or more of the correlation energy of atoms and the dissociation ener- gies of molecules with a few trial parameters. Unlike configuration interaction expansions they can describe with equal ease both “nondynamic” correlations and “dy- namic” correlations such as the short-range cusp condi- tion [16]. These features make this method a natural candidate for studying electron correlations, and it has been employed in recent studies of the pair correlation function in crystalline Si [17,18]. In this paper we study the exchange-correlation hole 1and pair correlation function of the valence shell of the Si atom with the VMC method. A quantitative knowl- edge of correlations in Si is important in improving DFT predictions for the cohesive energy, binding energies and surface characteristics for this and related technologica lly important materials. The Si atom is in its own right a useful laboratory for the study of electron correlations, with both local jellium-like and the nonlocal chemical properties due to the open shell structure of the atom playing important roles in determining the relevant phys- ical and chemical properties. The paper is organized as follows: Sec. II provides theoretical background on the exchange-correlation hole, Sec. III gives details of the sy s- tem studied and of the calculational method. Results for the exchange-correlation hole are given in Sec. IV, for the pair correlation function in Sec. V and for correla- tion effects on the spin density in Sec. VI. We close with a summary of the results and conclusion in Sec. VII. II. THE EXCHANGE CORRELATION HOLE The exchange-correlation hole, including explicit spin dependence, is defined as: nxc(r0,σ0;r,σ) =n(2)(r0,σ0;r,σ) n(r0,σ0)−n(r,σ).(1) Physically it describes the change in density at rand for spin component σfrom its mean value, n(r,σ), given the presence of another electron with spin σ0at position r0. The quantity n(2)(r0,σ0;r,σ) is the pair density, the expectation in the ground state of finding a pair of elec- trons at two given coordinates. It is defined in terms of an expectation of the ground state as: n(2)(r0,σ0;r,σ) =/summationdisplay i,j/negationslash=i/angb∇acketleftδ(r0−ri)δσ0σiδ(r−rj)δσσj/angb∇acket∇ight. (2) A closely related quantity, the pair correlation function g(r0,σ0,r,σ), is a measure of the pair density relative to that expected for uncorrelated electrons with the same density distribution: g(r0,σ0;r,σ) =n(2)(r0,σ0;r,σ) n(r0,σ0)n(r,σ). (3) The importance of the exchange-correlation hole to den- sity functional theory lies in its connection [19,20] to the exchange-correlation energy Exc: Exc=1 2/integraldisplay d3rn(r)/integraldisplay d3r′/integraldisplay1 0dλnxc(r,r′,λ) |r−r′|.(4) Herenxc(r,r′,λ) is the exchange-correlation hole, summed over spins, for the system with scaled Coulomb interaction λe2, with an external potential altered so thatthe density of the system remains unchanged. The in- tegration over coupling constant strength λaccounts for the kinetic energy cost of correlating electrons, weakenin g the strength of the integrated nxcwith respect to its value atλ=1. Although Excis in principle determined from a knowledge of the single particle density alone, this depen- dence is in general not easy to determine beyond the local density approximation. The exchange-correlation hole has a wealth of features which may be used to test and improve theoretical models of the exchange-correlation energy. As a result, many attempts to systematically improve density functional theory have this function as a starting point [1,21–23]. In this paper, we will discuss the full coupling-constant (λ=1) case for nxc. Although the coupling-constant inte- grated quantity is most directly connected to the density functional theory, the full coupling-constant case is inte r- esting in itself, as its average is an experimentally mea- surable expectation of the ground state [24]. It is also an essential ingredient in modern hybrid methods which combine elements of density functional theories and con- ventional Hartree-Fock methods [22]. The quantity nxc is often analyzed by a decomposition into an exchange component, nx, corresponding to the λ= 0 or noninter- acting system, which describes the correlations between particles arising from the Pauli exclusion principle, and a correlation component, nc, determined by taking the difference between the fully interacting and noninteract- ing cases, which describes the additional correlation due to the Coulomb interaction between electrons [25]. We study the explicit spin decomposition of nxc. This choice is useful for understanding the correlation response of an open-shell atom for which the ground state has nontrivial differences in its spin components. Spin decomposition falls roughly along the lines of exchange and correlation: exchange affects only particles with the same spin, and Coulomb correlations, though also present in the same- spin case, are most noticeable in the opposite-spin chan- nel. Some initial insight into the nature of the exchange- correlation hole in atoms and other finite systems can be obtained by considering limiting cases. The exchange- correlation hole about a reference electron in the ho- mogeneous electron gas is isotropic, that is, a function solely of the distance from the electron, and localized about the electron with a radius determined by the aver- age interelectron distance. Consequently, in a system of slowly varying density, the the local density approxima- tion (LDA) holds, in which the hole is determined by the density (or each spin-component of the density if these are different) at the location of the reference electron and “moves” with the position of the reference electron. In atoms or molecules, important correlation effects often involve a pair excitation from the noninteracting ground- state into a finite number of lowlying, perhaps nearly de- generate, excited states. In this case, the resulting corre - lation hole is dependent on the shape of the ground-state orbitals vacated and the excited-state orbitals occupied 2and is largely unsensitive to the position of the reference electron. In real systems, the exchange-correlation hole will contain aspects of both limiting cases, with those that “move” with the position of the electron termed “dynamic” correlations and the orbital correlations in- sensitive to electron position termed “nondynamic”. In open-shell atoms both play important roles. III. CALCULATION APPROACH A. Correlated description of the Si atom We focus on correlations in the valence shell of the atom with the core electrons replaced by norm- conserving ab initio nonlocal pseudopotentials derived from LDA calculations [26]. In this case the valence shell of the atom is described by the Hamiltonian H=/summationdisplay i ∇2 i 2m+/summationdisplay li,miVli(ri)|limi><l imi|  +/summationdisplay i<je2 |ri−rj|(5) where the sums are over the valence electrons. Vlis the nonlocal pseudopotential and |limi><l imi|the single particle projection operator onto the state with total an- gular momentum liandz-axis projection mi. The final term is the intravalence Coulomb interaction. The Si atom has a nine-fold degenerate (3 s23p2)3P ground state. By maximizing the spin projection, this state can be represented by a single Slater determinant, consisting of a majority-spin component, here chosen to be spin up, with one 3 sand two 3porbitals, and a mi- nority or down-spin component with one 3 selectron. There then remain two angular momentum projections that lead to physically significant differences in nxc. The ml=0 projection has pxandpyorbitals and a “pancake” like shape, while the ml=±1 projections have a “cigar” shape, with p0andp±orbitals. This distinction does not play a role in determining Excfor an atom, given the in- variance of the energy to rotations of the atom. The pres- ence of a quantization axis in the formation of a Si bond breaks this invariance, so that the projection-specific be- havior ofnxcbecomes important in determining accurate molecular binding energies. It thus should be useful as a test of density functional theory, which typically overes- timates binding energies by about 1 eV [1,10]. Results in this paper focus on the ml=0 projection which provides a clear comparison between the situation perpendicular to and parallel to the porbitals, though calculations were done on the other projection for comparison. To calculate the exchange-correlation hole variation- ally we start with a Slater-Jastrow trial wavefunction ψ=exp(−F)/productdisplay σDσ, (6)withDσbeing a Slater determinant for spin component σandFa Jastrow correlation factor. All single-particle orbitals are obtained from the same local DFT program that determined our pseudopotentials. We use a Boys and Handy form [14,27] for F, which includes electron- electron, electron-nucleus and electron-electron-nucle us correlations expanded in a basis set of correlation func- tions: F=/summationdisplay l,m,nclmn/summationdisplay i/negationslash=j(¯rl i¯rm j+ ¯rm i¯rl i)¯rn ij. (7) The basis functions are ¯ ri=bri/(1 +bri) and ¯rij= drij/(1 +drij), whererijis the distance between a pair of electrons, riis the distance between electron iand the atom center. The terms b,dandclmnare variational parameters. The lowest order ¯ rijterm is set separately for opposite and same-spin electron correlations to satisf y the short range electron-electron cusp condition [16] for each case. Higher order terms treat longer range effects and are determined without distinguishing electron spin. Electron-ion terms in the correlation function correct for the tendency of interelectron correlations to expand the volume of the atom and provide density-dependent cor- rections to the electron-electron correlation [14]. Since the valence shell of Si is less than half-filled, orbital or nondynamic correlations may be important [11]. These can be incorporated with a multideterminant extension of the Slater-Jastrow wavefunction: ψ=exp(−F)/summationdisplay αηα/productdisplay σDα σ. (8) B. Method of Calculation The Variational Monte Carlo method [28] is used to calculate the ground-state energy, derivatives with re- spect to variational parameters, and other expectation values. The heart of the method lies in the judicious statistical sampling of integration points to obtain an estimate of the many-body integrals involved in evaluat- ing expectations of the Slater-Jastrow trial wavefunction . This estimate is limited in accuracy by statistical noise; however if the trial wavefunction is a good approximation to the ground-state wavefunction this noise can be very easily managed with a relatively small number of con- figurations [13]. Optimized wavefunctions are obtained by minimizing the variance of the energy [13]. With a trial wavefunction of 18 expansion terms including two set by the same- and opposite- spin cusp conditions, up to l+m+n= 6 in the basis function expansion, we obtain a value of 3.8028(2) a.u. for the ground-state valence-shell energy. The correlation energy, measured with respect to a noninteracting ground-state energy of 3.7188 a.u., is 97% of the correlation energy obtained from Green’s function Monte Carlo and 95% of that obtained from CI 3using the same nonlocal pseudopotential [15]. A simi- lar calculation starting from a two determinant reference point [Eq. (8)], adding the 3 p2 z3px3pyexcited state to the noninteracting ground-state configuration, resulted in a modest improvement in energy to 3.8041(2) a.u. or 96.6% of the valence-shell correlation energy with respect to CI. To calculate correlation functions, we measure spin- decomposed single-particle densities n(r,σ) and condi- tional densities n(r,σ|r0,σ0). The spin-dependent con- ditional density is defined as the ground-state density distribution as a function of spin σand position rof theN−1 other particles given one with spin σ0fixed atr0. The difference between the conditional and “un- restricted” densities, gives the spin-dependent exchange - correlation hole, Eq. (1), nxc(r0,σ0;r,σ) =n(r,σ|r0,σ0)−n(r,σ). (9) Separate calculations are done to measure the density and the conditional density for various values of r0and σ0. These expectations are first calculated exactly for the Slater-determinant wavefunction (setting F= 0 in our trial wavefunction). Then, the difference between the expectations obtained with the Slater determinant and the fully interacting wavefunctions is measured sta- tistically using Monte Carlo sampling and the method of correlated estimates [28]. This technique is an effi- cient means to estimate statistically the change in the expectation of an observable under a small perturbation of the Hamiltonian or of the variational parameters of the wavefunction, taking advantage of the high degree of correlation between the two expectations to reduce noise in the difference of their statistical estimates. In the present case, the correlation hole, which describes the difference between the correlated and Slater-determinant exchange-correlation holes, is fairly small compared to the exchange-correlation hole. It is thus a reasonable as- sumption that the correlated estimation approach should improve the sampling efficiency for this quantity. In prac- tice, the procedure was observed to reduce statistical er- rors in our data by a factor of 5, and roughly 105random samples of the wavefunction sufficed to obtain expecta- tion values. The expectations for density and conditional density were expanded in a plane wave basis, taking the aver- age of/summationtext iexp(−iG·ri) for a set of plane waves up to a 32 Ry cutoff, on a supercell 18 Bohr radii ( aB) in length. The coefficients were symmetrized and fast-Fourier trans- formed to obtain real-space densities. This expansion provides smooth profiles despite the statistical noise of the sampling. On the other hand the short-wavelength cutoff causes an unrealistic rounding off of the correla- tion hole cusp at short interparticle distances, and spu- rious oscillations at low densities. At present this cutoff is the largest error in our calculation. In the case of the exchange-correlation hole this error is notable mostly in the cusp region. A more complete discussion of errors is presented in Sec. V in regard to the pair correlationfunction which is more sensitive to the cutoff error than the exchange-correlation hole. IV. RESULTS FOR THE EXCHANGE-CORRELATION HOLE The exchange hole in DFT is obtained by evaluating nxcfrom Eq. (1) for the Slater determinant wavefunction that minimizes the energy in the noninteracting ( λ= 0) limit: with the Coulomb interaction replaced by a single- particle potential that reproduces the true ground-state density [20]. In practice the Slater determinant of local DFT orbitals used in our calculations produces a density that differs from our VMC density by a few percent. In terms of these orbitals, the exchange hole is: nx(r0,σ0;r,σ) =−/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/summationtextNσ α=1ψ∗ α(r0,σ)ψα(r,σ)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 δσσ0 n(r0,σ0)(10) where the sum runs over all the occupied single-particle orbitalsψαfor the spin component σ. This expression, as a function of rfor fixed r0(i.e., interpreting the hole as the change in density of the system at rgiven a parti- cle observed at r0) has the form of minus the probability density of a hybrid atomic orbital. That is, it describes a normalized linear combination of single-particle orbital s with coefficients cα=ψ∗ α(r0,σ0)//radicalbig n(r0,σ0). This choice ofcαfor each orbital ψαrepresents the unique linear combination of orbitals that maximizes the probability for an electron to be observed at r0and spinσ0(con- versely giving zero likelihood for any other electron to be observed at that point.) Finally the integral over rof the exchange hole is −1, as it measures the integrated differ- ence in density between the ( N−1)-electron system given one electron fixed at r0and the full N-electron system. For a spin-up particle on the zaxis in the Lz=0 pro- jection, this exchange-hole orbital is a 3 sstate since the occupiedpstates (px,py) are in the x-yplane. The ex- change hole is completely insensitive to the electron po- sition on this axis, given only one possible orbital from which to construct it. The situation along this axis thus corresponds to an extreme departure from the “dynamic” picture of the exchange hole derived from the homoge- neous electron gas. For a particle on the xaxis, the hole is a combination of sandpxorbitals. We find that the occupation probability |cp|2of theporbital to be between 60% and 75% in the region (0 .5aB<x<2.5aB) of peak density along the xaxis; this is roughly equivalent to that of asp2hybrid orbital (which is two-thirds p) oriented in the direction of the fixed particle. The slight variation in thecpacts to keep the hole more or less centered on the reference electron in the region of peak density on the x-yplane. The exchange hole as a result is more sensi- tive to the exact location of particles in this plane, and therefore more efficient in screening them, than along the zaxis, leading to significant differences in the correlation 4z/a x/aB-3)B Density (a -6-4-20246-6-4-20246 -0.06-0.05-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.0100.01(a) B B z/a(c) x/aB-6-4-20246-6-4-20246-0.045-0.035-0.025-0.015-0.005(b) Bz/a x/aB-6-4-20246-6-4-20246 -0.06-0.05-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.0100.01 FIG. 1. The same spin (a), opposite spin (b) and total (c) exch ange-correlation hole about a spin-up particle located at 1 .4aB from the atom center on the xaxis (parallel to the porbitals) for the ground state of the Si atom in the Lz=0 projection. The surface plot shows the change in density along a plane cuttin g through the origin along the xandzaxes. z/a x/aB-3)B Density (a -6-4-20246-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.010(a) B B z/a(c) x/aB -6-4-20246-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6-0.045-0.035-0.025-0.015-0.0050.005(b) Bz/a x/aB -6-4-20246-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.010 FIG. 2. The same spin (a), opposite spin (b) and total (c) exch ange-correlation hole about a spin-up particle located at 1.4aBfrom the atom center on the zaxis (perpendicular to the porbitals). Cut through atom as in Fig. 1. holes in the two cases as well. This transition from “non- dynamic” screening along the axis perpendicular to the occupiedporbitals to a more “dynamic” screening in the plane occupied by them, particularly as it occurs at peak density in the valence shell, constitutes a major difference between the nxcof Si and that of closed-shell atoms. In Figs. 1 and 2 we plot the exchange-correlation hole about a spin-up electron fixed at the point of peak density parallel to and perpendicular to the two 3 porbitals of the ml= 0 (pancake) projection of the Si atom. The single- configuration Slater-Jastrow wavefunction [Eq. (6)] is used. Each plot shows the response to this electron in the x-zplane, that is, the plane cutting through the center of the atom at the plot origin, with one axis ( x) parallel to and one ( z) perpendicular to the occupied porbitals. The hole is split into same spin (a), opposite spin (b) and total (c) response. The comparison between these two situations shows the dramatic anisotropy in nxcre- flecting that of the exchange hole. For a spin-up electron placed on the xaxis, Fig. 1, the exchange-correlation hole is dominated by the sp2-like exchange hole. The additional effects of Coulomb corre- lation on the same-spin channel are hard to detect, while the opposite-spin correlation hole is small (contributing14% of the total on-top hole, or value of the hole at zero interparticle separation.) It is largely confined to a nar- row region about the electron, indicating that the sp2 hybrid hole screens the electron efficiently. Fig. 2 shows the exchange-correlation hole of a spin- up electron on the zaxis, perpendicular to the two p orbitals. With the addition of correlation, the same-spin hole (a) loses the rotational symmetry of the 3 sstate that characterizes the exchange hole, with the polarization of the two 3porbitals creating a double valley on either side of the reference electron. The opposite-spin hole (b) shows the polarization of the 3 sspin-down orbital, with a well centered about the fixed electron and a strong dipole response at longer range. The totalz-axis exchange-correlation hole, (c), shows a smooth interpolation of the two spin contributions lead- ing to a large crescent-shaped area near the electron from which the other electrons are repelled. The correla- tion hole contributes considerably to the total exchange- correlation hole, with up to 40% of the total on-top hole due to correlation. Although the 3 s-orbital exchange hole is highly nonlocal and does not efficiently screen the electron, the correlation contribution goes a long way to make the total hole more local. 5In addition to the obvious differences in nxcalong each axis due to the differences in the exchange hole, Figs. 1 and 2 reveal subtle differences in the opposite- spin hole. The extent of the orientational anisotropy in the opposite-spin hole can be better visualized by plot- ting the hole along the xaxis for the up-spin electron fixed on the xaxis and along the zaxis for the electron fixed on the zaxis, cutting through the minima and max- ima of the contour plots Figs. 1(b) and 2(b). These are represented as solid lines in Figs. 3(a) and (b). The most notable difference between the two cases is the height of the peak on the side of the atom opposite the reference electron, which is three times as large along the zaxis (b) as on thexaxis (a). In addition the minimum is slightly deeper for the z-axis case. Additionally, in Figs. 3(a) and (b) we show trends in the opposite-spin correlation hole as one gradually re- moves the reference electron from the atom. In addition to the 1.4aBcase discussed above, we place a spin-up electron on the xaxis (a) and the zaxis (b), at a distance of 2.0 and 4.0 aBfrom atom center, and plot the on-axis response of the spin-down electron as long- and short- dashed lines respectively. These three reference radii correspond to placing an electron at the peak valence density along either axis, at the average radius from the atom, and at a low density point outside the atom respec- tively. As the electron is moved to lower densities, the shape of the minimum slowly gets wider and shallower, consistent with trends in the homogeneous electron gas. The position of the hole minimum stays near the atom, and thus increasingly more off center with respect to the electron. This is expected: the correlation hole, measur- ing the change in density in the presence of an electron at some reference point, can have an absolute value no greater than the density itself. Along the xaxis, this trend to a shallow off-centered hole is correlated with a gradual increase of peak height on opposite side of atom. For thez-axis case the peak height remains roughly con- stant as the electron is removed. It is interesting to compare these results to recent an- alytic studies of the asymptotic limit of the exchange- correlation hole of Be and Ne [8,29]. In the limit of an electron far removed from the atom, nxcmeasures the collapse of the remaining N−1 electrons to an eigen- state of the positive ion. The correlation component of nxcmeasures the change in electron density due to the reduced Coulomb reduction between the remaining elec- trons. At intermediate distances, a few atomic radii from the atom center, nxcalso shows a dipole polarization of the atom, or a reduction of electron density from the side of the atom nearer the reference electron to the farther side, more so for the more polarizable Be than for Ne. The collapse to the ion in the asymptotic limit results in a correlation hole peaked in the center with a minimum around the edge of the atom. This may possibly be seen in our data for the 4.0 aBx-axis case of Fig. 3(a), where the correlation-hole profile develops a peak on both sides of the ion core. The correlation hole along both axes−1012nxc(r,σ;r0,σ0) (x102) −5 0 x axis0.01.0gxc(r,σ;r0,σ0) 0 5 z axisa) b) d) c) r/aB FIG. 3. Spin-down response to a spin-up electron: (a) the correlation hole along the xaxis for a spin-up electron fixed on thexaxis at positions 1 .4 (solid line), 2 .0 (long-dashed) and 4.0aB(dashed line) from the atom origin. (b) the correlation hole along the zaxis for an electron fixed at corresponding positions on the zaxis. (c) the pair correlation function for the 1.4aBcase of (a), for energy cutoff of 20, 28 (both dotted lines) and 32 Ry (solid line). (d) the pair correlation funct ion for the 1.4aBcase of (b) for three trial wavefunctions: ψS−J (dashed line), ψCI(dotted),ψCI−J(solid line). In (a) and (b), the mean spin-down density is plotted for comparison as a dotted line. Additionally, the circles show the value fo r the “on-top” hole for each case plotted and the crosses, the LSD on-top hole for various points along each axis. Error bars show the standard deviation of the VMC expectation measured over several statistically independent runs. shows evidence of a dipole polarization of the valence shell when the reference electron is moved outside the atom, with a larger response on the “Be-like” zaxis than along the “Ne-like” xaxis. The contrast between Si and closed-shell atoms is that this polarization of the valence shell does not die out when a reference electron on the z axis is moved into the center of the valence shell, if any- thing becoming more pronounced, while the polarization is damped out along the xaxis under the same circum- stances. An added complexity for Si is that the final state of the system after removing an up-spin electron in dif- ferent directions corresponds to different atomic configu- rations: 3s3p2for thez-axis case (removal of the up-spin 3sorbital) but 3 s23pfor thexaxis. Thus significant differences between the correlation and exchange holes induced by electrons on different axes remain even for 6electrons asymptotically far from the atom. We have also studied the local features of the exchange- correlation holes plotted, especially the opposite-spin o n- top correlation hole, nxc(r,σ;r,−σ). This measures the reduction in the opposite-spin electron density at the lo- cation of a given electron. As the correlation hole is deep- est when the Coulomb repulsion is largest, the on-top hole also represents the lower bound for the correlation hole at any position in the atom [30]. In previous pa- pers, it was observed that this feature was well described in several small atoms [8,9] and in Hooke’s atom [31] by a local spin-density (LSD) ansatz, using the on-top hole of the homogeneous electron gas corresponding to the density and magnetization at the location of the electron pair: nLSD xc(r,r) =n(r)(gheg(0,n(r),ζ(r))−1). (11) Heregheg(u,n,ζ ) is the pair correlation function of the homogeneous electron gas at density n, magnetization ζ= (n↑−n↓)/n, and interparticle separation u. In this sense, it represents a link between the homogeneous elec- tron gas and dynamic correlations in many inhomoge- neous systems [32]. In Figs. 3(a) and (b) we plot the LSD on-top hole, us- ing homogeneous electron gas values from Ref. [33], at each point along the xandzaxes (crosses). These are compared to on-top holes of the Slater-Jastrow wavefunc- tion [Eq. (6)] evaluated specifically at the location of the electron for the correlation holes shown (circles at 1.4, 2.0, and 4.0 aB). These values for the Slater-Jastrow on-top hole are calculated directly without recourse to a plane-wave expansion, using VMC with a constrained pair random walk [34], and are exact within a negligible statistical error. The finite energy cutoffs employed for the rest of the data tend to lose sharp features of the correlation hole, in particular that of the cusp condition at zero interparticle separation. The resulting disagree- ment with the exact (for the trial wavefunction used) val- ues is at worst 20% and usually better. The LSD model agrees fairly well with the VMC data, within 10 −20% for most of the points calculated here, faithfully followin g the observed trends with respect to electron position. It provides a fairly reasonable lower limit for the correla- tion hole at all points in the atom. A calculation of the on-top hole about the spin-down electron was also done, with similar agreement with theory. It is interesting to consider in further detail the anisotropy in the opposite-spin contribution to nxcat peak density. In the cases shown in Figs. 1-3, it can be in- terpreted as the measure of the polarization of the down- spin electron density in the presence of an up-spin elec- tron. At first glance, one might guess that this down-spin polarization should roughly be invariant with respect to the angular orientation of the up-spin electron since one is measuring the response of the down-spin s-orbital to the angle-independent Coulomb interaction. More pre- cisely, one measures the correlations induced by the op-timized Jastrow factor which depend only on interelec- tron and electron-nucleus distances. The difference in the opposite-spin holes Figs. 1(b) and 2(b), is thus a direct reflection of the influence of the determinantal structure of the three up-spin electrons on the correlation response of the down-spin one. In the LDA, the influence of the environment on in- terparticle correlation is modeled by the variation with local density of the correlation hole, taken to be that of the homogeneous electron gas [3,4] at the local density. Typically the largest absolute and relative effects in this model are felt at the on-top hole. At this point it seems to describe the observed behavior quite well, with the variation in density going from the maximum of the p orbital on the xaxis to the open zaxis accounting for the difference in the peak density on-top holes. However, the large discrepancy between the maxima of the peak densityz-axis andx-axis hole, the solid lines in Fig. 3a and 3b, as well as their relatively large size, is inconsiste nt with this model. Neither does it seem easily explained by local gradient corrections, as the two points are located at a density maximum and a saddle point respectively, where any correction would be only second order in the gradient and therefore quite small. Within the context of a variational wavefunction calcu- lation, a mechanism that can introduce an orientation de- pendence into the correlation hole of an open shell atom is the three-electron “exclusion effect” or Fermi correla- tion [11] in configuration-interaction theory, which shoul d be observable for second row atoms with less than half filling in the 3 pvalence shell. For Si in the Lz= 0 pro- jection considered here, there is a “nondynamic” con- tribution to the correlation between electrons along the zaxis due to a 3 s2to 3p2 zexcitation that is forbidden for the corresponding x- ory-axis analogs by Pauli ex- clusion. This contribution to the correlation hole about an up-spin electron on the zor “unoccupied” axis, and the absence of the same about one on “occupied” axes leads to a difference in the holes observed with reference points on these axes. Since this particular configuration is within the 3 pvalence shell, and thus fairly close to the ground state energy, it is natural to expect it to play a significant role in the observed difference in response. What is striking here is that the observed orienta- tional dependence of nxcis obtained with a single Slater- determinant configuration modified by a Jastrow factor that depends only on interparticle distance and the dis- tance of particles from the core. There are no explicit orbital correlations in this trial wavefunction [Eq. (6)]. The Slater-Jastrow wavefunction, coupling a Jastrow fac- tor with a determinant formed from an incomplete set of valence orbitals, in principle could have a nonzero over- lap with the 3 p2 z3px3pyconfiguration allowed in the nor- mal exclusion-effect model, and no overlap with the ex- cluded excitations. However, this would be only one of an infinite number of configurations implicitly included in the Slater-Jastrow wavefunction, tied together by a “dy- namic” correlation factor that gives no particular varia- 7tional weight to any one configuration. Thus it is unlikely that it would fully account for the observed differences in the response along the occupied and open axes [35]. On the other hand, a more general argument involv- ing screening can be invoked to explain the orientational anisotropy in our results. If the up-spin electron is placed on thez-axis, its exchange hole is not centered on the electron position, as the electron occupies a 3 sorbital with an isotropic spatial extension throughout the atom’s valence shell. The net effect of the electron plus its ex- change hole has the nature of a dipole field along the zaxis of the atom, with an imperfectly screened nega- tive charge on the side of the atom nearest the electron and a positively charged region due to the exchange hole on the other side. The large peak in the down spin elec- tron’s response to the up-spin electron can be viewed then as a dipole induced by the dipole field formed by the imperfect exchange screening of the up-spin electron. In thex-axis case, the exchange hole is centered and lo- calized on the electron; the other two electrons are in sp2orbitals blocking out the rest of the valence shell. Therefore the up-spin electron is efficiently screened by its exchange hole, and in addition, there is no “easy” direction for redistributing the down-spin electron den- sity. In such a picture the 3 s2→3p2excitation should play an important but not exclusive role in the overall dipole response along the zaxis. This effect is observ- able in a Slater-Jastrow wavefunction because the Jas- trow factor includes correlations simultaneously between all particle pairs. Thus, the correlation response of the down-spin electron to a fixed up-spin electron involves not only their mutual Coulomb repulsion but that of the other up-spin electrons as well. The inhomogeneous dis- tribution of these electrons about the fixed electron com- bined with the effect of the external potential in essence create a Coulomb interaction with the exchange hole. V. RESULTS FOR THE PAIR CORRELATION FUNCTION A. Single Configuration Wavefunction In a system such as an atom, the pair correlation func- tiong(r0,σ0;r,σ) is a valuable tool because, given the large variation in the density over the length-scale of the exchange-correlation hole, the shape of the hole is to a large extent determined by the variation in density. The pair correlation function can distinguish the intrinsic ef - fects of correlation by eliminating any features that are simply proportional to the density. In Fig. 4 we plot the pair correlation function (PCF) for several of the cases considered previously. Specificall y, we showg(r0,↑;r,↓) fixing a spin-up particle at the peak in the valence density, 1.4 aBon thexaxis (a) and the zaxis (b) and plotting the variation with respect to the spin-down electron in the x-zplane. These results are ob-tained by dividing nxcas plotted in Figs. 1(b) and 2(b) respectively by the spin-down density, with a constant shift of 1 due to the differing conventions in their defini- tions [Eqs. (1) and (3)]. The value g= 1 corresponding tonxc= 0 (shown as a thick contour in Fig. 4) denotes the boundary between the region in which the spin-down density has been reduced ( g <1) and that in which it has been enhanced ( g>1) in the presence of the spin-up reference electron. As described in the next section the PCF can be significantly affected by statistical error at low density, so that the plot range is restricted to higher density regions where the statistical error is less than hal f a contour increment in either direction. The contours of the pair correlation function in the vicinity of the spin-up electron on the xaxis are nearly circular and centered on the electron, showing the spin- down electron repelled from it without significant direc- tional bias. The g=1 contour is slightly oblong in shape, indicating that at longer distances there is a slight bias towards shifting electron density to the high density areas on the far side of the atom ( x<0). A similar plot cut- ting through the x-yplane (ie, cutting through both the porbitals along a plane perpendicular to the one shown) shows similar results except that the g=1 contour is more circular in shape. This picture is fairly consistent with that of a homogeneous electron gas PCF which depends only on the distance between particles, and indicates that the underlying physical processes are quite similar: high energy “dynamic” correlations that are quickly screened out over the radius of the exchange hole. In comparison, the PCF in Fig. 4(b), showing the re- sponse to the spin-up electron on the zaxis shows a much greater departure from isotropy. The function has a no- ticeable dipole component with respect to the atom cen- ter, with a peak in gdirectly opposite the minimum on thezaxis. Theg= 1 contour has a much more shallow curvature than that of Fig. 4(a), so that it is no longer centered on the spin-up electron, but rather coincides roughly with the z= 0 plane in the high density region of the atom. (For the 3 s23px3pyconfiguration of Si, the PCF with a reference electron on the zaxis is rotationally invariant about the zaxis so that the contours shown in the plot can be extended to surfaces of rotation in three dimensions.) In the near vicinity of the fixed electron, the pair correlation function is no longer a function of the distance between the two coordinates randr0alone, but has taken on a noticeable angular dependence as well. Thus the slope of the well near 1.4 aBon thezaxis is steeper towards the center of the atom, shallower towards the outer edge of the atom. Although such a shape could in principle be accounted for in a region where the gra- dient of the density is large, using a gradient expansion of the homogeneous electron gas [36], it cannot be ex- plained along these lines in the current situation since it occurs at local saddle point in the density (the peak of the density along the zaxis). These features in the PCF confirm the existence of a genuine directional anisotropy in the response to an electron located perpendicular to 8BBz/a -2 -1 0 1 2-2-1012(a) x/aBB x/az/a(c) -2 -1 0 1 2-2-1012(b) x/aBBz/a -2 -1 0 1 2-2-1012 FIG. 4. The opposite-spin pair correlation function g(r0,↑;r,↓) as a function of spin-down electron position in the x-zplane for a spin-up particle fixed at (a) 1.4 aBfrom the atom center on the xaxis, (b) 1.4 aBfrom atom center on the zaxis, (c) the same as (b), with nondynamic correlations from the 3 s2to 3p2 zdouble substitution included. The contour increment is 0.1 with the contour for g=1 represented by a thicker line; the regions between are sha ded darker for lower values of g. the occupied porbitals, and suggest that the explanation lies in a nonlocal mechanism such as the response to a poorly localized 3 sexchange hole. Along this line, it is instructive to consider the exchange-correlation hole about the lone down-spin elec- tron. In this case the exchange hole is of necessity due to the 3sorbital regardless of the electron position, and one can expect significant departures from a compact, isotropic PCF. In the case of a down-spin electron on the zaxis, we observe the PCF that is very close to that about an up-spin electron, with perhaps a slightly larger dipole component. In both cases, the PCF indicates the presence of a significant dipole response that compen- sates for the poorly screening 3 sexchange hole. The PCF for a down-spin electron on the x >0 axis has a quite complicated pattern outside the on-top hole region – neither roughly isotropic like Fig. 4(a) or with simple dipole anisotropy like Fig. 4(b). There are several uncon- nected regions where the electron density is enhanced: surrounding the electron for x >0 and focused on the xaxis opposite the electron for x <0. In this case the exchange hole should not screen the electron efficiently, but there is no lowlying 3 porbital with which to con- struct a response, so that there is a possibility that the contributions of higher-order orbitals might be observ- able. B. Two Configuration Wavefunction Since we have observed a significant change in shape of the opposite-spin PCF with respect the angular orienta- tion of the reference electron, using a single-determinant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction, it is interesting to include explicitly the 3 s2→3p2 zexcitation that is predicted in CI theory to play a prominent role in producing such a behavior in the Si atom. We consider the multideter-minant wavefunction ψCIthat consists of a 3 p2 z3px3py excited state configuration as well as the noninteracting ground state. This wavefunction can be treated alone or used as a starting point for adding further correlations via the Jastrow factor [Eq. (8)]; in either case the mixing amplitudeη1for the excited state is variationally opti- mized, along with the Jastrow parameters for the latter case. We obtain a mixing coefficient η1of 0.132 and total energy 3.7263(18) a.u. in the former case and 0.056 and 3.8041(2) a.u. in the latter. The nondynamic correlation modeled by the two- configuration wavefunction alone, ψCI, is to first order inη1a dipole-dipole correlation: gCI(r0,↑;r,↓) = 1 + 2η1z0 r0z rRp(r0) Rs(r0)Rp(r) Rs(r)(12) whereRpandRsare the radial 3 sand 3porbitals. The signature of this PCF in a contour plot with the cut through the x-zplane andr0fixed on the zaxis is a series of roughly straight lines arranged antisymmetri- cally about the z= 0 plane, with the g= 1 contour at z= 0. The shape of the function is independent of the position of the fixed particle, with the only change being in the overall amplitude. For one electron fixed on the xaxis, on the node of the pzorbital, the PCF is to first order zero. In Fig. 4(c) we show a contour plot for the opposite- spin PCF of the combined CI plus Jastrow wavefunction, ψCI−J, for the same plot parameters as Fig. 4(b): with the up-spin electron fixed at 1.4 aBon thezaxis. In this case the occupation probability of the excited-state Slater-Jastrow wavefunction is very small, 0.3%, and the change in the total ground-state energy from the single- determinant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction is correspond- ingly small. On the other hand the explicit addition of the nondynamic correlation increases the correlation en- ergy by 1.6% and has a significant impact on the shape 9of the hole. The PCF has a clear dipole-dipole signature, exaggerating the spatial anisotropy already visible in the one determinant case. The g=1 contour is closer to the z=0 axis, and the short-range well about the fixed parti- cle, which for a particle near the peak of the valence shell density could be expected to be fairly deep and isotropic, has been reduced to a shallow and open-ended dip. As expected from the form of the nondynamic correlation, little change was observed in the PCF for a particle fixed on thexaxis. A quantitative comparison of gfor the above cases is also instructive and is shown in Figs. 3(c) and (d). We plotg(r0,↑;r,↓) varyingralong thexaxis and fixing r0 at 1.4aBon thexaxis (c) and the analogous situation for thez-axis (d). Error bars on the statistical measurements of these quantities are plotted, as well as the plane-wave cutoff dependence for the x-axis case. The converged result on the xaxis (solid line) is well localized about the reference particle’s position, with an enhancement of particle density on the opposite side of the atom. The results for the zaxis, Fig. 3(d) include the PCF for the three different trial wavefunctions discussed above: the single Slater determinant plus Jastrow factor, ψS−J (dashed line), the two-configuration wavefunction ψCI (dotted line) and the same multiplied by a Jastrow fac- torψCI−J(solid line). In comparison to the most ac- curate result, ψCI−J,ψCIpredicts with some success the long-wavelength polarization response to the elec- tron at r0, determining how much the electron density is pushed from one side of the atom to the other. The major difference is the absence of the small dip in the immediate vicinity of the electron due to the cusp con- dition, which naturally is not obtained from the two- configuration wavefunction. In contrast, ψS−J, which does not include explicit orbital-dependent correlations but can be optimized to obtain accurate results for short interparticle distances, is nearly identical to ψCI−Jin the vicinity of the reference electron but underestimates the long-wavelength polarization of the atom, obtaining about 70% of the PCF of ψCI−Jon the other side of the atom. The mixing coefficient η1for the excited-state con- figuration was reduced by about 60% when the Jastrow factor was added to the multiconfiguration result, indi- cating that part of the polarization of the atom produced by the simple two configuration wavefunction is already accounted for by the Jastrow factor. In each case the z-axis PCF leads to a much larger peak on the far side of the atom than the x-axis case. C. Error Analysis There are three sources of error in our calculation: sta- tistical error in taking Monte Carlo estimates, the finite plane-wave cutoff of the data, and finally the variational bias due to the discrepancies of the trial from the true ground state wavefunction. The first two are closely con-nected and to some extent can be regulated; the third is harder to assess. In a typical Monte Carlo calculation, sample points for evaluating the density or other single-particle ex- pectation in a given region of space are generated with frequency proportional to the density itself. This leads to statistically precise measurements of the den- sity at high density and large relative errors that vary roughly as 1 //radicalbig n(r) at the vanishingly low densities outside the atom. Calculating the VMC expectations, </summationtext iexp(−iG·ri)>, of a set of plane-waves periodic on a supercell is equivalent to taking the Fourier transform of a histogram distribution of statistical sample points on that cell. The statistical outliers from the poorly sampled, asymptotic low-density region show up in the Fourier transform as a noise background independent of energy. This noise can to some degree be controlled by imposing a finite cutoff in reciprocal space. However, too small a cutoff leads to spurious long wavelength os- cillations and is particularly poor for the short-distance region of the hole where the cusp condition results in a long range tail in the reciprocal space. We find that a good balance between controlling statistical and plane- wave error can be found by choosing a cutoff when the statistical average of the plane-wave component of the density is roughly equal to the statistical noise in its cal- culation. For a sampling size of around 105independent configurations, this cutoff limit proves to be about 32 Ry for a resolution of 1.0 aB. The statistical error of the Monte Carlo sampling was measured both for the individual plane-wave components of the density and conditional density, and for their real- space counterparts by measuring the standard deviation of these quantities over 10 to 20 independent runs. As shown in Fig. 3(c) and (d), the error bars of the PCF do in fact vary roughly as 1 //radicalbig n(r) with well controlled errors in the peak density region, increasing to arbitraril y large values as one moves outside the atom. With the cutoff used, statistical errors in the PCF are limited to a value of less than 0.05 (out of a range in the PCF of the order of 1.0) for particles within 3.5 aBof the atom center, which in effect provides the limits in the plots of the PCF in Fig. 4. The convergence of the plane-wave expansion was checked by plotting the PCF as a function of cutoff en- ergy. A typical result is shown in Fig. 3(c) where the x-axis PCF for a particle fixed at 1.4 aBon the axis is plotted, for cutoff energies of 20, 28 and 32 Ry. The exact on-top hole has been measured by a direct VMC calcu- lation and is plotted as a circle. The 20 Ry calculation shows clear deviations from the higher energy cutoff data, particularly in the region of the on-top hole, ie., in the immediate vicinity of the fixed electron, where the cusp condition contributes a high-energy tail to the exchange- correlation hole. The agreement between the two higher energy plots is well within statistical error except in the core region of the atom and in the low density tails. The 1032 Ry case has not yet converged in the on-top region to the exact on-top value plotted as a circle, indicative of the slow convergence of the plane-wave expansion to the on-top hole cusp. A final source of error is from the effect of the de- viation of the variational trial wavefunctions [Eqs. (6) and (8)] from the exact ground state. The ground-state energy, being variationally optimized, is typically de- termined with much less error than other expectations (though one may expect that those important in the de- termination of the energy, such as the density and nxc, should still be robust. An example of this problem is demonstrated in Fig. 4 in which two variationally opti- mized wavefunctions having relatively insignificant dif- ferences in total energy, give PCF’s with noticeable dif- ferences for an electron fixed on the unoccupied zaxis. The variational method is in general more sensitive to errors in the wavefunction at high density as this region contributes the most to the variational energy. Thus we expect worse errors in the PCF when one or both coor- dinates are at low density. In order to gauge possible errors arising from varia- tional bias in our wavefunction, we study the change in the PCF and in nxcfor several choices of trial wave- function. Specifically we used trial wavefunctions with four, ten and eighteen Boys and Handy basis functions, corresponding to keeping expansion terms of order o= l+m+nup to 2, 4 and 6 respectively in our Jastrow func- tion. The lowest order function has, in addition to two terms that set the cusp condition for each spin compo- nent, only one electron-electron and one electron-nucleus term. The correlation energy of each wavefunction is 0.0640(8), 0.0812(4), and 0.0840(2) a.u. respectively, in comparison to 0.0877(2) a.u. using the multideterminant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction and 0.0883 a.u. for the CI calculation of Ref. [15]. In Fig. 5 we plot the opposite-spin PCF using these trial wavefunctions for two cases previously considered in Sec. IV: (a) an up-spin electron placed at 1.4 aBon thexaxis and (b) an up-spin electron placed at 4.0 aB on thezaxis. As in Fig. 3 we present a cut through the atom center and the reference electron, thus showing the minimum and maximum of the PCF. The first case represents a probable best-case situation, with the refer- ence electron placed at peak density on an axis occupied by a 3porbital, so that nondynamic correlations due to the open-shell structure should be neglible. In contrast the second case presents the worst case scenario: at low density along the unoccupied axis. The behavior of the PCF in the asymptotic low-density region of the atom is dominated by the statistical error of our plane-wave basis and is not shown. In our best-case scenario, (a), the PCF near the refer- ence electron is very well obtained with even the crud- est model used ( o= 2). On the far side of the atom with respect to the reference electron position, there is a noticeable increase in the magnitude of the peak of the PCF with the increase in accuracy of the wavefunction.−3.0 0.0 x axis012gxc(r,σ;r0,σ0) r0=1.4aB(100) ψHF−J, n=2 ψHF−J, n=4 ψHF−J, n=6 ψCI−J, n=6 ψCI 0.0 3.0 z axisr0=4.0aB(001) r/aB(a) (b) FIG. 5. Convergence data for the opposite-spin PCF for up-spin electron fixed at (a) 1.4 aBon thexaxis and (b) 4.0aBon thezaxis. Cases shown are for Boys and Handy terms up to order o= 2,4,and 6 as described in the text, in a one-determinant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction, and o= 6 for a two-determinant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction. Additiona lly, results for a two-determinant wavefunction without Jastro w factor are given in (b) as a dot-dashed line. As expected, the addition of nondynamic correlations in form of a two-determinant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction (solid line) has no noticeable effect. An investigation of the corresponding contour plots, cutting through the x-z plane as shown in Fig. 4, shows that the depth and spa- tial extent of the PCF is obtained with the lowest order wavefunction and varies only slightly with increase in ba- sis set. The major difference is the gradual adjustment of theg= 1 contour from a more isotropic shape to the elliptical one shown in Fig. 4(a), which accounts for the gradual increase in the peak on the far side of the xaxis as theg= 1 contour moves towards the atom center. The worst case scenario (b) shows a far greater degree of disagreement between wavefunctions. The three one- determinant Slater-Jastrow wavefunctions agree fairly well with each other, with an increasing percentage of the electron density removed from the near side of the atom and placed on the far side. The peak height on the far side is roughly the same as for the 1.4 aB, high- density case shown in Fig. 3(d). The introduction of the nondynamic 3 s2→3p2excitation into the Slater-Jastrow wavefunction (solid line) leads to a dramatic change in the shape of the PCF. The peak of the PCF from the base value of g= 1 representing no change due to corre- lations is increased by a factor of three, and only at the 11on-top hole (not shown) is there no significant change in the PCF. In comparison, the PCF of the optimized two-determinant wavefunction ψCIdiscussed in Sec. V is shown as a dot-dashed line. The two-determinant Slater- Jastrow wavefunction is an interpolation between the two limiting cases, favoring ψCIat most locations. An explanation of the “gigantic” features in the non- dynamic part of the PCF in Fig. 5(b) comes from the observation that the ratio zRp(r)/Rs(r) between the 3 p and 3sorbital, which determines the shape of the nondy- namic PCF to first order [Eq. 12], increases exponentially at large distances along the zaxis. As a result, in the asymptotic region (that is, either the response to a refer- ence electron outside the atom or the asymptotic tails of the response to a reference electron at high density), the nondynamic correlation introduced with the 3 s2→3p2 z substitution is no longer a small perturbation even with a small mixing parameter. The Jastrow factor basis func- tions however are chosen to tend to a constant at either large electron-electron or electron-nucleus distances. I t is quite likely that none of the cases studied accurately represents the true asymptotic behavior of the correlation function. They should rather be considered to provide a qualitative idea of the PCF as well as a sense of the range of behavior it should reasonably lie within. It is interesting to note that the agreement between the various PCF’s is far closer for the high density case on thezaxis plotted in Fig. 3(d). This indicates the greater weight of the exchange-correlation hole at high density in determining the total exchange-correlation en- ergy, and the corresponding robustness of its determi- nation even with qualitatively different wavefunctions. Given the large degree of variation in the asymptotic limit, it would be interesting to study the effect of in- cluding a larger number of configurations in a multide- terminantal Slater-Jastrow wavefunction or include the effects of backflow or multielectron coordinates [14] into the evaluation of orbitals. At higher densities we ex- pect the effect of such improvements in the wavefunction would be to add further refinements in the shape of the PCF along the zaxis, but with much less change in basic features such as its range and magnitude. VI. CORRELATION EFFECTS ON THE SPIN DENSITY In addition to the exchange-correlation hole, the spin components of the single-particle density change with the inclusion of Coulomb correlations. In principle, the Kohn-Sham equations used to derive the density in DFT should give the exact ground-state radial density, even for a degenerate ground-state [12]; however there is no such principle for the spin components of the density. Thus a change observed in the spin components of the density that does not alter the total radial density can be con- sidered an intrinsic feature of Coulomb correlation andnot simply due to the inaccuracy of the LDA density. As withnxc, a prominent feature of the change in the spin- dependent density, ∆ n(r,σ), is anisotropy with respect to the fully occupied xand openzaxes. This anisotropy in ∆n(r,σ) may help to shed light on the mechanisms underlying the anisotropy in nxc. −5.0 0.0 5.0 x axis r/aB z axis−2.00.02.04.0(nVMC(r) − nLDA(r)) x 103down spin, ψHF−J up spin, ψHF−J down spin, ψCI−J up spin, ψCI−J ψCI FIG. 6. The change in the spin-dependent density n1(r,σ)−n0(r,σ) between the fully interacting and noninter- acting systems. The left side of the plot shows a cut through thexaxis; the right side, through the zaxis. The solid line is the spin-down density change using the one-determinant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction ψS−J; the long-dashed is the spin-up density change for the same wavefunction. Dot- ted and dashed lines give the corresponding quantities for the two-determinant Slater-Jastrow function ψCI−J. The dot-dashed line is for the two-determinant function ψCI. The plot units are 10−3a.u. In Fig. 3, the spin-down density for the single determi- nant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction is plotted as a dotted line along the xaxis (a) and zaxis (b). Note that in the noninteracting wavefunction this density is that of the 3sorbital and thus the same along each axis. However, in the interacting case, anisotropy in the correlation re- sponse reduces the density along the xaxis by roughly 6% and increases it by the same amount along the z- axis. This change is shown in Fig. 6 (solid line) along with the change in the spin-up density (long-dashed line), with the right side of the plot showing a cut through the xaxis and the left side a cut through the z-axis. The corresponding density changes using the two-determinant Slater-Jastrow wavefunction ( ψCI−J) are plotted as dot- ted and dashed lines. In both cases, the change in the spin-up density has a qualitative trend opposite to that of the spin-down density, showing a large enhancement 12in density near the peak of the 3 pxorbital and a drop in density along the zaxis. Thus, the changes in the two spin components cancel out partially in the total density, but add to the total spin density, defined as m(r) =n(r,↑)−n(r,↓). In addition there are observ- able effects of a small reduction in the radius of the atom that occurs with the addition of the Jastrow correlation term, particularly a reduction in up-spin density at a large distance from the atom and an enhancement of the down-spin density in the core region. A convergence test along the lines of that for nxcin the previous section was carried out for the spin components of the density. The qualitative trends are repeatable with the less accurate Jastrow factors but with considerably slower quantitative convergence than for nxc. An anisotropic shift in spin density can be gener- ated from the nondynamic Fermi correlation discussed in the previous sections: the mixing of the noninteracting ground-state with a 3 s2→3p2 z-substitution excited state and the lack thereof due to Pauli exclusion for the 3 px and 3pyanalogs. Using the two-determinant wavefunc- tionψCI, the resulting change in each spin component of the density is ∆n(r,↑) = ∆n(r,↓) =η2 1(|ψ3pz(r)|2− |ψ3s(r)|2) (13) whereψ3sandψ3pzare the wavefunctions of the 3 sand 3pzorbitals and η1the excited state probability ampli- tude. This function, shown as a dash-dotted line in Fig 6, corresponds to a density enhancement along the zaxis and reduction in the x-yplane for bothspin-components for a net zero change in the spin density m(r), in marked contrast to the mutually opposing changes of the two spin-components of the Monte Carlo data. Given the op- timal value of η2 1= 0.017 for the occupation number of the excited-state configuration, one finds that the magni- tude of the change in either spin component of the den- sity is much smaller than observed, and qualitatively in the wrong direction for the up-spin case. When the non- dynamics2→p2 zexcitation is included into the Slater- Jastrow wavefunction (dotted and dashed lines), both the up-spin and down-spin densities are enhanced slightly along thezaxis, but the qualitative picture remains unchanged – as one might expect from the very small value ofη2 1= 0.003 that was optimal for this case. For these reasons, it is unlikely that the observed anisotropic change in the spin components of the density can be ex- plained by this type of mechanism. On the other hand, a simple explanation of these re- sults lies in that the observed change in the spin density reduces the spatial overlap between the two spin compo- nents. As the correlation energy is predominantly deter- mined by the spatial correlation between opposite-spin electrons, such a change in spin density can reduce the correlation energy in a way that reduces the total energy if the total density remains unchanged. This correlation effect is similar to that of the unrestricted Hartree-Fock method [37] in which the energy of a system like H 2canbe lowered from its Hartree-Fock value by breaking a symmetry of the ground state to induce the spatial sep- aration of opposite spin-components of the density. In the Si atom, since the ground state is degenerate and lacks the symmetry of the Hamiltonian, it already has a nonzero spin density; multiplication by a Jastrow fac- tor does not break the symmetry of the ground state in a substantial way [38]. The change in spin-density re- flects the effect of the Coulomb interaction which induces the spatial separation between opposite spin electrons, in a system in which the different spin components are to some degree already spatially separated in the noninter- acting state. In contrast to a filled-shell atom or other spin-unpolarized system, this spatial separation of oppo- site spins appears not only as a correlation hole but as a change in the mean density as well. Consistent with this picture, the direction of the change in the Lz=0 projec- tion of the Si atom enhances the absolute difference in the spin density |n(r,↑)−n(r,↓)|that already exists in the Hartree-Fock wavefunction, where up-spin electrons occupiespxandpyorbitals while the lone down-spin elec- tron does not. VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION We have calculated the exchange-correlation hole of the valence shell of the ground state of the Si atom as a function of spin decomposition, using the Variational Monte Carlo method. This relatively simple four electron system, restricted to a single valence shell, nevertheless shows a rich variety of phenomena in exchange and cor- relation not present in closed-shell atoms. The incomplete filling of the valence shell of the open- shell atom leads to dramatic anisotropy and nonlocality in the exchange hole, even at peak densities in the valence shell. This is accompanied by a significant compensat- ing anisotropy in the correlation hole making the total exchange-correlation hole more (but not completely) lo- cal and isotropic. Our paper has focused mostly on the exchange- correlation hole about a majority (up) spin electron. In this case, as one goes from a reference point at peak den- sity along an “occupied” axis, along which one of the occupied 3porbitals is oriented, to one on the “open” zaxis perpendicular to the 3 porbitals, the exchange hole changes from an efficiently screening 3 sp2-like to a poorly screening 3scharacter. As a result, we observe in the re- sponse of the minority (down) spin density a significant “dipole” shift or shift of density from one side of the atom to the other, that occurs when the up-spin electron is placed in the peak density position on the open axis and not when it is placed in the center of a porbital. This difference shows up in the pair correlation function as a difference in shape, with that on the “occupied” axis being a modest distortion of the isotropic shape of a dynamic correlation, and that on the zaxis showing a 13marked dipole component along the zaxis. The dipole polarization observed is also notable in that it occurs not only for a reference electron outside the atom but at the peak along the zaxis, where the local gradient is zero; it is therefore a truly nonlocal feature not amenable to modeling by an expansion in the local density gradient. The explicit inclusion of nondynamic correlations into our wavefunction enhances the difference between open and occupied-axis response, particularly when the refer- ence electron is moved outside the atom. This is due to the exclusion effect in which the 3 s2→3p2substitu- tion is allowed along the open axis and excluded along the occupied ones. Nevertheless, the existence of such a difference in the single-determinant Slater-Jastrow wave- function, given the structure of the Jastrow factor, seems better explained in terms of the screening of the exchange hole, in which the Coulomb interaction of the down spin electron with the up-spin 3 sexchange hole causes the dipole response along the open axis. In this case, it is the lowlying 3porbital that best compensates for the poor screening of the exchange hole. It should thus play an important if not exclusive role in inducing the anisotropy of the opposite spin correlation hole. A second major effect of the open-shell structure of the atom upon its response to the Coulomb interaction is the change of the spin components of the density with the addition of correlations. The down-spin density is pushed inwards and onto the unoccupied axis and the up-spin density pushed off the zaxis and onto the peak of theporbitals in the x-yplane, resulting in a reduc- tion of the spatial overlap between the two spin compo- nents in a way which leaves the radial density largely unchanged. The standard exclusion effect resulting from the 3s2→3p2 zsubstitution produces a net change in den- sity that is both quantitatively too small and qualita- tively incorrect. However, both the anisotropic features of the exchange-correlation hole and the changes in spin density essentially stem from the same effect: the ten- dency of the Coulomb interaction to induce the spatial separation of opposite spin electrons in the context of the spatially anisotropic and spin-polarized structure of the degenerate Si ground state. We have only briefly discussed the nxcfor a down-spin electron, where in addition to the screening of the ex- change hole (always 3 s-like), the anisotropy of the deter- minantal structure of the up-spin electrons plays an im- portant role. The correlation response to the down-spin electron on the occupied axis combines a compensation for poor screening by the exchange hole and the absence of a lowlying 3 p-orbital component from the correlation hole on account of Pauli exclusion. We have observed in this situation subtle structural properties in the PCF that merit further investigation. In contrast to longer ranged features of the correlation hole we find that its on-top value – the reduction of elec- tron density in the immediate vicinity of an electron – is reproduced by a local density ansatz within 10-20%, over a fairly wide range in density and magnetization,and is otherwise insensitive to the structure of the atom. Given the energetically reasonable shape of the LDA nxc and that it satisfies the short-range cusp condition and global particle-sum rule of the true nxcin addition to the approximate fit to the Si on-top hole, it is reason- able to expect that it will provide a good approximation for the angle- or system-averaged nxc, that is, after av- eraging out many of the subtle angle or position depen- dent features studied here [8]. Nevertheless, the complex spin-dependent phenomena observed in this paper point to the inherent difficulty of systematically improving on local or semilocal density functional theories in systems with nontrivial valence-shell structure, such as open shel l atoms or multiply-bonded molecules. Our results provide support for several recent hybrid approaches to DFT. The combination of a short ranged on-top hole that is fairly well modeled by local density functional theory and longer-ranged exchange and exclu- sion effects that are not indicates the usefulness of den- sity functional schemes which include the on-top hole as a basic component [32] or involve the hybridization of short-ranged local or semilocal density functionals with a more accurate treatment of longer ranged correlations us- ing RPA [36] or CI [12]. The tendency of the correlation hole to cancel out the anisotropy in the exchange hole, and increase the sensitivity of the exchange-correlation hole to electron position, along with the quality of the on-top hole in the LSD approximation, lends support to recent hybrid approaches [22] which mix the exact ex- change hole with an local DFT approximation of the full-coupling constant exchange-correlation hole. These methods rely on the assumption that the full coupling constant limit of the integral in Eq. (4) is more likely to be amenable to approximation by the isotropic, localized nxcof the homogeneous electron gas than the noninter- acting limit dominated by exchange. In the case of the open-shell atom exclusion effects quite effectively can- cel out the gross anisotropy in the exchange hole caused by the open-shell structure, at least within the region of peak valence density. On the other hand, the changes in spin-density that we observe indicate that a standard Hartree-Fock or re- stricted CI basis set may be a less desirable starting point for implementing hybrid DFT methods in spin-polarized systems than, for example, a generalized Hartree-Fock approach that would allow for anisotropic distortions in the spin density due to Coulomb correlations. Also, it seems possible that more could be done to obtain ac- curate correlation energies within the local spin-density approximation with the incorporation of projection spe- cific information. One of us (A. C. Cancio) would like to thank Kieron Burke for helpful discussions. This work was supported by Sandia National Laboratories contract AP-7094 and the Campus Laboratories Collaboration of the University of California. 14[1] R. O. Jones and O. Gunnarson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 689 (1989). [2] Warren E. Pickett and Jeremy Q. Broughton, Phys. Rev. B48, 14859 (1993-II). [3] G. Ortiz and P. Ballone, Phys. Rev. B 50, 1391 (1994). [4] J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 46, 12947 (1992- II); J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and Wang, Phys. Rev. B 54, 16533 (1996). [5] C. A. Coulson and A. H. Neilson, Proc. Phys. Soc. 78, 831 (1961). [6] J. Sanders and K. E. Banyard, J. Chem Phys. 96, 4536 (1992). [7] M. A. Buijse and E. J. Baerends, in Density Functional Theory of Molecules, Clusters and Solids ed. D. E. Ellis, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995). [8] M. Ernzerhof, J. P. Perdew and K. Burke, in Density Functional Theory , ed. R Nalewajski, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996). [9] K. Burke, J. P. Perdew and M. Ernzerhof, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 3760 (1998). [10] M. Ernzerhof, K. Burke and J.P. Perdew, in “Recent De- velopments and Applications of Modern Density Func- tional Theory”, ed. J.M. Seminario (Elsevier, 1996). [11] O. Sinanoglu, Adv. Chem. Phys. 6, 315 (1968). [12] A. Savin, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 22, 59 (1996); A. Savin, in “Recent Developments and Applications of Modern Density Functional Theory”, ed. J.M. Seminario (Elsevier, 1996). [13] C. J. Umrigar, K. G. Wilson, and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1719 (1988). [14] K. E. Schmidt and J. W. Moskowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 4172 (1990). [15] L. Mit´ aˇ s, E. L. Shirley and D. M. Ceperley, J. Chem. Phys. 953467, (1991); L. Mit´ aˇ s in Computer Simula- tion Studies in Condensed Matter Physics V , ed. by D. P. Landau, K. K. Mon, and H. B. Schuttler (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1993). [16] J. C. Kimball, Phys. Rev. A 7, 1648 (1973). [17] S. Fahy, X. W. Wang and Steven G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1631 (1988). [18] Randolph Q. Hood et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 783350 (1997); Randall Q. Hood et al., Phys. Rev. B, 578972 (1998). [19] D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, Solid State Commun. 17, 1425 (1975). [20] M. Levy, in “Recent Developments and Applications of Modern Density Functional Theory”, ed. J.M. Seminario (Elsevier, 1996). [21] O. Gunnarson, M. Jonson and B. I. Lundqvist, Phys. Rev. B 20, 3136 (1979). [22] A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1372 (1993); A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993). [23] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 54 16533 (1996).[24] A. J. Thakkar et al., Int. J. Quantum Chem. 26, 157 (1984). [25] The exchange hole of DFT is nearly identical with the Fermi hole commonly studied in quantum chemistry. However, the noninteracting ground-state in DFT and the corresponding single-particle orbitals are determine d by the Kohn-Sham equation and in principle obtain the density of the exact ground state, while the Fermi hole is usually defined in terms of the Hartree-Fock ground state. Similarly, the correlation hole defined with respect to the full coupling constant exchange-correlation hole is the analog of the Coulomb hole of Ref. [5]. [26] D. R. Hamann, M. Schl¨ uter and C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 1494 (1979); G. B. Bachelet, D. R. Hamann and M. Schl¨ uter, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4199 (1982). [27] N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 279 (1973). [28] D. Ceperley and M. H. Kalos in Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics , edited by K. Binder (Springer Verlag, Berlin 1979). [29] M. Ernzerhof, K. Burke and J.P. Perdew, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2798 (1996). [30] Note that this argument refers to a perspective comple- mentary to that held elsewhere in this paper and in the literature. One measures the correlation hole at a fixed position in the atom in response to a reference electron somewhere else, and varies the position of the reference electron. The corresponding hole measured at the fixed position should be largest when the reference electron is moved on top it. [31] J. P. Perdew, A. Savin, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. A 51, 4531 (1995). [32] J. P. Perdew, M. Ernzerhof, K. Burke and A. Savin, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 61, 197 (1997). [33] H. Yasuhara, Solid State Commun. 11, 1481 (1972). [34] A. C. Cancio and C. Y. Fong, to be published. [35] In principle one should be able to measure the impor- tance of this configuration by a calculation of the over- lap between it and the Slater-Jastrow ground state; the significantly different nodal structure of the two states makes a VMC calculation of this quantity unreliable in practice. [36] D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 21, 5469 (1980). [37] see, for example, Peter Fulde, Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids , (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991). [38] Because of the different treatment of opposite and same- spin cusp conditions in the Jastrow factor of Slater- Jastrow wavefunctions, the total spin quantum number S2will in general not preserved (C. J. Huang, C. Filippi and C. J. Umrigar, J. Chem. Phys. 1088838, (1998).) Im- posing a spin-independent cusp condition was observed to change the up-spin component of the density noticeably, but preserved fairly closely the degree and anisotropy of spatial separation between spin-components induced by correlations. 15

arXiv:physics/0004074v1 [physics.comp-ph] 28 Apr 2000A unified approach for the solution of the Fokker-Planck equa tion G. W. Wei Department of Computational Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543 (February 2, 2008) This paper explores the use of a discrete singular convoluti on algorithm as a unified approach for numerical integration of the Fokker-Planck equation. The u nified features of the discrete singular convolution algorithm are discussed. It is demonstrated th at different implementations of the present algorithm, such as global, local, Galerkin, collocation, a nd finite difference, can be deduced from a single starting point. Three benchmark stochastic systems , the repulsive Wong process, the Black- Scholes equation and a genuine nonlinear model, are employe d to illustrate the robustness and to test accuracy of the present approach for the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation via a time- dependent method. An additional example, the incompressib le Euler equation, is used to further validate the present approach for more difficult problems. Nu merical results indicate that the present unified approach is robust and accurate for solving the Fokke r-Planck equation. 1I. INTRODUCTION Much research has been done in the exploration of accurate an d stable computational methods for the numerical solution of the Fokker-Planck equation [1–25]. A detailed c omparison of several different approaches was given by Park and Petrosian [26] (see Ref. [25] for a literature revie w). In fact, the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation, in particular the nonlinear form of this equation, is still a non-trivial problem. In somewhat a broader sense, finding numerical solutions for partial differential equations (PD Es) is still a challenge owing to the presence of possible singularities and/or homoclinic manifolds that induce sha rp transitions in the solutions [27]. These phenomena can be observed in many real systems such as black holes in astron omy, shock waves in compressible fluid flow, vortex sheets in incompressible flow associated with a high Reynold s number, and burst events in the turbulent boundary layer. The difficulties associated with these phenomena can o ften be characterized by sharp changes occurring in a very small spatial region which can strongly influence the g lobal properties of the system. The presence of these phenomena can be extremely sensitive to numerical algorith ms and can easily lead to numerically induced spatial and/or temporal chaos [28]. At present, there are two major c lasses of numerical methods for solving PDEs, namely, global methods and local methods. In global methods, unknow n functions and their derivatives are expanded in terms of a finite basis set with each element having a global support . The expansion coefficients are often determined by the method of tau, or Galerkin, or collocation, or others. In the Tau method, the residual for a truncated expansion is required to be orthogonal to a subset of basis functions us ed in the expansion, which, together with the boundary conditions, determines the expansion coefficients. In the gl obal Galerkin method, a new set of basis functions is constructed by the superposition of the original basis func tions. The requirement of the residual be orthogonal to the new set of basis functions, together with the boundary condi tions, determines the expansion coefficients. In the global collocation approach, the residual vanishes at a subset of n ode points of the highest order basis function used in the expansion. The global collocation is also called pseudospe ctral method. Three most important local approaches are finite difference, finite volume and finite element methods. In finite difference methods, the solution is interpolated in terms of a set of grid values; the spatial derivatives are u sually approximated by algebraic expressions involving nearest neighbor grid points. In finite volume approaches, t he emphasis is on a set of integro-differential equations and their associated surface and volume integrations. The v alues on the boundary of each “numerical molecule” are usually interpolated by low order schemes. The spatial deri vatives are approximated in the same way as those used in the finite difference methods. Finite element methods form one of the most versatile classes of numerical methods. Depending on the system under study, finite element methods c an be formulated either in terms of the method of weight residuals or in terms of variational principles. Usu ally, PDEs are integrated by using a set of trial functions, each with a small region of support. The solution is represen ted by linear superpositions of these trial functions. Global methods are highly localized in their spectral space , but are unlocalized in the coordinate space. By contrast, local methods have high spatial localization, but are deloc alized in their spectral space. In general, global methods a re much more accurate than local methods, while the major advan tage of local methods is their flexibility for handling complex geometries and boundary conditions. Moreover, the use of global methods is usually restricted to structured grids, whereas, local methods can be implemented to block-s tructured grids and even unstructured grids. There were hectic debates among the numerical computation c ommunities over the advantages and disadvantages of various numerical methods in the past a few decades. These debates stimulated the development of powerful numerical methods for a wide variety of science and engineer ing applications. Such development has, in association with the availability of inexpensive high-performance com puters, led to the establishment of numerical simulations a s an alternative approach for researches and applications. T he connection of various numerical methods has always been an important research topic. Finlayson discussed the relat ion between the Galerkin and the Ritz variational principle [29]. Canuto et al rearranged their spectral basis function s so that some global collocation method can be regarded as a special case of certain global Galerkin methods [30]. Fornb erg addressed the common feature between pseudospectral methods and high order finite difference methods [31]. The con nection between global and local methods can also be realized in the framework of the method of weighted residual by choosing trial functions of either piecewise Lagrange polynomials or global Lagrange polynomials. The connectio n of methods of finite element, finite difference and finite volume is now well understood [32]. However, to our knowledg e, none has reported a unified scheme for the discussion of all of the abovementioned methods. In previous work [25], we proposed a discrete singular convo lution (DSC) algorithm and demonstrated its use for the numerical solution of Fokker-Planck equation via eigen function expansions. The DSC algorithm was shown to be a potential numerical approach for Hilbert transform, Ab el transform, Radon transform and delta transform. Three standard problems, the Lorentz Fokker-Planck equati on, the bistable model and the Henon-Heiles system, were utilized to test the accuracy, reliability, and speed of con vergence of the DSC-eigenfunction approach. All results were in excellent agreement with those of previous methods i n the field. Recently, the DSC algorithm has been successfully tested for integrating the sine-Gordon equat ion with initial values close to homoclinic orbits [33], whi ch is 2extremely difficult to compute because of the possible presen ce of numerical chaos [28]. Excellent results are obtained for solving the Navier-Stokes equation and for engineering structural analysis [34]. The purpose of the present paper is twofold. First, we study the unified features of the DSC alg orithm for treating partial differential equations. This is accomplished by focusing on the DSC kernels of the delta ty pe and their approximations. Second, we explore the use of the DSC as a unified approach for solving the Fokker-Pla nck equation via direct explicit time propagations. The eigenfunction expansion approach provides a Schr¨ odin ger-equation type picture for the understanding of the Fokker-Planck equation. However, its use is restricted to a certain class of Fokker-Planck operators (essentially for the Fokker-Planck operators their equivalent Schr¨ odinge r potentials are bounded from below). The present direct approach is applicable to a wider class of problems. These tw o DSC-based approaches have the same level of accuracy for the numerical solution of the Fokker-Planck equation. T hey are complementary to each other for solving a wide variety of Fokker-Planck systems arising from practical si tuations. This paper is organized as the follow. The unified features of the DSC algorithm are discussed in Section II. We demonstrate that, the present DSC algorithm provides a unifi ed framework for solving the Fokker-Planck equation, and partial differential equations in general. In particula r, we show that various different implementations of the DSC algorithm, such as global, local, Galerkin, collocation, a nd finite difference, can be deduced from a single starting point. The application of the present DSC approach to the sol ution of the Fokker-Planck equation and Euler equation is presented in Section III. We use four examples to illustra te the present approach. The first example is the repulsive Wong process which is useful for testing the ability of handl ing monomodality-bimodality transition. The second example is the Black-Scholes equation for option derivativ es. This is interesting stochastic model for option pricing in financial market. The third case treated is a nonlinear stoch astic model which has certain connection to a mean-field model for self-organization processes in biological syste ms such as muscle contraction. Notably, all of these problem s are treated by an explicit time-propagation approach in con trast to the eigenfunction expansion used in our previous work [25]. Since the abovementioned examples are of strong p arabolic type, we consider an additional problem, the incompressible Euler equation, to further validate the DSC approach for more difficult problems. The incompressible Euler equation is chosen because its equations for velocity vector and pressure field are of strong hyperbolic type and elliptic type, respectively. Thus, this last example is com plimentary to other three examples from the point of view of numerical analysis. This paper ends with a discussion. II. PROPERTIES OF THE DISCRETE SINGULAR CONVOLUTION This section presents the properties of the discrete singul ar convolution (DSC) algorithm for solving differential equations. The first subsection addresses the unified featur es of the DSC algorithm in the line of the method of weighted residuals. Relevant properties of DSC trial funct ions are discussed the second subsection. A. Unified features Without the loss of generality, it is assumed that at a fixed ti me, a stochastic process is governed by a differential equation. To solve the differential equation, one can start w ith either by approximating the original differential operator or by approximating the actual solution of the diffe rential equation while maintaining the original differenti al operator. The latter is accomplished by explicitly defining a functional form for approximations. Let us assume that the differential equation has the form Lu(x) =f(x), x∈Ω, (1) where Lis a linear operator and u(x) is the unknown solution of interest. Here f(x) is a known force term, Ω denotes the domain over which the differential equation applies. The approximate solution is sought from a finite set of NDSC trial functions of a given resolution α, denoted by SN,M α,σwithMbeing the half width of support of each element. Here σis aregularization parameter for improving the regularity of the set. The case of regularization free is eas ily obtained by setting σ→ ∞. Elements of the set SN,M α,σ can be explicitly given by {φM α,σ;1, φM α,σ;2, ..., φM α,σ;N}. For a given computational domain, the resolution paramete rα is determined by N. An important property of the DSC trial functions {φM α,σ;k}is that when the trial function is free of regularization, each member of the set is a reproducing kernel at highest resolution lim α→∞< φM α,σ;k, η >=η(xk), (2) 3where <·,·>denotes the standard inner product. In fact, if an appropria te basis is used for φand the limit on σis taken, φof each resolution can be a reproducing kernel for L2functions bandlimited to appropriate sense. In general, we require the low pass filter property that for given α/ne}ationslash= 0, σ/ne}ationslash= 0 and M≫0 < φM α,σ;k, η >≈η(xk). (3) This converges uniformly when the resolution is refined, e.g .,α→ ∞. Many examples of such DSC trial functions are given in Refs. [25] and [36]. Further discussion on these fun ctions is given in the next subsection. Equations (2) and (3) are special requirements satisfied by the DSC kernels of d elta type [25]. In the present DSC approach, an approximation to the functio n of interest u(x) can be expressed as a linear combination UN,M α,σ(x) =N/summationdisplay k=1Uα,σ;kφM α,σ;k(x), (4) where xis an independent variable and Uα,σ;kis a DSC approximation to the solution wanted at point xk. This structure is due to the DSC trial function property (3) and it dramatically simplifies the solution procedure in practical computations. In this formulation, we choose the set SN,M α,σa priori, and then determine the coefficients {Uα,σ;k}so that UN,M α,σ(x) is a good approximation to u(x). To determine Uα,σ;k, we minimize the amount by which UN,M α,σ(x) fails to satisfy the original governing equation (1). A measure of this failu re can be defined as RN,M α,σ(x)≡ LUN,M α,σ(x)−f(x), (5) where RN,M α,σ(x) is the residual for particular choices of resolution, regu larization and half width of the support. Note that Eq. (5) is similar to the usual statement in the method of weighted residuals. However, the approximation UN,M α,σ(x) is constructed by using the DSC trial functions, φM α,σ;k(x), in the present treatment. Let Eq. (1) and its associated boundary conditions be well-posed, then there e xists a unique solution u(x) which generally resides in an infinite-dimensional space. Since the DSC approximation UN,M α,σis constructed from a finite-dimensional set, it is generally the case that UN,M α,σ(x)/ne}ationslash=u(x) and therefore RN,M α,σ(x)/ne}ationslash= 0. Galerkin. We seek to optimize RN,M α,σ(x) by forcing it to zero in a weighted average sense over the domain Ω. A convenient starting point is the Galerkin /integraldisplay ΩRN,M α,σ(x)φM′ α′,σ′;l(x)dx= 0, φM′ α′,σ′;l(x)∈SN′,M′ α′,σ′, (6) where the weight set SN′,M′ α′,σ′can be simply chosen being identical to the DSC trial functio n setSN,M α,σ. We refer Eq. (6) as a DSC-Galerkin statement. Collocation. First, we note that in view of Eq. (2), the present DSC-Galerk in statement reduces to a collocation one at the limit of α′ lim α′→∞/integraldisplay ΩRN,M α,σ(x)φM′ α′,σ′;l(x)dx=RN,M α,σ(xl) = 0, (7) where {xl}is the set of collocation points. However, in digital comput ations, we cannot take the above limits. It follows from the low pass filter property of the DSC trial func tions, Eq. (3), that /integraldisplay ΩRN,M α,σ(x)φM′ α′,σ′;l(x)dx≈RN,M α,σ(xl)≈0. (8) It can be proven that for appropriate choice of SN′,M′ α′,σ′, the first approximation of Eq. (8) converges uniformly. The difference between the true DSC-collocation, lim α′→∞RN,M α,σ(xl) = 0, (9) and the Galerkin induced collocation , (8), diminishes to zero for appropriate DSC trial function s. Global and local. Global approximations to a function and its derivatives are realized typically by a set of truncated L2(a, b) function expansions. It is called global because the value s of a function and its derivatives at a particular 4point xiin the coordinate space involve the fullset of grid points in a computational domain Ω. Whereas a loca l method does so by requiring only a few nearest neighbor point s. In the present DSC approach, since the choices of M and/or M′are independent of N, one can choose Mand/or M′so that a function and its derivatives at a particular point xlare approximated either by the full set of grid points in the c omputational domain Ω or just by a few nearest neighbor grid points. In fact, this freedom for the selectio n ofMendows the DSC algorithm with controllable accuracy for solving differential equations and the flexibility for ha ndling complex geometries. Finite Difference. In the finite difference method, the differential operator is a pproximated by difference operations. In the present approach, the DSC-collocation expression of Eq. (8) is equivalent to a 2 M+ 1 (or 2 M) term finite difference method. This follows from the fact that the DSC app roximation to the nth order derivative of a function can be rewritten as dqu dxq/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle x=xk≈k+M/summationdisplay l=k−Mcq kl,Mu(xl), (10) where cq kl,Mare a set of DSC weights for the finite difference approximatio n and are given by cq kl,M=dq dxqφM α,σ;l(x)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle x=xk. (11) Obviously, for each different choice of φM α,σ, we have a different DSC-finite difference approximation. Hen ce, the present DSC approach is a generalized finite difference metho d. This DSC-finite difference was tested in previous studies [36]. When M= 1, the DSC-finite difference approximation reaches its low o rder limit and the resulting matrix is tridiagonal. In this case, the present DSC weights cq kl,Mcan always be made exactly the same as those of the second order central difference scheme (i.e.1 2∆,0,−1 2∆for the first order derivative and1 ∆2,−2 ∆2,1 ∆2for the second order derivative. Here ∆ is the grid spacing.) of the s tandard finite difference method by appropriately choosing the parameter σ. However, even in this case, the DSC-finite difference approx imation does not have to be the same as the standard finite difference scheme and can be opt imized in a practical application by varying σ. B. DSC trial functions There are many DSC trial functions that satisfy Eq. (3). The r equirement of Eq. (3) can be regarded as an approximate reproducing kernel or quasi reproducing kernel. The reason for using an approxi mate reproducing kernel can be understood from the following analysis of Shannon’s k ernelsin(αx) πx. Shannon’s kernel is a delta sequence lim α→∞sin(αx) πx=δ(x), (12) where δ(x) is the delta distribution which can be regarded as a universal reproducing kernel because its Fourier transform is the unit. However, such a universal reproducin g kernel cannot be directly used in digital computations because it is a distribution (Precisely, it is belongs to Sob olev space of order -1, H−1.) and it does not have a value anywhere in the coordinate space. Therefore, in certain sen se, constructing a reproducing kernel in an appropriate L2(a, b) space is equivalent to finding a sequence of approximation o f the delta distribution in the L2(a, b). In fact, Shannon’s kernel is an element of the Paley-Wiener reproduc ing kernel Hilbert space B2 π f(x) =/integraldisplay∞ −∞f(y)sinπ(x−y) π(x−y)dy, ∀f∈B2 π, (13) where ∀f∈B2 πindicates that, in its Fourier representation, the L2function fvanishes outside the interval [ −π, π]. What is important for digital computations is the fact that t he Paley-Wiener reproducing kernel Hilbert space has a sampling basis Sk(x) Sk(x) =sinπ(x−yk) π(x−yk), yk=k,∀k∈ Z, (14) where symbol Zdenotes the set of all integers. Expression (14) provides a d iscrete representation of every (continuous) function in B2 π 5f(x) =/summationdisplay k∈Zf(yk)Sk(x),∀f∈B2 π. (15) This is Shannon’s sampling theorem and is particularly impo rtant to information theory and the theory of sampling. Note that Shannon’s kernel is obviously interpolative on Z Sn(xm) =δn,m, (16) where δn,mis the Kronecker delta function. Computationally, being in terpolative is of particular importance for numerical accuracy and simplicity. In wavelet analysis,sin(πx) πxis Shannon’s wavelet scaling function and its Fourier trans form is a characteristic function, i.e. it is an unsmoothed, ideallow pass filter. In physical language, it is a projection to th e frequency subband [ −π, π]. By the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, such a (sharp) p rojection must be an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter. The usefulness of such a filter is limit ed because it is de-localized in the coordinate space and requires infinitely many sampling data. In practical com putations, a truncation is required, which leads to large truncation error and even worse, numerical instability. To improve the smoothness and regularity of Shannon’s kernel, we introduce a regularization Φσ(x) =sin(πx) πxRσ(x) (σ >0), (17) where Rσis aregularizer which has properties lim σ→∞Rσ(x) = 1 (18) and Rσ(0) = 1 . (19) Here Eq. (18) is a general condition that a regularizer must s atisfy, while Eq. (19) is specifically for a delta regularizer , which is used in regularizing a delta kernel. Various delta r egularizers can be used for numerical computations. An excellent one is the Gaussian Rσ(x) = exp/bracketleftbigg −x2 2σ2/bracketrightbigg . (20) An immediate benefit of the regularized Shannon’s kernel, Eq . (17), is that its Fourier transform is infinitely differ- entiable because the Gaussian is an element of the Schwartz c lass functions. Qualitatively, all kernels of the Dirichle t type oscillate in the coordinate representation. Specifica lly, Shannon’s kernel has a long tail which is proportional to1 x, whereas, the regularized kernels decay exponentially fas t, especially when the σis very small. In the Fourier representation, regularized Shannon’s kernels have an “op timal” shape in their frequency responses. Of course, they all reduce to Shannon’s low pass filter at the limit lim σ→∞Φσ(x) = lim σ→∞sinπx πxe−x2 2σ2=sinπx πx. (21) Quantitatively, one can examine the normalization of Φ σ(x) /integraldisplay Φσ(x)dx=ˆΦσ(0) =√ 2πσ∞/summationdisplay k=0(−1)k k!(2k+ 1)/parenleftbiggπσ√ 2/parenrightbigg2k (22) = erf/parenleftbiggπσ√ 2/parenrightbigg = 1−/radicalbigg 2 π1 σe−σ2π2 2/integraldisplay∞ 0e−t2 2σ2−πtdt = 1−erfc/parenleftbiggπσ√ 2/parenrightbigg (23) /ne}ationslash= 1, (24) 6where erf( z) =2√π/integraltextz 0e−t2dtis the error function and erfc(z) is the complementary error function. Note that for a given σ >0, erfc(πσ√ 2) is positive definite. Thus, ˆΦσ(0) is always less than unity except at the limit of σ→ ∞. Therefore, Φ σ(x) is no longer a reproducing kernel. However, we argue that Φ σ(x) is an approximate reproducing kernel because when we choose σ≫√ 2/π, which is the case in many practical applications, the resid ue term, erfc(πσ√ 2), approaches zero very quickly. As a result, ˆΦσ(0) is extremely close to unity. As trial functions, regular ized Shannon’s kernels do not form a sampling basis. They are no longer ortho gonal in general. However, they just slightly miss the orthogonality and the requirement of a basis. For numerical computations, it turns out that the approxima te reproducing kernel has much less truncation errors for interpolation and numerical differentiations. Qian and the present author [37] have recently given the following theorem for truncation errors. Theorem Letfbe a function f∈L2(R)∩Cs(R) and bandlimited to B, (B <π ∆,∆ is the grid spacing). For a fixed t∈Randσ >0, denote g(x) =f(x)Hk(t−x√ 2σ), where Hk(x) is the kth order Hermite polynomial. If g(x) satisfies g′(x)≤g(x)(x−t) σ2(25) forx≥t+ (M1−1)∆, and g′(x)≥g(x)(x−t) σ2(26) forx≤t−M2∆, where M1, M2∈ N, then for any s∈ Z+ /vextenddouble/vextenddouble/vextenddouble/vextenddouble/vextenddouble/vextenddoublef(s)(t)−⌈t ∆⌉+M1/summationdisplay n=⌈t ∆⌉−M2f(n∆)/bracketleftbiggsinπ ∆(t−n∆) π ∆(t−n∆)exp(−(t−n∆)2 2σ2)/bracketrightbigg(s)/vextenddouble/vextenddouble/vextenddouble/vextenddouble/vextenddouble/vextenddouble L2(R) ≤√ 3/bracketleftBigg /ba∇dblf(s)(t)/ba∇dblL2(R) 2πσ(π ∆−B)exp(σ2(π ∆−B)2 2) +/ba∇dblf(t)/ba∇dblL2(R)/summationtext i+j+k=ss!πi−1Hk(−M1∆√ 2σ) i!k!∆i−1(√ 2σ)k((M1−1)∆)j+1 exp((M1∆)2 2σ2) +/ba∇dblf(t)/ba∇dblL2(R)/summationtext i+j+k=ss!πi−1Hk(−M2∆√ 2σ) i!k!∆i−1(√ 2σ)k(M2∆)j+1 exp((M2∆)2 2σ2) , (27) where superscript, ( s), denotes the sth order derivative. The proof and detailed discussion (inc luding a comparison with the truncation errors of Shannon’s sampling theorem) a re given in Ref. [37] and are beyond the scope of this paper. This theorem provides a guide to the choice of M,σand ∆. For example, in the case of interpolation ( s= 0), if theL2norm error is set to 10−η(η >0), the following relations can be deduced from Eq. (27) r(π−B∆)>/radicalbig 4.61η, (28) and M r>/radicalbig 4.61η, (29) where r=σ/∆ (The choice of σis always proportional to ∆ so that the width of the Gaussian e nvelope varies with the central frequency). The first inequality states that for a given grid size ∆, a large ris required for approximating high frequency component of an L2function. The second inequality indicates that if one choos es the ratio r= 3, then the half bandwidth M∼30 can be used to ensure the highest accuracy in a double preci sion computation ( η= 15). However, for lower accuracy requirement, a much smaller hal f bandwidth can be used. In general, the value of ris proportional to M. The use of Mvalues is determined by the accuracy requirement. This theo retical estimation is in excellent agreement with a previous numerical test [36]. 7III. ILLUSTRATIVE CALCULATIONS In this section, we illustrate the use of the present approac h for solving the Fokker-Planck equation and the incompressible Euler equation. Many DSC kernels are discus sed in the previous work [25,36] and they can be used as the DSC trial functions. For simplicity, we focus on three DS C kernels, a regularized Shannon’s kernel (RSK), φMπ ∆,σ;k(x) =sinπ ∆(x−xk) π ∆(x−xk)exp/bracketleftbigg −(x−xk)2 2σ2/bracketrightbigg , (30) a regularized Dirichlet kernel (RDK), φMπ ∆,σ;k(x) =sin/bracketleftbigπ ∆(x−xk)/bracketrightbig (2m+ 1)sin/bracketleftBig π ∆x−xk 2m+1/bracketrightBigexp/bracketleftbigg −(x−xk)2 2σ2/bracketrightbigg , (31) and a regularized Lagrange kernel (RLK) φMπ ∆,σ;k(x) =2m/productdisplay i/n⌉gationslash=kx−xi xk−xiexp/bracketleftbigg −(x−xk)2 2σ2/bracketrightbigg , (32) for our numerical test. Note that the resolution is given by α=π ∆which is the frequency bound in the Fourier representation. The goal of this section is to test the prese nt method for the solutions of the Fokker-Planck equation via time propagation and the incompressible Euler equation . For the numerical solution of the Fokker-Planck equation, we choose σ= 3.8∆ for the RSK and RDK, σ= 2.8∆ for the RLK, with π/∆ being the resolution. In fact, a wide range of σvalues can be used to deliver excellent results. The half ban dwidth, M, can be chosen to interplay between the local limit and the global limit and is set to 40 in all calc ulations. Finally, mcontrols the order of the regularized Dirichlet and Lagrange kernels and is set to 40 in all calcula tions (note that the selection of mis independent of the grid used in the computation). It is noted that all of the abov ementioned DSC trial functions are of Schwartz class and are capable of auto-regularizing when used as integral k ernels. The fourth order explicit Runge-Kutta scheme is used for time discretization. Details of these computation s are described in the first three subsections. For treating the incompressible Euler equation, many other DSC paramete rs are tested as indicated in the last subsection. Double precision is used in all calculations. A. The repulsive Wong process One of important stochastic systems is the repulsive Wong pr ocess [38–40,20], given by dx= 2γtanh(x)dt+√ 2dFt, (33) where dFtis the Gaussian white noise which has the standard statistic al properties < dF t>= 0 (34) and < dF t, dFτ>=δ(|t−τ|). (35) The repulsive Wong process is Markovian due to the deriving G aussian white noise term. Its transition probability density is governed by the Fokker-Planck equation of the for m [38–40] ∂f(x, t) ∂t=−2γ∂[tanh( x)f(x, t)] ∂x+∂2f(x, t) ∂x2, (36) with the usual initial condition f(x,0) =δ(x−x0), (37) and the normalization 8/integraldisplay∞ −∞f(x, t)dt= 1. (38) Forγ= 1, the solution [39,40] of the Fokker-Planck equation (36) is analytically given by (for x0= 0) f(x, t) =1 2√ 4πt/bracketleftbigg e−(x−x−)2 4t+e−(x−x+)2 4t/bracketrightbigg , (39) where x±=±2tare centers of two moving Gaussians. Here the superposition of two Gaussians gives rise to a monomodality-bimodality transition as time increases. Th e Wong process is useful for illustrating the connection between stochastic processes and quantum measurements. It is also useful for distinguishing spectrum differences between the Master equation and its Fokker-Planck equation approximations. The accurate simulation of the Wong process is not a simple ta sk because of the monomodality-bimodality transition. Two Gaussian peaks centered at x±=±2tmove apart as time increases. The computational domain is to be sufficiently large in order to avoid boundary reflection (Othe rwise, more complicated techniques, such as absorption boundaries, are to be implemented.). In the present computa tions, the resolution is chosen asπ ∆= 10π. The initial functions are approximated by a unit impulse function locat ed at 0. The equation (36) is integrated up to 10 time units with a time increment of 0.001. The errors for a wide ran ge of propagation times are listed in TABLE I and are measured by error norms of L2andL∞. It is seen that the present unified approach is extremely acc urate and reaches machine precision. All of the DSC kernels behave very simila r to each other and provide the same level of accuracy and speed of convergence. In fact, other DSC kernels, such as regularized modified Dirichlet kernel, provide similar results. The results of the RSK and RDK are slightly more accu rate than those of the RLK. It is evident that the present unified method, in associated with the DSC trial func tions, is capable of delivering extremely high accuracy and numerical stability for the Wong process. To our knowled ge, the DSC solution for this system is the best to the date. B. The Black-Scholes equation The Fokker-Planck equation and stochastic analysis have in teresting applications in mathematical modeling of financial market option pricing. Consider a writer of a Europ ean call option on a stock, he is exposed to the risk of unlimited liability if the stock price rises acutely above t he strike price. To protect his short position in the option, he should consider purchasing certain amount of stock so tha t the loss in the short position in the option is offset by the long position in the stock. In this way, he is adopting a he dging procedure. A hedge position combines an option with its underlying asset so as to achieve the goal that eithe r the stock protects the option against loss or the option protects the stock against loss. This risk-monitoring stra tegy has been commonly used by practitioners in financial markets. The most well-known stochastic model for the equil ibrium condition between the expected return on the option, the expected return on the stock and the riskless int erest rate is the Black-Scholes equation [41] ∂c ∂t=ν2 2S2∂2c ∂S2+rS∂c ∂S−rc, (40) where Sis the asset price which undergoes geometric Brownian motio n,c(S, t) the call price, νthe volatility and r the constant riskless interest rate. Black-Scholes equati on is a fundamental equation in finance and economics and is also an excellent example application of stochastic analys is. By a simple transformation x= lnS, (41) and f(x, t) =ertc(x, t), (42) the Black-Scholes equation is transformed into the Fokker- Planck equation of the standard form ∂f ∂t=/parenleftbigg r−ν2 2/parenrightbigg∂f ∂x+ν2 2∂2f ∂x2. (43) The numerical simulation of the Black-Scholes equation and its generalized versions is an important issue in financial analysis and computational finance community [42–45]. Esse ntially, all existing numerical methods are tested for potential usefulness in estimating the option derivatives because both computational accuracy and efficiency are very 9important to option modeling and risk estimation. In the pre sent time-dependent approach, the resolution is set to π ∆= 2πand the time increment is chosen as 0.01. For simplicity, we c hooseν2 2= 0.5 and r= 0.7 in our calculations. We chosen our initial distribution as a unit impulse functio n located at x= 0, which is a poor approximation to the true delta distribution. Obviously, had one started with a s mooth initial function, or used a denser grid, one would have obtained much higher accuracy at earlier times as well. We have verified this computationally, but these results are not presented. Both L2andL∞error analyses are used to evaluate the quality of the DSC app roach, the results of which are listed in TABLE II. To our knowledge, the present time-dependent DSC approach provides the most accurate numerical results yet obtained for the Black-Scho les equation. As in the first example, three DSC kernels provide extremely s imilar results in solving the Black-Scholes equation. This is not an isolated coincidence. In fact, we can come up a n umber of other DSC kernels with all of their results being very similar to those of the present three kernels. C. A nonlinear stochastic model To illustrate the accuracy and robustness of the present app roach further, we choose the following nonlinear stochas- tic model ∂f(x, t) ∂t=∂[(ωx+θ < x(t)>)f(x, t)] ∂x+D∂2f(x, t) ∂x2, (44) where < x(t)>is the first moment of the distribution function < x(t)>=/integraldisplay∞ −∞xf(x, t)dx, (45) andω, θandDare constant. The initial probability distribution is also given by f(x,0) =δ(x−x0). (46) Equation (44) is a true nonlinear stochastic model since the instantaneous position average depends on the distributio n function. This is one of few analytically soluble nonlinear systems which are very valuable for testing new numerical approaches. For example, Drozdov and Morillo have recently employed this system to test their K-point Stirling interpolation formula finite difference method [23]. The exa ct solution to Eq. (44) is f(x, t) =1/radicalbig 2πν(t)exp/bracketleftbigg −(x−< x(t)>)2 2ν(t)/bracketrightbigg , (47) where < x(t)>andν(t) are analytically given by < x(t)>=x0e−(ω+θ)t(48) and ν(t) =D ω/parenleftbig 1−e−2ωt/parenrightbig , (49) respectively. Obviously, ν(t) is the theoretical value of the second moment M2(t) M2(t) =< x2(t)>−< x(t)>2, (50) which can also be used as a measure of computational accuracy . In the present computations, the resolution is chosen asπ ∆=239 20π. The time increment is taken as ∆ t= 0.005. In this example, the errors are measured by error norms of L1andL∞from which all other error norms, such as the L2error norm, can be interpolated. The L1andL∞errors are listed in TABLE III, for D= 0.1, ω= 1, θ= 2 and x0= 2.0422. The initial accuracy of computations is hindered by th e poor approximation of the impulse function to the Dirac delta function. However, the auto-regularizat ion property of the Schwartz class trial functions enables the numerical integration to stabilize at smooth solution a nd eventually reach the machine precision at a slightly late time. 10D. The Euler equation All cases considered in the last three subsections are of str ong parabolic type with a solution which becomes more and more flat and smooth as time increases. In this subsection , we consider an additional problem, the incompressible Euler equation, to confirm that the results obtained for the F okker-Planck equation are not due to the parabolic nature. We also use this example to demonstrate the inter-connectio n between the collocation and the finite difference, and between the local and the global. It is hoped that this additi onal example helps to build confidence for using the DSC approach for treating more difficult problems. Conceptua lly and numerically, it is convenient to describe the incompressible Euler equation from the point of view of the i ncompressible Navier-Stokes equation ∂v ∂t+v· ∇v=∇p+1 Re∇2v, (51) ∇ ·v= 0, (52) where vis the velocity field vector, pis the pressure field and Re is the Reynolds number. The Euler e quation is attained by setting Re= ∞. Finding a general solution to the Euler equation is not an ea sy job. In the present study, we consider a solution domain of [0 ,2π]×[0,2π] with periodic boundary conditions. Under such a constrain t, the Navier-Stokes equation (51) exists an exact solution u(x, y, t) =−cos(x)sin(y)e−2t Re v(x, y, t) = sin( x)cos(y)e−2t Re p(x, y, t) =−1 4[cos(2 x) + cos(2 y)]e−4t Re, (53) where ( u, v) are the velocity components in the x-direction and y-direction, respectively. Note that, for the Euler equation, the solution (53) does not decay with time. In the present study, we use a standard approach for treating the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation, i.e. deriving a Poisson equation for the pressure from the incomp ressible condition. The velocity fields are iterated by using the implicit Euler scheme. At time tn+1, there are two coupled equations for the velocity fields /parenleftbigg1 Re∇2−1 ∆t/parenrightbigg un+1=pn+1/2 x +Sn x (54) /parenleftbigg1 Re∇2−1 ∆t/parenrightbigg vn+1=pn+1/2 y +Sn y, (55) and a Poisson equation for the pressure ∇2pn+1/2=Sn p. (56) HereSn x, Sn yandSn pare given by Sn x=−un ∆t+ (unun x+vnun y) Sn y=−vn ∆t+ (unvn x+vnvn y) Sn p=1 ∆t(un x+vn y)−(un x)2−(vn y)2−2un yvn x. (57) At each time tn+1, the pressure field pn+1/2is solved according Eq. (56) from the known velocity field vec tor (un, vn). The velocity field vector ( un+1, vn+1) is then updated according to Eqs. (54) and (55). These linea r algebraic equations are solved by using a standard (LU decomposition) solver. The derivatives in Eqs. (54-56) are computed by using the gen eralized finite difference scheme, Eq. (10), and the required finite difference weights are given by Eq. (11). The i nvolved trial functions, φM α,σ, are given by the regularized Shannon’s kernel (RSK) [Eq. (30)], the regularized Dirichl et kernel (RDK) [Eq. (31)], and the regularized Lagrange kernel (RLK) [Eq. (32)]. Here m= 40 is used for both RDK and RLK. We choose a small time increme nt (∆t= 0.001) so that the main error is caused by the spatial discretizatio n. The number of grid points in each dimension is chosen asN= 4,8,16 and 32 in various test calculations. The αvalue is specified as α=π ∆=π 2π N−1=N−1 2. For a given N, the matrix half bandwidth, M, can be chosen as M≤N. In particular, if M=N, the approach has a global (full) 11computational matrix. For all M < N , the matrix is banded. In the present DSC approach, the conne ction between the global and the local can be easily achieved by selecting a nMvalue for a given N. In particular, if M≪N, the DSC approach behaves truly like a finite difference scheme. To achieve optimal (or near optimal) accuracy, the σis chosen in proportional to Mand ∆. When M= 32,16,8,4,2 and 1,σ ∆are chosen as 3.2, 2.5, 1.8, 1.2, 0.9 and 0.6 for both RSK and RDK, and 2.8, 2.0, 1.6 1.0 0.8 and 0.6 for RLK. We co mpute the L2andL∞errors of ufor a number of combinations of NandMand the results are listed in TABLE IV for 4 different times ( t= 0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0). A good consistent in accuracy among solutions at different tim es (or equivalently, over 2000 iterations) is observed. The DSC results are quite accurate when N=M= 4 and are of machine precision when N=M= 32. It is interesting to note that for fixed M= 4, the results of N= 32 and N= 4 differ little in accuracy. We also checked the DSC-finite difference approximation at the tridiagonal matrix limit ( M= 1) and the result is very good for N= 4 (i.e. a total of 4 interior points in a (2 π)2box). IV. DISCUSSION The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the unified featur es of the discrete singular convolution (DSC) algorithm [25]. It is found that the implementations of the DSC algorit hm into a number of computational methods can be deduced from a single starting point, the method of weighted residual. This chain of deduction provides a unified approach for solving the Fokker-Planck equation and other d ifferential equations in general. Some of these deduction relations are novel to our knowledge. We demonstrate that by adjusting the support of the DSC trial functions, the DSC algorithm can be easily im- plemented either as a local method or as a global method. For t his reason, the present DSC approach has global method’s accuracy while maintains local method’s flexibili ty for handling complex boundary and geometry. In fact, the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation of a previous pap er [25] was obtained by using the global limit. Whereas, in the present computations, a local approximation is used f or all Fokker-Planck problems. A comparison between global and local DSC treatments is given in solving the Euler equation. We also show that the DSC implementations of Galerkin and col location are computationally equivalent, i. e. the collocation, Eq. (8) can be deduced from the Galerkin, Eq. (6 ) because of the choice of the DSC trial functions. Galerkin methods have a profound influence to the theory of ap proximations. Both spectral methods and finite element methods are often formulated in the framework of the Galerkin approach. There has been a great deal of argument about advantage and disadvantage of the Galerkin i n comparison to many other methods. The present DSC approach might provide a unified framework for the discus sion of these methods. The present Galerkin-induced collocation scheme provides a nature base for the realization of finite difference methods. High order finite difference is not a new idea in numer ical approximations [31]. However, the mathematical constructions of high order finite difference schemes often b ecome too cumbersome to use in practical applications as the order increases. The present DSC approach provides a sim ple, systematic algorithm for the generation of finite difference schemes of an arbitrary order. The implementatio n of this finite difference is demonstrated in solving the Euler equation with a number of different matrix bandwidths. Recently, wavelet theory and techniques have had great succ ess in signal processing, data compression, and telecom- munication. Two most important features of the wavelet theo ry are multiresolution analysis and time-frequency lo- calization. Their potential applications in solving parti al differential equations have been extensively explored [4 6–51] in hope to come up with unified approaches for numerical appro ximations. However, before wavelet approaches can be of practical use, a number of technical difficulties are to b e overcome. In our view, the first difficulty is the imple- mentation of boundary conditions in a multiresolution sett ing. The second difficulty is the requirement of sufficiently high wavelet regularity to provide sufficiently weak solutio ns. Moreover, there is a lack of general and systematic numerical algorithms for incorporating wavelets in an effici ent manner. Nevertheless, the wavelet multiresolution analysis still has great potential for developing adaptive grid and multigrid algorithms. The present DSC algorithm is closely related to the wavelet theory [25,36]. In fact, th e DSC kernels have a feature in common with wavelets in terms of time-frequency (position-momentum) localizatio n. However, unlike in a wavelet algorithm, multiresolution analysis is feasible but it is not required in the DSC algorit hm. In contrast to our earlier work dealing with the application of the DSC approach to the Fokker-Planck equation via an eigenfunction expansion [25], we have explored in this pa per a DSC-based time-propagation approach for solving the Fokker-Planck equation. Three typical DSC kernels, the regularized Shannon’s kernel (RSK), the regularized Dirichlet kernel (RDK), and the regularized Lagrange kerne l (RLK), are used as trial functions in the framework of the present method. Four benchmark examples are chosen to de monstrate the usefulness and to test the accuracy of the present DSC approach. The first example is the repulsiv e Wong process. This is used for objectively testing the ability of handling the monomodality-bimodality trans ition. The Wong process requires a large computational 12domain to ensure that the boundary reflection of density flux h as little influence in a highly accurate computation. By using reasonable resolution, regularization and a quite large time increment, the present approach performs very well in characterizing the transition. In fact, the present unified approach delivers machine accuracy at an early time. The Black-Scholes equation of option pricing was chosen as t he second numerical example. This financial equation can be regarded as a reaction-diffusion equation, although, its derivation was entirely based stochastic analysis. By using a simple transformation, the Black-Scholes equation is converted into the standard form of the Fokker-Planck equation which admits an analytical solution. The present n umerical results for the Black-Scholes equation are obtained by using three different DSC kernels with a reasonab le resolution and relatively large time mesh. The extremely high accuracy in the present calculation indicat es that the DSC-based unified algorithm is a valuable potential approach for various option pricing simulations . The third example treated is a nonlinear stochastic model. T he effective potential of the corresponding Fokker- Planck equation is time depended through the first order mome nt of the transition probability density. Despite of the nonlinearity and poor approximation of the initial dens ity distribution, the numerical solutions quickly settle t o a smooth, stable and correct distribution after a few iterat ions. This is due to the fact that the DSC trial functions are chosen as Schwartz class functions and they are capable o f auto-regularizing when used as integration kernels. Our results are of machine precision at a relatively late tim e. To our knowledge, this is the best numerical solution to this nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation to the date. These illustrative calculations indicate that the present unifie d approach is extremely accurate, efficient and robust for nume rical simulations of stochastic systems. A common feature in the abovementioned Fokker-Planck equat ion is that the equation is of strong parabolic type and the solution decays as time increases. Therefore, it is n ecessary to employ an additional example to validate the present DSC algorithm further for handling more complicate d partial differential equations. To this end, we choose the incompressible Euler equation with its velocity field equat ions being of strong hyperbolic type and a derived equation for the pressure being of elliptic type. A standard implicit Euler scheme is used for the time discretization and at each time tn+1, linear algebraic equations are constructed by using the co llocation method. In the present approach, carrying out differentiations in the collocation is equival ent to implementing the finite difference weights computed from the DSC trial functions. We test the DSC algorithm by usi ng 4, 8, 16 and 32 grid points in each dimension in association with many different half matrix bandwidths ( M= 4, 8, 16 and 32). As expected, the DSC algorithm achieves its highest accuracy at the global limit ( M=N) for each given N. The machine precision is reached when N=M= 32. Very good results are also obtained for many banded matr ix calculations. We believe that the feature of being able to provide both global and local approximation s in one formulation is of practical importance for large scale computations. Although this paper emphasizes the connection of a few compu tational methods and the unified features of the DSC approach, it claims neither that all computational meth ods are the same, nor that the DSC algorithm engulfs all methods. For example, it is still not clear whether the DS C algorithm is applicable in adaptive and unstructured grids (progress is made on a DSC-multigrid method). The read er is urged to keep the distinction of various methods in mind and maintain a perspective. Acknowledgment This work was supported in part by the National University of Singapore. The author is grateful to the referee for valuable comments and suggestions. References 1. Suzuki M 1981 Adv. Chem. Phys. 46, 195 2. Risken H 1984 The Fokker-Planck equation: methods of solution and applic ation (Springer-Verlag) 3. Caroli B, Caroli C and Roulet B 1979 J. Stat. Phys. 2126 (1979). 4. Larson R S and Kostin M 1978 J. Chem. Phys. 694821 5. Indira R, Valsakumar M C, Murthy K P N and Ananthakrishna G 1 981J. Stat. Phys. 33181 6. Wehner M F and Wolfer W G 1983 Phys. Rev. A 272663 7. Brand H, Schenzle A and Schr¨ oder G 1982 Phys. Rev. A 252324 8. Shizgal B 1981 J. Comput. Phys. 41309 9. Blackmore R and Shizgal B 1985 Phys. Rev. A 311855 10. Kometani K and Shimizu H 1975 J. Stat. Phys. 13473 1311. Brey J J, Casado J M and Morillo M 1984 Physica A 128597 12. Haken H 1975 Rev. Mod. Phys. 47175 13. Grabert H and Green M S 1979 Phys. Rev. A 191747 14. Dekker H 1979 Phys. Rev. A 192102 15. Frisch H L and Nowakowski B 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 988963 16. Mu˜ noz M A and Garrido P L 1994 Phys. Rev. E 502458 17. Kho T H 1985 Phys. Rev. A 3266 18. Ermak D L and Buckholtz H 1980 J. Comput. Phys. 35169 19. Forsythe G E and Wasow W R 1967 Finite Difference Methods for Partial Differential Equation s(New York: Wiley) 20. Palleschi V, Sarri F, Marcozzi G and Torquati M R 1990 Phys. Lett. A 146378 21. Chang J S and Cooper G 1970 J. Comput. Phys. 61 22. Larson E W, Levermore C D, Pomraning G C and Sanderson J G 19 85J. Comput. Phys. 61359 23. Drozdov A N and Morillo M 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54931 24. Epperlein E M 1994 J. Comput. Phys. 112291 25. Wei G W 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 1108930 26. Park B T and Petrosian V 1996 Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 103255 27. Kadanoff L P 1997 Phys. Today 50(9) 11 28. Ablowitz M J, Herbst B M and Schober C 1996 J. Comput. Phys. 126299 29. Finlayson B A 1972 The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principle s(New York: Academic Press) 30. Canuto C, Hussaini M Y, Quarteroni A and Zang T A 1988 Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) 31. Fornberg B 1996 A practical guide to pseudospectral methods (Cambridge University Press) 32. Dow J O 1999 A Unified Approach to the Finite Element Method and Error Anal ysis Procedures (San Diego: Academic Press) 33. Wei G W 2000 Physica D 137247 34. Wei G W 2000 Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng. in press 35. Schwartz L 1951 Th´ eore des Distributions (Paris: Hermann) 36. Wei G W 1998 Chem. Phys. Lett. 296215 37. Qian L W and Wei G W J. Approx. Theor. submitted. 38. Wong E 1964 in Am. Math. Soc. Proc. of the 16th Symposium on Appl. Math. 264 39. Gisin N 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 521657 40. Hongler M O and Desai R 1986 Helv. Phys. Acta 59367 41. Black F and Scholes M, 1973 J. Political Economy 81637; Kwok Y K 1998 Mathematical Models of Financial Derivatives (Springer Finance) 42. Boyle P, Broadie M and Glasserman P 1997 J. Economic Dynamics and Control 211267 1443. Brennan M J and Schwartz E S 1978 J. Financial Quantitative Analysis 13461 44. Tian Y 1993 J. Futures Markets 13563 45. Cox J C, Ross R and Rubinstein M J. Financial Economics 7229 46. Dahmen W and Kunoth A 1992 Numer. Math. 63315 47. Schult R L and Wyld H W 1992 Phys. Rev. A 4612 48. Qian S and Weiss J 1993 J. Comput. Phys. 106155 49. Jawerth B and Swelden W SIAM Rev. 36377 50. Vasilyev O V, Paolucci S and Sen M 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 12033 51. Beylkin G and Keiser J M 1997 J. Comput. Phys. 132233 15TABLE I. Errors for solving the repulsive Wong process RSK RDK RLK Time L2 L∞ L2 L∞ L2 L∞ 0.10 1.94(-09) 2.32(-09) 1.94(-09) 2.32(-09) 1.94(-09) 2.32(-09) 0.25 4.67(-11) 3.73(-11) 4.67(-11) 3.73(-11) 4.67(-11) 3.72(-11) 0.50 3.47(-12) 2.05(-12) 3.47(-12) 2.05(-12) 3.47(-12) 2.03(-12) 0.75 8.76(-13) 4.89(-13) 8.76(-13) 4.95(-13) 8.83(-13) 4.60(-13) 1.00 3.57(-13) 1.83(-13) 3.57(-13) 1.91(-13) 3.78(-13) 1.91(-13) 2.00 6.29(-14) 2.69(-14) 5.92(-14) 3.00(-14) 2.18(-13) 8.92(-14) 3.00 4.72(-14) 2.04(-14) 3.60(-14) 1.63(-14) 2.86(-13) 9.76(-14) 4.00 5.23(-14) 1.97(-14) 3.76(-14) 1.39(-14) 3.53(-13) 1.12(-13) 5.00 4.44(-14) 1.19(-14) 3.16(-14) 1.12(-14) 4.10(-13) 1.21(-13) 6.00 5.87(-14) 1.88(-14) 5.23(-14) 1.64(-14) 4.68(-13) 1.32(-13) 7.00 7.63(-14) 2.38(-14) 7.30(-14) 2.16(-14) 5.25(-13) 1.43(-13) 8.00 9.27(-14) 2.78(-14) 9.08(-14) 2.58(-14) 5.80(-13) 1.54(-13) 9.00 7.19(-14) 1.99(-14) 6.24(-14) 1.79(-14) 6.33(-13) 1.63(-13) 10.0 6.98(-14) 1.70(-14) 5.25(-14) 1.39(-14) 6.87(-13) 1.73(-13) 16TABLE II. Errors for the numerical solution of the Black-Sch oles equation RSK RDK RLK Time L2 L∞ L2 L∞ L2 L∞ 1 1.85(-03) 1.14(-03) 1.83(-03) 1.12(-03) 2.18(-03) 1.41(-03) 2 1.19(-04) 8.55(-05) 1.18(-04) 8.45(-05) 1.42(-04) 1.06(-04) 3 4.57(-06) 2.89(-06) 4.48(-06) 2.84(-06) 6.44(-06) 4.29(-06) 4 2.53(-07) 1.68(-07) 2.46(-07) 1.63(-07) 4.23(-07) 2.84(-07) 5 1.81(-08) 1.15(-08) 1.75(-08) 1.10(-08) 3.66(-08) 2.43(-08) 6 1.63(-09) 1.09(-09) 1.56(-09) 1.04(-09) 4.02(-09) 2.74(-09) 7 1.81(-10) 1.26(-10) 1.71(-10) 1.19(-10) 5.48(-10) 3.92(-10) 8 2.41(-11) 1.59(-11) 2.25(-11) 1.48(-11) 9.03(-11) 6.05(-11) 9 3.83(-12) 2.55(-12) 3.54(-12) 2.37(-12) 1.76(-11) 1.15(-11) 10 7.82(-13) 6.25(-13) 7.30(-13) 5.85(-13) 4.01(-12) 2.84(-12) 20 4.86(-14) 2.70(-14) 4.91(-14) 2.78(-14) 4.84(-14) 2.74(-14) 17TABLE III. Errors for solving the nonlinear model RSK RDK RLK Time L1 L∞ L1 L∞ L1 L∞ 1 4.13(-01) 3.09(-02) 6.46(-01) 4.71(-02) 4.67(-02) 3.98(-03) 2 4.66(-01) 3.68(-02) 7.41(-01) 5.86(-02) 2.48(-03) 2.27(-04) 3 2.03(-01) 1.68(-02) 3.26(-01) 2.68(-02) 7.24(-04) 6.51(-05) 4 4.88(-02) 4.92(-03) 7.97(-02) 8.04(-03) 1.23(-04) 1.31(-05) 5 7.41(-03) 7.84(-04) 1.22(-02) 1.29(-03) 1.68(-05) 1.82(-06) 6 1.02(-03) 1.12(-04) 1.68(-03) 1.84(-04) 2.26(-06) 2.48(-07) 7 1.38(-04) 1.52(-05) 2.28(-04) 2.50(-05) 3.06(-07) 3.36(-08) 8 1.87(-05) 2.05(-06) 3.09(-05) 3.38(-06) 4.14(-08) 4.54(-09) 9 2.53(-06) 2.77(-07) 4.17(-06) 4.58(-07) 5.59(-09) 6.13(-10) 10 3.42(-07) 3.75(-08) 5.65(-07) 6.19(-08) 7.56(-10) 8.29(-11) 20 3.64(-14) 3.11(-15) 4.75(-14) 4.88(-15) 1.00(-13) 1.51(-14) 18TABLE IV. Errors for solving the Euler equation RSK RDK RLK N M Time L1 L∞ L1 L∞ L1 L∞ 4 1 0.5 3.16(-2) 6.12(-2) 3.15(-2) 6.12(-2) 3.09(-2) 6.01(-2) 1.0 3.10(-2) 6.02(-3) 3.09(-2) 6.01(-3) 3.03(-2) 5.88(-3) 1.5 3.06(-2) 5.90(-3) 3.05(-2) 5.89(-3) 2.99(-2) 5.73(-3) 2.0 3.04(-2) 5.77(-3) 3.04(-2) 5.76(-3) 2.99(-2) 5.57(-3) 2 0.5 1.27(-2) 2.48(-3) 1.27(-2) 2.48(-3) 1.29(-2) 2.44(-3) 1.0 3.10(-2) 6.02(-3) 1.31(-2) 2.66(-3) 1.29(-2) 2.54(-3) 1.5 1.37(-2) 2.86(-3) 1.37(-2) 2.87(-3) 1.32(-2) 2.66(-3) 2.0 1.44(-2) 3.08(-3) 1.45(-2) 3.08(-3) 1.35(-2) 2.78(-3) 4 0.5 9.33(-3) 1.70(-3) 9.32(-3) 1.69(-3) 9.34(-3) 1.70(-3) 1.0 9.43(-3) 1.79(-3) 9.42(-3) 1.79(-3) 9.44(-3) 1.79(-3) 1.5 9.62(-3) 1.88(-3) 9.61(-3) 1.88(-3) 9.64(-3) 1.88(-3) 2.0 9.92(-3) 1.96(-3) 9.91(-3) 1.95(-3) 9.93(-3) 1.96(-3) 8 8 0.5 1.30(-4) 4.26(-5) 1.33(-4) 4.36(-5) 1.24(-4) 3.40(-5) 1.0 1.52(-4) 5.13(-5) 1.54(-4) 5.25(-5) 1.54(-4) 4.79(-5) 1.5 1.82(-4) 6.10(-5) 1.83(-4) 6.26(-5) 1.92(-4) 5.66(-5) 2.0 2.17(-4) 7.13(-5) 2.16(-4) 7.32(-5) 2.34(-4) 6.72(-5) 16 16 0.5 6.30(-10) 2.37(-10) 6.75(-10) 2.76(-10) 1.23(-8) 3.63(-9) 1.0 6.76(-10) 2.40(-10) 6.82(-10) 2.87(-10) 1.56(-8) 5.16(-9) 1.5 8.00(-10) 2.65(-10) 7.57(-10) 3.18(-10) 1.99(-8) 6.76(-9) 2.0 9.68(-10) 3.35(-10) 8.81(-10) 3.49(-10) 2.48(-8) 8.53(-9) 32 4 0.5 5.25(-4) 2.10(-4) 5.24(-4) 2.10(-4) 2.37(-3) 7.14(-4) 1.0 7.40(-4) 2.88(-4) 7.41(-4) 2.90(-4) 2.96(-3) 1.00(-3) 1.5 1.04(-3) 4.25(-4) 1.04(-3) 4.27(-4) 3.75(-3) 1.33(-3) 2.0 1.40(-3) 5.87(-4) 1.40(-3) 5.89(-4) 4.62(-3) 1.67(-3) 8 0.5 1.78(-6) 7.32(-7) 1.93(-6) 7.95(-7) 9.50(-7) 3.05(-7) 1.0 2.41(-6) 1.06(-6) 2.62(-6) 1.15(-6) 1.24(-6) 5.22(-7) 1.5 3.23(-6) 1.39(-6) 3.51(-6) 1.51(-6) 1.64(-6) 7.73(-7) 2.0 4.17(-6) 1.79(-6) 4.52(-6) 1.92(-6) 2.09(-6) 1.03(-6) 16 0.5 6.95(-11) 2.93(-11) 9.52(-11) 4.00(-11) 1.90(-10) 5.73(-11) 1.0 7.48(-11) 3.23(-11) 1.03(-10) 4.42(-11) 2.40(-10) 8.15(-11) 1.5 8.06(-11) 3.51(-11) 1.11(-10) 4.81(-11) 3.04(-10) 1.08(-10) 2.0 8.67(-11) 3.79(-11) 1.19(-10) 5.19(-11) 3.76(-10) 1.36(-10) 32 0.5 1.02 (-14) 6.99(-15) 1.36(-14) 1.21(-14) 1.10(-14) 7.88(-15) 1.0 2.03(-14) 1.45(-14) 2.51(-14) 1.80(-14) 2.22(-14) 1.54(-14) 1.5 2.98(-14) 1.88(-14) 3.68(-14) 2.74(-14) 3.54(-14) 2.22(-14) 2.0 4.05(-14) 2.31(-14) 5.04(-14) 3.13(-14) 4.80(-14) 3.12(-14) 19

arXiv:physics/0004075v1 [physics.bio-ph] 28 Apr 2000Stochastic Resonance as Artefact of Oversimplification of a Neuron Model Hans E. Plesser∗and Theo Geisel Max-Planck-Institut f¨ ur Str¨ omungsforschung and Fakult ¨ at f¨ ur Physik, Universit¨ at G¨ ottingen Bunsenstraße 10, 37073 G¨ ottingen, Germany (September 23, 2013) The paradigm of stochastic resonance (SR)—the idea that signal detection and transmission may benefit from noise— has met with great interest in both physics and the neuro- sciences. But simplifications made to render models of neu- ronal activity mathematically tractable can be carried too far: the effect sought after may be introduced by the simplifying assumptions. In particular, several authors have posited t hat the stimulus driving a neuron is reset to a fixed phase ev- ery time the neuron fires a spike, so as to allow for analysis based on renewal theory. We argue that this assumption is biologically untenable and demonstrate that stochastic re so- nance occurs only because the firing pattern of the neuron matches the fixed reset phase optimally for a particular nois e amplitude. Stochastic resonance vanishes as soon as the res et phase is allowed to adapt to the noise amplitude in a biolog- ically plausible way. We conclude that stochastic resonanc e as reported earlier is caused by the presumed stimulus reset and is thus an artefact of simplifying assumptions. 87.19.La, 05.40.-a I. INTRODUCTION The improvement of signal transmission and detection through noise has been studied keenly over the past two decades under the paradigm of stochastic resonance; for recent reviews see Refs. [1,2]. This holds true for the neurosciences in particular, which have for a long time been puzzled by the seemingly irregular activity of the nervous system. A long series of experiments has now firmly established that sensory neurons of various modal- ities benefit from ambient noise [3–9]. Theoretical efforts to explain stochastic resonance in neuronal systems had to abstract rigorously from the bi- ological complexity of real neurons to facilitate mathe- matical treatment [10–14]. The leaky integrate-and-fire model neuron [15] is likely the most widely studied of these abstract neuron models, especially in investigation s of the neuronal code [16–21]. Several groups have inves- tigated stochastic resonance in this neuron model in the following setup [22–25]: The neuron is driven by white noise and a sinusoidal stimulus (input signal), which is reset to a fixed phase φ0every time the neuron fires a spike (i.e., emits a stereotyped voltage pulse). This re- set assumption turns the sequence of interspike intervals (ISI) into a renewal process [26], facilitating further ana l- ysis as reviewed in Sec. II B.Unfortunately, the presumed reset is highly implausi- ble as it implies, e.g., that an auditory neuron would re- set the sound waves arriving at the eardrum. The reset might be plausible if the sinusoidal stimulus was gener- ated within the neuron, as is the case in certain tempera- ture sensitive cells [27]. The firing patterns of these cells , though, may not be characterized as renewal processes, since the distribution of ISI lengths depends strongly on the phase at which the spike preceeding an interval is fired [28]. The reset assumption is thus difficult to rec- oncile with biological findings. We demonstrate in this paper that the stochastic res- onance reported in earlier work by one of us and others [23–25] is an artefact of the implausible reset assump- tion. It occurs because a fixed reset phase φ0is chosen independent of the input noise level and this phase is in some sense optimal for a particular amount of noise, as will be discussed in Sec. III. If, on the other hand, in an attempt to render the reset somewhat more realistic, the reset phase is adapted to the input noise amplitude σin a biologically plausible manner, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) becomes a monotonous function of the noise amplitude, i.e., stochastic resonance vanishes. This is expounded in Sec. IV, while consequences and related work are discussed in Sec. V. For a detailed account of the results presented here, see Ref. [28]. We would like to include a remark on terminology. Several authors refer to stimulation with reset as en- dogenous , and without reset as exogenous [24,25,29]. As remarked above, sinusoidal self-stimulation (i.e., endog e- nous stimulation) evokes firing patterns from thermore- ceptor neurons that cannot be reconciled with a stim- ulus reset, whence we suggest that these terms should be abandoned. We propose the terms constrained and unconstrained to refer to stimulation with and without reset, respectively. II. MODEL AND METHODS We review briefly the integrate-and-fire neuron model and the methods used in analyzing the response prop- erties of the neuron. For a detailed discussion, see Refs. [23,28]. 1A. Leaky integrate-and-fire neuron The leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model sketches the neuron as a capacitor with leak current, which is charged by an input current I(t) until the potential v(t) across the capacitor (membrane potential) reaches a threshold Θ. At that instant, an output spike is recorded and the potential reset to vr<Θ. The assumption that the stim- ulus is reset after each spike as well, implies that the membrane potential evolves according to ˙v(τ) =−v(τ) +µ+qcos(Ωτ+φ0) +σξ(τ), (1) in between any two spikes [15]; τis intra-interval time, i.e.,τruns from zero in every interval. µis the DC component of the stimulus, qits AC amplitude, Ω the nominal frequency, and φ0the fixed but arbitrary reset phase. All quantities are measured in their natural units, i.e., the membrane time constant τmand threshold Θ. vr= 0 is assumed throughout. The noise term in Eq. (1) subsumes both biochemical and network noise [30,31], and is taken to be Gaussian white noise [ /an}bracketle{tξ(t)ξ(t′)/an}bracketri}ht= δ(t−t′)]. A different realization of the noise is used for each interval. All intervals are thus statistically independent and the interval lengths form a sequence [ τ1,τ2,...,τ k,...] of independently, identically distributed random variables with density ρ(τ). The latter can be computed numer- ically or approximated in closed form [28,32,33]. The sequence of intervals thus forms a renewal process, which is fully characterized by the ISI density ρ(τ) [26]. The sequence of intervals corresponds to an output spike train f(t) =/summationtext kδ(t−tk) with spike times tk=/summationtext j≤kτj. This spike train is evoked by an effective stim- ulusconsisting of piecewise sinusoids of length τk, as shown in Fig. 1. In contrast, we call the pure sinusoid cos(Ωt+φ0) thenominal stimulus . Figure 1 demonstrates that the effective stimulus is approximately periodic only for a reset phase of φ0≈0, while it is an irregular se- quence of piecewise sinusoids for other choices of the reset phase. Since we are interested in the transmission of pe- riodic signals, we focus here on φ0= 0 in accordance with earlier work [23–25]. We further restrict ourselves to sub- threshold stimuli, i.e., supt→∞v(t) =µ+q/√ 1 + Ω2<1 forσ= 0 from integration of Eq. 1. Such stimuli, which elicit spikes only in the presence of noise, appear to be more relevant for the encoding of periodic signals than superthreshold stimuli [34]. B. Signal-to-noise ratio The performance of a signal processor is commonly measured in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio in studies on stochastic resonance. Since the spike train elicited from the neuron is a renewal process by virtue of the stimulus reset, its power spectral density (PSD) is given by [35]S(ω) =1 π/an}bracketle{tτ/an}bracketri}ht/parenleftbigg 1 + 2 ℜ˜ρ(ω) 1−˜ρ(ω)/parenrightbigg , ω> 0, (2) where ˜ρ(ω) =/integraldisplay∞ 0ρ(τ)eiωτdτ (3) is the Fourier transform of the ISI density and /an}bracketle{tτ/an}bracketri}htthe mean interspike interval length; note that ρ(τ) = 0 for τ <0 by definition. The input to the neuron is not purely sinusoidal due to the stimulus reset, and the maximum of the PSD will thus be shifted away from the stimulus frequency Ω, see Fig. 2(a). We thus define the signal as the maximum of the PSD in a window around Ω [23,24] ˆS=S(ˆΩ) = max {S(ω)|0.9Ω<ω< 1.1Ω} (4) and refer to the location ˆΩ of the maximum as peak fre- quency . The signal ˆSis undefined if S(ω) has no absolute maximum within the window as, e.g., in Fig. 2(b). The white power spectrum of a Poissonian spike train of equal intensity,SP= (π/an}bracketle{tτ/an}bracketri}ht)−1, is used as reference noise level [36], so that the signal-to-noise ratio becomes RSN=ˆS Sp. (5) III. FIXED RESET PHASE For fixed reset phase, φ0= 0, the model neuron shows typical stochastic resonance behavior, i.e., a maximum of the SNR at an intermediate albeit small noise amplitude σmax[solid line in Fig. 3(a)] [23]. The mechanism in- ducing stochastic resonance is indicated in Fig. 3(b): the maximal SNR is reached when the peak frequency ˆΩ and the reset frequency Ω res= 2π/Trescoincide, where Tres is the mode of the ISI density, i.e., the most probable in- terval between two stimulus resets. Coincidence of reset and peak frequencies thus indicates synchronization be- tween the stimulus reset and the correlations dominating the power spectrum of the output spike train. This effect may intuitively be explained as follows [23,25]. The neuron will preferentially fire around a par- ticular phase of the stimulus if noise is weak. As noise is increased, the threshold is more easily surmounted and spikes tend to occur at an earlier phase of the stimu- lus. For a particular noise amplitude, the preferred firing phase and the reset phase will match such that the neu- ron attains the optimal signal-to-noise ratio. Note that RSNis maximized as preferred firing and reset phases are close, but not identical to each other. 2IV. NOISE-ADAPTED RESET PHASE Let us pursue the concept of a preferred firing phase further in an attempt to justify the assumed stimulus re- set: If a neuron is driven by a sinusoidal stimulus which isnotreset after each spike, then its firing pattern will approach a stationary stochastic process [37,38]. In this stationary state, the neuron will preferentially fire at a particular phase φ∗. Usingφ0=φ∗as reset phase thus implies that the stimulus is reset to that phase at which spikes most likely occur, i.e., that the reset will not be noticeable on average. Bulsara et al. employed this ar- gument to justify the reset assumption [22]. But they further assumed implicitly that φ∗was independent of noise and might be chosen at will, namely φ∗=φ0= 0. These assumptions are not tenable, since the preferred phase depends on both stimulus and noise, see Fig. 3(d). We therefore suggest to use as reset phase, for each value of the noise amplitude, the preferred firing phase observed under stimulation without reset for that noise amplitude, φ0=φ0(σ) =φ∗(σ). (6) φ∗(σ) is defined as the mode of the firing phase density χ(ψ); the latter gives the probability for the neuron to fire at a particular phase. It may be obtained via Markov chain analysis of the neuronal firing pattern under stim- ulation without reset [37,38], and is commonly measured in neurophysiological experiments as [39,40]. The preferred phase φ∗(σ), and thus the reset phase φ0(σ), then varies with the input noise amplitude as shown in Fig. 3(d): For weak noise, the reset is ad- vanced to shorten interspike intervals, while for strong noise the reset is delayed to protract firing. As a conse- quence, the reset frequency Ω resbecomes identical to the nominal stimulus frequency Ω for all noise amplitudes, see Fig. 3(c). The signal-to-noise ratio, finally, increase s monotonously as the input noise vanishes, cf. Fig. 3(a). The same effect is found for other stimulus parameters as well, as shown in Fig. 4. Note that in the latter cases, the average membrane potential remains further below threshold than the for the example shown in Fig. 3, so that higher noise amplitudes are required to elicit a mea- surable response from the neuron. Thus stochastic resonance does not occur if the reset phaseφ0(σ) is properly adapted to the noise amplitude. Plainly speaking, the reset phase is, for each noise ampli- tude, optimally adjusted to the dynamics of the neuron, whence nothing can be gained by noise. V. DISCUSSION We have shown that the integrate-and-fire neuron model exhibits stochastic resonance induced by a fre- quency match if the stimulus driving the neuron is re- set to a fixed phase φ0after each spike fired. This re-sult is a more precise rendition of arguments given else- where [23,25]. Beyond this, we have clearly demonstrated that the observed effect is an artefact of the artificially fixed reset phase. If the reset is adjusted to the pre- ferred firing phase at each noise level, the SNR increases monotonously as noise vanishes. Our findings should not be restricted to the particular neuron model studied here. We expect that any neuron model which allows to match, by variation of the input noise amplitude, the preferred firing phase against a pre- defined reset phase will exhibit stochastic resonance as described in Sec. III. This effect will vanish if the re- set phase is allowed to adapt to the noise amplitude as discussed in Sec. IV. This indicates that excessive sim- plification for the sake of mathematical convenience may induce just those effects that are searched for. The reader might be puzzled in view of the results reported here that stochastic resonance occurs in the integrate-and-fire neuron if the stimulus is not reset [37]. The crucial difference is that studies of the latter ef- fect consider either explicitly [37] or implicitly [41] the power spectral density of a spike train of finite duration, while an infinite spike train is assumed here, cf. Sec. II B. Trains of very low intensity but precisely phase-locking to the stimulus, as evoked in the presence of very weak noise, thus yield a small finite-time signal-to-noise ratio , while their infinite-time SNR may be large. We expect that effects similar to the unconstrained case were also to be found for the constrained case, would the finite-time SNR be used. Given the biological implausibility of the stimulus reset, this topic does not warrant further study in our opinion, though. A criticism which might brought forth against this and related studies [37,23–25] is the use of the spectrum of a Poisson spike train as reference noise level in the defi- nition of the signal-to-noise ratio. This criticism is par- ticularly valid in view of recent results by Spiridon and Gerstner, who argue that noise power in spike trains is suppressed below the Poisson-level in the frequency range relevant to the neural code to facilitate signal processing in neuronal networks [42]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank G. T. Einevoll for critically reading the manuscript. [1] L. Gammaitoni, P. H¨ anggi, P. Jung, and F. Marchesoni, Rev Mod Phys 70, 223 (1998). [2] K. Wiesenfeld and F. Jaramillo, Chaos 8, 539 (1998). [3] A. Longtin, A. Bulsara, and F. Moss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 656 (1991). 3[4] J. K. Douglass, L. Wilkens, E. Pantazelou, and F. Moss, Nature 365, 337 (1993). [5] J. E. Levin and J. P. Miller, Nature 380, 165 (1996). [6] J. J. Collins, T. T. Imhoff, and P. Grigg, J. Neurophysiol. 76, 642 (1996). [7] P. Cordo et al., Nature 383, 769 (1996). [8] F. Jaramillo and K. Wiesenfeld, Nature Neurosci. 1, 384 (1998). [9] D. F. Russell and F. Moss, in CNS 1998 Abstracts , edited by J. Bower (Caltech, Pasadena, CA, 1998), p. 137. [10] T. Zhou, F. Moss, and P. Jung, Phys. Rev. A 42, 3161 (1990). [11] A. Bulsara et al., J. Theor. Biol. 152, 531 (1991). [12] Z. Gingl, L. B. Kiss, and F. Moss, Europhys. Lett. 29, 191 (1995). [13] K. Wiesenfeld et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2125 (1994). [14] J. J. Collins, C. C. Chow, A. C. Capela, and T. T. Imhoff, Phys. Rev. E 54, 5575 (1996). [15] H. C. Tuckwell, Stochastic Processes in the Neurosciences (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1989). [16] W. Gerstner, R. Kempter, J. L. van Hemmen, and H. Wagner, Nature 383, 76 (1996). [17] P. Marˇ s´ alek, C. Koch, and J. Maunsell, Proc. Natl. Aca d. Sci. USA 94, 735 (1997). [18] T. W. Troyer and K. D. Miller, Neural Comput. 9, 971 (1997). [19] G. Bugmann, C. Christodoulou, and J. G. Taylor, Neural Comput. 9, 985 (1997). [20] J. Feng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4505 (1997). [21] L. F. Abbott, J. A. Varela, K. Sen, and S. B. Nelson, Science 275, 220 (1997). [22] A. R. Bulsara et al., Phys. Rev. E 53, 3958 (1996). [23] H. E. Plesser and S. Tanaka, Phys. Lett. A 225, 228 (1997). [24] T. Shimokawa, K. Pakdaman, and S. Sato, Phys. Rev. E 59, 3427 (1999). [25] T. Shimokawa, K. Pakdaman, and S. Sato, Phys. Rev. E 60, R33 (1999). [26] D. R. Cox and H. D. Miller, The Theory of Stochastic Processes (Methuen&Co, London, 1965). [27] A. Longtin and K. Hinzer, Neural Comput. 8, 215 (1996). [28] H. E. Plesser, Ph.D. thesis, Georg-August-Universit¨ at, G¨ ottingen, 1999, webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/1999/plesser. [29] P. L´ ansk´ y, Phys. Rev. E 55, 2040 (1997). [30] A. Manwani and C. Koch, Neural Comput. 11, 1797 (1999). [31] Z. F. Mainen and T. J. Sejnowski, Science 268, 1503 (1995). [32] A. Buonocore, A. G. Nobile, and L. M. Ricciardi, Adv. Appl. Prob. 19, 784 (1987). [33] H. E. Plesser and W. Gerstner, Neural Comput. 12, 367 (2000). [34] R. Kempter, W. Gerstner, J. L. van Hemmen, and H. Wagner, Neural Comput. 10, 1987 (1998). [35] J. Franklin and W. Bair, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55, 1074 (1995). [36] M. Stemmler, Network 7, 687 (1996). [37] H. E. Plesser and T. Geisel, Phys. Rev. E 59, 7008 (1999). [38] T. Tateno, S. Doi, S. Sato, and L. M. Ricciardi, J. Stat.t02T4T6T8T10T12T14T−1.6−1.4−1.2−1−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.200.2 FIG. 1. Effective stimulus and corresponding spike trains for fixed reset phases φ0= 0 (top) and φ0=π/2 (bottom). The reset is hardly noticeable in the first case, while the ef- fective stimulus differs markedly from the nominal sinusoid for the latter. T= 2π/Ω is the nominal stimulus period; amplitudes are in arbitrary units. Phys.78, 917 (1995). [39] J. E. Rose, J. F. Brugge, D. J. Anderson, and J. E. Hind, J. Neurophysiol. 30, 769 (1967). [40] G. D. Smith, C. L. Cox, S. M. Sherman, and J. Rinzel, J. Neurophysiol. 83, 588 (2000). [41] T. Shimokawa, A. Rogel, K. Pakdaman, and S. Sato, Phys. Rev. E 59, 3461 (1999). [42] M. Spiridon and W. Gerstner, Network 10, 257 (1999). 40Ω2Ω3Ω4Ω5Ω6ΩS(ω) [dB](a) −40−35−30−25−20−15−10−5 0Ω2Ω3Ω4Ω5Ω6ΩS(ω) [dB] ω(b) −40−35−30−25−20−15−10−5 FIG. 2. Power spectral density of the spike trains shown in Fig. 1: (a) reset phase φ0= 0, and (b) φ0=π/2. The dashed horizontal line is the PSD SPof a Poisson train of equal in- tensity; vertical dotted lines mark the interval [0 .9Ω,1.1Ω], cf. Eq. (4). Note the lack of power in the vicinity of the nominal stimulus frequency Ω for reset phase φ0=π/2. Remaining stimulus parameters: µ= 0.9,q= 0.1, Ω = 0 .1π,σ= 0.008. RSN [dB](a) 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04101520 Ω(b) 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.040.280.3 0.32 Ω(c) 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.040.280.3 0.32 φ*(σ) −π/6−π/120π/24 σ(d) 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 FIG. 3. (a) Signal-to-noise ratio vs. input noise amplitude for fixed reset phase φ0= 0 (solid) and adaptive reset phase (dashed). Stochastic resonance only occurs for fixed phase. (b) Peak frequency ˆΩ (solid) and reset frequency Ω res(dashed) vs. noise amplitude for fixed reset phase. The dotted line marks the nominal stimulus frequency Ω = 0 .1π. (c) Same as (b), but for adaptive reset phase. (d) Preferred firing phase φ∗(σ) vs. noise amplitude. Other parameters: µ= 0.9, q= 0.1. 5RSN [dB](a) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.20 5 1015 RSN [dB](b) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.20 5 1015 −π/80π/8φ*(σ) σ(c) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 FIG. 4. Signal-to-noise ratio vs. input noise amplitude for stimulus frequency Ω = 0 .33πwith amplitudes (a) µ= 0.9, q= 0.1, and (b) µ= 0.8,q= 0.15; as in Fig. 3(a), the solid line is for fixed reset phase φ0= 0, and the dashed line for adapted phase. The preferred firing phase is shown in (c), with the solid line corresponding to (a) and the dashed line to (b). 6

arXiv:physics/0004076v1 [physics.atom-ph] 28 Apr 2000LETTER TO THE EDITOR Breit interaction in heavy atoms M G Kozlov †‡, S G Porsev †, and I I Tupitsyn § †Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, 188350, Gatchina, R ussia ‡E-mail:mgk@MF1309.spb.edu §St. Petersburg State University, Petrodvorets, Russia Submitted to: J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. Abstract. In this letter we discuss how to include Breit interaction in calculations of low-energy properties of heavy atoms in accurate and effec tive way. In order to illustrate our approach we give some results for Cs and Tl. Introduction. It is well known that in high accuracy atomic calculations on e may need to go beyond the Coulomb approximation for the two-electron interaction. The usual next step is to include the Breit interaction. A number of com monly used atomic packages, such as GRASP package [1], allows to do this routin ely. However, in many precision calculations one needs to account for different co rrections, which are not included in standard packages. Thus, it may be important to a nalyze the role of the Breit interaction on different stages of atomic calculation s. Below we present several simple observations which may help to include Breit interac tion in atomic calculations in an optimal way. Breit interaction between electrons 1 and 2 has the form VB≡V1 B+V2 B=−/vector α1·/vector α2 r12+1 2/braceleftBigg/vector α1·/vector α2 r12−(/vector r12·/vector α1)(/vector r12·/vector α2) r3 12/bracerightBigg , (1) where /vector αiare Dirac matrices and r12is the distance between the electrons. Equation (1) can be readily derived from the general expression for th e interaction via transverse photon in the Coulomb gauge by expanding it in powers of the ph oton frequency (see, for example, [2]). The operator V1 Bis called the magnetic (or Gaunt) term and the operator V2 Bis called the retardation term [3]. The magnetic term of the B reit operator is known to dominate in atomic calculations [4] and it is much simpler than the whole Breit operator. In present work we will neglect the retardation te rm and we will check the accuracy of this approximation by comparison to the resent c alculation by Derevianko [5] where the whole Breit operator was used. Note also, that s ome technical details of atomic calculations with retardation term were recently discussed in [6] (see also references therein).Letter to the Editor 2 Breit interactions in Dirac-Fock calculations. Here, we are interested in the calculations of the low-energy properties of heavy atoms. In such calcula tions all electrons are usually divided into two parts: the core electrons and the valence on es. Correspondingly, the interaction between electrons is reduced to the interactio n between the valence electrons and the interaction of the valence electrons with atomic cor e. The latter is described by the Hartree-Fock potential which includes direct and excha nge terms. In this case the following observations can be made. (i) Breit correction to the interaction between the valence electrons is of the order of α2(αis the fine structure constant) which is usually below the acc uracy of modern calculations of heavy atoms. (ii) Breit correction to the direct term of the Hartree-Fock potential turns to zero if the core includes only closed shells. Indeed, the vertex of the B reit interaction includes Dirac matrix /vector α, which is averaged to zero when summation over the closed she ll is done. (iii) Breit correction to the exchange interaction of the va lence electron with the core does not turn to zero and is of the order of R2, where Ris the overlap integral between the upper component of a valence orbital and the lowe r component of a core one. The largest integrals Rcorrespond to the innermost core orbitals, where small components are of the order of αZ. Thus, the dominant Breit correction is the one to the exchange core potential. (iv) The exchange interaction between valence electrons an d the innermost core electrons is significantly screened if the core relaxation i s allowed. Therefore, it is very important that Breit correction to the core potentia l is calculated self- consistently. In some cases the core relaxation can reduce t he final Breit correction to the valence energies by an order of magnitude (see the resu lts for Cs below). We are not going to give all technical details of the calculat ions here, but there are few points to be mentioned, at least briefly. Above we have argued that the only important contribution of the Breit interaction comes from the exchange with the core. The corresponding matrix element can be written in a form: /an}bracketle{tf|Vcore B|i/an}bracketri}ht=−/summationdisplay c∈core/an}bracketle{tf, c|VB|c, i/an}bracketri}ht =−δjf,jiδmf,mi/summationdisplay k/summationdisplay c∈core(2jc+ 1)/parenleftBigg jfjck −1 21 20/parenrightBigg2 Rk f,c,c,i, (2) where Rk f,c,c,iis the radial integral of the Breit interaction for multipol arityk. Interaction (2) can be included in calculation either pertu rbatively or self- consistently. In the former approach, the first order correc tion to the energy of the valence electron vis simply δεv=/an}bracketle{tv|Vcore B|v/an}bracketri}ht. In the self-consistent approach, the potential Vcore Bshould be included in the Dirac-Fock (DF) equations. These e quations will then give new set of orbitals and energies {˜ϕn,˜εn}andδεv= ˜εv−εv.Letter to the Editor 3 There are two things one has to keep in mind when solving the Di rac-Fock-Coulomb- Breit (DFCB) equations. The first is that Breit approximatio n is not completely relativistic and, thus, some caution may be necessary. For e xample, one can use projectors to the positive energy states. Technically that can be done with the help of the kinetic balance condition for the small components of the Dirac orbitals. Second, if we include Breit interaction in DF equations, the resulta nt corrections are not linear in Breit interaction. It is not difficult to eliminate the high er orders in Breit interaction with the help of a scaling parameter λ: one can substitute VBwithλVBand then calculate lim λ→0(δελ n/λ) and lim λ→0(δϕλ n/λ). In practice, however, the higher orders in Breit interaction are usually small enough to be neglected e ven for λ= 1 and there is no need in calculating these limits. Correlation effects. The usual accuracy of the DF approximation for binding energ ies of heavy atoms is of the order of 10%, while the Breit correcti ons are usually about 1% or less. Therefore, there is no point in calculating Breit corrections if one is not going to account for correlations in some way. It is usually c onvenient to distinguish between valence-valence and valence-core, or core-core co rrelations. The easiest and straightforward way to treat the former is to use the configur ation interaction (CI) method, while the latter are treated more efficiently within t he many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) in residual Coulomb interaction [7]. Below we discuss how to include Breit interaction in the CI and the MBPT calculations. If the CI is done in the frozen core approximation, then as we h ave said above, there is no need to include Breit corrections to the two-elec tron interaction, but it is necessary to include Breit corrections to the core potentia l. It is also important that core orbitals are found from the DFCB equations. If the MBPT in residual Coulomb interaction is used to accoun t for valence-core and core-core correlations, one may need to include Breit co rrections to corresponding diagrams. Generally speaking, there are two types of correc tions: “direct” and “indirect” ones. The former corresponds to the substitution of the resi dual Coulomb interaction with the Breit interaction in the MBPT expressions, and the l atter corresponds to the use of the DFCB equations as a zero order approximation. The d irect corrections are suppressed because the largest Breit radial integrals corr espond to the virtual excitations from the innermost core shells (see above) and these excitat ions correspond to the huge energy denominators. Therefore, one can neglect them w ithout significant loss of accuracy. The indirect corrections are much simpler: they a re accounted for simply by the use of the DFCB basis set instead of the DFC one. We see that dominant Breit corrections come from the solutio n of the DFCB equations for atomic orbitals. After that these orbitals ca n be used as a basis set for the CI and the MBPT calculations. On the CI stage one has to includ e Breit potential of the core explicitly when calculating one-electron integra ls for valence electrons, while in the MBPT calculations the direct Breit corrections can be ne glected altogether. That significantly simplifies calculations and allows to use stan dard CI and MBPT codesLetter to the Editor 4 without significant changes. Up to now we have focused on the calculations of atomic spectr a. If it is necessary to calculate some other atomic observables, the general cal culation scheme remains the same [8]. However, the MBPT part should be extended and so me new types of the MBPT corrections may appear. Also, it may be necessary to solve the random- phase approximation (RPA) equations for the operator of int erest. For example, if we calculate hyperfine structure (HFS) constants, we have to so lve the RPA equations for the operator of the hyperfine interaction. Again there are di rect and indirect Breit corrections to these equations. The latter are easily inclu ded in the same way as above. The former are important only for operators which are singul ar at the origin and, thus, have large matrix elements for the innermost core electrons . This is the case for the hyperfine interaction, while electric dipole operator give s the opposite example. Numerical results. Here we present some results for Cs and Tl. These two atoms are interesting because they are used in precision measurement s of parity nonconservation and high accuracy atomic calculations are necessary to comp are these measurements with Standard model predictions. The nuclear charge Zfor Tl is much larger than for Cs, so we can also see how Breit corrections grow with the nucl ear charge. In table 1 we present results of the DF calculations of bindin g energies for Cs in the Coulomb and Coulomb-Breit approximations. We also give res ults of the perturbative calculations of the Breit corrections for comparison. It is seen that the relaxation of the core significantly reduces Breit corrections to the valence energies. In table 2 the direct Breit corrections to the HFS constants a re given. As we have mentioned above, here one has to calculate Breit correc tion to the RPA vertices in addition to the corrections to the orbitals. In notations of Derevianko [5] the latter corresponds to the one-particle correction and the former c orresponds to the two-particle one. It is seen again that corrections obtained in the self-c onsistent approach are much smaller than the corresponding first order perturbative cor rections. That is caused by the screening of the Breit interaction by the core electrons which is neglected in the perturbative approach. Note, that screening effect is parti cularly important for the s-wave. The difference between our calculations of the first order Bre it corrections to the HFS constants and the results of the paper [5] should be due to the retardation term in (1). This difference is about 10% for the p-wave and 25% for the s-wave. That confirms that this term is significantly smaller than the magn etic one, but it can become important when Breit correction becomes larger or the accur acy of the calculations is improved. On the next stage we calculated correlation corrections fol lowing the method described in [7, 8]. These corrections include the self-ene rgy correction to the Hartree- Fock potential and the structural radiation corrections to the HFS operator. The latter contribution is small and we did not calculate Breit correct ions to it. Note that the indirect Breit corrections were calculated for the self-en ergy and the RPA contributions,Letter to the Editor 5 while the direct Breit corrections for the self-energy were neglected. The results of these calculations are given in table 3. It is seen that direct and i ndirect Breit corrections to the HFS constants are comparable. That means that it is impor tant to include Breit corrections when electronic correlations are considered. Calculations for Tl are much more complicated and require la rge CI for three valence electrons in addition to the MBPT (see [7, 8] for details). Th e Breit corrections appear to be much more important for Tl than for Cs. Here they are not n egligible already when the energy spectrum is considered (see table 4). In part icular, the fine structure splitting of the ground state is changed by 1%. Another differ ence from Cs is that the screening effect here is relatively weaker, but still signifi cant. For example, the first order Breit correction to the fine splitting of the ground sta te is −130 cm−1while the DFCB value is −81 cm−1. Comparison of the results of the CI calculations from table 4 with the final results, which include the MBPT corrections, demonstrates that Brei t contributions to the MBPT part constitute about 10% of the total Breit correction s to the transition frequencies. That is consistent with the overall role of the MBPT corrections in the final answer where they also contribute about 10%. Conclusions. We see that Breit interaction is important in precision calc ulations of heavy atoms. It is sufficient to include only (exchange) Breit potential of the core and neglect valence-valence Breit interaction. It is importan t to allow core relaxation to avoid overestimation of Breit corrections to energies and o rbitals of valence electrons. It is also important to calculate Breit corrections to the RP A part and to the MBPT part when one calculates the HFS constants or other similar o bservables. Acknowledgments. We are grateful to Dzuba, Labzowsky, Mosyagin, Titov, and Trzhaskovskaya for helpful discussions of the role of Breit interaction in heavy atoms. This work was partly supported by RFBR grants No 98-02-17663 and 98-02-17637. References [1] Parpia F A, Fisher C F, and Grant I P 1996 Comput. Phys. Commun. 94249 [2] Labzowsky L N 1996 Theory of Atom. Quantum Electrodynamics of Atomic Shells an d Emission Processes. (Moscow: Nauka) [3] Grant I P and Pyper N C 1976 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 9761 [4] Grant I P 1970 Advances in Physics 19747 [5] Derevianko A 2000 E-print: physics/0001046. [6] Reiher M and Hinze J 1999 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 325489 [7] Dzuba V A, Flambaum V V, and Kozlov M G 1995 Phys. Rev. A543948 [8] Dzuba V A, Kozlov M G, Porsev S G, and Flambaum V V 1998 JETP 87855 [9] Arimondo E, Inguscio, and Violino 1977 Rev. Mod. Phys. 4931 [10] Gilbert S L, Watts R N, and Wieman C E 1983 Phys. Rev. A27581 [11] Moore C E 1958 Atomic Energy Levels Natl. Bur. Stand.(US), Circ. No. 467 (Washington)Letter to the Editor 6 Table 1. Binding energies for Cs (au) in Dirac-Fock-Coulomb (DFC) an d Dirac-Fock- Coulomb-Breit (DFCB) approximations. The last raw gives th e one-particle first order Breit (FOB) correction in the perturbative approach. 6s1/2 6p1/2 6p3/2 7s1/2 7p1/2 7p3/2 DFC 0.127368 0.085616 0.083785 0.055187 0.042021 0.041368 DFCB 0.127358 0.085577 0.083768 0.055183 0.042008 0.04136 2 FOB 0.127217 0.085537 0.083726 0.055146 0.041993 0.041347 Table 2. The direct Breit corrections to the hyperfine structure cons tants in Cs(MHz). Corrections to the orbitals are calculated perturbatively (FOB) and self-consistently (DFCB). Direct corrections to the RPA are calculated as disc ussed in the text. DFC FOB DFCB RPA this work [5] this work [5] A6s1/21423.8 −10.7−8.14 −1.2 3.1 3.50 A6p1/2160.9 −1.9−1.58 −1.1 0.7 0.73 A6p3/2 23.9 −0.2 — −0.1 0.1 — A7s1/2391.2 −2.4−1.80 0 .0 0.9 0.96 A7p1/2 57.6 −0.6−0.54 −0.4 0.2 0.26 A7p3/2 8.6 0 .0 — 0 .0 0.0 — Table 3. Final results with the MBPT corrections for the HFS constant s for Cs (MHz) in Coulomb and Coulomb-Breit approximations. The defi nitions of the direct Breit (DB) and the indirect Breit (IB) corrections are given in the text. Experimental result are taken from [9, 10]. Coulomb DB IB Total Exper. A6s1/2 2312 1 .9 0 .9 2315 2298 A6p1/2 296 −0.4−0.4 295 292 A6p3/2 55.3 0 .0−0.1 55.2 50.3 A7s1/2 549 0 .9−0.9 549 546 A7p1/2 94.0 −0.2−0.1 93.6 94.3 A7p3/2 18.2 0 .0 0 .0 18.2 18.2Letter to the Editor 7 Table 4. Calculation of the spectrum of Tl in the Coulomb (C) and the Co ulomb- Breit (CB) approximations (in cm−1). The DF equations were solved in the VN−1 approximation. The CI was done for three valence electrons a nd final calculation included core-valence and core-core correlations within t he CI+MBPT method. DF CI Final Exper. C CB C CB C CB [11] 6p1/2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6p3/27186 7105 7066 6988 7878 7780 7793 7s1/222713 22597 24767 24660 26596 26474 26478 7p1/229546 29434 32210 32108 34109 33993 34160 7p3/230465 30346 33159 33048 35119 34994 35161 6d3/2 33970 33851 36175 36041 36118 6d5/2 34029 33909 36250 36115 36200

arXiv:physics/0004077v1 [physics.acc-ph] 28 Apr 2000Design and Simulation of a High Frequency High Power Rf Extraction Device Using a Dielectric-Loaded Waveguide1 Wei Gai,2Paul Schoessow High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory 9700 S Cass Ave Argonne IL 60439 Abstract We consider the use of a dielectric-loaded structure to extr act rf energy from a high current electron drive beam as a power source for a high energ y two-beam accelera- tor. This represents an alternative technique which we show to have some significant advantages over the use of the currently proposed corrugate d metal structures as power extraction devices. We discuss a particular design th at will extract high power rf (0.1 – 1 GW) from a high current drive beam. Rf generation an d transport in this class of devices have already been demonstrated at lower fre quencies. We discuss the design parameters for 15 and 30 GHz dielectric transfer s tructures and some possible experiments. Key words: wakefield, linear collider, rf structures PACS: 41.75.Lx,41.60.Bq,84.40.-x,29.17.+w 1 Introduction One trend in proposed future high energy linear collider des igns is the use of high accelerating gradients in room temperature high fre quency structures. This approach has the advantage that the average rf power for a given accel- erating gradient scales as 1/(frequency)2(1), while the breakdown field is em- pirically found to scale approximately as (frequency)1/3(2). At the same time, 1Work supported by US Department of Energy, High Energy Physi cs Division under contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38. 2email:wg@hep.anl.gov Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 27 July 2013/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr /BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr q b 2a 2b Dielectric Material Conductor q b CL cT b q b cT b l s Fig. 1. Dielectric loaded structure geometry. qbis the charge/bunch and cTbis the spacing of the bunches in the train. lsis the total length of the structure. the technology of conventional (klystron) rf sources is diffi cult to implement at frequencies higher than X-band (11.4 GHz) (1). Two- beam acc eleration (3) overcomes this difficulty by using a conventionally accelera ted high current drive beam as the rf source for the high energy accelerator. Two beam acceleration requires generation and propagation of a high cur- rent drive beam, and an efficient transfer structure to extrac t energy from the drive beam. We propose that a dielectric loaded waveguid e represents an optimal power extraction/transfer structure. Dielectric structures have been investigated experimentally at some length (4; 5). We summa rize some of the important features of this class of devices compared to conv entional copper rf structures: •Simplicity of construction. As shown in figure 1, the structu re is a simple ceramic tube which is inserted into a conducting copper slee ve. •Higher order mode damping. Parasitic HEM modes generated by off-axis injection errors can be easily suppressed (6) by interrupti ng the outer con- ductor with axial cuts and surrounding the sleeve with an abs orbing mate- rial. Note that this technique requires no modification to th e dielectric tube and only modest machining of the exterior conducting sleeve . •Recent advances in dielectric materials for microwave appl ications. Very low loss (tan δ ≃10−4) and high Q materials are commercially available (7). Other issues which may represent possible limitations on th e performance of dielectric structures are actively being investigated: •Efficient rf coupling. The wakefield generated by the drive bea m must be 2coupled out to a rectangular waveguide for transfer to the ac celerating struc- ture. This involves a mode conversion from TM 01in the dielectric tube to TE in the waveguide. Significant progress on efficient couplin g design has been made (8). •Charging. Beam halo or missteered beam impinging on the diel ectric tube can cause large electrostatic charge buildup, resulting in deflection of the beam or volume breakdown of the structure. We have observed b oth these effects in our experiments using polymer based materials suc h as rexolite or nylon but have not observed this in any of the glass or ceramic materials we have tested. Changes in microwave dielectric properties with time due to radiation damage have also not been seen in our experiment s. •Rf breakdown. The work in this area has been almost entirely c onfined to copper structures (2). We have currently generated rf surfa ce fields in ce- ramic structures >10 MV/m at 15 GHz (5) (limited by the available drive beam properties); no breakdown was observed at this level. W e expect that significantly higher fields can be developed at these frequen cies before break- down occurs but it is worth pointing out that these devices ar e interesting as power extraction structures even at 10 MeV/m scale gradie nts. 2 Rf Power Generation in a Dielectric Structure We follow the approach and notation of reference (9). Consid er a dielectric structure (figure 1) with inner radius a and outer radius b. An electron bunch train passing through the device will generate a steady stat e RF power P=l2 sω 4c(qb Tb)2(R′ Q)(1 βg−1)F2(σz) (1) where lsis the length of the structure, qbis the charge/bunch, cTbis the bunch separation, βgis the group velocity and F(σz) is a form factor proportional to the bunch spectrum (assumed Gaussian). R′/Qis the normalized ratio of the shunt impedance of the structure to its quality factor and en capsulates all the details of the structure geometry. To compute R′/Qfor a dielectric structure, we use R′/Q=4Ez0 qbω(2) where Ez0is the longitudinal decelerating wakefield in the device. In the limit of an infinitely long structure, the analytic expression for the wakefield is given 3in (10). This provides R′/Qvia equation 2, and we can proceed to compute and optimize the properties of our structures. Since the formalism of reference (10) does not allow for the e ffects of struc- ture boundaries, rf coupling etc., it only yields an approxi mate evaluation of the properties of these structures. We will also give more ac curate results of numerical calculations which include finite structure leng th and rf extraction effects. 3 Design of the Dielectric Power Extraction/Transfer Struc tures In this section we give a reference design for both 15 and 30 GH z structures. While the choice of device parameters are not identical to th e CLIC final design, this work allows the study of the physics and enginee ring aspects of dielectric- based power extraction devices. We have atte mpted to develop power levels of 100 MW with large coupling to the beam and usin g a common, commercially available dielectric. While 30 GHz is the design frequency of CLIC (9), there are a nu mber of advantages in developing a 15 GHz structure first. The lower f requency is compatible with both the microwave measurement equipment a nd the beam spectrum available at the AWA (5). Also, there is some questi on whether the use of 30 GHz rf does in fact provide significant performance i mprovement over 10 GHz range devices (11). The choice of dielectric is Cordierite which has a relativel y low permittivity (4.5) and low losses (Q=5000, tan δ = 0.0002). This material is commercially available (7), and we have verified its dielectric propertie s in bench tests. The choice of dielectric is not unique; for example, steatit e, another commer- cially available material, has a permittivity of 5.8 and los s tangent of 0.0001 and would perform equally well. Theoretically one could als o use a low cou- pling strength R′/Qusing a thin layer of high permittivity material to line the structure (12). The inner radius a must be chosen to transport all the drive be am. The choice of dielectric material and the device frequency then fix the o uter radius b. Using the methods outlined previously, we can calculate R′/Qand power generated in these devices assuming CLIC test facility beam parameters. Because of the simple geometry, the structures will be easy t o machine. Con- servatively assuming that the outer and inner radii of the st ructures can be machined to a tolerance of 25 µm, the worst case deviations from nominal 4frequency due to this tolerance are 3.4% for the 30 GHz device and 1.5% for the 15 GHz structure. 4 Numerical Calculations We also used the finite difference time domain program ARRAKIS (13) to calculate the power generated in these structures while tak ing into account the finite structure length, group velocity of the wakefield, etc . In order to simulate the effects of power extraction from the structure, an absorb ing boundary was placed at the downstream end of the dielectric tube in the com putational geometry. Figures 2a and 3a show the longitudinal wake potentials for t he 15 and 30 GHz devices for a single drive bunch and for a train of 1 nC bunc hes spaced by 10 cm. Buildup of fields to equilibrium occurs relatively q uickly– after four bunches (1.33 ns) for the 15 GHz device and three bunches (1.0 ns) for the 30 GHz structure due to its larger group velocity. The appare nt “damping” of the wakefield after each bunch is in fact due to the large gro up velocity of the fields and the finite length of the devices. The 15 GHz wake s hows some additional structure due to the excitation of the TM 02mode at 42.8 GHz and the TM 03at 73.4 GHz. The higher frequency modes result in some ineffici ency but in general will not be transported out of the structure wh en the coupling is optimized for the fundamental frequency. The bunch train wakes shown in figures 2b and 3b reflect finite st ructure length and group velocity effects by their not purely sinusoi dal character. In order to compute the useful power generated at the fundament al, we filter the data by performing an FFT and zeroing all Fourier compone nts outside a fixed window in ∆ f/f0. The inverse FFT then yields the amplitude W of the wake within that bandwidth, and the power generated is P=W(MeV/m/nC )×qb(nC)×I(=qb/Tb)(A)×(ls(m)).(3) Table 1 summarizes the parameters of these structures. The p ower generated is large, on the order of 100 MW for a 30 cm test structure with ∆ f/f0= 4% and scaling quadratically with the length of the device. In t he 30 GHz case the dielectric device performance is comparable to the CLIC designs (9) while being easier to manufacture and to incorporate parasitic mo de damping. 50 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90−2−1012 z (cm)Wz (MeV/m/nC) (b)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.200.20.40.6 (a) z (cm)Wz (MeV/m/nC) Fig. 2. Numerical calculation of the longitudinal wake in th e 15 GHz dielectric structure of Table 1. (a) Single bunch. (b) Bunch train. The b unch separation is approximately 10 cm (333 ps, 5 λrf) and the beam intensity is normalized to 1 nC/bunch. 5 Summary We have presented designs for dielectric power extraction s tructures for two- beam accelerators which are able to produce power levels com petitive with conventional copper structures while at the same time posse ssing the advan- tages of ease of construction and straightforward implemen tation of parasitic mode damping. We plan to build and test a 15 GHz device at our la boratory and if successful build a 30 GHz device for the CLIC test facil ity. References [1] B. Danly, in Advanced Accelerator Concepts , Fontana, WI 1994, edited by P. Schoessow, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 335 (Americ an Insti- tute of Physics, Woodbury NY 1994) [2] G. Loew, J. Wang, SLAC-PUB-7684, (October 1997) [3] A. Sessler, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 91, edited by P. Channell (1982) W. Schnell, CERN-LEP-RF/86-06 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90−3−2−10123 (b) z (cm)Wz (MeV/m/nC)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90−1−0.500.51 (a) z (cm)Wz (MeV/m/nC) Fig. 3. Numerical calculation of the longitudinal wake in th e 30 GHz dielectric structure (Table 1). (a) Single bunch. (b) Bunch train. The b unch separation is approximately 10 cm (10 λrf). The beam intensity is normalized to 1 nC/bunch. [4] W. Gai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 61, 2756 (1988) [5] P. Schoessow et al., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 663 (1998) [6] E. Chojnacki et al., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 6257 (1991) [7] Trans-Tech Inc., Catalog No. 5520, Adamstown, MD 21710 [8] P. Zou et al., to be published in Review of Scientific Instr uments [9] H. Braun et al., CLIC Note 364 (unpublished) [10] M. Rosing, W. Gai, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1829 (1990) [11] R. Ruth, private communication [12] W. Gai, WF-186 (unpublished). Available as web resourc e http://www.hep.anl.gov/awa/awa/docs/wf186.pdf. [13] P. Schoessow, W. Gai, in Quantum Aspects of Beam Physics , P. Chen ed., World Scientific 1999, p. 289 7Table 1 Parameters of the 15 and 30 GHz structures and their predicte d performance. The beam parameters assumed correspond to those available at th e CLIC test facility. Frequency f0(GHz) 15 30 Charge per bunch qb(nC) 10 10 Bunch length σz(mm) 1 1 Bunch spacing Tb(ps) 333 333 Structure length ls(cm) 30 30 Inner radius a(mm) 5 4 Outer radius b(mm) 7.38 5 Dielectric constant ǫ 4.5 4.5 Loss tangent tan δ 0.0002 0.0002 Group velocity βg 0.28 0.41 Attenuation of the structure (dB) 0.35 0.53 Power generated (∆ f/f0=.04) (MW) 94 178 Peak deceleration field W(MV/m) 23.6 24.3 Normalized shunt impedance R′/Q(MΩ) 0.1002 0.0516 8

arXiv:physics/0005002v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 1 May 2000MAGNETIC FRACTAL DIMENSIONALITY OF THE DIELECTRIC BREAKDOWN UNDER STRONG MAGNETIC FIELDS Y. Ben-Ezra1,2,3, Yurij V. Pershin4,2, I.D.Vagner1,2and P.Wyder2 1P.E.R.I.-Physics and Engineering Research Institute at Ru ppin, Emek Hefer, 40250 Israel. 2Grenoble High Magnetic Fields Laboratory Max-Planck-Institute f¨ ur Festkorperforschung and CNRS, 166X, F-38042, Cedex 9, France. 3School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. 4B.I.Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engin eering, 47 Lenin Avenue 310164 Kharkov, Ukraine. The formation of breakdown pattern on an insulating surface under the influence of a transverse magnetic field is theoretically investigated. We have generalized th e Dielectric Breakdown Model (DBM) for the case of external magnetic field. Concept of the Magnetic Fractal D imensionality (MFD) is introduced and its universality is demonstrated. It is shown that MFD saturate s with magnetic fields. The magnetic field dependence of the streamer curvature is obtained. It is conj ectured that nonlinear current interaction is responsible for the experimentally observed ’spider-legs ’ like streamer patterns. PACS numbers: 52.20.Dq, 52.80.Mg 1Fractal properties are common to the dielectric breakdown p henomena [1] which range from an atmo- spheric lightning [2],[4], [3] to electric treeing in polym ers [5] and are of scientific and technical importance [6],[7]. Although the actual physical processes can be quit e different in these phenomena, the global prop- erties of the resulting discharge patterns are very similar . Filamentary gas discharges on insulating surface exhibit remarkable similarities to breakdown phenomena in long gaps [8], e.g., to atmospheric lightning , and thus offer the possibility to perform well-defined model expe riments in laboratory. The application of sophis- ticated diagnostic tools, such as streak cameras, high-spe ed oscilloscopes, and time-resolved spectroscopy [9], in surface discharge experiments has improved the basic und erstanding of how a highly conducting phase, the filamentary ”leader” channel, advances into a nonconduc ting medium as the surrounding gas. The surface discharge in compressed SF6gas have been studied in detail by Niemeyer and Pinnekamp[10 ]. The parameters were controlled in such a way that the experim ent produces, to a good approximation, an equipotential channel system growing in a plane with a radia l electrode from a central point. The experiment shows that the dielectric breakdown pattern has a fractal st ructure. The stochastic model containing the essential features of t he fractal properties of the dielectric break- down was introduced by Niemeyer, Pietroniero, and Wiesmann (NPW) [11],[1]. The introduced stochastic model made it possible to simulate the growth of a fractal str ucture which resembles a Lichtenberg figure [2]. The basic assumption of the dielectric breakdown model (DBM ) was that the growth probability depends on the local field. This model naturally leads to fractal struct ures. In [11] the Haussdorf dimension and other fractal properties of the structure are determined and thei r close relations to the other fractal structures e.g., DLA (the diffusion limited aggregation) [12], is shown . The DBM method was generalized by Wiesmann and Zeller [13] in two ways. Firstly they introduced a critical field for growth Fc. The growth probability was assumed to be proportional to th e local field Floc ifFloc> Fcand zero if Floc< Fc.Secondly they have introduced an internal field in the struct ureFs. The potential in the structure was no longer equal to the potenti alV0of the connecting electrode but equal to V0+Fs·s, where sis the length of the path along the structure which connects t he point to the electrode. In the recent experiment [3] a transverse high magnetic field was applied during the discharge evolution and thus any spatial restriction of the surface di scharge was avoided in order to use a locally sensitive probe. When a rectangular high-voltage pulse of about 500 nslength, 20 kVamplitude, and less than 10 ns risetime is applied to a point-to- plane electrode system, t he electrodes being separated by a thin dielectric film ( thickness ≈100µm) , a discharge propagates in the gas just above the surface of the film. The discharge pattern was recorded directly with high resolution by using a photographic film as dielectric plate. The experiment shows the spatial evolution of a negative sur face discharge in a nitrogen atmosphere as a function of the magnetic field ( Fig.2 of Ref. [3]). At B= 0 a very bright starlike pattern develops. At moderate magnetic field (up to 7 T), the leader channels are bent and appear to have a circular s hape outside the central electrode region. The radius of curvature is of the order of 1 cmat 7T. The direction of the bending corresponds to the movement of electrons in crossed electric and magnetic field s. With the increase of the magnetic field the radius of curvature decreases, the channels approach ea ch other and branching sets in. At the highest applied magnetic field of 12 T, circular-shaped current filaments are only found in the out most regions of the discharge pattern where they can develop undistributed by t he fields of neighboring leader channels. One can summarize the experimental results as follows: (1) The observed bending effect cannot be related to the movem ent of a single charged particles in crossed electric and magnetic fields, which should result in the curv atures of the order of magnitude of 15 µmat 1T for the electrons, i.e., the Larmor radius rc=vc/ωcof the cyclotron orbit of an electron withe enough kinetic energy to ionize gas molecules. It has be assumed that the mac roscopic value of the radius of curvature results from the drift movement of the Larmor centers of the gyrating electrons. The average radius of curvature follows a power law, R∝B−α. The exponent αdepends on the nature of gas. (2) The circular shape of the current filaments is not expecte d to occur for our point-to-plane electrode geometry. (3) The complexity of the discharge pattern can be controlle d by the magnetic field strength. It appears 2that an increase in complexity is induced on the scale of the b ending observed, and not on the microscopic scale of the cyclotron radius. In what follows we modify the model introduced by Wiesmann an d Zeller [13] for the case of external magnetic field. Let us consider a two-dimensional square lattice in which a c entral point represents one of the electrodes while the other electrode is modeled as a circle at large dist ance, which represents the geometry of the experiment. The discharge starts at the central electrode a nd grows by one lattice bond per growth step. A bond connects a lattice point with one of eight adjacent latt ice points as it is described in Fig.1. Once a given point is connected to the discharge structure by a bond, it be comes part of the structure. The potential of the central electrode is 0, the potential of a point in the str ucture is Vi,k=Vl,m+VR∗l, where Vl,mis the potential of a points from which growth go on, VRis an internal field in the structure and lis 1 for bonds parallel to the grid and is√ 2 for diagonal bonds. The growth is computed as follows: First the Laplace equatio n is solved with the boundary conditions determined by the electrodes and the discharge structure. T hen the local field Flocbetween a point which is already a part of the structure ( i, k) and a new adjacent point ( i′, k′) is calculated: Floc(i, k, i′, k′) =ϕ i′,k′−Vi,k l(1) where ϕ i′,k′is the solution of Laplace equation. The breakdown can occur only if the local field is greater that the critical field of growth FC. The probability that a new bond will form between a point whi ch is already a part of the structure and a new adjacent point p(i, k→i′, k′) is calculated as a function of the local field Flocbetween the two points: p(i, k→i′, k′) =  0 , F loc(i, k, i′, k′)< FC Fη loc/summationtextFη loc, F loc(i, k, i′, k′)≥FC(2) where a power-low dependence with exponent ηis assumed to describe adequately the relation between the local field and the probability. The sum in the denominator re fers to all possible growth processes. A new bond is chosen randomly with probability distribution (2) a nd added to the discharge pattern. With this new discharge pattern one starts again. More detailed descr iption of this model is done in [13] . Let us take into account the magnetic field. The magnetic field changes the probability distribution (2). A moving particle in the magnetic field experiences the Lorent z force FL∼− →V×− →Hwhich acts perpendicularly to its velocity. Consider each step of growth like a superpos ition of two processes. The first step is choosing a new bond using the probability distribution (2), and the se cond step is taking into account the probability of deviation of the growth due to the magnetic field, pH. If after first step of growth, for example, the bond from the do t 0 to the dot 4 was chousen (Fig.1), the growth will occurs to the dot 3 with the probability pHand to the dot 4 with the probability 1 −pH. The new probability of growth can be written as /tildewidep(i, k→i′, k′) =p(i, k→i′, k′)(1−pH(i, k, i′, k′)) +p(i, k→i′′, k′′)pH(i, k, i′′, k′′)/summationtext(p(i, k→i′, k′)(1−pH(i, k, i′, k′)) +p(i, k→i′′, k′′)pH(i, k, i′′, k′′))(3) where the point ( i′′, k′′) is the neighboring point with respect to the point ( i′, k′) in the clockwise direction with respect to the point ( i, k) and the sum in the denominator refers to all possible growth processes. The probability 3 was used in computer simulations in place of th e probability 2 with the same algorithm. Let us turn to the probability pHof deviation of the growth due to the magnetic field. In our mod el, during the process of growth, two constant forces act on char ge cariers, FLandFH(Fig.1). When the resulting force is near the dot 3, pH−→1; when the resulting force is near the dot 4, pH−→0. It is clear 3that the probability pHis proportional toFL Floc. IfFloc(i, k, i′, k′)< FCthen the growth does not occur and pHshould be zero. IfFL Floc>1 then we let pH= 1. The Lorentz force FLis proportional to the velocity of charge carrier. In our model we can take into account only a lo cal velocity, which arrises in the first step of growth process due to the acceleration in the local field Floc. So, the Lorentz force should be proportional to/radicalbig lFloc(i, k, i′, k′). Based on these considerations, we choose the probability of deviation of the growth due to the magnetic field,pH,in the following form: pH(i, k, i′, k′) =  0 , F loc(i, k, i′, k′)< FC FL(i,k,i′,k′) Floc(i,k,i′,k′),FL(i,k,i′,k′) Floc(i,k,i′,k′)≤1, Floc(i, k, i′, k′)≥FC 1 ,FL(i,k,i′,k′) Floc(i,k,i′,k′)>1, Floc(i, k, i′, k′)≥FC(4) where FL(i, k, i′, k′) =/radicalbig lFloc(i, k, i′, k′)HandHis the value of the magnetic field. In our computer simulations we consider a 500 ×500 lattice. The solutions of the Laplace equation were obtained by the iteration method [11]. Before starting of ea ch realization of growth we performed 20000 iterations and after each step of growth the number of iterat ions was 40. This procedure gives a good convergence. The number of particles in clusters was 9000. The fractal dimension was calculated by the method describe d in [11]. For every realization we plotted the log N(R) versus log Rwhere N(R) is the number of particles belonging to the structure and be ing within a circle of radius R. The fractal dimension is obtained by fitting a straight line to the data scaling region. For every set of the same parameters of the model ( H,FC,VR,η) we made about 100 realizations. Thus the statistical fluctuations were reduced. Let us discuss the results of these calculations. We start our simulations with the case of the zero magnetic fie ld and the zero values of the parameters FcandVRin order to compare our results with the results of the differe nt authors. In the Table.1 we present the dependence of the Hausdorff dimension Don the exponent parameter η. ηD(our results) D(according to [11]) D(according to [13]) 0.5 1.89±0.02 1.89±0.01 1.92 1 1.73±0.02 1.75±0.02 1.70 2 1.6±0.03 ∼1.6 1.43 Table 1. Dependence of the Hausdorff dimension Don the exponent ηused in the relation between probability and local field (Eq.2). Our results are in a good agreement with the results, obtaine d earlier. The example of the computer-generated discharge pattern (L ichtenberg figure [2]) corresponding to the following set of parameters: H= 0, η= 1, Fc= 0 and VR= 0 is shown in the Fig.2. In the Fig.3 we show the computer-generated discharge pattern in the presence o f the external magnetic field. The white lines in the figures 1 and 2 correspond to the leader channels. Unlik e the pattern, presented in the Fig.2, the leader channels in the magnetic field are distorted and appea re to have a circular shape outside the central electrode region. The direction of the bending corresponds to the movement of electrons in crossed electric and magnetic field. At the lower left corner of the Fig.3 we plo tted the cyclotron orbit of an electron. One can note that the Larmor radius of an electron is about two ord ers of magnitude smaller then the radius of curvature of the leader channel. The saturation of the fractal dimensionality, with growing magnetic fields, at the value of D= 1.67 , which is one of the main results of this paper, is presented in Fig. 4. The plot starts from the value of D= 1.65 , in the absence of magnetic field, which is smaller than the fractal dimensionality reported in [11]. 4Such difference results from the fact that in [11] the critica l field value for the breakdown was not taken into account. We have improved their calculations by introducin g the minimal value of the electric field for the breakdown between two successive points. In this case the br eakdown pattern is more directionally selected, and a lower fractal dimensionality results. With the increa se of the external magnetic field, the MFD growth and finally saturates at an universal for high magnetic fields values of 1 .67±0.01.The growth of MFD with the magnetic field could be expected, since the curved trajec tories fill up the space more densely than the straight ones. The existence of an universal limit, hovewer , is far from being obvious. Following the directed percolation models, one could think that the saturation of M FD will occur at D= 2 . Fig 4. shows clearly that in this system the MFD saturates due to the physics of cur rent carrying streamers. An unexplained feature in the experiments of [3] is the ’spid er-legs’ form of the breakdown pattern in the absence of the external magnetic field. We outline here that t he streamer currents are rather strong, 10 ÷100 A, and their influence on the streamer pattern can be very impor tant. To describe this phenomenon we have taken into account the magnetic interaction between curren t carrying streamers, in the framework of the modified active walker model (MAWM) which is described in wha t follows. The results of our calculations, presented in Fig. 5, show that our model correctly describes the experimentally observed ’spider-legs’ effect. Active walker models have been used to describe different pat tern formation problems [14, 15]. In these models the walkers moovement is subject to the influences of t he environment and vice versa. We describe the leader channel propagation in the magnetic field using th e active walker model. The Lorentz force acting on the fast-moving electrons is particularly effective in th e high-field regions in the leader tips, where the channel formation takes place. Let us consider again a two-dimensional square lattice in wh ich a central point represents one of the electrodes while the other electrode is modeled as a circle a t large distance. The discharge starts at the central electrode, so initially several walkers are set in t he vicinity of it. The walkers move in a potential which is the solution of the Laplace equation with the bounda ry conditions determined by electrodes and discharge structure. During a step of growth each walker mov es. The solution of Laplace equation is found by iteration method [11] after each step of growth. When a walker moves to a point, this point starts belonging to the breakdown structure. The potential of the central electrode is 0, the potential of a point in the s tructure is Vi,k=Vl,m+VR∗l, where Vl,mis the potential of a points from which growth go on, VRis an internal field in the structure and lis 1 for bonds parallel to the grid and is√ 2 for diagonal bonds. In the absence of the magnetic field, the probability of a walker step is a function of the local field Floc[14]. The breakdown occurs only if the local field is greater then the critical field of growth FC. The magnetic field is taken into account by the following way. We add to the local field in the direction perpendicular to the previous move of the walker the Lorentz force which is proportional to the magnetic field. The magnetic field acting on the iwalker is Hi=H0+Hi I, where H0is external magnetic field and Hi Iis the field created by currents of the breakdown structure. W e calculate Hi Iby means of the Biot-Savart law: Hi I=/summationdisplay k/negationslash=i,lI r3d− →sk,l×− →r (5) where Iis the current in a channel, d− →sk,lislelement of the kchannel and− →ris the vector pointed from the position of d− →sk,lto the position of the iwalker. The main results of this part of studies are presented in Fig. 5. To summarize, we have generalized and modified the existing d ielectric breakdown models to explain the experimental observations of the propagation of a streamer near an insulating surface under the influence of a transverse magnetic field. We have introduced the concep t of the Magnetic Fractal Dimensionality (MFD) and have obtained its saturation with growing magneti c fields. The Universal Magnetic Fractal Dimensionality (UMFD) equals 1 .670 which is superior to 1 .65,the one in the absence of a magnetic field. Inclusion of the magnetic interaction between the current- carrying streamers results in the ’spider-legs’ like streamer patterns at lower fields, which corresponds to the e xperimental observations. 5We acknowledge helpfull discussions with T.Maniv, and A.Zh uravlev. We acknowledge the assistance of A.Kaplunovsky in the initial stage of numerical simulation s. 6References [1] A. Erzan, L. Pietronero, A. Vespignani, Reviews of Moder n Physics, Vol. 67, No.3, July 1995. [2] G.C. Lichtenberg, Novi Commentarii Societatis Regiae S cientiarium Gottingae 8, 168 (1877). [3] P. Uhlig, J.C. Maan and P. Wyder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1968 (1989). [4]Engineering Dielectrics , Vols I-VI (American Society for Testing and Materails, Phi ladelphia 1983), Special Technical Publication No. LC. No82-70637. [5] R.A. Fava, in Treatise on Material Science and Technolog y, edited by J.M. Schutz (Academic, New York 1977), Vol. 10, Pt. B., p.677. [6] H.R. Zeller and W.R. Schneider, J.Appl. Phys. 56,455 (1984). [7] Tamas Vicsek, Fractal Growth Phenomena (World Scientific Publishing, 1989). [8] I. Gallimberti, J.Phys. (Paris), Colloq. 40, C7-197 (1979). [9] S. Larigadie, J. Apll. Phys. 61, 90 (1987). [10] L. Niemeyer and F.Pinnekamp, in Gaseous Dielectrics III , edited by G. Christophorou (Pergamon, New York, 1982). [11] L. Niemeyer, L. Pietronero and H.J. Wiesmann, Phys. Rev . Lett. 52, 1033 (1984). [12] A. Witten and L.M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981). [13] H.J. Wiesmann and H.R. Zeller, J. Appl. Phys., 60, No.5, 1770 (1986). [14] Chia-Rong Sheu, Ching-Yen Cheng, and Ru-Pin Pan, Phys. Rev. E, 59,1540 (1999). [15] D. Helbing, F. Schweitzer, J. Keltsch and P. Molnar, Phy s. Rev. E 56, 2527 (1997). 7Figure Captions Fig.1. Bonds connecting a lattice point with one of eight adjacent l attice points in a two-dimensional square lattice. The geometry of the experiment is represented by a c entral electrode at some point while the other electrode is a circle at large distance. The discharge start s at the central electrode and grows by one lattice bond per growth step. Fig.2. Computer-generated discharge pattern (Lichtenberg figure ) corresponding to the following set of param- eters: H= 0, η= 1, Fc= 0 and VR= 0 as explained in the text.The white lines correspond to the leader channels. Fig.2. Computer-generated discharge pattern in the presence of th e external magnetic field. The leader channels in the magnetic field are distorted and appeare to have a circu lar shape outside the central electrode region, due to the action of the magnetic field. Fig.4. The saturation of the fractal dimensionality, with growing magnetic fields, at the value of D= 1.67 . Fig.5. The ’spider-legs’ form of the breakdown pattern folowing fr om the magnetic interaction between the streamer currents: a) current-current interactions are no t took into account, H= 0; b)current-current interactions are took into account, H= 0; c) H∝negationslash= 0. 8This figure "fig1.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005002v1This figure "fig2.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005002v1This figure "fig3.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005002v1This figure "fig4.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005002v1This figure "fig5.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005002v1

arXiv:physics/0005003v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 3 May 2000 %%%

arXiv:physics/0005004v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 3 May 2000An inertial range length scale in structure functions. Robert M. Kerr Geophysical Turbulence Program National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO 80307-3000, USA Maurice Meneguzzi ASCI-CNRS, Universite de Paris Sud, 91405 ORSAY Cedex and Service d’Astrophysique, Centre d’Etudes de Saclay, France Toshiyuki Gotoh Department of Systems Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Tec hnology Showa-ku, Gokiso-cho, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan February 2, 2008 Abstract It is shown using experimental and numerical data that withi n the traditional inertial subrange defined by where the third ord er structure function is linear that the higher order structure function scaling expo- nents for longitudinal and transverse structure functions converge only over larger scales, r > r S, where rShas scaling intermediate between η andλas a function of Rλ. Below these scales, scaling exponents can- not be determined for any of the structure functions without resorting to procedures such as extended self-similarity (ESS). With ESS, differ- ent longitudinal and transverse higher order exponents are obtained that are consistent with earlier results. The relationship of th ese statistics to derivative and pressure statistics, to turbulent structur es and to length scales is discussed. 1 Introduction An important tool in understanding intermittency in turbul ence has been the exponents ζpof power laws for the velocity structure functions. The long itudinal 1structure functions are SL p(r) =<(u(x+r)−u(x))p>∼rζL p (1) where− →uand− →rare in the same direction. Their measurement requires only a single hot wire probe that can, through the Taylor frozen tur bulence assumption, determine one velocity component uas a function of the parallel spatial direction rand thus find the SL pat high Reynolds numbers. Using crossed-wire probes, one can also obtain reliable, high Reynolds number measurem ents of transverse structure functions ST p(r), where− →uand− →rare orthogonal, and their exponents ζT p. There are also mixed structure functions containing both l ongitudinal and transverse components. The relationship between the ζpand intermittency [1] is in deviations of the the exponents ζpfrom their Gaussian or classical values of ζp=p/3, where ζ2≈2/3 and ζ3= 1 are expected for an energy cascade. In the presence of intermittency, ζp< p/3 for p >3 is expected. Furthermore, it has generally been believed that all of the ζL,T pof a given order pshould be the same in the infinite Reynolds number limit. This is closely related to th e refined similarity hypothesis (RSH) which assumes that the only information th at can affect the statistics on a given scale ris the fluctuations in the energy cascade ǫrthrough that scale. Details about either the large scale forcing or t he dissipative struc- tures should be irrelevant in this picture. Measurements [2 ] have confirmed RSH as it relates dissipation to longitudinal statistics. More recently, moderate Reynolds numbers simulations and e xperiments [3, 4] have found, with the help of the extended self-similar ity hypothesis [5], thatζT p< ζL pforp >3. This has been now been confirmed over all Reynolds numbers simulated [6] or observed [7] to date. If longitudin al and transverse statistics are different, then the statistics of strain, tha t is dissipation ǫr, and the statistics of of vorticity, call it Ω rfor its relationship to the enstrophy, should be different. Since ζT p< ζL p, it implies that vorticity is more intermittent than strain. This possibility has been suggested by recent numer ical results [6] that show that dissipation and enstrophy statistics scale as RSH predicts, but with separate distributions. This result implies that when the n onlinear coupling is written as a convolution in Fourier space that not only the ve locity magnitude, but also the velocity phase, what makes the transfer of Ω rdifferent than ǫr, is important. Related to this, if the dissipation-dissipatio n correlation and its Ω r counterpart go as < ǫxǫx+r>∼rµand<ΩxΩx+r>∼rµΩ(2) then different Ω rstatistics implies that µΩ/ne}ationslash=µ. Experimentally, µ≈0.25 [21] has been confirmed by the latest measurements and simula tions [22, 10, 8], although lower Reynolds number measurements tend to give µ= 0.5.µΩ/ne}ationslash=µ is found in one numerical result [8]. 2It will be shown here that different longitudinal and transve rse statistics suggest the existence of a crossover length scale within the inertial subrange. That is a length scale distinct from the large length scale Lor a multiple of the dissipation or Kolmogorov scale η, and maybe the order of the intermediate Taylor microscale λ, where the Taylor microscale Reynolds number and λare defined as Rλ=Uλ νwhere λ=U <(du/dx )2. >1/2(3) Rλis the definition of the Reynolds number that appears to give u niform scaling in a variety of different flows and is related to the large scale Reynolds number byRλ∼(R=UL/ν )1/2. The Kolmogorov scale is related to λby η= (ν/ǫ)1/4∼λR−1/2 λ(4) where νis viscosity and ǫis the dissipation rate. In order to discern if there is some crossover length scale fo r some struc- ture function within the inertial subrange and determine if there are indeed different longitudinal and transverse exponents, a long ine rtial subrange and clean data are needed. Numerical simulations do not have thi s range, but if run sufficiently long give clean data and more flexibility. Observ ations can provide more dynamic range, but with more limited types of data. This paper will use both experimental and numerical data to try to present a more complete pic- ture than either measurements or simulations alone of what e vidence there is for different longitudinal and transverse statistics and it s implications. Exper- imental data will be used to indicate the high Reynolds numbe r trends, then analysis from forced numerical turbulence in a box at Rλ= 262 on a 5123mesh andRλ= 390 on a 10243mesh will be presented, with most of the discussion related to the Rλ= 262 calculation. It will be shown that if the same inertial range scaling analysis defined by the experiments is applied to the simulations, then the trends in the lower Reynolds number simulations are consistent with the experiments and clearly demonstrate a trend where simpl e scaling breaks down at many multiples of the Kolmogorov scale within the tra ditional inertial subrange, and that this scale appears to increase with Reyno lds number. This paper will be organized as follows. First, constraints on and relation- ships between structure functions will be discussed. Recen t results on structure function and pressure structure function scaling will be di scussed in the context that different scalings for the same order imply the existenc e of a statistically signficant length scale within the inertial subrange where s caling properties of at least some structure functions could change. Next, there will be a discussion of existing experimental and observational results before showing new analysis of experimental data up to Rλ= 3200. The analysis will use SL,T 2andS3to define the minimum limits over which inertial subrange scali ng analysis can be applied before the results for the ζL,T pforp= 4 and 6 are presented. Then the numerical analysis will be presented in a similar manner. 32 Constraints This section discusses kinematical constraints upon struc ture functions, related quantities, and what can be measured. There are only a few har d constraints for the scaling of small pstructure functions. For p= 2, assuming isotropy and homogeniety and for a long enough inertial subrange, ζL 2=ζT 2is expected. The classical value for ζ2is 2/3 (5), which is closely related to assuming that the energy spectrum goes as E(k) =ckǫ2/3k−5/3(5) where cKis the experimentally determined Kolmogorov constant and ǫis the equivalently either the rate of energy dissipation or the ra te of energy transfer to small scales. With crossed wires, only one-dimensional lon gitudinal or transverse spectra can be found, but with a numerical simulation the ful l energy spectrum can be obtained in three-dimensions. An example from the 5123forced data set to be discussed is shown in Figure 1. This spectrum is found be tween a lower wavenumber, large-scale, forcing or integral scale Land a high wavenumber, small-scale, dissipation scale η= (ν/ǫ)1/4, with kη= 1/η. The theoretical basis for predicting a -5/3 spectrum is the p resumption of a local, uniform energy cascade. There is no constraint requ iring -5/3 or the corresponding ζ2= 2/3 for structure functions and corrections to the ζ2= 2/3 are claimed [9]. However, no corrections to a -5/3 energy sp ectrum have been seen in numerical spectrum such as Figure 1 and for the la rgest range of scales observationally [10]. How could two supposedly equi valent measures of turbulent scaling, the energy spectrum and the 2nd order str ucture functions, yield two inconsistent results concerning intermittency? A suggestion below is that dissipation range effects on SL 2are more persistent than thought. Forp= 3, by balancing transfer and dissipation terms in the Karma n- Howarth equation [11, 12], ζ3≡1 is expected. This is the only fixed constraint on the ζpfor isotropic, homogeneous turbulence regardless of inter mittency and yields Kolmogorov’s 4/5 law for S3(r) S3(r) =−4 5ǫr (6) However, linear in rbehavior is never observed exactly (see discussion with figure 2). This effect has been quantified [13] and it was shown t hat the peak of −S3/r, after being compensated for the effects of forcing and dissi pation, has a Reynolds number dependence like ls/L∼R−3/5 λ, whereas λ/L∼R−1 λ. This could suggest the existence of a dynamically significant pos ition in the inertial subrange that does not scale with either the small Kolmogoro v scale or the large scale and has been interpreted in terms of an enstrophy produ ction argument [14]. While it is difficult to obtain a clean power law for p= 3, it is even harder to get convincing power laws when plotting Spversus rforp >3. A device 4Figure 1: Three-dimensional kinetic energy spectrum E(|k|) for the 5123forced calculation. The dashed line has an exponent of -5/3 and kη=kmax= 256. The dissipation spectrum ǫ(k) =νk2E(k) with a peak at k= 34 is shown. Resolution is determined by the ratio of the wavenumber of th e peak of the dissipation spectrum (here k≈kη/30 = 34) to kmax. Experience has shown that a ratio of at least 5 provides adequate resolution. 5that has been used to determine higher order ζpis to make the assumption that even if −S3∼ris not exact, if it is assumed to be exact then much stronger power laws for the Sp,p≥4, can be obtained by plotting Spversus −S3rather than versus r. This is known as extended self-similarity or ESS [5]. Anoth er way of looking at ESS is that the Spare not true power laws all the way to the dissipation scale η, but only for r > Aη , where Ais large, and ESS allows one to extend scaling much closer to η. However, there is a question of how much of this is a mirage because the ESS scaling exponents as r→0 are trivially the classical values of p/3. The additional length scale Aηprobably should have no dynamical significance since it is a multiple of η, as will be discussed in section 3. Forp≥4, there are no rigorous constraints that the longitudinal a nd trans- verse structure functions should have the same ζp. However, it has been shown [15] that when all components of the velocity field− →uand all directions of− →∂x are considered that there are four rotationally invariant c ombinations of fourth- order derivative correlations that can be written entirely in terms of the strain eijand the vorticity ωiand have been discussed in detail [16]. Fe= (15/7)<(e2)2> < e2>2Feω= 3< ω2e2> < ω2>< e2>(7) Fωeeω= 3< ωieijejkωk> < ω2>< e2>Fω= (9/5)< ω4> < ω2>2 Under the assumptions of homogeneity and isotropy Feis equivalent to the longitudinal fourth-order derivative flatness FL 4that can be measured with a single hot-wire probe and is related to the r→0 limit of SL 4(r). To determine the other irrotational flatnesses as functions of Rλcan only be done at low Reynolds numbers with complicated probes [17] or simulatio ns [16, 18], which suggest that each has its own scaling with Reynolds number. With a crossed-wire probe, higher Reynolds number observat ions of the scal- ing of flatnesses related to the r→0 limit of the transverse and mixed structure functions could be determined. In addition to FL 4=Fℓℓℓℓ=< u4 1,1> / < u2 1,1>2=Fe (8) these are FM 4=Fℓℓtt=< u2 1,1u2 2,1> < u2 1,1>< u2 2,1>(9) and FT 4=Ftttt=< u4 2,1> < u2 2,1>2(10) which can be related to combinations of the irrotational flat nesses (7). The scal- ing of FM 4andFT 4should be dominated by their most intermittent components, which the analysis of the irrotational components indicate s isFω[16]. 6Generalized structure functions should involve not only mo re than one ve- locity direction, but also more than one spatial position an d direction. All of the structure functions discussed so far involve different v elocity components, but only one spatial position and direction. In this class wo uld be included structure functions where the angle between− →uand− →∂xis not 0 or 90◦[19]. The different rotationally invariant flatnesses (7) involve different velocity and spatial directions, but only one position, r= 0. It should be noted that a new type of structure function that uses two spatial positions i n the same direction, has recently come into use in conjunction with fusion models [20]. These are similar to the dissipation-dissipation correlation funct ions< ǫxǫx+r>where the two distances would be 0 (the derivative for dissipation ) and the separation rbetween the two locations of dissipation ǫ. While generalized structure functions could only be comple tely determined by numerical simulations or complicated probes at low Reyno lds numbers, some insight might be gained by considering whether their number could be reduced. First, a way of systematically writing these down is needed [ 24]. However, unlike the way all fourth order derivative correlations can be expressed in terms of just four irrotational correlations, no simple reductio n to a small number of fourth order structure functions has been found. What can be said is that if this number could be reduced, it would have to satisfy two rotatio nal groups, one for position and the other for the velocity components [25]. The full group would correspond to the spin plus angular momentum group in quantu m mechanics. Even if such a reduction does not exist, one would expect some general properties to hold among all fourth-order structure functions. For exa mple, if there is a subrange where the longitudinal and transverse structure functions, SL 4(r) andST 4(r), do have the same scaling, then maybe all fourth-order stru cture functions, including those related to fusion rules, are rel ated in a similar manner. Or if there is a subrange where SL 4(r) and ST 4(r), do not have the same scaling, then relationships such as the fusion rules should not apply . This leads us to three fourth-order structure functions mea surable with crossed wire probes, each corresponding to one of the three d erivative flatnesses (8-10). The longitudinal, mixed and transverse fourth-ord er structure functions are SL 4=Sℓℓℓℓ=<(u(x+r)−u(x))4> SM 4=Sℓℓtt=<(u(x+r)−u(x))2(v(x+r)−v(x))2> (11) ST 4=Stttt=<(v(x+r)−v(x))4> whose general moment form is given by eqns. 13.83-13.84 of [2 6]. However, the general moment form in no more fundamental than (11) in terms of the full rotational group. One would expect that if there are differen t scalings for the derivative flatnesses (7) under Rλ, there should also be correspondingly different ζL,M,T p , with ζM pandζT pmore strongly dominated by the vorticity statistics. 73 Why two length scales? Another way of looking at the fourth-order velocity structu re functions is to consider the second order pressure structure function P2(r). This is related to a combination of fourth-order velocity structure function s (11) by [27] P2(r) =<(p(x+r)−p(x))2>=−1 3SL 4(r)+4 3r2/integraldisplay∞ ry−3[SL 4(y)+ST 4(y)−6SM 4(y)]dy (12) +4 3/integraldisplayr 0y−1[ST 4(y)−3SM 4(y)]dy Assuming SL 4(r)∼ζL 4,ST 4(r)∼ζT 4, and SM 4(r)∼ζM 4then P2(r) =−1 3(1 +4 2−ζL 4)SL 4(r) +4 3(1 ζT 4−1 2−ζT 4)ST 4(r) −4(1 ζM 4−2 2−ζM 4)SM 4(r) For the purposes here, the particular numerical prefactors are not important. The point to be made is that if the fourth-order longitudinal and transverse structure functions have different scalings, then P2should have different scaling at the two ends of the inertial subrange. Assume that SL 4∼rζL 4andST 4∼rζT 4 withζL 4> ζT 4and the scaling for SM 4between these. Then for rsmall, P2would be dominated by the scaling of ST 4and for large rbySL 4, with some crossover length scale in the middle of the inertial subrange marking t he separation be- tween two regimes for the scaling of P2. Related to P2(r) is the pressure spectrum Sp(k). It has been suggested [28] that the dependence of P2(k) on the spectral equivalents of the dissipation- dissipation correlation function < ǫxǫx+r>and also <ΩxΩx+r>and a cross correlation <Ωxǫx+r>places a kinematical constraint upon exponents for these correlations, and therefore the related fourth-order velo city structure functions. The relation used to show this is Sp(k) =ǫ2 4k4ν2[Eǫ(k) +EΩ(k)−EM(k)] (13) where Eǫ(k),EΩ(k), and EM(k) are the spectral versions of < ǫxǫx+r>,ν2< ΩxΩx+r>, and ν <Ωxǫx+r>respectively. If each goes as Eǫ(k) =Cǫǫ2k−1(kL)−µǫ(14) with corresponding µΩandµMforEΩ(k) and EM(k), it is then argued that unless µǫ=µΩ=µMfor all kthere will be divergences in Sp(k) asν→0. This is a reasonable conclusion for k→0. However, for k > k λ∼1/λwhere k4 λν2∼O(1), there is no need for this requirement. Therefore, there could be 8a kinematical constraint for 0 < k < k λrequiring that µǫ=µΩ=µx. Relating this to physical space, there would be a constraint that ζL=ζT=ζMas r−→0 and Rλ−→ ∞ . This will be shown to be consistent with the analysis in sections (4,5). For kλ< k < k η, there would be no constraint, so that it would be possible that µǫ/ne}ationslash=µΩ/ne}ationslash=µMandζL/ne}ationslash=ζT/ne}ationslash=ζMasr−→η, which is also indicated by the analysis here. What would be most satisfyin g would be if the pressure spectrum itself showed a clear break near k= 1/λ. This has now been found in the pressure analysis of the 10243data to be discussed here [29]. 4 New experimental evidence There have been numerous experimental and observation stud ies of turbulence designed to determine the scaling of structure functions an d related measures of intermittency such as the dissipation-dissipation corr elation function (2). However, careful examination raises several questions. Fi rst, while the high- est Reynolds number observations [7] do find that ζT(p)/ne}ationslash=ζL(p), when ESS is used, compared with lower Reynolds number results, the diffe rence is noticeably less. This suggests that in the very high Reynolds number lim it the difference could go to zero. On the other hand, ESS might be giving a false impression of good scaling since the ratios ST p(r)/SL p(r) as functions of rdo not show good scaling behavior to as small a scale as plotting with ESS does . A recurrent limitation is that scales below λin experimental and observational analysis are usually not shown, perhaps because it is felt that the small s cales are less reli- able. For example, the dissipation-dissipation correlati on function exponent is expected to be µ≈0.25 from the observed value of ζL 6≈1.78. This is con- firmed by several high Reynolds number measurements ([10, 22 ] and references therein), but only for r≥λ. It is noted [22] that lower Rλexperiments tend to give µ≈0.5. One moderate Reynolds number ( Rλ= 400) experiment for a circular jet [23] that shows µ≈0.2 forr≥λ, also shows a breakdown in scaling of< ǫxǫx+r>forr < λ that could be with the origin of µ≈0.5 at low Rλ. The new experimental analysis comes from data from two exper iments at the Moscow wind tunnel that has been used to investigate a num ber of funda- mental issues involving turbulent spectra and structure fu nctions [10, 30]. The two experiments are for a mixing layer ML at Rλ=2100 and a return chan- nel RC at Rλ=3200, which are the highest Reynolds number laboratory dat a sets available with both longitudinal and transverse veloc ities. The advantage of an experiment over atmospheric observations is that an ex periment offers more controlled conditions, which could be especially impo rtant for determin- ing transverse structure functions since any inherent anis otropy in the flow could affect their values. With respect to this, an important point to remember in the following discussion is that the ML data set is very anisotro pic and RC data set is nearly completely isotropic. Therefore, only the RC, Rλ= 3200 experimental data can be directly compared to the isotropic numerical dat a to be presented. 9Figure 2: The normalized third-order velocity structure fu nctions. φu,3=−< ∆u3 r> /(< ǫ > r ).×, ML; ◦, RC. The vertical down and up arrows indicate the classical inertial-range bounds ( rηandrL) for ML and RC, respectively. The isotropic value of φu,3(r) = 0.8 is shown by the solid line. 10The ML data set is included to show that most of the relevant pr operites also appear when there is anisotropy. Extended self-similarity will not be used in order to emphasize the regimes with simple scaling and where this breaks down within the inertial subrange. It will be shown that the scali ngs of all of the measured higher-order structure functions change within t he inertial subrange. Figure 3: The normalized second-order velocity structure f unctions. φL,T s,2=< ∆s2 r> /(< ǫ > r )2/3.◦, s=u, φ u,2=φL 2;×, s=w, φ w,2=φT 2.η= 0.00018 and 0.00014 for ML and RC respectively. Arrows are rηandrL. The vertical arrows indicate the classical inertial-range bounds. Figure 2 shows the third-order longitudinal structure func tions −S3(r) di- vided by rfor ML and RC. Excluding using the absolute value, all odd ord er transverse-only structure functions are zero. Figure 2 use s arrows to indicate the inertial subrange based upon the regime over which −S3(r)/ris constant for ML and RC. For ML and RC respectively, at the large scale arrow s are lengths rL=L/5 and L/6 and at the small scales lengths rη= 30ηand 25 η. Fig- ure 3 shows the second-order longitudinal SL 2(r) and transverse ST 2(r) structure functions for ML and RC. For SL 2(r), at large rthere is scaling out to an rLcon- 11sistent with rLfromS3(r) in Figure 2. In addition, there is a new large length that we will call r4/3< rLover which the isotropic relation ST 2(r)≈(4/3)SL 2(r) holds. r4/3is smaller than the range over which the longitudinal second order structure function SL 2has good scaling behavior, which is roughly out to rL, but is consistent with the maximum rfor which the transverse second order structure function ST 2has good scaling. For ML and RC, r4/3=L/30 and L/25 respectively. The small length scale rηis roughly where the one must begin to apply extended self-similarity, ESS, (section 2) if one i s to get good scaling relationships for the higher order longitudinal structure functions down to the Kolmogorov scale η. The reason rηis being introduced is to clearly indicate that any new length scale between rηandr4/3orrLis fully within the inertial subrange. While r4/3< rLat large scales, the range over which the 4/3 rule forSL,T 2(r) seems to fit at small scales extends to r < r η. This would be con- sistent with how extended self-similarity extends scaling regimes more into the dissipation regime. Figures 4(a-d) plot the logarithmic derivatives of the four th and sixth-order longitudinal and transverse structure functions. For four th and higher order structure functions there are no isotropy relationships th at would require that ST phave the same scaling as SL pover the entire inertial subrange, only the pressure spectum argument (section 3) that ζT 4should equal ζL 4forr > λ . Consistent with the pressure spectrum argument, there is a r egime in Figures 4(a-d) where the higher order structure functions do have th e same scaling, between two lengths, r4/3and a new small length scale that we will call rS> rη. Referring to Table 1 for ML ( Rλ≈2100) and RC ( Rλ≈3200), rS= 60ηand 50ηrespectively while λ=R1/2 λη≈46ηand 56 ηrespectively. So rS≈λ, but it is also roughly twice the value of rη. For r < r S, both ζT pandζL pincrease rapidly from their r > r Sconstant values, with ζL pincreasing the fastest. This analysis shows a regime within even the rather strict de finition of a measurable inertial subrange defined by rη< r < r 4/3where universal scaling of longitudinal and transverse structure functions is foun d and therefore as- sumptions of refined self-similarity might apply. In additi on, there is a regime forr < r Swhere both the longitudinal and transverse scaling exponen ts diverge from constant behavior. Praskovsky’s analysis shows that i f scaling functions were fitted over the entire inertial subrange, that different exponents for the longitudinal and transverse structure functions would be f ound that would be consistent with recent experiments [7] and simulations [3, 6]. 5 New numerical evidence To determine more clearly how significant the differences bet ween the longitu- dinal and transverse structure functions are, it is necessa ry to see some trends. For this purpose we now move to analysis of a 5123forced calculation of isotropic 12Figure 4: The local slopes ζL,T p(r) =dlog[SL,T p(r)]/dlog(r), p= 4,6. s=u forζL pands=wforζT p.◦, ζu,p(r) =ζL p(r);×, ζw,p(r) =ζT p(r);∗, Rp(r) = SL p(r)/ST p(r). The outer small vertical arrows indicate the classical in ertial range bounds, rηandrL, while the inner large vertical arrows indicated the new bounds, rSandr4/3, where ζT p≈ζL p. 13turbulence in a periodic box with Rλ= 262 and another 10243calculation with Rλ= 390. The cleaner numerical data also allows one to more dire ctly compare SL 2andST 2and to apply extended self-similarity. The simulations are classic turbulence simulations in a per iodic box with the lowest band of wavenumber modes forced to have constant ener gy by Gaussian white noise. Statistics were taken several eddy turnover ti mes after any large excursions in the dissipation due to the initial conditions have dissappeared and once the dissipation rate had settled to the point where it wa s varying by less than 5% on the timescale of several eddy turnover times. Expe rience has shown that this type of Gaussian white noise forcing yields stable statistics over a single eddy turnover time. The 5123simulations were not dealiased and the statistics represent an average over 40 large scale eddy turnover times done on the Cray T3D of the IDRIS Institute in Orsay, France. The 10243calculations were done on a Fujitsu VOO5999/56 at the Nagoya University Compution C enter and represent an average over 1.1 large scale eddy turnover time s. How well the 10243calculation satisfies isotropy relations for SL,T 2(r) and S3(r) is discussed elsewhere [31]. Figure 1 is the three-dimensional kinetic e nergy spectrum for the 5123calculation, showing a clear -5/3 regime. The Kolmogorov sc aleηis half the mesh size η= ∆x/2. This is considered adequate resolution because the peak of the dissipation spectrum, roughly where the -5/3 regime rolls over into the dissipation regime, is at k≈kη/30 where kη= 2π/η. In the experiments above, the original definition of an inert ial subrange placed the smallest scale useful for analysis at about rη= 25η, roughly the scale associated with the peak of the dissipation spectrum. This definition of rηwould make it greater than λfor both simulations, which for Rλ= 262 is λ≈16ηand for Rλ= 390 is λ≈20η. Therefore, a quantitative means of choosing rηmust be determined that can be applied equally to simulation s at lower Reynolds number and the Rλ= 3200 experiments. A difficulty in choosing a method is that the simulations are not at high enough a Reyno lds number to exhibit either a clearly defined linear regime in S3or a long regime where the isotropy relationship between SL 2andST 2is obeyed. The problem is illustrated by Figure 5, which plots −S3(r)/(.8ǫr) and the normalized form with the viscous correction DLLL(r) =−S3(r) + 6ν∂SL 2(r) ∂r .8ǫr. (15) While the span over which DLLL(r) is 1 indicates that there is an energy cascade, an inertial subrange over which −S3(r)/.8ris flat as in the experiments in Figure 2 is not seen. Therefore, arbrtrarily a inertial subrange wi ll be chosen as those rwhere −S3(r)/(.8ǫr)>0.8. This is the consistent with how rηwas chosen for the RC experiment and gives consistent values of rηfor the 5123and 10243 simulations and the RC experiment. Based upon Figure 5, an in ertial subrange can be defined between r/η=19 and 193. 14Figure 5: −S3(r)/(.8ǫr). Also shown is ( −S3(r) + 6ν∂SL 2(r)/∂r)/(.8ǫr). An arbitrary constant line is drawn to indicate where an inerti al subrange is defined. ris with respect to the size of the box (2 π)2 15Let us now use SL 2(r) and ST 2(r) to consider this definition of an inertial subrange using the isotropic relationship in 3D between the transverse and lon- gitudinal structure functions. ST 2(r) =SL 2(r) +r 2∂SL 2(r)/∂r (16) In the inertial subrange where S2(r)∼r2/3, from (16) one gets ST 2(r)∼ (4/3)SL 2(r). As r→0,S2(r)∼r2, so one gets ST 2(r)∼2SL 2(r). Figure 6 shows the second-order longitudinal and transverse struct ure functions divided byr2/3.ST 2(r)/r2/3is plotted twice, first divided by 4/3 to demonstrate how well the inertial range relation is obeyed and then divided b y 2 to demonstrate the approach to the dissipation range. The 4/3 rule in Figure 6 is only approached at the largest scal es, for r greater than where −S3(r)/(.8ǫr) is greatest in Figure 5, which could be called rmax. For r < r maxin Figure 6, the gradient of SL 2(r) is slightly steeper than ther2/3prediction, which would be consistent with measurements of a small correction over many years that is usually interpreted as du e to intermittency. However, ST 2(r) does not show this correction, and since it is ST 2(r) which forms the major portion of the energy (4/5ths), it should not be sur prising that the energy spectrum (Figure 1) is very close to -5/3. If the slope inSL 2(r)/r2/3is a dissipation range effect, then one could compensate for this in analysis of higher order structure functions by using a new ESS variable based u ponSL 2(r) RL 2= (SL 2(r))3/2/ǫ, (17) rather than −S3(r). This is done below. For direct comparison with the experiments, Figures 7a and 7 b show the logarithmic derivative of the 4th and 6th order structure fu nctions for Rλ= 262 against rand Figure 8 shows SL,M,T 4 (r) forRλ= 390. As in Figure 4, there is a span we will define as rL> r > r Swhere the slopes of the longitudinal and transverse structure functions are constant, but in thi s case they are not identical. In the experiments, rSwas chosen to be the first r(from below) where ζT p(r)/ne}ationslash=ζL p(r). Since there is no regime where ζT p(r) =ζL p(r) in the simulations, the choice of rSis more subjective for the simulations. We have chosen rSto be where a line of constant ζ4= 1.28 at large rwould meet a line with a logarithmic dependence through ζT 4at small r. The results are given in Table 1 and are similar to the experiments in that rSis greater than rη, the lower limit that was defined for inertial range behavior in S3. What is particularly similar to the experiments in Figure 7 i s that for r < r S, allζL,T pincrease and this increase is greater for ζL pthan for ζT p. There is also a clear trend where the difference between ζT pandζL pdefined as δp= min r{ζL p−ζT p} (18) 16Figure 6: SL 2(r)/r2/3(line) and ST 2(r)/r2/3plotted twice. Once divided by 4/3 to show the inertial subrange (dash) and once divided by 2 to show the dissipation range (dot-dash). 17Figure 7: ζ4(r) and ζ6(r) for Rλ= 262. Also shown are ST 4(r)/SL 4(r), ST 6(r)/SL 6(r) and extended self-similarity using RL 2(17) is applied. 180.50.60.70.80.911.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.922.12.22.32.42.5 1 10 100 1000Local Exponents r/ηζL 4 ζT 4 ζM 4 ζL 3 Figure 8: ζL 4(r),ζT 4(r),ζM 4andζ3forRλ= 390. 19is decreasing as Rλincreases, pointing to the experiments where ζT p≈ζL pfor r > r s. Applying ESS with R2brings the slopes back down for r < r S, long regimes for scaling SL 4(r3) and SL 6(r3) appear, and the differences between ζT pandζL p appear more clearly. For the Rλ= 262 simulation, Figure 9 shows different ζT pandζL pthat are consistent with earlier work in the same Reynolds nu mber regime [3, 4, 6]. However, the long regime of nearly constant ζL pshould now be considered an artifact of using ESS and the need to apply ES S seems to be intimately tied to the new length rS, where rSis not simply a constant times eta. Figure 9: ζL pandζT pforRλ= 262. Values are taken at r/η= 188. SL is the She-Leveque formula [32], which is an excellent fit to the obs ervations. p/3 is the classical prediction. 6 Discussion In Kerr [16], in addition to velocity statistics, equivalen t passive scalar and mixed velocity-scalar statistics were calculated. It was n oted that the scaling of 20case Rλδ4δ6rηrS λ 5123262 .2 .35 27 η27η16η 10243390 .05 22 η40η20η ML 2100 0 0 30 η60η46η RC 3200 0 0 25 η50η56η Table 1: Dependence of δp=ζL p−ζT p(18),rηandrSon case and Rλ. the derivative flatness for a passive scalar θ F∂θ4=F∇θ= (9/5)<(∇θ)4> /(<(∇θ)2>)2(19) was similar to the vorticity flatness Fω, that is zθ 4[33] and zω 4were both much larger than the exponent ze 4forFL 4=Fe. There was also a strong anti- correlation between the scalar derivative and vorticity, t hat is F∇θω2=<(− →∇θ·− →ω)2> / < (∇θ)2>< ω2> < 1 (20) Taking this analogy between the statistics of the scalar gra dient and vorticity a step further, if the scaling of F∇θcould be used as a tool for determining the scaling of Fω, then high Reynolds experiments for temperature statistic s [34] could have been implying greater scaling exponents in the tr ansverse derivative correlations and greater deviations from classical struct ure function exponents long before the new work with crossed-wire probes. However, without more theoretical understanding and corroborating evidence fro m velocity structure functions, these hints were not studied further. The theoretical, experimental and numerical discussion he re replaces that speculation with moderate to high Reynolds numbers experim ental and numer- ical data about the behavior of the transverse structure fun ctions. The impor- tant points are that for p >3 that ζT p≈ζL pforr > r SasRλ−→ ∞ , where rSis further into the inertial subrange than expected, and tha t none of the ζp’s show simple scaling behavior for r < r S. Table 1 shows δ4,δ6,rη,rSandλ for the numerical cases of Rλ= 262 and Rλ= 390 and the experimental cases ML (Rλ= 2100) and RC ( Rλ= 3200). Between ML and RC, mixing layer and return channel, the trend for rηandrSis opposite that between the much lower Reynolds number simulations and the experiments. Thi s is probably just a reflection of the influence of anisotropy for ML. The overall trend supports the existence of a length scale rSthat is much larger than η, with the scaling ofrSas a function of Rλintermediate between that for ηand that for λ. The theoretical discussion showed that this second small le ngth scale would not be expected if the energy cascade and the refined similari ty hypothesis were controlled only by the statistics of the dissipation ǫ. For there to be a dynamically significant length scale within the inertial su brange, there must be 21something in addition to ǫcontrolling the cascade, the fundamental dissipation mechanism must involve two length scales, or both. This pape r addresses only one kind of higher order statistic, the structure functions . Clearly a thorough analysis of all higher order statistics, including pressur e and the dissipation- dissipation correlation function, needs to be done on avail able measurements and simulations from the point of view of determining whethe r some length scale of the order of the Taylor microscale has a role for them also. This has been done for pressure spectra for the 10243data set used here [29] and the results are consistent with the existence of such a length scale separat ing spectral regimes of -7/3 and -5/3. Either numerically or observationally, consistent condit ions over a wide range of Reynolds numbers are necessary if any conclusions are to b e drawn. This is difficult to obtain with atmospheric measurements. As an exam ple, for one series of atmospheric measurements over a wide range of Reyn olds number, < ǫxǫx+r>has been determined over the entire inertial subrange [10]. For larger r, there is convergence to µ≈0.2, but there is an enormous scatter between different measurements at smaller rso that any Rλdependence in the equivalent of rSfor< ǫxǫx+r>would be difficult to determine. Therefore, well- controlled high Reynolds number experiments would be very u seful. This could also provide a motivation for doing a careful 20483forced simulation, which is now feasible. If confirmed, what could be the dynamical significance of this crossover length scale beyond just being an average between the integr al scale and the Kolmogorov scale? To date, no importance has been attached t o the Taylor microscale λbeyond that of an average. When the first visualizations of vo r- tex filaments were done [16], one way of characterizing them w as they had a width the order of the Kolmogorov microscale and a length the order of the Taylor microscale. However, in a 643or 1283DNS, it would be impossible to determine whether the length was λ, a fraction of the size of the box, or just a multiple of η. That is, the the radius of curvature might just be a multiple ofη. The highest resolution visualizations of isotropic, homog eneous turbulence [35] would support this scenario. That is, vortex filaments are ob served, but they do not snake through the entire domain and instead have a leng th that appears to be a only a multiple of η. However, it can be argued that these are hy- perviscous calculations that are predisposed to shortenin g the vortex filaments. Furthermore, statistical models based strictly upon vorte x filaments [32, 36] do not seem capable of producing different longitudinal and tra nsverse scaling in the high Reynolds number limit. Therefore, it seems that some other type of dynamical object besides sim- ple filaments would be needed if a theoretical basis for a seco nd dynamically significant length scale is to be given. The only dynamical st ructure that has been identified in either turbulence or idealized calculati ons of Navier-Stokes and Euler that self-generates two small length scales is the structure found in the interaction of two anti-parallel vortex tubes as the pea k vorticity appears 22to be developing a singularity [37]. However, the spectrum o f this structure is k−3, nowhere near k−5/3. So until high Reynolds number, very highly resolved calculations are done for Navier-Stoke vortex reconnectio n, any connection be- tween the properties of this structure and the scaling prope rties of turbulence is pure conjecture. Acknowledgements. NCAR is supported by the U.S. National Sc ience Foun- dation. R.M.K. wishes to thank Service d’Astrophysique, Ce ntre d’Etudes de Saclay for support. M.M. wishs to thank the Centre National d e Recherche Scientifique of France for computing support. T.G. thanks de eply to Nagoya University Computation Center for supporting the computat ion and to the sup- port of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C-2 096402 60) by The Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan. References [1] A.N.,Kolmogorov “A refinement of previous hypotheses co ncerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number.” J. Fluid Mech. 13, 82-85 (1962). [2] G.,Stolovitzky,P.,Kailasnath, and K.R.,Sreenivasan “Kolmogorov’s refine similiarity hypotheses..” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1178-1181 (1992). [3] O.N.,Boratav, and R.B.,Pelz “ Structures and structure functions in the inertial range of turbulence.” Phys. Fluids 9, 1400-1415 (97). [4] J.A. Herweiger and W. van de Water, 1995: Transverse stru cture functions of turbulence. Advances in Turbulence V , R. Benzi ed., Kluwer, 210-216. (Proceedings of the Fifth European Turbulence Conference, Siena, Italy, 5-8 July 1995.) [5] R.,Benzi,S.,Ciliberto,C.,Baudet,G.R.,Chavarria, a nd R.,Tripiccione “Ex- tended self-similarity in the dissipation range of fully de veloped turbulence.” Europhys. Lett. 24, 275- (1993). [6] Chen, S., Sreenivasan, K.R., Nelkin, M. and Cao, N. “Refin ed similarity hypothesis for transverse structure functions in fluid turb ulence.” Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2253-2256 (97). [7] Dhruva, B., Tsuji, Y., Sreenivasan, K.R., “Transverse s tructure functions in high-Reynolds-number turbulence.” Phys. Rev. E. 56, R4928-R4930 (97). [8] M.E.,Brachet “Direct simulation of three-dimensional turbulence in the Taylor-Green vortex.” Fluid Dyn. Res. 8, 1-8 (1991). [9] F.,Anselmet,Y.,Gagne,E.J.,Hopfinger, and R.A.,Anton ia “High-order ve- locity structure functions in turbulent shear flow..” J. Flu id Mech. 140, 63- (1984). 23[10] A.,Praskovsky, and S.,Oncley “Measurements of the Kol mogorov constant and intermittency exponent at very high Reynolds numbers.. ” Phys. Fluids 6, 2886-2888 (1994). [11] A.N.,Kolmogorov “The local structure of turbulence in incompressible vis- cous fluid for very large Reynolds number” Dokl. Akad. Nauk. S SSR30, 9-13 (1941). (reprinted in Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 434, 9-13 (1991).); “Dissipa- tion of energy in locally isotropic turbulence” Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 31, 99-101 (1941). (reprinted in Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 434, 99-101 (1991).). [12] U.,Frisch Turbulence: the legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov (Cam. Univ. Press, 1995). [13] F.,Moisy,P.,Tabeling, and H.,Willaime “Kolmogorov e quation in fully de- veloped turbulence..” Phys. Rev. Lett. April , - (2000). [14] E.A.,Novikov “Statistical balance of vorticity and a n ew scale for vortical structures in turbulence..” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2718-2720 (1993). [15] Siggia, E.D., “Invariants for the one-point vorticity and strain rate corre- lations.” Phys. Fluids 24, 1934-1936 (81). [16] Kerr, R. M., “Higher order derivative correlations and the alignment of small–scale structures in isotropic numerical turbulence .” J. Fluid Mech. 153, 31-58 (85). [17] E.Kit,A.,Tsinober,J.L.,Balint,,,J.M., and Wallace ,E.Levich “An experi- mental study of helicity related properties of a turbulent fl ow past a grid..” Phys. Fluids 30, 3323-3325 (1987). [18] A.,Vincent, and M.,Meneguzzi “The spatial structure a nd statistical prop- erties of homogeneous turbulence.” J. Fluid Mech. 225, 1-25 (1991). [19] I.,Arad,B.,Dhruva,S.,Kurien,V.S.,L’vov, I.,Proca ccia, and K.R.,Sreenivasan “The extraction of anisotropic contribu tions in turbulent flows..” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5330- (1998). [20] R.,Benzi,L.,Biferale, and F.,Toschi “Multiscale vel ocity correlations in turbulence..” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3244-3247 (1998). [21] M.,Nelkin “Do the dissipation fluctuations in high Reyn olds number tur- bulence define a universal exponent?.” Phys. Fluids 24, 556- (1981). [22] K.R.,Sreenivasan, and P.,Kailasnath “An update on the intermittency exponent in turbulence..” Phys. Fluids A 5, 512-514 (1993). [23] R.A,Antonia,B.R.,Satyaprakash, and A.K.M.F.,Hussa in “Statistics of fine- scale velocity in turbulent plane and circular jets..” J. Fl uid Mech. 119, 55-89 (1982). 24[24] S.A.,Orszag “Representation of isotropic turbulence by scalar functions” Stud. in Appl. Math. 48, 275-279 (1969). [25] Spector 1998, private communication. [26] A.S.,Monin,A.M.,Yaglom, and ed. J.L.,Lumley Statistical Fluid Mechan- ics, vol. 2 (M, 1975).IT Press. [27] R.J.,Hill, and J.M.,Wilczak “Pressure structure func tions and spectra for locally isotropic turbulence.” J. Fluid Mech. 296, 247-269 (1995). [28] M.,Nelkin “Enstrophy and dissipation must have the sam e scaling exponent in the high Reynolds number limit of fluid turbulence..” Phys . Fluids 11, 2202-2204 (1999). [29] T.,Gotoh“Pressure spectrum in very high Reynolds numb er turbulence.” (under preparation). [30] Praskovsky, A., Praskovskaya, E., and Horst, T., “Furt her experimental support for the Kolmogorov refined similarity hypothesis.” Phys. Fluids 9, 2465-2467 (1997). [31] D.,Fukayama,T.,Oyamada,T.,Nakano, T.,Gotoh, and K. ,Yamamoto “Lon- gitudinal structure functions in decaying and forced turbu lence.” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 69, 701-715 (2000). [32] She, Z-S. and E. Leveque, “Universal scaling laws in ful ly developed tur- bulence.” Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 336- (1994). [33] R.A.,Antonia, and A.J.,Chambers “On the correlation b etween turbulent velocity and temperature derivatives in the atmospheric su rface layer..” Boun. Lay. Met. 18, 399-410 (1980). [34] R.A.,Antonia,E.J.,Hopfinger,Y.,Gagne, and F.,Ansel met “Temperature structure functions in turbulent shear flows..” Phys. Rev. A .30, 2704-2707 (1984). [35] D.H.,Porter,A.,Pouquet, and P.R.,Woodward “Kolmogo rov-like spectra in decaying three-dimensional supersonic flows.” Phys. Flu ids6, 2133-2142 (1994). [36] G.,He,S.,Chen, and R.H.,KraichnanR.,Zhang,Y.,Zhou , “Statistics of Dis- sipation and Enstrophy Induced by Localized Vortices.” Phy s. Rev. Lett. 81, 4636-4639 (1998). [37] R.M.,Kerr “Evidence for a singularity of the three-dim ensional incompress- ible Euler equations..” Phys. Fluids A 5, 1725- (1993). 25

arXiv:physics/0005005v1 [physics.acc-ph] 3 May 2000ACUPRONICKEL ROTATING BAND PIONPRODUCTION TARGET FOR MUON COLLIDERS1 B. J. King2,S.S. Moser3, R.J. Weggel,BNL4;N.V. Mokhov,Fermilab5 Abstract A conceptualdesignis presentedfora highpowercupron- ickel pion production target. It forms a circular band in a horizontal plane with approximate dimensions of: 2.5 meters radius, 6 cm high and 0.6 cm thick. The target is continuously rotated at 3 m/s to carry heat away from the production region to a water cooling channel. Bunches of 16GeVprotonswithtotalenergiesof270kJandrepetition ratesof 15Hz areincidenttangentiallyto anarc ofthe tar- get alongthe symmetryaxis of a 20 Tesla solenoidal mag- netic capture channel. The mechanical layout and cooling setup are described. Results are presented from realistic MARSMonteCarlocomputersimulationsofthepionyield and energydepositionin the target. ANSYS finite element calculationsarebeginningtogivepredictionsfortheresu l- tant shockheatingstresses. 1 INTRODUCTION High power pion production targets are required in cur- rentscenarios[1]formuoncolliders. Thepionsecondaries fromprotonsonthetargetarecapturedinasolenoidalmag- netic channelanddecay intothe muonbunchesneededfor cooling, acceleration and injection into the collider ring . Bunchedprotonbeamsofseveralmegawattswillbeneeded for the currently specified muon currents [1]: approxi- mately 6×1020muonsofeachsignatrepetitionratesof15 Hertz and in bunches of up to 4×1012muons per bunch. Thisis an extrapolationfromtoday’shighpowertargetsin rate of target heating, shock stresses and integrated radia - tiondamageto thetarget. Because ofthehighbeampower,liquidmetal jettargets have been the subject of much recent study and form the bulk of a proposed experimental R & D program of tar- getry studies that has recently been submitted [2] to the BNL AGS Division. More conventionalsolid targets have severalchallenges. Alongwithconcernsaboutshockheat- ing stresses and radiation damage, it is challenging to de- signacoolingscenarioconsistentwithboththelargebeam power and the small target cross sections that are needed 1This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S.Depart ment of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-98CH10886. 2Submitting author, email: bking@bnl.gov . 3on academic leave from Saint Joseph’s College, Indiana. 4Brookhaven National Laboratory, P.O.Box 5000, Upton, NY11 973- 5000 5Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batav ia, IL 60510-0500 Figure1: A conceptualillustrationofthetargetrysetup. forhighpionyields. This paper introduces the idea of a solid target in the formofabandthataddressesthiscoolingissuebyrotating the band to carry heat away from the targetry region and througha coolingchannel. Figures 1 and 2 give schematic views of the targetry setup we are considering and figure 3 shows the trajectory of the protonbeaminto the targetband. It mustbe empha- sized that details such as the rollers and cooling setup are only shown schematically and no effort has been put into theirdesign. Thetargetbandisenclosedina20Teslasolenoidalmag- netic pioncapturemagnetwhosegeneraldesignhasprevi- ouslybeenstudied[1]bytheMuonColliderCollaboration (MCC).Themajordesignmodificationspecifictothispar- ticular geometry concerns the provision of entry and exit portsforthetargetband. The high-power bunched proton beam strikes the target band at a glancing angle and travels along inside the tar- get material for two nuclear interaction lengths before the curvature of the band bringsit again to an exit point at the outer edge of the band. The beam is tilted at 150 milli- radians to the longitudinal axis of the solenoidal magnet; MARS simulations described below show that this gives a largerpionyieldthana beamparalleltothe solenoid. 2 MARSSIMULATIONSOFTARGET HEATINGAND PIONYIELD Full MARS [3] tracking and showering Monte Carlo sim- ulations were conducted for a 16 GeV proton beam ofFigure 2: A conceptual illustration of the target layout aroundthepionproductionregion. Figure 3: The trajectory of the proton beam into the target band. 1×1014ppp with a repetition rate of 15 Hz on Ni band (R=250 cm, 6 cm height, 0.6 cm thickness) in a 20 T solenoid of R a=7.5 cm half-aperture. Both untilted tar- getsandtargetstiltedby α=150mradwerestudiedandde- tailed 3-dimensional maps of energy deposition densities were generatedforinputtothe ANSYSstress analyses. The yield per proton at 90 cm downstream from the central intersection of the beam with the target was de- termined for pions plus muons in the momentum range 0.05<p<0.8GeV/c. Theyieldsofpositiveandnegativepi- ons were, respectively, Y+= 0.491and Y−= 0.498at α=0 andY+= 0.622 and Y−= 0.612 at α=150 mrad. Figure 5 shows the momentum spectra for all hadrons and figure 6 gives more detailed information for the pions. Figure 7 showsthetimedistributionforwhenthesepionsareformed and figure 8 shows several scatter plots to illustrate their distributioninphasespace. Thesepionyieldsanddensitie s in phase space are comparably good to the predictions for the bestoftheliquidjet targetsunderconsideration. The peak energy deposition density was found to be 68.6 J/g per pulse, corresponding to a temperature rise of∆T=150.5◦C. This corresponded to a total power dis-sipation in the target of 0.324 MW at α=150 mrad. Contributions to the deposited energy come from dE/dx from hadrons and muons (44%), electromagnetic shower- ing (46%) and from absorbtion of sub-threshold particles (10%). Powerdissipationininnerlayeroftungstenshield- ing(7.5 <r<15cm)wasalsodetermined,andwasfoundto be0.624MWat α=0and0.766MWat α=150mrad. −2 2 6 10 14 18 Azimuthal angle (deg)101102103104105Energy deposition density (mJ/g)−1.5 < r < −1 mm −0.5 < r < 0 mm 0.5 < r < 1 mm 1.5 < r < 2 mm 2.5 < r < 3 mm|y|<2.5 mm Figure4: Energydepositiondensityin the bandtarget ver- susazimuthalangleforatilt angle α=150mrad. 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 p (GeV/c)10−310−210−1100101102dN/dp (1/GeV/c per proton)p (0.491) n (3.922) π+ (0.823) π− (0.787) K+ (0.018) K− (0.012) Figure 5: Momentum spectra of hadrons at L=90 cm and R<7.5 cm for a tilt angle α=150 mrad. Integratedyield is showninparentheses. 3 ANSYS STRESS SIMULATIONS The survivability of solid targets in the face of repeated shock heating is probably the most challenging problem faced in these scenarios for pion productionfor muon col- liders. To investigate this, we are beginning to conduct finite elementcomputersimulationsoftheshockheatingstresses0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 p (GeV/c)0.00.51.01.5dN/dp (1/GeV/c per proton)π+ Y+=0.622 π− Y−=0.612Y at 0.05<p<0.8 GeV/c Figure 6: Pion momentum spectra at L=90 cm and R<7.5cmforatilt angle α=150mrad. 0 3 6 9 12 15 Time (nsec)10−410−310−210−1100dN/dt (pion/nsec)π+ π− Clock starts at z=13.6 cm Clock stops at z=90 cm Beam hits target at z~22.5 cm Figure 7: Pion time spectra at L=90 cm and R <7.5 cm for 0.05<p<0.8GeV/canda tilt angle α=150mrad. using ANSYS, a commercial package that is very widely used for stress and thermal calculations. These studies are still at anearlystage. It is encouraging that the instantaneous energy deposi- tion predicted by MARS of approximately 70 J/g per pro- ton pulse is much less than the 500-600 J/g depositions in microsecond timescales that the Fermilab pbar source nickel target routinely operates at1. Further, if the pre- dicted stresses turn out to be higher than, say, 50% of the target’stensilestrengththenpossibilitiesexistforred imen- sioning the target and the proton spot size to reduce the stress. 1Editting note: this sentence has been modified from the origi nal ver- sion, which erroneously referred to temperature rather tha n energy depo- sition.Figure8: π+(red)and π−(green)scatterplotsatL=90cm andR<7.5cm fora tilt angle α=150mrad. 4 CONCLUSIONS Inconclusion,initialstudiesindicatethatcupronickelr otat- ing band targetsmay well be a viable andattractive option to satisfy the difficult high power targetry requirements of muoncolliders. 5 REFERENCES [1] The Muon Collider Collaboration, “Status of Muon Collider Research and Development and Future Plans”, to besubmittedtoPhys. Rev. E. [2]Alessi etal.,“AnR&DProgramforTargetryandCap- ture at a Muon-Collider Source - A Proposal to the BNL AGS Division”. Spokesperson Kirk T. McDonald, email: mcdonald@puphep.princeton.edu. [3]N.VMokhov,“TheMARSCodeSystemUser’sGuide, Version13(98)”,FERMILAB-FN-628(Feb. 1998).

arXiv:physics/0005007v1 [physics.acc-ph] 3 May 2000Rotating Band Pion Production Targets for Muon Colliders an d Neutrino Factoriesa B.J. King Brookhaven National Laboratory, Building 901A, P.O. Box 50 00, Upton, NY11973 email: bking@bnl.gov web page: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking An update is presented on a conceptual design for a pion produ ction target station using a rotating cupronickel band and that was originally propose d for use at a muon collider facility with a 4 MW pulsed proton beam. After reviewing the s alient design features and motivations for this target, ongoing studies are descri bed that are attempting to benchmark the thermal stresses and radiation damage on the t arget band using data from the Fermilab antiproton source and other operating tar gets. Possible parameter optimizations and alternative technologies for the rotati ng band are surveyed, including discussion on the the various proton beam parameters that mi ght be encountered for rotating band targets at either muon colliders or neutrino f actories. Finally, an outline is proposed for a possible R&D path towards capability for th e actual construction of rotating band pion production targets. 1 Introduction and Motivation Conceptual design studies for muon colliders that have take n place since the mid- 1990’s have motivated the design of pion production targets that can operate and survive with megawatt-scale pulsed proton beams. Over the p ast few months, the design timescale and potential learning curve for such targ ets has effectively been abbreviated by the expanded interest in neutrino factories – muon storage rings ded- icated to producing neutrino beams that will require simila rly large muon currents to muon colliders and that have prospects for being built on a shorter timescale – perhaps to be ready within the next decade. We present an update on a previous report [1] describing a con ceptual design for a cupronickel rotating band pion production target for m uon colliders that was proposed as a relatively conservative extrapolation from e xisting targets. A more detailed write-up on this target is in progress [2]. (Note th at another rotating band design based on reference [1] is presented elsewhere in thes e proceedings [3].) The rotating band design is readily adaptable to neutrino fa ctories and, indeed, its conservative nature makes its development particularl y well matched to the shorter timescales for this application. Alternative, mor e exotic, targetry options that were originally proposed for muon colliders – such as pu lsed mercury jets – may involve extensive multi-year exploratory experimenta l R&D programs [4] that do not appear to be particularly compatible with the shorter timescales envisaged for neutrino factories. This paper is laid out as follows. General design considerat ions and strategies for high power solid targets form the topic of the following s ection. Sections 3 through section 5 then focus in on a review of the specific cupr onickel band design that was proposed in reference [1]. Specifically, section 3 g ives an overview of the aPresented at the ICFA/ECFA Workshop ”Neutrino Factories ba sed on Muon Storage Rings” (νFACT’99), Lyon, France, 5–9 July, 1999. 1conceptual design and strawman specifications, section 4 su mmarizes the results of computer simulations predicting its pion yield performanc e and characterizing the heating effects from the beam, and section 5 discusses stress and durability issues. Section 6 steps back from the parameters in [1] to examine the technology options and parameter optimizations available to the rotating band target concept for the spectrum of possible proton driver scenarios at both muon co lliders and neutrino factories. The paper concludes with comments on the potenti al for the rotating band target concept and with an outlook on the R&D program req uired to bring this conceptual design to practical fruition. 2 General Design Strategies for High Power Production Targe ts This section gives an overview of the general design goals th at were considered important when proposing the target design of reference [1] , and on the strategies employed to achieve these design goals. The intention was to design a target station that: 1. can be designed quickly and with relatively modest resour ces, so it will as- suredly not hold up the overall development of neutrino fact ories or muon colliders 2. will clearly survive any beam-induced stresses it might b e subjected to and have an acceptable lifetime 3. is relatively straightforward and affordable to build and maintain (including target replacement and disposal) 4. has pion yields per proton and phase space densities that a re as good as, or not much inferior to, what could be achieved with the more ide alized targets that could be designed for operating with low beam powers. The first item implies that the R&D program for such a target ca n be conducted mainly through paper studies, computer simulations and eng ineering computer- assisted design studies, perhaps augmented by a modest amou nt of mechanical pro- totyping and/or beam tests if convenient. Such an R&D progra m appears plausible for the strawman design scenario of reference [1]. Items 3 an d 4 also appear to be met by this scenario, as can be judged from the information pr esented in section 3 of this paper and elsewhere [1, 2]. The remainder of this section addresses item 2 in the list, si nce the single most difficult design constraint for rotating bands and other soli d targets for muon col- liders is the requirement of survivability in the face of ins tantaneous beam energies per proton pulse of order 100 kJ and megawatt-scale beam powe rs, i.e., comparable to or larger than the largest existing proton facilities. A s ound design strategy to satisfy item 2 is to choose beam and target parameters such th at the maximum ma- terial stresses and radiation exposures do not go beyond wha t has been explicitly achieved in existing targets or targetry studies. It is clea r that this can always be achieved in principle, even for the highest beam powers unde r consideration, by: 21. choosing a target material with appropriate mechanical p roperties and mod- erate thermal stresses, consistent with optimizing the pio n yield. In practice this might mean choosing from materials with medium atomic n umbers in the range from titanium (Z = 22) through nickel (Z = 28), as discus sed further in sections 4 and 6, and 2. sufficiently spreading out the spot size to cope with higher energy beam pulses, and 3. rotating or otherwise moving the target to continually ex pose new areas of the target to each beam pulse. This limits both the instantaneou s local thermal stresses and the lifetime radiation exposure of the target m aterial. Concerning the final item of strategy, the considerable pote ntial for designs that continually expose the beam to new target material is am ply illustrated by the tungsten target design for the proposed Accelerator Produc tion of Tritium (APT) project [5] at Los Alamos National Laboratory. A 1.7 GeV, 100 mA beam is con- tinually rastered across a 19 x 190 cm area of the APT tungsten target to limit the local heating and thermal shock stresses. Impressively , the projected 170 MW beam power onto the APT target is approximately two orders of magnitude larger than the applications considered in this paper. As a detailed difference from the approach for the APT, the ban d target uses the more traditional solution for high power targets of movi ng the target material rather than the beam spot. The idea of rotating or scanning hi gh-power targets has already found successful application in several existi ng facilities including, for example, the trolled tungsten-rhenium target for the SLC po sitron source [6] and the rotating nickel target at the BNL “g-minus-2” experimen t [7]. Target rotation can limit temperature rises and the consequent thermal stre sses on timescales of a second or less and, in the longer term, it spreads out the radi ation load over much more material. The Fermilab antiproton source target [8] is rotated more slowly than the preceding examples in order to spread out the radiat ion dose over the circumference of the target disk, as is discussed further in section 5. 3 A Conceptual Design and Straw-man Specifications for a Cupr onickel Rotating Band Target Table 1: Strawman parameters for the cupronickel target ban d, taken from reference [1]. target band radius (R) 2.5 m band thickness (t) 0.6 cm band width (w) 6 cm beam path length in band (L) 30 cm proton interaction lengths ( λ) 2 band tilt angle ( α)150 mrad band rotation velocity (v) 3 m/s 3Figure 1: A conceptual illustration of the targetry setup pr oposed in reference [1]. Figure 2: A conceptual illustration [1] of the target layout around the pion production region. Table 2: The proton beam parameters that correspond to the st rawman target parameters of table 1. Except for the beam spot size, which is specific to the target design, these parameters have been taken from reference [9] and are appropriate for th e muon collider specifications in that reference. parameter value beam energy 16 GeV protons per pulse (ppp) 1.0×1014 pulse energy 256 kJ pulse duration instantaneous ( <<1µsec) pulse repetition rate 15 Hz beam power 3.84 MW gaussian spot size σx= 1.5 mm, σy= 10 mm 4Figure 3: The trajectory of the proton beam into the cupronic kel target band [1]. The aspect ratio is very distorted – only a small chord of the target circumfer ence is shown. The discussion presented in this section and the two that fol low are specific to the cupronickel rotating band target design proposed in r eference [1], beginning with the overview of that conceptual design given in this sec tion. Figure 1 gives a schematic overview of the target concept pre sented in refer- ence [1] and figure 2 zooms in on the production region. It shou ld be emphasized that such details as the rollers and cooling setup are shown o nly schematically and that no concerted effort has been put into their design or layo ut. The cupronickel target band is enclosed in a 20 Tesla solenoidal magnetic pio n capture magnet whose general design has previously been studied [9] by the Muon Co llider Collaboration. The pion secondaries spiral along the solenoidal magnetic c hannel before decay- ing into the muon bunches needed for cooling, acceleration a nd injection into the collider ring. The radius of the solenoidal channel, 7.5 cm, and the magnetic field strength, 20 Tesla, are those commonly assumed for recent mu on collider studies [9]. The design modification specific to this particular geometry concerns the provision of entry and exit ports for the target band. Example coil geom etries [10] show that these ports can be provided with little modification to the de sign of the solenoidal channel. Table 1 gives some relevant parameters for the cupronickel b and and figure 3 illustrates the trajectory of the proton beam into the targe t band. The band param- eters correspond to the proton beam parameters for a muon col lider that are given in table 2. Different parameter values might be appropriate f or alternative beam scenarios at muon colliders or for neutrino factories. The g eometry of the band is chosen to approximately maximize the pion yield. The genera l requirements are that the proton pathlength through the target material shou ld be approximately 2 nuclear interaction lengths and that the band should be thin enough to allow most of the pions to escape the target. To optimize the pion yield [ 1], the trajectory of the beam through a chord of the target band is at a tilt angle of 150 milliradians to the axis of the solenoid. 5The cupronickel band is guided and powered by several sets of rollers that can be connected by driveshafts to remotely housed motors outside any radiation shielding. This scenario has been taken from the Zenzimmer mills that ar e used for pressing metal sheets and has the attraction of being mechanically ve ry simple in the high radiation area surrounding the production region. Bennett [3] even suggests the total elimination of moving parts other than the target band by using electromag- netic guidance and rotation of the target band by linear moto rs. Procedures for installation and extraction of the target band are proposed in reference [2]. The rotation rate of 3 m/s given in table 1 corresponds, for th e 15 Hz beam frequency, to a target advance per pulse by 1/3 of the chord sp anned by the proton beam. The three overlapping proton pulses in any part of the b and imply [1] a maximum total temperature rise approximately double the in stantaneous rise from each individual pulse. Temperature rises and stresses will be further discussed in section 5. A competing concern to the target heating stress that limits the acceptable rotation rate of the target is the eddy currents induced by th e rapidly rotating band in a strong magnetic field. The eddy current power is prop ortional to the conductivity and to the square of the band velocity and a very approximate analytic calculation [2] predicts that the power dissipated will be o f order several kW. This is more than an order of magnitude below the beam heating and s o is clearly a manageable heat source. The power will have to be supplied by the electric motor driving the rotation of the target and the requirements on th e drive mechanism are within typical operating parameters for Zenzimmer steel mi lls. Cupronickel alloys are preferred over both copper and nicke l for the particular targetry application considered in this paper because thei r lower electrical conduc- tivity will reduce the eddy currents from rotation through t he magnetic field of the solenoidal capture magnet. Cupronickel alloys such as, for example, alloy 715 pro- duced by Olin Brass [11] have essentially the same density an d interaction lengths as copper and nickel and have very similar mechanical proper ties. However, Olin alloy 715 has an electrical conductivity at 20 degrees centi grade of only 2.6 MS/m, compared to 58 MS/m for copper and 14 MS/m for nickel. The hot portion of the band is rapidly carried away from the pr oduction region into a water cooling channel, as is the case for the nickel pro duction target at the BNL g-2 experiment [7]. Although both the peak temperatu re and power are much larger than in the g-2 experiment, the surface area of th e band has been chosen large enough to give heat transfer rates of approxima tely 30 W /cm2[1] that are comfortable even in the presence of a steam boundary layer. It has been suggested [3] that the target and capture channel should be i n a helium atmosphere to allow the easy distillation of water vapor and any other im purities. This will have negligible effect [2] on pion production due to helium’s low density and low atomic number. 60.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 p (GeV/c)0.00.51.01.5dN/dp (1/GeV/c per proton)π+ Y+=0.622 π− Y−=0.612Y at 0.05<p<0.8 GeV/c Figure 4: Pion momentum spectra [1] at the plane 90 cm downstr eam from the central intersection of the beam with the target, determined for the beam and targe t parameters of tables 2 and 1, respectively. Table 3: A summary of the MARS Monte Carlo results and derivat ive predictions for pion yields and thermal parameters that were presented in reference [1] . The simulation used the target band and proton beam parameters of tables 1 and 2, corresponding t o a 3.84 MW proton beam power. parameter CuNi π+(π−) yield/proton 0.622 (0.612) peak energy deposition/pulse 69 J/g peak inst. temperature rise 151oC peak total temperature rise ∼300oC total power deposition in target band 0.324 MW average cooling rate 31 W.cm−2 4 Pion Yield Predictions and Thermal Parameters of the Cupro nickel Band Target Detailed MARS [12] tracking and showering Monte Carlo simul ations were per- formed [1] to obtain the pion yields per proton for the beam an d target parameters of [1] that are reproduced in tables 1 and 2. The graphical res ults in figure 4 cor- respond to yields of Y+= 0.622 and Y−= 0.612 positive and negative pions per proton for the momentum range 0.05 <p<0.80 GeV/c. The peak energy deposi- tion density was found to be 68.6 J/g per pulse, correspondin g to a temperature rise of ∆ T=151◦C and a total power dissipation in the target of 0.324 MW. Thes e predictions are summarized in table 3. These pion yields and the predicted phase space densities ar e almost identical to the best predicted yields for the exotic liquid mercury je t targets that are also under consideration [4] for muon colliders and neutrino fac tories. Optimization studies [13, 9] for both mercury jet and band targets further suggest that such 7yields are rather close to the optimum that could be obtained even for a low power proton beam, thus satisfying the fourth of the design goals s tated in section 2. 5 Stress and Durability Issues for the Cupronickel Band As an application of the design strategy presented in sectio n 2, this section exam- ines the possibilities for evaluating the survivability of the cupronickel band target through benchmarking to existing targets. The Fermilab ant iproton source tar- get [8] appears to be one of the most suitable targets for benc hmarking the band, so we begin by summarizing its design and operating paramete rs. The Fermilab antiproton target consists of [14] a vertical s tack of 3 nickel target disks plus one copper target disk, each approximately 1 cm th ick and 4.7 cm in radius, and interspersed with copper cooling disks. The tar get is cooled by forcing air up the vertical axis and through channels in the copper co oling disks. The stack of disks is enclosed in a titanium can that would contain targ et the material in case of failure, but the can is not in contact with the disks an d so is irrelevant for considerations of mechanical survivability. A 120 GeV prot on beam passes through a chord of the selected target disk, with an intensity [8] of 1 .6 to 2.1 ×1012protons per 1.6 µsec pulse, which is incident every 2.4seconds. The energy per pulse of the antiproton source, up to 40 kJ, is a lmost an order of magnitude below the 256 kJ muon collider specification of t able 2. Despite this, the round beam spot has a gaussian sigma at entry of only 140 mi crons [8], and this exposes the antiproton target to local energy deposits and temperature rises much larger than MARS predictions for the cupronickel band, which assume a much larger elliptical spot of dimensions σx= 1.5 mm, σy= 10 mm. As shown in table 1, the cupronickel band is predicted to sustain a maximum insta ntaneous energy de- position of approximately 70 J/g per proton pulse, compared to the 500-600 J/g maximum depositions at the the Fermilab antiproton source. The impressive peak temperature rise in the antiproton target is 1100oC over 1.6 µsec, to be compared to 150oC instantaneously and approximately 300oC over a fraction of a second for the band. While the comparison of the preceding paragraph is suggesti ve that the instan- taneous heat stresses on the cupronickel band might be accep table, there are several issues to be resolved before one has confidence in the benchma rking comparison with the Fermilab antiproton target. Issues include the effects o f the different target ge- ometries and the question of how closely the 1.6 µsec timescale for energy deposition in the antiproton target approximates the instantaneous en ergy deposition in the band. To further understand the shock heating stresses on the cupr onickel band, finite element computer simulations have been performed [15] usin g ANSYS, a commercial package that is very widely used for stress and thermal calcu lations. Energy den- sity distributions for the simulations were generated usin g the MARS [12] particle production Monte Carlo package. The very preliminary simul ations show periodic returns to maximum stress (i.e. “ringing”) but with little o r no amplification be- yond the initial stress. This is encouraging, and seems plau sible given that the oscillations occur in the band dimension that is much shorte r than the other two so 8the geometry is quasi-one dimensional and with little poten tial for focusing. Further ANSYS simulations of band target geometries are commencing [16], and these are intended to include explicit benchmarking simulations on t he Fermilab antiproton target. The other threat to the survival of the target band comes from exposure to ra- diation. This can change the material properties of target m aterials by transmuting some of the target atoms to new isotopes or elements and by cau sing dislocations in the atomic lattice. Face-centered cubic metal lattices s uch as copper and nickel are known from experience to survive radiation damage bette r than body-centered cubic metals like iron or tungsten. Target damage studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory and elsewhere [17] predict a risk of failure for c opper and nickel targets after integrated doses somewhere in the range 1021to 1022minimum ionizing par- ticles per square centimeter, which corresponds to approxi mately 0.3 – 3 GJ/g of deposited energy. It is straightforward to obtain a rough estimate of the integ rated doses on the cupronickel by noting that the parameters of tables 1 and 2 co rrespond to doses, along the centerline of the band and for an accelerator year o f 107seconds, that accumulate to: summed energy deposition ∼140 J/g×3 m/s 2π×2.5m×107s∼0.3 J/g,(1) where 140 J/g is the energy deposited per rotation and the sec ond term is the target rotation frequency. Since 0.3 GJ/g is the lower limit for pre dictions of target failure, the initial conclusion to be drawn is that it may well be accep table to replace the target band after each year’s running. More detailed studie s are obviously needed to check and refine this first simple estimate. To recap, this section has provided a first look at benchmarki ng the cupron- ickel band target to the Fermilab antiproton target and othe r existing data from operating targets. The two indications from these initial c omparisons are that: 1. the much greater temperature rises in the operating Fermi lab target give some initial confidence in the short-term survivability of the ta rget but the com- parison has not yet been made rigorous 2. the simple calculation of equation 1 suggests that potent ially damaging ra- diation doses would accumulate over an acceptably long time scale for the cupronickel band target, despite the 3.8 MW beam power, beca use the ra- diation dose is spread over the entire circumference of the b and rather than being concentrated in one region. More detailed studies are beginning to check and clarify the se very preliminary findings. 6 Technology Options and Parameter Optimizations The parameters of the cupronickel band target presented in r eference [1] and sec- tion 3 represent no more than an educated guess at a relativel y optimal configuration 9for the 4 MW proton driver parameters of table 2. The R&D requi red to verify and refine this design is just beginning and it is expected that ot her parameter values and design refinements will likely turn out to be better suite d for this and other proton driver scenarios. Entry-level neutrino factories have been discussed with pr oton driver powers of 1 MW or less, and this will clearly allow some relaxation of ta rget design parameters. At the other end of the scale, proton drivers for neutrino fac tories of up to 20 MW have also been discussed at CERN. In some neutrino factory sc enarios, the proton beam is partitioned into smaller bunches than is feasible fo r muon colliders and this will generally also allow for a relaxation of target paramet ers. Some examples of parameters that need to be optimized depend ing on the specific proton driver scenario are: 1. the beam spot size and the cross-sectional area of the band . These will tend to become larger for increasing proton pulse energy 2. the target circumference and rotation rate: these will bo th tend to increase with increasing average beam power; the first to increase the surface area available for cooling the target and the second to moderate t he localized target heating. These parameter values and the those of the proton driver wil l also determine the optimal technology decisions for several design options, i ncluding: 1. the cooling technology. Helium gas cooling might perhaps be technically sim- pler than water cooling but the latter can provide larger hea t transfer rates per unit area. Radiative cooling is a third possible option f or refractory target materials such as graphite [18], tantalum [3] or tungsten 2. the band drive and guidance. The optimal choice might depe nd on the level of frictional drag from eddy currents in the magnetic field of th e capture solenoid and this depends in turn on the target band cross section, the target material and the target rotation velocity. The Zenzimmer-type rolle rs presented in reference [1] can comfortably handle the several kilowatt f rictional drag for the cupronickel band and default parameter set. Smaller fri ctional loads would instead allow for more modest electromagnetic guidance and a linear electric drive, as suggested in reference [3] 3. the choice of target band material, as will now be discusse d further. Evaluations of several targets for pion yield and for heatin g and shock stresses were performed [13, 18] using MARS simulations. It should be noted that these comparisons between elements depended on target densities and on the specific targetry scenario used, so they provide only approximate gu idance. However, the trend in heating stress was clear, with the stresses best for low atomic number (Z) elements and becoming rapidly worse with increasing Z. T o balance this, pion yields were predicted to be lower for low-Z materials than fo r those with medium or high atomic number. Instead of a steady rise in yield, the y ield was found to plateau somewhere between Al (Z=13) and Cu (Z=29) (elements in between were 10not investigated) and then to remain constant to within the a ccuracy of the study all the way out to the high-Z elements tungsten (Z=74) and mer cury (Z=80). This comparative study of target elements, along with the ou tstanding track record of both copper and nickel as target materials, was par t of the basis for the choice of cupronickel as the target band material propos ed in reference [1], with nickel (Z=27) and copper (Z=28) both towards the low-Z end of the plateau in pion yield. It would clearly be helpful to repeat the yield study f or elements between Al and Cu to pin down the exact fall-off position of the yield pl ateau, especially since some of the elements in between and their alloys are kno wn to have excellent mechanical and thermal properties for targetry applicatio ns, particularly Ti (Z=22), V (Z=23), Cr (Z=24) and Mn (Z=25) [19, 20]. While initial studies suggest the suitability of these medi um-Z elements for a 4 MW proton driver for muon colliders, lower-Z elements suc h as graphite can always be considered as options to extend the rotating band d esign to larger safety margins or to even more demanding beam specifications. The pe nalty to be paid is that graphite, for example, appears to have [21] only about 2 /3 the pion yield of the elements on the yield plateau. Despite this, such bands migh t anyway be used in the same target station as uses medium-Z bands – either as insura nce against problems with the medium-Z band or as an entry-level band to be eventua lly replaced by one with a higher yield. 7 Conclusions and Outlook This paper has reviewed and enlarged on a previously propose d design [1] for a high power pion production target station based around a rotatin g cupronickel band tar- get. The design scenario is mechanically rather straightfo rward and can be readily extrapolated from, and benchmarked to, existing targets. I nitial computer simula- tions [1] have predicted relatively optimal pion yields and the initial comparisons, made in section 5, with the operating Fermilab antiproton ta rget suggest that the cupronickel band target parameters of [1] will survive the p roton beams for at least some of the neutrino factory and muon collider scenarios tha t are under discussion. More generally, it was argued in sections 2 and 6 that viable r otating band target designs almost certainly exist for any of the proton driver s cenarios that have been seriously discussed for either muon colliders or neutrino f actories. The question is one of design optimization rather than feasibility, and w hether the demands of target survivability force any significant compromises on t he pion yield or phase space density that can be supplied by the target. The evolutionary nature and relative simplicity of the targ et design and concept appears to make it compatible with a few-year R&D program to fi rst explore the options and parameter space and then, if all goes well, to refi ne and develop the design towards construction at a neutrino factory or muon co llider. Such an R&D program might develop something like this: •in 2000: A) Paper studies to further clarify the design options and is sues, including developing databases of target material propert ies, existing targets, past experimental targetry studies and contact informatio n on targetry ex- perts and contacts, B) stress simulations and optimization studies using AN- 11SYS or a similar finite element analysis package. C) beginnin g engineering studies on the target layout, mechanical issues and cooling options, D) de- velop a conceptual design for the beam dump, E) further yield optimization studies on target geometry and the band material, using MARS or similar particle production codes, F) further particle tracking st udies to explore the integration of the target design with the beam dump and captu re and phase rotation channels. •in 2001: More detailed design studies for specific scenarios. Detail ed assess- ments of, and comparisons with, other target options. •2002 and beyond: continuing design studies might lead to mechanical proto- typing if this is found to be necessary and to beam tests if the se are convenient and would add significantly to the existing pool of experimen tal knowledge. •by approximately 2004: ready to begin constructing a rotating band target for a neutrino factory or muon collider. The R&D issues for successive years have been spelled out in p rogressively less detail but will necessarily involve a ramp-up in manpower, b eginning from perhaps 2 full-time equivalent people in 2000. Such an R&D program lo oks to be of modest extent compared to the efforts required for the more exotic ta rgets needed for, e.g., neutron spallation sources. Indeed, the overall prog ram looks compatible with installing a rotating band target station at a neutrino fact ory or muon collider facility for potential operation as early as 2006 or 2007. 8 Acknowledgments Studies on the cupronickel band target design have been cond ucted in collaboration with R.J. Weggel, N.V. Mokhov and S.S. Moser. This work has al so benefitted from discussions and techical advice from G. Bunce and C. Pai . The organizers and secretariat of NUFACT99 are to be commended for a well-organ ized and stimulating workshop. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Depart ment of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-98CH10886. References [1] B.J. King, S.S. Moser, R.J. Weggel and N.V. Mokhov, “A Cup ronickel Rotat- ing Band Pion Production Target for Muon Colliders”, Proc. PAC’99 , BNL- 66236. [2] B.J. King, S.S. Moser, R.J. Weggel and N.V. Mokhov, paper in preparation. [3] Private communication with J.R.J. Bennett (RAL). [4] Alessi et al., “An R & D Program for Targetry and Capture at a Muon- Collider Source - A Proposal to the BNL AGS Division”. Now acc epted into 12the BNL experimental program as experiment E951, with spoke sperson Kirk T. McDonald (Princeton U.). [5] The web page for the Accelerator Production of Tritium (A PT) project is http://apt.lanl.gov/ . The APT target layout is illustrate d and the basic over- all design parameters are tabulated. [6] E. Reuter et al., “Mechanical Design and Development of a High Power Target System for the SLC Positron Source” IEEE PAC (1991). [7] Internal notes on the BNL g - 2 pion production target, cou rtesy G. Bunce. Private communications with G. Bunce and C. Pai (BNL). [8] S. O’Day et al., “New Target Results from the FNAL Antiproton Source”, Proc. IEEE 1993 PAC 4, 3096. [9] C. Ankenbrandt et al. (The Muon Collider Collaboration) , “Status of Muon Collider Research and Development and Future Plans”, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2, 081001 (1999). [10] R.J. Weggel, unpublished plots of magnet coil configura tion and on-axis mag- netic field profile. These plots can be viewed at http : //pubweb .bnl.gov/people /bking/target berkeley99 /sld010 .htm and http : //pubweb .bnl.gov/people /bking/target berkeley99 /sld011 .htm , respec- tively. [11] Olin Brass, http : //www.olinbrass .com/ [12] N.V Mokhov, “The MARS Code System User’s Guide, Version 13 (98)”, FERMILAB-FN-628 (Feb. 1998). [13] The µ+µ−Collider Collaboration, µ+µ−Collider Feasibility Study , BNL- 52503, FERMILAB-Conf-96/092, LBNL-38946 (July 1996); http://www.cap.bnl.gov/mumu/book.html [14] S. O’Day (FNAL) unpublished engineering drawing of the Fermilab antiproton source target, dated 1-31-94. [15] Private communications with S.S. Moser (St. Joseph’s C ollege, Indiana). [16] Private communications with C.J. Densham and R.J.R. Be nnett (RAL). [17] Private communications with N.V. Mokhov (FNAL). [18] “FNAL Feasibility Study on a Neutrino Source Based on a M uon Storage Ring”, report in preparation, http://www.fnal.gov/projects/muon collider/nu-factory/ . [19] “Conceptual Design of a 500 GeV e+e- Linear Collider wit h Integrated X-ray Laser Facility”. DESY 1997-048, ECFA 197-182 (1997). See table 3.4.4, p. 429 for the parameters of various titanium alloys that are ca ndidates for high power production targets. 13[20] An archive of material properties relevant to fusion re actors, assembled by the ARIES Fusion Power Plant Studies Team, can be found at http://aries.ucsd.edu/PROPS/props.html . [21] N.V. Mokhov, “Pi/Mu Yield and Power Dissipation for Car bon and Mercury Targets in 20-Tesla Solenoid with Matching Section”, Muon Collider Internal Note61, (1999). 14

arXiv:physics/0005008v1 [physics.acc-ph] 4 May 2000Parameter Sets for 10 TeV and 100 TeV Muon Colliders, and their Study at the HEMC’99 Workshop1 Bruce J. King Brookhaven National Laboratory email: bking@bnl.gov web page: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking Abstract. A focal point for the HEMC’99 workshop was the evaluation of s traw-man parameter sets for the acceleration and collider rings of mu on colliders at center of mass energies of 10 TeV and 100 TeV. These self-consistent parame ter sets are presented and discussed. The methods and assumptions used in their gen eration are described and motivations are given for the specific choices of paramet er values. The assessment of the parameter sets during the workshop is then reviewed an d the implications for the feasibility of many-TeV muon colliders are evaluated. F inally, a preview is given of plans for iterating on the parameter sets and, more genera lly, for future feasibility studies on many-TeV muon colliders. I INTRODUCTION Self-consistent example parameter sets for the accelerati on and collider ring pa- rameters of many-TeV muon colliders were an important focal point for the discus- sions at the HEMC’99 Workshop – “Studies on Colliders and Col lider Physics at the Highest Energies: Muon Colliders at 10 TeV to 100 TeV”, he ld at Montauk, NY from September 27-October 1, 1999. They served as straw-m an examples to be criticized, fleshed-out and improved upon by the accelerato r experts attending the workshop, and the physics-related parameters helped the ex perimental and theo- retical physicists at the workshop in their evaluations and comments on the physics potential of such colliders. Three acceleration and collider parameter sets were used at HEMC’99: one at a center-of-mass energy of 10 TeV (set A) and two at 100 TeV (set s B and C). The collider ring and accelerator parameters are presented in t ables 1 and 2, respectively. 1)To appear in Proc. HEMC’99 Workshop – Studies on Colliders an d Collider Physics at the Highest Energies: Muon Colliders at 10 TeV to 100 TeV; Montau k, NY, September 27-October 1, 1999, web page http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/he shop. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-98CH10886.For comparison, table 1 also includes the parameter ranges f or the lower energy muon colliders that have been studied by the Muon Collider Co llaboration (MCC). This paper describes the methods used to generate the parame ter sets, details the motivations and assumptions for the specific choices of para meters and summarizes the evaluations, conclusions and suggestions for the param eter sets that were given by the workshop participants. In more detail, the collider ring parameters are presented fi rst, in section II, since they were considered the more critical of the two for as sessing the feasibility of many-TeV muon colliders. They also determine the initial assumptions used for the acceleration parameters, which are then discussed in se ction III. The level of understanding advanced substantially during the workshop , and section IV goes over the issues and viewpoints raised during the workshop as well as referencing the more detailed studies that are included elsewhere in the se proceedings and dis- cussing their impact on our assessment of the parameter sets . Finally, the Outlook and Conclusions section, section V, summarizes the results discussed in the pre- ceding section in the more general context of what they imply for the feasibility of many-TeV muon colliders. This concluding section also di scusses the outlook for iterations and refinements on the parameter sets and, mor e generally, previews some plans for further studies on many-TeV muon colliders. II STRAW-MAN MUON COLLIDER RING PARAMETER SETS AT 10 TEV AND 100 TEV A Generation of the Parameter Sets The parameter sets in table 1 were generated through iterati ve runs of a stand- alone computer program, as has been described previously (2 ; 3). The most important physics parameter for a specified collide r energy is the lu- minosity, L. This is derived in terms of several input parameters accord ing to the formula (2): L[cm−2.s−1] = 2.11×1033×HB×(1−e−2tD[γτµ]) ×fb[s−1](N0[1012])2(ECoM[TeV])3 C[km] ×/parenleftBiggσθ[mr].δ[10−3] ǫ6N[10−12]/parenrightBigg2/3 , (1) where the input variables are the CoM energy (E CoM), the collider ring circumfer- ence (C), the beams’ fractional momentum spread ( δ) and 6-dimensional invariant emittance ( ǫ6N), the time until the beams are dumped (t D), the bunch repetition frequency (f b), the initial number of muons per bunch ( N0), and the beam diver- gence at the interaction point ( σθ). Units in equations throughout this paper are 2TABLE 1. Self-consistent collider ring parameter sets for many-TeV muon colliders. The pa- rameters are as evaluated in the HEMC’99 workshop with the ex ception of the neutrino radiation parameters, which have been updated to incorporate the impr oved estimates from reference (1). parameter set A B C center of mass energy, ECoM 0.1 to 3 TeV 10 TeV 100 TeV 100 TeV additional description MCC status report evol. extrap. evol. extrap. ultracold bea m collider physics parameters: luminosity, L[1035cm−2.s−1] 8×10−5→0.5 10 10 1000 /integraltext Ldt [fb−1/year] 0.08→540 10 000 10 000 1 .0×106 No. of µµ→ee events/det/year 650→10 000 8700 87 8700 No. of 100 GeV SM Higgs/year 4000→600 000 1 .4×1072.1×1072.1×109 CoM energy spread, σE/E [10−3] 0.02→1.1 0.42 0.080 0.071 collider ring parameters: circumference, C [km] 0.35→6.0 15 100 100 ave. bending B field [T] 3.0→5.2 7.0 10.5 10.5 beam parameters: (µ−or)µ+/bunch, N 0[1012] 2.0→4.0 3.0 0.80 0.19 (µ−or)µ+bunch rep. rate, f b[Hz] 15→30 27 7.9 65 6-dim. norm. emit., ǫ6N[10−12m3] 170→170 85 10 1 .0×10−3 ǫ6N[10−4m3.MeV/c3] 2.0→2.0 1.0 0.12 1 .2×10−5 P.S. density, N 0/ǫ6N[1022m−3] 1.2→2.4 3.5 8.0 19 000 x,y emit. (unnorm.) [ π.µm.mrad] 3.5→620 0.81 0.018 4 .4×10−4 x,y normalized emit. [ π.mm.mrad] 50→290 38 8.7 0.21 long. emittance [10−3eV.s] 0.81→24 21 47 8.1 fract. mom. spread, δ[10−3] 0.030→1.6 0.60 0.113 0.100 relativistic γfactor, E µ/mµ 473→14 200 47 300 473 000 473 000 time to beam dump, t D[γτµ] no dump no dump 1.0 1.0 effective turns/bunch 450→780 1040 1350 1350 ave. current [mA] 17→30 55 4.0 7.8 beam power [MW] 1.0→29 131 100 198 synch. rad. critical E [MeV] 5×10−7→8×10−40.012 1.75 1.75 synch. rad. E loss/turn [GeV] 7×10−9→3×10−40.017 25 25 synch. rad. power [MW] 1×10−7→0.010 0.91 99 195 beam + synch. power [MW] 1.0→29 130 200 390 power density into magnet liner [kW/m] 1.0→1.7 4.3 1.2 2.4 interaction point parameters: spot size, σx,y[µm] 3.3→290 1.3 0.21 0.015 bunch length, σz[mm] 3.0→140 2.2 2.5 0.49 β∗ x,y[mm] 3.0→140 2.1 2.5 0.49 ang. divergence, σθ[mrad] 1.1→2.1 0.63 0.086 0.030 ip compensation factor: N 0/N0,eff. 1 1 1 10 beam-beam tune disruption, ∆ ν 0.015→0.051 0.085 0.100 0.100 pinch enhancement factor, H B 1.00→1.01 1.08 1.11 1.11 beamstrahlung frac. E loss/collision negligible 6 .8×10−81.5×10−69.0×10−7 final focus lattice parameters: max. poletip field of quads., B 5σ[T] 6→12 15 20 20 max. full aper. of quad., A ±5σ[cm] 14→24 22 19 6.6 quad. gradient, 2B 5σ/A±5σ[T/m] 50→90 140 210 610 βmax[km] 1.5→150 580 19 000 64 000 ff demag., M≡/radicalbig βmax/β∗ 220→7100 17 000 89 000 360 000 chrom. quality factor, Q≡M·δ 0.007→11 10 10 45 neutrino radiation parameters: collider reference depth, D[m] 10→300 100 100 100 ave. rad. dose in plane [mSv/yr] 2×10−5→0.02 2.3 10 20 str. sec. len. for 10x ave. rad. [m] 1.3→2.2 1.1 1.0 4.2 νbeam distance to surface [km] 11→62 36 36 36 νbeam radius at surface [m] 4.4→24 0.8 0.08 0.08 3given in square brackets. (The time-to-dump, tD, is given in units of the boosted muon lifetime, γτµ.) This formula uses the standard assumption from the Muon Collider Collaboration that the ratio of transverse to long itudinal emittances can be manipulated freely in the muon cooling channel to maximiz e the luminosity for a given ǫ6N. The pinch enhancement factor, H B, is very close to unity (see table 1), and the numerical coefficient in equation 1 includes a geometr ic correction factor of 0.76 for the non-zero bunch length, σz=β∗(the “hourglass effect”) . In practice, the muon beam power and current are limiting par ameters for en- ergy frontier muon colliders, so the parameters are actuall y chosen to optimize the “specific luminosity”: l≡L fb×N0. (2) The luminosity is then determined from the choice of beam cur rent that corresponds to the highest plausible beam powers. Several further parameters in table 1 have been derived from the input parameters that determine the luminosity. These include, for example, the beam-beam tune disruption parameter, ∆ ν. Other output parameters require additional modeling assumptions and/or further input parameters (2; 3). Exampl es include some of the output parameters for the final focus; these require both the input of a reference pole-tip magnetic field for the final focus quadrupoles (B 5σ) and a much simplified model for the final focus magnet lattice that is a linearized e xtrapolation from existing final focus lattice designs for lower energy muon co lliders. The physics parameters in table 1 include two examples of eve nt sample sizes. As is discussed in references (4; 5) these give an indication of the physics potential cor- responding to the specified luminosity and energy. Briefly, t he number of µµ→ee events gives a benchmark estimate of the discovery potentia l for elementary parti- cles at the full CoM energy of the collider, while the product ion of hypothesized 100 GeV Higgs particles indicates roughly how the colliders mig ht perform in studying physics at a lower energy scale. B Optimization of the 10 TeV and 100 TeV Parameter Sets The Initial Choice of Energies The two energies for the parameter sets, E CoM= 10 TeV and 100 TeV, were chosen because they bracket that energy decade. The 10 TeV lo wer limit was chosen to be well above the highest energy that had been studi ed in detail, namely, ECoM= 4 TeV for the Snowmass’96 workshop (6). Further, the neutri no radiation for very high luminosity µ+µ−colliders at 10 TeV and above is high enough to rule out siting them at an existing laboratory, as is covered elsewhere in these 4proceedings (1). This necessitates a fresh outlook for the d esign optimization of theµ+µ−colliders that is free from site-specific preconceptions in volving existing laboratories, which was considered a good thing. The choice of the upper energy limit was more technically con strained. For the 100 TeV parameter sets, the synchrotron radiation power had risen to become almost identical to the beam power, signaling a clear upper b ound for the feasibility of circular µ+µ−colliders. To preview later discussion, it is noted that our understand ing of the constraints on high energy muon colliders advanced during the workshop, as will be covered in section IV. An additional constraint on the maximum possi ble energies for circular muon colliders was discovered (7), due to beam heat ing arising from the quantum mechanical nature of the synchrotron radiation. On the other hand, the future prospects of many-TeV muon colliders were given a boo st when the possible potential for linear colliders at even higher energies was u ncovered (8). Balancing Luminosity against Technical Difficulty After deciding on the collision energies, it was then decide d that the 10 TeV (set A) and the first of the 100 TeV parameter sets (set B) shoul d assume only evolutionary changes in technology from the base-line para meters that have been previously posited for lower energy colliders (9). For exam ple, the assumed 6- dimensional emittances are factors of 3.5 (10 TeV) or 50 (100 TeV) smaller than the value 170 ×10−12m3that is normally used in Muon Collider Collaboration scenarios for first generation muon colliders. The smaller e mittances assume that the performance of the muon cooling channel will be progress ively improved through further design optimization, stronger magnets, higher gra dient rf cavities and other technological advancements and innovations. The second parameter set at 100 TeV (i.e., set C) encouraged s tudy on some of the possibilities for using exotic technologies to improve the potential performance of future many-TeV µ+µ−colliders. The additional assumed advances increased the luminosity by two orders of magnitude over the evolution ary parameter set at 100 TeV, to what would be a very impressive 1 ×1038cm−2.s−1. (The luminosity should ideally rise as E CoM2, as is explained in reference (5).) The hypothesized technical advances included: 1. exotic cooling, to obtain a phase space density that is a fu rther 3 orders of magnitude larger than the assumption for the evolutionary p arameter set at 100 TeV 2. charge compensation at the interaction point (ip), to red uce the effective charge by a factor of 10. This assumption led rather directly to a corre- sponding increase in the luminosity by about a factor of 10. 3. more aggressive final focus parameters were included to al low for potential 5improvements in the final focus design, perhaps using exotic focusing tech- nologies 4. the beam power was almost doubled from the evolutionary pa rameter set (B), to “top up” the luminosity to 1 ×1038cm−2.s−1. Final Focus Constraints The final focus design may well present the most difficult desig n challenges that are relatively specific to high energy muon colliders. (This is to be contrasted with the muon cooling channel, which is a formidable challenge fo r all muon colliders.) References (2) and (3) have previously addressed the genera l design constraints and issues for final focus designs at many-TeV muon colliders. To re-cap the discussion of references (2) and (3), higher en ergies demand pro- gressively stronger focusing to generate the smaller spot s izes needed to increase the luminosity. Two simply defined parameters were used as be nchmarks to obtain final focus specifications that might provide plausible star ting assumptions for first attempts at magnet lattice designs. Firstly, an overall bea m demagnification pa- rameter is defined (2) in terms of one of the Courant-Snyder la ttice parameters, β, as M≡/radicalBigg βmax β∗. (3) This is a dimensionless parameter that gauges the strength o f the focusing. The size ofMshould be closely correlated with fractional tolerances in magnet uniformity, residual chromaticity, etc., where the chromaticity is a me asure of the change in response of the final focus to off-momentum particles. Second ly, a high residual chromaticity can be compensated for by decreasing the fract ional momentum spread of the beams, δ. This suggests that another measure of the final focus difficul ty might come from the product of the demagnification and moment um spread, q≡Mδ, (4) where qhas been referred to (2) as the “chromaticity quality factor ”. In generating the parameter sets, the values of Mandqwere compared to those for existing e+e−andµ+µ−final focus designs, as was discussed in references (2; 3). In practice, slightly more attention was paid to qthan to Min obtaining the final parameters. It can be seen from table 1 that the two “evolutio nary” parameter sets, A and B, were constrained to the value q= 10, which is very similar to the calculated value, q= 11, for the final focus lattice design of the 3 TeV µ+µ−collider in reference (9). A more aggressive value, q= 45, was allowed for in the second parameter set at 100 TeV. It is noted that the parameter sets at these high energies are always limited by ∆νand it is useful and straightforward to rewrite equations 1 a nd 2 in the form: 6l∝∆ν β∗, (5) which has no explicit dependence on emittance or bunch size f or a given energy. The experience with optimizing the parameter sets was that this independence is true as an approximation only (3); residual dependences on limit ing magnet apertures etc. meant that, in practice, it was almost always possible t o slightly improve the specific luminosity by re-optimizing to parameter sets w ith smaller assumed emittances. A value of ∆ ν= 0.10 was assumed for all parameter sets. This was estimated by interpolating the results from a beam tracking study desc ribed in reference (6). Equation 5 and the discussion that follows indicate that the luminosity will scale approximately linearly with different assumed values for ∆ ν. Constraints on Energy Spread from Beamstrahlung The “chromaticity quality factor” figure of merit, equation 4, favors decreasing the fractional momentum spread, δ, in order to ease the difficulty of the final focus, and this strategy was found to be effective in optimizing the l uminosity for all three parameter sets. By the E CoM= 100 TeV energy scale, however, the value of δwas found (3) to be limited from below by the rapidly rising beams trahlung at collision. This occurred even though the fractional beamstrahlung ene rgy loss, (∆ E)brem, remained at the level of parts-per-million per beam crossin g, i.e., much less than the percent level expected at TeV-scale linear e+e−colliders. The difference is the need for multiple passes at µ+µ−colliders, which compounds the sensitivity to beamstrahlung losses. The average beamstrahlung energy losses can be replaced by r f acceleration, of course. However, the particle-by-particle variations wil l contribute to the spread in the beam momentum, and any such contributions from beamst rahlung must be limited to somewhat below the original momentum spread of the beam. The residual contributions to the beam energy spread should ris e as the square root of the number of passes, since they will be statistically indep endent from turn to turn. Therefore, an appropriate criterion that was chosen to set l ower limits on δis: (∆E)brem×/radicalBig neff turn δ<∼1, (6) where the effective (i.e. luminosity-weighted) number of tu rns,neff turn, has values in the range neff turn≃1000. The evolutionary (B) and ultra-cool (C) parameter set s at E CoM= 100 TeV had chosen values of 0.49 and 0.33 for the left hand si de of equation 6, respectively. As an aside, it is noted that reference (3) had suggested foll owing the lead of proposed TeV-scale e+e−colliders by considering the option of using flat, rather than round, beam spots at the ip in order to reduce the beamstr ahlung. This was 7tried, but all attempts led to disappointing luminosities a nd so round beam spots were retained for the parameter sets. III STRAW-MAN ACCELERATION PARAMETERS TABLE 2. Straw-man acceleration parameter sets for high energy muon colliders. The word “net” in the column “net E rf” refers to the net energy gain per turn in the rf cavities afte r approximately subtracting synchrotron radiation losses f rom the 50 GeV and 250 GeV energy gains in the first and second recirculators, respectively. T he parameter sets NA f, NB fand NC f are the numbers of muons per bunch at the exit of each FFAG corr esponding to each of the three straw-man muon collider ring scenarios in table 1. Ei EfEf Eicircum. B avenet E rf# turns fdecay NA f NB f NC f [TeV] [TeV] [km] [T] [GeV] % [1012] [1012] [1012] 0.5 3.35 1.038 0.247 0.50 1.25 2.5 15 1.7 50 15 4.3% 3.21 0.993 0.236 1.25 2.50 2.0 15 3.5 50 25 3.3% 3.10 0.961 0.229 2.50 3.50 1.40 15 4.9 50 20 1.6% 3.05 0.945 0.225 3.50 4.55 1.30 15 6.4 50 21 1.3% 3.01 0.933 0.222 4.55 5.00 1.10 15 7.0 50 9 0.5% 3.00 0.929 0.221 5.0 12.5 2.5 100 2.6 250 30 5.7% 0.876 0.208 12.5 25.0 2.0 100 5.2 249 50 4.4% 0.838 0.199 25.0 35.0 1.40 100 7.3 246 41 2.2% 0.820 0.195 35.0 45.5 1.30 100 9.5 238 44 1.8% 0.805 0.192 45.5 50.0 1.10 100 10.5 229 20 0.7% 0.800 0.190 A Introduction Table 2 gives straw-man acceleration scenarios that reprod uce the final energy and bunch charge for each of the three straw-man muon collide r ring scenarios given in table 1, labeled as A) 10 TeV with 1036luminosity, B) 100 TeV with 1036 luminosity and C) 100 TeV with 1038luminosity. The layout of each of the two recirculating complexes for table 2 is sketched schematica lly in figure 1. The acceleration scenarios of table 2 and figure 1 will be desc ribed in subsec- tion IIID. For now, we note that the table contains only a mini mal amount of information – much less than was provided for the collider ri ng – and, in practice, the acceleration parameters were much less critical than th e collider ring parameters for determining the technical feasibility or otherwise of t he collider scenarios. This viewpoint is supported by a much more detailed and knowledge able acceleration scenario that is presented elsewhere in these proceedings ( 10). Aside from the technical considerations, the acceleration is expected to dominate the cost of the colliders so its cost optimization will be ver y important and this 8FIGURE 1. Accelerator layout for the acceleration scenario of table 2 . The layout is schematic and is certainly not drawn to scale. A single tunnel contains 5 rings of FFAG arcs. All the arcs pass through the same rf cavities, shown here in 2 linacs on op posite sides of the tunnel. The collider ring is also shown in the same tunnel, indicating th at this accelerator complex brings the beam up to collision energy, i.e., this could be the 0.5-5 TeV ring for the 10 TeV collider (parameter set A) or the 5-50 TeV ring for the 100 TeV collider s (sets B and C). Transfer lines between the rings are not shown. As an aside, 2 detectors are s hown in the collider storage ring, although this was not assumed in the workshop. This would dou ble the luminosity but would complicate the design of the storage ring. was the main design criterion for the straw-man scenarios pr esented in table 2. To minimize the cost, the scenarios use configurations of rec irculating linacs with “fixed field alternating gradient” (FFAG) magnet lattices. The rest of this section is organized as follows. A very simpl istic and non- technical introduction to FFAGs will be given in the next sub section. Some pre- liminaries on calculating decay losses during acceleratio n occupy the subsection after that before, in subsection IIID, returning to describ e the motivation for the parameter choices in table 2. B FFAG Recirculating Arcs The amount of expensive rf acceleration can be reduced many- fold relative to linear accelerators by bending the muons around for many pas ses through the same length of linac. The onus then shifts to minimizing the c ost of the magnets in the recirculating arcs. In turn, it is then desirable that each of the arcs be able to accept a wide range of momenta so it can be reusable for many traverses. The most promising option for doing this appears to lie in a class of either quadrupole- 9FIGURE 2. A very schematic illustration of the FFAG concept. Each tria ngle signifies a bending magnet with a non-uniform magnetic field. The acute point of e ach triangle signifies the direction of the bending magnetic field and the thickness at any radius s ignifies the magnetic field strength in this direction rather than the spatial extent of the magne t. (More generally, the increase in the field gradient will not be linear.) If the magnet spacin gs and magnetic field parameters are appropriate then the non-uniform bending fields automat ically provide alternating gradient focusing in both transverse planes. loaded or combined function magnet lattices that are referr ed to as “fixed focus, alternating gradient” or “FFAG” lattices. Fast-ramping sy nchrotrons may also be considered (6; 9) but steady-state operation of FFAGs appea rs likely to be cheaper and might well be more reliable. Figure 2 gives a very conceptual illustration of the basic id ea of FFAGs. It can be seen that the alternating sign of the bending field results in net bending in the direction of the stronger dipoles a provides the scalloped b eam trajectories that are characteristic of FFAGs. Further out trajectories see a progressively stronger average bending field and so are appropriate for transportin g larger momenta in proportion to the average magnetic field strength. FFAGs were first considered back in the 1950’s (11) but, presu mably, were not developed further at that time because the simpler alternat ive of slowly ramping synchrotrons was adequate for the acceleration of stable pa rticles. Impressively, FFAG lattices have now been designed that transport as much a s factors of 5 to 10 in muon momentum, although such extreme designs require ver y large apertures and the peak magnetic fields are several times the average ben ding field. Some initial design studies for more practical FFAG lattices are presented elsewhere in these proceedings (12; 13). Perhaps the biggest technical problem with all FFAG scenari os is the difficulty in maintaining turn-by-turn an appropriate phase relationsh ip with the rf acceleration, since the path lengths of the muon orbits within the FFAG latt ice get progressively larger with increasing energy – as is conceptually illustra ted in figure 2. It is a 10nice feature of many-TeV colliders that these problems beco me progressively less at higher energies because the increasing revolution perio d through the arcs gives more time for adjustments between passes through the linac. C Rf Acceleration and Decay Losses The amount of radio-frequency (rf) acceleration per turn wi ll be determined by a trade-off between minimizing the expense and the tunnel len gth occupied by rf (favors less rf) and minimizing the number of turns and the de cay losses (favors more rf). A formula relating the decay losses to the rf and recirculato r parameters can be derived directly from the decay equation for the change in th e number of muons, N, with distance, x: −1 NdN dx=1 βγcτ, (7) where cis the speed of light, the scaled muon velocity is essentiall y unity for the muon energies under consideration, β= 1, γ≡Eµ mµc2is the conventional relativistic gamma factor and the muon mass and its lifetime ,τ, are such that mc2 cτ= 0.1604 GeV .km−1. It follows easily that muon decay losses lead to ratios of ini tial to final bunch populations,Ni Nf, that are related to the recirculator tunnel lengths in unit s of kilometers, Lj[km], the number of GeV per turn of rf acceleration, Ej rf[GeV], and the ratio of final to initial energies in the recirculator,Ej i Ej f, through ln/parenleftbiggNf Ni/parenrightbigg = 0.1604/summationdisplay j=1,NLj[km] Ej rf[GeV]ln Ej i Ej f , (8) where j= 1, Nis the index for the jthof N recirculators. Equation 8 has made the approximation of averaging the acceleration to an assum ed constant gradient over the length of the recirculator rather than the real situ ation where it will be concentrated in one or more rf linacs placed around the recir culator. This should introduce only small fractional errors in the calculated pa rticle losses for the pa- rameters given in table 2. D Optimization of the Straw-man Acceleration Scenario The straw-man acceleration scenario presented in table 2 st arts at 500 GeV, working on the assumption that the acceleration to this ener gy range has already been developed and used for a previous TeV-scale µ+µ−collider. The acceleration scenario for the E CoM= 10 TeV collider (set A) then needs to provide exactly one 11decade of energy gain, accelerating the beams from 0.5 TeV up to their collision energy of 5 TeV. It economizes on expensive rf acceleration b y utilizing only a relatively modest 50 GV of rf cavities. The E CoM= 100 TeV collider scenarios start with the E CoM= 10 TeV accelera- tion scenario and add a further decade of acceleration to rai se the beam energies to 50 TeV. A further 250 GV of rf cavities are utilized, which i s, for example, much less rf than is required for the next generation of e+e−colliders and so should be easily compatible with the budget constraints on a 100 TeV co llider. In more detail, it can be seen from table 2 that the recirculat ing accelerator to 50 TeV is essentially a scaled copy of that to 5 TeV. Both recir culators use 5 rings of FFAG arcs and the fractional momentum increment in each of the 5 rings is the same between the first and second recirculator. As one diff erence, the average bending fields, B ave, in the second recirculator are assumed to be a factor of 1.5 times higher than in the first. Figure 1 is a schematic diagram for a possible layout of eithe r of the two recir- culators. As a specific suggestion of this layout, it assumes the 5 FFAG rings to be housed in the same tunnel. Further, this tunnel is assumed to be the collider tun- nel, i.e., the 5+5 TeV collider for the first recirculator and the 50+50 TeV collider for the second. The obvious motivation for the layout of figure 1 is to minimiz e the complexity and tunnel expense of the scenario. However, requiring all 5 FFAG rings in a recir- culator to have the same radius as the collider ring has the ob vious consequences of fixing the FFAG ring radii and of constraining the average ben ding magnetic fields in each ring according to the ranges of transported momenta i n that ring. Table 2 gives a specific scenario for doing this. The design of the later FFAG rings in each recirculator is cle arly more constrained than those for the earlier rings because the average bending field must be closer to the (assumed high) average bending field of the collider ri ng. This is dealt with in table 2 by constraining the momentum swing to become progr essively smaller for the later rings in the recirculators. Assumed energy ran ges covered by the arcs range from a factor of 2.5 increase – for the lowest energy arc s in each recirculator – down to 10% energy gain for the highest energy arcs in each re circulator. These are really no more than guesses since, for example, the magne t apertures and ratios of peak-to-average magnetic fields required for this scenar io are unknown. Assumed average gradients for superconducting rf of 25 MV/m , as is assumed for the proposed TESLA e+e−collider, correspond to total rf lengths of 2 km (10 km) for the 10 TeV (100 TeV) colliders, which is 13.3% (10.0%) of the collider ring circumference. The example schematic layout of figure 1 show s the rf to be split equally between the two straight sections of tunnel on the op posing sides of the “race-track” collider ring, although this choice was somew hat arbitrary. Decay losses were calculated according to equation 8. Non-d ecay losses were neglected. Synchrotron radiation energy losses – which ran ge up to about 10% per turn at 50 TeV – have been included in a simple approximate man ner. Table 2 shows the overall decay losses to be acceptably low, at 10.5% and 13 .9% respectively, for 12each of the two decades of energy gain. Having detailed the scenario, it should again be emphasized that the overall sce- nario, together with its specific choices and assumptions, w as intended to do no more than provide the seed for more credible design studies f rom the accelerator physicists attending this workshop. Nothing but the qualit ative assumptions of the scenario should be considered at all, and even these only at t he reader’s discretion. Of course, none of the specific numerical assumptions should be taken at all se- riously, beyond perhaps obtaining a rough qualitative feel for such parameters as the amount of rf acceleration required and the magnitudes fo r the fractional decay losses. Bearing the preceding paragraph in mind, we conclude this se ction by again referring the reader to the vastly more competent and detail ed acceleration studies that emerged from the workshop: the overall acceleration sc enarios of reference (10) and the FFAG design studies in references (12) and (13). IV ASSESSMENT OF THE MUON COLLIDER PARAMETER SETS AT HEMC’99 TABLE 3. An assessment of the feasibility of high energy collider par ameter sets, incorporat- ing the advances in understanding from the HEMC’99 workshop . See text for details. parameter set A B C center of mass energy, ECoM 10 TeV 100 TeV 100 TeV additional description evol. extrap. evol. extrap. ultracold beam, etc. Luminosity for Physics: excellent fair excellent Technology: acceleration probably OK OK OK detector backgrounds probably OK probably OK probably OK beam cooling probably OK probably OK problematic synch. radiation probably OK borderline NOT FEASIBLE final focus challenging problematic problematic overall technology: challenging problematic NOT FEASIBLE Cost: challenging problematic problematic neutrino rad./siting dedicated new site same site same site OVERALL challenging problematic NOT FEASIBLE This section reviews the studies and assessments at HEMC’99 of the collider ring and acceleration parameter sets of tables 1 and 2. It will con centrate on the muon collider design issues arising out of the parameter sets. Th e reader is also referred 13to the summary paper by Willis (14) for a more general overvie w of the findings of the workshop. Table 3 summarizes the status of the acceleration and collid er parameter sets after review at the workshop. As an important piece of contex tual information, the assessment of parameter set A (10 TeV), assumes that a TeV-sc ale muon collider has already been built and successfully operated and the par ameter set in each successive column assumes that the collider of the precedin g column has already been built. The following subsections have been grouped according to su bject areas that follow fairly closely, but not exactly, the rows of table 3: o n luminosity, acceleration, detectors, cooling, synchrotron radiation, final focus des ign and beam instabilities. A more general outlook and list of conclusions based on these observations will be deferred to the final section, section V. A Assessment of Luminosities for Physics The luminosity requirements for µ+µ−colliders are discussed in some detail else- where in these proceedings (5). Ideally, collider luminosi ties should rise as E CoM2 and it is seen that, indeed, the luminosities for all three pa rameter sets in table 1 are higher than for any existing or (to the author’s knowledg e) other proposed collider. Both parameter sets A and C have excellent luminosities, eve n considering their high energies, while the luminosity of parameter set B was st ill considered to be “fair” for a 100 TeV lepton collider. (See reference (5) for f urther discussion.) B Assessment of the Acceleration Scenario Studies at HEMC’99 focused more on the collider ring paramet er sets of table 1 than on the acceleration scenario of table 2. The accelerati on scenario was con- sidered critical mostly to the extent that it would be expect ed to be the biggest single component of the overall cost of the collider. Unfort unately, the cost of the FFAG magnets was not able to be explicitly addressed in any de tail due to the newness and developing nature of FFAG scenarios (12; 13) for muon colliders. A rather indirect source for some optimism on the acceleratio n costs could come from any assumed correlation with some relatively favorable cos t estimates for the col- lider ring magnets, by Harrison (15), who roughly assessed t he cost for the collider magnets for the 10 TeV scenario (set A) to be perhaps of order 4 00 million dollars. Technically, muon acceleration tends to get easier at highe r energies due to the increasing muon lifetime, smaller beam sizes and lower circ ulation frequencies in re- circulating linacs. Hence, the technical feasibility of ac celeration up to the energies in the table is automatically established to a large extent b y the assumed previous success of the acceleration at a TeV-scale µ+µ−collider. As a minor caveat to this, Harrison pointed out the increased load due to synchro tron radiation in the 14FFAGs. However, the collider ring magnets will need to handl e the synchrotron ra- diation load for many times more turns than the FFAG arcs, so e ven this technical difficulty is concentrated more in the collider ring than the a ccelerating lattice. Berg (10) pointed out that slightly increased technical diffi culties might instead be expected for the low energy end of the acceleration for parameter sets A and, especially, B. This could result from the higher specified va lues for the longitudinal emittance in the many-TeV parameter sets: table 1 shows the l ongitudinal emit- tances for these parameter sets to be, respectively, simila r to, and about twice as large as, the longitudinal emittance for the 3 TeV parameter set of reference (9). C Detector Backgrounds All muon collider detectors face challenging backgrounds r esulting from the elec- tron daughters of decaying muons near the interaction point . However, the amount of electromagnetic “junk” entering the detector is relativ ely independent of the col- lider energy since the power density of deposited electroma gnetic energy depends primarily on the beam current rather than the beam energy. (F or confirmation of this statement, see the values in the “power density into m agnet liner” row of table 1.) Hence, such backgrounds are expected to be managea ble for these many- TeV parameter sets under the stated assumption that the prob lem has already been solved at TeV-scale collider detectors. (A specific str ategy for handling these backgrounds that was developed at the workshop is described in reference (16) of these proceedings.) Muons entering the side of the detector, either from beam hal o or Bethe-Heitler µ+µ−pair production, are the one background that is expected to e volve markedly with energy. As muons become more relativistic they become l ess and less like minimum-ionizing particles and deposit larger amounts of e nergy “catastrophically” in, mainly, electromagnetic showers. This issue was not add ressed at the workshop and it deserves further study. D Beam Cooling Parameter sets A and B assume only evolutionary improvement s in the ionization cooling performance over that assumed (but far from demonst rated (9)!) for TeV- scale colliders so, by definition, the beam cooling should pr obably be OK if following on from the TeV-scale collider. Parameter set C is very differ ent, assuming that some form of exotic cooling will be able to increase the phase space density of the muon beams by three orders of magnitude from that assumed for parameter set B. Such ultra-cold muon beams are still looking plausible but h ave not yet pro- gressed beyond that. The most promising of the exotic coolin g methods is optical stochastic cooling (17). This method clearly has formidabl e technical challenges but no obvious show-stoppers. Other, very low energy, cooli ng methods were also presented at the workshop (18; 19). There is some concern tha t any cooling method 15using non-relativistic muons (i.e. with scaled velocity β≪1) may well not be fea- sible for preparing the high-charge muon bunches needed for colliders, due to space charge limitations. It is noted that parameter set C provides a specific example of a general feature for ultra-cold muon beams. Since the collisions at many-TeV colliders would nor- mally be tune-shift limited anyway, it is likely that improv ed cooling would also require ip compensation to substantially benefit the lumino sity. We now discuss yet another barrier to the use of ultra-cold beams, at least a t very high energies, from synchrotron radiation. E Synchrotron Radiation It has already been noted that the synchrotron radiation pow er in the 100 TeV colliders is already comparable to the beam power. During th e workshop, Telnov (7) raised what might possibly be a stronger constraint from syn chrotron radiation on the energy reach of circular muon colliders, namely, the q uantum nature of synchrotron radiation may lead to heating, rather than damp ing, of the horizontal beam emittance if the beam energy is high enough and the emitt ance is already very small. Telnov’s observation clearly spells the end of parameter se t C, with its ultra-cold beam at E CoM= 100 TeV. The other parameter set at 100 TeV (set B) is also borderline, with an initial horizontal emittance that is la rger by a factor of five (7) than the equilibrium emittance due to this effect, as calcula ted by Telnov using a simple approximate model. The most likely possible loop-hole for parameter set B is tha t the heating effect is reduced for a very strongly focusing collider lattice. Mo re specifically, Telnov’s equation 2 shows the equilibrium emittance to be proportion al to the average of the “H-function” around the collider ring, where H∝β3 ρ2, (9) forβthe standard Courant-Snyder parameter and ρthe collider ring’s radius. (Stronger focusing corresponds to smaller βvalues around the ring.) To consider adjustments to parameter set B, equation 9 sugge sts that 100 TeV colliders with the emittances expected from ionization coo ling still look to be fea- sible by increasing the ring radius, ρ, by, for example, a factor of two. This would lower both the equilibrium emittance by a factor of four and t he radiated energy per turn by a factor of two, which is substantial compensation fo r halving the number of collisions per bunch. A much more dramatic approach to beating the energy limits fr om synchrotron radiation has come from Zimmermann (8), in the form of single pass linear µ+µ− colliders. Example parameter sets are included in Zimmerma nn’s paper, and are commented on in more detail elsewhere in these proceedings ( 5). 16F Final Focus Design The final focus design extrapolations discussed in section I I seemed to work well for the 10 TeV parameter set A. A magnet layout for the final foc us from John- stone (20) closely reproduced the predicted βmaxin table 1. Further, the lattice design experts at the workshop seemed to appreciate the extr emely challenging nature of the 10 TeV final focus parameters without everybody actually condemn- ing them as being clearly unrealistic, i.e., an appropriate level of difficulty for a workshop of this nature! See reference (8) for more detailed studies and comments. The 100 TeV parameter sets were less fortunate. Even the “evo lutionary” param- eter set B was immediately dismissed by the lattice experts a s being incompatible with any final focus lattice designs using conventional magn ets. It will be very useful to get further feedback on what exactly broke down in t he simplistic energy extrapolation that was described in section IIA. Hopefully , such feedback can then be used to obtain a better parameterization of the energy evo lution in the final focus parameters. A more realistic and better established p arameterization could then be used to predict the luminosity scaling with energy th at might be expected using conventional final focus technologies. Finally, two exotic final focus options were discussed that m ight go beyond con- ventional magnet designs: “dynamic focusing” (using auxil iary beams to focus the colliding beams) and plasma focusing. Discouragingly, bot h options looked much less plausible than when considered for single pass e+e−colliders, due to both the need for multiple passes and the larger bunch currents assum ed for µ+µ−collider parameters. Also disappointing are the obstacles to beam co mpensation at colli- sion (as was assumed in parameter set C), which call into ques tion the possibility of being able to do this – see reference (21) for discussion on this topic. G Beam Instabilities in the Collider Ring Papers by Keil (22) and Zimmermann (8) provide studies on bea m instabilities. Keil provides a systematic assessment of the classes of inst abilities, including pa- rameter comparisons with the LHC collider ring. Zimmermann ’s tracking studies demonstrated that even circulating the beams for a single tu rn should not be taken for granted, let alone for of order 1000 turns over the lifeti me of the muons. As a connection to the physics capabilities of the collider r ing that needs to be borne in mind, the common assumption (9) of collider rings th at are isochronous is disfavored for retaining the beam polarization. (See also r eference (23) for a discus- sion on the importance of polarization.) As a rough hand-wav ing explanation, the rate of polarization precession while circulating in the co llider ring is proportional to the muon’s energy. It is intuitively clear that the polari zation will decay away more slowly if the energies of all the particles are allowed t o slosh around the beam average energy – sometimes gaining in polarization precess ion (higher energy) over the bunch average precession and sometimes losing (lower en ergy than the bunch 17average). This is what happens in a collider ring with longit udinal focusing as opposed to isochronous rings. The same argument also favors small beam energy spreads. V OUTLOOK AND CONCLUSIONS The preceding section has reviewed the insights from HEMC’9 9 on the parameter sets of tables 1 and 2. More generally than this, HEMC’99 has p rovided the first speculative insights into (i) the ultimate physics potenti al for future colliders at the high energy frontier and (ii) the potential challenges to re aching very high energies with muon colliders. A personal interpretation of the works hop’s findings through the energy decades is: •muon colliders to the TeV scale: (added for completeness – these energies were not discussed in detail at the workshop) beam cooling is the dominant technical challenge. Other major challenges are the final fo cus region, back- grounds in the detector, cost-efficient acceleration and bea m stability through- out the cooling, acceleration and storage in the collider ri ng. Neutrino radia- tion will impose significant design constraints and the beam currents may be well below those for the straw-man parameters in reference ( 9) (i.e. 6 ×1020 muons/sign/year in collision). •to advance to the 10 TeV scale: neutrino radiation will probably dictate a new site. The final focus region of the collider and magnet co st reduction for acceleration may be the other major technical design iss ues. •to advance to the 100 TeV scale: major breakthroughs are needed in magnet costs and in the final focus region. •to advance to the 1 PeV scale and beyond: this is not absolutely ruled out in the far distant future using a linac and many technolog ical break- throughs, as illustrated by the parameter set in reference ( 8) and discussed further in reference (5). It would certainly be very valuable to follow up on the unders tandings gained at this workshop. As a small first step, modified parameter set s for many-TeV muon colliders are being generated (24) that take into accou nt the insights gained at HEMC’99. As a refinement to make interpolations easier, a p arameter set at the intermediate center-of-mass energy of 30 TeV will be includ ed. More substantially, there is need for a new study and worksho p. Preferably, this should include all three of the main accelerator techno logies – pp, e+e−and µ+µ−colliders. This is motivated (5) both for a more coherent und erstanding of the future of experimental high energy physics and in recogn ition that the three accelerator technologies are deeply intertwined. Plannin g is underway for such a study to take place in the Summer and Fall of 2001. 18REFERENCES 1. B.J. King, Neutrino Radiation Challenges and Proposed Solutions for M any-TeV Muon Colliders , these proceedings. Also available from http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 2. B.J. King, Discussion on Muon Collider Parameters at Center of Mass Ene rgies from 0.1 TeV to 100 TeV , Proc. EPAC’98, BNL–65716. available from LANL preprint ar chive asphysics/9908016 . 3. B.J. King, Muon Colliders from 10 TeV to 100 TeV , Proc. PAC’99, New York, 1999, pp. 3038-40, available from LANL preprint archive as physics/9908018 . 4. B.J. King, Muon Colliders: New Prospects for Precision Ph ysics and the High Energy Frontier, Proc. Second Latin American Symposium on High Ene rgy Physics, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 8-11 April, 1998, available from LANL preprint archive as hep-ex/9908041 . 5. B.J. King, Prospects for Colliders and Collider Physics to the 1 PeV Ene rgy Scale , these proceedings. Also available from http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 6. The Muon Collider Collaboration, µ+µ−Collider: A Feasibility Study , BNL-52503, Fermilab-Conf-96/092, LBNL-38946, July 1996. 7. Valery Telnov, Limit on Horizontal Emittance in High Energy Muon Colliders due to Synchrotron Radiation , these proceedings. Also available from http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 8. F. Zimmermann, Final Focus Challenges for Muon Colliders at Highest Energi es,ibid. 9. The Muon Collider Collaboration, Status of Muon Collider Research and Development and Future Plans , Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 3 August, 1999. 10. J. Scott Berg, Acceleration for a High Energy Muon Collider , these proceedings. Also available from http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 11. K.R. Symon, The FFAG Synchrotron – MARK 1 , MURA-KRS-6, November 12, 1954, pp. 1-19. 12. Al Garren, A Scaling Radial-Sector FFAG Lattice for a Muon Accelerator , these proceedings. Also available from http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 13. Dejan Trbojevic, Ernest D. Courant and Al Garren, FFAG Lattice Without Opposite Bends ,ibid. 14. Bill Willis, Muon Collider Workshop Summary ,ibid. 15. Mike Harrison, Magnet Challenges: Technology and Affordability , oral presentation at this workshop. Transparency copies can be viewed at http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 16. P. Rehak et al.,Detector Challenges for µ+µ−Colliders in the 10-100 TeV Range , these proceedings. Also available from http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 17. A.A. Zholents, The Potential for an Optical Stochastic Cooling After-Burn er, oral presentation at this workshop. Transparency copies can be v iewed at http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 18. Paul Lebrun, Comments on Frictional Cooling and the Zero Energy Options f or Cool- ing Intense Muon Beams , these proceedings. Also available from 19http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 19. Kanetada Nagamine, Very Low-Energy Cooling Possibilities Towards Muon Collid ers and Neutrino Factory ,ibid. 20. Carol Johnstone, Collider Ring Lattices , oral presentation at this workshop. Trans- parency copies can be viewed at http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 21. Valery Telnov, Some Problems in Plasma Suppression of Beam-Beam Interacti ons at Muon Colliders , these proceedings. Also available from http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/hemc_pape rs.html . 22. Eberhard Keil, Collective Single-Beam Effects ,ibid. 23. Clemens A. Heusch, Physics Opportunities with a High-Energy Collider of Same- Sign Muons ,ibid. 24. B.J. King, parameters and paper in preparation for the EP AC 2000 conference. 20

arXiv:physics/0005009v1 [physics.gen-ph] 5 May 2000One topological secret of gravity and its surprises for astr ophysics, cosmology and particle physics∗ Zahid Zakir Institute of Noosphere, 11a Sayram, Tashkent, 700170 Uzbekistan zahid@in.edu.uz December 10, 2012 Abstract It is shown, that the horizon (2-sphere) in fact is the centra l source point (r=0) for a physical radius in Schwarzschild field and an interior of horizon does not exists. Such topological difference between Newtonnian and relativistic gravity leads to the ob servable effects. The light deflection and the perihelion shift are examples of topological effects. A refle ction on the source of falling matter (mirror horizon effect), a hierarchy of supercompact stars after neu tron stage - multibaryon, quark, (possible) subquark and other heavy particle stars are predicted inste ad of unphysical black holes. It is shown, that the cosmological singularity and quantum field theory d ivergencies are results of ignorance of the nontrivial topology of gravity near gravitational radius a nd they can be simly excluded by taking into account topology of gravity (the renormalization is a such p rescription). 1 Introduction In the general relativity we can use coordinate systems, but true physical picture and true geometry of spacetime in some static gravitational field more rationall y describe in physical variables, directly measured by local observer. In the present paper we describe a particle’s kinematics in S chwarzschild field in term of physical time and physical radius. We will see, that the results of such con sideration not only solve some difficulties of particle physics and cosmology, but lead to many interest ing and intriguing predictions in astrophysics. Detail consideration and discussion will be published in [2 ] 2 Schwarzschild’s world in physical variables and ”mirror h ori- zon” effect The ”orbital” radial coordinate Rin Schwarzschild frame of reference defined as l= 2πR,where lis the length of orbit. This definition leads to the standard formul a for space-time interval ds2(R, ϑ, ϕ ) and it simplified further calculations with appropriate metric te nsor. But the true radius r, which is the physical radial distance from the orbits to the center of the sphere (p oint source), is not equal to Rin curved space. At the same time true physical picture and the physical obser vables of sample particle in the gravitational field depend from the physical distance rbetween the particle and the source. Therefore, we need in th e expression of the physical radius rvia the radial coordinate R. The physical radial interval, measured by the radially orie nted rest scale at the orbit Ris: dr2=dR2 1−rg R(1) ∗To be published in: ”Z.Zakir. Structure of space-time. Part II, paper 16, I.N., Tashkent, 2000.” 13 THE SCATTERING OF FALLING PARTICLES AT THE SOURCE 2 We see, that ∆ r >∆Rwhich means that if sample particle falls from the orbit with length 2 πR1to the orbit with length 2 πR2, the real radial distance of particle’s path (the radial dis tance between two orbits) is equal to ∆ rwhich is longer than an orbit lengths difference ( l1−l2)/2π= ∆R <∆r. For finite radial distances we obtain: r=/integraldisplaydR/radicalBig 1−rg R=R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+ (2) +rgln|/radicalBigg R rg(1 +/radicalbigg 1−rg R)| (3) and finally: r=R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+F(R) (4) where F(R) is positive defined and: F(R)|R=rg= 0 (5) Therefore, we obtain the very important result, that: r(R)|R=rg= 0 (6) This means, that the value of radial coordinate between the o rbit (of the length l= 2πR) and the source is shorter than Rsince the Schwarzschild horizon R=rgis the starting point of the physical radius r= 0. Then the values of radial coordinate R < r gare nonphysical and they are not describe any physical reali ty in the Schwarzschild’s frame. As illustration of last statement, we consider an equation o f motion for the radially falling photon. A physical velocity of photon is equal cin all frames of reference: ds2=c2dτ2−dr2= 0 (7) where dr=/radicalbig −g11(R)dRis the physical radial distance and dτ=√g00dtis the physical time. Therefore, a dependence of Rfrom the physical time is: ±cτ=R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+F(R) (8) or: c2τ2=R(R−rg) +F2(R) + 2F(R)R/radicalbigg 1−rg R(9) Here we take τ= 0 at r= 0 (or R=rg). When the physical time τchanges at intervals ( −∞,0) and (0 ,∞), the physical radius rchanges at intervals ( ∞,0) and (0 ,∞). The trajectory of photon is time symmetric and for the rest observer the photon elastically r eflects from the horizon and it not ”penetrate” to interior ( ”mirror horizon”) . Further we can see that analogous elastically reflection fro m the horizon is available for falling finite mass particles also. Then we can consider inelastic processes wh en falling particles interact with the source. Here the scattering on the horizon for rest frame observer is in fa ct the scattering on source, ’placed’ at r= 0 . 3 The scattering of falling particles at the source Let in the Schwarzschild field the radially moving sample par ticle freely falls from the infinity. The space-time interval of the particle is: ds2= (1−rg R)c2dt2−(1−rg R)−1dR2(10)4 THE TOPOLOGICAL SHIFT RULE AND CLASSICAL EFFECTS OF GENERA L RELATIVITY 3 From the energy conservation condition we have for the falli ng from infinity particle: E=m0c2/radicalBigg 1−rg R 1−v2 c2=m0c2(11) and v2 c2=dr2 c2dτ2=dR2 c2dτ2(1−rg R)−1=rg R(12) Then the dependence of the radial coordinate from the physic al time dτof can be represented as: ±cdτ=1 r1/2 g/radicalBigg R (1−rg R)dR (13) and after integration we obtain: ±cτ=2 3r1/2 g(R−rg)3/2+ 2r1/2 g(R−rg)1/2(14) or: c2τ2=4 9rg(R−rg)[(R−rg)2+ 2rg(R−rg) + 9r2 g] (15) Therefore, we see, that: 1) The falling particle can not cross the ’horizon’ and at all values of T= (−∞,∞) the radial coordinate Rchanges from 0 to ∞. 2) The falling particle elastically reflects at the source r= 0 (or at horizon R=rg) and the process is fully reversible in time. Let local Lorentz frames ( LL-frame ) start falling by zero initial velocity at the same time when meet with the freely falling particle at orbit R. The space-time interval of freely falling particle in term of LL-frame coordinates is: ds2=c2dτ2−dr2(16) where dτis the physical time and dris the physical radius. The physical velocity of freely fall ing particle is equal to: dr2 c2dτ2=v2 c2=rg R(r)(17) and taking into account the relationship between dranddR, we obtain the previous time dependence equation for R(τ). For an observer, which freely fall with particle (L-frame) the distances of S-frame, including the distance between points R= 0 and R=rg,will contract by the increasing of the velocity. At the horiz on, where the falling tends to the light velocity, the distance between R= 0 and R=rgtends to zero and for the falling observer (and particle) the ”interior’ of the S-frame horiz on disappears. 4 The topological shift rule and classical effects of general rela- tivity We see that the standard radial coordinate Rhas an excess nonphysical part, which equal to rgand appears because of the topological difference between the euclidean (or orbital) radius and true radial distance in curved space. For this reason more convenient form of the rad ial coordinate can be the ”topologically corrected” radial coordinate R0: R=R0+rg (18) a zero point of which coincides with a zero point of physical r adius r(R) = 0:4 THE TOPOLOGICAL SHIFT RULE AND CLASSICAL EFFECTS OF GENERA L RELATIVITY 4 R0|R=rg= 0 (19) All physical observables and effects, which depend from the d istance to the source, will contain specifically corrections to the Newtonnian formulas. These corrections appear because of the fact that the radius of the relativistic source has the shift rgand it placed nearer to the same orbit than Newtonnian one. In other words, relativistic source act to the particle at orbit Rexactly same as Newtonnian source act to the particle at orbit R−rg. I will call results of such corrections as topological effects . These effects are results only of the finiteness of light velocity and the principle of equivalence. Therefo re, they will present in any theory of gravity taking into account these two properties of the field. The perihelio n shift, the light deflection and the horizon are such topological effects. Another type of corrections to the Newtonnian observables a ppear due to radial dependence of relativistic and Newtonnian observables, which are different from the abo ve-mentioned source shift. These are geometric effects, depending from details of the field Lagrangian and the type of geometry. This type classical effect is the gravitational red shift of photon frequency. The effec t depends only from the difference of potentials of two orbits and it not depends from the initial point of phys ical radius. As result, in first order the effect has the same value in Newtonnian and relativistic theories. Relativistic source act to the planet at orbit Ras the Newtonnian source act to the planet at orbit R−rg. Therefore we can simply shift the radius in Newtonnian formu la for the angular velocity: ω=/radicalBigg 2Mγ (R−rg)3=2π T0[1 +3rg 2R] (20) and directly obtain Einstein’s formula for the perihelion s hift per period, which for the elliptic orbit with focal parameter Lis: ∆ϕ=3πrg L=6πγM c2L(21) In Newtonnian gravity an angle of the deflection of photons is : α=rg R(22) where Ris nearest distance to the source from the photon’s path. Thi s formula describe a simplified picture, where the gravitational field of the source effectively act only on the part of the photon’s path with length R, and the result of this interaction is falling of the photon n earer to the source ( αR=rg) to the distance rg. If we consider this picture in relativistic gravity, we must take into account that Einsteinnian source act to the photon same as Newtonnian source with R−rg. This means, that if relativistic source begin act to the photon from the same point as Newtonnian one, then the pho ton will fall to rgsince the Newtonnian gravity and it will fall an additional rgsince the difference between relativistic orbit and Newtonn ian one. Then the resulting deflection angle will be two times more tha n in Newtonnian gravity: α=2rg R(23) Thus, we see that due to the topological nature of these two eff ects, first order relativistic corrections to Newtonnian gravity can be obtained without any complicated (geometric) calculations. In term of ”topologically shifted” radial coordinate R0=R−rgthe Schwarzschild’s solution can be written as: ds2= (1 +rg R0)−1c2dt2−(1 +rg R0)dR2 0−(R0+rg)2dΩ2(24) IfR0→0, the interval on the orbital sphere tends to r2 gdΩ2. This is not sufficient for the Schwarzschild’s problem since dΩ2→0. But in cosmology this fact is important and it leads to the e xclusion of cosmological singularity (see below).5 ASTROPHYSICS OF MULTIBARYONIC, MULTIQUARK AND SUBQUARK S TARS 5 5 Astrophysics of multibaryonic, multiquark and subquark s tars The result of preceding considerations leads to a new paradi gm for supercompact states of matter. The interior of horizon is not exist, black holes are unphysical objects and collapse impossible. All spacetime in- tervals for physical objects are timelike or lightlike, the time behavior of physical coordinate of falling matter up to the source ( r= 0) principally not differs from the falling to ordinary star s and they contain gravi- tational contractions only. The principally new phenomena is the disappearing of Newtonnian potential’s singularity. Supercompact stars with physical radius, whi ch less than the gravitational radius, have a finite physical volume and a finite physical density. Hence, the hie rarchy of supercompact stars with ordinary and extraordinary physical matter not stop on the neutron star’ s level, but it continued to more dense physical states. For stars with masses, more than the critical mass of neutron star’s stability M >(3÷5)M⊙, the next family of stable states can appear. This is the family of multiquark hadron (multibaryon and multimeson) stars, containing 3n-quark baryons or 2n-quark mesons. The principally new type of supercompact exotic objects are quark stars, which appear after quark- hadron phase transition at high pressures and temperatures in case of massive supercompact stars. Some of observing candidates to black holes can be multihadronic or multiquark stars. The very important perspective for the particle physics is t he search of supermassive supercompact stars, containing subquarks or other type of substituents of quark s and leptons - subquark stars, and heavy particles of the grand unification and the supergravity - super(symmetry)stars. The falling matter strongly accelerated by a supercompact s tar’s field, than the accelerated matter bombard the surface of the compact star, which here is ideal t arget. The products of such bombardment then will emitt from the surface, then they can interact with other falling matter and resulting rich spectrum can be registered. Therefore, the supercompact stars act as superaccelerators and ideal laboratories for the superhigh energy physics. Thus, instead of unphysical black holes, the general relati vity really predicts the fireworks of hierarchies of exotic supercompact stars, which repeat or represent the hierarchy of high energy particle physics states. The mass spectrum of such exotic stars represent in some appr oximation the mass spectrum of elementary particles. 6 Excluding of the cosmological singularity In the standard cosmological models of the general relativi ty [1] the space-time interval represented as: ds2=a2(η)·dΩ2(η, χ, θ, ϕ ) (25) where adη=cdt. Here the (conformal) radial coordinate a(η) tends to zero at the initial cosmological timet→0 : a2(t) =Bt→0 (26) As result, a density of matter ε(a) tends to infinity (the cosmological singularity): ε=A t2=AB2 a4→ ∞ (27) This problem can be considered qualitatively same as Schwar zschild’s singularity. Here we again deal with the behavior of radial coordinate inside of the gravita tional radius a < r g.Due to the specifically topology of relativistic gravity, this region really not ex ist and can be simply excluded. The space-time interval is: ds2= [a(η) +rg]2·dΩ2(η, χ, θ, ϕ ) (28) and true physical radial parameter of cosmological models i s not a, but ag(t), where a(t) =ag(t) +rg. Since ag(0) = 0 ,we have a=rgand the cosmological singularity disappears: ε0=AB2 r4g(29)7 THE RENORMALIZATION IN FIELD THEORY AS A GRAVITATIONAL SOU RCE SHIFT 6 In term of the physical radial coordinate the size of the Univ erse at initial time is as small as possible in concrete cosmological scenarios of creation, but without t he initial density singularity. 7 The renormalization in field theory as a gravitational sour ce shift The quantum field theory is the theory of local interactions o f point particles. But this locality and pointness of particles lead to infinities for values of physical observ ables. In the relativistic theory of gravity a point particle of fini te mass ”live” inside of its gravitational radius. Therefore, in standard paradigm of general relativity, eac h point particle is the microscopic ”black hole”. From the point of view of the new paradigm, proposed in the pre sent paper, a space distance between two points x1andx2of finite energy quantum point particle is not directly equal toy=x1−x2. Due to the gravitational contraction, it is equal to |y|=ρ+rg,where ρis the true physical distance, rgis the ”gravitational radius”, maximal value of which is equal to P lanck length lp. A size of localization region of quantum particle is inverse proportional to the energy, while the gravita- tional radius is proportional to the energy. These two curve s intersect at Planck length lpand Planck energy. Before Planck scale the wave lengths of quantum fluctuations of particles exceed the ”gravitational radiuses of particles. Here the ordinary quantum theory works succes sfully without gravitational corrections. Thus, we must shift a low limit of integration in space-time i ntegrals from y= 0 to Planck scale lp.As result, we have simple cutting low limits of spacetime integ rals at lpfor taking into account the gravitational shift rule, which automatically excludes divergencies in q uantum field theory observables. We can illustrate this procedure on a simple self energy diag ram for electron in quantum electrodynamics. Let a momentum of electron at initial time is p, at intermediate time q, a momentum of virtual photon is k. The self energy amplitude contains integrals: G=/integraldisplay d4kd4qF(k, q, p)(/integraldisplay d4yei(p−k−q)·y) (30) If limits of spacetime integral over |y|are (0 ,∞), then the integral equal to momentum conservation δ-function, which remove one of momentum integrations. But s econd momentum integral preserved and it is divergent. After the gravitational source shift procedure and integra tion over physical distance ρ, low limit in spacetime integration is lpand the self energy is finite: G=/integraldisplay d4kd4qF(k, q, p)[I|y=∞ y=lp] (31) Such corrections not so great in comparison with bare parame ters. For example, second order corrections to the self energy and charge of electron after such cutting a re approximately 10% from physical mass m and charge eof electron. Therefore, the bare mass and charge of electron are (0 ,8÷0,9)mfrom physical ones. If we want work with δ-function for calculational simplifications, we can write o ld divergent self energy integrals, but then we must substract a nonphysical part of s pacetime integral with limits (0 , lp): G=/integraldisplay d4kd4qF(k, q, p)[I|y=∞ y=0−I|y=lp y=0] (32) We see that this is exactly a renormalization procedure. The refore, we can conclude, that renormalization procedure in quantum field theory ismethod of taking into account gravitational contractions d ue to high energy fluctuations at small distances. 8 Conclusion The Schwarzschild’s world in physical variables becomes si mple and normal from a point of view of traditional physics. Falling matter normally scatters on the source (ho rizon) and no any irreversibility. The interior of the horizon, collapse, irreversibility and singularity ar e disappear, an evaporation make no sense [2] .REFERENCES 7 Only methods and results retain their validity which work wi th exterior of the horizon and not use unphysical variables of the interior of horizon. The general relativity in combination with particle physic s, predicts new families of supercompact exotic stars instead of black holes. It is shown, that the possible physical reason for the appear ing of cosmological singularity may be working by Newtonnian radius in curved relativistic volume. By taki ng into account inexistence of the ”interior” of the horizon, the problem can be solved naturally. Taking into account the specifical topology of gravity allow us to better understand and going to the principal solution of the problem of infinities in quantum fie ld theory. References [1] Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M. (1988) Theory of Field. M. [2] Zakir Z. (2000) Structure of space-time. (in preparatio n)

arXiv:physics/0005010v1 [physics.gen-ph] 5 May 2000Is it Possible to Describe Economical Phenomena by Methods of Statistical Physics of Open Systems? L.Ya. Kobelev, O.L. Kobeleva, Ya.L. Kobelev Department of Problems of Extreme Influence on Matter, Department of Low Temperatures Physics, Ural State Univers ity, Lenina av., 51, Ekaterinburg, 620083, RUSSIA The methods of statistical physics of open systems are used f or describing the time dependence of economic characteristics (income, profit, cost, supply, currency etc.) and their correlations with each other. Nonlinear equations ( analogies of known reacti on-diffusion, kinetic, Langevin equa- tion) describing appearance of bifurcations, self-sustai ned oscillational processes, self-organizations in economic phenomena are offered. I. INTRODUCTION One of the systems consisting of a big number of ele- ments, which exchange information, currency, goods etc. with each other is a market economy. The number of the elements ( for example, of firms characterized by in- come, dividend and investments size, demand and supply value, labor cost and so on) is so great that application of statistical physics methods to describe market economy becomes possible. But now (as it seems) there is no a gen- eral algorithms for subsequent theories applying methods of statistical physics of open systems to market economy (although G.Bystrai [1]- [3],A.Johansen and D.Sernette [4],D.Meodows [5], W.Weidlich [6], I.Lubashevsky [7] used some ideas of fractal geometry and nonequilibrium thermodynamics). In the present paper the methods of constructing of equations to describe economy charac- ters behaviour are stated (see [8]) in the frames of math- ematical formalism developed in statistical physics and describing both self-organization processes and catastro - phes. To do this a number of economic concepts xi(t) (i= 1, ...N;tdenotes time) is introduced and used, different for different economic problems, with xibe- ing able to depend on other economic characteristics as well. The concepts mentioned are then treated as ”coor- dinates” of an economic system. Another set of economic variables Fα(x1...xN, t,˙x1...˙xN) is defined as functions of xi(t), ˙xi(t),∂xi ∂χk(i, j= 1...N, α = 1...β) etc. The set of ”variables” xiand their relations with Fαare rela- tive, that is the ”coordinates” xiin a concrete problem can turn to be functions Fαin another one. If we are to regard Fα(xi(t),˙xi(t),∂xi ∂χj, t) for a given α(i.e.,Fα is a currency rate of exchange) as a set of macroscopic functions characterizing the economic system under con- sideration, it is possible to write down well developed in statistical physics of open systems equations of nonlinear kinetic, reaction-diffusion, oscillational types. Treatm ent of these equations and their solutions, if being applied to a concrete economic problem, allows to describe not only well known economic regularities, but also to define the values of and relations between economic parameters, leading to drastic violations of an equilibrium.II. FORMULATION OF THE EQUATIONS. 1. Consider an economic media consisting of Nele- ments xi(i= 1, ...N). Let this elements define func- tions Fα(not necessary independent ones). If while changing governing parameters the elements themselves change (an active media), then, provided the diffu- sion type relations presence, the time behaviour of Fα(xi(t),˙xi(t),∂xi ∂χj, tset can be described by a reaction diffusion equations dFα(xi, t) dt=ϕα(F) +∂ ∂xi[Dα ij(F)∂Fα ∂xj−Ai(x, t)Fα] + +∂ ∂˙xi[˜Dα ij(F)∂Fα ∂˙xj+ (ai−bi(x, t)Fα] (1) α= 1...β,i, j= 1...N,βis the number of Fafunctions used in the problem under investigation. The full time derivative in the left-hand side of 1 can be represented as (summing up over the repeating indexes) dFα dt=∂Fα ∂t+∂Fα ∂xβ·dxβ dt+∂Fα ∂˙xβ·d˙xβ dt(2) Thus, the system of equations describing an economic situation reads ∂Fα ∂t+∂Fα ∂xβ·dxβ dt+∂Fα ∂˙xβ·d˙xβ dt=Iα (3) where Iα=ϕ(Fi,˙Fi...t) +∂ ∂xi[Dα ij(F)∂Fα ∂xj−Ai(x, t)Fα] + +∂ ∂˙xi[˜Dα ij(F)∂Fα ∂˙xj+ (ai−bi(x, t)Fα] (4) HereDα ij(F1...Fβ),˜Dα ij(F1...Fβ) are the diffusion coeffi- cients in the xiand ˙xi- spaces, depending (including nonlinear dependencies) on F;ϕ(Fi,˙Fi...t) - is a nonlin- ear function, determined by the economic problem data (as well as the other parameters dependencies). In (3) ˙xiand ¨xicharacterize the rate of and the acceleration of 1economic element xbchanging with time; ˙ xiandd˙xi dtcan be determined here by their own equations a)d˙x dt= ˜ϕ1(Fα, B(xi, xj)) b)d2˙x dt2= ˜ϕ2(Fα, A(xi, xj)) where AandBare ”external” influences onto the eco- nomic system). In special cases Iαmay equals zero Iα= 0 for some or all of α(it corresponds neglecting the influence of the factors promoting Fαvarying with time). 2. Above there were formulated equations (1)-(3) de- scribing time dependence of economic parameters (con- sidered as variables or functions) of an open non equilib- rium statistical system and including the description of crisis or self-sustain oscillation processes as well. Neve r- theless, so far as variables xithemselves can depend on the other variables xj(i/ne}ationslash=j) and on functions Fα(xi...) (stress again that in economy, because of the dependence of almost all the factors on each other, the choice of vari- ablesxiand functions Fα(xi...) is quite an arbitrary and may change from one problem to another), one should supplement the eqs. (1)-(3) by a system of equations describing the xidependence on xjandFα. These equa- tions can be chosen basing on the same ideas at the time equations, that is can be obtained by substitution of∂ ∂t for∂ ∂xior for∂ ∂Fα. In the case of reaction-diffusion equa- tions one then writes: dxi dxj=Fij(xj, Fα) +∂ ∂xj(Dx jβ(xj)∂ ∂xβ·xi−Ajxi) + +∂ ∂˙Fα[˜Dγβ(˙x)∂ ∂˙Fβ·xi+ (˜ai−˜bi(x, t)xα)] (5) dxi dFα=˜Fiα+∂ ∂Fγ[(Dγβ(xj)∂ ∂Fβ·xi−Aixα)] + +∂ ∂˙xj[˜D˙x jβ( ˙x)∂ ∂˙xβ·xi+ (˜aj−˜bj(x, t)xi)] (6) 3. One can include in eqs. (5)-(6) terms correspond- ing to ”diffusion” in the ”velocity” space. The sums of such ”diffusion” terms should be added to the right-hand part of these equations. The system of equation (1)-(6) seems to be able to give a full enough description of an economic system behaviour near bifurcation points and phase transitions. 4. Let Iahas the following form (here we neglect by diffusion and nonlinear with respect to Fterms), a)Iα= 0 b)Iα=fα(x)−Fα0 τ τis the relaxation time. Then equation (3) readsa)dFα dt=∂Fα ∂t+∂Fα ∂xβ·dxβ dt+∂Fα ∂˙xβ·d˙xβ dt= 0 b)dFα dt=∂Fα ∂t+∂Fα ∂xβ·dxβ dt+∂Fα ∂˙xβ·d˙xβ dt= (7) =Fα(x)−Fα0 τ Eq. (7a) corresponds to a stationary behaviour of Fα and the time dependence is entirely defined by time de- pendencies of xβand ˙xβ. The case of (7b) characterize the temporal behaviour of the system deviation from the equilibrium state Fα0(x0, t). The relaxation time can be a function of Fα(a nonlinear case). The case of ϕ=α0F+α1F3includes nonlinear equa- tions of Landau-Ginzburg type. III. STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMICS PHENOMENON BY KINETIC EQUATIONS Equations (3)-(4) govern the behaviour of functions Fa which are set by a xivalues. Introduce therefore a set of values taken by every of the variables xi. Let them be distributed in a random way. Then introduce a function fα(xi, ..., t) of density of probability to find at the time of t values of the economic parameters to be equal to xi (i= 1...N) (here we use one and the same symbol xi for an economic parameter and its value). For the mean values we shall have /an}bracketle{tFα/an}bracketri}ht=/integraldisplay Fα(xi...)fα(xi)dxi and the equations for fαchose as d fα dt=Iα (8) where Iαandd fα dtare as follows: d fα dt=∂fα ∂t+∂fα ∂i·dxi dt+∂fα ∂˙xi·d˙xi dt(9) Iα=ϕα(f, t) +∂ ∂xi[Dα ij(f)∂fα ∂xj−Ai(x, t)fα] + (10) +∂ ∂˙xi[˜Dα ij(f)∂fα ∂˙xj+ (ai−bi(x, t)fα] These equations corresponds to the statistical descriptio n of economic systems in terms of kinetic equations (well known in the theory of open systems [9]) for the economic parameters distribution function and allow to calculate the mean values for economic functions Fa. Adduce now one more method of statistical description of economic parameters xiandFabased on using of equation like that of Brownian motion in thermostat. The role of the ”thermostat” is played in economy by external influences 2(e.g. currency infusion and so on) supporting any of the system parameters to be constant (currency rate of ex- change in our case correspondingly). Then the equation forFais of Langevin type and for the only function F has the form d2F dt2+γ(F)dF dt+β(F) =Y(t) (11) where γ(t) and β(t) are nonlinear with respect to Fco- efficients, Y(t) is a random process corresponding, e.g., to a random influence of prices, demand etc. The processes described by (11) can also be described in terms of the distribution function f(F, x, t) and equations like (8)-(10). IV. ECONOMICAL PHENOMENON IN THE MULTIFRACTAL ECONOMICAL SPACES Many facts show on the possibility of useful describing of economical phenomenon [4]and phenomenon of social life [10], [4] by using idea of fractal dimensions. Thus we point out the way of generalize of equations of above paragraphs for multifractal economical spaces. For in- cluding multifractal characteristics in equations (1)-(1 1) we must use generalized Riemann-Liouville derivatives defined in [11] Dd +,tf(t) =/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayt af(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t−t′)d(t′)−n+1(12) Dd −,tf(t) =/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayb t(−1)nf(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t′−t)d(t′)−n+1(13) where Γ( x) is Euler’s gamma function, and aandbare some constants from [0 ,∞). In these definitions, as usu- ally,n={d}+ 1 , where {d}is the integer part of dif d≥0 (i.e. n−1≤d < n ) and n= 0 for d <0. If d=const, the generalized fractional derivatives (GFD) (12)-(13) coincide with the Riemann - Liouville fractional derivatives ( d≥0) or fractional integrals ( d <0). In the equations (1)-(11)for taking into account multifrac- tal characteristics of economics phenomenon it is neces- sary change ordinary derivatives by generalized Riemann- Liouville derivatives. V. CONCLUSION The equations given above are quite general and wit- ness only a possibility of describing economic processes in terms of the mathematical formalism used in statistical physics of open systems in the economical (topological or fractal) spaces . Taking into account that in market econ- omy one can observe catastrophes (e.g.,financial crises, bankrupts, fast changes in the current exchange rate) inmacro and microeconomic and stable processes like self regulations, and the processes of development (stagna- tion, demolishing) are determined by statistical reasons, using of the methods of statistical physics given in the present paper may turn to be very fruitful. A general al- gorithm for economic processes description on the basis of statistical physics equations for open system (mainly, equations of reaction-diffusion type) is proposed. It con- tains wide opportunities to use nonlinear equations and governing parameters for economic problems, so far not developed in a systematic way. The methodics described can be easily adjusted to study mathematical regulari- ties in biology, medicine, geology etc . We ask apology for absence in this article of grate amount of cites at eco- nomical papers concerning the mathematical problems of economics because we can not find direct connection our description with known description of economical prob- lems. The authors thank Ph.D. V.L.Kobeleva, the mem- ber of our research group, for useful and fruitful discus- sion and grate help. [1] G.P.Bystrai. Analytical Macroeconomics: dynamics of the non-equilibrium processes. (Ekaterinburg: Ural State University,1994)(in Russian) [2] G.P.Bystrai., Analytical Macroeconomics: Management on the eve of Chaos. in the Third Inter. Workshop on Ar- tificial Intelligence in Economic and Management. Port- land, Oregon, USA, Aug.25-27, 1993. [3] G.P.Bystrai, Dynamic Chaos in Macroeconomics: The problem of formalized description. , in Conf. ”Evolution- ary Econ. and Chaos Theory.” Amsterdam, May.6-8, 1993.,P.17-18. [4] A.Johansen and D.Sernette, The End of Growth Era?,xxx.arXiv:cond-mat/0002075 [5] D.H.Meodows at el. (1992) The Limits to Growth: A re- port for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. (N.Y.) [6] W.Weidlich. Physics and Social Science - the Approach of Synergetics. , Phys. Rep. 1991.V.201. P.1-163. [7] I.A.Lubashevsky, V.V.Cafiychuk, A simple Model of self- regulation in Large Natural Systems , J. Environment Sci- ences 1995. V.23. N.3. P.281-289. [8] Kobelev L.Ya.,Kobelev Ya.L.,Kobelev V.L., About Statistical Describing of Economical Phenomenon, Dep.v.VINITI 15.12.1995, Numb.33-45-B95 (in Russian) [9] Yu.L.Klimontovich. Statistical Theory of Open Systems v.1(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,1995) [10] L.Ya.Kobelev,L.L.Nugaeva, Will the Population of Hu- manity in the Future be Stabilized? xxx.arXiv: physics/0003035; L.Ya.Kobelev and L.L.Nugaeva, Will the Population of Humanity in the Future be Stabilized?, Dep.v VINITI 09.07.1999, Numb.2253-B99 (in Russian) [11] L.Ya.Kobelev, Generalized Riemann-Liouville Fracti onal Derivatives for Multifractal Sets,xxx.arXiv: 3math.CA/0002008 4

arXiv:physics/0005011v1 [physics.gen-ph] 5 May 2000About the Dependence of the Currency Exchange Rate at Time an d National Dividend, Investments Size, Difference Between Total Deman d and Supply L.Ya. Kobelev, O.L. Kobeleva, Ya.L. Kobelev Department of Problems of Extreme Influence on Matter, Department of Low Temperatures Physics, Ural State Univers ity, Lenina av., 51, Ekaterinburg, 620083, RUSSIA The time dependence of the currency exchange rate Ktreated as a function of national dividend, investments and difference between total demand for a goods a nd supply is considered. To do this a proposed earlier general algorithm of economic processes describing on the basis of the equations forKlike the equations of statistical physics of open systems is used. A number of differential equations (including nonlinear ones too) determining the t ime dependence of the exchange rate (including oscillations) is obtained. 1. L.Ya.Kobelev et al. [1] in order to describe eco- nomic phenomena offered a system of nonlinear differen- tial equations based on the mathematical methods of sta- tistical physics of open systems ( [2]).(see also [3]- [11]) . The present paper is devoted to consideration of a model example of calculation of time dependence of national currency exchange rate treated as a function of national dividend F, investments C and total difference between demand and supply (with all the values being measured in national currency units). The modality of the exam- ple considered is in neglecting of dependencies of national currency upon the others, not mentioned economic vari- ables, so the main purpose of this paper is not so to elucidate real economic laws and regularities (although this also takes place) as to illustrate the possibilities of the offered in the named paper method if applied to a concrete problem. 2. Thus, to show the advantages of the method used consider the dependence of the currency exchange rate upon investments C, difference between total demand and supply P, and national dividend F. Let K be a vari- ation of the currency exchange rate per time unit. In this case the equations describing the exchange rate as a function of C,PandFtakes the form of the simplified equations (3), (4), (7) of the paper [1] dK dt=∂K ∂t+∂K ∂CdC dt+∂K ∂PdP dt+∂K ∂FdF dt=IC(1) IC=ϕ(K) +∂ ∂C(DC∂ ∂CK) + +∂ ∂p(DP∂ ∂PK) +∂ ∂F(DF∂ ∂FK) (2) The equations describing time dependencies of C,P,F and the dependence of the currency exchange rate upon them write down as follows: dK dxi=Fi(xi, K) +∂ ∂xj[Djβ∂ ∂xβ(xi−Ajxi)] (3) dxi dt=ϕ(xj,˙xj, K,˙K,∂K ∂xj) (4)where i= 1,2,3 (x1=C,x2=P,x3=F),Fiandφ are nonlinear functions of their own arguments. In eqs. (2)-(3) the terms containing DC,DPandDFcoefficients describe ”diffusion” in the space of the exchange rate al- teration variables C,P,F, i.e., the distribution of Kover these variables, and the φ(K) terms describe the depen- dence ofdK dtupon the processes regulating the velocity of the exchange rate alteration (in particular, a currency exchange rate relaxation, bistable states existence etc.) . 3. In the simplest case chose C= 0, that is, consider the equation dK dt=∂K ∂t+∂K ∂CdC dt+∂K ∂PdP dt+∂K ∂FdF dt= 0 (5) The equality IC=0 corresponds to neglecting by the cur- rency exchange rate alteration smoothing processes influ- ence ondK ∂t. The∂K ∂C,∂K ∂Pand∂K ∂Fderivatives in (5) are determined, in difference with kinetic theory in statistica l physics, by eqs.(3) and the derivatives ˙ xiare governed by (4). 4. Consider now, for the sake of simplicity, the case when the influence of PandFon the currency exchange rate alteration is very small and may not be taken into account. Then ∂K ∂t+∂K ∂CdC dt= 0 (6) To define∂K ∂CdC dtwe use a reduced equations (1)-(4) dC dt=a/integraldisplayt 0K(t)dt (7) ∂K ∂C=α (8) where αin (7) is a velocity of changing in investments attributed to the sum of the currency exchange rate al- teration over the time interval of tandαin (8) is the changing in the currency exchange rate alteration per in- vestments unit. 1Assume then that these values do not vary significantly, that is α=const anddC dt=b=const. In this case we will have∂K ∂t=K1=abandK=K1t+K2 (K2=const. ). SoKwill increase or decrease, depending upon the sign of K1. In case of (7), differentiating (6) in time and using (13) from paper [1] and (8) yield ∂2K ∂t2+ω2 0K= 0 where ω0=√aα. The solution of (9) has the form K=K0sinω0t where K0is constant. So with the assumption made, the currency exchange rate alteration Kvaries periodically in time with the frequency of√aα. If the dependence ofKupon the investments made is weak, the frequency of oscillations will be small and K will take the form (ω0t≪1) K=K0√aαt+...√aαt≪1 At times large enough, nevertheless, the periodicity of the currency exchange rate varying with time will be ob- served. 5. Introduce now into the right-hand side of eq.(5) a parameter characterizing the deviation of Kfrom an equilibrium: Ic=K−K0 τ(K), where τ(K) is the relaxation time for the currency exchange rate alteration if diverged from a stationary state K0(in general case τis a function ofK,˙K,C,Fetc.) Then instead of (6) we have ∂K ∂t+∂K ∂CdC dt=K−K0 τ(K)(9) Assuming K0=const andτ=const differentiating in time, if eqs. (7) and (8) are valid, yields: ¨K+ω2 0K−1 τ˙K= 0 whose solution is K=k0e−t τcosω0t In this case the oscillations of the currency exchange rate changing will damp tending to zero when t≪τ. 6. Take into account in equation (9) the difference P between total demand and supply influence on the ex- change rate alteration, determiningdP dtand∂K ∂Pfrom the equations (a special case of (1) and (4)) a)dP dt=γ˙K,∂K ∂P=βK2 b)dP dt=βK2,∂K ∂P=γ˙Kwith linear (a) or nonlinear (b) dependence ofdP dtupon ˙KorKcorrespondingly. Then instead of (9) we get ∂K ∂t+aα/integraldisplayt 0K(t′)dt′+βγK2˙K=K−K0 τ(K)(10) or, after differentiating with respect to time (1 +βγK2)¨K−(1 τ−2βγK˙K)˙K+ω2 0K= 0 (11) IfβγK2≪1 and 2 βγK˙K≫1 τ, then (10) reduces to ¨K+ 2δ(K˙K)˙K+ω2 0K= 0 (12) where δ(K˙K) =βγK˙K Eq. (11) is an equation of oscillations with a nonlinear friction 2 δ(K˙K) and its solutions contains all the pecu- liarities of nonlinear systems. Take into consideration in (10) the term∂ ∂P(DP∂ ∂P)K, assuming DP=const. This yields a change in coefficient at in (12) in the case (a) (1 +βγK2)¨K−(1 τ−2βγK˙K+DPβ2K2)˙K+ (13) +ω2 0K= 0 and appearance of a term containingd3K dt3in the case (b) γ2D2 Pd3K dt3−(1 +βγK2)¨K− −2β(K˙K)˙K−ω2 0K= 0 7. One may take into account in (10) the terms con- taining∂K ∂FdF dtassuming, for example, DF=const, and (a special case of (1)-(4)) a)∂K ∂F=b/integraldisplayt 0K(t′)dt′,dF dt=d=const (14) b)∂K ∂F=d=const,dF dt=/integraldisplayt 0K(t′)dt′ Eqs. (13) then takes the from ((14a) case) (1 +βγK2)¨K−(1 τ−2βγK˙K+DPβ2K2)˙K+ [(ω2 0+bd)K−DFβ2/integraldisplayt 0K(t′)dt′] = 0 (15) and after differentiating in t (1 +βγK2)d3K dt3−(1 τ−2βγK˙K+DPβ2K2)′˙K+ +(1 τ−2βγK˙K+DPβ2K2)¨K+ (16) +[(ω2 0+bd)˙K−DFβ2K(t)] + 2βγK˙K¨K= 0 2Using (14b) one obtains (1 +βγK2)¨K−(1 τ2βγK˙K+DPβ2K2)˙K+ +(ω2 0+bd)K= 0 Consider finally a case of nonlinear dependence of IC uponK. Let, remaining the assumptions of the previous paragraphs concerning the dependencies of Kupon D, CandF,IChas the form IC=t/integraldisplay 0(l0−lK2)Kdt+K−K0 τ+DP∂2K ∂P2+ (17) +DC∂2K ∂C2+DF∂2K ∂F2 The choice of (17) corresponds to nonlinear type of K(t) relaxation. Substituting ICfrom (17) (e.g., for (14b) case) into (2) yields (using the proper equations for derivatives of K,C,P,F): (1 +βγK2)¨K+(2βγK˙K−DPβ2K2−1 τ)˙K+ (18) +[(ω2 0+bd)−(l0−lK2)]K= 0 Eq. (18) has a bifurcation point at K=±1√ l/radicalBig l0−ω2 0−bd (which corresponds to the appearance of a bistable state for the currency exchange rate alteration) and a number of other interesting peculiarities as well (in particular, at K=±/radicalBig 1 |γβ|, (γβ < 0), atK=1 DPβ2(−βγ˙K±/radicalbigg (βγ˙K)2+2DPβ2 τ, at˙K=DPβ2K±/radicalbig DPβ2K2−8βγ(ω2 0+bd−l0−lK2) 4γβ, etc.) 8. Note, that wide opportunities to chose the equations for∂K ∂C,∂K ∂P,∂K ∂FanddC dt,dP dt,dF dtandICare not ex- hausted by the selection used in the example considered and the concrete forms of the equations are determined by the state of the economic processes and correlations between them. For example, one may treat as xivari- ables in the case considered realized Yeand produced Yl gross national products, the total sum of money in use, the number of workable population N, absolute level of unemployment δN, the part of gross national product used by the state (these variables were used by Bystrai ( [3]) while defining the economic entropy.CONCLUSION A general algorithm of describing economic processes basing on the equations of statistical physics of open sys- tems developed by Kobelev L.Ya. et al. [1] was used to describe the time dependence of the national currency exchange rate as a function of national dividend, invest- ments size and difference between total demand for the goods and its supply. A number of nonlinear differential equations describing the time dependence of exchange rate (in particular, oscillations in different cases) were obtained. [1] L.Ya.Kobelev, Ya.L.Kobelev, V.L.Kobelev, About Statistical Describing of Economical Phenomenon, Dep.v.VINITI 15.12.1995, Numb.33-45-95 (in Russian) [2] Yu.L.Klimontovich. Statistical theory of open systems. V.1(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,1995) [3] G.P.Bystrai. Analytical Macroeconomics: Dynamics of the Non-equilibrium processes. (Ekaterinburg: Ural State University,1994)(in Russian) [4] A.Johansen and D.Sernette, The End of Growth Era?,xxx.arXiv:cond-mat/0002075 [5] L.Ya.Kobelev, L.L.Nugaeva, Will the Population of Hu- manity in the Future be Stabilized?(xxx.arXiv:physics/0003035; L.Ya.Kobelev and L.L.Nugaeva, Will the Population of Humanity in the Future be Stabilized? Dep.v VINITI 09.07.1999, Numb.2253-B99 (in Russian) [6] L.Ya.Kobelev,Generalized Riemann-Liouville Fractio nal Derivatives for Multifractal Sets, xxx.arXiv:math.CA/0002008 [7] W.Weidlich. // Physics and Social Science - the Ap- proach of Synergetics. // Phys. Rep. 1991.V.201. P.1-163. [8] I.A.Lubashevsky, V.V.Cafiychuk. // A Simple Model of Self-regulation in Large Natural Systems // J. Environ- ment Sciences 1995. V.23. N.3. P.281-289. [9] G.P.Bystrai.// Analytical Macroeconomics: Management on the Eve of Chaos. //The Third Inter. Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Economic and Management. Portland, Oregon, USA, Aug.25-27, 1993. [10] G.P.Bystrai.// Dynamic Chaos in Macroeconomics: The Problem of Formalized Description. // Conf. ”Evolution- ary Economics and Chaos Theory.” Amsterdam, May.6- 8, 1993.,P.17-18. [11] D.H.Meodows at el. (1992) The Limits to Growth: A re- port for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. (N.Y.) 3

arXiv:physics/0005012v1 [physics.gen-ph] 6 May 2000Time symmetric action-at-a-distance electrodynamics and the structure of SpaceTime C˘ alin Galeriu Physics Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA, 0161 0, USA This paper begins with a critical analysis of the concept of ’ material point particle’. We argue that this concept is incompatible with the force laws of acti on-at-a-distance electrodynamics, and we suggest that the trajectory of a particle (the world-line) s hould be looked upon as a string in static equilibrium. By complementing our model with a time symmetr ic interaction law, we are led to a straightforward derivation of the principles underlying t he electromagnetic interaction between two uniformly moving charged particles. An extension of our the ory to the case of particles in arbitrary motion shows that we have to modify Maxwell’s equations of th emicroscopic electromagnetic field, in order to accommodate a field-strength tensor which is no long er antisymmetric. It is further argued that the radiation reaction force gives another example of a 4-force which is not orthogonal to the 4-velocity, thus leading to a variable rest mass. The variat ion of the rest mass is then discussed from the point of view of the equivalence principle of general rel ativity, and we end up with a theoretical derivation of the homogenous Maxwell’s equations. I. INTRODUCTION It is well known that the general solution of Maxwell’s equat ions for the electromagnetic field is a sum of two contributions, one due to the retarded potential and anothe r due to the advanced potential [1]. Since the advanced solution does not seem to be observed in nature, several appr oaches have been developed to deal with this problem. Ritz [2] assumes that the retarded solution of the electroma gnetic field is of a more fundamental nature than Maxwell’s equations from whom it initially originated. Dirac [3] inst ead stresses the importance of ingoing (advanced) and outgoing (retarded) radiation fields as boundary condition s for Maxwell’s differential equations. The main result of Dirac’s work is a derivation of the radiative reaction force acting on an accelerated electron, with no reference to the internal structure of the electron. The theory however rais es further questions, due to the introduction of acausal effects, and due to the ad hoc elimination of the divergence resulting from the interacti on of the electron with its own generated field. Tetrode [4] has proposed to interpret the el ectromagnetic radiation as a consequence of an interaction between a source and an observer. The elimination of the elec tromagnetic field as a stand alone entity was not a new idea. Ritz [2] has argued that the field is a mathematical arti fact, since one can observe only the Lorentz force acting on charged particles. Relativistic action-at-a-distance electrodynamics considers the null cone of special relativ ity as the surface of interparticle action [1]. By eliminating the electromagnetic field one also eliminates the problem of the self-interaction divergence, and this is one of the main adv antages of action-at-a-distance electrodynamics [5]. Whe eler and Feynman [6], using time symmetric action-at-a-distanc e and field theory as equivalent and complementary tools, have shown that, if we suppose a completely absorbing Univer se, then all the advanced effects are canceled out except those which are comprised in the force of radiative reaction . They further describe how, in spite of the time symmetric interaction used, the irreversibility of the emission proc ess appears as a phenomenon of statistical mechanics connec ted with the asymmetry of the initial conditions with respect to time. The elaborations in this present paper, although not emerging directly from the work of the previously cited a uthors, are a further development of time symmetric action-at-a-distance electrodynamics. II. THE WORLD-LINE OF A PARTICLE IS A STRING IN STATIC EQUILIB RIUM Consider the following paradoxical situation: a force along the x-axis can modify the y-component of the vel ocity of a particle . An example of such a situation is the motion of a relativisti c charged particle (with a non-zero initial y-component of the velocity) in a uniform electric field paral lel to the x-axis [7]. The origin of this situation lies in the fact that the magnitude of the 4-momentum is constant. Th e projection of the 4-momentum onto a 3D real space introduces into the expressions of the x, yandzcomponents of the relativistic momentum a dependence on the vx, vy andvzcomponents of the velocity. Thus, while vxis affected more directly by the applied force, the vycomponent needs also to change (when vxchanges), such that the y-component of the relativistic momentum remains constant. Since there is no a priori reason for the magnitude of the 4-momentum to be constant, on e can at least ask whether there is a physical interpretation for this remarkable fact . The answer to the question is: yes, there is a perfect analogy between a string under constant tension and a world- line in 4D Minkowski space, between the tension in the 1string (constant in magnitude and always tangent to the stri ng) and the 4-momentum (constant in magnitude and always tangent to the world-line). The analogy goes even fur ther, since we can show that the equations of motion for a material point particle are equivalent with the static equ ilibrium condition for a 4D string. Indeed, consider two events, A and B, along the world-line of a particle, separate d by an infinitesimal interval ds=i c dτ , as shown in Figure 1. Then the equation of motion of the particle PB−PA dτ=F (1) can be rewritten as the static equilibrium condition TB+ (−TA) +fds= 0 (2) for a string under a tension T=icP/so=P/τoand acted upon by a linear force density f=−F/so(notice the change of sign, related to the change in direction of the forc e, as pictured in Figure 1 - we thus have to consistently swap attraction and repulsion when switching between the tw o models). For dimensional reasons we have introduced the constant so=icτo, heuristically called ’the length of a particle’, measured along its world-line. Although at this moment the advantage of writing (2) instead of (1) is not evident, we will recall that the static description is closer to the mathematical structure of Spac eTime: ”The objective world simply is; it does not happen. Only to the gaze of my consciousness, crawling upward along t he life line [world-line] of my body, does a section of this world come to life as a fleeting image in space which conti nuously changes in time.” [8] III. MATERIAL POINT PARTICLES ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH ACTION -AT-A-DISTANCE ELECTRODYNAMICS Two fundamental postulates are required to describe the ele ctromagnetic interaction between two uniformly moving charged particles [9]. The first postulate is that in a refere nce frame where all the source charges producing a Coulombian electric field Eare at rest, the force on a charge qis given by F=qEindependent of the velocity of the charge in that frame [10]. The second postulate is the orthog onality of the 4-force to the 4-velocity, required in order to have the constant magnitude of the 4-momentum preserved. From this two postulates one can calculate the 4-force (in Gaussian units) with which a source charge Q, at rest at the origin, is acting on a test charge q, at a distance R and moving with velocity v: Freal=ˆRQq R2γ(v) (3) Fimag=ˆiQq R2γ(v)vrad c(4) where the radial component of the velocity is vrad=ˆR·v. Although generally accepted, the above two postulates rais e some questions. We usually think of a particle as being a point in Minkowski space: ”We fix our attention on the substa ntial point which is at the world-point x, y, z, t , and imagine that we are able to recognize this substantial point at any other time.” [11] But, from the local point of view, a point in Minkowski space i s just a fixed point, it does not have a velocity! The velocity comes from the tangent to the world-line of the part icle. Consequently we have to consider more that one point (one instance of the material point particle) on the wo rld-line in order to observe the velocity. We are thus lead to the conclusion that the 4-force from (3)-(4), the relevan t Minkowski vector of the problem, is incompatible with the material point particle model, since we have in the 4-for ce (3)-(4) an explicit dependence on the velocity of the test particle. Another argument in favor of our conclusion i s that one cannot define, in SpaceTime, a relativistically invariant distance between two interacting material point particles. This is because, due to the speed of light at which the interaction propagates, the SpaceTime interval betwee n the two points is null. There is no privileged reference frame such that the two events be at the same place or happen at the same time (which would have allowed us to define a relativistically invariant scalar - the distance be tween the particles in the same-time frame, or the delay between the events in the same-place frame). The radius Rentering (3)-(4) is the direct result of the selection of the reference frame in which the source charge is at rest, but thi s, once again, requires us to consider the velocity of this particle. 2IV. AN IMAGINATIVE ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF TIME SYMMETRIC ELECT RODYNAMICS A strange thing happens when we introduce the finite velocity of propagation of the electromagnetic interaction. While in the old instantaneous action model there is a strong electrostatic component directed along the line connectin g the two interacting particles, this is no longer the case whe n we introduce the retardation time. It is no longer intuitively clear why two attracting particles (in a system having no angular momentum) will end up in the same SpaceTime point. However, we might imagine the actual elect romagnetic 4-force as being the sum of two 4-forces (the retarded and the advanced one, as shown in Figure 2) which are directed along the lines connecting the interacting particles. In the stationary case the imaginary components of these 4-forces just cancel, and the real components produce the Coulombian force. As we will see in the next secti on, this picture is correct, up to a change of sign for the imaginary 4-force components. V. AN ALL-GEOMETRICAL DERIVATION FOR THE ELECTROMAGNETIC I NTERACTION BETWEEN TWO UNIFORMLY MOVING PARTICLES We will introduce now a physical model which is consistent wi th all the previous considerations. Instead of a material point particle with mass moand charge q, we will consider a 4D string (the world-line) with linear ma ss density µo=mo/soand linear charge density ρ=q/so. If particles are regarded as points, then each particle (on e point) interacts with all other particles (points) which li e in the past (or future) part of its light cone. On the other hand, a particle of length so(an infinitesimal length element along the world-line) inte racts with all of the segments of the world-lines of other particles which are included bet ween the light cones of the starting point of the segment soand of the ending point of the same segment. Accordingly, the electrostatic force law F=Qq/R2between a point source charge Qand a point test charge qwill be replaced by a 4-force F= (ρQSo)(ρqso)/R2= (Qq/R2)(So/so), acting on a ’particle’ of length so, and corresponding to an electrostatic linear 4-force dens ity law −f=F/so. Of course, since the linear force density is meant to act on an in finitesimal length element, the segment sohas to be very small (probably less than 10−15cm), but still not zero, since it appears in the denominator o f the linear mass, charge and 4-force densities. It is obvious that, if the two particl es are at rest, or move with the same velocity, then So=so, and we recover the Coulombian electrostatic interaction. W e will next show that, if there is a relative velocity between the two particles, then the So/solength ratio is responsible for the dependence on the veloci ty of the 4-force given in (3)-(4). We will thus analyze the situation of a source parti cle at rest, and of a test particle at a position Rrelative to the first one, moving with velocity v. A. Length ratios for radial velocity Consider first the simpler case of only radial motion. We will use the same geometrical technique developed in [9]. If the test particle (AB) has only a radial velocity v, it will ’see’ a segment (FG) in the past of the source particl e, and a segment (HI) in the future, as shown in Figure 3. DC=CE=i CB =i AB sin(−α) (5) AC=ABcos(−α) (6) FG=AD=AC−DC=AB[cos(−α)−isin(−α)] =AB γ(v)(1−v/c) (7) HI=AE=AC+CE=AB[cos(−α) +isin(−α)] =AB γ(v)(1 +v/c) (8) Thus the length ratio for the retarded part is γ(v)(1−v/c), and for the advanced part is γ(v)(1 + v/c). B. Length ratios for arbitrary velocity What happens if the test particle has a velocity, but not only in the radial direction? We will rotate our 3D reference frame in such a way that the radial direction gives the Ox dire ction, and that the velocity of the test particle lies in the (xOy) plane. The radial component of the velocity is th erefore vy. Consider a point A on the world-line of 3the second particle, as shown in Figure 4. We have to find the po ints H and J at which the world-line of the source particle intersects the light cones of the point A. For this w e draw, from the point A, a parallel to Oy, which intersects the (xOict) plane at B. From B, a parallel to Ox intersects the Oict axis at C, and the world-line of the source particle at F. OC=EF=ict (9) CB=vxt (10) BA=vyt (11) EO=FC=R (12) OA=/radicalbig OC2+CB2+BA2=it/radicalBig c2−v2x−v2y (13) FA=/radicalbig BA2+ (FC+CB)2=/radicalBig v2xt2+ (R+vyt)2 (14) GE=EI=i EO =iR (15) HF=FJ=i FA=i/radicalBig v2xt2+ (R+vyt)2 (16) For the segment GH from the past: GH=GF−HF=GE+EF−HF=iR+ict−i/radicalBig v2xt2+ (R+vyt)2 (17) For the segment IJ from the future: IJ=EJ−EI=EF+FJ−EI=ict+i/radicalBig v2xt2+ (R+vyt)2−iR (18) Assuming an infinitesimal length OA of the test particle, and using l’Hˆ opital rule, it follows that: limA→OGH OA=limt→0iR+ict−i/radicalbig v2xt2+ (R+vyt)2 it/radicalBig c2−v2x−v2y=c−vy/radicalBig c2−v2x−v2y=γ(v)(1−vrad c) (19) limA→OIJ OA=limt→0ict+i/radicalbig v2xt2+ (R+vyt)2−iR it/radicalBig c2−v2x−v2y=c+vy/radicalBig c2−v2x−v2y=γ(v)(1 +vrad c) (20) Thus the length ratio for the retarded part is γ(v)(1−vrad/c), and for the advanced part is γ(v)(1 + vrad/c). C. The postulates of the new time symmetric action-at-a-dis tance electrodynamics Corresponding to the length ratios just derived, if we have a source particle of charge Q(a world-line of linear charge density Q/s o) at rest at the origin, a test particle of charge q(a segment of length soalong a world-line of linear density q/so) will ’see’ a charge Qγ(v)(1−vrad/c) in the past, and a charge Qγ(v)(1 + vrad/c) in the future. We postulate that, in the reference frame in which the source particle is at rest, the 4-force acting on the test particle will have a real radial component proportional to the (-2) po wer of the distance Ron the real axis, and an imaginary component proportional to the (-2) power of the distance iRon the imaginary axis. Consequently, attraction on the real axis is associated with repulsion on the imaginary axis , andvice versa . Both components of the 4-force will be 4proportional to the product of charges. We also postulate th at we have interaction with both the future and the past. Because the two contributions will add, the proportionalit y constant in the Coulombian 4-force will be multiplied by 1/2. This corresponds to adding one half of the retarded potent ial to one half of the advanced one, in a time symmetric electrodynamics [1]. The 4-forces acting on the test particle, as shown in Figure 5 , will be: Fpast,real=ˆR1 2Qq R2γ(v)(1−vrad c) (21) Fpast,imag=−ˆi1 2Qq R2γ(v)(1−vrad c) (22) Ffuture ,real=ˆR1 2Qq R2γ(v)(1 +vrad c) (23) Ffuture ,imag=ˆi1 2Qq R2γ(v)(1 +vrad c) (24) The total 4-force will have the real and imaginary parts: Freal=Fpast,real+Ffuture ,real=ˆRQq R2γ(v) (25) Fimag=Fpast,imag+Ffuture ,imag=ˆiQq R2γ(v)vrad c(26) in agreement with (3) and (4). We believe that the geometrical derivation of the Coulombia n interaction between two charged particles that we have given brings us closer to Minkowski’s vision: ”[...] in my opinion physical laws might find their most perfect expression as reciprocal relations between these world-li nes.” [11] Our theory of time symmetric action-at-a-distance electro magnetic interaction applies well to the case of uniformly moving charged particles. It is worth remembering that, alt hough initially emerging from experiments with electro- static charge distributions and stationary currents, ”Max well’s equations are often used in a wider context, such as for accelerating charges, than the experimental evidence, on the basis of which they are normally developed.” [12] Maxwell’s equations for accelerated charges are thus check ed only a posteriori . In a recently developed action-at-a- distance Gaussian electrodynamics [13] new tangential for ce components are also predicted for accelerated charges. VI. THE RADIATIVE REACTION 4-FORCE IS PARALLEL TO THE 4-VELO CITY It is not hard to see that, if we apply our interaction model to accelerated charges, then the total 4-force, in general, will no longer be orthogonal to the 4-velocity of the test par ticle. It can be shown that, in general, our relativistic Lorentz 4-force is still given by Fα= (q/c)TαβVβ, with the only difference that the field-strength tensor Tαβis no longer antisymmetric. We will try first to answer the fundame ntal question of whether a 4-force can be not orthogonal to the 4-velocity. This problem has appeared long ago, when the ponderomotive 4 -force, in a system which dissipates energy by Joule heating, was considered [14]. Abraham [15] has shown t hat, since an inertial mass must be ascribed to every kind of energy ( E=moc2), the rest mass of the system has to decrease, corresponding to the Joule hea t dissipated. The ponderomotive 4-force must thus have a component parall el to the 4-velocity, and the equations of motion are modified accordingly: F=d dτ(moV) =modV dτ+Vdmo dτ(27) It is worth mentioning that equation (27) can still be interp reted as the static equilibrium conditions for a 4D string, however this time under a variable tension (the tension is pr oportional to the rest mass). From (27), the rate of energy dissipation is given by the 4-force component parallel to th e 4-velocity: 5(F·V) =−c2dmo dτ=−γ(v)dE dt(28) It is questionable why the same approach has not been applied to the case of radiation damping. The radiative reaction force is introduced in order to satisfy an energy ba lance, for the nonrelativistic situation first [10]. Thus th e work done by the radiative reaction force has to equal the ene rgy dissipated through electromagnetic radiation: /integraldisplayt2 t1(Frad·v)dt=−2 3q2 c3/integraldisplayt2 t1(˙v·˙v)dt⇒2 3q2 c3/integraldisplayt2 t1(¨v·v)dt (29) The last part of (29) results from the Larmor power formula (3 4), if we integrate by parts, and assume that the motion is either periodic, or ( ˙v·v) = 0 at the moments t1andt2. The radiation reaction force extracted this way is thus somehow averaged, and it does not reflect the instantaneous d amping force. In a first questionable step, from (29) the radiative reactio n force is extracted as: Frad=2 3q2 c3¨v (30) We have to warn that, since in (29) Fradis in scalar product with v, the only meaningful information that can be extracted is about the component of the force which is parall el to the velocity, ( Frad·v)v/v2! Another problem related to the expression (30) is that it is not clear whether the force is indeed a damping force, pointing in the opposite direction than the velocity. This problem is evide nt if we consider the ’runaway’ solution [10], in which the velocity, the acceleration and the acceleration’s deri vative are all parallel, pointing in the same direction, and increasing exponentially. In a second questionable step, the force from (30) is general ized [1,7,14] to the relativistic case by introducing the derivative with respect to the proper time, and by adding an e xtra term, specifically needed to ensure the orthogonality between the 4-force and the 4-velocity. The relativistic 4- force obtained this way is: Frad=2 3q2 c3[d3X dτ3+1 c2(d2X dτ2·d2X dτ2)dX dτ] (31) Since the only reason for being of the radiation reaction for ce is to account for the dissipation of energy, and this dissipation is accompanied by a decrease in the rest mass of t he system, and furthermore only the component of the force parallel to the velocity enters the equation, we can sa fely consider the radiation reaction 4-force as being paral lel to the 4-velocity. Therefore, there is no need for the last te rm in (31). By extracting, from the first term in (31), the component para llel to the 4-velocity, and by requiring that this force point in the opposite direction than the 4-velocity, we obta in: Frad=2 3q2 c3|d3X dτ3·dX dτ|1 −c2dX dτ(32) From (28) and (32) we can calculate the rate of energy dissipa tion: dE dt=−1 γ(v)(Frad·dX dτ) =−1 γ(v)2 3q2 c3|d3X dτ3·dX dτ|=−1 γ(v)2 3q2 c3|d2X dτ2·d2X dτ2| (33) In the nonrelativistic limit we recover the exact (not avera ged!) Larmor power formula: dE dt=−2 3q2 c3a2(34) Therefore we claim that (32) is the correct expression of the instantaneous radiation reaction force. VII. ON A MACROSCOPIC SCALE, THE 4-FORCE COMPONENT PARALLEL TO THE 4-VELOCITY CANCELS We now make the following conjecture: that the averaged electromagnetic 4-force (Lorentz force + radiative reacti on) is still orthogonal to the 4-velocity. Our conjecture is bas ed on the detailed analysis of a simple situation, shown in Figure 6. A source particle moves with uniform radial veloci ty up to a point A, where its velocity is changed, and the 6uniform radial motion continues afterwards. During this ti me a test particle is held at rest by other external forces that exactly cancel the 4-force due to the source particle. I t is evident that, before the point B or after the point D, the test particles ’sees’ a uniformly moving source, with no apparent change of velocity between the retarded and advanced positions. Therefore, only on the segment BD can th e electromagnetic 4-force have a component parallel to the 4-velocity of the test particle. We will calculate the to tal change of the rest mass (of the tension), on the segment BD, and we will show that there is no net change. For this, cons ider the interaction with the advanced source, as shown in Figure 7. A particle at point P will be subject to a rea l 4-force and to an imaginary 4-force, given in the proper reference frame of the source particle. Thus the tota l component parallel to the 4-velocity of the test particle will be: F/bardbl=iFcos(−α)− Fsin(α) =iFc√ c2−v2− Fiv√ c2−v2=iFγ(v)(1−v c) (35) The magnitude of the 4-force Fwill depend on the radial distance: PL=PKcos(α) = (PN+NK) cos( α) = (R+vt)γ(v) (36) and on the length ratio: F=1 2Qq (PL)2γ(v)(1 +v c) =1 2Qq γ(v)(R+vt)2(1 +v c) (37) The net parallel component (acting on a segment so) will be: F/bardbl=i1 2Qq (R+vt)2(1 +v c)(1−v c) (38) This force has to be integrated between B ( tB=−R/c) and D ( tD=R/c). /summationdisplay F/bardbl=/summationdisplayF/bardbl soso=/integraldisplayF/bardbl sods=ic so/integraldisplaytD tBF/bardbldt=iQq τoRc(39) Remarkably, this expression has no dependence on the veloci tyvof the source. A similar expression, but of a different sign, is obtained for the interaction with the retarded sour ce. The overall change of the rest mass (of the tension in the string) is zero! Thus only on a time scale of R/c, where Ris the distance between accelerated interacting charges, could someone hope to experimentally detect the variation o f the rest mass. An essential part of our treatment was the separation of char ges into test and source particles. Since even the problem of two particles interacting one with the other thro ugh retarded potentials is not tractable, it is hard to believe that our conjecture will ever become a theorem. VIII. THE VARIATION OF THE REST MASS IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE EQ UIVALENCE PRINCIPLE Consider an infinitesimal SpaceTime volume element, surrou nding an infinitesimal length element of a particle’s world-line. What happens if we bring a massive body, generat ing gravitation, in the proximity of our initial particle? The Riemann metric tensor of the space will change, modifyin g the volume, phenomenologically producing a change in the mass density of the volume element. In the above descri ption we have implicitly considered that the rest mass of the test particle remains constant. But it has to be realiz ed that we have no control over the mass of the particle! This mass cancels from the equations of motion, as a result of the equivalence p rinciple [16]: ”[...] the law of the equality of the inert and the gravitational mass is equivale nt to the assertion that the acceleration imparted to a body by a gravitational field is independent of the nature of t he body.” We can alternatively imagine the result of the process of bringing the massive body closer to our test pa rticle as being a change in the rest mass of the particle, while preserving the Minkowski metric, such that we end up wi th the same change of the mass density. We have also implicitly assumed that the linear charge densi ty is not changed during the variation of the linear rest mass density. This is because the electric charge is not corr elated with inertia, in contrast to mass and energy. Our assumption is also in qualitative agreement with experimen tal results from Particle Physics which indicate that the charge of a particle can take only a quantized value, while th e rest mass is not subject to such a restraint. 7IX. A THEORETICAL DERIVATION OF THE HOMOGENOUS MAXWELL’S EQ UATIONS USING THE RIEMANNIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACETIME We now generalize the relativistic Lorentz 4-force, such th at the radiation reaction be included into the field-strengt h tensor. We exploit the fact that any 4-force parallel to the 4 -velocity can be written as the contraction between a symmetric tensor and the 4-velocity. F(rad) α=2 3q2 c3|d3X dτ3·dX dτ|1 −c2δαβVβ=q cT(rad) αβVβ (40) Consider next two spacetime events, A and B, and a charged par ticle moving from A to B on any possible smooth path Γ, restricted only to the conditions that the initial an d final velocities be given. Since the direction of the final 4-momentum is given ab initio , and its magnitude is given by the rest mass (which is uniquely determined by the Riemann metric tensor at point B, following our analogy, and does not depend on the history of the test particle), we can conclude that the variation of the 4-momentum between A and B is the same regardless of the path followed. For two different paths, Γ 1and Γ 2, we can write PB−PA=/integraldisplay Γ1dP=/integraldisplay Γ2dP (41) The expression of the Lorentz 4-force Fα= (q/c)TαβVβallows us to write the integrals in (40) as the circulation of the field-strength tensor /integraldisplay ΓdPα=/integraldisplay ΓFαdτ=/integraldisplay Γq cTαβdXβ dτdτ=/integraldisplay Γq cTαβdXβ (42) By collecting the integrals in (41) on one side of the equatio n, we obtain that in general /contintegraldisplay Γq cTαβdXβ= 0⇒/contintegraldisplay ΓTαβdXβ= 0 (43) We now introduce Stokes Theorem for Minkowski-space tensor s [7], in a rather unused form [17]: /contintegraldisplay ΓTαβdXβ=1 2/integraldisplay d fβγ(∂Tαγ ∂Xβ−∂Tαβ ∂Xγ) (44) where d fβγare projections of a surface element. Due to the arbitrary na ture of the paths Γ 1and Γ 2, from equations (42)-(43) it follows that ∂Tαγ ∂Xβ−∂Tαβ ∂Xγ= 0 (45) This is the most general condition that the field-strength te nsor must satisfy. From (44) we can separate the symmetric and the antisymmetric components: ∂T(s) γα ∂Xβ−∂T(s) αβ ∂Xγ=∂T(a) γα ∂Xβ+∂T(a) αβ ∂Xγ(46) From (46) we obtain two more equations by cyclic permutation s of the indices ( α→β, β→γ, γ→α). By summing up the three equations thus obtained, the symmetric component s cancel, and we end up with the homogenous Maxwell’s equations: ∂T(a) αβ ∂Xγ+∂T(a) βγ ∂Xα+∂T(a) γα ∂Xβ= 0 (47) 8X. LOOSE ENDS The theory we have developed stresses the importance of the w orld-line of a particle, seen as a string in static equilibrium. How can this picture be reconciled with the Qua ntum Mechanics elimination of the concept of trajectory? An intuitive answer would be: by considering a vibrating string. This would of course require the introduction of a fifth dimension, which could be considered as ’the hidden par ameter’. Time and Space would no longer be treated on a different footing [18] (time as a parameter and position a s an operator), in complete agreement with Special Relativity. What is more, irreversibility could be introduced as an effec t of the ’collapsing of the wave-function’ resulted from performing a measurement. The human observer, the human con science, would thus be inherently recognized as extending into the fifth dimension. The speed ic, at which the human conscience is ’traveling’ in time, is to b e correlated with the velocity of a transverse wave in a string of linear mass density µo=mo/soand under a tension T=icP/so=i2c2mo/so: vtransverse wave =/radicalBigg T µo=ic (48) XI. CONCLUSIONS We have presented a series of intuitive arguments which sugg est that the world-line of a particle be considered as a string in static equilibrium. We have proposed a model of time symmetric action-at-a-distance electromagnetic interaction, which reduces to the classical theory in the ca se of uniformly moving particles. We have argued that the radiation reaction 4-force should be parallel to the 4-v elocity, and that the electromagnetic field-strength tenso r should have a symmetric part, which cancels upon averaging. The equivalence principle has allowed us to draw a parallel between our model and General Relativity, and we ha ve derived the homogenous Maxwell’s equations as a consequence of the Riemannian structure of SpaceTime. [1] Davies P C W, The Physics of Time Asymmetry (University of California Press, 1977) p.112 [2] Ritz W, Recherches critiques sur l’´ electrodynamique g ´ en´ erale, Ann.Chim.Phys. 13(1908) p.145 [Collected Works, p.317] [3] Dirac P A M, Classical theory of radiating electrons, Pro c.Roy.Soc.London A167 (1938) p.148 [4] Tetrode H, ¨Uber den Wirkungszusammenhang der Welt. Eine Erweiterung d er klassischen Dynamik., Zeits.f.Physik 10 (1922) p.317 [5] Wheeler J A and Feynman R P, Classical Electrodynamics in Terms of Direct Interparticle Action, Rev.Mod.Phys. 21 (1949) p.425 [6] Wheeler J A and Feynman R P, Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation, Rev.Mod.Phys. 17(1945) p.157 [7] Landau L and Lifchitz E, Th´ eorie du Champ (Moscow: Mir, 1966) p.68, 265, 30 [8] Weyl H, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science (Princeton University Press, 1949) p.116 [9] Galeriu C, Electromagnetic interaction between two uni formly moving charged particles: a geometrical derivation using Minkowski diagrams, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0 003008 [10] Jackson J D, Classical Electrodynamics (New York: Wiley, 1975) p.580, 783 [11] Minkowski H, Space and Time , reprinted in Einstein A, Lorentz H A, Weyl H and Minkowski H, The Principle of Relativity (Dover, 1952) p.73 [12] Rosser W G V, Classical Electromagnetism via Relativity (New York: Plenum Press, 1968) p.118 [13] Moon P, Spencer D E, Mirchandaney A S, Shama U, Mann P J, Th e Derivation of a New Gaussian Equation for the Force Between Moving Charges from Fundamental Postulates, Phys. Essays 12(1999) p.153 [14] Pauli W, Theory of relativity (Dover, 1981) p.106, 121, 99 [15] Abraham M, Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K¨ orper, R.C.C irc.mat.Palermo, 28(1909) p.1 [16] Einstein A, The Meaning of Relativity (Princeton University Press, 1955) p.57 [17] Synge J L, Schild A, Tensor Calculus (Dover, 1978) p.275 [18] de Broglie L, L’´ electron Magn´ etique (Paris: Hermann , 1934) p.301 9FIG. 1. The equations of motion for a material point particle (a) can be rewritten as the static equilibrium condition for a 4D string (b). FIG. 2. While in the instantaneous action model (a) the force is directed along the line connecting the interacting parti cles, this is no longer the case when we introduce the retardation t ime (b). However, a time symmetric interaction model (c) cou ld restore the initial intuitive situation. FIG. 3. Length ratios for a source particle (world-line FI) a t rest and a test particle (world-line AB) moving with radial velocity. FIG. 4. Length ratios for a source particle (world-line GJ) a t rest and a test particle (world-line OA) moving with arbitr ary velocity. FIG. 5. Calculated in the proper reference frame of the sourc e particle, the real and imaginary components of the advance d and retarded 4-forces add up to the relativistic Lorentz 4-f orce. FIG. 6. The variation of the rest mass takes place only on a tim e scale of R/c, where R is the distance between accelerated interacting charges. FIG. 7. The test particle is held at rest, at the origin, and th e source particle has a radial uniform motion, interrupted o nly at point A. The total variation of the rest mass of the test par ticle, along the segment BD, is zero. 10(a) (b) Fig. 1, Calin Galeriu, Time Symmetric Electrodynamicsx OictA BPPA PPBFFx O ictA B-TTA TTBf ds(a) (b) (c) Fig. 2, Calin Galeriu, Time Symmetric Electrodynamicsx Oictx O ictx O ictlight conelight cone world-line world-lineAB D C E F G H I−α Fig. 3, Calin Galeriu, Time Symmetric Electrodynamicspast futureFig. 4, Calin Galeriu, Time Symmetric Electrodynamicsxy ictOA C E F I J G Hworld-line world-lineBFig. 5, Calin Galeriu, Time Symmetric Electrodynamicspast future world-lineworld-line FFfuture,imagFFfuture,real FFpast,real FFpast,imag R i R i RFig. 6, Calin Galeriu, Time Symmetric ElectrodynamicsO ictx RA B C DEFFig. 7, Calin Galeriu, Time Symmetric ElectrodynamicsO ictx AF B D FiF PKLM -α αN

arXiv:physics/0005013v1 [physics.gen-ph] 5 May 2000Do The Particles With Nonzero Mass Need Duality ? Genrikh Bayatian Yerevan Physics Institute Alikhanian Brothers St. 2, Yerevan 375036 Armenia Abstract Unsufficiency of conditions for the formation of interferenc e in monoparticle ”which path” experiments is proven. The version of corpuscu lar interpretation of diffraction pattern based on the action discreteness is pr esented, which makes unnecessary to accredit duality to the particles with nonze ro mass. The experiment to check the above mentioned concepts are proposed. 1. Introduction. Interpreting all the ”which path” experimental data one usu ally proceeds from the fact that the observed irregularities at single microparti cle diffraction have interferencial origin in spite of the lack of strictly definitive experiment al evidence. The resemblance of diffraction pattern in multiphoton (classical optics) an d monophoton experiments may appear a scanty proof of interference presence in the latter case. It is an axiom that simultaneous arrival of at least two monoc hromatic and coherent waves to the observation point is an obligatory condition fo r the formation of interference. Observing no second wave in monophoton (monoparticle) expe riments and basing on the generally accepted understanding of the interferencial or igin of mentioned irregularities most of the researchers were forced to assume the interferen ce of a single particle (photon) with itself by its violent simultaneous pulling through bot h slits separated with spatial distance by several orders longer (by the order of 4 for the ex periments with atoms of helium [1]) than the transverse sizes of these particles. Me anwhile, the particles do not undergo fission: no loss of microparticle energy or photon fr equency is observed behind the slits. This paper shows that the registered irregularities in mono particle (monophoton) ”which path” experiments may not have interferencial origi n due to the insufficicency 1conditions for the interference realization (two waves as m inimum). This is why the at- tempts to interpret diffraction pattern in monophoton (mono particle) experiments using interference (maybe only seeming) bring to well-known logi cal contradictions or, according Feynman, to a puzzle [2]. In order to discover a logical hitch and to provide obligator y conditions for the in- terference we are forced using superposition principle and diffraction grating to fission a single photon into two ones [3], ignoring the law of conserv ation of energy and other quantum numbers (lepton and hadron numbers in case of diffrac tion of electrons, nucleons and nuclei). The only one way out of this logical deadlock is may seem to wit hdraw seeming interference because of scanty conditions for its realizat ion in the monoparticle ”which path” experiments and to search for new mechanisms of origin of detected irregularities from the corpuscular point of view by analogy to photo- and Co mpton-effects, when one has to use corpuscular representations, although nobody do ubts in the wave properties of photons. 2. The version of corpuscular interpretation. In our recent publication [3] a brief description of this int erpretation is given. Due to the importance of the problem we are giving below more detail ed presentation. In the diffraction experiments the corpuscular-field intera ctions of microparticles with matter of grating are not taken into account. Only the wave-d iffractional aspects are regarded. Such approach is acceptable in the classical opti cs, where out of a huge flux of photons simultaneously dropping on the diffraction grating , two or more photons will ap- pear, which passed through the different slits. Meeting each other they will interfere here among themselves. Although in this case the mechanism of lig ht beam deflection from the initial direction is not clear enough without accountin g of Huygens-Fresnel approx- imate model, which should be corrected in the light of corpus cular presentation. Quite different situation is observed, when a single photon, which may interfere only with itself (a puzzle!) [2] falls on two slits with b≫λ(bis the distance between the slits and λis the length of photon wave). In order to understand why the corpuscular-field interpreta tion is the only correct 2way out to solve the puzzle we shall present the experimental results. The possibility of diffractional scattering of electrons and neutrons with the identical de Broglie wave lengths at one and the same crystal differs by the order of ∼7 to the electrons. The electron interacts with the crystal through Coulomb field, while the n eutron - mainly through the short-range nuclear forces. Such substantial differenc e at the same λ/bproportions shows the dominant importance of corpuscular-field interac tions as compared with the wave-diffractional ones. The account of microparticle interaction with the grating m atter becomes more simple, if we accept the action multiplicity from the Planck constan t (h) for the non-bound states as well. This hypothesis has no heuristical value. It is used for a long time in non- explicit form in theoretical analysis of microparticle sca ttering angular distribution using the method of partial waves [4] in the form of discreteness an gular momentum having dimension of action. The discrete behaviour of the action is natural because of th e fact, that the non-bound state may differ in principle from its analogue in bound state in as less ”surplus” as the kinetic energy. The nature is hardly arranged in the manner, when, e.g. at Coulomb interaction of electron with proton in hydrogen atoms the ac tion is quantized, while at Coulomb scattering of the same particles one over another ne ar to kinematic region of hydrogen atoms the action will not be quantized. Let a parallel beam of microparticles with Pmomentum falls on the crystal with bperiod and as a result of elastic scattering obtains Prtransverse momentum. The scattering angle θis determined by the relation Psinθ=Pr. (1) It is necessary to find out Prfrom the following differential equation d/vectorPr=/vectorFrdt (2) where Fris the force acting on the particle from the crystal in the dir ection perpendicular to the beam. Scalaraly multiplying [2] by d/vector rof path in /vectorFrdirection we shall receive d/vectorPr·d/vector r=/vectorFr·d/vector r·dt=dSr(r, t) (3) 3where dSr- is the action in /vectorFrdirection of path d/vector rindttime period. In order to receive complete action during ttime when the particle is in crystal it is necessary to define the integration limits of randtvariables. Choosing the limits for r from 0 to band for the time period from 0 to tthe equation (3) may be rewritten as /integraldisplayt 0dPr/integraldisplayb 0dr=/integraldisplayt 0/integraldisplayb 0dSr(r, t) (4) With the account that the right side is the complete action an d, as we suppose, should be equal to the multiple of Planck constant h, we may have Pr·b=nh (5) If we substitute from here the value Prin (1), we shall receive b·sinθ=n·h/P=nλ (6) where λ=h/P. The formula (6) shows, that the quantitative agreement wit h de Broglie hypothesis observed in the experiment is not accidental. Th e de Broglie hypothesis con- tains in a latent form our hypothesis [3] about the action dis creteness of hin all types of interactions. Due to the latter fact, as it may be seen from (6), the diffraction scat- tering angles θobtain discrete values, imitating interferencial pattern . The corpuscular- field interpretation, which leads to the same quantitative r esults as the de Broglie wave diffractional representations, allows to avoid generally k nown logical difficulties [2] at the interpretation of the diffractional pattern. This removes t he discussed contradictions [3] of the superposition principle to the assumption of interfere nce in the monoparticle ”which path” experiments. This principle is apparently is not acce ptable in the case of alternative and mutually transitional in time states, such as the transi tion of a single particle either through the first or the second slit. Such events are unable to interfere due to the absence of partner. The composition of their probability amplitude s is impossible, because they will compose the mixture combination of the probabilities. 3. Expected experimental evidences. 3.1. The analysis of existing experiments. In [3] we have proposed the real version of two slit Young type experiment [1], capa- ble to give the conclusive description of the effect of open sl it, that has not passed by 4microparticle, on its behaviour. It is proposed to compare t he diffraction pattern of two open slits with a total picture, when either one or another sl it opens in its turn. In the total exposure the interference must not appear by definitio n. It is easy to propose that under b≫λconditions the pattern with two open slits will be identical to the total picture, as far as the single microp article will pass through one of two slits, while the other slit, which is not passed, may be at that moment considered as closed. Hence, the interference should be not possible at tw o slits either in the experiments with single particles. While the irregulations observed in [1, 5, 6] may be interpreted by the formula (6). However, this does not mean that the experim ent should not be done. It will finally prove what is correct. 3.2. New possible experiments. In order to prove the impossibility of a single microparticl e transit through two slits (and therefore the impossibility of interference) we propo se the experiment based on the Young scheme (or its analogy). Let us dispose detectors one b y one after each slit and direct their signals to the coincidence scheme. The absence of coincidence signals will evidence of the impossibility of simultaneous passing of a s ingle particle through the both slits, while the existence of such signals will prove the opp osite concept. Let us discuss the scheme of one more experiment. The paralle l beam of coherent photons using semitransparent mirror is fissioned into two p arts: reflected and transmitted ones. Arranging the meeting of these two parts we shall see th e interferencial picture. Then using the optical filter we create out of multiphoton bea m a single photon beam withtm≪tcparameters, where tmis a mean time interval between neighbour photons andtcis the train duration. In this case there will be no interfere nce, because the photons will enter the observation zone at different times. This one and two slit Young type experiments have the same ori gin. In both cases the photon has two possible unpredictable paths. The advantage of such version, based on the absence of the interference imitation conditioned on formu la (6), will serve as a touchstone for the corpuscular interpretation [3] of diffraction patte rn, in contrast to the previous tests, when only the legitimacy (correctness) of the wave re presentations (interpretations) could be resolved. 5Conclusion. The causality principle excludes the emergence of interfer ence in the single particle (monophoton) ”which path” experiments. Proceeding from th is it is impossible to inter- pret the irregularities observed in these experiments usin g wave representations. They are likely to be connected with the discreteness of action an d for non-bound states. The experiment according the described schemes are necessa ry in order to prove the correctness of the proposed fundamental statement togethe r with corpuscular interpreta- tion. Acknowledgments. It is a pleasure to thank Professor E.Mamidjanian for useful discussions. References [1] O.Carnal and J.Mlynek. Phys.Rev.Lett., 66, 2689 (1991) . [2] R.Feynman, R.Leighton and M.Sands. The Feynman Lecture s on Physics (MA. 1965), vol. 3, h. 37, par. 5-7. [3] G.L.Bayatian. E-preprint physics/9906024 (1999). [4] L.J.Schiff. Quantum Mechanic S., par. 19, N.-Y.-T.-L. (1 955). [5] D.W.Keith, C.R.Estrom et al. Phys.Rev.Lett., 66, 2693 ( 1991). [6] M.S.Chapman et al. Phys.Rev.Lett., 75, 3783 (1995). [7] Markis Arndt et al. Nature, 401, 680 (1999). 6

arXiv:physics/0005014v1 [physics.atom-ph] 5 May 2000Multi frequency evaporative cooling to BEC in a high magneti c field. V. Boyer, S. Murdoch, Y. Le Coq, G. Delannoy, P. Bouyer, A. Asp ect Groupe d’Optique Atomique Laboratoire Charles Fabry de l’I nstitut d’Optique, UMRA 8501 du CNRS, Bˆ at. 503, Campus universitaire d’Orsay, B.P. 147, F-91403 ORSAY CEDEX, FRANCE Abstract We demonstrate a way to circumvent the interruption of evapo rative cooling observed at high bias field for87Rb atoms trapped in the ( F= 2,m= +2) ground state. Our scheme uses a 3-frequencies-RF-knife ach ieved by mixing two RF frequencies. This compensates part of the non lineari ty of the Zee- man effect, allowing us to achieve BEC where standard 1-frequ ency-RF-knife evaporation method did not work. We are able to get efficient ev aporative cooling, provided that the residual detuning between the tr ansition and the RF frequencies in our scheme is smaller than the power broade ning of the RF transitions at the end of the evaporation ramp. Forced evaporative cooling of atoms in a magnetic trap is at t he moment the only known way to achieve Bose-Einstein condensation [1–3]. Particle s with energy significantly larger than the average thermal energy are removed from the trap and the remaining ones thermal- ize to a lower temperature by elastic collisions. For that, a n oscillating magnetic field is used to induce a multi-photon transition from a trapping state to a non-trapping state via all intermediate Zeeman sublevels. Atoms moving in the trap wit h sufficient energy can reach the resonance point (RF knife) and exit the trap. If the RF-fr equency is decreased slowly enough, and no other process is hampering the forced-evapor ation, the increase of the phase 1space density obtained by this method eventually leads to Bo se-Einstein condensation. In a previous publication [4], we reported that RF forced eva porative cooling of87Rb atoms in the ( F= 2, m= +2) ground state in a magnetic trap with a high bias field is hindered and eventually interrupted. Our interpretation o f this phenomenon is based on the non-linear terms of the Zeeman effect that lift the degene racy of transition frequencies between adjacent Zeeman sublevels. This interpretation is supported by numerical calcula- tions [5]. Interrupted evaporative cooling in a large magne tic field is a serious problem in several situations, interesting for practical reasons - li ke the use of permanent magnets [6] or of an iron core electromagnet as the one described in [7]. H igh magnetic field evapora- tion is also important in connection with Feschbach resonan ces [8–11]. In this paper, we demonstrate that it is possible to achieve efficient evaporat ive cooling in a high magnetic field, by use of a multi-frequency RF knife allowing a multi-p hoton transition to take place across non equidistant levels. We show that, for our range of magnetic fields, it is possible to use a simple experimental scheme where the three required frequencies are obtained by RF frequency mixing yielding a carrier and two sidebands. Our high bias field magnetic trap follows the Ioffe-Pritchard scheme. In this scheme, the magnetic field modulus has a 3D quadratic dependence allowin g trapping, plus a bias field B0: B=B0+/parenleftBiggG2 2B0−C 2/parenrightBigg/parenleftBig x2+y2/parenrightBig +Cz2. (1) We focus in this paper on87Rb in the F= 2 manifold of the electronic ground state. Atoms are initially trapped in the m= +2 state. Our bias field B0is between 50 and 200 Gauss. This is much larger than in most other experiments where B0can be independently adjusted, and is set typically at 1 Gauss [12]. In a large magnetic field, the non linear terms are not negligible in the Zeeman shifts given by the Breit-Rabi form ula Em(B) =mgIµnB+¯hωHF 2/parenleftbigg/radicalBig 1 +mξ+ξ2−1/parenrightbigg (2) with 2ξ=(gSµB+gIµn)B ¯hωHF. HeregS≃2.002 and gI≃1 are respectively the Land´ e factor for the electron and the nucleus, µBandµnare the Bohr magneton and the nucleus magneton, and ωHF(2π×6834.7 MHz) is the hyperfine splitting. Compared to the low magnetic field case [13,14], the evaporat ion process changes drasti- cally. At a given magnetic field, the spacings between adjace nt sublevels ( |∆m|= 1) are not equal and the direct multi-photon transition from trapping to non-trapping states becomes negligible. Evaporation of hot atoms can only happen via a se quence of one-photon transi- tions of limited efficiency (see fig. 8 in [15]) separated in spa ce. This results in long lasting atoms in the m= +1 and m= 0 states [16] responsible for hindered evaporative coolin g. Moreover, transitions to non-trapping states are suppress ed at the end of the evaporation ramp, leading to an interruption of cooling before BEC is rea ched. To overcome these limitations, 3 distinct RF fields can be use d to induce a direct three photon transition from the m= +2 trapping state to the m=−1 non trapping state. At a magnetic field B, the three RF frequencies must match the transition frequen cies defined by: ω0−δω′ 0= (E2−E1)/¯h ω0= (E1−E0)/¯h (3) ω0+δω0= (E0−E−1)/¯h withEmtaken from eq.(2). Fig. 1 represents all possible transitions induced by these three RF frequencies in the magnetic field defined in eq.(1). At position K, each RF field is resonant with a given transition : the smallest RF frequency with the ( m= +2) →(m= +1) transition, the intermediate frequency with the ( m= +1) →(m= 0) transition, and the largest frequency with the ( m= 0)→(m=−1) transition; this is where the 3-photon transition occurs . Because of the ordering of the three RF frequencies, the poin ts where one-photon transitions 3can be induced from m= +2 to m= +1 by the two larger frequencies are located beyond K(the multi-photon knife). Consequently, during the evapor ation, hot atoms will first encounter the three photon knife and be expelled from the tra p, provided that the RF power is large enough to enable efficient multi-photon adiaba tic passage to the non-trapping statem=−1. The discussion above shows that in principle, the multi-fre quency evaporation requires a synchronized non trivial sweep of three different frequenci es in the 100 MHz range, with an accuracy of a few kHz (see below). We have rather implemented a simplified scheme where the three frequencies are obtained by mixing a carrier at fre quency ωRFwith a smaller frequency δωRF. We then obtain 3 equally spaced radiofrequency fields : ωRF−δωRF,ωRF, ωRF+δωRF, of approximately the same power (as checked with a spectrum analyzer). Since in general δω0andδω′ 0are slightly different, the RF frequencies will not exactly m atch the transition frequencies of eq.(3). Nonetheless, they compe nsate the second order (quadratic) term of the Zeeman shift, and should work under certain condi tion discussed hereafter. At the position where the three-photon transition is resona nt, the carrier frequency ωRF will verify 3ω0+δω0−δω′ 0= 3ωRF (4) but there will be a residual detuning for each one photon step of the multi-photon transition. For example, the optimum δωRFthat maximizes the multi-photon transition probability wi ll be δωRF=δω0+δω′ 0 2(5) and the residual detunings for each intermediate steps of th e three photons transition are both equal to ∆ =δω0−δω′ 0 6. (6) If the Rabi frequency Ω RFassociated with each one photon transition is significantly larger than the residual detuning ∆, the multi-photon transition i s quasi resonant in the interme- 4diate levels, leading to an effective Rabi frequency Ω eff∝ΩRF. If on the other hand Ω RFis smaller than ∆, the effective Rabi frequency is Ωeff∝Ω3 RF ∆2(7) and the multi-photon transition is inefficient for evaporati on ; we are then in the scheme of hindered and interrupted evaporation. We therefore expect that our scheme will be efficient for small enough magnetic field when the residual detuning ∆ i s smaller than the one-photon Rabi frequency Ω RF. Table I gives the values of the Zeeman shifts for various magn etic fields and the difference δω0−δω′ 0. For the RF power used in this scheme, the one photon Rabi freq uency Ω RFis of the order of 10 kHz, and the discussion above shows that our si mplified 3-knives evaporation scheme should work for magnetic fields significantly less tha n a hundred Gauss. This is what we observe. It is impossible to achieve BEC in bias fields of 20 7 Gauss and 110 Gauss, but BEC is obtained in a trap with a bias field of 56 Gauss, by using a n appropriate sideband splitting δωRFkept constant while ramping down the carrier frequency ωRF. Figure 2 shows the effect of the sideband splitting δωRFat a bias field value of 56 Gauss. We have plotted the number of condensed atoms as a function of δωRF, all other parameters being kept unchanged. This is a good indication of the efficien cy of the evaporation. The curve shows a maximum at δωRF= 2π×0.45 MHz. This value verifies equation (5) for a magnetic field of 56.6 Gauss. This magnetic field correspond s to the position of the RF knife at the end of the ramp. We conclude that frequency match ing is mostly important in the last part of the radiofrequency ramp. The width of the cur ve is about 10 kHz (HWHM) which corresponds to power broadening [17]. Table II report experimental data, showing quantitatively the efficiency of our simplified 3-knives scheme, without which BEC could not be obtained at 5 6 Gauss. It is interesting to note that even when the magnetic field is too large to allow our simplified 3-knives scheme to reach BEC, it is nevertheless more efficient than a simple 1- frequency knife, since it allows us to reach a significantly lower temperature. It is al so remarkable that an efficient 5evaporation was obtained at a bias field of 56 Gauss, since the beginning of the evaporation takes place in a larger magnetic field (of the order of 200 Gaus s) where the condition (5) does not hold, and the detuning of the intermediate one photo n transitions is much larger than the Rabi frequency Ω RF. Although it has not been much noticed, a similar situation is encountered in most BEC experiments (using 1-frequency k nife evaporation) : the non linear Zeeman effect at the beginning of the evaporation is of ten much larger than the Rabi frequency, and the evaporation hampering described in [4] i s certainly happening then. The success of these experiments as well as of our 3-frequencies scheme shows that whether the evaporation is hindered or not only matters at the end of t he evaporation ramp. To understand qualitatively this observation, we can note tha t the heating induced by the atoms populating the intermediate levels should not vary drastic ally with the temperature of the cooled cloud. At the beginning of the evaporation, i.e. “hig h” temperatures, the relative heating stays negligible [18]. Close to the end, i.e. “low” t emperature, when heating should give rise to hampered evaporative cooling, evaporation is f ully efficient and the intermediate levels are completely depleted. This could explain the succ ess of BEC experiments. To verify these assumptions, more theoretical work, for insta nce in the spirit of [5], is needed. In conclusion, we have demonstrated a scheme to circumvent t he hindrance and inter- ruption of evaporative cooling in the presence of non linear Zeeman effect. We implement a 3-frequency evaporative knife by a modulation of the RF field , yielding two sidebands. This scheme allows us to obtain BEC of87Rb atoms in the ( F= 2, m= +2) ground state in a bias field of 56 Gauss, where the standard 1-frequency RF evap oration scheme fails. Our observations also support the physical ideas presented in o ur previous work to explain the hindrance and interruption of evaporative cooling in a high magnetic field, as well as the qualitative discussions of this paper. The success of this simplified scheme and the complementary o bservations reported in this paper, indicate that a more sophisticated multi-frequ ency evaporation scheme should work at larger bias field, provided that the resonance in the i ntermediate steps of the multi- photon transition is achieved within the Rabi frequency of t he one photon transitions, at 6the end of the evaporative ramp. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank S. Rangwala for helpfull discussions and M . L´ ecrivain for the elabora- tion of the iron-core electromagnet. This work is supported by CNRS, MENRT, R´ egion Ile de France, DGA and the European Community. SM acknowledges s upport from Minist` ere des Affaires ´Etrang` eres. YLC acknowledges support from DGA. 7FIGURES Position in the trap (a. u .) Energy (a. u .) K FIG. 1. Implementation of 3-RF-knife to evaporate in a high m agnetic field. All possible transitions are represented. Evaporation happens at Kvia a 3-photon-transition resonant in the intermediate states. 81.2 0.8 0.4 0.0N ( 105 ) 0.50 0.48 0.46 0.44 0.42 0.40 δω /K20/K2F/K32π ( /K4D/K48/K7A/K29 0 RF FIG. 2. Bose Einstein condensation with 3 RF knives : number o f atoms in the condensate versus the sideband frequency δωRF. The width of the curve is of the order of the Rabi frequency of a one-photon RF transition. 9TABLES B(Gauss) 56 110 207 ω0−δω′ 0(2π×MHz) 39.058-0.434 76.255-1.621 141.800-5.398 ω0(2π×MHz) 39.058 76.255 141.800 ω0+δω0(2π×MHz) 39.058+0.449 76.255+1.732 141.800+6.096 δω0−δω′ 0(2π×kHz) 15 111 698 TABLE I. Zeeman effect for different magnetic fields, calculat ed from the Breit-Rabi formula. B0(Gauss) 56 110 207 T1knife(µK) 10 50 100 T3knives (µK) 0.1 0.5 15 nλ3 3knives >2.612 0.1 10−3 TABLE II. Experimental results : lowest temperature achiev able with and without side band activated, and highest phase space density achieved for diff erent bias field. At a bias field of 56 Gauss, our 3-frequency scheme yields BEC, while a single f requency scheme fails because of interrupted evaporative cooling 10REFERENCES [1] M.H. Anderson, J.R. Ensher, M.R. Matthews, C.E. Wieman, E.A. Cornell, Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor , Science 269, 198 (1995) [2] C.C. Bradley, C.A. Sackett, J.J. Tollett, R.G. Hulet, Evidence of Bose-Einstein Con- densation in an Atomic Gas with Attractive Interactions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1687 (1995) ; C.C Bradley et al.,Bose Einstein Condensation of Lithium : Observation of Limited Condensate Number , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 985 (1997) [3] K.B. Davis, M.-O. Mewes, M.R. Andrews, N.J. van Druten, D .S. Durfee, D.M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms , Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3969 (1995) [4] B. Desruelle, V. Boyer, S.G. Murdoch, G. Delannoy, P. Bou yer, and A. Aspect, Inter- rupted evaporative cooling of87Rb atoms trapped in a high magnetic field , Phys. Rev. A 60, R1759 (1999) [5] O.H. Pakarinen and K.-A. Suominen Atomic dynamics in evaporative cooling of trapped alkali atoms in strong magnetic field e-print physics/9910043 (1999) [6] J.J. Tollett, C.C. Bradley, C.A. Sackett, and R.G. Hulet ,Permanent magnet trap for cold atoms , Phys. Rev. A 51, R22 (1995) [7] B. Desruelle, V. Boyer, P. Bouyer, G. Birkl, M. L´ ecrivai n, F. Alves, C.I. Westbrook, and A. Aspect, Trapping cold neutral atoms with an iron-core electromagne t, Eur. Phys. J. D1, 255 (1998) [8] J. Stenger, S. Inouye, M. R. Andrews, H.-J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Strongly Enhanced Inelastic Collisions in a Bose-Einstein Condensate near Feshbach Resonances , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2422 (1999) [9] Vladan Vuletic, Andrew J. Kerman, Cheng Chin, and Steven Chu,Observation of Low- 11Field Feshbach Resonances in Collisions of Cesium Atoms , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1406 (1999) [10] Ph. Courteille, R. S. Freeland, D. J. Heinzen, F. A. van A beelen and B. J. Verhaar, Observation of a Feshbach Resonance in Cold Atom Scattering , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 69 (1998) [11] C. Wieman : Condensation of85Rb using Feschbach resonance, private communication. [12] Note however that in TOP traps the bias field often exceed s 10 Gauss, and hindered cooling may play a role, specially when the atomic ground sta te hyperfine splitting is relatively small as in sodium for example. [13] W. Ketterle and N.J. Druten Advances in Atomic, Molecul ar and Optics Physics 37 (1996) edited by B. Bederson and H.Walther [14] O.J. Luiten, M.W. Reynolds, and J.T.M. Walraven, Kinetic theory of evaporative cooling of a trapped gas , Phys. Rev. A 53, 381 (1996) ; J. Walraven Quantum dynamics of simple systems , Proceedings of the 44thScottish University Summer School in Physics, Stirling (1996) [15] P. Bouyer, V. Boyer, S.G. Murdoch, G. Delannoy, Y. Le Coq , A. Aspect, M. Lecrivain, RF-induced evaporative cooling and BEC in a high magnetic fie ld, Proceedings of the 27thInternational School of quantum electronics “Bose-Einste in Condensation and Atom Lasers” (1999) ; e-print physics/0003050 [16] The m= 0 state is a trapping state in this manifold because of the no n linearity of the Zeeman effect. [17] This conclusion was corroborated by a calculation of th e energies of the dressed states for a given set {ΩRF, ωRF, δωRF}. From the calculated energy splitting C≃Ωeffat the (m= +2, m=−1) level crossing, we used the two-levels Landau Zener proba bility that the atoms will follow an adiabatic transition. We verified th at for small Rabi frequencies 12(i.e. small evaporation efficiency), as in our experiment, th is 3-photon transition is the most probable transition at any sideband detuning δωRF. This numerical calculation can be used to fit the experimental data. We can estimate the one-p hoton Rabi frequency ΩRF= 2π×8±4 kHz. [18] Except maybe for the case of destructive energy releasi ng collisions as in23Na. See P.S. Julienne, F.H. Mies, E. Tiesinga, and C.J. Williams, Phys. R ev. Lett, 78, 1880 (1997) 13

arXiv:physics/0005015v1 [physics.optics] 5 May 2000Frequency stabilization of a monolithic Nd:YAG ring laser b y controlling the power of the laser-diode pump source B. Willke , S. Brozek, and K. Danzmann Institut f¨ ur Atom- und Molek¨ ulphysik, Universit¨ at Hann over, Callinstr. 38, D–30167 Hannover Max-Planck-Institut f¨ ur Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann -Str. 1, D–85748 Garching, Germany V. Quetschke, and S. Gossler Institut f¨ ur Atom- und Molek¨ ulphysik, Universit¨ at Hann over, Callinstr. 38, D–30167 Hannover , Germany accepted for publication in Opt. Lett. April 26, 2000 Abstract The frequency of a 700mW monolithic non-planar Nd:YAG ring laser (NPRO) depends with a large cou- pling coefficient (some MHz /mW) on the power of its laser-diode pump source. Using this effect we demon- strate the frequency stabilization of an NPRO to a fre- quency reference by feeding back to the current of its pump diodes. We achieved an error point frequency noise smaller than 1 mHz /√ Hz, and simultaneously a reduction of the power noise of the NPRO by 10dB without an additional power stabilization feed-back system. Due to the demanding requirements of recent experi- ments in quantum optics, laser spectroscopy and laser metrology there has been much interest in laser stabi- lization over the last years. Although very good stabil- ity was achieved with Ar+lasers1, diode-laser pumped solid-state lasers were chosen for almost all modern high- precision experiments. The reason for this choice is that the free-running frequency noise of these lasers is 2 to 3 orders of magnitude smaller than for Ar+lasers, and the intensity noise of solid-states-laser is also much lower. Furthermore, solid-state lasers have a very high electrical-to-optical efficiency, which is important espe- cially in space applications like inter-satellite communi - cation or high power applications as laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors. Many of these experiments rely on the high in- trinsic stability of Nd:YAG non-planar ring oscillators (NPRO)2, the output of which is used in the experiment directly or is amplified either by injection locking3–5 or in a configuration with master oscillator and power amplifier6. The free-running frequency noise spectral density of NPROs is of the order of 1 kHz /√ Hz at 10 Hz and falls like 1 /fat higher frequencies. The unstabilized power noise of such lasers has a level of 10−7/√ Hz. Al-though this intrinsic stability is quite high, experiments like gravitational wave detectors require a frequency sta- bility in the mHz /√ Hz range, and simultaneously the power noise needs to be reduced by at least an order of magnitude. The commonly used schemes to reduce the frequency noise of NPROs rely on stabilizing the laser frequency to a fixed-spacer reference cavity or an atomic resonance by feeding back to two different actuators: the tempera- ture of the Nd:YAG crystal in the low Fourier frequency range below 1 Hz, and for higher frequencies to a piezo- electrical transducer (PZT) mounted on top of the crys- tal that changes the laser frequency due to stress-induced birefringence. The resonances of the PZT above 100kHz limit the useful bandwidth of the latter actuator. Good results were achieved especially by using an additional external phase shifter (Pockels cell) as a fast actuator to increase the unity gain frequency of the feed-back con- trol loop up to 1 MHz. For example Bondu et al.7report a frequency noise spectral density below 10−4Hz/√ Hz with respect to the reference cavity (in-loop) and in the order of 10−2Hz/√ Hz with respect to an independent cavity (out-of-loop). Although these results already meet the demanding requirements of first generation gravitational wave de- tectors, no attention was paid to the power noise and spatial beam fluctuations. Currently performed cross coupling measurements8predict a non-negligible point- ing and also power noise introduced by feeding a sig- nal to the NPRO’s PZT. Furthermore, care has to be taken that residual amplitude modulation of the phase- correcting Pockels cell does not compromize the shot noise limited performance of the NPRO in the frequency range above 5 MHz, which is essential for the hetero- dyne detection scheme used in many experiments. On the other hand the power stabilization scheme normally employed adds a signal to the current of the pump source of the NPRO, which has the undesired effect of changing the NPRO frequency. These problems together with the understanding of the fact that the free-running frequency noise of the NPRO is mainly due to power fluctuations 1of the laser-diode pump source9led us towards the new stabilization scheme. (A related scheme with a separate heating laser was used by Heilmann et al.10to stabilize a twisted-mode-cavity laser.) Figure 1 shows a sketch of the experimental setup. A 700mW NPRO built by Laser Zentrum Hannover was mode-matched to a high-finesse fixed-spacer ring cav- ity made from ultra-low-expansion material (ULE). This resonator has a finesse of 58000 and is put in a vacuum tank to avoid contamination and acoustic disturbances. φ810 nm1064nmbeam splitter to experiment electro-optical modulator (EOM) vacuum vesselphotodiode mixercontrol filterphase shifterdiode laser pump moduleNd:YAG laser oscillator reference cavity Fig. 1. Schematic of the experimental setup. An NPRO is stabilized to a rigid-spacer reference cavity by using th e Pound-Drever-Hall scheme to achieve an error signal for the control loop feeding back to the current of the NPRO’s pump diode. Before entering the cavity the light passes through a Faraday isolator to avoid back-reflections of the light into the laser and is transmitted through an electro- optical modulator (EOM). The EOM was driven by an rf-oscillator at ωmod= 29 MHz to produce phase modu- lation sidebands on the light. Once the laser frequency ωLis near a resonance ωCof the cavity, an asymme- try between these sidebands and the reflected carrier produces an amplitude modulation of the light at ωmod which then, detected by an InGaAs photodiode and de- modulated at ωmod, gives an error signal for the fre- quency stabilization servo system. A phase shifter be- tween the rf-oscillator and mixer is used in this well es- tablished Pound-Drever-Hall locking scheme11to opti- mize the slope of the frequency error signal. To measure the transfer function Tcur→ωbetween a signal added to the current of the pump diodes and the frequency of the NPRO we first locked the laser to the reference cavity using the conventional method of feeding the filtered error signal back to the PZT frequency actu- ator of the NPRO. The gain of this feed-back loop was reduced to give a unity gain frequency of only 100Hz. This servo was necessary to keep the laser frequency within the central part of the cavity linewidth, as onlyunder this condition the Pound-Drever-Hall error signal is proportional to the difference frequency δω=ωL−ωC between laser and cavity resonance. To measure Tcur→ω, which is shown in Figure 2, we summed the source sig- nal of a network analyzer with Fourier frequency above the unity gain frequency of the servo to the laser-diode pump-current and measured the change of the laser fre- quency at the error point of the Pound-Drever-Hall cir- cuit. 101102103104105106 frequency [Hz]10−510−410−310−210−1100101transfer function [MHz/mA] Fig. 2. Transfer function Tcur→ωof a signal summed to the current of the NPRO’s pump diode and the NPRO fre- quency. Power fluctuations of the pump diodes together with this strong coupling are responsible for the free-running l aser frequency noise and allows the frequency stabilization of a n NPRO by changing the power of its pump source. According to a model by Day et al.9this coupling is due to thermally induced changes of the optical path length in the laser crystal. By calculating the optical path length change of a typical NPRO crystal due to sinusoidial power fluctuations of its pump diode, Day et al. were able to model the transfer function Tcur→ω with good agreement to the experimental result between 100Hz and 100kHz. Furthermore by assuming a flat spectral density of the power fluctuations of the pump LDs their model was able to predict the free-running frequency fluctuations of the NPRO. Our measurements in Figure 2 shows Tcur→ωto Fourier frequencies up to 1MHz, and particularly in the frequency range of the NPRO’s relaxation oscillation frequency. It is worth mentioning that the power fluctuations of the pump LD which drive the relaxation oscillations cause a resonant response not only in the NPRO power but also in its frequency. This is clearly not a thermal effect but prob- ably due to changes in the index of refraction caused by oscillations in the atomic polarization of the active laser medium. 2Based on this transfer function we designed a control system to lock the laser frequency ωLto the cavity res- onance ωCby feeding back to the pump LD current. Figure 3 shows the spectral density of frequency fluctu- ations δω=ωL−ωC. 102103104105 frequency [Hz]10−510−410−310−210−1100101102103104frequency noise spectral density [Hz/(Hz1/2)] Fig. 3. Frequency noise spectral density of the mono- lithic Nd:YAG laser relative to a rigid-spacer reference ca vity. The upper curve shows the free running noise and the middle curve is a measurement taken at the error point of a feedback loop that stabilizes the laser frequency by feeding back to t he current driving its laser-diode pump source. The lower curv e represents the electronic noise of the measurements. The upper curve shows the free-running frequency noise of the NPRO and the lower curve was measured at the error point of the closed frequency stabilization loop. The bandwidth of this control system was 80kHz and the frequency fluctuations could be reduced to below 10 mHz /√ Hz for Fourier frequencies below 2kHz, which is comparable to the noise reduction we could achieve with a conventional split control loop feeding back to the laser PZT and also a phase correcting Pockels cell behind the laser. Due to the coupling between the laser frequency and the power of the LD pump source, the frequency mea- surement simultaneously measures the power fluctua- tions of the pump LD integrated over the spatial profile of the laser gain. Therefore this frequency servo simul- taneously reduces the power noise of the NPRO. Fig- ure 4 shows the power noise with and without frequency servo closed. Although the noise is reduced significantly, there is less noise reduction than the servo-system gain would suggest. This is probably due to the fact that the spatial overlap between the laser volume and the pump volume is not perfect. This means that a fraction of the absorbed pump-light can deposit heat in the Nd:YAG crystal but does not change the gain in the laser vol- ume. Hence fluctuations of this pump light may causefrequency fluctuations by changing the index of refrac- tion of the crystal but do not change the laser power. As the spatial distribution of the power fluctuations is not constant over the beam profile of the laser-diode bar, the correlation between the power and frequency fluctu- ations of the NPRO caused by pump-power fluctuations is not perfect. 103104105 frequency [Hz]10−910−810−710−610−5power noise spectral density [Hz−1/2] Fig. 4. Spectral density of the power fluctuations of a monolithic Nd:YAG laser. The upper curve (at low Fourier frequencies) shows the noise of the unstabilized laser and t he middle curve was measured while the laser frequency was stabilized using the current lock. Both measurements were taken without any dedicated active intensity stabilizatio n. The lower straight line corresponds to the shot noise limit o f this measurement. To summarize: we have introduced a new scheme to stabilize the frequency of an NPRO laser which only uses the built-in laser-diode current actuator. One advan- tage of this method in comparison with the conventional scheme is the much simpler controller needed. Only low voltage feed-back electronics is used and no cross-over has to be designed between the PZT and an external Pockels cell actuator, both of which need notoriously noisy high-voltage amplifiers. Furthermore, beam point- ing and power fluctuations which are introduced by the PZT could be avoided. The detection of the frequency noise is a non- demolition measurement of the NPRO power fluctua- tions and should in principle avoid the 3dB penalty that is the minimum to be paid in conventional power sta- bilization servos12. However, more investigations are needed to clarify why the power noise reduction in our experiment was smaller than expected. We would like to thank A. R¨ udiger for his assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. This work was sup- ported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within 3the Sonderforschungsbereich 407. 1.J. Hough, H.Ward, G.A. Kerr, N.L.Mackenzie, B.J. Meers, G.P. Newton, D.I.Robertson, N.A.Robertson, and R.Schilling, in D.G. Blair, ed. The Detection of Gravitational Waves , (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991) 2.T. J.Kane and R.L.Byer, Opt. Lett. 10, 65 (1985) 3.A.D.Farinas, E. K.Gustafson, and R.L.Byer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 12, 328, (1995) 4.I.Freitag, D.Golla, S.Knoke, W.Sch¨ one, H.Zellmer, A.T¨ unnermann, and H.Welling, Opt. Lett. 20, 462 (1995) 5.D.J. Ottaway, P.J.Veitch, M. W.Hamilton, C. Hollitt, D.Mudge, and J. Munch, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 34, 2006 (1998) 6.B. Willke, N.Uehara, E. K.Gustafson, R.L.Byer, P.J. King, S.U.Seel, R.L.Savage,Jr., Opt. Lett.23, 1704 (1998) 7.F.Bondu, P.Fritschel, C.N.Man, and A.Brillet, Opt. Lett.21, 582 (1996) 8.V.Quetschke, in preparation 9.T. Day, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, USA (1990) 10.R.Heilmann and B. Wandernoth, Electron. Lett. 28, 1367 (1992) 11.R.W.P.Drever, J.L. Hall, F.V.Kowalski, J. Hough, G. M.Ford, A.J.Munley, and H.Ward, Appl. Phys. B 31, 97 (1983) 12.C. C. Harb, T.C. Ralph, E.H. Huntington, D.E. Mc- Clelland, H.A. Bachor, and I.Freitag, JOSA B 14, 2936 (1997) 4

arXiv:physics/0005016v1 [physics.gen-ph] 7 May 2000New families of supercompact objects and a gravitational mechanism for multiperiodicity of Syg X-1∗† Zahid Zakir Institute of Noosphere, 11a Sayram, Tashkent, 700170 Uzbekistan zahid@in.edu.uz February 25, 2013 Abstract It is shown, that a topological difference between Newtonnia n and relativistic gravity leads to some observable effects and it allow predict a hierarchy of superc ompact objects - multibaryonic, quark and (possible) subquark stars instead of black holes. A reflecti on on the source of a falling matter (mirror horizon effect) leads to a gravitational breathing of exteri or layers of stars and a multiperiodicity of spectrum of supercompact stars (or nucleys of stars and gala xies). In the general relativity a creation and properties of super compact objects with sizes near a gravitational radius can be considered from a point of view of physical time dependence of radial coordinate. In [1] I show, that as result we obtain a new physical picture for star evolu tion after neutron star stage with hierarchy of superdense (but ordinary) matter stars, instead of black ho les. It is shown, that firstly, in general relativity a starting po int of physical radius r= 0 is the horizon R(0) = rg, where R(r) is the standard Schwarzschild’s radius, rgis the gravitational radius. Secondly, a dependence of Rfrom the physical time τleads to the reflection on the horizon of the falling from infin ity particles. The matter not ”penetrate” to the interior of hor izon and process is fully reversible in time. These facts lead to interesting and intriguing predictions in astrophysics. Detail consideration and dis- cussion will be presented in [2]. Here I consider some qualit ative predictions of this new version of general relativity of supercompact objects. The physical radial interval, measured by the radially orie nted rest scale at the orbit Rin the Schwarzschild field is: dr2=dR2 1−rg R(1) After integration we obtain for finite radial distances: r=/integraldisplaydR/radicalBig 1−rg R= (2) =R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+rgln|/radicalBigg R rg(1 +/radicalbigg 1−rg R)| (3) or: r=R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+F(R) (4) Here: ∗To be published in: ”Z.Zakir. Structure of space-time. Part II, paper 17, I.N., Tashkent, 2000.” †c/circlecopyrtInstitute of Noosphere, 2000. 12 F(R)|R=rg= 0 (5) and therefore: r(R)|R=rg= 0 (6) This means, that the Schwarzschild horizon R=rgis the starting point of the physical radius r= 0. Then the interior values of radial coordinate R < r gare nonphysical and they are not describe any physical reality. A physical velocity of falling to horizon photon is equal to cin all frames of reference: ds2=c2dτ2−dr2= 0 (7) where dr=/radicalbig −g11(R)dRis the physical radial distance and dτ=√g00dtis the physical time. Therefore, a dependence of Rfrom the physical time is: ±cτ=R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+F(R) (8) or: c2τ2=R(R−rg) +F2(R) + 2F(R)R/radicalbigg 1−rg R(9) Here we take τ= 0 at r= 0 (or R=rg). When the physical time τchanges at intervals ( −∞,0) and (0 ,∞), the physical radius rchanges at intervals ( ∞,0) and (0 ,∞). The trajectory of photon is time symmetric and for the rest observer the photon elastica lly reflects from the horizon and it can not ”penetrate” to interior ( ”mirror horizon”) . Here the scattering on the horizon for rest frame observer i s in fact the scattering on source, ’placed’ at r= 0 . For the finite mass particle, which falls freely from the infin ity we have: ±cdτ=1 r1/2 g/radicalBigg R (1−rg R)dR (10) and after integration we obtain [1]: ±cτ=2 3r1/2 g(R−rg)3/2+ 2r1/2 g(R−rg)1/2(11) or: c2τ2=4 9rg(R−rg)[(R−rg)2+ 2rg(R−rg) + 9r2 g] (12) We can see, that: 1) The falling particle can not cross the ’horizon’ and at all values of T= (−∞,∞) the radial coordinate Rchanges from 0 to ∞. 2) The falling particle elastically reflects at the source r= 0 (or at horizon R=rg) and the process is fully reversible in time. We see that the standard radial coordinate Rhas an excess nonphysical part, which equal to rgand appears because of the topological difference between the eu clidean (or orbital) radius and true radial distance in curved space. For this reason more convenient form of the r adial coordinate can be the ”topologically corrected” radial coordinate R0: R=R0+rg (13) a zero point of which coincides with a zero point of physical r adius r(R) = 0: R0|R=rg= 0 (14)3 All physical observables and effects, which depend from the d istance to the source, will contain specifical corrections to the Newtonnian formulas. These corrections appear because of the fact that the radius of the relativistic source has the shift rgand it placed nearer to the same orbit than Newtonnian one. In other words, relativistic source act to the particle at orbit Rexactly same as Newtonnian source act to the particle at orbit R−rg. Thus, we have a ”topologically corrected” Newton potentia l: ϕ=−γM R−rg(15) and Kepler law: T2=a·(R−rg)3(16) The perihelion shift, the light deflection and the horizon ar e such topological effects. For a planet at the orbit with the length 2 πRwe simply have: ω=/radicalBigg 2Mγ (R−rg)3=2π T0[1 +3rg 2R] (17) and then we directly obtain Einstein’s formula for the perih elion shift per period, which for the elliptic orbit with focal parameter Lis: ∆ϕ=3πrg L=6πγM c2L(18) In Newtonnian gravity an angle of the deflection of photons is : α=rg R(19) where Ris nearest distance to the source from the photon’s path. Thi s formula describe a simplified picture, where the gravitational field of the source effectively act only on the part of the photon’s path with length R, and the result of this interaction is falling of the photon n earer to the source ( αR=rg) to the distance rg. Then we must take into account that if the relativistic sour ce begin act to the photon from the same point as Newtonnian one, then the photon will fall to rgsince the Newtonnian gravity and it will fall an additional rgsince the difference between relativistic orbit and Newtonn ian one. Then the resulting deflection angle will be two times more than in Newtonnian gra vity: α=2rg R(20) Thus, we see that due to the topological nature of these two eff ects, first order relativistic corrections to Newtonnian gravity can be obtained without any complicated (geometric) calculations. The proper time dependence of the radial coordinate of freel y falling particle is: c2T2=4 9rgR3(21) and we see, that not only Rmust be ”topologically shifted” to R−rgfor convenience with the physical radius, but proper time Talso contains such ”topological gap” which equal to: c∆T=4 3rg (22) Same as radial coordinate shift, this ”proper time shift” le ads to observable effects. The time delay effect partly contain such contribution and it is an example of the ” proper time gap” effect. The results of preceding considerations lead to new treatme nts of supercompact states of matter. The interior of horizon is not exist, black holes are unphysical objects and the collapse is impossible. All spacetime intervals for physical objects are timelike or lightlike, t he time behavior of physical coordinate of falling matter up to the source ( r= 0) principally not differs from the falling to ordinary star s and they contain gravitational contractions only. The principal new phenom ena is the disappearing of Newtonnian potential’s singularity.REFERENCES 4 Supercompact stars with physical radius, which less than th e gravitational radius, have a finite phys- ical volume and a finite physical density. Hence, the hierarc hy of supercompact stars with ordinary and extraordinary physical matter not stop on the neutron star’ s level, but it continued to more dense physical states. For stars with masses, more than the critical mass of neutron star’s stability M >(3÷5)M⊙, the next family of stable states can appear. This is the family of multiquark hadron (multibaryon and multimeson) stars, containing 3n-quark baryons or 2n-quark mesons. The principally new type of supercompact exotic objects are quark stars, which appear after quark- hadron phase transition at high pressures and temperatures in case of massive supercompact stars. Some of observing candidates to black holes can be multihadronic or multiquark stars. The very important perspective for the particle physics is t he search of supermassive supercompact stars, containing subquarks or other type of substituents of quark s and leptons - subquark stars, and heavy particles of the grand unification and the supergravity - super(symmetry)stars. The falling matter strongly accelerated by a supercompact s tar’s field, than the accelerated matter bombard the surface of the compact star, which here is ideal t arget. The products of such bombardment then will emitt from the surface, then they can interact with other falling matter and resulting rich spectrum can be registered. Therefore, the supercompact stars act as superaccelerators and ideal laboratories for the superhigh energy physics. An energy generation in quasars and galaxy nucleis can be bet ter understanded taking into account emission during falling and scattering at the source and pro cesses of interaction of the falling matter with a reflecting matter. The time reversibility of falling and scattering of the matt er at horizon leads to a breathing mode for objects with a physical radius rnearrgand less than rg. During the period of breathing the falled matter will emitt a sufficient part of its energy and a luminocity of th e star will change with this period. But in real stars can fall not all the exterior matter, but onl y some layers with different densities and with different particle content. Then we obtain a multiperio dical supercompact stars model. Periods of breathing depend from the initial radiuses of the falled lay ers. A well known candidate to black hole - Syg X-1 has such multipe riodical spectrum and we can suppose, that this object can be a star with heavy baryonic, multibary onic (or quark) exotic state superdense nucley and several breathing layers of the less dense matter with or dinary particle content. Not only the exotic stars periodicity, but the periodicitie s of some ordinary stars also can be explained partly by a contribution of the gravitational breathing mod es of their layers, periodically reflecting from superdense nucleis. Thus, instead of unphysical black holes, the general relati vity really predicts the hierarchies of exotic supercompact stars, which repeat or represent the hierarch y of high energy particle physics states. The mass spectrum of such exotic stars represent in some approximati on the mass spectrum of elementary particles. The dynamics of such exotic objects is nontrivial, complica ted, but it interesting because of their predic- tions can be studied by the methods of ordinary physics and ob servable. References [1] physics/0005009 Zakir Z. (2000) One topological secret of gravitation and its surprises for astrophysics, cosmology and particle physics. 7 p. [2] Zakir Z. (2000) Structure of space-time. (in preparatio n)

arXiv:physics/0005017v1 [physics.gen-ph] 8 May 2000Han-Shin Apt. 121-402, Dobong-dong Dobong-ku, Seoul, 132- 012 KoreaE-mail: yyg kr@hotmail.com Abstract A general recession of distant galaxies is discussed in rela tion to the apparent acceleration Pioneer 10/11 have indicated. This p aper describes how the anomalous acceleration shed additional light on the dynamic fea- ture of expanding universe. By 1998 when Pioneer 10 was 69 AU away from the Sun, Anderson, Laing, Lau, Liu, Nieto, and Turyshev [1] announced that radi o metric data from Pioneer 10/11 had indicated an apparent anomalous, con stant, ac- celeration acting on the spacecraft with a magnitude ∼8.5×10−8cm/s2, directed towards the Sun since 1980 when 20 AU away from the Su n. Comments and Replies [2] argue its possible relations with n onisotropic radiative cooling of the spacecraft electronics, or with th e recoil of radi- ation coming from the spacecraft radioactive thermal gener ator, adding interest in the origin of the anomalous signal. What possibl e origin for the Pioneer signal comes to mind? In the first place it leads to speculate on the possibility that the origin of the anomalous signal is new physics or some standard physics such as the velocity of propagation of gravita- tion. This possibility is of interest in itself, given that t hey have found no plausible explanation. In this review I shall try to give an a ccount of the anomalous acceleration on physical considerations. In attempting to explain the acceleration, my attention foc used on the fact that the centrifugal acceleration of about 1 .8×10−8cm/s2in the solar system due to rotation of our galaxy is of the same order of mag nitude. Moreover, the centrifugal acceleration is consistent with observation that no magnitude variation of the acceleration with distance wa s found, within a sensitivity of 2 times 10−8cm/s2over a range of 40 to 60 AU. The points have led me to put the weight of its possible explanation in th e motion of our galaxy. Non-uniform rotation of our galaxy gives a hint on its intern al motions such as local expansion or contraction while rotating, maki ng an addi- tional contribution to the centrifugal acceleration. It ca n be estimated using the experimental curve of the rotating velocity vs the distance from the axis [3]. In the curve the gradient of velocity at the posi tion of the solar system is seen to be about −10 km/s/kpc, by which non-uniform rotation makes one order of magnitude small contribution to the centrifu- gal acceleration [4]. The Coriolis effect on the moving Pione ers at 12.5 km/s is about 11% in magnitude of the centrifugal accelerati on. As no further explanation was found in the rotational motion of ou r galaxy, my attention was turned to the translational motion of our gala xy as a whole. Continuing my search for acceleration I speculated with rel uctance on a possibility whether an acceleration could be deduced from t he recessional, virtually uniform, velocity of galaxies. But it came out und er scrutiny how acceleration was being involved in the recessional velocit y of galaxies. The argument of indicating an acceleration existing in a genera l recession of distant galaxies is as follows: 1The announcement by Hubble in 1929 of a “roughly linear relat ion between velocities and distances” established in most astr onomers’ minds a sort of bird’s-eye view of a general recession of distant ga laxies. But extra care should have been taken for understanding the rela tion. Our information about the frequency shifts comes to us through t he observa- tion of light emitted by distant sources. It becomes evident therefore that velocity at a distance rpresents itself as a direct consequence of the time △t=r/cof propagation of light, and Hubble’s law is interpreted in t erms ofv=cH△t. Then the linear increase in velocity with distance turns ou t to be a result of longer light travel times from further dista nt galaxies. Obviously it reveals an acceleration existing in the genera l recession of distant galaxies. The times of propagation of light enable one to identify the r ed shifts in frequency of sources in terms of their recessional veloci ties at the re- tarded times compared with the time of observation. As we loo k further and further out into space, we see galaxies that are presumab ly younger and younger, the furthest naturally being those in the remot est past. Ob- servation makes it obvious that the linear increase in reces sional velocities with distance can be interpreted as due to the linear decreas e in relative velocities with time up to the time of observation. This mani fests the direction of acceleration against the recession. The gener al recession in deep space of distant galaxies must therefore be slowing dow n at a uniform rate. Of particular interest is that Hubble’s law is thereby looke d upon as a consequence of the recessional velocities of the form v=v0−cHt. It is to be emphasized that our galaxy too is in a recession so far as it is not at the center of expanding universe. Scattering around a straight line of observational data might be due to recession of our galaxy itself while observing distant galaxies. If our galaxy were at the center of expanding universe, observational data would fall along a straight li ne. It seems thus possible to locate the center of expanding universe by using conversely this notion of expansion [5]. It is supposed on purely dynamical grounds that the universe will eventually cease its expansion and begin to contract. Taken literally, this means that the state of the hot early universe with which the p resent uni- verse has started will be reached again at some finite time in t he future, rendering justice to the Friedmann model based on the Robert son-Walker metric with k= +1. The deceleration of expansion seems to be of gravi- tational character occuring on a scale of the universe, in wh ich the value cHis identified with the gravitational field of the universe as s een by the solar system. The physics of the situation can most easily be illustrated by assuming a nongravitational origin for the present expan sion of the universe. Summarizing the results we see that the acceleration existi ng in the general recession of distant galaxies relative to our galax y is given by adding to cHthe centrifugal acceleration arising from rotation of the s o- lar system. On the basis of the argument the acceleration as s een by the 2solar system, that is to say, directed towards the solar syst em has been assumed to be cH. Pioneer 10/11 moving at the constant velocity away from the solar system make themselves ideal instruments to p robe for an additional acceleration in space. The difference they have o bserved in the retarded velocities of Pioneer 10/11 reflects the dynami c character we have seen here from the general recession of distant galaxie s. The anoma- lous acceleration which appeared in Pioneer 10/11 tracking can thus be interpreted to be equivalent to that as-yet-unknown accele ration. Indeed the value cHis in substantial agreement with the anomalous acceleratio n. Considerations lead to the conclusion that the apparent acc eleration act- ing on Pioneer 10/11 is a reflection of the dynamic feature of e xpanding universe, and the Hubble constant inferred from the spacecr aft data is ∼87 km/s/Mpc. References [1] J. D. Anderson, P. A. Laing, E. L. Lau, A. S. Liu, M. M. Nieto , and S. G. Turyshev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2858 (1998); gr-qc/9903024. [2] E. Murphy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1890 (1999); gr-qc/9810015; J. I. Katz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1892 (1999); gr-qc/9809707. Replies in the following pages. [3] D. P. Clemens, Astrophys. J. 295, 422 (1985). [4] H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics (Dover, 1945), 6th ed., p.28. [5] The Andromeda galaxy is at a distance of 2 .2×106light years from our galaxy. According to the present argument, the retarded veloc- ity of the Andromeda galaxy is seen to be approaching our gala xy if both galaxies are receding from beyond that galaxy. The “c os- mological” blue shift of 80 km/s of the Andromeda galaxy sugg ests such a possibility with an inference that the Hubble constan t along such a direction may be 120 km/s/Mpc or more. 3

arXiv:physics/0005018v1 [physics.bio-ph] 8 May 2000Optimal Mutation Rates on Static Fitness Landscapes Martin Nilsson Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chalmers University of T echnology and G¨ oteborg University, S-412 96 G¨ oteborg, Sw eden martin@fy.chalmers.se (February 2, 2008) We study the evolution of mutation rates for an asexual popul ation living on a static fitness landscape, consisting of multiple peaks forming an evoluti onary staircase. The optimal mutation rate is found by maximizing the diffusion towards higher fitne ss. Surprisingly the optimal genomic copying fidelity is given by Qopt=e−1 lnν(where νis the genome length), independent of all other parameters in the model. Simulations confirm this theoretic al result. We also discuss the relation between the optimal mutation rate on static and dynamic fitne ss landscapes. Evolution on the molecular level can be viewed as a diffusion process. The equations describing the time dy- namics of a population of gene sequences are a set of discrete diffusion equations with an exponential growth term. The diffusion stems from inaccurate copying of the genome during replication. This enables the population to explore the sequence space, i.e., the space spanned by all possible gene sequences. Point mutations makes the Hamming distance a natural metric on sequence space, which becomes topologically equivalent to a hyper-cube of dimension ν, where νis the genome length. The high dimensionality makes analysis of the general diffusion process difficult. In this paper we focus on the evolution through a specified path in the hypercube and disregard the dynamics of all other gene sequences. This gives a one dimensional sequence space. We are interested in the optimal mutation rate, which is defined as the mutation rate that maximizes the diffusion speed. The genome codes mainly for proteins which regulate the chemical reactions within the cell. One of the pro- cesses that are under genomic control is the replication of the genome itself. When the genetic material is copied there are replicase enzymes involved. This is important since an unguided base pairing process is highly inaccu- rate. The enzymes are determined by the genome and the mutation rate of the organism is therefore under evo- lutionary control. This implies that the mutation rates observed in living organisms have been selected for by Darwinian evolution. Naively one may think that since most mutations that affect the fitness are deleterious, organisms should evolve as low mutation rates as possible. Measurments of mu- tation rates however show that organisms have copying fidelities much below what could be expected from this assumption [1,2]. They also show that the genomic muta- tion rate, i.e., the probability of one or more mutations to occur during one replication of the whole genome, is ap- proximantly constant within similar groups of organisms. This is surprising since the copying of the genetic mate- rial is a local process and it is the mutation rate per base pair that are directly affected by the replicase enzymes. Most attempts to find an evolutionary explanation forthe observed mutation rates have been based on popula- tions evolving in a changing environment, see e.g., [3–10]. It is easy to understand that a non-zero mutation rate is selected for on a dynamic fitness landscape, since per- fect copying will unable adaption to new conditions. Re- cently a theoretical study has shown that the optimal genomic copying fidelity in a dynamic environment is approximately independent of genome length [10]. The theory also predicts mutation rates of the same order of magnitude as observed for simple DNA based organisms. In this paper we study a different model. The popula- tion lives in a static environment, but starts far from the global fitness maximum. A non-zero mutation rate is se- lected for by maximizing the rate of evolution towards better fit genotypes. Consider an asexual haploid population of individuals, represented by genomes of length ν. The fitness land- scape consists of a number of peaks with superior fitness surrounded by a background. The evolution on this land- scape is driven by mutations enabling jumps from one fitness peak to a higher peak in the close neighborhood. We study a population of Ngene sequences starting at a low fitness peak which then mutate onto successive fitness peaks of increasing height ( σ1< σ2<· · ·). Furthermore we assume the copying fidelity per base, q, to be constant over the genome. The probability of a gene sequence to copy onto itself during one replication event, the genomic copying fidelity, is then given by Q=qν. We also assume the probability of an individual on peak σi−1to produce an offspring on peak σiduring a replication event to be pi(1−q)αiqν−αi. This means that the number of bases where the sequences defining peak σi−1andσidiffer is αi. The factor piis an arbitrary combinatorial factor, accounting for possible redundancies in sequence space, alphabet size, etc. All higher fitness peaks, σkfork > i, are assumed to be further away so that mutations from peakσi−1can be neglected. The evolution of the relative concentrations xnis described by differential equation ˙x1=W1,1θN(x1) +W1,2θN(x2)−fx1 ˙x2=W2,1θN(x1) +W2,2θN(x2) +W2,3θN(x3)−fx2 1... ˙xn=Wn,n−1θN(xn−1) +Wn,nθN(xn) + Wn,n+1θN(xn+1)−fxn (1) where the function θNis defined as θN(xn) = xn ifx >1 Nand 0 otherwise, and therefore accounts for the limited population size. The factor f=/summationtext i(qν+pi(1−q)αi)σiθN(xi) ensures xito be normal- ized as relative concentrations. The matrix elements of Ware given by Wn,n=qνσn Wn−1,n=pn(1−q)αnqν−αnσn−1 Wn,n+1=pn+1(1−q)αn+1qν−αn+1σn+1 (2) We start with a population that consists of individuals on the first peak σ1, i.e., we define the initial values as xi(0) =/braceleftbigg 1i= 1 0i/negationslash= 1(3) 10 20 30 40t0.20.40.60.81xk x1 x2 x3 x4 FIG. 1. The time dynamics of Eq. 1 is simulated numeri- cally. When the population diffuses off the initial peak σ1it starts evolving to peaks with higher and higher fitness. The parameters used in this plot are ν= 100, σi=i,p= 0.01, Q= 0.99 and N= 106. The infinite population size limit of Eq. 1 corresponds to a discrete normalized one-dimensional diffusion equa- tion with an exponential growth term. However, this limit is not interesting for realistic systems since it does not allow propagating distributions of concentrations lo- calized in sequence space. If the fitness grows faster than linearly for example, the concentration on fitness peaks far from the starting point grow large before the concen- trations on peaks closer to the origin. This bizarre effect stems from the exponential growth of very small (expo- nentially decaying with the distance from the origin) but non-zero concentrations over all the fitness peaks shortly after the start. In this model we implicitly assume the mutation rates to evolve much slower than the fitness, i.e. there are no significant changes in the mutation rate during the evo- lution from one fitness peak to the next peak.The optimal copying fidelity qoptis defined by maxi- mizing the diffusion speed towards genotypes with supe- rior fitness. Mathematically this corresponds to minimiz- ing the time Tit takes for the concentration xnon peak σnto reach its maximum, when the population starts at the proceeding peak σn−1. At the time when mu- tants from peak σn−1have enabled the concentration xnto become large enough, i.e. xn>1 N, exponential growth will start with initial concentration proportional topn(1−q)αn. Since the population at this time is lo- calized around peak nthe concentration xnis described approximately by xn(t)∼γeqνσnt eqνσn−1t+γeqνσnt+γ2eqνσn+1t(4) where γ=pn(1−q)αn. The denominator normalizes xn by summing the absolute growth in the surrounding of peakn, see Fig. 2. The time Twhen xn(t) has a maxi- mum can be found by solvingdxn(t) dt= 0, giving 5 10 15 20t0.050.10.150.20.250.3x4 FIG. 2. The picture shows x4given by Eq. 4. The relevant parameter are the same as in Fig. 1; ν= 100, σi=i,p= 0.01 andQ= 0.99. The maximum occurs at time T≈14 (de- fined as the time from the last peak’s maximum). This is in agreement with the numerical solutions shown in Fig. 1. T=−1 σn+1−σn−1·ln/parenleftbig γ2κ/parenrightbig qν(5) where κ=σn+1−σn σn−σn−1. The diffusion speed is defined as v=1 T. By making the approximation κ≈1, we can write V=−σn+1−σn−1 2·qν ln (γ)(6) 0.996 0.997 0.998 0.999q 0.0550.0650.070.075v 2FIG. 3. The figure shows V(q) given by Eq. 6. The maxi- mum gives the optimal copying fidelity qopt. Parameters used in the figure are ν= 100, σi=iandp= 0.01. The shape of the cure is not sensitive to the parameter values, as long as ν≫1. The optimal copying fidelity qoptis defined to maxi- mize the diffusion speed, and can therefore be derived by finding the maximum of V(q) in Eq. 6 (see Fig. 3). Setting the derivative to zero,dV dq= 0, and noting that q≈1 gives the equation: 1 +1 ν(1−q)(ln(¯p) + ln(1 −q))= 0 (7) We are interested in the limit where the genome length is large. In this limit the first term in the denominator (involving ¯ p) can be neglected. Eq. 7 then reduces to ν(1−q)ln(1 −q) =−1 (8) There is no closed analytic expressions for the solution to this equation, but a converging iterative expression can be found for the optimal copying fidelities qopt= 1−1 νln (νln (νln (· · ·))) Qopt≈e−1 lnν (9) It is surprising that the optimal genomic copying fidelity depends so weakly on the genome length, and even more surprising that it is independent of all other parameters in the model. This independence is both interesting and important, especially since we start by assuming a spe- cific path for evolution. As it turns out the optimal muta- tion rate does not depend on the particular path chosen. The insensitivity of Qoptwhen the genome length varies can be seen by considering biologically plausible genome lengths, see Fig. 5. Note that the genomic copying fi- delity increases with genome length. 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.88 0.9Q 0.1370.1380.1390.141V FIG. 4. The figure shows the region where V(q) has a max- imum, calculated by numerical simulations of Eq. 1. Parame- ter settings in the simulations were p= 0.01,α= 1,N= 108 andν= 1000. The minimum occurs approximately at the point predicted by Eq. 9, i.e., Qopt= 0.86.1000 100000. 1.·1071.·109v0.880.90.920.94Qopt FIG. 5. The figure demonstrates how weakly Qoptscales with genome length. In simulations of a population consisting of 2000 indi- viduals with genome length ν= 70 on a rugged fitness landscape (created by an elementary folding algorithm for calculating secondary structures of gene sequences), Fontana and Schuster [11] find that the rate of evolution is maximal approximately at µ= 0.003. This is in close agreement with the mutation rate as predicted by Eq. 9 for genome length 70, µopt= 0.0025. The optimal copying fidelity given in Eq. 9 can also be derived using a more intuitive argument. The ar- gument also shows more clearly how evolved mutation rates on static fitness landscapes relate to evolved muta- tion rates in dynamic environments. The rate of growth between two peaks, with fitness difference ∆ σ, is given byeQ∆σt. The diffusion from an occupied peak to the next is proportional to (1 −q)α, where αmeasures the distance in sequence space between the peaks. The time, T, it takes for a population to evolve from one peak to an other will therefore be given by the solution of the equation (1 −q)αeQ∆σt= 1, i.e. T∼ −αln(1−q) qν∆σ. Or- ganisms, free to change their mutation rates, evolve a copying fidelity qoptthat minimizes T(q). Deriving an expression for the equationdT dq= 0, using qν≈1, gives 1 1−q+νln(1−q) = 0, which is equivalent to Eq. 8 and is solved by Qopt≈e−1 lnν. In a recent paper [10], the evolution of mutation rates on a dynamic fitness landscape was studied. The fit- ness landscape consists of a single peak moving around in sequence space, shifting position on average once ev- eryτgenerations. The relative selective advantage for a sequence on the fitness peak is σ. A shift of the peak consist of αchanges of bases in the sequence defining the fitness peak. Since an individual in the population needs to produce offspring that are able to follow the shifts of the fitness peak, a non-zero mutation rate is selected for. It turns out that finding the optimal copying fidelity is equivalent to minimizing (1 −q)αeQστwith respect to q. This is the same expression as for the growth rate be- tween fitness peaks on a static landscape. However, in the dynamic case the growth over a cycle, consisting of a shift and a static period, is be optimized rather than the time to evolve from one peak to the next. More gen- 3erally, if the evolution of mutation rate is driven by a dynamic environment it will be selected to optimize the growth on the changing fitness landscape, whereas on a static landscape the mutation rate maximizing the rate of evolution towards higher fit genotypes will be selected for. Maximizing the growth on a dynamic landscape gives Qdyn=e−α στ. There are some fundamental differences between the two models presented above. In the model based on dynamic fitness landscapes the population dynamics is driven by external changes of the environment. The or- ganisms have to passively wait for the environment to change and then adapt to the new fitness landscape. In the model based on rugged fitness landscapes the situa- tion is different. There always exist a higher fitness peak in the close neighborhood so the population has to min- imize the time for diffusing to and growing large on the higher peak. Hence the population should actively search the surroundings in sequence space. The main difference between the models is therefore the preexistent of higher fitness peaks close in sequence space, which results in very different optimal mutation rates. The genomic copying fidelity in both the static and dynamic case is approximately independent of genome length, a phenomenon that is also observed in nature. To be more precise, experiments show that the genomic copying fidelity is approximately constant within groups of similar organisms, e.g., simple DNA-based organisms haveQ≈0.996 whereas RNA based retroviruses have Q≈0.9 [1]. Simple DNA based organisms for example have much too low mutation rates to be explained by evolution on the static landscapes studied in this paper. Retroviruses on the other hand show mutation rates that are in agreement with the predictions made in this pa- per. However, they may also be explained by mutation rates evolved as a response to a changing environment as discussed above. It is therefore unclear whether the ma- jor force behind the evolution of mutation rates for retro virus is maximizing the evolution rate towards higher fit- ness or maximizing the growth in a changing environment (caused be the immune system). In conclusion, we show that the optimal genomic copy- ing fidelity, i.e., that which optimizes the rate of evolu- tion, on a rugged fitness landscape can be written as Qopt=e−1 ln(ν), where νis the genome length. The op- timal genomic copying fidelity on rugged fitness land- scapes is predicted to be around 0 .9 for realistic genome lengths ( ν∈[103,1010]). Of the mutation rates observedin nature, retroviruses (including HIV) confirm this pre- diction. The model presented here therefore presents a possible explanation for the observed mutation rates for retro viruses. The author would like to thank Jennie Jacobi and “Mullb¨ aret” for providing a nice and stimulating envi- ronment while working on the ideas behind this paper. Thanks are also due to Mats Nordahl and Johan Ivarsson for valuable comments on the manuscript. [1] J.W. Drake, B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, and J.F. Crow. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics , 148(4):1667–86, 1998. [2] J.W. Drake. Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 90(9):4171–5, 1993. [3] M Kimura. On the evolutionary adjustment of sponta- neous mutation rates. Genet. Res. , 9:23–24, 1967. [4] E.G. Leigh. The evolution of mutation rates. Genetics Suppl. , 73:1–18, 1973. [5] K. Ishii, H. Matsuda, Y. Iwasa, and A. Saskai. Evolu- tionarily stable mutation rate in a periodically changing environment. Genetics , 121:163–174, 1989. [6] J.H. Gillespie. Mutation modification in a random envi- ronment. Evolution , 35:468–476, 1981. [7] S.P. Otto and Y. Michalakis. The evolution of recom- bination in changing environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. , 13(4):145–151, 1998. [8] S.P. Otto and M.W. Feldman. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of re- combination. Theor. Popul. Biol. , 51(2):134–147, 1997. [9] G. Ochoa, I. Harvey, and H. Buxton. On recombination and optimal mutation rates. In Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO- 99), Orlando, Florida, USA, July 1999. [10] M. Nilsson and N. Snoad. Optimal Mutation Rates on Dynamic Fitness Landscapes. LANL e-print archive: physics/0004042, 2000. [11] W. Fontana and P. Schuster. A computer model of evolu- tionary optimization. Biophysical Chemistry , 26:123–147, 1987. [12] L. Tisimring, H. Levine and D. Kessler. RNA Virus Evolution via a Fitness-Space Model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 76(23), 4440–4443, 1996. [13] D. Kessler and H. Levine. Mutator Model on a Smooth Evolutionary Landscpe. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80(9), 2012– 2015, 1998. 4

arXiv:physics/0005019v1 [physics.ed-ph] 8 May 2000Los Alamos Electronic ArXives http://xxx.lanl.gov/physics/0005019 Electrodin´ amica Cl´ asica HARET C. ROSU e-mail: rosu@ifug3.ugto.mx fax: 0052-47187611 phone: 0052-47183089 Spanish Abstract Aqu´ ı se bosquejan algunos temas impartidos durante el curs o de electrodin´ amica cl´ asica I, de acuerdo al programa del Instituto de F´ ısica d e la Universidad de Guanajuato, M´ exico. English Abstract Excerpts are presented from a graduate course on Classical E lectrodynamics held during the spring semester of 2000 at the Institute of Ph ysics, Guana- juato State University, Mexico. Mayo de 2000 Copyright c/ci∇cleco√y∇t2000 by the author. All commercial rights are reserved. 1Clase 1 Generalidades Los campos el´ ectrico ( /vectorE) y de inducci´ on magn´ etica ( /vectorB) se introdujeron orig- inalmente a trav´ es de la fuerza ejercida por cargas ( q′) o corrientes ( I) sobre una carga de prueba ( q): /vectorFq=q/vectorE↔/vectorE=1 q/vectorFq, d/vectorFI=Id/vectorl×/vectorB↔B=|d/vectorFI| Idlsinα. De acuerdo con esto, /vectorEse interpreta como fuerza por unidad de carga y/vectorB como fuerza por unidad de corriente . Sin embargo ambos campos tienen significado propio, independiente del tipo de fuente que los genera. Ahora bien, /vectorEy/vectorBno son los ´ unicos campos importantes en la elec- trodin´ amica. En la mayor´ ıa de las sustancias: /vectorD=ǫ0/vectorE+/vectorP, /vectorH=1 µ0/vectorB−/vectorM . /vectorDse conoce como desplazamiento el´ ectrico, /vectorHcampo magn´ etico, /vectorPy/vectorMson, respectivamente, las polarizaciones el´ ectrica y magn´ et ica (i. e., representan el promedio macrosc´ opico de dipolos el´ ectricos /magn´ eticos en el material en presencia de campos); ǫ0= 8.85×10−12C/Nm2,µ0= 4π×10−7H/myǫ0µ0= c−2. La conexi´ on entre los vectores ( /vectorP,/vectorE) y (/vectorM,/vectorH) est´ a determinada por las propiedades de cada sustancia. Para medios anisotr´ opicos la aproximaci´ on lineal en los campos es: Pi=ǫ0αikEk, Mi=κikHk, coni,k= 1,2,3;αes el tensor de polarizabilidad y κel tensor de magneti- zaci´ on. Entonces Di=ǫikEk, Bi=µikHk, 2dondeǫik≡ǫ0(δik+αik),µik≡µ0(δik+κik). Para medios isotr´ opicos: /vectorP=ǫ0α/vectorE /vectorM=κ/vectorH, ǫ ≡ǫ0(1 +α) /vectorD=ǫ/vectorE, µ ≡µ0(1 +κ) /vectorB=µ/vectorH. Una vez definidos estos vectores, podemos presentar las ecua ciones de Maxwell (1873), que son en electrodin´ amica lo que las leyes de Newton en mec´ anica. Las ecuaciones de Maxwell en forma diferencial s on ∇ ×/vectorH=/vectorj+∂/vectorD ∂t, (1) ∇ ·/vectorB= 0, (2) ∇ ×/vectorE=−∂/vectorB ∂t, (3) ∇ ·/vectorD=ρ (4) (ρes la densidad de carga y /vectorjla densidad de corriente). La forma integral de estas ecuaciones es /contintegraldisplay C/vectorH·d/vectorl=/integraldisplay S /vectorj+∂/vectorD ∂t ·ˆndA, /contintegraldisplay S/vectorB·ˆndA= 0 /contintegraldisplay C/vectorE·d/vectorl=−/integraldisplay S∂/vectorB ∂t·ˆndA, /contintegraldisplay S/vectorD·ˆndA=/integraldisplay VρdV. De estas ´ ultimas se obtienen las condiciones de frontera en tre dos medios: (/vectorD2−/vectorD1)·ˆn1,2=σ, (5) ˆn1,2×(/vectorE1−/vectorE2) = 0, (6) (/vectorB2−/vectorB1)·ˆn1,2= 0, (7) ˆn1,2×(/vectorH2−/vectorH1) =/vectori, (8) 3donde |/vectori|=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingledI dS/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle. Electrost´ atica Estudiamos un problema de electrost´ atica si se satisfacen las condiciones •No hay dependencia temporal en los campos. •No existen cargas en movimiento. Con esto, las ecuaciones de Maxwell (1 - 4) se reducen a ∇ ×/vectorE= 0, (9) ∇ ·/vectorD=ρ. (10) En vista de (9), del c´ alculo vectorial sabemos que /vectorE=−∇Φ. De esta forma se introduce el potencial electrost´ atico (Φ) . Considerando medios isotr´ opicos (i. e., /vectorD=ǫ/vectorE) la ecuaci´ on (10) se reduce a ∇2Φ =−ρ ǫ que se conoce como ecuaci´ on de Poisson (en ausencia de cargas se obtiene la ecuaci´ on de Laplace ). Por otra parte, las condiciones de frontera (5 - 8) se reducen a Φ1= Φ 2, ǫ1(∇Φ·ˆn)1−ǫ2(∇Φ·ˆn)2=σ. En el caso de un conductor, dado que en su interior el campo el´ ectrico es nulo, se tiene Φconductor = const, y as´ ı, la densidad superficial de carga en el mismo es σ=−ǫ(∇Φ·ˆn)afuera. 4Magnetost´ atica Las condiciones para hablar de magnetost´ atica son: •No hay dependencia temporal en los campos. •Hasta hoy no se han detectado los monopolos magn´ eticos. Bajo estas consideraciones las ecuaciones de Maxwell (1 - 4) se simplifican a ∇ ×/vectorH=/vectorj, (11) ∇ ·/vectorB= 0, (12) y las condiciones de frontera (5 - 8) (/vectorD1−/vectorD2)·ˆn1,2= 0, ˆn1,2×(/vectorH2−/vectorH1) =/vectori. Al igual que en el caso electrost´ atico, a partir del c´ alcul o vectorial y (12) se introduce el potencial vectorial magn´ etico como /vectorB=∇ ×/vectorA el cual, para materiales homog´ eneos e isotr´ opicos ( /vectorB=µ/vectorH), se obtiene de (11) como ∇2/vectorA=−µ/vectorj (13) (NOTA: cabe aclarar que, dada su definici´ on, da lo mismo toma r/vectorAque /vectorA+∇ϕ; por ello se elige el potencial vectorial tal que ∇(∇·/vectorA) = 0, obteniendo as´ ı (13) a partir de (11)). Si se conoce /vectorj, la soluci´ on a (13) es /vectorA(/vector r) =µ 4π/integraldisplay V/vectorj(/vector r′) |/vector r−/vector r′|dV′ y parar≫rsistema /vectorA(/vector r) =µ 4π/vector m×/vector r r3 donde/vector mes el momento magn´ etico del sistema, dado como /vector m=1 2/integraldisplay V/vector r×/vectorj(r)dV. 5Por ´ ultimo, la energ´ ıa de un campo magn´ etico est´ atico es Wmag =1 2/integraldisplay /vectorB·/vectorHdV =µ 8π/integraldisplay/vectorj(/vector r)·/vectorj(/vector r′) |/vector r−/vector r′|dVdV′. Para un sistema de conductores Wmag=1 2/summationdisplay i,kLikIiIk, donde se define el coeficiente de inducci´ on magn´ etica entre las corrientes /vectorji y/vectorjkcomo Lik=µ 4πIiIk/integraldisplay/vectorjk(/vector rk)·/vectorji(/vector ri) |/vector rk−/vector ri|dVkdVi. 6Clase 2 En el caso en el cual los campos var´ ıan lentamente en el tiemp o, o sea son funcionesf(at) donde se satisfacen las condiciones a≪1 ω≪σc ǫl≪λ conσcconductividad, ω,λcar´ acter´ ısticas de las oscilaciones electromagn´ etica s, ldimensiones lineales del sistema. Las ecuaciones de Maxwell toman la forma ▽ ×H=J ▽ ×E=−∂B ∂t ▽ ·B= 0 ▽ ·D=ρ . Obs´ ervese que se ha despreciado el t´ ermino∂D ∂t. En el caso de campos variables arbitrarios para situaciones en las cuales no existen corrientes ni cargas presentes las ecuaciones de Ma xwell toman la siguiente forma ▽ ×H=∂D ∂t▽ ×E=−∂B ∂t ▽ ·B= 0 ▽ ·D= 0. Se tienen soluciones tipo ondas planas E=Eoei(k·r−ωt) H=Hoei(k·r−ωt). Las notaciones usadas son las usuales, ωes la frecuencia, |k|=ω ces el vector de onda, la direcci´ on del cual, en medios isotr´ opic os, coincide con la direcci´ on de la energ´ ıa. El vector que justamente nos da el flujo de energ´ ıa es el llamado vector de Poynting ( S), definido por S=E×H. (1) Para campos variables la conexi´ on entre los campos y los pot enciales es de la forma E=− ▽φ−∂A ∂t 7B=▽ ×A. (2) En general, los potenciales no son observables directament e (sino por sus efectos, E,B). Entre ellos existe una condici´ on muy importante (de cons is- tencia de la teor´ ıa electromagn´ etica) que se llama condic i´ on de “gauge” que puede ser diferente en funci´ on de la condici´ on considerad a. Una de las condiciones de “gauge” m´ as frecuentes es la de Lor entz ▽ ·A+ǫµ∂φ ∂t= 0. (3) Esta condici´ on “gauge” es muy usada porque permite una simp le general- izaci´ on de las ecuaciones laplacianas del caso est´ atico 2φ=−ρ ǫ 2A=−µJ (4) estas ecuaciones son llamadas D’Alembertianas y 2≡ ▽2−∂2 ∂t2. Los po- tenciales que son soluci´ on de estas ecuaciones son llamado s potenciales re- tardados (y no precisamente porque sean muy tontos) los cual es tienen la forma φ(r,t) =1 4πǫ/integraldisplayρ(r′,t−|r−r′| v) |r−r′|dV′(5) A(r,t) =µ 4π/integraldisplayJ(r′,t−|r−r′| v) |r−r′|dV′. (6) A grandes distancias del sistema de cargas ( r>>λ ) y en el vac´ ıo, B,EyA se pueden escribir como sigue B=1 c˙A×n (7) E=cB×n= (˙A×n)×n (8) A=µ 4πr/integraldisplay J(r′,t−|r−r′| v)dV′(9) donden=r res el versor en la direcci´ on de la radiaci´ on. Si adem´ as λ>>l , con lla dimensi´ on del sistema radiante, se puede usar la llamada aproximaci´ on multipolar, es decir, la radiaci´ on se puede representar co mo una sumatoria de 8los campos emitidos por los dipolos, cuadrupolos, etc., que forman el sistema. Para el caso dipolar se tiene B=µ0¨p×n 4πcr(10) E=µ0 4πr(¨p×n×n) (11) donde pes el momento dipolar del sistema. La intensidad de la radiac i´ on de un dipolo es I=¨p2 6πǫ0c3. (12) Magnetohidrodin´ amica La magnetohidrodin´ amica estudia el comportamiento de los l´ ıquidos o los gases conductores (plasmas) en campos electromagn´ eticos . Se usan los con- ceptos hidrodin´ amicos: densidad, velocidad, presi´ on, v iscosidad. Las ecua- ciones b´ asicas son:∂ρm ∂t+▽ ·(ρmv) = 0 ρm∂v ∂t+ρm(v· ▽)v=− ▽P+j×B+η▽2v+ρmg ▽ ×E=−∂B ∂t▽ ×H=j j =σe(E+v×B) mas la ecuaci´ on de estado del fluido. Relatividad Especial La teor´ ıa de la relatividad especial surgi´ o en la electrod in´ amica y se basa en dos postulados fundamentales •La velocidad de la luz en el vac´ ıo c= 2.99793×108m/ses una constante en todos los sistemas de referencia inerciales. •Las leyes de la F´ ısica tienen la misma forma en todos los sist emas inerciales (covariancia de las leyes naturales). 9Las transformaciones de Lorentz en una dimensi´ on se escrib en as´ ı x′ 1=x1+iβx4√1−β2 x′ 2=x2 x′ 3=x3 x′ 4=x4−iβx1√1−β2 dondex4=ict,x′ 4=ict′,β=v c. Las velocidades u′de un cuerpo en K’ con respecto a las velocidades udel mismo cuerpo en K est´ an relacionadas mediante las siguientes expresiones u′ x=ux−v 1−vux c2, u y=uy√1−β2 1−vux c2, u′ z=uz√1−β2 1−vux c2. La segunda ley para part´ ıculas relativistas se escribe F=dp dt=d dt/parenleftiggmv√1−β2/parenrightigg . Cantidades del tipo ( p,i/cE ) son llamadas cuadrivectores, el anterior se llama cuadrivector de impulso-energ´ ıa. Otros ejemplos de cuadrivectores son (k,i/cω); (j,icρ); (A,i/cϕ). Existen tambi´ en objetos llamados cuadriten- sores por extensi´ on de lo anterior, algunos ejemplos de ell os son Fαβ= 0cBz−cBy−iEx −cBz0cBx−iEy cBy−cBx0 −iEz iExiEyiEz0  Tαβ= Σ0(FαµFβµ−1 4δαβFµηFµη). 10Clase 3 Fuerza de Lorentz como fuerza lagrangiana Las ecuaciones del movimiento de Euler-Lagrange son Qk=−∂L ∂qk+d dt/parenleftigg∂L ∂˙qk/parenrightigg (1) donde lasQkson las fuerzas externas o fuerzas generalizadas y L=T−U. Por otra parte, las ecuaciones de Maxwell en unidades de Gaus s son (M1) ∇ ×− →E+1 c∂− →B ∂t= 0 ( M3) ∇ ·− →D= 4πρ (M2) ∇ ×− →H−1 c∂− →D ∂t=4π c− →j (M4) ∇ ·− →B= 0. Ahora con− →F=q− →E=−q∇ϕs´ olo en electrostatica en general la fuerza es la ley de Lorentz o sea − →FL=q/parenleftbigg− →E+1 c− →v×− →B/parenrightbigg . (2) Ahora de la ( M4) encontramos que− →B=∇×− →Ay sustituyendo en ( M1) encontramos ∇ ×− →E+1 c∂ ∂t/parenleftbigg ∇ ×− →A/parenrightbigg = 0 (3) por tanto ∇ ×/parenleftigg− →E+1 c∂ ∂t− →A/parenrightigg = 0 (4) de aqui que podemos definir una funci´ on escalar tal que − ∇Φ =− →E+1 c∂ ∂t− →A (5) entonces − →FL=q/parenleftigg −∇Φ−1 c∂ ∂t− →A+1 c− →v×/parenleftbigg ∇ ×− →A/parenrightbigg/parenrightigg (6) 11donde el doble producto vectorial lo podemos expresar de la s iguiente forma − →v×/parenleftbigg ∇ ×− →A/parenrightbigg =∇/parenleftbigg− →v·− →A/parenrightbigg −d− →A dt+∂− →A ∂t(7) por tanto − →FL=q −∇Φ−1 c∂ ∂t− →A+1 c ∇/parenleftbigg− →v·− →A/parenrightbigg −d− →A dt+∂− →A ∂t   =q/parenleftigg −∇/bracketleftbigg Φ−1 c− →v·− →A/bracketrightbigg −1 cd dt/bracketleftbigg ∇− →v/parenleftbigg− →v·− →A/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg/parenrightigg lo que hace que− →FLse pueda escribir como fuerza lagrangiana − →FL=−∇U+d dt∂U ∂− →v(8) conU=qΦ−q c− →v·− →A. Electrodin´ amica no l´ ıneal Para la electrodinamica no l´ ıneal la constante dielectric a se expresa como εv=εo/parenleftig 1 +1 b2(c2B2−E2)1 2/parenrightig (9) y la permeabilidad se escribe como µv=µo/parenleftbigg 1 +1 b2/parenleftig c2B2−E2/parenrightig1 2/parenrightbigg (10) dondeben ambos casos es un parametro que fija una intensidad m´ axima de los campos. Al menos para campos que var´ ıan lentamente, en funci´ on de l os tensores de permeabilidades el´ ectricas y magn´ etica del vac´ ıo ten emos Di=/summationdisplay kεikEkyBi=/summationdisplay kµikHk (11) 12donde εik=εo/bracketleftigg δik+e4¯h 45πm4c72/parenleftig E2−c2B2/parenrightig δik+ 7c2BiBk/bracketrightigg +.... (12) µik=µo/bracketleftigg δik+e4¯h 45πm4c72/parenleftigg B2−E2 c2/parenrightigg δik+ 7EiEk/c2/bracketrightigg +..... (13) para el l´ ımite cl´ asico hacemos ¯ h→0 y estos efectos no lineales desaparecen al comparar con la expresi´ on cl´ asica en (9) y (10) encontra mos bq=√ 45π 2/radicaligg e2 4πεo¯hce 4πεor2o≈0.51e 4πεor2o= 0.51eG r2o(14) por tanto ro=e2 G mc2≈2.8×10−15metros (15) este es el radio cl´ asico del electr´ on. Ahora si tenemos varias cargas /contintegraldisplay− →E·− →n da =1 εo/summationdisplay iqi (16) y si tenemos distribuciones de carga /contintegraldisplay S− →E·− →n da =1 εo/integraldisplay Vρ/parenleftig− →x/parenrightig dV (17) dondeVes el v´ olumen enserrado por la superficie, ahora el teorema d e la divergencia nos dice que /contintegraldisplay S− →v·− →n da =/integraldisplay V∇ ·− →v dV (18) entonces aplicando este teorema en la ley de Gauss encontram os ∇ ·− →E=ρ εo(19) y esta es la forma diferencial de la ley de Gauss. 13Clase 5 Energ´ ıa potencial electrost´ atica y densidad de energ´ ıa ; capacitancia Imaginemos el caso en que una carga qies tra´ ıda desde al infinito hasta el punto/vector xi, localizado en una regi´ on del espacio donde se conoce el pot encial electrost´ atico Φ( /vector x). El trabajo realizado sobre esta carga es Wi=qiΦ(/vector xi). Ahora bien, si este potencial es provocado por la presencia d e otrasn−1 cargas, se tiene Φ(/vector xi) =1 4πǫ0n−1/summationdisplay j=1qj |/vector xi−/vector xj| y por tanto Wi=qi 4πǫ0n−1/summationdisplay j=1qj |/vector xi−/vector xj|. (1) Por un proceso mental similar, se puede ver que el trabajo tot al necesario para obtener el arreglo de ncargas, trayendo cada una desde infinito a una regi´ on del espacio originalmente vac´ ıa, es Wtotal=1 8πǫ0/summationdisplay i/summationdisplay jqiqj |/vector xi−/vector xj|(2) dondei,jtoman todos los valores entre 1 y n, exceptoi=j(autoenerg´ ıas). En el caso de una distribuci´ on continua de cargas es claro qu e Wtotal=1 8πǫ0/integraldisplay /integraldisplayρ(/vector x)ρ(/vector x′) |/vector x−/vector x′|d3xd3x′, (3) expresi´ on que puede reescribirse de varias formas: •En t´ erminos del potencial Wtotal=1 2/integraldisplay ρ(/vector x)Φ(/vector x)d3x. (4) 14•Utilizando la ecuaci´ on de Poisson: Wtotal=−ǫ0 2/integraldisplay Φ∇2Φd3x. (5) Integrando por partes la ´ ultima expresi´ on se obtiene Wtotal =ǫ0 2/integraldisplay |∇Φ|2d3x =ǫ0 2/integraldisplay |/vectorE|2d3x. (6) Por la forma de la ´ ultima integral, se define la densidad volu m´ etrica de energ´ ıa como w=ǫ0 2|/vectorE|2. Notemos que esta densidad de energ´ ıa es no negativa, y por ta nto el tra- bajo total tampoco ser´ a negativo. Sin embargo, de (1) se ve q ue el trabajo para hacer un arreglo con dos cargas de signo contrario es neg ativo; esta con- tradicci´ on surge porque en las expresiones (3 - 5) se incluy en las autoenerg´ ıas en el trabajo total, mientras que en el caso discreto (2) se la s excluye. Por ´ ultimo, como siempre, se puede calcular la fuerza a part ir de los cambios que sufre la energ´ ıa ante desplazamientos virtual es peque˜ nos. Consideremos un sistema de nconductores, el i−´ esimo de ellos con carga Qiy potencial Vi. Dada la relaci´ on lineal que existe entre el potencial y la carga, podemos escribir Vi=n/summationdisplay j=1pijQj, dondepijdepende s´ olo del arreglo geom´ etrico de los conductores. I nvirtiendo las ecuaciones anteriores se obtiene Qj=n/summationdisplay i=1CjiVi. Los coeficientes Ciison las capacitancias , yCij(i/ne}ationslash=j) los coeficientes de inducci´ on. De esta forma Wtotal =1 2n/summationdisplay i=1QiVi =1 2n/summationdisplay i,j=1CijViVj. 15Aproximaci´ on variacional a la soluci´ on de las ecua- ciones de Poisson y Laplace El uso de m´ etodos variacionales es muy popular en F´ ısica. L a electrodin´ amica no es la excepci´ on. En efecto, la idea de considerar funcion ales cuyos ex- tremales satisfagan ecuaciones de movimiento tipo Poisson o Laplace es muy sugestiva (sobre todo por la elegancia del m´ etodo variacio nal). Consideremos la funcional I[ψ] =1 2/integraldisplay V∇ψ· ∇ψd3x−/integraldisplay Vgψd3x, (7) sujeta a la condici´ on tipo Dirichlet δψ(S) = 0 (Ses la superficie cerrada que contiene a V). Es f´ acil ver que δI=I[ψ+δψ]−I[ψ] = 0 conduce a la ecuaci´ on de movimiento ∇2ψ=−g. Se ve que este problema no es otro que resolver la ecuaci´ on de Poisson con condiciones de frontera tipo Dirichlet. Similarmente, para condiciones de frontera tipo Neumann, s e plantea el funcional I[ψ] =1 2/integraldisplay V∇ψ· ∇ψd3x−/integraldisplay Vgψd3x−/contintegraldisplay Sfψd3x, (8) con /parenleftigg∂ψ ∂n/parenrightigg S=f(S). Es f´ acil probar que δI[ψ] = 0 conduce a las ecuaciones ∇2ψ=−g,/parenleftigg∂ψ ∂n/parenrightigg S=f(S). Resulta l´ ogico preguntar si este m´ etodo variacional de ob tener la ecuaci´ on de Poisson sirve para algo, o es s´ olo un juego matem´ atico. P ara contestar, notemos que una vez conocida la forma de los funcionales (7, 8 ) a´ un es necesario encontrar ψ(o sea resolver la ecuaci´ on de Poisson); por tanto el problema es el mismo. Sin embargo, se pueden proponer soluci onesψ= AΨ(/vector x,α,β,... ) que satisfagan las condiciones de frontera dadas, para des pu´ es 16variacionalmente encontrar las constantes indeterminada s (notar que con esta elecci´ onI=I[A,α,β,... ]). En este sentido el m´ etodo variacional sirve para encontrar soluciones aproximadas. 17Clase 6 M´ etodo de las im´ agenes Este m´ etodo se refiere a problemas de cargas puntuales en la p resencia de superficies a potencial cero o constante. Las condiciones de frontera se simu- lan con cargas puntuales de valores y posiciones bien determ inadas conocidas como “cargas im´ agenes”. Carga puntual con esfera a φ= 0 El potencial asociado a la carga real y la carga imagen es φ(x) =1 4πǫ0[q |x−y|+q′ |x−y′|]. La condici´ on de frontera es que el potencial se anule en |x|=a. Introducimos dos vectores unitarios n,n’, uno en la direcci´ on de xy el otro en la direcci´ on dey, de manera que el potencial se puede expresar φ(x) =1 4πǫ0[q |xn−yn′|+q′ |xn−yn′|]. Factorizando xdel primer t´ ermino, y′del segundo y valuando en x=a φ(x=a) =1 4πǫ0[q a|n−y an′|+q′ y′|n′−a y′n|]. Se observa que para que el potencial se anule en la frontera de la esfera se debe satisfacer q a=−q′ y′,y a=a y′ resolviendo estas ecuaciones se encuentra q′=−y′ aq=−a yq, y′=a2 y 18q′es la carga total de inducci´ on sobre la superficie de la esfer a, podemos observar adem´ as lo siguiente y→a⇒q′→ −q y→ ∞ ⇒q′→0 La densidad superficial de carga est´ a dada por σ=−ǫ0∂φ ∂x|x=a=q 4πa2a y1−a2 y2 (1 +a2 y2−2a ycosγ)3/2. Es posible calcular tambi´ en la fuerza de atracci´ on hacia l a esfera, la magnitud de la cual est´ a dada por |F|=1 4πǫ0q2 a2a3 y3/parenleftigg 1−a2 y2/parenrightigg−2 . Carga q en presencia de una esfera conductora cargada a Q, aislada El potencial para esta configuraci´ on se puede expresar as´ ı φ(x) =1 4πǫ0 q |x−y|−aq y|x−a2 y2y|+Q+a yq |x| . La fuerza de atracci´ on en este caso es F(y) =1 4πǫ0qy y3/bracketleftigg Q−qa3(2y2−a2) y(y2−a2)2/bracketrightigg . Carga q cerca de una esfera conductora a potencial constante Para la situaci´ on presente el potencial adopta la forma φ(x) =1 4πǫ0 q |x−y|−aq y|x−a2 y2y| +Va |x|. La fuerza de atracci´ on est´ a dada por F(y) =qy y3/bracketleftigg Va−1 4πǫ0qay3 (y2−a2)2/bracketrightigg . 19Esfera conductora en un campo el´ ectrico uniforme Un campo el´ ectrico uniforme es producido por ejemplo por do s cargas pun- tuales±Q localizadas en z=±RparaR→ ∞. Si ahora una esfera conduc- tora es colocada en el origen, el potencial ser´ a el debido a l as cargas ±Q en ∓R y sus im´ agenes ∓Qa Renz=∓a2 R φ=1 4πǫ0/bracketleftiggQ (r2+R2+ 2rRcosθ)1/2−Q (r2+R2−2rRcosθ)1/2/bracketrightigg + 1 4πǫ0 −aQ R/parenleftig r2+a4 R2+2a2r Rcosθ/parenrightig1/2+aQ R/parenleftig r2+a4 R2−2a2r Rcosθ/parenrightig1/2 . ComoR>>r podemos desarrollar los denominadores φ=1 4πǫ0/bracketleftigg −2Q R2rcosθ+2Q R2a3 r2cosθ/bracketrightigg +··· ParaR→ ∞,2Q 4πǫ0R2es el campo aplicado de manera que el potencial en este l´ ımite toma la forma φR→∞=−E0/parenleftigg r−a3 r2/parenrightigg cosθ=−E0z+a3 r3E0z , donde el ´ ultimo t´ ermino es el del ”dipolo imagen”. La densi dad superficial de carga est´ a dada por σ=−ǫ0∂φ ∂r|r=a= 3ǫ0E0cosθ , la cual se anula al integrarla sobre la superficie /integraldisplay σda= 0. 20Funci´ on de Green para la esfera conductora Para problemas de Dirichlet con conductores G(x,x′)/4πǫ0puede ser inter- pretada como el potencial debido a la distribuci´ on superfic ial de carga in- ducida sobre la superficie por la presencia de una carga puntu al (fuente) en el punto x’. Por definici´ on la funci´ on de Green G(x,x′) satisface la ecuaci´ on ▽′2G(x,x′) =−4πδ(x−x′). Para el caso de la esfera la funci´ on de Green est´ a dada por Gesf(x,x′) =1 |x−x′|−a x′|x−a2 x′2x′|. En coordenadas esf´ ericas lo anterior es Gesf(x,x′) =1 (x2+x′2−2xx′cosγ)1/2−1 /parenleftig x2x′2 a2+a2−2xx′cosγ/parenrightig1/2, ∂G ∂n′|x′=a=−x2−a2 a(x2+a2−2axcosγ)3/2∼σ . Recordando la soluci´ on de la ecuaci´ on de Poisson con condi ciones de Dirichlet para el potencial φ(x) =1 4πǫ0/integraldisplay Vρ(x′)GD(x,x′)d3x−1 4π/contintegraldisplay Sφ(x′)∂GD ∂n′da′ usando esto, podemos escribir la soluci´ on general para el p otencial de la esfera conductora para la cual conocemos el potencial en la f rontera φesf(x) =1 4π/integraldisplay φ(a,θ′,ϕ′)a(x2−a2) (x2+a2−2axcosγ)3/2dΩ′, donde cosγ= cosθcosθ′+ sinθsinθ′cos(ϕ−ϕ′). Para el interior de la esferax2−a2→a2−x2, y en el caso en el que se tienen distribuciones volum´ etricas de carga se tiene que tomar en cuenta la contri buci´ on de la integral de volumen. 21Clase 9 An´ alisis de elemento finito para resolver la ecuaci´ on de Poisson A continuaci´ on presentamos una breve introducci´ on al an´ alisis de ele- mento finito para resolver la ecuaci´ on de Poisson. Por simpl icidad en la presentaci´ on s´ olo consideramos problemas bidimensiona les. Primeramente esbozamos el m´ etodo de Galerkin para replant ear la ecua- ci´ on de Poisson, y dividir la regi´ on de estudio en una red cu yo n´ umero de celdas es finito. Por ´ ultimo presentamos dos tipos particul ares de redes: cuadriculada regular y triangular. El m´ etodo de Galerkin Sea una regi´ on bidimensional Rlimitada por una curva cerrada C; consider- emos enRla ecuaci´ on de Poisson ∇2ψ=−g (1) con condiciones de frontera tipo Dirichlet; multiplicamos (1) por una funci´ on de pruebaφ(x,y) que sea continua a trozos en Ry tal queφ(C) = 0; despu´ es integramos sobre R, obteniendo /integraldisplay R[φ∇2ψ+gφ]dxdy= 0. A continuci´ on, utilizando la primera identidad de Green (b idimensional), la integral anterior se reescribe como /integraldisplay R[∇φ· ∇ψ−gφ]dxdy= 0. (2) El siguiente paso es dividir la regi´ on Rpor medio de una red con Nceldas, y definir un conjunto de funciones {φi(x,y),i= 1,2,...,N}tal que cada una de ellas es no nula s´ olo en una celda particular de la red. A co ntinuaci´ on se expresaψcomo ψ(x,y)≈N/summationdisplay i=1Ψiφi(x,y); 22sustituyendo lo anterior en (2) y escogiendo φ=φjse obtiene N/summationdisplay i=1Ψi/integraldisplay ∇φi(x,y)· ∇φj(x,y) =g0/integraldisplay Rφi(x,y)dxdy , donde se ha supuesto que las celdas son suficientemente peque ˜ nas como para queg(x,y)≈g0dentro de ellas (el valor de g0var´ ıa de celda a celda). Con esto, (2) se reduce a la ecuaci´ on matricial KΨ =G (3) aqu´ ıKes una matriz N×Ncon elementos kij≡/integraldisplay R∇φi· ∇jdxdy Ψ es la matriz columna formada con los coeficientes Ψ i;Ges una matriz columna con elementos Gi≡gi/integraldisplay Rφi(x,y)dxdy. El poder del m´ etodo de Galerkin radica en que, por la forma co mo se escojen lasφi, la matriz Kes dispersa, i.e., s´ olo pocos de sus elementos son diferent es de cero, y por ello es relativamente f´ acil conocer Ψ a partir de (3), lo cual nos da la soluci´ on a la ecuaci´ on tipo Poisson (1). Casos particulares Red cuadriculada regular Se escoge una red de cuadros, cada uno de lado h; sean (xi,yj) las coordenadas de los v´ ertices. Se toman las funciones φij(x,y) tales que φij/ne}ationslash= 0 s´ olo en una vecindad de ´ area h2alrededor de ( xi,yj), y lasφij’s son linealmente independientes entre s´ ı. Con esto, de acuerdo al m´ etodo de Galerkin ψ≈(N0)/summationdisplay k,l=1Ψklφkl(x,y) 23donde se supone que el total de celdas es N0; los coeficientes Ψ klse obtienen a partir de (3) con K=/parenleftbigg/integraldisplay R∇φij· ∇φkldxdy/parenrightbigg , (G) =/parenleftbigg g(xi,yj)/integraldisplay Rφijdxdy/parenrightbigg (Ψ) = (Ψ i). La inconveniencia del uso de redes como ´ esta es que se presen tan casos donde el potencial var´ ıa de formas diferentes en diferente s regiones, y por ello ser´ ıa m´ as conveniente utilizar celdas irregulares. A con tinuaci´ on se presenta una de ellas. Red triangular Las redes triangulares son las m´ as utilizadas en el an´ alis is de elemento finito, por las razones expuestas al final de la secci´ on anterior. Pa ra este tipo de redes se asume que el elemento triangular ( e) es lo suficientemente peque˜ no como para que ψcambie poco en su interior y de hecho pueda ser aproximado de forma lineal en cada direcci´ on: ψ(x,y)≈ψe(x,y) =A+Bx+Cy. Sean (xi,yi) (i= 1,2,3) las coordenadas de cada v´ ertice del tri´ angulo. En- tonces las constantes ( A,B,C ) quedan determinadas por los valores de ψen cada uno de ellos. Con el fin de sistematizar el procedimiento, es conveniente d efinir las funciones de forma Nj(x,y) (una por cada v´ ertice), tales que N(e) j(xj,yj) = 1, N(e/negationslash=ej) j(x,y) = 0 yN(e) j(x,y) = 0 six/ne}ationslash=xj,y/ne}ationslash=yj. Por la linealidad de ψ dentro dee, tomamos N(e) j(x,y) =aj+bjx+cjy. De aqu´ ı, para j= 1 a1+b1x1+c1y1= 1 a1+b1x2+c1y2= 0 (4) a1+b1x3+c1y3= 0 de donde a1=1 2Se(x2y3−x3y2) 24b1=1 2Se(y2−y3) c1=−1 2Se(x2−x3) dondeSees el ´ area del tri´ angulo e. Ahora, siguiendo el m´ etodo de Galerkin, tomamos φi=N(e) i. De esta forma, expresamos ψcomo ψ(x,y)≈/summationdisplay f,jΨ(f) jN(f) j(x,y), (5) donde la suma se realiza para todos los tri´ angulos ( f) y todos los v´ ertices de cada tri´ angulo ( j); Ψ(f) jes el valor de ψen el v´ ertice jdel tri´ angulo f. Estos coeficientes se encuentran, para cada tri´ angulo, a partir d e una ecuaci´ on similar a (3): 3/summationdisplay j=1k(e) ijΨ(e) j=1 3Sege conk(e) ij≡Se(bibj+cicj) (coeficentes de acoplamiento); ge≡g(¯xe,¯ye), y (¯xe,¯ye) son las coordenadas del centro de gravedad del tri´ angulo. A contin- uaci´ on s´ olo falta incluir todos los tri´ angulos de la red. Para ello, considerando que los v´ ertices interiores a CsonN, y el total de v´ ertices (interiores a C y sobre ella) es N0, los ´ ındices corren de 1 a Npara los v´ ertices internos, y deN+ 1 aN0para los que est´ an sobre la frontera. Con esto, se obtiene la ecuaci´ on equivalente a (3) para toda la red es con K= (kij), k ii=/summationdisplay Tk(e) ii, k ij=/summationdisplay Ekij,i/ne}ationslash=j, Gi=1 3/summationdisplay TSege−N0/summationdisplay j=N+1k(e) ijΨ(e) j; Tindica que la suma es sobre los tri´ angulos con v´ ertice com´ uni;Eque la suma es sobre tri´ angulos con lados entre los v´ ertices i,j. Como ya se dijo, Kes una matriz dispersa, y por tanto la soluci´ on a (1) se puede encontrar como ψ(x,y)≈/summationdisplay f,jΨ(f) jN(f) j(x,y). 25

arXiv:physics/0005020v1 [physics.atom-ph] 9 May 2000Coherent transients in optical lattices O. Morsch∗, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, United K ingdom P.H. Jones, and D.R. Meacher Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College Lo ndon, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom (February 2, 2008) We use a method based on optical coherent transients to study the vibrational coherence lifetimes of atoms trapped in the potential wells of a near-resonant optical lattice in th e os- cillating regime. The dependence of the positions and width s of the vibrational Raman resonances of the coherent transie nt spectra on the intensity, detuning, and geometry of the latt ice beams is investigated and the results are compared with the- oretical predictions. It is shown that the principal source of broadening of the vibrational Raman resonances is the anhar - monicity of the light-shift potential wells. We also perfor m time-resolved measurements of the vibrational excitation of atoms equilibrating in an optical lattice. I. INTRODUCTION In optical lattices [1], atoms are trapped in a peri- odic array of micron-sized potential wells. Atoms con- fined in these potential wells exhibit a rich dynamical behaviour which can be probed by a number of tech- niques, including probe absorption spectroscopy [2], het- erodyne fluorescence spectroscopy [3], recoil-induced res - onances [4], intensity correlation spectroscopy [5,6], an d observation of the redistribution of photons between the lattice-inducing beams [7]. Using these techniques, the quantized nature of the motion of the atoms in the po- tential wells has been demonstrated, yielding information on the vibrational frequencies of the atoms, the motion of wavepackets, and on the decay of coherences between the bound oscillator states. Recently, a novel method has been suggested and experimentally demonstrated which effectively probes the coherences set up between differ- ent vibrational states of the trapped atoms [8,9]. This method has a number of advantages over other schemes, as we shall demonstrate. Most importantly, the possibil- ity of selectively exciting one particular dynamical mode of the lattice allows one to fit theoretical predictions to experimental spectra easily and reliably. In this paper we are predominantly concerned with res- onances of the coherent transient spectra corresponding to stimulated Raman transitions between adjacent vibra- tional levels. The mechanisms responsible for the decay of the vibrational coherences and the resulting widths of the Raman peaks are still a subject of debate, and a com- prehensive study is as yet absent from the literature. Inwhat follows, we present the results of our experiments conducted on a three-dimensional lattice of cesium atoms in the oscillating regime in which the oscillatory motion of the trapped atoms is only rarely interrupted by in- elastic photon scattering events. The converse case of optical lattices operating in the jumping regime has been treated by Mennerat-Robilliard and co-workers [10]. In our experiments the intensity, detuning, and geometry of the lattice were varied independently, and the resulting variations of the positions and widths of the vibrational Raman peaks were measured and compared with theo- retical models. In another set of experiments, we loaded an optical lat- tice with atoms having an initial kinetic temperature higher than the steady-state temperature in the lattice and made time-resolved measurements of the vibrational frequency as the atoms came to equilibrium in the lat- tice. As the distribution of atoms amongst the vibra- tional states evolved, the measured vibrational frequency was observed to change owing to the perturbations to the energy spacings of the bound levels caused by the anhar- monicity of the potential. This paper is organised as follows. In section II the exper- imental setup is described, and in section III we present the results of the experiments. Section IV contains a brief discussion of the various mechanisms involved in deter- mining the frequency widths of the vibrational Raman resonances observed in optical lattices and a comparison of the experimental data with theoretical models. Fi- nally, section V summarizes our findings. 1/X79 /X7A/X78/X32/X20/X71/X79 /X32/X20/X71/X78 /X70/X68/X6F/X74/X6F/X2D /X64/X69/X6F/X64/X65/X70/X72/X6F/X62/X65 /X62/X65/X61/X6D/X41/X4F/X4D /X6F/X73/X63/X69/X6C/X6C/X6F/X73/X63/X6F/X70/X65/X52/X46 /X73/X6F/X75/X72/X63/X65 FIG. 1. Experimental setup for a coherent transient mea- surement. II. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND PROCEDURE In our experiment, we trap and cool cesium atoms in a standard six-beam magneto-optical trap (MOT) operat- ing on the 6 S1/2(F= 4)→6P3/2(F′= 5) transition [11]. After a 1s trapping period, the magnetic field gradient is switched off and the atoms are further cooled for a few milliseconds in an optical molasses to a temperature of around 10 µK. The molasses beams are then switched off and the lattice beams switched on. The geometry of the lattice beams is the standard tetrahedron configura- tion [12,13] with splitting half-angles θxandθy, where in our experiment θyis fixed and θxis variable (see Fig. 1). The lattice operates on the same transition as the MOT, detuned to the low frequency side by 3Γ to 17Γ, where 1/Γ is the excited state lifetime (Γ = 2 π×5.22MHz for cesium). The intensity of the lattice beams in our exper- iment lies between 1 .5mWcm−2and 3.8mWcm−2. In ad- dition to the four lattice beams, a weak ( <0.1mWcm−2) probe beam propagates either along the x- or the z-axis. The detuning δof the probe laser from the lattice laser can be controlled by an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) connected to a tunable radio-frequency source. Coherent transient spectra are recorded as follows: After the atoms have equilibrated in the lattice for a few mil- liseconds, the probe beam is switched on for 20 −1000µs at detuning δ(see also section IV). After that time, at t= 0 the detuning is increased by 0 .9MHz within less than 1 µs. After the increase in the detuning of the probelight, it no longer interacts with the atoms and serves as a local oscillator for the heterodyne detection of the light scattered by the atoms in the lattice. The signal arising from the beating of the lattice light scattered by the atoms and the local oscillator is then recorded with a fast photodiode. Assuming that the coherently scattered light from the lattice decays exponentially with time at a rate Γ coh, the observed signal (expressed as a voltage V(t)) is of the form V(t)∝/radicalbig IprobeIcohexp(−Γcoht)cos[(∆ jump−δ)t] +1 2(Iprobe+Icoh),(1) where IprobeandIcohare the intensities of the probe and the coherently scattered light, respectively, and ∆ jump is the amount by which the probe frequency is suddenly switched at t= 0. A Fast-Fourier-Transform (FFT) is then performed on the signal to yield its frequency spec- trum. Our spectra are shifted by subtracting the fre- quency jump ∆ jump, so that a Rayleigh peak (for which δ= 0 initially) appears at zero frequency in our spectra. In the case of the time-resolved equilibration experiment described in section III C, the lattice is loaded directly from the MOT with a temperature of order 60 µK, and the atoms are then allowed to equilibrate in the lattice for a variable length of time. After this period the vi- brational excitation of the trapped atoms is probed and read-out as described above. (b)(a) RamanRayleigh 0 50 100 150 200 250-8-6-4-20246810photodiode signal (arb.units) time (µs)-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100-0.20.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.4FFT Power (arb.units) relative frequency (kHz)-100-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 10001234567 -100 0 1000.00.51.0FFT Power (arb.units) relative frequency (kHz)0 50 100 150 200 250-10-50510photodiode signal (arb.units) time (µs) 2FIG. 2. Typical experimental spectra of a Rayleigh (a) and a Raman (b) resonance obtained by the coherent transient method. In each case, a single feature of the complete spec- trum is selectively excited. The magnified plot inset in (a) shows more clearly the response around the frequencies of the vibrational Raman resonances. III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Some aspects of the dynamical behaviour of atoms in optical lattices are better understood than others. The vibrational frequencies of the atoms, for instance, can be rather accurately predicted and modelled using a simple harmonic oscillator picture (for potential wells that are deep enough for a tight-binding model to be valid) [12]. Discrepancies with experiments can be accounted for by the anharmonicity of the potential, which can be treated perturbatively [14]. On the other hand, the lifetimes of atoms in these oscilla- tor states and of the coherences between different states, and hence the widths they give rise to in the coherent transient spectra, are not yet well understood. Several mechanisms have been proposed that could be responsi- ble for the observed widths of these vibrational Raman peaks [15–17]. In particular, the photon scattering rate of atoms in a light field turns out to be much larger than the observed widths of the Raman peaks, indicating that the decay of coherences between vibrational levels is strongly suppressed. The mechanisms responsible for this sup- pression will be dealt with in more detail in section IVA. In order to carry out a comprehensive study, we inde- pendently varied the detuning, intensity, and geometry (characterized by the two splitting angles) of the lattice and determined both the position and the width of the Raman peaks in the coherent transient spectrum by fit- ting Lorentzians to the experimentally obtained spectra. Typical experimental results are shown in Fig. 2. The signal-to-noise ratio even of a single-shot measurement is good, so that little averaging is necessary. The signal recorded by the photodiode is, in general, a sum of expo- nentially damped beat-notes between the light scattered by the trapped atoms and the probe light. When the probe is initially tuned to the same frequency as the lat- tice beams, one sees a narrow Rayleigh peak and two peaks resulting from off-resonantly excited vibrational coherences. When detuning the probe from the lattice beams by an amount equal to the separation between a Raman peak and the Rayleigh peak (i.e. the vibra- tional frequency of the atoms), one can selectively excite the vibrational Raman coherences alone and hence ob- tain a spectrum that only reflects one excitation mode of the lattice, in contrast to probe absorption spectra, where resonances associated with many modes are su- perimposed. It is found that the resulting spectrum can be well fitted to a Lorentzian, and in what follows we will refer to the width (FWHM) of such a Lorentzian fit as the width of the Raman peak. A further advan-tage of the method of coherent transients is the fact that the preparation and the read-out of the vibrational co- herence grating are separated in time. The frequency- selectivity in the excitation phase therefore depends on the frequency bandwidth of the initial probe pulse, whilst the resolution of the spectrum only depends on the read- out time. By making the read-out time as short as pos- sible whilst maintaining a reasonable resolution, time- dependent studies of the evolution of atoms in an optical lattice can be performed. This is discussed in more detail in section III C. As can be seen in Fig. 2, the Rayleigh peaks are of much smaller width than the Raman peaks. These widths yield information on the rate of transfer of atoms between neighbouring wells and are discussed in detail in [15,9]. In this paper, however, we shall concentrate our atten- tion on the vibrational Raman peaks. (b)(a) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450102030405060708090 ΩxΩz I = 3.6 mWcm-2 I = 1.8 mWcm-2 ∆ = -12.2 Γ ∆ = -5.5 ΓΩ/2π(kHz) √U0/Erec 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900510152025303540455055 I = 3.6 mWcm-2 I = 1.8 mWcm-2 ∆ = -12.2 Γ ∆ = -5.5 Γ∆Ω/2π(kHz) Ω/2π(kHz) FIG. 3. Plot of the the vibrational frequencies (a) and the Raman widths (b). The potential well-depth was varied by changing either the intensity or the detuning of the lattice beams, keeping the other parameter constant. The widths in (b) are plotted against the vibrational frequencies. For cl arity, in (b) only two representative points have error bars. 3A. Varying intensity and detuning For a tetrahedral lattice (see Fig. 1) in which the po- larizations of the four lattice beams are perpendicular to the planes spanned by each pair of nearly co-propagating beams, one can derive simple expressions for the vibra- tional frequencies in a harmonic approximation of the potential close to a minimum [12,14]: Ωx,y=ωr/radicalbigg 88 45sinθx,y/radicalbigg U0 Er(2) and Ωz=ωr(cosθx+ cos θy)/radicalbigg U0 Er(3) where Er= ¯hωris the recoil energy with ωr= 2π× 2.07kHz for an optical lattice employing cesium atoms and light tuned close to the D2 resonance line and U0is the potential well-depth given by U0= ¯h∆4I/Isat 4(∆/Γ)2+ 1(4) (Iis the intensity of a single beam, Isat= 1.1mWcm−2, and ∆ = ωlaser−ω0is the detuning of the lattice beams). These theoretical predictions have been verified to yield the correct dependence on ∆, I, and θ, but the exper- imental results usually fall short of the theoretical val- ues by 15-25 percent. In our experiment, we varied the potential well-depth U0(ranging from U0≈250Erto U0≈2100Er) both by varying the intensity (between I= 1.5mWcm−2andI= 3.6mWcm−2) and the detun- ing (between ∆ = −3Γ and ∆ = −17Γ) and measured the positions of the Raman peaks of the corresponding coher- ent transient spectra along the x- and the z- directions. The results of these measurements are summarized in Fig. 3 (a) and confirm the dependence of the vibrational frequencies on U0as given by equations 2 and 3. The splitting half-angles in this experiment were θx= 41±1 degrees and θy= 38±1 degrees, and the ratio of the slopes of Fig. 3 (a) is 1 .83±0.05, which is close to the theoretically predicted value of 1 .67±0.06. The results of measurements of the Raman widths for the cases of the probe propagating along both the x- and the z-directions are shown in Fig. III A(b) where, for clar- ity, most of the error bars have been omitted [18]. For the most part, the width of the Raman peaks and the corresponding vibrational frequencies are proportional t o each other, with ∆Ω ≈0.45Ω. Only for frequencies above ≈70kHz do the Raman widths deviate appreciably from this simple relationship.(b)(a) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55048121620242832 experimental data linear fit ∆Ωx (kHz) Ωx/2π (kHz)0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.70510152025303540455055 experimental data linear fitΩx/2π (kHz) sin(θx) FIG. 4. Vibrational frequencies (a) and Raman widths (b) for different lattice geometries. The detuning and intensit y of the lattice beams are constant. In Fig.(b), the linear depen - dence of the Raman widths on the vibrational frequencies is clearly visible. B. Varying the geometry In order to investigate the dependence of the position and width of the Raman peaks on the geometry of the lattice, the intensity and detuning of the lattice beams (and hence U0) were kept fixed fixed at I= 3.6mWcm−2 and ∆ = −7Γ, respectively, and the splitting-angle θx was varied. This resulted in a change in the lattice con- stants in the x- and z-directions. In our setup, θxcould be varied between 15 ±1 and 40 ±1 degrees, which accord- ing to equations 2 and 3 should result in a large variation in Ω x,y, but only a small variation in Ω z. Figure 4 (a) shows the results of the measurements of Ω xas a function of sin θx. As expected, there is a linear relationship, and again the experimentally measured frequencies lie about 20 percent below the theoretical values. The measurements of the Raman widths as a function 4of geometry are summarized in Fig. 4 (b), where ∆Ω x is plotted against Ω x. As before, there is a linear rela- tionship between the two, with ∆Ω x≈0.53Ωx. Within the experimental errors, this agrees with the empirical constant of proportionality found in section III A. (b)(a) 0 10 20 30 40 50262728293031323334353637position of Raman peak (kHz) lattice duration (ms)0 10 20 30 40 50010203040506070T (µK) lattice duration (ms) FIG. 5. Equilibration of atoms in an optical lattice loaded directly from a MOT with T≈60µK, and the change with time in the temperature (a) and observed vibrational fre- quency (b) of the atoms is recorded. C. Time-resolved probing of the lattice evolution In most of the work previously carried out on the ex- citation modes of atoms in optical lattices, the atoms were allowed to reach equilibrium in the potential wells before measurements were performed. To demonstrate that we can use the coherent transient technique for time-resolved, high-resolution spectroscopic studies, w e loaded our lattice directly from the MOT, skipping the molasses phase. The temperature of the atoms released from the MOT was about 60 µK. The lattice was then switched on for a variable amount of time, after which either the temperature was measured (using the time- of-flight method [19]), or a coherent transient spectrumwas recorded in about 1ms. Figure 5 shows the results of the corresponding temperature and vibrational frequency measurements. The temperature of the atoms reaches its steady-state value governed by the lattice parameters in a few milliseconds [20]. At the same time, the measured vi- brational frequency of the atoms increases as the atoms are cooled and then approaches as steady-state value. These results can alternatively be visualized by plotting the measured vibrational frequency against temperature (Fig. 6). Evidently, the colder the atoms are, the higher is the observed vibrational frequency. This can be under- stood in terms of the anharmonicity of the lattice poten- tial, as will be explained in more detail in section IVB. Briefly, the hotter the atoms are, the larger the popu- lation of higher-lying (and more anharmonically shifted) vibrational states in the potential wells will be, which results in a lower observed vibrational frequency. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18262728293031323334353637 experimental data linear fitposition of Raman peak (kHz) T (µK) FIG. 6. Variation of the observed vibrational frequency of the atoms with temperature. The dotted line is a linear fit to the data. IV. THEORETICAL DISCUSSION A. Mechanisms contributing to the width of the vibrational Raman peaks As mentioned before, whereas the dependence of the vibrational frequencies on the lattice parameters is well understood and can be theoretically modelled, the widths of the Raman peaks of the spectra have so far resisted a comprehensive explanation. In this section, we shall sum- marize the models proposed so far and discuss them in the light of our findings. Also, we give a brief overview of the results obtained by other groups and compare them to our own experimental results. The first rate to consider when dealing with the life- times of vibrational levels in optical lattices and coher- ences between those levels is the photon scattering rate 5Γ′= ΓU0/¯h∆. After the first observation of distinct Ra- man resonances in probe-absorption spectra it was soon realized that the lifetimes could not be determined by Γ′ since that would have meant that (for most experimental parameters) the resonances would not have been resolv- able. The experimentally observed widths, however, were more than an order of magnitude smaller than those pre- dicted by the photon scattering rate. Courtois et al. [15] proposed the Lamb-Dicke effect [21] arising from sub- wavelength localization of the atoms as an explanation for the unexpected narrowness of the resonances [22]. According to this theory, the rate of inelastic scattering events in which the vibrational quantum number changes is reduced by the Lamb-Dicke factor ( n+ 1)Er/¯hΩ in favour of elastic scattering events involving no change in vibrational level. For typical parameters, the Lamb- Dicke factor is of the order of 1 /10 or less, so that the inelastic scattering rate Γ′′∝Γ′(n+1)Er/¯hΩ comes close to the experimentally observed widths. In experiments involving shallow potentials with small Lamb-Dicke pa- rameters, however, Kozuma et al. still found lifetimes that were much longer than predicted by the Lamb-Dicke model. Phillips et al. interpreted this as evidence for the existence of the transfer in inelastic scattering processe s of coherence between different pairs of vibrational lev- els. Also, results of other experiments suggested that the broadening of the vibrational Raman resonances was dominated by the anharmonicity of the lattice potential, which was further demonstrated through the observation of revivals in wavepacket oscillations. In the following, we will show that our experiments support that inter- pretation. Before discussing the experimental findings in detail, however, we shall give a brief outline of the effects of anharmonicity in optical lattices. B. Effects of anharmonicity When deriving the expressions for the vibrational fre- quencies of atoms in optical lattices (equations 2 and 3), the true light-shift potentials are often approximated by harmonic potentials characterized by the curvature of the lattice potentials close to a local minimum. The effect of the anharmonicity of the potential can be treated pertur- batively by considering the correction due to the fourth- order term in the expansion of the potential in first-order perturbation theory. Taking into account the geometrical factor sin θxcharacterizing the lattice constant in the x- direction, this leads to the vibrational frequency Ω n,n+1 associated with a pair of adjacent vibrational levels char- acterized by nandn+ 1 being reduced with respect to the harmonic frequency Ω 0so that Ωn,n+1≈Ω0−ωr(n+ 1)sin2θx. (5) Assuming that in an optical lattice the vibrational lev- els are populated according to a Boltzmann distribu- tion [23], and that the ratio C=kBT/2U0is a constant(as has been shown experimentally [14]), the effect of the anharmonicity on the experimentally observed Ra- man resonances can be estimated. Firstly, the observed vibrational frequency can be defined as an average over all the anharmonically shifted pairs of vibrational levels , weighted by their respective Boltzmann factors, leading to the following expression [14]: Ω≈Ω0(1−2C+...). (6) This indicates that all the vibrational frequencies should be reduced by a constant fraction, and that that frac- tion will be proportional to the temperature Tof the atoms in the lattice for a constant well-depth U0. This satisfactorily accounts for our observations presented in section III C. Likewise, the broadening of the resonance due to the pres- ence of several vibrational frequencies can be modelled by assuming that only levels with a Boltzmann factor (rela- tive to that for n= 0) larger than some small, arbitrary number bcontribute appreciably to the observed spec- trum. The most shifted vibrational frequency, which is a measure of the frequency spread, is then given by ∆Ω≈sinθxCln(b−1)ωr/radicalbigg U0 Er=C 2ln(b−1)Ω0.(7) This is proportional to the vibrational frequency Ω 0for any value of b, so that we would expect that the true linewidth, calculated from a properly weighted sum over all vibrational levels, also to be proportional to Ω 0. This is precisely what we observe in our experiments. Figure 7 illustrates the dependence of the vibrational frequency and width of the Raman peak on the geometrical factor sinθx. In a more quantitative treatment, we have per- formed numerical simulations of the coherent transient spectra taking into account the frequency spread by su- perposing the contributions of all possible pairs of vibra- tional levels. The results exhibit the same characteristic s as the qualitative models described above. In principle, the anharmonicity of the potential should also manifest itself in an asymmetry of the Raman peak. One expects a slower drop-off of the Raman peak on the low frequency side because the anharmonic shifts are all in the same direction (see equation 5). This effect, how- ever, will only be noticeable if the frequency spread due to anharmonicity is appreciable compared to the widths of the individual contributions, which are caused by the dissipative mechanisms described above. In our experi- ments, we have not found any clear evidence of an asym- metry of the Raman peaks. In Fig. 7, however, the Lorentzian fit to the broader Raman peak (b) has a larger χ2-value then the narrower peak (a), which suggests that the former is distorted by anharmonicity. 6-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20012345 θx = 15OFFT Power (arb.units) relative frequency (kHz)(b)(a) -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 200246810 θx = 40OFFT Power (arb.units) relative frequency (kHz) FIG. 7. Example of Raman peaks for two different geome- tries of the lattice with identical detuning and intensity o f the lattice beams. When the splitting-angle is increased, both the position and the width of the Raman peak change. The dot- ted lines are Lorentzian fits. C. Comparison of theory and experiment One of the main objectives of our experiments was to determine the dominant mechanism involved in deter- mining the width of the Raman resonances in the coher- ent transient spectra. In particular, we were interested in establishing whether the Lamb-Dicke model correctly predicted the dependence of the widths on all the experi- mental parameters. Since our experiment was performed on a 3-D lattice, whereas the Lamb-Dicke treatment of Courtois et al. is based on calculations in one dimension, we have generalized that derivation to take into account the dependence of the lattice constant on the geometry of the lattice. This leads to the appearance of an extra geometrical factor sin θxin the expression for the rate Γ′′(n) of inelastic Raman processes leading to a change in the external state of the atom along the x-directionfrom an initial state with vibrational quantum number, n, which then becomes Γ′′(n)∝Γ′sinθx(n+ 1)/radicalbigg Er U0. (8) This reproduces the observed linear dependence of ∆Ω on Ω when the splitting-angle θxis varied (see section III B). It also turns out that when the lattice intensity is varied, the expression for Γ′′reduces to Γ′′∝Ω. When U0is varied by changing the detuning, however, the relation- ship between Ω and Γ′′(and hence ∆Ω) is expected to be of the form Γ′′∝Ω3(for large detuning), which is not at all what we observe. In fact, upon closer inspection the values of ∆Ω for identical Ω but different detuning do differ slightly from each other, the value of ∆Ω for the larger detuning being smaller, as expected. The dif- ference, however, is very small and does not reflect the predicted Ω3-dependence. This is perhaps only to be ex- pected because, for the case of the largest detunings used in these experiments, the proximity of the neighbouring F= 4→F′= 4 transition means that our approxi- mation of an isolated transition is of dubious validity. Nevertheless, we find that the observed dependence of ∆Ω on Ω agrees very well with broadening due to anhar- monicity, as derived above. These observations suggest that the main broadening mechanism is, indeed, the an- harmonicity of the potential, and the dissipative mech- anisms based on inelastic photon scattering are strongly suppressed. In the harmonic limit, where the homoge- neous width is small compared to the anharmonic fre- quency difference between successive vibrational levels, the suppression of line-broadening because of the trans- fer of vibrational coherence [24] between pairs of levels in spontaneous Raman processes is expected to be ap- preciable. The lifetimes of the vibrational coherences are then determined by the cooling rate, rather than by the inelastic photon scattering rate, which in the oscillating regime is given by Γ cool= 4ΓEr/¯h∆ [17] and, in our ex- periments varies between 3kHz for small detuning to less than 1kHz for the largest detuning employed. For large detuning, the associated width is given by ∆Ω ∝Ω2. Conversely, in the anharmonic limit, it is the spatial lo- calization that is expected to give rise to the suppres- sion of inelastic Raman processes. Clearly, the interplay between the transfer of coherence, the Lamb-Dicke nar- rowing and the line broadening mechanisms is hard to model quantitatively for an intermediate case. Never- theless, our results strongly suggest that the broadening associated with the anharmonicity generally dominates the widths of the Raman peaks, with dissipative mecha- nisms contributing at a much reduced level. V. CONCLUSION We used the method of coherent transients in order to measure the vibrational frequencies of atoms in optical 7lattices and the widths associated with the corresponding Raman peaks of the coherent transient spectra. Vary- ing the intensity, detuning, and geometry of the lattices beam, we confirmed the validity of the theoretical predic- tions for the vibrational frequencies based on a harmonic oscillator model of the potential wells. Our measure- ments of the Raman widths as a function of intensity, detuning, and geometry all yielded a linear dependence on the vibrational frequencies, which strongly suggests that anharmonicity is the main broadening mechanism. This implies that the decay of the coherence between ad- jacent vibrational levels is suppressed, which we ascribe to the combined effects of the transfer of coherence be- tween pairs of vibrational levels in inelastic Raman pro- cesses and the suppression of the inelastic rate arising from the sub-optical wavelength spatial localization. The anharmonicity was also found to be responsible for a re- duction in the observed vibrational frequencies relative to the predictions of a harmonic model, which was tested by measuring the vibrational frequencies of ensembles of atoms with different temperatures in otherwise identical optical lattices. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank D. Lucas, G. Birkl, and M. Oberthaler for stimulating discussions and D. Smith for help with the electronics. This work was supported by the EPSRC (UK). O.M. gratefully acknowledges support by the Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes. ∗Current address: Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita di Pisa, Via Buonarroti 2, I-56127 Pisa, Italy. [1] For reviews of optical lattices, see P.S. Jessen and I. H. Deutsch, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 3795 (1996); D.R. Meacher, Contemp.Phys. 39(5), 329 (1998); L. Guidoni and P. Verkerk, J. Opt. B 1R23 (1999). [2] G. Grynberg, B. Lounis, P. Verkerk, J.-Y. Courtois, and C. Salomon, Phys.Rev.Lett. 70, 2249 (1993) [3] P.S. Jessen, C. Gerz, P.D. Lett, W.D. Phillips, S.L. Rolston, R.J.C. Spreeuw, and C.I. Westbrook, Phys.Rev.Lett. 69, 49 (1992) [4] M. Kozuma, Y. Imai, K. Nakagawa, and M. Ohtsu, Phys.Rev.A. 52, R3421 (1995) [5] C. Jurczak, B.Desruelle, K. Sengstock, J.-Y. Courtois, C.I. Westbrook, and A. Aspect, Phys.Rev.Lett. 77, 1727 (1996) [6] C.I. Westbrook, C. Jurczak, G. Birkl, B. Desruelle, W.D. Phillips, and A. Aspect, J.Mod.Opt. 44, 1837 (1997) [7] G. Raithel, W.D. Phillips, and S.L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3615 (1998)[8] C. Trich´ e, L. Guidoni, P. Verkerk, and G. Grynberg, in OSA TOPS on Ultracold Atoms and BEC, 1996, Vol. 7, ed. K. Burnett (1997), 82. [9] C. Trich´ e, Ph.D. thesis, Paris 1997 (unpublished) [10] C. Mennerat-Robilliard, L. Guidoni, J.-Y. Courtois an d G. Grynberg, Europhys. Lett. 38, 429 (1997) [11] E.L. Raab, M. Prentiss, A. Cable, S. Chu, and D.E. Pritchard, Phys.Rev.Lett. 59, 2631 (1987) [12] K.I. Petsas, A.B. Coates, and G. Grynberg, Phys.Rev.A 50, 5173 (1994) [13] P. Verkerk, D.R. Meacher, A.B. Coates, J.Y. Courtois, S. Guibal, B. Lounis, C. Salomon, and G. Grynberg, Eu- rophys.Lett. 26, 171 (1994) [14] M. Gatzke, G. Birkl, P.S. Jessen, A. Kastberg, S.L. Rol- ston, and W.D. Phillips, Phys.Rev.A. 55, R3987 (1997) [15] J.-Y. Courtois and G. Grynberg, Phys.Rev.A. 46, 7060 (1992) [16] G. Grynberg and C. Trich´ e, in Proceedings of the Inter- national School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Course CXXXI (1995), ed. A. Aspect, W. Barletta, and R. Bonifacio, IOS Press, Amsterdam 1996 [17] W.D. Phillips and C.I. Westbrook, Phys.Rev.Lett. 78, 2676 (1997) [18] The errors on Ω and ∆Ω stem from the uncertainty in the fitting of the Lorentzian to the spectra. The smaller the detuning, the greater the uncertainty due to the noise on the signal. The uncertainty in the intensity measurements was about 10 percent. [19] C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, W.D. Phillips, A. Clairon, and S. Guellati, Europhys. Lett. 12,683 (1990) [20] As in [14], we found a linear dependence of Ton the potential well-depth U0. [21] R.H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 89, 472 (1953) [22] This result is already contained implicitly in an earli er paper by Castin et al. [25]. [23] Yvan Castin, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e Paris VI, 1992 ( un- published) [24] C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, 1992,Atom-Photon Interactions (New York: Wiley) [25] Y. Castin and J. Dalibard, Europhys. Lett. 14, 761 (1991) 8

arXiv:physics/0005022v1 [physics.acc-ph] 9 May 2000LAL/RT 00-01 February 2000 ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF THE EMITTANCE GROWTH IN THE MAIN LINACS OF FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS Jie Gao Laboratoire de l’Acc´ el´ erateur Lin´ eaire IN2P3-CNRS et Universit´ e de Paris-Sud, BP 34, F-91898 Orsa y Cedex Abstract In this paper the single and multibunch emittance growths in the main linac of a linear collider are analytically treated in analogy to the Brownia n motion of a molecule, and the analytical formulae for the emittance growth due to acceler ating structure misalignment errors are obtained by solving Langevin equation. The same s et of formulae is derived also by solving directly Fokker-Planck equation. Comparisons w ith numerical simulation results are made and the agreement is quite well. 1 Introduction To achieve the required luminosity in a future e+e−linear collider one has to produce two colliding beams at the interaction point (IP) with extremel y small transverse beam dimensions. According to the linear collider design principles describ ed in ref. 1, the normalized beam emittance in the vertical plane (the normalized beam emitta nce in the horizontal plane is larger) at IP can be expressed as: γǫy=n4 γre 374δ∗ Bα4(1) where γis the normalized beam energy, re= 2.82×10−15m is the classical electron radius, α= 1/137 is the fine structure constant, δ∗ Bis the maximum tolerable beamstrahlung en- ergy spread, and nγis the mean number of beamstrahlung photons per electron at I P. Taking δ∗ B= 0.03 and nγ= 1, one finds γǫy= 8.86×10−8mrad. To produce beams of this small trans- verse emittance damping rings seem to be the only known facil ities which have the potential to do this job. The questions now are that once a beam of this smal l emittance is produced at the exit of the damping ring, how about the emittance growth duri ng the long passage through the accelerating structures and the focusing channels from the damping ring at the beam energy of few GeV to the IP with the beam energy of a few hundred of GeV, an d how to preserve it ? 1Many works have been dedicated to answer these questions [2] [3][4][5]. To start with, in sections 2, 3, and 4, we consider the short range wakefield ind uced single bunch emittance growth and try to calculate the emittance growth by using two different methods, and show that the two methods give the same results. Since the number o f accelerating structures in the main linac of a linear collider is very large, the transverse random kicks on the particles can be described statistically. Firstly, we make use of the analog y between the transverse motion of a particle in a linear accelerator with the Brownian motion o f a molecule, which are governed by Langevin equation. Secondly, we solve directly Fokker-P lanck equation. What should be noted is that both methods are physically consistent. As a na tural extension, multibunch case is treated in section 5. Comparisons with some numerical sim ulation results are made in section 6. 2 Equation of transverse motion The differential equation of the transverse motion of a bunch with zero transverse dimension is given as: d2y(s,z) ds2+1 γ(s,z)dγ(s,z) dsdy(s,z) ds+k(s,z)2y(s,z) =1 m0c2γ(s)e2Ne/integraldisplay∞ zρ(z′)W⊥(s,z′−z)y(s,z′)dz′(2) where k(s,z) is the instantaneous betatron wave number at position s,zdenotes the particle longitudinal position inside the bunch, and/integraltext∞ −∞ρ(z′)dz′= 1. Now we rewrite eq. 2 as follows: d2y(s,z) ds2+ Γdy(s,z) ds+k(s,z)2y(s,z) = Λ (3) where Γ =γ(0)G γ(s,z),G=eEz m0c2γ(0),Ezis the effective accelerating gradient in the linac, Λ =e2NeW⊥(s,z)y(s,0) m0c2γ(s,z),W⊥(s,z) =/integraltext∞ zρ(z′)W⊥(s,z′−z)dz′, and y(s,0) is the deviation of the bunch head with respect to accelerating structures center. In this section we consider the case where the injected bunch, quadrupoles and beam position mon itors are well aligned, while the accelerating structures are misaligned. As a consequence, y(s,0) is a random variable exactly the same as random accelerating structure misalignment errors with< y(s,0)>= 0 (< >denotes the average over s). If we take zas a parameter and regard Γ, k(s,z), and Λ as adiabatical variables with respect to s, eq. 3 can be regarded as Langevin equation which governs the Brownian motion of a molecule. 3 Method one: Langevin equation To make an analogy between the movement of the transverse mot ion of an electron and that of a molecule, we define P=e2NeW⊥(s,z)ls m0c2γ(s,z), and regard y(s,0)Pas the particle’s ”velocity” random increment (∆dy ds) over the distance ls, where lsis the accelerating structure length. What we are interested is to assume that the random accelerating str ucture misalignment error follows Gaussian distribution: f(y(s,0)) =1√ 2πσyexp/parenleftBigg −y(s,0)2 2σ2y/parenrightBigg (4) and the velocity ( u) distribution of the molecule follows Maxwellian distribu tion: g(u) =/radicalbiggm 2πkTexp/parenleftBigg −mu2 2kT/parenrightBigg (5) 2where mis the molecule’s mass, kis the Boltzmann constant, and Tis the absolute temperature. The fact that the molecule’s velocity follows Maxwellian di stribution permits us to get the distribution function for Λ ls[6]: φ(Λls) =1√4πqlsexp/parenleftBigg −Λ2l2 s 4qls/parenrightBigg (6) where q= ΓkT m(7) By comparing eq. 6 with eq. 4, one gets: 2σ2 y=4qls P2(8) or kT m=σ2 yP2 2lsΓ(9) Till now one can use all the analytical solutions concerning the random motion of a molecule governed by eq. 3 by a simple substitution described in eq. 9. Under the condition, k2(s,z)>> Γ2 4(adiabatic condition), one gets [6]: < y2>=kT mk2(s,z)+/parenleftbigg y2 0−kT mk2(s,z)/parenrightbigg/parenleftbigg cos(k1s) +Γ 2k1sin(k1s)/parenrightbigg2 exp(−Γs) =σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)Gk2(s,z)/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 +  y2 0−σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)Gk2(s,z)/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 /parenleftbigg cos(k1s) +Γ 2k1sin(k1s)/parenrightbigg2 exp(−Γs) (10) < y′2>=kT m+k(s,z) k2 1/parenleftbigg y2 0−kT mk2(s,z)/parenrightbigg sin2(k1s)exp(−Γs) =σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)Gk2(s,z)/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 + k(s,z) k2 1 y2 0−σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)Gk2(s,z)/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 sin2(k1s)exp(−Γs) (11) < yy′>=k(s,z)2 k1/parenleftbiggkT mk(s,z)2−y2 0/parenrightbigg/parenleftbigg cos(k1s) +Γ 2k1sin(k1s)/parenrightbigg exp(−Γs) =k(s,z)2 k1 σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)Gk2(s,z)/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 −y2 0 × /parenleftbigg cos(k1s) +Γ 2k1sin(k1s)/parenrightbigg exp(−Γs) (12) where k1=/radicalBig k(s,z)2−1 4Γ2. The asymptotical values for < y2>,< y′2>, and < yy′>as s→ ∞ are approximately expressed as: < y2>=kT mk2(s,z)=σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)Gk2(s,z)/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 (13) 3< y′2>=k2(s,z)< y2>=σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)G/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 (14) < yy′>= 0 (15) Inserting eqs. 13, 14, and 15 into the definitions of the r.m.s . emittance and the normalized r.m.s. emittance shown in eqs. 16 and 17: ǫrms=/parenleftBig < y2>< y′2>−< yy′>2/parenrightBig1/2(16) ǫn,rms=γ(s,z)/parenleftBig < y2>< y′2>−< yy′>2/parenrightBig1/2(17) one gets ǫrms=σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)Gk(s,z)/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 (18) and ǫn,rms=σ2 yls 2γ(0)Gk(s,z)/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 (19) The effects of energy dispersion within the bunch can be discu ssed through γ(s,z),k2(s,z), andW⊥(z), such as BNS damping [3]. From eqs. 13, 18, and 19 one finds tha t there are three convenient types of variations of k(s,z) with respect to s. If one takes k2(s,z)γ(s,z) = k2(0,z)γ(0,z), one gets < y2>independent of s. If one takes, however, k(s,z)γ(s,z) = k(0,z)γ(0,z),ǫrmsis independent of s, and finally, if k(s,z) =k(0,z), one has ǫn,rms is in- dependent of s. One takes usually the first scaling law in accordance with BN S damping. To calculate the emittance growth of the whole bunch one has to m ake an appropriate average over the bunch, say Gaussian as assumed above, as follows: ǫbunch n,rms=/integraltext∞ −∞ρ(z′)ǫn,rms(z′)dz′ /integraltext∞ −∞ρ(z′)dz′(20) To make a rough estimation one can replace ρ(z) by a delta function δ(z−zc), and in this case the bunch emittance can be still expressed by eq. 19 with W⊥(z) replaced by W⊥(zc), where zc is the center of the bunch. 4 Method two: Fokker-Planck equation Keeping the physical picture described above in mind, one ca n start directly with Fokker-Planck equation which governs the distribution function of the Mar kov random variable, y′: ∂F(s,y′) ∂s=−∂ ∂y′/parenleftbigAF(s,y′)/parenrightbig+1 2∂2 ∂y′2(DF(s,y′)) (21) with A=<<∆y′>> ls(22) D=<<(∆y′)2>> ls(23) where ∆ y′is the increment of y′overls, and<< >> denotes the average over a large number of a given type of possible structure misalignment error distri butions (in numerical simulations, this average corresponds to the average over the results obtaine d from a large number of different 4seeds, for a given type of structure misalignment error dist ribution function, say, Gaussian distribution). From eq. 3 one gets the increment of y′overls: ∆y′= (1−exp(−Γls 2))y′+ Γls (24) In consequence, one obtains: <<(∆y′)>>≈(1−exp(−Γls 2))y′(25) <<(∆y′)2>>≈(1−exp(−Γls 2))2y′2+<<(Λls)2>>exp(−Γls) (26) where <<Γls>>= 0 has been used. Inserting eqs. 25 and 38 into eq. 21, one gets : ls∂F(s,y′) ∂s=−(1−exp(−Γls 2))∂y′F(s,y′) ∂y′ +(1−exp(−Γls 2))2 2∂2(y′2F(s,y′)) ∂y′2+<<(Λls)2>> 2exp(−Γls)∂2F ∂y′2(27) Multiplying both sides with y′2and integrating over y′, one has: lsd < y′2> ds=−(1−exp(−Γls))< y′2>+<<(Λls)2>>exp(−Γls) (28) Assuming that Γ ls<<1, eq. 28 is reduced to: lsd < y′2> ds=−Γls< y′2>+<<(Λls)2>> (29) Solving eq. 29, one gets: < y′2>=<<Λ2>> l s 2Γ(1−exp (−Γs)) + exp ( −Γs)y′2 0 (30) where y′ 0is the initial condition. Apparently, when s→ ∞, one has: < y′2>∞=<<Λ2>> l s 2Γ=σ2 yls 2γ(s,z)γ(0)G/parenleftBigg e2NeW⊥(z) m0c2/parenrightBigg2 (31) where σ2 y=<< y(s,0)2>>. Eq. 31 is the same as what we have obtained in eq. 14. In fact, b y solving directly Fokker-Planck equation we obtain the same set of asymptotical formulae derived in section 3. 5 Multibunch emittance growth Physically, the multibunch emittance growth is quite simil ar to that of the single bunch case, and each assumed point like bunch in the train can be regarded as a slice in the previously described single bunch. Obviously, the slice emittance exp ressed in eq. 19 should be a good starting point for us to estimate the emittance growth of the whole bunch train. Before making use of eq. 19 let’s first look at the differential equation whic h governs the transverse motions of the bunch train: d ds/parenleftbigg γn(s)dyn ds/parenrightbigg +γn(s)k2 nyn=e2Ne m0c2n−1/summationdisplay i=1WT((n−i)sb)yi (32) 5where the subscript ndenotes the bunch number, sbis the distance between two adjacent bunches, Neis the particle number in each bunch, WT(s) is the long range wakefield produced by each point like bunch at distance of s. Clearly, the behaviour of the ithbunch suffers from influences coming from all the bunches before it, and we will t reat one bunch after another in an iterative way. First of all, we discuss about the long range w akefields. Due to the decoherence effect in the long range wakefield only the first dipole mode wil l be considered. For a constant impedance structure as shown in Fig. 1, one has: WT,1(s) =2ck1 ω1a2sin(ω1s c)exp/parenleftbigg −ω1 2Q1/parenleftbiggs c/parenrightbigg/parenrightbigg exp/parenleftBigg −ω2 1σ2 z 2c2/parenrightBigg (33) where σzis the rms bunch length ( σzis used to calculate the transverse wake potential, and the point charge assumption is still valid), ω1andQ1are the angular frequency and the loaded quality factor of the dipole mode, respectively. The loss fa ctork1in eq. 33 can be calculated analytically as [7]: k1=hJ2 1/parenleftbigu11 Ra/parenrightbig ǫ0πDR2J2 2(u11)S(x1)2(34) S(x) =sinx x(35) x1=hu11 2R(36) where Ris the cavity radius, ais the iris radius, his the cavity hight as shown in Fig. 1, and u11= 3.832 is the first root of the first order Bessel function. h 2a 2R D Figure 1: A disk-loaded accelerating structure. To reduce the long range wakefield one can detune and damp the c oncerned dipole mode. The resultant long range wakefield of the detuned and damped stru cture (DDS) can be expressed as: WT,DDS (s) =1 NcNc/summationdisplay i=12ck1,i ω1,ia2 isin(ω1,is c)exp/parenleftBigg −ω1,i 2Q1,i/parenleftbiggs c/parenrightbigg/parenrightBigg exp/parenleftBigg −ω2 1,iσ2 z 2c2/parenrightBigg (37) where Ncis the number of the cavities in the structure. When Ncis very large one can use following formulae to describe ideal uniform and Gaussian d etuning structures [8]: 1) Uniform detuning: WT,1,U= 2< K > sin/parenleftbigg2π < f 1> s c/parenrightbiggsin(πs∆f1/c) (πs∆f1/c)exp/parenleftbigg −π < f 1> s < Q > 1c/parenrightbigg (38) 2) Gaussian detuning: WT,1,G= 2< K > sin/parenleftbigg2π < f > s c/parenrightbigg e−2(πσfs/c)2exp/parenleftbigg −π < f > s < Q > 1c/parenrightbigg (39) 6where K=ck1,i ω1,ia2 i,f1=ω1 2π, ∆f1is full range the synchronous frequency spread due to the detuning effect, σfis the rmswidth in Gaussian frequency distribution. Once the long range wakefield is known one can use eq. 13 to esti mate< y2 i>in an iterative way, and the emittance of the whole bunch can be calculated ac cordingly as we will show later. For example, if a bunch train is injected on axis ( yn= 0) into the main linac of a linear collider with structure rmsmisalignment σy, at the end of the linac one has: < y2 1>= 0 (40) < y2 2>=(/radicalBig (σ2y+<y2 1> 2)e2Ne|WT(sb)|)2(sb)ls 2γ(s)γ(0)Gk2n(s)(m0c2)2(41) < y2 3>=/parenleftbigg/radicalBig (σ2y+<y2 1> 2)e2Ne|WT(2sb)|+/radicalBig (σ2y+<y2 2> 2)e2Ne|WT(sb)|/parenrightbigg2 ls 2γ(s)γ(0)Gk2n(s)(m0c2)2(42) and in a general way, one has: < y2 i>=/parenleftBig/summationtexti−1 j=1/radicalBig (σ2y+1 2< y2 j>)e2Ne|WT((i−j)sb)|/parenrightBig2 ls 2γ(s)γ(0)Gk2n(s)(m0c2)2(43) Finally, one can use the following formula to estimate the pr ojected emittance of the bunch train: ǫtrain n,rms=γ(s)k(s) NbNb/summationdisplay i=1< y2 i> (44) where k(s) =kn(s) (since the bunch to bunch energy spread has been ignored), a ndk(s) is the average over the linac. It is high time now for us to point out that the analytical expr essions for the single and multibunch emittance growths established above give the st atistical results of infinite number of machines with Gaussian structure misalignment error distr ibution, which corresponds to using infinite seeds in numerical simulations. 6 Comparison with numerical simulation results To start with, we take the single bunch emittance growth in th e main linac of SBLC [9] for example. The short range wakefields in the accelerating S-ba nd structures are obtained by using the analytical formulae [7] and shown in Fig. 2. In the m ain linac the beam is injected at 3 GeV and accelerated to 250 GeV with an accelerating gradien t of 17 MV/m. The accelerating structure length ls=6 m, the average beta function β(s) is about 70 m ( k(s,z) =1 β(s)for smooth focusing), the bunch population Ne= 1.1×1010, the bunch length σz= 300 µm, and and corresponding dipole mode short range wakefield W⊥(zc) = 338 V/pC/m2. Inserting these parameters into eq. 19, one finds ǫn,rms = 8.66×σ2 z. If accelerating structure misalignment error σy= 100 µm, one gets a normalized emittance growth of 8.66 ×10−8mrad, i.e., 35% increase compared with the designed normalized emittance o f 2.5×10−7mrad. The analytical result agrees quite well with that obtained from numerical s imulations [9]. Now, we apply the analytical formulae established for the multibunch emitta nce growth to SBLC, TESLA and NLC linear collider projects where enormous numerical simulat ions have been done. The machine parameters are given in Tables 1 to 4 which have been used in th e analytical calculation in this paper. Firstly, we look at SBLC. 7(a) z (m)I (A) (b) z (m)I (A) (c) z (m)Wz (V/pC/m) (d) z (m)Wr (V/pC/m)00.050.10.150.20.250.30.35 -0.001 0 0.00100.050.10.150.20.250.30.35 -0.001 0 0.001 -140-120-100-80-60-40-200 -0.001 0 0.00102.557.51012.51517.52022.5 -0.001 0 0.001 Figure 2: The short range wakefields of SBLC type structure wi thσz= 300 µm, and the beam iris a= 0.0133 m. (a) and (b) are the bunch current distributions. (c) i s monopole the longitudinal wakefield. (d) is the dipole transverse wakefie ld atr=a. Fig. 3 shows the “kick factor” Kdefined in eqs. 38 and 39 vs the dipole mode frequency. Figure 3: The Kivs dipole mode frequency (SBLC). Fig. 4(a) gives the long range transverse wakefield produced by the first bunch at the locations where find the succeeding bunches, while Fig. 4(b) illustrat es the square of the rmsdeviation of each bunch at the end of the linac with the dipole loaded qua lity factor Q1= 2000. The corresponding results for Q1= 10000 are shown in Fig. 5. The normalized emittance growths compared with the design value at the interaction point ( ǫdesign,IP n,rms = 2.5×10−7mrad) are 32% and 388% corresponding to the two cases, respectively as sho wn in Table 4, which agree well with the numerical results [9]. 8Figure 4: (a) the long range dipole mode wakefield vs the numbe r of bunch. (b) the y2 iat the end of linac vs the number of bunch (SBLC, Q1= 2000, σy= 100 µm). Figure 5: (a) the long range dipole mode wakefield vs the numbe r of bunch. (b) the y2 iat the end of linac vs the number of bunch (SBLC, Q1= 10000, σy= 100 µm). 9To demonstrate the necessity of detuning cavities we show th e violent bunch train blow up if constant impedance structures are used in spite of Q1being loaded to 2000 as shown in Fig. 6. Secondly, TESLA (the version appeared in ref. 10) is investi gated. From Fig. 7 one agrees that it is a no detuning case. Figure 6: (a) the long range dipole mode wakefield vs the numbe r of bunch. (b) the y2 iat the end of linac vs the number of bunch (SBLC no detuning, Q1= 2000, σy= 100 µm). Figure 7: The Kivs dipole mode frequency (TESLA). 10From the results shown in Fig. 8 and Table 4 one finds that takin g structure misalignment errorσy= 500 µm and Q1= 7000 one gets an normalized emittance growth of 24% which is a very reasonable result compared what has been found numeric ally in ref. 10. Thirdly, we look at NLC X-band main linac. To facilitate the exercise we assum e the detuning is effectuated as shown in Fig. 9 (in reality, NLC uses Gaussian detuning). Fig . 10 shows the analytical results withσy= 15 µm and Q1= 1000. From Table 4 one finds a normalized emittance growth of 21%. Then, we examine NLC S-band prelinac. Assuming that the detuning of the dipole mode is shown in Fig. 11, one gets the multibunch transverse behav iour and the normalized emittance growth in Fig. 12 and Table 4. Finally, in Figs. 13 and 14 we giv e more information about the emittance growth vs Q1in NLC X-band and S-band linacs. Figure 8: (a) the long range dipole mode wakefield vs the numbe r of bunch. (b) the y2 iat the end of linac vs the number of bunch (TESLA, Q1=7000, σy= 500 µm). Figure 9: The Kivs dipole mode frequency (NLC X-band linac). 11Figure 10: (a) the long range dipole mode wakefield vs the numb er of bunch. (b) the y2 iat the end of linac vs the number of bunch (NLC X-band linac, Q1=1000, σy= 15µm). Figure 11: The Kivs dipole mode frequency (NLC S-band prelinac). 12(a) Number of bunchWt (V/C/m**2 ) (b) Number of bunchyi**2 (m**2)-3000-2000-100001000200030004000x 1010 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00.050.10.150.20.25x 10-10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Figure 12: (a) the long range dipole mode wakefield vs the numb er of bunch. (b) the y2 iat the end of linac vs the number of bunch (NLC S-band prelinac, Q1=10000, σy= 50µm). 05 10-81 10-71.5 10-72 10-72.5 10-73 10-7 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 104NLC X-band linacNormalized emittance (m rad) Q1Design value Figure 13: The normalized emittance growth vs Q1withσy= 15µm (NLC X-band linac). 13Figure 14: The normalized emittance growth vs Q1withσy= 50µm (NLC S-band linac). Machine ls(m) Ncf1(GHz) a(m) D(m) h (m) R (m) SBLC 6 180 4.2-4.55 0.015-0.01 0.035 0.0292 0.041 TESLA 1 9 1.7 0.035 0.115 0.0974 0.095 NLC X-band 1.8 206 15-16 0.0059-0.00414 0.00875 0.0073 0.011 NLC S-band 4 114 4.2-4.55 0.015-0.01 0.035 0.0292 0.041 Table 1: The machine parameters I. Machine Ne(×1010)sb(m) Ez(MV/m) σz(µm)NbQ1 SBLC 1.1 1.8 17 300 333 2000,10000 TESLA 3.63 212 25 700 1136 7000 NLC X-band 1.1 0.84 50 145 95 1000 NLC S-band 1.1 0.84 17 500 95 10000 Table 2: The machine parameters II. 14Machine γ(0) (GeV/MeV) γ(GeV/MeV) k(s) (1/m) σy(µm) SBLC 3/0.511 250/0.511 1/90 100 TESLA 3/0.511 250/0.511 1/90 500 NLC X-band 10/0.511 250/0.511 1/50 15 NLC S-band 20/0.511 10/0.5111 1/20 50 Table 3: The machine parameters III. Machine ǫtrain,numeri. n,rms (mrad) ǫtrain,analy. n,rms (mrad) ǫIP,design n,rms (mrad) SBLC 2.3×10−8,8.8×10−78.×10−8,9.7×10−72.5×10−7 TESLA ∼2.5×10−85.9×10−82.5×10−7 NLC X-band - 3×10−81.4×10−7 NLC S-band - 1.2×10−81.4×10−7 Table 4: The normalized train emittance growth. 7 Conclusion We treat the single and multibunch emittance growths in the m ain linac of a linear collider in analogy to the Brownian motion of a molecule, and obtained the analytical expressions for the emittance growth due to accelerating structure misalig nment errors by solving Langevin equation. As proved in this paper, the same set of formulae ca n be derived also by solving directly Fokker-Planck equation. Analytical results have been compared with those coming from the numerical simulations, such as SBLC and TESLA, and t he agreement is quite well. As interesting applications, we give the analytical result s on the estimation of the multibunch emittance growth in NLC X-band and S-band linacs. 8 Acknowledgement It is a pleasure to discuss with J. Le Duff on the stochastic mot ions. I thank F. Richard for his reminding me the work of J. Perez Y Jorba on inverse multip le Touschek effect in linear colliders, and T.O. Raubenheimer for the discussion on the N LC parameters and detailed beam dynamics problems. References [1] J. Gao, ”Parameter choices in linear collider designs”, LAL/RT 95-08, and ”An S-band superconducting linear collider”, Proceedings of EPAC96, Barcelona, 1996, p. 498. [2] A. Chao, B. Richter, and C.Y. Yao, ”Beam emittance growth caused by transverse deflecting fields in a linear accelerator”, Nucl. Instr. and Methods ,178(1980), p. 1. [3] V.E. Balakin, A.V. Novokhatsky, and V.P. Simirnov, ”VLE PP: Transverse beam dynam- ics”, and ”Stochastic beam heating”, Proc. 12th Int. Conf. o n High Energy Accelerators, Batavia, Fermilab, USA (1983), p. 119, and p. 121. [4] T.O. Raubenheimer, ”The generation and acceleration of low emittance flat beams for future linear colliders”, SLAC-Report-387, 1991. 15[5] J. Perez Y Jorba, ”Increase of emittance in high energy e+e−colliders by inverse multiple Touschek effect in single bunches”, Nucl. Instr. and Methods ,A297 (1990), p. 31. [6] S. Chandrasekhar, ”Stochastic problems in physics and a stronomy”, Rev. of Modern Physics , Vol. 15, No. 1 (1943), p. 1. [7] J. Gao, ”Analytical formulae and the scaling laws for the loss factors and the wakefields in disk-loaded periodic structures”, Nucl. Instr. and Methods ,A381 (1996), p. 174. [8] J. Gao, “Multibunch emittance growth and its correction s in S-band linear collider”, Par- ticle Accelerators ,Vol. 49 (1995), p. 117. [9] R. Brinkmann, et al. (editors), ”Conceptual design of a 5 00 GeV e+e−linear collider with integrated X-ray laser facility”, DESY 1997-048, Vol. II, 1 997. [10] R. Brinkmann, et al. (editors), ”Conceptual design of a 500 GeV e+e−linear collider with integrated X-ray laser facility”, DESY 1997-048, Vol. I, 19 97. 16f1 (Hz)Ki (V/C/m**2 ) 0500100015002000250030003500400045005000x 1013 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 x 107f1 (Hz)Ki (V/C/m**2 ) 0200400600800100012001400x 1012 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 4800 4900 x 106f1 (Hz)Ki (V/C/m**2 ) 05001000150020002500300035004000x 1010 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 x 106(a) Number of bunchWt (V/C/m**2 ) (b) Number of bunchyi**2 (m**2)05001000150020002500x 1012 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00.050.10.150.20.250.3x 10-11 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90(a) Number of bunchWt (V/C/m**2 ) (b) Number of bunchyi**2 (m**2)-6000-4000-200002000400060008000x 1010 50 100 150 200 250 300 00.020.040.060.080.10.120.140.16x 10-10 50 100 150 200 250 300(a) Number of bunchWt (V/C/m**2 ) (b) Number of bunchyi**2 (m**2)-10000100020003000x 1010 200 400 600 800 1000 00.020.040.060.080.1x 10-10 200 400 600 800 100002 10-84 10-86 10-88 10-81 10-71.2 10-71.4 10-7 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 104NLC S-band prelinacNormalized emittance (m rad) Q1Design valuef (Hz)Ki (V/C/m**2 ) 0200400600800100012001400x 1012 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 4800 4900 x 106(a) Number of bunchWt (V/C/m**2) (b) Number of bunchyi**2 (m**2)-2000-1500-1000-5000500100015002000x 1011 50 100 150 200 250 300 00.050.10.150.20.250.3x 10-9 50 100 150 200 250 300(a) Number of bunchWt (V/C/m**2 ) (b) Number of bunchyi**2 (m**2)-1000-500050010001500x 1012 50 100 150 200 250 300 05001000150020002500x 105 50 100 150 200 250 300

arXiv:physics/0005023v1 [physics.acc-ph] 9 May 2000LAL/RT 00-02 February 2000 ANALYTICAL ESTIMATION OF THE DYNAMIC APERTURES OF CIRCULAR ACCELERATORS Jie Gao Laboratoire de l’Acc´ el´ erateur Lin´ eaire IN2P3-CNRS et Universit´ e de Paris-Sud, BP 34, F-91898 Orsa y Cedex Abstract By considering delta function sextupole, octupole, and dec apole perturbations and using difference action-angle variable equations, we find some use ful analytical formulae for the estimation of the dynamic apertures of circular accelerato rs due to single sextupole, single octupole, single decapole (single 2 mpole in general). Their combined effects are derived based on the Chirikov criterion of the onset of stochastic mo tions. Comparisons with nu- merical simulations are made, and the agreement is quite sat isfactory. These formulae have been applied to determine the beam-beam limited dynamic ape rture in a circular collider. 1 Introduction One of the preoccupations of the circular accelerator desig ner is to estimate the influence of nonlinear forces on the single particle’s motion. These non linear forces manifest themselves as the systematic and random errors from optical elements, the voluntarily introduced functional ones, such as the sextupoles used for the chromaticity corre ctions and the octupoles used for stabilizing the particles’ collective motion, or from nonl inear beam-beam interaction forces. Even though the nonlinear forces mentioned above compared w ith the linear forces are usually very small, what is observed in reality, however, is that whe n the amplitudes of the transverse oscillation of a particle are large enough, the transverse m otion might become unstable and the particle itself will finally be lost on the vacuum chamber . Apparently, the above implied maximum oscillation amplitudes, Ax,y, corresponding to the stable motions are functions of the specific longitudinal position, s, along the machine, and these functions Ax,y(s) are the so-called dynamic apertures of the machine. A reasonably designed mac hine should satisfy the condition Ax,y(s)≥Mx,y(s), where Mx,y(s) are the mechanical cross-section dimensions of the vacuum chamber. Needless to say the dynamic aperture problem in circular acc elerators is one of the most challenging research topics for accelerator physicists, a nd the relevant methods adopted to treat this problem are quite different analytically and numerical ly. In this paper we will show how single sextupole, single octupole, and single decapole (si ngle 2 mpole in general) in the machine 1limit the dynamic aperture and what is their combined effect i f there are more than one non- linear element. From the established analytical formulae f or the dynamic aperture one gets the scaling laws which relate the nonlinear perturbation stren gths, beta functions, and the dynamic apertures. To test the validity of these formulae, comparis ons with some numerical simulation have been made. As an interesting application the beam-beam limited dynamic apertures in a circular collider have been discussed. 2 Hamiltonian Formalism The Hamiltonian formulation of dynamics is best known not on ly for its deep physical and philosophical inspiration to the physicists, but also for i ts technical convenience in solving various nonlinear dynamical problems. The general Hamiltonian for a particle of rest mass, m0, and charge, e, in a magnetic vector potential, A, and electric potential, Φ, is expressed as: H(q,p,t) =eΦ +c/parenleftBig (p−eA)2+m0c2/parenrightBig1/2(1) where cis the velocity of light and pis the momentum with its components, pi, conjugate to the space coordinates, qi. The equations of motion can be readily written in terms of Ha milton’s equations: dpi dt=−∂H ∂qi(2) dqi dt=∂H ∂pi(3) For our specific dynamic problems in a circular accelerator i t is convenient to chose curvilinear coordinates instead of Cartesian ones for us to describe the trajectory of a particle near an a priori known closed orbit. The Hamiltonian in the new system, ( x,s,y) (where x,s, and y denote the coordinates in the Frenet-Serret normal, tangen t, and binormal triorthogonal and right-handed coordinate system), is given by [1]−[7]: Ht(q,p,t) =eΦ +c/parenleftBigg (px−eAx)2+ (py−eAy)2+/parenleftbiggps−eAs 1 +x/ρ/parenrightbigg2 +m0c2/parenrightBigg1/2 (4) where ρis the radius of curvature and the torsion of the closed orbit is everywhere zero. Since it is useful to use the variable, s, as the independent variable rather than time, t, one gets the new Hamiltonian by using a simple canonical transformation : Hs=−eAs−(1 +x/ρ)/parenleftbigg1 c2(E2−m2 0c4)−(px−eAx)2−(py−eAy)2/parenrightbigg1/2 −eΦ (5) Noting that the term1 c2(E2−m2 0c4) in eq. 5 is equal to P2withPbeing the total mechanical momentum of the particle, by using another trivial canonica l transformation: ¯q=q,¯s=s,¯px,y=px,y P0,H=Hs P0(6) one gets another Hamiltonian: H=−eAs P0−(1 +x/ρ)/parenleftbiggP P0−(¯px−eAx P0)2−(¯py−eAy P0)2/parenrightbigg1/2 −eΦ P0(7) 2where P0is the mechanical momentum of the reference particle, and P=P0+ ∆P. Inserting eAs/P0in eq. 7 by: eAs P0=−Byx2 2ρ2B0−1 B0ρ∞/summationdisplay n=11 n!∂n−1By ∂xn−1|x=0,y=0(x+iy)n(8) one gets finally the Hamiltonian which serves as the starting point of most of the dynamical problems concerning circular accelerators: H=x2By|x=0,y=0 2ρ2B0+1 B0ρ∞/summationdisplay n=11 n!∂n−1By ∂xn−1|x=0,y=0(x+iy)n −(1 +x/ρ)/parenleftBigg 1 +∆P P0−/parenleftbigg ¯px−eAx P0/parenrightbigg2 −/parenleftbigg ¯py−eAy P0/parenrightbigg2/parenrightBigg1/2 −eΦ P0(9) where B0is the bending magnetic field on the orbit of the reference par ticle, and Byin general is a complex variable. 3 Analytical formulae for dynamic apertures To start with we consider the linear horizontal motion of the reference particle (no energy deviation) in the horizontal plane (y=0) assuming that the m agnetic field is only transverse (Ax=Ay= 0) and has no skew fields, and Φ is a constant. The Hamiltonian can be simplified as H=p2 2+K(s) 2x2(10) where xdenotes normal plane coordinate, p=dx/ds , and K(s) is a periodic function satisfying the relation K(s) =K(s+L) (11) where Lis the circumference of the ring. The solution of the deviati on,x, is found to be x=/radicalBig ǫxβx(s) cos(φ(s) +φ0) (12) where φ(s) =/integraldisplays 0ds βx(s)(13) As an essential step towards further discussion on the motio ns under nonlinear perturbation forces, we introduce action-angle variables and the Hamilt onian expressed in these new variables: Ψ =/integraldisplays 0ds′ βx(s′)+φ0 (14) J=ǫx 2=1 2βx(s)/parenleftBigg x2+/parenleftbigg βx(s)x′−β′ xx 2/parenrightbigg2/parenrightBigg (15) H(J,Ψ) =J βx(s)(16) Since H(J,Ψ) = J/βx(s) is still a function of the independent variable, s, we will make another canonical transformation to freeze the new Hamiltonian: Ψ1= Ψ +2πν L−/integraldisplays 0ds′ βx(s′)(17) 3J1=J (18) H1=2πν LJ1 (19) Before going on further, let’s remember the relation betwee n the last action-angle variables and the particle deviation x: x=/radicalBig 2J1βx(s) cos/parenleftbigg Ψ1−2πν Ls+/integraldisplays 0ds′ βx(s′)/parenrightbigg (20) Being well prepared, we start our journey to find out the limit ations of the nonlinear forces on the stability of the particle’s motion. To facilitate the an alytical treatment of this complicated problem we consider at this stage only sextupoles and octupo les (no skew terms) and assume that the contributions from the sextupoles and octupoles in a ring can be made equivalent to a point sextupole and a point octupole. The perturbed one dime nsional Hamiltonian can thus be expressed: H=p2 2+K(s) 2x2+1 3!Bρ∂2Bz ∂x2x3L∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) +1 4!Bρ∂3Bz ∂x3x4L∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) (21) Representing eq. 21 by action-angle variables ( J1and Ψ 1), and using Bz=B0(1 +xb1+x2b2+x3b3) (22) one has H=2πν LJ1+(2J1βx(s1))3/2 3ρb2Lcos3Ψ1∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) +(J1βx(s2))2 ρb3Lcos4Ψ1∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) (23) where s1ands2are just used to differentiate the locations of the sextupole and the octupole perturbations. By virtue of Hamiltonian one gets the differe ntial equations for Ψ 1andJ1 dJ1 ds=−∂H1 ∂Ψ1(24) dΨ1 ds=∂H1 ∂J1(25) dJ1 ds=−(2J1βx(s1))3/2 3ρb2Ldcos3Ψ1 dΨ1∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) −(J1βx(s2))2 ρb3Ldcos4Ψ1 dΨ1∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) (26) dΨ1 ds=2πν L+√ 2J1/2 1βx(s1)3/2 ρb2Lcos3Ψ1∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) +2β2 x(s2) ρJ1b3Lcos4Ψ1∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) (27) We now change these differential equations to the difference e quations which are suitable to analyse the possibilities of the onset of stochasticity [8] [9]. Since the perturbations have a natural periodicity of Lwe will sample the dynamic quantities at a sequence of siwith constant 4interval Lassuming that the characteristic time between two consecut ive adiabatic invariance breakdown intervals is shorter than L/c. The differential equations in eqs. 26 and 27 are reduced to J1=J1(Ψ1,J1) (28) Ψ1=Ψ1(Ψ1,J1) (29) where the bar stands for the next sampled value after the corr esponding unbarred previous value. J1=J1−(2J1βx(s1))3/2 3ρb2Ldcos3Ψ1 dΨ1−(J1βx(s2))2 ρb3Ldcos4Ψ1 dΨ1(30) Ψ1= Ψ1+ 2πν+√ 2βx(s1)3/2J11/2 ρb2Lcos3Ψ1+2βx(s2)2 ρJ1b3Lcos4Ψ1 (31) Eqs. 30 and 31 are the basic difference equations to study the n onlinear resonance and the onset of stochasticities considering sextupole and octupole per turbations. By using trigonometric relation cosmθcosnθ= 2−mm/summationdisplay r=0m! (m−r)!r!cos(n−m+ 2r)θ (32) one has cos3θ=2 23(cos 3θ+ 3cos θ) (33) cos4θ=1 24(2cos 4 θ+ 8cos 2 θ+4! ((4/2)!)2) (34) If the tune νis far from the resonance lines ν=m/n, where mandnare integers, the invariant tori of the unperturbed motion are preserved under the prese nce of the small perturbations by virtue of the Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser (KAM) theorem. If, h owever, νis close to the above mentioned resonance line, under some conditions the KAM inv ariant tori can be broken. Consider first the case where there is only one sextupole loca ted at s=s1withβx(s1). Taking the third order resonance, m/3, for example, we keep only the sinusoidal function with phase 3Ψ 1in eq. 30 and the dominant phase independent nonlinear term i n eq. 31, and as the result, eqs. 30 and 31 become J1=J1+Asin 3Ψ 1 (35) Ψ1= Ψ1+BJ1 (36) with A=(2J1βx(s1))3/2 4/parenleftbiggb2L ρ/parenrightbigg (37) B=√ 2βx(s1)3/2J−1/2 1/parenleftbiggb2L ρ/parenrightbigg (38) where we have dropped the constant phase in eq. 31 and take the maximum value of cos3(Ψ1), 1. It is helpful to transform eqs. 37 and 38 into the form so-call edstandard mapping [9] expressed as I=I+K0sinθ (39) θ=θ+I (40) withθ= 3Ψ, I= 3BJ1andK0= 3AB. By virtue of the Chirikov criterion [9] it is known that when |K0| ≥0.97164 [10] resonance overlapping occurs which results in pa rticles’ stochastic motions and diffusion processes. Therefore, |K0| ≤1 (41) 5can be taken as a natural criterion for the determination of t he dynamic aperture of the machine. Putting eqs. 37 and 38 into eq. 41, one gets |K0|= 3J1βx(s1)3/parenleftbigg|b2|L ρ/parenrightbigg2 ≤1 (42) and consequently, one finds maximum J1corresponding to a m/3 resonance J1≤Jmax,sext =1 3βx(s1)3/parenleftbiggρ |b2|L/parenrightbigg2 (43) The dynamic aperture of the machine is therefore Adyna,sext =/radicalBig 2Jmax,sext βx(s) =/radicalbig 2βx(s)√ 3βx(s1)3/2/parenleftbiggρ |b2|L/parenrightbigg (44) Eq. 44 gives the dynamic aperture of a sextuple strength dete rmined case. The reader can confirm that if we keep sin(Ψ 1) term instead of sin(3Ψ 1) in eq. 35, one arrives at the same expression for Adyna,sext as expressed in eq. 44. Secondly, we consider the case of single octupole located at s=s2withβx(s2). Taking the forth order resonance, m/4, for example, we keep only the sinusoidal function with pha se 4Ψ 1 in eq. 30 and the dominant phase independent nonlinear term i n eq. 31, and as the result, we have eqs. 30 and 31 reduced to J1=J1+Asin 4Ψ 1 (45) Ψ1= Ψ1+BJ1 (46) with A=(J1βx(s2))2 2/parenleftbiggb3L ρ/parenrightbigg (47) B= 2βx(s2)2/parenleftbiggb3L ρ/parenrightbigg (48) where we have dropped the constant phase in eq. 31 and take the maximum value of cos4(Ψ1), 1. By using Chirikov criterion, one gets J1≤Jmax,oct =1 2βx(s2)2/parenleftbiggρ |b3|L/parenrightbigg (49) and the corresponding dynamic aperture: Adyna,oct =/radicalBig 2Jmax,oct βx(s) =/radicalbig βx(s) βx(s2)/radicalBigg ρ |b3|L(50) Thirdly, without repeating, we give directly the dynamic ap erture due to a decapole located at s=s3: Adyna,deca =/radicalBig 2βx(s)/parenleftbigg1 5β5x(s3)/parenrightbigg1/6/parenleftbiggρ |b4|L/parenrightbigg1/3 (51) where b4is the coefficient of the decapole strength. Finally, we give t he general expression of the dynamic aperture in the horizontal plane ( z= 0) of a single 2 m(m≥3) pole component: Adyna,2m=/radicalBig 2βx(s)/parenleftbigg1 mβmx(s(2m))/parenrightbigg 1 2(m−2)/parenleftbiggρ |bm−1|L/parenrightbigg1/(m−2) (52) where s(2m) is the location of this multipole. Eq. 52 gives us useful sca ling laws, such as Adyna,2m∝/parenleftBigρ |bm−1|L/parenrightBig1/(m−2), and Adyna,2m∝/parenleftBig 1 βmx(s(2m))/parenrightBig1 2(m−2). If there is more than one nonlinear component, how can one est imate their collective effect ? Fortunately, one can distinguish two cases: 61) If the components are independent , i.e. there are no special phase and amplitude relations between them, the total dynamic aperture can be calculated a s: Adyna,total =1/radicalbigg/summationtext i1 A2 dyna,sext,i+/summationtext j1 A2 dyna,oct,j+/summationtext k1 A2 dyna,deca,k+· · ·(53) 2) If the nonlinear components are dependent , i.e. there are special phase and amplitude relations between them (for example, in reality, one use som e additional sextupoles to cancel the nonlinear effects of the sextupoles used to make ch romaticity corrections), there is no general formula as eq. 53 to apply. In the above discussion we have restricted us to the case wher e particles are moving in the horizontal plane, and the one dimensional dynamic aperture formulae expressed in eqs. 44, 50, 51 and 53, are the maximum stable horizontal excursion range s with the vertical displacement y= 0. In the following we will show briefly how to estimate the dy namic aperture in 2 dimensions when there is coupling between the horizontal and vertical p lanes. Now we consider the case where only one sextupole is located at s=s1, and we have the corresponding Hamiltonian expressed as follows: H=p2 x 2+Kx(s) 2x2+p2 y 2+Ky(s) 2y2+1 3!Bρ∂2Bz ∂x2(x3−3xy2)L∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) (54) Generally speaking, there exists no universal criterion to determine the start up of stochastic motions in 2D. Fortunately, in our specific case, we find out th e similarity between the Hamil- tonian expressed in eq. 54 and that of the H´ enon and Heiles pr oblem which has been much studied in literature [11]. The H´ enon and Heiles problem’s Hamiltonian is given by HH&H=1 2/parenleftbigg x2+p2 x+y2+p2 y+ 2y2x−2 3x3/parenrightbigg (55) when HH&H>1/6 the motion becomes unstable. The intuition we get from this conclusion is that there should exist a similar criterion for our problem, i.e. to have stable 2D motion one should have H≤Hmax. Note that Kx(s) and Ky(s) in eq. 54 are equal to unity in the H´ enon and Heiles problem’s Hamiltonian. The previous one dimensi onal result helps us now to find Hmax. When y= 0 one has Hmax∝A2 dyna,sext,x , since x≤Adyna,sext,x . When y∝negationslash= 0, the crossing terms in eqs. 54 and 55 will play the role of exchangi ng energy between the two planes, and for a given set of xandythe total energy of the coupled system can not exceed Hmax. If we define Adyna,sext,y is the dynamic aperture in y-plane, one has: βx(s1)A2 dyna,sext,x =βy(s1)A2 dyna,sext,y +βx(s1)x2(56) or: Adyna,sext,y =/radicalBigg βx(s1) βy(s1)(A2 dyna,sext,x−x2) (57) where βy(s1) is the vertical beta function where the sextupole is locate d and Adyna,sext,x is given by eq. 44. Different from eq. 52, the derivation of eq. 57 is qui te intuitive, hinted by the H´ enon and Heiles problem which has been studied numerically inste ad of analytically in literature. From eq. 57 one understands that the difference between Adyna,sext,y andAdyna,sext,x comes from/radicalBig βx(s1)/βy(s1). If there are many sextupoles in a ring one usually has Adyna,sext,x ≈Adyna,sext,y sinceβx(si) will not be always larger or smaller than βy(si). 74 Comparison with simulation results To verify the validity of eqs. 44, 50, 53, and 57, we compare th e dynamic apertures of some special cases by using these analytical formulae with a comp uter code called BETA [12]. Taking the lattice of Super-ACO as an example, we show the schematic layout of the machine in Fig. 1. BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 17:01:44 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole saco-full - no sextuple and octupole Figure 1: The schematic layout of Super-ACO. The horizontal beta function distribution and the working p oint in the third order tune diagram are given in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. From Fig. 2 o ne finds that the horizontal beta function at the beginning and the end of the one turn mapp ing is 5.6 m. In the following numerical simulations the dynamic apertures correspond to βx(s) =βx(0) = 5 .6 m and it will also be used in the analytical formulae. Defining the sextupo le, octupole, and decapole strengths S=b2L/ρ(1/m2),O=b3L/ρ(1/m3),D=b4L/ρ(1/m4), respectively, we make now a rather systematic comparison. 1) A sextupole is located at s=s1withS(s1) = 1 and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m, and its influence on the horizontal dynamic aperture is illustrated in Figs. 4 and 5. From eq. 44 one gets analytically that Adyna,sext = 0.0385 m compared with the numerical value of 0.04 m. 2) An octupole is located at s=s1withO(s1) = 10 and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m, and its influence on the horizontal dynamic aperture is illustrated in Figs. 6 and 7. From eq. 50 one gets analytically that Adyna,oct = 0.055 m compared with the numerical value of 0.054 m. 3) The validity of eq. 51 has been checked also. If a decapole w ith strength D= 1000 is located at s=s1, the dynamic aperture in horizontal plane is shown in Figs. 8 and 9. From eq. 51 one gets Adyna,deca = 0.022 m compared with the numerical value of 0.024 m. 4) A sextupole of S= 2 and a octupole of O= 62 are located at s=s1andβx(s1) = 13 .6 m, and their combined influence on the horizontal dynamic ape rture is shown in Figs. 10 and 11. From eq. 53 one gets Adyna,total = 0.0145 m compared with the numerical value of 0.016 m. 8010203040506070024681012141618BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 17:03:13 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole OPTICAL FUNCTIONS NUX = 4.720 NUZ = 1.700Ex/PI= 4.254E-08 Figure 2: The horizontal beta function distribution of Supe r-ACO ( βx(0) = 5 .6 m). 4.4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.1.1.21.41.61.82.BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 17:21:09 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole TUNE DIAGRAM NUZ NUX Figure 3: The tune diagram of the third order of Super-ACO, wh ere the cross indicates the working point of the machine. 9-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.060.00.020.040.060.080.1BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:40:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole DYNAMIC APERTURE Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 1000 Gmax = 1.000E+05 Figure 4: The dynamic aperture plot ( S(s1) = 1 and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m). -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:43:21 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.060E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:43:39 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:43:48 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:43:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:44:02 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:44:10 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:44:25 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.030E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:44:38 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:44:45 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:44:56 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:45:05 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.900E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:45:14 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.950E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:45:28 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.800E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:45:42 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:45:48 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.600E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:45:56 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:46:03 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.400E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:46:10 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:46:18 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.200E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:46:24 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:46:36 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.900E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:46:42 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.800E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:46:47 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:46:54 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.600E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:47:07 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:47:17 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:47:24 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:47:31 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.800E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:47:38 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.600E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:47:48 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:47:54 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:48:02 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 8.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:48:09 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:48:16 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:48:22 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:48:46 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.070E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:48:58 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.020E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:49:06 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:49:26 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.980E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:49:40 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.070E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00 Figure 5: The horizontal phase space ( S(s1) = 1 and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m). 10-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.060.00.050.10.150.2BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 9-Nov-99 10:21:30 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole DYNAMIC APERTURE Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 Figure 6: The dynamic aperture plot ( O(s1) = 10 and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m). -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:59:04 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:59:16 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:59:27 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 14:59:38 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:00:06 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:00:16 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:00:29 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:00:39 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:00:49 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.200E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:00:56 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:01:06 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.900E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:01:13 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.800E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:01:18 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:01:27 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.600E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:01:33 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:01:40 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.400E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:01:51 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:01:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.200E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:01 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:09 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:16 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.900E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:22 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.800E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:28 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:36 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.600E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:44 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:52 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.400E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:02:58 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:03:08 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.200E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:03:13 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:03:25 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.900E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:03:32 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:03:38 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:03:51 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.600E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:04:00 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:04:17 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.650E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:04:44 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:04:52 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:05:04 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.800E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:05:10 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:05:15 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:05:22 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:05:29 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:05:38 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 9.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 15:06:02 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 8.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00 Figure 7: The horizontal phase space ( O(s1) = 10 and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m). 11-.08 -.04 0.0 0.04 0.080.00.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.08BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 15:37:27 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole DYNAMIC APERTURE Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 Figure 8: The dynamic aperture plot ( D(s1) = 1000 and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m). -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:14:23 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:14:39 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:14:45 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:14:50 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.400E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:14:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:14:59 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:06 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:09 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:17 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.150E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:28 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.950E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:36 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.850E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:40 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.750E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:46 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.650E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.550E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:15:59 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.450E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:04 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.350E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:09 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.250E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:13 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.150E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:18 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.050E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:28 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 9.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:34 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 8.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:39 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 7.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:43 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 6.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:47 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:51 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:16:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:17:00 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 16:17:04 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00 Figure 9: The horizontal phase space ( D(s1) = 1000 and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m). 12-.03-.02-.010.00.010.020.030.00.020.040.060.080.1BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:39:06 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole DYNAMIC APERTURE Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 1000 Gmax = 1.000E+05 Figure 10: The dynamic aperture plot ( S(s1) = 2, O(s1) = 62, and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m). -.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:41:35 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:41:52 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:41:59 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.200E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:42:04 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:42:27 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.400E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:42:33 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:42:45 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.600E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:42:51 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:42:59 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:43:06 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:43:13 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:45:38 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.170E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:46:08 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:46:13 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 7.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:46:18 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 8.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:46:26 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 9.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:46:31 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:46:37 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:46:48 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.700E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:46:56 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.700E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:47:04 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.550E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:47:12 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.400E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.04 -.02 0.00.02 0.04-.04-.020.00.020.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 7-Oct-99 16:47:19 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-09 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.530E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00 Figure 11: The horizontal phase space ( S(s1) = 2, O(s1) = 62, and βx(s1) = 13 .6 m). 135) A sextupole of S= 2 and a octupole of O= 62 are located at s=s1,βx(s1) = 13 .6 m, ands=s2,βx(s2) = 15 .18 m, respectively, and their combined influence on the horiz ontal dynamic aperture is shown in Figs. 12 and 13. From eq. 53 one ge tsAdyna,total = 0.0138 m compared with the numerical value of 0.0135 m. 6) Four sextupoles of S= 2 are located at s=s1,2,3,4withβx(s1) = 13 .6 m,βx(s2) = 15 .18 m,βx(s3) = 7.8 m, and βx(s4) = 6.8 m, respectively, and their combined influence on the horizontal dynamic aperture is given in Figs. 14 and 15. From eq. 53 one obtained the analytical value Adyna,total = 0.012 m. 7) We show how the dynamic apertures depend on the strengths o f sextupole and octupole. Fig. 16 shows the comparison between the analytical (solid l ine) and the numerical (dotted) results for a sextupole located at s=s1in the machine shown in Fig. 2. Obviously, Adyna,sext scales with 1 /S. Fig. 17 gives the similar comparison for an octupole locate d ats=s2, and confirms that Adyna,oct scales with 1 /√ S. 8) Now we change the tune of the machine a little bit (from νx= 1.7 toνx= 1.565), and the corresponding horizontal beta function distribution and t he third order tune diagram are shown in Figs. 18 and 19. It is known that in this case βx(0) = 5 .1 m. A sextupole of S= 2 is located a s=s1withβx(s1) = 12 .42 m, and its influence on the dynamic aperture is shown in Figs. 20 and 21. From eq. 44 one finds Adyna,sext = 0.021 m compared with the numerical value of 0.02 m. 9) Finally, a 2D dynamic aperture is calculated numerically and analytically. If a sextupole ofS= 2 is located at s2in the same lattice as in case (1) with βx= 15.18 m and βy= 4.26 m, the 2D dynamic aperture is calculated by using BETA and eq. 57 as shown in Fig. 22 and Fig. 23, respectively. The peak analytical dynamic ap ertures in horizontal and vertical planes are 0.0163 m and 0.031 m, compared with the nu merical results of 0.017 m and 0.034 m, respectively. 14-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.060.00.0050.010.0150.020.0250.030.0350.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:31:12 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole DYNAMIC APERTURE Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 1000 Gmax = 1.000E+05 Figure 12: The dynamic aperture plot ( S(s1) = 2, O(s2) = 62, βx(s1) = 13 .6 m, and βx(s2) = 15.18 m ). -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:32:57 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:33:03 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:33:21 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 9.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:33:26 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 8.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:33:32 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 7.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:33:42 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 4.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:33:48 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:33:59 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 9.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:34:18 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:34:25 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:34:31 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:34:41 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:34:49 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.150E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:34:56 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:35:01 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:35:09 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:35:23 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 10:35:36 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole Figure 13: The horizontal phase space ( S(s1) = 2, O(s2) = 62, βx(s1) = 13 .6 m, and βx(s2) = 15.18 m). 15-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.060.00.0050.010.0150.020.0250.030.0350.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:59:28 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole DYNAMIC APERTURE Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 1000 Gmax = 1.000E+05 Figure 14: The dynamic aperture plot ( S(s1,2,3,4) = 2, βx(s1) = 13 .6 m, βx(s2) = 15 .18 m, βx(s3) = 7.8 m, and βx(s4) = 6.8 m). -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:56:03 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.170E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:56:11 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.200E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:56:17 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:56:22 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:56:30 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.350E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:57:24 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.250E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:57:29 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:57:35 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:57:42 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 8.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:57:47 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 7.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:57:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 6.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:58:00 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:58:06 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 10-Oct-99 15:58:10 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00 Figure 15: The horizontal phase space ( S(s1,2,3,4) = 2, βx(s1) = 13 .6 m, βx(s2) = 15 .18 m, βx(s3) = 7.8 m, and βx(s4) = 6.8 m). 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 S (1/m**2)00.050.10.15Adyna,sext (m)Super−ACO single sextupole case −I Figure 16: The dynamic aperture of Super-ACO vs S ( S=b2L/ρ) ats1. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 O (1/m**3)00.10.2Adyna,oct (m)Super−ACO Single octupole case−II Figure 17: The dynamic aperture of Super-ACO vs O ( O=b3L/ρ) ats2. 1701020304050607005101520BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:07:44 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole OPTICAL FUNCTIONS NUX = 4.786 NUZ = 1.565Ex/PI= 4.214E-08 Figure 18: The horizontal beta function distribution of mod ified Super-ACO ( βx(0) = 5 .1 m). 4.4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.1.1.21.41.61.82.BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:16:41 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole TUNE DIAGRAM NUZ NUX Figure 19: The tune diagram of the third order of modified Supe r-ACO, where the cross indicates the working point of the machine. 18-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.060.00.0050.010.0150.020.0250.030.0350.04BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:22:11 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole DYNAMIC APERTURE Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 1000 Gmax = 1.000E+05 Figure 20: The dynamic aperture plot ( S(s1) = 2 and βx(s1) = 12 .42 m). -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:11:38 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:11:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:12:13 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.400E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:12:23 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.300E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:12:28 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.200E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:12:34 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.100E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:12:44 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:12:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.400E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:13:05 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.500E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:13:11 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.200E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:13:17 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.150E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:13:30 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:13:37 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:13:42 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:14:02 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole -.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:14:16 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:14:28 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:14:33 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 2.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:14:38 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 3.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:14:43 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 5.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:14:47 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 7.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:14:55 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 8.000E-03 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:15:21 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.250E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:15:29 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.350E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:15:36 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.450E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.06BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Oct-99 14:15:45 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole X,XP TRACKING Ex/PI= 1.767E-04 Ez/PI= 1.049E-04 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 X0,XP0= 1.550E-02 .000E+00 Z0,ZP0= .000E+00 .000E+00 Figure 21: The horizontal phase space ( S(s1) = 2 and βx(s1) = 12 .42 m). 19-.06-.04-.020.00.020.040.060.00.010.020.030.040.050.060.07BETA-LNS V4.70 /18/09/96/ 8-Nov-99 14:27:32 1st .00E+00 saco-full - no sextuple and octupole DYNAMIC APERTURE Ex/PI= 1.607E-04 Ez/PI= 8.361E-05 Ntour= 100 Gmax = 1.000E+05 Figure 22: The 2D dynamic aperture of Super-ACO with S=2 loca ted at s2withβx(s2) = 15 .18 m and βy(s2) = 4.26 m. −0.07 −0.05 −0.03 −0.01 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07 x (m)00.010.020.030.040.050.060.07y (m)Super−ACO Single sextupole located at s2 Figure 23: The analytical estimation of the 2D dynamic apert ure of Super-ACO with S=2 located at s2withβx(s2) = 15 .18 m and βy(s2) = 4.26 m. 20To make the comparison much more clear we illustrate the mach ine parameters in Table 1 and the comparison results in Table 2. The agreement between the analytical and the numerical simu lation results is quite good. The fact that the analytically estimated 2D dynamic apertur e agrees well with that calculated by the numerical method shows that the method we have used to t reat the two coupled nonlinear oscillators is a reasonable heuristic procedure. Case Multipole strength beta function (m) 1 S(s1) = 2 (1/m2) βx(s1) = 13 .6 2 O(s1) = 10 (1/m3) βx(s1) = 13 .6 3 D(s1) = 1000 (1/m4) βx(s1) = 13 .6 4 S(s1) = 2 (1/m2),O(s1) = 62 (1/m3)βx(s1) = 13 .6 5 S(s1) = 2 (1/m2),O(s2) = 62 (1/m3)βx(s1) = 13 .6 ,β(s2) = 15 .18 6 S(s1,2,3,4) = 2 (1/m2) βx(s1,2,3,4) =13.6, 15.18, 7.8, 6.8 8 S(s1) = 2 (1/m2) βx(s1) = 12 .42 ,βx(0) = 5 .1 9 S(s1) = 2 (1/m2) βx(s2) = 15 .18 Table 1: summary of parameters Case Adyna,analy. (m) Adyna,numer. (m) 1 0.0385 0.04 2 0.055 0.054 3 0.022 0.024 4 0.0145 0.016 5 0.0138 0.0135 6 0.012 0.0135 8 0.021 0.02 9 Ax= 0.0163 , Ay= 0.031 Ax= 0.017,Ay= 0.034 Table 2: summary of comparison results 5 Beam-beam interaction limited dynamic apertures Since we are interested in the single particle motion under b eam-beam forces, the incoherent force should be taken into account [13]: Fr,in(r) =±nq2(1 +β2) 2πǫ0r/parenleftBigg 1−exp/parenleftBigg −r2 2σ2/parenrightBigg/parenrightBigg (58) where nis the line particle number density, βis the particle’s velocity in units of the speed of light, qis the particle’s electric charge, ǫ0is the permitivity in vacuum, ris the transverse offset of a particle with respect to the center of the counter-rotat ing colliding bunch, σis the standard deviation of the Gaussian transverse charge density distri bution, the positive and the negative signs correspond to the colliding bunches with the same or op posite charges, respectively. Now 21we expand Fr,in(r) into Taylor series: Fr,in(r) =±nq2 πǫ0/parenleftbigg1 2σ2r−1 8σ4r3+1 48σ6r5−1 384σ8r7+· · ·/parenrightbigg (59) where we take β= 1. To start with, we consider the particle’s motion in horiz ontal plane (y= 0) and consider only the delta function nonlinear beam-bea m forces coming from one IP. The differential equation of motion can be expressed as: d2x ds2+Kx(s)x=±nq2 πǫ0m0c2γ(1 2σ2x−1 8σ4x3+1 48σ6x5 −1 384σ8x7+· · ·)L∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) (60) where Kx(s) describes the linear focusing of the lattice in the horizon tal plane, m0c2is the rest energy of the particle, γis the normalized particle’s energy, and Lis the circumference of the circular collider. The corresponding Hamiltonian is expre ssed as: H=p2 x 2+Kx(s) 2x2∓nq2 πǫ0m0c2γ(1 4σ2x2−1 32σ4x4+1 288σ6x6 −1 3072σ8x8+· · ·)L∞/summationdisplay k=−∞δ(s−kL) (61) where px=dx/ds . To make use of the general dynamic aperture formulae shown in section 3, one needs only to find the equivalence relations by comparing two Hamiltoni ans expressed in eqs. 21 and 61, respectively, and it is found that: b3 ρL=Neq2 8πǫ0m0c2γσ4(62) b5 ρL=Neq2 48πǫ0m0c2γσ6(63) b7 ρL=Neq2 384πǫ0m0c2γσ8(64) and so on, where we have replaced nLbyNewhich is the particle population inside a bunch. Till now one can calculate all kinds of dynamic apertures due to nonlinear beam-beam forces. For example, one can get the dynamic apertures due to the beam -beam octupole nonlinear force: Adyna,8,x=/radicalbig βx(s) βx(s∗)/radicalBigg ρ |b3|L =/radicalbig βx(s) βx(s∗)/parenleftBigg 8πǫ0m0c2γσ4 Neq2/parenrightBigg1/2 (65) and Adyna,8,y=/radicalBigg βx(s∗) βy(s∗)(A2 dyna,8,x−x2) (66) where s∗is the IP position. If we measure dynamic apertures by the bea m sizes, one gets: Rx,8=Adyna,8,x σx(s)=/parenleftBigg 8πǫ0m0c2γǫx Neq2/parenrightBigg1/2 (67) 22where ǫxis the bunch horizontal emittance. When the higher order mul tipoles effects (2 m >8) can be neglected eqs. 65 and 66 give very good approximations to the 2D dynamic apertures limited by one beam-beam IP. If there are NIPinteraction points in a ring the dynamic apertures described in eqs. 65 and 66 will be reduced by a factor of√NIP(if these NIPinteraction points can be regarded as independent). Given the dynamic aperture of the ring without the beam- beam effect as Ax,y, the total dynamic aperture including the beam-beam effect c an be estimated usually as: Atotal,x,y =1/radicalbigg 1 A2x,y+1 A2 bb,x,y(68) Taking PEP-II B-Factory design parameters for example [14] and assuming that the beams are round at IP, for the high energy ring, Ne= 2.8×1010,γ= 1.76×104, and ǫx= 49 nm, one gets from eq. 67, Rx,8= 3.2, and for the low energy ring, Ne= 6×1010,γ= 6.07×103, and ǫx= 49 nm, one finds Rx,8= 2.7. 6 Conclusion We have derived the analytical formulae for the dynamic aper tures in circular accelerators due to single sextupole, single octupole, single decapole (singl e 2mpole in general), and the combination of many independent multipoles. The analytical results hav e been systematically compared with the numerical ones and the agreement is quite satisfactory. These formulae are very useful both for the physical insight and in the practical machine design and operation. One application of these formulae is to estimate analytically the beam-beam interaction determined dynamic aperture in a circular collider. 7 Acknowledgements The author of this paper thanks B. Mouton for his help in using BETA program and also for his generating a flexible lattice based on the original Super -ACO one. The fruitful discussions with A. Tkachenko are very much appreciated. References [1] R. Ruth, “Single particle dynamics in circular accelera tors”, AIP conference proceedings, No. 153, p. 150. [2] B.W. Montague, “Basic Hamiltonian mechanics”, CERN 95- 06, Vol. I, p. 1. [3] E.J.N. Wilson, “Nonlinear resonances”, CERN 95-06, Vol . I, p. 15. [4] J.S. Bell, “Hamiltonian mechanics”, CERN 87-03, p. 5. [5] A.A. Kolomesky and A.N. Lebedev, “Theory of cyclic accel erators”, North-Holland Pub- lishing Comp. (1966). [6] T. Suzuki, “Hamiltonian formulation for synchrotron os cillations and Sacherer’s integral equation”, Particle Accelerators , Vol. 12 (1982), p. 237. [7] H. Wiedemann, “Particle Accelerator Physics II”, Sprin ger-Verlag, 1993. [8] R.Z. Sagdeev, D.A. Usikov, and G.M. Zaslavsky, “Nonline ar Physics, from the pendulum to turbulence and chaos”, Harwood Academic Publishers, 198 8. 23[9] B.V. Chirikov, “A universal instability of many-dimens ional oscillator systems”, Physics Reports, Vol. 52, No. 5 (1979), p. 263. [10] J.M. Greene, J. Math. Phys. 20 (1979), p. 1183. [11] A.J. Lichtenberg and M.A. Lieberman, “Regular and stoc hastic motion”, Springer-Verlag (1983), p. 46. [12] L. Farvaque, J.L. Laclare, and A. Ropert, “BETA users’ g uide”, ESRF-SR/LAL-88-08. [13] E. Keil, “Beam-beam dynamics”, CERN 95-06, p. 539. [14] J.T. Seeman, “Commissioning results of the KEKB and PEP -II B-Factories”, Proceedings of PAC’99 (1999), p. 1. 24

arXiv:physics/0005024v1 [physics.optics] 9 May 2000Polarization Dependence of Emissivity David J. Strozzi Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technol ogy, Cambridge, MA 02139 Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princet on, NJ 08544 (April 3, 2000) 1 Problem Deduce the emissive power of radiation of frequency νinto vacuum at angle θto the normal to the surface of a good conductor at temperature T, for polarization both parallel and perpendicular to the plane of emission. 2 Solution The solution is adapted from ref. [1] (see also [2]), and finds application in the calibration of the polarization dependence of detectors for cosmic microw ave background radiation [3, 4]. Recall Kirchhoff’s law of heat radiation (as clarified by Plan ck [5]) that Pν Aν=K(ν, T) =hν3/c2 ehν/kT−1, (1) where Pνis the emissive power per unit area per unit frequency interv al (emissivity) and Aν= 1− R= 1−/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleE0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 (2) is the absorption coefficient (0 ≤Aν≤1),cis the speed of light, his Plank’s constant and kis Boltzmann’s constant. Also recall the Fresnel equations of reflection that E0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ⊥=sin(θt−θi) sin(θt+θi),E0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle /bardbl=tan(θt−θi) tan(θt+θi), (3) where i,r, and tlabel the incident, reflected, and transmitted waves, respe ctively. The solution is based on the fact that eq. (1) holds separatel y for each polarization of the emitted radiation, and is also independent of the angle o f the radiation. This result is implicit in Planck’s derivation [5] of Kirchhoff’s law of rad iation, and is stated explicitly in [6]. That law describes the thermodynamic equilibrium of ra diation emitted and absorbed throughout a volume. The emissivity Pvand the absorption coefficient Aνcan depend on the polarization of the radiation and on the angle of the radi ation, but the definitions of polarization parallel and perpendicular to a plane of emiss ion, and of angle relative to the normal to a surface element, are local, while the energy cons ervation relation Pν=AνK(ν, T) is global. A “ray” of radiation whose polarization can be des cribed as parallel to the plane of emission is, in general, a mixture of parallel and perpendic ular polarization from the point of view of the absorption process. Similarly, the angles of e mission and absorption of a ray 1are different in general. Thus, the concepts of parallel and p erpendicular polarization and of the angle of the radiation are not well defined after integr ating over the entire volume. Thermodynamic equilibrium can exist only if a single spectr al intensity function K(ν, T) holds independent of polarization and of angle. All that remains is to evaluate the reflection coefficients R⊥andR/bardblfor the two polar- izations at a vacuum-metal interface. These are well known [ 1, 2, 7], but we derive them for completeness. To use the Fresnel equations (3), we need expressions for sin θtand cos θt. The boundary condition that the phase of the wave be continuous across the vacuum-metal interface leads, as is well known, to the general form of Snell’s law: kisinθi=ktsinθt, (4) where k= 2π/λis the wave number. Then, cosθt=/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt1−k2 i k2 tsin2θi. (5) To determine the relation between wave numbers kiandktin vacuum and in the con- ductor, we consider a plane wave of angular frequency ω= 2πνand complex wave vector k, E=E0ei(kt·r−ωt), (6) which propagates in a conducting medium with dielectric con stant ǫ, permeability µ, and conductivity σ. The wave equation for the electric field in such a medium is (i n Gaussian units) ∇2E−ǫµ c2∂2E ∂t2=4πµσ c2∂E ∂t, (7) where cis the speed of light. We find the dispersion relation for the w ave vector kton inserting eq. (6) in eq. (7): k2 t=ǫµω2 c2+i4πσµω c2. (8) For a good conductor, the second term of eq. (8) is much larger than the first, so we write kt≈√2πσµω c(1 +i) =1 +i d=2 d(1−i), (9) where d=c√2πσµω≪λ (10) is the frequency-dependent skin depth. Of course, on settin gǫ= 1 = µandσ= 0 we obtain expressions that hold in vacuum, where ki=ω/c. We see that for a good conductor |kt| ≫ki, so according to eq. (5) we may take cos θt≈1 to first order of accuracy in the small ratio d/λ. Then the first of the Fresnel equations becomes E0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ⊥=cosθisinθt/sinθi−1 cosθisinθt/sinθi+ 1=(ki/kt) cosθi−1 (ki/kt) cosθi+ 1≈(πd/λ)(1−i) cosθi−1 (πd/λ)(1−i) cosθi+ 1,(11) 2and the reflection coefficient is approximated by R⊥=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleE0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 ⊥≈1−4πd λcosθi= 1−2 cosθi/radicalbiggν σ. (12) For the other polarization, we see that E0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle /bardbl=E0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ⊥cos(θi+θt) cos(θi−θt)≈E0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ⊥cosθi−(πd/λ)(1−i) sin2θi cosθi+ (πd/λ)(1−i) sin2θi, (13) so that R/bardbl≈ R ⊥/parenleftBigg 1−4πd λsin2θi cosθi/parenrightBigg ≈1−4πd λcosθi= 1−2 cosθi/radicalbiggν σ. (14) An expression for R/bardblvalid to second order in d/λhas been given in ref. [7]. For θinear 90◦, R⊥≈1, but eq. (14) for R/bardblis not accurate. Writing θi=π/2−ϑiwithϑi≪1, eq. (13) becomes E0r E0i/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle /bardbl≈ϑi−(πd/λ)(1−i) ϑi+ (πd/λ)(1−i), (15) Forθi=π/2,R/bardbl= 1, and R/bardbl,min= (5−√ 2)/(5 +√ 2) = 0 .58 for ϑi= 2√ 2πd/λ. Finally, combining eqs. (1), (2), (12) and (14) we have Pν⊥≈4πdcosθ λ3hν ehν/kT−1, P ν/bardbl≈4πd λ3cosθhν ehν/kT−1, (16) andPν⊥ Pν/bardbl= cos2θ (17) for the emissivities at angle θsuch that cos θ≫d/λ. The conductivity σthat appears in eq. (16) can be taken as the dc conductivity so long as the wavelength exceeds 10 µm [1]. If in addition hν≪kT, then eq. (16) can be written Pν⊥≈4πd kT cosθ λ3, P ν/bardbl≈4πd kT λ3cosθ, (18) in terms of the skin depth d. We would like to thank Matt Hedman, Chris Herzog and Suzanne S taggs for conversations about this problem. 3 References [1] M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics , 7th ed., (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1999), sec. 14.2. [2] L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, The Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1960), sec. 67. 3[3] E.J. Wollack, A measurement of the degree scale cosmic background radiati on anisotropy at 27.5, 30.5, and 33.5 GHz , Ph.D. dissertation (Princeton University, 1994), Append ix C.1.1. [4] C. Herzog, Calibration of a Microwave Telescope , Princeton U. Generals Expt. (Oct. 26, 1999). [5] M. Planck, The Theory of Heat Radiation (Dover Publications, New York, 1991), chap. II, especially sec. 28. [6] F. Reif, Fundamentals of statistical and thermal physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965), sec. 9.14. [7] J.A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941), sec. 9.9. 4

arXiv:physics/0005025v1 [physics.ed-ph] 9 May 2000The Precessing Top Oscar Bolina∗ Department of Mathematics University of California, Davis Davis, CA 95616-8633 USA 1. Introduction When a symmetric top is set spinning with angular velocity ωcabout its own axis, it traces out a circle about a vertical direction with angular velocity ωz, as shown in Fig. 1. In most textbooks [1, 2, 3] the precessional angular velocity ωzis calculated under the assumption that it is much smaller than the spinangular velocity ωc. This makes for a simplification of the calculation by considering the total angular momentum as du e to the spin motion only, and thus directed along the symmetry axis. In this case, the angular momentum along the symmetry axis is L=Iωc, where Iis the moment of inertia about this same axis. The tip of this vector descri bes a circle of radius Lsinθaround the vertical direction. The torque of gravity is mglsinθ, where mis the mass of the top and lis the distance of its center of mass CtoO. In a time interval ∆ tthe torque changes the angular momentum by Lsinθωz∆tin a direction tangent to the circle. Equating torque to time change in angular momentum yields the usual formula ωz=mgl/Iω cfor slow precession [2]. In this note I drop the simplifying assumption that the total angular momentum is solely along the symmetry axis in order to obtain the following general expre ssion for ωz, ωz=Iωc±/radicalBig I2ω2c+ 4(I−In)mglcosθ 2(In−I) cosθ, (0.1) where Inis the moment of inertia of the top about any axis normal to the symmetry axis at O. There are two values for ωzifI2ω2 c+ 4(I−In)mglcosθ >0. This condition is always satisfied when I > I n. When I < I nit determines the minimum velocity ωc= (2/I)/radicalBig (In−I)mglcosθ for a steady precession to occur. Formula (0.1) is most useful for practical purposes when ωcis very large, in which case the appro- ximation√1 +x= 1 + x/2 for the square root in (0.1) when x= 4(I−In)mglcosθ/I2ω2 cis very ∗Supported by FAPESP under grant 97/14430-2. E-mail: bolina@math.ucdavis.edu 1small gives ωz=Iωc 2(In−I) cosθ±/parenleftBiggIωc 2(In−I) cosθ−mgl Iωc/parenrightBigg . (0.2) This approximation for ωzyields not only the previous formula for slow precession ω(−) z=mgl/Iω c, but also the formula for fastprecession ω(+) z=Iωc/(In−I) cosθ. In this last case, the sense of precession depends on whether I < I norI > I n. For the top shown in Fig. 1, and for most ordinarily shaped child’s top, In> I. Which precession occurs depends on how the top is set in motio n. Once it is started at an angle θto the vertical with angular velocity ωcand either of the above values for ωz, it will continue to precess steadily. 2. Analysis The analysis that leads to (0.1) is elementary and amounts to taking into account the angular momentum about the vertical direction. The angular velocit yωzhas components ωzcosθalong the symmetry axis, and ωzsinθalong an axis normal to it, as shown in Fig. 2. Thus the angular momentum about the vertical direction can be decomposed int o a component Iωzcosθalong the symmetry axis, and a component Inωzsinθnormal to the symmetry axis. Since these two com- ponents also describe a circle around the vertical directio n, the previous simplified analysis can be applied separately here for the components along and norm al the symmetry axis. Thus the correction for the change in total angular momentum in a time interval ∆ thas now two steps. a. The change in the component of the angular momentum along t he symmetry axis is what we had before, with the addition of the extra term Iωzcosθdue to the precession motion. It becomes ( L+Iωzcosθ) sinθωz∆t. b. The component of the angular momentum normal to the symmet ry axis is Ln=Inωzsinθ. The tip of this vector describes a circle of radius Lncosθaround the vertical direction. The torque of gravity changes this component in a direction tang ent to this circle. Thus the change in the normal component is given by Lncosθωz∆t. Since the changes in (a)and(b)are opposite in direction, equating torque to time change in angular momentum now leads to the equation ( I−In)ω2 zcosθ+ (Iωc)ωz−mgl= 0 for ωz, whose solutions are given by (0.1). 2References [1] D. Halliday, R. Resnick, Fundamentals of Physics , 3rd. ed., John Wiley, NY (1988) p. 272 [2] R. A. Serway, Physics for Scientists and Engineers , Saunders College Publishing, PA (1996) p. 321 [3] R. Skinner, Mechanics , Blaisdell Publushing Company, MA (1969) p. 475 3Ozω∆L =L sin θωz∆t L=Iωc θmgl sinθC Figure 1: In the simplified analysis the total angular moment um of the top L=Iωcis due solely to the rotation around its axis of symmetry. 4ωzcosθωc θsinzωωz θ O Figure 2: In the general analysis, the angular momentum of th e rotational motion around the vertical axis is taken into account. 5

1/G36/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G2A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G26/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G4F/G5C /G33/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G2F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57 /G24/G55/G59/G4C/G51/G47/G48/G55/G03/G36/G11/G03/G36/G44/G51/G47/G4B/G58/G0F/G03/G36/G58/G47/G48/G48/G53/G03/G25/G44/G51/G48/G55/G4D/G48/G48/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G27/G48/G45/G44/G45/G55/G44/G57/G44/G03/G2A/G52/G56/G5A/G44/G50/G4C/G0D /G37/G44/G57/G44/G03/G2C/G51/G56/G57/G4C/G57/G58/G57/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G29/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G35/G48/G56/G48/G44/G55/G46/G4B/G0F/G03/G03/G30/G58/G50/G45/G44/G4C/G03/G03/G17/G13/G13/G03/G13/G13/G18 /G0F/G03/G03/G2C/G51/G47/G4C/G44 /G29/G48/G45/G55/G58/G44/G55/G5C/G03/G18/G0F/G03/G15/G13/G13/G13 /G24/G25/G36/G37/G35/G24/G26/G37 /G26/G52/G51/G57/G55/G52/G4F/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G44/G03 /G51 /G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03 /G53 /G55/G52/G46/G48 /G56 /G56/G03 /G4F/G4C/G4E/G48/G03 /G56 /G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52 /G51 /G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03 /G4A/G48/G51 /G48 /G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G0B /G36/G2A/G0C/G03 /G5A/G4C /G57 /G4B/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G53 /G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G10 /G56/G57/G44/G57/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G4F /G44 /G56/G48/G55/G03 /G4C /G56/G03 /G44/G51/G03 /G4C/G50 /G53 /G52/G55/G57/G44 /G51 /G57/G03 /G47/G48/G50/G52 /G51 /G56 /G57 /G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G52 /G49/G03 /G4F/G44/G56 /G48 /G55/G03 /G56/G48/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G59/G4C/G57/G5C/G11/G03 /G03 /G3A/G48/G03 /G56 /G4B/G52/G5A/G03 /G57/G4B/G44 /G57/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G57 /G4B /G55/G48/G56 /G4B /G52/G4F/G47/G03 /G49 /G52/G55 /G36/G2A/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G57 /G52/G57/G44/G4F/G03 /G44/G50/G52/G58 /G51 /G57/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G56 /G58/G53 /G48 /G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51 /G58 /G58/G50/G03 /G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G47/G48/G53 /G48 /G51/G47/G56/G03 /G52/G51/G03 /G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03 /G4F /G44 /G56/G48/G55/G03 /G53 /G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G49/G52/G55 /G4C/G56/G52/G57 /G55 /G52/G53/G4C/G46/G03 /G56/G44 /G50 /G53/G4F/G48/G56/G11/G03 /G03 /G2C /G55 /G55/G48/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03 /G52 /G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G51/G44 /G57 /G58/G55/G48/G03 /G52 /G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G56/G03 /G46 /G4B /G52/G56/G48/G51/G0F/G03 /G36 /G2A/G03 /G48/G49/G49/G4C/G46/G4C/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03 /G47/G48/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56 /G48 /G56/G03 /G44/G56 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03 /G4F/G44/G56 /G48 /G55/G03 /G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52 /G51/G03 /G46/G4B/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G56/G03 /G49/G55 /G52 /G50/G03 /G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03 /G57 /G52/G03 /G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G57 /G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03 /G53/G55/G52/G59/G4C/G47 /G48 /G56/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G49/G4C/G55 /G56 /G57 /G48/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03 /G47/G48/G50/G52 /G51 /G56 /G57 /G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G52 /G49/G03 /G57 /G4B/G48/G03 /G56/G58 /G53 /G53/G55/G48 /G56 /G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G36 /G2A/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03 /G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03 /G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G11/G03 /G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03 /G52 /G49 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G52/G59/G48/G55/G44/G4F/G4F/G03 /G36/G2A/G03 /G45 /G48 /G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G46 /G4C /G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03 /G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57 /G4C /G52/G51/G03 /G0B/G4C/G11/G48/G11/G0F/G03 /G50/G48/G44/G56 /G58 /G55/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G56/G58 /G53 /G53/G55/G48 /G56 /G56/G4C/G52 /G51 /G0C /G58/G51/G47/G48/G55/G4A/G52/G48/G56/G03 /G44/G51/G03 /G4C /G51/G57/G48 /G51 /G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03 /G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51 /G57/G03 /G47/G48/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G03 /G49 /G55/G52/G50/G03 /G4F/G44/G55/G4A/G48/G03 /G4C /G51/G4C/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03 /G59/G44/G4F/G58/G48/G56/G03 /G57 /G52/G03 /G44/G56/G5C/G50 /G53 /G57/G52/G57/G4C/G46/G03 /G4F/G4C/G50 /G4C /G57/G56/G0F /G4C/G55/G55/G48/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G56/G11 /G33/G24/G26/G36/G03/G51/G58/G50/G45/G48 /G55 /G56/G1D/G03 /G17/G15/G11/G18/G13/G11/G30/G47/G0F/G03/G17/G15/G11/G19/G18/G11/G2D/G5B/G0F/G03/G1A/G1A/G11/G15/G15/G11/G28/G4D /G2E/G48/G5C/G5A/G52/G55/G47/G56/G1D /G36/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C /G51 /G58/G58/G50/G0F/G03 /G33 /G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G26/G52 /G51 /G57/G55/G52/G4F/G11 /G0D/G33/G4B/G52/G51/G48/G1D/G03/G13/G15/G15/G10/G15/G14 /G18 /G10/G15/G1C/G1A/G14/G0F/G03/G29/G24/G3B/G1D/G03/G13/G15 /G15 /G10/G15/G14/G18/G10/G15/G14/G14/G13/G0F/G03/G28/G50/G44/G4C/G4F/G1D/G03 /G47/G48/G45/G58 /G23 /G57/G4C /G49 /G55/G11/G55/G48/G56/G11 /G4C /G512/G3A/G4B/G4C/G57/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G52/G55/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G0B/G36/G2A/G0C/G03/G3E/G14/G10/G14/G18/G40/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G44/G03/G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G53/G4B/G48/G51/G52/G50/G48/G51/G52/G51 /G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G52/G46/G46/G58/G55/G56/G03/G5A/G4B/G48/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G44/G4F/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G44/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G03/G53/G44/G56/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03/G44/G03/G50/G48/G47/G4C/G58/G50 /G48/G56/G56/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G4F/G5C/G03/G05/G48/G5B/G53/G4F/G52/G47/G48/G56/G05/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G4F/G48/G03/G55/G48/G50/G44/G4C/G51/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G46/G52/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G51/G57/G03/G44/G57/G03/G46/G48/G55/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G58/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G55/G57 /G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G56/G03/G0B≤/G14/G13/G10/G14/G15/G03 /G56/G48/G46/G0C/G03 /G4B/G44/G56/G03 /G45/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G48/G5B/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G59/G48/G4F/G5C/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G52/G56/G46/G52/G53/G5C/G0F/G03 /G58/G4F/G57/G55/G44/G49/G44/G56/G57/G03 /G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48 /G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03 /G46/G52/G50/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G44/G50/G53/G4F/G4C/G49/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11/G03 /G03 /G27/G48/G56/G53/G4C/G57/G48/G03 /G4C/G57/G56/G03 /G5A/G4C/G47/G48/G56/G53/G55/G48/G44/G47/G03 /G58/G56/G48/G0F/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03 /G44/G55/G48 /G56/G4C/G57/G58/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G5A/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G47/G48/G55/G48/G47/G03/G44/G03/G51/G58/G4C/G56/G44/G51/G46/G48/G0F/G03/G56/G58/G46/G4B/G03/G44/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G52/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G46/G52/G50/G50/G58/G51/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56 /G5A/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G4C/G57/G03/G47/G4C/G56/G57/G52/G55/G57/G56/G03/G46/G4B/G44/G51/G51/G48/G4F/G03/G56/G4C/G4A/G51/G44/G4F/G56/G03/G3E/G14/G19/G40/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G4C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G52/G4F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G11 /G24/G03/G4F/G52/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G55/G48/G56/G48/G44/G55/G46/G4B/G03/G4B/G44/G56/G03/G4A/G52/G51/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G52/G03/G58/G51/G47/G48/G55/G56/G57/G44/G51/G47/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G36/G2A/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G56/G57/G4C/G4F/G4F/G03/G44/G03/G46/G52/G50/G53/G55/G48/G4B/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G52/G55/G5C/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G5C/G48/G57 /G57/G52/G03/G48/G50/G48/G55/G4A/G48/G11/G03/G03/G33/G4B/G48/G51/G52/G50/G48/G51/G52/G4F/G52/G4A/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G4F/G5C/G0F/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G52/G51/G47/G48/G51/G56/G48/G47/G03/G53/G4B/G44/G56/G48/G0F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G46/G44/G51/G03/G53/G48/G55/G4B/G44/G53/G56/G03/G45/G48/G03/G58/G51/G47/G48/G55/G56/G57/G52/G52/G47 /G44/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G55/G53/G4F/G44/G5C/G03/G52/G49/G03/G56/G48/G59/G48/G55/G44/G4F/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G48/G56/G0F/G03/G56/G58/G46/G4B/G03/G44/G56/G0F/G03/G56/G48/G4F/G49/G10/G53/G4B/G44/G56/G48/G03/G50/G52/G47/G58/G4F/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G49/G52/G58/G55/G10/G5A/G44/G59/G48/G03/G50/G4C/G5B/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G44/G51/G47 /G50/G58/G4F/G57/G4C/G03/G53/G4B/G52/G57/G52/G51/G03/G48/G5B/G46/G4C/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G0B/G30/G33/G28/G0C/G03/G48/G57/G46/G11/G03/G3E/G14/G0F/G15/G0F/G18/G0F/G1A/G10/G14/G14/G0F/G14/G16/G40/G11/G03/G03/G24/G03/G55/G48/G46/G48/G51/G57/G03/G56/G57/G58/G47/G5C/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G48/G59/G52/G4E/G48/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G45/G44/G51/G47 /G4A/G44/G53/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G50/G44/G57/G48/G55/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G03/G51/G48/G46/G48/G56/G56/G44/G55/G5C/G03/G46/G52/G51/G47/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G3E/G14/G18/G40/G11 /G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G53/G44/G53/G48/G55/G03 /G53/G55/G52/G59/G4C/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G51/G48/G5A/G03 /G4C/G51/G56/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03 /G4C/G51/G57/G52/G03 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03 /G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G0B/G36/G2A/G0C/G03 /G45/G5C /G49/G48/G50/G57/G52/G56/G48/G46/G52/G51/G47/G03/G37/G4C/G1D/G36/G44/G53/G53/G4B/G4C/G55/G48/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G46/G52/G51/G47/G48/G51/G56/G48/G47/G03/G50/G48/G47/G4C/G44/G11/G03/G03/G32/G58/G55/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56 /G55/G48/G59/G48/G44/G4F/G03/G44/G03/G56/G57/G55/G52/G51/G4A/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G52/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G11/G03/G03/G3A/G48/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52 /G53/G55/G52/G59/G4C/G47/G48/G03/G47/G48/G57/G44/G4C/G4F/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G0B/G52/G59/G48/G55/G03/G57/G5A/G52/G03/G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G50/G44/G4A/G51/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G48/G0C/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G44/G03/G51/G52/G59/G48/G4F/G03/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G03/G57/G48/G46/G4B/G51/G4C/G54/G58/G48/G11/G03/G03/G3A/G48/G03/G49/G4C/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G4F/G5C/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G44/G56/G48/G03/G52/G49 /G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G44/G56/G03/G46/G52/G50/G53/G44/G55/G48/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G44/G50/G52/G58/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C /G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G56/G0F/G03/G57/G52/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G4E/G51/G52/G5A/G4F/G48/G47/G4A/G48/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G49/G4C/G55/G56/G57/G03/G55/G48/G53/G52/G55/G57/G03/G52/G51/G03/G48/G4F/G4F/G4C/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G48/G49/G49/G4C/G46/G4C/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G4C/G56/G52/G57/G55/G52/G53/G4C/G46/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G2F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G48/G59/G52/G4F/G59/G48/G56 /G44/G56/G03/G44/G51/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G52/G4F/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4A/G55/G48/G44/G57 /G55/G48/G4F/G48/G59/G44/G51/G46/G48/G0F/G03/G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G47/G48/G55/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G03/G57/G55/G48/G51/G47/G03/G52/G49/G03/G44/G53/G53/G4F/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G0F/G03/G48/G4C/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G4C/G57/G56/G03/G50/G52/G55/G48/G03/G48/G49/G49/G4C/G46/G4C/G48/G51/G57 /G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G51/G03/G49/G44/G46/G57/G0F/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G0B/G52/G55/G03/G56/G4C/G50/G4C/G4F/G44/G55 /G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G48/G56/G0C/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G48/G56/G53/G48/G46/G4C/G44/G4F/G4F/G5C/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G47/G48/G59/G48/G4F/G52/G53/G50/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G47/G03/G52/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F3/G46/G52/G50/G50/G58/G51/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G5A/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G44/G50/G52/G58/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G51/G48/G46/G48/G56/G56/G44/G55/G5C/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G56/G4C/G4A/G51/G44/G4F/G10/G57/G55/G44/G51/G56/G50/G4C/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B /G58/G56/G48/G49/G58/G4F/G03/G49/G4C/G45/G48/G55/G03/G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G56/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G52/G49/G57/G48/G51/G03/G48/G51/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03/G57/G52/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G03/G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G47/G4C/G56/G57/G52/G55/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G11/G03/G03/G36/G58/G46/G4B/G03/G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55 /G47/G4C/G56/G57/G52/G55/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G4B/G44/G53/G53/G48/G51/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G45/G48/G03 /G52/G51/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G50/G44/G4D/G52/G55/G03 /G45/G52/G57/G57/G4F/G48/G51/G48/G46/G4E/G56/G03 /G57/G52/G5A/G44/G55/G47/G56/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G53/G55/G44/G46/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F /G4C/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G37/G48/G55/G44/G45/G4C/G57/G12/G56/G48/G46/G03 /G47/G44/G57/G44/G03 /G57/G55/G44/G51/G56/G50/G4C/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G46/G44/G53/G44/G45/G4C/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G03 /G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G47/G03 /G52/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F /G46/G52/G50/G50/G58/G51/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G57/G48/G46/G4B/G51/G52/G4F/G52/G4A/G5C/G03/G46/G44/G51/G03/G53/G55/G52/G59/G4C/G47/G48/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G50/G44/G4D/G52/G55/G03/G49/G52/G46/G58/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G53/G44/G53/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G47/G48/G50/G52/G51/G56/G57/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G52/G4F/G03/G52/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G44/G50/G52/G58/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G0B/G44/G56/G03/G44 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G4F/G03/G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G0C/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G03/G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G55/G44/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G50/G48/G46/G4B/G44/G51/G4C/G56/G57/G4C/G46/G03/G56/G57/G58/G47/G5C/G03/G52/G49/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11/G03/G03/G31/G48/G59/G48/G55/G57/G4B/G48/G4F/G48/G56/G56/G0F/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G47/G52/G03/G54/G58/G44/G4F/G4C/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G44/G51/G44/G4F/G5C/G56/G4C/G56/G03/G52/G49 /G52/G58/G55/G03 /G52/G45/G56/G48/G55/G59/G48/G47/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03 /G45/G44/G56/G48/G47/G03 /G52/G51/G03 /G48/G5B/G4C/G56/G57/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G50/G48/G46/G4B/G44/G51/G4C/G56/G50/G56/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03 /G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11 /G33/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4D/G58/G56/G57/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G50/G52/G55/G48/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G50/G52/G55/G48/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G46/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G05/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G52/G4F/G05/G03/G46/G52/G50/G50/G58/G51/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G51 /G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G52/G4F/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G10/G50/G44/G57/G57/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G55/G44/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G03/G5A/G52/G55/G4E/G03/G56/G48/G55/G59/G48/G56 /G57/G52/G03/G45/G48/G03/G44/G51/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G47/G48/G50/G52/G51/G56/G57/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4C/G57/G56/G03/G44/G53/G53/G4F/G4C/G46/G44/G45/G4C/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G44/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G4F/G5C/G03/G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G03/G4F/G4C/G4E/G48 /G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11 /G3A/G48/G03/G46/G52/G51/G46/G48/G51/G57/G55/G44/G57/G48/G03/G44/G57/G57/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G51/G03/G57/G5A/G52/G03/G55/G48/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G54/G58/G4C/G47/G56/G0F/G03/G5A/G44/G57/G48/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G26/G26/G4F/G17/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B/G03/G4B/G44/G59/G48 /G45/G48/G48/G51/G03/G48/G5B/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G59/G48/G4F/G5C/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G48/G49/G49/G4C/G46/G4C/G48/G51/G57/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G3E/G14/G0F/G19/G0F/G1C/G0F/G14/G13/G0F/G14/G16/G40/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G55/G44/G51/G56/G53/G44/G55/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G50/G44/G57/G48/G55/G4C/G44/G4F /G58/G51/G47/G48/G55/G03/G56/G57/G58/G47/G5C/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G44/G56/G03/G4C/G57/G03/G48/G59/G44/G47/G48/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G54/G58/G48/G56/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G47/G44/G50/G44/G4A/G48/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G44/G45/G56/G52/G55/G53/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G51/G48/G5A/G03/G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G11/G03/G03/G3A/G48/G03/G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G46/G52/G51/G49/G4C/G55/G50/G48/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57 /G57/G4B/G48/G03/G54/G58/G44/G4F/G4C/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G51/G44/G57/G58/G55/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G50/G52/G56/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G48/G47/G03/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G52/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G49/G4C/G45/G48/G55/G56/G03/G44/G51/G47 /G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G56/G52/G57/G55/G52/G53/G4C/G46/G03/G50/G48/G47/G4C/G44/G03/G4F/G4C/G4E/G48/G03/G49/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G56/G4C/G4F/G4C/G46/G44/G0F/G03/G27/G15/G32/G0F/G03/G48/G57/G4B/G44/G51/G52/G4F/G0F/G03/G48/G57/G46/G11/G03/G03/G32/G58/G55/G03/G46/G4B/G52/G4C/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G2B/G15/G32/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G26/G26/G4F/G17/G03/G44/G56 /G55/G48/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G56/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G53/G44/G53/G48/G55/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G45/G44/G56/G48/G47/G03/G52/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G49/G44/G46/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G5C/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G54/G58/G4C/G57/G48/G03/G47/G4C/G49/G49/G48/G55/G48/G51/G57/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G48/G44/G46/G4B /G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G52/G56/G46/G52/G53/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G4F/G5C/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G53/G55/G52/G53/G48/G55/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G4F/G4C/G4E/G48/G03/G2B/G10/G45/G52/G51/G47/G4C/G51/G4A/G0F/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G45/G4C/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G0F/G03/G45/G44/G51/G47/G03/G4A/G44/G53/G0F/G03/G48/G57/G46/G11 /G26/G52/G51/G56/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G57/G4F/G5C/G0F/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03 /G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03 /G52/G51/G03 /G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G36/G2A/G03 /G44/G55/G48 /G4C/G51/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G4B/G52/G4C/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G11/G03/G03/G24/G4F/G4F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03/G55/G48/G53/G52/G55/G57/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G53/G44/G53/G48/G55/G03/G53/G48/G55/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G52 /G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G50/G44/G47/G48/G03/G58/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G14/G13/G13/G49/G56/G03/G47/G58/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G2B/G52/G5A/G48/G59/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G4C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G57/G524/G50/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03/G59/G48/G55/G4C/G49/G4C/G48/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4A/G55/G52/G56/G56/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G50/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56 /G53/G44/G53/G48/G55/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G56/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G16/G18/G53/G56/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G56/G03/G44/G57/G03/G18/G16/G15/G51/G50/G11 /G3A/G48/G03/G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G56/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G44/G03/G46/G4B/G4C/G55/G53/G48/G47/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G03/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G4C/G49/G4C/G48/G47 /G37/G4C/G1D/G36/G44/G53/G53/G4B/G4C/G55/G48/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G0B/G14/G13/G13/G49/G56/G0F/G03/G1B/G13/G19/G51/G50/G0F/G03/G14/G13/G2B/G5D/G03/G55/G48/G53/G48/G57/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G55/G44/G57/G48/G0C/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G51/G57/G52/G03/G44/G03/G14/G10/G46/G50/G03/G53/G44/G57/G4B/G03/G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B /G46/G58/G59/G48/G57/G57/G48/G11/G03/G03/G24/G03/G54/G58/G44/G55/G57/G48/G55/G10/G5A/G44/G59/G48/G03/G53/G4F/G44/G57/G48/G03/G5A/G44/G56/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G59/G44/G55/G5C/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55 /G57/G52/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G48/G44/G4E/G03/G53/G52/G5A/G48/G55/G56/G03/G0B/G21/G14/G13/G13/G03/G30/G3A/G0C/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G44/G45/G52/G59/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G56/G48/G4F/G49/G10/G49/G52/G46/G58/G56/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G56/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G45/G52/G57/G4B/G03/G5A/G44/G57/G48/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G26/G26/G4F/G17/G11/G03/G03/G2B/G52/G5A/G48/G59/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G4F/G44/G55/G4A/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57 /G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G56/G53/G52/G57/G10/G56/G4C/G5D/G48/G56/G03/G0B/G15/G11/G18/G50/G50/G03/G47/G4C/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G0C/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G53/G4F/G44/G46/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G58/G59/G48/G57/G57/G48/G03/G1A/G46/G50/G03/G45/G48/G49/G52/G55/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G49/G52/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G56/G53/G52/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G18/G13/G46/G50/G03/G49/G52/G46/G58/G56/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G4F/G48/G51/G56/G03/G0B/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G14/G0C/G11/G03/G03/G26/G52/G51/G56/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G57/G4F/G5C/G0F/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G47/G52/G03/G51/G52/G57/G03/G56/G48/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G57/G52 /G52/G46/G46/G58/G55/G03/G58/G51/G57/G4C/G4F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G48/G4F/G49/G10/G49/G52/G46/G58/G56/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G03/G45/G55/G4C/G51/G4A/G56/G03/G47/G52/G5A/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G53/G52/G57/G10/G56/G4C/G5D/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G56/G4C/G47/G48/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G03/G57/G52 /G46/G48/G55/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G5C/G53/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G53/G58/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G46/G58/G59/G48/G57/G57/G48/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G56/G48/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G03/G1A×/G14/G13/G1C/G03/GB2/G03/G14/G11/G16×/G14/G13/G14/G14/G03/G3A/G12/G46/G50/G15/G03/G0B/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G47 /G58/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G44/G03/G46/G44/G4F/G4C/G45/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03/G53/G4B/G52/G57/G52/G47/G4C/G52/G47/G48/G0F/G03/G33/G27/G14/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G14/G0C/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G03/G5A/G44/G56/G03/G46/G44/G55/G48/G49/G58/G4F/G4F/G5C /G46/G4B/G52/G56/G48/G51/G03/G57/G52/G03/G55/G48/G44/G46/G4B/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G52/G5A/G48/G55/G03/G48/G51/G47/G0F/G03/G44/G56/G03/G5A/G48/G4F/G4F/G03/G44/G56/G03/G57/G52/G03/G50/G4C/G51/G4C/G50/G4C/G5D/G48/G03/G4B/G48/G44/G57/G4C/G51/G4A/G0F/G03/G52/G55 /G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G47/G44/G50/G44/G4A/G48/G03/G53/G55/G52/G45/G4F/G48/G50/G56/G03/G0B/G48/G11/G4A/G11/G0F/G03/G47/G4C/G48/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G55/G4C/G46/G03/G45/G55/G48/G44/G4E/G47/G52/G5A/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G5A/G44/G57/G48/G55/G03/G21/G14/G13/G14/G15/G03 /G3A/G12/G46/G50/G15/G03 /G3E/G19/G40/G0C/G03/G44/G57/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55 /G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11/G03 /G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G4F/G44/G55/G4A/G48/G03 /G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03 /G56/G53/G52/G57/G03 /G56/G4C/G5D/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G56/G03 /G45/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G46/G4B/G52/G56/G48/G51/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G50/G44/G4E/G48/G03 /G56/G58/G55/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G4C/G45/G58/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G52/G51/G4F/G5C/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G51/G52/G57/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G46/G58/G59/G48/G57/G57/G48/G03/G5A/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G52/G55/G03/G44/G4C/G55/G11 /G3A/G48/G03/G46/G4B/G48/G46/G4E/G48/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G58/G57/G53/G58/G57/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G49/G52/G4F/G4F/G52/G5A/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G4C/G51/G53/G58/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G45/G52/G57/G4B/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G46/G44/G56/G48/G56/G0F/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G58/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G44/G03/G45/G55/G52/G44/G47/G45/G44/G51/G47 /G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G55/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G44/G51/G03/G48/G49/G49/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G17/G13/G13/G10/G1A/G13/G13/G51/G50/G11/G03/G03/G26/G44/G55/G48/G03/G4B/G44/G56/G03/G45/G48/G48/G51/G03/G57/G44/G4E/G48/G51/G03/G57/G52/G03/G46/G52/G4F/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G55/G48 /G5A/G4B/G4C/G57/G48/G10/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03/G4C/G50/G44/G4A/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G4F/G48/G51/G56/G48/G56/G03/G48/G4C/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G52/G03/G44/G03/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G4F/G48/G10/G56/G4B/G52/G57/G03/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G52/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03/G0B/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G32/G46/G48/G44/G51/G10 /G32/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G56/G03/G2C/G51/G46/G11/G0C/G03/G52/G55/G03/G52/G51/G57/G52/G03/G44/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G03/G53/G4B/G52/G57/G52/G47/G4C/G52/G47/G48/G03/G0B/G33/G27/G15/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G14/G0C/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G50/G4C/G51/G4C/G50/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G55/G48/G56/G4C/G47/G58/G44/G4F /G49/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G5A/G44/G56/G03/G47/G52/G51/G48/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G46/G58/G57/G57/G4C/G51/G4A/G10/G52/G49/G49/G03/G50/G52/G56/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G49/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55 /G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03/G48/G4C/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G56/G53/G44/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G49/G4C/G4F/G57/G48/G55/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G52/G55/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4B/G48/G4F/G53/G03/G52/G49/G03/G2C/G35/G10/G49/G4C/G4F/G57/G48/G55/G56/G03/G0B/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G14/G0C/G11/G03/G03/G3A/G48/G03/G47/G4C/G475/G4C/G51/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G52/G58/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G59/G44/G55/G4C/G52/G58/G56/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G56/G03/G57/G52/G03/G46/G4B/G48/G46/G4E/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G55/G52/G45/G58/G56/G57/G51/G48/G56/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G56/G48/G57/G58/G53/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G44/G4F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G33/G27/G03/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G49/G52/G58/G51/G47 /G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G55/G48/G56/G53/G52/G51/G56/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G47/G48/G57/G48/G46/G57/G52/G55/G56/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G51/G52/G4C/G56/G48/G03/G47/G58/G48/G03/G57/G52/G03/G56/G46/G44/G57/G57/G48/G55/G48/G47/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G4C/G51 /G57/G4B/G48/G03/G48/G55/G55/G52/G55/G10/G4F/G4C/G50/G4C/G57/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G47/G44/G57/G44/G11 /G2C/G51/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G15/G0F/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G03/G57/G5A/G52/G03/G55/G48/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G44/G03/G52/G49/G03/G5A/G44/G57/G48/G55/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G4F/G5C /G44/G51/G47/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G56/G03/G44/G57/G03/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G28/G44/G46/G4B/G03/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G58/G50/G03/G4C/G56 /G44/G51/G03/G44/G59/G48/G55/G44/G4A/G48/G03/G52/G59/G48/G55/G03/G15/G13/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G57/G56/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G51/G52/G57/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G2C/G51/G59/G48/G55/G56/G48/G03/G35/G44/G50/G44/G51/G03/G47/G4C/G53 /G44/G57/G03≈/G19/G16/G13/G03/G51/G50/G03/G0B/G46/G52/G55/G55/G48/G56/G53/G52/G51/G47/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G52/G03/G16/G19/G18/G13/G46/G50/G10/G14/G03/G32/G10/G2B/G03/G56/G57/G55/G48/G57/G46/G4B/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G0C/G03/G3E/G19/G40/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G45/G52/G57/G4B/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G56/G48 /G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G44/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G59/G48/G55/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G44/G4F/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G48/G51/G57/G0F/G03/G52/G55/G03/G56/G53/G55/G48/G44/G47/G0F/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G45/G52/G57/G4B/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G4C/G56 /G54/G58/G44/G4F/G4C/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G4F/G5C/G03/G56/G4C/G50/G4C/G4F/G44/G55/G1E/G03/G52/G51/G4F/G5C/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03/G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G56/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51 /G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G58/G51/G47/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G56/G48/G03/G46/G52/G51/G47/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03/G44/G51/G47 /G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G03/G4C/G51/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G49/G52/G55/G48/G0F/G03/G53/G52/G56/G56/G4C/G45/G4F/G48/G03/G57/G52/G03/G50/G44/G4E/G48/G03/G44 /G4A/G52/G52/G47/G03/G46/G52/G50/G53/G44/G55/G4C/G56/G52/G51/G03/G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G46/G44/G56/G48/G56/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G4D/G58/G56/G57/G03/G50/G52/G51/G4C/G57/G52/G55/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G57/G52/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G03/G49/G58/G51/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G56/G57/G48/G44/G47/G03/G52/G49/G03/G44/G51/G44/G4F/G5C/G5D/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G47/G4C/G59/G4C/G47/G58/G44/G4F /G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G03/G46/G52/G50/G53/G52/G51/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G11 /G37/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G59/G48/G55/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G5A/G44/G56/G03/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G47/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G03/G49/G58/G51/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G4B/G48/G4F/G53/G03/G52/G49/G03/G44/G03/G47/G58/G44/G4F/G03/G33/G27/G03/G44/G55/G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G03/G0B/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G14/G0C/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G56/G46/G4B/G48/G50/G48/G0F/G03/G52/G51/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G33/G27/G56/G03/G50/G52/G51/G4C/G57/G52/G55/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G4F/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G56/G4C/G50/G58/G4F/G57/G44/G51/G48/G52/G58/G56/G4F/G5C/G03/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G52/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G49/G52/G55 /G48/G59/G48/G55/G5C/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G57/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G44/G03/G56/G52/G49/G57/G5A/G44/G55/G48/G03/G47/G48/G59/G48/G4F/G52/G53/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G4F/G44/G45/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G46/G52/G55/G55/G48/G4F/G44/G57/G48/G03/G48/G59/G48/G55/G5C/G03/G4C/G51/G53/G58/G57/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48 /G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G58/G57/G53/G58/G57/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G47/G58/G44/G4F/G03/G33/G27/G03/G47/G44/G57/G44/G10/G44/G46/G54/G58/G4C/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G56/G46/G4B/G48/G50/G48/G03/G48/G51/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G56/G03/G58/G56/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G44/G4E/G48 /G4C/G51/G57/G52/G03/G44/G46/G46/G52/G58/G51/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G03/G57/G52/G03/G53/G58/G4F/G56/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G49/G4F/G58/G46/G57/G58/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G11/G03/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G16/G44/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G4F/G52/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G52/G57/G44/G4F /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03/G0B/G2C/G36/G2A/G0C/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G55/G48/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G0B/G2C/G33/G0C/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G5A/G44/G57/G48/G55 /G44/G51/G47/G03/G26/G26/G4F/G17/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G56/G48/G48/G51/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G49/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G16/G44/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G26/G26/G4F/G17/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G50/G58/G46/G4B/G03/G4F/G52/G5A/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51 /G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G5A/G44/G57/G48/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G44/G57/G03/G44/G51/G5C/G03/G4A/G4C/G59/G48/G51/G03/G2C/G33/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G2C/G36/G2A /G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03/G26/G26/G4F/G17/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G44/G57/G03/G4F/G48/G44/G56/G57/G03/G44/G51/G03/G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G03/G52/G49/G03/G50/G44/G4A/G51/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G48/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G116/G2C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G51/G52/G57/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G58/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G4C/G56 /G44/G4F/G5A/G44/G5C/G56/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G52/G45/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G48/G47/G03/G58/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G46/G44/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G51/G4E/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55 /G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G51/G03/G52/G51/G10/G52/G49/G49/G03/G56/G5A/G4C/G57/G46/G4B/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G0F/G03/G4C/G49/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G53/G58/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51 /G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G4F/G48/G59/G48/G4F/G56/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11 /G24/G56/G03/G47/G4C/G56/G46/G58/G56/G56/G48/G47/G03/G48/G44/G55/G4F/G4C/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G52/G55/G48/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G4F/G5C/G03/G58/G51/G47/G48/G55/G56/G57/G52/G52/G47/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G47/G4C/G49/G49/G48/G55/G48/G51/G57/G03/G44/G58/G57/G4B/G52/G55/G56/G03/G44/G56 /G30/G33/G28/G03 /G48/G51/G4B/G44/G51/G46/G48/G47/G03 /G36/G33/G30/G03 /G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G03 /G3E/G14/G16/G40/G0F/G03 /G49/G52/G58/G55/G03 /G5A/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G50/G4C/G5B/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G48/G56/G03 /G3E/G14/G13/G40/G03 /G52/G55/G03 /G44/G59/G44/G4F/G44/G51/G46/G4B/G48 /G4C/G52/G51/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G48/G51/G4B/G44/G51/G46/G48/G47/G03 /G36/G33/G30/G03 /G3E/G14/G17/G40/G11/G03 /G03 /G2B/G52/G5A/G48/G59/G48/G55/G0F/G03 /G52/G58/G55/G03 /G48/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03 /G46/G52/G4F/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G47/G58/G55/G48 /G50/G4C/G51/G4C/G50/G4C/G5D/G48/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G4C/G45/G58/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G56/G03/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G49/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G50/G52/G56/G57/G4F/G5C /G46/G4B/G44/G55/G44/G46/G57/G48/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G36/G33/G30/G11/G03/G03/G24/G47/G47/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G44/G4F/G4F/G5C/G0F/G03/G44/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G0F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G52/G46/G46/G58/G55/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G44/G03/G46/G52/G51/G4C/G46/G44/G4F /G55/G44/G4C/G51/G45/G52/G5A/G03/G4F/G4C/G4E/G48/G03/G48/G50/G4C/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G56/G58/G4A/G4A/G48/G56/G57/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G49/G52/G58/G55/G10/G5A/G44/G59/G48/G03/G50/G4C/G5B/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G51/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G52/G58/G55 /G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G03/G56/G48/G57/G58/G53/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G2C/G51/G59/G48/G55/G56/G48/G03/G35/G44/G50/G44/G51/G03/G47/G4C/G53/G03/G44/G57/G03≈/G19/G16/G13/G03/G51/G50/G03/G0B/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G15/G0C/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G56/G58/G4A/G4A/G48/G56/G57/G56 /G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G35/G44/G50/G44/G51/G03/G44/G46/G57/G4C/G59/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G44/G57/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G03/G57/G52/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G4F/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G44/G45/G52/G59/G48 /G48/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03 /G52/G45/G56/G48/G55/G59/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G54/G58/G44/G4F/G4C/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G4F/G5C/G0F/G03 /G4F/G48/G57/G03 /G58/G56/G03 /G4C/G51/G59/G52/G4E/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03 /G56/G58/G56/G46/G48/G53/G57/G4C/G45/G4C/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C /G46/G52/G51/G56/G57/G44/G51/G57/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03/G45/G48/G48/G51/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G48/G5B/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G59/G48/G4F/G5C/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G3E/G18/G0F/G14/G13/G40/G03/G45/G44/G56/G48/G47/G03/G52/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G49/G52/G58/G55/G03/G5A/G44/G59/G48 /G50/G4C/G5B/G4C/G51/G4A/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G51/G03/G44/G51/G03/G4C/G56/G52/G57/G55/G52/G53/G4C/G46/G03/G50/G48/G47/G4C/G58/G50/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G49/G4C/G55/G56/G57/G03/G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G46/G52/G55/G55/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G48/G49/G55/G44/G46/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G47/G48/G5B/G03/G0BΔ/G51/G0C /G46/G52/G50/G48/G56/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03χ/G0B/G16/G0C/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G55/G47/G03/G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G03/G56/G58/G56/G46/G48/G53/G57/G4C/G45/G4C/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G46/G52/G51/G56/G57/G44/G51/G57/G11/G03/G03/G26/G52/G51/G56/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G57/G4F/G5C/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G51/G56/G48/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G56/G48/G4F/G49/G10 /G49/G52/G46/G58/G56/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G3E/G14/G1A/G40/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G46/G57/G48/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G45/G48/G03/G49/G44/G56/G57/G48/G55/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G59/G44/G4F/G58/G48/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03χ/G0B/G16/G0C/G11/G03/G03/G29/G52/G55/G03/G49/G48/G50/G57/G52/G56/G48/G46/G52/G51/G47 /G57/G4C/G50/G48/G56/G46/G44/G4F/G48/G56/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G52/G51/G4F/G5C/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G51/G52/G51/G55/G48/G56/G52/G51/G44/G51/G57/G03/G48/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G55/G52/G51/G4C/G46/G03/G50/G48/G46/G4B/G44/G51/G4C/G56/G50/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G55/G48/G4F/G48/G59/G44/G51/G57/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G4F/G5C /G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G4F/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G47/G58/G46/G48/G56/G03/G14/G11/G18/G03/G57/G4C/G50/G48/G56/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03Δ/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G44/G51/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G3E/G14/G1B/G40/G11/G03/G03/G26/G52/G51/G56/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G57/G4F/G5C/G0F/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G4A/G55/G52/G56/G56 /G52/G45/G56/G48/G55/G59/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4F/G52/G5A/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G56/G03/G0B≈/G14/G11/G16/G03/G57/G4C/G50/G48/G56/G0C/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G46/G44/G56/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51 /G44/G56/G03/G46/G52/G50/G53/G44/G55/G48/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G56/G57/G48/G51/G57/G11/G03/G03/G36/G4C/G50/G4C/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G44/G55/G4A/G58/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G44/G56/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G5A/G44/G57/G48/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47 /G26/G26/G4F/G17/G03/G3E/G14/G1C/G40/G11/G03/G03/G2B/G52/G5A/G48/G59/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G4C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G51/G52/G57/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G46/G52/G55/G55/G48/G56/G53/G52/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G58/G4F/G47/G03/G45/G48/G03/G57/G44/G4E/G48/G51/G03/G52/G51/G4F/G5C7/G54/G58/G44/G4F/G4C/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G4F/G5C/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G03/G54/G58/G44/G51/G57/G4C/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G52/G55/G5C/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G55/G48/G4F/G44/G57/G48/G56/G03χ/G0B/G16/G0C/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G51/G52/G57/G03/G5C/G48/G57 /G46/G4F/G48/G44/G55/G11 /G25/G48/G5C/G52/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G36/G2A/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G2C/G36 /G2A/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G56/G03/G56/G50/G52/G52/G57/G4B/G4F/G5C/G03/G44/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51 /G55/G52/G57/G44/G57/G48/G56/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03/G48/G4F/G4F/G4C/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G57/G52/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G44/G57/G03/G44/G51/G5C/G03/G49/G4C/G5B/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G0F /G4C/G51/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G51/G44/G57/G58/G55/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G56/G52/G57/G55/G52/G53/G4C/G46/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G03/G0B/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G17/G0C/G11/G03/G03/G24/G56/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G46/G57/G48/G47/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G51/G52 /G47/G4C/G49/G49/G48/G55/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03/G55/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G4F/G48/G49/G57/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11/G03/G03/G2B/G52/G5A/G48/G59/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G4C/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G57/G52 /G51/G52/G57/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G49/G4F/G44/G57/G57/G48/G51/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G36/G2A/G0F/G03/G52/G59/G48/G55/G03/G44/G03/G56/G50/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G48/G4F/G4F/G4C/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G0F/G03/G44/G49/G57/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G4C/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G55/G4C/G56/G48/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G0F /G4C/G51/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G45/G48/G4B/G44/G59/G4C/G52/G55/G03/G4C/G56 /G53/G48/G55/G4B/G44/G53/G56/G03/G44/G03/G50/G44/G51/G4C/G49/G48/G56/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G46/G4B/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G50/G48/G46/G4B/G44/G51/G4C/G56/G50/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G47/G4C/G49/G49/G48/G55/G48/G51/G57/G03/G48/G4F/G4F/G4C/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G56 /G44/G51/G47/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G46/G58/G55/G55/G48/G51/G57/G4F/G5C/G03/G58/G51/G47/G48/G55/G03/G49/G58/G55/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G59/G48/G56/G57/G4C/G4A/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11 /G37/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G46/G44/G51/G03/G45/G48/G03/G54/G58/G44/G51/G57/G4C/G49/G4C/G48/G47/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G49/G4C/G51/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G44/G03/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03/G35 /G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11/G03/G03/G3A/G48/G03/G49/G4C/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03/G35/G20/G0B/G2C/G36/G2A/G0C/G2F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G12/G0B/G2C/G36/G2A/G0C/G26/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55 /G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G59/G48/G55/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G11/G03/G03/G25/G48/G5C/G52/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G56/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G0F/G03/G35 /G47/G48/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G56/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G44/G03/G59/G44/G4F/G58/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G21/G14/G13/G0F/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G57/G52/G03/G55/G48/G44/G46/G4B/G03/G44/G51/G03/G44/G56/G5C/G50/G53/G57/G52/G57/G4C/G46/G03/G59/G44/G4F/G58/G48/G03/G52/G49 ≈/G14/G11/G19/G03/G0B/G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G03/G16/G45/G0C/G03/G44/G4F/G50/G52/G56/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G4F/G44/G55/G4A/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G4C/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G59/G44/G4F/G58/G48/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G35/G03/G0B/G21/G18/G13/G0C/G03/G44/G55/G48 /G47/G58/G48/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G4C/G56/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G44/G4F/G52/G51/G48/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G4F/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G5C/G48/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G45/G48/G03/G55/G48/G44/G46/G4B/G48/G47/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G52/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G0F/G03/G5A/G48 /G48/G5B/G53/G48/G46/G57/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G4C/G45/G58/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G48/G56/G03/G4F/G4C/G4E/G48/G03/G26/G52/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G51/G57/G03/G24/G51/G57/G4C/G10/G36/G57/G52/G4E/G48/G56/G03/G35/G44/G50/G44/G51/G03/G44/G51/G47 /G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G55/G4C/G46/G03 /G49/G52/G58/G55/G10/G53/G4B/G52/G57/G52/G51/G03 /G4C/G51/G57/G48/G55/G44/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G48/G57/G46/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G53/G55/G48/G59/G4C/G52/G58/G56/G4F/G5C/G03 /G4C/G51/G59/G52/G4E/G48/G47/G03 /G4C/G51 /G48/G5B/G53/G4F/G44/G4C/G51/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G56/G57/G58/G47/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G3E/G18/G0F/G1C/G0F/G14/G13/G40/G11/G03/G03/G28/G44/G46/G4B/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G56/G48/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G48/G56/G03/G5A/G52/G58/G4F/G47/G03/G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03/G4C/G57/G56/G03/G52/G5A/G51 /G46/G4B/G44/G55/G44/G46/G57/G48/G55/G4C/G56/G57/G4C/G46/G03/G52/G51/G56/G48/G57/G0F/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G4C/G45/G58/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G46/G44/G51/G03/G58/G56/G58/G44/G4F/G4F/G5C/G03/G45/G48/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G4F/G48/G47 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G44/G51/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G52/G51/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G4A/G55/G52/G5A/G57/G4B/G03/G2C/G36/G2A /G03 ∼ ∼/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G3E/G2A•/G2C/G53/G40/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G49/G44/G46/G57/G52/G55/G03/G0B/G2A/G0C/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G52/G51/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G4C/G56 /G53/G55/G52/G53/G52/G55/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G44/G4F/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G48/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03χ/G0B/G16/G0C/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G48/G44/G46/G4B/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03χ/G0B/G16/G0C/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G4C/G568/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G3E/G14/G1B/G40/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G4C/G49/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G59/G52/G4E/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G4C/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G03χ/G0B/G16/G0C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G52/G51/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G44/G4F /G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G44/G55/G4A/G58/G50/G48/G51/G57/G0F/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G46/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03/G35/G03/G57/G52/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G2C/G33/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G44/G55/G5C/G03/G57/G52/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G11 /G32/G58/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G0B/G49/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G16/G44/G0C/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G56/G03/G44/G51/G03/G4C/G51/G4C/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G56/G4B/G44/G55/G53/G03/G4A/G55/G52/G5A/G57/G4B/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B/G03/G4A/G48/G57/G56 /G56/G4F/G52/G5A/G48/G55/G03/G44/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G53/G58/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G2C/G33/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G3A/G4C/G57/G4B/G52/G58/G57/G03/G4A/G48/G57/G57/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G52/G03/G47/G48/G57/G44/G4C/G4F/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G47/G4C/G59/G4C/G47/G58/G44/G4F /G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G48/G56/G0F/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G49/G4C/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G46/G44/G51/G03/G49/G4C/G57/G03/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G57/G52/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G47/G44/G57/G44/G03/G54/G58/G4C/G57/G48/G03/G55/G48/G4F/G4C/G44/G45/G4F/G5C/G03/G0B/G44/G56/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G51/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G03/G16/G44/G0C /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G44/G51/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G52/G51/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G4A/G55/G52/G5A/G57/G4B/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G4F/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G58/G56/G48/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G49/G58/G51/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G44/G4F /G49/G52/G55/G50/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G52/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G56/G1D/G03/G2C/G36/G2A/G20/G2C/G13•/G48/G5B/G53/G3E/G2A•/G0B/G2C/G33/G10/G2C/G57/G4B/G0C/G40/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G2C/G13/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G45/G44/G46/G4E/G4A/G55/G52/G58/G51/G47/G0F/G03/G2C/G57/G4B/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G51/G56/G48/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C /G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G2A/G03/G20/G03α/G12/G0B/G14/G0Eβ/G0B/G2C/G33/G10/G2C/G57/G4B/G0C/G0C/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4F/G58/G47/G48/G56/G03α/G03/G44/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G46/G52/G51/G56/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G0B/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B /G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G03/G52/G49/G03/G50/G44/G4A/G51/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G48/G03≈/G14/G13/G10 /G14 /G13/G03/G46/G50/G15/G12/G3A/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G14/G10/G46/G50/G03/G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G03/G56/G44/G50/G53/G4F/G48/G56/G0C/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03β/G03/G44/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G51/G4A /G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03/G0B/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G44/G45/G52/G58/G57/G03/G44/G51/G03/G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G03/G52/G49/G03/G50/G44/G4A/G51/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G48/G03/G56/G50/G44/G4F/G4F/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51/G03α/G0C/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G59/G44/G4F/G58/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03α/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G44/G56/G03/G46/G52/G50/G53/G44/G55/G48/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G46/G57/G48/G47/G03/G44/G56/G03χ/G0B/G16/G0C/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51 /G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G11/G03/G03/G2B/G52/G5A/G48/G59/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03β/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G48/G59/G48/G51/G03/G50/G52/G55/G48/G03/G56/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G57/G52/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B /G4C/G50/G53/G4F/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G48/G59/G48/G55/G56/G48/G03/G51/G52/G51/G10/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G46/G4B/G44/G51/G51/G48/G4F/G56/G03/G44/G57/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G03/G48/G51/G48/G55/G4A/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G46/G44/G58/G56/G48/G03/G48/G59/G48/G51/G03/G4A/G55/G48/G44/G57/G48/G55/G03/G56/G4F/G52/G5A/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G52/G49 /G36/G2A/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G5A/G48/G03/G4A/G48/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G52/G55/G55/G48/G46/G57/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G45/G48/G4B/G44/G59/G4C/G52/G55/G03/G5A/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G35 /G47/G48/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G56/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G2C/G33/G03/G0B/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G16/G45/G0C/G11/G03/G03/G32/G58/G55/G03/G58/G56/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03/G57/G52 /G48/G5B/G53/G4F/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G52/G58/G51/G57/G48/G55/G4C/G51/G57/G58/G4C/G57/G4C/G59/G48/G03/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03/G47/G48/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G03/G46/G52/G58/G4F/G47/G03/G53/G48/G55/G4B/G44/G53/G56/G03/G45/G48/G03/G4D/G58/G56/G57/G4C/G49/G4C/G48/G47/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G56/G4C/G50/G58/G4F/G57/G44/G51/G48/G52/G58/G56 /G52/G46/G46/G58/G55/G55/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G48/G56/G03/G4F/G4C/G4E/G48/G03/G2C/G51/G59/G48/G55/G56/G48/G03/G35/G44/G50/G44/G51/G03/G36/G46/G44/G57/G57/G48/G55/G4C/G51/G4A/G0F/G03/G52/G55/G03/G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03/G46/G52/G51/G59/G48/G55/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G3E/G14/G13/G40/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57 /G50/G4C/G4A/G4B/G57/G03/G47/G48/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4A/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G11/G03/G03/G2C/G51/G03/G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G5A/G52/G55/G47/G56/G0F/G03/G44/G57/G03/G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G0F/G03/G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55 /G51/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G46/G4B/G44/G51/G51/G48/G4F/G56/G03/G52/G53/G48/G51/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G47/G48/G53/G4F/G48/G57/G48/G56/G03/G48/G51/G48/G55/G4A/G5C/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4F/G48/G44/G47/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G52/G03/G44/G03/G56/G4F/G52/G5A/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G4C/G51/G4C/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03/G4A/G55/G52/G5A/G57/G4B/G03/G55/G44/G57/G48/G11 /G2C/G51/G03/G46/G52/G51/G46/G4F/G58/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G48/G47/G03/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G44/G51 /G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G53/G44/G55/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03/G46/G44/G51/G03/G45/G48/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G52/G4F/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G53/G55/G52/G46/G48/G56/G56/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G46/G52/G51/G57/G55/G52/G4F/G03/G4C/G569/G4C/G50/G53/G52/G55/G57/G44/G51/G57/G03/G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G47/G48/G55/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G03/G57/G55/G48/G51/G47/G03/G52/G49/G03/G44/G53/G53/G4F/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G44/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G47/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03/G48/G44/G55/G4F/G4C/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G48/G4C/G57/G4B/G48/G55 /G4C/G51/G03/G4C/G57/G56/G03/G50/G52/G55/G48/G03/G48/G49/G49/G4C/G46/G4C/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G44/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G44/G56/G48/G03/G50/G44/G5C/G03/G45/G48/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G58/G53/G53/G55/G48/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51 /G52/G45/G56/G48/G55/G59/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G46/G52/G58/G4F/G47/G03/G4F/G48/G44/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G52/G55/G03/G47/G44/G57/G44/G03/G57/G55/G44/G51/G56/G49/G48/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G57/G55/G44/G51/G56/G53/G52/G55/G57/G03/G52/G49 /G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G10/G48/G51/G48/G55/G4A/G5C/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G45/G48/G44/G50/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G52/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G49/G4C/G45/G48/G55/G56/G0F/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B/G03/G5A/G52/G58/G4F/G47/G03/G45/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4C/G50/G50/G48/G47/G4C/G44/G57/G48/G03/G55/G48/G4F/G48/G59/G44/G51/G46/G48/G03/G4C/G51 /G52/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G46/G52/G50/G50/G58/G51/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G45/G48/G44/G50/G03/G47/G48/G4F/G4C/G59/G48/G55/G5C/G03/G56/G5C/G56/G57/G48/G50/G56/G11 /G3A/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51/G4E/G03/G30/G11/G03/G2E/G55/G4C/G56/G4B/G51/G44/G50/G58/G55/G57/G4B/G5C/G0F/G03/G2A/G11/G03/G35/G44/G59/G4C/G51/G47/G55/G44/G03/G2E/G58/G50/G44/G55/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G27/G11/G03/G30/G44/G57/G4B/G58/G55/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G50/G44/G51/G5C/G03/G49/G55/G58/G4C/G57/G49/G58/G4F /G47/G4C/G56/G46/G58/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G11/G03/G03/G3A/G48/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G44/G51/G4E/G03/G39/G11/G03/G2E/G58/G50/G44/G55/G44/G53/G53/G44/G51/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G4B/G48/G4F/G53/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G36/G46/G55/G4C/G45/G45/G4F/G48/G1E/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G52/G49/G57/G5A/G44/G55/G48/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55 /G47/G44/G57/G44/G03/G44/G46/G54/G58/G4C/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G49/G48/G50/G57/G52/G56/G48/G46/G52/G51/G47/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G56/G5C/G56/G57/G48/G50/G03/G58/G56/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G56/G48/G03/G48/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G5A/G44/G56/G03/G53/G44/G55/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G4F/G5C /G49/G58/G51/G47/G48/G47/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G27/G48/G53/G44/G55/G57/G50/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G46/G4C/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G37/G48/G46/G4B/G51/G52/G4F/G52/G4A/G5C/G0F/G03/G2A/G52/G59/G48/G55/G51/G50/G48/G51/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G2C/G51/G47/G4C/G44/G1110/G35/G28/G29/G28/G35/G28/G31/G26/G28/G36/G1D /G3E/G14/G40/G35/G11/G35/G11/G03/G24/G4F/G49/G44/G51/G52/G0F/G03/G48/G47/G11/G0F/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G36/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G2F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G36/G52/G58/G55/G46/G48/G03/G0B/G36/G53/G55/G4C/G51/G4A/G48/G55/G10/G39/G48/G55/G4F/G44/G4A/G0F/G03/G31/G48/G5A/G03/G3C/G52/G55/G4E/G0F /G14/G1C/G1B/G1C/G0C/G11 /G3E/G15/G40/G24/G11/G33/G48/G51/G5D/G4E/G52/G49/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G24/G11/G2F/G44/G58/G45/G48/G55/G48/G44/G58/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G3A/G11/G2E/G44/G4C/G56/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G33/G4B/G5C/G56/G11/G03/G35/G48/G59/G11/G03/G2F/G48/G57/G57/G11/G03/G16/G14/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1A/G16/G0C/G03/G1B/G19/G16/G11 /G3E/G16/G40/G33/G11/G25/G11/G03/G26/G52/G55/G4E/G58/G50/G0F/G03/G26/G11/G03/G35/G52/G4F/G4F/G44/G51/G47/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G37/G11/G03/G36/G55/G4C/G51/G4C/G59/G44/G56/G44/G51/G10/G35/G44/G52/G0F/G03/G33/G4B/G5C/G56/G11/G03/G35/G48/G59/G11/G03/G2F/G48/G57/G57/G11/G03/G18/G1A/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1B/G19/G0C/G03/G15/G15/G19/G1B/G11 /G3E/G17/G40/G33/G11/G25/G11/G03/G26/G52/G55/G4E/G58/G50/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G26/G11/G03/G35/G52/G4F/G4F/G44/G51/G47/G0F/G03/G2C/G28/G28/G28/G03/G2D/G11/G03/G34/G58/G44/G51/G57/G58/G50/G03/G28/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G55/G52/G51/G11/G03/G15/G18/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1B/G1C/G0C/G03/G15/G19/G16/G17/G11 /G3E/G18/G40/G24/G11/G03/G33/G48/G51/G5D/G4E/G52/G49/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G24/G11/G03/G25/G48/G4C/G47/G52/G58/G51/G0F/G03/G2B/G11/G10/G2D/G11/G03/G2F/G48/G4B/G50/G48/G4C/G55/G0F/G03/G32/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G34/G58/G44/G51/G57/G58/G50/G03/G28/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G55/G52/G51/G4C/G46/G56/G03/G15/G18 /G0B/G14/G1C/G1C/G16/G0C/G03/G16/G14/G1A/G11 /G3E/G19/G40/G3A/G11/G2F/G11/G03/G36/G50/G4C/G57/G4B/G0F/G03/G33/G11/G03/G2F/G4C/G58/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G31/G11/G25/G4F/G52/G48/G50/G45/G48/G55/G4A/G48/G51/G0F/G03/G33/G4B/G5C/G56/G11/G03/G35/G48/G59/G11/G03/G24/G03/G14/G18/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1A/G1A/G0C/G03/G15/G16/G1C/G19 /G3E/G1A/G40/G2A/G11/G3C/G11/G03/G3C/G44/G51/G4A/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G3C/G11/G35/G11/G03/G36/G4B/G48/G51/G0F/G03/G32/G53/G57/G11/G03/G2F/G48/G57/G57/G11/G03/G1C/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1B/G17/G0C/G03/G18/G14/G13/G11 /G3E/G1B/G40/G35/G11/G35/G11/G03/G24/G4F/G49/G44/G51/G52/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G36/G11/G2F/G11/G03/G36/G4B/G44/G53/G4C/G55/G52/G0F/G03/G33/G4B/G5C/G56/G11/G03/G35/G48/G59/G11/G03/G2F/G48/G57/G57/G11/G03/G15/G17/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1A/G13/G0C/G03/G18/G1B/G17/G11 /G3E/G1C/G40/G2A/G11/G36/G11/G03/G2B/G48/G0F/G03/G2A/G11/G26/G11/G03/G3B/G58/G0F/G03/G3C/G11/G03/G26/G58/G4C/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G33/G11/G31/G11/G03/G33/G55/G44/G56/G44/G47/G0F/G03/G24/G53/G53/G4F/G11/G03/G32/G53/G57/G11/G03/G16/G15/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1C/G16/G0C/G03/G17/G18/G13/G1A/G11 /G3E/G14/G13/G40/G30/G11/G03/G3A/G4C/G57/G57/G50/G44/G51/G51/G0F/G03/G24/G11/G03/G33/G48/G51/G5D/G4E/G52/G49/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G32/G53/G57/G11/G03/G26/G52/G50/G50/G11/G03/G14/G15/G19/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1C/G19/G0C/G03/G16/G13/G1B/G11 /G3E/G14/G14/G40/G24/G11/G03/G25/G55/G52/G47/G48/G58/G55/G0F/G03/G29/G11/G24/G11/G03/G2C/G4F/G4E/G52/G59/G0F/G03/G36/G11/G2F/G11/G03/G26/G4B/G4C/G51/G0F/G03/G32/G53/G57/G03/G26/G52/G50/G50/G11/G03/G14/G15/G19/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1C/G19/G0C/G03/G16/G13/G1B/G11 /G3E/G14/G15/G40/G2D/G11/G03/G35/G44/G51/G4E/G44/G0F/G03/G35/G11/G3A/G11/G03/G36/G46/G4B/G4C/G55/G50/G48/G55/G0F/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G24/G11/G03/G2A/G44/G48/G57/G44/G0F/G03/G33/G4B/G5C/G56/G11/G03/G35/G48/G59/G11/G03/G2F/G48/G57/G57/G11/G03/G1A/G1A/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1B/G16/G0C/G03/G16/G1A/G1B/G16/G11 /G3E/G14/G16/G40/G24/G11/G03/G25/G55/G52/G47/G48/G58/G55/G0F/G03/G36/G11/G2F/G11/G03/G26/G4B/G4C/G51/G0F/G03/G2D/G11/G03/G32/G53/G57/G11/G03/G36/G52/G46/G11/G03/G24/G50/G11/G03/G25/G03/G14/G19/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1C/G1C/G0C/G03/G19/G16/G1A/G11 /G3E/G14/G17/G40/G31/G11/G25/G4F/G52/G48/G50/G45/G48/G55/G4A/G48/G51/G0F/G03/G32/G53/G57/G11/G03/G26/G52/G50/G50/G11/G03/G1B/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1A/G16/G0C/G03/G15/G1B/G18/G11 /G3E/G14/G18/G40/G24/G11/G03/G25/G55/G52/G47/G48/G58/G55/G0F/G03/G36/G11/G2F/G11/G03/G26/G4B/G4C/G51/G0F/G03/G33/G4B/G5C/G56/G11/G03/G35/G48/G59/G11/G03/G2F/G48/G57/G57/G11/G03/G1B/G13/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G1C/G1B/G0C/G03/G17/G17/G13/G19/G11 /G3E/G14/G19/G40/G2A/G11/G33/G11/G03/G24/G4A/G55/G44/G5A/G44/G4F/G0F/G03/G31/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G29/G4C/G45/G48/G55/G03/G32/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G56/G03/G0B/G24/G46/G44/G47/G48/G50/G4C/G46/G03/G33/G55/G48/G56/G56/G0F/G03/G25/G52/G56/G57/G52/G51/G0F/G03/G14/G1C/G1B/G1C/G0C/G11 /G3E/G14/G1A/G40/G26/G11/G26/G11/G03/G3A/G44/G51/G4A/G0F/G03/G33/G4B/G5C/G56/G11/G03/G35/G48/G59/G11/G03/G14/G18/G15/G03/G0B/G14/G1C/G19/G19/G0C/G03/G14/G17/G1C/G11 /G3E/G14/G1B/G40/G35/G11/G3A/G11/G03/G25/G52/G5C/G47/G0F/G03/G31/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G32/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G56/G03/G0B/G24/G46/G44/G47/G48/G50/G4C/G46/G03/G33/G55/G48/G56/G56/G0F/G03/G36/G44/G51/G03/G27/G4C/G48/G4A/G52/G0F/G03/G14/G1C/G1C/G15/G0C/G11 /G3E/G14/G1C/G40/G35/G11/G2F/G11/G03/G36/G58/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G4F/G44/G51/G47/G0F/G03/G2B/G44/G51/G47/G45/G52/G52/G4E/G03/G52/G49/G03/G31/G52/G51/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G32/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G56/G03/G0B/G30/G44/G55/G46/G48/G4F/G03/G27/G48/G4E/G4E/G48/G55/G03/G2C/G51/G46/G11/G0F/G03/G31/G3C/G0F/G03/G14/G1C/G1C/G19/G0C/G1111From 10 Hz 806nm, 100fs Ti:S Amplified Laser PD1PD2 or Fiber-coupler for Spectrometer800nm FiltersF=50cm 1cm sample cuvetteF=10cmSpatial Filtering and Imaging Spatial Block at Focal PointND Filters Intensity gradientλ/4 Plate /G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G14/G11/G03/G03/G28/G5B/G53/G48/G55/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G56/G48/G57/G58/G53/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G45/G52/G57/G4B/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G52/G4F/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G57/G48/G46/G4B/G51/G4C/G54/G58/G48/G56/G1D/G03/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G4F/G48/G10/G56/G4B/G52/G57 /G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G55/G44/G03/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G44/G03/G47/G58/G44/G4F/G03/G53/G4B/G52/G57/G52/G47/G4C/G52/G47/G48/G03/G0B/G33/G27/G14/G0F/G03/G33/G27/G15/G0C/G03/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G03/G56/G46/G4B/G48/G50/G48/G11 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001001000 Incident Laser Circular Polarized Input Linearly Polarized InputIntensity (arb. units) Wavelength (nm) /G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G15/G11/G03/G03/G26/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G03/G4A/G48/G51/G48/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G53/G58/G55/G48/G03/G5A/G44/G57/G48/G55/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03/G59/G48/G55/G56/G58/G56/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G4F/G5C/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03/G14/G13/G13/G49/G56 /G37/G4C/G1D/G36/G44/G53/G53/G4B/G4C/G55/G48/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G44/G57/G03/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G4C/G51/G53/G58/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G53/G44/G55/G57/G4C/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G44/G56/G5C/G50/G53/G57/G52/G57/G4C/G46 /G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03/G4F/G4C/G50/G4C/G57/G03/G44/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G14/G11/G14×/G14/G13/G14/G14/G03/G3A/G12/G46/G50/G15/G1112/G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G16/G11/G03/G0B/G44/G0C/G03/G03/G39/G44/G55/G4C/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G52/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G2C/G36/G2A/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G4C/G51/G53/G58/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G2C/G33 /G11/G03 /G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G52/G4F/G4C/G47 /G46/G58/G55/G59/G48/G03/G55/G48/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03/G44/G03/G49/G4C/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G44/G46/G57/G58/G44/G4F/G03/G47/G44/G57/G44/G03/G53/G52/G4C/G51/G57/G56/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G4F/G03/G44/G56/G03/G47/G4C/G56/G46/G58/G56/G56/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G48/G5B/G57/G11 /G37/G4B/G48/G03/G47/G44/G56/G4B/G48/G47/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G56/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G48/G56/G4B/G52/G4F/G47/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G51/G56/G48/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G58/G58/G50/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G48/G55/G55/G52/G55/G10/G45/G44/G55/G56 /G44/G55/G48/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G51/G03/G52/G51/G4F/G5C/G03/G52/G51/G03/G52/G51/G48/G03/G47/G44/G57/G44/G56/G48/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G50/G44/G4C/G51/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G03/G59/G4C/G56/G58/G44/G4F/G03/G46/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G57/G5C/G0F/G03/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G48/G55/G55/G52/G55/G10/G45/G44/G55/G56/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G56/G4C/G50/G4C/G4F/G44/G55/G11 /G0B/G45/G0C/G03/G03/G33/G4F/G52/G57/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G57/G52/G03/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G03/G49/G58/G51/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G4C/G51/G57/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G5C/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48 /G44/G46/G57/G58/G44/G4F/G03/G48/G55/G55/G52/G55/G10/G45/G44/G55/G56/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G47/G44/G57/G44/G03/G4C/G56/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G51/G03/G52/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G53/G4F/G52/G57/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G52/G4F/G4C/G47/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G47/G44/G56/G4B/G48/G47/G03/G46/G58/G55/G59/G48/G56/G03/G44/G55/G48 /G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G56/G03/G52/G45/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G48/G47/G03/G45/G44/G56/G48/G47/G03/G52/G51/G03/G52/G58/G55/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G4F/G03/G47/G4C/G56/G46/G58/G56/G56/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G48/G5B/G57/G110.02.0x10104.0x10106.0x10108.0x10101.0x10111.2x10111.4x101110-510-410-310-210-1100 CCl4 Linear CCl4 Circular H2O Linear H2O CircularISG (arb. units) IP (W/cm2) 0.02.0x10104.0x10106.0x10108.0x10101.0x10111.2x10111.4x1011110100 CCl4 H2ORatio (R) IP (W/cm2)13-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.00100200300400500 Ellipticity Parameter of the Incident LaserCCl4 Supercontiuum (arb. units) CCl4 050100150H2O Supercontinuum (arb. units) H2O /G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G17/G11/G03/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G57/G5C/G53/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03/G48/G4F/G4F/G4C/G53/G57/G4C/G46/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G47/G48/G53/G48/G51/G47/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G36/G2A/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G26/G26/G4F/G17/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G2B/G15/G32/G03/G44/G56/G03/G44/G03/G49/G58/G51/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48 /G4C/G51/G46/G4C/G47/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03/G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G11

arXiv:physics/0005027v1 [physics.gen-ph] 9 May 2000Classical electromagnetism of r2spin-orbit interaction and nonexistence of magnetic monopoles H.C. Rosu andF. Aceves de la Cruz Instituto de F´ ısica, Univ. de Guanajuato, Apdo Postal E-14 3, Leon, Gto, Mexico Abstract - We first obtain the electric and magnetic fields correspondi ng to a ‘spin’-orbit classical interaction of a r2potential. Assuming that Maxwell equations hold for these fields, we infer the conditions on th e ‘spin’ vector forbidding magnetic monopoles. Let us consider Maxwell’s equations (symbols are standard o nes) ∇ ×/vectorH−∂/vectorD ∂t=4π c/vectorj ∇ ·/vectorB= 0, ∇ ×/vectorE+1 c∂/vectorB ∂t, ∇ ·/vectorD= 4πρ . The Lorentz force reads /vectorF=q(/vectorE+1 c/vector v×/vectorB) =−∇U+d dt∂U ∂/vector v, where U=qΦ−(q/c)/vectorA·/vector v(see Ref. 1). We are interested in the following case U=V(r) +/vector σ·/vectorL , 1which is similar to a spin-orbit interaction for V(r)∝r2, though we shall consider the ‘spin’ vector as an arbitrary classical vector . One can write the last term as −m(/vector r×/vector σ)·/vector v. Comparing with the general case, we get /vectorA=mc q/vector r×/vector σ. On the other hand, it is known that /vectorE=−∇Φ−1 c∂/vectorA ∂t, /vectorB=∇ ×/vectorA and taking Φ = V(r)/qleads to /vectorE=−1 q/parenleftBigg ∇V(r) +m∂ ∂t(/vector r×/vector σ)/parenrightBigg /vectorB=mc q[(∇ ·/vector σ)/vector r−3/vector σ]. Plugging these results into Maxwell’s equations gives ∇ ·/vectorB= 0→/vector r· ∇(∇ ·/vector σ) = 0 ∇ ·/vectorD= 4πρ→ρ=−ǫ 4πq/parenleftBigg ∇2V+m∂ ∂t(/vector r· ∇ × /vector σ)/parenrightBigg ∇ ×/vectorH−∂/vectorD ∂t=4π c/vectorj→/vectorj=mǫ 4πq∂2 ∂t2(/vector r×/vector σ)−3mc2 4πµq∇ ×/vector σ . The first of these results implies that nonexistence of magne tic monopoles requires /vector σbe only a linear or constant function of the coordinates with arbi- trary explicit time dependence. Ref. 1 - H.C. Rosu, physics/0005019 2

arXiv:physics/0005028v1 [physics.ed-ph] 10 May 2000Coriolis force in Geophysics: an elementary introduction a nd examples F. Vandenbrouck⋆, L. Berthier⋆⋆, and F. Gheusi⋆⋆⋆ ⋆Laboratoire de Physique de la Mati` ere Condens´ ee, Coll` eg e de France, 11 place M. Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France ⋆⋆Laboratoire de Physique, ENS-Lyon and CNRS, 46 all´ ee d’Ita lie, 69007 Lyon, France ⋆⋆⋆M´ et´ eo-France, CNRM/GMME/Relief, 42 avenue G. Coriolis, 31057 TOULOUSE Cedex, France (February 2, 2008) We show how Geophysics may illustrate and thus improve class ical Mechanics lectures concerning the study of Coriolis force effects. We are then interested in atmospheric as well as oceanic phenom- ena we are familiar with, and are for that reason of pedagogic al and practical interest. Our aim is to model them in a very simple way to bring out the physical phe nomena that are involved. LPENSL-TH-06/2000 . I. INTRODUCTION The study of mechanics in non-inertial frames, the Coriolis force effects for the rotating Earth being the paradigm, are often restricted to the standard examples of a deflected projectile and the Foucault pendulum. In these two examples, the Coriolis force is only a small perturbation . In order to make the Coriolis force effects dominant, one must consider phenomena taking place at the geophysical scale. This is the line followed by the present paper. The first section is devoted to the presentation of the basic equations. In the second section, we discuss the Physics of anticyclones and cyclones: we describe their rotation in the geostrophic approximation, and show how cyclones (but not anticyclones) may become hurricanes. The third section presents a second example of atmospheric circula- tion, the Jets Streams, which are stabilized by the Corio- lis force. We show also that these strong winds are asso- ciated with Rossby waves. The last section presents two examples of oceanic circulation: wind-driven circulation and Kelvin waves. II. BASIC EQUATIONS A. Navier-Stokes equation in a rotating frame Let us introduce two frames RandR′in relative mo- tion. The inertial frame Ris the geocentric one, with origin at the center Oof the Earth, and whose axes are along directions of fixed stars. The frame R′is fastened to the Earth. It has an angular velocity Ωwith respect toR, where Ωis the angular velocity of rotation of the Earth (Ω ≃7.29·10−5rad·s−1). The following relation between the accelerations of a point MaR(M) inR, and aR′(M) inR′may easily be obtained [1]: aR(M) =aR′(M) + 2Ω∧vR′(M) +Ω∧(Ω∧OM). (2.1) In eq. (2.1), the term 2 Ω∧vR′(M) is the Coriolis ac- celeration, vR′(M) is the velocity of MinR′, and Ω∧(Ω∧OM) is the centrifugal acceleration. In therotating frame R′, the Navier-Stokes equation takes into account the above inertial terms and reads [2]: ∂vR′ ∂t+ (vR′·∇)vR′=−1 ρ∇p+1 ρf−2Ω∧vR′ −Ω∧(Ω∧OM) +ν∆vR′. (2.2) The force fincludes the gravitational force and other external forces if they exist, ρis the density of the fluid andpthe pressure field. The dependence on Mhas been removed in all the terms for clarity. The centrifugal force is conservative. If this is also the case for f, one can rewrite the terms ∇p,−fandρΩ∧(Ω∧OM) as∇p′, where p′is called dynamical pressure . In the rotating frame, the hydrostatic equilibrium equation is: ∇p′= 0. The dynamical pressure p′reads, within a constant, p′=p+ρgz, where gis the Earth gravity field. Recall thatgincludes the centrifugal term, and is thus slightly different from the gravitational field, which only takes into account the Earth’s attraction [1]. B. Reynolds and Rossby numbers The nonlinearity of the Navier-Stokes equation makes it difficult to solve in general. It is hence necessary to evaluate the relative importance of the different terms in order to make further simplifications. This is done by introducing the different characteristic scales of the flow: Ldenotes the typical spatial extension, Uthe ve- locity, Ω the angular velocity and νthe kinematic viscos- ity. Two non-dimensional numbers may then be derived from these scales. (i) The Reynolds number is defined as: Re=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(v·∇)v ν∆v/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle=U2/L νU/L2=UL ν. (2.3) It characterizes the relative importance of the momen- tum transport in the fluid through advection and vis- cous diffusion. For the atmospheric flows studied here, typical values are: U∼10 m·s−1,L∼10 km and ν∼10−5m2·s−1. Thus, the Reynolds number is 1about 1010. A large value of the Reynolds number is also obtained for oceanic flows [3]. Hence, the Navier- Stokes equation reduces, for geophysical flows, to the Eu- ler equation: ∂vR′ ∂t+ (vR′·∇)vR′=−1 ρ∇p+1 ρf −2Ω∧vR′−Ω∧(Ω∧OM). (2.4) Moreover, geophysical flows are turbulent (high Reynolds number) [4]. For the sake of simplicity, we ignore this complication in what follows. A simple way of taking into account the relevant effects of turbulence will be pre- sented in the last section. (See section VA.) (ii) The Rossby number is defined as: Ro=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(v·∇)v 2Ω∧v/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle=U2/L ΩU=U LΩ. (2.5) It compares the advection and the rotation effects. The Coriolis force dominates if Ro≪1. A geophysical flow, characterized by a large spatial extension, may easily be influenced by the Earth’s rotation, as one typically has Ro∼10−2≪1. On the other hand, an emptying bath- tub with U∼1 m·s−1, and L∼10−1m, has Ro∼105. Such a flow is more strongly influenced by the advection in the fluid, and thus by the initial conditions, than by the Earth’s rotation. III. ATMOSPHERIC EDDIES A. Anticyclones and cyclones We consider first the situation when the Rossby num- ber is negligible. This is the case for anticyclones and cyclones since one typically has U∼10 m·s−1, L∼1000 km, which yields Ro∼0.1. In the Euler equation (2.4), we only have to keep the gravity, pres- sure and Coriolis terms. This hypothesis constitutes the geostrophic approximation . For each point Mof the Earth, we define a vertical axis ( Mz), and a cylindri- cal coordinate system ( r, θ, z). The vertical component of the velocity field is supposed to be zero, which implies that the movements of the fluid are locally horizontal. u is the radial component of the velocity field and vthe tangential one. The Earth’s angular velocity Ωis writ- ten as Ω=Ω/bardbl+Ω⊥where Ω/bardbl≡Ω sinλuzandΩ⊥ isΩ’s projection on the plane ( r, θ);λis the latitude. The flow is supposed to be stationary. In this system of coordinates, the Euler equation can be rewritten, under the geostrophic approximation, as: ∂p ∂r=ρvf, (3.1a) 1 r∂p ∂θ=−ρuf, (3.1b) ∂p ∂z=−ρg−2ρ(Ω⊥∧v)·uz. (3.1c)In these equations, f≡2Ω sin λis the Coriolis param- eter. In equation (3.1c), the term 2 ρ(Ω⊥∧v)·uzis small compared to ρg(ΩU/g∼10−5). Equation (3.1c) therefore reduces to the hydrostatic equilibrium equation ∂p/∂z =−ρg. If we consider the case of an eddy in the Northern hemisphere and assume that the velocity field is tangen- tial (u= 0), then, v <0 (clockwise rotation) implies ∂p/∂r < 0. The pressure is higher at the eddy center than outside: it is an anticyclone. A cyclone would cor- respond to an anticlockwise rotation. Both situations are represented in figure 1. The rotation senses are opposite in the southern hemisphere. AD (a) (b)Coriolis forceCentrifugal forcePressure forces Coriolis forcePressure forcesCentrifugal force FIG. 1. Anticyclone (a) and cyclone (b) in the northern hemisphere. We end this section with two concluding remarks about the presence of the Coriolis force: (i) Without this force, an eddy center is always a pres- sure minimum. However, in the case of the anticyclone, the Coriolis force stabilizes the inverse situation, with t he eddy center being a pressure maximum. (ii) In its vectorial form, the geostrophic equilibrium equation reads: ∇p′=−2ρΩ∧v. This implies that the pressure p′is constant along a streamline. When the usual Bernoulli equation is valid, pressure variations are , on the contrary, associated with velocity variations along a streamline. B. Hurricanes Let us consider an eddy (anticyclone or cyclone) whose angular velocity and radius are respectively ωandR. The Rossby number characterizing this eddy can be writ- ten as Ro=U/LΩ =ω/Ω. Therefore, the geostrophic equilibrium corresponds to a small angular velocity of the eddy,i.e.ω≪Ω. We shall now consider the case where the eddy’s angular velocity is not small compared to the Earth’s rotation. This means that the centrifugal force due to the eddy rotation has to be taken into account. In this case, the Rossby number is of order unity. In the 2frame R′, the fluid particle has a uniform circular mo- tion. Forces acting on it are the Coriolis force and the radial pressure gradient. The equation of motion for a fluid particle, located at the eddy’s periphery reads, in R′: −r0ω2=−1 ρdp dr+r0fω, (3.2) where r0is the eddy radius. The term −r0ω2corresponds to the centrifugal acceleration of the fluid particle, and r0fωis the Coriolis term. An anticyclone in the northern hemisphere is shown in figure 1a. For such an equilibrium, the Coriolis force compensates both pressure and centrifugal forces. If the angular velocity of the anticyclone grows, the Coriolis force is not sufficient to counterbalance these two forces since the centrifugal force grows faster than the Corio- lis force with increasing ω. This is not the case for the cyclone depicted in the figure 1b. The pressure and cen- trifugal forces may counterbalance each other when the rotation of the cyclone becomes faster. This qualitative approach shows that there is no limit to the kinetic en- ergy of rotation for a cyclone. More quantitatively, equation (3.2) can be solved to find: ω±=f 2/bracketleftBigg −1±/radicalbigg 1 +G G0/bracketrightBigg , (3.3) where G≡dp/dr andG0≡ρr0f2/4. Figure 2 gives the evolution of an eddy angular velocity as a function of the radial pressure gradient. In this figure, the geostrophic situation can be found around the origin (small pressure gradient and angular velocity). In the northern hemi- sphere, the sign of the angular velocity is the same as that of the pressure gradient. One can even obtain the angular velocity of an eddy by developing the expres- sion (3.3) around zero: ω≈fG/4G0. ω−ω+ Tropical hurricanes Low pressure centre ( G <0) High pressure centre ( G <0)anticyclonesExtratropicalExtratropical cyclones Tropical hurricanes Low pressure centre ( G <0) High pressure centre ( G <0)anticyclonesExtratropicalExtratropical cyclones G/G02ω/f(f >0) 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -42 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 FIG. 2. Normalized angular velocity as a function of the normalized pressure gradient. The condition G >−G0, for the existence of the above solutions, gives a limit to the angular velocity of an anti- cyclone ( G <0). One finds ωmax= 2Ω sin λ. This limitdoes not exist for a cyclone ( G >0). When the angular velocity grows, the radial pressure gradient follows this evolution and becomes more and more important. This explains why hurricanes are always associated with very low pressure. We note in conclusion that the balance between the centrifugal force and the radial pressure gradient is pos- sible whatever the sense of rotation. Thus, the existence of clockwise hurricanes in the northern hemisphere can- not be excluded. However, most of the hurricanes ob- served in the northern hemisphere are anticlockwise and result from the amplification of earlier tropical cyclones, the amplification mechanism being the conversion of the latent heat of evaporating tropical warm waters into ro- tational kinetic energy. IV. JET STREAMS AND ROSSBY WAVES The difference in solar heating between the equatorial and polar regions drives a convective cell at the plane- tary length scale, the Hadley cell , which extends in both hemispheres from the Equator up to the sub-tropical lat- itudes. The heated equatorial air rises, moves toward the poles where it cools, then sinks and comes back to the equator. When coming back, the air is deflected toward the west by the Coriolis force, generating east- erlies at the tropical latitudes which are known as the Trade Winds . Conversely, the upper-troposphere tra- jectories toward the poles are deflected toward the east. Because of the thermal structure of the atmosphere [5], these upper-level westerlies concentrate in narrow tubes of very strong winds up to 80 m ·s−1, theJet Streams . The Jet Streams are typically found at altitudes of about 10 km and at latitudes between 30◦and 40◦. However, their strength and location may depart significantly from these mean values, depending on the season, the longi- tude, and the day-to-day thermal structure of the atmo- sphere at mid latitudes. It can be noted that B. Piccard and B. Jones took great advantage of the Jet Streams for their recent travel around the world in a balloon. The Jet Streams are also useful to the planes flying from America to Europe. In this section, we propose to show how a zonal wind (i.e.along the parallels) may be stabilized by the Coriolis force. A mass Mof air near the Earth’s surface is reduced to a point G. Its coordinates are the usual spherical ones (R, θ, ϕ ),θbeing the colatitude and Rthe radius of the Earth. The velocity of Gcan then be explicitly written: vR′(G) =R˙θuθ+R˙ϕsinθuϕ. The quantity R˙ϕsinθ is the drift velocity u0of the point Galong a parallel. We deduce the following expression of the Coriolis force moment about the centre of the Earth (point O): MO= 2MR2Ω˙θuθ+ 2MRΩu0cosθuϕ.(4.1) The computation of the angular momentum of Gabout 3O, in the frame R′, yields: LR′(O) =−(MR2) ˙ϕsinθuθ+ (MR2)˙θuϕ.(4.2) The theorem of angular momentum for the point G, about Oand projected on uϕgives: −¨λ= 2Ωu0 Rsinλ, (4.3) where λ≡π/2−θis the latitude. This equation is linearized for small deviations around a given latitude λ0, leading to ¨δλ+/bracketleftbigg 2Ωu0 Rcosλ0/bracketrightbigg δλ= 0, (4.4) where δλ≡λ−λ0. The meridional motion of Gre- mains bounded, only if u0>0, which corresponds to a drift velocity from west to east. This motion is char- acterized by small oscillations around the mean latitude λ0with angular frequency ω0=/radicalbig 2Ωu0cosλ0/R. These oscillations correspond to the stationary case of a Rossby wave[6]. More generally, Rossby waves in the atmosphere are guided by strong westerlies. V. OCEANIC CIRCULATION Oceanic circulation is, of course, described by the same equations as atmospheric circulation. For large scale oceanic currents, like e.g.the Gulf stream, the geostrophic approximation (see section III A) is relevant: the Coriolis force compensates the horizontal pressure gradient, which is related to the slope of the free surface, which is not necessarily horizontal [7]. We shall be interested here in a slightly different case for which the interaction between the wind and the ocean gives rise to a current. A. Wind-driven circulation : Ekman transport The wind induces a friction at the ocean surface, trans- mitted through turbulence to the deeper layers of the sea. There is a supplementary difficulty that we can- not ignore here. The flow is not laminar, but essentially turbulent. The fluid viscosity is related to molecular ag- itation, dissipating the energy of a fluid particle. A dif- fusive momentum transport is associated with this phe- nomenon. In a turbulent flow, agitation dissipates the energy associated with the mean velocity of the current. This analogy allowed Prandtl to introduce the notion of aneddy viscosity [4]. In this approximation, considering vR′as the mean flow velocity, the Navier-Stokes equation (2.2) remains unchanged, the eddy viscosity νturbbeing added to the kinematic viscosity ν. It must be remarked that the former is a property of the flow while the latter is a property of the fluid. As far as geophysical flowsare concerned, the kinematic viscosity is neglected, since typically νturb/ν∼105for oceanic flows, and νturb/νis about 107for atmospheric flows. Let us write the Navier-Stokes equation in projection on (Oxyz), where ( Oxy) is the surface of the globe, ( Oz) the ascendant vertical, and ( u, v, w ) are the velocity com- ponents: du dt=−1 ρ∂p ∂x+fv+νturb/parenleftbigg∂2u ∂x2+∂2u ∂y2+∂2u ∂z2/parenrightbigg , dv dt=−1 ρ∂p ∂y−fu+νturb/parenleftbigg∂2v ∂x2+∂2v ∂y2+∂2v ∂z2/parenrightbigg . (5.1) For a stationary situation with large Rossby number, the acceleration terms are negligible: the velocity depends then only on space. The horizontal pressure gradient terms can also be neglected since the equations have been linearized and one can consider the real physical situa- tion as the superposition of a geostrophic current (taking into account the pressure terms) and a wind-driven cur- rent, which will now be described. We consider a solution depending on space only through the coordinate z. The boundary conditions are the following: the velocity has to be finite both as z→ −∞ and at the free surface, the stress is proportional to ∂v/∂zand parallel to the wind flow, assumed to be in the ( Oy) direction. One can solve eq.(5.1) and find the velocity field (the solution is straightforward defining W(z)≡u(z) +iv(z)): u(z) =±V0cos/parenleftBigπ 4+z δ/parenrightBig exp/parenleftBigz δ/parenrightBig , v(z) =V0sin/parenleftBigπ 4+z δ/parenrightBig exp/parenleftBigz δ/parenrightBig ,(5.2) where δ≡/radicalbig 2νturb/|f|is a distance called the Ekman depth. Typical values for δareδ∼10−100 m. “+” stands for the northern hemisphere and “ −” for the southern one. WIND Oz xy FIG. 3. Ekman spiral. The surface is generated by the velocity field v(0,0, z). 4Close to the surface ( z= 0), the current deviates 45◦, and the direction of the velocity rotates clockwise (anti- clockwise) in the northern (southern) hemisphere. The amplitude of the velocity decreases exponentially on a length scale δ, which represents the characteristic depth over which the influence of the wind is significant. This velocity field, the so-called Ekman spiral , is plotted in figure 3. The mean effect of the wind, over a depth δ, is the fluid motion in a direction perpendicular to it: this effect is called the Ekman transport . B. Kelvin waves The main difference between atmospheric flows and oceanic flows occurs near in the coastline, limiting the waters motion. This is the origin of Kelvin waves . If one considers the deformation of the free surface of the oceans, one can see that gravity acts as a restoring force, giving rise to a “gravity wave” [8]. When influenced by the Earth’s rotation, these waves are called “modified waves” [9]. Let us consider the following geometry: a south-north current, with a coast on its right (east). The coast is supposed to be a vertical wall, the water height being de- noted h0+h(x, y, t). The Coriolis force usually deflects a south-north current toward the east, i.e.toward the coast. Hence water gathers close to the coast, and gives rise to an west-east horizontal pressure gradient counter- balancing the Coriolis force. The equations describing the gravity waves are the linearized Euler and continuity equations [8]: ∂u ∂t=−g∂h ∂x+fv, ∂v ∂t=−g∂h ∂y−fu, ∂h ∂t=−h0/parenleftbigg∂u ∂x+∂v ∂y/parenrightbigg .(5.3) Taking ( Oy) perpendicular to the coast, and considering a solution describing the above situation, i.e.v= 0, u=ξ(y)expi(ωt−kx),h=η(y)expi(ωt−kx), one obtains: u=u0exp/parenleftbigg −fy√gh0/parenrightbigg expi(ωt−kx), h=u/radicalBigg h0 g.(5.4) The dispersion relation is given by ω2=gh0k2, as for usual gravity waves. The characteristic length L≡√gh0/fis the Rossby radius of deformation . At a mid- latitude λ∼45◦, one finds L∼2200 km for h0∼5 km, while for a shallow sea, i.e.h0∼100 m, one rather has L∼300 km. The surface shape generated by the Kelvinwaves is plotted in figure 4. One can notice that the sur- face undulation is trapped in the vicinity of the coast, and its spatial extension in the direction of the ocean is typically of order L. COAST MEAN CURRENTx yz FIG. 4. Surface shape generated by a Kelvin wave. The Kelvin waves are in fact easily observed, since the currents generated by tides are influenced by the Coriolis force and give rise to them. As a consequence, the coast is always to the right of the flow direction (in the northern hemisphere). On the oceanic basin scale, mean move- ments are in this case an anticlockwise rotation around a point called amphidromic point . This geometry is found in many places over the globe, the rotation being clock- wise in the southern hemisphere [9]. VI. CONCLUSION Coriolis force effects become important as soon as the spatial extension of the flow is important ( Ro∝1/L). This is the reason why the Earth’s rotation considerably influences the atmosphere and oceans dynamics. We have presented in this paper several simple examples of geo- physical fluid dynamics. We hope it will be helpful for Mechanics teachers to illustrate inertial effects with sim- ple but physically relevant examples. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank P. C. W. Holdsworth for his kind help during the preparation of the manuscript. 5[1] H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, 1980), pp. 177-188. [2] H.P. Greenspan, The theory of rotating fluids (Cambridge University Press, 1969), pp. 5-10. [3] For oceans, Re∼1011, with U∼1 m·s−1,ν∼10−6m2· s−1: the approximation is thus the same. [4] M. Lesieur, Turbulence in fluids (Kluwer, 1997), pp. 315- 320. [5] J.R. Holton, An introduction to dynamic meteorology (Academic Press, 1992), pp. 141-149. [6] C.G. Rossby, Relation between variations in the intensity of the zonal circulation of the atmosphere and the displace- ments of the semi-permanent centers of action , J. Mar. Res.,2, (1939). [7]Ocean circulation (The Open University, Pergamon, 1989), pp. 40-58. [8] L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Perga- mon Press, 1987), pp. 31-37. [9] S. Pond, G.L. Pickard, Introductory dynamical Oceanog- raphy (Pergamon Press, 1983), pp. 273-276. 6

arXiv:physics/0005029v1 [physics.bio-ph] 10 May 2000Large Scale-Invariant Fluctuations in Normal Blood Cell Co unts: A sign of criticality? Carlos A. Perazzo, Elmer A. Fernandez, Dante R. Chialvo†, and Peter Willshaw Universidad Favaloro. Sol´ ıs 453, (1078) Buenos Aires - Arg entina,†Center for Studies in Physics and Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York NY10021, USA (February 2, 2008) Abstract All types of blood cells are formed by differentiation from a s mall self- maintaining population of pluri-potential stem cells in th e bone marrow. De- spite abundant information on the molecular aspects of divi sion, differentia- tion, commitment and maturation of these cells, comparativ ely little is known about the dynamics of the system as a whole, and how it works to maintain this complex “ecology” in the observed normal ranges throug hout life. Here we report unexpected large, scale-free, fluctuations detec ted from the first long-term analysis of the day-to-day variability of a healt hy animal’s blood cell counts measured over one thousand days. This scale-inv ariance cannot be accounted for by current theoretical models, and resembl es some of the scenarios described for self-organized criticality. Running Title: Scale-Invariance in blood cells counts Address all correspondence to: Dr. Peter Willshaw, Universidad Favaloro. Sol´ ıs 453, (107 8) Buenos Aires - Argentina Email: peterw@favaloro.edu.ar Phone: +54-11-43849920 Fa x: +54-11-43839732 1The existence of scale-invariant fluctuations in nature is w ell-documented [1]. Scale- invariance refers [1,2] to the absence of a single time or len gth scale characteristic of the (temporal or spatial) pattern of change. In such cases fluctu ations happen at all scales, unlike the more familiar cases in which there is a simple statistica l spread around a defined mean value. Scale-invariance has been shown for fluctuations in h eart rate [3], gait dynamics [4], DNA nucleotide sequences [5], and lung inflation [6]. How the se fluctuations are generated by regulatory physiological mechanisms and what their rele vance is in biology is the focus of much current interest. In addition, it has been argued that s cale-invariance in itself can be the fingerprint of a biological system poised at a critical st ate, resulting in improved dynamics with robust tolerance to error, and at the same time remainin g very susceptible to change [7]. Roughly speaking, this idea of self-organized critica lity as a homeostatic mechanism is that systems with many interacting non-linear parts could fi nd themselves moving toward the critical state (i.e. “self-organizing”) simply becaus e it would be absolutely impractical to administer it in any centralized way. Here we show that the re gulation of the number of the formed elements in blood also has scale-invariant properti es. We found that the day-to-day variability in the number of platelets (PLA), red (RBC) and w hite blood cells (WBC) from two healthy sheep observed for one thousand days is scale-in variant over a range spanning from a few to over two hundred days. Even in healthy subjects [8,9] the number of blood cells fluct uates from one day to the next. Health practitioners are very aware of this fact, to th e point that these quantities are usually described as ranges or maximal limits and not as mean s and standard deviations. In other words, for these variables normality could be define d in one sense as “fluctuations within a normal range”. Figure 1 shows the daily values (over 1000 days) for blood cells taken from two healthy sheep. Overall, the values observed a re consistent with the normal range reported [10] in the literature for these animals. Sim ple inspection of the data reveals fast, medium and slow fluctuations, and a certain degree of co rrelation in the behaviour of the time series between the animals, as if they were respondi ng in a similar way to some common external factor. What is the nature of the extensive fl uctuations seen in all the series 2plotted in Figure 1? According to current understanding [8] , homeostatic mechanisms act to compensate the loss of a given number of cells by speeding u p the process of maturation of precursors, i.e., there is a negative feedback loop attem pting to maintain constant the number of blood cells. The precise characterization of the o bserved fluctuations is important in assessing the adequacy of current models, because much is known about the dynamics which regulatory mechanisms of this kind are capable of exhi biting [8]. Thus one could reject or accept classes of models, or propose the need for no vel ones, depending on the type of fluctuations found experimentally. The dynamics of any underlying control process is expected t o be reflected in the temporal correlation between the data points; this is the physiologi cally important information we are interested in. We consider here two extreme (null) hypothes es: the first is to assume a tight feedback mechanism perturbed by some jitter where one shoul d simply see a mean value contaminated with white noise. The second corresponds to th e very unlikely case that no control is exerted to compensate for blood cell losses, resu lting in a random walk motion, in which the fluctuation is just generated by the day-by-day s ummation of statistically independent increments or decrements. To compare our obser ved time series against these two possibilities, surrogate data sets were constructed to mimic the null hypotheses cited above. In Figure 2, the raw time series of red blood cells of one anima l is plotted in the top panel. Panels denoted S1 and S2 depict the surrogate series o f the first and second types respectively. The first one (S1) is constructed by re-orderi ng at random the raw values of the top panel, like shuffling a deck of cards. In this way, any tempo ral relationship between the counts on one day and the next in the original data is broken, a nd the resulting time series is white noise. Surrogate S2 is built by (1) generating an acc essory file with the day-to-day differences of the raw data in the top panel; (2) randomizing t he order of the data points from this accessory file, and (3) integrating the result over the whole length of the file to synthesize a new time series. Surrogate type 2 is therefore a random walk-like signal. By using different random orderings, one can build many example s or realizations of these types 3of surrogates. To quantify the characteristics of the temporal correlatio ns in the data we use detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) [11]. This method has been used su ccessfully to analyze biological time series, circumventing some technical difficulties, suc h as trends and non-stationarities. The DFA algorithm involves the following steps: 1) Denoting Cjas the blood cell daily count of interest on the j−thday, produce a new time-integrated series yi=/summationtexti j=1(Cj−Cav), where Cavis the average of all Cj. 2) The new series yiis subsequently divided into boxes of equal length n, and in each box a least-squares line is fitted to the data, rep resenting the trend over the chosen time interval. 3) Define and calculate F(n) as the square root of the mean of the squares of the residuals in all boxes of length n fo r a given value of n. Thus, F(n) quantifies the magnitude of the fluctuation of the integrate d and detrended time series over increasingly long time intervals. The presence of a str aight line of slope αin the log-log plot of F(n) vs. n implies a relationship of the type F(n)∝nα. The range of nover which this relationship holds defines the time span over which the fl uctuations are scale-invariant. The two extreme cases considered have expected values of α= 0.5 for white noise, and 1.5 for a random-walk motion. Panel a in Fig. 3 is a log-log plot of F(n) vs. n resulting from t he analysis of the red cells data set plotted in Fig. 2. Symbols on the right of the figure in dicate to which time series the calculated function belongs, R denoting the raw time series , and S1 and S2 the 30 random realizations of surrogates 1 and 2 respectively. The plot fo r the raw data is approximately linear over time lags n from 1-200 days, indicating that bloo d cell count fluctuations are scale-invariant. We found similar scaling behaviour in all series in both sheep. The lines of best fit gave slopes α= 0.98 and 1.00 for RBC, α= 1.24 and 1.11 for PLA, and α= 0.83 and 0.83 for WBC (sheep 77 and 78 respectively). The lowest value of the correlation coefficient r for all raw data series was 0.995. Panel b in Figure 3 illustr ates an important consequence of scale-invariance: on increasing the observation time by a factor of kthe fluctuations are found to be kαlarger, that is to say the longer we look the bigger the range o f values we will find. 4Additional insight can be gained by applying standard spect ral analysis techniques to the same series. In this case, it is appropriate to consider t he spectral analysis of the daily differences (i.e, Cj−Cj−1) of the time series, since this is of a stationary nature by construction. We computed the power spectra S(f) of each differentiated time series and in all cases we found that the square of their amplitudes scal es asS(f)∼fβ. The scaling factors αandβare related [1] as β= 3−2α. The values obtained via spectral analysis (for sheep 77 and 78) were β= 0.97 and 0.91 for RBC, (the values predicted from αare 1.04 and 1.00 respectively); for PLA β= 0.65 and 0.70 (predicted values of 0.52 and 0.78 respectively); and for WBC β= 1.14 and 1.16 (1.34 and 1.34 respectively). There is clear agreement between the scaling exponents obtained using bot h methods. The value of βprovides additional information regarding the nature of th e process, because 0 < β < 1 implies that a high value is more likely to be follow by a smal l value and viceversa, i.e., there is anti-correlation between val ues collected on successive days. The fact that we found a wide range (1- 200 days) over which this sc aling factor holds, indicate that the mechanism responsible for the anti- correlated dyn amics operates at all time scales, something that a regulatory system as a simple negative feed back-like loop is incapable of doing. We must therefore reject the two null hypotheses considered . The fact that the data is not white is surprising, since this is the most likely possib ility if there is simple feedback control such as that postulated to relate erythropoietin pr oduction and erythrocyte number. The fact that the data is not a random walk does at least sugges t that control is present, and that it is non-trivial. Substantial work exists regarding t he architecture of haematopoietic regulation, including the seminal work of Mackey [8] but int erestingly enough no model has as yet reproduced the scale-invariance reported here. W e suspect that an important part of the fluctuations we have observed reflects genuine int rinsic dynamics of the system, which possesses a very large number of parts. To account for t hese observations, models which preserve this very large number of degrees of freedom a re needed. The behaviour here reported for sheep has also been suggested [12] to be present in human neutrophil counts, 5albeit using a far shorter time series than ours. To show that this type of scale invariance is indeed present in humans without going to the extreme of da ily sampling, it could be possible to collect data from many individuals who have been subject to blood sampling and counting on at least two occasions a known number of days, months or years apart and estimating a similar fluctuation function. This could be ach ieved for example in records of regular blood donors, and will estimate the likelihood of en countering a given difference as a function of time lag. At present no information exists which health practitioners can use to forecast such simple physiological parameters in situatio ns of interest such as bone marrow transplant. If our results hold in humans, one important consequence of s cale invariance is to make it difficult to differentiate between the response to a given tr eatment and a chance value due to the intrinsic (scale-invariant) nature of this type of flu ctuations, especially if the patient is seen at long intervals. Health practitioners generally m ake clinical decisions on the basis of isolated data points, it being implicit that waiting long er or taking more samples can only reduce the variance. Our findings imply exactly the opposite ; waiting longer increases the variance! Acknowledgements: We are indebted to veterinarians Drs. M. Besancon, P. Iguain, and M. Tealdo for the collection and processing of the blood samp les. 6REFERENCES [1] A. Bunde and S. Havlin (Eds.) Fractals in Science. (Sprin ger-Verlag, Berlin ,1994). [2] J. Feder, Fractals. (Plenum, New York, 1988),p.184. [3] M. Meesmann, J. Boese, D.R. Chialvo, P. Kowallik, W. Baue r, W. Peters, F. Gruneis, K.-D. Kniffki, Demonstration of 1/f fluctuations and white no ise in the human heart rate: implications for self- similarity. Fractals, 1(3): 3 12-320 (1993). [4] J.M. Hausdorff, C-K. Peng, Z. Ladin, J.Y. Wei, A.L. Goldbe rger, Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long range correlations in the stride int erval of human gait. J. Appl. Physiol. 78 349- 358 (1995). [5] C-K. Peng, S.V. Buldyrev, A.L. Goldberger, S. Havlin, F. Sciortino, M. Simons, H. E. Stanley, Long-range correlations in nucleotide sequences . Nature, 356, 168-170 (1992). [6] B. Suki, A. Barabasi, Z. Hantos, F. Petak , H.E. Stanley, A valanches and power-law behaviour in lung inflation. Nature, 368, 615-618 (1994). [7] P. Bak, How Nature Works. The Science of Self-Organised C riticality. (Springer-Verlag, New York , 1997) [8] M.C. Mackey, Mathematical models of hematopoietic cell replication and control. In HG Othmer et al (Eds.) The Art of Mathematical Modeling. Case Studies in Ecology, Physiology and Biofluids, pages 149-178. (Prentice Hall, Ne w York, 1996). [9] D.C. Dale, W.D. Alling, S.M. Wolff, Application of time se ries analysis to serial blood neutrophil counts in normal individuals and patients receiving cyclophosphamide. British Journal of Haematology, 24, 57-64.(1973). [10] N.C. Jain, Essentials of Veterinary Haematology. (Lea & Febiger Pub., Philadelphia, 1993). [11] C-K. Peng, S.V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, M. Simons, H.E. Sta nley, A.L. Goldberger, Mosaic 7organization of DNA nucleotides. Phys. Rev. E., 49, 1685-16 89. (1994). [12] A.L. Goldberger, K. Kobalter, V. Bhargava, 1/f-like sc aling in normal neutrophil dy- namics: Implications for hematologic monitoring. IEEE Tra nsactions on Biomed. Engi- neering. BME-33, 9 874-876. (1986). 8FIGURES 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time (days)21828816 CBA106 counts / mm 3 105 counts / mm 3 103 counts / mm 3 FIG. 1. Daily blood cell counts time series recorded over one thousa nd days in two healthy sheep (identified as sheep 77 and 78). The erythrocyte (panel a), pl atelet (panel b), and leukocyte (panel c) time series of both sheep are depicted. For clarity the series cor responding to sheep 77, have been shifted upward by 15% (red), 50% (platelet) and 100% (white) of their mean va lues. Data was collected from two castrated male sheep, one year old at the beginning of data collection, fed ad- libitum and housed in individual pens, diagnosed as healthy during the period by our in-house veter inarians. A few ml of blood were extracted every morning from the jugular vein over 1000 consecutive da ys and red cells, platelets and white blood cells were counted using a manual (non- automatic) procedure. 90 200 400 600 800 1000 Time (days)-520813813 S2S1R106 counts / mm 3 FIG. 2. Raw and surrogate series (from animal 78). The raw time serie s of red blood cell counts is depicted in the upper panel. Bottom panels denoted S1 and S2 c orrespond to two examples of potential processes (i.e., the null hypotheses) which could give rise to the observed fluctuations. The surrogate type 1 time series is built by randomly re-ordering the raw data, t hus assuming a mean value contaminated with white noise having a similar density to the raw data. Surroga te type 2 preserves the day-to-day increments, and is built by re-ordering and integrating the day-to-day r ed cell count differences, therefore resulting in a random walk-like signal. Simple inspection reveals that th e dynamics of the raw data lies between the two surrogates, departing from the mean value significantly les s than the S2 surrogate (which is representative of a random walk signal) but more than the S1 signal. 10480 502380 500 610 t ky ka2.66x105 2.63x1052.51x1052.83x105 yBA 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.52345 RS2 S1 a=0.5a=1.5 Log nLog F(n)a=1.00 FIG. 3. Panel a: Log-Log plot of the mean fluctuation function F(n) (f or red blood cells in animal 78). R, S1 and S2 denote detrended fluctuation analyses of the time series of the raw data and surrogates plotted in Fig. 2 . (30 random realizations for S1 and S2). The straigh t lines with slopes α= 0.5 and α= 1.5 indicate the expected scaling for white noise and random wal k. The red cell scaling exponent of α= 1.00 is clearly different from that of the surrogate series. Panel b: A graphical demonstration of scale-invariance showing the self-affine transformation that preserves the st atistical properties of the trace. Using α= 1.00 calculated for the raw data (“R”) in panel a, if one expands th e time axis by kand the yaxis by kαthen over both observation periods (230 and 23 days) it should be p ossible to observe an excursion which occupies the entire range of yas indeed is seen in the figure. 11

arXiv:physics/0005030v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 11 May 2000The modifications of customary filtrational equation M.N.Ovchinnikov Faculty of Physics, University of Kazan, Kremlevskaya 18, 4 20008, Kazan, Russia, Marat.Ovchinnikov@ksu.ru (January 20, 2014) Abstract The usable limits of the customary and relaxational filtrati onal theories are considered. The questions of applicable the locality and lo cal thermodynamical equilibrium principles to depict the nonstationary flows ar e discussed. The experimental procedures are proposed to determine the filtr ational flows relax- ation times. PACS number: 47.10.+g Typeset using REVT EX 1The theoretical and experimental investigations of the filt rational processes in porous media makes for a long time and the complexity of such systems does not enables to descript their evolution in a simple manner. The nonlinear effects are an essetial in some situations. The locality and local thermodynamical equilibrium princi ples applicability remains to be investigated also. Below we will be take into consideration the linear theories only. The Darcy equation /vectorW=−k µ∇P (1) was obtain from experiments under stationary filtration con ditions. To descript the nonstationary processes usually used the continuously and the state equations in form m(P) =m0+βm(P−P0) (2) ρ(P) =ρ0(1 +βf(P−P0)) (3) ∂(mρ) ∂t+div(ρ/vectorW) = 0 (4) Now can produced the customary filtrational equation now as ∂P ∂t−æ∆P= 0 (5) where æ - piezoconductivity, k - permeability, µ- viscosity, P - pressure, /vectorW- filtration velosity , ρ- fluid density, m- porosity, βmandβf- compressibility of porous matrix and fluid respectively. The fundamental solution of (5) for onedimesional system is P(x, t) =Θ(t)√ 4æπtexp(−x2 4æt) (6) where Θ( t) is the Heaviside function. We can see from (6) that the customary filtrational equation l eads to infinity phase and group velosities paradox like equations for classical heat conductivity and diffusion. 2It should be mentioned that the questions of locality and loc al thermodynamical equi- librium principles applicability for the systems under inv estigation are dicussed seldom[1]. In this aspect let us assume the solution of equation (5) for t he case of plane parallel oned- imensional filtration with the constant pressure difference by the frontiers ( Pf) P(x, t) =Pf(1−x/L−∞/summationdisplay n=0(2/(πn))Sin(πnx/L )exp(−π2n2æt/L2)) (7) The multiexponential dependences pressure from time make i t possible to introduce the characteristic time of the transition to the stationary state as τ∗= 0.1∗L2/æ, where L- the distance between frontiers. Now we can estimate this t imes. Let L=100 meters, æ = 1 m2/sec, then τ∗∼103sec. If L=1 m, æ = 1 m2/sec,τ∗∼0.1, when L <10−2, æ = 1 m2/sec,τ∗<10−5sec, and in the last case we have a situation when the velosity of stationary state establising becomes more than the sound velosity in this media. It is a strange conclution. Where is the time and space usable limit s of the filtrational theories? One of the effective attempt to resolve this situation is the r elaxational theory [2]. This theory takes into account that the local equilibriun is esta blished in time with the according the next relaxational equation ( τw- time of relaxation) /vectorW+τw∂/vectorW ∂t=−k µ∇P (8) Actually this is the local nonequilibrium procedure. In acc ording (8) we come to the hiperbolic equation ∂P ∂t+τw∂2 ∂t2P−æ∆P= 0 (9) with the finite phase and group velocities ( Vph=/radicalBig (æ/τ)). In some cases author written relaxation equation in the doub le relaxational form /vectorW+τw∂/vectorW ∂t=−k µ∇(P+τP∂P ∂t) (10) and in that event we returns to parabolic form the filtrationa l equation with the infinite group and phase velosities 3∂P ∂t+τw∂2 ∂t2P−æ∆(P+τp∂P ∂t) = 0 (11) Vph=Re(√ωæ/radicalBigg 1 +iωτp −i+ωτw) (12) To test the validity the relaxational filtration theory we ma y to carry out the experiments with so calles filtrational waves, when the harmonic oscilla tions of pressure is created in porous media. In case ωτ << 1 the relatation theory leads to the declination ∼ωτ/2 in phase velosities relative to customary equations (5). But i n high frequences the relaxation theory have to tends to Biot [3] theory for waves in saturated porous media. So, it is nesessary to explore the investigations in this area. For in stance we can investigate this process by means of molecular dynamics simulation [4] and pr oduce the filtrational law averiging the Navier and Stokes equation [5]. 41. Sobolev S. L. Phys.Rev. E, 55 4, 1997. 2. Molokovich Yu.M. Izvestia vuzov. Mathematics, 1977, 8, p p.49-55. 3. Biot M.A. J.Acoust.Soc.Amer., vol.88, 1956, pp.168-186 . 4. Ovchinnikov M.N. (in press). 5. Sanchez-Palencia E. Int.Jour.Eng.Sci., 1974, 12, pp.33 1-351. 5

arXiv:physics/0005031v1 [physics.gen-ph] 11 May 2000A Nonstandard Derivation for the Special Theory of Relativi ty* Robert A. Herrmann Mathematics Department U. S. Naval Academy 572C Holloway Rd Annapolis ,MD 21402-5002 USA 21 SEP 1993 Abstract: Using properties of the nonstandard physical world ,a new fundamental derivation for all of the effects of the Special T heory of Relativity is given. This fundamental derivation removes a ll the con- tradictions and logical errors in the original derivation a nd leads to the fundamental expressions from which Prokhovnik [7] derives the basic Special Theory transformations. However ,it is shown that the correct interpretation is completely distinct from Prokhovnik’s. It is shown that the Special Theory effects are but manifestations of the inte raction be- tween our natural world and a nonstandard substratum. This d erivation eliminates the controversy associated with any physically unexplained universal time dilation and length contraction. It is shown that there is no such thing as a universal time dilation and length contrac tion but , rather,there are alterations in pure numerical quantities associa ted with an electromagnetic interaction with a NSP-world substratu m. 1. The Fundamental Postulates. There are various Principles of Relativity. The most genera l and least justified is the one as stated by Dingle “ There is no meaning in absolute motion. By saying that such motion has no meaning ,we assert that there is no observable effect by which we can determine whether an object is absolutely at res t or in motion ,or whether it is moving with one velocity or another.”[1, p. 1] T hen we have Einstein’s statements that “I. The laws of motion are equally valid for a ll inertial frames of reference. II. The velocity of light is invariant for all i nertial systems ,being independent of the velocity of its source; more exactly ,the measure of this velocity (of light) is constant , c,for all observers.”[7, pp. 6-7] I point out that Einstein’s original derivation in his 1905 paper ( Ann. der Phys. 17: 891) uses certain well know processes related to partial differential calculus. In 1981 [5] and 1991 [2] ,it was discovered that the intuitive concepts asso- ciated with the Newtonian laws of motion were inconsistent w ith respect to the mathematical theory of infinitesimals when applied to a theo ry for light propaga- tion. The apparent nonballistic nature of light propagatio n when transferred to *This is an expanded version of the paper: Herrmann ,R. A.,Special relativity and a nonstandard substratum ,Speculat. Sci. Technol. ,17(1994) ,2-10. 1infinitesimal world would also yield a nonballistic behavio r. Consequently ,there is an absolute contradiction between Einstein’s postulate II and the deriva- tion employed. This contradiction would not have occurred if it had not been assumed that the ether followed the principles of Newtonian physics with respect to electromagnetic propagation. [Note: On Nov. 14 ,1992,when the information in this article was formally presented ,I listed various predicates that Einstein used and showed the specific places within the derivations where t he predicate’s domain was altered without any additional argument. Thus ,I gave specific examples of the model theoretic error of generalization.] I mention that Lorentz speculated that ether theory need not correspond di- rectly to the mathematical structure but could not show what the correct corre- spondence would be. Indeed ,if one assumes that the (mathematical) substratum satisfies the most basic concept associated with an inertial system that a body can be considered in a state of rest or uniform motion unless acte d upon by a force ,then the expression F=ma,among others ,must be altered for infinitesimal substratum behavior. Further ,the substratum ,when light propagation is discussed ,does not follow the Galilean rules for velocity composition. The add itive rules are followed but no subtraction is allowed for real substratum velocitie s exterior to the Euclidean monads. Indeed ,subtraction is replaced by the velocity metric d(ωi, ωj) =|ωi−ωj|. The derivation in section 3 removes all contradictions by ap plying the most sim- plistic Galilean properties of motion ,including the ballistic property ,but only to behavior within a Euclidean monad. As discussed in section 3 ,the use of the NSP-world (i.e. nonstandard physi- cal world ) substratum allows for the elimination of the well-known Sp ecial Theory “interpretation” contradiction that the mathematical mod el uses the concepts of Newtonian absolute time and space ,and,yet,one of the major interpretations is that there is no such thing as absolute time or absolute space . Certain general principles for substratum light propagati on will be specifically stated in section 3. These principles can be gathered togeth er as follows: (1) There is a nonstandard electromagnetic field (or simply a substratum ) that sustains N-world electromagnetic propagation. Such propagation follows th e infinitesimally presented laws of Galilean dynamics ,when restricted to monadic clusters ,and the monadic clusters follow an additive and metric property for linear r elative motion when considered collectively. [The term “nonstandard electromagnetic field” should only be construed as an entity ,a substratum ,where the propagation of electromagnetic radiation follows slightly different principles than withi n the natural world.] (2) The motion of light-clocks within the N-world (natural worl d) is associated with one single effect. This effect is an alteration in the appropri ate light-clock counts. [The light-clock concept will be explicitly defined at the en d of section 3.] It will be shown later that an actual physical cause may be associate d with all Special Theory verified physical alterations. Thus the Principle of Relativity ,in its general form,and the inconsistent portions of the Einstein principles ar e eliminated from consideration and ,as will be shown ,the existence of a special type of substratum 2can be assumed without contradicting experimental evidenc e. In modern Special Theory interpretations [1] [6] ,it is claimed that the effect of “length contraction” has no physical meaning ,whereas time dilation does. This is probably true if ,indeed ,the Special Theory is actually based upon the intrin- sic N-world concepts of length and time. What follows will fu rther demonstrate that the Special Theory is a light propagation theory ,as has been previously ar- gued by others ,and that the so-called “length contraction” and time dilati on can both be interpreted as physically real effects when they are d escribed in terms of a substratum. The effects are only relative to a theory of light propagation. 2. Pre-derivation Comments. Recently [2]–[4] ,nonstandard analysis [8] has proved to be a very significant tool in investigating the mathematical foundations for var ious physical theories. In 1988 [4] ,we discussed how the methods of nonstandard analysis ,when applied to the symbols that appear in statements from a physical theory ,lead formally to a pregeometry and the entities termed as subparticles. One of the goals of NSP-world research is the re-examination of the foundations for vario us controversial N-world theories and the eventual elimination of such controversie s by viewing such theories as but restrictions of more simplistic NSP-world concepts. This also leads to indirect evidence for the actual existence of the NSP-world. The Special Theory of Relativity still remains a very contro versial theory due to its philosophical implications. Prokhovnik [7] produced a derivation that yields all of the appropriate transformation formulas based upon a lig ht propagation theory , but unnecessarily included an interpretation of the so-cal led Hubble textural ex- pansion of our universe as an additional ingredient. The der ivation we give in this article shows that properties of a NSP-world electromagnet ic substratum also lead to Prokhovnik’s expression (6.3.2) in reference [7] and fro m which all of the ap- propriate transformations can be derived. However ,rather than considering the Hubble expansion as directly related to Special Relativity ,it is shown that one only needs to consider simplistic NSP-world behavior for light p ropagation and the mea- surement of time by means of N-world light-clocks. This lead s to the conclusion that all Special Theory effects may be produced by a dense subs tratum within the NSP-world. Such an electromagnetic substratum – an ether – y ields all N-world Special Theory effects. 3. The derivation The major natural system in which we exist locally is a space- time system. “Empty” space-time has only a few characterizations when vi ewed from an Eu- clidean perspective. We investigate ,from the NSP-world viewpoint ,electromag- netic propagation through a Euclidean neighborhood of spac e-time. Further ,we assume that light is such a propagation. One of the basic prec epts of infinitesimal 3modeling is the experimentally verified simplicity of such a local system. For ac- tual time intervals ,certain physical processes take on simplistic description s. These NSP-world descriptions are represented by the exact same de scription restricted to infinitesimal intervals. Let [ a, b], a/ne}ationslash=b, a > 0,be an objectively real time interval and let t∈(a, b). The term “time” as used above is very misunderstood. There ar e various viewpoints relative to its use within mathematics. Often ,it is but a term used in mathematical modeling ,especially within the calculus. It is a catalyst so to speak. It is a modeling technique used due to the necessity for infini tesimalizing physical measures. The idealized concept for the “smoothed out” mode l for distance measure appears acceptable. Such an acceptance comes from the use of the calculus in such areas as quantum electrodynamics where it has great predict ive power. In the subatomic region ,the assumption that geometric measures have physical meani ng, even without the ability to measure by external means is just ified as an appropriate modeling technique. Mathematical procedures applied to re gions “smaller than” those dictated by the uncertainty principle are accepted al though the reality of the infinitesimals themselves need not be assumed. On the other h and,for this modeling technique to be applied ,the rules for ideal infinitesimalizing should be followed. The infinitesimalizing of ideal geometric measures is allow ed. But ,with respect to the time concept this is not the case. Defining measurement s of time as repre- sented by the measurements of some physical periodic proces s is not the definition upon which the calculus is built. Indeed ,such processes cannot be infinitesimalized. To infinitesimalize a physical measurement using physical e ntities ,the entities being observed must be capable of being smoothed out in an ideal sen se. This means that only the macroscopic is considered ,the atomic or microscopic is ignored. Under this condition ,you must be able to subdivide the device into “smaller and sma ller” pieces. The behavior of these pieces can then be transferred to the world of the in- finitesimals. Newton based the calculus not upon geometric a bstractions but upon observable mechanical behavior. It was this mechanical beh avior that Newton used to define physical quantities that could be infinitesimalize d. This includes the defi- nition of “time.” All of Newton’s ideas are based upon velocities as the definin g concept. The notation that uniform (constant) velocity exists for an obj ect when that object is not affected by anything ,is the foundation for his mechanical observations. This is an ideal velocity ,a universal velocity concept. The modern approach would be to add the term “measured” to this mechanical concept. This w ill not change the concept ,but it will make it more relative to natural world processes a nd a required theory of measure. This velocity concept is couple d with a smoothed out scale,a ruler ,for measurement of distance. Such a ruler can be infinitesima lized. From observation ,Newton then infinitesimalized his uniform velocity concept . This produces the theory of fluxions. Where does universal or ideal Newton time come into this pict ure? It is simply a defined quantity based upon the length and velocity concept . Observationally , 4it is the “thing” we call time that has passed when a test parti cle with uniform velocity first crosses a point marked on a scale and then cross es a second point marked on the same scale. This is in the absence of any physica l process that will alter either the constant velocity or the scale. Again this d efinition would need to be refined by inserting the word “measured.” Now with Einstein relativity ,we are told that measured quantities are effected by various physical processes. All theories must be operati onal in that the concept of measure must be included. But ,the calculus is used. Thus ,unless there is an actual physical entity that can be substituted for the Newto n’s ideal velocity ,then any infinitesimalizing process would contradict the actual rules of application of the calculus to the most basic of physical measures. But ,the calculus is used to calculate the measured quantities. Hence ,we are in a quandary. Either there is no physical basis for mathematical models based upon the cal culus,and hence only selected portions can be realized while other selected port ions are simple parameters not relating to reality in any manner ,or the calculus is the incorrect mathematical structure for the calculations. Fortunately ,nature has provided us with the answer as to why the calculus ,when properly interpreted ,remains such a powerful tool to calculate the measures that describe observed physical beh avior. In the 1930s ,it was realized that the measured uniform velocity of the to- and-fro velocity of electromagnetic radiation ,(i.e. light) is the only known natural entity that will satisfy the Newtonian requirements for an i deal velocity and the concepts of space-time and from which the concept of time its elf can be defined. The first to utilize this in relativity theory was Milne. This fact I learned after the first draughts of this paper were written and gives histor ical verification of this paper’s conclusions. Although ,it might be assumed that such a uniform velocity concept as the speed of light in vacuo cannot be infinitesimalized ,this is not the case. Such infinitesimalizing comes from the simple process of “scale changing” for a smoothed out ruler. What this means is that at its most basic level,conceptually , ideal time or universal Newton time does have operational me aning and can be used as a physical foundation for “time” within the calculus. As H. Dingle states it ,“The second point is that the conformability of light to Newton mechanics . . . makes it possible to define correspondi ng units of space and time in terms of light instead of Newton’s hypothetical ‘uni formly moving body.’ ” [The Relativity of Time ,Nature ,144(1939): 888–890.] It was Milne who first (1933) attempted ,for the Special Theory ,to use this definition for a “Kinematic Relativity” [ Kinematic Relativity ,Oxford University Press ,Oxford ,1948] but failed to extend it successfully to the space-time environment. In what follows such a universal time concept is being used and infinitesimalized. It will be seen ,however , that based upon this time concept another time notion is defin ed,and this is the actual time notion that must be used to account for the physic al changes that seem to occur due to physical processes. In practice ,the universal time is eliminated from the calculations and is replaced by defined “Einstein ti me.” It is shown that Einstein time can be infinitesimalized through the use of the definable “infinitesimal 5light-clocks” and gives an exact measurement. Our first assumption is based entirely upon the logic of infini tesimal analysis , reasoning ,modeling and subparticle theory. (i) “Empty” space within our universe ,from the NSP-world viewpoint ,is composed of a dense-like substratum that sustains , comprises and yields N-world Special Theory effects. These s ub- stratum effects are electromagnetic in character. This substratum is the medium through which the effects appea r to propagate and may comprise the objects that yield these effects. The next as sumption is convinc- ingly obtained from a simple and literal translation of the c oncept of infinitesimal reasoning. (ii) Any N-world position from or through which an electroma g- netic effect appears to propagate ,when viewed from the NSP- world,is embedded into a disjoint “monadic cluster” of substra- tum entities where this monadic cluster mirrors the same unu sual order properties ,with respect to propagation ,as the nonstandard ordering of the nonarchimedian field of hyperreal numbers∗IR.[2] A monadic cluster may be a set of substratum subparticles loc ated within a monad of the standard N-world position. The propaga tion properties within each such monad are identical. In what follows ,consider two (local) fundamental pairs of N-world electrom ag- netic propagation sources F1, F2that are in nonzero uniform (constant) NSP-world linear and relative motion. Our interest is in what effect suc h nonzero velocity might have upon such propagation. Within the NSP-world ,this uniform and linear motion is measured by the number wthat is near to a standard number ωand this velocity is measured with respect to a private NSP-world time and a sta tionary subparticle field. The same NSP-world linear ruler is used in both the NSP- world and the N- world. The only difference is that the ruler is restricted to t he N-world when such measurements are made. N-world time is measured by only one t ype of machine – the light-clock. The concept of the light-clock is to be cons idered as any clock-like apparatus that utilizes either directly or indirectly elec tromagnetic radiation. As it will be detailed ,due to the different propagation effects of electromagnetic r adiation within the two “worlds ,” measured N-world light-clock time need not be the same as the NSP-world time. Further ,the NSP-world ruler is the measure used to define the N-world light-clock. Experiments show that for small time intervals [ a, b] the Galilean theory of average velocities (speeds) suffices to give accurate inform ation relative to the com- positions of such velocities. Let there be an internal funct ionq:∗[a, b]→∗IR, where qrepresents in the NSP-world a distance function. Also ,let nonnegative and internal ℓ:∗[a, b]→∗IRbe a function that yields the NSP-world velocity of the electromagnetic propagation at any t∈∗[a, b].As usual µ(t) denotes the monad of standard t. 6The general and correct methods of infinitesimal modeling st ate that ,within the internal portion of the NSP-world ,two measures m1andm2areindistinguishable for dt (notation m1∼m2) if and only if for nonzero infinitesimal dt∈µ(0), m1 dt−m2 dt∈µ(0). (3.1) Intuitively ,indistinguishable in this sense means that ,although within the NSP- world the two measures are only equivalent and not necessari ly equal ,thefirst level (or first-order) effects these measures represent over dtare indistinguishable within the N-world (i.e. they appear to be equal.) In the following discussion and for convenience only ,photon terminology is used. Within the N-world our photons need not be conceived of as particles in the sense that there is a nonzero finite N-world distance between individual photons. Our photons may be finite combinations of intermediate subparticles that exhi bit, when the standard part operator is applied ,basic electromagnetic field properties. They need not be discrete objects when viewed from the N-worl d,but rather they could just as well give the appearance of a dense substratum. Of course ,this dense substratum is not the usual notion of an “a ether” (i.e. ether ) for it is not a subset of the N-world. This dense-like substratum is called the nonstandard electromagnetic field – NSEM field . [Note: It is possible that this NSEM is the subquantum regio n that generates the effects of the postulated zero-point (rad iation) field, the ZPF.] Again photon can be considered as but a convenient term used t o discuss electro- magnetic propagation. Now for another of our simplistic phy sical assumptions. (iii) In a N-world convex space neighborhood Itraced out over the time interval [ a, b],the NSEM field disturbances appear to propa- gate linearly. As we proceed through this derivation ,other such assumptions will be identified. The functions q, ℓneed to satisfy some simple mathematical characteristic. The best known within nonstandard analysis is the concept of S-continuity [8]. So , letq(x)/x(a velocity type expression) and ℓbe S-continuous on [ a, b] and ℓlimited (i.e. finite) on [ a, b].From compactness , q(x)/xandℓare S-continuous on∗[a, b] andℓis limited on∗[a, b].Obviously ,bothqandℓmay have infinitely many totally different NSP-world characteristics of which we could have n o knowledge. But the function qrepresents within the NSP-world the distance traveled with linear units by an identifiable NSEM field disturbance. It follows from all of this that for each t∈[a, b] and t′∈µ(t)∩∗[a, b], q(t′) t′−q(t) t∈µ(0);ℓ(t′)−ℓ(t)∈µ(0). (3.2) Expressions (3.2) give relations between nonstandard t′∈µ(t) and the standard t. Recall that if x, y∈∗IR,thenx≈yiffx−y∈µ(0). 7From (3.2) ,it follows that for each dt∈µ(0) such that t+dt∈µ(t)∩∗[a, b] q(t+dt) t+dt≈q(t) t, (3.3) ℓ(t+dt) +q(t+dt) t+dt≈ℓ(t) +q(t) t. (3.4) One important observation is necessary. The fact that the fu nction ℓhas been evaluated at t+dtis not necessary for (3.4) to hold for it will also hold for any t′∈µ(t) and ℓ(t′) substituted for ℓ(t+dt).But since we are free to choice any value t′∈µ(t),selecting particular values will allow our derivation to pr oceed to an appropriate N-world conclusion. From (3.4) ,we have that /parenleftbigg ℓ(t+dt) +q(t+dt) t+dt/parenrightbigg dt∼/parenleftbigg ℓ(t) +q(t) t/parenrightbigg dt. (3.5) It is now that we begin our application of the concepts of clas sical Galilean composition of velocities but restrict these ideas to the NS P-world monadic clus- ters and the notion of indistinguishable effects. You will no tice that within the NSP-world the transfer of the classical concept of equality of constant or average quantities is replaced by the idea of indistinguishable. At the moment t∈[a, b] that the standard part operator is applied ,an effect is transmitted through the field as follows: (iv) For each dt∈µ(0) and t∈[a, b] such that t+dt∈∗[a, b], the NSP-world distance q(t+dt)−q(t) (relative to dt) traveled by the NSEM effect within a monadic cluster is indistinguisha ble fordtfrom the distance produced by the Galilean composition of velocities. From (iv) ,it follows that q(t+dt)−q(t)∼/parenleftbigg ℓ(t+dt) +q(t+dt) t+dt/parenrightbigg dt. (3.6) And from (3.5) , q(t+dt)−q(t)∼/parenleftbigg ℓ(t) +q(t) t/parenrightbigg dt. (3.7) Expression (3.7) is the basic result that will lead to conclu sions relative to the Special Theory of relativity. In order to find out exactly wha t standard functions will satisfy (3.7) ,let arbitrary t1∈[a, b] be the standard time at which electromagnetic propagation begins from source F1.Next,letq=∗sbe an extended standard function and sis continuously differentiable on [ a, b].Applying the definition of ∼, yields ∗s(t+dt)−s(t) dt≈ℓ(t) +s(t) t. (3.8) 8Note that ℓis microcontinuous on∗[a, b].For each t∈[a, b],the value ℓ(t) is limited. Hence ,letst(ℓ(t)) =v(t)∈IR.From Theorem 1.1 in [3] or 7.6 in [10] , vis continuous on [ a, b].[See note 1 part a.] Now (3.8) may be rewritten as ∗/parenleftbiggd(s(t)/t) dt/parenrightbigg =∗v(t) t, (3.9) where all functions in (3.9) are *-continuous on∗[a, b].Consequently ,we may apply the *-integral to both sides of (3.9). [See note 1 part b.] Now (3.9) implies that for t∈[a, b] s(t) t=∗/integraldisplayt t1∗v(x) xdx, (3.10) where ,fort1∈[a, b], s(t1) has been initialized to be zero. Expression (3.10) is of interest in that it shows that althou gh (iv) is a simplistic requirement for monadic clusters and the requirement that q(x)/xbe S-continuous is a customary property ,they do not lead to a simplistic NSP-world function ,even when view at standard NSP-world times. It also shows that the light-clock assump- tion was necessary in that the time represented by (3.10) is r elated to the distance traveled and unknown velocity of an identifiable NSEM field di sturbance. It is also obvious that for pure NSP-world times the actual path of moti on of such propaga- tion effects is highly nonlinear in character ,although within a monadic cluster the distance∗s(t+dt)−s(t) is indistinguishable from that produced by the linear-lik e Galilean composition of velocities. Further ,it is the standard function in (3.10) that allows us to cross o ver to other monadic clusters. Thus ,substituting into (3.7) yields ,since the propagation behavior in all monadic clusters is identical , ∗s(t+dt)−s(t)∼/parenleftBig ∗v(t) +/parenleftBig ∗/integraltextt t1∗v(x)/xdx/parenrightBig/parenrightBig dt, (3.11) for every t∈[a, b], t+dt∈µ(t)∩∗[a, b] Consider a second standard source F2at which electromagnetic reflection oc- curs at t2∈[a, b], t2> t1, t2+dt∈µ(t2)∩∗[a, b].Then (3.11) becomes ∗s(t2+dt)−s(t)∼/parenleftBig ∗v(t2) +/parenleftBig ∗/integraltextt2 t1∗v(x)/xdx/parenrightBig/parenrightBig dt. (3.12) Our final assumption for monadic cluster behavior is that the classical ballistic property holds with respect to electromagnetic propagatio n. (v) From the exterior NSP-world viewpoint ,at any standard time t∈[a, b],the velocity∗v(t) partakes of the relative velocity of the source. Applying the classical statement (v) with the indistinguis hable concept would mean that the distance traveled∗s(t2+dt)−s(t2) is indistinguishable from (∗v(t2)+ w)dt.Hence , (∗v(t2) +w)dt∼∗s(t2+dt)−s(t2)∼/parenleftbigg ∗v(t2) +/parenleftbigg ∗/integraldisplayt2 t1∗v(x) xdx/parenrightbigg/parenrightbigg dt.(3.13) 9Expression (3.13) implies that ∗v(t2) +w≈∗v(t2) +/parenleftbigg ∗/integraldisplayt2 t1∗v(x) xdx/parenrightbigg . (3.14) Sincest(w) is a standard number ,(3.14) becomes after taking the standard part operator , st(w) =st/parenleftbigg ∗/integraldisplayt2 t1∗v(x) xdx/parenrightbigg . (3.15) After reflection ,a NSEM field disturbance returns to the first source F1arriving att3∈[a, b], t1< t2< t3.Notice that the function sdoes not appear in equation (3.15). Using the nonfavored source concept ,a reciprocal argument entails that s1(t) t=st/parenleftbigg ∗/integraldisplayt3 t2∗v1(x) xdx/parenrightbigg , (3.16) st(w) =st/parenleftbigg ∗/integraldisplayt3 t2∗v1(x) xdx/parenrightbigg , (3.17) where it is not assumed that the function∗v1=∗v. We now combine (3.10) ,(3.15) ,(3.16) ,(3.17) and obtain an interesting non- monadic view of the relationship between distance traveled by an NSEM field dis- turbance and relative velocity. s1(t3)−s(t2) =st(w)(t3−t2). (3.18) Although reflection has been used to determine relation (3.1 8) and a linear-like interpretation involving reflection seems difficult to expre ss,there is a simple non- reflection analogue model for this behavior. Suppose that an NSEM field disturbance is transmitted from a s ource F1,to a position F2.LetF1andF2have no NSP-world relative motion. Suppose that a NSEM field disturbance is transmitted from F1toF2with a constant velocity vwith the duration of the transmission t′′−t′,where the path of motion is considered as linear. The disturbance continues linearly after it passes point F2but has increased during its travel through the monadic cluster at F2to the velocity v+st(w).The disturbance then travels linearly for the same duration t′′−t′.The linear difference in the two distances traveled is w(t′′−t′).This in the NSP-world is to be construed only as an analogue model and is not what has occurred. Equations (3.10) and (3.15) show that in the NSP-world NSEM fi eld distur- bances do not propagate linearly. Except for the effects of ma terial objects ,it is assumed that in the N-world the path of motion displayed by a N SEM field dis- turbance is linear. This includes the path of motion within a n N-world light-clock. We continue this derivation based upon what ,at present ,appears to be additional 10parameters ,a private NSP-world time and a NSP-world rule. Of course ,the idea of the N-world light-clock is being used as a fixed means of ident ifying the different ef- fects the NSEM field is having upon these two distinct worlds. A question yet to be answered is how can we compensate for differences in these two time measurements , the NSP-world private time measurement of which we can have n o knowledge and N-world light-clocks. The weighted mean value theorem for integrals in nonstandar d form ,when applied to equations (3.15) and (3.17) ,states that there are two NSP-world times ta, tb∈∗[a, b] such that t1≤ta≤t2≤tb≤t3and st(w) =st(∗v(ta))/integraldisplayt2 t11 xdx=st(∗v1(tb))/integraldisplayt3 t21 xdx. (3.19) [See note 1 part c.] Now suppose that within the local N-world any to-and-fro light-clock styled measurement for the velocity of light us ing a fixed instrumenta- tion yields equal quantities. Model this by (*) st(∗v(ta)) =st(∗v1(tb)) =c.I point out that there are many nonconstant *-continuous func tions that satisfy prop- erty (*). For example ,certain standard nonconstant linear functions and nonline ar modifications of them. Property (*) yields /integraldisplayt2 t11 xdx=/integraldisplayt3 t21 xdx. (3.20) And solving (3.20) yields ln/parenleftbiggt2 t1/parenrightbigg = ln/parenleftbiggt3 t2/parenrightbigg . (3.21) From this one has st(w) =cln/parenleftbiggt2 t1/parenrightbigg =cln/parenleftbiggt3 t2/parenrightbigg . (3.22) Expression (3.22) is Prokhovnik’s equation (6.3.2) in refe rence [7] and leads immediately to t2=√t1t3which is equation (6.3.3) in reference [7]. However ,the interpretation of this result and the others that follow can not,for the NSP-world , be those as proposed by Prokhovnik. The times t1, t2, t3,are standard substratum times. Further ,it is not logically acceptable when considering how to measu re such time in the NSP-world or N-world to consider just any mod e of measurement. The mode of light speed measurement must be carried out withi n the confines of the language used to obtain this derivation. Using this lang uage,a method for time calculation that is permissible in the N-world is the li ght-clock method. Any other described method for time calculation should not incl ude significant terms from other sources. Time as expressed in this derivation is n ot a mystical universal something or other. It is a measured quantity based entirely upon some mode of measurement. 11They are two major difficulties with most derivations for expr essions used in the Special Theory. One is the above mentioned universal tim e concept. The other is the ad hoc nonderived N-world relative velocity. In this c ase,no consideration is given as to how such a relative velocity is to be measured so th at from both F1and F2the same result would be obtained. It is possible to achieve s uch a measurement method because of the logical existence of the NSEM field. All of the “times” that we have encountered are durations. Th ey are not the numerical numbers at which a clock hand might point or the dig its on a digital watch. We can use linearly orientated light-clocks and a cou nter that indicates , from some starting count ,the number of times the light impulse has traversed back and forth between the mirror and source of our light-clock. S ince we are dealing with relative velocities ,our conclusions should be the same if we consider F1as fixed within the NSEM field and suppose that F1andF2can coincide. When they do coincide ,theF2light-clock counter number that appears conceptionally fir st after that moment can be considered to coincide with the counter nu mber for the F1 light-clock. After F2is perceived to no longer coincide with F1,a light impulse is trans- mitted from F1towards F2in an assumed linear manner. The “next” F1counter number after this event is τ11.We do not assume that the relative velocity of F2 with respect to F1has altered the light-clock counters for the length Lused to define a light-clock is measured by the NSP-world ruler and c,as produced by the standard part operator ,is not altered by N-world relative velocity. Further ,the N-world light-clocks are only to be observed at the two posit ionsF1, F2.Further , this light impulse is represented by a NSEM field disturbance . The light impulse is reflected back to F1by a mirror similar to the light-clock itself. The first count er number on the F2light-clock to appear ,intuitively ,“after” this reflection is τ21. TheF1counter number first perceived after the arrival of the retur ning light pulse isτ31. The NSEM field disturbance is assumed for the N-world to be an i ndepen- dent agent and is not influenced by the N-world relative veloc ity. From this linear viewpoint ,at the moment of reflection ,denoted by τ21,the impulse has traveled an operational linear light-clock distance of ( τ21−τ11)L.After reflection ,under our assumptions and nonfavored source concept ,a NSEM field disturbance would trace out the same operational linear light-clock distance measu red by ( τ31−τ21)L.Thus the operational light-clock distance from F1toF2would be at the moment of oper- ational reflection ,under our linear assumptions ,1/2 the sum of these two distances orS1= (1/2)(τ31−τ11)L.Now we can also determine the appropriate operational relation between these light-clock counter numbers for S1= (τ21−τ11)L.Hence , τ31= 2τ21−τ11. After,measured by light-clock counts ,the impulse has been received back to F1, a second light impulse (denoted by a second subscript of 2) is immediately sent to F2. Although τ31≤τ12,it can be assumed for comprehension that τ31=τ12.The same analysis with new light-clock count numbers yields a differe nt operational distance 12S2= (1/2)(τ32−τ12)Landτ32= 2τ22−τ12.One can determine the operational light-clock time intervals by considering τ22−τ21= (1/2)((τ32−τ31) + (τ12−τ11)) and the operational linear light-clock distance difference S2−S1= (1/2)((τ32− τ31)−(τ12−τ11))L.Since we can only actually measure numerical quantities as discrete or terminating numbers ,it would be empirically sound to write the N- world time intervals for these scenarios as t1=τ12−τ11, t3= (τ32−τ31).This yields the operational Einstein measure expressions in (6.3.4) of [7] as τ22−τ21=tEand operational light-length rE=S2−S1,using our specific light-clock approach. This allows us to define ,operationally ,the N-world relative velocity as vE=rE/tE.Since this is an operational definition ,the fact that we do not have knowledge of the actual NSP-world length of the light path over one light-count tick cannot invalidate this method. [In this section ,thet1, t3are not the same Einstein measures ,in form ,as described in [7]. But ,in section 4 ,5,6 these operational measures are used along with infinitesimal light-clock counts to obtain the exact Ei nstein measure forms of the time measure. This is: the t1is a specific starting count and the t3ist1plus an appropriate lapsed time.] Can we theoretically turn the above approximate operationa l approach for discrete N-world light-clock time into a time continuum? Li ght-clocks can be con- sidered from the NSP-world viewpoint. In such a case ,the actual NSP-world length used to form the light-clock might be considered as a nonzero infinitesimal. Thus ,at least,the numbers τ32, τ21, τ31, τ22are infinite hyperreal numbers ,various differ- ences would be finite and ,after taking the standard part operator ,all of the N-world times and lengths such as tE, rE, S1, S2should be exact and not approximate in character. These concepts will be fully analyzed in section 6. Indeed ,as previously indicated ,for all of this to hold the velocity ccannot be measured by any means. As indicated in section 6 ,the actual numerical quantity cas it appears in (3.22) is the standard part of pure NSP-world quantities. Within the N -world ,one obtains an “apparent” constancy for the velocity of light since ,for this derivation ,it must be measured by means of a to-and-fro light-clock styled proc edure with a fixed in- strumentation. The apparent independence of such a measure d velocity from the N-world relative velocity of the standard observer is cause d by the highly nonlinear NSP-world character of electromagnetic propagation. As yet ,we have not discussed relations between N-world light-cloc k measure- ments and N-world physical laws. It should be self-evident t hat the assumed linear- ity of the light paths in the N-world can be modeled by the conc ept of projective geometry. Relative to the paths of motion of a light path in th e NSP-world ,the NSEM field disturbances ,the N-world path behaves as if it were a projection upon a plane. Prokhovnik analyzes such projective behavior and co mes to the conclusions that in two or more dimensions the N-world light paths would f ollow the rules of hyperbolic geometry. As shown by Prokhovnik ,the equations (3.22) and the state- ments establishing the relations between the operational o r exact Einstein measures tE, rEandvElead to the Einstein expression relating the light-clock de termined relative velocities for three linear positions having thre e NSP-world relative and 13uniform velocities w1, w2, w3. On page 78 in [7] ,in terms of light-clock determined Einstein measures and based upon the projection idea ,all of the basic Special Theory coordinate transfor- mation equations are obtain. Thus ,all of the NSP-world times have been removed from the results and even the propagation differences with re spect to light-clock measurements. Just use light-clocks in the N-world to measu re all these quantities in the required manner and the entire Special Theory is forth coming. I mention that it can be shown that wandcmay be measured by probes that are not N-world electromagnetic in character. Thus wneed not be obtained in the same manner as is vEexcept that N-world light-clocks would be used for N-world time measurements. For this reason ,st(w) =ωis not directly related to the so-called textual expansion of the space within our univ erse. 4. The Time Continuum. With respect to models that use the classical continuum appr oach (i.e. variables are assumed to vary over such things as an interval of real num bers) does the mathematics perfectly measure quantities within nature – q uantities that cannot be perfectly measured by a human being? Or is the mathematics only approximate in some sense? Many would believe that if “nature” is no bette r than the human being,then classical mathematics is incorrect as a perfect measur e of natural system behavior. However ,this is often contradicted in the limit. That is when individ uals refine their measurements ,as best as it can done ,at the present epoch ,then the discrete human measurements seem to approach the classical as a limit. Continued exploration of this question is a philosophical problem tha t will not be discussed in this paper ,but it is interesting to model those finite things that can ,apparently ,be accomplished by the human being ,transfer these processes to the NSP-world and see what happens. For what follows ,when the term “finite” (i.e. limited) hyperreal number is used ,since it is usually near to a nonzero real number ,it will usually refer to the ordinary nonstandard notion of finite except tha t the infinitesimals have been removed. This allows for the existence of finite multipl icative inverses. First,suppose that tE=st(tEa), rE=st(rEa), S1=st(S1a), S2=st(S2a) and each is a nonnegative real number. Thus tEa, rEa, S1a, S2aare all nonnegative finite hyperreal numbers. Let L= 1/ǫ >0, ǫ∈IN+ ∞.By transfer and the result that S1a, S2a,are considered finite (i.e. near standard) ,thenS1a≈(1/2)L(τ31−τ11)≈ L(τ21−τ11)⇒(1/2)(τ31−τ11),(τ21−τ11) cannot be finite. Thus ,by Theorem 11.1.1 [9] ,it can be assumed that there exist η, ξ∈IN+ ∞such that (1 /2)(τ31−τ11) = η,(τ21−τ11) =ξ.This implies that each τcorresponds to an infinite light-clock count and that τ31= 2η+τ11, τ21=ξ+τ11. (4.1) In like manner ,it follows that τ32= 2λ+τ12, τ22=δ+τ12, λ, δ∈IN+ ∞. (4.2) 14Observe that the second of the double subscripts being 2 indi cates the light-clock counts for the second light transmission. Now for tEato be finite requires that the corresponding nonnegative t1a, t3a be finite. Consider, c,the speed of “light” as expressed in a set of laboratory standard units of measure. Then there is a unique p∈IN∞such that st(2Lp) =c. Letu= 1/(2p).Thenst(2up) = 1 .Non-zero infinitesimal 2 L[resp. 2 u] can be considered as an infinitesimal length [resp. time] unit of me asure based upon c and the same infinitesimal light-clock can be used to measure both standard length and time as measured by the light-clock count m. If, as some have purposed, c varies, then this would correspond to a varying uand not a varying L.Applications of infinitesimals as an approximating device, allow the meas ures 2 L,2u,in most cases, to remain fixed in the sense that they are not altered du e to any real physical process. It is the counts mthat may be altered by a physical process. By transfer of the case where these are real number counts ,this yields that t3a≈u(τ32−τ31) = 2u(λ−η) +u(τ12−τ11)≈2u(λ−η) +t1aandtEa≈u(τ22−τ21)≈u(δ−ξ) +t1a. Hence for all of this to hold in the NSP-world u(δ−ξ) must be finite or that there exists some r∈IR+such that u(δ−ξ)∈µ(r).Letτ12=α, τ11=β.Then tEa≈u(δ−ξ) +u(α−β) implies that u(α−β) is also finite. The requirement that these infinite numbers exist in such a ma nner that the standard part of their products with L[resp. u] exists and satisfies the continuum requirements of classical mathematics is satisfied by Theor em 11.1.1 [9] ,where in that theorem ω= 1/L[resp. 1 /u]. [See note 2.] It is obvious that the nonnegative numbers needed to satisfy this theorem are nonnegative infin ite numbers since the results are to be nonnegative and finite. Theorem 11.1.1 [9] a llows for the appro- priate λ, η, δ, ξ to satisfy a bounding property in that we know two such number s exist such that λ, η < 1/L2, δ, ξ < 1/u2.[Note: It is important to realize that due to this correspondence to a continuum of real numbers that th e entire analysis as it appears in section 3 is now consistent with a mode of measurem ent. Also the time concept is replaced in this analysis with a “count” concept. This count concept will be interpreted in section 8 as a count per some unit of time mea sure.] Also note that the concepts are somewhat simplified if it is as sumed that τ12= τ31.In this case ,substitution into 4.1 yields that t1a≈u(2η).Consequently , tEa= (1/2)(t1a+t3a)≈uλ.This predicts what is to be expected ,that in this case ,the value of tEfrom the NSP-world viewpoint is not related to the first “sync hronizing” light pulse sent. 5. Standard Light-clocks and c. I mention that the use of subparticles or the concept of the NS EM field is not necessary for the derivation in section 3 to hold. One can substitute for the NSEM field the term “substratum” or the like and for the term “m onadic cluster” of possible subparticles just the concept of a “monadic neig hborhood.” It is not necessary that one assume that the substratum is composed of subparticles or any 15identifiable entity ,only that substratum transmission of such radiation behave s in the simplistic manner stated. It is illustrative to show by a diagram of simple light-clock counts how this analysis actually demonstrates the two different modes of pr opagation ,the very simple mode within the NSP-world and the different mode when v iewed from the N-world. In general , Lis always fixed and for the following analysis and ,for this particular scenario , cdoes not change. This process of using N-world light-clocks to approximate the relative velocity should only be done once d ue to the necessity of “indexing” the light-clocks when F1andF2coincide. In the following diagram ,the numbers represent actual light-clock count numbers as perc eived in the N-world. The first column are those recorded at F1,the second column those required at F2. The arrows and the numbers above them represent our F1comprehension of what happens when the transmission is considered to take place in the N-world. Further , F1is assumed to be stationary in the substratum for this analys is and the paths of motion of the light in F1s light-clock is assumed to be possibly different from the N-world linear path. Also the Einstein measures are only for theF1position. F1 N−world F2 τ11= 20 20 ց τ= 40 τ21= 40 20 ւ τ31= 60 τ12= 80 30 ց τ22= 110 30 ւ τ32= 140 Certainly ,the above diagram satisfies the required light-clock count e quations. The only light-clock counts that actually are perceivable a re those at F1.And,for the transformation equations ,the scenario is altered. When the Special Theory transformation formulas are obtained [7, p. 78] ,two distinct N-world observers are used and a third N-world distinct fundamental position. All light-clock counts made at each of these three positions are entered into the appropr iate expressions for the Einstein measures as obtained for each individual position. 6. Infinitesimal Light-clock Analysis. In the originally presented Einstein derivation ,time and length are taken as absolute (i.e. universal) time and length. It was previousl y pointed out that these 16assumptions are logically in error. The scientific communit y extrapolated the lan- guage used in the derivation ,a language stated only in terms of light propagation behavior ,without logical reason to the “concept” of Newtonian absolu te time and length. Can the actual meaning of the “time” and “length” exp ressed in the Lorentz transformations be determined? In what follows ,the infinite light-clock count approach is used to analyze th e classical transformations as presented in [7]. The supersc ripts indicate the counts associated with the light-clocks ,the Einstein measures ,and the like ,at the positions F1, F2.The 1 being the light-clock measures at F1for the event on P,the 2 for the light-clock measures at the F2for the event on P,and the 3 for the light- clock measures and its corresponding Einstein measures at F1for the velocity of F2 relative to F1.The NSP-world measured angle ,assuming linear projection due to the constancy of the velocities ,fromF1to the event on Pisθ,and that from F2to Pisφ. The expressions for our proposes are x(1) E=v(1) Et(1) Ecosθ, x(2) E=v(2) Et(2) Ecosφ. In all that follows , ivaries from 1 to 3. We investigate what happens when the standard model is now embedded back again into the finite NSP-world. All of the “coordinate” transformation equations are re-establi shed using the method of Prokhovnik [7] which actually only involves the pure number sωi/c.These trans- formations are interpreted in the NSP-world. But as far as th e light-clock counts are concerned ,their appropriate differences are only infinitely near to a st andard number. The appropriate expressions are altered to take thi s into account. For sim- plicity in notation ,it is again assumed that “immediate” in the light-clock coun t process means τ(i) 12=τ(i) 31.[See note 3.] Consequently , t(i) 1a≈2uη(i).Then t(i) Ea≈uλ(i). (6.1) Now from our definition r(i) E≈L(λ(i)−η(i)).Hence since all of the numbers involved are nonnegative and finite ,andst(v(i) Ea)st(t(i) Ea) =st(r(i) Ea) it follows that v(i) Ea≈L(λ(i)−η(i)) uλ(i). (6.2) Now consider a set of two 4-tuples (st(x(1) Ea),st(y(1) Ea),st(z(1) Ea),st(t(1 Ea)), (st(x(2) Ea),st(y(2) Ea),st(z(2) Ea),st(t(2) Ea)), where they are viewed as Cartesian coordinates in the NSP-wo rld. First ,we have st(x(1) Ea) =st(v(1) Ea)st((t(1) Ea)st(∗cosθ),st(x(2) Ea) =st(v(2) Ea)st(t(2) Ea)st(∗cosφ).Now suppose the local constancy of c. The N-world Lorentz transformation expressions are st(t(1) Ea) =β3(st(t(2) Ea) +st(v(3) Ea)st(x(2) Ea)/c2), 17st(x(1) Ea) =β3(st(x(2) Ea) +st(v(3) Ea)st(t(2) Ea)), where β3=st((1−(v(3) Ea)2/c2)−1/2).Since L(λ(i)−η(i))≈cu(λ(i)−η(i)),the finite character of L(λ(i)−η(i)), u(λ(i)−η(i)) yields that c=st(L/u).When transferred to the NSP-world with light-clock counts ,substitution yields t(1) Ea≈uλ(1)≈β[uλ(2)+uλ(2)K(3)K(2)∗cosφ], (6.3) where K(i)= (λ(i)−η(i))/λ(i), β= (1−(K(3))2)−1/2. For the “distance” transformations ,we have x(1) Ea≈L(λ(1)−η(1))∗cosθ≈ β(L(λ(2)−η(2))∗cosφ+L(λ(3)−η(3)) uλ(3)uλ(2)). (6.4) Assume in the NSP-world that θ≈π/2, φ≈π.Consequently ,substituting into 6.4 yields L(λ(2)−η(2))≈L(λ(3)−η(3)) uλ(3)uλ(2). (6.5) Applying the finite property for these numbers ,yields L(λ(3)−η(3)) uλ(3)≈L(λ(2−η(2)) uλ(2)⇒v(3) Ea≈v(2) Ea. (6.6) Hence ,st(v(3) Ea) =st(v(2) Ea).This predicts that ,in the N-world ,the light-clock deter- mined relative velocity of F2as measured from the F1andF1as measured from the F2positions would be the same if these special infinitesimal li ght-clocks are used. If noninfinitesimal N-world light-clocks are used ,then the values will be approximately the same and equal in the limit. Expression 6.4 relates the light-clock counts relative to t he mea- sure of the to-and-fro paths of light transmission. By not su bstitut- ing for x(2) Eait is easily seen that x(2) Ea≈LG, where Gis an ex- pression written entirely in terms of various light-clock c ount numbers. This implies that the so-called 4-tuples ( st(x(1) Ea),st(y(1) Ea),st(z(1) Ea),st(t(1 Ea)), (st(x(2) Ea),st(y(2) Ea),st(z(2) Ea),st(t(2) Ea)) are not the absolute Cartesian type coordi- nates determined by Euclidean geometry and used to model Gal ilean dynamics. These coordinates are dynamically determined by the behavi or of electromagnetic radiation within the N-world. Indeed ,in [7],the analysis within the substratum (outside of the monadic clusters) that leads to Prokhovnik’ s conclusions is only relative to electromagnetic propagation and is done by pure number Galilean dy- namics. Recall that the monadic cluster analysis is also don e by Galilean dynamics. In general ,when it is claimed that “length contracts” with respect to re lative velocity the “proof” is stated as follows: x′=st(β)(x+vt);x′=st(β)(x+vt).Then 18these two expressions are subtracted. Supposedly ,this yields x′−x′=st(β)(x−x) since its assumed that vt=vt.A more complete expression would be x(1) E−x(1) E=st(β)((x(2) E−x(2) E) + (v(3) Et(2) E−v(3) Et(2) E)). (6.7) In this particular analysis ,it has been assumed that all NSP-world relative velocities ωi,ωi≥0.To obtain the classical length contraction expression ,letωi= ωi, i= 1,2,3.Now this implies that θ=θ,φ=φas they appear in the velocity figure 6.1 [7, p. 113] and that x(1) E−x(1) E=st(β)(x(2) E−x(2) E). (6.8) The difficulty with this expression has been its interpretati on. Many modern treatments of Special Relativity [6] argue that (6.8) has no physical meaning. But in these arguments it is assumed that x(1) E−x(1) Emeans “length” in the Cartesian coordinate sense as related to Galilean dynamics. As pointe d out,such a physical meaning is not the case. Expression (6.8) is a relationship b etween light-clock counts and,in general ,displays properties of electromagnetic propagation withi n the N- world. Is there a difference between the right and left hand si des of 6.8 when viewed entirely from the NSP-world. First ,express 6.8 as x(1) E−x(1) E=st(β)x(2) E−st(β)x(2) E. In terms of light-clock counts ,this expression becomes L(λ(1)∗cosθ−η(1)∗cosθ)−L(λ(1)∗cosθ−η(1)∗cosθ)≈ (6.9) L(λ(2)β|∗cosφ|−βη(2)β|∗cosφ|)−L(λ(2)β|∗cosφ|−η(2)β|∗cosφ|), where finite β= (1−(K(3))2)−1/2and|·|is used so that the Einstein velocities are not directed numbers and the Einstein distances are compara ble. Also as long as θ, φsatisfy the velocity figure 6.1 ,(6.9) is independent of the specific angles chosen in the N-world since in the N-world expression (6.8) no angle s appear relating the relative velocities. That is the velocities are not vector q uantities in the N-world , but scalars. Assuming the nontrivial case that θ/ne}ationslash≈π/2, φ/ne}ationslash≈π,we have from Theorem 11.1.1 that there exist Λ(i),N(i),Λ(i), N(i)∈IN∞, i= 1,2 such that∗cosθ≈ Λ(1)/λ(1)≈N(1)/η(1)≈Λ(1)/λ(1)≈N(1)/η(1), β|∗cosφ|≈Λ(2)/λ(2)≈N(2)/η(2) ≈Λ(2)/λ(2)≈N(1)/η(2).Consequently ,using the finite character of these quotients and the finite character of L(λ(i)), L(η(i)), L(λ(i)), L(η(i)), i= 1,2,the general three body NSP-world view 6.9 is L(Λ(1)−N(1))−L(Λ(1)−N(1)) =Lξ(1)≈ Lξ(2) 1=L(Λ(2)−N(2))−L(Λ(2)−N(2)). (6.10) 19The obvious interpretation of 6.10 from the simple NSP-worl d light propagation viewpoint is displayed by taking the standard part of expres sion 6.10. st(L(Λ(1)−N(1)))−st(L(Λ(1)−N(1))) =st(Lξ(1)) = st(Lξ(2) 1) =st(L(Λ(1)−N(1)))−st(L(Λ(1)−N(1))). (6.11) This is the general view as to the equality of the standard NSP -world distance traveled by a light impulse moving to-and-fro within a light -clock as light is used to measure the occurrence of an event at PfromF1andF2as viewed from the substratum only. In order to interpret 6.9 for the N-world an d a single NSP-world relative velocity ,you consider additionally that ω1=ω2=ω3.Hence , θ=π/3 and correspondingly φ= 2π/3.In this case ,we cannot substitute for β.Since cosπ/3,cos 2π/3 are nonzero and finite ,6.9 now yields st(L(λ(1)−η(1)))−st(L(λ(1)−η(1))) = st(β)(st(L(λ(2) 1−η(2) 1))−st(L(λ(2) 1−η(2) 1)))⇒ (st(Lλ(1))−st(Lη(1)))−(st(Lλ(1))−st(Lη(1))) = st(β)((st(Lλ(2) 1)−st(Lη(2) 1))−(st(Lλ(2) 1)−st(Lη(2) 1))). (6.12) Or st(L(λ(1)−η(1))−L(λ(1)−η(1))) = st(L[(λ(1)−η(1))−(λ(1)−η(1))]) = st(LΠ(1)) =st(β)st(LΠ(2) 1) =st(LβΠ(2) 1) = (6 .13) st(L[(λ(1)−η(1))−(λ(1)−η(1))]) = st(Lβ[(λ(2) 1−η(2) 1)−(λ(2) 1−η(2) 1)]). In order to obtain the so-called “time dilation” expression s,follow the same proce- dure as above. Notice ,however ,that when you assume only that ωi=ωi, i= 1,2,3, this yields u(λ(1)−λ(1))≈βu(λ(2)−λ(2)). (6.14) It is interesting ,but not surprising ,that 6.14 is not dependent upon the requirement thatω1=ω2=ω3nor upon the specific θorφchosen since the light-clock counts are the fundamental constitutes for the analysis. In the NSP -world ,as previously done,6.14 can be re-expressed as u(λ(1)−λ(1))≈u(λ(2) 2−λ(2) 2). (6.15) 20Or st(u(λ(1)−λ(1))) =st(uΠ(1) 2) = st(uΠ(2) 3) =st(u(λ(2) 2−λ(2) 2)). (6.16) [See note 4.] From the N-world ,the expression becomes ,taking the standard part operator , st(uλ(1))−st(uλ(1)) = st(β)(st(uλ(2))−st(uλ(2))). (6.17) Or st(uΠ(1) 2) =st(β)st(uΠ(2) 4) =st(uβΠ(2) 4) = st(u(λ(1)−λ(1))) =st(u[β(λ(2)−λ(2))]). (6.18) Note that using the standard part operator in the above expre ssions ,yields contin- uum time and space coordinates to which the calculus can now b e applied. However , the time and space measurements are not to be made with respec t to a universal clock or ruler. The measurements are relative to electromag netic propagation. The Einstein time and length are not the substratum time and leng th,but rather they are concepts that incorporate a mode of measurement into ele ctromagnetic field theory. It is this necessary incorporation that helps clari fy properties of the NSEM field. Expressions such as (6.13) ,(6.18) will be interpreted in the next sections of this paper. 7. An Interpretation. In each of the expressions (6 .i), i= 10, . . .,18 the infinitesimal numbers L, u are not altered. Consequently the only alteration that take s place in N-world expres- sions (6 .i), i= 12,13,17,18 is in the light-clock counts. This is exactly what (6.13) and (6.18) state. Although these are external expressions a nd cannot be “formally” transferred back to the N-world ,the methods of infinitesimal modeling require the concepts of “constant” and “not constant” to be preserved. N ow these N-world expressions can be re-described in terms of N-world approxi mations. Simply substi- tute.= for = ,a nonzero real d[resp. µ] forL[resp. u] and real natural numbers for each light-clock count in equations (6 .i),i= 12,17.Then for a particular d[resp. µ] any change in the light-clock measured relative velocity vEwould dictate a change in the the light-clock counts and not a change in d[resp. µ]. Keeping the same vE,then,as you reduce d[resp. µ],the light-clock counts would increase in such a manner that.=→=.Hence ,the N-world need not be concerned with the idea that “length” contracts or time “dilates” for neither concept is being displayed by the light-clock expressions. But,in many cases ,the use of light-clocks is not intended to be a literal use of such instruments. For certain scenarios ,light-clocks are to be considered as analog models that incorporate electromagnetic wave and energy properties. 21The light-clock analysis given in the section 3 is done to dis cover a general property for the transmission of electromagnetic radiatio n. It is clear that property (*) does not require that the measured velocity of light be a u niversal constant. All that is needed is that for the two NSP-world times ta, tbthatst(ℓ(ta)) = st(ℓ1(tb)).This means that all that is required for the most basic aspect s of the Special Theory to hold is that at two NSP-world times in the to -and-fro reflection processst(ℓ(ta)) =st(ℓ1(tb)), taa time during the transmission prior to reflection andtbafter reflection. If ℓ, ℓ1are actually extended standard functions v, v1 continuous on [ a, b],then given any ǫ∈IR+there is a δsuch that for each t, t′∈[a, b] such that|t−t′|< δit follows that|v(t)−v(t′)|< ǫ/3 and|v1(t)−v1(t′)|< ǫ/3. Letting t3−t1< δ,then|ta−tb|< δ.Since∗v(ta) =ℓ(ta)≈∗v1(tb) =ℓ1(tb), *-transfer implies |∗v(t2)−∗v1(t2)|< ǫ.[ See note 5.] Since t2is a standard number ,|v(t2)−v1(t2)|< ǫimplies that v(t2) =v1(t2).Hence ,in this case ,the two functions ℓ, ℓ1do not differentiate between the velocity catt2.Butt2can be considered an arbitrary cosmic (i.e. substratum) time >0.This does not require cto be the same for all cosmic times only that v(t) =v1(t). The restriction that ℓ, ℓ1are extended standard functions appears necessary for our derivation. Also,this analysis is not related to what ℓmay be for a stationary laboratory. In the case of stationary F1, F2,then the integrals are zero in equation (19) of section 3. The easiest thing to do is to simply postula te thatst(∗v(ta)) is a universal constant. This does not make such an assumption c orrect. One of the properties that will allow the Einstein velocity t ransformation ex- pression to be derived is the equilinear property. This property is weaker than thec= constant property for light propagation. Suppose that you have within the NSP-world three observers F1, F2, F3that are linearly related. Further , suppose that w1is the NSP-world velocity of F2relative to F1andw2is the NSP- world velocity of F3relative to F2.It is assumed that for this nonmonadic cluster situation ,that Galilean dynamics also apply and that st(w1) +st(w2) =st(w3). Using the description for light propagation as given in sect ion 3,lett1be the cosmic time when a light impulse leaves F1, t2when it “passes” F2,andt3the cosmic time when it arrives at F3. From equation (3.15) ,it follows that st(w1) =st(∗v1(t1a))st/parenleftbigg ∗/integraldisplayt2 t11 xdx/parenrightbigg + [st(w2) =]st(∗v2(t2a))st/parenleftbigg ∗/integraldisplayt3 t21 xdx/parenrightbigg = st(w3) =st(∗v3(t3a))st/parenleftbigg ∗/integraldisplayt3 t11 xdx/parenrightbigg . (7.1) Ifst(∗v1(t1a)) =st(∗v2(t2a)) =st(∗v3(t3a)),then we say that the velocity functions∗v1,∗v2,∗v3areequilinear. The constancy of cimplies equilinear ,but 22not conversely. In either case ,functions such as∗v1and∗v2need not be the same within a stationary laboratory after interaction. Since experimentation indicates that electromagnetic pro pagation does not be- have in the N-world in the exact same manner as does sound or ot her types of wave phenomena ,it should be obvious that there are additional electromagne tic factors being displayed when relative velocity is involved . The light-clock analysis is consistent with the following speculation. Depending upon the scenario ,the uniform velocity an observer has with respect to the substra tum directly alters electromagnetic behavior. This is termed an electro magnetic interaction withthesubstratum (emis). It is possible that this (emis) is mediated by the postulated ZPF. Recall that a “light-clock” can be considered as an analog model for the most basic of the electromagnetic p roperties. On the other hand ,only those experimental methods that replicate or are equiv alent to the methods of Einstein measure would be relative to the Spec ial Theory. This is one of the basic logical errors in theory application. The ex perimental language must be related to the language of the derivation. The concep t of the light-clock , linear paths and the like are all intended to imply electroma gnetic interactions. Any explanation for experimentally verified Special Theory effects should be stated in such a language and none other. I also point out that there a re no paradoxes in this derivation for you cannot simply “change your mind” w ith respect to the substratum. For example ,an observer is either in motion or not in motion ,and not bothwith respect to the substratum. 8. A Speculation and Ambiguous Interpretations Suppose that the correct principles of infinitesimal modeli ng were known prior to the M-M (i.e. Michelson-Morley) experiment. Scientists would know that the (mathematical) substratum is not an N-world entity. They wo uld know that they could have very little knowledge as to the refined workings of this NSP-world sub- stratum since≈is not an = .They would have been forced to accept the statement of Max Planck that “Nature does not allow herself to be exhaus tively expressed in human thought.”[ The Mechanics of Deformable Bodies ,Vol. II ,Introduction to Theoretical Physics ,Macmillian ,N.Y. (1932) ,p. 2.] Further suppose ,that human comprehension was advanced enough so that all scientific experimentation always included a theory of meas urement. The M-M experiment would then have been performed to learn ,if possible ,more about this NSP-world substratum. When a null finding was obtained then a derivation such as that in section 3 might have been forthcoming. Then the follo wing two expressions would have emerged from the derivation. Letsdenote “stationary” or “standard” or ,sometimes ,“observer” (i.e. F1) andm“relative motion with respect to stationary ,standard ,or observer” (i.e. F2.) (This can be restated in terms of two NSP-world absolute moti ons if necessary.) A specific interpretation of st(β)−1(x(s) E−x(s) E) =x(m) E−x(m) E (8.1) 23and the corresponding st(β)−1(t(s) E−t(s) E) =t(m) E−t(m) E (8.2) is necessary. If,in (8.1) ,x(s) E−x(s) E=Usis interpreted as any standard unit of length measure in a stationary system and x(m) E−x(m) E) =Umthe same “standard” unit of length measure in a system moving with respect to the subst ratum (without regard to direction) ,then for equality to take place the unit of measure Us“must” contract in the moving system. Of course ,it would have been immediately realized that the error in this last statement is that Usis “any” unit of measure. The same statement might be claimed for t(m) E−t(m) Eandt(s) E−t(s) E.Once again ,the error in these two statements is the term “any.” Expressions (8.1) (8.2) only refer to an experiment that is e quivalent entirely to the light-clock count process AND to the method used to obtai n Einstein measures. Such experiments are the to-and-fro linear light-path scenarios of M-M ,Kennedy- Thorndike and many others. Moreover ,when viewed from the wave state ,the interferometer measurement technique is determined compl etely by a light-clock type process – the number of light waves in the linear path. We need to use Lm sc, a scenario associated light unit ,forUmand use a Ls scforUs.It appears for this particular scenario ,thatLs scmay be considered the private unit of length in the NSP-world used to measure NSP-world light-path length. The “wavelength” λof any light source must also be measured in the same light units . Let λ=NsLs sc. Taking into consideration a unit conversion factor between the unknown NSP-world private units with standard part k,the number of light waves in the stationary laboratory would be kAsLs sc/kNsLs sc=As/Ns,where Asis a pure number such thatAsLs scis the “length” using the units in the stationary system. In t he moving system ,assuming that this simple aspect of light propagation holds in the NSP- world and the N-world which we did to obtain the derivation in section 3 ,it is claimed that substitution yields kAsst(β)−1Ls sc/kNsst(β)−1Ls sc=As/Ns.Thus there would be no difference in the number of light waves in any case where the experimental set up involved the sum of light paths each of wh ich corresponds to the to-and-fro process [1, p. 24]. Further ,the same conclusions would be reached using (8.2). I point out that the derivation that appears in sectio n 3,is not relevant to a Sagnac type of experiment. However ,this does not mean that a similar derivation involving a polygonal propagation path cannot be obtained. Where is the logical error in the above argument? The error is the object upon which the st(β)−1operates. Specifically (6.13) states that st(β)−1(As)(emis)←→ β−1Π(s)and (8 .3) st(β)−1(Ns)(emis)←→ β−1Π(s) 1. (8.4) 24It is now rather obvious that the two (emis) aspects of the M-M experiment nullify each other. The light-path within the NSP-world is ,in actually ,not linear for a stationary NSP-world object. (This is obvious from the proj ection property.) Due to the (emis) ,the “number” of these units or the path length LΠ(s)is reduced from the NSP-world viewpoint with relative motion w.That is the path length in the N-world is approximately st(β)−1(AskLs sc).Approximately is a necessary concept here since it would only be exact if Ls scis infinitesimal. Since the same alteration takes place with respect to the wavelength (i.e. wavelength increases from the NSP- world viewpoint) ,then the null aspect is obtained even in the approximate mode . Also for no finite wcanβ≈0.There is a great difference between the propagation properties in the NSP-world and the N-world. For example ,the classical Doppler effect is an N-world effect relative to linear propagation. Rather than indicating that the substratum is not present ,the M-M results indicate indirectly that the NSP-world substratum exists. Apparently ,the well-known Ives-Stillwell ,and all similar ,experiments used in an attempt to verify such things as the relativistic redshif t are of such a nature that they eliminate other effects that motion is assumed to ha ve upon the scenario associated electromagnetic propagation. What was shown is that the frequency νof the canal rays vary with respect to a representation for vEmeasured from electromagnetic theory in the form νm=st(β)−1νs.First,we must investigate what the so-called time dilation statement (8.2) means. What it m eans is exemplified by (6.14) and how the human mind comprehends the measure of “tim e.” In the scenario associated (8.2) expression ,for the right and left sides to be comprehensible ,the expression should be conceived of as a measure of the “number of ticks” – a “count.” It is the experience with a specific unit and the number of them that “passes” that yields the intuitive concept of “time.” On the other hand ,for some purposes or as some authors assume ,(8.2) might be viewed as a change in a time unit Ts rather than in the count. Both of these interpretations can b e incorporated into a frequency statement. First ,relative to the frequency of light-clock counts ,for a fixed stationary unit of time Ts,(8.2) reads st(β)−1Cs sc/Ts.=Cm sc/Ts⇒st(β)−1Cs sc.=Cm sc. (8.5) BUT according to (6.18) ,theCs scandCm sccorrespond to the counts – the “ticks” – produced by light-clocks and nothing more than tha t. Indeed ,(8.5) has nothing to do with the concept of “time” only with the usual al teration in counts due to relative motion. That is an alteration due to (emis). I ndeed ,the “length contraction” expression (8.1) and the “time dilation” expr ession (8.2) have nothing to do with either length or time. These two expressions are bo th saying the same thing from two different viewpoints. There is an alteration d ue to the (emis). [Note that the second.= in (8.5) depends upon the Tschosen.] On the other hand ,for a relativistic redshift type experiment ,the usual inter- pretation is that νs.=p/Tsandνm.=p/Tm.This leads to p/Tm.=st(β)−1p/Ts⇒ 25Tm.=st(β)Ts.Assuming that all frequency alterations due to (emis) have b een eliminated then this is interpreted to mean that “time” is sl ower in the moving ex- cited hydrogen atom than in the “stationary” laboratory. Wh en compared to (8.5) , there is the ambiguous interpretation in that the pis considered the same for both sides (i.e. the concept of the frequency is not altered by sub stratum motion). It is consistent with all that has come before that the Ives-Still well result be written as νs.=p/Tsand that νm.=q/Ts.This leads to the expression st(β)−1p.=q[= in the limit] . (8.6) Expression (8.6) does not correspond to a concept of “time” b ut rather to the concept of alterations in emitted frequency due to (emis). I t is,therefore ,correct to state that with this ambiguous interpretation of (8.2) that in an Ives-Stillwell sce- nario the frequency of the light emitted from an atomic unit m oving with velocity ωwith respect to the substratum is altered due to (emis). This (emis) alteration depends upon K(3).It is critical that the two different infinitesimal light-clo ck in- terpretations be understood. One interpretation is relati ve to electromagnetic prop- agation theory. In this case ,the light-clock concept is taken in its most literal form. The second interpretation is relative to light-clock count s as an analogue model. This means that the cause need not be related to propagation b ut is more probably due to how individual constituents interact with the NSEM fie ld. The exact nature of this interaction and a non-ambiguous approach needs furt her investigation based upon constituent models since the analogue model specifical ly denies that there is some type of absolute time dilation but ,rather ,signifies the existences of other possible causes. [In [11] ,theνm=st(β)−1νsis formally and non-ambiguously de- rived from a special (metric) line element ,a universal functional requirement and Schr¨ odinger’s equation.] In our analysis it has been assumed that F1is stationary in the NSP-world substratum. It is clear ,however ,that under our assumption that the scalar velocities in the NSP-world are additive with respect to linear motion ,then if F1has a velocity ωwith respect to the substratum and F2has the velocity ω′,then it follows that the light-clock counts for F1have been altered with respect to a stationary F0due to the (emis) and the light-clock counts for F2have been similarly altered with respect to a stationary F0due to (emis). Consequently ,the light-clock counts expressed by K(3)are the result of the difference ,so to speak ,between these two (emis) influences. Thus the actual numerical quantities inv olved correspond to the standard velocity metric d(ω, ω′).In the case that ω/ne}ationslash= 0,it follows that ω≤ω′for ω=d(0, ω) +d(ω, ω′)≤d(0, ω′) =ω′. As previously stated ,within the NSP-world relative to electromagnetic propa- gation observer scalar velocities are either additive or ar e related by the above met- ric. Within the N-world ,this last statement need not be so. Velocities of individual entities are modeled by either vectors or ,at the least ,by signed numbers. Once the N-world expression is developed ,then it can be modified in accordance with the 26usual (emis) alterations ,in which case the velocity statements are N-world Einstein measures. For example ,deriving the so-called relativistic Dopplertarian effect ,the combination of the classical and the relativistic redshift ,by means of a substratum argument such as appears in [7] where it is assumed that the li ght propagation laws with respect to the photon concept in the NSP-world are the sa me as those in the N-world ,is in logical error. Deriving the classical Doppler effect ex pression then , when physically justified ,making the wave number alteration in accordance with the (emis) would be the correct logic needed to obtain the rel ativistic Dopplertarian effect. [See note 6.] Although I will not ,as yet ,re-interpreted all of the Special Relativity results with respect to this purely electromagnetic interpretatio n,it is interesting to note the following two re-interpretations. The so-called varia tion of “mass” was ,in truth , originally derived for imponderable matter (i.e. elementa ry matter.) This would lead one to believe that the so-called rest mass and its alter ation,if experimentally verified ,is really a manifestation of the electromagnetic nature of s uch elementary matter. Once again the so-called mass alteration can be asso ciated with an (emis) concept. The µ-meson decay rate may also show the same type of alteration as appears to be the case in an Ives-Stillwell experiment. It do es not take a great stretch of the imagination to again attribute the apparent a lteration in this rate to an (emis) process. This would lead to the possibility that su ch decay is controlled by electromagnetic properties. Indeed ,in order to conserve various things , µ-meson decay is said to lead to the generation of the neutrino and ant ineutrino. These “things” behave with respect to velocity and mass as if they a re a photon quanta. They do have ,at least ,one additional property not shared with the photon quanta , spin. One might assume that such “things ,” if they exist ,are electromagnetic in character ,but,due to the spin property ,they interact in a completely different manner with gross matter. This yields additional evidence t hatµ-meson decay has an electromagnetic basis. [After this paper was completed ,a method was discovered that establishes that predicted mass and decay time alterat ions are (emis) effects. The derivations are found in [11], [12].] I note that such things as neutrinos and antineutrinos need n ot exist. Indeed , the nonconservation of certain quantities for such a scenar io leads to the conclusion that subparticles exist within the NSP-world and carry off th e “missing” quanti- ties. Thus the invention of such objects may definitely be con sidered as only a bookkeeping technique. As pointed out ,all such experimental verification of the properly interpre ted transformation equations can be considered as indirect evi dence that the NSP-world substratum exists. But none of these results should be exten ded beyond the ex- perimental scenarios concerned. Furthermore ,I conjecture that no matter how the human mind attempts to explain the (emis) in terms of a human l anguage ,it will always be necessary to postulate some interaction process w ith the substratum with- out being able to specifically describe this interaction in t erms of more fundamental concepts. Finally ,the MA-model specifically states that the Special Theory is a 27local theory and should not be extended beyond a local cosmic time interval [ a, b]. 9. Reciprocal Relations As is common to many mathematical models ,not all relations generated by the mathematics need to correspond to physical reality. This is the modern approach to the length contradiction controversy [6]. Since this is a ma thematical model ,there is a theory of correspondence between the physical language and the mathematical structure. This correspondence should be retained through out any derivation. This is a substratum theory and what is stationary or what is not st ationary with respect to the substratum must be maintained throughout any corresp ondence. This applies to such reciprocal relations as st(β)−1(x(m) E−x(m) E) =x(s) E−x(s) E (9.1) and st(β)−1(t(m) E−t(m) E) =t(s) E−t(s) E (9.2) Statement (8.1) and (9.1) [resp. (8.2) and (9.2)] both hold f rom the substratum viewpoint only when vE= 0 since it is not the question of the N-world viewpoint of relative velocity but rather the viewpoint that F1is fixed and F2is not fixed in the substratum or ω≤ω′.The physical concept of the ( s) and ( m) must be maintained throughout the physical correspondence. Which expression would hold for a particular scenario depends upon laboratory confirmat ion. This is a scenario associated theory. All of the laboratory scenarios discuss ed in this paper have used the (8.1) and (8.2). Other authors ,such as Dingle [1] and Builder [7] ,have simply postulated that (8.1) holds rather than (9.1). I have not tak en this absolute stance in this paper. One of the basic controversies associated with the Special T heory is whether (1.8) or (8.2) [resp. (9.1) or (9.2)] actually have physical meaning. The notion is that either “length” is a fundamental concept and “time” is d efined in terms of it , or “time” is a fundamental concept and length is defined in ter ms of it. Dingle ,Ives, and many others assumed that the fundamental notion is lengt h contraction and not time dilation. The modern approach is the opposite of thi s. Length contraction has no physical meaning ,but time dilation does [6]. We know that universal time is defined in terms of length and velocities. But ,the length or time being considered here is Einstein length or Einstein time. This is never menti oned when this problem is being considered. As discussed at the end of section 3 ,Einstein length is actually defined in terms of infinitesimal light-clock counts or in ter ms of the Einstein ve- locity and Einstein time. The only difference between the infi nitesimal light-clock measures for Einstein length and Einstein time is in the use o f a different NSP-world unit. It will be shown in article 3 ,that for Special Theory effects the fundamental notion is that there is an alteration in the infinitesimal lig ht-clock count numbers for the timing light-clock only. The alteration has a physic al bases and it will cause all of the Special Theory effects. [See note 7.] 28{Remark: Karl Popper notwithstanding ,it is not the sole purpose of mathemat- ical models to predict natural system behavior. The major pu rpose is to maintain logical rigor and ,hopefully ,when applicable to discover new properties for natu- ral systems. I have used in this speculation a correspondenc e theory that takes the stance that any verifiable Special Theory effect is electr omagnetic in charac- ter rather than a problem in measure. However ,whether such effects are simply effects relative to the propagation of electromagnetic info rmation or whether they are effects relative to the constituents involved cannot be d irectly obtain from the Special Theory. All mathematically stated effects involve t he Einstein measure of relative velocity , vE– a propagation related measure. The measure of an effect should also be done in accordance with electromagnetic theo ry. As demonstrated , the Special Theory should not be unnecessarily applied to th e behavior of all na- ture systems since it is related to electromagnetic interac tion; unless ,of course ,all natural systems are electromagnetic in character. Without strong justification ,the assumption that one theory does apply to all scenarios is one of the greatest errors in mathematically modeling. But ,if laboratory experiments verify that alterations are taking place in measured quantities and these variation s are approximately in accordance with the Special Theory ,then this would indicate that either the al- terations are related to electromagnetic propagation prop erties or the constituents have an appropriate electromagnetic character. } NOTES [1] (a) Equation (3.9) is obtained as follows: since t∈[a, b], tfinite and not infinitesimal. Thus division by tpreserves≈.Hence , /bracketleftbigg t/parenleftbigg∗s(t+dt)−s(t) dt/parenrightbigg −s(t)/bracketrightbigg /t2≈ℓ(t) t. (1) Since tis an arbitrary standard number and dtis assume to be an arbitrary and ap- propriate nonzero infinitesimal and the function s(t)/tis differentiable ,the standard part of the left side equals the standard part of the right sid e. Thus d(s(t)/t) dt=v(t) t, (2) for each t∈[a, b].By *-transfer ,equation (3.9) holds for each t∈∗[a, b]. (b) Equation (3.10) is then obtained by use of the *-integral and the funda- mental theorem of integral calculus *-transferred to the NS P-world. It is useful to view the definite integral over a standard interval say [ t1, t] as an operator ,at least , defined on the set C([t1, t],IR) of all continuous real valued functions defined on [t1, t].Thus,in general ,the fundamental theorem of integral calculus can be viewed as the statement that ( f′, f(t)−f(t1))∈/integraltextt t1.Hence∗(f′, f(t)−f(t1))∈∗/integraltextt t1⇒ (∗f′,∗(f(t)−f(t1)))∈∗/integraltextt t1⇒(∗f′, f(t)−f(t1))∈∗/integraltextt t1. 29(c) To obtain the expressions in (3.19) ,consider f(x) = 1/x.Then∗fis limited and S-continuous on∗[a, b].Hence (∗f,lnt2−lnt1)∈∗/integraltextt2 t1.Hencest((∗f,lnt2− lnt1)) = ( f,lnt2−lnt1)∈/integraltextt2 t1. [2] The basic theorem that allows for the entire concept of in finitesimal light- clocks and the analysis that appears in this monograph has no t been stated. The theorem ,without proof ,as it appears in the standard edition of “Ultralogics and More” is as follows: Theorem 11.1.1 Letω∈IN∞.Then for each r∈IRthere exists an x∈{m/ω| (m∈∗Z)∧(|m|< ω2)}such that x≈r(i.e.x∈µ(r).) We let L= 1/ǫwhere ǫis any hyperreal infinite natural number (i.e. ǫ∈IN∞). Hence ,by this theorem ,for any positive real number rthere exists some m∈IN∞ such that st(m/ǫ) =r.I point out that for this nonzero case it is necessary that m∈IN∞for if m∈IN,thenst(m/ǫ) = 0.What has not been shown is that the correction factor ucan also be assumed to be determined by some λ∈IN∞.It is shown in section 6 that c=st(L/u) =st((1/ǫ)(1/u)).Applying theorem 11.1.1 , we know that there exists some λ∈IN∞such that c=st(λ(1/ǫ)).Hence we need simply to let u= 1/λ. [3] At this point and on ,the subscripts on the τhave a different meaning than previously indicated. The subscripts denote process numbe rs while the superscript denotes the position numbers. For example , τ2 12means the light-clock count number when the second light-pulse leaves F2andτ2 31would mean the light-clock count number when the first light-pulse returns to position F2. The additional piece of each subscript denoted by the aon this and the fol- lowing pages indicates ,what I thought was obvious from the lines that follow their introduction ,that these are approximating numbers that are infinitesimal ly near to standard NSP-world number obtained by taking the standard p art. [4] Note that such infinite hyperreal numbers as Π(2) 3(here and elsewhere) denote the difference between two infinitesimal light-clock counts and since we are excluding the finite number infinitesimally near to 0 ,these numbers must be infinite hyperreal. Infinitesimal light-clocks can be assumed to mea sure this number by use of a differential counter. BUT it is always to be conceived of a s an infinitesimal light-clock “interval” (increment ,difference ,etc.) It is important to recall this when the various line elements in the next article are considered . [5] This result is obtained as follows: since ta≤t2≤tb,it follows that|ta−t2|< δ,|tb−t2|< δ.Hence by *-transfer, |∗v(t2)−∗v(ta)|< ǫ/3,|∗v1(tb)−∗v1(t2)|< ǫ/3.Since we assume arbitrary ǫ/3 is a standard positive number ,then∗v(ta) = ℓ(ta)≈∗v1(tb) =ℓ1(tb)⇒|∗v(ta)−∗v1(tb)|< ǫ/3.Hence|∗v(t2)−∗v1(t2)|< ǫ. [6] In this article ,I mention that all previous derivations for the complete Dopplertarian effect (the N-world and the transverse) are in logical error. Although there are various reasons for a redshift not just the Doppler tarian ,the electromag- netic redshift based solely upon properties of the NSEM field can be derived as follows: 30(i) let νsdenote the “standard” laboratory frequency for radiation e mitted from an atomic system. This is usually determined by the obse rver. The NSP-world alteration in emitted frequency at an atomic structure due t o (emis) is β−1νs= νradiation,where β−1=/radicalbig 1−v2 E/c2andvEis the Einstein measure of the relative velocity using light-clocks only. (ii) Assuming that an observer is observing this emitted rad iation in a direct line with the propagation and the atomic structure is receding wi th velocity vfrom the observer ,the wave theory of electromagnetic propagation ,within the N-world ,alters the perceived received frequency. This alteration is νradiation(1/(1+v/c)) =νreceived. Consequently ,this yields the total alteration as β−1νs(1/(1+v/c)) =νreceived.Note thatvis measured in the N-world and can be considered a directed ve locity. If ,due to the fact that we are dealing with electromagnetic radiati on,we can consider v the Einstein measure of linear velocity (i.e. v=vE),then the total Dopplertarian effect can be written as νs/parenleftbigg1−vE/c 1 +vE/c/parenrightbigg1/2 =νreceived. (3) It should always be remembered that there are other reasons ,such as the grav- itational redshift and others yet to be analyzed ,that can mask this total Doppler- tarian redshift. [7] A question that has been asked relative to the new derivat ion that yields all of the results of the special theory is why in the N-world do we have the apparent nonballistic effects associated with electromagnetic radi ation? In the derivation ,the opposite was assumed for the NSP-world monadic clusters. Th e constancy of the measure ,by light-clocks and the like ,of the to-and-fro velocity of electromagnetic radiation was modeled by letting st(ta) =st(tb).As mentioned in the section on the special theory ,the Einstein velocity measure transformation expression c an be obtained prior to embedding the world into a hyperbolic ve locity space. It is obtained by considering three in-line standard positions F1, F2, F3that have the NSP-world velocities w1forF2relative to F1, w2forF3relative to F2and the simple composition w3=w1+w2forF3relative to F1. Then simple substitution in this expression yields v(3) E= (v(1) E+v(2) E)//parenleftBigg 1 +v(1) Ev(2) E c2/parenrightBigg . (4) Note that all velocities are Einstein measures and hence cor respond to infinitesimal light-clock measures. This relation is telling us somethin g about the required be- havior in the N-world of electromagnetic radiation. To see t hat within the N-world we need to assume for electromagnetic radiation effects the n onballistic property , simply let v(2) E=corv(2) E.=c.Then v(3) E=c,or.=c.Of course ,the reason we do not have a contradiction is that we have two distinctly diff erent views of the behavior of electromagnetic radiation ,the NSP-world view and the N-world view. 31Further ,note how ,for consistency ,the velocity of electromagnetic radiation is to be measured. It is measured by the Einstein method ,or equivalent ,relative to a to-and-fro path and measures of “time” and “distance” by mea ns of a (infinitesimal) light-clock counts. I am convinced that the dual character of the special theory d erivation requires individual reflection in order to be understood fully. In the NSP-world ,electromag- netic radiation behaves in one respect ,at least ,like a particle in that it satisfies the ballistic nature of particle motion. The reason that equ ation (3) is derivable is due to the definition of Einstein time. But Einstein time ,as measured by elec- tromagnetic pulses ,models the nonballistic or one and only one wave property in that a wave front does not partake of the velocity of the sourc e.This is the reason why I wrote that a NSEM field disturbance would trace the same operational lin ear light-clock distance. The measuring light-clocks are in the N-world in this case. F1 is modeled as fixed in the substratum and F2has an NSP-world relative velocity. The instant the light-pulse is reflected back to F1it does not ,from the N-world viewpoint ,partake of the N-world relative velocity and therefore trac es out the ex- act same apparent N-world linear path. The position F2acts like a virtual position having no other N-world effect upon the light-pulse accept a r eversal of direction. REFERENCES 1.Dingle ,H.,The Special Theory of Relativity ,Methuen’s Monographs on Physical Subjects ,Methuen & Co. LTD ,London ,1950. 2.Herrmann ,R. A.,Some Applications of Nonstandard Analysis to Undergraduat e Mathematics – Infinitesimal Modeling ,Instructional Development Project ,Mathe- matics Dept. U. S. Naval Academy ,Annapolis ,MD 21402-5002 ,1991. 3.Herrmann ,R. A.,Fractals and ultrasmooth microeffects. J. Math. Physics. , 30(1989) ,805–808. 4.Herrmann ,R. A.,Physics is legislated by a cosmogony. Speculat. Sci. Technol. , 11(1988) ,17–24. 5.Herrmann ,R. A.,Rigorous infinitesimal modelling ,Math. Japonica 26(4)(1981) , 461–465. 6.Lawden ,D. F.,An Introduction to Tensor Calculus ,Relativity and Cosmology , John Wiley & Son ,New York ,1982. 7.Prokhovnik ,S. J.,The Logic of Special Relativity ,Cambridge University Press , Cambridge ,1967. 8.Stroyan ,K. D. and Luxemburg ,W. A. J. 1976. Introduction to the Theory of Infinitesimals ,Academic Press ,New York. 9.Herrmann ,R. A.,Ultralogics and More ,http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/ math.GM/9903081 and math.GM/9903082, 1992. 10.Davis M. ,Applied Nonstandard Analysis ,John Wiley & Sons ,New York ,1977. 3211.Herrmann ,R. A.,Operator equations, separation of variables and relativis tic alterations ,Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. ,18(1995) ,59–62. 12.Herrmann ,R. A.,An operator equation and relativistic alterations in the ti me for radioactive decay ,Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. ,19(1996) ,397–402. {June 15 ,1992; revised July 10 ,1992,May 29 ,1993 and 21 Sept 1993. } 33

arXiv:physics/0005032v1 [physics.acc-ph] 11 May 2000LBL-PUB-45566, May, 2000 Localized Beampipe Heating due to e−Capture and Nuclear Excitation in Heavy Ion Colliders Spencer R. Klein Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720 Abstract At heavy ion colliders, two major sources of beam loss are exp ected to be e+e−production, where the e−is bound to one of the nuclei, and photonuclear excitation and decay via neutron emission. Both processes a lter the ions charged to mass ratio by well defined amounts, creating beams of particles with altered magnetic rigidity. These beams will deposit th eir energy in a localized region of the accelerator, causing localized hea ting, The size of the target region depends on the collider optics. For medium and heavy ions, at design luminosity at the Large Hadron Collider, local heati ng may be more than an order of magnitude higher than expected. This could c ause magnet quenches if the local cooling is inadequate. The altered-ri gidity beams will also produce localized radiation damage. The beams could al so be extracted and used for fixed target experiments. Typeset using REVT EX 1I. INTRODUCTION Ion colliders are expected to lose beam particles via ion-io n collisions. Besides purely hadronic interactions, photonuclear interactions are of c onsiderable interest [1] [2] and many electromagnetic processes have cross sections larger than the hadronic cross section. Two electromagnetic processes are expected to be major sources of beam particle loss: production ofe+e−pairs by the colliding electromagnetic fields, where the ele ctron is produced bound to one of the nuclei, and the excitation of one nucleus by the e lectromagnetic field of the other. In the latter case, the nucleus will be excited to a Gia nt Dipole Resonance (GDR) or higher state. Usually, the GDR decays by emitting one or more neutrons. Both of these interactions alter the mass to charge ratio (ri gidity) of the affected ion. For the heavy ions like gold or lead, the rigidity increases a bout 1% for electron capture, and decreases about 0.5% for neutron loss. For lighter ions, the change is larger. Because these changes are larger than the acceptance of the magnetic optics, these ions are lost from the beam, and eventually strike the beam pipe. The hadronic s howers from these collisions will deposit their energy in the cryogenic magnets around th e beampipe. Averaged over the entire ring, the energy deposition is small. However, becau se of the well defined rigidities, the target area is a small fraction of the ring, and localized heating and radiation damage may be a problem. The altered rigidity beams could also be ext racted from the collider and used as a test beam. Here, we consider these reactions for the Relativistic Heav y Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory [3] and the Large Hadron Col lider (LHC) now under con- struction at CERN [4]. Table I lists energies and luminositi es for the systems considered here. For the LHC, different sources quote somewhat different luminosities. This paper will use the peak (initial) luminosities given in the RHIC co nceptual design report and the ALICE proposal for the LHC. The LHC luminosities are for 125 n sec bunch spacing and col- lisions in 1 experimental hall [4]. If the bunch spacing is de creased to 25 nsec, the luminosity increases by a factor of 5. 2II.E+E−PRODUCTION AND E−CAPTURE The electromagnetic fields of the colliding nuclei may inter act and produce e+e−pairs. The electron can be produced bound to one of the nuclei, reduc ing the net charge by 1; usually the electron is captured by the K-shell. The cross section for pair production and electron capture c an be calculated using a number of techniques. Although some coupled channel calcul ations have found very high cross sections, new all-orders analytic calculations supp ort the results of perturbative cal- culations [5], despite the large coupling constant, Zα∼0.6. For beams of identical nuclei, the cross section for capture to a K-shell by a charge Znucleus is [6] [2] σ(A+A→Ae−+A+e+) =33πZ8α6r2 e 101 e2παZ−1/bracketleftbigg ln (δ(γ2−1) 2)−5 3/bracketrightbigg (1) where α=e2/¯hcis the fine structure constant, rethe classical electron radius, γthe Lorentz boost of a single beam, and δ∼0.681. This is the cross section to excite a specific nucleus; the cross section to excite either nucleus is twice as large. The effect of inclusion of higher shells is to boost this cross section by 20% [6]. With this correction, the cross sections are given in Table I; the cross sections drop dramatically asZdecreases; the energy dependence is moderate. A recent extrapolation from lower energy data [7] found high er cross sections, 94 barns for gold at RHIC and 204 barns for lead at the LHC, twice the per turbative result. If this result is correct, then heating will be twice that predicted . The particle loss rates, the products of these cross section s and the luminosity, are given in Table II. The very strong Zdependence of the cross section is compensated by the rapid luminosity increase as Zdecreases, and the particle losses are largest for medium io ns. Table II also gives the single beam energy losses, which scal es with the atomic number A. Because the escaping positron has a very small momentum, the tiny nuclear momentum change will not affect the rigidity. 3III. NUCLEAR EXCITATION Many types of electromagnetic excitation are possible for n uclei. Single or multiple photon absorption is possible, and the excited states can de cay via single or multiple neutron emission or by nuclear breakup. The most common is a Giant Dip ole Resonance (GDR), where the protons and neutrons oscillate collectively agai nst each other. GDRs usually decay by single neutron emission. Because of its large cross secti on, we focus on GDR excitation and single neutron decay. Higher resonances typically have more complex decays, often involving multiple neutrons. The cross section for photonuclear excitation of a given nuc leus is σ(A+A→AGDR+A) =/integraldisplay∞ 0dnγ dkσGDR(k)dk (2) where kis the photon energy, dnγ/dkis the Weizs¨ acker-Williams photon spectrum, subject to the condition that the nuclei don’t interact hadronicall y [2] [8], and σGDR(k) is the GDR excitation cross section. For heavy nuclei, the cross secti on peaks k= 31.2A−1/3MeV + 20.6A−1/6MeV [9]. For symmetric systems, the cross section can be para meterized [10] σ(A+A→AGDR+A) = 3.42µb(A−Z)Z3 A2/3ln (2γ2−1). (3) Because this formula does not include other photoexcitatio n processes this cross section is lower than some quoted elsewhere. For example, Ref. [4] gi ves a formula for GDR electro- magnetic dissociation with a coefficient about 20% higher tha n Eq. (3). The cross sections from Eq. (3), listed in Table I, are less well determined than for electron capture, because of competition with higher order processes, which can lead t o multiple neutron emission. For lower energy gold interactions, the cross section for 2- neutron emission is about 20% of single neutron emission cross section [11]. Of course, this ratio could rise at higher energies. For lighter nuclei, the higher order processes should be muc h less important. Since Eq. (3) fits existing low energy data fairly well, we use it here. For heavy ions, these cross sections are comparable to those for electron capture. Table II shows single beam loss rates for GDR excitation. For heavy io ns, losses are comparable with 4electron capture. Because GDR excitation is much less Z-dependent than electron capture, it is the dominant process for lighter ions. Losses range up t o 1.6 million particles/second and 36 watts for calcium at the LHC. Unlike electron capture, with neutron emission, the nuclea r recoil is significant. The γ+A→(A−1) +nreaction is a two-body problem; neglecting the small change in binding energy, in the rest frame the nuclear recoil momentu m ispexc.=√2mnk, where mnis the nucleon mass. In the lab frame, the nuclear momentum ch ange is a maximum of ∆/p=pexc./Am n, depending on the emission direction. IV. TARGET REGION Because the rigidity change is small, the affected nuclei wil l strike the beampipe a consid- erable distance down the beampipe, with the exact location d epending on the beam optics. Here, we consider a simple model, with the nuclei in circular orbits in a constant magnetic field. The radius of curvature is R=pA/ZecB , where pAis nuclear momentum and Bthe magnetic field. For an intact nucleus, Rmust match the accelerator radius R0. Electron capture decreases Zby 1, so the radius of curvature increases to R=Z/(Z− 1)R0, a change of ∆ R=R0/Z. The trajectory will gradually be displaced outward from the beampipe centerline, with the displacement from the cen ter growing as the square of the distance travelled. If the nucleus travels an angle θaround the accelerator, the displacement isx= 2∆Rθ2/π2. It will strike a beampipe with radius dafter moving an angle/radicalBig πd/2∆R, a distance Dc=θR0=π/radicalBigg R0Zd 2(4) downstream from the interaction region. In the RHIC magnets ,d= 3.45 cm [3] while for LHC the horizontal magnet opening is d= 4.4 cm [12]. Values of Dcare listed in Table IV. Neutron loss decreases the rigidity by a factor ( A−1)/A, reducing the radius of curvature toR= (A−1)/AR 0. With ∆ R=R0/A, the nucleus will hit the beampipe a distance 5Dd=π/radicalBigg R0Ad 2(5) downstream. Table IV gives values of Dd. Since A∼2Z,Dd∼√ 2Dc. DcandDdare the distances to the middle of the target regions; the len gth of the target region depends on the spreading of the altered beam. Several factors contribute to the spreading: the momentum spread of the incident beam, nuclea r recoil (for GDR excitation), and the size of the hadronic shower when the particle hits the beampipe. Focusing from the beam optics will also have a big effect; this factor is neglect ed here. We simply assume that the optics remove the effect of perpendicular momentum varia tions, leaving the longitudinal momentum variations unaffected. We will add the rms momentum spreading for each of these factors in quadrature, neglecting corrections due to the non-Gaussian nature of the distributions. RHIC is designed for a maximum momentum spread, ∆ p/p= 1.5×10−3[3] [13]. At the LHC ∆ p/p= 10−4[14]. These ∆ p/pare maximum variation; σp/p≈(1/√ 3) ∆p/p. These numbers are typical; with time, intra-beam scattering and b eam-beam interactions increase the momentum spread. The momentum spread also affects the radius of curvature, wit hσR/R 0=σp/p. Ne- glecting magnetic focusing, an intact beam particle with in dividual momentum variation δ will hit the beampipe a distance Dδ=π/radicalBigg Rd 2(|δ|/p)(6) downstream from the interaction region. Without magnetic f ocusing, particles with δ/p= σp/p would strike the beampipe 118 meters and 12 km downstream at R HIC and LHC respectively. For GDR excitation, the recoil from the neutron emission affe cts the ion momentum. pexc.is the maximum momentum change; this can be approximated as a Gaussian with σp/p≈0.6pexc/pA. This σp/pis added in quadrature to the beam spread. It is usually the dominant factor. 6The interactions and momentum changes are combined by addin g the σR, with D±=πR/radicalBigg d 2σR±(7) where σR±are found by adding and subtracting the σRdue to momentum spread from the σRfrom the rigidity change. Energy is deposited over a length L=D+−D−. Assuming that the individual particle momenta follow a Gaussian dist ribution, 68% of the particles hit within this target area. These L, given in Table IV, are small compared to D±. The small L:Dratio is an indication that magnetic focusing will not drast ically change the picture presented here. When the nucleus hits the beampipe, the size and shape of the h adronic shower depend on the target geometry and magnetic field. This will affect how much of the energy is deposited in the cryogenically cooled magnet. The magnet as sembly can be approximated as copper [15], which has a hadronic interaction length Λ = 15 cm. At 100 GeV/nucleon (3.5 TeV/nucleon), 99% (95%) of the energy is deposited within 10 Λ [14], or 1.5 meters. Most of this energy is deposited within a few Λ of the point of maxim um shower development; we treat the energy deposition as a Gaussian, with 2 σ= 6Λ=0.9 meters. This 2 σis added in quadrature with Lto give the total target length. So, 68% of the total energy sh ould be deposited within this region. Of course, some of the energy will escape down the beampipe or into the surrounding environment. Here, we assume that half of the energy reaches the cold volume, with the other half escaping. With these assumptions, the average po wer dissipations are given in Table V. Even though the electron capture and GDR beams have s imilar power, the energy deposition is more localized for electron capture because o f the GDR nuclear recoil. Lead and niobium are the most problematic, depositing 2.1 W/m and 3.0 W/m respectively. These loads must be compared with the local cooling capacity . The RHIC Conceptual Design Report does not specify a value for beam induced heati ng loads. However, at 4oK, 2.5 Watts of cooling is planned for a 9.7 meter long dipole [3] . The power dissipations are far smaller than this. 7At the LHC, the expected heat loads are much higher. The main s ources, synchrotron radiation and image currents are expected to deposit 0.6 W/m and 0.8 W/m on the beampipe respectively. A screen will be installed inside the magnets to divert this heat from the 1 .9oK magnets [16]; less than 0.1 W/m is expected to leak through th e screen. The accelerator design also allows for 0.1 W/m from inelastic nuclear scatte ring which cannot be shielded [12], for a total of 0.2 W/m. Because of the low luminosity, sy nchrotron radiation and image currents are negligible for ion collisions, so the entire 0. 2 W/m could be ’allocated’ to beam losses. This 0.2 W/m is less than 10% of the 2.1 and 3.0 W/m expe cted from electron capture for lead and niobium beams. The local temperature rise from this energy will depend on th e local cooling capacity and thermal resistance. At 7 TeV, a loss of 8 ×106protons/meter/second will induce a quench [15]; this is about 8 watts/meter, uncomfortably close to th e heat loads calculated above. Since the altered-rigidity beams will remain in the horizon tal plane of the accelerator, and strike the outside (for electron capture) and inside (for GD R excitation) of the beampipe, the heating will be uneven, and local hot spots are likely. Th ese hot spots could induce a quench even if the average power is below the quench limit. V. DISCUSSION At RHIC, the local heating due to altered-rigidity beams is w ithin the available cooling capacity. At the LHC, these altered rigidity beams have high er powers, up to 36 watts. At the same time, the target regions are shorter than at RHIC, an d the cooling capacities are somewhat lower, because the LHC uses supercooled magnets. W ith niobium beams, the expected heating is 3.0 W/m, 15 times the expected beam heat l oad of 0.2 W/m. For lead, the ’standard’ ion choice, the heating is 2.1 W/m, 10 times th e expected load. These loads are close to the expected quench limit of 8 W/m. Wh en the detailed dis- tribution of energy deposition is considered, electron cap ture from either lead or niobium beams might deposit enough energy to cause a magnet quench. W ith GDR, the heat loads 8are lower, but may be problematic for niobium and calcium bea ms. These estimates are based on back-of-the-envelope calcula tions; the uncertainties are correspondingly large. The most important missing factors are the charged particle optics and the magnet arrangement. The former could change the patt ern of the energy deposition, by decreasing or increasing the length of the target area, wh ile the latter determines how the energy affects the magnet. Detailed simulations are need ed to study both factors. At the LHC, a calculation using the magnetic dispersion finds ta rget regions with L= 1 m for lead, 30% smaller than was found here [18]. However, for lead and niobium, it is not unlikely that supple mentary cooling will be required. Alternately, it might be possible to install new c ollimators to channel the energy deposition. Current LHC plans call for a single collimator, located in one of the interaction regions [19]. In higher-luminosity scenarios, the heating can be up to five times higher. In these scenarios, localized energy deposition could be the lumino sity limiting factor. The beams will also deposit significant radiation in these re gions. Although radiation damage is beyond the scope of this article, current studies n eglect this source [17]. Finally, it might be possible to extract these altered-rigi dity beams and use them for fixed target experiments. Electron capture beams are the mos t appropriate for extraction, because of the smaller emittance. The particle rates are com parable to those at existing fixed target heavy ion accelerators. At the LHC, the beam ener gies would exceed existing fixed target sources. VI. CONCLUSIONS Both pair production with capture and nuclear excitation wi th neutron emission produce beams of ions with altered magnetic rigidity. These beams wi ll follow defined trajectories and strike the collider beampipe downstream of the interact ion regions, producing localized energy deposition. 9At RHIC, this energy deposition is small, and should not caus e problems. However, with lead, niobium or calcium beams at the LHC, simple calculatio ns indicate that the energy deposition will be far larger than the planned cooling. Furt her studies are needed to confirm these simple models. If the local heating exceeds the availa ble cooling, the magnets could quench; electron capture could limit the luminosity achiev able with heavy or medium ions. In addition, these beams could cause localized radiation da mage. These problems become even worse for high luminosity running, with 25 nsec spacing between heavy ion bunches. On the positive side, with appropriate optics, these beams c ould be extracted and used for fixed target experiments. It is a pleasure to acknowledge useful exchanges with Bernar d Jeanneret, Nikolai Mokhov and Steve Peggs. This work was supported by the US DOE, under c ontract DE-AC-03- 76SF00098. 10REFERENCES [1] J. Nystrand and S. Klein, nucl-ex/9811007, in Proc. Workshop on Photon Interactions and the Photon Structure , eds. G. Jarlskog and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Lund, Sweden, Sept., 19 98. [2] G. Baur, K. Hencken and D. Trautman, J. Phys. G24(1998) 1457. [3]Conceptual Design of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider , BNL-52195, May, 1989, Brookhaven National Laboratory. [4] N. Ahmad et al.,ALICE Technical Proposal , CERN/LHCC 95-71, Dec., 1995. These calculations and results are also in D. Brandt, K. Eggert and A. Morsch, CERN AT/94- 05, March, 1994. [5] A. J. Baltz, M. J. Rhoades-Brown and J. Weneser, Phys. Rev . A47(1993) 3444. [6] C. A. Bertulani and G. Baur, Phys. Rep. 163(1988) 299. [7] P. Grafstr¨ om et al.,Measurement of Electromagnetic Cross Sections in Heavy Ion In- teractions and its consequences for Luminosity Lifetimes i n Ion Colliders , CERN-SL- 99-033 EA. [8] S. Klein and J. Nystrand, Phys. Rev. C60, 014903 (1999). [9] B. L. Berman and S. C. Fultz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47(1975) 713. [10] G. Baur and C. A. Bertulani, Nucl. Phys. A505 (1989) 835. [11] T. Aumann et al., Phys. Rev. C47(1993) 1728. [12] O. Gr¨ obner, LHC Project Report 181, May, 1998, present ed at the 1997 Particle Accel- erator Conference, Vancouver, Canada, May, 1997. [13] S. Peggs (private communication, 2000) quotes an σp/p= 8×10−4at the end of a spill; this is slightly lower than the ∆ p/pused here. [14] C. Caso et al.(PDG group), Eur. Phys. J. C3(1998) 1. 11[15] J. B. Jeanneret, D. Leroy, L. Oberli and T. Trenkler, Quench Levels and Transient Beam Losses in LHC Magnets , LHC Project Report 44, July, 1996. [16] L. R. Evans, LHC Accelerator Physics and Technology Challenges , LHC Project Report 303, April, 1999, presented at the 1999 Particle Accelerato r Conference, March 29-April 2, 1999, New York, USA. [17] S. Roesler and G. R. Stevenson, Estimation of Dose to Components close to the low- β insertions at LHC point 2 (ALICE), CERN/TIS-RP/IR/99-15, April, 1999. [18] B. Jeanneret, private communication, 2000. [19] A. I. Drozhdin and N. V. Mokhov, Optimisation of the LHC Beam Cleaning System with Respect to Beam Losses in the High Luminosity Insertions , CERN-LHC-Project-Report 148, Oct., 1997; I.Azhgirey, I. Baishev, N. Catalan Lashera s, J. B. Jeanneret, Cascade Simulations for the LHC Betatron Cleaning Insertion , CERN-LHC-Project-Report 184, May, 1998. 12TABLES Machine Ion Beam Energy Design Luminosity σ(e−capture) σ(GDR) RHIC gold 100 GeV/n 2 ×1026cm−2s−145 b 58 b RHIC iodine 104 GeV/n 2 .7×1027cm−2s−16.5 b 15 b RHIC silicon 125 GeV/n 4 .4×1028cm−2s−11.8 mb 150 mb LHC lead 2.76 TeV/n 1 ×1027cm−2s−1102 b 113 b LHC niobium 3.1 TeV/n 6 .5×1028cm−2s−13.1 b 10 b LHC calcium 3.5 TeV/n 2 ×1030cm−2s−136 mb 800 mb LHC oxygen 3.5 TeV/n 3 ×1031cm−2s−181µb 37 mb TABLE I. Luminosity and beam kinetic energy for heavy ion bea ms at RHIC and LHC. The RHIC luminosities are from Ref. [3]. Different references qu ote somewhat different ion luminosities for the LHC; these are the peak luminosities for a single expe riment and 125 nsec bunch spacing from Table 8.3 of Ref. [4]. Also given are cross sections for e lectron capture and for electromagnetic GDR excitation followed by single neutron emission. Beam Capture Loss (pps) Capture Power Loss GDR loss (pps) GDR Power loss RHIC - Au 8,900 28 mW 12,000 37 mW RHIC - I 18,000 37 mW 40,000 85 mW RHIC - Si 82 46 µW 6,500 3.6 mW LHC- Pb 102,000 10. W 113,000 11 W LHC- Nb 196,000 9.1 W 650,000 30 W LHC- Ca 73,000 1.6 W 1,600,000 36 W LHC- O 2,400 22 mW 1,100,000 10 W TABLE II. Single Beam loss rates, in particles per second (pp s), and single beam power losses, for electron capture and GDR excitation. 13Accelerator Mean Accelerator Radius Beam Pipe Radius ∆ p/p RHIC 610 m 3.45 cm 1 .5×10−3 LHC 4245 m 4.4 cm 1 ×10−4 TABLE III. Some characteristics of RHIC and LHC. The acceler ators are not perfectly circular; the radius is calculated from the overall circumference. Th e beampipe radius is the horizontal aperture inside the magnets. The momentum spread is somewha t ion-dependent. The spread will increase gradually as the beams circulate and collide. Beam Capture-Distance Capture L GDR Distance GDR L RHIC - Au 91 m 6.2 m 143 m 28 m RHIC - I 74 m 3.4 m 115 m 18 m RHIC - Si 38 m 0.5 m 54 m 7 m LHC- Pb 275 m 1.3 m 438 m 44 m LHC- Nb 194 m 0.5 m 293 m 32 m LHC- Ca 136 m 0.16 m 192 m 23 m LHC- O 86 m 0.04 m 121 m 16 m TABLE IV. Beam impact point (distance from the interaction r egion) for electron capture and GDR excited nuclei, based on a simple geometric model. The Lcolumns show the variation in impact distance due to the beam momentum spread and, for GDR e xcitation, including nuclear recoil; the recoil usually dominates over the accelerator e nergy spread. The hadronic shower development is not included. 14Beam Capture Power Dissipation GDR Power Dissipation Cooli ng Capacity RHIC - Au 1.5 mW/m 0.4 mW/m - RHIC - I 3.6 mW/m 1.6 mW/m - RHIC - Si 15 µW/m 0.2 mW/m - LHC - Pb 2.1 W/m 0.1 W/m 0.2 W/m LHC - Nb 3.0 W/m 0.3 W/m 0.2 W/m LHC - Ca 0.6 W/m 0.5 W/m 0.2 W/m LHC - O 82 mW/m 0.2 W/m 0.2 W/m TABLE V. Power dissipation per unit length for electron capt ure and GDR excitation. Both dissipations assume 68% of the power is deposited within a ±1σtarget region, where the σincludes the momentum spread, GDR recoil, and hadronic shower. Half o f this energy is assumed to end up in the magnet, with the other half escaping. Also shown, fo r comparison, is the planned cooling capacity at the LHC. If the LHC uses a 25 nsec bunch spacing to i ncrease the luminosity, the dissipation will grow by a factor of 5. 15

arXiv:physics/0005033v1 [physics.pop-ph] 11 May 2000The INT at Age Ten Wick Haxton Institute for Nuclear Theory, Box 351550 University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 Abstract The history of the Department of Energy’s Institute for Nucl ear Theory, located on the campus of the University of Washington, is rev iewed on the occasion of the INT’s tenth anniversary. To appear in Nuclear Physics News. 1The US Department of Energy’s Institute for Nuclear Theory ( INT) be- gan operations on the campus of the University of Washington in March, 1990. In the decade following, the INT has played an importan t role in helping the field of nuclear physics through a period of rapid change. With the relativistic heavy ion programs at CERN and Brookhaven, the precision electroweak efforts at Jefferson Lab, and rapid evolution of s ophisticated so- lar neutrino experiments, the field’s frontiers have broade ned to include the substructure of the nucleon, the properties of QCD at high te mperature and baryon density, and the nature of physics beyond the standar d model. With this evolution, the intersections of nuclear physics with s ister subfields – as- trophysics, particle physics, condensed matter, and atomi c physics – have become both richer and more entangled. Theory in particular has profited, attracting young phenomenologists who would previously ha ve carried some other label, and becoming enriched with new intellectual ch allenges like effec- tive field theory, the pattern of neutrino masses, and color s uperconductivity. Thus, on this tenth birthday of the INT, it is appropriate to l ook back at the role the Institute has played in these changing times, and sp eculate on how it might continue to help the field in the coming decade. The History The creation of the INT was the culmination of a process begun by the Koonin Committee, a subcommittee of the Nuclear Science Adv isory Com- mittee (NSAC). NSAC, which advises the US Department of Ener gy (DOE) and National Science Foundation (NSF), asked the Koonin Com mittee to assess the health of nuclear theory and recommend steps that could be taken to strengthen it, given the coming challenges of JLab and RHI C. One of the recommendations included in its 1988 report was “...The creation of one or more nuclear theory centers. Such centers must be trul y national in character, must have a significant interdisciplinary compo nent, and must be viewed and funded as an important complement to the strength ened indi- vidual programs.” In response to the subsequent DOE announc ement, five collaborations submitted proposals for establishing the I NT, which were re- viewed by a DOE-appointed selection committee that visited the proposed sites. In its selection of the Seattle proposal, the committ ee cited its strong and coherent management plan, its emphasis on young people a nd visitor programs, its focus on interdisciplinary problems involvi ng nuclear physics, 2and the strong local commitment. This commitment included a substantial start-up grant by the Murdock Charitable Trust and a promise by the Uni- versity of Washington to create permanent quarters for the I NT within its planned new building for physics and astronomy. The INT opened in the spring of 1990 with a three-month progra m on Quarks and Nuclei. Ernest Henley, who had been instrumental in bring- ing the INT to Seattle, served as Director until September, 1 991, and was succeeded by Wick Haxton, the current Director. Both the staffing of the INT and visitor program selection were (and are) guided by the INT’s National Advisory Committee (NAC). The N AC con- sists of nine members who broadly represent the nuclear phys ics community, including areas of intersection with other physics subfield s. The NAC has traditionally included several European or Asian members, who provide an international perspective and help maintain closer ties wi th sister institutes like those at Trento and Adelaide. New members, appointed fo r three year terms, are nominated by current NAC members, who seek input f rom the physics community, including the Division of Nuclear Physi cs of the Amer- ican Physical Society. Nominees must be approved by the Dire ctor of the Division of Nuclear Physics of the DOE. The NAC traditionall y meets each August to review program and workshop proposals received fr om the com- munity, advising the Director on their timeliness and merit , and providing constructive suggestions for promising but unsuccessful p roposals. The NAC chooses its own chair. Steve Koonin, John Negele, Jim Friar, Berndt M¨ uller, and Vijay Pandharipande have served in this role. Although N AC members volunteer their time, all 30 invitations extended in the pas t decade have been accepted. After assisting the University of Washington with the appoi ntment of Haxton as Director in 1991, the NAC turned to the question of t he INT’s other permanent faculty. The goal was to create a small but st rong “in house” group who would have broad interests in nuclear physi cs and related fields, could contribute to the vigor of the INT’s visitors pr ogram, and would stimulate the postdocs and other young people working at the INT. The NAC’s 1992 search for the INT’s first Senior Fellow resulted i n the appoint- ment of George Bertsch, previously holder of the Hannah Prof essorship at Michigan State University. In 1994 David Kaplan joined the I NT as the second Senior Fellow. David had been Associate Professor of physics at the University of California, San Diego. The INT faculty hold te nured positions 3in the University of Washington Department of Physics. This faculty hiring was a component of the five-year start-up plan for the INT that had been negotiated by the DOE and University of W ashing- ton. It paralleled similar increases in INT visitor activit ies, the postdoctoral program, and the administrative staff. The INT became comple te with the opening of its permanent quarters in the new Physics/Astron omy building on August 15, 1994. One weekend in the middle of an adaptly nam ed sum- mer program (Applications of Chaos), the INT moved from its t emporary quarters in Henderson Hall. The new facilities included 22 o ffices, a sem- inar room, and a conference room. Most important, the INT’s i mmediate neighbors where now the Physics Department’s nuclear, cond ensed matter, and particle theory groups. This greatly increased interac tions among INT visitors and the department’s faculty, and led to much more f requent par- ticipation in INT programs by department experimentalists and non-nuclear theorists. (The department’s nuclear theorists, undeterr ed by the four-block walk to Henderson Hall, had been active participants in the I NT from the beginning.) Much of the vitality of the INT derives from its young people. Generally the INT hosts two Fellows, young researchers appointed for fi ve-year terms who hold the rank of Research Assistant Professor in the Phys ics Department. The original siting committee for the INT argued strongly fo r these positions: they anticipated that the visibility of the position would e nhance the careers of the Fellows, and that the Fellows would help mentor the INT ’s postdocs. Three of the four veterans of this position already hold tenu red university positions. The current occupants are Paulo Bedaque (former ly a postdoc in the Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT) and Lev Kaplan (f ormerly a Harvard junior fellow). In addition, the INT typically hosts five or six postdocs, abo ut half of whom are supported by various international fellowships. T he INT’s young people are generally quite active in the visitor programs, a nd have, on a number of occasions, taken lead roles in the organization of workshops. For example, Lev Kaplan teamed with INT postdoc Thomas Papenbro ck to or- ganize the INT’s March, 2000, Workshop on Complex Systems an d Quantum Chaos. The INT faculty endeavor to select postdocs based on researc h promise and potential for independence, and give little emphasis to the candidate’s overlap with the local research program. There is a willingn ess to consider 4relevant talent from particle physics, astrophysics, nonl inear dynamics, and other subfields with connections to nuclear phyics. The unde rlying philos- ophy is that promising, independent researchers will becom e intellectually engaged in our visitor and local activities, and thus in the c hallenges facing nuclear physics. While there is some risk in this approach, t he successes ap- pear to outweigh the failures. A large fraction of the INT’s f ormer postdocs have already found assistant professor and staff positions i n strong depart- ments (Colorado, Minnesota, Stony Brook, Brookhaven, and L os Alamos). Although the INT’s original plan made no provision for the fa culty to supervise local graduate students, it soon became apparent that this had been an oversight. At the time of the INT’s first renewal – the suppo rting DOE grants cover five year periods – two inadvertent barriers to l ocal graduate student involvement in the INT were removed. The second 5-ye ar grant permitted the support of graduate students as research assi stants and also made it easier for INT faculty to teach, if they desired. Grad uate students are now a vital part of the INT research effort. Programs, Workshops, and Schools The three annual programs are the center of INT activities. T ypically running for about three months, a program brings visiting ph ysicists to the INT to focus on some forefront issue facing the field. Approxi mately one- third of the program proposals submitted by community membe rs succeed on first submission. Successful proposers are then asked to o rganize their programs, helped and guided by the INT’s administrative sta ff, which handles matters such as visas, housing, and space and budget project ions. The staff endeavors to free the organizers from as much clerical detai l as possible, leaving the physicists to focus on matters requiring their s cientific judgment (such as which applications to accept and which seminars to s chedule). A typical program involves 60-70 visitors (though on occasi on the total has approached or exceeded 100). The average participant sp ends 3-4 weeks at the INT, though each program has a few key participants tha t remain in residence throughout the program. Weekly attendence thus i s about 18, close to the INT’s capacity. There is significant particpation by e xperimentalists, who typically visit for shorter periods. Overseas particip ants account for 30-40% of the total. Organizers are asked to encourage the pa rticipation of women physicists and others from underrepresented groups. 5Programs attempt to provide participants with long periods for concen- trated individual research and for collaborative work with others. The pri- mary mechanism for stimulating collaborations is the morni ng seminar, where newcomers are quickly assimilated into the group and where m any discus- sions begin. Small working groups often form to continue dis cussion into the afternoon and, not infrequently, after dinner. Participan ts have keys allowing access to the INT and to the physics library 24 hours a day. The programs are scheduled for spring, summer, and fall, wit h a two- month break from mid-December to late February. Traditiona lly programs with strongly interdisciplinary themes are scheduled in th e summer, e.g., subjects such as neutrino physics, effective field theory, an d neutron stars. An important success of the INT has been its popularity in the general physics community, with strong participation by astro, par ticle, atomic, and condensed matter physicists as organizers and visitors. Su mmers appear to be the time when non-nuclear participants are most easily at tracted to the INT. The INT also organizes frequent shorter workshops and miniw orkshops, more intense activities involving a series of seminars and w orking group dis- cussions, and lasting typically from two days to a week. Some of these are organized as part of and in conjunction with programs. For ex ample, organiz- ers may designate the first week of a program as an introductor y workshop, enlarging the program participation for that week. Others a re independent of the programs. Over the last five years, an average of four su ch “stand alone” workshops have been held each year. Two highly successful efforts are the JLab/INT and RHIC annua l work- shops. Both have a similar goal: to bring together roughly eq ual numbers of theorists and experimentalists to focus on specific aspects of the programs at these two major facilities. Traditionally there has been an emphasis on young researchers, both as participants and as workshop org anizers. The JLab/INT series, now in its seventh year, is jointly support ed by Jefferson Laboratory and the INT, with the location generally alterna ting between these two sites. The community is invited to suggest topics ( and volun- teer as organizers). The RHIC Winter Workshops, now in their fifth year, are jointly sponsored by Brookhaven National Laboratory, L awrence Berke- ley National Laboratory, and the INT. The site usually alter nates between LBNL and the INT. A steering committee, comprised of BNL, LBN L, and INT physicists, is responsible for selecting topics and rec ruiting appropri- 6ate organizers. Although originally envisioned as small an d very focused workshops involving 25-30 participants, it has proven impo ssible to limit at- tendance, given the strong interest in the JLab and RHIC prog rams. While some of the workshops have grown to 100 or more participants, the schedule of talks is controlled so that the emphasis remains on discus sions, rather then formal presentations. The remaining “stand alone” workshops are generaly one-tim e efforts fo- cused on specific topics. While proposals can be made to the NA C, often workshops are approved quickly by the Director, so that the w orkshop lead time is reduced. As the cost of a workshop is typically 5-10% t hat of a pro- gram, this is a cost-effective way of addressing specific “hot topics” arising in nuclear physics. Often these workshops are organized in col laboration with outside institutes or universities. Recent examples inclu de Harvard’s Insti- tute for Theoretical Atomic and Molecular Physics (ITAMP) [ Hyperspherical Harmonic Methods]; Caltech [Nuclear Physics with Effective Field Theory]; Santa Barbara’s Institute for Theoretical Physics (ITP) [T ime-Dependent Density Functional Theory]; and Argonne National Laborato y [Pion Pro- duction Near Threshold]. In such cases the collaborating in stitution often provides the site and logistical support, in addition to par tial funding. In order to make the results of selected workshops available to a wider audience, the INT entered into an agreement with World Scien tific to publish proceedings. The eleventh volume of the INT series is now in p roduction. Another mode of communicating and publishing occurs via the INT’s web site. Workshop transparencies can be scanned into the web si te. An audio option will soon be added. Applications to attend workshops and programs are now also handled online. In addition to programs and workshops, the INT is involved in several programs that encourage students to pursue physics and nucl ear physics. These efforts grew out of discussions between the DOE, INT, an d NAC at the time of the DOE’s first five-year review of the INT, and refle cted concerns about the declining interest of US students in physics gener ally. One effort began in 1995 under the auspices of the NSF’s progra m, Re- search Experiences for Undergraduates. Undergraduates fr om colleges across the US, most of whom have completed their junior years, are br ought to the University of Washington for a 10-week period of intensive r esearch under the direction of a faculty mentor. The program is administer ed by the INT and operated jointly with the physics department’s various research groups. 7The program is very popular, this year generating about 230 a pplications for 12 positions, with an acceptance rate of nearly 90% for first o ffers. Now in its sixth year, the program has served more than 80 students, about half of whom have chosen to do projects in nuclear physics. One inter esting demo- graphic is the large number of applications from women: near ly 40% of our REU students are female. Approximately 20% of the class late r returns to graduate school at the University of Washington, and many ot hers are doing advanced studies elsewhere. One goal of the program is to int roduce students to nuclear physics in the hope that this will influence future education and career choices. A second effort is the National Summer School in Nuclear Physi cs, now in its 13th year. Sponsored by the NSF, the school is intended for advanced graduate students and beginning postdoctoral researchers . Community mem- bers volunteer to host and organize the school. There is a ste ering commit- tee, selected by the Executive Committee of the Division of N uclear Physics, American Physical Society, that is responsible for oversig ht. Following an unfortunate cancellation of one school seven y ears ago, the steering committee invited the INT to take over the school’s administration, hoping this step would help stabilize the effort. This admini strative help – secretarial support, advertising, mailing, and poster pro duction, etc. – is provided through the INT’s DOE grant. The INT has also hosted the school twice. The INT has pledged to continue its support through at least 2004. The school attracts 40-50 students each year. The year 2000 s chool will be held July 3-14 on the campus of the University of California, Santa Cruz. Outlook at Age Ten The scale of activities at the INT, ten years after its foundi ng, is remark- ably different from that envisioned in the original proposal . That proposal described three annual programs attracting approximately ten visiting scien- tists each. Today the INT attracts 350 visitors each year. Th e list of Affiliates – previous visitors and those wanting to be kept informed of I NT activities – now numbers nearly 2000. (Many of these are younger researc hers, an em- phasis of the INT that was envisioned in the original proposa l.) The strength of the participation by physicists from other fields, from ov erseas, and from experiment was not foreseen. Nor was the community’s enthus iasm for the INT’s topical workshops, many of which are organized collab oratively with 8other institutes, laboratories, and universities. Finall y, the original proposers wondered how long the community could support three annual p rograms. Yet the INT receives an average of ten program proposals each yea r, the quality of which has risen steadily. The INT’s most common problem is its inability to accommodate the numbers of applicants who wish to attend t he programs. The success of the INT – as well as that of its European counter part the ECT* – likely results in part from a sound “formula” and in part from changes in the way nuclear physics is now done. The INT’s emph asis on the intersections with other fields and on collaboration res onates with the changes occurring in our field due to JLab, RHIC, and SNO. Thes e facilities address issues relevant to nuclear, particle, and astrophy sics. There is much anecdotal evidence that the INT’s efforts to expose this phys ics to a wider community has led to a broader appreciation of our field. Simi larly, the the- ory questions arising from the new facilities are often far m ore complex than those of previous times. The INT’s emphasis on collaboratio n - among the- orists and with experimentalists - has helped theorists foc us their collective energies on difficult but crucial questions. The INT has evolved in ten years from an interesting experime nt to one of the institutions most responsible for the renewed optimi sm in our field. Its success derives from the support it has received from the com munity, from the program proposers who offer their ideas, from the partici pants who “vote with their feet” by coming to Seattle, and from DOE program offi cers who were willing to back this experiment with consistent fundin g. The INT will endeavor to respond as the community’s needs continue to evo lve, and as our field moves forward. Readers who would like to learn more about the INT – from its hi story to its current and future programs and workshops – are invite d to visit its web site, http://int.phys.washington.edu. 9

arXiv:physics/0005034v1 [physics.gen-ph] 12 May 2000Relativity as the quantum mechanics of space-time measurements Richard Lieu Department of Physics, University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL 35899, U.S.A. 1Abstract It is by now standard knowledge that a major difficulty in incor porating Maxwell’s equations of light propagation with First Relativity Postu late (FRP) was resolved by Einstein when he invoked the Second Relativity Postulate (S RP), which states that the speed of light in vacuum is a universal constant. While a prim ary goal of physics is to explain phenomena with minimal assumptions, many previous attempts in formulating a robust theory by using the FRP without the SRP inadvertantl y involved additional postulates or interpretations which are even more complica ted. Here I describe how Special Relativity is explained as a quantum measurement eff ect, and is a consequence of the FRP alone if one insists upon having the same set of phys ical laws for all inertial observers, including the manner in which space and time are quantized . Two consequences emerge: (a) the speed of light chas further meaning, it is the ratio of the length quantum to the time quantum, which by the FRP must be the same for all ob servers; (b) the minimum position and timing uncertainties experienced by a n observer always appear to be smaller than those of his ‘moving’ partner. This increase of uncertainties with motion is the reason why measured distances and time intervals are not absolute. Moreover, because the increase is accounted for precisely and simply b y the quantum mechanics of harmonic oscillators, this lends a posteriori credence to the basic premise of space-time measurements being governed by intrinsic quantization. 2In contemporary physics the FRP is usually viewed as a portra it of the complete symmetry between inertial observers. Specifically all such observers experience the same laws of physics[1]. This Postulate, though simply stated, i s extremely powerful because application of it to new physical principles could lead to im portant consequences. The supreme example is when Maxwell’s equation of electromagne tic wave (i.e. light) propa- gation finally became recognized as a universal law of nature . In order that the equation be invariant with respect to all inertial frames, their coor dinates cannot be related by the Galilean transformation (which assumes space and time are a bsolute), but by the Lorentz transformation[2]. A way of arriving at the latter simply an d logically, as suggested by Einstein[3], is to introduce a Second Relativity Postulate (hereafter SRP), which states that the speed of light is a universal constant, independent not only of inertial frames, but also the motion of the emission source in each frame. Thus , although Einstein did fruitfully integrate Maxwell’s theory with the FRP, it was n ecessary for him to enlist a separate postulate. Does this mean the statement of symmetr y provided by the FRP, though very elegant, only plays the role of compelling and gu iding us to invoke further postulates everytime we have to deal with a new physical law ? Here I discuss another possibility, viz. that the reason why FRP appears insufficient is because, unlike Newton’s laws, neither Maxwell’s theory no r Einstein’s SRP have touched upon the underlying physics in its primitive form. This phys ics is simply that micro- scopically space and time are quantized: there exists a pair of independent and minimum uncertainties in one’s ability to measure the coordinates ( x, t) of an event, which are de- noted by ( xo, to), and which cannot be surpassed irrespective of an instrume nt’s accuracy. 3When incorporated with the FRP, the Postulate reads: ‘all inertial observers experience the same laws of physics, including the same limiting abilit y to measure positions and times’ . I shall investigate whether this will naturally lead to a un ique set of frame trans- formation equations, using the FRP alone. Before doing so, h owever, I designate the ratio xo/toa universal constant vowhich has the dimension of a speed. Let us first examine the Galilean transformation G. The event data of an inertial observer Σ are, as above, ( x±xo, t±to). How do these two measurements appear to another observer Σ′who moves relative to Σ with velocity v= (v,0,0) ? According to G, Σ′reads the output coordinates of the experiment aboard Σ as ( x′±x′ o, t′±t′ o) where x′=x−vt,t′=t; and x′ o=xo/radicalBig 1 +v2/v2 o,t′ o=to. Here one does not necessarily find a conflict with the FRP: frame transformations can, without ch anging the laws of physics, alter the values of physical parameters, even expand (or con tract) measurement scales. The real difficulty, however, is the increase in the intrinsic positional uncertainty ( xo→ x′ o> x o)unaccompanied by a proportional increase in the limiting timing uncertain ty (to→t′ o=to); specifically one notices that the ratio xo/tochanges from votov′ o= x′ o/t′ o=vo/radicalBig 1 +v2/v2o> vo, i.e. Σ′did witness a fundamental result which is different in physical character from what he would have obtained had he performed the same experiment aboard his own frame. Thus if space-time quantiz ation is part of the basic physics required by the FRP to remain the same for all inertia l observers, Gwill indeed be inconsistent with the FRP. I proceed to seek a frame transformation which conserves the ratioxo/to=vo. I shall provide full details of this derivation: since one is not all owed to make use of the fact 4thatvois the propagation speed of a signal, the standard method can no longer be used. We start with Σ and Σ′having their spatial (cartesian) coordinate axes parallel to each other, and common space-time origin. The homogeneity and is otropy of space-time, a corollary of the FRP, immediately implies a linear relation ship between the two sets of 4-D coordinates with yandzseparated from the rest, i.e. t′=r(v)[t−s(v)x], x′=q(v)[x−p(v)t], y′=y, z′=z where the functions q,r, and scan depend only on v. By taking into account the fact that an object stationary relative to Σ′moves relative to Σ with speed valong + x, one easily deduces p(v) =v, so that t′=r(v)[t−s(v)x], x′=q(v)(x−vt), y′=y, z′=z (1) Next, since the combined operations r→r′,t→t′andv→ −vleave the situation unchanged, and since qandrare positive definite scale factors which cannot be sensitiv e to the sign of v(else there would be a preference between + xand−x), the inverse transformation reads: t=r(v)[t′−s(−v)x′], x=q(v)(x′+vt′), y=y′, z=z′(2) If in the x-transformation part of equ (1) one substitutes th e expressions for xandtfrom equ (2), and the result were to hold for all times, the coefficie nt oft′must vanish. This 5means: q(v) =r(v) (3) The second stage is to determine the functional forms of qands. It is necessary to repeat the thought experiment described earlier. If Σ measu res the position and time of an event to the unsurpassable accuracies ( xo, to), observer Σ′records the accuracies as: x′2 o=q2(v)x2 o/parenleftBigg 1 +v2 v2o/parenrightBigg ;t′2 o=q2(v)t2 o(1 +s2v2 o) (4) Theratiox′2 o/t′2 o=v2 o(1 +v2/v2 o)/(1 +s2v2 o) must, if the FRP were to be satisfied, equate tov2 o. Thus s=v v2 o. (5) By applying equ (5) to equs (1) through (3), one sees that in or der to have a consistently invertible transformation, q(v) assumes the form: q(v) =/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt1 1−v2 v2o, (6) and the full solution becomes: t′=t−vx v2o/radicalBig 1−v2 v2o;x′=x−vt/radicalBig 1−v2 v2o;y′=y;z′=z (7) Equ (7) will be the Lorentz transformation Lof Special Relativity if the ratio voof the 6length quantum to the time quantum is identified as the speed o f light in vacuum, c: vo=c (8) At this stage of the development two questions naturally ari se. First is whether the new approach is worthy of consideration given the tremendously successful theory of Einstein. Note that the starting point more fundamental - the present t reatment relies only on the FRP once we accept the notion of space-time being quantiz ed beyond some scale - a notion which is certainly not foreign to our current underst anding of microscopic physical reality. It is sometimes said, however, that even Special Re lativity can proceed without the SRP, if the Maxwell’s equations are accepted as among tho se physical laws which ‘participate’ in the FRP, i.e., they must be experienced by a ll inertial observers in the same way. The problem with such an argument, which is the reas on why Einstein explicitly invoked the SRP, is that Maxwell’s theory does not restrict u s to a unique interpretation in detail. For example, even if one abandons the ether concep t, and thereby integrates the electromagnetic wave equation with the FRP by insisting that all inertial observers must measure wave-like behavior in the fields with the same pr opagation speed c, it is not clear if, for a given observer, the equation is mindful of the state of motion of the emitting source in this frame. This is evidently the cause for the conf usion among the scientific community in the years preceding Einstein’s 1905 paper. I sh ould also remind the reader that the demonstrated possibility of using the Ltoderive the Maxwell’s equations[4] becomes very attractive if the former stems from independen t and more basic ideas. 7The second question is, on the supposition of a genuinely new and independent deriva- tion of Special Relativity being presented here, does it pla y a mere pedagogical role ? A crucial difference from Einstein’s theory exists, in that th e current approach attributes such relativistic effects as length contraction to the appar ent enlargement of quantum uncertainties (in positioning and timing) associated with motion. Moreover, the enlarge- ments are fully consistent with space-time being quantized like simple harmonic oscillators (cf. black body radiation). To prove this extremely importa nt point, we return to the intrinsic uncertainties which observer Σ suffers from, viz. xoandto. Observer Σ′notices that his ‘moving’ partner Σ is in fact subject to higher uncer tainties, viz. x′ oandt′ oas given in equ (4), where the meaning of the various symbols use d is to be found in equs (5) through (8). I only examine x′ o,since the treatment of t′ ois analogous . Equ (4) may be re-written as: x′2 o=x2 o 1 +2v2 c2 1−v2 c2  (9) When cast in the form of Equ (9), it is possible to secure a dire ct comparison with the harmonic oscillator. Denoting the zero-point energy and os cillator constant by ǫ/2 and κ, respectively, the minimum positional uncertainty of an osc illator is given by the ground state with origin as equilibrium point, and is equal to/radicalBig ǫ/(2κ). This must at present correspond to xo. Thus we have: ǫ= 2κx2 o (10) The above is realized only at zero temperature. At higher tem peratures T,x2 oincreases to x′2 o=x2 o(1+< x2 1> /x2 o), where < x2 1>is the mean-square amplitude due to the excited 8states, and is related to the mean energy of these states, ¯E=ǫe−ǫ kT/[1−exp(−ǫ/kT)], byκ < x2 1>=¯E. So we can write: x′2 o=x2 o/parenleftBigg 1 +ǫ κx2oe−ǫ kT 1−e−ǫ kT/parenrightBigg =x2 o/parenleftBigg 1 +2e−ǫ kT 1−e−ǫ kT/parenrightBigg (11) Equs (9) and (11), when taken together, suggest strongly the following association: v2 c2=e−ǫ kT. (12) The two equations are then in exact agreement. Therefore the increase in measurement inaccuracies of a moving observer follows precisely the fluc tuation enhancement of a ther- mally agitated quantum oscillator. In this way, we bolster a posteriori the earlier premise of space-time quantization. Moreover, there is now a clear r ationale for assigning a tem- perature to the space-time array of a moving observer[5]. Ap plications to the issues of mass and gravitation will be discussed in a separate work[5] . To summarize, numerous experimental results point to the qu antum nature of micro- scopic physical reality. One can therefore expect that the s tructure of space-time beyond certain scales is no exception. Yet because space-time form s the basic reference frame of all inertial observers, such a quantization scheme must obe y the FRP. The rest is logical deduction, and we are led to two principal conclusions: (a) t ransformation of coordinates between inertial frames takes the form of L, with the speed of light cinterpreted as the ratio of the length quantum to the time quantum; (b) Special R elativity is a manifesta- tion of the manner in which motion affects intrinsic capabili ties in positioning and timing, 9with the apparent increase in these two limiting measuremen t uncertainties of a moving observer completely explained by applying to space-time th e simplest quantization scheme among all - that of a harmonic oscillator. References [1] Poincare, H., 1905, ‘The Principles of Mathematics’, The Monist ,15, 1 – 24. [2] Lorentz, H.A., 1915, Theory of Electrons , 2nd edition, Dover, NY (1952). [3] Einstein, A., 1905, Annalen der Physik ,18, 891. [4] Purcell, E.M., 1963, Electricity and Magnetism , 173, NY. [5] Lieu, R., 2000, ApJL, submitted for publication. 10

arXiv:physics/0005035v1 [physics.atom-ph] 14 May 2000Optical and evaporative cooling of cesium atoms in the gravi to-optical surface trap M. Hammes, D. Rychtarik, V. Druzhinina,∗U. Moslener,†I. Manek-H¨ onninger,‡and R. Grimm Max-Planck-Institut f¨ ur Kernphysik, 69029 Heidelberg, G ermany (Dated: 02 May 2000) submitted to Journal of Modern Optics, special issue Fundamentals of Quantum Optics V , edt. by F. Ehlotzky We report on cooling of an atomic cesium gas closely above an e vanescent-wave atom mirror. At high densitities, optical cooling based on inelastic reflec tions is found to be limited by a density- dependent excess temperature and trap loss due to ultracold collisions involving repulsive molecular states. Nevertheless, very good starting conditions for su bsequent evaporative cooling are obtained. Our first evaporation experiments show a temperature reduct ion from 10 µK down to 300 nK along with a gain in phase-space density of almost two orders of mag nitude. I. INTRODUCTION Optical dipole traps based on far-detuned laser light have become very popular as versatile tools for the stor- age of ultracold atomic gases and can be employed for a great variety of experiments, e.g., on quantum phe- nomena, precision measurements, ultracold collisions and quantum gases [1]. Optical dipole traps have opened up fascinating new experimental possibilities not offered by other trapping methods. A very important advantage compared with magnetic traps is the fact that a dipole trap can store atoms in any sub-state or mixtures of sub-states of the electronic ground state. Because of the unusual scattering prop- erties of cesium the use of an optical dipole trap may be the only way to achieve Bose-Einstein condensation of this interesting atomic species. For Cs the quantum- mechanical scattering is resonantly enhanced [2, 3], and binary collisions flipping the spin state lead to severe loss from magnetic traps [4, 5, 6, 7]. The latter effect, which has been explained by resonant scattering in combination with a second-order spin-orbit coupling [8, 9], has so far prevented the attainment of a quantum-degenerate gas of cesium atoms. Inelastic two-body collisions are energetically sup- pressed in the absolute internal ground state of cesium, which is the high-field seeking state F= 3, mF= 3. Atoms in this state cannot be trapped magnetically but in an optical trap. In recent experiments, Vuletic et al. have discovered a low-field Feshbach resonance [10], which promises an easy experimental way to tune the s- wave scattering length in a wide range. With magnetic fields between 17G and 30G a positive scattering length should allow for a stable Bose-Einstein condensate. In our experiments to explore the quantum gas prop- ∗Present address: Physikalisches Institut, Heidelberg Uni versity, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. †Present address: Interdisziplin¨ ares Institut f¨ ur Umwel t¨ okonomie, Heidelberg University, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. ‡Present address: Bordeaux University, 33405 Talence, Fran ce.erties of cesium, we use the gravito-optical surface trap (GOST) [11]. This optical dipole trap allows one to con- fine a large sample of atoms in an almost conservative environment with very efficient precooling by a Sisyphus- type mechanism. In a second stage, evaporative cooling is implemented to further increase the atomic phase-space density. In this article, we summarize the basic prop- erties of the GOST (Sec. II) and discuss the limitations of optical cooling at high densities (Sec. III). We then report our first evaporative cooling results (Sec. IV) and discuss the prospects of future experiments (Sec. V). II. GRAVITO-OPTICAL SURFACE TRAP A. Trapping potential and general properties A schematic overview of the geometry of the trap is given in figure 1. The GOST is an “optical mug”, whose bottom consists of an evanescent-wave (EW) atom mirror generated by total internal reflection of a blue-detuned laser beam from the surface of a prism, while the walls are formed by an intense hollow beam (HB) which passes vertically through the prism surface. The steep exponential decay of the EW intensity along the vertical direction and the sharp focussing of the hol- low beam lead to large intensity gradients and thus in combination with the blue detuning of both light fields to a strong repulsive dipole force. We exploit this fact to efficiently keep the atoms in the dark inner region of the trap where the unwanted effect of heating through scattering of trapping light photons is suppressed. In ad- dition to that, the concept also features a large trapping volume which allows for a transfer of a large number of atoms into the GOST. Due to the accurate focussing of the hollow laser beam into a ring-shaped intensity pro- file [12], the shape of the potential is box-like along the horizontal directions whereas the combination of gravity and the repulsive wall of the EW leads to a wedge-shaped potential vertically. In thermal equilibrium this geometry allows for a sim- ple description of the ensemble. The vertical density pro-2 EW laserrepumping beamatoms in MOT atoms in GOSTbeam prism hollow beam FIG. 1: Illustration of the gravito-optical surface trap. file is given by the “barometric” equation n(z) =n0exp(−z/z0) (1) with n0being the peak number density and z0= kBT/mg the 1/e-height of the sample. mdenotes the mass of the cesium atom, gthe gravitational accelera- tion,zthe vertical coordinate and Tthe temperature. Assuming a homogeneous horizontal density distribution within the hollow beam radius rHBthis expression can be integrated to express the peak density n0in terms of the atom number Nand the temperature T, n0=mg πr2 HBkBN T. (2) The mean density ¯ ndefined as ¯n≡1 N/integraldisplay d3r n2(r) (3) is exactly half of the peak density (¯ n=n0/2). In the GOST potential the scaling of density with temperature (n∝T−1) is somewhat less as compared to a 3D har- monic oscillator where n∝T−3/2. The mean energy per atom is ¯E= 5/2kBT, of which 3/2kBTare kinetic energy and one kBTpotential energy in the vertical gravitational field, as can be obtained us- ing the Virial theorem. In the horizontal degree of free- dom the box form of the confining potential leads to neg- ligible potential energy. While the horizontal extension of the sample is deter- mined by the diameter of the hollow beam (2 rHB), the height is proportional to the ensemble temperature with a constant of proportionality of 6.4 µm/µK. At typical equilibrium temperatures of a few µK the 1 /e-height is on the order of a few ten µm thus leading to a highly anisotropic “pancake-shape” of the ensemble.B. Experimental realization The experimental constituents of the GOST are the evanescent-wave diode laser, a titanium:sapphire laser to create the hollow beam and an additional diode laser to provide the light for the repumping beam. For EW and repumping beam we use laser diodes (SDL-5712-H1, dis- tributed Bragg reflector), which yield up to 100mW of ra- diation at the cesium D 2-line at a wavelength of 852nm. The EW laser is focussed to provide a round spot on the surface of the prism with a 1 /e2-radius of 540 µm. The angle of incidence is θ= 45.6◦which is 2◦above the critical angle of 43 .6◦. This leads to a 1 /e2decay length of Λ = ( λ/2π)(n2sin2θ−1)−1/2≈500nm, where n= 1.45 is the refractive index of the fused-silica prism. The EW detuning δEWis between a few GHz during optical Sisyphus cooling and up to 300GHz in the process of evaporative cooling. Since atoms are predominantly kept in the lower hyperfine ground state ( F=3) in the dipole trap, all detunings given throughout this paper refer to the transition between this state and the center of the2P3/2excited-state manifold. AtδEW/2π= 3GHz and a power of 45mW the EW creates a repulsive optical potential with a height of ∼1mK. The potential barrier is reduced by typically a factor of two by the attractive van-der-Waals interaction between the atoms and the dielectric surface [13]. The hollow beam is generated using an axicon optics [12] to create a ring-shaped focus of an inner and outer 1/e-radius of rHB= 260 µm and rHB+∆rHB= 290 µm, respectively. It has a power of 350mW and its detuning is in the range between −0.3nm and −2nm. The HB provides a potential barrier on the order of 100 µK height. At this detuning the HB potential is almost conservative as the photon scattering rates can be estimated to be on the order of a few photons up to a few ten photons per second. The repumping beam needed for the optical Sisyphus cooling [14] is resonant with the F= 4→F′= 4 hyper- fine transition of the D2-line and has an intensity on the order of 1 µW/cm2. It is shone on the trapping region from above (see fig. 1). C. Loading of the trap The loading scheme of the GOST goes along standard ways starting from an effusive atomic beam which is de- celerated by a Zeeman slower [15]. A magneto-optical trap (MOT) collects about 3 ×108atoms under ultra- high vacuum conditions ( ∼10−11mbar). The sample is then cooled to ∼10µK and spatially compressed using a polarization gradient cooling scheme, in which the MOT laser detuning is increased within 50ms from 3Γ to 14Γ; here Γ /2π= 5.3 MHz denotes the natural linewidth. Af- ter the atomic cloud is shifted from its loading position (3mm above the surface) to a release position (0.5mm) close to the evanescent wave using magnetic offset fields,3 the MOT-laser beams are shuttered and the atoms fall onto the EW-light sheet. As soon as the near-resonant light fields of the MOT are switched off, the repumping beam of the GOST is turned on to optically pump the atoms into the lower hyperfine state ( F=3), and the Sisy- phus cooling in the GOST starts. Initially up to 2 ×107 atoms are transfered into the dipole trap and undergo optical cooling. The number of atoms Nremaining in the GOST after a variable storage time is measured by recapturing them into the MOT and taking a fluorescence picture using a slow-scan CCD camera. The integrated fluorescence signal, calibrated with a more accurate absorption image of the MOT, allows us to determine Nwith an estimated uncertainty of less than 50%. III. OPTICAL COOLING AT HIGH DENSITIES Here we discuss the efficient EW Sisyphus cooling mechanism and its role as optical precooling stage for evaporative cooling in the GOST. We present our obser- vations of density-dependent effects that limit EW cool- ing, namely an excess temperature and trap loss due to ultracold collisions in the presence of blue-detuned light . A. Evanescent-wave Sisyphus cooling The optical cooling process is based on inelastic reflec- tions of the repeatedly bouncing cesium atoms from the evanescent wave [14, 16]. In the great majority of the bounces the atoms are coherently reflected in the lower hyperfine state ( F=3) without any dissipation of kinetic energy or heating. However, occasionally the absorption of an EW photon takes place and the subsequent spon- taneous decay will either have the atom end up in the F=3- or the F=4 hyperfine state. A decay into the up- per hyperfine state occurs with a branching ratio of q= 0.25 and due to the reduced dipole force on this state will lead to a weaker repulsion of the atom from the EW and thereby to a damping of the vertical motion. Af- ter leaving the EW the atom is optically pumped back into the lower hyperfine state. Simple considerations on the balance of cooling through this process and heating due to photon scattering lead to an expression for the equilibrium temperature: T=/parenleftbigg1 q+1 qr/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg 1 +δEW δHFS/parenrightbigg Trec. (4) The first term in brackets represents the average number of photons scattered per cooling reflection. qr= 5/12 denotes the branching ratio of the decay of the F’=4 excited state into the F=3 ground state. δEWis the detuning of the evanescent wave and δHFS= 2π×9.2GHz the hyperfine splitting of the ground state. Trec= 200 nK is the recoil temperature of cesium. The experimental parameters yield a cooling limit of slightly less than 2 µK.µ T = (2 + 0.1) K T = (2 + 0.1) K µv h (ms) ∆HBt ∆ (ms) tEW FIG. 2: Measurement of the equilibrium temperature for 2.5×104trapped atoms at a large HB detuning of 2 nm. The employed release-and-recapture method allows to determin e the horizontal and vertical temperatures ThandTvseparately. This is accomplished by switching off either the EW or the HB for a short time interval ∆ tEWor ∆tEW, respectively, and measuring the corresponding loss of atoms. Under equi- librium conditions the sample has an isotropic temperature , which in this case ( T= 2.0µK) is very close to the theoretical cooling limit of EW Sisyphus cooling. These considerations are consistent with observed tem- peratures of 2.0 µK in small samples ( N<∼105atoms) at large hollow beam detunings (see figure 2). Dense sam- ples with N≫105atoms show an excess temperature as will be discussed in the following section. The time scale on which the cooling process takes place is on the order of one second – considerably longer than in a MOT. Theoretical considerations on the cooling dy- namics [14] predict an exponential drop of the vertical temperature in the beginning of the cooling process with a rate constant β=q 3δHFS δEWmgΛ ¯h(δEW+δHFS)Γ. (5) AtδEW= 2π×3GHz we find β= 1.1s−1. Cooling of the horizontal motion is facilitated through mixing of the vertical and the horizontal degrees of free- dom by either diffuse reflection of atoms from the EW [11, 17] or in the case of dense samples by elastic colli- sions. Right after the transfer from the MOT into the GOST, the potential energy from the fall is gradually converted into thermal energy and leads to a very hot (∼100µK) sample after thermalization within ∼0.5 s. The few seconds it takes for the ensemble to reach the equilibrium temperature are consistent with the calcu- lated cooling rate. To measure temperatures we use a release-and- recapture method which is accomplished by turning off the EW-potential for a short duration (few milliseconds) and measuring the remaining fraction of atoms as a func- tion of this release time. A fit of a theoretical model to the data which is based on a Boltzmann distribution [15], yields Tas the only fit parameter. Under the con- ditions of the experiments reported here the sample is almost thermalized at any time, so that separate mea-4 0 1 2 3 4024681012 temperature ( µK) number of atoms (106) FIG. 3: Equilibrium temperature versus atom number for δEW/2π= 6GHz and a HB detuning of 0.3 nm. The solid line represents a linear fit to the experimental data (dots). The dashed line indicates the resulting limit temperature f or very low densities. surements of the horizontal temperature were not rou- tinely performed. B. Excess temperature in dense samples Measurements of Tin large atomic samples yield signif- icantly higher temperatures ( ∼10µK) compared to what we found in earlier experiments on small samples [11]. It turns out that the equilibrium temperature of EW Sisyphus cooling depends critically on the number of trapped atoms. Figure 3 shows the strong dependence ofTon atom number for typical operating conditions of the GOST. The data is reasonably described by a linear dependence T=T0+aN , (6) where T0= 4.5µK is the limit temperature achieved in small samples and a= 1.5µK/(106atoms) the slope. The limit temperature T0can be reduced close to the EW Sisyphus cooling limit (see eq. 4) by increasing the de- tuning of the hollow beam (see figure 2), which is easily explained by heating due to photon scattering. However at large detunings it is not possible to transfer large num- bers of atoms into the GOST so that one has to find a compromise between appreciable atom number and low temperature. The excess temperature as observed in large sam- ples indicates the presence of multiple photon scattering. Similar observations are made in experiments on “gray molasses” where one also keeps the atoms predominantly in the F= 3 ground state [18]. We find that the slope adecreases with increasing HB detuning. It is however not obvious that this excess heating solely depends on the hollow beam. The repumping beam of EW Sisyphus cooling is likely to contribute to this effect.In a new experimental setup, in which the HB optics was substantially improved to provide aberration-free fo- cussing [19], we are now able to trap 107atoms at a HB detuning of 1nm and achieve a temperature of ∼10µK. This is better by a roughly a factor of two as compared to the conditions of the reported experiments. The im- proved setup was used for the evaporation experiments in Sec. IV. C. Binary collisions in a blue-detuned light field Lifetimes of samples of more than 106atoms were found to be on the order of 5 to 10 seconds and clearly indicated the presence of a strong nonexponential con- tribution to the decay (see figure III C). We model the decay assuming the presence of a two-body loss process in the standard loss rate equation [20] ˙N=−αN−β¯nN . (7) To solve this equation one has to consider the complete dependence of the mean density ¯ non the atom number N, which is also influenced by the observed excess tem- perature. Since cooling and thermalization takes place on a time scale much shorter than the decay one can as- sume stationary conditions for T(N) according to eq. 6. Using this and equation 2 one obtains ¯n=mg 2πr2 HBkBN T0+aN. (8) Solving the differential equation one can almost perfectly fit the experimental data and extract the quadratic loss coefficient βas a fit parameter. Figure III C demon- strates the good agreement between the model and the measurement. We find βto be on the order of 10−12cm3/s, which is about an order of magnitude less as compared to radiative escape in a MOT [20]. A possible mechanism for the observed loss is based on the excitation of a pair of colliding cesium atoms into a repulsive molecular state [21, 22, 23, 24]. The reso- nant dipole-dipole interaction splits the excited molecu- lar state into an attractive and a repulsive branch. While the attractive branch gives rise to loss processes like ra- diative escape and photoassociation in red-detuned light, the repulsive branch becomes relevant in blue-detuned light. When a cesium pair is excited into a repulsive molecular state at the classical Condon point it is accel- erated along the potential curve and obtains a kinetic en- ergy equivalent to the detuning of the exciting light field with respect to the atomic transition. For a dipole trap the resulting energy gain is in general much larger than the trap depth and leads to an ejection of both colliding atoms from the trap. According to a simple semi-classical model the corresponding rate coefficient βshould scale with the laser detuning and intensity as I/δ2as long as the intensity is low enough to avoid optical shielding ef- fects [21].5 0 5 10 15 20 25106107 number of atoms N storage time (s) FIG. 4: Decay of the number of trapped atoms with increasing storage time under the same experimental conditions as in fig. 3. The measured data points (dots) are well fitted by a theoretical model that takes into account loss due to binary collisions. The fit (solid line) yields α= 0.03 s−1andβ= 0.9×10−12cm3/s for the rate coefficients. In a first set of measurements to investigate this loss process we obtained decay curves at different detun- ings of the EW-laser field and extracted the rate coef- ficient β. In a gravito-optical trap the mean EW dipole potential experienced by the bouncing atoms is given by¯Udip=mgΛ/2, independent of intensity and de- tuning. Therefore the mean intensity ¯Ito which an atom is exposed is proportional to the detuning δEW. Thus the expected scaling of the rate coefficient is β∝ ¯I/δ2 EW∝1/δEW. Measurements in the detuning range between 1GHz and 7GHz [25] indeed showed the ex- pected 1 /δEW-behaviour. This confirms that collisions in the evanescent wave can explain the observed loss. As a practical consequence of this fact we can minimize trap loss during optical cooling by switching the EW de- tuning to higher values shortly after loading. Only in the initial cooling phase low detuning is required to provide a sufficiently large potential barrier. Therefore, in exper- iments aiming at high densities, the detuning is routinely switched from 3GHz to about 7GHz after 0.5s. To prove that excitation into repulsive molecular states leads to trap loss we use an additional blue-detuned “catalysis” laser to induce collisional trap loss. In this way this process can be studied independently of the pa- rameters of the trapping potential. The rate coefficient βcatwas measured for different values of detuning and in- tensity of the catalysis laser. In additional temperature measurements we ensured that heating due to photon scattering from the catalysis laser was negligible for all combinations of intensity and detuning. Data was col- lected at different catalysis laser intensities. The result s forβcatshown in figure 5 agree with the expected scaling behaviour I/δ2. As an important conclusion of these results, trap loss by binary collisions involving repulsive excited molecula r0 20 40 60 80012 I = 2 mW/mm2 10 mW/mm2 36 mW/mm2 βcat I0/I (10-12cm3/s) detuning (GHz) FIG. 5: Rate coefficient βcatdescribing the loss induced by an additional, blue-detuned “catalysis” laser. The experime ntal data are taken for three different intensities and, in order t o check the expected proportionality to I/δ2, are scaled to the lowest intensity I0= 2 mW/cm2. The resulting 1 /δ2-behavior is indicated by the solid fit curve. The deviations of some data around 20 GHz is likely due to drifts of the experimental conditions. states plays a significant role in optical cooling. Never- theless, a dense sample of many atoms at high densities can prepared. If the evanescent wave is then operated at very large detunings, a conservative trapping potential is obtained with very low photon scattering and strongly suppressed trap loss, i.e. a very good starting point for evaporative cooling. IV. EVAPORATIVE COOLING The GOST offers favorable conditions to implement forced evaporative cooling [26] with the prospect to at- tain quantum-degeneracy of cesium or a two-dimensional quantum gas. In contrast to red-detuned dipole traps used for evaporation experiments [27, 28], the spatial compression of the cold sample essentially results from gravity and is thus not affected when the optical poten- tials are ramped down. Moreover, many more atoms are initially loaded into the GOST as compared to typical red-detuned traps. Here we describe our first experi- ments demonstrating the feasibility of efficient evapora- tion in the GOST. In our evaporation experiments we operate the trap at a HB detuning of −1nm and keep the EW param- eters as in the measurements described above. In two seconds of optical cooling we prepare N= 107atoms at a temperature of T= 10µK, and a peak density of n0= 6×1011cm−3. For the unpolarized sample in the seven- fold degenerate F= 3 ground state this corresponds to a peak phase-space density of D=n0λ3 dB/7≈10−5 where λdB=h/√2πmk BTis the thermal de-Broglie wavelength. Elastic collisions take place at a rate on6 1 2 3 4 5 6 710-510-410-3phase-space density D number density n0 (cm-3) time (s)1010101110121013 (b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7104105106107temperature T (µK) number of atoms N time (s)0,1110(a) FIG. 6: Evaporative cooling in the GOST. The detuning ramp of the EW starts after two seconds of optical cooling and ends 4.5 s later, as indicated by the vertical dashed lines. T he evolution of the number Nand the temperature Tof the trapped atoms is shown in (a), the corresponding behavior of peak density n0∝N/Tand phase-space density D∝N/T5/2 is displayed in (b). the order of 50s−1and, considering the resonant scatter- ing of cesium [2], lead to a thermalization time of about 200ms. To implement forced evaporation we lower the EW po- tential by ramping up the EW detuning. This simultane- ously reduces heating due to photon scattering and sup- presses loss through the collision mechanism described above. Within 4 .5 seconds the EW detuning is increased exponentially from initially 7GHz up to 250GHz. This is accomplished by rapid mode-hop free temperature tun- ing of the EW diode laser. In the last 2 .5 seconds of the evaporation ramp the intensity of the hollow beam is re- duced from 350 mW to 11 mW in order to reduce possible heating by residual light in the dark center of the hollow beam. The contribution of the HB potential ramp to the evaporation remains very small. The experimental results are shown in figure 6. About 1s after starting the exponential ramp, the temperature begins to drop [filled squares in (a)]. At the end of the ramp, it has reached T≈300nK. This decrease of Tby about 1.5 orders of magnitude is accompanied by a de- crease of the particle number N[open triangles in (a)] from 107down to ∼3×104, i.e. about 2.5 orders of mag-nitude. Although the number density n0∝N/T [open cir- cles in (b)] decreases by about one order of magnitude, the phase-space density D∝n0T−3/2∝NT−5/2[filled squares in (b)] shows a substantial increase by 1.5 or- ders of magnitude. At the end of the ramp, we obtain a phase-space density of ∼3×10−4. In the regime of resonant elastic scattering ( T>∼1µK [3]), the relevant cross section scales ∝T−1. In the GOST potential, this leads to a scaling of the elastic scat- tering rate and the thermal relaxation rate ∝NT−3/2. Therefore the elastic scattering rate is almost constant for the conditions of our experiments. However, no run- away regime is reached. An obvious problem in our evaporation scheme is that, for the applied exponential ramp, it takes about one sec- ond until the EW potential barrier becomes low enough to start the evaporation. Up to this point already about 50% of the particles are lost, presumably by the colli- sional mechanism investigated in Sec. III C. After the corresponding initial loss of phase-space density the late r evaporation then leads to a gain of almost two orders of magnitude. This clearly shows that the potential of evap- orative cooling in the GOST is much larger than we could demonstrate in our first experiments discussed here. Although the reported evaporation results are still quite preliminary they already show that efficient evap- oration is attainable in the GOST by ramping down the optical trapping potential. Substantial improvements can be expected by an optimized evaporation ramp of the EW in combination with a simultaneous evaporation through the hollow-beam potential. V. CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK We have investigated optical and evaporative cooling in the gravito-optical surface trap. At high densities, optic al cooling by inelastic reflections from the evanescent-wave bottom of the trap was found to be limited by an excess temperature, which we interpret as a result of multiple photon scattering. In addition, a loss process is induced by the blue-detuned trap light. Colliding atoms are ex- cited into a repulsive molecular state which is followed by an energy release into the relative motion. Nevertheless, very good starting conditions are obtained for evapora- tive cooling. By reducing the trapping potentials we have cooled the sample down to a temperature of 300nK and obtained a phase-space of 3 ×10−4. So far all our evaporation experiments have been per- formed with unpolarized atoms in the seven-fold degen- erate F= 3 ground state. Dramatic improvements can be expected by polarizing the atoms into the absolute ground state F= 3, mF= 3. The phase-space density can be increased by a factor of seven, and by produc- ing identical bosons the elastic collsion rate goes up by nearly a factor of two. Moreover, Feshbach tuning can be applied to modify the s-wave scattering length [10].7 We have already performed first experiments, in which we have demonstrated that atoms the GOST can be op- tically pumped into the state of interest [29]. The spatial compression of the atomic gas can be en- hanced by adding a far red-detuned laser beam to the GOST. If such a beam propagates vertically in the cen- ter of the hollow beam it provides an additional potential well for transverse confinement. As an example, a 500- mW beam from a compact Nd:YAG laser focused to a 1/e-diameter of 0.1mm already provides a dipole poten- tialUredof∼3µK depth. In the GOST such an additional well can be loaded by elastic collisions, which in thermal equilibrium would result in a peak density enhancement of exp( |Ured|/kBT) along with a corresponding increase in phase-space density [30]. Another interesting option with an additional far red- detuned laser beam is to create a double-EW trap as suggested in Ref. [31]. The combination of a repulsive blue-detuned EW in combination with an attractive red- detuned EW of much larger decay length would allow to create a wavelength-size potential well very close to the dielectric surface. In such a scheme, a situation can berealized where only one vertical bound state exist. The situation would then be similar to atomic hydrogen on liquid helium, for which a two-dimensional quantum gas has been reported [32]. The realization of such a system with alkali atoms could provide much more insight into the physical behavior of such a 2D gas. In addition to such experiments on quantum gas prop- erties, the GOST also represents a very promising source of ultracold atoms for experiments related to, e.g., atom interferometry [33], atom-surface interactions [34, 35], and quantum chaos [36]. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungs- gemeinschaft in the frame of the Gerhard-Hess- Programm. We thank D. Schwalm for continuous sup- port and encouragement. One of us (V.D.) acknowledges a fellowship by the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. [1] R. Grimm, M. Weidem¨ uller, and Yu.B. Ovchinnikov, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 95 (2000). [2] M. Arndt, M. Ben Dahan, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, M. Reynolds, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 625 (1997). [3] S.A. Hopkins, S. Webster, J. Arlt, P. Bance, S. Cornish, O. Marago, and C.J. Foot, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032707 (2000). [4] J. S¨ oding, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, P. Desbiolles, G. Ferrari , and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1869 (1998). [5] J. Arlt, P. Bance, S. Hopkins, J. Martin, S. Webster, A. Wilson, K. Zetie, and C.J. Foot, J. Phys. B 31, L321 (1998). [6] D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, J. S¨ oding, P. Desbiolles, and J. Dal- ibard, Opt. Express 2, 323 (1998). [7] D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, J. S¨ oding, P. Desbiolles, and J. Dal- ibard, Europhys. Lett. 44, 25 (1998). [8] S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, B.J. Verhaar, and K. Gibble, Phys. Ref. Lett. 81, 951 (1998). [9] P.J. Leo, E. Tiesinga, P.S. Julienne, D.K. Walter, S. Kadlecek, and T.G. Walker, Phys. Ref. Lett. 81, 1389 (1998). [10] V. Vuletic, A.J. Kerman, C. Chin, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1406 (1999). [11] Yu.B. Ovchinnikov, I. Manek, and R. Grimm, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2225 (1997). [12] I. Manek, Yu.B. Ovchinnikov, and R. Grimm, Opt. Comm. 147, 67 (1998). [13] A. Landragin, J.-Y. Courtois, G. Labeyrie, N. Vansteenkiste, C.I. Westbrook, and A. Aspect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1464 (1996). [14] J. S¨ oding, R. Grimm, and Yu.B. Ovchinnikov, Opt. Comm. 119, 652 (1995). [15] I. Manek, doctoral thesis, Univ. Heidelberg 1999; Max- Planck-Institut f¨ ur Kernphysik report MPIH-V9-1999,(1999). [16] P. Desbiolles, M. Arndt, P. Szriftgiser, and J. Dalibar d, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4292 (1996). [17] A. Landragin, G. Labeyrie, C. Henkel, R. Kaiser, N. Vansteenkiste, C.I. Westbrook, and A. Aspect, Opt. Lett. 21, 1591 (1996). [18] D. Boiron, A. Michaud, P. Lemonde, Y. Castin, C. Sa- lomon, S. Weyers, K. Szymaniec, L. Cognet, and A. Cla- iron, Phys. Rev. A 53, R3734 (1996). [19] D. Rychtarik, diploma thesis, Univ. Heidelberg 2000; Max-Planck-Institut f¨ ur Kernphysik report MPI H - V 9, (2000). [20] J. Weiner, V.S. Bagnato, S. Zilio, and P.S. Julienne, Re v. Mod. Phys. 71, 1 (1999). [21] S. Bali, D. Hoffman, and T. Walker, Europhys. Lett. 27, 273 (1994). [22] D. Hoffman, S. Bali, and T. Walker, Phys. Rev. A, 54, R1030 (1996). [23] K. Burnett, P.S. Julienne, and K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1416 (1996). [24] V. Vuletic, C. Chin, A.J. Kerman, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 943 (1999). [25] M. Hammes, diploma thesis, Univ. Heidelberg 1999; Max-Planck-Institut f¨ ur Kernphysik report MPI H - V 24, (1999). [26] W. Ketterle and N.J. van Druten, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.37, 181 (1996). [27] C.S. Adams, H.J. Lee, N. Davidson, M. Kasevich, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3577 (1995). [28] H. Engler, T. Weber, M. Mudrich, R. Grimm, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Phys. Rev. A, in press; preprint physics/0003075. [29] For optical Zeeman pumping we use a weak circulary polarized beam resonant with the F= 3→F′= 3 transition and aligned parallel to a static magnetic field8 of a few Gauss. In addition the usual GOST repumping light with mixed polarization provides hyperfine repump- ing via the F= 4→F′= 4 transition. In this scheme the state of interest ( F= 3, mF= 3) is the only dark state and thus efficiently populated. In a Hanle-type ex- periment [19] we have observed that the pumping beams lead to very weak heating in the presence of the longi- tudinal magnetic field. With a transverse magnetic field destroying the dark state, strong heating was observed. This confirms the predominant population of the dark state. [30] D.M. Stamper-Kurn, H.-J. Miesner, A.P. Chikkatur, S. Inouye, J. Stenger, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2194 (1998).[31] Yu.B. Ovchinnikov, S.V. Shul’ga and V.I. Balykin, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 24, 3173 (1991). [32] A.I. Safonov, S.A. Vasilyev, I.S. Yashnikov, I.I. Luka she- vich, and S. Jaakkola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4545 (1998). [33] P. Szriftgiser, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, M. Arndt, and J. Dal- ibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4 (1996). [34] R. Cˆ ot´ e, B. Segev, and M.G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3999 (1998). [35] R. Marani, L. Cognet, V. Savalli, N. Westbrook, C.I. Westbrook, and A. Aspect, Phys. Rev. A 61, 053402 (2000). [36] F. Saif, B. Bialynicki-Birula, M. Fortunato, and W.P. Schleich, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4779 (1998).

arXiv:physics/0005036v1 [physics.chem-ph] 15 May 2000A Hybrid Algebraic/Schr¨ odinger Approach to the 2D Franck-Condon Problem Michael W.N. Ibrahim Center for Theoretical Physics, Sloane Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520–8120 Abstract We use recent results regarding the geometry of the U(3) bosonic algebraic model to motivate a hybrid algebraic-Schr¨ odinger approach to the 2 D Franck-Condon problem anal- ogous to 1D approaches. This approach allows one to analyze b ent to linear Franck-Condon transitions of triatomic molecules as well as clarifies the a ngular momentum dependance of the Franck-Condon intensities. 1 Introduction The study of transition amplitudes for molecules with initi al and final states given by differ- ent electronic configurations has held great interest. In th e Franck-Condon limit one models the two configurations by similar effective potentials with d ifferent geometric parameters. The transition intensities are then given by the wavefuncti on overlap of the two potentials (sudden approximation) [1]. Recently, the Franck-Condon (FC) problem of polyatomic mol ecules has been made tractable by the introduction of a hybrid algebraic-Schr¨ o dinger approach [2–4]. In this approach a spectrum generating algebra of U1(2)× · · ·×Uk(2) (where there are kbonds) is used to obtain wavefunctions [5] |ψ∝angbracketright=/summationdisplay i1,...,ikci1,...,ik|[N1],i1∝angbracketright ⊗ · · · ⊗ | [Nk],ik∝angbracketright, (1.1) by fitting spectra of a molecule in a particular configuration . In general for the two different configurations the ith bond contribution could change from the representation [ Ni] to [N′ i]. The Franck-Condon factors for the polyatomic case are reali zed in terms of the single bond factors by calculating the matrix element ∝angbracketleftψ′|ˆU|ψ∝angbracketright[2,3], where ˆU=ˆt(α1 α′ 1,∆1)⊗ · · · ⊗ ˆt(αk α′ k,∆k) (1.2) and the operator ˆtis defined by its matrix elements as determined by Schr¨ oding er overlaps: ∝angbracketleft[N′],n′|ˆt(¯α ¯α′,∆)|[N],n∝angbracketright=/integraldisplay dxψN′ n′(¯α′;x)ψN n(¯α;x−∆). (1.3) 1The parametersα α′and ∆ are typically fit from transition spectra. Due to the U(2)⊃O(2) chain’s correspondence with a Morse oscillator [6] one ofte n uses Morse eigenfunctions with anharmonicity parameter1 N+1for Schr¨ odinger wavefunctions. It is worth noting that the heuristic approximation in [2] showed that this can be equiv alently thought of as simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) overlaps where the scale paramet ers acquire a linear ndependent correction with coefficient O(1/N). That is, one would use the equation for the overlap of SHO wavefunctions, which has no Ndependence, and substitute a scale α=α0(1−ξ(n+1 2)). α0was taken as the scale of the SHO best approximating the Morse andξisO(1/N). In this way one introduces geometric parameters not contained in the algebra. Although this approach has been successful it necessitates that the initial and final configurations not be too dissimilar—in particular they mus t have the same normal mode expansion. This precludes, for example, a transition betwe en a linear and bent triatomic molecule (Figure 1). In the linear configuration the center a tom has two normal modes. In the bent configuration one of the normal mode solutions is spu rious—corresponding to an overall rotational degree of freedom. Because of this, the t reatment of vibrational modes in each configuration necessitates the freezing of a differen t number of degrees of freedom, whereas when studying transitions between each configurati on one needs to have the same degrees active. One may attack this problem by using more complicated algebr aic models which have both geometries built in. In this way some parameters which b efore were artificially inserted through the hybrid method become natural—i.e. since they ar e built in the algebra they are determined by spectra and do not need to be fit with transit ion data. However, in these more complicated algebraic models, exact Schr¨ odinger correspon- dences don’t in general exist. Thus, this approach necessit ates an alternate interpretation of algebraic parameters as geometric, configuration space q uantities. Recently such an in- terpretation has been provided [7] by exploiting the many ap proximate correspondences between algebraic and Schr¨ odinger pictures. We use these r esults to develop a hybrid ap- proach for the bent to linear transitions in Figure 1. This is most easily done by using a spectrum generating algebra of U1(2)×U(3)×U2(2) (aU(2) for each bond and the U(3) for the two additional degrees of freedom of the center atom) . The FC transition operator would then be ˆU=ˆt1⊗ˆT⊗ˆt2, where ˆt1,ˆt2are defined by equation 1.3. It is the purpose of this publication to motivate the definition of ˆT(eqn. 3.5). We begin by demonstrating, via a coherent state limit analys is [9], that U(3) is an ap- propriate algebra to describe the degrees of freedom of the c enter atom of the triatomic. We proceed with numerical studies to study the implications and discrepancies of this in- terpertation. Finally, we reconcile these discrepancies u sing [7] which naturally motivates our definition of ˆT. 2 The Franck-Condon Problem and U(3) 22.1 Overview of U(3)Statements on 2D Problem Th algebraic approach for 2D problems was presented by [8]. O ne considers symmetric (bosonic) representations of u(3). There are two chains of interest: U(3)⊃U(2)⊃O(2) I U(3)⊃O(3)⊃O(2) II. (2.1) We use the same notation as [8] for the generators except chos e a different O(3) subgroup as explained in [7]. Please note that the O(3) group is a dynamical symmetry subgroup and does not have the interpretation of a rotation in configurati on space. The general Hamiltonian of the U(3) model is H=ǫˆn+δˆn(ˆn+ 1) +βˆl2−AˆW2, (2.2) whereǫ,δ, andAare taken as positive or 0. Setting A= 0 (ǫ=δ= 0) gives a Hamiltonian with dynamical symmetry I (II). The spectra for each dynamic symmetry may be determined from the well known solution to the branching problem for a sy mmetric representation of u(3) labelled by N(the eigenvalue of the u(3) Casimir ˆ n+ ˆns) [8]. The basis corresponding to chain I is labeled by the eigenvalues of the u(2) ando(2) Casimirs nandlrespectively. The basis corresponding to chain II is labeled by the o(3) Casimir’s eigenvalues, ω(ω+ 1), and again by l. The spectra of each chain led the authors of [8] to the interpr etation of each dynamical symmetry as an azimuthally symmetric potential with minimu m at 0 radius (chain I) and at non-zero radius (chain II). 2.2U(3)Coherent State Limit The interpretation of [8] is reaffirmed by simply studying the classical coherent state limit calculated in [7]. Taking the coherent state limit of the Hamiltonian 2.2, sett ing all momenta to zero and dropping additive constants one finds the potential in group coordinates [10] to be (up to a meaningless multiplicative factor): ˜Vcl(r) =η1 2r2+1 4r4(2.3) where η=ǫ+ 2δ+β−4A(N−1) (δ+ 4A)(N−1). (2.4) It is easy to compute the position of the potential minima rmin=/braceleftbigg0η≥0√−η η< 0. (2.5) 3Thus we find: ˜Vcl(rmin) =/braceleftbigg0η≥0 −1 4η2η<0. (2.6) That is we have a second-order phase transition at η= 0, or equivalently 4 A(N−1) = ǫ+ 2δ+β[11]. The exact same analysis may be carried out in projective coor dinates [10] revealing: ˜Vcl′(˜rmin) =/braceleftBigg0η≥1 −1 4(1−η)2 1+η′η <1, (2.7) where now η=(ǫ+ 2δ+β) 4A(N−1), η′=δ 4A, (2.8) and ˜r2 min=/braceleftBigg 0η≥1 1−η η+2η′+1η <1. (2.9) Thus we again find a second-order phase transition at 4 A(N−1) =ǫ+ 2δ+β. In either coordinates the potential minima moves from r= 0 (corresponding to a linear configuration) to r∝negationslash= 0 (corresponding to a bent configuration) at the critical po int. We conclude that the algebraic model is rich enough to include b oth geometries depicted in Figure 1. Algebraic Hamiltonians having nearly a U(2) dynamical symmetry correspond to the center atom in a linear triatomic, whereas those near the O(3) limit correspond to the center atom in a bent triatomic 2.3U(3)and Schr¨ odinger FC Connections The FC factor for the two configurations is easily studied fro m a Schr¨ odinger perspective. Assuming that, whatever the actual nature of the potentials , they may be approximated about their minima as harmonic we may numerically calculate the FC overlaps. The results of such a calculation are displayed in Figure 2. The paramete rs (Table 2) are chosen to be relevant to the bent to linear FC transition (1B2→Σ+ g) ofCS2. The frequency of the linear configuration was taken from reference [12]. The harmonic di stance scale,mω ¯h, was deduced by assuming the effective mass was that of the carbon nucleus. The radial displacement was deduced from the geometry of the bent configuration as pub lished in reference [13] assuming that the heavy ( S−S) axis was essentially stationary. The associated distance scale of the bent configuration was assumed to be the same as th e linear scale. Since CS2is a particularly shallow molecule we have included an addition al plot (Figure 3) to demonstrate the behavior for a larger radial displacement. If one models the potential as exactly harmonic the displace d oscillator potential has the idiosyncrasy of a ‘cusp’ at r= 0. This is of little concern since the effective poten- tial is dominated by the angular momentum barrier at this poi nt. Approximate analytic expressions may be obtained for this limit as detailed in App endix A. 4We wish to emphasize that although these graphs serve as a val id starting point for a more complete analysis of CS2transition intensities their primary purpose here is heuri stic. A full analysis requires a careful fitting of the bent configur ation distance scale. Additionally, the bending modes considered here are known to couple strong ly to symmetric stretching modes [12]—i.e. a full analysis would require coupling addi tionalU(2)’s as discussed in the introduction. One may consider more realistic bending potentials such as a P¨ oschl-Teller: V=V0/bracketleftBig 1−cosh−2¯α(r−r∗)/bracketrightBig . (2.10) In this case the cusp at the origin still exists for the displa ced oscillator (non-zero r∗) but is tamed due to the long distance flattening of the potential. In the limit where the minima is far from the origin the cusp essentially vanishes. Figure 3 shows numerical results for a P¨ oschl-Teller model of a bent to linear transition. The par ameters are chosen such that the the potentials are approximated to second order by exactly t he harmonic plots included in the same figure. That is, the harmonic distance scale, α4= 2mV0¯α2/¯h2is set to the same value as the SHO FC factors. The remaining parameter, taken a sα2 ¯α2, is a unitless measure of well depth. It was chosen to be sufficiently small to emphasi ze differences between the FC factors of the two potentials. The previous section’s analysis implies that the FC factors for a bent to linear con- figuration in the algebraic picture are given by exactly the i nner product of the algebraic wavefunctions for hamiltonians near the O(3) chain (bent configuration) and on the U(2) chain (linear configuration). The overlaps for several such ‘bent’ hamiltonians are given in Figure 4. The algebraic ‘bent’ hamiltonian was taken to be of the form H= (1−ξ)ˆn−ξ (N−1)ˆW2. (2.11) The parameter ξwas chosen to match the intensity maximum with that of severa l harmonic Schr¨ odinger calculations (corresponding to unitless rad ial displacements of 3, 5, and 7). The results of calculations for two significantly different irre ps., [N], are shown to emphasize that the structure is generic and not a function of any special cho ice of parameters. Comparing Figures 2–4 again reaffirms the interpretation of t he twoU(3) chains as bent and linear configurations of a 2D problem. Comparing the SHO a nd P¨ oschl-Teller figures one notes although not in exact agreement they are very simil ar given the large differences of the Schr¨ odinger potentials. Qualitatively the U(3) graphs also appear similar with the possible exceptions of (1) their (expected) truncation at h ighern; (2) their dramatically sharper peaks than the Schr¨ odinger FC graphs; (3) their amp litude’s diminished sensitivity to the amount of radial displacement. 2.4 Scale Changes The numerical study raises two questions (1) What are the rel ations between the algebraic parameters (determining the hamiltonian’s proximity to ei ther chain) and the Schr¨ odingers 5(more geometric) parameters? (2) Is there an interpretatio n for the apparent qualitative differences (the sharper peak) between the algebraic and Sch r¨ odinger pictures? Both these questions can be addressed by considering the res ults of [7]. The two relevant results, which we reproduce here, include the intrinsic dis tance scale of the harmonic approx- imation to a Hamiltonian near the O(3) limit and an expression for the radial displacement for the same Hamiltonian: α2≈2mωO(3) ¯h/bracketleftBigg 1 +X Z/parenleftBiggl2 N2−1/parenrightBigg −Y Z/parenleftBiggl2 N2+1 2/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg . (2.12) (r∗)2≈N¯h mωO(3)/parenleftBigg 1 +X Z(l2 (N¯h)2−1)−Y Z/parenrightBigg , (2.13) whereX=ǫ+ 2δ+β,Y=δ(N−1), andZ= 4A(N−1), and the condition that we are near the O(3) limit impliesX Zis small. The parameter mωhas the interpretation of the ratio of distance to momenta scales, i.e. mω= ¯α(mV0)1 2for a potential V=V0f(¯αx). Additionally the results of [7] imply that Hamiltonians fro m either dynamical symmetry not only correspond to different geometries as implied by 2.2 but additionaly to different intrinsic scales (see Appendix C): ζn=mωU(2) mωO(3)≈2 log 2 2−log 2/bracketleftBigg 1 +4 log 2(2 −log 2)/braceleftBigg3 2logN N+ (nlog log 2 +c)1 N/bracerightBigg/bracketrightBigg ,(2.14) c= log log 2 −log23 4 2−log 2(2.15) This implies that the algebraic overlap of a U(2) Hamiltonian with an O(3) one is not simply analogous to the overlap of radially displaced oscillators , but analagous to the matrix ele- ments of an operator which radially displaces anddilatates (much like the operator matrix elements calculated in [2]) changing the natural scale of th e problem. The degree of dilata- tion depends on the proximity of the second hamiltonian to ei ther chain. For chains near U(2) the dilatation paramater is essentially 1. As one moves n earer to the O(3) chain the dilatation parameter increases, approaching the value giv en by equation 2.14. This effect must be accounted for in any algebraic or hybrid approach to t he FC problem. We saw in the introduction that in the 1D problem the scale par ameters may have been thought as harmonic scale parameters with corrections line ar in the quantum number nof order 1/N. The scenario is similar here—except the quantum number is n ownand there are additional corrections of the larger order log N/N. 2.5 Schr¨ odinger and Algebraic Parameter Relations Equations 2.12 and 2.13 for the harmonic dilatation and radi al displacement establish the needed connection between algebraic and geometrical param eters—at least in the regime 6where we are near the O(3) limit. These quantities can be easily related to experim ental data. Experimentally one can find the lower energy level spacing ∆ Eexp, the reduced mass of the particle mexp, and from rotational spectra the distance of displacement rexp. In terms of these quantities one may compute the unitless distance us ing the harmonic oscillator dilatation α2 exp=mexp∆Eexp ¯h2. (2.16) Equatingα2 expr2 expwith the previous expressions ( α2r∗2given by 2.12 and 2.13) one finds 2N[1 + corrections] =mexp∆Eexp ¯h2r2 exp. (2.17) This could be very valuable when fitting spectra. Since the O(3) chain represents the ‘maximum’ radial displacement [7] this expression gives a l ower bound for N. One may begin fitting data for the Nwhich satisfies this equation with the corrections set equal to 0. If theO(3) chain spectra with this Ndoesn’t fit the experimental data then one can try higherNand move off the O(3) chain a corresponding amount so that the equation with the corrections is still satisfied. 3 2-D Franck-Condon Problem: The Prescription 3.1 Adding Dilatations We are now ready to develop a prescription for calculating th e FC factors for a U(3) algebraic model. We begin by considering the FC problem of two configura tions of a molecule both described by the U(2) chain—i.e. two linear triatomics. Following the 1D proc edure we propose a hybrid approach based upon calculating the matrix elements of the operator ˆT defined in terms of 2D SHO Schr¨ odinger overlaps: ∝angbracketleft[N′],n′,l|ˆT|[N],n,l∝angbracketright=Tn,n′,l(α α′) (3.1) The appropriate overlaps are calculated in Appendix D (equa tions D.3 and D.2). ˆTby construction does not connect subspaces of different l. 3.2 Final Procedure We have yet to add any dependance on the representation label N. One could add such dependance by hand, appealing to an analogy with the 1D case. However, when one has a bent to linear transition such an appeal is largely unnecess ary due to equation 2.14. For simplicity suppose we have a molecule with a bent configur ation whose spectra is fit by a hamiltonian of the O(3) chain in representation Nand a linear configuration whose spectra is fit by the U(2) dynamical symmetry with δ=β= 0 (in this scenario the second 7representation label N′can be arbitrary since the hamiltonian will generate identi cal low lying (experimentally measurable) spectra regardless of N′). Further, suppose the induced harmonic dilatations αandα′(given by equation 2.16) can be calculated. In this instance we know that expanding the O(3) basis in terms of the U(2) basis is equivalent to expanding in terms of a SHO with harmonic dilatation α2 U(2)=1 2ζnα2(whereζnis determined by 2.14). Thus the FC transitions should be the matrix elements: ∝angbracketleft[N′],n′,l|ˆT|[N],ω,l∝angbracketright, (3.2) where ˆTis defined by ∝angbracketleft[N′],n′,l|ˆT|[N],n,l∝angbracketright=Tn,n′,l α α′/radicalBigg 1 2ζn . (3.3) Expanding in large Nwe see/radicalBig 1 2ζn=a+bnfrom equation 2.14 where bisO(1 N) anda has constant contributions andlogN Ncontributions. With the exception that a∝negationslash= 1 this is exactly the correction one has in the 1D case. That is, we have just letα→α(a+bn). In this extreme case the FC factors can be calculated with no e xtra fitting parameters. However, our calculations depended on expansions in large N[7] and thus we would expect them to be inaccurate for larger n. This can be compensated for phenomelogically by allowingbto be fit to compensate for ignored terms. Although the above situation is only for a limiting case, the se results (along with insight from the 1D analysis) will imply exactly what will happen in o ther more realistic cases. •Bent configuration near the O(3)basis: One can in principle calculate the scale dependance near O(3):mω|OffO(3)≈mω|O(3)(1 +νX Z+µY Z) whereνandµwould have to be determined by repeating the calculation of [7] to s econd order. In such a calculation, it is clear that the result will go like α→α(˜a+˜bn+˜dl2), where ˜a=a(1 +γ) andγisO(X Z,Y Z);˜b=b(1 +γ′) andγ′isO(X Z,Y Z); the new parameter ˜d, introducing ldependence, is O(X ZN2,Y ZN2); and we have ignored a n-lcross term which is of a significantly smaller order. Although these coefficien ts could be calculated in principle, one must phenomenologically fit ˜band˜din order to describe higher states anyways. Since the ldependance is of lower order it seems likely that ˜dmay not even be calculable with todays data. •Linear configuration in U(2)basis but δ∝negationslash= 0:In this instance the u(2) requan- tization was approximate and inadequate for higher eigenst ates. However, compar- ing the spectra to a Dunham expansion one sees thatδ ǫplays the role of an anhar- monicity parameter (recall equation 2.2). Thus, from the 1D case one concludes that α′→α′(1 +b′(n+ 1)) where b′must be fit but should be of the order ofδ ǫ. •Either configuration far from both chains: Although our scheme has not allowed us to do explicit calculations in this regime, in terms of phe nomologically fit parameters the result should still be clear. One should replace the indu ced harmonic dilatation 8byα→α(˜a+˜b(n+1)+ ˜dl2). In this scenario ˜ ashould be between 1 and adepending on the proximity to either chain, ˜bhas contributions due to both δanharmonicities and theO(3) chain, and one again expects that ˜dis of significantly smaller order. In this regime all parameters must be fit to data. Let us recapitulate. The scheme we propose involves fitting t he spectra of each configu- ration of the molecule in a U(3) model to obtain wavefunctions |[N],ψE∝angbracketright,|[N′],ψ′ E′∝angbracketright. The FC factors are then ∝angbracketleft[N′],ψ′ E′|ˆT|[N],ψE∝angbracketright (3.4) where we define ˆTin terms of the U(2) basis: ∝angbracketleft[N′],n′,l′|ˆT|[N],n,l∝angbracketright=δl,l′Tn,n′,l/parenleftBiggα(˜a+˜b(n+ 1) + ˜dl2) α′(˜a′+˜b′(n′+ 1) + ˜d′l2)/parenrightBigg . (3.5) In general the parameters must be fit, but whenever any of the l imiting cases appear the appropriate theoretical values may be substituted. For exa mple, if the linear configuration is highly harmonic one has ˜ a′= 1 and ˜b′=˜d′= 0. Further, since we expect the l2dependance to be nearly negligible and we have a l=l′selection rule, we may expand and combine ˜d and˜d′into one parameter. Note that this scheme may also be used for bent to bent transit ions. This would be more useful than the 1D procedure [2,3] if one was interested in theldependance of the transitions for instance. 4 Conclusions Using the result of [7] involving the geometry and scales of t he dynamical symmetries of U(3) we have explained the difference one sees when considerin g FC overlaps as described by theU(3) algebra and FC overlaps as described by radially displac ed Schr¨ odinger oscillators. Additionally, the analysis has given us the practical resul t of a minimum value of Nas a function of simple experimentally measured quantities. We observed that this scale dependency leads very naturally to a description of two di- mensional FC factors. To compute the FC factors one expands t he algebraic wavefunction in theU(2) basis and formally replaces the basis element’s overlap by the 2D SHO Schr¨ odinger overlap. Corrections for N, anharmonicities, and even ldependance are made by letting the SHO dilatation constant have nandl2dependent contributions. The resulting formulas are analogous to the 1D results obtained by expanding in anha rmonicities. 5 Acknowledgements This work was performed in part under the U.S. Department of E nergy, Contract No. DE- FG02-91ER40608. I extend my deepest gratitude to my advisor , Prof. Franco Iachello, for introducing me to the FC problem, his suggestions and feedba ck on this work, and his useful 9comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. I am indebt ed to Thomas M¨ uller and Prof. Patrick Vaccaro for useful discussions regarding the statu s of experimental results on bent to linear FC transitions. Finally, I would like to thank the D epartment of Energy’s Institute for Nuclear Theory at the University of Washington for its ho spitality during the completion of this work. Appendices A Approximate Analytic Expressions for 2D FC over- laps A.1 Linear Configuration In the linear configuration in the harmonic limit one has, aft er separating out the azimuthal portion of the wavefunction, the equation: 1 rd dr/parenleftBigg rd drv(r)/parenrightBigg −l2 r2v(r) +/parenleftBig˜E−λ2r2/parenrightBig v(r) = 0, (A.1) whereλis related to the frequency of the oscillator by λ=mω ¯hand˜E=2m ¯h2E. Subject to the boundary conditions v(r)|r=∞= 0,rv(r)|r=0= 0 the solution is well known to be [14]: vnr,l(r) =/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt2nr!λ|l|+1 (|l|+nr)!r|l|e−λ 2r2L|l| nr(λr2), (A.2) with eigenvalue ˜E= 2λ(|l|+ 1 + 2nr). (A.3) A.2 Bent Configuration For a system w/ equilibrium located at some r=r0we again assume that for the lowest states the system is well approximated by a harmonic oscilla tor. Our wave equation is thus: 1 rd dr/parenleftBigg rd drv(r)/parenrightBigg −l2 r2v(r) +/parenleftBig˜E′−λ′2(r−r0)2/parenrightBig v(r) = 0. (A.4) Notice, that this mild transformation will greatly change t he form of the solutions (as opposed to the 1D case) since the laplacian is not invariant u nder radial displacements. Note that towards the origin the potential is ‘heightwise trunca ted’ (in full 2-space the potential is not differentiable at the origin). Thus, to harmonically a pproximate the potential we must assure that we are sufficiently far from the origin, i.e. l ooselyλ′r2 0must be large. 10To obtain approximate solutions to this bent configuration e quation we make the sub- stitutionv(r) =u(r)√r. Forl∝negationslash= 0 we may expand the effective potential about its minima r∗=r0/parenleftBig 1 +ǫ−3ǫ2+O(ǫ3)/parenrightBig (A.5) whereǫ=1 λ′2(l2−1 4)1 r4 0and our large r0condition is refined to 27r4 0>256 λ′2(l2−1 4). (A.6) Moving the left boundary condition from r= 0 tor=−∞only introduces O(ǫ) corrections so we may obtain a 1D SHO equation: −d2 dr2u(r) +/parenleftBig ∆ +¯λ2(r−r∗)2/parenrightBig u(r) =˜E′u(r). (A.7) where ∆ = r2 0λ′2(ǫ−ǫ2+O(ǫ3)) and ¯λ2=λ′2(1+3ǫ−12ǫ2+O(ǫ3)). Note that the ldependence of the solution is implicit to the behavior of ¯λ. We find that the actual wavefunction for the bent configuration is: vnr,l(r)≈¯λ1 4 (√π2nrnr!)1 2e−1 2¯λr2 √rHnr(/radicalBig ¯λ(r−r∗)). (A.8) Although this solution is singular at the origin this is of li ttle concern since the metric contains a factor of r(the real objects of interest are√rv(r), of which we have a good approximation). A.3 Franck-Condon Factors We wish to calculate the overlap of wavefunctions from a line ar and bent configuration. Given theSO(2) symmetry of both configurations the angular part of the wa vefunctions simply gives the δl,l′selection rule. Hence, the integral we wish to evaluate is Inr,n′r=Mn′r,lNnr,l/integraldisplay∞ 0drr|l|+1 2e−λ+¯λ 2r2L|l| nr(λr2)Hn′r(/radicalBig ¯λ(r−r∗)), (A.9) where we introduced the short hand MandNfor the normalizations. We remove all dimensionful quantities by making the change o f variableu=√ λr. Additionally we decide to work in the (realistic) domain whe reλ≈λ′by settingλ′ λ= 1 +δ whereδis small. Using expressions from [2] for the expansion Hs(α(x−x0)) =/summationdisplay 0≤n≤stn,s(α,−x0)Hn(x), (A.10) assumingδandǫare of the same order, and ignoring quadratic terms: Inr,n′r≈Mn′r,lNnr,l λ|l| 2+3 4 −2(l2−1 4)1 4 ǫ1 4 n′ r/integraldisplay∞ 0duu|l|+1 2e−u2L|l| nr(u2). (A.11) 11Not surprisingly the dominant term is independent of δ(reflecting the fact that FC integrals tend to be more sensitive to changes in displacement than to d ilatation). Evaluating the integral [15] and simplifying: Inr,n′r≈/parenleftBigg2n′ r 2√π(|l|+nr)!n′r!nr!/parenrightBigg1 2/parenleftBig −r0√ λ′/parenrightBign′ r/parenleftBigg|l| 2+1 4/parenrightBigg nrΓ/parenleftBigg|l| 2+3 4/parenrightBigg . (A.12) B Schr¨ odinger and Algebraic Quantum Numbers In the preceding sections for each l= 0,±1,±2...we have that nr= 0,1,2,...with the energy relation E∝ |l|+ 2nr. For theu(2) chain of the u(3) model with hamiltonian H=E0+kˆn(the algebraic model most similar to the 2D SHO) we have as a sp ectraE∝n. The branching rules imply that for each l= 0,±1,±2...we haven=|l|,|l|+ 2,|l|+ 4,.... Note that both the expressions for the spectra and the rules f or the ranges of the quantum numbers agree if we make the identification: nr=n− |l| 2. (B.1) Thus the wavefunction with lowest energy within a subspace o f givenlis labelled by nr= 0 in the Schr¨ odinger picture and n=|l|in the algebraic picture. C Scale Changes Our equation 2.14 differs from the results of [7] by the substi tution |l| →n. This difference occurs because [7] did not compute overlaps for higher energ y wavefunctions since its ap- proximation was most valid in the low energy limit. However, their requantization technique works exactly for all levels of the U(2) chain when δ= 0. We therefore may expect these higher energy wavefunctions to be more reliable and repeat t heir procedure to calculate the scale change for all levels in this larger domain. Proceedin g to do so one finds that the linear |l|dependance of equation 2.14 was an artifact of working in the ground state of each |l|subspace and the true correspondence has linear contributi ons appearing in n. D Schr¨ odinger FC Factors for dilatated r∗= 0Har- monic Potentials Using the solution to the radial part of the Schr¨ odinger equ ation for the 2D SHO stated in Appendix A the FC overlaps for a dilatated SHO become: 2/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbtnr!n′r! (λλ′)|l|+1 (|l|+nr)!(|l|+n′ r)!/integraldisplay∞ 0rdrr2|l|e−λ+λ′ 2r2L|l| nr(λr2)L|l| n′r(λ′r2). (D.1) 12The integral may be evaluated in terms of a hypergeometric fu nction [15] and simplified to: ISHO nr,n′r,l(λ,λ′) =/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt(λλ′)|l|+1nr!n′ r! (nr+|l|)! (n′r+|l|)!(−)nr/parenleftbigg2 λ+λ′/parenrightbigg|l|+1 (D.2) ×min(nr,n′ r)/summationdisplay m=0(−)m(nr+n′ r+|l| −m)! m! (nr−m)! (n′ r−m)!/parenleftBiggλ−λ′ λ+λ′/parenrightBiggnr+n′ r−2m , where we rearranged the sum to make the formula slightly more amenable to computer implementation. With some minor algebra and judicious mani pulation of Pochhammers one sees that the expression has the correct λ′→λlimit ofδnr,n′r. Given the relationships of Appendix B and that λ=α2the result needed for Section 3.1 is: Tn,n′,l(α α′) =ISHO nr=n−|l| 2,n′r=n′−|l| 2,l(α2,α′2) (D.3) References [1] J.B. Coon, R.E. DeWames, C.M. Loyd, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 8, 285 (1962). [2] F. Iachello, M. Ibrahim, J. Phys. Chem. A., 102, 9427 (1998). [3] T. M¨ uller, P. Dupr´ e, P.H. Vaccaro, F. P´ erez-Bernal, M . Ibrahim, F. Iachello, Chemical Physics Letters, 292, 243 (1998). [4] For a review of Lie algebraic methods in molecular spectr oscopy, see, F. Iachello, R.D. Levine, Algebraic Theory of Molecules (Oxford University Press, NY, 1995). [5] F. Iachello, S. Oss, Phys. Rev. Lett., 666, 2976 (1991). [6] Y. Alhassid, F. G¨ ursey, F. Iachello, Ann. Phys. (NY), 148, 346 (1983); Chem. Phys. Lett.,99, 27 (1983); R.D. Levine, Chem. Phys. Lett., 95, 87 (1983). [7] M.I. Ibrahim, In preperation. [8] F. Iachello, S. Oss, J. Chem. Phys., 104, 6956 (1996). [9] For a review of the theory of coherent states, see, W. Zhan g, D.H. Feng, R. Gillmore, Rev. Mod. Phys., 62, 867 (1990). [10] R. Gilmore, C.M. Bowden, L.M. Narducci, Phys, Rev. A., 12, 1019 (1975). [11] R. Gillmore, J. Math. Phys., 20, 891 (1979); see also pp. 109ff. of [ ??]. [12] J.P. Pique, J. Manners, G. Sitja, M. Joyeux, J. Chem. Phy s.,96, 6495 (1992). [13] C. Jungen, D.N. Malm, A.J. Merer, Can. J. Phys., 51, 1471 (1973). 13[14] See, for example, S. Fl¨ ugge, Practical Quantum Mechanics , Vol. I (Springer-Verlag, NY, 1971), pp. 107–110. [15] See, for example, I.S. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 5th ed. (Academic Press, NY, 1980), pp. 849, 850. 14SHO (Fig. 2) SHO (Fig. 3) PT (Fig. 3) α2(cm−2) 1.418×10181.418×10181.418×1018 r∗ bent(cm) 2.282×10−95.459×10−95.459×10−9 α2 ¯α2(unitless) – – 312. Table 1: Parameters for Figures 2 and 3. The parameters of Fig ure 2 were chosen to reflect the1B2→Σ+ gtransitions of CS2. The parameters of Figure 3 correspond to a similar molecule with a greater bend. 15(a) (b)V(r) (arb. units) r (arb. units) Figure 1: The geometry and radial potentials (of the central atom) of a triatomic model. In the linear configuration (a) the potential has a true minim a atr= 0 (the Hessian is positive definite) and there is a normal mode for each of the tw o degrees of freedom. In the bent configuration (b) the potential has a continuous man ifold of minima along a circle surrounding the origin (the Hessian has one positive and one 0 eigenvalue). There is only one non-spurious normal mode (radial vibrations or bending modes). The second mode is lost to the overall rotational degree of freedom. 16| 〈 〉 | |Σ= 2 21 + n nB ;0; rg r | 〈 〉 | |Σ= 2 21 + n nB ;1; rg r ( ) n + gr Σ Linear Configuration 0 2 4 6 80.00.10.20.3l=0 Subspace l=1 Subspace Bent Config. 1st Excited State0.00.10.20.30.40.5 Bent Config. Ground State Figure 2: The FC factors from a bent to linear configuration ca lculated numerically assuming the potential is harmonic about the minima. The parameters a re chosen for the1B2→Σ+ g transition of CS2(see Table 2). The factors are plotted for a fixed bent configur ation (1B2) state as a function of the radial quantum number of the linear configuration (Σ+ g) for two subspaces of constant l. 17|〈 〉 | |ΨΨ 2Linear 0Bent n n r r = n r Linear Configuration 0 5 10 15 200.000.050.100.15 0.000.050.100.150.20 SHO PTBent Config. Gnd State Bent Config. 1st Excited State Figure 3: The FC factors from a bent to linear configuration ca lculated for a fictitious molecule having similar harmonic distance scales as CS2but a much larger bend (see Ta- ble 2). The factors are plotted for a potential of both harmon ic (SHO) and P¨ oschl-Teller (PT) type. The depth of the PT potential was chosen so that the graph shows states up to nearly the disassociation energy. 18|〈 〉 | |ΨΨ 2Bent 0Linear n n r r = n r Bent Configuration 0 5 10 15 200.00.10.20.30.40.5 N=120 ξ=.21 N=80 ξ=.22 SHO αr*=3 0 5 10 15 200.00.10.20.30.40.5 N=120 ξ=.29 N=80 ξ=.34 SHO αr*=5 0 5 10 15 200.00.10.20.30.40.5 N=120 ξ=.42 N=80 ξ=.56 SHO αr*=7l=1 Subspace Figure 4: The FC factors from a linear to bent configuration ca lculated for three different radial displacements assuming the transition corresponds to a (1)U(3) change of basis within the irrep. [ N] = 120; (2) U(3) change of basis within the irrep. [ N] = 80; (3) harmonic Schr¨ odinger potential. 19

arXiv:physics/0005037v1 [physics.chem-ph] 15 May 2000Algebraic Models: Coordinates, Scales, and Dynamical Symmetries Michael W.N. Ibrahim Center for Theoretical Physics, Sloane Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520–8120 Abstract We discuss the variety of coordinates often used to characte rize the coherent state clas- sical limit of an algebraic model. We show selection of appro priate coordinates naturally motivates a procedure to generate a single particle Schr¨ od inger hamiltonian which, for low energy states, gives equivalent results to a bosonic algebr aic model to leading order in N. The process is used to study the associated geometries of the dynamical symmetries of U(3). By demanding that the inner product be preserved in the Schr¨ odinger picture we conclude that different dynamical symmetries correspond to different scales. 1 Introduction Recently, hybrid algebraic-Schr¨ odinger approaches for t he study of transition intensities in molecules have been introduced [1–3]. In these approaches o ne relies on Schr¨ odinger/algebraic correspondences to introduce operators in the algebra whic h are functions of configuration space parameters. For the U(2) model considered in [1,2] one does so by relying on corre- spondences between a particular dynamical symmetry and a Sc hr¨ odinger Hamiltonian [4]. For more complicated algebras such correspondences are not available. Further, the inner- product of two algebraic states is not equal to the Schr¨ odin ger inner-product of their images. Since, in some circumstances, the inner-product of the alge bra has a natural interpretation as a Schr¨ odinger overlap [5] such shortcomings are an imped iment to understanding molec- ular structure. It would therefore be useful to have a generic correspondenc e —independent of a par- ticular dynamical symmetry— for the interpretation of alge braic parameters as geometric quantities which reside in configuration space (which is not iceably absent in the algebraic models). We provide such an interpretation by exploiting th e many approximate correspon- dences between algebraic and Schr¨ odinger pictures. We dem onstrate how one may turn an algebraic hamiltonian into a traditional Schr¨ odinger ( traditional meaning kinetic plus potential—with no coordinate dependent mass terms) single particle hamiltonian which will give the same results to leading order in N, the label for the symmetric representation of the algebra. Our procedure is most similar to the re-quant ization used by [6] to study 1spectra. We proceed further to study the wavefunctions and i nner product. Our approach differs from other studies which have examined the correspon dence between algebraic and Schr¨ odinger inner products [7] since they rely on particul ar dynamical symmetries. We work out our procedure explicitly for U(3) and conclude that different chains correspond not only to different geometries but different scales. 2 Algebraic Models: Constructing a Connection with Configuration Space Numerous correspondences between algebraic and Schr¨ odin ger methods and their classical limits can be succinctly summarized in the following simple diagram: Algebraic QMU(n−1) chain goes to SHO basis-Schr¨ odinger QM Coherent State LimitHolomorphic Quantization6 ? Compact CSPSClassical LimitCanonical Quantization6 ? Local Isomorphism- Classical Phase Space(2.1) Hamiltonians on the right hand side are written in terms of ge ometric parameters whereas those on the left are written in terms of algebraic ones. Thus , a careful exploitation of the horizontal correspondences should relate the different par ameters. We propose to do so by travelling counter-clockwise around the diagram—re-quan tizing the algebraic model. The vertical correspondences are extremely well defined and have been thoroughly dis- cussed in the literature [6,8–11]. The relationship betwee n theU(n)⊃U(n−1) and the simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) has also been discussed [1 2] and can be formalized by considering the contraction limit of the algebra [13,3]. Si milarly, if one finds appropriate coordinates in a patch of the coherent state phase space (CSP S) one may embed this region within a standard phase space and have a perfect copy of the dy namics for local trajectories [14]. The horizontal correspondences are approximate on the whol e given that the phase spaces are topologically different (compact versus non-com pact) in the classical regimes and one has a finite versus infinite dimensional Hilbert space in t he corresponding quantum cases. However, with careful selection of coordinates it will be se en that these incompatabilities will not effect the lower bound states in a re-quantization sc heme. It is to the selection of these coordinates we now turn. We mus t find coordinates in a patch of CSPS which behave like positions and momenta and th en identify these as coordinates covering the entire canonical phase space. In t he language of geometry, we wish 2to find coordinates in which the symplectic form determining the dynamics is in Darboux form:ω=dp∧dq[14]. Historically, it has been useful to think of the imagin ary part of the coherent state parameter αas a momenta [12,6]. We adopt that convention here to eliminate any remaining coordinate choice ambiguity. Examining the action in the propagator path integral [11,6] : one finds that the classical hamiltonian is given by the coherent state expectation, H=/an}bracketle{tα|ˆH|α/an}bracketri}ht;|α/an}bracketri}ht=1√ N!(√1−α·α∗σ†+ α·τ†)N|0/an}bracketri}htdenotes the coherent state in group coordinates [8]; σandτare typically scalar and tensor operators of O(3) respectively; and the hamiltonian evolution is determi ned by the symplectic form ω=i¯hd/an}bracketle{tα|d|α/an}bracketri}htwhich in group coordinates is explicitly: ω=Ni¯hdα∗ µ∧dαµ. (2.2) Deviating slightly from the typical development we let αµ=/radicalBigg mω 2(qµ√ N+i mωpµ√ N), (2.3) whereqandpare now dimensionful quantities and mωhas units of length over momentum and has the physical interpretation of the ratio of the natur al distance and momenta scales of the problem (see appendix A). In these coordinates the sympl ectic two-form is in standard Darboux form ω=dpµ∧dqµ, or equivalently {q,p}PB= 1 . We have been extremely explicit in order to contrast our choi ce with those of the litera- ture. For instance in the coordinates of [6] {˜q,˜p}PB=N. This point is obfuscated because the correct equations of motion are maintained by dividing t he classical action (and hence ω) byN. Such a procedure, however, leads to improper quantization . Similarly in terms of the projective coordinates [8] used to establish algebra ic-geometric correspondences in such references as [15,12] one has {˜q,˜p}PB=N(1 + ˜q2+ ˜p2)2. Thus only near the domain ˜p2+ ˜q2≈0 is it suitable to interpret these coordinates as the natura l coordinates of a cotangent bundle over configuration space. Classical Hamiltonians obtained from our coordinates usua lly have contributions such asp4 randp2 rr2. This leads to canonical quantization ordering ambiguitie s as well as higher degree differential equations. However, if we focus on the lo west bound states we may use an approximate hamiltonian which is valid in the classic al regions whose paths most greatly contribute to these states. In the spirit of the stat ionary phase approximation, the appropriate region would be near the fixed point of the hamilt onian flow, i.e. where dH= 0. Fortunately, since the CSPS limit of algebraic hamiltonian s typically have a convenient momenta dependence, i.e. H=p2 rf(p2 r,r2) +Veff(r), this condition implies we are looking in the region of reduced phase space near pr= 0 andr=r∗whereV′ eff(r∗) = 0. These conditions are eminently reasonable. Near this region the dynamics can be given by approximating t he hamiltonian: H(pr,r)≈H|pr=0,r=r∗+1 2/parenleftBig V′′ eff(r∗)(r−r∗)2+H12|p=0,r=r∗p2 r/parenrightBig , (2.4) 3where all other lower order terms vanish. Hence, at least loc ally around the fixed point of the system, our ordering ambiguities are resolved. If r∗is sufficiently far from the r= 0 phase space boundary one can sensically re-quantize. Given our coordinate choice each higher derivative in the ta ylor expansion of Hin equation 2.4 will be down by a factor of1√ N. Thus this approximation may be considered as an expansion in large N. Note, however that this procedure is distinct from other ‘l arge N’ techniques such as the contraction limit [13, 3]. Indeed, w e will see in section 3.2 that this procedure, in the specific instance for Hamiltonians wi th the dynamical symmetry U(n)⊃U(n−1), essentially reproduces the contraction limit results. We have carried out this discussion in a reduced phase space w ith a radial coordinate. That is, due to O(3) invariance the fixed point is not a true minima in the globa l phase space. In instances where one has a true fixed point in the glob al phase space (e.g. when the minima is at r= 0) a similar procedure applies. The introduction of the scales in equation 2.3 appears arbit ray. However, since we desire a generic correspondence which preserves the inner product structure of the algebra in the Schr¨ odinger picture, once a scale is picked for one Hamilto nian it must be fixed for others, i.e. any scale change would influence the overlap of eigensta tes which should be equated with the inner product of the representation. Thus, the scal e for each hamiltonian must be functionally related to the scale of another. If the relatio nship is not trivial mωmay depend on the parameters within the hamiltonian. This dependence o f the scale ratio, mω, will be suppressed until such subtleties must be considered, at whi ch time we will supplement our notation with subscripts. 3 An Explicit Example: U(3) 3.1 Coherent State Limit The algebraic approach for 2D problems was presented by [16] . One considers symmetric representations of u(3) realized with the two chains of interest: U(3)⊃U(2)⊃O(2) I U(3)⊃O(3)⊃O(2) II. (3.1) We use the same notation as [16] for the generators. However, we select a different O(3) subgroup which is generated by ˆR+,ˆR−, andˆl. Our choice introduces more ‘coordinate like’ terms of the classical Hamiltonian. The choice makes no diffe rence for spectra and only an overall phase for FC overlaps [17]. Please note that the O(3) group is a dynamical symmetry subgroup and does not have the interpretation of a rotation i n configuration space. The general Hamiltonian of a U(3) model is H=ǫˆn+δˆn(ˆn+ 1) +βˆl2−AˆW2, (3.2) whereǫ,δ, andAare taken as positive or 0. Setting A= 0 (ǫ=δ= 0) gives a Hamilto- nian with dynamical symmetry I (II). The basis correspondin g to chain I is labeled by the 4eigenvalues of ˆ nandˆlrespectively. The basis corresponding to chain II is labele d by the eigenvalues of ˆW2=1 2(ˆR+ˆR−+ˆR−ˆR+) +ˆl2and again ˆl. Taking the appropriate expectations one may calculate the c lassical limits of the various operators. The results are enumerated in Table 1. We reduce the phase space in the natural way: qx=rcosθ q y=rsinθ px=prcosθ−pθrsinθ py=prsinθ+pθrcosθ,(3.3) implying q·q=r2, p·p=p2 r+l2 cl r2, (3.4) wherel2 cl=p2 θr4is a constant of the motion. 3.2U(2)Chain We work out the re-quantization procedure in the case where A=β=δ= 0. In this instance we have the Hamiltonian on the reduced phase space: Hcl=ǫmω 2¯h/parenleftBigg1 (mω)2(p2 r+l2 cl r2) +r2/parenrightBigg . (3.5) The canonical quantization scheme yields the following pre scription: p2 r/ma√sto→ −¯h2 rd dr/parenleftBigg rd dr(·)/parenrightBigg , l/ma√sto→¯hl, (3.6) wherelnow labels irreps. of SO(2). This yields the quantum Hamiltonian: H=ǫ¯h 2mω/parenleftBigg −1 rd dr/parenleftBigg rd dr(·)/parenrightBigg +l2 r2+(mω)2 ¯h2r2/parenrightBigg , (3.7) which we immediately recognize as a multiple of a 2 Dcircular oscillator with energy levels spaced by ∆ E=ǫ[18]. This result perfectly agrees with direct algebraic ev aluation. We proceed similarly for δdifferent from 0. The classical Hamiltonian is then of the form: H=N(ǫ+ 2δ)ncl+δN(N−1)(ncl)2. (3.8) In Cartesian coordinates the conditions for a fixed point are : dH= 0 =N[ǫ+ 2δ+ 2δ(N−1)ncl] ×/parenleftBig ∂ncl ∂xdx+∂ncl ∂ydy+∂ncl ∂pxdpx+∂ncl ∂pydpy/parenrightBig ,(3.9) which is true at x=y=px=py= 0 (hence our use of Cartesian as opposed to radial coordinates). Near this point to second order our Hamiltoni an behaves like: H≈N(ǫ+ 2δ)ncl. (3.10) 5Re-quantization proceeds exactly as in the previous case le ading to an energy spacing of ∆E≈ǫ+ 2δ. The corresponding algebraic Hamiltonian ( H=ǫˆn+δˆn(ˆn+ 1)) has spacing for the lowest levels of ∆ E=ǫ+ 2δ. Additionally the same low energy eigenfunctions diagonali ze bothU(2) Hamiltonians in both the algebraic and approximate re-quantizing prescrip tions (i.e. in both prescriptions the inner-product of the lowest eigenfunctions of the Hamil tonain with δ= 0 andδ/ne}ationslash= 0 is 1). 3.3 Radially Displaced Oscillators—Near the O(3)Chain In the situation where our Hamiltonian is near the O(3) dynamical symmetry the fixed point of the Hamiltonian flow is not at r= 0. The potential is given by: Veff(r) =mω ¯h/bracketleftBig (X−Z)1 2r2+ (Y+Z)mω 4N¯hr4 +X1 21 (mω)2l2 r2+Y1 4N¯h(mω)3l4 r4/bracketrightBig ,(3.11) where we have made the definitions X=ǫ+ 2δ+β,Y=δ(N−1), andZ= 4A(N−1). The physically interesting regime [5] is ‘near’ the O(3) chain, i.e.X ZandY Zare both small. In this limit it is easy to find a perturbative solution for the conditionV′ eff(r∗) = 0 : (r∗)2≈N¯h mω/parenleftBigg 1 +X Z(l2 (N¯h)2−1)−Y Z/parenrightBigg , (3.12) where now it is clear that the presumption that r∗is large depends on Nbeing large. Note that having XorYdifferent from 0 decreases r∗. That is, the O(3) chain represents the maximum possible displacement. r∗may increase with increasing lhowever, corresponding to a larger angular momentum barrier. Sincelcan be as large as Nwe regardl2/N2as an independent quantity—even though in practice it is of the same order as terms which go 1 /N2. In anticipation of this we dropped the term going withl2 N4for simplicity. When one moves slightly off the O(3) chain different lsubspaces which were degenerate split resulting in the lowest energy difference, ∆ E, having a slight ldependence. As we’ve seen this dependence has entered in lowest order in the form o f termsl2 N2. Since the ratio l Ncan be regarded as a separate independent small quantity ign oring terms like O(1√ N) does not mean we loose all ldependence in our calculation. Our results for the energy level spacing will only be correct to leading order in N. Thelspace splitting behavior will be given correctly—but the actual values of the splitting wi ll be insignificant compared to other (non- ldependent) contributions we have ignored for smaller l. Continuing we see: V′′ eff(r∗)≈2Zmω ¯h/bracketleftBigg 1 +X Z/parenleftBigg 3l2 (N¯h)2−1/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg , (3.13) Hp2r|pr=0,r=r∗≈Z 2¯h(mω)/bracketleftBigg 1 +X Z(l2 (N¯h)2+ 1) +Y Z(2l2 (N¯h)2+ 1)/bracketrightBigg . (3.14) 6Near the fixed point the Hamiltonian’s behavior is given by eq uation 2.4. However, the radial quantum mechanics depends crucially on the point r= 0. Since equation 2.4 does not reproduce the original Hamiltonian’s behavior near this po int the approximation becomes suspect. It would be more reasonable to quantize: 1 2Hpr2|p=0,r=r∗p2 r+˜V(r), (3.15) where ˜V(r) has the same behavior near the fixed point as the approximate Hamiltonian and the behavior near r= 0 of the original Hamiltonian. That is: lim r→0r4˜V(r) =Y 4l4 N2¯h2(mω)2(3.16) ˜V(r) =H|pr=0,r=r∗+1 2V′′ eff(r∗)(r−r∗)2+O((r−r∗)3). (3.17) Additionally, of course, ˜Vshould not introduce any other minima at other locations. Following the prescription for the harmonic oscillator we u se the radial quantization scheme (equation 3.6), substituting for the wavefunction, Ψ =ψ√r, we obtain: −Hpr2¯h2 2ψ′′+/bracketleftBigg ˜V(r)−Hpr2¯h2 8r2/bracketrightBigg ψ=Eψ, (3.18) whereψ(0) = 0 and ψ(r→ ∞) = 0. The form of this equation is that of a 1-D Schr¨ odinger equation except the left boundary condition is applied at r= 0. At this point the r≈0 dependence of ˜Vbecomes crucial. Since ˜Vblows up more quickly than the counter term blows down the sum of the two still has a minima, although it sh ould be shifted inward fromr∗. Calling the new minima r∗∗=r∗(1−ǫ) and using our knowledge of the behavior of˜Vnearr∗we find that the conditiond dr/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle r=r∗∗/bracketleftbigg ˜V(r)−Hpr2¯h2 8r2/bracketrightbigg = 0 yields: ǫ≈1 16N2−3/bracketleftBigg 1−16N2 16N2−3/parenleftBigg 4X Z(l2 N2−1)−Y Z(2l2 N2+ 3)/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg (3.19) This can be expanded in Nwith leading contribution O(1 N2). Recalling that Nessentially counts the number of bound states (hence effectively measure s the depth of the potential) it is reasonable that1 N2should parameterize ǫ. Of course, since we are only working in leading order inNwe haveǫ≈0 and consequently r∗∗≈r∗. Our primary intent of displaying equation 3.19 is that the condition of Nbeing large is now clarified. Since the prefactor must be small we find 2 N≫1. Returning to equation 3.18 we notice that in our approximati on (r∗orr∗∗is large) a solution with the left boundary condition at r=−∞will, to a good approximation, satisfy the boundary condition at r= 0. In this instance the lower eigenvalues are given by E≈¯hω where ω2=Hpr2/bracketleftBigg ˜V′′(r∗∗)−3Hpr2¯h2 4(r∗∗)4/bracketrightBigg . (3.20) 7Given the properties of ˜Vwe have ˜V′′(r∗∗)≈˜V′′(r∗) =V′′ eff(r∗). The second term is O(1 N2) and may be ignored. Thus we have ∆E≈Z/bracketleftBigg 1 + 2X Zl2 N2+1 2Y Z/parenleftBigg 2l2 N2+ 1/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg . (3.21) We see that on the O(3) chain (X=Y= 0) we have a spacing of ∆ E≈Z≈4AN, as compared to the exact algebraic expression: ∆E=A[N(N+ 1)−(N−2)(N−1)] =A(4N−2), (3.22) which agrees to leading order in Nas advertised. Next we compute the induced harmonic dilatation constant of the geometry (see Ap- pendix A): α2≈ω ¯hH12≈2(mω) ¯h/bracketleftBigg 1 +X Z/parenleftBiggl2 N2−1/parenrightBigg −Y Z/parenleftBiggl2 N2+1 2/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg . (3.23) Note, that the ‘concavity’ corrections depend explicitly o n the algebraic parameters, in- dicative of the fact that our calculations have established relationships between algebraic Hamiltonians and the geometry of configuration space. Equations 3.23 and 3.12 for the harmonic dilatation and radi al displacement can be easily related to experimental data and provide useful assi stance when analyzing transition intensities as to be detailed in the upcoming publication [5 ]. 3.4 Near O(3)toO(3)Inner Product We wish to calculate the inner-product of eigenstates of a ha miltonian corresponding to slightly off O(3) symmetry to one on O(3). In either case the approximate wavefunctions are: ψdisp 0≈√α π1 4e−1 2[α(r−r∗)]2 √r, (3.24) where we have normalized it on the interval [ −∞,∞] (as opposed to [0 ,∞]) as this only introduces errors of order1 N. The parameters αandr∗are determined by 3.23 and 3.12. We useα′andr∗′as the parameters of the wavefunction exactly on the O(3) chain (determined by the same equations except X=Y= 0). Note that there is an ldependence hidden in bothr∗andα. Since both wavefunctions are essentially 0 for r<0 we may again calculate the overlap on the interval [ −∞,∞]. Thus we wish to evaluate the integral I0,0≈/integraldisplay∞ −∞φ(α;r−r∗)φ(α′;r−r∗′)dr, (3.25) whereφis the ground state wavefunction of a 1D SHO. The integral is e asily evaluated to [1]: I0,0≈/bracketleftBigg2αα′ α2+α′2/bracketrightBigg1 2 ×exp/bracketleftBigg −(αα′(r∗′−r∗))2 2(α2+α′2)/bracketrightBigg . (3.26) 8As stated previously the ratio of scales mωneed not be the same in both scenarios and may indeed depend on the value of X,Y, andZ. However, this dependance must be smooth. Since the difference between these two scenarios is perturba tive one concludes thatmω mω′= 1 +δwhereδ∼O(X/Z,Y/Z ). Given this, we have: I0,0≈1 +O/parenleftbigg (X Z)2,(Y Z)2/parenrightbigg (3.27) This is the exact overlap one would expect from perturbation theory of the algebraic model as spelled out in Appendix B. 3.5O(3)toU(2)Inner-Products Given equation 3.27, to our order the overlaps from a hamilto nian nearO(3) to theU(2) chain should be exactly the same as the exact O(3)-U(2) factors. For theU(2) chain we have the ground state wavefunction [18]: ψU(2) 0=/radicalBigg 2 |l|!(αU(2))|l|+1r|l|e−1 2[αU(2)r]2, (3.28) where (αU(2))2=mωU(2) ¯h. Thus our overlap becomes: I0,0(αU(2) α,αr∗) =/radicalBigg 2α |l|!(αU(2))|l|+1 π1 4exp/bracketleftBigg −1 2α2α2 U(2) α+2r∗2/bracketrightBigg (3.29) ×/integraldisplay∞ 0drr|l|+1 2exp/bracketleftBigg −1 2(α+r−α2r∗ α+)2/bracketrightBigg whereα2 +=α2 U(2)+α2, andαis again defined by 3.23 with X=Y= 0 . The integral may be expressed in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions : /integraldisplay∞ 0drr|l|+1 2exp/bracketleftBigg −1 2(α+r−α2r∗ α+)2/bracketrightBigg = 22l−1 41 α+3+2l 2exp −1 2/parenleftBiggα2r∗ α+/parenrightBigg2  ×  Γ/parenleftBigg3 + 2l 4/parenrightBigg 1F1 3 + 2l 4,1 2;1 2/parenleftBiggα2r∗ α+/parenrightBigg2  (3.30) +√ 2/parenleftBiggα2r∗ α+/parenrightBigg Γ/parenleftBigg5 + 2l 4/parenrightBigg 1F1 5 + 2l 4,1 2;1 2/parenleftBiggα2r∗ α+/parenrightBigg2   . We note thatα2r∗ α+∼Nand hence use an asymptotic expansion for the hypergeometri c functions [19]. Keeping only the most dominant contributio n of the integral we find: I0,0≈π1 4 /radicalBig |l|!/parenleftbiggαU(2) α/parenrightbigg|l|+1/parenleftBiggα α+/parenrightBigg4+2|l| exp/bracketleftBigg −1 2α2α2 U(2) α+2r∗2/bracketrightBigg (αr∗)5+2|l| 2. (3.31) 9Substituting the expressions for the harmonic scales, and l ettingζ=mωU(2) mωO(3)we find I0,0≈π1 4 /radicalBig |l|!/parenleftBiggζ 2/parenrightBigg|l|+1/parenleftBigg2 ζ+ 2/parenrightBigg2+|l| exp −N1 1 +2 ζ (2N)5+2|l| 4. (3.32) 3.6 Scale Changes Comparing the analytic expression of the U(2)/O(3) overlaps (equation 3.32 calculated by approximately requantizing) and the expression from appen dix equation B.5 (calculated by direct algebraic means) fixes the scale dependance. Compari ng the exponential dependance of the two expressions, e−ln 2 2Nvs.e/bracketleftbigg −N1 1+2 ζ/bracketrightbigg , (3.33) leads to the conclusion that: ζ=mωU(2) mωO(3)≈2 ln2 2−ln 2. (3.34) The rest of the dependance can be fixed by allowing ζto havelogN Nand1 Ncorrections. To see this we let: ζ≈2 log 2 2−log 2/parenleftBigg 1−4 log 2(2 −log 2)logγ N/parenrightBigg , (3.35) or equivalently (1 +2 ζ)−1≈log 2 2−logγ N. (3.36) Substituting into the expression 3.32 we find the first order t erm of the large Nasymptotic: I0,0≈π1 4 /radicalBig |l|!/bracketleftBigglog 2 2/bracketrightBigg|l|+1/bracketleftBigg2−log 2 2/bracketrightBigg (2N)5+2|l| 4e−Nlog 2 2γ. (3.37) Comparing with the algebraic expression we conclude that γ=23 4 2−log 2(log 2)−(|l|+1)N−3 2 (3.38) That is, in order for the Schr¨ odinger and algebraic prescri ptions to be commensurate for the leading asymptotic in N, we must have the first orders of the asymptotics of ζ: ζ≈2 log 2 2−log 2/bracketleftBigg 1 +4 log 2(2 −log 2)/braceleftBigg3 2logN N+ (|l|log log 2 +c)1 N/bracerightBigg/bracketrightBigg , (3.39) c= log log 2 −log23 4 2−log 2(3.40) 10Calculating the inner product of the eigenstates of an algeb raic hamiltonian on the U(2) chain with the eigenstates of another hamiltonian off of the U(2) chain is not simply analo- gous to the overlap of radially displaced oscillators, but a nalagous to the matrix elements of an operator which radially displaces anddilatates (much like the operator matrix elements calculated in [1]) changing the natural scale of the problem . The degree of dilatation de- pends on the proximity of the second hamiltonian to either ch ain. For chains near U(2) the dilatation paramater is essentially 1. As one moves nearer t o theO(3) chain the dilatation parameter increases, approaching the value given by equati on 3.39. This has considerable consequences for hybrid algebraic-Schr¨ odinger analysis of molecules [5]. 4 Conclusions We have provided a procedure, via requantization, to conver t a hamiltonian of an algebraic model into a Schr¨ odinger hamiltonian which will give the sa me results for the lower states to leading order in N. The procedure is optimized for algebras which are interpre ted as single particle hamiltonians. Thus, it seems most applicab le to molecular models such as the vibron model U(4) [21], the anharmonic oscillator U(2) [4], and the two dimensional U(3) model considered here. Although the prescription should ge nerate Schr¨ odinger hamiltonians in other models it remains to be seen whether or not such resul ts would have appropriate many-body interpretations. We have carried out the requantization process in detail for the limiting cases of the U(3) model. By demanding that the wavefunction overlap of the requantized system agree with the inner product of the algebraic model we have demonst rated that different chains of theU(3) model correspond to not only different geometries but diff erent scales. 5 Acknowledgements This work was performed in part under the U.S. Department of E nergy, Contract No. DE- FG02-91ER40608. I extend my deepest gratitude to my advisor , Prof. Franco Iachello, for introducing me to the problem and his suggestions and feedba ck on this work. I thank Prof. Dimitri Kusnezov for also making suggestions on this m anuscript. Finally, I would like to thank the Department of Energy’s Institute for Nucle ar Theory at the University of Washington for its hospitality during the completion of thi s work. Appendices 11A Scales in the Schr¨ odinger Picture Consider a traditional Schr¨ odinger Hamiltonian (1-D for s implicity), H=−¯h2 2md2 dx2+V0f(¯αx), (A.1) with the distance scale ¯ αand momenta scale given by¯α mω= (mV0)−1 2. We on occasion refer to the induced harmonic dilatation cons tant—which we define as the distance scale (dilatation constant of the wavefunctio ns) one obtains by approximating the potential about a minimum to second order. For a SHO f(x) =1 2x2andV0=mω2 ¯α2. In this instance mω=mωand we define the distance scale ¯ α2=mω ¯h. Ifx∗denotes the minimum of a more complicated potential we see that the dista nce scale associated with its harmonic approximation is α2=mω ¯h/radicalBig f′′(¯αx∗). (A.2) The induced scale depends on two quantities: (1) the ratio of the true distance and momenta scales; (2) the concavity of the potential about the minima. B Algebraic Calculations of Overlaps near O(3) We wish to find the overlaps of eigenstates of the hamiltonian H=A/parenleftBigg(ǫ+δ) Aˆn+δ Aˆn(ˆn+ 1) +β Aˆl2−ˆW2/parenrightBigg (B.1) to the hamiltonian with ǫ=δ=β= 0 in the limit where Ais large. We may work within subspaces of constant lso that there are no degeneracies. We denote the basis from the O(3) chain by |[N],ω,l/an}bracketri}htwhereω(ω+ 1) is the eigenvalue ofˆW2. TheU(2) chain basis is denoted by |[N],n,l/an}bracketri}htanalogously. We denote the transfor- mation matrix between them by ζ, i.e.|[N],ω/an}bracketri}ht=/summationtext nζω n|[N],n/an}bracketri}ht, where we have suppressed the implicit ldependance. The wavefunction for the ground state may be perturbatively calculated to first order: |[N],Elow/an}bracketri}ht ≈ |[N],ω=N/an}bracketri}ht+/summationdisplay ω′/negationslash=N|[N],ω′/an}bracketri}ht/summationtext n(ζω′ n)∗ζω=N n[(ǫ+ 2δ)n+δn2] AN(N+ 1)−Aω′(ω′+ 1). (B.2) As always in perturbation theory, to first order in1 Athe wavefunctions only have correc- tions orthogonal to the unpeturbed wavefunction. Conseque ntly the overlap from a slight deformation off the O(3) chain to the O(3) chain is identically 1 to this order. We now concentrate on the overlap between the O(3) andU(2) chains. In this limit we have: I0,0=/an}bracketle{t[N],n=|l|,l|[N],ω=N,l/an}bracketri}ht=ζω=N n=|l|. (B.3) 12These coefficients are calculated in [17]: ζω=N n=|l|=/bracketleftBigg(N+|l|)! 2|l||l|! (2N−1)!!/bracketrightBigg1 2 . (B.4) Using (2N−1)!! = 2NΓ(N+1 2)/Γ(1 2) and the Stirling approximation Γ( z+b)∼√ 2πe−zzz+b−1 2[19] this formula may be approximated for large Nby: I0,0≈π1 4 2|l| 2/radicalBig |l|!N|l| 2−1 4e−log 2 2N. (B.5) If one wishes to algebraically calculate FC transitions to h igher energy U(2) bound states one may proceed in the exact same fashion to find In,0≈π1 4Nn 2−1 4e−log 2 2N 2n 2/radicalBig (n+l 2)! (n−l 2)!. (B.6) References [1] F. Iachello, M. Ibrahim, J. Phys. Chem. A., 102, 9427 (1998). [2] T. M¨ uller, P. Dupr´ e, P.H. Vaccaro, F. P´ erez-Bernal, M . Ibrahim, F. Iachello, Chemical Physics Letters, 292, 243 (1998). [3] For a review of Lie algebraic methods in molecular spectr oscopy, see, F. Iachello, R.D. Levine, Algebraic Theory of Molecules (Oxford University Press, NY, 1995). [4] Y. Alhassid, F. G¨ ursey, F. Iachello, Ann. Phys. (NY), 148, 346 (1983); Chem. Phys. Lett.,99, 27 (1983); R.D. Levine, Chem. Phys. Lett., 95, 87 (1983). [5] M. Ibrahim, http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0005036 . [6] O.S. van Roosmalen, Algebraic Descriptions of Nuclear and Molecular Rotation- Vibration Spectra , Ph.D. Thesis (University of Groningen, Netherlands, 1982 ). [7] C. Wulfman, Phys. Rev. A, 54, R987 (1996). [8] R. Gilmore, C.M. Bowden, L.M. Narducci, Phys, Rev. A., 12, 1019 (1975). [9] A.E.L. Dieperink, O. Scholten, F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. L ett.,44, 1747 (1980). [10] The foundations of quantizing Lie groups to obtain alge braic quantum mechanics can be found in: B. Kostant, “Quantization and Unitary Represen tation,” Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 170 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970) ; J.-M. Soriau, “Structure des Syst` emes Dynamiques,” (Dunod, Paris, 1970); alternat ively one may use the more physical path integral approach in section 4 of [11]. 13[11] For a review of the theory of coherent states, see, W. Zha ng, D.H. Feng, R. Gilmore, Rev. Mod. Phys., 62, 867 (1990). [12] See, for example, F. Iachello, A. Arima, The Interacting Boson Model (Cambridge University Press, NY, 1987). [13] R. Gilmore, Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications (John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1974). [14] See, for example, V.I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer Verlag, NY, 1978), pp. 201ff. [15] B. Shao, N.R. Walet, R.D. Amado, Phys. Rev. A, 46, 4037 (1992); B. Shao, N.R. Walet, R.D. Amado, Phys. Rev. A, 47, 2064 (1993). [16] F. Iachello, S. Oss, J. Chem. Phys., 104, 6956 (1996). [17] E. Santopinto, R. Bijker, F. Iachello, J. Math. Phys., 37, 2674 (1996). [18] See, for example, S. Fl¨ ugge, Practical Quantum Mechanics , Vol. I (Springer-Verlag, NY, 1971), pp. 107–110. [19] See, for example, M. Abromowitz, I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover Publications, Inc., NY, 1965), pp. 255, 257, 508. [20] F. Iachello, S. Oss, Phys. Rev. Lett., 666, 2976 (1991). [21] F. Iachello, Chem. Phys. Lett, 78, 581 (1981); F. Iachello, R.D. Levine, J. Chem. Phys, 77, 3046 (1982). [22] See, for example, I.S. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 5th ed. (Academic Press, NY, 1980), pp. 849, 850. 14Group Coordinates Projective Coordinates /an}bracketle{tˆl/an}bracketri}ht/N ≡lcl(˜lcl) qxpy−qypx 2Σ(˜qx˜py−˜qy˜px) /an}bracketle{tˆn/an}bracketri}ht/N ≡ncl(˜ncl)1 2(q·q+p·p) Σ(˜ q·˜q+ ˜p·˜p) /an}bracketle{tˆn2/an}bracketri}ht/N ncl+ (N−1)(ncl)2˜ncl+ (N−1)(˜ncl)2 /an}bracketle{tˆl2/an}bracketri}ht/N ncl+ (N−1)(lcl)2˜ncl+ (N−1)(˜lcl)2 /an}bracketle{tˆW2/an}bracketri}ht/N(N−1) (lcl)2+ 2(1 −ncl)q·q+2 N−1(˜lcl)2+ 4Σ2˜q·˜q+2 N−1(Σ + ˜ncl) Table 1: The coherent state limit of U(3) operators in group and projective coordinates. In group coordinates we take the expectation in the state1√ N!(√1−α·α∗σ†+α·τ†)N|0/an}bracketri}htand letα=1√ 2(q+ip) to reproduce the standard form of the angular momentum. In p rojective coordinates the unnormalized coherent state is parameteri zed by1√ N!(σ†+ ˜α·τ†)N|0/an}bracketri}ht. One must then divide the expectation by the normalization. We th en let ˜α= (˜q+i˜p) to jibe with the standard definitions in the literature. Note that the ‘ q’s’ and ‘p’s’ in each column are not the same. We have further made the abbreviation for projecti ve coordinates: Σ =1 1+(˜q·˜q+˜p·˜p). 15

arXiv:physics/0005038v1 [physics.atom-ph] 15 May 2000Off-Diagonal Hyperfine Interaction and Parity Non-conserva tion in Cesium V.A.Dzuba and V.V.Flambaum School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney 205 2,Australia (March 27, 2011) Abstract We have performed relativistic many-body calculations of t he hyperfine inter- action in the 6 sand 7sstates of Cs, including the off-diagonal matrix element. The calculations were used to determine the accuracy of the s emi-empirical formula for the electromagnetic transition amplitude /angbracketleft6s|M1|7s/angbracketrightinduced by the hyperfine interaction. We have found that even though the contribution of the many-body effects into the matrix elements is very larg e, the square root formula /angbracketleft6s|Hhfs|7s/angbracketright=/radicalBig /angbracketleft6s|Hhfs|6s/angbracketright/angbracketleft7s|Hhfs|7s/angbracketrightremains valid to the accuracy of a fraction of 10−3. The result for the M1-amplitude is used in the interpretation of the parity-violation measurement in the 6s−7stransition in Cs which claims a possible deviation from the Standard mod el. PACS: 32.80.Ys,31.15.Ar,32.10.Fn Typeset using REVT EX 1I. INTRODUCTION Recent progress in highly accurate measurements of parity n on-conservation (PNC) in atoms has got to the point where new physics beyond the Standa rd Model of elementary particles can be studied. The latest analysis [1] of the most precise measurements of the PNC in cesium [2] suggests that the value of the weak charge of the133Cs nucleus may differ from the prediction of the Standard Model. In that experimen t [2] the ratio of the PNC E1 amplitude to the tensor polarizability βfor the 7S1/2−6S1/2transition was measured with 0.35% accuracy. The measured value can be written in the form kPNC βQW N, (1) wherekPNCis the electron matrix element of the electric dipole transi tion induced by the weak interaction between 7 S1/2and 6S1/2states of133Cs,QWis the weak nuclear charge and N is the number of neutrons. To interpret the measurement s in terms of the weak nuclear charge one needs to know kPNCandβ. The value of kPNCcan be obtained from atomic calculations only. Bennett and Wieman [1] used the va luekPNC= 0.9065(36)iea0 which is the average of our result kPNC= 0.908(9)iea0[3] obtained in 1989 and the result of the Notre-Dame group kPNC= 0.905(9)iea0[4] obtained in 1990. Note that Bennett and Wieman assumed 0.4% accuracy of the calculations contrary t o the 1% accuracy claimed in both calculations. This assumption was based on the compari son of the calculated atomic quantities relevant to the PNC amplitude (electromagnetic transition amplitudes between lowersandpstates and hyperfine structure intervals of these states) wi th the latest very accurate measurements which resolved major discrepancies between theory and experiment in favor of theory. The most precise value of β,β= 27.024(43)(67) a3 0, was obtained in Ref. [1] from the measurements of the ratio M1hfs/βwhereM1hfsis theM1 transition amplitude between the states 6 Sand 7Sinduced by the hyperfine structure (hfs) interaction. Semie mpirical formula for the M1hfsamplitude derived in Refs. [5–7] was used in the analysis: M1hfs=−/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleµB c/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle√A6sA7s E7s−E6s1 2(gS−gI)1.0024 (2) HereA6sandA7sare the hfs constants of the 6 sand 7sstates of Cs, gS= 2.0025,gI= −0.0004, the coefficient 1.0024 was introduced to account for the many-body effects. This givesM1hfs=|µB c|0.8094(20) ×10−5[6,7]. Valuesβ= 27.024(43)(67) a3 0andkPNC= 0.9065(36)iea0and measurements of (1) [2] lead to the value of the weak charge of133CsQW=−72.06(28)(34) which differs from the prediction of the Standard Model QW=−73.20(13) [8] by 2 .5σ. From the point of view of accurate atomic calculations, ther e are two major questions in the analysis above which should be considered. The first is wh ether the actual accuracy of the PNC calculations is really 0.4%. The second is whether th e semi-empirical formula (2) is accurate. In the present paper we address the second quest ion, leaving the first one for later work. 2II. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS M1hfsamplitude appears due to mixing of the 6 sand 7sstates by the hfs interaction, M1hfs=/angbracketleft6s,F|Hhfs|7s,F/angbracketright E6s−E7s/angbracketleft7s,F|M1|7s,F′/angbracketright +/angbracketleft6s,F|M1|6s,F′/angbracketright/angbracketleft6s,F′|Hhfs|7s,F′/angbracketright E7s−E6s. (3) Two major assumptions have been made to arrive at (2) from (3) . First, the non-relativistic expression for the operator of the M1 transition was used: M1 =−|µB|g(L+2S). (4) Second, the square root formula is assumed to be valid /angbracketleft6s|Hhfs|7s/angbracketright=/radicalBig /angbracketleft6s|Hhfs|6s/angbracketright/angbracketleft7s|Hhfs|7s/angbracketright. (5) The accuracy of both of these assumptions needs to be examine d. The situation is clear with the relativistic corrections to the M1 operator (4). According to the estimations of Bouchiat and Piketty [6] the relativistic effects modify the amplitud es/angbracketleft6s|M1|6s/angbracketrightand/angbracketleft7s|M1|7s/angbracketrightat only the 10−4level. This is in line with the many-body calculations of the relativistic effects ing-factors and M1-transition amplitudes for Cs and other alkaline atoms in o ur early works [9,10]. The situation with the square root formula (5) is less clear. In their pioneering work Bouchiat and Piketty [6] estimated the first order core polar ization corrections to it and introduced the correction factor 1.0017. In a later paper by Bouchiat and Gu´ ena [7] this factor was assumed to be 1.0024 (see also formula (2)). The ac curacy of the estimation of the many body correction was assumed to be approximately equ al to the correction itself (∼0.002) [6,7]. In these works there were no accurate calculatio ns of other many body contributions to the hfs beyond the first order core polariza tion corrections. However, it is known that these contributions can be up to 20% of the hyperfin e structure (see below). The applicability of eq. (2) in this situation is not obvious . The accurate relativistic many-body calculations of the off -diagonal hfs matrix element (5) were recently performed by the Notre Dame group [11]. The accuracy of the calculations was about 1% and agreement with formula (5) within this accur acy was achieved. Note that the theoretical accuracy for the diagonal hfs matrix elemen ts is also about 1% (see Refs. [12,13] and this article). This accuracy is not sufficient to fi nd an accurate value of βto add anything new to the result of the cesium PNC experiment publi shed in [2]. However, we believe that the validity of the square root form ula (5) can be demonstrated to much higher accuracy than the absolute theoretical accur acy of the hfs calculations (here we agree with [5–7]). We suggest that the following combinat ion of matrix elements be calculated R=/angbracketleft6s|Hhfs|7s/angbracketright/radicalBig /angbracketleft6s|Hhfs|6s/angbracketright/angbracketleft7s|Hhfs|7s/angbracketright−1, (6) 3where all hfs matrix elements are calculated in the same appr oximation. The value of R can be calculated with very high accuracy because uncertain ties in different matrix elements cancel each other almost exactly. We will demonstrate that i nclusion of different many body and relativistic effects leave the formula /angbracketleft6s|Hhfs|7s/angbracketright=/radicalBig /angbracketleft6s|Hhfs|6s/angbracketright/angbracketleft7s|Hhfs|7s/angbracketright (7) valid to very high accuracy, so that the value of R(6) remains very small. Let us start from the analytical estimates of different contr ibutions to Rin (6). First note that in the single-electron approximation formula (7) is exact if the wave functions of the 6sand 7sstates are proportional ψ6s=Bψ7s (8) (a0is Bohr radius) on short distances from the nucleus, r≤a0/Z. Dirac equations for the states 6sand 7sdiffer by the energy only. Therefore, their solutions on shor t distances where the difference in energies is small compared to the pote ntial, differ by normalization only. One can say that (8) is valid if ∆E/|V| ≪1, (9) where ∆E= 0.08445 a.u. is the energy difference between the 6 sand 7sstates of Cs, Vis the atomic potential. The Hamiltonian of the hfs interact ionHhfsis proportional to 1/r3and the main contribution to its matrix elements comes from t he distances r≤a0/Z. Substitution of V=Ze2/r,r=a0/ZandZ= 55 into (9) gives ∆E V≈3×10−5. (10) Note that for s-waves the correction can be even smaller. Indeed, in the non -relativistic approximation s-wave hfs is proportional to δ(r). Thus, the typical distances r∼¯h/(mec) = αa0, whereα= 1/137. Let us now consider the many-body effects. It is convenient to do this using the many body perturbation theory in the residual Coulomb interacti onU, U =H−HHF. HereHis the exact Hamiltonian of the atom and HHFis the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian. We generate the complete zero-approximation set of the eigenvalues, wa ve functions and Green’s functions using the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian. The small parameter of this many-body perturbation theory is the ratio of the non-diagonal matrix element of the residual interaction Uto the large energy denominator for excitation of the electron from the closed electron shell (electron core), e.g. 5p -electron: U/E 5p∼10−2. The perturbative (correlation) corrections to the hfs matr ix element can be divided into two classes: the self-energy corrections and the vertex cor rections. The former can be included into eq. (6) through the redefinition of the single e lectron wave functions while the latter are included through the redefinition of the Hhfsoperator. Self-energy corrections dominate in the hfs of alkaline ato ms (see, e.g. [14]). The major contribution is due to the correlations between an external electron and core electrons. We include them by using so called Brueckner orbitals instead o f the Hartree-Fock orbitals as the single-electron wave functions in eq. (6). The Brueckner or bitals are obtained by introducing 4an additional operator ˆΣ into the Hartree-Fock equations for the external electron and solving the Dyson-type equation ( HHF+ˆΣ(E)−E)ψ= 0. The ˆΣ is an energy-dependent non-local operator which is also called the “correlation po tential” [12,15]. For the calculation ofˆΣ see the next section. The Brueckner type correlation corre ction constitutes 20% of the hfs of 6sand 7sstates of Cs. However, if we neglect the dependence of ˆΣ on energy, the estimation (10) is still valid. It follows from the calcu lations that ∂ˆΣ/∂E∼1% for E∼E6s,E7s(it is suppressed by the parameter ∆ E/E 5p). This leaves condition (10) practically unchanged. Dominating vertex corrections to the hfs matrix element are due to the effect of core po- larization by the nuclear dipole magnetic field. Since the co re states change in the magnetic field, the Hartree-Fock potential Vcreated by the core electrons as well as the correlation potential ˆΣ also change. The effect of this change on the hfs can be accoun ted for by redefining the operator of the hfs interaction [12]: H′ hfs=Hhfs+δV+δˆΣ. (11) The correction to the hfs caused by δVis often called the RPA-type [16] correction, while an- other correction associated with δˆΣ is the non-Brueckner correlation correction or structura l radiation [15]. These corrections are more likely to cause d eviation from the square root formula since they are localized on larger distances up to th e core radius. Note, however, that in the case of the hfs interaction δVis completely due to the Hartree-Fock exchange potential. There is no change to the Hartree-Fock direct pot ential since magnetic field does not change electron density in the first order of perturbatio n theory. This means that δV vanishes exponentially outside the core. Inside the core, a tr∼a0, ∆E/V∼0.01 and the 6sand 7sorbitals are still proportional. Note that the potential Vat these distances may be estimated as V∼ −Zeffe2/r, whereZeff∼5. Since the contribution of δVis about 10% we come to the estimate 10−3for the error of the square root formula. There is one more reason why the square root formula is accura te. The expression for R(6) is symmetric with respect to the energies E6sandE7s. Therefore, its decomposition over ∆E(∆E=E6s−E7s) starts from ∆ E2: R=a(∆E)2+b(∆E)4+.... (12) Since all linear in ∆ Eterms are canceled out one can say that the error should be sma ller than in the estimates above. The dimensionless parameter fo r (12) is (∆E/E 5p)2∼10−2, whereE5p≈0.84 a.u. is the core excitation energy. Since the term a(∆E)2arises due to δV andδˆΣ which contribute about 10% and 1%, respectively, into the h fs, the total deviation from the square root formula caused by the RPA and non-Brueck ner corrections should be smaller than 10−1×10−2= 10−3. We may add that the contribution of δˆΣ to the hfs is much smaller than the contribution of ˆΣ sinceδˆΣ has an additional suppression by the parameter (∆E/E 5p) [15]. There are also contributions to the self-energy and vertex d ue to the radiative corrections. We have not considered these contributions in our calculati ons. However, they come from 5the very short distances r≤¯h/m ec=αa0and should not cause any significant deviation from the square root formula. Finally, let us estimate contributions to M1hfswhich cannot be presented in the form of eq. (3). Let us use the basis of the exact atomic eigenstates a nd treatHhfsas a perturbation in this basis. The result can be presented in the form M1hfs=/summationdisplay α/angbracketleft/tildewider6s,F|Hhfs|α,F/angbracketright E6s−Eα/angbracketleftα,F|M1|/tildewider7s,F′/angbracketright +/summationdisplay β/angbracketleft/tildewider6s,F|M1|β,F′/angbracketright/angbracketleftβ,F′|Hhfs|/tildewider7s,F′/angbracketright Eβ−E7s. (13) Here|/tildewider6s/angbracketright,|/tildewider7s/angbracketright,|α/angbracketright,|β/angbracketrightare the eigenstates which include all possible configuratio n mixing, |α/angbracketrightand|β/angbracketrightmay contain an arbitrary number of pairs of excited electron s and holes in the electron core. All non-diagonal matrix elements of the M1 operator vanish in the non-relativistic limit. Moreover, it was demonstrated in o ur work [9] that the dominant contribution appears only in the second order in the spin-or bit interaction and in the first order in configuration mixing, i.e. non-diagonal M1 matrix elements are of the or- derM1∼(Zα)4Qin/E∼10−4−10−5|µB|, whereQinis the non-diagonal matrix ele- ment of the Coulomb interaction corresponding to an excitat ion of a core electron and Eis the energy of this excitation. Indeed, the operator of the magnetic moment is M1 =µB(L+2S) =µB(2J−L) (relativistic correction to this expression ∼10−5). Elec- tron wave functions are the eigenfunctions of the total elec tron angular momentum J. There- fore,Jdoes not give any non-diagonal matrix elements. On the other hand, the matrix ele- ment/angbracketleftα,J= 1/2|L|β,J= 1/2/angbracketrightrequires spin-orbit interaction both in the bra /angbracketleftα,J= 1/2| and ket |β,J= 1/2/angbracketrightvectors, since in the non-relativistic limit they correspo nd to the total orbital angular momentum L= 0, i.e. L|α/angbracketright=L|β/angbracketright= 0. Thus, we need the second order in spin-orbit interaction. Note that the non-diagonal in angu lar momentum Lmatrix elements of the hyperfine interaction like /angbracketleft˜s1/2|Hhfs|˜d3/2/angbracketrightdo not help since in this case both the hfs matrix element and M1 matrix element /angbracketleft˜s1/2|M1|˜d3/2/angbracketrightare very small. Non-diagonal matrix elements of M1 were calculated in Refs. [9,10]; the value /angbracketleft6s|M1|7s/angbracketright ≈0.4×10−4|µB|was measured in Refs. [17,5,18]. Thus, each term with the non-diagonal M1 matrix element in eq. (13) is suppressed by a factor of 10−4−10−5. Therefore, we may safely assume that the correction to the di agonalM1 contribution (3) does not exceed 10−3. We should note that it may not be easy to come to this conclusio n using perturbation theory in the Dirac basis of electron orbitals ( jjscheme) (Dirac basis was used in Ref. [6]). In this basis the small result must appear due to strong cance llations between different terms in the sum over intermediate states. III. MANY-BODY CALCULATIONS To test the validity of the square root formula (7) we perform ed accurate many-body relativistic calculations of the off-diagonal and diagonal hfs matrix elements. Detailed dis- cussion of the accurate hfs calculations can be found elsewh ere [12]. Here we repeat the main points emphasizing the role of different many-body effec ts. 6We start calculations from the relativistic Hartree-Fock ( RHF) method in the VN−1ap- proximation (calculations for the external electron are ca rried out in the frozen self-consistent field of the core ). The core polarization is calculated using the Hartree-Fock equations in an external field [14]. It is equivalent to the well-known ran dom-phase approximation with exchange method (see, e.g. [16]). The many-body effects such as the Brueckner-type cor- relations, and the structural radiation are included by mea ns of the correlation potential method [15]. As it was pointed out in the previous section, th e Brueckner-type correlation corrections are included by solving the Dyson-type equatio n for the states of the external electron (HHF+ˆΣ−E)ψ= 0. (14) Correlation potential ˆΣ accounts for the correlation between an external electron and core electrons. We use many body perturbation theory and the Feyn man diagram technique to calculate ˆΣ [12,19]. The perturbation expansion of ˆΣ in the residual Coulomb interac- tion starts from the second order. The corresponding diagra ms are presented on Fig. 1. We include both the second order diagrams and three dominati ng classes of higher order correlations: 1. Screening of the Coulomb interaction between an external electron and core electrons by other core electrons. This is a collective phenomenon and the corresponding chain of diagrams is enhanced by a factor approximately equal to th e number of electrons in the external closed subshell (the 5 pelectrons on Cs). We stress that our approach takes into account screening diagrams with double, triple a nd higher core electron excitations in contrast to the popular coupled cluster meth od where only double and selected triple excitations are considered (see, e.g. [13] ). The effect of screening is taken into account in all orders by summation of the correspo nding chain of diagrams which in the Feynman digram technique form a matrix geometri cal progression. 2. Hole-particle interaction in the core polarization oper ator. This effect is enhanced by the large zero-multipolarity diagonal matrix elements o f the Coulomb interaction. We take it into account by amending the direct Hartree-Fock p otential in which the polarization operator is calculated. 3. Iterations of the self-energy operator ( ˆΣ). This chain of diagrams describes the non- linear effects of the correlation potential and is enhanced b y the small denominator, which is the excitation energy of an external electron (in co mparison with the excita- tion energy of a core electron). The iterations of ˆΣ are included by solving equation (14). Substituting the Brueckner orbitals into eq. (6) accounts f or the dominating correlation corrections to the hfs. Corresponding diagrams are present ed on Fig. 2. These corrections constitutes 23% of the hfs of the 6 sstate of Cs and 12% of the hfs of the 7 sstate of Cs. To take into account the core polarization effect we self-con sistently solve the Hartree- Fock equation for the core states in the nuclear magnetic fiel d. The details are presented in Ref. [14]. When all corrections δψnto core states caused by the magnetic field are found, they are used to calculate the correction δVto the Hartree-Fock potential. Then core 7polarization is included into the single-electron matrix e lement /angbracketlefta|Hhfs|b/angbracketrightbetween valence states |a/angbracketrightand|b/angbracketrightby redefining the operator of the hfs interaction H′ hfs=Hhfs+δV. This corresponds to the summation of the infinite series of the RPA -type of diagrams presented on Fig. 3. The RPA-type core polarization contribution to th e hfs of the 6 sand 7sstates of Cs is about 15%. Core polarization also leads to the change of ˆΣ. Corresponding contributions to the hfs matrix element /angbracketlefta|δˆΣ|b/angbracketrightare often called structural radiation. Second order diagra ms for structure radiation are presented on Fig. 4. We use direct su mmation over the complete set of single-electron states to calculate these diagrams. There is also a contribution to the hfs due to the change of nor malization of the wave function caused by ˆΣ. This contribution can be written in a form Anorm=1 2/angbracketlefta|Hhfs|b/angbracketright(/angbracketlefta|∂ˆΣ/∂E|a/angbracketright+/angbracketleftb|∂ˆΣ/∂E|b/angbracketright). (15) The combined contribution of the structural radiation and r enormalization into the hfs of the 6sand 7sstates of Cs are 1.5% and 0.6% respectively. When all dominating higher-order correlations are include d into the calculation of the Brueckner orbitals for the 6 sand 7sstates of cesium, the accuracy for the calculated energies of these states is very high and constitutes about 0.1%. Howe ver, we introduced fitting parameters to re-scale ˆΣ to fit the energies exactly. This procedure allows us to effec tively include some omitted higher order correlations and to test t he sensitivity of the hfs matrix elements on the value of ˆΣ. The results for the hfs are presented in Table I. In this table h≡Hhfs, the matrix elements of δVare RPA-type corrections, the matrix elements of δˆΣ are structural radiation (including renormalization (15)), matrix elements with ψBrinclude Brueckner-type corre- lation corrections. One can see that the correction to the sq uare root formula due to the considered many-body effects does not exceed 4 .4×10−4. When all dominating many-body effects are taken into account the accuracy of the calculated hfs constants compared to ex- periment is about 1%. However the square root formula is stil l valid to the accuracy of about 10−4. The most likely cause of the remaining discrepancy with exp eriment is higher-order correlation corrections not included in our calculations. These corrections are localized on the radius of the core and due to the fact that these correctio ns are very small ( ∼1% of the experimental hfs) it is extremely unlikely that they can break the square root formula. The same may be said about the very small radiative and Breit c orrections. Note that our final results for the diagonal hfs matrix elements for the 6 sand 7sstates are in very good agreement with the calculations of the Notre-Dame group [13 ]. It follows from the above that the correction to the square ro ot formula is about an order of magnitude smaller than the estimations of Bouchiat and Gu´ ena [7]. However, there is no formal disagreement between the results, since B ouchiat and Gu´ ena estimated the uncertainty of their result to be equal to the correction itself. We believe that for the analysis of the PNC experiment it is safer to assume no correc tion to the square root formula. This slightly changes the numbers. The M1hfsamplitude, tensor polarizability βand weak charge of the133Cs nucleus become M1hfs=|µB c|0.8074(8) ×10−5, 8β= 26.957(43)(27) a3 0, (16) QW=−71.88(28)(29). To stress the importance of the result here we used an estimat e of the theoretical accuracy 0.4% [1] in the value of kPNC. Our result for M1hfsis in very good agreement with the result of Derevianko et al[11] M1hfs=|µB c|0.8070(73) ×10−5, (17) but has the better accuracy. The weak nuclear charge QWin (16) represents even larger deviation from the Standard Model value QW=−73.20(13) [8] than the result presented by Bennett and Wieman [1]. The deviation is 2 .9σif 0.4% accuracy of calculations of the kPNCis assumed. Note that even if 1% accuracy is assumed for the ca lculated value of kPNCas it was claimed in both theoretical works [3,4] then there i s still 1.5σdeviation from the Standard Model. However, we would like to stress once mor e that before making any conclusions about agreement or disagreement with the Stand ard Model the question about the accuracy of the atomic calculations of the PNC electroni c matrix element kPNC(see (1)) should be carefully re-analyzed. 9REFERENCES [1] S. C. Bennett and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2484 (1999); 82, 4153(E) (1999); 83, 889(E) (1999). [2] C. S. Wood et al., Science 275, 1759 (1997). [3] V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and O. P. Sushkov, Phys. Lett. A141, 147 (1989). [4] S. A. Blundell, W. R. Johnson, and J. Sapirstein, Phys. Re v. Lett. 65, 1411 (1990). [5] M.-A. Bouchiat, J. Gu´ ena, and L. Pottier, J. Phys. Lett. (Paris) 45, L-61 (1984). [6] C. Bouchiat and C. A. Piketty, J. Phys. (Paris) 49, 1851 (1988). [7] M.-A. Bouchiat and J. Gu´ ena, J. Phys. (Paris) 49, 2037 (1988). [8] W. J. Marciano and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2963 (1990); 68, 898(E) (1992). [9] V. V. Flambaum, I. B. Khriplovich, and O. P. Sushkov, Phys . Lett. 67A, 177 (1978); Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. (Sov. Phys. JETP) 75, 75 (1978). [10] V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum , P.G. Silvestrov, and O. P. Su shkov, Phys. Scr., 31, 275 (1985). [11] A. Derevianko, M. S. Safronova, and W. R. Johnson, Phys. Rev. A 60, R1741 (1999). [12] V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, A. Ya. Kraftmakher, and O. P. Sushkov, Phys. Lett. A 142, 373 (1989). [13] M. S. Safronova, W. R. Johnson, and A. Derevianko, Phys. Rev. A 60, 4476 (1999). [14] V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and O. P. Sushkov, J. Phys. B 17, 1953 (1984). [15] V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, P. G. Silvestrov, and O. P. Su shkov, J. Phys. B 20, 1399 (1987). [16] Random-phase approximation; see, e.g. M Ya. Amusia and N. A. Cherepkov, Case Studies in Atomic Physics, 5, 47 (1975). [17] J. Hoffnagle, L. Ph. Rvesch, V. L. Telegdi, and A. Weis, VI II ICAP, Abstracts, p. A33, Goteborg, Sweden (1982). [18] S. L. Gilbert, R. N. Watts, and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. A 29, 137 (1984). [19] V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and O. P. Sushkov, Phys. Lett . A140, 493 (1989). [20] E. Arimondo, M. Inguscio, and P. Violino, Rev. Mod. Phys .49, 31 (1977); S. L. Gilbert, R. N. Watts, and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. A 27, 581 (1983). 10TABLES TABLE I. Hyperfine structure matrix elements for the 6S and 7S states of133Cs (MHz). Approximation A6SA7S√A6SA7S/angbracketleft6S|h|7S/angbracketright/angbracketleft6S|h|7S/angbracketright√A6SA7S−1 ψ=ψHF /angbracketleftψ|h|ψ/angbracketright 1424.8 391.5 746.9 746.9 0 /angbracketleftψ|h+δV|ψ/angbracketright 1712.5 469.7 896.9 897.1 2 .2×10−4 /angbracketleftψ|h+δV+δˆΣ|ψ/angbracketright1687.8 466.9 887.7 887.6 1 .1×10−4 ψ=ψBr /angbracketleftψ|h|ψ/angbracketright 1952.4 459.5 947.2 947.2 0 /angbracketleftψ|h+δV|ψ/angbracketright 2302.0 541.4 1116.3 1116.7 3 .5×10−4 /angbracketleftψ|h+δV+δˆΣ|ψ/angbracketright2267.6 537.7 1104.3 1104.5 1 .8×10−4 ψ=ψfita/angbracketleftψ|h+δV|ψ/angbracketright 2308.3 542.5 1119.0 1119.5 4 .4×10−4 /angbracketleftψ|h+δV+δˆΣ|ψ/angbracketright2273.8 538.8 1106.9 1107.3 3 .6×10−4 SDpTb2278.5 540.6 1109.8 Experimentc2298.2 545.9 1120.1 aBrueckner orbitals with ˆΣ operator rescaled to fit the energy. bSingle, double and partly triple excitation approximation ; calculations by the Notre-Dame group, reference [13] cReference [20] 11FIGURES FIG. 1. Second-order diagrams for the self-energy of the val ence electron ( ˆΣ operator). Dashed line is the Coulomb interaction between core and valence ele ctrons. Loop is the polarization of the atomic core which corresponds to the virtual creation of the excited electron and a hole in the core shells. Σ Σ FIG. 2. Bruckner-type correlation diagrams for the hfs. Cro ss denotes the hfs interaction. The Σ operator includes second-order diagrams (Fig.1) and high er-order diagrams as described in the text. FIG. 3. Core polarization (RPA) diagrams for the hfs in the fir st and second order in Coulomb interaction. 12FIG. 4. Structural radiation 13

arXiv:physics/0005039v1 [physics.ins-det] 15 May 2000PHOTON SENSITIVITY OF SUPERHEATED DROP AT ROOM TEMPERATURE B.Roy, Mala Das, S.C. Roy and B.K. Chatterjee Department of Physics, Bose Institute, Calcutta 700 009, In dia Abstract It has been reported so far that superheated drops made of R-1 2 at room temperature are sensitive to neutrons yet insensitive to ph otons. This prop- erty makes its use as one of the most useful neutron dosimeter . The photon sensitivity of R-12 at room temperature (25oC) when exposed to 59.54 keV photons obtained from radioactive241Amhas been noted for the first time in our laboratory. This discovery is important not only from th e point of view of basic science but more important to the users of R-12 in neutr on dosimetry to take note of this in assessing the neutron dose correctly. Th is discovery also indicates a new direction of investigation with R-12 detect or. Superheated drops are known to detect energetic radiations [1,2,3]. Among the various liquids studied, R-12 (dichlorodifluoromethane) i s found to be the most widely used material in neutron dosimetry in view of its capability to detect thermal to fast neutrons at room temperature yet insensitive to gamma rays. Apfel[4] observed R-12 to be insensitive to gamma rays at room temperature when expo sed to strong60Co source and assumed its gamma ray sensitivity for photons onl y above 6 MeV, when its energy is comparable to the binding energy per nucleon th us producing neutrons, through photo-nuclear reactions[5]. Ing et.al.[3] also fo und R-12 to be insensitive to gamma rays when exposed to a strong radioactive60Cosource. According to the empirical relationship suggetsed by d’Err ico et. al.[6], super- heated liquid becomes sensitive to photons at a temperature close to the midpoint between its boiling point and critical temperature. Theref ore, according to this rela- tion, R-12 (b.p. -29.79oC,Tc. 112oC) should exhibit photon sensitivity close to about 41oC. Contrary to all these predictions, the present work demons trates the sensitiv- ity of R12 detector to gamma rays at room temperature (25oC), when exposed to 59.54 keV photons obtained from a radioactive241Am. In this work, R12 drops have been suspended homogeneously in a viscoelastic gel as has been reported elsewhere[7]. R-12 sample thus prep ared, taken in a 15ml 1glass vial was exposed to gamma rays (59.54kev) from241Am(0.5Ci) at an average room temperature of 25oCand the nucleation was observed by counting the num- ber (N) of drops vaporised per minute (t). This was done by det ecting the pressure pulse produced due to each drop vaporisation with the help of a piezo-electric trans- ducer[8], coupled to a drop counter and multichannel scaler (MCS). The nucleation rate (dN/dt) has been recorded continuously in MCS. The resu lts presented in figure 1 shows nucleation rate (dN/dt) with time (t). The nucleatio n rate at any time is proportional to the flux of incoming photons and the number of drops present in the sample at that time. Therefore dN/dt decreases with time as n ucleation proceeds. Nucleations due to background radiations and due to the pres ence of hetero- geneous nucleation sites, if any, have been recorded for 65 m inutes at the beginning of the experiment. The radioactive241Amwas then placed very close to the detector (at a distance of 1.2 cm from the centre of the detector vial) t o observe the nucleation prominently and the nucleation rate was noted. Nucleation d ue to background was noted again after removing the radioactive source. As can be seen from Fig. 1, there is significant increase in nucleation above background when the source is placed near the detector, thus confirming the gamma ray sensitivity of R- 12 at room temperature. However, the efficiency of R-12 for detecting such photons at r oom temperature is quite small as has been observed experimentally. When the pr esent source was placed at a distance greater than 2.5cm from the centre of the vial (c ontaining R-12 drops) there was no nucleation. In a seperate experiment, the R-12 sample was exposed to 32.5 mCi137Cs (662keV) and 0.45 mCi60Co(average energy of 1225 keV), and no nucleation was noted. This result confirms the earlier observation of Apfel [5] and Ing et. al.[3]. One may ask why R-12 is sensitive to low energy photons rather than higher energies at room temperature. The answer lies on the nature o f interaction of photons with matter. Gamma rays are detected by the initiation of vap our bubbles caused by the energy deposition of electrons produced by photons wh ile passing through the liquid. Looking at the linear energy transfer (dE/dx) of ele ctrons at these energies (from tens of keVs to close to 1 MeV), one may find that dE/dx is l arger at lower energies than higher electron energies. Therefore the ener gy deposition in the liquid is larger for lower energy photons and favourable for nuclea tion compared to higher energy photons. As the temperature of the detector sample in creases, the degree of superheat of the liquid increases and it requires lesser and lesser amount of energy for nucleation of drops. This explanation was found to be true in a seperate experiment, where the sample was found to be sensitive to higher energy ph otons (662 keV and 1225 keV) at higher temperatures. Complete investigation o n this subject will be reported elsewhere. The present discovery of the photon sensitivity of R-12 at ro om temperature opened up a new vista of investigation. More importantly thi s discovery demonstrates that it is wrong to assume that R-12 is insensitive to photons at room temperature 2and constitutes a valid warning to the users of R-12 as neutro n dosimeter while assessing the actual neutron dose. Further investigations on the sensitivity of R-12 to lower energy photons are needed. References. 1. R. E. Apfel US patent 4 143 274. (1979) 2. R. E. Apfel, S. C. Roy and Y. C. Lo Phys. Rev. A31, 3194 (1985). 3. H. Ing and H. C. Birnboim Nucl. Trac. Rad. Meas. 8, 285 (1984). 4. R. E. Apfel Nucl. Inst. Meth. 179, 615 (1981). 5. R. E. Apfel Nucl. Inst. Meth. 162, 603 (1979). 6. F. d’Errico, R. Nath, M. Lamba and K. S. Holland Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 1147 (1998). 7. B. Roy, B. K. Chatterjee and S. C. Roy Rad. Meas. 29, 173 (1997). 8. R. E. Apfel and S. C. Roy Rev. Sci. Instrum. 54, 1397 (1983). 3

arXiv:physics/0005040v1 [physics.atom-ph] 15 May 2000Irradiation of benzene molecules by ion-induced and light- induced intense fields D. Mathur Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, M umbai 400 005, India (November 18, 2013) Abstract Benzene, with its sea of delocalized π-electrons in the valence orbitals, is identified as an example of a class of molecules that enable es tablishment of the correspondence between intense ion-induced and laser- light-induced fields in experiments that probe ionization dynamics in temporal r egimes spanning the attosecond and picosecond ranges. Typeset using REVT EX 1Matter is inherently unstable when exposed to electric field s whose magnitudes approxi- mate interatomic Coulombic fields. Studies of the response o f matter to very intense fluxes of such fields address fundamental issues concerning the phy sics of systems driven strongly away from equilibrium. There are two approaches that enable terrestrial access to such fields, and their use in probing the ionization (and dissocia tion) dynamics of atoms (and molecules): use of fast, highly-charged beams of heavy ions on the one hand, and focused, intense laser light on the other. The equivalence of the two a pproaches has only been ex- plored in somewhat desultory fashion. The interaction of at oms and molecules with intense fields is clearly a complex nonperturbative, dynamical prob lem and prospects of rigorous theoretical treatment remain remote. Experimental inform ation, albeit of a morphologial nature, is, therefore, of considerable importance and inte rest. Specifically, it is necessary to identify a class of target species whose properties make t hem suitable for studies aimed at disentangling the important time-dependent aspects of t he field-target interaction from those that are ’static’ or structure-dependent, so that the prospects of gaining qualitative insights are improved. The time-dependent aspect of the fiel d-target interaction is especially of relevance in the case of molecules. Contemporary laser te chnology makes available intense light fields in pulses of picosecond ( ps) and femtosecond ( fs) duration. For molecules, these time scales are of significance in relation to typical rotati onal and vibrational time periods (tens of psand tens of fs, respectively). In the case of ion-induced fields, however, a beam of highly-charged ions traverses a distance of a few ˚A in only a few tens of attoseconds as, thereby opening prospects of studies of molecular dynamics on times scales in which even vibrational motions can be regarded as “frozen”. Moreover, these ultrashort times imply enormous uncertainties in energies, thereby opening new av enues of molecular dynamics studies that fall well outside the ambit of conventional mol ecular quantum mechanics. We report in this Letter results of a study that suggests that be nzene, with its sea of delocalized π-electrons in the valence orbitals, constitutes a molecule that enables establishment of the correspondence between intense ion-induced and laser-lig ht-induced fields in experimental probes of the ionization dynamics in temporal regimes that s pan the asandpsranges. The correspondence between ion-induced and light-induced fields can most usefully be established by considering three temporal regimes. In the c ase of relativistic ion beams (whose energy ∼GeV/nucleon, β=v/c∼1) colliding with atoms or molecules, the Weizs¨ acker- Williams equivalent photon model [1] transforms the Coulom bic field in the projectile’s rest frame to the target’s rest frame, and equates the effect of the field to two, orthogonally- directed photon pulses. Application of such equivalent-ph oton pulses to atomic ionization have recently attracted attention [2]. At the opposite temp oral extreme, purely electrostatic considerations use Coulomb’s law; for instance, in the case of Si3+projectiles, a target atom experiences a field of magnitude ∼5 V˚A−1(∼0.1 a.u.) at a distance of 3 ˚A. In the inter- mediate regime, one that is experimentally most accessible using highly-charged ion beams of MeV energy, the effective ion-induced electric field exper ienced by a target may be de- duced from the Poynting vector: Ieff(t) =1 µ0|/vectorE(t)×/vectorB(t)|. Following the pioneering work of Rhodes and coworkers in this regime [3], recent work has focu sed on observing similarities and differences between ion-induced and laser-induced ioni zation patterns in molecules like water and chloromethanes of different symmetries [4]. For H 2O, the morphology of the dis- sociative ionization pattern was found to be grossly differe nt in the two cases. Differences in the case of the chloromethanes were much less, but were still significant. These differences 2may be rationalized either by noting that the directional pr operties of the applied field are different in the two cases, or by invoking the different tempor al profiles of the applied fields. Although the magnitudes of the ion-induced and light-induc ed fields were almost identical in these experiments, the directional properties of the two types of field were different in the following sense: the laser light was linearly-polarize d and so, the direction of the light- induced field was constant in the course of the interaction, u nlike the time-dependence that is intrinsic to the direction of the ion-induced field. There is some evidence that, in the case of laser-molecule interactions, the directional properti es of the applied field can influence molecular dissociation pathways [5]. Other factors, such a s indirect ionization events (in- volving intermediate electron capture and loss) in the case of the ion-impact experiments, can be discounted by judicious choice of collision energy (a nd, as indicated below, by sup- plementary measurements made, under identical operating c onditions, on well-understood collision systems involving rare-gas targets). Before presenting results that demonstrate the good corres pondence between ion-induced and light-induced ionization patterns of C6H6, it is important to address other facets of the equivalence we explore, namely the peak field intensity and t he temporal/spatial features for the two types of fields. Our ion-impact experiments used fast beams of mass-selected, highly- charged ions (Siq+,q=3,8 at an energy of 50-100 MeV) that were obtained from a tand em accelerator. Slow recoil ions resulting from large impact- parameter interactions between the projectile ions and C6H6vapor were extracted, with unit collection efficiency, into a linear time-of-flight (TOF) spectrometer located in a direction th at was orthogonal to the incident ion beam. The methodology has been described previously [4] . Experiments were also performed with F7+projectiles at an energy of 110 MeV, and in these the ion analy sis and detection was with quadrupole mass filter (all other experim ental features being similar). In the laser-based experiments, light pulses (of 35 ps and 100 f s duration), from high-intensity Nd:YAG and Ti:sapphire lasers, were focused by a biconvex le ns of 10 cm focal length such that peak intensities within the focal volume were in the ran ge 1012-1016W cm−2. Ions produced in the focal volume were extracted, again at 90◦to the incident laser beam, and analyzed by a 2-field TOF set-up. One important facet of the comparison of ion-induced and lig ht-induced ionization dy- namics is the quantification of the peak magnitude of the appl ied field. A limiting value of the impact parameter, b, has to be deduced for each ion-collision system. However, f or molecular targets, bremains a somewhat elusive parameter. The range of b-values that come into play manifests itself in the mean recoil energy ( Er) that is imparted to each molecular ion that is created in the interaction. This, in turn, is refle cted in the temporal width of molecualar ion peaks in the measured TOF spectrum. In the cas e ofC6H+ 6ions formed in our experiments with Siq+(q=3,8) projectiles, we measured Erto lie in the range 30-40 meV. There is an established method [6], based on classical traje ctory Monte-Carlo techniques [7], that enables deductions to be made of the impact parameter de pendence of multiple ioniza- tion probabilities in fast-ion collisions. A value of 3 ˚A was deduced as the lower limit for bin our experiments. Collisions that occur at smaller b-values give rise to recoil energies far in excess of Er, and these are discriminated against by the angular resolut ion of the spectrometers used by us. We confirmed the veracity of our ded uctions of bby determining total cross sections for formation of low-energy Arq+recoils ( q=1-10) in the same apparatus. Deduction of bcan also be complicated by electron capture and loss process es that might 3influence the formation of recoils in charge state q >1. However, it was confirmed that for a range of ions (namely, Siq+,q=3-12), direct ionization dominated the overall dynamics. By way of example, we cite the measured the total cross section f or Ar4+formation in Si10+-Ar collisions to be 8 ×10−17cm2; corresponding cross sections for Ar4+formation accompanied by 1-electron capture and loss were 3 ×10−18cm2and 7 ×10−19cm2, respectively. For C6H6- ion collisions at 50-110 MeV, the domination of direct ioniz ation processes is likely to be even more pronounced. For the light-field experiments, determination of the peak fi eld value is somewhat less difficult, but note the following facet that has hitherto not b een widely acknowledged. Just as the ion- C6H6interaction accesses a range of b-values ( b >3˚A), and, hence, exposes the molecules in the interaction zone to a corresponding range o f applied fields, so in the laser case there is a spatial distribution of intensities that giv es rise to a corresponding distribution of fields. Such spatial distribution of the laser-induced fie ld, and the ion distribution that results from it, was measured using a method that has recentl y been described in detail [8]. The spatial field distributions obtained in both the ion-imp act and laser-based experiments are shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. For convenience of c omparison, we express the field magnitude obtained in the ion-impact experiments in terms o f an effective intensity that can be directly compared with an easily-determined paramet er in the laser experiments, namely the light intensity. Judicious choice of operating c onditions enable the spatial field distributions to be very similar in the two sets of experimen ts. The examples shown are for a 100-MeV beam of Si8+ions, readily accessed in tandem accelerators, and for a 100 -fs long laser pulse of peak intensity 2 ×1015W cm−2, accessed by focusing a 1 mJ beam of 806 nm wavelength from a Ti:sapphire laser to a spot size of ∼25µm. Fig. 3 shows typical ionic fragmentation patterns obtained when C6H6is irradiated by 100-MeV Si3+ions and 35-ps-long laser pulses of 532 nm wavelength. The pe ak intensity in the latter case was ∼8×1013W cm−2and, by using a small (2 mm) aperture at the entrance of our TOF spectrometer, the lower part of the inten sity range that we accessed was∼5×1012W cm−2. In the case of the ion impact data, the peak value of effective intensity at an impact parameter of 3 ˚A was ∼5×1014W cm−2. We also conducted experiments with Si8+and F7+ions, and with 100-fs duration laser pulses (of 806 nm wavele ngth), with peak intensities in the range 1013-5×1016W cm−2. The gross features of the measured ionic fragmentation patterns remained essentially unaltered un der all these conditions, although the highest laser intensities gave rise to a larger degree of multiple ionization (that could also be directly correlated with ion beam data). Illustrative da ta are shown in Fig. 4, for 110 MeV Si8+impact and irradiation by 100fs laser pulses of intensity 5 ×1015W cm−2. Here, a larger (15 mm) aperture was used at the entrance of our TOF sp ectrometer in our laser experiments, thereby giving access to the entire intensity range shown in Fig. 2. Recent work [8] has shown that the lower-intensity portions of this range dominate the overall dynamics because a very much larger proportion of the focal v olume that is accessed by the spectrometer samples the lowest intensities. Under these c ircumstances, the contribution of the parent C6H+ 6ion to the mas spectrum is very much enhanced (not shown in the figure). The central portion of the focal volume samples the peak inte nsity region and, consequently, multiple ionization events are also more in evidence in the s pectrum shown in Fig. 4. A noteworthy feature is the somewhat unexpected preponderen ce of H+and H+ 2fragments, indicating that extremely energetic proceeses occur in thi s intensity regime that overcomes 4the intrinsic strength of the aromatic ring structure and ca uses extensive fragmentation, opening dissociation channels that are seldom accessed in e lectron impact experiments. In order to preclude the possiblity of diverting from the main f ocus of attention in this Letter, we refrain from discussing the details of the ionic fragment ation patterns (such discussion can be found in the context of nsandpslaser-induced fragmentation of C6H6in ref. [9]). We focus on the fact that the data presented here clearly does show a surprising degree of similarlity in the morphology of the ion-induced and light- induced fragmentation patterns. So, what lessons are to be drawn from our attempts to study the correspondence between ion-induced and light-induced strong fields and their effect on molecular dynamics? Clearly, the first lesson is that the observed similarities in the mass spectra show that this correspon- dence is worthy of further pursuit, notwithstanding the “ob vious” differences in the nature of the fields generated by non-relativistic charged particl e beams and pure electromagnetic radiation. The second lesson originates in the practical co nsideration that irradiation of matter by either type of field entails exposure to a range of field intensities; single-valued fields are unlikely to be encountered, either in nature or in t he laboratory. The spatial vari- ation of field intensity gives rise to “focal volume effects” a md makes it mandatory to ensure that equivalent intensity ranges are accessed in studies of field-matter interactions in order to make meaningful comparisons about the effects on the overa ll dynamics of the time du- ration of each type of field. We believe that we have succeeded in achieving this equivalence in our experiments. The somewhat surprising result to emerg e is that, at least for C6H6, whether the intense field is of picosecond or attosecond dura tion is of little consequence as far as the overall ionic fragmentation pattern is concerned . Thirdly, the other major differ- ence between the two types of fields concerns their direction al properties: the laser-induced field has a well-defined direction as it originate in light tha t is linearly-polarized. But, the direction of the ion-induced field changes in the course of th e collision process. Our data indicate that these properties seem unimportant to the over all dynamics. It may be argued that for ion-induced fields the change of direction is too fas t to be of consequence. Can our results be interpreted within the framework of molec ular quantum mechanics? One attempt has been made to study intense laser-induced ion ic fragmentation within the framework of molecular orbital energies [10], but applicat ion of fields that last only for, say 30 as, implies an energy uncertainty of ∼22 eV. This makes quantal treatments of the ionization dynamics with conventional molecular states ir relevant. Gratitude is expressed to colleagues who have contributed t heir mite to the accelerator- based and intense-laser experiments on molecules in the cou rse of several years: F. A. Rajgara, V. R. Bhardwaj, G. Ravindra Kumar, U. T. Raheja, V. K rishnamurthi, C. Badri- nathan, K. Vijayalakshmi, S. Banerjee, C. P. Safvan, M. Kris hnamurthy, V. Kumarappan, E. Krishnakumar, K. Nagesha, and A. K. Sinha. The high-energ y femtosecond laser was partially funded by the Department of Science and Technolog y. Some experiments were conducted at the Nuclear Science Centre, New Delhi. 5REFERENCES [1] J. D. Jackson, in Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1962), Chap. 15. [2] S. Keller et al., Phys. Rev. A 55, 4215 (1997), R. Moshammer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3621 (1997). [3] K. Boyer et al., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 16, 541 (1988), T. S. Luk et al., Phys. Rev. A48, 1359 (1993). [4] V. R. Bhardwaj et al., Phys. Rev. A 58, 3849 (1998), ibid.59, 3105 (1999). [5] D. Mathur et al., Phys. Rev. A 50, R7 (1994), J. Phys. B 27, L603 (1994). [6] T. Tonuma et al., J. Phys. B 17, L317 (1984). [7] A. S. Schlachter et al., Phys. Scr. T3, 143 (1983). [8] S. Banerjee et al., J. Phys. B 32, 4277 (1999), Phys. Rev. A 60, R3369 (1999). [9] V. R. Bhardwaj et al., Phys. Rev. A 59, 1392 (1999), H. J. Neusser et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 60, 147 (1984), and references therein. [10] H. Rottke et al., J. Phys. B 31, 1083 (1998). 6FIGURES FIG. 1. The radial and axial distribution of applied field wit hin the interaction volume for Si8+-C6H6collisions. The magnitude of the field is expressed in terms o f an effective intensity in order to aid comparison with the equivalent distribution pa ttern obtained in laser- C6H6interac- tions. FIG. 2. The spatial distribution of applied field within the f ocal volume for laser- C6H6inter- actions (see text). FIG. 3. Ion fragmentation patterns obtained upon irradiati on of C6H6by a) 100-MeV Si3+ ions (similar patterns were obtained using Si8+and F7+ions), and b) 35-ps-long laser pulses of 532 nm wavelength and peak intensity of 8 ×1013W cm−2. FIG. 4. Fragmentation of C6H6by a) 110-MeV Si8+ions and b) 100-fs-long laser pulses of 806 nm wavelength and peak intensity of 5 ×1015W cm−2. 705001000 2.03.55.06.58.0C2+ C5Hx +C6Hx + C4Hx +C3Hx + C2Hx +C+ Flight time (µs) Yield (arb. units) 010000200003000040000 b)a) C2+C2Hx 3+C2Hx 2+C+ C3Hx 2+C2Hx + C3Hx + C4Hx +C5Hx + C6Hx +01.53.04.56.07.5 100 200 300 Flight time (ns) Yield (arb. units)100020003000 H+ b)a) C3Hx 2+ C+, CHx +C3+C4+H2 + C2Hx 3+C2+

arXiv:physics/0005041v1 [physics.class-ph] 15 May 2000Axioms for Mach’s mechanics Adonai S. Sant’Anna∗Clovis A. S. Maia† Dep. Matem´ atica, UFPR, C.P. 019081, Curitiba, PR, 81531-9 90, Brazil. Abstract We present an axiomatic framework for what we call Mach’s mec hanics, inspired on the ideas by A. K. T. Assis and P. Graneau about rel ational mechanics. We show that contrarily to what is suggested by th ese authors, Mach’s principle does not need to be committed with any Weber ’s like gravitational force. Actually it is possible to settle an ax iomatic framework for non-relativistic classical particle mechanics which i ncorporates Mach’s principle and is consistent with any force that obeys the new tonian action- reaction principle. We make further criticisms concerning relational me- chanics. 1 Introduction Discussions about the foundations of physics seem to be endl ess. From Aris- totelian mechanics to superstrings, there have been always criticisms, doubts, writings, and discussions about the philosophical, physic al, logical and mathe- matical foundations of physics. This journal itself suppor ts such discussions. But if we take a look on the history of mechanics, which correspon ds to just a portion of physics, we can see how difficult is to understand even class ical mechanics, which is, maybe, the most intuitive of all physical sciences . An excellent review that illustrates these ideas is [8]. We are not only talking a bout the history of classical mechanics. We are talking about the great difficult y to coordinate the relations between mathematical models and physically mean ingful sentences. Probably the best way to settle a common language in order to m ake such foundational discussions easier is through the correct (im plicit or explicit) use of the axiomatic method. In this paper we are focused on the prob lem of the origin of inertia. We want to discuss about this subject from the axi omatic point of view. ∗To whom correspondence should be sent. E-mail: adonai@scie ntist.com URL: http://www.geocities.com/adonaisantanna/adonaiss.ht ml †E-mail: clovis@fisica.ufpr.br 1Discussions about the foundations of classical mechanics a re not new. Some late 19th century physicists, for example, considered that force was an anthro- pomorphic or metaphysical concept that should be eliminate d from mechanics. There was a strong influence of Kantianism among several germ an physicists like E. Mach, H. L. Helmholtz and H. R. Hertz, regarding the coordi nating relations of thoughts to facts. The concept of force seemed to have a hyp othetical and unobservable status. In Hertz’s Principles of Classical Mechanics [11], originaly published in 1894 [10], the author showed to be dissatisfied w ith the obscurity lurking in the concept of force. He presented a formulation o f classical particle mechanics where the concept of force is not primitive. In [19 ] we presented an axiomatic framework for a classical particle mechanics sys tem inspired on Hertz’s ideas about mechanics. In the present paper we show an axioma tic framework for classical particle mechanics systems inspired on Mach’ s ideas about the origin of inertia. As a matter of fact, our main motivation is the wor k by A. K. T. Assis and P. Graneau [4], where they claim that the celebrated expe rience with New- ton’s bucket could not be explained, from the physical point of view, by means of a motion with respect to an absolute space. Matter interac ts with matter and not with space. Such an idea could be identified with a Mach ’s principle of inertia. Rigorously speaking, there is nothing in the writings of E. M ach which could be called Mach’s principle. But since he was one of the most in fluencial criticists about the absolute newtonian space, and since many authors h ave suggested that there is some sort of Mach’s principle with respect to inertia (for some reviews, see [2], [4] [5]), we state, in this paper, as Mach’s principl e the following: The inertia of a material body is due to its interaction with o ther material bodies. We recognize that such a sentence should be made precise, in t he sense that we should present a rigorous definition of inertia ,material body andinterac- tion. Nevertheless, we are very confident that the sentence given above may be identified by many physicists as something which we could cal l Mach’s principle. Besides, this principle seems to be physically meaningful i n an intuitive level. It seems to be more natural an interaction of matter with matter than matter with (absolute) space, at least into the context of a non-relativ istic theory. In this paper we make some criticisms concerning the impleme ntation of Mach’s principle as proposed in [4]. Next, with the help of th e axiomatic method, we implement some sort of Mach’s principle in classical part icle mechanics in a mathematically rigorous fashion. We call our axiomatic sy stem as Mach’s mechanics ormachian mechanics . We show, for example, that contrarily to what is done in [4], Mach’s principle does not need to be commi tted with any Weber’s like gravitational force. Besides, Mach’s mechani cs is consistent with 2any kind of force which obeys the newtonian action-reaction principle, including Newton’s gravitational force itself. One of the main purposes of this paper is to illustrate the met hodological power of the axiomatic method in physics. The axiomatic meth od is the soul of mathematics, the synthesis of the scientific method, and a po werful language for the scientific philosopher. The logical investigations of p hysical theories allows us to discuss what can be done and what cannot be done in physic s, from the mathematical point of view. For example, can we abandon the u sual notions of space and time in physics [20]? Can we abandon the notion of force from mechanics [19]? Can we incorporate Mach’s principle of iner tia independently of any gravitational force? In the present paper we answer this last question; and such an answer is positive. 2 Relational Mechanics In [4] it is presented a relational mechanics which is supposed to incorporate Mach’s principle. According to the authors such a relationa l mechanics should satisfy the following ‘axioms’: 1. Force does satisfy the standard newtonian action-reacti on principle. 2. The summation of all forces over a material body is always n ull in all frames. It is quite obvious that these sentences are not axioms at all , from the logico- mathematical point of view [17]. Nevertheless they may help us to understand relational mechanics. According to [4], any implementation of Mach’s principle in relational me- chanics is not possible if we use the newtonian gravitationa l force and consider that the distant material bodies, like those outside the Mil ky Way, may be re- garded as an isotropical distribution of matter around any m aterial body pin, e.g., Earth. The resultant force on pdue to this isotropical distribution of mass should be zero, according to Newton’s gravitation law. So, t he second ‘axiom’ above would never be satisfied if pis subject to any other force like, e.g., its gravitational interaction with the planet Earth. One very n ice solution to this problem is presented in [4]. The authors suggest the use of a g ravitational force inspired on Weber’s electrodynamical interaction [3]: F12=−γm1m2r12 r3 12/parenleftBigg 1−6 c2/parenleftBigg ˙r2 12 2−r12¨r12/parenrightBigg/parenrightBigg , (1) where F12is the force that particle 2 exerts on particle 1, γmay be identified with the gravitational constant, cis the speed of light in the vacuum, m1andm2 3are respectively the (gravitational) masses of particles 1 and 2, r12=/bardblr12/bardblis the norm of the position vector of particle 1 with respect to part icle 2, and ˙ r12and ¨r12are respectively the velocity and the acceleration of parti cle 1 with respect to particle 2, which are coincident with the velocity and acc eleration of particle 2 with respect to particle 1. A most important implication of this Mach-Weber theory is the necessity of a large amount of uniformly distri buted matter in the universe. From now on we refer to equation (1) as Weber’s law o f gravitation or Weber’s gravitation law. Equation (1) was inspired on Weber’s electrodynamical forc e: F12=q1q2 4πε0r12 r3 12/parenleftBigg 1−˙r2 12 2c2+r12¨r12 c2/parenrightBigg , (2) where c= (ε0µ0)−1/2, and q1andq2are electric charges of particles 1 and 2 respectively. From equation (1) a straight calculation is made in order to d erive the grav- itational force on a material body (e.g., a particle) pwith mass m, due to its interaction with the isotropical part of the universe: FmI=−Φm/parenleftbigg ¨rmS+ωUS×(ωUS×rmS) + 2˙rmS×ωUS+rmS×dωUS dt/parenrightbigg , (3) where Φ =2π 3ξγρ0 H2 0, (4) H0is the Hubble’s constant, π≈3.14159, ρ0is the mean density of the universe, rmSis the position of particle pwith respect to an arbitrary coordinate system S,ωUSis the angular velocity of the isotropical distribution of d istant galaxies with respect to S, and tis the parameter time. The constant ξis relevant for deriving the precession of the perihelion of the planets. Fo r details see [4, 5]. IfS′is a coordinate system where ωUS′is zero then: FmI=−Φm¨rmS. (5) If particle pis subject to any force due to an anisotropical distribution ofN masses described by FmA=N/summationdisplay j=1Fmj, (6) then, according to the second ‘postulate’ of relational mec hanics, 4N/summationdisplay j=1Fmj=m¨rmS, (7) where Smay be any coordinate system which moves with a constant velo city with respect to the system of distant galaxies. So, Second Newton’s Law is a theorem and inertia of particle p(/summationtextN j=1Fmj) is a consequence of its interaction with the distant galaxie s. If the whole universe does have a rotation ωUSwith respect to an arbitrary system of coordinates, then the force that the anisotropica l part of the universe exerts on particle p(with mass m) is given by: FmI=−m/parenleftbigg ¨rmS+ωUS×(ωUS×rmS) + 2˙rmS×ωUS+rmS×dωUS dt/parenrightbigg .(8) This means that a rotating universe is capable of deforming t he surface of the water in Newton’s bucket, and so Mach’s principle is impl emented. Now, we proceed to some remarks and criticisms on this approa ch. Next we present solutions to the problems that we point out. 3 First Remarks and Criticisms We have some remarks and criticisms about the implementatio n of Mach’s prin- ciple as proposed in [4]: The first criticism referes to the fact that relational mecha nics cannot describe the dynamics of particles without the help of Weber’s gravit ation force. It is easy to see that the gravitation ` a la Weber, as presented in equat ion (1) is invariant under Galilean transformations if we assume that F12is also invariant. At a first sight, this looks like a redundant sentence, but that is not the case. The invariance of Newton’s law of gravitation, for example, is e asily proven if we keep in mind that 1. force is equal to mass times acceleration (for conservati ve masses) and 2. force is the gradient of a potential that depends on the dif erence between space coordinates. In other words, the potential (which depends on a relational concept, namely, the distance between particles) determines the dynamics of particles. In rela- tional mechanics, as proposed in [4] that does not occur, sin ce Weber’s gravita- tional force itself does not determine any dynamics of any pa rticle. There is no differential equation in relational mechanics analogous to Newton’s second law 5of mechanics. Assis and Graneau claim that Newton’s second l aw demands the notion of an absolute space that interacts with matter, whic h contradicts Mach’s principle. Nevertheless we should recall that Newton’s sec ond law does have a very important role, namely, to determine the dynamics of ma terial bodies as a function of the forces acting on them. Newton’s second law i s adifferential equation . We understand the criticisms against Newton’s second law. But we do not understand the absence of any differential equation in re lational mechanics that determines the dynamics of material bodies. As a matter of fact, there is no relational mechanics at all, since the dynamics of materi al bodies depends on Weber’s law of gravitation and on the use of a machian princip le that postulates an isotropical distribution of mass in the universe. Newton ian mechanics allows us to study the dynamics of particles for any gravitational l aw which obeys the action-reaction principle. In other words, newtonian mech anics is consistent with Newton’s gravitation law, Weber’s gravitation law and a lot of possibilities that we could imagine and propose. So, there is no relational mech anics, but there is a gravitational theory which postulates Weber’s law of grav itation and Mach’s principle, but without any underlying mechanics. The second criticism is the fact that in Assis and Graneau the ory that Mach’s principle cannot be implemented if we use the newtonian forc e of gravitation. These two criticisms may be summarized as it follows: in [4] t here is some sort of confusion between mechanics and gravitation. We have a proposal of a relational mechanics system, which we call Mach’s mechanics or machian mechanics, that allows us to solve the d ynamical problem presented in this section, preserves some of the main ideas b y Assis and Graneau and is still consistent with a newtonian law of gravitation. We use the axiomatic method in order to settle our language in a rigorous manner. F irst we present an axiomatic framework for particle mechanics inspired into n ewtonian mechanics. In section 6 we present an axiomatic framework for particle m echanics inspired on Mach’s principle. The axiomatization allows us a compariso n between newtonian and machian mechanics. 4 Further Criticisms: Problems of Symmetry Discussions on invariance in theoretical physics are rathe r important. Invariance of physical laws is grounded on an almost ‘holy’ principle us ually refered to as theprinciple of symmetry . This is one of the basis of experimental physics: there must be a manner to establish a communication channel a mong different observers. We want to focus our discussion on relational mec hanics from this point of view. 1. Webers’s gravitation law is an instantaneous action-at- a-distance force which is invariant under Galilean transformations, as we di scussed earlier 6and the reader can easily verify. Nevertheless, no instantaneous action-at- a-distance force can be invariant under Lorentz transforma tions, since the notion of simultaneity is relative to the observer, according to the special theory of relativity. 2. Weber’s electrodynamics is an instantaneous action-at- a-distance force too, which contradicts well known experimental data about accel erating elec- tric charges (like the case of the electrons in an antenna). I n this situation, there is no instantaneous interaction. Maxwell’s eletroma gnetism, which is supported by experience, stands up the existence of eletrom agnetic waves that propagate into the space with the speed of light in the va cuum. So, Maxwell’s electromagnetism is a more appropriate theory (f rom the ex- perimental point of view) than Weber’s electrodynamics. Bu t Maxwell’s physical laws are notinvariant under Galilean transformations; they are invariant under Lorentz transformations [13]. Besides, it has been shown (i) that Weber’s electrodynamical force gives the wrong dir ection for the radiation field generated by an accelerating charge and (ii) that it cannot explain the synchrotron light (widely confirmed by particle accelerators) since Weber’s force takes into account only radial accelera tions. For details see [6, 7]. Quoting Cavalleri et al. [6]: Concluding, Weber’s expression and allits generalizations are wrong without any hope of retrieval. 3. Hence, it is not possible to use Weber’s gravitation law an d Maxwell’s electrodynamics in the same mathematical framework, i.e., with the same transformation group. If one insists to use Weber’s electro dynamics, some well known and basic experimental data should be ignored. Be sides, a relational mechanics as suggested by Assis and Graneau, tog ether with a maxwellian eletrodynamics would send us back to the old dis cussions concerning an ether in space, in order to explain the propaga tion of elec- tromagnetic waves, by means of the mechanical theory of wave s [9]. One possible solution to this dilema (but we are not sure) is t o modify Weber’s electrodynamics in order to get a delayed action-at-a-dist ance theory inspired on the ideas presented by F. Hoyle and J. V. Narlikar in their fab ulous book [12]. Gravitation should also be modified into the scope of this pro posal. Yet, in [4] Assis and Graneau make a strange comparison betwe en actions- at-a-distance in classical theories and nonlocal phenomen a in quantum physics. They claim that ‘physics has moved imperceptibly away from fi eld-contact ac- tion’, due to the nonlocal phenomena in the microscopic worl d. This argument seems to be used in order to make more plausible the acceptanc e of actions-at- a-distance in classical physics. Some electrodynamical ex periments are cited, in 7order to support their ideas. For a very interesting discuss ion about some of these experiments see [6, 7]. We do not think that any relatio nship between clas- sical actions-at-a-distance and quantum nonlocal phenome na are so obviously perceptible. For example, nonlocal phenomena seem to be clo sely related to the problem of indistinguishability [16], which seems to deman d a new mathematical framework [14, 21]. That does not seem to be the case in classi cal physics. For a proposal of a classical picture of nonlocality see [23]. There is one final remark that we would like to do in this sectio n. It has to do with history. On March 19, 1845, C. F. Gauss wrote a letter t o W. Weber [12]: ... I would doubtless have published my researches long sinc e were it not that at the time I gave them up I had failed to find what I regarded as the keystone, Nil actum reputans si quid superesset agen- dum: namely, the derivation of the additional forces – to be adde d to the interaction of electrical charges at rest, when they a re both in motion – from an action which is propagated not instantane ously but in time as is the case with light... According to Hoyle and Narlikkar (op. cit.) both Weber and Ga uss were worry about a reformulation of action-at-a-distance. Neve rtheless, when Weber proposed in 1846 his electrodynamical force given by equati on (2) [3], he did not intend to solve this problem. He was interested on a gener al expression for interaction among electric charges such that Coulomb’s for ce and Amp` ere’s force were just particular cases up to appropriate approximation s. 5 McKinsey-Sugar-Suppes System for Classical Par- ticle Mechanics This section is essentially based on the axiomatization of c lassical particle me- chanics due to P. Suppes [22], which is a variant of the formul ation by J. C. C. McKinsey, A. C. Sugar and P. Suppes [18]. We call this McKin sey-Sugar- Suppes system of classical particle mechanics and abbrevia te this terminology as MSS system. MSS system will be useful in order to allow us a c ompari- son between newtonian mechanics (represented by MSS system ) and relational mechanics (represented by our Mach’s system). In other word s, our axiomatic system for Mach’s mechanics is achieved thanks to the techni que previously used by McKinsey, Sugar and Suppes. The reader should not understand that MSS system does faithf ully translate all the ideas behind newtonian mechanics; but it translates , in an intuitive man- ner, some of the main aspects of Newton’s ideas. An analogous comment may 8be done with respect to relational mechanics and our machian system of particle mechanics. MSS system has six primitive notions: P,T,m,s,f, andg.PandT are sets, mis a real-valued unary function defined on P,sandgare vector- valued functions defined on the Cartesian product P×T, andfis a vector- valued function defined on the Cartesian product P×P×T. Intuitivelly, P corresponds to the set of particles and Tis to be physically interpreted as a set of real numbers measuring elapsed times (in terms of some uni t of time, and measured from some origin of time). m(p) is to be interpreted as the numerical value of the mass of p∈P.sp(t), where t∈T, is a 3-dimensional vector which is to be physically interpreted as the position of particle pat instant t.f(p,q,t), where p,q∈P, corresponds to the internal force that particle qexerts over p, at instant t. And finally, the function g(p,t) is to be understood as the external force acting on particle pat instant t. Now, we can give the axioms for MSS system. Definition 1 P=/angbracketleftP,T,s,m,f,g/angbracketrightis a MSS system if and only if the following axioms are satisfied: P1Pis a non-empty, finite set. P2Tis an interval of real numbers. P3Ifp∈Pandt∈T, then sp(t)is a3-dimensional vector ( sp(t)∈ ℜ3) such thatd2sp(t) dt2exists. P4Ifp∈P, then m(p)is a positive real number. P5Ifp,q∈Pandt∈T, then f(p,q,t) =−f(q,p,t). P6Ifp,q∈Pandt∈T, then [sp(t),f(p,q,t)] =−[sq(t),f(q,p,t)]. P7Ifp,q∈Pandt∈T, then m(p)d2sp(t) dt2=/summationtext q∈Pf(p,q,t) +g(p,t). The brackets [,] in axiom P6denote external product. Axiom P5corresponds to a weak version of Newton’s Third Law: to every force there is always a counterforce. Axioms P6andP5, correspond to the strong version of Newton’s Third Law. Axiom P6establishes that the direction of force and counterforce is the direction of the line defined by the coordinates of particles pandq. Axiom P7corresponds to Newton’s Second Law. Definition 2 LetP=/angbracketleftP,T,s,m,f,g/angbracketrightbe a MSS system, let P′be a non-empty subset of P, lets′,g′, and m′be, respectively, the restrictions of functions s,g, 9andmwith their first arguments restricted to P′, and let f′be the restriction of fwith its first two arguments restricted to P′. Then P′=/angbracketleftP′,T,s′,m′,f′,g′/angbracketrightis a subsystem of Pif∀p,q∈P′and∀t∈T, m′(p)d2s′ p(t) dt2=/summationdisplay q∈P′f′(p,q,t) +g′(p,t). (9) Theorem 1 Every subsystem of a MSS system is again a MSS system.1 Definition 3 Two MSS systems P=/angbracketleftP,T,s,m,f,g/angbracketright and P′=/angbracketleftP′,T′,s′,m′,f′,g′/angbracketright are equivalent if and only if P=P′,T=T′,s=s′, and m=m′. Definition 4 A MSS system is isolated if and only if for every p∈Pandt∈T, g(p,t) =/angbracketleft0,0,0/angbracketright. Theorem 2 If P=/angbracketleftP,T,s,m,f,g/angbracketright and P′=/angbracketleftP′,T′,s′,m′,f′,g′/angbracketright are two equivalent systems of particle mechanics, then for e veryp∈Pandt∈T /summationdisplay q∈Pf(p,q,t) +g(p,t) =/summationdisplay q∈P′f′(p,q,t) +g′(p,t). The embedding theorem is the following: Theorem 3 Every MSS system is equivalent to a subsystem of an isolated s ys- tem of particle mechanics. The next theorem can easily be proved by Padoa’s method: 1In the original MSS system it is presented another definition for subsystem, where this theorem is not valid. 10Theorem 4 Mass and internal force are each independent of the remainin g primitive notions of MSS system. According to Suppes [22]: Some authors have proposed that we convert the second law [of New- ton], that is, P7, into a definition of the total force acting on a par- ticle. [...] It prohibits within the axiomatic framework an y analysis of the internal and external forces acting on a particle. Tha t is, if all notions of force are eliminated as primitive and P7is used as a definition, then the notions of internal and external force are not definable within the given axiomatic framework. 6 Set-theoretical Predicate for Mach’s Mechanics As in the previous section, our system has six primitive noti ons:P,T,m,s,f, andg.PandTare sets, mis a real-valued unary function defined on P,sand gare vector-valued functions defined on the Cartesian produc tP×T, andfis a vector-valued function defined on the Cartesian product P×P×T. Intuitivelly, Pcorresponds to the set of particles and Tis to be physically interpreted as a set of real numbers measuring elapsed times (in terms of some unit of time, and measured from some origin of time). m(p) is to be interpreted as the numerical value of the mass of p∈P.sp(t), where t∈T, is a 3-dimensional vector which is to be physically interpreted as the position of particle pat instant t.f(p,q,t), where p,q∈P, corresponds to the internal force that particle qexerts over p, at instant t. And finally, the function g(p,t) is to be understood as the external force acting on particle pat instant t. Definition 5 M=/angbracketleftP,T,s,m,f,g/angbracketrightis amachian system of particles if and only if the following axioms are satisfied: M1Pis a non-empty, finite set. M2Tis an interval of real numbers. M3Ifp∈Pandt∈T, then sp(t)is a3-dimensional vector ( sp(t)∈ ℜ3) such thatd2sp(t) dt2exists. M4Ifp∈P, then m(p)is a positive real number. M5Ifp,q∈Pandt∈T, then f(p,q,t) =−f(q,p,t). M6Ifp,q∈Pandt∈T, then [sp(t),f(p,q,t)] =−[sq(t),f(q,p,t)]. 11M7Ifp,q∈Pandt∈T, then /summationdisplay q∈Pf(p,q,t) +g(p,t) =0. M8Ifp∈Pandt∈T, then g(p,t) =−m(p)d2sp(t) dt2. The brackets [,] in axiom M6denote external product, like in the previous section. Axioms M1-M6are in agreement with MSS system. Axioms M5-M6are in correspondence with the first ‘postulate’ of relational m echanics. Axiom M7 corresponds to the second ‘postulate’ of relational mechan ics and is one of the most important aspects of the proposal presented in [4]. Not withstanding, axiom M8is a new ingredient, since it is a differential equation which says that the external force g(p,t) determines the dynamics of particle p. We advocate the idea that this axiom incorporates Mach’s principle of inert ia if, and only if, we interpret g(p,t) as an interaction of pwith other ‘material bodies’, whatever is that supposed to mean. In our language there is no necessity t o give a detailed description of the nature of this external force. A more deta iled and intuitive meaning of g(p,t) may be done by means of the models of M. We discuss this point in the next section. Anyway, axiom M8seems to be not in agreement with the relational mechanics proposed by Assis in [5]. But that d oes not represent any problem for us, since we are interested on Mach’s princip le as presented in the Introduction. Ifpis the only particle in P, then according to axioms M7andM8we have the following differential equation: d2sp(t) dt2=0, (10) which corresponds to an ‘inertial’ particle. On the other hand, if there is more than one particle pinP, then: /summationdisplay q∈Pf(p,q,t) =m(p)d2sp(t) dt2(11) which corresponds to Newton’s second law. In other words, inspired on Mach’s ideas about inertia, we pr oved the exis- tence of inertia in a particle mechanics theory, without any reference to Weber’s law of gravitation. As a matter of fact, equation (11) is cons istent with either a newtonian gravitational law, or a Weber gravitation or any other gravitation law which obeys the action-reaction principle given by axio msM5andM6. Assis and Graneau [4] say that “gravitational mass is the mas s which appears in Newton’s law of universal gravitation, in the weight of a b ody, and in the 12gravitational potential energy”. If we specify the kind of i nternal forces fin our system, such forces may (or not) depend on the mass mof particles. Nevertheless, there is no distinction at all between inertial or gravitati onal mass in our system. We have just mass. 7 Gravitation in Mach’s System In this section we show that our system is consistent with Ass is-Graneau proposal with a Weber like law of gravitation as well as with Newton’s l aw of gravitation. First we discuss the interpretation of our axiomatic system into the context of Weber’s law of gravitation. The question is: how to interpret the primitive concepts in a machian system of particles? We show below that Assis-Graneu cosmology may be considered as a possible interpretation of our system. The interpretatio n ofP,T, and mare obvious. The problem regards the interpretation of f,g, ands. According to equations (6) and (8) and the second ‘postulate ’ of relational mechanics, we have: N/summationdisplay j=1Fmj−m/parenleftbigg ¨rmS+ωUS×(ωUS×rmS) + 2˙rmS×ωUS+rmS×dωUS dt/parenrightbigg =0, (12) for the case where the whole universe does have a rotation ωUSwith respect to an arbitrary system of coordinates. According to axioms M7andM8, it seems clear, at least from the logico- mathematical standpoint, that we can interpret the vectors f,g, andsas it follows: f(p,q,t) =Fmj, (13) where mis the mass of particle pandjis the particle qitself. g(p,t) =−ma, (14) where ais an acceleration given by: a=¨rmS+ωUS×(ωUS×rmS) + 2˙rmS×ωUS+rmS×dωUS dt.(15) The vector sis the solution of the differential equation: d2sp(t) dt2=a. (16) 13It is important to remark that this last equation (which is co nsistent with Eq. (12), gives us a relationship between rands, which obviously are not the same (r/negationslash=s). From the logico-mathematical point of view this is sound, since we are using Assis-Graneau theory as a model for our axiomatic fram ework. Eq. (12) is derived from Weber’s law of gravitation and the relational m echanics postulates. We interpret the position vector sof our system as the solution of the differential equation (16). This ends our interpretation into the contex t of Weber’s law of gravitation. Next, we interpret our axiomatic system into the scope of New ton’s law of gravitation. The interpretation of newtonian force of gravitation is qui te natural. We interpret P,T,s,m, andgin the standard manner, i.e., set of particles, time interval, position vector, rest mass, and external force, r espectively. It should be clear to the reader that these are the standard interpreta tions of P,T,s,m, andgin MSS system, which is a formulation for newtonian classica l mechanics. Vector fis interpreted as: f(p,q,t) =−γm(p)m(q)sp(t)−sq(t) |sp(t)−sq(t)|3. (17) which gives, according to axioms M7andM8, the dynamics of a particle under the influence of the gravitational force given above. 8 Final Remarks We do not claim that our axiomatic framework for machian mech anics does solve the problems of symmetry pointed out in section 4. It could no t be the case, since our axiomatic framework does not make any reference to transformation groups. One manner to deal with this problem is by means of tra nsformation groups that allow us to establish a relationship among differ ent models for our axiomatic framework. The main purposes of our version for ma chian mechanics are: (i) to show that Mach’s principle may be implemented in m echanics without any reference to a Weber’s law of gravitation; and (ii) to pro ve Newton’s second law as a theorem with the help of proper axioms. A more satisfactory mathematical framework for relational mechanics would be a gauge-theoretical picture by means of fiber bundles. Tha t would be a manner to classify all transformation groups that are consi stent with a machian principle for mechanics. That would be an extension of the pr ogram presented in [1]. 149 Acknowledgments We acknowledge with thanks the suggestions by Newton C. A. da Costa, Andr´ e K. T. Assis, Giancarlo Cavalleri, and E. Tonni into the conte xt of e-mail mes- sages that we exchanged with them concerning relational mec hanics, classical electrodynamics, and the problem of inertia as well as the ax iomatic method in physics. References [1] Arnold, V. I., Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer- Verlag, New York, 1989). [2] Assis, A. K. T., ‘On Mach’s principle’ Found. Phys. Lett. 2301-318 (1989). [3] Assis, A. K. T., Weber’s Electrodynamics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994). [4] Assis, A. K. T. and P. Graneau, ‘Nonlocal forces of inerti a in cosmology’ Found. Phys. 26271-283 (1996). [5] Assis, A. K. T., Relational Mechanics (Apeiron, Montreal, 1999). [6] Cavalleri, G., E. Tonni, and G. Spavieri, ‘On the rigorou s force law between current elements and some of its consequences’, Hadronic J. 21459-478 (1998). [7] Cavalleri, G, G. Bettoni, G. Spavieri, and E. Tonni, ‘Exp erimental proof of standard electrodynamics by measuring the self-force on a p art of a current loop’, Phys. Rev. E 582505-2517 (1998). [8] Dugas, R., A History of Mechanics (Dover, New York, 1955). [9] Einstein, A., ‘On the ether’, in The Philosophy of Vacuum edited by S. Saun- ders and H. R. Brown, 13-20, (Clarendom Press, Oxford, 1991) . Translated by S. W. Saunders and originally published as ‘ ¨Uber den ¨Ather’, Schweiz- erische naturforschende Gesellschaft, Verhanflungen 10585-93 (1924). [10] Hertz, H. R., Die Prinzipien der Mechanik in Neuem Zusammenhange Dargestellt (Barth, Leipzig, 1894). [11] Hertz, H. R., The Principles of Mechanics , (Dover, New York, 1956). [12] Hoyle, F. and Narlikar, J. V., Lectures on Cosmology and Action at a Dis- tance Electrodynamics (World Scientific, London, 1996). 15[13] Jackson, J. D., Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975). [14] Krause, D., A. S. Sant’Anna, and A. G. Volkov, ‘Quasi-se t theory for bosons and fermions: quantum distributions’, Found. Phys. Lett. ,1251-66 (1999). [15] Mach, E., The Science of Mechanics , (The Open Court Publishing Co., 1974). [16] Mandel, L., ‘Coherence and indistinguishability’, Optics Letters 161882- 1884 (1991). [17] Mendelson, E., Introduction to Mathematical Logic (Chapman & Hall, Lon- don, 1997). [18] McKinsey, J. C. C., A. C. Sugar and P. Suppes, ‘Axiomatic foundations of classical particle mechanics’, J. Rational Mechanics and Analysis ,2253-272 (1953). [19] Sant’Anna, A. S., ‘An axiomatic framework for classica l particle mechanics without force’, Philos. Natur. 33187-203 (1996). [20] Sant’Anna, A. S., ‘An axiomatic framework for classica l particle mechanics without space-time’, Philos. Natur. 36307-319 (1999). [21] Sant’Anna, A. S. and A. M. S. Santos, ‘Quasi-set-theore tical foundations of statistical mechanics: a research program’, Found. Phys. ,30101-120 (2000). [22] Suppes, P., Introduction to Logic , (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1957). [23] Suppes, P., J. A. de Barros, and A. S. Sant’Anna, ‘Violat ion of Bell’s in- equalities with a local theory of photons’, Found. Phys. Lett. 9551-560 (1996). 16

Nakhmanson 1Bell’s theorem, entanglement, and common sense Raoul Nakhmanson Nakhmanson@t-online.de A simple analogy to understand the quantum-mechanical entanglement within local-realistic world is presented. The majority of professional physicists working in the “main stream” declare that quantum physics is a very strange domain which is not like anything we find in commonlife, and that it is unimaginable for our consciousness. They broadcast such a statementin professional and popular literature that inspire frustration and feeling of inferiority oftheir readers. Up to now used analogies with Carroll’s personages are directed to showthat these analogies don’t work in accordance with common sense. The recent exampledevoted to entanglement was in [1]. Of course it would be better to find such an analogy which works. Then it can be used for education and popularization, and perhaps for physics itself. Let’s have a brief look at the history of the “main stream” meaning. The key words are quantum mechanics (QM), reality, uncertainty, nonlocality, entanglement, interaction-free measurement . They are interpreted as follows: QM is a theory having its mathematical formalism which allows to describe the results of observations and experiments performed on separate microobjects (molecules,atoms, elementary particles, ...) and their ensembles. Some predictions of QM (eigenwerts, parameters) are very precise, others (results of interactions allowingalternative outcomes) are only probabilistic. Reality is a physical world which stays behind the QM-formalism. The question on its immanent existence is declared by “main stream” as non-scientific. “No elementaryphenomenon is a phenomenon until it is a registered (observed) phenomenon”[2], i.e.we have to think only about so-called “observables”. Uncertainty is principal impossibility of QM to forecast a result of an interaction e.g. a measurement having several possible outcomes. Only possibilities of correspondingoutcomes can be calculated. This term is used also if two “non-commutableobservables” (e.g. co-ordinate and impulse) want to be measured simultaneously. Suchan uncertainty is a very special attribute of QM as compared with the determinism of classical physics. Nonlocality is a possibility of an instant interaction between far parted objects. Entanglement is such a correlation between once interacting and later departed particles which exceeds the possibility of local-realistic model with hidden parameters.The wave function of an entangled state can not be written as a product of individualwave functions. Interaction-free measurement is a possibility to have some information about an object (its existence in some region of space, its form, ...) without any direct interactionbetween the object and a measurement apparatus.Nakhmanson 2The base of “main stream” philosophy was founded by Bohr. Planck, Einstein, de Broglie, Schrödinger, and others criticize the agnosticism of the “Copenhagen”interpretation of QM. Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen [3] tried to show theincompleteness of QM using the example with two particles (EPRGedankenexperiment). De Broglie, Schrödinger and others tried to develop realisticmodels of quantum phenomena. An important work here was made by Bohmpresenting in 1952 a consequent hidden-parameter model [4]. However the essential parameter of Bohm’s model - quantum potential - was nonlocal for entangled states. Is nonlocality in any hidden-parameter model? In 1964Bell apparently found an experimental possibility to prove it [5]. He showed that inEPR’s situation the QM predicts a behavior correlation between far parted particleswhich are stronger than a correlation predicted by an arbitrary local-realistic model withhidden parameters. The following experiments [6,7] confirm the QM prediction. As itseems, trying to interpret the experiments one has a dilemma: either to reject any realityexcept “observables” like Bohr or to accept nonlocality like Bohm. Both alternativesare of course non-compatible with common sense. So, must we follow the “main stream” and reject common sense? Must we use analogies and models which don’t work in accordance with common sense? Theanswer is not, at least not yet , not all , and not for education . Let us start with an analogy of the EPR-experiment. Supposing there are twins, Ralf and Rolf, living in Frankfurt and working for Lufthansa as pilots. For their employer(but not for their families!) they are “indistinguishable particles”. The twins always tryto dress alike, they believe that this brings them happiness. Because they are often indifferent countries, they agree on an order of sartorial priority: cold before warmth andrain before dry spell. Fig. 1. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) experiment and the apparent non-local interaction of entangled particles.Ralf RolfNakhmanson 3Once Ralf flies to England and Rolf flies to Greece (Fig.1). God who is observing the twins, sees that they carry clothes and shoes having the same sizes. He is notsurprised: Ralf and Rolf are twins and have the same mechanical (hidden) parameters.God sees also that their sets of clothes and shoes are identical in fashion and color andvery simple: each of them has only one variant for warm weather and one variant forcold weather. He does not wonder: such parameters can be stipulated in Frankfurt. Besides that God sees a very striking correlation: the twins dress alike independent of the weather! It is natural if the weather in England and in Greece is the same. But whyit is so when the weather is not the same? Why if it is cold in England, not only Ralfbut also Rolf wears an overcoat in spite of the warm weather and if it is raining inGreece, not only Rolf but also Ralf hides beneath an umbrella, regardless of the sun inEngland (Fig.1)? “What is the matter?” - thinks God, - “I control experimentalconditions, namely, today’s weather in England and in Greece, and I know the twins’financial status, telephoning is too expensive for them. So it seems there is a non-localinteraction ( entanglement ) between the twins. I am sure it is a new escapade of the devil!” God’s conclusion was only half true. In his heavenly chariot he fell behind the technical progress of the 20th century. He was right suspecting the devil. But up tonow the devil does not realize non-local interaction. Instead, he had endowed humanswith the ability to forecast future and also had invented radio, television, power computer for meteorology, and communication satellites for support. Therefore thetwins using their own experience and radio or TV reports every evening can forecast the weather for tomorrow in England and Greece and dress in accordance with theiragreement. The difference between the twins’ situation and the EPR-Bohm-Bell’s analyse is the ability of living “particles” to forecast future. The living objects have a non-mechanicalhidden parameter, namely, a consciousness !. The proof of Bell’s theorem is based on the next assertion: if P a is a probability of result a measured on the particle 1 in the point A having a condition (e.g. angle of analyzer) α , and P b is a probability of result b measured on the particle 2 in the distant point B having a condition β , then β has no influence on the P a , and vice versa. Herein Bell and others saw the indispensable requirement of local realism and “separability”. Mathematically it can be written as Pab(λ1i,λ2i,α,β) = P a(λ1i,α)×Pb(λ2i,β) (Bell) , (1) where P ab is the probability of the join result ab , and λ1i and λ2i are hidden parameters of particles 1 and 2 in an arbitrary local-realistic theory. Under the influence of Bell’s theorem and the experiments following it and showing, that forentangled particles the condition (1) is no longer valid, some “realists” reject locality.In this case an instantaneous action at a distance is possible, and one can write Pab(λ1i,λ2i,α,β) = P a(λ1i,α,β)×Pb(λ2i,β,α) (non-locality) . (2)Nakhmanson 4In principle such a relation permits a description of any correlation between a and b, particularly predicted by QM and observed in experiments. But for living particles in the frame of local realism the condition (1) is not indispensable. Instead, one can write Pab(λ1i,λ2i,α,β) = P a(λ1i,α,β´)×Pb(λ2i,β,α´) (forecast) , (3) where α´ and β´ are the conditions of measurements in points A and B , respectively, as they can be forecast by particles at the moment of their parting. If the forecast is good enough, i.e., α´ ≈ α and β´ ≈ β , then (3) practically coincides with (2) and has all its advantages plus locality. Persisting in “main stream” one can successfully use the analogy of the twins in an education process and conclude e.g. with “If a baby, having more experience with itsparents than with “inanimate” matter, could make experiments, the behavior ofmicroparticles would appear to it to be very natural”. Is the above analogy more than an analogy? Can “inanimate” matter really own some “consciousness” and forecast the future? Some philosophers and physicists supposed it[8]. There is a development of this idea to the level of a consequent hypothesis whichcan be tested experimentally [9-11]. For example, in EPR-type experiments one canquickly change an analyzer direction. Periodical switching [7] must be avoided becauseit is predictable, random switching is preferable [9-12]. The corresponding randomgenerator must be “good” enough to exclude forecasting by the particles, but this issueis not trivial. For example Weihs et al. [12] wrote: “Selection of an analyzer direction has to be completely unpredictable, which necessitates a physical random number generator. A pseudo-random-number generatorcannot be used, since its state at any time is predetermined” (p. 5039). As a “physicalrandom number generator” the authors used a “light-emitting diode illuminating a beamsplitter whose outputs are monitored by photomultipliers” (p. 5041). Such a point of view must be commented. It is a right prerequisite that the generator must be unpredictable for particles, but referring to above “physical” generator it is notclear: If particles have “consciousness” such a generator can also be a “pseudo” one.Perhaps a good “human” pseudo-random generator is preferable because it belongs toanother civilization. References [1] P. G. Kwiat and L. Hardy, “The mystery of the quantum cakes,” Am. J. Phys. 68, 33-36 (2000). [2] J. A. Wheeler, “Law without law,” in Quantum Theory and Experiment , ed. by J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1983) p. 192. [3] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780 (1935). [4] D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables,” Phys. Rev. 85, 166-179 (1952).Nakhmanson 5[5] J.S.Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physics 1, 195-200 (1964). [6] S. J. Freedmann and J. F. Clauser, “Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938-941 (1972). [7] A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time- varying analyzers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804-1807 (1982). [8] Anaxagoras, Aristoteles, Leibniz, ... See Refs. [9-11] and the literature cited there.[9] R. Nakhmanson, “Informational experiments with microparticles and atoms,” in Waves and Particles in Light and Matter , ed. by A. van der Merwe and A. Garuccio (Plenum Press, New York, 1994), pp. 571-582. [10] R. Nakhmanson, “The ghostly solution of the quantum paradoxes and its experimental verification,” in Frontiers of Fundamental Physics , ed. by M. Barone and F. Selleri (Plenum Press, New York, 1994), pp. 591-596. [11] R. Nakhmanson, “Informational interpretation of quantum mechanics,” LANL arXiv, http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/physics/0004047 . [12] G. Weihs et al., “Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039-5043 (1998).

arXiv:physics/0005043v1 [physics.bio-ph] 16 May 2000Universality and individuality in a neural code Elad Schneidman,1,2Naama Brenner,3Naftali Tishby,1,3 Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck,3and William Bialek3 1Institute for Computer Science, Center for Neural Computation and 2Department of Neurobiology Hebrew University Jerusalem 91904, Israel 3NEC Research Institute 4 Independence Way Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA elads/tishby@cs.huji.ac.il brenner/ruyter/bialek@research.nj.nec.com The problem of neural coding is to understand how sequences o f action po- tentials (spikes) are related to sensory stimuli, motor out puts, or (ultimately) thoughts and intentions. One clear question is whether the s ame coding rules are used by different neurons, or by corresponding neurons in different individ- uals. We present a quantitative formulation of this problem using ideas from information theory, and apply this approach to the analysis of experiments in the fly visual system. We find significant individual differenc es in the structure of the code, particularly in the way that temporal patterns o f spikes are used to convey information beyond that available from variations i n spike rate. On the other hand, all the flies in our ensemble exhibit a high coding efficiency, so that every spike carries the same amount of information in all the individuals. Thus the neural code has a quantifiable mixture of individuality a nd universality. 1Introduction When two people look at the same scene, do they see the same thi ngs? This basic question in the theory of knowledge seems to be bey ond the scope of experimental investigation. An accessible version of th is question is whether different observers of the same sense data have the same neura l representation of these data: how much of the neural code is universal, and ho w much is individual? To approach this problem we must give a quantita tive definition of similarity or distance among neural codes. The problem of comparing neural codes has some analogies to t he problem of comparing among amino acid sequences in proteins. In the n eural code, sequences of action potentials stand for sensory inputs or m otor outputs; in the genetic code sequences of nucleotides stand for amino acids which in turn encode the three dimensional structure of proteins. Just as motifs of several amino acids collectively can encode structural elements in prote ins, patterns of several action potentials across time or across a population of cell s can have a special meaning. For proteins, sequences can be similar because the y have a recent common ancestor; alternatively, sequences can be equivale nt functionally even if they are distinguishable, since convergent evolution ha s led to very different sequences that encode proteins with similar structures and functions. For the neural code we show that these notions of distinguishabilit y and functional equivalence can be quantified using ideas from information t heory [1, 2]. In particular this approach does not require a metric either on the space of stimuli or on the space of neural responses; all notions of similarit y emerge from the statistical structure of the neural responses. We apply these methods to analyze experiments on an identifie d motion sensitive neuron in the fly’s visual system, the cell H1 [3]. M any invertebrate nervous systems have cells that can be named and numbered [4] , and in many cases the total number of neurons involved in representing a portion of the sensory world is quite small, so that destruction of individ ual neurons can have a substantial impact on behavior (see, for example, Ref. [5] ). In these cases the neural representation of sensory information is especiall y accessible, precisely because it is localized to a small set of identified cells. On t he other hand, if a large fraction of neurons is identifiable it might seem that the question of whether different individuals share the same neural represe ntation of the visual world would have a trivial answer. Far from trivial, we shall see that the neural code even for id entified neurons in flies has components which are common among flies and signifi cant compo- nents which are individual to each fly. The existence of ident ified neurons thus does not preclude the expression of individuality in neural representations; we should expect that all neural circuits, both vertebrate and invertebrate, express a degree of universality and a degree of individuality. For H 1 we quantify these ideas, and we hope that the methods we introduce will be appli cable more gen- erally. In the interest of making the discussion more access ible we have confined mathematical arguments to the Methods section; in the main t ext we make use of analogies to provide some intuition for what the infor mation theoretic 2quantities are measuring. Distinguishing among flies We place our discussion in the context of the experiments sho wn in Fig. 1. Nine different flies are shown precisely the same movie, whi ch is repeated many times for each fly; as we show the movie we record the actio n potentials from the H1 neuron. The details of the stimulus movie should n ot have a qualitative impact on the results, provided that the movie t hat is sufficiently long and rich to drive the system through a reasonable and nat ural range of responses. Figure 1b makes clear that qualitative features of the neural response on long time scales ( ∼100 ms) are common to almost all the flies, and that some aspects of the response are reproducible on a (few) millisec ond time scale across multiple presentations of the movie to each fly. Nonetheless the responses are not identical in the different flies, nor are they perfectly re produced from trial to trial in the same fly. The most obvious difference among the fl ies is in the average spike rate, which varies from 22 to 63 spikes/s among our ensemble of flies. But beyond that, how should we quantify the similari ty or difference among the neural responses? One way is to imagine that each spike train is a point in an abst ract space, and that there is a metric on this space. Considerable effort h as gone into the definition of metrics that are plausible biologically an d tractable computa- tionally [6, 7], and these methods have been used widely (for applications in neurobiology (see [7, 8, 9]), but all approaches based on met ric spaces have sev- eral problems. First, the metric is imposed by the investiga tor and does not emerge from the data. Second, even within a plausible class o f metrics there are arbitrary parameters, such as the relative distance cost of moving vs. deleting a spike. Finally, it is not clear that our intuitive notion of s imilarity among neural responses (or amino acid sequences) is captured by the mathe matical concept of a metric. In contrast, information theory [1] provides a method for qu antifying di- rectly the differences among the sources of the spike trains. Imagine that we record multiple speakers reading from the same text, in the s ame way that we record the activity of neurons from different flies respondin g to the same sensory inputs. There are many possible speakers, and we are shown a s mall sample of the speech signal: how well can we identify the speaker? If we can collect enough data to characterize the distribution of speech soun ds made by each speaker then we can quantify, in bits, the average amount of i nformation that a segment of speech gives about the identity of the speaker. F urther we can decompose this information into components carried by diffe rent features of the sounds. Following this analogy, we will measure the informa tion that a segment of the neural response provides about the identity of the fly, and we will ask how this individuality is distributed across different feat ures of the spike train. Apparently large differences in spike rate are surprisingly uninformative, but the temporal patterns of spikes allow for much more efficient disc rimination among 3individuals. The largest differences among individuals are in the way that these patterns are associated with specific stimulus features. We discretize the neural response into time bins of size ∆ t= 2 ms, which is also the time required to draw one frame of the stimulus mov ie. At this resolution there are almost never two spikes in a single bin, so we can think of the neural response as a binary string, as in Fig. 1c-d. We exa mine the response in blocks or windows of time having length T, so that an individual neural response becomes a binary ‘word’ WwithT/∆t’letters’. Clearly, any fixed choice of Tand ∆ tis arbitrary, and so we explore a range of these parameters. The distribution of words used by a particular fly’s H1 in resp onse to the stimulus movie, Pi(W) for the ithfly, tells us about the ‘vocabulary’ of that cell. Figure 1f shows that different flies ‘speak’ with similar but d istinct vocabularies. From these distributions Pi(W) we can quantify the average information that a single word of length Tgives about the identity of the fly, I(W→identity; T) [see Eq. (1) in Methods]. Thus, we measure how well we can disc riminate be- tween one individual and a mixture of all the other individua ls in the ensemble, or effectively how ‘far’ each individual is from the mean of he r conspecifics. The finite size of our data set prevents us from exploring arbi trarily long words, but happily we find that information about identity is accumulating at more or less constant rate Rwell before the undersampling limits of the exper- iment are reached (Fig. 2a). Thus I(W→identity; T)≈R(W→identity) ·T; R(W→identity) ≈5 bits/s, with a very weak dependence on the time resolu- tion ∆ t. Since the mean spike rate can be measured by counting the num ber of 1s in each word W, this information includes the differences in firing rate among the different flies. Even if flies use very similar ‘vocabularies,’ they may differ substantially in the way that they associate words with particular stimulus f eatures. In our experiments the stimulus runs continuously in a loop, so tha t we can specify the stimulus precisely by giving the time relative to the sta rt of the loop; in this way we don’t need to make any assumptions about which fea tures of the stimulus are important for the neuron, nor do we need a metric in the space of stimuli. We can therefore consider the word Wthat the ithfly will generate at timet. This word is drawn from the distribution Pi(W|t) which we can sample, as in Fig. 1c–e, by looking across multiple presentations of the same stimulus movie. In parallel with the discussion above, we can now ask f or the average information that a word Wprovides about identity given that it was observed at a particular time t. This depends on the time tbecause some moments in the stimulus are more informative than others, as is obvious fro m Fig. 1. The more natural quantity is an average over all times t, which is the average information that we can gain about the identity of the fly by observing a wor dWat a known timetrelative to the stimulus, I({W, t} →identity; T) [see Eq. (5) in Methods]. Figure 2b shows a plot of I({W, t} →identity; T)/Tas a function of the observation time window of size T. Observing both the spike train and the stimulus together provides 32 ±1 bits /s about the identity of the fly. This is more than six times as much information as we can gain by obser ving the spike train alone, and corresponds to gaining one bit in ∼30 ms. Correspondingly, 4a typical pair of flies in our ensemble can be distinguished re liably in ∼30 ms. This is the time scale on which flies actually use their estima tes of visual motion to guide their flight during chasing behavior [10], so that th e neural codes of different individuals are distinguishable on the time scale s relevant to behavior. Spike rates and information rates Having seen that we can distinguish reliably among individu al flies using relatively short samples of the neural response, it is natur al to ask about the ori- gins and implications of these individual differences. Perh aps the most obvious question is whether the substantial differences in the code a mong the different neurons have an impact on the ability of these cells to convey information about the visual stimulus. As discussed in Refs. [11, 12], the rate at which the neural response provides information about the visual stimulus, Ri(W→s(t);T), is determined by the same probability distributions Pi(W|t) as before [see Eq’s. (6–9) in Methods]. Again we note that our estimate of the info rmation rate itself is independent of any metric in the space of stimuli, n or does it depend on assumptions about which stimulus features are most impor tant in the code. Figure 3a shows that the flies in our ensemble span a range of in forma- tion rates from Ri(W→s(t))≈50 to ≈150 bits /s. This threefold range of information rates is correlated with the range of spike rate s, so that each of the cells transmits nearly a constant amount of information per spike, 2 .39± 0.24 bits /spike. The error bar in this case ( ±0.24 bits /spike) is a standard devi- ation across the ensemble of flies, not a standard error of the mean: the number of bits per spike transmitted by H1 (under these stimulus con ditions) is constant from fly to fly within 10%, despite three fold variations in tot al spike rate. Although information rates are correlated with spike rates , this does not mean that information is carried by a “rate code” alone. Rate coding usually is distinguished from “timing codes” in which the detailed t emporal structure of the spike train plays a crucial role. In particular, our co mputation of the information carried by the spike train includes automatica lly any contribution from temporal patterns, but to demonstrate that these patte rns are important we must show that this information is more than we expect just by summing the contributions of the individual spikes that make up the p atterns. This ‘single spike information’ can also be thought of as the info rmation conveyed by temporal modulations in the spike rate; see Ref. [14] and Eq. (11) in Methods. For all the flies in our ensemble, the total rate at which the sp ike train carries information is substantially larger than the ‘single spike ’ information—2 .39 vs. 1.64 bits/spike, on average. This extra information, as define d in Eq. (12) and illustrated in Fig. 3b, is carried in the temporal patterns o f spikes. The fact that the information per spike is constant across th e ensemble of flies means that cells with higher spike rates are not generat ing extra spikes at random, but rather each extra spike is equally informativ e about the visual stimulus. The capacity of the code to carry information is quantified by the entropy rate Si totalof the distribution of neural responses [see Eq’s. (6,10) in Methods], and is different in different flies. It is natural [13 , 15] to define the 5efficiency of the code as the fraction of this capacity which is used to convey information about the visual stimulus, ǫi=Ri(W→s(t))/Si total. Like the information per spike, this efficiency is nearly constant acr oss the ensemble of flies,ǫ= 0.59±0.05, at ∆ t= 2 ms, with a very weak dependence on ∆ t[12]. A universal codebook? Even though flies differ in the structures of their neural resp onses, distin- guishable responses could be functionally equivalent, as w ith distinct amino acid sequences that fold to the same protein structure. It might t herefore be that all flies could be endowed (genetically?) with a universal or con sensus codebook that allows each individual to make sense of her own spike tra ins, despite the differences from her conspecifics. Thus we want to ask how much information we lose if the identity of the flies is hidden from us, or equiva lently how much each fly can gain by knowing its own individual code. The codebook for any individual fly can be thought of as a proba bilistic mapping from neural responses or words back into the space of visual stimuli [16]. The information conveyed by the spike train quantifies the specificity of this mapping: the ‘tighter’ the distribution of stimuli con sistent with a given response the more information is conveyed. If the neural cod es used by different flies are different, then these conditional distributions in stimulus space are also different. If we don’t know the identity of the fly, all we c an do is to associate each neural response with a distribution of stimu li that corresponds to an average over the individuals, and this distribution ne cessarily is broader than any of the individual distributions. As a result, we hav e less information about the visual stimulus, as summarized by Eq. (14) in the Me thods. Intuitively, the greater the differences among the neural re sponses of different flies, the more visual information we will lose if we don’t kno w the identity of the individual. On the other hand, these differences mean that th e neural response provides information about individual identity, so that in formation gained about identity is information lost about the stimulus if we use a un iversal codebook. This intuitive connection is made precise by Eq. (15) in the M ethods. As a practical matter, this means that the answer to our question about the efficacy of a universal decoder is contained in the results of Fig. 2. T he result is that, on average, not knowing the identity of the fly limits us to ext racting only 64 bits/s of information about the visual stimulus. This shoul d be compared with the average information rate of 92 .3 bits/s in our ensemble of flies: knowing her own identity allows the average fly to extract 44% more inform ation from H1. Further analysis shows that each individual fly gains approx imately the same relative amount of information from knowing its personal co debook. 6The nature of the ‘personal’ bits Thus far we have analyzed the differences among the neural cod es of dif- ferent flies, and how much extra information a fly can extract b y knowing it’s individual codebook. It is natural to ask what is being “said ” by these extra bits, characterizing more explicitly the mapping from neur al responses back to stimulus space for the different flies. For each neural response Wwe can look back through the entire experiment and accumulate the motion trajectories that lead up to the re sponse, and these provide samples from the distribution of stimuli condition al on the response as described above. Because the space of trajectories has many dimensions, this distribution is difficult to visualize, and so we focus here on the means of these distributions. This is a generalization of the reverse corr elation or spike triggered average method [13]: rather than looking at the average stim ulus that leads to a single spike, we look at the average stimulus that leads to t he responses W, which can consist of a pattern of spikes and empty intervals [ 16]. In Fig. 4 we show the average waveforms of the stimulus veloci ty preced- ing a specific binary word in the spike trains of flies 1 and 6. As fly 6 spike trains convey almost 3 times more information about the stim ulus, one might have speculated that the same word was used in completely diff erent stimulus contexts for the two flies. In fact, the differences are in the d etails and not in the general picture: spikes stand for pulses of positive vel ocity (as in Fig. 4b), long silent intervals stand for negative velocities (as in F igs. 4a&c), and the largest differences among the flies are in the widths, latenci es and amplitudes of the pulses; combinations of spikes and intervals then lea d to very different trajectories (as in Fig. 4d). For the fly which conveys less in formation, spikes are associated with larger positive velocities (Fig. 4b) an d silences are associ- ated with (slightly) larger negative velocities (Fig. 4a); thus, these elementary responses come closer to exhausting the dynamic range of the inputs. Con- versely, the more informative spike train covers the dynami c range of inputs with a greater variety of composite responses. Discussion One obvious difference between invertebrate and vertebrate nervous systems is the existence of identified neurons in invertebrates. The identifiability of in- vertebrate neurons sometimes has been interpreted to mean t hat these smaller nervous systems are hard wired automata; indeed the optomot or system of flies has been held up as a clear example of this extreme view. In thi s view, indi- viduality plays no role, and it should even be possible to ave rage the results of experiments on corresponding neurons in different indivi duals. For verte- brates, substantial individuality arises through develop ment and learning, and there are few if any identified neurons; at best vertebrates h ave identifiable modules consisting of hundreds or thousands of neurons, suc h as the columns in visual cortex. Against this clear dichotomy it is worth re membering that 7even genetically identical single celled organisms exhibi t individuality in their sensory–motor behavior [17]. In the present work we have tried to the quantify the individu ality of the neural code used by a single neuron in the fly visual system. On the one hand, this individuality is sufficient to allow discrimination amo ng individuals on time scales of relevance to behavior. Correspondingly, each ind ividual fly would lose a significant amount ( ∼30%) of the visual information carried by this neuron if it ‘knew’ only the codebook appropriate to the whole ensem ble of flies. On the other hand, these differences among the codebooks of diffe rent flies seem to be matters of detail. Although different flies extract very different amounts of information from the same visual inputs, all the flies achi eve a high and constant efficiency in their encoding of this information. Fr om previous work it is known that the visual system of an individual fly exhibits s ubstantial changes in coding strategy as it adapts to different ensembles of inpu ts. Rather than converging on the same information rates in different flies, t hese adaptation processes seem to converge on codes of uniformly high efficien cy, supporting the idea that efficiency of representation is a ‘design principle ’ for the system [18]. On average the flies in our ensemble have neural codes in which a substantial amount of information is carried by patterns of spikes. This antiredundancy or synergy among spikes [14] is reduced substantially if we a re forced to use a universal codebook. Mathematically this loss of synergy i n the universal codebook is related to the fact that the rate at which we gain i nformation about the identity of the fly (Fig. 2b) increases with window size ou t toTc∼10 ms: discrimination among flies is enhanced by being able to see pa tterns of spikes in windows of size Tc, implying that the way these patterns are used to encode visual information is unique to each individual. Each indiv idual fly thus gains nearly 50% more information through the use of a code in which patterns of spikes carry extra information, and more than half of this is lost if the fly does not have knowledge of its own identity. Not only is spike timi ng important for the neural code, but the way in which timing is used is spec ific to each individual. Methods Flies, neural recording and stimulus generation Recordings were made from the H1 neuron using standard metho ds: the fly was immobilized in wax, a tungsten microelectrode was inserted through a small hole at the back of the fly’s head, and H1 was identified through its response properties; spikes were detected with a window discriminat or. The stimulus was a rigidly moving pattern of vertical bars, randomly dark or b right, with average intensity ¯I≈100mW /(m2·sr), displayed on a Tektronix 608 high brightness display; bar widths were set equal to the horizontal lattice spacing (interomma- tidial angle) of the compound eye. The fly viewed the display t hrough a round 8diaphragm, showing approximately 30 bars. Frames of the sti mulus pattern were refreshed every 2 ms, and with each new frame the pattern was displayed at a new position. This resulted in an apparent horizontal mo tion of the bar pattern, which is suitable to excite the H1 neuron. The patte rn position was defined by a pseudorandom sequence, simulating a diffusive mo tion or random walk. We draw attention to three points relevant for the pres ent analysis: (1) The flies are freshly caught female Calliphora, so that our ‘ensemble of flies’ ap- proaches a natural ensemble and is not restricted to a highly inbred laboratory stock. (2) In each fly we identify the H1 cell as the unique spik ing neuron in the lobula plate that has a combination of wide field sensitivity , inward directional selectivity for horizontal motion, and contralateral proj ection. (3) Recordings are rejected only if raw electrode signals are excessively n oisy or unstable; in particular we do not select for flies that exhibit mean spike r ates (spontaneous or driven) in a predefined range. Definition of I(W→identity; T) Imagine that we record the response of the H1 neuron from one fl y, but we don’t know which one. A priori there are Nequally likely possibilities. Once we observe the spike train for some time Tour uncertainty is reduced, and hence we gain information about the identity of the fly from which we ar e recording. The average information that an individual word provides about the fly’s identity is I(W→identity; T) =N/summationdisplay i=1Pi/summationdisplay WPi(W)log2/bracketleftbiggPiPi(W) Pens(W)/bracketrightbigg bits, (1) where Pi= 1/Nis the a priori probability that we are recording from fly i and Pens(W) is the probability that any fly in the whole ensemble of flies w ould generate the word W, Pens(W) =N/summationdisplay i=1PiPi(W). (2) The measure I(W→identity; T) has been discussed by Lin [19] as the ‘Jensen– Shannon divergence’ DJSamong the distributions Pi(W). We recall that the problem of finding a measure of similarity among distributio ns is not simple; obvious choices such as the Kullback–Leibler divergence ar e not symmetric, and may have spurious technical requirements such as absolu te continuity of one distribution with respect to the others. Lin proposed DJSas a way of getting around these difficulties, and he showed that DJScan be used to bound other measures of similarity, such as the optimal or Bayesia n probability of identifying correctly the origin of a sample (as in forced ch oice psychophysical discrimination experiments). Here DJSarises not just as an interesting possible measure of similarity (see also [20]), but as the unique answ er to the question of how much information a sample provides about its source. 9Definition of I({W, t} →identity; T) By analogy with Eq. (2) we define the distribution of words use d at time tby the whole ensemble of flies. Pens(W|t) =N/summationdisplay i=1PiPi(W|t), (3) and by analogy with Eq. (1) we can measure the information tha t the word W observed at known tgives us about the identity of the fly, I(W→identity |t;T) =N/summationdisplay i=1Pi/summationdisplay WPi(W|t)log2/bracketleftbiggPiPi(W|t) Pens(W|t)/bracketrightbigg . (4) The more natural quantity is an average over all times t, I({W, s(t)} →identity; T) =/an}bracketle{tI(W→identity |t;T)/an}bracketri}httbits, (5) where /an}bracketle{t· · ·/an}bracketri}ht tdenotes an average over t. Definition of Ii(W→s(t);T) The discussion here follows Refs. [11, 12]. The entropy of th e distribution of words, Si total(T) =−/summationdisplay WPi(W)log2Pi(W)bits, (6) measures the capacity of the neuron to transmit information . At each time twe can define the entropy of the conditional distribution Pi(W|t), which measures the noise in the response to repeated presentations of the sa me movie, Si noise(t;T) =−/summationdisplay WPi(W|t)log2Pi(W|t)bits. (7) The information is the difference between the total entropy o f the cell’s vocab- ulary and the average noise entropy, Ii(W→s(t);T) =Si total(T)− /an}bracketle{tSi noise(t;T)/an}bracketri}htt. (8) For sufficiently large window of time T, we expect that to gain information in proportion to the duration of our observations, Ii(W→s(t);T)≈Ri(W→s(t))·T, (9) so that there is a well defined information rate Ri(W→s(t)). This asymptotic behavior is observed in the data for values of Tthat are relevant to fly behavior. Similar behavior is observed for the total entropy, Si total(T)≈ Si total·T, (10) 10leading to the definition of coding efficiency discussed in the text [13, 15]. Information from single spikes The discussion here follows Ref. [14]. In the experiments th e stimulus runs continuously for a time Tloopand then repeats. When we observe a single spike at time twe learn something about the stimulus in the neighborhood of this time, and if we average this information over all possible ar rival times we obtain the average information carried by a single spike. Because i nformation is mutual, we can relate the information that the spike provides about t he stimulus to the information that the stimulus provides about the occurrenc e of a spike, but this is contained in the time dependent firing rate or post–stimul us time histogram for cell i, ri(t). After some algebra [14], the single spike information tak es the form of an integral that depends only on ri(t), Ii one spike =1 Tloop/integraldisplayTloop 0dtri(t) ¯rilog2/bracketleftbiggri(t) ¯ri/bracketrightbigg bits, (11) where ¯ riis the average spike rate in cell i. If spikes were to carry inf ormation independently, then each cell would transmit Ri ind= ¯riIi one spike bits per second. If the total information rate Ri(W→s(t)) is smaller than this then spikes are redundant (on average) while if the total information rate i s larger then there is synergy [14] among the spikes and the extra information mu st be carried in the temporal patterns of spikes. We can quantify this extra i nformation as a fraction, Fi extra= [Ri(W→s(t))−Ri ind]/Ri ind, (12) as illustrated in Fig. 3b. Information loss with universal decoding If we observe the response of a neuron but don’t know the ident ity of the indi- vidual generating this response, then we are observing resp onses drawn from the ensemble distributions defined above, Pens(W|t) and Pens(W). The information that words provide about the visual stimulus then is Imix(W→s(t);T) =/angbracketleftBigg/summationdisplay WPens(W|t)log2/bracketleftbiggPens(W|t) Pens(W)/bracketrightbigg/angbracketrightBigg tbits. (13) On the other hand, if we know the identity of the fly to be i, we ga in the information Ii(W→s(t);T) from above [Eq’s. (6–8)]. The average information loss is then Iavg loss(W→s(t);T) =N/summationdisplay i=1PiIi(W→s(t);T)−Imix(W→s(t);T).(14) After some algebra it can be shown that this average informat ion loss is related to the information that the neural responses give about the i dentity of the individuals, as defined above: 11Iavg loss(W→s(t);T) = I({W, t} →identity; T) −I(W→identity; T). (15) 12References [1] Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Sys. Tech. J.27,379–423, 623–656 (1948). Reprinted in C. E. Shannon & W. Weav er, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949). [2] Pierce, J. R. Symbols, signals and noise: The nature and process of com- munication (Harper, New York, 1961). [3] Hausen, K. The lobular complex of the fly: structure, func tion, and signif- icance in behavior, in Photoreception and vision in invertebrates (ed Ali, M.) pp. 523–559 (Plenum, New York, 1984). [4] Bullock, T. Structure and Function in the Nervous Systems of Invertebra tes (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1965). [5] Hausen, K. and Wehrhahn, C. Microsurgical lesion of hori zontal cells changes optomotor yaw responses in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 21,211–216 (1983). [6] Lander, E. S. & Waterman, M. S. Calculating the secrets of life: Applica- tions of the mathematical sciences in molecular biology (National Academy Press, Washington, 1995). [7] Victor, J. D. & Purpura, K. Metric–space analysis of spik e trains: theory, algorithms, and application, Network 8,127–164 (1997). [8] Victor, J. D. & Purpura, K. Nature and precision of tempor al coding in visual cortex: a metric–space analysis, J. Neurophysiol. 76,1310–1326 (1996). [9] MacLeod, K., B¨ acker, A. & Laurent, G. Who reads temporal information contained across synchronized and oscillatory spike train s?,Nature 395, 693–698 (1998). [10] Land, M. F. & Collett, T. S. Chasing behavior of houseflie s (Fannia canic- ularis). A description and analysis, J. Comp. Physiol. 89,331–357 (1974). [11] de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., Lewen, G. D., Strong, S. P., Koberle, R. & W. Bialek, Reproducibility and variability in neural spik e trains, Science 275,1805–1808, (1997). [12] Strong, S. P., Koberle, R., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. & Bialek, W. Entropy and information in neural spike trains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80,197– 200 (1998). 1854–1857 (1991). [13] Rieke, F., Warland, D., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. & Bi alek, W. Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997). 13[14] Brenner, N., Strong, S. P., Koberle, R., de Ruyter van St eveninck, R. & Bialek, W. Synergy in a neural code, Neural Comp. in press (2000). [15] Rieke, F., Warland, D. & Bialek, W. Coding efficiency and i nformation rates in sensory neurons, Europhys. Lett. 22,151–156 (1993). [16] de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. & Bialek, W. Real–time perf ormance of a movement sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: Codi ng and in- formation transfer in short spike sequences, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 234,379–414 (1988). [17] Spudich, J. L. & Koshland Jr., D. E. Non–genetic individ uality: chance in the single cell, Nature 262,467–471 (1976). [18] Barlow, H. B. Possible principles underlying the trans formation of sensory messages, in Sensory Communication, W. Rosenblith, ed., pp. 217–234 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1961). [19] Lin, J., Divergence measures based on the Shannon entro py,IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory ,37,145–151 (1991). [20] El-Yaniv, R., Fine, S. & Tishby, N. Agnostic classificat ion of Markovian sequences, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10 (eds Jordan, M., Kearns, M. & Solla, S. A.) pp. 465–471 (MIT Press, 1997). 14Figure 1 . Different flies’ spike trains and word statistics. (a)All flies view the same random vertical bar pattern moving across their visual field with a time dependent velocity, part of which is shown (see Methods sect ion for details). In the experiment, a 40 sec waveform is presented repeatedly , 90 times. (b)A set of 45 response traces to the part of the stimulus shown in ( a) from each of the 9 flies. The traces are taken from the segment of the experi ment where the transient responses have decayed. Spike trains from flies 1 a nd 6 are colored by red and blue, respectively, which we will use as a color cod e for the other parts of the figure. (c)Example of construction of the local word distributions. Zooming in on a segment of the repeated responses of fly 1 to the visual stimuli (see green rectangle in (b)), the fly’s spike trains are divid ed into contiguous 2 ms bins, and the spikes in each of the bins are counted. E.g., we get the 6 letter words that the fly used at time 3306 ms into the input tr ace.(d) Similar as (c) for fly 6. (e)The distributions of words that flies 1 and 6 used at time t= 3306 ms from the beginning of the stimulus. The time depende nt distributions, P1(W|t= 3306 ms) and P6(W|t= 3306 ms) are presented as a function of the binary value of the actual ’word’, e.g., bina ry word value′17′ stands for the word′010001′.(f)Collecting the words that each of the flies used through all of the visual stimulus presentations, we ge t the total word distributions for flies 1 and 6, P1(W) and P6(W). Figure 2 . Distinguishing one fly from others based on spike trains. (a)The average rate of information gained about the identity of a fly , given the distribu- tion of words that it used throughout the stimulus presentat ions, as a function of the word size used. The information rate is saturated even before we reach the maximal word length used; for more discussion of word len gths see Meth- ods. Following Figure 1, Red marks are the average rate of inf ormation that the word distribution of fly 1 give about its identity, compared w ith the word dis- tribution mixture of all of the flies. The connecting line is u sed for clarification only. Blue marks the results for fly 6, and the black marks the a verage over all 9 flies. See methods for discussion of error bars calculation .(b)Similar to the computation done for (a), we can compute the average amount o f information that is gained about the identity of the fly, give its word dist ribution at a spe- cific time, compared with the mixture of the word distributio n of all of the 9 flies. Averaging over all times, we get the average amount of i nformation gained about the identity of fly 1 based on its time dependent word dis tributions (red), fly 6 (blue), and the average over the 9 flies (black). Figure 3 . The information about the stimulus that a fly’s spike train c arries is correlated with firing rate, and yet a significant part is in th e temporal structure. (a)The rate at the H1 spike train provides information about the visual stimulus is shown as a function of the average spike rate, with each fly p roviding a single data point (Fly 1 is marked by a red point and Fly 6 by a blue one) . The linear fit of the data points for the 9 flies corresponds to a uni versal rate of 2.39±0.24 bits /spike, as noted in the text. (b)The extra amount of information that the temporal structure of the spike train of each of the fl ies carry about 15the stimulus, as a function of the average firing rate of the fly [see Eq. (12) in Methods]. The average amount of additional information tha t is carried by the temporal structure of the spike trains, over the population is 45 ±17%. Figure 4 . What different flies mean by the same words. The word-trigger ed averages are shown for flies 1 (red) and 6 (blue) for 4 different words. Similar to the computation of spike triggered averages, we compute the average velocity profile of the movie presented to the flies, preceding 7-lette r binary words. (a) The average stimulus waveform preceding the word′0000000′for Flies 1 (red) and 6 (blue), is shown as a function of the time relative to the end of the word (shown in actual time order on the right top side of the panel) .(b-d) Word triggered averages for 3 other words, reflecting that the wav eforms haves similar rough structure, and that the difference between the flies is i n the details. 16−2000200Velocity (°/s)Stimulus 0 0 1 0 0 0 TrialFly 1 3306 33180 1 0 0 0 1 Time (ms)TrialFly 6 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Time (s)Fly 9Fly 8Fly 7Fly 6Fly 5Fly 4Fly 3Fly 2Fly 1Spike trains 0.30.20.1 00.10.20.3 word probabilityPFly 1(W|t=3306) PFly 6(W|t=3306)Word distribution @ t 0204060 0.7 0.60.040.02 00.020.04 0.6 0.7 // // binary word valueword probabilityPFly 1(W) PFly 6(W)Total word distribution05101520253000.010.020.030.040.05 Word length (msec)Info about identity (bits/msec)Fly 6 vs mixture Fly 1 vs mixture 051015202530 Word length (msec) 0204060020406080100 Firing rate (spikes/sec)Extra information from temporal structure (%) 0204060050100150 Firing rate (spikes/sec)Information about stimulus (bits/sec) −20−10010203040 0000000 Stimulus velocity ( °/sec) 0000001 −80 −60 −40 −20 0−20−10010203040 0010000 Time from end of word (msec)Stimulus velocity ( °/sec) −80 −60 −40 −20 0 0010001 Time from end of word (msec)

arXiv:physics/0005044v1 [physics.gen-ph] 17 May 2000Lagrangian Approaches of Dirac and Feynman to Quantum Mechanics Yong-Gwan Yi∗ February 21, 2014 Abstract Lagrangian method in quantum mechanics is discussed in a ped agogical context. It is pointed out that introduction of the action pr inciple into the quantum theory is much in the way of a formal correspondence. A general formulation of the action principle is outlined, embodying the main features of Dirac’s and Feynman’s approaches to quantum mechanics. T his review is carried to a point further than that reached by these authors , in the discussion of the action principle and correspondence. Judged by a crit erion of corre- spondence arguments energy levels of harmonic oscillator m ust be En=n¯hω instead of being En= (n+ 1/2)¯hω. 1 Introduction Quantum mechanics, as usually understood, was built up on a f oundation of analogy with the Hamiltonian theory of classical mechanics. The Lag rangian method in quantum mechanics was introduced by Dirac [1] on the mathema tical foundation of the analogy between canonical transformation and unitary t ransformation, which was developed to bring out the quantum analogue of the princi ple of least action in classical mechanics. The Lagrangian approach of Dirac wa s further studied by Feynman [2], who has ultimately developed it into the integr al equation formulation of quantum mechanics. In this review I shall try to pick out the essential logical po ints of the devel- opments. We first review the essential changes in physical id ea required by the Lagrangian method in quantum mechanics. We then show how a ge neral action function method in quantum mechanics can be outlined, embod ying the main fea- tures of Dirac’s and Feynman’s formalisms. This review is ca rried to a point further than that reached by those authors, in Lagrangian approach t o quantum mechanics. In the continuation of reasoning the correspondence of the S chr¨ odinger equation to the classical Hamiltonian is reviewed and the resulting que stion that has opened to us is discussed. ∗Han-Shin Apt. 121-402 Dobong-dong Dobong-ku, Seoul, 132-0 12 Korea 12 Action Function Methods In 1933, Dirac took up the question of what corresponds in the quantum theory to the principle of least action in classical mechanics. The equation of motion of the classical theory causes the dynamical variables to vary in such a way that their values at any time t′are connected with their values at any other time tby a contact transformation. In the quantum theory the wave func tion at any time t′ is related through a transformation function <x|x′>to the wave function at any other timet. On the mathematical foundation of the analogy between the c lassical and quantum equations of motion he shows that <x|x′>corresponds to eiS(x,x′)/¯h, (1) where the action S(x,x′) is the time integral from t′totof the Lagrangian L taken along the path. In such a way the phases of the quantum-t heoretical wave function have just as great a physical significance as their c lassical analogues. This is the natural extension of the well-known result that the ph ase of wave function corresponds to the action function in classical theory. By i ntroducing a sequence of intermediate times into the time interval, one may write S(x,x′) as S(x,x′) =S(x,xn) +S(xn,xn−1) +···+S(x2,x1) +S(x1,x′). (2) The corresponding quantum equation is written <x|x′>=/integraldisplay ···/integraldisplay <x|xn>dx n<xn|xn−1>···<x2|x1>dx 1<x1|x′>. (3) Equation (3) is valid only when we substitute for the interme diate coordinates in its right-hand side their values for the real trajectory, sm all variations in which values leave Sstationary. It is the process of substituting these values f or the intermediate coordinates which corresponds to the integra tions over all values for the intermediate coordinates in (3). The quantum analogue o f the action principle is thus absorbed in the composition law (3). In 1948, Feynman showed how the physical idea of Dirac could b e extended to define a probability amplitude (wave function) for a speci fied path in space- time. His formulation contained as its essential idea the co ncept of a probability amplitude associated with a specified motion as a function of time. There a wave functionψ(x′,t′) depends only upon the region previous to time t′, and is completely defined if that region is known. It does not depend, in any way, upon what will be done to the system after time t′. The transformation theory of Dirac allows us to considerψ(x′,t′) as representing a state in a representation in which x′is diagonal, whileψ(x,t) represents the same state in a representation in which xis diagonal. They are therefore related through the transformation func tion that relates the representations: ψ(x,t) =/integraltext <x|x′>ψ(x′,t′)dx′, ψ(x′,t′) =/integraltext <x′|x′′>ψ(x′′,t′′)dx′′, ···.(4) Equation (4) was interpreted physically as the expression o f Huygens’ principle for matter waves. If the amplitude of the wave is known on a giv en surface, in 2particular the surface consisting of all x′at timet′, its value at a particular nearby point at time tis a sum of contributions from all points of the surface at t′. Each contribution is delayed in phase by an amount proportional t o the action it would require to get from the surface to the point along the path of l east action of classical mechanics. The foregoing review is only a sketch, but it may be sufficient t o characterize the development in formulation of the action principle in quant um mechanics. Looking at the formalism equation (4) inspires an idea for the genera lization of present the- ories of matter waves, a generalization necessary to encomp ass present formalisms. Equation (4) is a typical representation of the wave nature o f matter, which dis- plays close analogies with classical mechanics, but at the s ame time preserves the characteristic features of the law of propagation of waves. Applying directly to simple examples, Feynman had shown that the wave function so defined actually satisfied the Schr¨ odinger equation. Although the proof was detailed, the method deviated from a general way. Intuitively it seems more desir able to carry through to a generalized theory of integral equation formulation. W ith this very reason I now strive to clarify the mathematically formal content of h is approach and present its general method in quantum mechanics. First of all we should mention the principle of least action i n quantum mechanics. As is well known there was little difficulty in setting up a Lagr angian for which the Euler-Lagrangian equation, as obtained from the variation al principle, agrees with the Schr¨ odinger equation. But the variational approach mu st be more than just a matter of academic curiosity. This is because the formal ana logy with the classical mechanics is actually realized in such a Lagrangian rather t han Hamiltonian: (∇S)2 2m−V←→/integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg¯h2 2m(∇ψ∗)·(∇ψ)−ψ∗Vψ/bracketrightbigg dr. (5) From the form to which it corresponds, we infer the principle of least action to be satisfied in quantum mechanics: δ/integraldisplay Ldt= 0←→δ/integraldisplay /integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg¯h2 2m(∇ψ∗)·(∇ψ)−ψ∗Vψ/bracketrightbigg drdt= 0.(6) Indeed it is more accurate to consider the Schr¨ odinger equa tion as induced by the Euler-Lagrange equation for a variational problem which ha s been formulated as above. Although the Schr¨ odinger equation was deduced on a f oundation of analogy with the Hamiltonian of the corresponding classical system , the same relation does not always hold between operators as between the correspond ing classical physical quantities. In the Schr¨ odinger equation ∇2ψdoes not rigorously correspond to (∇S)2in classical mechanics. As can be seen in the next section, it involves an additional term corresponding to ∇2S. Only in the action principle can we find the quantum analogue of the classical equation of motion as clos ely as possible. The close analogy between <x|x′>and the quantity eiS(x,x′)/¯hwas pointed out by Dirac on the mathematical treatment inherent in the quant um theory. Therein the transformation function < x|x′>corresponding to eiS(x,x′)/¯hwas regarded as connecting the two representations in which xandx′are diagonal respectively. Physically the square of the modulus of <x|x′>was interpreted as giving the rela- tive a priori probability of any state yielding the results xandx′when observations 3are made of the coordinates at time tand at time t′. Accordingly we could consider <x|x′>as the amplitude for arrival at x,tstarting from x′,t′. It seems therefore that the simplest and most natural interpretation would be t o regard< x|x′> as a quantum-theoretical expression of Green’s function fo r matter waves. Such an interpretation leads us consequently to identify (3) wit h a quantum-theoretical expression of Huygens’ principle for matter waves, by viewi ng the transformation functions in (3) in terms of the Green’s functions. In this wa y equation (4) appears in a new light. Let<r|r′>represent the generalization of <x|x′>to three dimensions. Just as the Green’s function is associated with the Helmholtz wav e equation, so we may associate with the Schr¨ odinger wave equation a correspond ing function <r|r′>, defined by /parenleftbig ∇2+k2/parenrightbig <r|r′>=−δ(r−r′) (7) from/parenleftbig ∇2+k2/parenrightbig ψ(r,t) =/parenleftbig ∇2+k2/parenrightbig/integraldisplay <r|r′>ψ(r′,t′)dr′. We can illustrate the relation of (7) to the Sch¨ odinger wave equation by introducing the de Broglie wave-length for a moving particle. For bound s tates in which the particle is restrained by the external force to a particular region, equation (7) would result in the homogeneous differential equation for which an alytic solutions are possible. However, for unbound states in which the particle can approach from and recede to infinite distance, it leads to the inhomogeneou s integral equation of scattering theory, ψ(r) =φ(r)−/integraldisplay <r|r′>V(r′)ψ(r′)dr′, (8) whereφis a solution of the homogeneous equation. Equation (7) defin es the retarded Green’s function or free-particle propagator appropriate for (8). We may consider its Fourier transform, in terms of which the transformation function is written 1 k′2−k2+iǫ, ǫ−→0. (9) By making use of this Fourier transform of <r|r′>, we can see in (8) the formal expression for Born’s integral equation formulation. We no w approach the integral equation formulation of scattering theory by way of the acti on principle. It is assumed that the effect of scattering center on the parti cles can be repre- sented by a potential energy V(r′,t′) which is appreciably different from zero only within a finite region and time. We may expect to approach it by noting that al- terations of the wave states on randr′arise from a change in action. We can thus specify the effect of scattering by dividing S(r,r′) into two parts. Let S(r,r′) =S0(r,r′)−/integraldisplay V(r′,t′)dt′, (10) whereS0(r,r′) is the action of the free particle and V(r′,t′) is the external disturbing potential. For the electromagnetic interaction, the S−matrix expansion turns out to 4converge rapidly so that we obtain results that agree extrem ely well with observation just by considering the first order approximation. Thus we ma y write eiS(r,r′)/¯h=eiS0(r,r′)/¯h−(i/¯h)/integraltext V(r′,t′)dt′ ≈eiS0(r,r′)/¯h/bracketleftBig 1−(i/¯h)/integraldisplay V(r′,t′)dt′/bracketrightBig , (11) from which we infer that ψ(r,t) =φ(r,t)−/integraldisplay eiS0(r,r′)/¯h/bracketleftBig (i/¯h)/integraldisplay V(r′,t′)dt′/bracketrightBig ψ(r′,t′)dr′. (12) This may also be written symbolically as ψ(r,t) =φ(r,t)−/integraldisplay <r|r′>/bracketleftBig (i/¯h)/integraldisplay V(r′,t′)dt′/bracketrightBig ψ(r′,t′)dr′. (13) Equation (13) can be iterated to give the wave function ψin terms of Vandφand hence to construct the exact propagator if the perturbing po tentialVis weak. The formulation fits in with treatment of the problem of a system t hat makes transition from one state to others under the action of perturbation. In particular, by (11), the connection with the radiation theory of quantum electro dynamics in which the radiation interaction is treated as a small perturbation is naturally established [3]. One may compare this with Schwinger’s treatment in which the effect of a small perturbation has been described by the variation of the tran sformation δ(eiS/¯h) = (iδS/¯h)eiS/¯h[4]. If we turn on another potential V(r′′,t′′) for an interval△t′′at timet′′>t′, the additional contribution to the wave function for t>t′′is, in analogy to (11), eiS0(r,r′′)/¯h/bracketleftBig 1−(i/¯h)/integraldisplay V(r′′,t′′)dt′′/bracketrightBig ψ(r′′,t′′). (14) The total wave arriving at ( r,t) is then built up by summing over all possible places and times for ( r′′,t′′): /integraltext /integraltext eiS0(r,r′′)/¯h/bracketleftBig 1−(i/¯h)/integraltext V(r′′,t′′)dt′′/bracketrightBig dr′′ ×eiS0(r′′,r′)/¯h/bracketleftBig 1−(i/¯h)/integraltext V(r′,t′)dt′/bracketrightBig ψ(r′,t′)dr′,(15) which may thus be written out in the form /integraltext /integraltext <r|r′′> dr′′<r′′|r′>ψ(r′,t′)dr′ −(i/¯h)/integraltext /integraltext /integraltext <r|r′′> dr′′<r′′|r′>V(r′,t′)ψ(r′,t′)dt′dr′ −(i/¯h)/integraltext /integraltext /integraltext <r|r′′>V(r′′,t′′)dt′′dr′′<r′′|r′>ψ(r′,t′)dt′dr′ +(i/¯h)2/integraltext /integraltext /integraltext /integraltext <r|r′′>V(r′′,t′′)dt′′dr′′<r′′|r′>V(r′,t′)ψ(r′,t′)dt′dr′.(16) The argument can be extended to the case that ψis a state with four indices to which relativistic Hamiltonian is applied. In this case w e should expect the corresponding function to be associated with the Dirac wave equation: (γµpµ−mc)<r|r′>=−δ(r−r′), (17) 5where we have used covariant relativistic notations, four m atricesγµand four- momentum pµ. The covariant transformation < r|r′>as the free-particle propa- gator is given by Fourier transforming to momentum space, by 1 γµpµ−mc+iǫorγµpµ+mc p2−m2c2+iǫ. (18) This is known as Feynman’s free propagator. In parallel with the previous argu- ments we may apply the propagator formalism now to scatterin g problems of quan- tum electrodynamics. Note that the formalism thus develope d fits into Feynman’s version of quantum electrodynamics [5]. Given the wave function defined in (4), all of the machinery of operator equation can be developed. In the development Feynman denominated th e integral equation of (4) as essentially a third formulation of non-relativist ic quantum theory, following the matrix algebra of Heisenberg and the differential equati on of Schr¨ odinger. The formulation contains as its essential idea the concept of a s uperposition of matter waves the phases of which correspond to the action. However, it is not a fundamen- tally new approach; it is the integral form of the Schr¨ oding er equation in which the transformation function has become a link relating the two e quations, differential and integral. With the Green’s function G(r,r′) in place of <r|r′>equation (4) was the starting point of his approach in the next year to quantum ele ctrodynamics. There was no remark concerning the relation of <r|r′>toG. Only shortly later did Feynman state that they were identical for small time interv al [6]. However, the perfect parallelism in the formulation between <r|r′>andGmakes it obvious that they are entirely identical. The reconciliation of <r|r′>withGcertainly unifies the mathematically formal contents of his approaches to qua ntum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics. 3 Wave Equation-Function Relationship A very brief and simple derivation of the Schr¨ odinger equat ion is given by substi- tuting the de Broglie wave-length into the well-known equat ion for the propagation of elastic wave [7]. The Schr¨ odinger equation is in a sense t he quantum-mechanical translation of the relation connecting energy and momentum for a particle, the energy and momentum being represented in this quantum langu age by differential operators acting on the wave function according to the corre spondence rule. When we look back at the Schr¨ odinger equation from such a point of view, we realize that in this wave equation has been assumed the constancy of t he momentum of a particle. This is because in general ∇2ψ=i∇·(kψ) = (i∇·k−k2)ψ, and hence the correspondence operation enables one to deduce the equa tion Eψ=−¯h2 2m∇2ψ−¯h 2mi(∇·p)ψ+Vψ, (19) from the classical Hamiltonian relation E=p2/2m+V. On the assumption that ∇·p= 0, the translation of Hamiltonian into the operator equati on results in the Schr¨ odinger equation. But when ∇·p/negationslash= 0, the translation leads to the Schr¨ odinger 6equation with an additional term. The Schr¨ odinger equatio n is therefore a special case of∇·p= 0. If the potential energy does not have a very simple form, the s olution of the Schr¨ odinger equation even in one dimension is usually a com plicated problem which requires the use of approximation methods. But if the potent ial energy does not vary appreciably in a distance comparable with the wave-len gth, one might try a solution of the plane-wave form except that the phase now is not simply pro- portional to coordinates. This method is called Wentzel-Kr amer-Brillouin (WKB) approximation, although the general mathematical techniq ue had been used earlier by Liouville, Rayleigh, and Jeffrey [8]. It is useful in solvi ng a one-dimensional Schr¨ odinger equation for highly excited states. It leads t o the approximate wave function ψ(x)≈1/radicalbig k(x)exp/bracketleftBig ±i/integraldisplayx k(x)dx/bracketrightBig , (20) wherek(x) = [2m(E−V(x))]1/2/¯h. While the Schr¨ odinger wave equation is given by using the de Broglie wave- length in the wave equation of elastic waves, it can also be co nsidered as originating from the wave function of matter waves. We may thus start with the wave function defined in (4). However, starting with the wave function ψ(x)≈exp/bracketleftBig ±i/integraldisplayx k(x)dx/bracketrightBig , (21) the wave equation is contrary modified here so that the formal analogy with classical mechanics is actually realized. The precise translation of classical Hamiltonian into the operator equation leads to adopt (19) as wave equation of a particle in such a potential, and in this case the WKB approximation method its elf loses its evident physical foundation. Hence we arrive at different results fo r the correlation of the wave equation and the wave function depending upon whether w e start with the wave equation or with the wave function. It does not seem to be a problem of choice between the two alter natives. The lack of the correspondence of the Schr¨ odinger equation to c lassical Hamiltonian is in itself a defect of the formalism. Although the WKB approxi mation has been used absolutely, the contrary change of wave equation itself app ears to us of considerable physical reasoning when we consider the equation of propaga tion of elastic waves being altered in form in an inhomogeneous medium. In this alt ernative approach the advantage is that we treat plane-wave solutions which ar e covariant and are continuous at turning points. We now consider how the probability of tunneling through a ba rrier can be calculated from the present point of view. We assume that E < V (x) in the interval between aandb. If the potential barrier is continuous at turning points, the transmission coefficient is automatically contained in t he development of the wave function and is identified itself with the action functi on inside the barrier. The effect of barrier penetration therefore appears as |ψ(b)|2≈e−2/integraltextb aκ(x)dx|ψ(a)|2fromψ(b)≈ei/integraltextb ak(x)dxψ(a), (22) 7whereκ(x) = [2m(V(x)−E)]1/2/¯h. Although starting points are different, the results of calculation are in effect equivalent. The develop ment of the wave function with position coordinate gives rather a simple way of descri bing the transmission coefficient. 4 Energy Eigenvalues of Harmonic Oscillator In the preceding section we have considered the problem pres ented by differential operators that act on the wave function. If the momentum eige nvalue is not a constant, the second differentiation with respect to coordi nate of wave function becomes the general effect of multiplication of the function byi∇·k−k2, not simply by−k2. This is actually so for the harmonic oscillator because its momentum depends linearly upon the position coordinate. It is theref ore necessary to review the harmonic oscillator equation. The linear harmonic oscillator is the one-dimensional moti on of a point mass m attracted to an equilibrium position x= 0 by a force that is proportional to the displacement xfrom it. The restoring force can be represented by the potent ial energyV(x) =mω2x2/2. Insertion of this in the Schr¨ odinger equation for a one- dimensional system gives the equation −¯h2 2md2ψ dx2+1 2mω2x2ψ=Eψ. (23) Introducing for convenience the dimensionless independen t variableξ= (mω/¯h)1/2x and the dimensionless eigenvalue λ= 2E/¯hω, we can put the equation in the form d2ψ dξ2+ (λ−ξ2)ψ= 0. (24) The solution of this equation is facilitated by first examini ng the dominant behavior ofψin the asymptotic region ξ→∞. For sufficiently large ξit is apparent that ψ(ξ) =e−ξ2/2satisfies (24), so far as the leading terms which are of order ξ2ψ are concerned. This enables one to find an exact solution of (2 4) of the form ψ(ξ) =H(ξ)e−ξ2/2. Substitution of this into (24) gives as the equation for H(ξ) H′′−2ξH′+ (λ−1)H= 0, (25) where primes denote differentiation with respect to ξ. The polynomial of order nthat is a solution of this equation with λ−1 = 2nis called the nth Hermite polynomial Hn(ξ). We have seen the method employed in solving the Schr¨ odinger equation for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. The procedure consi sts of the determination of the form of ψin the region of large value of ξ, and the subsequent discussion of the behavior of ψforξsmall. The procedure starts with the asymptotic solution of the equation. The derivatives of the asymptotic solution giveξ2ψ−ψ, but the second term has been neglected in the region considered. But when substituted the resulting form of exact solution back into the Schr¨ odinger equation, the derivatives again produce an additional term that corresponds to the ter m neglected, the last 8term on the left of (25). This term is a result of the asymptoti c solution not fitting to the wave equation. In principle it corresponds to an addit ional term which appears in the Schr¨ odinger equation as a result of ∇·p/negationslash= 0. Basically it is due to the lack of the correspondence inherent in the Schr¨ odinger equation to the classical Hamiltonian relation. As has already been remarked, the modification is to include t he term in the Schr¨ odinger equation. The Schr¨ odinger equation is then p ut into the form d2ψ dξ2+ (λ+ 1−ξ2)ψ= 0. (26) In consequence of this equation the equation for H(ξ) becomes H′′−2ξH′+λH= 0. (27) As characteristic for the difference between (25) and (27) on e can write down the change in the energy eigenvalues En= (n+ 1/2)¯hω−→En=n¯hω. (28) Written in this way, the only appeal to the oscillator proble m is to accept the energy eigenvalues of integer multiples of ¯ hωin place of their half-integer multiples involving the finite values of the ground-state energy level . We are thus led to reconsider physical reality of the zero-point energy. Befo re we relate the zero-point energy with the uncertainty principle, indeed, we need to co nsider whether it is actually possible to associate any energy with the ground-s tate of zero photon by means of observable quantities. This result of the modification may be regarded as retrogress ing to the result of the old quantum theory in a more or less artificial and intenti onal manner rather then retrieving its justification. However, the physical re asoning which leads to (19) is so clear that the result can be justified from an ingenious c onsideration of corre- spondence arguments. As support for the validity of the resu lt one might mention that the polynomial method proceeds here on consistent form ulation. In those re- formulation the principle of correspondence that had been l ost have automatically been restored. The problem of the ground-state energy eigenvalue can also b e discussed in the algebraic treatment of the harmonic oscillator equatio n. To distinguish the momentum operator from its eigenvalue we denote the operato r by boldface type. Let|n >be an eigenstate of Hwith the eigenvalue Enspecified by the number of particles present in the state. A lowest energy eigenstat e|0>is defined by the energy-lowering operator p−imωx, such that /parenleftbig p−imωx/parenrightbig |0>= 0. (29) The lowest energy eigenvalue has thus been found by operatin g on it with its her- mitian adjoint opeartor: /parenleftbig p+imωx/parenrightbig/parenleftbig p−imωx/parenrightbig |0>=/parenleftbig p2+m2ω2x2−m¯hω/parenrightbig |0>= 2m/parenleftbig E−¯hω/2/parenrightbig |0>= 0.(30) 9From (29) one may say that the operator pyields the same eigenvalue as the operatorimωxdoes. Since the operator pacts on everything that stands to the right, repeated application of pto the energy eigenstate yields the value m¯hω in addition to the eigenvalue p2. Taking into account the momentum operator- eigenvalue relationship, equation (30) should be modified t o /parenleftbig p+imωx/parenrightbig/parenleftbig p−imωx/parenrightbig |0>=/parenleftbig p2+m2ω2x2/parenrightbig |0>= 2mE|0>= 0.(31) In this regard|0>must be an eigenstate of Hwith the eigenvalue zero. In the hydrogen atom angular momentum is represented by quan tum numbers characterizing energy eigenstates. Correspondence of the Schr¨ odinger equation to Hamiltonian is therefore exact and its polynomial method is self-consistent there. 5 Conclusion Schr¨ odinger, pursuing and generalizing the notion of matt er waves of de Broglie, discovered the equation of propagation of the wave function representing a given quantum system. But one may say that the physical representa tion of the wave function itself was not until, from the Lagrangian approach of Dirac, Feynman de- veloped the expression of Huygens’ principle for matter wav es. The fundamental point reviewed here is that the correspondence is based upon the action principle that stays as close to the classical equation of motion as pos sible. From this point of view we have reviewed the correspondence of Hamiltonian o perator to its eigen- value. Judged by a criterion of correspondence arguments en ergy levels of harmonic oscillator must be En=n¯hωinstead of being En= (n+ 1/2)¯hω. References [1] P. A. M. Dirac, Phys. Zeit. der Sowjetunion 3, 64 (1933); The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford, 1958), 4th ed., p.125. [2] R. P. Feynman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 267 (1948). [3] F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 75, 486 (1949). [4] J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 914 (1951); Phys. Rev. 91, 713 (1953); Quantum Kinematics and Dynamics (W. A. Benjamin, 1970). [5] R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 76, 749 (1949); Phys. Rev. 76, 769 (1949). [6] R. F. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 80, 440 (1950). [7] H. E. White, Introduction to Atomic Spectra (McGraw-Hill, 1934), p.56. [8] L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, 1968), 3rd ed., p.269. 10

arXiv:physics/0005045v1 [physics.atm-clus] 18 May 2000Melting behavior of large disordered sodium clusters. Andr´ es Aguado Departamento de F´ ısica Te´ orica, Universidad de Valladol id, Valladolid 47011, Spain The melting-like transition in disordered sodium clusters NaN, with N=92 and 142 is studied by using a first-principles constant-energy molecular dyna mics simulation method. Na 142, whose atoms are distributed in two (surface and inner) main shells with different radial distances to the center of mass of the cluster, melts in two steps: the first one , at≈130 K, is characterized by a high intrashell mobility of the atoms, and the second, homog eneous melting, at ≈270 K, involves diffusive motion of all the atoms across the whole cluster vol ume (both intrashell and intershell displacements are allowed). On the contrary, the melting of Na92proceeds gradually over a very wide temperature interval, without any abrupt step visible in the thermal or structural melting indicators. The occurrence of well defined steps in the melti ng transition is then shown to be related to the existence of a distribution of the atoms in shells. The reby we propose a necessary condition for a cluster to be considered rigorously amorphouslike (to tally disordered), namely that there are no space regions of the cluster where the local value of the at omic density is considerably reduced. Na92is the only cluster from the two considered that verifies this condition, so its thermal behavior can be considered as representative of that expected for amo rphous clusters. Na 142, on the other hand, has a discernible atomic shell structure and should be considered instead as just partially disordered. The thermal behavior of these two clusters is al so compared to that of icosahedral (totally ordered) sodium clusters of the same sizes. PACS numbers: 36.40.Ei 64.70.Dv I. INTRODUCTION Cluster melting is a topic of current theoretical1–7and experimental8–11interest, motivated by the observation of several size-dependent properties which have no ana- log in the bulk phase. Between those properties, we can mention the following: (i) the melting like transition does not occur at a well defined temperature as in the solid, but spreads over a finite temperature interval that widens as the cluster size decreases. The lower end of that in- terval defines the freezing temperature T fbelow which the cluster is completely solidlike, their constituent ato ms just vibrating about their equilibrium positions. The up- per part of the interval defines the melting temperature above which all the atoms can diffuse across the clus- ter and the “liquid” phase is completely established. Be- tween those two temperatures the cluster is not fully solid nor fully liquid.12It is in that transition region where the cluster-specific behavior emerges: (ia) Premelting effects like partial melting of the cluster (the most usual case is surface melting)13or structural isomerizations upon heating, which lead to a melting in steps.14(ib) The dy- namic coexistence regime, where the cluster can fluctu- ate in time between being completely solid or liquid.15 (ii) Strong nonmonotonic variations of the melting tem- perature with size have been found in recent experiments on sodium clusters.9The maxima in the melting temper- ature are not in exact correspondence with either elec- tronic or atomic shell closing numbers, but bracketed by the two, suggesting that both effects are relevant to the melting process. It is important to note that the values of T fand T mas defined above are not yet amenableto the experiments, and that the experimental melting temperature is somewhere between these two values. Previously6,7we have reported density functional orbital-free molecular dynamics (OFMD) simulations of the melting process in sodium clusters Na N, with N=8,20,55,92, and 142. The OFMD technique16is com- pletely analogous to the method devised by Car and Parrinello (CP) to perform dynamic simulations at an ab initio level,17but the electron density is taken as the dynamic variable,18as opposed to the Kohn-Sham (KS) orbitals19in the original CP method. This tech- nique has been already used both in solid state20,21and cluster2,22,23physics. In contrast to simulations which use empirical interatomic potentials, the detailed elec- tronic structure and the electronic contribution to the energy and the forces on the ions are recalculated effi- ciently every atomic time-step. The main advantage over KS-based methods is that the computational effort to update the electronic system increases linearly with the cluster size N, in contrast to the N3scaling of orbital- based methods. Indeed, these were the first molecular dynamics simulations of large clusters as Na 92and Na 142 that included an explicit treatment of the electronic de- grees of freedom. A very important issue in the simulations of cluster melting is the election of the low-temperature isomer to be heated. A good knowledge of the ground state struc- ture (global minimum) is required, as the details of the melting transition are known to be isomer-dependent.24 But the problem of performing a realistic global optimiza- tion search is exponentially difficult as size increases, so finding the global minima of Na 92and Na 142becomes im- 1practical. In our previous work7we directly started from icosahedral isomers, as there is some experimental8and theoretical25indications that suggest icosahedral packing in sodium clusters, and found a good agreement with the experimental results of Haberland’s group.9However, we were unable to find those icosahedral structures by an un- constrained search method as simulated annealing, which always led to disordered isomers both for Na 92and Na 142. Although the icosahedral structures are more stable in all the cases, the energy difference between both isomers is approximately 0.02 eV/atom, which is very small. Amor- phouslike structures have been found recently to be the ground state isomers of gold clusters for a number of sizes,26,27and pair potential calculations performed by Doye and Wales predict that the amorphous state is fa- vored by long potential ranges.28The specific features of those structures are little or no spatial symmetry and a pair distribution function typical of glasses. Besides that, one usually finds a large number of amorphouslike isomers nearly degenerate in energy, which suggests that they occupy a substantial fraction of the phase space available to the cluster. Both the energy proximity to the more stable icosahedral isomers and the large en- tropy associated with the amorphous part of the phase space make plausible that amorphous isomers could be present in the experimental cluster beams, so their ther- mal properties deserve specific investigation. Apart from this, the study of melting in amorphouslike clusters is intrinsically interesting from a theoretical point of view . Thus, the goals of this work are to study the mecha- nisms by which the melting-like transition proceeds in two disordered isomers of Na 92and Na 142, to study the influence on the melting behavior of the disorder degree, and to make a meaningful comparison with the melting behavior of the corresponding icosahedral isomers. In the next section we briefly present some technical details of the method. The results are presented and discussed in section III and, finally, section IV summarizes our main conclusions. II. THEORY The orbital-free molecular dynamics method is a Car- Parrinello total energy scheme17which uses an explicit kinetic-energy functional of the electron density, and has the electron density as the dynamical variable, as op- posed to the KS single particle wavefunctions. The main features of the energy functional and the calcula- tion scheme have been described at length in previous work,16,22,2,6and details of our method are as described by Aguado et al.6In brief, the electronic kinetic energy functional of the electron density, n(/vector r), corresponds to the gradient expansion around the homogeneous limit through second order18,29–31 Ts[n] =TTF[n] +1 9TW[n], (1)where the first term is the Thomas-Fermi functional (Hartree atomic units have been used) TTF[n] =3 10(3π2)2/3/integraldisplay n(/vector r)5/3d/vector r, (2) and the second is the lowest order gradient correction, where TW, the von Weizs¨ acker term, is given by TW[n] =1 8/integraldisplay| ∇n(/vector r)|2 n(/vector r)d/vector r. (3) The local density approximation is used for exchange and correlation.32,33In the external field acting on the elec- trons, Vext(/vector r) =/summationtext nv(/vector r−/vectorRn), we take vto be the lo- cal pseudopotential of Fiolhais et al.,34which reproduces well the properties of bulk sodium and has been shown to have good transferability to sodium clusters.35The cluster is placed in a unit cell of a cubic superlattice, and the set of plane waves periodic in the superlattice is used as a basis set to expand the valence density. Following Car and Parrinello,17the coefficients of that expansion are regarded as generalized coordinates of a set of ficti- tious classical particles, and the corresponding Lagrange equations of motion for the ions and the electron density distribution are solved as described in Ref. 6. The calculations used a supercell of edge 71 a.u. and the energy cut-off in the plane wave expansion of the den- sity was 8 Ryd. In all cases, a 64 ×64×64 grid was used. Previous tests6,7indicate that the cut-offs used give good convergence of bond lengths and binding energies. The fictitious mass associated with the electron density coef- ficients ranged between 1.0 ×108and 3.3 ×108a.u., and the equations of motion were integrated using the Verlet algorithm36for both electrons and ions with a time step ranging from ∆t = 0.73 ×10−15sec. for the simulations performed at the lowest temperatures, to ∆t = 0.34 × 10−15sec. for those at the highest ones. These choices resulted in a conservation of the total energy better than 0.1 %. Several molecular dynamics simulation runs at differ- ent constant energies were performed in order to obtain the caloric curve for each cluster. The initial positions of the atoms for the first run were taken by slightly de- forming the equilibrium low temperature geometry of the cluster. The final configuration of each run served as the starting geometry for the next run at a different energy. The initial velocities for every new run were obtained by scaling the final velocities of the preceding run. The total simulation times varied between 8 and 18 ps for each run at constant energy. A number of indicators to locate the melting-like tran- sition were employed. Namely, the specific heat defined by37 Cv= [N−N(1−2 3N−6)< E kin>t< E−1 kin>t]−1, (4) 2where N is the number of atoms and <>tindicates the average along a trajectory; the time evolution of the dis- tance between each atom and the center of mass of the cluster ri(t) =|/vectorRi(t)−/vectorRcm(t)|; (5) the average over a whole dynamical trajectory of the ra- dial atomic distribution function g(r), defined by dNat=g(r)dr (6) where dNat(r) is the number of atoms at distances from the center of mass between r and r + dr; and finally, the diffusion coefficient D=1 6d dt(< r2(t)>), (7) which is obtained from the long time behavior of the mean square displacement < r2(t)>= 1 Nnt/summationtextnt j=1/summationtextN i=1[/vectorRi(t0j+t)−/vectorRi(t0j)]2, where ntis the number of time origins, t0j, considered along a trajectory. III. RESULTS The most stable disordered structures of Na 92and Na142that we have found with the simulated annealing technique are shown in Fig. 1, together with the relaxed icosahedral isomers obtained as explained in our previous work.7The dynamical annealing runs17were started from high-temperature liquid isomers thermalized during 30 ps at 600 K. The cooling strategy was to reduce the inter- nal cluster temperature by a factor of 0.9999 of its actual value each twelve atomic time steps. With the chosen time step of 0.34 ×10−15sec. the temperature reduction is applied each four femtoseconds. A first important dif- ference between the icosahedral and disordered isomers is that the former ones have a smoother surface. Besides that, no apparent spatial symmetry is observed in the disordered isomers. In Fig. 2 we show the short-time av- erages (sta) of the distances between each atom and the center of mass of the cluster for both isomers of Na 142, obtained from an OFMD run at a low temperature. The values of < ri(t)>staare almost independent of time. The clusters are solid, the atoms merely vibrating around their equilibrium positions. Curve crossings are due to oscillatory motion and slight structural relaxations rath er than diffusive motion. The difference between Figs. 2a and 2b is due to structure. For the icosahedral isomer in Fig. 2a one can distinguish quasidegenerate groups which are characteristic of the symmetry: one line near the center of mass of the cluster identifies the central atom, whose position does not exactly coincide with the center of mass because of the location of the five sur- face vacancies (147 atoms are needed to form a complete three-shell icosahedron); 12 lines correspond to the first icosahedral shell; another 42 complete the second shell,within which we can distinguish the 12 vertex atoms from the rest because their distances to the center of mass are slightly larger; finally, 82 lines describe the external she ll, where again we can distinguish the 7 vertex atoms from the rest. In contrast, the lines for the disordered isomer in Fig. 2b are quite dispersed. Nevertheless, there is a narrow interval where the ionic density is very low, that serves to define separate surface and inner atomic shells. The case of Na 92(not shown) is similar, but in that case the structure is more uniformously amorphous, and there is no way to distinguish between surface and inner shells. We will see below that this small difference is very im- portant. Soler at al.26,27have compared the structures of icosahedral and amorphous gold clusters, with similar results: while the atoms in the icosahedral isomers are clearly distributed in atomic shells with different radial distances to the center of mass of the cluster, in the case of amorphous clusters there are “atomic transfers” be- tween shells that blur the atomic shell structure. In the case of gold clusters, the amorphous isomers turn out to be the minimum energy structures for a number of sizes.26In the case of Na 92and Na 142, the icosahedral isomers are more stable than the lowest energy disor- dered isomers found (0.017 eV/atom and 0.020 eV/atom for Na 92and Na 142respectively).7 For each cluster we have calculated the internal tem- perature, defined as the average of the ionic kinetic energy,37as a function of the total energy– the so-called caloric curve. A thermal phase transition is indicated in the caloric curve by a change of slope, the slope being the specific heat; the height of the step gives an estimate of the latent heat of fusion. However, melting processes are more easily recognized as peaks in the specific heat as a function of temperature, that has been calculated di- rectly from eq. (4). The fact that the specific heat peaks occur at the same temperatures as the slope changes of the caloric curve (see curves below) gives us confidence on the convergence of our results, as those two quantities have been obtained in different ways. The specific heat curves for Na 142(fig. 3) display two main peaks, suggestive of a two-step melting process. For the disordered cluster the two peaks are well separated in temperature, Tdis s≈130 K and Tdis m≈270 K, whereas they are much closer together for the icosahedral cluster, Tico s≈240 K and Tico m≈270 K, so close that only one slope change in the caloric curve can be distinguished in this case. The results suggest that the melting transi- tion starts at a temperature T sand finishes at T mwith the difference in the melting of the two isomers being the smaller T svalue of the disordered isomer. In our previous work7we showed that for the icosahedral cluster those two steps are due to surface melting and homogeneous melting, respectively. Here we show that a similar expla- nation is valid for the disordered Na 142isomer. At T=160 K, a temperature between Tdis sand Tdis m, the structure of the disordered cluster is more fluid than at low temper- ature (fig. 2). Fig. 4 indicates that the spherical atomic shells have separately melted, atoms undergoing diffu- 3sive motions mainly across a given shell, as seen in the bold lines, without an appreciable intershell diffusion (al - though some occasional intershell displacement has been observed). The larger spread of the upper bold line in- dicates that diffusion is appreciably faster in the surface shell. Thus the transition at 130 K can be identified with intrashell melting. Why it occurs at a rather low tem- perature is associated with the large spread in the radial distances of the atoms in each shell. The atomic shells are structurally disordered at low temperature, although kinetically frozen, like in a typical glass, so inducing diff u- sion in the shells of that cluster is rather easy and occurs at moderate temperatures. The surface melting stage does not develop in the icosahedral isomer until a tem- perature of Tico s≈240 K is reached. At this temperature, the time evolution of the surface atomic distances to the cluster center becomes very similar to those of the dis- ordered Na 142isomer at 160 K.7Inducing diffusion in the surface of the icosahedral isomer requires a higher temperature because of the higher structural order of its surface. Once the surface of both isomers has melted, ho- mogeneous melting occur at the same temperature, ≈270 K, in very good agreement with the experimental value of 280 K.9From that temperature on, the liquid phase is completely established (all atoms can diffuse across the whole cluster volume)7and differences between both iso- mers have no sense anymore. The thermal behavior of both isomers is not so differ- ent. The radial atomic density distribution of the disor- dered isomer at 160 K (Fig. 5) shows a smoothed shape with respect to that found at low T, but a distribution of the atoms in separate surface and inner atomic shells can be clearly distinguished. In fact, the intermediate temperature distribution is similar to that found for the icosahedral isomer in the same temperature region,7as the atomic shells are equally distinguished. The small gap in the ionic density (Figs. 2 and 5) of the disordered isomer at low temperature drives the cluster towards a well defined shell structure upon heating. We conclude that, despite the high orientational disorder in both sur- face and inner shells, the cluster can not be considered completely amorphous, as Fig. 5 at intermediate tem- perature shows some radial atomic ordering. There are still more similarities. The solidlike phase of the icosahe - dral isomer disappears as soon as a temperature of 130 K is reached, even though no peak in the specific heat is detected: there are isomerization transitions between different permutational isomers which preserve the icosa- hedral structure.7These isomerizations involve the dis- placement of the five surface vacancies across the outer shell. Thus, both isomers leave the solidlike phase at ≈ 130 K, the only difference being that one has direct access to the intrashell melting stage while the other enters first an isomerization regime. Calvo and Spiegelmann5have related the appareance of specific heat peaks to sudden openings of the available phase space. In the isomer- ization regime the icosahedral cluster has access just to a limited number of symmetry-equivalent isomers, whilethe phase structure of the disordered cluster opens sud- denly to include a very large number of isomers, as all the possible position interchanges between two atoms of a given shell are allowed. Thus, a specific heat peak ap- pears at T ≈130 K for the disordered isomer, but not for the icosahedral isomer. Any atomic shell distribution in the time average of g(r) disappears completely when ho- mogeneous melting occur (Fig. 5). The results for Na 92are shown in fig. 6. Two-step melting is again observed in the icosahedral isomer, with a small prepeak in the specific heat at Tico s≈130 K and a large peak, corresponding to homogeneous melt- ing, at Tico m≈240 K. In this case Tico sand Tico mare well separated. Tico sis in the range where the isomerization processes in icosahedral Na 142set in and the intrashell melting stage in disordered Na 142develops. The larger number of vacancies in the surface shell of icosahedral Na92, as compared to icosahedral Na 142, allows for true surface diffusion and these processes give rise to a dis- tinct peak in the specific heat.7The disordered isomer melts gradually over a wide temperature interval, and no prominent specific heat peaks nor important slope changes in the caloric curve are detected. Ercolessi et al.38have also found a melting process without a latent heat of fusion for amorphous gold clusters with less than ∼90 atoms. In Fig. 7 we show the radial ionic density distribution of disordered Na 92at several representative temperatures. At a temperature as low as 70 K there is no discernible atomic shell structure. The g(r) function for a higher temperature where the surface of the icosa- hedral isomer has already melted is not very different. At a temperature where the icosahedral isomer is liquid the only appreciable change in g(r) is due to the thermal ex- pansion of the cluster. The structure of cold disordered Na92is both radially and orientationally disordered. The structure is kinetically frozen, but there seems to be no barriers impeding the exploration of the liquid part of the phase space. In fact, the cluster is already in that region at low temperature, as Fig. 7 shows. This is seen most clearly in the evolution of the diffusion behavior with temperature. In Fig. 8 we show the temperature varia- tion of the square root of the diffusion coefficient. While the two steps in the melting of the icosahedral isomer are clearly detected as slope changes at the corresponding temperatures, the value of√ Dfor the disordered isomer increases with temperature in a smooth way, without any abrupt change. Thus, the opening of the available phase space proceeds in a gradual way and specific heat peaks are not detected. We have found a very different thermal behavior for two clusters that were classified in principle as disor- dered. Although just two examples are not enough to draw general conclusions, we believe that the thermal be- havior typical of amorphouslike sodium clusters is that found for Na 92, and that what is lacking is a clear defi- nition of what an amorphous cluster is. In line with the discussion of “atomic transfers” between shells advanced by Soler et al,27we propose that a large orientational 4disorder is not enough for a cluster to be classified as amorphouslike. Only when those atomic transfers are maximal, in such a way that no local regions with low atomic density exist, the cluster can be considered com- pletely amorphous. The existence of those regions, how- ever small they may be (as is the case of Na 142), promote the creation of appreciable free energy barriers in the po- tential energy surface, so sudden access to a substantial region of the available phase space is expected above a certain temperature, and peaks will appear in the tem- perature evolution of the specific heat. On the contrary, the absence of such low atomic density regions facilitates the diffusion of the atoms across the whole cluster volume right from the start of the heating process. As the liq- uidlike phase is established precisely when all the atoms in the cluster can diffuse across the cluster volume, we expect that no appreciable free energy barriers will be found in these cases, and no specific heat peaks will be detected. A few comments regarding the quality of the simu- lations and of the annealing runs are perhaps in order here. The orbital-free representation of the atomic in- teractions is much more efficient than the more accurate KS treatments, but is still substantially more expensive computationally than a simulation using phenomenolog- ical many-body potentials. Such potentials contain a number of parameters that are usually chosen by fitting some bulk and/or molecular properties. In contrast our model is free of external parameters, although there are approximations in the kinetic and exchange-correlation functionals. The orbital-free scheme accounts, albeit ap- proximately, for the effects of the detailed electronic dis- tribution on the total energy and the forces on the ions. We feel that this is particularly important in metallic clusters for which a large proportion of atoms are on the surface and experience a very different electronic envi- ronment than an atom in the interior. Furthermore, the adjustment of the electronic structure and consequently the energy and forces to rearrangements of the ions is also taken into account. But the price to be paid for the more accurate description of the interactions is a less complete statistical sampling of the phase space. The simulation times are substantially shorter than those that can be achieved in phenomenological simulations. The cooling rate employed in the annealing runs is also faster than those that can be achieved by using empirical potentials. Nevertheless, we expect that the locations of the several transitions are reliable, because all the indicators we hav e used, both thermal and structural ones, are in essential agreement on the temperature at which the transitions start. On the other hand, the disordered isomers found in different annealing runs did not show substantial struc- tural or energetic differences with respect to those studied here.IV. SUMMARY The melting-like transition in disordered Na 142and Na92has been investigated by applying an orbital-free, density-functional molecular dynamics method. The computational effort which is required is modest in com- parison with the traditional Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics technique based on Kohn-Sham orbitals, that would be very costly for clusters of this size. This saving allows the study of large clusters. A disordered isomer of Na 142melts in two steps as evidenced by the thermal indicators. The transition at Tdis s≈130 K is best described as intrashell melt- ing. This is followed at Tdis m≈270 K by homogeneous melting. Melting is found to depend on the starting low-temperature isomer. Specifically, for an icosahedral Na142isomer, the analysis of thermal, macroscopic prop- erties places those two stages much closer in temperature, 240 K and 270 K respectively.7Nevertheless, isomeriza- tion transitions are observed in the icosahedral isomer at a temperature as low as Tdis s≈130 K. These isomer- izations involve the motion of the five atomic vacancies in the cluster surface, preserve the icosahedral structure and do not give rise to any pronounced feature in the caloric curve. In the disordered isomer there is not a separate isomerization regime (something rather evident because there is not an underlying ordered structure in each shell), but there is a melting-in-steps process, due to the distribution of the atoms in different shells. Thus, the melting of both isomers is not as different as suggested by the thermal indicators. An icosahedral isomer of Na 92 melts also in a similar way: there is a minor peak in C vat Tico s≈130K that indicates surface melting, and a main, homogeneous melting peak at Tico m≈240 K. The lower value of Tico s, as compared to Na 142, is due to the larger number of surface vacancies, and the melting-in-step pro- cess is due to the atomic shell structure. The melting of disordered Na 92proceeds instead gradually, and spreads over a very wide temperature interval. The thermal indi- cators as the caloric curve or the specific heat do not show any indications of an abrupt transition, which suggests that the phase space available to the cluster does not in- creases suddenly at any given temperature. The square root of the diffusion coefficient increases with tempera- ture in a smooth way, in contrast to the step diffusive behavior of icosahedral Na 92. It has been suggested that the absence of any abrupt transition is closely related to the absence of any shell structure in the radial atomic density distribution, which should be considered a neces- sary condition for a cluster to be considered completely amorphous. In this, sense, only the disordered isomer of Na 92can be considered rigorously amorphous, while the disordered Na 142isomer should be considered just partially amorphous. In summary, we have found a number of structural properties that have an important effect on the melting properties of sodium clusters. A melting in steps pro- 5cess is to be expected in almost all clusters where a clear distribution of the atoms in radial shells exists, as is the case of both isomers of Na 142and of the icosahedral iso- mer of Na 92. In those cases, intrashell diffusive motion starts at a temperature T intra, lower than the temper- ature T interat which intershell diffusive motion begins to be important. The difference T inter-Tintrais small if the orientational order of the shells is large (for example, icosahedral order) and the number of vacancies in each shell is small: this occurs for icosahedral Na 142, with just five surface vacancies; A limit case is icosahedral Na 55. With two complete atomic shells, intrashell motions are as difficult as intershell motions and the two transitions merge into one.7When one shell contains a large number of vacancies, the two temperatures are well separated no matter how high the orientational order is: this is exem- plified by the case of icosahedral Na 92. Also, if the shells have a high orientational disorder, the two transitions are well separated in temperature no matter how close we are from an icosahedral shell closing: an example is the disordered Na 142isomer. Finally, a gradual melting process without any abrupt transition is to be expected for all those clusters which have both orientational and radial disorder, that is for amorphouslike clusters: this i s the case of amorphous Na 92. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This work has been supported by DGES (Grant PB98-0368) and Junta de Castilla y Le´ on (VA70/99). The author acknowledges useful discussions with J. M. L´ opez, J. A. Alonso, and M. J. Stott. Captions of Figures. Figure 1 Structures of the low temperature (a) amor- phous Na 142, (b) icosahedral Na 142, (c) amorphous Na 92 and (d) icosahedral Na 92isomers. Figure 2 Short-time averaged distances < ri(t)>sta between each atom and the center of mass in Na 142, as functions of time for (a) the icosahedral isomer at T= 30 K and (b) the amorphous isomer at T= 47 K. Figure 3 Caloric and specific heat curves of Na 142, taking the internal cluster temperature as the indepen- dent variable. The deviation around the mean tempera- ture is smaller than the size of the circles. Figure 4 Short-time averaged distances < ri(t)>sta between each atom and the center of mass in amorphous Na142as functions of time at T= 160 K. The bold lines follow the evolution of a particular atom in the surface shell and another in the outermost core shell. Figure 5 Time averaged radial atomic density distri- bution of the amorphous isomer of Na 142, at some repre- sentative temperatures. Figure 6 Caloric and specific heat curves of Na 92, tak- ing the internal cluster temperature as the independent variable. The deviation around the mean temperature is smaller than the size of the circles.Figure 7 Time averaged radial atomic density distri- bution of the amorphous isomer of Na 92, at some repre- sentative temperatures. Figure 8 Square root of the diffusion coefficient as a function of temperature for the icosahedral and amor- phous isomers of Na 92. 1A. Bulgac and D. Kusnezov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1335 (1992); Phys. Rev. B 45, 1988 (1992); N. Ju and A. Bulgac, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2721 (1993); M. Fosmire and A. Bulgac, ibid.52, 17509 (1995); J. M. Thompson and A. Bulgac, ibid.40, 462 (1997); L. J. Lewis, P. Jensen, and J. L. Bar- rat,ibid.56, 2248 (1997); S. K. Nayak, S. N. Khanna, B. K. Rao, and P. Jena, J. Phys: Condens. Matter 10, 10853 (1998). F. Calvo and P. Labastie, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 2051 (1998); J. P. K. Doye and D. J. Wales, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2292 (1999); J. Chem. Phys. 111, 11070 (1999). 2P. Blaise, S. A. Blundell, and C. Guet, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15856 (1997). 3A. Rytk¨ onen, H. H¨ akkinen, and M. Manninen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3940 (1998). 4C. L. Cleveland, W. D. Luedtke, and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2036 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 60, 5065 (1999). 5F. Calvo and F. Spiegelmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2270 (1999); J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2888 (2000). 6A. Aguado, J. M. L´ opez, J. A. Alonso, and M. J. Stott, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6026 (1999); 7J. Phys. Chem. B, submitted (preprint available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/9911042). 8T. P. Martin, Phys. Rep. 273, 199 (1996). 9M. Schmidt, R. Kusche, W. Kronm¨ uller, B. von Is- sendorff, and H. Haberland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 99 (1997); M. Schmidt, R. Kusche, B. von Issendorff, and H. Haber- land, Nature 393, 238 (1998); R. Kusche, Th. Hippler, M. Schmidt, B. von Issendorff, and H. Haberland, Eur. Phys. J. D9, 1 (1999). 10M. Schmidt, C. Ellert, W. Kronm¨ uller, and H. Haberland, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10970 (1999). 11H. Haberland, in “ Metal Clusters ”, ed. W. Ekardt (John Wiley & Sons, 1999), p. 181. 12J. Jellinek, T. L. Beck, and R. S. Berry, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2783 (1986). 13Z. B. G¨ uvenc and J. Jellinek, Z. Phys. D 26, 304 (1993). 14V. K. W. Cheng, J. P. Rose, and R. S. Berry, Surf. Rev. Lett. 3, 347 (1996). 15H. P. Cheng and R. S. Berry, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7969 (1991); R. S. Berry, in Clusters of Atoms and Molecules , edited by H. Haberland (Springer, Berlin, 1994), pp. 187–204. 16M. Pearson, E. Smargiassi, and P. A. Madden, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 3221 (1993). 17R. Car and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2471 (1985); M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Allan, T. A. Arias, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1045 (1992). 18P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, 864B (1964). 19W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, 1133A (1965). 620E. Smargiassi and P. A. Madden, Phys. Rev. B 49, 5220 (1994); M. Foley, E. Smargiassi, and P. A. Madden, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 5231 (1994); E. Smargiassi and P. A. Madden, Phys. Rev. B 51, 117 (1995); ibid.51, 129 (1995); M. Foley and P. A. Madden, ibid.53, 10589 (1996); B. J. Jesson, M. Foley, and P. A. Madden, ibid.55, 4941 (1997); J. A. Anta, B. J. Jesson, and P. A. Madden, ibid.58, 6124 (1998). 21N. Govind, Y. A. Wang, and E. A. Carter, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 7677 (1999). 22V. Shah, D. Nehete, and D. G. Kanhere, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter 6, 10773 (1994); D. Nehete, V. Shah, and D. G. Kanhere, Phys. Rev. B 53, 2126 (1996); V. Shah and D. G. Kanhere, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, L253 (1996); V. Shah, D. G. Kanhere, C. Majumber, and G. P. Das, ibid.9, 2165 (1997); A. Vichare and D. G. Kanhere, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 3309 (1998); A. Vichare and D. G. Kanhere, Eur. Phys. J. D 4, 89 (1998); A. Dhavale, V. Shah, and D. G. Kanhere, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4522 (1998). 23N. Govind, J. L. Mozos, and H. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 51, 7101 (1995); Y. A. Wang, N. Govind, and E. A. Carter, ibid.58, 13465 (1998). 24V. Bonaci´ c-Kouteck´ y, J. Jellinek, M. Wiechert, and P. Fan - tucci, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 6321 (1997); D. Reichardt, V. Bonaci´ c-Kouteck´ y, P. Fantucci, and J. Jellinek, Chem. Phys. Lett. 279, 129 (1997). 25S. K¨ ummel, P. -G. Reinhard, and M. Brack, Eur. Phys. J. D 9, 149 (1999); S. K¨ ummel, M. Brack, and P. -G. Reinhard, unpublished results. 26I. L. Garz´ on, K. Michaelian, M. R. Beltr´ an, A. Posada- Amarillas, P. Ordej´ on, E. Artacho, D. S´ anchez-Portal, an d J. M. Soler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1600 (1998). 27J. M. Soler, M. R. Beltr´ an, K. Michaelian, I. L. Garz´ on, P. Ordej´ on, D. S´ anchez-Portal, and E. Artacho, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5771 (2000). 28J. P. K. Doye and D. J. Wales, J. Phys. B 29, 4859 (1996). 29Theory of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Editors S. Lundqvist and N. H. March. Plenum Press, New York (1983). 30W. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 34, 4575 (1986). 31J. P. Perdew, Phys. Lett. A 165, 79 (1992). 32J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981). 33D. Ceperley and B. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980). 34C. Fiolhais, J. P. Perdew, S. Q. Armster, J. M. McLaren, and H. Brajczewska, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14001 (1995); ibid. 53, 13193 (1996). 35F. Nogueira, C. Fiolhais, J. He, J. P. Perdew, and A. Rubio, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 287 (1996). 36L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. 159, 98 (1967); W. C. Swope and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 637 (1982). 37S. Sugano, Microcluster Physics , Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1991). 38F. Ercolessi, W. Andreoni, and E. Tosatti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 911 (1991). 7[ 8910110 2000 4000 6000 time (fs)01020<ri>sta (a.u.) 120 5000 10000 time (fs)0510152025<ri>sta (a.u.) 130 100 200 300 400 500 T (K)2468Specific Heat (kB)−33.2−33.0−32.8−32.6−32.4−32.2Total Energy (Hartree) 140 2000 4000 6000 8000 time (fs)01020<ri>sta (a.u.) 150 10 20 30 r (bohr)0.02.04.06.0<Number of Atoms>t47 K 160 K 361 K 1650 150 250 350 T (K)3.04.05.06.07.0Specific Heat (kB)−21.4−21.3−21.2−21.1−21.0−20.9Total Energy (Hartree) 170 10 20 r (bohr)0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5<Number of Atoms>78 K 165 K 300 K 180 100 200 300 T (K)0.0000.0100.0200.0300.0400.050D1/2(bohr/fs1/2)icosahedron Amorphous 19

arXiv:physics/0005046v1 [physics.comp-ph] 18 May 2000Resampling Method For Unsupervised Estimation Of Cluster Validity Erel Levine and Eytan Domany Department of Physics of Complex Systems, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel February 2, 2008 Abstract We introduce a method for validation of results obtained by c lustering analysis of data. The method is based on resampling the available data. A figure of m erit that measures the stability of clustering solutions against resampling is introduced. Cl usters which are stable against resampling give rise to local maxima of this figure of merit. This is prese nted first for a one-dimensional data set, for which an analytic approximation for the figure of merit is derived and compared with numerical measurements. Next, the applicability of the method is demo nstrated for higher dimensional data, including gene microarray expression data. 1 Introduction Cluster analysis is an important tool to investigate and int erpret data. Clustering techniques are the main tool used for exploratory data analysis, namely when on e is dealing with data about whose internal structure little or no prior information is available. Clus ter algorithms are expected to produce partitions that reflect the internal structure of the data and identify “ natural” classes and hierarchies present in it. Throughout the years a wide variety of clustering algorithm s have been proposed. Some algorithms have their origins in graph theory, whereas others are based on statistical pattern recognition, self- organization methods and more. More recently, several algo rithms, which are rooted in statistical me- chanics, have been introduced. Comparing the relative merits of various methods is made diffi cult by the fact that when applied to the same data set, different clustering algorithms often lead to markedly different results . In some cases such differences are expected, since different algorithms ma ke different (explicit or implicit) assumptions about the structure of the data. If the particular set that is being studied consists, for example, of several clouds of data point, with each cloud spherically distribut ed about its center, methods that assume such structure (e.g. k-means), will work well. On the other hand, if the data consist of a single non-spherical cluster, the same algorithms will fare miserably, breaking it up into a hierarchy of partitions. Since for the cases of interest one does not know which assumptions are satisfied by the data, a researcher may run into severe difficulties in interpretation of his results; by preferring one algorithm’s clusters over those of another, he may re-introduce his biases about the underly ing structure - precisely those biases, which one hoped to eliminate by employing clustering techniques. In addition, the differences in the sensitivity of different algorithms to noise, which inherently exists in the data, also yield a major contribution to the difference between their results. The ambiguity is made even more severe by the fact that even wh en one sticks exclusively to one’s favorite algorithm, the results may depend strongly on the v alues assigned to various parameters of the particular algorithm. For example, if there is a parameter w hich controls the resolution at which the data are viewed, the algorithm produces a hierarchy of clusters ( a dendrogram) as a function of this parameter. One then has to decide which level of the dendrogram reflects b est the “natural” classes present in the data? Needless to say, one wishes to answer these questions in an un supervised manner, i.e. making use of nothing more than the available data itself. Various meth ods and indicators, that come under the name “cluster validation”, attempt to evaluate the results of cluster analysis in this manner (Jain and Dubes, 1988). Numerous studies suggest direct and indirect indices for evaluation of hard clustering (Jain and Dubes, 1988; Bock, 1985), probabilistic clusteri ng (Duda and Hart, 1973), and fuzzy cluster- ing (Windham, 1982; Pal and Bezdek, 1995) results. Hard clus tering indices are often based on some geometrical motivation to estimate how compact and well sep arated the clusters are (e.g. Dunn’s index 1−0.5 0 0.5−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.200.20.40.60.8/(a/) −0.5 0 0.5−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.200.20.40.60.8/(b/) Figure 1: Two samples, drawn from an 8-shaped uniform distri bution. Sample (a) is somewhat non- typical. (Dunn, 1974) and its generalizations (Bezdek and Pal, 1995) ); others are statistically motivated (e.g. comparing the within cluster scattering with the between-c luster separation (Davies and Bouldin, 1979)). Probabilistic and fuzzy indices are not considered here. In dices proposed for these methods are based on likelihood-ratio tests (Duda and Hart, 1973), informati on-based criteria (Cutler and Windham, 1994) and more. Another approach to cluster validity includes some variant of cross-validation (Fukunaga, 1990). Such methods were introduced both in the context of hard clus tering (Jain and Moreau, 1986) and fuzzy clustering (Smyth, 1996). The approach presented here fall s into this category. In this paper we present a method to help select which cluster ing result is more reliable. The method can be used to compare different algorithms, but it is most sui table to identify, within the same algorithm, those partitions that can be attributed to the presence of no ise. In these cases a slight modification of the noise may alter the cluster structure significantly. Our met hod controls and alters the noise by means of resampling the original dataset. In order to illustrate the problem we wish to address and its p roposed solution, consider the following example. Say a scientist is investigating mice, and comes to suspect that there are several types of them. She therefore measures two features of the mice (such as weig ht and shade), looks for clusters in this two-dimensional data set, and indeed finds two clusters. She can therefore conclude that there are two types of mice in her lab. Or can she? Imagine that the data collected by the scientist can be repre sented by the points on figure 1 (a). This data set was in fact taken from a shaped uniform distribu tion (with a relatively narrow “neck” at the middle). Hence no partition really exists in the underly ing structure of the data and, unless one makes explicit assumptions about the shape of the data cloud s, one should identify a single cluster. The particular cluster algorithm used breaks, however, the dat a into two clusters along the horizontal gap seen in figure 1 (a). This gap happens to be the result of fluctua tions in the data, or noise in the sampling (or measurement) process. More typical data sets, such as th at of figure 1 (b), do not have such gaps and are not broken into two clusters by the algorithm. If more than a single sample had been available, it would have been safe to assume that this particular gap would not have had appeared in most samples. The partitio n into two clusters would, in that case, be easily identified as unreliable. In most cases, however, onl y a single sample is available, and resampling techniques are needed in order to generate several ones. In this paper we propose a cluster validation method which is based on resampling (Good, 1999; Efron and Tibshirani, 1993): subsets of the data under investigat ion are constructed randomly, and the cluster algorithm is applied to each subset. The resampling scheme i s introduced in Sec. 2, and a figure of merit is proposed to identify the stable clustering solutions, wh ich are less likely to be the results of noise or fluctuations. The proposed procedure is tested in Sec. 3 on a o ne-dimensional data set, for which an analytical expression for the figure of merit is derived and c ompared with the corresponding numerical results. In Sec. 4 we demonstrate the applicability of our me thod to two artificial data sets (in d= 2 dimensions) and to real (very high dimensional) DNA microar ray data. 22 The Resampling Scheme Let us denote the number of data points in the set to be studied byN. Typically, application of any cluster algorithm necessitates choosing specific values fo r some parameters. The results yielded by the clustering algorithm may depend strongly on this choice. Fo r example, some algorithms ( e.g.thec-shell fuzzy-clustering (Bezdek, 1981) and the iso-data algorith m (Cover and Thomas, 1991)) take the expected number of clusters as part of their input. Other algorithms ( e.g.Valley-Seeking (Fukunaga, 1990)) have the number of neighbors of each point as an external paramete r. In particular, many algorithms have a parameter that contro ls the resolution at which clusters are identified. In agglomerative clustering methods, for examp le, this parameter defines the level of the resulting dendrogram at which the clustering solution is id entified (Jain and Dubes, 1988). For the K-nearest-neighbor algorithm (Fukunaga, 1990) a change in the number of neighbors of each point, K, controls the resolution. For Deterministic Annealing and the Superparamagnetic Clustering (SPC) algorithm this role is played by the temperature T . As this control parameter is varied, the data-points get ass igned to different clusters, giving rise to ahierarchy . At the lowest resolution all Npoints belong to one cluster, whereas at the other extreme one has Nclusters, of a single point in each. As the resolution parame ter varies, clusters of data points break into sub-clusters which break further at a higher leve l. Sometimes the aim is to generate precisely such a dendrogram. In other cases one would like to produce a s ingle partitioning of the data, which captures a particular important aspect. In such a case we wis h to identify that value of the resolution control parameter, at which the most reliable, natural clus ters appear. In these situations the resolution parameter plays the role of one (probably the most important ) member of the family of parameters of the algorithm that needs to be fixed. Let us denote the full set of parameters of our algorithm by V. Any particular clustering solution can be presented in the f orm of an N×Ncluster connectivity matrix Tij, defined by Tij=/braceleftbigg1 points iandjbelong to the same cluster 0 otherwise(1) In order to validate this solution, we construct an ensemble ofmsuch matrices, and make comparisons among them. This ensemble is created by constructing mresamples of the original data set. A resample is obtained by selecting at random a subset of size fNof the data points. We call 0 ≤f≤1 thedilution factor . We apply to every one of these subsets the same clustering pro cedure, that was used on the full dataset, using the same set of parameters V. This way we obtain for each resample µ, µ = 1, ...m, its own clustering results, summarized by the fN×fNmatrix T(µ). We define a figure of merit M(V) for the clustering procedure (and for the choice of paramet ers) that we used. The figure of merit is based on comparing the conn ectivity matrices of the resamples, T(µ)(µ= 1. . .m), with the original matrix T: M(V) =≪δTij,T(µ) ij≫m, (2) The averaging implied by the notation ≪ · ≫ mis twofold. First, for each resample µwe average over all those pairs of points ijwhich were neighbors1in the original sample, and have both survived the resampling. Second, this average value is averaged over all themdifferent resamples. Clearly, 0 ≤ M ≤ 1, withM= 1 for perfect score. The figure of merit Mmeasures the extent to which the clustering assignments obt ained from the resamples agrees with that of the full sample. An important a ssumption we have made implicitly in this procedure is that the algorithm‘s parameters are “intensiv e”,i.e.their effect on the quality of the result is independent of the size of the data set. We can generalize o ur procedure in several ways to cases when this assumption does not hold2(Levine, 2000). After calculating M(V), we have to decide whether we accept the clustering result, obtained using a particular value of the clustering parameters, or not. For v ery low and very high values of Mthe decision may be easy, but for mid-range values we may need some additio nal information to guide our decision. In such a case, the best way to proceed is to change the values of t he clustering parameters, and go through the whole process once again. Having done so for some set parameter choices V, we study the way M(V) varies as a function of V. Optimal sets of parameters V∗are identified by locating the maxima of this function. It sho uld be noted, 1For various definition of neighbors see (Fukunaga, 1990) 2For example, we can define our figure of merit on the basis of pai rwise comparisons of our resamples, and find an optimal set of parameters V∗ 1in the way explained below. Next, we look for parameters V∗ 2for which clustering of the full sample yields closest results to those obtained for the resa mples (clustered at V∗ 1). 3however, that some of these maxima are trivial and should not be used. Examples that demonstrate this point are presented in the next section. Our procedure can be summarized in the following algorithmi c form: Step 0. Choose values for the parameters Vof the clustering algorithm. Step 1. Perform clustering analysis of the full data set. Step 2. Construct msub sets of the data set, by randomly selecting fNof the Noriginal data-points. Step 3. Perform clustering analysis for each sub set. Step 4. Based on the clustering results obtained in Steps 1 and3calculate M(V), as defined in eq. (2). Step 5. Vary the parameters Vand identify stable clusters as those for which a local maxim um of M is observed. 3 Analysis of a One Dimensional Model To demonstrate the procedure outlined above we consider a cl ustering problem, which is simple enough to allow an approximate analytical calculation of the figure of meritMand its dependence on a parameter that controls the resolution. Consider a one dimensional da ta set which consists of points xi, i−1, ..., N , selected from two identical but displaced uniform distribu tions, such as the one shown in Fig. 3. The distributions are characterized by the mean distance betwe en neighboring points, d= 1/λ, and the distance or gap between the two distributions, ∆. Distances between neighboring points within a cluster are distributed according to the Poisson distribution, P(s) =λe−λsds. (3) The results of a clustering algorithm that reflects the under lying distribution from which the data were selected should identify two clusters in this data set. Consider a simple nearest-neighbor clustering algorithm, which assigns two neighboring points to the same cluster if and only if the distance between the two is sma ller than a threshold a. Clearly, α=λa is the dimensionless parameter of the algorithm that contro ls the resolution of the clustering. For very small α << 1 no two points belong to the same cluster, and the number of cl usters equals N, the number of points; at the other extreme, α >> 1, all pairs of neighbors are assigned to the same cluster, an d hence all points reside in one cluster. Starting from α >> 1 and reducing it gradually, one generates a dendrogram. At an intermediate value of αwe may get any number of clusters between one and N. Hence, if we picked some particular value of αat which we obtained some clusters, we must face the dilemma of deciding whether these clusters are “natural”, o r are the result of the fluctuations (i.e. noise) present in the data. In other words, we would like to validate the clustering solution obtained for the full data set for a given value of α. We do this using the resampling scheme described above. A resample is generated by independently deciding for each d ata point whether it is kept in the resample (with probability f), or is discarded (with probability 1 −f). This procedure is repeated m times, yielding mresamples. All length scales of the original problem get res caled by the resampling procedure by a factor of 1 /f; the mean distance between neighboring points in the resamp led set is d′= 1/λf, and the distance between the two uniform distributions is ∆′= ∆/f. Clustering is therefore performed with a rescaled threshold a′=a/fon any resample; the resolution parameter keeps its origina l value, α′=a′/d′=α. We first wish to get an approximate analytical expression for the figure of merit M(α) described above. To do this we consider the gaps between data points, ra ther then the points themselves. Let us denote by bthe distance between the data point i(of the original sample) and its nearest left neighbor: b=xi−xi−1, with the two points on the same side of the gap ∆. We first assum e that this edge is notbroken by the clustering algorithm, b < a. Given a resample that includes point i, we define b′in the same fashion. The new, resampled left neighbor of iresides in the same cluster as iifb′< a′; the probability that this happens is given by (Levine, 2000) P1(β) =∞/summationdisplay m=1f2(1−f)m−1 (m−1)!γ(m, α/f −β). (4) 4where the dimensionless variable β=λbwas introduced. Here γ(n, z) is Euler’s incomplete Gamma function, γ(n, z) =/integraldisplayz 0e−ttn−1dt, (5) except that in our convention, we take γ(n, z < 0) =γ(n,0). Similarly, if points iandi−1 were notassigned to the same cluster in the original sample, then the probability that the same would happen in a resample is(Levi ne, 2000) P2(β) =∞/summationdisplay m=1f2(1−f)m−1 (m−1)!Γ(m, α/f −β), (6) where Γ( n, z) is the other incomplete Gamma function, Γ(n, z) =/integraldisplay∞ ze−ttn−1dt, (7) and we take Γ( n, z < 0) = Γ( n,0) = ( n−1)!, so Bm= 1 for α≤fβ. We now calculate the index Min an approximate manner, by averaging P1andP2over all edges. This calculation matches the definition (2) of Min spirit. For pairs residing within a true cluster, the averaging is done by integrating over all possible values of b; A(α) =/integraldisplayα 0e−βP1(β)dβ+/integraldisplay∞ αe−βP2(β)dβ . (8) For pairs which lie of different sides of the gap, we should onl y compare awith the size of the gap ∆ : Bδ(α) =/braceleftbigg P1(δ)α≥δ P2(δ)α < δ, (9) where the dimensionless variable δ=λ∆ was introduced. Clearly, in the one-dimensional example there are much fewe r edges of the second kind than of the first. This, however, is not the case for data in higher dimens ions, so we give equal weights to the two terms AandB3 M(α) =1 2[A(α) +Bδ(α)]. (10) We now plot Mas a function of the resolution parameter αfor both f= 1/2 and f= 2/3 (figure 2(a)), assuming the inter-cluster distance δ= 5. A clear peak can be observed in both curves at α≃2.5 andα≃3.3, respectively. Similarly, for δ= 10 clear peaks are identified at α≃5 and α≃7 (figure 2(b)). As we will see, these peaks correspond to the most stable clus tering solution, which indeed recovers the original clusters. The trivial solutions, of a single clust er (of all data points) and the opposite limit of Nsingle-point clusters, are also stable, and appear as the ma xima of M(α) atα << 1 and α >> 1, respectively. In order to test how good is our analytic approximate evaluat ion ofM, we clustered a one-dimensional data set of figure 3(a), and calculated the index Mas defined in eq. (2). The data set consists of N= 200 data points sampled from two uniform distribution of mean ne arest neighbor distance 1 /λ= 1 and shifted by ∆ = 10. The dendrogram obtained by varying αis shown in Fig. 3(c). It clearly exhibits two stable clusters; stability is indicated by the wide range of values ofαover which the two clusters “survive”. Next, we generated 100 resamples of size 130 ( i.e.f≈2/3), and applied the geometrical clustering procedure described above to each resample. By averaging over the different resamples the figure of merit Mwas calculated for different values of the dimensionless resolution parameter α, as shown in figure 3(b). The peak between α≈4 and α≈7, corresponding to the most stable, “correct” clustering sol ution, is clearly identified. The agreement between our approximate analytical curve of figure 2(b) for M(α) and the numerically obtained exact curve of figure 3(b) is excellent and most gratifying. 3The ratio between the two terms is of the order ( d−1)/d, where dis the dimensionality of the problem. For high dimensional problems, this ratio is close to 1. 50 2 4 6 8 100.50.60.70.80.91 αM f=1/2 f=2/3 /(a/) 0 5 10 150.50.60.70.80.91 αM f=1/2 f=2/3 /(b/) Figure 2: Mean behavior of Mas a function of the geometric threshold, according to equat ion (10), for two clusters. The function is evaluated for the inter-clust er distances (a) ∆ = 5 λand (b) ∆ = 10 λ, with dilution parameters f= 1/2 and f= 2/3. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5024681012 (a)0 2 4 6 8 10 120.50.60.70.80.91M α (b) 20 40 60 80100 120 140 160 180 200987654321 α Data Points (c) Figure 3: Resampling results for a one-dimensional data set . 200 points were chosen uniformly from two clusters, separated by ∆ λ= 10. Histogram of the data is given in (a). We performed 100 re samples of 130 points, ( i.e.f≈2/3) to calculate M. In (b) we plot Mas a function of the resolution parameter α. The peak between α≈4 and α≈7 corresponds to the correct two cluster solution, as can be s een from the dendrogram shown in (c). 6−5−4−3−2−1 012345−4−3−2−101234 Figure 4: The three-ring problem. 1400 points are sampled fr om a three a three-component distribution described in the text. 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.180100200300400500600700800900 TemperatureCluster sizeOuter ring Middle ring Inner ring Figure 5: Clustering solution of the three ring problem as a f unction of resolution parameter (the tem- perature). 4 Applications 4.1 Two Dimensional Toy Data The analysis of the previous section predicts a typical beha vior of Mas a function of the parameters that control resolution; in particular, it suggests that one can identify a stable, “natural” partition as the one obtained at a local maximum of the function M. This prediction was based on an approximate analytical treatment and backed up by numerical simulations of one-dim ensional data. Here we demonstrate that this behavior is also observed for a toy problem which consis ts of the two-dimensional data set shown in figure 4. The angular coordinates of the data points are selec ted from a uniform distribution, θ∼U[0,2π]. The radial coordinates are normal distributed, r∼N[R, σ] around three different radii R. The outer “ring” ( R= 4.0,σ= 0.2) consists of 800 points, and the inner “rings” ( R= 2.0,1.0,σ= 0.1) consists of 400 and 200 points, respectively. The algorithm we choose to work with is the super-paramagnetic clustering (SPC) algorithm, recently introduced by Blatt et al. (Blatt et al., 1996; Domany, 1999). This algorithm provides a hierarchical clustering solution. A single parameter T, called “temperature”, controls the resolution : higher te mper- atures corresponds to higher resolutions. Variation of Tgenerates a dendrogram. The outcome of the algorithm depends also on an additional parameter K, described below in subsection 4.3.1. The data of Fig. 4 were clustered with K= 20. The results of the clustering procedure are presented in Fig ure 5. A stable phase, in which the three rings are clearly identified appears at the temperature rang e 0.3≤T≤0.8. In order to identify the value of Tthat yields the “correct” solution, we generated and cluste red 20 different resamples from this toy data set, with a dilution fa ctor of f= 2/3. The resolution parameter (temperature) of each resample was rescaled so that the tran sition temperature at which the single large cluster breaks up agrees with the temperature of the same tra nsition in the original sample. The function M(T), plotted in figure 6, exhibits precisely the expected behav ior, with two trivial maxima and an additional one at T= 0.05. This value indeed corresponds to the “correct” solution , of three clusters. 700.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20.650.70.750.80.850.90.9511.05 TemperatureM Figure 6: Mas a function of the temperature for the three-ring problem. 00.020.040.060.080.10.120.140.160.60.650.70.750.80.850.90.9511.05 TemperatureM 0 50 100 150 2000.70.750.80.850.90.9511.05 Number of cluster mergesM Figure 7: Mas a function of the resolution parameter for the single-clu ster problem. Clustering is performed using the SPC algorithm (left) and the Average-Li nkage algorithm (right). 4.2 A Single Cluster – Dealing With Cluster Tendency A frequent problem of clustering methods is the so called ’cl uster tendency’; that is, the tendency of the algorithm to partition any data, even when no natural clu sters exist. In particular, agglomerative algorithms, which provide a hierarchy of clusters, always g enerate some hierarchy as a control parameter is varied. We expect this hierarchy to be very sensitive to no ise, and thus unstable against resampling. We tested this assumption for the data set of figure 1(a). The t est was performed using two clustering methods: the SPC algorithm mentioned above, and the Average-Linkage clustering algorithm. The latter is an agglomerative hierarchical method. It starts with Ndistinct clusters, one for each point, and forms the hierarchy by successively merging the closest pair of cl usters, and redefining the distance between all other clusters and the new one. This step is repeated N−1 times, until only a single element remains. The output of this hierarchical method is a dendrogram. For m ore details see (Jain and Dubes, 1988). We performed our resampling scheme with m= 20 resamples and dilution factor of f= 2/3, for different levels of resolution. The results are shown in figur e 7. The only stable solutions identified by both algorithms are the trivial ones, of either a single clus ter or Nclusters. In this case, obviously, the single cluster solution is also the natural one. 4.3 Clustering DNA Microarray Data We turn now to apply our procedure to real-life data. We prese nt here validation of cluster analysis performed for DNA Microarray Data. Gene-array technology provides a broad picture of the state of a cell by monitoring the expression levels of thousands of genes simultaneously. In a typical ex periment simultaneous expression levels of thousands of genes are viewed over a few tens of cell cultures at different conditions. For details see (Chee et al., 1996; Brown and Botstein, 1999). The experiment whose analysis is presented here is on colon c ancer tissues(Alon et al., 1999). Expres- sion levels of ng= 2000 genes were measured for nt= 62 different tissues, out of which 40 were tumor tissues and 22 were normal ones. Clustering analysis of such data has two aims: (a) Searching for groups of tissues with similar gene expres sion profiles. Such groups may correspond to normal vs tumor tissues. For this analysis the nttissues are considered as the data points, embedded in an ngdimensional space. 80 5 10 15 20 25 300.50.550.60.650.70.750.80.850.90.951 KM Figure 8: Figure of merit Mas a function of Kfor the colon tissue data. (b) Searching for groups of genes with correlated behavior. For this analysis we view the genes as the data points, embedded in an ntdimensional space and we hope to find groups of genes that are part of the same biological mechanism. Following Alon et al. , we normalize each data point (in both cases) such that the st andard deviation of its components is one and its mean vanishes. This way the Eucl idean distance between two data points is trivially related to the Pearson correlation between the two. 4.3.1 Clustering tissues The main purpose of this analysis is to check whether one can d istinguish between tumor and normal tissues on the basis of gene expression data. Since we know in what aspect of the data’s structure we are interested, in this problem the working resolution is de termined as the value at which the data first breaks into two (or more) large clusters (containing, say, m ore than ten tissues). There may be, however, other parameters for the clustering a lgorithm, which should be determined. For example, the SPC algorithm has a single parameter K, which determines how many data points are considered as neighbors of a given point. The algorithm p laces edges or arcs that connect pairs of neighbors i, j, and assigns a weight Jijto each edge, whose value decreases with the distance |/vector xi−/vector xj| between the neighboring data-points. Hence the outcome of t he clustering process may depend on K, the number of neighbors connected to each data point by an edg e. We would like to use our resampling method to determine the optimal value for this parameter. We clustered the tissues, using SPC, for several values of K. For each case we identified the temper- ature at which the first split to large clusters occurred. For each case we performed the same resampling scheme, with m= 20 resamples of size2 3nt, and calculated the figure of merit M(K). The results ob- tained for several values of Kare plotted in figure 8. Very low and very high values of Kgive similarly stable solutions. In the low- Kcase each point is practically isolated, and the data breaks immediately into microscopic clusters. The high- Kcase is just the opposite – each points is considered “close” to very many other points, and no macroscopic partition can be obtai ned. AtK= 8 we observe, however, another peak in M. At this Kthe clustering algorithm yields indeed two large clusters, which correspond to the two “correct” cl usters of normal and tumor tissues, as shown on Fig. 9. Such solutions appear also for some higher values o fK, but in these cases the clusters are not stable against resampling. 4.3.2 Clustering genes Cluster analysis of the genes is performed in order to identi fy groups of genes which act cooperatively. Having identified a cluster of genes, one may look for a biolog ical mechanism that makes their expression correlated. Trying to answer this question, one may, for exa mple, identify common promoters of these genes (Getz et al., 2000b). One may also use one or more cluste rs of genes to reclassify the tissues (Getz et al., 2000a), looking for clinical manifestations associ ated with the expression levels of the selected groups of genes. Therefore in this case it is important to ass ess the reliability of each particular gene cluster separately. 9Figure 9: Clustering of the tissues, using K=8. Leaves of the tree are colored according to the known classification to normal (dark) and tumor (light). The two la rge clusters marked by arrows recover the tumor/normal classification. The SPC clustering algorithm was used to cluster the genes. A resulting dendrogram is presented in Fig. 10, in which each box represents a cluster of genes. Our r esampling scheme has been applied to this data, using m= 25 resamples of size 1200 ( f= 0.6). This time, however, we calculated M(C),for each cluster C of the full original sample, separately. That is, we calcula tedMonly for the points of a single cluster C, at the temperature at which it was identified, and then moved on to the next cluster. We therefore get a stability measure for each cluster. Next, we focus our attention on clusters of the highest scores. First, we considered the top 20 clusters. If one of th ese clusters is a descendent of another one from the list of 20, we discard it. After this pruning we were l eft with 6 clusters, which are circled and numbered in figure 10 (the numbers are not related to the stabi lity score). We are now ready to interpret these stable clusters. The first three consist of known families of genes. #1 is a cluster Ribosomal proteins. The genes of clust er #2 are all Cytochrome C genes, which are involved in energy transfer. Most of the genes of cluster #3 belong to the HLA-2 family, which are histocompatability antigens. Cluster #4 contains a variety of genes, some of which are rela ted to metabolism. When trying to cluster the tissues based on these genes alone, we find a stabl e partition to two clusters, which is not consistent with the tumor/normal labeling. At this point, w e are still unable to explain this partition. Clusters #5 and #6 also contain genes of various types. The ge nes of these clusters have most typical behavior: all the genes of cluster #5 are highly expressed in the normal tissues but not in the tumor ones; And all genes of cluster #6 are the other way around. To summarize, clustering stability score based on resampli ng enabled us to zero in on clusters with typical behavior, which may have biological meaning. Using resampling enabled us to select clusters without making any new assumption, which is a major advantag e in exploratory research. The downside of this method, however, is it’s computational burden. In th is experiment we had to perform clustering analysis 20 times for a rather large data set. This would be th e typical case for DNA microarray data. 5 Discussion This work proposes a method to validate clustering analysis results, based on resampling. It is assumed that a cluster which is robust to resampling is less likely to be the result of a sample artifact or fluctuations. The strength of this method is that it requires no additional assumptions. Specifically, no assumption is made either about the structure of the data, the expected c lusters, or the noise in the data. No information, except the available data itself, is used. We introduced a figure of merit, M, which reflects the stability of the cluster partition again st resampling. The typical behavior of this figure of merit as a f unction of the resolution parameter allows clear identification of natural resolution scales in the pro blem. The question of natural resolution levels is inherent to the clustering problem, and thus emerges in any clustering scheme. The resampling method introduced he re is general, and applicable to any kind of data set, and to any clustering algorithm. 10200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 20002030405060708090 251 64 Figure 10: Dendrogram of genes. Clusters of size 7 or larger a re shown as boxes. Selected clusters are circled and numbered, as explained in the text. 11For a simple one-dimensional model we derived an analytical expression for our figure of merit and its behavior as a function of the resolution parameter. Loca l maxima were identified for values of the parameter corresponding to stable clustering solutions. S uch solutions can either be trivial (at very low and very high resolution); or non-trivial, revealing genui ne internal structure of the data. Resampling is a viable method provided the original data set is large enough, so that a typical resample still reflects the same underlying structure. If this is the c ase, our experience shows that a dilution factor off≃2/3 works well for both small and large data sets. Acknowledgments This research was partially supported by the Germany - Israe l Science Foundation (GIF). We thank Ido Kanter and Gad Getz for discussions. References Alon, U. et al. (1999). Broad patterns of gene expression rev ealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA , 96:6745–6750. Bezdek, J. (1981). Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorit hms. Plenum Press, New York. Bezdek, J. and Pal, N. (1995). Cluster validation with gener alized dunn’s indeices. Proc. 1995 2nd NZ int’l., pages 190–193. Blatt, M., Wiseman, S., and Domany, E. (1996). Super–parama gnetic clustering of data. Physical Review Letters , 76:3251–3255. Bock, H. (1985). On significance tests in cluster analysis. J. Classification , 2:77–108. Brown, P. and Botstein, D. (1999). Exploring the new world of the genome with dna microarrays. Nature Genetics , 21:33 – 37. Chee, M. et al. (1996). Accessing genetic information with h igh-density dna arrays. Science , 274:610–614. Cover, T. and Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of Information Theory . Wiley–Interscience, New York. Cutler, A. and Windham, M. (1994). Information-based valid ity functionals for mixture analysis. Proc. 1st US/Japan conf. on frontiers in statistical modeling , pages 149–170. Davies, D. and Bouldin, D. (1979). A cluster separation meas ure.IEEE trans. PAMI , pages 224–227. Domany, E. (1999). Super-paramagnetic clustering of data – the definitive solution of an ill-posed problem. Physica A , 263:158. Duda, R. and Hart, P. (1973). Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis . Wiley–Interscience, New York. Dunn, J. (1974). A fuzzy relative isodata process and its use in detecting compact well-separated clusters. J. Cybernetics , 3:32–57. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap . Chapman & Hall. Fukunaga, K. (1990). Introduction to statistical Pattern Recognition . Academic Press, San Diego. Getz, G., Levine, E., and Domany, E. (2000a). Coupled two-wa y clustering of dna microarry data. physics/0004009. Getz, G., Levine, E., Domany, E., and Zhang, M. (2000b). Supe r-paramagnetic clustering of yeast gene expression profiles. physics/9911038. Good, P. (1999). Resampling methods . Springer-Verlag, New York. Jain, A. and Dubes, R. (1988). Algorithms for Clustering Data . Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Jain, A. and Moreau, J. (1986). Bootstrap technique in clust er analysis. Pattern Recognition , 20:547–569. Levine, E. (2000). Unsupervised estimation of clsuter validity – Methods and A pplications. M.Sc. Thesis, The Weizmann Inst. of Science. Pal, N. and Bezdek, J. (1995). On cluster validity for the fuz zy c-means model. IEEE trans. Fuzzy Systems , 3:370–376. Smyth, P. (1996). Clustering using monte carlo cross-valid ation. KDD-96 Proceedings, Second Interna- tional Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pages 126–133. Windham, M. (1982). Cluster validity for the fuzzy c-means c lustering algorithm. IEEE trans. PAMI , 4:357–363. 12

arXiv:physics/0005047v1 [physics.geo-ph] 18 May 2000Geometry of River Networks I: Scaling, Fluctuations, and Deviations Peter Sheridan Dodds† Department of Mathematics and Department of Earth, Atmosph eric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 0213 9. Daniel H. Rothman‡ Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 0213 9. (Dated: February 2, 2008) This article is the first in a series of three papers investiga ting the detailed geometry of river net- works. Branching networks are a universal structure employ ed in the distribution and collection of material. Large-scale river networks mark an important c lass of two-dimensional branching networks, being not only of intrinsic interest but also a per vasive natural phenomenon. In the description of river network structure, scaling laws are un iformly observed. Reported values of scaling exponents vary suggesting that no unique set of scal ing exponents exists. To improve this current understanding of scaling in river networks and to provide a fuller description of branching network structure, here we report a theoretical a nd empirical study of fluctuations about and deviations from scaling. We examine data for conti nent-scale river networks such as the Mississippi and the Amazon and draw inspiration from a si mple model of directed, random networks. We center our investigations on the scaling of the length of sub-basin’s dominant stream with its area, a characterization of basin shape know n as Hack’s law. We generalize this relationship to a joint probability density and provid e observations and explanations of deviations from scaling. We show that fluctuations about sca ling are substantial and grow with system size. We find strong deviations from scaling at small s cales which can be explained by the existence of linear network structure. At intermediate scales, we find slow drifts in exponent values indicating that scaling is only approximately obeye d and that universality remains inde- terminate. At large scales, we observe a breakdown in scalin g due to decreasing sample space and correlations with overall basin shape. The extent of app roximate scaling is significantly restricted by these deviations and will not be improved by in creases in network resolution. PACS numbers: 64.60.Ht, 92.40.Fb, 92.40.Gc, 68.70.+w I. INTRODUCTION Networks are intrinsic to a vast number of complex forms observed in the natural and man-made world. Net- works repeatedly arise in the distribution and sharing of information, stresses and materials. Complex networks give rise to interesting mathematical and physical proper- ties as observed in the Internet [1], the “small-world” phe- nomenon [2], the cardiovascular system [3], force chains in granular media [4], and the wiring of the brain [5]. Branching, hierarchical geometries make up an impor- tant subclass of all networks. Our present investigations concern the paradigmatic example of river networks. The study of river networks, though more general in applica- tion, is an integral part of geomorphology, the theory of earth surface processes and form. Furthermore, river net- works are held to be natural exemplars of allometry, i.e., how the dimensions of different parts of a structure scale or grow with respect to each other [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. The shapes of drainage basins, for example, are reported toelongate with increasing basin size [11, 12, 13]. At present, there is no generally accepted theory explaining the origin of this allometric scaling. The fun- damental problem is that an equation of motion for ero- sion, formulated from first principles, is lacking. The sit- uation is somewhat analogous to issues surrounding the description of the dynamics of granular media [14, 15], noting that erosion is arguably far more complex. Nev- ertheless, a number of erosion equations have been pro- posed ranging from deterministic [16, 17, 18, 19] to stochastic theories [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Each of these models attempts to describe how eroding sur- faces evolve dynamically. In addition, various heuris- tic models of both surface and network evolution also exist. Examples include simple lattice-based models of erosion [17, 26, 27, 28], an analogy to invasion per- colation [29], the use of optimality principles and self- organized criticality [7, 30, 31], and even uncorrelated random networks [10, 32, 33]. Since river networks are an essential feature of eroding landscapes, any appropri- ate theory of erosoion must yield surfaces with network Typeset by REVT EX2 structures comparable to that of the real world. Howev- er, no model of eroding landscapes or even simply of net- work evolution unambiguously reproduces the wide range of scaling behavior reported for real river networks. A considerable problem facing these theories and mod- els is that the values of scaling exponents for river net- work scaling laws are not precisely known. One of the issues we address in this work is universality [10, 12]. Do the scaling exponents of all river networks belong to a unique universality class or are there a set of classes obtained for various geomorphological conditions? For example, theoretical models suggest a variety of expo- nent values for networks that are directed versus non- directed, created on landscapes with heterogeneous ver- sus homogeneous erosivity and so on [10, 34, 35]. Clearly, refined measurements of scaling exponents are imperative if we are to be sure of any network belonging to a par- ticular universality class. Moreover, given that there is no accepted theory derivable from simple physics, more detailed phenomenological studies are required. Motivated by this situation, we perform here a detailed investigation of the scaling properties of river networks. We analytically characterize fluctuations about scaling showing that they grow with system size. We also report significant and ubiquitous deviations from scaling in real river networks. This implies surprisingly strong restric- tions on the parameter regimes where scaling holds and cautions against measurements of exponents that ignore such limitations. In the case of the Mississippi basin, for example, we find that although our study region span four orders of magnitude in length, scaling may be deemed valid over no more than 1.5 orders of magnitude. Furthermore, we repeatedly find the scaling within these bounds to be only approximate and that no exact, single exponent can be deduced. We show that scaling breaks down at small scales due to the presence of linear basins and at large scales due to the inherent discreteness of net- work structure and correlations with overall basin shape. Significantly, this latter correlation imprints upon river network structure the effects and history of geology. This paper is the first of a series of three on river- network geometry. Having addressed scaling laws in the present work, we proceed in second and third arti- cles [36, 37] to consider river network structure at a more detailed level. In [36] we examine the statistics of the “building blocks” of river networks, i.e., segments of streams and sub-networks. In particular, we analytically connect distributions of various kinds of stream length. Part of this material is employed in the present article and is a direct generalization of Horton’s laws [38, 39]. In the third article [37], we proceed from the findings of [36] to characterize how these building blocks fit together. Central to this last work is the study of the frequency and spatial distributions of tributary branches along the length of a stream and is itself a generalization of the descriptive picture of Tokunaga [40, 41, 42].II. BASIN ALLOMETRY A Hack’s law In addressing these broader issues of scaling in branch- ing networks, we set as our goal to understand the river network scaling relationship between basin area aand the length lof a basin’s main stream: l∝ah. (1) Known as Hack’s law [11], this relation is central to the study of scaling in river networks [12, 39]. Hack’s expo- nenthis empirically found to lie in the range from 0.5 to 0.7 [11, 12, 13, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48]. Here, we pos- tulate a generalized form of Hack’s law that shows good agreement with data from real world networks. We focus on Hack’s law because of its intrinsic interest and also because many interrelationships between a large number of scaling laws are known and only a small subset are understood to be independent [12, 39]. Thus, our results for Hack’s law will be in principle extendable to other scaling laws. With this in mind, we will also discuss probability densities of stream length and drainage area. Hack’s law is stated rather loosely in equation (1) and implicitly involves some type of averaging which needs to be made explicit. It is most usually considered to be the relationship between mean main stream length and drainage area, i.e., ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}ht ∝ah. (2) Here,∝an}bracketle{t·∝an}bracketri}htdenotes ensemble average and ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}ht=∝an}bracketle{tl(a)∝an}bracketri}htis the mean main stream length of all basins of area a. Typi- cally, one performs regression analysis on log ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}htagainst logato obtain the exponent h. B Fluctuations and deviations In seeking to understand Hack’s law, we are natural- ly led to wonder about the underlying distribution that gives rise to this mean relationship. By considering fluc- tuations, we begin to see Hack’s law as an expression of basin morphology. What shapes of basins characterized by (a, l) are possible and with what probability do they occur? An important point here is that Hack’s law does not exactly specify basin shapes. An additional connection to Euclidean dimensions of the basin is required. We may think of a basin’s longitudinal length L/bardbland its width L⊥. The main stream length lis reported to scale with L/bardblas l∝Ld /bardbl, (3) where typically 1 .0/lessorsimilard/lessorsimilar1.1, [12, 50]. Hence, we have a∝l1/h∝Ld/h /bardbl. All other relevant scaling laws expo- nents can be related to the pair of exponents ( d, h) which3 (a) (b) FIG. 1: The Full Hack distribution for the Kansas, (a), and Mississippi, (b), river basins. For each value of a, the distribution has been normalized along the ldirection by max lP(a, l) [49]. therefore characterize the universality class of a river ne t- work [10, 39]. If d/h= 2 we have that basins are self- similar whereas if d/h < 2, we have that basins are elon- gating. So, while Hack’s law gives a sense of basin allom- etry, the fractal properties of main stream lengths needalso be known in order to properly quantify the scaling of basin shape. In addition to fluctuations, complementary insights are provided by the observation and understanding of devi- ations from scaling. We are thus interested in discerning the regularities and quirks of the joint probability dis- tribution P(a, l). We will refer to P(a, l) as the Hack distribution . Hack distributions for the Kansas river basin and the Mississippi river basin are given in Figures 1(a) and 1(b). Fluctuations about and deviations from scaling are immediately evident for the Kansas and to a lesser extent for the Mississippi. The first section of the paper will propose and derive analytic forms for the Hack distri- bution under the assumption of uniform scaling with no deviations. Here, as well as in the following two papers of this series [36, 37], we will motivate our results with a random network model originally due to Scheidegger [33]. We then expand our discussion to consider deviations from exact scaling. In the case of the Kansas river, a striking example of deviations from scaling is the linear branch separated from the body of the main distribu- tion shown in Figure 1(a). This feature is less prominent in the lower resolution Mississippi data. Note that this linear branch is not an artifact of the measurement tech- nique or data set used. This will be explained in our dis- cussion of deviations at small scales in the paper’s second section. We then consider the more subtle deviations associated with intermediate scales. At first inspection, the scaling appears to be robust. However, we find gradual drifts in “exponents” that prevent us from identifying a precise value of hand hence a corresponding universality class. Both distributions also show breakdowns in scaling for large areas and stream lengths and this is addressed in the final part of our section on deviations. The reason for such deviations is partly due to the decrease in number of samples and hence self-averaging, as area and stream lengths are increased. However, we will show that the direction of the deviations depends on the overall basin shape. We will quantify the extent to which such devi- ations can occur and the effect that they have on mea- surements of Hack’s exponent h. Throughout the paper, we will return to the Hack dis- tributions for the Kansas and the Mississippi rivers as well as data obtained for the Amazon, the Nile and the Congo rivers. III. FLUCTUATIONS: AN ANALYTIC FORM FOR THE HACK DISTRIBUTION To provide some insight into the nature of the under- lying Hack distribution, we present a line of reasoning that will build up from Hack’s law to a scaling form of P(a, l). First let us assume for the present discussion of4 fluctuations that an exact form of Hack’s law holds: ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}ht=θah(4) where we have introduced the coefficient θwhich we dis- cuss fully later on. Now, since Hack’s law is a power law, it is reasonable to postulate a generalization of the form P(l|a) =1 ahFl/parenleftbiggl ah/parenrightbigg . (5) The prefactor 1 /ahprovides the correct normalization andFlis the “scaling function” we hope to understand. The above will be our notation for all conditional prob- abilities. Implicit in equation (5) is the assumption that all moments and the distribution itself also scale. For example, the qth moment of P(l|a) is ∝an}bracketle{tlq(a)∝an}bracketri}ht ∝aqh, (6) which implies ∝an}bracketle{tlq(a)∝an}bracketri}ht=k−qh∝an}bracketle{tlq(ak)∝an}bracketri}ht. (7) where k∈R. Also, for the distribution P(l|a) it follows from equation (5) that khP(lkh|ak) =kh ahkhFl/parenleftbigglkh ahkh/parenrightbigg =P(l|a).(8) We note that previous investigations of Hack’s law [12, 13] consider the generalization in equation (5). Rigon et al.[48] also examine the behavior of the moments of the distribution P(l|a) for real networks. Here, we will go further to characterize the full distribution P(a, l) as well as both P(l|a) and P(a|l). Along these lines, Rigon et al.[13] suggest that the function Fl(x) is a “finite-size” scaling function analogous to those found in statistical mechanics, i.e.: Fl(x)→0 asx→ ∞ andFl(x)→cas x→0. However, as we will detail below, the restrictions onFl(x) can be made stronger and we will postulate a simple Gaussian form. More generally, Fl(x) should be a unimodal distribution that is non-zero for an interval [x1, x2] where x1>0. This is so because for any given fixed basin area a, there is a minimum and maximum l beyond which no basin exists. This is also clear upon inspection of Figures 1(a) and 1(b). We observe that neither drainage area nor main stream length possess any obvious features so as to be deemed the independent variable. Hence, we can also view Hack’s law as its inversion ∝an}bracketle{ta∝an}bracketri}ht ∝l1/h. Note that the constant of proportionality is not necessarily θ1/hand is dependent on the nature of the full Hack distribution. We thus have another scaling ansatz as per equation (5) P(a|l) = 1/l1/hFa(a/l1/h). (9) The conditional probabilities P(l|a) and P(a|l) are related to the joint probability distribution as P(a, l) =P(a)P(l|a) =P(l)P(a|l), (10)where P(l) andP(a) are the probability densities of main stream length and area. These distributions are in turn observed to be power laws both in real world networks and models [7, 51, 52]: P(a)∼Naa−τand P(l)∼Nll−γ. (11) where NaandNlare appropriate prefactors and the tilde indicates asymptotic agreement between both sides for large values of the argument. Furthermore, the expo- nents τandγare related to Hack’s exponent hvia the scaling relations [12, 39] τ= 2−h and γ= 1/h. (12) Equations (5), (9), (10), (11), and (12) combine to give us two forms for P(a, l), P(a, l) = 1/a2F(l/ah) = 1/l2/hG(a/l1/h), (13) where x−2F(x−h) =G(x) and, equivalently, F(y) = y−2G(y−1/h). IV. RANDOM DIRECTED NETWORKS We will use results from the Scheidegger model [33] to motivate the forms of these distributions. In doing so, we will also connect with some problems in the theory of random walks. FIG. 2: Scheidegger’s model of random, directed net- works. Flow is down the page and at each site, stream flow is randomly chosen to be in one of the two downward diagonals. Stream paths and basin boundaries are thus discrete random walks. Scheidegger’s model of river networks is defined on a triangular lattice as indicated by Figure 2. Flow in the figure is directed down the page. At each site, the stream flow direction is randomly chosen between the two diag- onal directions shown. Periodic boundary conditions are applied in all of our simulations. Each site locally drains an area of α2, where the lattice unit αis the distance between neighboring sites, and each segment of stream has a length α. For simplicity, we will take αto be unity. We note that connections exist between the Scheideg- ger model and models of particle aggregation [51, 53],5 Abelian sandpiles [54, 55, 56] and limiting cases of force chain models in granular media [4]. Since Scheidegger’s model is based on random flow directions, the Hack distributions have simple interpre- tations. The boundaries of drainage basins in the model are random walks. Understanding Hack’s law therefore amounts to understanding the first collision time of two random walks that share the same origin in one dimen- sion. If we subtract the graph of one walk from the other, we see that the latter problem is itself equivalent to the first return problem of random walks [57]. Many facets of the first return problem are well under- stood. In particular, the probability of n, the number of steps taken by a random walk until it first returns to the origin, is asymptotically given by P(n)∼1√ 2πn−3/2. (14) But this number of steps is also the length of the basin l. Therefore, we have P(l)∼2 πl−3/2, (15) where because we are considering the difference of two walks, we use P(l) =P(n/2)|n=l. Also, we have found the prefactor Nl= 2/π. We thus have that γ= 3/2 for the Scheidegger model. The scaling relations of equation (12) then give h= 2/3 andτ= 4/3. The value of his also readily obtained by noting that the typical area of a basin of length lis a∝l·l1/2=l3/2=l1/hsince the boundaries are random walks. V. AREA-LENGTH DISTRIBUTION FOR RANDOM, DIRECTED NETWORKS Something that is less well studied is the joint distri- bution of the area enclosed by a random walk and the number of steps to its first return. In terms of the Schei- degger model, this is precisely the Hack distribution. We motivate some general results based on observa- tions of the Scheidegger model. Figure 3 shows the nor- malized distributions P(al−3/2) andP(la−2/3) as derived from simulations of the model. Given the scaling ansatzes forP(l|a) and P(a|l) in equations (5) and (9), we see thatP(y=la−2/3) =Fl(y) and P(x=al−3/2) =Fa(x). Note that we have already used Hack’s law for the Scheidegger model with h= 2/3 to obtain these distri- butions. The results are for ten realizations of the model on a 104by 104lattice, taking 107samples from each of the ten instances. For P(a|l), only sites where l≥100 were taken, and similarly, for P(l|a), only sites where a≥500 were included in the histogram. We postulate that the distribution P(y=la−2/3) is a Gaussian having the form P(l|a) =1√ 2πa2/3ηexp{−(la−2/3−θ)2/2η2}(16)0 1 2 300.511.522.533.5 P(l a−2/3)P(a l −3/2) FIG. 3: Cross-Sectional scaling functions of the Hack distribution for the Scheidegger model with lattice con- stant equal to unity. Both distributions are normalized. The right distribution is for lfixed and avarying and is postulated to be a normal distribution. The left dis- tribution for afixed and lvarying and is a form of an inverse Gaussian [58]. The data used was obtained for all sites with with l≥100 and a≥500 respectively. Each distribution was obtained from ten realizations of the Scheidegger model on a 104×104lattice. We estimate the mean of Flto be θ≃1.675 (this is the same θas found in equation (4)) and the standard deviation to be η≃0.321. The fit is shown in Figure 3 as a solid line. The above equation agrees with the form of the scaling ansatz of equation (5) and we now have the assertion that Flis a Gaussian defined by the two parameters θandη. Note that the θandηare coefficients for the actual mean and standard deviation. In other words, for fixed a, the mean of P(l|a) isθa2/3and its standard deviation isηa2/3. Having observed their context, we will refer to θandηas the Hack mean coefficient and Hack standard deviation coefficient. From this starting point we can create P(a, l) and P(a|l), the latter providing a useful test. Since P(a)∼ Naa−τ=Naa−4/3, as per equation (11), we have P(a, l) =Na a4/31√ 2πa2/3ηexp{−(la−2/3−θ)2/2η2}, =Na√ 2πa2ηexp{−(la−2/3−θ)2/2η2}. (17) As expected, we observe the form of equation (17) to be6 in accordance with that of equation (13). Note that the scaling function F(and equivalently G) is defined by the three parameters θ,ηandNa, the latter of which may be determined in terms of the former as we will show below. Also, since we expect all scaling functions to be only asymptotically correct, we cannot use equation (17) to find an expression for the normalization Na. Equa- tion (17) ceases to be valid for small aandl. However, we will be able to do so once we have P(a|l) since we are able to presume lis large and therefore that the scal- ing form is exact. Using equation (15) and the fact that P(a|l) =P(a, l)/P(l) from equation (10) we then have P(a|l) =πl3/2 2Na√ 2πa2ηexp{−(l/a2/3−θ)2/2η2}, =Na√πl3/2 23/2a2ηexp{−(l/a2/3−θ)2/2η2}, =1 l3/2Na√π 23/2η(a/l3/2)−2 ×exp{−((a/l3/2)−2/3−θ)2/2η2}. (18) In rearranging the expression of P(a|l), we have made clear that its form matches that of equation (5). A closed form expression for the normalization factor Namay now be determined by employing the fact that/integraltext∞ a=0da P(a|l) = 1. 1 =/integraldisplay∞ a=0da P(a|l), =/integraldisplay∞ a=0da l3/2Na√π 23/2η(a/l3/2)−2 ×exp{−((a/l3/2)−2/3−θ)2/2η2}, =Na√ 3π 25/2η/integraldisplay∞ u=0du u1/2exp{−(u−θ)2/2η2},(19) where we have used the substitution a/l3/2=u−3/2and hence also l−3/2da= (−3/2)u−5/2du. We therefore have Na=25/2η√ 3π/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay∞ u=0du u1/2exp{−(u−θ)2/2η2}/bracketrightbigg−1 . (20) We may thus write down all of the scaling functions Fl,Fa,FandGfor the Scheidegger model: Fl(z) =1√ 2πηexp{−(z−θ)2/2η2}, (21) Fa(z) =Na√π 23/2ηz−2exp{−(z−2/3−θ)2/2η2},(22) F(z) =Na√ 2πηexp{−(z−θ)2/2η2},and (23) G(z) =2Na√π23/2ηz−2exp{−(z−2/3−θ)2/2η2}.(24) Recall that all of these forms rest on the assumption thatFl(z) is a Gaussian. In order to check this assump- tion, we return to Figure 3. The empirical distributionP(z=a/l3/2) is shown on the left marked with cir- cles. The solid line through these points is Fa(z) as given above in equation (21). There is an excellent match so we may be confident about our proposed form for Fa(z). We note that the function Fa(z) may be thought of as a frac- tional inverse Gaussian distribution, the inverse Gaussia n being a well known distribution arising in the study of first passage times for random walks [57]. It is worth contemplating the peculiar form of P(a|l) in terms of first return random walks. Here, we have been able to postulate the functional form of the distribution of areas bound by random walks that first return after nsteps. If one could understand the origin of the Gaussian and find analytic expressions for θandη, then the problem would be fully solved. VI. AREA-LENGTH DISTRIBUTION EXTENDED TO REAL NETWORKS We now seek to extend these results for Scheidegger’s model to real world networks. We will look for the same functional forms for the Hack distributions that we have found above. The conditional probability distributions pertaining to Hack’s law take on the forms P(l|a) = 1/a−hFl(la−h) =a−h √ 2πηexp{−(la−h−θ)2/2η2}, (25) and P(a|l) =l−1/hFa(al−1/h) =l−1/hNa√ 2πNlη(al−1/h)−2exp{−((al−1/h)−h−θ)2/2η2}, (26) and the full Hack distribution is given by P(a, l) =a2F(la−h) =l−2/hG(al−1/h) =Na√ 2πηa2exp{−(la−h−θ)2/2η2}.(27) withNadetermined by equation (20). The three param- eters h, the Hack exponent, θ, the Hack mean coeffi- cient, and η, the Hack standard deviation coefficient, are in principle landscape dependent. Furthermore, in ηwe have a basic measure of fluctuations in the morphology of basins. Figures 4 and 5 present Hack scaling functions for the Mississippi and Nile river basins. These Figures is to be compared with the results for the Scheidegger model in Figure 3. For both rivers, Hack’s exponent hwas determined first from a stream ordering analysis (we discuss stream ordering later in Section X). Estimates of the parameters θandηwere then made using the scaling function Fl presuming a Gaussian form. We observe the Gaussian fit for the Mississippi is more satisfactory than that for the Nile. These fits are not7 0123400.511.522.5 Fl (l a−h) Fa (a l −1/h) FIG. 4: Cross-sectional scaling functions of the Hack distribution for the Mississippi. The estimates used for Hack’s exponent are h= 0.55 and h= 0.50 respectively, the determination of which is discussed in section VII. The fits indicated by the smooth curves to the data are made as per the Scheidegger model in Figure 3 and according to equations (25) and (25). The values of the Hack mean coefficient and standard deviation coefficient are estimated to be θ≃0.80 and η≃0.20. rigorously made because even though we have chosen data ranges where deviations (which we address in the following section) are minimal, deviations from scaling do still skew the distributions. The specific ranges used to obtain FlandFarespectively are for the Mississippi: 8.5<log10a <9.5 and 4 .75<log10l <6, and for the Nile: 9 <log10a <11 and 5 .5<log10l <6 (areas are in km2and lengths km). Furthermore, we observe that the estimate of hhas an effect in the resulting forms of Fl andFa. Nevertheless, here we are attempting to capture the essence of the generalized form of Hack’s law in real networks. We then use the parameters h,θandηand equa- tion (26) to construct our theoretical Fa, the smooth curves in Figures 4 and 5. As for the Scheidegger model data in Figure 3, we see in both examples approximate agreement between the measured Faand the one predict- ed from the form of Fl. Table I shows estimates of h,θ andηfor the five major river basins studied. Given our reservations about the precision of these val- ues of θandη, we are nevertheless able to make qualita- tive distinctions. Recalling that ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}ht=θah, we see that, for fixed h, higher values of θindicate relatively longer stream lengths for a given area and hence longer and thin-0 1 2 3 400.20.40.60.8100.20.40.60.81 012345678 Fa (a / l 1/h) Fl (l /a h) FIG. 5: Cross-sectional scaling functions of the Hack distribution for the Nile. The top and right axes corre- spond to Faand the bottom and left to Fl. The Hack exponent used is h= 0.50 and the values of the Hack mean coefficient and standard deviation coefficient are estimate to be θ≃2.45 and η≃0.50 [59]. River network θ η h Mississippi 0.80 0.20 0.55 Amazon 1.90 0.35 0.52 Nile 2.45 0.50 0.50 Kansas 0.70 0.15 0.57 Congo 0.89 0.18 0.54 TABLE I: Estimates of Hack distribution parameters for real river networks. The scaling exponent his Hack’s exponent. The parameters θandηare coefficients of the mean and standard deviation of the conditional proba- bility density function P(l|a) and are fully discussed in the text [60]. ner basins. The results therefore suggest the Nile, and to a lesser degree the Amazon, have basins with thinner profiles than the Congo and, in particular, the Mississippi and Kansas. This seems not unreasonable since the Nile is a strongly directed network constrained within a rel- atively narrow overall shape. This is somewhat in spite of the fact that the shape of an overall river basin is not necessarily related to its internal basin morphology, an observation we will address later in Section X. The importance of θis tempered by the value of h. Hack’s exponent affects not only the absolute measure of8 stream length for a given area but also how basin shapes change with increasing area. So, in the case of the Kansas the higher value of hsuggests basin profiles thin with increasing size. This is in keeping with overall direct- edness of the network. Note that our measurements of the fractal dimension dof stream lengths for the Kansas place it to be d= 1.04±0.02. Therefore, d/h≃1.9<2 and elongation is still expected when we factor in the scaling of lwithL/bardbl. The Nile and Amazon also all have relatively high η indicating greater fluctuations in basin shape. In compar- ison, the Mississippi, Kansas and Congo appear to have less variation. Note that the variability of the Kansas is in reasonable agreement with that of the whole Missis- sippi river network for which it is a sub-basin. Finally, regardless of the actual form of the distribution underlying Hack’s law, fluctuations are always present and an estimate of their extent is an important measure- ment. Thus, the Hack mean and standard deviation coef- ficients, θandη, are suggested to be of sufficient worth so as to be included with any measurement of the Hack exponent h. VII. DEVIATIONS FROM SCALING In generalizing Hack’s law, we have sought out regions of robust scaling, discarding ranges where deviations become prominent. We now bring our attention to the nature of the deviations themselves. We observe three major classes of deviations which we will define by the scales at which they occur: small, inter- mediate and large. Throughout the following sections we primarily consider deviations from the mean version of Hack’s law, ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}ht=θah, given in equation (4). Much of the understanding we gain from this will be extendable to deviations for higher moments. To provide an overview of what follows, examples of mean-Hack distributions for the Kansas river and the Mississippi are shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b). Hack’s law for the Kansas river exhibits a marked deviation for small areas, starting with a near linear relationship between stream length and area. A long crossover region of several orders of magnitude in area then leads to an intermediate scaling regime wherein we attempt to deter- mine the Hack exponent h. In doing so, we show that such regions of robust scaling are surprisingly limited for river network quantities. Moreover, we observe that, where present, scaling is only approximate and that no exact exponents can be ascribed to the networks we study here. It follows that the identification of universality classes based on empirical evidence is a hazardous step. Finally, the approximate scaling of this intermediate region then gives way to a break down in scaling at larger scales due to low sampling and correlations with basin shape. The same deviations are present in the relatively coarse-grained Mississippi data but are less pronounced.(a) 45678910111223456 log10alog10l (b) 67891011121334567 log10alog10l FIG. 6: The mean version of Hack’s law for the Kansas, (a), and the Mississippi, (b). The units of lengths and areas are meters and square meters. These are calculat- ed from the full Hack distributions shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) by finding ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}htfor each value of basin area a. Area samples are taken every 0.02 orders of magnitude in logarithmic space. The upper dashed lines represent a slope of unity in both plots and the lower lines the Hack exponents 0 .57 and 0 .55 for the Kansas and Mississippi respectively. For the Kansas, there is a clear deviation for small area which rolls over into a region of very slow- ly changing derivative before breaking up at large scales. Deviations from scaling are present for the lower resolu- tion dataset of the Mississippi but to a lesser extent.9 3.544.555.5622.533.5 log10alog10l FIG. 7: The linearity of Hack’s law at small scales for the Kansas river. The linear regime enters a crossover region after almost 1.5 orders of magnitude in area. This is an expanded detail of the mean Hack’s law given in Figure 6(a) and areas and lengths are in square meters and meters. VIII. DEVIATIONS AT SMALL SCALES At small scales, we find the mean-Hack distribution to follow a linear relationship, i.e., l∝a1. This feature is most evident for the Kansas river as shown in Figure 6(a) and in more detail in Figure 7. The linear regime per- sists for nearly 1.5 orders of magnitude in basin area. To a lesser extent, the same trend is apparent in the Missis- sippi data, Figure 6(b). Returning to the full Hack distribution of Figures 1(a) and 1(b), we begin to see the origin of this linear regime. In both instances, a linear branch separates from the body of the main distribution. Since lcannot grow faster thana1, the linear branch marks an upper bound on the extent of the distribution in ( a, l) coordinates. When averaged to give the mean-Hack distribution, this linear data dominates the result for small scales. We find this branch evident in all Hack distributions. It is not an artifact of resolution and in fact becomes more pronounced with increased map precision. The ori- gin of this linear branch is simple: data points along the branch correspond to positions in narrow sub-networks, i.e., long, thin “valleys.” To understand the separation of this linear branch from the main body of the distribu- tion, consider Figure 8 which depicts a stream draining such a valley with length and area ( l1, a1) that meets a/0/1/0/0/1/1 /0/0/1/1/CP/BD /CP/BF /CP/BE /D0/BE/D0/BD /BE/BD FIG. 8: Origin of the linear branch in the Hack distri- bution. The sub-basins labeled 1 and 2 depicted on the left have areas a1anda2and lengths l1andl2. These sub-basins combine to form a basin of area a3=a1+a2 and main stream length l3= max l1, l2=l2. Since sub- basin 1 is a linear sub-network (a valley) the pair ( a1, l1) lie along the linear branch of the Hack distribution as shown on the right. Points along the main stream of sub-basin 1 lie along the dashed line leading to the coor- dinate ( a1, l1). On combining with the second basin, the jump in the resultant area creates a jump from ( a1, l1to (a3, l2) in the main body of the Hack distribution. stream from a basin with characteristics ( l2, a2). The area and length of the basin formed at this junction is thus ( a3, l3) = ( a1+a2,max(l1, l2)) (in the Figure, max(l1, l2) =l2). The greater jump in area moves the point across into the main body of the Hack distribu- tion, creating the separation of the linear branch. In fact, the full Hack distribution is itself comprised of many such linear segments. As in the above example,10 until a stream does not meet any streams of comparable size, then its area and length will roughly increase in linear fashion. When it does meet such a stream, there is a jump in area and the trace of a new linear segment is started in the distribution. We will see this most clearly later on when we study deviations at large scales. For very fine scale maps, on the order of meters, we might expect to pick up the scale of the unchannelized, convex regions of a landscape, i.e., “hillslopes” [61]. Thi s length scale represents the typical separation of branches at a network’s finest scale. The computation of stream networks for these hillslope regions would result in large- ly non-convergent (divergent or parallel) flow. There- fore, we would have linear “basins” that would in theory contribute to the linear branch we observe [10]. Poten- tially, the crossover in Hack’s law could be used as a determinant of hillslope scale, a crucial parameter in geo- morphology [61, 62]. However, when long, thin network structures are present in a network, this hillslope scale is masked by their contribution. Whether because of the hillslope scale or linear net- work structure, we see that at small scales, Hack’s law will show a crossover in scaling from h= 1 to a low- er exponent. The crossover’s position depends on the extent of linear basins in the network. For example, in the Kansas River basin, the crossover occurs when (l, a) = (4 ×103m,107m2). Since increased map resolu- tion can only increase measures of length, the crossover’s position must occur at least at such a length scale which may be many orders of magnitude greater than the scale of the map. However, the measurement of the area of such lin- ear basins will potentially grow with coarse-graining. Note that for the Mississippi mean-Hack distribution, the crossover begins around a= 106.5m2whereas for the Kansas, the crossover initiates near a= 105.5m2but the ends of the crossovers in both cases appear to agree, occurring at around a= 107m2. Continued coarse- graining will of course eventually destroy all statistics and introduce spurious deviations. Nevertheless, we see here that the deviation which would only be suggested in the Mississippi data is well confirmed in the finer-grain Kansas data. IX. DEVIATIONS AT INTERMEDIATE SCALES As basin area increases, we move out of the linear regime, observing a crossover to what would be consid- ered the normal scaling region of Hack’s law. We detail our attempts to measure the Hack exponents for the Kansas and Mississippi examples. Rather than relying solely on a single regression on a mean-Hack distribu- tion, we employ a more precise technique that examines the distribution’s derivative. As we will show, we will not be able to find a definite value for the Hack exponent in either case, an important result in our efforts to deter-mine whether or not river networks belong to specific universality classes. To determine h, we consider Hack’s law (equation (4)) explicitly in logarithmic coordinates, log10∝an}bracketle{tl(a)∝an}bracketri}ht= log10θ+hlog10a. (28) The derivative of this equation with respect to log10a then gives Hack’s exponent as a function of area, h(a) =d d log10alog10∝an}bracketle{tl(a)∝an}bracketri}ht. (29) We may think of h(a) as a “local Hack exponent.” Note that non-constant trends in h(a) indicate scaling does not hold. We calculate the discrete derivative as above for the Kansas and Mississippi. We smooth the data by taking running averages with varying window sizes of nsam- ples, the results for n= 32 being shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) where the spacing of log ais 0.02 orders of mag- nitude. Thus, the running averages for the figures are taken over corresponding area ranges 0.64 orders of mag- nitude. Now, if the scaling law in question is truly a scaling law, the above type of derivative will fluctuate around a constant value of exponent over several orders of mag- nitude. With increasing n, these fluctuations will neces- sarily decrease and we should see the derivative holding steady around the exponent’s value. At first glance, we notice considerable variation in h(a) for both data sets with the Kansas standing out. Fluctu- ations are reduced with increasing nbut we observe con- tinuous variation of the local Hack exponent with area. For the example of the Kansas, the linear regime and ensuing crossover appear as a steep rise followed by a drop and then another rise during all of which the local Hack exponent moves well below 1 /2. It is after these small scale fluctuations that we would expect to find Hack’s exponent. For the Kansas river data, we see the derivative gradually climbs for all values ofnbefore reaching the end of the intermediate regime where the putative scaling breaks down altogether. For the Kansas show in Figure 9(a), the dashed line represents h= 0.57, our estimate of Hack’s exponent from simple regression on the mean-Hack distribution of Figure 6(a). For the regression calculation, the interme- diate region was identified from the figure to be 107< a <1010m2. We see from the smoothed derivative in Figure 9(a) that the value h= 0.57 is not precise. After the crossover from the linear region has been complet- ed, we observe a slow rise from h≃0.54 to h≃0.63. Thus, the local Hack exponent h(a) gradually climbs above h= 0.57 rather than fluctuate around it. A similar slow change in h(a) is observed for the Missis- sippi data. We see in Figure 9(b) a gradual rise and then fall in h(a). The dashed line here represents h= 0.55, the value of which was determined from Figure 6(b) using regression on the range 109< a < 1011.5m2. The range ofh(a) is roughly [0 .52,0.58]. Again, while h= 0.5511 (a) 45678910110.30.40.50.60.70.8 log10ah (a ) (b) 67891011120.450.50.550.6 ah (a ) FIG. 9: Variation in Hack’s exponent for the Kansas, (a), and the Mississippi, (b). The area ais in m2. The plots are derivatives of the mean-Hack distributions given in Figures 6(a) and 6(b). Both derivatives have been smoothed by taking running averages over 0 .64 orders of magnitude in a. For the Kansas, the dashed line is set at h= 0.57, Hack’s exponent estimated via simple regression analysis for points with 107< a < 1010m2. The local exponent is seen to gradually rise through the h= 0.57 level indicating scaling is not robust. For the Mississippi in (b), the dashed line is a Hack exponent of 0.55 calculated from regression on data in the interval 109< a < 1011.5m2. The local Hack exponent is seen to gradually rise and fall about this value.approximates the derivative throughout this intermedi- ate range of Hack’s law, we cannot claim it to be a precise value. We observe the same drifts in h(a) in other datasets and for varying window size nof the running aver- age. The results suggest that we cannot assign specific Hack exponents to these river networks and are therefore unable to even consider what might be an appropriate universality class. The value of hobtained by regression analysis is clearly sensitive to the the range of aused. Furthermore, these results indicate that we should main- tain healthy reservations about the exact values of other reported exponents. X. DEVIATIONS AT LARGE SCALES We turn now to deviations from Hack’s law at large scales. As we move beyond the intermediate region of approximate scaling, fluctuations in h(a) begin to grow rapidly. This is clear on inspection of the derivatives of Hack’s law in Figures 9(a) and 9(b). There are two main factors conspiring to drive these fluctuations up. The first is that the number of samples of sub-basins with area adecays algebraically in a. This is just the observation that P(a)∝a−τas per equation (11). The second factor is that fluctuations in landaare on the order of the parameters themselves. This fol- lows from our generalization of Hack’s law which shows, for example, that the moments ∝an}bracketle{tlq∝an}bracketri}htofP(l|a) grow like aqh. Thus, the standard deviation grows like the mean: σ(l) = (∝an}bracketle{tl2∝an}bracketri}ht − ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}ht2)1/2∝ah∝ ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}ht. A Stream ordering and Horton’s laws So as to understand these large scale deviations from Hack’s law, we need to examine network structure in depth. One way to do this is by using Horton-Strahler stream ordering [38, 63] and a generalization of the well- known Horton’s laws [38, 64, 65, 39, 36]. This will natu- rally allow us to deal with the discrete nature of a network that is most apparent at large scales. Stream ordering discretizes a network into a set of stream segments (or, equivalently, a set of nested basins) by an iterative pruning. Source streams (i.e., those with- out tributaries) are designated as stream segments of order ω= 1. These are removed from the network and the new source streams are then labelled as order ω= 2 stream segments. The process is repeated until a single stream segment of order ω= Ω is left and the basin itself is defined to be of order Ω. Natural metrics for an ordered river network are nω, the number of order ωstream segments (or basins), ¯ aω, the average area of order ωbasins, ¯lω, the average main stream length of order ωbasins, and ¯l(s) ω, the aver- age length of order ωstream segments. Horton’s laws12 FIG. 10: Hack distribution for the Mississippi plotted in linear space. The area units ais 1012m2and length lis 106m. The discreteness of the basin structure is clearly indicated by the isolated, linear fragments. The inset is a blow-up of the box on the main graph. state that these quantities change regularly from order to order, i.e., nω nω+1=Rnand¯Xω+1 ¯Xω=RX, (30) where X=a,lorl(s). Note that all ratios are defined to be greater than unity since areas and lengths increase but number decreases. Also, there are only two independent ratios since Ra≡RnandRl≡Rl(s)[39]. Horton’s laws mean that stream-order quantities change exponentially with order. For example, (30) gives that lω∝(Rl)ω. B Discrete version of Hack’s law Returning to Hack’s law, we examine its large scale fluctuations with the help of stream ordering. We are interested in the size of these fluctuations and also how they might correlate with the overall shape of a basin. First, we note that the structure of the network at large scales is explicitly discrete. Figure 10 demonstrates this by plotting the distribution of ( a, l) without the usual logarithmic transformation. Hack’s law is seen to be composed of linear fragments. As explained above in Figure 8, areas and length increase in proportion to each other along streams where no major tributaries enter. Assoon as a stream does combine with a comparable one, a jump in drainage area occurs. Thus, we see in Figure 10 isolated linear segments which upon ending at a point (a1, l1) begin again at ( a1+a2, l1), i.e., the main stream length stays the same but the area is shifted. We consider a stream ordering version of Hack’s law given by the points (¯ aω,¯lω). The scaling of these data points is equivalent to scaling in the usual Hack’s law. Also, given Horton’s laws, it follows that h= lnRl/lnRn (using Ra≡Rn). Along the lines of the derivative we introduced to study intermediate scale fluctuations in equation (29), we have here an order-based difference: hω,ω−1=log¯lω/¯lω−1 log ¯aω/¯aω−1. (31) We can further extend this definition to differences between non-adjacent orders: hω,ω′=log¯lω/¯lω′ log ¯aω/¯aω′. (32) This type of difference, where ω′< ω, may be best thought of as a measure of trends rather than an approx- imate discrete derivative. Using these discrete differences, we examine two fea- tures of the order-based versions of Hack’s law. First we consider correlations between large scale deviations with - in an individual basin and second, correlations between overall deviations and basin shape. For the latter, we will also consider deviations as they move back into the intermediate scale. This will help to explain the gradual deviations from scaling we have observed at intermediate scales. Since deviations at large scales are reflective of only a few basins, we require an ensemble of basins to provide sufficient statistics. As an example of such an ensemble, we take the set of order Ω = 7 basins of the Mississippi basin. For the dataset used here where the overall basin itself is of order Ω = 11, we have 104 order Ω = 7 sub- basins. The Horton averages for these basins are ¯ a7≃ 16600 km2,¯l7≃350 km, and ¯L7≃210 km. For each basin, we first calculate the Horton averages (¯aω,¯lω). We then compute hω,ω−1, the Hack difference given in equation (31). To give a rough picture of what is observed, Figure 11 shows a scatter plot of hω,ω−1for all order Ω = 7 basins. Note the increase in fluctua- tions with increasing ω. This increase is qualitatively consistent with the smooth versions found in the single basin examples of Figures 9(a) and 9(b). In part, less self-averaging for larger ωresults in a greater spread in this discrete derivative. However, as we will show, these fluctuations are also correlated with fluctuations in basin shape.13 10610710810910100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8 aωhω,ω−1 FIG. 11: Differences of the stream order-based version of Hack’s law for 104 order Ω = 7 basins of the Mississippi (compare the continous versions given in Figure 9) The plots are overlaid to give a sense of the increase in fluctu- ations of the local Hack exponent hω,ω−1with increasing order ω. The clusters correspond to ω= 1,2, . . .,7, mov- ing across from left to right. C Effect of basin shape on Hack’s law In what follows, we extract two statistical measures of correlations between deviations in Hack’s law and overall basin shape. These are r, the standard linear correlation coefficient and rs, the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient [66, 67, 68]. For Nobservations of data pairs (ui, vi),ris defined to be r=/summationtextN i=1(ui−µu)(vi−µv) /summationtextN i=1(xi−µu)2/summationtextN i=1(yi−µv)2=C(u, v) σuσv,(33) where C(u, v) is the covariance of the ui’s and vi’s,µuand µvtheir means, and σuandσvtheir standard deviations. The value of Spearman’s rsis determined in the same way but for the uiandvireplaced by their ranks. From rs, we determine a two-sided significance psvia Student’s t-distribution [66]. We define κ, a measure of basin aspect ratio, as κ=L2/a. (34) Long and narrow basins correspond to κ≫1 while for short and wide basins, we have κ≪1 We now examine the discrete derivatives of Hack’s law in more detail. In order to discern correlations00.20.40.60.80.30.40.50.60.70.8 hΩ,Ω−1hΩ−1,Ω−2 FIG. 12: A comparison of the stream order Hack deriva- tiveshΩ,Ω−1andhΩ−1,Ω−2for each of the 104 order Ω = 7 basins of the Mississippi. The linear correlation coeffi- cient is r=−0.06 and the Spearman correlation coeffi- cient is rs=−0.08. The latter has probability ps= 0.43 indicating there are no significant correlations. between large scale fluctuations within individual basins, we specifically look at the last two differences in a basin: hΩ,Ω−1andhΩ−1,Ω−2. For each of the Mississippi’s 104 order Ω = 7 basins, these values are plotted against each other in Figure 12. Both our correlation measurements strongly suggest these differences are uncorrelated. The linear correlation coefficient is r=−0.06≃0 and, simi- larly, we have rs=−0.08≃0. The significance ps= 0.43 implies that the null hypothesis of uncorrelated data can- not be rejected. Thus, for Hack’s law in an individual basin, large scale fluctuations are seen to be uncorrelated. However, corre- lations between these fluctuations and other factors may still exist. This leads us to our second test which con- cerns the relationship between trends in Hack’s law and overall basin shape. Figure 13 shows a comparison of the aspect ratio κand h7,5for the order Ω = 7 basins of the Mississippi. The measured correlation coefficients are r= 0.50 and rs= 0.53, giving a significance of ps<10−8. Furthermore, we find the differences h7,6(r= 0.34,rs= 0.39 and ps<10−4) and h6,5(r= 0.35,rs= 0.34 and ps< 10−3) are individually correlated with basin shape. We observe this correlation between basin shape and trends in Hack’s law at large scales, namely hΩ,Ω−1,hΩ−1,Ω−2 andhΩ,Ω−2, repeatedly in our other data sets. In some cases, correlations extend further to hΩ−2,Ω−3.14 00.20.40.60.810.40.450.50.550.60.65 log10(κ = L2/a)h7,5 FIG. 13: Correlation between trends in Hack’s law and the aspect ratio of a basin as estimated by κ=L2/a. The data is for the order Ω = 7 basins of the Mississippi and the specific trend is h7,5. The correlation measurements giver= 0.50,rs= 0.53 and ps<10−8. Since the area ratio Rais typically in the range 4–5, Hack’s law is affected by boundary conditions set by the geometry of the overall basin down to sub-basins one to two orders of magnitude smaller in area than the over- all basin. These deviations are present regardless of the absolute size of the overall basin. Furthermore, the origin of the basin boundaries being geologic or chance or both is irrelevant—large scale deviations will still occur. How - ever, it is reasonable to suggest that particularly strong deviations are more likely the result of geologic structure rather than simple fluctuations. XI. CONCLUSION Hack’s law is a central relation in the study of river net- works and branching networks in general. We have shown Hack’s law to have a more complicated structure than is typically given attention. The starting generalization is to consider fluctuations around scaling. Using the direct- ed, random network model, a form for the Hack distribu- tion underlying Hack’s law may be postulated and rea- sonable agreement with real networks is observed. Ques- tions of the validity of the distribution aside, the Hack mean coefficient θand the Hack standard deviation coef- ficient ηshould be standard measurements because they provide further points of comparison between theory andother basins. With the idealized Hack distribution proposed, we may begin to understand deviations from its form. As with any scaling law pertaining to a physical system, cutoffs in scaling must exist and need to be understood. For small scales, we have identified the presence of linear sub-basins as the source of an initial linear relation between area and stream length. At large scales, statistical fluctuations and geologic boundaries give rise to basins whose overall shape produces deviations in Hack’s laws. Both devia- tions extend over a considerable range of areas as do the crossovers which link them to the region of intermediate scales, particularly the crossover from small scales. Finally, by focusing in detail on a few large-scale exam- ples networks, we have found evidence that river net- works do not belong to well defined universality classes. The relationship between basin area and stream length may be approximately, and in some cases very well, described by scaling laws but not exactly so. The gradual drift in exponents we observe suggests a more complicat- ed picture, one where subtle correlations between basin shape and geologic features are intrinsic to river network structure. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported in part by NSF grant EAR- 9706220 and the Department of Energy grant DE FG02- 99ER 15004. REFERENCES †Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Electronic address: dodds@segovia.mit.edu; URL: http://segovia. mit.edu/ ‡Electronic address: dan@segovia.mit.edu [1] R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabasi, Nature 401(6749), 130 (1999). [2] D. J. Watts and S. J. Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998). [3] M. Zamir, J. Theor. Biol. 197, 517 (1999). [4] S. N. Coppersmith, C.-h. Liu, S. Majumdar, O. Narayan, and T. A. Witten, Phys. Rev. E 53(5), 4673 (1996). [5] C. Cherniak, M. Changizi, and D. Kang, Phys. Rev. E59(5) (1999). [6] B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, San Francisco, 1983). [7] I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe and A. Rinaldo, Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization (Cambridge University Press, Great Britain, 1997). [8] A. Rinaldo, I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, and R. Rigon, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci 26, 289 (1998). [9] P. Ball, The Self-Made Tapestry (Oxford, UK, 1998).15 [10] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 28, 571 (2000). [11] J. T. Hack, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 294-B , 45 (1957). [12] A. Maritan, A. Rinaldo, R. Rigon, A. Giacometti, and I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, Phys. Rev. E 53(2), 1510 (1996). [13] R. Rigon, I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, A. Maritan, A. Gia- cometti, D. G. Tarboton, and A. Rinaldo, Water Resour. Res. 32(11), 3367 (1996). [14] H. Jaeger, S. Nagel, and R. Behringer, Rev. Mod. Phys.68(4), 1259 (1996). [15] L. Kadanoff, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71(1), 435 (1999). [16] T. R. Smith and F. P. Bretherton, Water Resour. Res.3(6), 1506 (1972). [17] S. Kramer and M. Marder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(2), 205 (1992). [18] N. Izumi and G. Parker, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 283, 341 (1995). [19] K. Sinclair and R. C. Ball, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(18), 3360 (1996). [20] J. R. Banavar, F. Colaiori, A. Flammini, A. Gia- cometti, A. Maritan, and A. Rinaldo, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4522 (1997). [21] E. Somfai and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. E 56(1), R5 (1997). [22] R. Pastor-Satorras and D. H. Rothman, Phys. Rev. Lett.80(19), 4349 (1998). [23] R. Pastor-Satorras and D. H. Rothman, J. Stat. Phys.93, 477 (1998). [24] M. Cieplak, A. Giacometti, A. Maritan, A. Rinal- do, I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, and J. R. Banavar, J. Stat. Phys.91(1/2), 1 (1998). [25] A. Giacometti, Local minimal energy landscapes in river networks (2000), preprint. [26] H. Takayasu and H. Inaoka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(7), 966 (1992). [27] R. L. Leheny, Phys. Rev. E 52(5), 5610 (1995). [28] G. Caldarelli, A. Giacometti, A. Maritan, I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, and A. Rinaldo, Phys. Rev. E 55(5), 4865 (1997). [29] C. P. Stark, Nature 352, 405 (1991). [30] T. Sun, P. Meakin, and T. Jøssang, Phys. Rev. E 49(6), 4865 (1994). [31] T. Sun, P. Meakin, and T. Jøssang, Phys. Rev. E 51(6), 5353 (1995). [32] L. B. Leopold and W. B. Langbein, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 500-A , 1 (1962). [33] A. E. Scheidegger, Bull. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. 12(1), 15 (1967). [34] S. S. Manna and B. Subramanian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(18), 3460 (1996). [35] A. Maritan, F. Colaiori, A. Flammini, M. Cieplak, and J. R. Banavar, Science 272, 984 (1996). [36] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Geometry of River Networks II: Distributions of Component Size and Number (2000), submitted to PRE. [37] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Geometry of RiverNetworks III: Characterization of Component Con- nectivity (2000), submitted to PRE. [38] R. E. Horton, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am 56(3), 275 (1945). [39] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Phys. Rev. E 59(5), 4865 (1999), cond-mat/9808244. [40] E. Tokunaga, Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido Univ. 15, 1 (1966). [41] E. Tokunaga, Geogr. Rep., Tokyo Metrop. Univ. 13, 1 (1978). [42] E. Tokunaga, Trans. Jpn. Geomorphol. Union 5(2), 71 (1984). [43] D. M. Gray, J. Geophys. Res. 66(4), 1215 (1961). [44] J. E. Mueller, Geological Society of America Bulletin 83, 3471 (1972). [45] M. P. Mosley and R. S. Parker, Geological Society of America Bulletin 84, 3123 (1973). [46] J. E. Mueller, Geological Society of America Bulletin 84, 3127 (1973). [47] D. R. Montgomery and W. E. Dietrich, Science 255, 826 (1992). [48] R. Rigon, I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, and A. Rinalod, Water Resour. Res. 34(11), 3181 (1998). [49] The topography used to extract areas and stream lengths is a composite of United States Geologi- cal Survey three-arc-second digital elevation models available on the Internet at www.usgs.gov . These datasets provide grids of elevation data with hor- izontal resolution on the order of 90 meters. The Kansas river was analyzed directly from the data while the Mississippi basin was studied on a coarse- grained version with horizontal resolution of approx- imately 1000 meters. [50] D. G. Tarboton, R. L. Bras, and I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, Water Resour. Res. 26(9), 2243 (1990). [51] H. Takayasu, I. Nishikawa, and H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. A 37(8), 3110 (1988). [52] P. Meakin, J. Feder, and T. Jøssang, Physica A 176, 409 (1991). [53] G. Huber, Physica A 170, 463 (1991). [54] D. Dhar and S. N. Majumdar, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.23, 4333 (1990). [55] D. Dhar, Physica A 186, 82 (1992). [56] D. Dhar, Physica A 263, 4 (1999). [57] W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , vol. I (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968), third ed. [58] W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , vol. II (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968), third ed. [59] The data for the Nile and Congo was obtained from the United States Geological Survey’s 30-arc-second Hydro1K dataset which may be accessed on the Internet at edcftp.cr.usgs.gov . Note that these Hydro1K datasets have undergone the extra process- ing of projection onto a uniform grid. [60] The dataset used for the Amazon has a horizontal resolution of approximately 1000 meters and comes from 30 arc second terrain data provided by the16 National Imagery and Mapping Agency available on the Internet at www.nima.mil . [61] W. Dietrich and D. Montgomery, in Scale Depen- dence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology , edited by G. Sposito (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1998), pp. 30–60. [62] W. E. Dietrich and T. Dunne, in Channel Network Hydrology , edited by K. Beven and M. Kirkby (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, 1993), chap. 7, pp. 175–219. [63] A. N. Strahler, EOS Trans. AGU 38(6), 913 (1957).[64] S. A. Schumm, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am 67, 597 (1956). [65] S. Peckham and V. Gupta, Water Resour. Res. 35(9), 2763 (1999). [66] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge University Press, 1992), second ed. [67] E. L. Lehman, Nonparametrics : statistical methods based on ranks (Holden-Day, San Francisoc, 1975). [68] P. Sprent, Applied Nonparametric Statistical Meth- ods(Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993), second ed.

arXiv:physics/0005048v1 [physics.geo-ph] 18 May 2000Geometry of River Networks II: Distributions of Component Size and Number Peter Sheridan Dodds∗ Department of Mathematics and Department of Earth, Atmosph eric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 0213 9. Daniel H. Rothman† Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 0213 9. (Dated: February 2, 2008) The structure of a river network may be seen as a discrete set o f nested sub-networks built out of individual stream segments. These network components ar e assigned an integral stream order via a hierarchical and discrete ordering method. Exponenti al relationships, known as Horton’s laws, between stream order and ensemble-averaged quantiti es pertaining to network components are observed. We extend these observations to incorporate fl uctuations and all higher moments by developing functional relationships between distribut ions. The relationships determined are drawn from a combination of theoretical analysis, analysis of real river networks including the Mississippi, Amazon and Nile, and numerical simulations on a model of directed, random networks. Underlying distributions of stream segment lengths are ide ntified as exponential. Combinations of these distributions form single-humped distributions wit h exponential tails, the sums of which are in turn shown to give power law distributions of stream lengt hs. Distributions of basin area and stream segment frequency are also addressed. The calculati ons identify a single length-scale as a measure of size fluctuations in network components. This art icle is the second in a series of three addressing the geometry of river networks. PACS numbers: 64.60.Ht, 92.40.Fb, 92.40.Gc, 68.70.+w I. INTRODUCTION Branching networks are an important category of all networks with river networks being a paradigmatic exam- ple. Probably as much as any other natural phenomena, river networks are a rich source of scaling laws [1, 2, 3]. Central quantities such as drainage basin area and stream lengths are reported to closely obey power-law statis- tics [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. The origin of this scaling has been attributed to a variety of mechanisms includ- ing, among others: principles of optimality [1, 9], self- organized criticality [10], invasion percolation [11], an d random fluctuations [3, 12, 13, 14]. One of the difficul- ties in establishing any theory is that the reported values of scaling exponents show some variation [6, 7, 15]. With this variation in mind, we have in [16] extensive- ly examined Hack’s law, the scaling relationship between basin shape and stream length. Such scaling laws are inherently broad-brushed in their descriptive content. In an effort to further improve comparisons between theo- ry and data and, more importantly, between networks themselves, we consider here a generalization of Horton’s laws [17, 18]. Defined fully in the following section, Hor- ton’s laws describe how average values of network param- eters change with a certain discrete renormalization of ∗Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Electro nic address: dodds@segovia.mit.edu; URL: http://segovia.mit.edu/ †Electronic address: dan@segovia.mit.eduthe network. The introduction of these laws by Horton may be seen as one of many examples that presaged the theory of fractal geometry [19]. In essence, they express the relative frequency and size of network components such as stream segments and drainage basins. Here, we extend Horton’s laws to functional relation- ships between probability distributions rather than sim- ply average values. The recent work of Peckham and Gupta was the first to address this natural generaliza- tion of Horton’s laws [20]. Our work agrees with their findings but goes further to characterize the distributions and develop theoretical links between the distributions of several different parameters. We also present empirical studies that reveal underlying scaling functions with a focus on fluctuations and further consider deviations due to finite-size effects. We examine continent-scale networks: the Mississippi, Amazon, Congo, Nile and Kansas river basins. As in [16], we also examine Scheidegger’s model of directed, random networks [13]. Both real and model networks provide important tests and motivations for our generalizations of Horton’s laws. We begin with definitions of stream ordering and Hor- ton’s laws. Thereafter, the paper is divided into two main sections. In Section III, we first sketch the theoretical generalization of Horton’s laws. Estimates of the Horton ratios are carried out in Section IV and these provide basic parameters of the generalized laws. Empirical evi- dence from real continent-scale networks is then provid- ed along with data from Scheidegger’s random network2 model in Section V. In Section VI we derive the high- er order moments for stream length distributions and in Section VII, we consider deviations from Horton’s laws for large basins. In the Appendix A, we expand on some of the connections outlined in Section V, presenting a number of mathematical considerations on these gener- alized Horton distributions. This paper is the second in a series of three on the geometry of river networks. In the first [16] we address issues of scaling and universality and provide further motivation for our general investigation. In the third article of the series [21] we extend the work of the present paper by examining how the detailed architecture of river networks, i.e., how network components fit together. II. STREAM ORDERING AND HORTON’S LAWS Stream ordering was first introduced by Horton in an effort to quantify the features of river networks [17]. The method was later improved by Strahler to give the present technique of Horton-Strahler stream order- ing [22]. Stream ordering is a method applicable to any field where branching, hierarchical networks are impor- tant. Indeed, much use of stream ordering has been made outside of the context of river networks, a good example being the study of venous and arterial blood networks in biology [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. We describe two conceptions of the method and then discuss empirical laws defined with in the context of stream ordering. A network’s constituent stream segments are ordered by an iterative pruning. An example of stream ordering for the Mississippi basin is shown in Figure 1. A source stream is defined as a section of stream that runs from a channel head to a junction with another stream (for an arboreal analogy, think of the leaves of a tree). These source streams are classified as the first order stream seg- ments of the network. Next, remove these source streams and identify the new source streams of the remaining net- work. These are the second order stream segments. The process is repeated until one stream segment is left of order Ω. The order of the network is then defined to be Ω. Once stream ordering on a network has been done, a number of natural quantities arise. These include nω, the number of basins (or equivalently stream segments) for a given order ω;∝an}bracketle{tlω∝an}bracketri}ht, the average main stream length; ∝an}bracketle{tl(s) ω∝an}bracketri}ht, the average stream segment length; ∝an}bracketle{taω∝an}bracketri}ht, the average basin area; and the variation in these numbers from order to order. Horton [17] and later Schumm [18] observed that the following ratios are generally indepen- dent of order ω: nω nω+1=Rn,∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}htω+1 ∝an}bracketle{tl∝an}bracketri}htω=Rl,and∝an}bracketle{ta∝an}bracketri}htω+1 ∝an}bracketle{ta∝an}bracketri}htω=Ra. (1) Since the main stream length averages ¯lωare combina-−105−100−95−90−8530323436384042444648 longitudelatitude ω = 11 10 9 8 FIG. 1: Stream segments for ω= 8 up to ω= Ω = 11 for the Mississippi River. The spherical coordinates of latitu de and longitude are used and the scale corresponds to roughly 2000 km along each axis. tions of stream segment lengths ¯lω=/summationtextω ν=1¯l(s) ωwe have that the Horton ratio for stream segment lengths Rl(s)is equivalent to Rl. Because our theory will start with the distributions of l(s), we will generally use the ratio Rl(s) in place of Rl. Horton’s laws have remained something of a mystery in geomorphology—the study of earth surface processes and form—due to their apparent robustness and hence perceived lack of physical (or geological) content. How- ever, statements that Horton’s laws are “statistically inevitable” [31], while possibly true, have not yet been based on reasonable assumptions [3]. Furthermore, many other scaling laws can be shown to follow in part from Horton’s laws [8]. Thus, Horton’s laws being without content would imply the same is true for those scaling laws that follow from them. Other sufficient assump- tions include uniform drainage density (i.e., networks are space-filling) and self-affinity of single channels. The lat- ter can be expressed as the relation [7, 32, 33, 34] l∝Ld /bardbl, (2) where L/bardblis the longitudinal diameter of a basin. Scaling relations may be derived and the set of relevant scaling exponents can be reduced to just two: das given above and the ratio ln Rl(s)/lnRn[8]. Note that one obtains Ra≡Rnso that only the two Horton ratios Rnand Rl(s)are independent. Horton ratios are thus of central importance in the full theory of scaling for river networks.3 III. POSTULATED FORM OF HORTON DISTRIBUTIONS Horton’s laws relate quantities which are indexed by a discrete set of numbers, namely the stream orders. They also algebraically relate mean quantities such as ¯aω. Hence we may consider a generalization to func- tional relationships between probability distributions. In other words, for stream lengths and drainage areas we can explore the relationships between probability distri- butions defined for each order. Furthermore, as we have noted, Horton’s laws can be used to derive power laws of continuous variables such as the probability distributions of drainage area aand main stream length l[7, 8, 35]: P(a)∝a−τand P(l)∝l−γ. (3) These derivations necessarily only give discrete points of power laws. In other words, the derivations give points as functions of the discrete stream order ωand are uniform- ly spaced logarithmically and we interpolate the power law from there. The distributions for stream lengths and areas must therefore have structures that when combined across orders produce smooth power laws. For the example of the stream segment length l(s) ω, Horton’s laws state that the mean ¯l(s) ωgrows by a factor ofRl(s)with each integer step in order ω. In considering P(l(s) ω, ω), the underlying probability distribution func- tion for l(s) ω, we postulate that Horton’s laws apply for every moment of the distribution and not just the mean. This generalization of Horton’s laws may be encapsulated in a statement about the distribution P(l(s) ω, ω) as P(l(s) ω, ω) =cl(s)(RnRl(s))−ωFl(s)(l(s) ωR−ω l(s)).(4) The factor of ( Rn)−ωindicates the that/integraltext∞ l(s)=0dl(s)P(l(s) ω, ω)∝(Rn)−ω, i.e., the frequency of stream segments of order ωdecays according to Horton’s law of stream number given in equation (1). Similarly, for lω,aωandnΩ,ω, we write P(lω, ω) =cl(RnRl(s))−ωFl(lωR−ω l(s)), (5) P(aω, ω) =ca(R2 n)−ωFa(aωR−ω n), (6) and P(nΩ,ω) =cn(Rn)Ω−ωFn(nΩ,ωR−ω n), (7) where constants cl(s),cl,caandcnare appropriate nor- malizations. We have used the subscripted versions of the lengths and areas, l(s) ω,lω, andaω, to reinforce that these parameters are for points at the outlets of order ωbasins only. The quantity nΩ,ωis the number of streams of order ωwithin a basin of order Ω. This will help with some notational issues later on. The form of the distributionfunctions Fl(s),Fl,FaandFnand their interrelationships become the focus of our investigations. Since scaling is inherent in each of these postulated generalizations of Horton’s laws, we will often refer to these distribution functions as scaling functions . We further postulate that distributions of stream seg- ment lengths are best approximated by exponential dis- tributions. Empirical evidence for this will be provided later on in Section V. The normalized scaling function Fl(s)(u) of equation (4) then has the form Fl(s)(u) =1 ξe−u/ξ=Fl(s)(u;ξ), (8) where we have introduced a new length scale ξand stated its appearance with the notation Fl(s)(u;ξ). The value of ξis potentially network dependent. As we will show, dis- tributions of main stream lengths, areas and stream num- ber are all dependent on ξand this is the only additional parameter necessary for their description. Note that ξis both the mean and standard deviation of Fl(s)(u;ξ), i.e., for exponential distributions, fluctuations of a variable are on the order of its mean value. We may therefore think of ξas afluctuation length scale . Note that the presence of exponential distributions indicates a random- ness in the physical distribution of streams themselves and this is largely the topic of our third paper [21]. Since main stream lengths are combinations of stream segment lengths, i.e. lω=/summationtextω i=1l(s) ω, we have that the distributions of main stream lengths of order ωbasins are approximated by convolutions of the stream segment length distributions. For this step, it is more appropriate to use conditional probabilities such as P(l(s) ω|ω) where the basin order ωis taken to be fixed. We thus write P(lω|ω) =P(l(s)1|1)∗P(l(s)2|2)∗ ···P(l(s) ω|ω).(9) where ∗denotes convolution. Details of the form obtained are given in Appendix A1. The next step takes us to the power law distribution for main stream lengths. Summing over all stream orders and integrating over u=lωwe have P(l)≃∞/summationdisplay ω=1/integraldisplay∞ u=lduP(u, ω), (10) where we have returned to the joint probability for this calculation. The integral over uis replaced by a sum when networks are considered on discrete lattices. Note that the probability of finding a main stream of length lis independent of any sort of stream ordering since it is defined on an unordered network. The details of this calculation may be found in Appendix A2 where it is shown that a power law P(l)∝l−γfollows from the deduced form of the P(lω, ω) with γ= lnRn/lnRl(s). IV. ESTIMATION OF HORTON RATIOS We now examine the usual Horton’s laws in order to estimate the Horton ratios. These ratios are seen as4 (a) (b) 123456789101101234567 ω1234567891011−7−6−5−4−3−2−10 ω FIG. 2: Horton’s laws for the order Ω = 11 Mississippi river basin network. For (a), the ordinate axis is logarithmic (ba se 10) representing number for stream number nω(circles), km2 for area ¯ aω(squares), and km for both main stream length ¯lω(triangles) and stream segment length ¯l(s) ω(diamonds). Note the good agreement between ¯lωand¯l(s) ω. In (b), the stream number data nω(circles) has been inverted from that in (a), i.e., the plot is of n−1 ω. This is compared with the dimensionless ¯ aω/¯aΩ(squares) showing good support for the prediction the slopes are equal, i.e., Ra≡Rn. intrinsic parameters in the probability distribution func - tions given above in equations (4), (5), (6) and (7). Figure 2(a) shows the stream order averages of l(s),l, aandnfor the Mississippi basin. Deviations from expo- nential trends of Horton’s laws are evident and indicated by deviations from straight lines on the semi-logarithmic axis. Such deviations are to be expected for the smallest and largest orders within a basin [8, 21]. For the small- est orders, the scale of the grid used becomes an issue but even with infinite resolution, the scaling of lengths, areas and number for low orders cannot all hold at the same time [8]. For large orders, the decrease in sample space contributes to these fluctuations since the number of samples of order ωstreams decays exponentially with order as ( Rn)Ω−ω. Furthermore, correlations with over- all basin shape provide another source of deviations [21]. Nevertheless, in our theoretical investigations below we will presume exact scaling. Note also that the equiva- lence of RnandRais supported by Figure 2(b) where the stream numbers nwhave been inverted for compari-ωrange RnRaRlRl(s)Ra/RnRl/Rl(s) [2,3] 5.27 5.26 2.48 2.30 1.00 1.07 [2,5] 4.86 4.96 2.42 2.31 1.02 1.05 [2,7] 4.77 4.88 2.40 2.31 1.02 1.04 [3,4] 4.72 4.91 2.41 2.34 1.04 1.03 [3,6] 4.70 4.83 2.40 2.35 1.03 1.03 [3,8] 4.60 4.79 2.38 2.34 1.04 1.02 [4,6] 4.69 4.81 2.40 2.36 1.02 1.02 [4,8] 4.57 4.77 2.38 2.34 1.05 1.01 [5,7] 4.68 4.83 2.36 2.29 1.03 1.03 [6,7] 4.63 4.76 2.30 2.16 1.03 1.07 [7,8] 4.16 4.67 2.41 2.56 1.12 0.94 mean µ4.69 4.85 2.40 2.33 1.04 1.03 std dev σ0.21 0.13 0.04 0.07 0.03 0.03 σ/µ 0.045 0.027 0.015 0.031 0.024 0.027 TABLE I: Horton ratios for the Mississippi River [36]. For each range of orders ( ω1, ω2), estimates of the ratios are obtained via simple regression analysis. For each quanti- ty, a mean µ, standard deviation σand normalized deviation σ/µare calculated. All ranges with 2 ≤ω1< ω2≤8 are used in these estimates but not all are shown The values obtained forRlare especially robust while some variation is observed for the estimates of RnandRa. Good agreement is observed between the ratios RnandRaand also between RlandRl(s). ωrange RnRaRlRl(s)Ra/RnRl/Rl(s) [2,3] 5.05 4.69 2.10 1.65 0.93 1.28 [2,5] 4.65 4.64 2.11 1.92 1.00 1.10 [2,7] 4.54 4.63 2.16 2.11 1.02 1.03 [3,4] 4.54 4.73 2.10 2.01 1.04 1.05 [3,6] 4.51 4.62 2.15 2.15 1.02 1.00 [3,8] 4.44 4.55 2.19 2.23 1.02 0.98 [4,6] 4.52 4.59 2.18 2.24 1.02 0.97 [4,8] 4.42 4.51 2.21 2.27 1.02 0.97 [5,7] 4.39 4.62 2.25 2.39 1.05 0.94 [6,7] 4.19 4.55 2.26 2.40 1.09 0.94 [7,8] 4.50 4.21 2.15 2.12 0.94 1.02 mean µ4.51 4.58 2.17 2.15 1.01 1.02 std dev σ0.17 0.12 0.05 0.19 0.03 0.08 σ/µ 0.038 0.026 0.024 0.089 0.034 0.078 TABLE II: Horton ratios for the Amazon [37]. Details are as per Table I. son. Similar agreement is found for the Amazon and Nile as shown in Tables I, II, and III which we now discuss. Table I shows the results of regression on the Missis- sippi data for various ranges of stream orders for stream number, area and lengths. Tables II and III show the same results carried out for the Amazon and Nile. Each table presents estimates of the four ratios Rn,Ra,Rl andRl(s). Also included are the comparisons Ra/Rnand Rl/Rl(s), both of which we expect to be close to unity. For each quantity, we calculate the mean µ, standard deviation σand normalized deviation σ/µ. Note the variation of exponents with choice of order range. This is the largest source of error in the calcula- tion of the Horton ratios. Therefore, rather than taking a5 ωrange RnRaRlRl(s)Ra/RnRl/Rl(s) [2,3] 4.78 4.71 2.47 2.08 0.99 1.19 [2,5] 4.55 4.58 2.32 2.12 1.01 1.10 [2,7] 4.42 4.53 2.24 2.10 1.02 1.07 [3,5] 4.45 4.52 2.26 2.14 1.01 1.06 [3,7] 4.35 4.49 2.20 2.10 1.03 1.05 [4,6] 4.38 4.54 2.22 2.18 1.03 1.02 [5,6] 4.38 4.62 2.22 2.21 1.06 1.00 [6,7] 4.08 4.27 2.05 1.83 1.05 1.12 mean µ4.42 4.53 2.25 2.10 1.02 1.07 std dev σ0.17 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.02 0.05 σ/µ 0.038 0.023 0.045 0.042 0.019 0.045 TABLE III: Horton ratios for the Nile [38]. Details are as per Table I. Here 2 ≤ω1< ω2≤7. single range of stream orders for the regression, we exam- ine a collection of ranges. Also, the deviations for high and low orders observed in Figures 2(a) and 2(b) do of course affect measurements of the Horton ratios. In all cases, we have avoided using data for the smallest and largest orders. For the three example networks given here, the state- ments Ra≡RnandRl≡Rl(s)are well supported. The majority of ranges give Rn/RaandRl/Rl(s)very close to unity. The averages are also close to one and are different from unity mostly by within 1.0 and uniformly by within 1.5 standard deviations. The normalized deviations, ie., σ/µ, for the four ratios are all below 0 .05. No systematic ordering of the σ/µis observed. Of all the data, the values for Rlin the case of the Mississippi are the most notably uniform having σ/µ= 0.015. Throughout there is a slight trend for regression on lower orders to overestimate and on higher orders to underestimate the average ratios, while reason- able consistency is found at intermediate orders. Thus, overall the ranges chosen in the tables give a reasonably even set of estimates of the Horton ratios and we will use these averages as our estimates of the ratios. V. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR HORTON DISTRIBUTIONS A. Stream segment length distributions We now present Horton distributions for the Mississip- pi, Amazon, and Nile river basins as well as the Schei- degger model. Scheidegger networks may be thought of as collections of random-walker streams and are ful- ly defined in [16] and extensively studied in [21]. The forms of all distributions are observed to be the same in the real data and in the model. The first distribution is shown in Figure 3(a). This is the probability density function of l(s)4, fourth order stream segment lengths, for the Mississippi River. Dis- tributions for different orders can be rescaled to show(a) 020406080−3−2.5−2−1.5−1−0.50 l slog10 P(l sω, ω) −7−6−5−4−3log10 Rnω−Ω Rl sω P(l sω, ω) FIG. 3: Plot (a) shows an example distribution of stream seg- ment lengths, P(l(s) ω, ω), for the Mississippi for order ω= 4. The lengths here are in kilometers. The semi-logarithmic ax es indicate the distribution is well approximated by an expo- nential. The value of the length scale ξ(see equation (8)) is estimated to be approximately 800 meters. Rescaled version s of the same stream segment length distributions for ω= 3 (circles), ω= 4 (squares), ω= 5 (triangles), and ω= 6 (dia- monds), are shown in (b). The rescaling is done according to equation (4). The values of the Horton ratios used are Rn= 4.69 and Rl(s)= 2.33 as determined from Table I satisfactory agreement. This is done using the postulat- ed Horton distribution of stream segment lengths given in equation (4). The rescaling is shown in Figure 3(b) and is for orders ω= 3, . . .,6. Note the effect of the exponential decrease in number of samples with order is evident for ω= 6 since P(l(s)6) is considerably scat- tered. Nevertheless, the figure shows the form of these distributions to be most closely approximated by expo- nentials. We observe similar exponential distributions fo r the Amazon, the Nile and the Scheidegger model. The fluctuation length scale ξis found to be approximately 800 meters for the Mississippi, 1600 meters for the Ama- zon and 1200 meters for the Nile. Since ξis based on the definition of stream ordering, comparisons of ξare only sensible for networks that are measured on topographies with the same resolution. The above values of ξare approximate and our confidence in them would be improved with higher resolution data. Nevertheless they do suggest that fluctuations in net- work structure increase as we move from the Mississippi through to the Nile and then the Amazon.6 (a) (b) 0 100 200 300−3.5−3−2.5−2−1.5−1 llog10 P(lω, ω) 0 2 4 6 8−6.5−6−5.5−5−4.5−4−3.5 l Rl−ωlog10 Rnω−Ω Rlω P(lω, ω) FIG. 4: Plot (a) shows an example distribution for order ω= 5 main stream lengths (measured in km) for the Ama- zon. The distribution is unimodal with what is a reasonable approximation of an exponential tail. In (b), distribution s of main stream length for for ω= 3 (circles), ω= 4 (squares), ω= 5 (triangles), and ω= 6 (diamonds), are rescaled accord- ing to equation (5). The values of the Horton ratios used here areRn= 4.51 and Rl(s)= 2.17, taken from Table II. B. Main stream segment length distributions The distributions of ω= 4 main stream lengths for the Amazon River is shown in Figure 4(a). Since main stream lengths are sums of stream segment lengths, their distribution has a single peak away from the origin. How- ever, these distributions will not tend towards a Gaus- sian because the individual stream length distributions do not satisfy the requirements of the central limit theo- rem [39]. This is because the moments of the stream seg- ment length distributions grow exponentially with stream order. As the semi-logarithmic axes indicate, the tail may be reasonably well (but not exactly) modeled by expo- nentials. There is some variation in the distribution tails from region to region. For example, corresponding dis- tributions for the Mississippi data do exhibit tails that are closer to exponentials. However, for the present work where we are attempting to characterize the basic forms of the Horton distributions, we consider these deviations to be of a higher order nature and belonging to the realm of further research. In accord with equation (5), Figure 4(b) shows the rescaling of the main stream length distributions for ω= 3, . . .,6. The ratios used, Rn= 4.49 and Rl= 2.19(≃Rl(s)= 2.17) are taken from Table II. Given(a) 05001000150020002500−5−4.5−4−3.5−3 llog10 P(lω, ω) 0−3−2.5−2−1.5−1−0.50log10 Rnω Rlω P(lω, ω) FIG. 5: Given in (a) is an example distribution of order ω= 6 main stream lengths for the Scheidegger model. The same form is observed as for real networks such as the Amazon (Figure 4). In the same way as Figure 4(b), (b) show rescaled distributions of main stream length for for ω= 4 (circles), ω= 5 (squares), ω= 6 (triangles), and ω= 7 (diamonds). Note that in (b), distributions are not normalized with respect t o a fixed basin order Ω and hence the vertical offset is arbitrary. The values of the ratios used here are Rn≃5.20 and Rl≃ 3.00 [8]. the scatter of the distributions, it is unreasonable to per- form minimization techniques on the rescaled data itself in order to estimate RnandRl. This is best done by examining means, as we have done, and higher order moments which we discuss below. Furthermore, varying RnandRlfrom the above values by, say, ±0.05 does not greatly distort the visual quality of the “data collapse.” Similar results for the Scheidegger model are shown in Figure 5. The Scheidegger model may be thought of as a network defined on a triangular lattice where at each lattice site one of two directions is chosen as the stream path [16, 21]. Figure 5(a) gives a single example distribu- tion for main stream lengths of order ω= 6 basins. The tail is exponential as per the real world data. Figure 5(b) shows a collapse of main stream length distributions for orders ω= 4 through 7. In contrast to the real data where an overall basin order is fixed (Ω), there is no max- imum basin order here. The distributions in Figure 5(b) have an arbitrary normalization meaning the absolute values of the ordinate are also arbitrary. Otherwise, this is the same collapse as given in equation (5). For the Scheidegger model, our simulations yield Rn≃5.20 and Rl(s)≃3.00 [8]. For all distributions, we observe similar functional forms for real networks and the Scheidegger7 (a) (b) 0 200 400 600−6.5−6−5.5−5−4.5−4 alog10 P(aω, ω) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2−8.5−8−7.5−7−6.5−6 a Rn−ωlog10 Rn2ω−Ω P(aω, ω) FIG. 6: The distribution of drainage areas for ω= 4 sub- basins of the Nile are shown in (a). All areas are measured in km2. An exponential tail is observed as per the distributions of stream segment length (Figure 3) and main stream length (Figure 4). In (b), distributions of drainage area for for ω= 3 (circles), ω= 4 (squares), ω= 5 (triangles), and ω= 6 (diamonds), are rescaled according to equation (6). The rescaling uses the estimate Rn= 4.42 found in Table III. model, the only difference lying in parameters such as the Horton ratios. C. Drainage area distributions Figure 6 shows more Horton distributions, this time for drainage area as calculated for the Nile river basin. In Figure 6, an example distribution for ω= 4 sub-basins is presented. The distribution is similar in form to those of main stream lengths of Figure 4, again showing a reason- ably clear exponential tail. Rescaled drainage area dis- tributions for ω= 3, . . .,6 are presented in Figure 6(b). The rescaling now follows equation (6). Note that if Rn andRawere not equivalent, the rescaling would be of the form P(aω, ω) =ca(RnRa)−ωFa(aωR−ω a). (11) Since we have asserted that Rn≡Ra, equation (11) reduces to equation (6). The Horton ratio used here is Rn= 4.42 which is in good agreement with Ra= 4.53, the respective standard deviations being 0 .17 and 0 .10. Both figures are taken from the data of Table III.0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5−3−2−1012 log10l FIG. 7: Summation of main stream length distributions for the Mississippi. Both axes are logarithmic,the unit of leng th is km and the vertical axis is probability density with units of km−1. Distributions of lωfor orders ω= 3 (circles), ω= 4 (squares), and ω= 5 (triangles), are shown. As expected, the distributions sum together to give a power law tail (stars). The power law distribution (which is vertically offset by an order of magnitude for clarity) is the summation of the dis- tributions below as well as the distribution for order ω= 6 main stream lengths. D. Summing distributions to form power laws As stated in Section III, the Horton distributions of aωandlωmust combine to form power law distributions foraandl(see equations 3 and 10). Figure 7 provides empirical support for this observation for the example main stream lengths of the Mississippi network. The distributions for ω= 3, 4 and 5 main stream lengths are individually shown. Their combination together with the distribution of l6gives the reasonable approximation of a power law as shown. The area distributions com- bine in the same way. Note that the distributions do not greatly overlap. Each point of the power law is therefore the addition of significant contributions from only two or three of the separate distributions. The challenge here then is to understand how rescaled versions of Fl, being the basic form of the P(lω, ω), fit together in such a clean fashion. The details of this connection are established in Appendix A2.8 E. Connecting distributions of number and area In considering the generalized Horton distributions for number and area, we observe two main points: a calcula- tion in the vein of what we are able to do for main stream lengths is difficult; and, the Horton distributions for area and number are equivalent. In principle, Horton area distributions may be derived from stream segment length distributions. This follows from an assumption of statistically uniform drainage den- sity which means that the typical drainage area drained per unit length of any stream is invariant in space. Apart from the possibility of changing with space which we will preclude by assumption, drainage density does naturally fluctuate as well [16]. Thus, we can write a≃ρ/summationtext ωl(s) ω where the sum is over all orders and all stream segments andρis the average drainage density. However, we need to know for an example basin, how many instances of each stream segment occur as a func- tion of order. For example, the number of first order streams in an order Ω basins is nΩ,1. Given the distri- bution of this number, we can then calculate the distri- bution of the total contribution of drainage area due to first order streams. But the distributions of nΩ,ωare not independent so we cannot proceed in this direction. We could potentially use the typical number of order ωstreams, ( Rn)Ω−ω. Then the distribution of total area drained due to order ωstreams would approach Gaussian because the individual distribution are identical and the central limit theorem would apply. However, because the fluctuations in total number of stream segments are so great, we lose too much information with this approach. Indeed, the distribution of area drained by order ωstream segments in a basin reflects variations in their number rather than length. Again, we meet up with the prob- lem of the numbers of distinct orders of stream segment lengths being dependent. One final way would be to use Tokunaga’s law [8, 40, 41, 42, 43]. Tokunaga’s law states that the number of order νside branches along an (absorbing) stream seg- ment of order µis given by Tk=T1(Rl(s))k+1. (12) where k=µ−ν. The parameter T1is the average num- ber of side streams having order ν=µ−1 for every order µabsorbing stream. This gives a picture of how a net- work fits together and may be seen to be equivalent to Horton’s laws [8]. Now, even though we also understand the distributions underlying Tokunaga’s law [16], similar technical problems arise. On descending into a network, we find the number of stream segments at each level to be dependent on all of the above. Nevertheless, we can understand the relationship between the distributions for area and number. What follows is a generalization of the finding that Rn≡Ra. The postulated forms for these distributions were giv- en in equations (6) and (7). Consider nΩ,1, the num-0 1 2 3 4 x 10400.20.40.60.811.2x 10−4 0123 x 10401234x 10−4 FIG. 8: Comparison of number and area distributions for the Scheidegger model. Area is in terms of lattice units. In the inset plot, the raw distributions shown are P(a6|6) (circles) andP(n6,1|6) (continuous line). The latter is the probability of finding n6,1source streams in an order ω= 6 basin. In the main plot, the number distribution has been rescaled to be 1/4P(n6,1|6) as a function of 4 n6,1and the area distribution is unrescaled (the symbols are the same as for the inset plot) . For the Scheidegger model, source streams occur at any site with probability of 1/4, hence the rescaling by a factor of fo ur. ber of first order streams in an order Ω basin. Assum- ing that, on average, first order streams are distributed evenly throughout a network, then this number is simply proportional to aΩ. As an example, Figure 8 shows data obtained for the Scheidegger model. For the Scheidegger model, first order streams are initiated with a 1 /4 proba- bility when the flow at the two upstream sites is randomly directed away, each with probability 1 /2. Thus, for an areaaΩ, we expect and find nΩ,ω=aΩ/4. For higher internal orders, we can apply a simple renormalization. Assuming a system with exact scaling, the number of streams nΩ,ωis statistically equivalent to nΩ−ω+1,1. Since the latter is proportional to aΩ−ω+1we have that nΩ,ω≃ρωaΩ−ω+1 (13) where the constant of proportionality is the density of order ωstreams, Clearly, this equivalence improves as number increases, i.e., the difference Ω −ωincreases. While we do not have exact forms for the area or num- ber distributions, we note that they are similar to the main stream length distributions. Since source streams9 1234567891011103104105106107 order ω< lω k >1/kMississippi: Horton moments k=1 3 5 7 9 FIG. 9: A comparison of moments calculated for main stream length distributions for the Mississippi River. are linear basins with the width of a grid cell, the dis- tribution of a1is the same as the distribution of l1and l(s)1, a pure exponential. Hence, nΩ,Ω−1is also an expo- nential. For increasing ω, the distribution of aωbecomes single peaked with an exponential tail, qualitatively the same as the main stream length distributions. VI. HIGHER ORDER MOMENTS Finally, we discuss the higher order moments for the generalized Horton distributions. Figure 9 presents moments for distributions of main stream lengths for the case of the Mississippi. These moments are calculated directly from the main stream length distributions. A regular logarithmic spacing is apparent in moments for orders ranging from 3 to 7. To see whether or not this is expected, we detail a few small calculations concerning moments starting from the exponential form of stream segment lengths given in equation (8). As noted previously, for an exponential distribution, Fl(s)(u) =ξ−1e−u/ξ, the mean is simply ∝an}bracketle{tu∝an}bracketri}ht=ξ. In general, the qth moment of an exponential distribution is ∝an}bracketle{tuq∝an}bracketri}ht=/integraldisplay∞ u=0uq ξe−u/ξdu =ξq/integraldisplay∞ x=0xqe−xdx=q!ξq. (14) Assuming scaling holds exactly for across all orders, the above is precisely ∝an}bracketle{t(l(s)1)q∝an}bracketri}ht. Note that ∝an}bracketle{t(l(s)1)q∝an}bracketri}ht=q!∝an}bracketle{tl(s)1∝an}bracketri}htq. Since the characteristic length of order ω streams is ( Rl(s))ω−1, we therefore have /angbracketleftBig (l(s) ω)q/angbracketrightBig =q!ξq(Rl(s))(ω−1)q=q!/angbracketleftBig l(s) ω/angbracketrightBigq .(15) Since main stream lengths are sums of stream segment lengths, so are their respective moments. Hence, ∝an}bracketle{t(lω)q∝an}bracketri}ht=ω/summationdisplay k=1/angbracketleftBig (l(s)k)q/angbracketrightBig , =ω/summationdisplay k=1q!ξq(Rl(s))(k−1)q, =q!ξqω/summationdisplay k=1(Rl(s))(k−1)q, =q!ξq(Rl(s))qω−1 Rl(s)−1. (16) We can now determine the log-space separation of moments of main stream length. Using Stirling’s approx- imation [44] that ln n!∼(n+ 1/2)lnn−nwe have ln∝an}bracketle{t(lω)q∝an}bracketri}ht ∼q/bracketleftBig ξ+ (Rl(s))ω+ lnq/bracketrightBig +C, (17) where Cis a constant. The ln qterm inside the square brackets in equation 17 creates small deviations from lin- earity for 1 ≤ω≤15. Thus, in agreement with Figure 9, we expect approximately linear growth of moments in log-space. VII. LIMITATIONS ON THE PREDICTIVE POWER OF HORTON’S LAWS In this last section, we briefly examine deviations from scaling within this generalized picture of Horton’s laws. The basic question is given an approximate scaling for quantities measured at intermediate stream orders, what can we say about the features of the overall basin? As noted in the previous section, all moments of the generalized Horton distributions grow exponentially with order. Coupling this with the fact that nω∝R−ω n, i.e., the number of samples of order ωbasins decreases expo- nentially with ω, we observe that a basin’s aandlwill potentially differ greatly from values predicted by Hor- ton’s laws. To illustrate this, Figure 10 specifically shows the dis- tributions P(l3) and P(l4) scaled up to give P(l11) for the Congo river. The actual Congo’s length measured at this 1000 meter resolution is represented by the sol- id line and is around 57% of the distribution’s mean as indicated by the dashed line. Nevertheless, we see that the measured length is within a standard deviation of the predicted value. In Table IV, we provide a comparison of predicted versus measured main stream lengths and areas for the10 0 1 2 3 x 10700.20.40.60.811.21.4x 10−7 lω RlΩ−ω (m)Rl−Ω+ω P(lω RlΩ−ω ) FIG. 10: Comparing the generalized Horton length distri- bution rescaled to the level of order Ω = 11 basins with the Congo River itself. The two distributions are for orders ω= 3 (squares) and ω= 4 (circles) stream lengths and the Horton ratio is estimated to be Rl= 2.39 [45]. The dashed line rep- resents the mean of these scaled up distributions while the solid line marks ¯l11, the measured length of the Congo at a 1000 meter resolution. The actual length is within a standar d deviation of the mean being around 50% of ¯l11. Table IV shows comparisons for various river networks for both area and length data. basin: lΩ¯lΩσllΩ/¯lΩσl/¯lΩaΩ¯aΩσaaΩ/¯aΩσa/¯aΩ Mississippi 4.92 11.10 5.60 0.44 0.51 2.74 7.55 5.58 0.36 0.74 Amazon 5.75 9.18 6.85 0.63 0.75 5.40 9.07 8.04 0.60 0.89 Nile 6.49 2.66 2.20 2.44 0.83 3.08 0.96 0.79 3.19 0.82 Congo 5.07 10.13 5.75 0.50 0.57 3.70 10.09 8.28 0.37 0.82 Kansas 1.07 2.37 1.74 0.45 0.73 0.14 0.49 0.42 0.28 0.86 TABLE IV: Comparison of predicted versus measured main stream lengths for large scale river networks. The dimensio ns of all lengths and areas are 106m and 1012m2respectively. Here, lΩ, is the actual main stream length of the basin, ¯lΩ the predicted mean value of lΩ,σlthe predicted variance and σl/¯lΩthe normalized deviation. The entries for the basin area data have corresponding definitions. basins studied here. The mean for the scaled up distribu- tions overestimates the actual values in all cases except for the Nile. Also, apart from the Nile, all values are within a standard deviation of the predicted mean. The coefficients of variation, σa/¯aΩandσl/¯lΩ, all indicate that fluctuations are on the order of the expected valuesof stream lengths and areas. Thus, we see that by using a probabilistic point of view, this generalized notion of Horton’s laws provides a way of discerning the strength of deviations about the expected mean. In general, stronger deviations would imply that geologic conditions play a more significant role in setting the structure of the network. VIII. CONCLUSION The objective of this work has been to explore the underlying distributions of river network quantities defined with stream ordering. We have shown that func- tional relationships generalize all cases of Horton’s laws . We have identified the basic forms of the distributions for stream segment lengths (exponential) and main stream lengths (convolutions of exponentials) and shown a link between number and area distributions. Data from the continent-scale networks of the Mississippi, Amazon, and Nile river basins as well as from Scheidegger’s model of directed random networks provide both agreement with and inspiration for the generalizations of Horton’s laws. Finally, we have identified a fluctuation length scale ξ which is a reinterpretation of what was previously iden- tified as only a mean value. We see the study of the generalized Horton distributions as integral to increas- ing our understanding of river network structure. We also suggest that practical network analysis be extended to measurements of distributions and the length scale ξ with the aim of refining our ability to distinguish and compare network structure. By taking account of fluctuations inherent in network scaling laws, we are able to see how measuring Horton’s laws on low-order networks is unavoidably problematic. Moreover, as we have observed, the measurement of the Horton ratios is in general a delicate operation suggesting that many previous measurements are not without error. The theoretical understanding of the growth and evolu- tion of river networks requires a more thorough approach to measurement and a concurrent improvement in the statistical description of river network geometry. The present consideration of a generalization of Horton’s laws is a necessary step in this process giving rise to stronger tests of both real and synthetic data. In the following paper [21], we round out this expanded picture of net- work structure by consdering the spatial distribution of network components. Acknowledgements The work was supported in part by NSF grant EAR- 9706220 and the Department of Energy grant DE FG02- 99ER 15004. The authors would like to express their gratitude to H. Cheng for enlightening and enabling dis- cussions.11 APPENDIX A: ANALYTIC CONNECTIONS BETWEEN STREAM LENGTH DISTRIBUTIONS In this appendix we consider a series of analytic cal- culations. These concern the connections between the distributions of stream segment lengths l(s) ω, ordered basin main stream lengths lωand main stream lengths l. We will idealize the problem in places, assuming per- fect scaling and infinite networks while making an occa- sional salubrious approximation. Also, we will treat the problem of lengths fully noting that derivations of dis- tributions for areas follow similar but more complicated lines. We begin by rescaling the form of stream segment length distributions P(l(s) ω, ω) = (Rn−1)(RnRl(s))−ωFl(s)(lR−ω l(s)).(A1) The normalization cl(s)=Rn−1 stems from the require- ment that /integraldisplay∞ u=0Fl(s)(u) = 1, (A2) which is made purely for aesthetic purposes. As we have suggested in equation (8) and demonstrated empirical support for, Fl(s)(u) is well approximated by the expo- nential distribution ξ−1e−u/ξ. For low uand also we have noted that deviations do of course occur but they are suf- ficiently insubstantial as to be negligible for a first order treatment of the problem. 1. Distributions of main stream lengths as a function of stream order We now derive a form for the distribution of main stream lengths P(lω|ω). As we have discussed, sincelω=/summationtextω i=1l(s) ω, we have the convolution (9). The right- hand side of equation (9) consists of exponentials as per equation (8) so we now consider the function Kω(u;/vector a) given by Kω(u;/vector a) =a1e−a1u∗a2e−a2u∗ ··· ∗ aωe−aωu,(A3) where /vector a= (a1, a2, . . . , a ω). We are specifically interested in the case when no two of the aiare equal, i.e., ai∝ne}ationslash=aj for all i∝ne}ationslash=j. To compute this ω-fold convolution, we simply examine the Kω(u;/vector a) forω= 2 and ω= 3 and identify the emerging pattern. For /vector a= (a1, a2) we have, omitting the prefactors for the time being, e−a1u∗e−a2u =e−a1u−e−a2u a1−a2=e−a1u a1−a2+e−a2u a2−a1(A4) providing a1∝ne}ationslash=a2. Convolving this with e−a3uwe obtain e−a1u∗e−a2u∗e−a3u=/parenleftbigge−a1u−e−a2u a1−a2/parenrightbigg ∗e−a3u, =e−a1u−e−a3u (a1−a2)(a1−a3)−e−a2u−e−a3u (a1−a2)(a2−a3), =e−a1u (a1−a2)(a1−a3)+ e−a2u (a2−a1)(a2−a3)+e−a3u (a3−a1)(a3−a2).(A5) Generalizing from this point, we obtain Kω(u;/vector a) =/parenleftBiggω/productdisplay i=1ai/parenrightBiggω/summationdisplay i=1e−aiu /producttextω j=1,j/negationslash=i(ai−aj).(A6) Now, setting ai= 1/(ξ(Rl(s))i−1) and carrying out some manipulations we obtain the following expression for P(lω, ω): P(lω, ω) =1 (Rn)ω1/producttextω j=1ξ(Rl(s))i−1ω/summationdisplay i=1e−lω/ξ(R l(s))i−1 /producttextω j=1,j/negationslash=i(1/ξ(Rl(s))i−1−1/ξ(Rl(s))j−1), =1 (Rn)ω1 ξω/producttextω j=1(Rl(s))j−1ω/summationdisplay i=1e−lω/ξ(R l(s))i−1 ξω−1/producttextω j=1,j/negationslash=i(Rl(s))i−1/producttextω j=1,j/negationslash=i(Rl(s))j−1 /producttextω j=1,j/negationslash=i(Rl(s))j−1−(Rl(s))i−1, =1 (Rn)ωξω−1 ξωω/summationdisplay i=1e−lω/ξ(R l(s))i−1(Rl(s))−2(i−1)/producttextω j=1(Rl(s))i−1/producttextω j=1(Rl(s))j−1/producttextω k=1(Rl(s))−(j−1) (Rl(s))−(ω−1)/producttextω j=1,j/negationslash=i(Rl(s))j−(Rl(s))i, =1 (Rn)ω1 ξω/summationdisplay i=1e−lω/ξ(R l(s))i−1(Rl(s))(i−1)(ω−2)(Rl(s))ω−2/Rl(s)/producttextω j=1,j/negationslash=i(Rl(s))j−(Rl(s))i, =1 (Rn)ω1 ξRl(s)ω/summationdisplay i=1e−lω/ξ(R l(s))i−1 (Rl(s))i(ω−2) /producttextω j=1,j/negationslash=i(Rl(s))j−(Rl(s))i(A7) Note that we have added in a factor of 1 /(Rn)ωfor the appropriate normalization. In addition, one observ es12 thatP(0, ω) = 0 for all ω >1 since all convolutions of pairs of exponentials vanish at the origin. Furthermore, the tail of the distribution is dominated by the exponen- tial corresponding to the largest stream segment. The next step is to connect to the power law distribu- tion of main stream lengths, P(l) (see Figure 7 and the accompanying discussion). On considering equation (10) we see that the problem can possibly be addressed with some form of asymptotic analysis. Before attacking this calculation however, we will sim- plify the notation keeping only the important details of theP(lω, ω). Our main interest is to see how equa- tion (10) gives rise to a power law. We transform the outcome of equation (A7) by using n=ω,u=lω/ξ, r=Rl(s), and s=Rn, neglecting multiplicative con- stants and then summing over stream orders to obtain G(u) =∞/summationdisplay n=11 snn/summationdisplay i=1r(n−2)ie−u/ri−1 /producttextn j=1,j/negationslash=i(rj−ri).(A8) The integration over lωhas been omitted meaning that the result will be a power law with one power lower than expected. 2. Power law distributions of main stream lengths We now show that this sum of exponentials G(u) in equation (A8) does in fact asymptotically tend to a power law. We first interchange the order of summation replac- ing/summationtext∞ n=1/summationtextn i=1with/summationtext∞ i=1/summationtextn n=ito give G(u) =∞/summationdisplay i=1e−u/ri−1∞/summationdisplay n=1r(n−2)i sn/producttextn j=1,j/negationslash=i(rj−ri), =∞/summationdisplay i=1Cie−u/ri−1. (A9) We thus simply have a sum of exponentials to contend with. The coefficients Ciappear unwieldy at first but do yield a simple expression after some algebra which we now perform: Ci=∞/summationdisplay n=1r(n−2)i sn/producttextn j=1,j/negationslash=i(rj−ri), =1/producttexti−1 j=1(rj−ri)∞/summationdisplay n=ir(n−2)i sn/producttextn j=i+1(rj−ri), =r(i−2)i /producttexti−1 j=1(rj−ri)1 si∞/summationdisplay n=isir(n−2)ir−(i−2)i sn/producttextn j=i+1(rj−ri), =1/producttexti−1 j=1r−i(rj−ri)r−i si∞/summationdisplay n=ir(n−i)i sn−i/producttextn j=i+1(rj−ri), =1/producttexti−1 j=1(rj−i−1)1 risi∞/summationdisplay n=i1/producttextn j=i+1sr−i(rj−ri),=1 risi1/producttexti−1 j=1(rj−i−1)∞/summationdisplay n=in/productdisplay j=i+11 s(rj−i−1), =1 risi1/producttexti−1 j=1(rj−i−1)∞/summationdisplay n=in/productdisplay j=i+11 s(rj−i−1), =1 risi/parenleftBigg −1/producttexti−1 k=1(1−r−k)/parenrightBigg/parenleftBigg∞/summationdisplay m=1m/productdisplay k=11 s(rk−1)/parenrightBigg .(A10) In reaching the last line we have shifted the indices in several places. In the last bracketed term we have set k=j−iand then m=n−iwhile in the first bracketed term, we have used −k=j−i. Immediately of note is that the last term is independent of iand may thus be ignored. The first bracketed term does depend on ibut con- verges rapidly. Writing Di=/producttexti−1 k=1(1−r−k) we have thatDi=Dm/producttexti−1 k=m(1−r−k). Taking mto be fixed and large enough such that 1 −r−kis approximated well by exp{−r−k}fork≥m, we then have Di=Dmexp/braceleftBiggi−1/summationdisplay k=m−r−k/bracerightBigg , =Dmexp/braceleftbiggr1−m (r−1)(1−1/ri−m−1)/bracerightbigg .(A11) Asi→ ∞,Diclearly approaches a product of Dmand a constant. Therefore, the first bracketed term in equa- tion (A10) may also be neglected in an asymptotic anal- ysis. Hence, as i→ ∞, the coefficients Ciare simply given by Ci∝1 siri. (A12) and we can approximate G(u) as, boldly using the equal- ity sign, G(u) =AS(u) =A∞/summationdisplay i=0e−u/ri ri(1+γ), (A13) where Acomprises the constant part of the Ciand factors picked up by shifting the lower limit of the index ifrom 1 to 0. We have also used here the identification s=rγ. (A14) We turn now to the asymptotic behavior of S(u), this being the final stretch of our analysis There are several directions one may take at this point. We will proceed by employing a transformation ofS(u) that is sometimes referred to as the Sommerfeld- Watson transformation and also as Watson’s lemma [46, p. 239]. Given a sum over any set of integers I, say S=/summationtext n∈If(n), it can be written as the following inte- gral S=1 2πi/contintegraldisplay Cπcosπz sinπzf(z)dz. (A15)13 where Cis a contour that contains the points on the real axisn+i0 where n∈Iand none of the points of the same form with n∈Z/I. Calculation of the residues of the simple poles of the integrand return us to the original sum. Applying the transformation to S(u) we obtain S(u) =1 2πi/contintegraldisplay Cπcosπz sinπze−ur−zr−z(1+γ)dz. (A16) The contour Cis represented in Figure 11./DE/BV/BE /BF /A0 /BD/BE/BC/A0 /BD /BD FIG. 11: Contour Cused for evaluation of the integral given in equation (A16). The poles are situated at n+ 0iwhere n∈ {0,1,2, . . .}. We first make a change of variables, r−z=ρ. Substi- tuting this and d z=−dρ/ρlnrinto equation (A16) we have S(u) =1 2πi/contintegraldisplay′ Cπcos−πlnρ/lnr sin−πlnρ/lnre−uρρ(1+γ)(−dρ/ρlnr) =1 2ilnr/contintegraldisplay′ Cπcosπlnρ/lnr sinπlnρ/lnre−uρργdρ. (A17) The transformed contour C′is depicted in Figure 12. Asu→ ∞, the contribution to integral from the neigh- borhood of ρ= 0 dominates. The introduction of the sin and cos terms has created an interesting oscillation that has to be handled with with some care. We now deform the integration contour C′into the contour C′′of Fig- ure 13 focusing on the interval along the imaginary axis [−i, i]. Choosing this path will simplify the cos and sin expressions which at present have logs in their arguments. The integral S(u) is now given by S(u)≃I(u) + c.c. where I(u) =−1 2ilnr/integraldisplayi 0πcosπlnρ/lnr sinπlnρ/lnre−uρργdρ.(A18) Writing ρ=σ+iτwithσ= 0, we have d ρ=idτand the following for the cos and sin terms: cosπlnρ/lnr=ρiπ/lnr+ρ−iπ/lnr 2, =τiπ/lnre−π2/2lnr+τ−iπ/lnreπ2/2 lnr 2,(A19) /BV /BC /AQ/D4/D6/BC FIG. 12: Contour C′used for evaluation of the integral given in equation (A17) as deduced from contour C(Figure 11) with the transformation ρ=r−z. The negative real axis is a branch cut./AQ/D4/D6/BC/A0 /CX /B7 /CX /BV /BC/BC FIG. 13: Contour C′′used for evaluation of the integral given in equation (A16). The poles are situated at n+ 0i where n∈ {0,1,2, . . .}. and sinπlnρ/lnr=ρiπ/lnr−ρ−iπ/lnr 2i, =τiπ/lnre−π2/2lnr−τ−iπ/lnreπ2/2 lnr 2i.(A20) The cot term in the integrand becomes cosπlnρ/lnr sinπlnρ/lnr=−i1 +τ2iπ/lnre−π2/lnr 1−τ2iπ/lnre−π2/lnr =−i1 +δ(τ) 1−δ(τ), (A21) where δ(τ) =τ2iπ/lnre−π2/lnr. The integral I(u) now becomes I(u) =i 2 lnr/integraldisplay1 01 +δ(τ) 1−δ(τ)e−iuττγeiπγ/2dτ14 =eiπ(1+γ)/2 2 lnr/integraldisplay1 0e−iuττγ1 +δ(τ) 1−δ(τ)dτ.(A22) Now, since |δ(τ)|=e−π2/lnr/lessorsimilar10−4(taking r=Rl(s)≈ 2.5), we can expand the expression as follows 1 +δ 1−δ= (1 + δ)(1 +δ+δ2+. . .) = 1 + 2 δ+ 2δ2+ 2δ3+. . . (A23) The integral in turn becomes I(u) =i1+γ 2 lnr/integraldisplay1 0dττγe−iuτ× /parenleftBig 1 + 2τ2iπ/lnre−π2/lnr+ 2τ4iπ/lnre−2π2/lnr+. . . + 2τ2niπ/lnre−nπ2/lnr+. . ./parenrightBig (A24) The basic n-th integral in this expansion is In(u) =/integraldisplay1 0τγ+2niπ/lnre−iuτdτ. (A25) Substituting uτ=wand replacing the upper limit w=u withw=∞we have In(u) =u−(1+γ+2niπ/lnr)/integraldisplay∞ 0dwwγ+2niπ/lnre−iw, = (iu)−(1+γ+2niπ/lnr)/integraldisplay∞ 0idw(iw)γ+2niπ/lnre−iw, = (iu)−(1+γ+2niπ/lnr)/integraldisplay∞ 0dv(v)γ+2niπ/lnre−v, = (iu)−(1+γ+2niπ/lnr)Γ(γ+ 2niπ/lnr). (A26) Here, we have rotated the contour along the imaginary iw-axis to the real v-axis and identified the integral with the gamma function Γ [44]. The integral can now be expressed as I(u) =1 2 lnru1+γ/bracketleftBigg 1 + 2∞/summationdisplay n=1u−2niπ/lnrΓ(γ+ 2niπ/lnr)/bracketrightBigg . (A27)We now need to show that the higher order terms are negligible. Note that their magnitudes do no vanish with increasing ubut instead are highly oscillatory terms. Using the asymptotic form of the Gamma function [47] Γ(z) =zz−1/2e−z√ 2π(1 +O(1/z)), (A28) we can estimate as follows for large nthat |Γ(1 + γ+ 2niπ/lnr)| ∼ |(2iπn/lnr+ 1 + γ)2iπn/lnr+1/2+γe−γ−1√ 2π| =|(eiπ/22πn/lnr)2iπn/lnr+1/2+γe−γ−1√ 2π| =e−π2n/lnrnγ+1/2(2π/e)1+γ(lnr)−1/2−γ.(A29) Hence, Γ(1 + γ+ 2niπ/lnr) vanishes exponentially with n. For the first few values of ntaking γ= 3/2 and r= 2.5, we have Γ(1 + γ+ 2iπ/lnr)≃2.5×10−3and Γ(1 + γ+ 4iπ/lnr)≃2.1×10−6showing that these corrections are negligible. Hence we are able estimate S(u) to first order as S(u)≃1 lnru−1−γ. (A30) Thus we have determined that a power law follows from the initial assumption that stream segment lengths follow exponential distributions. This equivalence has been drawn as an asymptotic one, albeit one where convergences have been shown to be rapid. The calculation is clearly not the entire picture as the solution does contain small rapidly-oscillating cor - rections that do not vanish with increasing argument. A possible remaining problem and one for further investi- gation is to understand how the distributions for main stream lengths lωfit together over a range that is not to be considered asymptotic. Nevertheless, the preceding is one attempt at demonstrating this rather intriguing breakup of a smooth power law into a discrete family of functions built up from one fundamental scaling function. [1] I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe and A. Rinaldo, Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Great Britain, 1997). [2] A. Rinaldo, I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, and R. Rigon, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci 26, 289 (1998). [3] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Annu. Rev. Earth Plan- et. Sci. 28, 571 (2000). [4] W. B. Langbein, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water-Supply Pap. W 0968-C , 125 (1947). [5] J. T. Hack, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 294-B , 45 (1957). [6] A. D. Abrahams, Water Resour. Res. 20(2), 161 (1984).[7] A. Maritan, A. Rinaldo, R. Rigon, A. Giacometti, and I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, Phys. Rev. E 53(2), 1510 (1996). [8] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Phys. Rev. E 59(5), 4865 (1999), cond-mat/9808244. [9] T. Sun, P. Meakin, and T. Jøssang, Phys. Rev. E 49(6), 4865 (1994). [10] A. Rinaldo, I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, R. Rigon, E. Ijjasz- Vasquez, and R. L. Bras, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70(6), 822 (1993). [11] C. P. Stark, Nature 352, 405 (1991). [12] L. B. Leopold and W. B. Langbein, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof.15 Pap.500-A , 1 (1962). [13] A. E. Scheidegger, Bull. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. 12(1), 15 (1967). [14] S. S. Manna, D. Dhar, and S. N. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. A46, 4471 (1992). [15] A. Maritan, F. Colaiori, A. Flammini, M. Cieplak, and J. R. Banavar, Science 272, 984 (1996). [16] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Geometry of River Net- works I: Scaling, Fluctuations, and Deviations (2000), submitted to PRE. [17] R. E. Horton, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am 56(3), 275 (1945). [18] S. A. Schumm, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am 67, 597 (1956). [19] B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Free- man, San Francisco, 1983). [20] S. Peckham and V. Gupta, Water Resour. Res. 35(9), 2763 (1999). [21] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Geometry of River Net- works III: Characterization of Component Connectivity (2000), submitted to PRE. [22] A. N. Strahler, EOS Trans. AGU 38(6), 913 (1957). [23] M. Zamir, S. M. Wrigley, and B. L. Langille, J. Gen. Physiol. 81, 325 (1983). [24] Y.-C. B. Fung, Biomechanics: motion, flow, stress, and growth (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990). [25] G. S. Kassab, C. A. Rider, T. N. J., and Y. B. Fung, Am. J. Physiol. 265, H350 (1993). [26] G. S. Kassab and Y.-C. B. Fung, Am. J. Physiol. 267, H319 (1994). [27] G. S. Kassab, D. H. Lin, and Y.-C. B. Fung, Am. J. Physiol. 267, H2100 (1994). [28] D. L. Turcotte, J. D. Pelletier, and W. I. Newman, J. Theor. Biol. 193, 577 (1998). [29] S. Aharinejad, W. Schreiner, and F. Neumann, Anat. Rec.251(1), 50 (1998). [30] M. Zamir, J. Theor. Biol. 197, 517 (1999). [31] J. W. Kirchner, Geology 21, 591 (1993). [32] D. G. Tarboton, R. L. Bras, and I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, Water Resour. Res. 24(8), 1317 (1988). [33] P. La Barbera and R. Rosso, Water Resour. Res. 25(4), 735 (1989). [34] D. G. Tarboton, R. L. Bras, and I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, Water Resour. Res. 26(9), 2243 (1990). [35] H. de Vries, T. Becker, and B. Eckhardt, Water Resour.Res.30(12), 3541 (1994). [36] The Misssissippi river network was extracted from a topography dataset composed of digital elevations mod- els obtained from the United States Geological Survey and are available on the Internet at www.usgs.gov . The dataset is decimated so as to have horizontal resolution of approximately 1000 meters leading to an order Ω = 11 network. [37] The topography dataset used for the Amazon was obtained from the website of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency ( www.nima.mil ). The dataset has a hor- izontal resolution of approximately 1000 meters yielding and order Ω = 11 network for the Amazon. [38] The data for the Nile comes from the United States Geo- logical Survey’s 30 arc second Hydro1K dataset, avaliable on the Internet at edcftp.cr.usgs.gov , which has a grid spacing of approximately 1000 meters. At this resolution, the Nile is an order Ω = 10 basin. [39] W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , vol. I (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968), third ed. [40] E. Tokunaga, Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido Univ. 15, 1 (1966). [41] E. Tokunaga, Geogr. Rep., Tokyo Metrop. Univ. 13, 1 (1978). [42] E. Tokunaga, Trans. Jpn. Geomorphol. Union 5(2), 71 (1984). [43] S. D. Peckham, Water Resour. Res. 31(4), 1023 (1995). [44] I. Gradshteyn and I. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994), fifth ed. [45] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Geometry of River Net- works II: Distributions of Component Size and Number (2000), submitted to PRE. [46] G. F. Carrier, M. Krook, and C. E. Pearson, Functions of a complex variable; theory and technique (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966). [47] C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced mathemat- ical methods for scientists and engineers , International series in pure and applied mathematics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978).

arXiv:physics/0005049v1 [physics.geo-ph] 18 May 2000Geometry of River Networks III: Characterization of Component Connectivity Peter Sheridan Dodds∗ Department of Mathematics and Department of Earth, Atmosph eric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 0213 9. Daniel H. Rothman† Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 0213 9. (Dated: February 2, 2008) River networks serve as a paradigmatic example of all branch ing networks. Essential to under- standing the overall structure of river networks is a knowle dge of their detailed architecture. Here we show that sub-branches are distributed exponentially in si ze and that they are randomly distribut- ed in space, thereby completely characterizing the most bas ic level of river network description. Specifically, an averaged view of network architecture is fir st provided by a proposed self-similarity statement about the scaling of drainage density, a local mea sure of stream concentration. This scal- ing of drainage density is shown to imply Tokunaga’s law, a de scription of the scaling of side branch abundance along a given stream, as well as a scaling law for st ream lengths. This establishes the scaling of the length scale associated with drainage densit y as the basic signature of self-similarity in river networks. We then consider fluctuations in drainage density and consequently the num- bers of side branches. Data is analyzed for the Mississippi R iver basin and a model of random directed networks. Numbers of side streams are found to foll ow exponential distributions as are stream lengths and inter-tributary distances along stream s. Finally, we derive the joint variation of side stream abundance with stream length, affording a full description of fluctuations in network structure. Fluctuations in side stream numbers are shown to be a direct result of fluctuations in stream lengths. This is the last paper in a series of three on t he geometry of river networks. PACS numbers: 64.60.Ht, 92.40.Fb, 92.40.Gc, 68.70.+w I. INTRODUCTION This is the last paper in a series of three on the geometry of river networks. In the first [1] we exam- ine in detail the description of river networks by scaling laws [2, 3, 4, 5] and the evidence for universality. Addi- tional introductory remarks concerning the motivation of the overall work are to found in this first paper. In the second article [6] we address distributions of the basic components of river networks, stream segments and sub- networks. Here, we provide an analysis complementary to the work of the second paper by establishing a descrip- tion of how river network components fit together. As before, we are motivated by the premise that while rela- tionships of mean quantities are primary in any investi- gation, the behavior of higher order moments potentially and often do encode significant information. Our purpose then is to investigate the distributions of quantities which describe the architecture of river networks. The goal is to quantify these distributions and, where this is not possible, to quantify fluctuations. In particular, we center our attention on Tokunaga’s law [7, 8, 9] which is a statement about network architec- ∗Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Electro nic address: dodds@segovia.mit.edu; URL: http://segovia.mit.edu/ †Electronic address: dan@segovia.mit.eduture describing the tributary structure of streams. Since Tokunaga’s law can be seen as the main part of a plat- form from which all other river network scaling laws fol- low [4], it is an obvious starting point for the investigatio n of fluctuations in river network structure. We use data from the Schediegger model of random networks [10] and the Mississippi river. We find the distributions obtained from these two disparate sources agree very well in form. We are able to write down scaling forms of all distribu- tions studied. We observe a number of distributions to be exponential, therefore requiring only one parameter for their description. As a result, we introduce a dimension- less scale ξt, finding it to be sufficient to describe the fluc- tuations present in Tokunaga’s law and thus potentially all river network scaling laws. Significantly, we observe the spatial distribution of stream segments to be random implying we have reached the most basic description of network architecture. Tokunaga’s law is also intimately connected with drainage density, ρ, a quantity which will be used throughout the paper. Drainage density is a measure of stream concentration or, equivalently, how a network fills space. We explore this connection in detail, showing how simple assumptions regarding drainage density lead to Tokunaga’s law. The paper is structured as follows. We first outline Horton-Strahler stream ordering which provides the nec- essary descriptive taxonomy for river network architec- ture. We then define Tokunaga’s law and introduce a2 scaling law for a specific form of drainage density. We briefly describe Horton’s laws for stream number and length and some simple variations. (Both stream order- ing and Horton’s laws are covered in more detail in [6]). We show that the scaling law of drainage density may be taken as an assumption from which all other scaling laws follow. We also briefly consider the variation of basin shapes (basin allometry) in the context of directedness. This brings us to the focal point of the paper, the identi- fication of a statistical generalization of Tokunaga’s law. We first examine distributions of numbers of tributaries (side streams) and compare these with distributions of stream segment lengths. We observe both distributions to be exponential leading to the notion that stream seg- ments are distributed randomly throughout a network. The presence of exponential distributions also leads to the introduction of the characteristic number ξtand the single length-scale ξl(s)∝ξt. We then study the variation of tributary spacing along streams so as to understand fluctuations in drainage density and again find the sig- nature of randomness. This leads us to develop a joint probability distribution connecting the length of a stream with the frequency of its side streams. II. DEFINITIONS A. Stream ordering Horton-Strahler stream ordering[11, 12] breaks a river network down into a set of stream segments . The method can be thought of as an iterative pruning. First, we define a source stream as the stream section that runs from a channel head to the first junction with another stream. These source streams are classified as the first- order stream segments of the network. Next, we remove all source streams and identify the new source streams of the remaining network. These are the network’s second- order stream segments. The process is repeated until one stream segment is left of order Ω. The order of the basin is then defined to be Ω (we will use the words basin and network interchangeably). In discussing network architecture, we will speak of side streams andabsorbing streams . A side stream is any stream that joins into a stream of higher order, the latter being the absorbing stream. We will denote the orders of absorbing and side streams by µandνbut when referring to an isolated stream or streams where their relative rank is ambiguous, we will write stream order as ω, subscripted as seems appealing. Central to our investigation of network architecture is stream segment length. As in [6], we denote this length by l(s) ωfor a stream segment of order ω. We will also introduce a number of closely related lengths which describe distances between side streams. When referring to streams throughout we will specifically mean stream segments of a particular order unless otherwise indicated. This is to avoid confusion with the natural definition of astream which is the path from a point on a network mov- ing upstream to the most distant source. For an order ω basin, we denote this main stream length bylω Note also that we consider river networks in planform, i.e., as networks projected onto the horizontal (or gravi- tationally flat) plane. This simplification poses no great concern for the analysis of large scale networks such as the Mississippi but must be considered in the context of drainage basins with significant relief. B. Tokunaga’s law Defining a stream ordering on a network allows for a number of well-defined measures of connectivity, stream lengths and drainage areas. Around a decade after the Strahler-improved stream ordering of Horton appeared, Tokunaga introduced the idea of measuring side stream statistics [7, 8, 9]. This technique arguably provides the most useful measurement based on stream ordering but has only recently received much attention [4, 13, 14, 15]. The idea is simply, for a given network, to count the average number of order νside streams entering an order µabsorbing stream. This gives ∝an}bracketle{tTµ,ν∝an}bracketri}ht, a set of double- indexed parameters for a basin. Note that Ω ≥µ > ν≥1, so we can view the Tokunaga ratios as a lower triangular matrix. An example for the Mississippi river is shown in Table I [30] The same data is represented pictorially in Figure 1 in what we refer to as a Tokunaga graph. ν= 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 µ= 2 1.7 34.9 1.3 4 12 3.8 1.1 5 29 9.1 2.9 1.0 6 71 23 7.7 3.0 1.2 7190 56 19 7.8 3.3 1.1 8380 110 39 17 6.9 2.6 1.0 9630 170 64 28 11 4.5 3.0 0.60 101100 270 66 29 13 4.3 2.7 1 1 111400 510 120 66 25 12 9 3 1 1 TABLE I: Tokunaga ratios for the Mississippi River. The row indices are the absorbing stream orders while the column s correspond to side stream orders. Each entry is the average number of order νside streams per order µabsorbing stream. Tokunaga made several key observations about these side stream ratios. The first is that because of the self- similar nature of river networks, the ∝an}bracketle{tTµ,ν∝an}bracketri}htshould not depend absolutely on either of µorνbut only on the relative difference, i.e., k=µ−ν. The second is that in changing the value of k=µ−ν, the∝an}bracketle{tTµ,ν∝an}bracketri}htmust them- selves change by a systematic ratio. These statements3 234567891011−0.50.51.52.5 µlog10 〈 Tµ,ν 〉ν=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FIG. 1: A Tokunaga graph for the Mississippi River. The values are given in Table I. Each point represents a Tokunaga ratio /angbracketleftTµ,ν/angbracketright. The solid lines follow variations in the order of the absorbing stream µwhile the dotted lines follow unit increments in both µandν, the order of side streams. In comparison, the Tokunaga graph of an exactly self-similar network would have points evenly spaced at ln T1+ (µ+ν− 1) lnRTwhere 1 ≤ν < µ = 2,3, . . . ,Ω, i.e., all lines in the plot would be straight and uniformly spaced, with the dotted lines being horizontal. The nature of deviations in scaling s laws for river networks is addressed in [1]. lead to Tokunaga’s law: ∝an}bracketle{tTµ,ν∝an}bracketri}ht=∝an}bracketle{tTk∝an}bracketri}ht=∝an}bracketle{tT1∝an}bracketri}ht(RT)k−1. (1) Thus, only two parameters are necessary to characterize the set of Tµ,ν:T1andRT. The parameter T1>0 is the average number of side streams of one order lower than the absorbing stream, typically on the order of 1.0–1.5. Since these side streams of one order less are the dominant side streams of the basin, their number estimates the basin’s breadth. In general, larger values of ∝an}bracketle{tT1∝an}bracketri}htcorrespond to wider basins while smaller values are in keeping with basins with rel- atively thinner profiles. The ratio RT>1 measures how the density of side streams of decreasing order increases. It is a measure of changing length scales and has a simple interpretation with respect to Horton’s laws which we describe below. Thus, already inherent in Tokunaga’s law is a generaliza- tion of drainage density ρ. the usual definition of which is given as follows. For a given region of landscape with area Awith streams totalling in length L,ρ=L/Aand has the dimensions of an inverse length scale [11]. One may think of ρas the inverse of the typical distance betweenstreams, i.e., the characteristic scale beyond which ero- sion cannot more finely dissect the landscape [11]. In principle, drainage density may vary from landscape to landscape and also throughout a single region. Below, we will turn this observation about Tokunaga’s law around to show that all river network scaling laws may be derived from an expanded notion of drainage density. Even though the number of side streams entering any absorbing stream must of course be an integer, Tokuna- ga’s ratios are under no similar obligation since they are averages. Nevertheless, Tokunaga’s law provides a good sense of the structure of a network albeit at a level of averages. One of our main objectives here is to go further and consider fluctuations about and the full distributions underlying the ∝an}bracketle{tTµ,ν∝an}bracketri}ht. Finally, a third important observation of Tokunaga is that two of Horton’s laws follow from Tokunaga’s law, which we next discuss. C. Horton’s laws We review Horton’s laws [4, 11, 16] and then show how self-similarity and drainage density lead to Tokuna- ga’s law, Horton’s laws and hence all other river network scaling laws. The relevant quantities for Horton’s relations are nω, the number of order ωstreams, and ∝an}bracketle{tlω∝an}bracketri}ht, the average main stream length (as opposed to stream segment length ∝an}bracketle{tl(s) ω∝an}bracketri}ht) of order ωbasins. The laws are simply that the ratio of these quantities from order to order remain con- stant: nω+1 nω= 1/Rnand∝an}bracketle{tlω+1∝an}bracketri}ht ∝an}bracketle{tlω∝an}bracketri}ht=Rl, (2) forω≥1. Note the definitions are chosen so that all ratios are greater than unity. The number of streams decreases with order while all areas and lengths grow. A similar law for basin areas [11, 16] states that ∝an}bracketle{taω+1∝an}bracketri}ht/∝an}bracketle{taω∝an}bracketri}ht=Rawhere ∝an}bracketle{taω∝an}bracketri}htis the average drainage area of an order ωbasin. However, with the assump- tion of uniform drainage density it can be shown that Rn≡Ra[4] so we are left with the two independent Horton laws of equation (2). As in [6], we consider another Horton-like law for stream segment lengths: /angbracketleftBig l(s) ω+1/angbracketrightBig /angbracketleftBig l(s) ω/angbracketrightBig=Rl(s). (3) As we will show, the form of the distribution of the vari- ableTµ,νis a direct consequence of the distribution of l(s) ω. Tokunaga showed that Horton’s laws of stream num- ber and stream length follow from what we have called Tokunaga’s law, equation (1). For example, the solu- tion of a difference equation relating the nωand the Tk4 leads to the result Rn=AT+/bracketleftbig A2 T−2RT/bracketrightbig1/2where AT= (2 + RT+T1)/2 for Ω = ∞and a more com- plicated expression is obtained for finite Ω [4, 8, 9, 15]. In keeping with our previous remarks on T1, this expres- sion for Rnshows that an increase in T1will increase Rn which, since Ra≡Rn, corresponds to a network where basins tend to be relatively broader. Our considerations will expand significantly on this connection between the network descriptions of Horton and Tokunaga. III. THE IMPLICATIONS OF A SCALING LAW FOR DRAINAGE DENSITY We now introduce a law for drainage density based on stream ordering. We write ρµ,νfor the number of side streams of order νper unit length of order µabsorbing stream. We expect these densities to be independent of the order of the absorbing stream and so we will gener- ally use ρν. The typical length separating order νside streams is then 1 /ρν. Assuming self-similarity of river networks, we must have ρν+1/ρν= 1/Rρ (4) where Rρ>1 independent of ν. All river network scaling laws in the planform may be seen to follow from this relationship. Consider an absorbing stream of order µ. Self-similarity immediately demands that the number of side streams of order µ−1 must be statistically independent of µ. This number is of course ∝an}bracketle{tT1∝an}bracketri}ht. Therefore, the typical length of an order µabsorbing stream must be /angbracketleftBig l(s) µ/angbracketrightBig =∝an}bracketle{tT1∝an}bracketri}ht/ρµ−1. (5) Using equation (4) to replace ρµ−1in the above equation, we find T1/ρµ−1=RρT1/ρµ−2. (6) Thus, T2=RρT1and, in general Tk= (Rρ)k−1T1. This is Tokunaga’s law and we therefore have Rρ≡RT. (7) Equation (4) and equation (5) also give /angbracketleftBig l(s) µ/angbracketrightBig =T1/ρµ−1=RρT1/ρµ−2=Rρ/angbracketleftBig l(s) µ−1/angbracketrightBig .(8) On comparison with equation (3), we see that the above is our Hortonian law of stream segment lengths and that Rρ≡Rl(s). (9) AsRl(s)is the basic length-scale ratio in the problem, we rewrite equation (4), our Hortonian law of drainage density, as ρν+1/ρν= 1/Rl(s). (10) The above statement becomes our definition of the self- similarity of drainage density.IV. BASIN ALLOMETRY Given that we have suggested the need for only a sin- gle relevant length ratio, we must remark here on basin allometry. Allometry refers to the relative growth or scal- ing of a shape’s dimensions and was originally introduced in the context of biology [17]. A growth or change being allometric usually implies it is not self-similar. A long- standing issue in the study of river networks has been whether or not basins are allometric [3, 5, 18]. Consider two basins described by ( L1, W1) and (L2, W2) within the same system where Liis a char- acteristic longitudinal basin length and Wia charac- teristic width. The basins being allometric means that (W1/W2) = (L1/L2)Hwhere H <1. Thus, two length ratios are needed to describe the allometry of basins. If we consider basins defined by stream ordering then we have the Horton-like ratios RLandRW=RH L. Now, when rescaling an entire basin, streams roughly aligned with a basin’s length will rescale with the factor RL and those perpendicular to the basin’s axis will rescale differently with RW. This creates a conundrum: how can basins be allometric ( RL∝ne}ationslash=RW) and yet individual streams be self-similar ( RL=RW) as implied by Hor- ton’s laws? We contend the answer is that allometry must be restricted to directed networks and that self-similarity of basins must hold for non-directed networks . This is in agreement with Colaiori et al. [19] who also distinguish between self-similar and allometric river basins although we stress here the qualification of directedness. Direct- ed networks have a global direction of flow in which the direction of each individual stream flow has a positive component. A basic example is the random model of Scheidegger [10] which we describe below. For a direct- ed network, RL=Rl, and the rescaling of basin sizes matches up with the rescaling of stream lengths regard- less of how the basin’s width rescales since all streams are on average aligned with the global direction of flow. Hence, our premise that streams rescale in a self-similar way is general enough to deal with systems whose basins rescale in an allometric fashion. In considering the allometry of basins, we must also address the additional possibility that individual stream lengths may scale non-trivially with basin length. In this case, the main stream length lwould vary with the lon- gitudinal basin length Lasl∝Ld. This is typically a weak dependence with 1 .0< d < 1.15 [2, 20]. Note that Horton’s laws still apply in this case. The exponent d plays a part in determining whether or not a basin scales allometrically. The exponent Hintroduced in the discus- sion of basin allometry can be found in terms of Horton’s ratios (or equivalently Tokunaga’s parameters) and das H=dlnRn/lnRl−1 [4]. Thus, for a directed network d= 1 and H≤1 (e.g., Scheidegger [10]) whereas for undirected, self-similar ne t- works H= 1 and d≥1 (e.g., random undirected net- works [21, 22]). River networks are in practice often nei-5 ther fully directed or undirected. Scaling laws observed in such cases will show deviations from pure scaling that may well be gradual and difficult to detect [1]. V. TOKUNAGA DISTRIBUTIONS The laws of Tokunaga and Horton relate averages of quantities. In the remainder of this paper, we investigate the underlying distributions from which these averages are made. We are able to find general scaling forms of a number of distributions and in many cases also identify the basic form of the relevant scaling function. FIG. 2: Scheidegger’s random directed networks. Sites are arranged on a triangular lattice and stream flow is directed down the page. At each site, the flow direction is randomly chosen to be in one of the directions shown on the left. The dashed box indicates the area “drained” by the local site. To aid and motivate our investigations, we examine, as we have done in both [1] and [6], a simple model of directed random networks that was first introduced by Scheidegger [10] Since we make much of use this model in the present work, we provide a self-contained discussion. Consider the triangular lattice of sites oriented as in Fig- ure 2. At each site of the lattice a stream flow direction is randomly chosen between the two possible diagonal directions shown. It is therefore trivial to generate the model on a large scale, allowing for a thorough investi- gation of its river network statistics. The small, tilted box with a dashed boundary represents the area drained by the enclosed site. As with many discrete-space mod- els, the details of the underlying lattice are unimportant. On a square lattice, the model’s streams would have three choices of flow, two diagonals and straight down the page. However, the choice of a triangular lattice does simplify implementation and calculation of statistics. For exam- ple, only one tributary can exist at each site along a stream and stream paths and basin boundaries are pre- cisely those of the usual discrete-space random walk [23]. Since random walks are well understood, the exponents of many river network scaling laws are exactly known for the Scheidegger model [24, 25, 26, 27] and analogies may also be drawn with the Abelian sandpile model [28]. For example, a basin’s boundaries being random walksmeans that a basin of length Lwill typically have a width W∝L1/2which gives H= 1/2. Since the network is directed, stream length is the same as basin length, l=L, so we trivially have d= 1. Basin area ais estimated by WL∝L3/2∝l3/2sol∝a2/3giving Hack’s law with an exponent of 2 /3 [18]. Nevertheless, the Tokunaga parameters and the Hor- ton ratios are not known analytically. Estimates from previous work [4] find T1≃1.35,Rl=RT≃3.00 and Rn≃5.20. Data for the present analysis was obtained on L= 104byW= 3×103lattices with periodic boundaries. Given the self-averaging present in any single instance on these networks, ensembles of 10 were deemed sufficient. We first examine the distributions of Tokunaga ratios Tµ,νand observe a strong link to the underlying distribu- tion of l(s) µ. Both are well described by exponential dis- tributions. To understand this link, we next consider the distances between neighboring side streams of like order. This provides a measure of fluctuations in drainage den- sity and again, exponential distributions appear. We are then in a position to develop theory for the joint probabil- ity distribution between the Tokunaga ratios and stream segment lengths and, as a result, the distribution for the quantity Tµ,ν/l(s) µand its inverse. In the limit of large µ, theTµ,νare effectively proportional to l(s) µand all fluc- tuations of the former exactly follow those of the latter. All investigations are initially carried out for the Schei- degger model where we may generate statistics of ever- improving quality. We find the same forms for all distri- butions for the Mississippi data (and for other river net- works not presented here) and provide some pertinent examples. Perhaps the most significant benefit of the simple Scheidegger model is its ability to provide clean distributions whose form we can then search for in real data. Figure 3 shows the distribution of the number of order ν= 2 side streams entering an order µ= 6 absorbing stream for the Scheidegger model. At first, it may seem surprising that this is not a single-peaked distribution centered around ∝an}bracketle{tTµ,ν∝an}bracketri}htdying off for small and large val- ues of Tµ,ν. The distribution of Tµ,νin Figure 3 is clearly well described by an exponential distribution. This can also be seen upon inspection of Figures 4(a) and 4(b). Fig- ure 4(a) shows normalized distributions of Tµ,νforν= 2 and varying absorbing stream order µ= 4, 5 and 6. These distributions (plus the one for absorbing stream order µ= 7) are rescaled and presented in Figure 4(b). The single form thus obtained suggests a scaling form of theTµ,νdistribution is given by P(Tµ,ν) = (Rl(s))−µF/bracketleftbig Tµ,ν(Rl(s))−µ/bracketrightbig . (11) where Fis an exponential scaling function. However, this only accounts for variations in µ, the order of the absorbing stream. Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show that a similar rescaling of the distributions may be effected when νis varied. In this6 0 100 200 300−4.5−4−3.5−3−2.5−2−1.5 Tµ,νlog10P(Tµ,ν ) FIG. 3: An example of a generalized Tokunaga distribu- tion for the Scheidegger model. The Tokunaga ratio Tµ,νis the number of side streams of order νentering an absorbing stream of order µ. For this particular example µ= 6 and ν= 2. The form is exponential and is a result of variations in stream segment length rather than significant fluctuation s in side stream density. case, the data is for the Mississippi. The rescaling is now byRl(s)rather than R−1 l(s)and equation (11) is improved to give P(Tµ,ν) = (Rl(s))µ−ν−1PT/bracketleftbig Tµ,ν/(Rl(s))µ−ν−1/bracketrightbig .(12) The function PTis a normalized exponential distribution independent of µandν, PT(z) =1 ξte−z/ξt, (13) where ξtis the characteristic number of side streams of one order lower than the absorbing stream, i.e., ξt= ∝an}bracketle{tT1∝an}bracketri}ht. For the Mississippi, we observe ξt≃1.1 whereas for the Scheidegger model, ξt≃1.35. As expected, the Tokunaga distribution is dependent only on k=µ−νso we can write P(Tk) = (Rl(s))k−1PT/bracketleftbig Tµ,ν/(Rl(s))k−1/bracketrightbig .(14) withPTas above. VI. DISTRIBUTIONS OF STREAM SEGMENT LENGTHS AND RANDOMNESS As we have suggested, the distributions of the Tokuna- ga ratios depend strongly on the distributions of stream(a) 0 100 200 300−5−4−3−2−1 Tµ,νlog10P(Tµ,ν ) 0−3−2−101log10(Rl (s) )µ P(Tµ,ν ) FIG. 4: Distributions for Tokunaga ratios for varying order s of absorbing stream and fixed side stream order of ν= 2 for the Scheidegger network. In (a), examples of Tµ,νdis- tributions for absorbing stream order µ= 4 (circles), µ= 5 (squares) and µ= 6 (triangles). In (b), these distributions, as well as the µ= 7 case, are rescaled according to equation (11). The resulting “data collapse” gives a single distribution. For the Scheidegger model, Rl(s)≃3.00. segment lengths. Figure 6 is the indicates why this is so. The form of the underlying distribution is itself exponen- tial. We have already examined this fact extensively in [6] and here we develop its relationship with the Tokunaga distributions. Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show that the distributions of l(s) µcan be rescaled in the same way as the Tokunaga distributions. Thus, we write the distribution for stream segment lengths as [6] P(l(s) µ) = (Rl(s))−µ+1Pl(s)/bracketleftBig l(s) µ/(Rl(s))−µ+1/bracketrightBig .(15) As for PT, the function Pl(s)is a normalized exponential distribution Pl(s)(z) =1 ξl(s)e−z/ξl(s), (16) where, in a strictly self-similar network, ξl(s)is the charac- teristic length of first-order stream segments, i.e., ξl(s)= ∝an}bracketle{tl(s) 1∝an}bracketri}ht. (Note that in [6] we use ξforξl(s)for ease of notation). We qualify this by requiring the network to be exactly self-similar because in most models and all real networks this is certainly not the case. As should be expected, there are deviations from scaling for the largest7 (a) (b) 020406080100100101102103 Tokunaga ratio Tµ,νfrequency P(Tµ,ν )Mississippi ν=2 ν=3 ν=4µ = 5 0 2 4 6 8100101102103104 Tµ,ν (Rl)νP(Tµ,ν ) / (Rl )νMississippi ν=2 ν=3 ν=4µ = 5 FIG. 5: Tokunaga distributions for varying side stream orders for the Mississippi river basin. In both (a) and (b), t he absorbing stream order is µ= 5 and the side stream orders areν= 2 (circles), ν= 3 (squares) and ν= 4 (triangles). The raw distributions are shown in (a). In (b) the distribu- tions are rescaled as per equation (12). For the Mississippi , the ratio is estimated to be Rl(s)≃2.40 [6]. and smallest orders. Therefore, ξl(s)is the characteristic size of a first-order stream as determined by scaling down the average lengths of those higher order streams that are in the self-similar structure of the network. It is thus in general different from ∝an}bracketle{tl(s) 1∝an}bracketri}ht. We therefore see that the distributions of Tµ,νandl(s) µ are both exponential in form. Variations in l(s) µlargely govern the possible values of the Tµ,ν. However, Tµ,ν is still only proportional to l(s) µon average and later on we will explore the joint distribution from which these individual exponentials arise. The connection between the characteristic number ξt and the length-scale ξl(s)follows from equations (3), (5), and (10): ξt=ρ1Rl(s)ξl(s). (17) This presumes exact scaling of drainage densities and in the case where this is not so, ρ1would be chosen so that (Rl(s))ν−1ρ1most closely approximates the higher order ρν. We come to an important interpretation of the expo- nential distribution as a composition of independent probabilities. Consider the example of stream segment lengths. We write ˜ pµas the probability that a stream(a) 0 1000 2000 3000−6−5−4−3−2 lω (s)log10 P(lω (s) ) 0−4−3−2−10log10(Rl (s) )ω P(lω (s)) FIG. 6: Stream segment length distributions for varying stream order for the Scheidegger model. Lengths are in units the lattice spacing. Shown in (a) are raw distributions for ω= 4 (circles), ω= 5 (squares) and ω= 6. The linear forms on the semilogarithmic axes indication these distributions are w ell approximated by exponentials [6]. In (b), the distribution s in (a) plus the distribution for l(s) 7(diamonds) are rescaled using equation (15). segment of order µmeets with (and thereby terminates at) a stream of order at least µ. For simplicity, we assume only one side stream or none may join a stream at any site. We also take the lattice spacing αto be unity so that stream lengths are integers and therefore equate with the number of links between sites along a stream. For α∝ne}ationslash= 1, derivations similar to below will apply with l(s) µreplaced by [l(s) µ/α], where [ ·] denotes rounding to the nearest integer. Note that extra complications arise when the distances between neighboring sites are not uniform. Consider a single instance of an order µstream seg- ment. The probability of this segment having a length l(s) µis given by P(l(s) µ) = ˜pµ(1−˜pµ)l(s) µ. (18) where ˜ pµis the probability that an order an order µ stream segment terminates on meeting a stream of equal or higher order. We can re-express the above equation as P(l(s) µ)≃˜pµexp{−l(s) µln(1−˜pµ)−1}, (19) and upon inspection of equations (15) and (16) we make the identification (Rl(s))µ−1ξl(s)= [−ln(1−˜pµ)]−1, (20)8 050100150200−5−4.5−4−3.5−3−2.5−2−1.5 lµ,ν (s,x)log10 P(lµ,ν (s,x) ) FIG. 7: A comparison of inter-tributary length distributio ns for the Scheidegger model. The example here is for order µ= 6 absorbing streams and order ν= 3 side streams. Note that no rescaling of the distributions has been performed. T he three length variables here correspond to x=b, x=i and x=e, i.e.,l(s,b) µ,ν(circles) l(s,i) µ,ν(squares), and ls,e µ,ν(triangles). These are the beginning, internal and end distances between enter - ing side branches, defined fully in the text. No quantitative difference between these three lengths is observed. which has the inversion ˜pµ= 1−e−1/(Rl(s))µ−1ξl(s). (21) Forµsufficiently large such that ˜ pµ≪1, we have the simplification ˜pµ≃1/(Rl(s))µ−1ξl(s). (22) We see that the probabilities satisfy the Horton-like scal- ing law ˜pµ/˜pµ−1= 1/Rl(s). (23) Thus, we begin to see the element of randomness in our expanded description of network architecture. The ter- mination of a stream segment by meeting a larger branch is effectively a spatially random process. VII. GENERALIZED DRAINAGE DENSITY Having observed the similarity of the distributions of Tµ,νandl(s) µ, we proceed to examine the exact nature of the relationship beteween the two. To do so, we introduce three new measures of stream length. These are l(s,b) µ,ν,(a) 0 20 40 60 80−5−4−3−2−1 lµ,ν (s,i)log10P(lµ,ν (s,i) ) 3678910.1〈 lµ, ν (s, i) 〉 FIG. 8: An examination of the asymptotic behavior of dis- tributions of internal inter-tributary lengths. The data h ere is for the Scheidegger model for the case of fixed side stream order ν= 2. The plot in (a) shows distributions for absorb- ing stream order µ= 3 (circles), µ= 4 (squares), µ= 6 (triangles), and µ= 8 (diamonds). As µincreases, the distri- butions, which are all individually exponential, tend towa rds a fixed exponential distribution. Since lower order stream s eg- ments have typically smaller lengths, they statistically b lock larger values of l(s,i) µ,ν, reducing the extent of the distribution tails for low µ. This is further evidenced in (b) which pro- vides a plot of /angbracketleftl(s,i) µ,ν/angbracketright, the mean inter-tributary stream length, as a function of µwithν= 2. These mean values approach /angbracketleftl(s,i) µ,ν=2/angbracketright= 1/ρ2≃10.1 where ρ2is the density of second-order side streams. the distance from the beginning of an order µabsorbing stream to the first order νside stream; l(s,i) µ,ν, the distance between any two adjacent internal order νside streams along an order µabsorbing stream; and ls,e µ,ν, the distance from the last order νside stream to the end of an order µabsorbing stream. By analysis of these inter-tributary lengths, we will be able to discern the distribution of side stream location along absorbing streams. This leads directly to a more general picture of drainage density which we fully expand upon in the following section. Figure 7 compares normalized distributions of l(s,b) µ,ν, l(s,i) µ,νandls,e µ,νfor the Scheidegger model. The data is for the distance between order ν= 3 side streams entering order µ= 6 absorbing streams. Once again, the distribu- tions are well approximated by exponential distributions. Moreover, they are indistinguishable. This indicates, at least for the Scheidegger model, that drainage density is9 independent of relative position of tributaries along an absorbing stream. We now consider the effect on the distribution of inter- nal inter-tributary distances l(s,i) µ,νfollowing from varia- tions in µ, the order of the absorbing stream. Figure 8(a) provides a comparison of l(s,i) µ,νdistributions for ν= 2 andµ= 3 through µ= 8. As µincreases, the distri- butions tend towards a limiting function. With increas- ingµwe are, on average, sampling absorbing streams of greater length and the full range of l(s,i) µ,νbecomes accord- ingly more accessible. This approach to a fixed distri- bution is reflected in the means of the distributions in Figure 8(a). Shown in Figure 8(b), the means ∝an}bracketle{tl(s,i) µ,ν∝an}bracketri}htfor ν= 2 approach a value of around 10 .1. The correspond- ing density of second-order streams for the Scheidegger model is thus ρ2= 1/∝an}bracketle{tl(s,i) µ,ν=2∝an}bracketri}ht ≃0.01. Higher drainage densities follow from equation (10). However, since devi- ations occur for small ν, there will also be an approach to uniform scaling to consider with drainage density. VIII. JOINT VARIATION OF TOKUNAGA RATIOS AND STREAM SEGMENT LENGTH We have so far observed that the individual distribu- tions of the l(s) µandTµ,νare exponential and that they are related via the side-stream density ρnu. However, this is not an exact relationship. For example, given a collection of stream segments with a fixed length l(s) µwe expect to find fluctuations in the corresponding Tokuna- ga ratios Tµ,ν. To investigate this further we now consider the joint variation of Tµ,νwithl(s) µfrom a number of perspectives. After discussing the full joint probability distribution P(Tµ,ν, l(s) µ) we then focus on the quotient v=Tµ,ν/l(s) µ and its reciprocal w=l(s) µ/Tµ,ν. The latter two quanti- ties are measures of drainage density and inter-tributary length for an individual absorbing stream. A. The joint probability distribution We build the joint distribution of P(Tµ,ν, l(s) µ) from our conception that stream segments are randomly dis- tributed throughout a basin. In equation (18), we have the probability of a stream segment terminating after l(s) µ steps. We need to incorporate into this form the prob- ability that the stream segment also has Tµ,νorder ν side streams. Since we assume placement of these side streams to be random, we modify equation (18) to find P(l(s) µ, Tµ,ν) = ˜pµ/parenleftbiggl(s) µ−1 Tµ,ν/parenrightbigg pTµ,νν(1−pν−˜pµ)l(s) µ−Tµ,ν−1, (24) where/parenleftbign k/parenrightbig =n!/k!(n−k)! is the binomial coefficient and pνis the probability of absorbing an order νside stream.The extra pνappears in the last factor (1 −pν−˜pµ) because this term is the probability that at a particular site the stream segment neither terminates nor absorbs an order νside stream. Also, it is simple to verify that the sum over l(s) µandTµ,νof the probability in equation (19) returns unity. While equation (19) does precisely describe the joint distribution P(l(s) µ, Tµ,ν), it is somewhat cumbersome to work with. We therefore find an analogous form defined for continuous rather than discrete variables. We simplify our notation by writing p=pν,q= (1−pν−˜pµ) and ˜p= ˜pµ. We also replace ( l(s) µ, Tµ,ν) by ( x, y) where now x, y∈R. Note that 0 ≤y≤x−1 since the number of side streams cannot be greater than the number of sites within a stream segment. Equation (19) becomes P(x, y) =N˜pΓ(x) Γ(y+ 1)Γ( x−y)(p)y(q)x−y−1,(25) where we have used Γ( z+ 1) = z! to generalize the binomial coefficient. We have included the normaliza- tionNto account for the fact that we have moved to continuous variables and the resulting probability may not be cleanly normalized. Also we must allow that N=N(p,˜p) and we will be able to identify this form more fully later on. Using Stirling’s approximation [29], that Γ( z+ 1)∼√ 2πzz+1/2e−z, we then have P(x, y) =N˜ppyqx−y−11√ 2π(x−1)x−3/2 yy+1/2(x−y−1)x−y−1/2 =N˜p√ 2πqpyqx−y(x−1)−1/2/parenleftbiggy x−1/parenrightbigg−y−1/2/parenleftbigg 1−y x−1/parenrightbigg− ≃N′x−1/2[F(y/x)]x where we have absorbed Nand all terms involving only pand ˜pinto the prefactor N′=N′(p,˜p) =N˜p/(√ 2πq). We have also assumed xis large such that x−1≃xand 1≫1/x≃0. The function F(v) =F(v;p, q) identified above has the form F(v) =/parenleftbigg1−v q/parenrightbigg−(1−v)/parenleftbiggv p/parenrightbigg−v . (27) where 0 < v < 1 (here and later, the variable vwill refer toy/x). Note that for fixed x, the conditional probability P(y|x) is proportional to [ F(y/x)]x. Figure 9(a) shows [F(v)]xfor a range of powers x. The basic function has a single peak situated near v=p. For increasing xwhich corresponds to increasing l(s) µ, the peak becomes sharp- er approaching (when normalized) a delta function, i.e., limx→∞[F(v)]x=δ(v−p). Figure 9(b) provides a comparison between data for the Scheidegger model and the analytic form of P(l(s) µ, Tµ,ν). For this example, µ= 6 and ν= 2 which corresponds to p≃0.10,q≃0.90 and ˜ p≃0.001 (using the results10 (a) (b) 00.20.40.60.8100.20.40.60.81 v = Tµ,ν / lµ (s)[F(v)]lµ (s) 0.05 0.1 0.15−1.5−1−0.500.511.5 v = Tµ,ν / lµ (s)P(v | lµ (s)) FIG. 9: Form of the joint distribution of Tokunaga ratios and stream segment lengths. The distribution is given in equa- tion (26) and is built around the function F(v=Tµ,ν/l(s) µ) given in equation (27). Shown in (a) is [ F(v)]l(s) µforl(s) µ= 1, 10, 100 and 1000. Increasing l(s) µcorresponds to the focusing of the shape. In (b), the distribution P(Tµ,ν|l(s) µ≃340) is compared between theory (smooth curve) and data from the Scheidegger model (circles). The Scheidegger model data is compiled for a range of values of l(s) µrescaled as per equa- tion (28). of the previous section). The smooth curve shown is the conditional probability P(y|X) for the example val- ue of X=l(s) µ≃340 following from equation (26). From simulations, we obtain a discretized approximation toP(l(s) µ, Tµ,ν). For each fixed x=l(s)in the range 165/lessorsimilarl(s) µ/lessorsimilar345, we rescale the data using the following derived from equation (26), P(X, y) =N′X−1/2/parenleftBig N′−1x1/2P(x, y)/parenrightBigX/x .(28) All rescaled data is then combined, binned and plotted as circles in Figure 9(b), showing excellent agreement with the theoretical curve. B. Distributions of side branches per unit stream length Having obtained the general form of P(l(s) µ, Tµ,ν), we now delve further into its properties by investigating thedistributions of the ratio v=Tµ,ν/l(s) µand its reciprocal w. The quantity Tµ,ν/l(s) µis the number of side streams per length of a given absorbing stream and when aver- aged over an ensemble of absorbing streams gives /angbracketleftBig Tµ,ν/l(s) µ/angbracketrightBig =ρν. (29) Accordingly, the reciprocal l(s) µ/Tµ,νis the average sepa- ration of side streams of order ν. First, we derive P(Tµ,ν/l(s)) from P(l(s) µ, Tµ,ν). We then consider some intuitive rescalings which will allow us to deduce the form of the normalization N(p, q). We rewrite equation (26) as P(x, y) =N′x−1/2exp{−xln[−F(y/x)]}.(30) We transform ( x, y) to the modified polar coordinate sys- tem described by ( u, v) with the relations u2=x2+y2and v=y/x. (31) The inverse relations are x=u/(1+v2) and y=uv/(1+ v2) and we also have d xdy=xdudv. Equation (32) leads to P(u, v) =N′/parenleftbiggu 1 +v2/parenrightbigg1/2 exp/braceleftbigg −u 1 +v2ln [−F(v)]/bracerightbigg . (32) To find P(v) we integrate out over the radial dimension u: P(v) =/integraldisplay∞ u=0duP(u, v) =N′/integraldisplay∞ u=0du/parenleftbiggu 1 +v2/parenrightbigg1/2 exp/braceleftbigg −u 1 +v2ln [−F(v)]/bracerightbigg =N′(1 +v2)(ln[−F(v)])−3/2/integraldisplay∞ z=0dzz1/2e−z =N′′1 +v2 (ln[−F(v)])3/2. (33) Here, N′′=N′Γ(3/2) =N′√π/2 and we have used the substitution z=u/(1 +v2)ln[−F(v)]. The distribution for w=l(s) µ/Tµ,ν= 1/vfollows sim- ply from equation (33) and we find P(w) =N′′ 1 +w2 w4(ln[−F(1/w)])3/2. (34) Figures 10(a) and 10(b) compare the predicted forms of P(v) andP(w) with data from the Scheidegger model. In both cases, the data is for order ν= 2 side streams being absorbed by streams of order µ= 6. Note that both dis- tributions show an initially exponential-like decay away from a central peak. Moreover, the agreement is excel- lent, offering further support to the notion that the spa- tial distribution of stream segments is random.11 (a) (b) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3−1.5−1−0.500.511.5 Tµ,ν / lµ (s) log10P(Tµ,ν / lµ (s) ) 01020304050−4−3.5−3−2.5−2−1.5−1−0.5 lµ (s) / Tµ,νlog10P(lµ (s) / Tµ,ν ) FIG. 10: Comparison of theory with measurements of aver- age inter-tributary distances for the Scheidegger model. T he data in both (a) and (b) is for the case of order ν= 2 side streams and order µ= 6 absorbing streams. In (a), the distri- bution of v=Tµ,ν/l(s) µobtained from the Scheidegger model (circles) is compared with the smooth curved predicted in equation (33). The same comparison is made for the recipro- cal variable w=l(s) µ/Tµ,ν, the predicted curve being given in equation (34). Finally, we quantify how changes in the orders µandν affect the width of the distributions by considering some natural rescalings. Figure 11(a) shows binned, normal- ized distributions of Tµ,ν/l(s) µfor the Scheidegger model. Here, the side stream order is ν= 2 and the absorbing stream orders range over µ= 5 to µ= 8. All distribu- tions are centered around ρ2≃0.10. Because the average length of l(s) µincreases by a factor Rl(s)withµ, the typical number of side streams increases by the same factor. Since we can decompose l(s) µas l(s) µ=l(s,b) µ,ν+l(s,i) µ,ν+. . .+l(s,i) µ,ν+ls,e µ,ν, (35) where there are Tµ,ν−1 instances of l(s,i) µ,ν,l(s) µbecomes better and better approximated by ( Tµ,ν+ 1)∝an}bracketle{tl(s,i) µ,ν∝an}bracketri}ht. Hence, the distribution of Tµ,ν/l(s) µpeaks up around ρ2asµincreases, the typical width reducing by a factor of 1//radicalbig Rl(s)for every step in µ. Using this observation, Figure 11(b) shows a rescaling of the same distributions shown in Figure 11(a). The form of this rescaling is P(Tµ,ν/l(s) ν) = (Rl(s))µ/2G1/parenleftBig [Tµ,ν/l(s) ν−ρ2](Rl(s))µ/2/parenrightBig (36)(a) 0.05 0.075 0.10.125 0.150.511.52 Tµ,ν / lµ (s)log10 P(Tµ,ν / lµ (s) ) −2−2−1.5−1−0.50log10(Rl (s) )−µ/2 P(Tµ,ν / lµ s ) FIG. 11: Distributions of the quantity Tµ,ν/l(s) µfor the Schei- degger model with µ, the order of the absorbing stream, vary- ing and the side stream order fixed at ν= 2. Given in (a) are unrescaled distributions for µ= 5 (circles), µ= 6 (squares), µ= 7 (triangles), and µ= 8 (diamonds). Note that as the order of the absorbing stream increases so does its typical length. This leads to better averaging and the standard devi - ation of the distribution decays as R−ω/2 l. The distributions are all centered near the typical density of order ν= 2 side streams, ρ2≃0.10. The rescaled versions of these distribu- tions are given in (b) with the details as per equation (36). where the function is similar to the form of P(v) given in equation (33). The mean drainage density of ρ2has been subtracted to center the distribution. We are able to generalize this scaling form of the distri- bution further by taking into account side stream order. Figures 12(a) and 12(b) respectively show the unrescaled and rescaled distributions of Tµ,ν/l(s) µwithνallowed to vary. This particular example taken from the Scheideg- ger model is for µ= 6 and the range ν= 1 to ν= 5. Since νis now changing, the centers are situated at the separate values of the ρν. Also, the typical number of side streams changes with order νso the widths of the distri- butions dilate as for the varying µcase by a factor/radicalbig Rl(s). Notice that the rescaling works well for ν= 2, . . . ,5 but notν= 1. As we have noted, deviations from scaling from small orders are to be expected. In this case, we are led to write down P(Tµ,ν/l(s) ν)(Rl(s))−ν/2G2/parenleftBig [Tµ,ν/l(s) ν−ρν](Rl(s))−ν/2/parenrightBig (37) where, again, G2(z) is similar in form to P(v).12 (a) (b) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15−0.500.511.52 Tµ,ν / lµ (s)log10P(Tµ,ν / lµ (s) ) −0.2−0.1 00.10.2−1.5−1−0.500.51 [Tµ,ν / lµ (s) − ρν] (Rl (s) )µ/2−ν/2log10(Rl (s) )−µ/2+ν/2 P(Tµ,ν / lµ (s) ) FIG. 12: Distributions of number of side streams per unit length for the Scheidegger model with ν, the order of side streams, varying. For both (a) and (b), the absorbing stream order is µ= 6. Shown in (a) are the unrescaled distribu- tions for ν= 2 (circles), ν= 3 (squares), and ν= 4 (tri- angles). Note that as νincreases, the mean number of side streams decreases as do the fluctuations. The distributions in (a) together with the distribution for ν= 5 (diamonds) are shown rescaled in (b) as per equation (38). We find the same rescalings apply for the Mississip- pi data. For example, Figure 13(a) shows unrescaled distributions of Tµ,ν/l(s) νfor varying ν. Figure 13(b) then shows reasonable agreement with the form of equa- tion (37). In this case, the Scheidegger model clearly affords valuable guidance in our investigations of real river networks. The ratio Rl(s)= 2.40 was calculated from an analysis of l(s) ωandlω. The density ρ2≃0.0004 was estimated directly from the distributions of Tµ,ν/l(s) ν and means that approximately four second-order streams appear every ten kilometers. Combining equations (38) and (38), we obtain the com- plete scaling form P(Tµ,ν/l(s) ν) = (Rl(s))(µ−ν−1)/2G/parenleftBig [Tµ,ν/l(s) ν−ρν](Rl(s))(µ−ν−1)/2/parenrightBig . (38) As per G1andG2, the function Gis similar in form to P(v). The above scaling form makes intuitive sense but is not obviously obtained from an inspection of (33). We therefore examine P(v) by determining the position and magnitude of its maximum. Rather than solve P′(v) = 0 directly, we find an approximate solution by considering(a) 00.15 0.3 0.45 0.600.511.5 Tµ,ν / lµ (s)log10P(Tµ,ν / lµ (s) ) −0.5−0.8−0.400.40.8log10(Rl (s))−ν P(Tµ,ν / lµ (s) ) FIG. 13: Tokunaga statistics for the Mississippi river basi n. The distributions are as per Figure 12(a), distributions of number of side streams per unit length with ν, the order of side streams, varying. The absorbing stream order is µ= 7 and the the individual distributions correspond to ν= 2 (circles), ν= 3 (squares) and ν= 4 (triangles). All lengths are measured in meters. Rescalings of the distributions sho wn in (a) along with that for ν= 5 (diamonds) are found in (b). Reasonable agreement with equation (38) is observed. the argument of the denominator, −lnF(v), with F(v) given in equation (27). Since the numerator of P(v) is 1 +v2and the maximum occurs for small vthis is a justifiable step. Setting d F/dv= 0, we thus have −ln1−v q+ lnvp= 0, (39) which gives vm=p/(q+p) =p/(1−˜p). Note that for ˜p≪1, we have vm≃p. Substituting v=vm=p/(1−˜pinto equation (33), we find P(vm)≃N′′˜p−3/2=N˜p−1/22−3/2(40) presuming p2≪1 and q≃1. Returning to the scaling form of equation (38), we see that the ˜ p−1/2factor in equation (40) accounts for the factors of ( Rl(s))µ/2since ˜p= ˜pµscales from level to level by the ratio Rl(s). We therefore find the other factor ( Rl(s))ν/2of equation (38) gives N=cp1/2where cis a constant. Since p=pν, it is the only factor that can provide this variation. We thus have found the variation with stream order of the normalization Nand have fully characterized, P(x, y), the continuum approximation of P(l(s) µ, Tµ,ν).13 IX. CONCLUDING REMARKS We have extensively investigated river network archi- tecture as viewed in planform. We identify the self- similarity of a form of drainage density as the essence of the average connectivity and structure of networks. From previous work in [4], we then understand this to be a base from which all river network scaling laws may obtained. We have extended the description of tributary struc- ture provided by Tokunaga’s law to find that side stream numbers are distributed exponentially. This in turn is seen to follow from the fact that the length of stream segments are themselves exponentially distributed. We interpret this to be consequence of randomness in the spatial distribution of stream segments. Furthermore, the presence of exponential distributions indicate fluc- tuations in variables are significant being on the order of mean values. For the example of stream segment lengths, we thus identify ξl(s), a single parameter need- ed to describe all moments. This is simply related to ξt, which describes the distributions of Tokunaga ratios. The exponential distribution becomes the null hypothe- sis for the distributions of these variables to be used in the examination of real river networks. We are able to discern the finer details of the connec- tion between stream segment length and tributary num- bers. Analysis of the placement of side streams along a stream segment again reveals exponential distributions. We are then able to postulate a joint probability dis- tribution for stream segment lengths and the Tokunaga ratios. The functional form obtained agrees well with both model and real network data. By further consider- ing distributions of the number of side streams per unit length of individual stream segments, we are able to cap- ture how variations in the separation of side streams areaveraged out along higher-order absorbing streams. By expanding our knowledge of the underlying dis- tributions through empiricism, modeling and theory, we obtain a more detailed picture of network structure with which to compare real and theoretical networks. We have also further shown that the simple random network mod- el of Scheidegger has an impressive ability to produce statistics whose form may then be observed in nature. Indeed, the only distinction between the two is the exact value of the scaling exponents and ratios involved since all distributions match up in functional form. We end with a brief comment on the work of Cui et al.[13] who have recently also proposed a stochastic gen- eralization of Tokunaga’s law. They postulate that the underlying distribution for the Tµ,νis a negative binomial distribution. One parameter additional to T1andRT,α, was introduced to reflect “regional variability,” i.e., sta - tistical fluctuations in network structure. This is in the same spirit as our identification of a single parameter ξt. However, our work disagrees on the nature of the under- lying distribution of Tµ,ν. We have consistently observed exponential distributions for Tµ,νin both model and real networks. In closing, by finding randomness in the spatial distri- bution of stream segments, we have arrived at the most basic description of river network architecture. Under- standing the origin of the exact values of quantities such as drainage density remains an open problem. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank J.S. Weitz for useful discussions. This work was supported in part by NSF grant EAR-9706220 and the Department of Energy grant DE FG02-99ER 15004. [1] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Geometry of River Net- works I: Scaling, Fluctuations, and Deviations (2000), submitted to PRE. [2] A. Maritan, A. Rinaldo, R. Rigon, A. Giacometti, and I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, Phys. Rev. E 53(2), 1510 (1996). [3] I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe and A. Rinaldo, Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Great Britain, 1997). [4] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Phys. Rev. E 59(5), 4865 (1999), cond-mat/9808244. [5] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Annu. Rev. Earth Plan- et. Sci. 28, 571 (2000). [6] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Geometry of River Net- works II: Distributions of Component Size and Number (2000), submitted to PRE. [7] E. Tokunaga, Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido Univ. 15, 1 (1966). [8] E. Tokunaga, Geogr. Rep., Tokyo Metrop. Univ. 13, 1 (1978). [9] E. Tokunaga, Trans. Jpn. Geomorphol. Union 5(2), 71(1984). [10] A. E. Scheidegger, Bull. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. 12(1), 15 (1967). [11] R. E. Horton, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am 56(3), 275 (1945). [12] A. N. Strahler, EOS Trans. AGU 38(6), 913 (1957). [13] G. Cui, B. Williams, and G. Kuczera, Water Resour. Res. 35(10), 3139 (1999). [14] D. L. Turcotte, J. D. Pelletier, and W. I. Newman, J. Theor. Biol. 193, 577 (1998). [15] S. D. Peckham, Water Resour. Res. 31(4), 1023 (1995). [16] S. A. Schumm, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am 67, 597 (1956). [17] J. S. Huxley and G. Teissier, Nature 137, 780 (1936). [18] J. T. Hack, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 294-B , 45 (1957). [19] F. Colaiori, A. Flammini, A. Maritan, and J. R. Banavar, Phys. Rev. E 55(2), 1298 (1997). [20] D. G. Tarboton, R. L. Bras, and I. Rodr´ ıguez-Iturbe, Water Resour. Res. 26(9), 2243 (1990). [21] S. S. Manna, D. Dhar, and S. N. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. A46, 4471 (1992). [22] S. S. Manna and B. Subramanian, Phys. Rev. Lett.14 76(18), 3460 (1996). [23] W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , vol. I (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968), third ed. [24] H. Takayasu, I. Nishikawa, and H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. A 37(8), 3110 (1988). [25] M. Takayasu and H. Takayasu, Phys. Rev. A 39(8), 4345 (1989). [26] H. Takayasu, M. Takayasu, A. Provata, and G. Huber, J. Stat. Phys. 65(3/4), 725 (1991). [27] G. Huber, Physica A 170, 463 (1991).[28] D. Dhar, Physica A 263, 4 (1999). [29] C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced mathemat- ical methods for scientists and engineers , International series in pure and applied mathematics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978). [30] The network for the Mississippi was extracted from a topographic dataset constructed from three arc second USGS Digital Elevation Maps, decimated by averaging to approximately 1000 meter horizontal resolution ( www. usgs.gov ). At this grid scale, the Mississippi was found to be an order Ω = 11 basin.

arXiv:physics/0005050v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 19 May 2000Nonlinear relaxation field in charged systems under high ele ctric fields K. Morawetz LPC-ISMRA, Bld Marechal Juin, 14050 Caen and GANIL, Bld Becq uerel, 14076 Caen Cedex 5, France The influence of an external electric field on the current in ch arged systems is investi- gated. The results from the classical hierarchy of density m atrices are compared with the results from the quantum kinetic theory. The kinetic theory yields a systematic treatment of the nonlinear current beyond linear response. To this end the dynamically screened and field-dependent Lenard-Balescu equation is integrated analytically and the nonlinear relaxation field is calculated. The classical linear respon se result known as Debye - On- sager relaxation effect is only obtained if asymmetric scree ning is assumed. Considering the kinetic equation of one specie the other species have to b e screened dynamically while the screening with the same specie itself has to be performed statically. Different other approximations are discussed and compared. I. INTRODUCTION High field transport has become a topic of cur- rent interest in various fields of physics. In semi- conductors the nonlinear transport effects are ac- cessible due to femto - second laser pulses and shrink devices [1]. In plasma physics these field effects can be studied within such short pulse pe- riods [2]. One observable of interest is the cur- rent or the electrical conductivity which gives ac- cess to properties of dense nonideal plasmas [3]. In high energy physics the transport in strong electric fields is of interest due to pair creation [4]. In order to describe these field effects one can start conve- niently from kinetic theory. Within this approach the crucial question is to derive appropriate kinetic equations which include field effects beyond linear response. At low strength of the external electric field one expects the linear response regime to be valid. Then the contribution of field effects to the con- ductivity can be condensed into the Debye- On- sager relaxation effect [5–11] which was first de- rived within the theory of electrolytes [12–16]. De- bye has given a limiting law of electrical conduc- tivity [12] which stated that the external electric fieldEon a single charge Z= 1 is diminished in an electrolyte solution by the amount δE=E(1−κe2 6T) (1) where eis the elementary charge, Ethe electric field strength, Tis the temperature of the plasma andκis the inverse screening radius of the screen- ing cloud. This law is interpreted as a deceleration force which is caused by the deformed screening cloud surrounding the charge. Later it has beenshown by Onsager [13] that this result has to be corrected to δE=E(1−κe2 3(2 +√ 2)T) (2) if the dynamics of ions ( Z= 1) is considered. While the linear response theory seems to repro- duce this Onsager result [8,9,11], the kinetic theory seems to support more the Debye result [10,17,11]. The correct treatment is a matter of ongoing de- bate. In this paper we will give the result beyond linear response for the statically and dynamically screened approximation. Here different approxi- mations of kinetic theory will be discussed and the one which leads to the closest form to the hydro- dynamical approximation (Onsager result) is pre- sented. The kinetic approach describes the time evolu- tion of the one particle distribution function within an external field Eas ∂ ∂tf−eZE∂ ∂kf=I[f,E] (3) where the field dependent collision integral I[f,E] has to be provided by different approximations. In- tegrating this kinetic equation over the momentum kone obtains the balance of the current. For sim- plicity we assume that the distribution function can be parameterized by a displaced local equilib- rium one with a field and time dependent momen- tumf(k, t) =f0(k−p(E, t)) which is related to the current Jas J(E) =nZep(E) m(4) if the charge is Ze, the density nand the mass m. The balance equation for the field and time 1dependent local momentum p(E, t) follows from (3) as ∂ ∂tp−eZ(1 +δE(E) E)E=R(E)eZnJ (5) where the relaxation field δE(E) as well as the free conductivity R(E) follows from the field dependent collision integral. The total conductivity E=σJ is then given by σ(E) =R(E) 1 +δE(E) E. (6) The free conductivity Ris the subject of intense investigations in the literature [3]. It is known that the Coulomb divergence for small wave vectors is omitted if screening is included and the divergence at large wave vectors is omitted by the De Broglie wavelength i.e. by the quantum effects. We will not consider the discussion of the free conductivity Rhere but concentrate on the relaxation field δE. The free conductivity can be obtained by the same considerations as will be outlined here. We want to point out that the relaxation field will turn out to be free of long wave divergences in the classical limit in contrast to the free conductivity R. First we recall the hydrodynamical approach starting from the classical Bogoliubov-Born- Green-Kirkwood-Yvon (BBGKY) hierarchy which results into an analytical formula for the classi- cal relaxation effect already reported [18]. This result is then compared with the quantum ki- netic approach. We give a short rederivation of the field dependent kinetic equations in dynami- cal screened approximation from the Green’s func- tion technique in Sec. III. Two approximations, the static screening as well as dynamical screening are presented. In the fourth section we will de- rive the field dependent current analytically. We present both the statically as well as dynamically screened treatment as analytical results. The clas- sical expressions for the statically screened result [17] is compared with the classical result from hy- drodynamical approximation. The dynamical re- sult is then derived analytically too and it will be shown that only for asymmetric screening the hy- drodynamical result can be approached. In Sec. V we shortly discuss the physical limitation of field strengths for the local equilibrium assumption and the gradient approximation. Sec. VI summarizes and the appendix gives the calculation of some in- volved integrals appearing during the integration of the Lenard-Balescu equation.II. APPROACH BY CLASSICAL BBGKY-HIERARCHY The starting point for the classical considera- tions is the BBGKY hierarchy [19,20] which reads for the one - particle distribution function Fa ∂Fa ∂t+v∂Fa ∂r+ea ma¯E∂Fa ∂v−SaFa =/summationdisplay bnbeaeb ma∂ ∂v/integraldisplay dr′dv′Fab(r,r′,v,v′)∂ ∂r1 |r−r′| (7) and the two - particle distribution function Fab ∂Fab ∂t+v∂Fab ∂r+v′∂Fab ∂r′+ea ma¯E∂Fab ∂v +eb mb¯E∂Fab ∂v′−SaFab−SbFab =eaeb∂ ∂r1 |r−r′|/parenleftbigg1 ma∂Fab ∂v−1 mb∂Fab ∂v′/parenrightbigg +/summationdisplay cncec/integraldisplay dr′′dv′′/parenleftbiggea ma∂ ∂r1 |r−r′′|·∂Fabc ∂v +eb mb∂ ∂r′1 |r′−r′′|·∂Fabc ∂v′/parenrightbigg (8) with the external field E.Sadescribes a collision integral with some background which we will spec- ify later. This hierarchy is truncated approximat- ing that [20] Fab=FaFb+gab Fabc=FaFbFc+Fagbc+Fbgac+Fcgab (9) where gab(ra,rb,va,vb) is the two-particle corre- lation function. Within the local equilibrium approximation we suppose a stationary (for example a local Maxwellian) distribution for the velocities in the one and two-particle distribution functions fa(r,v, t) =na(r, t)/parenleftigma 2πT/parenrightig3/2 exp/bracketleftbigg −ma(v−ua)2 2T/bracketrightbigg gab(r,r′,v,v′, t) =Fab−FaFb =hab(r,r′, t)/parenleftigmamb 4π2T2/parenrightig3/2 exp/bracketleftbigg −ma(v−wab)2 2T−mb(v′−wba)2 2T/bracketrightbigg . (10) Here we have introduced the local one-particle den- sity and the local average velocity na(r, t) =/integraldisplay dvFa(r,v, t) ua=1 na/integraldisplay dvvFa(r,v, t) (11) 2as well as the pair correlation function and average pair velocity hab(r,r′, t) =/integraldisplay dvdv′gab(r,r′,v,v′, t), wab(r,r′, t) =1 hab/integraldisplay dvdv′vgab(r,r′,v,v′, t). (12) Further on, we suppose that the particles interact with some background (e.g. neutrals or electrolyte solvent) by the collision integrals Sawith the fol- lowing properties /integraldisplay dvSafa= 0 /integraldisplay dvvSafa=1 bamaρaua, /integraldisplay dvvSagab(r,r′,v,v′, t) =1 bamahabwab(13) where bais the mobility of particle of type a. This friction with a background serves here to couple the two - particle equations and will be considered infinitesimal small in the end. However, as we will demonstrate this yields to a symmetry breaking in the system which leads basically to different results than neglecting this friction. Fourier transform of the resulting two equations (9) into momentum space and assuming a homo- geneous density n(r) =nwe arrive at the coupled equation system −ea T¯E.(va−ua)fa=ua bama+/summationdisplay b4π nbeaeb T ×/integraldisplaydk (2π)3ik.(va−wab) k2fa(va−wab+ua)hab(k) (14) and ik.(va−vb)gab−(ea(va−wab)+eb(vb−wba))¯E Tgab =−ieaeb4π k2k.(va−ua−vb+ub)fafb −i/integraldisplayd¯k (2π)34πeaeb Tk2¯k.(va−wab−vb+wba)gab(k−¯k) −/summationdisplay cnc/integraldisplay dvc4πiec Tk2[eak.(va−ua)fagcb(k) −ebk.(vb−ub)fbgac(k)] +Sagab+Sbgab (15) with ¯E=E−/summationdisplay bnbeb/integraldisplay drbdvb∂ ∂rb1 |ra−rb|Fb.(16)By multiplying the above equation system by 1,va,vband integrating over the velocities we ob- tain the Onsager equation [13] ba/bracketleftig Thab(k)(1 + iea ea) +eaΦb(−k)/bracketrightig =−bb/bracketleftig Thab(k)(1−ieb ea) +ebΦa(k)/bracketrightig (17) with k2Φa(k) = 4πea+/summationdisplay cncechac(k) k2Φa(−k) = 4πea+/summationdisplay cncechca(k) (18) for the two -particle correlation function hab. Here we use a=ek.¯E k2T. (19) Let us already remark here that the friction with a background described by the mobilities bcouple the two sides of the equation (17). If we had not considered this friction, Si= 0, we would have obtained that the left and the right hand side of (17) vanish separately. This will lead essentially to a different result even for infinite small friction. There is no continuous transition between these two extreme cases pointing to a symmetry breaking in the two treatments. Let us first discuss the case with background friction. A. With background friction The system (17) for electrons, ee=e, and ions, ei=−Ze, with charge Zreads expanded Thee=−eΦe(−k) + Φ e(k) 2 Thei=−eΦi(−k)−Zbi beΦe(k) 1 +bi be+ia(1 +bi beZ) Thie=−eΦi(k)−Zbi beΦe(−k) 1 +bi be−ia(1 +bi beZ) Thii=ZeΦi(−k) + Φ i(k) 2. (20) This we can solve together with (18). First we calculate the effective field strength at the position of the electron in linear response δE EE=−iE E1 (2π)2∞/integraldisplay 0k3dk1/integraldisplay −1d(cosθ)cosθΦe(k) =Eκe2 3TZq√q+ 1(21) 3withκ2=κ2 e(1 +Z) =4π(e2ne+Z2e2ni) Tand q=be+Zbi (1 +Z)(be+bi). (22) For single charged ions Z= 1 the influence of the mobilities drop out and we recover the Onsager result (2). Since this result is independent of the mobilities one could conclude that this is a universal limiting law. However we will express two doubts here. As one sees for charges Z >1 the Onsager result is approached only in the limit where the ion mobil- ities are much smaller than the electron mobilities bi/be→0. This means of course that the electrons have different friction with a thought background than the ions. In other words there is an explicit symmetry breaking mechanism included by assum- ing such collision integrals with the background. Therefore we will obtain another solution if we con- sider no friction. The second remark concerns the limit of one- component system which one can obtain by setting Z=−1. The Onsager result or hydrodynamical result with friction (21) leads to twice the Debye result (1) in this case but with opposite sign. Op- positely we will see in the following that the per- fectly symmetric treatment of the species without friction with a background will lead to a vanishing one component limit as it should. This again un- derlies the symmetry breaking if one assumes an infinitesimal small friction with a background. For completeness, we want to recall the expres- sion of the nonlinear Onsager result [18,17] which is obtained from the limit bi/be→0 of the system (20) Thee+eϕe(−k) +ϕe(k) 2= 0 hei(T+i ekE k2) +eϕi(−k) =o(bi be) = 0 −hie(T−i ekE k2)−eϕi(k) =o(bi be) = 0 Thii−Zeϕi(−k) + ˜ϕi(k) 2= 0. (23) One obtains [14,18] the result for Z= 1 δE=−e2κe 3(1 +√ 2)TEFH(eE Tκe) =−e2κe 6TE  2−√ 2 +o(E) 3κT 2eE+o(1/E)2(24) withFH(α) =3(1 +√ 2) α2/bracketleftbigg1 2/radicalbig α2+2−1+1 αarctan( α) −1 αarctan(α√ α2+ 2)/bracketrightbigg . (25) The numerical values of this result will be dis- cussed in chapter (IV C). B. Without background Now we reconsider the steps from (15) to (17) without friction with the background. We obtain that both sides of (17) vanish separately Thab(k)(1 + iea ea) +eaΦb(−k) = 0 Thab(k)(1−ieb ea) +ebΦa(k) = 0. (26) Both equations have identical solutions habwhich can be easily verified using the symmetry hab(k) = hba(−k). Together with (18) we can solve for Φ e and the relaxation field is obtained instead of (24) δE=−e2κe√ 1 +Z 6T(Z+ 1)EFN(eE Tκe) (27) which takes for Z= 1 δE E=−e2κe 6T/braceleftigg2 +o(E) 3κT eE+o(1/E)2(28) with FN(α) =3 (1 +Z)α2/bracketleftig/radicalbig 4 + (1 + Z)α2 +4√1 +Zαlog2√ 1 +Zα+/radicalbig 4 + (1 + Z)α2/bracketrightigg .(29) We see that the linear response result for Z= 1 is twice the Debye result (1). For equal charged system Z=−1 which would coincide with a one component plasma no relaxation effect appears as one would expect. In other words in a perfectly symmetric mathematical two - component plasma there is another relaxation effect than in a system which distinguishs the components by a different treatment of friction. The Onsager result (24) does not vanish for the limit of one-component plasma Z=−1. This is due to the different treatment of ions and electrons there which assumes explicitly a two component plasma. Therefore the limit Z= −1 does not work there. This result is quite astonishing. One would ex- pect that the limiting procedure which transforms the system (18) into (26) would also lead to a 4smooth transitions of the end results. However this is not the case. While the separate limit of be,i→ ∞ of (18) leads to (26) there is no possi- bility to transform the result (21) into the linear response result of (28). This underlines that due to even infinitesimal small friction assumed in obtain- ing (21) there occurs a symmetry breaking in the sense that the electrons and ions are not anymore symmetrically treated. This lesson we have to keep in mind when we now advance and investigate the systematic treatment by quantum kinetic theory. There we will find also complete different results when we use asymmetric screening compared to symmetric screening. Of course, we will not assume any phe- nomenological friction since the kinetic theory pro- vides for a systematic description of all occurring processes. Here we want only to point out that the above symmetry breaking is the main reason for the confusion in literature. Following the lin- ear response formalism an asymmetric treatment of two - particle correlation functions is used in that the electrons are statically screened [11]. This seemingly innocent usage leads there to an occa- sional agreement for Z= 1 with the Onsager result (2). Another advantage of the kinetic theory we want to point out here. The classical local equilibrium or hydrodynamical approximation does not lead to a mass dependence of the relaxation effect. This will be provided by the kinetic theory. III. QUANTUM KINETIC THEORY We will formulate the kinetic theory within gauge invariant functions not missing field effects. The most promising theoretical tool is the Green function technique [1,21–23]. The resulting equa- tions show some typical deviations from the ordi- nary Boltzmann equation: (i) A collision broad- ening which consists in a smearing out of the ele- mentary energy conservation of scattering. This is necessary to ensure global energy conservation [24]. (ii) The intra-collisional field effect, which gives ad- ditional retardation effects in the momentum of the distribution functions. This comes mainly from the gauge invariance. One of the most important question is the range of applicability of these kinetic equations. Up to which field strengths are such modifications impor- tant and appropriate described within one-particle equations? In [25] this question has been investi- gated for semiconductor transport. It was found that for high external fields the intra-collisional field effect becomes negligible. This range is givenby a characteristic time scale of field effects τ2 F= m¯h/(eE·q) which has to be compared with the inverse collision frequency. This criterion is a pure quantum one. It remains the question whether there are also criteria in the classical limit. For a plasma system we will discuss in the summary that there is indeed a critical value of the field strength which can be given by classical considerations. A. Definitions In order to describe correlations in highly nonequilibrium situations, we define various cor- relation functions by different products of creation and annihilation operators G>(1,2) =<Ψ(1)Ψ+(2)> G<(1,2) =<Ψ+(2)Ψ(1) > . (30) Here<>is the average value with the unknown statistical nonequilibrium operator ρand 1 denotes the cumulative variables ( r1, s1, t1...) of space, spin, time etc. The equation of motion for the correlation functions are given in the form of the Kadanoff-Baym equation [26,27,23] −i/parenleftbig G−1 0G<−G<G−1 0/parenrightbig =i/parenleftbig GRΣ<−Σ<GA/parenrightbig −i/parenleftbig ΣRG<−G<ΣA/parenrightbig (31) where the retarded and advanced functions are in- troduced as AR(1,2) =−iΘ(t1−t2)[A>±A<] and AA(1,2) =iΘ(t2−t1)[A>±A<]. Here operator no- tation is employed where products are understood as integrations over intermediate variables (time and space) and the upper/lower sign stands for Fermions/Bosons respectively. The Hartree- Fock drift term reads G−1 0(11′) =/parenleftbigg i¯h∂ ∂t1+¯h2 2m∇2 x1−ΣHF(11′)/parenrightbigg δ(1−1′) (32) with the Hartree Fock self energy ΣHF(1,1′) =/parenleftbigg ∓δ(r1−r′ 1)/integraldisplay dr2V(r1−r2)G<(r2t′ 1r2t1) +V(r1−r′ 1)G<(r1t1r′ 1t′ 1)/parenrightbig δ(t1−t′ 1) (33) where G(r2, t1,r2, t1) =n(r2, t1) is the density. B. Gauge invariance In order to get an unambiguous way of con- structing approximations we have to formulate our 5theory in gauge invariant way. This can be done following a procedure known from field theory [28]. This method has been applied to high field prob- lems in [29]. With the help of the Fourier transform of an arbitrary function G(x,X) over the relative coordinates x= (r2−r1, t2−t1) = (r, τ) with the center of mass coordinates X= ((r2+r1)/2,(t2+ t1)/2) = (R, t) one can introduce a gauge-invariant Fourier-transform of the difference coordinates x ¯G(k, X) =/integraldisplay dxG(xX) ×exp  i ¯h1 2/integraldisplay −1 2dλxµ[kµ+e cAµ(X+λx)]  .(34) For constant electric fields, which will be of interest in the following, one obtains a generalized Fourier- transform ¯G(k, X) =/integraldisplay dxei ¯h[xµkµ+erEt]G(x, X), where the χfunction was chosen in such a way that the scalar potential is zero Aµ= (0,−cEt). There- fore, we have the following rule in formulating the kinetic theory gauge-invariantly 1. Fourier transformation of the 4-dimensional difference-variable x to canonical momentum p. 2. Shifting the momentum to kinematic mo- mentum according to p=k−eEt. 3. The gauge invariant functions ¯Gare given by G(p, t) =G(k−eEt, t) =¯G(k, t) =¯G(p+eEt, t). (35) We shall make use of these rules in the following sections. In [30] this procedure has been general- ized for two - particle Greens functions and leads to the field - dependent Bethe - Salpeter - equation. C. Equation for Wigner distribution In the relative and center of mass coordinates the time diagonal part of (31) reads [31] ∂ ∂tf(p, t) = t−t0/integraldisplay 0dτ/bracketleftig/braceleftig G>(p, t−τ 2,−τ),Σ<(p, t−τ 2, τ)/bracerightig −/braceleftig G<(p, t−τ 2,−τ),Σ>(p, t−τ 2, τ)/bracerightig/bracketrightig (36)Here f(p, t) =G<(p,R, t, τ= 0) denotes the Wigner distribution function and we suppress the center of mass coordinates. {,}is the anti- commutator understood that the τvariable at the first place comes with a minus sign respec- tively. This equation is exact in time, but accord- ing to the assumed slowly varying space depen- dence we have used gradient expansion for space variables and dropped all R-dependence for sim- plicity. This criterion is discussed in the last sec- tion (96). With the help of the gauge invariant for- mulation of Green’s function (III B), we can write the kinetic equation (36) finally in the following gauge-invariant form ∂ ∂tf(k, t) +eE∇kf(k, t) =t−t0/integraldisplay 0dτ /bracketleftigg/braceleftbigg G>(k−eE 2τ, τ, t−τ 2),Σ<(k−eE 2τ,−τ, t−τ 2)/bracerightbigg + −/braceleftbigg G<(k−eE 2τ, τ, t−τ 2),Σ>(k−eE 2τ,−τ, t−τ 2)/bracerightbigg +/bracketrightigg . (37) This kinetic equation is exact in time convolutions. This is necessary because gradient expansions in time are connected with linearization in electric fields and consequently fail [32]. The gradient ap- proximation in space has been applied assuming slow varying processes in space. This corresponds to the limit of a weakly coupled plasma, which we employed already in Section II. Please remind that due to Coulomb gauge we do not have space inho- mogeneity by the electric field. D. Spectral function The spectral properties of the system are de- scribed by the Dyson equation for the retarded Green function. A free particle in a uniform elec- tric field, where the field is represented by a vector potential E(t) =−1 c. A(t) leads to the following equation /bracketleftbigg i¯h∂ ∂t−ǫ(p−e cA(t))/bracketrightbigg GR 0(p, tt′) =δ(t−t′). (38) This equation is easily integrated [33,34] GR 0(p, tt′) =−iΘ(t−t′)exp i ¯ht′/integraldisplay tdu ǫ(p−e cA(u)) . (39) 6For free particles and parabolic dispersions, the gauge invariant spectral function [33,34] follows A0(k, ω) = 2∞/integraldisplay 0dτcos/parenleftbigg ωτ−k2 2m¯hτ−e2E2 24m¯hτ3/parenrightbigg =2π ǫEAi/parenleftbiggk2/2m−¯hω ǫE/parenrightbigg (40) where Ai(x) is the Airy function [35] and ǫE= (¯h2e2E2/8m)1/3. It is instructive to verify that (40) satisfies the frequency sum rule/integraltext dωA0(ω) = 2π. This interaction-free but field-dependent re- tarded Green’s function GR ocan be obtained from the interaction-free and field-free Green’s func- tion by a simple Airy transformation [36]. This is an expression of the fact that the solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equation with constant electric field are Airy-functions. The retarded functions can therefore be diagonalized within those eigen- solutions [37,29]. It can be shown that (40) re- mains valid even within a quasiparticle picture [36], where we have to replace simply the free dispersion k2/2mby the quasiparticle energy ǫk. E. The Problem of the ansatz In order to close the kinetic equation (36), it is necessary to know the relation between G>and G<. This problem is known as an ansatz and must be constructed consistently with the required ap- proximation of self-energy. Assuming the conven- tional KB ansatz [26] we have a relation between the two time Green functions and the distribution function G<(k, ω,r, t) =A(k, ω,r, t)f(k,r, t) G>(k, ω,r, t) =A(k, ω,r, t) (1∓f(k,r, t)).(41) This is quite good as long as the quasi-particle pic- ture holds and no memory effects play any role. As we shall see, the formulation of kinetic equations with high fields is basically connected with a care- ful formulation of retardation times. Therefore, the simple ansatz, called KB ansatz fails. Another obscure discrepancy is the fact that with the old ansatz, one has some minor differences in the resulting collision integrals compared with the results from the density operator technique. With the old ansatz, one gets just one half of all retardation times in the various time arguments [31,33]. This annoying discrepancy remained ob- scure until the work of Lipavsky, et al. [38] where an expression is given for the G<function in terms of expansion after various times. We can write in Wigner coordinatesG<(p, t, τ) =f(p, t−|τ| 2)A(p, τ, t). (42) This generalized- Kadanoff- Baym (GKB) - ansatz is an exact relation as long as the selfenergy is taken in Hartree- Fock approximation. To- gether with the requirement of gauge invariance of Sec. III B and using the quasiparticle spectral func- tion (40) with quasiparticle energies ǫkinstead of k2/2m, the GKB ansatz finally reads G<(k, τ,r, t) = exp/braceleftbigg −i ¯h/parenleftbigg ǫkτ+e2E2 24mτ3/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg ×f/parenleftbigg k−eE|τ| 2,r, t−|τ| 2/parenrightbigg . (43) In order to get more physical insight into this ansatz one transforms into the frequency represen- tation G<(k, ω,r, t) = 2∞/integraldisplay 0dτf(k−eEτ 2, t−τ 2) ×cos/parenleftbigg ωτ−ǫ(k,r, t)τ ¯h−e2E2 24m¯hτ3/parenrightbigg . (44) Neglecting the retardation in fone recovers the or- dinary ansatz (41) with the spectral function (40). The generalized ansatz takes into account history by an additional memory. This ansatz is superior to the Kadanoff-Baym ansatz in the case of high external fields in several respects [39]: (i) it has the correct spectral properties, (ii) it is gauge in- variant, (iii) it preserves causality, (iv) the quan- tum kinetic equations derived with Eq.(52) co- incide with those obtained with the density ma- trix technique [40,41,31], and (v) it reproduces the Debye-Onsager relaxation effect [10] . Other choices of ansatz can be appropriate for other physical situations. For a more detailed dis- cussion see [42]. F. Kinetic equation in dynamically screened approximation For Coulomb interaction it is unavoidable to consider screening if one does not want to obtain long range or short wave vector divergences. To obtain an explicit form for the kinetic equation we have to determine the selfenergy Σ>,<. The dy- namically screened approximation is given by ex- pressing the self energy by a sum of all ring dia- grams. The resulting kinetic equation is the quan- tum Lenard - Balescu equation, which has been derived for high fields in [36]. We give this approx- imation in exact time convolutions. The selfenergy is given in terms of the dynamical potential V 7Σ< a(k, t, t′) =/integraldisplaydq (2π¯h)3V< aa(q, t, t′)G< a(k−q, t, t′) (45) where the dynamical potential is expressed within Coulomb potentials Vab(q) V< aa(q, t, t′) =/summationdisplay dcVad(q)L< dc(q, t, t′)Vca(q) (46) via the density-density fluctuation L< ab(q, t, t′) =δab/integraldisplay d¯td¯¯t ×(Er)−1(q, t,¯t)L< aa(q,¯t,¯¯t)(Ea)−1(q,¯¯t, t′).(47) HereLis the free density fluctuation L< aa(q, t, t′) =/integraldisplaydp (2π¯h)3G< a(p, t, t′)G> a(p−q, t′, t) (48) andEr/athe retarded/ advanced dielectric func- tion Er/a(q, t, t′) =δ(t−t′)±iΘ[±(t−t′)]/summationdisplay bVbb(q) ×(L>(q, t, t′)−L<(q, t, t′)). (49) One easily convince oneself that this set of equa- tions (45-49) is gauge invariant. We can directly introduce this set of equations into the equation for the Wigner function (37) and obtain after some algebra for the in-scattering part of the collision integral Iin a(k, t) = 2/summationdisplay b/integraldisplaydq (2π¯h)3V2 ab(q)∞/integraldisplay 0dτ/integraldisplaydω 2π ×cos/bracketleftbigg (ǫa k−q−ǫa k−ω)τ+eaEqτ2 2ma/bracketrightbigg ×fa(k−q−eaEτ, t−τ)(1−fa(k−eaEτ, t−τ)) ×L< bb(q, ω, t−1 2τ) /vextendsingle/vextendsingleE(q, ω, t−1 2τ)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2(50) with the free density fluctuation (48) L< bb(q, ω, t) =−2/integraldisplaydp (2π¯h)3∞/integraldisplay 0dτ ×cos/bracketleftbigg (ω−ǫb p+ǫb p+q)τ+ebEqτ2 2mb/bracketrightbigg ×fb(p+q, t−1 2τ)(1−fb(p, t−1 2τ)).(51) The out-scattering term Ioutis given by f↔1−f. Here we used the ansatz (43) and have employedthe approximation t±1 2τ≈tin the density fluc- tuation (47) which corresponds to a gradient ap- proximation in times for the density fluctuations. Since the center of mass time dependence is car- ried only by the distribution functions in (47), this approximation is exact in the quasistationary case which we investigate in the next section. All inter- nal time integrations remain exact. Of course, for time dependent phenomenae we have to question this approximation. Eq. (50) represents the field dependent Lenard- Balescu kinetic equation [36] which was here slightly rewritten and which form will turn out to be very convenient for the later analytical in- tegration. Other standard approximations like the T-matrix [30] approximation resulting into a field dependent Bethe-Salpeter equation can be given. 1. Kinetic equation in statically screened approximation Using the static approximation for the dielec- tric function E(q,0, t) in (50), the kinetic equation for statically screened Coulomb potentials in high electric fields appears [10,31,36] ∂ ∂Tfa+eE∂ ∂kafa=/summationdisplay bIab Iab=2(2sb+ 1) ¯h2/integraldisplaydk′ adkbdk′ b (2π¯h)6δ(ka+kb−k′ a−k′ b) ×{fa′fb′(1−fa)(1−fb)−fafb(1−fa′)(1−fb′)} ×V2 s(ka−k′ a)∞/integraldisplay 0dτcos/braceleftig (ǫa+ǫb−ǫ′ a−ǫ′ b)τ ¯h −Eτ2 2¯h/parenleftbiggeaka ma+ebkb mb−eak′ a ma−ebk′ b mb/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg . (52) withfb=fb(kb−ebEτ, T −τ). The potential is the static Debye one Vs(p) =4πeaeb¯h2 p2+ ¯h2κ2(53) and the static screening length κis given by κ2=/summationdisplay c4πe2 cnc Tc(54) in the equilibrium and nondegenerated limit. Here Tcis the temperature of specie c, charge ec, spin scand mass mcrespectively. If we had used the conventional Kadanoff and Baym ansatz (41) we would have obtained a factor 81/2 in different retardations [31]. This would lead to no relaxation effect at all [10]. Furthermore it is assumed, that no charge or mass transfer will occur during the collision. Otherwise one would obtain an additional term in the cos - function propor- tional to τ3. Two modifications of the usual Boltzmann colli- sion integral can be deduced from (52): ( i)A broad- ening of the δ-distribution function of the energy conservation and an additional retardation in the center-of-mass times of the distribution functions. This is known as collisional broadening and is a result of the finite collision duration [43]. This ef- fect can be observed even if no external field is applied. It is interesting to remark that this colli- sional broadening ensures the conservation of the total energy [24]. If this effect is neglected one obtains the Boltzmann equation for the field free case. ( ii) The electric field modifies the broadened δ- distribution function considerably by a term proportional to τ2. This broadening vanishes for identical charge to mass ratios of colliding parti- cles. At the same time the momentum of the dis- tribution function becomes retarded by the elec- tric field. This effect is sometimes called intra- collisional-field effect. IV. FIELD EFFECTS ON CURRENT We are now interested in corrections to the parti- cle flux, and therefore obtain from (52) the balance equation for the momentum ∂ ∂t<ka>−naeaE=/summationdisplay b<kaIab B> . (55) Here we search for the relaxation field (5) which will be represented as renormalization of the external field Esimilar to the Debye-Onsager- Relaxation field in the theory of electrolyte trans- port [14–16]. This effect is a result of the deforma- tion of the two-particle correlation function by an applied electric field. To proceed we assume some important restric- tions on the distribution functions. First, we as- sume a nondegenerate situation, such that the Pauli blocking effects can be neglected. Second, to calculate the current for a quasistationary plasma we choose Maxwellian distributions analog to (10) fi(p) =ni 2si+ 1λ3 iexp/braceleftbigg −p2 2miTi/bracerightbigg (56) with the thermal wave length λ2 i= 2π¯h2/(miTi), the spin siand the partial temperature Tifor species iwhich can be quite different e.g. in a two - component system.A. Statically screened result Before we present the result for the dynamically screened approximation we want to give the static result. The momentum conservation in (52) can be carried out and we get for the relaxation field naeaδE EE=−/summationdisplay b(2sa+1)(2 sb+1) ×2 ¯h2/integraldisplaydqdQdk (2π¯h)9V2 s(q)∞/integraldisplay 0dτ(k+eaEτ) ×cos/bracketleftbigg/parenleftbiggq2 2ma¯h+kq ma¯h−qQ mb¯h/parenrightbigg τ−Eq 2¯h/bracketleftbiggeb mb−ea ma/bracketrightbigg τ2/bracketrightbigg ×/braceleftig fa(k)fb/parenleftig Q+q 2/parenrightig −fa(k+q)fb/parenleftig Q−q 2/parenrightig/bracerightig (57) where we have shifted the retardation into the dis- tribution functions. The second part of the distri- bution functions can be transformed into the first one by putting k+q→kandq→ −qwith the result naeaδE EE=/summationdisplay b2sasb ¯h2(2π¯h)9/integraldisplay dkdqdQfb(Q)fa(k) ×V2(q)q∞/integraldisplay 0dτcos/bracketleftbigg/parenleftbigg −q2 2µ¯h−kq ma¯h+qQ mb¯h/parenrightbigg τ +Eq 2¯h/bracketleftbiggeb mb−ea ma/bracketrightbigg τ2/bracketrightbigg (58) with the reduced mass µ−1= 1/ma+ 1/mb. The angular integrations can be carried out trivially and we get naeaδE EE=E E/summationdisplay bI1 I1=1 ¯h114π6/integraldisplay dqq3V2(q)∞/integraldisplay 0dτjs/parenleftbiggEq 2¯h/bracketleftbiggeb mb−ea ma/bracketrightbigg τ2/parenrightbigg ×sin(q2τ 2µ¯h)I2[a]I2[b] (59) with js( x) = (xcosx−sinx)/x2. The two integrals over the distribution functions I2can be done with the result I2[a] =¯hma(2sa+ 1) qτ∞/integraldisplay 0dkk f a(k) sin(kqτ ma¯h) = 2¯h3naπ2e−q2τ2Ta 2¯h2ma (60) and correspondingly I2[b]. We now introduce the new variables 9q= 2y/radicalbig µTab t=2Tabτ ¯h Tab=1 2/parenleftbiggmb ma+mbTa+ma ma+mbTb/parenrightbigg e=¯h√µE 4T3/2 ab/bracketleftbiggeb mb−ea ma/bracketrightbigg (61) and obtain I1=8nanbµ2Tab π2¯h4∞/integraldisplay 0dyy3V2(2y/radicalbig µTab) ∞/integraldisplay 0dtjs(yt2e)sin(y2t)e−y2t2. (62) Using the screened Debye potential (53) we finally obtain I1=8nanbe2 ae2 b TabI3 I3=∞/integraldisplay 0dzz3 (z2+ 1)2∞/integraldisplay 0dljs(xzl2)sin(z2lζ) ζe−z2l2. (63) Therein we used y=zζandl=tζwith the quan- tum parameter ζ2=¯h2κ2 4µTab(64) and the classical field parameter x=e ζ=E 2Tabκ/parenleftbiggma ma+mbeb−mb ma+mbea/parenrightbigg .(65) With this form (63) we have given an extremely useful representation because the field effects, con- tained in x, are separated from the quantum ef- fects, which are contained in ζ. The integral in (63) can be performed analytically in the classical limitζ→0. For the more general quantum case with arbitrary ζthe linear and cubic field effect can be given analytically and are discussed in [17]. We will not discuss them here. Performing the classical limit ζ→0 one obtains from (63) that [18,17] I3c=−πx 24F(|x|) F(x) =−3 x2/bracketleftbigg 3−x+1 1 +x−4 xln(1 + x)/bracketrightbigg .(66)Introducing the classical result (66) into (63) we find from (59) and (55) the following relaxation field ∂ ∂t<ka>−naeaE/parenleftbigg 1 +δEa E/parenrightbigg =naeaJR(E) (67) with δEa E=−eaπ 6κ/summationdisplay b4nbe2 b µabeb mb−ea ma/parenleftig Tb mb+Ta ma/parenrightig2F(|x|) (68) andxfrom (65). We see that for a plasma consist- ing of particles with equal charge to mass ratios, no relaxation field appears. The link to the known Debye- Onsager relaxation effect can be found if we assume that we have a plasma consisting of elec- trons ( me, ee=e) and ions with charge ei=eZ and temperatures Te=Ti=T. Then (68) reduces to δEa E=−κe2 a 6TZ(1+me miZ) (1+Z)(1+me mi)F/parenleftigg eE TκZ(1+me miZ) 1+me mi/parenrightigg =−e2κe 6T/braceleftigg 1 2+o(E) 3κT 2eE+o(1/E)2. (69) This formula together with the general form (68) is the main result of this chapter. It gives the classi- cal relaxation effect for statically screened approx- imation up to any field strength and represents a result beyond linear response. We see that in the case of single charged heavy ions the Debye result (1) is underestimated by a factor of two. B. Dynamically screened result The calculation of the current with the collision integral for dynamically screened potentials (50) can be performed analytically as well. For the quasistationary condition we can calculate the fre- quency integral in (50) analytically using the iden- tity [44] for the classical limit o(¯h) /integraldisplaydω 2πH(ω) ωImE−1(q, ω)=H(0) 2Re/parenleftbigg 1−1 E(q,0)/parenrightbigg (70) where we set H(ω) =ω/ImEand which relation is proven in appendix A. We will employ only classi- cal screening. The quantum result for screening is more involved and not yet analytically integrable. Observing that for the dielectric function (49) together with (56) holds 10lim ω→0ω ImE(q, ω)=q3 √π¯h3/parenleftigg/summationdisplay bκ2 b vb/parenrightigg−1 (71) with the partial screening length κ2 b= 4πe2 bnb/Tb and the partial thermal velocity v2 b= 2Tb/mb, we obtain for the current (59) after similar integra- tions as in chapter IVA instead of (63) we have Idyn 1=8κ2e2 ae2 bnanb√mamb√πµabTTaTb/summationtext cκ2c vcIdyn 3 Idyn 3=∞/integraldisplay 0dzz2 1 +z21/integraldisplay −1dxx∞/integraldisplay 0dldl1e−z2(l2+l2 1) ×1 ζcos[Mbζlz2+Bzl2x] cos[Maζl1z2−Azl2 1x].(72) Here we used the same dimensionless variables as in chapter IVA and the quantum parameter (64). Further we abbreviated A=eaE κTa,B=ebE κTb,Ma=/radicalig 2µT maTa,Mb=/radicalig 2µT mbTb. We like to remark that we neglect any field de- pendence on the screening Eitself here. As pre- sented in [39] a field dependent screening function can be derived. However, this field dependence gives rise to a field dependence starting quadrati- cally and will be not considered in this work. The classical limit of (72) can be performed again by ζ→0. We obtain Idyn 3=1 2AMaI[|A|,|B|]−(a↔b) (73) with the remaining 3-dimensional integral I[A, B] =∞/integraldisplay 0dzz3 z2+ 11/integraldisplay −1dxx2 A2x2+z2 ∞/integraldisplay 0dle−z2l2cos(Bzl2x). (74) 1. Linear response The linear response can be read of directly from (73) and is given by I[0,0] of (74). We obtain Idyn 3=π3/2 12(MaA−MbB) (75) and the linear relaxation field (68) takes the formδEdyn E=4eπκ 3/summationtext cκ2c/radicalig mc Tc/summationdisplay bnbe2 b/radicalbiggmamb TaTb ×/parenleftigg ea T3/2 a√ma−eb T3/2 b√mb/parenrightigg +o(E). (76) The difference to (68) becomes more evident if we consider again only electrons and ions with equal temperature δEdyn E=−κe2 6T2Z(1 +/radicalig me miZ) (Z+/radicalig me mi)+o(E).(77) The differences to (69) are obvious in the different mass dependence. This result overestimates the Debye result by a factor of two. 2. Complete classical result Now we are able to present a complete field de- pendence beyond linear response. The integral (74) can be done analytically, which is sketched in appendix B. The result reads I[A, B] =π3/2 6I[A, B] I[A, B] =3 2A3 4A(1−√ 1 +B B+A2+log(1 −A2)/radicalig 1 +B A +2 ArcTanh(1√ 1−B A)−ArcTanh(√ 1+B√ 1−B A) /radicalig 1−B A +−ArcTanh(1√ 1+B A) + ArcTanh(√1+B√ 1+B A) /radicalig 1 +B A  .(78) We obtain for (76) δEdyn a E=4eaπκ 3/summationtext cκ2c/radicalig mc Tc/summationdisplay bnbe2 b/radicalbiggmamb TaTb ×/parenleftigg ea T3/2 a√maI[A, B]−eb T3/2 b√mbI[B, A]/parenrightigg .(79) Expanding (78) in powers of Ewe recover (76). Once more we choose the case of electrons and ions with equal temperature and obtain δEdyn E=−κe2 6ǫ0T2Z(I[A, B] +/radicalig me miZI[B, A]) (Z+/radicalig me mi).(80) 11For single charged ions and big mass differences we can further simplify to δEdyn E=−κe2 6TF[eE κT] =−e2κe 6T  2 +o(E) 3κT√ 2eE+o(1/E)2 F[x] =3 x3/parenleftigg 2/parenleftbig −2x+ 3/parenleftbig −1 +√1 +x/parenrightbig/parenrightbig √1 +x +√ 2/parenleftbigg −ArcTanh(1√ 2) + ArcTanh(√1 +x√ 2)/parenrightbigg +x2+ log(1 −x2)√ 2/parenrightbigg = 2 + o(E). (81) This result will be compare with the statically screened result (69) and the hydrodynamical re- sult (24) in section IVC. C. Thermally averaged dynamically screened result We will now give an approximative treatment of the dynamical screening used in [8]. This ap- proximation consists into the replacement of the dynamical screening in the collision integral (50) which is E(ω, q)−2by (1 + κ2Vaa(q)/4π)−1. This represents a thermal averaging [44] of E−2which can be proven easily with the help of appendix A. We obtain the relaxation effect of (68) and (69) but with a different field function F Fdyn(x) =−3 x2/bracketleftbigg 2−x−2 xln(1 + x)/bracketrightbigg =/braceleftigg2 +o(x) 3 x+o(1/x)2. (82) Therefore the relaxation effect (69) in linear re- sponse for single charged ions takes the form of (1) and twice the static screened result (69) and half of the dynamical screened result (81). As we see from figure 1 the different approxima- tions lead to very different results. The statically screened result (69) underestimates the Debye re- sult by factor 2 which is corrected by the ther- mal averaged treatment of the screening. If we calculate instead the complete dynamical screened result (77) or (80) we obtain twice the Debye re- sult (1) and the thermal averaged screened result. However there is a complete different charge de- pendence. We have to observe that the perfectly symmetric treatment of screening does not repro- duce the hydrodynamical result which is the On- sager result (2) for linear response.0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 eE/κT0.10.30.50.70.91.11.31.51.71.9δE/E [κe2/6T]dyn. screened hydrodyn. with background statical screened therm. av. dyn. screened hydrodyn. without background FIG. 1. The nonlinear Debye-Onsager relaxation ef- fect vs. scaled electric field for an electron and single charged ion system. The hydrodynamical approxima- tion (24) leads to the Onsager result (2) for small field strength 2 −√ 2. The statically screened result (68) or (69) leads to half the Debye result (1). The ther- mally averaged approximation of the dynamical screen- ing (82) leads to the Debye result while the full dy- namically screened approximation (81) leads to twice the Debye result. Also the hydrodynamical result (28) without background leads to twice the Debye result. D. Asymmetric dynamical screened result We want now to proceed and ask under which assumptions the Onsager result (2) might be re- produced. Following the results we saw from the hierarchy we have consequently to treat the elec- trons (specie a) and ions (all other species) asym- metrically. This we will perform in the same spirit as Onsager in that the ions have to be treated dy- namical (as before) but the electrons are screened statically. This means we consider as the potential not the bare Coulomb one but a statically screened Debye potential for specie a. The ions (all other species) will then form the dynamical screening. In com- parison with the chapter before we can perform all steps analogously except two modifications, eq. (85) and (88). First we observe that instead of (71) we have now lim ω→0ω ImE(q, ω)=qvb(q2+ ¯h2κ2 e)√π¯h3κ2 b(83) which leads to a replacement of the sum /summationdisplay cκ2 c vc→κ2 vi(84) 12in the for-factor of (72) and (79). This leads in the limit of big mass differences to a for-factor in (77) and (80) respectively modification I :Z 1 +Z. (85) The second modification is that in (72) one has to replace z2 1 +z2→z2 1 +z2z2 q+z2 =q q−1z2 q+z2−1 q−1z2 1 +z2(86) with q=κ2 a κ2. (87) This shows that in the end results (79), Eq. (80) has to be changed modification II : I[A, B]→√q q−1I[A√q,B√q]−1 q−1I[A, B].(88) Particularly we obtain for the linear response result (77) where for electron-ion plasma q= 1/(Z+ 1) and δEasy E=δEdyn EZq√q+ 1 =−κe2 3TZq√q+ 1+o(E) (89) which agrees with (21) if we consider that the mo- bilities are very different bi/be→0 in (22). The same result we obtain from the thermally averaged result (66) since there appears no such function as (83) and therefore the modification I of (85) does not apply but solely the modification II of (88). We therefore obtain (69) but Fdyn asy(x) = 2Fdyn(x)−√ 2Fdyn(√ 2x) =  2−√ 2 +o(x) 3 2x+o(1/x)2(90) withFdynof (82). The linear response leads then exactly to the same result as from the dynamical screening (89), i.e. the Onsager result with the same charge dependence. The fact that we reproduce the classical Onsager result with the same charge dependence can be considered as very satisfactory. The more sincewe have seen how many different considerations are possible. Please note that the special case Z= 1 could lead occasionally to a seemingly agree- ment between different treatments. We think that the charge dependence incriminates different treat- ments. 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 eE/κT0.00.20.40.6δE/E [κe2/6T]dyn. asymmetrical screened hydrodyn. with background thermod. av. asymmetrical screened FIG. 2. The different asymmetric screened approxi- mations for the relaxation effect versus field strength. The hydrodynamical result (24) is compared with the thermally averaged asymmetric screened result of (90) as well as the asymmetric screened one of (88). In figure 2 we see that the asymmetrical screened result (80) with (88) approaches the hydrodynami- cal or Onsager result (2) rather well for small fields while it is too low at high fields. On the other hand the thermally averaged symmetrical screened re- sult (90) agrees with the hydrodynamical approx- imation (24) in the low and high field limit. Why the hydrodynamical result cannot be reproduced completely within the kinetic theory remains still a puzzle. Probably the remaining difference is due to the neglect of the field effect on the screening itself [39]. V. RANGE OF APPLICABILITY During the derivation of the quantum kinetic equations there has been assumed the gradient ap- proximations which restricted the spatial gradients of the system. Here we want to discuss up to which field strength this assumption is justified. The electric field is limited to values x << 1 for xfrom (65). This can be deduced from the expres- sion for the dynamical screened result (81). The expression has a remove-able singularity at x= 1. Therefore we see a smooth curve. Nevertheless this is the field strength where something is happening. 13For equal masses and temperatures of plasma com- ponents this condition translates into E <κT e. (91) We interpret the occurrence of such singular point that no thermal distributions are pertained in the system. Then we have to take into account non- thermal field dependent distributions which have been employed to study nonlinear conductivity [45–47]. The condition (91) allows for different physical interpretations. Within the picture of the screen- ing cloud we can rewrite (91) into eE < mv2 th rD. (92) This means that a particle moving on the radius of the screening cloud rD= 1/κwith thermal velocity v2 th=T/mshould not be pulled away by the acting field force. We can discuss this limit also via the energy density which can be reached in a system by the applied field. We can reformulate once more the condition (91) to find equivalently E2 4π< nT. (93) This means that we have essentially non-thermal effects to be expected if the energy density of the field becomes comparable with the thermal energy density. The validity criterion (91) can now be used to check the weak space inhomogeneity which has been assumed during our calculation. Quasi- equi- librium in charged systems with external fields can only be assumed if the field current is accompanied by an equivalent diffusion current jfield=eµEn =−jdiff=eDdn dx(94) using the Einstein condition µ=eD/T one gets eE=T1 ndn dx. (95) Combining this elementary consideration with our condition (91) we obtain a limitation for space gra- dients dn d(κ x)< n (96) where our treatment of field effects and local equi- librium is applicable.VI. SUMMARY The nonlinear relaxation field of a charged sys- tem under the influence of high electric fields is in- vestigated. The local equilibrium or hydrodynam- ical approach starting from the classical BBGKY hierarchy is compared with the results from the quantum kinetic equations. We come to the same conclusion considering the hydrodynamical approximation or the kinetic theory that a perfectly symmetric two compo- nent plasma will lead to a different relaxation ef- fect than the case where we consider the mov- ing charge asymmetrically from the screening sur- rounding. In the hydrodynamic approach this has been achieved by friction with a background, in the kinetic approach we have realized it due to asym- metric screening. Within this asymmetric treat- ment the limit to a one component plasma which would be to set the ion charge to Z=−1 leads to a non-vanishing finite quantity. Oppositely in the perfectly symmetrical treatment this limit vanishes in that the relaxation field vanishes as it should. The perfectly symmetrical treatment of species in the system leads to twice the Debye result different from the Onsager result in linear response. Different approximations of the kinetic ap- proaches are compared and discussed. We found that the symmetrical treatment of species as well as the asymmetrical treatment leads to the same corresponding results as the hydrodynamical ap- proach for linear response. But for higher field strengths there appear minor differences which are probably due to the neglect of the field dependent screening itself. The thermally averaged approx- imation of screening has the advantage to agree for low and high fields with the hydrodynamical of local equilibrium approach. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wants to thank warmly Jens Ortner who has contributed the hydrodynamical approach with background. Also many comments regarding the manuscript are gratefully acknowledged. Last but not least Gerd R¨ opke is thanked for stimmulat- ing intellectual disagreements which have provoked this work. APPENDIX A: INTEGRALS OVER DIELECTRIC FUNCTIONS Here we proof a very useful relation, which has been given in [44]. Therefore we consider the fol- 14lowing integral including the dielectric function I=/integraldisplaydω 2πH(ω) ωImǫ−1(ω) =/integraldisplaydω 4πi/parenleftbigg1 ω+iη+1 ω−iη/parenrightbigg H(ω)(f−−f+) (A1) where f+= 1−1/ǫandf−= (f+)∗. In the following we will assume that the function H(ω) is analytical and vanishes with ∼ω−2for large ω. Since f±(ω) has no poles in the lower/upper half plane we have the identity /integraldisplaydω 2πiH(ω)f±(ω) (ω±iη)=∓f±(0)H(0) (A2) and all other combinations of f±with the denomi- nator vanish. If we would use the quantum dielec- tric function ǫwe would have to add the residue of the poles at the Matsubara frequencies. Because we calculate only with the classical dielectric func- tion we can use (A2) With the help of the relation (A2) we compute easily for (A1) I=1 2H(0)Re/parenleftbigg 1−1 ǫ(0)/parenrightbigg (A3) which proves relation (70). APPENDIX B: AN INTEGRAL Here we calculate the integral (74) I[a, b] =∞/integraldisplay 0dzz3 z2+ 11/integraldisplay −1dxx2 a2x2+z2 ×∞/integraldisplay 0dle−z2l2cos(bzl2x). (B1) The variable substitutions l→pbyp=√zl,x→ zbyz=yxandp→ebyp√x=lleads to I[a, b] = 21/integraldisplay 0dx∞/integraldisplay 0dyy5/2 y2x2+ 1x3 a2+y2∞/integraldisplay 0dee−ye2cos(be2) =∞/integraldisplay 0dyy1/2 a2+y2/parenleftbigg 1−log(1 + y2) y2/parenrightbigg∞/integraldisplay 0dee−ye2cos(be2) (B2) where the trivial x- integration has been carried out. The variable substitution e−>→qby√ye= qandy→zbyy= 1/zleads toI[a, b] =1 a2∞/integraldisplay 0dqe−q2∞/integraldisplay 0dycos(bq2z)1−z2log(1+1 z2) z2+1 a2. (B3) Now we proceed and use an integral calculated in the next subsection B1 ∞/integraldisplay −∞dyeicy1−y2log(1 +1 y2) y2+1 a2= 2π1/integraldisplay 0dxx2e−cx 1 a2−x2 +aπe−c/a(1 +log(1−a2) a2) (B4) to obtain for (B3) I[a, b] =π3/2 4a1 +log(1−a2) a2/radicalbig b/a +π3/2 2a21/integraldisplay 0dxx2 (1 a2−x2)√ 1 +bx.(B5) The last integrals is trivial and we end up with (78). 1. Another Integral Our task remains now to solve the integral I=∞/integraldisplay −∞dyeicy1−y2log(1 +1 y2) y2+1 a2. (B6) Because the complex function log(1 + 1 /y2) has a cut from (0 , i) we perform the integration along the path as depicted in figure 3 and write −r/integraldisplay R+R/integraldisplay r+CR+Cr+/integraldisplay I+/integraldisplay II = 2πiRes/bracketleftigg 1−y2log(1 +1 y2) y2+1 a2, i/a/bracketrightigg =πae−c/a(1 +log(1−a2) a2). (B7) It is now easy to proof that in the limit r→0 and R→ ∞ the integration parts Cvanish. Since the first two parts of (B7) represent just the desired integral Iwe have to calculate /integraldisplay I+/integraldisplay II=r/integraldisplay i+rdyeicy1−y2log(1 +1 y2) y2+1 a2 15+i−r/integraldisplay −rdyeicy1−y2log(1 +1 y2) + 2πi y2+1 a2 =−2π1/integraldisplay 0dxx2e−cx 1 a2−x2. (B8) Using (B8) and (B7) we obtain just (B4). i R -r -RI IICR r C r FIG. 3. The complex integration path for the inte- gral (B6). [1] H. Haug and A. P. Jauho, Quantum Kinet- ics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1996). [2] W. Theobald, R. H¨ aßner, C. W¨ ulker, and R. Sauerbrey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 298 (1996). [3] W. D. Kraeft, D. Kremp, W. Ebeling, and G. R¨ opke, Quantum Statistics of Charged Particle Systems (Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1986). [4] Y. Kluger, J. M. Eisenberg, and B. Svetitsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 2, 333 (1993). [5] B. B. Kadomtsev, Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 33, 151 (1958), sov. Phys. -JETP 33,117(1958). [6] Y. L. Klimontovich and W. Ebeling, Jh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 63, 904 (1972). [7] W. Ebeling, Ann. Phys. 33, 5 (1976). [8] W. Ebeling and G. R¨ opke, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 36, 429 (1979). [9] G. R¨ opke, Phys.Rev.A 38, 3001 (1988). [10] K. Morawetz and D. Kremp, Phys. Lett. A 173, 317 (1993). [11] A. Esser and G. R¨ opke, Phys. Rev. E. 58, 2446 (1998). [12] P. Debye and E. H¨ uckel, Phys. Zeitsch. 15, 305 (1923). [13] L. Onsager, Phys. Zeitsch. 8, 277 (1927). [14] H. Falkenhagen, Elektrolyte (S. Hirzel Verlag, Leipzig, 1953). [15] H. Falkenhagen, W. Ebeling, and W. D. Kraeft, inIonic Interaction , edited by Petrucci (AcademicPress, New York and London, 1971), Chap. 1, p. 1. [16] D. Kremp, D. Kraeft, and W. Ebeling, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 18, 246 (1966). [17] K. Morawetz, Contrib. to Plasma Physics 37, 195 (1997), errata:37,4. [18] J. Ortner, Phys. Rev. E 56, N5 (1997). [19] N. N. Bogoliubov, J. Phys. (USSR) 10, 256 (1946), transl. in Studies in Statistical Mechanics , Vol. 1, editors D. de Boer and G. E. Uhlenbeck (North- Holland, Amsterdam 1962). [20] Y. L. Klimontovich and W. Ebeling, Jh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 43, 146 (1962). [21] P. Danielewicz, Ann. Phys. (NY) 152, 239 (1984). [22] V. ˇSpiˇ cka and P. Lipavsk´ y, Phys. Rev. Lett 73, 3439 (1994). [23] V. ˇSpiˇ cka and P. Lipavsk´ y, Phys. Rev. B 52, 14615 (1995). [24] K. Morawetz, Phys. Lett. A 199, 241 (1995). [25] P. Lipavsk´ y, F. S. Khan, F. Abdolsalami, and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B 43, 4885 (1991). [26] L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym, Quantum Statistical Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1962). [27] L. V. Keldysh, Zh.exper.teor.Fiz. 47, 1515 (1964). [28] C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum field theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990). [29] R. Bertoncini and A. P. Jauho, Phys.Rev.B 44, 3655 (1991). [30] K. Morawetz and G. R¨ opke, Zeit. f. Phys. A 355, 287 (1996). [31] A. P. Jauho and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B 29, 1919 (1984). [32] G. D. Mahan, Phys.Rep. 145, 251 (1987). [33] A. P. Jauho, in Quantum Transport in Semi- conductors , edited by D. Ferry and C. Jacoboni (Plenum Press, New York, 1991), Chap. 7. [34] F. S. Khan, J. H. Davies, and J. W. Wilkins, Phys, Rev. B 36, 2578 (1987). [35] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Pocketbook of mathematical functions (Verlag Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt/Main, 1984). [36] K. Morawetz, Phys. Rev. E 50, 4625 (1994). [37] R. Bertoncini, A. M. Kriman, and D. K. Ferry, Phys.Rev.B 40, 3371 (1989). [38] P. Lipavsk´ y, V. ˇSpiˇ cka, and B. Velick´ y, Phys. Rev. B34, 6933 (1986). [39] K. Morawetz and A. P. Jauho, Phys. Rev. E 50, 474 (1994). [40] I. B. Levinson, Fiz. Tverd. Tela Leningrad 6, 2113 (1965). [41] I. B. Levinson, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 57, 660 (1969), [Sov. Phys.–JETP 30, 362 (1970)]. [42] K. Morawetz, P. Lipavsk´ y, and V. ˇSpiˇ cka, Phys. Rev. B (2000), sub. cond-mat/0005287. [43] S. K. Sarker, J. H. Davies, F. S. Khan, and J. W. Wilkins, Phys, Rev. B 33, 7263 (1986). [44] Y. L. Klimontovich, Kinetic theory of nonideal gases and nonideal plasmas (Academic Press, New York, 1975). 16[45] K. Morawetz, M. Schlanges, and D. Kremp, Phys. Rev. E 48, 2980 (1993). [46] D. Kremp, K. Morawetz, M. Schlanges, and V. Rietz, Phys. Rev. E 47, 635 (1993). [47] K. Morawetz and D. Kremp, Phys. Fluids B 1, 225 (1994). 17

arXiv:physics/0005051v1 [physics.hist-ph] 19 May 2000Submitted to Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics . Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” Yair Guttmann Philosophy Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Holger Lyre Institut f¨ ur Philosophie, Ruhr-Universit¨ at Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany, e-mail: holger.lyre@ruhr-uni-b ochum.de May 2000 Abstract. We propose a distinction between the physical and the mathe- matical parts of gauge field theories. The main problem we fac e is to uphold a strong and meaningful criterion of what is physical. We like to call it “Field’s dilemma” , referring to Hartry Field’s nominalist proposal which we c onsider to be inadaequate. The resolution to the dilemma, we believe , is implicitly provided by the so-called fiber bundle formalism. We shall de monstrate, in de- tail, that the bundle structure underlying modern quantum a nd gravitational gauge field theories allows for a genuine distinction betwee n the physically significant and the merely mathematical parts of these theor ies.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 2 Contents 1 The emergence of “Field’s dilemma” 3 2 Fiber bundles 7 2.1 The direct product and its generalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.2 The definition of fiber bundles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3 Different types of fiber bundles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.3.1 Sections and coordinate bundles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.3.2 Principal bundles and associated vector bundles . . . . . . . . 10 2.4 Connections on a principal fiber bundle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3 Gauge field theories 14 3.1 General conceptual and terminological issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.2 Quantum gauge field theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 3.2.1 Dirac-Maxwell theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3.2.2 Yang-Mills theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.3 Gravitational gauge field theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3.1 The gravitational gauge principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3.2 Objects and principles in general relativity . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4 The resolution of “Field’s dilemma” 26 4.1 Five questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 4.2 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 3 1 The emergence of “Field’s dilemma” In his book Science without Numbers Hartry Field (1980) raises an important ontological issue. We believe in the existence of theoretical entities, Field c laims, because they are indispensable. We need them in order to explain phenomena which need to be exp lained. However, our scientific theories in general and physical theories in particular are formulated using, also, a mathematical vocabulary: functions, transformations, integrals, deri vatives and, of course, real and complex numbers appear in the formulation of every theory in physics . And, it seems that these math- ematical entities, too, are needed in order to construct exp lanations. Does it not follow, then, that we should be committed to the existence of these seeming ly indispensable mathematical entities for the same reason that makes us believe in the real ity of theoretical entities? The answer, says Field, is that the “purely mathematical” part o f physics is not truly indispensable for explanatory purposes. Let Tbe the physical part of a theory and let Sbe its mathematical part. IfAis a physical fact which needs explanation, says Field, and i t can be explained in terms ofS+T, it can be explained in terms of Talone. The inclusion of Sis merely a matter of convention. Hence, we do not have to worry about the ontolo gy of its objects. On this level of abstraction Field’s question strikes us as a very important one and his general strategy for answering it seems promising. Indeed, it seems that a significant advancement in our understanding of physics will be achieved if we could ide ntify and characterize the part of theoretical physics which stands for real physical process es and distinguish it from the merely mathematical and, hence, the “contentless” part of physics to use Field’s own terminology. Our next step, then, is to outline Field’s specific strategy. It i s in this strategy that Field sees the merit of his account. LetTandSbe, respectively, the “physical” and the “mathematical” pa rts of a theory. LetAbe a “nominalistically statable” assertion A(Ais a statement whose quantifiers were restricted to range only on non-mathematical objects). Fie ld’s strategy for demonstrating that Sis dispensable is to prove that if Ais a semantic consequence of S+Tit is a consequence of Talone. Such a demonstration establishes that S+Tis a conservative extension of T, namely that every model of S+Tis also a model of Talone. Field claims that if T+Sis proven to be a conservative extension of T,Sis thereby shown to be “contentless”; it does not place any significant constraints on the models of T+Sthat could distinguish them from models of Talone. Indeed, writes Field, “ ... it would be extremely surprising if it were discovered th at standard mathematics implied that there are 106non-mathematical objects or that the Paris commune was defeated; and were such discovery to be made all but unreg enerate rationalists would take this as showing that standard mathematics needed revision. Good mathematics is conservative. ” (Field, 1980, p. 13). Of course, says Field, we need to assume that standard mathematics is consistent (otherwise Swould not have any non-trivial models). This assumption, it self, cannot be proven conclusively. However, we all believe that standa rd mathematics, being a very useful theory, must be consistent. Once this assumption is made, sa ys Field, it is relatively easy to prove that standard mathematics is conservative: “ Indeed, ... the gap between the claim of consistency and the full claim of conservativeness is, in th e case of standard mathematics, a very tiny one. ” (Field, 1980, p. 13). This is certainly an interesting obse rvation. Regarding the issue of the truth of mathematics Field claims that it is a mute point. Mathematics can be considered true if mathematical entities are assumed to exi st. The main reason for believing inFiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 4 the existence of mathematical objects, says Field, is that t hey are indispensable for explanatory purposes. But since Field has supposedly shown that mathema tical entities are not needed for explaining physical facts he regards the issue of mathemati cal truth as being simply irrelevant. A critique of Field’s argument necessitates a full discussi on of his “nominalistic reconstruc- tion” of various physical theories. This undertaking, howe ver, is not necessary in the present context; the critique of Field’s theory is not the main focus of this article. What we want to present here is another way of answering Field’s question, n amely, how to divide physics into a “truly physical part” and a “merely mathematical” part and then demonstrate that the for- mer should be regarded as representing real and objective ph enomena while the latter is to be regarded as dispensable “conceptual scaffolding”. The de tails of our analysis, though, are significantly different. Firstly, the sense in which physica l theories are divided into the physical and the mathematical parts is completely different from the o ne Field employed. Field uses logical tools to affect the decomposition; we, on the other ha nd, shall use the mathematics of fiber bundles to formulate our constructions. Secondly, our characterization of what is physical is quite different from Field’s. For our purposes the physica l part of the theory is the one with experimental consequences. This is a much stricter criteri on than the one which underlines Field’s argument. Because of our criterion we are led to cons ider the local gauge covariance principle as the paradigm of what is physical. We believe tha t this feature of our account brings us much closer to the physicist’s way of thinking. Finally, t he method of proving that various mathematical constructions are dispensable vary significa ntly from Field’s. First, we have noth- ing that is analogous to the proof of conservative extension . We believe that what makes the mathematical part of the theory different from the physical p art is not that we can do without it. Instead, one should show that a different choice of mathem atical formulation would not have led to a theory with different experimental consequences. Ultimately, our account should be judged on its own merit; it is not even absolutely clear that it is an alternative to Field’s approach and not a compli mentary set of observations. We do, however, believe that Field’s account suffers from some s erious problems. Consequently, we feel the need to “save” Field’s general strategy from the spe cific interpretation he assignes to it. In this sense, and only in this sense, we are engaged in a criti que of Field’s account. The problems in Field’s account to which we alluded are the fo llowing: (i) The formulations which Field offers to various physical t heories do not have much to be recommended for them, that is, apart from their value for the nominalist. Although Field claims that his formulations yield “reasonably attra ctive” theories we believe that physicists would find them quite objectionable. (ii) The notion of semantic consequence which Field uses is a n abstract and non-constructive notion. He does not show us how to actually derive any “nomina listically statable” asser- tion fromTalone. Hence, such assertions do not, stricly speaking, rec eive an explanation fromTalone. (iii) Field’s idea of the physical is quite inflationary. For instance, he regards spacetime points as physical entities. In this respect his attempt to “physic alize geometry” is in stark contrast to the general-relativistically motivated movem ent to “geometrize physics”.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 5 (iv) More generally, the very logic of Field’s argument mand ates that he uses a very loose and weak notion of the physical so that the resulting theory Twill be powerful enough to entail the consequences of T+S. This way of thinking is, again, in opposition to the line of thinking of the physicist. As we remarked earlier , we believe that the term physical assertion should be reserved only for those aspect s of physics which have empirical consequences. (v) Finally we do not believe, like Field does, that we can do w ithout mathematical concepts altogether nor do we think that this is what we need to prove in order to characterize the ontological difference between mathematical and physical e ntities. It might turn out that we cannot proceed without some mathematical structures and notations. What we need to demonstrate, in order to account for the difference betwee n the mathematical and the physical, is that had we chosen another mathematical “conve ntion” or construction, the experimentally testable part of the theory would have remai ned essentially unaffected. It is this type of invariance with respect to the choice of mathe matical description that allows us to conclude that there is no need to interpret the “merely m athematical” entities of the theory as physically real. All these problems are quite troublesome. There is, however , one issue that seems to us to deserve special attention. In discussing what criterion to use for what is uniquely a physical phe- nomenon many philosophers would tend to favor a relatively r igid criterion; in particular, there is, clearly, much to recommend about the idea that when we ass ert that a physical phenomenon occurs, we must show that the assertion has empirical conseq uences. On the other hand, in the interest of affecting a workable distinction between the “ge nuinely physical” and the “merely mathematical”, some of the same philosophers might be susce ptible to the pressure of employing an inclusive criterion. In this context even a loose charact erization of what is physical, if it yields a distinction between mathematics and physics, seems prefe rable to no distinction at all. This pressure is particularly strong for those who look for a proo f that the merely mathematical part of physicsSis dispensible. By “smuggling” into the physical part Tlarge portion of S+Tone obtains a relatively strong Tand a relatively weak S, making it easier to prove that S+Tis a conservative extension of T. A similar motivation lurks behind much of what is attractiv e in various forms of substantivalism. When one regards space-t ime points as physical entities one leaves very little in the purely mathematical part of physic s. This residue seems to play a merely faciliatory role akin to that played by the logical connecti ves; therefore the inflationary criterion for the physical leaves us with very little temptation to att ach to it any ontological significance. The price, though, is in our opinion much too high. Therefore , we shall try to find a way around it. To sum up, then, we are faced with a double pressure. On the one hand we would like to employ a relatively restrictive criterion of what is physic ally significant; but on the other we are pressured in the opposite direction to affect a distincti on between the mathematical and the physical parts. This is what we propose to call “Field’s dilemma” . A large portion of this article is dedicated to show how to escape this dilemma, that is, how to uphold a restrictive criterion of what is physical while making it possible to dis tinguish beween the mathematical part of physics and its truly physical parts.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 6 Let us now describe the contents of this paper. Our main purpo se is to present a new conception of the ontology of gauge field theories (the most f undamental field theoretic approach of physics today). This conception, we believe, is implicit in the fiber bundle formalism. The construction of fiber bundles makes it possible to distingui sh the “merely mathematical” aspects of physical theories from their “truly physical” parts. Fro m this aspect stems the importance of fiber bundles for the discussion of the ontology of physica l theories, as we see it. The gauge principle has a precise and uniform representation in fiber b undle theoretic terms. Therefore, a careful study of these structures will allow us to better un derstand this principle and to distinguish between gauge principle and “merely mathemati cal” covariance principles. To those who are acquainted with the bundle formalism there i s no need to exalt its virtue at length. It is enough to mention that, at least in principle , every physical field theory can be given a specific formulation using the construction of the ap propriate fiber bundle. Therefore, one may think of the fiber bundle formalism as the lingua universalis of modern physics. The basic ideas and definitions of bundle theory have been presen t in the mathematical literature for well over fifty years. These ideas are classified under the hea dings of differential geometry and algebraic topology, two disciplines which gave rise to some of the most important mathematical developments of the twentieth century. However, the applic ation of these ideas to physics are much more recent. Only in the last two or three decades did the power of these methods, as they apply to mathematical physics, become evident. Mathem atical physicists who used them managed to derive impressive results which could not have be en obtained in other ways. Since then the study of fiber bundles has become part of the standard education of young physicists. These developments lend some urgency to the project of prope rly understanding the ideas behind the fiber bundle formalism. The investigation of these ideas and their applications to physics will occupy the center part of this paper.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 7 2 Fiber bundles In this chapter we try to give a brief and self-contained intr oduction to the mathematics of fiber bundles. Our key motivation is the idea of generalizing the d irect product and its set theoretic background; in the later section of this chapter we shall sho w the connection of this presentation with more physics-oriented presentations such as Drechsle r and Mayer (1977) and Trautman (1984). 2.1 The direct product and its generalization Of the many contributions of set theory to the foundations of mathematics the set-theoretic definition of mathematical functions which emerged early in the development of set theory stands as a milestone. Until the end of the 19th century mathe maticians thought of functions as rules of correspondence. That is, if x∈ /CGis a member of the domain of f, the expression f(x) was considered to be a procedure or a recipe to obtain y=f(x) fromx. As a consequence, in order to determine whether y=f(x) or not, one had to inquire into the meaning of the instruction underlying f. Such inquiries, by definition, cannot be completely precis e; therefore, a need was felt for a more rigorous definition of the concept of a mathematical function. As the reader undoubtedly knows, in set theory the function f: /CG→ /CHis identified with its “graph”Gf, that is, with the set of all ordered pairs1(x,y) such that f(x) =y(note thatGfis a subset of the direct product /CG× /CH). Hence, the question of whether y=f(x) can be answered by simply checking that ( x,y)∈Gf; imprecise “instructions” and “rules of correspondence” a re banished from the ontology of mathematics. If fis a well defined function, Gfis a well defined set and the question whether or not ( x,y)∈Gfhas an unambiguous answer. As a result of the following considerations, rather than inv estigatingf, we may investigate the relations between /CG, /CHand /CG× /CH. More precisely, we investigate/CG× /CH πxւ ց πy/CG /CH(1) whereπx(x,y) =xandπy(x,y) =y.πxandπyare called projections. In view of the founda- tional significance of the direct product construction it sh ould be interesting for philosophers of mathematics to find out how it can be generalized. Indeed, thi s is the motivating idea behind the fiber bundle formalism. As we shall see shortly, the gener alization of the direct product can be viewed as yet another conception of the nature of mathemat ical functions. The fundamental idea of the fiber bundle construction is to co ntinue investigating /CG, /CH,/CG× /CHandπxbut to give up πy, the projection into /CH. What could be a reason for giving up πy? The idea is that /CHhas an “additional layer of hidden structure” which is “indi spensable”, that is, in order to determine the values of fthis layer of structure has to be taken into account. Therefore, an adequate representation of the situation sho uld make the dependence on this layer of structure explicit. Let us think of the above mentioned la yer of structure as a group Gwhich 1An ordered pair can be identified with a simple set using, for e xample, the convention ( x,y) ={x,{y}}.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 8 operates2on /CH. We get/CG× /CH πxւ/CG G× /CH→ /CH(2) instead of (1). Now let x∈ /CGand let /CHx=π−1 x(x) ( /CHxis called the fiber over x). Let us now define a family of maps /CHx→ /CH. IfGis generated by a single element gall the elements of/CHare in one equivalence class and each of the elements of /CGis assigned with /CHx, an identical copy of /CH. IfGis generated by more than one element for every generating el ement ofGwe shall have another map /CHx→ /CH(in other words, the assignment of /CHx, the fiber over x, is “sensitive” to the operation of Gon /CH). 2.2 The definition of fiber bundles This somewhat imprecise description will allow us to give th e reader a primary concept of fiber bundles and an idea of the way they generalize the direct prod uct. A fiber bundle is a structure /an}b∇acketle{t /BX, /BU,π, /BY,G/an}b∇acket∇i}htwhich includes (i) The bundle space (or total space) /BX (ii) The base space /BU (iii) The fiber space /BY (iv) A mapping π: /BX→ /BUcalled projection (v) A group Gcalled structure group with a left action on /BY As we remarked /BYx=π−1(x) is called the fiber over x∈ /BU. Let us turn now to the issue of the generalization of the direc t product. Is it, indeed, a genuine generalization? If the point, where the definition o f fiber bundles departs from that of the garden variety of direct products, is whenever the “hi dden structure” over /CH, which is represented by the action of the group G, is taken into account, why can’t we simply define the quotient space3/CH/Gand a function f′: /CG→ /CH/Gwhich is to be investigated instead of f? Note that if we want to claim that behind the fiber bundle forma lism there is a new conception of mathematical functions there is some urgency to answer th is question in a convincing way. Is the fomalism we develop a genuinely new idea or is it merely a hyphaluted mathematical notation? There are two reasons for believing that we are engaged in a ge nuinely new body of ideas. First, as we shall see shortly, not every fiber bundle is equiv alent (in a precise mathematical sense which we shall define soon) to a direct product. Secondl y, the “hidden structure”, which 2We can think of the operation of Gas an equivalence relation ∼which is defined on /CH. Ify=gy′withg∈G, theny∼gy′. In general, this equivalence relation “decomposes” /CHinto equivalence classes, one for each of the elements which generate G. Each of the equivalence classes is the G-orbit of its members. 3The construction of /CH/Gcan be described as a choice of the “representative element” from each of the equivalent classes of /CHinduced by G.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 9 is coded by the action of the group G, should not be ignored; but we should not give up /CHand concentrate only on /CH/Geither. As we shall see later the invariance with respect to t he action ofGoften represents highly non-trivial physical facts. Thus, we should be prepared to retain the “superfluous structure” of /CHand think of G-covariance as a physical principle. If we rid ourselves of the “excess structure” too quickly we shall not be able to appreciate the difference between this covariance with respect to Gand other more trivial kinds of covariance without a physical meaning. The full significance of the last remarks w ill become clearer when we discuss some physical examples. 2.3 Different types of fiber bundles 2.3.1 Sections and coordinate bundles For a direct product, i.e. a structure /an}b∇acketle{t /CG, /CH, /CG× /CH,πx,πy/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, the following construction is always possible: let y0∈ /CHand/CGy0={(x,y) :πy(x,y) =y0}. (3) The set /CGy0is always well defined. /CGy0is called a global section of /CG× /CH. If /CGyand /CGy′are global sections corresponding to y,y′∈ /CH, there is a natural isomorphism ϕy,y′: /CGy0→ /CGy0, (x,y)→(x,y′). There is also a natural isomorphism ϕy: /CG→ /CGybetween /CGand /CGy, x→(x,y). Hence we may regard the various /CGyas “copies” of /CGattached to the various y∈ /CH. In case we give up πy, we give up the possibility of always having global sections at our disposal. Instead we make a weaker requirement, namel y, that for every x∈ /CGthere is a neighborhood Uxsuch that in the “sub-bundle” Ux× /CHwe can construct local sections . This requirement is called a local trivialization . As we shall see shortly the local trivialization requirement is, indeed, a weaker condition which does not al ways guarantee the existence of global sections. Let us describe with some detail how to construct fiber bundle s which satisfy the local trivialization condition. In such cases, each point of the b ase space is contained in an open neighborhood Usuch that the portion of the bundle “above” Uis isomorphic to a direct product. Note that in order to define such a fiber bundle we must confine ou r attention to those cases where the notion of an open neighborhood is well defined, that is, to differentiable manifolds or, at least, to topological spaces. Recall that a chart on a topological space Mis a homeomorphism f:U→VofU⊂M, an open set, onto an open subset V⊂ /CAn(nis called the dimension of f). Anatlasis a collection of charts whose domains cover M.Mis ann-dimensional manifold if it admits an n-dimensional atlas. Consider two charts f:U→Vandf′:U′→V′on ann-dimensional manifold M. We say thatfandf′areC∞compatible if the composit maps f◦f′ −1:f(U∩U′)→(U∩U′) andf′◦f−1: (U∩U′)→(U∩U′) are of class C∞(that is, they have well defined partial derivatives of all orders.) An atlas is of class C∞if all its charts are pairwise C∞compatible. The construction of a C∞atlas shows how to introduce a coordinate system into a topol ogical space. We use local charts to “import” into Mthe coordinate system of /CAn; these coordinates enable us to assign the objects of Ma location. The fact that the charts are C∞compatible guarantees a “smooth” transition from one coordinate patch to another.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 10 Using an analogous procedure we can show how to construct a fib er bundle from local patches. Let /BUbe the base manifold and {Un}a collection of subsets of /BUwhich cover /BU. Let /BXbe a fiber bundle with /BUas the base space, /BYthe “typical fiber” and π: /BX→ /BUa projection. Observe that for all n,π−1(Un) is a subset of /BX(clearly/uniontext nπ−1(Un) covers /BX). If we restrict our attention to locally trivial bundles we can a ssume that there is a diffeomorphism φn:π−1(Un)→Un× /BYnwhereπ−1(Un) is a subset of /BXand /BYnis the fiber associated with someb∈Un. Now consider two patches UnandUmwith a non empty intersection. Let φnm be the restriction of φnto theπ−1(Un∩Um), that isφnm:π−1(Un∩Um)→(Un∩Um)× /BYn. Similarly let φm:π−1(Um)→Um× /BYmand letφmn:π−1(Um∩Un)→(Um∩Un)× /BYmbe the restriction of φmtoπ−1(Un∩Um). Let us now define the composit diffeomorphism ρnm ρmn=φnm◦φ−1 mn: (Un∩Um)× /BYn→(Um∩Un)× /BYm, (4) which is called the transition function between the bundle charts φnmandφmn. Let us now consider three open patches Un,UmandUland restrict our attention to the intersection Un∩Um∩Ul. We need to know how to switch from one location to another. To this end we will define the transition functions ρnm,ρmlandρnlwhich correspond to the transitions Un→Um,Um→UlandUn→Ulrespectively. The transition from one coordinate patch to another should not depend on the path. Hence we require that ρnm◦ρml=ρnl. (5) This condition which is called the cocycle condition , makes it possible to define, for each transi- tion, a unique inverse transition. As we shall see shortly th e cocycle condition allows us to code the various transition functions as elements of a structure groupG. More precisely the condition makes it possible to associate with each g∈Gthe inverse element g−1such thatgg−1=id. To sum up, suppose that we are given a manifold /BUwith an open cover {Un}and we assign to eachb∈Unthe fiber /BYn. Suppose further that for each n,mwe can define the transition functionρnmand that the collection of such function satisfies the cocycl e condition. In such a case we can define a fiber bundle /BXby patching together the sets Un× /BYnby means of the transition functions ρnm. It can be shown that /BX, thus obtained, is a metrizable separable and locally compact space. In fact, /BXis, itself, a differentiable manifold; the domains of the cha rts of /BXareUn× /BY.π: /BX→ /BUis defined on each chart as a projection on the first element of t he product. 2.3.2 Principal bundles and associated vector bundles Our next step is to construct principal fiber bundles where th e action of the structure group is explicit. We shall do so by requiring that each of the fibers ca n be identified with the group G. In more pedestrian cases one must distinguish between G, taken as a set of operations which can be composed with one another and the domain of objects on whic h the members of Goperate. However, in the present case we are considering mathematica l objects with a dual character. On the one hand we are dealing with a topological space, on the other hand each g∈Gis an operation. The composition G×G→Gis defined as ( g1,g2)→g1g−1 2. It is required to be continuous with respect to the product topology on G×G. IfGhas, in addition, the structureFiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 11 of a differentiable manifold, then it is natural to require th at the composition is smooth. When this requirement is satisfied G is called a Lie group . Another requirement on Gis that it acts freely; that means that it does not have non-trivial fixed poi nts. Aprincipal bundle /C8is a structure /an}b∇acketle{t /C8,G, /BU,π/an}b∇acket∇i}htwhere /C8is a manifold on which the group Gacts freely. The projection π: /C8→ /BUis aC∞function from /C8onto /BU. /C8is assumed to fulfil the local trivialization condition: for every b∈ /BUthere is an open set U⊂ /BUand an isomorphism f:U×G→π−1(U) such that for every b∈Uandg,g′∈Gwe getπ(f(b,g)) =b andf(b,gg′) =f(b,g)g′. Note that a tight connection exists between the projection πand the orbits ofG. All the elements of /C8which are projected onto the same b∈Uare transformed into one another by the elements of G. In other words, the fibers of /C8are the orbits of Gand, at the same time, the set of elements which are projected onto th e sameb∈U. This observation motivates calling the action of the group “vertical” and the base manifold “horizontal”. We shall explain this choice of terminology further shortly. As we remarked earlier the requirement of local trivializat ion is not sufficient to guarantee that the fiber bundle is mathematically trivial. To clarify t his point let us state necessary and sufficient conditions for a fiber bundle to be trivial. In the ca se of principal fiber bundles these conditions are rather intuitive. Recall that a section of /C8is a diffeomorphism s: /BU→ /C8such thatπs=id. Now, /C8is isomorphic to the trivial bundle /an}b∇acketle{t /BU×G,G, /BU,π/an}b∇acket∇i}htif and only if it admits a global section. Indeed, consider the map f: /C8→ /BU×Gdefined byf−1(b,g) =s(b)g for allb∈ /BU,g∈G.fis aC∞bijection and, hence, an isomorphism. Note that, as far as principal bundles are concerned, the base manifold can be co nsidered as the quotient /C8/G. This point of view is equivalent to the construction using coordi nate patches. Historically, it was not immediately evident that that the definition of principal fib er bundles in terms of coordinate patches is equivalent to defining them in terms of a quotient s pace. To facillitate our understanding of the notion of mathemati cally trival fiber bundle let us take two examples. The base space, in both cases, is a circle S1with two coordinate patches U andU′(in order to cover a circle we need, at least, two patches). Th e fiber is, in both examples, the unit interval [0 ,1]. In the first example the structure group Ghas two generators eandr.e is an infintesimal translation and ris a rotation of the unit interval around its center. Because of the action of rafter a full circle the unit interval will be rotated by 180 de grees. Thus, the zero point will be identified with the other pole 1 and, vice versa, 1 will be identified with 0. As a consequence the construction will result in a M¨ obius strip , a non-trivial fiber bundle which does not admit a global section. In the second case the structure g roupG′has only one generator: the infintesimal shift e. The result, in this case, is a cylindrical fiber bundle; the c ylinder is a trivial fiber bundle which admits sections (however, as we shall disc uss later in greater detail, bundles which are trivial mathematically might be far from trivial f rom a physical point of view). Once we have defined a principal fiber bundle we can make an extr a step and construct fiber bundles which are associated with the principal bundle. The general idea is to represent the structure group in another structure (which is intended to b e used as a “typical fiber”), and assign copies of this structure to the points in the base spac e of the principal bundle. Because the main focus of this paper is not purely mathematical, rath er then defining an associated fiber bundle in the most general way we shall define the vector bundl e associated with a principal bundle. One example of an associated vector bundle is the tan gent bundle. Vector bundlesFiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 12 appear frequently in physical applications. Let /CEbe a vector space of dimension n, then, a representation of GinVis a mapping ρ:G× /CE→ /CE, (6) (g,v)→v′defines the action of Gon /CE. Let /C8×G/CE= ( /C8× /CE)/G. Now we can define the structure /an}b∇acketle{t /C8×G/CE,G, /BU,π/an}b∇acket∇i}htto be the vector bundle /BXassociated with the principal bundle /C8. When we assign to each point p∈ Mits tangent space /CCp, the union/uniontext/CCpis the tangent bundle T Mover the base manifold M. We shall discuss the tangent bundle further shortly. 2.4 Connections on a principal fiber bundle Connections are needed in order to formulate a “law” which de termines how various objects are transported from one point of a manifold to another. Even whe n we know how objects evolve along the base manifold (that is, if we know the spatiotempor al coordinates of the evolution), we still need to determine the evolution along the bundle man ifold. Hence, we need a method or a principle telling us how to “lift” a curve from the base ma nifold to the fiber bundle. Such a principle should enable us to define the notion of parallel t ransport. We shall discuss how to formulate these notions for a vector bundle associated with a principal bundle. This formulation is not the most general one but it contains most of the ideas on e encounters in the physics of fiber bundles. Now, we shall think of /C8as the bundle of linear frames LM. Letu∈ /C8andp∈ M such thatπ(u) =p. We wish to transport a vector from its origin at pto neighboring points along vectors emenating from p. Letv∈ /CCpMbe such a vector ( /CCpMis the collection of vectors tangent top∈ M). We expect the law of transport to fulfil the following condi tions: (i) It should depend smoothly on p(that is, ifp′is infintesimally near pthe evolution from p′can be expressed as an infintesimal variation on the evolutio n fromp). (ii) The law should allow us to define the parallel transport a long any vector v∈ TpM. (iii) Ifvis transported from utou′then, ifg∈G,ugshould be transported to u′g. Formally, in order to establish a connection, a vector space /C0u /C8⊂ /CCu /C8must be assigned to everyu∈ /C8( /CCu /C8is the vector space of the tangents at u, that is, /CCu /C8∈ /CC/C8). The conditions (i)-(iii) can now be formulated more precisely. (i)* The assignment must be smooth. (ii)* Let us define Θ uπ: /C0u /C8→ /CCπ(u)M. We require that Θ uπis an isomorphism for every u∈ /C8. (iii)* The assignment should be invariant with respect to th e action ofG: ifg∈Gand Φ g( /C0u /C8) is the result of the action of gon the members of /C0u /C8then Θ uΦg( /C0u /C8) = /C0ug /C8. Note that the isomorphism Θ uπallows us to “lift” any vector v∈ /CCpMto a unique vector in/CC/C8. More precisely, if π(u) =pandv∈ /CCpMwe may define the lift λuv∈ /C0u /C8by settingFiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 13 λuv= (Θ uπ)−1(v). We may define/CEu /C8={v∈ /CCu /C8| /CCu /C8(v) = 0} (7) as the space of all vectors tangent to the fiber of /C8throughu. This fact motivates the idea that/CEu /C8is the “vertical” part of /CCu /C8. Hence, the direct sum decomposition/CCu /C8= /CEu /C8⊕ /C0u /C8 (8) together with the isomorphism between /C0u /C8and /CCpMjustifies calling /C0u /C8the “horizontal” part of /CCu /C8. Now, a connection on /C8allows for a unique separation of the vertical and the horizontal part of /CCu /C8according to (8). Let gbe the Lie algebra of G, then the connection is defined as a g-valued one-form projecting /CCu /C8to /CEu /C8∼=g. Finally, we can define the horizontal lift of a parametrized c urveC: [0,1]→ M . Let C(0)∈ M andu∈ /C8withπ(u) =C(0). A horizontal lift ¯C: [0,1]→ /C8ofCsatisfies: (i) ¯C(0) =u, (ii)π(¯C) =C, (iii) the tangent to ¯Catt∈[0,1] is a member of /C0¯C(t). As we remarked earlier, the isomorphism between /C0¯C(t)and /CCC(t)Mjustifies calling ¯Ca horizontal lift of C. One may say that ¯Cis obtained by a parallel transport of ualong C. Generally, the fact that C(0) = C(1), that is, that Cis a closed loop does not guarantee that the horizontal lift ¯Cis a closed loop as well. It might be the case that ¯Cis not a closed loop and ¯C(0)/ne}ationslash=¯C(1). In general, ifC(0) = C(1) then ¯C(1) = ¯C(0)g, whereg∈G. The set of all g∈Gwhich can be obtained in this manner forms a subgroup of Gcalled the holonomy group of the connection at point C(0). We have now introduced the essential notions of fiber bundle m athematics and shall proceed to their applications in gauge field physics.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 14 3 Gauge field theories The previous section of this paper was devoted to the general mathematical concept of fiber bundles. In this section we will discuss the advantages of us ing fiber bundles in physics. Our demonstration is set in the realm of modern gauge field theori es. It is in this area of physics, perhaps the epitome of physics today, where our key assertio n must be proven. We need to show that the significant quantities of gauge field theories “ live in bundle spaces” rather than the spacetime base manifold. 3.1 General conceptual and terminological issues Let us start with a list of the main concepts occuring in gauge field theories. It will be useful to clarify the terminology needed for later discussions.4 (i) Covariance and invariance. The notions of covariance and invariance, which are crucial to our considerations, have been given different definitions and interpretations throughout the literature (in physics textbooks they are often used int erchangeably). We shall use the following terminology: covariance means form invariance of the equations of the theory with respect to some group of transformations , the so-called covariance group. In gauge field theories, we better speak of gauge covariance instead of gauge invariance. We shall therefore make a distinction between covariance and a loose r notion of a group invariance of certain objects of a given theory, which does not involve the form of the equat ions. (ii) Noether’s theorem. In order to understand gauge theories we must study the conne ction between global symmetries and conserved quantities. Such a connection is established by Emmy Noether’s first theorem: Noether’s theorem: Letφi(x)be a field variable ( iis the index of the field components), then the covariance of the action functio nalS[φ] =/integraltext L[φi(x),∂µφi(x)]d4xunder ak-dimensional Lie group implies the existence ofkconserved currents. (iii) Gauge postulate. The defining feature of gauge field theories is that they coupl e matter fields and interaction fields dynamically. The beautiful ide a of the gauge approach is to start with a free theory, and then “derive” the structure o f the coupling from the assumption that the following postulate is satisfied: Gauge postulate: The Lagrangian of a free matter field φi(x)should remain invariant under local gauge transformations φi(x)→φ′ i(x) =φ′ i[φi(x),αs(x)]. (iv) Gauge principle. The idea of gauging rests on postulating local gauge covaria nce instead of the corresponding global Noether covariance. This idea5is captured in the principle of local covariance : 4We also address some terminological issues which were first p resented in Lyre (1999). 5The general idea in a compact manner was first introduced by He rmann Weyl in his seminal paper from 1929; cf. O’Raifeartaigh (1995) for historical remarks.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 15 Gauge principle: The coupling of the Noether current corresponding to the glo bal gauge transformations of the Lagrangian of free matter field s can be introduced as the replacement of the usual derivative by the covariant d erivative∂µ→Dµ which corresponds to local gauge transformations. (v) Gauge transformations. We must distinguish between global gauge transformations (GTG) and localgauge transformations (GTL). Regarding GTL, we must furthe r dis- tinguish two subcategories6: a) matter field transformations, also called “gauge transfo rmations of the first kind” (GTL1), and b) gauge potential transformations, also called “gauge tra nsformations of the second kind” (GTL2). In quantum gauge field theories, the matter fields of transfor mations GTL1 describe the fundamental fermionic particles of the standard model, suc h as leptons and quarks7, whereas in gravitational gauge theories the “matter fields” are tangent vector fields associ- ated with reference frames (that is, a material system representing an observer, measu ring rods, and clocks). (vi) Bundle structure of gauge field theories. Modern gauge field theories are geometri- cally characterized as principal fiber bundles /C8, where the gauge fields “live”, and their associated vector bundles /BX, in which the matter fields “live”. Thus, in bundle theoretic terminology, the distinction between GTL1 and GTL2 (and the ir respective fields) reflects the distinction between /BXand /C8. Gauge potentials are connections on /C8, local sections of /BXrepresent matter fields. The gauge group Gis the structure group of the bundle and its generators represent the gauge bosons. The group of loca l gauge transformations G may be regarded as the automorphism group of /C8. Finally, the bundle curvature is to be considered as the interaction field strength. We may, hence, compose a brief dictionary for the bundle terminology of gauge theories as shown in the t able on page 16. (vii) Gauge freedom. It is common practice to call classical electrodynamics, i. e. Maxwell’s theory, already a “gauge theory”. The reason is that the Maxw ell equations are covariant under specific GTL2. But this is certainly a misleading termi nology; we shall rather refer to it as a gauge freedom of the theory, whereas only the Dirac-Maxwell theory, or qua ntum electrodynamics (20), respectively, combines the matter fi eld and the gauge potential and, hence, should be considered a true gauge field theory. (viii) Gauge field theory. The characteristic feature of any gauge field theory is that i t de- scribes the coupling of a pure matter field theory to a pure int eraction “field” (or, rather, 6Unfortunately, the terminology in the literature is not uni form. Some textbook authors already call global and local gauge transformations transformations of the firs t and second kind (compare Ryder (1985, chap. 3.3), for instance). But then they lack to distinguish between matter field and gauge potential transformations. Therefore, we prefer the above terminology originally introduced by Pa uli (1941). 7A more precise term would be “energy-matter fields”, since th ere may exist fundamental particle fields with mass zero such as, perhaps, neutrinos. Most precisely, sinc e there are massive gauge particles, such as W bosons, we should speak about “energy-matter fields which are no gaug e fields”. The reader may read our term “matter field” as a shortform.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 16 Fiber bundle framework Gauge field theory principal bundle /C8 geometric arena of gauge potentials connections on /C8 gauge potentials associated vector bundle /BX geometric arena of matter fields local sections of /BX matter fields structure group G gauge group generators of G gauge bosons automorphisms of /C8 local gauge transformations GTL vertical automorphisms of /C8pure gauge transformations covariant derivative dynamical coupling curvature interaction field strength Table: Comparison of bundle theoretic and gauge theoretic t erminology gauge potential) theory. The structure of the coupling may b e derived from the gauge principle by imposing GTL covariance.8The interaction potential, then, couples to the matter field Noether current which is constructed from the co rresponding GTG covariance. Any gauge theory represents the geometry of a principal fiber bundle (and the associated vector bundle). The gauge group is given by the structure gro up of the bundle. Gauge field theory (for short: gauge theory): A theory which describes the cou- pling of a matter field and an interaction field. It is based on a gauge principle and uniquely determined by its underlying principal bundle structure. 3.2 Quantum gauge field theories At least three of the four known fundamental interactions un doubtedly fit into the gauge the- oretic framework. They are, moreover, suitably formulated as quantum field theories. For our purposes, however, the quantum field theoretic aspect does n ot play any special role. The argument for this is that the structure of the Lagrangian of a certain quantum field theory, quantum electrodynamics (QED) for instance, is the same in t he quantum field theoretic case as in the case of its classical field theoretic counterpart. A lso, the bundle structure, which is our main concern here, remains the same in both cases. Thus, f or our purposes QED is already captured in the Dirac-Maxwell theory.9In the following two subsections we first derive the 8Recently, the physical content of the gauge principle has be en questioned by several authors (Teller, 1997; Redhead, 1998; Brown, 1999). In fact, the idea of imposing lo cal gauge covariance leads, strictly speaking, to just a special kind of bundle space coordinate transformation. A t this point, the occurrence of a gauge connection has no physical significance. Therefore, it can be argued tha t the gauge principle is not sufficient to “derive” the coupling of matter and gauge fields and that a further physica l assumption is needed. As one of us has pointed out, this assumption may perhaps be formulated in terms of a g auge theoretic generalization of the equivalence principle (Lyre, 2000). 9We should mention, however, that in the quantization proces s of gauge theories certain technical problems arise. This is because the considered interaction theory in cludes a gauge freedom (thus, these problems referFiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 17 Dirac-Maxwell theory from the gauge principle in order to de monstrate its practical realization. Next, we shall describe the extension of the gauge approach t o non-abelian gauge theories, the so-called Yang-Mills theories . 3.2.1 Dirac-Maxwell theory As a paradigm we consider the free Dirac field ψ(x) with the Lagrange density LD=¯ψ(x) (iγµ∂µ−m)ψ(x). (9) The free Dirac Lagrangian is covariant under global gauge tr ansformations ψ(x)→ψ′(x) =eiqαψ(x), ¯ψ(x)→¯ψ′(x) =e−iqα¯ψ(x) (10) with some arbitrary constant phase parameter αand charge q. The Noether current correspond- ing to the transformations (10) is given by µ=−q¯ψ(x)γµψ(x). (11) It satisfies the continuity equation, ∂µµ= 0, (12) which expresses the conservation of charge. Following the g auge principle we replace the GTG in (10) by their corresponding GTL1 ψ(x)→ψ′(x) =eiqα(x)ψ(x), ¯ψ(x)→¯ψ′(x) =e−iqα(x)¯ψ(x) (13) with a local, i.e. spacetime dependent phase function α(x). This leads to the coupling to an interaction potential A′ µ(x) =−∂µα(x), (14) which itself satisfies GTL2 Aµ(x)→A′ µ(x) =Aµ(x)−∂µα(x). (15) Applying (13), (14) and (15) to (9) yields to the covariant Di rac Lagrangian L′ D=LD+Lint (16) with the coupling part Lint=−µ(x)Aµ(x). (17) In accordance with the gauge principle, this can directly be seen from the introduction of a covariant derivative ∂µ→Dµ=∂µ−iqAµ(x). (18) Thus, applying (18) to (9) leads, again, to (16). primarily to GTL2 instead of GTL1). But again, since these qu estions are not related to the bundle structure of the theory we shall not be concerned with them.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 18 The gauge theoretic framework necessitates an active interpretation of the local gauge trans- formations GTL. Note that “active” has the manifest meaning of “physically significant”. This should not be confused with the distinction between point an d coordinate transformations, which is also sometimes referred to as a distinction between activ e and passive transformations. The active character of GTL results from their changing the phys ical interaction-free situation (9) into an interaction coupling (16). We will return to this iss ue in section 4. Now, from the bundle theoretic point of view the vector field Aµrepresents the components of the connection one-form of a U(1) principal bundle. From (15) we may as well construct the corresponding curvature tensor Fµν(x) =∂µAν(x)−∂νAµ(x). (19) Interpreting AµandFµνas potential and field strength of the electromagnetic inter action, we are motivated10to complete the Lagrangian (16) to the full QED Lagrangian LQED=LD+Lint+LM (20) with the free Maxwell field part LM=−1 4Fµν(x)Fµν(x). (21) The gauge theoretic feature of a dynamical coupling of two fie ld theories into one combined framework is reflected in the existence of two sorts of equati ons: equations of motion for the matter fields (such as the Dirac equation which stems from LDor, in gauge covariant manner, fromLD+Lint) as well as interaction field equations (such as the Maxwell e quations which stem from LMor, in inhomogeneous form, from LM+Lint). In the combined framework we callAµthegauge potential andFµνthegauge field strength . Quantum gauge field theories are usually formulated on a flat spacetime manifold, i.e. Minkow ski spacetime /CA1,3. Therefore, the principal fiber bundle structure of QED is /C8( /CA1,3,U(1)), indicating that QED is a U(1) gauge theory. 3.2.2 Yang-Mills theories The gauge approach can be extended to non-abelian unitary ga uge groups.11In the standard model case we use SU(2)Lof weak isospin, (unified in the elektroweak model with hyper charge to SU(2)L×U(1)Y), andSU(3)Cas the color group of quantum chromodynamics.12Let us briefly indicate the analogous application of the gauge principle i n the Yang-Mills case. Generally, in order to construct an SU(n) gauge theory, we use the GTL1 Ψ(x)→Ψ′(x) =eignΛa(x)ˆtaΨ(x)≡ˆU(x) Ψ(x) (22) 10Of course, this “interpretation” is not enforced by the gauge principle; compare footnote 8. 11This was first done by C. N. Yang and R. L. Mills for the strong is ospin SU(2)F(Yang and Mills, 1954); cf. Mills (1989), O’Raifeartaigh (1995) for historical remark s. 12Again, in Yang-Mills theories certain peculiarities arise , which will not be of our concern here. Take for instance the Higgs mechanism in the electroweak theory. It a llows for non-zero masses of the gauge bosons by symmetry breaking (since the gauge principle itself only le ads to massless gauge bosons). As yet, however, there is no experimental evidence for Higgs bosons.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 19 of the fundamental spinor representation Ψ = ( ...,ψi,...)T,i= 1,2...nanalogous to (13). The n2−1 operators ˆtagenerate the SU(n) group; each generator corresponds to a gauge potential Ba µ. We obtain the non-abelian generalization of (15), namely B′a µ(x)ˆta=ˆU(x)Ba µ(x)ˆtaˆU+(x)−i gnˆU(x)∂µˆU+(x). (23) In this case the covariant derivative is given by ∂µ→Dµ=∂µ+ignBa µˆta, (24) instead of (18) and the generalization of (19) yields Fa µνˆta=/parenleftBig ∂µBa ν−∂νBa µ−gnfabcBb µBc ν/parenrightBig ˆta=−i gn[Dµ,Dν]. (25) The bundle curvature Fa µνmeasures, so to speak, the non-commutativity of the covaria nt deriva- tives. In contrast to QED, the Yang-Mills Lagrangian LY M=−1 4Fa µν(x)Fa µν(x). (26) contains non-linear self-interaction terms of the kind “ −gn∂BB2” and “g2 nB4”, that is, the gauge bosons carry charge themselves. The principal bundle struc ture is /C8( /CA1,3,SU(2)L×U(1)Y) for the electroweak interaction, and /C8( /CA1,3,SU(3)C) for chromodynamics. We may now ask for the genuine objects of quantum gauge field th eories. To be sure, the application of the gauge principle shows the central rol e of the matter field ψas well as the gauge potentials Ba µ. Without them the gauge argument is impossible, since local gauge transformations GTL1 and GTL2 only take effect on them. Moreo ver, in order to derive the equations of motion and field equations, the corresponding L agrangians have to be varied with respect toψandBa µ. Recall, however, that ψandBa µare no gauge invariant quantities and are, therefore, not directly observable! By way of contrast , the gauge field strength Fa µνis gauge invariant – as well as quantities bilinear in ψsuch as the Noether current. If we insist on the central role played by ψandBa µ, then this leads to the curious fact that, in gauge theories, the genuine objects arising are themselves not di rectly observable. Thus, it seems that we ourselves are faced with a dilemma – similar to Field’s one : the one horn being that if we consider matter fields and gauge potentials as genuine objec ts of gauge field theories (because they are indispensible in deriving the theory from the Lagra ngian or from the gauge principle) we did not choose directly observable quantities, but rathe r mathematical entities with no direct physical significance.13However, if we restrict ourselves to directly observable qu antities only, we must give up the whole idea of gauge theories, since per defi nition we can only apply the gauge principle to non-gauge invariant quantities. This is the other horn of the dilemma. 13One crucial remark, however: in Yang-Mills theories the gau ge potentials make a direct contribution to the field strength tensor as can be seen from (25). Moreover, in th e Yang-Mills field equations (DµFµν)a(x) =∂µFaµν(x)−gnfabcBb µFcµν(x) =aν(x). theBa µoccur in direct combination with Fa µν. Therefore, in this case their physical significance is clea rly higher than for the Aµpotential in the abelian case.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 20 We shall have to say more about this issue in the last section o f this paper. For the time being, we accept the first horn, that is, we accept the occuren ce of objects in gauge theories (seemingly even the primary ones!) which, on the one hand sid e, are not directly observable, on which, however, on the other hand side, the whole idea of gaug ing is obviously based and which are, insofar, truly indispensible. 3.3 Gravitational gauge field theories The fundamental quantum field theories of the electroweak an d strong interactions clearly fit into the gauge theoretic framework and possess a natural fibe r bundle structure. No such clarity can be found in the case of gravitational theories.14Nevertheless, we will argue that even grav- itational theories are best described in terms of gauge theo ries. As a consequence, we will show that the underlying bundle structure allows to distinguish naturally the physically significant objects and constituents of these theories from the merely m athematical ones. Our position is by no means universal. In fact, orthodox relativists are l ikely to claim that a fiber bundle formulation of general relativity (GR) is superfluous.15This difference of opinion cannot be easily resolved. However, we will try to demonstrate that a b undle formulation of GR facilitates a better understanding of some outstanding philosophical i ssues in gravitational theories. 3.3.1 The gravitational gauge principle Let us, first, apply the gauge principle in the gravitational case. For the sake of simplicity we restrict ourselves to GR, which we shall present as a gauge theory of the homogeneous Lorentz group SO(1,3). The generality of our conception will not be affected beca use alternative gravitational gauge theories may be founded on a gauge princ iple, too.16We start with flat Minkowski space /CA1,3, that is the interaction-free case in which no gravitation e xists. Hence, 14By “gravitational theory” we henceforth mean any theory whi ch is based on the equivalence principle. Besides general relativity the class of gravitational theories inc ludes unorthodox approaches of almost all imaginable gauge groups of a four dimensional pseudo-Euclidean spacetime su ch as affine, linear and orthogonal groups, as well as their corresponding covering and supersymmetric groups an d the diffeomorphism group – cf. Ne’eman (1980), Hehl et al. (1995). The first gauge theory of gravitation was prese nted by R. Utiyama (1956), using the homogeneous Lorentz group SO(1,3) as a structure group. Later on, F. W. Hehl and others consid ered the full Poincar´ e group ISO(1,3) in a Riemann-Cartan spacetime with curvature and torsion (Hehl et al., 1976; Hehl et al., 1980). In most of the cases the experimental testability of alternati ve theories of gravitation is beyond our current measuring accuracy and, thus, the theoretical discussion is open for s peculation. 15Compare, for instance, J. Ehlers: “ ... The formulation of the “field kinematics” of GR in terms of pri ncipal bundles and their associated bundles allows one to consider GR as a gauge theory ... As far as I can see such gauge considerations have not led to a deeper understanding of GR as such ... I at least fail to see that the use of affine bundles with affine (in Cartan’s sense) connections chan ges this fact, nor does it help me to appreciate it more deeply. ... Of course these remarks are not intended to p ass any judgement on theories other than Einstein’s, with or without gauge. ” (Ehlers, 1973). 16For different types of gravitational gauge theories one basi cally has to plug in different gauge groups. In fact, a more rigorous approach, strictly following the gauge prin ciple, leads to a gauge theory of translations, since the gravitational field couples to energy-matter, that is th e corresponding Noether current associated with global Poincar´ e translation covariance.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 21 we consider the free geodesic equation, dθµ(τ) dτ= 0, (27) for a four vector θµ(τ) =dxµ(τ) dτ, tangent to a timelike curve xµ(τ).θµ≡θµ 0together with a system of three spacelike vectors θµ irepresents a tetrad θµ α= (θµ 0,θµ 1,θµ 2,θµ 3). Since we wish to derive gravity as a gauge theory of SO(1,3), the GTL1 analogous to (13) have the form θµ α(τ) =ˆLβ α(x)θµ β(τ) =e(ˆMa)β αΛa(x)θµ β(τ) (28) witha= 1...6 generators ˆMaofSO(1,3) and spacetime-dependent transformation parameters Λa(x) (we setx≡xµ(τ)). In analogy to the Yang-Mills case (22), the Latin index a“lives” in the Lie algebra of the gauge group. Note further that we must dist inguish external space-time indices µ,ν... from internal tetrad indices α,β... . The former “live” in curved base space (holonomic indices), whereas the latter “live” in local flat Minkowski s pace (anholonomic indices), i.e. in the fibers of the tangent bundle of the SO(1,3) principal bundle over spacetime. What is unique in the case of gravitation is the existence of a natural mapping of the base space into the fiber space (this mapping indices an isomporphism between the associat ed vector bundle and the tangent bundle of the spacetime base manifold). The mapping allows u s to distinguish between internal and external indices. This phenomenon is sometimes referre d to as the soldering of base space and fibers. Next, the gauge postulate, when applied to local Lorentz rot ations of the tetrads, leads to a covariant derivative ∇τ, d dτθµ α(τ)→ ∇ τθµ α(τ) =d dτθµ α(τ) + Γβ ναdxν(τ) dτθµ β(τ). (29) Γµdenotes the so-called Levi-Civita connection with Christoffel symbols as components. As in (15), Γ µsatisfies the GTL2 Γγ να(x) =ˆLγ α(x) Γδ νγ(x) (ˆL−1)γ δ(x)−ˆLδ α(x)∂ν(ˆL−1)γ δ(x). (30) Finally, (27) becomes the geodesic equation in curved space time d dτθµ α(τ) + Γβ ναdxν(τ) dτθµ β(τ) = 0. (31) Now we may compare GR with the quantum gauge theories discuss ed above. Obviously, in the gravitational case, the gauge potentials are given by th e Levi-Civita connection Γ µ. From this we may form the curvature tensor Rµ αβν, the so-called Riemann tensor , which represents the gravitational field strength.17A principal bundle with orthogonal structure group, such as SO(1,3), acting on tetradial frames, is called an orthonormal frame bundle (or tetrad bundle, respectively). Note that tetrads are represented by tangen t vector fields, i.e. sections in the associated tangent vector bundle. Thus, in gravitational g auge theories, tetrads or reference frames play a role analogous to the matter fields in quantum ga uge theories. 17Per definition, the Christoffel symbols are symmetric in the l ower indices Γµ αβ= Γµ βα. Once we give up this restriction we may also have torsion (besides curvature) as a gravitational field strength in alternative gravitationa l gauge theories.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 22 Observe that, from the gauge theoretic point of view, the met ric tensorgµνis a derived object which is built from the tetrads by means of gµν=ηαβθα µθβ ν, with Minkowski metric ηαβ=diag(−1,1,1,1). Observe further that the Levi-Civita connection is not a n independent object of the theory either (we shall represent it in terms of derivatives of the tetrads). To say that the connection is given in terms of the metric (which is g iven in terms of the tetrads) is another way of expressing the soldering of the bundle space ( where the connection lives) and the base space (where the metric lives). We may associate with any reference frame an observer in spac etime and, hence, a real physical system of ponderable matter constituting measuri ng rods and clocks. Note that ob- servers in spacetime theories are, usually, represented by mass points on timelike curves; cf. Earman (1974). However, the gauge principle suggests that w e represent observers by tetradial frames, because the gravitational GTL1 act on tetrad indice s. Moreover, this construction is more general since it allows for a representation of fermion ic matter.18 By definition, the gauge principle allows us to derive the gra vitational equation of motion (31). In GR, the field equations are given by the Einstein field equations which result from a Lagrangian LGR=1 2κ√−gR+LMatter linear in the field strength. To be sure, a more general gravitational gauge approach shall use a quadratic field Lag rangian; cf. Hehl et al. (1980). The variation with respect to tetrads and connections as genuin e fields leads to the Cartan equations, the true Yang-Mills equations of gravitation. Einstein’s G R, therefore, only mimics the gauge theoretic framework without really fitting in it. 3.3.2 Objects and principles in general relativity The key idea of the paper is to point out that the fiber bundle fo rmalism in gauge theories is fruitful and that it clarifies the status of various theoreti c objects. We claim that even when gravitational gauge theories are concerned, the bundle lan guage provides a natural distinction between the physically significant structures and the merel y mathematical ones. Let us start with an important technical remark: as we mentio ned earlier, the structure group of the fiber bundle is considered to be the gauge group G. This terminology, though, can be seri- ously misleading if we confuse the gauge group with the group Gof local gauge transformations. The latter one consists of spacetime-dependent group eleme nts and is, thus, infinite-dimensional. In general, Gis a subgroup of the automorphism group Aut( /C8) of the gauge theory’s princi- pal bundle /C8. The subgroup GoofGof just the vertical automorphisms is called the group of “pure gauge transformations”. Locally, Glooks like a semidirect product of the covariance group of the base manifold and the structure group. Thus, we fi ndG∼=ISO(1,3)× ⊂SU(n) for Yang-Mills theories in Minkowski space. In GR, however, Gois already a subgroup of Diff(M), the covariance group of the manifold, i.e. we have G∼=Diff(M)× ⊂ISO(1,3)∼=Diff(M). Andrzej Trautman states this point as follows: “... in the theory of gravitation, the group Goof ‘pure gauge’ transformations reduces to the identity; all elemen ts ofGcorrespond to diffeomorphisms ofM.”(Trautman, 1980a; Trautman, 1980b, p. 306). 18The close connection between Dirac spinors and tetrads was a lready used in Weyl’s 1929 paper. From the modern aspect of encountering a quantum gauge theory of g ravitation, tetradial reference frames are also important; cf. Rovelli (1991), Lyre (1998).Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 23 This is the reason why it is difficult to distinguish between me rely mathematical and truly physical transformations and objects in GR. From our bundle point of view, however, we are able to carry out this distinction quite naturally. We are fa ced with three different groups: first, the covariance group of the spacetime manifold ( Diff(M), in general). Since it reflects a mere symmetry of the base space, we may safely consider it as p urely mathematical. Second, the structure group G. It constitutes the fibers and has significance insofar as it r eflects the geometric arena of the connections. In 3.3.1 we chose G=SO(1,3), but as we already mentioned, a more rigorous gravitational gauge approach uses the Poincar´ e t ranslation group. It can be shown that this group is isomorphic to the group of local diffeomorphism s (the reader may simply recall that a local diffeomorphism is nothing but an infinitesimal point s hift, i.e. a local translation). Thus, in this case, we even get G=Diff(M). Third, there is the group of local gauge transformations G. As we already emphasized, the GTL have physical significanc e because of their role in the gauge theoretic framework: they reflect the existence of an i nteraction field coupled to the matter field and they have, thus, an active interpretation. The curi osity of gravitational theories is that both the covariance group as well as Gare isomorphic to Diff(M) (and even G=Diff(M) for translational gauge theories). The orthodox “pure base man ifold” approach of GR, however, does not allow to distinguish between GandG.19This distinction is one of the most important conceptual advantages of the fiber bundle formalism in GR. Similar ideas regarding gravitation have also been expressed by John Stachel (1986). The problem of the meaning of covariance within orthodox GR i s not a minor one. The reader may recall that there is a longstanding question of wh ether Einstein’s so-called principle of covariance has any physical content20and, hence, whether a meaningful distinction can be made between absolute and dynamical objects of GR. One fruitful w ay of dealing with these questions has been James Anderson’s proposal (Anderson, 1967). Intui tively, an absolute object is one which remains invariant or unchanged by the interactions of the theory under consideration. However, it may itself change or influence other objects. Exa mples are given by the Galilei metric in Newtonian spacetime (NS) and the Minkowski metric ηµνin special relativity (SR). The pseudo-Riemannian metric gµνin GR, on the other hand, represents a dynamical object. To be sure, from our point of view the distinction between abs olute and dynamical objects is already captured in the difference between base space and fibe rs: dynamical objects “live” in the fibers, whereas the absolute objects belong to the base ma nifold. Now, Anderson as well as Michael Friedman proposed to use the distinction between absolute and dynamical geometric objects to characterize spacetime theories (Anderson, 1967; Friedman, 1983); see also Trautman (1973). According to Anderson-Fri edman any spacetime theory is associated with a certain symmetry group, which is “... defined to be the largest subgroup of the covariance group of this theory, which is simultaneousl y the symmetry group of its absolute objects. In particular, if the theory has no absolute object , then the symmetry group of the physical system under consideration is just the covariance group of this theory.” (Anderson, 19Concerning the group of pure gauge transformations Go, however, we must restrict our statement of the physical significance of G: pure gauge transformations, surely, do not have a physical effect – see our remarks in section 4. 20The prelude was given by Kretschmann’s early objections 191 7 – see Norton (1993) for a general historical account.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 24 1967, p. 87). This is the case in GR. Any of the above mentioned examples of spacetime theories can be characterized by a symmetry group which pres erves the absolute objects of the theory. And conversely, any symmetry group accounts for a re lativity principle, which in the case of NS is the Galilei principle and in the case of SR the spe cial relativity principle. For GR the Anderson-Friedman approach has the advantage of showin g that the principle of general covariance has two different possible meanings: Firstly, co nsidered as a statement about the coordinate covariance of spacetime theories, it is indeed p hysically vacuous, since any spacetime theory which represents spacetime as a differentiable manif old – such as NS, SR, and GR – may be written in a covariant manner, i.e. form invariant under Diff(M). Secondly, Diff(M) arises not only as a covariance, but simultaneously as a symmetry gr oup of GR. This, however, is a highly non-trivial feature of GR; it only obtains because GR does not contain absolute objects. Therefore, this symmetry feature may be understood as the principle of general relativity . This principle has a clear physical significance, unlike the prin ciple of general covariance, which refers to a merely mathematical (and not even characteristic) feat ure of GR. It is the advantage of the Anderson-Friedman approach that it points out the crucial c onceptual difference between these two principles.21 From our bundle point of view, then, the confusion about the s tatus of the “principle of covariance” never arises. As a mere base space property, gen eral covariance has no physical significance whatsoever.22On the other hand, to allow for a local gauge covariance in GR, that is, to allow any observer to perform a transformation of loca l reference frames with elements of G, is only possible by introducing a gravitational field to com pensate for this local requirement. This is the true physical content of the principle of GR which is, thus, best understood as a gravitational gauge principle.23 To sum up: Gravitation can be understood as a gauge field theor y proper. Its genuine 21Note, that the Anderson-Friedman approach is designed to cl assify spacetime theories in hierarchical order according to their absolute objects (or their symmetry grou ps, respectively). However, “... as Robert Geroch has observed, since any two timelike, nowhere-vanishing ve ctor fields defined on a relativistic space-time are d- equivalent, it follows that any such vector field counts as an absolute object...” (Friedman, 1983, footnote p. 59). Clearly, this raises a problem for the issue of classifying t heories. From our point of view, instead of using the distinction between absolute and dynamical, we prefer to us e the dichotomy between the merely mathematical parts belonging to the base space and the truly physical part s belonging to the fibers. Indeed, one might even call these parts absolute and dynamical. However, our disti nction is not primarily intended to classify spacetime theories, but rather to indicate their physical content. Wi th regard to timelike curves we clearly see that they do, indeed, belong to the physical part of GR, since they are asso ciated with tangent vector fields, i.e. sections in the associated vector bundle. In fact, reference frames, which may be associated with timelike vectors, turn out to be the genuine objects of gravitational gauge theories (see ou r remarks in section 3.3.1). Thus, the bundle language shows that the only “absolute” entity left in gravitational theories is the spacetime manifold itself – and its sole non-trivial property is that it admits a differentiable stru cture (including global topology and the signature of its metric). 22Observe, though, that general covariance is sometimes unde rstood to encode the universality of the gravita- tional coupling. In the framework of bundle geometries this is more adaequately expressed in the soldering of bundle and base space: the gravitational interaction (bund le connection) represents the geometry of the spacetime base manifold itself, and, hence, every physical object inspacetime is affected. Because of this feature, gravitation is distinguished from other forces. 23However, as we already pointed out in footnote 8, the complet e coupling structure of gauge theories is based on the further assumption of an equivalence principle. This isa fortiori true in gravitational gauge theories.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 25 objects are tetradial reference frames, the bundle structu re is given by the principal bundle of orthonormal frames. Bundles in gravitational theories, al though they seem to be superfluous due to the soldering of base space and fibers, allow us to overcome conceptual problems concerning the meaning of the various principles of relativity and cova riance. At the same time they help us to distinguish the truly physical parts of these kind of th eories. In our opinion this proves that even in the case of gravitation the fiber bundle formulat ion has clear advantages.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 26 4 The resolution of “Field’s dilemma” In this last section we would like to conclude with a focused a ttempt to answer various questions which arise in connection with Field’s dilemma. 4.1 Five questions Question 1: How does the fiber bundle approach affect a distinction betwee n the genuinely physical and the merely mathematical parts of physics? As we emphasized throughout the paper we believe that when ga uge theories are formulated in terms of fiber bundles the merely mathematical part should “live” in the base space while the truly physical part is contained in the fibers. The base sp ace is, essentially, a system of coordinates. The need for such a “coordinatization” is a dee p one – it is required whenever we wish to define a physical interaction. Such a setting is man dated by the very concept of measurement or observation: we can only observe and measure an interaction if we can identify the location where it takes place. The coordinate system, th ough, as useful as it is and as unavoidable for the application of the theory, should not be considered, in and of itself, a physical phenomenon or a collection of physical objects. Another way of formulating the distinction between the math ematical and the physical is the following. Given a mathematical space which represents a gauge theory in its entirety one should identify, first, the class of physical interactions w hich appear in the theory. The second step is to find out what the formal properties of each interact ion are, that is, those properties which remain the same irrespective of location. These forma l features can usually be described as the operation of a group which is called the structure grou p. Finally, once the group is defined, we construct the equivalence relation to which the g roup gives rise and describe the total space as a principal bundle: the space is “quotientize d” with respect to the structure group. The base space is then presented as a way of “indexing” the various fibers in a smooth way, as Sunny Auyang has pointed out (Auyang, 1995). This ind exing system does not need to have a physical interpretation and it is perfectly consis tent with a relational approach to the spacetime base manifold. As we remarked earlier, the two poi nts of view, “coordinatization” and “quotientization”, are mathematically equivalent wit h respect to the construction of fiber bundles. As we have seen the vertical connections are what allows us to compare the interaction in different regions. In and of themselves they do not have any ph ysical significance; they do, however, allow us to see how does the interaction, which is sc hematically represented by the operation of the structure group on the fibers, propagate fro m one region to the next. Question 2: In what sense is the merely mathematical part, which we ident ified with the base manifold structures, dispensable? When we say that the base manifold is dispensable we do not mea n that we can do physics without a base manifold. We have had the occasion to see that w henever we wish to discuss a local interaction we must use some coordinate system. Even mathematically, the very idea of generalizing the direct product necessitates some way of covering the space with coordinateFiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 27 patches. There are, however, many different ways to coordina tize a space. These different methods must be, in some sense, equivalent (in mathematical terms the building blocks of one method must be obtainable by a diffeomorphism from those o f the other). This, however, does not mean that the methods are identical and, hence, we sh ould not get rid of this “layer of hidden structure” too easily. First, there might be a way o f distinguishing between two diffeomorphic systems. Second, as we have seen, there are cas es where the diffeomorphisms are “active transformations”, that is, they have a significant p hysical interpretation (this is the case, for example, when gravity is construed as a gauge theory of lo cal diffeomorphisms which are mathematically isomorphic to local translations – see sect ion 3.3). Only in those cases where the diffeomorphisms do not have such an interpretation (for exam ple, when they represent coordinate transformations) are we free to say that the difference betwe en diffeomorphic coordinate systems can be ignored. It is precisely in this sense that a particula r coordinate system is dispensable. Any other diffeomorphic coordinate system would have served just as well giving rise to a theory that is equivalent from a physical point of view. Question 3: Are the fiber bundle formulations of physical theories “reas onably attractive”? The question is whether our approach is aggressively revisi onistic and philosophically motivated or not. It is a rather important question with wide implicati ons. To put it bluntly the question is whether physics itself admits a natural distinction betw een the mathematical and the physical or whether it takes a philosopher with a “hidden agenda” to ac cept the formulations we offer because they permit such a distinction. The first answer we would like to offer is that the theories in th e standard model (including gravitation) admit a canonical fiber bundle formulation. Mo reover, the gauge approach seems to provide the only “link” between quantum field interaction s and gravitation.24This aspect of unification is certainly one of the strongest arguments fo r the use of fiber bundles in con- temporary physics. This point, though, does not settle the i ssue. There is a more fundamental reservation, that is felt by many physicists, that the hypha luted mathematics of fiber bundles is superficial, that layers of unnecessary mathematical struc ture are postulated, that fiber bundle formulations are, simply, superfluous. As we have seen before, one voice of dissent comes from the ort hodox general relativity theorists. This is not surprising. As the reader undoubtedl y knows the founding fathers of modern gravitational theories, headed by Einstein and Weyl , attempted to “geometrize” physics. This ambition precludes any rough and ready distinction bet ween the geometric (and hence, the merely mathematical) and the physical. Indeed, as we remark ed earlier even from a fiber bundle theoretic point of view gravitation is a special case. In the case of theories of gravitation the fibers are “soldered” to the base manifold. This means that th e extra degree of freedom which, in most cases, allows for the introduction of the operation o f a structure group on the fibers does not exist in the case of gravitation. Why, then, should w e bother with the fiber bundle formulation? Why not formulate gravitation in terms of mani folds with curvature (and torsion) alone? An even more fundamental worry is that the fiber bundle s which arise in gauge physics are, in most cases, mathematically trivial, that is, they ad mit global sections and, therefore, they 24We do not consider approaches beyond the standard model such as supersymmetry, strings, etc.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 28 are isomorphic to direct products.25Does all this not mean that the fiber bundle formulation is superfluous? We would like to offer a more general response to the claim that the physics of fiber bundles is trivial. As we have mentioned earlier there are three type s of fiber bundles: (i) Trivial bundles with flat connections. In this case the connections are constant. Galileian spacetime, for example, can be viewed as a fiber bun dle of that type. It has absolute time /CA– the bundle’s base space – and relative space /CA3– the fibers with struc- ture group O(3). The bundle is globally isomorphic to the direct product /CA× /CA3and therefore trivial. The flatness of the connections indicate s space as a non-dynamical, i.e. purely mathematical object. Regarding type (i) we can safel y say that the fiber bundle formulation is completely superfluous. (ii) Trivial bundles with non-flat connections. In such cases the connections become dy- namical quantities, but the bundle space is still isomorphi c to a direct product. Both quantum gauge theories and gravitation give rise to fiber bun dles with non-flat connec- tions. We would like to suggest that the existence of non-flat connections signifies the physical non-triviality (as opposed to their triviality in the mathematical sense) o f the fiber bundles involved. Consequently, we believe that in tho se cases involving bundles with non-flat connections the fiber bundle formulations are t o be taken seriously. This claim is, clearly, a contentious one; for the time being we ha ve no conclusive proof that it is defensible. Can we make do with an argument showing that in all the known cases the existence of non-flat connections has physical significance ? Certainly we cannot pretend to have exhausted the issue in these pages. (iii) Non-trivial bundles. Here, the bundle space is no longer isomorphic to a direct pro duct. In footnote 25 we used the opportunity to briefly discuss thes e cases already. There is no doubt that, in cases which fall under this category, the bund le formulation is important, fruitful and, perhaps, indispensible. But, as we mentioned in the above footnote, there may be some doubt about the fundamental role these cases play in physics. 25Let us mention, ever so briefly, that physical cases exist who se formulation in fiber bundle theoretic terms is not trivial. Some of them are known in the literature under the terms geometrical or topological phases. The best known case of this kind is the Aharonov-Bohm effect: T he quantum phase of a particle’s wavefunction parallel transported along a closed loop around a trapped ma gnetic field (such as a torroidal magnet, for instance) shows a phase anholonomy which is experimentally tested via interference patterns (Aharonov and Bohm, 1959). Anholonomy means that closed loops on the base manifold are l ifted to open curves in the bundle. The presence of an anholonomy prevents one from defining global cross sect ions. Therefore, a fiber bundle arising in connection with the Aharonov-Bohm effect is non-trivial (a more general account of physical anholonomies is given by the theory of Berry phases; cf. Shapere and Wilczek, 1989). Non- trivial bundles in quantum gauge theories may even also indicate topological effects such as monopoles and inst antons. Most of them, however, are not vindicated experimentally (at least from a foundational point of view) . This is the reason why we do not want to draw decisive arguments from them. Moreover, as we mentioned alr eady, we do not consider approaches beyond the standard model to settle our point; see, for example, T. Y. Ca o on grand unified and supergravity theories (Cao, 1997, chap. 11.3). Sure enough, the fundamental existence o f such topological effects would make our arguments concerning the significance of fiber bundles even stronger, i f not non-refutable!Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 29 Question 4: Do all the mathematical objects which are defined on the fiber s pace stand for measurable interactions or observable physical objects? Our aim in this paper was to show that we can assume that physic al phenomena have measurable consequences while, at the same time, affecting a distinctio n between the merely mathematical and the truly physical. Our argument was an inductive one. We showed that our point of view is consistent with current physics. Recall that the signific ant structures, from a physical point of view, are matter fields, gauge potentials, gauge field streng ths, and local gauge transformations. Therefore, what we need to show is that all these cases involv e only objects which live in the fibers. We shall discuss them one after another. Matter fields. They are constructed as local sections in the vector bundles which are associ- ated with principal bundles and happen to be the basic physic al constituents of the gauge principle. In the standard model the matter fields are given b y the fundamental elemen- tary particle fields; in gravitational gauge theories they a re tangent vector fields of the base manifold which are associated with reference frames. T he matter fields are not gauge invariant themselves; only bilinear quantities as the Noet her current are directly observ- able. Nevertheless, there are two reasons why we cannot do ph ysics without them: first, we may observe interference effects which cannot be explaine d from the quantities bilinear in the matter field wave-functions. Second, they are indispe nsible for explaining the gauge principle, since local gauge transformations GTL1 act on th em. Therefore, matter fields and the vector spaces in which they live (the fibers of the asso ciated vector bundles) have a certain physical significance. From their conceptual role i n the gauge theoretic framework we must even consider them the building blocks of gauge theor ies. Gauge potentials. They are represented as coefficients of the connection forms w hich split the tangent space of a principal bundle into a horizontal and a ve rtical part. For physicists this concept is rather known as “covariant derivative”. The y give rise to the gauge bosons. Potentials are, again, not directly measurable, but in the c ase of non-trivial bundles they will have observational consequences in terms of topologic al effects. They are, also, in- dispensible for an understanding of the gauge principle, si nce local gauge transformations GTL2 act on them. Gauge field strengths. They are represented by the bundle curvature. As gauge invar iant quantities they are directly measurable as forces. With res pect to our three-fold dis- tinction of bundle types above, they give rise to type (ii) bu ndles which we considered as sufficient for explanatory purposes (since non-flat connecti ons are defined by non-vanishing curvature). Local gauge transformations. These transformations give rise to the structure group Gand, hence, to the group of local gauge transformations G(recall our remarks in section 3.3.2). The postulate of local gauge covariance, as it is used in the g auge principle, determines the form of the interaction coupling of the Lagrangian (the G TL1 lead to the existence of an interaction gauge potential with transformations GTL 2; in other words, the GTLFiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 30 determine the dynamics).26In our opinion this constitutes a strong argument in favour o f an active interpretation of local gauge transformations. On the other hand, the subgroup GoofGof the so-called pure gauge transformations has no physical significance, since these transformations mere ly transform ‘vertically’ within an equivalence class of fiber points. In other words, pure gau ge transformations preserve the connections. It is, of course, unavoidable to have an ele ment of redundancy within the bundle framework, since the whole idea of the generalizatio n of the direct product is rested on the existence of a hidden layer of structure, namely the ga uge group equivalence classes, as we pointed out in section 2.1. When we speak about active lo cal gauge transformations, we mean that they have a vertical as well as a horizontal compo nent (as encoded on the covariant derivative). Note also, that our usage of “act ive” here essentially means “physically effective”, i.e. changing the physical situati on. This, indeed, is the case when local gauge transformations are concerned. Because of the g auge principle, the postulate of local gauge covariance can be satisfied only by introducin g an interaction gauge field. And this changes the physical situation. In this respect we want to emphasize that the common view of in terpreting point transforma- tions as active transformations raises a different issue. Th ose, who regard point transformations as active, in the above-mentioned physical sense, are likel y to regard points and spaces as en- tities. This touches on the issue of relationalism/substan tivalism which we will address in our last question. Question 5: Are we committed to substantivalism with respect to bundle s paces? Substantivalism with respect to fiber bundle spaces is the do ctrine that bundle spaces, their constituents, bundle space points, and, hence, also the bas e space itself, are genuine individu- able entities. This position raises many interesting philo sophical questions. One has to admit that, at a first glance, the fiber bundle formalism can be utili zed to justify this most extreme substantivalist position. Our point, though, was a differen t one. We wanted to affect a distinc- tion between the truly physical parts of fiber bundle gauge ph ysics and those which are not; and we identified the physical parts with the various fields and tr ansformations arising in the fibers (as listed under the previous question). This point, howeve r, does not commit us to substan- tivalism. In fact, the distinction we make between the mathe matical and the physical parts of gauge field theories does not commit us to any view about the on tological status of mathematical entities (one may think of the spacetime metric in GR as a phys ical object without taking it to be a substance). To be sure, questions concerning the stat us of fiber spaces are of a novel kind and certainly very interesting.27Observe, though, that this issue is not logically related to our approach. We are not committed to the view that fiber spa ces are themselves physically 26Again, as we remarked several times, the true “determinatio n” of the gauge potential as being physical neces- sitates a further assumption, which may be formulated in ter ms of a generalized equivalence principle (compare footnote 8). 27It is possible to develop a bundle space hole argument to rule out bundle space substantivalism (Lyre, 1999) in analogy to the well-known spacetime hole argument (Earma n and Norton, 1987); compare Earman (1989, chap. 8-9) also for comments on the hole argument and Field’s substantivalism.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 31 significant; we rather maintain that the functions living th erein, and not the spaces, are genuine physical objects. 4.2 Conclusion We hope to have demonstrated that our approach is one way of re solving Field’s dilemma. Our method was an inductive one. By looking carefully at a whole c ollection of gauge theories we noticed that they all admit a natural distinction between th e physical and the mathematical parts. This does not strike us as an accidental fact, althoug h, we have no way of proving it conclusively. Therefore, on the basis of our observation s, we conclude that we obtained a general result: the physically significant objects and quan tities can be represented as functions which are defined on the fibers (which does not mean that, conve rsely, all of the structures in the fibers are physically significant). Our question of distingu ishing between the mathematical and the physical parts was originally motivated philosophical ly. But it seems plausible to assume that the evolving degree of unification in physics should ent ail a natural distinction between these both parts in terms of the architecture of our fundamen tal theories itself. Fiber bundle gauge theories, we believe, are a crucial step in this direct ion.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 32 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the people at the Center for Philosophy of Science of the University of Pittsburgh for their kind hospitality and support during ou r common stay as Visiting Fellows during the 1999 spring term. Special thanks to John Earman an d John Norton (Pittsburgh) as well as Tim Oliver Eynck (Amsterdam) for their questions and corrections. One of us (H.L.) was partially supported by the Alexander von Humboldt-Foun dation (Bonn). References Aharonov, Y. and Bohm, D. (1959). Significance of electromag netic potentials in the quantum theory. Physical Review , 115(3):485–491. Anderson, J. L. (1967). Principles of Relativity Physics . Academic Press, New York. Auyang, S. Y. (1995). How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford University Press, New York. Brown, H. R. (1999). Aspects of objectivity in quantum mecha nics. In Butterfield, J. and Pagonis, C., editors, From Physics to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Cao, T. Y. (1997). Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories . Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge. Drechsler, W. and Mayer, M. E. (1977). Fiber Bundle Techniques in Gauge Theories . Lecture Notes in Physics 67. Springer, Berlin. Earman, J. (1974). Covariance, invariance, and the equival ence of frames. Foundations of Physics , 4:267–289. Earman, J. (1989). World Enough and Space-Time . MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Earman, J. and Norton, J. (1987). What price spacetime subst antivalism? The hole story. The British Journal for the Philosophy Science , 83:515–525. Ehlers, J. (1973). The nature and structure of spacetime. In Mehra (1973). Field, H. (1980). Science without Numbers . Princeton University Press, Princeton. Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of Space-Time Theories . Princeton University Press, Prince- ton. Hehl, F. W., Heyde, P. v. d., Kerlick, G. D., and Nester, J. M. ( 1976). General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects. Reviews of Modern Physics , 48:393–416. Hehl, F. W., McCrea, J. D., Mielke, E. W., and Ne’eman, Y. (199 5). Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spi nors, and breaking of dilation invariance. Physics Reports , 258:1–171.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 33 Hehl, F. W., Nitsch, J., and Heyde, P. v. d. (1980). Gravitati on and the Poincar´ e gauge field theory with quadratic Lagrangian. In Held (1980). Held, A., editor (1980). General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years afte r the Birth of Albert Einstein . Plenum Press, New York. 2 Volumes. Kretschmann, E. (1917). ¨Uber den physikalischen Sinn der Relativit¨ atspostulate, A. Einsteins neue und seine urspr¨ ungliche Relativit¨ atstheorie. Annalen der Physik , 53:575–614. Lyre, H. (1998). Quantum space-time and tetrads. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 37(1):393–400. (E-print arXiv:quant-ph/9703028). Lyre, H. (1999). Gauges, holes, and their ‘connections’. To appear in: D. Howard (ed.), Pro- ceedings of the “Fifth International Conference on the Hist ory and Foundations of General Relativity” , Notre Dame, Indiana. (E-print arXiv:gr-qc/9904036). Lyre, H. (2000). A generalized equivalence principle. Subm itted to the International Journal of Modern Physics D (E-print arXiv:gr-qc/0004054). Mehra, J., editor (1973). The Physicist’s Conception of Nature . Reidel, Dordrecht. Mills, R. (1989). Gauge fields. American Journal of Physics , 57(6):493–507. Ne’eman, Y. (1980). Gravity, groups, and gauges. In Held (19 80). Norton, J. D. (1993). General covariance and the foundation s of general relativity: Eight decades of dispute. Reports of Progress in Physics , 56:791–858. O’Raifeartaigh, L. (1995). The Dawning of Gauge Theory . Princeton University Press, Prince- ton. Pauli, W. (1941). Relativistic field theories of elementary particles. Reviews of Modern Physics , 13:203–232. Redhead, M. (1998). Review: S. Y. Auyang, How is quantum field theory possible? (New York, Oxford University Press, 1995). The British Journal for the Philosophy Science , 49:499–507. Rovelli, C. (1991). Quantum reference frames. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 8:317–331. Ryder, L. H. (1985). Quantum Field Theory . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (Second edition 1996). Shapere, A. and Wilczek, F., editors (1989). Geometric Phases in Physics . World Scientific, Singapore. Stachel, J. (1986). What a physicist can learn from the disco very of general relativity. In Ruffini, R., editor, Proceedings of the Fourth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Gener al Relativity . Elsevier. Teller, P. (1997). A metaphysics for contemporary field theo ries – Essay review: S. Y. Auyang, How is quantum field theory possible? (New York, Oxford Unive rsity Press, 1995). Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics , 28:507–522.Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and “Field’s Dilemma” 34 Trautman, A. (1973). Theory of gravitation. In Mehra (1973) . Trautman, A. (1980a). Fiber bundles, gauge fields, and gravi tation. In Held (1980). Trautman, A. (1980b). On groups of gauge transformations. I n Harnad, J. H. and Shnider, S., editors, Geometrical and Topological Methods in Gauge Theories . Springer, Berlin. Trautman, A. (1984). Differential Geometry for Physicists . Bibliopolis, Napoli. Utiyama, R. (1956). Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction. Physical Review , 101(5):1597–1607. Weyl, H. (1929). Elektron und Gravitation. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik , pages 330–352. Yang, C. N. and Mills, R. L. (1954). Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance. Physical Review , 96(1):191–195.

arXiv:physics/0005053v1 [physics.atm-clus] 22 May 2000An orbital-free molecular dynamics study of melting in K 20, K55, K92, K142, Rb 55and Cs55clusters. Andr´ es Aguado Departamento de F´ ısica Te´ orica, Universidad de Valladol id, Valladolid 47011, Spain The melting-like transition in potasium clusters K N, with N=20, 55, 92 and 142, is studied by using an orbital-free density-functional constant-energ y molecular dynamics simulation method, and compared to previous theoretical results on the melting -like transition in sodium clusters of the same sizes. Melting in potasium and sodium clusters proceed s in a similar way: a surface melting stage develops upon heating before the homogeneous melting temperature is reached. Premelting effects are nevertheless more important and more easily esta blished in potasium clusters, and the transition regions spread over temperature intervals whic h are wider than in the case of sodium. For all the sizes considered, the percentage melting temperatu re reduction when passing from Na to K clusters is substantially larger than in the bulk. Once thos e two materials have been compared for a number of different cluster sizes, we study the melting-like transition in Rb 55and Cs 55clusters and make a comparison with the melting behavior of Na 55and K 55. As the atomic number increases, the height of the specific heat peaks decreases, their width i ncreases, and the melting temperature decreases as in bulk melting, but in a more pronounced way. PACS numbers: 36.40.Ei 64.70.Dv I. INTRODUCTION The melting transition of a pure bulk material occurs at a well defined temperature for a given external pres- sure. The melting-like transition in small clusters com- posed of a finite number of atoms spreads instead over a temperature interval that widens as the cluster size de- creases. A number of thermal properties sensitive to the cluster size and essentially different from those found in bulk materials emerge in the transition region defined by that temperature interval, which has motivated a lot of theoretical1–8and experimental9–12investigations. The experiments of Schmidt et al.10have shown strong non- monotonic variations of the melting temperature of free sodium clusters with size, which can not be completely explained either by electronic or geometric shell closing arguments. The theoretical simulations have predicted the occurrence of several premelting effects, like surface melting or structural isomerizations, and also the exis- tence of a dynamic coexistence regime, where the cluster can fluctuate in time between being completely solid or liquid. We have previously reported density functional orbital-free molecular dynamics (OFMD) simulations of the melting process in sodium clusters Na N, with N=8,20,55,92, and 142.7,8The OFMD technique13is completely analogous to the method devised by Car and Parrinello (CP) to perform dynamic simulations at an ab initio level,14but the electron density is taken as the dynamic variable,15as opposed to the Kohn-Sham (KS) orbitals16in the original CP method. This technique, whose main advantage over KS-based methods is that the computational effort to update the electronic sys- tem scales linearly with cluster size, has been already used both in solid state17,18and cluster3,19,20physics.Our predictions of the temperatures at which homoge- neous cluster melting occurs were in good agreement with the experiments of Haberland’s group,10,11excepting the enhancement of the melting temperature around N=55, which was not reproduced. We also observed a number of interesting premelting effects, mostly the establishment of a surface melting stage at a temperature lower than the homogeneous melting temperature for Na 20, Na 92and Na142, and several isomerization transitions in Na 8and Na20. It is interesting to study similar systems like clus- ters of K, Rb and Cs in order to assess whether those trends are a general feature of alkali clusters or not. With this goal, we consider in this paper the melting-like tran- sition of K Nclusters, with N=20, 55, 92, and 142, and compare it with that of sodium clusters of the same size. As a second step, for a fixed cluster size of N=55, we study the melting behavior of Rb 55and Cs 55and com- pare it with that of Na 55and K 55. In the next section we briefly present some technical details of the method. The results are presented and discussed in section III and, fi- nally, section IV summarizes our main conclusions. II. THEORY The orbital-free molecular dynamics method is a Car- Parrinello total energy scheme14which uses an explicit kinetic-energy functional of the electron density, and has the electron density as the dynamical variable, as op- posed to the KS single particle wavefunctions. The main features of the energy functional and the calcu- lation scheme have been described at length in previ- ous work,13,17,19,3,7and details of our method are as described by Aguado et al.7In brief, the electronic ki- netic energy functional of the electron density, n(/vector r), cor- 1responds to the gradient expansion around the homoge- neous limit through second order15,21–23 Ts[n] =TTF[n] +1 9TW[n], (1) where the first term is the Thomas-Fermi functional (Hartree atomic units have been used) TTF[n] =3 10(3π2)2/3/integraldisplay n(/vector r)5/3d/vector r, (2) and the second is the lowest order gradient correction, where TW, the von Weizs¨ acker term, is given by TW[n] =1 8/integraldisplay| ∇n(/vector r)|2 n(/vector r)d/vector r. (3) The local density approximation is used for exchange and correlation.24,25In the external field acting on the elec- trons, Vext(/vector r) =/summationtext nv(/vector r−/vectorRn), we take vto be the lo- cal pseudopotential of Fiolhais et al.,26which reproduces well the properties of bulk alkalis and has been shown to have good transferability to alkali clusters.27The clus- ter is placed in a unit cell of a cubic superlattice, and the set of plane waves periodic in the superlattice is used as a basis set to expand the valence density. Following Car and Parrinello,14the coefficients of that expansion are regarded as generalized coordinates of a set of ficti- tious classical particles, and the corresponding Lagrange equations of motion for the ions and the electron density distribution are solved as described in Ref. 7. The calculations used a supercell of edge 71 a.u. for K20and 81 a.u. for K 55, K92, K142, Rb 55and Cs 55. An energy cut-off of 8 Ryd was used in the plane wave expansion of the energy for K clusters, and of 6.15 Ryd for Rb and Cs clusters. In all cases, a 64 ×64×64 grid was used. The cut-offs used give a convergence of bond lengths and binding energies as good as that obtained for sodium clusters.7The fictitious mass associated with the electron density coefficients ranged between 6.3 ×108 and 4.0 ×109a.u., depending on the material and on the temperature of the simulations. The equations of motion of K clusters were integrated using the Verlet algorithm28 for both electrons and ions with a time step ranging from ∆t = 0.83 ×10−15sec. for the simulations performed at the lowest temperatures, to ∆t = 0.67 ×10−15sec. for those at the highest ones. In the case of Rb 55the time steps ranged from ∆t = 2.38 ×10−15sec. to ∆t = 1.31 ×10−15sec, and in the case of Cs 55from ∆t = 4.29 ×10−15sec. to ∆t = 1.79 ×10−15sec. These choices resulted in a conservation of the total energy better than 0.1 % in all cases. Several molecular dynamics simulation runs at differ- ent constant energies were performed in order to obtain the caloric curve for each cluster. The initial positions of the atoms for the first run were taken by slightly de- forming the equilibrium low-temperature geometry of the cluster. The final configuration of each run served as thestarting geometry for the next run at a different energy. The initial velocities for every new run were obtained by scaling the final velocities of the preceding run. The total simulation times for each run at constant energy were 40 ps for K clusters. 80 ps for Rb 55, and 140 ps for Cs55. These different simulation times were chosen in or- der to obtain a good convergence of the several melting indicators described below. They increase with atomic number because the typical atomic vibrational frecuen- cies decrease with atomic number. A number of indicators to locate the melting-like tran- sition were employed. Namely, the specific heat defined by29 Cv= [N−N(1−2 3N−6)< E kin>t< E−1 kin>t]−1, (4) where N is the number of atoms and <>tindicates the average along a trajectory; the root-mean-square (rms) bond length fluctuation1 δ=2 N(N−1)/summationdisplay i<j(< R2 ij>t−< R ij>2 t)1/2 < R ij>t; (5) the “atomic equivalence indexes”30 σi(t) =/summationdisplay j|/vectorRi(t)−/vectorRj(t)|, (6) and finally, the average over a whole dynamical trajectory of the radial atomic distribution function g(r), defined by dNat=g(r)dr (7) where dNat(r) is the number of atoms at distances from the center of mass between r and r + dr. III. RESULTS A very important issue in the simulations of cluster melting is the election of the low-temperature isomer to be heated. A good knowledge of the ground state struc- ture (global minimum) is required, as the details of the melting transition are known to be isomer-dependent.30 But the problem of performing a realistic global opti- mization search is exponentially difficult as size increases , so finding the global minima of clusters with 55 atoms or more becomes impractical. In our previous work8 we directly started from icosahedral isomers for Na 55, Na92and Na 142, as there is some experimental9and theoretical31indications that suggest icosahedral pack- ing in sodium clusters, and found a good agreement with the experimental results of Haberland’s group.10Simu- lated annealing runs for Na 92and Na 142always led to disordered structures with an energy higher than that of 2the corresponding icosahedral isomer. The melting be- havior of these disordered structures was analyced sep- arately and found to be different from that of icosahe- dral clusters.32As the comparison with experiment was favourable only for icosahedral isomers and the total en- ergy of these structures was always lower than that of disordered structures, we have chosen icosahedral isomers in the study of the melting behavior of large alkali clus- ters: K 55, Rb55and Cs 55are complete two-shell icosahe- drons, K 92and K 142are incomplete three-shell icosahe- drons constructed by following the icosahedral growing pattern described by Montejano-Carrizales et al.33The low-temperature isomer of K 20was obtained by the dy- namic simulated annealing technique,14by heating the cluster to 400 K and then slowly reducing the tempera- ture. The resulting structure is essentially the same as that obtained for Na 20with the same technique.7 The temperature evolutions of the specific heat C vand of the rms bond length fluctuation δof K20are shown in Fig 1. The specific heat displays two maxima around 90 K and 130 K. The δ(T) curve has a small positive slope at low temperatures that reflects the thermal expansion of the solidlike cluster, and then two abrupt increases that correlate with the two peaks in the specific heat. Both magnitudes indicate that the melting of K 20occurs in two well separated steps over a wide range of temperatures. To analyce the nature of those two steps we show in Fig. 2 short-time averages of the “atomic equivalence indexes” of K20for a number of representative temperatures. For a temperature at which the cluster is completely solid, theσi(t) curves show a high degeneracy which is specific of the symmetry of the isomer under consideration.30The structure of K 20, as that of Na 20,7can be divided into two subsets: two internal “core” atoms and 18 periph- eral “surface” atoms. The transition at ≈90 K is iden- tified with an isomerization transition in which the 18 peripheral atoms begin to interchange their positions in the cluster while the two central atoms remain oscillat- ing around their initial positions. When a temperature of≈130 K is reached, one of the two inner atoms moves out to the cluster surface, while the other remains in its central position. Then the second transition is iden- tified with another isomerization transition in which a new set of (19+1) isomers begins to be visited. The δ quantity increases with temperature after this point in a smooth way. This is due to the more and more frequent interchanges of the central atom with one of the periph- eral atoms upon increasing the temperature. Neverthe- less, the interchange rate between central and peripheral atoms remains slower than the interchange rate between peripheral atoms for all temperatures considered. Fig. 3 shows the specific heat and δcurves for K 55. The specific heat displays a main assymetric peak cen- tered approximately at 160 K, while δshows two abrupt increases at ≈110 K and 160 K. The second abrupt in- crease in δcoincides with the position of the main spe- cific heat peak. Although the first step in δis not in correspondence with any well-defined specific heat peak,there is a visible shoulder in the low temperature side (a clear assymetry) of that peak. Moreover, the width of the transition region, approximately 100 K, is predicted to be the same with both indicators. The nature of melt- ing is analyced by plotting the temperature evolution of the time-averaged radial atomic density distribution g(r) . At a low temperature of T=86 K, Fig. 4 shows that the atoms are distributed in several icosahedral shells (in the outer shell, the twelve atoms in vertex positions can be distinguished from the rest due to slightly different radial distances). At the temperature where the first step in δ emerges, the detailed structure in the ionic density distri - bution has been washed out by the thermal effects, and the movies show that the cluster surface is melted. How- ever, the different shells are still clearly distinguished, showing that there are not interchanges between atoms in different shells. At a temperature higher than 160 K, the disctintion of the several radial shells is not possi- ble anymore. All the atoms are able to diffuse across the cluster volume, that is both intrashell and intershell displacements are allowed, and the liquid phase is com- pletely established. Upon a further increasing in temper- ature, the only appreciable change in g(r) is due to the thermal expansion of the cluster. The results for K 92are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Both the specific heat and δpredict a two-step melting pro- cess, with a first transition at ≈110 K and a second transition at ≈200 K. As seen in Fig. 6, the first tran- sition is associated again with surface melting, with no substantial intershell diffusion. For temperatures higher than 200 K, the cluster is completely liquid. K 142melts in two main steps, at ≈140 K and 230 K (Fig. 7). There is also a small bump on the low-temperature side of the first specific heat peak, correlated with a small abrupt increase of δat≈90 K. This previous step is associated with an isomerization regime in which different isomers preserving the icosahedral symmetry are visited, and was also found for Na 142.8These isomerizations involve the motion of the five vacancies in the outer shell. The sur- face melting stage is not developed yet, however, as the icosahedral order persists. The distribution of atoms in three shells is still distinguished at a temperature of 190 K where the cluster surface is melted. The average radial ionic density distribution is not completely uniform until the homogeneous melting temperature is reached. The bulk melting temperature of K (337 K)34is re- duced by a 10 % with respect to that of Na (371 K).34 The melting temperatures of K clusters are also smaller than those of Na clusters7,8for all the sizes studied. The percentage reduction in melting temperature is substan- tially larger than in the bulk and a slightly decreasing function of cluster size (19 %, 17 %, 16 % and 15 % for N=20, 55, 92, and 142, respectively). The nature of the several premelting effects observed are similar for both materials. Nevertheless, they are more easily established in the case of K clusters. For example, surface and ho- mogeneous melting temperatures were closer together in the case of Na 142(240 K and 270 K, respectively)8than 3they are for K 142(140 K and 230 K, respectively); while two-step melting was not observed for a perfect two-shell Na55icosahedron,8the melting surface stage is well es- tablished for K 55, which has the same low-temperature structure; in general, the transition region is wider for K than for Na clusters. As the main points in this comparison are quite inde- pendent of cluster size, we analyce in the following the melting behavior of Rb and Cs clusters for a fixed clus- ter size, namely N=55. Specific heat and δcurves as a function of temperature are given in Figs. 9 and 10. The results are similar to those obtained for K 55, namely a main assymetric specific heat peak and two steps in δ, the last of which correlates with the peak in the specific heat. The radial ionic density distributions of both materials present a similar temperature dependence and only the results for Cs 55are shown in Fig. 11. The first transition (at≈110 K for Rb 55and≈90 K for Cs 55) is identified with surface melting: Fig. 11 at 110 K shows that inter- shell diffusion is not important yet. The second (at ≈140 K for Rb 55and 130 K for Cs 55) corresponds to homoge- neous melting. We find that the different alkali clusters with N=55 atoms melt in a similar way. The main dif- ferences are the following: a) The homogeneous melting temperature decreases with increasing atomic number as in the bulk case, but in a more pronounced way. Specif- ically, in the series Na →K→Rb→Cs, the bulk melting temperatures decrease by percentage values of 10 %, 7 %, and 3 %, respectively,34while for the 55-atom clus- ters the corresponding percentage values are 17 %, 12.5 %, and 7 %, respectively; b) The height of the specific heat peaks decreases and their width increases with in- creasing atomic number; c) Premelting effects are more important for the heavier elements. Specifically, two-step melting was not observed in the case of Na 55,8while a well defined surface melting stage is observed in the ther- mal evolution of K 55, Rb55and Cs 55. It is perhaps not surprising that the melting tempera- ture reduction is larger in clusters compared to the bulk phase, where coordination effects associated with a large proportion of atoms in surface-like positions do not ap- pear. But a meaningful comparison can not be done due to the different structures adopted by alkali elements in the cluster (icosahedral packing) and bulk (bcc packing) phases. The other two points do not invoke any com- parison with the bulk phase, and can be more conve- niently addressed. Rey at al.35have analyced the in- fluence of the softness of the repulsive core interaction on cluster melting. Specifically, a series of pair poten- tials differing just in their shape in the core region was constructed and used to investigate the melting behav- ior of 13-particle clusters. For those potentials with soft core repulsion, two-step melting was observed: the first step corresponds to the onset of frequent isomerizations involving only the surface atoms, while the second corre- sponds to homogeneous melting, involving also the cen- tral atom. For the harder potentials, those two steps merge into one, and melting-in-steps processes do not ap-pear. The repulsive part of our pseudopotential is harder the lighter is the alkali element,26so the importance of premelting effects can be expected to increase in the se- ries Na →K→Rb→Cs. In effect, a well-defined surface melting stage is not observed for Na 55, while it develops before the homogeneous melting point for the heavier al- kali elements. Moseler and Nordiek36have studied the influence of the potential range on the heat capacity of 13-atom Morse clusters. They have found that decreasing the range of the potential increases the peak of the heat capacity in the melting transition region. The range of our pseudopotential increases with atomic number for the alkali elements,26so a decrease in the height of the spe- cific heat peak is expected in the series Na →K→Rb→Cs. This is what is observed indeed. Thus, we conclude that melting proceeds in a qualitatively similar way in clus- ters of the alkali elements Na, K, Rb and Cs, and that the small existing differences can be explained in terms of the different parameters defining the corresponding local pseudopotentials. A few comments regarding the quality of the simu- lations and of the annealing runs are perhaps in order here. The orbital-free representation of the atomic in- teractions is much more efficient than the more accurate KS treatments, but is still substantially more expensive computationally than a simulation using phenomenolog- ical many-body potentials. Such potentials contain a number of parameters that are usually chosen by fitting some bulk and/or molecular properties. In contrast our model is free of external parameters, although there are approximations in the kinetic and exchange-correlation functionals. The orbital-free scheme accounts, albeit ap- proximately, for the effects of the detailed electronic dis- tribution on the total energy and the forces on the ions. We feel that this is particularly important in metallic clusters for which a large proportion of atoms are on the surface and experience a very different electronic envi- ronment than an atom in the interior. Furthermore, the adjustment of the electronic structure and consequently the energy and forces to rearrangements of the ions is also taken into account. But the price to be paid for the more accurate description of the interactions is a less complete statistical sampling of the phase space. The simulation times are substantially shorter than those that can be achieved in phenomenological simulations. Nevertheless, we expect that the locations of the several transitions are reliable, because all the indicators we have used, both thermal and structural ones, are in essential agreement on the temperature at which the transitions start. IV. SUMMARY The melting-like transition in K N, with N=20, 55, 92 and 142, Rb 55and Cs 55clusters has been investigated by applying an orbital-free, density-functional molecu- lar dynamics method. The computational effort which 4is required is modest in comparison with the traditional Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics technique based on Kohn-Sham orbitals, that would be very costly for clus- ters of these sizes. The details of the several transitions have been explained and found to be similar to those found in the melting-like transition of sodium clusters:7,8 alkali clusters show generally a separate surface melting stage prior to homogeneous melting. The homogeneous melting temperature has been found to decrease with in- creasing atomic number as in the bulk limit, but the per- centage value of this temperature reduction is larger than for the bulk materials, due to the larger proportion of surface-like atoms existing in the cluster; in fact, the re- duction in melting temperature when passing from Na to K clusters slightly decreases with increasing cluster size . The height of the specific heat peaks decreases and their width increases with increasing atomic number, and the premelting effects are more important for the heavier al- kalis. These trends have been rationalized in terms of physical features of the local pseudopotentials employed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This work has been supported by DGES (Grant PB98-0368) and Junta de Castilla y Le´ on (VA70/99). The author acknowledges useful discussions with J. M. L´ opez. Captions of Figures. Figure 1 Specific heat (a) and δ(b) curves of K 20, tak- ing the internal cluster temperature as the independent variable. The deviation around the mean temperature is smaller than the size of the circles. Figure 2 Short-time averaged distances < ri(t)>sta between each atom and the center of mass in K 20, as functions of time for four representative values of the internal temperature. The bold lines follow the evolution of particular atoms. Figure 3 Specific heat (a) and δ(b) curves of K 55, tak- ing the internal cluster temperature as the independent variable. The deviation around the mean temperature is smaller than the size of the circles. Figure 4 Time averaged radial atomic density distri- bution of K 55, at four representative temperatures. Figure 5 Specific heat (a) and δ(b) curves of K 92, tak- ing the internal cluster temperature as the independent variable. The deviation around the mean temperature is smaller than the size of the circles. Figure 6 Time averaged radial atomic density distri- bution of K 92, at four representative temperatures. Figure 7 Specific heat (a) and δ(b) curves of K 142, taking the internal cluster temperature as the indepen- dent variable. The deviation around the mean tempera- ture is smaller than the size of the circles. Figure 8 Time averaged radial atomic density distri- bution of K 142, at four representative temperatures. Figure 9 Specific heat (a) and δ(b) curves of Rb 55, taking the internal cluster temperature as the indepen-dent variable. The deviation around the mean tempera- ture is smaller than the size of the circles. Figure 10 Specific heat (a) and δ(b) curves of Cs 55, taking the internal cluster temperature as the indepen- dent variable. The deviation around the mean tempera- ture is smaller than the size of the circles. Figure 11 Time averaged radial atomic density dis- tribution of Cs 55, at four representative temperatures. 1J. Jellinek, T. L. Beck, and R. S. Berry, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2783 (1986); H. L. Davis, J. Jellinek, and R. S. Berry, ibid. 86, 6456 (1987); T. L. Beck, J. Jellinek, and R. S. Berry, ibid.87, 545 (1987); H. P. Cheng and R. S. Berry, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7969 (1991); J. P. Rose and R. S. Berry, ibid.96, 517 (1992); ibid.98, 3246 (1993); ibid.98, 3262 (1993); Z. B. G¨ uvenc and J. Jellinek, Z. Phys. D 26, 304 (1993); V. K. W. Cheng, J. P. Rose, and R. S. Berry, Surf. Rev. Lett. 3, 347 (1996). 2A. Bulgac and D. Kusnezov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1335 (1992); Phys. Rev. B 45, 1988 (1992); N. Ju and A. Bulgac, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2721 (1993); M. Fosmire and A. Bulgac, ibid.52, 17509 (1995); J. M. Thompson and A. Bulgac, ibid.40, 462 (1997); L. J. Lewis, P. Jensen, and J. L. Bar- rat,ibid.56, 2248 (1997); S. K. Nayak, S. N. Khanna, B. K. Rao, and P. Jena, J. Phys: Condens. Matter 10, 10853 (1998). F. Calvo and P. Labastie, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 2051 (1998); J. P. K. Doye and D. J. Wales, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2292 (1999); J. Chem. Phys. 111, 11070 (1999). 3P. Blaise, S. A. Blundell, and C. Guet, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15856 (1997). 4A. Rytk¨ onen, H. H¨ akkinen, and M. Manninen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3940 (1998). 5C. L. Cleveland, W. D. Luedtke, and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2036 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 60, 5065 (1999). 6F. Calvo and F. Spiegelmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2270 (1999); J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2888 (2000). 7A. Aguado, J. M. L´ opez, J. A. Alonso, and M. J. Stott, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6026 (1999). 8A. Aguado, J. M. L´ opez, J. A. Alonso, and M. J. Stott, J. Phys. Chem. B, submitted (preprint available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/9911042). 9T. P. Martin, Phys. Rep. 273, 199 (1996). 10M. Schmidt, R. Kusche, W. Kronm¨ uller, B. von Is- sendorff, and H. Haberland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 99 (1997); M. Schmidt, R. Kusche, B. von Issendorff, and H. Haber- land, Nature 393, 238 (1998); R. Kusche, Th. Hippler, M. Schmidt, B. von Issendorff, and H. Haberland, Eur. Phys. J. D9, 1 (1999). 11M. Schmidt, C. Ellert, W. Kronm¨ uller, and H. Haberland, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10970 (1999). 12H. Haberland, in “ Metal Clusters ”, ed. W. Ekardt (John Wiley & Sons, 1999), p. 181. 13M. Pearson, E. Smargiassi, and P. A. Madden, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 3221 (1993). 14R. Car and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2471 (1985); 5M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Allan, T. A. Arias, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1045 (1992). 15P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, 864B (1964). 16W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, 1133A (1965). 17E. Smargiassi and P. A. Madden, Phys. Rev. B 49, 5220 (1994); M. Foley, E. Smargiassi, and P. A. Madden, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 5231 (1994); E. Smargiassi and P. A. Madden, Phys. Rev. B 51, 117 (1995); ibid.51, 129 (1995); M. Foley and P. A. Madden, ibid.53, 10589 (1996); B. J. Jesson, M. Foley, and P. A. Madden, ibid.55, 4941 (1997); J. A. Anta, B. J. Jesson, and P. A. Madden, ibid.58, 6124 (1998). 18N. Govind, Y. A. Wang, and E. A. Carter, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 7677 (1999). 19V. Shah, D. Nehete, and D. G. Kanhere, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter 6, 10773 (1994); D. Nehete, V. Shah, and D. G. Kanhere, Phys. Rev. B 53, 2126 (1996); V. Shah and D. G. Kanhere, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, L253 (1996); V. Shah, D. G. Kanhere, C. Majumber, and G. P. Das, ibid.9, 2165 (1997); A. Vichare and D. G. Kanhere, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 3309 (1998); A. Vichare and D. G. Kanhere, Eur. Phys. J. D 4, 89 (1998); A. Dhavale, V. Shah, and D. G. Kanhere, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4522 (1998). 20N. Govind, J. L. Mozos, and H. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 51, 7101 (1995); Y. A. Wang, N. Govind, and E. A. Carter, ibid.58, 13465 (1998). 21Theory of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Editors S. Lundqvist and N. H. March. Plenum Press, New York (1983). 22W. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 34, 4575 (1986). 23J. P. Perdew, Phys. Lett. A 165, 79 (1992). 24J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981). 25D. Ceperley and B. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980). 26C. Fiolhais, J. P. Perdew, S. Q. Armster, J. M. McLaren, and H. Brajczewska, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14001 (1995); ibid. 53, 13193 (1996); ibid.59, 2570 (1999). 27F. Nogueira, C. Fiolhais, J. He, J. P. Perdew, and A. Rubio, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 287 (1996). 28L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. 159, 98 (1967); W. C. Swope and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 637 (1982). 29S. Sugano, Microcluster Physics , Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1991). 30V. Bonaci´ c-Kouteck´ y, J. Jellinek, M. Wiechert, and P. Fan - tucci, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 6321 (1997); D. Reichardt, V. Bonaci´ c-Kouteck´ y, P. Fantucci, and J. Jellinek, Chem. Phys. Lett. 279, 129 (1997). 31S. K¨ ummel, P. -G. Reinhard, and M. Brack, Eur. Phys. J. D 9, 149 (1999); S. K¨ ummel, M. Brack, and P. -G. Reinhard, unpublished results. 32A. Aguado, unpublished results. 33J. M. Montejano-Carrizales, M. P. I˜ niguez, J. A. Alonso, and M. J. L´ opez, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5961 (1996). 34N. M. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics , Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1976). 35C. Rey, J. Garc´ ıa-Rodeja, L. J. Gallego, and M. J. Grimson, ibid.57, 4420 (1998). 36M. Moseler and J. Nordiek, Phys. Rev. B 60, 11734 (1999). 6[ 0 50 100 150 200 250 T (K)3.03.54.04.5Specific Heat (Kb) 70 50 100 150 200 250 T (K)0.000.100.200.300.40δ 810000 20000 30000 t (fs)190270350<σi(t)>sta (bohr)10000 20000 30000t (fs) 190215240265290315<σi(t)>sta (bohr) 10000 20000 t (fs)190240290340 <σi(t)>sta (bohr)10000 20000 30000t (fs) 190240290 <σi(t)>sta (bohr) 52 K 86 K 133 K190 K 90 100 200 300 T (K)2.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.0Specific heat (Kb) 100 100 200 300 T (K)0.00.10.20.3δ 110 5 10 15 20 r (bohr)0.01.02.03.04.0g(r) (a. u.)0.00.51.01.5 g(r) (a. u.)0.00.20.40.60.8g(r) (a. u.)0.00.20.40.60.8 g (r) (a. u.) 86 K112 K174 K213 K 120 100 200 300 T (K)3.03.54.04.55.05.5Specific Heat (kB) 130 100 200 300 T (K)0.000.100.200.30δ 140 10 20 30 r (bohr)0.01.53.04.5g(r) (a. u.)0.00.51.01.5 g(r) (a. u.)0.00.51.0g(r) (a. u.)0.00.51.0 g(r) (a. u.) 67 K115 K200 K260 K 150 100 200 300 T (K)3.03.54.04.55.05.56.0Specific Heat (kB) 160 100 200 300 T (K)0.00.10.20.3δ 170.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 r (bohr)0.02.04.06.08.0g(r) (a. u.)0.01.02.03.0 g(r) (a. u.)0.00.51.01.52.0g(r) (a. u.)0.00.51.01.5 g(r) (a. u.) 84 K118 K190 K250 K 180 100 200 T (K)3.03.54.04.55.05.5Specific Heat (kB) 190 100 200 T (K)0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.35δ 200 100 200 300 T (K)3.03.54.04.55.0Specific Heat (kB) 210 100 200 300 T (K)0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.35Specific Heat (kB) 220.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 r (bohr)0.00.51.01.52.0g(r) (a. u.)0.00.20.40.60.81.0 g(r) (a. u.)0.00.20.40.60.8g(r) (a. u.)0.00.20.40.60.8 g(r) (a. u.) 63 K110 K124 K157 K 23

arXiv:physics/0005054v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 22 May 2000A Numerical Study of Capillary and Viscous Drainage in Porous Media Eyvind Aker,1,2,4Alex Hansen1,2,3and Knut Jørgen M˚ aløy4 1Department of Physics, University of Science and Technolog y, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway 2Niels Bohr Institute, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 3Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics, DK-2100 Copenha gen, Denmark 4Department of Physics, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Nor wayABSTRACT This paper concentrates on the flow prop- erties when one fluid displaces another fluid in a two-dimensional (2D) network of pores and throats. We consider the scale where individual pores enter the description and we use a network model to simulate the dis- placement process. We study the interplay between the pres- sure build up in the fluids and the dis- placement structure in drainage. We find that our network model properly describes the pressure buildup due to capillary and viscous forces and that there is good cor- respondence between the simulated evolu- tion of the fluid pressures and earlier results from experiments and simulations in slow drainage. We investigate the burst dynamics in drainage going from low to high injection rate at various fluid viscosities. The bursts are identified as pressure drops in the pres- sure signal across the system. We find that the statistical distribution of pressure drops scales according to other systems exhibiting self-organized criticality. We compare our results to corresponding experiments. We also study the stabilization mecha- nisms of the invasion front in horizontal 2D drainage. We focus on the process when the front stabilizes due to the viscous forces in the liquids. We find that the difference in capillary pressure between two different points along the front varies almost linearly as function of length separation in the di- rection of the displacement. The numer- ical results support new arguments about the displacement process from those earlier suggested for viscous stabilization. Our ar- guments are based on the observation thatnonwetting fluid flows in loopless strands (paths) and we conclude that earlier sug- gested theories are not suitable to drainage when nonwetting strands dominate the dis- placement process. We also show that the arguments might influence the scaling be- havior of the front width as function of the injection rate and compare some of our re- sults to experimental work. 1 INTRODUCTION Two-phase displacements in porous media have received much attention during the last two decades. In modern physics, the process is of great interest due to the variety of structures obtained when changing the fluid properties like wettability, interfacial tension, viscosities and displacement rate. The different structures obtained have been organized into three flow regimes: viscous fingering [1,2], stable displacement [3], and capillary fingering [4–6]. Viscous fingering is characterized by an unstable front of fin- gers that is generated when nonwetting and less viscous fluid is displacing wetting and more viscous fluid at relative high injection rate. The fingering structure is found to be fractal with fractal dimension D= 1.62 [1, 2]. Stable displacement is named after the relative flat and stable front that is be- ing generated when a nonwetting and more viscous fluid displaces a wetting and less viscous fluid at relative high injection rate. The last scenario, capillary fingering, is ob- tained when a nonwetting fluid very slowly displaces a wetting fluid. At sufficiently low injection rate the invasion fluid generates a pattern similar to the cluster formed by invasion percolation [4,7–9]. The displace- 1ment is now solely controlled by the capil- lary pressure, that is the pressure difference between the two fluids across a meniscus in a pore. Fluid flow in porous media has also been intensively studied because of important applications in a wide range of different technologies. The most important areas that to a great extent depend on proper- ties of fluid flow in porous media, are oil recovery and hydrology. In oil recovery, petroleum engineers are continuously de- volving improved techniques to increase the amount of oil they are able to achieve from the oil reservoirs. In hydrology, one impor- tant concern is often to avoid pollution of ground water from human activity. The simulation model presented in this paper is developed to study the dynamics of the temporal evolution of the fluid pressures when a nonwetting fluid displaces a wetting fluid at constant injection rate. With the model we study the pressure in the fluids caused by the viscous forces as well as the capillary forces due to the menisci in the pores. The model porous medium consists of a tube network where the tubes are con- nected together to form a square lattice. Numerical simulations of fluid flow in porous media using a network of tubes was first proposed by Fatt[10] in 1956. Since then a large number of publications related to network models and pore-scale displacements have appeared in the litera- ture [1, 3, 11–23]. Often mentioned is the classic work of Lenormand et al. [3] who were the first to systematically classify the displacement structures into the three flow regimes: viscous fingering, stable displace- ment and capillary fingering. Including the work of Lenormand et al., it appears thatmost network models have been used to study statistical properties of the displace- ment structures or to calculate macroscopic properties like fluid saturations and relative permeabilities. There have been several attempts to sim- ulate the displacement process by using different types of growth algorithms. In 1983Wilkinson andWillemsen [9] formu- lated a new form of percolation theory, in- vasion percolation (IP), that corresponds to slow drainage, i.e. capillary fingering. In 1984Paterson [24] was the first to discover the remarkable parallels between diffusion- limited aggregation (DLA) [25] and viscous fingering. He also showed similarities be- tween anti-DLA and stable displacement. The disadvantage with the growth algo- rithms is that they do not contain any phys- ical time and they have so far not been suit- able to study the cross over between the different flow regimes. However, attempts have been made to use DLA and IP to study dynamics of viscous fingering [26] and slow drainage [27,28], respectively. In slow drainage it is observed that the invasion of nonwetting fluid occurs in a se- ries of bursts accompanied by sudden neg- ative drops in the pressure called Haines jumps [27–29] (see Fig. 1). This type of dy- namics is very important for the temporal evolution of the pressure in drainage, and in most network models the effect is neglected. Consequently, only very few network mod- els [21] have been used to study the inter- play between fluid pressures and displace- ment structures, and many questions ad- dressing this topic are still open. We will attempt to answer some of them in this paper, by making a model whose proper- ties are closer to those of real porous me- 2Pore neck Figure 1: Nonwetting fluid (white) invades a 2D porous medium initially filled with wetting fluid (shaded). As the nonwetting fluid is pumped into the system (a) the menisci move into narrower parts of the pore necks and the capillary pressure in- creases (b). During a burst the invading fluid covers new pores and the neighbor- ing menisci readjust back to larger radii and the capillary pressure decreases everywhere (c) [27]. The arrow in (a) is pointing at a pore neck having a shape of an hourglass. dia. To model the burst dynamics, we have been motivated by the hourglass shaped pore necks in Fig. 1. As a result we let the tubes in our network model behave as if they were hourglass shaped with respect to the capillary pressure. Thus, the capillary pressure of a meniscus starts at zero when the meniscus enters the tube and increases towards a maximum value at the middle of the tube where the tube is most narrow, be- fore the capillary pressure decreases to zero again when the meniscus leave the tube. The advantage of the above approach is a network model that reproduces the burst dynamics and the corresponding pressure evolution. We are also able to study in de- tail the capillary pressure of each meniscus along the front as it moves through the net- work. Similar measurements can hardly be done experimentally.We use the model to study the burst dy- namics going from low to high displacement rates. To do so, we examine the statistical properties of the sudden negative pressure drops due to bursts. We find that for a wide range of displacement rates and fluid viscosities, the pressure drops act in anal- ogy to theoretical predictions of systems exhibiting self-organized criticality, such as IP. Even at high injection rates, where the connection between the displacement pro- cess and IP is more open, the pressure drops behave similar to the case of extreme low injection rate, where IP apply. Further, we report on the behavior of the capillary pressure along the invasion front and investigate the stabilization mech- anisms of horizontal drainage. We present theoretical arguments predicting the behav- ior of the pressure along the front, and we conclude that the difference in pressure be- tween two different points along the front should depend almost linearly as function of the distance between the two points in the direction of the displacement. The theoret- ical arguments are based on the observation that the nonwetting fluid displaces the wet- ting fluid through separate loopless strands (paths). Numerical simulations of the cap- illary pressure along the front supports the theoretical arguments. We note that earlier suggested views [30–33] concerning the be- havior of the pressure along the front, is not compatible with our results. Unfortunately, the detailed modeling of the menisci’s movements and their capillary pressures makes the model computationally heavy and reduces the system size that is attainable within feasible amount of CPU time. The paper is organized as follows. In Sec- 3tion 2 we present the network model and describe briefly its numerical implementa- tion. The rest of the sections discuss the main results that we have got from numer- ical experiments with the network model. In section 3 we discuss the evolution of the simulated pressure in drainage and calcu- late the statistics of the bursts. We also compare some of our results to experimental work. Section 4 presents theoretical argu- ments about the stabilization mechanisms of the front in drainage. The arguments are supported by numerical simulations with the network model. This section also con- tains experimental work that is related to the numerical simulations. A summary of the results and concluding remarks are pro- vided in Section 5. 2 SIMULATION MODEL The network model is thoroughly discussed in Ref. [34], and it has also been presented briefly in Refs. [35,36]. Therefore, only its main features are described in this section. The model porous medium consists of a square lattice of cylindrical tubes of length doriented at 45◦to the longest side of the lattice. Four tubes meet at each intersec- tion where we put a node having no volume. The disorder is introduced by (1) assigning the tubes a radius rchosen at random inside the interval [ λ1d, λ2d] where 0 ≤λ1<λ2≤1 or (2) moving the intersections a randomly chosen distance away from their initial po- sitions. The randomly chosen distances are less than 1 /2 of the distance between the nearest neighbor intersections to avoid over- Figure 2: Example of a displacement struc- ture from one simulation. The nonwetting fluid (black) is injected from below and dis- places the wetting fluid (grey) that escapes along the top row. The front between the nonwetting and wetting phase is defined as the line separating the compact wetting phase and the nonwetting fluid. Note the trapped regions of wetting fluid that are left behind and surround by nonwetting fluid. lapping nodes. In (1) all tubes have equal dbut different r. (2) results in a distorted square lattice giving the tubes different d’s. In (2) r=d/2αwhere αis the aspect ra- tio between the tube length and its radius. The reason for making a distorted lattice of tubes is to get closer to a real pore-throat geometry as shown in Fig. 1 [36]. Figure 2 shows an example of a displace- ment structure that is obtained from one simulation. The nonwetting fluid (black) of viscosity µnwis injected along the in- let (bottom row) and displaces the wetting fluid (grey) of viscosity µw. The fluids flow from the bottom to the top of the lattice, and there are periodical boundary condi- tions in the orthogonal direction. We as- 4sume that the fluids are immiscible and in- compressible. A meniscus is located in the tubes where nonwetting and wetting fluids meet. The capillary pressure pcof a meniscus in a cylindrical tube of radius ris given by Young-Laplace law, pc=2γ rcosθ, (1) under the assumption that the principal radii of the curvature of the meniscus are equal to the radius of the tube. θdenotes the wetting angle between the cylinder wall and the wetting fluid, i.e. 0◦≤θ <90◦in drainage. In the network model we treat the tubes as if they were hourglass shaped with re- spect to the capillary pressure. Therefore, we let the capillary pressure depend on where the meniscus is situated in the tube. Instead of Eq. (1) we let pcof a meniscus vary in the following way: pc=2γ r/bracketleftBig 1−cos/parenleftBig 2πx d/parenrightBig/bracketrightBig . (2) Here we have assumed that the wetting fluid perfectly wets the medium, i.e. θ= 0. In the above relation xdenotes the position of the meniscus in the tube (0 ≤x≤d), giv- ing that pc= 0 at the entrance and at the exit of the tube and reaches a maximum of 4γ/rin the middle of the tube ( x=d/2). Practically, the wetting angle of a meniscus and thereby its capillary pressure may gen- erally be different depending on whether the meniscus retires from or invades the tube. To avoid numerical complications this effect is neglected in the present model. We solve the volume flux through each tube by using Hagen-Poiseuille flow for cy-lindrical tubes and the Washburn approxi- mation [37] for menisci under motion. Let qijdenote the volume flux through the tube from the ith to the jth node, then we have qij=−σijkij µij1 dij(∆pij−pc,ij).(3) Here kijis the permeability of the tube (r2 ij/8) and σijis the cross section ( πr2 ij) of the tube. µijdenotes the effective vis- cosity, that is the sum of the volume frac- tions of each fluid inside the tube multiplied by their respective viscosities. The pres- sure drop across the tube is ∆ pij=pj−pi, where piandpjis the pressures at node i andj, respectively. The capillary pressure pc,ijis the sum of the capillary pressures of each menisci [given by Eq. (2)] that are present inside the tube. A tube partially filled with both liquids is allowed to con- tain at maximum two menisci. For a tube without menisci, pc,ij= 0. We only con- sider horizontal flow, and therefore we ne- glect gravity. We have conservation of volume flux at each node giving /summationdisplay jqij= 0. (4) The summation on jruns over the near- est neighbor nodes to the ith node while i runs over all nodes that do not belong to the top or bottom rows, that is, the inter- nal nodes. Eqs. (3) and (4) constitute a set of linear equations which we solve for the nodal pressures pi, with the constraint that the pressures at the nodes belonging to the upper and lower rows are kept fixed. The set of equations is solved by using the Con- jugate Gradient method [38]. 5In the simulations we impose the injec- tion rate Qon the inlet, therefore we have to find the pressure across the lattice ∆ P, that corresponds to the given Q. Having found ∆ Pwe use this pressure to calculate the correct pi’s in Eq. (3). In short, we find ∆Pby considering the relation Q=A∆P+B. (5) The first part of Eq. (5) results from Darcy’s law for single phase flow through porous media. The second part comes from the capillary pressure between the two fluids (i.e.B= 0 if no menisci are present in the network). Eq. (5) has two unknowns, Aand B, which we calculate by solving Eq. (4) twice for two different applied pressures ∆P′and ∆ P′′, across the lattice. From those two solutions we find the correspond- ing injection rates Q′andQ′′. Inserting Q′,Q′′, ∆P′, and ∆ P′′into Eq. (5) results in two equations which we solve for Aand B. Finally, we find the correct ∆ Pdue to the imposed Qby rewriting Eq. (5), giving ∆P= (Q−B)/A. See Refs. [34,35] for fur- ther details on how the pi’s are calculated after ∆ Pis found. Given the correct solution of piwe calcu- late the volume flux qijthrough each tube in the lattice, using Eq. (3). Having found theqij’s, we define a time step ∆ tsuch that every meniscus is allowed to travel at most a maximum step length ∆ xmaxduring that time step. Each meniscus is moved a dis- tance ( qij/σij)∆tand the total time lapse is recorded before the nodal pressures pi, are solved for the new fluid configuration. Menisci that are moved out of a tube dur- ing a time step are spread into neighboring tubes as described in Refs. [34,35].3 TEMPORAL EVO- LUTION OF FLUID PRESSURE To characterize the different fluid properties used in the simulations, we use the capil- lary number Caand the viscosity ratio M. The capillary number indicates the ratio be- tween viscous and capillary forces and in the simulations it is defined as Ca≡Qµ Σγ. (6) HereQis the injection rate of the nonwet- ting fluid, µis the maximum viscosity of the nonwetting and wetting fluid and Σ is equal to the length of the inlet times the average thickness of the lattice, i.e. Σ is the cross section of the inlet. γis the fluid-fluid interface tension. The viscosity ratio M, is defined as M≡µnw µw, (7) where µnwandµwis the viscosity of the invading nonwetting fluid and the defending wetting fluid, respectively. 3.1 TRAPPED FLUID AND PRESSURE BUILDUP The pressure across the system is found from Eq. (5) giving ∆P=Q A+Pcg, (8) where Pcg≡ −B/Adefines the global cap- illary pressure of the system. As will be- come clear below, Pcgcontains the capil- lary pressures of the menisci surrounding 60 50 100 150 Time (s)0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0Pressure (103 dyn/cm2) 0 50 100 150 Time (s)01020304050A0/A (a) (b)(c)40×40 nodes Ca=4.6×10−3 M=100 Figure 3: ∆ P(a),Pcg(b), and A0/A(c) as function of injection time. Ca= 4.6×10−3 andM= 100. The vertical dashed line is drawn at the saturation time, ts. the trapped wetting fluid (cluster menisci) and the capillary pressures of the menisci along the invasion front (front menisci) (see Fig. 2). Figure 3 shows the simulated pressures ∆PandPcgfor a displacement at Ca= 4.6×10−3andM= 100. The front width was observed to stabilize after some time ts, and a typical compact pattern of small clus- ters of wetting fluid developed behind the front. From Fig. 3 we observe that both ∆ P andPcgincreases as the more viscous fluid is pumped into the system. When t > t s they even tend to increase linearly as func- tion of time. The driving mechanism in the displace- ment is the pressure gradient between the inlet and the front causing a viscous drag on the trapped clusters. At moderate in- jection rates these clusters are immobile, thus the viscous drag is balanced by capil-lary forces along the interface of the cluster. On average the sum of the capillary forces from each cluster contributes to Pcgby a certain amount making Pcgproportional to the number of clusters behind the front. Af- ter the front has saturated with fully devel- oped clusters behind ( t > t s), the number of clusters are expected to increase linearly with the amount of injected fluid. Since the injection rate is held fixed we recognize thatPcgmust increase linearly as function of time. The argument does not apply when t < t s, due to the fractal development of the front before saturation. In Fig. 3 we have also plotted A0/Awhich is the normalized difference between ∆ P andPcg[see Eq. (8)]. A0is equal to the proportionality factor between Qand ∆ P when only one phase flows through the lat- tice (i.e. Pcg= 0). We observe that A0/A tends to increase linearly as function of time when t > t s. From Eq. (5) we interpret Aas the total conductance of the lattice, and the reciprocal of that is the total re- sistance. The total resistance depends on the fluid configuration and the geometry of the network. Locally, the fluid config- uration changes as nonwetting fluid invades the system, however, the linear behavior ofA0/Aindicates that the overall displace- ment structure is statistically invariant with respect to the injection time. That means, after the front has saturated ( t > t s) the displacement structure might be assigned a constant resistance per unit length. In the special case when M= 1 (vis- cosity matched fluids) the total resistance, 1/A, was found to be constant indepen- dent of the injection rate or displacement structure. This somewhat surprising result might be explained by the following con- 70 200 400 600 800 Time (s)-1.00.01.02.0Normalized pressure Ca=3.5×10-4M=1.0×10-3(a) (b) Figure 4: Pcf(a) and Pcg(b) as function of injection time at Ca= 3.5×10−4andM= 1.0×10−3. To avoid overlapping curves Pcg was subtracted by 1000 dyn /cm2before it was normalized. sideration. When M= 1 the effective vis- cosity µij, of each tube is independent of the amount of wetting and nonwetting fluid that occupies the tube. Hence, each tube has a constant mobility of kij/µijgiving a constant total resistance of the network. At low Cawe approach the regime of capillary fingering and the viscous drag on the clusters becomes negligible. Hence, Pcg is no longer a linear function of the in- jection time, but reduces to that describ- ing the capillary pressure along the front. This is observed in Fig. 4 where we com- parePcgwith the calculated average cap- illary pressure along the front, Pcf. In the simulations, Pcfis calculated by taking the mean of the capillary pressures of the front menisci. From the figure we see that Pcg≃Pcf, as expected. The big jumps in the pressure functions in Fig. 4 are caused by the variations in the capillary pressureas menisci move through the “hourglass” shaped tubes. The negative jumps are iden- tified as bursts where a meniscus proceeds abruptly [27,29] to fill the tube with non- wetting fluid (see also Sec. 3.2 for further details). From the above discussion we conclude that the behavior of Pcgat large times ( t > ts) may be formulated as Pcg= ∆ mch+Pmf, (9) where ∆ mcis the proportionality factor be- tween Pcgand the average front position h above the inlet. ∆ mcis given by the viscous drag on the clusters and Pmfis the variation in the capillary pressure when the invasion front covers new tubes. his only defined af- ter the front has saturated, i.e. hs< h < L , where hsis the average front position at ts andLis the length of the system. Since the injection rate is held fixed, his proportional to the injection time t. In the limit of very low injection rates, ∆ mc→0. When the average front position has reached the outlet, i.e. h=Lin Eq. (9), only invading fluid flows through the sys- tem and Pmf= 0. In this limit Darcy’s law applied on the nonwetting phase gives U= (Ke/µnw)(∆P/L), where Keis the effec- tive permeability of the nonwetting phase. From Eqs. (8) and (9) we find that ∆ P= Q/A+∆ mcL, which inserted into the Darcy equation gives Ke=µnw 1/σT+ ∆ mc/U. (10) HereσT≡AL/Σ denotes the total con- ductivity of the lattice. Thus, we might consider the effective permeability of the nonwetting phase as a function of the con- ductivity of the lattice and an additional 8term due to the viscous drag on the clus- ters (∆ mc/U). Note that the Udependency in Eq. (10) only indicates changes in ∆ mc between displacements executed at different injection rates. The behavior when the flow rate changes during a given displacement is not discussed here. 3.2 BURST DYNAMICS In the simulations a burst starts when the pressure drops suddenly and stops when the pressure has raised to a value above the pressure that initiated the burst (see Fig. 5). Thus, a burst may consist of a large pressure valley containing a hierarchi- cal structure of smaller pressure jumps ( i.e. bursts) inside. A pressure jump, indicated as ∆pin Fig. 5, is the pressure difference from the point when the pressure starts de- creasing minus the pressure when it stops decreasing. We define the size of the pres- sure valley (valley size) to be χ≡/summationtext i∆pi, where the summation index iruns over all the pressure jumps ∆ piinside the valley. The definition is motivated by experimen- tal work in Ref. [28]. For slow displace- ments we have that χis proportional to the geometric burst size s, being invaded dur- ing the pressure valley. This statement has been justified in Ref. [28], where it was ob- served that in stable periods, the pressure increased linearly as function of the volume being injected into the system. Later, in an unstable period where the pressure drops abruptly due to a burst, this pressure drop is proportional to s. At fast displacements the pressure may no longer be a linear func- tion of the volume injected into the system. Therefore, a better estimate of sthere, is to compute the time period Tof the pres-315 320 325 330 335 340 345 t (s)1900210023002500270029003100P(t) (dyn/cm2)burst ∆pt1t2 Figure 5: The pressure signal as function of injection time, P(t), for one simulation at low displacement rate in a narrow time in- terval. The horizontal line defines the pres- sure valley of a burst that last a time period T=t2−t1. Note that the valley may con- tain a hierarchical structure of smaller val- leys inside. The vertical line indicates the size of a local pressure jump ∆ pinside the valley. sure valley (Fig. 5). Since the displacements are performed with constant rate, it is rea- sonable to assume that Tis always propor- tional to the volume being injected during the valley and hence, T∝s. In Fig. 6 we have plotted the hierarchi- cal valley size distribution Nall(χ), for six simulations between low and high Cawith M= 1 and 100 on a lattice of 40 ×60 and 25×35 nodes, respectively. Nall(χ) was cal- culated by including all valley sizes and the hierarchical smaller ones within a large val- ley (see Fig. 5). To obtain reliable average quantities we did 10 to 20 different simula- tions at each Ca. In order to calculate the 91 2 3 4 5 log10 χ−6−4−20log10 [Nall(χ)/Nall(10)]Ca=1.6×10−5 Ca=1.9×10−4 Ca=1.6×10−3 Ca=3.1×10−4 Ca=3.1×10−3 Ca=2.1×10−2 Figure 6: The hierarchical valley size distri- butions Nall(χ), for six simulations between low and high CawithM= 1 (◦,,⋄) and M= 100 ( △,⊳,▽). The slope of the solid line is−1.9. valley sizes at large Ca, we subtract the av- erage drift in the pressure signal due to vis- cous forces such that the pressure becomes a function that fluctuates around some mean pressure. By assuming a power law Nall(χ)∝χ−τall our best estimate from Fig. 6 is τall= 1.9± 0.1, indicated by the slope of the solid line. At low χin Fig. 6, typically only one tube is invaded during the valley and we do not expect the power law to be valid. Similar results were obtained when calculating the hierarchical distribution of the time periods Tof the valleys, denoted as Nall(T). In invasion percolation (IP) the distribu- tion of burst sizes N(s), where sdenotes the burst size, is found to obey the scaling relation [27,28,39,40] N(s)∝s−τ′g(sσ(f0−fc)).(11)Herefcis the percolation threshold of the system and g(x) is some scaling function, which decays exponentially when x≫1 and is a constant when x→0.τ′is re- lated to percolation exponents like τ′= 1 +Df/D−1/(Dν) [40], where DfandD is the fractal dimension of the front and the mass of the percolation cluster, respectively. νis the correlation length exponent in per- colation theory and σ= 1/(νD) [41]. In Eq. (11) a burst is defined as the connected structure of sites that is invaded following one root site of random number f0, along the invasion front. All sites in the burst have random numbers smaller than f0, and the burst stops when the random number of the next site to be invaded is larger than f0[42]. By integrating Eq. (11) over all f0in the interval [0 , fc]Maslov [43] deduced a scal- ing relation for the hierarchical burst size distribution Nall(s) following Nall(s)∝s−τall, (12) where τall= 2. In the low Caregime in Fig. 6, the dis- placements are in the capillary dominated regime and the invading fluid generates a growing cluster similar to IP [4, 7–9]. In this regime we also have that χ∝s[28] and hence Nall(χ) corresponds to Nall(s) in Eq. (12). Thus, in the low Caregime we ex- pect that Nall(χ) follows a power law with exponent τall= 2 which is confirmed by our numerical results. Similar results were ob- tained in Ref. [28]. The evidence in Fig. 6, that τalldoes not seem to depend on Ca, is very interesting. At high Cawhen M= 0.01 an unstable vis- cous fingering structure generates and when 10M≥1 a stable front develops. It is an open question how these displacement processes map to the proposed scaling in Eq. (12). We note that in the high Caregime the relation χ∝smay not be correct and Tis preferred when computing Nall. However, the simu- lations show that Nall(χ)∼Nall(T) even at highCa. In Ref. [43] τallwas pointed out to be super universal for a broad class of self- organized critical models including IP. The result in Fig. 6 indicates that the simulated displacements might belong to the same su- per universality class even at high injection rates where there is no clear mapping be- tween the displacement process and IP. Basak et al. [44,45] performed four drain- age experiments where they used a 110 ×180 mm transparent porous model consisting of a mono-layer of randomly placed glass beads of 1 mm, sandwiched between two Plexiglas plates. The experimental setup was similar to the one used in Ref. [27]. The model was initially filled with a water- glycerol mixture of viscosity 0.17 P. The water-glycerol mixture was withdrawn from one of the short side of the system at con- stant rate by letting air enter the system from the other short side. The pressure in the water-glycerol mixture on the with- drawn side was measured with a pressure sensor of our own construction. From the recorded pressure signal we cal- culated the hierarchical distribution of time periods of the valleys, Nall(T). At low Ca this corresponds to Nall(s) in Eq. (12). Be- cause of the relative long response time of the pressure sensor, rapid and small pres- sure jumps due to small bursts are presum- ably smeared out by the sensor and the recorded pressure jumps are only reliable−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log10 [T/<T>]−6−4−202log10 [Nall(T)/<Nall(T)>] Ca=3.3×10−6 Ca=1.3×10−5 Ca=3.3×10−5 Ca=6.6×10−5 Ca=1.1×10−4 Ca=2.2×10−4 Ca=4.3×10−4 Ca=1.7×10−3 Figure 7: The hierarchical distribution Nall(T) of the valley time Tduring a burst for experiments (open symbols) and simu- lations (filled symbols) at various Cawith M= 0.017 and M= 0.01, respectively. The slope of the solid line is −1.9. for larger bursts. Hence, from the recorded pressure signal Tappears to be a better es- timate of the burst sizes than χ. In Fig. 7 we have plotted the logarithm ofNall(T) for experiments (open symbols) and simulations (filled symbols) performed at four different Ca, respectively. To col- lapse the data Nall(T) and Twere nor- malized by their means. In the simula- tions M= 0.01 while in the experiments M= 0.017 where we have assumed air to have viscosity 0 .29×10−2P. We observe that the experimental result is consistent with our simulations and we conclude that Nall(T)∝T1.9±0.1. This confirms the scal- ing of Nall(χ) in Fig. 6. From Figs. 6 and 7 we conclude that τall= 1.9±0.1 for all displacement sim- ulations going from low to high injection 11rates when M= 0.01, 1, and 100. This is also confirmed by drainage experiments performed at various injection rates with M= 0.017. The evidence that τallis in- dependent of the injection rate, may indi- cate that the displacement process belongs to the same super universality class as the self-organized critical models in Ref. [43] (τall= 2), even where there is no clear map- ping between the displacement process and IP. 4 STABILIZATION MECHANISMS OF THE FRONT When the displacements are oriented out of the horizontal plane and the injection rate is low, gravity acting on the system, may sta- bilize the front due to density differences be- tween the fluids. Several authors [30,46–48] have confirmed, by experiments and sim- ulations, that the saturated front width wsscales with the strength of gravity like ws∝Bo−ν/(1+ν). Here Bo(Bond number) is the ratio between gravitational and capil- lary forces, given by Bo= ∆ρga2/γ, where ∆ρis the density difference between the flu- ids,gthe acceleration due to gravity, athe average pore size, and γthe fluid-fluid in- terface tension. Furthermore, νdenotes the correlation length exponent in percolation. A similar consensus concerning the sta- bilization mechanisms when the displace- ments are oriented within the horizontal plane, has not yet been reached. In hori- zontal displacements, viscous forces replace gravitational forces, and in the literature there exist different suggestions about thescaling of wsas function of Ca. The capil- lary number Cais the ratio between viscous and capillary forces according to the defi- nition in Eq. (6). In 3D, where trapping of wetting fluid is assumed to be of little importance, Wilkinson [30] was the first to use percolation to deduce a power law like ws∝Ca−αwhere α=ν/(1 +t−β+ν). Heretandβis the conductivity and order parameter exponent in percolation, respec- tively. Later, Blunt et al. [32] suggested in 3D that α=ν/(1 +t+ν). This is identi- cal to the result of Lenormand [31] finding a power law as function of system size for the domain boundary in the Ca–Mplane between capillary fingering and stable dis- placement in 2D porous media. More recently, Xuet al. [33] used the ar- guments of Gouyet et al. [49] and Wilkin- son[30] to show that the pressure drop ∆Pnwover a length ∆ hin the nonwetting phase of the front should scale as ∆ Pnw∝ ∆ht/ν+DE−1−β/ν(see Fig. 8). Here DEde- notes the Euclidean dimension of the space in which the front is embedded, i.e. in our caseDE= 2. The pressure drop in the wet- ting phase ∆ Pw, was argued to be linearly dependent on ∆ hdue to the compact phase there (Fig. 8). In Ref. [32] Blunt et al. also suggested a scaling relation for ∆ Pnw, how- ever, in 3D they found ∆ Pnw∝∆ht/ν+1. This is different from the result of Xuet al. when DE= 3. In the next section, Sec. 4.1, we present an alternative view on the displacement process from those initiated by Wilkin- son[30], but include the evidence that non- wetting fluid flows in separate strands (see Fig. 9). The alternative view leads to an- other scaling of ∆ Pnwthan the one Xuet al. [33] would predict in 2D, and we show 12∆h∆PwFrontOutlet Inlet∆PB wetting non- wettingAnw Figure 8: A schematic picture of the front that travels across the system from the in- let to the outlet. ∆ Pnwand ∆ Pwdenote the viscous pressure drop going from AtoBin the nonwetting and wetting phase, respec- tively. AandBare separated a distance ∆halong the short side of the system. that it may influence αin the scaling be- tween wsandCa. The new scaling of ∆ Pnw is supported by numerical experiments us- ing the network model. 4.1 LOOPLESS STRANDS Figure 9 shows two typical displacement structures that were obtained from simu- lations at low and high Caon a lattice of 40×60 nodes with M= 1. From the fig- ure we observe that the nonwetting fluid (dark grey and black) generates patterns containing no closed loops. That means, following a path of nonwetting fluid will never bring us back to the starting point. The nonwetting fluid also flows in separate loopless strands, indicated as black tubes in Fig. 9. The loopless structures in Fig. 9 are a direct consequence of the evidence that Figure 9: Two displacement structures of simulations at high Ca= 3.9×10−4(top) and low Ca= 1.6×10−5(bottom) before breakthrough of nonwetting fluid. The lat- tice size is 40 ×60 nodes and M= 1. The nonwetting fluid (dark grey and black) is injected from below and wetting fluid (light grey) flows out along the top row. The black tubes denote the loopless strands where nonwetting fluid flows and the dark grey tubes indicate nonwetting fluid unable to flow (i.e. dead ends) due to trapped re- gions of wetting fluid. Note the few fluid supplying strands from the inlet to the frontal region at low Cacompared to the case at high Ca. 13a tube filled with wetting fluid and sur- rounded on both sides by nonwetting fluid is trapped due to volume conservation of wet- ting fluid [50]. We note that this evidence may easily be generalized to 3D, and there- fore our arguments should apply there too. We also note that trapping of wetting fluid is more difficult in real porous media due to a more complex topology of pores and throats there. Loopless IP patterns have earlier been observed in Refs. [51–53]. From Fig. 9 we may separate the dis- placement patterns into two parts. One consisting of the frontal region continuously covering new tubes, and the other consist- ing of the more static structure behind the front. The frontal region is supplied by nonwetting fluid through a set of strands that connect the frontal region to the inlet. When the strands approach the frontal re- gion they are more likely to split. Since we are dealing with a square lattice, a splitting strand may create either two or three new strands. As the strands proceed upwards in Fig. 9, they split repeatedly until the frontal region is completely covered by nonwetting strands. On IP patterns without loops [51,53,54] the length lof the minimum path between two points separated an Euclidean distance Rscales like l∝RDswhere Dsis the frac- tal dimension of the shortest path. We as- sume that the displacement pattern of the frontal region for length less than the cor- relation length (in our case ws) is statis- tically equal to IP patterns in Ref. [51]. Therefore, the length of a strand in the frontal region is proportional to ∆ hDswhen ∆his less than ws. If we assume that on the average every tube in the lattice has same mobility ( kij/µij), this causes the fluidpressure within a single strand to drop like ∆hDsas long as the strand does not split. When the strand splits volume conserva- tion causes the volume fluxes through the new strands to be less than the flux in the strand before it splits. Hence, following a path where strands split will cause the pres- sure to drop as ∆ hκwhere κ≤Ds. From Fig. 9, we note that at high Cathe lengths of individual strands in the frontal region approach the minimum length due to the tubes. Therefore, in this limit finite size ef- fects are expected to cause Ds→1. From the above arguments we conclude that the pressure drop ∆ Pnw, in the nonwet- ting phase of the frontal region (that is the strands) should scale as ∆ Pnw∝∆hκwhere κ≤Ds. In 2D two different values for Dshave been reported: Ds= 1.22 [53,54] for loopless IP with and without trapping and growing around a central seed, and Ds= 1.14 [51] for the single strand con- necting the inlet to the outlet when non- wetting fluid percolates the system. In 2D the result of Xuet al. [33] would give κ=t/ν+DE−1−β/ν≈1.9 where we have inserted t= 1.3,ν= 4/3,β= 5/36, andDE= 2. This result for κis larger thanDsand therefore not compatible with our arguments. To confirm numerically that κ≤Ds, we have calculated the difference in cap- illary pressure ∆ Pcbetween menisci along the front by using our network model. ∆ Pc as function of ∆ his calculated by taking the mean of the capillary pressure differ- ences between all pairs of menisci along the front, separated a distance ∆ hin the direc- tion of the displacement. ∆ Pcof a pair of menisci is calculated by taking the capillary pressure of the meniscus closest to the inlet 140 10 20 30 ∆h (in units of tube length)02004006008001000∆Pc (dyn/cm2) Ca=1.5×10−3, M=100 Ca=3.7×10−4, M=100 Ca=1.6×10−5, M=1 Figure 10: ∆ Pcas function of ∆ hfor three different Ca’s with M= 100 and 1 on lat- tices of 25 ×35 and 40 ×60 nodes, respec- tively. minus the capillary pressure of the meniscus closest to the outlet. Figure 10 shows ∆ Pcas function of ∆ h for simulations performed at high, interme- diate and low Ca, with M= 1 or 100. The simulations with M= 100 were performed on a 25 ×35 nodes lattice with µnw= 10 P,µw= 0.10 P, and γ= 30 dyn/cm. The disorder was introduced by choosing the tube radii at random in the interval 0.05d≤rij≤d. The tube length was d= 0.1 cm. The simulations with M= 1 were performed on a distorted lattice of 40×60 nodes where 0 .02 cm≤dij≤0.18 cm and rij=dij/2αwithα= 1.25. Here µnw=µw= 0.5 P. We did 10–30 simu- lations at each Cato obtain reliable aver- age quantities. From the plot we observe that ∆ Pcincreases roughly linearly as func- tion of ∆ h. The simulations also show that ∆Pc≃∆Pnw−∆Pwand that ∆ Pwdependslinearly on ∆ hdue to the compact wetting phase there (see Fig. 8). Hence our sim- ulations give that ∆ Pnw∼∆Pc∝∆hκ where κ≃1.0. This supports the argu- ments giving κ≤Ds, and we conclude that earlier proposed theories [30–33] which do not consider the evidence that nonwetting fluid flows in strands, are incompatible with drainage when strands are important. To save computation time and thereby be able to study ∆ Pcon larger lattices in the lowCaregime, we have generated bond in- vasion percolation (IP) patterns with trap- ping on lattices of 200 ×300 nodes. The bonds in the IP lattice correspond to the tubes in the network model. The occupa- tion of bonds started at the bottom row, and the next bond to be occupied was always the bond with the lowest random number ffrom the set of empty bonds along the invasion front. We applied a small gra- dient in the random numbers of the bonds to stabilize the front [30,47]. When the IP patterns became well de- veloped with trapped (wetting) clusters of sizes between the bond length and the front width, the tubes in our network model were filled with nonwetting and wetting fluid ac- cording to occupied and empty bonds in the IP lattice. Furthermore, the radii r of the tubes were mapped properly to the random numbers fof the bonds by first re- moving the gradient in fand then assigning r= 1−f[36]. The last transformation is necessary because in the IP algorithm the next bond to be invaded is the one with the lowest random number, opposite to the net- work model, where the widest tube will be invaded first. Having initialized the tube network, the network model was started and the simu- 15lations were run a limited number of time steps while recording ∆ Pc. The number of time steps where chosen sufficiently large to let the menisci along the front adjust according to the viscous pressure set up by the injection rate. By this method we save the computation time that would have been required if the displacement patterns should have been generated by the network model instead of the much faster IP algo- rithm. However, to make this method self- consistent we have to assume that the IP patterns are statistically equal to the corre- sponding structures that would have been generated by the network model. Totally, we generated four IP patterns with different sets of random numbers and every pattern was loaded into the network model. The result of the calculated ∆ Pc versus ∆ his shown in Fig. 11 for Ca= 9.5×10−5andM= 100. If we assume a power law ∆ Pc∝∆hκ, we find κ= 1.0±0.1. The slope of the straight line in Fig. 11 is 1.0. We have also calculated ∆ Pc forCa= 2×10−6withM= 1 and M= 100 by using one of the generated IP patterns. The result of those simulations is consistent with Fig. 11 which indeed show the similar behavior as the results in Fig. 10. An important issue, arising at low Ca, is the effect of bursts on the capillary pres- sure. A burst occurs when a meniscus along the front becomes unstable and nonwetting fluid abruptly covers new tubes [28]. The tube where the burst initiates will during the burst, experiences a much higher fluid transport relative to tubes far away. De- scribing the pressure behavior between the tube of the burst and the rest of the front is nontrivial. However, simulations show that even during bursts, we find that ∆ Pcin-0 1 2 3 log10(∆h)00.511.522.5log10(∆Pc) Figure 11: The logarithm of ∆ Pcas func- tion of the logarithm of ∆ hfor simulations initiated on IP patterns at Ca= 9.5×10−5 andM= 100. The slope of the solid line is 1.0. creases linearly with ∆ h. The evidence that κ≃1.0 may influence the exponent αinws∝Ca−α. Assum- ing Darcy flow where the pressure drop de- pends linearly on the injection rate, we con- jecture that ∆/hatwidePc∝Ca∆hκ. Here ∆/hatwidePcde- notes the capillary pressure difference over a height ∆ hwhen the front is stationary. That means, ∆/hatwidePcexcludes situations where nonwetting fluid rapidly invades new tubes due to local instabilities (i.e. bursts). The above conjecture is supported by simula- tions showing that in the low Caregime ∆/hatwidePc∝Ca∆hκwhere κ≃1.0. Note, that ∆/hatwidePc∝negationslash≃∆Pcin Fig. 10 since the latter in- cludes both stable situations and bursts. At sufficiently low Cawhere only the strength of the capillary pressure decides which tube should be invaded or not, we may map the displacement process to per- 16colation giving ∆/hatwidePc∝f−fc∝ξ−1/ν[30,47, 49]. Here fis the random numbers in the percolation lattice, fcis the critical percola- tion threshold, and ξ∝wsis the correlation length. Combining the above relations for ∆/hatwidePcgivesws∝Ca−αwhere α=ν/(1+νκ). In 2D ν= 4/3 and by inserting κ= 1.0 we obtain α≈0.57. Note that this is differ- ent to results suggested in Refs. [30,32,33] giving α≈0.37–0.38 in 2D. At high Cathe nonwetting fluid is found to invade simultaneously everywhere along the front, and consequently the front never reaches a stationary state [36]. In this limit simulations show a nonlinear dependency between ∆/hatwidePcandCa. Therefore, in the high Caregime it is not clear if the above map- ping to percolation is valid, and we expect another type of relation between wsandCa. 4.2 COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTS Frette et al. [55] have performed two- phase drainage experiments in a 2D porous medium with viscosity matched fluids (M= 1). They reported on the stabi- lization of the front and measured the sat- urated front width ws, as function of Ca. Their best estimate on the exponent in ws∝Ca−αwasα= 0.6±0.2. This is consistent with the above conjecture ( α= 0.57), however, corresponding simulations on 40×60 nodes lattices give α= 0.3±0.1. Figure 12 contains the data of Frette et al. (filled circles) and the result of our simulations (open diamonds). The simu- lations are performed at Ca≥1.0×10−5 while most of the experiments where done atCa≤1.0×10−5. Since the range of the−7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 log10(Ca)00.511.52log10(ws)Experiments Simulations Figure 12: log10(ws) as function of log10(Ca) for experiments from [55] and simulations on the lattice of 40 ×60 nodes. In both experiments and simulations M= 1. The slope of the solid and dashed line is -0.6 and -0.3, respectively. two does not overlap it is difficult to com- pare the result of the simulations with those of the experiments. However, the change inαfrom 0.6 to 0.3, might be consistent with a crossover to another behavior at high Caaccording to the discussion in Sec. 4.1. We also note, that in the simulations at Ca≃1.0×10−5, the front width approaches the maximum width due to the system size, making it difficult to observe any possible α≈0.57 regime at low Ca. We emphasize that more simulations on larger systems and at lower Caare needed before any conclu- sion on αcan be drawn. 4.3 DISCUSSION The evidence that the nonwetting fluid dis- places the wetting fluid in a set of loopless 17strands opens new questions about the dis- placement process. Returning to Fig. 9 it is striking to observe the different patterns of strands at high and low Ca. At low Ca few strands are supplying the frontal region with nonwetting fluid, and the strands split many times before the whole front is cov- ered. At high Cathe horizontal distance between each strand in the static structure is much shorter, and only a few splits are required to cover the front. We conjecture that the average horizontal distance be- tween the fluid supplying strands depends on the front width. However, further inves- tigation of the displacement patterns is re- quired before any conclusions can be drawn. So far the arguments in Sec. 4.1 only con- sider displacements where the nonwetting strands contain no loops. A very interesting question that has to be answered is: What happens to κwhen different strands in the front connect to generate loops. In ordinary bond or site percolation loops generally oc- cur. Loops are also observed in experiments corresponding to those of Frette et al. [55]. In the experiments it is more difficult to trap wetting fluid due to the more complex topology of pores and throats (see Fig. 1). Consequently, loops will more easily gen- erate there, than in the case of a regular square lattice. Loops might also be created when neighboring menisci along the front overlap and coalesce depending on the wet- ting properties of the nonwetting fluid [5,6]. As a first approximation we conjecture that creation of loops will not cause κto change significantly. Note that in the front the different nonwetting strands connecting to each other to create loops, must at some later time split. Otherwise successive con- nections will cause the different strands tocoalesce into one single strand of nonwet- ting fluid. Moreover, after the front width has saturated, the number of places where different strands connect must on average be balanced by the number of places where strands split. Therefore, we believe that the influence on κdue to connections (i.e. loops) will be compensated by the splits and the overall behavior of κwill remain the same. We emphasize that further simula- tions and experiments are required to in- vestigate the effect of loops on κ. According to the discussion in Sec. 4.3, the evidence that the displacement patterns consist of loopless strands may easily be generalized to 3D. Therefore our arguments giving κ≤Ds, might be valid in 3D as well. Note also that in 3D it is less proba- ble that different strands meet. Hence, even if they were supposed to connect to create loops, the number of created loops are ex- pected to be few. In 3D the fractal dimen- sion of the shortest path for loopless IP is Ds= 1.42 [53]. 5 CONCLUSION We conclude that our 2D network model properly simulates the temporal evolution of the pressure in the fluids during drainage. We have seen that capillary forces situ- ated around isolated and trapped regions of wetting fluid, contribute to the total pres- sure across the lattice, as well as the capil- lary fluctuations due invasion of nonwetting fluid along the front. We have found that the model reproduces the typical burst dynamics at low injection rates and we have investigated the statis- tics of the bursts by calculating the hierar- 18chical valley size distribution Nall(χ). We conclude that Nall(χ) follows a power law, Nall(χ)∝χ−τallwhere τall= 1.9±0.1 is independent of the injection rate and vis- cosity ratio. Similar result is obtained from experiments. At low injection rates the result is consistent with the prediction in Ref. [43] ( τall= 2), which was deduced for a broad spectrum of different self-organized critical models including IP. The evidence thatτallis independent of the injection rate, may indicate that the displacement pro- cess belongs to the same super universality class as the self-organized critical models in Ref. [43], even where there is no clear map- ping between the displacement process and IP. We have also simulated the behavior of the capillary pressure along the front. Sim- ulations show that the capillary pressure difference ∆ Pcbetween two points along the front varies almost linearly as function of distance ∆ hin the direction of the dis- placement. The numerical result supports arguments based on the observation that nonwetting fluid flows in separate strands where wetting fluid is displaced. From the arguments we find that ∆ Pc∝∆hκwhere κ≤Ds. Here Dsdenotes the fractal dimen- sion of the nonwetting strands. Several attempts have been made to describe the stabilization mechanisms in drainage due to viscous forces, however, none of them consider the evidence that nonwetting fluid displaces wetting fluid through strands. Therefore, we conclude that earlier suggested theories fail to de- scribe the stabilization of the invasion front when strands dominate the displacements.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS E. Aker and A. Hansen wish to thank the Niels Bohr Institute and the Nordic Insti- tute for Theoretical Physics for their hospi- tality. The work has received support from the Norwegian Research Council through a “SUP” program and from the Niels Bohr Institute. REFERENCES [1] J.-D. Chen and D. Wilkinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1892 (1985). [2] K. J. M˚ aløy, J. Feder, and T. Jøssang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2688 (1985). [3] R. Lenormand, E. Touboul, and C. Zarcone, J. Fluid Mech. 189, 165 (1988). [4] R. Lenormand and C. Zarcone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2226 (1985). [5] M. Cieplak and M. O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2042 (1988). [6] M. Cieplak and M. O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. B. 41, 11508 (1990). [7] P. G. de Gennes and E. Guyon, J. Mec. (Paris) 17, 403 (1978). [8] R. Chandler, J. Koplik, K. Lerman, and J. F. Willemsen, J. Fluid Mech. 119, 249 (1982). [9] D. Wilkinson and J. F. Willemsen, J. Phys. A 16, 3365 (1983). [10] I. Fatt, Petroleum Trans. AIME 207, 144 (1956). 19[11] J. Koplik and T. J. Lasseter, SPE Journal 22, 89 (1985). [12] M. M. Dias and A. C. Payatakes, J. Fluid Mech. 164, 305 (1986). [13] P. R. King, J. Phys. A 20, L529 (1987). [14] M. Blunt and P. King, Phys. Rev. A 42, 4780 (1990). [15] M. Blunt and P. King, Transp. Porous Media 6, 407 (1991). [16] P. C. Reeves and M. A. Celia, Water Resour. Res. 32, 2345 (1996). [17] G. N. Constantinides and A. C. Pay- atakes, AIChE Journal 42, 369 (1996). [18] E. W. Pereira, W. V. Pinczewski, D. Y. C. Chan, L. Paterson, and P. E. Øren, Transp. Porous Media 24, 167 (1996). [19] D. H. Fenwick and M. J. Blunt. In proc. of the SPE Annual Tech. Conf., SPE 38881 , San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A., Oct. 1997. [20] P. E. Øren, S. Bakke, and O. J. Arntzen. In proc. of the SPE Annual Tech. Conf., SPE 38880 , San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A., Oct. 1997. [21] S. C. van der Marck, T. Matsuura, and J. Glas, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5675 (1997). [22] D. H. Fenwick and M. J. Blunt, Adv. Water Res. 21, 121 (1998). [23] H. K. Dahle and M. A. Celia, Comp. Geosci. 3, 1 (1999).[24] L. Paterson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1621 (1984). [25] T. A. Witten and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981). [26] K. J. M˚ aløy, F. Boger, J. Feder, and T. Jøssang, Phys. Rev. A 36, 318 (1987). [27] K. J. M˚ aløy, L. Furuberg, J. Feder, and T. Jøssang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2161 (1992). [28] L. Furuberg, K. J. M˚ aløy, and J. Feder, Phys. Rev. E 53, 966 (1996). [29] W. B. Haines, J. Agric. Sci. 20, 97 (1930). [30] D. Wilkinson, Phys. Rev. A 34, 1380 (1986). [31] R. Lenormand, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 423, 159 (1989). [32] M. Blunt, M. J. King, and H. Scher, Phys. Rev. A 46, 7680 (1992). [33] B. Xu, Y. C. Yortsos, and D. Salin, Phys. Rev. E 57, 739 (1998). [34] E. Aker, K. J. M˚ aløy, A. Hansen, and G. G. Batrouni, Transp. Porous Media 32, 163 (1998). [35] E. Aker, K. J. M˚ aløy, and A. Hansen, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2217 (1998). [36] E. Aker, K. J. M˚ aløy, and A. Hansen, Phys. Rer. E 61, 2936 (2000). [37] E. W. Washburn, Phys. Rev. 17, 273 (1921). 20[38] G. G. Batrouni and A. Hansen, J. Stat. Phys.52, 747 (1988). [39] B. Sapoval, M. Rosso, and J. F. Gouyet. In Fractals’ Physical Ori- gin and Properties , edited by L. Pietronero, Plenum Press, New York, 1989. [40] N. Martys, M. O. Robbins, and M. Cieplak, Phys. Rev. B. 44, 12294 (1991). [41] D. Stauffer and A. Aharony. Introduc- tion to Percolation Theory . Taylor & Francis, London, 1992. [42] S. Roux and E. Guyon, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, 3693 (1989). [43] S. Maslov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 562 (1995). [44] S. Basak and K. J. M˚ aløy. Unpub- lished, 1996. [45] E. Aker, K. J. M˚ aløy, A. Hansen, and S. Basak. Burst dynamics dur- ing drainage displacements in porous media: Simulations and experiments. Accepted in Euro. Phys. Lett. , 2000. [46] D. Wilkinson, Phys. Rev. A 30, 520 (1984). [47] A. Birovljev, L. Furuberg, J. Feder, T. Jøssang, K. J. M˚ aløy, and A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 584 (1991). [48] P. Meakin, A. Birovljev, V. Frette, J. Feder, T. Jøssang, K. J. M˚ aløy, and A. Aharony, Physica A 191, 227 (1992). [49] J.-F. Gouyet, M. Rosso, and B. Sapo- val,Phys. Rev. B 37, 1832 (1988).[50] E. Aker, K. J. M˚ aløy, and A. Hansen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4589 (2000). [51] M. Sahimi, M. Hashemi, and J. Ghas- semzadeh, Physica A 260, 231 (1998). [52] H. Kharabaf and Y. C. Yortsos, Phys. Rev. E 55, 7177 (1997). [53] M. Cieplak, A. Maritan, and J. R. Banavar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3754 (1996). [54] M. Porto, S. Havlin, S. Schwarzer, and A. Bunde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4060 (1997). [55] O. I. Frette, K. J. M˚ aløy, J. Schmit- tbuhl, and A. Hansen, Phys. Rev. E. 55, 2969 (1997). 21

arXiv:physics/0005055v1 [physics.class-ph] 22 May 2000Experiments on the generation of long wavelength edge radiation along directions nearly coincident with the axis of a straight section of the ”Pakhra” synchrotron V.I.Alexeev, E.G.Bessonov Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Scienc es, Moscow, Russia Abstract Generation of long wavelength edge radiation along directi ons nearly coincident with the axes of straight sections of storage rings and synchrotrons is disc ussed. The removal of destructive interference from the superimposed edge radiation patterns of a straight section on the synchrotron ”Pakhra” has been observed experimentally. 1 Introduction The concept of long wavelength radiation was introduced in c lassical electrodynamics for the case of a particle emitting radiation in external fields. The spectra l-angular distribution of the long wavelength electromagnetic energy emitted by the particle doesn’t ten d to zero when the frequency of the emitted radiation tends to zero [1, 2]. The electromagnetic wave com ponents of long wavelength radiation have mainly one sign. The Fourier transform of their electric fiel d strength /vectorEω|ω=0/negationslash= 0 [3] - [6]. The object of this paper is to discuss the problem of generati on of radiation with properties near to the long wavelength radiation by a particle or particle beams in external electromagnetic fields of synchrotrons and storage rings. Some experimental results carried out in the beginning of 1980 will be presented. 2 Selected questions of the classical electrodynamics The electric and magnetic field strengths of a non-uniformly moving charged particle are determined by /vectorE(t) =/vectorEc(t) +/vectorEr(t),/vectorH= [/vector n/vectorE], (1) where /vectorEc(t) =e(1−β2)(/vector n−/vectorβ) R2(1−/vector n/vectorβ)3|t′, /vectorEr(t) =e[/vector n[(/vector n−/vectorβ)˙/vectorβ]] cR(1−/vector n/vectorβ)3|t′, e, c/vectorβand c˙/vectorβare the charge, velocity, and acceleration of the particle; /vector n, the unit vector directed from a particle to the observation point, and R, the distance from the particle to the observation point [1] ,[2]. The values /vectorβ,˙/vectorβ,/vector nandRare to be evaluated at an earlier (retarded) moment t′=t−R(t′)/c. The terms /vectorEc(t),/vectorHc(t) in Eq1 describe the sharply decreasing ( ∼1/R2) Coulomb field of the particle, while /vectorEr(t) and/vectorHr(t) are for the free electromagnetic field radiated by the parti cle (∼1/R). Usually the observation point is assumed to be far away from t he region of particle acceleration, the unit vector /vector nis sensibly constant in time [1, 2]. The region of particle ac celeration and emission is assumed to have finite dimensions, and the radiation is observed from distances much larger than dimensions of the emission region (in the far-zone or wave zone). The particle emits radiation within a finite time interval determined by initial and final moments ti,tfof particle acceleration. The energy of the emitted radiati on is finite. The properties of the emitted radiation are defined by the Fou rier transform /vectorEr ωof the electric field strength vector /vectorEr(t) of the form/vectorErω=1 2π/integraldisplay+∞ −∞/vectorEr(t)eiωtdt. (2) For instance, the spectral-angular distribution of the ene rgy radiated by a particle into the solid angle do=dS/R2 oor onto the area dSat the observation point is determined by ∂2ε ∂ω∂o=R2 o∂2ε ∂ω∂S=cR2 o|/vectorEr ω|2. (3) According to Eq2 the properties of the emitted radiation are determined by the total trajectory of the particle where the particle acceleration differs from zero. This assertion is in accordance with the Fourier transform of Eq2 for the time interval ( −∞,+∞) or for the real case ( ti, tf) [6]. Notice that the Coulomb fields have longitudinal component a nd|/vectorHc| /negationslash=|/vectorEc|(|/vectorHr|=|/vectorEr|). These are the reasons why the Fourier transform of the Coulomb and t otal electric and magnetic fields in near zone could not be introduced and interpreted in a simple way. Only in the ultrarelativistic case, where |/vectorHc| → |/vectorEc|, the Fourier transform of the Coulomb field is interpreted as the superposition of the equivalent elementary waves corresponding to virtual quan ta in the Weizsacker-Williams method. But this is the approximate method used only for the case of homog eneously moving particles in empty space. It describes well the bremsstrahlung radiation of electron s in the fields of relativistic ions [2]. In other cases the accuracy of this method is not high. For example, wh en the relativistic particle crosses a plane mirror it emits the transition radiation. We can say that in t his case the properties of the transition radiation are defined by the properties of equivalent photon s ”reflected” from the mirror. However, the properties of the transition radiation are calculated prec isely and they differ from those calculated by the method of equivalent photons. For instance, in the case of a p erfect mirror the transition radiation fields are included in the spherical layer of the thickness d→0 (the layer contains the emitted radiation of wavelengths λ≫d). They are emitted from one point or from a very small region [ 2] (equivalent photons would be reflected by the total surface of the mirror), and hav e a similar spectrum [7]. In some cases, the total fields (distorted Coulomb and radiat ion fields) of a particle must be taken into account, e.g. a distortion of scattered particles fields can change the ionizing properties of the particles [3]. At the same time, the inclusion of the Coulomb fields in th e Fourier transform in some papers [8], [9], [10] is not motivated and does not change essentially proper ties of the emitted radiation [11]. Of course, the account of retarded Coulomb near-fields of high current b eams in the storage rings [12], [13], [14], [15] and in undulators of free-electron lasers [6], [16] is neces sary to obtain the correct particle trajectories and to calculate the total losses of the particle energy thro ugh coherent radiation [6]. The Fourier transform of the electric field strength at zero f requency can be presented in the form /vectorEr ω|ω=0= (1/2π)/vectorIr, where /vectorIr=/integraltext+∞ −∞/vectorEr(t)dtis the strange parameter of the wave. Waves with this parameter /vectorIr/negationslash= 0 were named strange waves. Strange waves have components o f the electric field strength mainly of one sign. In particular, single-sign waves are the strange waves [3]. Strange waves transfer to a charged particle a momentum in th e direction transverse to the wave propagation. This property of strange waves contradicts to the common opinion that light pressure is directed only in the direction of light propagation. The que stion appears:”Do the strange waves exist? Is it possible to generate them?” The answer is not trivial. When they say the word ”radiation” it usually means free elec tromagnetic waves described by a homogeneous wave equation. The solution of this equation ca n be the arbitrary function of argument ( /vector n/vectorR− ct) [1, 2]. The word ”arbitrary” means that single-sign waves ( strange waves) satisfy the homogeneous wave equation in particular case. However, the existence of such solutions is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for the existence of strange waves. What is the suffi cient condition? To answer the question we must solve the nonhomogeneous wave equation. In the case of one particle the solution of the nonhomogeneou s wave equation is described by the Lienard-Wiechert fields of Eq1. Integration of the electric field strength /vectorEr(t) determined by Eq1 leads to the strange parameter of the free field emitted by the parti cle /vectorIr=e cRo[/vector n[/vector n(/vectorβ2 1−/vector n/vectorβ2−/vectorβ1 1−/vector n/vectorβ1)]], (4) where subscripts 1 ,2 relate to initial and final electron velocities [3].According to the Eq4 strange waves can be emitted only in the c ase when the initial and/or final velocities of the particle are not equal to zero and hence the particle trajectories are not limited. Unac- ceptable conditions for particle trajectories exist for la boratory sources of strange waves as according to these conditions the dimensions of such sources must be infin itely large. It is possible to emit strange waves in cosmos but impossible to emit them in installations of finite dimensions similar to lasers or synchrotron radiation sources [3]. 3 On the laboratory sources of the long wavelength radiation based on the storage rings and accelerators At present the high brilliance and high intensity broadband sources of both incoherent and coherent infrared radiation are absent. The long wavelength part of t he synchrotron and edge radiation [3] - [6] emitted in the infrared region by particle beams in storage r ings is increasingly used in different fields of science as an alternative for laboratory sources such as a me rcury lamp or glowbar [17], [10]. Broadband free-electron lasers of the coherent infrared radiation ar e developing [18], [19], [20]. The efficiency of emission of the synchrotron radiation in the long wavelength region in storage rings and synchrotrons is increased when the value of the magnetic field strength of their bending magnets is decreased. Usually the value of the magnetic field strengt h of bending magnets of storage rings is high. That is why we can use special bending magnets installe d in the straight sections of storage rings. The value of their magnetic field strengths have an optimum de fined by the equation e/integraltext Hdl≃2mc2 corresponding to the bending angle of the particle in this ma gnets≃2/γ, where the value 2 mc2/e≃3·103 Gs·cm and γis the relativistic factor of the particle. First experimen ts confirmed this statement [21]. The radiation from special bending magnets in such cases int erferes with the edge radiation. As it turned out, at optimal conditions of generation the magnetic field i ntroduced in the straight section must be directed opposite to the guiding magnetic field of the storag e ring. In the general case, the system of bending magnets installed in the straight sections of the st orage rings can produce both linear and circular polarized broadband radiation in the long wavelength regio n [4]. In the case of pure edge radiation (special bending magnets i n the straight section of the storage ring are absent) the components of the electric field strength of e ach of the two wavepackets emitted in the edge fields of the storage ring at the angle ∼1/γto the direction of the axis of the storage ring have mainly one sign. But signs of wavepacket components are opposite. I t means that every of the wavepackets represents the strange wave radiation. Its spectrum does no t tend to zero when ω→0. However the sum of the wavepackets is not the strange radiation because of th e destructive interference. The lengths of the wavepackets in this case are much less than the distance b etween them. The picture of the process in space is similar to the case of an instant start and instant fin ish of a particle at the edges of the storage ring. The edge radiation can be named ”conventionally stran ge” or ”quasiundulator” radiation [4] - [6]1. The spectral-angular distribution of the edge radiation em itted in the long wavelength region λ > d/ 2γ2 and under the condition when the observation point is locali zed at infinity (condition when we can neglect the difference between distances from edges of the synchrotr on to the observation point) can be presented in the form ∂2ε ∂ω∂o=4e2 π2cϑ2 (1 +ϑ2)2sin2ω ωl, (5) where leffis the effective length of the straight section of the storage ring,l−leff|H≫Hd≃2dln(H/H d); l, the geometrical length of the straight section, d, the gap of the bending magnet of the storage ring, H, the value of the magnetic field of the bending magnet of the sto rage ring, Hd=mc2/ed;m, the electron mass, ϑ=γθ,ωl= 4γ2c/leff(1 +ϑ2), and θ, the angle between the axis of the straight section and the direction from the synchrotron edge to the observation poin t localized at infinity. The effective length leffand the frequency ωldepend slightly on energy [4]. Spectrum of the edge radiation is shifted to the long wavelen gth region. In this case the spectral- angular distribution of the radiation emitted at θ∼1/γis higher than that of the synchrotron radiation 1When the difference between the distances from the edges to th e observation points are of the order of the effective length of the straight section of the storage ring then the strange p arameter Ir=|/vectorIr| /negationslash= 0 if we neglect boundary conditions. However the windows of synchrotrons and mirrors of finite dimensions do not permit to transfer this radiation to the observation p oint [3].(for the same synchrotron) [7]. According to Eq5 the main part of the edge radiation energy is emitted throughout the angles ϑ∼1. At frequencies ω > ω lthe spectrum oscillates with the period ωland at frequencies ω < ω lit tends to zero when the frequency tends to zero, which indicates that t he wavepackets have opposite signs. This is the so-called destructive interference of the wavepackets of the opposite signs first discussed in the case of transition radiation2[22]. 4 Experimental arrangement The experiments on generation of the long wavelength edge ra diation were done on the weak-focusing race-track electron synchrotron ”Pakhra”. The maximum ene rgy of the synchrotron εmax= 1200 MeV, the radius of the orbit of electrons in the bending magnets of the synchrotron r= 4m, the geometric length of a straight section of the synchrotron l= 1.9m. The frequency of the guiding magnetic field of the synchrotron Ω /2π= 50 Hz. The experimental setup of the ”Pakhra” synchrotron used in t he recent experiment [23], [24] is similar to that presented in [25]. The scheme of the experiment is sho wn in Fig.1, where l,leff, the geometrical and effective lengths of the synchrotron straight section, R1andR2the distances from edges of the synchrotron straight section to the observation point, θ1,θ2the angles between the directions of the axis of the synchrotron straight section and vectors directed fr om edges of storage rings to the observation point. The energy of electrons in the synchrotron was changed by the lawεe=ε=+ε∼cos(Ωt), where the constant and alternating components of the energy ε=≃ε∼. The electron energy changed from minimal εmin=ε=−ε∼to a maximal εmax=ε=+ε∼. The maximal energy of the electrons in this experiment was chosen 850 MeV ( γ≃1700). The scheme of selection of the wavepacket emitted from one ed ge of the synchrotron by a lens having the focusing distance fand located at the distance Lfrom the right edge is shown in Fig.2. In two of produced experiments, leff≃1.25 m and L= 1.875 m. The lens was installed at the window of the synchrotron, photographic plate in the first experiment and photomultiplier in the second were installed at distance ∆ R= 1.5 m from the lens. Filters at the wavelengths λ= 8400 ˚Aandλ= 3850 ˚Aand lenses with focusing distances f= 1 m and f= 1.85 m were used in the first and the second experiments. The observation point in our experiments was localized at th e distances R1= 4.625 m and R2= 3.375 m. The difference R1−R2=leff= 1.25 m was about 3 times less than R1andR2and could therefor be neglected in the experiments without the lens. In fact it cou ld be taken into account by introducing in Eq4 unit vectors /vector n1/vector n2and distances R1,R2corresponding to the edges of the bending magnets of the synchrotron [3]. The effect of using of the lens is the higher t he higher the difference between R1,R2and leff. 5 Discussion According to Eq4, the condition β1=β2= 0 for the electron trajectories in the synchrotron, and the definition presented in the Introduction, the radiation emitted in the synchrotron is not the long wavelength one. The radiation emitted from the central part of the bending magnet of the synchrotron in the direction near to the direction of the electron velocity is a usual synchrotron radiation. In the direction of the corresponding observation point this radiation is em itted mainly from the part of the trajectory of the length ∼lc= 2R/γ. The edge radiation is emitted from the adjoining edge regio ns of fringing fields of bending magnets. In this case the components of the e lectric field strength of the electromagnetic waves emitted in the directions defined by the angles θ∼1/γare the two short ( ls≪leff/γ2) single-sign wavepackets separated by the distance ∼leff/γ2. Spectrum of the edge radiation determined by Eq5 is shifted to the long wavelength region, as compared to synchr otron radiation spectrum. If we could select the radiation emitted in one bending magne t from the radiation emitted in another one then we could shift the emitted radiation in a longer wave length region. And this is not the question of the strange waves generation but the question of the spect rum shift3. 2The transition radiation emitted in the case of unlimited pe rfect plane mirror is the strange wave radiation. 3To reflect strange waves we need in perfect plane mirror of infi nitely large dimensions. The mirror of finite dimensions can reflect radiation up to the wavelength λ∼awhere a is the dimensions of the mirror. The window permit to t ransfer theIn the first experiment the lens was not installed. No interfe rence fringes were observed at a pho- tographic plate similar to those observed in [22, 26] since t he picture was averaged over time (energy). When the lens was installed then the radiation emitted from t he left edge was focused onto a small area at the left side of the picture. The picture of the radiation foc used by the lens is presented in Fig.3. Similar picture was observed at the distance ∆ R= 2.3 m from the lens where the radiation emitted from the right edge of the synchrotron was focused onto a small area. S o the radiation emitted in the region of one edge of the synchrotron can be focused and hence selected by d iaphragms from the radiation emitted in the region of another edge. We did not observe any contributi on of radiation emitted from central part of the straight section of the storage ring and defined by the C oulomb term of Eq1. In the second experiment, the time dependence of the intensi ty of the emitted radiation was measured by a photomultiplier and recorded by the oscillograph. This dependence is shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The signal of Fig.4 corresponds to the case where the radiati on is not focused by lens. In accordance with the theory (see Eq5) the interference of the wavepacket s emitted from edge regions of the synchrotron leads to the energy dependence of the frequency ωland intensity of the emitted radiation on energy and, hence, time. This observation is confirmed by Fig.4. The sign al measured by the photomultiplier and recorded by the oscillograph oscillates in time. In Fig.5, the signal is caused by the radiation which is focus ed by a lens. We can see again that the lens destroys the interference and selects the radiation emitte d from the region of one edge of the synchrotron. Selection of the radiation emitted in one edge of the bending magnet of the synchrotron permits one to hope that the radiation emitted at the angles θ∼1/γto the axis of the synchrotron will be shifted to the longer wavelength region. It is impossible to focus the radiation at all frequencies by a glass or silicon lens. Metal concave mirror can be used in optical, IR and submillimeter regions. Dimens ions of windows of synchrotrons and storage rings and dimensions of mirrors restrict the spectrum from t he long wavelength region. 6 Conclusion For the first time, to our knowledge, the removal of the destru ctive interference in the edge radiation has been demonstrated here experimentally. We can hope that the spectrum of the radiation emitted in the angular region θ∼1/γto the axis of the straight section of the synchrotron was shi fted to the more longer wavelength region. This conclusion must be verified. References [1] Landau, L. D., and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 3rd Reversed English edition, Pergamon, Oxford and Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1971 ). [2] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, John Wiley &. Sons, 1975. [3] E.G.Bessonov, Sov. Phys. JETP 53 (3), 1981, p.433. [4] E.G.Bessonov, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., 1983, v. 28 (7), p. 837. [5] a) E.G.Bessonov, Nucl. Instr. Meth., 1991, v. A308, p. 13 5; p. 142, b) E.G.Bessonov, Proc. 15th Int. Ac- cel. Conf. on High Energy Accelerators, v.1, Hamburg, Germa ny, 1992, p. 503; p.501, c) E.G.Bessonov, M.L.Vnukova, Quantum Electronics, v.25 (12), p.1214, 1995 (English version of Kvantovaya Electronica (in Russian), v.22 (12), 1251 (1995). [6] E.G.Bessonov, Proc. Lebedev Phys. Inst. of the RAS, ser. 214 (Undulator Radiation, Free-Electron Lasers), Ed. N.G.Basov, Nauka, 1993, p.3. [7] E.G.Bessonov, Yu.Shibata, Preprint FIAN No 35, 1996; ph ysics/9708023. [8] A.A.Sokolov, D.V.Gal’tsov, M.M.Kolesnikova, Izvesti a VUZov, No 4, 1971, p.14. [9] Y.Hirai, A.Luccio, L.Yu, J. Appl. Phys. v.55, p.25 (1984 ). [10] Y.-L.Mathis, P.Roy, B.Tremblay, et al., Phys. Rev. Let t., 1998, v.80, No 6, p. 1220. [11] M.Castellano, N.Cavallo, F.Cevenini, et al., Il Nuovo Cimento, v. 81 B, No 1, p. 67, 1984. radiation shorter then the diameter of the window [3].[12] L.V.Iogansen, M.S.Rabinovich, Sov. Phys. JETP, v.37 ( 10), 1960, p.83. [13] J.B.Murphy, S.Krinsky, R.L.Glukstern, Proc. of IEEE P AC 1995, Dallas, (1995). [14] V.N.Melechin, Zhurnal Experim. and Teor. Phys., v.97, No 3 (1990), p.757. [15] B.E.Carlsten, Phys. Rev. E, v.54, No 1, (1996), p.838. [16] E.L.Saldin, E.A.Schneidmiller, M.V.Yurkov, Nucl. In str. Meth., A417, No 4 (1998), p.158. [17] E.Schweizer, J.Nagel, W.Braun et al., Nucl. Instr. Met h., v.A239 (1985), p. 630. [18] J.B.Murphy, S.Krinsky, Nucl. Instr. Meth., v.A346 (19 94), p.571. [19] Hung-chi Lihn, P.Kung, C.Settakorn, H.Wideman, Phys. Rev. Lett., v.76, No 22 (1996), p.4163. [20] Yu.Shibata, K.Ishi, S.Ono, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., v. 78, No 14 (1997), p.2740; Nucl. Instr. Meth., v.B145 (1998), p.49. [21] Z.L.Artem’eva, E.G.Bessonov, K.N.Shorin, A.S.Yarov , Soviet Physics - Lebedev Institutes reports, No 1, 1981, p. 28. [22] L.Wartsky, S.Roland, J.Lasalle, et al., J. Appl. Phys. , v.46, No 8 (1975), p.3644. [23] V.I.Alexeev, E.G.Bessonov, A.V.Kalinin, V.A.Krasik ov, Preprint FIAN No 228, Moscow, 1981. [24] V.I.Alexeev, Ph. D. thesis, Moscow, Lebedev Phys. Inst . RAS, 1989. [25] D.F.Alferov, Yu.A.Bashmakov, K.A.Belovintsev, E.G. Bessonov, P.A.Cherenkov, Phys. - JETP Lett., 1977, v.26, No 7, p. 385. [26] M.M.Nikitin, A.F.Medvedev, M.V.Moiseev, Sov. Phys. J ETP, v.52, 388, (1980). Presented to the Proc. Int. Symposium ”Radiation of relativ istic electrons in periodical structures”, Sept.13-16, 1999, Lake Baikal, Russia (will be published in Nucl. Instr. Meth.).Figure 1: The scheme of the experimental setup. Figure 2: The scheme of selection of the wavepackets emitted from the right edge of the synchrotron. Figure 3: The picture of the radiation emitted in the directi on of straight section of the synchrotron and focused by a lens.Figure 4: Time dependence of the intensity of light emitted i n the direction of the axis of straight section of the synchrotron. Focusing lens is absen t. Figure 5: Time dependence of the intensity of light emitted i n the direction of the axis of straight section of the synchrotron. Focusing lens is insta lled.

arXiv:physics/0005056 22 May 20001 /G3B/G5A/G79/G64 /G03 /G42 /G11 /G3C /G11 /G48/G03/G5D/G5F/G68/G66/G5F/G6C/G6A/G62/G62 /G03/G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G5F/G67/G67/G68/G5D/G68/G03/G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G6C/G68/G6A/G5A /G4A/G5F/G61/G78/G66/G5F /G1D /G49/G6A/G5F/G5E/G6B/G6C/G5A/G5C/G65/G5F/G67/G5A /G03 /G62/G5E/G5F/G79 /G03 /G6D/G69/G6A/G5A/G5C/G65/G79/G5F/G66/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G6C/G68/G6A/G5A /G0F/G03 /G69/G6A/G5F/G5E/G67/G5A/G61/G67/G5A/G71/G5F/G67/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G5E/G65/G79 /G79/G5E/G5F/G6A/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G6B/G62/G67/G6C/G5F/G61/G5A /G0F/G03 /G68/G6B/G6D/G73/G5F/G6B/G6C/G5C/G65/G79/G5F/G66/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G5C/G5F/G6A/G72/G62/G67/G5F /G03 /G64/G68/G67/G6D/G6B/G5A /G0F/G03 /G68/G5B/G6A/G5A/G61/G68/G5C/G5A/G67/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G5C/G62/G6F/G6A/G5F/G5C/G75/G66 /G03 /G69/G68/G6C/G68/G64/G68/G66 /G03 /G67/G62/G61/G64/G68/G6C/G5F/G66/G69/G5F/G6A/G5A/G6C/G6D/G6A/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G11 /G48/G5B/G75/G71/G67/G68 /G03 /G5E/G65/G79 /G03 /G5D/G6A/G6D/G5B/G68/G63 /G03 /G68/G70/G5F/G67/G64/G62 /G03 /G6C/G5F/G66/G69/G5F/G6A/G5A/G6C/G6D/G6A/G75 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G79/G5E/G5F/G6A/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G6B/G62/G67/G6C/G5F/G61/G5A /G03 /G62/G6B/G69/G68/G65/G76/G61/G6D/G78/G6C /G69/G6A/G62/G5B/G65/G62/G61/G62/G6C/G5F/G65/G76/G67/G68/G5F /G03 /G6A/G5A/G5C/G5F/G67/G6B/G6C/G5C/G68 /G03 /G50/G59 /G50/G59 /G3D/G3D/G48 /G55/G14/G15 /G15/G15 /G14 /G15/G15 /G15 /G15+ ≅ /G0F/G03 /G5D/G5E/G5F /G03 /G59 /G03 /G10/G03 /G6B/G6A/G5F/G5E/G67/G5F/G64/G5C/G5A/G5E/G6A/G5A/G6C/G62/G71/G67/G5A/G79 /G6C/G5F/G69/G65/G68/G5C/G5A/G79 /G03 /G6B/G64/G68/G6A/G68/G6B/G6C/G76 /G03 /G62/G68/G67/G68/G5C /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G1E/G03 /G50/G50/G14 /G15/G0F /G03 /G10/G03 /G66/G5A/G6B/G6B/G75 /G03 /G62/G68/G67/G68/G5C /G1E/G03 /G3D/G48/G3D/G48/G14 /G15/G0F /G10/G03 /G77/G65/G5F/G64/G6C/G6A/G62/G71/G5F/G6B/G64/G62/G5F /G61/G5A/G6A/G79/G5E/G75 /G03 /G5C/G61/G5A/G62/G66/G68/G5E/G5F/G63/G6B/G6C/G5C/G6D/G78/G73/G62/G6F /G03 /G71/G5A/G6B/G6C/G62/G70 /G0F/G03 /G55 /G6B/G66≅−/G14/G13/G14/G14/G0F/G03 /G68/G6C/G64/G6D/G5E/G5A /G03 /G6B/G65/G5F/G5E/G6D/G5F/G6C /G0F/G03 /G71/G6C/G68 /G03 ΤΚ≅/G14/G13/G1B/G11/G03 /G49/G6A/G62 /G77/G6C/G68/G66 /G03 /G69/G68/G67/G79/G6C/G67/G68 /G0F/G03 /G71/G6C/G68 /G03 /G69/G6A/G62/G5C/G5F/G5E/G5F/G67/G67/G5A/G79 /G03 /G6E/G68/G6A/G66/G6D/G65/G5A /G03 /G67/G5F /G03 /G79/G5C/G65/G79/G5F/G6C/G6B/G79 /G03 /G5C/G75/G6A/G5A/G60/G5F/G67/G62/G5F/G66 /G03 /G61/G5A/G64/G68/G67/G5A /G03 /G6B/G68/G6F/G6A/G5A/G67/G5F/G67/G62/G79 /G77/G67/G5F/G6A/G5D/G62/G62 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G71/G62/G6B/G6C/G68/G66 /G03 /G5C/G62/G5E/G5F /G0F/G03 /G6C /G11 /G64 /G11/G03 /G79/G5E/G5F/G6A/G67/G68/G5F /G03 /G5C/G61/G5A/G62/G66/G68/G5E/G5F/G63/G6B/G6C/G5C/G62/G5F /G03 /G61/G5A/G5E/G5A/G5F/G6C/G6B/G79 /G03 /G6E/G5F/G67/G68/G66/G5F/G67/G68/G65/G68/G5D/G62/G71/G5F/G6B/G64/G68/G63 /G5C/G5F/G65/G62/G71/G62/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G55 /G0F/G03 /G5A /G03 /G5D/G6A/G5A/G5C/G62/G6C/G5A/G70/G62/G68/G67/G67/G5A/G79 /G03 /G64/G68/G66/G69/G68/G67/G5F/G67/G6C/G5A /G03 /G77/G67/G5F/G6A/G5D/G62/G62 /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G6B/G6C/G68 /G03 /G67/G5F /G03 /G5C/G64/G65/G78/G71/G5A/G5F/G6C/G6B/G79 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G6A/G5A/G5C/G5F/G67/G6B/G6C/G5C/G68 /G5C/G5C/G62/G5E/G6D /G03 /G5F/G5F /G03 /G66/G5A/G65/G68/G6B/G6C/G62 /G03 /G68/G6C/G67/G68/G6B/G62/G6C/G5F/G65/G76/G67/G68 /G03 /G64/G6D/G65/G68/G67/G68/G5C/G6B/G64/G68/G63 /G03 /G6B/G68/G6B/G6C/G5A/G5C/G65/G79/G78/G73/G5F/G63 /G11/G03 /G4B /G03 /G5E/G6A/G6D/G5D/G68/G63 /G03 /G6B/G6C/G68/G6A/G68/G67/G75 /G0F /G6B/G68/G5D/G65/G5A/G6B/G67/G68 /G03 /G69/G6A/G62/G67/G70/G62/G69/G6D /G03 /G77/G64/G5C/G62/G5C/G5A/G65/G5F/G67/G6C/G67/G68/G6B/G6C/G62 /G03 /G57/G63/G67/G72/G6C/G5F/G63/G67/G5A /G03 /G62/G6B/G6C/G62/G67/G67/G68/G5F /G03 /G6C/G79/G5D/G68/G6C/G5F/G67/G62/G5F /G03 /G77/G64/G5C/G62/G5C/G5A/G65/G5F/G67/G6C/G67/G68 /G77/G6E/G6E/G5F/G64/G6C/G62/G5C/G67/G68/G66/G6D /G03 /G62/G67/G5F/G6A/G70/G62/G68/G67/G67/G68/G66/G6D /G03 /G6C/G79/G5D/G68/G6C/G5F/G67/G62/G78 /G0F/G03 /G5C/G5F/G65/G62/G71/G62/G67/G5A /G03 /G64/G68/G6C/G68/G6A/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G69/G6A/G5F/G5E/G68/G69/G6A/G5F/G5E/G5F/G65/G79/G5F/G6C/G6B/G79 /G6D/G6B/G65/G68/G5C/G62/G79/G66/G62 /G03 /G77/G64/G6B/G69/G5F/G6A/G62/G66/G5F/G67/G6C/G5A /G0F/G03 /G69/G68/G77/G6C/G68/G66/G6D /G03 /G6C/G5F/G69/G65/G68/G5C/G5A/G79 /G03 /G64/G62/G67/G5F/G6C/G62/G71/G5F/G6B/G64/G5A/G79 /G03 /G77/G67/G5F/G6A/G5D/G62/G79 /G03 /G5E/G68/G65/G60/G67/G5A /G03 /G5B/G75/G6C/G76 /G5E/G68/G69/G68/G65/G67/G5F/G67/G5A /G03 /G6B/G68/G6B/G6C/G5A/G5C/G65/G79/G78/G73/G5F/G63 /G03 /G77/G6E/G6E/G5F/G64/G6C/G62/G5C/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G5D/G6A/G5A/G5C/G62/G6C/G5A/G70/G62/G62 /G11/G03 /G4C/G68/G5D/G5E/G5A /G03 /G6B /G03 /G6D/G71/G5F/G6C/G68/G66 /G03 /G5E/G5A/G67/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G6E/G5A/G64/G6C/G68/G6A/G5A /G70/G5F/G65/G5F/G6B/G68/G68/G5B/G6A/G5A/G61/G67/G68 /G03 /G6A/G5A/G6B/G6B/G66/G5A/G6C/G6A/G62/G5C/G5A/G6C/G76 /G03 /G5B/G68/G65/G5F/G5F /G03 /G5D/G62/G5B/G64/G68/G5F /G03 /G0B /G5C /G03 /G6B/G66/G75/G6B/G65/G5F /G03 /G5C/G5A/G6A/G62/G5A/G5B/G5F/G65/G76/G67/G68/G6B/G6C/G62 /G03 /G6D/G6B/G65/G68/G5C/G62/G63 /G77/G64/G6B/G69/G5F/G6A/G62/G66/G5F/G67/G6C/G5A /G0C/G03 /G5C/G75/G6A/G5A/G60/G5F/G67/G62/G5F /G03 /G50/G59 /G50/G59/G35 /G35/G48 /G55/G15 /G15 /G15 /G13/G15 /G14 /G15/G15/G15 +  ≅ /G0F/G03 /G5D/G5E/G5F /G03 /G50 /G50 /G50/G14 /G15==; /G3D/G3D/G14 /G15/G14==; /G59/G13 /G03 /G10/G03 /G5A/G5B/G6B/G68/G65/G78/G6C/G67/G5A/G79 /G03 /G5C/G5F/G65/G62/G71/G62/G67/G5A /G03 /G67/G5A/G71/G5A/G65/G76/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G65/G62/G67/G5F/G63/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G6B/G64/G68/G6A/G68/G6B/G6C/G62 /G03 /G5C/G6A/G5A/G73/G5F/G67/G62/G79 /G1E/G35/G35/G14 /G15/G0F - /G6B/G68/G68/G6C/G5C/G5F/G6C/G6B/G6C/G5C/G5F/G67/G67/G68 /G03 /G67/G5A/G71/G5A/G65/G76/G67/G75/G63 /G03 /G62 /G03 /G64/G68/G67/G5F/G71/G67/G75/G63 /G03 /G6A/G5A/G5E/G62/G6D/G6B /G03 /G5C/G6A/G5A/G73/G5F/G67/G62/G79 /G03 /G79/G5E/G6A/G5A /G11/G03 /G49/G6A/G62 /G03 /G77/G6C/G68/G66 /G03 /G67/G5A/G5E/G68 /G69/G68/G67/G62/G66/G5A/G6C/G76 /G0F/G03 /G71/G6C/G68 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G77/G67/G5F/G6A/G5D/G5F/G6C/G62/G71/G5F/G6B/G64/G62/G63 /G03 /G5B/G5A/G65/G5A/G67/G6B /G03 /G5C/G64/G65/G78/G71/G5F/G67/G5A /G03 /G69/G6B/G5F/G5C/G5E/G68 /G10 /G5D/G6A/G5A/G5C/G62/G6C/G5A/G70/G62/G68/G67/G67/G5A/G79 /G03 /G64/G68/G66/G69/G68/G67/G5F/G67/G6C/G5A /G0F /G62/G67/G5A/G71/G5F /G03 /G5D/G68/G5C/G68/G6A/G79 /G0F/G03 /G61/G5E/G5F/G6B/G76 /G03 /G6D/G71/G62/G6C/G75/G5C/G5A/G5F/G6C/G6B/G79 /G03 /G67/G5F /G03 /G5C/G61/G5A/G62/G66/G68/G5E/G5F/G63/G6B/G6C/G5C/G62/G5F /G0F/G03 /G5C/G75/G61/G5C/G5A/G67/G67/G68/G5F /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G6B/G6C/G6A/G5A/G67/G6B/G6C/G5C/G5F/G67/G67/G75/G66 /G6B/G5B/G65/G62/G60/G5F/G67/G62/G5F/G66 /G03 /G79/G5E/G5F/G6A /G0F/G03 /G5A /G03 /G62/G6B/G64/G6A/G62/G5C/G65/G5F/G67/G62/G5F /G03 /G6B/G5A/G66/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G6B/G6C/G6A/G5A/G67/G6B/G6C/G5C/G5A /G0F/G03 /G6C /G11 /G5F /G11/G03 /G5C/G68/G61/G66/G6D/G73/G5F/G67/G62/G5F /G03 /G5C/G5A/G64/G6D/G6D/G66/G5A /G03 /G5C/G5B/G65/G62/G61/G62 /G79/G5E/G6A/G5A /G11 /G4C/G5A/G64/G62/G66 /G03 /G68/G5B/G6A/G5A/G61/G68/G66 /G0F/G03 /G6B/G6D/G73/G5F/G6B/G6C/G5C/G6D/G5F/G6C /G03 /G6F/G68/G6A/G68/G72/G62/G63 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G61/G5F/G6A/G5C /G03 /G5E/G65/G79 /G03 /G69/G68/G67/G62/G60/G5F/G67/G62/G79 /G03 /G6C/G5F/G66/G69/G5F/G6A/G5A/G6C/G6D/G6A/G75 /G6C/G5F/G6A/G66/G68/G79/G5E/G5F/G6A/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G70/G62/G62 /G0F/G03 /G64/G68/G6C/G68/G6A/G75/G66 /G03 /G66/G75 /G03 /G67/G5F /G03 /G69/G6A/G5F/G66/G62/G67/G5F/G66 /G03 /G5C/G68/G6B/G69/G68/G65/G76/G61/G68/G5C/G5A/G6C/G76/G6B/G79 /G03 /G69/G6A/G62 /G64/G68/G67/G6B/G6C/G6A/G6D/G62/G6A/G68/G5C/G5A/G67/G62/G62 /G03 /G62/G5D/G6A/G6D/G72/G5F/G71/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G6C/G68/G6A/G5A /G0F/G03 /G6C /G11 /G5F /G11/G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G6C/G68/G6A/G5A /G0F/G03 /G67/G5A/G6F/G68/G5E/G79/G73/G5F/G5D/G68/G6B/G79 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G69/G5F/G6A/G5C/G68/G66 /G69/G6A/G62/G5B/G65/G62/G60/G5F/G67/G62/G62 /G03 /G64 /G03 /G5E/G5F/G63/G6B/G6C/G5C/G6D/G78/G73/G5F/G66/G6D /G11/G03 /G3C /G03 /G6B/G68/G68/G6C/G5C/G5F/G6C/G6B/G6C/G5C/G62/G62 /G03 /G6B /G03 /G5E/G5A/G67/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G64/G68/G67/G70/G5F/G69/G70/G62/G5F/G63 /G03 /G69/G6A/G5F/G5E/G65/G5A/G5D/G5A/G5F/G6C/G6B/G79 /G6B/G6F/G5F/G66/G5A /G0F/G03 /G69/G6A/G62/G67/G70/G62/G69 /G03 /G6A/G5A/G5B/G68/G6C/G75 /G03 /G64/G68/G6C/G68/G6A/G68/G63 /G03 /G61/G5A/G64/G65/G78/G71/G5A/G5F/G6C/G6B/G79 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G6E/G68/G6A/G66/G62/G6A/G68/G5C/G5A/G67/G62/G62 /G03 /G5C/G6A/G5A/G73/G5A/G78/G73/G5F/G5D/G68/G6B/G79 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G5F/G67/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G69/G68/G6C/G68/G64/G5A /G03 /G6B /G03 /G5D/G5F/G68/G66/G5F/G6C/G6A/G62/G5F/G63 /G03 /G64/G68/G67/G6D/G6B/G68/G68/G5B/G6A/G5A/G61/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G6C/G68/G6A/G5A /G0F/G03 /G5A/G64/G6C/G62/G5C/G62/G61/G62/G6A/G6D/G78/G73/G5F/G5D/G68 /G6B/G5A/G66/G68/G69/G68/G5E/G5E/G5F/G6A/G60/G62/G5C/G5A/G78/G73/G6D/G78/G6B/G79 /G03 /G6C/G5F/G6A/G66/G68/G79/G5E/G5F/G6A/G67/G6D/G78 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G70/G62/G78 /G0F/G03 /G6C /G11 /G5F /G11/G03 /G62/G66/G5F/G5F/G6C /G03 /G66/G5F/G6B/G6C/G68 /G03 /G69/G68/G6B/G65/G5F/G5E/G68/G5C/G5A/G6C/G5F/G65/G76/G67/G68/G6B/G6C/G76 /G69/G6A/G68/G70/G5F/G6B/G6B/G68/G5C /G1D 1) /G61/G5A/G60/G62/G5D/G5A/G67/G62/G5F /G03 /G6F/G68/G65/G68/G5E/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G5F/G67/G67/G68 /G10 /G6C/G68/G64/G68/G5C/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G72/G67/G6D/G6A/G5A /G03 /G69/G6D/G6B/G64/G68/G5C/G75/G66 /G03 /G6C/G6A/G5A/G67/G6B/G6E/G68/G6A/G66/G5A/G6C/G68/G6A/G68/G66 /G0F 2) /G61/G5A/G64/G6A/G6D/G6C/G64/G5A /G03 /G69/G68/G6C/G68/G64/G5A /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G03 /G6A/G5A/G5E/G62/G5A/G65/G76/G67/G75/G66 /G03 /G6D/G6B/G64/G68/G6A/G62/G6C/G5F/G65/G5F/G66 /G0F 3) /G62/G67/G62/G70/G62/G5A/G65/G62/G61/G5A/G70/G62/G79 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G79/G5E/G5F/G6A/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G6B/G62/G67/G6C/G5F/G61/G5A /G0F/G03 /G65/G68/G64/G5A/G65/G62/G61/G68/G5C/G5A/G67/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G68/G5B/G65/G5A/G6B/G6C/G62 /G03 /G66/G5A/G5D/G67/G62/G6C/G67/G68/G63 /G69/G6A/G68/G5B/G64/G62 /G03 /G62 /G03 /G6B/G68/G69/G6A/G68/G5C/G68/G60/G5E/G5A/G78/G73/G5F/G63/G6B/G79 /G03 /G67/G5A/G5D/G6A/G5F/G5C/G5A/G67/G62/G5F/G66 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G5F/G67/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G69/G68/G6C/G68/G64/G5A /G03 /G5C /G03 /G6D/G64/G5A/G61/G5A/G67/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G68/G5B/G65/G5A/G6B/G6C/G62 /G5C /G03 /G6A/G5F/G61/G6D/G65/G76/G6C/G5A/G6C/G5F /G03 /G62/G67/G6C/G5F/G67/G6B/G62/G6E/G62/G64/G5A/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G5F/G5F /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G6C/G5F/G64/G5A/G67/G62/G79 /G0F 4) /G5C/G64/G65/G78/G71/G5F/G67/G62/G5F /G03 /G6C/G5F/G6A/G66/G62/G71/G5F/G6B/G64/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G6C/G68/G64/G5A /G0F/G03 /G5C/G75/G61/G5C/G5A/G67/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G5D/G6A/G5A/G5E/G62/G5F/G67/G6C/G68/G66 /G03 /G6E/G6D/G67/G64/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G6C/G5F/G66/G69/G5F/G6A/G5A/G6C/G6D/G6A/G75 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G0F/G03 /G68/G69/G6A/G5F/G5E/G5F/G65/G5F/G67/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G67/G5A /G03 /G68/G6B/G62 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G5F/G67/G67/G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G69/G68/G6C/G68/G64/G5A /G03 /G69/G68 /G03 /G5C/G6B/G5F/G66/G6D /G03 /G69/G5F/G6A/G62/G66/G5F/G6C/G6A/G6D /G03 /G6A/G5A/G5B/G68/G71/G5F/G63 /G64/G5A/G66/G5F/G6A/G75 /G0F 5) /G68/G6C/G5C/G68/G5E /G03 /G6C/G5F/G69/G65/G5A /G03 /G62/G61 /G03 /G68/G5B/G65/G5A/G6B/G6C/G62 /G03 /G65/G68/G64/G5A/G65/G62/G61/G5A/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G5B/G68/G65/G5F/G5F /G03 /G6F/G68/G65/G68/G5E/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G67/G5A/G5D/G6A/G6D/G61/G64/G6D /G69/G68/G6C/G6A/G5F/G5B/G62/G6C/G5F/G65/G79 /G112 /G49/G6A/G62/G67/G70/G62/G69/G62/G5A/G65/G76/G67/G5A/G79 /G03 /G6B/G6F/G5F/G66/G5A /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G6C/G68/G6A/G5A /G64 /G65 /G78 /G71 /G61 /G5A/G60/G62 /G5D /G5A /G67 /G62 /G79/G64 /G68 /G67 /G5E /G5F /G67 /G6B /G5A /G6C /G68/G6A /G67 /G5A /G79 /G5B/G5A /G6C /G5A/G6A/G5F /G79/G69 /G6D /G6B /G64 /G68 /G5C /G68/G63 /G6C /G6A/G5A /G67 /G6B /G6E /G68 /G6A /G66 /G5A /G6C /G68 /G6A /G6A/G5A/G5B/G68 /G71 /G5A /G79 /G03 /G64 /G5A /G66/G5F /G6A/G5A /G03 /G6B /G64 /G5A /G6C /G6D/G72 /G64 /G68/G63 /G66 /G5A /G5D /G67 /G62 /G6C /G67 /G68 /G5D /G68 /G6D /G5E/G5F/G6A /G60 /G5A /G67 /G62 /G79 /G03 /G69 /G65 /G5A/G61 /G66 /G75/G6A/G5A/G5E/G62/G5A /G65 /G76 /G67 /G75/G63 /G69 /G65 /G5A /G61/G66/G5F /G67/G67 /G75 /G63 /G6D /G6B /G64 /G68/G6A/G62 /G6C /G5F /G65 /G76 /G0F/G03 /G6C /G11 /G5F /G11 /G61 /G5A /G66 /G64 /G67 /G6D /G6C /G5A /G79 /G03 /G70 /G5F /G69 /G76 /G6B /G68 /G65 /G5F /G67 /G68/G62/G5E /G68 /G5C /G03 /G6B /G6B /G5F/G6A/G5E /G5F /G71 /G67 /G62 /G64 /G5A /G66 /G62 /G0F /G67 /G5A/G69/G6A/G5A /G5C /G65 /G5F /G67/G67 /G75 /G66 /G62 /G03 /G64 /G70 /G5F /G67/G6C /G6A /G6D /G03 /G68 /G64 /G6A /G6D/G60 /G67 /G68 /G6B /G6C /G62 /G69/G68 /G65 /G6D /G69/G6A/G68 /G61 /G6A/G5A /G71 /G67 /G5A /G79 /G03 /G66 /G5A /G5D /G67 /G62 /G6C /G67 /G5A /G79 /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G5B /G64 /G5A /G03 /G6B /G64 /G6A/G6D /G71 /G5F /G67 /G62 /G5F/G66 /G0F/G03 /G6C /G11 /G5F /G11/G03 /G6C /G68/G6A/G68/G62/G5E/G5A /G65 /G76 /G67 /G5A /G79 /G03 /G66 /G5A/G5D /G67 /G62 /G6C /G67 /G5A /G79 /G64 /G5A /G6C /G6D/G72 /G64 /G5A /G03 /G6B /G03 /G69 /G5F /G6A /G5F/G64 /G6A /G5F/G73 /G62 /G5C /G5A /G78/G73 /G62 /G66 /G62 /G6B /G79 /G5C /G62 /G6C /G64 /G5A /G66 /G62 /G0F/G03 /G67 /G5A /G66 /G68 /G6C /G5A /G67 /G67 /G75 /G66 /G62 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G67 /G5A/G69/G6A/G5A /G5C /G65 /G5F /G67 /G62/G62 /G5B/G68 /G65 /G76/G72 /G68/G5D/G68 /G03 /G62 /G03 /G66 /G5A /G65 /G68 /G5D /G68 /G03 /G64 /G68 /G65 /G76/G70/G5A /G03 /G6C /G68/G6A/G68/G62/G5E/G5A /G47/G5F/G6B/G66/G68/G6C/G6A/G79 /G03 /G67/G5A /G03 /G5C/G67/G5F/G72/G67/G78/G78 /G03 /G6B/G6F/G68/G60/G5F/G6B/G6C/G76 /G03 /G66/G68/G5E/G5F/G65/G62 /G03 /G6B /G03 /G4C/G48/G44/G3A/G46/G3A/G44/G68/G66 /G0F/G03 /G69/G6A/G5F/G5E/G65/G5A/G5D/G5A/G5F/G66/G5A/G79 /G64/G68/G67/G70/G5F/G69/G70/G62/G79 /G03 /G62/G66/G5F/G5F/G6C /G03 /G6B/G5C/G68/G62 /G03 /G68/G6C/G65/G62/G71/G62/G6C/G5F/G65/G76/G67/G75/G5F /G03 /G68/G6B/G68/G5B/G5F/G67/G67/G68/G6B/G6C/G62 /G0F/G03 /G5A /G03 /G62/G66/G5F/G67/G67/G68 /G1D • /G5C/G5F/G6A/G68/G79/G6C/G67/G68/G6B/G6C/G76 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G6B/G62/G67/G6C/G5F/G61/G5A /G03 /G79/G5E/G5F/G6A /G03 /G5C/G68/G61/G6A/G5A/G6B/G6C/G5A/G5F/G6C /G03 /G67/G5F /G03 /G6C/G68/G65/G76/G64/G68 /G03 /G61/G5A /G03 /G6B/G71/G5F/G6C /G03 /G69/G68/G5C/G75/G72/G5F/G67/G62/G79 /G6C/G5F/G66/G69/G5F/G6A/G5A/G6C/G6D/G6A/G75 /G03 /G62 /G03 /G69/G65/G68/G6C/G67/G68/G6B/G6C/G62 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G0F/G03 /G67/G68 /G03 /G62 /G03 /G61/G5A /G03 /G6B/G71/G5F/G6C /G03 /G62/G61/G66/G5F/G67/G5F/G67/G62/G79 /G03 /G66/G68/G66/G5F/G67/G6C/G5A /G03 /G62/G67/G5F/G6A/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G79/G5E/G6A/G5A • /G6D/G6B/G6C/G68/G63/G71/G62/G5C/G68/G6B/G6C/G76 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G03 /G6B/G68/G68/G6C/G5C/G5F/G6C/G6B/G6C/G5C/G6D/G5F/G6C /G03 /G69/G6A/G62/G6A/G68/G5E/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G6B/G6C/G5A/G5B/G62/G65/G76/G67/G68/G6B/G6C/G62 /G03 /G5C/G62/G6F/G6A/G5F/G5C/G75/G6F /G03 /G69/G68/G6C/G68/G64/G68/G5C • /G67/G5F /G03 /G6B/G6D/G73/G5F/G6B/G6C/G5C/G6D/G5F/G6C /G03 /G68/G6B/G6C/G6A/G68/G63 /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G5B/G65/G5F/G66/G75 /G03 /G6D/G5E/G5F/G6A/G60/G5A/G67/G62/G79 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G0F/G03 /G69/G68/G6B/G64/G68/G65/G76/G64/G6D /G03 /G61/G5E/G5F/G6B/G76 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G71/G76 /G03 /G62/G5E/G5F/G6C /G03 /G68/G5B /G6D/G5E/G5F/G6A/G60/G5A/G67/G62/G62 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G68/G6B/G67/G68/G5C/G67/G68/G66 /G03 /G6F/G68/G65/G68/G5E/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 • /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G70/G62/G79 /G03 /G6B/G62/G67/G6C/G5F/G61/G5A /G03 /G65/G68/G64/G5A/G65/G62/G61/G68/G5C/G5A/G67/G5A • /G69/G68/G5E/G5E/G5F/G6A/G60/G64/G5A /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G68/G5B/G5F/G6B/G69/G5F/G71/G5F/G67/G5A /G03 /G5A/G5C/G6C/G68/G67/G68/G66/G67/G75/G66/G62 /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G70/G5F/G6B/G6B/G5A/G66/G62 • /G6D/G69/G6A/G5A/G5C/G65/G5F/G67/G62/G5F /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G70/G5F/G6B/G6B/G68/G66 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G70/G62/G62 /G03 /G62/G66/G5F/G5F/G6C /G03 /G5E/G68/G69/G68/G65/G67/G62/G6C/G5F/G65/G76/G67/G75/G5F /G03 /G6B/G68/G6B/G6C/G5A/G5C/G65/G79/G78/G73/G62/G5F /G42/G6C/G5A/G64 /G0F/G03 /G6F/G68/G6C/G79 /G03 /G67/G5A /G03 /G69/G5F/G6A/G5C/G75/G63 /G03 /G5C/G61/G5D/G65/G79/G5E /G0F/G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G5F/G64/G6C/G62/G6A/G6D/G5F/G66/G75/G63 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G6C/G68/G6A /G03 /G64/G5A/G64 /G03 /G5B/G6D/G5E/G6C/G68 /G03 /G5B/G75 /G03 /G5E/G68/G65/G60/G5F/G67 /G6A/G5A/G5B/G68/G6C/G5A/G6C/G76 /G03 /G0B /G5C/G68/G61/G66/G68/G60/G67/G68 /G0F/G03 /G5E/G5A/G60/G5F /G03 /G05 /G67/G5A/G5B/G65/G78/G5E/G5A/G65/G6B/G79 /G03 /G5C /G03 /G6A/G5A/G5B/G68/G6C/G5F /G05/G03 /G5C /G03 /G5C/G62/G5E/G5F /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G62/G61/G5C/G68/G65/G76/G67/G68 /G03 /G61/G5A/G6A/G68/G5E/G62/G5C/G72/G5F/G63/G6B/G79 /G72/G5A/G6A/G68/G5C/G68/G63 /G03 /G66/G68/G65/G67/G62/G62 /G0C/G0F/G03 /G67/G5F/G68/G5B/G6F/G68/G5E/G62/G66/G68 /G03 /G5C/G6B/G5F /G03 /G60/G5F /G03 /G5C/G75/G69/G68/G65/G67/G62/G6C/G76 /G03 /G67/G5F/G64/G68/G6C/G68/G6A/G75/G5F /G03 /G5E/G68/G6B/G6C/G6D/G69/G67/G75/G5F /G03 /G64 /G03 /G67/G5A/G6B/G6C/G68/G79/G73/G5F/G66/G6D /G66/G68/G66/G5F/G67/G6C/G6D /G03 /G68/G6A/G62/G5F/G67/G6C/G62/G6A/G68/G5C/G68/G71/G67/G75/G5F /G03 /G6A/G5A/G6B/G71/G5F/G6C/G75 /G0F/G03 /G69/G68/G61/G5C/G68/G65/G79/G78/G73/G62/G5F /G03 /G5C/G75/G5B/G6A/G5A/G6C/G76 /G03 /G68/G69/G6C/G62/G66/G5A/G65/G76/G67/G6D/G78 /G03 /G64/G68/G67/G6B/G6C/G6A/G6D/G64/G70/G62/G78 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G64/G6C/G68/G6A/G5A /G11/G03 /G3C/G66/G5F/G6B/G6C/G5F /G03 /G6B /G03 /G6C/G5F/G66 /G0F/G03 /G68/G6C/G6B/G6D/G6C/G6B/G6C/G5C/G62/G5F /G03 /G6A/G5A/G61/G5C/G62/G6C/G68/G63 /G03 /G6C/G5F/G68/G6A/G62/G62 /G03 /G69/G65/G5A/G61/G66/G75 /G03 /G67/G5F /G03 /G5E/G68/G65/G60/G67/G68 /G03 /G68/G6B/G6C/G5A/G67/G5A/G5C/G65/G62/G5C/G5A/G6C/G76 /G67/G5A/G6B /G03 /G69/G5F/G6A/G5F/G5E /G03 /G68/G69/G75/G6C/G67/G68/G63 /G03 /G6A/G5F/G5A/G65/G62/G61/G5A/G70/G62/G5F/G63 /G03 /G69/G6A/G68/G5F/G64/G6C/G5A /G11

arXiv:physics/0005057v1 [physics.atom-ph] 22 May 2000Accurate transition rates for the 5p – 5s transitions in Kr I Krzysztof Dzier˙ z֒ega,1,2Udo Volz,3Gillian Nave,1,4and Ulf Griesmann1,4 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersb urg, MD 20899–8421, U.S.A. 2Instytut Fizyki im.M.Smoluchowskiego, Uniwersytet Jagie llo´ nski, 30–059 Krak´ ow, Poland 3Fachbereich Physik, Universit¨ at Kaiserslautern, D–6765 3 Kaiserslautern, Germany 4Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. Branching fractions were measured for electric dipole tran sitions from the 5p upper levels to the 5s levels in neutral krypton atoms. The measurements were ma de with a wall-stabilized electric arc and a 2m monochromator for the spectral lines in the visib le, and with a hollow cathode lamp and the NIST 2m–Fourier transform spectrometer for the lines in the near infrared. A semi-empirical calculation, based on accurately known lif etimes for six upper levels, was used to calculate lifetimes for which accurate measurements do not exist. This resulted in a complete set of lifetimes for all 5p levels. Branching fractions and life times were used to calculate transition rates for the 5p–5s transitions. The relative uncertaintie s of the transition rates range from less than 1% for the strongest lines to about 10% for the weakest li nes. Our data also reveal that most of the previous measurements appear to have been affected by o pacity effects in the light sources. 32.70.Cs, 32.70.Fw 1 Introduction The transitions from the 5p levels to 5s levels in neutral Kr g ive rise to the most prominent lines in the Kr Iemission spectrum (see Fig. 1 for a simplified energy level di agram). Lifetimes with sub-percent uncertainties for six of the ten 5p levels have recently been measured with beam-gas laser spectroscopy (BGLS) by Schmoranzer and Volz [1] and Schmitt et al. [2]. We will show below how the six lifetimes from BGLS can be used in an intermediate coupling calculation to p redict accurately the lifetimes of those four levels that were not accessible to BGLS. The resulting compl ete set of lifetimes for the 5p levels inspired us to make new, accurate measurements of branching fraction s for all 5p–5s transitions in Kr Ito obtain electric dipole transition rates with uncertainties limit ed only by the accuracy of the radiometric calibration. To date, the most extensive measurements of transition rate s in Kr Iwere carried out by Chang, Horiguchi and Setser [3] who have measured transition rates for all 5p–5s transitions but with an accuracy of only 30%. Similar measurements were made by Fonseca and Camp os [4, 5] who used a low-pressure spectral lamp as an excitation source and lifetimes measured in an ele ctron excitation experiment for absolute measurements of transition rates. A number of other experim ents used thermal plasma sources, either wall- stabilized electric arcs in the experiments by Ernst and Sch ulz–Gulde [6] and Brandt, Helbig and Nick [7] or a shock-tube in the experiment by Kaschek, Ernst and B¨ ott icher [8]. These experiments depended on plasma diagnostics and the transition rates have relative u ncertainties that are generally not much better than±10% even for strong transitions. 12 Upper level lifetimes The lifetimes of six of the ten 5p upper levels are known with r elative standard uncertainties of the order of 0.2% or better from recent beam-gas-laser spectroscopy (BG LS) measurements by Schmitt et al. [2]. Our primary purpose here is to find reliable estimates for the lif etimes of the remaining four 5p levels. We will do this with a semi-empirical theoretical approach that is b ased upon intermediate coupling theory. In addition, we have evaluated the published experimental dat a to have an alternate set of lifetimes. Although these lifetimes are less accurate than the semi-empirical o nes they provide bounds for the semi-empirical lifetimes. 2.1 Experimental lifetimes A comparison with the six reference lifetimes from BGLS [2] d ivides the experimental data sets from litera- ture in two classes of different reliability. The results fro m experiments employing selective laser excitation [3, 13, 14] and from the only wall-stabilized arc emission ex periment [6] carried out so far generally fall (with a few explainable exceptions) into a ±8% tolerance band around the six reference lifetimes (see Ta ble 1). The pulsed-laser lifetime measurements encountered some p roblems for the closely-spaced levels 2p 8and 2p9due to fast collisional mixing that resulted in non-exponen tial decay curves. Apart from these two levels the results agree within ±8% with the BGLS lifetimes. A tendency towards underestimat ed error bars, however, is obvious for all three experiments. The lif etimes resulting from the arc emission experiment [6] also agree within ±8% with the BGLS results despite of an uncertainty of ±30% the authors quote for their absolute intensity scale. The exception here is the le vel 2p 9for which saturation problems were not adequately treated. These measurements (summarized in Table 1) are the best meas ured lifetimes for the remaining four 5p levels. The estimated relative uncertainties are ar ound ±8%. Other experiments which employed pulsed electron excitation [15, 16, 5] or the Hanle effect [17 , 18, 19, 20] all have produced at least one result far outside of the ±8% tolerance range and will therefore not be considered furt her. 2.2 Semi-empirical lifetimes The 5p levels in krypton decay exclusively (apart from some v ery weak far-IR channels for the four highest 5p levels) through the transitions of the 5p–5s array. In a typi cal semi-empirical calculation for this transition array (e.g. Lilly [21], see column CA in Table 2) the wavefunc tions of the initial and final configurations γ=4p55p and γ′=4p55s in intermediate coupling are expressed in terms of LS-cou pled wavefunctions |γLSJM > : |i,JM > =/summationdisplay LS|γLSJM > a (γLSJ,i ) (1) |f,J′M′>=/summationdisplay L′S′|γL′S′J′M′> a(γ′L′S′J′,f) (2) (iandfdenote the coupled initial and final states). The mixing co¨ e fficients a(γLSJ, ·) can be determined from experimental energies with a semi-empirical fit proced ure in the manner described by Lilly [21]. Once the mixing coefficients have been determined, the reduced dip ole matrix elements < i||D||f >, which are proportional to the transition rates Aif, may be expressed in terms of the reduced matrix elements in LS-coupling. The latter can be reduced further, using angul ar momentum theory, to <γLSJ ||D||γ′L′S′J′>=δSS′(2J+ 1)1/2(2J′+ 1)1/2(−1)L+1+S+J′/braceleftbiggSLJ 1J′L′/bracerightbigg <γLS ||D||γ′L′S′> . (3) 2In the single electron (or Coulomb) approximation the reduc ed dipole matrix element is proportional to the dipole transition moment σγγ′: <γLS ||D||γ′L′S′>= (2L+ 1)1/2σγγ′ (4) where σγγ′=√ 3/integraldisplay∞ 0u5p(r)er u5s(r)dr (5) andu5p(r),u5s(r) are the radial wavefunctions of the valence electron. In th is simple semi-empirical model the relative transition rates, and thus the lifetime ratios , depend on the intermediate coupling coefficients a(γLSJ, ·) of the 5p and 5s configurations, and the absolute scale is giv en by one single transition moment σγγ′for the entire 5p–5s transition array. When we use the transition moment σγγ′= 3.04 a.u. that was obtained in the semi-empirical calculation by Lilly [21] we find that, on average, the six exp erimental BGLS lifetimes can be reproduced no better than within 7%. The predictions from this semi-emp irical model for the remaining lifetimes are presumably not more accurate than the recommended experime ntal values are (see Table 1). It appears unlikely that the mixing coefficients of the 5s and 5p configura tions are responsible for the lesser accuracy of the semi-empirical lifetimes since the reproduction of the experimental energies by the semi-empirical inter- mediate coupling method is quite good [21]. The problem is th e assumption of one single transition moment σγγ′for the entire transition array. To refine the semi-empirica l model, we assumed LS-dependent transi- tion moments σγγ′(L,S,L′,S′) which correspond to LS-dependent radial functions u5p(LS) and u5s(L′S′) in Eq. 5. These are similar to those used, for example, in Hart ree-Fock calculations. We further assumed that spin-orbit interaction only results in a mixture of LS- terms but not in a modification of the radial wavefunctions. Since a calculation of these transition mom ents from first principles or from experimental energies would not have been accurate enough for our purpose s we determined the transition moments from the six reference lifetimes from BGLS. In total six different non-zero transition moments are neede d for the description of the 5p-5s array. They correspond to the six allowed transitions in LS-coupling (see Table 3). In one case, for the transition 5p3D→5s3P, the transition moment may be calculated directly from the lifetime of the level 2p 9since both the initial (3D3) and the final state (3P2) of the only decay channel are pure states in LS-coupling. Generally, the transition moments have to be determined by means of a non linear least-squares fit procedure that adjusts the transition moments so as to get best agreement of the calculated lifetimes with the six reference lifetimes from BGLS. The results are summarized in Table 3. T he quoted standard uncertainties of the semi- empirical transition moments and lifetimes were obtained b y Gaussian propagation of the uncertainties of the reference lifetimes, the uncertainties in the energy pa rameters (see [21]), and the uncertainties of the contributing branching ratios. The energy matrices and the intermediate coupling coefficien ts of the 5p and 5s configurations (see Table 2) were recalculated from the Slater- and spin-orbit p arameters (including the αL(L+ 1) correction) given by Lilly [21]. The six reference states (2p 3,4,6..9) for which the lifetimes are known very accurately are mostly built from the four LS-terms1P,1D,3P, and3D. The four corresponding transition moments could thus be deduced with high accuracy (see Table 3). The transit ion moment of the transition 5p3S→5s3P was determined with a somewhat greater uncertainty from the lifetime of the 2p 3state. This state is the only one in the set of reference states that contains a releva nt contribution (16%) from the3S term. The1S term only contributes to the states 2p 1and 2p 5which are not included in the set of reference states. For the determination of the transition moment of the transition 5p1S→5s1P we resorted to branching fractions as additional criteria. Particularly, we used branching fr actions of the weak decay channels 2p 1→1s4and 2p5→1s2which are sensitive to the transition moment sought after. T he dependence of the branching fractions for these transitions and the upper level lifetim es on the transition moment is shown in figure Fig. 3. The attainable accuracy for the transition moment, h owever, is limited by the uncertainty in the branching fractions. 3As a last technical detail we note that for the four highest 5p levels (2p 1...2p4) there are weak far-IR decay channels to states of the 4d configuration which have to be accounted for. For this purpose we used the theoretical transition rates calculated by Ayma r and Coulombe [23]. Because of the huge discrepancies between length- and velocity-form results f or the 5p–4d transition rates we used the greater velocity-form results with a pessimistic uncertainty esti mate of ±100% (see Table 2). The uncertainties of the four semi-empirical lifetimes (se e Table 2) for the states 2p 1, 2p2, 2p5, and 2p10vary between 0.1% and 3.7% depending on the LS-terms they are built from. The 2p 2state allows for a very precise lifetime calculation because it relates to th e four accurately determined transition moments only. The lifetime predictions for the other three levels ar e less accurate because they include significant contributions from the two less accurate transition moment s. Our semi-empirical predictions agree very well with the best previous experimental values (see column BE in Table 1) but they are of superior accuracy and we used them for the normalization of our transition rate s. 3 Branching fractions The measurement of branching fractions for the transition f rom 5p levels presents a formidable task owing to the metastable nature of the lower 5s and 5s′levels (see Fig. 1) which may render the lamp discharge column optically thick for transitions to those levels. We h ave measured branching fractions for 30 lines arising from 5p levels in the wavelength range from 556.2 nm t o 1878.5 nm in two separate experiments. The spectral lines in the visible part of the Kr Ispectrum were measured in air with a wall-stabilized arc discharge and a 2m – Czerny-Turner monochromator. The infra red portion of the spectrum was measured with a hollow-cathode lamp and the NIST 2m – Fourier transfor m spectrometer. The comparison of the results from the two different experiments made it easier for us to notice systematic errors due to optically thick transitions in the light sources. The four 5p′– 4d transitions (see Fig. 1) near 10000 nm were outside the range of either experiment. 3.1 Wall-stabilized arc measurements The experimental setup for the measurements is shown schema tically in Fig. 2. In our experiment we used the wall-stabilized arc previously described in detail by M usielok et al. [9]. The space near the electrodes was operated in argon while the midsection of the arc channel contained helium with a small admixture of krypton. The fraction of krypton in helium was maintained be low 0.3% to avoid self-absorption of krypton lines. The arc was operated at a current of 50 A. To check for op tical thickness, the krypton spectra were measured with varying amounts of krypton in the discharge. When the wall-stabilized arc is operated in helium, spectra l lines remain narrow and continuum emission is low because of the low electron density in a heliu m arc. This facilitates more accurate line intensity measurements because spectral lines are well iso lated and the ratio of line to continuum intensity is high. It was not necessary to achieve LTE conditions in the arc plasma, because we were only interested in the measurement of branching ratios of spectral lines. Th e measurements were performed in a side-on configuration to avoid interloping argon lines and argon pla sma continuum radiation that are emitted at the ends of the arc. As indicated in Fig. 2, either the wall–stabi lized arc or a tungsten strip standard lamp were imaged onto the entrance slit of a 2 m Czerny–Turner monochro mator by a concave mirror with a magnifi- cation factor of approximately 1.3. A beam splitter was plac ed in the beam path to reflect a fraction of the light into the 0.25 m monochromator that was used to monitor t he discharge stability. This monochromator was set to the 760.2 nm line of Kr I. The total intensity of this line was measured with a photomu ltiplier tube and a chart recorder and showed less than 1% fluctuation d uring our measurements. The krypton spectra were recorded with a CCD camera that was mounted at th e exit plane of the monochromator. The measured spectral line profiles were first corrected for the s pectral response of the experimental system, as determined with the standard lamp, and the residual conti nuum was subtracted. The lines were then 4integrated by fitting a spline function to the data using a pro gram package published by Renka[10] which yields the integral of the spectral line without requiring t hat the apparatus function be known analytically. 3.2 Hollow cathode lamp measurements The experiment described in the previous section was unsuit ed for measurements in the infrared because it was set up in air. A second experiment in a purged environme nt was therefore carried out to measure the intensity of lines in the infrared. This used a high-reso lution Fourier transform spectrometer to observe spectra of a hollow cathode lamp. The high-current hollow cathode lamp we used was developed b y Danzmann et al. [11]. For our measurements it was equipped with a cathode made of oxygen-f ree copper which is easy to operate and has no lines that blend with the krypton lines of interest. The ho llow cathode lamp was operated with between 130 Pa and 250 Pa of argon or neon as a carrier gas for the discha rge with an admixture of between 0.5 Pa and 10 Pa. The discharge current was varied between 100 mA and 500 mA. The experimental setup was similar to the one used with the wall-stabilized arc. The ent ire imaging system was enclosed in a purge box that was continuously purged with water vapor and carbon dio xide free air to suppress absorption by these gases in the near infrared. Many lines were strongly self-absorbed when pure krypton wa s used as a carrier gas in the hollow cathode lamp discharge. This problem was partly overcome wh en the partial pressure of krypton in the discharge was reduced by using a neon-krypton mixture in the hollow cathode lamp. We also found that the spectra obtained with high currents where the copper densit y in the discharge is high show self absorption only in the very strongest lines. We assume that the metastab le 5s states were depopulated by charge-transfer collisions with copper atoms in the hollow cathode lamp disc harge. The NIST 2m – Fourier transform spectrometer (described in N aveet al. [12]) was used to measure the spectra of the hollow cathode lamp and the standard lamp. A resolution of around 0.01 cm−1was used for the measurements of the krypton spectra. For the near IR regi on, a liquid nitrogen cooled indium-antimonide detector was used whereas silicon photodiodes were used to r ecord spectra below 1000 nm. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, colored glass filters were employed to restrict the bandpass of the spectrometer to the wavenumber range of interest. The spectral sensitivity of t he optical and detection systems was calibrated with the standard lamp before and after measurements of the s pectra of the light from the hollow cathode discharge. Some residual self-absorption was evident for t he strongest lines even at low krypton partial pressures. For those lines we relied on the results from the e xperiment with the wall-stabilized arc, where these lines remained optically thin. 3.3 Data analysis and uncertainties It is common that the the uncertainty of experimental transi tion rates is limited by the uncertainty of the measurement of the upper level lifetimes and not by the uncer tainty of the branching fraction measurement. In our case, the situation is reversed. The uncertainty of th e branching fraction measurement is limited by the uncertainty of the radiometric calibration which is a round 2%. The uncertainties of the upper level lifetimes are generally much lower. In this section we will d escribe in detail how the uncertainties for the branching fractions were calculated. The transition rate Akiof a transition from a particular upper level kto lower level ican be calculated from a measurement of the upper level lifetime τkand a measurement of the branching fraction Fki– the fraction that the transition to icontributes to the total decay rate: Aki=1 τkFki,where Fki=Aki/summationtext jAki. (6) The branching fractions can in turn be calculated from the re lative intensities Ikiof the lines (in photons/s) 5by Fki=Iki/summationtext jIki(7) where the sum is over all the lower levels to which the upper le vel can decay. Several independent measurements of the Kr Ispectrum were made with different operating condi- tions for the hollow cathode lamp. The relative intensity ˆIα kiof each spectral line in each measured spectrum αwas calculated from the observed intensity Iα kiand the relative efficiency of the spectrometer ǫ(σ) at the wavenumber σof the spectral line by: ˆIα ki=Iα ki(σ) ǫ(σ)(8) where the relative efficiency of the optical system was assume d to be constant over the width of the spectral line. These intensities were then divided by a normalizing f actor ˆIα norm to put all the intensities in all spectra on the same relative intensity scale. This normalizing fact or was usually chosen such that the intensity of one strong line common to all spectra was 1, hence making the i ntensities relative with respect to that strong line. This approach was found to be more reliable than using a weighted mean of the intensities, as lines in some of the spectra may be affected by self-absorption, or be t oo weak to be measured. The weighted mean relative intensity of the line ¯Ikiwas then found using: ¯Iki=1/summationtext αwα ki/summationdisplay αwα kiˆIα ki ˆIαnorm(9) where wα kiis a weighting factor. The weighting factor chosen for the ho llow cathode measurements was the signal-to-noise ratio of the line. The small uncertainty of the normalization line intensity is due to its high signal-to-noise ratio. These branching ratios are convert ed to branching fractions and transition rates using equations 6 and 7. Absolute transition rates are then determined from the mean values of between 5 and 9 independent measurements of the relative intensities and experimental lifetime data. They are presented in table 4, along with the lifetimes of the upper levels used to determine the t ransition rates. The uncertainties given in the table result from the estimated standard deviation of the br anching fractions and the uncertainty of the lifetime data. The estimated standard deviation of the bran ching fractions depends on the uncertainty in the weighted mean relative intensity, which in turn depends on the individual measurements of the intensity through equation 9, and the uncertainty in the radiometric c alibration of the spectrometer. The estimated uncertainty in the individual measurements o f the intensity was taken as the intensity divided by the signal-to-noise ratio: ˆIα ki/wα ki. When photon noise is the dominant source of uncertainty, th e square of the signal-to-noise ratio must be used as the weigh ting factor in equation 9. We chose to weight the individual intensity measurements with the signal-to- noise ratio to account for a significant systematic component in the uncertainty which may result from self-abs orption or line blends. The statistical component in the uncertainty of the weighte d mean relative intensity ustat(ˆIki) can then be derived by applying the law of propagation of uncerta inty to equation 9: ustat(¯Iki) =/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt/summationdisplay α/parenleftBiggˆIα ki ˆIαnorm·1 wα ki/parenrightBigg2 where the sum is again over all the observations of the lines. This must be added in quadrature to the uncertainty in the radiometric calibration of the spectrom eter, which was estimated at 3.3% for one standard deviation. This estimate includes the uncertainty in the su pplied calibration of the standard lamp (1.5% for one standard deviation) and a contribution of 3% for the m easurement of the standard lamp spectrum. The total uncertainty in the measurement of the weighted mea n relative intensities is thus: u(¯Iki) =/radicalBig u2 stat(¯Iki) + (0.033¯Iki)2 (10) 6The uncertainty in the measurement of the branching fractio nsu(Fki) is derived by applying the law of propagation of uncertainty to equation 7 to give: u(Fki) =/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbtu2(¯Iki) (/summationtext i¯Iki)2+¯I2 ki (/summationtext i¯Iki)4/summationdisplay ju2(¯Iki) (11) This is combined in quadrature with the uncertainty in the li fetime u(τk) to give the uncertainty in the transition rate u(Aki): u(Aki) =/radicalBigg 1 τ2 ku2(Fki) +F2 ki τ4 ku2(τk) (12) For the wall-stabilized arc measurements, the transition r ates and their uncertainties were calculated simi- larly. 4 Discussion of results Our new transition rates for 5p – 5s transitions in Kr Iare listed in Table 4. Also listed in Table 4 are our experimental branching fractions and the lifetimes that we re used to calculate the transition rates. In Table 5 and Fig. 4 we compare our transition rates with seve ral experimental results. The only other measurement that includes the lines in the IR is th at of Chang, Horiguchi and Setser [3] and a comparison of those results with our data is shown in Fig. 5. T he results by Fonseca and Campos [4, 5], presented in Fig. 4, were recalculated using the same lifeti me data as in our work. For the set of strong lines around 800 nm our transition rates are in good agreemen t with most of the results obtained by Fonseca and Campos [4, 5] and differ from those obtained by Ernst et al. [6] by about 10%. The results of Kaschek et al. [8] differ from ours by a constant scaling factor of 1.3, on ave rage. Only in the case of the line at 810.4 nm, all other experimental data exceed our result by 20 %–30%. The most striking difference between previous measurements and our results is that our transition rates for the set of weak lines near 600 nm are much lower than a ll previous measurements with the exception of the experiment by Brandt, Helbig and Nick [7]. This strong ly suggests that many of the earlier experiments had problems with self-absorption of the strong lines aroun d 800 nm which would make the weak lines in a set of transitions from a particular upper level appear stro nger. It is also interesting to compare our results with the theore tical calculations because all calculations were intermediate-coupling calculations in the Coulomb ap proximations whereas our semi-empirical lifetimes were obtained with a modified intermediate-coupling scheme . Fig. 6 compares our results to the most recent calculations. The earlier calculations by Murphy [22] are n ot included because they were superseded by those of Lilly [21]. For the strongest lines near 800 nm the best agr eement, within 10% on average, was found between our data and calculations made by Aymar and Coulombe [23] with a velocity dipole operator, while there is a constant disagreement (a factor of 1/3) when they used a length dipole operator. A similar discrepancy was found with calculations made by Lilly [21]. We note that the discrepancies for the weak lines near 600 nm and in the IR are considerable but there appe ar to be no conspicuous systematic trends as we found in the experimental data. Acknowledgments K. Dzier˙ z֒ega gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Mari a Sk/suppress lodowska-Curie Foundation through grant number MEN–NIST–96–260. We are grateful to W. L. Wiese, NIST, K. Musio/suppress l, Jagiel- lonian University, Krak´ ow, and H. Schmoranzer, Universit y of Kaiserslautern for helpful discussions and continued support. G. Nave and U. Griesmann were supported b y NIST contracts number 43SBNB867005 and 43SBNB960002 to Harvard College Observatory. 7References [1] H. Schmoranzer and U. Volz, Phys. Scr. T47, 42–48 (1993). [2] A. Schmitt, N. Pisella, U. Volz, and H. Schmoranzer, 6th I nternational Colloquium on Atomic Spectra and Oscillator Strengths for Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas (ASOS6). Abstracts of Contributed Oral Papers and Poster Papers, Ed. J. Tatum, University of Vi ctoria (Victoria, BC), p.143 (1998). [3] R. S. F. Chang, H. Horiguchi, and D. W. Setser, J. Chem. Phy s.73, 778 (1980). [4] V. Fonseca and J. Campos, Physica 97C, 312 (1979). [5] V. Fonseca and J. Campos, J. Phys. B 13, 3957 (1980). [6] W. E. Ernst and E. Schulz–Gulde, Physica 93C, 136 (1978). [7] T. Brandt, V. Helbig and K.–P. Nick, J. Phys. B 15, 2139 (1982). [8] K. Kaschek, G. Ernst and W. B¨ otticher, Physica 123C , 238 (1984). [9] J. Musielok, W. L. Wiese and G. Veres, Phys. Rev. A 51, 3588 (1995). [10] R. J. Renka, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp. 8, 393 (1987). [11] K. Danzmann, M. G¨ unther, J. Fischer, M. Kock and M. K¨ uh ne, Appl. Opt. 27, 4947 (1988). [12] G. Nave, C. J. Sansonetti and U. Griesmann, “ Progress on the NIST IR–vis–UV Fourier transform spectrometer ”, in Fourier Transform Spectroscopy, Vol. 3, 1997 OSA Techn ical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington DC, 1997), 38 (1997). [13] B. D. Cannon, W. L. Glab, and R. Ogorzalek-Loo, Phys. Rev .A47, 147 (1993). [14] C. A. Whitehead, H. Pournasr, M. R. Bruce, H. Cai, J. Kohe l, W. B. Layne, and J. W. Keto, J. Chem. Phys.102, 1965 (1995). [15] A. L. Osherovich and Ya. F. Verolainen, Leningrad State University Vestnik, N4, 140 (1967). [16] M. V. Fonseca and J. Campos, Phys. Rev. A17, 1080 (1978). [17] D. A. Landman and R. Dobrin, Phys. Rev. A8, 1868 (1973). [18] J.-P. Lemoigne, X. Husson, and J. Margerie, Opt. Commun .15, 241 (1975). [19] S. A. Kazantsev, A. G. Rys, and M. P. Chaika, Opt. Spectro sc.44, 249 (1978). [20] M. B. Gorny, S. A. Kazantsev, B. G. Matisov, and N. T. Pole zhaevs, J. Phys. B 322, 322 (1985). [21] R. A. Lilly, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 245 (1976). [22] P. W. Murphy, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 1200 (1968). [23] M. Aymar and M. Coulombe, Atomica Data and Nuclear Data T ables21, 537 (1978). 8Table 1: Experimental lifetimes of the KrI 5p states. (Uncer tainties are given in parentheses.) Level Experimental lifetimes (ns) WSA1[6] PL2[3] PL2[13, 14] BGLS3[1] BGLS3[2] BE4 2p15p′[1/2] 024.6(1.5) — — — — 24.6(2.0) 2p25p′[3/2] 232.0(1.9) 26.9(0.3) — — — 29.5(2.4) 2p35p′[1/2] 127.2(1.6) 26.8(1.7) — — 28.075(30) 2p45p′[3/2] 127.9(1.7) 27.2(1.6) — — 29.402(42) 2p55p [1/2] 023.4(1.4) — 23.5(1.0) [14] — — 23.5(1.9) 2p65p [3/2] 228.6(1.7) 25.4(0.8) 26.4(0.5) [14] 27.35(6) 27.345(16) 2p75p [3/2] 132.3(1.9) 29.7(1.0) — 29.51(6) 29.619(17) 2p85p [5/2] 229.6(4.6) 26.5(2.0) 32.5(0.8) [13] 32.10(9) 32.041(47) 2p95p [5/2] 334.6(+2.2 −5.8) 28.7(2.0) 30.2(1.4) [13] 27.73(7) 27.694(18) 2p105p [1/2] 1 — 40.9(1.7) — — — 40.9(3.3) 1Wall-stabilized arc emission. Quoted uncertainties do not include the uncertainty of the absolute intensity scale for the transition rates of ±30%. 2Lifetimes from pulsed laser excitation. 3Lifetimes from beam-gas-laser spectroscopy. 4Best estimate of non-BGLS experimental lifetimes. Table 2: Semi-empirical lifetimes and decomposition in LS-terms for the KrI 5p states. Level LSdecomposition1(%) Far-IR Lifetimes (ns) 1S1P1D3S3P3D branches2(%) CA3[21] this work4 2p15p′[1/2] 043 — — — 57 — 0.246 24.37 24.58 ±0.85 2p25p′[3/2] 2— — 34 — 21 44 0.034 29.10 28.59 ±0.07 2p35p′[1/2] 1— 19 — 16 61 3 0.106 26.35 28.08 ±0.07 2p45p′[3/2] 1— 24 — 1 1 74 0.0045 30.65 29.34 ±0.04 2p55p [1/2] 057 — — — 43 — — 23.54 23.12 ±0.85 2p65p [3/2] 2— — 22 — 75 4 — 25.43 27.34 ±0.02 2p75p [3/2] 1— 53 — — 24 23 — 30.09 29.62 ±0.02 2p85p [5/2] 2— — 44 — 4 52 — 34.03 32.05 ±0.06 2p95p [5/2] 3— — — — — 100 — 28.77 27.70 ±0.02 2p105p [1/2] 1— 4 — 83 14 — — 40.30 38.13 ±1.07 1Recalculated from the parameters given by Lilly [21]. 2Total far-IR (5p-4d) decay rate over total decay rate. Estim ated uncertainty ±100%. 3Intermediate coupling with transition moment from Coulomb approximation. 4Intermediate coupling with LS-dependent transition moments from Table 3. Note the excell ent agreement of these semi-empirical lifetimes with the experimental BG LS lifetimes in Table 1. 9Table 3: LS-dependent transition moments for the KrI 5p-5s transition array. Transition Transition moment σ(a.u.) 5p1S− → 5s1P 3.22 ±0.18 5p1P− → 5s1P 3.146 ±0.003 5p1D− → 5s1P 3.205 ±0.014 5p3S− → 5s3P 3.173 ±0.057 5p3P− → 5s3P 2.853 ±0.073 5p3D− → 5s3P 3.085 ±0.001 10Table 4: Branching fractions Fkiand absolute transition rates Akifor all 30 5p – 5s transitions in neutral Kr. Upper level Lower level λ(nm) τ(ns)1Fki(WSA)2Fki(HCL)3Aki(106s−1) 5p’[1/2] 0(2p1) 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 557.31 24.58±0.85 <10−3<0.04 5s’[1/2] 1(1s2) 768.52 >0.999 40.64 ±0.2 5p’[3/2] 2(2p2) 5s[3/2] 2(1s5) 556.22 28.59±0.07 0.003±0.004 0.11 ±0.01 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 587.09 0.020 ±0.004 0.71 ±0.14 5s’[1/2] 1(1s2) 826.32 0.977 ±0.005 34.16 ±0.19 5p’[1/2] 1(2p3) 5s[3/2] 2(1s5) 557.03 28.075 ±0.03 0.028 ±0.0016 0.98 ±0.056 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 587.99 0.002 ±0.0002 0.055 ±0.006 5s’[1/2] 0(1s3) 785.48 0.573 ±0.008 20.41 ±0.5 5s’[1/2] 1(1s2) 828.11 0.398 ±0.014 14.18 ±0.5 5p’[3/2] 1(2p4) 5s[3/2] 2(1s5) 567.25 29.402 ±0.042 0.00044 ±0.0001 0.015 ±0.003 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 599.39 0.0015 ±0.0002 0.050 ±0.007 5s’[1/2] 0(1s3) 805.95 0.465 ±0.014 15.83 ±0.49 5s’[1/2] 1(1s2) 850.89 0.533 ±0.015 18.11 ±0.51 5p[1/2] 0(2p5) 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 758.74 23.12±0.85 0.9965 ±0.0033 43.10 ±0.6 5s’[1/2] 1(1s2) 1212.35 0.0035 ±0.0003 0.15 ±0.015 5p[3/2] 2(2p6) 5s[3/2] 2(1s5) 760.15 27.345 ±0.016 0.743 ±0.007 0.751 ±0.008 27.32 ±0.18 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 819.01 0.248 ±0.009 0.241 ±0.008 8.94 ±0.22 5s’[1/2] 1(1s2) 1373.89 0.0083 ±0.0003 0.31 ±0.01 5p[3/2] 1(2p7) 5s[3/2] 2(1s5) 769.45 29.619 ±0.017 0.127 ±0.004 0.127 ±0.004 4.27 ±0.11 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 829.81 0.868 ±0.005 29.31 ±0.18 5s’[1/2] 0(1s3) 1286.19 0.0031 ±0.0002 0.076 ±0.005 5s][1/2] 1(1s2) 1404.57 0.0023 ±0.0001 0.106 ±0.006 5p[5/2] 2(2p8) 5s[3/2] 2(1s5) 810.44 32.041 ±0.047 0.288 ±0.015 0.287 ±0.009 8.96 ±0.29 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 877.68 0.709 ±0.01 0.710 ±0.009 22.17 ±0.29 5s’[1/2] 1(1s2) 1547.40 0.0026 ±0.0001 0.081 ±0.004 5p[3/2] 3(2p9) 5s[3/2] 2(1s5) 811.29 27.694 ±0.018 1.00 1.00 36.1 ±0.09 5p[1/2] 1(2p10) 5s[3/2] 2(1s5) 892.87 38.13±1.07 0.873 ±0.004 22.89 ±0.65 5s[3/2] 1(1s4) 975.18 0.120 ±0.004 0.120 ±0.004 3.13 ±0.14 5s’[1/2] 0(1s3) 1672.65 0.0048 ±0.0002 0.126 ±0.006 5s’[1/2] 1(1s2) 1878.55 0.0028 ±0.0001 0.074 ±0.003 1Lifetimes of the upper levels are experimental lifetimes fr om Schmitt et al. [2] (see also Table 1) and semi- empirical lifetimes from Table 2. Semi-empirical lifetime s are printed in italics. 2Wall-stabilized arc measurement. 3Hollow-cathode lamp measurement. 11Table 5: Compilation of experimental and theoretical trans ition rates for 5p – 5s transitions in Kr I. Upper level Lower level λ(nm) Aki(106s−1)1[6] [4, 5] [7] [8] [3] [21] [23]2[23]3 5p’[1/2] 0 5s[3/2] 1 557.31 <0.04 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.437 0.251 5s’[1/2] 1 768.52 40.64(20) 40.7 40.2 45.2 41.19 49.6 32.9 5p’[3/2] 2 5s[3/2] 2 556.22 0.11(1) 0.23 0.36 0.18 0.27 0.49 0.595 0.201 5s[3/2] 1 587.09 0.71(14) 1.48 1.8 0.86 1.6 1.92 2.39 0.933 5s’[1/2] 1 826.32 34.16(19) 29.5 32.8 42.8 35.3 32.31 41.1 32.2 5p’[1/2] 1 5s[3/2] 2 557.03 0.980(56) 1.71 2.4 1.37 1.9 3.18 3.91 1.32 5s[3/2] 1 587.99 0.055(6) 0.13 0.049 0.093 0.14 0.198 0.0848 5s’[1/2] 0 785.48 20.41(50) 19.5 20.6 21.2 20.27 25.4 18.0 5s’[1/2] 1 828.11 14.18(50) 15.6 13.3 19.5 14.2 14.62 18.8 14.7 5p’[3/2] 1 5s[3/2] 2 567.25 0.015(3) 0.02 0.022 0.02 0.01 0.00455 0.00168 5s[3/2] 1 599.39 0.050(7) 0.09 0.052 0.07 0.06 0.0841 0.0397 5s’[1/2] 0 805.95 15.83(49) 15.8 15.7 22.6 17.5 16.44 21.2 15.8 5s’[1/2] 1 850.89 18.11(51) 20.0 18.3 19.1 16.37 20.6 17.1 5p[1/2] 0 5s[3/2] 1 758.74 43.1(6) 42.8 58.2 43.8 42.8 52.4 33.8 5s’[1/2] 1 1212.35 0.150(15) 0.04 0.01 0.00143 0.000407 5p[3/2] 2 5s[3/2] 2 760.15 27.32(18) 25.8 27.3 35.6 28.6 30.28 38.6 25.5 5s[3/2] 1 819.01 8.94(22) 9.15 9.3 12.5 10.4 9.23 11.6 8.88 5s’[1/2] 1 1373.89 0.31(1) 0.3 0.13 0.164 0.356 5p[3/2] 1 5s[3/2] 2 769.45 4.27(11) 4.7 4.4 4.41 5.01 6.52 4.42 5s[3/2] 1 829.81 29.31(18) 26.3 29.5 29.0 28.40 36.0 28.3 5s’[1/2] 0 1286.19 0.076(5) 0.10 0.03 0.0345 0.0664 5s][1/2] 1 1404.57 0.106(6) 0.13 0.05 0.0633 0.141 5p[5/2] 2 5s[3/2] 2 810.44 8.96(29) 11.0 10.9 11.7 8.16 9.99 12.6 9.5 5s[3/2] 1 877.68 22.17(29) 22.8 20.2 22.9 19.59 26.1 22.2 5s’[1/2] 1 1547.40 0.081(4) 0.09 0.04 0.0477 0.131 5p[3/2] 3 5s[3/2] 2 811.29 36.10(9) 28.9 39.0 34.8 35.03 44.6 33.7 5p[1/2] 1 5s[3/2] 2 892.87 22.89(65) 30.7 26.2 19.8 22.30 28.4 26.1 5s[3/2] 1 975.18 3.13(14) 3.4 4.28 2.63 3.43 3.75 5s’[1/2] 0 1672.65 0.126(6) 0.15 0.05 0.0617 0.201 5s’[1/2] 1 1878.55 0.074(3) 0.17 0.03 0.0344 0.143 1From Table 4 2Length form 3Velocity form 12080859095100 5p'[1/2]0 [3/2]2 [1/2]1 [3/2]1 [1/2]0 5p [3/2]2 [3/2]1 [5/2] 2 [5/2] 3 [1/2]1 ground state4p6S1 05s' [1/2]0[1/2]1 [3/2]2[3/2]15s4p 4d5Level Energy/hc (1000 cm )-1 Figure 1: 5s and 5p energy levels of Kr I. The levels are labele d in J cK–coupling notation which is the most appropriate for the spectra of the noble gases. The primed an d unprimed levels are distinguished by their different core angular momenta J c. The core level of the unprimed levels is 4p5 2P3/2whereas it is 4p5 2P1/2 for the primed levels. The two 5s levels with angular momenta of 0 and 2 cannot decay into the ground state via electric dipole transitions. Several transition s from 5p’ levels to 4p54d levels in the infrared near 10000 nm are outside the wavelength range that was accessibl e in our experiments. 132m Czerny- Turner monochromatorTungsten strip standard lamp Wall- stabilized arcCMBSCCD 1/4m monochromatorMα α Figure 2: Schematic of the experimental setup for the measur ements with the wall-stabilized arc. The radiation from the arc or the radiometric standard lamp were imaged onto the entrance slit of a 2m– monochromator by a curved mirror CM. A flat mirror M, that was m ounted on a turntable allowed to alternate between both lightsources. A small fraction of th e light was imaged onto the entrance slit of a 1/4m–monochromator with a beam splitter BS. This monochro mator remained set to the Kr I line at 760.2 nm to monitor the stability of the arc discharge. The ex perimental setup for the measurements with the NIST 2m – Fourier transform spectrometer was identical b ut the imaging system was enclosed in a box that was purged with water vapor- and carbon dioxide- free ai r. 142.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Transition moment σ(1S,1P) (atomic units)2021222324252627Lifetime τk (ns)2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.502468Branching fraction 103 Akiτk 2p5 − 1s2 calculated 2p5 − 1s2 measured 2p1 − 1s4 calculated 2p1 − 1s4 measured Figure 3: Dependence of lifetimes and branching fractions o f the levels 2p 1and 2p 5on the transition moment σ(1S,1P). The top part of the figure shows how the measured branching fraction determines the transition moment which, in turn, determines the lifetime, as illustra ted in the bottom part of the figure. 15550 600 650 7007508008509009501000 Wavelength (nm)1.01.52.02.53.0Aki / Aki(this paper)This paper W. E. Ernst and E. Schulz−Gulde [6] V. Fonseca and J. Campos [4],[5] T. Brandt et al. [7] K. Kaschek et al. [8] Figure 4: Ratio of transition rates from several earlier exp eriments and our results. 16600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Wavelength (nm)0.51.01.52.02.5Aki / Aki(this paper) This paper Chang et al. [3] Figure 5: A comparison of our transition rates with the compl ete set of 5p–5s transition rates measured by Chang, Horiguchi and Setser [3]. 17600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Wavelength (nm)0.010.11.010Aki / Aki(this paper) This paper R. A. Lilly [21] M. Aymar et al. [23] (length) M. Aymar et al. [23] (velocity) Figure 6: A comparison of our transition rates with theoreti cal transition rates. 18

1 ON THE COMPUTATIONAL CAPABILITIES OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS PART I: THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF INFALLIBLE COMPUTATION by David H. Wolpert NASA Ames Research Center, N269-1, Moffett Field, CA 94035, dhw@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov PACS numbers: 02.10.By, 02.60.Cb, 03.65.Bz Abstract: In this first of two papers, strong limits on the accuracy of physical computation are established. First it is proven that there cannot be a physical computer C to which one can pose any and all computational tasks concerning the physical universe. Next it is proven that no physi- cal computer C can correctly carry out any computational task in the subset of such tasks that can be posed to C. This result holds whether the computational tasks concern a system that is physi- cally isolated from C, or instead concern a system that is coupled to C. As a particular example, thisresultmeansthattherecannotbeaphysicalcomputerthatcan,foranyphysicalsystemexter- nal to that computer, take the specification of that external system’s state as input and then cor- rectly predict its future state before that future state actually occurs; one cannot build a physical computer that can be assured of correctly “processing information faster than the universe does”. The results also mean that there cannot exist an infallible, general-purpose observation apparatus, andthattherecannotbeaninfallible,general-purposecontrolapparatus.Theseresultsdonotrely on systems that are infinite, and/or non-classical, and/or obey chaotic dynamics. They also hold even if one uses an infinitely fast, infinitely dense computer, with computational powers greater than that of a Turing Machine. This generality is a direct consequence of the factthat a novel def- inition of computation — a definition of “physical computation” — is needed to address the issues considered in these papers. While this definition does not fit into the traditional Chomsky2 hierarchy, the mathematical structure and impossibility results associated with it have parallels in the mathematics of the Chomsky hierarchy. The second in this pair of papers presents a prelimi- nary exploration of some of this mathematical structure, including in particular that of prediction complexity,whichisa“physicalcomputationanalogue”ofalgorithmicinformationcomplexity.It isproveninthatsecondpaperthateithertheHamiltonianofouruniverseproscribesacertaintype of computation, or prediction complexity is unique (unlike algorithmic information complexity), in that there is one and only version of it that can be applicable throughout our universe.3 INTRODUCTION Recently there has been heightened interest in the relationship between physics and computa- tion ([1-33]). This interest extends far beyond the topic of quantum computation. On the one hand, physics has been used to investigate the limits on computation imposed by operating com- puters in the real physical universe. Conversely, there has been speculation concerning the limits imposed on the physical universe (or at least imposed on our models of the physical universe) by the need for the universe to process information, as computers do. To investigate this second issue one would like to know what fundamental distinctions, if any, there are between the physical universe and a physical computer. To address this issue this first of a pair of papers begins by establishing that the universe cannot contain a computer to which one can pose any arbitrary computational task. Accordingly, this paper goes on to consider computer- indexedsubsetsofcomputationaltasks,whereallthemembersofanysuchsubset canbeposedto the associated computer. It then proves that one cannot build a computer that can “process infor- mationfasterthantheuniverse”.Moreprecisely,itisshownthatonecannotbuildacomputerthat can, for any physical system, correctly predict any aspect of that system’s future state before that future state actually occurs. This is true even if the prediction problem is restricted to be from the set of computational tasks that can be posed to the computer. This asymmetry in computational speeds constitutes a fundamental distinction between the universe and the set of all physical computers. Its existence casts an interesting light on the ideas of Fredkin, Landauer and others concerning whether the universe “is” a computer, whether there are “information-processing restrictions” on the laws of physics, etc. [10, 19]. In a certain sense, theuniverseismorepowerfulthananyinformation-processingsystemconstructedwithinitcould be. This result can alternatively be viewed as a restriction on the universe as a whole — the uni- versecannotsupporttheexistencewithinitofacomputerthatcanprocessinformationasfastasit can. To establish this result concerning prediction of the future this paper considers a model of4 computation which is actually general enough to address the performance of other computational tasks as well as prediction of the future. In particular, this result does not rely on temporal order- ings of events, and therefore also establishes that no computer can infallibly predict the past(i.e., perform retrodiction). So any memory system must be fallible; the second law cannot be used to ensureperfectlyfaultlessmemoryofthepast.Accordingly,thepsychologicalarrowoftimeisnot inviolate [24].1The results are also general enough to allow arbitrary coupling of the computer andtheexternaluniverse.Soforexampletheyalsoestablishthattherecannotbeadevicethatcan take the specification of any characteristic of the external universe as input and then correctly observe the value of that characteristic. Similarly, they establish that here cannot be a device that can take the specification of any desired value of a characteristic of the external universe as input and then induce that value in that characteristic. In other words, loosely speaking, there cannot be eitheraninfalliblegeneralpurposecontroldevicenoraninfalliblegeneralpurposecontroldevice. (This second interpretation can be viewed as an uncertainty principle that does not involve quan- tum mechanics.) There are a number of previous results in the literature related to these results of this paper. Many authors have shown how to construct Turing Machines out of physical systems (see for example [10, 22] and references therein). By the usual uncomputability results, there are proper- ties of such systems that cannot be calculated on a physical Turing machine within a fixed allot- ment of time (assuming each step in the calculation takes a fixed non-infinitesimal time). In addition, there have been a number of results explicitly showing how to construct physical sys- tems whose future state is non-computable, without going through the intermediate step of estab- lishing computational universality [13, 23]. There are several important respects in which the results of this paper extend this previous work. All of these previous results rely on infinities of some sort in physically unrealizable sys- tems (e.g., in [23] an infinite number of steps are needed to construct the physical system whose future state is not computable). In addition, they all assume one’s computing device is no more powerfulthanaTuringmachine.Alsononeofthemaremotivatedbyscenarioswherethecompu-5 tation is supposed to be a prediction of the future; in fact, they are not in any sense motivated by considerationofthetemporalrelationbetweenone’sinformationandwhatistobepredicted.Nor aretheyextendabletoallowarbitrarycouplingbetweenthecomputerandtheexternaluniverse,as (for example) in the processes of observation and control. Thereareotherlimitationsthat applytomany ofthesepreviousresultsindividually, whilenot applying to each and every one of them. For example, in [23] it is crucial that we are computing an infinite precision real number rather than a “finite precision” quantity like an integer. As another example, many of these previous results explicitly require chaotic dynamics (e.g., [7]). None of the limitations delineated above apply to the result of this paper. In particular, no physicallyunrealizablesystems,chaoticdynamics,ornon-classicaldynamicsareexploitedinthis paper. The results also hold even if one restricts attention to systems which are finite, i.e., which contain a finite number of degrees of freedom. In all this, the results of this paper constitute a novel kind of physical unpredictability. The results also hold even if the computer is infinitely dense and/or infinitely fast (in which casethespeedoflightwouldbeinfinite).Theresultsalsoholdevenifthecomputerhasaninfinite amount of time to do the calculation. They also hold even if the computer’s initial input explicitly contains the correct value of the variable it is trying to predict, and more generally they hold regardless of the program running on the computer. They also hold for both analog and digital computation, and whether or not the computer’s program can be loaded into its own input (i.e., regardless of the computational universality of the computer). Moreover, the results hold regard- lessofthepowerofone’scomputer,solongasitisphysicallyrealizable.Ifitturnsouttobephys- ically possible to have infinitely fast, infinitely dense computers, with computational power greaterthanthatofaTuringmachine,thentheresultofthispaperholdsforsuchacomputer.Asa particular example, the results also hold even if the “computer” includes one or more human beings. So even if Penrose’s musing on quantum gravity and intelligence turns out to have some validity, it is still true that human intelligence is guaranteed to be wrong sometimes. The way that this paper derives results of such generality is to examine the underlying issue6 from the broad perspective of the computational character of physical systems in general, rather thanthatofsomesinglepreciselyspecifiedphysicalsystem.Theassociatedmathematicsdoesnot directly involve dynamical systems like Turing machines. Rather it casts computation in terms of partitionsofthespaceofpossibleworldlinesoftheuniverse.Forexample,tospecifywhatinputa particularphysicalcomputerhasataparticulartimeistospecifyaparticularsubsetofallpossible worldlines of the universe; different inputs to the computation correspond to different such sub- sets. Similar partitions specify outputs of a physical computer. Results concerning the (im)possi- bility of certain kinds of physical computation are derived by considering the relationship between these kinds of partitions. In its being defined in terms of such partitions, “physical com- putation” involves a structure that need not even be instantiated in some particular physically localizedapparatus;theformaldefinitionofaphysicalcomputerisgeneralenoughtoalsoinclude more subtle non-localized dynamical processes unfolding across the entire universe. Section 1 of this paper generalizes from particular instances of real-world physical computers that try to “reliably and ahead of time predict the future state of any system” to motivate a broad formal definition of such computers in terms of partitions. To maintain maximum breadth of the analysis,wedonotwanttorestrictattentiontophysicalcomputersthatare(orarenot)capableof self-reference.Asanalternative,aselaboratedattheendofSection1,werestrictattentiontouni- verses containing at least two such physical computers. (Put another way, our results hold for any single computer not so powerful as to preclude the possible existence anywhere else in the uni- verse of another computer as powerful as it is — which certainly describes any computer that human beings can ever create.) Section 2 begins by proving that there exist prediction problems that cannot even be posed to one of those two physical computers. Restrictions on the set of pre- diction problems are introduced accordingly. Section 2 then proves that, even within such a restrictedsetofpredictionproblems,onecannothaveapairofcomputerseachofwhichcan,reli- ably and ahead of time, predict the future state of any system. This is even true if one allows the possibility that the computer is initialized by having the correct prediction provided to it. In their most abstract formulation, the results of this section concern arbitrary calculations a7 computer might make concerning the physical universe, not just “predictions” per se. This is how theyalsoestablish(forexample)thenecessarilyfalliblenatureofretrodiction,ofobservation,and of control. These results are all derived through what is essentially a physical version of a Cretan Liar’s paradox; they can be viewed as a physical analogue of Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem, involving two instances of the putative computer rather than self-referential computers. These issues are addressed in the second of these two papers which, while building on the results of the first paper, is meant to be self-contained. The second papers begins with a cursory review of these partition-based definitions and results of the first paper. Despite its being distinct from the mathematics of the Chomsky hierarchy, as elaborated in that paper, the mathematics and impossibility results governing these partitions bears many parallels with that of the Chomsky hierarchy. Section 2 of that second paper explicates some of that mathematical structure, involv- ingtopicsrangingfromerrorcorrectiontothe(lackof)transitivityofcomputationalpredictability across multiple distinct computers. In particular, results are presented concerning physical com- putation analogues of the mathematics of Turing machines, e.g., “universal” physical computers, andHaltingtheoremsforphysicalcomputers.Inaddition,ananalogueofalgorithmicinformation complexity, “prediction complexity”, is elaborated. A task-independent bound is derived on how muchthepredictioncomplexityofacomputationaltaskcandifferfortwodifferentreferenceuni- versal physical computers used to solve that task. This bound is similar to the “encoding” bound governinghowmuchthealgorithmicinformationcomplexityofaTuringmachinecalculationcan differ for two reference universal Turing machines. It is then proven that one of two cases must hold. One is that the Hamiltonian of our universe proscribes a certain type of computation. The other possibility is that, unlike conventional algorithmic information complexity, its physical computation analogue is unique, in that there is one and only version of it that can be applicable throughout our universe. Throughout these papers, B≡{0, 1},ℜis defined to be the set of all real numbers, ‘^’ is the logicalandoperator, and ‘NOT’ is the logical notoperator applied to B. To avoid proliferation of symbols, often set-delineating curly brackets will be used surrounding a single symbol, in which8 casethatsymbolistotakentobeavariablewiththeindicatedsetbeingthesetofallvaluesofthat variable. So for example “{y}” refers to the set of all values of the variable y. In addition o(A) is the cardinality of any set A, and 2Ais the power set of A. u ∈U are the possible states of the uni- verse,and^UisthespaceofallowedtrajectoriesthroughU.So^u∈^Uisasingle-valuedmapfrom t∈ ℜto u∈U, with ut≡^utthe state of the universe at time t. Note that since the universe is microscopically deterministic, utfor any t uniquely specifies^u. Sometimes there will be implicit constraints on^U. For example, we will assume in discussing any particular computer that the space^U is restricted to worldlines^u that contain that computer. An earlier analysis addressing some of the issues considered in this pair of papers can be found in [30]. I. A DEFINITION OF WHAT IT MEANS TO “PREDICT THE FUTURE” i) Definition of a Physical Computer Forthepurposesofthispaper,aphysicalcomputerwill“predictthestateofasystemaheadof time” if the computer is a general emulator of the physical dynamics of such a system, an emula- tor that operates faster than that dynamics. So given some time T > 0, and given some desired informationconcerningthestateofsomesystematT,ourgoalistohavethecomputeroutputthat desiredinformation beforetimeT .Tothatendweallowthecomputertobe“initialized”attime0, withdifferent“input”,dependingonthevalueofT,whatinformationisdesired,perhapsinforma- tion about the current state of the state whose future is being predicted, etc. To make this concrete, we start by distinguishing the specification of what we want the com- puter to calculate from the results of that calculation. Let αbe the value of a variable delineating some information concerning the state of the physical universe at time T (e.g., the values of a finitesetofbitsconcerningthestateofaparticularsystemSresidingintheuniverseatthattime). We indicate a specification that we wish to know αas aquestionq∈Q. So q says what αis for any state of the universe at time T. This means that what we wish our computer to tell us is the9 result of q, a single-valued mapping from the state of the universe at T to α. Since^ufixes uTand (for a deterministic universe) vice-versa, we can generalize this by dis- pensingwithspecificationofT.Inotherwords,wecanrecastanyqasanysingle-valuedmapping from^u toα. So q fixes a partition over the space^U, and any pair ( α, q) delineates a region in^U. In general, the space { α} of “potential answers” of the universe (i.e., the set of partition ele- ment labels) can change depending on q, the “question concerning the universe” (i.e., the parti- tion). We will write the space { α} as A(q) when we need to indicate that dependence explicitly. We formalize all this as follows: Definition 1: Anyquestionq∈Q is a pair, consisting of a set A of answersand a single-valued function from^u∈^U toα ∈A. A(q) indicates the A-component of the pair q. Here we restrict attention to Q that are non-empty and such that there exist at least two elements in A(q) for at least one q ∈Q. We make no other a prioriassumptions concerning the spaces {A(q∈Q)} and Q. In particular, we make no assumptions concerning their finiteness. Without the accompanying q, a valueof α, by itself, ismeaningless. Sowe must know what q waswhenwereadthecomputer’soutput.Accordingly,wetaketheoutputofourcomputertobea question q together with an associated prediction for α. (If the question is only stored in a human user’s memory, then that aspect of the human is implicitly part of the computer.) So our com- puter’soutputisadelineationofasubregionof^u∈^U;those^usuchthatq(^u)=α.Choosesome realnumber τ,where0< τ<T.Ourgoalisthatforanyq ∈Qthereisanassociatedinitial“input” stateofthecomputerwhichensuresthatattime τourcomputer’soutputisacorrectpredictionfor α, in that for the^u of the universe, q(^u ) =α. Example 1 (conventional prediction of the future): Say that our universe contains a system S externaltoourcomputerthatisclosedinthetimeinterval[0,T],andletubethevaluesoftheele- ments of a set of canonical variables describing the universe. αis the t = T values of the compo-10 nentsofuthatconcernS,measuredonsomefinitegridGoffiniteprecision.qisthisdefinitionof αwith G and the like fully specified. (So q is a partition of the space of possible uT, and therefore of^U,andαisanelementofthatpartition.)Qisasetofsuchq’s,differinginG,whoseassociated answers our computer can (we hope) predict correctly. Theinputtothecomputerisimplicitlyreflectedinitst=0physicalstate,asourinterpretation ofthatstate.Inthisexample(thoughnotnecessarilyingeneral),thatinputspecifieswhatquestion we want answered, i.e., which q and associated T we are interested in. It also delineates one of severalregionsR ⊆^U,eachofwhich,intuitively,givesthet=0stateofS.Throughouteachsuch R, the system S is closed from the rest of the universe during t ∈[0, T]. The precise R delineated further specifies a set of possible values ofu0(and therefore of the Hamiltonian describing S), for examplebybeinganelementofa(perhapsirregular)finiteprecisiongridoverU0,G'.If,forsome R, q(^u) has the same value for all^u∈R, then this input R uniquely specifies what αis for any associated^u. If this is not the case, then the R input to the computer does not suffice to answer question q. So for any q and region R both of which can be specified in the computer’s input, R must be a subset of a region q-1(α) for some α. Implicit in this definition is some means for correctly getting the information R into the com- puter’s input. In practice, this is often done by having had the computer coupled to S sometime beforetime0.Asanalternative,ratherthanspecifyRintheinput,wecouldhavetheinputcontain a “pointer” telling the computer where to look to get the information R. (The analysis of these papersholdsnomatterhowthecomputergainsaccesstoR.)Inaddition,inpracticetheinput,giv- ing R, q, and T, is an element of a partition over an “input section” of our computer. In such a case,theinputisitselfanelementofafiniteprecisiongridover^U,G".SoanelementofG"spec- ifies an element of G (namely q) and element of G' (namely R.) Given its input, the computer (tries to) form its prediction for αby first running the laws of physics on au0having the specified value as measured on G', according to the specified Hamilto- nian, up to the specified time T. The computer then applies q(.) to the result. Finally, it writes this prediction for αonto its output and halts. (More precisely, using some fourth finite precision grid11 G"'overitsoutputsection,it“writesout”(whatininterpretas)itspredictionforwhatregioninU the universe will be in at T, that prediction being formally equivalent to a prediction of a region in^U.) The goal is to have it do this, with the correct value of α, by time τ < T. Consider again the case where there is in fact a correct prediction, i.e., where R is indeed a subset of the region q-1(α) for some α. For this case, formally speaking, “all the computer has to do” in making its prediction is recognize which such region in the partition q that is input to the computer contains the region R that is also input to the computer. Then it must output the label of that region in q. In practice though, q and R are usually “encoded” differently, and the computer must“translate”betweenthoseencodingstorecognizewhichregionq-1(α)containsR;thistrans- lation constitutes the “computation”. Consider a conventional computer that consists of a fixed physical dynamical system together with a pair of mappings by which some of that system’s observable degrees of freedom are inter- pretedas(perhapsbinary)“inputs”,andsomeas“outputs”.Moreprecisely,certaincharacteristics of the degrees of freedom of the computer — like whether they exceed a pre-specified threshold, inthecaseofadigitalcomputer— areinterpretedthatway.Theinputandoutputdegreesoffree- domcanoverlap,andmayevenbeidentical.Sincethecomputerexistsinthephysicaluniverseits stateisspecifiedbyu.Thereforeboththeinterpretationofsomeofthecomputersdegreesoffree- domas“inputs”andsomeas“outputs”isequivalenttoamappingfromu ∈Utoaspaceofinputs and of outputs, respectively. All of this holds whether the computation of the outputs from the inputs proceeds in a “digital” or “analog” fashion. Under the convention that the initialization of the computer occurs at t = 0, since^u fixes u0 and vice-versa, we can broaden the definition of a computer’s input, to be a mapping from^u∈^U to a space of inputs. So for example “initialization” of a computer as conventionally conceived, whichsetsthet=0stateofaphysicalsystemunderlyingthecomputer,issimplyaspecialcase.In thatspecialcase,thevaluetakenbytheinputmappingcandifferfor^uand^u'onlyifthet=0state of the computer portion of the universe, as specified by^u, differs from the t = 0 state of the com-12 puter portion of the universe as specified by^u'. Similarly, under the convention that τis fixed, we can broaden the definition of a computer’s output to be a mapping from^u∈^U to a space of out- puts. We define a computer by formalizing these considerations: Definition 2: i) A (computation) partition is a set of disjoint subsets of^u whose union equals^U, or equivalently a single-valued mapping from^U into a non-empty space of partition-element labels. Unless stated otherwise, any partition is assumed to contain at least two elements. ii)In anoutput partition , the space of partition element labels is a space of possible “outputs”, {OUT}. iii)In the current context, where we are interested in prediction, we require {OUT} to be the space of all pairs {OUTq∈Q, OUTα∈A(OUTq)}, for some Q and A(.) as defined in Def. (1). This space — and therefore the associated output partition — is implicitly a function of Q. To make this explicit, often, rather than an output partition, we will consider the full associated dou- ble (Q, OUT(.)), where OUT(.) is the output partition^u∈^U→OUT∈{OUTq∈Q, OUTα∈ A(OUTq)}. Also, we will find it useful to use an output partition to define an associated (“ predic- tion”) partition, OUTp(.) :^u → (A(OUTq(^u ), OUTα(^u )). iv)In aninput partition , the space of partition element labels is a space of possible “inputs”, {IN}. v)A (physical)computer consists of an input partition and an output partition double. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, both of those partitions are required to be (separately) surjective. Since we are restricting attention to non-empty Q, {OUT} is non-empty. We say that OUTqis the “question posed to the computer”, and OUTαis “the computer’s answer”. The surjectivity of IN(.)andOUT(.)isarestrictionon{IN}and{OUT},respectively.Itreflectsthefactthat,forrea- sons of convenience, we don’t allow a value to “officially” be in the space of the computer’s potential inputs (outputs) if there is no state of the computer that corresponds to that input (out-put). For example, if the computer is a digital workstation with a kilobyte of its RAM set aside as input, it makes no sense to have the input space contain more than (28)1024 values. While motivated in large measure by the task of predicting the future, the definition of physi- cal computation is far broader, concerning any computation that can be cast in terms of inputs, questionsaboutphysicalstatesofnature,andassociatedanswers.Thissetofquestionsincludesin particular any calculation that can be instantiated in a physical system in our universe, whether that question is a “prediction” or not. All such physically realizable calculations are subject to the results presented below. Even in the context of prediction though, the definition of a physical computer presented here is much broader than computers that work by the process outlined in Ex. 1 (and therefore the associated theorems are correspondingly further-ranging in their implications). For example, the computer in Ex. 1 has the laws of physics explicitly built into its “program”. But our definition allows other kinds of “programs” as well. Our definition also allows other kinds of information inputtothecomputerbesidesqandaregionR(whichtogetherwithTconstitutetheinputsinthat example above). We will only need to require that there be somet = 0 state of the computer that, by accident or by design, induces the correct prediction at t = τ. This means we do not even requirethatthecomputer’sinitialstateIN“accuratelydescribes”thet=0externaluniverseinany meaningful sense. Our generalization of Ex.1 preserves analogues of the grids G(in Q(.)),G" (in IN(.)) and G"' (in OUT(.)), but not of the grid G'. In fact, our formal definition of a physical computer broadens what we mean by the “input to the computer”, IN, even further. While the motivation for our definition, exemplified in Ex. 1, has the partition IN(.)“fix theinitial state of thecomputer’s inputs section”, that need not be the case. IN(.) can reflect anyattributes of^u. An “input” — an element of a partition of^U — need not eveninvolvethet=0stateofthephysicalcomputer.Inotherwords,asweusethetermshere,the computer’s “input” need not be specified in some t = 0 state of a physical device. Indeed, our def- inition does not even explicitly delineate the particular physical system within the universe that we identify with the computer. (A physical computer is simply an input partition together with an14 output partition.) This means we can even choose to have the entire universe “be the computer”. For our purposes, we do not need tighter restrictions in our definition of a physical computer. Nonetheless, a pedagogically useful example is any localized physical device in the real world meetingourlimitedrestrictions.Nomatterhowthatdeviceworks,itissubjecttotheimpossibility results described below. Wecanalsomodifytheexamplepresentedaboveinotherwaysnotinvolvinginput.Forexam- ple,wecanhaveT<0,sothatthe“prediction”isofthepast.WecanalsohaveSbeopen(orper- haps even be the entire universe), etc. Although prediction of the future is an important (and pedagogically useful) special case, our results hold more generally for any calculation a physical computer might undertake. As a final example of the freedom allowed by our definition, consider again conventional computation, where both the input and output mappings reflect the state of the portion of the uni- verse consisting of some physical system underlying the computer. Now in practice we may want to physically couple such a computer to the external universe, for example via an observation apparatus that initializes the computer’s inputs so that they reflect information about the system being predicted. Such a coupling would be reflected in^u. If we wish though, we can exploit the freedom in its definition to modify the input mapping, in such a way that it too directly reflects this kind of coupling. For example, under the proposed modification, if we want the input section of the computer’s underlying physical system to be a bit b1that equals the t = -1 state of some bit b2concerning the external universe, then we could have IN(^u ) = IN(b1(u0), b2(u-1)) = b1(u0) if b1(u0)=b2(u-1),andhaveitequalaspecial“inputerror”valueotherwise.Ifwedohaveaphysical coupling mechanism, and if that mechanism is reliable — something reflected in^u — then this third setting will never occur, and we can ignore it. However use of this modified IN allows us to avoid explicitly identifying such a mechanism and simply presume its existence. So long as the third setting never occurs, we can analyze the system as though it had such a (reliable) physical coupling mechanism. We will sometimes find it useful to consider a “copy” of a particular computer C. Intuitively,15 this is any computer C' where the logical implications relating values of IN' and OUT' are the same as those relating values IN and OUT, so that both computers have the same input-output mapping. Definition 2 (v): Given a computer C ≡{Q, IN, OUT}, define the implication in {OUT} of any valueIN∈{IN}tobethesetofallOUT ∈{OUT}consistentwithIN,inthat ∃^u∈^Uforwhich bothIN(^u)=INandOUT(^u)=OUT.ThenthecomputerC2≡{Q2,IN2,OUT2}isacopyofthe computer C1≡{Q1, IN1, OUT1} iff Q2= Q1, {IN2} = {IN1}≡{IN}, {OUT2} = {OUT1}, and the implication in {OUT2} of any IN ∈{IN} is the same as the implication in {OUT1} of that IN. Note that we don’t require that IN1(.) = IN2(.) in the definition of a copy of a computer; the two computers are allowed to have different input values for the same^u. Conversely, any computer is a copy of itself, a scenario in which IN1(.) does equal IN2(.). ii) Intelligible computation Consider a “conventional” physical computer, consisting of an underlying physical system whose t = 0 state sets IN(^u ) and whose state at time τsets OUT(^u ), as in our example above. Wewishtoanalyzewhetherthephysicalsystemunderlyingthatcomputercancalculatethefuture sufficiently quickly. In doing so, we do not want to allow any of the “computational load” of the calculationtobe“hidden”inthemappingsIN(.)andOUT(.)bywhichweinterprettheunderlying physicalsystem’sstate,therebylesseningthecomputationalloadonthatunderlyingphysicalsys- tem. Stated differently, we wish both the input and the output corresponding to any state of the underlying physical system to be “immediately and readily intelligible”, rather than requiring non-trivialsubsequentcomputingbeforeitcanbeinterpreted.Aswillbeseeninourformalization of this requirement, it is equivalent to stipulating that our computer be flexible enough that there are no restrictions on the possible questions one can pose to it. One way to formalize this intelligibility constraint would entail imposing capabilities for self-16 reference onto our computer. This has the major disadvantage of restricting the set of physical computersunderconsideration.Asanalternative,toformalizethenotionthatacomputer’sinputs andoutputsbe“intelligible”,hereweconsideruniverseshavinganothercomputerwhichcancon- siderthefirstone.Wethenrequirethatthatsecondcomputerbeabletodirectlyposebinaryques- tions about whether the first computer’s prediction correctly corresponds to reality, without relying on any intervening “translational” computer to interpret that first computer. (Note that nothing is being said about whether such a question can be correctly answered by the second computer, simply whether it can be posedto that computer.) So we wish to be able to ask if that output is one particular value, whether it is another particular value, whether it is one of a certain set of values, etc. Intuitively, this means that the set Q for the second computer must contain binaryfunctionsofOUT(.)ofthefirstcomputer.Finally,wealsorequirethatthesecondcomputer be similarly intelligible to the first one. These two requirements are how we impose the intuitive requirement that both computers be “readily intelligible” as predictions concerning reality; they must be readily intelligible and checkable to each other . They are formalized and generalized as follows: Definition 3: Consider a physical computer C ≡(Q, IN(.), OUT(.)) and a^U-partition π. A func- tion from^U intoB, f, is anintelligibility function (forπ) if ∀^u,^u'∈^U,π(^u ) =π(^u' )⇒f(^u ) = f(^u' ). A set F of such intelligibility functions is an intelligibility set forπ. We view any intelligibility function as a question by defining A(f) to be the image of^U under f.IfFisanintelligibilitysetfor πandF⊆Q,wesaythat πisintelligible toCwithrespecttoF.If the intelligibility set is not specified, it is implicitly understood to be the set of all intelligibility functions for π. We say that two physical computers C1and C2aremutually intelligible (with respect to the pair{Fi})iffbothOUT2isintelligibletoC1withrespecttoF2andOUT1isintelligibletoC2with respect to F1.17 Plugging in, πis intelligible to C iff ∀intelligibility functions f, ∃q∈OUTqsuch that q = f, i.e., such that A(q) = the image of^U under f, and such that ∀^u∈^U, q(^u ) = f(^u ). Note that since π contains at least two elements, if πis intelligible to C, ∃OUTq∈{OUTq} such that A(OUTq) = B, an OUTqsuch that A(OUTq) = {0}, and one such that A(OUTq) = {1}. Usually we are inter- ested in the case where π is an output partition of a physical computer, as in mutual intelligibility. Intuitively,anintelligibilityfunctionforapartition πisamappingfromtheelementsof πinto B.πisintelligibletoCifQcontainsallbinary-valuedfunctionsof π,i.e.,ifCcanhaveposedany question concerning the universe as measured on π. This flexibility in C ensures that C’s output partitionisn’t“riggedaheadoftime”infavorofsomeparticularquestionconcerning π.Formally, by the surjectivity of OUT(.), demanding intelligibility implies that ∃^u'∈^U such that ∀^u∈^U, [OUTq(^u' )](^u ) = f(^u ). In conventional computation IN(.) specifies the question q ∈Q we want to pose to the com- puter(seetheexampleabove).Insuchscenarios,mutualintelligibilityrestrictshowmuchcompu- tationcanbe“hidden”inOUT2(.)andIN1(.)(OUT1(.)andIN2(.),respectively)bycouplingthem, so that subsets of the range of OUT2(.) are, directly, elements in the range of IN1(.), without any intervening computational processing. Moreprosaically,tomotivateintelligibilitywecansimplynotethatwewishtobeabletopose to C1any prediction question we can formulate. In particular, this means we wish to be able to pose to C1any questions concerning well-defined aspects of the future state of C2. Now consider having C2be a conventional computer based on an underlying physical system. Then we want to be able to predict C2’s output at time τas OUT2(uτ). Therefore in addition to any other questions we might want to be able to pose to it, we want to be able to pose to C1questions involving the value OUT2(uτ) (e.g., is that value x1? x1or x2? x1or x3? etc.). This is equivalent to requiring intelligibility. iii) Predictable computation18 We can now formalize the concept of a physical computer’s “making a correct prediction” concerning another computer’s future state. We do this as follows: Definition 4: Consider a physical computer C, partition π, and intelligibility set for π, F. We say thatπ isweakly predictable to C with respect to F iff: i)π is intelligible to C with respect to F, i.e., F ⊆OUTq ; ii)∀ f∈F,∃IN∈{IN} that weakly induces f, i.e., an IN such that: IN(^u) = IN ⇒ OUTp(^u) = (A(OUTq(^u )), OUTα(^u )) = (A(f) ,f(^u)). Intuitively,condition(ii)meansthatforallquestionsqinF,thereisaninputstatesuchthatifCis initialized to that input state, C’s answer to that question q (as evaluated at τ) must be correct. We will say a computer C' with output OUT'(.) is weakly predictable to another if the partition OUT'p(.) is. If we just say “predictable” it will be assumed that we mean weak predictability. This definition of predictable is extremely weak. It only concerns those q ∈Q that are in F. Also, it doesn’t even require that there be a sense in which the information input to C is interpret- able as a description of the external universe. (This freedom is what allows us to avoid formaliz- ing the concept of whether some input does or does not “correctly describe” the external universe.) Furthermore, even if the input is interpretable that way, we don’t require that it be cor- rect.Asanexampleofthis,asinconventionalcomputation{IN}couldconsistofspecificationsof t = 0 states of some system S whose future we want to predict, i.e., IN(.) maps the t = 0 state of a physical system underlying our computer to the space of possible t = 0 states of S. But nothing in the definition of ‘predictable’ requires that IN(^u )correctly specifies the values of those initial conditions of S; all that matters is that the resulting prediction be correct. Indeed, we don’t even require that OUTq(^u ) = q. Even if the computer gets confused about what question it’s answer- ing,wegiveitcreditifitcomesupwiththecorrectanswertoourquestion.Inaddition,wedonot19 even require that the value IN uniquely fixes OUTα(^u ). There may be two^u’s both consistent withINthatnonethelesshavedifferentOUTα(^u)(andthereforecorrespondtodifferentvaluesof q). Finally,notethatnoneofthetimes0, τorToccurinthedefinitionof‘predictable’orinanyof thetermsgoingintothatdefinition.Althoughwemotivatedthedefinitionasawaytoanalyzepre- diction of the future, it actually encompasses a much broader range of kinds of computation. So although our results below do govern prediction of the future, they have many other ramification as well. Most generally, they govern issues concerning sets of potential properties of the uni- verse’s history. In particular, they govern whether one can always restrict that history together with the state of a “computer”, itself specified in that history, so that that computer correctly guesseswhichofthepropertiesactuallyholds.(Inthis,althoughitispedagogicallyhelpful,useof the term “prediction” is a bit misleading.) Even when there is temporal ordering of inputs, outputs, and the prediction involved in the computation, they need nothave T> τ>0. We could just as easily haveT < τ< 0 or even T< 0 < τ. So the results presented below will establish the uncomputability of the past as well as of the future. They also can be viewed as establishing the fallibility of any observation apparatus and of any control apparatus. These points will be returned to below. Asaformalmatter,notethatinthedefinitionofpredictable,eventhoughf(.)issurjectiveonto A(f) (cf. Def. 3), it may be that for some IN, the set of values f(^u ) takes on when^u is restricted sothatIN(^u)=INdonotcoverallofA(f).Thereadershouldalsobearinmindthatbysurjectiv- ity,∀IN∈{IN},∃^u∈^U such that IN(^u ) = IN. iv) Distinguishable computers There is one final definition that we need before we can establish our unpredictability results. In our analysis below we will need to have a formal definition of what we mean by having two separatephysicalcomputers.Thebasicideabehindthisdefinitionisthatjustaswerequirethatall input values IN ∈{IN} are physically realizable states of a single physical computer, so all pairs20 of the two computer’s inputs values must be physically realizable states of the two physical com- puters. Intuitively, the computers are not so intertwined that how we can initialize one of them is determined by how we initialize the other. We formalize this as follows: Definition 5: Consider a set of n physical computers {Ci≡(Qi, INi(.), OUTi(.)) : i = 1, ..., n}. We say {Ci} is (input)distinguishable iff∀n-tuples (IN1∈{IN1}, ..., INn∈{INn}),∃^u∈^U such that∀ i, INi(^u ) = INi simultaneously. We say that {Ci} ispairwise(input)distinguishable if any pair of computers from {Ci} is distin- guishable, and will sometimes say that any two such computers C1and C2“are distinguishable from each other”. We will also say that {Ci} is amaximal (pairwise) distinguishable set if there are no physical computers C ∉ {Ci} such that C ∪ {Ci} is a (pairwise) distinguishable set. 2. THE UNCOMPUTABILITY OF THE FUTURE i) The impossibility of posing arbitrary questions to a computer Our first result does not even concern the accuracy of prediction. It simply states that for any pair of physical computers there are alwaysbinary-valued questions about the state of the uni- verse that cannot even be posed to at least one of those physical computers. In particular, this is trueifthesecondcomputerisacopyofthefirstone,orevenifitisthesameasthefirstone.(The result does not rely on input-distinguishability of the two computers — a property that obviously does not describe the relationship between a computer and itself.) This impossibility holds no matterwhatthecardinalityofthesetofquestionsthatcanbeposedtothecomputers(i.e.,nomat- ter what the cardinality of {IN} and/or Q). It is also true no matter how powerful the computers (andinparticularholdsevenifthecomputersaremorepowerfulthanaTuringMachine),whether the computers are analog or digital, whether the universe is classical or quantum-mechanical,21 whetherornotthecomputersarequantumcomputers,andevenwhetherthecomputersaresubject to physical constraints like the speed of light. In addition the result does not rely on chaotic dynamics in any manner. All that is required is that the universe contain two (perhaps identical, perhaps wildly different) physical computers. Theorem 1: Consider any pair of physical computers {Ci: i = 1, 2}. Either ∃finite intelligibility set F2for C2such that C2is not intelligible to C1with respect to F2, and/or∃finite intelligibility set F1 for C1 such that C1 is not intelligible to C2 with respect to F1. Proof:Hypothesize that the theorem is false. Then C1and C2are mutually intelligible ∀finite F1 and F2. Now the set of all finite F2includes any and all intelligibility functions for C2, i.e., any and all functions taking^u to a bit whose value is set by the value OUT2(^u ). The set of those functionscanbebijectivelymappedtothepowerset2{OUT2}.SoF2⊆Q1⇒o(Q1)≥o(2{OUT2}). However o({OUT2})≥o(Q2), since {OUT2} contains all possible specifications of a q2∈Q2. Therefore o(Q1)≥o(2Q2). But it is always true that o(2A) > o(A) for any set A, which means in particular that o(2Q2) > o(Q2). Accordingly, o(Q1) > o(Q2). Similarly though, o(Q2) > o(Q1). Therefore o(Q1) > o(Q1), which is impossible. QED. Ultimately, Thm. 1 holds due to our requiring that our physical computer be capable of answering more than one kind of question about the future state of the universe. To satisfy this requirement q cannot be pre-fixed. (In conventional computation, it is specified in the computer’s input.) But precisely because q is not fixed, for the computer’s output of αto be meaningful it must be accompanied by specification of q; the computer’s output must be a well-defined region in^U. It is this need to specify q as well as α, ultimately, which means that one cannot have two physical computers both capable of being asked arbitrary questions concerning the output of the other. Thm.1reflectsthefactthatwhilewedonotwanttohaveC’soutputpartition“riggedaheadof22 time” in favor of some single question, we also cannot require too much flexibility of our com- puter. It is necessary to balance these two considerations. Before analyzing prediction of the future,tocircumventThm.1wemustdefinearestrictedkindofintelligibilitysettowhichThm.1 doesnotapply.Thisisasetoffunctionswhosevaluedoesnotdependonthequestioncomponent of OUT, only on the answer component. Intuitively, restricting ourselves to these kinds of intelli- gibility sets means we are only requiring that the predicted partition labelof one physical com- puter be directly readable on the other computer’s input, not that the full partition of the first computer’s question also be directly readable. Recall that for any f that is an intelligibility function for (the output partition of) some com- puterC,∀^u,^u'∈^U,OUT(^u)=OUT(^u')impliesthatf(^u)=f(^u').Soforsuchanf,thejoint condition[OUTq(^u)= OUTq(^u')] ^ [OUTα(^u )=OUTα(^u')]implies thatf(^u) =f(^u' ).We consider f’s that obey weaker conditions: Definition 6: An intelligibility function f for an output partition OUT(.) is question-independent iff∀^u,^u'∈^U: OUTp(^u ) = OUTp(^u' ) ⇒ f(^u ) = f(^u' ). An intelligibility set as a whole is question-independent if all its elements are. We write C1> C2(or equivalently C2< C1) and say simply that C2is (weakly) predictable to C1(orequivalentlythatC1canpredict C2)ifC2isweaklypredictabletoC1forallquestion-inde- pendent finite intelligibility sets for C2. Similarly, from now on we will say that C2isintelligible to C1without specification of an intelligibility set if C2is intelligible to C1with respect to all question-independent finite intelligi- bility sets for C2. Intuitively,fisquestion-independentifitsvaluedoesnotvarywithqamonganysetofqallof23 which share the same A(q). As an example, say our physical computer is a conventional digital workstation. Have a certain section of the workstation’s RAM be designated the “output section” ofthatworkstation.Thatoutputsectionisfurtherdividedintoa“questionsubsection”designating (i.e.,“containing”)aq,andan“answersubsection”designatingan α.Saythatforallqthatcanbe designated by the question subsection A(q) is a single bit, i.e., we are only interested in binary- valued questions. Then for a question-independent f, the value of f can only depend on whether the answer subsection contains a 0 or a 1. It cannot vary with the contents of the question subsec- tion. As a formal example of question-independent intelligibility, say our computer has questions q for which A(q) = B, questions q for which A(q) = {0}, and q for which A(q) = {1}, but no others. Then there are four distinct subsets of^U, which mutually cover^U, defined by the four equations OUTp(^u)=(B,1),OUTp(^u)=(B,0),OUTp(^u)=({1},1),andOUTp(^u)=({0},0).(Thefull partition OUT(.) is a refinement of this 4-way partition, whereas this 4-way partition need not have no relation with the partitions making up each q in Q.) So a question-independent intelligi- bility function of our computer is any B-valued function of which of these four subsets a particu- lar^u falls into. In terms of the first of the motivations we introduced for requiring intelligibility, requiring question-independent intelligibility means we only require each computer’s answerto be readily intelligible to the other one. We are willing to forego having the question that each computer thinks it’s answering also be readily intelligible to the other one. Alternatively, we can define a “partialcomputer”asamodifiedkindofcomputerwhosevariableOUTisonlyA(q)and α(rather than q and α). Intelligibility in the sense originally defined, applied to a partial computer, is exactly equivalent to applying question-independent intelligibility to a full computer. In particu- lar, the set of all question-independent intelligibility functions of any output partition OUT(.) equals the set of all intelligibility functions of the partial computer output partition OUTp(.). Thm. 1 does nothold ifwe restrictattention to question-independent intelligibility sets. Asan example, both of our computers could have their output answer subsections be a single bit, and24 both could have their Q contain all four Boolean questions about the state of the other computer’s output answer bit. (Those are the following functions from^u∈^U→B: Is u such that the other computer’s output bit is 1? 0? 1 and/or 0? Neither 1 nor 0?) So the Q of both computers contains all possible question-independent intelligibility sets for the other computer. The following example establishes that there are pairs of input-distinguishable physical com- puters {C1, C2} in which C2is predictable to C1: Example 2: Q2consists of a single question, one which is a binary partition of^U so that A(OUT2 q(^u )) =Balways. Since OUT2(.) is surjective, the image of^U under OUT2 α(.) is all of B.Q1hasfourelementsgivenbythefourlogicalfunctionsofthebitOUT2 α(^u).(Notetheseare the four intelligibility functions for C2.) Have IN1(.) = OUT1 q(.), so that {IN1} contains four ele- ments corresponding to those four possible questions concerning OUT2 α. Next, have OUT1 α(^u ) = [OUT1 q(^u )](^u )∀^u∈^U. Then for any of the four intelligibility functions for C2, q,∃IN1∈ {IN1} such that IN1(^u ) = IN1⇒[A(OUT1 q(^u )) = A(q)] ^ [OUT1 α(^u )=q(^u )]; simply choose IN1= q, so that IN1(^u ) = IN1⇒OUT1 q(^u ) = q. Finally, to ensure distinguishability, if there are multiple IN2values, have each one occur for at least one^u in each of the subregions of^U given by the partition IN1(.). ToensuresurjectivityofOUT1(.),wecouldhaveIN1(.)subdivideeachofthetwosets(oneset for each value of OUT2 α) {^u∈^U : OUT2 α(^u ) = OUT2 α} into four non-empty subregions, one foreachIN1value.So(IN1(^u),OUT2 α(^u))aretwo-dimensionalcoordinatesofasetofdisjoint regions that form a rectangular array covering^U. This means that^u→(IN1(^u ), OUT2 α(^u )) is surjective onto {IN1}×{OUT2 α}, so that for any OUT1 αand intelligibility function for C2, q, there is always a value of IN1that both induces the correct prediction for that function q and is consistent with that OUT2 α. The following variant of Ex. 2 establishes that we could have yet another computer C3that predicts C2 but that is also distinguishable from C1:25 Example 2': Have Q3= Q1, {IN3} = {IN1}, OUT3 q(.) = IN3(.), OUT3 α(^u ) = [OUT3 q(^u )](^u ) ∀^u∈^U,andhaveIN3(.)subdivideIN1(.)sothatallfourvaluesofIN3canoccurwitheachvalue of IN1. In general, as we vary over all^u∈^U and therefore over all (IN1, IN3) pairs, the pair of intelligibilityfunctionthatC1ispredictingwillseparatelyvaryfromthosethatC3ispredicting,in such a way that all 24pairs of intelligibility functions for C2are answered correctly for some^u ∈^U. Inaddition,wecanhaveacomputerC4,distinguishablefrombothC1andC2,whereC4>C1, so that C4> C1> C2. We can do this either with C4> C2or not, as the following variant of Ex. 2 demonstrates: Example 2": Have OUT4 q(.) = IN4(.), OUT4 α(^u ) = [OUT4 q(^u )](^u )∀^u∈^U, and {IN4} = {OUT4 q} equals the set of all 24question-independent intelligibility functions for C1. (There are four possible OUT1 p: {({0}, 0), ({1}, 1), ( B, 0), (B, 1)}.) Ensure surjectivity of OUT4(.) by hav- ing each region of constant OUT4 q(^u ) overlap each region of constant OUT1 p(^u ).This estab- lishes that C4> C1. Distinguishability would then hold if IN4(.) subdivides IN1(.) so that all 16 values of IN4 can occur with each value of IN1. In this setup, C2may or may not be predictable to C4. To see how it may not be, consider the casewhere{IN2}isasingleelement(sodistinguishabilitywithC2isneveranissue).HaveIN4(.) be a refinement of OUT2 α(.), in that each IN4value can only occur with one or the other of the twoOUT2 αvalues.SoeachIN4valuedelineatesa“horizontalstrip”ofconstantOUT2 α(^u),run- ning across all four values of IN1(^u ). (Since IN1(^u ) = OUT1 q(^u ), and OUT1 α(^u ) = (OUT1 q(^u ))(^u ), OUT1 α(^u ) = (IN1(^u ))(^u ), so specifying the value of IN1(^u ) specifies OUT1 p(^u ), and each strip crosses all four OUT1 p values, as was stipulated above.) NowchoosethestripwithA(OUT4 q(^u))=A(IN4(^u))={0}tohavecoordinateOUT2 α(^u) = 1, and the strip with A(OUT4 q(^u )) = {1} to have coordinate OUT2 α(^u ) = 0. In the remaining26 fourteen strips, OUT4 α(^u ) is not constant, and therefore is not a single-valued intelligibility function of the associated (constant) value of OUT2 p(^u ). In both of those two strips though, OUT4 α(^u)istheoppositeofOUT2 α(^u).SonoIN4valueinducestheidentityquestion-indepen- dent intelligibility function for C2:^u→ ΟUT2 α(^u), i.e., no IN4induces OUT4 p(^u ) = (B, OUT2 α(^u )). Accordingly, C4 does not predict C2. In other instances though, both C2and C1are predictable to C4. To have this we need only subdivide {IN4} and {OUT4} into two portions, ({IN4}A, {OUT4}A), and ({IN4}B, {OUT4}B), which divide^U in two. The first of these portions is used for predictions concerning C2, as in Ex. 2; each region of constant IN4(^u ) is a subset of a region of constant IN1(^u ) overlapping both OUT2 α(^u ). The second is used for predictions concerning C1, as just above. It consists of hori- zontalstripsextendingoverthatpartof^UnottakenupbytheregionswithIN4(^u)∈{IN4}A.So {IN4}A= {OUT4 q}Acontains four elements, and {IN4}B= {OUT4 q}Bcontains sixteen, which means that {IN} = {OUT} contains twenty elements, all told. Distinguishability is ensured by havingIN4takeonallitspossiblevalueswithinanysubsetof^UoverwhichbothIN1(.)andIN2(.) are constant. ii) The impossibility of assuredly correct prediction Even if we can pose all the questions in some set to a computer, that says nothing about whether by appropriate choice of input the computer can always be assured of correctly answer- inganyquestionfromthatset.Infact,evenifwerestrictattentiontoquestion-independentintelli- gibility sets, no physical computer can be assuredly correct in its predictions concerning the future. Whereas the impossibility expressed by Thm. 1 follows from cardinality arguments and the power set nature of intelligibility sets, the impossibility of assuredly correct prediction follows from the presence of the negation operator in a (question-independent) intelligibility set. As an exampleofthelogicunderlyingtheproof,considerapairofcomputerspredictingthefuture,both ofwhoseoutputanswersubsectionsarebinary.Haveoneofthetwocomputerspredicttheother’s27 output bit, whereas that other computer predicts the negation of the first one’s output bit. Since both computers’ output calculations must halt by τ, they will contradict each other when the pre- diction time arrives. Therefore they cannot both be correct in their predictions. To formalize this, first note that for any partition πcontaining at least two elements, there exists an intelligibility function f for πwith A(f) = B, an intelligibility function f with A(f) = {1}, andanintelligibilityfunctionfwithA(f)={0}.Byexploitingthesurjectivityofoutputpartitions, we can extend this result to concern such partitions. This is formally established in the following lemma, which holds whether or not we assume partitions are binary: Lemma 1: Consider a physical computer C1. If∃any output partition OUT2that is intelligible to C1, then∃q1∈Q1such that A(q1) =B, a q1∈Q1such that A(q1) = {0}, and a q1∈Q1such that A(q1) = {1}. Proof:Since {OUT2} is non-empty, {OUT2 q} is non-empty. Pick some q*∈{OUT2 q} having at least two elements. (By definition of physical computer, there is at least one such q*.) Construct any binary-valued function f*2ofα ∈A(q*) such that there exists at least one αfor which f*2(α) =0andatleastoneforwhichf*2(α)=1.Defineanassociatedfunctionf*2(^u)=f*2(OUT2 α(^u)) ifA(OUT2 q(^u))=A(q*),0otherwise.BythesurjectivityofOUT2(.),∀α∈A(q*),∃^usuchthat bothOUT2 q(^u)=q*andOUT2 α(^u)=α.Therefore ∃^usuchthatf*2(^u)=1,and ∃^usuchthat f*2(^u ) = 0. This establishes, by construction, that there is a question-independent intelligibility function for C2that takes on both the value 1 and the value 0, f*2. So by our hypothesis that C2is intelligi- bletoC1withrespecttoanyquestion-independentintelligibilityfunctionforC2,weknowthatf*2 ∈Q1. Moreover, viewed as a question, A(f*2) =B. So, we have established that Q1contains a binary valued function. Next, note that the function^u∈^U→1 is always a question-independent intelligibility func- tion for C2, as is the function^u∈^U→0. Again using surjectivity, we see that A for these two28 functions are {1} and {0}, respectively. QED. We can now establish our central theorem: Theorem 2 : Consider any pair of distinguishable physical computers {Ci: i = 1, 2}. It is not pos- sible that both C1 > C2 and C1 < C2. Proof:Hypothesize that the theorem is false. Then C1and C2are mutually predictable for all pairs of question-independent intelligibility functions (one function for each computer), and therefore mutually intelligible for them as well. Therefore Lemma 1 applies. Using the surjectiv- ity of OUT2(.), this means that ∃q2∈Q2such that A(q2) =Band such that there both exists a^u ∈^U such that OUT2(^u ) = (q2, 0) and a^u∈^U such that OUT2(^u ) = (q2, 1). By similar reason- ing,∃q1∈Q1suchthatA(q1)=B,andsuchthattherebothexistsa^u∈^UsuchthatOUT1(^u)= (q1, 0) and a^u∈^U such that OUT1(^u ) = (q1, 1). Considerthefunctionof^u∈^Uwhosevalueis1ifOUT2 p(^u)=(B,1),0otherwise.Likeq1, this is a question-independent intelligibility function for C2, and by our argument just above, we knowitissurjectiveonto B.Againusingmutualintelligibility,thisintelligibilityfunctionisaq ∈ Q1, q*1. Intuitively, this q for C1is just the bit of C2’s output answer, for those cases where that answerisbinary.(Ourprovingsurjectivityestablishesthatthereactuallyaresuchcaseswherethe space of answers is binary, and furthermore that among such cases both output answers arise.) Similarly, ∃q∈Q2,q*2,suchthatq*2(^u)=1ifOUT1 p(^u)=(B,0),1otherwise.Intuitively,this q for C2 is just the negation of the bit of C1’s output answer. By hypothesis our computers are mutually predictable with respect to any two finite intelligi- bility sets. Therefore they are mutually predictable with respect to the two (single-element) intel- ligibility sets for C2and C1, q*1, and q*2, respectively. Therefore ∃IN2such that IN2(^u ) = IN2 implies that OUT2 p(^u ) = (B, q*2(^u )). Similarly, ∃IN1such that IN1(^u ) = IN1implies that OUT1 p(^u)=(B,q*1(^u)).Butsinceourcomputersareinput-distinguishable, ∃^uforwhichboth29 IN2(^u)=IN2andIN1(^u)=IN1.Therefore ∃^uforwhichA(OUT2 q(^u))=A(OUT1 q(^u))=B, OUT2 α(^u ) = q*2(^u ), and OUT1 α(^u ) = q*1(^u ). Pluggingin,forthat^u,A(OUT2 q(^u))=B,andOUT2 α(^u)=1ifOUT1 p(^u)=(B,0),1oth- erwise. Similarly, A(OUT1 q(^u )) =B, and OUT1 α(^u ) = 1 if OUT2 p(^u ) = (B, 1), 0 otherwise. Plugging in again, we have OUT2 α(^u ) = 1 if OUT2 α(^u )≠1, 0 otherwise. This contradiction establishes that our hypothesis is wrong, which establishes the theorem. QED. Restating it, Thm. 2 says that either ∃finite question-independent intelligibility set for C1, F1, suchthatC1isnotpredictabletoC2withrespecttoF1,and/or∃finitequestion-independentintel- ligibility set for C2, F2, such that C2 is not predictable to C1 with respect to F2. Thm. 2 holds no matter how large and powerful our computers are; it even holds if the “phys- icalsystemunderlying”oneorbothofourcomputersisthewholeuniverse.Italsoholdsifinstead C2istherestofthephysicaluniverseexternaltoC1.Asaparticularinstanceofthislattercase,the theorem holds even if C1and C2are physically isolated from each other ∀t > 0. (Results similar to Thm. 2 that rely on physical coupling between the computers are presented in [30].) Rather than viewing it as imposing limits on computers, Thm. 2 can instead be viewed as imposing limits on the computational capabilities of the universe as a whole. In this perspective that theorem establishes that the universe cannot support parallel computation in which all the nodes are sufficiently powerful to correctly predict each other’s behavior. iii) Implications of the impossibility of assuredly correct prediction for a single computer Let C be a computer supposedly capable of correctly predicting the future of any system S if information concerning the initial state of S is provided to C, as in example 1 above. Assume that C is not so powerful that the universe is incapable of supporting a copy of C in addition to the original. (This is certainly true of any C conceivably built by humans.) Have S be such a copy of C.Weassumethatforanypairoft=0inputvalues,thereisatleastoneworld-lineoftheuniverse inwhichC’sinputisoneofthosevaluesandtheothervalueconstitutestheinputofC’scopy(i.e.,30 we have input-distinguishability). ApplyingThm.1toourtwocomputers,weseethatthereisafiniteintelligibilitysetthatisnot intelligible to C, i.e., there are questions concerning an S that cannot even be posed to C. (More formally, there is either such a set for C or for its copy, S.) In addition, by Thm. 2, there is a finite question-independent (and therefore potentially pose-able) intelligibility set concerning S that is not predictable to C. In other words, there must be a question-independent intelligibility function concerningSthatCpredictsincorrectly,nomatterwhattheinputtoC(assumingthefunctioncan even be posed to C at all). ThebinarypartitionoverUTinducedbythisunpredictableintelligibilityfunctionconstitutesa question concerning the time T state of S. In addition every one of the set of potential inputs to C corresponds to a subset of U0, and therefore corresponds to a subset of the possible states of C’s “input section” at time 0. (In Ex. 1, IN(.) is set up so that every element in {IN} corresponds to one and only one state of C’s input section at time 0.) Similarly, every output of C corresponds to a subset of Uτand therefore a subset of the possible states of C’s “output section” at time τ. Accordingly, our result means that there is no input to C at time 0 that will result in C’s output at timeτhaving the correct answer to our question concerning the time T state of S. For 0 < τ< T, this constitutes a formal proof that no computer can predict the future faster than it occurs. (Or more precisely, that the universe cannot support more than one such computer.) As mentioned previously,theresultalsoholdsforT<0however,inwhichcaseitdeniesthepossibilityofassur- edly correct prediction of the past. While these results hold if C and S are isolated from one another ∀t > 0, they also hold if C and S are coupled at such times. Indeed, they hold no matter what the form of such coupling. So inparticular,wecanhaveSbeacopyofCthatiscoupledwiththeoriginalbyhavingthatoriginal “observe”thecopy’soutputsection.Doingthis,ourresultestablishestheimpossibilityofadevice C that can take specification of any characteristic of the universe as input, observe the value of that characteristic, then report that value and have the value still be true at the time of reporting. (Note that when a computer is used for observation, its input will in general not uniquely fix its31 output, unlike the case with prediction discussed in Ex. 1.) This impossibility holds independent ofconsiderationsoflight-conesandthelike,andinfactholdsjustaswellinauniversewithc= ∞ asitdoesinours.(Alternatively,thetimeatwhichthecharacteristicistobeobservedcanbespec- ifiedinthecomputer’sinput,andthereforecanbefarenoughintothefuturesothatC’slight-cone can intersect with that of the characteristic.) In all this, Thm. 2 establishes the impossibility of a general-purpose observation apparatus. Moreover, there is nothing in the math that forces C to play a “passive observational role” in the coupling with S. So we can just as well view Thm. 2 as establishing the impossibility of an apparatuscapableofensuringthatthereisnodiscrepancybetweenthetimeTvalueinsomephys- ical computer C’s output section and an associated characteristic of a system S external to C. There is no such thing as an infallible general-purpose controller. Whetherusedforprediction,observation,orcontrol,onecan“start”ourcomputeratanytime beforet=0(i.e.,givethecomputerapotentiallysemi-infinite“runningstart”)andourimpossibil- ity results still hold. In addition, it is worth noting that in the context of prediction or observation, these impossibility results hold even if one tries to have the input to the computer explicitly con- tains the correct value of the prediction or observation. (Since the universe is single-valued / deterministic,suchavaluemustexist.)Impossibilityalsoobtainsiftheinputisstochastic(sinceit holds for each input value individually). Similarly, although we are primarily interested in com- puters that run programs which were specifically designed to try to achieve our computational task, nothing in the theorem requires this. Whatever the program , our result shows that the com- puter it runs on must have output which never equals the correct answer. Thm. 2 applies even if we consider human beings, perhaps individually or in a group, perhaps using physical computational aids, perhaps building special-purpose physical devices, to be the “underlyingphysicalcomputers”.Eveninaclassical,non-chaotic,finiteuniverse,therecannotbe two scientists both of whom are infallible in their calculations (or even their observations) con- cerning the universe. This is even true if we accept Penrose’s thesis that somehow quantum grav- ity imbues human beings with extraordinary computational powers. No restrictions are set in the32 theorem on how the computer operates, and there are no explicit assumptions about the computa- tional power of either the computer or of the universe. Indeed, even if the computer is infinitely fast and/or dense, or powerful enough to solve the Halting Problem, the theorem still holds. Impossibility results that are in some senses even stronger than those associated with Thm. 2 hold when we do not restrict ourselves to distinguishable computers, as we do in Thm. 2. For example, some of those results establish the impossibility of a computer C’s assuredly prediction even if C is so powerful that the universe is not capable of having more than one copy of C. See the discussion in the next paper of prediction complexity. FUTURE WORK AND DISCUSSION Any results concerning physical computation should, at a minimum, apply to the computer lying on a scientist’s desk. However that computer is governed by the mathematics of determinis- tic finite automata, not that of Turing machines. In particular, the impossibility results concerning Turingmachinesrelyoninfinitestructuresthatdonotexistsinanycomputeronascientist’sdesk. Accordingly, it is hard to see why those results should be relevant to a general theory of physical computers. On the other hand, when one carefully analyzes actual computers that perform calculations concerning the physical world, one uncovers a mathematical structure governing those computers that is replete with its own impossibility results. While much of that structure parallels Turing machine theory, much of it has no direct analogue in that theory. For example, it has no need for structures like tapes, moveable heads, internal states, read/write capabilities, and the like, none of which have any obvious importance to the laws of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Indeed, when the underlying concepts are stripped down to their essentials, one does not even need to identify a “computer” with a particular localized region of space-time, never mind one with heads and the like. In place of all those concepts, one has several partitions over the space of all worldlines of the universe. Those partitions constitutes a computer’s inputs, the questions it is33 addressing,anditsoutputs.Theimpossibilityresultsofphysicalcomputationconcerntherelation of those partitions. Computers in the conventional, space-time localized sense (the box on your desk)aresimplyspecialexamples,withlotsofextrarestrictionsthatareunnecessaryintheunder- lying mathematics; the general definition of a “physical computer” has no such restrictions. One can use this definition of a physical computer to establish many restrictions on what is and is not possible to compute concerning the physical world. The first result is that there cannot beacomputertowhichonecanevenposeallpossiblequestionsconcerningthephysicalworld.In light of this result attention is restricted to a subset of questions, all of whose members can actu- ally be posed to physical computers. Consideration is then focussed on computers that are not so powerful as to be unique, i.e., computers that can exist in multiple renditions in the physical uni- verse. It is shown that no such computer can correctly answer all of the computational questions concerning the physical universe that can be posed to it. This central result has many implications. The first is that it is impossible for a computer to takeastateofanysystemasaninput,andthenalwayscorrectlypredictthefuturestateofthatsys- tem before it occurs. There must be mistakes made. Loosely speaking, this means that Laplace was wrong: even if the universe were a giant clock, he would not be able to reliably predict its future state before it occurred, no matter how smart he was. Phrased differently, regardless of noiselevelsand thedimensionsand other characteristicsof theunderlyingattractorsofthephysi- cal dynamics of various, there cannot be a time-series prediction algorithm [8] that is always cor- rect in its prediction of the future state of such systems. The central result follows solely from the relations among the partitions that jointly specify anyphysicalcomputer.Inparticular,itdoesnotrelyonphysicalpropertiesoftheuniverse,likeits quantum nature, the finiteness of the speed of light, the chaotic state of its subcomponents, or the like. Nor does it make any assumptions concerning a localized physical that may underlie the physical computer, the Chomsky hierarchy characterization of the computer, or the like. One can exploit this breadth of the definition of “computer” to extend the central result to address many other scenarios besides time-series prediction. In particular, that definition places no restrictions on whether the computer and the system it is predicting are physically coupled. Accordingly, that central result means that one cannot build a general-purpose observation device that always cor-34 rectly answers an observational question concerning an arbitrary physical system. Similarly, because of the freedom to have the “computer” be coupled to the external system, the central result means that one cannot build a general-purpose infallible control device, i.e., one able to induce a desired state in any specified physical system. These two corollaries of the central result holds independent of concerns about causal relations and light cones; it holds even for an infinite speed of light. Thecentralresultservesasoneofthefoundationsforamathematicsofhowsetsofcomputers can be related to one another. For example, say we loosen the assumption that any computer that can exist in our universe can exist in more than rendition. Then the central result can be used to establish that the computability relationship among all computers constitutes a directed acyclic graph. In addition, there is at most one computer that can correctly compute arbitrary questions concerning all others, i.e., that can infallibly predict/observe/control all others. In addition to ana- lyzing the mathematics associated with such “god computers”, one can investigate analogues of theHaltingtheoremofconventionalcomputerscience.Thatinvestigationresultsinanaturalcom- plexity measure, one that is analogous to algorithmic information complexity. Unlike algorithmic information complexity however, the physical computation analogue is uniquely defined, with no freedom analogous to that in algorithmic information complexity of varying the underlying uni- versalTuringmachine.Alltheseissuesandmanyothersarediscussedinthesecondofthispairof papers. Future work related to the central result includes investigating the following issues: i) How must the definitions and associated results be modified for analog computers (so that one isconcernedwithamountsoferrorratherthanwhetherthereisanerror)?Whataboutifoneiscal- culatingthefuturestateofastochasticsystem,i.e.,ifoneispredictingaprobabilitydistribution? ii)Arethereanymodificationstothedefinitionsthatwouldbemoreappropriateforquantumsys- tems? If so, how are the ensuing results different for quantum systems? (As an example of such a modification, one might want to allow sufficient time between T and τto not run into difficulties due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.)35 iii) How are the results modified if one is concerned with probabilities of erroneous prediction ratherthanjustworst-caseanalysisofwhethertherecanpossiblybeerroneousprediction?Inpar- ticular, how must the results be modified if prediction doesn’t involve a bit of whether the uni- verse’s actual worldline is or isn’t in some particular subset of all such worldlines (a partition element), but instead involves full-blown probability distributions over the full set of all world- lines? iv)Findtheexactpointoffailure —whichaccordingto(1)and(2)mustexist— oftheintuitive argument “If the computer is simply a sufficiently large and fast Hamiltonian evolution approxi- mator, then it can emulate any finite classical non-chaotic system”. v) A related issue is whether any time a computer actually tries to perform a computation of the sort invoked in the proofs of (1) and (2) it is forced to a chaotic trajectory, even though evolution of the combined C-A system in the overall phase space isn’t chaotic (i.e., the region of that phase space with positive Lyaponov exponent has measure 0)? Or is it perhaps instead the case that the only kinds of computers one might nominate as capable of predicting any external system are themselves everywhere chaotic? If this were the case, then in both the proof of (1) and of (2), one is trying to predict a chaotic system; might that be the answer to the question in (iv) of why those predictions must be in error? (As an aside, note that if it were the case that only chaotic systems could conceivably function as universal predictors it would rule out the possibility of 100% effi- cient error-correcting computers as such universal predictors, since they are designed to not be chaotic.) There are reasons to believe this is not the case. For example, the results in this paper don’t simply say that the computer is unreliable, sometimes getting the correct answer, sometimes the wrong answer. Rather those results say that there is a scenario where the computer is always wrong. This makes it hard to see how the “explanation” for these results could lie in chaotic or36 quantummechanicalpropertiesofthecomputers-onewouldexpectsuchpropertiestogiveunre- liability, not reliable incorrectness. vi) As mentioned in the introduction, there is a large body of work showing how to embed TM’s in physical systems. One topic for future work is following an analogous program in the domain of physical computation, for example by investigating what physical systems support copies of any element of various sets of physical computers. FOOTNOTES [1] To “remember”, in the present, an event from the past, formally means “predicting” that event accurately(i.e.,retrodictingtheevent),usingonlyinformationfromthepresent.Suchretrodiction relies crucially on the second law. Hence, the temporal asymmetry of the second law causes the temporalasymmetryofmemory(werememberthepast,notthefuture).Thatasymmetryofmem- ory in turn causes the temporal asymmetry of the psychological arrow of time. “Memory systems theory” refers to the associated physics of retrodiction; it is the thermodynamic analysis of sys- tems for transferring information from the past to the present. See [28]. REFERENCES [1] Adami, C. and Cerf, N.J. (2000). Physica D. 137, pp. 62-69. [2] Bennett, C.H. (1973). IBM Journal of Research and Development, 17, 525-532. [3] Bennett, C. H. (1982). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 905.37 [4] Bennett, C. H. (1987). Scientific American. 257 (11), 88. [5] Bennett, C. H. (1988). IBM Journal of Research and Development, 32 (no. 1), 16-24. [6] Berger, J. (1990), International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 29, no. 9, 985-995. [7] da Costa, N., and Doria, F. (1991). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 30, 1041. [8] Farmer, J., and Sidorowich, J. (1988). Exploiting chaos to predict the future and reduce noise, Los Alamos Laboratory report LA-UR-88-901. [9] Feynman, R. (1986). Foundations of Physics, 16, 507. [10] Fredkin, E., and Toffoli, T. (1982). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 219. [11] Gell-Mann, M., and Lloyd, S. (1996). Complexity, 2, pp. 44-52. [12] Geroch, R., Hartle, J. (1986). Foundations of Physics, 16, 533. [13] Kanter, I. (1990). Physical Review Letters. 64. 332. [14] Landauer, R. (1961). IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5, 183. [15] Landauer, R. (1967). IEEE Spectrum. September, 105. [16] Landauer, R., (1971). Ferroelectrics, 2, 47. [17] Landauer, R. (1986). Foundations of Physics, 16, 551. [18] Landauer, R. (1988). Nature, 335, 779-784. [19] Landauer, R. (1991). PHYSICS TODAY, May, 23. [20] Lloyd, S. (1990). Any nonlinearity suffices for computation. Cal Tech. report CALT-68- 1689. [21] Lloyd, S., and Slotine, J.-J. (1996). Int. J. Adapt. Cont. Sig. Proce, 10, p. 499. [22] Moore, C. (1990). Unpredictability and undecidability in dynamical systems. Physical Review Letters}, 64, pp. 2354--2357. [23] Pour-El, M., and Richards, I. (1982). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 553. [24] Ruohonen, K. (1997). Complexity, 2, no. 6, p. 41. [25] Touchette, H., and Lloyd, S. (2000). Physical Review Letters. 84, no. 6, pp. 1256-1259. [26] Wheeler, J.A., and Zurek, W.H. (1983). Quantum theory and measurement. Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ. 785-786.38 [27] Wolpert, D. (1992). PHYSICS TODAY, 98, March. [28] Wolpert, D. (1992). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 31, 743-785. [29] Wolpert, D. (1990). The relationship between many-to-one mappings and thermodynamic irreversibility. Los Alamos Laboratory report LA-UR-90-4108. [30]Wolpert,D.(1996).AnIncompletenessTheoremforPredictingtheFuture.SantaFeInstitute working paper SFI-TR-96-03-008. See also Wolpert, D. (1991). On the computability of the future. Los Alamos Laboratory Report LA-UR-91-3344. [31] Wolpert, D. (1990). Complex Systems, 4,151-200, 201-249. [32] Wolpert, D. (1993). “The Second Law, Computation, and the Temporal (A)symmetry of Memory”, in Advances in the Physics of Computation , Ed. D. Matzke, IEEE press, 1993. [33] Zurek, W. (1988). Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy. Los Alamos Laboratory report LA-UR-88-1547. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: ThisworkwasdoneundertheauspicesoftheDepartmentofEnergy, the Santa Fe Institute, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I would like to thank Bill Macready, Cris Moore, Paul Stolorz, Tom Kepler and Carleton Caves for interesting discussion.

1 ON THE COMPUTATIONAL CAPABILITIES OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS PARTII:RELATIONSHIPWITHCONVENTIONALCOMPUTER SCIENCE by David H. Wolpert NASA Ames Research Center, N269-1, Moffett Field, CA 94035, dhw@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov PACS numbers: 02.10.By, 02.60.Cb, 03.65.Bz Abstract:Inthefirstofthispairofpapers,itwasproventhattherecannotbeaphysicalcomputer to which one can properly pose any and all computational tasks concerning the physical universe. It was then further proven that no physical computer C can correctly carry out all computational tasks that can be posed to C. As a particular example, this result means that no physical computer that can, for any physical system external to that computer, take the specification of that external system’s state as input and then correctly predict its future state before that future state actually occurs; one cannot build a physical computer that can be assured of correctly “processing infor- mationfasterthantheuniversedoes”.Theseresultsdonotrelyonsystemsthatareinfinite,and/or non-classical, and/or obey chaotic dynamics. They also hold even if one uses an infinitely fast, infinitely dense computer, with computational powers greater than that of a Turing Machine. This generality is a direct consequence of the fact that a novel definition of computation — “physical computation” — is needed to address the issues considered in these papers, which concern real2 physical computers. While this novel definition does not fit into the traditional Chomsky hierar- chy, the mathematical structure and impossibility results associated with it have parallels in the mathematics of the Chomsky hierarchy. This second paper of the pair presents a preliminary exploration of some of this mathematical structure. Analogues of Chomskian results concerning universal Turing Machines and the Halting theorem are derived, as are results concerning the (im)possibility of certain kinds of error-correcting codes. In addition, an analogue of algorithmic information complexity, “prediction complexity”, is elaborated. A task-independent bound is derived on how much the prediction complexity of a computational task can differ for two differ- ent reference universal physical computers used to solve that task, a bound similar to the “encod- ing” bound governing how much the algorithm information complexity of a Turing machine calculation can differ for two reference universal Turing machines. Finally, it is proven that either the Hamiltonian of our universe proscribes a certain type of computation, or prediction complex- ity is unique (unlike algorithmic information complexity), in that there is one and only version of it that can be applicable throughout our universe.3 INTRODUCTION Recently there has been heightened interest in the relationship between physics and computa- tion ([1-33]). This interest extends far beyond the topic of quantum computation. On the one hand, physics has been used to investigate the limits on computation imposed by operating com- puters in the real physical universe. Conversely, there has been speculation concerning the limits imposed on the physical universe (or at least imposed on our models of the physical universe) by the need for the universe to process information, as computers do. To investigate this second issue one would like to know what fundamental distinctions, if any, there are between the physical universe and a physical computer. To address this issue the first of thispairofpapersbeginsbyestablishingthattheuniversecannotcontainacomputertowhichone can pose any arbitrary computational task. Accordingly, paper I goes on to consider computer- indexedsubsetsofcomputationaltasks,whereallthemembersofanysuchsubset canbeposedto the associated computer. It then proves that one cannot build a computer that can “process infor- mationfasterthantheuniverse”.Moreprecisely,itisshownthatonecannotbuildacomputerthat can, for any physical system, correctly predict any aspect of that system’s future state before that future state actually occurs. This is true even if the prediction problem is restricted to be from the set of computational tasks that can be posed to the computer. This asymmetry in computational speeds constitutes a fundamental distinction between the universe and the set of all physical computers. Its existence casts an interesting light on the ideas of Fredkin, Landauer and others concerning whether the universe “is” a computer, whether there are “information-processing restrictions” on the laws of physics, etc. [10, 18]. In a certain sense, theuniverseismorepowerfulthananyinformation-processingsystemconstructedwithinitcould be. This result can alternatively be viewed as a restriction on the universe as a whole — the uni- versecannotsupporttheexistencewithinitofacomputerthatcanprocessinformationasfastasit can. The analysis of paper I also establishes (for example) the necessarily fallible nature of retrod-4 iction, of control, and of observation. (This latter result can be viewed as a kind of uncertainty principle that does not rely on quantum mechanics.) The way that results of such generality are derived is by examining the underlying issues from the broad perspective of the computational characterofphysicalsystemsingeneral,ratherthanthatofsomesinglepreciselyspecifiedphysi- cal system. The associated mathematics does not directly involve dynamical systems like Turing machines. Rather it casts computation in terms of partitions of the space of possible worldlines of the universe. For example, to specify what input a particular physical computer has at a particular time is to specify a particular subset of all possible worldlines of the universe; different inputs to thecomputationcorrespondtodifferentsuchsubsets.Similarpartitionsspecifyoutputsofaphys- icalcomputer.Resultsconcerningthe(im)possibilityofcertainkindsofphysicalcomputationare derived by considering the relationship between these kinds of partitions. In its being defined in termsofsuchpartitions,“physicalcomputation”involvesastructurethatneednotevenbeinstan- tiated in some particular physically localized apparatus; the formal definition of a physical com- puter is general enough to also include more subtle non-localized dynamical processes unfolding across the entire universe. This second paper begins with a cursory review of these partition-based definitions and results of paper I. Despite its being distinct from the mathematics of the Chomsky hierarchy, as elaboratedbelow,themathematicsandimpossibilityresultsgoverningthesepartitionsbearsmany parallels with that of the Chomsky hierarchy. Section 2 of this second paper explicates some of that mathematical structure, involving topics ranging from error correction to the (lack of) transi- tivity of computational predictability across multiple distinct computers. In particular, results are presented concerning physical computation analogues of the mathematics of Turing machines, e.g.,“universal”physicalcomputers,andHaltingtheoremsforphysicalcomputers.Inaddition,an analogue of algorithmic information complexity, “prediction complexity”, is elaborated. A task- independentboundisderivedonhowmuchthepredictioncomplexityofacomputationaltaskcan differ for two different reference universal physical computers used to solve that task. This bound is similar to the “encoding” bound governing how much the algorithmic information complexity5 of a Turing machine calculation can differ for two reference universal Turing machines. It is then proven that one of two cases must hold. One is that the Hamiltonian of our universe proscribes a certain type of computation. The other possibility is that, unlike conventional algorithmic infor- mation complexity, its physical computation analogue is unique, in that there is one and only ver- sion of it that can be applicable throughout our universe. Throughout these papers, B≡{0, 1},ℜis defined to be the set of all real numbers, ‘^’ is the logicalandoperator, and ‘NOT’ is the logical notoperator applied to B. To avoid proliferation of symbols, often set-delineating curly brackets will be used surrounding a single symbol, in which casethatsymbolistotakentobeavariablewiththeindicatedsetbeingthesetofallvaluesofthat variable. So for example “{y}” refers to the set of all values of the variable y. In addition o(A) is the cardinality of any set A, and 2Ais the power set of A. u ∈U are the possible states of the uni- verse,and^UisthespaceofallowedtrajectoriesthroughU.So^u∈^Uisasingle-valuedmapfrom t∈ ℜto u∈U, with ut≡^utthe state of the universe at time t. Note that since the universe is microscopically deterministic, utfor any t uniquely specifies^u. Sometimes there will be implicit constraints on^U. For example, we will assume in discussing any particular computer that the space^U is restricted to worldlines^u that contain that computer. An earlier analysis addressing some of the issues considered in this pair of papers can be found in [30]. I. REVIEW OF DEFINITIONS AND FOUNDATIONAL RESULTS RELATED TO PHYSICAL COMPUTATION InpaperItheprocessbywhichrealphysicalcomputersmakepredictionsconcerningphysical systems is abstracted to produce a mathematical definition of physical computation. This section reviews that definition and the associated fundamental mathematical results. The reader is referred to paper I for more extensive discussion of the definitions.6 i) Definition of a Physical Computer We start by distinguishing the specification of what we want the computer to calculate from the results of that calculation: Definition 1: Anyquestionq∈Q is a pair, consisting of a set A of answersand a single-valued function from^u∈^U toα ∈A. A(q) indicates the A-component of the pair q. Here we restrict attention to Q that are non-empty and such that there exist at least two elements in A(q) for at least one q ∈Q. We make no other a prioriassumptions concerning the spaces {A(q∈Q)} and Q. In particular, we make no assumptions concerning their finiteness. Example 1 (conventional prediction of the future): Say that our universe contains a system S externaltoourcomputerthatisclosedinthetimeinterval[0,T],andletubethevaluesoftheele- ments of a set of canonical variables describing the universe. αis the t = T values of the compo- nentsofuthatconcernS,measuredonsomefinitegridGoffiniteprecision.qisthisdefinitionof αwith G and the like fully specified. (So q is a partition of the space of possible uT, and therefore of^U,andαisanelementofthatpartition.)Qisasetofsuchq’s,differinginG,whoseassociated answers our computer can (we hope) predict correctly. Theinputtothecomputerisimplicitlyreflectedinitst=0physicalstate,asourinterpretation ofthatstate.Inthisexample(thoughnotnecessarilyingeneral),thatinputspecifieswhatquestion we want answered, i.e., which q and associated T we are interested in. It also delineates one of severalregionsR ⊆^U,eachofwhich,intuitively,givesthet=0stateofS.Throughouteachsuch R, the system S is closed from the rest of the universe during t ∈[0, T]. The precise R delineated further specifies a set of possible values ofu0(and therefore of the Hamiltonian describing S), for examplebybeinganelementofa(perhapsirregular)finiteprecisiongridoverU0,G'.If,forsome R, q(^u) has the same value for all^u∈R, then this input R uniquely specifies what αis for any associated^u. If this is not the case, then the R input to the computer does not suffice to answer7 question q. So for any q and region R both of which can be specified in the computer’s input, R must be a subset of a region q-1(α) for some α. Implicit in this definition is some means for correctly getting the information R into the com- puter’s input. In practice, this is often done by having had the computer coupled to S sometime beforetime0.Asanalternative,ratherthanspecifyRintheinput,wecouldhavetheinputcontain a “pointer” telling the computer where to look to get the information R. (The analysis of these papersholdsnomatterhowthecomputergainsaccesstoR.)Inaddition,inpracticetheinput,giv- ing R, q, and T, is an element of a partition over an “input section” of our computer. In such a case,theinputisitselfanelementofafiniteprecisiongridover^U,G".SoanelementofG"spec- ifies an element of G (namely q) and element of G' (namely R.) Given its input, the computer (tries to) form its prediction for αby first running the laws of physics on au0having the specified value as measured on G', according to the specified Hamilto- nian, up to the specified time T. The computer then applies q(.) to the result. Finally, it writes this prediction for αonto its output and halts. (More precisely, using some fourth finite precision grid G"' over its output section, it “writes out” (what we interpret as) its prediction for what region in UtheuniversewillbeinatT,that predictionbeingformallyequivalenttoa predictionofaregion in^U.) The goal is to have it do this, with the correct value of α, by time τ< T. Note that to have thecomputer’soutputbemeaningful,itmustspecifythequestionqbeingansweredaswellasthe answerα, i.e., the output must be a physical state of the computer that we interpret as a question- answer pair. Consider again the case where there is in fact a correct prediction, i.e., where R is indeed a subset of the region q-1(α) for some α. For this case, formally speaking, “all the computer has to do” in making its prediction is recognize which such region in the partition q that is input to the computer contains the region R that is also input to the computer. Then it must output the label of that region in q. In practice though, q and R are usually “encoded” differently, and the computer must“translate”betweenthoseencodingstorecognizewhichregionq-1(α)containsR;thistrans- lation constitutes the “computation”.8 Giventhisdefinitionofaquestion,wecannowdefinetheinputandoutputportionsofaphys- ical computer by generalizing our example of conventional computation. Definition 2: i) A (computation) partition is a set of disjoint subsets of^u whose union equals^U, or equivalently a single-valued mapping from^U into a non-empty space of partition-element labels. Unless stated otherwise, any partition is assumed to contain at least two elements. ii)In anoutput partition , the space of partition element labels is a space of possible “outputs”, {OUT}. iii)In a physical computer, we require {OUT} to be the space of all pairs {OUTq∈Q, OUTα∈ A(OUTq)},forsomeQandA(.)asdefinedinDef.(1).Thisspace —andthereforetheassociated outputpartition— isimplicitlyafunctionofQ.Tomakethisexplicit,often,ratherthananoutput partition,wewillconsiderthefullassociateddouble(Q,OUT(.)),whereOUT(.)istheoutputpar- tition^u∈^U→OUT∈{OUTq∈Q, OUTα∈A(OUTq)}. Also, we will find it useful to use an output partition to define an associated (“ prediction”) partition, OUTp(.) :^u→(A(OUTq(^u ), OUTα(^u )). iv)In aninput partition , the space of partition element labels is a space of possible “inputs”, {IN}. v)A (physical)computer consists of an input partition and an output partition double. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, both of those partitions are required to be (separately) surjective. Since we are restricting attention to non-empty Q, {OUT} is non-empty. We say that OUTqis the “questionposedtothecomputer”,andOUTαis“thecomputer’sanswer”.ThesurjectivityofIN(.) and OUT(.) is a restriction on {IN} and {OUT}, respectively. While motivated in large measure by the task of predicting the future, the definition of physi- cal computation is far broader, concerning any computation that can be cast in terms of inputs, questionsaboutphysicalstatesofnature,andassociatedanswers.Thissetofquestionsincludesin9 particular any calculation that can be instantiated in a physical system in our universe, whether that question is a “prediction” or not. All such physically realizable calculations are subject to the results presented below. Even in the context of prediction though, the definition of a physical computer presented here is much broader than computers that work by the process outlined in Ex. 1 (and therefore the associated theorems are correspondingly further-ranging in their implications). For example, the computer in Ex. 1 has the laws of physics explicitly built into its “program”. But our definition allows other kinds of “programs” as well. Our definition also allows other kinds of information inputtothecomputerbesidesqanda regionR(whichtogetherwithTconstitutetheinputsinEx. 1). As discussed in paper I, we will only need to require that there be somet = 0 state of the com- puter that, by accident or by design, induces the correct prediction at t = τ. This means we do not even require that the computer’s initial state IN “accurately describes” the t = 0 external universe in any meaningful sense. Our generalization of Ex. 1 preserves analogues of the grids G (in Q(.)), G" (in IN(.)) and G"' (in OUT(.)), but not of the grid G'. In fact, our formal definition of a physical computer broadens what we mean by the “input to the computer”, IN, even further. While the motivation for our definition, exemplified in Ex. 1, has the partition IN(.)“fix theinitial state of thecomputer’s inputs section”, that need not be the case. IN(.) can reflect anyattributes of^u. An “input” — an element of a partition of^U — need not eveninvolvethet=0stateofthephysicalcomputer.Inotherwords,asweusethetermshere,the computer’s “input” need not be specified in some t = 0 state of a physical device. Indeed, our def- inition does not even explicitly delineate the particular physical system within the universe that we identify with the computer. (A physical computer is simply an input partition together with an output partition.) This means we can even choose to have the entire universe “be the computer”. For our purposes, we do not need tighter restrictions in our definition of a physical computer. Nonetheless, a pedagogically useful example is any localized physical device in the real world meetingourlimitedrestrictions.Nomatterhowthatdeviceworks,itissubjecttotheimpossibility results described below.10 ii) Intelligible computation Consider a “conventional” physical computer, consisting of an underlying physical system whose t = 0 state sets IN(^u ) and whose state at time τsets OUT(^u ), as in our example above. Wewishtoanalyzewhetherthephysicalsystemunderlyingthatcomputercancalculatethefuture sufficiently quickly. In doing so, we do not want to allow any of the “computational load” of the calculationtobe“hidden”inarestrictiononthepossiblequestions.Ourcomputerpossessasuffi- cientdegreeofflexibility.Weimposethisviathefollowingconstruction(seepaperIforadetailed justification): Definition 3: Consider a physical computer C ≡(Q, IN(.), OUT(.)) and a^U-partition π. A func- tion from^U intoB, f, is anintelligibility function (forπ) if ∀^u,^u'∈^U,π(^u ) =π(^u' )⇒f(^u ) = f(^u' ). A set F of such intelligibility functions is an intelligibility set forπ. We view any intelligibility function as a question by defining A(f) to be the image of^U under f.IfFisanintelligibilitysetfor πandF⊆Q,wesaythat πisintelligible toCwithrespecttoF.If the intelligibility set is not specified, it is implicitly understood to be the set of all intelligibility functions for π. We say that two physical computers C1and C2aremutually intelligible (with respect to the pair{Fi})iffbothOUT2isintelligibletoC1withrespecttoF2andOUT1isintelligibletoC2with respect to F1. Plugging in, πis intelligible to C iff ∀intelligibility functions f, ∃q∈OUTqsuch that q = f, i.e., such that A(q) = the image of^U under f, and such that ∀^u∈^U, q(^u ) = f(^u ). Note that since π contains at least two elements, if πis intelligible to C, ∃OUTq∈{OUTq} such that A(OUTq) = B, an OUTqsuch that A(OUTq) = {0}, and one such that A(OUTq) = {1}. Usually we are inter- ested in the case where π is an output partition of a physical computer, as in mutual intelligibility.11 Intuitively,anintelligibilityfunctionforapartition πisamappingfromtheelementsof πinto B.πisintelligibletoCifQcontainsallbinary-valuedfunctionsof π,i.e.,ifCcanhaveposedany question concerning the universe as measured on π. This flexibility in C ensures that C’s output partitionisn’t“riggedaheadoftime”infavorofsomeparticularquestionconcerning π.Formally, by thesurjectivityofOUT(.),therequirementof intelligibility meansthat ∃^u'∈^Usuchthat ∀^u ∈^U, [OUTq(^u' )](^u ) = f(^u ). iii) Predictable computation We can now formalize the concept of a physical computer’s “making a correct prediction”: Definition 4: Consider a physical computer C, partition π, and intelligibility set for π, F. We say thatπ isweakly predictable to C with respect to F iff: i)π is intelligible to C with respect to F, i.e., F ⊆OUTq ; ii)∀ f∈F,∃IN∈{IN} that weakly induces f, i.e., an IN such that: IN(^u) = IN ⇒ OUTp(^u) = (A(OUTq(^u )), OUTα(^u )) = (A(f) ,f(^u)). Intuitively,condition(ii)meansthatforallquestionsqinF,thereisaninputstatesuchthatifCis initialized to that input state, C’s answer to that question q (as evaluated at τ) must be correct. Note that we even allow the computer to be mistaken about what question it is answering — i.e., for OUTq(^u ) to not equal f — so long as C’s answer is correct. We will say a computer C' with outputOUT'(.)isweaklypredictabletoanotherifthepartitionOUT'p(.)is.Ifwejustsay“predict- able” it will be assumed that we mean weak predictability. Asaformalmatter,notethatinthedefinitionofpredictable,eventhoughf(.)issurjectiveonto A(f) (cf. Def. 3), it may be that for some IN, the set of values f(^u ) takes on when^u is restricted sothatIN(^u)=INdonotcoverallofA(f).Thereadershouldalsobearinmindthatbysurjectiv-12 ity,∀IN∈{IN},∃^u∈^U such that IN(^u ) = IN. iv) Distinguishable computers There is one final definition that we need before we can establish our unpredictability results: Definition 5: Consider a set of n physical computers {Ci≡(Qi, INi(.), OUTi(.)) : i = 1, ..., n}. We say {Ci} is (input)distinguishable iff∀n-tuples (IN1∈{IN1}, ..., INn∈{INn}),∃^u∈^U such that∀ i, INi(^u ) = INi simultaneously. We say that {Ci} ispairwise(input)distinguishable if any pair of computers from {Ci} is distin- guishable, and will sometimes say that any two such computers C1and C2“are distinguishable from each other”. We will also say that {Ci} is amaximal (pairwise) distinguishable set if there are no physical computers C ∉ {Ci} such that C ∪ {Ci} is a (pairwise) distinguishable set. iv) The impossibility of posing arbitrary questions to a computer The first result in paper I states that for any pair of physical computers there are always binary-valuedquestionsaboutthestateoftheuniversethatcannotevenbeposedtoatleastoneof those physical computers: Theorem 1: Consider any pair of physical computers {Ci: i = 1, 2}. Either ∃finite intelligibility set F2for C2such that C2is not intelligible to C1with respect to F2, and/or∃finite intelligibility set F1 for C1 such that C1 is not intelligible to C2 with respect to F1. Thm.1reflectsthefactthatwhilewedonotwanttohaveC’soutputpartition“riggedaheadof time” in favor of some single question, we also cannot require too much flexibility of our com- puter. It is necessary to balance these two considerations. Accordingly, before analyzing predic- tion of the future, to circumvent Thm. 1 we must define a restricted kind of intelligibility set to13 which Thm. 1 does not apply: Definition 6: An intelligibility function f for an output partition OUT(.) is question-independent iff∀^u,^u'∈^U: OUTp(^u ) = OUTp(^u' ) ⇒ f(^u ) = f(^u' ). An intelligibility set as a whole is question-independent if all its elements are. We write C1> C2(or equivalently C2< C1) and say simply that C2is (weakly) predictable to C1(orequivalentlythatC1canpredict C2)ifC2isweaklypredictabletoC1forallquestion-inde- pendent finite intelligibility sets for C2. Similarly, from now on we will say that C2isintelligible to C1without specification of an intelligibility set if C2is intelligible to C1with respect to all question-independent finite intelligi- bility sets for C2. Intuitively,fisquestion-independentifitsvaluedoesnotvarywithqamonganysetofqallof which share the same A(q). As an example, say our physical computer is a conventional digital workstation. Have a certain section of the workstation’s RAM be designated the “output section” ofthatworkstation.Thatoutputsectionisfurtherdividedintoa“questionsubsection”designating (i.e.,“containing”)aq,andan“answersubsection”designatingan α.Saythatforallqthatcanbe designated by the question subsection A(q) is a single bit, i.e., we are only interested in binary- valued questions. Then for a question-independent f, the value of f can only depend on whether the answer subsection contains a 0 or a 1. It cannot vary with the contents of the question subsec- tion. Adetailedexampleofapairofmutually(question-independent)intelligiblecomputersispre- sentedinpaperI.InadditiontothisexplicitdemonstrationthatThm.1doesnotholdforquestion- independent intelligibility sets, examples 2, 2', and 2" of paper I establish that:14 a) There are pairs of input-distinguishable physical computers, C1, C2, in which C2is predictable to C1, C1 > C2; b) Given C1and C2as in (a), we could have yet another computer C3that also predicts C2(i.e., such that C3 > C2) while being distinguishable from C1; c) Given C1and C2as in (a), we could have a computer C4, distinguishable from both C1and C2, where C4 > C1, so that C4 > C1 > C2. We can do this either with C4 > C2 or not. ii) The impossibility of assuredly correct prediction To establish our main impossibility result in paper I we started with the following lemma: Lemma 1: Consider a physical computer C1. If∃any output partition OUT2that is intelligible to C1, then∃q1∈Q1such that A(q1) =B, a q1∈Q1such that A(q1) = {0}, and a q1∈Q1such that A(q1) = {1}. This can be used to establish paper I’s central theorem: Theorem 2 : Consider any pair of distinguishable physical computers {Ci: i = 1, 2}. It is not pos- sible that both C1 > C2 and C1 < C2. Restating it, Thm. 2 says that either ∃finite question-independent intelligibility set for C1, F1, suchthatC1isnotpredictabletoC2withrespecttoF1,and/or∃finitequestion-independentintel- ligibility set for C2, F2, such that C2 is not predictable to C1 with respect to F2. Thm. 2 holds no matter how large and powerful our computers are; it even holds if the “phys- icalsystemunderlying”oneorbothofourcomputersisthewholeuniverse.Italsoholdsifinstead C2is the rest of the physical universe external to C1. A set of implications of Thm. 2 for various kinds of physical prediction scenarios are discussed in paper I. As also discussed there, impossi-15 bility results that are in some senses even stronger than those associated with Thm. 2 hold when we do not restrict ourselves to distinguishable computers, as we do in Thm. 2. 3. THE MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURE RELATING PHYSICAL COMPUTERS There is a rich mathematical structure governing the possible predictability relationships amongsetsofphysicalcomputers,especiallyifonerelaxesthepresumption(obtaininginmuchof paper I) that the universe can contain multiple copies of C. This section presents some of that structure. i) The graphical structure over a set of computers induced by weak predictability While it directly concerns pairs of physical computers, Thm. 2 also has implications for the predictability relationships within sets of more than two computers. An example is the following: Corollary 1: It is not possible to have a fully distinguishable set of n physical computers {Ci} such that C1 > C2 > ... > Cn > C1. Proof:Hypothesize that the corollary is wrong. Define the composite device C*≡ (ΙΝ∗(.) ≡ Πi=1n-1INi(.), Q1, OUT1(.)). Since {Ci} is fully distinguishable, IN*(.) is surjective. Therefore C* is a physical computer. Since by hypothesis Cnis intelligible to Cn-1,∃OUTn-1 qsuch that A(OUTn-1 q) =B. Also, since Cn-2> Cn-1,∃INn-2∈{INn-2} such that ∀^u∈^U for which A(OUTn-1 q(^u )) =B, INn-2(^u ) = INn-2⇒OUTn-2 α(^u ) = OUTn-1 α(^u ). Iterating and exploiting full distinguishabil- ity,∃(IN1, ..., INn-2) such that ∀^u∈^U for which A(OUTn-1 q(^u )) =B, (IN1(^u ), .., INn-2(^u )) = (IN1, ..., INn-2)⇒OUT*(^u ) = OUT1(^u ) = OUTn-1(^u ). The same holds when we restrict^u so that the space A(OUTn-1 q(^u )) = {1}, and when we restrict^u so that A(OUTn-1 q(^u )) = {0}. Since by hypothesis Cnis intelligible to Cn-1, and since IN*(.) is surjective, this result means16 that Cnis predictable to C*. Conversely, since Cn> C1by hypothesis, the output partition of C*is predictable to Cn, and therefore C*is. Finally, since {Ci} is fully distinguishable, C*and Cnare distinguishable. Therefore Thm. 2 applies, and by using our hypothesis we arrive at a contradic- tion.QED. What are the general conditions under which two computers can be predictable to one another? By Thm. 2, we know they aren’t if they’re input-distinguishable. What about if they’re one and the same? No physical computer is input-distinguishable from itself, so Thm. 2 doesn’t apply to this issue. However it still turns out that Thm. 2’s implication holds for this issue: Theorem 3: No physical computer is predictable to itself. Proof.Assumeourcorollaryiswrong,andsomecomputerCispredictabletoitself.Sincebydef- inition predictability implies intelligibility, we can apply Lemma 1 to establish that there is a q ∈ OUTq,q',suchthatA(q')= B.Thereforeonequestion-independentintelligibilityfunctionforCis thefunctionffrom^u∈^U→Bthatequals1ifA(OUTq(^u))=BandOUTα(^u)=0,andequals 0 otherwise. Therefore by hypothesis ∃IN∈{IN} such that IN(^u ) = IN⇒A(OUTq(^u )) =B andOUTα(^u)=f(^u).ButifA(OUTq(^u ))=B, thenf(^u )=NOT[OUTα(^u)],bydefinitionof f(.).SinceINissurjective,thismeansthatthereisatleastone^u∈^UsuchthatA(OUTq(^u))=B and OUTα(^u ) = NOT[OUTα(^u )]. This is impossible. QED. Intuitively, this result holds due to the fact that a computer cannot make as its prediction the logi- cal inverse of its prediction. An important corollary of this result is that no output partition is pre- dictabletoaphysicalcomputerthathasthatoutputpartition.CombiningThm.3andCoroll.1and identifying the predictability relationship with an edge in a graph, we see that fully distinguish- able sets of physical computers constitute (unions of) directed acyclic graphs.17 ii) Weak predictability and variants of error correction When considering sets of more than two computers, it is important to realize that while it is symmetric, the input-distinguishability relation need not be transitive. Accordingly, separate pair- wise distinguishable sets of computers may partially “overlap” one another. Similarly, stipulating the values of the inputs of any two computers in a pairwise-distinguishable set may force some of the other computers in that set to have a particular input value. Coroll. 1 does not apply to such a set. As it turns out though, Thm. 2 still has strong implica- tions evenfora setofmore thantwo computersthat isnotfully distinguishable,so longas theset is pairwise distinguishable. Define a god computer as any physical computer in a pairwise distin- guishablesetsuchthatallotherphysicalcomputersinthatsetarepredictabletothegodcomputer. Then by Thm. 2, each such set can contain at most one god computer. There is at most one com- puter in any pairwise distinguishable set that can correctly predict the future of all other members of that set, and more generally at most one that can accurately predict the past of, observe, and/or control any system in that set (see paper I). In particular, for any human being physical computer, for any pairwise distinguishable set of computers including that human, there can be at most one god computer. (Lest one read too much into the phrase “god computer”, note that like any other computer, a god computer is merely a set of partitions, and need not correspond to any localized physical apparatus.) Even a god computer may not be able to correctly predict all other computers in its distin- guishable set simultaneously. The input value it needs to adopt to correctly predict some C2may preclude it from correctly predicting some C3and vice-versa. One way to analyze this issue is to consideracompositepartitionOUT2×3definedbytheoutputpartitionsofC2andC3.Wecanthen investigate whether and when our god computer can weakly predict the composite output parti- tion. The following definition formalizes this: Definition7: Considerapairwisedistinguishableset{Ci}withgodcomputerC1.Definethepar-18 titionsOUTi×j(^u∈^U)≡(OUTqi×j(^u),OUTαi×j(^u)),whereeachanswermapOUTαi×j(^u)≡ (OUT1 α(^u ), OUT2 α(^u )), and each question [OUTqi×j(^u )]≡the mapping given by^u'∈^U→ ([OUT1 q(^u)](^u'),[OUT2 q(^u)](^u')).ThenC1isomniscient ifOUT2×3×...isweaklypredictable to C1. Intuitively, OUTi×jis just the double partition (OUTi(.), OUTj(.)) = ((OUTi q(.), OUTi α(.)), (OUTj q(.), OUTj α(.)), re-expressed to be in terms of a single question-valued partition and a sin- gleanswer-valuedpartition.Tomotivatethisre-expression,foranytwoquestionsqi∈Qiandqj∈ Qj,letqi×qjbetheorderedproductofthepartitionsqiandqj;itisthepartitionassigningtoevery point^u'∈^U the label (qi(^u' ), qj(^u' )). Then if OUTi q(^u ) is the question qiand OUTj q(^u ) is the question qj, OUTi×j q(^u ) is the question qi×qj. OUTi×j αis defined similarly, only with one fewer levels of “indirection”, since answer components of output partitions are not themselves partitions (unlike question components). Note that even though any OUTi(.) and OUTj(.) are both surjective mappings, OUTi×jneed not be surjective onto the set of quadruples {qi∈Qi, qj∈Qj,αi∈A(Qi),αj∈A(Qj)}. It is straight-forward to verify that an omniscient computer is a god computer. In general, one might presume that two non-god computers in a pairwise-distinguishable set couldhavethepropertythat,whileindividuallytheycannotpredicteverything,consideredjointly they would constitute a god computer, if only they could work cooperatively. An example of such cooperativity would be having one of the computers predict when the other one’s prediction is wrong. It turns out though that under some circumstances the mere presence of some other com- puter in that pairwise distinguishable set may make such error-correction impossible, if that other computer is omniscient. As an example of this, say we have three pair-wise distinguishable computers C1, C2, C3, where C3always answers with a bit (i.e., / ∃q3∈Q3such that A(q3) |⊆B). We will want C2’s out- put to “correct” C3’s predictions, and have those predictions potentially concern C1. So have C1 be intelligible to C3. As a technical condition, assume not only that C3’s output can be any of its19 possiblequestion-answerpairs,butalsothatforanyofitsquestions,foranyoftheassociatedpos- sible answers, there are situations where that answer is correct (so that C2should leave C3’s answeraloneinthosesituations).ThenitturnsoutthatduetoThm.2,ifC1isomniscient,itisnot possible that C2always correctly outputs a bit saying whether C3’s answer is the correct response to C3’s question. More formally, Corollary 2: Consider three pair-wise distinguishable computers C1, C2, C3, where /∃q3∈Q3 such that A(q3) |⊆B. Assume that C1is an omniscient computer, and that C1is intelligible to C3. Finally, assume that ∀pairs (q3∈Q3,α3∈A(q3)),∃^u∈^U such that both OUT3 q(^u ) = q3and q3(^u ) =α3(i.e., [OUT3 q(^u )](^u ) =α3). Then it is not possible that ∀^u∈^U, OUT2 α(^u ) = 1 if [OUT3 q(^u )](^u ) = OUT3 α(^u ), 0 otherwise. Proof:Hypothesize that the corollary is wrong. Construct a composite device C2-3, starting by having IN2-3(.)≡OUT3 q(.), Q2-3= Q3and OUT2-3 q(.) = OUT3 q(.). Next define the question θby the ruleθ(^u )≡NOT[OUT3 α(^u )] if OUT2 α(^u ) = 0,θ(^u )≡OUT3 α(^u )otherwise. (N.b. no assumption is made that θ ∈Q2-3.) To complete the definition of the composite computer C2-3, have OUT2-3 α(^u ) =θ(^u ). Now by our hypothesis, ∀^u∈^U,θ(^u ) = [OUT3 q(^u )](^u ). By the last of the conditions specified in the corollary, this means that ∀(q2-3∈Q2-3,α2-3∈A(q2-3)),∃^u such that OUT2-3 q(^u ) = q2-3and OUT2-3 α(^u ) =α2-3. So C2-3allows all possible values of {OUT2-3}, as a physical computer must. Due to surjectivity of OUT3 q, it also allows all possible values of the space{IN2-3}.TocompletetheproofthatC2-3isa(surjective)physicalcomputer,wemustestab- lish that OUT2-3 α(^u )∈A(OUT2-3 q(^u ))∀^u∈^U. To do this note that if for example A(OUT2-3 q(^u )) = A(OUT3 q(^u )) = {1}, then since it is always the case that the OUT2-3 α(^u ) = [OUT2-3 q(^u )](^u ) = [OUT3 q(^u )](^u ), OUT2-3 α(^u ) = 1. Similarly OUT2-3 α(^u )∈ A(OUT2-3 q(^u )) when A(OUT2-3 q(^u )) = {0}. Finally, if A(OUT2-3 q(^u )) =B, then the simple fact that OUT2-3 α(^u )∈B always means that OUT2-3 α(^u )∈ A(OUT2-3 q(^u )).20 Since C1is intelligible to C3and Q2-3= Q3, C1is intelligible to C2-3. Moreover, given any question q2-3∈Q2-3,∃associated IN2-3∈{IN2-3} such that ∀^u∈^U for which IN2-3(^u ) = IN2-3, OUT2-3(^u ) = q2-3. But as was just shown, OUT2-3 α(^u ) = q2-3(^u ) for that^u. Therefore C1 is predictable to C2-3. Next, since C1is omniscient, OUT2×3is intelligible to C1. Therefore any binary function of the regions defined by quadruples (A(OUT2 q(^u )), A(OUT3 q(^u )), OUT2 α(^u ), OUT3 α(^u )) is an element of Q1. Any single such region is wholly contained in one region defined by the pair (A(OUT2-3 q(^u )),OUT2-3 α(^u ))though. Thereforeany binary function of theregionsdefined by such pairs is an element of Q1. Therefore C2-3is intelligible to Q1. Similarly, the value of any suchbinaryfunctionmustbegivenbyOUT1 α(^u)wheneverIN1(^u)equalssomeassociatedIN1. So C2-3 is predictable to C1. Finally, since C1and C3are input-distinguishable, so are C1and C2-3, and therefore Thm. 2 applies. This establishes that our hypothesis results in a contradiction. QED. This result even holds if OUT2×3is only intelligible to C1, without necessarily being predictable to it. Coroll. 2 can be viewed as a restriction on the efficacy of any error correction scheme in the presenceofa(distinguishable)omniscientcomputer.Thereareotherrestrictionsthatholdevenin the absence of such a third computer. An example is the following implication of Thm. 2: Corollary 3: Consider two distinguishable mutually intelligible physical computers C1and C2, wherebothA(OUT1 q)⊆BandA(OUT2 q)⊆B∀OUT1 q∈Q1andOUT2 q∈Q2.Itisimpossible that C1and C2are “anti-predictable” to each other, in the sense that for each of them, the predic- tion they make concerning the state of the other can always be made to be wrong by appropriate choice of input. Proof:By assumption C1and C2are mutually intelligible. So what we must establish is whether21 forbothofthem,forallintelligibilityfunctionsconcerningtheotherone,thereexistsanappropri- ate value of INi such that that intelligibility function is incorrectly predicted. Hypothesizethatthecorollaryiswrong.Then ∀question-independentintelligibilityfunctions for C1, f1,∃IN2∈{IN2} such that IN2(^u ) = IN2implies that [A(OUT2 q(^u)) = NOT[A(f1)]] ^ [OUT2 α(^u)=NOT[f1(^u)]]. However by definition of question-independent intelligibility func- tions, given any such f1, there must be another question-independent intelligibility function for C1, f3, defined by f3(.)≡NOT(f1(.)). Therefore ∃IN2∈{IN2} such that IN2(^u ) = IN2implies that [A(OUT2 q(^u)) = A(f3)] ^ [OUT2 α(^u)=f3(^u)]. This NOT(.) transformation bijectively maps the set of all question-independent intelligibility functions for C2onto itself. Since that set is finite, this means that the image of the set under the NOT(.) transformation is the set itself. Therefore our hypothesis means that all question-indepen- dent functions for C1can be predicted correctly by C2for appropriate choice of IN2∈{IN2}. By similarreasoning,weseethatC1canalwayspredictC2correctly.SinceC1andC2aredistinguish- able, we can now apply Thm. 2 and arrive at a contradiction. QED. iii) Strong predictability At the other end of the spectrum from distinguishable computers is the case where one com- puter’s input can fix another’s, either by being observed by that other computer or by setting that other computer’s input more directly. The following variant of predictability captures this rela- tionship: Definition8: ConsiderapairofphysicalcomputersC1andC2.WesaythatC2isstronglypredict- ableto C1(or equivalently that C1can strongly predict C2), and write C1>> C2(or equivalently C2 << C1) iff: i) C2 is intelligible to C1; ii)∀ question-independent intelligibility functions for C2, q1,∀ IN2∈ {IN2}, ∃IN1∈{IN1} thatstrongly induces the pair (q1, IN2), i.e., such that:22 IN1(^u) = IN1 ⇒ [OUT1 p(^u) = (A(q1),q1(^u))] ^ [IN2(^u ) = IN2]. Intuitively, if C1can strongly predict C2, then for any IN2and associated implication OUT2 p— for any computation C2might undertake — there is an input to C1that is uniquely associated with IN2and that causes C1to output (any desired question-independent intelligibility function of) OUT2 p. Intuitively, there is some invertible “translating” map that takes C2’s input and “encodes” it in C1’s input, in such a way that C1can “emulate” C2running on C2’s input, and thereby produce C2’s associated output. In this way C1can emulate C2, much like universal Tur- ing machines can emulate other Turing machines. (Recall the definition of universal Turing machine, and see the definition of a universal physical computer below.) Strongpredictabilityofacomputerimpliesweakpredictabilityofthatcomputer.(Unlikewith weak predictability, there is no such thing as strong predictability of a partition.) So for example both Thm. 3 and Coroll. 1 still hold if they are changed by replacing weak predictability with strongpredictability.Howeverweakpredictabilitydoesnotimplystrongpredictability.Moreover, the mathematics for sets of physical computers some of which are strongly predictable to each other(andthereforenotdistinguishable)differsinsomerespectsfromthatwhenallthecomputers aredistinguishable(theusualcontextforinvestigationsofweakpredictability).Anexampleisthe following result, which shows that strong predictability always is transitive, unlike weak predict- ability (cf. Ex. 2" in paper I): Theorem 4: Consider three physical computers {C1, C2, C3}, and a partition π, where both C3 andπ are intelligible to C1. i) C1 >> C2 >π ⇒C1 >π; ii) C1 >> C2 >> C3⇒C1 >> C3.23 Proof:To prove (i), let f be any question-independent intelligibility function for π. By Lemma 1, theeverywhere0-valuedquestion-independentintelligibilityfunctionof πiscontainedinQ1,and sinceC1>C2,theremustbeanIN1suchthatIN1(^u)=IN1⇒OUT1 α(^u)=0.Thesameistrue fortheeverywhere1-valuedfunction.Thereforetoprovetheclaimweneedonlyestablishthatfor every question-independent intelligibility function for π, f, for which A(f) = B, f∈Q1, and there exists an IN1such that IN1(^u ) = IN1⇒OUT1 α(^u ) = f(^u ). Restrict attention to such f from now on. Define a question-independent intelligibility function for C2, I2, such that A(I2) =B, and such that for all^u for which A(OUTq(^u )) =B, I2(^u ) = OUT2 α(^u ). (Note that since C2>π, there both exist^u for which OUT2 p(^u ) = (B, 1) and^u such that OUT2 p(^u ) = (B, 0.) Now by hypoth- esis, for any of the f we are considering, ∃IN2 f∈{IN2} such that IN2(^u ) = IN2 f⇒OUT2 p(^u ) = (B, f(^u )). However the fact that C1>> C2⇒ ∃IN1∈{IN1} such that IN1(^u ) = IN1⇒ IN2(^u)=IN2 fandsuchthatOUT1 p(^u)=(A(I2),I2(^u))=(B,I2(^u)).SinceIN2(^u)=IN2 ffor such a^u, A(OUT2 α(^u )) =B, and therefore I2(^u ) = OUT2 α(^u ). So OUT2 p(^u ) for such a^u equals (B, OUT2 α(^u )). So for that IN1, OUT1 p(^u ) = (A(f), f(^u )). This establishes (i). The proof for (ii) goes similarly, with the redefinition that IN1 ffixes the value of IN3 as well as ensuring that OUT2 p(^u ) = (A(f), f(^u )).QED. Strong predictability obeys the following result which is analogous to both Thm.’s 2 and 3: Theorem5: Consideranypairofphysicalcomputers{Ci:i=1,2}.ItisnotpossiblethatbothC1 >> C2 and C1 << C2. Proof:Choose any IN2. For any question-independent intelligibility function of OUT2 p, f, there mustexistanIN1 f∈{IN1}thatstronglyinducesIN2andf,sinceC1>>C2.LabelanysuchIN1as IN1 f(IN2beingimplicitlyfixed).Soforanysuchf,{^u:IN1(^u)=IN1 f}⊆{^u:IN2(^u)=IN2}. However since OUT2 pis not empty, there are at least two question-independent intelligibility24 functions of OUT2 p, f1and f2, where A(f1)≠A(f2) (cf. Lemma 1). Moreover, the intersection {^u : IN1(^u ) = IN1 f1}∩{^u : IN1(^u ) = IN1 f2} =∅, since these two sets induce different A(OUT1 q) (namely A(f1) and A(f2), respectively). This means that {^u:IN1(^u ) = IN1 f1}⊂ {^u : IN2(^u ) = IN2}. On the other hand, for the same reasons, there must also exist an IN2that strongly induces IN1 f1. Therefore ∃IN2'such that {^u:IN2(^u ) = IN2'}⊂{^u : IN1(^u ) = IN1 f1}.So{^u:IN2(^u )=IN2'}⊂{^u:IN2(^u )=IN2}.Thisisnotcompatiblewiththefactthat IN2(.) is a partition. QED. Many of the conditions in the preceding results can be weakened and the associated conclu- sionsstillhold.Indeed,thisiseventrueforThm.2,wherewecanweakenthedefinitionof“intel- ligibility” and still establish the impossibility of having both C1> C2and C2> C1. (For example, that impossibility will still obtain even if neither C1nor C2containsB-valued questions, if they insteadcontainallpossiblefunctionsmappingeachothers’valuesofOUTponto{0,1,2}.)These weakened version are usually more obscure though, which is why they are not presented here. iv) Physical computation analogues of Halting theorems in Turing machine theory There are several ways that one can relate the mathematical structure of physical computation to that of conventional computer science. Here we sketch the salient concepts for one such rela- tion coupling physical computation and the mathematical structure governing Turing machines (TMs). A TM is a device that takes in an input string on an input tape, then based on it produces a sequenceofoutputstrings,either“halting”atsometimewithafinaloutputstring,orneverhalt- ing. If desired, the fact that the halt state has / hasn’t been entered by any time can be reflected in a special associated pattern in the output string, in which case the sequence of output strings can always be taken to be infinite. As explicated above, in the real world inputs and (sequences of) outputs are elements of partitions of^U. So in one translation of TMs to physical computers, strings on tapes are replaced with elements of the partitions IN(.) and OUT(.). Rather than25 through a set of internal states, read/write operations, state-transition rules, etc., the transforma- tion of inputs to outputs in a physical computer is achieved simply through the definition of the pair of an associated input partition and output partition. For a TM that declares in its output string whether it has halted, the physical computation analogue of whether a computation will ever halt is simply whether^u is in some special subset of {OUT}. Although not formally required,intherealworldIN(.)andOUT(.)usuallydiffer.InthistheyareanalogoustoTM’swith multiple tapes rather than conventional single-tape TMs. An alternative to identifying the full output partition of a physical computer with a TM’s out- put tape, motivated by the definition of predictability, is to identify the coarser partition^u→ OUTp(^u ) with a TM’s output tape. (This is loosely analogous to a TM’s being able to overwrite the “question” originally posed on its tape when producing its “answer” on that tape.) We will adopt this identification from now on, and use it to identify the physical computation analogue of a TM as an input partition together with the surjective mapping^u→OUTp(^u ) of an associated output partition. ThisidentificationmotivatesseveralanaloguesoftheHaltingtheorem.Sincewhetherapartic- ularphysicalcomputerC2“halts”ornotcanbetranslatedintowhetheritsoutputisinaparticular region, the question of whether C2halts is a particular intelligibility function of C2. Correctly answering the question of whether C2halts means predicting that intelligibility function of C2. In the context of physical computation it is natural to broaden the issue to concern all intelligibility functions of C2. Accordingly, in this analogue of the claim resolved for TM’s (in the negative) by theHalting theorem,one asksifitis possibleto constructaphysical computerC1that canpredict any computer C2. To answer this, consider the case where C2is a copy of C1(cf. Def. 2(v) of paperIforaformaldefinitionofaphysicalcomputer’s“copy”).ThenbyapplyingThm.’s2,3and 5, one sees that the answer is no, in agreement with the Halting theorem. (See also Coroll. 3.) There exist a number of alternative physical computer analogues of the Halting problem. Thoughnotpursuedatlengthhere,itisworthbrieflypresentingonesuchalternative.Thisalterna- tive is motivated by arguing that, in the real world, one is not interested so much in whether the26 computation will ever “halt”, but rather whether the associated output is “correct”. If we take “correct” to be relative to a particular question, this motivates the following alternative analogue of the Halting theorem: Theorem 6: Given a set of physical computers {Ci}, /∃ C1∈{Ci} such that ∀ C2∈ {Ci}, i) C2 is intelligible to C1; ii)∀ q2∈ Q2,∃ IN1∈ {IN1} such that IN1(^u ) = IN1⇒ OUT1 α(^u ) = 1 iff q2(^u ) = OUT2 α(^u ). Proof:Choose C2such that OUT2(.) = OUT1(.). (If need be, to do this simply choose C2= C1.) Then in particular, OUT1 α(.) = OUT2 α(.). Now since C2is intelligible to C1by hypothesis, by Lemma 1 ∃q1∈Q1such that A(q1) = {0}, and therefore ∃q2∈Q2such that A(q2) = {0}. For that q2, OUT1 α(^u ) = 1 iff 0 = OUT1 α(^u ), which is impossible. QED. A TM T1can emulate a TM T2if for any input for T2, T1produces the same output as T2 when given an appropriately modified version of that input. (Typically, the “modification” involves pre-pending an encoding of T2to that input.) The analogous concept for a physical com- puterisstrongpredictability;onephysicalcomputercan“emulate”anotherifitcanstronglypre- dictthatotherone.Intuitively,thetwocomponentsofT1’semulatingT2,involvingT2’sinputand its computational behavior, respectively, correspond to the two components of the requirement concerning IN1values that occur in the definition of strong predictability. The requirement con- cerning IN1values that is imposed by ensuring that OUT1 p(^u ) = (A(q), q(^u )) for any q (that is an intelligibility function) for C2is analogous to encoding (the computational behavior of) the TM T2in a string provided to the emulating TM, T1. Requiring as well that the value IN1ensures that IN2(^u ) = IN2is analogous to also including an “appropriately modified” version of T2’s input in the string provided to T1. (Note that any mapping taking IN2∈{IN2} to an IN1that in turn induces that starting IN2is invertible, by construction.) This motivates the following defini-27 tion of the analogue of a universal TM: Definition 9: Auniversal physical computer for a set of physical computers is a member of that set that can strongly predict all other members of that set. Note that rather than reproduce the output of a computer it is strongly predicting, a universal physical computer produces the value of an intelligibility function applied to that output. This allows the computers in our set to have different output spaces from the universal physical com- puter. However it contrasts with the situation with conventional TM’s, being a generalization of such TM’s. v) Prediction complexity In computer science theory, given a universal TM T, the algorithmic complexity of an output string s is defined as the length of the smallest input string s' that when input to T produces s as output. To construct our physical computation analogue of this, we need to define the “length” of an input region of a physical computer. To do this we start with the following pair of definitions: Definition 10: For any physical computer C with input space {IN}: i)Given any partition π, a(weak) prediction input set (of C, for π) is any set s ⊆{IN} such that both every intelligibility function for πis weakly induced by an element of s, and for any propersubsetofsatleastonesuchfunctionisnotweaklyinduced.Wewritethespaceofallweak prediction input sets of C for π as C-1(π). ii)Given any other physical computer C' with input space {IN'} for which the set of all ques- tion-independent intelligibility functions is {f'}, a strong prediction input set of C, for the triple C',in'⊆{IN'}, and f'⊆{f'}, is any set s ⊆{IN} such that both every pair (f' ∈f ', IN'∈in') is strongly induced by a member of s, and for any proper subset of s at least one such pair is not stronglyinduced.Wewritethespaceofallstrongpredictioninputsets(ofC,forC', in',andf')as28 C-1(C',in',f '). Intuitively,thepredictionsetofCfor π/C'isaminimalsubsetof{IN}thatisneededbyCfor π/ C' to be predictable to C. In the case of strong prediction, we provide the associated definition the extra flexibility of being able to restrict what intelligibility functions are being considered. Now, to define the physical computation analogue of algorithmic information complexity, identifythe“lengthofaninputstring”withthenegativelogarithmofthevolumeofasubsetofthe partition IN(.): Definition 11: Given a physical computer C and a measure d µ over^U: i)DefineV( in⊆{IN})asthemeasureofthesetofall^u∈^UsuchthatIN(^u)∈in,anddefinethe length ofin (with respect to IN(.)) as l(in)≡ -ln[V(in)]; ii)Given a partition πthat is predictable to a physical computer C, define the prediction complex- ity ofπ (with respect to C), c(π | C), as minρ ∈ C-1(π) [l(ρ)]. We are primarily interested in prediction complexities of binary partitions, in particular of the binary partitions induced by the separate single elements of multi-element partitions. (The binary partitioninducedbysomep ∈π'is{^us.t.π'(^u)=p,^us.t.π'(^u)≠p}.)ToseewhatDef.11(ii) meansforsuchapartition,sayyouaregivensomeset σ⊂^U(i.e.,youaregivenabinarypartition of^U). Suppose further that you wish to know whether the universe is in σ, and you have some computer C to use to answer (all four intelligibility functions of) this question. Then loosely speaking, the prediction complexity of σwith respect to C is the minimal amount of Shannon information that must be imposed in C’s inputs in order to be assured that C’s output correctly answers that question. In particular, if σcorresponds to a potential future state of some system S external to C, then c(σ| C) is a measure of how difficult it is for C to predict that future state of S.1s In many situations it will be most natural to choose d µto be uniform over accessible phase29 spacevolume,sothatthecomplexityof inisthenegativephysicalentropyofconstraining^utolie inin. But that need not be the case. For example, we can instead define d µso that the volume of each element of the associated {IN} is some arbitrary positive real number. In this case, the lengths of the elements of {IN} provides us with an arbitrary ordering over those elements. The following example illustrates the connection between lengths of regions inand lengths of strings in TM’s: Example 3: In a conventional computer (see Ex. 1 above), we can define a “partial string” s (sometimes called a “file”) taking up the beginning of an input section as the set of all “complete strings” taking up the entire input section whose beginning is s. We can then identify the input to thecomputerassuchapartialstringinitsinputsection.(Typically,therewouldbeaspecialfixed- size“lengthofpartialstring”regionevenearlier,attheverybeginningoftheinputsection,telling thecomputerhowmuchofthecompletestringtoreadtogetthatpartialstring.)Ifweappendcer- tain bits to s to get a new longer input partial string, s', the set of complete strings consistent with s' is a proper subset of the set of complete strings consistent with s. Assuming our measure d µis independent of the contents of the “length of partial string” region, this means that l(s')≥l(s). ThisisinaccordwiththeusualdefinitionofthelengthofastringusedinTuringmachinethe- ory.Indeed,ifs'containsnmorebitsthandoess,thenthereare2ntimesasmanycompletestrings consistentwithsasthereareconsistentwiths'.Accordingly,ifwetakelogarithmstohavebase2, l(s') =l(s) + n. Saywewantourcomputertobeabletopredictwhether^uliesinsomeset σ.(Tomaintainthe analogywithTuringmachines, σcoulddelineatean“outputpartialstring”.Thiscouldbedonefor example by delineating a particular OUTpvalue, perhaps even one in some other computer.) In the usual way, this corresponds to having the binary partition {^u∈ σ,^u∉ σ} be weakly predict- able to our computer. So the prediction complexity of that prediction is the length of the shortest region of our input space that will weakly induce that prediction. (Note that since we require that all four intelligibility functions of σbe induced, more than one input “partial string” is required30 for that induction, in general.) ThefactthatOUTpvaluesspecifythesetA(OUTq)makesworkingwithDef.’s10and11abit messy.Inparticular,torelatepredictioncomplexitytopropertiesoftheassociateduniversalphys- ical computer we must use a set of “identity” intelligibility functions defined as follows: Definition 12 (i): Given a space X ⊆Band a physical computer C with input and output spaces {IN} and {OUT} respectively, {IC X} is the set of all question-independent intelligibility functions of C where A(IC X) = X, and where ∀^u such that A(OUTq(^u )) = X, IC X(^u ) = OUTα(^u ). We also will need the following definition: Definition 12 (ii): Given a space X ⊆Band a physical computer C with input and output spaces {IN} and {OUT} respectively, when X is a set C-1(X) is also a set, defined as those IN ∈ {IN} such that IN( ^u ) = IN ⇒ A(OUTq(^u )) = X. So for example, if X = B, a pair (IN2∈[C2]-1(X), I2 X∈{I2 X}) is an input to C2and an intelligi- bility function of C2’s output, respectively. That input IN2induces an associated output question, q2∈OUT2 q,thattakeson(both) Bvaluesasonevariesoverthe^uinputtoit.Similarly,theintel- ligibility function IN2 X takes on (both) B values as one varies over the inputs to it. Using these definitions, we now bound how much more complex a partition can appear to C1 than to C2if C1can strongly predict C2. Though somewhat forbidding in appearance, intuitively, the bound simply reflects the complexity cost of “encoding” C2 in C1’s input. Theorem 8: Given any partition π and physical computers C1 and C2 where C1 >> C2 >π,31 i) c(π | C1) -c(π | C2)≤ ln[o(2π)] - ln[3] + max{X⊆B, IN2∈[C2]-1(X), I2X∈{I2X}}l[ (C1)-1(C2, IN2, I2 X) ] - min{X⊆B, IN2∈[C2]-1(X)}l[ IN2] , or alternatively, ii) c(π | C1) -c(π | C2)≤ ln[o(2π)] + min{X⊆B, IN2∈[C2]-1(X), I2X∈{I2X}}l[ (C1)-1(C2, IN2, I2 X) ] - min{X⊆B, IN2∈[C2]-1(X)}l[ IN2 ] . Proof:Givenanyintelligibilityfunctionffor π,consideranyIN2 f∈{IN2}thatweaklyinducesf, i.e.,suchthatIN2(^u)=IN2 f⇒OUT2 p(^u)=(A(f),f(^u)).(Theanalysiswillnotbeaffectedif π is an output partition and we restrict attention to those intelligibility functions for πthat are ques- tion-independent.)SinceC1>>C2,wecanthenchooseanIN1,IN1 f(IN2 f),tostronglyinduceIN2 f together with any question-independent intelligibility function of OUT2 p. (Indeed, in general therecanbemorethanonesuchvalueofIN1thatinducesIN2 f.)Soinparticular,wecanchooseit so that the vector OUT1 p(^u ) = (A(I2 A(f)), I2 A(f)(^u )) for any possible function I2 A(f). Now for that IN1, IN2(^u ) = IN2 f, and therefore A(OUT2 q(^u )) = A(f), which means that I2 A(f)(^u ) = OUT2 α(^u ), which in turn equals f(^u ) for that IN2. So∀^u such that IN1(^u ) = IN1 f(IN2 f), OUT1 p(^u ) = (A(f), f(^u )). In other words, IN1 f(IN2 f) weakly induces in C1the same intelligibil- ity function for πthat IN2 fweakly induces in C2. However since IN1(^u ) = IN1 f(IN2 f)⇒ IN2 f(^u ) = IN2 f, the set of^u∈^U such that IN1(^u ) = IN1 f(IN2 f) is⊆the set such that IN2(^u ) = IN2 f. This means that l(IN1 f(IN2 f))≥l(IN2 f). (Our task, loosely speaking, is to bound this differ- enceinlengths,andthentoextendtheanalysistosimultaneouslyconsiderallsuchquestion-inde- pendent intelligibility functions f.) Take {fi} to be the set of all intelligibility functions for π.By the preceding construction, πis weakly predictable to C1with a (not necessarily proper) subset of {IN1 fi(IN2 fi)} being a member32 of (C1)-1(π). Now any member of (C1)-1(π) must contain at least three disjoint elements, corre- sponding to intelligibility functions q with A(OUT1 q(^u )) =B, {0}, or {1}. (See the discussion just before Lemma 1.) Accordingly, the volume (as measured by d µ) of any subset of {IN1 fi(IN2 fi)}∈(C1)-1(π)mustbeatleast3timesthevolumeoftheelementof{IN1 fi(IN2 fi)}hav- ing the smallest volume. In other words, the length of any subset of {IN1 fi(IN2 fi)}∈(C1)-1(π) must be at most -ln(3) plus the length of the longest element of {IN1 fi(IN2 fi)}. Therefore c(π| C1) ≤maxfi [l(IN1 fi(IN2 fi))] - ln(3). Now take {IN2 fi} to be the set in (C2)-1(π) with minimal length. {IN2 fi} has at most o(2π) dis- joint elements, one foreach intelligibility functionfor π. Using therelation mini[gi]= -maxi[-gi], thismeansthat c(π|C2)≥-ln[o(2π)]+minfi[l(IN2 fi)].Thereforewecanwrite c(π|C1)-c(π|C2) ≤ln[o(2π)] - ln(3) + maxfi[l(IN1 fi(IN2 fi))] - minfi[l(IN2 fi)]. The fact that for all IN2 fi, IN2(^u ) = IN2 fi⇒ A(OUT2 q(^u )) = A(fi)⊆B completes the proof of (i). Toprove(ii),notethatwecanalwaysconstructoneofthesetsin(C1)-1(π)bystartingwiththe set consisting of the element of {IN1 fi(IN2 fi)} having the shortest length, and then successively adding other IN1values to that set, until we get a full (weak) prediction set. Therefore c(π| C1)≤ minfil(IN1 fi(IN2 fi)). Using this bound rather than the one involving -ln(3) establishes (ii). QED. Note that the set of X ∈Bsuch that [C2]-1(X) exists must be non-empty, since C2>π. Simi- larly, C2>πmeans that there is a^u such that A(OUTq(^u )) = X⊆B. The associated I2 Xalways existsbyconstruction:simplydefineI2 X(^u)=OUT2 α(^u)∀^usuchthatA(OUTq(^u))=X,and forallother^u,I2 X(^u)=xforsomex ∈X.Thereforetheextremainourboundsarealwayswell- defined. Asonevaries π,inbothboundsinThm.8thedependenceoftheboundonC1andC2doesnot change.Inaddition,thoseboundsareindependentof πforallπsharingthesamecardinality.Soin particular they are independent of πfor all binary partitions like those discussed in Ex. 3. This illustrates how Thm. 7 is the physical computation analogue of the result in Turing machine the- orythatthedifferenceinalgorithmiccomplexityofafixedstringwithrespecttotwoseparateTur-33 ing machines is bounded by the complexity of “emulating” the one Turing machine on the other, independent of the fixed string in question. Considerthepossibilitythatforthelawsofphysicsinouruniverse,thereexistpartitionsIN(.) and OUT(.) that constitute a universal physical computer C*for all other physical computers in our universe. Then by Thm. 5, no other computer is similarly universal. Therefore there exists a uniquepredictioncomplexitymeasurethatisapplicabletoallphysicalcomputersinouruniverse, namely complexity with respect to C*. (This contrasts with the case of algorithmic information complexity,wherethereisanarbitrarinessinthechoiceoftheuniversalTMused.)Ifinsteadthere is no universal physical computer in our universe, then every physical computer C must fail at least once at (strongly) predicting some other physical computer. (Note that unlike the case with weak predictability considered in Thm. 2, here we aren’t requiring that the universe be capable of having two distinguishable versions of C.) This establishes the following: Theorem 9: Either infallible strong prediction is impossible in our universe, or there is a unique complexity measure in our universe. Similar conclusions hold if one restricts attention to a set of (physically localized) conventional physical computers (cf. Ex. 1 above), where the light cones in the set are arranged to allow the requisite information to reach the putative universal physical computer. FUTURE WORK AND DISCUSSION Any results concerning physical computation should, at a minimum, apply to the computer lying on a scientist’s desk. However that computer is governed by the mathematics of determinis- tic finite automata, not that of Turing machines. In particular, the impossibility results concerning Turing machines rely on infinite structures that do not exist in any computer on a scientist’s desk.34 Accordingly,thereisa discrepancybetweenthedomainofthoseresultsandthatofanytrulygen- eral theory of physical computers. On the other hand, when one carefully analyzes actual computers that perform calculations concerning the physical world, one uncovers a mathematical structure governing those computers that is replete with its own impossibility results. While much of that structure parallels Turing machine theory, much of it has no direct analogue in that theory. For example, this new structure has no need for tapes, moveable heads, internal states, read/write capabilities, and the like, none of which have any obvious connection to the laws governing our universe (i.e., any connection to quantum mechanics and general relativity). In fact, when the underlying functions of real-world computers are stripped down to their essentials, one does not even need to identify a “computer” with a device occupying a particular localized region of space-time, never mind one with heads and the like. In place of all those con- cepts one has a structure involving several partitions over the space of all worldlines of the uni- verse. The partitions in that structure delineate a particular computer’s inputs, the questions it addresses, and its outputs. The impossibility results of physical computation concern the relation of those partitions. Computers in the conventional, space-time localized sense (the box on your desk)aresimplyspecialexamples,withlotsofextrarestrictionsthatturnouttobeunnecessaryin the underlying mathematics. Accordingly, the general definition of a “physical computer” has no such restrictions. A side-benefit of this breadth is that the associated mathematics can be viewed asconcerningmanyinformation-processingactivities(e.g.,observation,control)normallyviewed as distinct from computation. In the first paper in this pair, this definition of a physical computer was motivated and pre- sented, along with some associated theorems. Those theorems imply, amongst other things, that fool-proof prediction of the future is impossible — there are always some questions concerning the future that cannot even be posed to a computer, and of those that can be posed, there are alwayssomeforwhichthecomputer’sanswerwillbewrong.Byexploitingthebreadthofthedef- inition of physical “computation”, similar results hold for the information-processing of observa- tion and of control. All of this is true even in a classical, non-chaotic, finite universe, and regardless of the where in the Chomsky hierarchy the computer lies.35 This second paper launches from the theorems of the first paper into a broader, albeit prelimi- nary investigation of the mathematics of physical computation. It is shown that the computability structurerelatingdistinctphysicalcomputersisthatofadirected,acyclicgraph.Inaddition,there is at most one computer (called a “god computer”) that can predict /observe /control all other computers. Other results derived include limits on error-correction using multiple computers, and some analogues of the Halting theorem. Next a definition of the complexity of a particular computational task for a particular physical computer, prediction complexity, is motivated. The motivation of this new definition of complex- ity proceeds by analogy to the concept of the algorithmic information complexity of a symbol sequence for a universal Turing machine. However whereas algorithmic information complexity concerns a Turing machine’s generating such a symbol sequence, prediction complexity involves a physical computer’s addressing a computational task concerning the physical universe. The difference in prediction complexity of a particular task πfor two different physical com- puters C1and C2is considered. It is proven that that complexity difference is bounded by a func- tionthatonlydependsonC1andC2,andisindependentof π.Thisboundrelatingthedifferencein complexity for two physical computers is analogous to the algorithmic information complexity costofemulatingoneuniversalTuringmachinewithanotherone.Finally,itisproventhateithera certainkindofcomputation isnotpossiblein ouruniverse,orthere isapreferred computerinour universe.Ifitexists,thatcomputercouldbeusedtouniquelyspecifythepredictioncomplexityof any taskπ. Accordingly, either a certain kind of computation is impossible, or there is a preferred definition of physical complexity (in contrast to the arbitrariness inherent in algorithmic informa- tion complexity’s choice of universal Turing machine). The following ideas are just a few of the questions that the analysis of this paper raises: i) What other restrictions are there on the predictability relations within distinguishable sets of physical computers beyond that they form unions of DAG’s? In other words, which unions of DAG’s can be manifested as the predictability relations within a distinguishable set? How does this answer change depending on whether we are considering sets of fully input-distinguishable computers or sets of pairwise-distinguishable computers? For what computers are there finite /36 countably infinite / uncountably infinite numbers of levels below it in the DAG to which it belongs? Might such levels be gainfully compared to the conventional computer science theory issue of position in the Chomsky hierarchy? ii)Onemighttrytocharacterizetheunpredictability-of-the-futureresultofpaperIasthephysical computation analogue of the following issue in Turing machine theory. Can one construct a Tur- ingmachineMthatcantakeasinputA,anencodingofaTuringmachineanditstape,andforany such A compute what state A’s Turing machine will be in after will be in after n steps, and per- form this computation in fewer than n steps? This characterization suggests investigating the for- mal parallels (if any) between the results of these papers and the “speed-up” theorems of computer science. iii) More speculatively, the close formal connection between the results of this second paper and those of computer science theory suggest that it may be possible to find physical analogues of most of the other results of computer science theory, and thereby construct a full-blown “physical computer science theory”. In particular, it may be possible to build a hierarchy of physical com- puting power, in analogy to the Chomsky hierarchy. In this way we could translate computer sci- ence theory into physics, and thereby render it physically meaningful. We might be able to do at least some of this even without relying on the DAG relationship amongthephysicalcomputersinaparticularset.Asanexample,wecouldconsiderasystemthat cancorrectly predict the future state of the universe from any current state of the universe, before that future state occurs. The behavior of such a system is perfectly well-defined, since the laws of physics are fully deterministic (for quantum mechanics this statement implicitly presumes that one views those laws as regarding the evolution of the wave function rather than of observables determined by non-unitary transformations of that wave function). Nonetheless, by the central unpredictability result ofpaper I, we know that such a system lies too high in the hierarchy to exist in more than one copy in our physical universe.37 With such a system identified with an oracle of computer science theory we have the defini- tion of a “physical” oracle. Can we construct further analogues with computer science theory by leveraging that definition of a physical oracle? In other words, can we take the relationships between (computer science) oracles, Turing machines, and the other members of the (computer science) Chomsky hierarchy, and use those relationships together with our (physical) oracle and physical computers to gainfully define other members of a (physical) Chomsky hierarchy? iv) Can we then go further and define physical analogues of concepts like P vs. NP, and the like? Might the halting probability constant Ωof algorithmic information theory have an analogue in physical computation theory? As another example of possible links between conventional computer science theory and that ofphysicalcomputers,isthereaphysicalcomputeranalogueofBerry’sparadox?Weaklypredict- ing a partition is the physical computation analogue of “generating a symbol sequence” in algo- rithmic information complexity. The core of Berry’s paradox is that there are numbers k such that no Turing machine can generate a sequence having algorithmic information complexity k (with respect to some pre-specified universal Turing machine U). So for example one closely related issue in physical computation is to characterize the physical computers C1and x∈ ℜsuch that ∃ a computer C2where C1>> C2and where ∀partitions π,C2weakly predicts whether c(π| C1) > x (i.e., such that ∃IN2∈{IN2} such that IN2(^u ) = IN2⇒OUT2 p(^u ) = (B, whether c(π| C1) > x)). v) Concernsofcomputersciencetheory,andinparticularofthetheoryofTuringmachines,have recently been incorporated into a good deal of work on the foundations of physics [33}. Future work involves replacing physical computers for Turing machines in this work, along with replac- ing notions like prediction complexity for notions like algorithmic complexity. vi) Other future work involves investigating other possible definitions of complexity for physical38 computation. Even sticking to analogues of algorithmic information complexity, these might extend significantly beyond the modifications to the definition of prediction complexity discussed inthetext.Forexample,onemighttrytodefinetheanalogueofabitsequence’s“length”interms of the number of elements in Q. One might also take the (inverse) complexity of a computational device to be the number of input-distinguishable computers that can predict that device (working in some pre-specified input-distinguishable set, presumably). vii)Yetotherfutureworkincludescalculatingphysicalcomplexityofvarioussystemsforsomeof the simple physical models of real-world computers (e.g., “billiard ball” computers, DNA com- puting, etc.) that have been investigated, and investigating the prediction complexity of systems like crystals and gases. FOOTNOTES [1] Especially for non-binary π,many other definitions of prediction complexity besides Def. 11(ii) can be motivated. For example, one could reasonably define the complexity of πto be the sumofthecomplexitiesofeachbinarypartitioninducedbyanelementof π,i.e.,onecoulddefine it asΣp∈πc({^u∈p,^u∉p} | C). Another variant, one that would differ from the one considered in the text even for binary partitions, is minρ∈C-1(π) [ΣIN∈ρl(IN)]. For reasons of space, no such alternatives will be considered in this paper. REFERENCES39 [1] Adami, C. and Cerf, N.J. (2000). Physica D. 137, pp. 62-69. [2] Bennett, C.H. (1973). IBM Journal of Research and Development, 17, 525-532. [3 Bennett, C. H. (1982). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 905. [4] Bennett, C. H. (1987). Scientific American. 257 (11), 88. [5] Bennett, C. H. (1988). IBM Journal of Research and Development, 32 (no. 1), 16-24. [6] Berger, J. (1990), International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 29, no. 9, 985-995. [7] da Costa, N., and Doria, F. (1991). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 30, 1041. [8] Farmer, J., and Sidorowich, J. (1988). Exploiting chaos to predict the future and reduce noise, Los Alamos Laboratory report LA-UR-88-901. [9] Feynman, R. (1986). Foundations of Physics, 16, 507. [10] Fredkin, E., and Toffoli, T. (1982). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 219. [11] Gell-Mann, M., and Lloyd, S. (1996). Complexity, 2, pp. 44-52. [12] Geroch, R., Hartle, J. (1986). Foundations of Physics, 16, 533. [13] Kanter, I. (1990). Physical Review Letters. 64. 332. [14] Landauer, R. (1961). IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5, 183. [15] Landauer, R. (1967). IEEE Spectrum. September, 105. [16] Landauer, R., (1971). Ferroelectrics, 2, 47. [17] Landauer, R. (1986). Foundations of Physics, 16, 551. [18] Landauer, R. (1988). Nature, 335, 779-784. [19] Landauer, R. (1991). PHYSICS TODAY, May, 23. [20] Lloyd, S. (1990). Any nonlinearity suffices for computation. Cal Tech. report CALT-68- 1689. [21] Lloyd, S., and Slotine, J.-J. (1996). Int. J. Adapt. Cont. Sig. Proce, 10, p. 499. [22] Moore, C. (1990). Unpredictability and undecidability in dynamical systems. Physical Review Letters}, 64, pp. 2354--2357. [23] Pour-El, M., and Richards, I. (1982). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 553. [24] Ruohonen, K. (1997). Complexity, 2, no. 6, p. 41.40 [25] Touchette, H., and Lloyd, S. (2000). Physical Review Letters. 84, no. 6, pp. 1256-1259. [26] Wheeler, J.A., and Zurek, W.H. (1983). Quantum theory and measurement. Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ. 785-786. [27] Wolpert, D. (1992). PHYSICS TODAY, 98, March. [28] Wolpert, D. (1992). International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 31, 743-785. [29] Wolpert, D. (1990). The relationship between many-to-one mappings and thermodynamic irreversibility. Los Alamos Laboratory report LA-UR-90-4108. [30]Wolpert,D.(1996).AnIncompletenessTheoremforPredictingtheFuture.SantaFeInstitute working paper SFI-TR-96-03-008. See also Wolpert, D. (1991). On the computability of the future. Los Alamos Laboratory Report LA-UR-91-3344. [31] Wolpert, D. (1990). Complex Systems, 4,151-200, 201-249. [32] Wolpert, D. (1993). “The Second Law, Computation, and the Temporal (A)symmetry of Memory”, in Advances in the Physics of Computation , Ed. D. Matzke, IEEE press, 1993. [33] Zurek, W. (1988). Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy. Los Alamos Laboratory report LA-UR-88-1547. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: ThisworkwasdoneundertheauspicesoftheDepartmentofEnergy, the Santa Fe Institute, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I would like to thank Bill Macready, Cris Moore, Paul Stolorz, Tom Kepler and Carleton Caves for interesting discussion.

arXiv:physics/0005060v1 [physics.optics] 23 May 2000Sub-Doppler resolution with double coherently driving fiel ds Po Dong1, *, A.K. Popov2, Tang Sing Hai1, and Jin-Yue Gao3 1Physics Department, National University of Singapore, 119 260, Singapore∗Electronic address: scip9544@nus.edu.sg 2Institute for Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences and Kra snoyarsk State University, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia 3Physics Department, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 13 0023, China (February 21, 2014) We propose a four-level model where sub-Doppler resolution as well as enhanced absorption of a weak probe field are realized by using two coherently driving fields. We show that spectral resolution can be improved by modifying the coherent fields intensity an d frequencies. PACS number(s): 42.50.Hz, 42.50.Ct, 42.50.Gy I. INTRODUCTION Multi-photon transitions are embedded in a variety of optic al effects based on correlated absorption and emission of two or more photons. Step-wise and multi-photon processe s can be distinguished by their frequency-correlation properties [1,2]. Sub-Doppler resolution for an inhomogen eously broadened medium based on multi-photon processes has attracted much attention in recent decades. The physica l essence for this method lies in the fact that a detuning for multi-photon transition stipulated by Doppler frequency s hift can be reduced or eliminated by adopting appropriate light propagation direction, since the detuning is the sum o r difference of multiple single-photon transition detuning s. Sub-Doppler nonlinear optical resonance as appearance of q uantum coherence and interference in the context of frequency-correlation properties of the coherent compone nts have been proposed in [3]. A widely used method is Doppler-free two- or multi-photon absorption where the vel ocity dependent detuning could be removed in the case that the wave vectors of the interacting beams sum down to zer o (for a review, see [4]). This type of sub-Doppler spectrum is characterized by a large detuning from the inter mediate resonance, measuring the fluorescence from the upper level as well as by small cross sections for these multi -photon processes. Enhanced by intermediate resonance sub-Doppler processes based on the use of strong driving fiel ds and on a change of frequency-correlation properties of resonant multi-photon process in strong resonant fields, have been proposed in [3] and further developed in [5,6] (also in [2]). Substantial enhancement in absorption, gain and fluorescence controlled with the auxiliary appropriate ly propagating electro-magnetic wave has been predicted. An i nterference nature of the spectrum modification has been stressed, which implies that along the growth of the absorpt ion (gain) in certain spectral intervals, integral over the frequency may even decrease. A role of increase of intensity of a probe field as well as features of Doppler-free lasers were explored too. Control of atomic response with intense coupling lasers has been a subject of many intensive studies in the context of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) [7], am plification without inversion (AWI) [8–11], enhancement of the refractive index without absorption [12] and so on (fo r review see [8,11,13]). Sub-Doppler resolution by using intense coherently driving field(s) at other transition(s) has been recently further explored in [14,15]. In Ref. [14] p robe 1weak field absorption spectrum in three-level schemes was co nsidered. It was pointed out that the linewidth of one of the two Autler-Townes absorption peaks can be reduced by m atch of the coupling field intensity and frequency. In a later work [15], an experimental observation of steady-st ate sub-Doppler linewidth in a Doppler-broadened Λ-type Rb atomic system was reported. Related works to reduce Doppl er broadening with atomic coherence effects could be found in Ref. [16] and multiple sub-Doppler lines have been s hown to achieve through a strong coupling field and a saturation effects in a three-level system [17]. In the recent papers [18], cancellation of Doppler broadeni ng by applying different frequency fields was proposed with one or two coherently driving lasers. As it has been outl ined, sub-Doppler structures can be induced without population redistribution. At that not only absorption and gain, but four-wave mixing output can be enhanced through Doppler-free coupling controlled with auxiliary c o- or counter-propagating driving electromagnetic radiat ion. In this paper, we propose a four-level scheme, where both upp er and lower levels of a probe transition are coupled with other levels via strong coherent fields. In this scheme, four absorption peaks could be found on account of the fact that both the upper and lower states are split into Autle r-Townes doublets. Sub-Doppler resolution is achievable because the modified two-photon transition occurs contribu ting in the probe process and two-photon detunings, resulting from the Doppler shift, could be reduced by choosi ng appropriate optical geometry. A crucial role of the ratio of the frequencies of the coupled transitions is outli ned. The results obtained on the basis of the developed theory are accompanied with numerical simulation addresse d to real experimental schemes. Despite the decreased integral intensity, we predict enhanced laser-induced sub -Doppler absorption peaks along with transparency windows . The features are interpreted in the terms of quantum coheren ce and interference processes. The paper is organized into four sections. In the next sectio n, we present a four-level model and the density- matrix equations describing the system. The solution in the limit of a weak probe and steady-state condition is obtained and the absorption spectrum is then analyzed, first without Doppler broadening. In Sec. III, taking into consideration Doppler broadening, we demonstrate that the multiple sub-Doppler lines as well as enhanced absorption at the resonance could be obtained in this scheme. From numer ical illustrations of the effect in a practical medium, the conditions for and features of Doppler-free resonance, stipulated by compensation of Doppler shifts with light shifts are discussed. In Sec. IV, we summarize the results. II. MODEL AND ABSORPTION SPECTRUM AT HOMOGENEOUSLY BROADEN ED PROBE TRANSITION We consider a closed four-level scheme shown in Fig. 1(a). In this scheme two coherent driving fields EcandEd with Rabi frequencies Ω c=−Ec·d13/2¯hand Ω d=−Ed·d24/2¯hinteract with the transitions labeled |4/an}bracketri}ht − |2/an}bracketri}htand |3/an}bracketri}ht − |1/an}bracketri}ht, respectively. The transition |4/an}bracketri}ht − |1/an}bracketri}htis probed by the weak nonperturbating field Ep. Absorption index αp for this field, reduced by it’s value α0 0patωp=ω41, Ωc= Ω d= 0 is found as αp/α0 0p=Re{χp/χ0 0p}, where χpis 2corresponding dressed susceptibility. The later is conven ient to calculate with aid of dressed nonlinear polarizatio n PNLand density matrix ρijasPNL(ω4) =Nχ4E4/2 =Nρijdji(djiis transition electrodipole moment, N - number density of atoms). In the framework of semi- classical theor y and using the standard density matrix formalism with the rotating wave approximation, the description equation s of this scheme can be written in general form as: Lnnρnn=qn−i[V, ρ]nn+/summationtext m>nγmnρmm;L14ρ14=Lpρp=−i[V, ρ]14(etc.), (2.1) where Lij=d/dt+ Γij;V14= Ω p·exp{i∆pt}; Ω p=−Ep·d14/2¯h; ∆p=ωp−ω41(etc.) are frequency detunings from the corresponding resonance; Γ ij- homogeneous half-widths of transitions (in absence of col lisions Γ mn= (Γm+Γn)/2); Γ n=/summationtext jγnj- inverse lifetimes of levels; γmn- rate of relaxation from the level mton,qn=/summationtext jwnjrj - rate of incoherent exitation to a state nfrom the underlying levels. We represent density matrix elements as ρ14=rp·exp{i∆pt}, ρ33=r3etc. Then in a steady-state regime a set of density-matrix equation may be reduced to the set of algebra ic equations for the amplitudes rij. Analytical solution of this system of 10 coupled equation both for closed and open four-level scheme is given in [11,20]. In the case under consideration incoherent exitation of the upper levels as w ell as relaxation from the level 3 to 2 are supposed to be negligible small. Then r2=r4=rc= 0 and equation system (2.1) reduces to Pprp=iΩpr1+ir12Ωc−iΩdr34, P12r12=irpΩ∗ c−iΩdr32, (2.2) P34r34=−iΩ∗ drp+ir∗ dΩp+ir32Ωc, P23r23=−iΩcr43+ir21Ωd. (2.3) Pdrd=iΩd(r1−r3),Γ3r3=−2Re{iΩ∗ drd}, r1= 1−r3. (2.4) HereP14,13≡Pp,d= Γp,d+i∆p,d,P12= Γ12+i(∆p−∆c),P34= Γ34+i(∆p−∆d),P23= Γ23+i(∆c−∆p+ ∆ d). For atom moving with speed v, Doppler shift of resonances must be taken into account by su bstituting ∆ jfor ∆′ j= ∆ j−kjv. Under considered approximation solution for two level syst em|1/an}bracketri}ht − |3/an}bracketri}htis found apart of the other elements. rd=iΩdP∗ d Γ2 d(1 + æ d) + ∆2 d, r3=Γ2 dæ/2 Γ2 d(1 + æ) + ∆2 d,æ =4|Ωd|2 Γ3Γd. (2.5) Dressed susceptibility for the probe field is found in the not ations of [11,20] as: χp χ0 0p=Γp PpRp, Rp=r1(1 +g5+v5)−(r1−r3)(1 + g5−v6)g1 1 +g5+v5+g4(1 +g5−v6) +v4(1 +v5−g6), (2.6) g1=|Ωd|2 PdP34, g4=|Ωd|2 PpP34, g5=|Ωd|2 P12P∗ 23, g6=|Ωd|2 P34P∗ 23, v4=|Ωc|2 PpP12, v5=|Ωc|2 P34P∗ 23, v6=|Ωc|2 P12P∗ 23. At Ω d= 0 all gi= 0 and the equation (2.6)reduces to: αp α0 0p=ReΓp[Γ12+i(∆p−∆c)] (Γp+i∆p)[Γ12+i(∆p−∆c)] +|Ωc|2=−ReΓp[Γ12+i(∆p−∆c)] (∆p−δ1)(∆p−δ2), (2.7) δ1,2=∆c+i(Γ12+ Γp) 2∓/radicalbigg ∆c+i(Γ12−Γp) 2+|Ωc|2. (2.8) 3Following to [3], we introduce frequency-correlation fact or M1,2=dδ1,2 d∆c=1 2/bracketleftBigg 1∓∆c/radicalbig 4|Ωc|2+ ∆2c/bracketrightBigg . (2.9) The denominator in (2.7) displays two resonances. At Ω c→0 we obtain δ1→0+iΓp, δ2→∆c+iΓ12. This indicates one resonance at ∆ p= 0, the HWHM is Γ p, which corresponds to one-photon resonance with no correla tion with ωc (M1=dδ1/d∆c= 0). The second resonance at ∆ p= ∆ cis of HWHM Γ 12that corresponds to two-photon resonance, fully correlated with ωc(M2=dδ2/d∆c= 1). With growth of the coupling Rabi frequency Ω cthe resonance becomes split in two component, their frequency-correlation prope rties modify, and M1≈M2≈1/2 at|Ωc|2≫ {|∆c|2,Γ2 p,12}, which neither correspond to one- nor to two-photon processe s. HWHM of the resonances becomes also nearly equal to each other and to (Γ 12+Γp)/2. Note that the effects are determined by the coherence ρ12induced in the transition |1/an}bracketri}ht − |2/an}bracketri}ht, and that always M1+M2= 1. More detailed discussion can be found in [1–3,18]. In the alternative case Ω c= 0 all vi= 0 and the equation (2.6) reduces to: αp α0 0p=Re/braceleftbigg Γp[Γ34+i(∆p−∆d)]−(r1−r3)|Ωd|2/(Γp+i∆p) (Γp+i∆p)[Γ34+i(∆p−∆d)] +|Ωd|2/bracerightbigg . (2.10) The structure of the denominator is similar to (2.7) and dete rmined by the coherence ρ34. Additional term in the nominator is stipulated by the coherence induced at the tran sition |1/an}bracketri}ht−|3/an}bracketri}htwith the not zero populations of the levels unlike the transition |2/an}bracketri}ht − |4/an}bracketri}ht. This term is a source of the nonlinear interference effects ( NIEF) in absorption (gain) and refraction. Specific features of NIEF in coupled Doppler broadened Λ, Vand ladder schemes were explored in [2,19]. It has been outlined that frequency integrated abso rption index is proportional to r1−r4only, i.e. it’s change is determined only by the population change. As it was first ou tlined in [8,19], indeed NIEF give rise to difference in the line shapes of pure absorption and emission spectra. A s the consequence of this effect, the appearance of amplification without inversion on the base of NIEF has been p redicted. The features of the amplification without inversion were analyzed and illustrated for the model of neo n transitions in the early publication [8]. Specific feature of the case under consideration in this pape r is that both of the levels of the probe transition can be driven independently. This gives rise to multiple resona nce structure, corresponding to the roots of denominator in (2.6). If resonance splitting is much greater than their w idths, we can set Γ ij= 0, and the resonance values of ∆ p are described by the equation: [∆p−∆d−∆c][∆p(∆p−∆d)(∆p−∆c)−(∆p−∆c)Ω2 d−(∆p−∆d)Ω2 c]− −∆p[(∆p−∆d)Ω2 d+ (∆ p−∆c)Ω2 c] + (Ω2 d−Ω2 c)2= 0. (2.11) Basically, this equation possesses four roots, that indica tes appearance of four nonlinear resonances, determined by splitting of each of the levels |1/an}bracketri}htand|4/an}bracketri}htinto two quasi levels. In the case ∆ d=−∆c= ∆ resonance positions are given by the equation: ∆2 p= (∆2+ 2Ω2 d+ 2Ω2 c)/2±/radicalbig [(∆2+ 2Ω2 d+ 2Ω2c)/2]2−(Ω2 d−Ω2c)2. (2.12) 4At|Ωd|=|Ωc|=|Ω|two resonances merge in one not shifted resonance at ∆(1) p= 0, the other two resonances are given by ∆(2,3) p=±√ ∆2+ 4Ω2. (2.13) In the case ∆ d= ∆ c= 0 resonance positions are found as: ∆(1,2) p=±(|Ωd| − |Ωc|); ∆(3,4) p=±(|Ωd|+|Ωc|). (2.14) We begin our discussion with the case when the Doppler-broad ening is not included. Performing numerical calcula- tion for Eq. (6), we depict the absorption profiles in Fig.2. F rom Fig. 2(a) and 2(b), it is easy to find the typical EIT and absorption spectrum with |Ωd|= 0 (Fig. 2(a)) and |Ωc|= 0 (Fig.2(b)). Under increasing Rabi frequency |Ωc| (|Ωd|), the four-peak spectrum forms, when the driving fields beco me comparable to or larger than the spectral width Γpof the atomic transition. The emergence of the four-peak spe ctrum is attributed to the fact that levels |1/an}bracketri}htand |4/an}bracketri}hthave been driven into two dressed states (Fig. 1). As |Ωd|approaches |Ωc|, the four-peak spectrum degenerates into a three-peak spectrum since two dressed-state transit ions have the same resonant frequency and contribute to the same central component. As already known, a three-peak s pectrum occurs in resonance fluorescence (RF) in the strong field limit of a two-level system (for a review, see [1] ). Even though the dressed-state diagrams are similar in the two cases, the four-peak spectrum can not appear in RF bec ause in the case of RF the dynamic Stark splitting for the two doublets must be the same, while in our system the t wo doublet splittings are controlled separately by different driving field intensity and frequency. We would lik e to stress that the multiple EIT windows can appear simultaneously with the multiple absorption peaks. In Fig. 2(c), the absorption amplitude Aat ∆ p= 0 is plotted against the Rabi frequencies for two resonant driving fields . An important feature is that the maximum absorption occurs under the condition that the two Rabi frequencies are equal, which is due to the fact that the two dressed-state transitions simultaneously contribute to the central comp onent. This result may provide a way to measure the field intensity as well as atomic parameters. In the following Sec tion, we will proceed to analyze the absorption spectrum under effects of Doppler-broadening. III. COHERENCE INDUCED RESONANCES IN DOPPLER-BROADENED ME DIUM OF SODIUM DIMERS In the previous sections, Doppler broadening has not been ac counted for. In order to consider this effect, Doppler shifts must be introduced in the three interacting field reso nance detunings in Eq. (2.6). We shall illustrate major outcomes of the paper with numeric al simulations addressed to the conditions of the experiment [21]. Transitions |1/an}bracketri}ht − |3/an}bracketri}ht − |2/an}bracketri}ht − |4/an}bracketri}ht − |1/an}bracketri}htin Fig.1a are attributed to those of the sodium dimers Na2: X′Σ+ g(v” = 0 , J” = 45) −A′Σ+ u(6,45)(λd= 655 nm)−X1Σ+ g(14,45)(λ32= 756 nm)−B1Πu(5,45)(λc= 532 nm)−X′Σ+ g(0,45)(λp= 480 nm). The Doppler widths of the transition at wavelength λp= 480 nmat the temperature 5about 450 C is 2 Dp≈1.7 GHz. Then the Boltzmann’s population of the level |2/an}bracketri}htmakes about 1.5% from that of the level|1/an}bracketri}ht. The following relaxation parameters are used: Γ 4= 200, Γ 2= 30, Γ 3= 260, γ42= 2,γ41= 4,γ32= 20, γ31= 10, Γ 12= 40, Γ c= 110, Γ p= 110, Γ 34= 130, Γ 23= 140, Γ d= 140, (all in 106s−1). For numerical simulation we have used the full set of the equations from [11,20], accou nting for various relaxation transitions and not zero population of the level |2/an}bracketri}ht. Fig. 3 depicts absorption spectrum for the molecules with th e velocity projection on the propagation direction of the coupled fields v= 0. The plots illustrate dependencies, described by the equ ations (2.12) - (2.14). The appearance of the four-peak spectrum is attributed to the fact that leve ls|1/an}bracketri}htand|4/an}bracketri}hthave been driven into two dressed states. Direct computing shows that frequency integral absorption for the plot 3 is the same as for 5, whereas for the other plots it is about 0.5 of that for the graph 5. This is due to stro ng saturation of population difference at the transition |1/an}bracketri}ht–|3/an}bracketri}ht. Figure 4 displays same dependencies, but for velocity avera ged absorption index and co-propagating probe and driving fields. While number of peaks and their positions are identical to the previous case, the specific feature of the inhomogeneous broadening is that plot 1 displays enhanc ed absorption in the central component despite the fact that integral intensity of this graph is about 2 times less th an that for the plot 4 (due to the strong saturation of the populations at the transition |1/an}bracketri}ht–|3/an}bracketri}ht). In absence of driving fields only small fraction of the mole cules (about Γp/Dp≈10−3) can be coupled by probe field. Overlap of the two dressed tran sitions gives rise to increased amount of the molecules coupled with the probe field and consequentl y to enhanced absorption as compared to not perturbed absorption in the center of Doppler broadened transition. As it was shown in [3], resonance requirements for molecules at velocity vand at max{|Ωd|2,∆d|2} ≫kdu(uis thermal velocity, kd- wave number) are described by the equation ∆p−kpv=δ1,2−M1,2kdv. (3.1) The equation indicates that cancellation of Doppler shifts is possible even at kp/ne}ationslash=kd, ifkp< kd. This is due to the interplay of the Doppler and ac Stark shifts giving rise to va riation of M1in the interval 0...1/2, whereas M2– in the interval 1...1/2. Possible enhancements of cross-section of optical processes through concurrent coupling of molecu les from wide velocity interval by means of the above outlined ap proach are shown in Fig. 5. The frequencies of the probe and Edfields are interchanged (see Fig. 1b), all other relaxation p arameters remain the same. Plot 1 displays enhanced sub-Doppler resonances with the FWHM comparable w ith the natural linewidth (see insets (a),(b))for co- propagating wave. Dramatic change as compared to similar gr aphs in Fig. 5 is explicitly seen. The other plots show evolution of the structures with variation of the inten sity of one of the driving field. As plot 4 indicates, the sub-Doppler structures exist only under certain ratio of th e driving field intensities. Even more dramatic change occurs while driving fields (especially shorter wavelength one) are counter propagating (see inset (c)). 6IV. CONCLUSION In conclusion, we have explored spectral properties of the m olecular transitions in the case that both upper and lower levels are coupled to other atomic levels and Doppler e ffects play important role. The features of the four-peak or three-peak spectra induced by the driving fields are inves tigated. Despite the dominated Doppler-broadening, two or more peaks may possess the sub-Doppler resolusion. A cruc ial role of the ratio of the frequencies of the coupled transition is shown. With manipulation the detunings and/o r intensities of two coupling fields, one can improve the spectral resolution. The enhanced absorption in the sub-Do ppler peak is shown to be realized, whereas the peak can be induced in the center of the inhomogeneously broadene d transition. The predicted effects are attributed to the quantum coherence and interference processes, while fr equency-correlation properties of multi-photon processe s experience substantial modification with the growth of the d riving fields intensities, which leads to corresponding dramatic changes of the role of Doppler effects. The similar sub-Doppler technique can also be implemented f or other atomic coherence effects, such as EIT, LWI and for enhancing various resonant nonlinear optical pheno mena in inhomogeneously broadened media. In one of our previous papers [22], the inversionless amplification has b een considered with the important feature that incoherent excitation to the upper level is not necessary in the same sch eme as considered in this letter. Similar scheme is often used in quantum optics. Most recently, electromagnet ically induced absorption was studied in a similar four- level system [23]. We believe that, by utilizing this sub-Do ppler technique, the above effects in inhomengeneously broadened media can be further enhanced and manipulated. V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS One of the authors, Jin-Yue Gao, would like to acknowledge th e support from NSF in China, the research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education in China, Educa tion Department of China, and DFG in Germany. A.K.Popov acknowledges support from the Russian (grant 99- 02-39003) and Krasnoyarsk Regional Foundations for Basic Research, from the Center on Fundamental Natural Scie nces at St. Petersburg University and INTAS (INTAS- 99-19). He greatfully acknowledge support of his visit in Ge rmany from Institute of Quantum Optics of Hannover University and along with Jin-Yue Gao would like cordially t hank B. Wellegehausen for hospitality and stimulating discussions. The authors thank S.A. Myslivets for valuable assistance in numerical simulation. 7[1] S.G.Rautian and A.M.Shalagin, Kinetic Problems of Nonlinear Spectroscopy (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991). [2] A.K.Popov, Introduction in Nonlinear Spectroscopy , Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1983 (in Russ). [3] The principles of sub-Doppler nonlinear laser spectros copy and their interrelation with modification of frequency -correlation properties of multi-photon processes with the growth of the intensity of the driving field were considered in: T.Ya.Popo va, A.K.Popov, S.G.Rautian and A.A.Feoktistov, Sov. Phys. JET P,30, 243 (1970) [Translated from Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 57, 444 (1969)]. [4] V.S.Letokhov and V.P.Chebotaev, Nonlinear Spectroscopy , (Springer- Verlag, 1977). [5] C. Cohen-Tannoudji, et al., Opt. Comm. 27, 71 (1978); S. Reynaud, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 756 (1979); S. Reynaud, et al., Opt. Comm. 42, 39 (1982). [6] A.K.Popov and L.N. Talashkevich, Optics Comm., 28,315 (1979); A.K. Popov and V.M. Shalaev, Optics Comm., 35,189 (1980); A.K. Popov and V.M. Shalaev, Opt. Spectrosc., 49, 336 (1981) [Transl. from Opt.Spektrosk. 49, 617 (1980)]; A.K. Popov and V.M. Shalaev, Sov. J. Quant. Electr. 12, 289 (1982) [Transl. from Kvant. Electr. 9, 488 (1982)]. [7] S.E. Harris, J.E. Field, and A. Imamoˇ glu, Phys. Rev. Let t.64, 1107 (1990); K.-J. Boller, A. Imamoˇ glu, and S.E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2593(1991); J.E. Field, K.H. Hahn, and S.E. Harris, Phys. R ev. Lett. 67, 3062 (1991). [8] The effect of AWI was proposed and numerically illustrate d for three level Vscheme of neon transitions in: T.Ya.Popova, A.K.Popov, Zhurn.Prikl. Spektrosk., 12, No 6, 989, (1970) [Translated in Engl.: Journ. Appl. Spectr ,12, No 6, 734, (1973); T.Ya.Popova, A.K.Popov, Izv.Vysh. Uchebn. Zaved. , Fizika, No 11, 38, (1970) [Translated in Engl.: Soviet Phys. Journ., 13, No 11, 1435, (1973)]; also considered in [2]; a review of the early theoretical and experimental studies of nonlinear interference effects in Doppler broade ned media with special consideration of AWI can be found also in: A.K.Popov and S.G.Rautian, Proc. SPIE, 2798 (”Coherent Phenomena and Amplification without Inversion” , A.V.Andreev, O.Kocharovskaya and P.Mandel, Editors), 49 ( 1996); A.K.Popov, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci., Physics, 60, 927 (1996) [Transl. from: Izvestiya RAN, ser. Fiz., 60, 92 (1996)]. [9] O. Kocharovskaya and Ya. I . Khanin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 90, 1610 (1986); S.E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1033 (1989); M.O. Scully, S. Y. Zhu and A. Gavrielides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2813 (1989); J. Y. Gao, et. al, Opt. Commun. 93, 323 (1992). [10] A.K. Popov and B. Wellegehausen, Laser Physics, 6, 364 (1996); A.K. Popov, V.M. Kuchin, and S.A. Myslivets, JE TP, 86, 244 (1998). [11] A. K. Popov, Proc. SPIE, 3485, 252 (1998); also in : Physics of Vibrations ,6(1), 50 (1998) ed. F.V.Bunkin, Allerton Press, Inc., New York, USA. [12] M.O. Scully, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1855 (1991); M. Fleischhauer, C. H. Keitel, and M.O. Scully , Chang Su, B. T. Ulrich, Shi-Yao Zhu, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1468 (1992); Han-Zhuang Zhang, Xiu-Zhen Guo, Jin-Yue Gao, Yun Jiang, Guang-Xu Jin, Z. Phys. D 42, 83 (1997). [13] M.Scully, Phys. Rep., 219, 191 (1992); O.Kocharovskaya, ibid, 175 (1992); B.G. Levi, Physics Today, 17 (May 1992); P.Mandel, Contemp. Phys., 34, 235 (1993); M.O.Scully and M.Fleischhauer, Science, 63, 337 (1994); S.E.Harris, Physics Today, 52, 36 (1997). [14] G. Vemuri, G.S. Agarwal, and B.D. Nageswara Rao, Phys. R ev. A53, 2842 (1996). [15] Yifu Zhu and T.N. Wasserlauf, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3653 (1996). [16] De-Zhong, Wang and Jin-Yue Gao Phys. Rev. A 52, 3201 (1996); G.S. Agarwal and W. Harshawardhan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1039 (1996); G. Vemuri, G.S. Agarwal, and B.D. Nageswara Ra o, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3695 (1996). [17] Po Dong and Jin-Yue Gao, Phys. Lett. A 265, 52 (2000). [18] A.S. Baev and A.K. Popov, JETP Lett. 67, 1018 (1998); 69, 110 (1999); A.K. Popov and V.M. Shalaev, Phys. Rev. A 59, R946 (1999); A.S. Baev, A.K. Popov, S.A. Myslivets, and V.M. Shalaev, Proc. SPIE, 3736, 279 (1999). [19] Nonlinear interference effects in quantum transitions and various feasibilities manipulating lineshape of optic al transitions with control fields both for discreete and continuum states, including formation of sign-changing profiles and transpar ency, taking into account Doppler broadening and collisions, wer e considered in details in early publication: T.Ya. Popova, A.K.Popov, S.G.Rautian, R.I.Sokolovskii, JETP, 30, 466, 1970 [Translated from Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 57, 850, 1969]; also in [2](for review see refs. [1,8,11] above.) [20] A.K.Popov and S.A.Myslivets, Quantum Electron., 27(11), 1004 (1997); 28(2), 185 (1998) [Transl. from Kvant. Elektron., 24(11), 1033 (1997); 25(2),192 (1998)]. [21] A. Apolonskii, S. Baluschev, U. Hinze, E. Tiemann and B. Wellegehausen, Appl. Phys. B 64, 435 (1997); S. Babin, E. V. Podivilov, D. A. Shapiro, U. Hinze, E. Tiemann and B. Welle gehausen, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1355 (1999). [22] Po Dong, Weining Man and Jin-Yue Gao, Phys. Lett. A 265, 43 (2000). [23] A.V. Taichenachev, A.M. Tumaikin, and V.I. Yudin, Phys . Rev. A 61, 011802 (2000). 8FIG. 1. The energy level schemes under consideration. FIG. 2. Absorption spectrum at homogeneously broadened pro be transition |1/angbracketright − |4/angbracketrightcontrolled with two driving field. αp – absorption index, reduced by it’s resonant value at both dr iving fields being turned off. The atomic parameters used are: Γ31= Γ p; Γ43= 2Γ p; Γ21= 0.1Γp; Γ42= Γ p. We choose ∆ c= ∆ d= 0. (a) |Ωc|= 5Γ p. (b) |Ωd|= 5Γ p. (c) ∆ p= 0. FIG. 3. Absorption spectrum at homogeneously broadened pro be transition |1/angbracketright−|4/angbracketright(for molecules at velocity v=0) controlled with two driving field. α4– absorption index, reduced by it’s resonant value at both dr iving fields being turned off, ∆ p=ωp−ω41 – resonance detuning of the week probe field. Detunings of bot h driving fields ∆ d=ωd−ω31= ∆ c=ωc−ω42= 0; coupling Rabi frequencies are as follows: 1 – (dash-dot) Ω d= 120 MHz, Ω c= 200 MHz; 2 – (solid) Ω d= Ω c= 120 MHz; 3 – (dash) Ωd= 0, Ω c= 120 MHz; 4 – (dot) Ω d= 120 MHz, Ω c= 0; 5 – (solid) Ω d= Ω c= 0. FIG. 4. Absorption spectrum at inhomogeneously broadened p robe transition |1/angbracketright − |4/angbracketright(Fig. 1a) controlled with two driving field. All fields are co-propagating, α4– velocity averaged absorption index, reduced by it’s reson ant value at both driving fields being turned off. The other notations are the same as in F ig. 3. ∆ d= ∆ c= 0, Ω c= 1 GHz, Ω d– as follows: 1 – (solid) Ωd= 1 GHz; 2 – (dash) Ω d= 0.7 GHz; 3 – (dot) Ω d= 0.3 GHz; 4 – (solid)– Ω c= Ω d= 0. FIG. 5. Compensation of residual Doppler broadening and sub -Doppler structures at the probe transition |1/angbracketright − |4/angbracketright(Fig. 1b) coherently driven with two strong fields. Main plot – all field s are co-propagating, 1 – 3 — all parameters and notations are the same as in Fig. 4. 4 – (dash-dot): Ω d= 0.075 GHz. Insets (a) and (b) are corresponding zoomed peaks. I nset (c) — same as plot 1 but: 1 — only field cis counter propagating; 2 — only field dis counter propagating; 3 — both driving fields are counter-propagating in respect to the probe field. 9Ωd |1〉 |2〉 |3〉 |4〉 ΩcΩpa |1〉 |2〉 |4〉 |3〉 ΩpΩcΩdb −0.4 −0.3 −0.2 −0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.400.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91α4 ∆p, GHz1 2 3 4 5 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 300.20.40.60.811.21.4α4 /α40 ∆p, GHz1 2 3 4 −2.5−2−1.5−1−0.5 00.511.522.50123456 −2.2−2.1−2−1.900.511.522.5 −0.2−0.100.10.2024 −4−202400.10.20.30.4 ∆p, GHzα4 /α401 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 a b c

arXiv:physics/0005061v1 [physics.ins-det] 23 May 2000SUPERHEATED DROP NEUTRON SPECTROMETER Mala Das, B. K. Chatterjee, B. Roy and S.C. ROY Department of Physics, Bose Institute, Calcutta 700009, In dia 1.Introduction: The Superheated Drop Detector or SDD invented by Apfel in 197 9[1] is one of the useful detector in neutron detection. The basic princ iple of operation of this detector is same as bubble chamber. Here the superheated dro ps are suspended in dust free visco-elastic gel medium. Upon nucleation by e ner getic radiations the drops form bubbles and the drops nucleate independent of each othe r. So one nucleation does not consume the whole liquid and the repressurisation p rocess that is needed in bubble chamber, is not required here. This is an advantage of SDD over bubble chamber. Each of the drops store mechanical energy in it and i t is released when triggered by radiations. The superheated liquid can be prep ared by increasing the temperature of the liquid at a given pressure or alternative ly it can be prepared by lowering the pressure of the liquid at a given temperature. T his detector can be made on polymer matrix also where the bubbles formed after nu cleation of drops are tightly bound as was done by Ing and his group, called the ”Bub ble Detector” (BD). Here the nucleation is observed by counting visually the num ber of bubbles trapped in the gel[2]. The test liquid remains in glass tube under pre ssure created by another liquid and just before the experiment, the liquid is sensiti zed by unscrewing the cap of the tube and allow the liquid to become superheated. These SDD/BD serves as an excellent detector for the detection of neutrons. There are different detecting systems by which the nucleation in SDD can be measured. One way is to co unt acoustically the pulses produced by drops vaporization with the help of a piez o electric transducer and a drop counter[3]. Another way is to measure the volume of the vapor formed upon nucleation by a passive method. This system consists of vert ical graduated pipette[4] or horizontal glass tubes placed on a graduated platform[5, 6] with an indicator (gel piston or coloured water column) indicating the volume of th e vapor formed upon nucleation. The sensitivity of this type of detector can be v aried by changing the diameter of the glass tube. This system does not require any p ower source and can be used as an alarm dosimeter, in area monitoring etc. The thi rd way is to count visually the bubbles trapped in hard polymer matrix[2]. The suitability of using superheated drops as a neutron dosimeter[7,8,9,10] has alr eady been established. It is a very sensitive neutron dosimeter and can measure the neu tron dose as low as 0.1µSv. The SDD/BD neutron dosimeters are now commercially avai lable from Apfel Enterprises Inc, USA and from Bubble Technology Industries Ltd., Canada. 12. Principle of neutron spectrometry : Since its discovery, attempts have been made on the applicat ion of this de- tector in neutron spectrometry. There is a minimum energy re quired for nucleation at a given temperature below which no nucleation occurs. Thi s minimum energy is called the threshold energy for nucleation. The threshold e nergy decreases as the degree of superheat of the liquid increases. The degree of su perheat of a liquid is the difference between the vapor pressure of the liquid at a gi ven temperature and the ambient pressure or the difference between the boiling po int of the liquid and the ambient temperature. Therefore liquid with lower boili ng point possess higher degree of superheat at a given temperature and as the ambient temperature increases the liquid becomes more and more superheated. This property of the superheated liquid is being utilized to develop the neutron spectrometr y. There are different ways by which superheated drops can be used in neutron spectromet ry. One of the ways is to use the different superheated liquids of different degre e of superheat and the threshold neutron energies can be obtained by irradiating t he detectors with dif- ferent monochromatic neutron sources [11]. Other way is to u se the same detector operating at different temperature. Since the threshold ene rgy depends on the op- erating temperature of the detector, so by varying the tempe rature of the detector suitably, neutrons of different energies can be detected as w as done by d’Errico et. al.[12]. They have used two superheated liquids operating a t four different tempera- tures to obtain eight different threshold neutron energies . It is to be noted that in order to get a good resolution of the spectrum, temperature v ariation at a close grid is necessary. 3. Present work : Now there is a different approach by which the neutron energy spectrum can be obtained from the temperature dependence of threshold energy of SDD. After the interactions of the neutrons with the nuclei o f the constituting atoms of superheated liquid, ions of different energies are formed . The ion having the highest value of LET (dE/dx) in the liquid, will play the major role in nucleation. Another important point is that there is a specific length L, along the ions track, the energy (Ec) deposited over that length will contribute significant rol e in nucleation. Actually a very small fraction of the deposited energy is usually used up in nucleation i.e. W/ Ec is very small and this ratio is called the thermodynamic effici ency of nucleation ((T). After the deposition of energy by the ions, nucleation occur s with the formation of a critical size vapor bubble of radius rc inside the liquid dro p. It is suggested that L = 2rc[13,14] and Eccan be expressed as Ec= 2rcdE/dx Therefore,W = ηTEcor W = 2ηTrcdE/dx or W/rc= k dE/dx, where k = 2 ηTW andrcboth are functions of tempera- ture and dE/dx is a function of the energy of the projectile io ns in superheated liquid, 2which can be converted to the energy of the incident neutrons . So this equation re- lates the threshold neutron energy for nucleation to the amb ient temperature. This enables one to convert the temperature of the detector to the energy of the incident neutrons. Therefore using the above equation as a working eq uation, neutron energy spectrum can be obtained by observing the SDD response at diff erent temperature. This gives an important application of SDD in neutron spectr ometry. The nucleation rate in superheated drops is proportional to the total volum e of the drops (V), inci- dent neutron flux ψ, neutron-nucleus interaction cross section σand to the neutron detection efficiency ηof SDD. Neutron detection efficiency η, is defined as the fraction of the incident neutrons which are used up in nucleation. By o bserving the nucleation rate in superheated drops, ηcan be obtained from the known values of V, ψandσ. If one measures ηat different temperatures, the derivative of ηagainst temperature resembles the neutron energy spectrum of the source. The tem perature axis can be converted to the neutron energy following the method discus sed here. For a given neutron energy spectrum, at low temperature only the high en ergy neutrons take part in nucleation and as temperature increases, threshold energy decreases and so in addition to the high energy neutrons, low energy neutrons ar e also detected. So for a polychromatic source, ηshould increase with temperature. When all the neutrons in the spectrum contribute in nucleation, ηshould be constant with temperature be- cause no more neutrons are left to be detected. For a monochro matic source, there is only one sharp increase of ηat a particular temperature corresponding to the energy and it should be constant for the other temperatures. This de tector can be made sensitive to different ranges of neutron energies as the user s choice by varying the temperature of the liquid. This detector can detect neutron s with energies ranging from thermal to fast energy. We have tested the present princ iple of spectrometry with a 3 Ci Am-Be neutron source[15]. The temperature was var ied from -17oCto about 60oCwith the help of an indigenously made temperature controlle r. There is a fair agreement between the neutron energy spectrum of Am -Be obtained from our experiment and the available spectrum of the source. The main advantage of this type of spectrometer is that it is easy to prepare, low co st of the materials and no need of power supply. Nowadays, Superheated Drop Detecto rs are widely used in the determination of neutron spectra in space, at high alt itude studies, gamma detection, detection of radon, for cold dark matter search, charged particle detection etc. Besides these applications, the radiation induced nuc leation in superheated drop detector is itself a very interesting field of research. References :- 1. R. E. Apfel (1979) U. S. Patent 4,143,274. 2. H. Ing and H. C. Birnboim (1984) Nucl. Tracks and Rad. Meas. 8, 285. 3. R. E. Apfel and S. C. Roy (1983) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 54, 1397. 4. R. E. Apfel (1992) Rad. Prot. Dos. 44, 343. 5. B. Roy, B. K. Chatterjee, Mala Das and S. C. Roy (1998) Rad. P hys. Chem. 51, 3473. 6. Mala Das, B. Roy, B. K. Chatterjee and S. C. Roy (1999) Rad. M eas. 30, 35. 7. R. E. Apfel and S. C. Roy (1984) Nucl. Inst. Meth. 219, 582. 8. R. E. Apfel and Y. C. Lo (1989) Health Phys. 56, 79. 9. S. C. Roy, R. E. Apfel and Y. C. Lo (1987) Nucl. Inst. Meth. A2 55, 199. 10. H. Ing (1986) Nuclear Tracks 12, 49. 11. H. Ing, R. A. Noulty and T. D. Mclean (1995) Rad. Meas. 27, 1 . 12. F. dErrico Rad. Prot. Dos. (1995) Rad. Prot. Dos. 61, 159. 13. R. E. Apfel, S. C. Roy and Y. C. Lo (1985) Phys. Rev. A 31, 319 4. 14. M. J. Harper and M. E. Nelson (1990) Rad. Prot. Dos. 47, 535 . 15. Mala Das, B. K. Chatterjee, B. Roy and S. C. Roy (1999) Nucl . Inst. Meth A (submitted). 4

arXiv:physics/0005062v1 [physics.data-an] 23 May 2000Applying MDL to Learning Best Model Granularity∗ Qiong Gao† Chinese Academy of SciencesMing Li‡ University of California, Santa Barbara Paul M.B. Vit´ anyi§ CWI and University of Amsterdam Abstract The Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle is solidly b ased on a provably ideal method of inference using Kolmogorov comple xity. We test how the theory behaves in practice on a general problem in model s election: that of learning the best model granularity. The performance of a model depends critically on the granularity, for example the choice of pre cision of the param- eters. Too high precision generally involves modeling of ac cidental noise and too low precision may lead to confusion of models that should be distinguished. This precision is often determined ad hoc. In MDL the best mod el is the one that most compresses a two-part code of the data set: this emb odies “Occam’s Razor.” In two quite different experimental settings the the oretical value de- termined using MDL coincides with the best value found exper imentally. In the first experiment the task is to recognize isolated handwr itten characters in one subject’s handwriting, irrespective of size and orient ation. Based on a new modification of elastic matching, using multiple prototype s per character, the optimal prediction rate is predicted for the learned parame ter (length of sam- pling interval) considered most likely by MDL, which is show n to coincide with the best value found experimentally. In the second experime nt the task is to model a robot arm with two degrees of freedom using a three lay er feed-forward neural network where we need to determine the number of nodes in the hidden ∗Parts of this work were presented at IJCAI, 1989, and at ESANN , 1994. †Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Beijing, China. ‡Supported in part by ONR Grant N00014-85-K-0445 and ARO Gran t DAAL03-86-K-0171 at Harvard University, by NSERC operating grant OGP-0036747 a t York University, and by NSERC operating grant OGP-046506 at the University of Waterloo. A ddress: Computer Science Depart- ment, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, US A—On leave from the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. Email: mli@cs.ucsb.edu §Partially supported by the European Union through 4th Frame work NeuroCOLT II Working Group EP 27150, the 5th Framework QAIP Project IST-1999-112 34, the 5th Framework Network of Excellence QUIPROCONE IST-1999-29064, the COLORET Workin g Group, the European Science Foundation, and by an NSERC International Scientific Exchan ge Award ISE0125663. Address: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Kruislaan 413, 1098 S J Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: paulv@cwi.nl 1layer giving best modeling performance. The optimal model ( the one that ex- trapolizes best on unseen examples) is predicted for the num ber of nodes in the hidden layer considered most likely by MDL, which again is fo und to coincide with the best value found experimentally. 1 Introduction It is commonly accepted that all learning involves compress ion of experimental data in a compact ‘theory’ , ‘hypothesis’, or ‘model’ of the pheno menon under inves- tigation. In [27, 11] the last two authors analysed the theor y of such approaches related to shortest effective description length (Kolmogor ov complexity). The ques- tion arises whether these theoretical insights can be direc tly applied to real world problems. Selecting models on the basis of compression prop erties ignores the ‘mean- ing’ of the models. Therefore we should aim at optimizing a mo del parameter that has no direct semantics, such as the precision at which we rep resent the other pa- rameters: too high precision causes accidental noise to be m odeled as well, too low precision may cause models that should be distinct to be conf used. In two quite dif- ferent experimental settings the theoretically predicted values are shown to coincide with the best values found experimentally. In general, the performance of a model for a given data sample depends critically on what we may call the “degree of discretization” or the “gra nularity” of the model: the choice of precision of the parameters, the number of node s in the hidden layer of a neural network, and so on. The granularity is often determi ned ad hoc. Here we give a theoretical method to determine optimal granularity based on an application of the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle in superv ised learning. The cost of describing a set of data with respect to a particular m odel is the sum of the lengths of the model description and the description of t he data-to-model error. According to MDL the best model is one with minimum cost, that is, the model that explains the data in the most concise way. The first two authors, in [5], carried out an experiment in on- line learning to recognize isolated alphanumerical characters written in o ne subject’s handwriting, irrespective of size and orientation. Some novel features h ere are the use of multiple prototypes per character, and the use of the MDL principle to choose the optimal feature extraction interval. It is satisfactory that in thi s case the general learning theory can without much ado be applied to obtain the best samp ling rate. We believe that the same method is applicable in a wide range of p roblems. To obtain evidence for this assertion, in [3] the third author with G. t e Brake and J. Kok applied the same method to modeling a robot-arm. The genesis of this work is not rooted in traditional approac hes to artificial intelligence (AI), but rather on new exciting general learn ing theories which have developed out from the computational complexity theory [26 , 25], statistics and descriptional (Kolmogorov) complexity [17]. These new the ories have received great 2attention in theoretical computer science and statistics, [26, 25, 17, 19, 18, 20, 7]. On the other hand, the design of real learning systems seems t o be dominated by ad hoc trial-and-error methods. Applications of these recent the oretical results to real world learning system design are scarce and far between . One exception is the elegant paper by Quinlan and Rivest, [16]. In a companion paper [27] we develop the theory and mathemati cal validation of the MDL principle [1] based on ultimate data compression u p to the Kolmogorov complexity. Our purpose here is trying to bring theory and pr actice together by testing the theory on simple real applications. We give a bri ef accessible exposition of the theoretical background of MDL and the mathematical pr oof that it works. The principle is then applied to two distinct practical issu es: that of on-line char- acter recognition and of robot modeling. In both cases the is sue is the supervised learning of best model granularity for classification or ext rapolation on unseen ex- amples. The systems and experiments are quite simple, and ar e intended to just be demonstrations that the theoretical approach works in prac tice. Both applications are in topical areas and the results give evidence that the th eoretical approach can be extended to more demanding settings. Contents: From a theoretical point of view we explain the general model ing principle of MDL and its relation to Bayesianism. We show tha t the MDL theory is solidly based on a provably ideal method of inference using K olmogorov complexity and demonstrate that it is valid under the assumption that th e set of data is “typical” (in a precise rigorous sense) for the targeted model. We then apply the theory to two experimental tasks that both concern supervised learni ng of the best model granularity but are otherwise quite dissimilar: In the first task we want to obtain the best model sampling rate in the design of an on-line hand- written character learning system, and in the second task our goal is to determi ne the best number of nodes in the hidden layer of a three-layer feedforward neu ral network modeling a robot arm with two degrees of freedom. It turns out that the th eoretically predicted optimal precision coincides with the best experimentally d etermined precision. We conclude with a discussion concerning the equivalence of co de-length based methods with probability-based methods, that is, of MDL and Bayesia nism. 1.1 Introduction to Learning On-Line Handwritten Characte rs One of the important aspects of AI research is machine cognit ion of various aspects of natural human languages. An enormous effort has been inves ted in the problem of recognizing isolated handwritten characters or charact er strings, [23]. Recog- nizing isolated hand-written characters has applications , for example, in signature recognition and Chinese character input. The alphanumeric al character learning experiment reported here is a pilot project which ultimatel y aims at providing a practicable method to learn Chinese characters. This probl em knows many practi- cal difficulties—both quantitatively and qualitatively. 3There are several thousand independent Chinese characters . No current key- board input method is natural enough for casual users. Some o f these methods require the user to memorize a separate code for each of seven thousand characters. Some methods require the user to know ping ying —the phonological representation of mandarin Chinese in latin characters. But then the transl ation into computer representation of characters is not easy because there are t oo many homonyms. Similarly, sound recognition techniques do not help much ei ther because almost every commonly used Chinese character has more than one commonly u sed homonym. For non-professional casual users, hand-written input which i s mechanically scanned and processed, seems to be a quite reasonable way of entering dat a into the computer. A variety of approaches and algorithms have been proposed to achieve a high recognition rate. The recognition process is usually divid ed into two steps: 1. feature extraction from the sample characters, and 2. classification of unknown characters. The latter often uses either deterministic or statistical i nference based on the sample data, and various known mathematical and statistica l approaches can be used. Our contribution is on that level. This leaves the tech nical problem of feature extraction, whose purpose is to capture the essence from the raw data. The state of the art is more like art than science. Here we use existing met hods which we explain now. 1.1.1 Feature Extraction The most common significant features extracted are center of gravity, moments, dis- tribution of points, character loci, planar curve transfor mation, coordinates, slopes and curvatures at certain points along the character curve. The obvious difficulty of the recognition task is the variability involved in handw ritten characters. Not only does the shape of the characters depend on the writing st yle which varies from person to person, but even for the same person trying to write consistently writing style changes with time. One way to deal with this problem is the idea of ‘elastic match ing’ [10, 24]. Roughly speaking, the elastic matching method takes the coo rdinates or slopes of certain points approximately equally spaced along the curv e of the character drawing as feature to establish the character prototypes. To classi fy an unknown character drawing, the machine compares the drawing with all the proto types in its knowledge base according to some distance function and the entered cha racter is classified as the character represented by the closest prototype. When an unknown character is compared to a prototype, the comparison of the features is no t only made strictly between the corresponding points with the prototype but als o with the points ad- jacent to the corresponding point in the prototype. The meth od we use for feature extraction is a new modification of the standard elastic matc hing method. 41.1.2 Classification Each implemented algorithm for character recognition embo dies a model or a family of models for character recognition. One problem of the exta nt research is the lack of a common basis for evaluation and comparison among va rious techniques. This is especially true for on-line character recognition d ue to the lack of common standard and limited raw data source. A model from a family of models induced by a particular method of feature extraction is usually specifi ed by a set of parameters. Varying the parameters gives a class of models with similar c haracteristics. Consider the above mentioned elastic matching. It uses cert ain points along the character curve as features. The interval size used to extra ct these points along the curve is a parameter. How to determine the value of this param eter which gives optimal recognition? Practically speaking, we can set the interval size to differe nt values and experi- ment on a given sample set of data to see which value gives the b est performance. However, since the experiment is based on one particular set of data, we do not know if this interval size value gives a similar optimal perf ormance for all possible observations from the same data source. A theory is needed to guide the parameter selection in order to obtain the best model from the given cla ss of models. 1.1.3 Model Selection Suppose we have models M1,M2,.... Let Hibe the hypothesis ‘ Migives the best recognition rate’. Our problem in selecting the best model c onsists in finding the most likely hypothesis. We use the Minimum Description Length principle (referred as MDL hereafter) for this purpose. MDL finds its root in the we ll-known Bayesian inference and not so well-known Kolmogorov complexity. Below we give the classic “Bayes’s rule.” According to Bayes ’s rule, a specific hypothesis is preferred if the probability of that hypothes is takes maximum value for a given set of data and a given prior probability distribu tion over the set of hypotheses. This happens for the hypothesis under which the product of the condi- tional probability of the data for the given hypothesis and t he prior probability of the hypothesis is maximal. When we take the negative logarit hm of Bayes’s formula, then this maximal probability is achieved by the hypothesis under which the sum of the following two terms is minimized: the description lengt h of the error of the data for the given hypothesis and the description length of the mo del (the hypothesis). Therefore, finding a maximum value of the conditional probab ility of a given set of hypotheses and data becomes minimizing the combined comple xity or description length of the error and the model for a given set of candidate m odels. To quantify this idea, the two description lengths are expre ssed in terms of the coding length of the model (set of prototypes) and the coding length of the error (combined length of all data failed to be described by the mod el). The trade-off 5between simplicity and complexity of both quantities is as f ollows. 1. If a model is too simple, in the sense of having too short an e ncoding, it may fail to capture the essence of the mechanism generating the d ata, resulting in increased error coding lengths. 2. If a model is too complicated, in the sense of having too lon g code length (like when it consists of a table of all data), it may contain a lot of redundance from the data and become too sensitive to minor irregulariti es to give accurate predictions of the future data. The MDL principle states that among the given set of models, t he one with the minimum combined description lengths of both the model and t he error for given set of data is the best approximation of the mechanism behind data and can be used to predict the future data with best accuracy. The objective of this work is to implement a small system whic h learns to rec- ognize handwritten alphanumericals based on both elastic m atching and statistical inference. MDL is used to guide the model selection, specific ally the selection of the interval of feature extraction. The result is then tested ex perimentally to validate the application of the theory. 1.2 Introduction to Modeling a Robot Arm We consider the problem of modeling a robot arm consisting of two joints and two stiff limbs connected as: joint, limb, joint, limb. The entir e arm moves in a fixed two-dimensional plane. The first joint is fixed at the origin. The position of the other end of the arm is determined by the lengths of the two lim bs, together with the angle of rotation in the first joint of the first limb, and th e angle of rotation in the second joint of the second limb with respect to the first limb. The mobile end of the arm thus has two degrees of freedom given by the two a ngles. In [13] this problem is modeled using a Bayesian framework to obtain a backpropagation network model. We use MDL to obtain the best number of nodes in the hidden layer of a three layer feedforward network model. The method is ess entially the same as in the character recognition experiment. Just as before it i s validated on a test set on unseen data. 2 Theoretic Preliminaries We first explain the idea of Bayesian reasoning and give “idea l MDL” as a noncom- putable but provably good approach to learning. Then, we wil l dilute the approach to obtain a feasible modification of it in the form of the real M DL. For another view- point of the relation between Bayesianism and MDL see [2]. In the later sections we apply MDL to learning best model granularity. 62.1 Bayesianism Bayesianism is an induction principle with a faultless deri vation, yet allows us to estimate the relative likelihood of different possible hypo theses—which is hard or impossible with the commonly used Pearson-Neyman testing. With the latter tests we accept or reject a zero hypothesis with a given confidence. If we reject the zero hypothesis, then this does not mean that we do accept the alte rnative hypothesis. We cannot even use the same data to test the alternative hypthes is. (Or a subhypothesis of the alternative hypothesis—because note that all hypoth eses different from the zero hypothesis must be taken together to form the alternati ve hypothesis.) In fact, this type of testing does not establish the relative likelih ood between competing hypotheses at all. Definition 1 Consider a discrete sample space Ω. Let D,H 1,H2,...be a countable set of events (subsets) of Ω. H={H1,H2,...}is called hypotheses space . The hypotheses Hiare exhaustive (at least one is true). From the definition of c onditional probability, that is, P(A|B) =P(A∩B)/P(B), it is easy to derive Bayes’s formula (rewrite P(A∩B) in two different ways): P(Hi|D) =P(D|Hi)P(Hi) P(D). (1) If the hypotheses are mutually exclusive ( Hi∩Hj=∅for all i,j), then P(D) =/summationdisplay iP(D|Hi)P(Hi). Despite the fact that Bayes’s rule is just a rewriting of the d efinition of conditional probability, its interpretation and applications are most profound and have caused bitter controversy over the past two centuries. In Equation 1, the Hi’s represent the possible alternative hypotheses concerning the phenom enon we wish to discover. The term Drepresents the empirically or otherwise known data concern ing this phenomenon. The term P(D), the probability of data D, may be considered as a normalizing factor so that/summationtext iP(Hi|D) = 1. The term P(Hi) is called the a priori probability or initial probability of hypothesis Hi, that is, it is the probability of Hibeing true before we see any data. The term P(Hi|D) is called a posteriori or inferred probability In model selection we want to select the hypothesis (model) with the maximum a posteriori probability (MAP).1 The most interesting term is the prior probability P(Hi). In the context of machine learning, P(Hi) is often considered as the learner’s initial degree of belief in hypothesis Hi. In essence Bayes’s rule is a mapping froma priori probability P(Hi) 1If we want to predict then we determine the expected a posteriori probability by i ntegrating over hypotheses rather than choosing one hypothesis which m aximises the posterior. 7toa posteriori probability P(Hi|D) determined by data D. In general, the problem is not so much that in the limit the inferred hypothesis would not concentrate on the true hypothesis, but that the inferred probability give s as much information as possible about the possible hypotheses from only a limite d number of data. In fact, the continuous acrimonious debate between the Bayesi an and non-Bayesian opinions centered on the prior probability. The controvers y is caused by the fact that Bayesian theory does not say how to initially derive the prior probabilities for the hypotheses. Rather, Bayes’s rule only tells how they are to beupdated . In the real world problems, the prior proabilities may be unknown, uncomputable, or even conceivably non-existent. (What is the prior probability o f use of a word in written English? There are many different sources of different social backgrounds living in different ages.) This problem would be solved if we can find a single probability distribution to use as the prior distribution in each differe nt case, with approximately the same result as if we had used the real distribution. Surpr isingly, this turns out to be possible up to some mild restrictions. 2.2 Kolmogorov Complexity So as not to divert from the main thrust of the paper, we recapi tulate the basic formal definitions and notations in Appendixes A, B. Here we g ive an informal overview. Universal description length: For us, descriptions are finite binary strings. Since we want to be able determine where a description ends, w e require that the set of descriptions is a prefix code : no description is a proper initial segment (proper prefix) of another description. Intuitively, the prefix Kolmogorov complexity of a finite object xconditional yis the length K(x|y) in bits of the shortest effective description of xusing yas input. Thus, for every fixed ythe set of such shortest effective descriptions is required to be a prefix code. We defin eK(x) =K(x|ǫ) where ǫmeans “zero input”. Shortest effective descriptions are “eff ective” in the sense that we can compute the described objects from them. Unfortu nately, [9], there is no general method to compute the length of a shortest descr iption (the prefix Kolmogorov complexity) from the object being described. Th is obviously impedes actual use. Instead, one needs to consider computable appro ximations to shortest descriptions, for example by restricting the allowable app roximation time. This course is followed in one sense or another in the practical in carnations such as MDL. There one often uses simply the Shannon-Fano code [4, 12], wh ich assigns prefix code length lx:=−logP(x) toxirrespective of the regularities in x. IfP(x) = 2−lx for every x∈ {0,1}n, then the code word length of an all-zero xequals the code word length of a truly irregular x. While the Shannon-Fano code gives an expected code word length close to the entropy, it does not distinguis h the regular elements of a probability ensemble from the random ones, by compressi ng individual regular objects more than the irregular ones. The prefix code consist ing of shortest prefix- 8free programs with the prefix Kolmogorov complexities as the code word length set does both: for every computable distribution PtheP-expected code-word length (prefix Kolmogorov complexity) is close to the entropy of Pas well as that every individual element is compressed as much as is possible usin g an effective code. Universal probability distribution: Just as the Kolmogorov complexity mea- sures the shortest effective description length of an object , thealgorithmic universal probability m(x|y) ofxconditional ymeasures the greatest effective probability of xconditional y. It turns out that we can set m(x|y) = 2−K(x|y), (2) in the Ap- pendix B. For precise definitions of the notion of “greatest e ffective probability” the reader is referred to this appendix as wel. It expresses a property of the prob- ability of every individual x, rather than entropy which measures an “average” or “expectation” over the entire ensemble of elements but does not tell what happens to the individual elements.2We will use the algorithmic universal probability as a universal prior in Bayes’s rule to analyze ideal MDL. Individual randomness: The common meaning of a “random object” is an outcome of a random source. Such outcomes have expected prop erties but particular outcomes may or may not possess these expected properties. I n contrast, we use the notion of randomness of individual objects . This elusive notion’s long history goes back to the initial attempts by von Mises, [15], to formu late the principles of application of the calculus of probabilities to real-world phenomena. Classical prob- ability theory cannot even express the notion of “randomnes s of individual objects.” Following almost half a century of unsuccessful attempts, t he theory of Kolmogorov complexity, [9], and Martin-L¨ of tests for randomness, [14 ], finally succeeded in for- mally expressing the novel notion of individual randomness in a correct manner, see [12]. Every individually random object possesses individu ally all effectively testable properties that are only expected for outcomes of the random source concerned. It is “typical” or “in general position” in that it will satis fyalleffective tests for randomness— known and unknown alike. A major result states t hat an object xis individually random with respect to a conditional probabil ity distribution P(·|y) iff log(m(x|y)/P(x|y)) is close to zero. In particular this means that xis “typical” or “in general position” with respect to conditional distribu tionP(·|y) iff the real prob- ability P(x|y) is close to the algorithmic universal probability m(x|y) = 2−K(x|y). That is, the prefix Kolmogorov complexity K(x|y) is close to the Shannon-Fano code length of xas element of the a set with probability distribution P(·|y). For example, if His the hypothesis that we deal with a fair coin and the data sample Dis a hundred outcomes ‘heads’ in a row, then Disn’t typical for H. But ifDis a truly random individual sequence with respect to H(a notion that has a precise formal and quantitative meaning), then Dis typical for H. The probability of atypical sequences is very small and goes to zero when the d ata sample grows unboundedly. 2As an aside, for every fixed conditional ythe entropy −/summationtext xm(x|y)logm(x|y) =∞. 9Prediction and Model Selection: It has been shown by Solomonoff [22] that the continuous variant of mhas astonishing performance in predicting sequences where the probability of the next element is computable from the initial segment. We now come to the punch line: Bayes’s rule using the algorith mic universal prior distribution, suggested by Solomonoff already in [21], yiel ds Occam’s Razor principle and is rigorously shown to work correctly in the companion pa per [27]. Namely, it is shown that this implies that data compression is almost al ways the best strategy, both in hypothesis identification and prediction. 2.3 Minimum Description Length Principle Scientists formulate their theories in two steps. Firstly, a scientist, based on sci- entific observations, formulates alternative hypotheses ( there can be an infinity of alternatives), and secondly a definite hypothesis is select ed. The second step is the subject of inference in statistics. Historically this was d one by many different prin- ciples, like Fisher’s Maximum Likelihood principle, vario us ways of using Bayesian formula (with different prior distributions). Among the mos t dominant ones is the ‘common sense’ idea of applying Occam’s razor principle of c hoosing the simplest consistent theory. But what is “simple”? We equate “simplic ity” with “shortness of binary description,” thus reducing the razor to objective d ata compression. However, no single principle is both theoretically sound an d practically satisfiable in all situations. Fisher’s principle ignores the prior pro bability distribution (of hypotheses). To apply Bayes’s rule is difficult because we usu ally do not know the actual prior probability distribution. (What is the prior d istribution of words in written English, where there are many sources of many ages an d social classes?) No single principle turned out to be satisfiable in all situat ions. Philosophically speaking, relative shortness achievable by ultimate data c ompression presents an ideal way of solving induction problems. However, due to the non-computability of the Kolmogorov complexity and the associated algorithmic u niversal prior function, such a theory cannot be directly used. Some approximation is needed in the real world applications. Rissanen [17] follows Solomonoff’s idea, but substitutes a ‘ good’ computable approximation to m(x) to obtain the so-called Minimum Description Length principle. Rissanen not only gives the principle, more impo rtantly he also gives the detailed formulas on how to use this principle. This made it p ossible to use the MDL principle. The basic form of the MDL principle can be intu itively stated as follows: Minimum Description Length Principle. The best theory to explain a set of data is the one which minimizes the sum of •the length, in bits, of the description of the theory; •the length, in bits, of data when encoded with the help of the t heory. 10A survey of the development of the MDL principle in statistic al inference and its applications is given in [1]. In [27] the relationship betwe en the Bayesian approach and the minimum description length approach is established . The general modeling principle MDL is sharpened and clarified, abstracted as the i deal MDL principle and defined from Bayes’s rule by means of Kolmogorov complexity. The argument runs as follows: Given a data sample and a family of models (hypotheses) one wa nts to select the model that produced the data. A priori it is possible that the data is atypical for the model that actually produced it. Meaningful induction is po ssible only by ignoring this possibility. Strictly speaking, selection of a “true” model is improper usage, “modeling the data” irrespective of truth and falsehood of t he resulting model is more appropriate. In fact, given data sample and model class the truth about the models is impossible to ascertain and modeling as well as pos sible is all we can hope for. Thus, one wants to select a model for which the data is typ ical. The best models make the two-part description of the data using the model as c oncise as possible. The simplest one is best in accordance with Occam’s razor princi ple since it summarizes the relevant properties of the data as concisely as possible . In probabilistic data or data subject to noise this involves separating regularit ies (structure) in the data from random effects. From Bayes’s Formula 1, we must choose the hypothesis Hthat maximizes the posterior P(H|D). Taking the negative logarithm on both sides of Equation 1: −logP(H|D) =−logP(D|H)−logP(H) + log P(D). Here, log P(D) is a constant and can be ignored because we just want to optim ize the left-hand side of the equation over H. Maximizing the P(H|D)’s over all possible H’s is equivalent to minimizing −logP(H|D), that is, minimizing −logP(D|H)−logP(H). To obtain the ideal MDL principle it suffices to replace the ter ms in the sum by K(D|H) and K(H), respectively. In view of (2) in the Appendix B this is justi fied provided −logP(D|H)+=−logm(D|H) and also −logP(H)+=−logm(H). In [27] we show that the basic condition under which this substi tution is justified is encapsulated as the Fundamental Inequality, which in broad terms states that the substitution is valid when the data are random, relative to e very contemplated hypothesis and also these hypotheses are random relative to the (universal) prior. Basically, the ideal MDL principle states that the prior pro bability associated with the model should be given by the algorithmic universal proba bility, and the sum of the log universal probability of the model plus the log of the probability of the data given the model should be minimized. For technical reasons t he latter probability P(D|H) must be computable. 11It is important to note that using the algorithmic universal prior we compress every model Hto its prefix Kolmogorov complexity K(H) =−logm(H). Applying the ideal MDL principle then compresses de description of th e data encoded using the model, D|H, to its prefix Kolmogorov complexity K(D|H) =−logm(D|H) as well for the model Hminimizing the sum of the two complexities. Roughly speakin g, the MDL selection assumes that the data set is “typical” for t he selected model H. Thus, MDL aims at selecting a model for which the data are “typ ical”, even if there happened to be a different “true” model that inappropriately generated “atypical” data. In this manner application of MDL is resilient to overfi tting the model. 2.4 Ideal MDL versus Real MDL Using the algorithmic universal prior, the ideal MDL princi ple is valid for a set of data samples of Lebesgue measure one, the “random”, “typi cal” outcomes, for every contemplated hypothesis. For these “typical” outcom es we have K(D|H)+= −logP(D|H) which means that the classic Shannon-Fano code length reac hes the prefix Kolmogorov complexity on these data samples. The Shan non-Fano code that assigns code words of length+=−logP(·) to elements randomly drawn according to a probability density P(·) is in fact used in the applied statistical version of MDL. Thus, under the assumption that the data sample is typical fo r the contemplated hypotheses, the ideal MDL principle and the applied statist ical one coincide, and moreover, both are valid for a set of data samples of Lebesgue measure one [27]. The latter result has been obtained in the statistical theory us ing probabilistic arguments [1]. The term −logP(D|H), also known as the self-information in information theory and the negative log likelihood in statistics, can now be reg arded as the number of bits it takes to redescribe or encode Dwith an ideal code relative to H. In different applications, the hypothesis Hcan mean many different things, such as decision trees, finite automata, Boolean formulas, or a polynomial. Example 1 In general statistical applications, one assumes that His some model H(θ) with a set of parameters θ={θ1,... ,θ k}of precision c, where the number k may vary and influence the descriptional complexity of H(θ). For example, if we want to determine the distribution of the length of beans, th enHis a normal distri- bution N(µ,σ) with parameters median µand variation σ. So essentially we have to determine the correct hypothesis described by identifyi ng the type of distribution (normal) and the correct parameter vector ( µ,σ). In such cases, we minimize −logP(D|θ)−logP(θ). Example 2 Let’s consider the fitting of a ‘best’ polynomial on ngiven sample points in the 2-dimensional plane. This question is notorio usly underdefined, since 12both a 1st degree polynomial with χ2best fit, and a ( n−1)th degree polynomial with perfect fit are arguably the right solutions. But with th e MDL principle we can find an objective ‘best’ polynomial among the polynomial s of all degrees. For each fixed k,k= 0,... ,n −1, let fkbe the best polynomial of degree k, fitted on points ( xi,yi) (1≤i≤n), which minimizes the error error(fk) =n/summationdisplay i=1(fk(xi)−yi)2. Assume each coefficient takes cbits. So fkis encoded in c(k+ 1) bits. Let us interpret the yi’s as measurements for argument xiof some true polynomial to be determined. Assume that the measurement process involves e rrors. Such errors are accounted for by the commonly used Gaussian (normal) distri bution of the error on yi’s. Thus, given that fis the true polynomial, Pr(y1,... ,y n|f,x1,... ,x n) =/productdisplay exp(−O((f(xi)−yi)2)). The negative logarithm of above is c′·error(f) for some computable c′. The MDL principle tells us to choose f=fm, with m∈ {0,... ,n −1}, which minimizes c(m+ 1) + c′·error(fm). In the original Solomonoff approach a hypothesis His a Turing machine. In gen- eral we must avoid such a too general approach in order to keep things computable. In different applications, Hcan mean many different things. For example, if we infer decision trees, then His a decision tree. In case of learning Boolean formulas, thenHmay be a Boolean formula. If we are fitting a polynomial curve t o a set of data, then Hmay be a polynomial of some degree. In Experiment 1 below, Hwill be the model for a particular character. Each such Hcan be encoded by a binary string from a prefix-free set, where a set of codes is prefix-fr ee if no code in the set is a prefix of another. 3 Experiment 1: On-Line Handwritten Characters 3.1 Model Development 3.1.1 Basic Assumptions When an alphanumeral character is drawn on a planar surface, it can be viewed as a composite planar curve, the shape of which is completely determined by the coordinates of the sequence of points along the curve. The or der of the sequence is determined by on-line processing the data from the scanning machinery at the time of writing the character. Since the shape tends to vary from p erson to person and from time to time, so do the coordinates of the point sequence . A key assumption 13in our treatment is that for a particular person writing cons istently the shape of the curve tends to converge to an average shape, in the sense t hat the means of corresponding coordinates of the sampled point sequences c onverge. That is, we assume: •Each shape of an example curve for a particular character con tains a set dis- tinguished feature points. •For each such point, the average of the instances in the differ ent examples converges to a mean. •Moreover, there is a fixedprobability distribution (possibly unknown) for each such point which is symmetric about the mean value, and the va riance is assumed to be the same for all the character drawings. Essentially, we only assume that one person’s hand-writing has a fixedassociated probability distribution, which does not change. 3.1.2 Feature Space, Feature Extraction and Prototypes A Kurta ISONE digitizer tablet with 200/inch resolution in b oth horizontal and vertical directions was used as the scanner to obtain and sen d the coordinates of the sequential points of the character curve on the tablet to the microprocessor of a IBM PS/2 model 30 computer. The system was implemented usin g programming language C. The coordinates were normalized on a 30 by 30 grid in horizontal and vertical directions. The character drawn on the tablet is processed on-line. The s equence of the coordinates in order of time of entry is stored in the form of a linked list. This list is preprocessed in order to remove the repeating points due to h esitation at the time of writing, and to fill in the gaps between sampled points resu lted from the sampling rate limit of the tablet. The latter needs some explanation: the digitizer has a maxim um sampling rate of 100 points/second. If a person writes a character in 0.2 se conds, only 20 points on the character curve will be sampled, leaving gaps between those points. The preprocessing procedure ensures that in the resulting l inked list any pair of consecutive points on the curve has at least one component of coordinates (stored as integers between 0 and 30) differing by 1 and no coordinate com ponent differing by more than 1. For a preprocessed list (( x1,y1),... ,(xn,yn)) therefore we have that for all i(1≤i < n) |xi−xi+1|+|yi−yi+1| ≥ 1 |xi−xi+1|,|yi−yi+1| ≤ 1 The preprocessed curve coordinate list is then sent to the fe ature extraction process. So far the coordinates are still integers in the range of 0 to 3 0. 14The coordinates of certain points along the character curve s are taken as relevant features . Feature extraction is done as follows. A character may cons ist of more than one stroke (a stroke is the trace from a pen drop-down to pen li ft-up), the starting and ending points of every stroke are mandatorily taken as fe atures. In between, feature points are taken at a fixed interval, say, one point fo r every npoints along the preprocessed curve, where nis called feature extraction interval . This is to ensure that the feature points are roughly equally spaced. A ctually the Euclidean length between any two points on the stroke curve, excluding the last point of a stroke, varies from nto√ 2n(for the diagonal). The sequence of the feature point coordinates extracted fro m a given character drawing constitute a feature vector . (If the character drawing contains more than one stroke, its feature vector consists of the concatenation of the feature vectors of the individual strokes in time-order.) The dimension of the fea ture vector is the number of entries in it—or rather twice that number since each entry has two coordinate components. Obviously the dimension of the feature vector i s also a random variable since the shape and the total number of points on the characte r curve varies from time to time. The dimension of the feature vector is largely d etermined by the feature extraction interval. The extracted feature vector of a character is viewed as a prototype of a character, and is stored in the knowledge base of the system as such. 3.1.3 Comparison between Feature Vectors Before the system is employed to recognize characters, it mu st first learn them. It is trained with examples of the character drawings from th e same data source which it is supposed to recognize afterwards. Here the ‘same data source’ means the same person writing consistently. The basic technique u sed in both training and recognition is the comparison or matching between prototyp es or feature vectors. To compare any two prototypes or feature vectors of equal dimen sion, we can simply take the Euclidean distance between the two vectors. Mathem atically this means subtracting each component of one vector from its correspon ding component in the other feature vector, summing up the square of the differe nces and taking the square root of the sum. If the two prototypes are χ= ((x1,y1)... ,(xn,yn)) and χ′= ((x′ 1,y′ 1)... ,(x′ n,y′ n)), then the distance between them is /radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbtn/summationdisplay i=1(xi−x′ i)2+ (yi−y′ i)2. The knowledge base of the system is a collection of feature ve ctors stored in the form of a linked list. Each such feature vector is an example of a pa rticular character and is called a prototype for that character. Each newly entered character drawing in the form of a feature vector is compared to the prototypes in t he knowledge base. 15But we do not (cannot) assume that all feature vectors extrac ted from examples of the same character will have the same dimension. Therefore, the comparison technique used in our system foll ows the spirit of this mathematical definition but is more elastic. As a consequenc e, corresponding feature points may be located in different places in the feature vecto rs. This problem is solved by so-called elastic matching which compares a newly sampled feature vector with the set of stored feature vectors, the prototypes . The elasticity is reflected in two aspects: Dimension tolerance is a constant integer Tdsuch that the new feature vector is compared with all stored feature vector of which the dimensi on is not more thanTddifferent. That is, if the new feature vector has nfeature points, it will be compared (matched) with all the prototypes with a num ber of feature points in the range of [ n−Td,n+Td]. Local extensibility is an integer constant Nesuch that the ith feature point of the new feature vector is compared with the feature points wi th index ranging fromi−Netoi+Neof each prototype satisfying the dimension tolerance. The least Euclidean distance found this way is considered to be t he ‘true’ difference dibetween the two vectors at ith feature point. Definition 2 If the dimension of the new feature vector xisn, then the elastic distance δ(x,x′) between xand a prototype x′is defined as δ(x,x′) =/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbtn/summationdisplay i=1d2 i ifx′is within the dimension tolerance Tdofx, and δ(x,x′) =∞otherwise. For our particular problem, experimental evidence indicat es that it suffices to set both TdandNeto 1. In our experiment we used elastic distance between a new feature vector xand a prototype x′as computed above with Td=Ne= 1. 3.1.4 Knowledge Base and Learning The knowledge base is constructed in the learning phase of th e system by sampling feature vectors of handwritten characters while telling th e system which character it is an example of. Our system uses the following Learning Algorithm to establish the knowledge base. Step 0. Initialize the knowledge base Sto the empty set ∅. (The elements of Swill be triples ( x,χ,c ) with xa preprocessed feature vector (a prototype), χis the character value of which xis a prototype, and cis a counter.) Assign values to weights α,β(used later to combine prototypes) so that α+β= 1. 16Step 1. Sample a new example of a character feature vector, say xafter prepro- cessing, together with its character value, say χ. (Actually, the user draws a new example handwritten character on the tablet and indicat es the character value—which character the drawing represents—to the syste m.) Step 2. Check Swhether or not any prototypes exist for character χ. If there is no prototype for χinS, then store xinSas a prototype for χby setting S:=S∪ {(x,χ,1)}. IfPx={y,... ,z }is a nonempty list of prototypes for χinS, then determine elastic distances δ(x,y)... δ(x,z). Let Pmin x⊆Pxbe the set of prototypes in Pxsuch that for all x′∈Pmin xwe have δ(x,x′) =δmindef= min {δ(x,y) :y∈Px}. Nowx′∈Pmin xmay or may not be one of the prototypes with the character value χ. Step 2.1. Ifx′∈Pmin xand (x′,χ,m)∈S(the minimum distance δminis between xand one of the prototypes for χinS), then x′:=αx′+βx;m:=m+ 1. (The new prototype is combined with the existing prototype b y taking the weighted average of every coordinate to produce a modified pr ototype for that character. Moreover, we add one to the counter associated wi th this prototype) Step 2.2. If Step 2.1 is not applicable, then for no x′∈Pmin xwe have (x′,χ,·)∈S(the minimum distance is between xand prototype(s) in Swith character value /ne}ationslash=χ). Then we distinguish two cases. Case 1. There is ( x′,χ,m)∈Ssuch that δ(x,x′)≤δmin(m+ 1)/m. (Here mis number of character drawings which have consecutively be combined to form the current x′prototype.) Then set x′:=αx′+βx;m:=m+ 1. It is expected that the modified prototype will have minimal d istance δmin next time when a similar drawing of the same character value a rrives. Case 2. The condition in Case 1 is not satisfied. Then the new prototyp e will be saved in the knowledge base as a new prototype for the chara cter by setting S:=S∪ {(x,χ,1)}. Notice that more than one prototype for a single character is allowed in the knowl- edge base. 173.1.5 Recognition of an Unknown Character Drawing The recognition algorithm is simple. Assume the Learning Al gorithm above has been executed, and a knowledge base Swith prototypes of all possible characters has been constructed. When an new character drawing is prese nted to the system, it is compared to all the prototypes in the knowledge base wit h dimension variation within the range specified by the dimension tolerance. The ch aracter of the prototype which has minimum δ-distance from the presented feature vector is considered t o be the character value of that feature vector. The rationale he re is that the prototypes are considered as the ‘mean’ values of the feature vectors of the characters, and the variances of the distribution are assumed to be the same for a ll prototypes. Formally, theRecognition Algorithm is as follows. Step 0. Sample a new example of a character feature vector, say xafter prepro- cessing. (Actually, the user draws a new example handwritte n character on the tablet which is preprocessed to form feature vector x.) Step 1. IfS={(x1,χ1,·),... ,(xn,χn,·)}is the knowledge base, then determine elastic distances δ(x,x1)... δ(x,xn). Ifδ(x,xi) is the minimal distance in this set, with iis least in case more than one prototype induces minimum dist ance, then set χiis the character value for xand Recognize character χi. This concludes the main procedure of training and classifica tion. A few remarks are in order to explain differences with the original elastic matching method. 1. This process differs from the original elastic matching me thod in the the way of prototype construction. More than one prototype are allo wed for a single character. By our procedure in the Learning Algorithm, a pro totype is the statistical mean of a number of positive examples of the character. 2. Every prototype is a feature vector which in turn is a point in the feature space of its dimension. Since the classification is based on statis tical inference, the rate of correct classification depends not only on how well th e prototypes in the knowledge base are constructed, but also on the variability of the handwrit- ing of the subject. Even though more than one prototype is all owed for any character in the knowledge base, too many prototypes may res ult in an overly dense feature space. When the δ-distance between two points (two prototypes in the knowledge base) in the feature space is comparable to t he variability of the subjects handwriting, then the rate of correct classi fication may drop considerably. 3. The prototypes in the knowledge base constitute the model for the system. How well the prototypes are constructed will essentially de termine the rate 18of correct classification and therefore the performance of t he model. For the scheme described above, the prototypes are constructed by e xtracting points at a constant interval. Generally speaking, more points in t he prototypes gives a more detailed image of the character drawing but may also in sert random ‘noise’ in the model. Application of MDL to guide the selection of ‘best’ feature e xtraction interval is the main thrust of this work, to which we proceed now. 3.2 Implemented Description Lengths and Minimization The expression in MDL consists of two terms: the model and err or coding lengths. The coding efficiency for both of these two terms must be compar able, otherwise minimizing the resulted expression of total description le ngth will give either too complicated or too simple models. For this particular probl em, the coding lengths are determined by practical programming considerations. A set of 186 character drawings, exactly 3 for each of the 62 al phanumeral char- acters, were processed to feature vectors and presented to t he Learning Algorithm, to form the raw database. The character drawings were stored in standardized in- teger coordinate system standardized from 0 to 30 in both xandyaxis. After preprocessing as above, they were then input to the Learning Algorithm to establish a knowledge base: the collection of prototypes with normali zed real coordinates, based on a selected feature extraction interval. Subsequent to the construction of the knowledge base, the sy stem was tested by having it classify the same set of character drawings using t he Recognition Algo- rithm. This procedure served to establish the error code len gth and the model code length which are defined as follows. Definition 3 Theerror code length orexception complexity is the sum of the total number of points for all the incorrectly classified characte r drawings. This represents the description of the data given the hypothesis. Themodel code length ormodel complexity is the total number of points in all the prototypes in the machine’s knowledge base multiplied b y 2. This represents the hypothesis. Thetotal code length is the sum of the error code length and the model code length. Remark 1 The factor of 2 in the model code length is due to the fact that t he prototype coordinates are stored as real numbers which take s twice as much mem- ory (in programming language C) as the character drawing coo rdinates which are represented in integer form. One might wonder why the protot ype coordinates are real instead of integer numbers. The reason is to facilitate the elastic matching to give small resolution for comparisons of classification. 19Figure 1: Experimentally Determined Error- and Model Code L engths Thus, both the model and error code lengths are directly rela ted to the feature extraction interval. The smaller this interval, the more co mplex the model, but the smaller the error code length. The effect is reversed if the fe ature extraction interval goes toward larger values. Since the total code length is the sum of the two code lengths, there should be a value of feature extraction inter val which minimizes the total code length. This feature extraction interval is considered to be the ‘be st’ one in the spirit of MDL. The corresponding model, the knowledge base, is cons idered to be optimal in the sense that it contains enough essence from the raw data but eliminates most redundancy due to noise from the raw data. This optimal featu re extraction interval can be experimentally determined by carrying out the above d escribed build-and- test (building the knowledge base and then test it based on th e same set of characters on which it was built) for a number of different feature extrac tion intervals. The actual optimization process was implemented on the actu al system we con- structed, and available to the user. For our particular set o f characters and trial, the results of classifying by the Recognition Algorithm the same set of 186 char- acter drawings used by the Learning Algorithm to establish t he knowledge base, is given in Figure 1. Three quantities are depicted: the model c ode length, the error code length, and the total code length, versus different feat ure extraction intervals (FEATURE EXTRACTION INTERVAL in the figure). For larger feat ure extrac- tion intervals, the model complexity is small but most of the character drawings are misclassified, giving the very large error code length and he nce the very large total 20Figure 2: Fraction Correctly Classified Training Data code length. On the other hand, when the feature extraction i nterval is at its low extremal value, all training characters get correctly clas sified which gives zero error coding length. But now the model complexity reaches its larg est value, resulting also in a large total code length again. The minimum total cod e length occurred in our experiment at an extraction interval of 8, which gives 98 .2 percent correct clas- sification. Figure 2 illustrates the fraction of correctly c lassified character drawings for the training data. 3.3 Validation of the Model Whether the ‘optimal’ model, determined by choosing the int erval yielding minimal total code length for the training data, really performs bet ter than models in the same class using different feature extraction intervals, ca n be tested by classification of new data—new character drawings. We have executed such a test by having the set of 62 characters drawn anew by the same person who provided the raw data base to build the k nowledge base. After preprocessing, the feature vectors resulting from th ese data were entered in the Recognition Algorithm. The new data are considered to be from the same source as the previous data set. This new data set was classified by the system using the knowle dge bases built by the Learning Algorithm from the training data set of 186 char acter drawings, based on different feature extraction intervals. The test results are plotted in Figure 3 in terms of the fraction of correct classification (CORRECT RAT IO) versus feature 21Figure 3: Fraction Correctly Classified New Test Data extraction interval (FEATURE EXTRACTION INTERVAL) It is in teresting to see that a 100% correct classification occurred at feature extra ction intervals 5, 6 and 7. These values of feature extraction intervals are close to th e optimal value 8 resulting from MDL considerations. Furthermore, at the lower feature extraction intervals, the correct classification rate drops, indicating the distu rbance caused by too much redundance in the model. The recommended working feature ex traction interval is thus either 7 or 8 for this particular type of character drawi ngs. 4 Experiment 2: Modeling a Robot Arm In the second experment, the problem is to model a two-jointe d robot arm described in the introduction. A mathematical description is as follo ws. Let r1andr2be the lengths of the two limbs constituting the arm. One end of the l imb of length r1is located in the joint at the origin (0 ,0) of the two-dimensional plane in which the arm moves. The angle the limb makes with the horizontal axis i sθ1. The angle the limb of length r2, the second limb, makes with the first limb (in the second join t) isθ2. Then the relationship between the coordinates ( y1,y2) of the free end of the second limb (the hand so to speak) and the variables θ1,θ2is given by y1=r1cos(θ1) +r2cos(θ1+θ2) y2=r1sin(θ1) +r2sin(θ1+θ2). 22The goal is to construct a feedforward neural network that co rrectly associates the (y1,y2) coordinates to the ( θ1,θ2) coordinates. As in [13] we set r1= 2 and r2= 1.3. The setup is similar to the character recognition experiment except that the data are not real-wo rld but computer gener- ated. We generated random examples of the relation between y1,y2andθ1,θ2as in the above formula and gaussian noise of magnitude 0.05 was ad ded to the outputs. Since we want the learned model to extrapolate from the train ing examples rather than interpolate between them, the training sets consist of random examples taken from two limited and separate areas of the domain. In the trai ning data the first angle θ1was in between 90 and 150 degrees or between 180 and 240 degree s, and the second angle was in between 30 and 150 degrees. To test extrap olation capabality of the learned model we used a unseen test set in which θ1ranges between 0 and 270 and θ2between 0 and 180 degrees. 4.1 Model Features The model class consists of three-layer feedforward networ ks. The first layer is the input layer consisting of two input nodes with as input the re al values of the two angles θ1,θ2. Both nodes in the input layer are connected with every node i n the second layer—the hidden layer—of which the number of nodes i s to be determined. Every node in the second layer is connected to both nodes in th e third (output) layer, yielding the two real-valued output values y1,y2. There are no other connections between pairs of nodes. The second layer nodes have sigmoidi al transfer functions and in the third layer output nodes have linear transfer func tions. Thus, the only unknowns in the network are the number of nodes in the hidden l ayer, the weights on the connections and the biases of the nodes in the hidden la yer. For every number ofknodes ( k= 2,3,... ,15) in the hidden layer we learned the weights and biases of the network using standard methods by repeatingly presen ting the training set. After that, the learned models are evaluated expermentally as to their prediction errors on the unseen test set. During the experiments we noticed that if we used a test set fr om the same domain as the training set—thus testing interpolation rath er than extrapolation— then the increase of error with increasing number of nodes in the hidden layer (after the optimal number) was small. For the unseen test set descri bed earlier—testing extrapolation or generalization—the increase of the error after the optimal network size was more steep. Below we used the latter “generalizatio n” test set. 4.2 Determining Size of Hidden Layer by MDL We verify the contention that in this experimental setting t he hypothesis selected by the MDL principle using the training data set can be expect ed to be a good predictor for the classification of unseen data from a test se t. 23Neural networks can be coded in the following way. Both the to pology, the biases of the nodes, and the weights on the links are coded. Assume th at the network contains knodes. The code starts with the number k. Next a list of kbias values is encoded using lbits for each bias value. We need k×(k−1) bits to describe which pairs of nodes are connected by directed arcs (possibly in tw o ways). The weight for each link is given using a precision of lbits. Concatenating all these descriptions in a binary string we can only retrieve the network if we can parse the constituent parts. Keeping the above order of the constituents we can do that if w e know k. Therefore, we start the encoding with a prefix-free code for kin log k+ 2log log kbits.3The total description now takes at most log k+ 2log log k+k×l+k(k−1) +m×lbits, where mis the number of directed edges (links). For three-layer feedforward networks that constitute our m odels, with two input nodes and two output nodes and knodes in the hidden layer, the topology is fixed. As already stated, we have to choose only the weights on the li nks and the biases of the hidden nodes. This gives descriptions of length log k+ 2log log k+ 5k×lbits. For the range of k,lwe consider the logarithmic terms can be ignored. Thus, the model cost is set at 5 klbits, and with precision l= 16 the model cost is linear in k at 80kbits. The encoding of the output data for the neural network, to det ermine the error cost in the MDL setting, depends on whether they are given as i ntegers or reals. For integers one takes the 16 bits that the MaxInt format require s, and for real numbers usually twice as many, that is, 32 bits. For reals such an enco ding introduces a new problem: when is the output correct? We consider it correct i f the real distance between the output vector and the target vector is under a sma ll fixed real value. In the MDL code every example consists of two reals which are e ncoded as 64 bits. Thus, the erroroneous examples, those exceeding the small fi xed error cut-off level that we set, are encoded in 64 bits each. We ignore the amount w ith which the misclassified output real value differs from the target real v alue, it may be large or small. The total error is encoded as an explicit list of the mi sclassified examples. Because MDL selects the model that minimizes sum of model len gth and total error length, it is important how large a training set we choo se. The coding length of the models is the same for every fixed kand training set size, but the total error length depends on this. For a small training set the num ber of erroneous (misclassified) examples may be very small compared to the mo del code length, and the difference between simple models with small kand complex models is large. With large training sets the opposite happens. This is exact ly right: with a small number of examples the simpler models are encouraged. How co mplex a model can be must be justified by the size of the training set. Intuit ively, with increasing training set size, eventually the smallest model that has lo w error on this set can be expected to stabilize and to have low prediction error. 3This is standard in prefix-free coding, see Appendix A. 24In the following experiment we used a random training set of 1 00 examples, and for every k(2≤k≤15) a network with knodes in the hidden layer was trained with 106training cycles. Figure 4 shows the results in terms of MDL: t he model code length, the error code length, and the total descriptio n length, as a function of the number of nodes in the hidden layer. The optmimum of the to tal code length is reached for seven hidden nodes, that is, MDL predicts that se ven hidden nodes (the granularity of the hidden layer so to speak) give the best mod el. This is only one node away from the optimal network size determined experime ntally below. 0500100015002000250030003500 23456789101112131415Coding length in bits Number of hidden nodes"MDL codelength" "Model code" "Error code" Figure 4: Prediction by MDL. 4.3 Validation of the Model To determine the best number of hidden nodes we used thirty di fferent random training sets of 100 examples each. For every k(2≤k≤15) the network was trained using 106training cycles. Other more sophisticated stop criteria co uld have been used, but some checking showed that in general the performan ce of the network after 106training cycles was close to optimal. The error per example i s the real distance between the output vector and the target vector. In figure 5 th e average squared error on the training set and the average squared prediction error on the unseen test set are displayed as a function of the number of nodes in t he hidden layer. The optimal network in the sense of having best extrapolatio n and generalization properties in modeling the unseen examples in the test set mo st correctly, is a network with 8 hidden nodes. As expected, the error on the training set keeps on decreasin g with an increasing number of nodes in the hidden layer, that is, when the model be comes increasingly complex and is capable of modeling more and more detail. When we look at the prediction error of new examples that were not in the trainin g data (figure 5), we see 2511.522.533.54 23456789101112131415Average squared error Number of hidden nodes"Generalization error" 00.10.20.30.40.50.6 23456789101112131415Average squared error Number of hidden nodes"Training error" Figure 5: Error on the training set and the test set that the average squared prediction error first decreases wh en the model complexity increases, but that there is an optimum of minimum error afte r which the error starts to increase again. Experimentally, the best number of hidde n nodes for this problem with a training set size of 100 examples is 8, that is, one more than predicted by the simplified application of MDL above. 5 Discussion We applied the theoretical Minimum Description Length prin ciple to two different experimental tasks aimed at learning the best model discret ization. The first appli- cation was learning to recognize isolated handwritten char acters on-line using elastic matching and some statistical technique. A ‘model’ is a coll ection of prototypes built from raw training character drawings by on-line taking poin ts on the curves of the executed character drawing at a constant feature extractio n interval, and by com- bining closely related character drawings. Some novel feat ures here are the use of multiple prototypes per character, and the use of the MDL pri nciple to choose the optimal feature extraction interval. The model is optimized in the spirit of MDL by minimizing the t otal code length, which is the sum of the model and error-to-model code lengths , against different feature extraction intervals. The resulting model is optim al according to the theory. It is then validated by testing using a different set of charac ter drawings from the same source. We believe that the result of this small test giv es evidence that MDL may be a good tool in the area of handwritten character recogn ition. The second application was modeling a robot arm by a three lay er feedforward neural network, where the precision parameter to be learned is the number of nodes in the hidden layer. The MDL predicted number of nodes was val idated by extensive testing of the model with respect to extrapolation and gener alization capabilities using unseen examples from a test set. The optimal granularity of the models was predicted for sens ible values–only marginally different from the experimentally determined op timal ones. This shows that this rigorous and not ad hoc form of “Occam’s Razor” is qu ite succesfull. 26Comparison of the performance of the—admittedly limited— e xperiments on the robot arm problem with that of other principles, such as NIC a nd AIC, indicated that MDL’s performance was better or competitive [3]. A similar theory and practice validation in case of the Bayes ian framework for model comparison was given by Mackay [13]. This paper inspir ed us to use the robot arm problem in the MDL setting. We note that the Bayesian fram ework is genuinely different as is rigorously demonstrated in our companion pap er [27]. It is well known that prefix code length is equivalent to negative log probabi lity through the Shannon- Fano code [4, 12], and therefore with every such code there co rresponds an equivalent probability. Thus, the MDL coding approach can in principle be translated back into a Bayesian approach where the model code gives the prior . The analysis we have given in [27] shows that the data-to-model error may not correspond the the conditional data-to-model probability if the data are “aty pical” for the contemplated prior. Moreover, to the authors coding of large data is more n atural than reasoning about possibly nonexisting probabilities. 5.1 Directions for Future Work In general the MDL method appears to be well suited for superv ised learning of best model discretization parameters for classification proble ms in which error coding is straightforward. Applying the MDL method is simple, and it i s computationally not expensive. The central point is that using MDL the optimal granularity o f the model param- eters can be computed automatically rather than tuned manua lly. This approach constitutes a rational and feasibly computable approach fo r feature selection as op- posed to customary rather ad hoc approaches. The purpose of p resenting the theory outline and the example applications is to stimulate re-use in different areas of pat- tern recognition, classification, and image understanding (region segmentation, color clustering segmentation, and so on). Acknowledgement We are grateful to Les Valiant for many discussions on machin e learning and the suggestion for this research, to Guido te Brake and Joost Kok for executing the robot arm experiment, and to the referees for their insightf ul comments. A Appendix: Kolmogorov Complexity The Kolmogorov complexity [9] of a finite object xis the length of the shortest effective binary description of x. We give a brief outline of definitions and properties. For more details see [12]. Let x,y,z ∈ N, where Ndenotes the natural numbers 27and we identify Nand{0,1}∗according to the correspondence (0,ǫ),(1,0),(2,1),(3,00),(4,01), .. . Hereǫdenotes the empty word ‘’ with no letters. The length l(x) ofxis the number of bits in the binary string x. For example, l(010) = 3 and l(ǫ) = 0. The emphasis is on binary sequences only for convenience; ob servations in any alphabet can be so encoded in a way that is ‘theory neutral’. A binary string xis aproper prefix of a binary string yif we can write x=yzfor z/ne}ationslash=ǫ. A set {x,y,... } ⊆ {0,1}∗isprefix-free if for any pair of distinct elements in the set neither is a proper prefix of the other. A prefix-free se t is also called a prefix code. Each binary string x=x1x2... x nhas a special type of prefix code, called a self-delimiting code , ¯x=x1x1x2x2... x n¬xn, where ¬xn= 0 if xn= 1 and ¬xn= 1 otherwise. This code is self-delimiting because we can determine where the code word ¯ xends by reading it from left to right without backing up. Using this code we define the standard self-delim iting code for xto be x′=l(x)x. It is easy to check that l(¯x) = 2nandl(x′) =n+ 2log n. We develop the theory using Turing machines, but we can as wel l use the set of LISP programs or the set of FORTRAN programs. LetT1,T2,...be a standard enumeration of all Turing machines, and let φ1,φ2,... be the enumeration of corresponding functions which are com puted by the respec- tive Turing machines. That is, Ticomputes φi. These functions are the partial recursive functions or computable functions. The Kolmogorov complexity C(x) ofx is the length of the shortest binary program from which xis computed. Formally, we define this as follows. Definition 4 TheKolmogorov complexity ofxgiven y(for free on a special input tape) is C(x|y) = min p,i{l(i′p) :φi(p,y) =x,p∈ {0,1}∗,i∈ N}. Define C(x) =C(x|ǫ). Though defined in terms of a particular machine model, the Kol mogorov com- plexity is machine-independent up to an additive constant a nd acquires an asymp- totically universal and absolute character through Church ’s thesis, from the ability of universal machines to simulate one another and execute an y effective process. The Kolmogorov complexity of an object can be viewed as an abs olute and objec- tive quantification of the amount of information in it. This l eads to a theory of absolute information contents ofindividual objects in contrast to classic information theory which deals with average information to communicate objects produced by a random source [12]. 28For technical reasons we also need a variant of complexity, s o-called prefix kol- mogorov complexity, which is associated with Turing machin es for which the set of programs resulting in a halting computation is prefix free . We can realize this by equiping the Turing machine with a one-way input tape, a se parate work tape, and a one-way output tape. Such Turing machines are called pr efix machines since the halting programs for anyone of them form a prefix free set. Taking the uni- versal prefix machine Uwe can define the prefix complexity analogously with the plain Kolmogorov complexity. If x∗is the first shortest program for xthen the set {x∗:U(x∗) =x,x∈ {0,1}∗}is aprefix code . That is, each x∗is a code word for some x, and if x∗andy∗are code words for xandywithx/ne}ationslash=ythenx∗is not a prefix of x. Let/an}bracketle{t·/an}bracketri}htbe a standard invertible effective one-one encoding from N ×N to prefix- free recursive subset of N. For example, we can set /an}bracketle{tx,y/an}bracketri}ht=x′y′. We insist on prefix-freeness and recursiveness because we want a univers al Turing machine to be able to read an image under /an}bracketle{t·/an}bracketri}htfrom left to right and determine where it ends. Definition 5 Theprefix Kolmogorov complexity ofxgiven y(for free) is K(x|y) = min p,i{l(/an}bracketle{tp,i/an}bracketri}ht) :φi(/an}bracketle{tp,y/an}bracketri}ht) =x,p∈ {0,1}∗,i∈ N}. Define K(x) =K(x|ǫ). The nice thing about K(x) is that we can interpret 2−K(x)as a probability distribution since K(x) is the length of a shortest prefix-free program for x. By the fundamental Kraft’s inequality, see for example [4, 12], we know that if l1,l2,...are the code-word lengths of a prefix code, then/summationtext x2−lx≤1. This leads to the notion of algorithmic universal distribution—a rigorous form of O ccam’s razor–below. B Appendix: Universal Distribution A Turing machine Tcomputes a function on the natural numbers. However, we can also consider the computation of real valued functions. For this purpose we consider both the argument of φand the value of φas a pair of natural numbers according to the standard pairing function /an}bracketle{t·/an}bracketri}ht. We define a function from Nto the realsRby a Turing machine Tcomputing a function φas follows. Interprete the computation φ(/an}bracketle{tx,t/an}bracketri}ht) =/an}bracketle{tp,q/an}bracketri}htto mean that the quotient p/qis the rational valued tth approxmation of f(x). Definition 6 A function f:N → R isenumerable if there is a Turing machine Tcomputing a total function φsuch that φ(x,t+ 1)≥φ(x,t)andlimt→∞φ(x,t) = f(x). This means that fcan be computably approximated from below. If fcan also be computably approximated from above then we call frecursive . 29A function P:N → [0,1] is a probability distribution if/summationtext x∈NP(x)≤1. (The inequality is a technical convenience. We can consider the s urplus probability to be concentrated on the undefined element u/ne}ationslash∈ N). Consider the family EPofenumerable probability distributions on the sample space N(equivalently, {0,1}∗). It is known, [12], that EPcontains an element m that multiplicatively dominates all elements of EP. That is, for each P∈ EP there is a constant csuch that cm(x)> P(x) for all x∈ N. We call manalgorithmic universal distribution or shortly universal distribution . The family EPcontains all distributions with computable parameters whi ch have a name, or in which we could conceivably be interested, o r which have ever been considered. The dominating property means that massigns at least as much probability to each object as any other distribution in the f amily EPdoes. In this sense it is a universal a priori by accounting for maximal ignorance. It turns out that if the true a priori distribution in Bayes’s rule is recursive, then using the single distribution m, or its continuous analogue the measure Mon the sample space {0,1}∞(for prediction as in [22]) is provably as good as using the tr uea priori distribution. We also know, [12], that we can choose −logm(x) =K(x) (2) That means that massigns high probability to simple objects and low probabil ity to complex or random objects. For example, for x= 00...0 (n0’s) we have K(x)+= K(n)+<logn+ 2log log nsince the program print ntimes a ‘‘0’’ prints x. (The additional 2log log nterm is the penalty term for a self-delimiting encoding.) Then, 1 /(nlog2n) =O(m(x)). But if we flip a coin to obtain a string y ofnbits, then with overwhelming probability K(y)+> n(because ydoes not contain effective regularities which allow compression), and hence m(y) =O(1/2n). The algorithmic universal distribution has many astonishi ng properties [12]. One of these, of interest to the AI community, is that it gives a ri gorous meaning to Occam’s Razor by assigning high probability to the “simple, ” “regular,” objects and low probability to the “complex,” “irregular”, ones. Fo r a popular account see [8]. A celebrated result states that an object xis individually random with respect to a conditional probability distribution P(·|y) iff log( m(x|y)/P(x|y))+= 0. Here the implied constant in the+= notation is in fact related to K(P(·|y))—the length of the shortest program that computes the probability P(x|y) on input x. In particular this means that for xis “typical” or “in general position” with respect to condit ional distribution P(·|y) iff the real probability P(x|y) is close to the algorithmic universal probability m(x|y) = 2−K(x|y). 30References [1] A.R. Barron, J. Rissanen, and B. Yu, The minimum descript ion length principle in coding and modelling, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory , IT-44:6(1998), 2743– 2760. [2] C. Bishop, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , Oxford University Press, 1995. [3] G. te Brake, J.N. Kok, and P.M.B. Vit´ anyi, Model selecti on for neural networks: Comparing MDL and NIC, In: Proc. European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks , Brussels, April 20-22, 1994. [4] T.M. Cover and J.A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory , Wiley, New York, 1991. [5] Q. Gao and M. Li. An application of minimum description le ngth principle to online recognition of handprinted alphanumerals. In 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 843–848. Morgan Kaufmann Pub- lishers, 1989. [6] H. Jeffreys. Theory of Probability . Oxford at the Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1961. Third Edition. [7] M.J. Kearns, U. Vazirani, An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory , MIT Press, 1994. [8] W.W. Kirchherr, M. Li and P.M.B. Vit´ anyi, The miraculou s universal distri- bution, Mathematical Intelligencer , 19:4(1997), 7–15. [9] A.N. Kolmogorov. Three approaches to the quantitative d efinition of informa- tion.Problems Inform. Transmission , 1(1):1–7, 1965. [10] J. Kurtzberg. Feature analysis for symbol recognition by elastic matching. IBM J. Res. Develop. , 31(1):91–95, 1987. [11] M. Li and P.M.B. Vit´ anyi. Inductive reasoning and Kolm ogorov complexity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. , 44:343–384, 1992. [12] M. Li and P.M.B. Vit´ anyi. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications , Springer-Verlag, New York, 2nd Edition, 1997. [13] D.J.C. MacKay. A practical bayesian framework for back propagation networks. Neural Computation , 4(3):448–472, 1992. [14] P. Martin-L¨ of, The definition of random sequences, Inform. Contr. , 9(1966), 602-619. 31[15] R. von Mises, Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrech nung, Mathemat. Zeitsch. , 5(1919), 52-99. [16] J. Quinlan and R. Rivest. Inferring decision trees usin g the minimum description length principle. Inform. Computation , 80:227–248, 1989. [17] J. Rissanen. Modeling by the shortest data description .Automatica-J.IFAC , 14:465–471, 1978. [18] J. Rissanen. Universal coding, information, predicti on and estimation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , IT-30:629–636, 1984. [19] J. Rissanen. Minimum description length principle. In S. Kotz and N.L. John- son, editors, Encyclopaedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. V , pages 523–527. Wiley, New York, 1986. [20] J. Rissanen. Stochastic complexity. J. Royal Stat. Soc., series B , 49:223–239, 1987. Discussion: pages 252-265. [21] R.J. Solomonoff, A formal theory of inductive inference , Part 1 and Part 2, Inform. Contr. , 7(1964), 1-22, 224-254. [22] R.J. Solomonoff. Complexity-based induction systems: comparisons and con- vergence theorems. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory , IT-24:422–432, 1978. [23] C.Y. Suen. Automatic recognition of handprinted chara cters—the state of art. Proc. IEEE , 68(4):469–487, 1980. [24] C.C. Tapper. Cursive script recognition by elastic mat ching. IBM J. Res. Develop. , 26(6):765–771, 1982. [25] L.G. Valiant. Deductive learning. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. , A 312:441–446, 1984. [26] L.G. Valiant. A theory of the learnable. Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach , 27:1134– 1142, 1984. [27] P.M.B. Vit´ anyi and M. Li, Minimum Description Length I nduction, Bayesian- ism, and Kolmogorov Complexity, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory , IT-46:2(2000), 446–464. 32

arXiv:physics/0005063v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 23 May 2000Scaling properties of an inviscid mean-motion fluid model B.T. Nadiga Earth and Environmental Sciences, MS-B296, Los Alamos Nati onal Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 An inviscid two-dimensional fluid model with nonlinear disp ersion that arises simultaneously in coarse-grained descriptions of the dynamics of the Euler eq uation and in the description of non- Newtonian fluids of second grade is considered. The scaling o f the equilibrium states of this model for conserved energy and enstrophy retains the correspondi ng scaling for the Euler equations on the large scales and at the same time greatly deemphasizes the im portance of small scales. This is the firstcleardemonstration of the beneficial effect of nonlinear dispersi on in the model, and should highlight its utility as a subgrid model in more realistic si tuations. I. INTRODUCTION In 1998, Holm et al.,1using the Euler-Poincar´ e varia- tional formalism, proposed a model for the mean motion of ideal incompressible fluids. In this approach, the (re- duced) Lagrangian, which for the incompressible case is the kinetic energy, was modified from that for the Euler equation: l=1 2/integraldisplay |u|2dx(=E), to account for fluctuation energy of the velocity field in conjunction with the introduction of a fluctuation length scaleα:2 l=1 2/integraldisplay/parenleftbig |u|2+α2|∇u|2/parenrightbig dx(=Eα). (1) The resulting “ α-model” for the Euler equations is ∂v ∂t+u· ∇v−α2(∇u)T· ∇2u=−∇p ∇ ·u= 0,v=/parenleftbig 1−α2∇2/parenrightbig u (2) where, when αis set to zero, v=u, and the usual Euler equations are recovered. All other notation is standard. These equations are envisaged as modeling the flow of inviscid incompressible fluids at length scales larger than α. (For proof of existence and uniqueness of solutions of (2), see Shkoller3and Cioranescu & Girault4(viscous case).) Rivlin and Ericksen,5in 1955, derived general consti- tutive laws of the differential type for an incompressible fluid, wherein at the first order, viscous Newtonian stress results (first grade fluids), while at the next order invis- cid, non-Newtonian, stress-strain relations appear (sec- ond grade fluids). Equations (2) are identically the equa- tions governing inviscid second-grade fluids, and where nowαis a material property. Viscous and inviscid sec- ond grade fluid flows have since been studied from differ- ent viewpoints (e.g., see Dunn & Fosdick6and references therein, and Cioranescu & Girault4). We also note that the variational formulation of (2) was already explicitly noted in Cioranescu & Ouazar.7 The new derivation of (2) has, however, renewed in- terest in them and besides spurring more mathematicalwork has stimulated computational investigations of α- models(e.g., 8–10)for the reason that the advection ve- locity, u, is obtained by a spatial-average of the advected fieldv(inversion of the Helmholtz operator in (2)). This results in a modification of the advective nonlinearity, the main nonlinearity of fluid dynamics, in such a way as to suppress mutual interactions between scales which are smaller than α(as can be seen, for example, in the untruncated version of (5) below when |m|,|n|>2π/α). This modification is purely inviscid, and we will refer to it simply as nonlinear-dispersion in what follows. How- ever, with the exception of Nadiga & Shkoller,10compu- tational studies of α-models have always used additional viscous terms: For example, Chen et al.8(1998) examine the applicability of a viscous α-model to model turbu- lent channel flow, and Chen et al.9(1999) explore the utility of a three-dimensional viscous α-model in provid- ing a subgrid model for fluid turbulence. While this is clearly the appropriate direction to pursue in the context of realistic applications, we think that studying purely inviscidα-models, although idealized, is important and will complement the study of their viscous counterparts. In Nadiga and Shkoller,10among other things, we pre- sented a series of two-dimensional numerical computa- tions comparing the solutions of Euler equations, Navier- Stokes equations, and an Euler- αmodel, and showed that the Euler-αmodel was able to reproduce the typical en- strophy decay characteristics of the Navier-Stokes equa- tions, but in a conservative setting. Presently, we address some statistical scaling aspects of the dynamics of such an Euler-αmodel to highlight its inviscid subgrid-scale modeling features. To better illustrate the effects of nonlinear-dispersion , the salient feature of all α-models, it suffices to consider (2) in two-dimensions. In that case, it can be rewritten in the vorticity-streamfunction formulation as dq dt=∂q ∂t+J[ψ,q] = 0 q=/parenleftbig 1−α2∇2/parenrightbig ω,∇2ψ=ω, (3) whereψis the streamfunction, ωis the vorticity, Jis the Jacobian operator so that J[ψ,q] =−∂ψ ∂y∂q ∂x+∂ψ ∂x∂q ∂y, and again, when αis set to zero, q=ω, and the usual Euler 1equations result. Equation (3) can be also be written as ∂ω ∂t+/parenleftbig 1−α2∇2/parenrightbig−1J[ψ,/parenleftbig 1−α2∇2/parenrightbig ω] = 0,∇2ψ=ω, a form that highlights the modification to the J[ψ,ω] nonlinear term of the Euler equations. Parenthetically, we note that in going to two-dimensions, we lose analogs of three-dimensional processes like vorticity stretching , and therefore, fail to characterize the effect of nonlinear- dispersion on such processes. The kinetic energy Eα(denoted by Ewhenα= 0), as defined in (1), is an obvious constant of motion in both two and three dimensions. However, in two dimensions, unlike in three, the vorticity q(ωwhenα= 0) of each fluid element is an inviscid constant (see (3)), implying an infinity of conservation laws. In particular, enstrophy Zα, defined as Zα=1 2/integraldisplay/bracketleftbig/parenleftbig 1−α2∇2/parenrightbig ω/bracketrightbig2dx, (4) is a second conserved quadratic quantity. As before, whenα= 0, we represent the conserved enstrophy by Z. (The domain integral of u·ωor helicity is a quadratic quantity which is conserved in three dimensions, but which is identically zero in two dimensions.) The use of equilibrium statistical mechanical theo- ries (for (3) with α= 0) to better understand the inviscid dynamics of two-dimensional flows range from the two-constraint theory (see Kraichnan and Mont- gomery11and references therein) for finite truncations of the continuous system, to those based on point vortices (again see Kraichnan and Montgomery11and references therein) and their generalizations to continuous vorticit y fields12,13which consider the infinity of conserved quanti- ties. In this article, we present the two-constraint theory for (3) and verify the main results of the theory compu- tationally. Other than mentioning that there is already some numerical evidence10which seems to suggest that individual solutions of the Euler- αmodel (3) may indeed follow predictions made for the behavior of the ensemble- averaged solutions of the Euler equations by the more complicated statistical theories we do not consider such theories any more in this short note. Also, since one may be tempted to point to the shortcomings of the two- constraint theory for the Euler equations before consid- ering the utility of such a theory for the Euler- αmodel, we wish to point out that the importance of this work lies primarily in the comparison of the results for the Euler- α model to the classical results for the Euler equations. In so doing, the effects of nonlinear-dispersion , and its bene- ficial numerical ramifications, are clearly highlighted. At the risk of belaboring the point further, we reemphasize that in considering the simple two constraint theory, we are in no way suggesting that the behavior of the ensem- ble averaged solution of the α-model (3) (or their slightly viscous counterparts) will follow this theory in more real- istic situations; the limitation of this theory in predicti nglarge-scale coherent structures in the α= 0 case is well known,11and carry over to the nonzero αcase. Furthermore, from a numerical point of view, invis- cid computations of (3) which conserve two quadratic invariants are fairly easily realizable and more common- place than the more involved multisimplectic schemes which are required for conserving a larger number of constraints. Also, while state of the art schemes of the latter kind can handle only tens of modes (because of anN3logNscaling of computational work, where, N is the number of modes14), there is no such restriction on schemes of the former kind. Examples of schemes which conserve just the energy and enstrophy invariants are Fourier-Galerkin truncations implemented as a fully dealiased pseudospectral spatial discreteization and the second-order finite difference spatial discreteization us- ing the Arakawa Jacobian. While we have done compu- tations with both these schemes and see no discrepancy between the results, we consider only the spectral dis- cretization in this article since the theory presents itsel f most naturally in this setting. II. TWO-CONSTRAINT STATISTICAL THEORY FOR (3) Letqxrepresent a discretization of qon a two- dimensional spatial grid, x, with 2N+1 equispaced points on each side. Let /hatwideqk, where kis the set of all wave- vectorsk= (kx,ky) denote the Fourier transform of qx. Although there are (2 N+ 1)2k-space grid points, sinceqxis real, not all of them are independent and /hatwideqk=/hatwideq∗ −k. Therefore, there are only half as many k-space grid points, and, kthe set of all kis such that k≡ {k= (kx,ky), kmin≤kx,ky≤kmax}. However, since each /hatwideqkis a complex number, there are overall (2N+ 1)2degrees of freedom in /hatwideqk. Consider the truncation of (3) that is closed in /hatwideqk: d dt/hatwideqk+/summationdisplay m+n=k k,m,n ∈k/hatwideqm/hatwideqnm×n |m|2(1 +α2|m|2)= 0.(5) Among the infinity of conservations for the continuous system (3) previously discussed, conservations (1) and (4) are the only ones which survive for the truncated system (5), and may be expressed in terms of /hatwideqkas Eα=1 2/summationdisplay k∈k|/hatwideqk|2 |k|2(1 +α2|k|2), Zα=1 2/summationdisplay k∈k|/hatwideqk|2.(6) This follows from the detailed conservation property of energy and enstrophy wherein each of these quantities is conserved in every triad interaction. Considering the dynamics of /hatwideqkunder (5), we work in the (2N+ 1)2dimensional phase space. As a conse- quence of (3) satisfying a detailed Liouville theorem (see 2Kraichnan and Montgomery11and references therein), (5) also satisfies a Liouville theorem and the motion of /hatwideqkin the truncated phase space is divergence free.11We can, therefore, define a stationary probability density, P, such thatP/producttext k∈kd/hatwideqkis the probability of finding the system within the ((2 N+ 1)2dimensional) phase space volume/producttext k∈kd/hatwideqkcentered around /hatwideqk, and the ensemble average of any quantity O, a function of /hatwideqk, as /an}b∇acketle{tO/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/integraldisplay OP/productdisplay k∈kd/hatwideqk. (7) Next, a maximization of the information theoretic en- tropys, defined in the usual fashion as s=−/an}b∇acketle{tlnP−1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=−/integraldisplay (PlnP−P)/productdisplay k∈kd/hatwideqk, subject to constant ensemble-averaged energy and en- strophy, /an}b∇acketle{tEα/an}b∇acket∇i}htand/an}b∇acketle{tZα/an}b∇acket∇i}htrespectively, leads to P=aexp(−βEα−γZα). (8) Here,β(an inverse temperature associated with energy) andγ(an inverse temperature associated with enstro- phy) are the Lagrange multipliers associated with the two constraints, and ais determined from /integraldisplay P/productdisplay k∈kd/hatwideqk= 1. Making use of (6) in (8) then leads to a factorization of the probability density: P=a/productdisplay k∈kexp/parenleftbigg −|/hatwideqk|2/parenleftbiggβ |k|2(1 +α2|k|2)+γ/parenrightbigg/parenrightbigg .(9) The ensemble averaged two-dimensional spectral den- sity is then computed using (7) and (9) (after noting the expressions for the moments of a Gaussian) as /an}b∇acketle{tUα(k)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht ≡1 2/an}b∇acketle{t|/hatwideqk|2 |k|2(1 +α2|k|2)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=1 41 β+γ|k|2(1 +α2|k|2). Since (the isotropic) one-dimensional spectra are more convenient for plotting, we define Eα(|k|) =/summationdisplay |k|≤|j|<|k|+1/an}b∇acketle{tUα(j)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht,so thatEα=/summationdisplay |k|Eα(|k|). In what follows, we drop the | · |sign onkand to avoid confusion, note that while Eαrepresents the total con- served energy, Eα(k), with a dependence on k, represents the corresponding one-dimensional spectrum. The one- dimensional spectrum Eα(k) is then seen to scale with k as Eα(k)∼k β+γk2(1 +α2k2), (10)with the above scaling being only approximate when the mode spacing is not small compared to k(as at small k). In (10), since αis a given length scale, once the dis- cretization is fixed, expressions for the total energy and enstrophy of the given initial conditions provide two equations to solve for βandγ. The equilibrium spectral scaling (10) is then seen to exhibit three regimes depend- ing on the values of the conserved energy and enstrophy as follows. If the minimum and maximum wavenumbers of the truncation are kminandkmaxrespectively, and if we define a mean wavenumber15of the initial conditions as, k1=/radicalbigg Zα Eα, then, we can identify three regimes depending on the signs ofβandγ: •If the initial conditions are such that the mean wavenumber k1is small:kmin≤k1<ka, then the temperature corresponding to energy is negative, while that corresponding to enstrophy is positive: −γk2 min(1 +α2k2 min)<β < 0,γ >0; •If the mean wavenumber k1is medium: ka<k1< kb, then both temperatures are positive: β >0, γ >0; •If the mean wavenumber k1is large:kb< k1≤ kmax, then the temperature corresponding to en- ergy is positive while the temperature correspond- ing to enstrophy is negative: β > 0,−β < γk2 max(1 +α2k2 max)<0. Here,ka, andkbare constants depending on the filter lengthαand the discretization: k2 a=k2 max−k2 min 2/bracketleftbigg log/parenleftbiggkmax(1 +α2k2 min) kmin(1 +α2k2max)/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg−1 , k2 b=k2 max+k2 min 2+α2k4 max+k2 maxk2 min+k4 min 3. (In the case of an infinite domain, the first of the above cases,β <0, cannot occur since ka= 0.) Further, we can also compute the spectrum of the en- ergy conserved by the Euler equation ( E) under the dy- namics of the Euler- αmodel. Noting that E=1 2/summationdisplay k∈k|/hatwideqk|2 |k|2(1 +α2|k|2)2, (an extra factor (1+ α2|k|2) in the denominator compared to the expression for Eα) and that Eis not conserved forα/ne}ationslash= 0, the scaling of its one-dimensional spectrum, denoted simply by E(k), may be written as16 E(k)∼k (1 +α2k2)(β+γk2(1 +α2k2)). (11) 3III. DISCUSSION AND COMPUTATIONAL VERIFICATION OF RESULTS We devote the remainder of the article to a discussion of the scalings (10) and (11) and their computational verification. First, when αis set to zero in either (10) or (11), the classic result of Kraichnan11for the Euler equation: E(k)∼k β+γk2(12) is recovered, with the three regions corresponding to the different combination of signs for βandγnow separated by values of the mean wavenumber k1corresponding to kaandkb, wherekaandkbare given by k2 a=k2 max−k2 min 2/bracketleftbigg log/parenleftbiggkmax kmin/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg−1 , k2 b=k2 max+k2 min 2. As has been noted many times now11forα= 0, there is no discontinuity of any sort in going from one region to the other among the three regions corresponding to different combinations of signs of βandγ. Therefore, for convenience, we first consider, in detail, the case β >0 andγ >0, and define kα ∗=1 α√ 2/parenleftBigg −1 +/radicalBigg 4α2β γ+ 1/parenrightBigg1 2 , k∗= lim α→0kα ∗=/radicalBigg β γ, and note that kα ∗=k∗/parenleftbig 1 +O(α2k2 ∗)/parenrightbig . Furthermore, k∗can be shown17to be of the order of k1. (Thus, for simplicity in what follows, one may use k1, kα 1,k∗, andkα ∗interchangably, or represent all of them byk1.) For the Euler solutions, we have from (10) with α= 0, the large scales and small scales (with respect to k∗) behaving asymptotically as E(k)∼k, kmin≤k≪k∗; E(k)∼k−1, k∗≪k≤kmax, (13) implying equipartition of Eat large scales and equipar- tition ofZat small scales. (When k≪k∗,γk2≪βin (12) and when k≫k∗,γk2≫βin (12).) When αis not zero, however, from (10), one easily sees the analogous Eα- andZα-equipartition results to be respectively Eα(k)∼k, kmin≤k≪kα ∗; Eα(k)∼k−3, kα ∗≪k≤kmax. (14) This implies that nonlinear-dispersion in (3) acts in such a way as to preserve the Euler scaling of dynamicsat the large scales while at the same time greatly deemphasizing the importance of small scales . Asymptotic scalings arising from (11), for the noncon- served energy for α/ne}ationslash= 0: E(k)∼k, kmin≤k≪kα ∗; E(k)∼k−5, kα ∗≪k≤kmax. (15) further reinforce this result. Finally, we note that for α= 0, it is well known11(and easy to see from (10)) that whenkmax→ ∞, energy diverges logarithmically and enstrophy diverges quadratically. However, when α/ne}ationslash= 0, one can see from (10) that when kmax→ ∞, energy is not divergent and that the enstrophy Zαis quadratically di- vergent. Nevertheless, in Nadiga and Shkoller,10we show that it is the dynamics of the non-conserved enstrophies 1 2/integraltext ω2dxand1 2/integraltext/bracketleftBig/parenleftbig 1−α2∇2/parenrightbig1 2ω/bracketrightBig2 dxwhich are actu- ally interesting. While the former does not diverge, the latter diverges only weakly (logarithmically). We have carried out a series of computational exper- iments on a doubly periodic two-dimensional domain, wherein an ensemble of initial conditions were evolved under (5) for different values of αuntil statistical equili- bration was achieved. Initial conditions, similar to those in Fox and Orsag,18were obtained by choosing ampli- tudes for wavenumbers in the band 50 ≤ |k| ≤51 (zero elsewhere) from a zero-mean normal distribution of ran- dom numbers. The variance was scaled in such a way that for the different values of α, the conserved energy19 had the same value: Eα=E. The mean wavenumber k1 for this set of initial conditions corresponds to about 50.5 , and for the resolution chosen below, 28 .5≤ka≤43.5, andkb≥60.1. With this setup, besides letting both β andγbe positive, we can realize both the energy and enstrophy equipartition regimes in the same experiment. A fully dealiased pseudospectral spatial discretization was used with kmin= 1, andkmax=N= 85, and the nonlinear terms were computed in physical space us- ing 256 grid points in each direction. A nominally fifth- order, adaptive time stepping, Runge-Kutta Cash-Karp algorithm20was used for time integration. Energy was conserved to better than 1 in 105and enstrophy to better than 1 in 104over the entire duration of the runs. In Fig. 1, we plot the (instantaneous) spectrum Eα(k) againstk, on a log-log scale for four different values of α: 0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15, corresponding to between 0 to 2.4 percent of the domain size. The spectrum for the Euler case ( α= 0) is offset by a decade so as to not clutter the figure, and slopes of 1, −1, and −3 are drawn for reference. The scalings, (13) for α= 0, and (14) for nonzeroα, are clearly verified at both large and small scales, in Fig. 1, with in fact a cleaner (but identical) scaling of the large scales for nonzero α. Furthermore, the three spectra corresponding to the nonzero- αcases seem to collapse onto a single curve in Fig. 1. This col- lapse may be explained by noting that almost all the energy is contained in the low- kmodes (denoted below 4by the set of wavenumbers kE) and almost all enstrophy is contained in the high- kmodes (denoted below by the set of wavenumbers kZ). This leads to a leading order expression for βwhich is independent of α: β(α)∼/summationdisplay kEk/E, and one for γwhich is inversely proportional to α2: γ(α)∼/summationdisplay kZk/(α2k2 1Z). This in turn implies that the spectra (10) should be al- most independent of α, except for a small intermediate range ofk. 1 10 100 k10-810-710-610-5Eα (k)α=0 α=0.05-0.151 -3-1 FIG. 1. Plot of Eα(k) vs. kforα=0 (offset by a decade), andα= 0.05, 0.10, & 0 .15. Low- kscaling is identical for zero or nonzero α, but high- kscaling is much steeper for α/negationslash= 0. The theoretical asymptotic slopes are drawn for reference. The above collapse of the nonzero- αspectra onto a sin- gle curve seems to suggest that the actual value of αis not very important as long as its value is in a certain range. This, however, is not true as can be seen from the structure of the E(k) spectrum plotted in Fig. 2 for the same four cases. The theoretical scaling for this spec- trum is given in (11) and the asymptotic scalings are given in (15). Although the small scale behavior is as expected, it is clear that with increasing α, the struc- ture of the large scales is being substantially modified. (Scaling (15) at large scales, can obviously be realized by increasing the number of modes, but that is not our intent here; we are examining the effect of αat fixed resolution.) Therefore, a small value of αis indicated. In such a case, the nonlinear-dispersion of theα-model is highly beneficial at small-scales while the large-scale distortion is minimal. Considering that the minimally resolved length scale in these computations corresponds to about 0.074, one may conclude that αshould be ofthat order. That is to say, besides their use in describ- ing second-grade fluids, α-models in general and (3) in particular should be useful as a subgrid model in under- resolved computations. 1 10 100 k10-910-810-710-6Eα0 (k)α=0 0.05 0.10 0.151 -5-1 FIG. 2. Plot of E(k) vs. kforα= 0, 0 .05, 0.10, & 0 .15. Spectrum falls off much faster ( k−5) for α/negationslash= 0 compared tok−1forα= 0, but the large-scales are also increasingly changed with increasing α. These conclusions are also borne out in numerical ex- periments corresponding to the fluid-dynamically more interesting case wherein the temperature associated with energy is negative ( β <0). As mentioned earlier, such a case is obtained when the initial conditions are chosen with energy and enstrophy such that k1< ka. (As be- fore, 28.5≤ka≤43.5 for the different values of αfor the discretization chosen.) In such a case, there is a con- densation of energy on to the low modes of the system11 resulting in large scale structures (necessarily coherent ). However, the enstrophy equipartition scaling of the spec- tra discussed previously are unchanged. This gives us an opportunity to better test the extent of distortion of the low wavenumber (coherent) modes due to increasing α. While various aspects of the negative temperature case for nonzero αare considered in Nadiga and Shkoller,10in the spirit of this article, we presently consider only the spectral distortion to the structure of the low wavenum- ber (coherent) modes. In Fig. 3, where we plot the spec- trumE(k) versuskagain forα= 0, 0.05, 0.10, & 0.15, and now where k1≈2. For this case, only one realization (for each value of α) is considered and the spectrum cor- responds to a long time average, for good measure, taken after the system has reached statistical equilibrium. For this suite of runs, energy was conserved to machine preci- sion while enstrophy was conserved to about 0.3% for the entire duration of the runs considered. The steep slope of−5, for the small scales, for nonzero α(compared to a slope of −1 forα= 0) is again verified and more impor- tantly, for the case of α= 0.05, the low-mode structure (up tok= 10) is almost identical to the case of α= 0. 5This is clearly not the case for the two other values of the filter length, α, which are greater than the smallest resolved scale of the computation. 1 10 100 k10-1010-810-610-410-2100102E(k)α=0 0.05 0.10 0.15-1 -5 FIG. 3. Negative temperature case. Plot of E(k) vs.kfor α= 0, 0 .05, 0.10, & 0 .15. Small-scale spectrum falls off much faster ( k−5) forα/negationslash= 0 compared to k−1forα= 0. While the large scale distortion is minimal for α=0.05, it is appreciable for the other two cases with larger α. I would like to thank Len Margolin, Steve Shkoller, and John Dukowicz for many interesting discussions. This work was supported by the Climate Change Prediction Program of DOE at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. [1]D.D. Holm, J.E. Marsden, and T.S. Ratiu ,Euler- Poincar´ e models of ideal fluids with nonlinear dispersion , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4273–4277 (1998). [2] The integrand in (1) is slightly modified for domains with boundaries. [3]S. Shkoller ,Geometry and curvature of diffeomorphism groups with H1metric and mean hydrodynamics , J. Func. Anal.160, 337–365 (1998). [4]D. Cioranescu and V. Girault ,Solutions variation- nelles et classiques d’une famille de fluides de grade deux , Comptes Rendues de l’Acad. Sci. de Paris Serie 1 322, 1163– 1168 (1996). [5]R.S. Rivlin and J.L. Ericksen ,Stress-deformation rela- tions for isotropic materials , J. Rat. Mech. Anal. 4, 323–425 (1955). [6]J.E. Dunn and R.L. Fosdick ,Thermodynamics, stabil- ity and boundedness of fluids of complexity 2and fluids of second grade , Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 56, 191–252 (1974). [7]D. Cioranescu and E.H. Ouazar ,Existence et unicit’e pour les fluides de second grade , Comptes Rendues de l’Acad. Sci. de Paris Serie 1 298, 285–287 (1984). [8]S. Chen, C. Foias, D.D. Holm, E. Olson, E. S. Titi,and S. Wynne ,The Camassa-Holm equations as a closure model for turbulent channel flow , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5338– 5341 (1998). [9]S. Chen, D.D. Holm, L. Margolin, and R. Zhang ,Di- rect numerical simulations of the Navier-Stokes alpha mode l, preprint (1999). [10]B.T. Nadiga and S. Shkoller ,Mean motion, second- grade fluids, and the vortex-blob method , preprint (1999). [11]R.H. Kraichnan and D. Montgomery ,Two- dimensional turbulence , Rep. Prog. Phys. 43, 547–619 (1980). [12]R. Robert and J. Sommeria ,Statistical equilibrium states for two-dimensional flows , J. Fluid Mech. 229, 291– 310 (1991). [13]J. Miller, P.B. Weichman, and M.C. Cross , Statistical-mechanics, Euler equation, and Jupiter red sp ot, Phys. Rev. A 45, 2328–2359 (1992). [14]S. Shkoller , personal communication. [15] We can define kα 1=/radicalbigZα Eα, and k1=/radicalbigZ E. Then kα 1= k1/parenleftbig 1 +O(α2k2 1)/parenrightbig . Since the exact value of k1is not crucial, to keep things simple, we use k1forkα 1also. [16] Similarly also, the one-dimensional spectrum of1 2/summationtext k∈k|/hatwideqk|2 |k|2(again not conserved for α/negationslash= 0) scales ask(1+α2k2) β+γk2(1+α2k2). [17]C. Basdevant and R. Sadourny ,Ergodic properties of inviscid truncated models of two-dimensional incompressi ble flows, J. Fluid Mech. 69, 673–688 (1975). [18]D.G. Fox and S.A. Orszag ,Inviscid dynamics of two- dimensional turbulence , Phys. Fluids 16, 169–171 (1973). [19] This results in the scaling of the conserved enstrophy Zα withαasZα≈Z(1 +α2k2 1). [20]W.H. Press, B.P. Flannery, S.A.Teukolsky, and W.T. Vetterling ,Chapter 16 , Numerical Recipes in For- tran 77, Cambridge University Press, 708–716 (1992). 6

1 TRAJECTORIES OF LIGHT Scientists have tried to elucidate the nature of light since the beginning of times. Newton, in the seventeenth century, asserted that light was formed by very tiny corpuscles. Later on, Huygens stated that ligh t was a wave, basing this affirmation on its undulatory characteristics; however a wave has no significance without a medium that could transmit. It was then when the concept of ether was invented, but Michelson and Morley`s experiments showed that ether d oes not exist. Simultaneously, they also demonstrated a more transcendental fact: The invariableness of the translational speed of light. At the beginning of this century, Planck and Einstein did not approve the undulatory theory of light; rather supportin g the corpuscle theory, calling them photons, each formed by one particle, traveling in a straight line when being gauged against dimensions larger than its wavelength. Nevertheless, when observing very small objects whose dimensions are in the same order of magnitude as the wavelength, then it appears as if light turns around; so its trajectory is curved and since it fits mathematically to sine equations, it has been believed that light trajectory is sinusoidal. However, in some way Newton found out that r ed light particles are larger than blue ones, being both corpuscles. He gave heed to the fact that when two light beams cross one another, practically no collisions occur. Only when beams travel in slightly convergent trajectories such as when experimentin g interference of one and two slots, light interferes whit itself, canceling the beam if phase differential is 180 degrees, and doubling intensity if differential is 0 degrees or 360 degrees. Electromagnetic radiations are not limited to visible light. Rat her, the total spectrum from long - wave radio frequencies to cosmic rays is constituted by photons. Its behavior does not fit with the present theory, which considers photons as only one particle. Could somebody explain why photons have a spin equal to one, when most of subatomic particles have spins of + - 1/2? This sole fact suggests two particles rather than one. Or, as Hawking suggests, when particles have spins equal to one, a gyration of 360ª should be produced, so its position is the same than initial one. A particle moving in a sinusoidal trajectory does not exist in nature, neither at microscopic nor at macroscopic scale. It goes against the most elementary laws of physics, especially against inertia. Other common fallacy of our days, is to define li ght color by its wave length, because it is not constant, since it depends on its velocity, which in turn depends on the media in which it moves, such as air, vacuum, water, crystal, etc. If the equation stating that velocity is the product of wavelength b y frequency, when velocity decreases, which other variable changes, frequency or wavelength? Everything seems to show that frequency remains constant while wavelength decreases in size, while color does not change when passing to a denser medium. Therefore , color depends only on frequency. But how a photon, being a single particle, can "remember" its color? Or in other words, how a single particle can be frequency coded? 2 The present photon model cannot explain the different polarization, or how a photon mov es in a lineal or elliptical polarization. If a photon was a single particle, how can it be explained that its total charge is zero, while it produces an electric and magnetic field? The lack of coincidence of the present theory with the electromagnetic ra diation performance has led me to the search of a theory that fits in with the duality particle -wave. The fact that photons follow the sinusoidal equations, suggest by itself that we are dealing with a single harmonic motion being its projection in a plane sinusoidal curve. Single harmonic motion is characteristic of pendulums, springs, etc. and more universally of circular trajectories. It is characteristic of stars and atoms. PROPOSED PHOTON MODEL Consider, in dynamic equilibrium, a photon formed by two particles whose electric charges are opposed, and for this reason they attract each other. This attraction is equilibrated by the centrifugal force generated when rotating one with the other. (See figure 1). By rotating electrical charged particles, a perp endicular magnetic field is generated, also perpendicular to a stationary observer. Charge khcq h = Planck Constant (.sec10626.634joules ) c = Light velocity in vacuum (sm810998.2 ) k = Coulomb constant (22 910897.8 CNm ) 3 Following are definitions of the considered photon: DISTANCE BETWEEN PARTICLES : It is exactly the wavelength divided by (3.1416): d TANGENTIAL VELOCITY : Coincides tangential velocity with the translational velocity, and in vacuum equals: C = (sm810998.2 ) PARTICLE MASS : It is relativistic; in other words, depends on its frequency. Individual particle mass is equally spread. Otherwise, an unbalanced pattern in thei r trajectory will be obtained: Individual particle mass: 2 21 2Chfm PARTICLE CHARGE : It is calculated equaling centrifugal force to the electrostatic attraction force as follows: 22 2 4 2 rqkrmC hence krmcq2 22 Since 2Chfm khfrq22 But fC and r2 Hence rfc2 therefore 2cfr Then khCq2 therefore khCq 4 A constant value is obtained, by substituting the values: 98 34 10987.81459.310998.21026.6  q Coulombs q1810653.2 This charge if 16.558 times an electron charge. SYSTEM ENERGY : It is the sum of translationa l kinetic energy plus rotational kinetic energy and is expressed: Total energy: kinetic rotacional kineticnal translatio totalE EE kr ktEEE (1) 222 2 21 21mcmc Ekt (2) 222 2 21 21II Ekr (3) The moment of inertia for a particle body is: 2mrI (4) By substituting equation (4) into (3): 222mrEkr And since the particle tangential velocity equals c, then: 2 22c r hence 22mcEkr By substituting in (1): 222 2mcmcE Which yields the well -known equation: 5 2mcE This equation could not be obtained if the photon was a single particle. PATH: It is variable, depending on polarization; if polarization is linear, the gyration plane coincides with the translational displacement, forming cycloidal trajectories. When the translational movement is perpendicular to the rotation plane, then the trajectory is in spiral, called circular polarization. Any intermediate position will produce an elliptical polarization. (Fig.2). Plane polarization Circular polarization TESTING PROPOSED MODEL To test out if the above -described model fits the general performance, not only top visible light but to all electromagnetic spectrum, an experiment was conducted in the Electromagnetic Radiation Laboratory of the Engineering Faculty of the UNAM. Instruments employed were a Marconi oscillator (based on a Gunn diode), with 8 milliwatts power output, oscillating at 9,000 Mhz modulated with a 1 Khz square wave vertically polarized by means of a 1/4 wavelength antenna, reflected by a parabolic disk. The wave produ ced was slightly intercepted by the edge of an aluminum screen, mounted on a ruler to measure horizontal displacements. 6 At the end of the wave' s path, a receiving 1/4 wavelength antenna was mounted, adapted also to a horn antenna so as to minimize reflec tion and the consequent formation of standing waves. To the receiving antenna, a germanium detector was connected, and from this, to the vertical input of an oscilloscope to measure the intensity received by the receiving antenna. When the aluminum plate w as displaced horizontally, a decrease in the radiation received was observed periodically, every 1.67 centimeters (this length is equivalent to 1/2 wavelength). Also the intensity received was exactly 1/2 of the amplitude of the square wave. If the wave path were sinusoidal, the minima peaks (vales) would be observed every full wavelength, and not every 1/2 wavelength. This is in agreement with the proposed hypothesis. However, the analysis of the model based on its performance would be: A two-particle phot on model has a total electrical charge of zero but forms an electrical field in the gyration plane, and a perpendicular magnetic field. This model explains why it is no possible to have a photon standing still since it is a system in dynamic equilibrium, b y stopping it, this equilibrium is broken and the photon system is broken and the system is destroyed. If all the degrees of freedom of two particles, rotational and translational moving system, all the polarization forms are exactly obtained, this is: Lin ear, circular and elliptical. Particle mass depends on its frequency, and hence, it can be stated that it has a relativistic mass in direct proportion with its frequency. However, when standing still, its mass does not equals zero. It is a mass so small th at cannot be measured with present day instruments. However, it is of the same order of magnitude (standing still) of the neutrino and the antineutrino mass. 7 Second experiment For this experiment, a simple L -C resonant oscillator, coupled to a resonant cavity which frequency was adjusted to 10.5 Ghz without modulation. An horizontal movement system with a metallic plate was installed in the path of the microwave beam, making measu res every millimeter, obtaining the following results: 8 2Transmitter Parabolic antenna Metalic plateHorn antenna Field-strength meter Displacement in Cm Field strength uA Displacement in Cm Field strength uA 10 46 11.3 46 10.1 46 11.4 47 10.2 43 11.5 46 10.3 38 11.6 43 10.4 32 11.7 39 10.5 19 11.8 35 10.6 9 11.9 28 10.7 8 12 16 10.8 16 12.1 7 10.9 26 12.2 8 11.0 35 12.3 18 11.1 39 12.4 30 11.2 42 12.5 36 12.6 41 These results were graphicated where the horizontal axis coincides with the movement of the plate and vertically, the fiel d strength was plotted. 9 0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00 88.5 99.5 1010.5 1111.5 1212.5 1313.5 1414.5 1515.5 1616.5 EXPERIMENTAL DATA CYCLOID 1 CYCLOID 2C u In this graphic it is clearly observed that the trajectories are not senoidals but coincides exactly with the empty spaces of the plate following the cycloidal paths, which are generated by a spinning wheel, which the tangential speed is the same as its translational speed. An experiment is yet to be made using the same equipment in which helical antennas will produce a circular polarization in order to obtain the field intensity pattern. It is demonst rated that the path of the electromagnetic radiations is not senoidal. Instead, the trajectories are cycloidal in plane polarization. The simple harmonic movement generates this path. This equipment is very simple and not expensive, it is the same used by the universities teaching microwave antennas and communications. Therefore we encourage you to do the same experiment. It is very interesting to note that when generating electromagnetic radiations, an electron always takes part, which suggests that electr ons are not simple particles. By means of the proposed model, the change of the trajectory angle is explained, when waves are refracted by passing from a less denser to a more denser media and vice versa. One of the particles is slowed down by electrostati c attraction, but the other, follows with the same velocity for a very short period of time, but enough to change the angle of the trajectory of the system. The corpuscle properties of electromagnetic radiations are set by the existence of the two particle s but, on the other hand, the undulating properties are produced by the rotation of these, solving the dual personality problem of corpuscle -wave. This model is compatible with the way the system frequency is coded, as compared with the way the time is set when the earth makes a full turn around the sun. It has been said that light is its own antiparticle, or in other words, it is not possible to determine if observed light comes from matter or antimatter, opening the possibility that light 10 may have two ele ctric charges, since one of the differences between matter an antimatter consist in the sign of their electric charges, when they have them. The particles that form the photon, for their extremely small mass when standing still, could be called positrino a nd electrino. The fact that Newton did not observe collisions in two light beams that cross one another is due to the fact that photons do not have matter between their particles, and hence, the probability of a collision is greatly reduced due to the larg e amount of hollow space. ING. VICTOR M. URBINA BOLLAND Av. Urbina 4, Parque Industrial Naucalpan Edo. de México México CP 53489 Tel (525) 308 -2315 Fax (525) 301 -0863 vurbina@qfoliar.com.mx GLOSSARY m Photon mass c light velocity in vacuum ( sm810998.2×) r particle radius of gyration k Coulomb constant ( 22910897.8CNm× ) f frequency, Hz. l wavelength, m. h Planck constant ( .sec3410626.6joules−× ) p 3.1416 q particl e charge ( Coulombs1810653.2−× ) E energy in Joules. d distance between particles (2r) Ekt translational kinetic energy, Joules. Ekr rotational kinetic energy, Joules. I inertia moment 2mKg⋅ w angular velocity, rad / sec.

arXiv:physics/0005065v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 24 May 2000Kinetic Slip Condition, van der Waals Forces, and Dynamic Contact Angle Len M. Pismen and Boris Y. Rubinstein Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion–Israel Inst itute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. (February 2, 2008) Abstract The profiles of a spreading wetting film are computed taking in to account intermolecular forces and introducing a kinetic slip condi tion at a molecular cut-off distance. This eliminates the stress singularity, s o that both “true” and “visible” contact angles are defined unequivocally. The “true” contact angle at the cut-off distance depends on the slip length as wel l as on the edge propagation speed, but not on gravity or asymptotic inclina tion angle. These macroscopic factors influence, however, the “visible” cont act angle observed in the interval where the actual film profile departs from the i ntermediate asymptotic curve. I. INTRODUCTION The two basic unsolved problems in the theory of a moving thre e-phase contact line are defining the contact angle and resolving the infamous vis cous stress singularity. Dif- ferent approaches to both problems, neither of them satisfa ctory, have been reviewed by Shikhmurzaev [1]. Even under equilibrium conditions, the s tructure of the three-phase re- gion cannot be understood without taking into account inter molecular interactions between the fluid and the solid support [2–4]. It becomes apparent tha t motion of a contact line is an 1intrinsically mesoscopic problem, and the dynamical theory should blend factors cont ributed by hydrodynamics and physical kinetics. The “standard” equilibrium contact angle θeis defined by the Young–Laplace formula σv−σl=σcosθe. (1) which involves surface tension σof an interface between two semi-infinite fluid phases (in the simplest case, a one-component liquid and its vapor) and (no n-measurable) surface tensions between the solid support and either fluid, σlandσv. Since, by definition, the standard surface tension refers to a boundary between semi-infinite p hases, the surface properties should be modified when the three-phase region falls within t he range of intermolecular forces, and therefore the classical formula is likely to fai l in a close vicinity of the contact line. This region is too small to be detected by available mea surement techniques, but modification of interfacial properties is often revealed by the formation of a precursor film. Thus, even under equilibrium conditions the contact angle, generally, varies with the distance from the contact line and cannot be defined unequivocally. In a dynamical situation, such as wetting, spreading or draw -down of a meniscus, the interfacial curvature, and hence, the change of the contact angle, are further influenced by the viscous stress. A properly defined contact angle fixes the boundary condition at the edge of an advancing or receding film and is therefore a necessary i ngredient for computation of macroscopic flows, influenced also by external forces, such a s gravity, and by changes in tem- perature and chemical composition through buoyancy and Mar angoni effect. Macroscopic measurements yield the so-called “visible” contact angle, differing from both the “standard” value in Eq. (1) and a hypothetical “true” (microscopic) val ue. Both “true” and visible contact angles should depend on the flow velocity and are subj ect to hysteresis. One should be warned that the very notion of a “true” interfac ial angle is precarious, since it extrapolates the concept of a sharp interface of a continu ous theory to molecular distances. This notion is eliminated altogether in molecular simulati ons [5,6] and in diffuse interface theories [7–10]. In continuum theories incorporating inte rmolecular forces the “true” contact 2angle can be defined at most at the molecular cut-off distance d. This is sometimes forgotten when hydrodynamic theory leads to the appearance of unphysi cally narrow boundary layers. Bearing in mind limitations of continuum mechanics extende d to molecular scales, we attempt in this communication to combine the standard hydro dynamic theory with a simple kinetic description of sliding motion in the first molecular layer adjacent to the solid support. The thickness of the sliding layer is identified with the cut- off length in the van der Waals interaction potential; thus, the theory is expected to oper ate at about the same crude level as the classroom derivation of the van der Waals equation of s tate [11]. The paper is organized as follows. We start in Section II with a detailed discussion of the slip condition. Basic equations in lubrication approxi mation are formulated in Section III. Intermediate asymptotics of the solutions at relative ly short macroscopic distances from the contact line, where gravity still does not come into play , are discussed in Section IV. Solutions describing the form of a stationary meniscus on a m oving inclined plane are given in Section V. II. SLIP CONDITION With any finite contact angle given as a boundary condition, a moving contact line still cannot be described within the framework of conventional hy drodynamics, since the classical no-slip condition on a solid substrate generates a multival ued velocity and, hence, an infinite stress in the vicinity of a contact line, leading formally to an infinite drag force [12,13]. The most common way to eliminate the viscous stress singular ity is to impose a phe- nomenological slipcondition. Presence of slip at a microscopic scale comparab le with inter- molecular distances is an established fact in Maxwell’s [14 ] kinetic theory of gases; for dense fluids it is a feasible hypothesis supported by molecular dyn amics simulations [5,6]. The two alternatives are slip conditions of “hydrodynamic” and “ki netic” type. The version of the slip condition most commonly used in fluid- mechanical theory is a linear relation between the velocity component along the so lid surface usand the shear stress 3[15,16]. The proportionality constant contains a phenomen ological parameter – slip length – characterizing intermolecular interaction between the fl uid and the solid; in liquids this length should be small, so that the effect of sliding becomes s ignificant only in the vicinity of a moving contact line where stresses are very large. This con dition has been widely used for modeling macroscopic flows involving the contact line motio n [17–21]. It does not eliminate the stress singularity but only makes it integrable, thus le aving a logarithmic (integrable) singularity of the interfacial curvature. This leads forma lly to a breakdown of the commonly used lubrication approximation in the vicinity of a contact line that can be remedied only by further ad hoc assumptions, making the slip length dependent on the distan ce from the contact line [18,21]. This drawback may be mere technical, but a more serious disad vantage of hydrodynamic slip theories lies in their inherent inability to predict th e dynamic contact angle. Thus, the two basic problems become disentangled, and, in addition to a phenomenological slip coeffi- cient, empirical relationships between the velocity and co ntact angle have to be introduced in model computations. Another version of the slip condition, rooted in physical ki netics [22–25], defines the slip velocity through the gradient of thermodynamic potential walong the solid surface: us=−D nkT∇w, (2) where Dis surface diffusivity, nis particle number density, kis Boltzmann constant, T is temperature, and ∇is two-dimensional gradient operator along the solid surfa ce. The condition (2) follows rather naturally from considering ac tivated diffusion in the first molec- ular layer adjacent to the solid. In contrast to the hydrodyn amic slip condition, the kinetic condition (2) can be used to define the “true” dynamic contact angle at the contact line in a unique way, as we shall see below. Extrapolating the continuous description of fluid motion to a molecular scale might be conceptually difficult but unavoidable as far as interfacial dynamics is concerned. Long- range intermolecular interactions, such as London–van der Waals forces, still operate on a 4mesoscopic scale where continuous theory is justified, but t hey should be bounded by an inner cut-off dof atomic dimensions. Thus, distinguishing the first molecu lar layer from the bulk fluid becomes necessary even in equilibrium theory. In dynam ic theory, the motion in the first molecular layer can be described by Eq. (2), whereas the bulk fluid obeys hydrodynamic equations supplemented by the action of intermolecular for ces. Equation (2) serves then as the boundary condition at the solid surface. Moreover, at th e contact line, where the bulk fluid layer either terminates altogether or gives way to a mon omolecular precursor film, the same slip condition defines the slip component of the flow patt ern, and Eq. (2) can be used to estimate the “true” contact angle if it is assumed that the motion is pure slip at the contact line. Miller and Ruckenstein [26] used the dependence of the disjo ining pressure generated by London–van der Waals forces in a wedge to compute the “true ” equilibrium contact angle. This result has been used by Hocking [27] to set the bou ndary condition at the contact line in the hydrodynamic theory, and by Ruckenstein and Dunn [23] to compute the slip velocity. Order-of-magnitude estimates show, how ever, that at small inclination angles necessary to justify the lubrication approximation used in hydrodynamic theory the correction to disjoining pressure due to surface inclinati on is extremely small, and the “true” angle may be formally attained only at distances far below at omic dimensions. At higher inclination angles, the computation fails technically, si nce the interface must be curved, and its form should be determined by a very complicated integro- differential equation involving intermolecular interactions as well as viscous stress and s urface tension. We propose to use the kinetic slip condition in the another wa y, to obtain a relation between the slip velocity and the thermodynamic potential a t the contact line by considering the motion at the point where the film thins down to the minimal thickness h=d. This is the advancing edge of a wetting film, or a retreating edge of a dewetting film, dividing it from the dry solid surface. If the fluid is not volatile, the mo tion at this point should be pure slip, while standard caterpillar motion is retained at observable macroscopic distances. In the case of an advancing wetting film, we expect that the lea ding edge is followed by a 5thin precursor film where surface tension is negligible and t he action of intermolecular forces driving the advancing film is balanced by viscous dissipatio n. The boundary condition at the leading edge will be then the same Eq. (2) with usreplaced by the edge propagation speed Uand∇wcomputed at h=dwith surface tension neglected. Another possibility might be to assume that the slip motion a t the edge is driven by the potential drop over the molecular cut-off distance d. This yields, by analogy with Eq. (2), the boundary condition at the contact line U=−D nkTw(d) d, (3) where w(d) is the thermodynamic potential of the film of the minimal thi ckness; the potential at the dry surface is taken as zero. After w(d) is computed as in the following Section, Eq. (3) turns into a condition relating the curvature at the contact line with the propagation speed. We shall see that this condition leads in fact to non-physica l results at small propagation velocities. At large velocities, computations using the al ternative boundary conditions yield practically the same results (see Section IV). III. BASIC EQUATIONS AND SCALING We shall use the lubrication approximation, which is formal ly obtained by scaling the two-dimensional gradient operator along the solid surface ∇ ∝ǫ,ǫ≪1. Respectively, time is scaled as ∂t∝ǫ2, the velocity in the direction parallel to the solid support asu∝ǫand transverse velocity as v∝ǫ2. This implies that the thermodynamic potential wis constant across the layer. The gradient of win the direction parallel to the solid support serves as the forcing term in the Stokes equation. The velocity profile u(z) across the film verifies ∇w=ηuzz, u z(h) = 0, u(d) =us, (4) where ηis the dynamic viscosity. We use here the no-stress boundary condition on the free surface z=h, but replace the usual no-slip boundary condition on the sol id support 6u(0) = 0 by the slip condition at the molecular cut-off distance dwithusgiven by Eq. (2). The solution in the bulk layer d < z < h is u=−η−1/bracketleftBig λ2+h(z−d)−1 2(z2−d2)/bracketrightBig ∇w, (5) where λ=/radicalBig Dη/nkT is the effective slip length. The general balance equation for the film thickness h, obtained from the kinematic condition on the free surface, can be presented as a generali zed Cahn–Hilliard equation, where the two-dimensional flux jin the plane aligned with the solid support is proportional to the two-dimensional gradient of the potential w: ht+∇ ·j= 0,j=−η−1Q(h)∇w. (6) The effective mobility η−1Q(h) is obtained by integrating Eq. (5) across the layer. Includ ing also the constant slip velocity u=−λ2η−1∇win the slip layer 0 < z < d , we have Q(h) =/bracketleftBig λ2h+1 3(h−d)3/bracketrightBig . (7) Since both λanddare measurable on the molecular scale (see the estimates in t he end of this Section), this expression does not differ in a macrosc opically thick layer from the standard shallow water mobility Q0=1 3h3, and the correction becomes significant only in the immediate vicinity of the contact line. The potential wis computed at the free surface z=h. Taking into account surface tension, gravity, and van der Waals force, it is expressed as w=−σǫ2∇2h+gρ(h−αx)−A 6πh3, (8) where Ais the Hamaker constant, gis acceleration of gravity, ρis density, σis surface tension, and ǫαis the inclination angle of the solid surface along the xaxis. The dummy small parameter ǫis the ratio of characteristic scales across and along the la yer; the relative scaling of different terms in Eq. (8) is formally consistent w henσ=O(ǫ−2). Further on, we suppress the dependence on the second coordinate in the plan e, replacing the Laplacian by d2/dx2. 7In the following, we shall consider the film with a contact lin e steadily advancing along thexaxis in the negative direction with the speed U. Then Eq. (6) can be rewritten in the comoving frame, thus replacing htbyUhx, and integrated once. Making use of the condition of zero flux through the contact line to removing the integrat ion constant yields −ηUh+Q(h)w′(x) = 0. (9) This equation can be further transformed using has the independent variable and y(h) =h2 x as the dependent variable. We rewrite the transformed equat ion introducing the capillary number Ca = |U|η/σǫ2, van der Waals length a=ǫ−1(|A|/6πσ)1/2, and gravity length b=ǫ(σ/gρ)1/2: hCa√y Q(h)+1 2y′′(h)−3a2 h4−1 b2/parenleftBigg 1−α√y/parenrightBigg = 0. (10) The boundary condition following from (2) and balancing int ermolecular forces and viscous dissipation at h=dtakes the form y(d) =/parenleftBig d4Ca/3λ2a2/parenrightBig2. (11) The alternative boundary condition (3), set at h=d, is rewritten, using Eq. (8) and ne- glecting the gravity term, as 1 2y′(d) =dCa λ2−a2 d. (12) Equation (10) contains three microscopic scales d, a, λ and a macroscopic gravity length b. The natural choice for dis the nominal molecular diameter, identified with the cut-o ff distance in the van der Waals theory. The standard value [3] i s 0.165nm. The slip length is likely to be of the same order of magnitude. The approximat e relation between viscosity ηand self-diffusivity Dmin a liquid [28] yields Dmη≈102kT/3πd. The surface diffusivity should be somewhat lower than the diffusivity in the bulk liqu id, and with D/D m≈0.1 we haveλ≈d. The van der Waals length adepends on the relative strength of liquid–liquid and liqui d– solid interactions. The Hamaker constant for the pair fluid– solid is defined [3] as 8A=π2n(Csns−Cfn)≡π2n2/tildewideC, (13) where Cs, Cfare constants in the long-range attraction potential C/r6, respectively, for the pairs of fluid–solid and fluid–fluid atoms removed at the dista ncer;nsis the solid number density; The effective interaction parameter/tildewideCis defined by the above identity. We shall assume A >0, which corresponds to the case of complete wetting. The est imate for surface tension [3] is σ≈1 24πCf(n/d)−2. This gives a≈2ǫ−1(/tildewideC/C f)1/2, so that a=O(d) when /tildewideC/C f=O(ǫ2). IV. INTERMEDIATE ASYMPTOTICS In the intermediate region, where hfar exceeds the microscopic scales d, a, λ but is still far less than the capillary length b, the film profile is determined by the balance between viscous stress and surface tension. The asymptotics of the t runcated Eq. (10) (with d, a, λ , andb−1set to zero) at h→ ∞ is y≍/parenleftBigg 3Calnh h0/parenrightBigg2/3 −2/parenleftbiggCa 9/parenrightbigg2/3 ln lnh h0/parenleftBigg lnh h0/parenrightBigg−1/3 +. . ., (14) where h0is an indefinite constant. The first term of this asymptotic ex pression has been obtained by Hervet and de Gennes [29], who have also reported the value of h0. This constant can be obtained by integrating Eq. (10) (with gravity neglec ted) starting from the boundary condition (11) or (12) and adjusting another necessary boun dary value to avoid runaway to±∞. There is a unique heteroclinic trajectory approaching the asymptotics (14). It is very sensitive to the initial conditions as well as to the mol ecular-scale factors operating close to the contact line. The growth of the inclination angl e is never saturated, as long as macroscopic factors (gravity or volume constraint) are not taken into account. Equation (10) can be integrated using the shooting method: e ither starting from the boundary condition (11) and adjusting y′(d) or starting from the boundary condition (12) 9and adjusting y(d) to arrive at the required asymptotics at h→ ∞. Further on, we will measure all lengths in the molecular units and set dto unity. The solution in the intermediate region depends on the physical parameters a, λas well as on the capillary number Ca that includes the propagation speed U. The latter’s impact is most interesting for our purpose. Examples of the computed dependence of the inclination angl eθ=/radicalBig y(h) on the local film thickness husing the boundary condition (11) at different values of Ca ar e given in Fig. 1. The curves using the boundary condition (12) in Fig. 1b, show peculiar (apparently, non- physical) reversal of the dependence of the inclination ang le on Ca, resulting in an increase of the “true” contact angle θ(d) with decreasing velocity. Indeed, at U→0 this condition yields a spurious balance between intermolecular forces an d surface tension leading to an unstable stationary state, similar to the erroneous inference of a we tting film with the right contact angle in Ref. [30] discussed in our earlier paper [31 ]. The anomaly, however, quickly disappears at observable distances. The curve segments at h≫1 can be fit to the asymptotic formula (14) to obtain the integration constant h0. It should be noted that the asymptotic formula (14) can be us ed only when hislogarithmically large, and the convergence, as estimated by the second term, is slow; therefore h0can be only obtained approximately from the computed profile s. The dependence of h0on Ca based on Fig. 1a is shown in Fig. 2. We see here a rather str ong variation of the integration constant, unlike a single “uni versal” value reported in Ref. [29]. V. DRAW-DOWN OF A MENISCUS The simplest stationary arrangement including gravity is r ealized when an inclined plane, dry at x→ −∞ slides in the direction of a wetting layer. Solving Eq. (10) w ith the same boundary condition (12) as before brings now to the asymptot icsy=√αath→ ∞ that corresponds to a horizontal layer. The curves y(h) seen in Fig. 3a and Fig. 3c all depart from the intermediate a symptotic curve obtained for infinite bas in the preceding Section. However, due to extreme sensiti vity 10of the shooting method to the choice of the missing initial va lue, one has to integrate from the outset the full equation rather than trying to start inte gration from some point on the intermediate asymptotic curve. One can see that the maximum inclination angle (which may be identified with the “visible” contact angle) grows as bdecreases. This increase is, however, not pronounced when the initial incline (identified with the “true” contact angle) is high. One can distinguish therefore between two possibilities: fi rst, when the main dissipation is due to kinetic resistance in the first monomolecular layer th at raises y(d), and second when the viscous dissipation prevails and the inclination angle keeps growing in the region of bulk flow. Take note that even in the latter case the region where th e inclination and curvature are high are close to the contact line when measured on a macro scopic scale. Figure 4 shows the dependence of the “visible” contact angle θm, defined as the maximum inclination angle and observed in the range where the gravit y-dependent curves depart from the intermediate asymptotics, on the capillary number Ca. T he lower curve is a fit θ∝Ca1/3 to the data of Fig. 3b. The points of the upper curve are comput ed in a similar way using the boundary condition (12). The first result appears to be mo re physically reasonable, since the angle drops close to zero at small flow velocities, while i n the alternative computation it remains finite (see also the discussion in the preceding Se ction). The proportionality of the inclination angle to Ca1/3(which leads to the well-known Tanners law of spreading [4]) is a property of the intermediate asymptotics (14) that can b e deduced from scaling [31], although the universality is slightly impaired by the depen dence of the integration constant h0on velocity seen in Fig. 2.. The one-third law is inherited by the dependence θm(Ca), since the inclination angle reaches its maximum while the gr avity-dependent profile is still close to the intermediate asymptotic curve. Fig. 5 shows the actual shape of the meniscus obtained by inte grating the equation h′(x) =/radicalBig y(h),h(0) = d. The dependence of the draw-down length ∆ (computed as the difference between the actual position of the contact line an d the point where the continua- tion of the asymptotic planar interface hits the solid surfa ce) on the gravity length is shown in Fig. 6. 11VI. CONCLUSION It comes, of course, as no surprise that introducing a molecu lar cut-off and applying a kinetic slip condition to the first molecular layer resolves the notorious singularities of hy- drodynamic description. The hydrodynamic singularities a re eliminated, however, only at molecular distances, and are still felt in sharp interface c urvatures at microscopic distances identified here as the intermediate asymptotic region. The c omputations are eased consid- erably when non-physical divergence of both viscous stress and attractive Lennard– Jones potential beyond the cut-off limit are eliminated. As a resul t, the stationary equations can be solved by shooting method with reasonable accuracy in a ve ry wide range extending from molecular to macroscopic scales, and the “true” contact ang le at the cut-off distance can be defined unequivocally. The “true” angle (unobservable by available techniques) de pends on the slip length as well as on the edge propagation speed, but not on gravity or as ymptotic inclination angle. These macroscopic factors influence, however, the “visible ” contact angle observed in the interval where the actual film profile departs from the interm ediate asymptotic curve. Since the latters location, though not shape, depends on the molec ular-scale factors, as well as on the cut-off distance, the visible angle depends on both molec ular and macroscopic factors. Thus, the lack of simple recipes for predicting the value of d ynamic contact angle is deeply rooted in the mesoscopic character of the contact line. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research has been supported by the Israel Science Found ation. LMP acknowledges partial support from the Minerva Center for Nonlinear Physi cs of Complex Systems. 12REFERENCES [1] Yu.D. Shikhmurzaev, “Moving contact lines in liquid/li quid/solid systems”, J. Fluid Mech. 334211 (1997). [2] B.V. Derjaguin, N.V. Churaev and V.M. Muller, Surface Forces (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1987). [3] J.H. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic Press, New York, 1992) [4] P.G. de Gennes, “Wetting: statics and dynamics”, Rev. Mo d. Phys. 57, 827 (1985). [5] J. Koplik, J.R. Banavar and J.F. Willemsen, “Molecular d ynamics of a fluid flow at solid surfaces”, Phys. Fluids A 1, 781 (1989). [6] P.A. Thompson and M.O. Robbins, “Simulations of contact -line motion: slip and the dynamic contact angle”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 766 (1989). [7] D.M. Anderson, G.B. McFadden, and A.A. Wheeler, “Diffuse -interface methods in fluid mechanics”, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30139 (1998). [8] G.J. Merchant and J.B. Keller, “Contact angles”, Phys. F luidsA4, 477 (1992). [9] P. Seppecher, “Moving contact lines in the Cahn-Hilliar d theory”, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 34 977 (1996). [10] L.M. Pismen and Y. Pomeau, “Disjoining potential and sp reading of thin liquid layers in the diffuse interface model coupled to hydrodynamics”, su bmitted to Phys. Rev. E (1999). [11] L.D. Landau, and E.M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics , Pergamon Press, 1980. [12] C. Huh and L.E. Scriven, “Hydrodynamical model of stead y movement of a solid/liquid/fluid contact line”, J. Coll. Int. Sci. 35, 85 (1971). [13] E.B. Dussan V and S.H. Davis, “On the motion of a fluid-flui d interface along a solid 13surface”, J. Fluid Mech. 65, 71 (1974). [14] J.C. Maxwell, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 70, 231 (1867). [15] H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics , Dover, 1932. [16] D. Bedeaux, A.M. Albano and P. Mazur, “Boundary conditi ons and non-equilibrium thermodynamics”, Physica A 82, 438 (1976). [17] L.M. Hocking, “A moving fluid interface. Part 2. The remo val of the force singularity by a slip flow ”, J. Fluid Mech. 79, 209 (1977). [18] H.P. Greenspan, “On the motion of a small viscous drople t that wets a surface”, J. Fluid Mech. 84, 125 (1978). [19] L.M. Hocking, “The spreading of a thin drop by gravity an d capillarity”, Quart. J. Mech.. Appl. Math. 34, 55 (1981). [20] L.M. Hocking, “Spreading and instability of a viscous fl uid sheet”, J. Fluid Mech. 211, 373 (1990). [21] P.J. Haley and M.J. Miksis, “The effect of the contact lin e on droplet spreading”, J. Fluid Mech. 223, 57 (1991). [22] T.D. Blake and J.M. Haynes, “Kinetics of liquid-liquid displacement”, J. Colloid Inter- face Sci. 30, 421 (1969). [23] E. Ruckenstein and C.S. Dunn, “Slip velocity during wet ting of solids”, J. Coll. Interface Sci.59, 135 (1977). [24] F, Brochard-Wyart and P.G. de Gennes, “Dynamics of part ial wetting”, Adv. Coll. Interface Sci. 39, 1 (1992). [25] E. Ruckenstein, “The moving contact line of a droplet on a smooth solid”, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 170, 284 (1995). 14[26] C.A. Miller and E. Ruckenstein, “The origin of flow durin g wetting of solids”, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 48, 368 (1974). [27] L.M. Hocking, “The influence of intermolecular forces o n thin fluid layers”, Phys. Fluids A5, 793 (1993). [28] Ia.I. Frenkel, Kinetic Theory of Liquids , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1946. [29] H. Hervet and P.G. de Gennes, “The dynamics of wetting: p recursor films in the wetting of ‘dry’ solids”, C. R. Acad. Sci. 299 II 499 (1984). [30] P.G. de Gennes, X.Hue, and P.Levinson, “Dynamics of wet ting: local contact angles”, J. Fluid Mech. 212, 55 (1990). [31] L.M. Pismen, B.Y. Rubinstein, and I. Bazhlekov, “Sprea ding of a wetting film under the action of van der Waals forces”, Phys. Fluids 12, xxx (2000). 15FIGURES (a) 5 10 15 20ln h246810tanq 1ê161ê81ê41ê2124 (b) 5 10 15 20ln h246810tanq 1ê81ê41ê2124 FIG. 1. Dependence of the local surface inclination tan θon the local film thickness at different values of the capillary number Ca computed using the boundar y condition (11) (a) and (12) (b). The numbers at the curves show the values of Ca. Other paramet ers used in all computations are λ= 1,a= 1/√ 3, 1 2 3 4Ca 0.81.21.41.61.82h0 FIG. 2. Dependence of h0on Ca computed using the data from Fig. 1a. 16(a) 24681012ln h12345tanq 45678 (b) 24681012ln h12345678tanq 1ê161ê2124 (c) 24681012ln h2468tanq 1248 FIG. 3. Dependence of the local surface inclination angle θon the film thickness (a) at Ca= 1, α= 1 and different values of the gravity length b; (b) at b= 104and different values of the capillary number Ca; (c) at Ca= 1, b= 104and different values of the asymptotic inclination angle α. The numbers at the curves show the values, respectively, of 2log b, Ca and α. Other parameters used in all computations are λ= 1,a= 1/√ 3. 171 2 3 4 5Ca1234567tanqm FIG. 4. Dependence of the visible contact angle θmon Ca. 246810ln x24681012ln h 8 4567 FIG. 5. The shape of the meniscus for different values of b. The numbers at the curves show the values of 2log b. 2.5 33.5 4log b78910lnD FIG. 6. The dependence of the draw-down length ∆ on log b. 18

arXiv:physics/0005066v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 24 May 2000Disjoining Potential and Spreading of Thin Liquid Layers in the Diffuse Interface Model Coupled to Hydrodynamics Len M. Pismen1and Yves Pomeau2 (1) Department of Chemical Engineering and Minerva Center f or Nonlinear Physics of Complex Systems, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Isr ael. (2) Laboratoire de Physique Statistique de l’Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure, associ´ e au CNRS, 24 Rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France. (July 24, 2013) The hydrodynamic phase field model is applied to the problem of film spreading on a solid surface. The disjoin- ing potential, responsible for modification of the fluid prop - erties near a three-phase contact line, is computed from the solvability conditions of the density field equation with ap - propriate boundary conditions imposed on the solid support . The equation describing the motion of a spreading film are derived in the lubrication approximation. In the case of quasi-equilibrium spreading, is shown that the correct sha rp- interface limit is obtained, and sample solutions are obtai ned by numerical integration. It is further shown that evapora- tion or condensation may strongly affect the dynamics near the contact line, and accounting for kinetic retardation of the interphase transport is necessary to build up a consistent t he- ory. I. INTRODUCTION One of long-standing hydrodynamic riddles is the na- ture of viscous flow in the vicinity of a three-phase (gas-liquid-solid) contact line and the related problem of “true” and “apparent” dynamic contact angles [1,2]. The answer to the riddle must be, in fact, physico-chemical rather than purely hydrodynamic, since it depends on processes in the immediate vicinity of the three-phase boundary. The early detected paradox of a logarithmi- cally divergent force required to displace the contact line [3] directly follows from the multivaluedness of the ve- locity field at the contact line – if standard viscous hy- drodynamics with a no-slip condition on the solid surface is to be believed. This paradox has been swept under a carpet rather than resolved by introducing a boundary condition with a stress or velocity dependent slip [4,5]. A drawback of hydrodynamic slip theories lies in their inherent inability to predict the dynamic contact angle. As a remedy, empirical relationships between the veloc- ity and contact angle have to be introduced in model computations. Clearly, intermolecular forces, that determine the static contact angle to begin with, should have a say in a dynamic situation. Their direct action is, however, restricted to an immediate vicinity of the contact line,which is unobservable under available experimental res- olution, so that an apparent contact angle seen at meso- scopic distances has to be strongly influenced by outer hydrodynamic conditions. Near the contact line itself, the properties of the fluid are different from those in the bulk, and even a common continuum description becomes questionable. Different approaches to description of the fluid motion in the vicinity of the three-phase boundary have been tried during the last two decades. The most straight- forward way is to introduce intermolecular forces into the hydrodynamic equations of motion. This would lead, strictly speaking, to very difficult nonlocal equations, in- corporating also the effects of variable density and diffuse interfaces [6]. Even in the sharp interface limit, a non- local dependence on the shape of the free interface leads to integro-differential equations which nobody as yet at- tempted to solve. A rational formulation is possible in lubrication approximation [2], when the action of inter- molecular forces reduces to a simple expression for dis- joining pressure between parallel vapor-liquid and liquid - solid interphase boundaries [7]. This, however, does not eliminate the stress singularity, unless in the case of com- plete wetting when a sharp contact line is replaced by a gradual transition from a precursor film to a liquid film of macroscopic thickness [2]. At the same time, the usual expression for London–van der Waals forces leads to dis- joining pressure divergent at small distances and neces- sitating a molecular-scale cut-off and leaving the “true” contact angle undetermined. This may be formally cor- rected by taking account of surface inclination [8], but the correction becomes effective at non-physical submolecu- lar distances. A radical solution is abandoning the continuum ap- proach altogether in the immediate vicinity of the contact line. Slip is feasible on a microscopic scale where it may follow from activated diffusion of a first molecular layer [9]. Direct numerical simulations of molecular dynamics clearly demonstrate the effects of a diffuse boundary and effective slip at molecular distances [10,11]. Such simula- tions, however, cannot involve macroscopic volumes, and no ways to incorporate them in a macroscopic descrip- tion are known. An alternative approach is to retain continuum description but to treat either vapor-liquid, or fluid-solid interface, or both as a separate phase with 1properties different from the bulk fluid. This approach was adopted by Shikhmurzaev [12] who relied also on de- viation from thermodynamic equilibrium near the con- tact line as well as on the presence of a residual film to avoid the divergences and explain the difference between the static and dynamic contact angles. Treating the vapor-liquid interface as a separate phase may be, indeed, justified when surfactants are present, but otherwise a more natural way to account for its spe- cial properties of is to consider it as a region interpolatin g between the two phases. The origin of this approach is in the diffuse interface model going back to van der Waals himself [13]. Much later, it became prominent in the phase field models [14], used mostly in phenomenologi- cal theory of solidification where a fictitious phase field, rather than density, was used as a continuous variable changing across the interphase boundary. The theory of van der Waals was widely used for description of equi- librium fluid properties, including surface tension and line tension in three-phase fluid systems [15]. Applica- tions of this theory to dynamical processes in fluids is much more difficult, as it requires coupling to hydrody- namics. The applicable equations were formulated rather recently [16,17]. Seppecher [18] and Jacqmin [19] solved the equations of the continuous density field coupled to the Stokes equation numerically in a small inner region near the contact line, matching it to the outer region where the standard sharp-boundary hydrodynamic limit applies. The prominent feature of the flow in the inner re- gion was a substantial advective mass transport through the interphase boundary which served as an effective slip mechanism relieving the viscous stress singularity. The aim of this communication is a rational analysis of the hydrodynamic phase field (diffuse interface) model based on the lubrication approximation. After formu- lating the basic equations in Section II, we reiterate the equilibrium relations defining the surface tension on all three kinds of interphase boundaries (Section III A) and discuss appropriate boundary conditions on the solid sur- face (Section III B). This is followed by approximate computation of the density profile, equilibrium chemi- cal potential and energy of the fluid layer (Sections III C, III D). The results of 1 dcomputations further serve as a basic “vertical” structure of the lubrication theory of Section IV, where a slow dependence on the “horizon- tal” coordinate is added. We show that the equations give a correct sharp-interface limit in both static and dy- namic situation. The evolution equation derived in the lubrication approximation can be integrated numerically yielding the dependence of the spreading velocity on a driving force. We shall see in Section IVD that no singu- larities develop in the case when the boundary condition fixes a unique fluid density at the solid surface. This “quasi-equilibrium” theory is modified in Section V where a change of chemical potential across the fluid layer is taken into account. We start with discussingthe “vertical” structure of chemical potential associated with viscous and kinetic retardation of steady motion of a vapor-liquid interface, and identify the dilute (vapor) phase as the locus of substantial variation of chemical po- tential. The potential drop is then computed numerically in Section VB, yielding a relation between the disjoining potential and the flux across isodensity lines. This flux, which may be interpreted as incipient evaporation or con- densation may help to alleviate viscous stress singularity when the boundary conditions make a sharp three-phase contact line necessary. II. BASIC EQUATIONS A general phase field model coupled to hydrodynamics includes the following elements: (1) a dynamic equation of the phase field variable(s) derived from an appropri- ate energy functional; (2) a constituent relation defining the dependence of pressure or chemical potential on the phase variable(s); (3) the continuity equation; (4) the equation for a flow field u(x,t). In a one-component system, the appropriate phase field variable is density ρ, General hydrodynamic equa- tions for non-equilibrium systems with diffuse interphase boundaries are found in the recent review by Anderson et al[17]. The equation for the static density distribution is de- rived from the energy functional F=/integraldisplay Ld3x,L=ρf(ρ) +1 2K|∇ρ|2−µρ, (1) whereµis the Lagrange multiplier (chemical potential) that serves to insure the mass conservation condition. The corresponding Euler – Lagrange equation is K∇2ρ−∂ρ(ρf(ρ)) +µ= 0, (2) We shall suppose that the function f(ρ) is such that Eq. (2) admits two stable solutions, ρ=ρvandρ=ρl, separated by an unstable solution ρ=ρuandρv<ρu< ρl. The solutions are at Maxwell construction (i.e. have equal energy ρf(ρ)) atµ= 0, so that the chemical po- tential can serve as a bias parameter. The density field is coupled to hydrodynamics through the capillary tensor T=LI− ∇ρ⊗∂L/∂∇ρ, (3) where Iis the unity tensor. Eliminating the Lagrange multiplier with the help of Eq. (2) yields T= (1 2K|∇ρ|2+Kρ∇2ρ−p)I−K∇ρ⊗ ∇ρ, (4) where the thermodynamic pressure is defined as p= ρ2f′(ρ). 2Neglecting the inertial effects, the flow is described by the generalized Stokes equation ∇ ·(T+S) +F= 0, (5) whereF=−∇Vis an external force and Sis the viscous stress tensor with the components Sjk=η(∂jvk+∂kvj) + (ζ−2 3η)δjk∇ ·v, (6) whereη,ζare dynamic viscosities (generally, dependent onρ), andvjare components of the velocity field v. The system of equations is closed by the continuity equation ρt+∇ ·(ρv) = 0, (7) The Stokes equation (5) is rewritten using Eq. (3) as − ∇(p+V) +Kρ∇∇2ρ+∇ ·S= 0. (8) A more transparent equivalent form, which can be ob- tained directly from Eq. (3), includes, instead of pressure , the chemical potential defined by Eq. (2): − ∇V−Kρ∇µ+∇ ·(η∇v) +∇[(ζ+1 3η)∇ ·v] = 0. (9) Further on, we shall compute the density and velocity field assuming that the characteristic macroscopic length L∗of the flow field, as well as the scale of density varia- tion in the tangential direction far exceed the character- istic thickness ( K/f∗)1/2of the diffuse interface, where f∗is a characteristic value of f(ρ). This “thin interface” approximation is apt to break down in the vicinity of the contact line, unless it is complemented by the “lu- brication” approximation, which assumes a small angle between the (diffuse) interphase boundary and the solid surface. The applicability of this approximation depends as well on the boundary conditions at the solid surface. III. EQUILIBRIUM RELATIONS A. Surface tension and Young–Laplace relation Before approaching our main task of the analysis of motion in the vicinity of a three-phase boundary, it is necessary to clarify relevant properties of the dynamic phase field model for the basic case of a diffuse inter- face between semi-infinite phases. For a static interface, the phase field determines in a usual way the equilibrium surface tension [13,15]. The standard surface tension is defined as the energy per unit area of a flat interface sep- arating two semi-infinite phases. Static solutions depen- dent only on the coordinate znormal to the interface can be easily found by solving Eq. (2). Rescaling the coordi- nate by the characteristic width of the diffuse interface, and denotingg(ρ) =∂ρ[ρf(ρ)], (10) we have ρ′′(z)−g(ρ) +µ= 0. (11) The two static solutions are approached at z→ ±∞ , and the boundary is static at µ= 0. The interfacial energy is computed most easily by using as a dependent variable the distortion energy T=1 2ρ2 z. Then Eq. (11) is rewritten as T′(ρ)−g(ρ) +µ= 0, (12) Integrating this proves that the distortion energy equals the potential energy at any point: 1 2ρ2 z=ρf(ρ)−µρ. (13) Using this “virial theorem”, we compute σ=/integraldisplay∞ −∞ρ2 zdz=/integraldisplayρl ρv/radicalbig 2(ρf(ρ)−µρ)dρ. (14) Solid-fluid interactions are characterized by an appro- priate boundary condition at the solid surface, as elabo- rated below. Generally, the density at the solid surface will be different in the vapor or liquid phase; we denote the respective values as ρsvandρsl. Accordingly, the “liquid-solid” or “vapor-solid” surface tension σlorσlis computed, respectively, by replacing one of the integra- tion limits in Eq. (14) by ρslorρsv. In the vicinity of a critical point, the appropriate func- tion, restricted to small deviations from the critical den- sityρc, is a cubic g(ρ) =ρ−ρc−(ρ−ρc)3. Since our aim is a qualitative description of a system far from crit- icality involving the vapor phase with negligible density, we shall choose a shifted cubic g(ρ) =ρ(1−2ρ)(1−ρ), (15) which is at Maxwell construction at µ= 0. Then f(ρ) =1 2ρ(1−ρ)2and the equilibrium surface tensions are computed as σ=/integraldisplay1 0ρ(1−ρ)dρ=1 6, σl=/integraldisplay1 ρslρ(1−ρ)dρ=1 6(1−ρsl)2(1 + 2ρsl), σv=/integraldisplayρsv 0ρ(1−ρ)dρ=1 6ρ2 sv(3−2ρsv). (16) The first formula can be also obtained directly using the standard kink solution that approaches ρv= 0 atz→ ∞ andρl= 1 atz→ −∞ : ρ0(z) = (1 +ez)−1. (17) This solution may be, however, distorted in the vicinity of a solid wall. 3The expressions for σandσ±combine to the Young– Laplace formula σv−σl=σcosθ, (18) whereθis the “standard” contact angle that should be observed at distances much larger than the thickness of the transition layer, i.e. unity in the dimensionless units of Eq. (11). The Young–Laplace formula is a consequence of the Noether theorem applied to solutions of Eq. (2). Suppose that the solid surface is coincident with the xaxis (z= 0) andρ(x,z) tends toρgatz→ ∞. Very far on the left (x→ −∞ ) the vapor is close to the solid, so that ρ(x,z) tends to a solution ρ(z) of Eq. (11) with µ= 0, such thatρ(0) =ρsvandρ→ρvasz→ ∞. On the other end, forx→+∞, the liquid is close to the solid, that isρ(x,z) tends for xlarge positive and z≪xtoward a solutionρ(z) of Eq. (11) with µ= 0 andρ(0) =ρsl andρ→ρlaszbecomes very large. For a given x, there is, however, a value of z, close to tan θ, such that there is a liquid-vapor interface and for z≫xtanθ,ρ becomes very close to ρv, as requested. If ρ(x,z) satisfies these conditions, the liquid-vapor interface is inclined a t the angleθto the solid on scales much larger than the microscopic interface thickness (although this angle may change at a closer approach). The Young–Laplace formula follows from the invari- ance of the problem with respect to translations in the xdirection. Multiply Eq. (2) (with Krescaled to unity) by∂ρ/∂x , and integrate over zfromz= 0 to ∞. This yields, after integrating by parts d dx/braceleftbigg/integraldisplay∞ 0/bracketleftbig1 2(ρ2 x−ρ2 z)−ρf(ρ)/bracketrightbig dz/bracerightbigg = 0. (19) The braced expression is constant along the xaxis. This constant can be computed for xvery large negative and very large positive in the configuration just described. Equating the results, one gets: σv=σl+/integraldisplay∞ −∞/bracketleftbig1 2(ρ′ 0(ζ))2(cos2θ−sin2θ)−ρf(ρ)/bracketrightbigdζ cosθ, whereζis the coordinate normal to the vapor–liquid in- terface, and ρ′ 0(ζ) is the standard kink solution. The algebraic term reduces to1 2(ρ′ 0(ζ))2by Eq. (13), and the final result is the Young–Laplace formula (18). The result is not influenced by possible deviations from the standard contact angle at a close approach to the solid surface, but, of course, hinges on the applicability of Eq. (2). Since the actual inclination angle is apt to change at large distances due to external forces, such as gravity or dynamic pres- sure, the “standard” angle may be in fact unobservable at either small or large distances from the solid.B. Boundary conditions If the action of the solid on the density field is short- range (compared to the thickness of the diffuse interface), it can be accounted for by appropriate boundary condi- tions at the solid surface. The boundary conditions are usually assigned with the help of the Cahn construction [14,2] balancing the distortion energy, distributed over a layer of same order of magnitude as the thickness of the diffuse interface, and the energy of fluid–solid inter- action concentrated at the boundary. A more consistent way to arrive at the same boundary condition is to al- low a non-vanishing variation of the density at the solid boundaryδρswhen the energy functional (1) is varied. In one dimension, this leaves, after integrating by parts, the boundary term ρ′(0)δρs. If the dependence of the fluid–solid interaction energy on the fluid density near the wall is expressed by a quadratic polynomial γ(ρs) =γ0−γ1ρs+1 2γ2ρ2 s, (20) the coefficient at δρsvanishes, provided γ1−γ2ρs+ρ′(z)|ρ=ρs= 0. (21) which is the boundary condition equivalent to that ob- tained through the Cahn construction (although the lat- ter is expressed in an awkward integral form, including a radical with an indefinite sign). If one assumes that the solid–fluid interaction is short- range compared to the thickness of the diffuse vapor- liquid interface, it is likely prevail locally in the vicini ty of a solid wall. This corresponds to the limiting case of very large γ1,γ2, when a simpler Dirichlet boundary conditionρ=ρsis enforced on the solid surface. The rangeρv<ρs<ρlcorresponds then to partial wetting. With the latter boundary condition and the cubic g(ρ), the contact angle is cos θ=−1+6ρ2 s−4ρ3 s,and is close to 0 orπwhenρsis close, respectively, to 1 or −0. Ifρs= 1−a with 0< a≪1, we have θ= 2√ 3a. The contact angle is zero (complete wetting) at ρs≥1. This “standard” angle has nothing to do with a “true” contact angle at the solid surface. The later is not defined at all in the diffuse interface theory, since different isodensity levels behave in a qualitatively different way as the solid surface is approached. The only level that hits the solid surface at the right angle is ρ=ρs; the levels with ρ < ρ sare asymtotically parallel, and those with ρ>ρ santiparallel to the surface. A more consistent way to derive the boundary condi- tion is to start with a general expression for the energy of molecular interactions F=/integraldisplay /integraldisplay ρ(x)ρ(x′)V(|x−x′|)d3xd3x′(22) The mean-field energy functional (1) can be obtained from (22) assuming that the density changes on a char- acteristic scale far exceeding the range of the potential 4V(|x−x′|) and expanding ρ(x′) =ρ(x) + (x−x′)· ∇ρ(x) +.... The algebraic term in the Lagrangian (1) is obtained in the zeroth order, and the distortion en- ergy in the second order of the expansion. These expres- sions are modified when a solid boundary lies within the range of the interaction potential. The influence of the wall may be particularly strong in the standard case of Lennard–Jones interaction potential or a simplified ex- pressionV∝(x−x′)−6with a short-range hard-core cut-off, which gives the interaction energy diverging as z−3with the distance from the solid surface. The di- verging part of the energy may be taken as the surface energy potential that has to be minimized to obtain the density at the solid surface ρs. Under conditions when the bulk potential has two minima corresponding to low (vapor) and high (liquid) densities, the surface potential may also have two minima but the respective values, say, ρslandρsv, would be, generally, different from the bulk valuesρlandρv. This brings us to a Dirichlet boundary condition similar to that postulated above, but with the essential difference that two distinct values are allowed, and are likely to be chosen at the solid surface contacting, respectively, the liquid and vapor phase. Unlike the case when the surface density is unique, all isodensity levels in the range ρsv≤ρ≤ρslhit the solid surface. The boundary condition (21) also allows distinct den- sity levelsρsv∝negationslash=ρslin the areas of the solid surface bor- dering either vapor of liquid. Assuming, for example, 0< γ1=a≪1, γ2= 0, we have ρsv≈a, ρ sl≈1 +a. It appears, however, quite unnatural that the main term in the density expansion fixes the density gradient rather than the density itself, so that non-monotonic density profiles are forbidden in the above example and, on the contrary, enforced when γ1is negative. C. Density profile in a thin layer The interaction between the solid surface and the in- terphase boundary can be computed most easily in the case when both surfaces are parallel and normal to the zaxis. The static solution ρ(z) can be found by solving Eq. (11) subject to the appropriate boundary conditions at the solid wall. Solving the one-dimensional phase field equation in the form Eq. (12) is elementary; for the cubic g(ρ), the exact solution is expressed in elliptic functions. Finding an approximate solution satisfying the bound- ary condition ρ(0) =ρs= 1−awith|a| ≪1 is, however, more elucidating. We construct the solution by perturbing a standard kink solution ρ0(z−h) centered at z=h, e.g. Eq. (17) for the cubic g(ρ). The actual solution is approximated to the zero order by the standard kink only when ρ0(−h) is sufficiently close to unity; thus, hmust satisfy the con- ditionh >ln(1/a). The density profile is expanded in the small parameter a:ρ=ρ0(z−h) +aρ1(z;h) +.... (23) For the time being, we assume µ= 0. Then the first- order equation is ρ′′ 1(z) +g′(ρ0)ρ1= 0, (24) subject to the boundary condition ρ1(0) =−1 +a−1[1−ρ0(−h)]≈ −1 +ψ, (25) whereψ=a−1e−h≤1. Due to the exponential decay of interactions, the cor- rection to the zero-order solution is actually of a higher order of magnitude everywhere except an O(lna−1) vicin- ity of the wall, where ρ0is close to unity. On this interval, Eq. (29) can be replaced by the equation with constant coefficients ρ′′ 1(z)−ρ1(z) = 0, (26) The solution decaying at z→ ∞ is ρ1(z) =−e−z(1−ψ). (27) Ata>0, h> ln(2/a), the combined function ρa=ρ0+aρ1=/parenleftbig 1 +ez−h/parenrightbig−1−e−z/parenleftbig a−e−h/parenrightbig (28) reaches a maximum at z=1 2ln(aeh−1)>0 (Fig. 1). Such a solution describes a liquid layer sandwiched be- tween the vapor and the solid. At smaller values of h, the maximum disappears, and the solution can be interpreted as a pure vapor phase thickening near the solid wall. The same solution applies at a<0 when the density increases at the solid surface, whether it is approached from the liquid phase or directly from the vapor phase.The ap- proximation breaks down at h <ln(1/a), which is, in fact, below the minimal possible thickness of the dense layer in this model. 2 4 6 8 10 12z0.20.40.60.81r 345678 FIG. 1. Stationary density profiles. Numbers indicate the values of the nominal thickness h. 5If the boundary condition allows two alternative fluid densities, a solution with ρ(0) =av≪1 may be also possible. This solution, corresponding to vapor phase adjacent to the solid surface, is simply ρ≈ave−z; this solution can be viewed as a tail of the basic kink centered atz= lnav<0 (i.e. in the non-physical region). Non-monotonic density profiles are unstable. Since, however, the influence of the wall decays exponentially with the distance, the dynamics is practically frozen whenever the interphase boundary is separated from the wall by a layer thick compared to the characteristic width of the diffuse interface. D. Equilibrium chemical potential and energy A static solution with a fixed hexists only at a certain fixed value of µ, which can be determined using a solv- ability condition of the first-order equation. In a wider context, an appropriate solvability condition serves to ob - tain an evolution equation for the nominal position hof the interphase boundary. The technique of derivation of solvability conditions for a problem involving a semi- infinite region and exponentially decaying interactions is non-standard and therefore deserves special attention. An inhomogeneous first-order equation has a general form Lρ1+H(z) = 0, (29) containing an inhomogeneity H(z) and the linear opera- tor L=d2 dz2+g′(ρ0). (30) When Eq. (29) is defined on the infinite axis, the solv- ability condition of Eq. (29) appears due to the presence of an eigenfunction of Lwith zero eigenvalue related to the translational symmetry of the kink. The eigenfunc- tion, obtained by applying the symmetry operator d/dz, is simplyρ′ 0(z). The solvability condition is fixed by the orthogonality of the inhomogeneity to this eigenfunction: /integraldisplay∞ −∞ρ′ 0(z)H(z)dz= 0. (31) In the presence of a solid boundary, a difficulty arises, however, since the translational invariance is broken and no easily computable eigenfunction is available. In addi- tion, the orders of magnitudes in the perturbative scheme should be estimated in a non-standard way in view of the exponential decay of interactions. The difficulties are overcome with the help of asymp- totic matching technique similar to that employed in the theory of vortex dynamics [21]. The solvability condition is computed, similar to Eq. (31), using the translational eigenfunction on the infinite axis, but the integration isnot carried out over the entire axis (which now extends into the unphysical region z <0), but starts at some lo- cationz=z0>0 whereρdiffers from the asymptotic valueρ= 1 by anO(a) increment. This generates bound- ary terms in the solvability condition, which takes now the form /integraldisplay∞ z0dρ0(z−h) dzH(z)dz= /bracketleftbiggdρ0(z−h) dzdρ1(z) dz−d2ρ0(z−h) dz2ρ1(z)/bracketrightbigg z=z0.(32) The boundary values of the first-order solution ρ′ 1(z) are obtained by solving the first-order equation (29) di- rectly on the interval 0 ≤z≤z0, where Eq. (29) can be replaced by the equation with constant coefficients (26) with the added inhomogeneity H(z). The solution of this equation is ρ1(z) =ρ(h) 1(z) +/integraldisplayz 0G(z−ζ)H(ζ)dζ, (33) whereρ(h) 1is given by Eq. (27) and G(z−ζ) is Green’s function of Eq. (26). The last term can be neglected for certain inhomogeneities, provided the lower limit of the integral in the left-hand side of Eq. (32) can be shifted to −∞without introducing a significant error. The match- ing is successful when Eq. (32) reduces to a form inde- pendent of z0in the leading order. The simplest application of the above matching tech- nique is the computation of a constant value of chemical potentialµ=µcrequired to keep the kink at equilib- rium (possibly, unstable) at a given location z=h. In this case, the inhomogeneity in Eq. (26) is just a constant H=µc, and the integral in the left-hand side of Eq. (32) isµc[ρ0(∞)−ρ0(z0)] =−µc+O(a). Since this expres- sion remains unchanged in the leading order when z0is shifted to −∞, i.e.ρ0(z0) = 1−O(a) replaced by unity, it is sufficient to use in Eq. (32) the first term of Eq. (33) only. Retaining the leading term only, we obtain µc≡a2M(h) = 2a2ψ(1−ψ) = 2e−h/parenleftbig a−e−h/parenrightbig .(34) The first expression demonstrates that the computed chemical potentials in fact at most of O(a2), although the equation is nominally of the first order. The gained order of magnitude is due to the fast decay of interac- tions. Since the computed value is of a higher order, there is no need to correct the equilibrium profile com- puted in the preceding subsection to O(a). Fora >0, the function µc(h) passes a maximum at the same value h= ln(2/a) =O(1) that marks the transition from monotonic to non-monotonic density profiles. Sustain- ing a static profile requires a bias in favor of the liquid state, and the value of µcat the maximum represents the critical value of chemical potential required to nucleate a thick liquid layer on the solid surface. For a <0,µcin 6Eq. (34) is negative and increases monotonically with h; in this case, on the contrary, a bias in favor of the vapor phase is necessary to keep the interface stationary. For the boundary condition ρ′(0) =−a, the chemical potential of the dense solution is equivalent to Eq. (34) with the inverted sign of a. The rescaled value is M(h) =−2a−1e−h/parenleftbig 1 +a−1e−h/parenrightbig . (35) The correction to energy, defined as E(h) =/integraldisplay∞ 0/bracketleftbig ρf(ρ) +1 2ρ2 z/bracketrightbig dz=σ+a2/tildewideE(h),(36) also turns out to be of O(a2). The “virial theorem” used in Eq. (14) does not hold to this order when density is defined by the first-order function ρa. The best way to compute the energy is to use directly the variational for- mulation to relate it with the computed chemical po- tential. Requiring the one-dimensional energy functional (1) to be extremal with respect to hand using in the last termρ(z) =ρ0(z−h), we compute d/tildewideE dh=−M/integraldisplay∞ 0ρ′ 0(z−h)dz=M+O(a). (37) IV. MOTION IN A THIN LAYER A. Double-scale expansion Two-dimensional motion can be rationally treated in the familiar “lubrication approximation”, assuming the characteristic scale in the “vertical” direction (normal to the solid surface) to be much smaller than that in the “horizontal” (parallel) direction. When the inter- face is weakly inclined and curved, the density is weakly dependent on the coordinate xdirected along the solid surface. Respectively, the vertical velocity vis assumed to be much smaller than the horizontal velocity u. The scale ratio is determined by the contact angle, and should be set atO(a) =O(√ δ) to match the scaling of the phase field. The velocities v,ucorresponding to weak disequilibrium of the phase field considered above will be consistently scaled if one assumes ∂z=O(1), ∂x= O(√ δ), u=O(δ3/2), v=O(δ2). It is further necessary for consistent scaling of the hydrodynamic equations that the “constant” part of the chemical potential µ, associ- ated with interfacial curvature, disjoining potential, an d external forces and weakly dependent on x, be ofO(δ), while the “dynamic” part varying in the vertical direc- tion and responsible for motion across isodensity levels, be ofO(δ2). Further in this Section, we shall assume therefore that µ+Vis independent of z; this assumption will be re-examined in Section V.In two dimensions, the term ρxxis added to the inho- mogeneity in the first-order equation (29). In this order, the vertical density profile can be represented by the stan- dard kink solution ρ0(z−h(x,t)), and the xdependence is due to slow variation of hin the “horizontal” direction. Thus, ρxx=−ρ′ 0(z−h)hxx+ρ′′ 0(z−h)h2 x. (38) The respective contribution to the solvability condition is, in the leading order, −hxx/integraldisplay∞ −∞[ρ′ 0(z)]2dz=−σhxx, (39) while the contribution of the term containing h2 xvanishes in the leading order by symmetry. Another possible contribution to the solvability con- dition may come from external forces. In the presence of gravity directed against the zaxis, the equilibrium is achieved, according to Eq. (9), at µ=µ0−a2Gzrather thanµ=µ0= const. The rescaled acceleration of grav- ity is denoted as a2G, which presumes that it matches the other terms by the order of magnitude. The integral in Eq. (32) involving the variable part of µis mostly ac- cumulated in the diffuse interface region, so that we have in the leading order −G/integraldisplay∞ 0zρ′ 0(z−h)dz≈Gh. (40) Collecting Eqs. (39) and (40), we obtain the expression for the hydrostatic chemical potential µ=δ[M(h)−σhxx+G(h−z)], (41) whereM(h) is defined by Eq. (34) or (35). B. Statics in lubrication approximation Equation (41) will be used later on to investigate dy- namical processes where motion of the contact line is involved. In this subsection we investigate the statics of this lubrication approximation, and show how it relates to the general Young–Laplace result on the static contact angle. It seems to be important for the general consis- tency of the theory to have dynamical equations for the contact angle that reduce to the usual equilibrium the- ory in the absence of motion. In most realistic cases, the effect of gravity is negligible near the contact line, since gravitational forces are much weaker than molecu- lar forces. Therefore, the statics of the contact angle, at scales in between molecular length scales and the capil- lary length (that is the length scale beyond which gravity plays a role), depends on solutions of Equation (41) with- out the gravity term G(h−z). Moreover, as we want to 7study equilibrium situations where a liquid-vapor inter- face merges with the solid surface, the chemical potential µis set to its equilibrium value, 0, so that the equation under consideration is: M(h)−σhxx= 0. (42) In order to derive from this equation the Young– Laplace condition, one can use the relation (37) between the energy and chemical potential computed in the end of Section III D. We integrate Eq. (42) with the boundary conditions for the function h(x) such that for x→ −∞ , the vapor is close to the solid, while for x→ ∞, the liq- uid is close to the solid, until a height h(x)≈θx,θ≪1 where a liquid-vapor interface is situated. The relevant first integral of Eq. (42) reads: 1 2σh2 x=/tildewideE(h)−/tildewideE(h0), (43) whereh0is the root of M(h) that gives the thickness of the precursor film lying between the solid and the vapor phase;h0= ln(1/a) in the model with a cubic f(ρ) and Dirichlet boundary condition. The structure of Eq. (43) is obviously similar to the Young–Laplace formula. The capillary energy at very large negative x,/tildewideE(h0), is noth- ing but the solid-vapor surface tension, σv. The capillary energy at very large positive xwhere the vapor-liquid in- terface is far removed from the solid is the sum of the independent contributions of the solid-liquid and a free liquid-vapor interfaces. Integrating up to very large pos- itivex, whereh≈xθ, one gets therefore /tildewideE(∞) =σ+σl. Using this in Eq. (43) and subtracting σfrom both sides yields σ−1 2σθ2≈σcosθ=σv−σl, (44) which is the sought after Young–Laplace condition, de- rived from the equations of the lubrication approximation for the position of the liquid-vapor interface. C. Equations of motion in lubrication approximation The horizontal velocity uis determined from the hori- zontal component of the Stokes equation. Adding gravity as an external force, we write the leading order equation as −ρ0(z−h)Px+ (ηuz)z= 0, (45) where the effective pressure Pis defined as P=Gαx+M(h)−σhxx+G(h−z), (46) This expression follows from Eq. (41), with the addition of the gravity term acting when the supporting plane is weakly inclined. The inclination angle αmust be ofO(√ δ) to match by the order of magnitude the other terms in the equation. The density profile is given in the leading order by the standard kink solution (17) centered at the nominal interface position h(x) slowly varying in the horizontal direction. The solution of Eq. (45) satisfying the no-slip bound- ary condition on the solid boundary and the no stress condition at infinity has a general form u(z) =η−1PxΨ(z;h). (47) The function Ψ( z;h) depends on an assigned dependence of viscosity on density, but the flux uρ0in the dense layer (atznot much larger than h) is nearly the same for ei- therη= const or η∝ρ, and is close to the standard lubrication solution Ψ = −z(h−1 2z) valid for incom- pressible Poiseuille flow in a layer of thickness hwith a free boundary. 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5h0.5151050Q FIG. 2. The function Q(h), compared with the respective function for the sharp interface Q0(h) =1 3h3(dashed line) The evolution equation of his obtained by inserting Eqs. (17), (47) in the continuity equation (7) and inte- grating it from 0 to ∞. Using the relations /integraldisplay∞ 0ρtdz=−ht/integraldisplay∞ 0ρ′ 0(z)dz=ht+O(a), /integraldisplay∞ 0(ρv)zdz= 0, we obtain ht=η−1∂x[Q(h)Px]. (48) where Q(h) =−/integraldisplay∞ 0ρ0(z−h)Ψ(z,h)dz. (49) The function Q(h), computed numerically and plotted in Fig. 2, differs only slightly from the respective function for the sharp interface Q0(h) =1 3h3whenhexceeds its minimal admissible value h0= ln(1/a). Taking into ac- count small deviations from the standard kink solution near the wall adds only a higher-order correction. 8D. Quasi-equilibrium spreading Apart from a slightly modified volumetric rate, the specific contribution of the diffuse interface to Eq. (48) is carried by the function M(h), which is dependent on the boundary conditions on the solid surface and expresses disjoining potential. It should be emphasized that this function is not given a priori but computed in the frame- work of the phase field theory (Section III D). The struc- ture of Eq. (48) is identical to that of standard equations of motion of thin liquid films, which are recovered at large hwhen the disjoining potential becomes negligible. At smallh, the disjoining potential is not singular as in the sharp-interface theories with van der Waals interactions [2]. At the same time, the viscous stress singularity at the contact line is relaxed as the latter’s location becomes indefinite. Steady flow of a liquid film under the action of disjoin- ing potential and gravity can be described by Eq. (48) rewritten in the frame moving with a speed U. We shall assume that the liquid layer thickens at x→ ∞, and assume Uto be positive when the thick layer ad- vances. Standard macroscopic arrangements fixing the asymptotic conditions at x→ ∞ are possible, e.g. h→ ∞, hx=−αfor a liquid wedge with the angle αor hx= 0, h=/radicalbig 3U/αG for an asymptotically flat film on an inclined plane. Admissible asymptotics at x→ −∞ depends on the form of the function M(h). If it is given by Eq. (34) with a >0, the layer may attain asymptotically at x→ −∞ the state of lowest energy h=h0= ln(1/a) (formally, this is possible at zero inclination α, although gravity effects are negligible in films of molecular thickness). The starting point is Eq. (48) with the effective pres- sure given by Eq. (46). Removing extra parameters by rescaling and integrating once yields h′′′(x)−(M′(h) +G)h′(x)−αG+U(h−h0) Q(h)= 0, (50) where the integration constant has been introduced al- lowing for a precursor film with the thickness h0at x→ −∞ . A more convenient form of Eq. (50) is ob- tained using as the dependent variable y=h2 x= 2Tand as the independent variable the nominal thickness h: 1 2y′′(h)−(M′(h) +G) +1√y/parenleftbiggU(h−h0) Q(h)−αG/parenrightbigg = 0. (51) Equation (51) is free from singularities which are usu- ally caused by divergences of either viscous stress, or dis- joining potential, or both, in a layer of vanishing thick- ness. It can be integrated numerically starting from the asymptotics at x→ −∞ . The asymptotics of Eq. (51)obtained by expanding near h=h0isy≍c2(h−h0)2, implying exponential decay to the “optimal” thickness h−h0∝eκx, where the constant κis a positive root of the characteristic equation κ3−M′(h0)κ+U/Q(h0) = 0. (52) Fixing, say, the value of U, one can use the shooting method to adjust the value of Gsatisfying the appropri- ate boundary condition at infinity,√y=−α. A very fine adjustment of the parameter is needed to advance to moderate values of h. An example of a computed depen- dence of the interface inclination angle on the nominal thickness of a dense layer spreading on a horizontal sup- port is shown in Fig. 3. 10 20 30 40h0.20.40.60.811.2q 0.5 0.2 FIG. 3. Dependence of the interface inclination angle θ on the nominal thickness hof a spreading dense layer for 3U= 0.5 and 3 U= 0.2 (as indicated by numbers at the respective curves). The values of Gfound by shooting are, respectively, 0.035123081 and 0.0079817. V. NON-EQUILIBRIUM MOTION A. Viscously retarded motion Equilibrium solutions with ρvarying along the zaxis exist only at a particular constant value of µ, equal to zero in the adopted gauge. Any deviation of this value sets the interface into motion; the interface shift corre- sponds to evaporation or condensation retarded by vis- cous friction. The simplest case is steady propagation of the boundary between two semi-infinite phases. The sta- tionary one-dimensional equations in the frame moving with the speed cof the steadily propagating interface are (ρv)z= 0,−ρµz+ (/hatwideηvz)z= 0 (53) wherevis the single velocity component in this frame; external forces are omitted and /hatwideη=ζ+4 3ηis the renor- malized viscosity, accounting also for the divergence term in Eq. (9). These equations are readily integrated yield- ing j≡ρv= const, µ=µc+jR(z), (54) 9where R(z) =/integraldisplay1 ρd dz/parenleftbigg /hatwideηdρ−1 dz/parenrightbigg dz. (55) The fluxjis related to the propagation velocity cas j=−c(ρl−ρv). The sign of cis chosen in such a way that it is positive when the dense (liquid) state advances. The constantµc, which may be fixed by external conditions, represents the driving force of the process. It is reasonable to assume that the disequilibrium is weak, so that both µcand the constant flux jare multi- plied by a book-keeping small parameter δwhen Eq. (54) is used in Eq. (11). The perturbed equation can be ex- panded in a usual way, and the relation between the flux jandµcis obtained from the solvability condition (31): µc=−c/integraldisplay∞ −∞ρ′ 0(z)R(z)dz. (56) The integral in the right-hand side can be interpreted as the effective friction factor. It depends on the basic density profile ρ0(z) as well as on the assumed depen- dence of the viscosity on density. If ρ0=ρc+/tildewideρrepresents a weakly perturbed critical density, R(z) =−ηcρ−3 c/tildewideρz, and the integral in Eq. (56) is proportional to surface tension. In the case of vanishing vapor density which interests us most, assuming η= const leads to a diver- gent integral. The divergence is not eliminated also when the viscosity is proportional to density. Taking, for ex- ample, /hatwideη=νρ, Eq. (55) is evaluated using the relation ρz=−ρ(1−ρ) asR(z) =−νln(ρ0(z)/ρc). The weak di- vergence on the vapor side can be eliminated by assuming a small but finite vapor density ρv. Then evaluating the solvability condition yields µc=−c/integraldisplay∞ −∞ρ′ 0(z)R(z)dz =−cν/integraldisplayρl ρvlnρ0(z) ρcdρ=−cν(1 + lnρc). (57) whereµcis the chemical potential at the location with a chosen density level ρc. The dense layer advances ( c >0) atµ >0. This causes the chemical potential to drop at at locations with lower density ahead of the propagating interface, thereby effectively slowing down the advance of the dense layer. A sharp drop in the dilute layer, leading to a divergent friction factor (56), causes substantial deviations from the zero-order density profile, which will be taken into account in the next section. B. Evaporation flux We shall consider the case ρ(∞)→0, in view of a strong viscous resistance that has lead to the divergenceof the effective viscosity in Eq. (56). Any vertical flux causes in this case a substantial change of the chemical potential in the vertical direction, as well as a substantia l distortion of the vertical structure of the density field, as will be shown below. In a one-dimensional setting, when the flux jis con- stant, the vertical structure is computed by solving simul- taneously the vertical component of the Stokes equation together with Eq. (11). We assume /hatwideη= const (which is justified for the dilute phase, where the friction is most important) and denote ǫ=/hatwideηj. Usingρas the indepen- dent variable and denoting ϕ(ρ) =ρ2 z, this equation can be rewritten as µ(ρ) =g(ρ)−1 2ϕρ. (58) This relation can be used in the second Eq. (53), yield- ing a single equation defining the density profile in the presence of evaporation or condensation. The right-hand side of this equation can be transformed by replacing vz=jdρ−1/dz=jρ−2√ϕ; an apparent change of the sign of the last term is due to the fact that ρzis negative, and has to be defined as −√ϕ. The resulting equation can be integrated once, yielding, after some algebra, ρ2d dρ/parenleftbiggϕ 2ρ−f′(ρ)/parenrightbigg +ǫ√ϕ ρ2=α. (59) The integration constant αcan be computed by ap- plying this relation deep in the dense layer where ϕ=ρ2 z vanishes. This gives α=−ρ2 lf′(ρl)≡ −p(ρl). Thus, αis identified with the reverse pressure in the bulk of the liquid phase, but is not defined numerically as yet, since one has still to compute the shift of the liquid den- sityρlfrom its standard value ρl= 1 due to a shift of the chemical potential µ. Assuming µ≪1, one can see that bothρlandαare of the same order of magnitude in the bulk of the liquid. One can also observe that, as expected, α >0 atρl<1 when the dense layer re- cedes (evaporates). Deep in the vapor phase, one should setµ= 0, so that the standard vapor density is not af- fected. Nevertheless, if the vapor density tends to zero, the boundary condition at the vapor end cannot be ap- plied in a straightforward way, since the term containing ǫin Eq. (59) is indefinite. The solution strategy can be outlined then as follows. Picking a certain value of α, we integrate Eq. (59) numerically and compute µ(ρl) using Eq. (58); then a new value of αis computed with the help of the algebraic equilibrium relations for the liquid phase, and the computation is repeated until it converges to a self-consistent solution. This procedure can be improved, keeping in mind that bothµandǫare small, though the relation between them, crucial for our theory, is still unknown. Equation (59) divided by ρ2can be formally integrated once more and rewritten in the form 101 2ϕ−ρf(ρ) +ρ/integraldisplayρ 0K(ρ′)dρ′= 0 (60) where K(ρ) =ǫρ−4/radicalbig ϕ(ρ)−αρ−2. (61) Differentiating Eq. (60) yields, in view of Eqs. (10) and (58), µ(ρ) =ρK(ρ) +/integraldisplayρ 0K(ρ′)dρ′. (62) The integral accumulates in the “boundary layer” at ρ→ 0 where both terms in Eq. (61) diverge; thus, computing ϕ(ρ) in this region is crucial. The scaling in the boundary layer is fixed by requiring all terms in Eq. (59) to be of the same order of magnitude. The small parameter ǫcan be, indeed, eliminated by setting ρ=rǫ1/3, ϕ= Φǫ2/3, α=Aǫ2/3. (63) The rescaled form of Eq. (60) applicable in the boundary layer is, in the leading order, d dr/parenleftbiggΦ r/parenrightbigg −1 +2√ Φ r4−2A r2= 0. (64) Applying the same scaling to Eq. (62), one can see, however, that the generic estimate is µ=O(ǫ1/3), which is inconsistent with the equilibrium relationships in the bulk of the liquid. This can be repaired by adjusting α in such a way that the asymptotic value of µatr→ ∞ vanishes in the leading order. This is, indeed, possible, as proved by integrating Eq. (64) numerically. The integra- tion starts at some r≪0 using the asymptotic condition Φ(r) =A2r4atr→0. A few sample curves µ(r) at different values of Aare drawn in Fig. 4; all of them ap- proach atr→ ∞ at a certain asymptotic value which has to be identified with µ(ρl). The asymptotic value van- ishes atA≈0.677. The residual O(ǫ2/3) value ofµ(ρl) satisfying the equilibrium relation µ(ρl) =α, can be ob- tained in the next order by allowing an O(ǫ) deviation of αfrom the chosen value αc≈0.677ǫ2/3. Now the solution is completely specified. The chemical potential peaks sharply in the dilute phase (Fig. 4). This is due to the constraint imposed by a constant flux in one dimension, requiring a large driving force in the transi- tional layer where a large velocity gradient is necessary to compensate the decreasing density. The asymptotics dρ/dz =−√ϕ=−αρ2corresponds to a rather slow den- sity drop-off, ρ∝z−1– a dramatic change, compared to the exponential decay in Eq. (11).5 10 15 20r0.050.10.150.20.250.30.35m e1ê3 FIG. 4. The chemical potential µas a function of the rescaled density rin the case of evaporation ( ǫ >0). The curve corresponding to A= 0.677 with the asymptotic value ofµ(r) vanishing at r→ ∞ is flanked by two curves with positive and negative values of µ(∞). The relation between the chemical potential µ(ρl) and fluxj=/hatwideη−1ǫobtained above can be reverted, identifying µ(ρl) =µcwith the constant chemical potential in the dense layer driving the mass flux j≈(0.68/hatwideη)−1µ3/2 c. In the case of a steadily propagating interface, this can be rewritten as a relation between µcand the propagation velocityc=−j; unlike Eq. (56), this relation is now nonlinear: c=−(0.677/hatwideη)−1µ3/2 c. (65) C. Condensation flux The above computation is valid only in the case of evaporation ( j >0 orc <0). A constant condensation flux (j <0) is, clearly, incompatible with vanishing va- por density. A positive value of µis required to enable condensation, i.e. advance of the dense phase. This, in turn, implies a finite vapor density, so that µ(ρv)≈ρv atρv≪1. The condensation flux strongly depends on this resid- ual density. Equation (59) is retained with the sign of ǫinverted, but, since the expression multiplying ǫis no more indefinite at z→ ∞, the integration constant αcan be directly related to ρv: ρ2d dρ/parenleftbiggϕ 2ρ−f′(ρ)/parenrightbigg +ρ2 vf′(ρv)−ǫ√ϕ ρ2= 0.(66) The appropriate rescaled variables are again given by Eq. (63), and the rescaled equation replacing Eq. (64) reads, in the leading order d dr/parenleftbiggΦ r/parenrightbigg −1−2√ Φ r4+β2 r2= 0, (67) whereβ=|ǫ|−1/3ρv. The asymptotics at z→ ∞ or r→βis 11Φ =κ2(r−β)2, κ=1 2β3/parenleftBig 1−/radicalbig 1 + 4β6/parenrightBig .(68) This asymptotics corresponds to an exponential decay of density to its equilibrium value, r−β∼eκzatz→ ∞. Integrating Eq. (67) with the asymptotic condition (68), one can see that also in this case the chemical po- tential defined by Eq. (58) reaches a constant asymptotic value atr→ ∞. Checking the asymptotics of Eq. (66) at ρ→ρl, one can see that the thermodynamic pressure on the liquid side, ρ2 lf′(ρl) should be equal that on the vapor side,ρ2 vf′(ρv), and, hence, be of O(ǫ2/3). This is again inconsistent with the generic estimate µ=O(ǫ1/3), im- plying, through the equilibrium relationships, the same order of magnitude of f′(ρl). Hence, as in the preced- ing subsection, the value of βhas to be adjusted in such a way that the asymptotic value of µatr→ ∞ van- ishes in the leading order. The value found by shooting isβ≈0.685 (see Fig. 5). 5 10 15 20r -0.20.20.40.6m e1ê3 0.69 0.68 FIG. 5. The chemical potential µas a function of the rescaled density rin the case of condensation ( ǫ <0). The curve corresponding to β= 0.685 with the asymptotic value ofµ(r) vanishing at r→ ∞ is flanked by two curves with positive and negative values of µ(∞). D. Kinetically retarded motion Taking into account “normal” viscous retardation only (with /hatwideη≈η) may exaggerate the actual phase transition rate, since transport through a sharp density gradient is in fact an activated process, except, perhaps, in an im- mediate vicinity of a critical point. When the interface is treated as a sharp discontinuity, this may be accounted for by introducing a finite evaporation rate (involving an appropriate activation energy) and a condensation “stick- ing coefficient”. Both quantities are difficult to estimate quantitatively but, in principle, they insure a finite evap- oration or condensation rate even under conditions when viscous retardation is absent. In the framework of the phase field theory, kinetic re- tardation can be accounted for by replacing the station- ary equation (2) or (11) by the respective gradient flowequation containing a large relaxation time τ. In one dimension, we have τρt=ρzz−g(ρ) +µ. (69) On the infinite axis, this equation (with µ= const) has a solution steadily propagating with a speed depen- dent onµ, and satisfying the stationary equation in the comoving frame −τcρz+ρzz−g(ρ) +µ= 0. (70) In the case of weak disequilibrium, µ=O(δ)≪1, the propagation speed c=O(δ) is easily computed, as in the preceding subsection, using the solvability condition of Eq. (70) expanded in δ: c=µ(ρl−ρv) τσ=6µ τ, (71) whereσis defined by Eq. (14) and the numerical value is given for the cubic g(ρ). Equations (56) and (71) represent two opposite limits when, respectively, either viscous or kinetic retardation is prevalent. A rough estimate for the lower bound of the relaxation time is τ∝l2/D, wherelis the thick- ness of the diffuse interface and Dis the diffusivity. The characteristic time of viscous retardation on the same length scale is τv∝l2/ν, whereν=η/ρ. For com- mon liquids, the Prandtl number Pr = ν/Dis large, and τv/τ∝D/ν≪1. Viscous retardation may be still felt at larger scales, complementing the kinetic retardation near the diffuse boundary. At Pr ≫1, the flow velocity is nearly constant throughout the transitional boundary region, and the propagation velocity defined by Eq. (71) can be viewed as the velocity of the slow drift of the inter- phase boundary due to the evaporation or condensation in the frame moving with the local velocity of the ambi- ent fluid. At fixed propagation velocity, the increments due to the viscous and kinetic retardation are additive. In the dense layer, the former is negligible at Pr ≫1, although it becomes important in the dilute phase, as we have seen in the preceding subsections. The scaling of the lubrication approximation (Section IVA) remains consistent only if the relaxation time τin Eq. (69) is of O(δ). With this scaling, the speed of the vapor-liquid interface displacement is of O(δ2), i.e. of the same order of magnitude as the vertical velocity. E. Spreading assisted by interphase transport The results of the computations that have been carried out so far in this section for an infinite fluid layer sepa- rated by a diffuse vapor-liquid interface can be applied to the spreading problem after minimal modification. In a bounded layer, the chemical potential in the liquid phase 12µcdriving the evaporation or condensation flux is de- termined by the combined action of surface tension and disjoining pressure. The disjoining potential can be com- puted with the help of the solvability condition, as in Sec- tion III D; the respective formulae remain in force, since the flux-related drop of the chemical potential occurs in the dilute phase only, and is negligible in the diffuse in- terface region, where the translational eigenfunction is localized. The basic equation of the lubrication approximation, Eq. (48), is modified in the case of non-equilibrium spreading by an added evaporation or condensation term: ∂h ∂t=j(P) +η−1∂x[Q(h)Px]. (72) The expressions for the evaporation or condensation flux j(P) and even the orders of magnitude vary depending on the physical situation under consideration, according to the calculations presented in the three preceding subsec- tions, with the effective pressure defined by Eq. (46) re- placingµc. This determines, in turn, the relative impor- tance of the two terms on the right-hand side of Eq. (72). In the case of viscously retarded motion with finite ρv, jhappens to be proportional to /hatwideηP, although the term representing the horizontal transport through the liquid phase is of order /hatwideη ∂2P/∂x2, and is negligible compared to the evaporation or condensation term in the lubri- cation limit, when the horizontal derivatives are small. In this case, flow across the isodensity levels associated with evaporation or condensation, driven by the devia- tion of the chemical potential from equilibrium, would be larger byO(δ−1) than hydrodynamic “horizontal” mo- tion. Therefore, it is likely that this does not represent the most usual situations, where evaporation is hindered by large activation energies. In the present model a way to enter consistently this activation effect is to make the evaporation flux and the horizontal transport of the same of magnitude. This is done by imposing an O(δ−1) re- laxation time τ. Although this connection between a molecular quantity τand a macroscopic length scale δ may look a bit artificial, this represents a distinguished limit where a balance between factors of different physi- cal origin is attained. The last situation that we have to consider is the one of a vapor phase of vanishingly small density when the evap- oration flux is related to the jump of chemical potential asj∝µ3/2 c. In this case, it is possible to have the evapo- ration flux and the horizontal transport of the same order of magnitude with the choice of scaling τ=O(δ−1/2). A slow density decay caused by evaporation, which might lead to a weakly (logarithmically) divergent horizontal flux, may be a disturbing factor, but this is certainly an artifact caused by a constant flux in a one-dimensional setting and not transferable to two-dimensional spread- ing. It is of interest to notice at this point that, when j is dominant, and in the absence of horizontal flux (whichwould happen far from a solid boundary), one recov- ers the classical Thomson expression for the evaporation driven by the curvature of the liquid-vapor interface. Mass transport across isodensity lines should become particularly important when the lubrication approxima- tion breaks down. This should happen near the “contact line” in the case when two alternative fluid densities near the solid wall are possible (see Section III B). If, say, the boundary densities are ρsv≪1 andρsl= 1−a, a≪1, the three-phase “contact line” can be viewed as a sharp transition between O(1) positive and negative values of the nominal thickness h, such that e−|h|≪1 on either side. This can be treated as a shock of Eq. (48) or (50). The Hugoniot condition which should ensure zero net flux through the shock is the equality of chemical poten- tials on both sides. Unfortunately, this condition cannot be formulated precisely, since the sharp-interface limit of the surface tension term is inapplicable in the shock region. Moreover, our test computations of the profile of the dense layer using Eq. (51) with different boundary conditions imposed on the “shock” at h=h0showed that the spreading velocity is very sensitive to the conditions on the shock. It remains therefore essential to solve the full system of density field and hydrodynamic equation in the shock region whenever a sharp transition between alternative surface densities is possible. The outer limit of the re- solved shock structure should be matched with the lubri- cation equations (48), (50), or (72). The transport across isodensity lines in the shock region alleviates the viscous stress singularity remaining in the lubrication model. In its turn, the latter provides a gradual transition to the sharp-interface limit at large distances. VI. SUMMARY AND PERSPECTIVES As well known, the phase field model provides a sound theoretical basis for studying equilibrium capillary phe- nomena in fluids. It allows to derive in a straightforward manner the classical formulae for the capillary pressure and for the equilibrium contact angle, contrary to for- mulations based upon the introduction of van der Waals forces diverging at short distances. We have shown that this model can be extended in a natural way to study a thoroughly dynamical spreading process. The lubrication limit, where the contact angle is small, allows to derive consistently an equation of motion for the liquid-vapor interface interacting with the solid surface. In the static limit, this equation yields back the equilibrium Young- Laplace theory. Evaporation or condensation are processes that are in- cluded in this model. The driving force for the evapora- tion or condensation is the imbalance between the pres- sure drop across the interface and its equilibrium value. Similarly, and consistently with Seppecher’s [18] results , 13an advancing or receding contact angle differing from its equilibrium value makes the contact line a source or sink for evaporation or condensation. We suggest to check experimentally this interesting phenomenon by observ- ing the accumulation of a non-volatile tracer diluted in the liquid phase that would be left by evaporation near a moving contact line. Our analysis indicates that kinetic retardation of the interphase transport is essential for a well balanced the- ory away from the critical point. The available simula- tions of the motion of a diffuse interface near a three- phase contact line [18,19], taking into account viscous retardation only and, in effect, assuming evaporation or condensation to be as easy as plain advection, may grossly overestimate the rate of interphase transport, but the latter remains essential even when its order of mag- nitude is reduced due to kinetic retardation. The present theory extends itself in a very natural way to problems like film breaking. The latter situation is in- teresting also because it should allow to approach exper- imentally thermodynamical critical points, where phase field models certainly apply, although things should be- come complicated if the solid-fluid interaction is added to the critical phenomena near a moving contact line. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work has been supported by the Israel Science Foundation and the EU TMR network “Nonlinear dy- namics and statistical physics of spatially extended sys- tems”. A part of this work was carried out during the stay of LMP at the Laboratoire de Physique Statistique de l’Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure supported by CNRS, the visit of both authors to the Instituto Pluridisciplinar, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, and the visit of YP to the Technion; hospitality of all these institutions is acknowledged. [1] E.B. Dussan V., Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 371 (1979). [2] P.G. de Gennes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827 (1985). [3] C. Huh and L.E. Scriven, J. Coll. Int. Sci. 35, 85 (1971). [4] E.B. Dussan V., J. Fluid Mech. 77, 665 (1976) [5] L.M. Hocking, J. Fluid Mech. 76, 801 (1976). [6] G.J. Merchant and J.B. Keller, Phys. Fluids A4, 477 (1992). [7] B.V. Derjaguin, N.V. Churaev and V.M. Muller, Surface Forces (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1987). [8] L.M. Hocking, Phys. Fluids A5, 793 (1993). [9] E. Ruckenstein and C.S. Dunn, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 59, 135 (1977).[10] J. Koplik, J.R. Banavar and J.F. Willemsen, Phys. Fluid s A1, 781 (1989). [11] P.A. Thompson and M.O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 766 (1989). [12] Yu.D. Shikhmurzaev, J. Fluid Mech. 334211 (1997). [13] J.D. van der Waals, Z. f. Phys. Chem. 13657 (1894); English translation J.S. Rowlinson, J. Stat. Phys. 20197 (1979). [14] J.W. Cahn and J.E. Hilliard, J. Chem. Phys. 31688 (1959). [15] J.S. Rowlinson and B. Widom, Molecular Theory of Cap- illarity , Oxford University Press, 1982. [16] D. Jasnow and J. Vi˜ nals, Phys. Fluids 8, 660 (1996). [17] D.M. Anderson, G.B. McFadden, and A.A. Wheeler, Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 30139 (1998). [18] P. Seppecher, Int. J. Engng Sci. 34977 (1996). [19] D. Jacqmin, Contact Line Dynamics of a Diffuse Fluid Interface , preprint (1998). [20] J.W. Cahn, J. Chem. Phys. 663667 (1979). [21] L.M. Pismen, Vortices in Nonlinear Fields , Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1999. 14

arXiv:physics/0005068v1 [physics.gen-ph] 25 May 2000The Theory of Fractal Time: Field Equations (the Theory of Almost Inertial Systems and Modified Lorentz T ransformations) L.Ya.Kobelev Department of Physics, Urals State University Av. Lenina, 51, Ekaterinburg 620083, Russia E-mail: leonid.kobelev@usu.ru Field equations in four order derivatives with respect to ti me and space coordinates based on modified classic relativistic energy of the fractal theory o f time and space are received. It is shown appearing of new spin characteristics and new fields with ima ginary energies . 01.30.Tt, 05.45, 64.60.A; 00.89.98.02.90.+p. I. INTRODUCTION In the theory of multifractal time [1]- [10] for the case when the fractional dimensions of time dtalmost coincide with integer value (equal unit) ( dt= 1+/summationtextβiLi(r(t),t) = 1 +ε,|ε|<<1) was shown (see [3]) that for modifying Lorentz transformations in the theory of fractal time it is necessary to change factor β=/radicalbig 1−v2/c2by factor β∗=4/radicalbig β4+ 4a2 0. Then relativistic energy has form E=mc2(1) m=β∗−1m0,β2= 1−v2 c2,v≤c (2) m=β∗−1m0/radicalbig 1 +β∗2+β2,β2=v2 c2−1,v≥c(3) p=β∗−1m0v (4) β∗=4/radicalig β4+ 4a2 0(t) (5) a0=/summationdisplay iβiF0,iv cct,/summationdisplay iF0,i=/summationdisplay i∂ ∂rLi (6) On the base of fractal theory in this paper we presented the new equations. These equations are analogies of rela- tivistic equations (scalar,vector, tensor, spinor) and va lid in the domain of arbitrary velocities including speed of light if external physical fields don’t equal zero (but so small that fractal dimensions of time is near unit). These equations in the case of absence of physical fields coin- cide with the usual relativistic equations, but give the new fields with imaginary energies (including the case of rest energies). If the external fields are not equal zero, the received equations give also a new spin characteristics.II. EQUATIONS FOR FIELDS ON THE BASE OF MODIFIED RELATIONS FOR ENERGY Let us write formulas (1)-(2) in the form (using the hy- pothesis about approximate conservation of the energy- momentum vector in the space with fractal time [3]) E2=E2 0 β∗2=p2 0c2 β∗2+E2 0 (7) We introduce now the new designation for relativistic energy and momentum similar to those that have been used in SR ( β−2=E2E−2 0,E=m0c2β−2) (see (2)). Then equation without roots has form (E2−p2c2)2 (1 + 4a2 0E4E−4 0)=E4 0 (8) E=m0β−1,p=m0vβ−1(9) The equation (8) is the base equation for describing the energy in the space with multifractal time. For Ewe receive in the absence of fields and the momentum equal zero the four solutions: E=±E0,E=±iE0. Thus, there are particles and anti-particles with real ( E=±E0) and imaginary ( E=±iE0) masses. The last are new sort of particles with imaginary masses. These parti- cles are not taxions because they exist in the domain of velocities v≥0 (including velocity v=c). For receiving equations for fields and particles we use the ordinary method replacing the energy and the momen- tum by derivatives. This method consists in changing the energy E=E0/(1−v2/c2)1/2and the momentum P=m0v/(1−v2/c2)1/2by derivatives with respect to time and space coordinates that used in quantum me- chanics: ¯h=c= 1,E β→i∂ ∂t=ˆE,Pj β→ −i∇j=ˆp, (j = 1,2,3). So we obtain ( in case v≤c) for function Φ( r,t) the integral -differential equation (ˆE2−ˆp2)2 (1 + 4a2 0ˆE4E−4 0)Φ(r,t) =E4 0Φ(r,t) (10) 1where ˆEand ˆpare differential operators and was deter- mined early. For simplifying this equation we multiply it by operator (1 + 4 a2 0)ˆE4 E4 0) (thou it may introduce non- physical solutions but it is makes the equation (10)only differential). So we obtain (22−4a2 0∂4 ∂t4)Φ(r,t) =E4 0Φ(r,t) (11) where 2is D’Alamber operator ( 2= ∆−∂2 ∂t2), ∆ is Laplasian), Φ are functions describing particles or fields. For scalar Φ equation (10) describes the scalar field in the space with fractal dimensions that originated by the presence of the external physical fields ( a0/ne}ationslash= 0 . The cor- rections in (11) to the usual D’Alamber equation are the result of modifying the Lorentz transformation. The last is consequences of fractal nature of time. For receiving the equations in which taken into account the influence of multifractal structure of time on using the derivatives and receive more correct equation it is necessary to use the generalized Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative s (GFD) [7], [1]. In that case equation (11)take the form (Ddt −,tDdt +,t−∆)2Φ(r,t) = [E4 0+ + 4a2 0(Ddt −,tDdt +,t)2]Φ(r,t) (12) where Dd +,tf(t) =/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayt af(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t−t′)d(t′)−n+1(13) Dd −,tf(t) =/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayb t(−1)nf(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t′−t)d(t′)−n+1(14) where Γ(x) is Euler’s gamma function, and aandbare some constants from [0 ,∞). In these definitions, as usu- ally,n={d}+ 1 , where {d}is the integer part of d ifd≥0 (i.e.n−1≤d < n ) andn= 0 ford <0. In this paper we don’t consider equations with fractal derivatives and restrict consideration only by calculatio n of corrections from alterations of Lorentz transformation III. EQUATIONS OF FOUR AND SECOND ORDER IN DERIVATIVES It is useful rewrite (11) in the form 22Φ(r,t) = (E4 0+ 4a2 0∂4 ∂t4)Φ(r,t) (15) Now introduce the four component unit matrix Iand the Dirac type matrices αi: (α2 i= 1,αiαj+αjαi= 0,i/ne}ationslash=j; i,j= 1,2,3,4 ). Than after usual splitting equation procedure to the equations (15) we receive[2I+ 2a0∂2 ∂t2α2]Φ =α1E2 0Φ (16) where Φ is a four element bispinor column Φ = Φ1 Φ2 Φ3 Φ4  (17) So, we have four equations for Φ 1,...Φ4(17). 2Φ1−2a0∂2 ∂t2Φ4=E2 0Φ1 (18) 2Φ2−2a0∂2 ∂t2Φ3=E2 0Φ2 (19) 2Φ3−2a0∂2 ∂t2Φ2=−E2 0Φ3 (20) 2Φ4−2a0∂2 ∂t2Φ1=−E2 0Φ4 (21) In the equations (18)-(21) the first two equations describe the particles or fields with real energies, the last two equa- tions describe the new particles or fields with imaginary energies.The energies of particles with real energies de- pends on behavior of fields with imaginary energies and vice versa. The new spin characteristics consequences of these equations. IV. EQUATIONS OF FIRST ORDER IN DERIVATIVES For receiving of first order equations in derivatives it is necessary to introduce the Dirac matrices γi(i= 0,1,2,3) and Dirac type matrices σj(j= 0,1,2,3). These matrices may be used for splitting of the left-hand side and the right-hand side of each of the equations (18)- (21). We write the function a0in the form a0=ag+ae+an=βgLg(r,t) +βeLe(r,t) + +βnLn(r,t) (22) whereLg,Le,Lnare Lagrangians density of energies for gravitational, electro-weak and strong fields. Let a module of complex function Φ iis the probability to find the particle in a moment tin a point r. In that case the square root√Φi=ψi(r,t) gives the function with characteristics: ψ∗ψhas sense of probability. Now if change in equations (18)-(21) the differential operators byEandP, translate in the right-hand side of equa- tions all members with a0and than extract a square root from left-hand side and right-hand side of these equa- tions we obtain (after splitting we change Eandpby 2ordinary differential operators and use the designations ψj(i) where indexes icorresponds to the indexes iat Φ i and indexes jcorresponds to each splitting component of Φ i iγi∂i/radicalbig Φ1=E0σ1/radicalbig Φ1+/radicalbig 2agσ2i∂4/radicalbig Φ4 (23) +√ 2aeσ3i∂4/radicalbig Φ4+√ 2anσ4i∂4/radicalbig Φ4 iγi∂i/radicalbig Φ2=E0σ1/radicalbig Φ2+/radicalbig 2agσ2i∂4/radicalbig Φ3 (24) +√2aeσ3i∂4/radicalbig Φ3+√2anσ4i∂4/radicalbig Φ3 iγi∂i/radicalbig Φ3=E0σ1/radicalbig −Φ3+/radicalbig 2agσ2i∂4/radicalbig Φ2 (25) +√2aeσ3i∂4/radicalbig Φ2+√2anσ4i∂j/radicalbig Φ2 iγi∂i/radicalbig Φ4=E0σ1/radicalbig −Φ4+/radicalbig 2agσ2i∂4/radicalbig Φ1 (26) +√ 2aeσ3i∂4/radicalbig Φ1+√ 2anσ4i∂j/radicalbig Φ1 /radicalbig Φj= ψ1(j) ψ2(j) ψ3(j) ψ4(j) ,(j= 1,2,3,4) (27) The equations (23)- (26) are generalized Dirac equations based on taking into account only the modified by fractal nature of time Lorentz transformations ( and possibility of moving with speed of light as the consequences of it). The eight equations (23) and (24) describe the particles (or fields) with spin¯h 2(Φiare bispinors), real energy and new characteristics ”quasi-spin” originated by influence of the fields with imaginary energy. The last described by the equations (25) and (26). Thus there are two sorts of particles described by equations (23)-(26): with real energies and with imaginary energies. Each sort of par- ticles have own anti-particles and ”quasi-spin”. In these equations taken into account the influences of all known fields (gravitational, electro-weak, strong). V. ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS WITH A REST MASS (EQUATIONS PROCA) Let us consider the case when each of func- tions Φ iis four- vector of electro-magnetic field (Φi(0),Φi(1),Φi(2),Φi(3)) with a rest energy E0. The equations (15)take form 2Φµ(i) = [α1E2 0+ 2a0∂2 ∂t2α2]Φµ(i),(µ= 0,1,2,3) (28) So there are four sorts of electro-magnetic Proca fields: fields of Proca photons and Proca anti-photons with real and imaginary energies and different ”quasi-spins” . For a0= 0) all the equations coincide with Proca equations.VI. MAXWELL EQUATIONS If the Maxwell equations of electro-magnetic field may be considered as the equations of the Proca in the lim- its of a rest mass equal zero, in that case the new sorts of electro-magnetic fields (anti-photons fields and fields with imaginary energies) as consequences of the Proca fields appear. Let us write equations for 4-vector electro- magnetic potentials Aµ(i) ( which are consequences of equations (11) and (18)-(21)) for electro-magnetic fields where roleE2 0plays 4-vector of electric current jµ, (µ= 0,1,2,3) 2Aµ(i) = [α1jµ(i) + 2a0∂2 ∂t2α2]Aµ(i),µ= 0,1,2,3 (29) In equation (29) Aµ(i) is a 4-column with respect to i. The equations (29) are generalized Maxwell equations for photon and anti-photon fields, with usual and ”quasi” spins and coincide for a0= 0 with usual Maxwell equa- tions. The matrices α1andα2may be chosen for example as α1= 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0−1 0 0 0 0 −1 , α 2= 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 (30) The last eight equations (29) describe anti-photon fields and its energy (if electrical charges for anti-photon fields are real) may be imaginary. In these fields the role of minus-sign charges will play plus-sign charges and vice versa. There are difference between speed of photons light and anti-photons light. The speeds of photons light and anti-photons light are equal only if a0= 0. VII. CONCLUSION There are new consequences of equations based on the modified Lorentz transformations in the multifrac- tal time theory and now we stress it: a) the existence of two imaginary solutions for the rest energy ( iE0and −iE0) and thus the existence of new class of particles with imaginary mass. Because its velocities are arbitrary ( 0≤v≤ ∞they are not taxions ); b) the appearance of new ”quasi-spin” characteristics. The cause of it lays in the more high order ( four order) differential equations then usual equations and in additional splitting of square roots and taking into account the existence of external fields (a0). The physical sense and physical nature of new spin characteristics are not clear. The nature of the ad- ditional ”spins” originated by additional decompositions of square roots for equations of four order and physical sense of it needs in special investigation; ; c) all equations coincide with known physical equation if fractal dimen- sion of time is integer ( so in that sense the theory is not contradicts known physical theories). In the fractal 3theory of time the last case corresponds to vanishing of physical fields (the last originates the fractional dimen- sions of time); d) the theory use the improved classical relations for relativistic energy which take into attentio n the fractional dimensions of time and allow motions with arbitrary velocities (including velocities equal the spee d of light); e) it may be shown that the equations for case v≥csome differs at equations used in the paper but main results the theory based on them coincide qualita- tive with the results used in this paper(if use the equa- tions of this paper for case v≥c). The presented in this paper the theory based on a rel- ative motions in almost inertial systems which in turn based on the multifractal time theory [1] and gives the new describing for characteristics of moving bodies (en- ergy, momentum, mass and so on). The main results of this theory used in this paper are: a) the possibility of moving with arbitrary velocities without appearance of infinitum energy and imaginary mass; b) existence of maximum energy if v=c;c) possibility of experimental verification the main results of the theory. The theory [1]- [10] describes the Universe as an open systems (the theory of open systems see in [11]). This theory coincides with SR after transition to inertial sys- tems (if neglect by the fractional dimensions of time) or almost coincides (the differences are non-essential) for velocitiesv < c . The movement of bodies with veloc- ities that exceed the speed of light is accompanied by a series of physical effect’s which can be found by ex- periments (these effects was considered in the separate papers ( [3], [5], [9]) in more details). It is shown in these papers the necessity to receive the particles with energies ∼E01031/√ tand∂ ∂xae<∂ ∂xagfor verification of the theory.If accelerate the particles by electric fields then E0[2˜E(Mc2)−1t]−1 2<E0(/radicalbig2agt)−1). In this formula ˜E is the electric field strength, Mis the mass of electric charges originated the ˜E. It is useful to pay attention to the problem of receiving the particles with such en- ergies of the physicians of known accelerate centers. If the possibilities for organizing such works will be found, the results are useful for development of our views on the nature of an energy, the time and the space. [1] Kobelev L.Ya., What Dimensions Do the Time and Space Have: Integer or Fractional? xxx.arXiv:physics/0001035; [2] Kobelev L.Ya. Fractal Theory Time and Space , Ekaterin- burg: Konross, 1999, 136p.(in Russian); Fractal Theory Time and Space /Kobelev L.Ya.// Ural State Univ., Eka- terinburg, 1998.-158p.-Bibliogr.51Nam.-Rus.-Dep.v VIN - ITY 22.01.99,No.189-B99 (in Russian.); [3] Kobelev L.Ya., Can a Particle’s Velocity Exceeds the Speed of Light in the Empty Space? xxx.arXiv:gr- qc/0001042;[4] Multyfractality of Time and Special Theory of Relativ- ity / Kobelev L.Ya.// Ural State Univ., Ekaterinburg, 1999.-21p.-Bibliogr.14Ref.-Rus.-Dep.v VINITY 19.08.99 , No.2677-B99.01.99,(in Rus.); Kobelev L.Ya./ Dep. v VINITI. Ekaterinburg. 20.10.99.3128-B99; [5] Kobelev L.Ya.,Physical Consequences of Moving Faster than Light in Empty Space, xxx.arXiv:gr-qc /0001043 ; [6] Kobelev L.Ya.,Multifractality of Time and Space, Covar i- ant Derivatives and Gauge Invariance,xxx.arXiv:hep-th/ 0002005; [7] Kobelev L.Ya., Generalized Riemann-Liouville Frac- tional Derivatives for Multifractal Sets, xxx. arXiv:math . CA/0002008,; [8] Kobelev L.Ya., The Multifractal Time and Irreversibili ty in Dynamic Systems,xxx.arXiv:physics/0002002; [9] Kobelev L.Ya., Is it Possible to Transfer an Information with the Velocities Exceeding Speed of Light in Empty Space?,xxx.arXiv: physics/ 0002003; [10] Kobelev L.Ya., Maxwell Equation,Shroedinger Equatio n, Dirac Equation, Einstein Equation Defined on the Mul- tifractal Sets of the Time and the Space,xxx.arXiv:gr- qc/0002003 [11] Klimontovich Yu.L. Statistical Theory of Open Systems (Kluwer, Dordrecht,1995); Klimontovich Yu.L., Statistical Theory of Open Systems 2 ,(Moscow:Yanus,1999,439p)(in Russian) 4

arXiv:physics/0005069v1 [physics.gen-ph] 25 May 2000Does Special Relativity Have Limits of Applicability in the Domain of Very Large Energies? L.Ya.Kobelev Department of Physics, Urals State University Av. Lenina, 51, Ekaterinburg 620083, Russia E-mail: leonid.kobelev@usu.ru We have shown in the paper that for time with fractional dimen sions (multifractal time theory) there are small domain of velocities vnearv=cwhere SR must be replaced by fractal theory of almost inertial system that doe’s not contains an infinity and permits moving with arbitrary velocities. 01.30.Tt, 05.45, 64.60.A; 00.89.98.02.90.+p. I. INTRODUCTION The special relativity theory (SR) is one of the physics theories that are compose the base of the modern physics, it has well experimental foundation in the large area of the reached velocities and energies, is the working the- ory of a modern physics and widely use in a science and technique. Nevertheless, as any physical theory created by men, SR has a boundaries of applicability (the inertial systems of reference). As far as we know a problem of energy boundaries SR for any moving body was not ana- lyzed in detail. At the same time the tends of energy of a moving body when it’s velocity reaches the value of speed of light to infinity calls doubts in applicability SR in this area of energies, as the occurrence of infinity in the phys- ical theories always testifies about their interior deficien - cies. The purpose of the paper is presenting the theory of almost inertial systems in the space with multifractal time (I believe that time and space of our world may have multifractal characteristics) in which the motions of bod- ies with arbitrary velocities are possible and there are no energy infinity. At the same time if the energies reached by a body, as a result of it’s motion, are smaller than E0103sec1/2t−1/2(t-time of acceleration of a particle up to such energies, E0- a rest energy) all results of the the- ory coincide with results of SR and thus do not contradict experiment. The differences between our theory and SR appear only if energy of moving body exceeds the energy E0103sec1/2t−1/2. The theory is based on using, but as a good approach, of a principle of the constancy speed of light, an invariance of modified Galilean and Lorentz transformation laws. This theory is not a generalization of SR, because any SR generalizations in the domain of validity SR (inertial systems) are absurd. This theory describes relative movements only in the almost inertial systems, and thus does not contradict SR, thou coincide with it for case of inertial systems. For constructing such theory it is necessary to refuse from the rigorous realiza- tion of the SR postulates: a homogeneous of space and time, the constancy of speed of light, the Galilean rela- tivity principle. In an inhomogeneous space and time, ifthe inhomogeneous are small, the motion of bodies will be almost inertial, and velocity of light is almost sta- tionary value. This paper contains the example of the theory based on the time and the space with fractional dimensions (FD) [1] . This theory use for description of time and space characteristics the ideas of fractal geom- etry. The values FD are a little bit distinguished from the integer dimensions (the theory of multifractal time and space is given in [1]. In fractal theory the motions of particles with arbitrary velocities are permissible, th e speed of light is almost independent from the velocity of lights sources. For example, on the surface of Earth the differences of value of speed of light under change mov- ing direction vby−vconsist ∼2v/c10−6t. The theory almost coincides with SR, for velocities which are lesser than speed of light but does not includes singularities at v=c. II. MULTIFRACTAL TIME Following [1], we will consider both time and space as the initial real material fields existing in the world and generating all other physical fields. Assume that every of them consists of a continuous, but not differentiable bounded set of small elements (elementary intervals, fur- ther treated as ”points”). Consider the set of small time elements St. Let time be defined on multifractal sub- sets of such elements, defined on certain measure car- rierR\. Each element of these subsets (or ”points”) is characterized by the fractional (fractal) dimension (FD) dt(r(t), t) and for different elements FD are different. In this case the classical mathematical calculus or fractiona l (say, Riemann - Liouville) calculus [2] can not be applied to describe a small changes of a continuous function of physical values f(t), defined on time subsets St, because the fractional exponent depends on the coordinates and time. Therefore, we have to introduce integral function- als (both left-sided and right-sided) which are suitable to describe the dynamics of functions defined on multifrac- tal sets (see [1]). Actually, these functionals are simple 1and natural generalization of the Riemann-Liouville frac- tional derivatives and integrals: Dd +,tf(t) =/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayt af(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t−t′)d(t′)−n+1(1) Dd −,tf(t) = (−1)n/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayb tf(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t′−t)d(t′)−n+1 (2) where Γ( x) is Euler’s gamma function, and aandbare some constants from [0 ,∞). In these definitions, as usu- ally,n={d}+ 1 , where {d}is the integer part of dif d≥0 (i.e. n−1≤d < n ) and n= 0 for d <0. If d=const, the generalized fractional derivatives (GFD) (1)-(2) coincide with the Riemann - Liouville fractional derivatives ( d≥0) or fractional integrals ( d <0). When d=n+ε(t), ε(t)→0, GFD can be represented by means of integer derivatives and integrals. For n= 1, that is, d= 1 + ε,|ε|<<1 it is possible to obtain: D1+ε +,tf(t)≈∂ ∂tf(t) +a∂ ∂t[ε(r(t), t)f(t)] (3) where ais constant and defined by the choice of the rules of regularization of integrals (1)-(2) (for more detailed s ee [1]). The selection of the rule of regularization that gives a real additives for usual derivative in (3) yield a= 0.5 ford <1 and a= 1.077 for d >1 [1]. The functions under integral sign in (1)-(2) we consider as the gener- alized functions defined on the set of the finite functions [3]. The notions of GFD, similar to (1)-(2), can also be defined and for the space variables r. The definitions of GFD (2)-(2) are formal until the connections between fractal dimensions of time dt(r(t), t) and certain characteristics of physical fields (say, poten- tials Φ i(r(t), t), i= 1,2, ..) or densities of Lagrangians Li) are determined. Following [1], we define this connec- tion by the relation dt(r(t), t) = 1 +/summationdisplay iβiLi(Φi(r(t), t)) (4) where Liare densities of energy of physical fields, βiare dimensional constants with physical dimension of [ Li]−1 (it is worth to choose β′ iin the form β′ i=a−1βifor the sake of independence from regularization constant). The definition of time as the system of subsets and definition the FD d(see 4) connects the value of fractional (fractal) dimension dt(r(t), t) with each time instant t. The latter depends both on time tand coordinates r. Ifdt= 1 (an absence of physical fields) the set of time has topological dimension equal to unity. The multifractal model of time allows, as will be shown below, to consider the divergence of energy of masses moving with speed of light in the SR theory as the result of the requirement of rigorous validity of the laws pointed out in the beginning of this paper in the presence of physical fields (in our theory there are approximate fulfillment of these laws).III. THE PRINCIPLE OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT INVARIANCE Because of the non-uniformity of time in our multi- fractal model, the speed of light, just as in the general relativity theory, depends on potentials of physical fields that define the fractal dimensions of time dt(r(t), t) (see (4)). If fractal dimension dt(r(t), t) is close enough to unity ( dt(r(t), t) = 1 + ε,|ε|<<1), the difference of the speed of light in moving (with velocity valong the xaxis) and fixed frame of reference will be small. In the systems that move with respect to each other with almost constant velocity (stationary velocities do not ex- ist in the mathematical theory based on the definitions of GFD (1) - (2)) the speed of light can not be taken as a fundamental constant. In the multifractal time the- ory the principle of the speed of light invariance can be considered only as approximate. But if εis small, it al- lows to consider a nonlinear coordinates transformations from the fixed frame to the moving frame (replacing the Galilean transformations in non-uniform time and space), as close to linear (weakly nonlinear) transformations and, thus, makes it possible to preserve the conservation laws, and all the invariant’s of the Minkowski space, as the approximate laws. Then the way of reasoning and argu- mentation accepted in SR theory (see for example, ( [4])) can also remains valid. Designating the coordinates in the moving and fixed frames of reference through x′and x, accordingly, we write down x′=α(t, x)[x−v(x, t)t(x(t), t] x=α′(t, x)[x′+v′(x′(t′), t′), t′(x′(t′), t′) (5) In (5) α/ne}ationslash=α′and the velocities v′andv(as well as t andt′) are not equal (it follows from the inhomogeneous of multifractal time). Place clocks in origins of both the frame of references and let the light signal be emitted in the moment, when the origins of the fixed and moving frames coincide in space and time at the instant t1=t= 0 and in points x′=x= 0. The propagation of light in moving and fixed frames of reference is then determined by equations x′=c′t′x=ct (6) These equations characterize the propagation of light in both of the frames of reference at every moment. Due to the time inhomogeneous c′/ne}ationslash=c, but since |ε << 1|the difference between velocities of light in the two frames of reference will be small. For this case we can neglect by the differences between α′andαand, for different frames of reference write the expressions for velocities of light (using (3) to define velocity (denote f(t) =x, dx/dt = c0)). Thus we obtain c=D1+ε +,tx=c0(1−ε)−dε dtx (7) c′=D1+ε′ +,tx′=c0(1−ε)−dε dtx′(8) 2c1=c0(1−ε)−dε dtx′(9) c′ 1=c0(1−ε)−dε dtx (10) The equalities (9) and (10) appear in our model of mul- tifractal time as the result of the statement, that in this model all the frames of reference are absolute frames of reference (because of the real nature of the time field) and the speed of light depends on the state of frames: if the frame of reference is a moving or a fixed one, if the object under consideration in this frame moves or not. This dependence disappears only when ε= 0. Be- fore substitution the relations (5) in the equalities (7) - (10) (with α′≈α) it is necessary to find out how dε/dt depends on α. Using for this purpose equation (4) we obtain: dε dt=dε drv≈ −/summationdisplay iβi(Fiv+∂Li ∂t) (11) where Fi=dLi dr. As the forces for moving frames of reference are proportional to αwe get (for the case when there is no explicit dependence of Lion time) dε dt≈ −/summationdisplay iβiF0ivα (12) where F0iare the corresponding forces at zero veloc- ity. Multiplying (7) - (10) on the corresponding times t, t′, t1, t′ 1yields the following expressions c′t′=c0t/bracketleftbigg 1 +v/summationtext iβiF0i c0α2ct(1−v c)/bracketrightbigg (13) ct=c0t′/bracketleftbigg 1 +v/summationtext iβiF0i c0α2ct(1−v c)/bracketrightbigg (14) c′ 1t′ 1=c0t1/bracketleftbigg 1−v/summationtext iβiF0i c0α2ct(1−v c)/bracketrightbigg (15) c1t1=c0t′ 1/bracketleftbigg 1−v/summationtext iβiF0i c0α2ct(1−v c)/bracketrightbigg (16) Since in our model the motion and frames of reference are absolute, the times t1andt′ 1correspond to the cases, when the moving and fixed frames of reference exchange their roles - the moving one becomes fixed and vice versa. These times coincide only when ε= 0. The times in square brackets, as well as the velocities, are taken to equal, because the terms containing them are small as compared to unity. The principle of invariance of the velocity of light for transition between the moving and fixed frames of reference in multifractal time model is approximate (though quite natural, because the framesof reference are absolute frames of reference). Taking into account (5), the relations (13) - (16) take the forms c′t′=cαt(1−v c), c′ 1t′ 1=cαt1(1−v c) (17) ct=cαt′(1 +v c), c1t1=cαt′(1 +v c) (18) Once again we note, that the four equations for c′ 1t′ 1and c1t1, instead of the two equations in special relativity, ap- pear as the consequences of the absolute character of the motion and frames of reference in the model of multifrac- tal time. In the right-hand side of (17) - (18) the depen- dence of velocity of light on fractal dimensions of time is not taken into account (just as in the equations (13) - (16)). Actually, this dependence leads to pretty unwieldy expressions. But if we retain only the terms that de- pend on β=/radicalbig |1−v2/c2|ora0and neglect non-essential terms containing the products βα0, utilizing (13) - (16) after the multiplication of the four equalities (17) - (18), we receive the following equation for α(it satisfies to all four equations): 4a4 0β4α8−4a2 0α4+ 1 = β4α4+ 4a4 0β4α8(19) where β=/radicalBigg/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1−v2 c2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(20) a0=/summationdisplay iβiF0iv cct (21) From (19) follows α1≡β−1 ∗=1 4/radicalbig β4+ 4a2 0(22) The solutions α2,3,4are given by α2=−α1, α3,4=±iα. Applicability of above obtained results is restricted by requirement |ε| ≪1 IV. LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS OF LENGTH AND TIME IN MULTIFRACTAL TIME MODEL The Lorentz transformations, as well as transforma- tions of coordinate frames of reference, in the multifracta l model of time are nonlinear due to the dependence of the fractional dimensions of time dt(r, t) on coordinates and time. Since the nonlinear corrections to Lorentz trans- formation rules are very small for ε≪1, we shall take into account only the corrections that eliminate the sin- gularity at the velocity v=c. It yields in the replace- ment of the factor β−1in Lorentz transformations by the modified factor α= 1/β∗given by (22). The Lorentz 3transformation rules (for the motion along the xaxis) take the form x′=1 β∗(x−vt), t′1 β∗(t−xv c2) (23) In the equations (22) and (23) the velocities vandc weakly depend on xandtand their contribution to the singular terms are small. Hence, we can neglect by this dependence. The transformations from fixed system to moving system are almost orthogonal (for ε≪1 ), and the squares of almost four-dimensional the energy- momentum vectors of Minkowski space vary under the coordinates transformations very slightly (i.e. they are almost invariant). Then it is possible to neglect the cor- rection terms of order about O(ε,˙ε), which, for not equal to infinity variables, are very small too. From (22) - (23) the possibility of arbitrary velocity motion of bod- ies with nonzero rest mass follows. With the corrections of to order O(ε,˙ε) in nonsingular terms being neglected, the momentum and energy of a body with a nonzero rest mass in the frame of reference moving along the xaxis (E0=m0c2) equal to p=1 β∗m0v=m0v 4/radicalbig β4+ 4a2 0, E=E0/radicalBigg v2c−2 /radicalbig β4+ 4a2 0+ 1 (24) The energy of such a body reaches its maximal value at v=cand is equal then Ev=c≈E0/√2α0. When v→ ∞ the energy is finite an tends to E0√ 2. For v≤cthe total energy of a body is represented by the expression E∼=E0 4/radicalbig β4+ 4a2 0=mc2, m=m0 β∗(25) Forv≥c, total energy, defined by (24), is given by m=β∗−1m0/radicalbigg 1 +β∗2+/radicalBig β∗4−4a2 0 (26) If we take into account only the gravitational field of Earth (here, as in ( [5]),the gravitational field is a real field) and neglect by the influences of all the other fields), the parameter a0(t) can be estimated as a0=r0R−3xEct, where r0is the gravitational radius of Earth, ris the distance from the Earth’s surface to its center ( ε= 0.5βgΦg, βg= 2c−2, xE∼r0, v=c). For energy max- imum we get Emax∼E0·103t−0.5sec−0.5. If we take into account only the constant electric field with electric strange Ethen parameter a0has the value: a0=eE Mc2ct where Mc2is the rest energy of charges originated the strange Eandtis the time of acceleration of particle. Contraction of lengths and the retardation of time in moving frames of reference in the model of multifractal time are also have several peculiarities. Let landtbe the length and time interval in a fixed frame of reference. In a moving framel′=β∗l, t′=β∗t (27) Thus, there exist the maximal contraction of length when the body’s velocity equals the speed of light, but length is not equal to zero. With the further increasing of velocity (if it is possible to fulfill some requirements for a motion in this region with constant velocity without radiating), the length of a body begins to grow and at infinitely large velocity is also infinite. The retardation of time, from the point of view of the observer in the fixed system (maximal retardation equals to t′=t√2a0) is replaced, with the further increase of velocity over the speed of light, by acceleration of a flow of time ( t→0 when v→ ∞). The rule for velocities transformation keeps its form, butβis replaced by β∗ ux=u′ x+v 1 +u′xv c2, uy=u′ yβ∗ 1 +u′yv c2, uz=u′ zβ∗ 1 +u′zv c2(28) Since there is no law that prohibits velocities greater than that of light, the velocities in (28) can also exceed the speed of light. The electrodynamics of moving media in the model of multifractal time can be obtained, in most cases, by the substitution β→β∗. V. NEWTON EQUATION FOR RELATIVISTIC PARTICLE The Newton relativistic equation for particle with ve- locities v≤chas form ∂ ∂t(mv) =∂ ∂t m0v 4/radicalBig (1−v2 c2)2+ 4a2 0 =eE (29) Forv≥cthe mass min equation (29) is determined by (26). If E=const. (29) gives for v=cpossibility to find (neglecting by radiation of charge) minimum for the time t0that is necessary for receiving by particles the velocity equal c m0c/radicalBig 2eEct0 Mc2=eEt0 (30) or t0=3/radicalBigg Mc2 2E0E0 eEc(31) Thet0defined by (31) gives only an order of the value t that is necessary for receiving by particle velocity v=c . The maximum energy at v=cmay be written now as (we introduce the value α <1 for describing the radiation energy losses ) Emax=E03/radicalBigg Mc2 2E0α(32) The values of αand electric strange Eare determined by construction of accelerators and conditions of their work regimes. 4VI. CONCLUSIONS The theory of relative motions in almost inertial sys- tems based on the multifractal time theory [1] and con- structed in this paper gives in the new describing for characteristics (energy, momentum, mass and so on) of moving bodies. The main results are:a) the possibility of moving with arbitrary velocities without appearance of infinitum energy and imaginary mass; b) existence of maximum energy if v=c; c) possibility of experimen- tal verification the main results of the theory. This the- ory describes open systems (theory of open systems see in [6]). The theory coincides with SR after transition to inertial systems (if neglect by the fractional dimen- sions of time) or almost coincides (the differences are non-essential) for velocities v < c . The movement of bodies with velocities that exceed the speed of light is accompanied by a series of physical effect’s which can be found experimentally (these effects was considered in the separate papers ( [1]) in more details). It is necessary for verification of the theory to receive the particle’s with en- ergyE∼E0/radicalbig 2eE Mc2ct0where t0defined by (31). If take into account the radiation losses of energy, it will be enough to receive at the intervals of time acceleration of the particl e about one second the energies of order E∼E0103. [1] Kobelev L.Ya. Fractal Theory Time and Space , Eka- terinburg: Konross, 1999, 136p.(in Russian); Fractal Theory Time and Space /Kobelev L.Ya.// Ural State Univ., Ekaterinburg, 1998.-158p.-Bibliogr.51Nam.-Rus. - Dep.v VINITY 22.01.99,189-B99 (in Russian.); Multyfrac- tality of Time and Special Theory of Relativity / Ko- belev L.Ya.// Ural State Univ., Ekaterinburg, 1999.- 21p.-Bibliogr.14Ref.-Rus.-Dep.v VINITY 19.08.99, 2677- B99.01.99,(in Rus.); Kobelev L.Ya./ Dep. v VINITI. Ekaterinburg. 20.10.99.3128-B99; Kobelev L.Ya., What Dimensions Do the Time and Space Have: Integer or Fractional? arXiv:physics/0001035; Kobelev L.Ya., Can a Particle’s Velocity Exceeds the Speed of Light in the Empty Space? arXiv:gr-qc/0001042; Kobelev L.Ya.,Physical Consequences of Moving Faster than Light in Empty Space, arXiv:gr-qc /0001043 ;Kobelev L.Ya., Multifractality of Time and Space, Covariant Derivatives and Gauge Invariance,arXiv:hep-th/ 0002005; Kobelev L.Ya.,Generalized Riemann -Liouville Fractional Deriva- tives for Multifractal Sets, arXiv:math. CA/0002008,; Ko- belev L.Ya., The Multifractal Time and Irreversibility in Dynamic Systems, arXiv:physics/0002002; Kobelev L.Ya., Is it Possible to Transfer an Information with the Veloc- ities Exceeding Speed of Light in Empty Space?,arXiv: physics/ 0002003; Kobelev L.Ya., Maxwell Equation, Shroedinger Equation, Dirac Equation, Einstein EquationDefined on the Multi fractal Sets of the Time and the Space, arXiv:gr-qc/0002003 [2] S.G.Samko , A.A.Kilbas , O.I.Marichev, Fractional inte- grals and derivatives - theory and applications (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1993) [3] I.M.Gelfand, G.E.Shilov, Generalized functions (Aca- demic Press, New York, 1964) [4] Matveev A.N. Mechanics and theory of relativity (Higher School, Moscow, 1986)(in Russian) [5] Logunov A.A.,Mestvirichvili M.A.,Theoretical and Mat h- ematical Physics,1997, v.110, p.1-20 (in Russian) [6] Klimontovich Yu.L. Statistical theory of open systems (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995);Klimontovich Yu.L., Statistical theory of open systems 2 ,( Moscow: Yanus,1999, 439p)(in Russian) 5

arXiv:physics/0005070v1 [physics.gen-ph] 25 May 2000Is the Time a Dimension of an Alien Universe? L.Ya.Kobelev Department of Physics, Urals State University Lenina Ave., 51, Ekaterinburg 620083, Russia E-mail: leonid.kobelev@usu.ru On the base of the hypothesis about a nature of the time as a dim ension of alien Universe relation between alteration of time with coordinates∂t ∂xand time t offered:∂t ∂x=Htt. This relation is an analogy of the Habble law in the time space. The consequenc e of it is additional redshift ZDT depending on differences τof times existence of the objects with redshift that are comp ared ( t0is the time existence of more old object): ZDT=1+τ t0/radicalbig 1−(τ t0)2−1. The redshift of Arp galaxies may be explained if this relation is used and this explanation do e’s not contradict Arp hypothesis about supernova explosions. Discussion a possibilities of exper imental verification of the hypothesis is considered. 01.30.Tt, 05.45, 64.60.A; 00.89.98.02.90.+p. I. INTRODUCTION The appearance in recent years many variants of quan- tum gravity, including theories with change of signature sign, gravitational quantum tunnel transitions in the in- flation phase, different methods of quantizing and so forth (see, e.g., a review in [1]) do not allow to choose the criteria to distinguish ”right” theories from ”wrong” ones. The situation is similar to that existed in the begin- ning of our century in physics, when Lee groups theory was invented and included as a special case the Lorenz sub-group but there were no convincing reasons to single out of it the Dirac equation. Now there is no a quite clear idea on the time nature which would permit to predict the phenomena whose experimental examination in its turn would help to judge its reliability. If there is any, it would be able to significantly narrow down the choice for possible quantum gravity theories. It is one of such ”time models” that is discussed in the present paper. Treating time as a dimension of another universe with laws simi- lar to those of our world, it gives the way to a number of experimentally phenomena, some of which are discussed in the paper. II. INTERSECTING UNIVERSES HYPOTHESIS Let us consider time to be one of dimensions of a three- dimensional space of another universe which adjoins to ours and penetrate into it by this dimension (see [2]). To do this, assume that at the ”Big Bang” the quantum state of the early universe gave the birth to an ensemble of inflation formations with different values of Hubble con- stantH=˙a a(ais the scale factor of the space elements of metric). This does not contradict to the contemporary conception of the world in the inflation universe models. Then a chains of initially three-dimensional formationsalso could emerge, with one dimension penetrating into another one and thus making it four-dimensional. So, re- strict ourselves to only such formations. Stress, that this formations are primordial three-dimensional but in addi- tion there exist a ”penetration” of one dimension of an- other formation (we shall call it ”neighboring”) into it. In other words, we are interested in only the formations hav- ing total number of dimensions being equal to four: three of them are ”own” and the fourth one penetrated from another formation and is of different, generally speak- ing, origin. Thus, this fourth dimension belongs to both of the neighboring formations and is common to them. It is ”own” to one formation and ”foreign” to another. We shall refer to such formations as ”universes”. In the neighboring universe (whose the fourth dimension is) the situation would be the same. To its own three dimensions (one of which is common with the first universe consid- ered) a new ”foreign” dimension from another universe is added - either from that mentioned before or not. In the first case we have an isolated pair of universes, and in the second one have the chain of intersecting universes which can be closed and finite or open and infinite. If we are to suppose non-equal inflating of the three-dimensional vol- umes of this universes in regard to each other (because of different value a), the fourth dimension penetrated into a universe from another one can play the role of natu- ral calibrating value while comparing the volumes and be treated as ”time”. In this case the dimension of ”foreign” universe common to ours is time to us, but in the foreign universe the role of time is played by a dimension of an alien to it universe (either new one, or, probably, ours). Note, that this model does not reduce to the York theory (see [3]) or to the ”scale” theories of time. Here time is not simply a scale factor but a dimension of origin and properties different from that of our three space dimen- sions, though it plays in its own universe role exactly the same as them. All what is needed for such treatment is a difference in expanding between the three ”own” and the 1fourth ”foreign” dimensions. Therefore, from this point of view, time can be considered as a dimension of an- other formation and common to our universe but with properties different from that of our own three spatial dimensions and, hence, expanding unlike them. The con- cept of the expansion rate of the universe (as well as time and rate concepts themselves) are then defined by com- paring the laws of changing three-dimensional volumes of neighboring universes having one common (the fourth to us) dimension. The four-dimensional interval of spe- cial relativity ds2=dr2−c2dt2in this case, at ds2= 0 will yield the rate of changing of our spatial coordinates in relation to tcoordinate which characterize the alter- ation of the ”spatial” dimensions of the other universe. Light velocity cin this terms is simply the difference be- tween changing in own three-dimensional volumes of two neighboring universes. It appeared as a result of the Big Bang and can be exceeded in our space only at local but not at large scales. In the neighboring universe, provided validity after the phase of blowing a kind of special rel- ativity condition like that of our world, we shall have ds∗2=dt2−c∗2dr2, and,c∗=c−1from our point of view, in the simple case. What consequences arise from this hypothesis concerning the nature of time, based on existing of at least two such four-dimensional universes with one common dimension? III. ANOMALOUS REDSHIFT BEHAVIOR As the first consequence of the model proposed we shall discuss the red shift in the spectra of far star objects. Let the physical laws of nature be equal in the neighboring universes. Then in both of them, ours ”spatial” and the other ”temporal” the following Hubble laws can be writ- ten: dx dt=vx=Hxx (1) dt dx=vt=Htt (2) wherevxandvtare the rates of scattering of star ob- jects in the corresponding universes, HxandHtare the Hubble constants in them and xandtmean the distances between the objects in the ”spatial” and ”temporal” uni- verses. One of three dimensions making in the ”tempo- ral” universe vector tpenetrates into our universe and plays the role of time to us.We shall denote it as t, be- cause only one component of tis common. Stress, that instead of the Hubble law (1) now one should take into account in addition to it the new relation (2), that is vt=Htt (3) The physical sense of vtis the rate of time alteration per distance unit and can be bound up with the timepassed since the star object was born in our universe. The Doppler wavelength shift Z= (λ0−λe)/λe(hereλ0and λeare wavelengths in the observer’s frame of reference and in the object’s own one) then should be calculated using (3) as well as (1). Denote it as ZDTandZDX accordingly. If ZDT≪ZDXorZDT≫ZDXthen the resulting shift is simply their sum: Z=ZDX+ZDT (4) ForZDT, using (3) one easily finds ZDT=1 +vt c∗/radicalBig 1−v2 t c∗2−1 (5) wherec∗=c−1. Whenc∗=αc−1,α=const. Putting vtfrom (3) into (5) and assuming, in virtue of similarity of the nature’s laws in both of the universes, Ht=H0c−1 we obtain (for c∗=c−1) vec∗−1=Httc∗−1=H0t(c∗c)−1=t t0(6) witht0=H−1 0being the time since the universe for- mation and tis the difference between the birth time of the star objects of whose spectra redshift is investigated (i.e,t=te−t0ort=t0−tedepending on the sign of the expression). Then ZDT=1 +t t0/radicalBig 1−(t t0)2−1 (7) and Z=ZDT+ZDX≈1 +v c/radicalbig 1−(v c)2+1 +t t0/radicalBig 1−(t t0)2−2 (8) If the contributions of ZDTandZDXintoZare com- parable by value, it is not clear which way to calculate the Doppler shift in the direction to the observer is more preferable, Z=ZDX+ZDT or Z=1 +A√ 1−A2−1 (9) where A=vx c+t t0 1 +vxt ct0 The first case corresponds to independent contribution ofZDTandZDX, while (9) represents the attempt to add velocities of different origin (in different universes) in the direction to the observer (note, that velocity in the ”temporal” universe is a vector only in that universe, but not in ours). 2IV. NEW ENERGY -MOMENTUM RELATION FOR ALIEN NON-RELATIVISTIC PARTICLES? As the second example we put the following question: whether a particle (with rest mass m0) can penetrate from one universe into another (say, from ours to the neighboring or into our universe from elsewhere) and if yes, which energy it should posses? To answer it, let first write two Dirac equations for a free particle in our universe and in the other one: ∂γψ(x) = 0; (x=r,it) (10) ∂γψ(xt) = 0; (xt=t,ix) (11) whereγmeans Dirac matrices. Energy eigenvalues for the particle then E2=p2+E2 0;E2 0=m0c2(12) P2 t=E2 tc∗2+P2 0t;P0=m0c∗(13) Here the particle energy and momentum are written for our and the neighboring universes accordingly. Note, that momentum corresponds to the space derivative of wave function, that is ∂Ψ/∂rand energy corresponds to the time derivative ∂Ψ/∂t. As space and time exchange their role while turning from one universe to the other, the derivatives also will exchange their role. That is, what we usually call ”momentum” will behave like energy and vice versa. We shall keep the notations Pfor∂Ψ/∂r andEfor∂Ψ/∂tthough their sense in different universes may change and this fact is taken into account in (13). If we may admit that when a particle tunneling from one universe into another its momentum remains, then Pt=Pand (12) takes the form E2= (E2 tc∗2+P2 0t)c2+E2 0 (14) But in the neighboring universe P0t=m0c∗and in our universe momentum can be of any quantity. Therefore Etturns into relativistic energy and can not be less then E0=m0c2. Then from (14) follows an inequality for the particle energy E >2E0 (15) This condition is necessary but not sufficient, because our assumptions require that vector momentum conser- vation law must realize. Probably, the validity of this law can be achieved only for a selected direction in our space or only near massive bodies which get the remain- der energy and momentum. Nevertheless, the expres- sion (15), in principle, can be examined experimentally, since it indicates on the possibility of an apparent vi- olations of the laws of conservation of energy, charge, number of particles faster than/radicalbig 3/4c, which originates from the particles going out into another universe. Formassless particles (i.g., photons) this transition may re- duce to a frequency renormalization (a simultaneous for all the frequencies ”reddening”). Beside that, one can take into consideration a possibility for both mass and massless particles tunneling through a potential barrier of unknown nature which divided he universes since they was born. Discuss now some aspects of tunneling of quan- tum particles from one universe into another. If it is possible, no matter how small the probability of such a transition is, it seems that one can point out two observ- able consequences. The first of them is as follows. In the neighboring universe a free non-relativistic particle obe ys the equation ih∂ ∂xΨ =h2 2m0c3∂2 ∂t2Ψ (16) therefore the relation between its energy and momen- tum will differs from that for a particle in our universe. Namely, E=/radicalbig 2E0c√p (17) V. DOES INTENSITY OF RELIC RADIATION HAVE A SECOND MAXIMUM? The second consequence observable appears from the relic radiation of the neighboring universe. This radia- tion, if tunneling through the barrier between the uni- verses, can, in principle, be detected. Its frequency and wavelength can be calculated using the assumed earlier similarity of the physical laws in both of the universes. Thus, in the neighboring one the relic radiation wave- lengthsλtr(measured in seconds) will coincide numer- ically with the wavelength obtained in our universe λr. But while turning to our universe from the ”foreign” one, the wavelength must be multiplied by the light velocity c. So,λrof the foreign relic radiation came to us is ( in casec∗=c−1) λrt=λc (18) Though in (18) the wavelength is very large (it cor- responds to the frequencies of about 0,1 sec−1), at the intensity curve of relic radiation background there will be an anomaly in this (or another) region, observed as a maximum with fast decreasing low frequency border. Whether it is possible to distinguish this maximum from the galaxies heat noise? VI. IS THE REDSHIFT OF ARP GALAXIES CONSEQUENCE OF DIFFERENCES IN TIME EXISTENCE OF THEIR PARTS? Very interesting problem is interpretation of large dif- ferences in value of redshift of different parts of Arp 3galaxies [4]. All difficulties may be take of if use for explaining this the new relation (equation (7)) The hy- pothesis of Arp about explosion of supernova stars may be includes in this interpretation . The interpretation of redshift is: the different parts of Arp galaxies were borne in different times. VII. FINAL REMARKS In the frames of the model considered a number of other questions arises. Is our universe non-isotropic in relation to the direction of ”foreign” dimension penetrat- ing? Is there only a pair of universes or every dimension can penetrate into some universe or other making an infi- nite series of universes? If it is possible to send a particle into another universe in what time it will find itself when returned and so on. Apparently answering such questions can stimulate producing more complicated theories (in- cluding the proposed here as a special case) and further investigations the nature of time. In conclusion we name again the main ideas and results. 1. The model of the ”Universes” discussed treats the time as one of the dimensions of a ”neighboring” Uni- verses born together with ours and expanding by another law. The rate of expanding is calibrated by comparing the change in ”own” three-dimensional volumes of the neighboring universes. 2. If we are to assume the similarity of the physi- cal laws in different universes, then beside the Hubble law the analogous law is exist concerning to the rate of changing the time coursing in dependence on the time passed. This law allows to avoid some contradictions re- lated to redshift in spectra of a number of anomalous far galaxies (including Arp galaxies). 3. The model considered gives way to a number of statements which can in principle be examined by exper- iment. Some of the consequences are briefly discussed: existing of relic radiation come from ”foreign” universes; a possibility for non-conservation of energy, charge and number of particles with energies greater than 2 E0(be- cause of leaving into the neighboring universes); anoma- lous dependence of energy upon momentum for nun- relativistic particles of ”foreign” origin. All the results following from the model of Universe structure proposed, though it seems to be unlikely and leading to an unusual treatment of time, allow to hope for an experimental examination. Stress,the hypothesis about nature of time doe’s non contradict the hypothe- sis of multifractal nature of time and space presented by author in [5]- [13]. Some results of multifractal theory of time and space coincide with results of hypothesis con- sidered in this paper, but here was presented hypothesis that gives new look on the possible origin of time and its nature. As the last remark we once more pay attention on possibility to receive the results concerning the red-shift if simple postulate the inhomogeneity of time flows and relation∂t ∂x=Httwithout any explanations. [1] B.L.Altshuler, A.O.Barvinsky // Uspekhi Phis. Nauk, 1995, vol.166 Nam.5(in Russia); [2] Kobelev L.Ya. Redshift Yielded by Dependence of Rate of Changing of Time upon the Time Passes Since Galaxy’s birth//Ural State Univ., Ekaterinburg, 1996. Dep. v VINITI 28.10.96, No 3142-B-96 (in Russia) [3] York J.,Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 26, 1656 (1971); 28,1082 (1972); [4] Arp .C. Atlas of Special Galaxies, 1966, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., v.14, p.1 ( Added: 14-Sep-1995) ; [5] Kobelev L.Ya.What Dimensions Do the Time and Space Have:Integer or Fractional? XXX.arXiv:physics/0001035 [6] Kobelev L.Ya. Can a Particle’s Velocity Exceeds the Speed of Light in the Empty Space? XXX.arXiv:gr-qc /0001042 [7] Kobelev L.Ya. Physical Consequences of Moving Faster than Light in Empty Space XXX.arXiv:gr-qc /0001043 [8] Kobelev L.Ya.Multifractality of Time and Space, Covari - ant Derivatives and Gauge Invariance, XXX.arXiv:hep- th/0002005 [9] Kobelev L.Ya.Generalized Riemann -Liouville Fraction al Derivatives for Multifractal Sets XXX.arXiv:math.CA /0002008 [10] Kobelev L.Ya. The Multifractal Time and irreversibili ty in Dynamic Systems. XXX.arXiv:physics/0002002 [11] Kobelev L.Ya. Is it Possible to Transfer an Information with the Velocities Exceeding Speed of Light in Empty Space?XXX.arXiv:physics/ 0002003 [12] Kobelev L.Ya. Maxwell Equation, Shroedinger Equation , Dirac Equation, Einstein Equation Defined on the Mul- tifractal Sets of the Time and the Space XXX.arXiv:gr- qc/0002003 [13] Are the Laws of Thermodynamics Consequences of a Fractal Properties of Universe? physics/0003036 4

arXiv:physics/0005071v1 [physics.atom-ph] 25 May 2000Characteristics of highly excited diatomic rovibrational spectra and slow atomic collisions Bo Gao Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606 (October 30, 2013) Abstract We show that the highly excited rovibrational spectra of a di atomic molecule and the closely related slow atomic collision proc esses contain more systematics and require less parameters to characterize th an the Rydberg spectrum of an atom. In the case of a single channel, for examp le, we show that a single short-range parameter gives a complete description of slow col- lisions for practically all angular momenta, and covers an e nergy range of hundreds of millikelvins. The same parameter also describes the highly ex- cited rovibrational spectra in the threshold region, inclu ding states of different angular momenta. Sample applications and predictions of th e theory are dis- cussed, including comparisons with experiment. PACS number(s): 34.10.+x,33.20.Vq,32.80.Pj Typeset using REVT EX 1This paper examines the properties of a two-atom system in a s mall energy region around a dissociation threshold, with the region above correspond ing to slow atomic collisions, and the region below containing the highly excited rovibration al states of the corresponding diatomic molecule. We discuss a type of systematics that rel ate states of different relative angular momenta, thus greatly simplifying our understandi ng of such systems. Comparison of the theory with existing experimental data [1] also provi des the first verification of the breakdown of the large-quantum-number formulation of the c orrespondence principle [2–4]. With recent developments such as the analytic solutions of t he Schr¨ odinger equation for 1/r6and 1/r3potentials [5,6,4], our understanding of two-atom systems is already con- ceptually comparable to the quantum defect theory (QDT) of a tomic Rydberg spectra [7]. Namely, the slow atomic scattering and the rovibrational sp ectrum of a particular angular momentum can be understood in terms of the long range solutio ns and a parameter that is a slowly varying function of energy in the threshold region [ 5,8,9,6,4]. In this work, we show that a two-atom system possesses an even greater degree of sy stematics in the following sense. Unlike the QDT for atomic Rydberg spectra in which diff erent angular momentum states have different quantum defects with no general relati onships among them, a single parameter is sufficient to characterize slow atomic collisio ns for practically all angular mo- menta. The same parameter also characterizes the rovibrati onal spectra in the threshold region, including states of different angular momenta. In ot her words, in addition to the relationship between the bound spectrum and scattering, as expected from traditional QDT formulations, a two-atom system has also the unique propert y that scattering of different angular momenta are related, and so are the bound spectra of d ifferent angular momenta. While a similar idea can be implemented in a numerical fashio n [1], it becomes a much more powerful tool in the present formulation. The origin of this systematics is not difficult to understand a nd is due to a combination of the following three properties of a typical molecular sys tem. (a) Atoms are strongly repulsive at short distances. (b) Atoms are heavy compared t o electrons. (c) The atom- atom interaction at large distances behaves as 1 /rnwithn>2. 2The combination of the first two properties gives rise to the w ell-known separation of tightly bound rovibrational states into the product of two p artsψvψr, in which the vibra- tional wave function ψvis, to the lowest order, independent of rotational quantum n umbers. For rovibrational states that are highly excited, the same p roperties ensure that the radial wave function, up to a normalization constant, remain nearl y independent of the angular momentum until a distance is reached where the rotational en ergy term becomes compara- ble to the electronic and other energy terms. This character istic is uniquely molecular and does not apply to the electronic wave functions of an atom, fo r which the rotational term dominates the behavior at sufficiently small r. The implication of the third property can be understood from qualitative behaviors of the effective potential −Cn/rn+ ¯h2l(l+ 1)/(2µr2), in which the first term represents the long range interaction and the second term represents the ce ntrifugal barrier. For n>2 and l/negationslash= 0, this potential has a maximum and crosses zero at rx= [l(l+ 1)]−1/(n−2)βn,whereβn is a length scale associated with the −Cn/rninteraction as defined by βn≡(2µCn/¯h2)1/(n−2). (1) From a physical point of view, rxspecifies the location at which the rotational potential is equal to the long range interaction. For an lthat is not too large, rxis of the order of βn. Sincenis greater than two, for distances that are smaller than rx, the long range interaction quickly dominates, and correspondingly, the importance of the angular momentum quickly diminishes. Mathematically speaking, this means that for a potential that goes to zero faster than 1 /r2at large distances, a pair of linearly independent solution s exist, which, at relatively small distances, are not only independent of e nergy, but also independent of angular momentum. The combination of these characteristics leads to the follo wing important conclusion. With proper choice of long range solutions, a quantum defect theory for molecular rovibra- tional states and slow atomic collisions can be formulated i n which the short-range param- eters are not only nearly independent of energy, but also nea rly independent of the relative 3angular momentum. This conclusion is very general and power ful. Its formulation and ap- plication are illustrated here for a single channel problem with a van der Waals asymptotic interaction. The formulation for attractive 1 /r3interaction and multichannel generalizations will be presented elsewhere [10]. For a single channel with an asymptotic van der Waals interac tion (−C6/r6), the proper pair of long range solutions are ones with the behavior fc ǫlr≪β6−→(2/π)1/2(r/β6)r1/2cos/parenleftbigg1 2(r/β6)−2−π 4/parenrightbigg , (2) gc ǫlr≪β6−→ − (2/π)1/2(r/β6)r1/2sin/parenleftbigg1 2(r/β6)−2−π 4/parenrightbigg , (3) for both positive and negative energies. This pair, which ha s not only energy-independent, but also angular-momentum-independent behavior at small d istances, is related to the f0 andg0pair defined in [5] by a linear transformation. The fact that s uch a pair exist is a result of the exponent nthat characterizes the long range interaction, −Cn/rn, being greater than 2. With this choice of long range solutions, the single channel quantum defect theory is still formally the same as discussed previously [8,6,4]. In parti cular, the bound spectrum of any potential with the behavior of V(r)→ −C6/r6at large distances is still given rigorously by the crossing points between a χfunction and a short-range K matrix [8,4]: χc l(ǫs) =Kc(ǫ,l). (4) Hereǫsis a scaled bound state energy defined by ǫs=1 16ǫ (¯h2/2µ)(1/β6)2. (5) Theχcfunction, corresponding to the choice of long range solutio ns as specified by Eqs. (2) and (3), is given by χc l(ǫs) =(Yǫl/Xǫl) + tan(πν/2)(1 +Mǫl)/(1−Mǫl) 1−(Yǫl/Xǫl) tan(πν/2)(1 +Mǫl)/(1−Mǫl), (6) 4in whichMǫl=Gǫl(−ν)/Gǫl(ν), withνandGǫlbeing defined in [5]. Plots of χc lfunctions for different lare shown in Figure 1. Kcis the short range K matrix that results from the matching of the short range solution and the long range solut ion. It is given specifically by Kc(ǫ,l) =/parenleftBiggfc ǫl gc ǫl/parenrightBigg(fc ǫl′/fc ǫl)−(uǫl′/uǫl) (gc ǫl′/gc ǫl)−(uǫl′/uǫl), (7) evaluated at any radius beyond r0at which the potential has become well represented by −Cn/rn. Above the threshold, the scattering Kmatrix is given by a similar expression as derived previously [8,6,4]: Kl≡tanδl= (KcZc gg−Zc fg)(Zc ff−KcZc gf)−1, (8) with theZcmatrix being related to the Zmatrix defined in [5] by a linear transformation. The key difference between the present formulation and the pr evious one is the following. With the choice of long range solution pair as specified by Eqs . (2) and (3), and the property of the wave function discussed earlier, the parameter Kcis, under the condition of βn≫r0 [8,6,4], not only independent of energy, but also independe nt of angular momentum lin the threshold region [see Eq. (7)]. In other words, a single p arameter,Kc, can describe scattering and bound states of different angular momenta. The determination of the parameter Kcis, in principle, straightforward theoretically. It can be done, for example, by solving the radial equation at a s mall energy (include zero energy) and matching it to the proper long range solution. Ho wever, since our present knowledge about both the short range interaction and the Cncoefficients is still not suffi- ciently accurate for many systems, we focus here on the direc t experimental determination of both the Kcparameter and the Cncoefficient. In particular, we show that if the Cn coefficient that characterizes the dominant long range inter action is known accurately, the parameterKccan be obtained from the measurement of a single binding ener gy (similar to the determination of K0 ldiscussed previously [8]). If binding energies of more than one state are known, in addition to the prediction of the parameter Kc, an accurate determination of Cncan also be made, especially when the two states are closely s paced in energy. 5In Table I, the first column presents the experimental result s [1] for states of85Rb2 characterized by quantum numbers F1= 3,F2= 3,F= 6,l= 2, andT= 8 [11,12]. The results in the column labeled by Theory II represents a simpl e calculation making use of only a single experimental energy. In this calculation, the energy of the level labeled by vmax−v= 1 in Table I is first scaled according to Eqs. (5) and (1) with µ= 77392.368 a.u. and a value of C6= 4426 a.u. from the theoretical calculation of Marinescu et al. [13]. The parameterKcis determined by evaluating the χc l=2function at this scaled energy [8], which yields a value of Kc= 0.2841. The crossing points of this constant with χc l=2(ǫs) give the predictions of the other energy levels listed in this column (see Fig. 1). Note that this simple calculation already yields excellent agreement with exper iment and compares very favorably with a much more complex numerical calculation [1] listed un der Theory I in Table I. This excellent agreement shows that the parameter Kcis indeed, to a very good approximation, a constant in the energy range covered by the experiment ( ∼10 GHz). This is further confirmed by the fact that enforcing Kcto be constant leads to an even better agreement, a procedure that demonstrates a new method for the experimen tal determination of the leadingCncoefficient from a minimum of only two binding energy measurem ents. Keeping in mind that the C6value used in the first calculation is not necessarily the trueC6, it is allowed to vary in the following calculation. With mor e than one experimental binding energy available, we vary C6in such a way that the two χc’s evaluated at the two different scaled energies (they may also correspond to differ entl.) are the same, in other words, we force the parameter Kcto be a constant. The refined C6is then given by the root of the following equation χc l(ǫs1)−χc l′(ǫs2) = 0, (9) whereǫs1andǫs2are two experimental energies scaled according to Eqs. (5) a nd (1) for van der Waals interactions. The reduced masses are known with gr eat precision from atomic masses so that the only unknown on the left hand side is the C6coefficient. This procedure, when applied to the two dstates labeled in Table I by vmax−v= 1 and 2, respectively, leads to 6a revisedC6= 4533 a.u., which is in good agreement with C6= 4550±100 a.u., determined by Boesten et al. [14]. ThisC6value refines the energy scaling and leads to a revised value ofKc= 0.3106. The column in Table I labeled as Theory III gives the res ult of energy levels predicted using this set of revised parameters, and a n even better agreement with experiment is achieved. This procedure demonstrates a new m ethod for the determination of theCncoefficient from two or more values of experimental binding en ergies. It requires no knowledge of the short range interactions, nor does it req uire numerical solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equation. The closer in energy those two state s are, the better this method works. As stated earlier, the parameter Kcdescribes not only the rovibrational states of a particular relative angular momentum, but also the other an gular momentum states in the threshold region (see Fig. 1). Table II gives the prediction s of the bound spectra of85Rb2 characterized by quantum numbers F1= 3,F2= 3,F= 6,l,T=F+l, withl= 0,2,4,6, respectively [11]. They are predicted using parameters C6= 4533 a.u. and Kc= 0.3106. The fact that Kcis nearly a constant in the threshold region has also the foll owing important implications. (a) It provides an experimental ve rification of the breakdown of the large-quantum-number formulation of the corresponden ce principle, as a semiclassical theory would have predicted different results for, e.g., the spacing between scaled energies [4]. (b) Since 1 GHz corresponds to 47.99 mK, the fact that Kcis independent of energy over a range of 10 GHz below the threshold implies that the sam e constantKccan describe collisions over hundreds of millikelvins above the thresho ld (for all l’s that are not too large). (Similar conclusion can also be derived for Li [8,10 ]). All the energy and angular momentum dependences in this energy range, including shape resonances, are determined by the dominant long range interaction, in combination with th e centrifugal barrier. And they are described analytically by the solutions for the long ran ge potentials [5,6,4]. This result, along with the fact that for small energies, the scattering f or large angular momentum is nearly independent of the value of Kcand is determined entirely by the long range interaction, means also that the same parameter describes s low collisions for practically all 7angular momenta. As one implication, a single short-range p arameter (a few parameters in the case of multichannels [10]) describes not only the ultra cold region of energies, but also the region of evaporative cooling and the region of laser coolin g. In contrast, in the traditional effective range expansion, a single parameter, the scatteri ng length, gives little more than the cross section at zero energy. Figure 2 shows the partial s cattering cross sections for s,d, andgwaves predicted by the same short range parameter Kc= 0.3106 for two spin-polarized 85Rb atoms in state F1= 3,MF1= 3,F2= 3, andMF2= 3. Only a small energy range is shown here to make for easy identification of the narrow gwave shape resonance, observed previously by Boesten et al.[14]. More data on the scattering cross sections, including those for larger angular momenta and over a greater energy range, a nd the summation formulae for summing over all angular momentum states will be presented e lsewhere [10]. (c) Since the hyperfine splitting is typically of the order of 1 GHz, it mean s that the frame-transformation method for atom-atom scattering [12], when properly formul ated withKc(or theK0 l[8,6]) being the short range parameter [10], should work well in a mu ltichannel formulation that includes hyperfine structures [12,9]. In conclusion, a theory of slow atomic collisions and molecu lar rovibrational states has been formulated that takes full advantage of the intrinsic c haracteristics of a typical molec- ular system. This formulation establishes a simple relatio nship between states of different relative angular momenta and greatly reduces the number of p arameters required to describe slow atomic collisions and highly excited molecular rovibr ational spectra. Multichannel gen- eralizations do not change the key concepts in any substanti al way, and the theory can also be implemented in exact numerical calculations. As far as pa rameterization is concerned, the theory can be further extended to an even greater range of energies by, e.g., taking into account the energy and angular momentum dependences induce d by the correction terms to the dominant long range interaction [15]. Finally, the go od agreement between the the- ory and experiment provides the first experimental confirmat ion of the breakdown of the large-quantum-number formulation of the correspondence p rinciple [2–4]. I thank Anthony F. Starace and Tom Kvale for careful reading o f the manuscript and 8for helpful discussions. This work is supported by National Science Foundation under Grant No. PHY-9970791. 9REFERENCES [1] C. C. Tsai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1245 (1997). [2] J. Trost et al., J. Phys. B 31, 361 (1998). [3] C. Boisseau et al., Europhys. Lett. 41, 349 (1998). [4] B. Gao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4225 (1999). [5] B. Gao, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1728 (1998); [6] B. Gao, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2778 (1999). [7] M. J. Seaton, Rep. Prog. Phys. 46, 167 (1983); U. Fano and A.R.P. Rau, Atomic Collisions and Spectra (Academic Press, Orlando, 1986); C. H. Greene and L. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 38, 5953 (1988); F. Mies, Mol. Phys. 14, 953 (1980). [8] B. Gao, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4222 (1998). [9] J. P. Burke, Jr. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2097 (1998). [10] B. Gao, unpublished. [11] HereTrefers to the total angular momentum of the two-atom system. See [12]. [12] B. Gao, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2022 (1996). [13] M. Marinescu, H. R. Sadeghpour, and A. Dalgarno, Phys. R ev. A, 49, 982 (1994). [14] H.M.J.M. Boesten et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5194 (1996). [15] Those terms lead to only small corrections around the th reshold as their effects come in at (β8/β6)6. 10FIGURES FIG. 1. The χc lfunctions for an attractive 1 /r6interaction plotted vs ( ǫs)1/3. Solid line: l= 0; Dash line: l= 1; Dash-dotted line: l= 2 dotted line: l= 3. The bound spectra of any potential with V(r)→ −C6/r6at large distances is given by the crossing points of this same set of functions with a set of short range parameters Kc(ǫ,l). For systems that satisfy β6≫r0,Kc(ǫ,l) is approximately an l-independent constant in the threshold region, and the bound spectra of different angular momenta are given by the crossing points of χc lfunctions with a single horizontal line representing Kc=const. The solid horizontal line in this figure corresponds to Kc= 0.3106. Its crossing points with χc l, along with the energy scaling factor determined by C6= 4533 a.u. and µ= 77392 .368 a.u., give the binding energies of85Rb2presented in the last columns of Table I and Table II. FIG. 2. Partial scattering cross sections for a pair of spin- polarized85Rb atoms in state F1= 3, MF1= 3,F2= 3, and MF2= 3. β6= 162 .7 a.u. is determined with µ= 77392 .368 a.u. and C6= 4533. 11TABLES TABLE I. Comparison of energies, in GHz, of the last four boun d states of85Rb2characterized by quantum numbers F1= 3,F2= 3,F= 6,l= 2,T= 8. vmax−v ExperimentaTheory IbTheory IIcTheory IIId 0 −0.16±0.03 -0.15 -0.1513 -0.1539 1 −1.52±0.03 -1.50 -1.520 -1.520 2 −5.20±0.03 -5.16 -5.222 -5.200 3 −12.22±0.06 -12.21 -12.37 -12.30 aFrom [1]. bFrom [1]. cC6= 4426 a.u. and Kc= 0.2841. dC6= 4533 a.u. and Kc= 0.3106. TABLE II. Bound state energies (in GHz) of85Rb2with quantum numbers F1= 3,F2= 3,F= 6,l,T=F+lwithl= 0,2,4,6, respectively. They are predicted using C6= 4533 a.u. and Kc= 0.3106. l= 0 l= 2 l= 4 l= 6 -0.2341 -0.1539 -1.678 -1.520 -1.161 -0.6244 -5.434 -5.200 -4.659 -3.826 -12.61 -12.30 -11.58 -10.46 -24.30 -23.91 -23.01 -21.61 12-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 ( εs )1/3-8-6-4-202468χc l Figure 10 1 2 3 Energy ( mK )0.00.20.40.60.81.0Partial Cross Section ( πβ62 ) s wave d wave g wave Figure 2

arXiv:physics/0005072v1 [physics.ao-ph] 26 May 2000Low cloud properties influenced by cosmic rays Nigel D. Marsh and Henrik Svensmark1 1Danish Space Research Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark (Dated: February 9, 2014) Abstract The influence of solar variability on climate is currently un certain. Recent observations have indicated a possible mechanism via the influence of solar mod ulated cosmic rays on global cloud cover. Here we show that the influence of solar variability is strongest in low clouds ( ≤3km). These are liquid water clouds which points to a microphysica l mechanism involving enhanced aerosol formation. If confirmed it suggests that the average state of the Heliosphere is important for climate on Earth. The estimated response in low clouds du e to a doubling of solar activity is a 1.4 Wm−2warming. 1I. INTRODUCTION The recent discovery that total cloud cover and solar modula ted galactic cosmic ray flux (GCR) are correlated [1, 2] suggests that solar variabil ity may be linked to climate variability through a chain involving the solar wind, GCR an d clouds. The solar wind is a continuous flow of energetic charged particles (mainly prot ons and electrons with energies ∼KeV) which are released from the sun as a plasma carrying a fing erprint of the solar magnetic field throughout inter-planetary space. Influence s from the solar wind are felt at distances well beyond Neptune, possibly up to 200 AU from the sun. This region of space is known as the Heliosphere. GCR consists of very energetic p articles (mainly protons and He nuclei with typical energies 1 - 20GeV) that originate fro m stellar processes within our galaxy. Their flux through the solar system is modulated by th e shielding effects of the solar wind whose strength is dependent on the level of solar a ctivity. Those incident at the Earth are additionally modulated by the geomagnetic field [3 , 4] with cut-off rigidities of 15 - 0.1GeV/c from equator to geomagnetic poles. The implica tion from the observed total cloud cover - GCR correlation is that climate on Earth could b e influenced by the average state of the Heliosphere (Heliospheric Climate). Solar forcing of the Earths climate can be classified into dir ect and indirect processes. The simplest direct mechanism is through variations in solar ra diative output which is known to vary by 0.1% over the last solar cycle, this corresponds to a change of 0.3 W/m2at the top of the Earths atmosphere. It is currently believed th at this effect is too small to have had a dominant influence on surface climate, although va riations in solar irradiance may have been larger back in time [5]. Indirect effects includ e solar induced changes in atmospheric transparency influencing the radiative budget of the planet [1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9]. One possibility is that changes in the solar output of ultra v iolet (UV) radiation affects temperatures in the stratosphere through absorption by ozo ne, which has the potential to influence the large-scale dynamics of the troposphere [10, 1 1, 12]. The observed GCR-cloud correlation introduces another qui te different solar influence with the suggestion that atmospheric ionisation produced b y GCR [1, 2] affects cloud mi- crophysical properties. GCR is the dominant source of atmos pheric ionisation at altitudes 1-35km over the land and 0-35km over the oceans, which are reg ions of the atmosphere in which clouds form. Clouds are of considerable importance fo r the Earth’s radiation budget, 2although their exact role is currently uncertain. Their infl uence on the vertically integrated radiative properties of the atmosphere result from cooling through reflection of incoming short wave radiation, and heating through trapping of outgo ing long wave radiation. The net radiative impact of a particular cloud is mainly depende nt upon its height above the surface and its optical thickness. High optically thin clou ds tend to heat while low optically thick clouds tend to cool [13]. The current climatic estimat e for the net forcing of the global cloud cover is ∼27.7 W/m2cooling [13, 14, 15]. Thus a significant solar influence on glo bal cloud properties is potentially important for the Earths ra diation budget [1, 2, 7]. However, the spatial properties of cloud formation vary considerabl y. For example, the physics of high ice clouds is quite different to that for low liquid cloud s [16] thus atmospheric ionisa- tion need not influence all cloud types. To understand both th e physical mechanism and the radiative impact of GCR modulated clouds it is important to understand which cloud types are affected by atmospheric ionisation. Presented her e is satellite evidence revealing that both low cloud cover and inferred low cloud top temperat ures are varying with solar activity. II. ISCCP D2 MONTHLY CLOUD OBSERVATIONS State of the art satellite observations of cloud properties are available as monthly averages from the International Satellite Cloud Climate Project (IS CCP) D2 analysis derived from the Top Of Atmosphere (TOA) radiance for the period July 1983 to September 1994 [17, 18, 19, 20]. Infrared (IR) measurements are preferred due to the ir superior spatial and temporal homogeneity over visual observations that can only be detec ted during daylight. cloud cover is obtained from an algorithm using the TOA IR statistics to i dentify the cloudiness on an equal area grid (280km x 280km). Cloud top temperatures (CT) and pressures (CP) are obtained from an ISCCP IR model constrained by water vapour a nd vertical temperature profiles retrieved from the TIROS Observed Vertical Sounder (TOVS) [20]. CT and CP are found by assuming an opaque cloud, i.e. emissivity ǫ= 1, and adjusting the clouds pressure level (effectively cloud height) in the model until the recon structed outgoing IR flux at TOA matches that observed. Based on retrieved CP, clouds are div ided into Low >680hPa (<3.2km), Middle = 680 −440hPa(3.2−6.5km), and High <440hPa(>6.5km). Figure 1 indicates that while the low cloud cover clearly co- varies with GCR over the 3whole period, the middle and high clouds do not. The spatial d istribution of this low cloud cover correlation is shown in figure 2a. A 14.2 % area of t he Earth displays a highly significant correlation with GCR - see figure caption. FIG. 1: Monthly mean values for global anomalies of a) high ( <440hPa), b) middle (440 −680hPa), and c) low ( >680hPa) cloud frequencies (blue) with GCR observed by the Climax ne utron monitor (red, normalised to May 1965). The anomalies are first calcul ated on an equal area grid by subtracting the corresponding time mean for each individua l month before averaging over the globe. The global average of the annual cycle over this perio d for high, middle and low IR detected clouds is 13.5%, 19.9%, and 28.0% respectively. The agreement between 12 month running means of GCR and low cl oud cover is extremely good, r=0.86. However, at these time scales GCR ionisation i s not the only mechanism affecting low clouds, there are of course many other decadal p rocesses in the climate system which are important. The small differences in leads and lags a re close to the satellites resolution and one should not expect a perfect correlation. What is surprising is that despite 4these limitations a signal of solar variability in low cloud cover is dominant at time-scales longer than 1 year. Svensmark 1998 argued that there is a bett er agreement with GCR rather than solar irradiance for total cloud cover. This is a lso true for the low cloud cover in figure 1c, which suggests that low cloud cover is respondin g to cosmic ray ionisation in the atmosphere rather than direct changes in solar irradian ce. Currently satellites cannot detect multi-layer cloud, thu s high and middle clouds can obscure clouds below. From this point of view low clouds cont ain the least contaminated signal giving greater confidence to this result. However, if a cloud is transmissive ( ǫ <1) then the satellite observes both radiation from below the cl oud and radiation from the cloud itself. Since ISCCP defines all clouds to be opaque, the CT of transmissive clouds is overestimated such that their altitude appears lower in the IR model than in reality. For the case of transmissive clouds CT represents a weighted ave rage based on emissivity of the clouds present in a column scene. However, the long term tren d in low clouds is not explained by an artifact due to mixing with clouds from above since ther e is no anti-correlated signal in Middle and High clouds (figure 1a and b). But low clouds coul d be contaminated with overlaying very thin undetected transmissive cloud, e.g., high thin cirrus, and the signal of solar variability could be due to undetected high cloud. Thi s is perhaps more intuitive since GCR atmopsheric ionisation is greater at higher altitudes a nd, stratospheric heating due to UV possesses a strong solar signal [21, 22]. However, it will be shown that this is not the case. Although the ISCCP analysis poorly detects high very thin cl oud, a comparison with HIRS (High resolution Infrared Radiation Sounder) measure ments suggests that ISCCP captures the general trends of high thin cloud [23]. If a sola r signal does exist in high cloud, for whatever reason, one would expect to see a signal in those high clouds that are detected by ISCCP, figure 1a. However, no such signal is observed, thus there are good reasons to believe that the long term trends in low cloud cover are due to real low clouds responding to GCR. The low cloud top temperature parameter also correlates wit h GCR over large regions of the Earth. Figure 2b reveals a band of significantly high co rrelation centered around the tropics, while there are no significant correlations for mid dle and high cloud top tempera- tures (not shown). The ISCCP IR statistics cannot easily dis tinguish very low cloud top temperatures, which are relatively warm, from surface temp eratures. Thus the modelled 5FIG. 2: Global correlation maps of GCR with anomalies of a) Lo w IR cloud cover, and b) Low IR cloud top temperature (CT). The low IR cloud frequencies are calculated as in figure 1c, while the low cloud CT are obtained from the ISCCP IR model. White pixel s indicate regions with either no data or an incomplete monthly time series. The correlatio n coefficients are calculated from the 12 month running mean at each grid point. Regions of the Earth with a correlation coefficient ≥0.6 are a) 14.2%, and b) 29.6%. The probability, p, of obtaini ng these areas of Earth with a correlation coefficient ≥0.6 from a random signal is p <0.1%. The random signals were generated by scrambling the phases of each cloud field’s fourier transf ormed temporal variations, and allowing for their respective spatial correlations. Thus in the abov e correlation maps the total area of Earth with coefficients ≥0.6 is significant at better than the 99.9% level. surface temperatures, ST, will be contaminated with temper atures from very low cloud. It is interesting to note that ST contains a very similar GCR cor relation map (not shown) as that for low cloud CT in figure 2b. The lack of correlation at hi gh latitudes in figure 2b is currently not understood. III. THE POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF CLOUD MICROPHYSICS. The opaque cloud assumption in the ISCCP IR model excludes mi cro-physical properties and so constrains cloud variability to appear only in cloud ’ model height’, thus introducing 6an element of artificial variability into CT. Observed prope rties of low level maritime clouds suggests that they are not opaque [24]. Relaxing the opaque a ssumption allows for cloud variability to additionally manifest itself through chang es in cloud optical depth, i.e., ǫ <1. Cloud optical depth depends on processes affecting the cloud drop size distribution, and cloud thickness. Since all atmospheric liquid water drople ts form on cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), the drop size distribution depends on the dens ity of atmospheric aerosols activated as CCN, while cloud thickness is influenced by atmo spheric vertical temperature profiles. The abundance of CCN is determined by both the level of supersaturation and the number of aerosols present in the atmosphere able to act as CC N. Increases in supersat- uration, typically between 0 .1% and a few percent, activates increasingly smaller aeroso ls. A solar signal could enter low cloud properties through influ encing: atmospheric vertical temperature profiles, water vapour, or aerosol to CCN activa tion processes. In the following it is argued that the latter is a more likely explanation. Thermodynamic properties of the atmosphere where low cloud s form are affected via changes to tropospheric circulation. Studies with general circulation models have indicated that solar induced variability in the stratosphere can influ ence the the vertical circulation of the troposphere [10, 11, 12]. However, TOVS observations of the vertical profiles of water vapour and temperature demonstrate little correlation wit h GCR (not shown). This suggests that the influence of variability in solar irradiance on loca l thermodynamic properties in the atmosphere is not responsible for the observed changes in lo w cloud properties. This might not be surprising given that variability in solar irradianc e agrees poorly with changes in low cloud properties [2]. Assuming typical atmospheric water vapour saturation of up to a few percent, the abun- dance of CCN is determined through properties of the backgro und aerosol size distribu- tion (∼0.01−1.0µm). Production of aerosol can be due to many processes involvi ng: gas-particle conversion, droplet-particle conversion, i .e., evaporation of water droplets con- taining dissolved matter, and bulk particles from the surfa ce, e.g., smoke, dust, or pollen [16]. Observations of spectra in regions of low cloud format ion indicate that aerosols are produced locally. In the troposphere it has been suggested t hat ionisation contributes to the gas-particle formation of ultrafine ( <0.02µm) aerosol. Model studies indicate that this process could contribute a stable concentration of several hundred particles cm−3at sizes >0.02µm[25]. This is comparable to the total number of condensation nuclei in maritime 7air ( 100 cm−3) [16]. Observations of aerosol growth into the aged aerosol distributions gen- erating CCN have been interpreted to be influenced by the pres ence of ionisation [25, 26, 27]. Once activated, water droplets can themselves be charged, w hich increases their efficiency in capturing other droplets and aerosols [28]. These proces ses influence growth rates and lifetimes, and thus the resulting droplet distribution (of the order 10 µm) of a cloud. Thus the role of ionisation in aerosol-cloud droplet formation i s potentially important for a GCR induced mechanism affecting low cloud properties. IV. CONCLUSIONS Based on the ISCCP D2 IR cloud data there is a clear correlatio n between GCR and properties of low clouds in contrast to middle and high cloud s. Since the correlation is seen both in low cloud cover and low cloud top temperature, th e case for solar induced variability of low clouds is strengthened. Observations of atmospheric parameters from TOVS do not support a solar-cloud mechanism through troposp heric dynamics influenced by UV absorption in the stratosphere. Instead, it is argued t hat a mechanism involving solar modulated GCR is possible. It has been speculated for s ome time that ionisation is important for aerosol production and growth in the troposph ere, and recent studies in the aerosol community highlight this point. It is not unreasona ble to imagine that systematic variations in cosmic ray ionisation could affect atmospheri c aerosols acting as CCN and hence cloud properties. If such mechanisms can be confirmed t he implications for clouds and climate are far reaching, and suggests that Heliospheri c climate can influence climate on Earth. Based on observations, Lockwood et al have shown th at since 1964 the strength of the solar magnetic flux, shielding the Earth from GCR, has i ncreased by 41% while GCR has decreased by 3.7% [29]. Further, they claim that the sola r magnetic flux has more than doubled over the last century. Based on this doubling and ass uming a GCR - Low cloud mechanism exists, a crude estimate for the century trend in l ow cloud radiative forcing is a warming of 1 .4Wm−2[30]. Thus, if there is a systematic variation in low cloud pr operties caused by solar variability it could have important implica tions for the evolution of Earth’s 8climate. [1] H. Svensmark and E. Friis-Christensen, J. Atm. Sol. Terr . Phys. 59, 1225 (1997). [2] H. Svensmark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5027 (1998). [3] D. Lal and B. Peters, Cosmic ray produced radioactivity on the Earth , Encyclopedia of Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967). [4] J. Herman and R. Goldberg, Sun, Weather, and Climate , Tech. Rep. SP 426, NASA (1978). [5] J. Lean, J. Beer, and R. Bradley, Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 3195 (1992). [6] E. Ney, Nature 183, 451 (1959). [7] R. Dickinson, Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 56, 1240 (1975). [8] M. Pudovkin and S. Veretenenko, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 57, 1349 (1995). [9] B. Tinsley, J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 48, 165 (1996). [10] M. Geller and J. Alpert, J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 1197 (1980). [11] J. Haigh, Science 272, 981 (1996). [12] D. Shindell, D. Rind, N. Balabhandran, J. Lean, and P. Lo nergan, Science 284, 305 (1999). [13] D. Hartmann, in Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interactions , edited by P. V. Hobbs (Academic Press, San Diego, 1993), p. 151. [14] V. Ramanathan, R. Cess, E. Harrison, P. Minnis, B. Barks trom, E. Ahmad, and D. Hartmann, Science 243, 57 (1989). [15] P. Ardanuy, L. Stowe, A. Gruber, and M. Weiss, J. Geophys . Res.96, 18537 (1991). [16] H. Pruppacher and J. Klett, Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997). [17] R. Schiffer and W. Rossow, Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 64, 779 (1983). [18] R. Schiffer and W. Rossow, Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 66, 1498 (1985). [19] W. Rossow and R. Schiffer, Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 72, 2 (1991). [20] W. Rossow, A. Walker, D. Beuschel, and M. Roiter, International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP): Documentation of New Cloud Datasets , World Meteorological Organization, Geneva (1996). [21] K. Labitzke and H. van Loon, Ann. Geophysicae 11, 1084 (1993). [22] H. van Loon and K. Labitzke, J. Atm. Sol. Terr. Phys. 61, 53 (1999). 9[23] Y. Jin, W. Rossow, and D. Wylie, J. Clim. 9, 28502 (1999). [24] A. Heymsfield, in Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interactions , edited by P. V. Hobbs (Academic Press, San Diego, 1993), p. 97. [25] R. Turco, J.-X. Zhao, and F. Yu, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 635 (1998). [26] U. H˜ orrak, J. Salm, and H. Tammet, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 13909 (1998). [27] F. Yu and R. Turco, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27(6) , 883 (2000). [28] A. Barlow and J. Latham, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 109, 763 (1983). [29] M. Lockwood, R. Stamper, and M. Wild, Nature 399, 437 (1999). [30] N. Marsh and H. Svensmark, Cosmic Rays, Clouds and Climate (2000), in press. 10

arXiv:physics/0005073v1 [physics.comp-ph] 26 May 2000Efficient Dynamic Importance Sampling of Rare Events in One Dimension Daniel M. Zuckerman∗and Thomas B. Woolf∗† ∗Department of Physiology and†Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205 dmz@groucho.med.jhmi.edu, woolf@groucho.med.jhmi.edu (February 21, 2014) Abstract Exploiting stochastic path integral theory, we obtain by simulation sub- stantial gains in efficiency for the computation of reaction r ates in one- dimensional, bistable, overdamped stochastic systems. Us ing a well-defined measure of efficiency, we compare implementations of “Dynami c Importance Sampling” (DIMS) methods to unbiased simulation. The best D IMS algo- rithms are shown to increase efficiency by factors of approxim ately 20 for a 5kBTbarrier height and 300 for 9 kBT, compared to unbiased simulation. The gains result from close emulation of natural (unbiased), in stanton-like cross- ing events with artificially decreased “waiting times” betw een events that are corrected for in rate calculations. The artificial crossing events are generated using the closed-form solution to the most probable crossin g event described by the Onsager-Machlup action. While the best biasing metho ds require the second derivative of the potential (resulting from the Jaco bian term in the action, which is discussed at length), algorithms employin g solely the first derivative do nearly as well. We discuss the importance of on e-dimensional models to larger systems, and suggest extensions to higher- dimensional sys- tems. 1FIGURES −1.0 0.0 1.0x0510U(x) / kBT FIG. 1. The symmetric bistable potential studied in the text , Eq. (5.1), shown for a barrier height of Eb= 7kBTand length parameter l= 1. 2I. INTRODUCTION The rapid computation of the transition rate by numerical simulation for an overdamped stochastic particle confined to a one-dimensional double-w ell potential (Fig. 1) is a decep- tively simple problem, and of crucial importance to making p rogress in multi-dimensional systems. While straightforward unbiased simulation ultim ately yields the rate to any de- sired precision (e.g., [1]), it requires the simulator to en dure many times the waiting period between the rare transition events (Fig. 2a). Such unbiased simulat ion, moreover, is ut- terly impracticable for larger systems — particularly biom olecules possessing thousands of atoms, for which simulating a waiting time of 1 millisecond c ould require tens or hundreds of centuries of computer time. The well-known analytic meth ods for rate computations in simple systems [2] are also insufficient for high-dimensiona l, rough energy landscapes be- cause many barriers and metastable states of unknown geomet ry intercede along multiple unknown pathways between the two states of interest (see, e. g., [3,4]). The inadequacy of both analytic methods and straightforwar d simulation for large bio- chemical systems points directly to the need for importance sampling and related methods [5–18]. Importance sampling techniques focus computation al effort on transition events, typ- ically generating an ensemble of transition trajectories f rom which to estimate rates and/or paths. Yet despite the early successes and formal appeal of t hese methods, a quantita- tively successful computational tool for large protein sys tems with 104atoms has not been achieved. We believe the apparently trivial bistable one-d imensional system must be com- pletely understood in a simulation context before substantial progress can be expected for importance sampling in larger systems. The present paper is explicitly computational, or “simulat ional”: the sole objective is to develop efficient simulation methods for one-dimensional systems which are directly or indirectly applicable to large systems. We concern ourselv es only with the “dynamic impor- tance sampling” (DIMS) methods developed by Woolf [8] and Zu ckerman and Woolf [14], which generate ensembles of fully independent transition t rajectories. We hope and believe our results will be of practical use in other multi-dimensio nal methods, but such applica- tions are beyond the scope of this work. Rather, the “bottom- line” questions we attempt to answer are: (i) Within the DIMS framework, what are the most efficient methods for rate computation? (ii)Using a well-defined measure, how efficient are these methods c ompared to unbiased simulation? We will also discuss the maximum efficiency possible using DIM S and related methods in one-dimensional (1D) problems, as we ll as attempting to extrapolate to larger systems. Achieving efficiency for a 1D problem using dynamic importanc e sampling, as we will show, requires the appreciation of a variety of theoretical results — particularly relating to stochastic path integrals. These approaches have been us ed, for example, to address the question of the most likely crossing event (see Figs. 2b, 3) [19–27]. In the 1960s and 1970s, uniqueness and other aspects of the Onsager-Machlup formulation were discussed by a variety of workers (e.g., [28–31]). Formal properties o f stochastic functional integrals also play an important role in the present investigation. Th e review by Mortensen [32] and Gardiner’s book [33] give excellent introductions to these integrals — of which Ito’s and Strantonovich’s are the most basic types. Related function al integral approaches directly address the Smoluchowski (overdamped Fokker-Planck) equa tion for the evolution of the 3entire probability distribution [28,34,19,35,36]. Path integral formulations lead naturally to the notion of a n average path, which is critical to the present discussion — even in one dimension. W hile the geometric pathway for barrier crossing is trivial in a one-dimensional potent ial like that of Fig. 1, the “speed” (average displacement) at every position constitutes anot her dimension of the average path — and a critical one to the present discussion. Such 1D averag e paths (average speeds and distributions) were considered by Dykman, McClintock and c oworkers [37] and by Luchinsky and McClintock [38], both theoretically and experimentall y. Zuckerman and Woolf [14] considered average paths in higher dimensions, computatio nally, while the general problem of finding optimal reaction paths in multi-dimensional syst ems has a long history (e.g., [39–42,6,25]. The paper is organized as follows. We first review the basic fo rmalism for overdamped Langevin dynamics and importance sampling in Section II. Se ction III introduces pertinent path-integral results based on the Onsager-Machlup action , and argues for the presence of the Jacobian term based both on previous analytical results , as well as on new numerical data. Section IV discusses a new method for producing an effici ent, biased ensemble of trajectories, while Section V gives the actual results from the new biasing technique. Section VI addresses the relevance of the results to multidimension al problems. Finally, a summary of the results and conclusions are given in Section VII. 4II. OVERDAMPED LANGEVIN DYNAMICS AND IMPORTANCE SAMPLING This section briefly reviews the fundamental stochastic dyn amics equations and the dy- namic importance-sampling formalism for rate computation s. We consider solely stochastic dynamics governed by the overdamped Langevin equation in th e presence of Gaussian white noise. In the notation of [14], such “Brownian dynamics” are described by dx/dt=f/mγ +R(t), (2.1) where xis the configurational coordinate, tis time, f(x) =−∇U(x) is the force, mis the particle’s “mass”, γis the friction constant, and the noise term Ris taken to have zero mean and variance given according to ∝angb∇acketleftR(t)R(t′)∝angb∇acket∇ight= (2kBT/mγ )δ(t−t′), (2.2) where kBis Boltzmann’s constant and Tthe temperature. The equation (2.1) is presumed to be simulated according to the “Ito-like” (Euler) discret ization [43,44] xj+1=xj+ (fj/mγ)∆t+ ∆xR, (2.3) where the subscripts jindicate quantities evaluated at time j∆t≡tj, so that fj=f(xj), and ∆ xRis chosen from a Gaussian distribution of zero mean and varia nce σ2= 2∆tkBT/mγ . (2.4) The discretization (2.3) is considered to be Ito-like becau se the force — assumed to be constant over the interval ∆ t— is evaluated at the beginning of the interval; a Stratonovi ch- like approach would instead consider [33] fj→(fj+fj+1)/2. (2.5) It is useful to consider, in parallel, the equivalent probab ilistic description of the dynamics (2.3). In particular, the explicit single-step transition probability density described above is given by T∆t(xj+1|xj) = (2 πσ2)−1/2exp/bracketleftBig −[ (xj+1−xj)−(fj/mγ)∆t]2/2σ2/bracketrightBig . (2.6) Thus the probability density for a whole trajectory ζ= (x0, x1, x2, . . ., x n) is given by the product of the single-step densities: ˜Q(ζ) =n−1/productdisplay j=0T∆t(xj+1|xj). (2.7) Importance sampling is effected [8,14] by performing biased simulations which follow a prescription different from (2.3). Naturally, trajectorie s generated from a biased simulation are distributed not according to ˜Q, but according to some other function, D(ζ). This alternative distribution can be used to compute transition rates. One first requires the conditional probability PB(t|0;x0) to be in the final state (“B”) at time thaving started at x0att= 0, which can be written in two equivalent ways for non-vanis hingD: 5PB(tn|0;x0)≃/integraldisplay dζ˜Q(ζ)hB(xn) =/integraldisplay D(ζ)dζ˜Q(ζ) D(ζ)hB(xn), (2.8) where d ζ=/producttextn j=1dxj, andhB(x) is an indicator function which is unity for xin state B and zero otherwise. The approximation here is simply the neglec t of the discretization error. In a biased simulation, the integral is estimated by PB(tn|0;x0)≃1 M/summationdisplay ζ∈SD˜Q(ζ) D(ζ)hB(xn) (2.9) where SDis a sampling ensemble of Mtrajectories chosen according to D. Note that the function Dmust be known for the simulation to be performed, just as (2.6 ) and (2.7) are the distributions from which unbiased steps and trajectori es are sampled. Ultimately, rates are estimated by computing the slope of the linear regime in a probability vs. time plot, as in Fig. 4. 136.3 136.4 136.5 136.6 t / 1000τ0−1.5−0.50.51.5 x0 200 400 600 800 1000−1.5−0.50.51.5 x(a) (b) FIG. 2. Time scales and crossing events. An unbiased traject ory exhibits two vastly different time scales: for a substantial barrier height, the waiting t ime between events greatly exceeds the time for a single crossing event. (a) The top plot shows an unb iased trajectory of an overdamped particle in the double well of Eq. (5.1), with a barrier heigh t ofEb= 7kBT. (b) The bottom plot isolates a single crossing event from the trajectory in (a) a nd highlights the rapidity (steepness) of the crossing, including of the ascent. 6−0.8 −0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 x0.000.010.020.03Average Step at x Unbiased Crossing Events OM+Jacobian OM − No Jacobian OM+Const. − No Jacobian FIG. 3. Average step sizes from many unbiased crossing event s. Solid circles and error bars are the data from unbiased simulation following Eq. (2.3), f or the potential of Eq. (5.1), with a barrier height Eb= 7kBT. The solid line is the most probable path Eq. (3.6) based on th e Onsager-Machlup action with the Jacobian term; the dashed l ines depict the Onsager-Machlup extremal path, Eq. (3.7) with C= 0; and, the dotted lines show the Onsager-Machlup path with a non-vanishing constant — i.e., Eq. (3.7) with C=−2kBT U′′(0)/(mγ)2. Note that the error bars shown represent the standard error of the mean, which is normally a fraction of the true confidence interval, as can be gauged by the noise in the data. The turn-up of the data for x >0.6 appears to be an artifact of the procedure by which crossing e vents were extracted from the long trajectories. These data were generated using the paramete rs ∆t= 10−4τ0,γ=τ−1 0,m= 10.98, andkBT= 249 .462, largely following Refs. 8 and 14. 7III. PATH INTEGRALS AND MOST PROBABLE CROSSING EVENTS Achieving efficiency for a 1D problem using dynamic importanc e sampling requires a variety of theoretical results for stochastic path integra ls and their “instantons.” These ap- proaches have been used, for example, to address the questio n of the most probable crossing event (see Figs. 2b, 3), which can be derived in a straightfor ward way from the contin- uum Onsager-Machlup action used in the path integral formul ation [19–27]. However, there have been conflicting reports regarding the exact formulati on of this action; in particu- lar, a “Jacobian” term (with quotes used advisedly) has some times been omitted. Using previously derived analytic results as well as new numerica l evidence, we argue that the Onsager-Machlup action requires the Jacobian term — even to describe a standard Ito-like simulation. In this section, we discuss the Onsager-Machlup action and i ts optimization at somewhat greater length than is required for the computational aims o f this paper. This is because, beyond the theoretical interest in the action and the Jacobi an term, some older literature deserves a fresh look and detailed discussion. The Jacobian term, ironically, will not prove critical to obtaining efficiency. The path-integral story begins with Onsager and Machlup [45 ] and their well-known action for weighting continuum representations of overdam ped Brownian trajectories. In that formulation, a continuous trajectory — presumably intended to represent a smoothed stochastic trajectory — is weighted according to probability ∝exp/bracketleftBigg −S (kBT/mγ )/bracketrightBigg where (3.1) S=1 4/integraldisplaytf tidtL(t), and (3.2) LOM(t;x,˙x) =/bracketleftBigg ˙x−f(x) mγ/bracketrightBigg2 , (3.3) and where ˙ x= dx/dtandf(x) =−dU/dx. In their original paper [45], Onsager and Machlup applied the Euler-Lagrange equation for functiona l minimization, ∂L ∂x−d dt∂L ∂˙x= 0, (3.4) to the case of a single harmonic well. Subsequent contributions questioned the very propriety of the action (3.2). First, Stratonovich realized in 1962 [28] that if one starts from th e product of discrete-step proba- bility densities (2.7) and determines the continuum limit i n a rigorous fashion, an additional term arises in the integral representation of the action (3. 2), so that instead of (3.3), the effective Lagrangian becomes LOMJ=LOM+2kBT (mγ)2U′′(x). (3.5) This result was confirmed by Bach et al. [30]. In other words, the original description by Onsager and Machlup was incomplete for simulations perform ed according to the Ito-like 8algorithm (2.3). Note that this new term is proportional to t he curvature of the potential and dominant at the barrier top. In the mid 1970s Graham [34,19] re-derived the term as a Jacob ian resulting from chang- ing variables from the fluctuation coordinate to the configur ation coordinate — assuming a Stratonovich-like discretization (2.5). Thereafter, app arently, the term has been viewed as a Jacobian, although the propriety of that name in a simulation context is questionable since only the Ito discretization (2.3) is usable, and that result s in a constant Jacobian. Both Stratonovich and Graham indicated, importantly, that the inclusion of the “Jaco- bian term” led to a path-integral representation of the prob ability distribution consistent with the overdamped Fokker-Planck (Smoluchowski) equatio n. Graham also derived the most probable crossing event associ ated with the Jacobian- augmented action using the Euler-Lagrange equation (3.4), namely [19], /bracketleftBig ˙xOMJ c/bracketrightBig2=/bracketleftBiggf(x) mγ/bracketrightBigg2 −2kBT (mγ)2U′′(x) +C , (3.6) where Cis a constant of integration. This result is called an “insta nton” by field theorists (e.g., [46]) because it describes a rapid transition, as ill ustrated in Fig. 2. To appreciate this, note that at an inflection point ( U′′(x) = 0) the velocity of ascent is the same as for descent! Yet this feature was apparently not appreciated until later ; see below. Nevertheless, (3.6) will prove central to our goal of obtaining efficiency in simul ations. Below, we also address the computational cost associated with computing a second d erivative of the potential. It is worth noting that although the extremal path, formally , results when C <0 in (3.6) [from minimizing (3.2) with (3.5)], one cannot necessarily take the constant to be negative or even to vanish. Observe that the left-hand side of (3.6) mu st be positive. Thus, in regions of relatively large positive curvature — such as nea r a well bottom — the second term of the right-hand side could exceed the first in magnitud e, requiring C >0. While this observation appears to be immaterial to our investigation o f the simple bistable well (see Fig. 3), one could imagine the positivity of the constant hav ing physical consequences in a more complicated potential with metastable intermediate s tates. Further comments have proved of greater interest. In a serie s of papers begun in 1989 and aimed primarily at systems with colored (non-Gaussian) noise, Bray, McKane and coworkers [20–24] provided some insights pertinent to the c ase of white noise without the Jacobian term. While they included the Jacobian term formal ly, it was omitted from their most careful analysis, of the low-temperature limit. Thus, they derived essentially a special case of Graham’s result (3.6) /bracketleftBig ˙xOM c/bracketrightBig2=/bracketleftBiggf(x) mγ/bracketrightBigg2 +C, (3.7) where Cis again a constant of integration which vanishes for the mos t probable case. It also is equivalent to Graham’s result at inflection points of the potential. Bray, McKane and coworkers were apparently the first to note the crucial fa ct that the ascent described by ˙xOM c(with C= 0) was equally rapid as, and symmetric with the descent (see Fig. 2b). Furthermore, they recognized that paradoxically the extre mal trajectory ( C= 0)never occurs [23] because an infinite amount of time is required to reach (o r descend from) a parabolic barrier top! This may be seen by computing the barr ier crossing time, 9tb=/integraldisplaytf tidt=/integraldisplayxf xidx ˙xc. (3.8) This point was also realized by Elber and Shalloway [27], who suggested a temperature dependence for the integration constant of (3.7) to overcom e the difficulty. Their approach successfully distinguished optimal paths for different reg imes of the effective temperature parameter. Olender and Elber [25] also discussed the Onsage r-Machlup extremal barrier crossing, and employed a discrete version in developing an a lgorithm for steepest-descent path finding between known initial and final states. Bier et al. [26] discussed extremal crossings in the context of rate calculations for fluctuatin g barriers. Yet worries over the constant of integration in (3.7) may be u nnecessary if one believes the Jacobian term is present, as seems to be the case based on s everal lines of argument. First, as noted by Stratonovich and Graham, inclusion of the Jacobian term is consistent with the Smoluchowski equation [28,34,19,35] which, in tur n, is well known to correspond to the over-damped Langevin equation (e.g., [33]). Of cours e it is possible that the Ito- like discretization (2.3) could generate a probability dis tribution governed by a different Fokker-Planck equation. This hypothesis could be readily t ested by numerical simulation of candidate Fokker-Planck equations, but is beyond the scope of this report. Direct analytical work accounting for the subtleties of sto chastic calculus [32,33] also seems to confirm the presence of the Jacobian term [28,30,47, 48]; see too [49]. The work of Stratonovich [28] and Bach et al. [30] appear to be especially careful accounts. As noted, these reports suggest that the “Jacobian term” arises not as a Jacobian per se (which is simply a constant in the Ito case), but from carefully taking the continuum limit of the product (2.7) of probability distributions for discrete st eps generated according to an Ito- like simulation. Their claim, then, is that the Jacobian ter m is necessary to answer the question: “What continuous path integral (in the sense of or dinary, non-stochastic, path- integral calculus) properly weights continuum limits of di screte trajectories generated by Ito-like simulation?” Finally, the simulations themselves may be studied — and the y too point to the presence of the Jacobian term as shown in Fig. 3. We performed very long unbiased simulations of a particle moving according to (2.3) in a one-dimensional bis table well (Fig. 1) and “snipped out” a large number of crossing events like the one shown in Fi g. 2b. Binning the observed step sizes of the crossing events according to the xposition, Fig. 3 shows that the average step sizes closely follow the prediction (3.6) which includ es the Jacobian term. The two theoretical predictions lacking the Jacobian term — namely (3.7) with two values for C— appear far less adequate by contrast. We note that the binned distributions appear to be highly Gaussian so that the average and most probable values essentially coincide. Thus, the simulations themselves appear to argue for the presence of the Jacobian term. 100.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Time: γ t0.00000.00010.00020.0003Arrival Probability105 Unbiased Trajectories 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Time: γ t0.00000.00010.00020.0003Arrival Probability105 DIMS Trajectories FIG. 4. Evolution of end-state probability distribution. T he probability to arrive in the right well of the potential Eq. (5.1) with Eb= 9kBT, depicted in Fig. 1, is plotted against time, based on trajectories initiated at the bottom of the left well ( x=−1) at time t= 0. Both unbiased (TOP) and DIMS (BOTTOM) results are shown, with the latter us ing Eqs. (4.1) and (3.6). The rate,k, is computed as the slope of the linear regime. The DIMS compu tation (bottom) shows a dramatic improvement in efficiency, which is quantified in Fig . 5. 11IV. A HIGHLY EFFICIENT BIAS METHOD FOR DIMS CALCULATIONS The primary goal of the present work is to improve and quantif y the level of efficiency in one-dimensional rate calculations. To that end we now int roduce and evaluate a new biasing method, which is a variation on those discussed in ou r earlier work [8,14]. The method combines two essential ingredients: biased crossin g events which emulate the most probable path, together with a threshold at which the biasin g is triggered. A. Motivation Computing reaction rates by simulation requires the genera tion of an ensemble of ap- propriately weighted trajectories (or a correspondingly l ong trajectory) exhibiting many barrier-crossing events. While many sampling methods are c apable of generating a suitable ensemble of trajectories in a long period of time, it is no eas y task to rapidly generate a truly important ensemble — containing highly probable crossing events — eve n for an apparently trivial potential like a symmetric, one-dimensional doubl e well. The reason is not hard to see. In an unbiased simulation (2.3), each step is chosen fro m a Gaussian distribution cen- tered at the deterministic step in the direction of the force . Forcrossing events which climb over a barrier, a trajectory necessarily takes steps in a dir ection opposing the force. As the center of the Gaussian distribution is always downhill from the present step, the typical step in the ascent of a crossing event is in the “tail” of the Gaussian distribut ion (more or less so depending on the parameters entering into the width, σ). As the full probability for a crossing event is then a product of steps in the tail of the dis tribution, it seems clear that only small fluctuations about the most probable crossing eve nt will occur. Large fluctuations away from the most probable path will be exponentially dampe d out, as they require steps yet further out in the tail of the distribution. Our interest in the most probable path for a crossing event, t hen, is hardly surprising: to generate an “important” (albeit biased) ensemble of traj ectories, one must hew to the most probable path. This we shall do explicitly below, using the results quoted in Sec. III. But once one knows the most probable path for a single crossin g event, the DIMS method still requires the generation of such events at appropriate intervals. That is, there is an ideal distribution of waiting times between events in a biased sim ulation (cf. Fig. 2a for the unbiased case). To see the reason why a distribution of wait t imes (first passage times) is required, consider Fig. 4, which demonstrates the rate calc ulation for biased andunbiased simulation. One first calculates the probability to arrive i n the final state (the right well in Fig. 1), having started in the initial state (the left well), as a function of time. One then determines the slope of the linear regime. While an unbiased simulation of sufficient length will automatically generate data with roughly the same prec ision for all times shown along the horizontal axis in Fig. 4, a biased DIMS simulation must b e designed to do so. As discussed in [14], one essentially has to evaluate a separat e integral for each time point, so part of the goal is to spread the information gathered evenly over the necessary times. This is the motivation behind the “thresholding” detailed below . 12B. The Algorithm: Most Probable Crossings above a Threshold Specifically, trajectories are generated according to the f ollowing algorithm. Each tra- jectory is started from the minimum of the left well, x=−1, of the potential (5.1) shown in Fig. 1, and run for a fixed total amount of time exceeding the tr ansient time, tb. Pre-defining a threshold value, −1< xh<0, of the coordinate x, we perform unbiased simulation while x < x haccording to (2.3). If and when the threshold value is exceed ed (x > x h), we select steps according to xi+1=xi+ ˙xc(xi) ∆t+ ∆xR, (4.1) with ˙xcgiven by either the Jacobian-augmented result (3.6) or that without (3.7), and with ∆xRchosen from the same Gaussian distribution as in the unbiase d case. In other words, instead of using the deterministic step fi∆t/mγ as in (2.3), we use the most probable step in a crossing event to emulate unbiased crossing events. The use of a threshold a way from the well minimum ensures a sufficiently broad distribution of waiting times between the artificial crossing events, which in turn permits the acquis ition of data for the range of times necessary to compute the rate as in Fig. 4. We note, however, t hat it is no more difficult to run a single long trajectory and compute correlation functi ons to determine rates (e.g., [1]). C. Curvature-Adjusted Sampling Width Yet another refinement for the one-dimensional biasing tech niques is possible, motivated by the time-dependent width of the Gaussian noise, σj, required for the provably optimal computation of the probability density at a single point [44]. Note that the biasing methods just described always used a constant width, σj=σgiven in (2.4). In a spirit similar to Wagner’s result described in [44], one can ask the question: “What is the optimal sampling scheme to travel between two fixed points, with one intermedi ate step, on a surface with arbitrary curvature?” Answering this question is not difficu lt and suggests that the local curvature influences the optimal width. Following Wagner (see [44]), one needs to observe first that t he optimal sampling density at time t= ∆tis exactly the distribution of unbiased two-step paths which begin at x0at t= 0 and end at x2att= 2∆t. This constitutes the perfect sampling distribution because it is precisely that (tiny) subset of unbiased trajectories which end at the pre-defined value of interest, and which are distributed naturally. Using the single-step Gaussian distributions (2.6), the two-step distribution is T∆t(x2|x1)T∆t(x1|x0) =1 2πσexp/braceleftBigg −[(x2−x1)−(f1/mγ)]2+ [(x1−x0)−(f0/mγ)]2 2σ2/bracerightBigg , (4.2) where σstill represents the unbiased value and fiagain gives the force at xi. By rearranging the terms, completing the square and approximating fi≃f0−(xi−x0)U′′(x0), one finds T∆t(x2|x1)T∆t(x1|x0)≃c×exp  −/bracketleftBig x1−x0+x2 2/parenleftBig 1−α 1−α+α2/2/parenrightBig/bracketrightBig2 2/bracketleftBig σ//radicalBig 2(1−α+α2/2)/bracketrightBig2  , (4.3) 13where cis a constant independent of x1in this approximation, and the dimensionless cur- vature is α≡U′′(x0)∆t/mγ. The result (4.3) for the optimal distribution of x1values illustrates several interesting points. First, the distribution is independent of the force to first order in α. Second, while the correction to the expected mean of the distribution, ( x0+x2)/2, is second order in α, that for the width, σ, is first order — noting that the factor√ 2 is expected from the work of Wagner and actually approaches unity for a large number of time steps [44]. The optimal sampling width in fact decreases at the barrier top, where α <0, in the small ∆ tlimit (α≫α2). Thus, the distribution (4.3) motivates a further bias for sampling, namely use of the width σsamp=σ//radicalBig 1−α+α2/2 (4.4) for sampling from Gaussian distributions near the point x, where αis to be computed using U′′(x). We investigate this refinement in the next section. 14103104105106107 10−510−410−310−2Precision: σk Unbiased DIMS−Wagner DIMS − No Jacobian DIMS + Jacobian DIMS + Jacobian + CURV5 kBT 103104105106107 10−610−510−410−3Precision: σk Unbiased DIMS−Wagner DIMS − No Jacobian DIMS + Jacobian DIMS + Jacobian + CURV9 kBT 103104105106107 Number of Trajectories0.000800.000850.000900.000950.00100Rate Estimate: k Unbiased DIMS − No Jacobian 15FIG. 5. Efficiency in Rate Computations using the DIMS approac h. (TOP 2 PLOTS) The standard deviation, σk, of a set of 20 rate estimates computed by either unbiased or D IMS simula- tion is plotted against the length of each simulation. The sp ans of the horizontal arrows measure the efficiency by indicating the differences in simulation len gth required to obtain a given variance (i.e., precision). For example, when the barrier height is Eb= 9kBT, the best DIMS approaches are roughly 300 times faster in obtaining a precision given b yσk= 10−4. The “DIMS-Wagner” algorithm is from our earlier work [14]. while the other DIMS simulations use the algorithm of Eq. (4.1) and the surrounding text. For the latter, the most prob able step is chosen according to either the Jacobian-augmented formulation (3.6) or that without ( 3.7), as indicated. The label “CURV” indicates that the Gaussian sampling width was modified acco rding to (4.4). (BOTTOM) The lower plot shows rate estimates for the 9 kBTbarrier height. Both DIMS [Eqs. (4.1) and (3.6)] and unbiased estimates converge toward a common result with inc reasing simulation length. The error bars indicate the standard error of the mean, and under-esti mate the 95% confidence interval. 16V. RESULTS: COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY We demonstrate the capability of the DIMS algorithms of the p revious section by quan- tifying their efficiency for rate computations in the simple b istable potential shown in Fig. 1, U(x) =Eb/parenleftBig (x/l)2−1/parenrightBig2, (5.1) where Ebis the barrier height and lis the length scale of the problem. The central result is that one must account for the most probable crossing to gai n maximum speed-up in rate computation as compared with unbiased simulation. Not surp risingly, the efficiency increases with barrier height. Yet even for the relatively low barrier height of Eb= 5kBT, we achieve roughly a 20-time efficiency improvement — i.e., DIMS rate cal culations are approximately 20 times as fast for a given level of precision. That factor in creases to 300 for a 9 kBTbarrier. While such gains will not be readily extendible to multi-dim ensional systems, it is important to understand and demonstrate the ingredients necessary fo r optimal performance. Fig. 5 shows our results for the potential (5.1) for two differ ent barrier heights, Eb/kBT= 5 and 9. The biasing methods accounting for the most probable crossing are significantly superior for the larger barrier. The “DIMS-Wagner” algorit hm — which takes no account of the most probable path — refers to the technique described in Ref. [14]. It performs only modestly well for the 9 kBTbarrier, and its efficiency is very sensitive to the fixed simul ation length. All the other DIMS procedures employed the algorith m of the previous section, (4.1), above a threshold xh=−0.7, with trajectories initiated at x=−1. The presence or absence of the Jacobian reflects whether (3.6) or (3.7) was used to com plete (4.1), and “CURV” indicates that the curvature-modified width (4.4) was used i n place of the unbiased width (2.4). Rates, k, were calculated using the method noted in Sec. IVA and Fig. 4 . Efficiency is computed by estimating the relative simulation lengths n eeded to obtain a desired degree of precision, given by the variance of the rate estimates, σ2 k=1 nn/summationdisplay i=1(ki− ∝angb∇acketleftk∝angb∇acket∇ight)2, (5.2) where n= 20 is the number of simulations performed for each data poin t,kiis the rate computed for the ith simulation, and ∝angb∇acketleftk∝angb∇acket∇ightis the mean of the nrate estimates. The horizontal arrow spanning the DIMS and unbiased results for Eb= 9kBTat a precision of σk= 10−4, for example, exceeds two decades — indicating that the DIMS c omputations are 100 times faster. The effectiveness of the DIMS formulation excluding the Jacobian — i.e., based on (4.1) and (3.7) with C= 0 — deserves further comment. While the Jacobian-augmente d DIMS simulation is slightly superior for Eb= 9kBT, the insensitivity to including the Jacobian term is surprising given the sharp contrast demonstrated in Fig. 3. The lesson appears to be that, at least for the parameters studied, the motion in th e immediate neighborhood of the barrier top (where the Jacobian term, proportional to th e curvature, has greatest effect) is less important to the anatomy of a crossing event than the ( rapid) climb and descent. In the long term, the success of the non-Jacobian approach coul d facilitate the extension of DIMS to multi-dimensional systems, since that approach doe s not require computation of 17second derivatives of the potential. Future work may show th is to save a substantial amount of computer time. We note that our efficiency estimates have excluded the “overh ead” cost of implementing the DIMS method. This cost depends on the optimization of one ’s code, and as it happens, our code is sub-optimal for unbiased simulation, so that there is no overhead at all. There are, however, inherent overhead costs in DIMS that cannot be optimized away. While the dynamics employing the Jacobian-augmented most probab le path (3.6) requires the computation of a second derivative at every step, our result s show that the simpler form (3.7) is nearly as good and requires only the force. Calculat ing the force, it should be remembered, is not an overhead cost because this must be done in unbiased simulation (2.3) anyway. The only notable cost inherent in the DIMS meth od, then, is computing the error associated with biased computation — in order to corre ct for it as discussed in Refs. [8,14]. This correction entails computing the ratio of two G aussian terms (or, equivalently, the difference of two logarithms) at every step. Compared wit h the fixed cost of unbiased simulation — computing the force and generating a high quali ty pseudo-random number at every step — and its inherent inefficiency with long waiting ti mes, the DIMS costs are far overshadowed by the efficiency gains which here are one and two orders of magnitude. For completeness, we give a number of further details, which apply to both the unbiased and DIMS results. A simulation consisted of Ntrajectories (see Fig. 5) initiated at x=−1 at time t= 0. The time steps were ∆ t= 0.003τ0forEb= 5kBTand ∆ t= 0.001τ0for Eb= 9kBT, with τ0=γ−1. These were determined to be close to the maximum values for which the rate estimates did not change as ∆ tincreased in unbiased simulation. As discussed above, the rate is computed as the slope of the line ar regime in a plot of the arrival probability (to be in the right well, x >0) as a function of time; see Fig. 4. The slopes (rates, ki) were computed from a least-squares fit to 10 data points, the tvalues of which were held fixed for a given barrier height. The particle mass, m, and the thermal energy, kBT, were both set to 1. A. What is the Optimal Efficiency? “The system is so simple. How does one know whether a 300-time improvement in efficiency is impressive?” So a skeptic might wonder, and the a ttempt to answer seems a worthwhile exercise. The basic point is that computing a rate by simulation involv es the simultaneous calcu- lation of a serious of difficult integrals of the form (2.8) dis cussed in Sec. II. Each data point in Fig. 4 is an estimate for such an integral. We can try to estimate the minimum number of trajectories nee ded for the rate com- putation by multiplying together estimates for the followi ng: (i) the number of trajectories needed to estimate the probability density to be at a single location, x, in state B at a given time,P(tj;x∈B|0;A); (ii) the number of discrete locations xin state B required to estimate the probability for the whole state; and, (iii) the number of independent time points needed to estimate a slope in the linear regime. Regarding (i), only in the case of a constant force canP(tj;x∈B|0;A) be computed exactly [44] — equivalently, with a single traj ectory. One might expect that at least 10 trajectories would be required for any real surface, setting (i). In a similar manner for (ii), at least 10 points should be requ ired to characterize a state 18(which, in principle, is known only numerically). The numbe r of independent time points is a slightly more complex issue since some (though not all) t rajectories from a given time point may also be used to estimate another. Conservatively, then, we use the estimate three for (iii). Our estimate for the minimum number of trajectori es required to calculate a rate is thus 300. We believe our DIMS results of Fig. 5 compare favo rably with this heuristic — and conservative — theoretical minimum. 19VI. POSSIBLE EXTENSIONS TO MULTI-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEMS While the results presented here for a one-dimensional pote ntial seem a far cry from a high-dimensional biomolecular system, we believe they te ach important lessons for the large system. The simplest point is that a biased trajectory must closely mimic the natural barrier-crossing dynamics if efficiency in rate computation s is to be obtained. Indeed, we have found that a poor bias can be worse than no bias at all. It i s not enough to know — as one does automatically in one dimension — even the optima l geometric channel for a transition: the size of the steps along that geometric path a re critical, as we have shown. Although the problem of finding channels is extremely challe nging in itself, let us ask “How can one compute the rate for a large system assuming the c hannels are known?” A natural choice would be to start with an initial trajectory w ithin each channel, and then attempt either to optimize it [50,40–42,6,25,51,52] or to g enerate an ensemble of trajectories from it [7,15]. Given the importance of closely following th e optimal course, it seems natural to use an optimization or sampling scheme which builds in the knowledge of the most probable path (3.7) and its multi-dimensional analog. The r isks, otherwise, could be great: since a high-dimensional path will be very rough, it is easy t o imagine a multi-step segment of a trajectory becoming trapped in a region of the potential surface with far too few or too many steps to be even close to optimal. One idea for overco ming this difficulty would be to use a scheme capable of removing and inserting time step s, in order to search for an appropriate distribution of steps along a pre-defined geome tric path. We intend to pursue further investigations along these lines. Returning to the issue of finding multi-dimensional channel s in the first place, we note that the DIMS method is ideally suited to attack this problem since it generates an en- semble of completely independent trajectories. Indeed, we have already developed an al- gorithm which has proved capable of efficiently finding distin ct, important channels in a multi-dimensional system [53]. We have named the idea the “s oft-ratcheting algorithm,” and we note that its efficiency is thus far limited to finding cha nnels, rather than determin- ing rates. The essence of the technique is simple: generate a n unbiased step and accept it with a probability (hence the “softness”) depending on how far the trajectory h as pro- gressed toward the target state. To complete the calculatio n in the DIMS formulation, one then estimates the overall acceptance probability — which i s an inexpensive calculation in a large system. Note that the soft-ratcheting algorithm requ ires no second derivatives of the potential. Finally, a timescale problem could prove serious, even thou gh we do not expect it to be nearly the handicap it is for molecular dynamics. In particu lar, a fundamental limitation of applying the DIMS method (or a related approach [5–15]) to multi-dimensional problems is the barrier-crossing time, tb. In practical terms, tbshows up as the transient time prior to the linear regime in a plot used for rate evaluation (Fig. 4 ). Probability cannot accrue, after all, until crossing events have occurred. In a large sy stem, tbis the limiting timescale for applying a method like DIMS to computing rates. Since a re asonable number, say N, crossing events will be needed to estimate the rate, one woul d have to simulate for a time exceeding Ntb. The authors are unaware of any estimates of tbfor biomolecular systems, but we note that — for the DIMS method to potentially yield a ra te estimate — tbwould have to be less than a nanosecond for a large, explicitly-sol vated protein. Recent work on 20large time steps [54,51,52,15] holds promise, however, for attacking the timescale problem. 21VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated substantial increases in efficiency for calculations of transition rates in bistable potentials with modest barrier heights, 5 kBTand 9kBT, using new biasing methods within the dynamic importance sampling (DIMS) form ulation [8,14]. Computations were sped up by a factor of approximately 300 for the 9 kBTbarrier, and the primary results (Fig. 5) suggest the speed-up will increase substantially f or larger barriers. The critical ingredient in our efficiency was close emulation of probable c rossing events suggested by the Onsager-Machlup action (3.2). The simple one-dimensional problem has been addressed from a variety of theoretical and numerical perspectives in an effort to pave the way for mor e difficult problems. In Sec. III we discussed theoretical and numerical evidence suppor ting the presence of the Jacobian term in the Onsager Machlup action. We then used the resultin g most probable crossing events (computed by others) to motivate and construct a high ly effective biased sampling scheme in Sec. IV. There, we also discussed the desired distr ibution of waiting times between artificial crossing events, as well as the effect (and utility ) of the curvature of the potential. After presenting the explicit results for efficiency levels i n rate computations, we discuss the optimal efficiency one could hope to attain in principle. In commenting on the extension of the DIMS method to large, hi gh-dimensional systems in Sec. VI, we noted that the problem may be conceptually brok en up into two parts: finding the geometric channels, and then sampling trajectories wit hin those channels. The DIMS method is ideally suited for the first step, channel-finding, and we described an explicit algorithm effective in that capacity. Our hope is that the res ults of the present paper will be useful in constructing techniques for the second stage, sin gle-channel trajectory sampling. 22ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Ron Elber, Alan Grossfield, Christopher Jarzynksi, Rohit Pa ppu, Horia Petrache, Jonathan Sachs, and Katharina Vollmayr-Lee generously rea d and offered comments on early versions of the manuscript. The authors also thank Dav id Chandler for informative discussions, Phillip Geissler for pointing out Ref. [32], a nd Shlomo Raz for providing addi- tional computing facilities for this work. We gratefully ac knowledge funding provided by the NIH (under grant GM54782), the AHA (grant-in-aid), the B ard Foundation, and the Department of Physiology. 23REFERENCES [1] R. W. Pastor, in The Molecular Dynamics of Liquid Crystals , edited by G. R. Luckhurst and C. A. Veracini (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherland s, 1994), pp. 85–138. [2] P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251 (1990). [3] D. Chandler, in Clasical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulatio ns, edited by B. Berne, G. Ciccotti, and D. Coker (World Scientifi c Press, Singapore, 1998), pp. 3–23. [4] D. Chandler, in Clasical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulatio ns, edited by B. Berne, G. Ciccotti, and D. Coker (World Scientifi c Press, Singapore, 1998), pp. 51–66. [5] L. R. Pratt, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 5045 (1986). [6] E. M. Sevick, A. T. Bell, and D. N. Theodorou, J. Chem. Phys .98, 3196 (1993). [7] C. Dellago, P. G. Bolhuis, F. S. Csajka, and D. Chandler, J . Chem. Phys. 108, 1964 (1998). [8] T. B. Woolf, Chem. Phys. Lett. 289, 433 (1998). [9] C. Dellago, P. G. Bolhuis, and D. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9236 (1998). [10] F. S. Csajka and D. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1125 (1998). [11] P. G. Bolhuis, C. Dellago, and D. Chandler, Faraday Disc uss.110, 421 (1998). [12] C. Dellago, P. G. Bolhuis, and D. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys .110, 6617 (1998). [13] O. Mazonka, C. Jarzy´ nski, and J. Blocki, Nuc. Phys. A 641, 335 (1998), Erratum: Nuc. Phys. A, 650, 499-500 (1999). [14] D. M. Zuckerman and T. B. Woolf, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 9475 (1999). [15] P. Eastman, N. Grønbech-Jensen, and S. Doniach (unpubl ished). [16] S. Huo and J. Straub, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 5000 (1997). [17] M. J. Ruiz-Montero, D. Frenkel, and J. J. Brey, Molec. Ph ys.90, 925 (1997). [18] A. Ulitsky and D. Shalloway, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1670 (1998). [19] R. Graham, in Fluctuations, Instabilities, and Phase Transitions , edited by T. Riste (Plenum Press, New York, 1975), pp. 215–280, note slips in Eq . (2.49). [20] A. J. Bray and A. J. McKane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 493 (1989). [21] A. J. McKane, H. C. Luckock, and A. J. Bray, Phys. Rev. E 41, 644 (1990). [22] A. J. Bray, A. J. McKane, and T. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 41, 657 (1990). [23] H. C. Luckock and A. J. McKane, Phys. Rev. E 42, 1982 (1990). [24] A. J. McKane, J. Phys. A 26, 5629 (1993). [25] R. Olender and R. Elber, J. Molec. Struc. (Theochem) 398-399 , 63 (1997). [26] M. Bier, I. Der´ enyi, M. Kostur, and R. D. Astumian, Phys . Rev. E 59, 6422 (1999). [27] R. Elber and D. Shalloway, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5539 (2000). [28] R. L. Stratonovich, Sel. Trans. Math. Stat. Prob. 10, 273 (1972), translation of 1962 work in Russian. [29] H. Haken, Z. Physik B 24, 321 (1976). [30] A. Bach, D. D¨ urr, and B. Stawicki, Z. Physik B 26, 191 (1977). [31] C. Wissel, Z. Physik B 35, 185 (1979). [32] R. E. Mortensen, J. Stat. Phys. 1, 271 (1969). [33] C. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985), Ch. 4. [34] R. Graham, in Quantum Statistics in Optics and Solid-State Physics , edited by G. 24H¨ ohler (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973), pp. 1–97, Spring er Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol. 66. [35] U. Weiss, Phys. Rev. A 25, 2444 (1982). [36] V. Baibuz, V. Zitserman, and A. Drozdov, Physica 127A , 173 (1984). [37] M. I. Dykman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2718 (1992). [38] D. G. Luchinsky and P. V. E. McClintock, Nature 389, 463 (1997). [39] K. M¨ uller and L. D. Brown, Theoret. Chim. Acta (Berlin) 53, 75 (1979). [40] R. Czerminski and R. Elber, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5580 (1990). [41] C. Choi and R. Elber, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 751 (1991). [42] S. Fischer and M. Karplus, Chem. Phys. Lett. 194, 252 (1992). [43] M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987). [44] P. E. Kloeden and E. Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992), Ch. 16. [45] L. Onsager and S. Machlup, Phys. Rev. 91, 1505 (1953). [46] S. Coleman, in The Whys of Subnuclear Physics , edited by A. Zichichi (Plenum Press, New York, 1979), pp. 805–942. [47] H. Nakazato, K. Okano, L. Sch¨ ulke, and Y. Yamanaka, Nuc . Phys. B 346, 611 (1990). [48] M. Namiki, Prog. Theoret. Phys. (Supp.) 111, 1 (1993). [49] R. Durrett, Stochastic Calculus, A Practical Introduction (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1996), Ch. 2. [50] M. Berkowitz, J. D. Morgan, J. A. McCammon, and S. H. Nort hrup, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 5563 (1983). [51] R. Olender and R. Elber, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9299 (1996). [52] R. Elber, J. Meller, and R. Olender, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 899 (1999). [53] D. M. Zuckerman, K. Hinsen, and T. B. Woolf (unpublished ). [54] R. E. Gillilan and K. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1757 (1992). 25

arXiv:physics/0005074v1 [physics.bio-ph] 26 May 2000Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97(2000) 4463-4468 Evolution of Biological Complexity Christoph Adami†, Charles Ofria⋆1and Travis C. Collier§ †Kellogg Radiation Laboratory 106-38 and⋆Beckman Institute 139-74 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 §Division of Organismic Biology, Ecology, and Evolution, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 In order to make a case for or against a trend in the evolution of complexity in biological evolution, complexity needs to be both rigorously defined and measurable. A recent information-th eoretic (but intuitively evident) definition identifies genomic com plexity with the amount of information a sequence stores about its en vi- ronment. We investigate the evolution of genomic complexit y in populations of digital organisms and monitor in detail the e volu- tionary transitions that increase complexity. We show that because natural selection forces genomes to behave as a natural “Max well Demon”, within a fixed environment genomic complexity is for ced to increase. Darwinian evolution is a simple yet powerful process that re quires only a population of reproducing organisms in which each offspring has the potential for a heritable variation from its parent. This principle go verns evolution in the natural world, and has gracefully produced organisms of vast complexity. Still, whether or not complexity increases through evoluti on has become a contentious issue. Gould [1] for example argues that any rec ognizable trend can be explained by the “drunkard’s walk” model, where “prog ress” is due simply to a fixed boundary condition. McShea [2] investigate s trends in the evolution of certain types of structural and functional com plexity, and finds some evidence of a trend but nothing conclusive. In fact, he c oncludes that “Something may be increasing. But is it complexity?” Bennet t [3], on the 1Present address: Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan St ate University, Lansing, MI 48824 1other hand, resolves the issue by fiat, defining complexity as “that which increases when self-organizing systems organize themselv es”. Of course, in order to address this issue, complexity needs to be both defin edandmeasur- able. In this paper, we skirt the issue of structural and functiona l complexity by examining genomic complexity . It is tempting to believe that genomic complexity is mirrored in functional complexity and vice ve rsa. Such an hy- pothesis however hinges upon both the aforementioned ambig uous definition of complexity and the obvious difficulty of matching genes wit h function. Several developments allow us to bring a new perspective to t his old prob- lem. On the one hand, genomic complexity can be defined in a con sistent information-theoretic manner (the “physical” complexity [4]), which appears to encompass intuitive notions of complexity used in the ana lysis of genomic structure and organization [5]. On the other hand, it has bee n shown that evolution can be observed in an artificial medium [6, 8], prov iding a unique glimpse at universal aspects of the evolutionary process in a computational world. In this system, the symbolic sequences subject to evo lution are com- puter programs that have the ability to self-replicate via t he execution of their own code. In this respect, they are computational analogs of catalytically active RNA sequences that serve as the templates of their own reproduc- tion. In populations of such sequences that adapt to their wo rld (inside of a computer’s memory), noisy self-replication coupled with finite resources and an information-rich environment leads to a growth in seq uence length as the digital organisms incorporate more and more informat ion about their environment into their genome [7]. These populations allow us to observe the growth of physical complexity explicitly, and also to di stinguish distinct evolutionary pressures acting on the genome and analyze the m in a mathe- matical framework. If an organism’s complexity is a reflection of the physical co mplexity of its genome (as we assume here) the latter is of prime importan ce in evolu- tionary theory. Physical complexity, roughly speaking, re flects the number of base pairs in a sequence that are functional. As is well kno wn, equating genomic complexity with genome length in base pairs gives ri se to a conun- drum (known as the C-value paradox) because large variation s in genomic complexity (in particular in eukaryotes) seem to bear littl e relation to the differences in organismic complexity [9]. The C-value parad ox is partly re- solved by recognizing that not all of DNA is functional; that there is a neutral fraction that can vary from species to species. If we were abl e to monitor 2the non-neutral fraction, it is likely that a significant inc rease in this frac- tion could be observed throughout at least the early course o f evolution. For the later period, in particular the later Phanerozoic Era, i t is unlikely that the growth in complexity of genomes is due solely to innovati ons in which genes with novel functions arise de novo . Indeed, most of the enzyme activ- ity classes in mammals, for example, are already present in p rokaryotes [10]. Rather, gene duplication events leading to repetitive DNA a nd subsequent diversification [11] as well as the evolution of gene regulat ion patterns ap- pears to be a more likely scenario for this stage. Still, we be lieve that the Maxwell Demon mechanism described below is at work during al l phases of evolution and provides the driving force toward ever increa sing complexity in the natural world. Information Theory and Complexity Using information theory to understand evolution and the in formation content of the sequences it gives rise to is not a new undertak ing. Unfor- tunately, many of the earlier attempts (e.g., Refs. [12, 13, 14]) confuse the picture more than clarifying it, often clouded by misguided notions of the concept of information [15]. An (at times amusing) attempt t o make sense of these misunderstandings is Ref. [16]. Perhaps a key aspect of information theory is that informati on cannot exist in a vacuum, that is, information is physical [17]. This statement implies that information must have an instantiation (be it ink on pap er, bits in a computer’s memory, or even the neurons in a brain). Furtherm ore, it also implies that information must be about something . Lines on a piece of paper, for example, are not inherently information until it is disc overed that they correspond to something, such as (in the case of a map) to the r elative location of local streets and buildings. Consequently, any arrangement of symbols might be viewed as potential information (also known as entropy in information theory), but acquires the status of informat ion only when its correspondence, or correlation, to other physical objects is revealed. In biological systems the instantiation of information is D NA, but what is this information about? To some extent, it is the blueprin t of an organ- ism and thus information about its own structure. More speci fically, it is a blueprint of how to build an organism that can best survive i n its na- tive environment, and pass on that information to its progen y. This view corresponds essentially to Dawkins’ view of selfish genes th at “use” their environment (including the organism itself), for their own replication [18]. 3Thus, those parts of the genome that do correspond to somethi ng (the non- neutral fraction, that is) correspond in fact to the environ ment the genome lives in. Deutsch [19] referred to this view as “Genes embody knowledge about their niches”. This environment is extremely complex itself, and con- sists of the ribosomes the messages are translated in, other chemicals and the abundance of nutrients inside and outside the cell, the envi ronment of the organism proper (e.g., the oxygen abundance in the air as wel l as ambient temperatures), among many others. An organism’s DNA thus is not only a “book” about the organism, but is also a book about the envir onment it lives in including the species it co-evolves with. It is well -known that not all the symbols in an organism’s DNA correspond to something . These sec- tions, sometimes referred to as “junk-DNA”, usually consis t of portions of the code that are unexpressed or untranslated (i.e., excise d from the mRNA). More modern views concede that unexpressed and untranslate d regions in the genome can have a multitude of uses, such as for example satel lite DNA near the centromere, or the poly-C polymerase intron excised fro mTetrahymena rRNA. In the absence of a complete map of the function of each a nd every base pair in the genome, how can we then decide which stretch o f code is “about something” (and thus contributes to the complexity o f the code) or else is entropy (i.e., random code without function)? A true test for whether or not a sequence is information uses t he success (fitness) of its bearer in its environment, which implies tha t a sequence’s information content is conditional on the environment it is to be interpreted within [4]. Accordingly, Mycoplasma mycoides for example (which causes pneumonia-like respiratory illnesses), has a complexity o f somewhat less than one million base pairs in our nasal passages, but close to zer o complexity most everywhere else, because it cannot survive in any other environment— meaning its genome does not correspond to anything there. A genetic locus that codes for information essential to an organism’s survi val will be fixedin an adapting population because all mutations of the locus re sult in the or- ganism’s inability to promulgate the tainted genome, where as inconsequential (neutral) sites will be randomized by the constant mutation al load. Examin- ing an ensemble of sequences large enough to obtain statistically significa nt substitution probabilities would thus be sufficient to separ ate information from entropy in genetic codes. The neutral sections that con tribute only to the entropy turn out to be exceedingly important for evoluti on to proceed, as has been pointed out, for example, by Maynard Smith [20]. In Shannon’s information theory [22], the quantity entropy (H) repre- 4sents the expected number of bits required to specify the sta te of a physical object given a distribution of probabilities, that is, it me asures how much information can potentially be stored in it. In a genome, for a site ithat can take on four nucleotides with probabil- ities {pC(i), pG(i), pA(i), pT(i)}, (1) the entropy of this site is Hi=−C,G,A,T/summationdisplay jpj(i) logpj(i). (2) The maximal entropy per-site (if we agree to take our logarit hms to base 4, i.e., the size of the alphabet) is 1, which occurs if all the probabilities are all equal to 1/4. If the entropy is measured in bits (take l ogarithms to base 2) the maximal entropy per site is two bits, which natura lly is also the maximal amount of information that can be stored in a site, as entropy is just potential information. A site stores maximal informat ion if, in DNA, it is perfectly conserved across an equilibrated ensemble. Th en, we assign the probability p= 1 to one of the bases and zero to all others, rendering Hi= 0 for that site according to Eq. (2). The amount of information per site is thus (see, e.g., Ref. [23]) I(i) =Hmax−Hi. (3) In the following, we measure the complexity of an organism’s sequence by applying Eq. (3) to each site and summing over the sites. Th us, for an organism of ℓbase pairs the complexity is C=ℓ−/summationdisplay iH(i). (4) It should be clear that this value can only be an approximatio n to the true physical complexity of an organism’s genome. In reality, si tes are not inde- pendent and the probability to find a certain base at one posit ion may be conditional on the probability to find another base at anothe r position. Such correlations between sites are called epistatic and they can render the entropy per molecule significantly different from the sum of the per-site entropie s [4]. 5This entropy per molecule, which takes into account all epis tatic correlations between sites, is defined as H=−/summationdisplay gp(g|E) logp(g|E) (5) and involves an average over the logarithm of the conditiona l probabilities p(g|E) to find genotype ggiven the current environment E. In every finite population, estimating p(g|E) using the actual frequencies of the genotypes in the population (if those could be obtained) results in cor rections to Eq. (5) larger than the quantity itself [24], rendering the estimat e useless. Another avenue for estimating the entropy per molecule is the creati on of mutational clones at several positions at the same time [25, 8] to measur e epistatic effects. The latter approach is feasible within experiments with sim ple ecosystems of digital organisms that we introduce in the following sectio n, which reveal sig- nificant epistatic effects. The technical details of the comp lexity calculation including these effects are relegated to the Appendix. Digital Evolution Experiments in evolution have traditionally been formidab le due to evolu- tion’s gradual pace in the natural world. One successful met hod uses micro- scopic organisms with generational times on the order of hou rs, but even this approach has difficulties; it is still impossible to perform m easurements with high precision, and the time-scale to see significant adapta tion remains weeks, at best. Populations of E.coli introduced into new environments begin adap- tation immediately, with significant results apparent in a f ew weeks [26, 27]. Observable evolution in most organisms occurs on time scale s of at least years. To complement such an approach, we have developed a tool to st udy evolution in a computational medium—the Avida platform [6]. The Avida system hosts populations of self-replicating computer pro grams in a complex and noisy environment, within a computer’s memory. The evol ution of these “digital organisms” is limited in speed only by the computer s used, with generations (for populations of the order 103−104programs) in a typical trial taking only a few seconds. Despite the apparent simpli city of the single- niche environment and the limited interactions between dig ital organisms, very rich dynamics can be observed in experiments with 3,600 organisms on a 60 ×60 grid with toroidal boundary conditions (see Methods ). As this population is quite small, we can assume that an equilibrium population 6will be dominated by organisms of a single species [28], whos e members all have similar functionality and equivalent fitness (exce pt for organisms that lost the capability to self-replicate due to mutation) . In this world, a new species can obtain a significant abundance only if it has a competitive advantage (increased Malthusian parameter) thanks to a ben eficial mutation. While the system returns to equilibrium after the innovatio n, this new species will gradually exert dominance over the population, bringi ng the previously- dominant species to extinction. This dynamics of innovatio n and extinction can be monitored in detail and appears to mirror the dynamics ofE. coli in single-niche long-term evolution experiments [29]. The complexity of an adapted digital organism according to E q. (4) can be obtained by measuring substitution frequencies at each ins truction across the population. Such a measurement is easiest if genome size is c onstrained to be constant as is done in the experiments reported below, thoug h this constraint can be relaxed by implementing a suitable alignment procedu re. In order to correctly assess the information content of the ensemble of sequences, we need to obtain the substitution probabilities piat each position, which go into the calculation of the per-site entropy Eq. (2). Care mu st be taken to wait sufficiently long after an innovation, in order to give th ose sites within a new species that are variable a chance to diverge. Indeed, s hortly after an innovation, previously 100% variable sites will appear fixe d by “hitchhiking” on the successful genotype, a phenomenon discussed further below. We simplify the problem of obtaining substitution probabil ities for each instruction by assuming that all mutations are either letha l, neutral, or pos- itive, and furthermore assume that all non-lethal substitu tions persist with equal probability. We then categorize every possible mutat ion directly by creating all single-mutation genomes and examining them in dependently in isolation. In that case Eq. (2) reduces to Hi= log28(Nν), (6) where Nνis the number of non-lethal substitutions (we count mutatio ns that significantly reduce the fitness among the lethals). Note tha t the logarithm is taken with respect to the size of the alphabet. This per-site entropy is used to illustrate the variability of loci in a genome, just before and after an evolutionary transition, i n Fig. 1. Progression of Complexity Tracking the entropy of each site in the ge- nome allows us to document the growth of complexity in an evol utionary 701 2520151051 putaddincnop−Cnandgetpushnandpushnop−Callocateif−bit−1nop−Bpoppushaddputnandpopswapnop−Aif−lessswap−stkpopget 504540353026 nop−Adividecallsearch−bif−bit−1shift−raddnandputnanddecputaddshift−rif−n−equputif−n−equnandswapnandgetswapputdecsub 757065605551 if−n−equputshift−rnop−Bnop−Cnop−Cdecaddpushpushif−lessnandnop−Aallocateaddnop−Csubaddaddnop−Cnop−Cnop−Cnop−Csearch−fshift−l 1009590858076 nop−Anop−Anop−Anop−Anop−Anop−Areturnnop−Cif−bit−1incincpushgetgetsearch−bswap−stknop−Ajump−bif−lessinccopynop−Baddnop−Cif−bit−1 2520151051 putaddincnop−Cnandgetpushnandpushnop−Cpopif−bit−1nop−Bpopif−lessaddputnandpopswapnop−Aif−lessswap−stkpopget 504540353026 divideif−n−equcallputif−bit−1shift−raddnandputnanddecputaddshift−rnop−Bnop−Bputnandswapnandgetswapputdecsub 757065605551 if−n−equputpushnop−Bpopnop−Cdecadddecpushif−lessnandnop−Aallocateaddnop−Csubaddaddnop−Cnop−Cnop−Cnop−Csearch−fsub 1009590858076 nop−Anop−Anop−Anop−Anop−Anop−Areturngetif−bit−1shift−rswap−stkpushnop−Bgetallocateswap−stknop−Ajump−bif−lessinccopynop−Baddnop−Cif−bit−1B A Figure 1: Typical Avida organisms, extracted at 2,991 (A) and 3,194 (B) generations respectively into an evolutionary experiment . Each site is color- coded according to the entropy of that site (see color bar). R ed sites are highly variable whereas blue sites are conserved. The organ isms have been extracted just before and after a major evolutionary transi tion. event. For example, it is possible to measure the difference i n complexity between the pair of genomes in Fig. 1, separated by only 203 ge nerations and a powerful evolutionary transition. Comparing their en tropy maps, we can immediately identify the sections of the genome that cod e for the new “gene” that emerged in the transition—the entropy at those s ites has been drastically reduced, while the complexity increase across the transition (tak- ing into account epistatic effects) turns out to be ∆ C≈6, as calculated in the Appendix. We can extend this analysis by continually surveying the ent ropies of each site during the course of an experiment. Figure 2 does th is for the experiment just discussed, but this time the substitution p robabilities are obtained by sampling the actual population at each site. A nu mber of fea- tures are apparent in this figure. First, the trend toward a “c ooling” of the genome (i.e., to more conserved sites) is obvious. Second, e volutionary tran- sitions can be identified by vertical darkened “bands”, whic h arise because the genome instigating the transition replicates faster th an its competitors 8Figure 2: Progression of per-site entropy for all 100 sites t hroughout an Avida experiment, with time measured in “updates” (see Methods ). A gen- eration corresponds to between 5 and 10 updates, depending o n the gestation time of the organism. thus driving them into extinction. As a consequence, even ra ndom sites that are “hitchhiking” on the successful gene are momentarily fix ed. Hitchhiking is documented clearly by plotting the sum of per -site en- tropies for the population (as an approximation for the entr opy of the ge- nome) H≈ℓ/summationdisplay i=1H(i) (7) across the transition in Figure 3A. By comparing this to the fi tness shown in Figure 3B, we can identify a sharp drop in entropy followed by a slower recovery for each adaptive event that the population underg oes. Often, the population does not reach equilibrium (the state of maximum entropy given the current conditions) before the next transition occurs. While this entropy is not a perfect approximation of the exac t entropy per program Eq. (5), it reflects the disorder in the populatio n as a function of time. This complexity estimate (4) is shown as a function o f evolutionary time for this experiment in Figure 4. It increases monotonic ally except for the periods just after transitions, when the complexity est imate (after over- shooting the equilibrium value) settles down according to t hermodynamics’ second law (see below). This overshooting of stable complex ity is a result of 9024681001020304050Total Entropy 024681010−2100102104Fitness Updates [x104] Figure 3: (A) Total entropy per program as a function of evolu tionary time. (B) Fitness of the most abundant genotype as a function of tim e. Evolution- ary transitions are identified with short periods in which th e entropy drops sharply, and fitness jumps. Vertical dashed lines indicate t he moments at which the genomes in Fig. 1 A and B were dominant. the overestimate of complexity during the transition due to the hitchhiking effect mentioned earlier. Its effect is also seen at the beginn ing of evolu- tion, where the population is seeded with a single genome wit h no variation present. Such a typical evolutionary history documents that the phys ical com- plexity, measuring the amount of information coded in the se quence about its environment, indeed steadily increases. The circumsta nces under which this is assured to happen are discussed presently. Maxwell’s Demon and the Law of Increasing Complexity 1002468105060708090100Approximate Complexity (C1) Updates [x104] Figure 4: Complexity as a function of time, calculated accor ding to Eq. (4). Vertical dashed lines as in Fig. 3. Let us consider an evolutionary transition like the one conn ecting the genomes in Figure 1 in more detail. In this transition, the en tropy (cf. Fig. 3A) does not fully recover after its initial drop. The di fference between the equilibrium level before the transition and after is pro portional to the information acquired in the transition, roughly the number of sites that were frozen. This difference would be equal to the acquired inform ation if the measured entropy Eq. (7) were equal to the exact one given by E q. (5). For this particular situation, in which the sequence length is fi xed along with the environment, is it possible that the complexity decreases? The answer is that in a sufficiently large population this cannot happen (in smal ler populations, there is a finite probability of all organisms being mutated s imultaneously, referred to as Muller’s ratchet [30]), as a consequence of a s imple application of the second law of thermodynamics. If we assume that a popul ation is at equilibrium in a fixed environment, each locus has achieved i ts highest en- tropy given all the other sites. Then, with genome length fixe d, the entropy can only stay constant or decrease, implying that the comple xity (being se- quence length minus entropy) can only increase. How is a drop in entropy commensurate with the second law? This answer is simple also : the second law holds only for equilibrium systems, while such a transit ion is decidedly notof the equilibrium type. In fact, each such transition is bes t described as ameasurement , and evolution as a series of random measurements on the environment. Darwinian selection is a filter, allowing o nly informative measurements (those increasing the ability for an organism to survive) to be 11preserved. In other words, information cannot be lost in suc h an event be- cause a mutation corrupting the information is purged due to the corrupted genome’s inferior fitness (this holds strictly for asexual p opulations only). Conversely, a mutation that corrupts the information canno t increase the fitness, because if it did then the population was not at equil ibrium in the first place. As a consequence, only mutations that reduce the entropy are kept while mutations that increase it are purged. Because th e mutations can be viewed as measurements, this is the classical behavio r of the Maxwell Demon. What about changes in sequence length? In an unchanging envi ronment, an increase or decrease in sequence length is always associa ted with an in- crease or decrease in the entropy, and such changes therefor e always cancel from the physical complexity, as it is defined as the differenc e. Note, how- ever, that while size-increasing events do not increase the organism’s physical complexity, they are critical to continued evolution as the y provide new space (“blank tape”) to record environmental information within the genome, and thus to allow complexity to march ever forward. Methods For all work presented here, we use a single-niche environme nt in which resources are isotropically distributed and unlimited exc ept for CPU time, the primary resource for this life-form. This limitation is imp osed by constraining the average sliceof CPU time executed by any genome per update to be a constant (here 30 instructions). Thus, per update a populat ion of Ngenomes executes 30 ×Ninstructions. The unlimited resources are numbers that the programs can retrieve from the environment with the right ge netic code. Computations on these numbers allow the organisms to execut e significantly larger slices of CPU time, at the expense of inferior ones (se e [6, 8]). A normal Avida organism is a single genome (program) composed of a sequence of instructions that are processed as commands to t he CPU of a virtual computer. In standard Avida experiments, an organism’s genome has one of 28 possible instructions at each line. The set of in structions (al- phabet) from which an organism draws its code is selected to a void biasing evolution towards any particular type of program or environ ment. Still, evo- lutionary experiments will always show a distinct dependen ce on the ancestor used to initiate experiments, and on the elements of chance a nd history. To minimize these effects, trials are repeated in order to gain s tatistical signif- icance, another crucial advantage of experiments in artific ial evolution. In 12the present experiments, we have chosen to keep sequence len gth fixed at 100 instructions, by creating a self-replicating ancestor containing mostly non-sense code, from which all populations are spawned. Mut ations appear during the copy process, which is flawed with a probability of error per in- struction copied of 0.01. For more details on Avida , see [31]. Conclusions Trends in the evolution of complexity are difficult to argue fo r or against if there is no agreement on how to measure complexity. We have proposed here to identify the complexity of genomes by the amount of in formation they encode about the world in which they have evolved, a quan tity known asphysical complexity that, while it can be measured only approximately, allows quantitative statements to be made about the evoluti on of genomic complexity. In particular, we show that in fixed environment s, for organisms whose fitness depends only on their own sequence information , physical com- plexity must always increase. That a genome’s physical comp lexity must be reflected in the structural complexity of the organism that harbors it seems to us inevitable, as the purpose of a physically complex geno me is complex information processing , which can only be achieved by the computer which it (the genome) creates. That the mechanism of the Maxwell Demon lies at the heart of th e com- plexity of living forms today is rendered even more plausibl e by the many circumstances which may cause it to fail. First, simple envi ronments spawn only simple genomes. Second, changing environments can cau se a drop in physical complexity, with a commensurate loss in (computat ional) function of the organism, as now meaningless genes are shed. Third, se xual reproduc- tion can lead to an accumulation of deleterious mutations (s trictly forbidden in asexual populations) that can also render the Demon power less. All such exceptions are observed in nature. Notwithstanding these vagaries, we are able to observe the D emon’s op- eration directly in the digital world, giving rise to comple x genomes that, though poor compared to their biochemical brethren, still s tupefy us with their intricacy and an uncanny amalgam of elegant solutions and clumsy remnants of historical contingency. It is in no small measur e an awe before these complex programs, direct descendants of the simplest self-replicators we ourselves wrote, that leads us to assert that even in this v iew of life, spawned by and in our digital age, there is grandeur. 13We thank A. Barr and R.E. Lenski for discussions. Access to a B eowulf system was provided by the Center for Advanced Computation R esearch at the California Institute of Technology. This work was sup ported by the National Science Foundation. Appendix: Epistasis and Complexity Estimating the complexity according to Eq. (4) is somewhat l imited in scope, even though it may be the only practical means for actu al biological genomes for which substitution frequencies are known (such as, for example, ensembles of tRNA sequences [4]). For digital organisms, th is estimate can be sharpened by testing allpossible single and double mutants of the wild- type for fitness, and sampling the n-mutants to obtain the fraction of neutral mutants at mutational distance n,w(n). In this manner, an ensemble of mutants is created for a single wild-type resulting in a much more accurate estimate of its information content. As this procedure invo lves an evaluation of fitness, it is easiest for organisms whose survival rate is closely related to their organic fitness, i.e., for organisms who are not “epist atically linked” to other organisms in the population. Note that this is precise ly the limit in which Fisher’s Theorem guarantees an increase in complexit y [32]. For an organism of length ℓwith instructions taken from an alphabet of sizeD, letw(1) be the number of neutral one-point mutants Nν(1) divided by the total number of possible one-point mutations w(1) =Nν(1) Dℓ. (8) Note that Nν(1) includes the wild-type ℓtimes, for each site is replaced (in the generation of mutants) by each of the Dinstructions. Consequently, the worst w(1) is equal to D−1. In the literature, w(n) usually refers to the average fitness (normalized to the wild-type) of n-mutants. While this can be obtained here in principle, for the purposes of our inform ation-theoretic estimate we assume that all non-neutral mutants are non-via ble [33]. We have found that for digital organisms the average n-mutant fitness closely mirrors the function w(n) investigated here. Other values of w(n) are obtained accordingly. We define w(2) =Nν(2) D2ℓ(ℓ−1)/2, (9) 14where Nν(2) is the number of neutral double mutants, including the wi ld-type and all neutral single mutations included in Nν(1), and so forth. For the genome before the transition (pictured on the left in Fig. 1) we can collect Nν(n) as well as N+(n) (the number of mutants that result in increased fitness ) to construct w(n). In Tab. 1, we list the fraction of neutral and positive n−mutants of the wild-type, as well as the number of neutral or positive found and the total number of mutants tried. Note that we have sampled the mutant distribution up to n= 8 (where we tried 109genotypes), in order to gain statistical significance. The f unction is well fit by a two-parameter ansatz w(n) =D−αnβ(10) introduced earlier [8], where 1 −αmeasures the degree of neutrality in the code (0 < α < 1), and βreflects the degree of epistasis ( β >1 for synergistic deleterious mutations, β <1 for antagonistic ones). Using this function, the complexity of the wild-type can be estimated as follows. From the information-theoretic considerations in the main text, the in- formation about the environment stored in a sequence is C=Hmax−H=ℓ−H , (11) where His the entropy of the wild-type given its environment. We hav e pre- viously approximated it by summing the per-site entropies o f the sequence, thus ignoring correlations between the sites. Using w(n), a multi-site entropy can be defined as Hℓ= logD/bracketleftbig w(ℓ)Dℓ/bracketrightbig , (12) reflecting the average entropy of a sequence of length ℓ. AsDℓis the total number of different sequences of length ℓ,w(ℓ)Dℓis the number of neutral sequences, in other words all those sequences that carry the same information as the wild-type. The “coarse-grained” entropy is just the l ogarithm of that number. Eq. (12) thus represents the entropy of a population based on one wild-type in perfect equilibrium in an infinite populati on. It should approximate the exact result Eq. (5) if all neutral mutants h ave the same fitness and therefore the same abundance in an infinite popula tion. Naturally, Hℓis impossible to obtain for reasonably sized genomes as the number of mutations to test in order to obtain w(ℓ) is of the order Dℓ. This 15is precisely the reason why we chose to approximate the entro py in Eq. (4) in the first place. However, it turns out that in most cases the co nstants αand βdescribing w(n) can be estimated from the first few n. The complexity of the wild-type, using the ℓ-mutant entropy (12) can be defined as Cℓ=ℓ−Hℓ. (13) Using (10), we find Cℓ=α ℓβ, (14) and naturally, for the complexity based on single mutations only (completely ignoring epistatic interactions) C1=αℓ . (15) Table 1: Fraction of mutations that were neutral (first colum n), or positive (second column); total number of neutral or positive genome s found (fourth column), and total mutants examined (fifth column) as a funct ion of the number of mutations n, for the dominating genotype before the transition. nNν(n)N+(n) Tot. Tried 10.1418 0.034 492 2,700 20.0203 0.0119 225 10,000 30.0028 0.0028 100 32,039 44.6 10−46.5 10−4100 181,507 55.7 10−51.4 10−4100 1 .3 106 68.6 10−62.9 10−5100 7 .3 106 71.3 10−65.7 10−6100 5 .1 107 81.8 10−71.1 10−634 1 .0 109 Thus, obtaining αandβfrom a fit to w(n) allows an estimate of the complexity of digital genomes including epistatic interac tions. As an exam- ple, let us investigate the complexity increase across the t ransition treated earlier. Using both neutral and positive mutants to determi new(n), a fit to the data in Table 1 using the functional form Eq. (10) yields β= 0.988(8) (αis obtained exactly via w(1)). This in turn leads to a complexity estimate 16Cℓ= 49.4. After the transition, we analyze the new wild-type again a nd find β= 0.986(8), not significantly different from before the transiti on (while we found β= 0.996(9) during the transition). The complexity estimate according to this fit is Cℓ= 55.0, leading to a complexity increase during the transition of ∆ Cℓ= 5.7, or about 6 instruc- tions. Conversely, if epistatic interactions are not taken into account, the same analysis would suggest ∆ C1= 6.4, somewhat larger. The same analy- sis can be carried out taking into account neutral mutations onlyto calculate w(n), leading to ∆ Cℓ= 3.0 and ∆ C1= 5.4. References [1] Gould, S. J. (1996) Full House (Harmony Books, N.Y.). [2] Mc Shea, D. W. (1996) Evolution 50, 477-492. [3] Bennett, C.H. (1995) Physica D 86, 268-273. [4] Adami, C. & Cerf, N.J. (2000). Physica D 137, 62-69. [5] Britten, R. J. & Davidson, E.H. (1971) Quart. Rev. Biol. 46, 111-138. [6] Adami, C. (1998) Introduction to Artificial Life (Springer, New York). [7] Evolution in an information-poor landscape leads to sel ection for repli- cation only, and shrinking genome size, as in the experiment s of Spiegel- man, see Mills, D.R., Peterson, R. L., and Spiegelman, S. (19 67)Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 58, 217. [8] Lenski, R. E., Ofria, C., Collier, T. C., & Adami, C. (1999 )Nature 400, 661-664. [9] Cavalier-Smith, T. (1985) in The Evolution of Genome Size , T. Cavalier- Smith, ed. (John Wiley, New York). [10] Dixon M. & Webb, E.C. (1964) The Enzymes (Academic Press, New York), 2nd. Ed. [11] Britten, R. J. & Davidson, E. H. (1969) Science 165, 349-357. 17[12] Schr¨ odinger, E. (1945) What is Life? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). [13] Gatlin, L. L. (1972) Information Theory and the Living System (Columbia University Press, New York). [14] Wiley, E. O. & Brooks, D. R. (1982) Syst. Zool. 32, 209-219. [15] In particular, Brillouin’s book [Brillouin, L. (1962) Science and Informa- tion Theory (Academic Press, New York)] has done nothing but confuse a generation of researchers. [16] Collier, J. (1986) Biology and Philosophy 1, 5-24. [17] Landauer, R. (1991) Physics Today 44(5) , 23-29. [18] Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press). [19] Deutsch, D. (1997) The Fabric of Reality (The Penguin Press, New York), p. 179. [20] Maynard Smith, J. (1970) Nature 225, 563. [21] Ofria, C., Adami, C., & Collier, T. C. (1999). Selective pressures on genome size and neutrality in molecular evolution (submitt ed). [22] Shannon C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Com- munication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana). [23] Schneider T. D., Stormo, G. D., Gold, L., & Ehrenfeucht, A. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 188, 415-431. [24] Basharin, G. P. (1959) Theory Prob. Appl. 4, 333-336. [25] Elena, S. F. & Lenski, R. E. (1997) Nature 390, 395-398. [26] Lenski, R. E. (1995) in Population Genetics of Bacteria, Society for General Microbiology, Symposium 52 , eds. Baumberg, S., Young, J. P. W., Saunders, S. R., & Wellington, E. M. H. (Cambridge Univer sity Press, Cambridge), pp. 193-215. [27] Lenski, R., Rose, M. R., Simpson, E. C., & Tadler, S. C. (1 991)Ameri- can Naturalist 138, 1315-1341. 18[28] For these asexual organisms, the species-concept is on ly loosely defined as programs that differ in genotype but only marginally in fun ction. [29] Elena S. F., V. S. Cooper, & Lenski, R. E. (1996) Nature 387, 703-705. [30] Muller, H.J. (1964) Mut. Res. 1, 2-9. [31] Ofria, C., Brown, C.T., & Adami, C. (1998) in [6], pp. 297 -350. [32] Maynard Smith, J. (1970) Studium Generale 23, 371-183, reprinted in J. Maynard Smith (1972) On Evolution (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh), p. 92. [33] As the number of positive mutants becomes important at higher n, in the analysis below we use in the determination of w(n) the fraction of neutral orpositive mutants. 19

arXiv:physics/0005075v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 26 May 2000Solitary coherent structures in viscoelastic shear flow: co mputation and mechanism K. Arun Kumar and Michael D. Graham Department of Chemical Engineering and Rheology Research C enter, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1691. (February 2, 2008) ABSTRACT Starting from stationary bifurcations in Couette-Dean flow , we compute nontrivial stationary solutions in in- ertialess viscoelastic circular Couette flow. These soluti ons are strongly localized vortex pairs, exist at arbitrari ly large wavelengths, and show hysteresis in the Weissenberg n umber, similar to experimentally observed “diwhirl” patterns. Based on the computed velocity and stress fields, w e elucidate a heuristic, fully nonlinear mechanism for these flows. We propose that these localized, fully nonli near structures comprise fundamental building blocks for complex spatiotemporal dynamics in the flow of elastic li quids. PACS. 47.54.+r Pattern formation - 47.50.+d Non-Newtonian fluid fl ows - 83.50.Ax Steady shear flows - 83.85.Pt Flow computation. Flow instabilities and nonlinear dynamics have long been re cognized to occur in flows of viscoelastic poly- mer melts and solutions [1–3]. An important breakthrough, w hich has led to increasing recent attention to these phenomena, was made by Larson, Shaqfeh and Muller [4], who discovered that circular Couette flow of a viscoelastic liquid undergoes an instability loosely anal ogous to the classical Taylor-Couette instability of New- tonian liquids, but driven solely by elasticity - the instab ility is present at zero Taylor (Reynolds) number. They also showed that a linear stability analysis of a simple fluid model predicts instability and elucidated the basic elasticity-driven mechanism of the instability. In partic ular, although many researchers had studied the effects of viscoelasticity on the Newtonian (inertial) Taylor-Cou ette instability, both experimentally [5–9], and theo- retically [10,11,5–7,12], these workers were the first to de monstrate an inertialess, purely elastic mechanism for instability in a viscometric flow. More recent observations have revealed a wealth of interesting dynamics in this flow as well as other simple flows [3,13–15]; one set of experim ental observations of particular interest was made by Groisman and Steinberg [13], who found long-wavelength, stationary axisymmetric vortex pair structures in inertialess viscoelastic flow in the circular Couette geome try. There are two interesting aspects to these obser- vations: (1) isothermal linear stability analysis in this g eometry never predicts bifurcation of stationary states (in contrast to the classical Taylor-Couette case) and (2) t he observations suggest that these vortex pairs, which Groisman and Steinberg dubbed “diwhirls”, can exist in isol ation – there does not seem to be a selected axial wavelength for this pattern. These considerations motivat e the present computational study, which addresses the following questions: (1) Do isolated branches of statio nary solutions exist in a simple model of a viscoelastic fluid in the circular Couette geometry? (2) If so, what are the spatial structures of these? Are they localized? (3) A nonlinear self-sustaining mechanism must be present f or such patterns to exist. Can the computations help us elucidate it? We address these questions by fully nonlinear computations of the branching behavior of an inertialess isother- mal FENE dumbbell fluid in the circular Couette geometry. Int roduction of an azimuthal body force as an additional parameter allows the possibility of accessing s teady solution branches that would be isolated in the parameter space of Couette flow. We find in short that the answe rs to all of the above questions is yes: isolated solution branches consisting of spatially localized coher ent structures have been computed for the first time in a purely elastic flow, in very good agreement with the experime ntal observations, and a heuristic, fully nonlinear mechanism has been elucidated.We consider the flow of an inertialess polymer solution in the annulus between two concentric cylinders. The inner cylinder has radius R1and the outer cylinder has radius R2. The flow is assumed to periodic in the axial direction, and we denote the period, nondimensionalized wi th the gap width R2−R1, byL. The fluid has a relaxation time λ; the polymer and solvent contributions to the viscosity are denoted respectively by ηpandηs, with the ratio ηs/ηpdenoted by S. The flow is created by a combination of the motion of the inner cylinder at a velocity Ω R1and by the application of an azimuthal pressure gradient Kθ=∂P/∂θ . The equations governing the flow are the momentum and mass conservation equations, an d the FENE-P constitutive equation [16], which models polymers as beads connected by finitely extensible sp rings. These may be written in dimensionless form as ∇ ·τ− ∇p+WeθS∇2v= 0, (1) ∇ ·v= 0, (2) Weθ/parenleftbiggDα Dt− {α· ∇v}†− {α· ∇v}/parenrightbigg +/parenleftbiggα (1−tr(α)/b)−I/parenrightbigg = 0, (3) where vis the velocity, pis the pressure, αis the ensemble average of the conformation tensor, and τ= α/(1−tr(α)/b)−Iis the polymer stress tensor, with√ bbeing a dimensionless measure of the maximum extensibility of the dumbbells. The Weissenberg number, Weθis the product of the polymer relaxation time and a characteristic shear rate, which we take to be the shear rate at the outer cylinder for an Oldroyd-B fluid (1 /b= 0) flowing through the geometry. Other important parameter s are the dimensionless gap width, ǫ= (R2−R1)/R2, and δ, which measures the relative importance of the pressure gra dient as the driving force for the flow, given by δ=−Kθǫ2R2/(2 (ηp+ηs)) (1−ǫ)R2Ω−Kθǫ2R2/(2 (ηp+ηs)), (4) so that δ= 0 is circular Couette flow and δ= 1 is Dean flow (pressure driven flow in a curved channel). The velocity satisfies no slip boundary conditions on the walls o f the cylinder. We compute steady, axisymmet- ric solutions to the governing equations using a spectral el ement scheme [17] with Galerkin weighting on the conservation equations and streamline-upwind/Petrov-Ga lerkin weighting [18,19] on the constitutive equations. We use a branch switching technique to compute starting poin ts on non-trivial branches, and pseudo-arclength continuation to trace out solution curves in parameter spac e [20]. The linear systems in the Newton iteration are solved using GMRES [21], with a modified dual threshold pr econditioner [22,23]. We restrict our attention to parameters which are close to th ose used in the experiments by Groisman and Steinberg [13]. Specifically, we choose parameter values S= 1.2, and ǫ= 0.2. The Reynolds numbers in their experiments were<∼1, so our neglect of inertia corresponds well to their experi ments. In our computations, we find that the most interesting behavior occurs only for large values of b, so for the results we present below, we choose a value of 1830. In the Couette flow case ( δ= 0), there is no bifurcation from the viscometric base state to a stationary nontrivial state – if they exist, any branches of nontrivial stationary states in this case are isolated. So to pursue such solutions, an indirect approach must be taken. W e use the fact that in pure pressure-driven flow (δ= 1), stationary bifurcations do exist – by continuity these bifurcations also exist for δ <1 and we search for a route to the Couette case by exploring the evolution of thes e bifurcating branches. Specifically, we traced out a stationary branch originating at δ= 0.576,L= 2.71,Weθ= 25.15, then increased Lto 3.08 while holding the values of the other parameters fixed, then reduced δdownward, finding that this solution branch persisted at δ= 0. We have thereby shown that there is indeed an isolated bra nch of nontrivial stationary patterns in the circular Couette flow geometry. If we now decrease L, we find a turning point at L= 2.94, so these solutions do not exist for wavelengths shorter than this. On the other han d, when we increase L, we find that the solutions exist at arbitrarily large wavelength. Figure 1 shows the co ntours of the streamfunction and αθθatL= 110 .89 ( i.e., the axial wavelength is more than 100 times times the g ap width!) The core of the pattern (which has 2been magnified for clarity) is a region of very strong inflow, s urrounded by regions of much weaker outflow. The αθθfield shows an even more intense localization at the core and r equires the use of a very fine spectral element mesh to resolve. The strong localization at the core and the a symmetry between inflow and outflow are features shared by the experimentally observed diwhirls [13], which indicates that we are capturing the physics behind the structures they observe. Away from the core, the flow field is almost pure circular Couette flow. In obtaining solutions at very large values of L, we exploited the lack of axial variation away from the cente r and the fact that the characteristic length of the localization near the core does not change at large wavelengths by using the same mesh as at smaller values of Lclose to the center, and simply increasing the lengths of the spectral elements bordering the axial edges. Figure 2 shows the results of continuation in Weθfor three different values of L. In each case, we see a turning point in Weθ. It is located at Weθ= 24.97 for L= 3.08, at Weθ= 23.37 for L= 4.72, and at Weθ= 23.55 forL= 9.11. The point at which the diwhirls lose existence is much low er than the critical Weθfor linear instability at that wavelength, so that the overall bifurca tion structure shows a hysteretic character, consistent with experiment. A natural question regarding these new flow states is their st ability. We have performed linear stability analyses with respect to axisymmetric perturbations, for s elected parameter values. These results will be detailed elsewhere [23], but the main result is simple and interestin g: there is an unstable complex conjugate pair of eigenvalues, corresponding to instability with respect to oscillatory disturbances. The destabilizing disturbance , however, has significant amplitude only near the ends of the d omain, where the flow is essentially Couette flow (which is linearly unstable at the parameter values chosen) and vanishes in the core region of the diwhirl. So the picture that emerges is this: the diwhirl pattern is robust, and it coexists with, but is spatially distinct from, the oscillatory finite wavelength pattern arising from the l inear instability. By estimating the work done by a fluid element in a single flow cy cle (as seen in a Lagrangian reference frame), Groisman and Steinberg [24] argued that long wavele ngth stationary structures which exhibited significant asymmetry between inflow and outflow were possible in Couette flow. While this argument shows that diwhirl structures are physically plausible, it does not explain th e mechanism by which they are sustained. Having the complete velocity and stress field available to us, we propos e a more complete mechanism. Figure 3 shows a vector plot of vnear the outer cylinder at the center of the diwhirl structur e. We see that the vθfield at the diwhirl center is locally parabolic near the outer cylinder, simila r to the velocity field in the upper half of the channel in Dean flow, which displays a stationary vortex instability du e to the corresponding unstable stratification of the azimuthal normal stress [25]. We therefore propose the foll owing mechanism for the instability: a local, finite amplitude perturbation near the outer cylinder creates a lo cally parabolic velocity profile. This velocity profile results in an unstable stratification of hoop stress, just as in Dean flow, which drives inward radial motion. The fluid accelerates azimuthally as it moves radially inward, d ue to the base state velocity gradient, thus maintaining the increase in vθ, resulting in a self-sustaining process (figure 4). To summarize, we have computed stationary nontrivial solut ions in circular Couette flow using a FENE-P model by numerical continuation from stationary bifurcati ons in Couette-Dean flow. These solutions show very strong localization, exist only for large values of band large wavelengths, and show a hysteretic character in Weθ. The self-sustaining mechanism is related to the mechanism o f instability in viscoelastic Dean flow, and arises from a finite amplitude perturbation giving rise to a locally parabolic profile of the azimuthal velocity near the upper wall. The computed flow structures are very similar to t he experimentally observed diwhirl patterns [13]. Along with the solutions arising from the linear instabilit y of the circular Couette flow base state, we propose that these solutions form building blocks for spatiotempor al dynamics in the flow of elastic liquids. Financial support from NSF and ACS is gratefully acknowledg ed. We would also like to thank Prof. Bamin Khomami, Prof. R. Sureshkumar, and their research associat es for helpful discussions. [1] C. J. S. Petrie and M. M. Denn. AIChE J. , 22(2):209–236, 1976. [2] R. G. Larson. Rheol. Acta , 31:213–263, 1992. 3[3] E. S. G. Shaqfeh. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 28:129–185, 1996. [4] R. G. Larson, E .S. G. Shaqfeh, and S. J. Muller. J. Fluid Mech. , 218:573–600, 1990. [5] H. Rubin and C. Elata. Phys. Fluids , 9:1929–1933, 1966. [6] M. M. Denn and J. J. Roisman. AIChE J , 15:454–459, 1969. [7] Z.-S. Sun and M. M. Denn. AIChE J , 18:1010–1015, 1972. [8] H. Giesekus. Prog. Heat Mass Transfer , 5:187–193, 1972. [9] G. S. Beavers and D. D. Joseph. Phys. Fluids , 17:650–651, 1974. [10] S. K. Datta. Phys. Fluids , 7:1915–1919, 1964. [11] R. H. Thomas and K. Walters. J. Fluid Mech. , 18:650–651, 1964. [12] M. Lange and B. Eckhardt. Preprint, 2000. Although thes e authors denote the solutions that they find as “diwhirls”, their investigation is confined to regimes where Re≫1 and Weθ/Re≪1, where Reis the Reynolds number. In these parameter regimes, fluid inertia plays a significant ro le. Thus, the patterns they simulate cannot be classified as being driven by elasticity alone. [13] A. Groisman and V. Steinberg Phys. Rev. Lett. , 78(8):1460–1463, 1997. [14] B. M. Baumert and S. J. Muller. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , 83(1–2):33–69, 1999. [15] A. Groisman and V. Steinberg. Nature , 405:53–55, 2000. [16] R. B. Bird, C. F. Curtiss, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassage r.Dynamics of polymeric liquids , volume 2. Wiley, New York, 2nd edition, 1987. [17] Y. Maday and A. T. Patera. In State of the art surveys on computational mechanics , pages 71–143. ASME, 1989. [18] A. N. Brooks and T. J. R. Hughes. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. , 32:199–259, 1982. [19] J. M. Marchal and M. J. Crochet. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , 26:77–114, 1987. [20] R. Seydel. Practical bifurcation and stability analysis . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994. [21] Y. Saad and M. H. Schultz. SIAM J. Sci. Stat Comput. , 7(3):856–869, 1986. [22] Y. Saad. Iterative methods for sparse linear systems . PWS Publishing Company, Boston, 1996. [23] K. A. Kumar and M. D. Graham. In preparation. [24] A. Groisman and V. Steinberg. Phys. Fluids , 10(10):2451–2463, 1998. [25] Y. L. Joo and E. S. G. Shaqfeh. Phys. Fluids A , 3(7):1691–1694, 1991. 4FIGURE CAPTIONS FOR KUMAR AND GRAHAM Figure 1: Density plot of αθθ(white is large tension, black small) and contour plot of the streamfunction at L= 110 .89 (Weθ= 23.52,b= 1830, S= 1.2, and ǫ= 0.2). For clarity, most of the flow domain is not shown. Note the very strong localization of αθθnear the center. Away from the core, the structure is pure cir cular Couette flow. Figure 2: Diwhirl solution amplitudes as functions of WeθandL. Note that the curves at L= 9.11 and L= 4.72 are very close together, while both curves are well separate d from the curve at L= 3.08 (b= 1830, S= 1.2, and ǫ= 0.2) Figure 3: Vector plot of vnear the outer cylinder at the center of the diwhirl structur e (oblique arrows) and the base state (straight arrows). The length of the arrows is proportional to the magnitude of the velocity. The axial velocity is identically zero in the base state, and is z ero by symmetry at the center of the diwhirl. Figure 4: Nonlinear self-sustaining mechanism for the diwhirl patte rns. 5This figure "figure1.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005075v1This figure "figure2.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005075v1This figure "figure3.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005075v1This figure "figure4.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005075v1

/BV/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT /CX/D2 /CP /D7/CX/D1/D4/D0/CT /D2/CT/D8 /DB /D3/D6/CZ/BM /C1/D1/D4/D0/CX/CR/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CU/D3/D6 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /BR/CI/CW/CT/D2 /CH /CT/BW/CT/D4 /CP/D6/D8/D1/CT/D2/D8 /D3/CU /C8/CW/DD/D7/CX/CR/D7 /CP/D2/CS /BV/CT/D2/D8/CT/D6 /CU/D3/D6 /BV/D3/D1/D4/D0/CT/DC /CB/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/D7/B8 /C6/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/CP/D0 /BV/CT/D2/D8/D6 /CP/D0 /CD/D2/CX/DA/CT/D6/D7/CX/D8/DD/B8 /BV/CW/D9/D2/CV/D0/CX/B8 /CC /CP/CX/DB/CP/D2 /BF/BE/BC/BH/BG/B4/C5/CP /DD /BE/BK/B8 /BE/BC/BC/BC/B5/C1/D2 /CP /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ /D3 /CS/DD /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/B8 /CR/D3/D2/D7/D8/CX/D8/D9/CT/D2 /D8/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8 /DB/CX/D8/CW /CT/CP/CR /CW /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6/B8 /CU/D3/D6/D1/CX/D2/CV /CP /D6/CT/CR/D9/D6/D7/CX/DA /CT /D4/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/D2 /D3/CU /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/B9/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CP/D2/CS /CV/CX/DA/CX/D2/CV /D6/CX/D7/CT /D8/D3 /D1/CP/D2 /DD/CX /D2 /D8/CT/D6/CT/D7/D8/CX/D2/CV /D4/CW/CT/D2/D3/D1/CT/D2/CP/BA /BU/CP/D7/CT/CS /D9/D4 /D3/D2 /CR/D3/D2/CR/CT/D4/D8/D7 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D6/D2 /D1/CP/D2 /DD/CQ /D3 /CS/DD /D8/CW/CT/D3/D6/DD /B8 /CP /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D0 /CU/D3/D6 /CP /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CX/CR /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ /D3 /CS /DD/D7 /DD /D7 /D8 /CT /D1 /CX /D7/CS /CT /DA /CT/D0/D3/D4 /CT/CS/BA /BT/D2 /D3 /DA /CT/D0 /CP/D4/D4/D6/D3/CP/CR /CW /CX/D7 /D4/D6/D3/D4 /D3/D7/CT/CS/D8/D3 /CX/D2 /DA /CT/D7/D8/CX/CV/CP/D8/CT /D8/CW/CT /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CP/D0 /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /CX/D2 /D7/D9/CR /CW /CP /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/BA /BT/D2 /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CT/D7/D8/CX/D2/CV /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CX/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/CX/D7 /CU/D3/D9/D2/CS/BA /C8 /D3/D7/D7/CX/CQ/D0/CT /D0/CX/D2/CZ /D8/D3 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CS/DD/D2/CP/D1/CX/CR/D7 /CX/D7 /CS/CX/D7/CR/D9/D7/D7/CT/CS/BA /C1/D8 /CX/D7 /D7/CW/D3 /DB/D2 /CW/D3 /DB /D7/D3/D1/CT /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /CQ/CP/D7/CX/CR /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/D4/D6/D3 /CR/CT/D7/D7/CT/D7/B8 /D7/D9/CR /CW /CP/D7 /D0/CT/CP/D6/D2/CX/D2/CV /CP/D2/CS /D1/CT/D1/D3/D6/DD /B8 /AC/D2/CS /D8/CW/CT/D6/CT/CX/D2 /CP /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CP/D0 /CT/DC/D4/D0/CP/D2/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA/C1/BA /C1/C6/CC/CA /C7/BW/CD/BV/CC/C1/C7/C6/BT /D1/CP /CY/D3/D6 /D8/CP/D7/CZ /CX/D2 /D4/CW /DD/D7/CX/CR/D7 /D6/CT/D7/CT/CP/D6/CR /CW /CX/D7 /D8/D3 /D7/CT/CP/D6/CR /CW /CU/D3/D6 /CV/CT/D2/B9/CT/D6/CP/D0 /D4/D6/CX/D2/CR/CX/D4/D0/CT/D7 /CQ /CT/CW/CX/D2/CS /DA /CP/D6/CX/D3/D9/D7 /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT /D4/D6/D3 /CR/CT/D7/D7/CT/D7/BA /C7/D2/CT /D3/CU/D8/CW/CT /CV/D6/CT/CP/D8/CT/D7/D8 /CP/CS/DA /CP/D2/CR/CT/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D0/CP/D7/D8 /CR/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D6/DD /CX/D7 /D9/D2/CS/CT/D6/D7/D8/CP/D2/CS/CX/D2/CV/D3/CU /CW/D3 /DB /CP /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ /D3 /CS/DD /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1 /D1/CP/D2/CX/CU/CT/D7/D8/D7 /CP/D2/CS /CQ /CT/CW/CP /DA /CT/D7/B8 /D0/CT/CP/CS/B9/CX/D2/CV /D8/D3 /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CX/D1/D4 /D3/D6/D8/CP/D2 /D8 /D4/CW/CT/D2/D3/D1/CT/D2/CP /CX/D2/CR/D0/D9/CS/CX/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /D1 /D9/D0/D8/CX/D4/D0/CT/D7/CR/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/CX/D2/CV /D3/CU /CQ /D3/D8/CW /D5/D9/CP/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CP/D2/CS /CR/D0/CP/D7/D7/CX/CR/CP/D0 /DB /CP /DA /CT/D7/B8 /D8/CW/CT /D5/D9/CP/D2/B9/D8/D9/D1 /C0/CP/D0/D0 /CT/AB/CT/CR/D8/B8 /D8/CW/CT /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CX/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CQ /CT/D8 /DB /CT/CT/D2 /D7/D9/D4 /CT/D6/B9/CR/D3/D2/CS/D9/CR/D8/CX/D2/CV/CP/D2/CS /D2/D3/D6/D1/CP/D0 /D1/CT/D8/CP/D0 /D7/D8/CP/D8/CT/D7 /CP/D2/CS /D7/D3 /D3/D2/BA /C1/D8 /CW/CP/D7 /CQ /CT/CR/D3/D1/CT /CP /CS/CP/CX/D0/DD/CT/DC/D4 /CT/D6/CX/CT/D2/CR/CT /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D1/CP/CR/D6/D3/D7/CR/D3/D4/CX/CR /D3/CQ /CY/CT/CR/D8/D7 /CP/D6/CX/D7/CT /CU/D6/D3/D1 /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/B9/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CQ/CT /D8 /DB /CT/CT/D2 /CX/D2/CS/CX/DA/CX/CS/D9/CP/D0/D7 /CX/D2 /CP /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ/D3/CS /DD /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1 /DB/CW/CX/CR /CW/D1/CP /DD /CQ /CT /D3/CU /D1/CX/CR/D6/D3/D7/CR/D3/D4/CX/CR /D7/CR/CP/D0/CT/BA/C1/D2 /D8/CW/CX/D7 /DB /CP /DD /B8/DB /CT /CP/D6/CT /D0/CT/CS /D8/D3 /CP /CU/D9/D2/CS/CP/D1/CT/D2 /D8/CP/D0 /D5/D9/CT/D7/D8/CX/D3/D2/BM /CP/D6/CT/D8/CW/CT/D6/CT /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CP/D0 /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /DB/CW/CX/CR /CW /CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /D7/CP/CX/CS /CP/CQ /D3/D9/D8 /D8/CW/CT /D1/CP/D2/B9/CX/CU/CT/D7/D8/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ/D3/CS /DD /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7/BA /BT/CS/CS/D6/CT/D7/D7/CX/D2/CV /D8/CW/CX/D7/D5/D9/CT/D7/D8/CX/D3/D2/B8 /D1/CP/D2 /DD /D4/D6/D3/CU/D3/D9/D2/CS /CR/D3/D2/CR/CT/D4/D8/D7 /CW/CP /DA /CT /CQ /CT/CT/D2 /CS/CT/DA /CT/D0/D3/D4 /CT/CS/CP/D2/CS /D1/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/CS /D3 /DA /CT/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D4/CP/D7/D8 /CW/CP/D0/CU /CR/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D6/DD /BA /CC /D3 /D2/CP/D1/CT /CP /CU/CT/DB/B8/D8/CW/CX/D7 /CX/D2/CR/D0/D9/CS/CT/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CX/D8/CX/D3/D2/B8 /CX/D2 /DA /CP/D6/CX/CP/D2/CR/CT /D3/D6 /D7/DD/D1/D1/CT/B9/D8/D6/DD /B8 /CP/D2/CS /D7/DD/D1/D1/CT/D8/D6/DD /CQ/D6/CT/CP/CZ/CX/D2/CV/BN /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT /CR/D3/D2/CR/CT/D4/D8/D7 /CU/CP/CQ/D6/CX/CR/CP/D8/CT /D8/CW/CT/D5/D9/CX/D0/D8 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D6/D2 /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ /D3 /CS/DD /D8/CW/CT/D3/D6/DD /CJ/BD/CL/BA /BT/D2 /CX/D2 /D8/D6/CX/CR/CP/D8/CT/CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/B9/CR/D3/D2/D2/CT/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CP/D1/D3/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT /CX/D7 /D7/D8/CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD /D8/CW/CT /BZ/D3/D0/CS/D7/D8/D3/D2/CT/D8/CW/CT/D3/D6/CT/D1/BA /BT /D7/DD/D1/D1/CT/D8/D6/DD /CQ/D6/CT/CP/CZ/CX/D2/CV /DB/CX/D0/D0 /D6/CT/D7/D9/D0/D8 /CX/D2 /D2/D3/D8 /D3/D2/D0/DD /CP/D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CX/D8/CX/D3/D2/B8 /CQ/D9/D8 /CP/D0/D7/D3 /D8/CW/CT /CP/D4/D4 /CT/CP/D6/CP/D2/CR/CT /D3/CU /D7/D3/D1/CT /D7/D3/D6/D8 /D3/CU /D0/D3/D2/CV /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT /D3/D6/CS/CT/D6/B8 /D3/D6 /D7/DD/D2/CR /CW/D6/D3/D2/CX/DE/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/B8 /D3/D6 /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT/B8 /CS/CT/B9/D4 /CT/D2/CS/CX/D2/CV /D3/D2 /DB/CW/CP/D8 /D7/D9/CQ /CY/CT/CR/D8 /CX/D7 /D9/D2/CS/CT/D6 /D7/CR/D6/D9/D8/CX/D2 /DD /BA /BY /D3/D6 /CT/DC/CP/D1/D4/D0/CT/B8/D8/CW/CT /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CX/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CQ /CT/D8 /DB /CT/CT/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D0/CX/D5/D9/CX/CS /CP/D2/CS /D7/D3/D0/CX/CS /D7/D8/CP/D8/CT/D7/CX/D7 /CP /D6/CT/D7/D9/D0/D8 /D3/CU /CQ/D6/CT/CP/CZ/CX/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D2 /D8/CX/D2 /D9/D3/D9/D7 /D7/D4/CP/CR/CT /CX/D2 /DA /CP/D6/CX/CP/D2/CR/CT/BA/C7/D2/CR/CT /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D1/D1/CT/D8/D6/DD /CQ/D6/CT/CP/CZ/D7/B8 /D4/CW/D3/D2/D3/D2 /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D7 /CP/D4/D4 /CT/CP/D6 /D8/D3 /D6/CT/B9/AD/CT/CR/D8 /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D0/D0/CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT /CQ /CT/CW/CP /DA/CX/D3/D6 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/BA /BT/D0/D8/CW/D3/D9/CV/CW /D8/CW/CT/DD/CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/CP/D8/CX/CR/CP/D0/D0/DD /D3/CQ/D8/CP/CX/D2/CT/CS /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D6/CT/CP/D0/D1 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /D5/D9/CP/D2/B9/D8 /D9 /D1/AC /CT /D0 /CS/D8 /CW /CT /D3 /D6 /DD /B8 /CU/D3/D6 /CX/D2/D7/D8/CP/D2/CR/CT/B8 /CU/D6/D3/D1 /D8/CW/CT /CF /CP/D6/CS/B9/CC /CP/CZ /CP/CW/CP/D7/CW/CX/D6/CT/D0/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/B8 /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT /D4/CW/D3/D2/D3/D2 /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D7 /CP/D6/CT /D2/D3/D8 /D3/CU /D5/D9/CP/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /D3/D6/CX/CV/CX/D2/BA/CC/CW/CX/D7 /D3/CQ/D7/CT/D6/DA /CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D0/CT/CP/CS/D7 /D9/D7 /D8/D3 /CQ /CT/D0/CX/CT/DA /CT /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT /D0/D3/D2/CV/B9/D6/CP/D2/CV/CT/D1/CP/CR/D6/D3/D7/CR/D3/D4/CX/CR /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT /D3/D6 /D3/D6/CS/CT/D6 /CS/D3 /CT/D7 /D2/D3/D8 /D2/CT/CR/CT/D7/D7/CP/D6/CX/D0/DD /D6/CT/B9/D5/D9/CX/D6/CT /CP /D5/D9/CP/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CR/CP/D9/D7/CT/BA/BT /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CP/D0 /D5/D9/CT/D7/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D1/CP /DD /CQ/CT /DB/CW/CT/D8/CW/CT/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ/D3/CS /DD/D8/CW/CT/D3/D6/DD /D1/CP /DD/CQ /CT /CP/D4/D4/D0/CX/CT/CS /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /D4/D6/D3/CQ/D0/CT/D1 /D3/CU /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/B8 /CP /D1/D3/D7/D8/CR/D3/D1/D4/D0/CX/CR/CP/D8/CT/CS /CR/D0/CP/D7/D7/CX/CR/CP/D0 /CW/CX/CT/D6/CP/D6/CR /CW /DD /CZ/CX/D2/CV/CS/D3/D1/BA /C8/CW /DD/D7/CX/CR/CP/D0 /D6/CT/B9/D7/CT/CP/D6/CR /CW /D3/D2 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D7 /D2/D3/D8 /D1/CT/D6/CT/D0/DD /D3/D9/D8 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /D7/CR/CX/CT/D2 /D8/CX/AC/CR/CR/D9/D6/CX/D3/D7/CX/D8 /DD /B8 /CQ/D9/D8 /D6/CP/D8/CW/CT/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D4/D6/D3/CQ/D0/CT/D1 /CX/D7 /D3/D2/CT /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /D1/D3/D7/D8 /CQ/CP/B9/D7/CX/CR /D6/CT/D7/CT/CP/D6/CR /CW /D7/D9/CQ /CY/CT/CR/D8/D7 /CP/D2/CS /CW/CP/D7 /D0/D3/D2/CV /CQ /CT/CT/D2 /CP/D2 /D3/D9/D8/D7/D8/CP/D2/CS/CX/D2/CV/CX/D2/D5/D9/CX/D6/DD /CU/D6/D3/D1 /DA /CP/D6/CX/D3/D9/D7 /D7/CR/CX/CT/D2 /D8/CX/AC/CR /CR/D3/D1/D1 /D9/D2/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7/BA/C5/D3/D8/CX/DA /CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD /D3/D9/D6 /D6/CT/CR/CT/D2 /D8/DB /D3/D6/CZ /D3/D2 /DB /CP /DA /CT /D0/D3 /CR/CP/D0/CX/DE/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CJ/BE/CL/B8 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CX/D7 /CR/D3/D1/D1 /D9/D2/CX/CR/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/B8 /DB /CT /DB/CX/D0/D0 /CU/D3/D6/D1 /D9/D0/CP/D8/CT /CP /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CP/D0 /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D0/CU/D3/D6 /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D2/CV /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ /D3 /CS/DD /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/D7/BA /C1/D8 /DB/CX/D0/D0 /CQ /CT /CR/D0/CT/CP/D6 /D8/CW/CP/D8/D8/CW/CX/D7 /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D0 /CR/CP/D2 /D6/CT/D4/D6/CT/D7/CT/D2 /D8/D1 /CP /D2 /DD /CX/D1/D4 /D3/D6/D8/CP/D2 /D8/D4 /CW /DD/D7/CX/CR/CP/D0 /D7/CX/D8/D9/CP/B9/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7/BA /CC/CW/CT/D2 /CP /D2/CT/DB /CP/D4/D4/D6/D3/CP/CR /CW /DB/CX/D0/D0 /CQ /CT /D4/D6/D3/D4 /D3/D7/CT/CS /D8/D3 /D7/D8/D9/CS/DD /D8/CW/CT/D1/D3 /CS/CT/D0/BA /C6/D9/D1/CT/D6/CX/CR/CP/D0 /CT/DC/CP/D1/D4/D0/CT/D7 /DB/CX/D0/D0 /CQ/CT /D4/D6/CT/D7/CT/D2 /D8/CT/CS/B8 /CU/D3/D0/D0/D3 /DB /CT/CS/CQ /DD /CP /CS/CX/D7/CR/D9/D7/D7/CX/D3/D2 /D3/D2 /D8/CW/CT/CX/D6 /CX/D1/D4/D0/CX/CR/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7 /CU/D3/D6 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA/C1 /C1/BA /CC/C0/BX /C5/C7/BW/BX/C4/CF/CX/D8/CW/D3/D9/D8 /CR/D3/D1/D4/D6/D3/D1/CX/D7/CX/D2/CV /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CP/D0/CX/D8 /DD /CP/D2/CS /CU/D3/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D7/CP/CZ /CT/D3 /CU/D7/CX/D1/D4/D0/CX/CR/CX/D8 /DD /B8 /DB /CT /D7/D8/CP/D6/D8 /DB/CX/D8/CW /CR/D3/D2/D7/CX/CS/CT/D6/CX/D2/CV /CP /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1 /CR/D3/D2/D7/CX/D7/D8/B9/CX/D2/CV /D3/CU /C6 /CT/D0/CT/CR/D8/D6/CX/CR /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT/D7/BA /CC/CW/CT/D7/CT /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT/D7 /CR/CP/D2 /CQ/CT /CT/CX/D8/CW/CT/D6/D6 /CP/D2/CS/D3/D1/D0/DD /D3/D6 /D6 /CT /CV/D9/D0/CP/D6/D0/DD /CS/CX/D7/D8/D6/CX/CQ/D9/D8/CT/CS /CX/D2 /CP /D7/D4/CP/CR/CT /DB/CW/CX/CR /CW /CR/CP/D2/CQ/CT /CT/CX/D8/CW/CT/D6 /D3/D2/CT/B8 /D8 /DB /D3/B8 /D3/D6 /D8/CW/D6/CT/CT /CS/CX/D1/CT/D2/D7/CX/D3/D2/CP/D0/BA /CC/CW/CT /CU/D3/D6/D1/CT/D6/CU/D3/D6/D1/D7 /D6/CP/D2/CS/D3/D1 /CP/D6/D6/CP /DD/D7 /D3/CU /D3/CQ /CY/CT/CR/D8/D7/B8 /DB/CW/CX/D0/CT /D8/CW/CT /D0/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6 /DB /D3/D9/D0/CS/CU/D3/D6/D1 /CP /CR/D6/DD/D7/D8/CP/D0 /D0/CP/D8/D8/CX/CR/CT /CP/D0/D0/D3 /DB/CX/D2/CV /CQ/CP/D2/CS /D7/D8/D6/D9/CR/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /D8/D3 /CP/D4/D4 /CT/CP/D6/BA/CC/CW/CT /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8 /DB/CX/D8/CW /CT/CP/CR /CW /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6 /D8/CW/D6/D3/D9/CV/CW /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/D1/CX/D8/B9/D8/CX/D2/CV /CT/D0/CT/CR/D8/D6/CX/CR/CP/D0 /DB /CP /DA /CT/D7 /DB/CW/CT/D2 /CT/CP/CR /CW /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT /D3/D7/CR/CX/D0/D0/CP/D8/CT/D7/BA /BT /CR/D3/D2/B9/CR/CT/D4/D8/D9/CP/D0 /D0/CP /DD /D3/D9/D8 /CX/D7 /D4/D6/CT/D7/CT/D2 /D8/CT/CS /CX/D2 /BY/CX/CV/BA /BD X Y Z /BY/C1/BZ/BA /BD/BA /BT /CR/D3/D2/CR/CT/D4/D8/D9/CP/D0 /D0/CP /DD /D3/D9/D8 /D3/CU /CP /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/CC/CW/CT /CT/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D1/D3/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CU/D3/D6 /CP/D2 /DD /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT /CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /CT/CP/D7/CX/D0/DD /CS/CT/B9/CS/D9/CR/CT/CS /CU/D6/D3/D1 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D0/CT/CR/D8/D6/D3/B9/D1/CP/CV/D2/CT/D8/CX/CR /D8/CW/CT/D3/D6/DD /CJ/BF/CL/BA /C6/CT/CV/D0/CT/CR/D8/CX/D2/CV/D8/CT/D6/D1/D7 /CW/CX/CV/CW/CT/D6 /D8/CW/CP/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D7/CT/CR/D3/D2/CS /D3/D6/CS/CT/D6/B8 /CU/D3/D6 /D8/CW/CT /CX /B9/D8/CW /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT/B8/CU/D3/D6 /CT/DC/CP/D1/D4/D0/CT/B8 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D1/D3/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CU/D3/D6 /D8/CW/CT /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT /D3/D7/CR/CX/D0/B9 /D0/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D7/CS /BE/C9/CX /CS/D8 /BE /B7 /AX /BE/CX /C9/CX /B7 /AD/CX /CS/C9/CX /CS/D8 /BP /BY/CX /B4 /D8 /B5/B7 /C6/CG/CY /BP/BD /BN/CY /BI/BP /CX /BV/CX/CY /AI/BD /A0 /BD /BE /C9/CX /CM /DE/CX /A1/D6 /AJ/BW /CX/CY /BW/D8 /BE /C9/CY /B4 /D8 /A0/CY /DI /D6/CX /A0 /DI /D6/CY /CY /BP/CR /B5 /CY /DI /D6/CX /A0 /DI /D6/CY /CY /BN/BD/B4/BD/B5/DB/CW/CT/D6/CT/BW /CX/CY /BW/D8 /BE /BP/CJ /B4 /CM /D6/CX/CY /A1 /CM /DE/CX /B5/B4 /CM /D6/CX/CY /A1 /CM /DE/CY /B5 /A0 /BD/CL /CS /BE /CS/D8 /BE /BM/C1/D2 /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT/B8 /C9/CX /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D3/D7/CR/CX/D0/D0/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CS/CX/D7/D4/D0/CP/CR/CT/D1/CT/D2 /D8 /DB/CX/D8/CW /AX/CX /CQ/CT /CX /D2 /CV/D8/CW/CT /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CP/D0 /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /CP/D2/CS /AD/CX /CQ /CT/CX/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /CS/CP/D1/D4/CX/D2/CV /CU/CP/CR/D8/D3/D6/B8/CM /DE/CX /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D9/D2/CX/D8 /DA /CT/CR/D8/D3/D6 /CP/D0/D3/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT /CS/CX/D6/CT/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /CX /B9/D8/CW/CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT/B8 /CM /D6/CX/CY /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D9/D2/CX/D8 /DA /CT/CR/D8/D3/D6 /D4 /D3/CX/D2 /D8/CX/D2/CV /CU/D6/D3/D1 /D8/CW/CT /CY /B9/D8/CW /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT/D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /CX /B9/D8/CW /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT/B8 /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D9/D4/D0/CX/D2/CV /CR/D3/D2/D7/D8/CP/D2 /D8 /BV/CX/CY /BP /A0 /D5/CX /D5/CY /AM/BC /BE /AP/D1/CX /BA/C1/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D4/D6/CT/D7/CT/D2 /D8 /D4/CP/D4 /CT/D6 /DB /CT /CX/CV/D2/D3/D6/CT /D8/CW/CT /D6/D3/D8/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/CP/D0 /D1/D3/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU/D8/CW/CT /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT/D7/B8 /DB/CW/CX/CR /CW /CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /CP/CS/CS/CT/CS /DB/CX/D8/CW /CT/CP/D7/CT/BA/CC/CW/CT /D7/CT/CR/D3/D2/CS /D8/CT/D6/D1 /D3/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CA/C0/CB /D3/CU /BX/D5/BA /B4/BD/B5 /CS/CT/D2/D3/D8/CT/D7 /D8/CW/CT/D2/D3/D2/D0/CX/D2/CT/CP/D6 /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA /BY /D3/D6 /D8/CW/CT /AC/D6/D7/D8 /D7/D8/CT/D4 /CP/D2/CP/D0/DD/D7/CX/D7/B8 /D8/CW/CX/D7/CT/AB/CT/CR/D8 /D1/CP /DD /CQ/CT /CS/D6/D3/D4/D4 /CT/CS/BA /BX/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /B4/BD/B5 /CR/CP/D2 /CU/D3/D6/D1/CP/D0/D0/DD /CQ/CT/CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CP/D0/CX/DE/CT/CS /CP/D7/C4/CX /B4 /BS /B5 /AW/CX /BP /BY/CX /B7 /CG/CY /BP/BD /BN/CY /BI/BP /CX /CM/CC/CX/CY /CJ /AW/CY /CL /BN /B4/BE/B5/DB/CW/CT/D6/CT /AW/CX /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D4/CW /DD/D7/CX/CR/CP/D0 /D5/D9/CP/D2 /D8/CX/D8 /DD /D9/D2/CS/CT/D6 /CR/D3/D2/D7/CX/CS/CT/D6/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/BN/CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CS/CX/D4 /D3/D0/CT /CR/CP/D7/CT /AW/CX /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CS/CX/D7/D4/D0/CP/CR/CT/D1/CT/D2 /D8/B8 /BY/CX /D6/CT/CU/CT/D6/D7 /D8/D3/D8/CW/CT /CT/DC/D8/CT/D6/D2/CP/D0 /D7/D8/CX/D1 /D9/D0/CX /CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT /CX /B9/D8/CW /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8 /DD /B8 /CM/CC/CX/CY /CX/D7 /CP/D2 /D3/D4 /CT/D6/CP/D8/D3/D6/D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CU/CT/D6/D6/CX/D2/CV /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CQ/CT /D8 /DB /CT/CT/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CX /B9/D8/CW /CP/D2/CS /CY /CR/D3/D1/D4 /D3/B9/D2/CT/D2 /D8/DB /CW /CX /CR /CW /D9/D7/D9/CP/D0/D0/DD /CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /DB/D6/CX/D8/D8/CT/D2 /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/D1/D7 /D3/CU /CP /BU/D3/D7/D3/D2/CX/CR/D4/D6/D3/D4/CP/CV/CP/D8/D3/D6/BA /CC/CW/CT /D3/D4 /CT/D6/CP/D8/D3/D6 /C4 /B4 /BS /B5 /CX/D7 /CR/CP/D0/D0/CT/CS /CS/CX/DA/CX/D7/D3/D6 /D3/CQ/D8/CP/CX/D2/CT/CS/DB/CW/CT/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D1/CP/D2 /DD/CQ /D3 /CS /DD /CX /D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D7 /D2/D3/D8 /D4/D6/CT/D7/CT/D2 /D8 /CJ/BD/CL/BA /CB/D3 /CU/CP/D6/B8/CX/D2 /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT /D8/CW/CT/D6/CT /CP/D6/CT /D8 /DB /D3 /CZ/D2/D3 /DB/D2 /D8 /DD/D4 /CT/D7 /D3/CU /CS/CX/DA/CX/D7/D3/D6/D7/BA /CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1/D9/D7/D9/CP/D0/D0/DD /D6/CT/CU/CT/D6/D7 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /CQ /D3/D7/D3/D2 /D0/CX/CZ /CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/D7 /CP/D2/CS /CX/D7 /DB/D6/CX/D8/D8/CT/D2 /CP/D7/CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /BM /C4 /B4 /BS /B5/BP /BD /CR /BE /BS /BE /BS/D8 /BE /A0 /AX /BE/B4 /D6 /B5 /BM/CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /C1 /CS/CX/DA/CX/D7/D3/D6 /D9/D7/D9/CP/D0/D0/DD /D6/CT/CU/CT/D6/D7 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /CU/CT/D6/D1/CX/D3/D2 /D0/CX/CZ /CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/D7/CP/D2/CS /CX/D7 /DB/D6/CX/D8/D8/CT/D2 /CP/D7/CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /C1 /BM /C4 /B4 /BS /B5/BP /CX /AM/CW /BS /BS/D8 /A0 /AF /B4 /D6 /B5 /BM/C1/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CP/CQ /D3 /DA /CT /AX /B4 /D6 /B5 /CP/D2/CS /AF /B4 /D6 /B5 /D6/CT/CU/CT/D6 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /D3/D4 /CT/D6/CP/D8/D3/D6/D7 /D8/CW/CP/D8/CV/CX/DA /CT /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /D7/D4 /CT/CR/D8/D6/CP /CX/D2 /CP/CQ/D7/CT/D2/CR/CT /D3/CU /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2/B8 /CX/BA /CT/BA /D8/CW/CT/CQ/CP/D6/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /BA/BX/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /B4/BE/B5 /CP/CR/CR/D3/D1/D1/D3 /CS/CP/D8/CT/D7 /CP /DA /CP/D6/CX/CT/D8 /DD /D3/CU /D4/D6/D3/CQ/D0/CT/D1/D7 /D3/CU/CV/D6/CT/CP/D8 /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CT/D7/D8/BA/CB/D3/D0/CX/CS /D0/CP/D8/D8/CX/CR/CT/D7/BA /CC/CW/CT /DA/CX/CQ/D6/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /D0/CP/D8/D8/CX/CR/CT /CU/D3/D6/D1/CT/CS /CQ /DD/CP/D8/D3/D1/D7 /CX/D7 /CS/CT/D7/CR/D6/CX/CQ /CT/CS /CQ /DD/B4/A8/D0/D0 /A0 /AX /BE/D0 /B5 /D9/D0 /B7 /CG/D0 /BC/BI/BP /D0 /A8/D0/D0 /BC/D9/D0 /BC/BP/BC /BN /B4/BF/B5/DB/CW/CT/D6/CT /A8/CX/CY /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CU/D3/D6/CR/CT /D8/CT/D6/D1/B8 /D9/D0 /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CS/CX/D7/D4/D0/CP/CR/CT/D1/CT/D2 /D8/B8 /CP/D2/CS /AX/D0/CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CP/D0 /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /BA /BV/D0/CT/CP/D6/D0/DD /D8/CW/CX/D7 /CT/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D6/CT/D7/CT/D1 /CQ/D0/CT/D7/BX/D5/D7/BA /B4/BD/B5 /CP/D2/CS /B4/BE/B5/BA/CB/D4/CX/D2 /CP/D6/D6/CP /DD/D7/BA /BY /D6/D3/D1 /D8/CW/CT /C0/CP/D1/CX/D0/D8/D3/D2/CX/CP/D2/C0 /BP /A0 /BD /BE /CG/D0/D0 /BC /C2/D0/D0 /BC /DI/CB/D0 /A1 /DI/CB/D0 /BC/BN/DB /CT /CS/CT/AC/D2/CT /CB /A6/D0 /BP /CB /DE/D0 /A6 /CX/CB /DD/D0 /B8 /D8/CW/CT/D2 /BE/BG /BK/BO/BM /BE /CB /CG/D0 /BC/BI/BP /D0 /C2/CZ /B4 /D0/D0 /BC/B5 /BL/BP/BN /A0 /AM/CW/AX /BF/BH/CB /A0/D0 /A0 /BE /CB /CG/D0 /BC/BI/BP /D0 /C2/BR /B4 /D0/D0 /BC/B5 /CB /A0/D0 /BC /BP/BC/B4/BG/B5/DB/CW/CT/D6/CT /CB /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D8/D3/D8/CP/D0 /D7/D4/CX/D2/B8 /CP/D2/CS /C2/CZ /BN /BR /CP/D6/CT /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D9/D4/D0/CT /CR/D3/D2/B9/D7/D8/CP/D2 /D8/D7/BA /CC/CW/CX/D7 /CX/D7 /CP/D0/D7/D3 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CU/D3/D6/D1 /D3/CU /BX/D5/BA /B4/BE/B5/BA/BX/D0/CT/CR/D8/D6/D3/D2/CX/CR /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/D7/BA /BY /D6/D3/D1 /D8/CW/CT /CB/CW/D6/DJ /D3/CS/CX/D2/CV/CT/D6 /CT/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/AK/A0 /AM/CW /BE /BE /D1 /D6 /BE/B7 /CE /B4 /DI /D6 /B5 /AL/AW /B4 /DI /D6 /B5/BP /BX/AW /B4 /DI /D6 /B5/DB/CX/D8/CW/CE /B4 /DI /D6 /B5/BP /CG/D0 /CE/D0 /B4 /DI /D6 /A0 /DI/CA/D0 /B5 /BM/C1/D2 /D8/CT/D6/D1/D7 /D3/CU /C4/BV/BT /C7 /B4/C4/D3 /CR/CP/D0 /BV/D3/D1 /CQ/CX/D2/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /BT /D8/D3/D1/CX/CR /C7/D6/B9/CQ/CX/D8/D7/B5/B8 /DB /CT /D3/CQ/D8/CP/CX/D2/AW /B4 /DI /D6 /B5/BP /CG/D0 /D9 /AB/D0 /B4 /DI /D6 /A0 /DI/CA/D0 /B5 /BN/D8/CW/CT/D2/B4 /AF /AB/D0 /A0 /AF /B5 /D9 /AB/D0 /B7 /CG/D0 /BI/BP /D0 /BC /CE /AB/AC/D0/D0 /BC /D9 /AC/D0 /BC /BP/BC /BM /B4/BH/B5/CC/CW/CX/D7 /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /C1 /DA /CT/D6/D7/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /BX/D5/BA /B4/BE/B5/BA/C5/D9/D0/D8/CX/D4/D0/CT /D7/CR/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/CX/D2/CV /D3/CU /CR/D0/CP/D7/D7/CX/CR/CP/D0 /DB /CP /DA /CT/D7/BA /C5/D9/D0/D8/CX/D4/D0/CT/D7/CR/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/CX/D2/CV /D3/CU /DB /CP /DA /CT/D7 /CX/D7 /CT/D7/D8/CP/CQ/D0/CX/D7/CW/CT/CS /CQ /DD /CP/D2 /CX/D2/AC/D2/CX/D8/CT /D6/CT/CR/D9/D6/D7/CX/DA /CT/D4/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/D2 /D3/CU /D6/CT/D7/CR/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/CX/D2/CV /CQ /CT/D8 /DB /CT/CT/D2 /D7/CR/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/CT/D6/D7/BA /CC/CW/CT /D4/D6/D3 /CR/CT/D7/D7/CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /D7/D3/D0/DA /CT/CS /CU/D6/D3/D1 /CP /D7/CT/D8 /D3/CU /CR/D3/D9/D4/D0/CT/CS /CT/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7/D4/D7 /B4 /DI /D6/BN /DI /D6/CX /B5/BP/A5/CX /BC/BS/D4/BC /B4 /DI /D6/CX /B5/B7 /CG/CY /BI/BP /CX /D4/D7 /B4 /DI /D6/CX /BN/DI /D6/CY /B5 /BD/BT/BZ /B4 /CS /B5/B4 /DI /D6/BN /DI /D6/CX /B5 /BN /B4/BI/B5/DB/CW/CT/D6/CT /BZ /CS/CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D4/D6/D3/D4/CP/CV/CP/D8/D3/D6 /CX/D2 /CS /CS/CX/D1/CT/D2/D7/CX/D3/D2/BA /CC/CW/CX/D7 /CX/D7 /CP/DA /CT/D6/D7/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /CT/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D1/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /D7/D4/CP/CR/CT/BA/C1/D2 /D7/D9/D1/D1/CP/D6/DD /B8 /BX/D5/BA /B4/BE/B5 /D6/CT/D4/D6/CT/D7/CT/D2 /D8/D7 /CP /DB/CX/CS/CT /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT /D3/CU /D1/CP/D2 /DD/CQ /D3 /CS/DD /D4/D6/D3/CQ/D0/CT/D1/D7/BA /C1/D8 /D6/CT/AD/CT/CR/D8/D7 /CP /CQ/CP/D7/CX/CR /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ/D3/CS /DD /CX /D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2/D4/CX/CR/D8/D9/D6/CT/BA /CC/CW/CT /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CP/D1/D3/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D2/D7/D8/CX/D8/D9/CT/D2 /D8/D7 /CX/D7 /D1/CT/CS/CX/B9/CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD/DB /CP /DA /CT/D7/BA /CC/CW/CX/D7 /CX/D7 /CR/D3/D1/D1/D3/D2 /CX/D2 /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/BA /CF /CT/DB /D3/D9/D0/CS /D0/CX/CZ /CT/D8/D3 /CT/DC/D4/D0/D3/D6/CT /D7/D3/D1/CT /D2/CT/DB /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /CT/D1 /CQ /CT/CS/CS/CT/CS /CX/D2 /BX/D5/BA /B4/BE/B5/BA /CF /CT/CR/D3/D2/D7/CX/CS/CT/D6 /DB /CP /DA /CT /D4/D6/D3/D4/CP/CV/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D2 /CP /CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/BA /CC/CW/CT /CX/D2/CR/CX/B9/CS/CT/D2 /D8/DB /CP /DA /CT /DB /CX /D0 /D0/CQ /CT/CX /D2 /D8/CT/D6/CU/CT/D6/CT/CS /CQ /DD /D6/CP/CS/CX/CP/D8/CT/CS /DB /CP /DA /CT/D7 /CU/D6/D3/D1 /CT/CP/CR /CW/CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8 /DD /B9 /D8/CW/CT /D6/CP/CS/CX/CP/D8/CT/CS /DB /CP /DA /CT/D7 /CP/D6/CT /CP /D6/CT/D7/D4 /D3/D2/D7/CT /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /CX/D2/CR/CX/CS/CT/D2 /D8/DB /CP /DA /CT/BA /CC/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /AD/D3 /DB/CX /D7 /DI/C2 Ꜵ /CA/CT/CJ /D9 /BR/B4 /A0 /CX /D6 /B5 /D9 /CL /BM /CF /D6/CX/D8/CX/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT/AC/CT/D0/CS /CP/D7 /BT/CT /CX/AI/B8 /D8/CW/CT /CR/D9/D6/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /CQ /CT/CR/D3/D1/CT/D7 /BT /BE/D6 /AI /B8/CP /DA /CT/D6/D7/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT/C5/CT/CX/D7/D7/D2/CT/D6 /CT/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA /CC/CW/CX/D7 /CW/CX/D2 /D8/D7 /CP/D8 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /DB/CW/CT/D2 /AI /CX/D7 /CR/D3/D2/D7/D8/CP/D2 /D8/DB/CW/CX/D0/CT /BT /BI/BP /BC/B8 /D8/CW/CT /AD/D3 /DB /D7/D8/D3/D4/D7 /CP/D2/CS /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /DB/CX/D0/D0 /CQ /CT /D0/D3 /CR/CP/D0/CX/DE/CT/CS/CX/D2 /D7/D4/CP/CR/CT/BA /CC/CW/CX/D7 /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CX/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D7 /CR/D3/D2/CS/CT/D2/D7/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D7/CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D6/CT/CP/D0 /D7/D4/CP/CR/CT/B8 /CX/D2 /CR/D3/D2 /D8/D6/CP/D7/D8 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /BV/D3 /D3/D4 /CT/D6 /D4/CP/CX/D6 /CR/D3/D2/CS/CT/D2/B9/D7/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D1/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /D7/D4/CP/CR/CT /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D7/D9/D4 /CT/D6/CR/D3/D2/CS/D9/CR/D8/CX/DA/CX/D8 /DD /BA/CC/CW/CX/D7 /CX/D7 /D9/D7/CT/CU/D9/D0 /CP/D7 /CX/D8 /CX/D1/D4/D0/CX/CT/D7 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/CS /CX/D2 /CR/CT/D6/D8/CP/CX/D2 /D7/D4/CP/D8/CX/CP/D0 /CS/D3/D1/CX/CP/D2/D7/BN /CP/D7 /DB/CX/D0/D0 /CQ /CT /CR/D0/CT/CP/D6/B8 /CX/D8 /D0/CX/D2/CZ/D7 /D8/D3 /D7/D3/D1/CT/CQ/CP/D7/CX/CR /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /D3/CU /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA/BE/C1 /C1 /C1/BA /CA/BX/CB/CD/C4 /CC/CB /BT/C6/BW /C1/C5/C8/C4/C1/BV/BT /CC/C1/C7/C6/CB /BY /C7/CA /BU/CA/BT/C1/C6/BY/CD/C6/BV/CC/C1/C7/C6/CF /CT/D7 /D3 /D0 /DA /CT /BX/D5/BA /B4/BE/B5 /CU/D3/D6 /CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /D7/CX/D8/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD/CS/D3/D1/CP/CX/D2/BA /CC/CW/CT/D6/CT /CP/D6/CT /C6 /CQ /D3 /CS/CX/CT/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/B8 /D6/CT/CU/CT/D6/D6/CX/D2/CV /D8/D3/BY/CX/CV/BA /BD /B8 /CP/D2/CS /D8/CW/CT/DD /CP/D6/CT /CT/DC/CR/CX/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD /CP /D4 /D3/CX/D2 /D8 /D7/D3/D9/D6/CR/CT /D0/D3 /CR/CP/D8/CT/CS/CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D1/CX/CS/CS/D0/CT /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT /CQ/D3/CS /CX /CT /D7 /BA /CC /D3 /CU/D9/D6/D8/CW/CT/D6 /D7/CX/D1/D4/D0/CX/CU/DD /D3/D9/D6/CS/CX/D7/CR/D9/D7/D7/CX/D3/D2/B8 /DB /CT /CP/D7/D7/D9/D1/CT /D8/CW/CP/D8 /CP/D0/D0 /CT/D0/CT/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/CP/D6/CT /CX/CS/CT/D2 /D8/CX/CR/CP/D0 /CP/D2/CS /D8/CW/CT /CX/D2 /D8/CT/D6/CP/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D7 /CX/D7/D3/D8/D6/D3/D4/CX/CR/BN /D8/CW/CT /D7/D8/D9/CS/DD /D3/CU/CP/D2/CX/D7/D3/D8/D6/D3/D4/CX/CR /CR/CP/D7/CT/D7 /CX/D7 /D4 /D3/D7/D7/CX/CQ/D0/CT /CQ/D9/D8 /CR/D3/D1 /D9/D4/D8/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/CP/D0/D0/DD /CT/DC/D4 /CT/D2/B9/D7/CX/DA /CT /CP/D2/CS /D7/D3/D1/CT /CT/DC/CP/D1/D4/D0/CT/D7 /CW/CP /DA /CT /CQ /CT/CT/D2 /CS/D3 /CR/D9/D1/CT/D2 /D8/CT/CS /CT/D0/D7/CT/DB/CW/CT/D6/CT/CJ/BG/CL/BA/CF /CT /DB/D6/CX/D8/CT/AW/CX /BP /BT/CX /CT /CX/AI/CX/BN /B4/BJ/B5/DB/CW/CT/D6/CT /DB /CT /CS/D6/D3/D4/D4 /CT/CS /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D1/D1/D3/D2 /D8/CX/D1/CT /CU/CP/CR/D8/D3/D6 /CT /A0 /CX/AX /D8/BA /CC/CW/CT/D8/D3/D8/CP/D0 /DB /CP /DA /CT /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D7/D4/CP/CR/CT /CX/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D7/D9/D1/D1/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /CS/CX/D6/CT/CR/D8/DB /CP /DA /CT /CU/D6/D3/D1 /D8/CW/CT /D7/D3/D9/D6/CR/CT /CP/D2/CS /D8/CW/CT /D6/CP/CS/CX/CP/D8/CT/CS /DB /CP /DA /CT/D7 /CU/D6/D3/D1 /CP/D0/D0/D8/CW/CT /CQ /D3 /CS/CX/CT/D7/BA /BY /D3/D6 /CT/CP/CR /CW/D4 /CW /CP /D7 /CT /AI/CX /B8 /DB /CT /CS/CT/AC/D2/CT /CP /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /DA /CT/CR/D8/D3/D6/D7/D9/CR /CW/D8 /CW /CP /D8/DI /DA/CX /BP /CR/D3/D7 /AI/CX /DI /CT/DC /B7 /D7/CX/D2 /AI/CX /DI /CT/DD /BM /B4/BK/B5/CC/CW/CX/D7 /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /DA /CT/CR/D8/D3/D6 /CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /D4/D0/CP/CR/CT/CS /D3/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D6/CT/D7/D4 /CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/CT /D2 /D8/CX/D8 /DD/CP/D2/CS /D4/D9/D8 /D3/D2 /CP /BE/BW /D4/D0/CP/D2/CT /D7/D4/CP/D2/D2/CT/CS /CQ /DD /DI /CT/DC /BN/DI /CT/DD /BA /CC/CW/CT /CP/D1/D4/D0/CX/D8/D9/CS/CT/BT/CX /D6/CT/CU/CT/D6/D7 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CS/CX/D7/D8/D6/CX/CQ/D9/D8/CT/CS /CP/D1/D3/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7/BA/C6/D9/D1/CT/D6/CX/CR/CP/D0 /CR/D3/D1/D4/D9/D8/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CW/CP/D7 /CQ /CT/CT/D2 /CR/CP/D6/D6/CX/CT/CS /D3/D9/D8 /CU/D3/D6 /BD/BW/B8/BE/BW /CP/D2/CS /BF/BW /D7/CX/D8/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7 /D6/CT/D7/D4 /CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/D0/DD /BA /CC/CW/CT /D6/CT/D7/D9/D0/D8/D7 /CP/D6/CT /D7/D9/D1/B9/D1/CP/D6/CX/DE/CT/CS /CP/D7 /CU/D3/D0/D0/D3 /DB/D7/BA /B4/BD/B5 /C1/D2 /D8/CW/CT /BE /CP/D2/CS /BF /CS/CX/D1/CT/D2/D7/CX/D3/D2/CP/D0 /CR/CP/D7/CT/D7/B8/CU/D3/D6 /D7/D9Æ/CR/CX/CT/D2 /D8 /D0/CP/D6/CV/CT /CR/D3/D9/D4/D0/CX/D2/CV /D7/D8/D6/CT/D2/CV/D8/CW /BV /CP/D2/CS /CT/D2/D3/D9/CV/CW /CS/CT/D2/B9/D7/CX/D8 /DD /D3/CU /CQ /D3 /CS/CX/CT/D7 /CQ/D9/D8 /D7/D1/CP/D0/D0 /CS/CP/D1/D4/CX/D2/CV /CU/CP/CR/D8/D3/D6/B8 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CX/D7/D8/D6/CP/D4/D4 /CT/CS /CX/D2/D7/CX/CS/CT /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1 /CU/D3/D6 /CP /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT /D3/CU /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/CX/CT/D7 /D0/D3/B9/CR/CP/D8/CT/CS /CP/CQ /D3 /DA /CT/D8 /CW /CT /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /BA /C5/D3/D6/CT /CT/DC/D4/D0/CX/CR/CX/D8/D0/DD /B8 /CP/D8 /CP/CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT/B8 /D8/CW/CT /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/D1/CX/D8/D8/CT/CS /DB /CP /DA /CT /CU/D6/D3/D1 /D8/CW/CT/CT/DC/CR/CX/D8/CX/D2/CV /D7/D3/D9/D6/CR/CT /CX/D7 /D0/D3 /CR/CP/D0/CX/DE/CT/CS /CX/D2/D7/CX/CS/CT /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/BA /CC/CW/CT/D6/CT /CX/D7 /D2/D3/CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /AD/D3 /DB/B8 /CP/D7 /D7/D9/D4/D4 /D3/D6/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD /D8/CW/CT /CP/D4/D4 /CT/CP/D6/CP/D2/CR/CT /D3/CU /CP /CV/D0/D3/CQ/CP/D0/CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /DA /CT/CR/D8/D3/D6/D7 /CS/CT/AC/D2/CT/CS /CP/CQ /D3 /DA /CT/B8 /CX/BA /CT/BA /CP/D0/D0/D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /DA /CT/CR/D8/D3/D6/D7 /D4/D3 /CX /D2 /D8 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /D7/CP/D1/CT /CS/CX/D6/CT/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CP/D2/CS /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /AI/CX/D7 /CR/D3/D2/D7/D8/CP/D2 /D8/BA /B4/BE/B5 /CF/CW/CT/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CS/CP/D1/D4/CX/D2/CV /CX/D2/CR/D6/CT/CP/D7/CT/D7/B8 /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CU/CT/D6/B9/D6/CX/D2/CV /D1/D3/D6/CT /CP/D2/CS /D1/D3/D6/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /D8/D3 /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6 /CU/D3/D6/D1/D7/B8 /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT/D4/CW/CT/D2/D3/D1/CT/D2/D3/D2 /D7/D8/CP/D6/D8/D7 /D8/D3 /CS/CX/D7/CP/D4/D4 /CT/CP/D6 /CV/D6/CP/CS/D9/CP/D0/D0/DD /BA /B4/BF/B5 /BW/CT/CR/D6/CT/CP/D7/B9/CX/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /CS/CT/D2/D7/CX/D8 /DD /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D2/D7/D8/CX/D8/D9/CT/D2 /D8/D7 /CP/D0/D7/D3 /CP/D0/D0/D3 /DB/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD/D8/D3 /CQ/CT /D6/CT/D0/CT/CP/D7/CT/CS /CU/D6/D3/D1 /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/B8 /D1/CT/CP/D2 /DB/CW/CX/D0/CT /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/B9/CT/D2/CR/CT /CS/CX/D7/CP/D4/D4 /CT/CP/D6/BA /BT/D2/D3/D8/CW/CT/D6 /CT/AB/CT/CR/D8 /D3/CU /CS/CT/CR/D6/CT/CP/D7/CX/D2/CV /CS/CT/D2/D7/CX/D8 /DD /CX/D7/D8/D3 /D2/CP/D6/D6/D3 /DB /D8/CW/CT /D8/D6/CP/D4/D4/CX/D2/CV /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT/BA /B4/BG/B5 /C7/D9/D8/D7/CX/CS/CT /D8/CW/CT/D8/D6/CP/D4/D4/CX/D2/CV /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT/B8 /D2/D3 /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/CS /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT/D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/BA /CC/CW/CT/D6/CT/CU/D3/D6/CT /CP/CS/CY/D9/D7/D8/CX/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /DB/CX/D0/D0 /CR/D6/D9/CR/CX/CP/D0/D0/DD/D8/D9/D2/CT /DB/CW/CT/D8/CW/CT/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1 /CR/CP/D2 /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /BA /B4/BH/B5 /BY /D3/D6 /BD/BW/CR/CP/D7/CT/D7/B8 /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CX/D7 /D8/D6/CP/D4/D4 /CT/CS /D2/CT/CP/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D7/D3/D9/D6/CR/CT /CU/D3/D6 /CP/D0/D0 /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/B9/CR/CX/CT/D7 /DB/CX/D8/CW /CP/D2 /DD/CV /CX /DA /CT/D2 /CP/D1/D3/D9/D2 /D8 /D3/CU /D6/CP/D2/CS/D3/D1 /D4/D0/CP/CR/CT/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D3 /CU /D8 /CW /CT/CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7/BA /B4/BI/B5 /C4/CP/D7/D8/B8 /D4 /CT/D6/CW/CP/D4/D7 /D1/D3/D7/D8 /CX/D1/D4 /D3/D6/D8/CP/D2 /D8/D0/DD /B8 /CP/D0/D0 /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT/CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /CP/D6/CT /D2/D3/D8 /D7/CT/D2/D7/CX/D8/CX/DA /CT /D8/D3 /CP/D2 /DD /D4/CP/D6/D8/CX/CR/D9/D0/CP/D6 /CS/CX/D7/D8/D6/CX/CQ/D9/D8/CX/D3/D2/D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D2/D7/D8/CX/D8/D9/CT/D2 /D8/D7/BA /C1/D2 /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6 /DB /D3/D6/CS/D7/B8 /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /D6/CT/D1/CP/CX/D2/D9/D2/CR /CW/CP/D2/CV/CT/CS /CP/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D2/AC/CV/D9/D6/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1 /CX/D7 /DA /CP/D6/CX/CT/CS/BA/CC/CW/CT/D7/CT /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /CP/D6/CT /CX/D0/D0/D9/D7/D8/D6/CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD /CP /BE/BW /D7/CX/D8/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D7/CW/D3 /DB/D2/CX/D2 /BY/CX/CV/BA /BE /C0/CT/D6/CT /CX/D7 /D7/CW/D3 /DB/D2 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D2/D3 /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CX/D7 /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/CS /CU/D3/D6 /CU/BP /CU/BC /BP/BC /BM /BK/BK/BE/BF/BH /CP/D2/CS /BH/BA/BK/BK/BE/BG/B8 /CQ/D9/D8 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CQ /CT/CR/D3/D1/CT/D7 /D8/D6/CP/D4/D4 /CT/CS /CU/D3/D6/CU/BP /CU/BC /BP/BD /BM /BL/BI/BC/BK/BA /BV/D0/CT/CP/D6/D0/DD /D8/CW/CT/D6/CT /CP/D6/CT /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /D8/D6/CP/D2/D7/CX/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7 /CU/D6/D3/D1/CU/BP /CU/BC /BP/BC /BM /BK/BK/BE/BF/BH /D8/D3 /BD/BA/BL/BI/BC/BK/B8 /CP/D2/CS /CU/D6/D3/D1 /BD/BA/BL/BI/BC/BK /D8/D3 /BH/BA/BK/BK/BE/BG/BA /CF /CT /D7/D8/D6/CT/D7/D7 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /CS/D3 /D2/D3/D8 /D6/CT/D5/D9/CX/D6/CT /D5/D9/CP/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /D3/D6/CX/CV/CX/D2/BA/C0/CT/D6/CT /CU/BC /D6/CT/CU/CT/D6/D7 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /BA y x −600f/f0 = 0.88235 y x −600f/f0 = 1.9608 y x −600f/f0 = 5.8824−5000500 −5000500−2−10123 xyLog[Energy] −5000500 −5000500−15−10−50 xyLog[Energy] −5000500 −5000500−2024 xyLog[Energy]/BY/C1/BZ/BA /BE/BA /BX/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CS/CX/D7/D8/D6/CX/CQ/D9/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CP/D2/CS /CS/CX/CP/CV/D6/CP/D1/D7 /CU/D3/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT/DA /CT/CR/D8/D3/D6/D7 /CX/D2 /CP /BE/BW /D6/CP/D2/CS/D3/D1 /CR/D3/D2/AC/CV/D9/D6/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA /CA/CX/CV/CW /D8/BM /BX/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CS/CX/D7/D8/D6/CX/B9/CQ/D9/D8/CX/D3/D2/BN /D8/CW/CT /CV/CT/D3/D1/CT/D8/D6/CX/CR/CP/D0 /CU/CP/CR/D8/D3/D6 /CW/CP/D7 /CQ /CT/CT/D2 /D7/CR/CP/D0/CT/CS /D3/D9/D8/BA /C4/CT/CU/D8/BM /D8/CW/CT/D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /CS/CX/CP/CV/D6/CP/D1/D7 /CU/D3/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D4/CW/CP/D7/CT /DA /CT/CR/D8/D3/D6/D7/BA/C6/D3 /DB/DB /CT /CP/D6/CT /D6/CT/CP/CS/DD /D8/D3 /CS/CX/D7/CR/D9/D7/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D0/CX/D2/CZ /CP/CV/CT /D8/D3 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/B9/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA /BT/D0/D8/CW/D3/D9/CV/CW /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /D1/CP /DD/CQ /CT /D8/CW/CT /D1/D3/D7/D8 /CR/D3/D1/D4/D0/CT/DC /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/B8 /D7/D8/CX/D0/D0 /D7/CT/DA /CT/D6/CP/D0 /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CP/D0 /D3/CQ/D7/CT/D6/DA /CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7 /B4/CS/D3/CV/D1/CP/D7/B5/CR/CP/D2 /CQ/CT /D7/D8/CP/D8/CT/CS/BA /BY/CX/D6/D7/D8/B8 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CX/D7 /CP /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1 /D3/CU /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ/D3/CS /DD /BA/BT/D2 /DD /D7/CX/D2/CV/D0/CT /D2/CT/D9/D6/D3/D2 /D7/CW/D3/D9/D0/CS /D2/D3/D8 /CQ /CT /D7/CX/CV/D2/CX/AC/CR/CP/D2 /D8 /CU/D3/D6 /D8/CW/CT /DB/CW/D3/D0/CT/CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/B8 /CQ/D9/D8 /D6/CP/D8/CW/CT/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D4/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/D2/D7 /D3/CU /CP/CR/D8/CX/DA/CX/D8 /DD /D3/CU /CR/D0/D9/D7/D8/CT/D6/D7 /CP/D6/CT/CX/D1/D4 /D3/D6/D8/CP/D2 /D8/BA /BT/D7 /CT/CP/D6/D0/DD /CP/D7 /CX/D2 /BD/BL/BI/BJ/B8 /CA/CX/CR/CR/D0/CP/D6/CS/CX /CP/D2/CS /CD/D1/CT/DE/CP /DB /CP/AC/D6/D7/D8 /D4/D6/D3/D4 /D3/D7/CT/CS /D8/D3 /CT/DC/D4/D0/CP/CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CS/DD/D2/CP/D1/CX/CR/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D2/B9/D8/CT/DC/D8 /D3/CU /D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ /D3 /CS/DD /D8/CW/CT/D3/D6/DD /CJ/BH/CL/BA /CC/CW/CT/CX/D6 /DB /D3/D6/CZ /CW/CP/D7 /D7/D8/CX/D1 /D9/D0/CP/D8/CT/CS/CP/D2/CS /CR/D3/D2 /D8/CX/D2 /D9/CT/D7 /D8/D3 /CX/D2/D7/D4/CX/D6/CT /D1 /D9/CR /CW /D6/CT/D7/CT/CP/D6/CR /CW /CP/D0/D3/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /D0/CX/D2/CT/BA /BT/D7/D4 /CT/CR/CX/CP/D0 /CP/D6/CT/CP /CX/D2 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /D6/CT/D7/CT/CP/D6/CR /CW /CW/CP/D7 /CT/D1/CT/D6/CV/CT/CS /CP/D2/CS /CX/D7 /CZ/D2/D3 /DB/D2/CP/D7 /D5/D9/CP/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CS/DD/D2/CP/D1/CX/CR/D7 /CJ/BI/CL/BA /CB/CT/CR/D3/D2/CS/B8 /CT/DC/D4 /CT/D6/CX/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D7/CW/CP /DA /CT /CX/D2/CS/CX/CR/CP/D8/CT/CS /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT/D6/CT /CP/D6/CT /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT /D4/CW/CT/D2/D3/D1/CT/D2/CP /CX/D2/CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA /C6/CT/D9/D6/D3/D2/D7 /D3/D6 /D2/CT/D9/D6/D3/D2 /CR/D0/D9/D7/D8/CT/D6/D7 /CP/D8 /CS/CX/AB/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8/D7/D4/CP/D8/CX/CP/D0 /D4 /D3/CX/D2 /D8/D7 /CP/CR/D8 /CR/D3/D0/D0/CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/D0/DD /B8 /D4 /CT/D6/CU/D3/D6/D1/CX/D2/CV /CP /D7/D4 /CT/CR/CX/AC/CR /D8/CP/D7/CZ/BA/CB/D9/CR /CW /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT /CX/D7 /CP/D0/D7/D3 /D3/CQ/D7/CT/D6/DA /CT/CS /CU/D3/D6 /D1/CX/CR/D6/D3/D8/D9/CQ/D0/CT/D7 /CX/D2 /D2/CT/D6/DA /CT/CR/CT/D0/D0/D7 /CJ/BJ/CL /CP/D2/CS /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6 /CQ/CX/D3/D0/D3/CV/CX/CR/CP/D0 /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/D7 /CJ/BK/CL/BA /CC /D3 /CT/AB/CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/D0/DD/D4 /CT/D6/CU/D3/D6/D1/CX/D2/CV /D0/D3/D2/CV /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT /CR/D3/D0/D0/CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT /D8/CP/D7/CZ/D7 /D6/CT/D5/D9/CX/D6/CT/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D1/B9/D1 /D9/D2/CX/CR/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D8/D3 /CQ /CT /D1/CT/CS/CX/CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD/DB /CP /DA /CT/D7 /CP/D2/CS /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /D7/DD/D7/B9/D8/CT/D1 /D8/D3 /CQ /CT /CQ /D3/D7/D3/D2/B9/D0/CX/CZ /CT/BA /CD/D2/D0/CX/CZ /CT /D8/CW/CT /D4/D6/CT/DA/CX/D3/D9/D7 /D6/CT/D7/CT/CP/D6/CR /CW/B8 /CX/D8 /CX/D7/D8/CW/CT /D4/D6/CT/D7/CT/D2 /D8 /CP/D9/D8/CW/D3/D6/B3/D7 /DA/CX/CT/DB /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CX/D7 /D2/D3/D8/D3/CU /D5/D9/CP/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /D3/D6/CX/CV/CX/D2/BA /CC/CW/CX/D6/CS/B8 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /D2/D3/D8 /D3/D2/D0/DD /CP/CR/CR/D9/D1 /D9/D0/CP/D8/CT/D7/CQ/D9/D8 /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/D7 /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /B8 /CR/D3/D6/D6/CT/D7/D4 /D3/D2/CS/CX/D2/CV /D8/D3 /D0/CT/CP/D6/D2/CX/D2/CV /CP/D2/CS /D1/CT/D1/D3/D6/DD/D4/D6/D3 /CR/CT/D7/D7/CT/D7 /D6/CT/D7/D4 /CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/D0/DD /BA /BT/D7 /D1/CT/D1/D3/D6/CX/CT/D7 /CX/D2 /CP /CW/CT/CP/D0/D8/CW /DD /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/CP/D6/CT /AD/CP/D7/CW/CT/CS /CX/D2 /CP /D6/CT/CV/D9/D0/CP/D6 /D4/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6/D2/B8 /CX/D8 /CX/D7 /D6/CT/CP/D7/D3/D2/CP/CQ/D0/CT /D8/D3 /CQ/CT /B9/BF/D0/CX/CT/DA /CT /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT /D1/CT/D1/D3/D6/DD /CP/D7 /CP /CU/D3/D6/D1 /D3/CU /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CX/D7 /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/CS /CX/D2/CP /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /D1/CP/D2/D2/CT/D6/BA /BY /D6/DJ /D3/D0/CX/CR /CW/DB /CP/D7 /D8/CW/CT /AC/D6/D7/D8 /D8/D3 /D0/CX/D2/CZ /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD/D7/D8/D3/D6/CP/CV/CT /DB/CX/D8/CW /D0/D3/D2/CV /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT /CX/D2 /CR/CT/D6/D8/CP/CX/D2 /CQ/CX/D3/D0/D3/CV/CX/CR/CP/D0/D7/D8/D6/D9/CR/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /CJ/BK/CL/BA /BY /D3/D9/D6/D8/CW/B8 /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CR/CP/D2 /D6/CT/D7/CX/D7/D8 /D6/CT/CP/B9/D7/D3/D2/CP/CQ/D0/CT /CS/CP/D1/CP/CV/CT/D7 /DB/CW/CX/CR /CW /D1/CP /DD /CR/CP/D9/D7/CT /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /D7/D8/D6/D9/CR/D8/D9/D6/CT/D8/D3 /CS/CX/D7/D0/D3 /CR/CP/D8/CT /D8/D3 /CP /D6/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/CP/D0 /CT/DC/D8/CT/D2 /D8/BA /CC/CW/CX/D7 /CX/D1/D4/D0/CX/CT/D7 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT/CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CR/CP/D2 /CQ/CT /CT/DC/CT/CR/D9/D8/CT/CS /CX/D2 /D6/CT/D0/CP/D8/CX/DA /CT/D0/DD /CS/CX/D7/D3/D6/CS/CT/D6/CT/CS/CT/D2 /DA/CX/D6/D3/D2/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D7/BA /C4/CP/D7/D8/D0/DD /B8 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CR/CP/D2 /CP/CV/CT/B8 /D0/D3/D7/CX/D2/CV /D1/CT/D1/D3/D6/DD /CP/D2/CS/CQ /CT/CR/D3/D1/CX/D2/CV /CS/DD/CX/D2/CV/BA/BT/D0/D0 /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT /CX/D1/D4 /D3/D6/D8/CP/D2 /D8 /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/D7 /D3/CU /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CR/CP/D2 /CQ/CT /DB /CT/D0/D0 /CT/DC/B9/D4/D0/CP/CX/D2/CT/CS /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D6/CT/CP/D0/D1 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /CP/CQ /D3 /DA /CT /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CX/CR /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D0/BA /BT/D0/B9/D8/CW/D3/D9/CV/CW /CX/D8 /CX/D7 /D2/D3/D8 /D4 /D3/D7/D7/CX/CQ/D0/CT /D8/D3 /CS/CX/D7/CR/CT/D6/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CT/DC/CP/CR/D8 /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /D8/CW/CP/D8/CR/CP/D6/D6/DD /D3/D9/D8 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CP/D8 /D8/CW/CX/D7 /D7/D8/CP/CV/CT/B8 /CP /CU/CT/DB /D4 /D3/D7/D7/CX/CQ/CX/D0/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /CW/CP /DA /CT /CQ /CT/CT/D2 /D1/CT/D2 /D8/CX/D3/D2/CT/CS /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D0/CX/D8/CT/D6/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/B8 /D7/D9/CR /CW /CP/D7 /D2/CT/D9/D6/D3/D2/D7 /D3/D6/CR/D3/D6/D8/CX/CR/D3/D2/D7/B8 /D4/D6/D3/D8/CT/CX/D2/D7 /CX/D2 /D1/CX/CR/D6/D3/D8/D9/CQ/D9/D0/CT/D7 /CP/D2/CS /D7/D3 /D3/D2/BA /BX/DA /CT/D2 /DB /CP/D8/CT/D6/D1/D3/D0/CT/CR/D9/D0/CT/D7 /CP/D6/CT /CP/D0/D7/D3 /D1/CT/D2 /D8/CX/D3/D2/CT/CS /CP/D7 /CP /CR/D3/D6/CT /D6/D3/D0/CT /CX/D2 /D1/CT/D1/D3/D6/CX/DE/CX/D2/CV/CP/D2/CS /D7/D8/D3/D6/CX/D2/CV/BA /C8/D9/D8/D8/CX/D2/CV /CS/CT/D8/CP/CX/D0/D7 /CP/D7/CX/CS/CT/B8 /DB/CW/CP/D8 /CX/D7 /CX/D1/D4 /D3/D6/D8/CP/D2 /D8/CX /D7/D3/D2/D0/DD /CP /D5/D9/CP/D2/D8/CX/D8/DD /D7/D3/D1/CT/CW/D3 /DB /D6/CT/D0/CP/D8/CT/CS /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /CP/CR/D8/CX/DA/CX/D8 /DD /D3/CU /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/BA/BT/CR/D8/D9/CP/D0/D0/DD /B8/CX /D8/CX /D7 /CZ /D2 /D3 /DB/D2 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D2/CT/D9/D6/D3/D2/D7 /CS/D3 /D2/D3/D8 /D7/CT/CT/D1 /D8/D3 /CQ /CT /D8/CW/CT/D3/D2/D0/DD /CU/D9/D2/CS/CP/D1/CT/D2 /D8/CP/D0 /D9/D2/CX/D8/D7 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/BN /D3/D6/B8 /CP/D8 /D0/CT/CP/D7/D8/B8 /D8/D3/CV/CT/D8/CW/CT/D6/DB/CX/D8/CW /D8/CW/CT/D1 /D7/D3/D1/CT /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6 /CT/D0/CT/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D7/B8 /CP/D7 /CU/D3/D6 /CX/D2/D7/D8/CP/D2/CR/CT /CV/D0/CX/CP /CR /CT/D0 /D0/CT/D7 /B8/D1/CP /DD /D4/D0/CP /DD /CP/D2 /CX/D1/D4 /D3/D6/D8/CP/D2 /D8 /D6/D3/D0/CT /CJ/BL/CL/BA /C6/D3 /D1/CP/D8/D8/CT/D6 /DB/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT/DD/CT/DC/CP/CR/D8/D0/DD /CP/D6/CT/B8 /D8/CW/CT /D2/CT/CR/CT/D7/D7/CX/D8 /DD /CU/D3/D6 /D7/D8/CP/CQ/CX/D0/CX/D8 /DD /D6/CT/D5/D9/CX/D6/CT/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CR/D3/D2/B9/D7/D8/CX/D8/D9/CT/D2 /D8/D7 /D8/D3 /CU/D3/D0/D0/D3 /DB/CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /CT/D5/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/BA /CC/CW/CT /CR/D3/D1/D1 /D9/D2/CX/CR/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/CQ/CT /D8 /DB /CT/CT/D2 /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /D7/CW/D3/D9/D0/CS /CQ /CT /D1/CT/CS/CX/CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD/DB /CP /DA /CT/D7 /D8/D3 /CT/D2/D7/D9/D6/CT/CT/AB/CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT /CX/D2/CU/D3/D6/D1/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CT/DC/CR /CW/CP/D2/CV/CT/BA /BU/CP/D7/CT/CS /D3/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CP/CQ /D3 /DA /CT/D6 /CT /B9/D7/D9/D0/D8/D7/B8 /DB /CT /CP/D6/CV/D9/CT /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CR/D3/D2/D7/CX/D7/D8/D7 /D3/CU /D1/CP/D2 /DD /D7/D9/CQ/D7/CT/D8/D7 /D3/CU/CC /DD/D4 /CT /C1 /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7/B8 /CT/CP/CR /CW /D7/D9/CQ/D7/CT/D8 /CW/CP/D7 /CS/CX/AB/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CP/D0 /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/B9/CR/CX/CT/D7/B8 /CP/D2/CS /CP/CR/CR/D3/D1/D4/D0/CX/D7/CW/CT/D7 /CS/CX/AB/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /CS/D9/D8/CX/CT/D7/BA /BW/CX/AB/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /D7/D9/CQ/D7/CT/D8/D7/DB/CX/D0/D0 /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT /D7/D4 /CT/CR/CX/AC/CR /CX/D2/CU/D3/D6/D1/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CS/CT/D4 /CT/D2/CS/CX/D2/CV /D3/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D7/D4 /CT/CR/D8/D6/CP/D3/CU /CT/DC/D8/CT/D6/D2/CP/D0 /D7/D8/CX/D1 /D9/D0/CX/BA /C7/D2/CR/CT /D8/CW/CT /D7/D8/CX/D1 /D9/D0/CX /AC/D8/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/D3 /CP /D8/D6/CP/D4/D4/CX/D2/CV/D6/CP/D2/CV/CT /D3/CU /CP /D7/D4 /CT/CR/CX/AC/CR /D7/D9/CQ/D7/CT/D8/B8 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /D3/CU /CR /CW/CP/D6/CP/CR/D8/CT/D6/D7 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT/D7/D8/CX/D1 /D9/D0/CX /DB/CX/D0/D0 /CQ /CT /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/CS /D3/D6 /CX/D1/D4/D6/CX/D2 /D8/CT/CS /CX/D2 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D7/D9/CQ/D7/CT/D8 /CX/D2 /CP/CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /D1/CP/D2/D2/CT/D6/B8 /CP/D7 /CX/D2/CS/CX/CR/CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD/BY /CX /CV /BA /BE /BA /C1/D2 /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6 /DB /D3/D6/CS/D7/B8/CS/CX/AB/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /D7/D9/CQ/D7/CT/D8/D7 /D6/CT/D7/D4 /D3/D2/D7/CT /D8/D3 /D6/CT/D7/D4 /CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT /D7/D8/CX/D1 /D9/D0/CX /CP/D2/CS /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CP/CR/CR/D3/D6/CS/CX/D2/CV/D0/DD /B8 /CR/D3/D6/D6/CT/D7/D4 /D3/D2/CS/CX/D2/CV /D8/D3 /D0/CT/CP/D6/D2/CX/D2/CV /CP/D2/CS /D1/CT/D1/B9/D3/D6/DD /D4/D6/D3 /CR/CT/D7/D7/CT/D7/BA /CF/CW/CT/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CS/CT/D2/D7/CX/D8 /DD /D3/CU /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /CX/D7 /D2/D3/D8 /CW/CX/CV/CW/CT/D2/D3/D9/CV/CW /D3/D6 /D8/CW/CT/D6/CT /CX/D7 /D2/D3 /CT/D2/D3/D9/CV/CW /CP/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7/B8 /CW/D3 /DB /CT/DA /CT/D6/B8/D8/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CR/CP/D2/D2/D3/D8 /CQ /CT /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/CS /CU/D3/D6 /D0/D3/D2/CV /D8/CX/D1/CT/BA /CC/CW/CX/D7 /D6/CT/DA /CT/CP/D0/D7/CP/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D7/CX/D8/D9/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D3/CU /D7/CW/D3/D6/D8 /D1/CT/D1/D3/D6/DD/BN /D8/CW/CX/D7 /D1/CP /DD/CQ /CT /D7/CT/CT/D2/B8 /CU/D3/D6/CT/DC/CP/D1/D4/D0/CT/B8 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /CT/CP/D6/D0/DD /CS/CT/DA /CT/D0/D3/D4/D1/CT/D2 /D8 /D3/CU /CR /CW/CX/D0/CS/D6/CT/D2/B3/D7 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/D7/BA/C4/D3/D2/CV /D8/CT/D6/D1 /D1/CT/D1/D3/D6/DD /D6/CT/D5/D9/CX/D6/CT/D7 /D7/D9Æ/CR/CX/CT/D2 /D8 /CP/D1/D3/D9/D2 /D8 /D3/CU /CP/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /CP/D2/CS /D6/CT/CP/D7/D3/D2/CP/CQ/D0/CT /D7/D9/D4/D4/D0/DD /D3/CU /D7/D8/CX/D1 /D9/D0/CX/BA /C5/D3/D6/CT/D3 /DA /CT/D6/B8 /CP/D7/D1/CT/D2 /D8/CX/D3/D2/CT/CS /CP/CQ /D3 /DA /CT/B8 /D8/CW/CT /CU/CT/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT /D3/CU /D0/D3/D2/CV /D6/CP/D2/CV/CT /CR/D3/CW/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT /CP/D2/CS/CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /D7/D8/D3/D6/CP/CV/CT /D6/CT/D1/CP/CX/D2/D7 /D9/D2/CR /CW/CP/D2/CV/CT/CS /CP/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8 /DD /CR/D3/D2/AC/CV/D9/B9/D6/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /DA /CP/D6/CX/CT/D7/BN /CW/CT/D6/CT /DB /CT /CT/DC/CR/D0/D9/CS/CT /D8/CW/CT /CT/DC/D8/D6/CT/D1/CT /CR/CP/D7/CT /D8/CW/CP/D8 /CP/D0/D0/CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /CR/D3/D0/D0/CP/D4/D7/CT /CX/D2 /D8/D3 /CT/CP/CR /CW /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6/BA /CC/CW/CX/D7 /DB /D3/D9/D0/CS /CT/DC/D4/D0/CP/CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT/CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/B3/D7 /D6/CT/D7/CX/D7/D8/CP/D2/CR/CT /D8/D3 /D6/CT/CP/D7/D3/D2/CP/CQ/D0/CT /CS/CP/D1/CP/CV/CT/D7/BA /BW/CP/D1/CP/CV/CT/D7 /D1/CP /DD/D6/CT/CS/D9/CR/CT /D8/CW/CT /CP/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/CT /D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /CP/D2/CS /CP/D0/D8/CT/D6 /D8/CW/CT /D7/D8/D6/D9/CR/D8/D9/D6/CT /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT/D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/BA /BX/CX/D8/CW/CT/D6 /DA /CP/D6/DD/CX/D2/CV /D8/CW/CT /D2 /D9/D1 /CQ /CT/D6 /D3/CU /CP/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/CT /D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /D3/D6/D8/CW/CT /D2/CP/D8/D9/D6/CP/D0 /CU/D6/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2/CR/DD /D3/CU /CT/D2 /D8/CX/D8/CX/CT/D7 /D3/D6 /CQ /D3/D8/CW /D4/D6/D3 /CS/D9/CR/CT/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CS/CX/CU/B9/CU/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /D7/D8/CP/D8/CT/D7 /D3/CU /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CP/D2/CS /CR/D3/D2 /D8/D6/D3/D0/D7 /D8/CW/CT /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /D6/CT/D0/CT/CP/D7/CT/BA/C5/CT/D1/D3/D6/CX/CT/D7 /D1/CP /DD /CP/D0/D7/D3 /CQ /CT /D0/D3/D7/D8 /CP/D2/CS /CS/CX/D7/D3/D6/CX/CT/D2 /D8/CT/CS /DB/CW/CT/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D8/CW/CT/CS/CP/D1/D4/CX/D2/CV /CT/AB/CT/CR/D8 /CQ /CT/CR/D3/D1/CT/D7 /D4/D6/D3/D1/CX/D2/CT/D2 /D8/BA /CC/CW/CT /D4 /D3/D7/D7/CX/CQ/D0/CT /CR/D3/D2 /D8/D6/CX/B9/CQ/D9/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7 /D8/D3 /D8/CW/CT /CS/CP/D1/D4/CX/D2/CV /CT/AB/CT/CR/D8 /CX/D2/CR/D0/D9/CS/CT /D8/CW/CP/D8 /CP/CV/CX/D2/CV /CT/AB/CT/CR/D8/CP/D2/CS /CS/CX/D7/CT/CP/D7/CT/D7/BA /C1/CE/BA /BV/C7/C6/BV/C4/CD/BW/C1/C6/BZ /CA/BX/C5/BT/CA/C3/CB/CF/CW/CX/D0/CT /D8/CW/CT/D6/CT /CP/D6/CT /D1/CP/D2 /DD /D9/D2/CP/D2/D7/DB /CT/D6/CT/CS /D5/D9/CT/D7/D8/CX/D3/D2/D7 /D4 /CT/D6/D8/CX/B9/D2/CT/D2 /D8 /D8/D3 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CU/D9/D2/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2/B8 /D2/CT/CR/CT/D7/D7/CX/D8/CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD /D0/CX/D1/CX/D8/CT/CS /CZ/D2/D3 /DB/D0/B9/CT/CS/CV/CT /CP/CQ /D3/D9/D8 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/B8 /CX/D8 /CX/D7 /CP/D0/D1/D3/D7/D8 /CR/CT/D6/D8/CP/CX/D2 /D8/CW/CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CX/D7 /CP/D1/CP/D2 /DD /CQ /D3 /CS/DD /D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1 /DB/CW/CX/CR /CW /CR/CP/D2 /CP/CR/CR/D9/D1 /D9/D0/CP/D8/CT /CP/D2/CS /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT /CT/D2/B9/CT/D6/CV/DD /BA /CF/CW/CT/D2 /D2/CT/CT/CS/CT/CS/B8 /D8/CW/CT /D7/D8/D3/D6/CT/CS /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /CR/CP/D2 /CQ /CT /D6/CT/D0/CT/CP/D7/CT/CS /D8/D3/CP/CR/CR/D3/D1/D4/D0/CX/D7/CW /D1/CX/D7/D7/CX/D3/D2/D7/BA /CC/CW/CT /CR/D3/D1/D1 /D9/D2/CX/CR/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CQ/CT /D8 /DB /CT/CT/D2 /CS/CX/CU/B9/CU/CT/D6/CT/D2 /D8 /D4/CP/D6/D8/D7 /CX/D2 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2 /CX/D7 /D0/CX/CZ /CT/D0/DD /D1/CT/CS/CX/CP/D8/CT/CS /CQ /DD /CR/CT/D6/D8/CP/CX/D2 /CQ/D6/CP/CX/D2/DB /CP /DA /CT/D7/B8 /CP/D7 /D2/D3 /D3/D8/CW/CT/D6 /D1/CT/CP/D2/D7 /CR/CP/D2 /CR/D3/D2 /DA /CT/DD /CX/D2/CU/D3/D6/D1/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D1/D3/D6/CT/CT/AB/CT/CR/D8/CX/DA /CT/D0/DD /D8/CW/CP/D2 /DB /CP /DA /CT/D7/BA /BT/D7 /D0/D3/D2/CV /CP/D7 /D8/CW/CT/D7/CT /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CP/D0 /CS/CX/D7/CR/CT/D6/D2/B9/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D7 /CW/D3/D0/CS/B8 /CV/CX/DA /CT/D2 /CX/D8/D7 /CV/CT/D2/CT/D6/CP/D0/CX/D8 /DD /D8/CW/CT /D4/D6/CT/D7/CT/D2 /D8 /D1/D3 /CS/CT/D0 /CT/DC/D4 /CT/CR/D8/D7/D8/D3 /D4/D0/CP /DD /CP /D6/D3/D0/CT /CX/D2 /CV/D9/CX/CS/CX/D2/CV /D3/D6 /D7/D8/CX/D1 /D9/D0/CP/D8/CX/D2/CV /CU/D9/D6/D8/CW/CT/D6 /CT/DC/D4 /CT/D6/CX/D1/CT/D2/B9/D8/CP/D0 /CP/D2/CS /D8/CW/CT/D3/D6/CT/D8/CX/CR/CP/D0 /D7/D8/D9/CS/CX/CT/D7/BA/BT/CR /CZ/D2/D3 /DB/D0/CT/CS/CV/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D7/BA /CC/CW/CT /DB /D3/D6/CZ /D6/CT/CR/CT/CX/DA /CT/CS /D7/D9/D4/D4 /D3/D6/D8 /CU/D6/D3/D1/C6/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/CP/D0 /CB/CR/CX/CT/D2/CR/CT /BV/D3/D9/D2/CR/CX/D0 /D8/CW/D6/D3/D9/CV/CW /D8/CW/CT /CV/D6/CP/D2 /D8/D7 /C6/CB/BV/BK/BL/B9/BE/BD/BD/BE/B9/C5/BC/BC/BK/B9/BC/BC/BK /CP/D2/CS /D8/CW/D6/D3/D9/CV/CW /BW/D6/BA /C0/BA /BV/BA /C4/CT/CT /B4/C6/CB/BV/BK/BL/B9/BE/BK/BD/BI/B9/C5/BC/BC/BK/B9/BC/BC/BF/B9/BJ/B5/BA/BR/CC/CW/CX/D7 /D4/CP/D4 /CT/D6 /CX/D7 /CQ/CP/D7/CT/CS /D3/D2 /CP /D8/CP/D0/CZ /CV/CX/DA /CT/D2 /CP/D8 /D8/CW/CT /CB/CT/CR/D3/D2/CS/BV/D6/D3/D7/D7 /CC /CP/CX/DB /CP/D2 /CB/D8/D6/CP/CX/D8 /BU/CX/D3/D0/D3/CV/DD /C1/D2/D7/D4/CX/D6/CT/CS /CC/CW/CT/D3/D6/CT/D8/CX/CR/CP/D0 /CB/D8/D9/CS/B9/CX/CT/D7 /B4/BU/C1/CC/CB/B5 /DB /D3/D6/CZ/D7/CW/D3/D4/B8 /BU/CT/CX/CY/CX/D2/CV/B8 /C5/CP /DD /BD/BK/B8 /BE/BC/BC/BC/BA /CC/CW/CT /CP/D9/D8/CW/D3/D6/D8/CW/CP/D2/CZ/D7 /D8/CW/CT /D3/D6/CV/CP/D2/CX/DE/CT/D6/D7 /CU/D3/D6 /CZ/CX/D2/CS /CW/D3/D7/D4/CX/D8/CP/D0/CX/D8 /DD /BA /CJ/BD/CL /C0/BA /CD/D1/CT/DE/CP /DB /CP/B8 /BT /CS/DA/CP/D2/CR /CT /CS /AC/CT/D0/CS /D8/CW/CT /D3/D6/DD /B8 /B4/BT/C1/C8 /B8 /C6/CT/DB /CH /D3/D6/CZ/B8/BD/BL/BL/BH/B5/BA/CJ/BE/CL /BX/BA /C0/D3/D7/CZ/CX/D2/D7/D3/D2 /CP/D2/CS /CI/BA /CH /CT/B8 /C8/CW /DD/D7/BA /CA/CT/DA/BA /C4/CT/D8/D8/BA /BK/BF /B8 /BE/BJ/BF/BG /B4/BD/BL/BL/BL/B5/BA/CJ/BF/CL /BW/BA /C2/BA /BZ/D6/CXÆ/D8/CW/D7/B8 /C1/D2/D8/D6 /D3 /CS/D9/CR/D8/CX/D3/D2 /D8/D3 /CT/D0/CT /CR/D8/D6 /D3 /CS/DD/D2/CP/D1/CX/CR/D7 /B8 /B4/C8/D6/CT/D2 /D8/CX/CR/CT/C0/CP/D0/D0 /C1/D2 /D8/CT/D6/D2/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2/CP/D0/B8 /CC /D3/CZ/DD /D3/B8 /BD/BL/BL/BL/B5/BA/CJ/BG/CL /BT/BA /BT/D0/DA /CP/D6/CT/DE/B8 /BV/BA /BV/BA /CF /CP/D2/CV/B8 /CP/D2/CS /CI/BA /CH /CT/B8 /C2/BA /BV/D3/D1/D4/BA /C8/CW /DD/D7/BA /BD/BH/BG /B8/BE/BF/BD/B8 /B4/BD/BL/BL/BL/B5/BA/CJ/BH/CL /C4/BA /C5/BA /CA/CX/CR/CR/D0/CP/D6/CS/CX /CP/D2/CS /C0/BA /CD/D1/CT/DE/CP /DB /CP/B8 /C3/DD/CQ /CT/D6/D2/CT/D8/CX/CR/D7 /BG /B8 /BG/BG/B4/BD/BL/BI/BJ/B5/BA/CJ/BI/CL /C5/BA /C2/CX/CQ/D9 /CP/D2/CS /C3/BA /CH /CP/D7/D9/CT/B8 /C9/D9/CP/D2/D8/D9/D1 /CQ/D6 /CP/CX/D2 /CS/DD/D2/CP/D1/CX/CR/D7 /CP/D2/CS /CR /D3/D2/B9/D7/CR/CX/D3/D9/D7/D2/CT/D7/D7 /B8 /B4/C2/D3/CW/D2 /BU/CT/D2/CY/CP/D1/CX/D2/D7/B8 /C8/CW/CX/D0/CP/CS/CT/D0/D4/CW/CX/CP/B8 /BD/BL/BL/BH/B5/BA/CJ/BJ/CL /C5/BA /C2/CX/CQ/D9/B8 /CT/D8 /CP/D0/BA/B8 /BU/CX/D3/D7/DD/D7/D8/CT/D1/D7 /BF/BE /B8 /BD/BL/BH /B4/BD/BL/BL/BG/B5/BN /D6/CT/CU/CT/D6/CT/D2/CR/CT/D7/D8/CW/CT/D6/CT/CX/D2/BA/CJ/BK/CL /C0/BA /BY /D6/DJ /D3/D0/CX/CR /CW/B8 /C1/D2 /D8/BA /C2/BA /C9/D9/CP/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /BV/CW/CT/D1/BA /BE /B8 /BI/BG/BD /B4/BD/BL/BI/BL/B5/BN /C6/CP/D8/D9/D6/CT/BE/BE/BK /B8 /B4/BD/BL/BJ/BC/B5/BN /C8/CW /DD/D7/BA /C4/CT/D8/D8/D7 /BH/BD /BT /B8 /BE/BD /B4/BD/BL/BJ/BH/B5/BA/CJ/BL/CL /BY/BA /C7/BA /CB/CR /CW/D1/CX/D8/D8/B8 /C6/CT/DB /CB/CR/CX/CT/D2 /D8/CX/D7/D8/B8 /BE/BF /B8 /BI/BG/BF /B4/BD/BL/BI/BI/B5/BA/BG

- 1 -On the Arbitrary Choice Regarding Which Inertial Reference Frame is "Stationary" and Which is "Moving" in the Special Theory of Relativity Douglas M. Snyder Los Angeles, CA The relativity of simultaneity is central to the special theory, and it is the basis for the other results of the special theory. It is the relativity of simultaneity that fundamentally distinguishes the special theory from Newtonian mechanics and the kinematics underlying it. What generally is not appreciated is that Einstein's argument on the relativity of simultaneity itself is the first result and that the argument itself is reflected in the structure and functioning of the physical world. The arbitrary nature of the decision regarding the particular inertial reference frame from which Einstein's argument on the relativity of simultaneity begins is discussed, and it is this arbitrary, or freely made, decision that is the basis for the significance of the argument of therelativity of simultaneity itself on the structure and functioning of the physicalworld. Moreover, the arbitrary choice as to the direction in which the relativity of simultaneity is argued indicates that there is a specific cognitive effect on thefunctioning of the physical world because the particular format of the argumenton the relativity of simultaneity used is freely chosen without physical or mental constraints, as none are indicated in the special theory. The paper approaches the role of the relativity of simultaneity in the special theory through a gedankenexperiment known as the twin paradox and, more generally, in terms of the relation between temporal durations of an occurrence and the spatial lengths of physical existents in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. The argument concerning the relativity of simultaneity leads to an interesting conundrum regarding light, a conundrum that serves to make more explicit the importance of the argument on the relativity of simultaneity to the structure and functioningof the physical world in the special theory. The general lack of two-way empirical tests in the special theory (i.e., tests in which each of the two inertial reference frames is considered the "stationary" reference frame, the reference frame in which the argument on the relativity of simultaneity begins, in a scenario) is discussed. Two examples of other kinds of tests which have been conducted are discussed and contrasted with a proposed two-way test.On the Arbitrary Choice - 2 -1. The Twin Paradox A gedankenexperiment known as the twin paradox has attracted much attention since Einstein proposed the special theory of relativity. Essentially, inthe twin paradox one of a pair of twins, who are both originally on earth, travels in a spaceship away from the earth with constant velocity in a rectilinear manner and without rotation. After traveling away from the earth, the spaceship makes an abrupt 180 o turn and returns to earth. The question asked in the paradox is: Which twin is younger and which is older upon the return of the spaceship to earth? According to a popular phrase conveying a fundamentalresult of the special theory of relativity, moving clocks run slower. Thus, as each of the twins considers for the most part himself or herself at rest and his orher sibling moving in a uniform, rectilinear manner relative to him or her, each sibling would apparently expect to find the other sibling younger than he or shewhen the spaceship returns to earth. The "moving" sibling finds himself or herself aging in accordance with the time measured by the "moving" clocks, and thus this sibling would age slower. In fact, according to Feynman, Leighton, and Sands, the biological aging processes in the "moving" sibling or the "stationary" sibling themselves could be considered clocks at rest in the respective inertial reference frames in which each of the siblings is at rest. The underlying principle in this apparent paradox is that for two inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another, it is arbitrary in the special theory which inertial frame is considered the "stationary"frame and which the "moving" frame for deducing the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations for these inertial reference frames. (As the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations are dependent on the relativity ofsimultaneity, as will be shown, "stationary" essentially refers to the inertial reference frame where the argument concerning the relativity of simultaneity begins, where simultaneity is first established and time delineated for an inertial reference frame. "Moving" essentially refers to the other inertial reference frame where the time of the "stationary" reference frame is introduced to determine whether the criterion of simultaneity in the "moving" frame is met.) As noted, in the special theory, the Lorentz coordinate transformation equationsdepend fundamentally on the relativity of simultaneity for inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. And the relativity of simultaneity for these inertial reference frames depends on two major factors: 1) the use of the invariant and finite velocity of light in all inertial reference frames in the development of simultaneity and time in an inertialOn the Arbitrary Choice - 3 -reference frame; and 2) the principle of relativity that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames. Both factors prevent an observer at rest inone of two inertial reference frames moving in a uniform translational manner relative to each other from having a privileged view concerning the functioning of the physical world. Neither observer can rely on the motion of light to determine which inertial frame is actually moving and which stationary. And neither observer can rely on the relative velocity of the two inertial reference frames to help in this determination. As concerns the twin paradox, the attempted resolution most widely held depends on the point that only the twin in the spaceship experiences the acceleration resulting from the spaceship turning around in order to place it on acourse toward earth. Thus, there would appear to be some "objective" basis fordetermining that the twin on the spaceship was really moving. (1) As Feynman, Leighton, and Sands wrote concerning the twin paradox: So the way to state the rule is to say that the man who has felt the accelerations, who has seen things fall against the walls, and so on, is the one who would be the younger; that is the difference between them in an "absolute" sense, and it is certainly correct. (2) Various other explanations have been suggested over the years from both the special theory as well as the general theory of relativity to resolve the paradox. 1 2. A Different Gedankenexperiment Whether the attempted resolutions in fact resolve the paradox, the concern here is with a more basic scenario than the twin paradox: it is the circumstance where the spaceship continues to move away from the earth. That is, the scenario here is the spaceship does not turn around abruptly and return toearth. Essentially, this scenario involves two inertial reference frames that continue to move in a uniform translational manner relative to one another. With regard to this circumstance, one cannot, for example, attempt to rely on the acceleration of one of the frames (i.e., the one "really" moving) to distinguish the two reference frames and thus to decide which clock in its respective inertial reference frame runs slower. In the scenario of concern in this paper, what is the relation between temporal durations measured by the twins if they keep moving away from one another in a uniform translational manner? Is the twin on earth aging slower, oris the twin on the spaceship aging slower? It might seem that such questionsOn the Arbitrary Choice - 4 -are like the position of the critic in Feynman, Leighton, and Sands' discussion of the twin paradox. They wrote: [The twin paradox] is called a "paradox" only by the people who believe that the [special] principle of relativity means that all motion is relative; they say, "Heh, heh, heh from the point of view of Paul [the twin on the spaceship], can't we say that Peter was moving and should therefore appear to age more slowly? By symmetry, the only possible result is that both should be thesame age when they meet." (3) In the scenario where the twin in the spaceship does not turn around and return to earth, there is only uniform, translational motion. In the special theory, this kind of motion is clearly relative. It will be shown that the answer as to which inertial reference frame's clocks run "slower" and which "faster" depends fundamentally on the relationship between the inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity inthe special theory. The logical relationship is the key because whatever the particular relationship between the time measured by clocks at rest in their respective inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another is depends on the relativity of simultaneity. More specifically, the designation of one of the clocks as at rest in a "stationary" inertial reference frame (A) and the other clock at rest in a "moving" inertial reference frame (B) depends on the corresponding designations of A as "stationary" in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity and B as "moving" in this argument. There is nothing physical indicated in the special theory that keeps the argument concerning the relativity of simultaneity from being argued with B as the "stationary" reference frame and A as the "moving" reference frame. Indeed the relativity of simultaneity can be argued in this manner and the theoretical integrity of the special theory depends on it. If it were not possible to argue the relativity of simultaneity in this latter fashion, there would be a preferred inertial reference frame, a violation of the fundamental tenet of the special theory that inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another are equivalent with regard to the description of physical phenomena. These same points hold for the relation between temporal durations in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. This last result should not be surprising as the relationship between temporal durations depends for its explanation on the argument on the relativity ofOn the Arbitrary Choice - 5 -simultaneity. One implication of this dependence is, for example, that in the case of the twins the notion of one twin aging slower or faster than the other occurs only in the context of its particular relationship with the other twin. The context of this relationship takes the form of a logical argument that begins withthe consideration of one of the inertial reference frames in which light, having afinite and invariant velocity, is used to determine simultaneity in this reference frame (called the "stationary" frame). This same light, specifically its velocity, is then juxtaposed with the uniform translational velocity of the inertial reference frames relative to one another in order to determine whether the criterion for simultaneity in the other inertial reference frame (called the "moving" frame) is met. (Even though observers at rest in the "moving" frame measure the invariant velocity for this light as do observers in the "stationary" frame, the juxtaposition of the invariant velocity of light in the "stationary" frame with the uniform translational velocity of the inertial reference frames relative to one another is at the center of the relativity of simultaneity.) 2 As noted, one part of the answer as to which inertial frame's clocks run "slower" and which "faster" is theoretical in nature in that it involves the logical structure of the argument demonstrating the relativity of simultaneity. The otherpart of the answer appears to be concrete in nature. It depends on the fact that an observer always considers himself at rest in his inertial reference frame and considers his reference frame at rest as well. Thus, an observer in an inertial reference frame always sees himself in the "stationary" inertial reference frame. If he did not see himself as such, if he knew that he was moving, the argument concerning the relativity of simultaneity could not be argued with this observeras the "stationary" observer. We would then have absolute motion, a violation of the fundamental tenet of the special theory that for observers at rest in inertial reference frames, uniform translational motion is relative. Thus, what at first appears a concrete indication of the "stationary" reference frame in that it is experienced is in part theoretical in nature. It is in part theoretical because the observer's concrete experience of being at rest in his inertial reference frame, and seeing his frame as "stationary," while obtaining empirical results consistent with his being in the "stationary" reference frame which are in agreement with the special theory, depends for its explanation on the argument demonstrating the relativity of simultaneity. The relationship between temporal durations in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another has been addressed briefly. A similar question concerning the spatial length of some physicalOn the Arbitrary Choice - 6 -existent may be asked as well. Specifically, if observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames each measure identically constructed rods at rest in the other observers' inertial reference frame, each observer will measure the rod in the other frame, the "moving" frame, to be shorter than the rod in their own frame in which it is at rest. Thus, who is really measuring the shorterrod? In the next two sections, these relationships are discussed in greater detail and pictorially depicted. 3. Further Comments on Temporal Relations Between Inertial Reference Frames Figure 1 is a Minkowski diagram of two inertial reference frames, W and W', each of one spatial dimension, moving in a uniform translational manner relative to one another along their respective spatial axes and in whichthe the description of the relative motion begins with the spatial and temporal origins of W and W' corresponding to one another. In the Minkowski diagram, this correspondence of the spatial and temporal origins is represented by the spatial and temporal origins of the coordinate schemes for W and W' overlapping. For inertial reference frame W, axis x and t are the space and time axes respectively. For inertial reference frame W', x' and t' are the space and time axes respectively. The general expressions relating temporal durations in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another are: Dt' = Dt/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (1) where W' is considered the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W the "moving" inertial reference frame, and: Dt = Dt'/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (2) where W is considered the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W' the "moving" inertial reference frame. Dt = t2 - t1, Dt' = t'2 - t'1, v is the magnitude of the uniform translational velocity of W and W' relative to one another, and c is the invariant velocity of light in inertial reference frames. As will be shown in "Spatiotemporal Relations and the Lorentz Transformation Equations," equations 1 and 2 are derived from the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations. First, consider the scenario where an observer at rest in W' considers the time measured by a clock at rest in W. With regard to W', the clock at rest in W is moving with a uniform, translational velocity, -v. This particularOn the Arbitrary Choice - 7 -xt x't'x' = 0 x = vt t' = 0 t = vx 012345678910 012345678910t'=10/(1-v /c )2 21/2 11121112 0123456789101112 0123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2WW W'W'world line of clock at rest in W -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6Figure 1. Minkowski diagram of W and W' showing relation between time of "moving" clock at rest in W and time of clocks at rest in "stationary" reference frame W'. Figure 1 Minkowski diagram of W and W' showing relation between time of "moving" clock at rest in W and time of clocks at rest in "stationary" reference frame W'.On the Arbitrary Choice - 8 -relationship of temporal durations measured by observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames and who use clocks at rest in their respectiveframes is given by equation 1. In this scenario, W' is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W is the "moving" inertial reference frame. Let the axis t from t = 0 to t = 10 represent the position of a clock at rest in W from t = 0 to t = 10 at the spatial origin of W, x = 0. In W', the times corresponding to t = 0 and t = 10 will be measured by different clocks that are at rest in W'. The clock at rest in W' at x = 0, t = 0 in W will be at x' = 0 inW'. The clock at rest in W' at x = 0, t = 10 in W will be at x' = -6 in W'. (Remember that in W' the clock at rest in W is moving with the same uniform, translational velocity that W is moving relative to W'.) In order to determine the duration in W' corresponding to a duration of 10 units in W, one needs toextend a line parallel to the spatial axis in W', namely x', and intersecting x = 0and t = 10 in W, to see where it intersects with the time axis for W', t'. (This line represents the temporal coordinate, t', in W' that corresponds to the point x = 0 and t = 10 in W. The intersection of this line, parallel to the x' axis, with the axis t' yields the time coordinate in W' corresponding to t = 10 and x = 0 inW.) The t' axis is intersected at t' = 10/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2. As noted, the time and space coordinates of the origins of W and W' overlap, and thus t' = 0 and x' = 0 in W' corresponds to t = 0 and x = 0 in W. The difference between t' = 10/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 and t' = 0, namely Dt' = 10/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 is the amount of time in W' corresponding to Dt = 10 units in W. In Figure 1, it is readily seen that the amount of time elapsed in W' corresponding to the elapse of 10 units in W is over 10 units. Consider the reverse circumstance as portrayed in Figure 2 and which is a pictorial representation of equation 2. Here an observer in W considers the time measured by a clock at rest in W'. With regard to W, the clock at rest in W' moves with a uniform translational velocity v (the sign is changed because of the reversal in direction of the velocity). In this scenario, W is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W' is the "moving" inertial reference frame. In this case, let the axis t' from t' = 0 to t' = 10 represent the position ofa clock at rest in W' from t' = 0 to t' = 10 at the spatial origin of W', x' = 0. InW, the times corresponding to t' = 0 and t' = 10 will be measured by different clocks that are at rest in W. In order to determine the duration in W corresponding to a duration of 10 units in W', one needs to extend a line parallel to the spatial axis in W, namely x, and intersecting x' = 0 and t' = 10 inW', to see where it intersects with the time axis for W, t. (This line representsOn the Arbitrary Choice - 9 -xt x't'x' = 0 x = vt t' = 0 t = vx 012345678910 012345678910 11121112 0123456789101112 0123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2WW W'W' t=10/(1-v /c )2 21/2 world line of clock at rest in W' Figure 2. Minkowski diagram of W and W' showing relation between time of "moving" clock at rest in W' and time of clocks at rest in "stationary" reference frame W.On the Arbitrary Choice - 10 -the temporal coordinate, t, in W that corresponds to the point x' = 0 and t' = 10 in W'. The intersection of this line parallel to x with the axis tyields the time coordinate in W corresponding to t' = 10 and x' = 0 in W'.) The t axis is intersected at t = 10/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2. As noted, the time and space coordinates of the origins of W and W' overlap, and thus t = 0 in W corresponds to t' = 0 and x' = 0 in W'. The difference between t = 10/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 and t = 0, namely Dt = 10/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 is the amount of time in W corresponding to Dt' = 10 units in W'. In Figure 2, it is readily seen that the amount of time elapsed in W corresponding to the elapse of 10 units in W' is over 10 units. The two circumstances discussed above, in essence, reflect the conundrum concerning the relation between temporal durations in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. At first, it seems there is no problem at all. In each scenario, a clock is designated at rest in one of the inertial reference frames (e.g., Q) and is considered movingwith uniform translational velocity relative to an observer at rest in the other inertial reference frame (e.g., P). This all seems very straightforward. One is dealing with a clearly designated clock, the particular motion of which is clearly delineated for observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames. The problem comes when one notes that the time of this clock is measured by the observer in P for whom the clock is moving in a uniform translational manner by using at least two clocks that are at rest in this observer's inertial reference frame. The problem arises because an observer at rest in the inertial reference frame Q which has what the observer in P considers the "moving" clock insteadconsiders his own reference frame Q in which he is at rest the "stationary" reference frame and the other inertial reference frame P, including the clocks atrest in it, moving in a uniform translational manner relative to his reference frame. In terms of the modification of the twin paradox at issue in this paper, both twins correctly maintain in terms of the special theory that the other twin isaging more slowly. 4. The Relations Between Spatial Lengths in Inertial Reference Frames A similar effect occurs for spatial length as well. The relation for spatial lengths in the two inertial frames W and W' for the circumstance where the observer at rest in W' considers the length of a rod at rest in W is: Dx' = Dx(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (3).On the Arbitrary Choice - 11 -In this scenario, W' is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W is the "moving" inertial reference frame. For the circumstance where the observer at rest in W considers the length of a rod at rest in W' and aligned along the direction of relative motion of W and W', the relation is: Dx = Dx'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (4). In this scenario, W is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W' is the "moving" inertial reference frame. As with the case of time and clocks, the analysis would seem very straightforward. A rod can be at rest in one inertial reference frame and movingwith a uniform translational velocity relative to another inertial reference frame. If the rod is at rest in W, then the relation between the lengths of the rod in W and W' is given by equation 3. (As noted, in this scenario, W' is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W is the "moving" inertial reference frame.) This circumstance is depicted in Figure 3. If a rod of length 10 units isat rest in W, the length of this rod is less than 9 units in W'. The dashed line represents part of the world line of the end of the rod that is situated at x = 10 when t = 0 in W where it is at rest. In order to measure the length of therod in W', the "stationary" reference frame, the coordinates corresponding to the ends of the rod must be determined simultaneously in W'. Since it is known that the spatial and temporal origins of W and W' overlap, it is known that the end of the rod situated at x = 0 and t = 0 in W will have the coordinatesx' = 0 and t' = 0 in W'. In W', the spatial coordinates of the other end of the rod corresponding to t' = 0 can be determined by the intersection of the world line of the rod with the x' axis in W'. This point, as shown in Figure 3, is between 8 and 9 units. 3 If, instead, the rod is at rest in W', then the relation between the lengths of the rod in W and W' is given by equation 4. In this scenario, W is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W' is the "moving" inertial reference frame. This circumstance is illustrated in Figure 4. 4 The problem arises, though, that one can argue the relativity of simultaneity and thus derive the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations, upon which equations 3 and 4, as well as equations 1 and 2, are dependent, beginning with either of the inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. It is because one can begin the argument with either reference frame and establish simultaneity in either of the inertial reference frames first, which is deemed the "stationary" inertial reference frame,On the Arbitrary Choice - 12 -xt x't'x' = 0 x = vt t' = 0 t = vx 012345678910 012345678910 11121112 0123456789101112 0123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2WW W'W' x'=10(1-v /c )2 2 1/2 world line of 1 end of rod at rest in W Figure 3. Minkowski diagram of W and W' showing relation between spatial length of rod at rest in W and spatial length of "moving" rod in "stationary" reference frame W'.On the Arbitrary Choice - 13 -xt x't'x' = 0 x = vt t' = 0 t = vx 012345678910 012345678910 11121112 0123456789101112 0123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2WW W'W' x=10(1-v /c )2 21/2world line of 1 endof rod at rest in W' Figure 4. Minkowski diagram of W and W' showing relation between spatial length of rod at rest in W' and spatial length of "moving" rod in "stationary"reference frame W.On the Arbitrary Choice - 14 -that there are two reciprocal sets of equations relating spatial lengths and temporal durations for inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. If it were not possible to begin the argument on the relativity of simultaneity and first establish simultaneity in either inertial reference frame, one of the inertial reference frames would be a preferred inertial reference frame, and the establishment of simultaneity, and thus time and as will be shown space, in this reference frame would be primary. This feature is associated with the fundamental tenet of the special theory that descriptions of physical phenomena from either of two inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another are equivalent for observers at rest intheir respective inertial reference frames. If this tenet did not hold, there would exist the possibility of unique descriptions of physical phenomena in the two inertial reference frames. The inertial reference frame in which simultaneity is first established would be the inertial reference frame from which the description of physical phenomena would be considered more fundamental. A discussion of the underlying foundation of the relationships between spatial lengths and temporal durations in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another follows. First, how the relations forspatial lengths and temporal durations between inertial reference frames having a uniform translational velocity relative to one another are dependent on the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations is shown. Second, how the relations for spatial length and temporal duration and the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations depend on the relativity of simultaneity will be shown.Then, the arbitrary decision concerning which inertial reference frame is "stationary" and which "at rest" in the relativity of simultaneity will be demonstrated using Einstein's 1917 argument. (4) (As discussed previously, "stationary" refers to the reference frame where the argument concerning the relativity of simultaneity begins, where simultaneity, and thus time, is first established for one of the inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. "Moving" essentially refers to the reference frame where the time of the "stationary" reference frame is introduced in order to determine whether the criterion of simultaneity in the "moving" frame is met.) It will be shown that the relativity of simultaneity can be argued with either inertial reference frame considered the "stationary" reference frame and the other reference frame considered the "moving" reference frame. ThisOn the Arbitrary Choice - 15 -arbitrary characteristic of the argument on the relativity of simultaneity impacts the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations as they are dependent on therelativity of simultaneity in the special theory. This arbitrary characteristic also impacts the relationships between the spatial lengths of a physical existent andthe temporal durations of an occurrence in inertial reference frames moving in auniform translational manner relative to one another and to other results in the special theory. In the special theory, because the decision in which direction (i.e., which inertial reference frame is designated the "stationary" inertial reference frame as it is in this frame that simultaneity is first established) to argue the relativity of simultaneity is not constrained by any physical or mental factors, the decision is freely made by the individual making the argument. The decision is a cognitive act on the part of this individual, and this cognitive act has consequences for events in the physical world. This cognitive act and its direct relation to the physical world depends on, and also serves to explain, thefeature of the physical world that an observer at rest in an inertial reference frame considers this frame "stationary". This feature of the physical world allows for the fundamental tenet of the special theory that descriptions of physical phenomena from either of two inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another are equivalent for observers at rest intheir respective inertial reference frames. 5. Spatiotemporal Relations and the Lorentz Transformation Equations Two sets of reciprocal relations have been discussed that relate the temporal durations of an occurrence and the spatial lengths of a physical existent in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. One set of relations (set 1) is comprised of equations 1 and 3 andis pictorially represented in Figures 1 and 3. The other set of relations (set 2) iscomprised of equations 2 and 4 and is pictorially represented in Figures 2 and 4. Set 1 is most naturally derived from the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations 5 and 6. The term most naturally means that the inertial reference frame designated the "stationary" frame and the inertial reference frame designated the "moving" frame in the derivation of the Lorentzcoordinate transformation equations retain their roles in the spatial length and temporal duration relations in set 1. 5 Equations 5 and 6 are: x = (x' + vt')/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 (5)On the Arbitrary Choice - 16 -and t = [t' + (v/c 2)x']/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 (6). Set 2 is most naturally derived from the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations: x' = (x - vt)/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 (7) and t' = [t - (v/c 2)x]/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (8). The derivations of equations 2 and 4 using equations 7 and 8 follow immediately. The derivation of equation 3 using equations 7 and 8 is then carried out in the section, "How Spatiotemporal Relations Between Inertial Reference Frames Depend on the Relativity of Simultaneity." This derivation will show the significance of the relativity of simultaneity in the equations relating spatial extension of physical existents and temporal duration ofoccurrences in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. It does so, though, by switching in midstream, so to speak, which inertial reference frame is the "stationary" reference frame and which the "moving" reference frame. It is shown that the Lorentz coordinate transformations derived with one inertial reference frame the "stationary" reference frame and the other inertial reference frame the "moving" inertial reference frame can be used to deduce the relation between spatial lengths and temporal durations for these reference frames where the "stationary" frame becomes the "moving" frame and the "moving" frame becomes the "stationary"frame. It should be emphasized that this is possible only because the relativity of simultaneity can be argued in either direction, that is with either inertial reference frame designated the "stationary" reference frame and the other inertialreference frame designated the "moving" inertial reference frame. 5.1.The Derivation of Equation 2 W and W' have been specified as one dimensional spatial coordinate systems moving in a uniform translational manner relative to one another along their respective spatial axes, x of W and x' of W'. This relative motion can be determined from either W or W' by observers O (at rest in W) and O' (at rest in W'). Allow that O considers W' to be in uniform, translational motion with thevelocity v along the x and x' axes in the direction of increasing values of x andx'. In this scenario, W is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W' is the"moving" inertial reference frame. Also, for O, at rest in W, W is theOn the Arbitrary Choice - 17 -"stationary" inertial reference frame and W' is the "moving" inertial reference frame. Then the Lorentz transformation equations of special relativity for transforming space and time coordinates for W (represented by the variables x and t, respectively) and space and time coordinates for W' (represented by x' and t', respectively) are equations 7 and 8. (Equations 7 and 8 are the relevant equations instead of equations 5 and 6 because in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity, W is considered "stationary" by O and O considered W' to be"moving.") (These same circumstances will hold for the derivation of equation 4 as well.) Multiplying both sides of equation 8 by (1 - v 2/c2)1/2 and adding (v/c2)x to both sides of this equation, one obtains: t = t'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + (v/c2)x. The goal is to determine t 2 - t1 (i.e., the temporal duration in W) corresponding to the temporal duration measured by a "moving" clock, which is at rest in W' (i.e., at a particular location x 1'). For t1 and t2 in W, the last equation becomes: t1 = t1'[1 - v2/c2]1/2 + (v/c2)x1 and t2 = t2'[1 - v2/c2]1/2 + (v/c2)x2 where x1 and x2 are coordinates in W such that x 1' is the particular value in W' corresponding to the values x 1 and x2, and t1' and t2' are the corresponding values in W' to t 1 and t2. Equation 7 can be expressed as x = x'(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 + vt. Substituting for x 1 and x2 in the above equations for t1 and t2, one obtains: t1=[ t1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2] + [[v/c2] [x1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt1]] and t2=[ t2'(1 - v2/c2)1/2] + [[v/c2][x1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt2]] . Now, t2 - t1= [[t2'(1 - v2/c2)1/2] + [[v/c2][x1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt2]]] - [[t1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2] + [[v/c2][x1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt1]]]On the Arbitrary Choice - 18 -t2 - t1= [[t2' - t1'][(1 - v2/c2)1/2]] + [(v/c2)(vt2 - vt1)] t2 - t1= [[t2' - t1'][(1 - v2/c2)1/2]] +[(v2/c2)(t2 - t1)] . Subtracting [(v 2/c2)(t2 - t1)] from both sides of the above equation, one obtains: (t2 - t1) - [(v2/c2)(t2 - t1)] = [t2' - t1'][(1 - v2/c2)1/2] (t2 - t1)(1 - v2/c2) = [t2' - t1'][(1 - v2/c2)1/2] t2 - t1 = [[t2' - t1'][(1 - v2/c2)1/2]]/(1 - v2/c2) . Thus, t2 - t1 = (t2' - t1')/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 . With Dt = t2 - t1 and Dt' = t2' - t1', Dt = Dt'/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (2). It should be kept in mind that the inertial reference frame which has been designated "stationary," W, could just as easily have been designated the"moving" inertial reference frame. W' could just as easily have been designatedthe "stationary" inertial reference frame instead of the "moving" reference frame. In this alternative, scenario, equation 1 would have been derived using equations 5 and 6. 5.2 The Derivation of Equation 4 Using the same circumstances involving W and W' specified for the derivation of equation 2, allow that the rod, aligned along the line of relative motion, in our example is at rest in W' and is thus moving with uniform, translational velocity v relative to O. As in the previous example, W is considered the "stationary" frame and W' is considered the "moving" frame. Arod at rest in W' is measured to be r units by O', who is at rest in W'. The length of this rod when measured by O is calculated by finding the absolute value of the difference of the rod's coordinates along the x axis (i.e., x1 and x2) when measurements of these coordinates are made simultaneously at the time t1, with simultaneity defined specifically for W. The rod's length is x2 - x1|, where the enclosure | | represents the absolute value of the enclosed difference. Since the length of the rod in W' is known, equation 7 can be used to determine the length of the rod in W. Multiplying both sides of equation 7On the Arbitrary Choice - 19 -by (1 - v 2/c2)1/2 and adding vt to both sides of the equation, one obtains x = x'(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 + vt. The goal is to determine |x2 - x1| at a particular time t1. (Since the coordinates of the end of the rod in W will be known at the same time t1 in W, |x 2 - x1| is the length of the "moving" rod in W). For the particular coordinates x 1 and x2 at a particular time t1, the last equation becomes x 1 = x1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt1 and x2 = x2'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt1, where x 1' and x2' are the corresponding x' coordinates in W'. Now, |x2 - x1| = |(x 2'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt1) - (x1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2+ vt1)| |x2 - x1|= | x2'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 - x1' (1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt1 - vt1| |x2 - x1| = |(x2' - x1')(1 - v2/c2)1/2| , or with Dx = |x2 - x1| and Dx' = |x2' - x1'| , Dx = Dx'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (4). As |x2' - x1'| = r and is positive, Dx = r(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 . Just as equation 1 of set 1 could have been derived from equations 5 and 6, instead of equation 2 of set 2 from equations 7 and 8, so equation 3 ofset 1 could just as well have been derived from equation 5, instead of equation4 of set 2 from equation 7. A summary of the circumstances for deriving set 1 and equations 5 and 6 is presented in Table 1 in Appendix 1. A summary of thecircumstances for deriving set 2 and equations 7 and 8 is presented in Table 2 inAppendix 1. These tables illustrate the point that the same concrete circumstances in the physical world can support both scenarios concerned with the relation between the spatial lengths of physical existents and the temporal duration ofoccurrences in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. That is, there may be similarly constructed measuring rods and clocks at rest in each of these respective inertial reference frames. The questionarises, and will be addressed later, as to the basis for the different empirical results regarding the spatial lengths of physical existents and the temporal durations of occurrences in these inertial reference frames if the same concrete circumstances in the physical world can support either scenario. Also, theOn the Arbitrary Choice - 20 -lengths of the measuring rods at rest or the clocks at rest in an inertial reference frame will be found to depend on whether they are at rest in the "stationary" reference frame or the "moving" reference frame. This last feature of the special theory serves to emphasize that the spatiotemporal structure of the physical world does not depend on concrete circumstances in the physical world. 6. How Spatiotemporal Relations Between Inertial Reference Frames Depend on the Relativity of Simultaneity The central importance of the relativity of simultaneity to the Lorentz transformation for time coordinates, and thus to the functioning of clocks at restin their respective inertial frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another, is shown by discussing the derivation of the length of a rod that is at rest in W and that is thus a moving rod for O' who is at rest in W'. This derivation will, of course, demonstrate the importance of the relativity of simultaneity to the functioning of measuring rods at rest in their respective inertial reference frames and also to the Lorentz transformation equation for space coordinates along the axis of uniform translational velocity of the inertial reference frames relative to one another. As noted, W and W' have been specified as one dimensional spatial coordinate systems moving in a uniform translational manner relative to one another along their respective spatial axes. This relative motion can be determined from either W or W' by observers O (at rest in W) and O' (at rest in W'). Allow that O considers W' to be in uniform translational motion with the velocity v along the x and x' axes in the direction of increasing values of x andx'. That is, W is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W' is the "moving" inertial reference frame in this scenario. Then the Lorentz transformation equations of special relativity for transforming space and time coordinates for W (represented by the variables x and t) and space and time coordinates for W' (represented by x' and t') are: x' = (x - vt)/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 (7) and t' = [t - (v/c 2)x]/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (8) where v is the relative uniform translational motion of W and W' and c is the invariant velocity of light in all inertial frames of reference. (5) Let the length of a measuring rod that is at rest in either W or W', andOn the Arbitrary Choice - 21 -which is aligned along the line of relative motion of W and W', be measured by observers at rest with regard to the rod to be r units. In the special theory, the length of a similarly constructed and similarly aligned measuring rod at rest in the other inertial frame will also be r units when this length is determined by observers at rest in the other frame. But the length of the rod at rest in W', for example, will not be r units when determined by observers at rest in W for which the rod is moving at the uniform translational velocity v in the same direction as W' is moving relative to W. Rather, the length of the rod, aligned along the direction of relative motion of W and W' will be r(1 - v2/c2)1/2 units for observers at rest in W (here the "stationary" frame), where v is the uniform translational velocity of one frame relative to the other, c is the constant and finite velocity of light in all inertial frames, and v is less than c. 6.1 Simultaneity and Spatial Measurement Allow now that the measuring rod of concern is at rest in W, instead of W', and is thus moving with uniform translational velocity v relative to O'. As noted, this rod is measured to be r units by O. The length of this rod when measured by O' is calculated by finding the absolute value of the difference of the rod's coordinates along the x' axis (i.e., x'1 and x'2) when measurements of these coordinates are made simultaneously at the time t'1, with simultaneity defined specifically for W'. (Here W' is the "stationary" frame and W is the "moving" frame.) The rod's length is |x' 2 - x'1|, where the enclosure | | represents the absolute value of the enclosed difference. Since the length of the rod in W is known, the Lorentz transformation equations 7 and 8 can be used to determine the length of the rod in W'. For Dx' = |x'2 - x'1|, Dx = r = |x 2 - x1|, and Dt = t2 - t1, Dx' = (Dx - vDt)/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (9) Dt' = [Dt - (v/c2)Dx]/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (10) In equation 10, it can be seen that there has to be a difference Dt = v/c2(r) in order for Dt' = 0. With Dt' = 0 in equation 10, Dx' can be derived using equation 9 because it is assured that the two ends of the rod are being measured simultaneously in W'. Since it is necessary that Dt = (v/c2)r in order that Dt' = 0, Dt has a non-zero value whenever the inertial frames are moving relative to one another. To find Dx', given that Dt = v/c2(Dx): Dx' = (Dx - v(v/c2(Dx)))/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2On the Arbitrary Choice - 22 -Dx' = (Dx - (v2/c2(Dx))/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 Dx' = [(Dx)(1 - v2/c2)]/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 Dx' = [(Dx)(1 - v2/c2)]/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 Dx' = (Dx)(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (3). Equation 10 is an expression of the relation between temporal durations of an occurrence in these inertial reference frames, and the term v/c2(r) reflects the relativity of simultaneity in the special theory. Further, equation 8 of the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations, from which equation 10 is simplyderived, contains the term v/c 2(x). It is also shown that the relativity of simultaneity is central to the relation between spatial extension in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. It is clear from an inspection of equations 5 through 8 that space and time are dependent on one another in the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations. Not surprisingly, the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations themselves depend on the relativity of simultaneity. 5,6 The relativity of simultaneity is built into the term (1 - v2/c2)1/2. If c were arbitrarily great instead of invariant and finite, equations 6 and 8 would be t = t', the Galilean coordinate transformation for time, which is based on absolute simultaneity for inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. Equations 7 and 8 of the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations are derived with W the "stationary" frame and W' the "moving" frame. What has been done in the derivation of equation 3 here is to switch which inertial reference frame is "moving" and which "stationary" by making Dt' = 0 through setting Dt = v/c2(r) instead of Dt = 0 as was done in the derivation of Dx = Dx'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (4) using equation 7. In setting Dt' = 0, one is concerned with the length of the "moving" rod, at rest in W (the "moving" frame), as measured from W' (the "stationary" frame). In setting Dt = 0 in the derivation of equation 4 from equation 7, one is concerned with the length of the "moving" rod, at rest in W' (the "stationary" frame), as measured in W (the "moving" frame). It should be noted that this analysis in which equation 3 wasderived using equations 7 and 8 could instead have been argued using equations5 and 6. Then, equation 4 would have been the result. In the foregoing analysis, it has been shown that spatiotemporal relations between inertial reference frames in uniform translational motionOn the Arbitrary Choice - 23 -relative to one another depend on which frame is considered the "stationary" inertial reference frame and which the "moving" inertial reference frame. Moreover, the importance of the relativity of simultaneity to these spatiotemporal relations and the Lorentz coordinate transformation equationshas been shown. Now Einstein's argument on the relativity of simultaneity needs to be presented, and it needs to be shown that the argument can be made from either direction, with either inertial reference frame the "stationary" frame while the other frame is designated the "moving" inertial reference frame once the "stationary" frame in a scenario has been designated. Furthermore, the arbitrary choice in which direction the relativity of simultaneity is argued needs to be shown. The point needs to be elaborated that these directions, each carrying their own distinct empirical results (as has been shown concerning the relationship between temporal durations of occurrences and spatial lengths of physical existents for inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another), are reflected in observers being at rest in their respective inertial reference frames and experiencing their inertial reference frame as "stationary" and concluding that the other inertial reference frame is "moving." It is this experience on the part of observers that allows there to be an arbitrary decision on the part of the individual considering the argument on the relativity of simultaneity or, for that matter, the relationship between spatial lengths of objects and temporal durations of occurrences in inertial reference frames in uniform translational velocity relative to one another. Just as there can be no physical constraint pointing to one or the other of the inertial reference frames being favored in terms of the description of physical phenomena, so there can be no mental constraint as well. That observers at rest in their inertial reference frames consider their respective frames the "stationary" reference frame indicates there is no mental constraint. The circumstances, both physical and mental, are presented pictorially in Tables1 and 2, and it can be seen that the same concrete circumstances in the physicalworld as well as the mental circumstances of the observers at rest in their inertial reference frames are the same in both tables. There are those, such as Grünbaum (6) and Winnie(7,8), who maintain essentially that the relativity of simultaneity is not necessary to derive other results of the special theory. As Franzel (9) noted, those adhering to a conventionalist position, such as Grünbaum, maintain that the round trip velocity of light used in establishing simultaneity in the special theory does notOn the Arbitrary Choice - 24 -necessarily entail that the velocity of this light is in each direction the same. That is, even though the averaged, round trip velocity agrees with the empirically determined velocity of light in vacuo, its one-way velocity need not be in agreement with the empirically determined value. Franzel also noted that akind of "practical" absolute simultaneity is possible as an alternative to the relativity of simultaneity developed by Einstein. The point missed by such adherents to these other positions is the theoretical simplicity and yet fundamental and far reaching ramifications of the argument on the relativity ofsimultaneity as regards the special theory. It is not difficult to show that it is therelativity of simultaneity, as opposed to the absolute simultaneity of the kinematics underlying Newtonian mechanics, that distinguishes the results of the special theory from the results of Newtonian mechanics. It has been shown, for example, in the present paper how the relativity of simultaneity is central to the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations and thespatiotemporal relations that underlie the other results of the special theory. It should be emphasized that the concern in the present paper is not with attempting to refute the significance of the relativity of simultaneity in thespecial theory. The concern is with investigating certain implications of the relativity of simultaneity in the special theory. 7. Einstein's 1917 Argument on the Relativity of Simultaneity The relativity of simultaneity will be argued using a slightly modified version of Einstein's 1917 gedankenexperiment (i.e., thought experiment). (10) The gedankenexperiment involves a railway train that is moving with a uniform translational velocity v along an embankment. Both the train and embankment are considered inertial frames of reference. An observer (O t) is located on the railway train midway between the ends of the train. In addition, an observer (O e) is located midway between the points on the embankment corresponding to the ends of the train just when two lightning flashes strike the ends of the train. Let the motion of the train and thelight flash in event A have the same direction in the frame of the embankment,and the motion of the train and the light flash in event B have opposite directions in the frame of the embankment. Einstein wrote concerning the special theory that two events, which each give off a flash of light, may be considered simultaneous in an inertial frame of reference when an observer located midway between the spatial locations of the events observes these flashes of light emitted in both events atOn the Arbitrary Choice - 25 -the same time. (11) According to Einstein's argument, due to the postulated and empirically validated invariant velocity of light, the two lightning flashes in events A and B meet at the observer O who is located at the midpoint of the embankment. The events A and B in which these flashes occurred are considered simultaneous in the frame of the embankment, in accordance with Einstein's definition. (Please see Figure 5.) Here, the embankment is the "stationary" inertial reference frame, the reference frame where the argument onthe relativity of simultaneity begins. It is the inertial reference frame in which simultaneity, and thus time, is first established for one of the inertial reference frames. Einstein described this scenario in the following way: When we say that the lightning strokes A and B are simultaneous with respect to the embankment, we mean: the rays of light emitted at the places A and B, where the lightning occurs, meet each other at the mid- point M of the length A --> B of the embankment. But the events A andB also correspond to positions A and B on the train. Let M' be the mid- point of the distance A --> B on the travelling train. Just when the flashes1 of lightning occur [that result in the flashes of light noted above], this point M' [the midpoint of the train] naturally coincides withthe point M [the midpoint of that part of the embankment corresponding to the "moving" train], but it moves...with the velocity v of the train.(12) To which reference frame are the flashes of lightning referred to first? In which reference frame are they used in an attempt to establish simultaneity, and thus also time, first in accordance with Einstein's definition? Einstein answered the question in writing that "the rays of light at the places A and B...meet each other at the mid-point M of the length A --> B of the embankment." He also answered these questions when he wrote in the footnote appended to the phrase, "Just when the flashes 1 of lightning occur": 1 As judged from the embankment. (13) It is the time in the reference frame of the embankment which is given priority and established first in Einstein's argument on the relativity of simultaneity. But, Einstein argued, the situation for the observer O t on the train is different. Einstein wrote:On the Arbitrary Choice - 26 -A BC time spaceOworld line of O Time and space axes for the inertial reference frame of the embankment. are the events at which light flashes are emitted from the postions of the embankment corresponding to the ends of the train with the frame of the embankment considered the "stationary" reference frame. t world line of one end of the trainworld line of O and middle of the trainworld line of one end of the train middle of embankment corresponding to ends of "moving" train ee Figure 5. Simultaneity in the inertial reference frame of the embankment according to Einstein's train gedankenexperiment.On the Arbitrary Choice - 27 -Now in reality (considered with reference to the railway embankment) he [the observer on the train] is hastening [italics added] towards the beam of light coming from B, whilst he is riding on ahead [italics added] of the beam of light coming from A. Hence the observer will see the beam of light emitted from Bearlier than he will see that emitted from A. Observers who take the railway train as their reference-body must therefore come to the conclusion that the lightning flash B took place earlier than the lightning flash A. (14) Where the frame of the embankment is the "stationary" frame, for O t, the lightning flashes have different effective velocities, depending on whether the particular beam is moving in the same or opposite direction to that of the train. (The measured velocity of light by O t is, of course, the same finite and invariant value it has in all inertial reference frames. It is this finite and invariant value that is central to Einstein's criterion for simultaneity in an inertial reference frame.) In the case where the train has the uniform velocity v and thelightning flashes have the invariant velocity c for the observer O on the embankment, the light flash from A has the effective velocity c - v and the light flash from B has the effective velocity c + v relative to the observer on the train.7 In Figure 6, it can be seen that the flashes of light do not meet at the observer O t who is at rest midway between the ends of the train. When Ot applies Einstein's criterion for simultaneity for an inertial reference frame to these light flashes, he finds the criterion is not met. Thus, Einstein concluded that two occurrences which are simultaneous for the observer at rest in the inertial frame of the embankment are not simultaneous for the observer at rest inthe inertial frame of the train. (In that the observer on the train "is hastening towards the beam from light from B, whilst he is riding on ahead of the beam of light coming from A," Einstein again confirmed that the observer on the train is using the time of the reference frame of the embankment to determine whether simultaneity of the reference frame of the embankment holds in the reference frame of the train as well.) In Einstein's scenario, the train is the "moving" inertial reference frame, the reference frame where the time of the "stationary" reference frame is appliedthrough the use of the terms c - v and c + v to determine whether Einstein's criterion for simultaneity in the reference frame of the train is met. In terms of the space of the inertial reference frame of the railway embankment, the midpoint of the train will be displaced by v Dt, where v is the uniformOn the Arbitrary Choice - 28 -ABCD Etime vDt Hworld line of one end of the trainworld line of O and middle of the trainworld line of one end of the traint spaceO Time and space axes for the inertial reference frame of the embankment. are the events at which light flashes are emitted from the postions of the embankment corresponding to the ends of the train with the frame of the embankment considered the "stationary" reference frame. middle of embankment corresponding to ends of "moving" train e Figure 6. Simultaneity in the inertial reference frames of the embankment and the train with the embankment considered the "stationary" reference frame and the train the "moving" reference frame.On the Arbitrary Choice - 29 -translational velocity of the train relative to the embankment and Dt is the time in the reference frame of the embankment taken by the rays of light that strike the ends of the train to reach O at the midpoint of the embankment. Further discussion is needed on this last point concerning the arbitrary nature of deciding which frame is "stationary" and which is "moving" for the purpose of arguing the relativity of simultaneity. The argument presented above concerning the relativity of simultaneity may be applied almost exactly tothe situation in the train gedankenexperiment where the observer at rest on the train is considered at rest in the "stationary" inertial reference frame and the observer at rest on the embankment is considered at rest in the "moving" inertial reference frame. Indeed, the only two changes are: 1) the switch of roles as to which frame is the "stationary" frame and which the "moving" frame (i.e., in which inertial reference frame simultaneity is first established), and 2) the reversal in direction of the velocity of the embankment and the train relative to one another. 8 In the scenario where the train is considered the "stationary" frame and the embankment the "moving" frame, because of the postulated and empirically validated invariant velocity of light, the two light flashes meet at the observer O t located midway on the train. The motion of the embankment and the light flash from B have the same direction in the frame of the train, and the motion of the embankment and the light flash from A have opposite directions in the frame of the train. (Please see Figure 7.) The lightning flashes are considered simultaneous in the frame of the train (in this scenario, the "stationary" reference frame), in accordance with Einstein's definition of simultaneity. As deduced by the "stationary" observer on the train, the light flash in A has the velocity c + v relative to the "moving" observer on the embankment and the light flash in B has the velocity c - v relative to the observer on the embankment. In Figure 7, it can be seen that the flashes of light do not meet at the observer O e who is at rest midway between the ends of the embankment. When O e applies Einstein's criterion for simultaneity for an inertial reference frame to these light flashes, he finds the criterion is not met. Similar to the first scenario, it can be concluded that two occurrences which are simultaneous for the observer at rest in the inertial frame of the train are not simultaneous for the observer at rest in the inertial frame of the embankment. There is nothing that points in any way to an individual arguing the relativity of simultaneity in one direction or the other, that is with one of the reference frames more likely than the other to be designated the "stationary"On the Arbitrary Choice - 30 -A middle of train corresponding to positions on "moving" embankmentBCD Etime space|-vDt| Hworld line of position on embankment where lightning struckworld line of O and middle of the embankmente world line of position on embankment where lightning struck Ot Time and space axes for the inertial reference frame of the train. are the events at which light flashes are emitted from the ends of the train corresponding to positions on the embankment with the frame of the train considered the "stationary" reference frame. Figure 7. Simultaneity in the inertial reference frames of the embankment and the train with the embankment considered the "stationary" reference frame and the embankment the "moving" reference frame.On the Arbitrary Choice - 31 -frame. If one were more likely, the fundamental tenet of the special theory that there is no preferred reference frame as concerns the description of physical phenomena for observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another would be violated. There would be a preferred inertial reference frame, and it would be the frame designated the "stationary" frame. There is thus a free choice on the part of the individual making the argument on the relativity of simultaneity as to which direction the argument should proceed. In that this choice is not limited by any physical factor in the special theory in any way, it can be said that the choice is fundamentally a cognitive one, not reducible to some physical substrate, and that this cognitive choice is reflected in distinct sets of empirical results found when certain measurements are taken in the physical world. Whichever direction is chosen, this direction will correspond to a distinct set of results obtained by an observer at rest in his inertial reference frame and which he considers the "stationary" reference frame. It should be noted that the assumption, supported empirically, that an observer at rest in his inertial reference frame considers this reference frame "stationary" and the other inertial reference frame "moving" supports the premise that there is no mental factor that prompts an individual to argue the relativity of simultaneity in one directionor the other. 8. The Arbitrary Decision in the Argument on the Relativity of Simultaneity The basic point is this. If the railway embankment is considered the "stationary" reference frame, then in Einstein's argument simultaneity is first established in this inertial reference frame in terms of the motion of light . The light flashes leaving from the points of the embankment corresponding to the ends of the train meet midway on the embankment between these two points. As concerns the train, these light flashes certainly do not meet midway on the train. This is seen in an inspection of Figure 5. As noted, simultaneity in the reference frame of the embankment is defined as the meeting at C of the lightflashes represented by AC and BC. As can be seen in Figure 6, simultaneity in the train, the "moving" reference frame, is achieved when the flash leaving from the end of the train in event A meets at event D what appears to be a newflash leaving from the other end of the train in event E. E is an event on the x'axis. That the event D represents the light flashes AD and ED meeting midpointon the train is evident from an inspection of Figure 8, which essentially isOn the Arbitrary Choice - 32 -are the events at which light flashes are emitted from the postions of the embankment corresponding to the ends of the train with the frame of the embankment considered the "stationary" reference frame. 01234 56789 1 0x 012345678910 012345678910 12345678910 11121112 ABCD Ex't' = 0 t = vxW't'x' = 0 x = vtW' 1112 11 120vDt WtW world line of one end of the train world line of O and middle of the trainworld line of one end of the train middle of embankment corresponding to ends of "moving" trainOet Figure 8. Minkowski diagram of W and W' showing simultaneity in the inertial reference frames of the embankment (W) and the train (W') with the embankment considered the "stationary" frame.On the Arbitrary Choice - 33 -Figure 6 on which coordinate grids for the inertial reference frames of the embankment and the train have been added. 8.1 The Spatial Length Along the Axis of Motion of Physical Existents at Rest in the "Stationary"and "Moving" Reference Frames One can see in Figure 8 that the length of the train measured by observers at rest on the train is not 10 units but more than 10 units, specifically 10/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 units, because the light flashes AD and DE meet Einstein's criterion that lights flashes from the ends of the train meet the observer at rest located midpoint on the train when the train is considered the "moving" inertial reference frame. In greater detail, when the train is the "moving" reference frame, the events A and D correspond to the ends of the train at the same time inthe reference frame of the train because the light flashes AD and DE meet Einstein's criterion for simultaneity. Since A and D correspond to the ends of the train at the same time, the length from A to D is a measurement of the lengthof the train for observers at rest in the "moving" reference frame of the train. This length, 10/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 units, is established in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity after length is established in the "stationary" frame ofthe embankment where light flashes occur in events A and B that are equidistantfrom the observer at rest in the "stationary" frame of the embankment. Consider the reverse scenario, where the train is considered the "stationary" reference frame and the embankment is considered the "moving" reference frame. The light flashes are the same physical phenomena as in Einstein's scenario. In the reverse scenario, the light flashes AH and GH in Figure 9 are used to establish simultaneity in the inertial reference frame of the train first in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity. The light flashes ADand DE, found in Figure 8, do not appear to be those flashes which are used to establish simultaneity in the reference frame of the train in Figure 9. One wouldthink that the same light flashes that were used to establish simultaneity in Einstein's scenario would be used in the reverse scenario being discussed. Butin comparing Figures 8 and 10 (where the space and time axes for the inertial reference frame of the embankment are drawn in), one can see even more clearly that this does not appear to be the case. In the reverse scenario, the circumstances that had applied to the "moving" reference frame of the train now apply to the "moving" reference frame of the embankment and the circumstances that had applied to theOn the Arbitrary Choice - 34 -012345678910 12345678910 11121112 Ax't' = 0W't'x' = 0W' 0GH I Fmiddle of train corresponding to positions on "moving" embankmentworld line of position on embankment where lightning strucke world line of O and middle of the embankmentworld line of position on embankment where lightning struck Ot are the events at which light flashes are emitted from the ends of the train corresponding to positions on the embankment with the frame of the train considered the "stationar y" reference frame. Figure 9. Simultaneity in the inertial reference frames of the train and the embankment with the train considered the "stationary" frame.On the Arbitrary Choice - 35 --1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -60 123456789 1 0x 012345678910t 012345678910 12345678910 11121112 Ax't' = 0 t = vxW't'x' = 0x = vtW' 1112 11 120WW GH I Fmiddle of train corresponding to positions on "moving" embankmentOt are the events at which light flashes are emitted from the ends of the train corresponding to positions on the embankment with the frame of the train considered the "stationary" reference frame. -6-5-4-3-2-1 -7 Figure 10. Minkowski diagram of W and W' showing simultaneity in the inertial reference frames of the train (W') and the embankment (W) with the train considered the "stationary" frame.On the Arbitrary Choice - 36 -"stationary" reference frame of the embankment now apply to the "stationary" reference frame of the train. One would think this applies to the world lines of the light flashes used to establish simultaneity in the "stationary" as well as the"moving" inertial reference frames. Regardless of the particular world lines of the light flashes, the distance between the flashes in whichever inertial referenceframe is designated the "stationary" frame needs to be the same. In the reverse scenario, the distance between the light flashes used to establish simultaneity inthe "stationary" inertial frame of the train is 10 units, the length of the train. One can see in Figure 10, essentially Figure 9 with coordinates for the frame of the embankment, the analogous circumstances to Figure 8, only whichreference frame is "stationary" and which is "moving" have been reversed. When the embankment is the "moving" reference frame, the events A and I are simultaneous in the "moving" reference frame of the embankment because the light flashes AI and FI meet Einstein's criterion for simultaneity. Since A and Icorrespond to points of the embankment at the same time, the length from A to Iis a measurement of the length of a section of the embankment for observers at rest in the "moving" reference frame of the embankment. This length, 10/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 units, is established in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity after length is established in the "stationary" frame of the train where light flashes occur in events A and G that are equidistant from the observer at rest in the "stationary" frame of the train. This interesting point should be emphasized. The length of an existent at rest in an inertial reference frame as measured by observers at rest in that reference frame is dependent on whether the reference frame is considered the"stationary" or "moving" reference frame in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity. In Figure 9, it can be seen that the light flashes used to delineate simultaneity in the reference frame of the train when it is considered the "stationary" frame are from event A to event H and from event G to event H. (Event H is the meeting of the light flashes originating in events A and G midpoint on the train.) Also, the light flashes from event A to event C and fromevent B to event C found in Figure 8 do not represent light flashes meeting O midpoint on the embankment when it is the "moving" inertial reference frame. Rather, as seen in Figure 9, the lights flashes from event A to event I and from event F to event I represent two light flashes meeting at O midpoint on the embankment when the embankment is the "moving" inertial reference frame. Interms of the logical sequence in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity, the two light flashes from A to I and from F to I are used to establishOn the Arbitrary Choice - 37 -simultaneity in the "moving" reference frame of the embankment after simultaneity is first established in the "stationary" reference frame of the train using light flashes from A to H and from G to H. In an inspection of Figure10, one can see a bit more precisely that the light flashes striking the ends of thetrain and the corresponding points on the embankment and which are used to establish simultaneity in the "stationary" inertial reference frame of the train do not serve to establish simultaneity in the "moving" inertial reference frame of the embankment. In Figure 10, the t coordinate for A is 0, but the t coordinate for G is close to 5. One can also see from an inspection of Figure 10 that where the t' coordinate for A is 0, the t' coordinate for F is between -6 and -7. For A and F, x = 0, and A and F are simultaneous events in the "moving" inertial reference frame of the embankment. What has occurred is that the direction in which the argument on the relativity of simultaneity is made has been reversed, and this reversal has changed the nature of space in a particular inertial reference frame such that the length of the concrete measuring rod at rest in this reference frame and measured by observers at rest in this reference frame is different depending on whether the inertial reference frame in which the rod is at rest is the "stationary"or the "moving" reference frame in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity. (The fundamental tenet is adjusted to: the description of physical phenomena must be the same for observers at rest in their inertial reference frames when these frames are the "stationary" reference frames in the argumenton the relativity of simultaneity and also the description of physical phenomenamust be the same for observers at rest in their inertial reference frames when these frames are the "moving" reference frames in this argument.) There is nothing in the physical world that prompts an individual considering inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another to choose a particular direction in which to argue the relativity of simultaneity. It should be remembered that the possibility of making the argument in either direction without any limitation by the physical world is central to retaining the central tenet of the special theory that there is no preferred inertial reference frame from which to describe physical phenomena. If there were some reason in the physical world to choose one direction over another, there would be a preferred inertial reference frame from which to describe physical phenomena. The choice in arguing the relativity of simultaneity is an arbitrary one, a free one, on the part of the person considering the relativity of simultaneity. This arbitrary choice on the part ofOn the Arbitrary Choice - 38 -the individual considering the relativity of simultaneity is reflected in the observers each being at rest in their respective inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another and considering the inertial reference frame in which each is at rest the "stationary" reference frame and theother observer's inertial reference frame the "moving" reference frame. One might think that the different scenarios regarding spatiotemporal relations can be distinguished by the concrete physical existence of the measuring rod in the case of spatial relations or clocks in the case of temporal relations. That is, it might be thought that even though the relativity of simultaneity can be argued in either direction, in practice, only one scenario applies at any one time and that this limitation is imposed by the concrete physical world. Essentially, the basis for this thought is that the physical mechanism of a clock or the physical structure of the rod are concrete, that is, they are at rest in only one inertial reference frame and that their basic constitution remains unchanged in whatever inertial reference frame from whichthey are considered. It has been shown that with regard to measuring rods, thisis not the case. More generally, the essence of the functioning of a clock in the special theory is the motion of light over a prescribed distance in both possible directions. It is not the concrete existence of a clock that is at the essence of thefunctioning of a clock in an inertial reference frame. This is the case because the synchronization of clocks is established in Einstein's 1905 and 1917 definitions of simultaneity (or the synchronization of clocks) by the motion of light over a prescribed distance in both possible directions. (15) This motion of light can be considered periodic motion, and it is explicitly the periodic motion of light between two spatial points A and B in an inertial reference frame that Einstein relied upon in 1905 in defining simultaneity in his original paper on thespecial theory. Because the length of an existent in an inertial reference frame depends on determining the ends of the existent simultaneously, one would expect that the concrete nature of the existent would not inhibit the fundamental character of the relativity of simultaneity. 8.2 The Time of the "Stationary" Inertial Reference Frame In the argument on the relativity of simultaneity, the "moving" observer relies on simultaneity and time of the "stationary" frame to determine that the criterion for simultaneity is not met by clocks at rest in the "moving" frame because the "moving" observer relies on clocks synchronized in the "stationary"On the Arbitrary Choice - 39 -frame to set clocks at rest in the "moving" frame and thus to determine whether the criterion for simultaneity is met in the "moving" frame. This has been shown in the train gedankenexperiment and will be shown in Einstein's original argument on the relativity on simultaneity. Einstein explicitly proposed in 1905 in his argument on the relativity of simultaneity that the clocks of the "moving" frame are synchronized in accordance with, and rely on, the clocks of the "stationary" frame. (It should be noted with regard to the train gedankenexperiment that if the "moving" observer synchronized his own clockswithout relying on the synchronization of the clocks in the "stationary" inertial frame, the clocks of the "moving" observer would not be subject to the effectivevelocities c + v or c - v. Instead, they only consider the light flashes in terms oftheir finite and invariant velocity c.) In his original paper on the special theory of relativity, Einstein noted that simultaneity (or the common time of clocks) is delineated for an inertial frame of reference when, by definition, the time required for a ray of light to travel from a spatial point A to a spatial point B is equal to the time required for a ray of light to travel from point B to point A. (16) He argued the relativity of simultaneity this way: We imagine further that at the two ends A and B of the rod [moving with uniform translational velocity relative to the stationary inertial system], clocks are placed which synchronize with the clocks of the stationary system, that is to say that their indications correspond at any instant to the "time of the stationary system" at the places where they happen to be. Theseclocks are therefore "synchronous in the stationary system." We imagine further that with each clock there is a moving observer, and that these observers apply to both clocks the criterion established...for the synchronization of two clocks [that the flight time of a light ray in an inertial frame of referencefrom spatial point A to spatial point B is equal to the flight time of a light ray from point B to point A]. Let a ray of light depart from A at the time* t A, let it be reflected at B at the time tB, and reach A again at the time t'A. Taking into consideration the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light we find thatOn the Arbitrary Choice - 40 - r AB r ABtB - tA = ------- and t' A - tB = ------- c - v c + v where rAB denotes the length of the moving rod--measured in the stationary system. Observers moving with the rod would thus find that the two clocks were not synchronous, while observers in the stationary system would declare the clocks to besynchronous. * Time here denotes "time of the stationary system" and also "position of hands of the moving clocks situated at the place under discussion." (17) Whether using readings from clocks synchronized in the "stationary" frame or the coincidence of flashes of light as judged from the railway embankment, the "moving" observer relies on the time established first in the "stationary" frame in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity. This reliance by the "moving" observer on the time established in the "stationary" reference frame sets up a different basis for the development of simultaneity, and thus time, in his own frame than would otherwise have been the case if the "moving" observer had instead been the observer at rest in the "stationary" reference frame in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity. 8.3 The Rate of Clocks at Rest in the "Stationary" and "Moving" Reference Frames It has been shown that the spatial length of a physical existent at rest in an inertial reference frame and aligned along the axis of uniform translational motion of two inertial reference frames relative to one another depends on whether the reference frame in which the rod is at rest is designated the "stationary" or "moving" reference frame in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity. A similar dependency holds for the rate of a clock in an inertial reference frame. The rate of a clock at rest in an inertial reference frame depends on whether the reference frame in which the clock is at rest is designated the "stationary" or "moving" reference frame in the argument on therelativity of simultaneity. In Figures 11 and 12, there are the analogous conditions for temporal durations in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another to those used to explore spatial length. In Figures 11 and 12, Einstein's original argument on the relativity of simultaneity is depicted in its essential elements. Allow that a distance ofOn the Arbitrary Choice - 41 -012 3456 789 1 0x 012345678910t 01234567891 0 12345678910 11121112 ABD x't' = 0 t = vxW't'x' = 0 x = vtW' 1112 11 120WW 1314world line of one end of rod CEworld line of one end of rod Figure 11. Minkowski diagram of inertial reference frames W and W' showing simultaneity in accordance with Einstein's 1905 formulation with W the"stationary" reference frame and W' the "moving" reference frame.On the Arbitrary Choice - 42 -0123456789 1 0x012345678910t 012345678910 12345678910 11121112 AIx't' = 0 t = vxW't'x' = 0 x = vtW' 1112 11 120 WW 13141314 HFGworld line of one end of rodworld line of one end of rod Figure 12. Minkowski diagram of inertial reference frames W and W' showing simultaneity in accordance with Einstein's 1905 formulation with W' the"stationary" reference frame and W the "moving" reference frame.On the Arbitrary Choice - 43 -Dx = 5 units is used to establish simultaneity in accord with Einstein's original criterion. If a light flash travels from event A to event B, traveling Dx, and if the light flash is reflected back without delay, it requires the same amount of time for the light flash to return to x = 0 from x = 5 (in event C) as it took forthe light flash to travel from event A to event B. Einstein's original criterion forsimultaneity in an inertial reference frame is met and time is established in W, the "stationary" frame. Time in W is represented by the t axis.It can be seen in Figure 11 that the simultaneity established in this process in W is not the same as the simultaneity established in W'. An inspection of this figure indicates that simultaneity in W' requires another process. Allow that a rod is at rest in W' and thus moving in a uniform translational manner relative to W and that its length as measured in W is 5 units. Allow that in line with Einstein's criterion, a light flash begins in event A at one end of the rod, travels to event D where it reaches the other end of the rod, and is immediately reflected back. (Event D occurs on the world line of the end of the rod toward which the light flash travels after first being emitted.) The light flash returns to the end of the rod that it originated from in event E at x' = 0. In terms of the time of W, tAD „ tDE and thus Einstein's original criterion for establishing simultaneity is not met in W' when this process is considered in terms of the time of W. From Figure 11, it can also be seen that t' AD » t'DE » 6 units and that simultaneity, and thus time, is established in W' in accordance with Einstein's original criterion for simultaneity in an inertial reference frame. In terms of the time of W', t', the passage of the light ray from one end of the rod to the other and back again occurs in about 12 units. If the concern iswith the amount of time that elapses in W, the "stationary" reference frame, corresponding to these 12 units in W', the "moving" reference frame, the horizontal dashed line parallel to the space axis for W indicates that the corresponding time in W is between 13 and 14 units. Figure 12 displays the reverse scenario where W' is the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W is the "moving" inertial reference frame. Allow that a distance of Dx' = 5 units is used to establish simultaneity in accord with Einstein's original criterion. If a light flash travels from event A to event H, that covers Dx', and if the light flash were reflected back without delay, it requires the same amount of time for the light flash to return to x' = 0 from x' = 5 (in event F) as it took for the light flash to travel from event A to event H. Einstein's original criterion for simultaneity in an inertial reference frame is met and time is established in W', the "stationary" frame. Time in W' isOn the Arbitrary Choice - 44 -represented by the t' axis.It can be seen in Figure 12 that the simultaneity established in this process in W' is not the same as the simultaneity established in W. An inspection of this figure indicates that simultaneity in W requires another process. Allow that a rod is at rest in W and thus moving in a uniformtranslational manner relative to W' and that its length as measured in W' is 5 units. Allow that in line with Einstein's criterion, a light flash begins in event Aat one end of the rod, travels to event I where it reaches the other end of the rod, and is immediately reflected back. (Event I occurs on the world line of the end of the rod toward which the light flash travels after first being emitted.) The light flash returns to the end of the rod that it originated from in event F at x = 0. In terms of the time of W', t'AI „ t'IF and thus Einstein's original criterion for establishing simultaneity is not met in W when this process is considered in terms of the time of W'. From Figure 12, it can also be seen that t'AI » t'IF » 6 units and that simultaneity, and thus time, is established in W in accordance with Einstein's original criterion for simultaneity in an inertial reference frame. In terms of the time of W, t, the passage of the light ray from one end of the rod to the other and back again occurs in about 12 units of time. If the concern is with the amount of time that elapses in W', the "stationary" reference frame corresponding to these 12 units in W, the "moving" reference frame, the dashed line parallel to the space axis for W' indicates that the corresponding time in W' is between 13 and 14 units. Nothing physical is presented to distinguish the different scenarios in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity. All that distinguishes them is an arbitrary choice on the part of the individual arguing the relativity of simultaneity concerning the direction in which the argument is made. This arbitrary choice is anchored in the experience of observers that they are at rest intheir respective inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another and that each of their respective inertial reference frames is for them "stationary" while the other reference frame is "moving." This arbitrary choice concerning the direction in which to argue the relativity of simultaneity ismade implicitly when an individual is concerned with other results of the specialtheory, for example the temporal duration of occurrences or the spatial length ofphysical existents in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. And other results of the special theory depend on thesespatial and temporal relations.On the Arbitrary Choice - 45 -9. An Interesting Circumstance There is an interesting circumstance that results from the possibility of arguing the relativity of simultaneity in either direction, that is with either of twoinertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another designated the "stationary" frame while the other reference frame is designatedthe "moving" frame. This circumstance concerns the nature of the light flashes used to establish simultaneity in the inertial reference frames, in the case of the train gedankenexperiment the embankment and the train. This circumstance serves as an additional indication that the arbitrary decision as to which direction to argue the relativity of simultaneity has an impact on the physical world itself through affecting the light flashes seen by observers at rest in their inertial reference frames in establishing simultaneity in their respective inertial reference frames. The argument on the relativity of simultaneity affects the course in the physical world of these light flashes. This effect occurs even though the physical existence of the light flashes themselves appears not to be impacted. It is the same light flashes that are used in either scenario chosen. There is a set of four world lines each (or, perhaps, more precisely, three world lines of which one has a shorter element) for defining simultaneity in the inertial reference frames of the embankment and the train in each scenario. There are two distinct sets, one for each scenario. The scenario in which the chosen direction has the reference frame of the embankment as the "stationary" inertial reference frame and the train as the "moving" inertial reference frame is depicted in Figure 8. In this scenario, the light flash emitted in event A and meeting in event C the observer at rest midway on the section ofembankment the end positions of which correspond to the ends of the "moving"train, and the light flash emitted in event B and meeting the light flash from A inevent C are used to establish simultaneity in the "stationary" inertial reference frame of the embankment. The light flash emitted in event A that meets the observer at rest on the embankment in event C and travels to event D where it meets the observer at rest midpoint on the train, and the light flash emitted in event E, from the other end of the train that meets the light flash from A in eventD are used to establish simultaneity in the "moving" inertial reference frame of the train. The reverse circumstance can be seen in Figure 10. Where the the inertial reference frame of the train is the "stationary" frame, the light flash emitted in event A and meeting in event H the observer at rest midway on the train the ends of which correspond to the positions on the "moving"On the Arbitrary Choice - 46 -embankment where the lightning flashes struck, and the light flash emitted in event G and meeting the light flash from A in event H are used to establish simultaneity in the "stationary" inertial reference frame of the train. The light flash emitted in event A that meets the observer at rest midpoint on the embankment in event I, and the light flash emitted in event F, from the other end of the embankment where lightning struck that meets the light flash from A in event I are used to establish simultaneity in the "moving" inertial reference frame of the embankment. (Because the embankment is "moving" in the direction of decreasing values of x' and thus towards the light flash emitted in event A, this light flash, in terms of the time of the "stationary" reference frame of the train, meets the observer midpoint on the embankment in event I before the light flash reaches the observer at rest midpoint on the train in event H.) It has been shown that it is an arbitrary decision which frame is considered the "stationary" reference frame and which the "moving" reference frame in Einstein's argument on the relativity of simultaneity. Thus, the question arises: What is the relationship between the light flashes from A to C in Figure 9 and from A to H in Figure 10, as well as those light flashes from B to C in Figure 9 and from G to H in Figure 10, that is between the light flashes that are used to establish simultaneity in the reference frames of the embankment and train respectively when each is considered the "stationary" inertial reference frame in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity? Thelight flashes from A to C and from B to C can have logical priority in the argument, or the light flashes from B to C and from G to H can have logical priority. In terms of the argument, there is only this logical distinction, arbitrarily decided, that determines within each scenario which of the two different pairs of world lines will meet first and which will meet second. How is it that there are two different sets of world lines in Figures 8 and 10 for the light flashes used to establish simultaneity in the inertial reference frame designated the "stationary" reference frame in the argument on therelativity of simultaneity? Are the light flashes from A to C and from A to H thesame light flash? Or are the light flashes from B to C and from G to H the samelight flash? For that matter are the light flashes from A to D in Figure 8 and from A to I in Figure 10 the same? And are the light flashes E to D in Figure 8and from F to I in Figure 10 the same? As can be seen by their world lines in Figures 8 and 10, the members of each pair appear to be different flashes of light in the context of their roles in one of the scenarios in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity (i.e., with one inertial reference frame designated theOn the Arbitrary Choice - 47 -"stationary" reference frame and the other inertial reference frame designated the "moving" reference frame). But since the argument on the relativity of simultaneity can be made in either direction without physical constraint and thus with the same light flashes, it would seem that the light flashes from A to C andfrom A to H are indeed the same light flash, the light flashes from B to C and from G to H are the same light flash, the light flashes from A to D and from A to I are the same light flash, and the light flashes from E to D and from F to I are the same light flash. One might expect that if this is the case, instead of twoworld lines for each of the light flashes that play the same role in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity, albeit in different scenarios, there would be only one world line for the light flashes. Instead, the argument on the relativity of simultaneity indicates that a light flash involved in establishing simultaneity in an inertial reference frame has two world lines in the special theory. 10. Whose Clocks Run Slower? The importance of an observer's considering himself at rest in an inertial reference frame and the observer's considering this reference frame at rest, or the "stationary" reference frame, to the special theory has been discussed. Essentially, if it were not the case for all observers in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another, there would exist some distinction between the observers' experiences of motion in their respective inertial reference frames. The relativity of simultaneity, as well as the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations, then could not be properly derived. A preferred inertial reference frame would exist that would provide the basis for the spatial and temporal structure for the description of events in the physical world. Also, if there were some difference in the motion experienced by observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames, then the relativity of simultaneity and the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations could notbe derived with either inertial reference frame being the "stationary" reference frame and the other reference frame being the "moving" reference frame. The central role of the arbitrary choice in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity concerning which inertial reference frame is "stationary" and which "moving" in the special theory has also been discussed. Among the consequences are different forms of the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations and different equations for relating the spatial length of physical existents along the axis of relative motion and the duration of occurrences between two inertial reference frames moving in a uniform translational mannerrelative to one another. Unlike the twin paradox where physicists generallyOn the Arbitrary Choice - 48 -maintain that one twin is not always in an inertial reference frame, in the problem at hand, observers are always at rest in their respective inertial reference frames. Thus, the question remains, whose clock runs slower? This question becomes particularly important because it can serve to emphasize that the exact same physical circumstances can provide the physical basis for different empirical results, for example whose clocks run slower. In one scenario, an observer A, who is in the "moving" inertial reference frame, has the clocks that run slower in comparison with the clocks that an observer B has in the "stationary" reference frame. In the other scenario, B's clocks run slower than A's clocks. As we have seen, nothing in the physical foundation of these scenarios need be different. Only the direction in which the relativity of simultaneity is argued is different (which inertial reference frame is the "stationary" frame and which the "moving" frame), a difference that depends upon, and helps to explain the significance of, the experience of each of the observers being at rest in the their respective inertial reference frames and considering their respective frames the "stationary" frame. Indeed, if only one scenario held, there would be a preferred reference frame, the reference frame in this scenario from which the other inertial reference frame is judged to be "moving." This circumstance would violate the fundamental tenet of the special theory that inertial reference frames in uniform motion relative to one another are equivalent for the description of physical phenomena. What then is behind the different empirical results if it is not something physical? Whatever it is, it must account first and foremost for the different directions in arguing the relativity of simultaneity that is the foundationfor the other results of the special theory, including the relationship between temporal durations and spatial distances between inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. It is most likely that it is some cognitive factor. The first reason is that the distinction in direction is on the level of the argument itself. The second reason is that there is a decision made by an individual considering the physical circumstances concerning in which direction the relativity of simultaneity is to be argued, which inertial frame is the "stationary" reference frame in which simultaneity is first defined and which the "moving" reference frame. This decision is essentially a psychological act, one which has distinct consequences in the physical world depending on the decision made, namely distinct sets of empirical results that support the special theory, including the temporal and spatial relationships between inertial reference frames in uniformOn the Arbitrary Choice - 49 -translational motion relative to one another. Concerning the distinct sets of results, each is just as likely because the argument on the relativity of simultaneity can be argued in either direction without physical or mental constraint. Either of the two inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another can be designated the "stationary" frame while the other frame is then designated the "moving" frame. The decision to argue inone direction or the other direction is truly a free one on the part of theindividual making the argument and because this decision concerns an argument while concrete physical circumstances can support either direction in which the argument may be made without prompting a decision in one direction, the decision as to which direction to argue the relativity is cognitive in nature, not reducible to a physical substrate, and impacts the physical world. As noted, the arbitrary choice concerning the direction in arguing the relativity of simultaneity extends to the problem raised at the beginning of thispaper, namely the relation of temporal durations of an occurrence in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. In thiscase, the arbitrary decision as to the direction in which to argue the relativity of simultaneity leads to the question concerning which clocks at rest in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another run slower? According to the analysis presented here, one would expect that each observer at rest in his inertial reference frame and considering his frame "stationary" and the other frame "moving" would find that the other observer's clocks are running slower by exactly the same amount. Thus, one should find in experiments where observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another determine the rate of physical processes occurring in one location in the other inertial reference frame (e.g., the rate of a clock at rest in this other inertial reference frame) that both observers will record the same slowing of time in the other inertial reference frame. This condition is a test of the relationship of temporal durationfor some occurrence in both directions and is thus a test of the possibility of arguing the relativity of simultaneity in both directions while the concrete experimental circumstances in the physical world are the same in both directions. Experiments, though, have not in general tested this condition. Instead, experiments testing the equations derived in the special theory concerningspacetime that relate the durations of occurrences or the length of physical existents in inertial reference frames in uniform motion relative to one anotherOn the Arbitrary Choice - 50 -have generally met one of two other conditions: Condition 1: One frame is not always inertial in nature (it is at some point in its motion accelerating); Condition 2: The test is made in only one direction, that is with one inertial frame considered the "stationary" frame and the other inertial reference frame considered the "moving" reference frame. Examples of both conditions will be discussed. This discussion of conditions 1 and 2 will demonstrate the significant attention devoted to them and place in contrast the relative lack of attention paid to empirically testing the relationshipbetween temporal duration in inertial reference frames moving in uniform translational motion relative to one another where each of the inertial reference frames in one of the two scenarios is the "stationary" frame while the frame not selected to be the "stationary" frame is the "moving" frame. 10.1Clocks Flown Around the World Hafele and Keating reported an experiment that attempted to take into account a key aspect of the twin paradox gedankenexperiment, namely where one reference frame is always considered inertial and the other cannot be considered inertial in at least part of its motion.(18,19) This experiment was a test that met condition 1. Hafele and Keating compared the time kept by the atomic time scale of the U.S. Naval Observatory with the time kept by four cesium clocks that were flown around the world in jet aircraft. In one trip, the clocks were flown eastward around the world, and in another trip, they were flown westward around the world. On each trip, the clocks were thus involved in a round trip, which is a central aspect of the twin paradox. Hafele and Keating introduced a hypothetical inertial reference frame that was, of course, not rotating. Using the special theory, specifically variations of equations 1 and 2 (the equations that relate the durations of an occurrence in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another), as well as takinginto account other considerations specific to their experiment including a generalrelativistic consideration, Hafele and Keating developed predictions concerningtime differences between the time kept by the U.S. Naval Observatory and the four cesium clocks on their two trips. They considered both the U.S. Naval Observatory as well as the clocks circumnavigating the earth as part of rotatingreference frames relative to the hypothetical inertial reference frame. ThoughOn the Arbitrary Choice - 51 -these rotating reference frames experienced acceleration, Hafele and Keating maintained that the rotating reference frames could, in essence, constitute inertial reference frames traveling in a uniform translational manner relative to ahypothetical inertial reference frame. Thus, the relation between the duration ofan occurrence in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another would be applicable to these rotating reference frames. Essentially, they considered the hypothetical inertial reference frame the "stationary" reference frame and the rotating reference frames as "moving" reference frames. The experimental results confirmed their predictions. It should be emphasized, though, that their experiment concerned the twin paradox gedankenexperiment specifically and not the type of circumstanceof concern here. It should also be emphasized that this was an indirect test as clocks in the hypothetical inertial reference frame were not involved in the experimental measurement. Both the clocks in their circumnavigation of the world and the U.S. Naval Observatory were in accelerating reference frames, reference frames for which the special theory, in general, does not provide an adequate description. The central point for Hafele and Keating though, is that as noted, the twin paradox involves one twin changing direction during his travel and the return of this twin to the other twin. And for Hafele and Keating,the clocks on the airplanes as well as the atomic time scale of the U.S. Naval Observatory are considered to have taken a roundtrip relative to the hypotheticalclocks in the inertial reference frame that have remained "stationary." 10.2The Lifetime of m-mesons Consider condition 2 where the the experiment has been conducted with only one of the inertial reference frames considered the "stationary" frame and the other inertial reference frame considered the "moving" frame. Following work by Rossi and Hall(20), Frisch and Smith (21) used the distribution of m- meson decay as a clock. As far as we know the probability of the radioactive decay of subatomic particles, and thus the average time they survive before decaying, is set by forces entirely internal to their structure. Therefore, any dependence of the decay probability of radioactive particles on their speed is an example of a generalproperty of clocks in motion relative to an observer. (22) Specifically, Frisch and Smith determined the decay distribution over time for m-mesons in the earth's atmosphere after they are brought to rest in anOn the Arbitrary Choice - 52 -inertial reference frame. Using this decay distribution, Frisch and Smith developed predictions both with and without time dilation concerning the number of m-mesons traveling at an average velocity of 0.99c (where c is the velocity of light) that would survive a journey of 1907 meters downward through the atmosphere to near sea level. In one experimental trial, for example, instead of the 27 m-mesons predicted to survive the journey out of a total of 568 m-mesons if there were no time dilation, 412 m-mesons survived the journey. Using the m-meson decay distribution as a clock, this number of surviving m-mesons indicated an elapsed time of 0.7 msec. as compared to an elapsed time of 6.4 msec., which is the quotient of the 1907 meters traveled divided by the velocity of the m-mesons (i.e., in this case 0.9552c). The observed result indicated that the m-meson clocks were " running slow by a factor of about nine" relative to the laboratory reference frame.(23) Various possible problematic factors, such as the deceleration of the m-mesons through the atmosphere, were well accounted for by Frisch and Smith. Using their data in a different manner to that described above, Frisch and Smith derived a more accurate value for the time dilation in their experiment and found an observed time dilation factor of 8.8 + 0.8. The predicted time dilation factor based on the special theory for their experiment was 1/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 = 8.4 + 2. Though it sounds odd to mention, Frisch and Smith did not address the point that theoretically the m-mesons could be considered to have been at rest in "stationary" inertial reference frames and that the laboratory reference frame is the "moving" inertial reference frame. In this scenario, the laboratory reference frame, including the people in it, would be aging very slowly, roughly 8.5 times slower than when the laboratory reference frame on earth is considered the "stationary" reference frame at rest. If equation 1 is used to describe the relation between the temporal durations in the "stationary" frame of the laboratory reference frame and the "moving" frame of the m-mesons, equation 2 would be the appropriate equation for relating temporal durations in these inertial reference frames in the reverse scenario that Frisch and Smith did not consider. In their discussion of the m-meson decay experiment, Feynman, Leighton, and Sands(24) also did not discuss the theoretical possibility of an alternative scenario along the lines indicated above. French(25) did consider that the reciprocal scenario is theoretically possible. He did so in order to demonstrate that the number of decays in both scenarios would need to be the same. French wanted to uphold the tenet that physical description for observers at rest in their respective inertial referenceOn the Arbitrary Choice - 53 -frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another is equivalent. French did not consider the reciprocal scenario in order to emphasize the point that slower aging in the laboratory reference frame on earth (when it is considered the "moving" reference frame) is just as likely as slower aging, and thus rate of decay, of the m-mesons when the laboratory reference frame is considered the "stationary" reference frame. 10.3 A Test in Both Directions It is predicted that, in accordance with the special theory, if a test were made concerning the relative rate of clocks in two inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another, one would find that the rateof the clock at rest in one inertial reference frame is slower to observers at rest in the other inertial reference frame by exactly the same amount as a clock at restin this latter frame is slower to observers at rest in the former inertial frame. Observers at rest in an inertial frame A would find clocks at rest in inertial frameB, moving in a uniform translational manner relative to A, run slow relative to clocks in A by exactly the same amount that clocks at rest in B run slow for observers at rest in A. It seems that if the ingenuity that has been devoted to developing tests of the twin paradox or time dilation in one direction were directed toward developing empirical tests of time dilation in both directions (i.e., in which each of the inertial reference frames is in one scenario the "stationary" reference frame), empirical tests could be developed. One specific possibility will be discussed shortly. This prediction of time dilation in both directions is the basis for an empirical test of the relationship of temporal durations for some occurrence in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another in both directions. It is the basis for a test of the possibility of arguing the relativity of simultaneity in both directions while the concrete experimental circumstances in the physical world are the same. Here is one scenario that would test this prediction concerning the relative rates of clocks in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. The test is indirect but, nonetheless, conclusive.This scenario relies on the Doppler effect in the special theory. Allow that two inertial reference frames (W and W') with observers at rest in each inertial frame (O and O', respectively) move away from one anotherin a uniform translational manner relative to one another. Let there be identically constructed cesium clocks at rest in one or the other of these inertialOn the Arbitrary Choice - 54 -reference frames. Whenever a specific unit of time is measured by the clocks at rest in their respective inertial frames (for example, one hour), let a light pulse be emitted in the direction of the other inertial reference frame along the axis of uniform translational motion of the inertial reference frames relative to one another. The longitudinal Doppler effect in the special theory predicts that the relation of the frequencies measured by the observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames has two possible forms. One form of the longitudinal Doppler effect is: f' = f ((c - v)/(c + v)) 1/2 (11) where c is the invariant velocity of light in inertial reference frames, v is the uniform translational velocity of the inertial reference frames relative to one another, f' is the frequency of the light pulses measured by O' at rest in W' that emanate from the clock at rest in W, and f is the frequency of the light pulses from the clock at rest in W determined by O at rest in W. The other form for the longitudinal Doppler effect is:f = f' ((c - v)/(c + v)) 1/2 (12) where f is the frequency of the light pulses measured by O at rest in W that emanate from the clock at rest in W', and f' is the frequency of the light pulses from the clock at rest in W' determined by O' at rest in W'. The longitudinal Doppler effect in the special theory is reciprocal. That the relationship in the special theory between temporal durations of an occurrence in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative toone another is a factor in the longitudinal Doppler effect can be seen in the general formulation of the Doppler effect in the special theory. One version of this general formulation is: f' = (f (1 - v 2/c2)1/2)/(1 - (v/c)(cos Q)) (13) where the light pulses emanating from the clock at rest in W are being considered and cos is the angle of the light ray in W relative to the axis along which W and W' are in uniform translational motion relative to one another. Inthe case of the longitudinal Doppler effect where the clock is at rest in W and the observer at rest in W' are moving away from one another, Q = p and cos Q = -1. Thus: f' = (f (1 - v 2/c2)1/2)/(1 + v/c) (14) f' = (f (1 + v/c) 1/2 (1 - v/c)1/2)/(1 + v/c)On the Arbitrary Choice - 55 -f' = (f (1 - v/c) 1/2)/(1 + v/c) 1/2 f' = f ((c - v)/(c + v)) 1/2 (11) One finds the term, (1 - v 2/c2)1/2, in equation 13, a term that is also found in equations 1 and 2 relating the temporal durations of an occurrence in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. Where cos = /2, equation 13 becomes: f' = f (1 - v 2/c2)1/2 (15) and the time dilation effect becomes more apparent in what is known as the transverse Doppler effect. That is, the slower rate of the "moving" clock in W' by the factor (1 - v 2/c2)1/2 accounts for the difference in frequencies of the light pulses emitted by the clock at rest in W for O at rest in W and O' at rest inW'. Where v << c, the factor (1 - v 2/c2)1/2 is very close to 1 and time dilation can be considered a negligible factor in the Doppler effect. Thus: f' = (f (1 - v 2/c2)1/2)/(1 - (v/c)(cos Q)) (13) f' » (f)/(1 - (v/c)(cos Q)) f' » (f)(1 + (v/c)(cos Q)) (16) Equation 16 takes a form of the non-relativistic Doppler effect. Consider the following scenario that is adapted from a version of the twin paradox experiment proposed by Darwin (26) and discussed by Resnick.(27) Two spaceships (A and B) are at rest in space far from any large body. In each spaceship there is an observer at rest. Each spaceship has identically constructed cesium clocks. Let the spaceships move in a uniform translational manner relative to one another and apart from one another. Let each cesium clock emit a light pulse after an hour has elapsed according to the time of the inertial frame in which a clock is at rest. Then both equations 11 and 12 above will hold, depending on which observer at rest in his reference frame is measuring the frequency of the light pulses emitted from the cesium clock at rest in the other spaceship. Allow that the uniform translational velocity is 0.8c. Then equation 11 becomes: f' = f ((c - 0.8c)/(c + 0.8c)) 1/2 f' = f ((0.2c)/(1.8c)) 1/2On the Arbitrary Choice - 56 -f' = (0.111) 1/2 f f' = 0.333 f . In a similar manner, equation 12 becomes: f = f' ((c - 0.8c)/(c + 0.8c)) 1/2 , and one can derive that: f = 0.333 f' . When an observer in one of the spaceships measures the frequency of pulses emitted by the clock at rest in the other spaceship, the frequency of the pulses will be 0.333 that found by the observer in the other spaceship when thislatter observer measures the frequency of the light pulses emitted by the clock atrest in his spaceship. This is what is indicated in Figure 13 over three unit time periods for observers in both spaceships as measured by clocks at rest in their respective inertial reference frames. Thus the observer in spaceship B receives a light pulse from spaceship A once every three units of time as time is measured in B while A measures the frequency of the light pulses emitted by the clock at rest in A as one pulse per unit of time. In a reciprocal manner, the observer in spaceship A receives a light pulse from spaceship B once every three units of time as time is measured in A while B measures the frequency of the light pulses emitted by the clock at rest in B as one pulse per unit of time. The frequency of the light pulses measured by an observer at rest in one of thespaceships that emanate from the clock at rest in the other spaceship will also be0.333 the rate of the pulses emitted by the identically constructed clock at rest inhis own inertial reference frame. It is this clock at rest in his own inertial reference frame that the observer uses to determine the frequency of the light pulses from the other clock. Only a part of the longitudinal Doppler effect is due to time dilation. The time dilation factor in equation 13 is (1 - v 2/c2)1/2 . Given a uniform translational velocity of 0.8c: (1 - v2/c2)1/2 = (1 - (0.8c) 2/c2))1/2 (1 - v2/c2)1/2 = (1 - (0.64c 2)/(c2))1/2 (1 - v2/c2)1/2 = 0.6 . If time dilation did not effect the special relativistic Doppler effect in the proposed gedankenexperiment: f' = (f (1 - v 2/c2)1/2)/(1 + v/c) (14)On the Arbitrary Choice - 57 -world line of spaceship A space axis in the inertial frame of spaceship A123456789 123456789time axis in the inertial frame of spaceship Bworld line of spaceship B space axis in the inertial frame of spaceship Btime axis in the inertial frame of spaceship A 123 45 67 89123456789 Figure 13. Spacetime diagram of world lines of light pulses from cesium clocks at rest in spaceship A and spaceship B.On the Arbitrary Choice - 58 -f' = f/(1 + (v/c)) (17) f' = f/(1 + ((0.8c)/(c))f' = f/1.8f' = 0.555 f . Using (1 - v 2/c2)1/2 = 0.6 in equation 14, one obtains: f' = (0.6 f)/(1.8)f' = 0.333 f . One can see that the impact of time dilation on the longitudinal Doppler effect in the gedankenexperiment is significant. At a uniform relative velocity of 10 km per sec, though, the contribution of time dilation to the longitudinal Doppler effect would be difficult, although perhaps possible, to detect. It is simpler to use the transverse Doppler effect (i.e., equation 15). This way any difference between the frequencies of the light pulses emitted by one of the cesium clocks at rest in its respective spaceship that are recorded by observers at rest in spaceships A and B would bedue to time dilation. Instead of the light pulses traveling along the axis of uniform translational motion relative to one another, the light pulses would travel orthogonally to this axis in the reference frame in which the clock that emitted the light flash is at rest. With a uniform translational velocity v = 10 x 10 3 m/sec: (1 - v2/c2)1/2= (1 - (10 x 10 3 m/sec)2/ (2.99792458 x 10 8 m/sec)2)1/2 (1 - v2/c2)1/2= (1 - (1.0 x 10 8 m/sec)/ (8.987551787 x 10 16 m/sec))1/2 . In a binomial expansion to second order: (1 - v2/c2)1/2 = 1 - 5.563 x 10 -10 . This value is very close to 1. Nonetheless, the impact of the difference between this value and 1, on the order of 10 -10, indicates that the transverse Doppler effect in equation 15 is large enough so that the difference in frequencies can bedetected with the use of cesium clocks. In a suitable arrangement of the spaceships, observers at rest in each spaceship using cesium clocks at rest in their respective spaceships could bothOn the Arbitrary Choice - 59 -detect the transverse Doppler effect. These observers would find that the frequency of the light pulses emitted from the other "moving" spaceship would be less than the frequency of the light pulses emitted by the cesium clock at restin their own spaceship. Because this transverse Doppler effect would depend only on time dilation, this result would confirm that time dilation occurs in a reciprocal manner for observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames. The distance between the spaceships along the orthogonal axis which the light pulses travel would need to be large enough to assure that the different frequencies measured by observers at rest in their respective spaceships were indeed reflecting only a transverse Doppler effect, not confounded by other wave effects (due to what will be called wave compression/expansion components). A large enough distance would allow for enough time between the change from the blue shift to the red shift as one spaceship passes the other along an orthogonal to the axis of uniform translational motion relative to one another to detect a transverse Doppler effect. Following is a deduction of the required distance. Figure 14 presents one possible representation of the experiment where the observer at rest in spaceship A considers spaceship B to be in uniform translational motion with velocity v relative to spaceship A. Let the time t = 0 at the instant that spaceshipB lies along an orthogonal axis to the axis of uniform translational motion of spaceships A and B relative to one another. In this case, Q = p/2. As shown in Figure 14, after spaceship B has traveled the distance v Dt in the brief time Dt: a=p - b. Then: a= p/2 - b a= p/2 - p + Q a= Q - p/2 . Rearranging terms, one obtains: Q= a + p/2 . Taking the cosine of both sides of the equation, one obtains: cos Q= cos (a + p/2)On the Arbitrary Choice - 60 -•vDt b •spaceship Apath of spaceship B in uniform translational motion relativeto spaceship A •spaceship B at t = 0spaceship B at t = Dt light pulse emitted from cesiumclock at rest inspaceship B at t < 0• light pulseemitted from cesiumclock at rest inspaceship B at t = DtQ b a Figure 14. Transverse Doppler effect experiment where spaceship B is considered "moving" relative to spaceship A.On the Arbitrary Choice - 61 -cos Q= -sin a. a is small when Dt is small. When a is small: sin a»tan a sin a»vDt/b where b is the distance along the orthogonal axis separating the spaceships. Thus: cos Q»-vDt/b . The wave compression/expansion component of the special relativistic Doppler effect expressed in equation 13 is1/(1 - (v/c)(cos )). Thus for a small and a small amount of time Dt: 1/(1 - (v/c)(cos )) »1/(1 + (v/c)(v Dt/b)) »1 - (v/c)(v Dt/b) . The wave compression/expansion component for a small value of and Dt is v2Dt/cb . As noted, the time dilation component in equation 13 is (1 - v 2/c2)1/2 . With v << c, by the binomial expansion to second order: (1 - v2/c2)1/2 » 1 - 1/2 v2/c2 where the difference from 1 is 1/2 v 2/c2 . As can be seen from an inspection of equation 13, the time dilation component needs to be greater than the wave compression/expansion component in order to insure that the time dilation component is a major factor in the measured Doppler shift. Essentially, this means that the following relation should hold for the condition v << c: 1/2 v2/c2 > v2Dt/cb . Then: b > 2cDt . Since essentially the same analysis applies to the approach of spaceship B to an orthogonal axis with spaceship A, the measurement time T = 2 Dt or Dt = T/2. Then our result is: b > cT . If, for example, the experiment can be conducted in 1 second, with T = 1 sec, then b would need to be greater than 1 light-sec. If the experiment can beOn the Arbitrary Choice - 62 -conducted in 0.001 sec, then b would need to be greater than 0.001 light-sec, or about 300 km. 11. Conclusion An exploration of a variation of the twin paradox leads to interesting results concerning the impact of the argument concerning the relativity of simultaneity in the special theory on the structure and functioning of thephysical world. It has been shown that the same physical circumstances can support the relativity of simultaneity being argued in either of two directions with accompanying distinct sets of empirical results. The expression of this argument in the physical world relies upon an observer who considers himself at rest in an inertial reference frame and considers his or her reference frame "stationary," or at rest. This reliance extends to other results in the special theory because these other results depend on the relativity of simultaneity. The argument on the relativity of simultaneity also provides a rationale for an observer considering himself at rest in an inertial reference frame, this inertial reference frame in which he is at rest "stationary," and another inertial reference frame in uniform translational motion relative to him "moving." Thus, in the special theory there is a role for a cognitive element influencing the structure, including the spatiotemporal structure, and functioning of the physical world. This conclusion is supported by the freely made decision noted in the special theory on the part of an individual as regardsthe direction in which to argue the relativity of simultaneity. Because this choice is not constrained by any physical factor in the special theory, it is also itself not reducible to any physical substrate. In the special theory, it is predicted that observers at rest in their respective inertial reference frames which they consider to be "stationary," or atrest, and which are in uniform translational motion relative to one another, will find that the clocks at rest in the other observers' inertial reference frame will run slower and that they will run slower by exactly the same amount. This basic prediction of the special theory has not been subjected to the same degreeof empirical scrutiny as the twin paradox or a one-way empirical test, such as the m-meson experiment discussed.An interesting result concerning the light flashes used in establishing simultaneity in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another in a variation of Einstein's 1917 argument on the relativity of simultaneity was pointed out that serves to emphasize the consequences in the physical world of the particular direction thatOn the Arbitrary Choice - 63 -is arbitrarily chosen by an individual in arguing the relativity of simultaneity. It is proposed that empirical tests in two directions (i.e., with each of the inertial reference frames the "stationary" reference frame in one scenario andthe reference frame not designated the "stationary" reference frame is the"moving" reference frame) be developed and conducted. If empirical results from such tests support the predictions of the special theory, these empirical results would, in addition, support the thesis that there is a cognitive factor in inthe argument on the relativity of simultaneity that affects results derived in the special theory concerning the structure and functioning of the physical world. It is expected that empirical tests in both directions concerning time dilation will support the predictions of the special theory. One such test is proposed.On the Arbitrary Choice - 64 -Acknowledgement I thank Dr. Art Huffman for his significant contribution to the development of the proposed experiment involving the transverse Doppler effect in the special theory.On the Arbitrary Choice - 65 -Endnotes 1It appears Einstein maintained that the observer in the reference frame that at some point in its motion experienced acceleration would indeed have the clocks that ran more slowly. For example, in his original paper on the special theory, he first demonstrated the phenomenon of time dilation. He then wrote: From this [time dilation] there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K [the "stationary" reference frame] there are stationary clocks which, viewed in thestationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by (1/2)tv 2/c2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B. It is at once apparent that this result still holds good if the clock moves from A to B in any polygonal line, and also when the points A and B coincide. If we assume that the result proved for a polygonal line is also valid for a continuously curved line, we arrive at this result:if one of two synchronous clocks A is moved in a closed curve with constant velocity until it returns to A, the journey lasting t seconds, then by the clock which has remained at rest the travelled clock on its arrival at A will be (1/2)tv 2/c2 second [sic] slow.(28) In another context, Kopff quoted Einstein from "The Relativity Theory," an article that appeared in Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Zürich, Vierteljahresschrift , volume 56, and was published in 1911. Kopff first noted that: The consequences deduced from the Lorentz transformation for the passage of clocks apply naturally to the temporal occurrence of arbitrary events. An example which brings out the relations with great clarity is given by Einstein. (29) According to Kopff, Einstein wrote the following: If we placed a living organism in a box, and made it carry through the same to-and-fro motions as the clocks formerly did,On the Arbitrary Choice - 66 -then one could arrange that this organism, after any arbitrary lengthy flight, could be returned to its original spot in a scarcely altered condition, while corresponding organisms which had remained in their original positions had already long since givenway to new generations. For the moving organism, the lengthy time of the journey was a mere instant, provided the motion tookplace with approximately the velocity of light. (30) But the question then arises why did Einstein also maintain that a train traveling with uniform velocity along an embankment and then experiencing anon-uniform motion for a brief period of time, such as the application of the brakes, could be considered an inertial reference frame throughout its motion, albeit one that experienced a gravitational field at a certain time? Einstein wrote: It is certainly true that the observer in the railway carriage experiences a jerk forwards as a result of the application of the brake, and that he recognises in this non-uniformity of motion (retardation) of the carriage. But he is compelled by nobody to refer this jerk to a "real" acceleration (retardation) of the carriage. He might also interpret his experience thus: "My body of reference (the carriage) remains permanently at rest. With reference to it, however, there exists (during the period of application of the brakes) a gravitational field which is directed forwards and which is variable with respect to time. Under the influence of this field, the embankment together with the earth moves non-uniformly in such a manner that their original velocity in the backwards direction is continuously reduced." (31) This idea is the basis for the principle of equivalence, one statement of which is that inertial and non-inertial reference frames are equivalent with regard to the expression of physical law.(32) In the scenario proposed by Einstein, the train is an inertial reference frame that at some point in time experiences a gravitational field, and this field is associated with the embankment, along with the earth, constituting an accelerating reference frame relative to an observer at rest on the train. Holton(33) in "Resource Letter SRT-1 on Special Relativity Theory," wrote that Terrell (34) provided "perhaps the best of the recent reviews" of time dilation and clock problems. In his article, Terrell, though arguing that there is indeed only one twin that will experience time dilation, allowed for the idea thatOn the Arbitrary Choice - 67 -is the basis for the principle of equivalence, but notes that it is improbable. In his version of the twin paradox, Terrell wrote: An alternative which B [the "moving" observer with the clocks at rest in his inertial frame] could choose is to apply the general theory of relativity and assume himself to have been unaccelerated throughout these events. He could, because of theprinciple of equivalence, account for all observed effects by introducing moving gravitational fields having the nature ofplane shock waves, which passed him coincidentally with his application of rocket power (or whatever produced his accelerations as observed by A.) Thus observer B could assumehimself to have remained stationary while A and the rest of the universe were accelerated. However this would be a somewhatcomplicated, coincidental, and physically implausibleexplanation, although it would agree with the general theory of relativity and would account for all the observations discussed. (35) It should be noted that there are some fundamental theoretical problems with the conventional solutions proposed to the twin paradox. First, is Einstein's discussion of the railway carriage as the "stationary" frame not implausible? Isit substantially less implausible that an observer on a train sees himself as in the"stationary" frame and the earth as the "moving" frame than Terrell's or anyone else's explanation of the twin paradox? Einstein's idealized example is at the heart of the principle of equivalence. Second, given that the "moving" observertravels for a much longer time in an inertial reference frame relative to the "stationary" observer compared to the time he spends in an accelerating reference frame (during the time the "moving" observer is turning around), howis it that the inertial motion of the "moving" observer over the long period of time gets set, so speak, as really moving by the comparatively very brief acceleration? As this acceleration sets the "moving" twin as really moving, whyis there no substantial influence on the time dilation effect which is determined in the large part by the temporal relations for two inertial reference frames moving in a uniform translational manner relative to one another? 2The essence of the derivation of the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations is that there is a comparison between: 1) the invariant velocity of lightin all inertial reference frames, and 2) the magnitude of the uniform translationalvelocity of two inertial reference frames relative to one another. One of the twoOn the Arbitrary Choice - 68 -inertial reference frames in uniform motion relative to one another is designated the "stationary" reference frame, and it is from this reference frame that the other frame is considered "moving" with the uniform translational velocity. This is also the essence of the argument on the relativity of simultaneity, as willbe shown. (The designation of the reference frame as "stationary" means essentially that simultaneity is first established in it in the argument on the relativity of simultaneity, even though it might be considered "stationary" because it is the reference frame from which the other reference frame is considered "moving". This is because in Newtonian mechanics, built upon absolute simultaneity, the designation of one or the other of two inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another as the "stationary" frame does not have the same significance that it does in the specialtheory. For example, in the kinematics underlying Newtonian mechanics, spatial lengths of physical existents and the temporal duration of occurrencesare the same in both of the inertial frames regardless of which frame is designated the "stationary" reference frame. With regard to these and other essential features of the physical world, in Newtonian mechanics the role of "stationary" and "moving" reference frames can be freely exchanged without affecting the results of measurements. It has been shown that this is not the case in the special theory, and it is the relativity of simultaneity that is responsible for this. Thus, the relativity of simultaneity is indeed the key to designating an inertial reference frame as "stationary".) 3There is a difference developing the spatial, as opposed to temporal, relations between inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another. In spatial relations, one needs to simultaneously determine the ends of whatever is being measured for spatial length in order to determine this length. If one knows the spatial length of an existent at rest in one inertial frame, one can then follow the world lines of the ends of this existent until they intersect with the time axis of the other inertial frame (which represents simultaneous spatial positions in this reference frame). In the case oftemporal relations between these inertial frames, the concern is with measuring temporal durations, that themselves are based on simultaneity in each of the frames, but which, of course do not require that the beginning and end time measurements in a frame be taken simultaneously in that frame. Rather, the concern is with what time a clock at rest in the "stationary" frame will record corresponding to a clock at rest in the "moving" frame. 4Einstein noted the reciprocal manner in which space contraction couldOn the Arbitrary Choice - 69 -be argued. He wrote: We envisage a rigid sphere* of radius R, at rest relatively to the moving system k [which is moving relative to K, the stationary system, along the axis x for K and along the axis for k], and with its centre at the origin of co-ordinates of k....Thus whereas the Y and Z dimensions [that is, along the y and z axes in K] donot appear modified by the motion, the X dimension [that is, the x axis in K] appears shortened in the ratio 1: Ö(1 - v2/c2), i.e., the greater the value of v the greater the shortening....It is clear that the same results hold good of [sic] bodies at rest in the "stationary" system [K], viewed from a system in uniform motion [k]. * That is, a body possessing spherical form when examined at rest.(36) 5One can derive equations 7 and 8 from 5 and 6 and vice versa. But these possibilities of derivation do not negate the point that: 1) in the derivation of equations 5 and 6 one of two inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another is designated the "stationary" reference frame and the other inertial reference frame is designated the "moving" reference frame; 2) in the derivation of equations 7 and 8, that reference frame designated "moving" in the derivation of equations 5 and 6 is now the "stationary" reference frame and that reference frame designated "stationary" in the derivation of equations 5 and 6 is now the "moving" reference frame. That is, in either derivation, the time of one inertial reference frame is logically delineated as first, and it is not assumed in the special theory that the time in the other frame will be the same. (That is, the assumption is notmade that time is absolute.) It is found that due to the relativity of simultaneity for inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another, the time of one reference frame is not the same as that of the other frame. In Newtonian mechanics, relying on the Galilean coordinate transformation, t' = t so that the derivation of the designation of "stationary" and "moving" inertial frames in the analogous sets of equations is inconsequential. It is inconsequential for the Galilean coordinate transformationitself or for the relation between the temporal durations of an event or the spatiallength of a physical existent in the inertial reference frames. That is, in Newtonian mechanics:On the Arbitrary Choice - 70 -x' = x - vt (11) and x = x' + vt' (12) As noted, the time relation is t' = t. Thus equation 11 transforms to equation 12 simply in the following way. From equation 11, x = x' + vt . Through substitution from t' = t, x = x' + vt' . In Newtonian mechanics, clearly the duration of an occurrence in the two inertial reference frames is the same. And it follows from the time relation, t' = t, that the length of an object in the two frames is the same. From equation 11, it follows that: Dx' = Dx - vDt . As Dt' = Dt, if Dt = 0, Dx' = Dx Or, using equation 12, one finds in the same manner that: Dx = Dx' . 6Another argument concerning the dependence of the Lorentz coordinate transformation equations on the relativity of simultaneity is presentedbelow. It has been shown how spatial length and temporal duration in inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another depend on the relativity of simultaneity. The Lorentz coordinate transformation equations can be considered a special case of the equations expressing spatiotemporal relations between the inertial reference frames. One set of spatiotemporal relations between inertial reference frames in uniform translational motion relative to one another is given by: Dt = Dt'/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (2) and Dx = Dx'(1 - v2/c2) (4). Consider the Lorentz coordinate transformation equation: x' = (x - vt)/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 (7).On the Arbitrary Choice - 71 -x' may be said to stand for Dx' in equation 7, specifically where x1' = 0 and x2' = x'. Similarly, x may be said to stand for Dx in this equation, where x1 = 0 and x 2 = x. Let t 1 be the time coordinate corresponding to x 1 and t2 be the time coordinate corresponding to x 2. If x then does represent a length in W, t1 = t2. Then equation 7 becomes: x = x'(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 (11) or, in more familiar terms, Dx = Dx'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (4). That it is possible for t 1 = t2 = 0 for any values of x 1 and x2, or Dx, is clear, for t1, t2, which equal 0, are the time coordinate for the x axis in W. Equation 11 relates space in W and W' as this equation relates the x axis of W and the x' axis of W' where W is considered the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W' is considered the "moving" inertial reference frame. Similar reasoning can be followed in showing thatt' = [t - (v/c 2)x]/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (8) can represent a specific form of the relation for time denoted by Dt = Dt'/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (2). Specifically, let t' represent the difference Dt' between t 1' = 0 and t 2' = t' and t represent the difference Dt between t 1 = 0 and t 2 = t. x can represent the difference Dx between x 1 = 0 and x 2 = x, where x 1 is the space coordinate associated with t 1 and x2 is the space coordinate associated with t 2. In deriving the temporal relation, though, the concern is that the clock is at rest in W' and not at rest in W. That is, W is the "stationary" frame and W' is the "moving" frame in which the clock moving with regard to W is at rest in W'. (In the case of spatial length, even though the rod is at rest in W', nonetheless, in order to determine the length of the rod in W, the ends of the "moving" rod must be determined in W simultaneously, that is simultaneously in accordance with the time in W. This condition is not applicable with regard to time.) Thus, we want x'1 = x'2, where x' 1 corresponds to x 1 and x'2 corresponds to x 2. Then, considering the general derivation from before concerning temporal duration: t1=[ t1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2] + [[v/c2][x1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt1]]On the Arbitrary Choice - 72 -and t2=[ t2'(1 - v2/c2)1/2] + [[v/c2][x1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt2]] . With these two equations, one can derive: t2 - t1= [[t2'(1 - v2/c2)1/2] + [[v/c2][x1' (1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt2]]] - [[t1'(1 - v2/c2)1/2] + [[v/c2][x1' (1 - v2/c2)1/2 + vt1]]] and finally, with arithmetic: t2 - t1 = (t2' - t1')/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 . Since t1 = 0 and t 1' = 0: t = t'/(1 - v 2/c2)1/2 (12) or in more familiar terms, Dt = Dt'/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (2). That it is possible for x 1' = x2' = 0 for any values of t 1' and t2', or Dt', is clear, for x 1', x2', which equal 0, are the space coordinate for the t' axis in W'. Equation 12 relates time in W and W' as this equation relates the t axis of W and the t' axis of W' where W is considered the "stationary" inertial reference frame and W' is considered the "moving" inertial reference frame. 7Furthermore, Einstein himself explicitly acknowledged that c - v is a velocity. As an example, in deriving the Lorentz transformation equations in his original paper on the special theory, Einstein discussed a "stationary" inertial system K and a "moving" inertial system k moving in a uniform translational manner relative to one another. Concerning a ray of light moving in the same direction that k is moving relative to K, Einstein (37) wrote: But the ray [of light] moves relatively to the initial point of k [the "moving" system], when measured in the stationary system [K],with the velocity c - v, so that x' ------- = t . c - vOn the Arbitrary Choice - 73 -x' is the distance traveled by the ray of light in K, and t is the time taken in K to traverse this distance with the velocity c - v. In another translation of a large section of Einstein's paper, Schwartz (38) translates the textual part of the above quote from Einstein as: But, as measured in the stationary system, the ray moves with velocity V - v relative to the origin of k, so that we have x'/(V - v) = t. V here is the invariant velocity of light in all inertial reference frames. It might also be argued that in order to demonstrate the relativity of simultaneity, it is only necessary that the observer considered "stationary" (i.e., the observer in whose frame simultaneity, or the synchronization of clocks, is first established in accordance with one of Einstein's definitions) be aware of the effective velocities c - v and c + v of the lightning flashes relative to the "moving" observer (in the case of the train gedankenexperiment, the observer Ot on the train). If this thesis were correct, there would be an inconsistency in Einstein's arguments because Einstein did not note explicitly any exceptions to the postulate of the special theory of relativity that the velocity of light is invariant in inertial reference frames that are in uniform translational motion relative to one another. 8There is, of course, the reversal in the direction of the velocity of the inertial reference frames in the two scenarios for arguing the relativity of simultaneity, and there is also the point that the "moving" reference frame indeed changes spatial coordinates in the "stationary" reference frame over time of the "stationary" reference frame in both scenarios, and thus has velocity in the "stationary" reference frame. The change in direction of the velocity of theinertial reference frames in uniform motion relative to one another is significantbecause it allows for switching the inertial reference frames with regard to which inertial reference frame will be the "moving" reference frame that is changing spatial coordinates and time coordinates in the "stationary" reference frame and which reference frame will be this "stationary" reference frame. But this change in the direction of the velocity of the inertial reference frames relative to one another is significant with regard to features of the physical world such as spatial length or temporal duration in the special theory, and not in Newtonian mechanics and the kinematics underlying it. It is the relativity ofsimultaneity that distinguishes the special theory from Newtonian mechanicsOn the Arbitrary Choice - 74 -and it is the logical distinction, arbitrarily decided, concerning in which inertial reference frame simultaneity will be established first in the argument that is at the heart of the argument on the relativity of simultaneity.On the Arbitrary Choice - 75 -References 1. R. Resnick, Introduction to Special Relativity (John Wiley & Sons, 1968), p. 201. 2. R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, and Heat (Vol. 1) (Addison-Wesley, 1963), p. 16-3. 3. R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, and Heat (Vol. 1) (Addison-Wesley, 1963), p. 16-3. 4. A. Einstein, Relativity, the Special and the General Theory (Bonanza, 1961, originally 1917), p. 25. 5. A. Einstein, Relativity, the Special and the General Theory (Bonanza, 1961, originally 1917), p. 32. 6. A. Grünbaum, Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964). 7. J.A. Winnie, Philos. Sci., 37, 81 (1970).8. J.A. Winnie, Philos. Sci., 37, 223 (1970).9. T.G. Franzel, Phys. Essays, 1, 184 (1988).10. A. Einstein, Relativity, the Special and the General Theory (Bonanza, 1961, originally 1917), p. 25. 11. A. Einstein, Relativity, the Special and the General Theory (Bonanza, 1961, originally 1917), p. 22. 12. A. Einstein, Relativity, the Special and the General Theory (Bonanza, 1961, originally 1917), p. 26. 13. A. Einstein, Relativity, the Special and the General Theory (Bonanza, 1961, originally 1917), p. 26. 14. A. Einstein, Relativity, the Special and the General Theory (Bonanza, 1961, originally 1917), p. 26. 15. D.M. Snyder, On Light Clocks and Periodic Phenomena in the Special Theory of Relativity , manuscript submitted for publication (1993). 16. A. Einstein, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," contained in H. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl (Eds.), The Principle of Relativity, a Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity (Dover, 1952, originally 1905), p. 40. 17. A. Einstein, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," contained in H. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl (Eds.), The Principle of Relativity, a Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity (Dover, 1952, originally 1905), p. 42. 18. J.C. Hafele, and R.E. Keating, Science, 177, 168 (1972).19. J.C. Hafele, and R.E. Keating, Science, 177, 166 (1972).20. B. Rossi, and D.B. Hall, Phys. Rev., 59 (second series), 223 (1941).21. D.H. Frisch, and J.H. Smith, Am. J. Phys., 31, 342 (1963).22. D.H. Frisch, and J.H. Smith, Am. J. Phys., 31, 343 (1963).23. D.H. Frisch, and J.H. Smith, Am. J. Phys., 31, 348 (1963).24. R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, and Heat (Vol. 1) (Addison-Wesley, 1963), p. 15-7. 25. A.P. French, Special Relativity . (W. W. Norton, 1968), p. 104.On the Arbitrary Choice - 76 -26. C.G. Darwin, Nature, 180, 976 (1957). 27. R. Resnick, Introduction to Special Relativity (John Wiley & Sons, 1968), p. 204. 28. A. Einstein, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," contained in H. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl (Eds.), The Principle of Relativity, a Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity (Dover, 1952, originally 1905), p. 49. 29. A. Kopff, The Mathematical Theory of Relativity (Methuen & Co., 1923), p. 51. 30. A. Kopff, The Mathematical Theory of Relativity (Methuen & Co., 1923), p. 52. 31. A. Einstein, Relativity, the Special and the General Theory (Bonanza, 1961, originally 1917), p. 69. 32. A. Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity . (Princeton University Press, 1956, originally 1922), p. 57. 33. G. Holton, "Resource Letter SRT-1 on Special Relativity Theory," contained in Special Relativity Theory (American Institute of Physics, 1962), p. 1. 34. J. Terrell, "Relativistic Observations and the Clock Paradox," contained in Special Relativity Theory (American Institute of Physics, 1962, originally 1960), p. 68. 35. J. Terrell, "Relativistic Observations and the Clock Paradox," contained in Special Relativity Theory (American Institute of Physics, 1962, originally 1960), p. 78. 36. A. Einstein, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," contained in H. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl (Eds.), The Principle of Relativity, a Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity (Dover, 1952, originally 1905), p. 48. 37. A. Einstein, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," contained in H. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl (Eds.), The Principle of Relativity, a Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity (Dover, 1952, originally 1905), p. 43. 38. H.M. Schwartz, Am. J. Phys., 45, 21 (1977).On the Arbitrary Choice - 77 -Appendix 1 Table I Circumstances for Deriving Set 1 and Equations 5 and 6 Set 1: Dt' = Dt/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (1); Dx' = Dx(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (3) Equations: x = (x' + vt')/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (5); t = [t' + (v/c2)x']/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (6) SCENARIO 1: Inertial Reference Frame:WW ' Logical Role in Derivation ofRelativity ofSimultaneity:"Moving" frame. Time in W' used to determinewhether criterion for simultaneitymet in W (using same light usedto establish simultaneity in W')."Stationary" frame. Simultaneity established first inthis frame. State of Motion ofRod Measured inEquation 3:Rod measured by observer at rest in W' is at rest in W. The length of this rod at rest in W is longer when measured by anobserver at rest in W than whenmeasured by an observer at rest inW'. This rod that is measured and that is of identical construction to therod at rest in W' that is used tomeasure it in W' is in Scenario 2,instead, used to measure thelength of the latter rod (the rod atrest in W') where the latter rod isthe "moving" rod.Rod measured by observer at rest in W' is "moving" relative to W'. Dx' is determined for "moving" measuring rod. Need to determinepositions of ends of rod in W'simultaneously. To measure Dx', observer at rest in W' uses rod of identicalconstruction to the rod beingmeasured. This rod used tomeasure Dx' is at rest in W'. The length of the rod "moving" in W' is shorter when measuredby an observer at rest in W' thanwhen measured by an observer atrest in W.On the Arbitrary Choice - 78 -Table I (continued) SCENARIO 1: Inertial Reference Frame:WW ' State of Motion of Clocks Measured inEquation 1:Clock (or clocks) measured by observer at rest in W' is at rest inW. The rate of this clock (or clocks) at rest in W is faster whenmeasured by an observer at rest inW than when measured by anobserver at rest in W'. This clock (or clocks) that is measured and that is (or are) ofidentical construction to theclocks at rest in W' that are usedto measure the clock (or clocks)at rest in W is in Scenario 2,instead, used to measure the rateof the latter clocks (the clocks atrest in W') where the latter clocksare the "moving" clocks.Clock (or clocks) measured by observer at rest in W' is"moving" relative to W'. Clocks at rest in W' are used to determine Dt' corresponding to Dt in W. Observers at rest in W' useclocks of identical construction tothat (or those) clock (or clocks) atrest in W that is (or are) beingmeasured. The rate of the clock (or clocks) "moving" in W' is (or are) slowerwhen measured by an observer atrest in W' than when measured byan observer at rest in W. State of Motion ofReference Frame forObserver at Rest inthat Frame:"Stationary" for observer at rest in W."Stationary" for observer at rest in W'. State of Motion ofReference Frame forObserver at Rest inOther Frame:"Moving" for observer at rest in W'."Moving" for observer at rest in W.On the Arbitrary Choice - 79 -Table II Circumstances for Deriving Set 2 and Equations 7 and 8 Set 2: Dt = Dt'/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (2); Dx = Dx'(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (4) Equations: x' = (x - vt)/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (7); t' = [t - (v/c2)x]/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 (8) SCENARIO 2: Inertial Reference Frame:WW ' Logical Role in Derivation ofRelativity ofSimultaneity:"Stationary" frame . Simultaneity established first in this frame."Moving" frame. Time in W used to determine whether criterion for simultaneitymet in W' (using same light usedto establish simultaneity in W). State of Motion ofRod Measured inEquation 4:Rod measured by observer at rest in W is "moving" relative to W. Dx is determined for "moving" measuring rod. Need to determinepositions of ends of rod in Wsimultaneously. To measure Dx, observer at rest in W uses rod of identicalconstruction to the rod beingmeasured. This rod used tomeasure Dx is at rest in W. The length of the rod "moving" in W is shorter when measured byan observer at rest in W thanwhen measured by an observer atrest in W'.Rod measured by observer at rest in W is at rest in W'. The length of this rod at rest in W' is longer when measured byan observer at rest in W' thanwhen measured by an observer atrest in W. This rod that is measured and that is of identical construction to therod at rest in W that is used tomeasure it in W is in Scenario 1,instead, used to measure thelength of the latter rod (the rod atrest in W) where the latter rod isthe "moving" rod.On the Arbitrary Choice - 80 -Table II (continued) SCENARIO 2: Inertial Reference Frame:WW ' State of Motion of Clocks Measured inEquation 2:Clock (or clocks) measured by observer at rest in W' is"moving" relative to W'. Clocks at rest in W are used to determine Dt corresponding to Dt' in W'. Observers at rest in W'use clocks of identicalconstruction to that (or those)clock (or clocks) at rest in W' thatis (or are) being measured. The rate of the clock (or clocks) "moving" in W is (or are) slowerwhen measured by an observer atrest in W than when measured byan observer at rest in W'.Clock (or clocks) measured by observer at rest in W is at rest inW'. The rate of this clock (or clocks) at rest in W' is faster whenmeasured by an observer at rest inW' than when measured by anobserver at rest in W. This clock (or clocks) that is measured and that is (or are) ofidentical construction to theclocks at rest in W that are usedto measure the clock (or clocks)at rest in W' is in Scenario 1,instead, used to measure the rateof the latter clocks (the clocks atrest in W) where the latter clocksare the "moving" clocks. State of Motion ofReference Frame forObserver at Rest inthat Frame:"Stationary" for observer at rest in W."Stationary" for observer at rest in W'. State of Motion ofReference Frame forObserver at Rest inOther Frame:"Moving" for observer at rest in W'."Moving" for observer at rest in W.

arXiv:physics/0005078v1 [physics.atom-ph] 29 May 2000Atom Interference using microfabricated structures B. Dubetsky and P. R. Berman Physics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mic higan 48109-1120, USA in ”Atom Interferometry,” P. R. Berman (ed.) (Academic, Che stnut Hill, 1997). (June 3, 1996) Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Qualitative Consideration 4 A. Fresnel Difraction 4 B. Fraunhofer Difraction 4 C. Talbot-Lau Regime 4 D. Classical Scattering 5 III. Talbot-Effect 6 A. Talbot-Effect as a Recoil Effect 6 B. Calculation of the Atomic Density Profile 7 C. Higher-Order Gratings using Talbot Technique 8 IV. Shadow Effect with Microfabricated Structures 9 A Dephasing-Rephasing Processes in Two Spatially Separate d MS 10 B. Particles Distribution Profile 12 C. Main Features 15 V. Talbot-Lau Effect Using Microfabricated Structures 16 A. Grating formation 17 B. Higher-Order Gratings Induced by MS using Talbot-Lau Tec hnique 20 C. Comparison of the Talbot and Talbot-Lau effects 23 D. Additional Examples Including a Quantum Talbot-Lau Effec t 24 VI. Talbot and Talbot-Lau Effects in a thermal Atomic beam 25 A. Atomic Density Profile for a Thermal Beam 26 VII. Conclusion 29 Appendix 30 References 32 I. INTRODUCTION In 1973, Altschuler and Frantz patented an idea for creating an atom interferometer (Altschuler and Frantz, 1973). The beam splitter in their apparatus was a standing-wave optical field. Their ideas were rekindled by Dubetsky et al. (1984), who presented detailed cal- culations of atomic scattering by standing-wave fields in the context of atom interferometry. It was not until re- cently, however, that experimentalists were successful in constructing the first atom interferometers. Double-slit interference (Carnal and Mlynek, 1991; Shimizu et al., 1992), Fraunhofer diffraction by microfabricated struc- tures (MS) (Keith et al., 1991; Ekstrom et al., 1995) or by resonant standing wave fields (SW) (Rasel et al., 1995; Giltner et al., 1995), and Fresnel diffraction by one (Chapman et al., 1995) or two (Clauser and Li, 1994) MS have all been observed using atomic beams as mat- ter waves. Two types of atom-optical elements have been used asbeam splitters in these experiments, standing wave fields or microfabricated structures. A SW beam splitter al- lows one to operate with relatively dense atomic beams, having densities up to 1010cm−3and flow densities up to 1015cm−2s−1. Moreover, by varying the atom field detuning, one can use SW beamsplitters as either am- plitude or phase gratings. Additional degrees of freedom are provided by the polarization of the field which can act selectively on targeted magnetic state sublevels. A the- ory of atom interference in standing wave fields has been developed by Altschuler and Frantz (1973) ,Dubetsky et al. (1984), Chebotayev et al. (1985), Bord´ e (1989), Friedberg and Hartmann (1993 ,1993a), Dubetsky and Berman (1994) and Janicke and Wilkens (1994). In con- trast to SW beam splitters, MS usually scatter atoms in a state independent manner; as a consequence, most ex- periments involving MS use atoms in their ground (or, possibly, metastable) states. Microfabricated structure s provide 100% modulation of the incident atomic beam. They offer the additional advantage that their period and 1duty cycle (ratio of slit opening to period) can be cho- sen arbitrarily within the limits of current lithographic technology. A theory of atom interference using MS has been developed by Turchette et al. (1992) ,Clauser and Reinsch (1992) and Carnal et al. (1995) . Both the splitting of an atomic beam into two or more beams coherent with respect to one another and the re- combining of the scattered beams are physical processes that are essential to the operation of an atom interfer- ometer. We consider scattering of atoms by an ideal MS, having an infinite number of slits, period d, duty cycle f, and 100% transmission through the slits. Each MS is normal to the y-axis, and the slits are oriented in the z- direction, so that the axis of the MS is in the x-direction (see Fig. 1). p+k p d=kMS ScreengratingprofileAtomicdL MS ScreengratingprofileAtomick v0 v=0v=(v=0,u) v=(v0,u)yxp p x(a) (b) FIG. 1. Matter-wave interference ( a) and shadow effect ( b) for a collimated atomic beam incident on a microfabricated structure ( MS).(a) When an atom having given center of mass momentum p/bardblˆ yscatters from a MS having wave vec- tork=2πˆ x/d,where dis the period of the MS, the output wave function consists of a set of momenta states p+n¯hk (two of them |p/an}bracketri}htand|p+¯hk/an}bracketri}htare shown). A superposition of these states’ wave functions leads to an interference pat - tern on the screen, having the same period das the MS’s. (b) When a collimated beam of particles moving along classi- cal trajectories scatters from MS, the beam profile imprinte d by MS is copied on the screen. A beam consisting of two velocity subgoups, having zero ( v= 0) and nonzero ( v/ne}ationslash= 0) velocity projections on the x−axis is shown. Gratings associ- ated with these two subgroups are shifted on the screen from on another by ∆ x=vt=v uL,where tis the time of flight between the MS and the screen. After scattering from a MS, each in-coming atomic stateψhavingx-component of center-of-mass momen- tumpsplits into a set of out-going states ψnhavingx- components of momenta p+n¯hk(k= 2π/d, n is aninteger) which evolve as ψn∝exp/bracketleftbiggi ¯h(p+n¯hk)x/bracketrightbigg . (1) Interference of two components, such as ψ0andψ1,on a screen (see Fig. 1a) leads to an atomic density grating ρ∝Re[ψ0ψ∗ 1] = cos[kx] (2) having the same period das the MS. Observation of this grating in the experiments listed above often has been considered as direct evidence for matter-wave interference. Nevertheless, one can easily see that such a conclusion is not necessarily justified. For particles moving along classical trajectories (Fig. 1b), and for a beam whose angular divergence is sufficiently small to satisfy θb≪d L, (3) whereLis a distance on the order of the distance be- tween the MS and the screen, a shadow of the MS can be seen on the screen at distances Lwhere all matter- wave effects are completely negligible. This example is the simplest manifestation of the classical shadow effect (Chebotayev et al., 1985; Dubetsky and Berman 1994). To distinguish quantum matter-wave interference from the classical shadow effect, one needs to observe addi- tional features of the phenomena or to choose a scheme where one of the effects is excluded. Young’s double-slit experiment (Carnal and Mlynek, 1991; Shimizu et al., 1992), as well as interference produced by a phase grat- ing created using light that is far-detuned from atomic transition frequencies (Rasel et al., 1995), cannot be ex- plained in terms of atoms moving on classical trajecto- ries. A matter-wave interpretation is also necessary if one observes a shift in the fringe pattern resulting from an index change in one of the arms of an interferometer (Ekstrom et al., 1995). We determine below those partic- ular conditions for which pure quantum interference can be obtained using MS. Let us estimate a typical distance for which quantum interference effects have to be included. Consider an in- cident beam which has zero angular divergence. The atoms are assumed to be in a pure state having mo- mentum p=(0,py,0) (see Fig. 2). Localization of the atoms inside each slit leads to an uncertainty in the x- component of atomic momentum δp∼¯h d, where it is as- sumed that the slit width fdis comparable with the MS periodd.A beam passing through the slits acquires an angular divergence δθ∼δp py, and atoms passing through a given slit are deposited on the screen with a spot size δx∼Lδθ∼L¯h dpy.Interference occurs when spots pro- duced by neighboring slits overlap, i. e. when δx∼d. One finds, therefore, that the characteristic distance for 2which matter-wave interference plays an essential role is given by L∼LT, (4) where LT= 2d2/λdB (5) is the so-called Talbot distance and λdB=h pyis the atomic de Broglie wavelength. ~p~dpypy d x~LL~LT=2d2 dBMS Screen p=(0,py) FIG. 2. The incident atomic wave function after scatter- ing from MS transforms into a superposition of the divergent waves emitted from the each slit, having angular divergence δθinverse to the MS’s period d. (for the given duty cycle). One estimates Talbot distance as a distance between MS and screen large enough to provide overlapping of neighboring d i- vergent waves and their interference. The manner in which this distance appears in the the- ory of the optical or atomic Talbot-effect is well known in the context of the Fresnel-Kirchhoff theory of diffrac- tion [see, for example, (Patorski, 1989; Winthrop and Worthington, 1965) for optical Talbot-effect theory and (Chapman et al., 1995; Turchette et al., 1992; Clauser and Reinsch, 1992; Carnal et al., 1995) for atomic Talbot- effect theory]. One can obtain Eq. (4, 5) using another description. When the number of slits in the MS and the area of the incident atomic beam are infinite, construc- tive interference occurs only for those directions in which pis changed by an integral multiple of the recoil mo- mentum ¯hk.In the atomic ”rest-frame” (a frame moving along they−axis with velocity u=py/M, (6) whereMis the atomic mass) an out-going state with mo- mentump+n¯hk(1) acquires a phase φn=ǫp+n¯hkt/¯h, whereǫp=p2 2Mis the kinetic energy associated with atomic motion along the x-axis andtis the time after scattering from the MS. Comparing this phase with the phaseφ0that an atom would acquire in the absence of the MS, one sees that a dephasing δφ=φn−φ0occursfor the different out-going state amplitudes as a result of diffraction. The relative dephasing is δφ=nφD+n2φt, (7) where φD=kvt, (7a) φt=ωkt, (7b) v=p Mis thexcomponent of atomic velocity, and ωk=¯hk2 2M(8) is a recoil frequency, related to the energy that an atom, having initial momentum p= 0,acquires as a result of recoil during scattering. The two contributions to the dephasing (7) have different origins. The phase φDis a Doppler phase that does not disappear in the classical limit ¯h→0; consequently, it must be classical in nature. It is evident from Fig. 1b that, for atoms incident with a nonzero value of p, the shadow moves along the x−axis together with atoms. The nodes in the shadow are dis- placed by a distance ∆ x=vtalong thex−axis, which corresponds to a phase shift of 2 π∆x dfor the atomic grat- ing, a phase shift that coincides with φD.The phaseφD is analogous to the phase a moving dipole driven by an optical field would acquire in its rest frame as a result of the Doppler frequency shift. The phase φtin Eq. (7) is a quantum addition to the dephasing, resulting from recoil. This contribution is responsible for atomic scattering and for matter-wave interference. Quantum effects have to be included when this phase is of order unity, that is, for times of order tT= 2π/ωk. (9) One finds that length associated with this time in labo- ratory frame coincides with the Talbot distance LT=utT. (10) Thus, we are led to the same conclusion that we reached above by considering the scattering from two adjacent slits; forωktT>∼1 orL>∼LT, one must use a quantized description of the atomic center-of-mass motion. In this chapter we consider the Talbot-effect and other interference phenomena as a consequence of the recoil- effect. In the context of the nonlinear interaction of opti- cal fields with an atomic vapor, the recoil effect was con- sidered by Kol’chenko et al. (1968) and observed by Hall et al. (1976). Quantum structure resulting from the scat- tering of atoms by a resonant standing wave (resonant Kapitza-Dirac effect), which can be attributed to atomic recoil, was discussed theoretically by Kazantsev et al. (1980) and observed by Moskovitz et al. (1983). Splitting 3of optical Ramsey fringes (Baklanov et al., 1976) associ- ated with the resonant Kapitza-Dirac effect was discussed theoretically by Dubetsky and Semibalamut (1978) and observed by Barger et al. (1979). Matter-wave interfer- ence resulting from resonant Kapitsa-Dirac scattering in a standing wave field has been studied theoretically by Altschuler and Frantz (1973) ,Dubetsky et al. (1984) and observed by Rasel et al. (1995). The theory of atom interference presented here, based on an interpretation of scattering of atoms by MS in terms of the recoil effect, is a natural extension of the work involving standing-wave fields. This chapter is organized as follows: in the next Sec- tion we discuss conditions necessary for the observation of matter-wave interference in different regimes. Rigor- ous proof of the equivalence of theories based on Fresnel- Kirchhoff integrals and on the recoil effect is given in Sec- tion III, as is a discusion of the atomic gratings that can be produced as a consequence of the Talbot effect. The classical shadow effect is analyzed in Section IV. Section V is devoted to a theory of the Talbot-Lau effect. The Talbot and Talbot-Lau effects for a thermal beam are considered in the Section VI, in the limit where the char- acteristic length scale in the problem is larger than the Talbot length LT. A discussion of the results is given in Section VII. II. QUALITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS The scattering of atoms by gratings can be separated roughly into three categories: classical scattering, Fres - nel diffraction, and Fraunhofer diffraction. The limit of Bragg scattering (Martin et al., 1988), in which ωkℓ′/u≥ 1, whereℓ′is the grating thickness, is not discussed in this chapter. A. Fresnel Diffraction The Fresnel diffraction limit occurs when ωkt∼1 or L∼LT. Owing to the angular divergence of the inci- dent beam, it is possible that the diffraction pattern at L∼LTwill be washed out. To ensure that this does not occur, it is necessary that the spread of Doppler phases, kutTθb=kLTθb,be smaller than unity. This require- ment corresponds to inequality (3) when L∼LT. Using Eq. (5), the condition on θbcan be restated as θb≪θd, (11) where θd=¯hk py=λdB d(12)is the angle associated with a single atomic recoil at the MS (δp= ¯hk). The Talbot effect refers to the self- imaging of a grating in the Fresnel diffraction limit. For self-imaging to occur, the displacement of the scattered atomic beam LTθdmust be much smaller than the beam diameterD,which translates into the condition D≫d. (13) In this limit, one can consider the beam diameter to be infinite to first approximation; finite beam effects (or, equivalently, gratings with finite slit number) are dis- cussed by Clauser and Reinsch (1992) . Conditions (4, 11, 13) are sufficient to observe the Tal- bot effect. In this case, the contribution to the wave function’s phase resulting from atomic recoil is of order unity, the scattered beams overlap almost entirely with one another on the screen, and the atomic gratings are not washed out after averaging over atomic velocities vin the incident beam. Matter-wave interference is a critical component of the Talbot effect. B. Fraunhofer Diffraction Although the Talbot effect illustrates a matter-wave interference phenomenon, it does not result in an atom interferometer having two arms that are nonoverlapping. We refer to the Fraunhofer diffraction limit as one in which the various diffraction orders are nonoverlapping at a distance Lfrom a single grating. The grating then serves as a beam splitter that physically separates the incident beam into two or more beams. To physically separate the various diffraction orders over a distance L, one must require that Lθd≫D. (14) Using the fact that θd=λdB/dand setting t=L u,one can recast this inequality as ωkt≫D/d;L/L T≫D/d, (15) which requires the quantum phase φt(7b) to be larger thanD/d>> 1. Consequently, quantum effects play an essential role in an atom interferometer having nonover- lapping beam paths. Note that the Fraunhofer limit can- not be reached for a beam having infinite diameter. We do not consider matter-wave interference in the Fraun- hofer limit in this work. C. Talbot-Lau Regime. To achieve spatial separation of the beams in the Fraunhofer limit and to observe the Talbot effect, the angular divergence θbof the incident beam must be less thanθd. For typical values d∼200nm,M∼20 4A.u., u ∼105cm/s, the deflection angle θd∼10−4 rad.Atomic beams having θb≪θdhave been used to observe atomic scattering by standing waves (Moskovitz et. al., 1983), to build a two-arm atom interferometer (Keith et al., 1991; Rasel et al., 1995; Giltner et al., 1995), and to observe the Talbot-effect (Chapman et al., 1995). Such strong collimation results in a decrease in the atomic flux and a corresponding decrease in signal strength that may be a limiting factor in certain applica- tions of matter-wave interference, such as atom lithogra- phy (Timp et al., 1992). Alternatively, one can observe matter-wave interference in beams having larger angular divergence using the atomic Talbot-Lau effect [see for ex- ample (Patorski, 1989)]. In the atomic Talbot-Lau effect two or more MS are used. Doppler dephasing following the first MS washes out the normal Talbot effect, but subsequent scattering by a second MS can result in a Doppler rephasing that ultimately leads to a Talbot-like interference pattern. The dephasing-rephasing process is analogous to that occurring in the production of pho- ton echoes (Dubetsky et al., 1984). The atomic Talbot- Lau effect has been observed recently by Clauser and Li (1994) using a K beam scattered by MS. The incident beam is not separated into nonoverlapping beams in the Talbot-Lau effect, but the origin of the interference pat- tern can still be traced to matter-wave interference since it is related to Fresnel diffraction. D. Classical Scattering It is worthwhile at this point to return to the classical shadow effect. The shadow effect in a collimated beam is obvious; the atomic grating produced by the MS simply propagates in space over a distance in which diffraction can be ignored ( L/L T≪1). If one has an ensemble of atoms incident on a MS from different angles, each veloc- ity subgroup creates its own grating. Just after passing through the MS, all the gratings are the same, having the profile of the MS. Downstream from the MS, the atomic gratings corresponding to different velocity classes move in different directions (two of them are shown in Fig.1b). The grating of the ensemble as a whole is washed out at a distance ˜ℓfrom the MS, provided that ˜ℓθb≥d. (16) For Lθb≫d, (17) the shadow of the atomic grating is washed out well be- fore reaching the screen or any subsequent MS in the experimental setup . There are two ways to view the washing out of the grating. As discussed above, the washing out is a result of the different classical trajectories of the atoms. Analternative view allows one to relate this phenomenon to that encountered in optical coherent transients. Imagine that the incident beam consists of a number of velocity subgroups, having vx≡v∼uθb. When the atoms are scattered by a MS having a transmission function χ1(x), the atomic density immediately following the grating is proportional to χ1(x). Downstream from the MS, the atomic grating in the x-direction simply propagates with velocityv, leading to a density distribution that varies asχ1(x−vt), wheret=y/uandyis the distance from the grating. If this density distribution is expanded in a Fourier series, one finds terms in the sum that vary as cos[nk(x−vt)], wherenis an integer. In this picture, particles in velocity subgroup vacquire a Doppler phase (7a) of order φD∼kvt∼θbL/d≫1, (18) as they propagate a distance of order Lfrom the MS . The decay of the macroscopic grating is analogous to the free-induction-decay of the macroscopic polarization of a Doppler-broadened atomic vapor following excitation by an optical pulse. In this approach, one can draw on many processes that are well known in the theory of optical co- herent transients. Although the atomic grating is washed out following the interaction with the MS, it is possible to restore the original macroscopic atomic grating by placing a second MS between the first MS and the screen. This effect has been observed recently by Batelaan et al. (1996) using a metastable Ar beam. In the classical trajectory picture, the restoration of the grating corresponds to a Moir´ e pat- tern. In the Doppler dephasing picture, the restoration is analogous to the dephasing-rephasing process that oc- curs for a photon echo. The first MS starts a dephasing process for the different velocity subgroups and the sec- ond MS results in a rephasing process (see below, section IV. A). At a particular focal plane, where the rephasing is complete, a macroscopic grating appears. For L≪LT (19) effects relating to quantization of the atomic center-of- mass motion play no role [1]. IfL∼LT, one has to include recoil effects. Gratings appearing in this regime are usually associated with the Talbot-Lau effect, i. e. with the interference of light for the optical case or quantum interference of matter waves in the case of the atomic Talbot-Lau effect. It is shown in Sec. V, however, that the position of the focal planes and gratings’ periods are often the same as in the classi- cal case. From this point of view, the Talbot-Lau effect is a quantum generalization of the shadow effect. In summary, one can conclude that interference is qualitatively different for collimated beams and beams with large angular divergence. For collimated beams (θbL≪d) one has two interesting regimes, 5L∼LT [ωkt∼1] (20) and L/L T≫D/d [ωkt≫D/d], (20a) corresponding to Fresnel (Talbot effect) and Fraunhofer diffraction (nonoverlapping scattered beams), respec- tively. For beams having angular divergence θbL≫d, the Fresnel and Fraunhofer diffraction patterns would wash out following a single MS. Restoration of the atomic gratings in this limit can be achieved using two or more MS. Distances L∼LTcorrespond to the atomic Talbot- Lau effect and distances L≪LTωkt≪1 (21) correspond to the classical shadow effect. III. TALBOT EFFECT A. Talbot effect as a recoil effect. In this section we show that the Talbot effect is a con- sequence of the recoil an atom undergoes when it passes through a microfabricated structure (MS). We assume that the MS is located in the plane y= 0,normal to the direction of propagation of the atomic beam. The MS consists of an infinite number of slits oriented in thez−direction; as such, only the x−dependence of the atomic wave function changes when atoms pass through the slits. Atomic motion in the y−direction can be con- sidered as classical in nature provided that λdB/d≪1, but motion along the x-axis must be quantized. In this section, it is assumed that the incident beam is strongly collimated, θb≪d/L, wheredis the period of the MS andLis the distance from the MS to the screen. As such, we can neglect any spread in the transverse velocities in the initial beam and consider all atoms to be incident with transverse momentum p= 0. After passing through the MS, the wave function for an atom is given by ψ(x) =η(x), (22) whereη(x) is the amplitude transmission function asso- ciated with the MS .In the momentum representation, ψ(x) can be written as a superposition of states having momentap=m¯hk,wheremis an integer and k= 2π/d. Explicitly, one finds that the Fourier transform of ψ(x) is given by ˜ψ(p) =√ 2π¯h/summationdisplay mηmδ(p−m¯hk), (23) whereηm=/integraldisplaydx de−imkxη(x) (24) is a Fourier coefficient. Unless indicated otherwise, all sums run from −∞to +∞. The terms with m∝ne}ationslash= 0 in Eq. (23) can be associated with atomic scattering at an- glesm¯hk/p y, wherepyis the longitudinal momentum in the atomic beam. It is assumed that pyis constant for all atoms in the beam - this restriction is relaxed in Sec. VI. In analogy with electron scattering from a standing wave field [Kapitza-Dirac effect (Kapitza and Dirac, 1933)] or atomic scattering from a resonant standing wave field [resonant Kapitza-Dirac effect (Kazantsev et al., 1980)], the scattering from the MS can be interpreted as aris- ing from the recoil the atoms undergo when they acquire m¯hkof momenta by scattering from the MS. The classical motion of the atoms in the y-direction associates a distance ywith a time t=y/u, (25) whereu=py/MandMis the atomic mass. For a given u, the momentum space wave function evolves as ˜ψ(p,t) =e−iǫpt/¯h˜ψ(p) =√ 2π¯h/summationdisplay mηmexp[−im2ωkt]δ(p−m¯hk),(26) whereǫp=p2/2Mis the kinetic energy of an atom hav- ing center of mass momentum p, andωk= ¯hk2/2Mis a recoil frequency. In the coordinate representation ψ(x,t) =/integraldisplay∞ −∞dp√ 2π¯heipx/¯h˜ψ(p,t) (27) one finds ψ(x,t) =/summationdisplay mηmexp[imkx−im2φt], (28) where the Talbot phase is defined by φt=ωkt. (29) Superposition of the different terms in Eq. (28) leads to a spatial modulation of the atomic density f(x,t) =|ψ(x,t)|2. (30) The interference terms in Eq. (30) are a direct mani- festation of matter-wave interference. One can see that, as a function of the time of flight t=y/u,the wave function (28) undergoes oscillations on a time scale ω−1 k. As a consequence, the atomic spatial distribution (30) contains quantum beats at frequencies ( m2−n2)ωk, for integralm,n. Such quantum beats have been predicted by Chebotayev et al. (1985) and observed by Chapman et al. (1995). 6It follows from Eq.(28) that the atomic wave function coincides with the amplitude transmission function of the MS when t=tT≡2π/ωk. (31) At this time, atoms are found in the focal plane at y=LT=utT= 2d2/λdB, (32) and a self-image of the MS is produced. In general one finds that the atomic wave function is a periodic function of the Talbot phase φthaving period 2 π,a periodic func- tion of the time thaving period 2 π/ωk,and a periodic function of the distance yhaving period LT. The self-imaging of a periodic structure is well known in classical optics as the Talbot effect. To describe this effect, one usually starts from the Fresnel-Kirchhoff equa- tion ψ(x) =1√iλdBy/integraldisplay∞ −∞dx′η(x′)exp/bracketleftbig ikdB(x−x′)2/2y/bracketrightbig , (33) which is written here in the parabolic approximation. To establish an equivalence between Eqs.(33) and (28), one can substitute the Fourier expansion of the function η(x′) in Eq.(33), carry out the integration, and express yin terms oft. It is possible to derive a useful symmetry property for f(x,t) when the transmission function η(x) is real, as it is for the MS. For real η(x), there is pure amplitude mod- ulation of the atomic wave function and ηm=η∗ −m.It then follows from Eqs. (28) and (30) that the atomic spa- tial distribution is invariant under inversion with respec t to the plane y=LT/2,i. e. f(x,t)|φt=f(x,t)|2π−φt(34) f(x,t) =f(x,tT−t) (34a) f(x,t)|y=f(x,t)|LT−y. (34b) Thus, one need calculate f(x,t) in the range 0 ≤y≤ LT/2 to obtain the distribution for all y. B. Calculation of the atomic density profile We have seen that, for a sufficiently collimated atomic beam, self-imaging of a MS occurs at integral multiples of the Talbot length. To analyze the diffraction pattern for arbitrary y, it is convenient to use Eqs. (24) and (28) to reexpress the atomic wave-function as the convolution (Winthrop and Worthington, 1965)ψ(x,φt) = (1/d)/integraldisplayx x−dη(x′)Z(x−x′,φt)dx′,(35) where Z(x,φt) =/summationdisplay mexp/bracketleftbig −im2φt+imkx/bracketrightbig . (36) In the following discussion, we calculate ψ(x,φt= 2πy/L T) at fractions of the Talbot length, that is, for y=LT/n, (37) or, equivalently, for φt= 2π/n, (38) wherenis a positive integer. Whenn= 2, one can show that the diffraction pattern is a self-image of the MS, shifted by half a period. For n= 2,φt=π,and Z(x,π) =/parenleftbig 1−eikx/parenrightbig/summationdisplay qe2iqkx. (39) Using the equality /summationdisplay qeiqα≡2π/summationdisplay sδ(α−2πs), (40) one finds Z(x,π) =d/summationdisplay odd sδ/parenleftbigg x−sd 2/parenrightbigg . (41) For the integration range in Eq. (35), only the s= 1 term contributes when Eq. (41) is substituted into Eq. (35), leading to ψ(x,π) =η/parenleftbigg x−d 2/parenrightbigg , (42) i. e. at half-integral multiples of the Talbot length, there are self images of the MS shifted by half a period. For arbitrary n, it is convenient to write m=nq+r, (43) where 0 ≤r≤n−1 andqandrare integers. It then follows that exp/parenleftbig −im2φt/parenrightbig = exp( −2πim2/n)≡exp/parenleftbig −i2πr2/n/parenrightbig . (44) and Z(x,2π/n) =d/summationdisplay sasδ/parenleftbigg x−sd n/parenrightbigg , (45) where 7as(n) =1 nn−1/summationdisplay r=0exp[2πir(s−r)/n]. (45a) The atomic wave function (35) is then given by ψ(x,2π/n) =n−1/summationdisplay s=0as(n)η/parenleftbigg x−sd n/parenrightbigg . (46) The meaning of this equation is clear. At distances y=LT/n, the wave function consists of nself-images of the amplitude transmission function η(x), having differ- ent amplitudes as(n) (some of which might vanish) and spaced from one another by the distance d/n. For ap- propriately chosen η(x) andn(see below), the atomic density (30) associated with the wave-function (46) is a periodic function of xhaving period dg=d/n,ordg= 2d/n. (47) Thus, the Talbot-effect can be used to generate spatial modulation of an atomic beam having a period which is a fraction of the period of the MS. We refer to such profiles as ”higher order atomic gratings.”To simplify the expression for the coefficients as(n), one can use an alternative approach for evaluating Z(x,φt) (Winthrop and Worthington, 1965). The sum in Eq. (36) can be written in the form Z(x,φt) =1 2π/summationdisplay q/integraldisplay dmdf ×exp/bracketleftbig −if(q−m)−im2φt+imkx/bracketrightbig .(48) Carrying out the integration over m,summation over q [using Eq. (40)] and integration over f,one arrives at Z(x,φt) =/radicalbiggπ iφt/summationdisplay rzr(x,φt), (49) where zr(x,φt) = exp/bracketleftBig i(kx+ 2πr)2/4φt/bracketrightBig . (49a) At distances y=LT/none finds zr(x,2π/n) = exp/bracketleftBig in(kx)2/8π/bracketrightBig/braceleftbigg exp/bracketleftbig inkx/parenleftbig q+1 2/parenrightbig +inπ 2/bracketrightbig ,forr= 2q+ 1, exp (inkxq ), forr= 2q,(50) whereqis integer. Substituting this expression into Eq. (49) and summing over r, one arrives again at Eq. (45), but with an alternative expression for as(n): as(n) =1√ 2in/bracketleftBig 1 + (−1)seinπ/2/bracketrightBig eiπs2/2n. (51) C. Higher-order gratings using the Talbot effect One can conclude from Eq. (46) that, owing to matter- wave interference, the transmission function η(x) im- printed on the atomic wave function by the MS can be copiedntimes in the plane y=LT/n,with each copy separated by d/n. This effect occurs for arbitrary trans- mission functions and can be used to generate higher or- der atomic gratings. Since theas(n) appearing in Eq. (46) are not necessar- ily equal, the wave function (46) is periodic with period d, but not necessarily with period dg<d.Moreover, it is possible for the different copies corresponding to differ- entsto overlap. We refer to a pure, higher order atomic grating as one in which the different grating images do not overlap and for which dg<d. When the width fdof the slits in the MS is smaller than spacing d/n,different terms in the wave-function (46) do not overlap with one another and one finds for the atomic density (30)f(x,t) =m−1/summationdisplay s=0|as(n)|2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleη/parenleftbigg x−sd n/parenrightbigg/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 . (52) Pure higher order atomic gratings are produced only if the nonvanishing |as(n)|are equal. From Eq. (51) one sees that |as(n)|=/radicalbigg 2 n/braceleftbigg |cos(nπ/4)|,for evens |sin (nπ/4)|,for odds.(53) Three different situations can be distinguished 1.n= 2m+ 1 2.n= 2(2m+ 1) 3.n= 4m(54) for integers m≥0. In the first case |as(n)|=1√n, independent of s. At distancesy=LT/3, y=LT/5, ..., pure, higher order atomic gratings having periods dg=d/3, d/5...are produced. In the second case |as(n)|= 0 forseven and |as(n)|=/radicalBig 2 n, independent of s, forsodd. In the plane y=LT/2 the atomic grating is shifted by a half-period d/2 from the initial grating (as found above); in the plane y=LT/6 only terms located at x=d 6,d 2,5d 6in Eq. (52) con- tribute to the sum (for 0 ≤x<d), corresponding to an atomic grating having period dg=d/3,that is shifted by a distance d/6 from the initial grating .In general in the focal plane y=LT/[2 (2m+ 1)],one finds an atomic 8grating having period dg=d/(2m+ 1) which is shifted by a distance d/[2 (2m+ 1)] from the initial grating . 0 10.48 0 10.35y=LT/16 y=LT/15 0 10.46y=LT/140 11/6y=LT/12 0 10.36y=LT/11 0 11/5y=LT/10 0 10.44y=LT/90 11/4y=LT/8 0 10.57y=LT/7 0 11/3y=LT/6 0 11/5y=LT/50 11/2y=LT/4 0 11/3y=LT/3 0 11y=LT/2 0 11y=LT 0 10.33y=LT/13 x/dAtomic density distribution f(x,t=y/u) FIG. 3. One period of the atomic density spatial modula- tion in the planes located at the distances y=LT/m(m= 1, . . .16). The case of the atomic beam modulation with micro- fabricated structure having transmission step-function ( 56) with relative width f= 0.16 is shown .While expected period dgof the beam self-image greater than slits’ width σ=d f, one obtains higher-order spatial gratings. In the third case |as(n)|=/radicalBig 2 n, independent of s, forseven and |as(n)|= 0 forsodd. In the planes y=LT/4, y=LT/8..., one finds atomic gratings hav- ing periods dg=d/2, d/4.... The atomic density profile can no longer be written in the form (52) when fd>d g. (55) In this limit, different components in the wave-function (46) overlap and can interfere with one another in form- ing the atomic density. Even though the atomic distribu- tion function can still contain narrow peaks having a size of order ofdg,the amplitudes of the peaks are not equal, and the period of the overall diffraction pattern reverts to the period dof the initial grating. These different regimes are illustrated in Fig. 3 plot- ted for an amplitude transmission function defined in the interval 0 ≤x<d as η(x) =/braceleftbigg 1,for 0≤x≤df 0,fordf <x<d. (56) The Talbot effect enables one to create pure, higher-order atomic gratings having periods that are limited only by the slit widths in the MS.IV. SHADOW EFFECT WITH MICROFABRICATED STRUCTURES In the previous section, it was assumed that the an- gular divergence θbof the incident beam was less than d/LT. If this inequality is not satisfied, the diffraction patterns associated with different velocity subgroups in the incident atomic beam result in a washing out of the overall diffraction pattern. For typical beam parameters, this condition restricts θbto be less than 10−5−10−4rad. The restriction on θbis a limiting factor on the maxi- mum flux of the atomic beam. It is possible to avoid this restriction and increase the atomic flux if echo-like techniques are used. Using echo techniques that are analogous to those en- countered in the study of coherent transients, one can observe matter-wave interference in beams having a large angular divergence (Dubetsky et al., 1984). It turns out, however, that the dephasing and rephasing of the atomic gratings which occurs in such schemes does not depend in any critical manner on quantization of the atomic center- of-mass motion. In other words, the dephasing-rephasing mechanism is the same whether or not L∼LT(Talbot effect) orL≪LT(classical limit). As such, it makes sense to consider the limit of classical scattering first, since the analysis is easier and a simple geometric in- terpretation can be given to the results (Dubetsky and Berman, 1994). Thus, we consider the limit L≪LTin this section and defer a discussion of the case L∼LT until Sec. V. In this and the following section we consider the inter- action of an atomic beam with two MS, separated by a distanceL. The angular divergence of the incident beam is sufficiently large to satisfy the inequality θb≫d/L. (57) The first MS produces a sum of atomic gratings, one for each velocity subgroup in the initial atomic beam. Imme- diately following the MS, these gratings overlap and mir- ror the transmission function of the grating, but down- stream from the MS, they dephase relative to one an- other. As a result, the macroscopic atomic grating is washed out at a distance ˜ℓ∼d/θb≪L (58) from the MS. Although the macroscopic grating produced by the first MS washes out in a distance of order ˜ℓ≪L, it is possible for the second MS to lead to a restoration of the atomic gratings. For particles moving on classical trajectories, we refer to this process as a shadow effect since it can be interpreted completely by the ”shadow” of the incident beam formed by the two MS (Chebotayev et al., 1985) (see Fig. 4). 9Microfabricated structuresAtomic gratings 2L5L46L54L33L25L3 Gratings' periodsdd 3d 2d 3d 4d 5Atomic beam L ~dx yg FIG. 4. Shadow effect, geometric simulation. Atomic beam having large angular divergence ( θb= 120◦) passes through two separated MSs having the same periods d1=d2=d, duty cycles f1= 0.5 and f2= 0.05 and separated on the distance L.Grating carved by first MS is washed out on the distance ℓ∼d.Other gratings between MSs (0 < y < L ) are fictive, they appeared because only trajectories for atoms passed through both MSs are shown. Gratings after the second MS ( y > L ) are real, they appear owing to echo effect. For a beam having large angular divergence ( θb∼1), the initial grating produced by the first MS washes out in a distance comparable with the MS’s period, in accor- dance with Eq. (58). After passing through the second MS, however, macroscopic gratings reappear in specific focal planes. A grating having the same period as the MS is focused in the focal plane y= 2L, while higher-order gratings having periods d/n(for integer n) are focused at other locations (to be determined below). The shadow effect can also be demonstrated easily using incoherent light (Chebotayev, 1986). Although the shadow effect occurs for classical parti- cles, it can be interpreted in terms of a dephasing and rephasing of atomic gratings. The relevant phases are the Doppler phases associated with various Fourier com- ponents of the atomic density, as discussed in the In- troduction. In such a picture, the final image on the screen depends on a cancellation of Doppler phases in the spatial regions 0 →LandL→2L, for example. In other words, the signal is sensitive to the relative Doppler phases in two spatial regions and is a measure of this relative phase. Insofar as interferometers are measures of relative phase, the echo-like rephasing of the atomic gratings can be viewed as a manifestation of atom in- terferometry. On the other hand, this rephasing is not related to the wave nature of matter. A shadow effectinterferometer of this type was used by Batelaan et al. (1996) to measure the displacement of atomic gratings produced by rotation and by gravity. The same type of Doppler dephasing and rephasing that occurs using MS can also occur when atoms in- teract with two or more nearly resonant standing wave fields (Baklanov et al., 1976; Barger et. al., 1979; Dubet- sky, 1976; Chebotayev, 1978; Chebotayev et al., 1978a, LeGou¨ et and Berman, 1979; Mossberg et al., 1979; Du- betsky and Semibalamut, 1982; Bord´ e, 1989; Dubetsky and Berman, 1994). When standing wave optical fields are used for modulation of the atomic spatial distribu- tion, the atomic gratings often are monitored by applying a probe pulse in the focal planes that transfers the phase associated with an atomic state population to one asso- ciated with an atomic coherence. Atom interferometers of this type have been used for precision measurements of gravitational (Kasevich and Chu, 1991) and inertial (Riehle et al., 1991) phenomena [for a review, see (M¨ uller et al., 1995)]. In these cases, external fields give rise to a displacement of the atomic gratings. A. Dephasing-rephasing processes using two spatially separated MS Before calculating the particles’ distribution function, we derive some general properties of grating formation. In this subsection, it is convenient to make a Fourier decomposition of the atomic density profile in the x- direction. The propagation of each of the Fourier com- ponents is then treated separately. Consider the case when the two MS (1 and 2) have periodsd1andd2and are separated from one another by a distance L.A MS forms a periodic spatial distribu- tion (shadow) which is the same for all atomic velocity subgroups just after passing through the MS. The profile created by the first MS contains a sum of harmonics in thex−direction having spatial periods dm1=d/|m1|, (59) wherem1is an integer. Immediately following the MS, them1th spatial harmonic varies as cos(m1k1x), where k1= 2π/d1is the wave-number associated with the first MS. As the atoms move downstream from the first MS, them1th harmonic acquires a Doppler phase (7a) given by φm1(t) =m1k1vt, (60) wherevis the x-component of atomic velocity and t= y/uas before. For a time td∼1/(k1v) (61) the Doppler phases becomes large, φm1(t)>∼1,and the macroscopic grating washes out on averaging over 10v.Sincev∼uθb,the timetd(61) corresponds to the distance ˜ℓ(58). The atoms pass through the second MS at time T= L/u(y=L). Downstream from the second MS, each spa- tial harmonic acquires an additional phase (i.e., a phase in addition to φm1(t), which, itself, continues to increase following the second MS) φm2(t) =m2k2v(t−T), (62) wherem2is another integer. Since the mask created by the second MS is superimposed on the shadow from the first MS, the resulting shadow consists of harmonics hav- ing wave numbers kh=|m1k1+m2k2| (63) and velocity-dependent Doppler phases φ(t) =φm1(t) +φm2(t). (64) The two phases in the rhs of this equation can cancel one another at the so-called echo time tedefined by φ(te) = 0, (65) corresponding to a focal plane ye=ute. At such times, one produces an harmonic in the atomic density that is independent of v; as a consequence this grating survives any averaging over the velocity distribution in the inci- dent beam. From Eq. (65) one sees gratings are focused when te/T=ye/L=1. 1 + (m1/m2)(k1/k2)(66) The dephasing-rephasing process is illustrated in Fig. 5.j(m-n)k1vtjk 1v(mT-nt) t(t) 0 TmTn FIG. 5. A dephasing-rephasing process responsible for the atomic grating focusing at the focal plane y=m nLproduced by two MSs having periods d1andd2and associated wave numbers k1andk2, such as jk1=ℓk2,where jandℓare inte- grals. When atomic beam passes through first MS a number of harmonics having wave numbers m1k1(harmonics m1k1) are induced. Mask, consisting of harmonics m2k2,is superim- posed on the atomic spatial profile when beam passes through second MS. Dephasing of the relevant harmonic j(m−n)k1 occurs between MSs. Second MS starts rephasing process for harmonic j(m−n)k1−ℓmk2=−jnk1which leads to the phase cancellation at the echo-point t=m nT,where macro- scopic atomic grating is focused. Other harmonics contribu t- ing to this grating must have wave numbers q-times larger, where qis integral. Their phase diagrams differ from plotted only by scaling the phase in q−times. [To satisfy Eq. (65), the integers m1andm2must have opposite signs (for the sake of illustration, we take m1as negative in the examples given below)]. We assume that the ratio of the MS’s periods is ratio- nal, d1/d2=k2/k1=j/ℓ, (67) wherejandℓare the smallest positive integers which can be used to satisfy this equation. In this case an infinite number of harmonics associated with pairs ( m1,m2), having the same ratiom1 m2,contribute at a given focal plane. It follows from Eqs. (66, 67) that for m1 m2=−(j/ℓ)/parenleftBig 1−n m/parenrightBig , (68) wheremandnare positive integers having no common factors with m>n, gratings in the atomic spatial distri- bution appear at echo times te=m nT (69) or at focal planes located at 11ye=m nL. (70) From Eq. (63), one finds that harmonics having kh=|m1|k1 m n−1(71) are focused in this plane. For example, consider the limiting case in which d1= d2≡d(j=ℓ= 1), analogous to the situation stud- ied by Dubetsky and Berman (1994). In the plane y= 2L(m/n= 2), all harmonics having m2/m1=−2 (i.e.{m1,m2}={−1,2};{−2,4};{−3,6};etc) are fo- cused. As a result [see Eq. (63)], harmonics having kh=k,2k,3k,etc, are focused in the plane y= 2L. The period of this atomic grating dgcorresponds to the smallest value of kh,namelydg= 2π/k=d. Similarly, in the plane y= 3L/2 (m/n = 3/2), all harmonics having m2/m1=−3 (i.e. {m1,m2}= {−1,3};{−2,6};{−3,9};etc)are focused. As a result [see Eq. (63)], harmonics having kh= 2k,4k,6k,etc, are fo- cused in the plane y= (3/2)L. The period of this atomic grating isdg= 2π/2k=d/2. Form= (n+ 1), one finds that atomic gratings having period dg=d/nare focused in the plane y= [(n+ 1)/n]L. To treat the case of arbitrary, rational d1/d2=j/ℓ, we set m1=−¯j(m−n)q, m 2=¯ℓmq, (72) whereqis an integer, ¯j=j/µ, ¯ℓ=ℓ/µ, (73) andµis the largest common factor of j(m−n) andℓm. Harmonics having wave numbers (71) kh=n¯jk1|q|, (74) are focused in the plane ye=m nL. The minimum possible wave number kg=n¯jk1 (75) determines the period of the focused grating dg=2π kg=d1 ¯jn. (76) One concludes that it is possible to create a higher order atomic grating, having a period that is ¯jn−times smaller than that of the first MS, by passing an atomic beam having a large angular divergence through two MS. Although both the Talbot and shadow effects lead to higher order atomic gratings, there is a qualitative difference between the two cases. In the Talbot effect, the structure of the MS is copied ntimes in the image planey=LT/n, giving rise to a profile having perioddg=d1/nor 2d1/n,provided that dg>f1d1. The mini- mum period is determined by the slit width. In contrast, the period of the atomic grating produced by the shadow effect in the plane ye=m nLis given by Eq. (76) and is not limited by the slit widths of the MS (although the contrast is determined by the slit widths). The pe- riod of the atomic grating is equal to d1/¯jin the focal planeye= 2Land is compressed by a factor nin the planeye=m nL. This compression lies at the heart of the shadow effect’s application to atomic lithography (Du- betsky and Berman, 1994). Atomic gratings having peri- ods smaller than those of both the MS and even smaller than the slit widths of the MS can be obtained. In this respect the shadow effect has yet an additional advan- tage over the Talbot-effect, where higher order grating production is not accompanied by compression. Before proceeding to calculate the atomic density dis- tribution, we should like to estimate the depth of focus of the various gratings. The distances between focal planes are comparable with the distance Lbetween the MS .One can estimate the depth of focus ˜ℓgfrom the requirement that the phase (64) be smaller than unity in the region of the focal plane. For migiven by (72) one finds φ(t) =qkgvδy/u, (77) whereδy= (y−m nL) = (y−ye) in the neighborhood of the focal plane at y=m nL.Settingq= 1, φ(t)∼1 and δy=˜ℓg, and using Eq. (75) and the fact that θb∼v/u, one obtains ˜ℓg∼˜ℓ n¯j≤˜ℓ, (78) where ˜ℓis given by (58) with d=d1. SinceL≫˜ℓhas been assumed, it is possible to separate the various grat- ings. The sharpening of depth of focus of the higher order gratings predicted by Eq. (78) is in qualitative agreement with the results shown in Fig. 4. B. Particles’ distribution profile We now turn our attention to a calculation of the atomic density profile. In contrast to the Talbot effect, it is not possible to find self-imaging using the shadow effect, since the scattering coefficients for the different spatial harmonics are not the same. Let the transmission functions for the two MS be denoted by χs(x) (s= 1 or 2) [χs(x) is a transmission function for atomic density, whileηs(x) is a transmission function for atomic state amplitudes - for MS having transmission of either 1 or 0, these functions are identical]. Atoms are scattered by the MS in the planes y= 0 andy=L, or, equivalently, at timesT1= 0 andT2=T=L/u. Calculations are carried out using t=y/uas a variable. In some sense, 12this corresponds to working in the atomic rest frame. As a result of scattering, the atomic density is modified as f(x,v,T+ s) =χs(x)f(x,v,T− s), (79) whereT± sare times just after or before a scattering event. Following the scattering event, the distribution evolves a s f(x,v,t) =f[x−v(t−Ts),v,T+ s]. (80) We assume that, for t <0,the atoms are distributed homogeneously in the transverse direction, i.e. f(x,v,t)|t<0= 1. (81) The assumption of a homogeneous velocity distribution is consistent with a beam having angular divergence (57), since in this limit, the transverse velocity distribution i s approximately constant over the range ds/L. The spatial distribution of the atomic density for t>T is given by f(x,t) =∝an}bracketle{tχ1(x−vt)χ2[x−v(t−T)]∝an}bracketri}ht, (82) where ∝an}bracketle{t...∝an}bracketri}htrepresents an average over velocities. Ex- pandingχs(x) in a Fourier series χs(x) =/summationdisplay mχ(s) meimk sx, (83) whereks= 2π/dsis the ”wave-number” of structure s, one finds f(x,t) =/summationdisplay m1, m2χ(1) m1χ(2) m2exp[i(k1m1+k2m2)x]∝an}bracketle{texp [−iφ(t)]∝an}bracketri}ht, (84)whereφ(t), as defined by Eq. (64), is also a function ofmandn. Owing to condition (57), for t∼T∼L/u andv∼uθb, the phase factor in the brackets of Eq. (84) is large, of order Lθb/ds≫1.On averaging over veloc- ities, one finds a nonvanishing contribution only at the particular focal planes or echo-times given by Eq. (65). Retaining contributions from only those migiven by (72) corresponding to the various focal planes, one finds from Eq. (84) that the atomic density in the focal planes is given by f(x,te) =/summationdisplay qχ(1) ¯j(n−m)qχ(2) ¯ℓmqexp(iqkgx), (85) wherekgis the wave number of the focused atomic grat- ing given in Eq. (75) .Thus, owing to the shadow effect, at the echo-time (69) an atomic grating is focused having period dg= 2π/kg=d1/(¯jn). (86) Note that the period of this grating is n¯jtimes smaller than the period of the first microfabricated structure. To reexpress the density function at the focal planes in terms of the transmission functions, we write the Fourier harmonic amplitude χ(j) sas χ(j) s=/integraldisplaydj odx djχj(x)exp(−ikjsx), (87) from which one finds the atomic density at the focal planes given by f(x,te) =/integraldisplayd1 0/integraldisplayd2 0dx1dx2 d1d2/summationdisplay qexp/braceleftbig iq/bracketleftbig kgx+¯j(m−n)k1x1−m¯ℓk2x2/bracketrightbig/bracerightbig χ1(x1)χ2(x2). (88) The sum over qleads to an infinite set of δ−functions /summationdisplay qeiqα= 2π/summationdisplay s′δ(α−2πs′) (89) which allows one to carry out the integration over x1, for example. Only the values x1=d1 ¯j(m−n)/bracketleftbigg s′+m¯ℓx2 d2−x dg/bracketrightbigg (90) in the range [0 ,d1) contribute, resulting in the inequality x dg−m¯ℓx2 d2≤s′<x dg−m¯ℓx2 d2+¯j(m−n) (91) for integers′.One finds that a finite number of terms contribute, having s′=s−/bracketleftbigg m¯ℓx2 d2−x dg/bracketrightbigg I, (92) wheres= 0,1, ...¯j(m−n)−1. In Eq. (92) and for the remainder of this chapter, a notatio n is adopted, in which we setA= [A]I+{A}F,where [A]Iand{A}Fare the integral and fractional parts of A, respectively. Using Eqs. (90) and (92), we obtain 13f(x,te) =1 ¯j(m−n)¯j(m−n)−1/summationdisplay s=0/integraldisplayd2 0dx2 d2χ2(x2)χ1/bracketleftbiggd1 ¯j(m−n)/parenleftbigg s+/braceleftbigg m¯ℓx2 d2−x dg/bracerightbigg F/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg . (93) Consider in detail the case when the microfabricated struct ures have duty cycles (ratio of slit openings to periods) fjand χj(x) =  1,for/braceleftBig x dj/bracerightBig F<fj 0,for/braceleftBig x dj/bracerightBig F>fj. (94) Introducing dimensionless variables w=x/dg, z=x2/(d2f2) (95) and taking into account that the argument of function χ1in Eq. (93) is positive, one obtains f(x,te) =f2 ¯j(m−n)[β]I/summationdisplay s=0hs(w), (96) where hs(w) =/integraldisplay1 0dzθ[β−(s+{αz−w}F)], (96a) α=m¯ℓf2, β=¯j(m−n)f1, (96b) andθ(x) =/braceleftbigg1, for x> 0 0, for x< 0is the Heaviside step function. It is sufficient to consider on ly the range 0≤w≤1. (97) For 0≤s≤[β]I−1, the integrand in Eq. (96a) is equal to unity. Therefore, f(x,te) =f2 ¯j(m−n)/bracketleftbig [β]I+h[β]I(w)/bracketrightbig , (98) and one needs to evaluate the expression (96a) only for s= [β]I, h[β]I(w) =/integraldisplay1 0dzθ({β}F− {αz−w}F). (99) The first term in the Eq. (98) brackets is independent of w=x dg; consequently, it is only the second term which corresponds to the atomic gratings. A method for evaluating the integral (99) is given in the Appe ndix. Using this method one finds h[β]I(w) = [{β}F[α]I+S(w)]/α, (100) where the function S(w) is given by S(w) =  {α}F−w, for 0≤w≤1− {β}F {β}F+{α}F−1,for 1− {β}F≤w≤ {α}F {β}F+w−1,for{α}F≤w≤1 +{α}F− {β}F {α}F, for 1 + {α}F− {β}F≤w≤1  ,if{β}F≥max ({α}F,1− {α}F),(101) S(w) =  {α}F−w, for 0≤w≤ {α}F 0, for{α}F≤w≤1− {β}F {β}F+w−1,for 1− {β}F≤w≤1 +{α}F− {β}F {α}F, for 1 + {α}F− {β}F≤w≤1  ,if{a}F≤ {β}F≤1− {a}F, (101a) 14S(w) =  {β}F, for 0≤w≤ {α}F− {β}F {α}F−w, for{α}F− {β}F≤w≤1− {β}F {β}F+{α}F−1,for 1− {β}F≤w≤ {α}F {β}F+w−1,for{α}F≤w≤1  ,if 1− {a}F≤ {β}F≤ {a}F, (101b) S(w) =  {β}F, for 0≤w≤ {α}F− {β}F {α}F−w, for{α}F− {β}F≤w≤ {α}F 0, for{α}F≤w≤1− {β}F {β}F+w−1,for 1− {β}F≤w≤1  ,if{β}F≤min ({α}F,1− {α}F). (101c) Substituting Eq. (100) in the rhs of Eq. (98) one finds that the atomic beam profile at a given focal plane is equal to f(x,te) = [α[β]I+{β}F[α]I +S(w=x/dg)]//bracketleftbig m(m−n)¯ℓ¯j/bracketrightbig .(102) C. Main features All dependencies in (101) coincide if {α}F={β}F=1/2, (103) when S(w) =/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsinglew−1 2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle. (104) In this case the grating amplitude A=f(x,te)max−f(x,te)min, (105) for givenm,ℓ,j,n, achieves a maximum value A= (2m¯ℓ¯j(m−n))−1. To maximize this quantity for a given grating period, one has to choose ℓ=j= 1 andm=n+1 (¯ℓ=¯j= 1), which corresponds to the focal planes y= 2L(n= 1),y=3/2L(n= 2),y=4/3L(n= 3)..., where gratings having periods dg=d1/nare focused. To satisfy condition (103), one can choose f1= 1/2, f2= 1/[2(n+ 1)], (106) for which A= 1/[2(n+ 1)]. (107) The constant background term of f(x,te) [first two terms in the numerator of Eq. (102)] vanishes since α=β=1/2. (108)00.25 x=0x=d1 ye=6/5L00.25 x=0x=d1 ye=5/4L00.25 x=0x=d1 ye=4/3L00.25 x=0x=d1 ye=3/2L00.25 x=0x=d1 ye=2LAtomic density distribution f(x,te=ye/u) x FIG. 6. Gratings’ profiles produced by two MSs having equal periods ( d1=d2) and duty cycles f1=1 2, f2=5 12 at the different focal planes. Chosen case is optimum for 5−order grating focused at the plane ye=6 5L.This grat- ing has amplitude A=1 12and twice large background term. The amplitude of this grating is not less than amplitudes of the lower-order gratings focused at the other planes for giv en duty cycles. To achieve this maximum signal, one must use slits in the second microfabricated structure whose width is smaller than the atomic grating period ( f2d2=d1/2(n+ 1)≤dg=d1/n). Using the shadow-effect technique, one can also observe atomic gratings having the same ampli- tude (107) whose period is smaller than the slit width, but some background term appears for these gratings. Indeed, iff2=2q+1 2(n+1),ℓ=j= 1,m=n+ 1 (leading to {α}F= 1/2, β= 1/2),for positive integers q≤n, then Eq. (103) still holds and provides the grating amplitude (107), but the background term is qtimes larger than the grating amplitude. For illustration we plot in Fig. 6 the grating pro- files at different focal planes ye=n+1 nL(n= 1,...5) for MS having the same periods d1=d2, and duty cy- clesf1=1 2, f2=5 12,such that the parameters αand 15βare given by α=5 12(n+ 1), β=1 2.This case corre- sponds to the 5 thorder grating at the plane ye=6 5L having maximum amplitude. When the amplitude of the 5thorder grating is optimized and f2≃0.5,the am- plitudes of the gratings that are focused in the planes ye=n+1 nL(n= 1,...4) are less than or equal to the amplitude of the 5 thorder grating. This feature is seen in Fig. 6. The geometric simulation introduced above allows one to obtain the positions of the atomic gratings. It can also be used to provide some quantitative results. For example, one finds from Eqs. (101, 102) that the shadow effect disappears at the focal plane y= 2Lif both MS have the same period ( d1=d2=d) and duty cycles, f1=f2= 0.5.In this case, m= 2, n=j=ℓ= 1, and, from Eq. (96b), one finds that α= 1, β= 0.5. From Eq. (101a) one finds that S(w)≡0; there is no atomic grating. The reason for the absence of the grating under these conditions is evident from Fig. 7. 0.5dO(x,2L) y=0 y=LMicrofabricated structures Atomic beam 0.5ddAB B A FIG. 7. To explain an absence of shadow-effect at the focal plane y= 2Lfor half-open MSs having the same periods. An illumination of an arbitrary point Oat this focal plane from given slit ABof the second MS is determined by the number of particles moving into the point Oinside angle AOB, i. e. it is proportional to the length of the bold part of A′B′, given by s=|A′B′| −d 2.Since |A′B′|= 2|AB|=d, sis al- ways equal tod 2independently on the point O x−coordinate. Consequently, any variation of the particles’ distributio n at the focal plane y= 2Ldisappears. The geometric picture can also be used to explain the absence of background terms at the focal planes y=n+1 nLproduced by MS having duty cycles (106) and equal periods ( d1=d2=d). One can see from Eq. (102, 104) that the background disappears because there are no particles at the points xq=d n/parenleftbig q+1 2/parenrightbig ,whereq is integral. A geometric interpretation of this result is presented in Fig. 8.Atomic beamx=0d/2dd/8 x0x1 x-1xqy=0 y=L y=4L3Microfabricated structuresFocal plane FIG. 8. To prove that two MS having equal periods (d1=d2=d) and duty cycles f1=1 2andf2=1 2(n+1)(case n= 3 is shown) produce a background-free atomic grating at the focal plane y=n+1 nL,one can notice that points xq=dg/parenleftbig q+1 2/parenrightbig are not achievable for particles ( dg=d nis a grating period). It follows from the fact that an angle, buil t from any point xqand arbitrary slit of the second MS, meets the closed part of the first MS. V. TALBOT-LAU EFFECT When the spatial separation of the MS is increased to the point where L∼LT= 2d2/λdB, (109) it is no longer possible to neglect quantization of the atomic center-of-mass in calculating the transverse mo- tion of the atoms. Just as in the Talbot effect, the recoil an atom undergoes on scattering from a grating must be taken into account. It turns out, however, that the Doppler dephasing and rephasing encountered in analyz- ing the problem of classical scattering by MS still can be given a classical interpretation when L∼LT, pro- vided that the angular divergence of the incident beam is sufficiently large, θb≫d/LT=λdB/d=θd. In other words, even though we must account for quantization of the atoms’ center-of-mass motion, effects related to Doppler dephasing (which are automatically included in a quantized motion approach) are unchanged from the classical case. We have already alluded to this result in the Introduc- tion. Recall that matter-wave interference results from the overlap on the screen of atomic wave functions asso- ciated with states having center-of-mass momenta pand p+n¯hk.The relative dephasing between these states (7) contains a Doppler part (7a) and a quantum part 16(7b). Since the washing out and restoration of the macro- scopic atomic gratings is connected with an averaging over atomic velocities v,one expects that the Doppler part, proportional to v,is responsible for the dephasing- rephasing effect. This contribution is actually classical in nature (i. e. it does not vanish in the limit ¯ h→0) and enters the calculations whether or not the quantum contribution to the phase has to be considered. As a con- sequence, the dephasing-rephasing process is the same for the classical shadow effect and the quantum Talbot-Lau effect. It turns out, however, that for separations of the MS equal to a rational multiple of the Talbot length, the Talbot effect can actually result in a decrease of the period of the atomic gratings from those periods which would result from the classical shadow effect result. The decrease in period occurs for MS consisting of open slits and opaque strips; it would not occur, for example, in resonant standing wave fields. Since the Doppler dephasing determines the position of the focal planes and the period of the atomic grating, one can carry over the results Eqs. (69, 70, 76) obtained in Sec. IV for the shadow effect. In this section, we are in- terested in the variation of the atomic gratings in a given focal plane as a function of the separation of the MS. In other words, we look for those separations Lfor which the Talbot effect significantly modifies the gratings that would have been produced by the shadow effect alone. This is analogous to photon echo studies of atomic re- laxation in which the echo amplitude is monitored as a function of the separation between the excitation pulses. It should be noted that the Talbot-Lau effect has been studied using light by Clauser and Reinsch (1992) for the parameters d1 d2= 3;ye= 3L, (110) corresponding to {m, n, j, ℓ, ¯j,¯ℓ}={3,1,3,1,1,1/3} [recall that ¯j=j/µ;¯ℓ=ℓ/µ, whereµis the largest common factor of j(m−n) andml] and a grating pe- rioddg=d1.The atomic Talbot-Lau effect was demon- strated by Clauser and Li (1994) using K atoms for the parametersd1 d2= 2, ye= 2L, (111) /braceleftbig m, n, j, ℓ, ¯j,¯ℓ/bracerightbig ={2,1,2,1,1,1/2},dg=d1. A the- oretical study of the atomic Talbot-Lau effect was also carried out for the parameters (111) by Carnal et al. (1995). The conclusions as to the period and location of the atomic gratings follows from purely classical con- siderations in this case; there is no need to invoke argu- ments related to the wave nature of matter (Clauser and Reinsch, 1992; Clauser and Li, 1994; Carnal et al., 1995). A. Grating formation The geometry is the same as that considered for the classical shadow effect, except that Lis no longer re- stricted to be less than LT. Again, it is convenient to work in the atomic rest frame defined by t=y/u. As discussed above, it is necessary to quantize the atomic motion only in the x-direction. The atoms undergo scat- tering at the MS at times Ts=Ls/u(T1= 0, T2=T= L/u).For thin gratings, the atomic wave function ψ(x,t) undergoes jumps at the MS given by ψ(x,T+ s) =ηs(x)ψ(x,T− s), (112) whereψ(x,T± s) is the wave function on either side of gratings,ηs(x) is the amplitude transmission function of gratings, and χs(x) =|ηs(x)|2(113) is the transmission function of grating s[for MS consist- ing of a series of slits, ηs(x) =χs(x)]. To characterize the atomic beam using a quantized center-of-mass description, one can use the Wigner dis- tribution function defined by f(x,p,t) =/integraldisplaydˆx 2π¯hexp(−ipˆx/¯h)ψ(x+ˆx 2,t)ψ∗(x−ˆx 2,t). (114) For scattering at a MS, one finds f(x,p,T+ s) =/integraldisplaydˆxdp′ 2π¯hexp [−i(p−p′) ˆx/¯h]ηs/parenleftbigg x+ˆx 2/parenrightbigg η∗ s/parenleftbigg x−ˆx 2/parenrightbigg f/parenleftbig x,p′,T− s/parenrightbig . (115) Whenηs(x) is a periodic function of x, one can write Eq. (115) as f(x,p,T+ s) =/summationdisplay ns,n′ sexp(imsksx)η(s) ns/bracketleftBig η(s) n′ s/bracketrightBig∗ f/bracketleftbigg x,p−¯hk 2(ns+n′ s),T− s/bracketrightbigg , (116) where ms=ns−n′ s, (116a) and 17η(s) n=/integraldisplayds 0dx dse−inksxηs(x) (116b) is a Fourier component of ηs(x),having period dsand wave number ks= 2π/ds. For times other than Ts, the Wigner distribution function evolves freely as f(x,p,t) =f(x−v(t−Ts),p,T+ s), (117) wherev=p/M. Applying Eqs. (116, 117) one obtains the atomic distributio n function for times t>T (y>L ) to be f(x,p,t) =/summationdisplay ni, n′ iη(1) n1/bracketleftBig η(1) n′ 1/bracketrightBig∗ η(2) n2/bracketleftBig η(2) n′ 2/bracketrightBig∗ exp/braceleftbigg im1k1/bracketleftbigg x−v(t−T)−/parenleftbigg v−¯hk2 2M(n2+n′ 2)/parenrightbigg T/bracketrightbigg +im2k2[x−v(t−T)]}f/braceleftbigg x−/bracketleftbigg v−¯hk2 2M(n2+n′ 2)/bracketrightbigg T−v(t−T), p−¯h 2[k1(n1+n′ 1) +k2(n2+n′ 2)]/bracerightbigg , (118) wheref(x,p) is the Wigner distribution function of the incoming atomic beam. The atomic spatial distribution is given by f(x,t) =/integraldisplay dpf(x,p,t) (119) which can be obtained from Eq. (118) as f(x,t) =/summationdisplay ni, n′ iη(1) n1/bracketleftBig η(1) n′ 1/bracketrightBig∗ η(2) n2/bracketleftBig η(2) n′ 2/bracketrightBig∗/integraldisplay dpf/braceleftbigg x−/bracketleftbigg v+¯h 2M(k1(n1+n′ 1) +k2(n2+n′ 2))/bracketrightbigg (t−T) −/bracketleftbigg v+¯hk1 2M(n1+n′ 1)/bracketrightbigg T,p/bracerightbigg exp/braceleftbigg i(m1k1+m2k2)/bracketleftbigg x−¯hk2 2M(n2+n′ 2)/bracketrightbigg (t−T) −i/bracketleftbigg v+¯hk1 2M(n1+n′ 1)/bracketrightbigg [m1k1t+m2k2(t−T)]/bracerightbigg . (120) In this expression terms having ( m1k1+m2k2)∝ne}ationslash= 0 contribute to the atomic gratings. Owing to the assumptio n of an incident beam having large angular divergence θb∼v/u≫d/L, the Doppler phases associated with these terms oscillate rapidly as a function of p, except in the echo focal planes. As a consequence, the posit ions and periods of the atomic gratings are the same as those in the classical sha dow effect [see Eqs. (69, 70, 76)]. In the remainder of this section, we calculate the atomic density in the focal pl anesyeor, equivalently, at times te=ye/ugiven in Eqs. (69, 70). It is possible to simplify Eq. (120) if we assume that the angu lar divergence θbof the incident beam is less than θD=D/L, such that a freely propagating beam would undergo negligib le diffraction over a distance of order L. For p∼Muθ b≪MD/T , one can neglect the dependence on niandn′ iof the distribution function appearing in Eq. (120). Then the sum over nican be carried out using the formula /summationdisplay ne−inαη(s) n/bracketleftBig η(s) n−ν/bracketrightBig∗ =e−iνα/2/bracketleftbigg ηs/parenleftbigg x−α 2ks/parenrightbigg η∗ s/parenleftbigg x+α 2ks/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg ν, (121) where [F(x)]ν=/integraldisplayds 0dx dse−iνksxF(x) (122) is a Fourier component of the function F(x). As a result one finds that the atomic density in the echo foca l planes is given by f(x,te) =f(x)/summationdisplay qeiqkgxχ(1) −¯j(m−n)q/bracketleftbigg η2/parenleftbigg x−qd2φT(m,n) 2π/parenrightbigg η∗ 2/parenleftbigg x+qd2φT(m,n) 2π/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg m¯ℓq, (123) 18whereχ(1) sis a Fourier component of the transmission functionχ1(x), φT(m,n) =¯j2(m−n) ¯ℓωk1T (124) is a Talbot phase associated with a specific focal plane, and f(x) =/integraldisplay dpf(x,p) (125) is the initial spatial distribution in the atomic beam. Since the beam diameter is much larger than the period of the gratings, D≫dg (126) one can neglect the variation of f(x) and setf(x) = 1 in Eq. (123) . The distribution function (123) is identical with the shadow effect result (85), except for the presence of the Talbot phases. The main features of the dependence of the atomic density on the Talbot phase in the Talbot- Lau effect are the same as those for the Talbot effect considered in Sec. III. The density (123) is an oscillating function of φT(m,n) having period 2 π. IfφT(m,n) is in- creased by 2 π, or, equivalently, if the separation between the MS is increased by LT(m,n), the density distribution in the corresponding echo plane is unchanged. The Tal- bot distance associated with a given focal plane is defined here as LT(m,n)≡2d2 1 λdB¯ℓ ¯j2(m−n). (127) In terms of LT(m,n), the Talbot phase (124) is equal to φT(m,n) = 2π[L/L T(m,n)]. (128) In our notation, the Talbot phase is a function of L, while the Talbot distance is independent of L.Notethat, as defined by Eq.(127), there is a different Tal- bot length associated with the signal for different focal planes,ye= (m/n)L. We wish to examine the signal in a given focal plane as a function of the separation Lof the MS or, equivalently, as a function of φT(m,n).When L=LT(m,n) [φT(m,n) = 2π] the atomic density (123) is the same as that of the shadow effect (85). Using arguments similar to those leading to Eqs. (34), one can prove that, for pure amplitude modulation of the wave functions, i. e. for real amplitude transmission functionsηj(x) =η∗ j(x),the dependence of the parti- cles’ distribution on the Talbot phase is symmetric with respect to the point φT(m,n) =π[L=LT(m,n)/2], f(x,te)|φT(m,n)=f(x,te)|2π−φT(m,n), (129) f(x,te)|L=f(x,te)|LT−L. (130) The question arises as to what values of φT(m,n) lead to especially interesting results, i. e. atomic gratings that differ significantly from the gratings that would be produced by the shadow effect. We have found that the atomic gratings are significantly modified by the Talbot effect when the Talbot phase is a rational multiple of 2 π, φT(m,n) = 2πmT nT, (131) wheremTandnTare positive integers having no com- mon factors. We proceed to analyze the atomic density function in the focal planes for separations of the MS cor- responding to Eq. (131), that is, for L=LT(m,n)mT nT. For Talbot phases given by Eq. (131), the sum in Eq. (123) can be divided into nT−1 independent sums having q=nTq′+r (132) where 0 ≤r≤nT.For Talbot phases given by Eq. (131), any dependence on q′disappears in the last factor of Eq. (123), allowing one to rewrite Eq. (123) as f(x,te) =nT−1/summationdisplay r=0/summationdisplay q′/integraldisplayd1 0/integraldisplayd2 0dx1dx2 d1d2exp/braceleftbig i(q′nT+r)/bracketleftbig kgx+¯j(m−n)k1x1−m¯ℓk2x2/bracketrightbig/bracerightbig ×χ1(x1)η2/parenleftbigg x2−rmT nTd2/parenrightbigg η∗ 2/parenleftbigg x2+rmT nTd2/parenrightbigg , (133) to sum over q′using Eq. (89), and to integrate over x1.The calculations are similar to those used to obtain Eq. (93) from Eq. (88), and one can obtain f(x,te) =1 ¯jnT(m−n)nT−1/summationdisplay r=0¯j(m−n)nT−1/summationdisplay s=0/integraldisplayd2 0dx2 d2exp/braceleftbigg2πir nT/bracketleftbigg s+/bracketleftbigg nT/parenleftbigg m¯ℓx2 d2−x dg/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg I/bracketrightbigg/bracerightbigg ×η2/parenleftbigg x2−rmT nTd2/parenrightbigg η∗ 2/parenleftbigg x2+rmT nTd2/parenrightbigg χ1/braceleftbiggd1 ¯j(m−n)nT/bracketleftbigg s+/braceleftbigg nT/parenleftbigg m¯ℓx2 d2−x dg/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg F/bracketrightbigg/bracerightbigg . (134) 19B. Higher-order gratings using the Talbot-Lau technique Equation (134) is the basic result of this section. It gives the atomic density function in the focal plane for separation of the MS that corresponds to Talbot phases which are rational multiples of 2 π. For specified trans- mission functions, it can be evaluated numerically in focal planes defined by te=ye/u= (m/n)T= (m/n)L/ufor arbitrary (j/ℓ) =d1/d2(recall that ¯j=j/µ;¯ℓ=ℓ/µ, whereµis the largest common factor of j(m−n) and ℓm),mTandnT[L=LT(m,n)mT nT]. In this subsec- tion, we are interested primarily in showing that, owing to the Talbot effect, periodic atomic density gratings can be produced whose periods dTare smaller than the cor- responding periods dgwhich would have been produced by the shadow effect. The first thing to note is that the function χ1in Eq. (134), considered as a function of x, is periodic with pe- riod dT=dg/nT, (135) nT−times smaller than the period dgof the shadow- effect grating .Unfortunately, this does not guarantee thatf(x,te) is periodic with period dT, owing to the exponential term in Eq. (134). Under the transforma- tionx→x+dT, the exponential term is multiplied by the phase-factor exp (2πir/n T) (136) which is a function of the summation index r.If the sum- mation over rin Eq. (134) somehow was restricted to r= 0, the atomic grating would have period dT. Re- stricting the summation to r= 0 can be accomplished by choosing the amplitude transmission function such that the product η2/parenleftBig x2−r nTd2/parenrightBig η∗ 2/parenleftBig x2+r nTd2/parenrightBig is nonvan- ishing only for r= 0. To simplify the discussion, we have takenmT= 1 [L=LT(m,n)/nT]. For MS consisting of slits and opaque strips, both the amplitude transmission functions ηj(x) and transmission functionsχj(x) are equal to the Heaviside step-function ηj(x) =χj(x) =θ/parenleftbigg fj−/braceleftbiggx dj/bracerightbigg F/parenrightbigg , (137) wherefjis the duty cycle of MS j. The functions/braceleftBig x2 d2±r nT/bracerightBig Fshown in Fig. 9 represent the profile of the second MS displaced by ±r nTd2.{a}F f2 1-{a}Ff2+1-{a}F10 x2/d2 0 x2/d2f21-{a}F {a}Ff2+{a}F 1{x2/d2-a}F{x2/d2+a}F FIG. 9. Plots of the functions/braceleftbigx2 d2±a/bracerightbig .In the shaded ar- eas only transmissions φ2(x2±ad2)/ne}ationslash= 0.When slits relative width f2<min ({a},1− {a}) there are no shaded areas in the vicinity of the point x2= 0.If also f2<|1−2{a}|, then shaded areas have no common points and product φ2(x2+ad2)φ2(x2−ad2) = 0 for any x2 In the range 0 ≤x2< d 2, the product η2/parenleftBig x2−r nTd2/parenrightBig η∗ 2/parenleftBig x2+r nTd2/parenrightBig =θ/parenleftBig f2−/braceleftBig x2 d2+r nT/bracerightBig F/parenrightBig θ/parenleftBig f2−/braceleftBig x2 d2−r nT/bracerightBig F/parenrightBig , which represents a product of profiles of the second MS displaced by ±r nTd2, vanishes forr∝ne}ationslash= 0 provided that f2is sufficiently small and pro- vided thatr nT∝ne}ationslash=1 2(ifr nT=1 2, the gratings are displaced byd2 2and overlap for any f2). If f2≤min/parenleftbiggr nT,1−r nT/parenrightbigg , (138) the only regions where η2(x2±r nTd2) does not vanish are x2 d2∈/bracketleftbigg 1−r nT, f2+ 1−r nT/bracketrightbigg andx2 d2∈/bracketleftbiggr nT,f2+r nT/bracketrightbigg , (139) respectively. These two intervals have no common re- gions iff2+ 1−r nT≤r nTorf2+r nT≤1−r nT,i. e. if f2≤/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1−2r nT/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle. (140) Inequality (140) must hold for all r∝ne}ationslash= 0 to guarantee that the atomic grating has period dT=dg/nT. Clearly, in- equality (140) does not hold for r=nT 2whennTis even. While this does not preclude the possibility of higher or- der gratings for nTeven, it does suggest that we consider the cases of even and odd nTseparately. 201.nTodd In this case, we write nT= 2n′+ 1, (141) wheren′is a positive integer or zero. For the summation range 0 ≤r≤nT−1 in Eq. (134), the minimum value of the rhs of both inequalities (138) and (140) is 1 /nT, which occurs for r= 1 orr= 2n′in (138) and r=n′or r=n′+ 1 in (140). Thus, provided that f2≤1 2n′+ 1(142) one can produce atomic gratings having period dT= dg/(2n′+ 1) in the focal plane y=m nLfor separations between the MS equal to L=LT (2n′+1)or, equivalently, for a Talbot phase (124) equal to2π 2n′+1. Under these con- ditions one omits terms having r∝ne}ationslash= 0 in Eq. (134) and finds f(x,te) =f2 ¯j(m−n)nT[β′]I/summationdisplay s=0hs(w), (143) hs(w) =/integraldisplay1 0dzθ(β′−(s+{α′z−w}F)),(143a) α′=nTα=m¯ℓ(2n′+ 1)f2, β′=nTβ=¯j(m−n)(2n′+ 1)f1, (143b) whereαandβare given by (96b), and dimensionless variables w=x dT, z=x2 d2f2(144) have been introduced. Note that the ratio α/β=α′/β′=m m−nf2 f1ℓ j=m m−nf2d2 f1d1(145) depends on the focal plane and ratio of slit widths. In a manner similar to arriving at Eq. (102), one can obtain f(x,t) = [α′[β′]I+{β′}F[α′]I+S(w)] ×/bracketleftBig m(m−n)¯ℓ¯j(2n′+ 1)2/bracketrightBig−1 (146) whereS(w) is given by Eqs. (101-101c) with the replace- mentsα→α′, β→β′.1 1 11 1 10.087L=LT/10 10 1 10.093L=LT/7 10.093L=LT/6 10.087L=LT/50 10.083 0 10.093 0 1 0 11/6L=LT 10.094L=LT/13 x/dgAtomic density distribution f(x,te=1.5L/u) 1/6L=LT/2 0.074L=LT/3 L=LT/40.08 0 0.074 0 0.076 0L=LT/80.08 0 0.105 0.061 0 0.083 L=LT/120.083 00.073 0 0.099 0.0670 0.087L=LT/110.08 0 0.11 0.056 00.088L=LT/90.079 0 L=LT/14 L=LT/15 L=LT/16 FIG. 10. Atomic spatial distribution created by two mi- crofabricated structures, having the same spacings d1=d2, relative widths f1=1 2, f2=1 6and separated on the distance L.At the focal plane y=3 2L(m= 3, n= 2), where owing to the shadow effect one expects grating with period dg=d1 2,the wave matter interference leads to the higher order gratings if one chooses distance between fields coinciding with the integer fraction of the Talbot distance/parenleftBig L=LT nT=4d2 1 nTλdB, nT= 1, . . .16/parenrightBig ,which corre- sponds to the Talbot phase φT=2π nT.For sufficiently small relative width of the second microfabricated structu re, f2≤1 nT/parenleftbig f2≤2 nT/parenrightbig ,one observes gratings having spacing dT=dg nT=d1 2nT/parenleftBig dT=2dg nT=d1 nT/parenrightBig for distance between fields equal to the odd (even) fraction part of the Talbot distance, i. e. for odd (even) nT.Exceptions here are the cases when nTis multiple 4/parenleftbig L=LT 4, L=LT 8, L=LT 12/parenrightbig , where for f2≤2 nTwave-matter interference leads to the en- tire washing out of the gratings. The amplitude of the grating (146) is maximum when m=n+ 1, j=ℓ= 1,and {α′}F={β′}F=1 2, (147) for which f1=2q1+ 1 2 (2n′+ 1), f2=2q2+ 1 2 (n+ 1)(2n′+ 1),(148) where 0 ≤q1≤2n′,0≤q2≤nare integers .Under these conditions one finds f(x,te) =q1q2+1 2(q1+q2) +/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/braceleftbigg xn(2n′+1) d1/bracerightbigg F−1 2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle (n+ 1)(2n′+ 1)2. (149) This grating has amplitude 21A= 1//bracketleftBig 2 (n+ 1)(2n′+ 1)2/bracketrightBig (150) and a background term whose amplitude is (2 q1q2+q1+ q2) times larger than A. Talbot-Lau gratings for different values of the Talbot phase are shown in Fig. 10. 2.nTeven The atomic density patterns in Fig. 10 have been drawn for both even and odd values of nT.From this figure one sees that qualitatively new features appear for even values of nT. When the Talbot phase φT(m,n) = π, π/3, π/5 (nT= 2,6,10) gratings having period dg, dg/3, dg/5,or d′ T= 2dg/nT=dg/(nT/2) (151)are focused. When the Talbot phase φT(m,n) = π/2, π/4, π/6 (nT= 4,8,12), the gratings are washed out entirely. To explain these results one needs to return to the general expression (134). If nT= 2n′, (152) wheren′is a positive integer, one divides the sum over r in Eq. (134) into two parts having r=n′q+r′, (153) withq= 0 or 1 with r′restricted to the range 0 ≤r′≤ n′−1.In the second part ( q= 1) one shifts the inte- gration variable from x2to/parenleftbig x2+1 2d2/parenrightbig ,which leads to the same factors η2, η∗ 2, χ1in both the q= 0 andq= 1 terms. In this manner, one arrives at the expression f(x,te) =1 2¯jn′(m−n)n′−1/summationdisplay r′=02¯j(m−n)n′−1/summationdisplay s=0/integraldisplayd2 0dx2 d2/braceleftbigg 1 + (−1)/bracketleftbig (r′+n′)mTm¯ℓ+s+/bracketleftbig 2n′/parenleftbig m¯ℓ(x2 d2−x dg/parenrightbig/bracketrightbig I/bracketrightbig/bracerightbigg ×exp/braceleftbiggπir′ n′/bracketleftbigg s+/bracketleftbigg 2n′/parenleftbigg m¯ℓx2 d2−x dg/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg I/bracketrightbigg/bracerightbigg η2/parenleftBig x2−r′mT 2n′d2/parenrightBig ×η∗ 2/parenleftBig x2+r′mT 2n′d2/parenrightBig χ1/braceleftbiggd1 ¯j(m−n)nT/bracketleftbigg s+/braceleftbigg 2n′/parenleftbigg m¯ℓx2 d2−x dg/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg F/bracketrightbigg/bracerightbigg . (154) The transmission function χ1still has period dg/nT= dg/(2n′), but the first factor in the integrand has twice this period, dT= 2dg/nT=dg/n′. As in the case of odd nT, one must choose f2sufficiently small to eliminate all but ther′= 0 terms in the sum to ensure that the atomic grating has period dT. Inequalities (138) and (140) are satisfied if f2≤1 2n′, (155) which is a sufficient condition for neglect of terms with r′∝ne}ationslash= 0 in Eq. (154) .As a result one arrives at f(x,te) =f2 2¯jn′(m−n)[β′]I/summationdisplay s=0hs(w), (156) hs(w) =/integraldisplay1 0dz/parenleftBig 1 + (−1)n′mTm¯ℓ+s+[α′z−w]I/parenrightBig ×θ{β′−[s+{α′z−w}F]}, (156a) α′=nTα= 2n′m¯ℓf2; (156b) β′=nTβ= 2n′¯j(m−n)f1; (156c) w=x dT. (156d) This expression can be evaluated in the same man- ner used to evaluate Eq. (143), but the evaluation ismore complicated owing to two factors: (i) contributions hs(w) withs <[β′]Iare not independent of w,and (ii) fors= [β′]Ione has to consider separately contributions from odd and even [ α′z−w]I.The situation simplifies for integerβ′,when theθ-factor equals 1 for s<β′and 0 fors=β′, independent of the values of z, w, andα′. This is the only limit considered in the subsection. For integerβ′, one can carry out the summation over sin Eq. (156). For evenβ′,when/summationtextβ′−1 s=0(−1)s= 0,the gratings are washed out and f(x,t) =f1f2. (157) This result is consistent with the vanishing of the atomic gratings in Fig. 10 for Talbot phases equal to π/2, π/4 andπ/6, corresponding to values of β′equal to 2,4,6. Whenβ′is odd one finds f(x,t) =f1f2/parenleftBigg 1 +(−1)n′mTm¯ℓ α′β′h′(w)/parenrightBigg , (158) h′(w) =α′/braceleftbigg 2/integraldisplay1 0dzθ/bracketleftbigg1 2−/braceleftbiggα′z−w 2/bracerightbigg F/bracketrightbigg −1/bracerightbigg , (158a) where the equality 22(−1)[x]I≡2θ/bracketleftbigg1 2−/braceleftBigx 2/bracerightBig F/bracketrightbigg −1 (159) has been used. Equation (158a) can be reduced toEq.(99) with the replacements β, α , w →1 2,α′ 2,w 2. Using these values in Eqs. (101a,101b), one obtains h′(w) = 2    /braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F−w, 0<w< 2/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F, −/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F, 2/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F<w< 1, w−1−/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F,1<w< 1 + 2/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F,/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F, 1 + 2/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F<w< 2,for/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F<1 2   1−/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F, 0<w< 2/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F−1,/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F−w, 2/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F−1<w< 1,/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F−1, 1<w< 2/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F, w−1−/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F,1 + 2/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F<w< 2,for/braceleftBig α′ 2/bracerightBig F>1 2. (160) 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0/23/2 Talbot phaseT=22 /23/20.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0Grating amplitude A(L)Grating amplitude A(L) L LTye=3/2L ye= 2L FIG. 11. Gratings’ amplitudes A(L) at the focal planes y= 2Landy=3 2Las a function of the distance Lbetween microfabricated structures. Two separated microfabricat ed structures have the same period ( d1=d2) and relative width f1=1 2, f2=1 4. This expression describes an atomic grating having pe- riod ∆w= 2 or ∆x=dg n′, which isn′times narrower than that caused by the shadow effect. For the param- eters chosen in Fig. 10, values of the Talbot phase are equal toφT(m,n) =π/n′(n′= 1,3 or 5),α′=β′=n′, and the atomic density is given byf(x,te) =1 12/braceleftbigg 1−2 n′2/bracketleftbigg/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2/braceleftbiggnn′x d1/bracerightbigg F−1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle−1 2/bracketrightbigg/bracerightbigg . (161) Since the atomic density is a periodic function of the distance between the MS having period LT, the depen- dence of the grating amplitude Aat a given focal plane must also be a periodic function of Lhaving period LT for a fixed value of the ratio ye/L. One period of A(L) is shown in Fig. 11 at the focal planes ye= 2L,3L/2. This dependence is plotted for values of Lequal to ra- tional multiples of the Talbot length L=mT nTLT. One can not expect the dependence of A(L) to be smooth, because the transmission function (137) is discontinuous; even small changes in the ratiomT nTcan lead to dramatic changes in the atomic density (134). C. Comparison of the Talbot and Talbot-Lau effects Qualitatively, the transition from the shadow effect to the Talbot-Lau effect for a beam having a large angular divergence that is scattered by two MS parallels the tran- sition from spatial modulation to Talbot self-imaging of a collimated beam that is scattered by a single MS. Sim- ilarities and differences of these transitions, which oc- cur when the characteristic length scale in the problem changes from L≪LTtoL∼LT,can be summarized as follows: 23−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− −−−−−− Transition from shadow to Talbot-like profile (collimated beam)Transition from shadow effect to Talbot-Lau effect (divergent beam) Atomic density is a periodic function of the distance Lbetween the MS and the screen having period LT= 2d2 λdB.Atomic density at a given focal plane y=m nLis a periodic function of the distance Lbetween the two separated MS ,having period LT=2d2 1 λdB¯ℓ ¯j2(m−n). Higher order gratings (with respect to the MS-grating) can be obtained at distances L=LT nT; if, for example, nTis odd, an atomic grating having periodd nTis pro- duced if the MS’s duty cycle f <1 nT.Higher order gratings (with respect to those focused in the shadow-effect-regime) can be obtained at distances L=LT nT; if, for example, nTis odd, an atomic grating having periodd1¯jnn Tis produced if the second MS’s duty cyclef2<1 nT. The atomic grating’s profile is the same as MS’s profile, no compression occurs.The atomic grating’s profile is the corresponding shadow effect grating’s profile compressed by a factor nT. −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− −−−−−− D. Additional examples including a quantum Talbot-Lau effect To make some connection with previous work, we ana- lyze the atomic density for the parameters of Eq. (111), corresponding to the Talbot-Lau effect studied theoreti- cally by Carnal et al. (1995) and realized experimentally by Clauser and Li (1994). The appropriate parameters are/braceleftbig m, n, j, ℓ, ¯j,¯ℓ/bracerightbig ={2,1,2,1,1,1/2}, dg=d1, LT(2,1) =d2 1 λdB,d1= 2d2 (162) When the distance between the MS is L=LT(2,1) 2, cor- responding to φT=π[the case analyzed by Carnal et al. (1995)], one has nT= 2n′=LT(2,1)/L= 2, and the corresponding values of α′andβ′obtained from Eqs. (156) are α′= 2f2, β′= 2f1. (163) As in (Carnal et al., 1995), we choose f2=1 2andf1=1 2 orf1=1 4.In order to apply the results of Sec. V.B.2, it is necessary that f2≤1/nT= 1/2; clearly, this require- ment is met. Whenf1=1 2, the parameter β′is an integer ( β′= 1) and one can use Eqs. (158, 160) to obtain the atomic density f(x,te) =1 2/parenleftbigg 1−/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2/braceleftbiggx d1/bracerightbigg F−1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/parenrightbigg , (164) coinciding with the profile obtained by Carnal et al. (1995). Since in this case both parameters α′andβ′are integers, the shadow effect does not lead to the any atomic grating (see below). The grating (164) arises en- tirely as a result of matter-wave interference. Whenf1=1 4,the parameter β′=1 2,and one has to return to Eq. (156), in which only the s= 0 term in the sum contributes. Carrying out the integration in Eq. (156a), one finds f(x,te) =  0, for/braceleftBig x d1/bracerightBig F≤1 4/braceleftBig x d1/bracerightBig F−1 4, for1 4≤/braceleftBig x d1/bracerightBig F≤1 2 1 4, for1 2≤/braceleftBig x d1/bracerightBig F≤3 4 1−/braceleftBig x d1/bracerightBig F, for3 4≤/braceleftBig x d1/bracerightBig F≤1,(165) coinciding with the distribution calculated by Carnal et al. (1995). To compare this profile with that caused by the shadow effect, one finds from Eqs. (102, 101c), that the shadow effect distribution function is given by f(x,te)|shadow =f(x−d1 2,te). Thus, owing to matter- wave interference, the atomic grating (165) is shifted by a half-period from the grating that would have been pro- duced by the shadow effect alone. In general, the atomic gratings produced when a beam scatters from two, separated MS cannot be attributed entirely to quantum effects since the classical shadow effect contributes to grating formation. If the parame- ters are chosen in such a way, however, that the classical shadow effect vanishes, then any atomic gratings that are formed can be attributed solely to quantum matter- wave interference. We have already alluded to this result above. Returning to Eqs. (101, 102), one finds that the shadow effect grating S(w) disappears if the parameters 24α=m¯ℓf2orβ=¯j(m−n)f1are integers. One can guarantee that αis integral by choosing f1=f2=1 2, n= 1, m= 2, j= 1, ℓ= 1,(166) which corresponds to ye= 2L,d1=d2,¯j=¯ℓ= 1, α= 1,β=1 2and a Talbot phase φT= 2πL LT(2,1). The atomic density in this focal plane as a function of Talbot phase is shown in Fig. 12. x/dgAtomic density distribution f(x,te=2L/u)10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25 10.37 0.130 0.25L << LT L=1/31LT L=2/31LT L=3/31LT L=4/31LT L=5/31LT L=6/31LT L=7/31LT L=8/31LT L=9/31LT L=10/31LT L=11/31LT L=15/31LT L=14/31LT L=13/31LT L=12/31LT FIG. 12. An evolution of the atomic spatial distribution at the echo-point t= 2T(focal plane y= 2L),induced by two separated microfabricated structures having the same spac - ings and 50% relative widths/parenleftbig f1=f2=1 2/parenrightbig , with an increase of the distance Lbetween structures on the scale of the Tal- bot distance LT.Chosen case allows exclude any influence of the classical shadow effect and interpret the atomic grating as an exact consequence of the wave-matter interference. Th e atomic grating as a function of Lis monitored for L <1 2LT with step1 31LTstarting from the point where one has no in- fluence of the atom interference. Gratings at1 2LT< L≤LT can be obtained using the relation (130). VI. TALBOT AND TALBOT–LAU EFFECTS IN A THERMAL ATOMIC BEAM. Up to this point, all effects related to a distribution of longitudinal velocities uin the atomic beam have been neglected. Averaging over uis not important for the shadow effect since the focal planes are located at ye= (m/n)L, independent of u. In both the Talbot and Talbot-Lau effects, the Talbot phase depends on the Talbot length LT= 2d2/λdB, which, in turn, is pro- portional to uowing to the presence of the De Broglie wavelength. To achieve the maximum contrast in the Talbot and Talbot-Lau effects, it is necessary to longi- tudinally cool the atomic beam (Clauser and Li, 1994).The results of Secs. IV and VI must be averaged over uonce changes in the Talbot phase originating from the distribution of longitudinal velocities becomes of order unity. For a thermal beam having a Maxwellian distri- bution over longitudinal velocities, the averaging can be carried out using the function tabulated by Kruse and Ramsey (1951). For other distributions numerical inte- gration is needed. Such calculations are not included in this contribution. pp-kp+kp+nk p+nkd/2 d/2nGrating profile MS ScreenL>>LT Incident beam d FIG. 13. An origin of the Talbot effect in the thermal beam at an asymptotic distance L > L T.When incident beam of atoms having momenta psplits in a set of scattered beams having momenta p±n¯hk.The wave functions of the states associated with momenta p+¯hkandp−¯hk,p+2¯hk andp−2¯hk, . . .p+n¯hkandp−n¯hkacquire the same Tal- bot phase and therefore no dephasing between these states occurs, independently on the distance Land atomic veloc- ityu.Interference of these states remains at the asymptotic distance, leads to the 2nd, 4th . . .harmonics in the atomic distribution which form the 2 −order atomic grating on the screen. Instead, we examine the role of the longitudinal ve- locity distribution when the width ¯ uof the longitudinal velocity distribution is of order of the average velocity, ¯u∼u (167) for distances (D/d)LT≫y≫LT (168) in the Talbot effect and separations Lbetween the MS (D/d)LT≫L≫LT (168a) in the Talbot-Lau effect. We want to examine whether or not it is possible under these conditions to obtain atomic gratings having periods smaller than the MS producing the scattering. 25To understand how the gratings can survive the aver- age over longitudinal velocities u, one should note that it is the atomic density (30) and not the wave function amplitude that is averaged. The phase factors in the atomic density depending on the Talbot phase can be unity for specific combinations of the spatial harmonics in the atomic wave functions. The way in which this can be achieved is illustrated in Fig. 13. When one com- bines on the screen components of the scattered atomic states associated with momenta ¯ hkand−¯hk,2¯hkand −2¯hk, ..., etc., the amplitudes of the combining states acquire the same Talbot phases since the energy of the scattered atoms does not depend on the direction of scat- tering. The interference from these pairs of states leads to a superposition of atomic gratings having period d/2, d/4, etc.; the overall period of the grating is d/2. Grat- ings originated from Talbot-Lau effect can survive in a similar manner. A. Atomic density profile for a thermal beam. 1. Talbot effect Consider first the Talbot effect, i. e., the atomic grat- ing produced when an atomic beam having negligible an- gular divergence, but a finite spread of longitudinal ve- locities, is scattered by a MS having period d. For a given u, the atomic density in the plane y=utis given by [see Eqs. (28, 30)] fu(x,t) =/summationdisplay n,n′ηnη∗ n′exp/bracketleftbig i(n−n′)kx−i/parenleftbig n2−n′2/parenrightbig φt(u)/bracketrightbig , (169) where the Talbot phase φt(u) =ωkt=ωky/u, as given by Eq. (29), is a function of ufor fixedy. Recall that ηnis a Fourier component of the amplitude transmission functionη(x). Since the Talbot phase is much greater than unity in the asymptotic region (168), the distribu- tion (169) oscillates rapidly as a function of u.After av- eraging over u,a non-zero result arises from only those terms having n′=±n. (170) There is a constant background term ¯f( for a MS con- sisting of an array of slits, ¯fis equal to the duty cycle f of the MS) corresponding to contributions with n′=n and an interference term ˜f(x,t) corresponding to contri- butions from n′=−n. Neglecting all other terms, one finds f(x,t) =¯f+˜f(x,t), (171) where¯f=/summationdisplay n|ηn|2=/integraldisplayd 0dx′ dχ(x′), (171a) and ˜f(x,t) =/integraldisplayd 0dx′ d/integraldisplayd 0dx′′ dη(x′)η∗(x′′) ×/summationdisplay n/ne}ationslash=0exp [ink(2x−x′−x′′)]. (171b) The atomic density profile has a period given by dg=d 2. (172) Note that the density profile is independent of tfor the timest≫LT/uunder consideration. To evaluate the atomic distribution (171), it is conve- nient to introduce new variables ¯x=1 2(x′+x′′),ˆx=x′−x′′. (173) After adding and subtracting a term having n= 0 in Eq. (171b) one can carry out the summation to obtain d 2/summationtext sδ/parenleftbig ¯x−x−sd 2/parenrightbig , making use of Eq. (40). Switch- ing integration variables from ( x′,x′′) to (¯x, ˆx) one sees that theδ−functions having s= 0 and 1 are the only ones that contribute to the sum, and it follows from Eq. (171b) that f(x,t) =¯f−/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/integraldisplayd 0dx′ dη(x′)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 +1 2/bracketleftbigg F(x) +F/parenleftbigg x+d 2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg , (174) where F(¯x) =/integraldisplay |ˆx|<2 min(¯ x,d−¯x)dˆx dη/parenleftbigg ¯x+ˆx 2/parenrightbigg η∗/parenleftbigg ¯x−ˆx 2/parenrightbigg . (175) For a transmission function corresponding to a peri- odic array of slits having duty cycle f, one finds ¯f=/integraltextd 0dx′ dχ(x′) =f,and F(x) =/braceleftBigg 2/parenleftBig f−2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/braceleftbigx d/bracerightbig F−f 2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/parenrightBig ,for/braceleftbigx d/bracerightbig F<f 0,for/braceleftbigx d/bracerightbig F>f. (176) Whenf <1 2,the twoF−functions in Eq. (174) do not overlap with one another, and the atomic density is given by f(x,t) =f(1−f) + 2  w, for 0<w<f 2 f−w,forf 2<w<f 0, forf <w<1 2, (177) 26wherew=1 2/braceleftbig2x d/bracerightbig F.This function has periodd 2. For f >1 2one arrives at the distribution f(x,t) =f(1−f) + 2  f−1 2,for 0<w<f −1 2 w, forf−1 2<w<f 2 f−w,forf 2<w<1 2, (178) which also has periodd 2. The amplitude of the atomic grating (177, 178) is given by A= min [f,(1−f)]. (179) The manner in which the atomic density profile changes as yvaries from y≪LTtoy≫LTis shown in Fig. 14. 0 d/2 d0101010101 df df df df dff=0.8f=0.6f=0.5f=0.4f=0.2Atomicdensitydistribution x FIG. 14. Talbot effect in the thermal beam. The initial atomic distribution (dashed lines), created just after pas sing through the microfabricated structure with the slits’ rela tive width fand spasing d,transforms into the second order gart- ing/parenleftbig having spacingd 2/parenrightbig on the distance much larger than the Talbot distance owing to the wave-matter interference.2. Talbot-Lau effect To evaluate the Talbot-Lau density profile in the asymptotic limit (168), one must return to Eq. (123) and average it over longitudinal velocities. Using the Fourier expansion of the amplitude transmission func- tions in Eq. (123) and setting the smooth envelope func- tionf(x) equal to unity, one finds f(x,te) =/summationdisplay q,n2exp/parenleftbig iq/bracketleftbig kgx−φT(m,n;u)/parenleftbig 2n2−m¯ℓq/parenrightbig/bracketrightbig/parenrightbig ×χ(1) −¯j(m−n)qη(2) n2/bracketleftBig η(2) n2−m¯ℓq/bracketrightBig∗ , (180) whereφT(m,n;u) is given by (124) . On averaging over uforφT(m,n;u)≫1, one finds that only those terms in the sum having q= 0 or n2=m¯ℓq 2, q∝ne}ationslash= 0 (181) contribute to the density. The q= 0 term is a back- ground, given by ¯f1¯f2[¯fjis defined in terms of χjin the same way that ¯fis defined in terms of χin Eq. (171a)] , while the terms satisfying Eq. (181) lead to the atomic grating. Explicitly, one finds f(x,te) =¯f1/bracketleftBigg ¯f2−/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/integraldisplaydx2 d2η2(x2)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2/bracketrightBigg +˜f(x,te),(182) ˜f(x,te) =/summationdisplay qexp (iqkgx)χ(1) −¯j(m−n)qF(2) m¯ℓq,(182a) where the summation over qincludesq= 0 and other val- ues ofqleading to integral n2in Eq. (181). The function F(2) νis a Fourier component of the function F2(x) defined in terms of η2(x) in the same way that Fis defined in terms ofηin Eq. (175) .The density is independent of te for spatial separations L≫LTof the MS. Whenm¯ℓis even, all qare allowed according to Eq. (181). When m¯ℓis odd, only even values qcontribute, which means that the grating (182a) has a period equal todg/2.Equation (182a) has the same structure as Eq. (85). Repeating the calculations leading to Eq. (93) one arrives at the formula ˜f(x,te) =1 ¯j(m−n)¯j(m−n)−1/summationdisplay s=0/integraldisplayd2 0dx2 d2F2(x2) ×χ1/braceleftbiggd1 ¯j(m−n)/bracketleftbigg s+/braceleftbigg ξ/parenleftbigg m¯ℓx2 d2−x dg/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg F/bracketrightbigg/bracerightbigg ,(183) where ξ=/braceleftbigg1 2,form¯ℓeven odd. (184) Consider now the case of MS having transmission func- tions (94), when the function F2(x) is given by the rhs 27of Eq. (176) with dandfreplaced by d2andf2.Using dimensionless variables w=ξx/d g, z=x2/f2d2, (185) one arrives at equations that are the analogues of Eqs. (96), namely f(x,te) =f1f2(1−f2) +˜f(x,te), (186) ˜f(x,te) =f2 2 ¯j(m−n)[β]I/summationdisplay s=0hs(w), (186a) hs(w) =/integraldisplay1 0dz˜F(z)θ(β−(s+{αz−w}F)),(186b) ˜F(z) = 4/braceleftbiggz,forz<1 21 2−z,forz>1 2, (186c) α=ξm¯ℓf2, β=¯j(m−n)f1. (186d)Omitting further calculations which are essentially the same as those used to derive Eqs. (101, 102), one finds ˜f(x,te) =f2 2 ¯j(m−n) [β]I+[α]I/summationdisplay s=1F(as,bs) +f′(w) , (187) where F(a,b)≡/integraldisplayb adz˜F(z) (188) is given by F(a,b) =  2/parenleftbig b2−a2/parenrightbig max (a,b)≤1 2 4b−2/parenleftbig a2+b2/parenrightbig −1a≤1 2≤b 2 (b−a)(2−b−a) min (a,b)≥1 2, (189) the quantities asandbsare given in the Appendix by Eqs. (A3, A5), and f′(w) =  F/parenleftbig a[α]I+1,1/parenrightbig , for 0≤w≤1− {β}F F/parenleftbig a[α]I+1,1/parenrightbig +F(0,b0),for 1− {β}F≤w≤ {α}F F(0,b0), for{α}F≤w≤1 +{α}F− {β}F F(0,b0) +F/parenleftbig b[α]I,1/parenrightbig ,for 1 + {α}F− {β}F≤w≤1  ,if{β}F≥max ({α}F,1− {α}F), (190) f′(w) =  F/parenleftbig a[α]I+1,1/parenrightbig , for 0≤w≤ {α}F 0, for{α}F≤w≤1− {β}F F(0,b0), for 1− {β}F≤w≤1 +{α}F− {β}F F(0,b0) +F/parenleftbig b[α]I,1/parenrightbig ,for 1 + {α}F− {β}F≤w≤1  ,if{α}F≤ {β}F≤1− {α}F,(190a) f′(w) =  F/parenleftbig a[α]I+1,b[α]I+1/parenrightbig , for 0≤w≤ {α}F− {β}F F/parenleftbig a[α]I+1,1/parenrightbig , for{α}F− {β}F≤w≤1− {β}F F(0,b0) +F/parenleftbig a[α]I+1,1/parenrightbig ,for 1− {β}F≤w≤ {α}F F(0,b0), for{α}F≤w≤1  ,if 1− {α}F≤ {β}F≤ {α}F,(190b) f′(w) =  F/parenleftbig a[α]I+1,b[α]I+1/parenrightbig ,for 0≤w≤ {α}F− {β}F F/parenleftbig a[α]I+1,1/parenrightbig , for{α}F− {β}F≤w≤ {α}F 0, for{α}F≤w≤1− {β}F F(0,b0), for 1− {β}F≤w≤1  ,if{β}F≤min ({α}F,1− {α}F).(190c) In principle one can use Eqs. (182, 187, 190) to derive a general analytical expression for the atomic density dis- tribution, but, given the large number of cases, such an expression is of limited use. Instead, one can write a computer code based on Eqs. (182, 187, 190) to obtain the atomic density profile. Using this code, we varied the duty cycles of the MS to optimize the atomic gratingamplitude in the focal planes y=n+1 nLforn= 1−4 and equal periods of the MS, j=ℓ= 1.Calculations show that one has to choose f1=f2=1 2(191) in all cases except n= 3,where the optimal duty cycles 28are given by f1=1 2, f2=1 4. (192) For these optimal values of the duty cycles, it is a sim- ple matter to obtain analytical expressions for the atomic density profile in a given focal plane. For example, at the echo planey= 2L(n= 1, m= 2) the parameters αand βare equal 1 and1 2, respectively, and the atomic density is given by f(x,te) =1 8+1 4{F(a1,b1) +θ/parenleftbigg w−1 2/parenrightbigg [F(0,b0) +F(b1,1)]/bracerightbigg ,(193) wherew=/braceleftBig x d1/bracerightBig F, b0,1=w∓1 2, a1=w.Using Eq. (189) one arrives at the atomic grating profile f(x,te) =1 4/braceleftbigg 1 + 2w(1−2w),forw<1 2 3−2w(3−2w),forw>1 2.(194) x/d1ye=2L ye=3/2L ye=4/3Lye=5/4L 0 10.050.10.150.20.250.3Atomic density distribution f(x,te=ye/u) FIG. 15. Talbot-Lau effect in the thermal beam. The atomic density distribution at the different focal planes y plotted for the optimum relative widths of the separated mi- crofabricated structutres ( f1=1 2andf2=1 2in all cases ex- ept that for focal plane y=4 3L,where f2=1 4).The distance between fields is assumed to be much larger than the Talbot distance. In spite on this, one can observe higher-order spa - tial gratings. Moreover, one finds from Eqs. (102, 101) that for optimum widths there are no gratings caused by classi- cal shadow effect and conclude that using microfabricated structures one observes gratings originated entirely from the wave-matter interference.Similar calculations leads to the atomic grating profiles f(x,te) =1 36/braceleftbigg 9 + 2w(1−2w),forw<1 2 11−2w(3−2w),forw>1 2(194a) at the focal plane y=3 2L,wherew=/braceleftBig 4x d1/bracerightBig F; f(x,te) =1 8/braceleftbigg 1 +w(1−2w),forw<1 2 2−w(3−2w),forw>1 2(194b) at the focal plane y=4 3L,wherew=/braceleftBig 3x d1/bracerightBig F; and f(x,te) =1 100/braceleftbigg25 + 2w(1−2w),forw<1 2 27−2w(3−2w),forw>1 2(194c) at the focal plane y=5 4L,wherew=/braceleftBig 8x d1/bracerightBig F.These atomic density profiles are shown in Fig. 15. Since the optimal duty cycles (191, 192) correspond to the limit where the shadow effect vanishes, the density profiles (194) cannot be vestiges of the shadow effect. They must originate from matter-wave interference. One can com- pare the density profile (194a), valid for distances Lbe- tween the MS larger than the Talbot distance, with that of Fig. 10 for L∼LT(Talbot-Lau effect). VII. CONCLUSION Atom interferometry is an emerging field of atomic, molecular and optical physics. In this review, we have focused on the scattering of atoms by one or more mi- crofabricated structures (MS). We have seen that the scattering can be described in purely classical terms for characteristic length scales L≪LT, whereLTis the so- called Talbot length. For L>∼LT, a classical description of the atomic center-of-mass motion is no longer ade- quate. Our approach has relied on an interpretation of the phenomena in terms of the recoil an atom acquires when it is scattered from a MS. With this approach, we could make a connection with the theory of coherent transients, for which a rich literature has already been developed. We have considered both collimated beams (Talbot effect) and beams having large angular diver- gence (shadow effect, Talbot-Lau effect) and have allowed for a broad distribution of longitudinal velocities in the atomic beam (Talbot and Talbot-Lau effects in a thermal beam). The next step would be to extend our consider- ations to regimes corresponding to Bragg scattering and Fraunhofer diffraction, allowing for an analysis of atom interferometers which split atomic wave functions into nonoverlapping paths. Scattering of atoms by MS shares both similarities and differences with scattering of atoms by standing-wave op- tical fields (SW). Similarities include a periodical recov- ery of the atomic interference pattern at multiples of the 29Talbot distance (32) [or (127) for the Talbot-Lau effect], a compression of the atomic gratings with respect to the periods of the MS or SW, spatial separation of the higher order atomic gratings in different focal planes, and split- ting of the incident beam into an infinite set of scattered beams having momenta ( p±n¯hk). The differences are due in large part to the nature of the scattering. The MS produce a piecewise continuous atomic density profile while the SW produce a smooth atomic density profile. As a result, the decrease in period relative to that of the classical shadow effect observed in the Talbot-Lau effect using MS does not occur for scattering by standing-wave fields. Moreover, the possibility of observing a Talbot- Lau effect caused entirely by matter-wave interference (see Fig. 12) does not occur for the smooth amplitude modulation by SW (Dubetsky and Berman, 1994). In the case of scattering by MS, the fact that the shadow effect does not give rise to atomic gratings in the focal planey= 2Lfor MS having duty cycles fi=1 2,is di- rectly related to the stepwise amplitude modulation of the atomic beam produced by the MS, as is evident from Fig. 7. For scattering by MS, the qualitative nature of the atomic density profile depends on the properties of the incident atomic beam. When one observes the Talbot effect using a monovelocity beam, the atomic gratings are discontinuous functions (see Fig. 3), but when one averages these gratings over longitudinal velocities, the atomic density is transformed into a piecewise continu- ous profile (compare with Fig. 14). Similarly, the shadow effect and Talbot-Lau effect atomic gratings (which are averaged over transverse velocities) are piecewise contin - uous, but they are transformed into profiles which are discontinuous only in the second derivative when aver- aged over longitudinal velocities (compare Figs. 10 and 15). These examples show that averaging over transverse or longitudinal velocities tends to smooth out the atomic density profiles. It is clear that many of the situations analyzed in this chapter have direct applications to atom lithography. We can expect that future developments in this emerging field will incorporate many of the basic ideas which have been encountered in our discussion. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are pleased to acknowledge helpful discussions with J. L. Cohen and Yu. V. Rozhdestvensky. This material is based upon work supported by the U. S. Army Re- search office under grant number DAAH04-93-G-0503, by the National Science Foundation under grant PHY- 9414020 and by the National Science Foundation through the Center for Ultrafast Optical Science under STC PHY 8920108.APPENDIX: A method for calculating the integral h[β]I(w) =/integraldisplay1 0dzθ[{β}F− {αz−w}F], (A1) with 0 ≤w≤1 is presented here. The function θis the Heaviside step function and [ a]Iand{a}Frefer to the integral and fractional parts of a. Depending on the val- ues of the parameters α, βandwthe integrand in this equation can jump from 0 to 1 several times inside the rangez∈[0,1].The value of the integral is the total length of the intervals in this range where ζ(z)≡ {αz−w}F≤ {β}F. (A2) To determine this length one needs to find the values of zfor which the function {αz−w}Fequals 0 and where it equals {β}F.This function is shown in Fig. 16. 1-w{}F b0a1b1a[]Ib[]Ia[]I+1b[]I+1{z-w}F zz=1 FIG. 16. Function {αz−w}undergoes jumps at the points ar= (r−1 +w)/αand is equal to {β}at the points br= (r−1 +w+{β})/α. For [ α]>1 and 1 ≤r≤[α], ar<1,i. e. contribution to Eq. (99) from interim/bracketleftbig a1, a[α]/bracketrightbig is ([α]−1) (br−ar); when w >1−{β}one gets term b0from [0, a1]; term from z∈/bracketleftbig a[α], b[α]/bracketrightbig is equal to {β}/αor 1−a[α] forb[α]<1 orb[α]>1; in the same manner one calculates term from interim/bracketleftbig a[α]+1, b[α]+1/bracketrightbig in different possible cases. Whenαz−w=r−1,whereris an integer, ζ(z) = 0, i. e. zeros of ζ(z) are given by z=ar= (r−1 +w)/α. (A3) Forz> a rthe function ζ(z) evolves as 30ζ(z) =α(z−ar) (A4) and equals {β}Fat the point z=br=ar+{β}F α= (r−1 +w+{β}F)/α. (A5) Since contributions to the integral (A1) vanish unless ar≤1 andbr≥0 and since 0 ≤w≤1, it follows from Eqs. (A3, A5) that 0 ≤r≤(1+[α]I). For the time being, we assume that α>1. All intervals [ ar,br] totally or partially within the range [0,1] contribute to the integral (A1). Let us de- note the contribution from the range [ ar,br] byArand the total value of the integral by h[β]I(w) =1+[α]I/summationdisplay r=0Ar. (A6) Whenar>0 andbr<1 the interval [ ar,br] lies entirely to the range [0 ,1] and Ar=br−ar={β}F α;ar>0 andbr<1 (A7) When 1> ar>0 andbr≥1, the maximum value of z contributing to the integral (A1) is z= 1 and Ar= 1−ar; 1>ar>0 andbr≥1 (A8) Similarly, for ar<0 and 0<br<1, Ar=br;ar<0 and 0<br<1 (A8a) and forbr≤0, Ar= 0;br≤0 (A8b) For givenr,α, andβ, the values of arandbrcan depend onw, giving rise to a dependence of h[β]Ionw. Note that (br−ar)≤1, which follows from Eqs. (A5) and the assumption that α>1. We first consider the range 1 ≤r≤[α]I−1, for which br<1 andar>0 for anyw∈[0,1]. It then follows from Eq. (A7) that the total contribution A′to the integral (A1) from the region/bracketleftbig a1,b[α]I−1/bracketrightbig is given by A′=[α]I−1/summationdisplay r=1Ar={β}F([α]I−1)/α. (A9) This contribution is independent of wand represents a constant background term. Sincer≤[α]I+ 1, the only remaining contributions to the integral can come from A0, A[α]IandA[α]I+1. These terms depend on wand represent the atomic gratings. Let us first consider A0. Ifr= 0,b0= (−1 +w+{β}F)/α < 1 anda0= (−1 +w)/α < 0. It then follows from Eqs. (A8, A8a, A8b) thatA0=/braceleftbigg (w+{β}F−1)/α,forw≥(1− {β}F)≡¯w 0 for w≤¯w. (A10) We now turn our attention to A[α]IandA[α]I+1. It follows from Eq. (A3) that a[α]I∈[0,1]. Only the points b[α]I, a[α]I+1, b[α]I+1can lie to the right of the range [0,1], which occurs when w≥({α}F+ 1− {β}F)≡w1, w≥ {α}F≡w2, (A11) w≥({α}F− {β}F)≡w3, respectively. From Eqs. (A8, A8a, A8b), one finds that A[α]I, andA[α]I+1are given by A[α]=/braceleftbiggb[α]I−a[α]I={β}F/α w<w 1 1−a[α]I={α}F−w+1 αw>w 1,(A12) A[α]I+1=  0 w>w 2 1−a[α]I+1={α}F−w αw3<w<w 2 b[α]I+1−a[α]I+1={β}F/α w<w 3 (A12a) In order to sum A0,A[α]I, andA[α]I+1it is convenient to separate regions of αandβaccording to the relative values ofw1, w2, w3and ¯w. Since w3≤w2≤w1, (A13) w3≤¯w≤w1, (A13a) andw2={α}F≥0 one can distinguish four cases w3≤0≤¯w≤w2; [{β}F≥max({α}F,1− {α}F)], (A14) w3≤0≤w2≤¯w; [{α}F≤ {β}F≤1− {α}F], (A14a) 0≤w3≤¯w≤w2; [1− {α}F≤ {β}F≤ {α}F], (A14b) 0≤w3≤w2≤¯w; [{β}F≤min ({α}F,1− {α}F)]. (A14c) Consider, for example, the case (A14) for the range of w given by 0≤w≤¯w. (A15) 31For integer βthis corresponds to the entire range of al- lowedw, 0≤w≤1. From Eqs. (A10, A12, A12a) one findsA0= 0,A[α]I={β}F/α, andA[α]I+1= ({α}F−w)/α. As a result, one finds that A(w) = A0+A[α]I+A[α]I+1is given by A(w) = ({β}F+{α}F−w)/α. (A16) By combining Eqs. (A9, A16), one obtains h[β]I(w) = ({β}F[α]I+{α}F−w)/α. (A17) Even though Eq. (A17) have been derived for α≥1, one can verify that it holds for arbitrary α. Other values of wand other cases (A14a-A14c) can be considered in the same manner. As a result, one arrives at Eqs. (100, 101) of the text. REFERENCES Altschuler, S. and Frantz, L. M. (1973) US Patent No. 3,761,721. Baklanov, Ye. V., Dubetsky, B., Chebotayev, V. P. (1976) Appl. Phys. 9,171-173. Barger, R. L., Bergquist, J. C., English, T. C., Glaze, D. J. (1979) Appl. Phys. Lett. 34850-852. Batelaan, H., Bernet, S., Oberthaler, K., Rasel, E. M., Schmiedmayer, J., Zeilinger, A. (1996) ,in ”Atom Interferometry,” P. R. Berman (ed.) (Academic, Chestnut Hill, 1997). Bord´ e, Ch. J. (1989) Phys. Lett. A 14010-12. Carnal, O., Mlynek., J. (1991) Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2689-2692. Carnal, O., Turchette, Q. A., Kimble, H. J. (1995) Phys. Rev. A 513079-3087. Chapman, M. S., Ekstrom, C. R., Hammond, T. D., Schmiedmayer J., Tannian, B. E., Wehinger, S., Pritchard, D. E. (1995) Phys. Rev. A 51,R14-17. Chebotayev, V. P. (1978) Appl. Phys. 15, 219-222. Chebotayev, V. P., Dyuba, N. M., Skvortsov, M. N., Vasilenko, L. S. (1978 a) Appl. Phys. 15,319-322. Chebotayev, V. P., Dubetsky, B., Kazantsev, A. P., Yakovlev, V. P. (1985) J. Opt.Soc. Am. B 2,1791- 1798. Chebotayev, V. P. (1986) Simposium hold in the mem- ory of Yu. B. Rumer, Novosibirsk (unpublished). Clauser, J. F., Reinsch, M. W. (1992) Apll. Phys. B 54 380-395.Clauser, J. F., Li, S. (1994) Phys. Rev. A 49,R2213- 2216. Dubetsky, B. (1976) Kvantovaya Elektronika 3, 1258- 1265 [Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 6, 682-686 (1976)] Dubetsky, B., Semibalamut, V. M. (1978) .InSixth International conference on atomic physics. Ab- staracts, edited by E. Anderson, E. Kraulinya, R. Peterkop (Riga, USSR) ,p. 21. Dubetsky, B.,Semibalamut, V. M. (1982) Kvantovaya Elektronika 9, 1688-1691 [Sov. J. Quantum Elec- tron.12,1081-1083 (1982)]. Dubetsky, B., Chebotayev, V. P., Kazantsev, A. P., Yakovlev, V. P. (1984) Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. 39, 531-533 (1984) [JETP Lett. 39, 649 (1984)]. B. Dubetsky, P. R. Berman. (1994) Phys. Rev. A 50, 4057-4068. Ekstrom, C. R., Schmiedmayer, J., Chapman, M. S., Hammond, T. D., Pritchard, D. E. (1995) Phys Rev. A 51,3883-3888. Friedberg, R., Hartmann, S. R. (1993) Phys. Rev. A 48,1446-1472. Friedberg, R., Hartmann, S. R. (1993 a) Laser Physics 3, 526-534. Giltner, D. M., McGowan, R. W., Lee, S. A.(1995) Phys. Rev. Lett. 75,2638-2641. Hall, J. L., Borde, C. J., Uehara, K. (1976) Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 1339-1342. Janicke, U., Wilkens, M. (1994) J. Phys. II France 4, 1975-1980. Kapitza, P. L., Dirac, P. A. M. (1933) Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 29, 297-300. Kasevich, M., Chu, S. (1991) Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 181-184. Kazantsev, A. P., Surdutovich, G. I., Yakovlev, V. P. (1980) Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 31, 542-545 [ JETP Lett. 31,509-512 (1980)]. Keith, D. W., Ekstrom, C. R., Turchette, Q. A., D. E. Pritchard, D. E. (1991) Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2693-2696. Kol’chenko, A. P., Rautian S. G., Sokolovski ¨i, R. I. (1968).Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 55,1864-1873 [Sov. Phys. JETP 28,986-990 (1969)]. Kruse, U. E., Ramsey, N. F. (1951) J. Math. Phys., 30, 40-43. 32LeGou¨ et, J.-L., Berman, P. R. (1979) Phys. Rev. A 20, 1105-1115. Martin, P. J., Oldaker, B. J., Miklich, A. H., Pritchard, D. E. (1988) Phys. Rev. Lett. 60,515-518. Mossberg, T, Kachru, R., Whittaker, E., Hartmann, S. R. (1979) Phys. Rev. Lett. 43,851-855. Moskovitz, P. E., Gould, P.L., Atlas, S. R., Pritchard, D. E. (1983) Phys. Rev. Lett. 51,370-373. M¨ uller, J. H., Bettermann, D., Rieger, V., Ruschewitz, F., Sengstock, K., Sterr, U., Christ, M., Schif- fer, M., Scholz, A., Ertmer, W. (1995) In Atomic Physics 14, Editors Wineland D. J., Wieman, C. E., Smith, S. J., AIP Conference Proceedings (AIP Press, New York) 323, 240-257. Patorski, K. (1989) In E. Wolf, Progress in optics XXVII, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., pp 1- 108. Rasel, E. M., K. Oberthaler, K., Batelaan, H., Schmied- mayer, J., Zeilinger, A. (1995) Phys. Rev. Lett. 75,2633-2637. Riehle, F., Kisters, Th., Witte, A., and Helmcke, J. (1991) Phys. Rev. Lett. 67,177-180. Shimizu, F., Shimizu, K., Takuma, H. (1992) Phys. Rev. A 46,R17-20.Timp, G., Behringer, R. E., Tennant, D. M., Cunning- ham, J. E., Prentiss, Berggren, M. K. (1992) Phys. Rev. Lett. 69,1636-1639. Turchette, Q. A., Pritchard, D. E., Keith, D. W. (1992) J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 91601-1606. Winthrop, J. T., Worthington, C. R. (1965) J. Opt. Soc. Am.55,373-381. [1] The scattering of atoms by standing-wave fields, rather than MS, is a bit more subtle. For resonant standing wave fields, which can act as amplitude gratings, the situation is unchanged. On the other hand, off-resonant fields act as phase gratings for the atoms; as such, they produce no effect on classically moving particles. Strictly speaking, therefore, one must quantize the center-of-mass motion to calculate the scattering of the atoms by the fields. Never- theless, in a manner analogous to the normal photon echo, it is possible to assign phases to the atoms while they are freely evolving between the MS and the screen and still consider the motion as classical in these regions. 33

arXiv:physics/0005079v1 [physics.atom-ph] 29 May 2000Classical double ionization of atoms in strong fields Bruno Eckhardt1and Krzysztof Sacha1,2 1Fachbereich Physik, Philipps Universit¨ at Marburg, D-350 32 Marburg, Germany 2Instytut Fizyki im. Mariana Smoluchowskiego, Uniwersytet Jagiello´ nski, ul. Reymonta 4, PL-30-059 Krak´ ow, Poland (February 2, 2008) Recent high resolution measurements of the momenta of two el ectrons emitted from Argon atoms in a strong laser field show a strong preference for the outgoi ng electrons to have similar momenta and to be ejected in the same direction along the field. We disc uss the final stages of this process in a classical model in the spirit of Wanniers approach to dou ble ionization after electron impact. Starting from an intermediate state of high but negative ene rgy the field opens up a channel through which both electrons can escape. Near the threshold for this process Coulomb repulsion favors an escape with the electron momenta and positions symmetric wi th respect to the electric field axis. Classical trajectory simulations within this symmetry sub space account for most features of the observed momentum distribution. Double ionization of neutral atoms (in particular He, Ne and Ar) in the presence of strong fields has attracted considerable attention after it was noted that the ob- served yield is much higher than can be expected on the basis of an independent electron model [1,2]. It was pro- posed early on that correlations between the electrons should be responsible for this enhancement. A striking demonstration of such correlations is provided by recent high resolution experiments on the distribution of the ion-recoil momenta [3,4,6] and the electron momenta [5] which clearly show a preference for the symmetric escape of both electrons to the same side of the nucleus. This is very different from the process in the absence of a field (Wannier-ionization, [7,8]) where the dominant ioniza- tion path has both electrons escape symmetrically placed on opposite sides of the nucleus. In particular, while the Wannier mode minimizes the electron repulsion, a sym- metric escape to the same side has considerable residual energy in the repulsion between electrons. So why is this channel favoured? It is by now generally accepted that the ionization takes place in two steps: a high excitation of one elec- tron followed by the double ionization event [9–16]. The highly excited electron is accelerated by the field and driven back to the core where it collides with the other electron, and transfers enough energy and momentum so that both electrons can escape from the nucleus. It is this rescattering of the electron that enhances the en- ergy transfer and thus the ionization rate. But it also implies that during the ionization process the interaction between the electrons cannot be ignored. The amount of energy the excited electron can gain during half a period of the electric field has been esti- mated in [3]: for a field intensity of 2 .9·1014W/cm2the estimate gives a maximal energy transfer of about 60 eV. This is insufficient to ionize the second electron directly, but as the experiments show, double ionization is possible nevertheless. This implies that there must be a mecha- nism by which the electrons can draw additional energyfrom the field so that asymptotically, once the pulse has ceased, the total energy of the system is positive. The related problem of double ionization in collisions or single photon excitation was studied in a classic paper by Wannier [7,8]. He assumed that during the first stages a high energy complex of electrons close to the nucleus is formed from which then the ionized electrons escape. If the energy is close to threshold, they cannot afford to put energy into the mutual repulsion and the escape is with both electrons on opposite sides of the nucleus. More- over, he argued that their distance has to be the same, for any difference in position and energy would be am- plified, pushing the configuration towards single electron ionization. Essential elements of this discussion also apply to the present situation. At the end of the first step the rescat- tering of one electron to the core produces a highly ex- cited two electron complex. The estimates show [3] that the total energy in the system is insuffient to doubleion- ize immediately. However, if the electric field during the collision is non-zero, a saddle opens through which the electrons can escape. Because of their mutual repulsion the electron that gets to the saddle first has an advan- tage: it can cross the saddle while pushing the other back to the nucleus. Since energy is scarce near threshold this results in either single ionization or in another rescatter - ing event, but most likely not in double ionization. This suggests that the dominant path leading to double ioniza- tion has both electrons cross the saddle side by side. This singular process then acquires a finite probability when trajectories asymptotic to this configuration are taken into account. Therefore, we propose that near the threshold for dou- ble ionization the only path leading to double ionization has both electrons escape symmetric with respect to the field axis. With the field pointing along the x-axis and the electrons confined to the plane z= 0 their coordi- nates are ( x, y,0) and ( x,−y,0) in position and ( px, py,0) and (px,−py,0) in momenta. In this geometry the obser- 1vation that both electrons escape to the same side is built from the outset. As an aside we note that this symmetry plane also contains the Wannier orbit, for x= 0, as the symmetric escape perpendicular to the field axis. The classical Hamilton function for this geometry then is (in atomic units, with infinitely heavy nucleus and in dipole approximation) H(px, py, x, y, t ) =p2 x+p2 y+V(x, y, t) (1) with potential energy V(x, y, t) =−4/radicalbig x2+y2+1 2y+ 2F xf(t) cos(ωt+φ) (2) and the pulse shape f(t) = sin2(πt/T d) (3) where the duration of the pulse is taken to be four field cycles, Td= 8π/ω. The frequency is ω/2 = 0 .057a.u., and corresponds to the experimental situation [3–5]. The rescattering of the electrons leads to a highly excited complex of total energy ˜Ewhich every now and then is close to the symmetric configuration described by the Hamiltonian (1). Any configuration on this energy shell (for some fixed time t) as well as any phase φof the field is equally likely, and the experimental observations are averages over initial conditions and phases. As mentioned, for the weakest fields where double ion- ization is observed the rescattered electron does not bring in enough energy for double ionization. However, if the collision happens near a time where the field is strong, the electric field distorts the potential and opens a path for escape in down-field direction. This process can be discussed adiabatically for fixed external field since the motion of the electrons near the nucleus is much faster than the change in the field. The ionization can thus be discussed in the potential (2) with fixed field. Equipo- tential lines for the potential (2) at a maximum of the field for F= 0.137a.u., corresponding to an intensity of 6.6·1014W/cm2, are shown in Fig. 1. The saddle is lo- cated along the line x=rScosθandy=rSsinθwith θ=π/6 or 5 π/6 and at a distance r2 S=√ 3/Fmaxwhere Fmax= max t|F f(t) cos(ωt+φ)|. The energy of the saddle is VS=−6/radicalBig Fmax/√ 3. (4) For the extremal fields in a pulse of the above mentioned intensity this gives VS=−1.69a.u., so that within the adiabatic picture the saddle can be reached if the return- ing electron brings in at least 1 .22a.u.in energy. During a field cycle the saddle moves in from infinity along the line at θ=π/6, moves out again to infinity after half a period and then moves in and out again along the line θ= 5π/6 during the second half of the cycle. Ionization is most likely when the saddle is closest to te nucleus.A typical trajectory within the symmetric configura- tion is shown in Fig. 2. During the ramping of the field the electronic motion is little influenced by the electric field, but during the third half cycle of the field the sad- dle is close enough to the electron orbits and ionization takes place. Once on the other side of the saddle, the electrons rapidly gain energy. The saddle thus provides a kind of transition state [17,18] for the double ionization process: once the electrons cross it, they are accelerated by the field and pulled further away, making a return rather unlikely. Moreover, they can aquire the missing energy so that both electrons can escape even when the field vanishes. The field thus plays a double role in de- termining a threshold for this process: during the first stages of the rescattering process it provides the energy for the collision complex and during the final stages it opens the path for double escape. In the experiments it is not possible to monitor all details and intermediate stages of the process. Most in- formation is extracted from the distribution of final mo- menta pnof the nucleus and piof the electrons, where p1+p2≈ −pn[3–6]. Because of the symmetry assump- tion in the model the components perpendicular to the field vanish. The distribution of the parallel components can be calculated by averaging over all initial conditions of prescribed energy and all phases of the field. Classical scaling of the Hamiltonian (1) implies that the results do not depend on the initial energy ˜Eand field strength independently, but on the combination F/˜E2 only. The field strength Fis set by the intensity of the laser. The initial energy of the two-electron complex is determined by the field dependent efficieny of the sin- gle electron excitation step and thus not directly acces- sible, although it can be estimated as in [3]. We there- fore fix Fand vary initial energy. The results for fixed field strength F= 0.137a.u.and an initial energy of ˜E=−0.58a.u.are compared to the experimental dis- tribution in Fig. 3. The final distribution of momenta clearly shows the double hump structure indicating a preference for ionization parallel and antiparallel to the field. The maxima of the experimental distribution are at about p/bardbl=±1.5a.u., whereas the numerical ones within the symmetric subspace lie at about ±1a.u.. We take this close agreement as strong indication that double ioniza- tion can only occur in the neighborhood of the symmetric process discussed here. For lower energy, ˜E=−1.3a.u.the minimum at p/bardbl= 0 almost vanishes and only a single maximum shows up (Fig. 4a). This corresponds to the experimental situation of a weaker pulse which evidently transfers less energy to the rescattered electron [3]. Within the symmetric subspace, there are two reasons for this change: at this lower initial energy the electrons have little kinetic ener gy when crossing the barrier, so that the splitting should be expected to be small. Secondly, the electrons cross the barrier typically when the field is strongest, so that after the ionization there is still considerable smearing of the 2distribution due to the interaction with the remainder of the pulse. If the distribution is monitored immedi- ately after the crossing of the barrier the two preferred momenta parallel and anti-parallel to the field stand out clearly, as demonstrated in Fig. 4b. These numerical results in the reduced symmetry sub- space are in surprising agreement with the experimen- tal data. They show that the configuration with ro- tational symmetry around the field axis dominates the cross section. The interaction with the field shortly af- ter ionization is responsible for most of the smearing of the final distribution, additional contributions come from trajectories that are not symmetric. Actually, non- symmetric configurations are needed in order to obtain a non-vanishing cross section to begin with: the symmet- ric subspace is a set of measure zero in the phase space of the six degree of freedom system and acquires a finite overlap with initial conditions only due to non-symmetric initial conditions that are asymptotic to the symmetric subspace. The cross section for double ionization shows that this overlap is small [3–6]. The picture proposed here for multiphoton double ion- ization is very similar to that of Wannier for double ion- ization through electron impact. The main difference is that now the symmetry between the outgoing electrons is a rotation around the field axis whereas it is a point sym- metry with the nucleus in the center in Wanniers case. Finally, we would like to mention that besides the dif- ferent symmetry there is another difference to the Wan- nier double ionization without field: In the zero field ion- ization there is only a single trajectory so that there in leading order semiclassical approximation no quantum interferences can be expected [19]. The present prob- lem falls into the category of quantum chaotic scattering [20,21] where the classical ionization dynamics is chaotic and quantum interference effects between different paths cannot be ruled out. It will be interesting to pinpoint quantum interference effects in this system. We would like to thank Harald Giessen for stimulat- ing our interest in this problem and for discussions of the experiments. Financial support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and by KBN under project 2P302B00915 are gratefully acknowledged. [1] D.N. Fittinghof, P.R. Bolton, B. Chang, and K.C. Ku- lander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2642 (1992) [2] B. Walker, B. Sheehy, L.F. DiMauro, P. Agostini, K.J. Schafer, and K.C. Kulander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1227 (1994) [3] Th. Weber, M. Weckenbrock, A. Staudte, L. Spielberger, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, F. Afaneh, G. Urbasch, M. Vollmer, H. Giessen and R. D¨ orner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 443 (2000)[4] Th. Weber, M. Weckenbrock, A. Staudte, L. Spielberger, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, F. Afaneh, G. Urbasch, M. Vollmer, H. Giessen and R. D¨ orner, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 33, L1 (2000) [5] Th. Weber, H. Giessen, M. Weckenbrock, G. Urbasch, A. Staudte, L. Spielberger, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, M. Vollmer, and R. D¨ orner, Nature ???, ??? (2000) (in press) [6] R. Moshammer, B. Feuerstein, W. SChmitt, A. Dorn, C.D. Sch¨ oter, J. Ullrich, H. Rottke, C. Trump, M. Wittmann, G. Korn, K. Hoffmann and W. Sandner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 447 (2000) [7] G.H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 90, 817 (1953) [8] A. R. P. Rau , Phys. Rep. 110, 369, (1984) [9] P.B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993) [10] K.C. Kulander, J. Cooper, and K.J. Schafer, Phys. Rev. A51, 561 (1995) [11] B. Walker, B. Sheehy, K.C. Kulander, and L.F. DiMauro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5031 (1996) [12] A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 29, L197 (1996) [13] A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 32, L335 (1999) [14] B. Sheehy, R. Lafon, M. Widmer, B. Walker, L.F. Di- Mauro, P.A. Agostini, and K.C. Kulander, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3942 (1998) [15] A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. A 59, R1742 (1999) [16] A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. Lett. ??, ??? (2000) (in press) [17] E. P. Wigner, Z. Phys. Chemie B 19, 203 (1932); Trans. Faraday Soc. 3429, (1938) [18] E. Pollak, in Theory of Chemical Reactions , vol III, M. Baer, ed., (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1985, p. 123 [19] J.M. Rost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1998 (1994); Phys. Rep. 297, 271 (1999) [20] B. Eckhardt, Physica D 33, 89 (1988) [21] U. Smilansky. Semiclassical Quantization of Chaotic Billiards - A Scattering Approach. in Proc. of the Les Houches Summer School on Mesoscopic Quantum Physics . Elsevier Science Publ. (1995) Ed. E. Akkermans, G. Montambaux and J. L. Pichard. 3xy 0246 -5 0 5 FIG. 1. Adiabatic potential V(x,y, t) for fixed time tin the symmetric subspace. The saddle moves along the dashed line when the electric field points in the positive x-direction and along a second obtained by reflection on x= 0 during the other half of the field cycle. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 t/(2π/ω)−5.0−2.50.02.5E (a.u.)0.05.010.015.020.0r (a.u.)(a) (b) FIG. 2. A typical trajectory in the symmetric subspace with ˜E=−1.3a.u.(a) distance of the electrons to the nu- cleus. The dashed line indicates the distance of the saddle. Note that before the double ionization occurs the effect of th e field on the electrons is minimal, supporting the adiabatic assumption. (b) energy of the electrons. Note that the ini- tial state has negative total energy and cannot lead to doubl e ionization. The energy increases once the electrons have es - caped from the nucleus far enough so that acceleration by the electric field dominates.−6 −3 0 3 p|| (a.u.)0.00.10.20.3 −6 −3 0 3 6 2 px (a.u.)(b) (a) FIG. 3. Final distribution of ion momenta parallel to the field for F= 0.136a.u.: (a) experimental distribution from [3] (b) distribution from symmetric subspace with initial e n- ergy ˜E=−0.58a.u.. The classical distribution is based on an ensemble of 2 ·105trajectories. −10 −5 0 5 2 px (a.u.)0.000.050.100.150.20 −10 −5 0 5 10(a) (b) FIG. 4. Final distribution of momenta parallel to the field forF= 0.136a.u.and initial energy ˜E=−1.3a.u.. (a) at the end of the pulse; (b) at the first zero of the field after cross- ing the saddle. This figure demonstrates the smearing of the distribution due to the final post ionization interaction wi th the electric field. It is based on 50.000 classical trajector ies. 4

arXiv:physics/0005080v1 [physics.bio-ph] 30 May 2000Damage of cellular material under simultaneous applicatio n of pressure and pulsed electric field M. I. Bazhala,b, N. I. Lebovkaa,c, E. Vorobieva∗ aD´ epartement de G´ enie Chimique, Universit´ e de Technolog ie de Compi` egne, Centre de Recherche de Royallieu, B.P. 20529-60205 Compi` egne Cedex, France bUkrainian State University of Food Technologies, 68, Volod ymyrska str., Kyiv, 252033, Ukraine cInstitute of Biocolloidal Chemistry named after F.D. Ovcha renko, NAS of Ukraine, 42, blvr.Vernadskogo, Kyiv, 252142, Ukraine Influence of pulsed electric field (PEF) simultaneous to pres sure treatment on moisture expression from fine-cut cellular raw material has been inve stigated. Dependencies of specific conductivity σ, liquid yield Y, instantaneous flow rate vand qualitative juice characteristics at different modes of PEF treatment are discussed. Three main consolidation phases were observed in a case of mechanical expression. A unified approa ch is proposed for liquid yield data analysis allowing to reduce the data scattering caused by differences in the quality of samples. Simultaneous application of pressure and PEF tr eatment allowed to reveal a passive form of electrical damage. Pressure provokes the da mage of defected cells, enhances diffusion migration of moisture in porous cellular material and depresses the cell resealing processes. PEF application at a moment when a sample specific electrical conductivity reaches minimum and pressure achieves its constant value se emed to be the most optimal. Notation d mean cell’s dimension, µm D diffusion coefficient, m2s−1 E electric field strength, kV cm−1 k area normalizing coefficient M1first Moment, s N number of pulses P pressure, bar S area under the expression curve Y(t), % s ti pulse duration, µs tmax maximal time of pressing, s tp time of PEF treatment application, s tvmax time, where maximum of instantaneous flow rate is observed, s ∆t pulse repetition time, ms T temperature, K v =dY/dt instantaneous flow rate, % s−1 U external voltage, V W moisture content, % YIfirst normalized form of liquid yield YIIsecond normalized form of liquid yield Y∗intensification degree of PEF treatment Greek letters σ conductivity, S m−1 τ characteristic time of expression, s τ∗coefficient of PEF enhanced durability τD ∼d2/6Dtime constant of diffusion process, s ∗Corresponding author, E-mail:Eugene.Vorobiev@utc.fr 1Subscripts E with PEF treatment E= 0 without PEF treatment r reduced to the maximal value ∞ in the limit of infinite time Abbreviations PEF pulsed electric field SEM scanning electron microscopy I. INTRODUCTION Mechanical expression (hydraulic pressing) is widely used in the processes of solid-liquid separation for extraction of fruit juices and vegetable oils, dewatering of fibrous mat erials, etc. (Schwartzberg, 1983). Efficiency of this proces s can be increased by raw material plasmolysis, cellular dama ge or permeabilization prior to its expression. Different methods are traditionally used to increase the degree of raw material plasmolysis: heating, osmotic drying or freezing dehydration, alkaline breakage, enzymatic treatment, etc . (Rao & Lund, 1986; Aguilera & Stanley, 1999; Tsuruta, Ishimoto & Masuoka, 1998; Ponant, Foissac & Esnault, 1988; J ones, 1988; Barbosa-C´ anovas & Vega-Mercado, 1996). Earlier on, the method of electric field treatment (both d.c. and a.c.) was also proposed for cellular material plasmolysis (known as electro-plasmolysis). The methods o f electro-plasmolysis were shown to be good for juice yield intensification and for improving the product quality in jui ce production (Scheglov, Koval, Fuser, Zargarian, Srimbov , Belik et al., 1988; McLellan, Kime & Lind, 1991, Bazhal & Voro biev, 2000), processing of vegetable and plant raw materials (Papchenko, Bologa, Berzoi, 1988; Grishko, Kozi n, Chebanu, 1991), food stuffs processing (Miyahara, 1985), winemaking (Kalmykova, 1993), and sugar production (Gulyi , Lebovka, Mank, Kupchik, Bazhal, Matvienko et al., 1994; Jemai, 1997). But all these electric field application s are usually restricted by the high and uncontrolled increa se in cellular tissue temperature and product quality deterio ration because of electrode material electrolytic reactio ns, etc. Recently, a variety of new high and moderate pulsed electric field (PEF) applications were successfully demonstrated for liquid and solid foods (Barbosa-C´ anovas, Pothakamuri , Palou & Swanson, 1998; Wouters & Smelt, 1997; Knorr, Geulen, Grahl & Sitzmann, 1994; Knorr & Angersbach, 1998, Ba rsotti & Cheftel, 1998). The PEF application provides a possibility of fine regulation of electric power i nput and may result in effective permeabilization of cellula r membranes (Zimmermann, 1975; Chang et al., 1992; Weaver & Ch izmadzhev, 1996) without significant temperature elevation (Barbosa-C´ anovas et al., 1998). One of emerging and promising method is the combined PEF and p ressure application, which demonstrates signif- icant yield intensification for juice extracted from apples and beets and clarification of the extracted juice (Vorobiev , Bazhal & Lebovka, 2000; Gulyi et al., 1994). But the major pro blem arising from simultaneous application of me- chanical expression and PEF treatment is the choice of optim al modes of treatment. The mechanism of solid/liquid expression from cellular materials is rather complex and ma y include many different phases of consolidation process (Lanoiselle, Vorobiev, Bouvier & Piar, 1996). The electric breakdown of a cellular system can influence consolidation phases and change drastically the expression curves. Unfor tunately, up to now there are no accepted mechanism of electric breakdown in the cellular systems and reliable c riteria for choosing optimal parameters of electric field treatment (Lebovka et al., 1996, Lebovka, Bazhal & Vorobiev , 2000). Another problem is the poor reproducibility of the experimental data, which is typical for objects of biolo gical origin. The properties of cellular materials influence significantl y the the electrotreatment efficiency. The electrometry can be used for characterization of changes in tissue proper ties under the influence of external factors (electric field, pressure). This is a simple method, as far as the electrical c onductivity, σ, reflects a degree of a water saturated tissue permeability (Sahimi, 1995). But the general dependence be tween the structure of a cellular material and σmay be rather complex, because the conductivity of a biological ti ssue may be influenced by a number of processes, such as resealing of membranes in cells (Heinz, Angersbach & Knorr, 1999), diffusional redistribution of moisture inside the samples, etc. The objective of this study is the optimization of moisture e xpression from biological raw materials under simulta- neous pressing and PEF treatment. The liquid expression from fine-cut cellular tissue after PE F application for different modes and durations of precompression has been investigated. Apple was used as the example of cellular material. The useful method of data treatment, which allows to reduce d ata scattering caused by differences in quality of the samples is described. Discussion of the consolidation kine tics before and after PEF treatment is also given. 2II. PRELIMINARY REMARKS The reasons for the simultaneous application of mechanical expression and PEF treatment are as follows. The excessive quantity of extraparticle liquid and absence of c ontacts between solid particles increases electrical ener gy losses. So the effectiveness of the PEF treatment is restrict ed by the uniform and tight packing of raw material between electrodes and previous removing of extraparticle air and excessive liquid (from cells destroyed by cutting). The method of raw material compact formation is its pre-cons olidation. Moreover, effectiveness of the PEF treatment with respect to the water-saturated cellular materials is r estricted by the low values of moisture content, W. The PEF treatment is ineffective for a water-saturated system (whic h is the case for the fine-cut apple raw material) because of electric breakage and uncontrolled increase of current fl ow through the system. The initial steps of consolidation remove an excess liquid from the extracellular volume. Ther efore, we can expect increase of the PEF treatment efficiency after pre-consolidation of the raw material. III. MATERIALS AND METHODS A. Preparation of apple slices Freshly harvested apples of Golden Delicious variety were s elected for investigation and stored at 4◦C until required. The moisture content of apples Wwas within 80-85%. The fine-cut apple pieces (3-5 mm diameter ) were prepared from an apple pap using rasp. B. Experimental setup and instrumentations Figure 1 is a schematic representation of the experimental s et-up. All experiments were carried out using laboratory filter-press cell equipped with an electrical treatment sys tem. The polypropylene frame had a cylindrical cavity compartment (20 mm thick, 56 mm in diameter). The cavity comp artment of frame was initially filled up with apple slices and then was tightly closed from both sides by the stee l plates. One of the plates, covered by a filter cloth, was used as a stationary electrode. The other plate was attached with an elastic rubber diaphragm. A mobile wire gauze electrode was installed between the diaphragm and the layer of apple slices. Pressure was applied to the layer of apple slices through the elastic diaphragm using the hydraulic pr essure controller GDS ’Standard’ (GDS Instruments Ltd, UK) with water as a pressure fluid. The pressure controller pr ovided a constant pressure from 1 to 30 bars. The yield of liquid was controlled by balance PT610 (Sartorius AG, Ger many). A high voltage pulse generator, 1500V-15A (Service Electro nique UTC, France) provided the monopolar pulses of rectangular shape and allowed pulse duration tivaried within the interval of 10 −1000µs (to precision ±2µs), pulse repetition time ∆ twithin the interval of 1 −100 ms (to precision of ±0.1 ms) and number of pulses nwithin the interval of 1 −100000. The conductivities were measured by contacting ele ctrode method with an LCR Meter HP 4284A (Hewlett Packard, 38 mm guarded/guard Electrode-A HP 16451B) for thin apple slice samples at the frequency of 100 Hz and with Conductimetre HI8820N (Hanna Instruments , Portugal) for the apple juice samples at a frequency of 1000 Hz (these frequencies were selected as optimal in ord er to remove the influence of polarising effect on electrodes and inside the samples). Pulse protocols and all the output d ata (current, voltage, impedance, pressure, juice yield and temperature) were controlled using a data logger and spe cial software HPVEE v.4.01 (Hewlett-Packard) adapted by Service Electronique UTC, France). High resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using the instrument XL30 ESEM-FEG (Philips, V=15 kV, P=3.5 Torr). The ”WET” chamber mode allow ing observation of hydrated apple specimens in their natural state was applied. The optical absorbance of an expressed liquid was measured w ith Photocolorimeter CO75 (WPA Ltd, UK) at the wavelength 520 nm. The characteristic absorption spect ra were determined with respect to distilled water. Transmittance of an expressed liquid was calculated as a rat io of filtered and nonfiltered liquid absorptions. The liquid was filtrated using a Whatman 2V filter paper. C. Methods All experiments were done using electric field voltages Ufrom 200 to 1500 V, pulse duration ti= 100 s, pulse repetition time ∆ t= 10 ms, number of pulses N= 50, constant pressure P= 3 bars and total time of mechanical 3expression tup to 104s. Pressure value of 3 bars was accepted as the most efficient fo r exhibition of the effect of simultaneous pressing and PEF treatment (Vorobiev et al., 2 000). The experiments were repeated, at least, five times. IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Phases of consolidation Figure 2 presents typical experimental curves of liquid yie ldYr, instantaneous flow rate vr, pressure Prand specific electrical conductivity σrvs. time t. For convenience of presentation, here all properties are r educed to their maximal values, e.g., Yr=Y/Y max, etc., and flow rate is determined as v=dY/dt . Initially we observe a rather rapid increase of liquid yield Y, and decrease of electrical conductivity, σ. This behaviour corresponds to the layer pre-compaction (at a con stant velocity of elastic diaphragm displacement) and expulsion of extraparticle air-liquid mixture. The maximu m of instantaneous flow rate vis observed approximately att=tvmax= 50−60 s. In the absence of PEF treatment ( U= 0, or E= 0 ) the curve of σ(t) temporarily stabilises in time interval 300 < t < 1000 s and by this moment the pressure Preaches its maximal value of 3 bars. This behaviour correspond to the end of pre-compaction period. T hen, at t >1000, the σ(t) curve ( E= 0) slightly rises, which can be explained by mechanical rupture of residual cel ls, by the material deterioration and by the effects of the biological activity of microorganisms. Typical SEM micrographs of apple tissue structure before an d after pressing are presented in Figs. 3(a) and (b), respectively. The mean size of undamaged cells is of order 10 0−200µm. We see, that after pressing some of the cells are destroyed, but there exist also intact cells. So, for a gi ven mode of treatment ( P= 3 bars, t= 600 s) the cellular structure is not completely disrupted after pressing and th ere exists some isolated cells, which remain intact during pressing period. These cells can be damaged or partially per meabilized by another methods, for example, by PEF, thermal or another mode of treatment. In analysing the results presented in Figs. 2, 3(a,b) we can d iscern the following phases of press-cake layer consoli- dation process: •Phase I. Initial compaction of press-cake and expulsion of a ir-liquid mixture, or pre-consolidation period (0 < t/lessorapproxeql2tvmax∼=100−120). During this phase the velocity of elastic diaphragm di splacement is constant and a maximum of liquid flow rate is observed. •Phase II. Mechanical rupture of cells and expulsion of liqui d from ruptured cells (100 −120/lessorapproxeqlt/lessorapproxeql300−400). The decrease of both liquid flow rate and velocity of elastic d iaphragm displacement and acceleration of the pressure increase are observed. •Phase III. Final consolidation of press-cake at constant pr essure, packing of press-cake and retardation of liquid flow rate (100 −120/lessorapproxeqlt). The liquid flowing from intracellular, extracellular and extraparticle volumes is expressed from the press-cake. At the beginning of this ph ase a minimum value of the specific electrical conductivity is observed. Moisture occupies all channels a nd so the press-cake is said to be in an impregnated state. These phases are shown schematically at the top of Fig. 2. B. Methods of data analysis for combined pressing and PEF tre atment Significant changes in kinetics of moisture expression and p ress-cake consolidation can be observed after PEF treatment. Figure 4(a) presents some examples of experimen tal curves of liquid yield Y(%) versus time t. It can be seen that Y(t) curves rise significantly after PEF application (applied i n this case at t= 600 s ) as the result of damage or partial permeabilization of intact cells and subs equent expression of liquid. But here, the main problem is in poor reproducibility of the e xperimental Y(t) data. The measured curves of Y(t) can deviate substantially because of differences in initial humidity of samples. This difficulty can be overcome by consideration of the normalized or reduced liquid yield. Th is normalization procedure was executed in two steps. We began with the first normalized form of liquid yield defined as (see Fig. 4(b)): YI E=YE(t)/YE(tmax), (1) 4where tmaxis the maximal time of pressing (here we use the value tmax= 5400 s), YEvalues correspond to the values ofYat different electric field strengths E. We assume that all liquid yield curves should be equal in the t ime range of t < t pfor identical conditions of pressing. For experiments with PEF application ( E/negationslash= 0), we take the curve YI E=0(t) forE= 0 as a reference. Then we calculate the area under this curve for the time period t < t pand renormalize all the curves YI E(t) so as to obtain the same values of SE=tp/integraldisplay 0YI E(t)dt, (2) for all curves. Normalization coefficient is given by kE=SE=0/SE. (3) The second normalized form of liquid yield curve is defined as follows (see Fig. 4(c)): YII E(t) =kE·YI E(t). (4) The degree of intensification caused by PEF treatment, Y∗can be determined as the following ratio of the second normalized forms for pressing with and without PEF treatmen t: Y∗=YII E(tmax)/YII E=0(tmax). (5) Here the values of YII E,E=0(tmax) were determined in the point of the maximal time of pressing t=tmax. Another interesting property of the expressing is the mean c haracteristic time, which characterizes durability of the process. The theory developed for mechanical expressio n of cellular materials (Lanoiselle et al., 1996) describes expression process with the set of characteristic times for the different expression phases. These are very valuable characteristics of the expression processes but, in practi ce, it is very difficult to find them proceeding from the expression curves. The main problem here is that we can never determine the exact value of limiting expression quantity Y∞att→ ∞.For vegetable stuff we are faced with the problem of high enzym atic destruction at continuous expression. So we always stop the expression process at rath er long, but finite time (in our case we choose tmax= 5400 s) and the obtained values of Y(tmax) are of course less then the actual values of Y∞. More general approach implies evaluation of the first Moment of the function F(t) =Y(tmax)−Y(t): M1=tmax/integraltext 0F(t)tdt tmax/integraltext 0F(t)dt(6) It is easy to show, that for the simple exponential function F(t) = exp( −t/τ) and tmax→ ∞ the first Moment is equal to the characteristic time, M1=τ.For the finite but large values of tmax,we have M1≈τ(1−(tmax/τ)2 2etmax /τ), and attmax/τ= 5 the first Moment equals to M1≈0.92τ. So, in our case the value of M1may serve for approximate estimation of the effective characteristic time constant of the whole expression process. It is useful to use this approach for crude estimation of char acteristic time or durability of expression process after PEF intervention. In such a case we can treat M1as a mean characteristic time of liquid expulsion processes reflecting the summarized effect of all the mechanisms in a system. We can define the coefficient of PEF-enhanced durability as τ∗=M1 E/M1 E=0. (7) This coefficient shows the degree of the durability increase a fter the PEF treatment. C. Influence of field strength Eand time tpof PEF treatment 1. Liquid yield kinetics Figure 5 presents the curves of excess normalized liquid yie ld ∆Y=YII E−YII E=0versus time tat different times of PEF application, tp, and different values of electric field strength, E. We have applied PEF treatment in different characteristic moments: 5•tp= 0 s (before pressing); •tp= 20 s (initial phase of pressing); •tp= 120 s (second consolidation phase and specific conductivit y of a tissue is low); •tp= 330 s (press-cake pressure is achieved a constant value); •tp= 600 s and tp= 5400 s (final consolidation phase). The range of voltage values used corresponds to conditions o f steady PEF-application regime without any disruption of electrical treatment caused by overflow of acceptable max imal current value. For the given pulses protocol, the steady electrical treatment regime was observed for the vol tages not exceeding the following maximal values: Umax= 600 V for tp= 0 s, Umax= 1000 V for tp= 600 s, and Umax= 1500 V for tp= 5400 s. As can be seen from Fig. 5 the form of the liquid yield YII Ecurves in the time interval of t <300 s practically does not depend on the time of PEF input tpand the electric field strength values E(that corresponds to small values of deviations YII E/negationslash=0−YII E=0). Only at longer time intervals t >300 s in the phase III of consolidation, we can observe a behaviour reflecting the mode of PEF treatment. At short times of PEF treatment, tp/lessorsimilar100−200 s, the excess liquid yield increases rapidly with Eincrease as compared with untreated sample (see Fig. 5(a-c)). But ine ffectiveness of PEF treatment at short tpis less in comparison with the cases of later PEF application. It can be explained by the influence of excess quantities of air and extraparticle liquid in the cake pores. The sample is hig hly water-saturated at earlier period of pre-consolidatio n and PEF application during this period may cause dielectric breakage and uncontrolled increase of current flow through the system. At such conditions, the intensification degree o f PEF treatment Y∗is rather low (see black square for tp= 0 in Fig. 6(a)). When we apply the PEF treatment later on, for example, at the b eginning of the phase III of consolidation, at t∼300−400 s a liquid excess yield seems to be less dependent on E(Fig. 5(d)). Pressure achieves its constant value at this time and most of cells that could be destroyed me chanically at a given pressure (3 bars in our experi- ments) are already disrupted and most of liquid is evacuated from these cells. The residual isolated intact cells are connected with electrodes through the network of channels c ontaining conductive moisture. At such conditions, the transmembrane potential on intact cells should be high enou gh, even at low values of E, and, therefore, the effective electropermeabilization of cell can be attained even at min imal values of electric field intensity ( E= 170 V cm−1in our experiments). As we can see from comparison of typical micrographs of apple tissue structure received for pressing with and without electrical treatment (Figs. 3(b) and (c)), PEF appl ication at t= 330 s ( E= 500 V cm−1) causes almost complete destruction of the material. The similar pictures are observed in the wide interval of E∼250−500 V cm−1 and micrographs allow us to identify only certain quantity o f single isolated intact cells. Dependencies of the coefficient of PEF enhanced durability τ∗versus electric field strength, E(Fig. 6(b)) substan- tiate conclusions set forth above. We see that the value of τ∗depends considerably on the electric field strength E only at small time of PEF input ( tp<100−200 s). The best liquid excess yield as compared with untreat ed sample may be obtained at the lowest applied field Ewhen the PEF is applied at an instant when the pressure in the s ystem reaches a constant value ( tp= 300 −400 s). 2. Specific conductivity σ, flow rate vand pressure Pkinetics Figure 7 presents the experimental curves of (a) a specific el ectrical conductivity, σ, and (b) instantaneous flow rate,v, versus time tfor the compressed layer of apple slices. The PEF treatment w as applied at t=tp= 120 s at different external field strengths, E. As can be seen from Fig. 7(a), the σ(t) values begin to rise abruptly after PEF treatment, and this behaviour becomes more pronounced with increasing E. Such rise of σ(t) values corresponds to the combined effect of mechanical rupture of cells and their e lectrical permeabilization. We present schematically the model of PEF treatment with and without pressing in Fig. 8. In the absence of mechanical pressure the effect of the hidden (or passive) ele ctrical breakdown can be rather important. The electrical conductivity of the whole system depends not only on the dest ruction degree of individual cells, but also on the character of their connectivity and the presence of continu ously conducting channels. At first, after PEF treatment the real degree of electrical br eakdown is hidden and does not affect the conductivity of the whole system. PEF treatment permeabilizates cell mem branes and intensifies diffusion processes. The time of electric conductivity build-up in a cellular material afte r PEF treatment can be estimated from the time constant of diffusion processes: τD∼d2/6D≈1 s, where d≈100 is a mean cell dimension, and D≈10−9m2s−1is a diffusion 6coefficient of an endocellular fluid. In general, this effect ca n exhibit a wide distribution of time constants τDbecause of differences in cell dimensions, diffusivity of intracellu lar solutions, degree of cell permeabilization, etc. Moreo ver, it can be masked by another related phenomena of resealing pr ocess. Heinz et al. (1999) observed that the insulating properties of the cell membranes can be recovered within a fe w seconds after the small power PEF treatment and it results in decreasing of a cellular system conductivity. Simultaneous effect of pressing and PEF treatment( P/negationslash= 0 and E/negationslash= 0) can cause the primary changes. First of all, mechanical and electrical stresses can be coupled to ca use membrane breakdown in cells (Akinlaja & Frederick, 1998). Then, the external pressure enhances flowing of the flu id from destroyed cells to extracellular and extraparticle channels. All these decrease the retardation time of electr ic conductivity build-up after PEF treatment. Under simultaneous PEF treatment and material compression we can also eliminate or diminish the effect of a hidden electric breakdown and to depress the cells resealing proce sses. So, in a general case, we should observe in final state σP/negationslash=0> σP=0. This conclusion is confirmed by the data on σ(t) kinetics at P= 0 presented in Fig. 7(a) by the dashed line. In this experiment we have dropped the pressure after P EF treatment. This results in considerable decrease of σ(t) values as compared with the curve obtained at P/negationslash= 0 (Fig. 8). A liquid flow rate valso depends upon the degree of cellular system destruction as a result of PEF treatment. But the behaviour of v(t) after PEF application does not change drastically (Fig. 7( b)). We can explain such behaviour by the fact of substantial decrease and termination of liqui d expulsion from the press-cake by that time. The most pronounced peak is observed only at the highest electric fiel d strength ( E= 400 V cm−1, Fig. 7(b)), and behaviour of the v(t) curve reveals only increase of its long time tails with incr ease of E. Figure 9 presents the experimental curves of (a) reduced pre ssure values P∗=P/P maxand (b) pressure difference P0−PEversus time tfor different durations of pre-compression stage before the PEF application. It can be seen that PEF treatment diminishes tissue rigidity which corres ponds to the decrease of an effective pressure in a system. Electrical treatment during the pressing period up to 330 s d elays pressure increase and accelerates the liquid yield. PEF application ( tp>330 s) can decrease steady-state pressure abruptly and init iate a rise of a liquid flow rate. The peaks of pressure decrease become sharper with pre-comp ression time increase. It corresponds to the more rapid destruction of cellular material pre-compressed during a l onger time. But then, at the final stage, the mechanical properties of a press-cake reflate and pressure increases ag ain up to the maximal level. D. Optical properties of expressed liquid The expressed liquid (apple juice) absorption (or colorati on) and transmittance change in the course of a simple pressing process, due to filtration properties of the cellul ar material in the course of time. In the final phase of consolidation (phase III, see Fig. 2), the liquid coloratio n reduces considerable as compared with coloration of an initial portion of moisture. As we have demonstrated before (Vorobiev, Bazhal & Lebovka, 2000), the simultaneous pressing and electric field treatment result in considerabl e reduction of coloration of those differential portions of l iquid which were obtained after PEF application. Studying the tem poral dependencies of optical properties in differential liquid for different modes of pressing and PEF application is per se of great interest. Here we will discuss only the optical properties of the cumul ative expressed liquid, which is obtained as a result of combined pressing and PEF treatment at the final stage of the p rocess. Figure 10 presents dependencies of absorption and transmittance versus electric strength Efor extracted liquid at different values of tp. On the one hand, the PEF treatment decreases the liquid coloration, as can be seen fr om absorption curves in Fig.10. This is a positive factor of PEF treatment. We can explain this phenomena by improvement of the tissue filtration properties during pressing. Moreover, filtration properties of the PEF treated press-ca ke also get improved with tpincrease because of increase of the pressed tissue consolidation. On the other hand, transm ittance of expressed liquid reduces with tpdecrease and increase of E. This is an undesirable phenomena. It can be explained by the influence of electrical treatment on the press-cake filtration properties. It is known that PEF appli cation causes many defects of the tissue. Application of the PEF treatment increases yield of a liquid with high conte nts of suspended particles. That’s why it is so important to choose a proper instant for PE F application allowing to obtain the cumulative liquid with low coloration and high transmittance. The PEF a pplication at a moment when pressure in the system achieves a constant value is consistent with requirement of the best quality of a juice. V. CONCLUSION Investigations of the moisture expression from fine-cut app le raw material under simultaneous mechanical expression and PEF treatment were done. All experiments were performed using both laboratory filter-press cell and high voltage 7pulse generator which provided monopolar pulses of rectang ular shape. The PEF treatment was applied to materials that were expressed at time t=tp. Then the yield of liquid was analysed in comparison with tha t of untreated material. The experimental results were obtained for elect ric field strength Evarying from 200 to 1500 V cm−1, pulse duration ti= 100 s, pulse repetition time ∆ t= 10 ms, number of pulses N= 50, constant pressure P= 3 bars and maximal time of mechanical expression tmax= 5.4×103−104s. The summary of results is as follows: (1) The data obtained allows us to conclude that all kinetics curves ( σ(t),Y(t),v(t) and P(t)) clearly reflect three main consolidation phases in cellular material. (2) The combination of pressing and PEF treatment gives the m ost optimum results and permits to enhance significantly the liquid yield in comparison with samples un treated by PEF. The PEF treatment application permits to intensify pressing process whenever the PEF is applied. B ut best liquid excess yield results at lowest value of applie d fieldEmay be obtained when PEF is applied after some pre-compressi on period. Such pressure pretreatment before PEF application is necessary for structuring uniformity of the press-cake, removing excess moisture and decreasing the electrical conductivity of cellular material. In our st udy, the pre-compression period duration of 300 −400 s was optimal and for which the pressure in the system reaches a con stant value. The PEF application in this moment of time results in the best quality of the expressed liquid (a pple juice), which is confirmed by its coloration and transmittance. (3) The simultaneous pressure and PEF treatment applicatio n reveals the passive form of the electrical damage. Electrical damage under a low field without pressure applica tion develops very slow. The pressure provokes damage of defected cells, enhances diffusion migration of moisture and depresses cells resealing processes. (4) The proposed unified approach for liquid yield data analy sis allows to reduce the data scattering caused by the differences in the quality of samples. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the “Pole Regional Genie des P rocedes“ (Picardie, France) and the Society CHOQUENET for providing the financial support. Authors also thank Dr. N. S. Pivovarova and Dr. A. B. Jemai for help with the preparation of the manuscript. 8REFERENCES Aguilera, J.M., & Stanley, D.W. (1999). Microstructural principles of food processing and enginee ring. Gaithers- burg: Aspen Publishers. Akinlaja J., & Frederick, S. (1998). The Breakdown of Cell Me mbranes by Electrical and Mechanical Stress. Biophysical Journal, 75 (1), 247-254. Barbosa-C´ anovas, G.V., & Vega-Mercado, H. (1996). Dehydration of Foods (pp. 289-320). New York: Chapman & Hall. Barbosa-C´ anovas, G.V., Pothakamury, U.R., Palou, E., & Sw anson, B.G. (1998). Nonthermal Preservation of Foods (pp. 53-72). New York: Marcel Dekker. Barsotti, L., & Cheftel, J.C. (1998). Traitement des alimen ts par champs electriques pulses. Science des Aliments, 18(6), 584-601. Bazhal, M.I., & Vorobiev, E.I. (2000). Electric treatment o f apple slices for intensifying juice pressing. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (in press). Chang, D.C., B.M. Chassy, J.A. Saunders, & Sowers, A.E., Eds . (1992). Guide to electroporation and electrofusion . San Diego: Academic Press. Grishko, A.A., Kozin, V.M., & Chebanu, V.G. (1991). Electroplasmolyzer for processing plant raw material , US Patent no. 4723483. Gulyi, I.S., Lebovka, N.I., Mank, V.V., Kupchik, M.P., Bazh al, M.I., Matvienko, A.B., & Papchenko, A.Y. (1994). Scientific and practical principles of electrical treatmen t of food products and materials . Kiev: UkrINTEI (in Russian). Heinz, V., Angersbach, A., & Knorr, D. (1999). High electric field pulses and membrane permeabilization. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Emerging Food Sci ence and Technology , Tampere, Finland, 22-24 November 1999, 34. Jemai, A.B. (1997). Contribution a l’etude de l’effet d’un traitement electriqu e sur les cossettes de betterave a sucre. Incidence sur le procede d’extraction . Th` ese de Doctorat, Universit´ e de Technologie de Compi` e gne, Compi` egne, France. Jones, G.C. (1988), Cossette pretreatment and pressing, International Sugar Journal, 90 (1077), 157-167. Kalmykova, I.S. (1993). Application of electroplasmolysis for intensification of p henols extracting from the grapes in the technologies of red table wines and natural juice . PhD Thesis, Odessa Technological Institute of Food Indust ry, Odessa, Ukraine (in Russian). Knorr, D., & Angersbach, A. (1998). Impact of high intensity electric field pulses on plant membrane permeabi- lization. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 9 , 185-191. Knorr, D., Geulen, M., Grahl, T., & Sitzmann, W. (1994). Food application of high electric field pulses. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 5 , 71-75. Lanoiselle, J.L., Vorobiev, E.I., Bouvier, J.M. & Piar G. (1 996). Modeling of Solid/Liquid Expression for Cellular Materials, AIChE Journal, 42 , 2057-2068. Lebovka, N.I., Mank, V.V., Bazhal, M.I., Kupchik, M.P. & Gul yi, I.S. (1996). Cascade model of thermal electrical breakdown of inhomogeneous systems. Surface Engineering and Applied Electrochemistry, 1 , 29-33. Lebovka, N.I., Bazhal, M.I. & Vorobiev E. (2000). Simulatio n and experimental investigation of food material breakage using pulsed electric field treatment. Journal of Food Engineering, 44 , 213-223. McLellan, M.R., Kime, R.L., & Lind, L.R. (1991). Electropla smolysis and other treatments to improve apple juice yield. Journal of Science Food Agriculture, 57 , 303-306. Miyahara, K. (1985). Methods and apparatus for producing electrically processe d food stuffs , US Patent no. 4522834. Papchenko, A.Y., Bologa, M.K. & Berzoi, S.E. (1988). Apparatus for processing vegetable raw material , US Patent no. 4787303. Ponant, J., Foissac, S. & Esnault, A. (1988). The alkaline ex traction of sugar beet. Zuckerindustrie, 113 (8), 665-676. Rao, M.A., & Lund, D.B. (1986). Kinetics of thermal softenin g of food - a review. J. of Food Proc. and Pres., 10 , 311-329. Sahimi, M. (1995). Flow and transport in porous media and fractured rock . Weinheim: VCH. Scheglov, Ju.A., Koval, N.P., Fuser, L.A., Zargarian, S.Y. , Srimbov, A.A., Belik, V. G., Zharik, B.N., Papchenko, A.Y., Ryabinsky, F.G., & Sergeev, A.S. (1988). Electroplasmolyzer for processing vegetable stock , US Patent no. 4723483. Schwartzberg, H.G., (1983) Expression-related propertie s. In M. Peleg & E.B. Bagley, Eds., Physical properties of food(pp. 423-472). AVI Pupl. Comp., Connecticut. Tsuruta, T., Ishimoto, Y., & Masuoka T. (1998). Effect of glyc erol on intracellular ice formation and dehydration of onion epidermis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 858 , 217-226. 9Vorobiev, E.I., Bazhal, M.I., & Lebovka, N.I. (2000). Optim ization of pulsed electric field treatment of apple slices by pressing. In Proceedings of the 8thInternational Congress on Engineering and Food ICEF8 , Puebla, Mexico, 9-13 April, 2000, 265. Weaver, J.C., & Chizmadzev, Yu.A. (1996). Theory of electro poration: A review. Biolectrochemistry and Bioener- getics, 41 (1), 135-160. Zimmermann, U. (1975). Electrical breakdown: electroperm eabilization and electrofusion. Reviews of Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology, 105 , 176-256. FIG. 1. Experimental set-up. FIG. 2. Typical experimental curves for different reduced pr operties: liquid yield Yr, instantaneous flow rate vr, pressure Prand specific electrical conductivity σrversus time of the expression t. For the convenience of presentation all properties here are reduced to their maximal values, e.g., Yr=Y/Y max, etc., flow rate is determined as v=dY/dt . The error bars represent standard deviations of data. At the top we show the proposed s cheme of changes in the cellular tissue structure with time. FIG. 3. SEM micrographs of apple tissue: (a) before treatmen t, (b) after pressing ( P= 3 bars, t= 600 s), (c) after simultaneous PEF & pressing treatment ( P= 3 bars, tp= 330 s, E= 500 V cm−1,t= 600 s). FIG. 4. Execution steps in the procedure of experimental cur ves normalization: examples of real experimental curves of expressed liquid yield Y(%) versus time tobtained for E= 520 V cm−1andtp= 600 s (a); definition of the first normalized form of liquid yield YI E(b); and definition of the second normalized form of liquid yi eldYII E(c). FIG. 5. Kinetics of normalized excess liquid yield ∆ Y=YII E−YII E=0at different values of tpandE. The error bars represent standard deviations in the data. FIG. 6. Degree of PEF treatment intensification Y∗(a) and coefficient of PEF enhanced durability τ∗(b) versus electric field strength Eat different values of PEF treatment application time tp. The error bars represent standard deviations in the data. FIG. 7. Specific electrical conductivity, σ, (a) and instantaneous flow rate v(b) versus time of expression, t, attp= 120 s and different values of E. The error bars represent standard deviations in the data. FIG. 8. Schematic of the model of PEF treatment with and witho ut pressure P. The conductivity of the sample is higher for case when the pressure is applied. FIG. 9. Reduced pressure P∗=P/P max(a) and pressure difference PE=0−PE(a) versus time of expression, t, at different values of tpandE. The error bars represent standard deviations in the data. FIG. 10. Absorbance and transmittance of liquid yielded dur ing pressing versus electric field strength, E, at different values of PEF treatment application time, tp. The error bars represent standard deviations in the data. 10This figure "f1.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f2.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f3.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f4.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f5.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f6.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f7.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f8.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f9.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1This figure "f10.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0005080v1

arXiv:physics/0005081v1 [physics.atom-ph] 30 May 2000Atomic micromotion and geometric forces in a triaxial magne tic trap J. H. M¨ uller, O. Morsch, D. Ciampini, M. Anderlini, R. Manne lla, and E. Arimondo INFM, Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit` a di Pisa, Via Buon arroti 2, I-56127 Pisa, Italy (July 13, 2011) Non-adiabatic motion of Bose-Einstein condensates of ru- bidium atoms arising from the dynamical nature of a time- orbiting-potential (TOP) trap was observed experimentall y. The orbital micromotion of the condensate in velocity space at the frequency of the rotating bias field of the TOP was de- tected by a time-of-flight method. A dependence of the equi- librium position of the atoms on the sense of rotation of the bias field was observed. We have compared our experimental findings with numerical simulations. The nonadiabatic fol- lowing of the atomic spin in the trap rotating magnetic field produces geometric forces acting on the trapped atoms. PACS number(s): 03.65.Bz,32.80.Pj,45.50.-j Magnetic trapping has become a standard technique for confining and evaporatively cooling ultra-cold sam- ples of neutral atoms. Up to now, BEC in alkali atoms has been achieved in two different kinds of magnetic traps: static traps, and dynamic ones, also called time- orbiting-potential (TOP) traps [1]. In the latter, intro- duced in [2], a quadrupole magnetic field is modified by a rotating homogeneous bias field which causes the quadrupole field to orbit around the origin, thus elimi- nating the zero of the magnetic field at the trap center. In the original scheme with cylindrical symmetry [2], the bias field rotates in the symmetry plane of the quadrupole field, whereas in a later version [3] the plane of rotation contains the quadrupole symmetry axis, which yields a completely asymmetric (triaxial) magnetic trap. In the present work, precise measurements on the motion of a 87Rb condensate in the triaxial TOP trap have allowed us to discover new dynamical features, beyond the approx- imations previously applied in the theoretical treatment of time-dependent magnetic traps. In the adiabatic approximation the spins of the mag- netically trapped atoms follow the instantaneous direc- tion of the magnetic field. Generally speaking, an adia- batic approximation is applied when the evolution of one set of variables of a system is fast compared to the time scale of a second one. While the full dynamics can be quite complicated and hard to analyze, in a useful ap- proximation the fast motion is solved for fixed values of the slow coordinates, and then the slow dynamics is con- sidered to be governed by the average values of the fast motion. In a classical description, the energy of the fast motion calculated for fixed values of the variables of the slow system acts as a potential in which the evolution of the slow system takes place. In an improved approxi-mation, reaction forces act on the slow dynamics. They are related to the geometric phase and to the geomet- ric gauge fields [4]. In the classical case, the physical origin of the geometric forces has been studied, e.g., for atomic systems with spins [5]. For atomic motion in an inhomogeneous magnetic field, the slow atomic external degree of freedom acts as a “guiding center” for the evo- lution of the fast precessing spin variables coupled to the magnetic field. The resulting geometric forces are usu- ally very small and hard to detect. Analogous terms in the calculation of molecular spectra beyond the Born- Oppenheimer approximation do, however, lead to mea- surable shifts of energy levels, underlining the usefulnes s of the concept [4]. In the TOP trap, the guiding-center atomic motion within the time-dependent inhomogeneous magnetic field acquires an additional dynamic feature associated with the periodic evolution of the rotating field, feature not present in the analyses of [5]. Because the frequency of the bias field rotation is typically much larger than the vibrational frequencies of the atoms in the trap, in an additional approximation a time-average over the period of the rotating field is usually performed. Application of both adiabatic and time-average approximations predicts a description of the atomic motion in terms of a time- independent potential. A number of theoretical studies have considered the role of the nonadiabatic dynamics [6] or of the time-dependent potential on the atomic evolu- tion in a TOP trap [7]. Experimental investigations, how- ever, have restricted their attention mainly to the atomic response to the time-independent adiabatic potential. The breakdown of the time-average approximation and of the adiabatic spin following approximation, and the evidence for additional geometric forces are visible in the following measurements on a87Rb condensate [8] in a triaxial trap: i) the atomic micromotion at the frequency of the bias field, ii) the change of the atomic equilibrium position in the trap when inverting the sense of rotation of the bias field [9], iii) the dependence of the rotation- sensitive equilibrium position on the applied magnetic fields. The dependence of the equilibrium position on the sense of rotation of the bias field does not violate any fun- damental symmetry law, as the handedness of the Lar- mor precession for an atom in a trapped state defines the sense of rotation in the atomic evolution. In our experi- mental investigation,as for other TOP traps, the typical conditions for applying the adiabatic and time-averaged approximations are not violated [11]. A precise detec- tion of the micromotion, however, allowed us to perform 1measurements of the non-adiabatic effects present in the TOP trap. We have compared our results with analytical models and numerical simulations based on a completely classical description, obtaining good agreement. Our experimental apparatus [12] is based on a double- MOT system with two cells connected by a glass tube to capture, cool and transfer atoms into a magnetic TOP trap. The latter consists of a pair of quadrupole coils oriented along a horizontal axis and two pairs of bias- field coils, one incorporated into the quadrupole coils and the other along a horizontal axis perpendicular to that of the quadrupole coils, as shown in Fig. 1. After transfer- ring the atoms into the TOP-trap, we evaporatively cool them first by reducing the radius of the quadrupole orbit and finally by applying an RF-field. Once Bose-Einstein condensation has occurred in the |F= 2, mF= 2/angbracketrightstate, we adiabatically changed the quadrupole gradient and the bias field to the desired values. The instantaneous magnetic field seen by the atoms is: B=/bracketleftbig 2b′x+B0cosω0t/bracketrightbigˆi+/bracketleftbig −b′y+B0sinω0t/bracketrightbigˆj−b′zˆk(1) where b′is the quadrupole gradient along the z-axis, and B0andω0are the magnitude and the frequency of the bias field, respectively. FIG. 1. Schematic of the static and rotating magnetic fields confining the condensate, and of the shadow-imaging method. Imaging along the y-axis allowed us to measure the velocity of the atoms along the xandzaxes. For our trap parameters the spatial amplitude of the micromotion in the trap was less than 1 µm, well below our resolution limit of 5 µm. Application of the adiabatic and time-average approx- imations leads to an oscillatory motion of the atoms in a time-independent potential with a harmonic frequencies ωx:ωy:ωzof 2 : 1 :√ 2, where ωx=b′/radicalbig 2µ/mB 0, mbeing the mass and µthe magnetic moment of an atom in the trapped state [3]. Lifting the time-average approximation yields the atomic micromotion, becausethe atoms experience a time-dependent potential at fre- quency ω0and its harmonics. Expansion of the potential energy Ufor atoms close to the trap center gives addi- tional linear terms ∆ Umodulated at the frequency ω0 on top of the effective harmonic potential, with ∆U=µb′(2xcosω0t−ysinω0t). (2) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0v0x (mm/s) 400 300 200 100 0 b' (G/cm)(a) 9 8 7 6v0x (mm/s) 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0ω0 /2π (kHz)-505v0x (mm/s) 2 1 0 phase (rad)π π (b) FIG. 2. Dependence of the micromotion velocity v0xonb′ atω0= 2π×104s−1in (a) and on ω0in (b). In (b), b′ =329 Gcm−1andB0=28 G. In (a), for gradients larger than 200 Gcm−1,B0= 28 G was used, whereas for smaller gradi- entsB0was reduced in order to maintain a small gravitational sag. Continuous lines from Eqs. (3). The inset in (a) shows the velocity dependence on the phase of the bias field at which the trap was switched off (zero phase corresponds to the bias field pointing along the direction of observation). For trap oscillation frequencies well below ω0, separa- tion of the time scales allows us to write down the atomic micromotion at ω0as a small shaking motion on top of the secular motion in the trap. Balancing the restoring force from the ∆ Upotential with the centrifugal force of the resulting orbital motion yields a periodic micromo- tion with velocity amplitudes v0x=2µb′ mω0and v0y=µb′ mω0. (3) In order to observe the micromotion of the atoms at the TOP-frequency, the trap fields were switched off in a time (less than 20 µs) short compared to the period of the TOP-field [13]. The instant at which the trapping fields were switched off was determined to better than 1% of a TOP-cycle. After switching off the quadrupole field at 2a well-defined phase of the rotating bias field and after a variable delay of up to 8 ms, we imaged the absorption shadow of the falling cloud onto a CCD-chip. Because of the small spatial amplitude of the micromotion, the measured position of the atoms along the x-axis after the time-of-flight was determined solely by their initial velocity v0xin that direction (see Fig. 1). A typical plot of v0xas a function of the bias-field phase is shown in the inset of Fig. 2. A velocity amplitude of 5 mms−1corresponds to a spatial amplitude of the micromotion around 100 nm. Also shown in Fig. 2 is the dependence of v0xon the quadrupole gradient and on the frequency of the rotating bias field. We found no dependence of v0xonB0. All of these dependencies are in agreement with Eq. (3)(continuous lines in Fig. 2). We checked by numerical integration of the equations of motion in the adiabatic approximation that the finite switching time of the trapping field leads to a reduction of the measured micromotion velocity of at most a few percent compared to Eq. 3. -40-2002040z (µm) 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 1.05 t (s) cw rotation ccw rotation ∆zeq FIG. 3. Centre-of-mass oscillations of atoms in the TOP-trap for clockwise and counterclockwise rotation of th e bias field. The gradient b′and the bias field B0were 20.8 Gcm−1and 4 G, respectively. The equilibrium positions for the two cases are indicated by the horizontal lines. When the sense of rotation of the bias field was re- versed, the phase of the measured velocity was shifted by 180 degrees, in accordance with the physical picture of the atoms being ‘dragged’ along by the instantaneous position of the quadrupole center. On top of this phase shift, we observed a shift in the vertical equilibrium po- sition of the atoms in the TOP-trap. We achieved a high resolution of the equilibrium position by using very small condensate clouds and by exciting dipole oscillations of the cloud along the z-axis. Typical results of such mea- surements for the two senses of rotation of the bias field are shown in Fig. 3. Fitting a sinusoidal curve to the position data we determined the absolute centre of the oscillations to within 5 µm and the relative position of the centers to within 3 µm. Identical conditions for both senses of rotation were ensured by powering the bias coilsfrom two phase-locked signal generators and shifting their relative phase by 180 degrees to reverse the sense of ro- tation whilst keeping all other parameters constant. 20 10 0∆zeq(µm) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1/B0 (G-1)25 20 15 10 5 0∆zeq(µm) 50x10-3 40 30 20 10 01/b' (cm/G)40 30 20 10 0ωz /2π (Hz) ∆zeq νz(a) (b) FIG. 4. (a) shows the dependence on the quadrupole gradi- entb′of the splitting ∆ zeqof the equilibrium positions (filled symbols) for opposite senses of rotation of the bias field, an d dependence of the oscillation frequencies (open symbols). The solid and dotted lines are the results of a numerical simula- tionwithout the adiabatic approximation. The dashed line is the prediction of Eq.4; B0= 4 G for all points. In (b) we plot the dependence of the splitting (symbols: data, solid line: nu- merical simulation) on the inverse of the bias field strength for fixed gradient ( b′= 20 Gcm−1). The measured dependence of the spatial separation ∆zeqof the two equilibrium positions on the inverse of the quadrupole gradient, 1 /b′, is shown in Fig. 4 (a). For large gradients, we find a linear dependence of ∆ zeqon 1/b′, whereas for the smallest gradients the splitting data deviate significantly from a straight line as b′approaches the minimum gradient, b′ min= 15.3 Gcm−1, necessary to balance gravity. In Fig. 4 (b) the measured dependence of ∆zeqon the inverse of the bias-field B0is shown. Also plotted in Fig. 4 (a) is the dependence of ωzon 1/b′, al- lowing a calibration of b′with an accuracy of two percent over a very large range. We have solved numerically the coupled differential equations of [10] for the center of mass motion and atomic spin within our TOP trap field. The numerical simula- tions provided an excellent fit for the results of Fig. 4 [14]. To find the equilibrium position, a transient damp- ing was introduced in the numerical integration of the evolutions for the center-of-mass and/or the spin. We 3have verified that damping rates corresponding to the trap lifetime do not modify the atomic micromotion and the non-adiabatic effects. However the role of additional damping mechanisms, for instance the viscous heating of [2], should be tested. To interpret the dependence of the splitting ∆ zeqon the field gradient, a transformation to a frame rotat- ing synchronously with the bias field may be applied, as in [9,10]. For the special case of a cylindrical TOP trap this transformation completely removes the time de- pendence. The frame rotation acting on the spin vari- ables introduces a fictitious (geometric) magnetic field Bg=−mF¯hω0ˆk/µalong the rotation axis, with mF¯h the atomic internal angular momentum. In a refined adi- abatic approximation the spin is aligned with the effec- tive field, i.e. the sum of the real and geometric magnetic fields. The occurrence of transverse components of the the spin with respect to the real magnetic field lies at the heart of the concept of geometric forces. The geometric field shifts vertically the plane of the quadrupole orbit. The difference ∆ zeqin the equilibrium positions for cw and ccw rotations of the bias field is ∆zeq= 2mF¯h|ω0| µb′. (4) Gravity shifts the equilibrium position zeqdownwards, but for a cylindrical trap the above result for ∆ zeqis not modified. The expressions for the geometric force of [5] give rise to an equivalent result for the geometric field and the splitting ∆ zeq. While for the cylindrical TOP trap the transformation to the rotating frame takes care completely of the spin dynamics, for the triaxial TOP trap the rotating frame transformation does not result in a time-independent problem. In fact, at low b′values, approaching b′ min, the splitting data of Fig. 4(a) deviate from the behavior described by Eq. (4). Higher order geometric terms derived in [5] lead to corrections several orders of magnitude too small to explain these deviations. Numerically we found that at zero gravity also for the triaxial TOP trap ∆ zeqis well described by Eq. (4). This leads us to conjecture that gravity modifies the fast correlation between spin orientation and center-of-mass motion responsible for the geometric forces. In summary, in a TOP trap the micromotion and the splitting of the equilibrium positions of the atoms for op- positely rotating bias fields are accounted for by a lifting of the time-average and adiabatic approximations. The dependence of the splitting on the magnetic field gra- dient arises from the nonadiabatic characteristics of the TOP trap. The micromotion in a TOP-trap is of rele- vance for experiments where an accurate control of the condensate residual motion on the recoil velocity scale (5 mms−1) is required, e.g. in atom lasers or condensate transfer. The observed dependence of the equilibrium position on the bias field rotation hopefully motivates theoretical efforts to calculate higher order corrections t othe adiabatic spin evolution in the TOP-trap configura- tion. Finally it should be tested, theoretically and exper- imentally, whether the condensate response to the par- allel transport of the atomic spin in a TOP trap, which gives rise to the geometric forces, may influence also the internal dynamics of the condensate. We thank G. Smirne for help in the data acquisi- tion. O.M. gratefully acknowledges financial support from the European Union (TMR Contract-Nr. ERBFM- RXCT960002). This work was supported by the INFM “Progetto di Ricerca Avanzata”, and by the CNR “Pro- getto Integrato”. [1] Recent reviews by W. Ketterle, et al., and by E. Cornell, et al. inBose-Einstein condensation in atomic gases” , edited by M. Inguscio, S. Stringari and C. Wieman (IOS Press, Amsterdam) 1999. [2] W. Petrich, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74,3353 (1995). [3] E.W. Hagley, et al., Science 283, 1706 (1999). [4] M.V. Berry, in Geometric Phases in Physics , edited by A. Shapere and F. Wilczek (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989) pp. 1-28. [5] Y. Aharonov and A. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3593 (1992); R.G. Littlejohn and S. Weigert, Phys. Rev. A 48, 924 (1993); M.V. Berry and J.M. Robbins, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 442, 641 (1993); M.V. Berry, ibid.452, 1207 (1996). [6] V.I. Yukalov, Phys. Rev. A 56, 5004 (1997); V.E. Shapiro, ibid.60, 719 (1999). [7] A.B. Kuklov, et al. , Phys. Rev. A 55, 488 (1997); V.G. Minogin, et al.,ibid.58, 3138 (1998). [8] We used condensates mainly because their small size greatly facilitated precise position measurements. Exper - iments with evaporatively cooled thermal clouds yielded the same results within the experimental uncertainty. [9] The rotation sensitive condensate position was discuss ed by D.S. Hall, et al., Proc. SPIE 3270, 98 (1998). It is also contained implicitly in in the analytical model of [10]. [10] S. Gov and S. Shtrikman, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 2250 (1999). [11] TOP traps have been used for BEC in [2,3] and by D.J.Han, et al., Phys. Rev. A 57R4114 (1998); J.L. Mar- tin,et al., J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32, 3065 (1999); J. Arlt, et al.,ibid.325861 (1999). [12] J.H. M¨ uller, et al. J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. in press and condmat/0005133. [13] The switch-off time of the bias field, limited by the qual- ity factor of tank circuits was around 150 µs. However, fast switching of the bias field was not required as the atoms are no longer trapped once the quadrupole field is extinguished. [14] We should mention that the agreement between simula- tions and experiments becomes less satisfactory for very elliptical bias field in the x−yplane. 4

arXiv:physics/0005082v1 [physics.atom-ph] 30 May 2000Long-range interaction of two metastable rare-gas atoms A. Derevianko and A. Dalgarno Institute for Theoretical Atomic and Molecular Physics, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (February 2, 2008) We present semiempirical calculations of long-range van de r Waals interactions for two interacting metastable rare-gas atoms Ne through Xe. Dispersion coeffici entsC6are obtained for homonuclear molecular potentials asymptotically connecting to the ns(3/2)2+ns(3/2)2atomic states. The estimated uncertainty of the calculated C6dispersion coefficients is 4%. Motivated by cold-collision studies of metastable rare-ga s atoms [1–4] and prospects of achieving Bose-Einstein Condensation in these systems [5], we present calculations of long-range dispersion (van der Waals) coefficients for two atoms interacting in the ns(3/2)2atomic states ( n= 3 for Ne, n= 4 for Ar, n= 5 for Kr, and n= 6 for Xe). The metastable states have long lifetimes, 43 sec for Xe [6], dec aying to the ground1S0state by a weak magnetic-quadrupole transition. With such a long lifetime the metastable atom be haves as an effective ground state in experiments. Compared to alkali-metal systems, an attractive feature of the noble gas atoms is the availability of isotopes with zero nuclear spin. The lack of hyperfine structure leads to a s ubstantial simplification of molecular potentials, though some complexity arises due to the nonvanishing total electr on angular momentum ( J=2) of the metastable state. The anisotropy leads to fifteen distinct long-range molecul ar states connecting to the ns(3/2)2+ns(3/2)2asymptotic configuration. Our theoretical treatment of long-range interactions is si milar to recent high-precision calculations of van der Waal s coefficients for alkali-metal atoms [7]. By using many-body m ethods and accurate experimental matrix elements for the principal transitions, leading dispersion coefficients C6were determined to an accuracy better than 1% for Na, K, and Rb, and of 1% for Cs and 1.5% for Fr. The semiempirical values of C6coefficients for metastable noble-gas atoms obtained here have an estimated uncertainty of 4%. The approach relies on the determination of dynamic polarizability functions. To construct the polarizabilit ies we combine experimental lifetime [8–15] and energy data of the excited states with accurate semiempirical dynamic pol arizabilities of the ground states of noble-gas atoms [16]. The theoretical lifetimes and branching ratios [17] are adj usted to reproduce the measured static polarizabilities [1 8], which are known with a 2% uncertainty. We estimated the addit ional small contributions within the Dirac-Hartree- Fock framework. The resulting polarizabilities satisfy th e Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn oscillator strength sum rule. The Racah notation for atomic levels is used. The particle-h ole states are labeled as nℓ(K)Jornℓ′(K)J, where n andℓare the principal and the orbital angular momentum quantum n umbers of the valence electron and K=Jc+ℓ, where Jcis the angular momentum of the core. The primed configuration s converge to a Rydberg series limit with a hole in the ( n−1)p1/2state, and the unprimed to a hole in the ( n−1)p3/2state. The manifold of the lowest ns valence states has four fine-structure states ns′(1/2)0,1andns(3/2)1,2, and the lowest npmanifold consists of ten states. We investigate here the molecular potentials asymp totically connecting to the ns(3/2)2atomic states. We calculate the long-range molecular potentials in the fra mework of Rayleigh-Schroedinger perturbation theory. The basis functions are defined as products of atomic wavefun ctions |M1M2; Ω/angbracketright=|ns(3/2)2M1/angbracketright1|ns(3/2)2M2/angbracketright2, (1) where the index 1(2) describes the wavefunction located on t he center 1(2) and Ω = M1+M2,M1,2being projections of the atomic total angular momentum on the internuclear axi s. Due to the axial symmetry of a dimer Ω is a conserved quantum number. It takes values ranging from zero to four. Th e two-atom basis (1) is degenerate and the correct molecular wavefunctions are obtained by diagonalizing the molecular Hamiltonian ˆH=ˆH1+ˆH2+ˆV(R). (2) In expression (2) ˆHkrepresent the Hamiltonians of the two non-interacting atom s, and ˆV(R) is the interaction potential at an internuclear distance R. The energy of the ns(3/2)2metastable state is designated as E∗. Then in the model space (1) /parenleftBig ˆH1+ˆH2/parenrightBig |M1M2; Ω/angbracketright= 2E∗|M1M2; Ω/angbracketright. The residual electrostatic potential ˆV(R) is defined as the full Coulomb interaction energy in the dime r excluding interactions of the atomic electrons with their parent nucl ei. 1The multipole interactions ( L= 1 for dipole-dipole, and L= 2 for quadrupole-quadrupole interactions) are given by [19] VLL(R) =1 R2L+1L/summationdisplay µ=−L(2L)! (L−µ)!(L+µ)!/parenleftBig T(L) µ/parenrightBig 1/parenleftBig T(L) −µ/parenrightBig 2, (3) with the multipole spherical tensors T(L) µ=−|e|/summationdisplay irL iC(L) µ(ˆri), (4) where the summation is over atomic electrons, riis the position vector of electron i, andC(L) µ(ˆri) are reduced spherical harmonics [20]. In the following we write dµ=T(1) µandQµ=T(2) µ. The lowest-order contribution to the term energies arises f rom the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction ˆVqq, which varies as 1 /R5. However, the corresponding C5coefficients are only of the order 101−102a.u. [2], and the dominant contribution appears in the second order in ˆV(R), arising from the dipole-dipole interaction ˆVdd. The second-order dipole interaction is proportional to 1 /R6, and the associated dispersion coefficient C6is of the order of 104−105a.u.. Applying the formalism of degenerate perturbation theory i n second order [21], we obtain an effective Hamiltonian within the two-atom basis Eq. (1) /angbracketleftm|H(2) eff|n/angbracketright= 2E∗δmn+/angbracketleftm|ˆVqq|n/angbracketright+/summationdisplay Ψi/angbracketleftm|ˆVdd|Ψi/angbracketright/angbracketleftΨi|ˆVdd|n/angbracketright 2E∗−Ei. (5) The intermediate molecular state |Ψi/angbracketrightwith unperturbed energy Eiruns over a complete set of two-atom states, excluding the model-space states Eq. (1). The formalism of t he generalized Bloch equation [22] would allow the inclusion in the model space of the other three atomic states in the nsmanifold and would account for the mixing of the different fine-structure levels; but such a large model space is not necessary for R >10 a.u.. The position of the avoided level crossing can be estimated from Rl.c.≈2C6/(Ens(3/2)1− Ens(3/2)2)∼10 a.u.. The Ω = 4 molecular term is unique and being unaffected by avoided crossings, the region of applicability is extended to R∼na.u., before the electronic clouds start to overlap. The effect of the quad rupole-quadrupole interaction on the term energy can be disregarded at values of R≪C6/C5∼103a.u.. The quadrupole-quadrupole correction is discussed b y Doery et al.[3]. Using the Wigner-Eckart theorem, we can represent the matri x element of the dipole-dipole term in the effective second-order Hamiltonian as /summationdisplay Ψi/angbracketleftM1M2; Ω|ˆVdd|Ψi/angbracketright/angbracketleftΨi|ˆVdd|M′ 1M′ 2; Ω/angbracketright 2E∗−Ei= −1 R6/summationdisplay II′CJaJb 6(−1)Ja+Jb2 3/summationdisplay λµw1 λw1 µAJa λµ(M1, M′ 1)AJb −λ−µ(Ω−M1,Ω−M′ 1). (6) The dipole weights w1 µarew1 +1=w1 −1= 1, and w1 0= 2.JaandJbare the corresponding total angular momenta of intermediate atomic states of atoms 1 and 2, and AI λµ(M1, M′ 1) =/parenleftbigg 2 1 I −M1µ m/parenrightbigg/parenleftbigg I1 2 −m λ M′ 1/parenrightbigg , (7) where m=1 2(M1+M′ 1+λ−µ). The intermediate (uncoupled) dispersion coefficients are CJaJb 6=3 π/integraldisplay∞ 0dω S Ja(iω)SJb(iω). (8) The reduced dynamic dipole polarizability SI(iω) of purely imaginary argument is defined as the sum over atomi c states |αIIMI/angbracketrightwith total angular momentum Iand energy EαI SI(iω) =/summationdisplay αI(E∗− EαI)/angbracketleftns(3/2)2||d||αII/angbracketright/angbracketleftαII||d||ns(3/2)2/angbracketright (E∗− EαI)2+ω2. (9) 2HereαIstands for all quantum numbers of the intermediate state, ex cept for the total angular momentum I, and /angbracketlefti||d||j/angbracketrightare the reduced electric-dipole matrix elements, defined by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. Three sums with I= 1,2,3 are allowed by electric-dipole selection rules. We proceed now to construct the dipole polarizability funct ionsSI(iω), Eq. (9), evaluate the uncoupled dispersion coefficients (8), and set and diagonalize the second-order eff ective Hamiltonian (5). The functions SI(iω) satisfy several sum rules. In particular, the static tenso r dipole polarizability αzz(M) of the ns(3/2)2state may be expressed as αzz(M) =−2/summationdisplay I(−1)I/parenleftbigg 2 1 I −M0M/parenrightbigg2 ×SI(0). (10) The static tensor dipole polarizabilities αzz(M= 1) and αzz(M= 2) of metastable noble-gas atoms Ne through Xe have been measured by Molof et al. [18] to within an error of 2%. In the present calculations the values of SI(0) are adjusted to reproduce these experimental values. In add ition, as ω→ ∞, the reduced polarizabilities satisfy the nonrelativistic Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn (TRK) sum rule /summationdisplay nfkn=2 15/summationdisplay I(−1)I+1SI(i∞) =N , (11) Nbeing the number of electrons in the atom. Our constructed po larizabilities satisfy the sum rule. It is instructive to consider the action of a one-particle op erator on the reference particle-hole Slater determinant ns(3/2)2in the independent electron approximation. Such an operato r can (i) annihilate the reference particle-hole pair; (ii) promote a valence electron from ns1/2state to another valence state mp1/2,3/2, the state of the ( n−1)p3/2 hole being unchanged; (iii) deexcite the ( n−1)p3/2hole into some other hole state, the valence state remaining the same, and (iv) create another particle-hole pair in additio n to the reference pair. According to such a classification it is convenient to break the polarizability function, Eq. (9) , into three contributions Sk Icorresponding to a number k of particle-hole pairs in the intermediate state |αII/angbracketright SI=S0 I+S1 I+S2 I. Since an electric-dipole transition from ns(3/2)2to the closed-core state1S0is prohibited by the angular selection rules, S0 I≡0. The sum S1 Iis separated into contributions from the intermediate stat es in the lowest npfine-structure multiplet/parenleftbig S1 I/parenrightbig np, and the rest of the sum/parenleftbig S1 I/parenrightbig′ S1 I=/parenleftbig S1 I/parenrightbig np+/parenleftbig S1 I/parenrightbig′. The first term is the dominant contribution. We calculate/parenleftbig S1 I/parenrightbig npusing experimental values of transition energies and decay rates, and adjusted branching ratios. The rest of the s um over valence states (including bound and continuum states) ( S1 I)′is estimated in the Dirac-Hartree-Fock (DHF) approximatio n. The metastable state |vh;J/angbracketrightin lowest order is represented as a combination of the |v/angbracketright=ns1/2particle state and the hole state |h/angbracketright= (n−1)p3/2, coupled to the total angular momentum J= 2, [(( n−1)p3/2)−1ns1/2]2. The lowest-order energy of such a state is E∗=εv−εh, εibeing the energy of the DHF orbital |i/angbracketright. The intermediate state is represented as |ma;I/angbracketright, a particle state mcoupled with hole state ato the total momentum I. Explicitly, (S1 I)′(iω) = (−1)J+I[I][J]/summationdisplay ma′/parenleftBigg δha(εv−εm)/angbracketleftv||d||m/angbracketright2 (εv−εm)2+ω2/braceleftbigg J1I jmjhjv/bracerightbigg2 +δmv(εa−εh)/angbracketlefth||d||a/angbracketright2 (εa−εh)2+ω2/braceleftbigg J1I jajvjh/bracerightbigg2/parenrightBigg , where [ K]≡2K+ 1, the summation is performed over the core orbitals aand excited states m, excluding states of the lowest npmultiplet, and J= 2. The first sum is associated with excitation of the valence electron (case (ii)) while the second sum with deexcitation of the hole state (case (iii )). To arrive at this result we disregarded the coupling between levels within the same fine-structure multiplet. Fo r example, for Ne the [(2 p3/2)−14p1/2]2, [(2p3/2)−14p3/2]2, and [(2 p1/2)−14p3/2]2states are summed over independently, even though the corre ct lowest-order wave-function is a linear combination of them. This approximation correspon ds to a disregard of the small difference between the 3energies of the coupled and uncoupled states. Since the cont ribution ( S1 I)′is relatively small, such an estimate suffices at the present level of accuracy. Numerical evaluation of ( S1 I)′has been performed using a B-spline basis set in the VN−1DHF potential, with the hole in the ( n−1)p3/2core orbital [23]. We separate the sum S2 Iover the core excited states into two contributions S2 I=/parenleftbig S2 I/parenrightbig core+/parenleftbig S2 I/parenrightbig cntr. The first term is associated with the dynamic polarizability αg(iω) of the closed-shell ground state1S0and the second term is a corrective counter term. /parenleftbig S2 I/parenrightbig core(iω) = (−1)I+J+1[I] 2αg(iω). (12) We use the semiempirical dynamic polarizabilities for the g round states of noble-gas atoms of Kumar and Meath [16]. The estimated uncertainty of these core polarizabilities i s less than 1%. The primary role of the core polarizability is to provide the correct limit Eq. (11) at ω→ ∞. The relative importance of the core-excitation contribut ion increases for heavier systems; for example, in a similar cal culation for Fr [7], core excitations contribute 23% of the C6dispersion coefficient. The high-frequency limit, Eq. (11), is accurately reproduced by the present totalreduced dynamic polarizabilities SI(iω). We obtain for Ne 9.98, for Ar 17.95, for Kr 35.95, and for Xe 5 3.96 compared to the nonrelativistically exact values 10, 18, 36, and 54 respect ively. In the ns(3/2)2= [((n−1)p3/2)−1ns1/2]2state core excitations to the occupied magnetic sub-states of the ns1/2 particle state are not allowed by the Pauli exclusion princi ple, and neither are the core excitations from the empty magnetic sub-state of the hole ( n−1)p3/2. To remove these transitions from the core polarizability c ontribution/parenleftbig S2 I/parenrightbig core, we introduce a counter term/parenleftbig S2 I/parenrightbig cntr. Explicitly in the independent-electron model /parenleftbig S2 I/parenrightbig cntr(iω) = [I][J] (−1)I+J/parenleftBigg/summationdisplay a(εv−εa)/angbracketlefta||d||v/angbracketright2 (εv−εa)2+ω2/braceleftbigg 1J I jhjajv/bracerightbigg2 +/summationdisplay m(εm−εh)/angbracketlefth||d||m/angbracketright2 (εm−εh)2+ω2/braceleftbigg 1J I jvjmjh/bracerightbigg2/parenrightBigg . We estimate the small counter-term using the Dirac-Hartree -Fock approximation. The largest contribution to the sums SIarises from the intermediate states in the lowest npfine-structure multiplet. The determination of electric-dipole matrix elements invo lved in the sum/parenleftbig S1 I/parenrightbig nprequires a knowledge of both decay rates and branching ratios in the manifold. The relevant lif etimes have been measured to within an error less than 1% for Ne [8,9], Ar [10] and Kr [11], and less than 3% for Xe [12–14 ]. However, the branching ratios Bare not established to the same precision. The most accurate measurements of Bin Ne [8,9], have an error bar of approximately 4-5%, which would introduce an uncertainty of 4-5% in the static po larizabilities, and 8-10% inaccuracy in the values of C6. To reduce the consequent errors, the experimental values of the static polarizability, accurate to 2%, were chosen as the reference data. The branching ratios of transitions to the ns(3/2)2state have been adjusted as follows. The sum S3(0) includes only one intermediate state in the npmanifold, np(5/2)3, and very small ab initio corrections. The np(5/2)3state has a single decay channel, so that the sum S3(0) is known with the experimental precision of the decay rat e. The sums S2(0) and S1(0) can be deduced from the experimental values of the static tensor polarizability as S1(0) =−9 14S3(0) + 5 αzz(1)−5 4αzz(2) S2(0) =5 14S3(0)−15 4αzz(2). Removing small ab initio and semiempirical core-excitation contributions from the se sums, the sums/parenleftbig S1 1/parenrightbig np(0) and/parenleftbig S1 2/parenrightbig np(0) are obtained. The branching ratios Bfor four states involved in the J= 1 sum and three states in theJ= 2 sum were multiplied by a uniform scaling factor. Branchin g ratios for Ne [8] for the J= 1 levels were multiplied by 1.0035, and for the J= 2 level by 0.905 in order to reproduce the experimental valu es of the static tensor polarizabilities. We modified the recommended value s ofBfor Ar [15] by multiplying the branching ratios of theJ= 1 states by 0.973 and of the J= 2 states by 0.965; the values used in the calculations are li sted in Table I. For Kr the velocity-gauge branching ratios, tabulated in Re f. [2] from calculations by Aymar and Coulombe [17], were multiplied by 1.127 for the J= 1 states and by 1.0016 for the J= 2 states. For Xe, velocity-gauge values of B 4calculated in Ref. [17] were multiplied by 0.927 for the J= 1 states and by 0.929 for the J= 2 states. The adjusted data for Ar and Xe are listed in Table I. Doery et al. [2] have compiled the input data for Ne and Kr, which have to be similarly modified. We employ the constructed reduced polarizabilities SI(iω) to calculate the intermediate uncoupled dispersion co- efficients CJaJb 6by quadrature using Eq. (8). The coefficients are listed in Tab le II. They are to be used if the entire molecular Hamiltonian, including quadrupole-quadrupole and higher multipoles or perturbation-theory orders is to be diagonalized. Finally, the molecular terms are obtained by the diagonalization of H(2) eff, given by Eq. (5). Neglect of the small corrections due to the quadrupole-quadrupole i nteraction results in parameterization of term energies in the form U(R) = 2E∗−C6/R6. The calculated dispersion coefficients C6for various molecular symmetries are listed in Table III. Si nce the region close to ω= 0 contributes the most to the values of the integral in Eq. (8 ), the uncertainty in the values of C6is approximately 4%, reflecting the 2% experimental error in th e static dipole tensor polarizabilities [18]. The values of the C6coefficients grow monotonically from Ne to Xe, due to the reduc tion in the energy separations between the metastable states and the np-manifold. For heavier systems the anisotropy in C6, arising from relativistic effects becomes increasingly marked, from 6.5% in Ne to 16% in Xe. Long-range dispersion coefficients for two interacting meta stable Ne atoms were evaluated recently by Doery et al.[3]. The C6coefficients were calculated from the diagonalization of the molecular dipole-dipole Hamiltonian in the model space containing the lowest np-manifold, so limiting the intermediate states to the lowes tnp-manifold states in the present formulation. Experimental values of decay ra tes and branching ratios were used to deduce the electric- dipole matrix elements. The precision of the calculated val ues of C6is about 8-10% due to the large uncertainty in the branching ratios. The values of C6from Ref. [3] for different molecular symmetries vary betwee n 1951 and 1956 a.u., exhibiting much less anisotropy than the present resu lts which range between 1877 and 1999 a.u.. The difference can be traced to the anisotropy in the static dipole polariza bilities. Indeed, utilizing input data from Ref. [3] we obtain αzz(M= 1) = 192 and αzz(M= 2) = 189 a.u. if we include only the npmanifold as in Ref. [3]. While αzz(M= 1) agrees with the experimental value [18] 192(4), the αzz(M= 2) is overestimated by three standard deviations compared to the experimental value 180(3) a.u.. The accuracy of the dispersion coefficients could be improved by applying relativistic all-order many-body meth- ods [23,24] to calculate transition amplitudes between ns−npmanifolds. Such ab initio calculations are intrinsically more challenging than for alkali-metal atoms; the accurate experimental lifetimes would provide an excellent gauge of accuracy. Our values of C6coefficients will be useful in studies of cold collisions of me tastable rare-gas atoms [1–4]. For example, we can estimate the rate coefficient for Penning ioni zation by ignoring spin-polarization and assuming that every trajectory that surmounts the angular momentum barri er leads to ionization [1,25]. The corresponding rate coefficient is given by [25] k= 6.35×10−9C1/3 6T1/6 µ1/2cm3s−1, where µis the reduced mass measured in units of the electron mass and Tis the temperature. Combined with short-range potentials [3,26] a number of other properties could be determined. For example, scattering lengths of elastic collisions could be found, providing input for mean -field equations describing dilute quantum gases. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Div ision of Chemical Sciences, Office of Energy Research. Thanks are due to M. R. Doery, S. Kotochigova, and J . F. Babb for useful discussions. The authors are grateful to W. R. Johnson for providing the B-spline routine for the VN−1Dirac-Hartree-Fock potential. TABLE I. Input data for Ar and Xe calculations. Lifetimes τfor Ar are from Volz and Schmoranzer, Ref. [10], and for Xe from Inoue et al., Ref. [12], except where noted. Branching ratios Bto the ns(3/2)2level are adjusted to reproduce experimental tensor dipole polarizabilities, as discussed in the text. Ar,n= 4 Xe,n= 6 state τ, ns B(%) τ, ns B(%) np′(1/2)1 27.85(7) 17.66 43.5(1.5)b5.15 np′(3/2)2 29.01(7) 10.59 38.1(1.3)c2.30 np′(3/2)1 29.83(8) 1.84 49(2) 1.16 np(3/2)2 28.52(7) 68.55 31(1) 65.42 np(3/2)1 29.62(7) 14.97 37(1) 7.45 5np(5/2)2 31.17(7) 27.76 39(1) 33.29 np(5/2)3 29.00(7) 100.00 31(1) 100.00 np(1/2)1 39.2(2.2)a72.11 38(1) 87.60 aWiese et al., Ref. [15]. bAllenet al., Ref. [14]. cHusson and Margerie, Ref. [13]. TABLE II. Intermediate dispersion coefficients CJaJb 6, a.u., multiplied by a factor 10−3. C11 6 C21 6 C22 6 C31 6 C32 6 C33 6 Ne 4.945 -7.333 10.89 10.92 -16.21 24.14 Ar 12.48 -17.42 24.39 27.12 -37.88 59.02 Kr 15.12 -20.18 27.01 31.80 -42.44 66.96 Xe 23.24 -29.22 36.91 47.74 -60.06 98.31 TABLE III. Dispersion coefficients C6in a.u. for the interaction of two metastable ns(3/2)2noble-gas atoms. Term Ne Ar Kr Xe 4g 1877 4417 4994 7138 3g 1919 4565 5195 7490 3u 1922 4583 5224 7557 2g 1967 4751 5459 7991 2g 1935 4629 5286 7664 2u 1934 4623 5276 7641 1u 1983 4811 5543 8148 1g 1982 4810 5541 8145 1g 1920 4574 5210 7524 1u 1920 4574 5210 7526 0+ g 1999 4872 5629 8311 0+ g 1968 4756 5467 8010 0− u 1966 4747 5452 7975 0− u 1877 4418 4996 7140 0+ g 1877 4418 4996 7140 6[1] C. Orzel, M. Walhout, U. Sterr, P. S. Julienne, and S. L. Ro lston, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1926 (1999). [2] M. R. Doery, E. J. D. Vredenbregt, J. G. C. Tempelaars, H. C . W. Beijerinck, and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3603 (1998). [3] M. R. Doery, E. J. D. Vredenbregt, S. S. Op de Beek, H. C. W. B eijerinck, and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3673 (1998). [4] M. Walhout, U. Sterr, C. Orzel, M. Hoogerland, and S.L. Ro lston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 506 (1995). [5] H. C. W. Beijerinck, E. J. D. Vredenbregt, R. J. W. Stas, M. R. Doery, and J. G. C. Tempelaars, Phys. Rev. A 61, 023607 (2000). [6] M. Walhout, A. Witte, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2843 (1994). [7] A. Derevianko, W.R. Johnson, M. S. Safronova, and J.F. Ba bb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3589 (1999). [8] S. A. Kandela, Physica B & C 123C , 370 (1984). [9] P. Hartmetz and H. Schmoranzer, Phys. Lett. 93A, 405 (1983); Z. Phys. A 317, 1 (1984). [10] U. Volz and H. Schmoranzer, Proc. ICAMDATA, (Eds. W.L. W iese, and P.J. Mohr, 1998). [11] H. Schmoranzer and U. Volz, Phys. Scr. T47, 42 (1993). [12] Gen Inoue, J.K. Ku, D.W. Setser, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5760 (1984). [13] X. Husson and J. Margerie, Opt. Commun. 5, 139 (1972). [14] L. Allen, D.G.C. Jones, and G. Schofield, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 842 (1969). [15] W.L. Wiese, J.W. Brault, K.Danzmann,V. Helbig, M. Kock , Phys. Rev. A 39, 2461 (1989). [16] A. Kumar and W.J. Meath, Mol. Phys. 54, 823 (1985). [17] M. Aymar and M. Coulombe, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 21, 537 (1987). [18] R.W. Molof, H.L. Schwartz, Th.M. Miller, and B. Bederso n, Phys. Rev. A 10, 1131 (1974). [19] A. Dalgarno and W. D. Davison, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 2, 1 (1966). [20] D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moscalev, and V. K. Khersonsky , ”Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum” (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988). [21] A. Dalgarno, Ch. 5 in Quantum Theory ,1, (Academic Press, New York, 1961) [22] I. Lindgren and J. Morrison, Atomic Many-Body Theory , (Springer, New York, 1991). [23] E. Avgoustoglou, W.R. Johnson, Z.W. Liu, J. Sapirstein , Phys. Rev. A 51, 1196 (1995). [24] E. N. Avgoustoglou and D. R. Beck, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4286 (1998). [25] K.L. Bell, A. Dalgarno and A.E. Kingston, J. Phys. B 1, 18 (1968). [26] S. Kotochigova, E. Tiesinga, and I. Tupitsyn, Phys. Rev . A61, 042712 (2000). 7

Modulation Instability and Pattern Formation in Spatially Incoherent Light Beams Detlef Kip ,(1,2) Marin Soljacic,(1,3) Mordechai Segev,(1,4) Evgenia Eugenieva,(5) and Demetrios N. Christodoulides(5) (1) Physics Department, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel (2) Physics Department, Universit ät Osnabr ück, 49069 Osnabr ück, Germany (3) Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA (4) Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA (5) Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dept., Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA Modulation Instability (MI) is a universal process that appears in most nonlinear wave systems in nature. Because of MI, small amplitude and phase perturbations (from noise) grow rapidly under the combined effects of nonlinearity and diffraction (or dispersion, in the temporal domain). As a result, a broad optical beam (or a quasi-CW pulse) tends to disintegrate during propagation [1,2], leading to filamentation [2] or to break-up into pulse trains [1]. In general, MI typically occurs in the same parameter region where another universal phenomenon, soliton occurrence, is observed. Solitons are stationary localized wave-packets (wave-packets that never broaden) that share many features with real particles. For example, their total energy and momentum is conserved even when they interact with one another [3]. Intuitively, solitons can be understood as a result of the balance between the broadening tendency of diffraction (or dispersion) and nonlinear self-focusing. A soliton forms when the localized wave-packet induces (via the nonlinearity) a potential and "captures" itself in it, thus becoming a bound state in its own induced potential. In the spatial domain of optics, a spatial soliton forms when a very narrow optical beam induces (through self-focusing) a waveguide structure and guides itself in its own induced waveguide. The relation between MI and solitons is best manifested in the fact that the filaments (or the pulse trains) that emerge from the MI process are actually trains of almost ideal solitons.Therefore, MI can be considered to be a precursor to soliton formation. Over the years, MI has been systematically investigated in connection with numerous nonlinear processes. Yet, it was always believed that MI is inherently a coherent process and thus it can only appear in nonlinear systems with a perfect degree of spatial/temporal coherence. Earlier this year however, our group was able to show theoretically [4] that MI can also exist in relation with partially-incoherent wave-packets or beams. This in turn leads to several important new features: for example, incoherent MI appears only if the ‘strength’ of the nonlinearity exceeds a well-defined threshold that depends on the degree of spatial correlation (coherence). Moreover, by appropriately suppressing MI, new families of solitons are possible which have no counterpart whatsoever in the coherent regime [5]. This prediction of incoherent MI actually reflects on many other nonlinear systems beyond optics: it implies that patterns can form spontaneously (from noise) in nonlinear many-body systems involving weakly-correlated particles, such as, for example, electrons in semiconductors at the vicinity of the quantum Hall regime, high- Tc superconductors, and atomic gases at temperatures slightly higher than Bose -Einstein-Condensation (BEC) temperatures. Here, we present the first experimental observation of modulation instability of partially spatially incoherent light beams in non-instantaneous nonlinear media. We show that even in such a nonlinear partially coherent system (of weakly-correlated particles) patterns can form spontaneously. Incoherent MI occurs above a specific threshold that depends on the beams' coherence properties (correlation distance), and leads to a periodic train of one-dimensional (1D) filaments. At a higher value of nonlinearity, incoherent MI displays a two-dimensional (2D) instability and leads to self-ordered arrays of light spots. Before we proceed to describe incoherent MI, we revisit the main ideas that make incoherent solitons happen. Until a few years ago, solitons were considered to be solely coherent entities. However, in 1996 the first experimental observations of solitons made of partially-spatially-incoherent light [6] and in 1997 of temporally and spatially incoherent ("white") light [7] have proven beyond doubt that incoherent solitons do exist. This sequence of events has opened up entirely new directions in soliton science. Since then, numerous theoretical and experimental papers have been published on bright and dark incoherent solitons: their range of existence and their structure [8-11], their interactions [12], their stability properties [13], and their relation to multimode composite solitons [14]. The existence of incoherent solitons proves that self-focusing is possible not only for coherent wave-packets but also forwave-packets upon which the phase is random. The key to their existence is the non-instantaneous nature of the nonlinearity, which responds only to the beam's time-averaged intensity structure and not to the instantaneous highly speckled and fragmented wave-front. In other words, the response time of the nonlinear medium must be much larger than the average time of phase fluctuations across the beam. Thus, the time-averaged intensity induces, through the nonlinearity, a multimode waveguide structure (a potential well that can bind many states), whose guided modes are populated by the optical field with its instantaneous speckled structure. With this non-instantaneous nature of the nonlinearity in mind, we were motivated to find out if patterns can form spontaneously on a partially coherent uniform beam, through the interplay between nonlinearity and diffraction, in a such a random-phase wave front of uniform intensity. As a first step, we have shown theoretically [4] that a uniform yet partially-incoherent wave-front is unstable in such nonlinear media, provided that the nonlinearity exceeds a well-defined threshold that is set by the coherence properties. Above that threshold, MI should occur, and patterns should form. Here, we experimentally verify these predictions, and reveal a series of new features that relate to the appearance of 2D ordered lattices of filaments. The main predictions of the incoherent MI theory [4] are as follows. (I) The existence of a sharp threshold for the nonlinear index change, below which perturbations (noise) on top of a uniform input beam decay and above which a quasi-periodic pattern forms. (II) The threshold depends upon the coherence properties of the input beam: the threshold increases with decreasing correlation distance (decreasing spatial coherence). (III) Saturation alone, while keeping the maximum index change and correlation distance fixed, arrests the growth rate of the MI and can decrease it to below the MI threshold. In the next sections we describe our experimental results that confirm all of these predictions and also reveal new unexpected features. In our incoherent MI experiments, we use a strontium-barium niobate (SBN :60) crystal and employ its photorefractive screening nonlinearity [15,16], which is of a saturable nature. The dimensions of the sample are a ×b×c=7.0 ×6.5×8.0mm3, where light propagation is along the crystalline a-axis and the external electric bias field is applied along the c-axis. At moderate intensities (1 Watt/cm2) the response time of our crystal is τ ˜ 0.1 seconds, thus for any light beam across which the phase varies much fasterthan τ, the nonlinear crystal responds only to the time-averaged (over times much larger than τ) intensity structure. In our experimental setup, we split a cw argon ion laser beam (of λ=514.5 nm wavelength) into two beams using a polarizing beamsplitter. Each beam is sent through a rotating diffuser which introduces a random phase varying much faster than τ, acting as a source of partially spatially incoherent light. Following the rotating diffusers the beams are expanded, collimated and made uniform, and recombined using another polarizing beamsplitter. Finally both beams are launched into the crystal and co-propagate in it. When an external (bias) dc field is applied to the crystal, the extraordinarily- polarized beam experiences a large index change, and thus serves as the "signal beam", whereas the ordinarily-polarized beam experiences only a tiny index change and therefore serves as a background beam (its only role is to tune the degree of saturation of the nonlinearity [16]). A lens and a polarizer are used to image the signal beam intensity at the output face of the sample onto a CCD camera. We control the degree of coherence of the signal beam by adjusting the diameter of the laser beam incident on the rotating diffuser: the larger the beam diameter, the higher the incoherence and the shorter the correlation distance lc. The background beam is made highly incoherent, which guarantees that it never forms any patterns. We estimate the correlation distance lc (at the input face of the crystal, when the system is linear: zero applied field) as the average value of the full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) of the speckle size on the CCD camera when the diffuser is momentarily stopped. Upon the application of a sufficiently large bias field to the crystal, the signal beam experiences MI and forms patterns (Fig. 1). When the input signal beam is uniform, the underlying nonlinearity is of the form δ n = Δn0 [1+ (I 0 / Isat)] [ I(r) / (I(r) + Isat ) ] , (1) where I(r) is the local intensity as a function of coordinate r, Isat is the intensity of the incident background beam, and I 0 is the intensity of the signal beam at the input face. The term [1+ (I 0 / Isat)] comes from the fact that the total current flowing through the crystal is practically the photocurrent generated by both beams (in contradistinction with the case of bright screening solitons, where the soliton beam is very narrow compared to the crystal width and thus does not affect the photocurrent , and this factor is equal to unity [15]). In Eq. 1, Δn0=-0.5n e3r33(V/L) is the electrooptic refractive indexchange, ne is the extraordinary refractive index, r 33 is the electrooptic tensor element, and (V/L) is the externally applied electric field. Incoherent MI is observed for a nonlinearity δn exceeding a certain threshold. When an external voltage is applied to the nonlinear crystal with a magnitude large enough to allow for MI, the homogeneous light distribution at the output face of the sample becomes periodically modulated and starts to form 1D filaments of incoherent light. In our experiments, the preferred direction of the stripes is perpendicular to the c-axis of the crystal. We believe that this is due to the existence of striations in our sample, which act as ‘initial noise’ that is eventually amplified by MI. These are index inhomogeneities in planes perpendicular to the c-axis that originate from melt composition changes during growth of the crystal. Another possible reason for the preferential 1D directionality might have to do with the anisotropy of the photorefractive nonlinearity. However, the final orientation of the stripes is rather random , with the largest observed angle of the inclination of the stripes relative to the c-axis being roughly 45 degrees. Figure 1 shows typical examples of MI of partially spatially incoherent light. Shown is the intensity of the signal beam in the output plane of the nonlinear crystal. The coherence length of the incoherent light is l c=17.5 µm and the intensity ratio I o/Isat=1. Figure 1(a) shows the output intensity without nonlinearity (V/L=0). The cases (b), (c), and (d) correspond to a value of the nonlinearity just below the threshold for 1D incoherent MI, at threshold, and just above the threshold. This shows beyond any doubt (1) the existence of incoherent MI, and (2) that incoherent MI occurs only when the nonlinear index change exceeds a well-defined threshold. In particular, Fig. 1(c) shows a mixed state exactly at threshold, in which order and disorder coexist. This is a clear indication that the nonlinear interaction undergoes an order-disorder phase transition. These phenomena were predicted in our theoretical paper [4]. But the experiments, as often happens in science, reveal new surprises. When the nonlinearity is further increased, a second threshold is reached: the filaments become unstable [Fig. 1(e)] and start to break into an ordered array of spots (2D filaments) as shown in Fig. 1(f). We emphasize that in all the pictures displayed in this figure, the correlation distance is much shorter than the distance between two adjacent stripes or filaments. Thus, this work is a clear demonstration that pattern can form also in weakly-correlated nonlinear multi-particle systems.Next, we study the dependence of the MI threshold on the coherence properties of the beam. For a constant intensity ratio I 0/Isat, the threshold where MI occurs depends on the incoherence of the light and on Δn0 (which we control through the applied voltage V). To identify the MI threshold experimentally, one needs to examine the growth dynamics of perturbations and observe whether they grow or decay. Obviously, this is very hard to measure, especially because the initial perturbations originate from random noise. Instead, we investigate the visibility (modulation depth) of the pattern observed at the output face of the crystal: random fluctuations that do not increase have a tiny (less than 5%) visibility, whereas the perturbations that grow emerge at high visibility (>50%) stripes. We have conducted numerous experiments with various degrees of coherence of the input beam, and measure the modulation depth of the output stripes as a function of the applied field (which is translated to Δn0). Figure 2(a) displays the results: it shows the modulation depth m = (I max-Imin)/(Imax+Imin) of the light at the output plane, as a function of Δn0 for different correlation distances lc and I o/Isat=1. For the case of a fully coherent input beam, m becomes large even at a vanishingly small nonlinearity. This is because coherent MI has no threshold. When the correlation distance is reduced, however, a well-defined threshold is observed: the jump from very low visibility to a large visibility is always abrupt, because for every beam with a finite lc there is always a threshold for MI. Clearly, the MI threshold shifts towards higher value of Δn0 with decreasing correlation distance lc. Once the nonlinearity exceeds the threshold for incoherent MI, the transverse frequencies that have gain grow exponentially and form the periodic patterns shown in Fig. 1. This growth leads to a large modulation depth (high visibility) in the output patterns, and, equally important, to a considerable deviation of these stripes from a pure sinusoidal shape, i.e., the propagation dynamics becomes highly nonlinear. Part of this dynamics was captured in the last figure in [4], by the appearance of the second spatial harmonic, yet the experiment provides considerably more insight into the nonlinear dynamical evolution of the patterns. Figure 2(b) shows typical intensity cross-sections of the stripes at the output plane. In this particular set of data , lc=17.5 µm and Δno values of 2.75*10-4 (i), 4.0*10-4 (ii), 5.0*10-4 (iii), and 8.0*10-4 (iv). At the lowest Δno value, MI is barely above threshold ( i). For the higher value at (ii), the modulation depth is higher yet the stripes have a sinusoidal shape. At the high value of (iii), theshape of the stripes is no longer sinusoidal and several higher harmonics participate. For an even higher nonlinearity, the spectrum becomes irregular (iv), and 2D breakup into filaments starts to occur. The periodicity (or the spatial frequency) of the 1D filaments that emerge in the MI process depends on the coherence properties of the beam and on the magnitude of the nonlinearity. In a saturable nonlinear medium, for a given intensity ratio, the spatial frequency should monotonically increase with increasing correlation distance and with increasing Δno [4]. We indeed observe this trend in our experiments. Figure 3(a) shows the dominating spatial frequency fmax (number of stripes per unit length) of the output intensity as a function of correlation distance lc for a constant intensity ratio I o/Isat=1 and three different values of Δno. The 1D incoherent MI theory, when applied to the nonlinearity of Eq. (1), with the parameters λ=514.5 nm, n e=2.3, r 33=260 pm/V, and assuming a Lorentzian-shaped angular power spectrum of the incoherent light, results in the plots shown in Fig. 3(b). Clearly, there is a good qualitative agreement between theory and experiments. The 1D incoherent MI theory also predicts the dependence of the dominating spatial frequency fmax on Δno, for a given correlation distance, as shown in Fig. 3(d). In this case, the experiments confirm the increase of fmax with increasing Δno, and shift towards higher Δno values that occurs for decreasing lc. However, experimentally, we observe (Fig. 3(c)) a turning point in the plots: the spatial frequency reaches a clear maximum and then goes down for increasing Δno. This is a new feature that was not predicted by the 1D theory. In fact, for Δno values larger than those of the peaks, the 1D stripes become irregular and start to break up into 2D filaments, and this leads to a decrease in the spatial frequency of the stripes. These new unexpected effects should be addressed in the context of a 2D incoherent MI theory. It is very possible that a 2D linearized MI analysis (similar to that of [4] but of a higher dimension) will not suffice to explain the breakup into an array of filaments, and will have to involve either heavy computation or a perturbative nonlinear treatment. Up to this point, the nonlinearity in our experiments had the form given in Eq. (1), which is not saturable. Based on the 1D incoherent MI theory [4], we expect that saturation of the optical nonlinearity should arrest the MI growth rate. To investigate saturation effects, we have modified the nature of our photorefractive screening nonlinearity in a rather easy way: by launching a "flat top" beamthat is narrower than the distance between the electrodes in our crystal, yet at the same time is wide enough to serve as a "quasi-uniform beam" at its flat-top. Since the beam is finite, it does not contribute to the total current flowing through the crystal at steady state. Hence, the nonlinearity is now δn = Δn0 [ I(r) / (I(r) + Isat ) ], which is the more commonly-used form of the photorefractive screening nonlinearity [15], and it has a saturable nature. When we launch such a beam in a biased crystal with Δn0 = 6*10- 4, and with a ratio between the peak intensity and the saturation intensity, I(0)/ Isat = 3, patterns form in several regions on the beam, as shown in Fig. 4. At the flat-top of the beam, low visibility stripes appear. In this region the nonlinearity is above threshold but in rather deep saturation, so the MI growth rate is suppressed. Then, at the margins of the beam, where the local ratio I(r) + Isat is around and slightly below unity, high-visibility stripes appear. In this region the nonlinearity is above threshold and at the same time it is not saturated, so the MI growth rate is large. Finally, at the far margins of the beam, the local nonlinearity is below threshold, because I(r) << Isat. A nice by-product of this particular experiment is the clear evidence (in Fig. 4) that the 1D stripes emerge at different orientations, and are not affected much by the local noise (striations). We expect that similar experiments with incoherent MI in the saturated regime and high nonlinearities that lead to 2D "lattices" of filaments (as shown in Fig. 1), will reveal a wealth of new features, because the "lattice" will now form features of varying order and varying scales in different regions of the beam. This seems to be a fascinating option and we are currently investigating it in our laboratory. Before closing, we would like to relate our nonlinear optical system to other nonlinear systems of weakly-correlated particles. Our prediction and experimental observation implies that in all such systems, patterns will form spontaneously, provided that the nonlinearity is larger than a threshold value, which in turn is set by the correlation distance. For example, we expect that 1D and 2D patterns will form in an atomic gas at temperatures slightly above the Bose -Einstein- Condensation temperature: at temperatures at which the atoms possess independent degrees of freedom (and cannot be described by a single wave function, as in the BEC state), yet they are still weakly correlated. At least for atoms with attractive collision forces (a negative scattering length), such patterns should form, depending on the dimensionality of the problem describing the atoms in the trap. The equation governing the evolution of the "mean field" of an atomic gas is the so-called Gross- Pitaevskiequation [17], which is literally identical to the nonlinear wave equation in nonlinear optics that gives rise to (1+1 )D Kerr solitons. However, to the best of our knowledge, no such ideas of pattern formation through modulation instability have been previously suggested previously for atomic gases [18]. Yet in other areas of physics, in fact, there are already at least some hints that such patterns do exist in disordered many-body nonlinear systems. To be specific, several experimental papers have reported a large anisotropy in the resistivity of a two-dimensional electron system with weak disorder [19]. The observed anisotropy is now attributed to the combination of nonlinear transport and weak disorder [20], which is exactly the transport-equivalent of an optical nonlinearity and incoherence in optical systems such as ours. The theoretical works predict the existence of 1D stripes (electron stripes) of charge density waves [20]. Spontaneous formation of stripes was also predicted and observed in high- Tc superconductors [21], which is again a nonlinear weakly-correlated many-body system. Finally, as we have already discussed in Ref. [4], spontaneously-forming patterns are also known in at least one system of classical particles: in a gravitational system. The spontaneous emergence of patterns in all of these diverse fields of science indicates that pattern formation in nonlinear weakly-correlated systems is a universal property. It is a gift of nature that in optics we can study it directly, visualizing every little detail of the physics involved, and at the same time, being able to isolate the underlying effects and develop a theory that captures the core effects that are indeed universal. Our hope is to be able to understand such patterns in a higher dimensionality, as we already observe them in our laboratory, and to draw new exciting implications to other fields of nature. In conclusion, we have presented the first experimental observation of modulation instability of spatially-incoherent light beams in a nonlinear optical system. We have proven that modulation instability occurs when the nonlinearity exceeds a sharp threshold. The MI threshold depends on the degree of incoherence, that is, the correlation distance, or the maximum distance between two points upon the beam that are still phase-correlated. We have shown that during the MI process a homogeneous input wave-front breaks into one-dimensional stripes. For a higher nonlinearity, we observe a second threshold at which the stripes become unstable and form (spontaneously) a spatially ordered pattern of two-dimensional filaments (spots).This work was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation, NSF, ARO, AFOSR, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.References (1) V. I. Bespalov and V. I. Talanov, JETP Lett. 3, 307 (1966); V. I. Karpman, JETP Lett. 6, 277 (1967); G. P. Agrawal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 880 (1987); S. Wabnitz, Phys. Rev. A 38, 2018 (1988). A. Hasegawa and W. F. Brinkman, J. Quant. Elect. 16, 694 (1980); K. Tai, A. Hasegawa and A. Tomita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 135 (1981).For a review on modulation instability in the temporal domain, see G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics , Second Ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1995), Chap. 5. (2) E. M. Dianov et al., Opt. Lett. 14, 1008 (1989); P. V. Mamyshev et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11, 1254 (1994); M. D. Iturbe-Castillo et al., Opt. Lett. 20, 1853 (1995); M. I. Carvalho, S. R. Singh, and D. N. Christodoulides, Opt. Comm. 126, 167 (1996). (3) For a recent review on optical spatial solitons, see G. I. Stegeman and M. Segev, Science 286, 1518 (1999). (4) M. Soljacic, M. Segev, T. Coskun, D. N. Christodoulides, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 467 (2000) (5) T. Coskun, D. N. Christodoulides, Y. Kim, Z. Chen, M. Soljacic and M. Segev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2374 (2000) (6) M. Mitchell, Z. Chen, M. Shih and M. Segev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 490 (1996); Z. Chen, M. Mitchell, M. Segev, T. H. Coskun and D. N. Christodoulides, Science 280, 889 (1998). (7) M. Mitchell and M. Segev, Nature, 387, 880 (1997). (8) D. N. Christodoulides T. H. Coskun, M. Mitchell and M. Segev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 646 (1997); ibid 80, 2310 (1998). (9) M. Mitchell, M. Segev, T. H. Coskun and D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4990 (1997); ibid 80, 5113 (1998) (10) A. W. Snyder and D. J. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1422 (1998) (11) V. V. Shkunov and D. Z. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2683 (1998) (12) N. Akhmediev, W. Krolikowski and A. W. Snyder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4632 (1998) (13) O. Bang, D. Edmundson, W. Krolikowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4740 (1999). (14) M. Mitchell, M. Segev and D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4657 (1998).(15) M. Segev, G. C. Valley, B. Crosignani, P. DiPorto and A. Yariv, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3211 (1994); D. N. Christodoulides and M. I. Carvalho, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 1628, (1995); M. Segev, M. Shih and G. C. Valley, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 13, 706 (1996). (16) M. Shih, M. Segev, G. C. Valley, G. Salamo, B. Crosignani and P. DiPorto, Elect. Lett. 31, 826 (1995); Opt. Lett. 21, 324 (1996). (17) See, e.g., Th. Busch and J. R. Anglin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2298 (2000). (18) Prof. Jean Dalibard, Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris, France, Private Communication. (19) M. P. Lilly, K. B. Cooper, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 394 (1999); ibid 83, 824 (1999); W. Pan, R. R. Du, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, ibid, 83, 820 (1999); M. Shayegan and H. C. Manoharan, preprint [cond-mat/9903405] (1999). (20) A. A. Koulakov, M. M. Fogler, aand B. I. Shklovskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 499 (1996); A. H. MacDonald and M. P. A. Fisher, preprint [cond-mat/9907278], to appear in Phys. Rev. B, (2000); H. MacDonald and M. P. A. Fisher, preprint [cond-mat/0001021] (2000). (21) See V. J. Emery et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8814 (1999) and references therein.Figures Fig. 1. The intensity structure of a partially-spatially-incoherent beam at the output plane of the nonlinear crystal. The sample is illuminated homogeneously with partially spatially incoherent light with a coherence length l c=17.5 µm. The displayed area is 1.0 ×1.0mm2 (a-d) and 0.8 ×0.8mm2 (e,f), respectively. The size of the nonlinear refractive index change of the crystal is successively increased from (a) Δn0=0 (the linear case), to (b) 3.5*10-4 , (c) 4.0*10-4, (d) 4.5*10-4, (e) 9*10-4 (e), and (f) 1*10-3. The plots (b-d) show the cases just below threshold (no features), at threshold (partial features), and just above threshold (features everywhere) for 1D incoherent MI that leads to 1D filaments. Far above this threshold, at a much higher value of the nonlinearity, the 1D filaments become unstable (e), and finally become ordered in a regular two-dimensional pattern (f).Fig. 2. Threshold dependence of incoherent MI: modulation m=(I max-Imin)/(Imax+Imin) of the light pattern vs. size of the nonlinearity Δno for different correlation distances lc and an intensity ratio Io/Isat=1. a) measured values of m for l c=8, 10, and 17.5 µm and for coherent light ( lc → ∞). The dotted curves are guides for the eye. b) intensity cross-sections of the stripes for l c=17.5 µm and a nonlinear refractive index change of Δno=2.75*10-4 (i), 4.0*10-4 (ii), 5.0*10-4 (iii), and 8.0*10-4 (iv). The dotted lines indicate the base line of the respective profile. The stripes emerge as sinusoidal stripes (for nonlinearity just above threshold), and turn into square-wave stripes at a higher nonlinearity, and eventually break up into filaments at a large enough nonlinearity.Fig. 3. The dominating spatial frequency fmax (number of stripes per unit length) of the output intensity as a function of correlation distance lc (a, experiment; b, theory) and nonlinear refractive index change (c, experiment; d, theory). All measured spatial frequencies are for an experimental parameter range where the 1D filaments are stable and 2D instability is not yet visible. The theoretical curves in (b) and (d) are deduced form the 1D model described in [4] using the nonlinearity of Eq. 1 and λ=514.5 nm, n e=2.3, and r 33=260 pm/V. The dotted curves in (a) and (c) are guides for the eye.Fig. 4. Suppression of incoherent MI due to saturation of the nonlinearity. The intensity structure of a finite signal beam (gaussian beam with a width (FWHM) of 1 mm) at the output plane of the crystal. The intensity ratio (peak of beam to background/saturation intensity) is I 0/Isat=3. Without nonlinearity ( Δn0=0), the output beam shows no features. The photograph is taken for Δn0=6*10- 4. The saturation nature of the nonlinearity clearly suppresses MI in the center of the beam, whereas strong modulation and filaments of random orientation occur in the margins of the beam.

arXiv:physics/0005084v1 [physics.class-ph] 31 May 2000A gentle introduction into the foundations of classical electrodynamics: Meaning of the excitations (D,H) and the field strengths (E, B) Friedrich W. Hehl∗ Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Cologne 50923 K¨ oln, Germany and Yuri N. Obukhov† Department of Theoretical Physics Moscow State University 117234 Moscow, Russia Abstract Coulomb comes in quanta, weber may come in quanta. – We will base classi- cal electrodynamics on electric charge conservation, the L orentz force, and on magnetic flux conservation. This yields the Maxwell equatio ns. The conse- quences will be drawn for the interpretation and the dimensi on of the electric and magnetic fields. ∗Email: hehl@thp.uni-koeln.de †Email: general@elnet.msk.ru 1I. INTRODUCTION In Cologne, we teach the course on Theoretical Physics II (el ectrodynamics) to students of physics in their fourth semester. Since several years, we are using for that purpose the calculus of exterior differential forms, see [1,2], because we believe that this is the appropriate formalism: It is based on objects with possess a clear operat ional interpretation, it elucidates the fundamental structure of Maxwell’s equations and their mutual interrelationship, and it invites to a 4-dimensional representation appropriate f or special andgeneral relativity theory (i.e., including gravity, see [3,4]). Our experimental colleagues are somewhat skeptical; and no t only them. Therefore we were invited to give, within 90 minutes, a sort of a popular su rvey of electrodynamics in exterior calculus to the members of one of our experimental i nstitutes (group of H. Micklitz). The present article is a worked-out version of this talk. We b elieve that it could also be useful for other universities. This talk was given on 10 May 2000. The next day we received the new May issue of the American Journal of Physics. And there we found the highl y interesting and historically oriented article of Roche [5] on “ BandH, the intensity vectors of magnetism. . . ”. Therein, the corresponding work of Bamberg and Sternberg [6], Bopp [7 ], Ingarden and Jamio/suppress lkowski [8], Post [9], Sommerfeld [10], and Truesdell and Toupin [11 ], to drop just a few names, was totally neglected yielding a picture of HandBwhich looks to us as being out of date; one should also compare in this context the letter of Chamber s [12]. Below we will suggest answers to some of Roche’s questions. Moreover, “...any system that gives EandBdifferent units, when they are related through a relativistic transformation, is on the far side of sanity” is an apodictic statement of Fitch in this journal [13]. In the sequel, we will prove tha t weareon the far side of sanity: Theabsolute dimension of Eturns out to be magnetic flux/time and that of Bmagnetic flux, see Sec. IV. According to the audience we want to address, we will skip all mathematical details and 2take recourse to plausibility considerations. In order to m ake the paper self-contained, we present though a brief summary of exterior calculus in the Ap pendix. A good reference to the mathematics underlying our presentation is the book of F rankel [14], see also [6] and [15]. For the experimental side of our subject we refer to Ber gmann-Schaefer [16]. As a preview, let us collect essential information about the electromagnetic field In Table I. The explanations will follow below. It was Maxwell himself who advised us to be very careful in ass igning a certain physical quantity to a mathematical object. As it turns out, the mathe matical images of D,H, E, B are all different from each other. This is well encoded in Scho uten’s images of the electro- magnetic field, see [15] p. 133. II. ELECTRIC CHARGE CONSERVATION The conservation of electric charge was already recognized as fundamental law during the time of Franklin (around 1750) well before Coulomb disco vered his force law in 1785. Nowadays, at a time, at which one can catch single electrons a nd single protons and their antiparticles in traps and can count them individually, we are more sure than ever that electric charge conservation is a valid fundamental law of n ature. Therefore matter carries as aprimary quality something called electric charge which only occurs in posit ive or negative units of an elementary charge e(or, in the case of quarks, of 1 /3th of it) and which can be counted. Thus it is justified to introduce the physical dimen sion of charge qas a new and independent concept. Ideally one should measure a charge in units of e/3. However, for practical reasons, the SI-unit C (coulomb) is used in labora tory physics. Let us start with the 3-dimensional Euclidean space in which we mark a 3-dimensional domain V. Hereafter, the local coordinates in this space will be deno ted by xaand the time byt, with the basis vectors ea:=∂aanda, b, . . . = 1,2,3. The total charge in the domain Vis given by the integral 3Q=/integraldisplay Vρ , (2.1) where the electric charge density ρis the 3-form ρ=1 3!ρabcdxa∧dxb∧dxc=ρ123dx1∧dx2∧ dx3. Here summation is understood over the indices a, b, c andρabc=−ρbac=ρbca=. . ., i.e., the components ρabcof the charge density 3-form ρare antisymmetric under the exchange of two indices, leaving only one independent component ρ123. The wedge ∧denotes the (anticommutative) exterior product of two forms, and dx1∧dx2∧dx3represents the volume “element”. For our present purpose it is enough to know, for m ore details see the Appendix, that a 3-form (a p-form) is an object that, if integrated over a 3-dimensional (p-dimensional) domain, yields a scalar quantity, here the charge Q. The dimension of Qis [Q] =q. Since an integral (a summation after all) cannot change the dimension, the dimension of the charge density 3-form an d its components are, respec- tively, [ ρ] =q, and [ ρabc] =q/ℓ3, with ℓ= length. In general, the elementary charges are not at rest. The elect ric current Jflowing across a 2-dimensional surface Sis given by the integral J=/integraldisplay Sj . (2.2) Accordingly, the electric current density jturns out to be a 2-form: j=1 2!jabdxa∧dxb= j12dx1∧dx2+j13dx1∧dx3+j23dx2∧dx3, with jab=−jba. Ift= time, then the dimensions of the current integral and the current 2-form and its compon ents are [ J] = [j] =q/tand [jab] =q/(t ℓ2), respectively. If we use the abbreviation ∂t:=∂/∂t, theglobal electric charge conservation can be expressed as ∂t/integraldisplay Vρ+/integraldisplay ∂Vj= 0 (Axiom 1) , (2.3) where the surface integral is evaluated over the (closed and 2-dimensional) boundary of V, which we denote by ∂V. The change per time interval of the charge contained in Vis balanced by the flow of the electric current through the bound ary of the domain. 4The closed surface integral/integraltext ∂Vjcan be transformed into a volume integral/integraltext Vd jby Stokes’s theorem (9.4). Here ddenotes the exterior derivative that increases the rank of a form by one, i.e. d jis a 3-form. Thus (2.3) translates into /integraldisplay V(∂tρ+d j) = 0. (2.4) Since this is valid for an arbitrary domain, we arrive at the local form of electric charge conservation, d j+∂tρ= 0. (2.5) III. EXCITATIONS Since the charge density ρis a 3-form, its exterior derivative vanishes: d ρ= 0. Then, by a theorem of de Rham, it follows that ρcan be derived from a “potential”: dρ= 0 = ⇒ ρ=dD. (3.1) In this way one finds the electric excitation 2-form D. Its absolute dimension is [ D] = [ρ] =q, furthermore, for the components, [ Dab] = [D]/ℓ2=q/ℓ2. Substituting (3.1) 2into charge conservation (2.5) and once again using the de Rh am theorem, we find another “potential” for the current density : d(j+∂tD) = 0 = ⇒ j+∂tD=dH. (3.2) The magnetic excitation Hturns out to be a 1-form. Its dimension is [ H] = [ j] = q/t , [Ha] =q/(t ℓ). Consequently, the excitations ( D,H) are potentials of the sources ( ρ, j). All these (ad- ditive) quantities (How much?) are described by odd differential forms. In this way, we find the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations (the Gauss law and the Oersted-Amp` ere law): 5dD=ρ , (3.3) dH −∂tD=j . (3.4) Since electric charge conservation is valid in microphysic s, the corresponding Maxwell equa- tions (3.3) and (3.4) are also microphysical equations, and with them the excitations Dand Hare microphysical quantities likewise – in contrast to what is stated in most textbooks. Before we ever talked about forces on charges, charge conservation alone gave us the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations including the appropriat e dimensions for the excitations DandH. Under the assumption that Dvanishes inside an ideal electric conductor, one can get rid of the indeterminacy of Dwhich is inherent in the definition of the excitation as a “pot ential” of the charge density, and we can measure Dby means of two identical conducting plates (“Maxwellian double plates”) which touch each other and whi ch are separated in the D- field to be measured. The charge on one plate is then measured. Analogously, Hcan be measured by the Gauss compensation method or by a supercondu ctor and the Meissner effect (B= 0→ H = 0). Accordingly, the excitations do have a direct operational significance. IV. FIELD STRENGTHS So far, conserved charge was the notion at center stage. Now energy enters the scene, which opens the way for introducing the electromagnetic fiel d strengths. Whereas the exci- tations ( D,H) are linked to (and measured by) the charge and the current ( ρ, j), the electric and magnetic field strengths are usually introduced as force s acting on unit charges at rest or in motion, respectively. Let us consider a point particle with electric charge eand velocity vector v. The force Facting on it is a 1-form since its (1-dimensional) line integ ral yields a scalar, namely the energy. Thus Fcarries the absolute dimension of an energy or of action over time: [F] = energy = h/t, where hdenotes the dimension of an action. Accordingly, the local components Faof the force F=Fadxapossess the dimension [ Fa] =h/(t ℓ) = force. 6In an electromagnetic field, the motion of a test particle is g overned by the Lorentz force: F=e(E−v⌋B) (Axiom 2) . (4.1) The symbol ⌋denotes the interior product of a vector (here the velocity v ector) with a p-form. It decreases the rank of a form by 1 (see the Appendix), and since v⌋Bis to be a 1-form, then Bis a 2-form. Newly introduced by (4.1) are the electric field s trength 1-form Eand the magnetic field strength 2-form B. They are both intensities (How strong?). The dimension of the velocity is [ v] = 1/t. With the decomposition v=va∂a, we find for its components [ va] =ℓ/t. Then it is straightforward to read off from (4.1) the absolut e dimension of the electric field strength [ E] =h/(t q) =φ0/t, with φ0:=h/q. For its components we have [ Ea] =φ0/(t ℓ). Analogously, for the dimension of the magnetic field strength we find [ B] = (h/t)/(q/t) =h/q=φ0and [Bab] =φ0/ℓ2, respectively. The field B carries the dimension of a magnetic flux φ0. In superconductors, magnetic flux can come in quantized flux tubes, so-called fluxoids , underlining the importance of the notion of magnetic flux. The definition (4.1) of the field strengths makes only sense, i f the charge of the test particle is conserved. In other words, axiom 2 presupposes a xiom 1 and should not be seen as a stand alone pillar of electrodynamics. V. MAGNETIC FLUX CONSERVATION Taking into account the rank (as exterior forms) of the field s trengths, the only integral we can build up from EandB, respectively, are line integrals and surface integrals/integraltext lineE and/integraltext surfaceB. Apart from a factor t, the dimensions are equal. Hence, from a dimensional point of view, it seems sensible to postulate the conservati on theorem, ∂t/integraldisplay SB+/integraldisplay ∂SE= 0 (Axiom 3) . (5.1) Magnetic flux conservation (5.1) has to be seen as an analog of electric charge conservation (2.3). Magnetic flux, though, is related to a 2-dimensional s urface whereas electric charge 7is related to a 3-dimensional volume. Thus the integration d omains in the conservation theorems (5.1) and (2.3) differ by one spatial dimension alwa ys. Axiom 3 gains immediate evidence from the dynamics of an Abri kosov flux line lattice in a superconductor. There the quantized flux lines can be cou nted, they don’t vanish nor are they created from nothing, rather they move in and out cro ssing the boundary ∂Sof the surface Sunder consideration. Again, by means of Stokes’s theorem (9.4), we can transform t he boundary integral: /integraltext ∂SE=/integraltext Sd E. Taking into account the arbitrariness of the surface S, we recover Faraday’s induction law d E+∂tB= 0, (5.2) which is experimentally very well established. We different iate Faraday’s law by means of d and find ∂t(d B) = 0. Since an integration constant other than zero is sensel ess (recall the relativity principle), we have d B= 0. (5.3) Thehomogeneous Maxwell equations (5.2) and (5.3) (Faraday’s induction law and the c losure of the magnetic field strength) nearly complete the construc tion of the theory. We find the 3 + 3 time evolution equations (3.4) and (5.2) for th e electromagnetic field (D,H;E, B), i.e., for 6 + 6 components. Before we can find solutions of th ese equations, we have to reduce the number of variables to 6, i.e., we have to cut them in half. Such a reduction is achieved by Axiom 4 which establishes the const itutive laws D=D(E, B) and H=H(E, B). VI. CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS FOR THE VACUUM In general, the constitutive law gives a nonlinear (and, mor eover, nonlocal) relation between the excitations and the field strengths, depending o n the structure and the motion 8of the material medium, see [4]. “It should be needless to rem ark that while from the mathematical standpoint a constitutive equation is a postu late or a definition, the first guide is physical experience, perhaps fortified by experime ntal data” [17]. The matter-free space is usually called vacuum (or aether, i n the old terminology). Ex- perience tells us that, for vacuum, we should have the linear relations between the (additive) quantities and the intensities [18]: D=ε0⋆E and H=1 µ0⋆B. (6.1) The proportionality coefficients ε0, µ0encode all the essential information about the electric and magnetic properties of the vacuum. The Hodge star operat or⋆is needed, since we have to map a 1-form into a 2-form and vice versa or, more generally , ak-form into a (3 −k)-form. Then the operator ⋆in (6.1) has the dimension of a length or its reciprocal. Note that the Hodge star depends on the metric of our Euclidean space. Reca lling the dimensions of the excitations and the field strengths, we find the dimensions of the vacuum permittivity and the vacuum permeability as [ε0] =qt φ0ℓ=1 cΩ0and [ µ0] =φ0t qℓ=Ω0 c, (6.2) respectively. Here we define Ω 0:= Φ 0/q=h/q2and velocity c:=ℓ/t. Dimensionwise, it is clearly visible that /bracketleftBigg1√ε0µ0/bracketrightBigg =c , and/bracketleftBigg/radicalBiggµ0 ε0/bracketrightBigg = Ω0. (6.3) Obviously, the velocity cand the resistance Ω 0are constants of nature, the velocity of light cbeing a universal one, whereas Ω 0, the wave resistance of the vacuum [19], refers only to electromagnetic properties. Note that 1 /Ω0plays the role of the coupling constant which enters as a factor into the free field Maxwell Lagrangian. VII. SI-UNITS The fundamental dimensions in the SI-system for mechanics a nd electrodynamics are (ℓ, t, M, q/t ), with Mas mass. And for each of those a unit was defined. However, sinc e 9action – we denote its dimension by h– is a relativistic invariant quantity and since the electric charge is more fundamental than the electric curre nt, we rather choose as the basic units (ℓ, t, h, q ), (7.1) see Schouten [15] and Post [9]. Thus, instead of the kilogram and the ampere, we choose joule×second (or weber ×coulomb) and the coulomb: (m, s, Wb ×C, C). (7.2) Numerically, in the SI-system, one puts (for historical rea sons) µ0= 4π×10−7Wbs C m(permeability of the vacuum) . (7.3) Then measurements ` a la Weber-Kohlrausch yield ε0= 8.85×10−12C s Wbm(permittivity of the vacuum) . (7.4) The SI-units of the electromagnetic field are collected in Ta ble II. VIII. ELECTRODYNAMICS IN MATTER In a great number of the texts on electrodynamics the electri c and magnetic properties of media are described following the macroscopic averaging scheme of Lorentz (1916). However, this formalism has a number of serious limitations, see the r elevant criticism in [20], e.g.. Here we follow a consistent microscopic approach to the electrodynamics in media, cf. [20]. The total charge or current density is the sum of the two contributions originating “from the inside” and “from the outside” of the medium: ρ=ρmat+ρext, j =jmat+jext. (8.1) Hereafter, the bound charge [21] in matter is denoted by matand the external charge [22] by ext. The same notational scheme is also applied to the current an d the excitations. Bound 10charge and bound current are inherent characteristics of ma tter determined by the medium itself. They vanish outside the medium. In contrast, extern al charge and external current in general do not vanish outside matter. They can be prepared fo r a specific purpose (such as the scattering of a current of particles by a medium or a study of the reaction of a medium in response to a prescribed configuration of charges and curr ents). We assume that the charge bound by matter fulfills the usual co nservation law: d jmat+∂tρmat= 0. (8.2) Taking into account (2.5), this means that there is no physic al exchange (or conversion) between the bound and the external charges. As a consequence of this assumption, we can repeat the arguments of Sec.III that will give rise to the cor responding excitations Dmatand Hmatas “potentials” for the bound charge and the bound current. T he conventional names for these newly introduced excitations are polarization Pand magnetization M, i.e., Dmat≡ −P , Hmat≡M . (8.3) The minus sign is conventional, see Kovetz [23]. Thus, in ana logy to the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations, we find −d P=ρmat, d M +∂tP=jmat. (8.4) The identifications (8.3) are only true up to an exact form. Ho wever, if we requires Dmat= 0 forE= 0 and Hmat= 0 for B= 0, as we will do in (8.8), uniqueness is guaranteed. The Maxwell equations are linear partial differential equations. Therefore we can define Dext:=D − Dmat=D+P , Hext:=H − Hmat=H −M . (8.5) The external excitations ( Dext,Hext) can be understood as auxiliary quantities. In terms of these quantities, the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations for matter finally read: dDext=ρext,Dext=ε0⋆E+P(E), (8.6) dHext−∂tDext=jext,Hext=1 µ0⋆B−M(B). (8.7) 11The system (8.6,8.7) look similar to (3.3,3.4). However, th ese equations refer only to the external fields and sources. In the simplest cases, we have the linear constitutive laws P=ε0χE⋆E , M =1 µ0χB⋆B , (8.8) with the electric and magnetic [24] susceptibilities ( χE, χB). With material constants ε:=ε0(1 +χE), µ :=µ0 1−χB, (8.9) one can rewrite the material laws (8.8) as Dext=ε⋆E , Hext=1 µ⋆B . (8.10) For the discussion of the concrete applications of the devel oped microscopic theory in modern condensed matter physics, we refer to the review of Hi rst [20]. IX. CONCLUSION The Maxwell equations dD=ρ , d H −∂tD=j , (9.1) d B= 0, d E +∂tB= 0, (9.2) are the cornerstones of any classical theory of electromagn etism. As an expression of charge and flux conservation, they carry a high degree of plausibili ty as well as solid experimental support. The Maxwell equations in this form remain valid in a n accelerated reference frame and in a gravitational field likewise, without any change. The constitutive equations for the vacuum D=1 cΩ0⋆E and H=c Ω0⋆B (9.3) are necessary for making the Maxwellian system to a predicti ve physical theory. They depend, via the star operator, on the metric of space and are, accordingly, influenced by 12the gravitational field. They are valid in very good approxim ation, but there are exceptions known (if the Casimir effect is to be described). For the description of matter, the sources ( ρ, j) have to be split suitably in order to derive, from the microscopic equations (9.1) and (9.2), app ropriate macroscopic expressions. Summing up, we can give an answer to one of the central questio ns posed by Roche [5]: The need for the different notations and different dimensions and units for the excitation Hand the field strength B(and, similarly, for DandE) is well substantiated by the very different geometrical properties and physical origins of these fields , see Table I and Schouten [15] p. 133. Even in vacuum, these differences do notdisappear. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to H. Micklitz (Cologne) for arranging this l ecture. One of the authors (FWH) would like to thank W. Raith (Berlin-Bielefeld) for an extended exchange of letters on the fundamental structure of Maxwell’s theory. Moreover , he is grateful to R.G. Chambers (Bristol) and S. Scheidl (Cologne) for useful remarks. APPENDIX: THE ABC OF EXTERIOR CALCULUS The formalism of exterior differential forms is widely used i n different domains of math- ematics and theoretical physics. In particular, in electro magnetic theory, exterior calculus offers an elegant and transparent framework for the introduc tion of the basic notions and for the formulation of the corresponding laws. Here, we give a very elementary description of the objects and operations used above. Given the set of the local coordinates {xa}, the vectors ea=∂arepresent a basis of the tangent vector space at a point of the manifold. The symbol dxadenotes the set of the linear 1-forms dual to the coordinate vector basis, dxa(eb) =δa b. An arbitrary k-form ωcan be described, in local coordinates, by its components: ω=1 k!ωa1...akdxa1∧. . .∧dxak. 13It is common to say that the exterior product “∧” generalizes the vector product. How- ever, one should be careful with such statements, because th e vector product in the stan- dard 3-dimensional analysis is, strictly speaking, a super position of the wedge product and of the Hodge duality operator. Thus, the vector product nece ssarily involves the metric on the manifold. In contrast, the exterior product is a pre-metric operation, although it resembles the vector product. For example, the exterior pro duct of the two 1-forms ω andϕwith the components ωaandϕayields a 2-form ω∧ϕwith the local components {(ω2ϕ3−ω3ϕ2),(ω3ϕ1−ω1ϕ3),(ω1ϕ2−ω2ϕ1)}. Theexterior differential dmaps a k-form to a ( k+ 1)-form. It is most easily described in the local coordinates: the exterior differential of a k-form ω=1 k!ωa1...akdxa1∧. . .∧dxak increases its rank and yields the ( k+ 1)-form dω=1 (k+1)!/parenleftBig ∂[a1ωa1...ak+1]/parenrightBig dxa1∧. . .∧dxak+1. Thus, dnaturally generalizes the “grad” operator which leads from a scalar to a vector and, at the same time, it represents a pre-metric extension of the “curl” operator. Conversely, one can define an operation which decreases the r ank of a form by 1. This is theinterior product of a vector with a k-form. Given the vector vwith the components va, the interior product with the coframe 1-form yields v⌋dxa=va, which is a sort of a projection along v. By linearity, the interior product of vwith the k-form ω=1 k!ωa1...akdxa1∧. . .∧dxak yields a ( k−1)-form v⌋ω=1 (k−1)!vaωaa1...ak−1dxa1∧. . .∧dxak−1. The notions of the oddandeven exterior forms are closely related to the orientation of the manifold. In simple terms, these two types of forms are di stinguished by their different behavior with respect to a reflection (i.e., a change of orien tation): an even (odd) form does not change (changes) sign under a reflection transformation . These properties of odd and even forms are crucial in the integration theory, see, e.g., [14]. For a k-form an integral over a k-dimensional surface is defined. We will not enter into the details here, limiting ourselves to the formulation of t he Stokes’s theorem which occupies the central place in the integration theory: /integraldisplay ∂Cω=/integraldisplay Cd ω. (9.4) 14Hereωis an arbitrary k-form, and Cis an arbitrary ( k+ 1)-dimensional (hyper)surface. For a deeper and a more rigorous introduction into the exteri or calculus, see, e.g., [6,14]. 15REFERENCES [1] F.W. Hehl and Yu.N. Obukhov, Electric Charge and Magnetic Flux: On the Structure of Classical Electrodynamics. Tex-script of 230 pages. March 1999 (unpublished). [2] M.R. Zirnbauer, Elektrodynamik. Tex-script of a course in Theoretical Physics II (in German), July 1998 (Springer, Berlin, to be published). [3] Yu.N. Obukhov and F.W. Hehl, Space-time metric from linear electrodynamics ,Phys. Lett.B458 (1999) 466-470. [4] F.W. Hehl and Yu.N. Obukhov, How does the electromagnetic field couple to gravity, in particular to metric, nonmetricity, torsion, and curvatur e?Preprint IASSNS-HEP-99- 116, Inst. for Adv. Study, Princeton, see also http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0001010 . [5] J.J. Roche, B and H, the intensity vectors of magnetism: A new approach to resolving a century-old controversy ,Am. J. Phys. 68(2000) 438-449. [6] P. Bamberg and S. Sternberg, A Course in Mathematics for Students of Physics. Vol.2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990). [7] F. Bopp, Prinzipien der Elektrodynamik ,Z. Physik 169(1962) 45-52. [8] R. Ingarden and A. Jamio/suppress lkowski, Classical Electrodynamics (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1985). [9] E.J. Post, Formal Structure of Electromagnetics – General Covariance and Electromag- netics. North Holland, Amsterdam (1962) and Dover, Mineola , New York (1997). [10] A. Sommerfeld, Elektrodynamik. Vorlesungen ¨ uber Theoretische Physik, Band 3. Di- etrisch’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Wiesbaden (1948). [11] C. Truesdell and R.A. Toupin, The Classical Field Theories . InHandbuch der Physik, Vol. III/1, S. Fl¨ ugge ed.. Springer, Berlin (1960) pp. 226- 793. [12] R.G. Chambers, Units — B, H, D , and E,Am. J. Phys. 67(1999) 468-469. 16[13] V.L. Fitch, The far side of sanity ,Am. J. Phys. 67(1999) 467. [14] T. Frankel, The Geometry of Physics – An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). Now also available as paperback. [15] J. A. Schouten, Tensor Analysis for Physicists , 2nd ed.. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1954) and Dover, Mineola, New York (1989). [16] W. Raith, Bergmann-Schaefer, Lehrbuch der Experimentalphysik, Vol .2, Elektromag- netismus , 8th ed.. de Gruyter, Berlin (1999). [17] See [11] p. 700. [18] Alternatively, between the extensive and the intensiv e quantities. In electrodynamics, the distinction between these two types of quantities goes b ack to Mie. He also suggested the name excitation (in German: Erregung) for DandH, see G. Mie: Lehrbuch der Elektrizit¨ at und des Magnetismus. 3rd ed.. Enke, Stuttgart (1948). [19] 1/Ω0is also sometimes called the admittance of free space, see, f or instance, [9] p. 184. [20] L.L. Hirst, The microscopic magnetization: concept and application ,Rev. Mod. Phys. 69(1997) 607-627. [21] Also called polarization charge. [22] Also called free, true, or real charge. [23] A. Kovetz, Electromagnetic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2000). [24] In older texts, the magnetization Mwas usually expressed in terms of H, namely M= χHH. For reasons of relativistic invariance, this is inappropr iate, provided we start with P=ε0χE⋆E, as we do in (8.8) 2. Note that µ=µ0(1 +χH). 17TABLES Table I. The electromagnetic field Field name math. independent related reflec- absolute object components to tion dimension D electric oddD23,D31,D12area −Dq= electric excitation 2-form charge H magnetic odd H1,H2,H3line −H q/t excitation 1-form E electric even E1, E2, E3line E Φ0/t field strength 1-form B magnetic even B23, B31, B12area B Φ0= mag- field strength 2-form netic flux Table II. SI-units of the electromagnetic field. Field SI-unit of field SI-unit of components of field D C C/m2 H A=C/s A/m =C/(sm) (→oersted) E Wb/s =V V/m =Wb/(sm) B Wb Wb/m2= tesla = T(→gauss) 18

arXiv:physics/0006001v1 [physics.acc-ph] 1 Jun 2000Presentedat e+e−Factories 1999, Sept. 21-24, 1999, KEKLaboratory CBN 99-30 Beam-GeneratedDetector Backgrounds atCESR∗ Stuart Henderson†, LaboratoryofNuclearStudies, CornellUniversity,Ithac a NY,14853,USA DavidCinabro, WayneStateUniversity,DetroitMI, 48202,U SA Abstract The CESR/CLEO Phase II interaction region is described. The operational experience with beam-generated detector backgrounds is reviewed. The status of our understand- ing of beam-generated detector backgrounds at CESR is described and comparisons of background measurements with simulationpredictionsarepresented. 1 INTRODUCTION A newCESR/CLEO interactionregion[1, 2] was installed in1995aspartoftheCESRPhaseIIupgrade. At thesame timetheCLEOexperiment[3]installedasiliconvertexde- tector (SVX) around a 2 cm radius beryllium beampipe, and new detector shielding. (The new configurationof the CLEO detector is referred to as CLEO II.V[4]) The use of radiation sensitive SVX readout electronics located jus t outside the central beampipe placed a premium on accu- rate predictionandunderstandingofbeam-relateddetecto r backgrounds at CESR. This article describes the detector shielding system, commissioning and operational experi- enceandpresentsastatusreportonourpresentunderstand- ingofbeam-generateddetectorbackgroundsat CESR. TheCESRPhaseIIinterationregion(IR)wasoptimized forbunchtraincollisionsata smallhorizontalcrossingan - gle (see [5] in these proceedings). CESR presently oper- ates with 9 trains of bunches, each of which consists of 4 bunches spaced by 14 ns. The peak stored beam current to date is 550 mA with nearly equal electron and positron beamcurrents. The dominant CLEO detector background arises from lostparticlesgeneratedbybremsstrahlunginteractionsw ith the residual gas within about 30 m of the IP. Coulomb scattering is a small contribution as is the dose from scat- tered synchrotronradiation. The CLEO experimentis sen- sitive to beam-generated backgrounds through the follow- ing mechanisms: i) background hits (detector occupancy) in the drift chambers, ii) background hits (occupancy) in the SVX, iii) radiation dose to the SVX readout electron- ics, iv) radiation dose to the CsI crystal calorimeter and v) increased data-acquisition trigger rates. It turns out that the radiation sensitivity of the silicon readout elec- tronics (CAMEX amplifiers) placed the most stringent re- quirementsonthemaximumtolerabledetectorbackground rates. Radiation damage studies [6] found that the fail- ∗Work supported by the National Science Foundation. †Email: sdh9@cornell.eduure dose for the powered CAMEX amplifiers is ∼25 krad (∼100kradunpowered). Fordetectorshieldingdesignpur- poseswe chosethe followingdesigncriteria: i) SVX layer 1 occupancy <1%hits/strip/ µs, andii) SVX readoutelec- tronicsdose <20kradin3years. 2 CESR PHASEIIINTERACTION REGION 2.1 DesignConsiderations The crossing angle orbit has important consequences for synchrotronradiationbackgrounds. The incomingbeamis off-axis in the interaction region quadrupoles, perhaps by as much as 1 cm, generating substantial SR power only a few meters from the IP. This source alone would lead to unacceptablylargedetectorbackgrounds. Inordertobring the incoming beam nearer the axis of the nearest horizon- tally focusing quadrupole, the beam is displaced horizon- tally with a magnetic IP displacement bump. This bump wasincludedinthelatticedesignphasetoensureadequate aperture. Withtheuseofthisbump,SRpowersarereduced andwith propershieldingthe backgroundratesare accept- able. Inaddition,forinjectionthebeamsareseparatedhor - izontally at the IP, again placing one beam off-axis in the IR quads and producing higher SR fluxes during injection thanHEP. The detector background shielding system was de- signed based on the results of detector background simu- lations which were developed for lost particles and syn- chrotron radiation. These simulations are described in detail elsewhere[2, 7]. The results of these simulations were comparedto detectorbackgroundmeasurementsper- formed with CLEO-II and were found to be in very good agreement providing confidence in their predictive power [8,9,10, 7]. 2.2 DetectorShielding The detector shielding consists of two parts. The detec- tor is shielded from lost beam particles by a large tung- stenmaskapproximately2.5cmthickextendingfrom ∼24 cm to ∼50 cm from the IP. In addition, the rare-earth permanentmagnetquadrupolematerialprovidesadditional shieldingoutboardofthe tungstenmask. Tungstenwasse- lected as the mask material because of its short radiation length. The detailed shape was designed based on the re- sults of Monte-Carlo simulations of beam-gas scattering.The detector is shielded from synchrotron radiation by a stepped copper mask. The innermost mask tip is located atr= 1.2cm and z= 26cm. The mask is profiled in such a way that SR photons strike only the tips of the mask structure; the surfaces parallel to the beam direction are angled slightly so that these surfaces intercept no SR flux that would otherwise forward scatter into the detector beampipe. As a result, all incoming SR power is absorbed on the tips. Rather than make these tip surfaces at right angles to the beam direction, the surfaces are sloped to re- ducetheHOMpowergeneratedinthestructure. Theslope issmallenoughthatthetipsurfacesremainhiddenfromthe detector beampipe. Thus, the background from SR arises fromphotonswhichscatterthroughamasktip(“tipscatter- ing”) and photonswhich pass over the innermost mask tip and strike the downstream surface of the mask and subse- quentlyscatter intothebeampipe(“backscattering”). The central detector beampipe [11] is a double-walled watercooledberylliumbeampipewithinnerradius r= 1.9 cm. To further reduce the SR backgrounds a 10µm gold coating was deposited [12] on the inner surface of the beampipe. The coating reduces the radiation dose to the SVX detector by 3-4 orders of magnitude. To further re- ducethelostparticlebackgroundtheinnermostmasktipis madeoftantalumratherthancopper. Sinceduringinjection one of the beams is off-axis in the IR quads, the possibil- ity for large SR fluxes exists. A set of retractable tungsten foil radiation shields are mounted to the beampipe. These tungstenshieldswereclosedduringCESRinjectionforthe first yearofoperation,andthenwereleftopenduringHEP operationsandclosedduringmachinestudies. In order to reduce beam-gas scattering near the IR new vacuum chambers and pumping was installed within ±12 m of the IP. IR Pumpingis accomplishedin large plenums which incorporate massive titanium sublimation pumping [13]. Pumpingplenumsarelocatedat ±2m,±6m,and ± 10m fromtheIP. Detector backgrounds are monitored with two systems. The first is a PIN diode radiation monitoring system mounted directly on the ends of the beryllium beampipe. Twelve diodesaremountedoneachend andareuniformly distributed in azimuth. This system is sensitive to both charged particles and SR photons. Another system, con- sistingofasetofCsIcrystalsplacedintheCLEOendcaps, is usefulformonitoringchargedparticlebackgrounds. The background simulation predictions for design cur- rents (600 mA total) and a 40% duty factor are given in Table 1. Both the expected dose and occupancy are be- low the design goals mentionedabove. As can be seen the beam-gasbackgrounddominates. 3 OPERATIONALEXPERIENCE 3.1 TotalDoseand AverageRates CLEO II.V ran for a total of 172 weeks from 29 October 1995 until 15 February 1999. The first month was com-Table 1: Detector background simulation results for 600 mA totalcurrentanda40%dutyfactor. SVX layer1 Occ. Dose Source % hits/layer/ µskrad/year SR 0.002 0.64 Beam-Gas 0.18 8 Total 0.18 9 pletely devotedto machinestudies, thenexttwo monthsto a detector engineering run, but after that the detector ran continously for three years. There were eight scheduled maintenance periods lasting, on average, three and a half weeksandthreeunscheduledperiodseachofless thanone week. The integratedrunningtime ofthe detectorwas 142 weeks. During that time the total accumulated radiation dose measured by the beampipe PIN diode monitors was 22.2 krads. Of that, 14.8 krads were logged when CESR was delivering luminosity to CLEO and 12.0 krads when CLEOwasactuallytakingdata. ThedosewhenCESRwas not delivering luminosity was dominated by injection, and amounts to 3.6 krads. This implies that injection for lu- minosityrepresents30%ofthe doseloggedin datataking. Thebalanceofthedosewasloggedinmachinestudies(3.5 krads) and during the short time spent between injection and HEP data-taking (0.3 krads). Most of the dose during machinestudies( ∼75%)wasloggedduringinjection. The integrated dose versus month of running is shown in Fig- ure1. 0 10 20 30 40 Months Since CLEO II.V Turn On (29 Oct 1995)04000800012000160002000024000Interaction Region Integrated Dose (Rads)Average Total Average SVX On Figure 1: The integrated interaction point dose versus monthofCLEO II.Vrunning. DuringthecourseoftheCLEOII.VrunCESRdelivered 11.6 fb−1of luminosity and CLEO logged 9.0 fb−1. The total Amp-Hours accumulated during the CLEO II.V runwas just over 4000. These imply that the total dose rates were 0.16 krads/running week, 1.9 krads/fb−1delivered, 2.5 krads/fb−1logged, and 5.6 rads/Amp-Hour. Based on these numbers and the expected radiation hardness of the SVX readout electronics the detector could have survived for 30% longer. We did have one readout chip fail in the way expectedfromradiationdamage;a suddenincrease in noise in all the channels in the chip was observed in the last six monthsof running. This chip was in layer 3 where lower quality chips were used, but the dose rate was ex- pected to be more than a factor of two smaller than that observed by the PIN diode system which is located near layer1. Duringthe Phase II IRcommissioningperiod,2.4krads were accumulated in the first three months with only 155 A-hr. There are several reasons for this high specific dose rate. The dynamic pressure rise ( dP/dI) was naturally large during this period since new vacuum chambers were installed intheIR. Inaddition,muchofthetime wasspent tuning high current injection which has a higher dose rate than colliding beam running. This startup period repre- sented a dose/A-hr about three times what was achieved in normalrunning. 4 COMPARISONOF MEASUREMENTS WITHSIMULATION 4.1 PressureBump Studies Controlled pressure bump studies are among the most important tests of the beam-gas background simulation since such tests check directly the model of the source- effectiveness for scattered beam particles. By source- effectiveness we mean the relative contibution to detector backgroundduetobeam-gasscatteringataparticularloca- tion in the ring. The source-effectivenessfor SVX layer 1 hits predictedby the beam-gassimulation isshown in Fig- ure 2. (Reference[14] in these proceedingsshows another source effectiveness calculation, that for IR mask strikes .) Theactualbackgroundisthereforethesource-effectivene ss weightedbythepressureprofilescaledappropriatelybythe beamcurrent. We have performed such studies by turning off pumps near the IRto generatepressurebumpsandbyintroducing calibrated leaks. We report on one such study in which a calibrated N 2leak was introduced12 m from the IP. A se- riesof“pumpconditions”wasgeneratedbyturningoffsuc- cessive pumps near the IR [16]. Pressures were recorded for each pump condition. These data were used together with a model of pumping in the IR (described in [14] in these proceedings)togenerateapredictedpressureprofile . Pressure profiles for seven pump conditions predicted by the model are shown in Figures 3 and 4. The detec- tor radiation dose was measured for each of these seven conditions. The pressure profilestogetherwith the source- effectivenessandknownbeamcurrentprovideasimulation predictionofthe raditiondoseforeachofthe pumpcondi-SVX Layer 1 Source Effectiveness 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance From IP (meters)0.000.050.100.150.20Normalized Hits in SVX Layer 1Total Coulomb Figure 2: The source effectiveness distribution. This plot shows the relative contribution to the SVX layer 1 occu- pancy from beam-gas scattering as a function of scatter (source)position. Machine Studies of 10 December 1996 0 10 20 30 Distance from IP (meters)10-11101102103104Pressure (nTorr)Pump Condition 1Pump Condition 2 Pump Condition 3Pump Condition 4 Figure 3: Pressure distribution near the CESR/CLEO II.V interaction region during a controlled leak pressure bump studyforvariousvacuumpumpconditions. tions. The comparison is shown in Figure 5. We take the good agreementas confirmationthat the beam-gassource- effectivenesspredictedbythesimulationiscorrect.Machine Studies of 10 December 1996 0 10 20 30 Distance from IP (meters)10-11101102103104Pressure (nTorr)Pump Condition 5 Pump Condition 6 Pump Condition 7 Figure 4: Pressure distribution near the CESR/CLEO II.V interaction region during a controlled leak pressure bump studyforvariousvacuumpumpconditions. Machine Study of 10 December 1996 012345678 Pump Condition01234IR Radiation/Beam ((Rad/hr)/mA)Data Lost Beam Particle Simulation Figure 5: Radiation dose rate at the CESR/CLEO II.V IP for the seven pump conditions shown in Figures 3 and 4 comparedwiththepredictionofthe beam-gassimulation. 4.2 HighEnergyPhysicsRunning We canalsocheckthepredictionofoursimulationinstan- dard high energy physics (HEP) running conditions. This prediction depends on the pressure distribution which is takenfromacalculation[15]doneat abeamcurrentof300 mA.Theextrapolationtodifferentbeamcurrentsisdoneby assigningthepressuremeasurements(cold-cathodegaugesMachine Study of 11 August 1997 0 10 20 30 Distance from IP (meters)051015Pressure (nTorr)300 mA 200 mA 100 mA Figure 6: The calculated pressure profile near the CESR/CLEO II.VIRduringHEPrunning. Machine Study of 11 August 1997 0 100 200 300 400 Beam Current (mA)0123IR Radiation (rads/hour)Data Lost Beam Particle Simulation Figure 7: The radiation level at the CESR/CLEO II.V IP duringHEPrunning. Thepredictionofthelostbeamparti- cle simulationandthemeasureddataareshown. or ion pump currents) to regions of the beamline and ap- propriatelyscaling with beam current. The pressure distri - butionsused bythe simulationforHEP runningareshown in Figure 6 for various beam currents. The pressure distri- butioniscombinedwiththesourceeffectivenessandbeam currenttogivethebackgroundlevelsasafunctionofbeam current. Figure 7 shows the radiation level at the IP. The agreementisstriking. Since HEP data was also taken during this test we cancompare the measured and predicted occupancy levels in theCLEO II.Vdetector. ThemeasuredandpredictedSVX layer1occupancyareshowninFigure8. Theoccupancyis measured in terms of hits/strip/event where the integratio n time of an “event” is about 8 µs in the SVX. The agree- menthereisgood,butiscomplicatedbymanyconfounding Machine Study of 11 August 1997 0 100 200 300 400 Beam Current (mA)0.0000.0100.0200.0300.0400.050SVX Layer 1 Occupancy (1/strip-event)Data Lost Beam Particle Simulation Figure8: TheoccupancyinthefirstlayeroftheCLEOII.V SVX duringHEP running. Thepredictionofthe lostbeam particlesimulationandthemeasureddataareshown. factors. The occupancy measured in the SVX is a combi- nation of beam-related occupancy and electronic noise ef- fects. These electronic noise effects are measured with no beam in the machine, but are very sensitive to many other conditions. The electronic noise measured at zero beam current (0.009 hits/strip/event) has been added in quadra- ture with the beam-gassimulation hits to obtain the model predictionshownintheFigure. Wealsocomparetheoccu- pancy prediction and measurement as functions of the de- tector tracking layer in Figure 9 for 300 mA total current. Theelectronicnoiseatzerobeamcurrentisdeterminedfor eachlayerandcombinedwiththebeam-gassimulationhits as described above. The agreementfor the SVX (layers1- 3)isquitegood–withinafactoroftwo–whileforthegas tracking devices (the remaining layers) is within measure- menterrors. Notethatinallthesecomparisonsbetweenthemeasured beam induced backgrounds and the simulation prediction, the contributionof synchrotronradiationis neglected. Th e effects of synchrotron radiation are not expected to pene- tratebeyondthesecondtrackinglayerandthuswouldonly be observable in the radiation level and the first two lay- ersoftheSVX.Inanycasethesimulationpredictsthatthe contributionto SVX detector occupancyfrom synchrotron radiationduringHEPrunningis negligible.Machine Study of 11 August 1997 111 21 31 41 51 61 Tracking Layer Number (1-3 SVX, 4-13 VD, 14-64 DR)10-510-410-310-210-1Occupancy at 300 mA (1/Event)Data Beam Contribution Lost Beam Particle Simulation Figure 9: The occupancy as a function of tracking layer numberinCLEOII.VduringHEPrunning. Theprediction of the lost beam particle simulation and the measured data areshown. 4.3 SynchrotronRadiation Under normal HEP running the SR contribution to detec- tor backgroundscannot be detected. As mentioned above, simulation predicts the radiation dose from SR to be 8% that of lost particles,andthe contributionto detectorocc u- pancy only 1%. Therefore, to observe SR or to compare with simulations it is necessary to adjust the orbit through the IR so that the beam is intentionally placed far off-axis in theIRquadrupolesin ordertogeneratelargeSRfluxes. As a machine studies experiment large SR fluxes were generated in two ways. In the first (case A), the crossing angle was increasedfrom2.0mradto 2.7 mrad(yieldinga displacement of 19mm in Q1), and in the second (case B), a large amplitude bump was added to a reduced pretzel to yieldx′ IP=−1.9mrad and xIP=2.7 mm (yielding a displacement of 24 mm in Q1). For each measurement a single 10 mA bunchwas used. The tunes were adjusted as neededtomaintaingoodlifetime( τ >1000min). Inaddi- tion, the CsI radiation detectors were monitored to ensure that theparticlebackgroundsweremaintainedat anegligi- ble level. The crossingangle andbump amplitude(needed for input to the SR background simulation) were obtained byfittingtheorbitstoseparatorkicksandmagneticcorrec- torstrengthsrespectively. The trajectory for case A is shown in Figure 10. The incoming beam is bent in the strong horizontally focusing quadrupole Q1. The radiation fan from the central trajec- tory is shown by the upper and lower dotted lines. The beam is bent in Q0 (vertically focussing) and its radiation fan is shown by the lower and middle dotted lines. Thus,-6 -4 -2 0 2 Distance from the IP (m)-0.04-0.020.000.020.04X(m) Q0 Q1 Q2 Figure 10: Trajectory for the synchrotron radiation ma- chine studies experiment(case A). The interactionpoint is locatedat (0,0)onthisplot. Thebeampiperadiationmoni- tors are shownas blacksquareslocatedat ( ±0.13,±0.02). The“outside”ofCESRis +xandthe “inside”is −x. themasktipsontheoutsideofCESRareilluminatedbyQ1 radiation (from the core of the beam) and the downstream inside backscattering mask surface is illuminated by both Q1 andQ0radiation(frombeamsize). Figure 11: Beampipe radiation monitor response for the synchrotron radiation experiment labelled “case A.” The monitors0-11 are “downstream”in the experiment( z >0 inFigure10),and12-23are“upstream”( z <0). Thenum- beringisasfollows: 0and12arelocatedintheplaneofthe machine on the outsideof CESR, 3 and 15 are located on the top, 6 and 18 are located on the insideof CESR and 9 and21arelocatedonthebottom.The measured radiation distribution is compared to the Monte-Carlo simulation results in Figure 11. The highest radiationisobservedinmonitors0-11(downstream; z >0 in Figure 10) and arises from SR which backscatters from the downstream mask surface. The monitorson the down- stream end (0-11) have a larger solid angle from the mask surface than those on the upstream end (12-23) and those lying in the plane outside of CESR have the largest solid angle and therefore the largest radiation dose from x-ray fluorescence. The radiation on the upstream monitors is due primarily to tipscattering. The tips on the outside of CESRareilluminatedbyQ1radiation. Theupstreammon- itorsthereforehavethelargestsolidanglefromthetip,an d those on the inside have a larger solid angle than those on the outside. The comparison for case B is shown in Figure 12. The trajectory is displaced even further in Q1, so event greater SR fluxesaregenerated. Theradiationdistributionissimi- lartothatofthepreviouscase. Theagreementbetweenthe SR simulationand the data is quite good- typically within a factor of two. The experimental cases each test two dif- ferent aspects of the SR simulation since the backscatter- ing and tipscattering sources separately give rise to radia - tioninthedownstreamandupstreammonitorsrespectively. Therefore, agreement for monitors 0-11 can be viewed as a test of the backscatteringportion of the simulation while agreementformonitors12-23teststhetipscatteringporti on ofthesimulation. Figure 12: Beampipe radiation monitor response for the synchrotronradiationexperimentlabelled“case B.”5 CONCLUSION The CESR/CLEO II.V interaction region has been de- scribed. The radiation dose measured by the IR radiation monitors during 172 weeks of operation is 22.2 krads, 12 krads of which was accumulated during HEP data-taking. Detailed comparisons of the background simulation with measured detector background and radiation dose have been performed. The agreement between measured and predicted radiation doses in the IR from beam-gas scatter- ingisquitegood,within ∼25%forthevariousexperiments described. The comparison between beam-gas simulation and measured detector occupancies is in many ways more challenging. The agreement here is within a factor of two overarangeinbeamcurrentsandbetterathighercurrents. Synchrotron radiation is not readily observed during HEP running. The results of an experiment to generate a large SR dose were described and a comparison to simulation shows agreement within a factor of two in general, and much better in some cases. We are confident in the abil- ity of these simulations to predict detector backgroundsat CESRandhavebasedthedesignoftheCESRPhaseIIIIR shieldingonthem. 6 REFERENCES [1] S. Henderson, Proc. 1997 Part. Acc. Conf., Vancouver BC, p.291. [2] S. Henderson, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Back- grounds at the Machine Detector Interface, ed. T. Browder and S.Sahu, Honolulu HI,1997, WorldScientific,p.6. [3] Y. Kubota et.al.(CLEOCollaboration), NIMA320, (1992) 66. [4] T. Hill,NIMA418, (1998) 32. [5] S.Henderson, inthese proceedings. [6] J.P.Alexander et.al.NIMA337 (1993) 171. [7] CESR-B Conceptual Design for a B-Factory Based on CESR,Cornell,June 1993. [8] D. Cinabro, Proc. Workshop on Backgrounds at the Ma- chine Detector Interface for B factories, UH 511-838-96, Hawaii, 1995. [9] D. Cinabro, S. Henderson, H. Yamamoto, Int. Conf. High Energy Physics,Glasgow, 1994. [10] D. Cinabro, Proc. 8th Meeting of DPF (Albuquerque, NM), WorldScientific(1994). [11] S. Henderson, Proc. 8th Meeting of DPF (Albuquerque, NM), WorldScientific(1994). [12] S. Henderson and S. Roberts, Proc. 1999 Part. Acc. Conf. , New York, NY [13] N. Mistry, Proc. Part Acc. Conf. 1997, Vancouver BC, p.3559. [14] Y. Li,inthese proceedings. [15] Y. Li,private communication [16] N. Mistry, CornellCON 97-02.

arXiv:physics/0006002v1 [physics.class-ph] 2 Jun 2000Radiating dipoles in photonic crystals Kurt Busch1,2, Nipun Vats1, Sajeev John1and Barry C. Sanders3 1Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A7 2Institut f¨ ur Theorie der Kondensierten Materie, Universi t¨ at Karlsruhe, P.O. Box 6980, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany 3Department of Physics, Macquarie University, Sydney, New S outh Wales, Australia 2109 (Revised: February 2, 2008) The radiation dynamics of a dipole antenna embedded in a Phot onic Crystal are modeled by an initially excited harmonic oscillator coupled to a non–Mar kovian bath of harmonic oscillators repre- senting the colored electromagnetic vacuum within the crys tal. Realistic coupling constants based on the natural modes of the Photonic Crystal, i.e., Bloch wav es and their associated dispersion relation, are derived. For simple model systems, well-know n results such as decay times and emis- sion spectra are reproduced. This approach enables direct i ncorporation of realistic band structure computations into studies of radiative emission from atoms and molecules within photonic crystals. We therefore provide a predictive and interpretative tool f or experiments in both the microwave and optical regimes. 42.70.Qs,45.20.-d,45.20.Jj,45.30.+s I. INTRODUCTION Photonic crystals (PCs) have been the subject of in- tensive research over the past decade [1]. These are fab- ricated periodic dielectric arrays that employ a combi- nation of (i) Mie scattering from individual elements of the array, and (ii) Bragg scattering from the periodic lat- tice, to induce a band structure for photon propagation. This band structure is, in many ways, analogous to elec- tronic band structure in a semiconductor. Through a judicious selection of materials and of the periodicity of the lattice, the photonic dispersion relation and the as- sociated electromagnetic (EM) mode structure of a PC can be adapted to a variety of device applications. The most dramatic modification of the photon dispersion oc- curs when the linear propagation of a photon in a PC is prohibited in all directions for a range of frequencies, giving rise to a complete photonic band gap (PBG). The radiative dynamics of an optically active material placed within or near a PC can be dramatically modified from free space. This is a result of the “colored” electro- magnetic reservoir provided by the solutions to the elec- tromagnetic field equations within a PC. In the optical domain, theoretical studies of atomic transitions coupled to the EM modes of a PC with an optical PBG predict a number of novel quantum optical phenomena. These phenomena include: the suppression or enhancement of spontaneous emission and the associated fractional lo- calization of light near radiating atoms [2,3]; rapid all– optical switching [4]; and anomalous superradiant emis- sion, as well as low–threshold lasing near the edge of a PBG [5,6]. Microfabrication of PCs with complete PBGs at optical wavelengths has proven to be a difficult task, both because the lattice periodicity should be compara- ble to the wavelength of the light under consideration, and because a high dielectric contrast between the ele- ments of the lattice is required. Fortunately, recent ad- vances in microlithography [7]and in semiconductor in-filtration in colloidal crystals [8] have produced materi- als with significant pseudo–gaps in their photonic band structure [9]. The development of materials with com- plete PBGs in the optical regime appears imminent. High–quality PBG materials at microwave frequencies have been available for some time [10]. Sizeable band– gaps with center frequencies ranging from a few GHz up to 2 THz have been reported; these crystals have thus proven the soundness of the concept of the PBG. Mi- crowave PBG materials may be relatively easily manu- factured using micro-machining techniques, and are cur- rently of interest for applications such as the shielding of human tissue from microwave radiation, and for improv- ing the radiation characteristics of microwave antennæ. Although PBG materials at microwave frequencies have been extensively studied, the behavior of radiating dipo- lar antennæ embedded in microwave PCs has not re- ceived the same degree of attention. This is despite the fact that such antennæ would share many properties in common with atomic emission in a PC. In the microwave domain, a dipole antenna could take the form of an elec- trically excited metallic pin with a high Q(quality) fac- tor. The radiative dynamics of the above system can be de- scribed by a charged, one–dimensional simple harmonic oscillator (SHO). Such an electric dipole oscillator can also provide an excellent description of the radiation of single or multiple two–level atoms in the optical domain. This description is valid provided that the total excita- tion energy of the atoms is well below an energy where saturation (nonlinear) effects become important. More- over, the radiation reservoir can itself be modeled as a bath of many independent SHOs: Radiative damping arises from a linear coupling between the system SHO and the large number of reservoir oscillator modes. The similarities between the microwave and optical systems, coupled with the mature state of microwave technology, suggests that many of the predicted effects for atomic 1dipoles in the optical domain could be realized and stud- ied first in the microwave domain. Analytical techniques exist for treating certain forms of coupling between the dipole and reservoir for cer- tain modal distributions of the reservoir. However, PCs present coupling distributions and spectral prop- erties which defy analytical methods. This is due to the presence of a restricted and rapidly–varying reservoir mode distribution, which renders invalid the usual Born– Markov type approximation schemes for the system– reservoir interaction. To obtain accurate results, we solv e the system numerically for a large, but finite, number of oscillators in the reservoir by discretizing the modes of the reservoir following the approach of Ullersma [11]. In dealing with our system, there are crucial issues con- cerning obtaining the correct coupling strength between the oscillator and the reservoir modes, as well as in em- ploying the proper renormalization and mode sampling in numerical simulations. When these criteria are satis- fied, the SHO method comprises a powerful approach to treating radiative dynamics. Here, we develop a rigorous quantitative treatment of the radiative dynamics of an electric dipole oscillator cou - pled to the electromagnetic reservoir within a model PC. In the process, we provide a sound theoretical basis for this and other approaches [12] to non-Markovian radia- tive dynamics which involve the discretization of a model electromagnetic reservoir. Additionally, we show how our method can be applied to realistic PC’s with complicated dispersion relations and EM mode structures. The pa- per is organized as follows. In Section II, we develop a classical field theory for electromagnetic field modes in PCs, and we derive the coupling constants for the cou- pling between a radiating dipole and these Bloch modes. This leads to the Hamiltonian of the coupled system and the associated equations of motion. Renormalization is- sues arising from the non–relativistic nature of our the- ory are discussed in Section III, whereas Section IV de- scribes the discretization of the reservoir and the numer- ical solution of the equations of motion. In Section V, these techniques are applied to a highly computationally challenging model, that of a three–dimensional, isotropic dispersion relation with a complete PBG. The demon- stration of fractional localization and related phenomena validates the SHO approach to modeling radiative dy- namics in PCs. In Section VI we summarize the results and emphasize the possibilities for testing these predic- tions experimentally in the microwave domain. The two appendices are concerned with the details of the field the- ory for the PC and with the details of the model of the one–sided, isotropic PBG, respectively. II. CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY In this section, we derive the equations governing the dynamics of a radiating dipole oscillator located inside aPC. Typically the equation of motion for a damped os- cillator, with time-dependent coordinate q(t), is written as the second–order differential equation ¨q(t) +γ˙q(t) +ω2 0q(t) =F(t). (1) Here, we have introduced a damping constant γ, the natural frequency ω0and the driving field F(t) for the amplitude qof the linear oscillator. For instance, for a freely oscillating RLC circuit with ohmic resistance R, capacitance Cand inductance L, we have γ=R/L, ω2 0= 1/LC,F(t) = 0, and q(t) is the electric charge. Eq. (1) is, however, not the most general way of incorporat- ing damping into the equations of motion for a harmonic oscillator. This description can break down if, for exam- ple, there is a suppression of modes in the reservoir to which the dipole oscillator can couple. Such a suppres- sion of modes is a feature of the EM reservoir present in a PC. A more general description of damping forces acting on the harmonic oscillator therefore requires a pre- cise knowledge of the mode structure of its environment, and the corresponding coupling of the system oscillator to these modes. In the case of a radiating dipole located in a PC, it is then appropriate to model its emission dynamics with a SHO coupled to a reservoir of SHOs. The essential difference between the vacuum and a PC is then contained in the spectral distribution, or density of states (DOS), of the reservoir oscillators, and in the coupling constants between the reservoir modes and the system oscillator. The characterization of the reservoir is carried out in detail in Appendix A; here we only summarize the salient results. Given a radiating dipole with a natural frequency ω0, we obtain the classical Hamiltonian H=Hdip+Hres+Hct+Hint. (2) The first term on the right–hand side of the Hamiltonian is the energy of the dipole oscillator itself, Hdip=ξ ω0|α|2. (3) The natural frequency of the isolated oscillator is ω0, andξis a constant with the dimension of energy ×time. This permits us to write the energy of a SHO in units of its natural frequency ω,i.e.,E(ω) =ξω. The system oscillator’s complex amplitude is given by the dimension- less, time–dependent quantity α, defined with respect to the coordinate q(t) of Eq. (1) as α(t)≡/radicalBigg Lω0 2ξq(t) +ı/radicalbigg1 2ξLω0(L˙q(t)). (4) The next term in the Hamiltonian (2) corresponds to the free evolution of the radiation reservoir, which is modeled as a bath of independent SHOs, Hres=/summationdisplay µξ ωµ|βµ|2. (5) 2The natural electromagnetic modes of the PC are Bloch modes (see Appendix A), labeled with the index µ≡ (n/vectork), where nstands for the band index and /vectorkis a re- ciprocal lattice vector that lies in the first Brillouin zone (BZ). Their dispersion relation, ωµ, is different from the vacuum case, and may have complete gaps and/or the corresponding density of states may exhibit apprecia- ble pseudogap structure, the manifestation of multiple (Bragg) scattering effects in periodic media. As we are working within the framework of a non- relativistic field theory, we have introduced a mass renor- malization counter term Hct=−ξ∆|α|2that cancels un- physical UV-divergent terms [13,14]. The quantity ∆ is specified in Section III. The interaction between the oscillator and the reservoir is given by a linear coupling term. As the oscillator fre- quency is quite large, and the effective linewidth of the oscillation is relatively small, it is possible to simplify the interaction by applying the rotating–wave approxi- mation. In this approximation, couplings in the Hamil- tonian of the form α∗β∗ µand its complex conjugate are neglected, as these terms oscillate very rapidly compared to the terms of the type α∗βµand its conjugate. Hence, the interaction Hamiltonian can be expressed as Hint=−ıξ/summationdisplay µ/parenleftbig α∗g∗ µβµ−α gµβ∗ µ/parenrightbig . (6) In the case of a point dipole, i.e., when its spatial ex- tentais much smaller than the wavelength corresponding to its natural frequency, λ0= 2πω0/c, the coupling con- stants gµcan be derived from (i) the magnitude of the dipole moment, d(t) =aq(t), located at /vector r0, and (ii) the dipole orientation, ˆd, relative to that of the Bloch modes, /vectorEµ(/vector r0): gµ≡gµ(/vector r0) =ac/radicalbiggπ Lω0ωµ/parenleftBig ˆd·/vectorE∗ µ(/vector r0)/parenrightBig . (7) This dependence of the coupling constant on the dipole’s precise location within the PC is the second essential difference from the free–space case. As shown in Refs. [15,16], this position dependence may be quite strong, thus making its incorporation a sine qua non for any quantitative theory of of radiating antennæ or fluores- cence phenomena in realistic PCs. The emission dynamics can be evaluated from the Pois- son brackets of the oscillator amplitudes and their initial values, α(0) = 1 and βµ(0) = 0 ( ∀µ). Our choice of α(0) andβµ(0) corresponds to the initial condition of an ex- cited dipole antenna and a completely de–excited bath. The only non–zero Poisson brackets are {α, α∗}=/braceleftbig βµ, β∗ µ/bracerightbig =ı ξ. (8) Eqs. (2), (7) and (8), together with the initial values for the oscillator amplitudes, completely determine the emission dynamics of a radiating dipole embedded in aPC. In the following sections, we solve the correspond- ing equations of motion. This task is complicated by the nature of the reservoir’s excitation spectrum: as dis- cussed, the non-smooth density of states prohibits the use of a Markovian approximation and its appealing simpli- fying features [2,3,6]. Instead, we have to revert to a solution of the full non–Markovian problem. This is ac- complished by firstly rearranging the reservoir modes in a manner more suitable to both analytical as well as nu- merical solutions, and subsequently solving the equations of motion. In what follows, we bridge the gap between previous studies of simplified model dispersion relations [2,3,6] and band structure computations [15,17]. Although we will formally develop our theory for an LC circuit in a microwave PC, we emphasize that the formalism applies equally well to a semiclassical Lorentz oscillator model of an excited two-level atom, i.e., an electron with charge eand mass mwhich is bound to a stationary nucleus, for which the energy of excitation is well below that required for saturation effects to be- come relevant. The oscillator coordinate q(t) may then be identified with the deviation of the electron’s position from its equilibrium value, γis the inverse life time of the excited state, and ω0denotes the frequency for tran- sitions between excited and ground state of the two-level atom. This corresponds to making the substitutions: L→m,(L˙q)→p, ξ→¯h, (9) where h= 2π¯his Planck’s constant. III. PROJECTED LOCAL DENSITY OF STATES, MASS RENORMALIZATION AND LAMB SHIFT From the Hamiltonian (2) we derive the equations of motion for the amplitudes ˙α(t) =−ı(ω0−∆)α(t)−ı ξ/summationdisplay µg∗ µβµ(t) (10) ˙βµ(t) =−ı ωµβµ(t) +gµα(t), (11) for which we seek a solution with initial conditions α(0) = 1 and βµ(0) = 0 ( ∀µ). Our formalism however requires that we first determine the mass renormalization counter term ∆. This is most conveniently done in a rotating frame with slowly varying amplitudes a(t) and b(t), de- fined as α(t) =a(t)e−ıω0tandβ(t) =b(t)e−ıωµtrespec- tively: ˙a(t) =−ı ξ/summationdisplay µg∗ µeı(ω0−ωµ)tbµ(t) +ı∆a(t) (12) ˙b(t) =gµe−ı(ωo−ωµ)ta(t). (13) Conversely, Eqs. (12) and (13) comprise a stiff set of dif- ferential equations making their solution a difficult task. Numerical solution of the problem is more easily per- formed in the non-rotating frame, to which we return in Sect. IV. 3Eq. (13) may be formally integrated, bµ(t) =gµ/integraldisplayt 0dt′e−ı(ω0−ωµ)t′a(t′), (14) and inserted into Eq. (12) to yield ˙a(t) =−/integraldisplay∞ 0dt′G(t−t′)a(t′) +ı∆a(t), (15) where the Green function G(τ) contains all the informa- tion about the reservoir and is the subject of our studies for the remainder of this section. It is defined as G(τ)≡Θ(τ)/summationdisplay µ|gµ|2eı(ω0−ωµ)τ. (16) Here, Θ( τ) denotes the Heaviside step function, which ensures the causality of G(τ). We now proceed to evalu- ateG(τ) for the form of the coupling constants gµgiven in Eq. (7). To this end, we introduce the projected local DOS (PLDOS) N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) through N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) =/summationdisplay n/integraldisplay BZd3k (2π)3δ(ω−ωn/vectork)|ˆd·/vectorEn/vectork(/vector r0)|2, (17) where we have replaced the symbolic sum over µby its proper representation as a sum over bands plus a wave vector integral over the BZ. With these changes, we may rewrite G(τ) compactly as G(τ) =βΘ(τ)/integraldisplay∞ 0dωN(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) ωeı(ω0−ω)τ.(18) Here, we have abbreviated β= (πa2c2)/(Lω0). Eq. (18) makes more explicit what we have argued before: The spontaneous emission dynamics of active media in Pho- tonic Crystals are completely determined by the PLDOS, N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω). As the PLDOS may be drastically different from location to location within the Wigner–Seitz cell of the PC [15,16], it is imperative to have detailed knowl- edge about where in the PC the dipole is situated in order to understand and predict the outcome of corresponding experiments. One additional point deserves special attention: the total DOS, N(ω), is related to the local DOS via N(ω) =1 V/integraldisplay Vd3r/integraldisplay dΩˆdǫp(/vector r)N(/vector r,ˆd, ω) ∝ne}ationslash=1 V/integraldisplay Vd3r/integraldisplay dΩˆdN(/vector r,ˆd, ω), where Vis the volume of the Wigner–Seitz cell, and/integraltext dΩˆdis the average over all possible orientations of the dipole. Strictly speaking, it is not possible to base con- clusions about the radiation dynamics on the total DOS. This is a direct consequence of the fact that the naturalmodes of PCs are Bloch waves rather than plane waves as in free space. Depending on the band index, these Bloch modes prefer to “reside” predominantly in either low or high dielectric index regions (so-called air and dielectri c bands respectively). Only in the case of very low index contrast (“nearly free photons”) may the total DOS be viewed as a reliable guide to interpreting radiative dy- namics within a PC. The total DOS is, nevertheless, an adequate rule-of-thumb estimator. From Eq. (17) we can now obtain the Fourier transform of the Green function, G(Ω−ω0), centered around the atom’s bare transition frequency ω0: G(Ω−ω0) =/integraldisplay∞ 0dt eı(Ω−ω0)tG(t) =πβN(/vector r0,ˆd,Ω) ΩΘ(Ω) +ıβ/integraldisplay∞ 0dωN(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) ω℘/parenleftbigg1 Ω−ω/parenrightbigg , where ℘stands for the principal value. For large ω, we have N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω)∝ω2. The imaginary part of G(Ω−ω0) apparently contains a linear divergence in the UV. This divergence is to be expected for a non- relativistic theory, analogous to the problem of sponta- neous emission in vacuum [13], and is removed from the theory by using the mass counter renormalization term ∆, as first pointed out by Bethe [14]. Consequently, we decompose the imaginary part of G(Ω−ω0) into ℑ(G(Ω−ω0))≃ −(∆ +δvac+δa), (19) where we have used the notation: ∆ =β/integraldisplay∞ 0dωN(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) ω2 δvac=−β ω0 π2c3/integraldisplayΩc 0dω ℘/parenleftbigg1 ω0−ω/parenrightbigg δa=−β ω0 π2c3/integraldisplayΩc 0dω ℘/parenleftbigg1 ω0−ω/parenrightbigg × ×N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω)−N(vac)(ω) ω2. Here, we have performed a Wigner–Weisskopf-type ap- proximation on the vacuum and anomalous Lamb shifts [2],δvacandδa, respectively. This approximation is jus- tified by the fact that, despite its highly non–Markovian nature, a radiating dipole in a PC is still a weak coupling problem, as can be seen, for instance, by estimating the coupling constant g≃d0ω0/radicalBigg 2π V ξωn/vectork(20) in the Lorentz oscillator model. Here, V≈¯a3is the volume of the Wigner–Seitz cell of the PC (¯ ais the cor- responding lattice constant) and d0=ea0is the oscil- lator’s dipole moment for the elementary charge eand 4Bohr atomic radius, a0. At optical frequencies ( ω≈1015 s−1), a silicon inverted opal has a PBG at the fre- quency ¯ aω/2πc≈0.8, so that we obtain 10−7≤g/ω0≤ 10−6≪1, thus justifying our Wigner–Weisskopf approx- imation. As a consequence, we must treat the real part ofG(Ω−ω0) exactly, but are still allowed to tackle the imaginary part of G(Ω−ω0) using standard perturba- tion methods of QED. In addition, we have introduced the vacuum or free–space DOS N(vac)(ω) =ω2/(π2c3), and a cutoff frequency Ω c≫ω0, which is chosen large enough that the results of the following analysis remain independent of the precise value of Ω c. In a Lorentz os- cillator model, for instance, Ω ccan be identified with the Compton frequency Ω c≃mc2/¯h, asω > ω cprobes the relativistic aspects of the oscillating charge, which are beyond the scope of the model. With the foregoing analysis, we have determined the mass renormalization counter term ∆. In addition, we have derived an explicit expression for the anomalous Lamb shift δa[2] which originates in the “reshuffling” of the reservoir’s spectral weight by the PC. IV. DISCRETIZATION OF THE RESERVOIR To solve the equation of motion for the amplitude of the system oscillator, let us rewrite Eq. (15) in a more explicit form: ˙a(t) =−/integraldisplay∞ 0dω N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω)g2(ω)/integraldisplayt 0dt′eı(ω0−ω)(t−t′)a(t′) +ı∆a(t), (21) where g2(ω) = β/ω, and the mass renormalization counter term ∆ is given by ∆ =β/integraldisplay∞ 0dωN(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) ω2. (22) We remind the reader that a(0) = 1. We are now in a position to comment on the origin of the linear damping term γ˙q(t) that appears in Eq. (1): If we consider the long time limit, i. e.,t≫1/ω0, and assume that the PLDOS N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) is a smooth function for frequencies around ω0, we can approximate the fre- quency integral in Eq. (21) by/bracketleftBig 2πβN(/vector r0,ˆd, ω0)/ω0/bracketrightBig δ(t− t′), which leads to ˙a(t) =−γa(t), (23) where the decay constant is defined as γ= 2πβN(/vector r0,ˆd, ω0)/ω0. (24) This approximation is is valid only for long times relative to 1/ω0, and for a sufficiently smooth density of states. However, in the case of a PC, the PLDOS may havesharp discontinuities and gaps, thus requiring that the full equations of motion instead. To solve the integro-differential equation (21) in a PC, we appeal to the literal meaning of the PLDOS as a den- sity of states: N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) may be interpreted as an un- normalized probability density of finding a reservoir oscil - lator with frequency ωat position /vector r0and orientation ˆd. Consequently, we transform Eq. (21) back to a system of coupled differential equations by employing a Monte Carlo integration scheme for an arbitrary function f(ω) according to /integraldisplay∞ 0dω N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω)f(ω)≃/integraldisplayΩc 0dω N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω)f(ω) ≈N0 MM/summationdisplay i=1f(ωi), (25) where the normalization constant N0=/integraldisplayΩc 0dω N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) (26) depends on the cutoff frequency, Ω c. There are M≫1 bath oscillators, contained within a set of frequencies {ωi,1≤i≤M}, the frequencies of which are obtained by randomly sampling the interval [0 ,Ωc] according to the probability density p(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) = N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω)/N0. Note that the ωimay be degenerate, as prescribed by p(/vector r0,ˆd, ω). Applying this Monte Carlo scheme to Eq. (21) and transforming back to a non-rotating frame in order to avoid having to solve a numerically stiff problem, we ob- tain ˙α(t) =−ı(ω0−∆)α(t)−ı ξN/summationdisplay i=1giβi(t) (27) ˙βi(t) =−ı ωiβi(t) +giα(t), (28) where gi=g(ωi),1≤i≤M, and the mass renormaliza- tion counter term is evaluated up to the cutoff frequency Ωc,i.e., ∆ =/integraltextΩc 0dω N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω)/ω2. When comparing Eqs. (27) and (28) to our initial equa- tions of motion, Eqs. (10) and (11), we observe that the considerations in the previous section have allowed us to rearrange the three-dimensional wave vector sum over the modes µ≡(n/vectork) into a simple one-dimensional sum over a set of frequencies {ωi}with a probability distri- bution p(/vector r0,ˆd, ω) that is easily determined through stan- dard photonic band structure computation [15]. In the following section, we give the solutions of (27) and (28) for a model system which has previously been treated by other methods. In particular, we will demonstrate that known results for the radiative dynamics can be recap- tured and do not depend on the the value of the cutoff fre- quency Ω cand the number Mof reservoir oscillators once these quantities are large enough such that all the rele- vant features of N(/vector r0,ˆd, ω), are adequately represented. 5V. NUMERICAL RESULTS FOR A MODEL SYSTEM In order to establish the validity of our approach, we now solve Eqs. (27) and (28) for a generic model of a PBG, the three-dimensional isotropic, one-sided PBG [3]. In Appendix B, we outline the construction of the model’s dispersion relation and how to obtain the corresponding model DOS, Nm(ω). We note that we do not appeal to an effective mass approximation in the dispersion relation [6], as is done in most treatments of band–edge dynamics. This allows us to recover the correct form of the large frequency behavior of the photon density of states. In Fig. 1, we show the behavior of Nm(ω) as a func- tion of frequency for values of the relevant parameters, the gap size parameter η= 0.8 and the normalized cen- ter frequency ωca/2πc= 0.5 (see Appendix B). The DOS exhibits a square-root singularity at the band edge ωua/2πc= 0.6, as well as a UV divergence, Nm(ω)∝ω2, asω→ ∞; these are the characteristic features of this model. Due to the simultaneous presence of both diver- gences, this model clearly represents a severe numerical test of our approach. In order to test the method, we thus replace the PLDOS entering Eqs. (27) and (28) by Nm(ω). In Fig. 2, we present the results of our numerical so- lution for the radiation dynamics of a dipole oscillator with frequency ω0that is coupled to the modes of a PC, as described by Eqs. (27) and (28), for various values of the bare oscillator frequency, ω0a/2πc, relative to the bandedge at ωua/2πc= 0.6. The coupling strength has been chosen such that g(ω0) = 10−4, corresponding to β= 10−8×ω3 0. Clearly visible are normal mode oscillations, also re- ferred to as vacuum Rabi oscillations, and the fractional localization of the oscillator’s energy at long times near the photonic band–edge [3]. As expected, for frequen- cies deep in the photonic band–gap ( ω0a/2πc= 0.58), where the system oscillator is effectively decoupled from the bath oscillators, we find no noticeable decay of the oscillator amplitude. Deep in the photonic conduction band ( ω0a/2πc= 0.62), the system oscillator is coupled to a bath with a smooth and slowly–varying mode den- sity, as in free space. We therefore observe exponential decay of the oscillator amplitude, though with a time scale that differs significantly from that in free space. Due to the large value of the DOS close to the pho- tonic band edge, the initial decay is faster for bare os- cillator frequencies close to this edge than for frequencie s deep inside the allowed photonic band. These results were obtained for a smooth exponential cutoff for the DOS around Ω ca/2πc= 3.0 and M= 2.5×105oscil- lators representing the modes of the PC. We also per- formed numerical simulations between all combinations of Ω candMwith values Ω ca/2πc= 3.0,6.0,9.0 and M= 2.5×105,5×105,106and found that the numeri- cal values differ by at most 0.2% of the values shown inFig 1. This demonstrates that, despite the presence of the singularities in the DOS, our approach still provides accurate and convergent results. VI. DISCUSSION In summary, we have developed a realistic field theory for an oscillating electric dipole located in a PC. The theory is based on the natural modes of the PC, the Bloch waves, and allows the direct incorporation of real- istic band structure calculations in order to obtain quan- titative results for the radiation dynamics of the dipole antenna. We have shown how the theory must be renor- malized in order to account for unphysical divergences and have identified the classical analogue of the Lamb shift of the dipole’s natural radiation frequency. Finally , we have developed a reliable numerical scheme based on a probability interpretation of the PLDOS that solves the equations of motion for the dipole oscillator coupled to the electromagnetic mode reservoir of the PC. The viability of this approach was demonstrated for an isotropic model DOS for which we have derived well- known results for radiating atomic systems [3] in the con- text of a radiating classical dipole. The model considered contains two divergences, one square-root-divergence at the photonic band edge and a quadratic UV-divergence, and therefore clearly comprises the most serious test of our approach. More realistic models of a three di- mensional photonic band-edge take into account the anisotropy of the BZ, and therefore do not suffer from a band–edge singularity [6]. As a result, our formalism is clearly more than capable of treating more realistic de- scriptions of the electromagnetic reservoir within a PC. Though we have developed our theory for an LC cir- cuit in a microwave PC, we have pointed out in Section II that the formalism applies equally well to a semiclassi- cal Lorentz oscillator model of an excited two-level atom. Therefore, our approach is applicable to both microwave antennæ and to optical atomic transitions. However, technological constraints suggest that microwave experi- ments will likely be easier to perform than optical exper- iments involving single atoms. As discussed, an appro- priate microwave antenna could, for example, take the form of a high-Q metallic pin placed in or near a PC. The pin can then be excited by a focused ultrashort laser pulse that generates free carriers at one end; these carri- ers then undergo several oscillations across the pin before re–establishing charge equilibrium. The resulting signal could be easily detected and compared with the emis- sion from such an antenna positioned in free space, or within a homogeneous sample of the dielectric material that makes up the backbone of the PC under considera- tion. In its own right, such a microwave system could have considerable applications in radio science and microwave technology. For example, the PBG can be used as a fre- 6quency filter, and can be used to fine tune the bandwidth of a dipole emitter with a resonant frequency near the edge of the gap. It may also be possible to actively modify the photonic band structure, effectively changing the ra- diation pattern of a dipole emitter. A feasible scheme for active band structure modification has recently been pro- posed in the context of optical PCs [18], in which the PC is infiltrated with a liquid crystalline material whose ne- matic director is aligned using applied electric fields. By rotating the director, it was found that the band struc- ture could be significantly modified, and that PBGs may be opened and closed altogether. Similar methods may be applied to the case of microwave PCs. Although we have concentrated specifically on the lin- ear model, the method of coupled oscillators can be ex- tended to treat a nonlinear antennæ , or a collection of two–level atoms in a regime where saturation effects arise. As we have shown here, this method of coupled classical oscillators reproduces effects normally associ- ated with quantum optical calculations. We expect that a nonlinear oscillator model will reproduce some of the effects studied for a single two–level atom coupled to the modes of a PC without the need for quantizing the field. However, a classical treatment would need to be aban- doned if multiphoton excitations are non–negligible [12]. Given that multiphoton effects are difficult to observe in the microwave domain [19] and even more challenging in the optical domain [20], it is reasonable to expect that a classical model of radiative dynamics in a PC should be sufficient for foreseeable experiments. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to K.-J. Boller and R. Beigang for stim- ulating discussions concerning the experimental realiza- tion of radiating dipoles in microwave PCs. The work of KB the was supported by the Deutsche Forschungs- gemeinschaft (DFG) under Grant Bu 1107/1-1. NV ac- knowledges support from the Ontario Graduate Schol- arship Program. BCS acknowledges support from the Department of Physics, University of Toronto, and the support of an Australian Research Council Large Grant. This work was supported in part by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization of Japan and by Photonics Research Ontario. APPENDIX A: CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY FOR PHOTONIC CRYSTALS In this Appendix, we present a self-contained formula- tion of a classical field theory for the Bloch modes of a PC, and we develop the Hamiltonian describing the cou- pling of a radiating dipole couples to these modes. As a first step, we review the computation of dispersion re- lations, and of electric and magnetic field modes fromband structure calculations [15]. We then demonstrate how the results of such band structure calculations can be used to construct the corresponding vector potentials and free field Hamiltonian. Finally, we derive the full minimal coupling Hamiltonian for a classical radiating dipole embedded in a PC. This may be compared to the formulation of a general, quantized field theory for EM modes in nonuniform dielectric media in terms of a nor- mal mode expansion in the context of quantum optics [21]. 1. Review of band structure calculations We develop our theory in terms of the magnetic field /vectorH rather than in terms of the electric or displacement fields because (i) ∇ ·/vectorH= 0 and, (ii) the transverse and longi- tudinal components of the magnetic field are continuous across the dielectric boundaries. This leads to more rapid convergence of the relevant Fourier series expansions. In a three-dimensional PC, we can write the eigenvalue equation for the magnetic field /vectorHas ∇ ×/parenleftBig ηp(/vector r)∇ ×/vectorH/parenrightBig +ω2 c2/vectorH=/vector0 (A1) withηp(/vector r) the inverse of the periodic dielectric permit- tivity, ǫp(/vector r) =ǫb+ (ǫa−ǫb)/summationdisplay /vector n∈Z3S(/vector r−/vector n·A). (A2) The medium is assumed to consist of a background ma- terial with bulk permittivity ǫband a set of scatterers, with bulk permittivity ǫa. The shape of the scatterers is described by the function S, i. e.,, S(/vector r) = 1 if /vector rlies inside the scatterer and zero elsewhere, distributed periodicall y at positions /braceleftBig /vectorR/bracerightBig =/braceleftBigg3/summationdisplay i=1ni/vector ai|ni∈ Z/bracerightBigg . (A3) The notation of Eq. (A2) is obtained by defining the matrix A= (/vector a1/vector a2/vector a3) and Z3=Z ⊗ Z ⊗ Z . The di- electric permittivity is spatially periodic modula /vector n·A. The assumption of a scalar permittivity is reasonable for bulk materials which are not birefringent but in no way restricts the considerations below. Chromatic dis- persion effects are considered to be negligible, thus al- lowing the time-dependence of the permittivity to be ig- nored. Let us define the dual matrix B= 2π(A−1)T. ForB= (/vectorb1/vectorb2/vectorb3), this definition leads to the orthogo- nality relation /vector ai·/vectorbj= 2π δij. (A4) Whereas the points /vector n·Aare the real space lattice vectors, the points /vector m·B, for/vector m∈ Z3are the reciprocal lattice 7vectors. The inverse permittivity can be expanded in the dual basis as ηp(/vector r) =/summationdisplay /vector m∈Z3η/vector meı/vector m·B·/vector r. (A5) The differential equation (A1) has periodic coefficients. By the Bloch-Floquet theorem we can expand the mag- netic field as /vectorH/vectork=eı/vectork·/vector r/vector u/vectork(/vector r) (A6) where /vector u/vectorkis spatially periodic modulo A; that is, /vector u/vectork(/vector r) =/vector u/vectork(/vector r+/vector n·A). (A7) The set {/vectork}labeling the solutions can be restricted to lie within in the irreducible part of the first Brillouin zone (BZ), since any value of /vectorkcan then be obtained through a combination of group transformations with respect to an operation from the point group of the crystal and translations with respect to a reciprocal lattice vector. We can therefore express each wavevector /vectorkas /vectork≡/vectorkT,/vector m≡/vectork∗·T+/vector m·B, (A8) where /vectork∗is an element of the irreducible part of the 1. BZ and Tan element of the crystal’s point group. Applying the Bloch-Floquet theorem, Eq. (A6), the magnetic field can be expanded as /vectorH/vectork=eı/vectork·/vector r/summationdisplay /vector m2/summationdisplay λ=1h/vectork,λ /vector mˆe/vectork,λ /vector meı/vector m·B·/vector r. (A9) Hereλis the index of polarization and the vectors /braceleftBigg ˆe/vectork,1 /vector m,ˆe/vectork,2 /vector m,/vectork+/vector m·B |/vectork+/vector m·B|/bracerightBigg (A10) form an orthonormal right-handed triad. This expansion inserted into Eq (A1) yields an infinite eigenvalue prob- lem which is then solved numerically by a suitable trun- cation. Typically the cardinality of the set {/vector m}is on the order of 103[15]. For any given /vectork∗we obtain a discrete set of eigenfrequencies ωn/vectorkand corresponding eigenfunc- tionsHn/vectorkwhich we label by the band index n∈ N. It is important to note that the expression for the electric field can be recovered from the magnetic field via /vectorEn/vectork(/vector r) =−ic ωn/vectorkǫp(/vector r)∇ ×/vectorHn/vectork(/vector r) (A11) In addition, the Bloch waves obey the following orthog- onality relations: /integraldisplay d3r/vectorH∗ n/vectork(/vector r)·/vectorHm/vectork′(/vector r)∝δnmδ(/vectork−/vectork′),(A12) /integraldisplay d3r ǫp(/vector r)/vectorE∗ n/vectork(/vector r)·/vectorEm/vectork′(/vector r)∝δnmδ(/vectork−/vectork′),(A13) where the integration is over all space in both cases. We are free to choose the constants of proportionality in the above relations, and do so in the next subsection.2. Free–field Hamiltonian Based on the above considerations, we are now in a position to derive the general expressions for the scalar and vector potential, φ(/vector r, t) and /vectorA(/vector r, t) respectively, for the classical Hamiltonian of the free radiation field. We find that the expressions become particularly transparent in the Dzyaloshinsky gauge, i.e., when φ(/vector r, t)≡0. Then, /vectorE(/vector r, t) =−1 c∂/vectorA(/vector r, t) ∂ t, (A14) /vectorH(/vector r, t) =∇ ×/vectorA(/vector r, t), (A15) and the gauge condition ∇ ·/parenleftBig ǫp(/vector r)/vectorA(/vector r, t)/parenrightBig = 0, reveals that in a PC the natural modes of the radiation field are no longer transverse. This is of importance when quan- tizing the field theory [21,22]. Given Eqs. (A1), (A11), (A14) and (A15), it is now straightforward to derive the following expansion of the vector potential /vectorA(/vector r, t) /vectorA(/vector r, t) =/summationdisplay n/integraldisplay BZd3k (2π)3/radicalBigg 2πξc2 ωn/vectork∗ /parenleftBig βn/vectork(t)/vectorAn/vectork(/vector r) +β∗ n/vectork(t)/vectorA∗ n/vectork(/vector r)/parenrightBig ,(A16) where the time evolution of the free field is described by βn/vectork(t) =βn/vectork(0)e−ıωn/vectorkt. The field modes /vectorAn/vectork(/vector r) obey ∇ × ∇ × /vectorAn/vectork(/vector r) =ω2 n/vectork c2ǫp(/vector r)/vectorAn/vectork(/vector r), (A17) which is the same equation as that for the electric field modes /vectorEn/vectork(/vector r) of Eq. (A11). We now choose the normal- ization of /vectorAn/vectorksuch that /integraldisplay d3r ǫp(/vector r)/vectorAn/vectork(/vector r)·/vectorAm/vectork′(/vector r) =δnmδ(/vectork−/vectork′),(A18) /integraldisplay d3r/parenleftBig ∇ ×/vectorAn/vectork(/vector r)/parenrightBig ·/parenleftBig ∇ ×/vectorAm/vectork′(/vector r)/parenrightBig = ω2 n/vectork c2δnmδ(/vectork−/vectork′). (A19) This also fixes the normalization in Eqs. (A12) and (A13). As a consequence, the total electric and magnetic field are now given by /vectorE(/vector r, t) =ı/summationdisplay n/integraldisplay BZd3k (2π)3/radicalBigg 2πξc2 ωn/vectork∗ /parenleftBig βn/vectork(t)/vectorEn/vectork(/vector r)−β∗ n/vectork(t)/vectorE∗ n/vectork(/vector r)/parenrightBig ,(A20) /vectorH(/vector r, t) =/summationdisplay n/integraldisplay BZd3k (2π)3/radicalBigg 2πξc2 ωn/vectork∗ /parenleftBig βn/vectork(t)/vectorHn/vectork(/vector r) +β∗ n/vectork(t)/vectorH∗ n/vectork(/vector r)/parenrightBig ,(A21) 8where we have re–introduced the electric and magnetic field modes, /vectorEn/vectork(/vector r) = (ωn/vectork/c)/vectorAn/vectork(/vector r) and /vectorHn/vectork(/vector r) =∇× /vectorAn/vectork(/vector r), respectively. Eqs. (A20) and (A21) finally lead us to the free field Hamiltonian Hres=/summationdisplay n/integraldisplay BZd3k ξωn/vectork|βn/vectork|2. (A22) The only nonzero Poisson brackets are/braceleftBig βn/vectork, β∗ n/vectork/bracerightBig =ı/w. 3. Radiating dipole embedded in a Photonic Crystal We consider the insertion of a point dipole into a PBG structure at a prescribed location /vector r0. The free dipole oscillator is described by the Hamiltonian Hdip Hdip=L˙q2 2L+1 2L ω2 0q2=ξω0|α|2, (A23) where the dipole’s natural frequency is ω0= 1/LCand the complex oscillator amplitude αis given in terms of the charge qand “current” L˙qasα(t) =q(t)/radicalbig Lω0/2w+ ı(L˙q(t))/√2ξLω0, with Poisson brackets {α, α∗}=ı/ξ. The point dipole couples to the electric field via its dipole moment d(t) =aq(t) with orientation ˆd, which yields the interaction energy Hint=−aq(t)/parenleftBig ˆd·/vectorE(/vector r0, t)/parenrightBig . (A24) In the rotating wave approximation to the interaction term, the final minimal coupling Hamiltonian for a radi- ating dipole in a PC is H=Hdip+Hres+Hct+Hint. (A25) Collecting all the above results we obtain H=ξω0|α|2+/summationdisplay µξωµ|βµ|2+Hct −ıξ/summationdisplay µ/parenleftbig α∗g∗ µβµ−α gµβ∗ µ/parenrightbig . (A26) Here, we have introduced the symbolic index µ≡(n/vectork) and the coupling constants gµ gµ≡gµ(/vector r0) =ac/radicalbiggπ Lω0ωµ/parenleftBig ˆd·/vectorE∗ µ(/vector r0)/parenrightBig .(A27) In addition, in Eq. (A25) we have introduced a mass renormalization counter term, Hct=−ξ∆|α|2in or- der to cancel unphysical UV-divergent terms of our non- relativistic theory, as discussed in the main text. For completeness, we list here only the nonzero Poisson brackets and initial values for an initially excited radi- ating dipole coupled to the Bloch waves of a PC. This, together with the Hamilton function Hin Eq. (A25) com- pletely defines our problem: {α, α∗}=/braceleftbig βµ, β∗ µ/bracerightbig =ı ξ, (A28) where α(0) = 1 and βµ(0) = 0 for all µ.APPENDIX B: MODEL DISPERSION RELATION AND DENSITY OF STATES A particularly stringent test of our approach’s ability to describe the dynamics of a radiating dipole in a PC comes from its application to a dipole coupled to a 3D isotropic photon dispersion model for the electromagnetic reservoir. In this model, the coherent scattering condi- tion that characterizes the photonic band edge is assumed to occur at the same frequency for all directions of propa- gation. Clearly this is not the case in a real crystal, whose Brillouin zone cannot have full rotational symmetry. As a result, the isotropic model overestimates the electro- magnetic modes available at a band–edge, so that, for example, near the upper photonic band edge at frequency ωu, the corresponding DOS exhibits a divergence of the formN(ω)∝1/√ω−ωu. Conversely, for large frequen- cies (ω≫ωu) the DOS will exhibit a UV-divergence, i.e., N(ω)∝ω2, as is the case in free space. More realistic LDOS’ coming from full photonic band structure compu- tations do not suffer from the pathological band edge di- vergence of the isotropic model. However, by solving the model of a 3D isotropic photonic band gap, we make con- tact with previous results based on the isotropic model in the effective mass approximation [3]. Consider a 1D photonic dispersion relation in the ex- tended zone scheme. In order to describe a PBG at wave number k0with central frequency ωc=ck0= (ωu+ωl)/2 and upper and lower band edge at ωuandωl, respectively, we use the following Ansatz ω(k) =  ω++c+/radicalBig (k−k0)2+γ2 +fork >0 ω−+c−/radicalBig (k−k0)2+γ2 −fork <0.(B1) Using the requirements ω(k= 0) = 0, ω(k=k0−0+) = ωl,ω(k=k0+0+) =ωu,∂kω(k= 0) = ∂kω(k→ ∞) =c, and∂kω(k=k0−0+) =∂kω(k=k0+ 0+) = 0, the unknown parameters in (B1) can easily be expressed in terms of a single parameter η=ωl/ωc, 1/2< η≤1 that describes the size of the photonic bandgap, giving: ω+=ωc,c+=c,γ+=k0(1−η),ω−=ωc(η2)/(2η−1), c−=cη/√2η−1, and γ−=k0(1−η)/√2η−1. From the dispersion relation (B1), the corresponding DOS, i. e.,N(ω) =/integraltext d3k δ(ω−ω(k)) is given by Nm(ω) =  4πc2 −[k0−√ (ω−ω−)2/c2 −−γ2 −]2(ω−−ω)√ (ω−ω−)2/c2 −−γ2 − for 0≤ω≤ωl 4πc2 +[k0+√ (ω−ω+)2/c2 +−γ2 +]2(ω−ω+)√ (ω−ω+)2/c+−2−γ2 + forωu≤ω <∞(B2) For sufficiently large gaps ( η≤0.9) and bare eigenfre- quencies ω0of the radiating dipole close to the upper band edge, it is an excellent approximation to ignore the lower branch of the photon dispersion relation, i. e., 9fork≤k0. The resulting DOS for this so-called three- dimensional isotropic, one-sided bandgap model is shown in Fig. 1 for a value of gap width parameter η= 0.8 and the gap center frequency ωca/2πc= 0.5. The square-root singularity at the band edge as well as the UV divergence Nm(ω)∝ω2asω→ ∞ are clearly visible. [1] C. M. Soukoulis (ed.), Photonic Band Gap Materials , Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996). [2] S. John and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2418 (1990), Phys. Rev. B 43, 12 772 (1991). [3] T. Quang and S. John, Phys. Rev. A 50, 1764 (1994). [4] S. John and T. Quang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1888 (1997). [5] S. John and T. Quang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3419 (1995). [6] N. Vats and S. John, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4168 (1998). [7] J.G. Flemming and S.Y. Lin, Optics Lett. 24, 49 (1999). [8] J.E.G.J. Wijnhoven and W.L. Vos, Science 281, 802 (1998) [9] M.S. Thijssen, R. Sprik, J.E.G.J. Wijnhoven, M. Megens, T. Narayanan, A. Lagendijk and W.L. Vos, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2730 (1999). [10] E. ¨Ozbay et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1969 (1995). [11] P. Ullersma, Physica 32, 27 (1966). [12] G. M. Nikolopoulos, S. Bay, and P. Lambropoulos, Phys. Rev. A 60, 5079 (1999). [13] L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical resonance and two-level atoms , Dover Publications, 1987 [14] H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 72, 339 (1947) [15] K. Busch and S. John, Phys. Rev. E 58, 3896 (1998) [16] R. Sprik, B. A. van Tiggelen, and A. Lagendik, Europhys. Lett.35, 265 (1996) [17] K.-M. Ho, C. T. Chan, and C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 3152 (1990) [18] K. Busch and S. John, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 967 (1999) [19] M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Ha- gley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1800 (1996). [20] H. J. Carmichael, P. Kochan, B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 631 (1996). [21] R. Glauber amd M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 43, 467 (1991) [22] G. Kweon and N. M. Lawandy, Opt. Comm. 118, 388 (1995) 10Figure 1: The DOS for the three-dimensional, isotropic one-sided bandgap model of a PC. The parameters (see appendix B) are η= 0.8 and ωca/2πc= 0.5. Figure 2: The radiation dynamics resulting from the three-dimensional, isotropic one-sided bandgap model DOS as shown in Fig. 1 for various values of the bare dipole oscillator frequency ω0relative to the upper pho- tonic bandedge ωu. The photonic bandedge is siutated atωua/2πc= 0.6 and the bare dipole oscillator frequen- cies are (a) ω0a/2πc= 0.58, (b) ω0a/2πc= 0.595, (c) ω0a/2πc= 0.599, (d) ω0a/2πc= 0.6, (e) ω0a/2πc= 0.601, (f) ω0a/2πc= 0.605, and (g) ω0a/2πc= 0.62. Clearly visible are normal–mode oscillations, or vacuum Rabi oscillations, and the fractional localization of radi a- tion near the photonic bandedge. The coupling strength has been chosen such that g(ω0) = 10−4. For frequen- cies deep in the photonic bandgap ( ω0a/2πc= 0.58) and deep in the photonic conduction band ( ω0a/2πc= 0.62) we observe negligible and exponential decay, respectively . 110 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.400.511.522.533.54PSfrag replacemen ts/! a/= /2 / cDOS /(arbitrary units/)Figure /1/: The DOS for the three/-dimensional/, isotropic one/-sided bandgapmo del of a PC/. The parameters /(see app endix B/) are / /= /0 /: /8 and /!c a/= /2 / c /=/0 /: /5/.R adiating Dip oles in Photonic CrystalsKurt Busch/, Nipun V ats/, Saje ev John/, and Barry C/. Sanders/10 2000 4000 6000 8000 1000000.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91PSfrag replacemen ts j / /( t /) j/!/0 t /(a/)/(b/)/(c/)/(d/)/(e/)/(f /) /(g/)Figure /2/: The radiation dynamics resulting from the three/-dimensional/,isotropic one/-sided bandgap mo del DOS as sho wn in Fig/. /1 for v ariousv alues of the bare dip ole oscillator frequency /!/0 relativ e to the upp er pho/-tonic bandedge /!u /. The photonic bandedge is siutated at /!u a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /6 andthe bare dip ole oscillator frequencies are /(a/) /!/0 a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /5/8/, /(b/) /!/0 a/= /2 / c /=/0 /: /5/9/5/, /(c/) /!/0 a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /5/9/9/, /(d/) /!/0 a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /6/, /(e/) /!/0 a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /6/0/1/, /(f /)/!/0 a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /6/0/5/, and /(g/) /!/0 a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /6/2/. Clearly visible are normal/{mo de oscillations/, or v acuum Rabi oscillations/, and the fractional lo caliza/-tion of radiation near the photonic bandedge/. The coupling strength hasb een c hosen suc h that g /( /!/0 /) /= /1/0 /BnZr /4/. F or frequencies deep in the pho/-tonic bandgap /( /!/0 a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /5/8/) and deep in the photonic conduction band/( /!/0 a/= /2 / c /= /0 /: /6/2/) w e observ e negligible and exp onen tial deca y /, resp ectiv ely /.R adiating Dip oles in Photonic CrystalsKurt Busch/, Nipun V ats/, Saje ev John/, and Barry C/. Sanders/2

arXiv:physics/0006003v1 [physics.chem-ph] 2 Jun 2000Electron-hole pairs multiquantum generation mechanizm in the process of excitation of ZnSCdS −Cuby an atomic hydrogen Yu.A.Sivov, Yu.I.Tyurin, V.D.Choruzhii Tomsk Polytechnical University, Rossia Abstract The luminecsence of ZnSCdS −Cuphosphors of various CdS consentration (0 −40%) is under investigation. The luminescence was exited by hydrogen atoms during adsorbtion of thermal energ y during adsorbtion and impact recombination-heterogeneous chemi luminenscence( HCL) are discussed. The monotone lowering of the conductivity zo ne bot- tom level with respect to the valence zone ceiling (from 3 ,7eVto 3,2eV) with increasing CdSconcentration (from 0 −40%). HCL in- tensity with respect to CdS(from 3,7 eV to 3,2 eV)- concentration (Eg)grows rapidly. The dependence of HCL intensity on the forbid- den zone width can be explained by the action of electron - hol e pairs multiquontum generation mechanism. n1. The termal energy atoms and molecules trapped on surface are capa- ble to perform high-frecuency intermolecular and adsorbti onal oscillations. The adsorbtion potential depth of chemical active particle s on the uviol sur- faces variates from q= 1eVup to 10eV(the frecuencies correspondingly - fromω0= 1014s−1up to 1015s−1. One-three photon energy scattering into a crystal is a very effective process near the border of co ntinious en- ergy spectrum. The relaxation rate Γ vph= 108−1011s−1[1, 2]. Having released the energy ¯ hω0>> kT during the time-period (2 ÷5)Γ−1 vph, a par- ticle is caught by the surface, but at the same time it has a lar ge energy exess in its adsorbtion binding ( q−¯hω0≥¯hω0). The following energy re- lease into the crystalline lattice is inhibited by the multi quantum processes ((EV−Evi)/(¯hωph)≥3÷5; Γvph= 102÷107s−1; ¯hωph-phonon energy). In this case, the nonphonon relaxation processes of energy rel ease into an ad- sorbtion layer, to ionized surface states, or to the electro ns of impurity, Bloch and Tamm states are effective [3, 4]. 1Figure 1: Dependence of the pozition of luminiscence spec- trum maxima (1,2) and forbidden zone width (3) of ZnSCdS −Cu phosphor on the CdS concen- tration; 1- photoluminicence, 2-heterogeneous chemilumines- cence in the atomic hydrodgen.Figure 2: Dependence of the HCL intensits of the ZnSCdS − Cuphosphor on the CdSconcen- tration. Points - are the experi- mental results, the line represents the theoretical colculations. The role of the crystal electron states in the energy accomod ation process taking place in the gas-surface interaction is widely obser ved during lumines- cence of solids located into the active gas medium (free atom s, radicals).This kind of nonequilibrium luminescence is known to be called he terogeneous chemiluminescence HCl[5]. Two modifications of HCL are known: radicalo- recombination and adsorbtion luminescence ( RRL andAL) [5]−[7].RRL is observed in the free atoms recombination process, AL- in the process of adsorption. n2. This paper presents the experimental results of RRLofZnSCdS −Cu with the various cosentrations of CdS(0−40%), in the atomic hydrodgen medium. The atomic hydrodgen is produced by dissociation of the molec- ular hydrodgen during high-frecuency nonelectrode electr ic charge. In its turn, the molecular hydrodgen is produced by diffusion throu gh a heated palladium. Kinetic, temperature and spectral characteristic of lumin encence are stud- ied with the help of photoelectric amplifier ( PEA−84) attached to the out- put of a high-aperture monochromator, sometimes the interf erence filters are used. In Fig.1, position of spectrum maxima of photo and heterogen erous chemi- luminescence and the widths of forbidden zone Eg=Eg(ZnS)[1−C(CdS)]+ Eg(CdS)C(CdS) of phosphor ZnSCdS −Cuare given as functions of con- centration of CdS(C(CdS) = 0−40%). If can be noted that the rate of spectrum maxima and Eg(C) displayments are practically thesame. HCL 2intensity with respect to CdS- consentration( Egdecreases) grows rapidly (Fig.2). For theZnSCdS −Cuphosphor containing the variable quantities of CdS(0−40%) it is established the Cu2+-centre radiation spectrum is dis- placed to long wavelength (from 2 ,4eVto 1,9eV). It is caused by monotone lowering of the conductity zone bottom level with respect to the valence zone ceiling (from 3 ,7eVto 3,2eV), pozition of the Cu2+- centre with respect to the valence zone ceiling being the same (theory of indirect a ctivation [5]). The dependence of the RRL intensity of the ZnSCdS −Cuphospor on theCdSconcentration can be explained by the action of electron-ho le pairs multiquontum generation mechanism. n3. Because of the oscillation unharmonism and dependence o f the dipole (quadrupole) momentum from binding on the internuclear coo rdinates, the interaction between the oscillotory excited dipole and the crystall elerctron states leads to transmiision of several oscillatory quanta to electrons states at the same time. If the Morze potential is chosen to describe the unharmonic o scillator, then the rate of the multiquantum oscillatory electron tran sitions by the zone-zone excitations can be expressed [4] as follows Γev=4m2θ2f(mr¯hω0)1/2 ¯hω0Mm eEg[µ(r0)e(ε+ 2) 3a3/2ε]2ψ(q/E g)exp(−Eg ¯hω0P).(1) Here:me- mass of electron, e - elementary electrical charge, ω0=α(2q/m)1/2 - oscillator’s cyclic frequency, µ- dipole moment of binding, f - oscillatory force,ǫ- permittivity, corresponding to the transmission frequen cy, q - ad- sorbtion potential depth, Eg- width of forbidden zone, mr- equivalent ef- fective mass of an electron - hole pair, a -minimal distance o f the energy transportation. ψ(x) =x2(1−x−1/2)(1 + (2x)−1/2) (2) p=zlnz/(z−1),z= (4q+ ¯hω0)/(Eg+ ¯hω0). (3) (1) describes the oscillatory electron transition (inside the static region of a dipole) produced by the dipole interaction of a valence zone electron with the electromagnetic field of an unharmonic oscillator. To de scribe the dipole - quadrupole interaction, it is necessary to change the expr ession inside the rectangle parenthesises by [ eD(r0)/5a5/2]2. The (1) and (3) describing the exitation rate can be used to ev aluate the dependence of the phosphor ZnSCdS −Culuminiscence intensity on the CdS concentration (the width of the phosphor‘s forbidden zone) , (Fig.2). Intensity 3ofRRL Hdepends on the exitation cross - section [9] and is proportio nal to the rate of the nonequilibrium electron state generation: I∼Γev (Γev+ Γv)(1 +τω(σ2N1BRRL+σ1NBAl. (4) Here:σ1-adsorbtion cross-section, σ2- recombination cross - section, N,N 1- correspondingly concentration of ALandRPL exitation centres, BAL,BRRL - quantum yield of luminescence outputs of ALandRRL exitation centres, (1 +τω)−1- concentration extinguish factor, Γ v+ Γev- total relaxation rate, - atom flux density. These quantities does not (or in a rather small degree) depen d on the energy width Eg. For this situations according (1 −4) we get: Ic=a/E gΨ(q/E g)exp(−Eg ¯hω0P) (5) Eg= [3,6−1,1C(CdS)]eV (6) whereC(CdS) concentration CdSinside theZnSCdS −Cuphosphor. The theoretical curve I(C) coincides (in the limits of experimental errors) with the experimental results (see Fig.2).(¯hω0= 0,32eV,q = 4eV). The increment of I(C) is not exponential and depends strongly on the factor (1/Eg)Ψ(q/E g). When theCdSconcentration is great ( C >60%), theHCL output and intensity tend to be lower. It is caused by increasing of the c onsentration extinguish (factor (1 + τω)−1) and rate of the low - energy relaxation Γ vof the oscillatory exitation binding ( H−Me2+)v−SU,(H−H)v−SU. References [1] M.A.Koshushner. //Theoretical problems of chemical ph ysic. M.:”Science”, 1982. P.283. [2] V.P.Zhdanov V.P.,Zamaraev K.I. //Catal.Sci.Eng., 198 2. V.24. N3. P.273. [3] B.R.Shub. Heterogeneous relaxation of reactions chemi cal internal en- ergy molecules and heterogeneous processes at the solid sta te surface. Doct. diss. chem. science. M. :Inst.of chem.phys., 1983. [4] Tyurin Yu.I. //Surface, 1986. N9. P.115. 4[5] V.V.Styrov. Energy reactions heterogeneous chemical r elaxation with participation of crystall system electrons. Preprint 19-7 8. Novosibirsk. Inst.of semiconductor physics SO AN SSSR, 1978. [6] V.A.Sokolov, A.N.Gorban. //Luminescence and adsorbti on. M. :”Sci- ence”, 1969. P.188. [7] Yu.N.Ruphov. //Problems of kinetic and catalisys. M.:” Science”, 1978. V.17. P.63. [8] A.M.Gurvisch. Introduction at chemistry physic of crys tallophophors. M.:”High.sch.”, 1982. P.376. [9] Yu.I.Tyurin Yu.A., V.V.Styrov V.V. //Chem.phys. 1984. V.3. V.1. P.85. 5

arXiv:physics/0006004v1 [physics.optics] 5 Jun 2000Frequency Dependence of Polarized Radiation due to Spatial Correlations Krishna Bhuvalka and Pankaj Jain Department of Physics, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur-208 016, INDIA PACS: 42.25.Ja, 42.25.Kb,42.25.Hz Abstract: We study the polarization of light emitted by spatially correlated sources. We show that in general po- larization acquires nontrivial dependence on frequency du e to spatial correlations. The frequency dependence is found to be absent only for a special class of sources where the correlat ion length scales as the wavelength of light. We further study th e cross correlations between two spatially distinct points t hat are generated due to propagation. It is found that such cross correlation leads to sufficiently strong frequency dependen ce of polarization which can easily be measured experimentall y. In a series of interesting papers Wolf [1–3] showed that in general spectrum of electromagnetic radiation does not remain invariant under propagation, even through vac- uum. The effect arises if the source has spatial correla- tions. The phenomenon was later confirmed experimen- tally [4–6] and has been a subject of considerable interest [7,8]. Further investigations of the source correlation ef - fects have been done in the time domain theoretically [9] and experimentally [10]. Several applications of the effect have also been proposed [11–15]. In a related de- velopment it has been pointed out that spectral changes also arise due to static scattering [16–19] and dynamic scattering [21–25]. In a recent paper [26] it was shown that spatially cor- related sources lead to further nontrivial effects if the radiation is polarized. This was shown for the case of monochromatic emission. In the current paper we study the frequency dependence of this effect. We are inter- ested in sources where the emission from different points in the source are correlated i.e. the phase and ampli- tude shows systematic dependence on the position at the source. One physical example we have in mind is radia- tion from a plasma in the presence of background mag- netic field. The motion of charged particles at different spatial locations is in general correlated and will lead to spatially correlated radiation. Consider a spatially extended source of polarized ra- diation as shown in figure 1. The electric field vector /vectorE at a far away point Q, located at a distance R from the source, is given by, Ei(/vectorR,ω) =/integraldisplay d3rei(/vector r,ω)eikρ ρ(1) whereρis the distance of the observation point Qfrom the pointPon the source (see Fig. 1), Ei(/vectorR,ω) represent theθ,φcomponents of the electric field vector, measured at the point Qin a spherical polar coordinate system withOat its origin. The vector ei(/vector r,ω) specifies theamplitude and phase of the wave originating from any pointP(/vector r). We can compute the coherency matrix [27,8] at the point Q, Jij(/vectorR,ω) =<E∗ i(/vectorR,ω)Ej(/vectorR,ω)> =/integraldisplay d3rd3r′Wij(/vector r,/vector r′,ω)eik(ρ−ρ′) ρρ′(2) where the angular brackets represent ensemble averages. The cross correlation matrix Wij(/vector r,/vector r′,ω) is defined as Wij(/vector r,/vector r′,ω) =<e∗ i(/vector r,ω)ej(/vector r′,ω)> . SinceR>>r , we can replace ρandρ′in the denominator in Eq. 2 by R. The (ρ−ρ′) term in the exponent can be replaced by ˆ u·/vector∆, where/vector∆ =/vector r−/vector r′and ˆuis a unit normal in the direction of the observation point Qi.e. ˆu=/vectorR/R. rP OQ Rρ FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of spatially extended sourc e of polarized radiation and the observation point Qlocated at a distanceRfrom the source. Prepresents any point on the source located at position /vector rwith respect to the origin Oof the coordinate system and at a distance ρfrom Q. Wij(/vector r,/vector r′,ω) measures the correlations between two spatially distinct points. We are interested in studying the polarization at a point Qin the far zone when the cross correlation matrix has nontrivial dependence on /vector r and/vector r′. We consider only those sources such that the polarization of light emitted from a particular point P located at/vector ris independent of frequency. We therefore write, Wij(/vector r,/vector r,ω ) =S(ω)jij(/vector r) whereS(ω) is the spectrum of light emitted by any point on the source, and jijin general depends on /vector ri.e. the polarization of light emitted by different points on the 1source is not assumed to be same. If the spatially distinct points are independent then, Wij(/vector r,/vector r′,ω) =Nδ3(/vector r−/vector r′)S(ω)jij(/vector r) whereNis a normalization factor. In this case we find that the resultant matrix Jis given by Jij(/vectorR,ω) =NS(ω) R2/integraldisplay d3rjij(/vector r), i.e. an integral over the coherency matrix elements over the entire source. In this case we find, as expected, that the resulting polarization at Qis independent of frequency. In general we may express the matrix W(/vector r,/vector r′,ω) as, Wij(/vector r,/vector r′,ω) =NS(ω)j1/2 ii(/vector r)µij(/vector r,/vector r′,ω)j1/2 jj(/vector r′) whereµlm(/vector r,/vector r,ω ) =µlm(/vector r,ω) is the usual complex de- gree of coherence [27]. Substituting this into Eq. 2 we find that, in general, the polarization observed at the far away point Qdoes depend on frequency. In order to illustrate this with some simple examples we further specialize to sources for which the /vector ra= (/vector r−/vector r′)/2 and/vector∆ dependence factorizes, i.e. µlm(/vector r,/vector r′,ω) =µli(/vector ra,ω)ξim(/vector∆,ω). (3) We will consider only those sources for which µlm(/vector ra,ω) does not depend on ωwhich implies that polarization of light emitted from any point on the source is independent of frequency. In order to get oriented lets consider a very simple example, ξlm(/vector∆,ω) =f(∆,ω)δlm, i.e. it is proportional to an identity matrix upto an overall function of ∆. In this case we find that as long as jij depends on /vector rwe expect nontrivial polarization effects due to the cross correlation term. In particular this term will lead to a nontrivial dependence of polarization on frequency. The coherency matrix in the far zone can now be written as, Jij(/vectorR,ω) =NS(ω) R2/integraldisplay d3rad3∆gij(/vector ra,∆)f(∆,ω)eikˆu·/vector∆, where gij(/vector ra,/vector∆) =J1/2 ii(/vector r)µij(/vector r)J1/2 jj(/vector r′). We takef(∆,ω) to be gaussian i.e. f(∆,ω) = exp[−∆2/(2σ2)]/(√ 2πσ)3whereσin the correlation length and is in general a function of frequency. Assum- ing thatσis small we get dominant contribution only for small values of ∆. We therefore expand gij(/vector ra,/vector∆) in powers of/vector∆. Keeping only first derivative term, we findJij(/vectorR,ω) =NS(ω) R2e−σ2k2/2/bracketleftBigg/integraldisplay d3ragij(/vector ra,0) +iσ2kˆul/integraldisplay d3ra∂ ∂∆lgij(/vector ra,/vector∆)|∆=0/bracketrightBigg (4) The second term inside the brackets gives the leading order correction due to spatial correlations. If we take gij(/vector ra,/vector∆) to be real then the second term leads to cir- cularly polarized component. In this situation the radia- tion from each point is linearly polarized, however spatial correlations produce a circular polarization. In general we find that the state of polarization depends on fre- quency unless the source obeys a scaling law such that σ∝1/kandgij(/vector ra,/vector∆) = ˜gij(/vector ra,/vector∆k). For such sources there does not exist any fundamental length scale and the spatial correlation length is proportional to inverse of the frequency. In general we find that in this case the frequency dependence can be scaled out of the integral in Eq. 2 and the polarization is independent of frequency. This is analogous to the scaling law found by Wolf for sources which do not produce spectral shifts in the far zone. We next consider another special case in which the cross correlation matrix is independent of /vector raand depends only on the relative coordinate /vector∆. In this case we also expect nontrivial polarization effects as long as ξ(/vector∆,ω) in Eq. 3 is not proportional to an identity matrix. As expected in this case also the polarization depends on frequency unless the cross correlation matrix obeys the scaling law such that ξlm(/vector∆,ω) =ξlm(ω/vector∆) which allows us to scale ωout of the integral in Eq. 2 and the resulting matrix is independent of ω. We therefore find that the polarization in the far zone is independent of frequency only for sources which obey this scaling law, even if the coherency matrix Jevaluated for a particular pointPis independent of /vector r. Next we consider a specific example and calculate the frequency dependence arising due to correlations. We consider a planar circular source or radius a, which is spatially uncorrelated. The source emits polarized radi- ation such that its coherency matrix is given by, J(ρ,φ) =A/parenleftbigg sin2φ −sinφcosφ −sinφcosφ cos2φ/parenrightbigg (5) whereAis a constant and ρ,φare the polar coordinates of any point /vector r′on the source. The source luminosity is independent of position and the polarization vectors point along ˆφ. We point out that the source has been constructed such that at any point close to the axis of symmetry of the source the integrated polarization is zero i.e. the polarization vectors from different points in the source cancel one another. 2As is well known, although the source is uncorrelated, the cross correlation between any two points P1andP2 need not be zero due to the Van Cittert-Zernike theorem [8]. We consider the experimental arrangement shown in Fig. 2, where the light after being reflected from P1 andP2is observed at the point Q. We are interested in the frequency dependence of the polarization observed at Q. The cross correlation matrix between any two points P1(/vector r1) andP2(/vector r2) in the far zone close to symmetry axis of the source, is given by, Wij(/vector r1,/vector r2,ν) =/parenleftbiggk 2π/parenrightbigg2/integraldisplay d2r′Jij(/vector r′)e−ik(a/r)Lcos(φ−ψ) r2 (6) wherek= 2πν/c (ν= frequency, c= speed of light), Lcosψ=x2−x1,Lsinψ=y2−y1, (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) are the cartesian coordinates of the projections of /vector r1and /vector r2respectively on the plane of the source and r=r1=r2 is the distance of the point Oon the source from points P1 andP2which have been assumed to be placed symmetri- cally for simplicity. In obtaining Eq. 6 we have followed the treatment given in Ref. [8] for the calculation of cross correlation between two points P1andP2close to the symmetry axis of a spatially uncorrelated source. Lack of spatial correlation implies that the cross correlation matrix at the source Wij(/vector r′ 1,/vector r′ 2,ν) =Jij(/vector r′ 1,ν)δ2(/vector r′ 2−/vector r′ 1). We have further assumed that Jij(/vector r′ 1,ν) is independent of the frequency ν. Note that since we are interested in the frequency dependence of polarization we are working in frequency domain. The integral in Eq. 6 is over the source and we are using polar coordinates x′=ρcosφ andy′=ρsinφ. P1 φ P2Q O aρ z FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of a 2-D spatially extended source of polarized light. P1(/vector r1) andP2(/vector r2) are any points close to the axis of the source. After reflection from points P1andP2, light reaches the observation point Q, where its polarization is measured as a function of frequency. Due to spatial correlation between P1andP2, the polarization of light atQdisplays a nontrivial frequency dependence. Following the treatment given in [8] we can calculate the cross correlation matrix and hence the stokes param- eters at the point of observation. For the source underconsideration the result can be obtained analytically. We find, upto an overall common factor Aa2k2/2πr2 s0= 1 + 2J1(v)/v , s1=2 v2(y2−y1)2−(x2−x1)2 L2[vJ1(v)−2(1−J0(v)], s2=−4 v2(x2−x1)(y2−y1)[vJ1(v)−2(1−J0(v)], s3= 0 wherev=kLa/r . We therefore find that the wave is linearly polarized at the point of observation Qwith the degree of polarization given by, P= 2| −vJ1(v) + 2 −2J0(v)| v2+ 2vJ1(v) which has nontrivial dependence on frequency. The ori- entation of linear polarization, given by tan(2ψ) =2(x2−x1)(y2−y1) (x2−x1)2−(y2−y1)2, is independent of frequency. The calculated degree of po- larization for this example is plotted in Fig. 3. We clearly see that it is a very significant effect and can easily be observed experimentally. The orientation of linearly po- larized component depends on the positions of P1andP2 and contains information about the polarization profile of the source. 00.10.20.30.4 0 5 10 15 20P v (=kLa/r) FIG. 3. The degree of polarization Pat the observation pointQdue to the source model specified by Eq. 5 as a function of v=kLa/r . Herekis the wavenumber of light, L is the distance between points P1andP2(see Fig. 2), ais the radius of the primary 2-D source and ris the distance of the pointsP1andP2, assumed to be located symmetrically, from the center of the source. The 2-D source is spatially uncorrelated with uniform intensity and polarization vect ors pointing along ˆφat any point ( ρ,φ) on the source. 3The lack of frequency dependence of the linear po- larization happens only in this very special example. We next study a somewhat more complicated source for which the coherency matrix at any point /vector r′= (ρ,φ) is same as that given in Eq. 5, with φreplaced by φ+αρ, whereαis a parameter. In this case we numerically calculate the stokes parameter. The frequency depen- dence of the degree of polarization and the orientation of linear polarization is shown in Fig. 4 for some rep- resentative choices of the parameter α. The plot uses x2−x1= 1 andy2−y1=−0.2 in arbirary units. The state of polarization only depends on the dimensionless quantitiesv=kLa/r , (x2−x1)/L, (y2−y1)/Landαa whereL2= (x2−x1)2+ (y2−y1)2. We find that in this case both the orientation angle of the linear polarization and the degree of polarization show a dramatic variation with frequency, which can easily be observed experimen- tally. The stokes parameter s3vanishes in this case also showing that there is no circularly polarized component at the point Q. α= 1/aα= 3/a v (=kLa/r)2ψ Pα= 3/a α= 1/a -2024 0 5 10 15 20 00.10.20.30.4 0 5 10 15 20 FIG. 4. (a) The linear polarization angle ψand (b) the de- gree of polarization Pat the observation point Qas a function ofv=kLa/r . Herekis the wavenumber of light, L is the dis- tance between points P1andP2(see Fig. 2), ais the radius of the primary 2-D source and ris the distance of the points P1 andP2, assumed to be located symmetrically, from the center of the source. The primary 2-D source is spatially uncorre- lated with uniform intensity, with its polarization specifi ed by Eq. 5 with φreplaced by φ+αρ, whereαis a parame- ter. The polarization vectors make an angle αρwithˆφat any point (ρ,φ) on the source. We study two representive choices of the parameter α= 1/a,3/a. We conclude that spatially correlated sources of polar- ized radiation generically lead to frequency dependenceof the state of polarization. The frequency dependence is absent only in some very special circumstances. We have considered the cross correlation between two points lo- cated at a large distance from a 2-D uncorrelated source. This cross correlation is found to lead to a dramatic fre- quency dependence of the state of polarization which can easily be observed experimentally. [1] E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1370 (1986). [2] E. Wolf, Optics Communication 62, 12 (1987). [3] E. Wolf, Nature 326, 26 (1987). [4] D. Faklis and G. M. Morris, Opt. Lett. 13, 4 (1988). [5] F. Gori, G. Guattari, C. Palma and G. Padovani, Opt. Commun. 67, 1 1988). [6] G. Indebetouw, J. Mod. Phys. 36, 251 (1989). [7] For a review see E. Wolf and D. F. V. James, Rep. Progr. Phys.59, 771 (1996). [8] L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (1995), Cambridge University Press. [9] J. Rai, S. Rai and S. Chopra, Phys. Rev. A 47, 4400 (1993). [10] S. Chopra, S. K. P. Bhat, J. Joseph, S. Rai and J. Rai, Opt. Commum. 109, 205 (1994). [11] D. F. V. James, H. C. Kandpal and E. Wolf, Astrophys. J.445, 406 (1995). [12] H. C. Kandpal, K. Saxena, D. S. Mehta, J. S. Vaishya and K. C. Joshi, J. Mod. Opt. 42, 447 (1995). [13] S. Vicalvi, G. Shirripa Spagnolo, and M. Santarsiero, Opt. Commun. 130, 241 (1996). [14] E. Wolf, T. Shirai, H. Chen and W. Wang, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 1345 (1997). [15] T. Shirai, E. Wolf, H. Chen and W. Wang, J. Mod. Opt. 45, 799 (1998). [16] E. Wolf, J. T. Foley and F. Gori, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1142 (1989); erratum, 7, 173 (1990). [17] T. Shirai and T. Asakura, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 12, 1354 (1995). [18] T. Shirai and T. Asakura, Opt. Commun. 123, 234 (1996). [19] T. A. Leskova, A. A. Maradudin, A. V. Shchegrov and E. R. Mendez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1010 (1997). [20] A. Dogriu and E. Wolf, Opt. Lett. 23, 1340 (1998). [21] E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2220 (1989). [22] J. T. Foley and E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. A 40, 588 (1989). [23] D. F. V. James, M. P. Savedoff and E. Wolf, Astrophys. J.359, 67 (1990). [24] D. F. V. James and E. Wolf, Phys. Lett. A 146, 167 (1990). [25] D. F. V. James and E. Wolf, Phys. Lett. A 188, 239 (1994). [26] A. Agarwal, P. Jain and J. Rai, physics/9911073. [27] M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (1980), Perg- amon Press. 4

arXiv:physics/0006005v1 [physics.gen-ph] 5 Jun 2000On the Nature of Relativistic Phenomena Yong-Gwan Yi∗ October 23, 2012 Abstract In this paper it is shown that the relativistic equations of m otion follow quite directly from the aberration of starlight. Based upon this fact, the author not only reworks some of the established thought, but adds new in- sights to the understanding of relativistic phenomena. Phy sics, rather than mathematics, is emphasized for understanding the relativi stic phenomena. 1 Introduction The special theory of relativity is now believed to apply to a ll forms of interactions except large-scale gravitational phenomena. Daily it is em ployed by scientists in their consideration of precise atomic phenomena, in nuclea r physics, and above all in high-energy physics. It serves as a touchstone in modern p hysics for the possible forms of interaction between fundamental particles. Howev er, it was resisted for many years because of the second postulate on which the theor y is based. The second postulate, which states that the speed of light is ind ependent of the motion of its source, destroys the concept of time as a universal var iable independent of the spatial coordinates. Because this was a revolutionary and u npalatable idea, many attempts were made to invent theories that would explain all the observed facts without this assumption. This work is another such attempt. The argument begins by poi nting out that the physics of relativistic phenomena can be looked upon as h aving its origin in the aberration of starlight, leading to a phenomenological der ivation of the relativistic equations of motion. It will be shown that this alternative p oint of view is rather natural for describing the physics of relativistic phenome na. It should be noted that the proposed interpretation is based upon the Galilean concept of time and is consistent with the observed facts of importance related to the special theory of relativity. This paper will show how the interpretation can be fitted into the frame- work of modern physics. However, it is not intended to be a dis cussion concerning the general theory of relativity. ∗Han-Shin Apt. 121-402, Dobong-dong Dobong-ku, Seoul, 132- 012 Korea 12 Ether Drift We consider the well-known experiments related to the speed of light in a moving medium [1]. The Michelson-Morley experiment was undertake n to investigate the possible existence of the ether drift. In principle, it cons isted merely of observing whether there was any shift of the fringes in the Michelson in terferometer when the instrument was turned through an angle of 90◦. The negative result shows that it is impossible to demonstrate the existence of the ether drif t. This was interpreted as demonstrating the absence of the ether drift. However, it could have been due to the experiment itself being incapable of demonstrating t he ether drift. Fizeau performed an important experiment to determine whet her the speed of light in a material medium is affected by motion of the mediu m relative to the source and observer. In the Fizeau experiment, an altera tion of the speed of light was observed, which was in reasonable agreement with t he value given by Fresnel’s dragging formula. From a comparison of the Fizeau experiment with the Michelson-Morley experiment, we realize that the arrangem ent of the Michelson- Morley experiment makes it impossible to detect the ether dr ift. In the Michelson- Morley experiment, both the source and the observer are at re st while the ether is in uniform motion through the arrangement. As viewed from the F izeau experiment, the ether drift cannot be defined in this arrangement. The cir cumstances are the same as for the Earth, whose motion cannot be defined without a n extraterrestrial reference. Even if the Michelson-Morley experiment is perf ormed, for example, in water flowing rapidly in one direction, the null result is exp ected since the velocity of the water flow cannot be defined in this arrangement. In the c ase of sound under the same circumstances, no change of pitch was observed, as i t should be [2]. We should mention the Michelson-Morley experiment perform ed with an ex- traterrestrial light source. Apparently, the motion of the light source relative to the half-silvered mirror is ineffective in changing the interfe rence pattern. As shown in the Michelson interferometer, only the motion of the half-s ilvered mirror relative to one of the other two mirrors can give rise to an effect on the int erference fringes. It is clear that the point of splitting into two beams plays the r ole of an effective source in that interferometer. The experiment using sunlight diffe rs from the original in the domain of taste rather than coverage, if any. 3 Twin Paradox In 1905, Einstein showed that the Lorentz transformation wh ich preserves the speed of light in all uniformly moving systems requires revision o f the usual concepts of time and simultaneity [3]. He was thus led to the result that a moving clock runs more slowly than a stationary clock. However, such a concept of time gives rise to the twin paradox. In mechanics, it is impossible by means o f any physical mea- surements to label a coordinate system as intrinsically “st ationary” or “uniformly moving”; one can only infer that the two systems are moving re lative to each other. According to this fundamental postulate, like velocity and distance, time must also be symmetric with respect to the two systems. This is what the twin paradox points out. 2We consider the experiments performed to verify the phenome non of time dila- tion. The mean lifetime of π−mesons was determined using the decay of π−mesons at rest in a scintillator [4]. In this method, the mean lifeti me of the π−mesons was determined by a direct measurement of the time required t o decay. In order to investigate the phenomenon of time dilation, an attempt t o measure the mean lifetime of a rapidly moving π−meson beam was undertaken [5]. An experiment of this nature was arranged to measure the attenuation in flight of aπ−meson beam of known lifetime using a scintillation counter telescope o f a variable length. The measured mean free path was divided by the mean velocity to ge t the mean life- time. The mean lifetime thus obtained, when the Lorentz time dilation was taken into account, was in fair agreement with the data measured in the rest system ofπ−mesons. It is generally recognized that these experiments h ave verified the phenomenon of time dilation. However, the latter experiment has an ambiguous bearing on t he phenomenon of time dilation. In that experiment, the relativistic corr ection was made directly in the mean lifetime, keeping the particle velocity intact. This is otherwise without example in high-energy physics experiment, where the relat ivistic correction has been made in the form of the four-velocity. The four-velocity is defined as the rate of change of the path o f a particle with respect to its proper time. Based upon this definition, one ca n say that the four- velocity results from the Lorentz time dilation, and hence t hey are compatible. However, it is evident that the current definition disregard ing the dilation of its proper path is not consistent with experimental fact. Obser vation of the dilated mean free path of π−meson beam with respect to its proper lifetime points out tha t once the Lorentz time dilation is taken into account, there i s no room for the four- velocity formulation. Either the time dilation or the four- velocity, not both of them, can be consistent with experimental observation. This mean s that the time dilation and the four-velocity are alternatives, so that the four-ve locity cannot result from the Lorentz time dilation. In this regard, the question aris es: In time and velocity, which component would appear dilated to the observer phenom enologically? To see the truth, the mean lifetime of a rapidly moving π−meson beam must be determined by direct measurement. The mean lifetime so determined will be the same as the data measured in the rest system of π−mesons if what the twin paradox points out is correct. Although such an experiment was probably undert aken, there does not seem to be a publication that describes the experiment of thi s kind. In spite of this, we can infer the result from a comparison with astronomical o bservation. In 1971, Shapiro observed that the components making up the n ucleus of radio source 3C279 were in motion. Surprisingly, the speed of the c omponents was esti- mated to be about ten times the speed of light [6]. The activit y, which occurs on a scale of milliseconds of arc, could not have been detected wi th the techniques avail- able before the early 1970s. Special attention was immediat ely given to observation of the mysterious phenomenon, from which some other quasars such as 3C273 also turned out to be superluminal sources. From direct observat ions of the distances traveled and the times required, it is reported that their nu clei contain components apparently flying apart at speeds exceeding the speed of ligh t. The concept of the speed of light as a limiting speed of material particles, whi ch has been confirmed in physics, has been questioned in astrophysics. 3The only difference would be their stages and their interpret ations therein. On the comparison of the experiment with the observation, we co me to see that, phe- nomenologically, the velocity component itself would appe ar dilated to the observer, keeping the time intact. It is certain therefore without req uiring explicit experiment that the mean lifetime of a rapidly moving π−meson beam obtained by direct mea- surement is equivalent to the mean lifetime in the π−rest system. This constitutes a verification of the prediction of equal ageing of the twins i n relative motion and thus resolves the twin paradox. It confirms fully that the phe nomenon of time di- lation is nothing else but illusion existing only in mathema tical formalism. From a logical point of view there is no a priori reason to attach an y absolute reference of the phenomenon to one system in preference to the other sys tem as long as it depends only on the relative velocity between them. Ironica lly the relativistic expla- nation violates the relativity of uniformly moving systems and artificially obscures the physics of the situation they reveal. 4 Aberration of Starlight The Bradley observation of the aberration of starlight seem s to be even more impor- tant to modern physics than previously thought. This is beca use the aberration of starlight can be interpreted as expressing the covariant eq uations of motion leading to the physics of relativistic phenomena. The phenomenolog ical point of view that the origin of relativistic phenomena lies in the physics of a berration of starlight is discussed in this section. In 1727, Bradley discovered an apparent motion of the star wh ich he explained as due to the motion of the Earth in its orbit. This effect, know n as aberration, is quite distinct from the well-known displacements of the n earer stars known as parallax. The effect of parallax is to cause the stars which ar e observed in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the Earth’s orbit to move in sma ll circles, and from their angular diameters the distances of the stars are compu ted. Aberration, which depends on the Earth’s velocity, also causes the stars obser ved in this direction to appear to move in circles. Here, however, the circles are the same for all stars, whether near or distant. Bradley’s explanation of this effec t was that the apparent direction of the light reaching the Earth from a star is alter ed by the motion of the Earth in its orbit. The observer and his or her telescope are b eing carried along with the Earth at a velocity of about 29 km/s, and if this motio n is perpendicular to the direction of the star, the telescope must be tilted sligh tly toward the direction of motion from the position it would have if the Earth were at r est. The reason for this is much the same as that involved when a little girl walki ng in the rain must tilt her umbrella forward to keep the rain off her feet. Let the vector vrepresent the velocity of the Earth relative to a system of coordinates fixed in the solar system, and cthat of the light relative to the solar system. Then the velocity of the light relative to the Earth h as the direction of c′, which is the vector difference between candv. This is the direction in which the telescope must be pointed to observe the star image on the axi s of the instrument. When the Earth’s motion is perpendicular to the direction of the star, the relation c′2−v2=c2follows from the vector difference. Setting c′=k(v)c, this means 4that the observation is performed at speed c′greater than when the Earth is at rest. Keeping in mind that the speed of light can be a measure o f speed, the altered speed of observation is conjectured to give rise to t he same effect as would be the case if the velocity scale were correspondingly alter ed at the moment of observation. Accordingly, the velocity of the Earth is cons idered to be v′=k(v)vin relation to the observation. Taking this velocity of the Ear th, the Bradley relation becomes c′2−v′2=c2, from which we can obtain in a closed form the velocity scale k(v) = 1/(1−v2/c2)1/2(≡γ). The appearance of the γ−factor as the velocity scale has nothing to do with relativity but rather is of a purely obs ervational nature. As a consequence of this consideration, the relations for the a ngle of aberration αcan be written as sinα=β,cosα= (1−β2)1/2,tanα=β/(1−β2)1/2, (1) where β=v/c. At this point it may be of some interest to check the difference between the present interpretation and the relativistic explanation o f the aberration of starlight. In the present interpretation, the velocity of the Earth and the velocity of light relative to it are respectively assumed to be γvandγc, while the velocity of light relative to the solar system at rest is c. If the distance from the star to the solar system is R, the distance to the Earth is given by R/cosα=γR, and the time required to reach the Earth is R/c. These assumptions are in contrast with those in the relativistic explanation. In the relativistic expla nation, the velocity of the Earth and the velocity of light relative to it are vandc, whereas the velocity of the solar system at rest is assumed to be c/γ[7]. Thus, in the relativistic explanation, the time required to reach the Earth is given by γR/c. The difference can be seen by noting that both the light path reaching the Earth in the ab erration of starlight and the propagation path perpendicular to the ether drift in the Michelson-Morley experiment can be represented by the same geometric figure. W hen viewed from the present interpretation, the result of the Michelson-Mo rley experiment depends solely on whether the speed of light is affected while traveli ng the path parallel to the ether drift. This is why comparison has been made with the Fizeau experiment in section 2. It is interesting to note that in spite of their d ifference, both of interpretations give the same relations for the angle of abe rration. Having revealed the hidden nature of the Bradley observatio n, we are now in a position to discuss its effect on the equation of motion. From the vector difference between c′andv′for the velocity of light, a derivative with respect to time g ives the covariant equation of accelerations dc′ dt−dv′ dt=dc dt= 0. (2) The scalar product of the accelerations in this equation wit h the corresponding velocity vectors is written c′dc′ dt−v′dv′ dt= 0,that is, cd(γc) dt−vd(γv) dt= 0. (3) Equation (3) can also be obtained by differentiating the Brad ley relation c′2−v′2= c2with respect to time. The kinetic energy Tis defined in general to be such 5that the scalar product of the force and the velocity is the ti me rate of change of T. In comparing (3) with the definition of T, the relativistic expression of kinetic energy T=mc2/(1−β2)1/2is seen [8]. In the present discussion, the mass has been treated as a constant [9]. The Bradley relation c′2−v′2=c2can therefore be expressed in terms of the kinetic energy and momentum, which is seen to be the covariant energy-momentum equation with T2/c2−p2=m2c2. This shows how the relativistic equations of motion can be derived on Newtonia n mechanical grounds. Since the aberration effect is attributed to the finite veloci ty of observation which is affected by motion of the Earth, it is thought that relativi stic phenomena would appear due to the measurement velocity being affected by velo city of a moving body, like a vector difference between velocities. This explains w hy relativistic phenomena appear more pronounced as the velocities of particle approa ch the velocity of light and why the velocity of light appears in the equations of moti on of material particles. The conjecture naturally arises: Is then the relativity effe ct just an effect due to the measurement velocity being affected by velocity of a movi ng body? Understood as such, relativistic physics is identified itself as denoti ng the branch of physics which takes into consideration even the measurement veloci ty relative to the particle velocity for a moving particle with velocity not small compa red with the velocity of light. In this regard, a particle speed as fast as or faster than light, apart from the possibility of existence, is unobservable in a direct wa y because such a particle goes beyond the observation speed. We suppose that the Earth is uniformly moving with velocity vwith respect to the solar system. For simplicity, let the origins of the coor dinates of the Earth and the solar system be coincident at time t= 0, at which time the star emits a pulse of light. If this pulse of light reaches the solar system at a t imet, the propagation paths of the light to the solar system and the Earth are respec tively given by R=ct andR′=c′t. Let xandx′be the respective projections of RandR′along the direction of v. Then the geometric figure of the aberration of starlight giv es c2t2−x2=c′2t2−x′2(4) It is straightforward to generalize the discussion to the tw o inertial reference frames SandS′with a relative velocity vbetween them, instead of the solar system and the Earth. The Bradley observation of the aberration of star light suggests taking c′t as a fourth coordinate in place of ct′as used in the Lorentz relation. The fact that the geometric figure of the aberration of starlight draws the covariant equation of coordinates seems to me to form the physical background for t he point of view that the origin of relativistic phenomena lies in the physics of a berration of starlight. The Bradley relation in equation (4) stands in contrast with the Lorentz relation leading to the Lorentz transformation with respect to the co ncepts of time and the speed of light. In these relations, which relation is consis tent with the experimen- tal facts? The Bradley relation describes the simultaneous arrival of light signals starting from the star at the two points xandx′in relative motion. In contrast, the Lorentz relation finds a complete interpretation in a spr eading spherical wave which starts from the star and reaches the point xat time tand the point x′at time t′sequentially. Figure 1 shows the difference between the Brad ley relation and the Lorentz relation. Recalling the Doppler effect, there is no d oubt that the velocity 6of light is not independent of the motion of its source. The in variance of the veloc- ity of light in all uniformly moving systems, which plays so d ecisive a role in the Lorentz transformation, has an ambiguous bearing on the exp erimental facts. To be consistent with observation for the aberration of starli ght, the Doppler shift, and the Michelson-Morley experiment, the current explanation should be replaced by the restricted, but more accurate, explanation that the vel ocity of light appears the same in all uniformly moving systems if and only if the source and the observer are both in a given system. It is then apparent that the Lorentz re lation has no bearing on the two systems in relative motion. In this regard, the Lor entz transformation turns out to be a result of an ill-conceived marriage. The fourth component of the Lorentz transformation is worth y of mention. The four coordinates in the Earth can be related to those in the so lar system by the Lorentz transformation using equation (4) instead of the Lo rentz relation. The fourth component of this transformation is written c′t=ct−vx/c (1−β2)1/2orc′=c(1−β·n) (1−β2)1/2, (5) where nis a unit vector in the direction of R. Since the ratio between xandct is the direction cosine of the propagation path of the light w ith respect to v, it can be expressed in the more familiar form of the Doppler shif t formula. It is of particular interest to note that the fourth component of thi s Lorentz transformation gives a more general derivation of the relativistic formula for the Doppler shift. Consequently it leads us to consider the transverse Doppler shift as due to the aberration effect, and thus as observed in the direction incl ined at the angle of aberration toward the direction of motion of a moving source . We can also give a more general derivation of the expression f or the angle of aberration. The ratio between the xcomponent and the fourth component of this transformation can be written using the direction cosines s o defined as x′ c′t=γ(x−vt) γ(ct−vx/c)or cos θ′=cosθ−β 1−βcosθ, (6) which is the same expression as obtained in its most general f orm by Einstein. It has been shown algebraically that two successive Lorentz transformations with velocity parameters β1andβ2are equivalent to a single Lorentz transformation of parameter β= (β1+β2)/(1+β1β2), by multiplying the matrices of the two separate transformations. But the ratio between the components can a lso be used to obtain the law for addition of velocities. As it stands, the structu re of (6) makes it obvious that the formula for the addition of velocities is given simp ly by rewriting ratios of coordinates to time in uniform velocity terms. 5 Aberration of Fields We turn our attention to the gravitational field of the star. O ne approach begins by noting that there would be an aberration of the field becaus e of its finite prop- agation velocity. If the gravitational field propagates wit h the velocity of light, the gravitational field must suffer aberration, just as light doe s. It is then found that 7the aberration of the starlight expresses aberration of the gravitational field of the star. Letvbe the velocity of the Earth with respect to the solar system a ndRbe the radius vector from the star to the solar system. If the sta r is in a direction perpendicular to the motion of the Earth, the length of the pa th along which the light propagates to the Earth is given by R/cosα=R/(1−β2)1/2, where αis the angle of aberration. The gravitational field of the star can t herefore be written in terms of the retarded and present positions of the moving Ear th as /bracketleftbiggGM R2/bracketrightbigg t−R/cand/bracketleftbiggGM(1−β2) R2/bracketrightbigg t, (7) where Mis the mass of the star. In this equation, the subscript means that the quantity in the bracket is to be evaluated at that time. The gr avitational field at the point of observation at time tis determined by the state of motion of the Earth at the retarded time t−R/c, for which the time of propagation of the light from the star to the field point just coincides with R/c. Equation (7) describes the aber- ration of the gravitational field occuring during the propag ation. The alterations in the direction and the magnitude of the gravitational field are attributed to the propagation velocity of the field as affected by the motion of t he Earth during its propagation. We can extend this to the case where the star is not in a directi on perpendicular to the motion of the Earth. The propagation path of the light t o the Earth is then given by R′=R(1−β·n)/(1−β2)1/2, where nis a unit vector in the direction of R. The aberration of the gravitational field can therefore be ex pressed in the general form GM(1−β2) R2(1−β·n)2. (8) If we take the path of integration to be R′, the distance from the star to the field point at which we determine the potential, we obtain for the g ravitational potential at the point of observation GM(1−β2)1/2 R(1−β·n). (9) Since the alteration of the gravitational field of the star is ascribed to motion of the Earth during its propagation, one may picture from a vect or difference between fields that the gravitational field acting on the Earth differs from that when the Earth is at rest by acceleration which the moving Earth has du ring propagation. The aberration of the gravitational field is then described b y the equation GM R3R=GM R′3R′+dv′ dt. (10) The explicit form of potential energy in (9) is furnished by t he scalar product of the gravitational fields in (10) with the corresponding ra dius vectors. It should be noted that the derivation of potential energy is performe d in exactly the same manner as in the covariant equation of accelerations for kin etic energy. Equations (2) and (10) can therefore be considered as covariant formul ations of Newton’s equations of motion for describing relativistic mechanics . 8Following the same line of reasoning, the aberration of the C oulomb field pro- duced by a moving electron can be expressed in the form of (8) b y replacing the gravitational charge GMby the electronic charge e.The electric field thus obtained is similar to the Coulomb field of an electron in uniform motio n in electrodynamics. We now compare the Li´ enard-Wiechert potential with the pot ential given in this approach:/bracketleftbigge R(1−β·n)/bracketrightbigg t−R/c,/bracketleftbigge(1−β2)1/2 R(1−β·n)/bracketrightbigg t. (11) Since the relation of the retarded position to the present po sition of a moving elec- tron is not, in general, known, the Li´ enard-Wiechert poten tial ordinarily permits only the evaluation of the field in terms of retarded position and velocity of the electron. In the present approach, the unknown effect occuri ng during the propaga- tion is assumed to be the aberration of the field attributed to its finite propagation velocity, which is affected by motion of the electron. As appl ied to a moving source of light, the propagation path of light to the observer, when it is written in terms of frequency, yields an expression equal to the relativisti c formula for the Doppler shift. This favors the assumption that the unknown effect occ uring during the propagation is the aberration of the Coulomb field produced b y a moving electron. In electrodynamics, the electric field of a moving electron d ivides itself into “a velocity field,” which is independent of acceleration, and “ an acceleration field,” which depends linearly upon acceleration. The velocity fiel d is essentially static field, whereas the acceleration field is typical radiation fie ld. In the present ap- proach, the Coulomb potential alone induces the velocity fie ld. Thus to make this approach agree with the electric field of a moving electron in electrodynamics, the vector potential should be deduced solely from the radiatio n field. On the assump- tion that the relativistic correction to the velocity compo nent of vector potential involves the cancellation of the factor (1 −β2)1/2arising from the propagation path, this deductive reasoning leads to the following forms of exp ression for the vector potential: e c/bracketleftbiggv R(1−β·n)/bracketrightbigg t−R/c,e c/bracketleftbiggv−(v·n)n R(1−β·n)/bracketrightbigg t. (12) It suggests that the component of the velocity perpendicula r tonplays the role of an effective velocity in the evaluation of the vector potential . From this point of view, we realize that the component of the velocity parallel to nhas been incorporated in the propagation path of the fields. Taking into account thi s geometrical image of the velocity, it seems sensible to expect that the vector pot ential of (12) expresses an effect occuring during its propagation. Moreover, the vec tor potential describes the transverse field in the intuitive forms [n·A]t= 0,Erad=−1 c/bracketleftbigg∂A ∂t/bracketrightbigg t=e c2/bracketleftbiggn× {(n−v)×˙ v} R(1−β·n)2/bracketrightbigg t. (13) When this is compared to the familiar result in electrodynam ics, a factor of (1−β·n) is smaller than that. However, the general form of the power is given by the time integral of radiation emitted by the charge at the re tarded time and, in the time integration, the relation between the retarded and present times dtret= 9dt(1−β·n) has been used [10]. Therefore, the electric field of (13) lea ds to the same form as the general expression for the energy detected a t an observation point. As a result, it is seen that this deductive scheme for the vect or potential lends itself to incorporation in the classical theory of radiation. So far the aberration of radial fields has been discussed, not hing has been said about the physical significance of the aberration of uniform fields. We now consider the motion of an electron perpendicular to a uniform magneti c field H. Because the motion of the electron influences the velocity of propaga tion of the field, the apparent direction of the field acting on the electron will be tilted at an angle of aberration toward the direction of motion of the moving elec tron. Thus the angle at the field point between the field and the velocity of the electr on would be π/2−α, instead of being π/2, where αis the angle of aberration. The equation of motion under such a field is therefore mv2/r=ev/c×H= (evH/c )sin(π/2−α). By using the relation in (1), we can obtain the well-known expre ssion for the cyclotron frequency ( eH/mc )(1−β2)1/2, showing a new way of deriving and understanding the cyclotron frequency. Insight into the apparent velocity of charged particle can b e provided by con- sidering the mechanism by which the velocity of the particle is determined. An electrostatic spectrograph to determine the velocity of an electron consists in bal- ancing the magnetic and electric deflections against each ot her [11]. The electron moving in a uniform magnetic field H, perpendicularly to H, describes a circular path of radius RH. If this electron moves in a radial electric field E, it can describe a circular path of radius RE. The equation of motion for the electron moving in the fields HandEapplied simultaneously is then given by balancing the centr ifu- gal force arising from the magnetic deflection against the ce ntrifugal force due to the electric deflection, by eERE=ev/c×HRH(=mv2). Taking into account the aberration occuring in the form of the vector difference betw eenvandH, the angle at the field point between vandHwould be π/2−α, instead of being π/2. Thus, the equation of motion is given by cER E=vHR Hsin(π/2−α), from which the apparent velocity of the electron is found to be cER E/HR H(1−β2)1/2, instead of being cER E/HR H, where β= (ERE/HR H). In this regard, cER E/HR H, gener- ally recognized as the velocity of the electron, is seen to be the velocity the electron would have if the velocity of propagation of the fields were in finite, thereby not suffering aberration. In fact, the apparent speed of high-en ergy particles of γvis frequently superluminal phenomenologically. The apparen t particles’ speeds must be a result of the fields being affected by the motions of partic les rather than that of time dilation. This effect, discussed as aberration of fiel ds, furnishes physical support for the previous conclusion that, phenomenologica lly, a particle velocity itself would appear dilated to the observer, keeping its tim e intact. It is then only natural that the concept of time is to be recovered. 6 Covariant Equations of Motion One may ask whether there is a change in form of the equations o f motion due to the velocity of propagation of fields. In passing we remark th at aberration of a field draws covariant formulation of the field equation. We are now going to examine the 10essential changes in physical outlook due to the velocity of propagation of fields. Let us consider two moving systems, SandS′, with a relative velocity between them. From (10) we find that the gravitational fields acting on the respective systems can be related to each other by equating the fields on t he left: /bracketleftbiggGM R3R+dv dt/bracketrightbigg S=/bracketleftbiggGM R3R+dv dt/bracketrightbigg S′. (14) Similarly, for electromagnetic fields, /bracketleftbigg eE+ev c×B−F/bracketrightbigg S=/bracketleftbigg eE+ev c×B−F/bracketrightbigg S′. (15) The formulations suggest an obvious generalization of the e quations of motion when the velocity of propagation of the fields is taken into consid eration. Together with the covariant energy-momentum equation [ T2/c2−p2]S= [T2/c2−p2]S′, they show how physical phenomena appear the same in uniformly moving s ystems. Consid- ering only the motion of S′relative to S, Eq. (14) goes over into the form of (10). In mechanics, the Lagrange equation is derived from D’Alemb ert’s principle. But one may also approach the Lagrangian formulation by way of Ha milton’s principle and attempt simply to find a function Lfor which the Euler-Lagrange equations, as obtained from the variational principle, agree with the kno wn relativistic equations of motion. It is usually not difficult to find a function satisfy ing these requirements. However, the present approach requires in addition that the Lagrange equation should be written in such a way as to conform to the form of (14) or (10). A covariant formulation of the Lagrange equation should ther efore have the form /bracketleftbigg∂L ∂r−d dt/parenleftbigg∂L ∂˙r/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg S=/bracketleftbigg∂L ∂r−d dt/parenleftbigg∂L ∂˙r/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg S′. (16) This means that Hamilton’s principle is written covariantl y as /bracketleftBig δ/integraldisplay L dt/bracketrightBig S=/bracketleftBig δ/integraldisplay L dt/bracketrightBig S′. (17) If we further ask for the covariant formulation for the canon ical equations of Hamil- ton, we can predict in the same manner /bracketleftbiggdr dt−∂H ∂p/bracketrightbigg S=/bracketleftbiggdr dt−∂H ∂p/bracketrightbigg S′,/bracketleftbiggdp dt+∂H ∂r/bracketrightbigg S=/bracketleftbiggdp dt+∂H ∂r/bracketrightbigg S′.(18) The first half of the Hamilton’s equations seems to be a covari ant formulation in dynamical variables of the vector difference between candvfor the velocity of light. Continuing along these lines, in the Maxwell equations, we c ome to transforma- tion equations of electromagnetic fields. As an example, we c onsider the fields seen by an observer in the system Swhen a point charge qmoves by in a straightline path along the xdirection with a velocity v. Let S′be the moving coordinate system of q. The charge is at rest in this system. But when viewed from the laboratory, the 11charge represents a current J=qvin the xdirection. Amp` ere’s law can then be written in the covariant form /bracketleftbigg ∇ ×B=4π cJ+1 c∂E ∂t/bracketrightbigg S=/bracketleftbigg ∇ ×B=1 c∂E ∂t/bracketrightbigg S′. (19) Theyandzcomponents of (19) are homogeneous equations. If we apply to these homogeneous equations the Lorentz transformation of coord inates with [ γ(ct− βx), γ(x−vt), y, z]S= [ct, x, y, z ]S′, we obtain in the system Sthe equations ∂Bx ∂z′−∂ ∂x′/braceleftbigg γ/parenleftbigg Bz−v cEy/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg =1 c∂ ∂t′/braceleftbigg γ/parenleftbigg Ey−v cBz/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg , (20) ∂ ∂x′/braceleftbigg γ/parenleftbigg By+v cEz/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg −∂Bx ∂y′=1 c∂ ∂t′/braceleftbigg γ/parenleftbigg Ez+v cBy/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg . (21) The covariance of these components of equation under the Lor entz transforma- tion was explicitly shown by Lorentz and Einstein [12]. But i t would seem that the covariance of its xcomponent was assumed implicitly. Its explicit transforma tion can proceed as follows: “We may write the xcomponent of this equation, using Coulomb’s law ∇ ·E= 4πq, as ∂Bz ∂y−∂By ∂z=v c(∇ ·E) +1 c∂Ex ∂t. (22) By multiplying this equation with γ, we are led to ∂ ∂y′/braceleftbigg γ/parenleftbigg Bz−v cEy/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg −∂ ∂z′/braceleftbigg γ/parenleftbigg By+v cEz/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg =1 c∂Ex ∂t′(23) when we take into consideration the inverse Lorentz transfo rmation of coordinates with [ ct, x, y, z ]S= [γ(ct+βx), γ(x+vt), y, z]S′.” The inverse equations differ from the Lorentz transformation equations only by a change in the sign of v, andγ−factor is symmetric with respect to the two systems in relative moti on. In the above equation the inverse transformation equations have been us ed merely as another mathematical connection between the two sets of coordinate s. Consequently, the explicit equations of transformation are Ex′=Ex, B x′=Bx, Ey′=γ(Ey−βBz), B y′=γ(By+βEz), Ez′=γ(Ez+βBy), B z′=γ(Bz−βEy).  (24) Faraday’s law and ∇ ·B= 0 can be used equivalently to obtain these equa- tions of transformation. This completes the demonstration of the covariance of electrodynamics. It should be emphasized that the transfor mation equations of electromagnetic field can also be obtained in an explicitly c ovariant form directly from the Maxwell equations themselves without using the tra nsformation properties of the field-strength tensor of rank two. It is remarkable that Eq. (15) is in agreement with the relati on between fields which was obtained when formulated Faraday’s law of inducti on. In putting Fara- day’s law in differential form, we have found that the electri c fieldE′in a coordinate 12frame moving with a velocity vrelative to the laboratory is E′=E+v/c×B, where EandBare the fields in the laboratory. This is consistent with what Eq. (15) describes in a manifestly covariant form between fields in th e laboratory and the moving coordinate system of circuit. 7 Conclusion The discussion in this paper shows that aberration of starli ght is interpreted as expressing the covariant equations of motion leading to the physics of relativis- tic phenomena. This suggests that the origin of relativisti c phenomena lies in the physics of aberration of starlight. While the relativistic explanation is induced by mathematical formalism, the present interpretation is d educed from physical phenomenon. The present interpretation so deduced stands i n contrast with the relativistic explanation with regard to the concepts of tim e and the speed of light. We have seen that this alternative point of view also constru cts a way of deriving familiar results. Furthermore it leads us to an understandi ng of relativistic phe- nomena using a unified concept. This is obviously in contrast with the relativistic explanation that has given rise to much controversy. In cont roversy, the incorrect argument is in Einstein’s theory of relativity, which is fou nded upon the physically inconsistent concepts of time and simultaneity, not in oppo nents’ minds pointing them out. Paradoxically, the correct results of the theory h ave aggravated the situ- ation since they led contrary to accept the physically incon sistent concepts therein as the most consistent together with the correct mathematic al results. The theory of special relativity so developed is a result of confusion c oming from mixing up the notions, consistent and inconsistent. References [1] F. T. Jenkins and H. E. White, Fundamentals of Optics (McGraw-Hill, 1976) 4th ed., Chap.19. [2] J. W. S. Rayleigh, The Theory of Sound (Dover, 1945), Vol.2, p.155. [3] H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowsky, and H. Weyl, The Principle of Rel- ativity (Dover, 1952), p.37. [4] M. Jakobson, A. Shulz, and J. Steinberger, Phy. Rev. 81, 894 (1951); C. E. Wiegand, Phy. Rev. 83, 1085 (1951). [5] R. P. Durbin, H. H. Loar, and W. W. Havens, Jr., Phy. Rev. 88, 179 (1952). [6] A review article in a Korean journal, “Quasar’s Jet, Fast er Than Light?” Science (1984). [7] W. K. H. Panofsky and M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism (Addison-Wesley, 1962), 2nd ed., p.303. [8] H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, 1950), p.202. 13[9] C. G. Adler, Am. J. Phys. 55, 739 (1987); L. B. Okun, Physics Today (June 1989), p.31. [10] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley & Sons, 1975), 2nd ed., p.668. [11] M. M. Rogers, A. W. McReynolds, and F. T. Rogers, Jr., Phys. Rev. bf 57, 379 (1940). [12] Reference 3, p.11; p.37. 14✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓✓☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛☛star O x x′c′t ct✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓✓☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛☛star O x x′ct′ct Figure 1: Illustration of the Bradley relation and the Loren tz relation 15

arXiv:physics/0006006v1 [physics.gen-ph] 5 Jun 2000Optical Approach to Gravitational Redshift Yong-Gwan Yi∗ September 4, 2013 Abstract This paper explores an optical interpretation of the gravit ational redshift effect, and shows how the deflection of light and the radar echo delay can b e calculated from the point of view of optics. As a result of these considerations, this w ork establishes new relation- ships between general relativity and geometrical optics wi th regard to the propagation of light in the gravitational field, introducing an optical met ric - the optical version of the Schwarzschild metric. 1 Introduction The general theory of relativity is now accepted as the most s atisfactory theory of gravita- tion. This acceptance rests partly on its conceptual and str uctural elegance, and partly on its agreement with experimental observation. But the theory ha s been essentially mathematical in character, being concerned with the consequences of a “ge ometrization” of the space-time manifold. Thus the application of the theory involves the us e of special mathematical methods which, although relevant to optics in many cases, may easily be considered separately from it. In attempting to deduce their optical nature, one may pass fr om the mathematical language to the physical language, and see how they can be reconciled wit h each other. Four classic tests are usually cited as experimental verific ations of the general theory of relativity: the gravitational redshift of spectral lines, the deflection of light by the Sun, the precession of the perihelion of the orbit of the planet Mercu ry, and the time delay of radar echoes passing close to the Sun. Three of these tests examine the influence of the gravitational potential on the propagation of light. Only the planetary or bit precession investigates the motion of a particle of finite mass in the gravitational field o f the Sun. Because these are optical phenomena, one may raise a question as to whether the three classic tests can also be correctly inferred from the point of view of optics. It is actually possible to predict these tests in a valid mann er on the basis of optics. This paper explores an optical version of gravitational redshif t, and shows how the deflection of light and the radar echo delay can be calculated therefrom. I t will be of particular interest to note that the deflection of light and the radar echo delay can a lso be correctly derived from the equation of rays of geometrical optics without using the geo desic equations or the field equations of general relativity. As a consequence of these considerat ions, this paper will establish new relationships between general relativity and geometrical optics, apparently unrelated areas of physics, with regard to the influence of the gravitational po tential on the propagation of light. ∗Han-Shin Apt. 121-402 Dobong-dong Dobong-ku, Seoul, 132-0 12 Korea 12 Redshift of Spectral Lines In 1911, Einstein [1] predicted the change in the frequency o f spectral lines with gravitational potential, generally referred to as the gravitational reds hift. The effect was calculated from the time dilatation in a gravitational potential which follows from the principle of equivalence. The argument, as Einstein explains, was as follows: “Let the two points SandS′be placed at rest, a distance hapart along the lines of force in a uniform gravitational field of acceleration g. In accordance with the principle of equivalence, we are able, in place of the system Kin this gravitational field, to set the gravitational-free system K′which is accelerated with ( g. Consider the process of propagation of radiation from StoS′from a system K0, which is to be free from acceleration. At the moment when the radiatio n of frequency fis emitted from StoS′, let the velocity of K′relative toK0be zero. The radiation will arrive at S′when the time h/chas elapsed to a first approximation. But at this moment the velocity of S′relative to K0isv(gh/c. Therefore, by Doppler’s principle, the radiation arriving at S′does not possess the frequency fbut a greater frequencyf′which is related to fto a first approximation by the equation f′=f/parenleftbigg 1 +v c/parenrightbigg =f/parenleftbigg 1 +gh c2/parenrightbigg . (1) By the equivalence of KandK′, we may replace ghby the gravitational potential if the same process takes place in the system K.” Astronomical observations, though somewhat ambiguous, ha ve tended to confirm this effect. Since it does not seem possible to predict this interesting e ffect without using the general theory of relativity, the gravitational redshift is now rec ognized as resulting from the principle of equivalence. However, contrary to the current recogniti on, it would always seem possible to find a natural expression for the gravitational redshift fro m the optical point of view. If one seeks to introduce an optical nature of the gravitational re dshift, one’s attention should be given to the velocity v(gh/c, not to the principle of equivalence. At least phenomenolog ically, the effect would appear to be due to this change of velocity which t he radiation experiences during the propagation along the lines of force of the gravitationa l field. Looking for a Newtonian mechanical interpretation of it, one finds without difficulty that it is equal to the velocity difference due to the medium or fluid which the radiation exper iences during the propagation between the places at different gravitational potential. Letρbe the density and φbe the gravitational potential with g=−∇φ. A pressure uniform throughout a fluid mass produces no effect on the motio n. The time rate of change of the momentum of fluid is equal to and opposite to the pressure g radient force in the medium. If we calculate the velocity difference due to the medium or flu id with differing gravitational potential according to dv dt=−gor∇φ, (2) we obtain the same velocity as that in (1). This leads to a simp le physical interpretation of it: the redshift effect is attributed to the relative velocity ch ange due to the medium or fluid by which light is affected during propagation in the medium. Suc h an interpretation, in contrast with its relativistic explanation, can be fitted into the cus tomary point of view of optics, in that it ascribes the effect to an optical phenomenon related t o the velocity of propagation of light in a non-uniform medium. Consequently, it leads us to c onsider the redshift effect as being purely optical in origin. In fact, it is difficult to dist inguish a physical difference in form 2and content between the present interpretation and Einstei n’s argument here quoted. There is thus no objection in principle to interpreting the redshi ft result from the present point of view. Although Einstein further explained it as due to the ti me dilatation between the clocks in different gravitational potentials, what he had found was phenomenologically no more than the fact that the velocity of light is altered, linearly to a fi rst approximation, by the medium as a result of the pressure gradient force. A difference of interpretation already existed at the first ti me of observation [2]. Jewell in 1897 and particularly Fabry and Boisson in 1909 found displa cements of solar spectral lines toward the red end of the spectrum, and ascribed them to an effe ct of pressure in the absorbing layer. However, Einstein’s theory of general relativity [3 ] in 1916 established in most physicist’s minds the interpretation of the redshift effect as the time di latation in a gravitational potential, and this rather unusual interpretation has survived until t he present. Like most relativistic explanations, the current interpretation is presented in t he context of the four-vector space- time approach. The present approach reopens the question of interpretation and reminds us of the effect of pressure on the redshift of solar spectral lin es. This means that, apart from the gravitational potential, any change in mechanical pres sure, density and temperature of the medium can also give rise to an effect of the same kind on the red shift of spectral lines. To be reconciled with general relativity, however, vacuum in opt ics should be understood as a vacuum without even gravity. In order to complete the present description, it is necessar y to consider the hydrodynamic equation. The hydrodynamic equation is d dt/parenleftbig ρv/parenrightbig =∇/parenleftbig ρφ/parenrightbig − ∇P+Fv+1 cJ×B. (3) In addition to the gravitational force and pressure terms, w e have included viscous and magnetic forces. As the Sun consists of a conducting medium with a magn etic field, it is necessary to include the magnetic force term in the hydrodynamic equatio n, leading to the magnetohydro- dynamic equation. In the limit of very large conductivity, i t is convenient to relate the current density Jto the magnetic induction Bvia Ampere’s law. If we use the vector identity and neglect viscous effects, the hydrodynamic equation takes th e form d dt/parenleftbig ρv/parenrightbig =∇/parenleftbigg ρφ−P−B2 8π/parenrightbigg +1 4π/parenleftbig B· ∇/parenrightbig B. (4) Since the time required for light to propagate a path drisdr/cto a first approximation, the integration of (4) gives v(r) =1 c/parenleftbigg φ−P ρ−B2 8πρ/parenrightbigg +1 4πρc/integraldisplay/parenleftbig B· ∇/parenrightbig Bdr (5) for the relative change of velocity in the medium which light experiences during propagation along the path. The velocity of light at the point of observat ion thereby becomes c′(r) =c/bracketleftbigg 1 +v(r) c/bracketrightbigg =c/bracketleftbigg 1 +1 c2/parenleftbigg φ−P ρ−B2 8πρ/parenrightbigg +1 4πρc2/integraldisplay/parenleftbig B· ∇/parenrightbig Bdr/bracketrightbigg , (6) as compared with its velocity cat the moment of emission. By Doppler’s principle, it can be written in terms of frequency as f′(r) =f/bracketleftbigg 1 +1 c2/parenleftbigg φ−P ρ−B2 8πρ/parenrightbigg +1 4πρc2/integraldisplay/parenleftbig B· ∇/parenrightbig Bdr/bracketrightbigg . (7) 3According to the present approach, the redshift effect is att ributed not to the time dilatation between clocks in different gravitational potentials but to the velocity of propagation of light as affected by the medium as a result of pressure gradient incl uding gravitational potential. This optical interpretation is consistent with the fact tha t such a redshift effect is absent in the spectrum lines of an atom due to the Coulomb potential of the a tom. An optical approach to the redshift effect may shed additiona l light on the formulation and particularly on its relation to property of the medium of pro pagation. From the point of view of electromagnetic waves, light wave in (6) can be thought of as a wave in a medium with an index of refraction given by c′(r) =c/n(r). Thus 1 n(r)= 1 +1 c2/parenleftbigg φ−P ρ−B2 8πρ/parenrightbigg +1 4πρc2/integraldisplay/parenleftbig B· ∇/parenrightbig Bdr. (8) This consideration illustrates how the present picture of r edshift offers a natural connection with the framework of optics. To reconcile optics and general rel ativity, as previously remarked, a vacuum must be understood to exclude fields of any kind. It has a consequence which is of fundamental importance for describing the deflection of lig ht and the radar echo delay from the point of view of optics. Terrestrial measurements are usually made with respect to a coordinate system fixed in the Earth, which rotates uniformly with a constant angular v elocityωrelative to the inertial system. To an observer in the rotating system, it therefore a ppears as if the medium is moving under the influence of an effective acceleration of gravity [4 ] geff=g−2(ω×v)−ω×(ω×r). (9) The apparent gravitational force acting on the medium is the sum of the actual gravitational force, the Coriolis force and the centrifugal force. After t his consideration, we must replace φ by an effective potential φeffwithgeffin the case of a rotating system. The redshift effect was qualitatively in agreement with astr onomical observations both in the case of the Sun and in the case of white dwarf star like Sirius B where the effect is about thirty times larger. However, the quantitative agreement was not v ery good. While the frequency shift in (1) is independent of the point of observation on the solar disk, observations [5] have shown that the wavelength of spectral lines increases as the point of observation moves toward the limb. Furthermore, the solar lines observed at the limb a re definitely asymmetric, having pronounced red flanks. There seems to be a systematic change i n profile as one approaches the limb. In atomic spectra [6], the broadening of a spectrum lin e due to pressure has shown that the spectrum line observed is spread out more on the long wavelen gth side than it is on the short. With increasing pressure, the mean collision time increase s and the time between collisions decreases with the result that, as the line is shifted to the r ed, it is broadened asymmetrically. From this point of view, the asymmetry observed in limb lines seems to be of pressure character. In fact, Blamont and Roddier [7] found a complete interpreta tion of their experimental value at the limb when they added to the gravitational redshift the pressure redshift of the Lindholm effect. Assuming this to be so, their interpretation, as well as asymmetric profile, has reminded us of the effect of pressure on the redshift of solar spectral l ines, furnishing support for the present approach. In contrast to astronomical observations, terrestrial exp eriments using Mossbauer effect are able to test the gravitational redshift to an excellent accu racy. In the experiments [8], γ−rays in a nuclear resonance passed through an evacuated tube or a t ube filled with helium along the lines of force of the gravitational field, and yielded res ults that were in agreement with the predicted shift in (1) after subtraction of the effect due to t he temperature difference between the source and absorber. A measurement of redshift in a rapid ly rotating system [9] was shown to fit the dependence of geffonωin (9). 43 Light Bending near the Sun The general theory of relativity states that light rays prop agated across a gravitational field undergo deflection. The theoretical value for the deflection of light rays that just graze the Sun’s surface is 1.75′′. The deflection angle is classically measured by comparing t he apparent positions of stars that happen to lie near the solar disk duri ng an eclipse, when their light comes close to the Sun and yet may be detected, with their positions at night six months earlier, when these stars lie on opposite sides of the Earth from the Sun, so their light does not pass close to the Sun on its way to us. In eclipse of 1919, about a dozen sta rs in all were observed, and yielded values 1 .98±0.12′′and 1.61±0.31′′, in substantial agreement with Einstein’s prediction. It is perhaps this dramatic result more than any other succes s that brought general relativity to the attention of the general public. In radio astronomy, it is possible to measure the deflection o f radio signals by the Sun with potentially far greater accuracy than is possible in op tical astronomy. Each October, the quasi-stellar source 3C279 is occulted by the Sun, and radio astronomy groups have taken this opportunity to measure the change in relative position of tw o discrete radio sources, 3C273 and 3C279, during the period before and after occultation. The o bserved deflections are separable combination of the general relativistic effect and of refrac tion in coronal electron plasma. For example, at radio frequency of 2388 MHz [10], the maximum pos sible values of refractivities are 10−6and 5×10−7at 4R⊙for the general relativistic effect and the coronal electron plasma, respectively, where R⊙denotes the radius of the Sun. On the other hand, the coronal e lectron plasma can be virtually ignored at frequencies of 8000-1000 0 MHz [11]. Hence, at frequencies of 2000-4000 MHz, it is necessary to analyze the data in terms of a model, in which part of deflection arises from general relativity, and the rest is pr oduced by the corona. The Schwarzschild metric, appropriate for the region exter ior to a spherically symmetric distribution of mass M, is given in the standard form as c2dτ2=/parenleftbigg 1−2GM c2r/parenrightbigg c2dt2−/parenleftbigg 1−2GM c2r/parenrightbigg−1 dr2−r2(dθ2+ sin2θdϕ2). (10) In what follows, we use for the components of the metric tenso r the expressions g00(r) = 1/grr(r) = 1−2GM/c2r. Assuming that the whole motion takes place in the plane ϕ= 0, we obtain as the equations of motion three differential equat ions. For light rays propagating along the geodesic lines, we replace the parameter τby a parameter sdescribing trajectory. In particular, Weinberg [12] chooses to normalize sso that g00cdt ds= 1 ing00cdt ds= constant. (11) On the normalization condition he has combined the three diff erential equations into one dif- ferential equation, which is of the same structure as (10). A ccording to Weinberg, the change inθasrdecreases from infinity to its minimum value r0is given by △θ=r0/integraldisplay ∞/bracketleftbiggg00(r0)r2 g00(r)r2 0−1/bracketrightbigg−1/2g1/2 rr(r)dr r. (12) This integral can be evaluated by expanding in the small para metersGM/c2randGM/c2r0to first order, giving 4 GM/c2r0for a light ray deflected by the Sun. Having reviewed the deflection of light by the Sun, we now turn our attention to optics. The gaseous layers surrounding the Sun, through which light pro pagates, are media of spherically symmetric varying refractive index. The deflection of light can thus be thought as a result of 5the refraction of light in such gaseous layers from the point of view of optics. If this thought is reasonable, a similar conclusion will also be reached fro m this point of view. When we check the propagation of light rays to this end, we realize that the equation of rays of geometrical optics has previously had the form of (12). In a homogeneous medium, the refractive index is a constant a nd the light rays have the form of straight lines. Let us consider rays in a medium which has spherical symmetry, i.e. where the refractive index depends only on the distance rfrom a fixed point O: n=n(r). This case is approximately realized by the Earth’s atmosphere, w hen the curvature of the Earth is taken into account. The light rays are then plane curves, sit uated in a plane through the origin, and along each ray satisfy n(r)rsinψ= constant, (13) whereψis the angle between the position vector rand the tangent at the point ron the ray [13]. Since ψ=π/2 at the point r0of closest approach of the ray to the origin, Eq. (13) may also be written as n(r0)r0=constant. This relation is sometimes called the formula of Bouguer in geometrical optics. If ( r,θ) are the polar coordinates of a plane curve, then the angle ψ between the radius vector to a point ron the curve and the tangent at ris given by sinψ=rdθ (dr2+r2dθ2)1/2. (14) From (13), (14), and Bouguer’s formula, the equation of rays in a medium with spherical symmetry has been written in the form △θ=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbiggn2(r)r2 n2(r0)r2 0−1/bracketrightbigg−1/2dr r. (15) At first sight, we can see a striking resemblance between this well-known equation and the geodesic equation (12). In the equation of rays is absent a te rm arising from the difference in path length. For lack of the term, the equation of rays corr esponds to the case which is obtained when the curvature of the physical space in a region of strong gravitational potential is neglected. According to general relativity, the deflecti on of light is due partly to the varying velocity of light and partly to the non-Euclidean character of the spatial geometry. Since these are known to contribute equally to the deflection [14], it can therefore be stated that the equation of rays will give a deflection of only half of the corr ect value. This result is to be expected on optical grounds, because the non-Euclidean character of the spatial geometry has been neglected in optics. In order t o compensate for the change in light path due to gravitational potential, one can use the no tion of optical path. The optical path represents the distance light travels in a vacuum in the same time it travels a distance in the medium. If a light ray travels in a medium with spherica l symmetry, the optical path is given by integral over n(r)dr. This means that the radial interval of integration must be corrected by multiplication with n(r) to take into account the difference in path length due to gravitational potential. Upon integration over n(r)drinstead of the original integration over dr, it would yield a result in which the effect arising from the di fference in path length is taken into consideration. Using the optical path to correct the ch ange in light path, the equation of rays is modified to △θ=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbiggn2(r)r2 n2(r0)r2 0−1/bracketrightbigg−1/2n(r)dr r. (16) The modified equation of rays is then in complete agreement in structure with (12). From the proposition which has just been proved, one may picture what it is to be a curved space in a 6region of strong gravitational potential. When viewed from the present point, the curvature of the physical space in the gravitational field of the Sun can be st be understood in terms of the medium with spherical symmetry in which the path of rays is to be curved. A comparison of (16) with (12) identifies n2(r) withgrr(r). In the equation of rays of geometrical optics, n2(r) plays exactly the same role grr(r) has played in the geodesic equation of general relativity. This suggests introducing an optica l metric tensor n2(r) consisting of the gravitational potential plus the mechanical pressure and t he magnetic pressure. Taking only the leading gravitational potential into account, both of t hese equations give the same result for the deflection of light by the Sun. Thus the optical metric here proposed complements the Schwarzschild metric to this extent. Its line element will t hen be reconciled with the eikonal equation. The most important is that the existence of the defl ection of light and its value can also be derived in the explicit form on the basis of geometric al optics. The emphasis should be on the fact that the deflection of light can be interpreted as a result of the refraction of light in the gaseous layers surrounding the Sun. If we further include a frequency-dependent dielectric con stant defined by Maxwell’s equa- tionǫ(ω) =n2(ω), we can obtain the explicit and integrated form of the optic al metric and exhibit completely its frequency dependence. Using (8) and the dielectric constant with ǫ(0) =n2(0), we find far above the highest resonant frequency n2(r,ω) =ǫ(ω)n2(r) =/parenleftbigg 1−4πe2N mω2/parenrightbigg/bracketleftbigg 1+1 c2/parenleftbigg φ−P ρ−B2 8πρ/parenrightbigg +1 4πρc2/integraldisplay/parenleftbig B·∇/parenrightbig Bdr/bracketrightbigg−2 ,(17) wheremandeare the mass and charge on the electron, and Nis the total number of electrons per unit volume. Using this optical metric in (16) will provi de a theoretical curve in the explicit and integrated form for observation that any beam o f radiation is deflected during its passage near the Sun as a result of the general relativistic e ffect and of refraction in the coronal electron plasma. Since the characteristics of the propagat ion obviously depend on the index of refraction n(ω), it seems very natural to expect the frequency dependence o f the deflection so discussed. In fact, Muhleman, Ekers, and Fomalont [10] an alyzed their experimental data by using geometrical-optics techniques in a spherically sy mmetric refracting medium of index n(r,ω) = 1 + 2GM/c2r−2πe2N(r)/mω2, whereN(r) is the electron-density profile in the corona and interplanetary medium. Their interpretation is qualitatively in agreement with the present approach. 4 Radar Echo Delay In 1964, Shapiro [15] proposed a fourth test of general relat ivity. The test involves measuring the time delays between transmission of radar signals from E arth to either Mercury or Venus and detection of the echoes. Because, according to the gener al theory of relativity, the speed of propagation of light depends on the strength of gravitati onal potential along its path, the time delays are maximum when the inner planets are at superio r conjunction and the radar signals just graze the solar limb. The maximum round-trip ex cess time delays are estimated to be about 200 µsec. Such a change, equivalent to 60 km in distance, could be m easured over the required path length with modern radar equipment by Shapiro and his collaborators [16]. The most reliable of the measured data agree, on the average, wit h this excess delay predictions of general relativity to well within the experimental uncerta inty of ±20%. 7According to Weinberg, the time required for light to go from r0tor′is given by △t=r′/integraldisplay r0/bracketleftbigg 1−g00(r)r2 0 g00(r0)r2/bracketrightbigg−1/2/parenleftbigggrr(r) g00(r)/parenrightbigg1/2dr c. (18) The integral can be evaluated by expanding in the small param etersGM/c2randGM/c2r0to first order, giving 240 µsec for the maximum round-trip excess time delay. We are now in a position to derive an optical form of expressio n for the excess time delay. Its explicit form will follow from an equation which specifie s the path of rays. An accurate expression we seek can then be obtained by converting the equ ation of rays into an equation for the path of rays. A procedure starts from (14). Substitution of (14) into (13) gives n(r)r2dθ (dr2+r2dθ2)1/2= constant. (19) Since the path of rays is ds= (dr2(r2dθ2)1/2in the polar coordinates of plane curve, this may also be written as n(r)r2dθ ds= constant. (20) Solving for ds, we have ds=n(r)r2dθ n(r0)r0. (21) In the above equation, Bouguer’s formula n(r0)r0=constant has been used. By making use of the integral in (15), the variable of integration can be chan ged fromdθtodr, thereby obtaining the result: △s=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg 1−n2(r0)r2 0 n2(r)r2/bracketrightbigg−1/2 dr. (22) Hence, by dividing dsbyc′(r) =c/n(r), the time of propagation of rays is found to be △t=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg 1−n2(r0)r2 0 n2(r)r2/bracketrightbigg−1/2n(r)dr c, (23) wherec′(r) is the speed of propagation of light in a region of gravitati onal potential. Although the details are altered by the new form of expression, the opt ical characteristics of (23) remain the same as in (15). Thus, for the correct calculation of exce ss time delay, we must consider in addition the difference in the path of rays due to gravitation al potential. As discussed in the equation of rays for the deflection, this r equires integrating the resulting equation along the optical path. However, it draws a clear di stinction between geometrical optics and general relativity, because (23) has already man ifested the form of the integral over the optical path. To be reconciled with general relativity, in addition to the varying velocity of light with gravitational potential, the difference in pat h length must also be taken into consideration. If we make a correction in the radial compone nt of the path of rays, that is, in the component of the path along the lines of force of the gravi tational field, the integral in (23) becomes △t=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg 1−n2(r0)r2 0 n2(r)r2/bracketrightbigg−1/2n2(r)dr c. (24) The modified integral and that in (18) are again in complete ag reement in structure. There is indeed no difference, to first order in GM/c2randGM/c2r0, between (18) and (24). This 8once again identifies n2(r) withgrr(r) in their roles, leading us to consider n2(r) as an optical metric tensor and thus to reconcile its eikonal equation wit h the line element. It is apparent that the equation of rays of geometrical optics also predict s the radar echo delay in exactly the same form as given by the geodesic equation of general relati vity. 5 Plasma Effect of Corona Having established new relationships between general rela tivity and geometrical optics, we can now discuss the classic tests of general relativity from the point of view of optics. In particular, the present approach affords a straightforward way to calcul ate the plasma effect of the solar corona on the deflection of light and the radar echo delay. Sim ultaneous equivalently accurate measurements at various frequencies will allow the plasma e ffect to be deduced, since the plasma effect is frequency dependent and the general relativistic e ffect is not. The plasma effect of the solar corona is evaluated in this section. As a first important example of the plasma effect of the solar co rona, we consider the deflec- tion of light as a combination of the general relativistic eff ect and of refraction in the coronal plasma. The expected angular deflection can be accurately co mputed using the frequency- dependent refractive index expressed in (17) in the equatio n of rays (16): △θ=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbiggn2(r,ω)r2 n2(r0,ω)r2 0−1/bracketrightbigg−1/2n(r,ω)dr r. (25) In order to evaluate this integral, we use in the integrand ex pansions in the small parameters. It is both easier and more instructive to evaluate the integr al after the expansions. The calcu- lations can be carried to first order in the small parameters w ith high accuracy. We now carry out the integration of (25). The argument of the square root in (25) can be expanded to first order in the small param- eters as n2(r,ω)r2 n2(r0,ω)r2 0−1≃r2 r2 0/bracketleftbigg 1 +2GM c2/parenleftbigg1 r−1 r0/parenrightbigg −4πe2 mω2/parenleftbig N(r)−N(r0)/parenrightbig/bracketrightbigg −1 ≃/parenleftbiggr2 r2 0−1/parenrightbigg/bracketleftbigg 1−2GMr c2r0(r+r0)+4πe2r2 mω2(r2 0−r2)/parenleftbig N(r)−N(r0)/parenrightbig/bracketrightbigg ,(26) so (25) gives △θ≃/integraldisplay/parenleftbiggr2 r2 0−1/parenrightbigg−1/2dr r/bracketleftbigg 1+GM c2r+GMr c2r0(r+r0)−2πe2N(r) mω2−2πe2r2/parenleftbig N(r)−N(r0)/parenrightbig mω2(r2 0−r2)/bracketrightbigg .(27) Consequently, the deflections from the individual effects ar e combined linearly. Refraction effect in the solar corona is now represented by δθc≃/integraldisplay/parenleftbiggr2 r2 0−1/parenrightbigg−1/2dr r/bracketleftbigg2πe2N(r) mω2+2πe2r2/parenleftbig N(r)−N(r0)/parenrightbig mω2(r2 0−r2)/bracketrightbigg . (28) This must be an addition to the general relativity deflection . In the Allen-Baumbach model [17], the electron-density pro file in the corona is assumed to have the form N(r) = 1.55×108(R⊙/r)6electron/cm3. Using more recent results on the corona, Erickson [18] found that N(r) = 5×105(R⊙/r)2electron/cm3represents the data reasonably well from 4 R⊙to 20R⊙. Refraction effect is significant where r <3R⊙, at which 9the (R⊙/r)6term dominates. Hence we use the electron distribution of th e Allen-Baumbach model, resulting in δθc≃6.24×1015 f2/integraldisplay/parenleftbiggr2 r2 0−1/parenrightbigg−1/2dr r/bracketleftbigg/parenleftbiggR⊙ r/parenrightbigg6 +r2 r2 0−r2/parenleftbigg/parenleftbiggR⊙ r/parenrightbigg6 −/parenleftbiggR⊙ r0/parenrightbigg6/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg .(29) The integration for δθcis straightforward, and gives δθc≃6.24×1015 f2/parenleftbiggR⊙ r0/parenrightbigg6/bracketleftbigg105 48θ+57 48cosθsinθ+11 24cos3θsinθ+1 6cos5θsinθ/bracketrightbigg ,(30) where cosθ=r0/r. The total change in θasrdecreases from infinity to its minimum value r0and then increases again to infinity is just twice its change from ∞tor0, that is, 2 △θ. Hence the deflection of the path of rays from a straight line is given by δθ= 2△θ−π, which is calculated positively if concave toward the Sun and negatively if convex. Putting i n the numerical factors, the total deflection is δθ≃1.75′′/parenleftbiggR⊙ r0/parenrightbigg −6.24×1015 f2/parenleftbigg105π 48/parenrightbigg/parenleftbiggR⊙ r0/parenrightbigg6 . (31) Equation (31) describes interesting behavior of the radiat ion bending near the Sun. The first term represents the general relativistic effect by whic h the path of rays is bent toward the Sun. The second term represents the coronal refraction b y which the path of rays is bent away from the Sun to the contrary. This is not surprising when we see the difference in sign between these terms. Actually, experimental values at radi o frequencies of the general relativity deflection were determined by fitting, by the method of least s quares, the measured data to curve of a model bearing difference of sign between these effec ts. At optical frequencies, coronal refraction is extremely small, so it can be neglected. Howev er, at radio frequencies, it plays an important part in the deflection, as can be seen when we illu strate the deflection angle as a function of frequency for the distances in solar radii of th e ray’s point of closest approach to the Sun’s center. The question might be raised as to whether varying velocity o f light in the coronal plasma also gives rise to a change in path length therein. If we assum e that varying velocity of light in the coronal plasma does not give rise to a change in path lengt h of rays therein, the radial interval of integration must still be corrected by multiplication wi thn(r) even in the coronal plasma, not withn(r,ω) as used in (25). We must then drop the fourth term in the integ rand of the integral in (27), that is, the first term in (28). Coronal refraction th us obtained will be exactly the same as what one finds by evaluating the original equation of rays ( 15) on purely optical grounds. Note that there is a complete agreement in the form of express ion for the plasma effect between (15) and (25) with such an assumption. In fact, the evaluatio n of coronal refraction from the equation of rays (15) was carried out to first order by Bracewe ll, Eshelman, and Hollweg [19]. Their calculation gives 82( R⊙/r0)6sec for the angular deviation of a ray of frequency 9.6 GHz in the corona assuming the Allen-Baumbach model. When Erick son’s coronal model is instead assumed, the angular deviation is given by 0 .14(R⊙/r0)2sec. Seielstad, Sramek, and Weiler [11] used in data analysis these values as parameters descri bing refraction effects in the solar corona, when they measured the deflection of 9.602 GHz radiat ion from 3C279 in the solar gravitational field using an interferometer at the Owens Val ley Radio Observatory. The results of their calculation are indeed in exact agreement with what we would obtain from each model if we excluded the first term from the integrand of the integral i n (28) under such a consideration. However, on the assumption that varying velocity of light in the coronal plasma also gives rise to the change thereby in path length of rays, Eq. (31) gives co ronal refraction of 96( R⊙/r0)6sec 10for 9.6 GHz frequency. If we used Erickson’s coronal model, w e would obtain coronal refraction of 0.21(R⊙/r0)2sec. To say it in terms of the metric tensor here proposed, the difference of calculation can be viewed in a way that is very helpful in prov iding physical insight into the term arising from the difference in path length. In (31), we ha ve used the metric tensor of the components g00= 1/ǫ(ω)n2(r) andgrr=ǫ(ω)n2(r). (32) As viewed from the present approach, their calculation corr esponds to the case which is obtained when the components of the metric tensor are g00= 1/ǫ(ω)n2(r) butgrr=n2(r) or 1. (33) The reason for this difference is readily understood by refer ring to the equations of rays (16) and (15) from which angular deviations were respectively ca lculated. As a second example of the plasma effect, let us calculate the p lasma effect of the solar corona on the radar echo delay. The time required for light to go fromr0tor′is given by (24). To evaluate the dependence of the radar echo delay on th e frequency being propagated, we must consider (24) with the frequency-dependent refract ive index in (17): t(r0,r′) =r′/integraldisplay r0/bracketleftbigg 1−n2(r0,ω)r2 0 n2(r,ω)r2/bracketrightbigg−1/2n2(r,ω)dr c. (34) In order to evaluate this integral, we once again use in the in tegrand the expansions in the small parameters to first order. Proceeding in exactly the sa me way as for (25), Eq. (34) gives t(r0,r′)≃r′/integraldisplay r0/parenleftbigg 1−r2 0 r2/parenrightbigg−1/2dr c/bracketleftbigg 1+2GM c2r+GMr 0 c2r(r+r0)−4πe2N(r) mω2−2πe2r2 0/parenleftbig N(r0)−N(r)/parenrightbig mω2(r2−r2 0)/bracketrightbigg . (35) The time required for radar signals to travel to Mercury and b e reflected back to Earth is 2[t(rE,r0) +t(r0,rM)], whererEandrMare astronomical radii of the orbits of the Earth and the Mercury around the Sun. The round-trip excess time de lay is then given by δt= 2[t(rE,r0) +t(r0,rM)−T(rE,r0)−T(r0,rM)], whereT(rE,r0) andT(r0,rM) are the times required for radar signals to travel the paths in straight li nes at speed c. The distance r0of closest approach of the radar wave to the center of the Sun is m uch smaller than the distances rEandrMof the Earth and Mercury from the Sun. Assuming the electron distribution of the Allen-Baumbach m odel, the integral yields δt≃4GM c3/bracketleftbigg 1 + ln/parenleftbigg4rErM r2 0/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg −6.24×1015 f2/parenleftbigg21πr0 4c/parenrightbigg/parenleftbiggR⊙ r0/parenrightbigg6 . (36) If, instead, we use Erickson’s coronal model, we then have δt≃4GM c3/bracketleftbigg 1 + ln/parenleftbigg4rErM r2 0/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg −2.01×1013 f2/parenleftbigg6πr0 c/parenrightbigg/parenleftbiggR⊙ r0/parenrightbigg2 . (37) As in the case of the deflection, because of the sign difference , the plasma effect of the solar corona on the time delay is opposite to what is usually expect ed from the general relativistic effect. For either equation, the positive terms on the right d escribe a general relativistic delay in the time it takes a radar signal to travel to Mercury and bac k. In contrast, the negative terms describe a coronal plasma contraction, that is, a rada r time contraction. Equations (36) 11and (37) describe frequency dependence of round-trip exces s time delay for the distances of closest approach of the radar wave to the center of the Sun. We now compare Shapiro’s calculation with the results obtai ned from the preceding equa- tions. At the beginning of measurement, Shapiro estimated δt≃1.4×10−4−3.7×10−4sec for observations of Mercury near superior conjunction with r0≈4R⊙at 430 MHz frequency of the Arecibo Ionospheric Observatory. This difference in t ime delays between the general relativistic effect and the coronal plasma effect was nowhere large enough and positive for a really reliable result to be obtained solely from Arecibo da ta. He was thus tried to reduce the plasma effect by a factor of almost 400 by using measurements m ade at 8350 MHz frequency of Haystack radar of Lincoln Laboratory. For observation of Mercury with r0= 4R⊙at 430 MHz radiation, Eq. (36) gives δt≃1.8×10−4−12.6×10−4sec, and Eq. (37), in which the same model as used by Shapiro has been assumed, gives δt≃1.8×10−4−11.9×10−4sec. The values obtained for the plasma effect are about three time s larger than Shapiro’s estimate. This is because we have made a correction in the radial interv al of the path and integrate the resulting equation along the optical path bending near the S un, unlike Shapiro’s calculation along the optical path in straight line without any correcti ons. If we assume that the difference in path length is due solely to differing gravitational poten tial, the radial interval of integration must still be corrected by multiplication with n(r) even in the coronal plasma, not with n(r,ω) as used in (34). The excess time delays are then given by 1 .8×10−4−8.4×10−4sec and 1.8×10−4−7.9×10−4sec, respectively. The values so obtained for the plasma effe ct are just what we should expect if the excess time delays were calc ulated from the equation of rays without any correction on purely optical grounds. 6 Conclusion The discussion in this paper shows that the redshift effect is attributed not to the gravitational potential alone but to the pressure gradient including the g ravitational potential in the medium through which light propagates. Asymmetry observed in limb lines furnishes physical support for the effect of pressure on the redshift of solar spectral li nes. It has shown that the equation of rays of geometrical optics can also predict the correct va lues for the deflection of light and the radar echo delay by the Sun. Furthermore, agreement in st ructure between the equations of rays of geometrical optics and the geodesic equations of gen eral relativity suggests introducing an optical metric of n2(r) consisting of the gravitational potential, the mechanica l pressure, the magnetic pressure, and viscous effects in the medium of pr opagation. These results are obtained without direct calculations only by comparing the equations of rays with the geodesic equations formulated by Weinberg. In the light of this fact, Weinberg’s formalism has opened a door to establish new relationships between general relati vity and geometrical optics. Indeed, it was the formal similarity between (12) and (15) that enabl ed the present approach to be proposed. References [1] A. Einstein, Ann. der Phys. 35, 898 (1911). [2] L. F. Jewell, J. de Phys. 6, 84 (1897); Ch. Fabry and H. Boisson, Comptes Rendus 148, 688 (1909). [3] A. Einstein, Ann. der Phys. 49, 769 (1916). [4] H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, 1950), p. 135. 12[5] M. G. Adams, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 119, 460 (1959); L. A. Higgs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 121, 31 (1960). [6] H. E. White, Introduction to Atomic Spectra (McGraw-Hill, 1934), p. 431. [7] J. E. Blamont and F. Roddier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 437 (1961). [8] R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 439 (1959); Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 337 (1960); T. E. Cranshaw, J. P. Schiffer, and A. B. Whitehead ,Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 163 (1960). [9] H. J. Hay, J. P. Schiffer, T. E. Cranshaw, and P. A. Egelstaff ,Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 165 (1960). [10] D. O. Muhleman, R. D. Ekers, and E. B. Fomalont, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 1377 (1970). [11] G. A. Seielstad, R. A. Sramek, and K. W. Weiler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 1373 (1970). [12] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (John Wiley & Sons, 1972), Chap. 8. [13] M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon, 1975), 5th ed., p. 123. [14] L. I. Schiff, Am. J. Phys. 28, 340 (1960); C. Moller, The Theory of Relativity (Oxford, 1972), 2nd ed., p. 500. [15] I. I. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 789 (1964). [16] I. I. Shapiro, G. H. Pettengill, M. E. Ash, M. L. Stone, W. B. Smith, R. P. Ingalls, and R. A. Brockelman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1265 (1968); I. I. Shapiro, M. E. Ash, R. P. Ingalls, W. B. Smith, D. B. Campbell, R. B. Dyce, R. F. Jurgens, and G. H. Pettengill, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 1132 (1971). [17] C. W. Allen, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 107, 426 (1947). [18] W. C. Erickson, Astrophys. J. 139, 1290 (1964). [19] R. N. Bracewell, V. R. Eshelman, and J. V. Hollweg, Astrophys. J. 155, 367 (1969). [20] G. M. Clemence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 19, 361 (1947). 13The author should like to express his gratitude to a reviewer for corrections, criticism, and language corrections of the early draft of this paper. The au thor guesses the reviewer to be Prof. M. D. Kruskal. The reviewer’s comments on the redshift result are so instructive that the author would like to accompany herewith: Comments : [1] The redshift equation, Eq. 1 should hold for any acceler ation. If derivable from a potential one could postulate that gh/cbe replaced by the right member of Eq. 5 and then define n(r) by Eq. 8. This would avoid the potential confusion of fluid dr ag effects, as in Fizeau’s experiments, and also divorce the proposed effect f rom fluid flow per se . As the effects all stem from relative accelerations of reference frames, a clear description of what constitutes proper frames within and outside a “fluid” is needed. [2] I do not think that it is always possible to attribute the r edshift to a relative velocity between an inertial frame and a frame moving with a fluid. It ma y be possible that a relative acceleration between frames causes a local redshift and a cu mulative time delay. I think that an appeal to the principle of equivalence is still necessary in order to include all causes of acceleration as causes of redshift. [3] Without doing all of the manipulations required for proo f, I suspect that one could retrieve the redshift implied by Eq. 5 from the field equation s of general relativity. The terms beyond gravitational potential should be contained within the stress-energy tensor of the right member of the field equations. This is no criticism of Eq. 5; in fact it is good to have an intuitive way of arriving at the redshift result. [4] The author describes Einstein’s interpretation of reds hift as a manifestation of time dilation in a gravitational potential as “rather unusual”. I believe that this is unwarranted. At this point in the development of the author’s optical analog y he has tied everything to changes caused by properties of the “medium” of propagation. Since t here are effects clearly due to a gravitational field in the absence of any other “medium”, and other interpretations are lacking at this point, I believe that it is incorrect to call Einstein ’s interpretation “rather unusual”. Reply : I learn much from his comments. But I cannot agree to the poin t [4]. It reveals a difference of standpoint looking at the relativity theory be tween the current paradigm (reviewer) and the opponent (author). What the experiment has actually demonstrated is a change in wavelength or frequency with gravitational potential, not a change in rate of clock with it. One can see from the original paper that Einstein presented the i nterpretation of the redshift effect as a result of fitting the predicted speed of light c′=c(1 +gh/c2) even deliberately into the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light. I think that Einstein put the cart before the horse in its interpretation, apart from the controversy of w hether the postulate is consistent or inconsistent. 7 Appendix: Review of Planetary Motion According to the general theory of relativity, the elliptic al orbit of a planet rotates in its own plane in the same direction as the planet moves. For the motio n of Mercury in which the effect can be detected most easily, the theory predicts an advance o f the perihelion of angle 43 .03′′ per century. This value is in excellent agreement with 42 .56±0.94′′that is left after subtraction of all other known effects from the total observed motion [20] . Einstein’s announcement of the general theory of relativity in its definitive form was immed iately hailed by some astronomers as explaining a previously unaccountable discrepancy betw een the observed and theoretical mo- tions of this planet, although some astronomers were, howev er, intuitively opposed to relativity. It must be by far the most important experimental verificatio n of general relativity, both by means of the formal clarity brought to the theory by a space-t ime geometrization and by virtue of its high accuracy. 14In this appendix, we wish to review the equation of the orbit i n terms of the energy and angular momentum. The planet’s path is not an ellipse but an e xceedingly complicated space- curve due to the disturbing effects of all of the other planets . The equation of the orbit may therefore be meaningless, but we can still talk in terms of th e system energy and the system angular momentum. For many applications, the equation of mo tion containing the energy and angular momentum is the natural one. In order to discuss the c omparison with Newton’s theory or the transition to quantum theory, it is important that the description of the motion be in terms of its energy and angular momentum. Let us see what can be learned from Einstein’s theory, using o nly the equations of motion in the Schwarzschild metric field, before deriving the orbit equation. We begin by pointing out that the path length of a particle in a static isotropic gravi tational field is ds2=gµνdxmudxnu. The square of velocities is then given by c2→g00c2, v2→grr/parenleftbiggdr dt/parenrightbigg2 +r2/parenleftbiggdθ dt/parenrightbigg2 . (38) In consequence of this relation the Schwarzschild metric in (10) can be written dτ=g1/2 00dt/parenleftbigg 1−v2 c2/parenrightbigg1/2 , (39) to a first approximation. This form of equation reduces to the familiar equation leading to the Lorentz time dilation in the limit as g00approaches to unity. In this sense one may say the relation in (A.2) as the Schwarzschild time dilation. The equations of motion in the Schwarzschild field yield two c onstants of motion. One of them is given by g00dt dτ= constant, (40) which corresponds to the energy of the system. The other cons tant is obtained from r2(dθ/dτ ) = constant, and is absorbed immediately into the definition of the angular momentum. It would seem at first sight that the constant in (A.3) is of no importan ce, for clearly any constant of integration can be added to the right of (A.3) without affecti ng the validity of the equation. However, it is evident that the constant has an important phy sical significance, for it can bring the formulation of the resulting relativistic mechanics in terms of the energy of a particle as in the case of Hamiltonian in Newtonian mechanics. The relativ istic equations of motion must be such that in the nonrelativistic limit they go over into the c ustomary forms given by Newton’s theory. Thus the task of identifying the constant is greatly facilitated by seeking the form which it would have in the nonrelativistic limit. In the nonr elativistic limit, Eq. (A.3) can be expanded as g00dt dτ≃1 mc2/parenleftbigg mc2+1 2mv2−GMm r/parenrightbigg , (41) wheremis the mass of a particle. By comparison with Newton’s theory , we can identify the constant with g00dt dτ=1 mc2/parenleftbig mc2+E/parenrightbig . (42) Consequently it yields the expression E=mc2g00dt dτ−mc2(43) 15for the energy of a particle of mass mand velocity vin the static isotropic gravitational field. From (A.1), the momentum is defined by pr=mg1/2 rrdr dτandpθ=mrdθ dτ=l r. (44) Equations (A.6) and (A.7) are the necessary relativistic ge neralizations for the energy and momentum of a particle, consistent with the conservation la ws and the postulates of general relativity. As in the special theory of relativity, it is natural to attem pt to identify the four equations of energy and momentum conservation as relations among the e nergy-momentum four-vectors. We observe that the momentum in (A.7) is proportional to the s patial components of the four-velocity defined as√gµµdxµ/dτin (A.1). The time component of this four-velocity is√g00cdt/dτ . Comparison with (A.6) shows that the energy of a particle di ffers from its time component by the rest energy mc2. We are thus led to E=mc2g00dt dτ(45) as the covariant form of the total energy, for then the moment umpandE/c√g00form an energy-momentum four-vector. Formally the connection bet ween the energy Eand the momen- tum is expressed in the Schwarzschild metric in (10) or in the statement that the magnitude of the momentum four-vector is constant: E2 c2g00−/parenleftbig p2 r+p2 θ/parenrightbig =m2c2. (46) Equation (A.9) is an extension of the relation T2/c2−p2=m2c2in special relativity that meets the requirements of general relativity. Note that the gravitational potential lends itself to incor poration in the metric of space- time geometrization, so the potential energy is absorbed au tomatically into the path length of a particle and its motion therein. In general relativity, th erefore, such energies as kinetic energy and potential energy become meaningless any more; only one e nergy of a particle is needed to solve the equations of motion in their most general forms. Having formulated the relativistic expression for energy, we can now review the relativity effect in the equation of the orbit of planet in terms of the ene rgy and angular momentum of the system. For comparison with Newton’s theory, it is prefe rable to define the energy Eas in (A.6), which would bring Ein line with the nonrelativistic value. The Schwarzschild m etric in (10) can now be expressed in terms of two constants of motion Eandlas (mc2+E)2 c2g00−m2grr/parenleftbiggdr dτ/parenrightbigg2 −l2 r2=m2c2. (47) This equation can also be obtained from a combination of the d ifferential equations resulting from the geodesic equations. But most often we are more inter ested in the shape of orbits, that is, inras a function of θ, than in their time history. The angular momentum relation c an then be used directly to convert (A.10) into the differential equa tion for the orbit; this gives (mc2+E)2 c2l2g00−grr r4/parenleftbiggdr dθ/parenrightbigg2 −l r2=m2c2 l2. (48) The solution may thus be determined by a quadrature: △θ=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg(mc2+E)2 c2l2g00−m2c2 l2−1 r2/bracketrightbigg−1/2g1/2 rrdr r2. (49) 16At perihelia and aphelia, rreaches its minimum and maximum values r−andr+, and at both points dr/dθ vanishes, so (A.11) gives (mc2+E)2 c2l2g00(r±)−l r2 ±=m2c2 l2, (50) whereg00(r±) = 1−2GM/c2r±. From these two equations we can derive values for the two constants of the motion: /parenleftbigg 1 +E mc2/parenrightbigg2 =r2 +−r2 − r2 +g−1 00(r+)−r2 −g−1 00(r−),m2c2 l2=r−2 +g00(r+)−r−2 −g00(r−) g00(r−)−g00(r+).(51) The expressions for the energy and angular momentum appear h ere in somewhat different forms involving the metric tensors g00(r±), but their equivalence in the limit as g00→1 with the respective nonrelativistic Newtonian relations are sh own by expanding the equations to a first approximation as E≃ −GMm r++r−, l2≃2GMm2 r−1 ++r−1 −. (52) Using the exact values of the constants given by (A.14) in (A. 12) yield the formula for △θas △θ=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbiggr−2 +(g−1 00(r)−g−1 00(r−))−r−2 −(g−1 00(r)−g−1 00(r+)) g−1 00(r+)−g−1 00(r−)−1 r2/bracketrightbigg−1/2g1/2 rr(r)dr r2. (53) We can make the argument of the first square root in the integra nd a quadratic function of 1 /r which vanishes at r=r±, so △θ≃/integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg C/parenleftbigg1 r−−1 r/parenrightbigg/parenleftbigg1 r−1 r+/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg−1/2/parenleftbigg 1 +GM c2r/parenrightbiggdr r2, (54) whereC≃1−(2GM/c2)(1/r++1/r−). The constant Ccould be determined by letting r→ ∞. We can obtain the same result more simply if we use the expansi on inGM/c2rin the formal solution of the equation of motion given by (A.12). The proce ss of arriving at the orbit equation is particularly simple here. The angle swept out by the posit ion vector is then given by (A.12) as △θ≃/integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg2mE l2/parenleftbigg 1+E 2mc2/parenrightbigg +2GMm2 l2r/parenleftbigg 1+2E mc2/parenrightbigg −1 r2/parenleftbigg 1−4G2M2m2 c2l2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg−1/2/parenleftbigg 1+GM c2r/parenrightbiggdr r2. (55) As it stands, this indefinite integral is of the standard form . The integrand differs from the corresponding nonrelativistic expression in that the seco nd term in each parenthesis represents the relativistic correction. Equation (A.18) is the genera l-relativity analogue of Sommerfeld’s treatment of the hydrogen atom in special relativity. On carrying out the integration, the equation of the orbit is found to be 1 r≃A/bracketleftbigg 1 +ǫcos/parenleftbigg (θ−θ0)/parenleftbigg 1−3G2M2m2 c2l2/parenrightbigg −GM c2r2/parenleftbiggdr dθ/parenrightbigg/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg , (56) where A≃GMm2 l2/parenleftbigg 1 +2E mc2+4G2M2m2 c2l2/parenrightbigg , ǫ ≃/bracketleftbigg 1 +2El2 G2M2m3/parenleftbigg 1−7E 2mc2−4G2M2m2 c2l2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg1/2 , (57) 17andθ0is a constant of integration. In addition to the motion of the perihelion of a planet, the relativity effect produces the term ( GM/c2r2)(dr/dθ ) in the angle swept out by the radius vector of the planet. This term is not a new result but merely a result of rewriting the square root in the integrand which the integration of (A.17) or (A.1 8) actually yields, using (A.12) to a first approximation. It is evident therefore that the rel ativity effect in planetary motion obeying (A.17) or (A.18), is to cause not only the precession of the perihelion of the orbit of a planet but also the change in the angular displacement of the planet due to its radial velocity. The additional change appearing in the angular displacemen t of the planet, which does not appear in a circular orbit, might be an effect due to the finite v elocity of propagation of the solar gravitational field. In order to calculate △θto first order in GM/c2r, we needg00to second order in GM/c2r. To say it in another way, the current discussion of the planet ary orbit precession serves as a touchstone for the possible forms of metric tensor by requir ing the degree of agreement to second order. Equations (A.17) and (A.18) are obtained by setting g00(r) = 1−2GM/c2r. But the optical approach discussed in the previous sections gives a metric tensor that can be expressed asg00(r) = (1−GM/c2r)2, when only the gravitational potential is taken into consid eration. Unless the optical approach is incorrect, we can gain furthe r insight into the metric tensor by assuming that the usual rules for the motion of particles a nd light rays in a given metric fieldgµνstill apply, but that the metric for the motion of particles m ay be different from that for light rays. While the metric for the motion of particles i s determined by comparing the geodesic equations with Newton’s equation of motion of a par ticle, indeed, the metric for light rays is determined in this paper by comparing the geodesic eq uations with the hydrodynamic equation describing the state of motion of the medium of prop agation. In the optical approach, it has shown that the metric tensor grris identified with the square of a refractive index of the medium with spherical symmetry. However, it is true that suc h an interpretation of the metric tensorgrrcannot be applied identically to the equation of motion of ma terial particles. 18

arXiv:physics/0006007v1 [physics.acc-ph] 5 Jun 20001 Polarized Protons in HERA G. H. Hoffstaetter∗a aDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, FRG Polarized proton beams at HERA can currently only be produce d by extracting a beam from a polarized source and then accelerating it in the three synchrotrons at DESY. In this paper, the processes which can depolarize a proton beam in circular accelerators are explained, devices which could avoid this depolarizati on in the DESY accelerator chain are described, and specific problems which become impo rtant at the high energies of HERA are mentioned. At HERA’s high energies, spin motion c annot be accurately described with the isolated resonance model which has been s uccessfully used for lower energy rings. To illustrate the principles of more accurate simulations, the invariant spin field is introduced to describe the equilibrium polariz ation state of a beam and the changes during acceleration. It will be shown how linearize d spin motion leads to a computationally quick approximation for the invariant spi n field and how to amend this with more time consuming but accurate non-perturbative com putations. Analysis with these techniques has allowed us to establish optimal Siberi an Snake schemes for HERA. 1. INTRODUCTION In contrast to polarized high energy electron beams which ca n become polarized by the emission of spin flip synchrotron radiation, proton beam s do not become polarized after acceleration. High energy polarized protons can only be produced by accelerating a beam from a polarized ion source. The highest energy reache d so far was 25GeV in the AGS and a lot of care had to be taken during acceleration to preserve this injected polarization [1,3]. To explain depolarization in circular accelerators, some concepts from spin dynamics have to be introduced. When a particle with cha rgeqmoves through a magnetic field, the motion of the classical spin vector in the instantaneous rest frame is described by the Lorentz force equation and the Thomas-BMT e quation [4,5], d/vector p dt=−q mγ{/vectorB⊥} ×/vector p ,d/vector s dt=−q mγ{(Gγ+ 1)/vectorB⊥+ (G+ 1)/vectorB/bardbl} ×/vector s , (1) where/vectorB⊥and/vectorB⊥are the magnetic field components perpendicular and paralle l to the particle’s momentum /vector p. At high energy where ( Gγ+ 1)/γ≈G, the spin motion is independent of energy and a fixed field integral of 5 .48Tm leads to a spin rotation of 180◦, in contrast to the orbit deflection which varies with 1 /γ. For fixed orbit deflections and thus fixed ratio of /vectorB⊥/γ, the spin precession rate increases with energy as we now describe. ∗Invited talk at the NUCLEON99, INFN, Frascati 19992 In purely transverse magnetic fields, the Thomas-BMT equati on has the same structure as the Lorentz force equation up to a factor Gγ+ 1 . The spin therefore rotates like the momentum but with a magnified rate. At the HERA energy of 920Ge V, the magnification factor isGγ= 1756 so that the spin is rotated by 100◦when a proton’s direction is altered by 1mrad in a transverse magnetic field and the spin ro tates 1756 times around the vertical while a particle makes one turn on the design orbit o f a flat circular accelerator, where the fields are vertical. The number of spin rotations wh ich a particle performs while it travels along the closed orbit once is called the spin tune ν0. When the spin tune is integer, the spin comes back to a field imp erfection with the same direction after one turn and the effect of the field error can ad d up coherently from turn to turn. This resonant depolarization at integer spin tunes ν0is called an imperfection resonance [6]. When viewed at a fixed azimuth θof the accelerator, the particles appear to perform harmonic oscillations around the closed orbit with the freq uenciesνx,νy, andντfor horizontal, vertical, and longitudinal motion. These are c alled the orbital tunes. Some of the fields through which a particle propagates will theref ore oscillate with the orbital tunes. Whenever the non-integer part of the spin tune is equa l to plus or minus one of these frequencies, the resulting coherent perturbation ca n lead to depolarization. The coherent depolarization at the first order resonance condit ionν0=m+νkis called an intrinsic resonance [6]. Here the notation ν1=νx,ν2=-νx,ν3=νy,ν4=-νy,ν5=ντ,ν6=-ντ is used. Since the spin tune changes with energy (in a flat ring ν0=Gγ) resonances will have to be crossed at some energies during acceleration. After one turn around the accelerator, all spins of particle s on the closed orbit have been rotated by 2 πν0around a unit rotation vector /vector n0. This vector is determined by the accelerator’s main guide fields and small field imperfect ions only perturb /vector n0weakly except at energies where the guide fields would produce an int eger spin tune. Then, when viewed from a fixed azimuth, spins would come back after one tu rn apparently without a rotation. Close to imperfection resonances the remaining rotation and therefore the direction of /vector n0will be dominated by the influence of field errors. While the en ergy changes during acceleration, /vector n0changes its direction strongly at these resonances. Whenev er this change is sufficiently slow, spins which are initially parall el to/vector n0will follow the change of /vector n0adiabatically. Imperfection resonances can therefore be c rossed either by making the field imperfections small enough or by making them so strong t hat/vector n0already starts to get influenced by the field errors sufficiently long before the r esonance and then changes slowly enough to let all spins follow adiabatically while th e resonance is crossed. Special magnets for enhancing this effect without disturbing the orb it are referred to as partial snakes. So far solenoid magnets have been used [7] but for the AGS a helical dipole partial snake is under construction [3]. The motion of spins along phase space trajectories is domina ted by the main guide fields on the closed orbit except close to an intrinsic resonance, w here the coherent perturbations described above can dominate over the main guide fields. When the emittance of the beam and therefore the amplitude of the perturbations is sufficien tly small, intrinsic resonances can be crossed without loss of polarization. Polarization i n the core of the beam will therefore be only weakly influenced when crossing intrinsic resonances. If a strong coherent perturbation is slowly switched on and off, an effect similar t o adiabatically following /vector n03 occurs and polarization is conserved. Therefore, while an i ntrinsic resonance is crossed, perturbations influencing particles in the tails of a beam wi ll slowly increase already before the resonance and this adiabatic conservation of polarizat ion can occur. In intermediate parts of the beam, however, the polarization is lost. This ty pe of depolarization can be overcome by slowly exciting the whole beam coherently at a fr equency close to the orbital tune which causes the perturbation. All spins then follow th e adiabatic change of the polarization direction and the resonance can be crossed wit h little loss of polarization. The excitation amplitude is then reduced slowly so that the b eam emittance does not change noticeably during the whole process. This mechanism has recently been tested successfully at the AGS [1]. An older technique of avoiding d epolarization at strong intrinsic resonances utilizes pulsed quadrupoles to move t he orbital tune within a few microseconds just before a resonance so that the resonance i s crossed so quickly that the spin motion is hardly disturbed [8]. So far no polarized beam has been accelerated to more than 25G eV [3]. But the pos- sibility of polarized proton acceleration has been analyze d for RHIC (250GeV), for the TEVATRON (900GeV), and for HERA (920GeV). When acceleratin g through approx- imately 5000 resonances in the case of HERA, even very small d epolarization in every resonance crossing would add up to a detrimental effect. It was mentioned below equation (1) that in a fixed transverse magnetic field the deflec- tion angle of high energy particles depends on energy, where as the spin rotation does not depend on energy. It is therefore possible to devise a fixed fie ld magnetic device which ro- tates spins by πwhenever a high energy particle travels through it at the diff erent energies of an acceleration cycle. Such field arrangements which rota te spins byπwhile perturbing the orbit only moderately are called Siberian Snakes [9]. Th e rotation axis is called the snake axis and the angle of this axis to the beam direction is r eferred to as the snake angle ψ. Let us consider a Siberian Snake with snake angle ψ1at one point in a flat ring and a second Siberian Snake with snake angle ψ2at the opposite side of the ring where the spin has rotated by Gγ/2. The spin rotation around the vertical between the Siberia n Snakes is described with Pauli matrices by the quaternion co s(πGγ/2) +isin(πGγ/2)σ2. The rotation by the first Siberian Snake is described by i[sin(ψ1)σ1+ cos(ψ1)σ3] . The total rotation for one turn around the ring is then described by i[sin(ψ1)σ1+ cos(ψ1)σ3]·[cos(πGγ/2) +isin(πGγ/2)σ2] ·i[sin(ψ2)σ1+ cos(ψ2)σ3]·[cos(πGγ/2) +isin(πGγ/2)σ2] =i[sin(ψ1+πGγ/2)σ1+ cos(ψ1+πGγ/2)σ3] ·i[sin(ψ2+πGγ/2)σ1+ cos(ψ2+πGγ/2)σ3] =−cos(ψ1−ψ2) +isin(ψ1−ψ2)σ2. (2) Forψ1−ψ2=π/2 the spins rotate in total 1 /2 times around the vertical /vector n0during a complete turn around the ring, giving ν0= 1/2. All imperfection resonances and, since the orbital tunes cannot be 1 /2, also all first order intrinsic resonances are avoided by the insertion of these two Siberian Snakes, and polarized beam acceleration to very high energy could become possible. Siberian Snakes can only be used at sufficiently high energies since their fields are not changed during accel eration of the beam and they produce orbit distortions which are too big for energies bel ow approximately 8GeV [10].4 2. THE DESY ACCELERATOR CHAIN FOR POLARIZED PROTONS For HERA a polarized proton beam would be produced by a polari zed H−source. Then it would be accelerated to 750keV in an RFQ and then to 50MeV in the LINAC III from where it would be accelerated in the synchrotron DESY III to 7 .5GeV/c. In the next ring, PETRA, 40GeV/c are reached, and HERA finally accelerat es to 920GeV/c. The four main challenges for obtaining highly polarized beams i n HERA are: (1) Production of a 20mA pulsed H−beam. (2) Polarimetry at various stages in the acceleration chain. (3)Acceleration through the complete accelerator chain with little depolar ization. (4) Storage of a polarized beam at the top energy over many hours with litt le depolarization. Polarized protons are produced either by a polarized atomic beam source (ABS), where a pulsed beam with 87% polarization for 1mA beam current has b een achieved, or by an optically pumped polarized ion source (OPPIS), where pulse d beams with 60% for 5mA have been achieved. Experts claim that 80% polarization and 20mA could be achievable with the second type of source. The current source at DESY pro duces 60mA but the maximal current of 205mA in DESY III can already be achieved w ith a 20mA source. Polarimeters will have to be installed at several crucial pl aces in the accelerator chain. The source would contain a Lyman- αpolarimeter [11]. Another polarimeter could be installed after the RFQ [12]. This could not be operated cont inuously since it disturbs the beam. The transfer of polarized particles through the LI NAC III could be optimized with a polarimeter similar to that in the AGS LINAC; and like t he AGS, DESY III could contain an internal polarimeter [8]. Polarization at DESY I II energies has been achieved and measured at several labs already. It is different with PET RA and HERA energies; for these high energies there is no established polarimeter . Here one has to wait and see how the novel techniques envisaged and developed for RHIC wi ll work [13]. Since DESY III has a super period of eight, only 4 strong intri nsic first order resonances have to be crossed. They are at values for the spin tune Gγof 8−νy, 0+νy, 16−νy, and 8 +νy. Depolarization can be avoided by jumping the tune with puls ed quadrupoles in a few microseconds or by excitation of a resonance with an RF di pole. A solenoid partial snake would be used to cross the one strong imperfection reso nance atGγ= 8. All these methods have been tested successfully at the AGS and it is lik ely that a highly polarized proton beam could be extracted from the DESY III synchrotron at 7.5GeV/c . In PETRA it would be very cumbersome to cross all resonances w hich can be seen in figure 1 (middle). Since Siberian Snakes can be constructe d for the injection energy of PETRA [14] it will be best to avoid all first order resonance s with two such devices. There is space for Siberian Snakes in the east and the west sec tion of PETRA. 3. SPECIFIC PROBLEMS FOR THE HERA RING HERA is a very complex accelerator and a brief look already in dicates four reasons why producing a polarized beam in HERA is more difficult than in an i deal ring. (1) HERA has a super periodicity of one and only an approximate mirror sym metry between the North and South halves of the ring. Therefore more resonances appe ar than in a ring with some higher super periodicity and special schemes for canceling resonances in symmetric lattices [15] cannot be used in such a ring. (2) The proton ring of HERA i s on top of the electron ring in the arcs, and the proton beam is bent down to the level o f the electron ring on5 both sides of the three experiments H1, HERMES, and ZEUS in th e North, East, and South straight sections. The HERA proton accelerator is the refore not a flat ring. The destructive effect of the vertical bends can, however, be eli minated by so called flattening snakes [16,17] which let the spin motion in pairs of vertical bends cancel and makes /vector n0vertical outside the non-flat sections of HERA. (3) There is s pace for spin rotators which make the polarization parallel to the beam direction i nside the collider experiments while keeping it vertical in the arcs, and there is also space for four Siberian Snakes. But installing more than four Siberian Snakes would involve a lot of costly construction work. Simulations have shown that 8 snakes with properly cho sen snake angles would be desirable. However, if one does not choose optimal snake ang les, then four-snake-schemes can be better than eight snake schemes [18]. (4) The energy is very high and therefore the spin rotates rapidly. If HERA had been designed for polar ized proton acceleration, several parts of the ring would probably have been construct ed differently. 4. APPLICABLE THEORY AND SIMULATION TOOLS 4.1. The isolated resonance model In the isolated resonance model, the field components which p erturb the spin of a particle that oscillates around the closed orbit are Fourie r expanded. The perturbation of spin motion is then approximated by dropping all except one o f the Fourier components. When/vector zdescribes the phase space coordinates relative to the close d orbit and θdescribes the accelerator’s azimuth, the Thomas-BMT equation (1) has the formd/vector s/dθ =/vectorΩ(/vector z,θ)×/vector s. The precession vector /vectorΩ can be written as /vectorΩ0(θ) +/vector ω(/vector z,θ) with a part on the closed orbit and a part which is linear in the phase space coordinate s/vector z. For spins parallel to the rotation vector on the closed orbit /vector n0(θ) only the components of /vector ω(/vector z,θ) which are perpendicular to /vector n0perturb the polarization. We now choose two mutually orthog onal unit vectors /vector m0and/vectorl0which are perpendicular to /vector n0and precess around /vectorΩ0according to the Thomas-BMT equation on the closed orbit. The frequency o f their rotation is given by the spin tune ν0. In this model a depolarizing resonance occures when a Fourie r component of /vector ω(/vector z(θ),θ) rotates with the same frequency as /vector m0and/vectorl0so that there is a coherent perturbation of the spins away from /vector n0. The Fourier component ǫν0for this frequency is obtained from the Fourier integral along a trajectory /vector z(θ), ǫν0= lim N→∞1 2πN/integraldisplay2πN 0/vector ω(/vector z(θ),θ)·(/vector m0+i/vectorl0)dθ . (3) These resonance strengths are shown in the figure 1 (top), (mi ddle), and (bottom) for the three proton synchrotrons at DESY. They were all computed fo r an oscillation amplitude of/vector z(θ) corresponding to the one sigma vertical emittance of 4 πmm mrad. 4.2. The invariant spin field Already at extraction from PETRA the polarized beam would ha ve somewhat more energy than any other polarized proton beam so far obtained a nd one has to ask whether the isolated resonance model successfully used so far for de scribing depolarization is still applicable. To understand whether the isolated resonance m odel describes spin motion at HERA accurately, we introduce the invariant spin field of a circular accelerator. It has6 been mentioned that a particle on the closed orbit has to be po larized parallel to /vector n0in order to have the same polarization after every turn. Simila rly, one can ask if the whole field of spin directions for particles at different phase spac e points can be invariant from turn to turn. Each particle can have a different spin direction at its phase space point /vector zand each of these spins propagates with a different precession vector /vectorΩ(/vector z(θ),θ) in the Thomas- BMT equation. A spin field /vector n(/vector z) which is invariant after one turn around the ring is called an invariant spin field or a Derbenev–Kontratenko /vector n-axis [9]. A beam which is polarized parallel to this invariant spin field at every phas e space point does not change its polarization state from turn to turn. Particles change t heir location in phase space from some initial phase space coordinate /vector ziin the Poincar´ e section at azimuth θto some final coordinate after one turn /vector zf=/vectorM(/vector zi) according to the one turn map. And spins change their directions according to the one turn spin trans port matrix R(/vector zi), but the invariant field of spin directions /vector n(/vector zi) does not change after one turn. This requirement is encompassed by the periodicity condition /vector n(/vectorM(/vector zi)) =R(/vector zi)/vector n(/vector zi). (4) Note that the polarization state of a particle beam is in gene ral not invariant from turn to turn when all particles are initially completely polarized parallel to each other, but rather when each particle is polarized parallel to /vector n(/vector z) at its phase space point /vector z. In this case the polarization of a particle will be parallel to /vector n(/vector zi) whenever it comes close to its initial phase space point /vector ziduring later turns around the ring, as long as /vector n(/vector z) is sufficiently continuous. When two particles travel along the same trajec tory, the angle between their two spins does not change. When a particle is initially polar ized with an angle φto/vector n(/vector z), it will therefore be rotated around /vector n(/vector z) every time it comes close to /vector zi, but it will still have the angleφto the invariant spin field. The time averaged polarization a t/vector ziwill therefore be parallel to /vector n(/vector zi), but it can only have the magnitude 1 if the spin was initiall y parallel to the invariant spin field. However, even if all particles ar e initially polarized parallel to /vector n(/vector z), the beam polarization is not 1 but </vector n> where<...> denotes an average over the beam. The maximum average polarization that can be stored in an accelerator at a given fixed energy is therefore |< /vector n > |. It was first pointed out in [19] that this maximum polarization can be small in HERA. Since the spin dynamics depends on energy, the invariant spi n field/vector n(/vector z) will change during the acceleration process. If this change is slow enou gh, spins which are parallel to/vector n(/vector z) will follow adiabatically. However, if the change is too ra pid, polarization will be lost. It is therefore good to have < /vector n > close to 1 not only at the collider energy but during the complete acceleration cycle. Four problems occu r when the different directions of/vector n(/vector z) are not close to parallel for all particles in the beam. (1) S udden changes of /vector n(/vector z) reduces the polarization. (2) The average polarization ava ilable to the collider experiment is reduced. (3) The polarization involved in each collision process depends on the phase space position of the interacting particles. (4) Measuring the polarization in the tail of the beam will not give accurate information on the average po larization of the beam.7 4.2.1. Linearized spin orbit motion At azimuth θ, a spin can be described by a usually small complex coordinat eαwith /vector s=ℜ{α}/vector m0(θ)+ℑ{α}/vectorl0(θ)+/radicalBig 1− |α|2/vector n0(θ). When the spin coordinates αand the phase space coordinates are linearized, one approximates an init ial spin by /vector si≈ ℜ{αi}/vector m0(0) + ℑ{αi}/vectorl0(0) +/vector n0(0) at azimuth 0 and the final spin after one turn around the acc elerator by/vector sf=ℜ{αf}/vector m0(0) + ℑ{αf}/vectorl0(0) +/vector n0(0) whereαfis determined by the 7 ×7 one turn transport matrix M77, /parenleftBigg/vector zf αf/parenrightBigg =M77/parenleftBigg/vector zi αi/parenrightBigg =/parenleftBiggM/vector0 /vectorGTei2πν0/parenrightBigg/parenleftBigg/vector zi αi/parenrightBigg , (5) wherebyMis the 6 ×6 dimensional one turn transport matrix for the phase space v ariables, the exponential describes the rotation of the spin componen tsαby the spin tune ν0around /vector n0, the row vector /vectorGTdescribes the dependence of spin motion on phase space motio n to first order, and the 6 dimensional zero vector /vector0 shows that the effect of Stern Gerlach forces on the orbit motion is not considered. We now write the components perpendicular to /vector n0of the invariant spin field as a com- plex function nα(/vector z) and use a 7 dimensional vector /vector n1to obtain the first order expansion of/vector n(/vector z). The linearized periodicity condition for the invariant s pin field is /vector n1(/vector z) =/parenleftBigg/vector z nα(/vector z)/parenrightBigg , /vector n1(M/vector z) =M77/vector n1(/vector z). (6) This equation can be solved for /vector n1after the matrices are diagonalized. Let A−1be the column matrix of eigenvectors of the one turn matrix M. The diagonalized matrix of orbit motion Λ =AMA−1has the diagonal elements exp( i2πνk) given by the orbital tunesν1=νx,ν2=−νx, etc. We now need the 7 ×6 dimensional matrix Twhich is the column matrix of the first 6 eigenvectors of M77and has the form T=/parenleftBiggA−1 /vectorBT/parenrightBigg , TΛ=M77T, (7) where the 7th components of the eigenvectors form a vector /vectorB. If a linear function /vector n1(/vector z) = K/vector zof the phase space coordinates can be found, which satisfies t he periodicity condition (6), then an invariant spin field has been determined. Insert ing the form /vector z1=K/vector zinto equation (6) and multiplying the resulting condition KM=M77KbyA−1from the right leads to KA−1Λ=M77KA−1. Therefore KA−1is the 7 ×6 dimensional matrix of eigenvectors Tsatisfying equation (7) and we conclude that there exists a u nique linear invariant spin field given by /vector n1(/vector z) =TA/vector z . (8) In the linear approximation of spin motion, the invariant sp in field is simply computed via the eigenvectors of the 7 ×7 spin orbit transport matrix. This matrix M77can be computed in various ways, for example by multiplying the i ndividual spin transport matrixes of all elements [20] or by concatenating spin trans port quaternions of individual elements as done in the program SPRINT [21]. In the normal for m space belonging to8 the diagonal matrix Λ the coordinates are given by the actions Jjand the angle variables Φjwith A/vector z=/parenleftBigg√J1eiΦ1√J1e−iΦ1 .../parenrightBigg . (9) The average over all angle variables of a phase space torus th en leads to the average opening angle of <φ(/vector n,/vector n0)>≈atan(/radicalBig <|nα|2>) = atan(/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt3/summationdisplay k=1(|B2k−1|2+|B2k|2)Jk), (10) where theBkare the 7th components of the eigenvectors in equation (7). These opening angles are shown for DESY III in figure 2 (top) an d it is apparent that at the places where resonant spin perturbations are described by a large resonance strength, the invariant spin field has a large opening angle. It is obvio us when comparing with the resonance strength of figure 1 (top) that the influence of d ifferent resonances does not overlap in the linearized spin approximation. At PETRA e nergies of up to 40GeV, the resonances already come very close to each other as seen w hen comparing figure 2 (middle) with figure 1 (middle) and one can only barely expec t an isolated resonance approximation to lead to accurate results. For high energie s between 780 and 820GeV/c in HERA, figure 2 (bottom) clearly shows that one cannot speak of isolated resonances. Often the influences of 4 resonances overlap. The approximation of linearized spin motion contains all fir st order orbital frequencies, since it linearized the precession vector /vectorΩ with respect to /vector z. However, in contrast to the isolated resonance model, none of these resonances is ignor ed and the effect of overlapping resonances can be seen. It is possible to recover the first order isolated resonance s trength from the one turn spin orbit transport matrix. In analogy to the complex notat ion for the spin component perpendicular to /vector n0, the perturbing precession vector /vector ωis expressed by a complex function ω(/vector z,/vectorθ) as/vector ω=ℜ{ω}/vector m0+ℑ{ω}/vectorl0+ (/vector ω·/vector n0)/vector n0. Inserting this into the Thomas-BMT equation, one obtains α′=−i√ 1−/vector α2ω+iα(/vector ω·/vector n0). (11) In the case of spins which are nearly parallel to /vector n0, one can linearize in αand/vector z. For a spin which was initially parallel to /vector n0one obtains α(θ)≈ −i/integraltextθ 0ωdθ. Comparing with equation (3) one can express the resonance strength as ǫν0=ilimN→∞1 2πNα(2πN) . The resonance strength can therefore be computed from MN 77/Nfor largeN. The computation becomes very efficient if one uses M2N 77= (MN 77)2iteratively. The coordinate vectors /vector m0(2π) and/vectorl0(2π) to whichα(2π) refers have rotated by the spin tuneν0, whereas the final spin coordinate αfcomputed by M77refers to the coordinate vectors/vector m0(0) and/vectorl0(0). Therefore α(2πN) =αfexp(−i2πNν 0), andǫν0can be computed from powers of the one turn matrix, which can most efficiently b e evaluated in diagonal form, ǫν0=ilim N→∞1 2πNα(2πN) =ilim N→∞1 2πN(0,e−iN2πν0)/parenleftBiggM0 /vectorGTei2πν0/parenrightBiggN/parenleftBigg/vector z 0/parenrightBigg (12)9 =ilim N→∞e−iN2πν01 2πNN−1/summationdisplay j=0[ei(N−j−1)2πν0/vectorGTA−1Λj]A/vector z (13) =ie−i2πν0GlA−1 lkAkmzmlim N→∞1 2πNN−1/summationdisplay j=0ei2πj(νk−ν0)(14) where one has to sum over equal indices k,l, andm. This formula shows that the resonance strength is always zero, except at a resonance con ditionν0=m+νk. At such a spin tune, the resonance strength is given by 2π|ǫν0=νk|=|/vectorGTA−1diag(0...1...0)A/vector z|=|/vectorGTA−1(0.../radicalBig JkeiΦk...0)T|=|/vectorG·/vector vk|/radicalBig Jk.(15) The 1 in the diagonal matrix is in position k. HereA−1(0...√JkeiΦk...0)Tis the initial value for a phase space trajectory which has only Fourier com ponents with frequencies νk plus integers and the kth eigenvector /vector vkofMhas been used. The infinite Fourier integral in equation (3) has been reduced to the scalar product betwee n the bottom vector of M77 and an eigenvector of M. This very simple formula is used in the program SPRINT. 4.3. Non-perturbative methods While one does not drop Fourier coefficients in the approximat ion of linearized spin motion, there are other limitations. The approximation is n o longer justified when |nα| becomes large, which happens close to resonances in the figur es 2. Therefore the validity of linearized spin motion had to be be checked by computing th e invariant spin field non- perturbatively. In the last few years two iterative higher o rder and three non-perturbative methods of computing the invariant spin field have been devel oped [22]. All of these meth- ods agree within their ranges of mutual applicability. The i nvariant spin field obtained from a non-perturbative method contains the effect of all Fou rier coefficients in /vectorΩ. When comparing this spin field with /vector n1, it was found that linearized orbit motion describes the opening angle and thus the maximum storeable polarization w ell in domains where the opening angle is small. At the critical energies, where the m aximum polarization is low during the acceleration process, non-perturbative method s become essential for simulation and results obtained with the computationally quick linear ization of spin motion should always be checked with more time consuming non-perturbativ e methods if possible. One application of this strategy is the filtering method [23] . Four or eight Siberian Snakes are inserted into HERA to fix the spin tune to 1 /2 for all energies and to let /vector n0be vertical in the flat arcs. These conditions do not fix all snake angles. Currently there is, however, no established formula to determine good snake ang les. Since the opening angle of/vector n(/vector z) is such a critical quantity for high energy polarized proto n acceleration, we have decided to maximize </vector n> by choosing snake angles. A computer code was written which tested approximately 106snake schemes and computational speed was therefore essent ial. Linearized spin motion was used to find the 8-snake-schemes w ith smallest average value of|nα|over the acceleration cycle. These filtered snake schemes th en also had relatively small opening angles when computed non-perturbatively wit h stroboscopic averaging [21]. Two other indications showed that this filtering leads to goo d snake schemes. (1) Track- ing simulations of the complete ramp process showed that the snake schemes found by filtering leads to less depolarization [24] than other schem es which were initially proposed. (2) Computation of the amplitude dependent spin tune, which can only be performed when10 /vector n(/vector z) has been found non-perturbatively, shows that snakes sche mes found by filtering have significantly less spin tune spread over orbital amplitudes than other proposed schemes [25]. With the optimal scheme for four Siberian Snakes in HER A it turned out to be possible to accelerate in computer simulations approximat ely 65% of the beam to high energy with little loss of polarization as long as no closed o rbit distortions were present [18]. In simulations, the current 1mm rms closed orbit disto rtions lead to depolarization [26]. Therefore either the closed orbit will have to be contr olled more accurately or tech- niques which make the spin motion less sensitive to closed or bit distortion [27] will have to be utilized. Acknowledgment: I thank D.P.Barber for carefully reading the manuscript. REFERENCES 1. M. Bai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(21) (1998) 4673–4676. 2. D. P. Barber and A. De Roeck (eds.), Proceedings of the work shop on Polarized Protons at High Energies, Hamburg, 1999. 3. T. Roser, In [2] 4. L. H. Thomas, Phil. Mag. 3 (1927) 1 5. V. Bargmann, L. Michel, and V. L. Telegdi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2(10) (1959) 435–436. 6. E. D. Courant and R. D. Ruth, Brookhaven Report BNL–51270 ( 1980). 7. B.B. Blinov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 1621–1623. 8. F. Z. Khiari et al., Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 45–85. 9. Ya. S. Derbenev and A. M. Kondratenko, Sov. Phys. JETP 37(6 ) (1973) 968. 10. V. Anferov, In [2] 11. A. N. Zelenskii et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A(245) (19 86) 223–229. 12. L. Buchmann, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A(301) (1991) 383–3 88. 13. G. Bunce in [2], A. D. Krisch in [2] 14. SPIN Collaboration and the DESY Polarization Team, Repo rt UM-HE-96-20 (1996). 15. G. H. Hoffstaetter, In Reprot UM-HE-99-05 (1999). 16. K. Steffen, Report DESY-88-068 (1988). 17. V. A. Anferov and R. Phelps, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods A3 98(2-3) (1997) 423–425. 18. D. P. Barber, G. H. Hoffstaetter, and M. Vogt, In Report UM- HE-99-05 (1999). 19. D. P. Barber, Proceedings of the 1995 conference ”The Spi n Structure of the Nucleon” at Erice, World Scientific, 1998 20. A. W. Chao, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 180 (1981) 29. 21. K. Heinemann and G. H. Hoffstaetter, Phys. Rev. E 54 (1996) 4240–4255 22. G. H. Hoffstaetter, M. Vogt, and D. P. Barber, Report DESY- 97-161 and Phys. Rev. Sp. Top. - Acc. Beams (accepted 1999). 23. G. H. Hoffstaetter, Report DESY-HERA-96-05 (1996), and G . H. Hoffstaetter, In [2] 24. D. P. Barber, M. Vogt, and G. H. Hoffstaetter, In EPAC98, St ockholm, 1998. 25. D. P. Barber, G. H. Hoffstaetter, and M. Vogt, In [2] 26. N. Golubeva, In [2] 27. Ya. V. Derbenev, In [2]1100.0040.0080.012 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8/AF /AN /BC /C5/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CX/D2 /BZ/CT/CE/BB 00.010.020.030.040.05 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40/AF /AN /BC /C5/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CX/D2 /BZ/CT/CE/BB 00.20.40.60.811.2 780 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820/AF /AN /BC /C5/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CX/D2 /BZ/CT/CE/BB Figure 1: Resonance strength for DESY III, PETRA, andHERA.0.40.81.21.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 /BO Ꜷ /B4 /DI /D2/BN /DI /D2/BC /B5 /BQ /C5/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CX/D2 /BZ/CT/CE/BB 00.40.81.21.6 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 /BO Ꜷ /B4 /DI /D2/BN /DI /D2/BC /B5 /BQ /C5/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CX/D2 /BZ/CT/CE/BB 00.40.81.21.6 780 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 /BO Ꜷ /B4 /DI /D2/BN /DI /D2/BC /B5 /BQ /C5/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CX/D2 /BZ/CT/CE/BB Figure 2: Opening angle for DESY III, PETRA, and HERA.

arXiv:physics/0006008v1 [physics.acc-ph] 5 Jun 2000Successive approximations for charged particle motion G. H. Hoffstaetter∗ Deutsches Elektronen–Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg, Germa ny To H. Rose on the occasion of his 65th birthday Single particle dynamics in electron microscopes, ion or el ectron lithographic instruments, particle accelerators, and particle spectrographs is described by weakly nonlinear ordinary di fferential equations. Therefore, the linear part of the equa tion of motion is usually solved and the nonlinear effects are then fo und in successive order by iteration methods. When synchrotron radiation is not important, the equation c an be derived from a Hamiltonian or a Lagrangian. The Hamil- tonian nature can lead to simplified computations of particl e transport through an optical device when a suitable comput ational method is used. H. Rose and his school have contributed to the se techniques by developing and intensively using the eikon al method [1–3]. Many ingenious microscopic and lithographic devices were found by Rose and his group due to the simple structure of this method [4–6]. The particle optical eikonal method is either derived by pro pagating the electron wave or by the principle of Maupertuis for time independent fields. Maybe because of the time dependent fields which are often required, in the area of accelerator ph ysics the eikonal method has never become popular, although Lagra nge methods had been used sometimes already in early days [7] . In this area classical Hamilitonian dynamics is usually use d to compute nonlinear particle motion. Here I will therefor e derive the eikonal method from a Hamiltonian quite familiar to the a ccelerator physics community. With the event of high energy polarized electron beams [8] an d plans for high energy proton beams [9], nonlinear effects in spin motion have become important in high energy accelerato rs. I will introduce a successive approximation for the nonl inear effects in the coupled spin and orbit motion of charged partic les which resembles some of the simplifications resulting fr om the eikonal method for the pure orbit motion. I. INTRODUCTION The well known Lagrange variational principle requires δ/integraldisplay Ldt=δ/integraldisplay [/vector˜p·˙/vector q− H]dt= 0 (1.1) with the Lagrangian L, Hamiltonian H, and generalized momenta /vector˜pand coordinates /vector q. In this principle all variations of /vector q(t) are allowed and therefore the Euler–Lagrange equations of motion hold, d dt∂˙/vector qL(/vector q,˙/vector q, t) =∂/vector qL(/vector q,˙/vector q, t). (1.2) For relativistic single particle motion the Lagrangian is L=−mc/radicalig c2−˙/vector r2+e˙/vector r·/vectorA−eΦ (1.3) where the position /vector r(/vector q) is a function of the generalized coordinates /vector q. The Jacobian matrix rof this function can be written in the form r= (∂/vector q/vector rT)Tand has the elements rij=∂qjri. In this efficient notation /vector rTis the transpose ∗Georg.Hoffstaetter@desy.deof the 3 ×1 matrix /vector r. The Jacobian matrix of the function ˙/vector r(˙/vector q) is also rsince ˙/vector r=/summationtext3 i=1˙qi∂qi/vector r=r˙/vector q. The generalized momentum is /vector˜p=∂˙/vector qL=rT(mγ˙/vector r+ e/vectorA) and the variational principle can thus be written as δ/integraldisplay [/vector˜pTr−1˙/vector r− H]dt=δ/integraldisplay [(mγ˙/vector r+e/vectorA)Trr−1˙/vector r− H]dt =δ/integraldisplay [mγv2+e/vectorAT˙/vector r− H]dt .(1.4) If only variations δH=Eare considered which keep the total energy H=Econstant, the variational principle becomes δH=E/integraldisplay [/vector˜p·˙/vector q− H]dt=δH=E/integraldisplay /vector˜p·d/vector q =δH=E/integraldisplay [mγv2+e/vectorAT˙/vector r]dt= 0. (1.5) The variational principle for constant total energy is called the principle of Maupertuis. However, in equa- tion (1.5) it does not lead to Euler–Lagrange equations of motion, since not all variations are allowed. A particle optical device usually has an optical axis or some design curve along which a particle beam should travel. This design curve /vectorR(l) is parameterized by a vari- ableland the position of a particle in the vicinity of the design curve has coordinates xandyalong the unit vec- tors/vector exand/vector eyin a plane perpendicular this curve. This coordinate system is shown in figure 1. The third coordi- nate vector /vector el=d/vectorR/dlis tangential to the design curve and the curvature vector is /vector κ=−d/vector el/dl. 1The unit vectors /vector exand/vector eyin the usual Frenet–Serret comoving coordinate system rotate with the torsion of the design curve. If this rotation is wound back, the equations of motion do not contain the torsion of the design curve. The position and the velocity are /vector r=x/vector ex+y/vector ey+/vectorR(l),˙/vector r= ˙x/vector ex+ ˙y/vector ey+h˙l/vector el,(1.6) withh= 1 + xκx+yκy. This method is described in [3] and [10] and is mentioned here since design curves with torsion are becoming important when considering particle motion in helical wigglers, undulators, and wave- length shifters [11], and for polarized particle motion in helical dipole Siberian Snakes [12]./BY/C1/BZ/CD/CA/BX/CB/DI /CT/DC /DI /CT/DD/DI/CA /B4 /D0 /B5 /DC/BN /DD /AK/DC /BN /AK/DD/BDFIG. 1. Curvatures κx,κyof the design curve and general- ized coordinates x,y, and l. The variational principle (1.5) for the three general- ized coordinates x(t),y(t), and l(t) can now be writ- ten for the two generalized coordinates x(l) and y(l). This has the following two advantages: a) The parti- cle trajectory along the design curve is usually more im- portant than the particle position at a time t, and b) Whereas δH=Edoes not allow for all variations of the three coordinates, the total energy can be conserved for all variations of the two coordinates xandyby choos- ing for each position /vector rthe appropriate momentum with mγv =/radicalbig (E−eΦ(/vector r))2/c2−(mc)2. We obtain from equation (1.5) δH=E/integraldisplay /vector˜p·d/vector q=δ/integraldisplay [mγv2dt dl+ev/vectorA·d/vector r dl]dl= 0 (1.7) withd/vector r/dl =x′/vector ex+y′/vector ey+h/vector elanddt/dl =|d/vector r/dl|/v.Since all variations are allowed, the integrand is a very simple new Lagrangian ˜L=mγv/radicalig x′2+y′2+h2+e(x′Ax+y′Ay+hAl) (1.8) which leads to Euler–Lagrange equations of motion ˜px=∂x′˜L ,˜p′ x=∂x˜L , (1.9) ˜py=∂y′˜L ,˜p′ y=∂y˜L . (1.10) The integral/integraltextl 0˜L(˜l)d˜lis called the eikonal. Since the Hamiltonian formulation is very common in the area of accelerator physics, we will show how the eikonal can be derived from a Hamiltonian formulation. The equations of motion for the three generalized co- ordinates x(t),y(t), and l(t) can be obtained from the Hamiltonian H=eΦ + (1.11)/radicalig m2c2+ (˜px−eAx)2+ (˜py−eAy)2+ (˜pl/h−eAl)2. In the case of time independent fields, His the con- served total energy Eand there are only five indepen- dent variables, rather than six. Note that the veloc- ity dependent or non holonomic [13] boundary condition H(/vector p(/vector q,˙/vector q), /vector q, t) =Ecannot be included in the Lagrange formalism directly. But in the Hamilton formalism this can be done. Furthermore, a switch of independent vari- able from ttolcan easily be done in the Hamiltonian for- mulation. The Lagrange formulation is therefore aban- doned (too easily, as will be shown later). In the varia- tional condition δ/integraldisplay [ ˙x˜px+ ˙y˜py+˙l˜pl− H]dt= 0 (1.12) one can change to the independent variable las follows: δ/integraldisplay [x′˜px+y′˜py+ (−t′)H −(−˜pl)]dl= 0.(1.13) The six canonical coordinates are now x, ˜px,y, ˜py,−t, andH, and the new Hamiltonian is given by ˜H=−˜pl which has to be expressed as a function of the six coor- dinates [14,15], ˜H=−h/bracketleftbigg eAl+ (1.14) /radicalig (H −eΦ)2−(mc2)2−(˜px−eAx)2−(˜py−eAy)2/bracketrightbigg . In the Hamilton formalism it is simple to take advantage of the fact that the total energy is conserved for time independent fields; H′=∂t˜H= 0 leads to H=E. Then from the six coordinates only the first four have to be considered, leading to the Lagrangian ˜L=x′˜px+y′˜py−˜H . (1.15) 2From x′=∂˜px˜H=h√(˜px−eAx),y′=∂˜py˜H=h√(˜py− eAy) where√ is the square root in ˜Hone obtains √ =h/radicaligg (E−eΦ)2−(mc2)2 x′2+y′2+h2 =mγvh/radicalbig x′2+y′2+h2, (1.16) ˜px=√ hx′+eAx,˜py=√ hy′+eAy, (1.17) ˜L=mγv/radicalig x′2+y′2+h2+e(x′Ax+y′Ay+hAl) (1.18) formγv=/radicalbig (E−eΦ)2/c2−(mc)2. The very simple La- grangian ˜Lagrees with the integrand (1.8) of the eikonal. In the following it will be shown how the Hamiltonian and the Lagrangian equations of motion for the particle trajectory /vector q(l) can be solved in an iterative way. We write a general equation of motion for a coordinate vector /vector zin the form /vector z′=/vectorf1(/vector z, l) +/vectorf≥2(/vector z, l) (1.19) where we assume that /vector z= 0 is a solution of the differen- tial equation. Furthermore, we assume /vector zto be small and let/vectorf1be linear in the coordinates. We assume that the nonlinear part of the equation of motion can be expanded in a Taylor series /vectorf≥2. The linearized equation of motion is solved by a trajectory /vector z1(l) =M(l)/vector ziwhich depends linearly on the initial coordinates. For the transport ma- trixM(l) we therefore have M′/vector zi=f1M/vector zi (1.20) for all coordinate vectors /vector zi;f1being the Jacobian matrix of/vectorf1. One can write every solution of (1.19) as /vector z(l) = M(l)/vectorζ(l), leading to the equation of motion M′/vectorζ+M/vectorζ′=f1M/vectorζ+/vectorf≥2(/vector z). (1.21) The Taylor coefficients of /vectorζ(/vector zi, l) with respect to the ini- tial coordinates /vector zi=/vectorζ(0) are called aberration coeffi- cients. With equation (1.20) one obtains /vector z(l) =M(l){/vector zi+/integraldisplayl 0M−1(˜l)/vectorf≥2(/vector z(˜l))}d˜l . (1.22) Now we assume that the general solution /vector z(/vector zi, l) can be expanded in a power series with respect to the ini- tial coordinates. Then symbolizing the jth order Taylor polynomial with [ . . .]j, we write the orders up to jas /vector zj= [/vector z(/vector zi, l)]j, i.e. we use lower indices to describe the order of /vector zi. The upper index in /vectorfdescribes the order in /vector z, which is in turn a nonlinear function of /vector zi. When /vector zn−1is known, one can iterate the expansion up to order n with equation (1.22), since /vector zn=M(l){/vector zi+/integraldisplayl 0M−1(˜l)[/vectorf≥2(/vector zn−1)]n}d˜l .(1.23) The zeroth order of the expansion with respect to the coordinates must vanish, which means that the trajec- tory/vector q= 0 must satisfy the equation of motion for some momentum p(l). Additionally we require that the vector potential on the design curve is gauged to zero. This can always be achieved. The canonical momentum /vector pthen also vanishes for the trajectory /vector q= 0. It then follows that the Hamiltonian and the Lagrangian have no com- ponents linear in the coordinates and momenta. When computing trajectories through a particle optical device, it is customary to normalize the momenta to the initial design momentum p0=p(0). The following two dimen- sional generalized coordinates are therefore used: /vector q=/parenleftbiggx y/parenrightbigg , /vector p=/parenleftbigg˜px/p0 ˜py/p0/parenrightbigg , (1.24) L(/vector q, /vector q′, l) =˜L/p0, /vector p=∂/vector q′L , /vector p′=∂/vector qL , H(/vector q, /vector p, l) =˜H/p0, /vector q′=∂/vector pH , /vector p′=−∂/vector qH . The Euler–Lagrange equations lead to the second order differential equationsd dl∂/vector q′L=∂/vector qLfor the two dimen- sional vector /vector q. II. SUCCESSIVE APPROXIMATION IN TERMS OF HAMILTONIANS In the Hamilton formalism one obtains first order equa- tions of motion for the four dimensional vector /vector zT= (q1, q2, p1, p2). With the antisymmetric matrix Jone can write the equation of motion as J=/parenleftbigg 0212 −1202/parenrightbigg , /vector z′=J∂/vector zH , (2.1) with the 2 ×2 identity and zero matrixes 12and 02. This structure implies special symmetries for the trans- port maps /vectorMof particle optics. These maps describe how the final phase space coordinates /vector zf=/vectorM(/vector zi) of a particle, after flying through an optical device, are re- lated to the initial coordinates /vector zi. These maps are often weakly nonlinear and can be expanded in a Taylor expan- sion. The Hamiltonian nature implies that the Jacobian M= (∂/vector z/vectorMT)Tof any transport map /vectorM(/vector z) is symplectic [13], meaning that MJMT=J. (2.2) For the successive approximations we separate the equation of motion into its linear and nonlinear part, /vector z′=J∂/vector z(H2+H≥3). (2.3) 3After we have solved for the linear transport matrix /vector z1= M/vector zi, we can iterate by equation (1.23) which takes the form /vector zn=M{/vector zi+/integraldisplayl 0M−1[J∂/vector zH≥3(/vector zn−1)]nd˜l} (2.4) With the relation M−1J=JMTfrom equation (2.2) this can be written as /vector zn=M{/vector zi+J/integraldisplayl 0MT[∂/vector zH≥3(/vector zn−1)]nd˜l}.(2.5) The corresponding equation for the aberrations /vectorζn= M−1/vector znbecomes /vectorζn=/vector zi+J/integraldisplayl 0[∂/vectorζH≥3(M/vectorζn−1)]nd˜l . (2.6) This form of the iteration equation is quite simple. How- ever, since the Hamiltonian (1.14) is a complicated func- tion, the evaluation of the four integrals can become very cumbersome. III. SUCCESSIVE APPROXIMATION IN TERMS OF LAGRANGIANS In [3] Rose used a variational principle to derive a suc- cessive approximation to nonlinear motion based on the eikonal. This method iterates position /vector qand momentum /vector pin their nonlinear dependence on the initial position /vector qi and momentum /vector pi. Knowing the order n−1 dependence /vector qn−1and/vector pn−1, one has to compute /vector q′ n−1by differentia- tion of /vector qn−1or by inversion of /vector p=∂/vector q′L(/vector q, /vector q′, l). Then the eikonal can be evaluated to compute the order nde- pendence /vector qnand/vector pn. In general it can be cumbersome to compute /vector q′ n−1and therefore here we derive a new version of the eikonal method, which iterates directly /vector q′ nrather than the momentum. In deriving the simple form of equation (2.6), advan- tage has only been taken of the symplectic first order transfer matrix. We therefore wish to exploit this ad- vantage again by working with new coordinates which are identical with the canonical /vector qand/vector pup to first order so that the new coordinates lead to the same first order transport matrix M. To first order one obtains /vector p=∂/vector q′L=p(s) p0/vector q′+e p0/parenleftbiggA1 x A1y/parenrightbigg +O2(/vector q, /vector q′) (3.1) where p(s) is the momentum of a particle traveling on the design curve /vector q= 0, and the upper index 1 specifies the part of the vector potential linear in xandy. We therefore work with the coordinates /vectorQ=/parenleftbigg/vector q /vector u/parenrightbigg =/parenleftbigg/vector q p(s) p0/vector q′+e p0/parenleftbigA1x A1 y/parenrightbig/parenrightbigg . (3.2)Moreover, it can be shown [16,3,17,18] that the contribu- tion from the vector potential can be gauged to vanish whenever there is no longitudinal magnetic field B0/vector elon the design curve. Then if one investigates trajectories which start with momentum p0in a region free of such a field, we have the simple relation /vector ui=/vector q′ i. By splitting the Lagrangian into its second order and its higher order part, the equation of motion becomes /vectorQ′=/parenleftbigg/vector q /vector u/parenrightbigg′ (3.3) =/parenleftbiggp0 p(s)/vector u−e p(s)/parenleftbigA1 x A1y/parenrightbig ∂/vector qL2/parenrightbigg −/parenleftbigg0 d d˜l∂/vector q′L≥3−∂/vector qL≥3/parenrightbigg . After having solved the linearized equation of motion, we obtain with equation (1.23) /vectorQ=M{/vectorQi−/integraldisplayl 0M−1/parenleftbigg0 d d˜l∂/vector q′L≥3−∂/vector qL≥3/parenrightbigg d˜l}(3.4) =M{/vectorQi+J/integraldisplayl 0MT/parenleftbiggd d˜l∂/vector q′L≥3−∂/vector qL≥3 0/parenrightbigg d˜l}. An integration by parts leads to /vectorQ=M{/vectorQi−J/integraldisplayl 0[M′T/parenleftbigg∂/vector q′L≥3 0/parenrightbigg +MT/parenleftbigg∂/vector qL≥3 0/parenrightbigg ]d˜l +J/bracketleftbigg MT/parenleftbigg∂/vector q′L≥3 0/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbiggl 0}. (3.5) Writing the Jacobian as MT=∂/vectorQi/vectorQT 1=∂/vectorQi(/vectorQ−/vectorQ≥2)T where /vectorQ=/vectorQ1+/vectorQ≥2was split into parts which depend on/vectorQilinearly and nonlinearly, we obtain M−1/vectorQ=/vectorQi−J/integraldisplayl 0[(∂/vectorQi(/vector q′T−/vector q′T ≥2))∂/vector q′L≥3 +(∂/vectorQi(/vector qT−/vector qT ≥2))∂/vector qL≥3]d˜l+J/bracketleftbigg (∂/vectorQi/vector qT 1)∂/vector q′L≥3/bracketrightbiggl 0 =/vectorQi−J/integraldisplayl 0[∂/vectorQiL≥3−(∂/vectorQi/vector q′T ≥2)∂/vector q′(L−L2) −(∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)∂/vector q(L−L2)]d˜l+J/bracketleftbigg (∂/vectorQi/vector qT 1)∂/vector q′L≥3/bracketrightbiggl 0 =/vectorQi−J/integraldisplayl 0[∂/vectorQiL≥3+ (∂/vectorQi/vector q′T ≥2)∂/vector q′L2+ (∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)∂/vector qL2 −(∂/vectorQi/vector q′T ≥2)∂/vector q′L−(∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)d d˜l∂/vector q′L]d˜l +J/bracketleftbigg (∂/vectorQi/vector qT 1)∂/vector q′L≥3/bracketrightbiggl 0. (3.6) Note that the A′ x,A′ y,p(s) and p0of equation (3.2) drop out of the right hand side of equation (3.6) owing to the multiplications by the zeros in equation (3.5). The second order L2of the Lagrangian is a quadratic form in which 4every quadratic combination of the /vector qand/vector q′can occur. It can be written using a matrix L2asL2=/vectorQTL2/vectorQ. Part of the above integrand can be rewritten as /vector q′T ≥2∂/vector q′L2+/vector qT ≥2∂/vector qL2=/vectorQT ≥2L2/vectorQ+/vectorQTL2/vectorQ≥2.(3.7) For convenience we write L2(/vector a) =/vector aTL2/vector a. Another inte- gration by parts in equation (3.6) leads to M−1/vectorQ=/vectorQi−J/integraldisplayl 0[∂/vectorQi(L≥3+L2(/vectorQ≥2)) +(∂/vectorQi/vector q′T ≥2)∂/vector q′ 1L2(/vectorQ1) + (∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)∂/vector q1L2(/vectorQ1)]d˜l +J/bracketleftbigg (∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)∂/vector q′L+ (∂/vectorQi/vector qT 1)∂/vector q′L≥3/bracketrightbiggl 0.(3.8) The first part of the integral contains LE=L≥3+ L2(/vectorQ≥2). The integral/integraltextl 0LEd˜lis called the perturbation eikonal. This scheme embodies the essential requirement that the n+1 order dependence of LEon the initial vari- ables /vectorQican be computed already when Qn−1is known; /vectorQndoes not need to be known. For an iteration of /vectorQn, knowledge of /vectorQn−1is sufficient. Since /vector q1satisfies the first order equation of motion, we can use the relation ∂/vector q1L2(/vectorQ1) =d dl∂/vector q′ 1L2(/vectorQ1) to perform another integra- tion by parts, M−1/vectorQ=/vectorQi−J∂/vectorQi/integraldisplayl 0LEd˜l+J/bracketleftbigg (∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)∂/vector q′L +(∂/vectorQi/vector qT 1)∂/vector q′L≥3−(∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)∂/vector q′ 1L2(/vectorQ1)/bracketrightbiggl 0 =/vectorQi−J∂/vectorQi/integraldisplayl 0LEd˜l+J/bracketleftbigg (∂/vectorQi/vector qT)∂/vector q′L −(∂/vectorQi/vector qT 1)∂/vector q′L2−(∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)∂/vector q′ 1L2(/vectorQ1)/bracketrightbiggl 0.(3.9) ∂/vectorQiLEis the part of ∂/vectorQiLwhich up to order nin/vectorQi does not depend on /vectorQn. Similarly the term outside the integral is simply the part of ( ∂/vectorQi/vector qT)∂/vector q′Lwhich up to order ndoes not depend on /vectorQn. We therefore write (∂/vectorQi/vector qT)∂/vector q′L−(∂/vectorQi/vector qT 1)∂/vector q′L2−(∂/vectorQi/vector qT ≥2)∂/vector q′ 1L2(/vectorQ1) = {(∂/vectorQi/vector qT)∂/vector q′L}E. If we now express the Lagrangian in terms of the aberrations /vectorξwith/vectorQ=M/vectorξ, we obtain the iteration equation /vectorξn=n/vectorQi−J∂/vectorQi/integraldisplayl 0LE(M/vectorξn−1)d˜l (3.10) +J/bracketleftbigg {(∂/vectorQi/vector qT)∂/vector q′L}E/bracketrightbiggl 0. When computing /vectorξnfrom/vectorξn−1with this iteration equa- tion, all parts of the right hand side which contribute to higher orders are neglected, as indicated by = n. This iteration equation can have several advantages over the Hamiltonian iteration equation (1.23):a) The Lagrangian (1.8) is a much simpler function than the Hamiltonian (1.14). b) The derivative in equation (3.10) is performed after the integral has been evaluated. Therefore only one integral has to be computed and it describes all four coordinates of /vectorξn. c) The fact that the various coordinates are the derivatives with respect to initial conditions yields very simple relations [19] between the various ex- pansion coefficients of /vectorξn, which are the so called aberration coefficients of particle optical devices. These relations can be much simpler than relations entailed by the symplectic symmetry implicit in the Hamiltonian formulation. d) The second pair of coordinates in equation (3.2) can be calculated very easily. With equations (1.21) and (3.3), the equation of motion for /vectorξis M/vectorξ′=/parenleftbigg0 d d˜l∂/vector q′L≥3−∂/vector qL≥3/parenrightbigg . (3.11) After having computed /vector qn=/vectorM2×4/vectorξnby iteration, the derivative /vector q′can then easily be computed as /vector q′ n=/vectorM′ 2×4/vectorξnusing equation (3.11). One thus only needs to iterate the two dimensional vector /vector qnand not a four dimensional vector /vector znas in the Hamil- tonian iteration procedure. IV. SUCCESSIVE APPROXIMATION FOR SPIN ORBIT MOTION The time variation of a spin /vector sin the rest frame of a particle is described by the so called Thomas–BMT equation ˙/vector s=/vectorΩBMT×/vector s[20,21] where /vectorΩBMT=−q mγ{(aγ+ 1)/vectorB⊥+ (1 + a)/vectorB/bardbl (4.1) −γ c/vectorβ×/vectorE(a+1 1 +γ)} with the electric field /vectorE, the parts of the magnetic field /vectorB which are perpendicular ( ⊥) and parallel ( /bardbl) to the par- ticle’s velocity, and the anomalous gyro-magnetic factor a=g−2 2. Changing to the comoving coordinate system of fig- ure (1), we obtain /vector s=Sx/vector ex+Sy/vector ey+Sl/vector eland/vector s′= (S′ x−Slκx)/vector ex+ (S′ y−Slκy)/vector ey+ (S′ l+Sxκx+Syκy)/vector el. The equation of motion for the vector /vectorSof these spin components is then /vectorS′=/vectorΩ×/vectorS , (4.2) /vectorΩ =/vectorΩBMTh v/radicalbig x′2+y′2+h2−/vector κ×/vector el. 5The equations of motion for the phase space vector /vector zand the spin /vectorShave the form /vector z′=/vectorf(/vector z, l),/vectorS′=/vectorΩ(/vector z, l)×/vectorS . (4.3) The general solutions transporting the coordinates along the optical system, starting at the initial values /vector zi,/vectorSi, is given by the transport map Mand the rotation matrix R∈SO(3), /vector z(l) =/vectorM(/vector zi, l),/vectorS(l) =R(/vector zi, l)/vectorSi. (4.4) In order to find the general solution, one could compute the nine coefficients of the rotation matrix by solving the differential equation Rij(/vector zi, l)′=ǫilkΩlRkj(/vector zi, l), (4.5) where the vector product was expressed by the totally antisymmetric tensor ǫilk. However, computing the nine components of the rotation matrix seems inefficient, since a rotation can be represented by three angles. It has turned out [22] to be most efficient to represent the rota- tion of spins by the quaternion Awhich gives the rotation transformation in the SU(2) representation as A=a01−i/vector a·/vector σ. (4.6) Here 1 is the 2 ×2 identity matrix and the elements of the vector /vector σare the three two dimensional Pauli matrixes. When a rotation by an angle φis performed around the unit vector /vector e, the quaternion representation of the ro- tation has a0= cos( φ/2) and /vector a= sin( φ/2)/vector e. Therefore a2 0+/vector a2= 1 and the identity transformation is represented bya0= 1. If a particle traverses an optical element which rotates the spin according to the quaternion Aand then passes through an element which rotates the spin according to the quaternion B, the total rotation of the spin is given by C=c01−i/vector c·/vector σ= (b01−i/vectorb·/vector σ)(a01−i/vector a·/vector σ) = (b0a0−/vectorb·/vector a)1−i(b0/vector a+/vectorba0+/vectorb×/vector a)·/vector σ.(4.7) The concatenation of quaternions can be written in ma- trix form as /vectorC=/parenleftbiggc0 /vector c/parenrightbigg =B/parenleftbigga0 /vector a/parenrightbigg , (4.8) B= b0−b1−b2−b3 b1b0−b3b2 b2b3b0−b1 b3−b2b1b0 . This concatenation of two quaternions can be used to find a differential equation for the spin rotation. While propagating along the design curve by a distance dl, spins are rotated by an angle Ω dl=|Ω|dlaround the vector /vectorΩ. After having been propagated to lby thequaternion A, a spin gets propagated from ltol+dlby the quaternion with b0= 1 and /vectorb=1 2/vectorΩdl. The resulting total rotation is given by A+A′dland we obtain the differential equation /parenleftbigga′ 0 /vector a′/parenrightbigg =1 2 0−Ω1−Ω2−Ω3 Ω10−Ω3Ω2 Ω2Ω3 0−Ω1 Ω3−Ω2Ω10 /parenleftbigga0 /vector a/parenrightbigg .(4.9) Writing the matrix as Ω and the vector as /vectorA, the spin orbit equation of motion has the form /vector z′=/vectorf(/vector z, l),/vectorA′= Ω(/vector z, l)/vectorA . (4.10) The starting conditions are /vector z(0) = /vector z0,a0= 1, and /vector a= 0. The quaternion Adepends on the initial phase space coordinates /vector ziand can be expanded in a Taylor series with respect to these coordinates. In the following we want to devise an iteration method for An, which is the Taylor expansion to order nofA. The rotation vector /vectorΩ is split into its value on the design curve and its phase space dependent part as /vectorΩ(/vector z, l) =/vectorΩ0(l)+/vectorΩ≥1(/vector z, l). The spin motion on the design curve is given by /vectorA′ 0(l) = Ω0/vectorA0(l). Similarly to equation (1.21), spin aberrations are defined with respect to the leading order motion. Small phase space coordinates will create a rotation which differs little from /vectorA0(l) and we write the phase space dependent rotation as a concatena- tion of /vectorA0and the /vector zdependent rotation (1 + δ,/vectorδ) which reduces to the identity for /vector z= 0 by requiring that the aberrations δand/vectorδvanish on the design curve. With equation (4.8) we obtain /vectorA=A0/parenleftbigg1 +δ /vectorδ/parenrightbigg . (4.11) The quaternion Ais now inserted in the differential equa- tion (4.10) to obtain A′ 0/parenleftbigg1 +δ /vectorδ/parenrightbigg +A0/parenleftbiggδ′ /vectorδ′/parenrightbigg = (Ω0+ Ω≥1)A0/parenleftbigg1 +δ /vectorδ/parenrightbigg . (4.12) Taking into account the equation on the design curve and the fact that AT 0describes the inverse rotation of A0, we obtain /parenleftbiggδ′ /vectorδ′/parenrightbigg = (AT 0Ω≥1A0)/parenleftbigg1 +δ /vectorδ/parenrightbigg =˜Ω(/vector z, l)/parenleftbigg1 +δ /vectorδ/parenrightbigg .(4.13) Writing the Taylor expansion to order nin/vector zione finally obtains the iteration equation /parenleftbiggδn /vectorδn/parenrightbigg =n/integraldisplayl 0˜Ω(/vector zn)/parenleftbigg1 +δn−1 /vectorδn−1/parenrightbigg d˜l ,/parenleftbiggδ0 /vectorδ0/parenrightbigg = 0.(4.14) 6This iteration method was used for the spin transport in the program SPRINT [22] and was evaluated using MATHEMATICA in [23]. In the case of successive approximation in terms of the Hamiltonian, the various aberration coefficients were related by the symplectic symmetry. With the Lagrange formalism the various aberration coefficients were related by their being derivatives of a common integral with respect to different initial coordinates. In the case of the successive approximation for spin motion, the vari- ous aberration coefficients in /vectorδandδare related by the relation (1 + δ)2+/vectorδ2= 0. Acknowledgment I owe thanks to D. Barber, H. Mais, and M. Vogt for thoroughly reading the manuscript and for the resulting improvements. [1] H. Rose and U. Petri. Optik, 33:151, 1971. [2] E. Plies and D. Typke. Dreidimensional abbildende Eledtronenmikroskope II. Theorie elektronenoptischer Systeme mit gekr¨ ummter Achse. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Natur- forschung, 33a, 1361-1377 , 1978. [3] H. Rose. Hamiltonian magnetic optics. Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods in Physics Research , A258:374–401, 1987. [4] H. Rose. Correction of aperture aberrations in magnetic systems with threefold symmetry aberration. Nuclear In- struments and Methods 187, 187-199 , 1981. [5] H. Rose. Outline of a spherically corrected semiaplanat ic medium-voltage transmission electron microscope. Optic, 85(1):19–24, 1990. [6] H. Rose, M. Haider, and K. Urban. Elektronen- mikroskopie mit atomarer Aufl¨ osung. Physikalische Bl¨ atter , 54(5):411–416, 1998. [7] P. A. Sturrock. Static and dynamic electron optics, Part II. Cambridge University Press, p. 149, 1995. [8] D. P. Barber, et al. The first achievement of longitudinal spin polarization in a high energy electron storage ring. Physics Letters , B(343):436–443, 1995. [9] SPIN Collaboration and the DESY Polarization Team. Acceleration of polarized protons to 820 GeV at HERA. UM–HR 96–20, University of Michigan Report, 1996. [10] G. H. Hoffst¨ atter. Nonlinear dependence of synchrotro n radiation on beam parameters. In Proceedings of PAC 94, Dallas/TX , 1995. [11] G. W¨ ustefeld. Orbit maps for helical snake and heli- cal undulator magnets. In Proceedings of the workshop “Polarized Protons at High Energies” , DESY, Hamburg, 1999. [12] A. Luccio and T. Roser. Third workshop on Siberian Snakes and spin rotators. formal report BNL-52453,Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, 1994. [13] H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics . Addison-Wesley, Reading/MA, USA, 1980. Second edition. [14] E. D. Courant and H. S. Snyder. Theory of the alternating–gradient synchrotron. Annals of physics , 3:1– 48, 1958. [15] H. Mais. Some topics in beam dynamics of storage rings. formal report DESY 96–119, DESY, 1996. [16] E. Plies and H. Rose. ¨Uber die axialen Bildfehler mag- netischer Ablenksysteme mit krummer Achse. Optik 34, 2, 171-190 , 1971. [17] G. Hoffst¨ atter. Geometrische Elektronenoptik angewa ndt auf ein durch Hexapole korrigiertes Mikroskop mit sub ˚Angstr¨ om Aufl¨ osung. Master’s thesis, Darmstadt Univer- sity of Technology, 1991. [18] G. H. Hoffst¨ atter and H. Rose. Gauge invariance in the eikonal method. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research , A328:398–401, 1993. [19] G. H. Hoffstaetter. Comments on aberration correction in symmetric imaging energy filters. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research , page accepted, 1998. [20] L. H. Thomas. Phil. Mag. , 3:1, 1927. [21] V. Bargmann, L. Michel, and V. L. Telegdi. Precession of the polarization of particles moving in a homogeneous electromagnetic field. Physical Review Letters , 2(10):435– 436, 1959. [22] K. Heinemann and G. H. Hoffst¨ atter. A tracking algo- rithm for the stable spin polarization field in storage rings using stroboscopic averaging. Physical Review E , 54:4240–4255, 1996. and official DESY Report 96–078. [23] Ch. Weißb¨ acker. Nichtlineare Effekte der Spindynamik in Protonenbeschleunigern. Master’s thesis, Darmstadt University of Technology, 1998. 7

arXiv:physics/0006009v1 [physics.data-an] 7 Jun 2000Singularities in kinetic theory C.Y. Chen Dept. of Physics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, PRC Email: cychen@public2.east.net.cn Abstract: It is revealed that distribution functions of practical gas es relate to singularities and such singularities can, with molecula r motion, spread to the entire region of interest. It is also shown that even comm on continuous distribution functions involve a similar quasi-discontin uity difficulty. PACS numbers: 51.10.+y. 1It is widely assumed that the necessary and complete foundat ion of ki- netic theory has been established and the main problem in thi s field is the lack of powerful computational means: if a sufficiently large supercomputer were available we would be able to solve the well-known Boltz mann-type equations in terms of initial and boundary conditions and th e behavior of most practical gases would become analyzable and calculabl e[1][2]. In view of that similar partial differential equations in fluid mecha nics can be han- dled by today’s computers and the obtained results appear to be reasonably good (to a certain extent), it seems that the aforementioned notion concern- ing kinetic theory is indeed sound and cannot, thus should no t, be challenged seriously. In studying several kinds of gases one, however, found that s ingularities arose from the standard treatment[3]. Unlike singularitie s that exist for usual partial differential systems, the observed singulari ties are not limited to isolated regions; molecular motion carries them to nearb y regions as well as distant regions (though collisions between molecules er ase them partly). Being exposed to such difficulties, we no longer believe that t he principal way of studying kinetic gases is to have Boltzmann-type equa tions. The purpose of this paper is to arouse concern for the singula rity aspect of the standard kinetic theory. We present realistic exampl es in that discon- tinuous distribution functions come to exist and applicati on of differential operator to them becomes risky and misleading. Most of analy ses are carried out in terms of solving the collisionless Boltzmann equatio n numerically and analytically. At the end we briefly discuss in what way we may o vercome the difficulties revealed herein. First of all, let us take a brief look at how the Boltzmann equa tion can be solved in terms of the standard procedure. The equation re ads ∂f ∂t+v·∂f ∂r+F m·∂f ∂v=/integraldisplay [f(v′)f(v′ 1)−f(v)f(v1)]uσdΩdv1,(1) where the left side is sometimes called the convective opera tor and the right side the collisional operator. The detailed meaning of the n otations related to two operators can be found in any textbook[1][4]. To solve the differential- integral equation, we must have the initial condition f(t0+ 0,r,v) =f(t0,r,v) (2) and the boundary condition f(t,r,v) =/integraldisplay K(v,v1)f(t,r,v1)dv1, (3) 2where K(v,v1) represents the collisional nucleus between molecules and boundaries[2][5]. According to the existing kinetic theor y, these equations, from (1) to (3), constitute a complete equation set to descri be the gas dy- namics. It is also noted that to numerically solve the equati on set a finite- difference scheme based on a grid arrangement in the position -velocity space, such as∂f ∂t∼∆f ∆t,∂f ∂x∼∆f ∆x,∂f ∂vx∼∆f ∆vx,······ , (4) should be employed. If all these are ready, we can, by means of a “true” supercomputer, construct solutions for the equation set. F or convenience of later discussion, we will refer to the procedure outlined ab ove, including the equations and all the necessary mathematical treatments, a sthe standard solution-construction scheme of the Boltzmann equation. Enormous difficulties involve in the solution-construction scheme. What have been well known include: (i) There are seven independen t variables: time, geometric coordinates, and velocity components. (ii ) The collisional operator is complicated in nature. Due to these difficulties, only much sim- plified cases have been investigated (one-dimensional case s for instance). In this paper, we put aside these well-known difficulties and try to discuss what may happen when a sufficiently powerful supercomputer is avai lable and a full-dimensional computational job is really performed. For simplicity, we will disregard collisions between molec ules. Never- theless, the discussion in this paper should hold its signifi cance for rarefied gases as well as for ordinary gases. Consider a boundary in the gas shown in Fig. 1. Suppose that th ere initially exists a density difference between the two sides o f the boundary and that the density on the left side is much larger. Obviousl y, molecules on the left side will expand into the space on the right side. At a ny point on the right side, we will surely find out a certain amount of molecul es that come from the left side. By referring to Fig. 2a, we set up a local co ordinate system at a point pon the right side in such a way that the y-direction is parallel to the boundary edge and molecules having passed by the edge will move in the x-direction at the point. It is then simple to see that any molecules that have velocities vz<0 do not come from the left side of the boundary. In Fig. 2b, we schematically plot the velocity distribution atp, which illustrates that the distribution function at vz= 0 involves a discontinuity ∂f ∂vz=∞. (5) 3If the z-component of the external force is not exactly zero (there i s a gravita- tional force, for instance) the convective operator in the B oltzmann equation fails to make sense at vz= 0 ∂f ∂t+v·∂f ∂r+F m·∂f ∂v=∞. (6) The situation is rather worrisome since every spatial point on the right side (as well as the left side) of the boundary involves exactly th e same singularity for exactly the same reason. The singularity discussed above has some thing to do with ext ernal forces. To have a complete picture, we will, in the remaining part of this paper, investigate examples in that no external force exist s. We consider a gas leaking out of a container through a small ho le, as shown in Fig. 3, which schematically represents how a point- size source emits molecules and how the emitted molecules spread out ove r a free space. At this point, it is worth mentioning that the situation unde r consid- eration is not particularly special. In addition to what hap pen to leaking gases, there are many practical cases in that molecules beha ve like an out- flow from a point-like source. As shown in Fig. 4, a boundary su rface cannot be regarded as a uniform one owning to physical, chemical and geometric differences on it; and this leaves us no choice but to divide th e surface into many small, infinitesimally small according to the spirit of calculus, area elements and examine how those elements reflect molecules. D ue to the fi- nite temperature of the boundary, the “reflected” molecules from each of the area element will spread as if they are emitted from a small ho le. (Emission patterns have been examined by Ref. 5, though from a somewhat different viewpoint.) We first apply the ordinary fluid mechanics to the fluid around t he point pin Fig. 3b. If we further assume that the gas container is rath er large, the outflow must be time-independent during the interested p eriod, which means∂n ∂t= 0. (7) It is easy to find that at the point p ∂n ∂x/negationslash= 0,∂vx ∂x= 0. (8) These expressions tell us that the usual fluid equation ∂n ∂t+∇(vn) = 0 (9) 4does not hold. Can the standard kinetic theory do better? The immediate con cern is to determine the distribution function related to the gas. By r eferring to Fig. 3b, in which the origin of the coordinate system is placed at t he point-like source, we find that the distribution function can be express ed by f(r,v,Ω) =u(v)g(Ω) r2δ(Ω−Ωr), (10) where Ω is the solid angle of the velocity and Ω ris the solid angle of rin the position space, u(v) stands for a function of v=|v|, which may, for instance, be proportional to exp( −µv2/2) and g(Ω) represents a function of Ω. In Eq. (10) the factor r−2is due to the expansion of the molecular paths. It is rather obvious that expression (10) can generally stan d for an outflow emitted by a point-size source. In terms of this distributio n function, we surely have, at the point pagain, ∂f ∂t= 0,F·∂f ∂v= 0 (11) and v·∂f ∂r/negationslash= 0. (12) Similar to what happens to the fluid equation (9), the collisi onless Boltz- mann equation ∂f ∂t+v·∂f ∂r+F m·∂f ∂v= 0 (13) is not valid. When dealing with partial differential equations, it is cust omary to think of singularity as something isolated in a certain domain. Th e singularities revealed in this paper, however, are different: the point pin Fig. 3, as well as the point pin Fig. 2, is chosen rather arbitrarily, and this means such singularities exist in the entire space of interest. To see the deep root of the difficulty, we wish to continue our di scussion on one unusual behavior of continuous distribution functio n. The behavior is well associated with the singularities that have just bee n discussed. In Fig. 5, we schematically depict a gas. Suppose that in the s haded region the density of molecules is significantly larger than those in the nearby regions (however, the continuity of the distribution funct ion is still there). Instead of using the standard solution-construction schem e, we try a slightly different, but analytically much more effective, approach. T hink about how 5the distribution function at the point oinfluences the distribution function atp1and at p2. By relating randvin the the collisionless Boltzmann equation to those of a moving molecule, we can write the equat ion as d f dt/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsinglepath= 0, (14) where the “path” implies that the differentiation is taken al ong a molecular path in the position-velocity phase space. The solution of E q. (14) is simply f(t,r,v)|path= Constant . (15) In other words, we can link the distribution function at a cer tain point to the distribution function at another point if the link exist s in terms of a molecule’s path. For the situation shown in Fig. 5a, we know t hat f(t0,ro,v) =f(t1,rp1,v) =f(t2,rp2,v), (16) wherevis the velocity of the moving molecule (no external force exi sts). In terms of (16), we may say that ois the “source” point and p1orp2is the “image” point. The formulation above seems “exactly” consistent with the s tandard approach. However, there are several things worth special m entioning. As one thing, the path-information of molecules plays an activ e and essential role in this approach while it is considered almost irreleva nt in the equation set (1)-(3). As another thing, this approach is less sensiti ve to singularities. Equation (14) is an ordinary differential equation along a pa th and the singularities associated with (5) and (6), for instance, do not spell much trouble to it. The resultant expression (14) or (15) brings out that, by ref erring to the Fig. 5b, the local distribution functions at p1andp2have cone-like structures. The structures are interesting in the followin g two senses. One is that the cones become sharper and sharper constantly as th e distance between the source and the image increases. The other is that though the initial variation of the distribution function is in the spa tial space, the cone- like structures are formed later on in the velocity spaces of other points. In Fig. 6, we plot the distribution function versus the polar angle in the velocity space. The figure clearly illustrates that with the increase of the distance between the source and the image ∂f ∂θ→very large . (17) 6If the expression ∂f ∂θ→ ∞ (18) is allowed to characterize a true discontinuous distributi on function, see for instance expression (10), it should be appropriate to na me the feature related to (17) as the quasi-discontinuity . It is now in order to comment on the applicability of the stand ard solution-construction scheme outlined at the beginning of the discussion. Equation (17) has shown that even if we assume that the distri bution func- tion under consideration is initially continuous and the ga s is free from boundary effects, the standard scheme will still encounter d ifficulties. As the cones of the velocity spaces become sharper and sharper, too sharp to be described by the chosen grid arrangement, some kinds of δ-functions have to be employed. In this sense, no approach is truly usable unl ess a way is included in which both continuous and discontinuous distri bution functions are treated on a roughly equal footing. Finally, we make a brief examination of possible direction i n which the revealed difficulties can be surmounted. The discussions in this paper have shown that the most essent ial task is to deal with continuous and discontinuous distribution f unctions in a unifying way. After many unsuccessful tries, we are convinc ed that the task can be accomplished by an integral procedure in that the path -information of molecules plays an important role. The reasons for that in clude: (i) Integral operations, unlike differential operations, are u sually not sensitive to discontinuity; if formulated adequately, the behavior of b oth discontinuous and continuous distribution functions can be described. (i i) In discussing the discontinuity and the quasi-discontinuity, we have see n that if the path- information of molecules is made of use, the mental picture, as well as the resultant formulas, becomes much clarified. Based on the conceptions aforementioned, we have developed a path- integral approach[3][6] in that the singularity difficultie s revealed in this paper are removed. Best of all, some of full-dimensional pra ctical gases become calculable in terms of today’s computers. Discussion with Professor Keying Guan is gratefully acknow ledged. His mathematical viewpoint on turbulence is one of the stimulat ing factors of this paper. The work is partly supported by the fund provided by Education Ministry, PRC. 7References [1] F. Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics , (McGraw- Hill book Company, 1965). [2] O.M. Belotserkovskii, Computational Experiment: Direct Numerical Simulation of Complex Gas-dynamics Flows on the Basis of Eul er, Navier-Stokes, and Boltzmann Models , inNumerical Methods in Fluid Dynamicsl Physics edited by H.J. Wirz and J.J. Smolderen, p378, (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1978). [3] C.Y. Chen, Perturbation Methods and Statistical Theories , in English, (International Academic Publishers, Beijing, 1999). [4] E.G. Harris, Introduction to Modern Theoretical Physics , (John Wiley and Sons, 1975). [5] M.N. Kogan, Rarefied Gas Dynamics , (Plenum Press, New York, 1969). [6] C.Y. Chen, A Path-integral Approach to the Collisionless Boltzmann Gas, to be published. 8Figure captions 1. A gas in that density difference is maintained by boundary b locking. 2. Discontinuous distribution function associated with bo undary block- ing. (a) The local coordinate frame at a point p. (b) The distribution function versus vz. 3. A gas leaking out of a container through a small hole. 4. Schematic of molecules reflected by a boundary. 5. A dense gas influencing the nearby and distant regions. 6. Distribution function in terms of the polar angle. (a) In a nearby region. (b) In a distant region. 9Figure 1 (a) (b)---- **** p p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p p Figure 2 (a) (b)----p p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pp p pHHj

x zpf(vz) vz6 -p p p p p p pppppppp p ppppppp Figure 3 (a) (b)o xy pr6 - * * - -HHHHHHHH j j 10Figure 4 (a) (b)  R@@ dS






 6 3R R R@@@@@@  Figure 5 (a) (b) r rr r AAAA ∆Ω2 ∆Ω1p1 p1p2 p2 o

arXiv:physics/0006010v1 [physics.acc-ph] 7 Jun 2000First Observation of Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission i n a Free-Electron Laser at 109 nm Wavelength∗ J. Andruszkow16, B. Aune4, V. Ayvazyan27, N. Baboi10, R. Bakker2, V. Balakin3, D. Barni14, A. Bazhan3, M. Bernard21, A. Bosotti14, J.C. Bourdon21, W. Brefeld6, R. Brinkmann6, S. Buhler19, J.-P. Carneiro9, M. Castellano13, P. Castro6, L. Catani15, S. Chel4, Y. Cho1, S. Choroba6, E. R. Colby9§, W. Decking6, P. Den Hartog1, M. Desmons4, M. Dohlus6, D. Edwards9, H.T. Edwards9, B. Faatz6, J. Feldhaus6, M. Ferrario13, M.J. Fitch26, K. Fl¨ ottmann6, M. Fouaidy19, A. Gamp6, T. Garvey21, M. Geitz10‡, E. Gluskin1, V. Gretchko17, U. Hahn6, W.H. Hartung9, D. Hubert6, M. H¨ uning24, R. Ischebek24, M. Jablonka4, J.M. Joly4, M. Juillard4, T. Junquera19, P. Jurkiewicz16, A. Kabel6§, J. Kahl6, H. Kaiser6, T. Kamps7, V.V. Katelev12, J.L. Kirchgessner23, M. K¨ orfer6, L. Kravchuk17, G. Kreps6, J. Krzywinski18, Lokajczyk6, R. Lange6, B. Leblond21, M. Leenen6, J. Lesrel19, M. Liepe10, A. Liero22, T. Limberg6, R. Lorenz7∗∗, Lu Hui Hua11, Lu Fu Hai6, C. Magne4, M. Maslov12, G. Materlik6, A. Matheisen6, J. Menzel24, P. Michelato14, W.-D. M¨ oller6, A. Mosnier4, U.-C. M¨ uller6, O. Napoly4, A. Novokhatski5, M. Omeich21, H.S. Padamsee23, C. Pagani14, F. Peters6, B. Petersen6, P. Pierini14, J. Pfl¨ uger6, P. Piot6, B. Phung Ngoc4, L. Plucinski10, D. Proch6, K. Rehlich6, S. Reiche10††, D. Reschke6, I. Reyzl6,J. Rosenzweig25, J. Rossbach6‡‡, S. Roth6, E.L. Saldin6, W. Sandner22, Z. Sanok8, H. Schlarb10, G. Schmidt6, P. Schm¨ user10, J.R. Schneider6, E.A. Schneidmiller6, H.-J. Schreiber7, S. Schreiber6, P. Sch¨ utt5, J. Sekutowicz6, L. Serafini14, D. Sertore6, S. Setzer5, S. Simrock6, B. Sonntag10, B. Sparr6, F. Stephan7, V.A. Sytchev12, S. Tazzari15, F. Tazzioli13, M. Tigner23, M. Timm5, M. Tonutti24, E. Trakhtenberg1, R. Treusch6, D. Trines6, V. Verzilov13, T.Vielitz6, V. Vogel3, G. v. Walter24, R. Wanzenberg6, T. Weiland5, H. Weise6, J. Weisend6§, M. Wendt6, M. Werner6, M. M. White1, I. Will22, S. Wolff6, M.V. Yurkov20, K. Zapfe6, P. Zhogolev3, F. Zhou6† 1 Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, 970 0 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA, 2 BESSY, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, 12489 Berlin, German y 3 Branch of the Inst. of Nuclear Physics, 142284 Protvino, Mo scow Region, Russia 4 CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif s/Yvette, France 5 Darmstadt University of Technology, FB18 - Fachgebiet TEM F, Schlossgartenstr. 8, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany 6 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestrasse 85 , 22603 Hamburg, Germany 7 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Platanenallee 6 , 15738 Zeuthen, Germany 8 Faculty of Physics and Nuclear Techniques, University of M ining and Metallurgy, al. Mickiewicza 30, PL-30-059 Cracow , Poland 9 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, MS 306, P.O. Box 50 0, Batavia, IL 60510 USA 10 Hamburg University, Inst. f. Experimentalphysik, Notke strasse 85, 20603 Hamburg, Germany 11 Inst. High Energy Physics IHEP, FEL Lab. P.O. Box 2732 Beij ing 100080, P.R. China 12 Inst. High Energy Physics, 142284 Protvino, Moscow Regio n, Russia 13 INFN-LNF, via E. Fermi 40, 00044 Frascati, Italy 14 INFN Milano - LASA, via Fratelli Cervi 201, 20090 Segrate ( MI), Italy 15 INFN-Roma2, via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00100 Roma, I taly 16 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Ul. Kawiory 26 a, 30-55 Krak ow, Poland 17 Institute for Nuclear Research of RAS, 117312 Moscow, 60t h October Anniversary prospect 7A, Russia 18 Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, al. Lot nikow, 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland 19 Institut de Physique Nucl´ eaire (CNRS-IN2P3), 91406 Ors ay Cedex, France 20 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Mosc ow Region, Russia 21 Laboratoire de l’Acc´ el´ erateur Lin´ eaire, IN2P3-CNRS , Universit´ e de Paris-Sud, B.P. 34, F-91898 Orsay, France 22 Max-Born-Institute, Max-Born-Str. 2a, 12489 Berlin, Ge rmany 23 Newman Lab, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA 24 RWTH Aachen-Physikzentrum, Phys. Inst. IIIa, Sommerfel dstr. 26-28, 52056 Aachen, Germany 25 UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, 405 Hilgard Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 26 University of Rochester, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, 206 Bausch & Lomb, Rochester NY 14627, USA 27 Yerevan Physics Institute, 2 Alikhanyan Brothers str., 3 75036 Yerevan, Armenia †present address: CERN, CH 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland ‡present address: Procter&Gamble, 53881 Euskirchen, Germa ny §present address: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, SLAC MS 07, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA ∗∗present address: Senderbetriebstechnik Westdeutscher Ru ndfunk, 50600 K¨ oln, Germany ††present address: UCLA Department of Physics & Astronomy, Lo s Angeles, CA 90024, USA ‡‡e-mail: joerg.rossbach@desy.de 0Abstract We present first observation of Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission (SASE) in a free-electron laser (FEL) in the Vac- uum Ultraviolet regime at 109 nm wavelength (11 eV). The observed free-electron laser gain (approx. 3000) and the ra - diation characteristics, such as dependency on bunch charg e, angular distribution, spectral width and intensity fluctua tions all corroborate the present models for SASE FELs. I. INTRODUCTION X-ray lasers are expected to open up new and excit- ing areas of basic and applied research in biology, chem- istry and physics. Due to recent progress in accelera- tor technology the attainment of the long sought-after goal of wide-range tunable laser radiation in the Vacuum- Ultraviolet and X-ray spectral regions is coming close to realization with the construction of free-electron lasers (FEL) [1] based on the principle of Self-Amplified Spon- taneous Emission (SASE) [2,3]. In a SASE FEL lasing occurs in a single pass of a relativistic, high-quality elec - tron bunch through a long undulator magnet structure. The radiation wavelength λphof the first harmonic of FEL radiation is related to the period length λuof a planar undulator by λph=λu 2γ2/parenleftbigg 1 +K2 2/parenrightbigg (1) where γ=E/(mec2) is the relativistic factor of the elec- trons, K=eBuλu/(2πmec2) the undulator parameter andButhe peak magnetic field in the undulator. Equa- tion (1) exhibits two main advantages of the free-electron laser: the free tunability of the wavelength by changing the electron energy and the possibility to achieve very short radiation wavelengths. For most FELs presently in operation [4], the electron beam quality and the undulator length result in a gain of only a few percent per undulator passage, so that an opti- cal cavity resonator and a synchronized multi-bunch elec- tron beam have to be used. At very short wavelengths, normal-incidence mirrors of high reflectivity are unavail- able. Therefore the generation of an electron beam of extremely high quality in terms of emittance, peak cur- rent and energy spread, and a high precision undulator of sufficient length are essential. Provided the spontaneous radiation from the first part of the undulator overlaps the electron beam, the electromagnetic radiation inter- acts with the electron bunch leading to a density mod- ulation (micro-bunching) which enhances the power and coherence of radiation. In this “high gain mode” [5–7], the radiation power P(z) grows exponentially with the distance zalong the undulator ∗Dedicated to Bjørn H. Wiik, 17.2.1937 – 26.2.1999P(z) =APinexp(2z/Lg) (2) where Lgis the field gain length, Pinthe effective input power (see below), and Athe input coupling factor [6,7]. Ais equal to 1/9 in one-dimensional FEL theory with an ideal electron beam. Typical parameters for a SASE FEL operating in the VUV wavelength range are: Pinof about a few Watts and power gain at saturation, G=Psat/Pin, of about 108. Since the desired wavelength is very short, there is no laser tunable over a wide range to provide the in- put power Pin. Instead, the spontaneous undulator ra- diation from the first part of the undulator is used as an input signal to the downstream part. FELs based on this Self-Amplified-Spontaneous-Emission (SASE) prin- ciple are presently considered the most attractive can- didates for delivering extremely brilliant, coherent ligh t with wavelength in the ˚Angstr¨ om regime [8–11]. Com- pared to state-of-the-art synchrotron radiation sources, one expects full transverse coherence, up to 4-6 orders of magnitude larger average brilliance, and up to 8-10 or- ders of magnitude larger peak brilliance at pulse lengths of about 200 fs FWHM. Recently there have been impor- tant advances in demonstrating a high-gain SASE FEL at 12µm wavelength [12] and at 530 nm wavelength [13]. II. EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP The experimental results presented in this paper have been achieved at the TESLA Test Facility (TTF) Free-Electron Laser [14] at the Deutsches Elektronen- Synchrotron DESY. The TESLA (TeV-Energy Supercon- ducting Linear Accelerator) collaboration consists of 39 institutes from 9 countries and aims at the construction of a 500 GeV (center-of-mass) e+/e−linear collider with an integrated X-ray laser facility [10]. Major hardware contributions to TTF have come from Germany, France, Italy, and the USA. The goal of the TTF FEL is to demonstrate SASE FEL emission in the VUV and, in a second phase, to build a soft X-ray user facility [15,16]. TABLE I. Main parameters of the TESLA Test Facility for FEL experiments (TTF FEL, phase 1) Parameter Measured value beam energy 233 ±5 MeV rms energy spread 0 .3±0.2 MeV rms transverse beam size 100 ±30µm normalized emittance, εn 6±3πmrad mm electron bunch charge 1 nC peak electron current 400 ±200 A bunch spacing 1 µs repetition rate 1 Hz undulator period, λu 27.3 mm undulator peak field 0.46 T effective undulator length 13.5 m radiation wavelength, λph 109 nm FEL gain 3×103 FEL radiation pulse length 0.3-1 ps 1bunch compressorundulator233 MeV 16 MeV 4 MeV 120 MeV lasersuperconducting accelerating cavitiespre- acceleratorlaser driven electron gunphoton beam diagnostics e - beam diagnostics-e - beam diagnostics-TTF FEL 1 FIG. 1. Schematic layout of phase 1 of the SASE FEL at the TESLA Test Facility at DESY, Hamburg. The linac contains two 12.2 m long cryogenic modules each equipped with eight 9-cell superconducting accelerating cavities [ 20]. The total length is 100 m. The layout is shown in Fig. 1. The main parameters for FEL operation are compiled in Table I. The injector is based on a laser-driven 11 2-cell rf gun electron source op- erating at 1.3 GHz [17]. It uses a Cs 2Te cathode [18] and can generate bunch charges more than 10 nC at 1 MHz repetition rate. A loading system allows mounting and changing of cathodes while maintaining ultra-high vac- uum conditions [18]. The cathode is illuminated by a train of UV laser pulses generated in a mode-locked solid- state laser system [19] synchronized with the rf. An en- ergy of up to 50 µJ with a pulse-to-pulse variation of 2% (rms) is achieved. The UV pulse length measured with a streak camera is σt= 7.1±0.6 ps . The rf gun is operated with a peak electric field of 37 MV/m on the photocathode. The rf pulse length was limited to 100 µs and the repetition rate to 1 Hz for machine protection reasons. The gun section is followed by a 9-cell super- conducting cavity, boosting the energy to 16 MeV. The superconducting accelerator structure has been described elsewhere [20]. The undulator is a fixed 12 mm gap permanent magnet device using a combined function magnet design [21] with a period length of λu= 27.3 mm and a peak field of Bu= 0.46 T, resulting in an undulator parameter of K= 1.17. Integrated quadrupole structures produce a gradient of 12 T/m superimposed on the periodic undulator field in order to focus the electron beam along the undulator. The undulator system is subdivided into three segments, each 4.5 m long and containing 10 quadrupole sections to build up 5 full focusing-defocusing (FODO) cells. The FODO lattice periodicity runs smoothly from segment to segment. There is a spacing of 0.3 m between adjacent segments for diagnostics. The total length of the system is 14.1 m. The vacuum chamber incorporates 10 beam position monitors and 10 orbit correction magnets per segment, one for each quadrupole [22,23]. For optimum overlap between the electron light beams, high precision on the magnetic fields and mechanical alignment are required. The undulator field was adjusted such that the expected rms deviations of the electron or- bit should be smaller than 10 µm at 300 MeV [24]. The beam orbit straightness in the undulator is determined by the alignment precision of the superimposed permanent- magnet quadrupole fields which is better than 50 µm in both vertical and horizontal direction. The relative align -ment of the three segments is accomplished with a laser interferometer to better than 30 µm [25]. Different techniques have been used to measure the emittance of the electron beam [26]: Magnet optics scan- ning (“quadrupole scans”), tomographic reconstruction of the phase space including space charge effects, and the slit system method. All methods use optical transi- tion radiation emitted from aluminum foils to measure the bunch profiles and yield values for the normalized emittance of (4 ±1)πmrad mm for a bunch charge of 1 nC at the exit of the injector. The emittance in the un- dulator, as determined from quadrupole scans and from a system of wire scanners was typically between 6 and 10πmrad mm (in both horizontal and vertical phase space). It should be noted that the measurement tech- niques applied determine the emittance integrated over the entire bunch length. However, for FEL physics, the emittance of bunch slices much shorter than the bunch length is the relevant parameter. It is likely that, due to spurious dispersion and wakefields, the bunch axis is tilted about a transverse axis such that the projected emittance is larger than the emittance of any slice. Based on these considerations we estimate the normalized slice emittance in the undulator at (6 ±3)πmrad mm. A bunch compressor is inserted between the two accel- erating modules, in order to increase the peak current of the bunch up to 500 A, corresponding to 0.25 mm bunch length (rms) for a 1 nC bunch with Gaussian density pro- file. Experimentally, it is routinely verified that a large fraction of the bunch charge is compressed to a length below 0.4 mm (rms) [27]. There are indications that the core is compressed even further. We estimate the peak current for the FEL experiment at (400 ±200) A. Coher- ent synchrotron radiation in the magnetic bunch com- pressor may affect the emittance and the energy spread at such short bunch lengths [28]. III. FEL MEASUREMENTS A strong evidence for the FEL process is a large in- crease in the on-axis radiation intensity if the electron beam is injected such that it overlaps with the radia- tion during the entire passage through the undulator. Fig. 2 shows the intensity passing a 0.5 mm iris, lo- cated on axis 12 m downstream of the undulator, as a function of the horizontal beam position at the undula- tor entrance. The observed intensity inside a window of ±200µm around the optimum beam position is a factor of more than 100 higher than the intensity of spontaneous radiation. A PtSi photodiode was used integrating over all wavelengths. Note that the vacuum chamber diam- eter in the undulator (9.5 mm) is much larger than the beam diameter (300 µm). SASE gain is expected to depend on the bunch charge in an extremely nonlinear way. Fig. 3 shows the mea- sured intensity on axis as a function of bunch charge Q, 2while the beam orbit is kept constant for optimum gain. The solid line indicates the intensity of the spontaneous undulator radiation multiplied by a factor of 100. The strongly nonlinear increase of the intensity as a function of bunch charge is a definite proof of FEL action. The gain does not further increase if the bunch charge exceeds some 0.6 nC. This needs further study, but it is known that the beam emittance becomes larger for increasing Q thus reducing the FEL gain. FIG. 2. Sensitivity of radiation power to horizontal elec- tron beam position at the undulator entrance. The dots rep- resent mean values of the radiation intensity for each beam position. The horizontal error bars denote the rms beam posi - tion instability while the vertical error bars indicate the stan- dard deviation of intensity fluctuations, which are due to th e statistical charcter of the SASE process, see. Eq. (3)FIG. 3. SASE intensity versus bunch charge. The straight line is the spontaneous intensity multiplied by a factor of 1 00. To guide the eye, mean values of the radiation intensity are shown for some bunch charges (dots). For vertical error bars , see Fig. 2 1051061071081091101111120200400600800100012001400 Simulations SASEIntensity [a.u.] λ λ / nm FIG. 4. Wavelength spectrum of the central radiation cone (collimation angle ±0.2 mrad), taken at maximum FEL gain. The dotted line is the result of numerical simulation. The bunch charge is 1 nC. -10 -5 0 5 100.00.20.40.60.81.0 SimulationsSpontaneous emission x30SASEIntensity [a.u.] Position / mm FIG. 5. Horizontal intensity profile of SASE FEL and spontaneous undulator radiation ( x30), measured with a pho- todiode behind a 0.5 mm aperture in a distance of 12 m from the end of the undulator. The dotted line is the result of numerical simulation. The wavelength spectrum of the radiation (taken on axis at maximum FEL gain) is presented in Fig. 4. The central wavelength of 108.5 nm is consistent with the measured beam energy of (233 ±5) MeV and the known undulator parameter K= 1.17, see Eq. (1). The inten- sity gain determined with the CCD camera of the spec- trometer is in agreement with the photodiode result. A characteristic feature of SASE FELs is the concen- tration of radiation power into a cone much narrower than that of wavelength integrated undulator radiation, 3whose opening angle is in the order of 1 /γ. Measure- ments done by moving the 0.5 mm iris horizontally to- gether with the photodiode confirm this expectation, see Fig. 5. The spontaneous intensity is amplified by a factor of 30 to be visible on this scale. In order to study which section of the undulator con- tributes most to the FEL gain, we applied closed orbit beam bumps to different sections of the undulator, thus disturbing the gain process at various locations along the undulator. It was seen that practically the entire undu- lator contributes, but with some variation in local gain. Some improvement in the over-all gain should be possible by optimizing the settings of the 30 orbit correction coils which have not been touched so far. To determine the absolute FEL intensity, the photo- diode is firstly calibrated using the known intensity of undulator radiation. For the iris diameter of 3 mm used for spontaneous emission and averaging the solid angle Ω over the source positions inside the undulator, we get Ω = 2 ×10−8. About 70 pJ is accepted within the iris at the first harmonic of the spontaneous undulator radi- ation per 1 nC bunch charge. The SASE FEL signal was measured using an iris diameter of 0.5 mm, the signal was larger by a factor of about 5. Hence, the energy flux is 2 nJ/mm2at the location of the detector and the on-axis flux per unit solid angle is about 0.3 J/sr (assuming a source position at the end of the undulator). This value was used as input for the numerical simulation of the SASE FEL performed with the code FAST [29]. The lon- gitudinal profile of the bunch current was assumed to be Gaussian with an rms length of 0.25 mm. The transverse distribution of the beam current density was also taken to be Gaussian. Calculations have been performed for a Gaussian energy spread of 0.1%. According to numerical simulation one of the most critical parameters for FEL operation is the normalized emittance εnthat was varied in the simulations between 5 and 10 πmrad mm. A first conclusion from our calculations is that the TTF FEL operates in the high-gain linear regime where the power grows exponentially along the undulator. The contribu- tion of the fundamental transverse mode TEM 00to the total power seems to dominate, so that Eq. (2) applies. Our calculations show that the length at which a level of energy flux of 0.3 J/sr is obtained strongly depends on emittance, but the number of gain lengths is roughly the same in all cases and is about 5. Figs. 4 and 5 include typical theoretical spectral and angular distributions as calculated by our numerical simulation. In both cases ex- perimental curves are wider than the simulation results. A possible source of the widening is energy and orbit jit- ter, since the experimental curves are results of averaging over many bunches. The FEL gain is defined as the ratio of output to input power Pout/Pin, see Eq. (2). It is a characteristic of the FEL amplifier and should depend only on the parameters of the electron beam and the undulator but not on the type of input signal. For a FEL amplifier seeded by an external laser the input power is well defined. For anFEL amplifier starting from noise (i.e. a SASE FEL) the effective power of shot noise can be defined as the power of optimally focused seeding radiation yielding the same output power. The gain Gis then simply G= Aexp(2z/Lg), see Eq. (2). With an input coupling factor A≈0.1, the FEL gain can be estimated at G≈3·103. The uncertainty is estimated at a factor of 3 (i.e. 103< G <104) and is mainly due to the imprecise knowledge of the longitudinal beam profile. It is essential to realize that the fluctuations seen in Figs. 2 and 3 are not primarily due to unstable operation of the accelerator but are inherent to the SASE process. Shot noise in the electron beam causes fluctuations of the beam density, which are random in time and space [30]. As a result, the radiation produced by such a beam has random amplitudes and phases in time and space and can be described in terms of statistical optics. In the linear regime of a SASE FEL, the radiation pulse energy measured in a narrow central cone (opening angle ±20µrad in our case) at maximum gain is expected to fluctuate according to a gamma distribution p(E) [31], p(E) =MM Γ(M)/parenleftbiggE /angbracketleftE/angbracketright/parenrightbiggM−11 /angbracketleftE/angbracketrightexp/parenleftbigg −ME /angbracketleftE/angbracketright/parenrightbigg (3) where /angbracketleftE/angbracketrightis the mean energy, Γ( M) is the gamma func- tion with argument M, and M−1=/angbracketleft(E− /angbracketleftE/angbracketright)2/angbracketright//angbracketleftE/angbracketright2 is the normalized variance of E. The parameter Mcor- responds to the number of longitudinal optical modes. Note that the same kind of statistics applies for com- pletely chaotic polarized light, in particular for sponta- neous undulator radiation. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.00.51.01.5 λ λ = 109 nm M = 14.4 σ σ = 26%Probability, p(E/<E>) E/<E> FIG. 6. Probability distribution of SASE intensity. The rms fluctuation yields a number of longitudinal modes M= 14. The solid curve is the gamma distribution for M= 14.4. The bunch charge is 1 nC. For these statistical measurements the signals from 3000 radiation pulses have been recorded, with the small iris (0.5 mm diameter) in front of the photo diode to guarantee that transversely coherent radiation pulses are selected. As one can see from Fig. 6, the distribution of the energy in the radiation pulses is quite close to the 4gamma distribution. The relative rms fluctuations are about 26% corresponding to M= 14.4. One should take into account that these fluctuations arise not only from the shot noise in the electron beam, but the pulse-to- pulse variations of the beam parameters can also con- tribute to the fluctuations. Thus, the value M≈14 can be considered as a lower limit for the number of longitu- dinal modes in the radiation pulse. Using the width of radiation spectrum we calculate the coherence time [31] and find that the part of the electron bunch contribut- ing to the SASE process is at least 100 µm long. ¿From the quality of the agreement with the gamma distribu- tion we can also conclude that the statistical properties of the radiation are described with Gaussian statistics. In particular, this means that there are no FEL saturation effects. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Fundamental work on high accelerating gradients in su- perconducting cavities at Wuppertal University was es- sential for the successful construction of the first TTF accelerating modules. We are grateful for the invaluable support by the technical staff of the participating groups. Support by the Moscow Physical Engineering Institute and by the Institute for Nuclear Studies, Swierk, Poland, is gratefully acknowledged. [1] J.M.J. Madey, J. Appl. Phys. 42,1906 (1971). [2] A.M. Kondratenko, E.L. Saldin, Part. Accelerators 10, 207 (1980) [3] R. Bonifacio, C. Pellegrini, L.M. Narducci, Opt. Com- mun.50,373 (1984) [4] W.B. Colson, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A429, 37-40 (1999). [5] K.J. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57,1871 (1986) [6] S. Krinsky, L.H. Yu, Phys. Rev. A35, 3406 (1987) [7] E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov, “The Physics of Free Electron Lasers”, Springer (1999) and references therein [8] H. Winick, et al., Proc. PAC Washington and SLAC- PUB-6185, (1993) [9] R. Brinkmann, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 393, 86-92 (1997) [10] R. Brinkmann, G. Materlik, J. Rossbach, A. Wagner (eds.), DESY 1997-048 and ECFA 1997-182 (1997) [11] H.-D. Nuhn, J. Rossbach, Synchrotron Radiation News 13, No. 1, 18 - 32 (2000) [12] M. Hogan, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81,4867 (1998) [13] S. Milton, et al., “Observation of Self-Amplified Spon- taneous Emission and Exponential Growth at 530 nm”, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. (2000) [14] W. Brefeld, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A393, 119-124 (1997)[15] T. ˚Aberg, et al., A VUV FEL at the TESLA Test Fa- cility at DESY, Conceptual Design Report, DESY Print TESLA-FEL 95-03 (1995) [16] J. Rossbach, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 375, 269 (1996) [17] J.-P. Carneiro, et al., Proc. 1999 Part. Acc. Conf., New York, 2027-2029 (1999) [18] P. Michelato, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A445, 422 (2000) [19] I. Will, S. Schreiber, A. Liero, W. Sandner, Nucl. Instr . and Meth. A445, 427 (2000) [20] H. Weise, Proc. 1998 Linac Conf. Chicago, 674-678 (1998) [21] Y.M. Nikitina, J. Pfl¨ uger, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A375, 325 (1996) [22] U. Hahn, J. Pfl¨ uger, G. Schmidt, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A429, 276 (1999) [23] U. Hahn, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A445, 442 (2000) [24] J. Pfl¨ uger, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A445, 366 (2000) [25] J. Pfl¨ uger, H. Lu, T. Teichmann, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A429 386 (1999) [26] H. Edwards, et al., Proc. 1999 FEL Conf., Hamburg [27] M. Geitz, G. Schmidt, P. Schm¨ user, G.V. Walter, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A445, 343 (2000) [28] M. Dohlus, A. Kabel, T. Limberg, Proc. 1999 Part. Acc. Conf., New York, 1650-1652 (1999) [29] E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov, Nucl. In - str. and Meth. A 429, 233 (1999) [30] R. Bonifacio, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73,70 (1994) [31] E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov, Opt. Commun. 148383 (1998) 5

arXiv:physics/0006011v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 7 Jun 2000Phase Mixing of Nonlinear Plasma Oscillations in an Arbitra ry Mass Ratio Cold Plasma Sudip Sen Gupta and Predhiman K. Kaw Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar 382 428, I ndia. (February 2, 2008) Abstract Nonlinear plasma oscillations in an arbitrary mass ratio co ld plasma have been studied using 1-D particle-in-cell simulation. In con trast to earlier work for infinitely massive ion plasmas it has been found that the o scillations phase mix away at any amplitude and that the rate at which phase mixi ng occurs, depends on the mass ratio ( ∆ = m−/m+) and the amplitude. A perturba- tion theoretic calculation carried upto third order predic ts that the normalized phase mixing time ωp−tmixdepends on the amplitude Aand the mass ratio ∆ as∼[(A2/24)(∆ /√ 1 + ∆)]−1/3. We have confirmed this scaling in our simu- lations and conclude that stable non-linear oscillations w hich never phase mix, exist only for the ideal case with ∆ = 0 .0 and A <0.5. These cold plasma results may have direct relevance to recent experiments on s uperintense laser beam plasma interactions with applications to particle acc eleration, fast ign- itor concept etc. PACS number(s): 52.35.Mw, 52.65.Rr Typeset using REVT EX 1The physics of the damping of nonlinear cold plasma oscillat ions is a topic of considerable fundamental interest since it is the simplest nonlinear col lective irreversible phenomenon characterising the plasma state. It also has wide applicati ons to a number of problems of current interest such as particle acceleration by wakefie lds and beat waves created by intense lasers or particle beams, the fast ignitor concept i n inertial fusion where relativisti- cally intense coupled electromagnetic - plasma waves modes propagate deep into overdense plasmas to create a ’hot spark’ and a number of other astrophy sical / laboratory / device based plasma experiments where intense plasma oscillation s are generated. The conventional thinking about the physics of this interaction is well illus trated by the exact solution for nonlinear one - dimensional cold plasma fluid equations with infinitely massive ions. These exact solutions may be obtained by transforming to Lagrangi an coordinates as shown in [1–3] or using stream functions [4]. The exact solution show s that coherent oscillations at the plasma frequency ωpare maintained indefinitely over the region of initial excit ation, provided the normalized amplitude of the initial density pe rturbation A(≡δn n) is kept be- low 0.5. For A >0.5, one expects and observes wave breaking and fine scale mixin g of various parts of the oscillation [1]. Mathematically, the e lectron number density blows up atA= 0.5; this is because the Jacobian of transformation from Euler ian to Lagrangian coordinates goes to zero as A→0.5 and the transformation is no longer unique. Physically, this is equivalent to crossing of electron trajectories whi ch leads to multistream motions and wave breaking as discussed in [1]. Studies of wave breaking a nd phase mixing damping are based on numerical simulations. The above description is adequate when the background posit ive species are infinitely massive (m− m+≡∆→0) and are uniformly distributed. If the background is inhom ogeneous, then as was shown by Dawson [1], cold plasma oscillations pha se mix away in a time scale t∼π 2(dωp/dx)X, at arbitrarily low amplitudes. For a sinusoidal distribut ion of background species, such a phenomenon in the form of mode coupling of a lo ng wavelength mode to short wavelength modes was observed by Kaw et. al. [5]. They f ound that, the time scale in 2which energy goes from long wavelength mode to short wavelen gth mode is t∼2 ǫωp0, where ’ǫ’ is the amplitude of the background inhomogeneity. The exac t solution for the cold plasma oscillations in a fixed sinusoidal background was given by In feld et. al. [6] who described phase mixing in terms of electron density burst. In this paper we show that the phenomenon of phase mixing will also occur in a homo- geneous plasma at arbitrarily low amplitudes, provided the background positive species are allowed to move (∆ /ne}ationslash= 0). This is because the background species respond to ponde romo- tive forces either directly or through low frequency self-c onsistent fields and thereby acquire inhomogenities in space. Such an effect has been observed in e lectron positron plasmas (∆ = 1) by Stewart [7]. In plasmas with finite temperature, it i s well known that plasma waves dig cavities by ponderomotive forces and get trapped i n them; this is the physics of strong turbulence of Langmuir waves as elucidated by Zakhar ov [8] and leads to envelope soliton formation in one - dimension and collapse phenomeno n in 2-D and 3-D. In a cold plasma, stationary states cannot form even in 1-D because th ere is no thermal pressure effect to counterbalance the ponderomotive forces. The result is t hat the density cavities being dug by plasma oscillations have an amplitude which increase s secularly in time . Similarly, the response of plasma oscillations to the presence of densi ty cavities is also different from that of Zakharov problem. In the Zakharov problem, the therm ally dispersive plasma waves get trapped in density cavities forming localized wavepack ets. Here, the inhomogeneity of the cold plasma ( due to the self - consistently generated per turbation ) causes different parts of the plasma oscillation to oscillate at different fre quencies [1] [5] [6] resulting in in- tense phase mixing of plasma oscillations. Thus we physical ly expect that if the background species is allowed to move and get redistributed into inhomo geneous clumps of density, the phase mixing damping of cold plasma oscillations should com e in at any amplitude and is not restricted to waves with A >0.5. It may be emphasised here that for many applications involving interaction of superintense laser beams with pla smas ( such as particle accleration by wake fields, penetration into overdense plasmas etc. ) the cold plasma limit considered by us is more relevant than the Zakharov description, becaus e typically the plasma wave 3intensities are such that |E|2/4πnT≫1. In this paper we carry out particle simulations for elucidat ing the physics of phase mixing damping of nonlinear cold plasma oscillations in an arbitra ry mass ratio plasma (∆ arbi- trary). We also present a perturbation - theoretic analysis to give a quantitative estimate of the phase mixing time for moderate amplitude oscillations a nd compare it with simulation. We start with the cold plasma equations viz.the continuity equations and the equations of motion for the two species and the Poisson equation. We int roduce new variables V, v, δn d andδnsdefined as V=v++v−,v=v+−v−,δnd=δn+−δn−=n+−n−andδns= δn++δn−=n++n−−2 to write the cold plasma equations in the form ∂tδnd+∂x[v+V δn d+vδns 2] = 0 (1) ∂tδns+∂x[V+V δn s+vδnd 2] = 0 (2) ∂tV+∂x(V2+v2 4) =−(1−∆)E (3) ∂tv+∂x(V v 2) = (1 + ∆) E (4) ∂xE=δnd (5) Note that we have used the normalizations: n±→n±/n0,x→kx,t→ωp−t,v±→ v±/ωp−k−1,E→E/(4πn0ek−1), with ω2 p−= 4πn0e2/m−and ∆ = m−/m+. Using n−(x,0) = 1 + δcoskx,n+(x,0) = 1 and v±(x,0) = 0, as initial conditions, the solutions of the linearised equations are δn(1) d=Acoskxcosωpt (6) E(1)=A ksinkxcosωpt (7) δn(1) s=1−∆ 1 + ∆Acoskx(1−cosωpt)−Acoskx (8) V(1)=−1−∆ kωpAsinkxsinωpt (9) v(1)=1 + ∆ kωpAsinkxsinωpt (10) where A=−δandω2 p= 1 + ∆. At this level of approximation, the solutions show 4coherent oscillations at the plasma frequency ωp. Both the species oscillate with the same frequency which is independent of position. In the 2nd order, the solutions are expressed as: δn(2) d=−A2cos 2kx[1−∆ 1 + ∆(1 2+1 4ωptsinωpt+1 2cos 2ωpt−cosωpt)−1 4ωptsinωpt] (11) δE(2)=−A2 2ksin 2kx[1−∆ 1 + ∆(1 2+1 4ωptsinωpt+1 2cos 2ωpt−cosωpt)−1 4ωptsinωpt] (12) δn(2) s=A2 2cos 2kx[∆ 1 + ∆t2−∆(1−∆) (1 + ∆)2ωptsinωpt−3 8(1−cos 2ωpt)− (13) (1−∆ 1 + ∆)2(2 cos ωpt−5 8cos 2ωpt−11 8)] V(2)=−A2 2ksin 2kx[∆ 1 + ∆t+ωp 2(1−∆ 1 + ∆)2(1−3∆ 2(1−∆)ωptcosωpt+ (14) 7−5∆ 2(1−∆)sinωpt−5 4sin 2ωpt)−1 8ωpsin 2ωpt] v(2)=−A2ωp 8ksin 2kx[sinωpt−ωptcosωpt−1−∆ 1 + ∆(2 sin 2 ωpt−3 sinωpt−ωptcosωpt)] (15) The 2nd order solutions clearly exhibit generation of 2nd ha rmonic in space and time as well as bunching of plasma particles in space. Both of thes e features are also evident in the solution of Kaw et. al. [5] and Infeld et. al. [6]; but in co ntrast to their work, where the background ion density was kept fixed in time, here the den sity of the plasma particles self - consistently changes with time as ∼t2, as seen in the expression for δn(2) s. Because of variation of plasma density with time, the phase mixing of an initial coherent oscillation happens much faster in this case. To make an estimate of the ph ase mixing time, consider the charge density equation ( δndin this case ). The equation for δndcorrect upto third order stands as ∂ttδnd+ω2 p[1 +1 2(δn(1) s+δn(2) s)]δnd≈0 (16) In the above equation, if we neglect the 2nd order term, then w e essentially get the same phase mixing time as in Ref. [5] modified by a factor which depe nds on ∆. Now taking only 5the leading order secular terms from the expressions of δn(1) sandδn(2) s( there are no secular terms in δn(1) s) we get ∂ttδnd+ω2 p[1 +A2t2∆ 4ω2pcos 2kx]δnd≈0 (17) Using the initial conditions δnd=Acoskxand∂tδnd= 0 the WKB solution of the above equation is δnd≈Acoskxn=∞/summationdisplay n=−∞cos(ωpt+nπ 2−2nkx)Jn(A2t3∆ 24√ 1 + ∆) (18) The above expression clearly shows that the energy which was initially in the primary wave at mode kgoes into higher and higher harmonics as time progresses. Th is can be interpreted as damping of the primary wave due to mode coupli ng to higher and higher modes. Microscopically, as the plasma particles oscillate at the local plasma frequency, they gradually go out of phase and eventually the initial coheren ce is lost. Because of generation of higher and higher harmonics with time, the charge density becomes more and more spiky and as a result the electric field gradients become more and mo re steep. This does not go on indefinitely. In reality, the density peaks get limited by thermal effects with the Landau damping of high kmodes by resonant particles coming into picture. This proce ss takes energy from the high kmodes and puts it on the particles, thereby raising their tem perature, which in turn limits the density peaks by exerting a pressure gradient. The time scale in which the initial coherence is lost ( or the phase mixing time ) can be seen from equation (18) as ωp−tmixscale as ∼[A2∆/(24√ 1 + ∆)]−1/3. It shows that only for the ideal case ∆ = 0 .0 (infinitely massive ions), phase mixing time is infinity, i. e. the initial coherence is maintained indefinitely [2,3]. For an actual electron - ion p lasma, ∆ although small, is finite and hence plasma oscillations in it phase mix away at arbitra rily small amplitudes and in a time scale dictated by the amplitude of the initial perturba tion. Now we present results from a 1-D particle-in-cell simulati on which confirms our scal- ing of phase mixing time. For numerical simulation, we have u sed a 1-dimensional model with periodic boundary conditions and have followed 5120 el ectrons and as many positively 6charged particles ( the plasma taken as a whole is neutral ) in their own self - consistent fields. The particles are initially at rest and the system is s et into motion by giving a density perturbation of the form n−= 1+ δcoskxto the electrons. In the simulation, we follow the time development of various modes of charge density ( δnd). To compare with our theoretical model, we rewrite equation (18) as δnd=A 2n=∞/summationdisplay n=−∞Jn[α(t)][cos( ωpt+nπ 2){cos(2n+ 1)kx+ cos(2 n−1)kx}+ (19) sin(ωpt+nπ 2){sin(2n+ 1)kx+ sin(2 n−1)kx}] where α(t) =A2t3 24∆√1+∆. The amplitude of the first fourier mode can be seen from the above equation as |δnd|n=1=A 2[J2 0(α(t)) +J2 1(α(t))]1 2 (20) It is clear from equation (19), that upto the order of approxi mation considered, there are no even number modes in the system. Fig. (1) show temporal variation of |δnd|n=1for ∆ = 1 .0 and A= 0.05. The dotted curve is the simulation result and the solid li ne shows our expression (20) for the envelope of the oscillations. It is clear from the figure that our approximate expression (20) captures the early evolution o f the plasma quite well. Fig. (2) shows the variation of τmix=ωptmixwith ∆ for a fixed A= 0.1 (curve(1)) and with Afor a fixed ∆ = 0 .01 (curve(2)). These curves clearly confirm our formula for p hase mixing time. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that nonlinear plasma o scillations in a cold ho- mogeneous plasma, phase mix away at arbitrarily low amplitu des. This is because during the course of motion the plasma particles respond to pondero motive forces, acquiring in- homogeneity and thereby making the plasma frequency a funct ion of space. As a result, electrons at different locations oscillate with different ( l ocal ) plasma frequencies and the imposed plasma wave losses coherence. The formation of dens ity clumps can also be seen from the Zakharov equations [8] for a warm electron - ion plas ma. According to Zakharov, the slow variation ( in the ion time scale ) of the background d ensity in the presence of a high frequency oscillation is governed by ∂ttδns−T∂xxδns=∂xx|E|2. In the limit when 7the thermal term balances the ponderomotive force term ( i.e .δns n0≈ −|E|2 T), we get caviton solutions in 1-D which are unstable to transverse perturbat ions. In the other limit, when |E|2 T≫1, it is the ∂ttδnsterm which dominates, and the Zakharov equation shows densi ty rising as ∼t2. This is the same scaling as obtained by us using a perturbati ve approach. The density inhomogenities thus created lead to phase mixing an d collapse of cavitons. From this we infer that a cold 1-D plasma exhibits a ’Langmuir coll apse’ phenomenon similar to what is seen in a warm plasma in 2 or 3 dimensions. The time scal e of collapse is of the order∼(A2 24∆√1+∆)−1 3plasma periods. Recent experiments on plasma acceleration by laser wakefields have shown [9] that wave breaking of excited plasm a oscillations plays a major role in the final acceleration process ; similar physics is li kely to be important in the fast ignitor concept of laser fusion. We expect the processes dis cussed in the present paper to play some role in such experiments. It should be noted that th e simulation results presented in this letter are non - relativistic. For many experimental situations the jitter velocity of electrons is relativistic and we expect the mass ratio ∆ to be replaced by ∆ eff≈meff/mi where meff/mi≫1. Under these conditions, the phase mixing effects consider ed by us should become more important. Such investigations are in pr ogress and will be presented elsewhere. 8REFERENCES [1] J. M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. 113, 383 (1959). [2] M. V. Konyukov, Soviet Phys. JETP 37, 570 (1960). [3] R. C. Davidson, Methods in Nonlinear Plasma Physics (Academic, New York, 1972). [4] G. Kalman, Ann. Phys. 10, 29 (1960). [5] P. K. Kaw, A. T. Lin and J. M. Dawson, Phys. of fluids 16, 1967 (1973). [6] E. Infeld, G. Rowlands and S. Torv´ en, Phys. Rev. Letts. 62, 2269 (1989). [7] G. A. Stewart, Jnl. Plasma phys. 50, 521 (1993). [8] V. E. Zakharov, Sov. Phys. JETP 35, 908 (1972). [9] D. Gordon et. al., Phys. Rev. Letts. 80, 2133 (1998). 9Figure Captions Fig. 1: |δnd|n=1vs.t/TPfor ∆ = 1 .0 and A= 0.05 Fig. 2: τmixvs. ∆ and A 10/0 /0/./0/2 /0/./0/4 /0/./0/6 /0/./0/8 /0/./1 /0/./1/2 /0/./1/4 /0/./1/6/0 /1/0 /2/0 /3/0 /4/0 /5/0 j / nd jn /=/1t/=TpFig/. /1/2/0 /4/0 /6/0 /8/0 /1/0/0 /1/2/0 /1/4/0 /1/6/0/0/./0/0/0/1 /0/./0/0/1 /0/./0/1 /0/./1 /1 /mix/
/; A /(/1/)/(/2/) //// cccFig/. /2

arXiv:physics/0006012v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 7 Jun 2000A new approach to study energy transfer in magnetohydrodyna mic turbulence Gaurav Dar∗and Mahendra K. Verma Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India V. Eswaran Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India The unit of nonlinear interaction in Navier-Stokes and the M agnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equa- tions is a wavenumber triad ( k,p,q ) satisfying k+p+q=0. The expression for the combined energy transfer from two of these wavenumbers to the third wa venumber is known. In this paper we introduce the idea of an effective energy transfer between a p air of modes through the mediation of the third mode and then find an expression for it. In fluid turbu lence, energy transfer takes place between a pair of velocity modes, whereas in MHD turbulence e nergy transfer takes places between (1) a pair of velocity modes, (2) a pair of magnetic modes, and (3) between a velocity and a magnetic mode in a triad. In this paper we have obtained the expression for each of these transfers. We also show how the effective mode-to-mode energy transfer rate can be utilised to study energy cascades and shell-to-shell energy transfer rates. ∗e-mail: gdar@iitk.ac.in 1I. INTRODUCTION In fluid and MHD turbulence, eddies of various sizes interact amongst themselves; energy is exchanged among them in this process. These interactions arise due to the non linearity present in these systems. The fundamental interactions involve wavenumber triads ( k,p,q) with k+p+q=0. Thecombined energy transfer computation to a mode from the other two modes of a triad has ge nerally been considered to be fundamental. This formalism has played an i mportant role in furthering our understanding of locality in fluid turbulence [1–4], and also in analysing subgrid scal e eddy viscosity [5,6]. Energy interactions are considered to be local if the triads with k∼p∼qcontribute most to the energy transfer to the wavenumber k. Numerical simulations of Domaradzki and Rogallo [2,1] showed that the contribution of the nonlocal triads ( k∼p>>q ) to the interactions is not small, but in such triads the dominant ex change of energy occurs between wavenumbers of similar magnitudes, i.e., between kandp. Domaradzki et al. [6] computed the sub-grid scale viscosity by summing up the energy lost by a wavenumber k <k c(cut off wavenumber) by triad interactions with atleast one w avenumber larger thankc. Batchelor [7] first suggested a formula for the energy trans fer in fluid turbulence between two regions in Fourier space, and Domaradzki and Rogallo [1] calculated sh ell-to-shell energy transfer rates. Taking energy transfe r between shells as an example, we will show in Section III, tha t these formalisms have certain limitations. In this paper we present a scheme to calculate the energy tran sfer rates between two modes in a triad interaction. Using our scheme we can calculate the energy transfer rates b etween two shells, cascade rates, and also study locality of energy transfer. The formulae for the combined energy trans fer rate were used to study energy transfer rates in MHD turbulence [8–12]. Ishizawa and Hattori [12] numerically c omputed the kinetic energy flux to the velocity modes outside the sphere and the magnetic energy fluxes to the magne tic modes outside the sphere. They also computed the kinetic energy fluxes due to transfer of energy to all magn etic modes and a similar magnetic energy flux due to transfer of energy to all velocity modes [12]. Pouquet et al. [9], Pouquet [10], and Ishizawa and Hattori [11] used the combined energy transfer formalism in an Eddy damped qua si-normal Markovian (EDQNM) closure calculation to study non-local energy transfer. However, several energ y transfers cannot be calculated using these formalisms. Our formalism of “mode-to-mode” transfer enables us to calc ulate all these energy transfer rates between the spheres and the shells. This paper is organized into the following sections. In Sect ion II we will state the known results regarding the 2combined energy transfer between velocity modes of a triad. In Section III we will present a discussion on the formulae which are used for studying energy transfer between shells i n fluid turbulence. In Section IV we will formulate a way of studying energy transfer between a pair of modes within a t riad, with the third mode of the triad meditating the transfer. This new method is used to re-define shell-to-s hell transfer in Section V. The known results of energy transfer in a MHD triad are discussed in Section VI and the “mo de-to-mode” transfers in MHD in Section VII. The results of Section VII are used in Section VIII to define shell -to-shell transfer rates and the energy cascade rates in MHD turbulence. The conclusions of this paper follows in Sec tion IX. II. ENERGY TRANSFER IN A TRIAD: KNOWN RESULTS The Navier Stokes equation in real space are written as ∂u ∂t+ (u.∇)u=−∇p+ν∇2u, (1) where uis the velocity field, and νis the fluid kinematic viscosity. In Fourier space, the kinet ic energy equations for a Fourier mode is ∂Eu(k) ∂t+ 2νk2Eu(k) =/summationdisplay k+p+q=01 2Suu(k|p,q), (2) whereEu(k)≡ |u(k)|2/2 is the kinetic energy in Fourier space for mode k. The nonlinear term Suu(k|p,q) is Suu(k|p,q)≡ −Re(i[k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)] +i[k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]) (3) This term represents the combined transfer of kinetic energ y from mode pandqto mode k[13]. Note that the wavenumber triad k,p, andqshould satisfy the condition k+p+q= 0. This nonlinear term satisfies the following conservation property Suu(k|p,q) +Suu(p|k,q) +Suu(q|k,p) = 0. (4) While the quantity Suu(k|p,q) represents the nonlinear energy transfer from the two modes pandqto mode k, it would be useful to know the exact energy transfer between any two modes , say from ptok. In Section IV we will explore this idea. 3III. SHELL-TO-SHELL ENERGY TRANSFER IN FLUID TURBULENCE Using the combined energy transfer Suu(k|p,q), Domaradzki and Rogallo [1] have discussed energy transfe r between two shells. They interpret the quantity Tuu mn=1 2/summationdisplay kǫm/summationdisplay pǫnSuu(k|p,q). (5) as the rate of energy transfer from shell nto shell m[1,7]. Note that k-sum is over shell m,p-sum over shell n, andq=−k−p. However, Domaradzki and Rogallo [1] themselves points out that it may not be entirely correct to interpret the formula (5) as the shell-to-shell energy tran sfer. The reason for this is as follows: In the energy transfer between two shells mandn, two types of wavenumber triads are involved (see Fig. 1 show n below). In a triad of type I, the wavenumbers p, qare located in one shell, and kis located in the other. In a type II triad, wavenumber kis in one shell, porqin the other shell, and the third wavenumber is located outsi de the two shells. In Eq. (5) the summation is carried over both kind s of triads. However, it is easy to see that the energy transfer from shell nto shell mtakes place through both the k-pandk-qlegs of triad I but only through the k-p leg of triad II. Hence Batchelor’s and Domaradzki’s formali sm do not yield correct shell-to-shell energy transfers (as was pointed out by Batchelor and Domaradzki themselves). IV. MODE-TO-MODE ENERGY TRANSFER IN A TRIAD The nonlinear interaction in the Navier-Stokes and the MHD e quations are intrinsically three-mode interactions. The expression for the energy transfer to one mode of the tria d from the other two was presented in Section II. In this section we shall explore the possibility of obtainin g an expression for the energy transfer between any two modes within a triad — we will call it the mode-to-mode transfer . We emphasize that this approach is still within the framework of the triad interaction — that is, the triad is sti ll the fundamental interaction of which the mode-to-mode transfer is a part. The energy transfer between two modes of a triad by the mediation of the third mode is sought here. We shall first consider only the Navier-Stokes equation. In a later section, the discussion will be generalised to the MHD equation. 4A. Definition of Mode-to-Mode transfer in a triad Consider a triad k, p, q . Let the quantity R/uu(k|p|q) denote the energy transferred from mode pto mode kwith modeqplaying the role of a mediator (see Fig. 2). We wish to obtain a n expression for R/uu. TheR/uu’s should satisfy the following relationships : 1. The sum of R/uu(k|p|q) and R/uu(k|q|p), which represent energy transfer from mode pto mode kand from modeqto mode k, respectively, should be equal to the total energy transfer red to mode kfrom modes pand q, i.e.,Suu(k|p,q) [see Eq. (3)]. Thus, R/uu(k|p|q) +R/uu(k|q|p) =Suu(k|p,q), (6) R/uu(p|k|q) +R/uu(p|q|k) =Suu(p|k,q), (7) R/uu(q|k|p) +R/uu(q|p|k) =Suu(q|k,p). (8) 2. The energy transferred from mode pto mode k, i.e., R/uu(k|p|q), will be equal and opposite to the energy transferred from mode kto mode pi.e.,R/uu(p|k|q). Thus, R/uu(k|p|q) +R/uu(p|k|q) = 0, (9) R/uu(k|q|p) +R/uu(q|k|p) = 0, (10) R/uu(p|q|k) +R/uu(q|p|k) = 0. (11) These are six equations with six unknowns. However, the valu e of the determinant formed from the Eqs. (6)-(11) is zero. Therefore we cannot find unique R/uu’s given just these equations. However, it is reasonable to e xpect that there is a definite amount of energy transfer from one mode to the other mode, say from mode kto mode pgiven u(k), u(p), u(q) . Since Eqs. (6)-(11) do not yield a unique R/uu, we need to use constraints based on invariance, symmetries, etc. to get a definite R/uuusing Eqs. (6)-(11). 5B. Solutions of equations of mode-to-mode transfer One solution of Eqs. (6)-(11) is S/uu(k|p|q)≡ −Re(i[k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]), (12) From the definition of S/uu(k|p|q), it directly follows that S/uu’s satisfy the following conditions. S/uu(k|p|q) +S/uu(k|q|p) =Suu(k|p,q), (13) S/uu(p|k|q) +S/uu(p|q|k) =Suu(p|k,q), (14) S/uu(q|k|p) +S/uu(q|p|k) =Suu(q|k,p). (15) Using the triad relationship k+p+q=0, and the incompressibility constraint [ k.u(k) =0], it can be seen that S/uu’s, etc. also satisfy the following conditions S/uu(k|p|q) +S/uu(p|k|q) = 0, (16) S/uu(k|q|p) +S/uu(q|k|p) = 0, (17) S/uu(p|q|k) +S/uu(q|p|k) = 0. (18) Comparing Eqs. (13)-(18) with Eqs. (6)-(11), it is clear tha t the set of S/uu’s isone instance of the R/uu’s, i.e., R/uu(k|p|q) =S/uu(k|p|q). However, this is not a unique solution. If another solution R/uu(k|p|q) differs from S/uu(k|p|q) by an arbitrary function X∆, i.e.,R/uu(k|p|q) =S/uu(k|p|q)+ X∆, then by inspection we can easily see that every possible sol ution of Eqs. (6)-(11) must be of the form R/uu(k|p|q) =S/uu(k|p|q) +X∆ (19) R/uu(k|q|p) =S/uu(k|q|p)−X∆ (20) R/uu(p|k|q) =S/uu(p|k|q)−X∆ (21) R/uu(p|q|k) =S/uu(p|q|k) +X∆ (22) 6R/uu(q|k|p) =S/uu(q|k|p) +X∆ (23) R/uu(q|p|k) =S/uu(q|p|k)−X∆ (24) Note thatX∆can depend upon the wavenumber triad k, p, q, and the Fourier components u(k), u(p), u(q) .X∆ needs to be determined from other symmetry and invariance ar guments to uniquely fix R/uu. In Appendix A we have attempted to determine X∆. We construct X∆by observing that it can depend on k, p, q, u(k), u(p), u(q) ; and it must satisfy rotational invariance, galilean invar iance, and it should be finite. In our procedure we write down a general scalar function of k, p, q, u(k), u(p) , andu(q)with undetermined coefficients. The coefficients can be written as a series in the scalars of the typek.p,k.u(p) ,u(k).u(p) with unknown constants. By imposing invariance,and finiteness constraints we have s hown that, upto the linear order in these scalars, the coefficients must vanish, giving X∆= 0. Unfortunately, we have not been able to determine the hig her order coefficients. Hence, from the analysis of Appendix A we cannot show thatX∆will definitely vanish. However, if X∆= 0 we get a simple relationship, R/uu=S/uu, (25) giving the energy transfer between a pair of modes in a triad w ith the third mode mediating the transfer, as simply S/uu. But ifX∆/ne}ationslash= 0 then the energy transfer picture is more complex and the en ergy transfer between a pair of modes will be given by Eqs. (19)-(24) where X∆is unknown. However, even if X∆is unknown we can obtain very relevant information from the S/uu’s as is shown below. We will now give a physical interpretation to the two parts of R/uu’s, i.e., S/uu’s andX∆. We now see from Fig. 3 thatS/uu(k|p|q) +X∆gets transferred from ptok,S/uu(q|k|p) +X∆gets transferred from ktoq,S/uu(p|q|k) +X∆ gets transferred from qtop. The quantity X∆flows along p→k→q→p, circulating around the entire triad without changing the energy of any of the modes. Therefore we will call it the Circulating transfer . Of the total energy transfer between two modes, S/uu+X∆, only S/uucan bring about a change in modal energy. X∆transferred from mode pto mode kis transferred back to mode pvia mode q, i.e., the mode ptransfersX∆directly to mode k, and mode ptransfersX∆back to kindirectly through mode q. Thus the energy that is effectively transferred from modepto mode kis just S/uu(k|p|q). Therefore S/uu(k|p|q) can be be termed as the effective mode-to-mode transfer from mode pto mode k. 7In summary, we have attempted to obtain an expression for the energy transfer rate R/uubetween two modes in a triad. To leading order in a series expansion, we can show th atR/uu=S/uu. But the ambiguity in R/uuremains because of the lack of a complete proof. However, the importa nt conclusion is that the mode-to-mode energy transfer can be expressed as R/uu=S/uu+X∆where S/uuis the ‘effective mode-to-mode transfer’ and X∆is the ‘circulating transfer’. In the next section we will further develop the no tion of effective transfers by applying it to energy transfer between shells. V. SHELL-TO-SHELL ENERGY TRANSFER AND CASCADE RATES USING “ MODE-TO-MODE” FORMALISM In Section III we had pointed out the problem in treating the e xpression in Eq. (5) as the shell-to-shell transfer. This expression, commonly taken to be the shell-to-shell tr ansfer, actually gives the energy transferred to shell mfrom both shell nand the modes qof type II triads (see Fig. 1). In this section we will make use of the idea of “circulating” and “effective mode-to-mode transfer” to redefine shell-to- shell transfer. Consider energy transfer between shells mandnin Fig. 4 . The mode kis in shell m, the mode pis in shell n, and qcould be inside or outside the shells. In terms of the mode-to -mode transfer R/uu(k|p|q) from mode pto mode k, the energy transfer from shell nto shell mcan be defined as Tuu mn=/summationdisplay kǫm/summationdisplay pǫnR/uu(k|p|q) (26) where the k-sum is over shell m,p-sum is over shell n, andk+p+q=0 . The quantity R/uucan be written as a sum of an effective transfer S/uu(k|p|q) and a circulating transfer X∆. We know from the last section that the circulating transfer does not contribute to the energy change of modes. F rom Fig. 4 we can see that X∆flows from shell mto shellnand then flows back to mindirectly through the mode q. Therefore the effective energy transfer from shell m to shell nis just S/uu(k|p|q) summed over all kin shell mand all pin shell n, i.e., Tuu mn=/summationdisplay kǫm/summationdisplay pǫnS/uu(k|p|q), (27) where S/uu(k|p|q) is the effective mode-to-mode transfer. IfX∆= 0 then the effective energy transfer between two shells give n by this equation will be the same as the same as the total energy transfer between them given by Eq. (26). H owever, we have argued earlier that the circulating 8transfer does not result in the energy change of any of the mod es. Hence, from the physical point of view the effective shell-to-shell transfer is a very relevant quantity to stud y. In a subsequent paper we have studied the effective shell-to-shell transfers in numerical simulations. A. Energy cascade rates The kinetic energy cascade rate (Π) (or flux) in fluid turbulen ce is defined as the rate of loss of kinetic energy by a sphere in k-space to the modes outside. In literature, the energy flux in fluid turbulence has been computed using Suu(k|p,q) [14,15]. Kraichnan [15] shows by direct integration of Eq. (2) that the kinetic energy lost from a sphere of radiusKby nonlinear convective transfers is Π(K) =−/summationdisplay |k|<K/summationdisplay |p|>K1 2Suu(k|p,q). (28) Although the energy cascade rate in fluid turbulence can be fo und by the above formula, the mode-to-mode approach provides a more natural way of looking at the energy transfer s. In later sections we will obtain expressions for mode-to-mode transfer in MHD turbulence and define various fl uxes which are not accessible to the conventional approach. Here, we will obtain an expression for the flux in te rms of the effective mode-to-mode energy transfer. Since R/uu(k|p|q) represents energy transfer from ptokwithqas the mediator, we may alternatively write the energy loss from a sphere as Π(K) =−/summationdisplay |k|<K/summationdisplay |p|>KR/uu(k|p|q). (29) where mode kis inside the sphere, pis outside the sphere, and q=−k−p. The mode-to-mode transfer R/uu(k|p|q) consists of a circulating part and an effective part. From Fig . 5 we see that the net amount of circulating transfer leaving the sphere is zero. Thus the circulating transfer ma kes no contribution to the the energy flux from the sphere. Therefore, it can be removed from Eq. (29) and the resultant e xpression for the flux can be written as Π(K) =−/summationdisplay |k|<K/summationdisplay |p|>KS/uu(k|p|q). (30) with a summation over the effective mode-to-mode transfer. T he expressions in Eqs. (28) and (30) are equivalent as is formally proved in Appendix B. 9VI. ENERGY TRANSFER IN A MHD TRIAD: KNOWN RESULTS The MHD equations in real space are written as ∂u ∂t+ (u.∇)u=−∇p+ (b.∇)b+ν∇2u, (31) and ∂b ∂t+ (u.∇)b= (b.∇)u+µ∇2b, (32) where uandbare the velocity and magnetic fields respectively, and νandµare the fluid kinematic viscosity and magnetic diffusivity, respectively. In Fourier space, the k inetic energy and magnetic energy evolution equations for a Fourier mode are ∂Eu(k) ∂t+ 2νk2Eu(k) =/summationdisplay k+p+q=01 2Suu(k|p,q) +/summationdisplay k+p+q=01 2Sub(k|p,q), (33) ∂Eb(k) ∂t+ 2µk2Eb(k) =/summationdisplay k+p+q=01 2Sbb(k|p,q) +/summationdisplay k+p+q=01 2Sbu(k|p,q), (34) whereEu(k) =|u(k)|2/2 is the kinetic energy, and Eb(k) =|b(k)|2/2 is the magnetic energy. The four nonlinear termsSuu(k|p,q),Sub(k|p,q)Sbb(k|p,q) andSbu(k|p,q) are Suu(k|p,q)≡ −Re(i[k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)] +i[k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]), (35) Sbb(k|p,q)≡ −Re(i[k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)] +i[k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]), (36) Sub(k|p,q)≡Re(i[k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)] +i[k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]), (37) Sbu(k|p,q)≡Re(i[k.b(q)][b(k).u(p)] +i[k.b(p)][b(k).u(q)]). (38) These terms are conventionally taken to represent the nonli near transfer from modes pandqto mode k[16,13] of a triad such that k+p+q= 0. The term Suu(k|p,q) represents the net transfer of kinetic energy from modes pand qto mode k. Likewise the term Sub(k|p,q) is the net magnetic energy transferred from modes pandqto the kinetic energy in mode k, whereasSbu(k|p,q) is the net kinetic energy transferred from modes pandqto the magnetic energy in mode k. The term Sbb(k|p,q) represents the transfer of magnetic energy from modes pandqto mode k. All these transfer terms are represented in the Fig. 6. 10Stanisic [16] showed that the nonlinear terms satisfy the fo llowing detailed conservation properties: Suu(k|p,q) +Suu(p|k,q) +Suu(q|k,p) = 0, (39) Sbb(k|p,q) +Sbb(p|k,q) +Sbb(q|k,p) = 0, (40) and Sub(k|p,q) +Sub(p|k,q) +Sub(q|k,p) +Sbu(k|p,q) +Sbu(p|k,q) +Sbu(q|k,p) = 0. (41) The Eq. (39) implies that kinetic energy is transferred cons ervatively between the velocity modes of a wavenumber triad, and the Eq. (40) implies that magnetic energy is also t ransferred conservatively between the magnetic modes of a wavenumber triad. The Eq. (41) implies that the cross tra nsfers of kinetic and magnetic energy, Sub(k|p,q) and Sbu(k|p,q), within a triad are also energy conserving. The quantities Suu(k|p,q),Sub(k|p,q),Sbb(k|p,q), andSbu(k|p,q) represent the nonlinear energy transfer from thetwo modes pandqto mode k. It would be useful to know the energy transfer between any two modes , say from ptok. This issue will be explored in the next section. VII. “MODE-TO-MODE” ENERGY TRANSFERS IN MHD EQUATIONS In Section IV we had presented a new approach to describe the e nergy transfer between two velocity modes of a triad mediated by the third velocity mode, in the Navier-Sto kes equation. In the same spirit we will now attempt to find the mode-to-mode energy transfers in MHD. In MHD turbu lence there will be three kinds of mode-to-mode transfer within a wavenumber triad k, p, q : kinetic energy transfer from u(p)tou(k); magnetic energy transfer from b(p)tob(k); and transfer of kinetic energy from u(p) to magnetic energy in b(k). We denote these three transfers byR/uu(k|p|q),R/bb(k|p|q), and R/bu(k|p|q) respectively, where the index qindicates that the energy transfer between modes pandkis mediated by the mode q. Since the nonlinear interactions fundamentally involve t hree-modes, the energy transfer between a pair of modes should depend on the t hird mode. The mode-to-mode transfers R/uu,R/bb, andR/buare schematically illustrated in Fig. 7. In this section we will obtain a description for each of these transfers. 11A. Velocity mode to velocity mode energy transfers In Section IV we discussed the mode-to-mode transfer, R/uu, between velocity modes in fluid flows. In this section we will find R/uufor MHD flows. The transfer of kinetic energy between the velo city modes is brought about by the term (u.∇)u, both in the Navier Stokes and MHD equations. Hence, the expr ession for the combined kinetic energy transfer to a mode from the other two modes of the triad is also same for the two. i.e., the combined transfer to u(k) fromu(p) andu(q) is given by Suu(k|p,q) [see Eqs. (3) and (35)]. Consequently, R/uu’s for MHD will satisfy the constraints given in Eqs. (6)-(11) for the corresponding R/uu’s for fluids. As a result, R/uu(k|p,q) in MHD can be expressed as a sum of a circulating transfer X∆and the effective transfer S/uu(k|p|q) given by Eq. (12), i.e., R/uu(k|p|q) =S/uu(k|p|q) +X∆ (42) The arguments are the same as those presented in Section IVB f or fluid turbulence. B. Magnetic mode to Magnetic mode energy transfers Now we consider the magnetic energy transfer from mode b(p) tob(k) in the triad ( k,p,q) [see Fig. 7]. This transfer which is denoted by R/bb(k|p|q), should satisfy the following relationships : 1. The sum of the mode-to-mode energy transfers from b(p) tob(k)and from b(q)tob(k)should be equal to Sbb(k|p,q) [Eq. (36) in Section VI], which is the combined energy trans fer tob(k)fromb(p)andb(q). Thus, R/bb(k|p|q) +R/bb(k|q|p) =Sbb(k|p,q), (43) R/bb(p|k|q) +R/bb(p|q|k) =Sbb(p|k,q), (44) R/bb(q|k|p) +R/bb(q|p|k) =Sbb(q|k,p). (45) 2. the energy transfer from b(k) tob(p),R/bb(k|p|q), and the transfer from b(p) tob(k),R/bb(p|k|q), should be equal but opposite in sign. That is, R/bb(k|p|q) +R/bb(p|k|q) = 0, (46) R/bb(k|q|p) +R/bb(q|k|p) = 0, (47) 12R/bb(p|q|k) +R/bb(q|p|k) = 0. (48) Once again, the above equations cannot uniquely determine R/bb(k|p|q) since the value of the determinant formed from these equations is zero. While discussing the mode-to- mode energy transfers in Navier Stokes equation in Section IV we got the same result for R/uu(k|p|q). Following the reasoning in Section IV, we can extract phys ically meaningful information from Eqs. (43)-(48). The combined energy transfer to b(k)fromb(p)andb(q)is given by Eq. (36) of Section VI. We denote the first term on the right hand side of that equation by S/bb(k|p|q), i.e., S/bb(k|p|q)≡ −Re(i[k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]), (49) By replacing S/bb(k|p|q) forR/bb(k|p|q) in Eqs. (43)-(48) we find that S/bb(k|p|q) is a solution of these equations, i.e., S/bb(k|p|q) +S/bb(k|q|p) =Sbb(k|p,q), (50) S/bb(p|k|q) +S/bb(p|q|k) =Sbb(p|k,q), (51) S/bb(q|k|p) +S/bb(q|p|k) =Sbb(q|k,p). (52) and S/bb(k|p|q) +S/bb(p|k|q) = 0, (53) S/bb(k|q|p) +S/bb(q|k|p) = 0, (54) S/bb(p|q|k) +S/bb(q|p|k) = 0. (55) Thus, S/bb(k|p|q) is a solution of the equations (43)—(48). By inspection it c an be seen that allsolutions of the equations can be expressed as R/bb(k|p|q) =S/bb(k|p|q) +Y∆, (56) R/bb(k|q|p) =S/bb(k|q|p)−Y∆, (57) R/bb(p|k|q) =S/bb(p|k|q)−Y∆, (58) 13R/bb(p|q|k) =S/bb(p|q|k) +Y∆, (59) R/bb(q|k|p) =S/bb(q|k|p) +Y∆, (60) R/bb(q|p|k) =S/bb(q|p|k)−Y∆, (61) whereY∆is an arbitrary scalar function dependent on the wavenumber triadk, p, q and the Fourier components u(k), u(p), u(q), b(k), b(p), b(q) at those wavenumbers. To determine the unique form of this fu nction we need to impose additional constraints, similar to those imp osed onX∆in Appendix A for determining mode-to-mode energy transfer between velocity modes in fluid turbulence ( see Section IVB). The arguments for determination of Y∆is given in Appendix B. The solutions in Eqs. (56)-(61) have been schematically ill ustrated in Fig. 8. We see from the figure that Y∆is transferred from b(p)→b(k)→b(q)→and back to b(p), i.e., it circulates around the triad without causing any change in modal energy — it is a thus a circulating transfer. T he magnetic energy effectively transferred from b(p) tob(k)is just S/bb(k|p|q)1,i.e., R/bb eff(k|p|q) =S/bb(k|p|q). (62) The effective mode-to-mode transfer S/bb(k|p|q) from b(p) tob(k)is mediated by the velocity mode u(q). In the next section we will use R/bb effto calculate effective energy transfer rate between the magn etic modes inside two shells and the effective cascade rate of magnetic energy. C. Velocity mode to Magnetic mode energy transfers In Section VII A and Section VII B we discussed mode-to-mode e nergy transfer between a pair of velocity modes and between a pair of magnetic modes in a wavenumber triad, re spectively. We now consider the energy transfer between u(p) andb(k),R/ub(k|p|q), within the triad ( k, p, q ) illustrated in Fig. 7 . We will follow the same sequence of steps as in the two sections VII A and VII B. R/ub’s will satisfy the following relationships: 1the idea of circulating transfer and effective mode-to-mode transfer in a triad was introduced in Section IVB — a detailed discussion can be found in that section. 141. Since R/ub(k|p|q) andR/ub(k|q|p) are the mode-to-mode energy transfers from b(p)tou(k)and from b(q)to u(k), the sum of the two should be equal to Sub(k|p,q), the combined energy transfer to u(k)fromb(p) and b(q). Therefore, we get R/ub(k|p|q) +R/ub(k|q|p) =Sub(k|p,q), (63) R/ub(p|k|q) +R/ub(p|q|k) =Sub(p|k,q), (64) R/ub(q|k|p) +R/ub(q|p|k) =Sub(q|k,p). (65) R/bu(k|p|q) +R/bu(k|q|p) =Sbu(k|p,q), (66) R/bu(p|k|q) +R/bu(p|q|k) =Sbu(p|k,q), (67) R/bu(q|k|p) +R/bu(q|p|k) =Sbu(q|k,p). (68) 2.R/ub(k|p|q) denotes the energy transfer from b(p)tou(k).R/bu(p|k|q) is physically the same transfer but seen as a transfer from u(k)tob(p). Therefore, R/ub(k|p|q) +R/bu(p|k|q) = 0, (69) R/ub(k|q|p) +R/bu(q|k|p) = 0, (70) R/ub(p|q|k) +R/bu(q|p|k) = 0. (71) R/bu(k|p|q) +R/ub(p|k|q) = 0, (72) R/bu(k|q|p) +R/ub(q|k|p) = 0, (73) R/bu(p|q|k) +R/ub(q|p|k) = 0. (74) 15The solutions of these equations are not unique and the expre ssion for the energy transfer between modes cannot be obtained from the above equations alone. As in sections IV and VII A, we will now explore the solutions of the above equations. We define the following quantities : S/ub(k|p|q)≡ −Re(i[k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]), (75) S/bu(k|p|q)≡ −Re(i[k.b(q)][b(k).u(p)]), (76) Replacing S/ubandS/buforR/ubandR/burespectively in Eqs. (63)-(74) we find that the S/’s are a solution to those equations, i.e., S/ub(k|p|q) +S/ub(k|q|p) =Sub(k|p,q), (77) S/ub(p|k|q) +S/ub(p|q|k) =Sub(p|k,q), (78) S/ub(q|k|p) +S/ub(q|p|k) =Sub(q|k,p). (79) S/bu(k|p|q) +S/bu(k|q|p) =Sbu(k|p,q), (80) S/bu(p|k|q) +S/bu(p|q|k) =Sbu(p|k,q), (81) S/bu(q|k|p) +S/bu(q|p|k) =Sbu(q|k,p), (82) and S/ub(k|p|q) +S/bu(p|k|q) = 0, (83) S/ub(k|q|p) +S/bu(q|k|p) = 0, (84) S/ub(p|q|k) +S/bu(q|p|k) = 0, (85) S/bu(k|p|q) +S/ub(p|k|q) = 0, (86) 16S/bu(k|q|p) +S/ub(q|k|p) = 0, (87) S/bu(p|q|k) +S/ub(q|p|k) = 0. (88) TheS/ub’s are just a single instance of the the R/ub’s. It can be seen by inspection that allsolutions can be expressed in the form : R/bu(k|p|q) =S/bu(k|p|q) +Z∆, (89) R/bu(k|q|p) =S/bu(k|q|p)−Z∆, (90) R/bu(p|k|q) =S/bu(p|k|q)−Z∆, (91) R/bu(p|q|k) =S/bu(p|q|k) +Z∆, (92) R/bu(q|k|p) =S/bu(q|k|p) +Z∆, (93) R/bu(q|p|k) =S/bu(q|p|k)−Z∆, (94) R/ub(k|p|q) =S/ub(k|p|q) +Z∆, (95) R/ub(k|q|p) =S/ub(k|q|p)−Z∆, (96) R/ub(p|k|q) =S/ub(p|k|q)−Z∆, (97) R/ub(p|q|k) =S/ub(p|q|k) +Z∆, (98) R/ub(q|k|p) =S/ub(q|k|p) +Z∆, (99) R/ub(q|p|k) =S/ub(q|p|k)−Z∆, (100) whereZ∆is an arbitrary function dependent on k, p, q, u(k), u(p), u(q), b(k), b(p), b(q) . These solutions are pictorially represented in Fig. 9 below. 17We are already familiar with such solutions from the earlier discussions. From Fig. 9 we see that Z∆transfers energy from u(p)→b(k)→u(q)→b(p)→u(k)→b(q)→and back to u(p) without resulting in a change in modal energy. Hence, following the discussions in Section VII A an d Section VII B, we can interpret the quantity Z∆as a circulating transfer. The S/bucan be interpreted as the effective mode-to-mode transfers. For example, S/bu(k|p|q) is the effective transfer from u(p) tob(k),i.e, R/bu eff(k|p|q) =S/bu(k|p|q), (101) which is mediated by the magnetic mode b(q). In the next section, we will use the effective mode-to-mode tr ansfer to define, (a) shell-to-shell transfers between the velocity and the magnetic modes, and (b) cascade rates be tween the velocity and the magnetic modes. VIII. SHELL-TO-SHELL ENERGY TRANSFER AND CASCADE RATES IN M HD TURBULENCE In this section, we will extend the formulation of Section V t o define shell-to-shell transfer rates and cascade rates in MHD turbulence. We shall use the term u-shell and u-sphere respectively to denote a shell and a sphere in k-space containing velocity modes, and b-shell and b-sphere for the corresponding magnetic modes. A. Shell-to-Shell energy transfer rates In Section V we had defined the effective shell-to-shell trans fer rates between two u-shells in Fourier space. The expression for the effective mode-to-mode transfer between two velocity modes is the same for both Fluid and MHD flows [see Section IVB and VII A]. Hence, the effective shell-t o-shell transfer rates between two u-shells in MHD will also be defined by Eq. (27) of Section V, i.e., Tuu mn=/summationdisplay kǫm/summationdisplay pǫnS/uu(k|p|q). (102) Similarly, the quantity R/bb(k|p|q) gives the energy transfer rate from b(p) tob(k), mediated by q. Hence the energy transfer rate from nthb-shell to the mthb-shell can be obtained by summing R/bb(k|p|q) over every pin the thenthb-shell and over every kin themthb-shell. From Section VII B we know that R/bb=S/bb(k|p|q) +Y∆, where S/bb(k|p|q) is the effective mode-to-mode transfer from b(p) tob(k), andY∆is a circulating transfer. Thus, Y∆is 18transferred from b(p)in shell ntob(k)in shell mand then back to b(p)via the mode b(q). Therefore, the effective shell-to-shell transfer transfer rate from the nthto themthb-shell is Tbb mn=/summationdisplay kǫm/summationdisplay pǫnS/bb(k|p|q). (103) We can now also define shell-to-shell transfers rates betwee n au-shell and a b-shell. R/bu(k|p|q) is the energy transfer rate from u(p)tob(k)mediated by mode q. Hence the energy transfer rate from the the nthu-shell to the mthb-shell can be calculated by summing R/bu(k|p|q) over every pin thenthu-shell and over every kinmthb-shell. We have shown in Section VII C that R/bu(k|p|q) =S/bu(k|p|q) +Z∆, where S/bu(k|p|q) is the effective mode-to-mode transfer from the mode u(p)to the mode b(k)in the triad k, p, q , andZ∆is the circulating transfer which is transferred along u(p)→b(k)→u(q)→b(p)→u(k)→b(q)→u(p). Hence,Z∆is transferred from the mode u(p) in shell nto b(k)in shell mand then flows back to u(p)via the modes u(q)→b(p)→u(k)→b(q)→u(p)→u(p). Therefore, we interpret the quantity obtained by summing S/bu(k|p|q) over every pin thenthu-shell and every kin themth b-shell as the effective shell-to-shell transfer. That is, Tbu mn=/summationdisplay kǫm/summationdisplay pǫnS/bu(k|p|q) (104) is the effective transfer from the the nthu-shell to the mthb-shell. The energy transfer rate from the nthb-shell to themthu-shell,Tub mn=−Tbu mn. In Appendix A-C, we have argued that the circulating transfe rX∆= 0,Y∆= 0, andZ∆= 0 to the first order in the expansion coefficients. If X∆= 0,Y∆= 0,Z∆= 0, then the effective shell-to-shell transfers will be the s ame as the total shell-to-shell transfers. However, we had pointe d out is Section V that the circulating transfer, if nonzero, does not contribute to a change in energy of any shell, and hen ce from the physical point of view the effective shell- to-shell transfers is of greater significance than the total shell-to-shell transfers. We have numerically computed th e effective shell-to-shell transfers given by Eqs. (102)-(10 4) in numerical simulations of 2-D MHD turbulence and gained important insights into the energy transfer process. The re sults of the simulations will be discussed in a companion paper [17]. B. Energy cascade rates There are various types of cascade rates (energy fluxes) in MH D turbulence. We have schematically shown these transfers in Fig. 10. In this section we will derive the formu lae to calculate these cascade rates within the framework 19of effective transfers. In Section VA, we derived an expression for kinetic energy flu x in terms of the mode-to-mode transfer [Eq. (26)]. We showed that the circulating transfer X∆does not contribute to the flux. Hence, the kinetic energy flux can be expressed by Eq. (30) in terms of the effective mode-to-mode t ransfer S/uu(k|p|q). The kinetic energy flux Πu< u>(the energy transfer rate from the u-sphere to outside the same sphere) in MHD will also be given b y the same equation, i.e., Πu< u>(K) =/summationdisplay |p|<K/summationdisplay |k|>KS/uu(k|p|q). (105) The magnetic energy flux Πb< b>(K) is defined as the rate of energy lost by the b-sphere to the modes outside the b-sphere. Since R/bb(k|p|q) is the mode-to-mode transfer from b(p) tob(k), Πb< b>(K) can be obtained by summing R/bb(k|p|q) over every mode pinside the b-sphere and every mode koutside the b-sphere, i.e., Πb< b>(K) =/summationdisplay |p|<K/summationdisplay |k|>KR/bb(k|p|q). (106) As in the kinetic energy flux, the circulating transfer Y∆will not contribute to the magnetic energy flux in Eq. (106). We briefly explain this as follows: let us take the mode b(q)to be outside the b-sphere. Then if the mode b(k)loses Y∆to mode b(p)then it will also gain Y∆from mode b(q), and hence Y∆will not contribute to the magnetic energy flux. Similar arguments apply when b(q) is inside the b-sphere. Therefore, we can write the magnetic energy flux in Eq. (106) as Πb< b>(K) =/summationdisplay |p|<K/summationdisplay |k|>KS/bb(k|p|q). (107) where S/bb(k|p|q) is given by Eq. (49) of Section VII B. Similarly, the energy transfer between the kinetic energy a nd magnetic energy can be described by four types of fluxes. We shall define these fluxes below. There is a transfer of energy from a u-sphere of radius Kto the b-sphere of the same radius. The rate of loss of energy from the u-sphere to the corresponding b-sphere can be calculated by by summing R/bu(k|p|q) over every mode inside the b-sphere and the u-sphere. Following the definition of the effective shell-to- shell transfer Tbu mnwe can define the effective flux from the u-sphere to the b-sphere as Πu< b<(K) =/summationdisplay |p|<K/summationdisplay |k|<KS/bu(k|p|q). (108) 20by summing the effective mode-to-mode transfer, S/bu(k|p|q), from u(p)tob(k), over the modes inside the u-sphere and the b-sphere. There is a transfer of energy from the u-sphere to the magnetic modes outside the corresponding b-sphere. The rate of loss of the the energy from the u-sphere to the modes outside the b-sphere can be obtained by summing R/bu(k|p|q) over every mode inside the u-sphere and every mode outside the b-sphere. The corresponding effective flux can be calculated using Πu< b>(K) =/summationdisplay |p|<K/summationdisplay |k|>KS/bu(k|p|q). (109) Similarly, there is a transfer of magnetic energy from a b-sphere to velocity modes outside the u-sphere. The rate of loss of energy from the b-sphere to the modes outside the u-sphere can be calculated by Πb< u>(K) =/summationdisplay |p|<K/summationdisplay |k|>KS/ub(k|p|q). (110) There is a transfer of energy from modes outside the u-sphere to the modes outside the b-sphere. The rate of loss of energy by the modes outside the u-sphere to the modes outside the b-sphere can be obtained by Πu> b>(K) =/summationdisplay |p|>K/summationdisplay |k|>KS/bu(k|p|q). (111) The total effective flux is defined as the total energy (kinetic +magnetic) lost by the K-sphere to the modes outside, i.e., Πtot(K) = Πu< u>(K) + Πb< b>(K) + Πu< b>(K) + Πb< u>(K). (112) A schematic illustration of the effective fluxes defined in Eqs . (105)-(111) was given in Fig. 10. If the circulating transfer is zero, then each of the effective fluxes will be the s ame as the corresponding total fluxes. In a subsequent paper we will present the results of the detailed study of the se fluxes in numerical simulations of 2-D MHD turbulence. IX. CONCLUSION In literature we find a description of energy transfer rates f rom two modes in a triad to the third mode, i.e., from u(p) andu(q)tou(k). Here we have constructed new formulae to describe energy tr ansfer rates between a pair of modes in the triad (mode-to-mode transfer), say from u(p)tou(k). The third mode in the triad acts as a mediator in the transfer process. 21The mode-to-mode energy transfer in our formalism can be exp ressed as a combination of an “effective transfer” anda “circulating transfer”. In Appendices A-C we have shown by imposing galilean invariance, symmetry and some other constraints that the circulating transfer should be z ero. A completely general proof is not available at present. However even if the circulating transfer happens to be nonze ro, it will not result in a change of modal energy, since the amount of circulating transfer gained by mode kfrom mode pis also lost by mode kto mode q(see Figs. 3, 8, 9). Only the effective transfer is responsible for modal ener gy change. As the circulating transfer does not have any observable effect on the energy of the modes, it may be correct to ignore it from the study of energy transfer. Using the notion of effective mode-to-mode transfer and the c irculating transfer we defined effective shell-to-shell energy transfer rates and energy fluxes in fluid turbulence [s ee Eq. (27) and Eq. (30)] and in MHD turbulence [see Eqs. (102)-(104) and Eqs. (105)-(111)]. Some of these energ y transfers can be obtained only using the “mode-to-mode” energy transfer formulae. In a companion paper [17] we prese nt the results of our numerical study of the effective shell-to-shell energy transfer rates and energy fluxes in 2- D MHD turbulence. 22APPENDIX A: DERIVATION OF THE CIRCULATING TRANSFER BETWEEN THE VELOCITY MODES IN A TRIAD In Section IV we showed that the mode-to-mode transfer is giv en by R/uu=S/uu+X∆. We interpreted X∆as a circulating transfer and S/uu[Eq. (12)] as an effective mode-to-mode transfer. In this app endix we shall determine the circulating transfer X∆for fluid and MHD turbulence, using symmetry considerations . In the first section we shall discussX∆in fluid turbulence and in the next section we will discuss the MHD turbulence. 1.X∆in fluid turbulence The energy transfer between pair of modes should be invarian t under a rotation (because it is a scalar), and galilean transformation, and it should be finite for all values of k, p, q, u(k), u(p), u(q) . We will determine the form of the circulating transfer by imposing these and a few other symme try constraints. We construct a scalar expression for X∆dependent on k, p, q, u(k), u(p), u(q) , and which is cubic in uand linear in k, porq, to satisfy the for dimensional reasons. We write the genera l expression for such a scalar as X∆=Re([k.u(q)]{[u(k).u(p)]α+ [u(k).u(q)]β+ [u(p).u(q)]γ+ [u(k).u(k)]δ+ [u(p).u(p)]ν+ [u(q).u(q)]µ}+ [k.u(p)]{[u(k).u(p)]η+ [u(k).u(q)]ζ+ [u(p).u(q)]ǫ+ [u(k).u(k)]κ+ [u(p).u(p)]λ+ [u(q).u(q)]θ}+ [p.u(k)]{[u(k).u(p)]ψ+...+ [u(p).u(q)]ω+...+ [u(q).u(q)]χ}+ [p.u(q)]{[u(k).u(p)]τ+...+ [u(p).u(q)]φ+...+ [u(q).u(q)]ϕ}+ [q.u(k)]{[u(k).u(p)]σ+...+ [u(p).u(q)]ξ+...+ [u(q).u(q)]ς}+ [q.u(p)][[u(k).u(p)]π+ [u(k).u(q)]ρ+...+ [u(q).u(q)]̺}) (A.1) where all the coefficients α,β, etc. are atmost non-dimensional functions of the wavenumb ersk, p, q and of u(k), u(p), u(q) . ‘Re’ in the expression in Eq. (A.1) indicates the real part of the expression. We should have infact writtenX∆as a linear combination of the real and the imaginary parts of the entire expression in the above equation. However, we will only consider the real part explicitly. The imaginary part can be treated in the same manner and the following conclusions, although explicitly stated for the real part will also be valid for the imaginary part. The 23most general expression should also contain terms of the kin dRe[k.u(q)]Re[u(k).u(p)],Re[k.u(q)]Im[u(k).u(p)], andIm[k.u(q)]Im[u(k).u(p)]. However, we will explain below that such terms should not be present in X∆on account of galilean invariance. Hence, from the outset we do not include such terms. The task now is to determine the coefficients in Eq. (A.1). The interactions involves all three modes of the triad, i.e. , if the Fourier coefficients of any of the wavenumbers is zero, interaction between the modes is turned off. The mode-t o-mode transfer should respect this fundamental feature of the triad interactions. Therefore, if u(k), u(p) oru(q) approach zero, X∆should approach zero as well. We will argue below that α,β, etc., in Eq. (A.1) are independent of the magnitude of u(k), u(p), u(q) . By inspecting Eq. (A.1) for X∆, hence we find that a few terms in the expression are independe nt of the magnitude of atleast one of the Fourier components. For example, the term [ k.u(q)][u(k).u(q)]βis independent of u(p). Such terms should be dropped from the expression of circulating transfer. Aft er dropping such terms, we obtain X∆=Re([k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]α+ [k.u(p)][[u(k).u(q)]ζ+ [p.u(k)][[u(p).u(q)]ω+ [p.u(q)][[u(k).u(p)]τ+ [q.u(k)][[u(p).u(q)]ξ+ [q.u(p)][[u(k).u(q)]ρ) (A.2) The requirement of finiteness of the mode-to-mode transfer i mposes restrictions on the form of X∆. In Eq. (A.1) the dimensional terms are [ k.u(q)][[u(k).u(p)], [k.u(p)][[u(k).u(q)], etc. and they are finite for all values of k, p, q, u(k), u(p), u(q) . The coefficients α,β, etc. are ‘dimensionless scalars’. Therefore they can be wr itten as α=f[k.p kp,k.p kq,...,k.u(p) k|u(p)|,k.u(p) k|u(q)|,...,u(k).u(p) |u(k)||u(p)|,u(k).u(p) |u(k)||u(q)|,...] (A.3) where the arguments of the function have been non-dimension alised. Consider triads in which one of the wavenumbers, sayq, tends to zero. Then the terms like k.p/kqwithqin the denominator diverge. Similarly if one of the Fourier coefficients, say u(q), is equal to zero, then the argumentsk.u(p) k|u(q)|andu(k).u(p) |u(k)||u(q)|, etc. diverge. Hence terms which depend on the magnitude of vectors must not appear in the expr ession of the dimensionless scalars α,β, etc. Only the arguments which depend on the angles between vectors, e.g.,k.u(p) k|u(p)|,u(k).u(p) |u(k)||u(p)|, should be included. Therefore, all the dimensionless coefficients should be a function of only these arguments, i.e., α=f[k.p kp,...,k.u(p) k|u(p)|,...,u(k).u(p) |u(k)||u(p)|,...]. We now write the coefficient α,ζ, etc. in the form α=α(0)+α(1)+α(2)+α(3)+α(4)+α(5)(A.4) 24whereα(0)is a constant, and α(1)=α(1) 1k.p kp+α(1) 2k.q kq+α(1) 3p.q pq, (A.5) α(2)=α(2) 1k.u(p) k|u(p)|+α(2) 2k.u(q) k|u(q)|+α(2) 3p.u(k) p|u(k)|+α(2) 4p.u(q) p|u(q)|+α(2) 5q.u(k) q|u(k)|+α(2) 6q.u(p) q|u(p)|, (A.6) α(3)=α(3) 1u(k).u(p) |u(k)||u(p)|+α(3) 2u(k).u(q) |u(k)||u(q)|+α(3) 3u(p).u(q) |u(p)||u(q)|. (A.7) The quantities α(1),α(2),α(3)are ‘linear’ in the scalars of the type k.p/kp,k.u(p)/k|u(p)|, andu(k).u(p)/|u(k)||u(p)| respectively. The quantity α(4)contains terms like ( k.p)2/k2p2, [k.u(p)]2/k2([u(p).u(p)], etc. which are higher order in these scalars. All the other coefficients ζ,γ,ω, etc. in Eq. (A.1) can be similarly divided into linear and non -linear terms. We now study the consequences of galilean invariance of X∆on Eq. (A.1). Consider two frames of reference Sand S′withSmoving with respect to S′with velocity U0. We denote the Fourier coefficient of velocity in frame Sand S′byu(k) andu′(k) respectively. The relationship between u(k) andu′(k) is given by u′(k) =u(k) expi(k.U0)t+U0δ(k). (A.8) The second term is non-zero only for the k= 0 modes. In the subsequent discussion relating to galilean invariance we can drop this term for sake of simplicity without affecting th e derivation. The transformation rule for scalars of the typek.p, k.u(p), u(k).u(p) between the two frames of references SandS′can be deduced from the transformation property of u(k). k′.u′(q′) =k.u(q) expi(q.U0)t(A.9) u′(k′).u′(p′) =u(k).u(p) expi(k+p).U0t(A.10) It follows from the above two transformation rules that k.u(q) andu(k).u(p) are not invariant under a change of reference frame. However, a product of these quantities can be seen to be invariant [k′.u′(q′)][u′(k′).u′(p′)] = [k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)] expi(k+p+q).U0t = [k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)] (A.11) usingk+p+q=0 . However, 25Re[k′.u′(q′)]Re[u′(k′).u′(p′)]/ne}ationslash=Re[k.u(q)]Re[u(k).u(p)], (A.12) Re[k′.u′(q′)]Im[u′(k′).u′(p′)]/ne}ationslash=Re[k.u(q)]Im[u(k).u(p)], (A.13) and Im[k′.u′(q′)]Im[u′(k′).u′(p′)]/ne}ationslash=Im[k.u(q)]Im[u(k).u(p)] (A.14) Thus, we have shown that the terms of the kind given in the abov e three equations are not galilean invariant. Clearly, the invariance under Galilean transformation dem ands that all of the vectors u(k), u(p), u(q) appear either once, twice, or ntimes in the scalar. A scalar of the type [ k.u(q)][u(k).u(q)] having two or more repeated wavenumber indices is not invariant since the term appearin g in the exponential is not zero for such a scalar. The transformation properties of any quantity formed from the s calars like k.p, k.u(p), u(k).u(p) can be obtained in a similar manner. If the quantity is not galilean invarian t then it should not be included in the expression for mode-to-mode transfer. We have shown above that scalars of the type k.u(q) andu(k).u(p) are not Galilean invariant [Eqs. (A.9) and (A.10)]. It follows that α(2),β(2), etc.,α(3),β(3), etc. are not Galilean invariant. To preserve the Galilean i nvariance ofX∆, the coefficients α(2)andα(3)should be dropped from Eq. (A.4). However, the nonlinear qua ntityα(4)can be constructed in a Galilean invariant form. Currently, we hav e dropped these higher order terms. Our derivation of X∆ therefore has the limitation of being strictly valid only up to the linear order. A complete proof containing all order of terms in X∆is beyond the scope of this thesis and is left for future work. After dropping the terms α(2),α(3),α(4), the Eq. (A.4) reduces to α=α(0)+α(1)(A.15) Using equations (A.4) and (A.15) we now write X in Eq. (A.2) as , X∆=Re([k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]{α0+α1k.p kp+α2k.q kq+α3p.q pq}+ [k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]{ζ0+ζ1k.p kp+ζ2k.q kq+ζ3p.q pq}+ [p.u(k)][u(p).u(q)]{ω0+ω1k.p kp+ω2k.q kq+ω3p.q pq}+ [p.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]{τ0+τ1k.p kp+τ2k.q kq+τ3p.q pq}+ [q.u(k)][u(p).u(q)]{ξ0+ξ1k.p kp+ξ2k.q kq+ξ3p.q pq}+ [q.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]{ρ0+ρ1k.p kp+ρ2k.q kq+ρ3p.q pq}) (A.16) 26We have dropped the superscript′1′fromα(1) 1,α(1) 2,α(1) 3. Using the incompressibility relationship q.u(q) =0we obtain p.u(q) =−(k+q).u(q) =−k.u(q). Therefore, fourth term in the above equation can be absorb ed into the first term. Similarly, using the relationships q.u(p) =−k.u(p) andq.u(k) =−p.u(k), the last term can be combined with the second term and the fifth term combined with the third term. Now, we can write X∆=Re([k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]{α0+α1k.p kp+α2k.q kq+α3p.q pq}+ [k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]{ζ0+ζ1k.p kp+ζ2k.q kq+ζ3p.q pq}+ [p.u(k)][u(p).u(q)]{ω0+ω1k.p kp+ω2k.q kq+ω3p.q pq}) (A.17) by making the replacements ( α−τ)→α, (ζ−ρ)→ζand (ω−ξ)→ω. The quantity X∆represents the energy circulating in the anti-clockwise di rection, i.e., X∆flows along p→k→ q→p[see Fig. 3 in Section IVB]. We will now denote the circulatin g transfer along p→kbyX(k|p|q), transfer alongk→qbyX(q|k|p) and so on for the circulating transfer between each pair of m odes. The above X∆is the circulating transfer from ptok, i.e.,X(k|p|q|)≡X∆. Then by symmetry the circulating transfer from qtokcan be written as X(k|q|p) =Re([k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]{α0+α1k.q kq+α2k.p kp+α3p.q pq}+ [k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]{ζ0+ζ1k.q kq+ζ2k.p kp+ζ3p.q pq}+ [q.u(k)][u(p).u(q)]{ω0+ω1k.q kq+ω2k.p kp+ω3p.q pq}), (A.18) and the circulating transfer from ptokis X(p|k|q) =Re([p.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]{α0+α1k.p kp+α2p.q pq+α3k.q kq}+ [p.u(k)][u(p).u(q)]{ζ0+ζ1k.p kp+ζ2p.q pq+ζ3k.q kq}+ [k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]{ω0+ω1k.p kp+ω2p.q pq+ω3k.q kq}) (A.19) From Fig. 3, X(k|p|q) flows along the anti-clockwise direction while X(k|q|p) andX(p|k|q) flows along the clockwise direction. The former should therefore be equal and opposit e to the latter two transfers, i.e., X(k|p|q) +X(k|q|p) = 0, (A.20) and 27X(k|p|q) +X(p|k|q) = 0. (A.21) Substitution of expressions X(k|p|q),X(k|q|p),X(p|k|q) [Eqs. (A.17)-(A.19)] into the first of these two relationsh ips yields [k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]{(α0+ζ0) + (α1+ζ2)k.p kp+ (α2+ζ1)k.q kq+ (α3+ζ3)p.q pq} [k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]{(ζ0+α0) + (ζ1+α2)k.p kp+ (ζ2+α1)k.q kq+ (ζ3+α3)p.q pq} [p.u(k)][u(p).u(q)]{(ω1−ω2)k.p kp+ (ω2−ω1)k.q kq}= 0, (A.22) and [k.u(q)][u(k).u(p)]{(α2−α3)k.q kq+ (α3−α2)p.q pq} +[k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)]{(ζ0+ω0) + (ζ1+ω1)k.p kp+ (ζ2+ω3)k.q kq+ (ζ3+ω2)p.q pq} +[p.u(k)][u(p).u(q)]{(ω0+ζ0) + (ω1+ζ1)k.p kp+ (ω2+ζ3)k.q kq+ (ω3+ζ2)p.q pq}= 0. (A.23) Each of the three terms in the two equations above has a differe nt functional dependence on u(k), u(p), u(q) . If we only rotate u(k)aboutkwithout changing its magnitude then each of the terms will ch ange by a different factor depending on the direction of u(p),u(q) which can be independently chosen. Since the sum of three ter ms should be zero and each term can change a different factor, each of the terms should be individually zero. In addition, this should hold for all wavenumber triads. Therefore each t erm inside the curly bracket should also be individually zero. This condition gives the the following relationships between the constants: α0+ζ0= 0,α1+ζ2= 0,α2+ζ1= 0,α3+ζ3= 0,ω1−ω2= 0 from Eq. (A.22), and ω0+ζ0= 0,α2−α3= 0,ζ1+ω1= 0,ζ2+ω3= 0,ζ3+ω2= 0 from Eq. (A.23). We now consider the following geometry - the wavenumber tria d form an isosceles triangle with |p|=|q|, and the Fourier modes u(p) andu(q) are perpendicular to the plane of k, p, q and are equal in magnitude. For this geometry the clockwise and the anti-clockwise direction ar e equivalent. There is no preferred direction along which the circulating transfer may flow. Therefore, for the geomet ry shown the circulating transfer should be zero. We may now write the circulating transfer [Eq. (A.17)] for this geo metry as X=Re([p.u(k)][u(p).u(q)]{(ω1+ω2)k.p kp+ω3p.q pq+a}) 28= 0 (A.24) Withu(p)andu(q)fixed perpendicular to the plane of the triad, X should be zero for all wavenumber triads which form an isosceles triangle. For Xto be zero for every such geometry, each term inside the curly bracket should be equated to zero giving the additional relationships: ω1=−ω2,ω3= 0,ω0= 0. We have obtained 17 relationships between the constants α,ζ, etc. These equations may be solved to get the values of all these constants. It can be verified that the only solution of these equations is α’s= 0,ζ’s= 0,ω’s= 0, a=b=c= 0. Therefore we get X= 0. It follows that the mode-to-mode transfer R/uu=S/uu. We have thus determined the mode-to-mode transfer. The proo f used rotational invariance, galilean invariance, finiteness of mode-to-mode transfer, and symmetry of X with r espect to k,p,q,u(k),u(p),u(q). However, in the series we have taken only linear terms in k.p,k.u(p),u(k).u(p). A complete proof containing all orders of terms is beyond the scope of this thesis. It may be possible to obtain a completely general proof by finding some symmetries which we have ignored in our proof. Otherwise a novel approac h may be required. 2.X∆in MHD turbulence The circulating transfer between the velocity modes in MHD c an also be shown to be equal to zero to linear order terms in k.p,k.u(p),u(k).u(p) . The arguments leading to this are nearly the same as that fo r the fluid case. However, we additionally need to show that the general expre ssion for the circulating transfer X∆for MHD should not contain b(k), b(p), b(q) and can also be given by Eq. (A.1) In the previous section we showed that each term in X∆should depend on u(k), u(p), u(q) — this followed from the fundamentally three-mode feature of the interactions. The expression for the combined energy transfer to u(k) fromu(p) andu(q) is identical for the fluid and for the MHD case. Hence, in the ca se of MHD also, each term in the circulating transfer between the velocity modes should be dependent on u(k), u(p) , andu(q). Thus, the general expression for the circulating transfer between the veloci ty modes in MHD is the same as that for Fluid turbulence. The rest of the arguments leading to X∆= 0 in MHD are identical to those in Section A1. 29APPENDIX B: DERIVATION OF CIRCULATING TRANSFER BETWEEN THE MAGNETIC MODES IN A TRIAD In Section VII B we had shown that the mode-to-mode transfer f romb(p)tob(k)can be written as R/bb=S/bb+Y∆, where S/bbgiven by Eq. (49) is the effective transfer between the modes a ndY∆is the circulating transfer. In this section we will derive the expression for the circulating tr ansferY∆. The derivation for Y∆is similar to the derivation ofX∆for fluid turbulence given in Appendix A. Since the mode-to-mode transfer is a scalar, the circulatin g transferY∆will also be a scalar with a dependence on the wavenumbers k, p, q and the Fourier coefficients u(k), u(p), u(q), b(k), b(p), b(q) . It should be linear in k, porqand cubic in the Fourier coefficients u(k), u(p), u(q), b(k), b(p), b(q) for dimensional reasons. The most general form of Y∆that satisfies these properties can be written as Y∆=Y(1) ∆+Y(2) ∆+Y(3) ∆+Y(4) ∆(B.1) where Y(1) ∆=Re([k.u(q)]{[u(k).b(k)]...+ [u(k).b(p)]...+ [u(k).b(q)]...+ [u(p).b(k)]...+ [u(p).b(p)]...+ [u(p).b(q)]...+ {[u(q).b(k)]...+ [u(q).b(p)]...+ [u(q).b(q)]...}+ [k.u(p)]{[u(k).b(k)]...+....+ [u(k).b(q)]...+....+ [u(q).b(k)]...+....+ [u(q).b(q)]...}+ [p.u(k)]{[u(k).b(k)]...+....+ [u(p).b(q)]...+....+ [u(q).b(p)]...+....+ [u(q).b(q)]...}) (B.2) Y(2) ∆=Re([k.u(q)]{[b(k).b(k)] + [b(k).b(p)]α+ [b(k).b(q)]...+ [b(p).b(p)] + [b(p).b(q)]...+ [b(q).b(q)]...}+ [k.u(p)]{[b(k).b(k)]...+....+ [b(k).b(q)]β+....+ [b(q).b(q)]...}+ [p.u(k)]{[b(k).b(k)]...+....+ [b(p).b(q)]γ+....+ [b(q).b(q)]...}) (B.3) Y(3) ∆=Re([k.b(q)]{[u(k).b(k)]...+ [u(k).b(p)]δ+ [u(k).b(q)]...+ 30[u(p).b(k)]η+ [u(p).b(p)]...+ [u(p).b(q)]...+ {[u(q).b(k)]...+ [u(q).b(p)]...+ [u(q).b(q)]...}+ [k.b(p)]{[u(k).b(k)]...+....+ [u(k).b(q)]µ+....+ [u(q).b(k)]ν+....+ [u(q).b(q)]...}+ [p.b(k)]{[u(k).b(k)]...+....+ [u(p).b(q)]ψ+....+ [u(q).b(p)]χ+ [u(q).b(q)]...}) (B.4) Y(4) ∆=Re([k.b(q)]{[u(k).u(k)]...+ [u(k).u(p)]θ+ [u(k).u(q)]...+ [u(p).u(p)]...+ [u(p).u(q)]...+ [u(q).u(q)]...}+ {[u(q).b(k)]...+ [u(q).b(p)]...+ [u(q).b(q)]...}+ [k.b(p)]{[u(k).u(k)]...+ [u(k).u(q)]φ+....+ [u(q).u(q)]...}+ [p.b(k)]{[u(k).u(k)]...+ [u(p).u(q)]ξ+....+ [u(q).u(q)]...]) (B.5) Following Appendix A we consider explicitly only the real pa rt, which is denoted by Rein the above equations. If we take a linear combination of the real and the imaginary p arts instead, the derivation and the conclusions regardingY∆will not change. In addition, terms of the Re[k.u(q)]Re[u(k).u(p)],Re[k.u(q)]Re[u(k).b(p)], etc. are not included as they violate galilean invariance - we had exp lained this in Appendix A in context of X∆. The three dots ‘...’ in the above equations in front of some of the terms indicate that a coefficient multiplies each of these terms but which we have not shown explicitly as they do not ent er most of the future discussion. The coefficients α,β, etc. in the above expressions for Y(1) ∆,..Y(4) ∆are non-dimensional functions of the wavenumbers k, p, q and ofu(k), u(p), u(q), b(k, b(p), b(q) . To determine Y∆we should now determine these coefficients. Note that besides the terms of the kind [ k.u(q)]{...},[k.u(p)]{...},[p.u(k)]{...}in Eqs. (B.2)-( B.5), there are also terms of the kind [p.u(q)]{...},[q.u(p)]{...},[q.u(k)]{...}. However, using the incompressibility constraints k.u(k) =0and the constraint k+p+q=0, we have absorbed the latter three terms into the former ones . Now we will impose a few restrictions on the form of Y∆. The interactions between the magnetic modes fundamentally involve three-modes — the combined energy transfer to a magnetic mode, say b(k), depends on the Fourier coefficients at all three wavenumbers (k, p, q). For example, the combined energy transfer to b(k) fromb(p) andb(q), given by Sbb(k|p,q) = 31−Re(i[k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)] +i[k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]), depends on u(p),u(q),b(p),b(q), andb(k). The mode-to- mode transfer should not break the fundamentally three-mod e feature of these interactions, i.e., the mode-to-mode transfer should have Fourier coefficients from all wavenumbe rsk,p,q. Hence we will drop all those terms from Y(1) ∆ toY(4) ∆which are independent of atleast one of the wavenumbers k,p,q. Then, we get Y(1) ∆=Re([k.u(q)]{[u(k).b(p)]...+ [u(p).b(k)]...}+[k.u(p)]{[u(k).b(q)]...+ [u(q).b(k)]...}+ [p.u(k)]{[u(p).b(q)]...+ [u(q).b(p)]...}) (B.6) Y(2) ∆=Re([k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]α+ [k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]β+ [p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]γ) (B.7) Y(3) ∆=Re([k.b(q)]{[u(k).b(p)]δ+ [u(p).b(k)]η}+ [k.b(p)]{[u(k).b(q)]µ+ [u(q).b(k)]ν}+ [p.b(k)]{[u(p).b(q)]ψ+ [u(q).b(p)]χ}) (B.8) Y(4) ∆=Re([k.b(q)][u(k).u(p)]θ+ [k.b(p)][u(k).u(q)]φ+ [p.b(k)][u(k).u(k)]...) (B.9) We put the following additional restriction on the form of Y∆. If none of the magnetic modes in the triad are gaining/losing energy to the other two modes, i.e., if the co mbined energy transfer to each one of them is equal to zero, then even the circulating transfer should be equal to z ero. We observe the following additional feature of the interactions. The combined energy transfer to every magnet ic mode in the triad from the other two magnetic modes is equal to zero, if any two of b(k),b(p),b(q) are zero (see Eq. (36). The mode-to-mode transfer should al so respect this feature of the interactions, i.e., the circulating tra nsfer should be zero if {b(k), b(p)=0 }, or{b(k), b(q)=0 }, or{b(p), b(q)=0 }. Now, let us put b(k)=0, b(p)=0 inY(1) ∆toY(4) ∆. It can easily shown that Y∆will be zero, for arbitrary values u’s and b’s, only if the all coefficients in Y(1) ∆andY(4) ∆are themselves equal to zero. Hence we drop Y(1) ∆andY(4) ∆fromY∆[Eq. (B.1)]. We get, Y∆=Y(2) ∆+Y(3) ∆ (B.10) and 32Y(2) ∆=Re([k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]α+ [k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]β+ [p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]γ) (B.11) Y(3) ∆=Re([k.b(q)]{[u(k).b(p)]δ+ [u(p).b(k)]η}+ [k.b(p)]{[u(k).b(q)]µ+ [u(q).b(k)]ν}+ [p.b(k)]{[u(p).b(q)]ψ+ [u(q).b(p)]χ}) (B.12) In Appendix A we had considered the derivation of circulatin g transferX∆between the velocity modes. By imposing the condition of finiteness of the circulating transfer we ha d concluded that the coefficients should be independent of the magnitude of the wavenumbers and the Fourier coefficien tsu(k), etc. On imposing the constraint that Y∆ should be finite and following the reasoning in Appendix A, we can conclude that the coefficients α,β, etc. should be independent of the magnitude of the wavenumbers and of the Fourier coefficients of the velocity and the magnetic fields. Therefore, we may write the coefficient α=f[k.p kp,...,k.u(p) k|u(p)|,k.b(p) k|b(p)|,...,u(k).u(p) |u(k)||u(p)|,b(k).b(p) |b(k)||b(p)|,...,u(k).b(p) |u(k)||b(p)|,...]. The other coefficients can also be written in the same manner. We will now write the coefficients α,β, etc. as α=α(0)+α(1)+α(2)+α(3)+α(4), (B.13) whereα(0)is a constant, and α(1)=α(1) 1k.p kp+α(1) 2k.q kq+α(1) 3p.q pq, (B.14) α(2)=α(2) 1k.u(p) k|u(p)|+α(2) 2k.u(q) k|u(q)|+α(2) 3p.u(k) p|u(k)|+α(2) 4p.u(q) p|u(q)|+α(2) 5q.u(k) q|u(k)|+α(2) 6q.u(p) q|u(p)|+ α(2) 7k.b(p) k|b(p)|+...+α(2) 12q.b(p) q|b(p)|, (B.15) α(3)=α(3) 1u(k).u(p) |u(k)||u(p)|+α(3) 2u(k).u(q) |u(k)||u(q)|+α(3) 3u(p).u(q) |u(p)||u(q)|+ α(3) 4b(k).b(p) |b(k)||b(p)|+α(3) 5b(k).b(q) |b(k)||b(q)|+α(3) 6b(p).b(q) |b(p)||b(q)|+ α(3) 7u(k).b(k) |u(k)||b(k)|+α(3) 8u(k).b(p) |u(k)||b(p)|+...+α(3) 15u(q).b(p) |u(q)||b(p)|. (B.16) whereα(1) 1,α(1) 2,α(2) 1, etc. are all unknown constants. The quantities α(1),α(2),α(3)are ‘linear’ in the scalars of the type k.p/kp,k.u(p)/k|u(p)|,k.b(p)/k|b(p)|,u(k).u(p)/|u(k)||u(p)|,b(k).b(p)/|b(k)||b(p)|, and 33u(k).b(p)/|u(k)||b(p)|. The quantity α(4)contains higher order terms in these scalars like ( k.p)2/k2p2, [k.u(p)]2/k2([u(p).u(p)], etc. All the other coefficients ζ,γ,ω, etc. in Eqs. (B.11)-(B.12) can be similarly divided into linear and non-linear terms. The mode-to-mode transfer should be invariant under a galil ean transformation. In Appendix A, we had given the transformation rules for the scalars of the type k.p,k.u(p) ,u(k).u(p) and for a combination of these like [k.u(p)][u(k).u(q)] . For the present case we also need to consider the transforma tion properties of the magnetic field. MHD equations hold for low velocities and only quantit ies upto the order of v/care included in the equations. Under this approximation the magnetic fields are equal in the two frames SandS′with a relative velocity U0. Then, the Fourier coefficient b(k) in the frame Sandb′(k) in the frame S′are related as b′(k) =b(k)expi(k.U0)t(B.17) This differs from the galilean transformation of u(k)by the term U0δ(k) only. Using the above relationship between between b(k) andb′(k) the transformation rules for k.b(q) ,b(k).b(p) ,u(k).b(p) are k′.b′(q′) =k.b(q) expi(q.U0)t, (B.18) b′(k′).b′(p′) =b(k).b(p) expi(k+p).U0t, (B.19) u′(k′).b′(p′) =u(k).b(p) expi(k+p).U0t. (B.20) These scalars are not galilean invariant (in Appendix A, we h ad likewise shown that the scalars of the type k.u(p) , u(k).u(p) are not galilean invariant). It follows that α(2),β(2), etc.,α(3),β(3), etc. are not invariant under a galilean transformation. To preserve the galilean invariance of Y∆, the coefficients α(2),α(3),β(2),β(3), and other such coefficients should be dropped from Eq. (B.13). The nonlinear quantityα(4),β(4), etc. can be constructed in a galilean invariant form. Even then we will drop this term. We had also dropped this term from the expression for X∆in Appendix A. Our derivation for Y∆, like the derivation of X∆in Appendix A, is is thus valid only upto the linear orders. After dropping the coefficients α(2),α(3),α(4)and other coefficients of this type, Eq. (B.13) reduces to α=α(0)+α(1)(B.21) Using Eqs. (B.21) and (B.14) we can now write Y(2) ∆andY(3) ∆in Eqs. (B.11)-(B.12) as 34Y(2) ∆=Re([k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{α(0)+α1k.p kp+α2k.q kq+α3p.q pq}+ [k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{β(0)+β1k.p kp+β2k.q kq+β3p.q pq}+ [p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{γ(0)+γ1k.p kp+γ2k.q kq+γ3p.q pq}) (B.22) Y(3) ∆=Re( [k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{δ(0)+δ1k.p kp+δ2k.q kq+δ3p.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{η(0)+η1k.p kp+η2k.q kq+η3p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{µ(0)+µ1k.p kp+µ2k.q kq+µ3p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{ν(0)+ν1k.p kp+ν2k.q kq+ν3p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{φ(0)+φ1k.p kp+φ2k.q kq+φ3p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{χ(0)+χ1k.p kp+χ2k.q kq+χ3p.q pq}) (B.23) where the superscript ‘1’ has been dropped from α(1),α(2), etc. The quantity Y∆=Y(2) ∆+Y(3) ∆represents the energy circulating in the anti-clockwise di rection, i.e. Y∆flows along p→k→q→p[see Fig. 8 in Section VII B]. We will now denote the circulati ng transfer along p→kbyY∆(k|p|q), transfer along k→qbyY∆(q|k|p) and so on for the circulating transfer between each pair of m odes. We take Y∆=Y(2) ∆+Y(3) ∆from Eqs. (B.22)-(B.23) to be the circulating transfer from ptok, i.e.,Y∆(k|p|q|)≡Y∆. In the same manner Y∆(k|q|p)) =Y(2) ∆(k|q|p) +Y(3) ∆(k|q|p) can be written as Y(2) ∆(k|q|p) =Re([k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{α(0)+α1k.q kq+α2k.p kp+α3p.q pq}+ [k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{β(0)+β1k.q kq+β2k.p kp+β3p.q pq}+ [q.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{γ(0)+γ1k.q kq+γ2k.p kp+γ3p.q pq}) (B.24) and Y(3) ∆(k|q|p) =Re( [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{δ(0)+δ1k.q kq+δ2k.p kp+δ3p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{η(0)+η1k.q kq+η2k.p kp+η3p.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{µ(0)+µ1k.q kq+µ2k.p kp+µ3p.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{ν(0)+ν1k.q kq+ν2k.p kp+ν3p.q pq}+ [q.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{φ(0)+φ1k.q kq+φ2k.p kp+φ3p.q pq}+ [q.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{χ(0)+χ1k.q kq+χ2k.p kp+χ3p.q pq}) (B.25) 35and the circulating transfer from ptok,Y∆(p|k|q)) =Y(2) ∆(p|k|q) +Y(3) ∆(p|k|q) can be written as Y(2) ∆(p|k|q) =Re([p.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{α(0)+α1k.p kp+α2p.q pq+α3k.q kq}+ [p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{β(0)+β1k.p kp+β2p.q pq+β3k.q kq}+ [k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{γ(0)+γ1k.p kp+γ2p.q kq+γ3k.q kq}) (B.26) Y(3) ∆(p|k|q) =Re( [p.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{δ(0)+δ1k.p kp+δ2p.q pq+δ3k.q kq}+ [p.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{η(0)+η1k.p kp+η2p.q pq+η3k.q kq}+ [p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{µ(0)+µ1k.p kp+µ2p.q pq+µ3k.q kq}+ [p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{ν(0)+ν1k.p kp+ν2p.q pq+ν3k.q kq}+ [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{φ(0)+φ1k.p kp+φ2p.q pq+φ3k.q kq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{χ(0)+χ1k.p kp+χ2p.q pq+χ3k.q kq}) (B.27) Y∆(k|p|q) flows along the anti-clockwise direction while Y∆(k|q|p) andY∆(p|k|q) flow along the clockwise direction. The former should therefore be equal and opposite to the latt er two transfers, i.e., Y∆(k|p|q) +Y∆(k|q|p) = 0, (B.28) and Y∆(k|p|q) +Y∆(p|k|q) = 0. (B.29) Replacing the expression for Y∆(k|p|q) from Eqs. (B.22)-(B.23) and for Y∆(k|q|p) from Eqs. (B.24)-(B.25) into Eq. (B.28) we get [k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{(α(0)+β(0)) + (α1+β2)k.p kp+ (α2+β1)k.q kq+ (α3+β3p.q pq}+ [k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{(β(0)+α(0)) + (β1+α2)k.p kp+ (β2+α1k.q kq+β3+α3p.q pq}+ [p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{(γ1−γ2)k.p kp+ (γ2−γ1)k.q kq+ [k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{(δ(0)+ν(0)) + (δ1+µ2)k.p kp+ (δ2+µ1)k.q kq+ (δ3+µ3)p.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{(η(0)+ν(0))(η1+ν2)k.p kp+ (η2+ν1)k.q kq+ (η3+ν3)p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{(µ(0)+δ(0)) + (µ1+δ2)k.p kp+ (µ2+δ1)k.q kq+ (µ3+δ3)p.q pq}+ 36[k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{(ν(0)+η(0)) + (ν1+η2)k.p kp+ (ν2+η1)k.q kq+ (ν3+η3)p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{(φ(0)−χ(0)) + (φ1−χ2)k.p kp+ (φ2−χ1)k.q kq+ (φ3−χ3)p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{(χ(0)−φ(0)) + (χ1−φ2)k.p kp+ (χ2−φ1)k.q kq+ (χ3−φ3)p.q pq}= 0 (B.30) and replacing the expression for Y∆(k|p|q) andY∆(p|k|q) from Eqs. (B.26)-(B.27) into Eq.(B.29) we get [k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{(α2−α3)k.q kq+ (α3−α2)p.q pq}+ [k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{(β(0)+γ(0)) + (β1+γ2)k.p kp+ (β2+γ3k.q kq+β3+γ2p.q pq}+ [p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{(γ(0)+β(0)) + (γ1+β1)k.p kp+ (γ2+β3)k.q kq+ (γ3+β3)p.q pq+ [k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{(δ(0)−η(0)) + (δ1−η1)k.p kp+ (δ2−η3)k.q kq+ (δ3−η2)p.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{(η(0)−δ(0)) + (η1−δ1)k.p kp+ (η2−δ3)k.q kq+ (η3−δ2)p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{(µ(0)+φ(0)) + (µ1+φ1)k.p kp+ (µ2+φ3)k.q kq+ (µ3+φ2)p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{(ν(0)+χ(0)) + (ν1+χ1)k.p kp+ (ν2+χ3)k.q kq+ (ν3+χ2)p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{(φ(0)+µ(0)) + (φ1+µ1)k.p kp+ (φ2+µ3)k.q kq+ (φ3+µ2)p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{(χ(0)+ν(0)) + (χ1+ν1)k.p kp+ (χ2+ν3)k.q kq+ (χ3+ν2)p.q pq}= 0 (B.31) Since each term in the above equation has a different function al dependence on u(k), u(p), u(q), b(k), b(p), b(q) , each term should be individually zero. It follows that the co nstants in the above equations should satisfy the following relationships : from Eq. (B.30) we get α(0)+β(0)= 0,α1+β2= 0,α2+β1= 0,α3+β3= 0,γ1−γ2= 0δ(0)+µ(0)= 0,δ1+µ2= 0,δ2+µ1= 0,δ3+µ3= 0,η(0)+ν(0)= 0,η1+ν2= 0,η2+ν1= 0,η3+ν3= 0,φ(0)−χ(0)= 0,φ1−χ2= 0,φ2−χ1= 0,φ3−χ3= 0,and from Eq. (B.31) we get α2−α3= 0,β(0)+γ(0)= 0,β1+γ1= 0,β2+γ3= 0,β3+γ2= 0,δ(0)−η(0)= 0,δ1−η1= 0,δ2−η3= 0,δ3−η2= 0,µ(0)+φ(0)= 0,µ1+φ1= 0,µ2+φ3= 0,µ3+φ2= 0,ν(0)+χ(0)= 0,ν2+χ3= 0,µ3+φ2= 0. The above relationships can be arranged into the following g roups: {α(0)=−β(0)=γ(0)},{δ(0)=−µ(0)=φ(0)= η(0)=−ν(0)=χ(0)},{α1=−β2=γ3},{α2=−β1=γ1=γ2=α3=−β3},{δ1=−µ2=φ3=χ3=−ν2=η1}, {δ2=−µ1=φ1=χ2=−ν3=η3},{δ3=−µ3=φ2=χ1=−ν1=η2}. Let us now consider a triad with |p|=|q|,k.p=k.qand with the Fourier modes u(p),u(q),b(p),b(q) perpen- 37dicular to the plane formed by this triad. We argued in Append ix A that the circulating transfer should vanish for such a geometry. For this geometry we can write Y∆from Eq. (B.22) and ( B.23) as Y∆=Re([p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{γ(0)+ (γ1+γ2)k.p kp+γ3p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{φ(0)+ (φ1+φ2)k.p kp+φ3p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{χ(0)+ (χ1+χ2)k.p kp+χ3p.q pq}) = 0 (B.32) The above equality should hold for all triads with |p|=|q|andk.p=k.q . Therefore each term inside the curly brackets should be individually zero. This leads us to the following a dditional relationships between the various constants in the above equation: γ(0)= 0,γ1+γ2= 0,γ3= 0,φ(0)= 0,φ2+φ3= 0,φ1= 0,χ(0)= 0,χ1+χ3= 0,χ2= 0, Similarly, by choosing |k|=|p|, andu(k),u(p),b(k),b(p) perpendicular to the triad plane we get the relationships α(0)= 0,α1= 0,α2+α3= 0,δ(0)= 0,δ1= 0,δ2+δ3= 0,η(0)= 0,η1= 0,η2+η3= 0.and by choosing |k|=|q|, and u(k),u(q),b(k),b(q) perpendicular to the triad plane we get β(0)= 0,β2= 0,β1+β3= 0,µ(0)= 0,µ2= 0,µ1+µ3= 0,ν(0)= 0,ν2= 0,ν1+ν3= 0. Using these relationships the above groups take the followi ng values: {α(0)=−β(0)=γ(0)= 0},{δ(0)= −µ(0)=φ(0)=η(0)=−ν(0)=χ(0)= 0},{α1=−β2=γ3= 0},{α2=−β1=γ1=γ2=α3=−β3= 0}, {δ1=−µ2=φ3=χ3=−ν2=η1= 0},{δ2=−µ1=φ1=χ2=−ν3=η3=−δ3=µ3=−φ2=−χ1=ν1=−η2}. Hence, some of the constants are equal to zero, and all the non -zero constants are related to each other by just one undetermined constant which we will denote by′C′, i.e.,{δ2=−µ1=...=C} Putting the values of these constants in the expressions for Y(2) ∆andY(3) ∆in Eqs. (B.22)-(B.23) we get Y(2) ∆= 0 (B.33) Y(3) ∆=Re([k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{Ck.q kq−Cp.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{−Ck.q kq+Cp.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{−Ck.p kp+Cp.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{Ck.p kp−Cp.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{Ck.p kp−Ck.q kq}+ [p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{−Ck.p kp+Ck.q kq}) (B.34) with a single undetermined constant. 38For the determination of X∆in Appendix A, the above considerations were sufficient to det ermineX∆. However, in the present case we are still left with one undetermined co nstant. We will now impose the constraint of locality which we state as follows: In the limit k,q→ ∞>>p,Y∆should tend to zero. If Z∆remains finite then the noise, which is always inevitably present in any flow at the smallest scales, would interact directly with the large scales. Moreover, the locality constraint is also necessary in orde r that the circulating transfer is consistent with the effect ive transfer between b(k)andb(q)which goes to zero for in the above limit. Let us take u(k), u(q) to be perpendicular to the plane of the triad. Then we can write Y∆as Y(3) ∆=Re([k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{−Ck.p kp+Cp.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{Ck.p kp−Cp.q pq}) (B.35) which may be written in terms of the angles of the triangle for med by k, p, q [Fig. B.1] as Y(3) ∆=Re(/bracketleftBig ˆk.b(p)/bracketrightBig [u(k).b(q)]{−Ckcos(ψ)−Ckcos(θ)}+ /bracketleftBig ˆk.b(p)/bracketrightBig [u(q).b(k)]{Ckcos(ψ) +Ckcos(θ)}) (B.36) We now take the limit k,q→ ∞, keepingψandpconstant. In this limit φ→0. Making use of the relationships θ=π−ψ−φ,k/sinθ=p/sinφ, and taking the limit φ→0, we get for Y∆→/bracketleftBig ˆk.b(p)/bracketrightBig [u(k).b(q)]{−Cpsin2(ψ)}+ /bracketleftBig ˆk.b(p)/bracketrightBig [u(q).b(k)]{Cpsin2(ψ)}. However, in this limit Y∆should tend to zero in order to satisfy locality. From this constraint we get C= 0. Putting the value of C in Eq. (B.34) gives Y(3) ∆= 0. Therefore we get Y∆= 0. It follows that the mode-to-mode transfer R/bb=S/bb. In the above proof we used rotational invariance, galilean i nvariance, finiteness of mode-to-mode transfer, the symmetry of Y∆with respect to k, p, q, u(k), u(p), u(q), b(k), b(p), b(q) , and the assumption that the circulating transfer should vanish if two of the wavenumber s approach infinity. This proof is valid only upto linear orders, as explained earlier in this appendix. A completely general proof without taking recourse to the linearity assumption is lacking at present. 39APPENDIX C: DERIVATION OF THE CIRCULATING TRANSFER BETWEEN VELOCITY MODES AND MAGNETIC MODES IN A TRIAD In Section VII C we had shown that the energy transfer from u(p)tob(k)in the triad ( k, p, q ) can be expressed asR/bu(k|p|q) =S/bu(k|p|q) +Z∆.S/bu(k|p|q) is given by Eq. (76) of Section VII C was interpreted as the eff ective transfer from u(p) tob(k) andZ∆was interpreted as a circulating transfer between the veloc ity and magnetic modes belonging to a triad. We will follow the approach of App endix A and Appendix B to determine Z∆in this Appendix. We will impose the following conditions on Z∆. It should not violate the fundamentally triad nature of the interactions, it should be finite, rotationally invaria nt, galilean invariant, and should vanish if k/p→ ∞. The circulating transfer Z∆is a scalar with a dependence on atmost k, p, q, u(k), u(p), u(q), b(k), b(p), b(q) . We know from Appendix B that such a function can be expressed i n the form given by Eqs. (B.1)-(B.5) of Appendix B. The interactions between the velocity and the magnetic mo des are fundamentally three-mode, i.e., each term in the expression for combined energy transfer to a velocity or a magnetic mode depends on all the three wavenumbers (k, p, q ). the combined energy transfer to any of the velocity or the m agnetic modes in the triad. Z∆should not violate this fundamental nature of the interactions. Hence we should drop all those terms from Eqs. (B.1)-(B.5) which are independent of atleast one of the modes and then we get Eqs . (B.6)-(B.9) for Z∆. The combined energy transfer to velocity and magnetic modes in the triad are zero if {b(k), b(p) = 0 },{b(k), b(q) = 0 }, or{b(p), b(q) = 0}. The terms which are non-vanishing if one of the above set of F ourier coefficients are zero will be dropped from Eqs. (B.6)-(B.9), giving Eqs. (B.10)-(B.12) In Appendix B a lso we had imposed identical constraints on Eqs. (B.1)- (B.5) to get Eqs. (B.10)-(B.12). The dimensionless coefficie nts in these equations are k, p, q, u(k), u(p), u(q), b(k), b(p), b(q) dependent and we will now attempt to determine these. In Appendix B we had considered the consequences of finitenes s and galilean invariance on Eqs. (B.10)-(B.12) of Appendix B. We will briefly summarise the conclusions now. To ensure the finiteness and galilean invariance of Eqs. (B.10)-(B.12) the dimensionless coefficients in thes e equations should be independent of the magnitudes of the wavenumbers and the Fourier coefficients. Then each coe fficient in the equations can be written as α= α(0)+α(1)+α(2)+α(3)+α(4)whereα(0)is a constant, α(1),α(2),α(3)defined in Eqs. (B.14)-(B.16) of Appendix B. are linear in terms of the kind k.p,k.u(p) ,u(k).u(p) respectively, and α(4)is nonlinear in these terms. α(2), andα(3)are not galilean invariant and would therefore lead to the no n-invariance of Eqs. (B.14)-(B.16) of Appendix B. Hence,α(2)andα(3)should not be included in α. In Appendix B we had also dropped α(4). Therefore, we get 40α=α(0)+α(1). Following Appendix B we will now write Z∆[given by Eqs. (B.10)-(B.12) in Appendix B] Zbu ∆=Zbu 2∆+Zbu 3∆ (C.1) where Zbu 2∆(k|p|q) =Re([k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{α(0)+α(1) 1k.p kp+α(1) 2k.q kq+α(1) 3p.q pq}+ [k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{β(0)+β(1) 1k.p kp+β(1) 2k.q kq+β(1) 3p.q pq}+ [p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{γ(0)+γ(1) 1k.p kp+γ(1) 2k.q kq+γ(1) 3p.q pq}) (C.2) Zbu 3∆(k|p|q) =Re( [k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{δ(0)+δ(1) 1k.p kp+δ(1) 2k.q kq+δ(1) 3p.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{η(0)+η(1) 1k.p kp+η(1) 2k.q kq+η(1) 3p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{µ(0)+µ(1) 1k.p kp+µ(1) 2k.q kq+µ(1) 3p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{ν(0)+ν(1) 1k.p kp+ν(1) 2k.q kq+ν(1) 3p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{φ(0)+φ(1) 1k.p kp+φ(1) 2k.q kq+φ(1) 3p.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{χ(0)+χ(1) 1k.p kp+χ(1) 2k.q kq+χ(1) 3p.q pq}) (C.3) The quantities Zbu ∆=Zbu 2∆+Zbu 3∆represent the energy circulating from u(p)→b(k)→u(q)→b(p)...→u(p) [see Fig. 9 in Section VII C]. We will denote the circulating trans fer from u(p)→b(k) byZbu ∆(k|p|q), from b(p)→u(k) byZub ∆(k|p|q) and so on for the circulating transfer between other modes. We takeZbu ∆=Z2∆+buZbu 3∆in Eqs. (C.2)- ( C.3) to be the circulating transfer from u(p)→b(k), i.e.,Zbu ∆(k|p|q)≡Z∆. Then by symmetry the circulating transfer from u(q)tob(k)can be written as Zbu ∆(k|q|p) =Zbu 2∆(k|q|p) +Zbu 3∆(k|q|p) (C.4) Zbu 2∆(k|q|p) =Re([k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{α(0)+α1k.q kq+α2k.p kp+α3p.q pq}+ [k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{β(0)+β1k.q kq+β2k.p kp+β3p.q pq}+ [q.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{γ(0)+γ1k.q kq+γ2k.p kp+γ3p.q pq}) (C.5) Zbu 3∆(k|q|p) =Re( [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{δ(0)+δ1k.q kq+δ2k.p kp+δ3p.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{η(0)+η1k.q kq+η2k.p kp+η3p.q pq}+ 41[k.b(q)][u(q).b(k)]{µ(0)+µ1k.q kq+µ2k.p kp+µ3p.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(k).b(q)]{ν(0)+ν1k.q kq+ν2k.p kp+ν3p.q pq}+ [q.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{φ(0)+φ1k.q kq+φ2k.p kp+φ3p.q pq}+ [q.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{χ(0)+χ1k.q kq+χ2k.p kp+χ3p.q pq}) (C.6) We have dropped the superscript ‘1’ in the above equations. Zbu ∆(k|p|q) andZub ∆(p|k|q) are physically the same transfers, but the former represents the transfer from u(p) tob(k)and the latter represents the same transfer from b(k)tou(p) The former should therefore be equal and opposite in sign to t he latter, i.e., Zbu ∆(k|p|q) +Zub ∆(p|k|q) = 0 (C.7) Zub ∆(p|k|q) is thus given by the negative of Eqs. (C.1)-(C.3). Using the expression for Zub ∆(p|k|q) we can write Zub ∆(k|p|q) to be Zub ∆(k|p|q) =Zub 2∆(k|p|q) +Zub 3∆(k|p|q) (C.8) Zub 2∆(k|p|q) =Re(−[k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{γ(0)+γ1k.p kp+γ2p.q pq+γ3k.q kq} + [k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{α(0)+α1k.p kp+α2p.q pq+α3k.q kq} −[p.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{β(0)+β1k.p kp+β2p.q pq+β3k.q kq}) (C.9) Zub 3∆(k|p|q) =Re(−[k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{φ(0)+φ1k.p kp+φ2p.q pq+φ3k.q kq} −[k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{χ(0)+χ1k.p kp+χ2p.q pq+χ3k.q kq} + [k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{δ(0)+δ1k.p kp+δ2p.q pq+δ3k.q kq} + [k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{η(0)+η1k.p kp+η2p.q pq+η3k.q kq} −[p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{µ(0)+µ1k.p kp+µ2p.q pq+µ3k.q kq} −[p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{ν(0)+ν1k.p kp+ν2p.q pq+ν3k.q kq}) (C.10) andZub ∆(k|q|p) is given by 42Zub ∆(k|q|p) =Zub 2∆(k|q|p) +Zub 3∆(k|q|p) (C.11) Zub 2∆(k|q|p) =Re(−[k.u(q)][b(k).b(p)]{γ(0)+γ1k.q kq+γ2p.q pq+γ3k.p kp} + [k.u(p)][b(k).b(q)]{α(0)+α1k.q kq+α2p.q pq+α3k.p kp} −[q.u(k)][b(p).b(q)]{β(0)+β1k.q kq+β2p.q pq+β3k.p kp}) (C.12) Zub 3∆(k|q|p) =Re(−[k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{φ(0)+φ1k.q kq+φ2p.q pq+φ3k.p kp} −[k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{χ(0)+χ1k.q kq+χ2p.q pq+χ3k.p kp} + [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{δ(0)+δ1k.q kq+δ2p.q pq+δ3k.p kp} + [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{η(0)+η1k.q kq+η2p.q pq+η3k.p kp} −[q.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{µ(0)+µ1k.q kq+µ2p.q pq+µ3k.p kp} −[q.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{ν(0)+ν1k.q kq+ν2p.q pq+ν3k.p kp}) (C.13) The sum of the circulating transfer to b(k)fromu(p) and from u(q)should be zero, i.e., Zbu ∆(k|p|q) +Zbu ∆(k|q|p) = 0 (C.14) and similarly the sum of the circulating transfer to u(k)fromb(p) and from b(q)should also be equal to zero, i.e., Zub ∆(k|p|q) +Zub ∆(k|q|p) = 0 (C.15) ReplacingZbu ∆(k|p|q) andZbu ∆(k|q|p) from Eqs. (C.1)-(C.3) and Eqs. (C.4)-(C.6) into Eq. (C.14) we get the following relationships between the constants: α,β, etc.α(0)+β(0)= 0,α1+β2= 0,α2+β1= 0,α3+β3= 0,γ1−γ2= 0,δ(0)+µ(0)= 0,δ1+µ2= 0,δ2+µ1= 0,δ3+µ3= 0,η(0)+ν(0)= 0,η1+ν2= 0,η2+ν1= 0,η3+ν3= 0,φ(0)−χ(0)= 0,φ1−χ2= 0,φ2−χ1= 0,φ3−χ3= 0.After replacing Zub ∆(k|p|q) andZub ∆(k|q|p) from Eqs. (C.1)- (C.3) and Eqs. (C.11)-(C.13) into Eq. (C.15) we get the follo wing relationships: α2−α3= 0,β(0)+γ(0)= 0,β1+γ1= 0,β2+γ3= 0,β3+γ2= 0,δ(0)−η(0)= 0,δ1−η1= 0,δ2−η3= 0,δ3−η2= 0,µ(0)+φ(0)= 0,µ1+φ1= 0,µ2+φ3= 0,µ3+φ2= 0,ν(0)+χ(0)= 0,ν2+χ3= 0,µ3+φ2= 0. 43Let us now consider the following geometry: the three wavenu mbers in the triad form an isosceles triangle, and we choose Fourier coefficients at the two wavenumbers of equal le ngths to be perpendicular to k, p, q . We had considered this kind of geometry in Appendix A and Appendix B. We had argu ed that because of the symmetry between the two wavenumbers of equal length, the circulating transfer s hould vanish for this geometry. This constraint had given us an additional set of relationships between the constants inY∆.Zbu ∆should also be equal to zero for this geometry. SinceZbu ∆andY∆have the same functional form, given by Eq. (B.22)-(B.23) of Appendix B and Eq. (C.1)-(C.3) of this appendix respectively, hence imposition of this const raint onZbu ∆would give the same set of relationships, i.e., γ(0)= 0,γ1+γ2= 0,γ3= 0,φ(0)= 0,φ2+φ3= 0,φ1= 0,χ(0)= 0,χ1+χ3= 0,χ2= 0,α(0)= 0,α1= 0,α2+α3= 0,δ(0)= 0,δ1= 0,δ2+δ3= 0,η(0)= 0,η1= 0,η2+η3= 0,β(0)= 0,β2= 0,β1+β3= 0,µ(0)= 0,µ2= 0,µ1+µ3= 0,ν(0)= 0,ν2= 0,ν1+ν3= 0. The above relationships between the constants in Eqs. (C.2) -(C.3) are identical to the relationships between the constants in Eqs. (B.22)-(B.23) of Appendix B. We know from A ppendix B that these relationships can be expressed more clearly as follows: {α(0)=−β(0)=γ(0)= 0},{δ(0)=−µ(0)=φ(0)=η(0)=−ν(0)=χ(0)= 0},{α1=−β2= γ3= 0},{α2=−β1=γ1=γ2=α3=−β3= 0},{δ1=−µ2=φ3=χ3=−ν2=η1= 0},{δ2=−µ1=φ1=χ2= −ν3=η3=−δ3=µ3=−φ2=−χ1=ν1=−η2}. There is just one undetermined constant which we will denot e by ‘C’, i.e., {δ2=−µ1=...=C}. Expressing Zbu ∆[Eqs. (C.2)-(C.3)] in terms of this single constant, we get Z2∆= 0 (C.16) Z3∆=Re( [k.b(q)][u(k).b(p)]{Ck.q kq−Cp.q pq}+ [k.b(q)][u(p).b(k)]{−Ck.q kq+Cp.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(k).b(q)]{−Ck.p kp+Cp.q pq}+ [k.b(p)][u(q).b(k)]{Ck.p kp+−Cp.q pq}+ [p.b(k)][u(p).b(q)]{Ck.p kp−Ck.q kq}+ [p.b(k)][u(q).b(p)]{−Ck.p kp+Ck.q kq}) (C.17) which is the same as the expression for for Y∆in Eqs. (B.33)-(B.34) of Appendix B. Ifk/pandq/p→ ∞, while pis kept constant the circulating transfer Z∆should tend to zero. This constraint was also applied on the circulating transfer between magnetic m odes,Y∆in Appendix B. We had shown that the constant C= 0 for this constraint to be satisfied. Putting C= 0 in Eqs. (C.16)-(C.17) we get Zbu ∆=Zbu 2∆+Zbu 3∆equal to zero. The circulating transfer between the velocity and the magne tic modes in the triad is equal to zero and the mode- to-mode transfer R/bu(k|p|q) =S/bu(k|p|q). 44The derivation of Zbu ∆, however took the coefficients to be linear. A completely gene ral derivation for Zbu ∆will require imposition of additional symmetry and invariance o r some other constraints, which we have ignored here. 45APPENDIX D: EQUIVALENCE OF KRAICHNAN’S FORMULA AND OUR FORM ULA FOR THE KINETIC ENERGY FLUX In this appendix we will show that the flux formula (30) based o n the effective mode-to-mode transfer is equivalent to Eq. (28) derived by Kraichnan. Kraichnan [15] showed that the kinetic energy flux in terms of the combined energy transfer Suugiven by Πu< u>(K) =−/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay p1 2Suu(k|p,q) (D.1) Our formula for flux in terms of the effective mode-to-mode tra nsferS/uuis given by Πu< u>(K) =−/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|>KS/uu(k|p|q). (D.2) The equation ( D.1) can be written in terms of S/’s as follows: Πu< u>(K) =/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay p1 2(S/uu(k|p|q) +S/uu(k|q|p)) (D.3) which can be further split up as Πu< u>(K) = /summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|,|q|<K1 2(S/uu(k|p|q) +S/uu(k|q|p)) +/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|,|q|>K1 2(S/uu(k|p|q) +S/uu(k|q|p)) +/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|<K, |q|>K1 2(S/uu(k|p|q) +S/uu(k|q|p)) +/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|>K, |q|<K1 2(S/uu(k|p|q) +S/uu(k|q|p)) (D.4) These transfers are shown in Fig. D.1. Making use of symmetri es between k,p,qin the summations we get the following relationships. Since p, qare interchangeable we get /summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|,|q|>KS/uu(k|p|q) =/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|,|q|>KS/uu(k|q|p), (D.5) sincek, pare interchangeable, /summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|<K, |q|>KS/uu(k|p|q) =/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|<K, |q|>KS/uu(p|k|q), (D.6) 46sincek, qare interchangeable, /summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |q|<K, |p|>KS/uu(k|q|p) =/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |q|<K, |p|>KS/uu(q|k|p). (D.7) The sum/summationtext |k|<K/summationtext∆ |p|<K, |q|>K1 2S/uu(k|p|q) involves transfers from k→pand also from p→k, which are equal and opposite. Therefore /summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|<K,|q|>K1 2S/uu(k|p|q) = 0. (D.8) Similarly, /summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|>K,|q|<K1 2S/uu(k|q|p) = 0, (D.9) and, /summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|<K,|q|<K1 2S/uu(k|q|p) = 0, (D.10) In other words all terms except both legs of Fig. D.1, p→klegs of Fig. D.1, and q→klegs of Fig. D.1 survive. We use these results to rewrite Πu< u>(K) as Πu< u>(K) =/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|,|q|>KS/uu(k|p|q) +/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|<K, |q|>K1 2S/uu(k|q|p) +/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |q|<K, |p|>K1 2S/uu(k|p|q) (D.11) Using symmetry between pandqwe get, /summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|<K,|q|>K1 2S/uu(k|q|p) =/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |q|<K,|p|>K1 2S/uu(k|p|q) (D.12) Hence, we can write, Πu< u>=/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|,|q|>KS/uu(k|p|q) +/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |q|<K, |p|<KS/uu(k|p|q) =/summationdisplay |k|<K∆/summationdisplay |p|>KS/uu(k|p|q) (D.13) This is the same as Πu< u>of Eq. (28). Thus, we have shown that Kraichnan’s formula for flux is the same as our formula based on the mode-to-mode transfer. 47[1] J. A. Domaradzki and R. S. Rogallo. Phys. Fluids A , 2:413, 1990. [2] J. A. Domaradzki. Phys. Fluids , 31:2747, 1988. [3] Y. Zhou. Phys. Fluids A , 5:1092, 1993. [4] Y. Zhou. Phys. Fluids A , 5:2511, 1993. [5] R. H. Kraichnan. J. Atmos. Sci. , 33:1521, 1976. [6] J. A. Domaradzki, R. W. Metcalfe, R. S. Rogallo, and J. J. R iley.Phys. Rev. Lett. , 58:547, 1987. [7] G. K. Batchelor. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) , 2:413, 1950. [8] M. K. Verma, D. A. Roberts, M. L. Golstein, S. Ghosh, and W. T. Stribling. J. Geophys. Res. , 101:21619, 1996. [9] A. Pouquet, U. Frisch, and J. Leorat. J. Fluid Mech. , 77:321, 1976. [10] A. Pouquet. J. Fluid Mech. , 88:1, 1978. [11] A. Ishizawa and Y. Hattori. chao-dyn/9810036 , 1998. [12] A. Ishizawa and Y. Hattori. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , 67:441, 1998. [13] M. Lesieur. Turbulence in Fluids - Stochastic and Numerical Modelling . Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990. [14] D. C. Leslie. Developments in the theory of turbulence . Oxford University Press, 1973. [15] R. H. Kraichnan. J. Fluid Mech. , 5:497, 1959. [16] M. M. Stanisic. The Mathematical Theory of Turbulence . Springer-Verlag, 1985. [17] G. Dar, M. K. Verma, and V. Eswaran, (submitted to Phys. P lasma) 48FIGURE CAPTIONS Fig. 1 two types of triads involved in transfer between shell mand shell n. Mode qcould be either inside a shell or could be located outside the shells. Fig. 2 The mode-to-mode energy transfers R/uu’s sought to be determined. Fig. 3 Mode-to-mode transfer can be expressed as a sum of circ ulating transfer and effective mode-to-mode transfer. Fig. 4 The circulating transfer and mode-to-mode transfer f rom shell nto shell mwith the arrows pointing towards the direction of energy transfer. Fig. 5 The circulating transfer X∆does not contribute to the energy flux out of the sphere K. Fig. 6 The combined energy transfers in a triad. Suu(k|p,q):u(p) and u(q)→u(k);Sbu(q|k,p):u(k) and u(p)→b(q);Sbb(k|p,q):b(p) andb(q)→b(k). Fig. 7 The mode-to-mode energy transfers sought to be determ ined. Fig. 8 Energy transfer between a pair of magnetic modes in a tr iad can be expressed as a sum of circulating transfer and effective mode-to-mode transfer. Fig. 9 Energy transfer between a velocity and a magnetic mode in a triad can be expressed as a sum of circulating transfer and effective mode-to-mode transfer. Fig. 10 The various energy fluxes defined in this section are sh own. The arrows indicate the directions of energy transfers corresponding to a positive flux. These fluxes are c omputed in numerical simulations and the results are 49given in a subsequent paper. Fig. B.1 In the wavenumber triad k,q→ ∞>>pthe circulating transfer, Y∆= 0 to avoid non-local transfer from very large wavenumbers to very small wavenumbers in compari son. Fig. D.1 he various triads involved in the terms in Eq. (D.4). Triad of type A does not contribute to energy flux. Triad of type C and D are equivalent and contribute the same am ount. 50ky kxkpq kq pShell Shell m nI II FIG. 1. 51FIG. 2. 52FIG. 3. 53FIG. 4. 54FIG. 5. 55b(k) b(p)u(q) u(k) u(p)Suu(k|p,q) Sbb(k|p,q)Sbu(q|k,p)b(q) FIG. 6. 56FIG. 7. 57FIG. 8. 58FIG. 9. 59B-sphereU-sphere ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ u< b<u< b>b< u> b< b>u> b>u< u> FIG. 10. 60pk ψφ θφ 0 q Fig. B. 1 61p kk k kp q p q p qK AB CD Fig. D. 1 62

arXiv:physics/0006013v1 [physics.atom-ph] 7 Jun 2000Multielectron ionization of atoms in strong fields: Classical analysis in symmetric subspace Krzysztof Sacha1,2and Bruno Eckhardt1 1Fachbereich Physik, Philipps Universit¨ at Marburg, D-350 32 Marburg, Germany 2Instytut Fizyki im. Mariana Smoluchowskiego, Uniwersytet Jagiello´ nski, ul. Reymonta 4, PL-30-059 Krak´ ow, Poland (February 2, 2008) We consider the final stage of multiple ionization of atoms in a strong linearly polarized laser field within a classical model. We propose that non-sequenti al multiple ionization is dominated by symmetric escape from a highly excited intermediate comple x. For a configuration of Nelectrons withCNvsymmetry in a plane perpendicular to the electric field we ana lyze the classical motion in phase space and discuss the final momentum distribution pa rallel and perpendicular to the po- larization axis. The results are in good agreement with rece nt experiment of multiple ionization in Ne. Double (or multiple) ionization of atoms is a funda- mental process to our understanding of many electron dynamics in external fields. The surprisingly large yields of multiply charged ions reported in the first experiments with intense laser fields [1] clearly show that sequen- tial ionization is not the leading process and that the electron-electron correlated dynamics has to be taken into account. One possibility is that the electron is shaken-off due to a non-adiabatic change in potential during the ionization of the first electron [2], a process that accounts for double ionization at high photon en- ergies (above 1 keV) [3]. For multiphoton ionization a two step process is more likely: one electron is ionized first, accelerated by the field and driven back to the atom where it ionizes the second electron in a rescattering col- lision [4–10]. The applicability of tunneling expressions as in [4,11] then is due to the first ionization taking place through a tunneling process in a quasi-static electric field . Such a sequence of events is supported also by the nu- merical calculations of Becker and Faisal [10]. The correlation between the electrons was convincingly demonstrated in a series of recent experiments. Measure- ments of the distributions of ion and electron momenta in double and triple ionization [12–15] clearly show a pref- erence for electrons escaping towards the same side of the atomic core along the field polarization axis [14]. On first sight this seems to be very different from the symmetric escape of electrons in double ionization in the absence of a field, where according to Wanniers analysis the electrons escape in opposite directions [16,17]. A closer analysis of Wanniers arguments shows, however, that they can be applied to this situation as well [18]. It is our aim here to generalize this model to the correlated escape of three or more electrons. The essential elements of Wanniers analysis are a di- vision of the process into two steps, the formation of a highly excited complex of two electrons close to the core and the two electron escape from this complex. At the threshold for ionization, energy is scarce. Therefore, in the dominant channel, mutual repulsion should be mini-mal and the energy should be equally shared by the out- going electrons. Any deviation from the symmetric ar- rangement in phase space or in energy would be amplified and lead to single rather than multiple ionization. These requirements become less stringent the higher the energy above threshold. One can argue that a similar division of the ioniza- tion process is possible in electric fields [18]. In partic- ular, ionization also proceeds through the formation of an intermediate highly excited complex, created during the rescattering event. But the next step is different, the configuration that dominates the ionization channel is no longer the Wannier state and the threshold energy is modified as well. For instance, double ionization is observed even though the estimated energy transferred by returning electron is too small for immediate double ionization [12]. As discussed in [18] this is possible if during the collision the external field is not zero, for then a Stark saddle opens through which the electrons can escape. This saddle breaks the symmetry and focuses the electrons in the direction of the electric field. It also forces the electrons to be close to a symmetry subspace, since by mutual repulsion the electron that reaches the saddle first can push the other back to the nucleus. This would then result in either single ionization or in another rescattering event, but not in double ionization. Classi- cal trajectory calculations within this symmetry subspace are able to reproduce the main features of the experimen- tally observed ion momentum distributions. In the present letter we present a generalization of our model [18] to multielectron ionization. The key assump- tion is that the process is dominated by a symmetric configuration of the electrons with respect to the field po- larization axis as suggested by the experiments [12–15]. Specifically, we assume that all electrons move in a plane perpendicular to the field and that they obey a CNvsym- metry, which generalizes the C2vsymmetry of the previ- ously analyzed case. The reflection symmetry limits the momenta to be parallel to the symmetry planes and thus confines the motion to a dynamically allowed subspace in 1the high-dimensional N-body phase space. I.e. if in the full phase space of the N-body problem initial conditions are prepared in this subspace they will never leave it. We take the electric field directed along the z-axis, and the positions of the N-electrons as zi=z,ρi=ρ andϕi= 2πi/N, where ( ρi, ϕi, zi) are cylindrical coor- dinates. The momenta of the electrons are all identical, pρ,i=pρ,pz,i=pzandpϕ,i= 0. For this geometry the classical Hamiltonian for Nelectrons, for zero total angular momentum along the field axis, in atomic units, with infinitely heavy nucleus and in dipole approxima- tion, reads H(pρ, pz, ρ, z, t ) =Np2 ρ+p2 z 2+V(ρ, z, t), (1) with potential energy V=−N2 /radicalbig ρ2+z2+N(N−1) 4ρsin(π/N)+NzFf (t)cos(ωt+φ) (2) and the pulse shape f(t) = sin2(πt/T d). (3) F,ωandφstand for peak amplitude, frequency and phase of the external field respectively, while Tdis the pulse duration. Experiments show that the multiple ionization is possi- ble even when the energy transferred by the rescattered electron is less than that needed to lift the system to the many electron continuum. We therefore assume that the complex from which multiple ionization starts is de- scribed by Hamiltonian (1) with initially negative energy E. Moreover, since the electronic motion close to the nu- cleus is much faster than the changes in the electric field the process of electron escape can be discussed adiabat- ically for fixed external field. This allows us to analyze the potential energy for a fixed time. Before we proceed with the analysis we take advantage of the scaling symmetry of the classical Hamiltonian (1) and eliminate one parameter. If the variables are rescaled according to H→√ FH, ρ, z→ρ/√ F, z/√ F, pρ, pz→F1/4pρ, F1/4pz, ω, t→F3/4ω, F−3/4t (4) the dynamics becomes independent of the peak value of the field amplitude, i.e. we obtain the system described by the Hamiltonian (1) with F= 1. Equipotential curves of Eq. (2) in the scaled variables (4), for N= 3 and N= 6 are shown in Fig. 1. The saddles are located along the lines z=rscosθsand ρ=rssinθswithθs=θorθs=π−θwhereθ= arctan/bracketleftBigg/parenleftbigg4Nsin(π/N) N−1/parenrightbigg2/3 −1/bracketrightBigg−1/2 (5) and r2 s=N ft/radicalBigg 1−/parenleftbiggN−1 4Nsin(π/N)/parenrightbigg2/3 (6) withft=|f(t)cos(ωt+φ)|. The energy of the saddle is Vs=−/radicalbig 4N3ft/bracketleftBigg 1−/parenleftbiggN−1 4Nsin(π/N)/parenrightbigg2/3/bracketrightBigg3/4 .(7) During a field cycle the saddle moves in from infinity along the line θs=θ, back out to infinity and then in and out again along the line θs=π−θ. The angle θ increases with the number of electrons N, while the en- ergy of the saddle changes non-monotonically as shown in Fig. 2. For N≥14 the saddle disappears. For this many electrons the repulsion between the electrons is stronger than the attraction to the nucleus, see Eq. (2) for z= 0. The situation with N≥14 is rather an extreme case from the experimental point of view but it reflects the fact that a bound state for a neutral atom with Nelec- trons symmetrically distributed in a plane can not be formed if N≥14. The saddle which is opened by the external field al- lows electrons to escape even if the total energy Eof the highly excited complex is negative. It is enough, classi- cally, that Eis greater than the energy of the saddle. The saddle thus provides a kind of transition state [19,20] for the ionization process: once the electrons cross it, they are accelerated by the field and pulled further away, mak- ing a return rather unlikely. Moreover, they can acquire the missing energy so that the electrons can escape even when the field vanishes. The field thus plays a double role in determining a threshold for this process: during the first stages of the rescattering process it provides the en- ergy for the collision complex and during the final stages it opens the path for multiple escape. In the experiment [15] of triple (also single and dou- ble) ionization of Ne by ultrashort (30 fs) laser pulses at 795 nm and at intensities 1.5 PW/cm2the distributions of momenta of ions parallel and perpendicular to the po- larization axis have been measured. In the limit of negli- gibly small momentum transfer by the absorbed photons, the ion momentum /vector pionreflects the sum of the momenta of the emitted electrons, /vector pion=−/summationtext i/vector pi[12,15]. To cal- culate the experimental distributions corresponding to the triple ionization of Ne we have performed classical trajectory simulations for N= 3. Note that the correct equations of motion for a single electron follow from the Hamiltonian (1) after division by N. The Hamiltonian (1) with N= 3 is the full Hamilto- nian for a Li with its three electrons. In order to relate it to triple ionization from atoms with more electrons the zero point in energy has to be shifted to the threshold for 2the three electron continuum, and all energies have to be taken relative to this level. Moreover, interactions with the electrons in the core are neglected. Specifically, for the modeling of the experiments [15] on triple ionization in Ne we thus assume that in a rescattering process the energy transfer is less than the threshold for triple ion- ization (about 4 .6 a.u.). The precise value of the initial energy Edepends on the details of the rescattering pro- cess and can thus not be determined within our model: it is a free parameter. The rescattering event is most likely to take place when the field amplitude is high, so we have started the simulation close to the top of the pulse, i.e. fort0= 0.33Td, where Td= 2412 a.u. corresponds to the experimental pulse duration [15]. The corresponding amplitude and frequency of the field are F= 0.207 a.u. andω= 0.057 a.u. For such field parameters the sad- dle energy equals −3.5 a.u. We have performed numer- ical simulations for several initial energies. The distri- butions of the electron momenta for E=−1 a.u. are shown in Fig. 3. The distribution for parallel momenta can be compared with the corresponding experimental distribution of ions momenta [15]. The main features of the distribution, its width and characteristic double hump structure, are well reproduced in our calculation. The minimum in the distribution is, however, less pro- nounced than that observed in the experiment. Overall, we take this good agreement as strong indication that triple ionization can only occur in the neighborhood of the symmetric process discussed here. For initial energies below about −3 a.u. the double hump structure disappears and only a single maximum remains. This corresponds to experiments with weaker fields which transfers less energy to the rescattered elec- tron. Then the electrons crossing the saddle have smaller kinetic energy and the interaction with the remainder of the pulse blurs the distribution. Such a change in the character of the distribution with decrease of field inten- sity has also been observed in the experiment of double ionization of He atoms [12]. The distribution for perpendicular ion momenta can not be calculated in our model since this component van- ishes exactly by symmetry. But we can calculate the transverse momentum of an individual escaping electron, as shown in Fig. 3. The absence of events around zero re- flects simply the effect of the repulsion between electrons. Measurements of this quantity should provide further test of this model. In conclusion we have shown that the double humped structure in ion momenta distribution observed in the experiment of triple ionization of Ne [15] can be calcu- lated within a classical simulation assuming symmetri- cally escaping electrons. This multi-ionization path can be extended to include up to 13 electrons. The successful comparison with the experimental data supports the idea that the dominant contribution to ionization comes from initial conditions in the highly excited collision complex that are asymptotic to this symmetry plane, very much as in Wanniers analysis [16,17,21].We would like to thank Harald Giessen for stimulat- ing our interest in this problem and for discussions of the experiments. Financial support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and by KBN under project 2P302B00915 are gratefully acknowledged. [1] A. L’Huiller, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2503 (1983). [2] D.N. Fittinghof, P.R. Bolton, B. Chang, and K.C. Ku- lander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2642 (1992). [3] V. Schmidt, Electron Spectrometry of Atoms using Syn- chrotron Radiation (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, England, 1997). [4] P.B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993) [5] K.C. Kulander, J. Cooper, and K.J. Schafer, Phys. Rev. A51, 561 (1995) [6] A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 29, L197 (1996) [7] A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 32, L335 (1999) [8] B. Sheehy, R. Lafon, M. Widmer, B. Walker, L.F. Di- Mauro, P.A. Agostini, and K.C. Kulander, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3942 (1998) [9] A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. A 59, R1742 (1999) [10] A. Becker and F.H.M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3546 (2000). [11] U. Eichmann, M. D¨ orr, H. Maeda, W. Becker, and W. Sandner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3550 (2000). [12] Th. Weber, M. Weckenbrock, A. Staudte, L. Spielberger, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, F. Afaneh, G. Urbasch, M. Vollmer, H. Giessen and R. D¨ orner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 443 (2000) [13] Th. Weber, M. Weckenbrock, A. Staudte, L. Spielberger, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, F. Afaneh, G. Urbasch, M. Vollmer, H. Giessen and R. D¨ orner, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 33, L1 (2000) [14] Th. Weber, H. Giessen, M. Weckenbrock, G. Urbasch, A. Staudte, L. Spielberger, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, M. Vollmer, and R. D¨ orner, Nature ???, ??? (2000) (in press) [15] R. Moshammer, B. Feuerstein, W. Schmitt, A. Dorn, C.D. Sch¨ oter, J. Ullrich, H. Rottke, C. Trump, M. Wittmann, G. Korn, K. Hoffmann and W. Sandner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 447 (2000) [16] G.H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 90, 817 (1953) [17] A. R. P. Rau , Phys. Rep. 110, 369, (1984) [18] B. Eckhardt and K. Sacha, physics/0005079. [19] E. P. Wigner, Z. Phys. Chemie B 19, 203 (1932); Trans. Faraday Soc. 3429, (1938) [20] E. Pollak, in Theory of Chemical Reactions , vol III, M. Baer, ed., (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1985, p. 123 [21] J.M. Rost, Phys. Rep. 297, 271 (1999) 3(a) ρ z024 -2 0 2 4 (b) ρ z024 -2 0 2 4 FIG. 1. Equipotential curves of the potential energy (2), in the scaled variables (4), for two different values of the nu m- ber of electrons: N= 3 [panel (a)] and N= 6 [panel (b)]. The potentials are plotted for fixed time corresponding to th e maximal field amplitude. The saddles move along the dashed lines when the electric field points in the positive z-direction and along the second obtained by reflections on z= 0 during the other half of the field cycle. Note that the angle between thez-axis and the dashed line increases with the number of electrons.0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 N−20−15−10−50 Vs FIG. 2. The energy of the saddle point of the potential (2), in the scaled variables (4), versus number of electrons N. The values correspond to the maximal field amplitude. −10 −5 0 5 10 3pz (a.u.)0.000.020.040.060.080.10 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 pρ (a.u.)0.00.51.01.52.02.5(a) (b) FIG. 3. Final distribution of electrons momenta parallel [panel (a)] and perpendicular [panel (b)] to the field polar- ization axis for E=−1 a.u. Panel (a) corresponds to the experimental distribution of ions momenta measured in the triple ionization of Ne [15]. Note that, in panel (b), the dis - tribution rapidly falls to zero around pρ≈0 reflecting the effect of repulsion between the electrons. The distribution s are based on an ensemble of 2 ·105trajectories. 4

1May 2000 IFT UWr 934/2000 THE PROBLEM OF FRICTION IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL RELATIVE MOTION Dariusz Grech Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wroclaw, pl. Maksa Borna 9, 50-205 Wroc ław, Poland e-mail: dgrech@ift.uni.wroc.pl Zygmunt Mazur Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Wroclaw, pl. Maksa Borna 9, 50-205 Wroc ław, Poland e-mail: zmazur@ifd.uni.wroc.pl ABSTRACT: We analyse a mechanical system in two-dimensional relative motion with friction. Although the system is simple, the peculiar interplay between two kinetic friction forces and gravity leads to the wide range of admissible solutions exceeding most intuitive expectations. In particular, the strong qualitative dependence between behaviour of the system, boundary conditions and parameters involved in its description is emphasised. The problem is intended to be discussed in theoretical framework and might be of interest for physics and mechanics students as well as for physics teachers.1. INTRODUCTION Friction forces make a part of elementary course of dynamics. Usually one states that the direction of the kinetic friction force acting on a given object is opposite to the direction of its motion and the magnitude of friction force is given as F = f N, where N is a normal reaction force acting on the object and f is the coefficient of kinetic friction. Authors of physics textbooks very seldom emphasize that the direction of friction is always antiparallel to the relative velocity of two rubbing surfaces. Almost all examples of motion with friction we meet in college and even in university physics textbooks do not show the importance of the above-mentioned fact. This paper describes behaviour of a simple mechanical system which should draw students' attention to the issue of relative motion of surfaces with friction. Let us consider a mechanical system shown in details in Fig. 1. A block B of mass m is put on the plane σ moving with constant velocity u/G72 parallel to its surface (like a belt conveyor). The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the surface of plane is given as f1>0. An additional vertical rough wall W is put across and slightly above the moving plane to forbid the motion of the block in u/G72 direction. The surface of plane is inclined to the horizontal with an angle 0< α <π/2 in such a way that block B can slide down along the wall W (see Fig. 1). The coefficient of kinetic friction between the wall W and the block B is assumed f2>0. The whole system is in the uniform, vertical gravity field g/G72, which is the source of motion for B against the wall. Figure 1. A view of the system. Most students and even experienced physicists asked about how this system will behave answer instinctively without calculations that B will constantly accelerate if it is only able to start to move on its own, due to gravity, at some initial moment t = 0 . Such expectation seems to be very natural but is it really the case here? We will show this expectation is completely unjustified and that the real behaviour of our mechanical system may, in general, seriously contradict the common sense point of view. Moreover, the particular choice of values for f 1, f2, and α parameters may be the source of chaotic motion for B. The essential role in proper description of this problem is played by the kinetic friction force [1]. As we already mentioned its direction is always antiparallel to the relative velocity of two 3rubbing surfaces*.The interplay between two kinetic friction forces present in the system, and described below, leads to amazing motion of the block B we analyse theoretically in this paper. 2. THE DYNAMICAL SYSTEM AND ITS EQUATION OF MOTION Let us introduce the system of coordinates OXY in such a way that OY axis is perpendicular to the wall W and OX axis lies in the plane σ (see Fig.1). The relative velocity relv/G72 of B against the plane is shown in Fig.2a. xy y v -uvrelψTy TxψT (a) (b) Figure 2 (a) The relative velocity of the block B against the plane σ (b) The decomposition of kinetic friction force T/G72 between the block B and the plane σ in OXY system of coordinates. Thus we have: ],[ uv v rel−=/G72 ( 1 ) where v is the linear velocity of the block along W. Following this consideration we find components of kinetic friction force T/G72 between B and σ (see Fig. 2b): T/G72 = [Tx,Ty] ( 2 ) where: αψcos cos1mgf Tx= (3) αψcos sin1mgf Ty= (4) and ()2/12 2cos uvvdf +=ψ (5) * In some physics textbooks (see e.g.[2]) the direction of kinetic friction force is simply defined as antiparallel to the velocity of moving object. Such definition is obviously incorrect because it does not make Newton laws of dynamics invariant for various inertial systems of reference. Indeed, if we change the reference system, the velocity (its direction and magnitude) also changes. However, kinetic friction force and any other force involved must remain unchanged. Otherwise, the second Newton's law would be obviously broken. 4From Newton’s laws of dynamics the equations of motion for B clearly read: /Gee/Ged/Gec =−− = yx TNNf T mg ma2 sinα (6) wheredtdva= is the acceleration of B along OX axis and N – the magnitude of reaction force of the wall W against B. With the use of relations (3)-(5) we get from (6) the final expression for block acceleration in OX direction: ()/Gf7/Gf7 /Gf8/Gf6 /Ge7/Ge7 /Ge8/Ge6 ++− =2/12 22 1 )()(1 sin utvuxtvxgdtdvα , (7) where we introduced new parameters to be used from now on: 1 1sfxdf = ( 8 ) 21 2 fsfxdf = ( 9 ) αctgdf s= ( 1 0 ) It is worth to notice from (7) that if the initial velocity of B is v0 ≡v(t= 0) =0 then the block is able to start to move (i.e. a(t = 0) > 0) only when x2 < 1. Contrary, the block rests all the time against the wall only if x2 ≥1. Indeed, in this case we have from (6): mg sinα=F T ( 1 1 ) where FT is the static friction force between B and W limited by its maximal value: FT ≤ f2Ty (12) Combination of Eqs(11), (12) and (4) provides the required condition x2 ≥1. It is interesting to look at the description of motion of this system in matrix form what we do in Appendix. 3. DISCUSSION OF SOLUTIONS The subject of further analysis is the non-linear differential equation given in Eq. (7). The detailed analytical solution of this equation is troublesome and it is much more convenient to solve it numerically. However, basic properties of admissible solutions can be found very easy at elementary mathematics level. In this paper we will additionally use the simple Euler's method [3] which is stable for the considered case to illustrate qualitatively these solutions. We see from the form of Eq.(7) that 0>dtdvif the right-hand side (RHS) of Eq.(7) satisfies the condition: () uxtvx utv2 12/12 2)( )( +>+ ( 1 3 ) For positive v(t), u, x1, x2, it is equivalent to the square inequality with respect to v(t): () () 0 1 )( 2 1)(2 22 212 12>−+ −− x utvxux x tv (14) with the discriminant: () 1 42 22 12−+=∆ x xu ( 1 5 ) 5Let us first discuss the case x2 <1. It is already seen that the list of admissible solutions in this case may significantly exceed our naive expectations. Here we meet three possibilities for x1 to be analysed: x1 >1, x1 <1 and x1 =1. The RHS of Eq.(7) versus v(t) is plotted for these possibilities in Fig. 3a. We discuss them in following subsections. vdv/dt(i ) ( ii) ( iii) (i v) vfv− v+ vn0 vdv/dt(v) (vi ) v+0 Figure 3a. The acceleration of the block B versus velocity v for x2<1: (i) x1≥1, (ii) x1<1 and 12 22 1<+x x , (iii) x1<1 and 12 22 1>+xx , (iv) x1<1 and 12 22 1=+x x Figure 3b. The acceleration of the block B versus velocity v for : (v) x2≥ 1 and x1≥1, (vi) x2≥ 1 and x1<1 3.1. SOLUTIONS FOR X1 >1 The range of ( x1, x2) parameters involved in these solutions is shown in Fig. 4a. From Eq.(15) we have ∆ > 0 and therefore two distinct real roots of inequality (13) (and also those of RHS of Eq.(7)) exist: () 2 12/12 22 1 21 11 xx x xxu v−−+±=± (16) Clearly v+ <0, while v_ >0. The latter relation follows from the inequality: () 1 12 12 22 1 −>− xx x ( 1 7 ) obviously satisfied for x1 >1 and x2 <1, which can also be written as: ()212/12 22 1 1 xx xx >−+ ( 1 8 ) Hence we have: /Gef/Gef/Gef /Gee/Gef/Gef/Gef /Ged/Gec > <= =≤≤ > fff vv ifdtdvvv ifdtdvvv ifdtdv ,0,00 ,0 (19) where () 11 2 1212/12 22 1 −−−+==−xxx x xu vvdf f (20) 6It means that v(t) = vf is the stationary and stable solution of Eq.(7) [4]. The numerical simulation of integral curves with various boundary conditions for considered range of x1, x2 parameters is shown in Fig.4b. 01 01x2 x1 tv vf 0 0 (a) (b) Figure 4. (a) The range of parameters x1>1, x2<1 marked in ( x1, x2) plane and (b) corresponding integral curves of equation of motion drawn for various boundary conditions. The final velocity vf is always stable and finite. 3.2. SOLUTIONS FOR X 1<1. Here ∆ can be either positive or negative (see Eq. 15). Thus several options are to be discussed: ∆<0 , ∆>0 and ∆=0. This is what we do below: 3.2.1. THE OPTION ∆<0 The domain of ( x1, x2) parameters satisfying this condition is shown in Fig.5a. The RHS of Eq.(7) has no roots and therefore, according to (14), is positive for all v(t)≥0. It means that the block accelerates independently on its initial velocity. Our intuition indicates this possibility as the “most natural”. We present integral curves for this option in Fig.5b. tv 01 01x2 x10 0 (a) (b) Figure 5. (a) The range of parameters 12 22 1<+x x marked in ( x1, x2) plane and (b) corresponding integral curves of equation of motion drawn for various boundary conditions. Continuous acceleration is clearly seen. 3.2.2. T HE OPTION ∆>0 The area in ( x1, x2) plane corresponding to this criterion is shown in Fig.6a. The RHS of Eq.(7) is null for v± already given in Eq.(16). One easy checks that: 0>>−+v v ( 2 1 ) 7what follows from the reverse relation (17) satisfied in the considered domain ( x1<1, x2<1), namely: () 1 12 12 22 1 −<− xx x (22) Thus we have: /Gef/Gef/Gef /Gee/Gef/Gef/Gef /Ged/Gec << <= = => <≤ > + −− ++ − vv v ifdtdvvvorvv ifdtdvvvorvv ifdtdv ,0,00 ,0 (23) It means that v(t) = v_ is the stationary and stable solution of Eq(7) while v(t) = v+ is unstable, i.e. any infinitesimal increase of the initial or instant velocity above v+ (or infinitesimal change in friction coefficients f1, f2 - what may always occur locally) leads to contrary different behaviour of the system than if this velocity is slightly below v+. The situation is clarified with integral curves in Fig.6b. This diagram shows the possibility of chaotic motion of the block around v+ for x1<1, x2<1, 12 22 1>+xx . Chaotic behaviour is usually understood as strong qualitative dependence between the solution of differential equation and the boundary condition (or parameters of considered equation) [5]. Figure 6. (a) The range of parameters 12 22 1>+x x , x1<1, x2<1 marked in ( x1, x2) plane and (b) corresponding integral curves v(t) of equation of motion drawn for various boundary conditions. Two stationary solutions v+(t) = const and v-(t) = const are seen but only one of them ( v-(t) = const) is stable. 3.2.3. THE OPTION ∆=0 It corresponds to the constraint (see Fig.7a) 12 22 1=+x x ( 2 4 ) Two roots of RHS of Eq.(7) coincide now together: 2 121 1xxxuv vvdf n−===−+ (25) 8and make up the unstable stationary solution of differential equation as shown in Fig.7b. tv 01 01x2 x1vn 0 0 (a) (b) Figure 7. (a) The range of parameters satisfying the condition 12 22 1=+x x and (b) corresponding integral curves v(t) of equation of motion drawn for various boundary conditions. The unique stationary solution v n(t) = const is unstable. 3.3. SOLUTIONS FOR X1=1. The unique root of RHS of Eq.(7) for the above range of ( x1, x2) values is: 22 2 21 ffuvs−= ( 2 6 ) It is easy to verify that: /Gef/Gef/Gef /Gee/Gef/Gef/Gef /Ged/Gec > <= =< > sss vvifdtdvvvifdtdvvvifdtdv ,0,0,0 (27) Thus vs is the stable and stationary solution and the system evolves regularly (similarly to the case x1>1) with integral curves plotted already in Fig.4b. 3.4. SOLUTIONS FOR X2 ≥ 1 Here we deal with the range of parameters shown in Figs. 8a, 9a. If x2 ≥1 the block is unable to start from the rest itself. Nevertheless the instant external action can force it to do so (see the previous section). What happens then? If v0 >0 we are still eligible to use Eq.(7). The discriminant ∆ given in Eq.(15) is obviously nonnegative for x2 ≥1 and two roots of RHS of Eq.(7) are produced, given by Eq.(16). Using the same procedure as before it is easy to verify they are both negative for 11≥x . Thus the inequality (14) is never satisfied and thererefore 0<dtdv for all v>0 as shown in Fig. 3b. 9The block will stop as visualized in Fig. 8b. tv 01 01x2 x10 0 (a) (b) Figure 8. (a) The range of parameters x1 > 1, x2 ≥ 1 marked in ( x1, x2) plane and (b) corresponding integral curves v(t) of equation of motion drawn for various boundary conditions. It is seen the velocity decreases fast to zero. Contrary, for x 1 <1, relations v+ >0 and v_ <0 hold ( v_ < 0 because for x1 <1 and x2>1 the inequality (17) is satisfied). Hence the inequality (15) also holds for any v(t)>v+ so that 0<dtdv for 0≤v(t)<v+ and 0>dtdv for v(t)>v+ (see Fig. 3b). It means that our block will accelerate if its initial velocity v0>v+ and will decelerate until stopping if v0<v+. The integral curves for this case are plotted in Fig. 9b. The behaviour around v+ can be chaotic again because v(t)=v+ is the stationary but unstable solution of Eq.(7). 01 01x2 x1 tv 0v+ 0 (a) (b) Figure 9. (a) The range of parameters x1 < 1, x2 ≥ 1 marked in ( x1, x2) plane and (b) corresponding integral curves v(t) of equation of motion drawn for various boundary conditions. Diagram shows instability of the unique stationary solution: v+(t) = const 4. CONCLUSIONS In this article we have made a theoretical analysis of the evolution of a simple mechanical system, where the interplay between two dependent kinetic friction forces and gravity leads in same cases to interesting and unexpected results. Unexpected – in the sense that our intuition tells us the system should evolve differently than it really does. This phenomenon occurs for the particular choice of parameters x 1, x2 describing the system and reflects the non-linearity of 10its differential equation of motion. In fact the shape of solutions depends only on the slope α and two coefficients of friction f1, f2. The variety of obtained solutions makes considered toy-system an interesting theoretical exercise which explains how far a deep understanding of simple physical idea (e.g. kinetic friction force) is important in qualitative description of the system. The space of physically admissible parameters x 1≥0, x2≥0 may be divided into several subdomains as shown in Fig.10a. They can also be translated into ( f1, f2) plot where they look like in Fig. 10b. Each subdomain has been analysed separately in the former section. Corresponding sets of integral curves for velocity v(t) have been drawn in Figs. 4b-9b, while dtdv plot against v(t) is shown in Figs. 3a, 3b. The behaviour of the system is quite regular in subdomains (i), (ii), (v) (see Fig. 10). It means that v(t) has the similar property independently on initial conditions (initial velocity). Figure 10. (a) The space of physically admissible parameters ( x1, x2) divided into subdomains. The notation in subdomains corresponds to the sequence of discussion in the text. (b) The space of physically admissible friction coefficients corresponding to these subdomains drawn for particular choice of s parameter ( α = π/12). The hatched area corresponds to parameter range where unstable solutions of equation of motion exist. However this situation changes drastically in remaining subdomains represented as hatched area in Fig. 10. In that case the shape of solutions and their properties (see Figs. 6b, 7b, 9b) are very sensitive to initial conditions of motion (velocity above or below v +) where v+ is given in Eq.(16) or in explicite form as: ()()uff f ffff tvαα αα2 2 12/1 2 2 22 1 22 1 2 1ctg 1]1 ctg 1[ ctg,,;−− ++=+ (28) For v = v+ ± ε (ε → 0) there is a strong qualitative dependence of the solution from the local values of f1, f2 and α involved in v+ determination. Any infinitesimal change in these parameters makes the further motion of the block qualitatively different. Since then the evolution is difficult to be predicted. It is known that such phenomenon may be the source of chaotic behaviour of the dynamical system. Basically it reflects the non-linearity of differential equation involved in the description of the process. 11In the considered model this non-linearity comes from the interplay between two dependent kinetic friction forces acting in the same direction: Tx and f2Ty connected in time-dependent way according to Eqs. (3)-(5): utvtTT yx )()( ctg= =ψ ( 2 9 ) Let us finally notice that all discussed cases seem to be realistic. This is shown explicite in Fig. 10b where considered subdomains are plotted in ( f1, f2) plane as the example for α= π/12. It is clear that the values of f1 and f2 are accessed for the wide class of materials and therefore we hope that a real model like the one considered can be built to visualise properties discussed here theoretically. APPENDIX One dimensional motion of mass m in OX direction under the action of net external force Fext and a friction force T=fN, where f is the coefficient of kinetic friction and N- the normal reaction force from the surface (OX-line), is described by known formula fN Fdtxdmext−=22 (A1) The case discussed in this paper has however two surfaces involved. Therefore there are two different reaction forces causing friction. Two dimensional motion (in OXY reference frame) may be described by simple generalization of the formula (A1) in the following way: N R R FdtrdmW ext F−++=/G72 /G72 /G72/G72 σ 22 (A2) where r is a position vector of the block in OXY frame, Fext is the net external force (in our case played by gravity) and R σ(W) are the reaction forces from two surfaces (the plane σ and the wall bareer W respectively). /Gfa/Gfb/Gf9 /Gea/Geb/Ge9= WNNNσis a 2x1 matrix with entries formed by subsequent magnitudes of reaction forces from these surfaces: Nσ = mg cosα ( A 3 ) NW = Nσ f1sinψ Note that σσ⊥N and W NW⊥ so that N does not form a vector in OXY plane (as it was not in (A1) either). F is the generalization of friction coefficients, i.e. 2x2 friction matrix with entries depending on coefficients f1, f2 and velocity v. It is easy to verify from Figs 1, 2 that /Gfa/Gfb/Gf9 /Gea/Geb/Ge9 −=/Gfa/Gfb/Gf9 /Gea/Geb/Ge9=/Gfa/Gfb/Gf9 /Gea/Geb/Ge9= WW extNR RmgF0,00,0sin /G72 /G72 /G72 σα (A4) while entries of the friction matrix should be chosen as: to reproduce the eqation (6) as the first entry of (A2). The second entry of (A2) gives 022 =dtydm , and hence, from boundary conditions, y(t)=0. 12Nondiagonal form of F and its dependence on velocity (via dependence on ψ) is the source for variety of qualitatively different solutions discussed throughout this paper. Similarity between (A2) and (A1) is the quickest alternative way to explain why the system is so mysterious. Solutions of one dimensional case (A1) would also look differently if dependence of friction coefficient f on velocity v was assumed. REFERENCES : 1. Thewlis J 1962 Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Physics (Mac Millan, New York; Pergamon Press, Oxford) Vol. 3, p 307. 2. Serway R A 1996 Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics (Saunders College Publishing) p 125. 3. Atkinson K 1993 Elementary Numerical Analysis (John Wiley & Sons) 4. Arnold V I 1992 Ordinary Differential Equations (Springer) 5. Schuster H G 1988 Deterministic Chaos. An Introduction (VCH Verlagsgeselschaft mbH).

arXiv:physics/0006015v1 [physics.bio-ph] 7 Jun 2000The Architecture of Idiotypic Networks: Percolation and Sc aling Behaviour Markus Brede and Ulrich Behn Institut f¨ ur Theoretische Physik, Universit¨ at Leipzig, Augustusplatz 10, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany Abstract We investigate a model where idiotypes (characterizing B-l ymphocytes and antibodies of an immune system) and anti-idiotypes are repr esented by com- plementary bitstrings of a given length dallowing for a number of mismatches (matching rules). In this model, the vertices of the hypercu be in dimension d represent the potential repertoire of idiotypes. A random s et of (with proba- bility p) occupied vertices corresponds to the expressed repertoir e of idiotypes at a given moment. Vertices of this set linked by the above mat ching rules build random clusters. We give a structural and statistical characterisation of these clusters – or in other words – of the architecture of t he idiotypic network. Increasing the probability pone finds at a critical pa percolation transition where for the first time a large connected graph oc cures with prob- ability one. Increasing pfurther, there is a second transition above which the repertoire is complete in the sense that any newly introduce d idiotype finds a complementary anti-idiotype. We introduce structural ch aracteristics such as the mass distributions and the fragmentation rate for ran dom clusters, and determine the scaling behaviour of the cluster size dist ribution near the percolation transition, including finite size corrections . We find that slightly above the percolation transition the large connected clust er (the central part of the idiotypic network) consists typically of one highly c onnected part and a number of weakly connected constituents and coexists with a number of small, isolated clusters. This is in accordance with the picture of a central and a peripheral part of the idiotypic network and gives some supp ort to idealized architectures of the central part used in recent dynamical m ean field models. PACS numbers: 64.60.Ak, 05.10.Ln, 02.70.Lq, 87.18.-h Typeset using REVT EX 1I. INTRODUCTION B-lymphocytes carry on their surface highly specific recept ors, so-called antibodies. If these receptors detect complementary structures, the lymp hocyte is stimulated to proliferate and after several generations and differentation into plasm a cells secrete antibodies of the same specificity. B-lymphocytes and antibodies of a given sp ecificity are said to have a cer- tain idiotype. Complementary structures to an idiotype are antigen or other, anti-idiotypic antibodies. Between B-lymphocytes of different idiotype th us emerges a functional network of mutual stimulation and inhibition, the idiotypic networ k [1]. The idiotypic network is supposed to at least partially contribute to the functional ity of the immune system as, e.g., immunological memory or suppression of autoreactive clone s. Though quantitative data are very hard to access by experiment there are some recent obser vations which underline the importance of idiotypic interactions [2,3]. New idiotypes are produced in the bone marrow or due to hyperm utation during the proliferation of stimulated lymphocytes which introduces a random metadynamics of the repertoire. At a given moment the random network has a certai n architecture. The aim of this paper is to give a statistical description of this archi tecture. Knowledge of the typical architecture of the idiotypic network is crucial for descri bing the population dynamics of the interacting B-lymphocytes and antibodies, cf. [4,5], whic h is however not the subject of this paper. Derived from hypotheses of theoretical immunology (cf. [1, 6], for a recent review see [7]) we present a statistical analysis of bit-string based netwo rks, which shows, that this approach is well suited to reproduce reasonable network structures. Especially, our considerations show, that realistic network topologies can be conceived as an extension of first approaches to that problem which assumed a Bethe-lattice structure. Su ggestions of how loops should be added to such structures have been made previously [8]. Fo r this, our work provides a very natural access. Generally, idiotypic networks are supposed to realize a tra deoff between two basic re- quirements: they should contain a great number of small isol ated components, but on the other hand still be able to respond to arbitrary antigen, tha t means being complete. Small components are thought necessary to store information abou t previously encountered anti- gen [7,9,10]. The existence of such components does obvious ly demand a low connectivity of the network. With completeness on the other hand it is assu med that of a great number of antibodies each is able to detect many different types of an tigen. Hence the network connectivity should not be too low. With regard to the underlying biological problem the one gre at–many small clusters situation is thus worthwhile to earn special attention. The oretical immunologists suppose that the idiotypic network should consist of a large number o f small clusters. On the other hand, as a consequence of relatively high connectivities, a lso a large component should be contained within the idiotypic network, which is denoted as its central part. This great cluster could play an important role in the control of autore active clones [6,11–13]. In the following the bit-string model of [14] will be explain ed briefly. Basically, antibodies are identified with bit chains of a given length d. Thus, there are 2ddifferent antibody types. 2The set of all conceivable antibodies, i.e. the potential re pertoire, is then represented by {i= (i1, ..., i d), i∈ {0,1}}. Estimating the probable size of networks that can be comple te in the above sense shows that d≈32...36 should be a good value for realistic models [15]. Antibodies recognize each other if they have complementary structures, i.e. if they are represented by perfectly complementary bit strings. If the re are small deviations from the exact structural complementarity a matching is still possi ble, though with lower affinity. This is described by so-called matching rules. For example we imagine that antibodies react if the respecti ve structures are complemen- tary except one small region. Using the language of our model the corresponding bit-strings should be inverse except one bit that belongs to the non-comp lementary region. We call this kind of rule a one-mismatch rule. Two-mismatch rules, which allow reactions between anti- bodies that are complementary up to two non-matching region s, are accordingly defined by connecting bit-strings that are complementary with two exc eptions allowed. Naturally, the multitude of possible rules is not exhausted by mismatch rul es. Rules that express matching of mutually shifted antibody parts could be conceived as wel l. For the sake of simplicity this work is confined to those matching rules that are associa ted with reactions of highest affinity, i.e. inversion, one- and two-mismatch rules. Mathematically, the set of all antibody types (represented by bit-strings or vertices of a hypercube) together with all possible reactions between t hem defines a graph. Thus, we want to call G1 d=({v= (v1, ..., v d), vj∈ {0,1}},{vconnected with w ifvi=wjfor all i, j= 1, ..., d except one position at the most }) (1) the one-mismatch base graph and G2 d=({v= (v1, ..., v d), vj∈ {0,1}},{vconnected with w ifvi=wjfor all i, j= 1, ..., d except two positions at the most }) (2) the two-mismatch base graph, respectively. To obtain a bett er impression of one-mismatch graphs they can be compared to hypercubes of the same dimensi on. Looking, e.g., on hypercubes of dimension d= 3 edges of one-mismatch graphs are represented by all space and side diagonals. This, together with a picture of an one-m ismatch graph in dimension five is shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. The actual repertoire, i.e. the set of all types of idiotypes that are really existing within the body at a given time, is a subset of the potential repertoi re. There are profound reasons to believe that the actual repertoire should be distributed randomly within the potential repertoire [7]. A way of realizing this is to choose antibodi es with a certain probability p. Then the idiotypic network is represented by the random gra ph that is composed of all occupied vertices (antibodies) and their connections (pos sible reactions). Clearly, this is a percolation problem [16]. Percolation problems on standard lattices are far away from beeing a new field of research. Percolation on one-mismatch graphs, however, bears some ma jor difference to ordinary percolation. 3Percolation is always connected to an abrupt change of some s ystem property (the stan- dard property is the existence of a connecting path from the u pper to the lower boundary on 2-dimensional lattices) if the occupation probability pas ses a certain value, the percolation threshold. This transition becomes sharp in the limit of infi nite systems. On lattices there is no question how to increase the system si ze to infinity. However, sequences of one-mismatch graphs exhibit relations betwee n small and large systems that are essentially different from similar characteristics of l attices which are created by the multiplication of a unit cell. Understanding of these disti nctions comes from studying the structure of fully occupied one-mismatch graphs (base grap hs) which will be performed in the ensuing Section. Generally, the conception of the paper is as follows: in Sec. II topological properties of base-graphs will be studied. Section III gives an analysi s of the underlying percolation problem, which then leads, together with applications of ra ndom graph theory from Sec. IV and a study of intrinsic structures of great clusters in Sec. V, to conclusions about parameter regimes, in which bit-string model induced random graphs re semble idiotypic networks. In the appendix another method to calculate thresholds via the renormalization of small cells will be discussed. II. STRUCTURE OF THE BASE GRAPH FOR THE ONE-MISMATCH RULE The above definition of matching rules allows an easy calcula tion of distances between vertices of G1 d. Let i, j∈G1 dbe vertices, dHtheir Hamming distance (i.e. the number of different bits between them) and dG(i, j) = inf pathes winG1 d connecting iandjl(w) , (3) where l(w) denotes the length of a path w, a metrics. Then it holds that if dH< d/2 dG=/braceleftBigg dH fordHeven dH+ 1 for dHodd dH=d/2 dG=d/2 for deven (4) dH> d/2 dG=/braceleftBigg d−dH+ 1 for dHeven d−dH fordHodd , which shows that the maximum distance Dmax(d) between vertices is roughly the half of that on ordinary hypercubes. This is essentially due to the i nversion rule. Furthermore, it should be noticed that Dmax(d) does not change when increasing the dimension by one from odd (d= 2n+ 1) to even ( d= 2n+ 2) values. To obtain additional information about the toplogy we disti nguish vertices corresponding to their distance sto an arbitrarily chosen origin, e.g. v= 0 = (0 , ...,0), whose choice is arbitrary due to the specific construction-rule of base grap hs. We denote the set of vertices with distance dG(v, i) from vby Es={i∈G1 d|dG(v, i) =s}. (5) 4Applying (4) it is possible to compute the number of vertices |Es|belonging to Es(mass distribution) by simple combinatorics to |Es|=  /parenleftBigg d dG−1/parenrightBigg ifdG=d+1 2 /parenleftBigg d+ 1 dG/parenrightBigg ifdG≤d 2. (6) A visualization of (6) in Fig. (3) shows a major difference bet ween odd and even dimen- sionsd. Generally, |Es|grows monotonically with increasing distance. For odd dime nsions, however, the number of vertices with maximal distance Dmaxfromvis substantially smaller than that with distance Dmax−1 Differences in the overall structure of graphs in odd and even dimensions dbecome even more obvious if the number of links connecting vertices of th e same set Esis considered. Using (4), a somewhat lengthy but straightforward calculat ion shows that connected vertices in the same distance sfrom the origin voccur in deven only for s=Dmax=d/2 dodd only for s=Dmax= (d+ 1)/2 or (7) s=Dmax−1. Analogously, the number of links that connect vertices of Eswith vertices belonging to Es+1 may be computed to d+ 1−sfors < D max−1. As a consequence there must exist loops of even as well as of od d length. Moreover, all short loops with length less than dmust be even (since only loops comprising links between vertices in the same distance from any loop element can be of a n odd length). An important property of standard systems in percolation th eory is that the smaller system is always contained within the larger one. For one-mi smatch graphs, however, this is not possible. Let d1< d2be dimensions of G1 d1andG1 d2, respectively. If G1 d1were contained inG1 d2it would follow directly that G1 d2should have uneven loops with length less then d1. This gives a contradiction since G1 d2contains no odd loops smaller than d2, whereas d1< d2 by assumption. Resuming these results we state that percolation on one mism atch graphs differs from standard percolation. A crucial point for this distinction is the way how global system properties change if the system size approaches infinity. Th erefore it could seem at least questionable whether standard methods of percolation theo ry can be applied to this kind of problem. Though, making use of the fact that ordinary hype rcubes are contained in one-mismatch graphs and applying an appropriately choosen majority rule, renormalization group procedures can be extended to one-mismatch-graphs (s ee appendix A). To the best of our present knowledge percolation problems on graphs with similar prop- erties have not been dealt with. Even percolation on regular hypercubes has found relatively little attention in the physical literature [17]. 5III. CLUSTER SIZE DISTRIBUTION Having collected some simple properties of the underlying b ase graphs we consider now vertices of that graphs occupied with a given probability p. The set of all occupied vertices Γ together with all bonds, which connect two vertices belong ing to Γ forms a random graph. In terms of percolation theory a maximal set of connected ver tices is called cluster. What is the probability that an arbitrarily chosen vertex be longs to a cluster of size |C|? This question has already been addressed in [9,10] where thr ee major regimes of the system have been identified (see also the numerical results in Fig. 4 ): (i) The first typical situation arises for small values of the occupation probability p. Then only small clusters (whose individual size doesn’t mak e up a finite fraction of the whole system) are expected to appear. (ii) Increasing pand approaching infinite dimensions, a sharp transition (in the sequel denoted as percolation transition) to an one great cluster– many small clusters regime was found. At the percolation transition some characteristics obey scaling laws. These and an approximation to compute percolation thresholds will be de alt with in Sec. IV. The one great–many small clusters situation is worthwhile t o earn special attention (cf. Sec. I). The great cluster could play an important role in the control of autoreactive clones. To fulfill that purpose it is believed to have a certain intern al structure (cf. [12,13,18], for experimental data cf. [19]), which will be discussed in more detail in Sec. VI. Thus, as stated already in [9,10] the simple one–parametric bit chain model exhibits an interesting similarity to the idiotypic network. (iii) Finally, if the occupation probability is further inc reased, a state where random graphs consist of one connected component only will be reach ed. Relying on some general results of the theory of random graphs it can be shown that thi s indeed marks a second (in the limit of infinite systems) sharp transition which we call denseness transition. In Sec. V these considerations are resumed and discussed with refere nce to the completeness of the immune system. IV. SCALING LAWS AND BETHE APPROXIMATION A common method to analyze percolation problems is the intro duction of perimeter polynomials D|C|. Using the standard notation we define p(|C|) =p|C|/summationdisplay Sfree(C)(1−p)|Sfree(C)|=p|C|D|C|(1−p), (8) where p(|C|) denotes the probability that a vertex on the base graph belo ngs to a cluster of size|C|.Sfree(C) means the free surface, i.e. the set of all unoccupied verti ces of the base graph that are adjacent to vertices of C. Generally, there are few problems which allow the explicit c alculation of D|C|for arbitrary cluster size |C|. Notwithstanding, it is always possible to compute D|C|for small values of |C|. This provides a basis for the application of series expansi on techniques. Investigating the structure of small clusters up to size |C|= 5 on one-mismatch-graphs, we obtain the 6following perimeter polynomials D1(q) =qd+1, (9) D2(q) = (d+ 1)q2d, (10) D3(q) =3 2(d+ 1)dq3d−2, (11) D4(q) =q4d−4(2(d−1)d(d+ 1) +d(d+ 1) 2+ +2 3q(d−1)d(d+ 1)) , (12) D5(q) =5 2q5d−6(d−1)d(d+ 1)(d−2 +1 q(d−1) + 1 q2+1 q3(d−2)) , (13) where q= 1−p. High dimension expansions provide a way to calculate the per colation threshold making use of the fact that loops in random graphs on sparsely occupi ed high dimensional lattices are very improbable. Indeed, the first terms in the resulting app roximation for the percolation transition on a hypercubic lattice of dimension dcan be shown to equal the exact value for the percolation transition for Bethe-lattices with coordi nation number d[20,21]. Further terms in that series give corrections of order O(d−2) to Bethe-lattices. A closer look at the perimeter polynomials (9-13) supports t he hypothesis that this also holds for one-mismatch graphs. Considering for instance cl usters of size |C|= 4 we perceive that the fraction of D4belonging to 4-loops is expressed by (1 −p)4d−4d(d+ 1)/2 which decreases substantially faster than D4, if dimension goes to infinity. The low importance of loops on one-mismatch-graphs in high dimensions is also sup ported by the fact, that ordinary hypercubes up to dimension d−1, for which the assertion of the low importance of loops hold s [22], are contained within G1 d. Thus, for small prandom graphs on one-mismatch-graphs are very similar to random graphs on Bethe-lattices with the same coordination number. Consequently the percolation threshold for one-mismatch- graphs can be approximated to p(1) c= 1/d, (14) whereas for two-mismatch graphs holds p(2) c= 1/(d+d(d+ 1)/2). (15) Corrections to (14) and (15) are of order O(d−2) and O(d−3), respectively. From consider- ations of Sec. I we find that the number of links connecting ver tices in Eswith vertices in Es+1decreases with growing distance s. Thus, we conclude that the corrections to p(1) cmust be positive. Typically for percolation problems, certain system charac teristics obey scaling laws at the percolation threshold. This kind of laws reflects the sta tistical self similarity of clusters on different length scales in that parameter regime. Fig. VII displays simulation results for the cluster size distributions obtained for one-mismatch- graphs of dimensions 10 and 14 . Both data sets can be well described by the finite size scaling ansatz p(|C|) =|C|−τF(|C|/|C|∗) , (16) 7where the function F(x) is nearly a constant for x≪1 and will be more rapidly declining than any power law for arguments x≫1. Equation (16) should apply for clusters which are neither too small nor too large. Due to the limited size of the investigated systems, very large clusters behave in a different way than clusters of ‘standard’ size. The transition between the laws applying to these seperate cases is marked b y|C|∗, which in turn depends on the extent of the system. Analogous properties can be observed for base graphs defined by other matching rules. Figure 6 illustrates scaling behaviour for the case of graph s diced on two-mismatch-base graphs for values of p=p(2) ccf. (15). As a natural consequence of adding supplementary edges distances between vertices will become smaller in com parison to one-mismatch-graphs. This gives an explanation for the fact, that typical sizes |C|∗are substantially smaller than those examined on one-mismatch-graphs with the same choice ofd. Furthermore, it can be seen in Fig. VII that the scaling law (1 6) even well applies to very small Clusters. It is useful to define a cluster size depe ndent exponent τ|C|by τ|C|=−lnp(|C|+1) p(|C|) ln|C|+1 |C|. (17) Evaluating the perimeter polynomials (9)-(13), values of τ|C|for small |C|can be derived. Thus we obtain a sequence {τ|C|}which should approach the true value of τfor large |C|. As a matter of fact (16) changes to p(|C|)∼ |C|−τin the limit of infinite systems. Performing the limits d→ ∞ in Eqs. (9)-(13) and (17), we observe that τ∞ |C|obeys τ∞ |C|=1 ln(1 +1 |C|)− |C|+ 1 , (18) which by comparison of (17) with (18) and solving the recursi on relation implies the law p(|C|) =e−|C||C||C|−2 |C|!(19) for the cluster size distribution. Equation (18) leads to τ= 3/2 for large clusters. The thus computed value τ= 3/2 is in accord with the exact result on the Bethe-lattice. Since we investigate a model for a biological system our main interest is devoted to large, yet finite systems. In the sequence {τ|C|}our best approximation for the real value of τisτ4. A comparison between values of τcomputed by τ≈τ4and exponents τobtained by evaluating numerical data for small systems suggests tha t the involved approximation becomes rapidly more accurate if the system size is increase d. Hence in d= 32 we rely on τ4and find τ≈1.5, which gives a result that also supports the previous assum ption. Subsequently it was our aim to find a quantity which gives an ov erall estimation of deviations between random graphs on one-mismatch-graphs f rom those on Bethe-lattices of equal coordination number. For this purpose it appears ap propriate to investigate the results of an edge elimination procedure which computes the number of bonds belonging to loops. Similar procedures have very recently [23] been appl ied to lattices. The above aim is achieved by individually removing every edg e of every cluster and calculating the number of the connected components of the re sulting graph. An edge is called fractioning if two components are obtained cutting t his edge. Clearly, only edges that belong to loops are not fractioning. 8Then the ratio of fractioning edges in relation f(C) to the overall number of bonds b(C) of a cluster C, defined by f=f(C)/b(C), is some indication for the importance of loops for the structure of C. Distinguishing clusters according to their size |C|we computed the mean fractioning ratio f|C|=< f(C′)/b(C′)>|C′|=|C|. Excluding very small clusters with trivial structure, Fig. 7 illustrates the validity of a finit e size scaling law f|C|=|C|−λˆF(|C|/|C|′) (20) for the fragmentation rate fat the percolation threshold. Again, a cluster size dependent exponent λ(|C|) may be defined. Employing the perime- ter polynomials D4andD5it is possible to obtain a rough estimation for λ, which is, analogously to (17), expected to become sufficiently accurat e for large systems. From λ4(d)≈1 ln 5/4/parenleftbigg393 2·103d−1+4029120 8·106d−2/parenrightbigg (21) we derive λ≈0.03 in 32 dimensions to be compared with λ= 0 which holds for Bethe- lattices. Thus the value λ >0 measured on random graphs on one-mismatch-graphs – which is caused by a small number of loops – should quantify the devi ation from random graphs on Bethe-lattices. Consequently we deduce that the occupatio n probability at the percolation threshold is still small enough to apply the Bethe approxima tion. Yet, random graphs at pcare not exactly Bethe–like and contain a certain fraction of loops. Otherwise it would be impossible to distinguish su bclusters according to their connectivity within any considerable connected component . This, however, is likely to be necessary, to explain the role of the central part of idiotyp ic networks properly [13]. Further investigations concerning the structure of great c lusters will be made in Sec. V. V. DENSITY THRESHOLD AND THE COMPLETENESS OF THE IDIOTYPIC NETWORK Hitherto, our main interest was devoted to the question at wh ich occupation probability a great cluster starts to exist. If p, however, is further increased it is also imaginable that a situation occurs, where the whole system consists of one gre at cluster only. This is referred to as the question about the connectivity property of random graphs. In the theory of random graphs some general results that addr ess related problems have been derived for so called sequences of configuration spaces [24,25]. It can be shown that the sequence of one-mismatch-base graphs {G1 d}fulfills all requirements of these configurations spaces [30], due to its rather technical nature the proof wil l be omitted here. General results of [24,25] can be applied here showing that f or infinite systems there exists a threshold pconn= 1−lim d→∞|G1 d|−1/γd (22) (γdbeing the coordination number) with the property that almos t all random graphs are connected for p > p connwhile the set of all connected random graphs has measure zero for p < p conn. 9Moreover, for sequences of configuration spaces it holds tha t both the connectivity and the density treshold, i.e. the threshold for the property th at there is no non-occupied site without occupied neighbours on the base graph, coincide. Us ing (22) we find p(1) conn=p(1) dense= 1/2 (23) in case of one-mismatch-graphs and p(2) conn=p(2) dense= 0 (24) for two-mismatch graphs. Density of random graphs in our model can be directly transla ted into biological terms. Since antibodies and antigens are represented by the same se ts of bit chains the property that there is no free site without occupied neighbour means t hat every antigen is sure to encounter a complementary antibody. Hence the idiotypic ne twork is able to respond to any antigen. This is meant by the completeness axiom [7] for the i mmune system. Nevertheless it is somewhat difficult to reconcile the demand s for denseness of random graphs and occurance of small clusters at the same time. Howe ver, it seems unlikely that completeness should be understood in this strict way. Rathe r it appears to be a better solution to consider the fact, that evolution has most likel y driven the idiotypic network into such a kind of arrangement, that it is able to respond to v ariations of really existing antigen only. Thus we argue that completeness of the idiotyp ic network does not exactly match density of random graphs, but requires only the probab ility for the density of the cor- responding random graph to be somewhat below 1. So, random gr aphs could still comprise small clusters and be complete. Another paradoxon arises if two-mismatch graphs are consid ered. For those the connec- tivity and percolation thresholds p(2) candp(2) connfall together. How could then small clusters and a seperate great component coexist if all random graphs a re connected? Yet, for the case of finite systems it is clear that p(2) c(d)< p(2) conn(d), i.e. a great cluster has to be formed first, before it can devour his competing small rivals. Consequently, also for the case of two-mismatch-graphs the biologically interesting regime is well defined. For finite systems there is a range of occupati on probabilities p(2) c(d)< p < p(2) conn(d), where all requirements are met. Due to the fact that both pr obabilities p(2) c(d) and p(2) conn(d) are converging to zero in the limit d→ ∞ it follows that the extent of this range |p(2) c(d)−p(2) conn(d)|will also become very small for large systems. In the next Section our interest will be shifted towards the i ntrinsic structure of great clusters. Therefrom further conclusions about biological ly relevant parameter regimes can be drawn. VI. INTRINSIC STRUCTURE OF GREAT CLUSTERS Resuming results for percolation on mismatch-graphs from S ec. I-IV two phase transi- tions have been found to occur. The ranges below pc(since there is no great cluster) and above pconn(since there is only one great cluster) are of no interest con cerning the biologi- cal background of the model. The one great cluster–many smal l clusters situation between both, however, is likely to fulfill some requirements for idi otypic networks (see Sec. II). In 10this Section further investigations into the network struc ture within this parameter regime will be made. Insights into the structure of a great cluster can be obtaine d from the mass distribution of this cluster Mc(s) ={v∈C|d(v, c) =s}, i.e. the information, how many vertices have a certain distance sfrom a starting point c. Due to the equality of all starting points cwe define M(s) =1 |C|/summationdisplay c∈CMc(s) (25) and consider the mean value of M(s) calculated over all clusters, whose size exceeds a minimum value 0 .5×p×2d. For the metrics d(·,·) there are two distinguished choices, viz. metrics defined by (3) allowing paths in G=G1 d, i.e.d(·,·) =dG, and such restricting paths toCitself, i.e. d(·,·) =dC. Since dC> d Gwe confine our investigations to d(·,·) =dC which provides a better ‘resolution’. In the following we wi ll discuss some typical cluster compositions to obtain a survey of possible conclusions fro m mass distributions to cluster structures. Basically, three different situations could be imagined (fo r (i) and (iii) see Fig. 8). (i) A cluster could consist of some loosely clinged high conn ectivity regions (heaps), whose vertices are distinguished by a great number of connections with each other. Other vertices are bound with relatively few links. Clearly, strong connec tivity within heaps means, that vertices belonging to them have nearly the same distance fro m all other vertices. Thus, the presence of many heaps should result in a great number of loca l extrema, caused by ‘looking from all heaps’ to each other. On the other hand, loosely boun d vertices will smooth the mass distribution, i.e. reduce the sharpness of extrema. (ii) A cluster could contain no distinguished parts at all. F rom (6) we know that till s=Dmaxthe number of vertices is increasing with the distance s. For small occupation probabilities p < p conn(for which not the whole base-graph has been ‘conquered’ yet ) we expect a compromise between with sdeclining probabilities that a vertex of that cluster has distance sfrom an origin vand the increasing number of vertices with s. Consequently, the mass distribution should exhibit one maximum. For large p > p connmass distributions can simply be derived by multiplying (6) with p. (iii) As a special case of (i) a cluster could be made of one hea p and a certain fraction of loosely bound vertices. Then up to two maxima, caused by the h eaped vertex concentration and the competing tendencies (see (ii)), respectively, are likely to occur. The sharpness of both maxima will depend on the fraction of the loosely bound v ertices. Thus, in case of a large proportion of those vertices both extrema could be sm oothened to just one broad maximum. Fig. 9 shows normalized simulation results for the mass dist ribution for different values of p. Clearly, all distributions are marked by only one maximum, whose sharpness is increasing with growing values of p. Forp= 0.4 slightly below pconn= 0.5 similarities with (6) can be stated. Hence clusters are then already stretched over the w hole extent of the base-graph. More interestingly, for small p’s in the vicinity of the percolation threshold relatively broad maxima occur, which could be an indication for cluster structures as described in (iii). To prove the validity of this hypothesis we have applied the e dge-elimination algorithm (see Sec. II) to great clusters. As a slight extension of the d escribed procedure all fractioning 11edges are removed, thus splitting a cluster Cinto the sequence of its doubly connected components, or heaps in the above sense, ( C1, ..., C t). Obviously, vertices belonging to doubly connected components are distinguished by their str ong cliquishness in comparison to other vertices. Thus, the number of such components tshould allow to distinguish between the situations (i)-(iii). Fig. 10 shows simulation data for the mean value /an}bracketle{tt/an}bracketri}htof the resulting non-trivial parts after edge-elimination depending on p. The distribution is marked by one maximum, which is again a consequence of two competing tendencies. For smal l values of pclusters are generally not doubly connected, but increasing pleads to a larger proportion of vertices that belong to loops. On the other hand, there is a tendency that lo ops get connected by loops, i.e., seperate doubly connected cluster components are gro wing together. Thus, for large p almost every cluster will consist of one doubly connected co mponent only. Results of Fig. 10 show also that the maximum is reached sligh ly above the percolation threshold pc. Then, the number of doubly connected parts tis rapidly declining till it asymptotically approaches t= 1 for p→1. We argue that this behaviour is caused by one great doubly connected component which occurs first for s omep> ≈pcand then gradually incorporates all other doubly connected parts. In principl e, these results do also apply to two-mismatch graphs (see Fig. 11). Comparing this with the above described scenario of cluster structures, we can thus state that there is a range of values of p> ≈pcwhere (iii) applies, i.e. clusters are made of one great doubly connected component (including several small ones) and a set of other loosley bound vertices. Accordingly, within this range of pwe define two subsets of great clusters C, namely the great doubly connected component B=C(2)and the complementary set P=C−B. As already discussed in Sec. I, the central part of idiotypic networks (corresponding to great clusters C) should contain strongly and weakly connected distinguish ed subsets. From the previous analysis it becomes clear, that there is a choic e of the only parameter p, where bit-string models can exactly reproduce such a situation. VII. CONCLUSIONS We investigated statistical properties of a bit-string bas ed model for idiotypic networks and compared typical architectures of the thus defined netwo rk with axioms and hypotheses for idiotypic networks from theoretical biology. Before in troducing randomness we undertook an analysis of the underlying base graphs to show a major diffe rence to standard percolation problems which bases on the way how the size of the system is in creased. In the following the expressed antibody repertoire was iden tified with graphs, created by randomly occupying a matching rule defined base structure (base graphs). Concepts of percolation theory have been applied in order to determine t he percolation threshold. The immune system is a very large, yet finite system. Conseque ntly, finite size corrections have to be taken in account. Series expansion techniques all owed the calculation of two critical exponents (for finite systems and in the limit d→ ∞) that charactarize the scaling behaviour. A regime of values for the parameter p > p chas been found where random graphs consist of many small clusters and one great connecte d component. For choices p> ≈pc our model reproduces the peripheral/central part concepti on for idiotypic networks. 12The translation of the notation of the completeness of idiot ypic networks into the lan- guage of graph theory allowed the determination of an upper t hreshold pdensefor the oc- curance of the many small clusters–one great cluster situat ion. Furthermore, relying on general results of the theory of random graphs (for so-calle d sequences of configuration spaces) we calculated the – in this case coinciding – thresho lds for the density ( pdense) and the connectivity ( pconn) properties. Furthermore, we developed techniques to obtain additional information about the struc- ture of great clusters. Analysing random graphs for p> ≈pcgreat clusters can be decomposed into two subsets of vertices with different binding properti es, namely groups of doubly con- nected vertices (backbone) and loosely linked vertices (pe ripheral part of the great cluster). Thus, bit-string models are suited to describe a hierarchy o f connectivity levels, that really existing idiotypic networks are also expected to exh ibit. Our results support to some extent idealized architectures used in a mean field type mode l to describe the dynamics of the central part of the immune system [13]. Contrary to other model approaches [8,26–29] for topologies of idiotypic networks our simple few paramet ric bit-string model produces a non-trivial seemingly realistic network topology, witho ut assuming a priori distinguished vertex groups. APPENDIX A: RENORMALIZATION GROUP APPROACH In this appendix we want to present an alternative method to c alculate the connectivity threshold for one-mismatch-graphs. Though knowing the exa ct result from graph theory an extension of ideas of the renormalization group theory to th ese special graphs seems to bear a new feature, which we want to briefly amend here. Our approach bases on the idea of the renormalization of smal l cells [31] which employs the self similarity of the system on different length scales a t the percolation threshold. A condition to apply this procedure is that an appropriate gro uping of sites on the original lattice leads to a renormalized lattice with the same symmet ry properties as the original one. Here, treating not a real space lattice but a functional networks, we adapt the idea of the renormalization group theory in the following way. We fin d a transformation Rwhich, by grouping of vertices, leads from the one-mismatch base gr aphG1 d+2in dimension d+2 to a graph R(G1 d+2) which is equivalent to the base graph G1 din dimension d,R(G1 d+2)≃G1 d, thus allowing a systematic reduction of the degrees of freed om. If a – for finite systems appropriately defined – threshold pro perty, namely pconn(d), converges to a certain value for d→ ∞, differences between pdandpd−2must be small and will disappear in the limit of infinite systems. Consequentl y, if a grouping of vertices to super vertices on a graph Gyields a renormalized graph R(G) of the same type, percolation thresholds on both graphs will be the same. Thus, we replace t he term symmetry (as it is applied to lattices) by equivalency of graphs. We encode an arbitrary vertex of the base graph G1 d+2by (A, b0, b1) where Ais a bit chain of length dandb0,b1are single bits. Every vertex on G1 d+2belongs to a unique 4-loop {(A, b0, b1),(A,b0, b1),(A,b0,b1),(A, b0,b1)}connected by one-mismatch links. The renormalization Rreplaces this 4-loop by the ‘super’vertex ( A) onR(G1 d+2) (of course the choice of ( A) leads to identical results). If two vertices AandBare connected by an inversion (one-mismatch) link on G1 dthe vertices of the corresponding 4-loops on G1 d+2are connected by 4 inversion (one-mismatch) links, too, cf. Fig. 12. 13We thus define a renormalized graph R(G1 d+2) composed of the above explained vertices and edges. It follows directly from our construction that R(G1 d+2) is equivalent to G1 d. To describe random graphs we apply the following majority ru le: a super vertex on G1 d is considered as occupied if at least two connected vertices of the corresponding 4-loop on G1 d+2are occupied, i.e. this 4-loop is said to percolate. On the ba sis of this rule we obtain p′= 4p2(1−p)2+ 4p3(1−p) +p4, (A1) where p′denotes the (renormalized) probability that vertices of ( G) are occupied if vertices onGwere diced with probability p. Calculating fixed points of eq. (A1) we obtain p∗= 0, (3+ −√ 5)/2, and 1. Thus, as the only unstable solution in [0 ,1] we have p∗= (3−√ 5)/2 as a first approximation for the connectivity threshold. At this place one could pose the question whether only 4-loop s are suited as a renormal- ization cell. Indeed, it is also possible to summarize succu ssive renormalization steps to a single great one, ordinary hypercubes of even dimension k < d form suitable cells as well. On the other hand, condensing odd dimensional hypercubes to super vertices does not lead to renormalized graphs R(G) that are equivalent to other base graphs of the sequence {G1 d}. Altogether, this seems to be an effect of differences between e ven and odd-dimensional base graphs (see Sec. II). Of course, renormalizing small cells entails some approxim ation. Grouping together vertices and applying a majority rule to occupy the renormal ized vertices, situations can arise where clusters on the original lattice are cut or new cl usters are formed [31]. There are different approaches to improve the involved appro ximations. One possibility suggested in [32] which leads to exact results in the limit of very large cells is to summarize some elementary cells to one large cell of size z. This large cell will then be occupied if all elementary cells are occupied and connected, i.e. are said t o percolate. Since ’renormaliza- tion faults’ are essentially due to cell surface effects impr ovements produced by the above method emanate from the declining surface-volume ratio of l arge cells. For one-mismatch graphs it holds, however, that the surface size of a cell s(z) depends logarithmically on z, viz.s(z)≈d+ 1−log2zleading to only slight improvements with increasing z. Using larger elementary cells consisting of two coupled 4-l oops we obtain (p′)2=p8+ 8p7q+ 24p6q2+ 32p5q3+ 12p4q4, (A2) using four coupled 4-loops yields (p′)4=p16+ 16p15q+ 112p14q2+ 448p13q3+ 1120 p12q4+ + 1792 p11q5+ 1776 p10q6+ 1008 p9q7+ 180p8q8(A3) where q= 1−p. As fixed points p′=pof (A2) and (A3) we determined numerically p≈0.41 and p≈0.39, respectively. The difference of both values to pconn= 0.5 may be a consequence of the above mentioned slow convergence. More interestingly, our renormalization procedure of repl acing hypercubes of dimension kby super vertices is without modifications applicable to ord inary hypercubes as well. This gives an additional argument that the connectivity thresho lds of both sequences of graphs are equal which can also be verified by evaluating eq. (22). 14REFERENCES [1] N.K. Jerne, Ann. Immunol. (Inst. Pasteur) 125 C , 373-389 (1974). [2] P. J. Ruiz et al., Nature Medicine 6, 710-712 (1998). [3] C.A. Bona, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 213, 32-42 (1998). [4] R.J. de Boer, A.U. Neumann, A.S. Perelson, L.A. Segel, an d G. Weissbuch, in Mathe- matics Applied to Biology and Medicine (Wuerz Publishing, Winnipeg, 1993), pp. 243- 258. [5] A.S. Perelson, in Cell to Cell signalling: From Experiments to Theoretical Mo dels(Aca- demic Press, 1989), 261-271. [6] A. Coutinho, Immunol. Rev. 110, 63-81 (1989). [7] A.S. Perelson and G. Weisbuch, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1219-1267 (1997). [8] A. Neumann and G. Weisbuch, Bull. Math. Biol. 54, 699-726 (1992). [9] K. Lippert and U. Behn, in Ann. Rev. Comp. Phys. , Vol. V, edited by D. Stauffer (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), 287-311. [10] K. Lippert, Dissertation, Universit¨ at Leipzig (1994 ). [11] I.R. Cohen, Immunology Today 12, 490-494 (1992). [12] F.J. Varela and A. Coutinho, Immunology Today 5, 159-165 (1991). [13] B. Sulzer, J.L. van Hemmen, and U. Behn, Bull. of Math. Bi ology56, 1009-1040 (1994). [14] J.D. Farmer, N.H. Packard, and A.S. Perelson, Physica D 22, 187-204 (1986). [15] A.S. Perelson and G.F. Oster, J. Theor. Biol. 81, 645-670 (1979). [16] D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Perkolationstheorie: eine Einf¨ uhrung (VCH, Wein- heim,1995). [17] I.A. Campbell, J-M. Flesselles, R. Jullien, and R.Bote t Phys. Rev. B 37, 3825-3828 (1988). [18] J. Stewart and F.J. Varela, Immunol. Rev. 110, 37-61 (1989). [19] F.J. Kearney and M.Vakil, N. Nicholson, In: Evolution and vertebrate immunity: The antigen receptor and MHC gene families , edited by G. Kelsoe and D. Schulze, (Austin Texas, 1987), 175-190. [20] M.E. Fisher and J.W. Essam, J. Math. Phys. 2, 609-619 (1960). [21] D.S. Gaunt, M.F. Sykes, and H. Ruskin, J. Phys. A 9, 1899-1911 (1976) [22] B. Bollob´ as, Random Graphs (Academic Press, London, 1985). [23] M. Cheon, M. Heo, I. Chang, and D. Stauffer, Phys. Rev. E 59, 4733-4736 (1999). [24] C. Reidys, PhD thesis, Friedrich–Schiller–Universit ¨ at Jena (1995). [25] C. Reidys, P. F. Stadler, and P. Schuster, Bull. Math. Bi ol.59, 339-397 (1997). [26] G.R. Weisbuch, R. De Boer, and A.S. Perelson, J. Theor. B iol.146, 483-499 (1990). [27] A. Neumann and G. Weisbuch, Bull. Math. Biol. 54, 21-44 (1992). [28] R.W. Anderson, A. Neumann, and S. Perelson, Bull. Math. Biol.55, 1091-1131 (1993). [29] P.H. Richter, Eur. J. Immunol. 5, 350-354 (1975). [30] M. Brede, Master Thesis, Universit¨ at Leipzig (1999). [31] P.J. Reynolds, H.E. Stanley, and W. Klein, Phys. Rev. Le tt.10, L167-L172 (1977). [32] P.J. Reynolds, H.E. Stanley, and W. Klein, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1223-1245 (1980). 15FIGURES FIG. 1. Comparison between a hypercube (left side) and the on e-mismatch base graph (right side) which have the same set of vertices ( d= 3). Solid lines connect perfectly complementary vertices, dashed lines mean one-mismatch links. FIG. 2. One-mismatch base graph in d= 5. Same notation as in Fig. 1. 02e+094e+096e+098e+091e+10 0 5 10 15 20mass distance sd=34 d=35 FIG. 3. Mass distribution for base graphs of even ( d= 34) and odd ( d= 35) dimension. Points have been connected to guide the eyes. 1600.000050.00010.000150.00020.000250.0003 0 20 40 60 80 100p(|C|) cluster size |C|p=0.3 p=0.2 p=0.1 FIG. 4. Cluster size distribution depending on the occupati on probability p= 0.1,0.2,0.3 for base graphs in 8 dimensions. The histogram was taken over 105configurations. 1e-081e-071e-061e-050.00010.0010.01 1 10 100p(|C|) cluster size |C|d=10,p=0.112 d=14,p=0.08 FIG. 5. Cluster size distribution on G1 10andG1 14at the percolation thresholds. The simulation data are plotted on doubly logarithmic scales. 1e-071e-061e-050.00010.0010.01 1 10 100p(|C|) cluster size |C|d=12, p=0.013 d=10, p=0.017 FIG. 6. Illustration of finite size scaling laws for the two-m ismatch-graphs G2 10andG2 12. Data sets are plotted on doubly logarithmic scales. 171 1 10 100f cluster size |C| FIG. 7. Simulation results for the fragmentation rate fonG1 10depending on the cluster size |C|atpc≈0.112. Data are plotted on doubly logarithmic scales. Fitting a power law (dashed line) yields λ≈0.12. FIG. 8. Visualization of different cluster structures. The c ircles symbolize strongly connected subclusters (heaps). Left hand side: the cluster consists o f several weakly connected heaps. Right hand side: The cluster contains one heap only. 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30mass (normalized) distance d Gp=0.4 p=0.3 p=0.2 p=0.15 p=0.1 FIG. 9. Simulation results for the mass distribution on G1 9for varying probabilities p= 0.1,0.15,0.2,0.3,0.4. In order to make results for different p’s comparable on same scales masses have been divided by the cluster size |C|. Points have been connected to guide the eyes. 1811.11.21.31.41.51.61.7 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4<t> p FIG. 10. Mean value /an}bracketle{tt/an}bracketri}htof the resulting great fragments after application of the edge-elimination procedure for G1 9depending on the occupation probability p. 0246810121416 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25<t> pd=6 d=8 d=10 FIG. 11. Mean value /an}bracketle{tt/an}bracketri}htof the resulting great fragments for the two-mismatch-grap hsG2 6,G2 8 andG2 10depending on p. Except a shift towards smaller values of pthe results are similar to those on one-mismatch-graphs R /B4/BU/B5/B4/BT/B5 /B4 /BU /BN /BC /BN /BC/B5 /B4 /BU /BN /BD /BN /BC/B5/B4 /BT/BN /BD /BN /BC/B5 /B4 /BT/BN /BC /BN /BC/B5 /B4 /BU /BN /BD /BN /BD/B5/B4 /BT/BN /BC /BN /BD/B5 /B4 /BU /BN /BC /BN /BD/B5/B4 /BT/BN /BD /BN /BD/B5 FIG. 12. Illustration of the renormalization procedure app lied to a pair of connected 4-loops on G1 d+2leading to a pair of linked super vertices on G1 d. IfdH(B,A) = 0 the dotted edges correspond to inversion links, if dH(B,A) = 1 to one-mismatch links. 19

arXiv:physics/0006016v1 [physics.atom-ph] 7 Jun 2000Bound states of negatively charged ions induced by a magneti c field Victor G. Bezchastnov, Peter Schmelcher, and Lorenz S. Cede rbaum Theoretische Chemie, Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut, Universit¨ at Heidelberg, INF 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany (February 2, 2008) We analyse the bound states of negatively charged ions which were predicted to exist because of the presence of a magnetic field by Avron et al[1]. We confirm that the number of such states is infinite in the approximation of an in finitely heavy nucleus and provide insight into the underlying physical picture by mea ns of a combined adiabatic and perturbation theoretical approach. We also calculate the c orresponding binding energies which are qualitatively different for the states with vanish ing and non-vanishing angular momentum. An outlook on the case of including center of mass e ffects is presented. I. INTRODUCTION The behaviour and properties of negative ions became during the past years a branch of intense research. There exists an enormous interest in the electronic structu re and dynamics of negative ions, both from the theoretical as well as experimental point of view (see, e .g., the review [2] and the references therein). According to our present knowledge about atomic ions it is mo st likely that singly charged negative ions possess in the absence of a magnetic field only one stable ground-state configuration. For example for the H−ion, this state is the 11Selectronic state, and a rigorous proof that this the only pos sible bound state was given in [3]. Also, some atoms, like for examp le Be, N, Ne, Mg, Ar do not possess any stable negative ion state (see, e.g., [4,5]). On the other ha nd, one can expect that in the presence of a magnetic field a lot of new discrete energy states of negative ions can appear. This expectation is based on the statement that for any negatively charged ion the numb er of discrete energy states is infinite in the presence of a magnetic field [1]. However, this statement was formulated as the conclusion of a formal mathematical treatment which does not provide a transparen t physical picture of the appearance of the infinite sequence of bound states nor does it estimate the cor responding energies. Although a wide set of works was focused on the influence of the magnetic field on lo w-lying ion states (e.g., [6–12]), there is no systematic treatment of the highly excited anions predic ted in [1]. In the present paper we develop a physical approach showing transparently from which quantu m mechanical grounds the infinite sequence of bound anion states appears in the presence of a magnetic fie ld. In Section 2, we first reduce the problem to a one-particle, and then to a one-dimensional one , where to analyse the bonding one has to consider the motion of the external electron along the magne tic field in an effective potential depending on the quantum state. We confirm that, in the approximation of the static (infinitely heavy) nucleus, the number of the bound states is infinite, and derive estimat es for the corresponding binding energies valid for arbitrary ions. In Section 3, we apply these estima tes to the ion H−and verify them treating the one-dimensional motion of the external electron numeri cally. We also discuss the bound states of an exotic ion formed by attaching the muon to the hydrogen ato m. Besides, we analyse the importance of the non-adiabatic coupling between the states of the exte rnal and atomic (core) electrons. A general discussion and concluding remarks are given in Section 4. 1II. GENERAL It is well-known (see, e.g., [4,13]) that the electron affinit ies for the negative ions are usually much smaller than the binding energies of the corresponding neut rals. This fact implies that the extra electron is weakly bound to the atom and its behaviour and properties s trongly differ from that of internal (core) electrons. For the H−−ion, the binding of the extra electron is exclusively due to c orrelation between the two electrons. In the following we will study the highly e xcited states of the negative ions which appear in the presence of a magnetic field and which, as we will estimate, correspond to very small electron affinities. We therefore use the approximation of a w eakly bound external electron neglecting its exchange interaction with the core electrons. To exploit su ch a model, it is convenient to split the total Hamiltonian for a singly negatively charged ion into three t erms, Hion=Hat+He+W. (1) Here the first term, Hat=1 2meZ/summationdisplay a=1/bracketleftBig pa+e cAa/bracketrightBig2 +U+ 2µBBΣ (2) describes a neutral atom with infinitely heavy nucleus in a ma gnetic field Bwith the vector potential Aa=A(ra). Summation is carried out over all the atomic (core) electr ons labelled with the subscript “a”,Zis the nucleus charge number, meand−e=−|e|<0 are the electron mass and charge. The potential energy Uincludes the Coulomb energies of the interaction of the core electrons with each other and with the nucleus. Σis the total spin of the atom, and µB=e¯h/(2mec) is the Bohr magneton. The second term in (1), He=1 2me/bracketleftBig p+e cA/bracketrightBig2 + 2µBBσ, (3) corresponds to an extra (with respect to the atom) electron, σis the electron spin. The last term, W=Z/summationdisplay a=1e2 |r−ra|−Ze2 r, (4) describes the Coulomb coupling of the extra electron to the a tom. When the extra electron is weakly bound to the atom, the chara cter of its motion differs strongly from that of the core electrons. In particular, the external elec tron can be assumed to move much slower than the core ones. In this case, the ion states can be success fully described in terms of a quasimolecular approach, and the problem of binding can even be reduced to a o ne-particle one. Below we briefly describe this approach. A. Quasimolecular approach to the problem of binding Let us consider the Hamiltonian H′ at=Hat+W. (5) It does not include the kinetic energy of the external electr on, therefore the latter can be considered as static in space, so H′ atdescribes the motion of the core electrons only. Since the po tential energy term 2ofH′ atdepends parametrically on the position rof the external electron, the energy spectrum of this Hamiltonian as well as the corresponding eigenfunctions al so depend on r. Let us denote them by E′ i(r) =∝angbracketlefti|H′ at|i∝angbracketright (6) andφi(r1,r2,...,rZ;r), respectively, where the index ilabels the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian H′ at with some choice of r. Since at any rthe states |i∝angbracketrightcompose a complete basis set, an eigenfunction of the total Hamiltonian (1) can be presented as Ψ(r1,r2,...,rZ;r) =/summationdisplay i′ψi′(r)φi′(r1,r2,...,rZ;r), (7) with the expansion coefficients ψk′(r) depending on the position of the external electron. It shou ld be noted that this wave function is not completely antisymmetr ic with respect to all the ion electrons, only its “atomic part”, φi′can be assumed to be properly antisymmetric with respect to t he core electrons. Complete antisymmetrisation would significantly complica te the further consideration. On the other hand, the main yield of such a complication would be taking in to account exchange interaction between the external and core electrons which is definitely negligib le for states for which the external electron is localized far from the atom. Notice also that the form (7) of t he ion wave function is exact if another charged particle different from the electron (like for examp le a muon) is attached to the atom. Substituting the wave function (7) into the Schr¨ odinger eq uation with the Hamiltonian (1), subse- quently multiplying from the left-hand side by φ∗ iand integrating over the positions of the core electrons we will arrive at the set of coupled equations [He+E′ i(r) +hii(r)−Etot]ψi(r) =−/summationdisplay i′/negationslash=ihi i′ψi′(r). (8) HereEtotis the total eigenenergy of the system, and the matrix elemen tshi i′are given by the following equation hi i′=1 2me∝angbracketleftφ∗ i|p2φi′∝angbracketright+eB 2mec∝angbracketleftφ∗ i|lφi′∝angbracketright+1 me∝angbracketleftφ∗ i|pφi′∝angbracketrightp, (9) where l=r×pis the angular momentum of the external electron. Notice tha t if bothiandi′relate to the ground state of the atom, |0∝angbracketright, then the last two terms in Eq. (9) equal zero while the first te rm can be transformed as follows h00=¯h2 2me/integraldisplay dr1/integraldisplay dr2.../integraldisplay drZ/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle∂ ∂rφ(r1,r2,...,rZ;r)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 . (10) In the following we restrict ourself by considering the atta chment of the extra electron to the neutral atom in the ground state. In this case, the right-hand side of Eq. (8) is associated with the coupling between the ground and excited states of the core electrons d ue to the motion of the external electron. Assuming the ground state of the neutral atom to be energetic ally well-separated from the excited states this coupling can be neglected. Then Eq. (8) becomes essenti ally a one-particle Schr¨ odinger equation, [He+V0(r) +h00(r)−E0]ψ0(r) = 0, (11) where, for the sake of convenience, we have shifted the energ ies by the ground state energy of the isolated atom,E(0) 0=E′ 0(r→ ∞), and introduced E0=Etot−E(0) 0 (12) 3and V0(r) =E′ 0(r)−E(0) 0. (13) Equation (11) describes the motion of the external electron in the magnetic field and the potential which consists of two parts: the static term, V0(r), and the non-adiabatic (dynamic) correction, h00(r). The latter, as we shall directly estimate for the H−−ion, decreases with increasing rfaster than V(r) and can be neglected at distances exceeding the atomic size. Theref ore, to analyse the binding mechanism for the excited ion states one has to solve the Schr¨ odinger equatio n [He+V(r)−E]ψ(r) = 0, (14) where for brevity we have omitted the index “0” related to the ground state of the core electrons. At distances of the extra electron from the atom strongly exc eeding the atom size, one can consider the operator (4) as a perturbation of the atom and evaluate it by the multipole expansion, W=−e/parenleftbiggDn r2−Qαβnαnβ 2r3+.../parenrightbigg , (15) where n=r/ris the unit vector in the direction of rand the indices αandβrun over the Cartesian coordinates. D=−eZ/summationdisplay a=1ra (16) and Qαβ=−eZ/summationdisplay a=1/parenleftbig r2 aδαβ−3xaαxaβ/parenrightbig (17) are the operators of the dipole and quadrupole momenta of the atom, respectively, xaαandxaβdenote the components of ra,ra= (xa1,xa2,xa3). Then the potential in Eq. (14) can be approximated as V(r) =−e∝angbracketleftD∝angbracketrightn r2+e∝angbracketleftQαβ∝angbracketrightnαnβ 2r3−e2καβnαnβ 2r4, (18) where ∝angbracketleftD∝angbracketrightand∝angbracketleftQαβ∝angbracketrightare the mean values of the dipole and quadrupole momenta, res pectively, of the unperturbed atom described by the Hamiltonian (2), and καβis the polarizability of the atom in an electric field. The first two terms in (18) represent the first- order perturbation corrections. The last term in (18) is the second-order correction, it corresponds to th e dipole term in (15) treated as the perturbation of the atom by the electric field E=−en/r2. Expression (18) can be further simplified if we take into acco unt that the potential (13) has its symmetry axes directed along the magnetic field. A simple argumentati on of this statement is the following. In the presence of the magnetic field it is natural to assume that the axis of quantization for the atom is directed along B. Then the potential (13) depends parametrically on the two v ectors, Bandr. Since the potential is scalar it must depend only on scalars which c an be constructed from these vectors. These scalars are B2,r2andBr. This means that if Bis directed along the z−axes, thenV(r) =V(r⊥,z). As a result the non-zero components of the mean dipole and qua drupole momenta of the neutral atom can only be ∝angbracketleftDz∝angbracketright,∝angbracketleftQxx∝angbracketright=∝angbracketleftQyy∝angbracketrightand∝angbracketleftQzz∝angbracketright, respectively. Also, the polarizability takes the diagona l form with the components κxx=κyy=κ⊥andκzz=κ/bardbl. Furthermore, since the z−parity of the core 4electrons is the integral of motion when they are not perturb ed by the interaction with the external electron, we have ∝angbracketleftDz∝angbracketright= 0. Then Eq. (18) can be transformed as follows: V(r⊥,z) =e2λ(2z2−r2 ⊥) 2r5−/parenleftbig κ⊥sin2ϑ+κ/bardblcos2ϑ/parenrightbige2 2r4, (19) whereϑis the angle between nandBand the coefficient λcan be expressed in terms of the mean values of the squares of the longitudinal and transverse coordinat es of the core electrons of the unperturbed atom, λ=Z/summationdisplay a=1/bracketleftbig 2∝angbracketleftz2 a∝angbracketright − ∝angbracketleftr2 a⊥∝angbracketright/bracketrightbig . (20) B. Binding in a magnetic field as 1D problem The Hamiltonian that determines the one-particle Schr¨ odi nger equation (14) explicitly reads Heff=p2 z 2me+π2 ⊥ 2me+V(r⊥,z), (21) where π⊥=p⊥+e 2cB×r⊥ (22) is the transverse kinetic momentum of the electron. We have i ntroduced the symmetric gauge of the vector potential, A= (1/2)B×r, being the most appropriate one because of the axial symmetr y of the potentialV. We also have omitted the spin part of the Hamiltonian which d etermines the trivial shift of the ion energy spectrum and does not affect the binding energi es. Since the potential in the Hamiltonian (21) decreases rapid ly with increasing distance of the extra electron from the atom, even quite a weak magnetic field can in fluence the transverse motion of the extra electron to a much larger extent than the atomic potent ial. In this case the eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian (21) can be efficiently expanded in terms of the th e Landau states, ∝angbracketleftr⊥|n,s∝angbracketright, of the motion of the electron across the magnetic field. These states are th e common eigenstates of the operators π2 ⊥ andlz, where l=r×pis the electron angular momentum, and labeled with the two qu antum numbers, nands, that determine the corresponding eigenvalues, π2 ⊥= (¯h/am)2(2n+ 1), n= 0,1,2,..., lz=−¯hs , s =−n,−n+ 1,−n+ 2,..., (23) am=/radicalbig c¯h/(eB) is the magnetic length. The first eigenvalue determines the Landau energy spectrum ELan n=π2 ⊥ 2me=¯heB mec/parenleftbigg n+1 2/parenrightbigg . (24) Hencenis called the electron Landau level number. Because of the axial symmetry of the atomic potential the lon gitudinal component of the electron angular momentum is an integral of motion for the Hamiltonia n (21), [lz,Heff] = 0, and the quantum numberscan be used to label the eigenstates of Heff, i.e.E=Es. The expansion of the corresponding eigenfunctions over the Landau states thus involves only di fferent Landau level numbers and reads 5ψs(r) =/summationdisplay ngns(z)∝angbracketleftr⊥|n,s∝angbracketright. (25) The expansion coefficients gns(z) and the energy Ecan be found by solving the system of coupled equations, /bracketleftbiggp2 z 2me+V(s) nn(z) +ELan n−Es/bracketrightbigg gns(z) =−/summationdisplay n′/negationslash=nV(s) nn′(z)gn′s(z), n= 0,1,2,..., (26) where V(s) nn′(z) =∝angbracketleftn,s|V(r⊥,z)|n′,s∝angbracketright (27) are the effective longitudinal potentials obtained as the ma trix elements of the atomic potential V(r⊥,z) within the space of the Landau states of the external electro n. The quantity ELan 0= ¯hωB/2, whereωB=eB/(mec) is the electron cyclotron frequency, determines the continuum threshold for the states of the external electron . The states of this electron belong to different manifolds associated with the different Landau energies ELan n,n= 0,1,2,.... The bound states can be classified by the numbers ( s,n,ν ) whereνequals the number of nodes of the function gns(z) for the leading term in the expansion (25) - such a classification is s imilar to that used in treating hydrogen-like atoms in a strong magnetic field, see, e.g., [14]. We can expect (and our results for the ion H−confirm this), that the binding energies for the ionic states induced by the presence of the magnetic field are small compared to the electron cyclotron energy, ¯hωB. Therefore, all such states associated with the manifolds n= 1,2,...lie in the continuum, i.e. are not bound. We thus will focus on the states related to the grou nd Landau manifold, n= 0. While treating them we can further neglect the coupling of the grou nd Landau manifold to the higher ones, e.g., omit the sum on the right-hand side of Eq. (26). This app roach yields the 1D Schr¨ odinger equation, /bracketleftbiggp2 z 2me+Vs(z)−εs/bracketrightbigg gs(z) = 0, (28) which describes the motion of the external electron along th e magnetic field. In this equation, we have shifted the energy by the zero-point Landau energy, εs=Es−ELan 0. (29) Then, when εsis negative, the value of −εsis the binding energy of the external electron. Also, for bre vity we have omitted the index n= 0 and define the effective longitudinal potential by Vs(z) =V(s) 00(z). In order to get an idea of the binding properties of this potenti al one can use the weak coupling one- dimensional theory (see, e.g., [15]). This theory says that if the potential vanishes at |z| → ∞ and the integral Is=/integraldisplay∞ −∞Vs(z)dz (30) is negative than there is at least one bound state of finite lon gitudinal motion, and the estimate of the corresponding binding energy for that state is −εs=meI2 s/(2¯h2). (31) As we shall see, the condition Is<0 holds for infinitely many possible quantum numbers sand thus the number of bound states associated with different values of sis infinite, in accordance with the conclusion 6of [1]. For each s, the estimate (31) gives the binding energy for the state for which the longitudinal part of the wave function of the external electron has no nodes, e. g.ν= 0. To exploit the latter analytical approach let us introduce t he transverse probability density for the states related to the ground Landau manifold ρs(r⊥) =/integraldisplay2π 0dϕ|∝angbracketleftr⊥|n= 0,s∝angbracketright|2=1 s!a2m/parenleftbiggr2 ⊥ 2a2m/parenrightbiggs exp/parenleftbigg −r2 ⊥ 2a2m/parenrightbigg , (32) where the integration is done over the electron azimuthal an gle. In terms of the density (32) and the atomic potential V(r⊥,z) we have Is=/integraldisplay∞ 0r⊥dr⊥ρs(r⊥)/integraldisplay∞ −∞dzV(r⊥,z). (33) Let us now adopt an approximation of the atomic potential giv en by Eq. (19) for large distances. It is easy to check that at any r⊥∝negationslash= 0 /integraldisplay∞ 0/parenleftbig 2z2−r2 ⊥/parenrightbig dz (r2 ⊥+z2)5/2= 0 (34) and thus the first, quadrupole, term in (19) does not contribu te intoIs. This implies that the polarization part of the atomic potential plays a key role in binding the ex ternal electron. Let us further assume that the influence of the magnetic field on the atomic polarizabili ty is negligible. As it is known [16], in the absence of the magnetic field an atom in the ground state of the zero total angular momentum has an isotropic polarizability, κ, i.e. we assume κ⊥≈κ/bardbl≈κ. Then the polarization term in (19) is net attractive and the condition Is<0 is fulfilled. Straightforward integration in Eq. (33) and u se of the relation (31) gives −εs=π2κ2 27(s!)2Γ2/parenleftbigg s−1 2/parenrightbigg Ryγ3, (35) where Γ is the complete gamma-function, Ry = mee4/(2¯h2),γ=a2 m/a2 0=B/B 0, andB0= 2.35×105T. This estimate is not appropriate for s= 0 because of the divergence of the integrations at the origi n r⊥=z= 0 for the potential (19). However, for s >0 above value of the binding energy is a good approximation for γ≪1 (laboratory magnetic fields) since the main contribution t o the integral comes from distances sufficiently larger than a0, the natural measure of the size of the neutral atom. Using atomic units (2Ry for the energy and B0for the magnetic field strength) we rewrite Eq. (35) in a recur rent way, −εs= 0.1211κ2B3δ2 s, s= 1,2,..., (36) where δ1= 1, δs= [1−(1.5/s)]δs−1, s= 2,3,... . (37) One should notice that the scaling behaviour of the binding e nergies with the magnetic field strength, −εs∝B3, coincides with that predicted in [1]. Also, at large swe haveδs≈s−3/2and thus obtain the behaviour of the binding energies for large s,−εs∝s−3. Such a sharp decrease of the binding energy with the quantum number reflects the fact that in the plane perpend icular to the magnetic field the external 7electron follows the Landau orbit with the expectation valu e for the radius squared ∝angbracketleftr2 ⊥∝angbracketright= 2(s+ 1)a2 m, and at large sthe transverse probability density (32) becomes a peaked fu nction ofr2 ⊥centered around r2 ⊥=∝angbracketleftr2 ⊥∝angbracketright. Therefore, as sincreases the external electron is bound to the atom at progr essively larger distances from it. We can also establish the behaviour of the binding energy wit h the magnetic field strength for the states= 0. In this case, contrary to the limit of large s, the transverse probability density varies very slowly with r⊥and the scale on which it reduces significantly from its maxim al value at r⊥= 0 is the magnetic length, am, which strongly exceeds the atomic potential scale, a0. Therefore, when calculating the integral (33) we can replace the transverse probability density by its maximal value, ρs(0) = 1/a2 m. In this way we obtain −ε0=1 2/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay∞ 0r⊥dr⊥/integraldisplay+∞ −∞dzV(r⊥,z)/bracketrightbigg2 B2, (38) where we have used atomic units again as in the remaining part of our work. We remark that the domain of the neutral atomic core contributes quite significantly t o the integrations in (38) and thus the use of the quasimolecular (adiabatic) picture to describe the m otion of the extra electron becomes a crude approximation. However, a more accurate treatment is expec ted to change only the numerical coefficient in Eq. (38). The scaling behaviour of the binding energy with respect to the field strength is expected to be the same, i.e. −ε0∝B2. III. BINDING ENERGIES OF THE H−AND H µ−IONS The approach developed in the previous Section can be direct ly applied to the H−−ion. With a good accuracy we can neglect the influence of the magnetic field on t he ground state of the core electron, and use the well-known value (see, e.g., [17]), κ= 9/2, for the polarizability of such a configuration. Then the estimate (36) gives −εs= 2.453B3δ2 s. (39) More reliable results for the binding energies for the state s of the electron attached to the hydrogen atom which are induced by the presence of the magnetic field, i ncluding the state s= 0, can be obtained if one knows the atomic potential V. When the influence of the magnetic field on the hydrogen atom i s neglected this potential is spherically symmetric, V=V(r), and can be found in the literature. We use the results of Walles, Herman and Milnes [18] who rigorously calculated the energy levels of an electron moving in the field of two fixed, at distance rfrom each other, charges + eand−eusing the separability of the problem in confocal elliptic coordinates. Their elec tronic ground state energy, EWHM, is directly related to our potential V(r), V(r) =EWHM(r)−1 r+ 0.5, (40) when adding the Coulomb interaction energy between the two s tatic charges and the hydrogenic ground- state binding energy (cf. Eq. (13)). The energy EWHMwas tabulated in the wide range of r, 0.840380< r<30.0. In Figure 1, we show the corresponding values of Vby dots and use the spline interpolation to determine the value of the potential between them (solid lin e). At larger rthe potential can be evaluated by its polarization tail, 8V(r) =−2.25 r4, (41) while at the lower rone can put EWHM= 0 in Eq. (40) and get V(r) =−1 r+ 0.5. (42) As Figure 1 demonstrates, these extrapolations match very g ood the data from [18]. With the well-defined potential V(r) we can find the value of the coefficient in the estimate of the binding energy for the state s= 0. Numerical integration of the potential in Eq. (38), with the natural replacement 2 πr⊥dr⊥dz→4πr2dr, yields −ε0= 6.31B2. (43) To verify the estimates (39) and (43) we have also solved nume rically the Schr¨ odinger equation (28), calculating the effective potentials Vs(z) numerically from the potential V(r) presented in Figure 1. First of all, we were searching for the states with no nodes of the lo ngitudinal wave function of the external electron (ν= 0−states). The results for the corresponding binding energie s, for different numbers of s and field strengths, are shown in Figure 2 by open circles. Sol id lines represent the estimates (39) and (43), and we can conclude that they are in fairly good agreeme nt with the numerical results. We have also performed the search for the bound states with higher longit udinal excitations, ν= 1,2,..., but found no one, for the magnetic field strengths 10−6<B < 10−4. This indicates that the effective potential Vs(z) is so weak that for each sit can bind the external electron only in the ν= 0−state. Finally, to control the validity of the quasimolecular appr oach, we have calculated the quantity h(r) = h00(r), the non-adiabatic correction to the potential V(r), determined by Eq. (10). For this purpose, the wave functions of the electron moving in the field of two fixed c harges were computed via a numerical two-dimensional grid method which was invented by M.V. Ivan ov (for details of the method as well as the description of the corresponding code ATMOLMESH we refe r the reader to [19]). The corresponding results are shown in Figure 1 by open circles. To confirm that t he numerical results reproduce correctly the scaling behaviour of hwithr, we also give the perturbation estimate, h(r) =8 r6, (44) whose derivation is outlined in the Appendix. With increasi ng distances exceeding the size of the neutral hydrogen atom, the non-adiabatic correction becomes small er and smaller compared to |V(r)|. One should notice that at small rthe non-adiabatic correction exceeds the value of |V(r)|. This implies that the non-adiabatic coupling effects are quite significant for the states= 0. However, since the corresponding binding energy obtained neglecting these effects is very sma ll, we believe that a more accurate approach would only change the numerical coefficient in Eq. (43) but not the scaling low, −ε0∝B2. The approach developed in this paper can also be directly app lied to the analysis of highly excited exotic anions, for example to the ion formed by attaching the muon to the hydrogen atom. Due to the fact that the shell of the H µ−−ion is formed by two different particles (the electron and muo n) there is no need for antisimmetrization (exchange) and the ansatz (7 ) for the wave function of the ion becomes exact. Moreover, since the muon is much heavier than the elec tron (the muon-to-electron mass ratio is mµ/me≈207), the binding energies for the muonic ion are larger. Rep lacement of the electron mass by the muon mass in Eq. (31) leads to the following estimates 9−ε0= 1306B2, s= 0, −εs= 508B3δ2 s, s= 1,2,... . (45) In Figure 2, the corresponding energies are plotted as dashe d lines. Evidently, the non-adiabatic correction to the one-particle potential for the H µ−ion ismµ/metimes smaller than that for the ion H−(see Figure 1), which makes the estimate for s= 0 more reliable in the case of the H µ−ion. IV. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK In this paper, we have studied the states of the negative atom ic ions which are induced by the presence of a magnetic field. Apart from the neglect of the exchange int eraction between the external and atomic (core) electrons the equations we start with are exact. Perf orming an analysis of the weakly bound states of the external electron, it is possible to reduce the proble m to an effective one-particle by neglecting the non-adiabatic coupling terms. In the presence of the mag netic field which determines the transverse motion of the external electron further simplifications are possible which reduce the question of the binding mechanism to a one-dimensional Schr¨ odinger equat ion for the motion of the external electron along the field. We can conclude that in the approximation of the infinitely he avy nucleus the number of the ionic bound states is infinite, in accordance with the general theorem of [1]. A quite simple and appealing physical picture of the appearance of such states is that the external electron can be attached to the atom with different values of its angular momentum along the magnetic fi eld. The number of such possible definite values is infinite and for each value a different 1D effective po tential appears. This potential determines the motion of the external electron along the field and can bin d the electron in at least one quantum state. We have labelled these states by the integer number s= 0,1,2,...(negative of the magnetic quantum number of the external electron), and obtained general esti mates of the binding energies of negatively charged ions. These estimates establish both the dependenc e of the binding energies on the magnetic field strength and on the quantum number s: fors= 0 the binding energy scales with BasB2and for s= 1,2,...the scaling low is −εs∝B3; at largesthe binding energies behave as −εs∝s−3. To apply the estimates for s >0 to a specific ion one needs only to know the polarizability of the corresponding neutral atom in an external electric field, while the estimat e fors= 0 involves the whole atomic potential acting on a static external electron. We have applied the estimates obtained to the H−−ion, exploiting the known polarizability of the hydrogen atom and the potential for the static two-charge Co ulomb problem [18]. We also have verified that these estimates are in complete agreement with results of the numerical integration of the Schr¨ odinger equation for the motion of the external electron along the ma gnetic field. The binding energies for the H−−ion that we have obtained are indeed very small compared to th e binding energy of the hydrogen atom. At the largest magnetic fields available at laboratories now, B∼30 T, the binding energy for the H−−ion is approximately 2 .8×10−3meV for the state with the zero angular momentum of the external electron, and it is ≈1.4×10−7meV for the state with s= 1. The magnetically induced bound states of the exotic muon ion s possess a much larger binding energy. For the same value of the magnetic field strength, the muon affin ity to the hydrogen atom is 0 .58 meV for the state s= 0 and 2.9×10−5meV for the state s= 1. It also looks quite challenging to detect the excited anion s tates for heavier atoms which have polar- izabilities significantly larger than the hydrogen atom. Fo r example, the polarizability of Cs is, with 2% 10accuracy,κ= 403 [17]. The resulting electron affinity to this atom for the states= 1 atB= 30 T is ≈2×10−4meV. Another challenging example is the anion of Ba, which do es not exist at B= 0. The polarizability of Ba, with 8% accuracy, is κ= 268 [17], and the binding energy of its excited anion, for the external electron state with s= 1 atB= 30 T is ≈1.8×10−5meV. The corresponding states of the exotic ions, Cs µ−and Baµ−, possess the binding energies of ≈4×10−2meV and ≈4×10−3meV, respectively. Although we cannot directly apply the estimate (38) for the b inding energy of the external electron with zero angular momentum to heavier ions, in order to have a n idea about their order of magnitude we can speculate that these binding energies differ from the res ult (43) by the factor of ( κ/4.5)2, whereκis the polarizability of an atom and 4 .5 is the numerical value of the polarizability of the hydroge n atom. In this way we can evaluate the binding energy for the state s= 0 of the external electron of the ion of Cs−, atB= 30 T, as −ε0∼20 meV. For the same state of the ion of Ba−we obtain, at the same field strength, −ε0∼10 meV. As we see, the magnetically induced anion bound state s for atoms with large polarizabilities can very well be detectable in laboratori es. Because of the large extension of the wave function of the loo sely bound electron our results may also apply to molecules and clusters although in a less quantitat ive manner. As molecules and clusters can exhibit large polarizabilities [17] we expect that magneti cally induced bound states exist for them and possess considerable binding energies. One important issue which was not addressed in this paper are the finite nucleus mass effects which can affect the ion states significantly. The underlying physi cal picture of the finite nuclear motion for charged systems was discussed in detail in, e.g., [20]. Here we only mention that the electron states are affected by an oscillating electric field introduced in the in ternal (electronic) system of the ion due to the rotation of the ion as a whole over a Landau-like orbit. For a c rude estimate, we may assume that due to the ion motion the ion’s states get the oscillator-like ener gy excess ¯hΩN, where Ω = eB/(Mc),Mis the ion mass and N= 0,1,2,.... Since in the presence of the magnetic field the internal (ele ctronic) degrees of freedom are inherently coupled to the center of mass ones [ 20], we can expect that similar to the case of the positive He+−ion [21] the minimal possible value of Nfor stable states coincides with s. In this case, ans−state of the external electron is still bound if −εs>¯hΩs, or B 1 T>1.58×104 A1/2κs1/2 δs, (46) whereAis the mass number of the ion. According to this criterion, fo r the H−−ion the magnetic field strength which stabilizes the state s= 1 against the motional Stark effect, is large, B≈3.5×103T, and cannot be achieved in laboratories. However, for heavie r ions, the magnetic field which can stabilize them in excited states are smaller. For example, for the Cs−−ion, such a field is ≈3.4s1/2δ−1 sT, so the external electron can be bound in a few s−states at the magnetic fields available at laboratories. We m ust remark that these estimates of the center of mass effects on th e ion bound states are very preliminary and based on the intuitive picture of the inclusion of the osc illator-like energies associated with the ion motion across the magnetic field in the total energy spectrum . We plan to perform the corresponding analysis accurately in order to see how the nuclear motion in fluences the induced bound states in the magnetic field. But already now we can speculate that the finit e nuclear mass effects make at least the highly excited s−states unbound which means that in reality the actual number of bound ion states is finite and not infinite. 11Acknowledgements We are grateful to M.V. Ivanov for providing us with numerica lly computed wave functions for the ground state of an electron moving in the Coulomb fields of two static charges. One of the authors (VGB) is pleased to acknowledge the Alexander-von-Humbold t Stiftung for the Fellowship. Support by the Deutsche Forchungemeinschaft is greatly acknowledged . Appendix According to Eq. (10), the non-adiabatic correction to the p otential of interaction between the hydrogen atom and an extra electron reads h00(r) =¯h2 2me/integraldisplay dr1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle∂ ∂rφ0(r1,r)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 . (A1) Here integration is performed over the position r1of the core electron and the wave function φ0describes the ground state of the atom perturbed by the interaction wit h the static external electron. When the interaction is weak, this wave function can be evaluated by t he first order perturbation theory, φ0(r1,r) =φ(0) 0(r1) +/summationdisplay f/negationslash=0Wf0(r) E(0) 0−E(0) fφ(0) f(r1), (A2) whereφ(0) 0andφ(0) fare the wave functions of the ground and excited states of the non-perturbed atom, respectively, E(0) 0andE(0) fare the corresponding eigenenergies and Wf0(r) =∝angbracketleftφ(0) f|W(r1,r)|φ(0) 0∝angbracketright (A3) are the matrix elements of the perturbation operator W(r1,r) =e2 |r1−r|−e2 r. (A4) Substituting (A2) into (A1) and integrating over r1yields, due to the orthogonality of the hydrogenic wave functions, h00=¯h2 2me/summationdisplay f/negationslash=0|Sf0|2 /parenleftBig E(0) 0−E(0) f/parenrightBig2, (A5) whereS=∂W/∂ r. To simplify the latter expression, let us approximate the e nergy difference in the denominator by the quantity −Ry. Then, using the completeness property of the hydrogenic wave functions, we obtain h00=¯h2 2meRy2/bracketleftBig/parenleftbig S2/parenrightbig 00−(S00)2/bracketrightBig , (A6) where/parenleftbig S2/parenrightbig 00andS00are the mean values of the operators S2andS, respectively, for the ground state of the non-perturbed hydrogen atom. To calculate them, it is mo st convenient to specify the internal atomic coordinates with the quantization axis along r. In these coordinates, assuming r≫r1, we can replace the operator (A4) by the first, dipole, term of its multipole e xpansion (cf. Eq (15)), W= (e2/r2)z1. Then we have S=−(2e2/r3)z1. For the latter operator, because of the z−parity of the hydrogenic state, one hasS00= 0 and Eq. (A6) reduces to 12h00=2¯h2e4/parenleftbig z2 1/parenrightbig 00 meRy2r6. (A7) Substituting there the known value/parenleftbig z2 1/parenrightbig 00=a2 0and introducing atomic units, we obtain the estimate of the non-adiabatic correction given by Eq. (44), h00(r) = 8/r6. [1] J.E. Avron, I.W. Herbst and B. Simon, Commun. Math. Phys. 79 (1981) 529. [2] M.K. Scheller, R.N. Compton and L.S. Cederbaum, Science 270 (1995) 1160. [3] R.N. Hill, Phys. Rev. Lett 38 (1977) 643. [4] B.M. Smirnov, Negative Ions , McGraw-Hill Inc. 1982. [5] T. Andersen, H.K. Haugen and H. Hotop, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data (1999) (submitted). [6] R.J.W. Henry, R.F. O’Connell, E.R. Smith, G. Chanmugam a nd A.K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 329. [7] G.L. Surmelian, R.J.W. Henry, and R.F. O’Connell, Phys. Lett. 49a (1974) 431. [8] D.M. Larsen, Phys. Rev. B 20 (1979) 5217; Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 742; Phys. Rev. B 23 (1981) 4076. [9] C.-H. Park and A.F. Starace, Phys. Rev. A 29 (1984) 442. [10] M. Vincke and D. Baye, J. Phys. B 22 (19b9) 2089. [11] D.M. Larsen and S.Y. McCann, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 3966; 47 (1993) 13175. [12] M. Bylicki, S. Themelis and C.A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 27 (1994) 2741. [13] H. Massey, Negative Ions , Cambridge University Press 1976. [14] H. Ruder, G. Wunner, H. Herold and F. Geyer, Atoms in Strong Magnetic Fields , Springer-Verlag 1994. [15] B. Simon, Ann. Phys. (NY) 97 (1976) 279. [16] K.D. Bonin and V.V. Kresin, Electric-Dipole Polarizabilities of Atoms, Molecules and Clusters , World Sci- entific Publishing 1997. [17] T.M. Miller, Atomic and Molecular Polarizabilities , inCRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 76th Edi- tion, CRC Press 1996 [18] R.F. Walles, R. Herman and H.W. Milnes, J. Mol. Spectroscopy 4 (1960) 51. [19] M.V. Ivanov, J. Phys. B 31 (1998) 2833. [20] P. Schmelcher and L.S. Cederbaum, Phys. Rev. A 43 (1991) 287. [21] V.G. Bezchastnov, G.G. Pavlov and J. Ventura, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 180. 13Figure Captions Figure 1. The one-particle potential of interaction between the stat ic charge −eand the hydrogen atom (solid line) and the non-adiabatic correction to this p otential for the cases when the charge is associated with the electron (long-dashed line) and with th e muon (shot-dashed line). Dots show the reference data for the potential obtained from [18]. The par t of the solid line connecting the dots is obtained by the spline interpolation, at lower rthe solid line corresponds to Eq. (42) while at large r it corresponds to Eq. (41). Open circles show the non-adiaba tic corrections obtained numerically, and dashed lines correspond to the perturbation estimates. Figure 2. Binding energies for the states s= 0,1,2,3,4 (in meV) as functions of the magnetic field strength (in Tesla). The conversion rate used is: 1 a.u. = 2 .35×105T. Solid lines show the estimates for the ion H−given by Eqs. (43) and (39), and dots represent the results of our numerical treatment. Dashed lines show the corresponding energies for the muonic ion, Hµ−. 14/D6 /B4/CP/BA/D9/BA/B5/A0 /CE /B4 /D6 /B5/B8 /CW /B4 /D6 /B5 /B4/CP/BA/D9/BA/B5/BD/BC /BD /BC/BA/BD /BD/BC/BD/BD/BC /A0 /BD/BD/BC /A0 /BE/BD/BC /A0 /BF/BD/BC /A0 /BG/BD/BC /A0 /BH/BD/BC /A0 /BI/D7/BP/BG/D7/BP/BF/D7/BP/BE/D7/BP/BD/D7/BP/BC/BU /B4/CC/B5/BU/CX/D2/CS/CX/D2/CV /CT/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /B4/D1/CT/CE/B5/BD/BC /BD /BC/BA/BD /BD/BD/BC /A0 /BE/BD/BC /A0 /BG/BD/BC /A0 /BI/BD/BC /A0 /BK/BD/BC /A0 /BD/BC/BD/BC /A0 /BD/BE/BD/BC /A0 /BD/BG/BD/BC /A0 /BD/BI