Datasets:

anonymousdatasets
/

arxiv-physics

Dataset card Viewer Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 15.8k rows

text stringlengths 8 1.32M ⌀
arXiv:physics/0006017v1 [physics.atom-ph] 7 Jun 2000FINITE-DIFFERENCE CALCULATIONS FOR ATOMS AND DIATOMIC MOLECULES IN STRONG MAGNETIC AND STATIC ELECTRIC FIELDS Mikhail V. Ivanov†and Peter Schmelcher Theoretische Chemie, Physikalisch–Chemisches Institut, Universit¨ at Heidelberg, INF 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany e-mail: Mikhail.Ivanov@tc.pci.uni-heidelberg.de †Permanent address: Institute of Precambrian Geology and Ge ochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nab. Makarova 2, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia e-mail: MIvanov@MI1596.spb.edu Abstract. Fully numerical mesh solutions of 2D quantum equations of Sc hr¨ odinger and Hartree-Fock type allow us to work with wavefunctions wh ich possess a very ﬂex- ible geometry. This ﬂexibility is especially important for calculations of atoms and molecules in strong external ﬁelds where neither the extern al ﬁeld nor the internal interactions can be considered as a perturbation. The appli cations of the present ap- proach include calculations of atoms and diatomic molecule s in strong static electric and magnetic ﬁelds. For the latter we have carried out Hartre e-Fock calculations for He, Li, C and several other atoms. This yields in particular t he ﬁrst comprehensive in- vestigation of the ground state conﬁgurations of the Li and C atoms in the whole range of magnetic ﬁelds (0 < B < 10000 a.u.) and a study of the ground state electronic conﬁgurations of all the atoms with 1 < Z≤10 and their ions A+in the high-ﬁeld fully spin-polarised regime. The results in a case of a stron g electric ﬁeld relate to single-electron systems including the correct solution of the Schr¨ odinger equation for the H+ 2ion (energies and decay rates) and the hydrogen atom in stron g parallel electric and magnetic ﬁelds. I INTRODUCTION Theoretical studies of atoms and molecules in strong extern al ﬁelds are motivated by several applications. The latter are e.g. experiments wi th intense laser beams (electromagnetic ﬁelds with dominating electric componen t) and astronomical ob- servations of white dwarfs and neutron stars (magnetic ﬁeld s). The experimentalavailability of extremely strong electric ﬁelds in laser be ams makes the theoretical study of various atomic and molecular species under such con ditions very desirable. The properties of atomic and molecular systems in strong ﬁel ds undergo dramatic changes in comparison with the ﬁeld-free case. These change s are associated with the strong distortions of the spatial distributions of the e lectronic density and cor- respondingly the geometry of the electronic wavefunctions . This complex geometry is diﬃcult for its description by means of traditional sets o f basis functions and requires more ﬂexible approaches which can, in particular, be provided by multi- dimensional mesh ﬁnite-diﬀerence methods. Let us discuss the problem of atoms in a strong magnetic ﬁeld i n more detail. We start this consideration with the hydrogen atom which was th e ﬁrst atom whose behaviour in strong magnetic ﬁelds was investigated (for a l ist of references see [1–4]). In cylindrical coordinates ( ρ,z) its non-relativistic Hamiltonian has the form (we use atomic units throughout our work) H=−1 2/parenleftBigg∂2 ∂ρ2+1 ρ∂ ∂ρ+∂2 ∂z2−m2 ρ2/parenrightBigg +szγ+m 2γ+γ2 8ρ2−1 r(1) wheremis the magnetic quantum number, szis the spin zprojection and γ=B/B 0,B0= ¯hc/ea2 0= 2.3505·105T is the magnetic ﬁeld strength in atomic units. The magnetic ﬁeld is parallel to the zaxis. The Hamiltonian (1) contains two potentials of diﬀerent spatial symmetries: the spheric al-symmetric Coulomb term 1/rand the cylindrically symmetric potential of the magnetic ﬁ eldγ2ρ2/8. When considering the impact of the competing Coulomb and dia magnetic interac- tion it is reasonable to distinguish the three diﬀerent regi mes of weak, strong and intermediate ﬁelds. In the latter case the magnetic and Coul omb forces are compa- rable. In the case of relatively weak ﬁelds the main features of the geometry of the wavefunction are determined by the dominating Coulomb term whereas the eﬀect of the magnetic ﬁeld can be consider as a perturbation of the Cou lomb wavefunctions. For the opposite situation of very strong magnetic ﬁelds and dominating cylindrical symmetry the adiabatic approximation [5–7] was the main the oretical tool during the last four decades. This approximation separately consi ders the fast motion of the electron across the ﬁeld and its slow motion in a modiﬁed C oulomb potential along the ﬁeld direction. Both early (see [8]) and more recen t works [2,9–12] on the hydrogen atom have used diﬀerent approaches for these regim es of the magnetic ﬁeld. All these calculations had problems when considering the hydrogen atom in ﬁelds of intermediate strength. The detailed calculations of the hydrogen energy levels carried out by R¨ osner et al [2] also retained the separation into diﬀerent regimes of the ﬁeld strength by decomposing the electronic w ave function either in terms of spherical (weak to intermediate ﬁelds) or cylindri cal (intermediate to high ﬁelds) orbitals. A solution allowing to obtain comprehensi ve results on low-lying energy levels of the hydrogen atom for arbitrary ﬁeld streng ths including the in- termediate ﬁeld regime is provided by the multi-dimensiona l mesh solution of the Schr¨ odinger equation [3].For diﬀerent electronic degrees of excitation of the atom th e intermediate regime is met for diﬀerent absolute values of the ﬁeld strength. For the ground state this regime is roughly given by γ= 0.2−20. For atoms with several electrons there are two decisive factors which enrich the possible changes in th e electronic structure with varying ﬁeld strength compared to the one-electron sys tem. First, we have a third competing interaction which is the electron-electro n repulsion and, second, the diﬀerent electrons feel very diﬀerent Coulomb forces, i .e. possess diﬀerent one particle energies, and consequently the regime of the inter mediate ﬁeld strengths appears to be the sum of the intermediate regimes for the sepa rate electrons. The fact that most methods have problems in the intermediate ﬁeld region has consequences for the current state of the art of our knowledg e on on multi-electron atoms in strong magnetic ﬁelds. There exist a number of such i nvestigations in the literature [6,7,13–22]. The majority of them deals with the adiabatic regime in superstrong ﬁelds and the early works are mostly Hartree- Fock (HF) type cal- culations. There are also several early variational calcul ations for the low-ﬁeld domain [15,23,24]. HF calculations for arbitrary ﬁeld stre ngths have been carried out in refs. [2,19] by applying two diﬀerent sets of basis fun ctions in the high- and low-ﬁeld regimes. As a result of the complicated geometry th is approach suﬀers in the intermediate regime from very slow convergence and low a ccuracy of the cal- culated energy eigenvalues. Accurate HF calculations for a rbitrary ﬁeld strengths were carried out in refs. [18,20] by the 2D mesh HF method. Inv estigations on the ground state as well as a number of excited states of helium in cluding the corre- lation energy have recently been performed via a Quantum Mon te Carlo approach [22]. Very recently benchmark results with a precision of 10−4−10−6for the en- ergy levels have been obtained for a large number of excited s tates with diﬀerent symmetries using a conﬁguration interaction approach with an anisotropic Gaus- sian basis set [25,26]. Focusing on systems with more than tw o electrons however the number of investigations is very scarce [6,21,27]. In vi ew of the above there is a need for further quantum mechanical investigations and fo r data on atoms with more than two electrons in a strong magnetic ﬁeld. For the car bon atom there exist two investigations [6,7] in the adiabatic approximation wh ich give a few values for the binding energies in the high ﬁeld regime and one more rele vant recent work by Jones et al[21]. On the other hand, our two-dimensional Hartree-Fock a pproach allowed us recently to perform precise and reliable conside ration of a series of multi- electron atoms for the whole range of the magnetic ﬁeld stren gths fromγ= 0 up to ultrastrong ﬁelds γ= 103−104[18,20,28–31]. II TWO-DIMENSIONAL MESH HARTREE-FOCK METHOD Our calculations for multi-electron atoms in magnetic ﬁeld s are carried out under the assumption of an inﬁnitely heavy nucleus in the (unrestr icted) Hartree-Fock approximation. The solution is established in the cylindri cal coordinate system(ρ,φ,z ) with the z-axis oriented along the magnetic ﬁeld. We prescribe to each electron a deﬁnite value of the magnetic quantum number mµ. Each single-electron wave function Ψ µdepends on the variables φand (ρ,z) Ψµ(ρ,φ,z ) = (2π)−1/2e−imµφψµ(z,ρ) (2) whereµdenotes the numbering of the electrons. The resulting parti al diﬀerential equations for ψµ(z,ρ) have been presented in ref. [20]. The one-particle equations for the wave functions ψµ(z,ρ) are solved by means of the fully numerical mesh method described in refs. [3,18,20 ]. In our ﬁrst works on the helium atom in magnetic ﬁelds [18,20] we calculated the C oulomb and exchange integrals by means of a direct summation over the mesh nodes. But this direct method is very expensive with respect to the computer time an d due to this reason we obtained in the following works [28–31] these potentials as solutions of the corresponding Poisson equation. The problem of the boundar y conditions for the Poisson equation as well as the problem of simultaneously so lving Poisson equation on the same meshes with Schr¨ odinger-like equations for the wave functions ψµ(z,ρ) have been discussed in ref. [20]. The simultaneous solution of the Poisson equations for the C oulomb and ex- change potentials and Schr¨ odinger-like equations for the wave functions ψµ(z,ρ) is a complicated computational problem, especially for ato ms in strong magnetic ﬁelds. The problem consists in the diﬀerent geometry of the s patial distribution of the electron density and the potentials correspondent to this density. In strong magnetic ﬁelds the distributions of the electronic densiti es are compressed towards thezaxis and look like needles directed along the zaxis. The equations for the wavefunctions can be solved in ﬁnite cylindrical domains as done in refs. [3,18,20]. For strong magnetic ﬁelds γ >> 1 these domains can be rather small in the ρ direction. On the other hand, the potentials created by thes e charge distributions cannot have such a strongly anisotropic form and the Poisson equations for them must be solved on meshes with the distribution of nodes not ve ry diﬀerent for the zandρdirections. This means some loss of the precision for the wav efunctions due to a decrease of the number of nodes in the area of a large el ectronic density. The most diﬃcult problem, however, is the diﬀerent asymptot ic behaviour of the wavefunctions and potentials. The wavefunctions of the bou nd electrons decrease exponentially as r→ ∞ (ris the distance from the origin). This simpliﬁes the problem of the solution of the corresponding equations in th e inﬁnite space be- cause it is possible either to solve these equations in a ﬁnit e domain Ω (with simple boundary conditions ψ\|∂Ω= 0 or∂ψ/∂n \|∂Ω= 0) with negligible errors for domains of reasonable dimensions or otherwise to solve these equati ons in the inﬁnite space on meshes with exponentially growing distances between nod es asr→ ∞. The solutions of the Poisson equations for non-zero sums of char ges decrease as 1 /ras r→ ∞. In result, every spatial restriction of the domain Ω introd uces a signif- icant error into the ﬁnal solution. In some other mesh Hartre e-Fock approaches developed for diatomic molecules (e.g. see [32,33]) this pr oblem has been solvedfor ﬁnite Ω by introducing special boundary conditions for t he potentials obtained from the asymptotic behaviour of the potentials. This appro ach, being in princi- ple approximate, requires additional calculations with di ﬀerent extensions of Ω to estimate the error. In the present approach we address the above problems by usin g special forms of non-uniform meshes [28]. Solutions to the Poisson equati on on separate meshes contain some errors δPassociated with an inaccurate description of the potential far from the nucleus. However due to the special form of the fu nctionδP(h) for these meshes (where his a formal mesh step) the errors do not show up in the ﬁnal results for the energy and other physical quantities, which we obtain by means of the Richardson extrapolation procedure (polynomial extra polation to h= 0 [3,41]). The main requirement for these meshes is not an exponential, but a polynomial increase of the mesh step hwhenr→ ∞. Moreover, this behaviour can be only linear one, i.e. h−1=O(1/r) asr→ ∞. The error of the mesh solution in this case has the form of a polynomial of the formal step of the mesh ˜h= 1/N, whereNis the number of nodes along one of the coordinates. In practica l calculations these meshes are introduced by means of an orthogonal coordinate t ransformation from the physical coordinates xpto the mathematical ones xmmade separately for ρ andz. And the numerical solution is, in fact, carried out on unifo rm meshes in the mathematical coordinates xm. The characteristic feature of these meshes consists of rapidly increasing coordinates of several outermost nodes when increasing the total number of nodes and decreasing the actual mesh step in the vic inity of the origin. Due to this property we call these meshes “Run away” meshes. T o be concrete we present here two such meshes: 1. The “Plain Poisson” mesh is generated by the coordinate tr ansformation xp=Axm 1−x2 m(3) −∞<xp<+∞,−1<xm<+1,Ais a constant. This simplest mesh of this group is near to the uniform ones near the origin (i.e. a plot of the d istance between the neighbouring nodes contains a large horizontal section clo se toxp= 0) and then this mesh smoothly transforms to the “run away” behaviour fo rxp→ ∞. 2. The “Atomic Poisson” mesh xp=A(\|xm\|+b)xm 1−x2m(4) (b >0) allows obtaining more precise results for atoms at reason able values of b<1 due to a more dense distribution of nodes near the origin. In fact, this formula provides three diﬀerent types of behaviour in three diﬀeren t domains: (a) A uniform mesh in a small vicinity of xp= 0. This behaviour provides absence of irregularities in the ﬁnite-diﬀerence representation of the Hamiltonian. (b)\|xp\| ≈A\|x2 m\|- the quadratic expansion of the mesh. (c) h−1=O(1/r) asr→ ∞. The distribution of nodes for not too big distances from the origin (b) given by th e simple formula (4)is similar to well known “Lagrange meshes” for atoms and prov ide similar precision of results. (See e.g. [34] for a deﬁnition of the “Laguerre me sh” (a mesh with nodes at zeros of the Laguerre polynomials) as a “Lagrange mesh” su itable for systems with the Coulomb potential and [35] (22.16.8) for approxima te formulas for the zeros of the Laguerre polynomials). The overall precision of our results depends, of course, on t he number of mesh nodes and, if necessary, can be improved in calculations wit h denser meshes. The most dense meshes which we could use in the present calculati ons had 120 ×120 nodes. In most cases Richardson’s sequences of meshes with m aximal number 80×80 or 60 ×60 were suﬃcient. III THE STRUCTURE OF THE ATOMIC GROUND STATE CONFIGURATIONS FOR THE LIMIT γ→ ∞ In this section we provide some qualitative considerations on the problem of the ground states of multi-electron atoms in the high ﬁeld limit . These considerations along with the well known electronic structure of the ground states atγ= 0 present a starting point for the combined qualitative and nu merical considerations given in the following section. At very high ﬁeld strengths t he nuclear attraction energies and HF potentials (which determine the motion alon g thezaxis) are small compared to the interaction energies with the magnetic ﬁeld (which determines the motion perpendicular to the magnetic ﬁeld and is responsibl e for the Landau zone structure of the spectrum). Thus in the limit ( γ→ ∞), all the one-electron wave functions of the ground state belong to the lowest Landau zon es, i.e.mµ≤0 for all the electrons, and the system must be fully spin-polarised, i.e.szµ=−1 2. For the Coulomb central ﬁeld the one electron levels form quasi 1D Co ulomb series with the binding energy EB=1 2n2zfornz>0, whereas EB(γ→ ∞)→ ∞ fornz= 0, where nzis the number of nodal surfaces of the wave function crossing thezaxis. In the limitγ→ ∞ the ground state wave function must be formed of the tightly b ound single-electron functions with nz= 0. The one-particle binding energies of these functions decrease as \|m\|increases and, thus, the electrons must occupy orbitals with increasing \|m\|starting with m= 0. In the language of the Hartree-Fock approximation the groun d state wave func- tion of an atom in the high-ﬁeld limit is a fully spin-polaris ed set of single-electron orbitals with no nodal surfaces crossing the zaxis and with non-positive magnetic quantum numbers decreasing from m= 0 tom=−N+ 1, where Nis the number of electrons. In result, we have for the ﬁrst 10 atoms and posi tive ions in the limit γ→ ∞ the following structure of ground state conﬁgurations whic h is a simplesubstitute of the periodic law at very strong magnetic ﬁelds H He+1s M= 0Sz=−1/2 He Li+1s2p−1 M=−1Sz=−1 Li Be+1s2p−13d−2 M=−3Sz=−3/2 Be B+1s2p−13d−24f−3 M=−6Sz=−2 B C+1s2p−13d−24f−35g−4 M=−10Sz=−5/2 C N+1s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−5 M=−15Sz=−3 N O+1s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−57i−6 M=−21Sz=−7/2 O F+1s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−57i−68j−7 M=−28Sz=−4 F Ne+1s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−57i−68j−79k−8M=−36Sz=−9/2 Ne Na+1s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−57i−68j−79k−810l−9M=−45Sz=−5 We shall often refer in the following to these ground state co nﬁgurations in the high-ﬁeld limit as \|0N/angbracketright. The states \|0N/angbracketrightpossess the complete spin polarisation Sz=−N/2. Decreasing the magnetic ﬁeld strength, we can encounter a series of crossovers of the ground state conﬁguration associated wit h transitions of one or several electrons from orbitals with the maximal values for \|m\|to other orbitals with a diﬀerent spatial geometry of the wave function but the same spin polar- isation. This means the ﬁrst few crossovers can take place wi thin the space of fully spin polarised conﬁgurations. We shall refer to these conﬁgurations by noting only the diﬀerence with respect to the state \|0N/angbracketright. This notation can, of course, also be extended to non-fully spin polarised conﬁgurations . For instance the state 1s22p−13d−24f−35g−4withSz=−2 of the carbon atom can be brieﬂy referred to as \|1s2/angbracketright, since the default is the occupation of the hydrogenic serie s 1s,2p−1,3d−2,... and only deviations from it are recorded by this notation. IV GROUND STATE ELECTRONIC CONFIGURATIONS OF ATOMS AND POSITIVE IONS AT ARBITRARY FIELD STRENGTHS Currently the carbon atom is the most complicated system wit h a thoroughly investigated structure of its electronic conﬁgurations fo r arbitrary magnetic ﬁelds and we start this section with a consideration of this atom. In the case of decreasing the magnetic ﬁeld strength from ver y large values to γ= 0 the fully spin-polarised ground state conﬁguration of a m ulti-electron atom must undergo one or several crossovers to become ﬁnally the z ero-ﬁeld ground state conﬁguration. This conﬁguration for the carbon atom c orresponds to the spectroscopic term3P. In the framework of the non-relativistic consideration th is term consists of nine states degenerate due to three possibl ez-projections of the total spinSz=−1,0,1 and three possible values of the total magnetic quantum numberM=−1,0,1. For very weak magnetic ﬁelds it is reasonable to expect valuesSz=−1 andM=−1 for the ground state which can be described in ournotation as 1 s22s22p02p−1. Thus the possible ground state conﬁgurations of the carbon a tom can be divided into three groups according to their total spin projection Sz: theSz=−1 group (low-ﬁeld ground state conﬁgurations), the intermediate g roupSz=−2 and the Sz=−3 group (the high-ﬁeld ground state conﬁgurations). This gr ouping is required for the qualitative part of the following consider ations which are based on the geometry of the spatial parts of the one electron wave fun ctions. We start our consideration for γ/negationslash= 0 with the high-ﬁeld ground state and sub- sequently consider other possible candidates in question f or the electronic ground state forSz=−3 (see Figure 1) with decreasing ﬁeld strength . All the one electron wave functions of the high-ﬁeld ground state 1 s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−5possess no nodal surfaces crossing the z-axis and occupy the energetically lowest orbitals with magnetic quantum numbers ranging from m= 0 down to m=−5. We shall refer to the number of the nodal surfaces crossing the zaxis asnz. The 6h−5orbital pos- sesses the smallest binding energy of all orbitals constitu ting the high-ﬁeld ground state. Its binding energy decreases rapidly with decreasin g ﬁeld strength. Thus, we can expect that the ﬁrst crossover of ground state conﬁgur ations happens due to a change of the 6 h−5orbital into one possessing a higher binding energy at the corresponding lowered range of ﬁeld strength. It is natural to suppose that the ﬁrst transition while decreasing the magnetic ﬁeld strengt h will involve a transition from an orbital possessing nz= 0 to one for nz= 1. The energetically lowest available one particle state with nz= 1 is the 2 p0orbital. Another possible orbital 5 10 15 20 30γ−60−55−50−45−40−35E 1s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−5, Sz=−3 1s2p02p−13d−24f−35g−4, Sz=−3 1s2s2p−13d−24f−35g−4, Sz=−3 1s2s2p02p−13d−24f−3, Sz=−3 1s2p02p−13d−13d−24f−3, Sz=−3 1s2s2p−13d−13d−24f−3, Sz=−3 1s22p−13d−24f−35g−4, Sz=−2 Jones et al (1996), Sz=−2 Jones et al (1996), Sz=−3 FIGURE 1. The total energies (in atomic units) of the states of the carb on atom as functions of the magnetic ﬁeld strength considered for the extraction of the ground state electronic conﬁgura- tions with Sz=−3. Our results (solid lines) and data taken from ref.21 (brok en lines). Energies and ﬁeld strengths are given in atomic units.into which the 6 h−5wave function could evolve is the 2 sstate. For the hydrogen atom or hydrogen-like ions in a magnetic ﬁeld the 2 p0is stronger bound than the 2sorbital. On the other hand, owing to the electron screening i n multi-electron atoms in ﬁeld-free space the 2 sorbital tends to be more tightly bound than the 2p0orbital. Thus, two states i.e. the 1 s2p02p−13d−24f−35g−4state as well as the 1s2s2p−13d−24f−35g−4conﬁguration are candidates for becoming the ground state in theSz=−3 set when we lower the ﬁeld strength coming from the high ﬁeld situation. Analogous arguments lead to the three following candidates for the ground state in case of the second crossover in the Sz=−3 subset which takes place with decreasing ﬁeld strength: 1 s2s2p02p−13d−24f−3, 1s2p02p−13d−13d−24f−3and 1s2s2p−13d−13d−24f−3. It is evident that the one particle energies for the 3 d−1 and 2p0obeyE3d−1> E 2p0for all values of γsince they possess the same nodal structure with respect to the z-axis and only the 3 d−1possesses an additional node in the plane perpendicular to the z-axis. For this reaso n the conﬁguration 1s2s2p−13d−13d−24f−3can be excluded from our considerations of the ground state. This conclusion is fully conﬁrmed by our calculations. Similar reasoning given in detail in ref. [30] can be repeate d for two other ( Sz= −2 andSz=−1) subsets of states and leads to the results presented in tab le 1 and in Figure 2. Figure 3 allows us to add some more informations to the consid erations of the previous section. This ﬁgure presents spatial distributio ns of the total electronic densities for the ground state conﬁgurations of the carbon a tom. More precisely, it allows us to gain insights into the geometry of the distrib ution of the electron 0.01 0.1 1 10 100γ−2.0−1.9−1.8−1.7−1.6−log10(−E) 1s22s22p02p−1 Sz=−1 1s22s2p02p−12p+1 Sz=−2 1s22s2p02p−13d−2 Sz=−2 1s22p02p−13d−24f−3 Sz=−2 1s22p−13d−24f−35g−4 Sz=−2 1s2p02p−13d−24f−35g−4 Sz=−3 1s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−5 Sz=−3 FIGURE 2. Energies of the ground state conﬁgurations as a function of t he ﬁeld strength. Ver- tical dotted lines divide regions belonging to diﬀerent Har tree-Fock ground state conﬁgurations.TABLE 1. The Hartree-Fock ground state conﬁgurations of the carbon a tom in external magnetic ﬁelds. The conﬁgurations presented in th e table are the ground state conﬁgurations at γmin≤γ≤γmax. no. γmin γmax The ground state conﬁguration M S zE(γmin) 1 0 0.1862 1 s22s22p02p−1 −1−1−37.69096 2 0.1862 0.4903 1 s22s2p02p−12p+1 0−2−37.9334 3 0.4903 4.207 1 s22s2p02p−13d−2 −3−2−38.3359 4 4.207 7.920 1 s22p02p−13d−24f−3 −6−2−41.7369 5 7.920 12.216 1 s22p−13d−24f−35g−4 −10−2−43.6397 6 12.216 18.664 1 s2p02p−13d−24f−35g−4 −10−3−44.9341 7 18.664 ∞ 1s2p−13d−24f−35g−46h−5 −15−3−50.9257 density in space and in particular its dependence on the magn etic quantum number FIGURE 3. Contour plots of the total electronic densities for the grou nd state of the carbon atom. For neighbouring lines the densities are diﬀerent by a factor of e. The coordinates z,ρas well as the corresponding ﬁeld strengths are given in atomic units.TABLE 2. The Hartree-Fock ground state conﬁgurations of the lithium atom in external magnetic ﬁelds. The conﬁgurations, presented in t he table are the ground state conﬁgurations at γmin≤γ≤γmax. no. γmin γmax The ground state conﬁguration M S z E(γmin) 1 0 0.17633 1 s22s 0−1/2−7.43275 2 0.17633 2.1530 1 s22p−1 −1−1/2−7.48162 3 2.1530 ∞ 1s2p−13d−2 −3−3/2−7.64785 and the total spin. Thereby we can understand the correspond ing impact on the total energy of the atom. The ﬁrst picture in this ﬁgure prese nts the distribution of the electron density of the ground state of the carbon atom atγ= 0. The following pictures show the distributions of the electroni c densities at values of the ﬁeld strength which mark the boundaries of the regimes of ﬁel d strengths belonging to the diﬀerent ground state conﬁgurations. For the high-ﬁe ld ground state we present the distribution of the electronic density at the cr ossover ﬁeld strength γ= 18.664 and for three additional values of γup toγ= 1000. For each conﬁguration the eﬀect of the increasing ﬁeld stren gth consists in com- pressing the electronic distribution towards the zaxis. However most of the crossovers of ground state conﬁgurations involve the oppos ite eﬀect which is due to the fact that they are associated with an increase of the tota l magnetic quantum numberM=/summationtext6 µ=1mµ. For the lithium atom the analogous arguments and calculatio ns [29] lead to the scheme presented in table 2. V GROUND STATE ELECTRONIC CONFIGURATIONS IN THE HIGH-FIELD REGIME Let us consider now the series of neutral atoms and positive i ons withZ≤10 in the high ﬁeld domain which we deﬁne here as the one, where th e ground state electronic conﬁgurations are fully spin polarised (Fully S pin Polarised (FSP) regime Sz=−N/2). The FSP regime supplies an additional advantage for calc ulations performed in the Hartree-Fock approach, because our one-de terminant wave func- tions are eigenfunctions of the total spin operator S2. Starting from the high-ﬁeld limit we investigate the electronic structure and properti es of the ground states with decreasing ﬁeld strength until we reach the ﬁrst crosso ver to a partially spin polarised (PSP) conﬁguration with Sz=−N/2 + 1. The approach to this investigation is very similar to that de scribed in the previous section and the picture of the crossovers associated with th e ground states of atoms and positive ions A+is presented in table 3. It should be noted that, for atoms withZ≤6 and ions with Z≤7, the state \|1s2/angbracketrightbecomes the ground state while lowering the spin polarisation from the maximal absolute va lueSz=−N/2 to Sz=−N/2 + 1. For heavier atoms and ions we remark that the state \|1s2/angbracketrightis notthe energetically lowest one in the PSP subset at magnetic ﬁe ld strengths for which its energy becomes equal to the energy of the lowest FSP state . For these atoms and ions the state \|1s22p0/angbracketrightis energetically lower than \|1s2/angbracketrightat these ﬁeld strengths. For atoms with Z≥7 and positive ions with Z≥8 the intersection points between the state \|1s22p0/angbracketrightand the energetically lowest state in the FSP subspace have t o be calculated. In result, the spin-ﬂip crossover occurs at hig her ﬁelds than this would be in the case of \|1s2/angbracketrightbeing the lowest state in the PSP subspace. In particular, th e spin-ﬂip crossover for the neon atom is found to be slightly h igher than the point of the crossover \|2p0/angbracketright−\|2p03d−1/angbracketright, and, therefore, this atom has in the framework of the Hartree-Fock approximation only two fully spin polarised c onﬁgurations likewise other neutral atoms and positive ions with 6 ≤Z≤10. It should be noted that the situation with the neon atom can be regarded as a transien t one due to closeness of the intersection \|2p0/angbracketright−\|2p03d−1/angbracketrightto the intersection \|2p0/angbracketright−\|1s22p0/angbracketright. This means that we can expect the conﬁguration \|2p03d−1/angbracketrightto be the global ground state for the sodium atom ( Z= 11). In addition an investigation of the neon atom carried o ut on a more precise level than the Hartree-Fock method could al so introduce some corrections to the picture described above for this atom. Summarising our results we remark that the atoms and positiv e ions with Z≤5 have one FSP ground state conﬁguration \|0N/angbracketrightwhereas the atoms and ions with 6≤Z≤10 possess two such conﬁgurations \|0N/angbracketrightand\|2p0/angbracketright. Possessing total energies for all the atoms with Z≤10 we can compare these results with the adiabatic calculations [6,7]. Both our res ults (E2D) and calculations [6,7] (E1D) are carried out in the adiabatic approximation. The diﬀere nce between E1DandE2Dconsists only in the usage of the adiabatic approximation fo r obtaining 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Z0.0040.0070.0100.0200.0300.0500.0700.100(E1D−E2D)/\|E2D\|B12=0.1 B12=0.5 B12=1 B12=2.35 (γ=1000) B12=5 FIGURE 4. Relative errors of the total energy in the adiabatic approxi mation depending on the charge of the nucleus. E1D– the total energies in the adiabatic approximation ( B12= 0.1,0.5,1,5 [6],B12= 2.35 [7]), E2D– our two-dimensional mesh results. B12=B/1012G.TABLE 3. Total energies (a.u.) of the neutral atoms and ions A+at the crossover points of the ground state conﬁgurations. Z γ Atomic state(s) −E(Atomic) Ionic state(s) −E(A+) 2 0.711 \|0N/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 2.76940 \|0N/angbracketright 2.32488 3 2.153 \|0N/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 7.64785 \|0N/angbracketright 7.00057 2.0718/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 7.65600 \|0N/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 6.94440 4 4.567 \|0N/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 15.9166 \|0N/angbracketright 15.07309 4.501/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 15.91625 \|0N/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 15.01775 5 8.0251 \|0N/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 28.18667 \|0N/angbracketright 27.16436 7.957/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 28.17996 \|0N/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 27.10004 6 18.664 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 50.9257 \|0N/angbracketright 49.50893 14.536 \|2p0/angbracketright 47.23836 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 45.77150 12.351 \|2p0/angbracketright 45.07386 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 43.72095 12.216 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 44.9341/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 43.70075 7 36.849 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 84.4186 \|0N/angbracketright 82.58182 30.509 \|2p0/angbracketright 79.34493 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 77.41246 17.429 \|2p0/angbracketright 66.72786 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 65.26170 17.398 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 66.69306/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s2/angbracketrightbig 65.25362 8 64.720 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 130.6806 \|0N/angbracketright 128.4054 55.747 \|2p0/angbracketright 124.1125 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 121.69825 23.985 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 94.3773 \|2p0/angbracketright 92.78308 23.849/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 94.3336 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 92.62502 9 104.650 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 191.8770 \|0N/angbracketright 189.1446 92.624 \|2p0/angbracketright 183.6944 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 180.7819 31.735 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 128.1605 \|2p0/angbracketright 126.4414 31.612/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 128.1125 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 126.2897 10 159.138 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 270.220 \|0N/angbracketright 267.0112 143.604 \|2p0/angbracketright 260.2740 \|0N/angbracketright,\|2p0/angbracketright 256.8459 40.672 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 168.4734 \|2p0/angbracketright 166.6327 40.559/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 168.4217 \|2p0/angbracketright,/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1s22p0/angbracketrightbig 166.4863energiesE1Dinstead of exact solution of the Hartree-Fock equations for E2D. Thus, the comparison of E1DandE2Dallows us to evaluate the precision of the adiabatic approximation itself and obtain an idea of the degree of its a pplicability for multi- electron atoms for diﬀerent ﬁeld strengths and nuclear char ges. All our values lie lower than the values of these adiabatic calculations. It is well known, that the precision of the adiabatic approximation decreases with de creasing ﬁeld strength. The increase of the relative errors with decreasing ﬁeld str ength is clearly visible in the table. On the other hand, the relative errors of the adi abatic approximation possess the tendency to increase with growing Z, which is manifested by the scaling transformation E(Z,γ) =Z2E(1,γ/Z2) (e.g. [36,20]) well known for hydrogen-like ions. The behaviour of the inner electrons is to some extent s imilar to the behaviour of the electrons in the corresponding hydrogen-like ions. T herefore their behaviour is to lowest order similar to the behaviour of the electron in the hydrogen atom at magnetic ﬁeld strength γ/Z2i.e. this behaviour can be less accurately described by the adiabatic approximation at large Zvalues. The absolute values of the errors in the total energy associated with the adiabatic approxima tion are in many cases larger than the corresponding values of the ionisation ener gies. VI MESH APPROACH FOR SINGLE-ELECTRON ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR SYSTEMS IN STRONG ELECTRIC FIELDS In this section we present some features of our approach With respect to its application to systems in strong external electric ﬁelds an d correspondingly some relevant physical results. In contrast to the situation dis cussed in the previous sections atoms and molecules in external uniform electric ﬁ elds have no stationary states, because for every state there is a probability that o ne or several electrons leave the system. Thus, when switching on the external unifo rm electric ﬁeld, all the stationary states turn into resonances. Using the compl ex form of the energy eigenvalues E=E0−iΓ/2 one may consider quasi-stationary states of quantum system s similarly to the sta- tionary ones. In this approach the real part of the energy E0is the centre of the band corresponding to the quasi-stationary state and the im aginary part Γ /2 is the half-width of the band which determines the lifetime of the s tate. In this communi- cation we consider systems which can be described by two-dim ensional one-electron Hamiltonians. These systems include the hydrogen atom and t he H+ 2molecular ion in an electric ﬁeld [37–39] and the hydrogen atom in parallel electric and magnetic ﬁelds [39,40]. The only electron present in such a system can leave it under impact of the external electric ﬁeld. From the mathematical point o f view the problem consists in obtaining solutions of the single-particle Sch r¨ odinger equation for thiselectron with the correct asymptotic behaviour of the wavef unction as an outgoing wave. Currently we have three diﬀerent possibilities for ﬁx ing this asymptotics realised in our computational program: 1. Complex boundary condition method. This method is described in detail in ref. [38]. The method is based on the fact that the single-electro n Schr¨ odinger equation for a ﬁnite system can be solved with the arbitrary precision in a ﬁnite area both for stationary and for quasi-stationary eigenstates. The c ase of stationary states is considered in [41,3]. The approach for the quasi-stationar y states will be discussed following [38]. Figure 5 presents the potential curve for th e simplest Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom in an electric ﬁeld H=−1 2/parenleftBigg∂2 ∂ρ2+1 ρ∂ ∂ρ+∂2 ∂z2−m2 ρ2/parenrightBigg −1 r−Fz (5) Fis the electric ﬁeld strength multiplied by the charge of the electron. Analogously to [40,3] the calculations can be carried out in an area Ω whic h is ﬁnite along the directionz. For this coordinate we used uniform meshes. The boundary of the areaz=−Lz−forz <0 (F≥0) (Figure 5) is determined from the condition of small values of the wavefunction on the boundary and, theref ore, small perturba- tions introduced by the corresponding boundary condition [ 3]. The values of the wavefunction on the opposite boundary of the area ( z=Lz+) cannot be excluded from the consideration. We consider non-stationary states of the system decaying into continuum of free particles. In this process an electro n leaves the system in directionz→+∞and, thus, an outgoing wave boundary condition is to be estab - lished onz=Lz+. The form of this boundary condition can be derived from the asymptotic behaviour of the wavefunction for z→+∞and has the form FIGURE 5. The potential energy for the hydrogen atom V(ρ= 0, z) in the external uniform electric ﬁeld.∂ψ ∂z+/parenleftbiggF 2k2−ik/parenrightbigg ψ/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle z=Lz+= 0 (6) wherek= [2(E+Fz)]1/2is the wavenumber. Solving the Schr¨ odinger equation with the Hamiltonian (5) and the boundary condition (6) establis hed on a reasonable distanceLz+from the origin of the system we can obtain the complex eigenv alues of the energy and the wavefunctions of the type presented in t he Figure 6. This straightforward approach enables obtaining precise r esults both for atoms and molecules from weak to moderate strong ﬁelds (for instan ce for the ground state of the hydrogen atom up to F= 0.20−0.25 a.u.). 2. Classical complex rotation of the coordinate zin the form z→zeiΘ.In this approach we have obtained precise results for atomic system s in strong ﬁelds from the lower bound of the over-barrier regime up to superstrong ﬁelds correspond- ing to regime \|ReE\|<<\|ImE\|[39]. On the other hand, this method cannot be immediately applied to molecular systems in our direct mesh approach [42,39]. 3. Exterior complex transformation of the coordinate z.In our numerical ap- proach we transform the real coordinate zinto a curved path in the complex plane z. This transformation leaves intact the Hamiltonian in the i nternal part of the system, but supplies the complex rotation of z(and the possibility to use the zero asymptotic boundary conditions for the wavefunction) in th e external part of the system. The transformation can be applied both for atoms and molecules and pro- vides precise results for ﬁelds from weak up to superstrong w ith some decrease of the numerical precision in the regime \|ReE\|<<\|ImE\|[39]. The numerical results obtained by all three methods coincid e And are in agree- ment with numerous published data on the hydrogen atom in ele ctric ﬁelds (see e.g. [43–46] and references in [38]). Some of our results for the hydrogen atom in parallel electri c and magnetic ﬁelds [39] are shown in Table 4. FIGURE 6. Real and imaginary parts of the wavefunction of the H+ 2molecule in a longitudinal electric ﬁeld F(a.u.).TABLE 4. The ground state of the hydrogen atom in parallel electric an d magnetic ﬁelds atF= 0.1,1,5. F= 0.1 F= 1 F= 5 γ E 0 Γ/2 E0 Γ/2 E0 Γ/2 0 −0.5274183 7 .26904( −3)−0.6243366 0 .6468208 −0.1350071 3 .083929 0.01−0.532390 7 .2624(−3) −0.629329 0 .646812 −0.140005 3 .083925 0.1−0.574600 6 .6392(−3) −0.673584 0 .646053 −0.184739 3 .083589 1 −0.8443098 9 .5923(−5) −1.0421379 0 .577291 −0.6077008 3 .050207 10 −1.7498730 — −1.9579187 0 .1173924 −2.375552 1 .955678 100 −3.790110 — −3.8219215 4 .9988(−5)−4.3806709 0 .4909467 1000 −7.66247 — −7.66807 — −7.82561 1 .04701( −2) The second system which we present in this section is the hydr ogen molecular ion H+ 2in a strong longitudinal electric ﬁeld. Our approach allowe d us to carry out the ﬁrst correct consideration of this system [37] and, in pa rticular, to obtain the potential curves of its ground state, presented in Figure 7 ( left). The minima in these curves give the equilibrium internuclear distances, presented in this Figure (right) as a function of the electric ﬁeld strength. One can s ee that at a critical value of the electric ﬁeld about 0.065 a.u. the minimum disap pears and, thus, above this critical value the hydrogen molecular ion cannot exist . This critical value of the maximal electric ﬁeld Fc= 0.065a.u.= 3.3V/˚A for the molecule H+ 2is in a good agreement with experimental results by [47]. According thi s work H+ 2molecule may exist in laser beam ﬁelds with intensity less than 1014W/cm2which corresponds to 3V/˚A, and does not exist in more intense ﬁelds. FIGURE 7. Left – Potential curves for the ground state of the H+ 2molecule in longitudinal electric ﬁeld F(a.u.). Right - The equilibrium internuclear distance of th e molecule H+ 2as a function of the applied electric ﬁeld strength.TABLE 5. Equilibrium internuclear distances and corresponding en- ergies and half-widths of the energy of the ground state of H+ 2molecule in longitudinal electric ﬁelds. F R 0 E0 Γ/2F R 0 E0 Γ/2 0.00 1.997 -0.60264 — 0.04 2.062 -0.60686 1.23(-19) 0.01 2.001 -0.60289 — 0.05 2.112 -0.60943 7.32(-15) 0.02 2.012 -0.60366 — 0.06 2.198 -0.61285 1.49(-11) 0.03 2.031 -0.60497 — 0.065 2.28 -0.61501 3.94(-10) VII CONCLUSIONS In this communication we have presented a 2D fully numerical mesh solution method in its various applications to atoms and simple diato mic molecules in strong external electric and magnetic ﬁelds. Speciﬁcally these ar e calculations of atoms withZ≤10 and their positive ions in strong magnetic ﬁelds and the co mprehensive investigation of the electronic structure of the ground sta tes of the Li and C atoms in arbitrary magnetic ﬁelds. For the carbon atom seven diﬀer ent electronic ground state conﬁgurations for diﬀerent domains of the magnetic ﬁe ld strength have been found. The investigation of the series of atoms with Z≤10 in very strong magnetic ﬁelds enables us to evaluate the applicability of the adiaba tic approximation and to show its decreasing precision for heavier atoms. The mathematical technique developed for solving Schr¨ odi nger equations for quasi-steady states allowed us to obtain a series of results for the hydrogen atom in parallel electric and magnetic ﬁelds and for the H+ 2ion in strong electric ﬁelds. Thus, the method described above allows us to obtain a number of new physical results partially presented in this communication. These c alculations are carried out in the Hartree-Fock approximation for multi-electron s ystems and are exact solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equation for the single-elec tron case. As the following development of the method we plan to implement the conﬁgurat ion interaction approach in order to study correlation eﬀects in multi-elec tron systems both in electric and magnetic ﬁelds. REFERENCES 1. Friedrich, H.; Wintgen, D. Phys.Rep. 1989, 183,37. 2. R¨ osner, W.; Wunner, G.; Herold, H.; Ruder, H. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1984, 17,29. 3. Ivanov, M.V. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1988, 21,447. 4. Kravchenko, Yu.P.; Liberman, M.A.; Johansson, B. Phys.Rev.Lett. 1996, 77,619. 5. Elliott, R.J.; Loudon, R. J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 1960, 15196. 6. Neuhauser, D.; Koonin, S.E.; Langanke, K. Phys. Rev. A 1986, 33,2084;1987, 36, 4163. 7. Demeur, M.; Heenen, P.-H.; Godefroid, M. Phys. Rev. A 1994, 49,176.8. Garstang, R.H. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1977, 40,105. 9. Simola, J.; Virtamo, J. J. Phys. B 1978, 11,3309. 10. Friedrich, H. Phys. Rev. A 1982, 26,1827. 11. Fonte, G.; Falsaperla, P.; Schriﬀer, G.; Stanzial, D. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 41,5807. 12. Schmidt, H.M. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1991, 24,2947. 13. Mueller, R.O.; Rao, A.R.P.; Spruch, L. Phys. Rev. A 1975, 11,789. 14. Virtamo, J. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 1976, 9,751. 15. Larsen, D.M. Phys. Rev. B. 1979, 20,5217. 16. Gadiyak, G.V.; Lozovik, Yu.E.; Mashchenko, A.I.; Obrec ht, M.S. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 1982, 15,2615. 17. Vincke, M.; Baye, D. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1989, 22,2089. 18. Ivanov, M.V. Opt. Spektrosk. 1991, 70,259; English transl.: Opt. Spectrosc. 1991, 70,148. 19. Thurner, G.; K¨ orbel, H.; Braun, M.; Herold, H.; Ruder, H .; Wunner G. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1993, 26,4719. 20. Ivanov, M.V. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1994, 27,4513. 21. Jones, M.D.; Ortiz, G.; Ceperley, D.M. Phys. Rev. A. 1996, 54,219. 22. Jones, M.D.; Ortiz, G.; Ceperley, D.M. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55,6202;Phys. Rev. A 1999, 59,2875. 23. Henry, R.J.; O’Connell, R.F.; Smith, E.R.; Chanmugam, G .; Rajagopal, A.K. Phys. Rev. D 1974, 9,329. 24. Surmelian, G.L.; Henry, R.J.; O’Connell, R.F. Phys. Lett. A 1974, 49,431. 25. Becken, W.; Schmelcher, P.; Diakonos, F.K. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1999, 32,1557. 26. Becken, W.; Schmelcher, P. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2000, 33,545. 27. M¨ uller, E. Astron. & Astrophys. 1984, 130,415. 28. Ivanov, M.V. Phys. Lett. A 1998, 239,72. 29. Ivanov, M.V.; Schmelcher, P. Phys. Rev. A 1998, 57,3793. 30. Ivanov, M.V.; Schmelcher, P. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 60,3558. 31. Ivanov, M.V.; Schmelcher, P. Phys. Rev. A 2000, 61,022505. 32. Laaksonen, L.; Pyykk¨ o, P.; Sundholm, D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 96,1. 33. Kobus, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 202,7. 34. Vincke, M.; Malegat, L.; Baye, D. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1993, 26,811. 35. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A.; eds. “Handbook of Mathema tical Functions”; Dover Publications: New York, 1972, 787. 36. Ruder, H.; Wunner, G.; Herold, H.; Geyer, F. “Atoms in Str ong Magnetic Fields”; Springer-Verlag, 1994. 37. Ivanov, M.V. Opt. Spektrosk. 1994, 76,711. English transl.: Opt. Spectrosc. 1994, 76,631. 38. Ivanov, M.V. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1998, 31,2833. 39. Ivanov, M.V. to be published. 40. Anokhin, S.B.; Ivanov, M.V. Vestn. Leningr. Univ. Fiz. & Khim. 1983, no.2, 65. 41. Ivanov, M.V. USSR Comput. Math. & Math. Phys. 1986, 26,140. 42. Simon, B. Phys. Lett. A 1979, 71,211. 43. Kolosov, V.V. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 1987, 20,2359.44. Kolosov, V.V. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1989, 22,833. 45. Nicolaides, C.A.; Gotsis, H.J. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 1992, 25,L171. 46. Nicolaides, C.A.; Themelis, S.I. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 45,349. 47. Bucksbaum, P.H.; Zavriyev, A.; Muller, H.G.; Schumache r, D.W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 1883.
arXiv:physics/0006018v1 [physics.chem-ph] 7 Jun 2000Excited states of the hydrogen molecule in magnetic ﬁelds: The singlet Σstates of the parallel conﬁguration P. Schmelcher, T.Detmer and L. S. Cederbaum Theoretische Chemie, Physikalisch–Chemisches Institut, Universit¨ at Heidelberg, INF 229, D–69120 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany Excited states of the hydrogen molecule subject to a homogen eous magnetic ﬁeld are investigated for the parallel conﬁguration in the complete regime of ﬁeld strengths B= 0−100a.u.. Up to seven excitations are studied for gerade as well as ungerade spin s inglet states of Σ symmetry with a high accuracy. The evolution of the potential energy curves for t he individual states with increasing ﬁeld strength as well as the overall behaviour of the spectru m are discussed in detail. A variety of phenomena like for example the sequence of changes for the di ssociation channels of excited states and the resulting formation of outer wells are encountered. Possible applications of the obtained data to the analysis of magnetic white dwarfs are outlined. I. INTRODUCTION Matter which is exposed to strong external magnetic ﬁelds ch anges its basic properties and structure and leads to a variety of new phenomena. As a result strong ﬁelds are of i mportance in diﬀerent branches of physics like atomic, molecular or solid state physics. For atomic and mol ecular systems there are two prominent possibilities to encounter the strong ﬁeld regime: highly excited Rydberg st ates in the laboratory and atoms and molecules in the atmospheres of magnetized white dwarfs (see refs. [1–3] for a compilation of the subject). From a theorists point of view particle systems in strong ﬁelds pose a hard problem due to several competing interactions (Coulomb attraction and repulsion, para- and diamagnetic interactions). Of par ticular interest, but most complicated to investigate, is hereby the so-called intermediate regime which is characte rized by comparable magnetic and Coulomb binding forces. Focusing on the low-lying states of atoms and molecules we en visage this regime for those magnetic white dwarfs which possess ﬁeld strengths in the regime 103−105T. Each magnetic white dwarf possesses a characteristic regi me of ﬁeld strengths which varies, in case of a dipole, by a facto r of two from the pole to the equator. To perform a ﬁrst identiﬁcation of observed spectra from the atmospher es of these objects one uses the so-called stationary line spectroscopy: characteristic absorption features ca n appear only for those wavelengths which correspond to an extremum of the transition wavelength with respect to the ﬁeld strength. In a second step one then performs simulations of the radiation transport in the atmosphere in order to obtain synthetic spectra. In the eighties the above approaches have been used to identify hydrogen in a num ber of magnetized white dwarfs [4–7]. Recently the stationary line argument has been successfully [8] used to o btain strong evidence for helium in the spectrum of the magnetic white dwarf GD229 whose absorption features have b een mysterious ever since its discovery 25 years ago. This was only possible due to the enormous progress achieved with respect to our knowledge of the spectrum and transitions of the helium atom in strong magnetic ﬁelds [9,1 0]. However, this should not obscur the fact that there are a number of magnetic white dwarfs whose spectra remain un explained and furthermore new magnetic objects are discovered (see, for example, Reimers et al [11] in the co urse of the Hamburg survey of the European Southern Observatory (ESO)). Very recently strong candidates for qu asimolecular absorption features have been discovered in magnetized white dwarfs [12]. This raises the demand for a theoretical investigation of molecular properties, in particular of the hydrogen molecule, in such strong ﬁelds. Several theoretical investigations were performed for mol ecular systems in strong magnetic ﬁelds. Most of them deal with the electronic structure of the H+ 2ion (see refs. [13–19] and references therein). Very intere sting phenomena can be observed already for this simple diatomic system. For the ground state of the H+ 2molecule the dissociation energy increases and the equilibrium internuclear distanc e simultaneously decreases with increasing ﬁeld strength. Furthermore it was shown [18, 19] that a certain class of exci ted electronic states, which possess a purely repulsive potential energy surface in the absence of a magnetic ﬁeld, a cquire a well-pronounced potential well in a suﬃciently strong magnetic ﬁeld. Moreover the electronic potential en ergies depend not only on the internuclear distance but also on the angle between the magnetic ﬁeld and the molecular axis which leads to a very complex topological behavior of the corresponding potential energy surfaces [14–16]. In contrast to the H+ 2ion there exist only a few investigations dealing with the el ectronic structure of the hydrogen 1molecule in the presence of a strong magnetic ﬁeld. Highly ex cited states of H2were studied for a ﬁeld strength of 4.7Tin ref. [20]. For intermediate ﬁeld strengths two studies of almost qualitative character investigate the potential energy curve (PEC) of the lowest1Σgstate [21,22]. A few investigations were performed in the hi gh ﬁeld limit [23–26], where the magnetic forces dominate over the C oulomb forces and therefore several approximations can be used. Very recently a ﬁrst step has been done in order to elu cidate the electronic structure of the H2molecule for the parallel conﬁguration, i.e. for parallel internuclear and magnetic ﬁeld axes [27–30]. Hereby refs. [27,28] apply a n exact, i.e. fully correlated approach, whereas refs. [29,3 0] use Hartree-Fock calculations and focus exclusively on t he identiﬁcation of the global ground state of the molecule. In refs. [27,28] the lowest states of the Σ and Π manifolds were studied for gerade and ungerade parity as well as single t and triplet spin symmetry. Hereby accurate adiabatic electronic energies were obtained for a broad range of ﬁeld s trengths from ﬁeld free space up to strong magnetic ﬁelds of 100a.u.A variety of interesting eﬀects were revealed. As in the case of theH+ 2ion, the lowest strongly bound states of Σ symmetry, i.e. the lowest1Σg,3Σgand1Σustate, show a decrease of the bond length and an increase of the dissociation energy for suﬃciently strong ﬁelds. Furth ermore a change in the dissociation channel occurs for the lowest1Σustate between B= 10.0 and 20.0a.u.due to the existence of strongly bound H−states in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld. The3Σgstate was shown to exhibit an additional outer minimum for in termediate ﬁeld strengths which could provide vibrationally bound states. An important result of refs. [27,29] is the change of the grou nd state from the lowest1Σgstate to the lowest3Σu state between B= 0.1 and 0.2a.u.This crossing is of particular relevance for the binding pro perties of the global ground state of the molecule: The3Σustate is an unbound state and possesses only a very shallow va n der Waals minimum which does not support any vibrational level. There fore, the global ground state of the hydrogen molecule for the parallel conﬁguration is an unbound state for B>∼0.2a.u.. Furthermore it has been shown in ref. [25] that for very strong ﬁelds ( B>∼3×103a.u.) the strongly bound3Πustate is the global ground state of the hydrogen molecule oriented parallel to the magnetic ﬁeld. Finally the complet e scenario for the crossovers of the global ground state of the parallel conﬁguration has been clariﬁed in ref. [28] whi ch contains the transition ﬁeld strengths for the crossings among the lowest states of1Σg,3Σuand3Πusymmetry. The above considerations show that detailed studies of the e lectronic properties of the hydrogen molecule in a magnetic ﬁeld are very desirable. The present investigatio n deals with the excited Σ states of the hydrogen molecule in the parallel conﬁguration which is distinct by its higher symmetry [31]. We employ a full conﬁguration interaction (CI) approach which is most suitable for obtaining detailed information on the electronic structure. Our investigatio n is divided into two separate studies: the ﬁrst and present wo rk focuses on singlet states of both gerade and ungerade symmetry whereas a later investigation will focus on the cor responding triplet states again for both parities. Due to the spin Zeeman splitting the spin singlet and triplet man ifolds are increasingly separated with increasing ﬁeld strength. The spin character provides therefore a natural d ividing line of our extensive work which contains a large amount of information and data on the behaviour of the excite d states of the molecule. The results of our calculations include accurate adiabatic PECs for the complete range of ﬁe ld strengths 0 ≤B≤100a.u.. Up to seven excited states have been investigated for each symmetry. We present detailed data for the total and dissociation energies at the equilibrium internuclear distances as well as the equil ibrium positions themselves for the lowest three excitatio ns for each symmetry. Due to the large amount of data the evoluti on of the higher excited states with increasing ﬁeld strength is presented only graphically. However, further i nformations like, for example, the positions of the maxima and the accurate heights of the barriers or the complete data of the PEC’s as well as numerical data on the higher excited states, more precisely, on the fourth up to the seven th excited state, can be obtained from the authors upon request. In detail the paper is organized as follows. In section II we d escribe the theoretical aspects of the present investiga- tion, including a discussion of the Hamiltonian, a descript ion of the atomic orbital basis set and some remarks on the CI approach. Section III contains the results and an elabora te discussion of the evolution of the electronic structure in the presence of the magnetic ﬁeld with increasing strengt h. II. THEORETICAL ASPECTS Our starting point is the total nonrelativistic molecular H amiltonian in Cartesian coordinates. The total pseu- domomentum is a constant of motion and therefore commutes wi th the Hamiltonian [32, 33]. For that reason the Hamiltonian can be simpliﬁed by performing a so-called pseu doseparation of the center of mass motion [32, 34,35] which introduces the center of mass coordinate and the conse rved pseudomomentum as a pair of canonical conjugated variables. Further simpliﬁcations can be achieved by a cons ecutive series of unitary transformations [34,35]. In order to separate the electronic and nuclear motion we per form the Born-Oppenheimer approximation in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld [34–36]. As a ﬁrst order approxim ation we assume inﬁnitely heavy masses for the nuclei. 2The origin of our coordinate system coincides with the midpo int of the internuclear axis of the hydrogen molecule and the protons are located on the zaxis. The magnetic ﬁeld is chosen parallel to the zaxis of our coordinate system and the symmetric gauge is adopted for the vector potential. The gyromagnetic factor of the electron is chosen to be equal to two. The Hamiltonian, therefore, takes on the follo wing appearance: H=2/summationdisplay i=1/braceleftbigg1 2p2 i+1 8(B×ri)2+1 2LiB−1 \|ri−R/2\|−1 \|ri+R/2\|/bracerightbigg +1 \|r1−r2\|+1 R+SB (1) The symbols ri,piandLidenote the position vectors, their canonical conjugated mo menta and the angular momenta of the two electrons, respectively. BandRare the vectors of the magnetic ﬁeld and internuclear distan ce, respectively andRdenotes the magnitude of R. With Swe denote the vector of the total electronic spin. Throughou t the paper we will use atomic units. The Hamiltonian (1) commutes with the following independen t operators: the parity operator P, the projection Lzof the electronic angular momentum on the internuclear axis , the square S2of the total electronic spin and the projectionSzof the total electronic spin on the internuclear axis. In ﬁel d free space we encounter an additional independent symmetry namely the reﬂections of the electron ic coordinates at the xz(σv) plane. The eigenfunctions possess the corresponding eigenvalues ±1. This symmetry does not hold in the presence of a magnetic ﬁe ld! Therefore, the resulting symmetry groups for the hydrogen molecule are D∞hin ﬁeld free space and C∞hin the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld [31]. In order to solve the ﬁxed-nuclei electronic Schr¨ odinger e quation belonging to the Hamiltonian (1) we expand the electronic eigenfunctions in terms of molecular conﬁgurat ions. In a ﬁrst step the total electronic eigenfunction Ψ tot of the Hamiltonian (1) is written as a product of its spatial p art Ψ and its spin part χ, i.e. we have Ψ tot= Ψχ. For the spatial part Ψ of the wave function we use the LCAO-MO-ans atz, i.e. we decompose Ψ with respect to molecular orbital conﬁgurations ψofH2, which respect the corresponding symmetries (see above) an d the Pauli principle: Ψ =/summationdisplay i,jcij[ψij(r1,r2)±ψij(r2,r1)] =/summationdisplay i,jcij[Φi(r1)Φj(r2)±Φi(r2)Φj(r1)] The molecular orbital conﬁgurations ψijofH2are products of the corresponding one-electron H+ 2molecular orbitals Φiand Φ j. TheH+ 2molecular orbitals are built from atomic orbitals centered at each nucleus. A key ingredient of this procedure is a basis set of nonorthogonal optimized n onspherical Gaussian atomic orbitals which has been established previously [37,38]. For the case of a H2−molecule parallel to the magnetic ﬁeld these basis function s read as follows: φm kl(ρ,z,α,β, ±R/2) =ρ\|m\|+2k(z∓R/2)lexp/braceleftBig −αρ2−β(z∓R/2)2/bracerightBig exp{imφ} (2) The symbols ρ= +/radicalbig x2+y2andzdenote the electronic coordinates. m,kandlare parameters depending on the subspace of the H-atom for which the basis functions have bee n optimized and αandβare variational parameters. We remark that the nonlinear optimization of the variationa l parameters αandβhas to be accomplished for typically of the order of 100 atomic orbitals and is done by reproducing many excited states of the hydrogen atom for each ﬁeld strength separately. It represents therefore a tedious and time consuming work which has, however, to be done with great care in order to obtain precise results for the followi ng molecular structure calculations. For a more detailed description of the construction of the molecular electroni c wave function we refer the reader to Ref. [27]. In order to determine the molecular electronic wave functio n ofH2we use the variational principle which means that we minimize the variational integral/integraltext Ψ∗HΨ/integraltext Ψ∗Ψby varying the coeﬃcients ci. The resulting generalized eigenvalue problem reads as follows: (H−ǫS)c=0 (3) where the Hamiltonian matrix His real and symmetric and the overlap matrix is real, symmetr ic and positive deﬁnite. The vector ccontains the expansion coeﬃcients. The matrix elements of t he Hamiltonian matrix and the overlap matrix are certain combinations of matrix elements with respect to the optimized nonspherical Gaussian atomic orbitals. A description of the techniques necessary for the evaluation of these matrix elements is given in Ref. [27]. We mention here only that the electron-electron i ntegrals needed a combination of numerical and analytical 3techniques in order to make its rapid evaluation possible. T he latter represents the CPU time dominating factor for the construction of the Hamiltonian matrix. For the numerical solution of the eigenvalue problem (3) we u sed the standard NAG library. The typical dimension of the Hamiltonian matrix for each subspace varies between a pproximately 2000 and 5000 depending on the magnetic ﬁeld strength. Depending on the dimension of the Hamiltonia n matrix, it takes between 70 and 250 minutes for simultaneously calculating one point of a PEC of each subspa ce on a IBM RS6000 computer. The overall accuracy of our results with respect to the total energy is estimated t o be typically of the order of magnitude of 10−4and for some cases of the order of magnitude of 10−3. It should be noted that this estimate is rather conservativ e; in some ranges of the magnetic ﬁeld strength and internuclear dista nce, e.g., close to the separated atom limit, the accuracy is 10−5or even better. The positions, i.e. internuclear distances , of the maxima and the minima in the PECs were determined with an accuracy of 10−2a.u.Herefore about 350 points were calculated on an average for e ach PEC. It was not necessary to further improve this accuracy since a ch ange in the internuclear distance about 1 ×10−2a.u. results in a change in the energy which is typically of the ord er of magnitude of 10−4or smaller. The total CPU time needed to complete the present work amounts to several years on the above powerful computer. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION To understand the inﬂuence of the external magnetic ﬁeld on t he electronic structure of the hydrogen molecule we ﬁrst have to remind ourselves of the properties in the absenc e of the ﬁeld. Accurate data for hydrogen are of great importance both in astrophysics as well as laboratory physi cs. It is a paradigm for many molecular phenomena like charge transfer, excitation, ionization or scattering pro cesses. Indeed our CI calculations on the basis of an anisotr opic Gaussian basis set provided also signiﬁcant progress with r espect to the knowledge of the ﬁeld-free excitations of the molecule: several highly excited states have been calculat ed for the ﬁrst time and some of the PECs for the lower lying states have been improved. The corresponding results have been presented to some detail in ref. [39] and contain elaborate information on the ﬁrst eight excited singlet and triplet states for both gerade and ungerade parity. In the following we will ﬁrst summarize the main properties of the e xcited singlet states in the absence of the ﬁeld and then investigate the electronic structure in the presence of the magnetic ﬁeld with increasing ﬁeld strength. We hereby ﬁrst deal with the gerade and subsequently with the ungerade states. A. Excited gerade singlet states 1. Field-free states The investigation of the electronic states and PECs has been done for all internuclear distances considered (0 .8≤ R≤1000a.u.) with the same atomic orbital basis set. The latter has been o ptimized to yield precise energies (accuracy 10−6−10−9) of the hydrogen atom for the six lowest states for both parit ies for vanishing atomic magnetic quantum number. Additionally, in order to describe correlation eﬀe cts, we have included basis functions with atomic magnetic quantum numbers 1 ≤ma≤5. The approximate number of two-particle conﬁgurations re sulting from the above basis set is 3800. The accuracy of the electronic energies fo r the higher excited states n1Σ+ g,n= 7−9 (nindicates the degree of excitation) is, due to the above choice of the op timized basis set, lower than that for less excited states. Figure 1 shows the PECs for the states n1Σ+ g,n= 2−9 where the dotted lines represent the curves for the higher excited states n= 7−9. There is a large energetical gap (0 .3−0.4a.u.) between the ground and the excited states of1Σ+ gsymmetry. The ﬁrst ﬁve excited states are well-known from th e literature [40]. Our calculations [39] show in most cases an agreement within 10−6−5·10−5compared to the literature and in several cases also a variat ionally lower energy. As already mentioned the results on the higher excited states ( n= 7−9) have for the ﬁrst time been reported very recently in ref. [39]. As can be seen from ﬁgure 1 all the PECs of the states n1Σ+ g,n= 2−9 possess a deep potential well around a minimum located approximately at R= 2a.u.. A particular feature occuring for most of the considered1Σg(u) states is the existence of a second outer minimum and therefo re the corresponding PECs exhibit a double well. Vibrational states in these outer wells [40] attracted rece ntly signiﬁcant experimental interest [41] since they allo w the experimental observation of long-lived and highly excited valence states of the hydrogen molecule. The two minima of the 31Σ+ gstate arise due to the fact that two diﬀerent conﬁgurations o f the same symmetry, namely the 1 σg3dσg and the 1σg2sσgconﬁgurations, are energetically minimized at two signiﬁc antly diﬀerent internuclear distances. The deep outer wells of the n1Σ+ g,n= 2,4,7 states arise due to a series of avoided crossings between th e Heitler-London conﬁgurations H(1s)+H(nl) and the ionic conﬁgurations H+−H−(1s2). Particularly the 71Σ+ gstate possesses a very 4broad and deep (0 .015473a.u.!) outer potential well which is separated by a broad barrier from the inner well located atR≈2a.u.. The outer minimum is located at R≈33.7a.u.. A series of avoided crossings at very large internuclear distancesR≈300a.u.leads to the energetically equal dissociation limits H(1s) +H(4l) of then1Σ+ g,n= 7−9 states. The dissociation channel of the 101Σ+ gstate is the ionic conﬁguration H++H−(1s2). Tables 1 to 3 contain (among the data in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld) the total a nd dissociation energies at the equilibrium internuclear distances, the equilibrium internuclear distances and the total energies in the dissociation limit for the ﬁrst to thir d excited1Σ+ g,n= 2−4 states in the absence of the magnetic ﬁeld. 2. Evolution in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld The subspace of1Σgsymmetry contains the electronic ground state of the hydrog en molecule in ﬁeld-free space and in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld in the regime 0 <B < 0.1a.u.For a detailed discussion of the appearance of this state and the global ground state with increasing ﬁeld stren gth in general we refer the reader to refs. [24,25,27–30] (see also introduction of the present work). In the followin g we investigate the evolution of the excited n1Σg,n= 2−8 states with increasing magnetic ﬁeld strength for the regim e 0<B < 100a.u.. We will ﬁrst study the changes of the PECs of individual states with increasing ﬁeld strength and thereafter we present a global view of the evolution of the spectrum. In order to compare the PECs for the same state for d iﬀerent ﬁeld strengths we subtract from the total energies the corresponding energies in the dissociation li mit (which is diﬀerent for diﬀerent ﬁeld strengths), i.e. we show the quantity E(R) =Et(R)−limR→∞Et(R). In general the dissociation limit of a certain state of Σ sy mmetry changes with increasing ﬁeld strength which is due to the reo rdering of the energy levels of the atoms (hydrogen, hydrogen negative ion) in the external ﬁeld. For the atomic s tates we will use in the following the notation nmπaa wherenspeciﬁes the degree of excitation and ma,πathe atomic magnetic quantum number and z-parity, respectiv ely. Let us begin our investigation of the evolution of individua l states with increasing ﬁeld strength with the 21Σgstate whose PECs are shown in Figure 2a. The positions of the two min ima and the corresponding maximum decrease with increasing ﬁeld strength. The depth of the inner potent ial well decreases for B<∼0.5a.u.and increases rapidly forB>∼1a.u.. The depth of the outer well is monotonically increasing for the complete regime 0 <B < 100a.u.. For B<∼0.01a.u.andB>∼50a.u.the inner well is therefore deeper than the outer well and vic e versa for 0 .05<∼B<∼ 20.0a.u.(see ﬁgure 2a). The dissociative behaviour of the PECs chang es signiﬁcantly with increasing ﬁeld strength. The origin of these changes is the fact that for B<∼10a.u.the dissociation channel is H2→H(10+) +H(10−) whereas for B>∼20a.u.we have the asymptotic behaviour H2→H++H−(10+ s) (the index sstands for spin singlet). The appearance of the ionic conﬁguration as the dissociatio n channel for the low-lying electronic 21Σgstate can be explained as follows. It is well-known that the hydrogen neg ative ion possesses inﬁnitely many bound states in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld of arbitrary strength assuming a n inﬁnite nuclear mass [44,45]. Certain of these bound states show a monotonically increasing binding energy with increasing ﬁeld strength. The latter surpass then more and more of the energy levels belonging to two hydrogen atoms one being in the global ground state and the other one in the corresponding excited state. For a suﬃciently str ong magnetic ﬁeld we therefore expect the conﬁguration H++H−(10+ s) to become the dissociation channel particularly for the ﬁr st excited state of1Σgsymmetry. Due to the long range forces the onset of the asymptotic ( R→ ∞) behaviour of the corresponding PECs with the ionic channel (H++H−) is qualitatively diﬀerent from the PECs with a neutral diss ociation limit ( H+H). This explains the diﬀerent asymptotic behaviour of the PECs shown in ﬁgure 2a w ith increasing ﬁeld strength. Finalizing the discussion of the 21Σgstate we remark that its PECs possesses a second maximum for 0 .01<∼B<∼5.0a.u.which however occurs at large internuclear distances ( R≈20a.u.) and is only of the order of 10−4a.u.above the dissociation limit. Table 1 contains relevant data of the PECs of the 21Σgstate with increasing ﬁeld strength. Next we turn to the second excited i.e. the 31Σgstate whose PECs are shown in ﬁgure 2b. The positions of the tw o minima and the corresponding maximum already present in ﬁel d-free space decrease monotonically with increasing ﬁeld strength. Starting from B= 0a.u.the depth of the inner well decreases with increasing ﬁeld st rength whereas it increases for B>∼0.5a.u.. Besides a very small interval of ﬁeld strengths the depth of the outer well increases with increasing ﬁeld strength. For B≤5.0a.u.the outer well is deeper than the inner one whereas for B>∼10a.u. the deep inner well dominates the shape of the PEC. We remark t hat the curvature at the (ﬁrst) maximum and the outer minimum increases signiﬁcantly with increasing ﬁ eld strength. The evolution of these increasingly sharper turns can only be fully understood if one looks at the complet e spectrum (see ﬁgure 3 and in particular 3(e)) with increasing ﬁeld strength: they develop due to a number of nar row avoided crossing of the ﬁrst to third excited states in strong ﬁelds. An interesting property of the PEC of the 31Σgstate is the existence of an additional outer (third) minimum for the interval 0 .01<∼B<∼10a.u.which is shown in ﬁgure 2c. This minimum arises due to the inte raction with the ionic conﬁguration H++H−. In ﬁeld-free space the lowest and only bound ionic channel H++H−(10+ s) is the dissociation channel of the 101Σ+ gstate. With increasing ﬁeld strength the hydrogen negative ion becomes 5increasingly stronger bound (see discussion above) and the refore it occurs as the dissociation channel for the sequenc e of excited states 91Σg,81Σg,...ﬁnally becoming the dissocation channel of the 21Σgstate forB>∼20a.u.. The existence of the additional outer minimum becomes now under standable: due to the energetical lowering of the ionic dissociation channel with increasing ﬁeld strength the hig her excited states of1Σgsymmetry evolve outer minima and corresponding wells for certain regimes of the ﬁeld strengt h. For the 31Σgstate this outer well is extremely shallow forB<∼0.05a.u.and therefore almost invisible in ﬁgure 2c. For B>∼0.1a.u.it becomes however well-pronounced. BetweenB= 0.5a.u.andB= 1.0a.u.there occurs a change with respect to the dissociation chann el of the 31Σg. For 0< B<∼0.5a.u.the dissociation channel is H(10+) +H(20+) and for 1.0<∼B<∼10a.u.it isH++H−(0+ s). The similar asymptotic behaviour of the PECs belonging to diﬀer ent ﬁeld strengths (see ﬁgure 2c for B= 1.0,5.0 and 10.0) arises due to the fact that they possess all the ionic disso ciation channel. In the latter regime the position of the (third) outer minimum increases with increasing ﬁeld st rength (for B= 10.0a.u.the outer minimum is located at≈85a.u.). Finally there is a second change of the dissociation chann el of the 31Σgstate toH(10+) +H(10−) and therefore the outer minimum disappears for B>∼20a.u.. Table 2 contains the total and dissociation energies at the equilibrium internuclear distances, the equilibrium inte rnuclear distances and the total energies in the dissociati on limit for the second excited 31Σ+ gstate in the regime 0 <B < 100a.u. Next we focus on the third excited 41Σgwhose PECs with increasing ﬁeld strength are shown in ﬁgure 2 d. In ﬁeld-free space it possesses two minima and associated pote ntial wells located at R= 1.97a.u.andR= 11.21a.u., respectively. The position of the inner minimum increases w ith increasing ﬁeld strength whereas the corresponding dissociation energy decreases. Finally for B≈0.2a.u.the associated well disappears but reappears for B>∼0.5a.u.. With further increasing ﬁeld strength the position of this i nner minimum decreases and the depth of the corresponding well increases monotonically for B>∼1a.u.. Independently of this ﬁrst inner minimum and the outer mini mum there appears for B>∼0.2a.u.an additional third minimum and corresponding well (see tab le 3 and ﬁgure 2d) for small internuclear distances 1 −3a.u.. Although this new minimum and well are energetically well b elow the dissociation limit forB>∼20.0a.u.they are separated from the other inner minimum only by a tiny barrier. These facts will become better understandable in the context of our discussi on of the evolution of the whole spectrum with increasing ﬁeld strength (see below). The properties of the PEC of the 41Σgstate at large internuclear distances are somewhat analogous to that of the 31Σgstate. The outer minimum has its origin in the interaction of the neutral H+Hand ionicH++H−conﬁgurations. Starting with B= 0 and increasing the ﬁeld strength the depth of the outer wel l increases. The ﬁrst change of the dissociation channel from H2→H(10+) +H(30+) toH2→H++H−(10+ s) occurs in the regime 0 .1< B < 0.2a.u.. In the regime 0 .1<∼B<∼1.0a.u.the position of the outer minimum increases with increasing ﬁeld strength (for B= 0.5a.u.it is already R= 50a.u.) and the depth of the outer well decreases. Due to the further increasing binding energy of the hydrogen negative ion 10+ sstate with increasing ﬁeld strength we encounter a second change of the dissociation channel at B≈1.0a.u.toH2→H(10+) +H(20+) which causes the disappearance of the outer minimum and well. Table 3 provide s the corresponding data for the 41Σgstate. The PECs of the 51Σgand 61Σgstates are shown in ﬁgures 2e and 2f, respectively. For both s tates the positions of the maxima and minima as well as the corresponding total en ergies show an ’irregular’ behaviour as a function of the ﬁeld strength for B<∼2.0a.u.. We therefore focus on the main features of these states. For certain regimes of the ﬁeld strength we observe double well structures for the P ECs. Analogously to the n1Σg,n= 2−4 states there exist additional outer minima and wells due to the interacti on with the ionic conﬁguration for certain ﬁeld strength regimes. For B >2.0a.u.the position of the ﬁrst inner minimum decreases rapidly wit h increasing ﬁeld strength whereas the corresponding dissociation energy increases. Also we observe the existence of minima whose energies lie above the dissociation energy, i.e. the corresponding well s contain if at all metastable states. We remark that some of the above-discussed features, in particular those assoc iated with small energy scales, might not be visible in the corresponding ﬁgures 2 but only in a zoom of the relevant regi mes of internuclear distances of the considered PECs. We again emphasize that due to the large amount of data we do no t present full PECs or data on the higher excited statesn1Σg,n= 5−8 which can be obtained from the authors upon request. 3. Discussion of the evolution of the complete spectrum In the present subsection we focus on the evolution of the com plete spectrum of the excited n1Σg,n= 2−8 states with increasing ﬁeld strength. This will give us the complem entary information to the evolution of individual states presented above. Figure 3a-f shows the corresponding PECs f or the ﬁeld strengths B= 0.01,0.1,0.5,5.0,100.0a.u., respectively. The PECs of the ﬁve energetical lowest excite d statesn1Σg,n= 2−6 are hereby illustrated with full lines indicating their higher accuracy whereas the PECs of t he electronic states n1Σg,n= 7,8 are less accurate and illustrated with dotted lines. Before we discuss the evolut ion with increasing ﬁeld strength some general remarks are in order. The energy gap between the ground state 11Σgand the ﬁrst excited state 21Σgis of the order of 0 .4a.u.in 6ﬁeld-free space and increases montonically with increasin g ﬁeld strength. At the same time the total energies of all statesn1Σgare shifted in lowest order proportional to Bwith increasing ﬁeld strength which is due to the raise of the kinetic energy in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld. In ﬁeld-free space many of the dissocation channels of the PE Cs of excited1Σgstates are degenerate due to the degeneracies of the ﬁeld-free hydrogen atom (see ﬁgure 1 and 4). The major diﬀerence of the PECs in ﬁeld-free space compared to those for weak ﬁelds is the removal of these degen eracies (see, for example, ﬁgure 3a for B= 0.01a.u.). With increasing ﬁeld strength ﬁgures 3a-d ( B= 0.01,0.1,0.5and5.0a.u.) demonstrate the systematic lowering of the diabatic energy curve belonging to the ionic conﬁguration H++H−(1s2). This diabatic curve passes through the spectrum with increasing ﬁeld strength thereby causing an i ntriguing evolution of avoided crossings and correspondin g potential wells for the individual states. At B≈0.1a.u.the fourth excited 51Σgstate acquires the ionic dissociation channel. The 71Σgstate thereby looses its outer potential well which was very well-pronounced in the absence of the external ﬁeld. In the same course the 31Σgstate shows a number of avoided crossings with the 21Σgstate: it develops an additional outer minimum and well which is rathe r deep atB≈0.5a.u.accompanied by the ﬂattening of the ﬁrst inner well and the deepening of the second inner we ll. Furthermore we observe for B≈0.5a.u.the appearance of a large number of avoided crossing among the hi gher excited states n1Σg,n= 5−8 atR≈5a.u.. AtB≈0.2a.u.the third excited 41Σgstate acquires the ionic dissociation channel. Subsequent ly, i.e. with further increasing ﬁeld strength, the second excited 31Σgstate (see ﬁgure 3d) and ﬁnally the ﬁrst excited 21Σgstate acquire ionic character for suﬃciently large internuclear distanc es. In the high ﬁeld situation (see ﬁgure 3e for B= 100a.u.) only the energetically lowest excited state possess a well- pronounced double well structure and the overall picture is dominated by the fact that the PECs of the considered state s possess a very similar shape and are energetically very close to each other in particular around the inner minim um at small internuclear distances. Figure 3f shows for B= 100a.u.a zoom of the series of avoided crossings occuring for the hig her excited states n1Σg,n= 5−10 in the regime 2<R< 12a.u.. B. Excited ungerade singlet states 1. Field-free states The four energetically lowest states of1Σ+ usymmetry at B= 0 have been investigated in detail and with high accuracy in the literature [42]. Our results [39] show a rela tive accuracy of 10−4for the energies of the 11Σ+ ustate and of 10−5for the ﬁrst two excited states i.e. the n1Σ+ u,n= 2,3 states. The energies of the 41Σ+ ustate are signiﬁcantly lower than the data presented in [42]. The PECs for the n1Σ+ u,n= 4−9 presented in ref. [39] for the ﬁrst time are estimated to possess an accuracy of 10−5for then1Σ+ u,n= 4−6 states and 10−4for then1Σ+ u,n= 7−9 states. Figure 4 shows the PECs of the ground as well as eight excited s tates of1Σ+ usymmetry in the range 1 <R< 1000a.u. on a logarithmic scale. The PEC of the ground state 11Σ+ uof ungerade symmetry possesses a minimum at R= 2.43a.u.and a corresponding deep well. A closer look at the wave function reveals its ioni c character for 3 <R < 7a.u.. With further increasing internuclear distance the ionic character of the wave funct ion decreases and the corresponding dissociation channel isH2→H(1s) +H(2p). The PEC of the ﬁrst excited 21Σ+ ustate is similar to that of the ground state 11Σ+ u: its equilibrium internuclear distance is Req= 2.09 the dissociation channel is identical to that of the 11Σ+ ustate. The depth of its single well is however only one third of the depth of the well of the 11Σ+ ustate. For the higher excited states we observe a similar behaviour as in the case of the exc ited electronic states of1Σ+ gsymmetry. The PECs of then1Σ+ u,n= 3−9 states possess a deep well around a minimum located approxi mately atR≈2a.u.. Furthermore then1Σ+ u,n= 3,6 states exhibit additional deep outer potential wells at la rge internuclear distances which arise due to the avoided crossings of the Heitler-London conﬁgura tions with the corresponding ionic conﬁguration. The outer minimum of the 61Σ+ ustate is located at 33 .7a.u.and the corresponding well possesses a remarkable depth of 0.015134a.u.: it is expected to contain a large number of long-lived vibra tional states. Tables 4 to 6 contain (among the data in the presence of the magnetic ﬁeld) the total and di ssociation energies at the equilibrium internuclear distances, the equilibrium internuclear distances and the total energies in the dissociation limit for the ﬁrst to thir d excited1Σ+ ustates in the absence of the magnetic ﬁeld. 2. Evolution in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld First of all we remark that the dissociation channels of the ( n+1)1Σgstates coincide with those of the n1Σustates forn= 1−7 in the complete regime 0 ≤B≤100a.u.. The qualitative behaviour of the PECs of the n1Σustates at 7large internuclear distances is therefore similar to that o f the (n+ 1)1Σgstates discussed in the previous section. In particular many of the explanations and remarks provided th ere hold also for the present case of the n1Σustates. Before discussing the behaviour of the PECs of the individua l excitedn1Σustates with increasing ﬁeld strength some remarks concerning the lowest, i.e. ground state of1Σusymmetry are in order (for its PEC with increasing ﬁeld strength see ﬁgure 6). Its dissociation energy increas es monotonically with increasing ﬁeld strength whereas its equilibrium internuclear distance increases slightly for weak ﬁelds and decreases signiﬁcantly for increasingly str onger ﬁelds. As indicated above the asymptotic R→ ∞ behaviour of the PECs of the 11Σuand 21Σgstates is very similar. ForB= 100a.u.the PEC of the 11Σustate possesses a peculiar shape which is largely determine d by the ionic dissociation channel H++H−(10+ s) (see ﬁgure 6f). For more details on this state we refer the re ader to ref. [27,28]. The ﬁrst excited 21Σustate possesses in ﬁeld-free space an equilibrium internuc lear distance Req= 2.09a.u.. Figure 5a shows the corresponding PEC with increasing ﬁeld strengt h for 0 ≤R≤5a.u.whereas ﬁgure 5b illustrates particularly the behaviour at large internuclear distance s. In the regime 0 ≤B<∼0.2a.u.the dissociation energy decreases slightly and the bond length increases. With furt her increasing ﬁeld strength the dissociation energy increases drastically and the bond length decreases. For 0 .1<∼B<∼50a.u.there exists a maximum and a corresponding additional outer minimum at large internuclear distances ( see ﬁgure 5b) whose origin is again the emergence of the ionic conﬁguration for the wave function of the 21Σustate. Figure 5b also demonstrates the similarity of the asy mptotic R→ ∞ behaviour of the PECs of the 21Σustate in the regime 1 .0≤B≤10.0a.u.. The corresponding data for the PECs of the ﬁrst excited 21Σustate are given in table 4. Turning to the second excited 31Σustate we observe that the depth of the potential well located forB= 0a.u. atReq= 2.03a.u.decreases for weak ﬁelds whereas it increases signiﬁcantly for strong ﬁelds B>∼1.0a.u.(see ﬁgure 5c). The existence of an additional outer minimum for this st ate can be seen in ﬁgure 5d. In many respects a similar behaviour to that of the 21Σustate is observed although, of course, the regimes of ﬁeld st rength for which the individual phenomena take place are diﬀerent. Table 5 co ntains the corresponding data of the PECs of the 31Σu state. Finally ﬁgures 5e and 5f show the PECs of the n1Σu,n= 4,5 states with increasing ﬁeld strength, respectively. They exhibit a number of maxima and minima most of which can ho wever hardly be seen in ﬁgures 5e,f or occur at large internuclear distances. The origin of their existe nce are again the diﬀerent (ionic and neutral) dissociation channels. These maxima and minima are present only for certa in individually diﬀerent regimes of the ﬁeld strength. Some of them are located above and some of them below the disso ciative threshold. As can be seen the bond length (belonging to the inner minimum) decreases monotonically a nd the dissociation energy increases signiﬁcantly above some critical value Bc. The inner minimum and associated well possesses a remarkab ly large dissociation energy for strong ﬁelds. Table 6 provides data on the PECs of the 41Σustate. To ﬁnalize our discussion on the1Σusubspace we show in ﬁgure 6 the evolution of the spectrum with in- creasing ﬁeld strength. Figures 6a-f show the PECs for the n1Σu,n= 1−8 states for the ﬁeld strengths B= 0.05,0.1,0.5,1.0,10.0,100.0a.u., respectively. Analogously to the case of the1Σgsubspace we observe for weak ﬁelds the removal of the degeneracies due to the ﬁeld-free hy drogen atom in the dissociation limit. With increas- ing ﬁeld strength we see the lowering of the diabatic energy l ine belonging to the ionic conﬁguration which causes the appearance and disappearance of outer maxima, minima an d corresponding outer potential wells until ﬁnally (B= 100a.u.) the 11Σustate possess the ionic dissociation channel H2→H++H−(10+ s) which is the origin of the peculiar shape of its PEC. A number of further observations m ade for the manifold of the n1Σg,n= 1−8 states above can also be seen for the n1Σu,n= 1−8 states in ﬁgure 6 like, for example, the similar shape of the potential wells of the excited states in the high ﬁeld limit. IV. CONCLUSIONS The hydrogen molecule is the most fundamental molecular sys tem and of immediate importance in a variety of diﬀerent physical circumstances. In spite of the fact that i t has been investigated over the past decades in great detail and that our knowledge on this system has grown enormo usly there are plenty of questions and problems to be addressed even for the molecule in ﬁeld-free space. As an e xample we mention certain highly excited Rydberg states (71Σ+ g,61Σ+ u) which, due to the ionic character of the binding for certain regimes of the internuclear distance, possesses a deep outer well at large distances which contain s a considerable number of vibrational states. On the other hand the detailed knowledge of hydrogen (even of highly exci ted states) is of utmost importance for our understanding and interpretation of the astrophysically observed inters tellar radiation. Much less is known about the behaviour of the hydrogen molecu le in strong magnetic ﬁelds. With increasing ﬁeld strength the ground state of the molecule undergoes two transitions which are due to a change of the spin and orbital character, respectively. Very recently the glo bal ground state conﬁgurations have been identiﬁed for the parallel conﬁguration (there are good reasons which lead to the conjecture that the derived results hold for arbitrary 8angle of the internuclear and magnetic ﬁeld axis) both on the Hartree-Fock level [29, 30] and via a fully correlated approach [27, 28]. For low ﬁelds the ground state is of spin si nglet1Σgsymmetry, for intermediate ﬁelds the spin triplet3Σustate represent the ground state whereas in the high ﬁeld reg ime the3Πustate is the energetically lowest state. The present work goes for the ﬁrst time beyond the ground stat e properties and investigates excited states of the hydrogen molecule in the broad regime 0 <B < 100a.u.. We hereby focus on singlet states of both gerade as well as ungerade symmetry: up to seven excited states have been stud ied for the parallel conﬁguration with a high accuracy of the obtained PECs. A variety of diﬀerent phenomena have be en observed out of which we mention here only the most important ones. Double well structures observed in par ticular for the ﬁeld-free n1Σ+ gstates are severly modiﬁed in the presence of the ﬁeld thereby showing a ’coming and goin g’ of new maxima and minima as well as corresponding wells. The overall tendency in the strong ﬁeld limit is the de velopment of deep inner wells containing a large number of vibrational states. In the course of the increasing ﬁeld str ength a fundamental phenomenon occurs which has a strong impact on the overall shape of the PECs. Due to the fact that th e hydrogen negative ion becomes increasingly bound with increasing ﬁeld strength we encounter changes in the di ssociation channels of individual states from neutral H2→H+H∗to ionicH2→H++H−character. For a certain regime of ﬁeld strength Bc1< B < B c2a certain excited state possesses therefore the ionic dissociation c hannel thereby modifying the asymptotic behaviour of its PEC to an attractive Coulombic tail. For weaker ﬁelds B <B c1higher excited states possess this ionic dissociation channel whereas for stronger ﬁelds B > B c2it belongs to increasingly lower excitations. These facts i nﬂuence the overall appearance of the spectrum thereby creating featur es like outer potential wells and/or largely changing avoid ed crossings. The data on the PECs of the excited singlet states obtained he re should serve as part of the material to be accumulated for the investigation of quasimolecular absor ption features in magnetic white dwarfs. The investigation of excited triplet states of Σ symmetry or of Π states, which a re of equal importance, are left to future investigations. V. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Fruitful discussions with W.Becken are gratefully acknowl edged. The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is gratefully acknowledged for ﬁnancial support. [1] H.Friedrich and D.Wintgen, Phys.Rep. 183, 37 (1989) [2] H. Ruder, G. Wunner, H. Herold und F. Geyer, Atoms in Stron g Magnetic Fields, Springer Verlag A&A 1994. [3] Atoms and Molecules in Strong External Fields, Plenum Pr ess New York (1998), ed. by P.Schmelcher and W.Schweizer [4] H. Forster, W. Strupat, W. R¨ osner, G. Wunner, H. Ruder, H . Herold, J.Phys.B 17, 1301 (1984) [5] R.J.W. Henry, R.F. O’Connell, Astrophys.J. 282, L97 (1984) [6] D.T. Wickramasinghe, L. Ferrario, Astrophys. J. 327, 222 (1988) [7] S. Jordan, Lecture Notes in Physics 328, 333 Springer (1989) [8] S. Jordan, P. Schmelcher, W. Becken and W. Schweizer, Ast ron.& Astrophys. 336L33-L36 (1998) [9] W. Becken, P. Schmelcher and F.K. Diakonos, J. Phys.B 32, 1557 (1999) [10] W. Becken and P. Schmelcher, subm.to J. Phys.B [11] D. Reimers, S. Jordan, V. Beckmann, N. Christlieb, L. Wi sotzki, Astr.& Astrophys. 337(1998) L13 [12] S. Jordan, private communication [13] U. Wille, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3210 (1988). [14] U. Kappes and P. Schmelcher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 3869 (1996). [15] U. Kappes and P. Schmelcher, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1313 (1996). [16] U. Kappes and P. Schmelcher, Phys. Lett. A 210, 409 (1996). [17] Yu. P. Kravchenko and M. A. Liberman, Phys. Rev. A 55, 2701 (1997). [18] U. Kappes, P. Schmelcher, and T. Pacher, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3775 (1994). [19] U. Kappes and P. Schmelcher, Phys. Rev. A 51, 4542 (1995). [20] T. S. Monteiro and K. T. Taylor, J. Phys. B 23, 427 (1990). [21] S. Basile, F. Trombetta, and G. Ferrante, Nuovo Cimento 9, 457 (1987). [22] A. V. Turbiner, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 38, 510 (1983), [JETP Lett. 38, 618 (1983)]. [23] A. V. Korolev and M. A. Liberman, Phys. Rev. A 45, 1762 (1992). [24] D. Lai, E. E. Salpeter, and S. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 45, 4832 (1992). 9[25] G. Ortiz, M. D. Jones, and D. M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. A 52, R3405 (1995). [26] D. Lai and E. E. Salpeter, Phys. Rev. A 53, 152 (1996). [27] T. Detmer, P. Schmelcher, F. K. Diakonos, and L. S. Ceder baum, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1825 (1997) [28] T. Detmer, P. Schmelcher, and L. S. Cederbaum, Phys. Rev . A57, 1767 (1998) [29] Yu. P. Kravchenko and M.A. Liberman, Phys.Rev. A 56, R2510 (1997) [30] Yu. P. Kravchenko and M.A. Liberman, Phys.Rev. A 57, 3403 (1998) [31] P. Schmelcher and L. S. Cederbaum, Phys. Rev. A 41, 4936 (1990). [32] B. Johnson, J. Hirschfelder, and K. Yang, Rev. Mod. Phys .55, 109 (1983). [33] J. E. Avron, I. W. Herbst, and B. Simon, Ann. Phys. 114, 431 (1978). [34] P. Schmelcher, L. S. Cederbaum, and H.-D. Meyer, Phys. R ev. A38, 6066 (1988). [35] P. Schmelcher, L. S. Cederbaum, and U. Kappes, in ”Conceptual Trends in Quantum Chemistry”, edited by Euge ne S. Kryachko (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994). [36] P. Schmelcher, L. S. Cederbaum, and H.-D. Meyer, J. Phys . B21, L445 (1988). [37] P. Schmelcher and L. S. Cederbaum, Phys. Rev. A 37, 672 (1988). [38] U. Kappes and P. Schmelcher, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2878 (1994). [39] T. Detmer, P. Schmelcher and L.S. Cederbaum, J.Chem.Ph ys.109, 9694 (1998) [40] L.Wolniewicz, J.Chem.Phys. 99, 1851 (1993);J.Chem.Phys. 108, 1499 (1998) [41] E.Reinhold, W.Hogervorst and W.Ubachs, Phys.Rev.Let t.78, 2543 (1997) [42] K.Dressler and L.Wolniewicz, Ber.Bunsenge.Phys.Che m.99, 246 (1995) [43] W.Kolos and L.Wolniewicz, J.Chem.Phys. 45, 509 (1966) [44] J.E. Avron, I.W. Herbst and B. Simon, Commun. Math. Phys .79, 529 (1981) [45] V.G.Bezchastnov, P.Schmelcher and L.S.Cederbaum, su bm.f.publ. FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1: The potential energy curves of the excited n1Σ+ g,n= 2−9 electronic states of the hydrogen molecule in the absence of a magnetic ﬁeld. Figure 2: The evolution of the potential energy curves for some excite d1Σgelectronic states of the hydrogen molecule in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld 0 <B < 100a.u.. In detail are shown the evolution of the PECs for the (a) 21Σg, (b) 31Σg, (c) zoom of 31Σg, (d) 41Σg, (e) 51Σgand (f) 61Σgstates, respectively. Shown is the quantity E(R) =Et(R)−limR→∞Et(R) whereEt(R) is the total energy. Figure 3: The spectrum of potential energy curves for the excited n1Σg,n= 2−8 electronic states of the hydrogen molecule in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld 0 <B < 100a.u.with increasing ﬁeld strength. In detail are shown the PECs for (a) B= 0.01 (b)B= 0.1 (c)B= 0.5 (d)B= 5.0 (e)B= 100.0 and (f) zoom of B= 100.0a.u., respectively. Figure 4: The potential energy curves of the excited n1Σ+ u,n= 1−9 electronic states of the hydrogen molecule in the absence of a magnetic ﬁeld. Figure 5: The evolution of the potential energy curves for some excite d1Σuelectronic states of the hydrogen molecule in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld 0 <B < 100a.u.. In detail are shown the evolution of the PECs for the (a) 21Σg, (b) zoom of 21Σg, (c) 31Σg, (d) zoom of 31Σg, (e) 41Σgand (f) 51Σgstates, respectively. Shown is the quantity E(R) =Et(R)−limR→∞Et(R) whereEt(R) is the total energy. Figure 6: The spectrum of potential energy curves for the excited n1Σu,n= 1−8 electronic states of the hydrogen molecule in the presence of a magnetic ﬁeld 0 <B < 100a.u.with increasing ﬁeld strength. In detail are shown the PECs for (a) B= 0.05 (b)B= 0.1 (c)B= 0.5 (d)B= 1.0 (e)B= 10.0 and (f)B= 100.0a.u., respectively. 10Tables TABLE I. Data for the ﬁrst excited1Σgstate: Total energies Et1, Et2and dissociation energies Ed1, Ed2at the corresponding equilibrium internuclear distance, the equilibrium inter nuclear distances Req1, Req2and the total energy in the dissociation limit lim R→∞Etas a function of the ﬁeld strength 0 ≤B≤100 (all quantities are given in atomic units). B Req1 Ed1 Et1 Req2 Ed2 Et2lim R→∞Etot 0.0 1.91 0.093122 -0.718121 4.39 0.089241 -0.714240 -0.624 999 0.001 1.91 0.093120 -0.718117 4.39 0.089242 -0.714239 -0.6 24997 0.005 1.91 0.093061 -0.718017 4.39 0.089252 -0.714208 -0.6 24956 0.01 1.91 0.092878 -0.717703 4.39 0.089289 -0.714114 -0.62 4825 0.05 1.90 0.087831 -0.708672 4.39 0.090459 -0.711300 -0.62 0841 0.1 1.88 0.077017 -0.686953 4.38 0.093325 -0.703261 -0.609 936 0.2 1.88 0.057630 -0.633195 4.33 0.100709 -0.676274 -0.575 565 0.5 1.89 0.040502 -0.462472 4.08 0.122427 -0.544397 -0.421 970 1.0 1.78 0.044819 -0.135993 3.76 0.150618 -0.241792 -0.091 174 2.0 1.54 0.067740 0.612336 3.37 0.191218 0.488858 0.680076 5.0 1.18 0.140991 3.130994 2.88 0.269224 3.002761 3.271985 10.0 0.95 0.245637 7.623918 2.55 0.351756 7.517799 7.86955 5 20.0 0.76 0.359056 16.960943 2.27 0.408351 16.911648 17.31 9999 50.0 0.56 0.575262 45.784366 1.96 0.471572 45.888056 46.35 9628 100.0 0.44 0.821768 94.614199 1.76 0.521822 94.914145 95.4 35967 TABLE II. Data for the second excited1Σgstate: Total energies Et1−Et3and dissociation energies Ed1−Ed3at the corresponding equilibrium internuclear distance, the equ ilibrium internuclear distances Req1−Req3and the total energy in the dissociation limit lim R→∞Etas a function of the ﬁeld strength 0 ≤B≤100 (all quantities are given in atomic units). B Req1 Ed1 Et1 Req2 Ed2 Et2 Req3 Ed3 Et3lim R→∞Etot 0.0 2.03 0.035466 -0.660465 3.27 0.038014 -0.663013 -0.624999 0.001 2.03 0.035462 -0.660458 3.27 0.038021 -0.663017 -0.624996 0.005 2.03 0.035399 -0.660305 3.27 0.038045 -0.662951 -0.624906 0.01 2.03 0.035225 -0.659851 3.27 0.038101 -0.662727 18.97 0.000007 -0.624633 -0.624626 0.05 2.04 0.033199 -0.649592 3.20 0.040478 -0.656871 10.56 0.001510 -0.617903 -0.616393 0.1 2.03 0.030981 -0.626596 3.06 0.048089 -0.643704 10.02 0 .006992 -0.602607 -0.595615 0.2 1.94 0.023894 -0.563261 2.86 0.064882 -0.604249 10.43 0 .026352 -0.565719 -0.539367 0.5 1.90 0.030305 -0.378302 2.73 0.079773 -0.427788 10.69 0 .066892 -0.414907 -0.348015 1.0 1.78 0.039842 -0.041327 2.50 0.091331 -0.092816 10.96 0 .085978 -0.087463 -0.001485 2.0 1.54 0.042657 0.717581 2.22 0.089173 0.671065 12.14 0.0 79131 0.681107 0.760238 5.0 1.19 0.075290 3.248431 1.86 0.091565 3.232156 19.38 0.0 51644 3.272077 3.323721 10.0 0.96 0.131036 7.749942 1.63 0.093390 7.787588 85.58 0. 011423 7.869555 7.880978 20.0 0.76 0.275591 17.095639 1.44 0.142076 17.229154 17.371230 50.0 0.56 0.605249 45.931209 1.22 0.250618 46.285840 46.536458 100.0 0.45 0.976059 94.770524 1.09 0.357751 95.388832 95.746583 11TABLE III. Data for the third excited1Σgstate: Total energies Et1−Et3and dissociation energies Ed1−Ed3at the corresponding equilibrium internuclear distance, the equ ilibrium internuclear distances Req1−Req3and the total energy in the dissociation limit lim R→∞Etas a function of the ﬁeld strength 0 ≤B≤100 (all quantities are given in atomic units). B Req1 Ed1 Et1 Req2 Ed2 Et2 Req3 Ed3 Et3lim R→∞Etot 0.0 1.97 0.099408 -0.654963 11.21 0.049597 -0.605152 -0.555555 0.001 1.97 0.099397 -0.654944 11.21 0.049604 -0.605151 -0.555547 0.005 1.97 0.099051 -0.654469 11.21 0.049686 -0.605104 -0.555418 0.01 1.97 0.098011 -0.653029 11.21 0.049930 -0.604948 -0.555018 0.05 1.99 0.081038 -0.625896 2.93 0.068063 -0.612921 11.39 0.055502 -0.600360 -0.544858 0.1 2.05 0.075239 -0.597699 12.04 0.06419 -0.586650 -0.522460 0.2 2.46 0.067543 -0.546109 15.62 0.059554 -0.538120 -0.47856 6 0.5 1.91 0.022150 -0.350029 2.35 0.035929 -0.363808 50.06 0 .020138 -0.348017 -0.327879 1.0 1.77 0.019181 -0.010815 2.17 0.030750 -0.022384 0.008366 2.0 1.53 0.053756 0.750088 1.95 0.058173 0.745671 0.803844 5.0 1.19 0.142822 3.283035 1.67 0.116673 3.309184 3.425857 10.0 0.96 0.257211 7.786043 1.50 0.176832 7.866422 8.043254 20.0 0.76 0.427463 17.133303 1.34 0.249318 17.311448 17.560766 50.0 0.56 0.768452 45.971004 1.16 0.362134 46.377322 46.739456 100.0 0.45 1.142090 94.811929 1.05 0.464011 95.490008 95.954019 TABLE IV. Data for the ﬁrst excited1Σustate: Total energies Et1Et2and dissociation energies Ed1Ed2at the corresponding equilibrium internuclear distance, the equilibrium inter nuclear distances Req1Req2, the positions Rmax, and the total energy Emaxat the maximum, and the total energy in the dissociation limi t lim R→∞Etas a function of the ﬁeld strength 0 ≤B≤100 (all quantities are given in atomic units). B Req1 Ed1 Et1 Req2 Ed2 Et2 Rmax Emaxlim R→∞Etot 0.0 2.09 0.040772 -0.665771 -0.624999 0.001 2.08 0.040770 -0.665766 -0.624996 0.005 2.09 0.040697 -0.665603 -0.624906 0.01 2.09 0.040477 -0.665103 -0.624626 0.05 2.12 0.037068 -0.653461 -0.616393 0.1 2.13 0.036237 -0.631852 9.37 0.008169 -0.603784 5.16 -0 .602345 -0.595615 0.2 2.12 0.043756 -0.583123 10.09 0.027637 -0.567004 4.60 - 0.555876 -0.539367 0.5 2.03 0.065201 -0.413216 10.34 0.068386 -0.416401 4.01 - 0.382377 -0.348015 1.0 1.85 0.079251 -0.080736 10.55 0.087513 -0.088998 3.66 - 0.038398 -0.001485 2.0 1.59 0.085790 0.674448 11.46 0.080259 0.679979 3.34 0.7 44375 0.760238 5.0 1.22 0.121736 3.201985 10.49 0.052138 3.271583 2.95 3.3 49758 3.323721 10.0 0.98 0.178133 7.702800 9.70 0.011729 7.869204 2.69 7.9 55928 7.880933 20.0 0.78 0.321481 17.049749 9.27 0.000271 17.370959 2.46 1 7.464313 17.371230 50.0 0.57 0.646721 45.889737 9.04 0.000168 46.536290 2.21 4 6.635075 46.536458 100.0 0.45 1.012902 94.733681 9.04 95.746735 2.05 95.84694 5 95.746583 12TABLE V. Data for the second excited1Σustate: Total energies Et1Et2and dissociation energies Ed1Ed2at the correspond- ing equilibrium internuclear distance, the equilibrium in ternuclear distances Req1Req2, the positions Rmax, and the total energy Emaxat the maximum, and the total energy in the dissociation limi t lim R→∞Etas a function of the ﬁeld strength 0 ≤B≤100 (all quantities are given in atomic units). B Req1 Ed1 Et1 Req2 Ed2 Et2 Rmax Emaxlim R→∞Etot 0.0 2.03 0.081441 -0.636996 11.12 0.049964 -0.605519 5.65 - 0.567698 -0.555555 0.001 2.03 0.081426 -0.636973 11.12 0.049971 -0.605518 5.6 4 -0.567692 -0.555547 0.005 2.03 0.081009 -0.636427 11.12 0.050053 -0.605471 5.6 4 -0.567528 -0.555418 0.01 2.03 0.080107 -0.635125 11.18 0.050291 -0.605309 5.67 -0.567116 -0.555018 0.05 2.04 0.074463 -0.619321 11.32 0.055802 -0.600660 5.45 -0.555308 -0.544858 0.1 2.05 0.071675 -0.594135 12.01 0.064313 -0.586773 5.40 - 0.530941 -0.522460 0.2 2.03 0.062081 -0.540641 15.62 0.059632 -0.538198 5.42 - 0.477396 -0.478566 0.5 1.94 0.035148 -0.363027 50.06 0.020138 -0.348017 5.20 - 0.297160 -0.327879 1.0 1.78 0.033120 -0.024754 4.92 0.058491 0.008366 2.0 1.54 0.068597 0.735247 4.56 0.858143 0.803844 5.0 1.20 0.158473 3.267384 4.06 3.490593 3.425857 10.0 0.96 0.272912 7.770342 3.70 8.118636 8.043254 20.0 0.77 0.442635 17.118131 3.38 17.648590 17.560766 50.0 0.56 0.782055 45.957401 3.02 46.845692 46.739456 100.0 0.45 2.154264 94.799755 2.81 96.074966 96.954019 TABLE VI. Data for the third excited1Σustate: Total energies Et1−Et3and dissociation energies Ed1−Ed3at the corresponding equilibrium internuclear distance, the equ ilibrium internuclear distances Req1−Req3and the total energy in the dissociation limit lim R→∞Etas a function of the ﬁeld strength 0 ≤B≤100 (all quantities are given in atomic units). B Req1 Ed1 Et1 Req2 Ed2 Et2 Req3 Ed3 Et3lim R→∞Etot 0.0 2.00 0.078543 -0.634098 5.67 0.010196 -0.565751 -0.555555 0.001 2.00 0.078531 -0.634077 5.67 0.010194 -0.565740 -0.555546 0.005 2.00 0.078211 -0.633537 5.67 0.010161 -0.565487 33.8 9 0.000058 -0.555384 -0.555326 0.01 2.00 0.077103 -0.631765 5.67 0.010059 -0.564721 34.18 0.000338 -0.555000 -0.554662 0.05 2.01 0.063148 -0.603904 5.56 0.009249 -0.550005 42.09 0.004106 -0.544862 -0.540756 0.1 2.02 0.060038 -0.577452 5.50 0.009923 -0.527337 36.87 0 .005048 -0.522462 -0.517414 0.2 2.00 0.057601 -0.522906 5.79 0.002238 -0.467543 33.92 0 .000006 -0.465309 -0.465305 0.5 1.92 0.062864 -0.343463 34.57 0.000001 -0.280600 -0.280599 1.0 1.76 0.082384 -0.003776 0.078608 2.0 1.53 0.123535 0.757397 0.880932 5.0 1.19 0.224179 3.290662 3.514841 10.0 0.96 0.348221 7.794138 8.142359 20.0 0.76 0.528386 17.142170 3.52 17.707128 17.670556 50.0 0.56 0.882660 45.981219 3.09 46.897984 46.863879 100.0 0.45 1.266401 94.823274 2.82 96.127449 96.089675 131 10 100 1000 R[a.u.]Figure 1 −0.70−0.65−0.60−0.55E[a.u.]0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 R[a.u.]−1.20−0.80−0.400.00E[a.u.]B = 0.0 a.u. B = 1.0 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 20.0 a.u. B = 100.0 a.u. (d)1.0 3.0 5.0 R[a.u.]−0.80−0.60−0.40−0.200.00E[a.u.] B = 0.0 a.u. B = 2.0 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 20.0 a.u. B = 100.0 a.u. (a) 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 R[a.u.]−1.40−1.00−0.60−0.200.20E[a.u.]B = 0.0 a.u. B = 2.0 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 20.0 a.u. B = 100.0 a.u. (e)1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 R[a.u.]−1.00−0.60−0.200.20E[a.u.]B = 0.0 a.u. B = 2.0 a.u. B = 10.0 a.u. B = 20.0 a.u. B = 100.0 a.u. (b) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 R[a.u.]−1.40−1.00−0.60−0.200.20E[a.u.]B = 0.0 a.u. B = 2.0 a.u. B = 10.0 a.u. B = 50.0 a.u. B = 100.0 a.u. (f)10 100 1000 R[a.u.]−0.08−0.040.000.04E[a.u.]B = 0.05 a.u. B = 0.2 a.u. B = 1.0 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 10.0 a.u. (c)1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.](d)3.003.203.403.60E[a.u.]1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.](a)−0.70−0.65−0.60−0.55−0.50E[a.u.] 1 10 100 R[a.u.](e) 94.595.095.596.0E[a.u.]1 10 100 1000(b)−0.70−0.65−0.60−0.55−0.50−0.45E[a.u.] 10 100 R[a.u.](f) 96.0896.1296.1696.20E[a.u.]1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.](c)−0.50−0.40−0.30−0.20E[a.u.]1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.]Figure 4 −0.75−0.70−0.65−0.60−0.55E[a.u.]1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.]−0.08−0.040.000.04E[a.u.] B = 0.0 a.u. B = 0.1 a.u. B = 0.2 a.u. B = 0.5 a.u. (d)1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 R[a.u.]−1.00−0.500.00E[a.u.]B = 0.0 a.u. B = 1.0 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 20.0 a.u. B = 100.0 a.u. (a) 1 2 3 4 R[a.u.]−1.20−0.80−0.400.00E[a.u.]B = 0.0 a.u. B = 0.2 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 20.0 a.u. B =100.0 a.u. (e)10 100 1000 R[a.u.]−0.10−0.06−0.020.020.060.10E[a.u.]B = 0.1 a.u. B = 1.0 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 10.0 a.u. B = 100.0 a.u. (b) 1 2 3 4 R[a.u.]−1.40−1.00−0.60−0.200.20E[a.u.]B = 0.0 a.u. B = 0.2 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 20.0 a.u. B = 100.0 a.u. (f)1 2 3 4 5 R[a.u.]−1.00−0.500.00E[a.u.]B = 0.0 a.u. B = 1.0 a.u. B = 5.0 a.u. B = 20.0 a.u. B= 100.0 a.u. (c)1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.](d)−0.25−0.15−0.050.050.15E[a.u.]1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.](a) −0.75−0.65−0.55E[a.u.] 1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.](e) 7.407.607.808.008.20E[a.u.]1 10 100 1000(b) −0.76−0.66−0.56−0.46E[a.u.] 1 10 100 R[a.u.](f) 94.5095.0095.5096.00E[a.u.]1 10 100 1000 R[a.u.](c)−0.50−0.40−0.30−0.20E[a.u.]
arXiv:physics/0006019v1 [physics.atom-ph] 7 Jun 2000Quantum energy ﬂow in atomic ions moving in magnetic ﬁelds V.S. Melezhik† ∗and P. Schmelcher†† †Physique Nucl´ eaire Th´ eorique et Physique Math´ ematique , C.P. 229, Universit´ e Libre de Bruxelles, B 1050 Brussels, Belgium ††Theoretische Chemie, Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut, Universit¨ at Heidelberg, INF 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Fed eral Republic of Germany (February 2, 2008) Using a combination of semiclassical and recently develope d wave packet propagation techniques we ﬁnd the quantum self-ionization process of highly excite d ions moving in magnetic ﬁelds which has its origin in the energy transfer from the center of mass t o the electronic motion. It obeys a time scale by orders of magnitude larger than the correspond ing classical process. Importantly a quantum coherence phenomenon leading to the intermittent b ehaviour of the ionization signal is found and analyzed. Universal properties of the ionization process are established. Rydberg atoms in strong external ﬁelds represent an excitin g and very active research area both experimentally as well as theoretically. During the eighties the main focus wa s on the hydrogen atom [1] assuming an inﬁnite nuclear mass which reduces the dimensionality of the system. Howeve r in general the atom possesses a nonvanishing center of mass (CM) motion in the magnetic ﬁeld giving rise to a varie ty of two-body phenomena [2]. Turning to charged two-body systems like, for example, the He+-ion the residual coupling of the CM and electronic motion is represented by an oscillating electric ﬁeld term yielding ﬁve relevant d egrees of freedom. One of the most striking eﬀects caused by the two-body character of the ion is the recently found cla ssical self-ionization process [3] which occurs due to energy transfer from the CM to the electronic motion. Since i t is well-known that quantization can severely change the eﬀects observed in classical dynamics (see ref. [4] and r efs. therein) we develop in the present work a quantum approach to the moving ion in a magnetic ﬁeld. We are interested in the regime of high level density, i.e. hi gh-lying excitations, for boththe collective as well as electronic motion which depend on a number of parameters (ﬁe ld strength, total energy consisiting of the initial CM and internal energies). The ab initio description of the qua ntum dynamics in the above regime goes even beyond modern computational possibilities and we thus seek a semic lassical approach that is capable of describing the essenti al physics of the problem. The total pseudomomentum [5] is a con served quantity associated with the CM motion. In spite of the fact that its components perpendicular to the ma gnetic ﬁeld are not independent, i.e. do not commute, it can be used to ﬁnd a suitable transformation of the Hamilto nian to a particularly simple and physically appealing form [6,7]. For the He+-ion it reads H=H1+H2+H3where H1=1 2M/parenleftbigg P−Q 2B×R/parenrightbigg2 (1) H2=αe M/parenleftbigg B×/parenleftbigg P−Q 2B×R/parenrightbigg/parenrightbigg r (2) H3=1 2m/parenleftbigg p−e 2B×r+Q 2m2 M2B×r/parenrightbigg2 +1 2M0/parenleftbigg p+/parenleftbigge 2−Q 2Mm M(M+M0)/parenrightbigg B×r/parenrightbigg2 −2e2 r. (3) Herem,M 0and M are the electron, nuclear and total mass, respectively .α= (M0+2m)/MandQis the net charge of the ion. Bis the magnetic ﬁeld vector which is assumed to point along th e z-axis. ( R,P) and ( r,p) are the canonical pairs for the CM and internal motion, respectively. The CM mo tion parallel to the magnetic ﬁeld separates exactly and undergoes a free translational motion. H1andH3depend exclusively on the CM and electronic degrees of freed om, respectively. H1describes the free motion of a CM pseudoparticle with charge Q and mass M. H3stands for the electronic motion in the presence of paramagnetic, diamagnetic as well as Coulomb interactions which, in analogy to the hydrogen atom [1], exhibits a variety of classical and quantum properties with changing p arameters, i.e. energy and/or ﬁeld strength. H2contains ∗permanent address: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, D ubna, Moscow Region 141980, Russian Federation 1the coupling between the CM and electronic motion of the ion a nd represents a Stark term with a rapidly oscillating electric ﬁeld 1 /M(B×(P−Q/2B×R)) determined by the dynamics of the ion. This coupling term i s responsible for the eﬀects and phenomena discussed in the present invest igation. The essential elements of our semiclassical approach are th e following. Since we consider the case of a rapidly moving ion in a magnetic ﬁeld a classical treatment of the CM motion c oupled to the quantized electronic degrees of freedom seems appropriate: the CM is propagated with an eﬀective Ham iltonian containing the corresponding expectation values with respect to the electronic quantum states. The la tter obey a time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation which involves the classical CM trajectory. Both the electronic a nd CM motion have to be integrated simultaneously . The key idea of this semiclassical approach goes back to refs. [8 ,9] where it has been applied to the dynamics of molecular processes. Our resulting time evolution equations read the refore as follows d dtP(t) =−∂ ∂RHcl(R(t),P(t))d dtR(t) =∂ ∂PHcl(R(t),P(t))i¯h∂ ∂tψ(r,t) =Hq(R(t),P(t),r)ψ(r,t) (4) with the eﬀective Hamiltonian Hcl(R,P) =H1+/angbracketleftψ(r,t)\|H2+H3\|ψ(r,t)/angbracketright H q(R(t),P(t),r,p) =H3(r,p) +H2(R(t),P(t),r) (5) This scheme represents a balanced treatment of the coupled c lassical and quantum degrees of freedom of the ion and takes account of the energy ﬂow among them. It possesses the i mportant property of conserving the total energy which is particularly important for the correct descriptio n of the energy transfer processes occuring in our system. Since the typical energies associated with the fast heavy CM degrees of freedom are many orders of magnitude larger than the corresponding elementary quantum (¯ hQB/M ) we expect the above scheme to yield reliable results. Our approach to the solution of the time-dependent Schr¨ odi nger equation, which yields the dynamics of an initially deﬁned wave packet ψ(r,t), is based on a recently developed nonperturbative hybrid m ethod [10–12]. It uses a global basis on a subspace grid for the angular variables ( θ,φ) and a variable-step ﬁnite-diﬀerence approximation for th e radial variable. The angular grid is obtained from the nodes of the corresponding Gaussian quadrature with respect toθandφ, which is in the spirit of the discrete variable techniques y ielding a diagonal representation for any local interaction [10]. As a consequence one remains with the Schr ¨ odinger-type time-dependent radial equations coupled only through non-diagonal matrix elements of the kinetic en ergy operator. This vector equation is propagated using a splitting-up method [13], which permits a simple diagonal ization procedure for the remaining non-diagonal part [11,12]. Our scheme is unconditionally stable, saves unita rity and has the same order of accuracy as the conventional Crank-Nickolson algorithm, i.e. ∼O(∆t2) where ∆tis the time step size. In order to avoid reﬂections of the wave packet from the right edge of the radial grid we introduce abs orbing boundary conditions. The extension of the radial grid is chosen (see below) such that it exceeds the center of t he radial distribution of the initial wave packet by more than one order of magnitude. The typical frequencies associ ated with the motion of the Rydberg electron and the CM motion are diﬀerent by several orders of magnitude (see re f. [3]). To investigate the quantum energy transfer mechanisms requires therefore the integration of the above equations of motion for a typical time which is a multiple of the time scale of the heavy particle (CM). This correspond s to many thousand cycles of the Rydberg electron. Such a detailed investigation would have been impossible withou t the use of the above-described combination of highly eﬃcient techniques. We assume that the He+ion is accelerated up to some value ECMof the kinetic energy of the CM motion and its electron is being excited to some Rydberg state nlmin ﬁeld-free space. Thereafter it enters the magnetic ﬁeld. In the following we choose ECM= 100a.u.,n = 25,l=m= 0 and a strong laboratory ﬁeld B= 10−4a.u.(23.5Tesla ). The intial CM velocity is vCM= 0.1656a.u.and oriented along the x−axis. We remark that taking the above values for nlm,B for theHe+ion with the assumption of an inﬁnitely heavy nucleus the cor responding classical phase space is dominated by chaotic trajectories. Figs. (1a,1b) illust rate results for the propagation of the wave packet with increasing time. More precisely we show the intersection of the integrated quantity Ψ( ρ,z,t) =/integraltext \|ψ\|2dφalong the cylindricalρ-axis forz= 0 (ﬁg.1a) and its intersection along the z-axis forρ= 0 (ﬁg.1b). Fig. 1a demonstrates that the motion of the wave packet is conﬁned by the diamagnetic in teraction with respect to the ρ-direction, i.e. the direction perpendicular to the magnetic ﬁeld. For any propa gation time its value drops by several orders of magnitude at some outer value ρcfor theρcoordinate. As we shall see below (see also ﬁgure 3) the varia tion ofρcis accompanied by a corresponding change in the internal/CM energies there by demonstrating the ﬂow of energy between the CM and electronic degrees of freedom. Fig. 1b demonstrates tha t there is for certain time intervals (see below) almost no decay of the wave packet for large distances of the z−coordinate. Therefore we encounter a signiﬁcant ﬂux of probability parallel to the external ﬁeld. Reaching the bou ndary of our radial grid rm= 20000a.u.it is absorbed and considered to represent the ionized state. Having estab lished the existence of an ionizing probability ﬂux paralle l to the magnetic ﬁeld we immediately realize from ﬁg.1b that t his ﬂux is by no means constant in time but varies strongly. To see this more explicitly and also to gain an idea of the overall decay of the wave packet we show in ﬁg.2 2the decay of the norm of the wave packet for a time which roughl y corresponds to one cyclotron period 2 πM/(QB) of the free CM motion in the ﬁeld. Fig. 2 shows apart from an overa ll monotonous decay of the norm, which is due to the quantum self-ionization process, an amazing new featur e: the norm exhibits an alternating sequence of plateaus and phases of strong decay. The widths of the plateaus slight ly increases with increasing time. This intermittent behaviour of the ionization signal from the moving ions is a p ure quantum phenomenon, i.e. does not occur in the corresponding classical ionization rates [3]. Furthermor e the calculation of the classical ionization rates for the s ame parameters (ﬁeld strength, energies) yields a typical ioni zation time which is by two orders of magnitude smaller than the one obtained by the quantum calculation. The ionization process is therefore signiﬁcantly slowed down through the quantization of the system which is in the spirit of the qu antum localization processes shown to exist in a variety of diﬀerent physical systems (see ref. [4] and refs. therein ). The observed slowing down of the ionization process represents one important diﬀerence of the classical and qua ntum behaviour of the moving ion which occurs in spite of the fact that we are dealing with a highly excited system. The obvious question of the origin of the intermittent occur rence of the plateaus and ionization bursts arises now. At this point it is helpful to consider the behaviour of the CM energy as a function of time which is illustrated in ﬁg. 3. Starting with ECM= 100a.u.att= 0 we observe a fast drop of it for short times yielding a minim um ofECM at approximately t1= 4×107a.u.. Thereafter it raises and reaches a maximum at approximatel yt2= 1.2×108a.u. after which it drops again, i.e. it shows an overall oscillat ing behaviour. The “valleys” of ECMcoincide with the plateaus of the norm decay whereas the regions with higher CM velocities correspond to phases of a strong norm decay of the wave packet. The increase of the widths of the pla teaus in the norm decay (see ﬁg.2) matches the corresponding decrease of the frequency of the oscillation s of the CM energy. Since the total energy is conserved this clearly shows that the ionization bursts correspond to phas es of relatively low internal energy (although certainly above the ionization threshold) whereas the phases of highe r internal energy go along with the plateaus of the norm behaviour, i.e. the localization of the electronic motion. This provides the key for the understanding of the rich structure of the norm decay. The phase of high energy for the e lectronic motion means that the magnetic interaction strongly dominates over the Coulomb interaction. This make s the electronic motion approximately separable with respect to the motion perpendicular and parallel to the magn etic ﬁeld. As a consequence the energy transfer process from the degrees of freedom perpendicular to those parallel to the external ﬁeld are very weak i.e. the ionization process is strongly suppressed. This corresponds to an almo st integrable situation for the ions dynamics. On the contrary for relatively low internal energies the Coulomb i nteraction is much more relevant and mediates together with the coupling Hamiltonian H2the energy transfer from the CM to the electron motion parall el to the magnetic ﬁeld. As a result we encounter a ﬂow of probability in the +/-z -directions which corresponds to the ionization burst. During this period of motion a comparatively strong dephasi ng of the wave packet takes place. The intermittent behaviour of the ionization rate can there fore be seen as a quantum manifestation for the switching between diﬀerent regimes of the internal energy correspond ing to weaker or stronger Coulomb interaction. Pumping energy from the CM to the electronic motion weakens the Coulo mb interaction and leads to the suppression of the ionization process whereas pushing the energy back to the CM motion decreases the internal energy and enhances the Coulomb interaction. To elucidate the time scale on whic h this process takes place we have computed the autocorrelation function C(t) =< ψ(t)\|ψ(0)>where<>means integration over the electronic coordinates. As a result we observe a modulation and recurrence of the autoco rrelation at a time scale t≈1.6×108a.u.which corresponds approximately to the recurrence of the plateau s for the norm decay. The corresponding power spectrum shows a broad peak at a frequency ω≈3.5×10−8a.u.. An important feature of the quantum self-ionization proce ss is the approximate stability of the time intervals correspond ing to the plateaus of the norm (no ionization signal) with respect to variations of the initial CM velocity of the ion. O ur investigation shows that decreasing the CM energy from 100a.u.to 12a.u.leads to a decrease with respect to the distances between the plateaus, i.e. the diﬀerence of the norm values belonging to diﬀerent plateaus, roughly by a factor of two. This corresponds to a signiﬁcant slowing down of the ionization process. However the widths of the pla teaus remain rather stable and represent therefore a universal quantity which is approximately independent of the CM velocity. Vary ing the ﬁeld strength causes a change of both the distances between the plateaus and their widths. The quantum self-ionization process should have implicati ons on the physics of atoms and plasmas occurring in a number of diﬀerent circumstances. Apart from this it obvio usly suggests itself for a laboratory experiment (the lifetime of the Rydberg states exceeds the time scale of ioni zation by orders of magnitude) which should be very attractive due to the expected intermittent ionization sig nal which is a process revealing the intrinsic structure and dynamics of the system during its diﬀerent phases of motion. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation t hrough a grant (P.S.) for the Institute for Theoret- ical Atomic and Molecular Physics at Harvard University and Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. P.S. thanks H.D.Meyer and D.Leitner for fruitful discussions. V.S.M. g ratefully acknowledges the use of the computer resources of the IMEP of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, he also thank s the PNTPM group of the Universit´ e Libre de 3Bruxelles for warm hospitality and support. [1] H.Friedrich and D.Wintgen, Phys.Rep. 183, 37 (1989) [2] P.Schmelcher and L.S.Cederbaum, ’Atoms and Molecules i n Intense Fields’, Springer Series : Structure and Bonding 86, 27 1997 [3] P.Schmelcher and L.S.Cederbaum, Phys.Rev.Lett. 74, 662 (1995); P.Schmelcher, Phys.Rev.A 52, 130 (1995) [4] F.Haake, ’Quantum Signatures of Chaos’, Springer Verla g 1991. [5] J.E.Avron, I.W.Herbst and B.Simon, Ann.Phys.(NY) 114, 431 (1978) [6] P.Schmelcher and L.S.Cederbaum, Phys.Rev.A 43, 287 (1991) [7] B.R.Johnson, J.O.Hirschfelder and K.H.Yang, Rev.Mod. Phys.55, 109 (1983) [8] K.J.McCann and M.R.Flannery, Chem.Phys.Lett. 35, 124 (1975); J.Chem.Phys. 63, 4695 (1975) [9] G.D.Billing, Chem.Phys. 9, 359 (1975) [10] V.S.Melezhik, Phys.Rev.A 48, 4528 (1993); [11] V.S.Melezhik, ’Atoms and Molecules in Strong External Fields’, p.89, edited by P.Schmelcher and W.Schweizer, Ple num Publishing Company 1998. [12] V.S.Melezhik and D.Baye, Phys.Rev.C (in press) [13] G.I.Marchuk, On the theory of the splitting-up method, inPartial Diﬀerential Equations. II. SYNSPADE-1970 (Academic, New York, 1971) Figure Captions Figure 1: (a) The intersection Ψ( ρ,z= 0,t) =/integraltext \|ψ\|2dφalong theρaxis. (b) The intersection Ψ( ρ= 0,z,t) along thezaxis. (Atomic units are used). Figure 2: The norm of the electronic wave packet as a function of time (i n units of 108atomic units). Figure 3: The CM energy as a function of time (in units of 108atomic units). 4
arXiv:physics/0006020v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 8 Jun 2000Laser generated wake ﬁelds as a new diagnostic tool for magne tized plasmas Martin Servin and Gert Brodin Department of Plasma Physics, Ume˚ a University, S-901 87 Um e˚ a, Sweden In the presence of an external magnetic ﬁeld, wake ﬁelds gene rated by a short laser pulse can propagate out of the plasma, and thereby provide informatio n about the electron density proﬁle. A method for reconstructing the density proﬁle from a measur ed wake ﬁeld spectrum is proposed and a numerical example is given. Finally, we compare our pro posal with existing plasma density diagnostic tecniques. As is well-known, a short laser pulse propagating in an underdense unmagnetized plasma can excite a wake ﬁeld of plasma oscillations [1]. This has interesting ap- plications to plasma based particle accelerators and is naturally of importance for the general understanding of laser-plasma interactions. If the plasma is magnetized and the external magnetic ﬁeld non-parallel to the di- rection of propagation of the laser pulse, the wake ﬁeld becomes partially electromagnetic and thereby obtains a nonzero group velocity [2]. In the present paper we study wake ﬁeld generation in an inhomogeneous magnetized plasma. In particular we address the question to what extent the wake ﬁeld can propagate out of the plasma, and thereby provide information about the plasma parameters. The most in- teresting case is that of a strongly magnetized plasma (i.e. when the electron cyclotron frequency is larger than the plasma frequency), for which almost all of the wake ﬁeld energy - except that generated in a narrow low den- sity region - may propagate out of the plasma. Since the wake ﬁeld also in the magnetized case initially has the frequency equal to the local plasma frequency, this provides a way of extracting information about the elec- tron density proﬁle. It turns out that even though wave overtaking – for example when a higher frequency part of the wake ﬁeld passes a lower frequency part – may occur, the density proﬁle can still be reconstructed by integrating the ray equations of geometric optics back- wards. This is more straightforward for a static back- ground density proﬁle, and a numerical example is pro- vided for this case, where the predicted spectrum of the wake ﬁeld corresponding to an assumed density proﬁle is shown, and a reconstructed proﬁle is calculated. Finally, the method is compared with two of the existing plasma density diagnostic techniques [3], namely interferometry and reﬂectometry. We consider a high frequency laser pulse with fre- quency ωHpropagating in a cold, weakly inhomogeneous magnetized plasma. We assume the ordering ωH≫ ωp, ωc, where ωpandωc≡ \|qB0\|/mare the plasma and electron cyclotron frequency respectively, qandmare the electron charge and mass, and B0=B0/hatwidexis the (con- stant) external magnetic ﬁeld. We let the laser pulse propagate perpendicularly to the external magnetic ﬁeld.The ponderomotive force of the laser pulse will gener- ate a ”low frequency” wake ﬁeld mode (which is the low frequency branch of the extraordinary mode, or plasma oscillations modiﬁed by the magnetic ﬁeld, depending on the choice of terminology) during its path through the plasma. The generation mechanism is most eﬃcient if the pulse has a duration of the order of the inverse plasma frequency or shorter. In principle, the laser pulse will broaden due to ordinary dispersion, decrease its energy and frequency due to the interaction with the wake ﬁeld, etc. These and other eﬀects have been considered in ho- mogeneous plasmas by for example Ref. [2]. We will focus on the spectral properties of the wake ﬁeld, however, and for this purpose it turns out that we can forget about the details of the laser pulse. Basically the eﬀect of the laser ﬁeld is to provide a well localized ponderomotive source term in the governing equations for the wake ﬁeld, trav- elling with almost the speed of light in vacuum. The wake ﬁeld quantities are denoted by index L. We introduce the corresponding vector and scalar potentials AL(z, t) andφL(z, t), using Coulomb gauge, and the elec- tron density is written n=n0(z, t)+nL(z, t), where n0is the unperturbed density, assumed to vary on longer space and time scales than the wake ﬁeld. Furthermore, the electron velocity vis divided into its high- and low fre- quency part, and we denote the low frequency contribu- tions perpendicular and parallel to the direction of prop- agation with vL⊥andvLzrespectively. The pondero- motive force of the laser pulse induces longitudinal wake ﬁeld motion, which couple to motion in the /hatwidey-direction through the Lorentz-force, but there is no wake ﬁeld mo- tion in the direction of the external magnetic ﬁeld, and accordingly we put AL=AL/hatwideyandvL⊥=vL⊥/hatwidey. Lin- earizing in the low frequency variables, and neglecting derivatives acting on n0, we obtain the following set of equations governing the wake ﬁeld generation −µ0qn0vL⊥+/bracketleftbig c−2∂2 t−∂2 z/bracketrightbig AL= 0 (1) c−2∂z∂tφL−µ0qn0vLz= 0 (2) ∂tvL⊥−ωcvLz+q m∂tAL= 0 (3) ∂tvLz+q m∂zφL+ωcvL⊥=−q2 2m2∂z\|AH\|2(4) ∂tnL+n0∂zvLz= 0 (5) 1Next we write this on matrix form Au=b, where u= (φL, nL, vLz, vL⊥, AL),Ais an operator matrix and bis the (ponderomotive) source vector. Since derivatives on n0are neglected, we can simplify the system (1)-(5) by a simple matrix inversion u=A−1btreating the operators inAlike constant coeﬃcients. We introduce the group velocity of the laser pulse vgH≡∂kωand eliminate dif- ferential operators in the denominators everywhere by “multiplication”. By using ∂t≈ −vgH∂z≈ −c∂zfor derivatives acting on the source vector , and focusing on the ﬁrst component of u,we ﬁnally obtain after one space and one time integration /bracketleftbig ∂4 t+ (ω2 h+ω2 p)∂2 t−(∂2 t+ω2 h)c2∂2 z+ω4 p/bracketrightbig φL=qω4 p\|A2 H\| 2m (6) where ω2 h=ω2 p+ω2 cand we recognize the operator acting onφLas the wave operator for the extraordinary mode. Although derivatives on n0have been neglected in the derivation of Eq. (6), it should be emphasized that the equations for wake ﬁeld generation is more complicated here than for a homogeneous plasma. This is because in theinhomogeneous case , the evolution of the wake ﬁeld is in general notquasi-static in a frame moving with the group velocity of the laser pulse, and thus ∂t≈ −vgH∂z≈ −c∂zdoes not hold for derivatives acting on the wake ﬁeld. It is useful to divide the study of the wake ﬁeld prop- erties into its excitation and its propagation phase. The excitation of one additional wavelength of the wake ﬁeld takes place during a distance of the order of 2 πc/ω p, and – as a basic assumption of ours – the variations of n0is negligible on this length scale. Thus as far as the excita- tion process is concerned, the plasma can essentially be treated as homogeneous. The solution for the wake ﬁeld can thus be obtained from previous authors [2]. Chang- ing to comoving coordinates ξ=z−vgHt,τ=tthe result for the wake ﬁeld potential can be written φL=φL0sin[kp(ξ−ξ0)] (7) where kpis the wake ﬁeld wavenumber kp=ωp/vgH,ξ0 is the (constant) position of the (short) laser pulse, and φL0= (qωp/mv g)/integraltext∞ −∞\|AH\|2dξ. The important result here, for our purposes, is the determination of the initial value of the wake ﬁeld wave number kp=ωp/vgH, which corresponds to an initial frequency ωp(in the laboratory frame), that will vary with the position of generation. Next we make the ansatz of geometric optics. Inspect- ing the wave operator in Eq. (6), we note that there is a resonance at ω2=ω2 h≡ω2 c+ω2 pand cut-oﬀs at ωL≡ 1 2[−ωc+ (ω2 c+ 4ω2 p)1/2] and ωR≡1 2[ωc+ (ω2 c+ 4ω2 p)1/2]. The dispersion relation has two positive roots. One branch is valid for ω > ω Rand one for ωL< ω < ω h. As the wake ﬁeld is generated with the local plasmafrequency ωp,the wake ﬁeld must belong to the latter branch. Therefore we write the dispersion relation from now on as ω=W(k, z, t)≡/braceleftBig χ−/radicalBig χ2−ω2 hc2k2−ω4p/bracerightBig1/2 (8) where χ≡(ω2 h+ω2 p+c2k2)/2. Due to the cut-oﬀ ωLand the resonance ωh, only parts of the wake ﬁeld satisfying the inequality ωL< ω < ω hat all points on its path through the plasma can leave the plasma and contribute to the wake ﬁeld spectrum. Within the geometric optics approximation, the path of diﬀerent parts of the wake ﬁeld is determined by the ray equations [5] dk dt=−∂zW,dω dt=∂tW (9) where d/dt≡∂t+vg∂z. Speciﬁcally, for a time- independent medium, the right hand side of the last equa- tion is zero and the wake ﬁeld propagates, with the local wake ﬁeld group velocity vg≡∂kωwith unchanged fre- quency. It is natural to ﬁrst consider the density proﬁle recon- struction from a wake ﬁeld in the case of a quasi-static plasma. The proposed technique can be applied not only to truly static density proﬁles but to the large class of phenomenons varying on a time scale signiﬁcantly larger than the time of propagation of the wake ﬁeld through the plasma slab. Then, sequential laser pulses gives a sequence of wake ﬁelds spectra from which a “movie” of the density proﬁle can be obtained. We assume that the generated wake ﬁeld spectrum is measured immediately outside the plasma boundary. In consistence with the geometric optics approximation we will treat the measured data as a weakly time dependent spectrum with well deﬁned sharp (quasi-monochromatic) peaks. The data is not necessarily monochromatic at a given time, however. A part of the wake ﬁeld generated at an earlier time may overtake some part of the wake ﬁeld generated at a later time, leading to a spectrum with mul- tiple sharp peaks. Generally, we can express the data as a set of distinct frequencies measured at diﬀerent times, in which case a sharp curve can be recognized, see Fig.1(a). Due to cut-oﬀs and/or resonances, the curve may be dis- continuous, and the algorithm below only works until the ﬁrst jump. Before presenting the reconstruction algorithm we need to introduce some notations. As mentioned, the mea- surement results in a function of time, in general multi- valued, describing a path ω(t) as illustrated in Fig.1(a). Let the path be discretized into consecutive points num- bered i= 0,1, ..., n,i= 0 being the ﬁrst measured point. Let also the plasma, having length L, be discretized into cells, numbered j= 1,2, ..., N , of length ∆ z=L/N so that the plasma has the plasma frequency ωp(j)at (j−1)∆z≤z≤j∆z. In order to distinguish the two dis- 2cretizations we will use upper indices for quantities dis- cretized according to the spectrum-path discretization, e.g.t(i), and lower indices for quantities discretized ac- cording to the plasma discretization, e.g. ωp(j). In par- ticular we will let z(j)≡(j−1)∆zwhereas z(i)is the “exact” point in the plasma where the wake ﬁeld corre- sponding to the i:th point in the spectrum was generated. Furthermore, it is convenient to introduce ∆ z(i), which is deﬁned in Fig.1(b). The following algorithm can be used to retrace the measured frequency spectrum and thereby reconstruct the electron density proﬁle: We assume that the points 0,1,2, ..., i−1 (grey dots in Fig.1(b)) have already been retraced so that the plasma frequency of the cells j+ 1, j+ 2, ..., N (black) is known and the plasma frequency of cell j(grey) has yet to be determined. Consider now the retracing of the next spectrum-point i, correspond- ing to the frequency ω(i)detected at time t(i). Given the plasma frequency of the already reconstructed cells, the path of spectrum point iis known up to cell j, where the plasma frequency and thereby the group velocity is yet to be determined. Since spectrum point iat least be- longs in the neigborhood of cell j,a ﬁrst guess – correct to lowest order – is that ωp(j)=ω(i). Making this guess, the path of spectrum point ican be reconstructed a bit further by comparing the detection time, t(i), with the generation time of this particular wake ﬁeld, and using the ray equations (9). In particular it can be decided whether this point belongs to cell jor cell j−1. If it belongs to cell j, the algorithm assigns the calculated position to point iand proceeds to spectrum point i+ 1. If it belongs to j−1, the cell jis ﬁlled with spectrum points and a deﬁnite plasma frequency is given to this cell, before the algorithm continues in the same manner with reconstructing cell j−1 and the path of spectrum point i+ 1.For density variations on a faster time-scale thanc/L, the above algorithm does not work. Prelimi- nary work suggests that it can be generalized to a more rapidly varying regime, however, but it would require multiple laser pulses propagating in the plasma slab si- multaneously. In order to demonstrate the method we numerically calculate a wake ﬁeld spectrum using the ray equations (9) starting from an assumed density proﬁle, see Fig.2(a). In the reconstruction algorithm this spectrum is then treated as experimental data. In this case we consider a plasma magnetized such that ωc= 1.1×ωp,max, where ωp,maxis the maximum value of the plasma frequency. For simplicity we normalize such that L= 1,c= 1, and we let the laser pulse enter the plasma at t= 0 and exit att= 1. The spectrum is obtained by treating the wake ﬁeld as a collection of point particles – jumping into exis- tence as the laser pulse propagates through the plasma – each moving with the local group velocity and the initial wavenumber and frequency determined by Eq. (7). Sincethe density proﬁle is known, in contrast to the case of re- tracing the spectrum, it is straight forward to propagate these “particles” by means of the ray equations (9). Retracing the spectrum according to the algorithm presented above results in a density proﬁle that can be compared with the one we assumed, see Fig. 2(b). A small numerical error – that can be removed with a ﬁner discretization – can be seen. Note that the entire plasma proﬁle cannot be reconstructed. The left most points in Fig. 2(b) are missing. This is because the wake ﬁeld generated in this region of low density cannot propagate through the plasma since there is a cut-oﬀ prohibiting this. The information of this region is already missing in the wake ﬁeld spectrum. Existing techniques for unperturbing plasma den- sity diagnostics include reﬂectometry and interferometry methods as well as incoherent scattering [3]. It is most natural to compare our proposal with the two former methods: Reﬂectometry essentially makes use of the re- ﬂection of electromagnetic waves against a cut-oﬀ occur- ring at a point where the frequency of the electromagnetic wave equals the local plasma frequency. The plasma fre- quency as a function of position can be derived from time- of-ﬂight measurements for a suitable spectrum of electro- magnetic waves. Applying interferometry, a laser beam is split-up into two (or more) beams. One of the beams passes through the plasma and experiences a phase shift relative to the beam propagating in vacuum. This phase shift – obtained by letting the beams interfere – is re- lated to the density averaged along the path through the plasma. In many respects our new method compare favorably with existing techniques, provided the basic criterion of a strong external magnetic ﬁeld is fulﬁlled. Some ad- vantages are: 1) Coaxial proﬁle information: Interfer- ometry can at best provide information about the den- sity proﬁle in a direction perpendicular to the penetrating laser beams (if multiple beams are used) whereas the pro- posed method reconstructs the density proﬁle along the path of the laser pulse. 2) High spatial resolution: The requirement that the length scales of inhomogeneities must be much larger than the local plasma wave length λp≡2πvg/ωpsets the spatial resolution limit to roughly 108n−1/2m for a strongly magnetized plasma ( ωc∼ωp), where nis the electron number density in units m−3. 3) High temporal resolution: The temporal resolution limit is equal to the time that separates sequential laser pulses probing the dynamics, and thus tres∼∆L/c,where ∆ L is the spatial separation of the laser pulses. For use of the ”static” density proﬁle reconstruction scheme ∆ Lmust be comparable to the width of the plasma column, imply- ing that tresis not longer than 10−8s, for typical labora- tory plasma dimensions. 4) Density minimum access In our method the density proﬁle can be measured even in the vicinity of a local density minimum, in contrast to re- ﬂectometric methods for which only monotonous proﬁles 3can be fully reconstructed. This feature together with points 2) and 3) makes it possible to study the density evolution in detail of various dynamical processes, e.g. wave propagation and instabilities, using our method. Given a suitable plasma – a regime close to thermonu- clear fusion conditions seems appropriate – the equip- ment necessary to apply the proposed scheme is ﬁrstly a laser that can produce powerful and short pulses. Com- mercial Ti:sapphire lasers typically fulﬁll these require - ments by far. Secondly, the detector need to operate over a broad frequency band and produce spectrums that are time-resolved on (roughly) the time-scale Lih/c, where Lihis the density inhomogeneity scale length. Similar detector requirements have been fulﬁlled in the applica- tions of ultra-short pulse reﬂectometry [4], however, and thus we deduce that it is notnecessary to develop new technology for our scheme to work. There are a numbers of issues not addressed in our den- sity reconstruction scheme. Firstly, what happens if the external magnetic ﬁeld is not homogeneous? This is sim- ple provided the magnetic ﬁeld proﬁle is know, since our static reconstruction scheme is essentially unaﬀected by this change, and we only need to include the correspond- ing variations in the dispersion relation (8). Secondly, what happens if the proﬁle to be reconstructed has two- or three-dimensional spatial variations? Unfortunately – unless the extra variations occur on longer spatial scales – this complicates the application a lot, at least from a practical point of view. Two parts of the wake ﬁeld gen- erated at diﬀerent positions will follow diﬀerent orbits in the plasma and exit at diﬀerent locations. By using multiple lasers and detectors placed at suitable positions , it seems possible that 3-D density proﬁles can be recon- structed in principle, but to address this question in any detail is beyond the scope of this paper. Finally we point out that the question of the usefulness of our scheme is unlikely to be settled by purely theoretical arguments, and instead we want to encourage experimental investi- gations of wake ﬁeld generation in magnetized plasmas. A ﬁrst interesting step, before complete density proﬁle reconstructions are performed, would be to experimen- tally verify that the maximum frequency of the wake ﬁeld coincide with the maximum value of the local plasma fre- quency. [1] T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. A 43, 276 (1979); L. M. Gorbunov and V. I. Kirsanov, Zh.Eksp. Theor. Fiz. 93, 509 (1987). [Sov.Phys. JETP 66, 290 (1987)]; J. M. Dawson, Phys. Scr. T 52, 7 (1994). [2] G. Brodin and Jonas Lundberg, Phys. Rev. E 57, 7041 (1998).[3] H. J. Hartfuss, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 40A231- A250 (1998); I. H. Hutchinson, Principles of plasma di- agnostics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng- land, 1987). [4] B. I. Cohen, E. B. Hooper, T. B. Kaiser, E. A. Williams and C. W. Domier, Phys. Plasmas, 6,1732 (1999). [5] G. B Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974) 4I. FIGURE CAPTIONS Fig. 1 Illustration of the discretization scheme. (a) Spectrum path discretization (b) Plasma slab discretiza- tion Fig. 2 Example of a reconstruction. (a) Predicted wake ﬁeld spectrum normalized against the maximum frequency (b) . Normalized plasma proﬁles. The solid line marks the assumed proﬁle and the crosses marks the reconstructed proﬁle. 5tω ω(i) t (i)i-1 i i+1(a) z(j) Lz(i)Δz(i) z1 0j-1jj+1Nj+2 z(j+1)(b) Figure.1(a) t1 0 1 2ω 01 z0 1(b) n0 Figure.2
arXiv:physics/0006021v1 [physics.class-ph] 8 Jun 2000A Modiﬁed Theory Of Newtonian Mechanics Amir H. Abbassi∗& Amir M. Abbassi†,‡ Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Tarbiat Modarres University,P.O.Box 14155-4838 Tehran, Iran Abstract A speciﬁc model of the inertial law is presented by which we ca n have some deeper insight into the essence of mass and inertia . In this modiﬁed theory there is no need to keep the concept of absolut e space and the third law as a principle. By introducing a convenient form for gravitational law the coupling constant G becomes a func tion of inertial parameters of the universe. Keywords: Absolute Space,Classical Theories of Gravity,Cosmology, Inertia. According to the Newton’s second law of motion the relation /vectorF=m/vector a holds between the applied force on a particle and its acceler ation in absolute space and any other frames which are related to it by Galilean transforma- tions. These reference frames are called inertal frames and mis the inertial mass of the particle. The relation between coordinates of tw o inertial sys- temsSandS′which are moving with constant velocity /vector vwith respect to each other are :   t′=t /vector a′=/vector a /vector u′=/vector u−/vector v /vector x′=/vector x−/vector vt+/vector x0(1) Despite its simple appearance and practical applications N ewton’s con- cept of absolute space which is the basis of Newtonian mechan ics (NM) and in ∗E-mail: ahabbasi@net1cs.modares.ac.ir †Permanent add: Depatment of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, T ehran University ‡E-mail: amabasi@khayam.ut.ac.ir 1turn the basis of mass and energy is not well deﬁned and has bee n criticized. Cogent arguments against absolute space are [1]: a - There is no unique way of locating Newton’s absolute space within the ﬁnite class of inertial frames. b - It conﬂicts with one’s understanding to conceive of a thin g which acts but cannot be acted upon. In his critique of Newton’s conceptions in “The Science of Mechanics” , Mach suggested a set of pioneering implicit ideas then addre ssed by A. Ein- stein as Mach’s Principle (MP) [2]. According to MP, every motion is only comprehensive as a relative motion, inertia is due to an inte raction with av- erage mass of the universe [3] and the distribution of matter in the universe determines the inertial frame at each point. There have been many attempts to ﬁnd Machianized reformulations of mechanics[4, 5, 6]. Ei nstein’s main aim in the general theory of relativity (GR) was to do this thr ough giving an equation for gravitation and inertia together. But it came o ut that his theory shows some non-Machian aspects and do not fulﬁll the MP. For i nstance it has solution for empty space. Also there are many alternativ e theories of gravitation motivated by Mach’s ideas [7, 8, 9]. Since in GR a s our stan- dard theory of gravitation we are still faced with unresolve d questions such as singularity problems and lack of well deﬁned source for in ertia, then it is reasonable to have more discussions about foundations. It s eems with closer scrutiny of Newton’s second law we may ﬁnd some insight. Actually in this work our aim is to present a simple method for Machian- ization of NM. We propose that inertial eﬀect is a mutual inte raction between two particles which in any non-rotating arbitrary referenc e frame Sis propor- tional to the diﬀerence between their accelerations and to t he inertial charges of each individual particles as follows /vectorFinertia =µ.c1.c2(/vector a1−/vector a2) (2) where /vector a1,/vector a2are accelerations of particles 1 and 2 with respect to S, their inertial charges are denoted by c1,c2respectively , and µis an inertial coupling constant. This can be easily extended to systems co nsisting of N particles. Again in any non-rotating arbitrary reference f rameSwe have /vectorFi=µ.ciN/summationdisplay j=1cj(/vector ai−/vector aj) (3) where /vectorFiis the applied force on particle i and the summation is done ov er all particles. 2In the real world the inertial charge and Newtonian inertial mass of a particle are related so that mi=µ.ciall/summationdisplay j=1cj (4) where summation is done over all particles in the universe. S ince local inho- mogenities have no observed eﬀects on the inertial mass then it is accepted that the inertial mass is determined by the global structure of the universe and the relation (4) for the inertial mass is in accordance wi th this general belief. This can be accounted as a simple formulation of Mach ’s idea about inertia. In terms of inertial mass , equation (3) can be rewri tten in the following form /vectorFi=mi /vector ai−all/summationtext j=1mj/vector aj all/summationtext j=1mj (5) These new forms of the second law i.e. equations (3) and (5) ar e invariant under transformation to a more general group of reference fr ames S′than Galilean ones which we may call as generalized Galilean tran sformations.   t′=t /vector a′=/vector a−/vectorb /vector u′=/vector u−/vectorbt−/vector v /vector x′=/vector x−1 2/vectorbt2−/vector vt+/vector x0(6) Here/vectorb,/vector vand/vector x0are the constant acceleration ,velocity and position of S′ with respect to Satt= 0 respectively. Within the set of reference frames S′with diﬀerent values of /vectorband/vector vthere is a unique subset call it S′′moving with acceleration /vectorb0 /vectorb0=all/summationtext j=1mj/vector aj all/summationtext j=1mj(7) with respect to S. InS′′the form of Newton’s second law of inertia is recovered, /vectorFi=m/vector a′′. Therefore, inertial frames are a unique set of frames which are moving with acceleration /vectorb0with respect to Swith/vector vand/vector x0be any arbitrary value. This again may be accounted for as a feasibl e formulation of Mach’s idea about inertial frames. Since /vectorb0is determined globally then local inhomogeneities have a negligible eﬀect on it and inertial f rames. 3It is evident that equations (3) and (5) also satisfy Newton’ s third law. For a two particle system we have /vectorF1=−/vectorF2=µ.c1.c2(/vector a1−/vector a2) (8) and for a system with N particles it makes all/summationdisplay j=1/vectorFi= 0 (9) So there is no need to introduce Newton’s third law as an extra principle. We can extend this model to Newton’s law of gravitation. Equi valence principle here means that the source of inertia and gravitat ion is the same. Then if we deﬁne the gravitational force between two particl es of inertial charges c1andc2as \|/vectorFG\|=µ2.c1.c2 \|/vector r12\|2(10) where \|/vector r12\|=\|/vector r1−/vector r2\|is the relative separation between particles 1 and 2. Then we can express gravitational constant Gin terms of inertial charges cis G= all/summationdisplay j=1cj −1 2 (11) which may be accounted for as another aspect of Machian impli cations that the so-called physical constants of nature (like G) are to be determined with some global features of the universe. Since the inertial mas s and the gravi- tational constant are ﬁnite quantities, this means that/parenleftigg all/summationtext j=1cj/parenrightigg is ﬁnite too, and the universe cannot be inﬁnitely extended. The Lagrangean formalism based on this model of inertial law is the same as the one for NM except that the kinematic energy of system T w hich is equal to/summationtext i1 2mivi2is replaced by T=/summationdisplay i1 2mivi2−[/summationtext imi/vector vi]2 2/summationtext imi(12) =1 4/summationdisplay i/summationdisplay jmimj(/vector vi−/vector vj)2 /summationtext jmj This is an invariant scalar. Then total energy of the system i .e. the sum of kinetic energy T and potential energy V(rij) , a function of relative separation rij=/vector ri−/vector rj, is invariant in all non-rotating reference frames. 4Remarks (i) - It may seem that choosing non-rotating frames is some ki nd of re- striction which reduces the generality of the chosen frames . This is however, not the case, since rotating frames with respect to the whole universe are distinguishable and can be ﬁxed. (ii) - Our results show that Gandmare not constants of nature but may change anytime the total inertial charge of the universe cha nges signiﬁ- cantly. This can happen in the early stage of evolution of the universe, i.e. in the epochs of pair production. (iii) - The concept of energy introduced with this theory is i ndependent of the reference frame. (iv) - There is no inertial strucure for empty space. These may show us how some thing should change in a modiﬁed the ory of relativity. References [1] Rindler, W. (1977). Essential Relativity , (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag. [2] Mach, Ernst (1960). The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development. LaSalle: Open Court. [3] Einstein, Albert (1912). ”Gibt es eine Gravitationswir kung, die der elektrodynamischen Induktionswirkung analog ist?” Vierteljahrsschrift f¨ ur gerichtliche Medizin und ¨ oﬀentliches Sanit¨ atswese n. 44: 37-40. [4] Barbour, Julian B. (1974). Relative-Distance Machian Theories ,Nature 249: 328-329. [5] Barbour, Julian B. , Bertotti, Bruno (1977). Gravity and Inertia in a Machian Framework , Nuovo Cimento 38B: 1-27. [6] Barbour, J. , Pﬁster, H. (Eds.)(1995). Mach’s Principle : From Newton’s Bucket to Quantum Gravity , Birkhauser, Boston. [7] Sciama, Dennis W. (1953). The Origin of Inertia , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 113:34-42. 5[8] Brans, C. , Dicke, R.H. (1961). Mach’s Principle and a Relativistic The- ory of Gravitation , Phy. rev. 124: 925-935. [9] Hoyle, F. , Narlikar, J.V. (1964). A New Theory of Gravitation , Proceed- ings of the Royal Society, Ser. A 282: 191-207. 6
arXiv:physics/0006022v1 [physics.optics] 8 Jun 2000Stable oscillating nonlinear beams in square-wave-biased -photorefractives Giorgio Maria Tosi-Beleﬃ, Marco Presi, Claudio Palma, Dani lo Boschi and Eugenio DelRe Fondazione Ugo Bordoni, Via B. Castiglione 59, 00142 Rome, I taly Istituto Nazionale Fisica della Materia, Unita’ di Roma 1, 0 0100 Rome, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita’ Roma Tre, 00146 Rome, I taly Aharon J. Agranat Applied Physics Department, Hebrew University of Jerusale m, Jerusalem 91904, Israel (February 2, 2008) We demonstrate experimentally that in a centrosymmetric pa raelectric non-stationary boundary conditions can dynamically halt the intrinsic instability of quasi-steady-state photorefractive self- trapping, driving beam evolution into a stable oscillating two-soliton-state conﬁguration. The propagation of light in a photorefractive crystal gives rise to intense beam self-action that, in its most generic manifestation, causes fanning and anisotropic scattering [1]. The application of an external bias ﬁeld to the crystal can drastically change this behaviour, and al- low spatial self-trapping and soliton formation: the non- diﬀracting propagation of micron-sized optical beams [2]. In a biased system this occurs only in a transient regime, for a ﬁnite time window, and the resulting nonlinear waves are called quasi-steady-state-solitons [3]. By in- creasing the natural dark conductivity, this regime can be made stable, giving rise to steady-state screening soli- tons [4]. In this paper we investigate, for the ﬁrst time, a fun- damentally diﬀerent stabilization process connected to beam behaviour in a non-stationary external bias ﬁeld [5]. In particular, we study beam evolution in the presence of an alternating ﬁeld in centrosymmetric potassium- lithium-tantalate-niobate (KLTN) [6], a material known to support a rich variety of nonlinear beam phenomena [7] [8] [9] [10]. Results indicate that, for appropriate conditions, the beam self-trapping process, that leads to transient quasi- steady-state solitons for stationary conditions, can be driven into a stable self-trapped regime, formed by an alternating oscillation between two beam trajectories, in theabsence of enhanced dark conductivity. This phe- nomenon, in our understanding, is made possible by the fact that single optical trajectories, corresponding to th e two alternate states of the bias ﬁeld, non-coincident due to asymmetric diﬀusion-seeded bending and electro-optic read-out eﬀects, engender the simultaneous formation, through the quadratic electro-optic response of the crys- tal in the paraelectric phase, of two trapping index pat- terns, that form two back-to-back specular double layers of charge that halt runaways charge buildup. Experiments are carried out in samples of zero-cut cen- trosymmetric photorefractive KLTN, a composite per- ovskite doped with Copper and Vanadium impurities, with a set-up that is similar to those generally used in photorefractive soliton studies [7] [8], apart from the ab-sence of background illumination and the use of an alter- nating external voltage source. The sample temperature is kept at a given value T by means of a stabilized current controlled Peltier-junction. A λ=514nm continuous-wave TEM 00beam, from an argon-ion laser, is ﬁrst expanded and then focused onto the input facet of the sample, and launched along the crystal principal axis z. Focusing is obtained either with a cylindrical y-oriented lens, giv- ing rise to a one-dimensional beam conﬁned in the x transverse direction, for investigation of slab-solitons , or a spherical lens for full two-transverse-dimensional (i.e . x and y) investigation of needle-solitons. The electrodes are deposited on the x facets and the source can provide a square-voltage wave-form of variable peak-to-peak am- plitude V sqand period T sq. Beam dynamics are observed by means of a top-view and a transverse CCD camera. The main qualitative phenomenology observed is con- tained in Fig.(1), where the two-branch oscillation along the x-axis is shown. The laser beam is focused by means of an f=150mm cylindrical lens onto the input facet of a 3.7(x)x4.7(y)x2.4(z)mm sample, giving rise to an approx- imately one-dimensional (transverse dimension x) funda- mental Gaussian beam diﬀracting in the x direction, as the beam evolves along z. The input beam has a full- width-half-maximum (FWHM) of ≃5µm, and diﬀracts to 44 µm after propagating 2.4 mm in the sample (n ≃ 2.4) (see Fig.(1(a)-(b)). The beam has a peak intensity Ip≃3kW/m2, whereas no background illumination is implemented. In these conditions, but with a station- ary bias, quasi-steady-state self-trapping is observed af - ter a response time τ1≃3min, for an external voltage on the x electrodes of V=380V. In the oscillating conﬁg- uration of Fig.(1(c)-(d)), the external square-wave bias voltage has a peak to peak amplitude V sq=760V with a period T sq= 10 s (i.e., T sq≪τ1), the crystal being kept at T=18◦C (thus having a relative dielectric constant of ǫr≈11·103). As the external oscillation occurs, the beam undergoes spatial conﬁnement in one direction towards one electrode (Fig.(1c)), and then in the other, towards the opposite electrode (along the transverse x direction) (Fig.(1d)), oscillating between two distinct optical tra- 1jectories. The remarkable result is that this stable oscil- lating regime, which has a buildup transient τ2≃15 min considerably longer than τ1, continues indeﬁnetly , and is thus a stable oscillation in which the beam is continuously conﬁned, but in twodistinct alternating trajectories. The switching time τsw≪Tsqis associated with the crystal charging time. Apart from this very short interval τsw, not of photorefractive nature, the beam is continuously trapped . The distance between the two trapped beams at the output is ∆x ≃30µm. FIG. 1. Stable two-state oscillation of a slab-soliton beam subject to a square-wave bias. (a) Normalized input inten- sity proﬁle; (b) Output intensity proﬁle after 2.4mm linear propagation in the crystal; (c-d) Output intensity self-tr apped proﬁles of the two alternating states. An analogous phenomenology is observed for two- dimensional diﬀracting beams, and is shown in Fig.(2), in a second 2.2(x)x2.2(y)x6.4(z)sample of KLTN, kept at T=26◦C (ǫr≈6.5·103). Note that the needle conﬁne- ment extends over approximately 25 diﬀraction lengths. As opposed to screening soliton phenomena, we found no strict existence condition associated with the electro- optic response (i.e., V sqand crystal T), much like stan- dard quasi-steady-state self-trapping experiments [3]. The only observable diﬀerence in the ﬁnal oscillating state that depends appreciably on changes in the electro- optic response is the divergence angle of the two trajecto- ries, that gives rise, at the output, to a diﬀerent value of ∆x. We found that a stronger static polarization induces a stronger divergence. On the other hand, we observed a distinct dependence of beam evolution on the time scales involved, suggest- ing that the main underlying mechanism is strongly con- nected to the temporal oscillations in the boundary con- ditions. We thus carried out experiments changing the nonlinear time constant, connected to beam peak inten- sity I p, keeping all other parameters unaltered. Thus, we essentially vary the ratio T sq/τ1, since τ1is approx- imately proportional to I p. For slow enough dynamics i.e., for T sq/τ1≪1, the steady oscillating state is al- waysreached (at least for the investigated cases), whereasfor very rapid dynamics, i.e., for beam intensities such that T sq/τ1≫1 , single branch evolution is allowed to reach quasi-steady-state destabilization and the steady oscillating situation is not observed. In this case, the beam undergoes a distinctive swinging evolution mim- icking the two-state self-trapping of the previous case, as shown in Fig.(3). During one ﬁeld oscillation, the beam ﬁrst undergoes self-trapping, deﬂected in one direction (Fig.(3b)), decays (see Fig.(3a)), diﬀracting in the for- ward z direction, and then forms a second transient soli- ton in the opposite direction (Fig.(3c)), decays again in the z direction, and so forth. Thus, in this case, no sta- bleself-trapped oscillating conﬁguration is reached, since most of the time the beam is diﬀracting (T sq≫τ1). Note that the swinging motion is a direct consequence of the residual charge displacement of the previous state, and is much more pronounced than single beam self-bending ob- served in stationary conditions (∆x ≃30µm as compared to ∆x≃5µm of conventional self-bending observed). FIG. 2. Stable two-state oscillation of a needle-soliton beam subject to a square-wave of peak to peak amplitude Vsq=700V, of period T sq=10s. (a) Input intensity 6 µm FWHM distribution; (b) Output intensity 150 µm distri- bution after 6.4mm linear propagation in the crystal; (c-d) Output intensity self-trapped proﬁles of the two alternati ng states. We shall limit our discussion to slab-solitons, since un- derstanding of even basic needle soliton phenomenology is still unclear [11]. Concerning the formation of the two- state oscillation, we note that, although in a purely drift- like conﬁguration free photoexcited charge under the in- ﬂuence of a zero average square-wave alternate ﬁeld E sq, withTsq≪τ1, cannot give rise to any space-charge sepa- ration, asymmetric charge diﬀusion components can seed two intensity distributions I +and I −, corresponding to the two alternate states of external ﬁeld, that separate during propagation along the z axis, and thus allows a non-zero photorefractive response [12]. The ﬁnal state is a product of beam charge separation during one electric ﬁeld polarity, combined with electro-holographic eﬀects during the opposite polarity phase [13]. 2FIG. 3. Soliton swinging: Slab-beam transient dynamics for aτ1≃2s and T sq=10s in a 6.4mm long sample of KLTN, with a V sq, sample T=27◦C. (a) Top view (y direction) of the diﬀracting beam, with a 6 µm input FWHM, and lin- ear diﬀracting 120 µm output; (b)-(c) Two opposite transient self-trapped states. To break down the process, consider the formation of a single quasi-steady-state soliton with a constant volt- age V=V +(equal to the positive value of the alternating ﬁeld in the oscillating case)(see Fig.(4a-b)). If we halt beam evolution (attenuating the propagating beam in- tensity) before the transient trapped regime has decayed (i.e., for t < τ1), and put V=0, we observe an increased beam diﬀraction at the output, a signature of the resid- ual defocusing pattern (Fig.(4c)). The diﬀraction is fur- thermore slightly asymmetric, as a consequence of the diﬀusion component in charge separation. If we invert the applied electric ﬁeld (i.e. V=V −≡-V+), the defo- cusing pattern is enhanced, and most of the light is di- verted to a limited region strongly shifted with respect to the input beam (Fig.(4d)). A wholly specular behaviour is observed when the quasi-steady-state soliton is orig- inally formed with a constant V=V −(Fig.(4e,f,g, and h)). In the actual alternating ﬁeld case, since we start from a zero charge separation, and do not allow the sys- tem to evolve, if not only partially, during each oscillatio n (Tsq≪τ1), the ﬁnal charge separation and index pattern will be a symmetric hybrid combination of the two self- trapped and two deﬂected beams (see Fig.(4b,d,f,and h)), whereas the actual beam trajectory will switch, following the oscillation of the external ﬁeld. Note that, during the entire oscillation, the beam continuously maintains its conﬁnement, apart from the small transient τsw. Concerning the stability of the nondiﬀracting pattern, in absence of artiﬁcial dark illumination we note that in our case charge separation is intrinsically symmetric. Mobile electrons are forced to drift towards the central region between the two trajectories, forming a potential barrier to further charge separation and saturation, eﬀec- tively freezing the space-charge structure. The switching , in this case, is only of electro-optic nature, and occurs as a consequence of the electro-holographic read-out of the asymmetric index components in the initial stages of propagation (where the two trajectories are superposed),after the space-charge ﬁeld has reached a steady-state. FIG. 4. Break-down of the two-state formation process. Output intensity distribution (conditions of Fig.(1)). (a ) Initial output diﬀraction for V=0; (b) Quasi-steady-state self-trapping for V=V +; (c) Read-out intensity for V=0 (after soliton formation); (d) Read-out intensity for V=V −; (e,f,g,h) specular results starting from V=V −. The work of E.D. and M.P. was carried out in the framework of an agreement between Fondazione Ugo Bor- doni and the Italian Communications Administration. Research carried out by A.J.A. is supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science of the State of Israel. We thank Luigi Piccari for useful discussions. [1] L. Solymar, D. J. Webb, and A. Grunnet-Jepsen, The physics and applications of photorefractive materials (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1996). [2] M. Segev and M. Stegeman, Phys. Today 51, 42 (1998); G.I. Stegeman and M. Segev, Science 286, 1518 (1999). [3] G.C. Duree, J.L. Shultz, G.J. Salamo, M. Segev, A. Yariv, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, E.J. Sharp, and R.R. Neurgaonkar, Phys.Rev.Lett. 71, 533 (1993). [4] M. Segev, G. Valley, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, and A. Yariv, Phys.Rev.Lett. 73, 3211 (1994); D.N. Christodoulides and M.I. Carvalho, J.Opt.Soc.Am.B 12, 1628 (1995). [5] In linear conﬁgurations see, e.g., A. Grunnet-Jepsen, C.H. Kwak, and L. Solymar, Opt.Lett. 19, 1299 (1994). [6] A.J. Agranat, R. Hofmeister, and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 17, 713 (1992). [7] E. DelRe, B. Crosignani, M. Tamburrini, M. Segev, M. Mitchell, E. Refaeli, and A.J. Agranat, Opt.Lett. 23, 421 (1998). [8] E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini, M. Segev, E. Refaeli, and A.J. Agranat, Appl.Phys.Lett. 73, 16 (1998). [9] B. Crosignani, A. Degasperis, E. DelRe, P. Di Porto, and A.J. Agranat, Phys.Rev.Lett. 82, 1664 (1999). [10] E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini, M. Segev, R. Della Pergola, and A.J. Agranat, Phys.Rev.Lett. 83, 1954 (1999). [11] S. Gatz and J. Herrmann, Opt.Lett. 23, 1176 (1998); M. Saﬀman, A.A. Zozulya, Opt.Lett. 23, 1579 (1998). [12] M. Carvalho, S. Singh, D. Christodoulides , Opt.Comm. 120, 311 (1995). [13] E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini and Aharon J. Agranat, Opt.Lett. 25, 963 (2000) 3
arXiv:physics/0006023v1 [physics.ed-ph] 9 Jun 2000Workshop Presentation and Hot Topics Alessandro B. Romeo Onsala Space Observatory Chalmers University of Technology SE-43992 Onsala, Sweden (romeo@oso.chalmers.se) ∗ Abstract The workshop ‘Astrophysical Dynamics 1999/2000’ followed a homonymous ad- vanced research course, and both activities were organized by me. In this opening paper of the proceedings book, I describe them and document t heirstrong impact on the academic life of the local institutions. 1 Introduction The advanced research course was held at Chalmers Universit y of Technology and G¨ ote- borg University in October–December 1999; it was open to gra duate students, senior researchers, and motivated under-graduate students with g ood background in physics and mathematics. The course covered several multi-discipl inary issues of modern research on astrophysical dynamics, and thus also of interest to phys icists, mathematicians and engineers. The major topic was gas dynamics, viewed in conte xt with stellar dynamics and plasma physics. The course was complemented by parallel seminars on hot topics given by experts in such ﬁelds, and open to a wide scientiﬁc au dience. In particular, I gave a friendly introduction to wavelets , which are becoming an increasingly powerful tool not only for processing signals and images but also for analysin g fractals and turbulence, and which promise to have important applications to dynamical m odelling of disc galaxies. The course is presented in more detail in Sect. 2. The basic re ference is Romeo (1999b); see also the references cited therein and in Sect. 2, and Rome o (1999a) for a discussion of my ideas about teaching (in a diﬀerent context). The workshop was held at Onsala Space Observatory on 12 and 13 January, and 1 March, 2000; it was open to a wide scientiﬁc audience. The wor kshop with published proceedings book was, as a matter of fact, the innovative form of exam that I proposed for the advanced research course. The contributions were re fereed and their quality is high on average, exceptionally high in a few cases. The works hop is presented in more detail in Sect. 3. ∗Astrophysical Dynamics 1999/2000, Alessandro B. Romeo (Ed .), Onsala Space Observatory, 2000. 1The advanced research course and the workshop all together p roduced great enthusi- asm in the students and welcomed the participation of a hundr ed diﬀerent people, which means an order of magnitude more than an average graduate course at Chalmers Univer- sity of Technology and G¨ oteborg University. What else shou ld I say? Enjoy reading the proceedings book! 2 The Advanced Research Course 2.1 Lectures 1. Basics about ﬂuids (2 hours). 2. The equations of motion (4 hours). 3. Simple applications (4 hours). 4. Instabilities (4 hours). 5. Turbulences and fractals (2 hours). 6. Astrophysical fractals: interstellar medium and galaxi es (1 hour). •References: Combes (1999b). 7. Which thermal physics for gravitationally unstable medi a? (1 hour). •References: Pfenniger (1998). 8. Shocks (4 hours). 9. Magnetic ﬁelds (4 hours). 10. Gas dynamics vs. stellar dynamics and plasma physics (2 h ours). References: Shu (1992), unless otherwise speciﬁed; see als o van Dyke (1982), Shore (1992), Dyson & Williams (1997) and Choudhuri (1998). 2.2 Exercises 1. Birth, life (and death?) of a galaxy: a step-by-step probl em (6 hours). References: Padmanabhan (1996); see also Binney & Tremaine (1987) and Binney & Merriﬁeld (1998). 2.3 Parallel Seminars on Hot Topics 1. ‘Wavelets: A Presentation for Scientists’ – Alessandro R omeo (2 hours). •Multimedia: computer-projector show using the Matlab Wave let Toolbox, run- ning on a high-performance Linux machine; public computer l ab. •References: Press et al. (1992), Vetterling et al. (1992), M isiti et al. (1997), Hubbard (1998), Mallat (1998), Bergh et al. (1999) and Wavel et Digest.2. ‘Black-Hole Accretion Discs’ – Marek Abramowicz (2 hours ). 3. ‘Wavelets at Work in Physics’ – Alessandro Romeo (2 hours) . •Multimedia: computer-projector show using the Matlab Wave let Toolbox, run- ning on a high-performance Linux machine; public computer l ab. •References: Bowman & Newell (1998), Fang & Thews (1998), Goe decker (1998) and van den Berg (1999). 4. ‘Small-Scale Structure and Dynamics in the Interstellar Medium’ – John Black (2 hours). 5. ‘Wavelets at Work in Astrophysics’ – Alessandro Romeo (2 h ours). •Photographs: http://www.mvd.chalmers.se/~pergus/alessandro/ . •Multimedia: computer-projector show using the Matlab Wave let Toolbox, run- ning on a high-performance Linux machine, and the documenta tion of the MR/1-MR/2 Software Packages; public computer lab. •References: Fang & Thews (1998), Starck et al. (1998) and van den Berg (1999). 6. ‘Magnetic Fields in Galaxies’ – Cathy Horellou (2 hours). 7. ‘Dynamical Modelling of Disc Galaxies: Multi-Scale Stru ctures’ – Alessandro Romeo (2 hours). •References: Romeo (1994), Friedli (1996), Zhang (1996), Ma sset & Tagger (1997), Romeo (1997, 1998a, b), Zhang (1998), Block & Puerar i (1999), Combes (1999a), Erwin & Sparke (1999), Friedli (1999), Martini & Po gge (1999), Shlos- man (1999), Zhang (1999), Combes (2000), Englmaier & Shlosm an (2000), Maciejewski & Sparke (2000) and Shlosman (2000). 3 The Workshop 1. ‘Turbulence and Fractal Analysis Using Wavelets’ – Micha el F¨ orsth (1.5 hours). •Proceedings: review paper. •Referees: J¨ oran Bergh, Cathy Horellou and Alessandro Rome o. 2. ‘Dark Matter and Cold Fractal Clouds’ – Achim Tappe (1.5 ho urs). •Proceedings: review paper. •Referees: John Black, Alessandro Romeo and Tommy Wiklind. 3. ‘Fractals and Large-Scale Structure of the Universe’ – ˇGirts Barinovs (1.5 hours). •Proceedings: paper. •Referees: Alessandro Romeo and Tommy Wiklind. 4. ‘Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in Accretion Discs’ – R im Turkmani (1.5 hours).•Proceedings: review paper. •Referees: Arto Heikkil¨ a, Alessandro Romeo and Ulf Torkels son. 5. ‘Galaxy Collisions’ – Nils Tarras-Wahlberg (1.5 hours). •Proceedings: abstract. •Referees: Alessandro Romeo. 6. ‘The Outﬂow-Disc Interaction in Young Stellar Objects’ – Michele Pestalozzi (1.5 hours). •Proceedings: review paper. •Referees: John Conway, Michael Olberg and Alessandro Romeo . 7. ‘Jets from Herbig-Haro Objects’ – Jiyune Yi (1.5 hours). •Proceedings: abstract. •Referees: Alessandro Romeo. 8. ‘Origin and Propagation of Extragalactic Jets’ – Alessan dro Laudati (1.5 hours). •Proceedings: abstract. •Referees: Alessandro Romeo. 9. ‘Why Are Evolved-Stellar Atmospheres Clumped?’ – Liz Hum phreys (cancelled). 10. ‘Ionization Fronts and Photo-Dissociation’ – Henrik Ol ofsson (1.5 hours). •Proceedings: review paper. •Referees: John Black, ˚Ake Hjalmarson and Alessandro Romeo. Acknowledgements I would very much like to thank the following people for their invaluable help: the speakers of the parallel seminars on hot topics, the contributors to t he workshop and the referees of the proceedings; Christer Andersson (guided visits), Pe r Gustafson (IT-project), Bert Hansson (transports), H˚ akan H˚ akansson (AV-service), Bi ¨ orn Nilsson and Michael Olberg (computers), Michele Pestalozzi and Achim Tappe (support f rom A to Z!). Last but not least, I acknowledge the ﬁnancial support of the Swedish Natural Science Research Council, of the local institutions and the further generous grants by the ‘Solveig och Karl G Eliassons Minnesfond’. References Bergh J., Ekstedt F., Lindberg M., 1999, Wavelets. Studentl itteratur, Lund Binney J., Merriﬁeld M., 1998, Galactic Astronomy. Princet on University Press, Prince- ton Binney J., Tremaine S., 1987, Galactic Dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (Errata in arXiv:astro-ph/9304010)Block D.L., Puerari I., 1999, A&A 342, 627 Bowman C., Newell A.C., 1998, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 289 Choudhuri A.R., 1998, The Physics of Fluids and Plasmas: An I ntroduction for Astro- physicists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Combes F., 1999a, ASP Conf. Ser. 187, 59 Combes F., 1999b, arXiv:astro-ph/9906477 Combes F., 2000, ASP Conf. Ser. 197, 15 Dyson J.E., Williams D.A., 1997, The Physics of the Interste llar Medium. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol Englmaier P., Shlosman I., 2000, ApJ 528, 677 Erwin P., Sparke L.S., 1999, ApJ 521, L37 Fang L.-Z., Thews R.L. (Eds.), 1998, Wavelets in Physics. Wo rld Scientiﬁc, Singapore Friedli D., 1996, ASP Conf. Ser. 91, 378 Friedli D., 1999, ASP Conf. Ser. 187, 88 Goedecker S., 1998, Wavelets and Their Application for the S olution of Partial Diﬀer- ential Equations in Physics. Presses Polytechniques et Uni versitaires Romandes, Lausanne Hubbard B.B., 1998, The World According to Wavelets: The Sto ry of a Mathematical Technique in the Making. Peters, Wellesley Maciejewski W., Sparke L.S., 2000, MNRAS 313, 745 Mallat S., 1998, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academ ic Press, San Diego Martini P., Pogge R.W., 1999, AJ 118, 2646 Masset F., Tagger M., 1997, A&A 322, 442 Matlab Wavelet Toolbox: http://www.mathworks.com/products/wavelet/ Misiti M., Misiti Y., Oppenheim G., Poggi J.-M., 1997, Wavel et Toolbox for Use with Matlab: User’s Guide. The MathWorks, Natick MR/1-MR/2 Software Packages: http://www.multiresolution.com/ Padmanabhan T., 1996, Cosmology and Astrophysics through P roblems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Pfenniger D., 1998, Mem. S.A.It. 69, 429 Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. , 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientiﬁc Computing. Cambridge Univers ity Press, Cambridge Romeo A.B., 1994, A&A 286, 799 Romeo A.B., 1997, A&A 324, 523 Romeo A.B., 1998a, A&A 335, 922 Romeo A.B., 1998b, N-Body Simulations of Disc Galaxies Can Shed Light on the Dark - Matter Problem. In: Salucci P. (ed.) Dark Matter. Studio Edi toriale Fiorentino, Firenze, p. 177 Romeo A.B., 1999a, arXiv:physics/9906028 Romeo A.B., 1999b, Astrophysical Dynamics. Course Notes, O nsala Space Observatory (unpublished) Shlosman I., 1999, ASP Conf. Ser. 187, 100 Shlosman I., 2000, ASP Conf. Ser. 197, 23Shore S.N., 1992, An Introduction to Astrophysical Hydrody namics. Academic Press, San Diego Shu F.H., 1992, The Physics of Astrophysics – Vol. II: Gas Dyn amics. University Science Books, Sausalito Starck J.-L., Murtagh F., Bijaoui A., 1998, Image Processin g and Data Analysis: The Multiscale Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambrid ge van den Berg J.C. (Ed.), 1999, Wavelets in Physics. Cambridg e University Press, Cam- bridge van Dyke M., 1982, An Album of Fluid Motion. Parabolic Press, Stanford Vetterling W.T., Teukolsky S.A., Press W.H., Flannery B.P. , 1992, Numerical Recipes Example Book (Fortran). Cambridge University Press, Cambr idge Wavelet Digest: http://www.wavelet.org/ Zhang X., 1996, ApJ 457, 125 Zhang X., 1998, ApJ 499, 93 Zhang X., 1999, ApJ 518, 613
arXiv:physics/0006024v1 [physics.pop-ph] 9 Jun 2000The Quest for the Neutrino Mass Spectrum H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, H. P¨ as 1. Introduction Recently the particle physics community was shocked with br eathtaking news from the neutrino sector: Neutrino oscillations have b een conﬁrmed ﬁnally in the Super-Kamiokande [1] experiment. Now for the ﬁ rst time, on- going and future experiments in neutrino oscillations (Sup er-Kamiokande, Borexino, SNO, MINOS, KAMLAND, MINIBOONE,...) and double b eta decay (Heidelberg–Moscow, GENIUS,...) together can aim to solve the neutrino mass puzzle. It was in 1930, when Wolfgang Pauli (ﬁg. 1) wrote his famous le tter adressed as Liebe radioaktive Damen und Herren (Dear radioactive Ladie s and Gentlemen) , where he informed the participants of a nuclear physics workshop in T¨ ubingen about his absence (he preferred to par ticipate in a dance party) and postulated the neutrino to solve the proble m of energy nonconservation in the nuclear beta decay. In 1956 the neutr ino was ob- served for the ﬁrst time by Clyde Cowan and Fred Reines in Los A lamos, who originally planned to explode a nuclear bomb for their ex periment [2]. Finally, two years ago, the Super-Kamiokande experime nt, a 50,000 ton water tank viewed by more than 11,000 photo multipliers 1 ,000 meter underground below a holy mountain in Japan, announced a sign iﬁcant sig- nal for neutrino oscillations and established a non-vanish ing mass of the neutrino as the ﬁrst experimental signal of physics beyond t he standard model. However, in spite of these successes, entering a new m illenium the neutrino is still the most mysterious of the known particles . Alternatingly compared with spaceships travelling through the universe, ghosts penetrat- ing solid rocks and vampires missing a mirror image [3], it st ill inspires the phantasy of hundreds of adventurous particle, nuclear and a stro physicists being motivated by the hope, the neutrino could act as a key to the old hu- man dream of a ﬁnal theory, describing all particles and forc es in a uniﬁed framework, and to a deeper understanding of the fate of the un iverse. The attributes, making the neutrino this kind of outlaw amon g the known particles, are the following: 1Figure 1 .The man who proposed it and an impression of its potential cosmological consequences: Wolfgang Pauli (nobel prize 19 45, left panel [4]) ﬁrst thought about a neutral light particle being emitt ed in nuclear beta decays. Clouds of interstellar gas (right panel [5]) act as a birthplace for new stars. Neutrinos may be important for the formation of st ructure in the early universe. •The neutrino seems to possess an at least million times small er mass than the lightest of the remaining particles, the electron. While in the standard model the neutrino was introduced as massless “by h and”, this feature is especially problematic in uniﬁed theories, where the common treatment of neutrinos and charged fermions in exten ded multiplets implies them to have (Dirac) mass terms of the sam e order of magnitude as the other fermions. •Among all fundamental fermions the neutrino is the only one b eing electrically uncharged. Thus the neutrino interacts a bill ion times less often than an electron and may penetrate the entire earth wit hout even be deviated. This is the reason why neutrinos, in spite o f their tiny masses, may be that abundant that they contribute subst antially to the mass of the universe, about twenty times more than the m ass of all visible stars in the sky, and may inﬂuence the evolutio n of the universe, e.g. the growth of structures, in a signiﬁcant way . The basis for an understanding of these features relates the m to each other and was proposed in 1933 by the Italian theoretician Et tore Majo- rana [6], one year before he dissappeared under mysterious c ircumstances. Majorana found out that neutrinos, due to their neutral char ge, can be identical with their antiparticles, triggered by a new, so- called Majorana 2mass term∗. In 1979 T. Yanagida and independently Murray Gell-Mann (nobel prize 1969), P. Ramond and R. Slansky found out that th ese ad- ditional Majorana mass terms may cancel almost totally the u sual Dirac mass terms in the so-called “see-saw mechanism” [7], yieldi ng a natural explanation of the tiny neutrino masses. This would require the existence of right-handed heavy neutrinos as they are naturally predi cted in “left- right-symmetric” uniﬁed models.†The exact value of the mass then is correlated with a higher energy scale predicted by the under lying uniﬁed gauge group, and oﬀers one of the rare possibilities to test t hese theories, since most of the predictions are observable only at very hig h energies, which are lying beyond the reach of present and future accele rators (see ﬁg. 2). The question to experimentalists thus remains: What is the mass of the neutrino? The following review will outline the way to answer this question, concentrating on two experimental approaches, y ielding the com- plementary pieces to solve the puzzle: Only bothneutrino oscillations and neutrinoless double beta decay together could solve this absolute neutrino mass problem. 2. Neutrino oscillations The fact that neutrinos are massive has ﬁnally been establis hed by neutrino oscillation experiments. Neutrino oscillations are a quan tum mechanical process based on mixing between the three neutrino ﬂavors, w hich is possi- ble if the ﬂavor (interaction) eigenstates ναdo not coincide with the mass eigenstates νi. The ﬂavor eigenstates are thus given by a superposition of the mass eigenstates: να=3/summationdisplay i=1Uαiνi (1) In that case a neutrino, which is emitted as a ﬂavor eigenstat eναin a weak reaction, propagates as a superposition of the three mass ei genstates. If these mass eigenstates are non-degenerate, they travel wit h diﬀerent veloc- ities and the composition in eq. (1) is getting out of phase. W ith a proba- bility, which is a function of the mass squared diﬀerences ∆ m2=m2 i−m2 j and the mixing Uαi, after a certain distance the neutrino interacts as a diﬀerent mass eigenstate νβ/negationslash=α(see ﬁg. 3). Obviously neutrino oscillation experiments cannot give any information about the absolute mass scale in ∗In fact also pure usual “Dirac” mass terms for the neutrino ar e possible but are disfavored in most fundamental theories. †Alternative mechanisms motivate neutrino masses at the wea k scale, a famous example is R-parity violating supersymmetry, see e.g. [8], where neutrino masses pro- vide a window into deep relations of particles and forces. Al so gravity induced non- renormalizable mass terms can play a role in string-motivat ed scenarios, see e.g. [9]. 3m <0.2 eVνCMB (MAP&PLANCK) Neutrino MassLHC Range m <0.001 eVν Figure 2 .The light neutrino mass can be related to a corresponding lar ge mass scale in uniﬁed theories, e.g. in the see-saw mechanism . This way the hunt for neutrino masses oﬀers a unique possibility to ac cess physics at energy scales beyond the reach of running and future accel erators, which has been realized only shortly after the big bang. A neutrino mass of 0.1 eV - 0.001 eV corresponds, via the mass of its heavy right-han ded partner, to energies of 1010GeV or more, tiny fractions of a second after the big bang (background from [10]). 4ν νν eWµe W--+- 1 2µ ν-ν- ν-- 2ν- 0νn n2 1 n2Me me ne -e 1 Figure 3 .Schematic representation of the two complementary process es needed to solve the neutrino mass puzzle, neutrino oscillat ions and neutri- noless double beta decay. the neutrino sector, but yield informations about mass (squ ared) diﬀer- ences, only. Since the probability oscillates with the prop agation distance, this phenomenon, which was predicted by Bruno Pontecorvo, a fter he dis- appeared in 1950 from England and later showed up again in Rus sia, is called neutrino oscillations [11]. Up to now, hints for neutrino oscillations have been observe d in solar and atmospheric neutrinos as well as the accelerator experi ment LSND (for an overview see ﬁg. 4).‡ •A deﬁcit of the number of solar neutrinos [12] being expected has been conﬁrmed in many experiments [13] after the pioneering Chlor experiment [14] of Ray Davis in the Homestake mine. The oscil lation mechanism of the solar νein (as normally assumed) νµ§may be in- duced via two diﬀerent mechanisms. The usual neutrino oscil lation mechanism requires maximal mixing and suﬀers from the fact, that for this case the distance earth-sun has to be ﬁnetuned (vacu um os- cillations). An alternative solution has been suggested by works of S. Mikheyev, Alexei Smirnov and L. Wolfenstein [15]: Resona nt con- versions, which are triggered by matter eﬀects in the solar i nterior implying a level crossing of mass eigenstates, can cause the neutrino deﬁcit. In this case both small as well as large mixing are all owed. The diﬀerent solutions of the solar neutrino experiments co rrespond to diﬀerent combinations of mass squared diﬀerences ∆ m2 12and mix- ing matrix elements U2 12. They will be tested by ongoing and future experiments such as Super-Kamiokande, SNO and BOREXINO [18 ] in the next years¶. Vacuum oscillations should lead to seasonal variations, the small mixing MSW solutions should imply dis tortions ‡It should be stressed that besides neutrino oscillations al so new interactions beyond the standard model may provide solutions to some of the neutr ino anomalies, see [17] §An alternative would be a fourth sterile νs, see section 7 ¶If one allows for larger conﬁdence belts a third MSW “LOW” sol ution appears, which can be tested via its strong day-night eﬀect at low neut rino energies, observable at BOREXINO, LENS and the double beta and dark matter detecto r GENIUS (see below) [19]. 5GENIUS 1 t VACGENIUS 10 t Figure 4 .Summary of neutrino anomalies. The solar neutrino deﬁcit ca n be solved within the light blue regions of the small mixing an d large mixing MSW oscillations, and the vacuum oscillations (at ∆m2∼10−9−10−10 eV2, not shown in the ﬁgure). Only the large MSW solution is direc tly testable by KAMLAND. In the atmospheric favored region (lig ht green) νµ−νeoscillations are excluded by CHOOZ. The K2K and MINOS exper- iments will test for νµ→ντoscillations. The favored region of LSND is shown in light blue and can be tested in part by KARMEN and in to tal by MINIBOONE. Also shown is the sensitivity of GENIUS 1 ton and G ENIUS 10 t or comparable double beta decay projects to νe→νµ,τ,soscillations. The lines correspond to (from above) mνe/mνµ,τ,s=∞,0.01,0.1,0.5(back- ground from [27]). 6of the energy spectrum and the large mixing angle solution sh ould show a small spectral distortion, a day-night eﬀect of the to tal rate and a disappearance signal in the long baseline reactor expe riment KAMLAND [21] just under construction. •A similar eﬀect has been observed in atmospheric neutrinos [ 20], which stem from the decay of the pions produced from cosmic ra y interactions in the upper atmosphere and the following-up d ecays. Here Super-Kamiokande obtained a high precision result of a deﬁcit of muon neutrinos compared to electron neutrinos. Even more con- vincing is the distortion observed for the zenith angle depe ndence of the muon neutrino ﬂux, which provides a strong hint for νµ→ντ oscillations with maximal mixing and information about ∆ m2 23and U2 23[1]. Future long baseline experiments, K2K (already runnin g), MINOS, and CERN-Gran Sasso [21], looking for oscillations i n ac- celerator produced neutrino beams over distances of severa l hundred kilometers will provide a check of this result by directly lo oking for ντ appearance and have the possibility to search for small cont ributions ofνe→ντoscillations. •Also an accelerator experiment, LSND, has reported evidenc e for νe−νµneutrino oscillations. However, this evidence is generall y understood as the most ambiguous. The KARMEN experiment has excluded a large part of the favored region of LSND. Since onl y two experimental evidences may be ﬁtted with only three neutrin os. the LSND result would require the existence of a fourth, sterile (i.e. not weakly interacting) neutrino (see section 7). A decisive te st will be obtained from the MINIBOONE experiment [16]. 3. Neutrinoless double beta decay Double beta decay (0 νββ) corresponds to two single beta decays occurring in one nucleus and converts a nucleus (Z,A) into a nucleus (Z+ 2,A) (see ﬁg. 3). While the standard model (SM) allowed process emitti ng two antineutrinos A ZX→A Z+2X+ 2e−+ 2νe (2) is the rarest process observed in nature with half lives in th e region of 1021−24years, more interesting is the search for the lepton number v iolating and thus SM forbidden neutrinoless mode, A ZX→A Z+2X+ 2e−(3) which has been proposed by W.H. Furry in 1939 [22]. In this cas e the neu- trino is exchanged between the vertices (see ﬁg. 3), a proces s being only 7allowed if the intermediate neutrino has a Majorana mass. Ne utrinoless double beta decay, when observed, also does not measure dire ctly the neu- trino mass. Since the neutrino in the propagator is only virt ual, it does not have a deﬁnite mass. Propagating in the nucleus is the ﬂavor e igenstate with the so-called eﬀective neutrino Majorana mass /angbracketleftm/angbracketright=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/summationdisplay j\|Uej\|2eiφjmj/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle, (4) which is a function of the mixing angles Uej, complex phases φj, which allow for cancellations of the entering masses, and the neutrino m ass eigenvalues. This quantity has exciting connections to the observables i n neutrino oscil- lation experiments. The most stringent limit on this quanti ty,/angbracketleftm/angbracketright<0.35 eV, is obtained by the Heidelberg–Moscow experiment [23], w hich was ini- tiated by one of the authors [24] and is running since 10 years in the Gran Sasso underground laboratory in Italy. An impressive break through to 10−2−10−3eV could be obtained realizing the GENIUS project proposed in 1997 [25], a further proposal of H.V. Klapdor-Kleingroth aus, operating 1-10 tons of enriched Germanium directly in a tank of 12 m diam eter and height ﬁlled with liquid nitrogen. How are the results in double beta decay and neutrino oscilla tions re- lated? In a recent work [26] the authors of this article in col laboration with Alexei Smirnov from the ICTP Trieste were studying the r elations of the neutrino oscillation parameters and the eﬀective Maj orana mass in the several possible neutrino mass scenarios and settled th e conditions un- der which the neutrino mass spectrum can be reconstructed wi th future projects (see ﬁg. 5). In the following we will concentrate on three extreme cases as examples, the hierarchical spectrum, the degenera te scheme and the inverse hierarchical scheme. 4. Hierarchical schemes Hierarchical spectra (ﬁg. 6) m1≪m2≪m3 (5) can be motivated by analogies with the quark sector and the si mplest see- saw models. In these models the contribution of m1to the double beta decay observable /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightis small. The main contribution is obtained from m2 orm3, depending on the solution of the solar neutrino deﬁcit. If the small mixing angle solution is realized in solar neutr inos (i.e. small νe−νµmixing), the contribution of m2is small due to the small admixture Ue2. The same is true for vacuum oscillations, where Ue2is maximal but 8Steel-vessel 12 mLiquid Nitrogen IsolationGe-DetectorsClean-RoomData-acquisition Figure 5 .Schematic views of three experiments which will provide imp or- tant complementary pieces of information about the neutrin o mass. The Super-Kamiokande neutrino oscillation experiment, the GE NIUS double beta decay project (successor of the Heidelberg-Moscow exp eriment) and the Planck cosmic microwave satellite [28]. 9-510-410-3100 10-1 10-2νe νµ ντ /0/0/0 /1/1/1/0/0/0 /1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0 /1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 10/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1atm/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/1/0/1/0/1 /0/0/1/1/0/0/1/1/0/0/1/1/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1m, eV ν ν ν1 2 3νsolν Figure 6 .Neutrino masses and mixings in the scheme with mass hierar- chy, shown is the example of small solar neutrino mixing. Col oured bars correspond to ﬂavor admixtures in the mass eigenstates ν1,ν2,ν3. The quantity /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightis determined by the dark blue bars denoting the admixture of the electron neutrino Uei. sin22θ∆m2 [eV] 10-310-2 10-210-11CHOOZ KAMLAND <m>=0.005 eV K2K MINOS <m>=0.001 eV Figure 7 .Double beta decay observable /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightand oscillation parameters: The case of hierarchical schemes with either the MSW small mixin g solution or vacuum solution. Shown is the dominant contribution of the t hird state to /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightwhich is constrained by the CHOOZ experiment, excluding the region to the upper right. Further informations can be obtained fro m the long baseline project MINOS and future double beta decay experim ents [26]. the mass of the second state is tiny. In these cases the main co ntribution to /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightcomes from m3. The contribution of the latter is shown in ﬁg. 7. Here lines of constant /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightare shown as functions of the oscillation parameters 10)m∆2 0.0052(eV 0.002<m>=0.005 <m>=0.01 <m>=0.001 sin22θMSW LMA 0.2000.1800.1600.1400.1200.1000.0800.0600.0400.0300.0200.0150.010 Figure 8 .Double beta decay oberservable /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightand oscillation parame- ters: The case for the MSW large mixing solution of the solar n eutrino deﬁcit, where the dominant contribution to /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightcomes from the second state. Shown are lines of constant /angbracketleftm/angbracketright(diagonal) and constant day-night asymmetry (almost horizontal) [26]. The closed line shows t he region al- lowed by present solar neutrino experiments. Complementar y informations can be obtained from double beta decay and the search for a day -night eﬀect in future solar neutrino experiments. ∆m2 13andU13, parametrized by sin22θ13. The shaded areas show the mass m3≃/radicalbig ∆m2 13favored by atmospheric neutrinos with the horizontal line indicating the best ﬁt value. The region to the upper right is excluded by the nuclear reactor experiment CHOOZ [29], implying /angbracketleftm/angbracketright<2·10−3 eV in the range favored by atmospheric neutrinos. Obviously in this case only the 10 ton GENIUS experiment could observe a positive 0 νββdecay signal. A coincidence of such a measurement with a signal of νe→ντ oscillations at MINOS and a conﬁrmation of solar vacuum or sm all mixing MSW oscillations by solar neutrino experiments would be a st rong hint for this scheme. If the large mixing solution of the solar neutrino deﬁcit is r ealized, the contribution of m2becomes large due to the almost maximal Ue2, now. Fig. 8 shows values of /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightin the range of the large mixing angle solution (closed line). The almost horizontal lines correspond to co nstant day-night 111 100 10-1 10-2νsolνatm νe /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1ν10 µ 3/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1ντ/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/0/1/0/1/0/1 /0/0/1/1/0/0/1/1/0/0/1/1m, eV ν ν ν1 2 Figure 9 .Neutrino masses and mixings in the degenerate scheme, here t he example with large solar neutrino mixing. asymmetries. A coincident measurement of /angbracketleftm/angbracketright ≃10−3eV, a day-night asymmetry of 0.07 at future oscillation experiments and a co nﬁrmation of the large mixing angle solution by KAMLAND would identify a s ingle point in the large mixing angle MSW solution (in this example near t he present best-ﬁt point) and provide a strong hint for this scheme. 5. Degenerate schemes Degenerate schemes (ﬁg. 9) m1≃m2≃m3≃m0 (6) require a more general (and more complicated) form of the see -saw mech- anism [30]. One of their motivations is also, that a large ove rall mass scale allows neutrinos to be cosmologically signiﬁcant. Neutrin os with an overall mass scale of a few eV could play an important role as “hot dark mat- ter” component of the universe. When structures were formed in the early universe, overdense regions of (cold) dark matter provide t he seeds of the large scale structure, which later formed galaxies and clus ters. A small “hot” (relativistic) component could prevent an overprodu ction of struc- ture at small scales. Since structures redshift photons, th is should imply also imprints on the cosmic microwave background (CMB), whi ch could be measured by the future satellite experiments MAP and Planck [31]. In degenerate schemes the mass diﬀerences are not signiﬁcan t. Since the contribution of m3is strongly bounded by CHOOZ again, the main contributions to /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightcome from m1andm2. The relative contributions of these states depend on their admixture of the electron ﬂav or, which is determined by the solution of the solar neutrino deﬁcit. 122θPLANCKMAP 23 sinν(eV)HDM CHDM CHDMh=0.65 h=0.5Ω =0.2ν Ω =0.2ν CHDM Ω =0.5µ <m>=0.1 eV<m>=0.2 eV <m>=0.01 eV<m>=0.05 eVVacuum oscillationsMSW LMAΛm0 Figure 10 .Double beta decay oberservable /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightand oscillations parameters: The case for degenerate neutrinos. Plotted on the axes are th e overall scale of neutrino masses m0and the mixing sin22θ12. Allowed values for /angbracketleftm/angbracketright for a given m0correspond to the regions between m0and the correspond- ing curved line. Also shown are informations which could be o btained from cosmological ﬁts (see text) and the expected sensitivity of the satellite ex- periments MAP and Planck. A value of /angbracketleftm/angbracketright= 0.1eV in the case of small solar neutrino mixing would be in the range to be explored by M AP and Planck [26]. In ﬁg. 10 lines of constant double beta decay observables (so lid curved lines) are shown together with information from cosmologic al observations about the overall mass scale (horizontal lines). Shown are b est ﬁts to the CMB and the large scale structure of Galaxy surveys in diﬀere nt cosmolog- ical models as well as the sensitivity of MAP and Planck. E.g. , a ΛCHDM model with a total Ω m= 0.5 of both cold and hot dark matter as well as a cosmological constant, and a Hubble constant of h= 0.6 would imply an overall mass scale of about 0.5 eV. However, the contributio ns of diﬀerent mass eigenstates are in the same order of magnitude and may ca ncel, now. Assuming a mixing corresponding to the best ﬁt of solar large mixing MSW or vacuum oscillations this yields /angbracketleftm/angbracketright= 0.2−0.5 eV, just in the range of the recent half life limit of the Heidelberg–Moscow experiment . If even larger mixing turns out to be realized in the solution of the solar ne utrino deﬁcit, 13νatmνsolνe /0/0/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/1/1 νµ /0/0/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/1/1 ντ/0/0/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/1/1/0/1/0/1 -2/0/1 /0/0/1/1/0/0/1/1/0/0/1/1m, eV ν ν ν1 2 3101 100 10-1 10 10-3 10-4 Figure 11 .Neutrino masses and mixings in the scheme with inverse hier- archy. Shown is the example with large solar neutrino mixing . this allows for a larger cancellation. A coincidence of the a bsolute mass scale reconstructed from double beta decay and neutrino osc illations with a direct measurement of the neutrino mass in tritium beta dec ay spectra or its derivation from cosmological parameters determined from the CMB in the satellite experiments MAP and Planck would prove this scheme to be realized in nature. To establish this triple evidence how ever is diﬃcult due to the restricted sensitivity of the latter approaches. Future tritium experiments aim at a sensitivity down to O(0.1 eV) and MAP and Planck have been estimated to be sensitive to/summationtextmν= 0.5−0.25 eV. Thus for neutrino mass scales below m0<0.1 eV only a range for the absolute mass scale can be ﬁxed by solar neutrino experiments and double be ta decay. 6. Inverse Hierarchy A further possibility is an inverse hierarchical spectrum ( ﬁg. 11) m3≃m2≫m1 (7) where the heaviest state with mass m3is mainly the electron neutrino, now. Its mass is mainly determined by the atmospheric neutrinos, m3≃ ∆m23. Thus for the case of the small mixing angle solution one gets a unique prediction of /angbracketleftm/angbracketright= (5−8)·10−2eV, which could be tested by the 1 ton version of GENIUS. For the vacuum or large mixing MSW sol ution cancellations of the two heavy states become possible and /angbracketleftm/angbracketright<8·10−2 eV. A test of the inverse hierarchy is possible in matter eﬀec ts of neutrino oscillations. For this case the MSW level crossing happens f or antiparti- cles rather than for particles. Eﬀects could be observable i n long baseline experiments and in the neutrino spectra of supernovae [32]. 14e /0/0/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/1/1 νµ /0/0/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/1/1 ντ/0/0/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/1/1νs ν3νatm νν solLSND /0/1/0/1/0/1/0/1m, eV ν2 1101 100 10-1 10 10-3 10-4-2 ν4ν Figure 12 .Neutrino masses and mixings in the four neutrino scheme, sho wn is the example with small solar neutrino mixing. 7. Four neutrinos Sterile neutrinos, which do not couple to the weak interacti ons, can easily be motivated in superstring inspired models: multidimensi onal candidates for a ﬁnal “Theory of Everything”, in which the fundamental c onstituents of matter have a string rather than a particle character. Suc h theories could accomodate for additional neutrinos in diﬀerent ways . Examples are extended gauge groups, fermions living in extra (compactiﬁ ed) dimensions as well as a mirror world, which contains a complete duplicat e of matter and forces building the universe, interacting only via grav ity. In the latter case/angbracketleftm/angbracketright= 0.002 eV is predicted [33]. If the four neutrinos are arranged as two pairs of degenerate states (mainly νe−νsfor solar and νµ−ντfor atmospheric neutrinos) separated by a LSND gap, all three neutrino anomalies can be solved and t he two heavy states can account for the hot dark matter. The main con tribution to /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightcomes from the heavy states, then, and can be derived from the LSND result. Depending on the phase of these two contributions /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightcan be as large as O(10−3eV). A strong hint for the scheme would be a coincidence of the ∆ m2favored in LSND and possibly MINIBOONE, cosmological observations and double beta decay, together with the disco very of sterile neutrinos in solar neutrino oscillations by SNO. 8. Summary The recent years brought exciting developments in neutrino physics. Neu- trino oscillations have ﬁnally been conﬁrmed in atmospheri c neutrinos and at the same time double beta decay experiments realized for t he ﬁrst time a sensitivity, leading to strong implications on the neutri no mass spectrum and cosmological parameters. After this particle physics n ow seems to enter its “neutrino epoche”: The neutrino mass spectrum and its ab solute mass 15scale oﬀer unique possibilities to provide crucial informa tion for cosmology and theories beyond the standard model. Only both neutrino o scillations and neutrinoless double beta decay together have the chance to solve this neutrino mass problem (see also, e.g. [34]) and to set the abs olute scale in the neutrino sector: If the solution of the solar neutrino deﬁcit and the character of hierarchy (direct or inverse) is determined in neutrino oscilla- tion experiments, the following informations will be obtai ned from a future double beta decay project: For the case of direct/normal hierarchy, a conﬁrmation of th e small mixing MSW solution would mean: If double beta decay would be measured with/angbracketleftm/angbracketright>0.1 eV this would establish a degenerate spectrum with a ﬁxed mass scale. If /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightis measured in the range (0 .5−3)·10−2eV a partially degenerate spectrum, m1≃m2≪m3, with ﬁxed mass scale is realized in nature. For /angbracketleftm/angbracketright<2·10−3eV a hierarchical spectrum exists in nature. For the large mixing MSW solution a value of /angbracketleftm/angbracketright>3·10−2eV implies a degenerate spectrum with a region for the mass scale determ ined by the solar mixing angle. For /angbracketleftm/angbracketright<2·10−2eV a partially degenerate or hierarchical spectrum is realized in nature and a region for the mass scale is set by the solar mixing angle. If /angbracketleftm/angbracketright<2·10−3eV is measured the spectrum is hierarchical. If vacuum oscillations are the co rrect solution for the solar neutrino deﬁcit a value of /angbracketleftm/angbracketright>3·10−2eV implies degeneracy, /angbracketleftm/angbracketright>2·10−3eV partial degeneracy and /angbracketleftm/angbracketright<2·10−3eV hierarchy, but no information about the absolute mass scale is obtained. For the case of inverse hierarchy the situation is more predi ctive. For the small mixing angle MSW solution /angbracketleftm/angbracketright ≡(5−8)·10−2eV is expected. For large mixing angle MSW or vacuum oscillations one awaits /angbracketleftm/angbracketright<8·10−2, above this value the scheme approaches the degenerate case. In four neutrino schemes /angbracketleftm/angbracketrightcan be as large as O(10−3) eV. A conin- cidence of a double beta decay signal with the ∆ m2favored in LSND and possibly in MINIBOONE, an imprint of neutrinos as hot dark ma tter in the CMB as well as the discovery of sterile neutrinos in SNO wo uld prove the scheme and ﬁx the mass scale. This outcome will be a large step both towards the understand ing of the evolution of the universe and towards the dream of a uniﬁe d theoretical description of nature. We are entering an exciting decade! References [1] Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collab.) Phys. Rev. L ett. 81 (1998) 1562 [2] F. Reines, C. Cowan, Phys. Rev. 113 (1959) 273 [3] C. Sutton, Spaceship Neutrino, Cambridge University Pr ess 1992 16[4] http://www.lapp.in2p3.fr [5] http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov [6] E. Majorana, Nuovo Cim. 14 (1937) 171 [7] T. Yanagida, in Proc. Workshop on Uniﬁed Theory and Baryon number in the Universe , Eds. O. Sawada, A. Sugamoto, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan (1979) 95; M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, R. Slansky, in Supergravity Eds. P. Nieuwenhuizen, D.Z. Freedman, (North Holland 1979) 315 [8] M.A. Diaz, J.C. Romao, J.W.F. Valle, Nucl. Phys. B 524 (19 98) 23-40; G. Bhattacharyya, H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, H. P¨ as, Ph ys. Lett. B 463 (1999) 77 [9] M. Cvetic, P. Langacker, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) R2759 [10] http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk [11] B. Pontecorvo, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 33 (1957) 549; Z. Maki, M. Nakagava, S. Sakata, Progr. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962 ) 870 [12] M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, P.C. de Holanda, C. Pena-Garay, J.W.F. Valle, hep-ph/9906469 [13] Y. Fukuda et al. (Kamiokande Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1683; J. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett 77 (19 96) 4708; P. Anselmann et al. (GALLEX Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 342 (1995 440); Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collab.), Phys. Rev. Let t. 81 (1998) 1158 [14] R. Davis Jr., D.S. Harmer, K.C. Hoﬀman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20 (1968) 1205 [15] L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2369; S.P. Mikhey ev, A. Yu. Smirnov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42 (1985) 913 [16] C. Athanossopoulos et al. (LSND Collab.), Phys. Rev. Le tt. 81 (1998) 1774; K. Eitel, New Jour. Phys. 2 (2000) 1 [17] S. Bergmann, H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, H. P¨ as, hep -ph/0004048; S. Bergmann, A. Kagan, Nucl. Phys. B 538 (1999) 368; M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3202; S. Bergmann, Nucl. Phys. B 515 (1998) 363; S. Bergmann, M.M. Guzzo, P.C. de Holanda, H. Nunokawa and P.I . Krastev, hep-ph/0004049; S. Bergmann, Y. Grossman and D.M. Pierce, Phys. Rev. D 61 (200 0) 53005; S. Bergmann and Y. Grossman, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 093005. [18] SNO Collab., nucl-ex/9910016 C. Arpesella et al. (Bore xino Collab.): Borexino proposal, INFN preprint [19] LENS Collab., Letter of Intent, INFN-LNGS 1999 L. Baudis, H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, Eur. J. Phys. A 5 (19 99) 414 [20] N. Fornengo, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, J.W.F. Valle, hep- ph/0002147 [21] K. Zuber, hep-ex/9810022 17[22] W.H. Furry, Phys. Rev. 56 (1939) 1184 [23] Heidelberg–Moscow Collab. (L. Baudis et al.), Phys. Re v. Lett. 83 (1999) 41 and preprint, June 2000 [24] H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, Heidelberg-Moscow prop osal, MPI H V17 1987; H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, Springer Tracts in Mode rn Physics, 163 (2000) 2000 [25] H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, in Beyond the Desert ’97 – Accelerator and Non-Accelerator Approaches (Eds. H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, H. P¨ as), Proc. Int. Workshop on Particle Physics beyond the Standard Model, Castle Ringberg, June 8-14, 1997, IOP Publ., Bristol , Philadel- phia, p. 485 and Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13 (1998) 3953; J. Hellmig, H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, Z. Phys. A 359 (199 7) 351; H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, M. Hirsch, Z. Phys. A 359 (1997 ) 361; H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, J. Hellmig, M. Hirsch, J. Phys . G 24 (1998) 483; H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, L. Baudis, G. Heusser, B. Majo rovits, H. P¨ as, hep-ph/9910205 [26] H.V. Klapdor–Kleingrothaus, H. P¨ as, A.Yu. Smirnov, h ep-ph/0003219 [27] L. Di Lella, hep-ex/9912010 [28] http://www.phys.washington.edu/ ∼superk [25] http://astro.estec.esa.nl [29] M. Apollonio et al. (CHOOZ collab.), Phys. Lett. B 466 (1 999) 415-430 [30] R.N. Mohapatra, G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (198 0) 912 R.N. Mohapatra, hep-ph/9702229, Proc. Neutrino 1996, Hels inki [31] R.E. Lopez, astro-ph/9909414; E. Gawiser, J. Silk, Science 280 (1998) 1405-1411; J.R. Primack, M.A.K. Gross, astro-ph/9810204, Proc. of the Xth Re- contres de Blois “The birth of galaxies”, June 28 - July 4 1998 ; D.J. Eisenstein, W. Hu, M. Tegmark astro-ph/9807130, Submi tted to ApJ. [32] A.S. Dighe, A.Yu. Smirnov, hep-ph/9907423 [33] R.N. Mohapatra, hep-ph/9903261 R.N. Mohapatra, A. Perez-Lorenzana, hep-ph/9910474 R.N. Mohapatra, in Proc. Erice school on neutrinos 1997, Pro gr. Part. Nucl. Phys. 40 1998 [34] S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, W. Grimus, B. Kayser, S.T. Petc ov, Phys.Lett. B465 (1999) 193-202 V. Barger, K. Whisnant, Phys. Lett. B 456 (1999) 194-200 F. Vissani, JHEP 9906 (1999) 022 18
arXiv:physics/0006025v1 [physics.atom-ph] 9 Jun 2000Pair production and electron capture in relativistic heavy -ion collisions R.J.S. Lee, J.V. Mullan, J.F. McCann and D.S.F. Crothers Department of Applied Mathematics &Theoretical Physics, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK. (February 2, 2008) Results are presented for simulations of electron-positro n pair production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions lead ing to electron capture and positron ejection. We apply a two-cent er relativistic continuum distorted-wave model to represent the electron/positron dynamics during the collision process. The results are compared with experimental cross-section data for La57+and Au79+impact on Gold, Silver and Copper targets. The theory is in very good agreement with experiment, veri- fying the result that the process increases in importance wi th both collision energy and target atomic number, and improve s upon previous simulations of this process. Early theoretical work on the production of an e−/e+ pair through heavy-ion collisions considered only the cre- ation of the electron and positron in the continuum. However capture by pair production (CPP), in which the electron is formed in a bound state of one or other ion, becomes a signiﬁcant process at highly relativistic ener- gies. Remarkably this process was suﬃciently important to enable the synthesis of atomic antihydrogen using the low-energy antiproton ring at CERN. A beam of fast an- tiprotons impacting on a xenon gas target [1] led to pair production with positron capture. Theory had predicted [2,3] that cross sections for CPP would increase with en- ergy, and indeed this has been veriﬁed experimentally [4–6] . In fact, this process eventually becomes the domi- nant mechanism for charge exchange in highly-relativistic atomic collisions [6]. As well as being an interesting area of study in its own right, this process has important ap- plications in the physics of heavy ion colliders such as the large-hadron collider (LHC) and the relativistic heavy- ion collider (RHIC) [7]. The process of CPP will lead to depletion of the charge state of the beam and hence a loss in luminosity of the collider. For typical operating conditions of such facilities, these losses might amount to 50% [7] or more. Although the process is strongly coupled at high en- ergy, simulations based on relativistic coupled-channel calculations [8,9] have indicated that leading-order per- turbation theory is adequate for total cross section esti- mates for energies ( E) up to 150 GeV /u [6]. Nonetheless in the energy range E∼1 GeV /u where reliable exper- imental data exist, theory and experiment have been in least agreement. It is this region which we address in this paper. It is now some thirteen years since Becker and co- workers [10–12] obtained the ﬁrst estimates of cross sec-tions for pair creation with simultaneous capture of the electron into the K-shell of one of the colliding ions. However with the exception of Deco and Rivarola, who gave a two-center description of the continuum positron [13], two somewhat artiﬁcial modes of reaction have been distinguished and treated separately when modeling this process: excitation from the negative energy continuum of an ion to one of its bound states [2,11,14] or transfer to a bound state of the other ion [15,16]. Such approaches, while suited to circumstances in which one ion is much more highly charged than the other, lack symmetry and make a distinction between two separate modes of CPP. They lead to diﬀerent formulae within ﬁrst-order pertur- bation theory [15] and hence diﬀerent projectile charge (ZP), target charge ( ZT) and Edependencies. As a re- sult theoretical estimates of the asymptotic ( E→ ∞) energy dependence of the total cross sections are not in agreement, with estimates of [2,3]: σCPP∼ln(E), and more recently [15]: σCPP∼E2. The former is based on the positron-electron pair being created around the same ion, the latter assuming that the pair is divided between the two ions. Of course both pathways will interfere and contribute to the process, thus pointing to the necessity of a two-center treatment for the positron and electron. It has been shown [13] that the two-center description is essential in obtaining the correct positron emission spec- trum and accurate total cross section for CPP. Leading- order perturbation theory (the ﬁrst Born approximation) does give reasonably good estimates for the cross section in the high-energy region ( E∼150 GeV /u) [6] for colli- sions of heavy ions, and has been a reliable model for fast collisions of light ions with low Ztargets in the process of antihydrogen formation involving CPP by antiprotons [1,17]. Experimental results for highly relativistic heavy ions on a variety of targets [7] support the simple scaling law derived from the virtual-photon method (Born approxi- mation) which included multiple scattering from the pro- jectile ion [2] alone: σCPP∼Z2 T, for a given energy. At lower energies this is not the case [5,18,19], the ZTde- pendence is more complex, showing an enhancement in excess of the Z2 T-scaling. In this paper we propose a re- ﬁnement of the Born approximation to take into account higher-order scattering processes. In particular we tackl e the question of the two-center nature of the continuum positron and the polarization of the captured electron. We ﬁnd both these eﬀects are vital and lead to theoreti- cal results which are in accord with experiment. We dis- cuss the physical explanation for scaled cross section en- 1hancement and provide numerical estimates which agree very well with experiment in qualitative and quantitative terms. Through crossing symmetries the leading-order matrix element for the pair production process, in which the electron is captured by the projectile P, P+T→(P, e−) +T+e+(1) is the same as that for the related reaction, e−+P+T→ (P, e−) +T, which is mathematically equivalent to the time-reversed ionization process (P, e−) +T→e−+P+T. (2) In each crossing symmetry the equivalence relies on the electron-positron interaction being much weaker than their interactions with the highly-charged ions; a reason- able assumption. Let rP, tandr′ T, t′be the space and time coordinates of the electron in the projectile and tar- get frames, respectively. The nuclei follow straight-line paths with relative velocity v. The Hamiltonian, in the projectile frame of reference and in atomic units, is given by: H=−icα.∇rP+βc2+VP(rP) +S2V′ T(r′ T) (3) where αandβare Dirac matrices and Sis the operator which transforms the wavefunction from the projectile frame to the target frame, namely S= (1 2+1 2γ)1 2(1−xα./hatwidev), (4) withx=vγc−1(γ+ 1)−1, γ= (1−v2/c2)−1/2, and1 represents the unit matrix. For a given impact parameter b, the transition amplitude can be written in the form [20] A(b) =−i/integraldisplay∞ −∞dt/integraldisplay drPχ† f(H−i∂t)χi, (5) where χiandχfare the initial and ﬁnal states. The undistorted bound-state is approximated by a semirelativistic ( ZT≪c) wavefunction : Φi= Φ0i+ Φ1i, (6) where Φ0i=Z3 2 Pπ−1 2e−ZPrP−ic2t−iEsitωi (7) and Φ1i= (2ic)−1α.∇rPΦ0i, (8) withEsithe non-relativistic eigenenergy, and the elec- tron spin along the beam axis deﬁned as ‘up’ by: ωT i= (1 0 0 0) and ‘down’ by ωT i= (0 1 0 0) The continuum function is given by: Φf= Φ0f+ Φ1f, (9)where Φ0f= (2π)−3 2N∗(ωP)1F1(−iωP; 1;−iγe(verP+ve·rP)) ×e−iγec2t+iγeve·rPS−1 veωf. (10) The spinor correction term is given by Φ1f= (2π)−3 2(2iγec)−1N∗(ωP)× α.∇rP1F1(−iωP; 1;−iγe(verP+ve.rP)) ×e−iγec2t+iγeve.rPS−1veωf. (11) withωP=ZP/ve, where veis the electron velocity. N(ζ) = exp ( πζ/2)Γ(1 −iζ) and, Sve= (1 2+1 2γe)1 2(1−xeα./hatwideve), (12) where xe=veγec−1(γe+1)−1, andγe= (1−v2 e/c2)−1/2. These functions are appropriate when ZP,T≪c. The initial distortion factor L′ iis a matrix given by: L′ i=L′ 0i+L′ 1i, (13) where L′ 0i= exp( −iνTln[γvr′ T+γv·r′ T])1, (14) and L′ 1i=S−1(2iγc)−1α.∇r′ TL0iS, (15) withνT=ZT/v. The ﬁnal state distortion is given by [13]: L′ f=L′ 0f+L′ 1f, (16) where L′ 0f=N∗(ω′ T)1F1(−iω′ T; 1;−iγ′ e(v′ er′ T+v′ e·r′ T))1(17) and L′ 1f=S−1(2iγ′ ec)−1α.∇r′ TL′ 0fS. (18) Retaining terms of ﬁrst order in Z/c, we have relativis- tic continuum distorted wave eikonal initial state (RCD- WEIS) wavefunctions [20,14]: χi=L′ 0iΦ0i+L′ 1iΦ0i+L′ 0iΦ1i, (19) χf=L′ 0fΦ0f+L′ 1fΦ0f+L′ 0fΦ1f. (20) 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Projectile Energy (GeV/u)0.010.020.030.040.0σ/ZT2(µb) R1B RDWB (Au) RDWB (Ag) RDWB (Cu) Experiment (Au) Experiment (Ag) Experiment (Cu) 2FIG. 1. Scaled cross sections, σCPP/Z2 Tin microbarns, for pair-production with electron capture by fully stripped La n- thanum ions (La57+) striking thin foils of Copper ( ZT= 29), Silver ( ZT= 47) and Gold ( ZT= 79). Comparison with RDWB theory for capture to the 1 s-state. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Projectile Energy (GeV/u)0.010.020.030.040.0σ/ZT2(µb) R1B Experiment (Au) Experiment (Ag) Experiment (Cu) RCDWEIS (Cu) RCDWEIS (Ag) RCDWEIS (Au) FIG. 2. Scaled cross sections, σCPP/Z2 Tin microbarns, for pair-production with electron capture by fully stripped La n- thanum ions (La57+) striking thin foils of Copper ( ZT= 29), Silver ( ZT= 47) and Gold ( ZT= 79). Comparison with RCDWEIS theory for capture to the 1 s-state. We compare our results for the Relativistic First Born (R1B), projectile centered, approximation, in which the initial and ﬁnal state distortions are neglected, and the Relativistic Distorted Wave Born (RDWB) approxima- tion [13], where the two-center positron wavefunction is used but the initial state distortion is omitted. The Born approximation, which assumes that the positron is in the continuum of only one of the ions, is ambiguous. The Born approximation of Bertulani and Baur [2] assumes the positron to be a projectile-centered wavefunction, while the Born approximation of Eichler [15] takes the positron to be centered around the target. These two models can be viewed as approximations to the wave- function (20) in which ω′ T= 0 and ωP= 0, respectively. By retaining both scattering center contributions the in- terference eﬀects are taken into account. In comparing RDWB and R1B, it is known that these two-center in- terference eﬀects reduce the cross section for CPP in the relativistic domain [13]. This suppression of CPP is the converse of the two-center enhancement (capture to the continuum) that arises in ion-atom ionization [20] and is analogous to the eﬀect of the Fermi function for β±decay [21].The triply diﬀerential cross section, with respect to the electron momentum ( pe) is deﬁned as: σ(pe) = (dσCPP/dpe) =/integraldisplay db\|A(b)\|2. (21) Using the Fourier transform method [20] we deﬁne T(η) =γv/integraldisplay dbexp(−iη·b)A(b), (22) where T(η) is a product of single-center integrals. The total cross section is obtained from the integral over the ejectile momentum (or velocity) and takes the form: σCPP=/summationdisplay spins1 2π(γv)2/integraldisplayc 0dveγ5 ev2 e/integraldisplayπ 0dθsinθ/integraldisplay dη\|T(η)\|2. (23) where we sum over all the spin states of the electron and positron pair. In order to compute CPP cross sections (1) we note that a positron with energy ǫ+and momentum p+trav- eling forward in time in the ﬁnal state is equivalent to an electron with energy −ǫ+and momentum −p+in the initial state. Thus we must take: ve→ −v+v′ e→ −v′ + ǫf→ −ǫ+ǫ′ f→ −ǫ′ +. (24) The experiments of Belkacem et al. [5,18,19] were for fully stripped Lanthanum ions (La57+) striking thin foils of Copper ( ZT= 29), Silver ( ZT= 47) and Gold ( ZT= 79). The collision energies were E= 0.405,0.956 and 1 .300 GeV/u. The two graphs pre- sented compare the scaled total cross sections ( σCPP/Z2 T) given by theory and experiment. Consider ﬁgure 1 which compares R1B and RDWB with the measurements. Of course, the scaled R1B curve is independent of ZT, and it clearly shows the increase in importance of CPP with in- creasing collision energy. Considering the RDWB model however, we see a progressive reduction in the scaled cross section as ZTincreases. This is in agreement with the ﬁndings of Deco and Rivarola [13], who reported a de- crease in the size of the singly diﬀerential cross sections by an order of magnitude. Their model is essentially our RDWB approximation. While this model shows ZT dependence for the scaled cross section, the trends and absolute values are incorrect. It predicts a suppression of the scaled cross section rather than an enhancement as ZTincreases. Thus the RDWB theory data for Gold gives the lowest scaled cross-section while experiment shows that it should be the highest. The same incorrect trend was obtained by the target-centered Born approx- imation [15]. In contrast (ﬁgure 2) the equivalent results for RCD- WEIS show the observed enhancement with increasing 3ZT. However the theoretical data lie below the experi- ment for the more energetic collisions. In comparing with experiment we have only presented simulations for the dominant channel; capture to the 1 sground state. At very high energies capture to excited states is thought to contribute ∼30% to the total capture cross section [6,22]. This would partly explain the diﬀerences between our theory results and the experimental data. These re- sults are a great improvement on the R1B approximation and are consistent with the experimental data. Other experimental results are available for the impact of faster and more highly charged beams: 10.8 GeV/u Au79+[7] and 0 .956 GeV/u U92+[4] for the same tar- gets. The Gold beam results (table I) indicate that the Z2 Tdependence is established at the higher energies, as predicted by the simple projectile-centered Born approx- imation [10]. Even at this higher energy our theoretical results (table I) show an enhancement in excess of Z2 T. The experiment is in much better accord with the ﬂat scaled cross section data given by the Born approxima- tion [10]. Finally we note that for very large charges, for ex- ample U92+, the semirelativistic approximations for the wavefunctions are not valid. Qualitatively this can lead to underestimation of the cross sections for high charges when using approximate wavefunctions [11,15]. In such cases, Coulomb-Dirac wavefunctions are required in or- der to model the process [11]. In summary, we have proposed and tested a new dis- torted wave model which incorporates and reduces to ap- proximations used previously to describe CPP. We con- ﬁrm that, as has previously been shown [13], the inclusion of distortions from both ions on the positron continuum state leads to a reduction in the cross sections. However including distortion of the bound electron leads to an increase in the total cross sections and a more accurate ﬁt to the experimental data for fully-stripped relativis- tic Lanthanum ions. This improvement in results when including distortions demonstrates once more the neces- sity of a two-center treatment for an accurate theoretical description of this reaction. However our cross section predictions for faster and more highly charged Gold ions do not accord with the experimental data which show a Z2 Tdependence. While the reﬁnements introduced in our model are signiﬁcant theoretical improvements, clearly there still exist several unresolved important diﬀerences between theory and experiment. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS R.J.S. Lee and J.V. Mullan acknowledge ﬁnancial sup- port from the Department of Education for Northern Ire- land through the Distinction Award scheme.[1] G. Baur et al., Phys. Lett. B 368, 251 (1996). [2] C. A. Bertulani and G. Baur, Phys. Rep. 163, 299 (1988). [3] A. J. Baltz, M. J. Rhoades-Brown and J. Wesener, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5569 (1991). [4] A. Belkacem, H. Gould, B. Feinberg, R. R. Bossingham and W. E. Meyerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1514 (1993). [5] A. Belkacem, H. Gould, B. Feinberg, R. R. Bossingham and W. E. Meyerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2432 (1994). [6] H. F. Krause, C. R. Vane, S. Datz, P. Grafstrm, H. Knud- sen, C. Scheidenberger, and R. H. Schuch, Phys. Rev. Lett.801190 (1998). [7] A. Belkacem, N. Claytor, T. Dinneen, B. Feinberg, and H. Gould, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1253 (1998). [8] A. J. Baltz, M. J. Rhoades-Brown and J. Wesener, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2002 (1993). [9] A. J. Baltz, M. J. Rhoades-Brown and J. Wesener, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4842 (1994). [10] U. Becker, N. Gr¨ un and W. Scheid, J. Phys. B 20, 2075 (1987). [11] U. Becker, J. Phys. B 20, 6563 (1987). [12] R. Anholt and U. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4628-4636 (1987). [13] G. R. Deco and R. D. Rivarola, J. Phys. B 22, 1043 (1989). [14] G. R. Deco and R. D. Rivarola, J. Phys. B 21, 1229 (1988); J. Phys. B 21, 1861 (1988); J. Phys. B 21, L299 (1988). [15] J. Eichler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3653 (1995). [16] D. C. Ionescu and J. Eichler, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4960 (1996). [17] C. A. Bertulani and G. Baur, Phys. Rev. D, 034005 (1998). [18] A. Belkacem, H. Gould, B. Feinberg, R. R. Bossingham and W. E. Meyerhof, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4842 (1994). [19] A. Belkacem, H. Gould, B. Feinberg, R. R. Bossingham and W. E. Meyerhof, Phys. Rev. A 56, 2806 (1997). [20] D.S.F Crothers and J. F. McCann, J. Phys. B 16, 3229 (1983). [21] H. Enge, Introduction to Nuclear Physics (Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1978). [22] A. J. Baltz, M. J. Rhoades-Brown and J. Wesener, Phys. Rev. E 54, 4233 (1996). TABLE I. Total cross sections, σCPPin barns, for electron capture from pair production for 10.8 GeV/nucleon Au79+ impact on Gold, Silver and Copper foils. ZTExperiment [7] CDWEIS theory Becker et al[10] 79 8.8±1.5 15.85 10.1 47 4.4±0.73 3.44 3.6 29 1.77±0.31 0.74 1.36 4
arXiv:physics/0006026v1 [physics.chem-ph] 9 Jun 2000The hydration number of Na+in liquid water Susan B. Rempe and Lawrence R. Pratt Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 USA (September 21, 2013) Abstract An ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics simulation of a Na+ion in aqueous solution is presented and discussed. The calculation treats a Na+ion and 32 water molecules with periodic boundary conditions on a cubic volu me determined by an estimate of zero partial molar volume for this solute in water at normal density and at a temperature of 344 ±24 K. Analysis of the last half of the 12 ps trajectory shows 4.6 water molecules occupying the inner hydration shell of the Na+ion on average, with 5 being the most probable occupancy. The self-diﬀusion coeﬃcient observed for the Na+is 1.0×10−5cm2/s. The quasi- chemical theory of solutions provides the framework for two more calculations. First a complementary calculation, based on electronic str ucture results for ion-water clusters hydrated by a dielectric continuum mode l of the solution, predicts an average hydration shell occupancy of 4.0. This u nderestimate can be attributed to the harmonic approximation of interaction s within the clus- ters and to the approximate treatment with the dielectric co ntinuum model of extra-cluster contributions to the free energy of solvat ion. Finally, an in- formation theory ﬁt of the simulation data leads to an an abso lute hydration free energy estimate of -80 kcal/mol. keywords: ab initio molecular dynamics, dielectric contin uum, electronic structure, hy- dration, information theory, quasi-chemical theory, sodi um ion 11. Introduction Solvation of simple ions in aqueous solution is not yet fully understood despite its funda- mental importance to chemical and biological processes. Fo r example, disagreement persists regarding the hydration number of the Na+ion in liquid water. A pertinent problem of current interest centers on the selectivity of biological i on channels; it seems clear that the selective transport of K+relative to Na+ions in potassium channels [1–3] depends on details of the ion hydration that might diﬀer for K+relative to Na+. Experimental eﬀorts to deﬁne the hydration structure of Na+(aq) using diﬀraction [4,5] and spectroscopic [6] methods produce a hydration number ra nging between four and six [7]. Simulations have obtained a range of values, but most pr edict six water molecules in the inner hydration sphere of the Na+ion [8–19]. An ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics simulation produced ﬁve inner shell water molecules neighboring Na+(aq) [20]. An important limitation of theoretical studies of ion hydra tion concerns the suﬃciency of model force ﬁelds used in classical statistical mechanical calculations. In the most custom- ary approaches, interatomic force ﬁelds used in theories or simulations derive from empirical ﬁts of a parameterized model to a variety of experimental dat a. ‘Ab initio’ molecular dy- namics avoids this intermediate modeling step by approxima te solution of the electronic Schroedinger equation for each conﬁguration of the nuclei [ 21,22]. This technique thus goes signiﬁcantly beyond conventional simulations regarding t he accuracy of the force ﬁelds. It also augments theories built more directly on electronic st ructure studies of ion-water com- plexes by adopting approximate descriptions of the solutio n environment of those complexes [23–28]. Relative to conventional simulations, ‘ab initio’ molecul ar dynamics simulations also have some important limitations due to the high computation al demand. Applications of the method have been restricted to small systems simulated f or short times. For example, an ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics study [20] of the Na+(aq) ion comparable to the present work obtained a thermal trajectory lasting 3 ps after minimal the rmal aging. The present work, though still limited to relatively small systems, pushes su ch calculations to longer times that might permit more precise determination for Na+(aq) of primitive hydration properties. The analysis here utilizes the last half of a 12 ps thermal trajec tory. The quasi-chemical theory [23–27] and separate electronic structure calculations on Na(H 2O)n+complexes assist in this analysis. 2. Methods The system consisted of one Na+ion and 32 water molecules in a cubic box with edge 9.86518 ˚A and periodic boundary conditions. The dimensions of the bo x correspond to a water density of 1 g/cm3and zero partial molar volume for the solute. Initial condit ions were obtained as in an earlier ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamic s simulation on Li+(aq) [23]. In that earlier work, an optimized structure for the inner sp here Li(H 2O)6+complex was equilibrated with 26 water molecules under conventional si mulation conditions for liquid water, utilizing a current model force ﬁeld and assuming a pa rtial molar volume of zero. In the present calculation, the same pre-equilibrated system was used as an initial conﬁguration for the ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics except that an optimi zed structure for the inner sphere Na(H 2O)6+complex replaced the hexa-coordinated Li+structure. Constant pressure 2or constant water activity simulations, deﬁned by intensiv e rather than extensive variables, probably would produce a more useful characterization of th e solvent thermodynamic state for these small systems, but those alternatives are current ly impractical. Molecular dynamics calculations based upon a gradient-cor rected electron density func- tional description of the electronic structure and interat omic forces were carried out on this Na+(aq) system utilizing the VASP program [29]. The ions were re presented by ultrasoft pseudopotentials [30] and a kinetic energy cutoﬀ of 31.5 Ryd berg limited the plane wave basis expansions of the valence electronic wave functions. The equations of motion were integrated in time steps of 1 fs, which is small enough to samp le the lowest vibrational frequency of water. A thermostat constrained the system tem perature to 300 K during the ﬁrst 4.3 ps of simulation time. After removing the thermosta t, the temperature rose slightly and then leveled oﬀ by 6 ps to an average of 344 ±24 K. During the simulation, the initial n=6 hydration structure relaxed into n=4 and n=5 alternatives, such as those shown in Fig. 1. All analyses reported here rely on the trajectory gen erated subsequent to the 6 ps of aging with the system at a temperature elevated from room t emperature. 3. Results The ion-oxygen radial distribution function is shown in Fig . 2. The ﬁrst maximum occurs at a radius of 2.35 ˚A from the Na+ion and the minimum at radius 3.12 ˚A demarcates the boundary of the ﬁrst and innermost hydration shell. An avera ge of∝angbracketleftn∝angbracketright=4.6 water molecules occupy the inner hydration shell. Fig. 3 tracks the instanta neous number of water oxygen atoms found within the ﬁrst hydration shell of the Na+, deﬁned by radius r ≤3.12˚A for the upper panel. The fractions x4andx5of four-coordinate and ﬁve-coordinate hydration structures, respectively, constitute x4=40% and x5=56% of the last 6 ps of the simulation. Structures in which the Na+ion acquires six innershell water molecules occur with a 4% frequency, while structures with three and seven innershel l water molecules occur less than 1% of the time. Analysis of the mean-square displacement of t he Na+ion (Fig. 4) produces a self-diﬀusion constant of 1.0 ×10−5cm2/s, which agrees reasonably well with experimental results [31]. These results correspond coarsely with an ‘ab initio’ molec ular dynamics calculation on this system carried-out independently [20]. The most proba ble inner shell occupancy found there was also ﬁve, but the probabilities of n=4 and n=6 were r eversed from what we ﬁnd here. This diﬀerence may be associated with the lower temper ature used in Ref [20]. With the present data, we attempted to determine x0, the unobserved fraction of zero- coordinate hydration structures, using a maximum entropy ﬁ tting procedure [32,33]. The motivation for this arises from the quasi-chemical theory o f solutions, according to which x0 contributes to µex Na+, the excess chemical potential or absolute hydration free e nergy of the ion in liquid water [27], βµNa+ex= lnx0−ln /angbracketleftBigg e−β∆U/productdisplay j(1−bNa+j)/angbracketrightBigg 0 . (1) Here the inner shell is deﬁned by specifying a function bNa+jthat is equal to one (1) when sol- vent molecule j is inside the deﬁned inner shell and zero (0) o therwise; ∆ Uis the interaction energy of the solvent with the solute Na+that is treated as a test particle, β−1=kBT, and 3the subscript zero associated with ∝angbracketleft. . .∝angbracketright0indicates a test particle average [27]. The second term on the right-hand side of Eq. (1) is the excess chemical p otential of the solute lacking inner shell solvent molecules whereas the ﬁrst term is the fr ee energy of allowing solvent molecules to occupy the inner shell. The validity of Eq. (1) h as been established elsewhere [27]. The ﬁrst term on the right of Eq. 1 is referred to as the ch emical contribution and the second term is the outer sphere contribution to the excess ch emical potential. The utility of this quasi-chemical formulation is the sugge stion [32] of more detailed study of the xn, the fractions of n-coordinate hydration structures found in solution, on the basis of the equilibria forming inner shell complexes of diﬀ erent aggregation number: Na(H 2O)m=0++ nH 2O⇀↽Na(H 2O)n+. (2) Utilizing the chemical equilibrium ratios Kn=ρNa(H 2O)n+ ρNa(H 2O)m=0+ρH2On, (3) the normalized xncan be expressed as xn=KnρH2On /summationtext m≥0KmρH2Om. (4) Theρσare the number densities and, in particular, ρH2Ois the molecule number density of liquid water. If the medium external to the clusters is neg lected, the equilibrium ratios, denoted as Kn(0), can be obtained from electronic structure calculations on the complexes, assuming the harmonic approximation for the thermal motion of the atoms. Finally uti- lization of a dielectric continuum approximation for the ou ter sphere contributions to the chemical potential gives a natural, though approximate, qu asi-chemical model [23–28]. For the present problem, the quasi-chemical model was imple mented following precisely the procedures of the earlier study of Li+(aq) [23], except that the sodium ion cavity radius for the dielectric model calculation was assigned as R Na+=3.1˚A, the distance of the ﬁrst minimum of the radial distribution function of Fig. 2. The te mperature and density used were 344 K and 1.0 g/cm3and the value of the bulk dielectric constant was 65.3 [34]. Results of the calculations are summarized in Fig. 5. The ele ctronic structure results are consonant with those found previously for the Li+ion. The n=4 inner sphere gas-phase complex has the lowest free energy. Outer sphere placements are obtained for additional water molecules in the minimum energy structures of larger c lusters. Nevertheless, attention is here restricted to inner sphere structures. The mean occu pation number predicted by this quasi-chemical model is ∝angbracketleftn∝angbracketright= 4.0; the computed absolute hydration free energy of the Na+ ion under these conditions is -103 kcal/mol, not including a ny repulsive force (packing) contributions. An experimental value for Na+ion in liquid water at room temperature is -87 kcal/mol [35]. The populations obtained from the quasi-chemical model, ˆ xn, can serve as a default model for a maximum entropy inference of xnusing the observed ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics data [32]. As outlined above, there is particular interest i n estimating the fraction of non- occupied hydration structures, x0, because of its relationship in quasi-chemical theory to th e absolute hydration free energy of the ion. In this approach w e model 4xj= ˆxjexp [−λ0−jλ1−j(j−1)λ2/2−. . .], (5) with Lagrange multipliers λkadjusted to conform to available moment information /angbracketleftBigg/parenleftBiggn j/parenrightBigg/angbracketrightBigg =/summationdisplay kxk/parenleftBiggk j/parenrightBigg (6) for j = 0, 1, 2, .... The results of this inference were problematical and it is cl ear that more data and theory will be required to make this a useful technique for extendin g data from ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics simulations. Fig. 6 gives a record of qualitativel y reasonable results obtained. One diﬃculty is that the ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics obse rves a nonzero x7. Uti- lizing the electronic structure methods, we found no minimu m energy inner-sphere hepta- coordinated clusters; see also Ref. [36]. Furthermore, the observed x7is likely to be relatively less accurate and it is furthest away from the n=0 element tha t is desired. Therefore, in the ﬁrst ﬁtting attempt, we excluded n=7 conﬁgurations of the ‘a b initio’ molecular dynamics and renormalized the probabilities xnand moments obtained for n <7. As the upper panel in Fig. 6 shows, this simple maximum entropy model is qualitati vely satisfactory although not quantitatively convincing. The chemical contribution sug gested by Fig. 6 is approximately -68 kcal/mol. Using the Born formula, q2(1−1/ǫ)/2Rwith R=3.1 ˚A, to estimate the outer sphere contributions represented by the last term in Eq. 1, t hen the net absolute hydration free energy falls in the neighborhood of -120 kcal/mol. Sinc e experimental values for the absolute hydration free energy at room temperature center a round -90 kcal/mol, this com- parison shows that the present free energy results are not to be interpreted quantitatively, but rather as indicative of the present state of the theory. The packing contributions that have been neglected here may be much more substantial than has been assumed and, more generally, the outer sphere c ontributions require more speciﬁc consideration. Better default models should help a nd it is natural to think of using conventional simulation results with model force ﬁelds for default models ˆ xn. Order-of- magnitude increases in the sizes of the simulated system and in the simulation time would help, but are unlikely in the near future. In a second attempt to ﬁt the simulation data, we used all the p robabilities observed in the simulation, including x7. Since the quasi-chemical results produced too narrow a distribution, we substituted the broader ideal gas or Gibbs distribution for the default model, ˆ xn∝1/n!. The results, illustrated in the middle panel of Fig. 6, sho w an improved ﬁt. Here the chemical contribution to the free energy is -28 k cal/mol, yielding a net absolute hydration free energy of -81 kcal/mol when the same Born form ula is used to estimate the outer sphere contributions. A more speciﬁc identiﬁcation of the diﬃculty with the maximu m entropy modeling is associated with diﬀerent behavior of the xnresults for n ≤4 and for n ≥5. Previous ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics on K+(aq) similarly hints that the innermost four water molecule s have a special status [36]. The radial distribution function of F ig. 2, somewhat better resolved than heretofore, is relevant to this issue. It is clear that F ig. 2 doesn’t rule out the possibility of two populations of water molecules within r <3.1˚A, although it doesn’t speciﬁcally suggest that possibility either. We can achieve a more faithful ﬁt of the data following these i deas even in the regret- table absence of further theory and simulation speciﬁc to th is problem. This better ﬁtting 5requires, however, more aggressive hypotheses motivated b y the following points. Firstly, the electronic structure calculations on clusters failed t o ﬁnd a stable n=7 cluster despite the fact that an n=7 component was seen in the ‘ab initio’ mole cular dynamics. This intro- duced some ambiguity in the ﬁrst ﬁtting. Secondly, naive ﬁtt ing of the available xnsuggest diﬀerent simple forms for the n ≤4 and for n ≥5 ranges. Together, these points suggest that more restrictive deﬁnitions of inner sphere geometries mig ht be helpful for these chemically motivated approaches. Thirdly, as the second ﬁtting showed , maximum entropy modeling is more eﬀective when the default model is broader than the obse rved distribution. In view of these points, we tried a ﬁnal ﬁt in which we ﬁrst reduced the ra dius deﬁning the inner sphere to R=2.68 ˚A, for which <n>is close to 4 (see bottom panel of Fig. 2). This produced a new set of data points from the molecular dynamics simulation. d istribution. Additionally, we again abandoned the cluster harmonic default model and adop ted the broader Gibbs default model. The results, shown in the lowest panel of Fig. 6, sugge st lnx0≈-25, which translates to -17 kcal/mol as a chemical contribution. If we again use th e Born approximation for the outer sphere contribution, this time with R=2.68 ˚A, we obtain an absolute hydration free energy estimate of -78 kcal/mol. 4. Conclusions The ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics simulation predicts the most probable occupancy of the inner shell of Na+(aq) to be 5 and the mean occupancy to be 4.6 water molecules at inﬁnite dilution, T=344 K, and a nominal water density of 1 g/cm3. The simulation produces both a satisfactory Na-O radial distribution func tion and self-diﬀusion coeﬃcient for Na+, but these satisfactory results required more care with the rmalization and averaging time than is most common with these demanding calculations. The complementary calculation framed in terms of quasi-che mical theory and based on electronic structure results for ion-water clusters, inte racting harmonically and solvated in a dielectric continuum, underestimates the average and mos t probable inner shell water molecule occupancy for Na+in liquid water. Maximum entropy ﬁtting of the inner shell occupancy distribution shows that the ion-water cluster re sults yield a distribution signiﬁ- cantly narrower than that obtained from the simulations. Fo r this reason, inference of the absolute hydration free energy of Na+(aq) based on the cluster electronic structure results and utilizing information gleaned from the ‘ab initio’ mole cular dynamics failed; a variety of theoretical issues, such as anharmonicity in the small clus ters and reﬁnement of a solution model, require further consideration. Abandonment of the cluster electronic structure results in favor of a broader default model improved the ﬁt of the simulation data. In an even more a ggressive ﬁtting scheme, new data was gathered from the simulation using a more restri ctive deﬁnition of the inner hydration shell that allowed an occupation of just 4 water mo lecules on average and the ﬁt again proceeded with the broader default model. Both of thes e ﬁts produced a satisfactory prediction of -80 kcal/mol for the absolute hydration free e nergy of Na+in liquid water at a temperature elevated from room temperature. We acknowledge helpful discussions of many related issues w ith Gerhard Hummer and Joel Kress. This work was supported by the US Department of En ergy under contract W-7405-ENG-36 and the LDRD program at Los Alamos. 6References and Notes (1) D. A. Doyle, J. M. Cabral, R. A. Pfuetzner, A. L. Kuo, J. M. G ulbis, S. L. Cohen, B. T. Chait, and R. MacKinnon, Science 280 (1998) 69–77. (2) L. Guidoni, V. Torre, and P. Carloni, Biochem. 38 (1999) 8599–8604. (3) A. Laio and V. Torre, Biophys. J. 76 (1999) 129–148. (4) R. Caminiti, G. Nacheri, G. Paschina, G. Piccaluga, and G . Pinna, J. Chem. Phys. 72 (1980) 4522–4528. (5) N. T. Skipper and G. W. Nielson, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1 (1989) 4141–4154. (6) K. H. Michaellian and M. Moskovits, Nature 273 (1978) 135–136. (7) H. Ohtaki and T. Radnai, Chem. Rev. 93 (1993) 1157–1204. (8) K. Heinzinger, and G. P´ alink´ as, in THE CHEMICAL PHYSICS OF SOLVATION Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985; pp. 313. (9) M. Mezei and D. L. Beveridge, J. Chem. Phys. 74 (1981) 6902–6910. (10) R. W. Impey, P. A. Madden, and I. R. McDonald, J. Phys. Chem. 87 (1983) 5071–5083. (11) J. Chandrasekhar, D. C. Spellmeyer, and W. L. Jorgensen ,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106 (1984) 903–910. (12) D. G. Bounds, Mol. Phys. 54 (1985) 1335–1355. (13) M. A. Wilson, A. Pohorille, and L. R. Pratt, J. Chem. Phys. 83 (1985) 5832–5836. (14) S. B. Zhu and G. W. Robinson, Z. Naturforsch. A 46 (1991) 221–228. (15) K. Heinzinger, in M. U. Palma, M. B. Palma-Vittorelli, a nd F. Patak (Eds.), WATER- BIOMOLECULE INTERACTIONS SIF, Bologna, 1993, pp. 23–30. (16) S. H. Lee and J. C. Rasaiah, J. Chem. Phys. 101 (1994) 6964–6974. (17) G. Toth, J. Chem. Phys. 105 (1996) 5518–5524. (18) S. Obst and H. Bradaczek, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 15677–15687. (19) S. Koneshan, J. C. Rasaiah, R. M. Lynden-Bell, and S. H. L ee,J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 4193–4204. (20) J. A. White, E. Schwegler, G. Galli, and F. Gygi, personal communication 2000. (21) D. Marx, in C. Caccamo, J.-P. Hansen, and G. Stell (Eds.) , in NEW APPROACHES TO PROBLEMS IN LIQUID STATE THEORY, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999 , 439–458. (22) D. Alf` e, G. E. De Wijs, G. Kresse, and M. J. Gillan, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 77 (2000) 871-879. 7(23) S. B. Rempe, L. R. Pratt, G. Hummer,J. D. Kress, R. L. Mart in, and A. Redondo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 966–967. (24) L. R. Pratt and R. A. LaViolette, Mol. Phys. 94 (1998) 909–915. (25) G. Hummer, L. R. Pratt, and A. E. Garc´ ıa, J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998) 7885–7895. (26) R. L. Martin, P. J. Hay, and L. R. Pratt, J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998) 3565–3573. (27) L. R. Pratt, and S. B. Rempe, in L. R. Pratt and G. Hummer (E ds.),SIMULATION AND THEORY OF ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS IN SOLUTION AIP, New York, 1999, 172–201. (28) M. J. Frisch, et al.Gaussian 98 (Revision A.2) . Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1998. (29) G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1993) 558–561. (30) G. Kresse and J. Hafner, J. Phys.: Condens. Mat. 6 (1994) 8245–8257. (31) H. G. Hertz, in F. Franks (Ed.), WATER: A COMPREHENSIVE TREATISE Vol. 3, Plenum Press, New York, 1973. (32) G. Hummer, S. Garde, A. E Garc ´ia, and L. R. Pratt, Chem. Phys. “New Perspectives on Hydrophobic Eﬀects” (in press 2000), LA-UR-00-222. (33) L. R. Pratt, S. Garde, and G. Hummer in C. Caccamo, J.-P. H ansen, and G. Stell (Eds.), in NEW APPROACHES TO PROBLEMS IN LIQUID STATE THEORY , Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999, 407–420. (34) E. Uematsu and E. U. Franck, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 9 (1980) 1291–1305. (35) Y. Marcus, Biophys. Chem. 51 (1994) 111–127. (36) L. Y. Ramaniah, M. Bernasconi, and M. Parrinello J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 6839– 6843. (37) L. Y. Ramaniah, M. Bernasconi, and M. Parrinello J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 1587– 1591. 8FIGURES Figure 1. Structures from ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics calculatio ns. In the top panel, the Na+ion has ﬁve (5) inner shell water molecule neighbors. The bot tom panel shows the four-coordinate structure produced 70 fs later. The bon ds identify water oxygen atoms within 3.1 ˚A of the Na+ion. The hydrogen, sodium, and oxygen atoms are shown as open , black, and gray circles, respectively. 90123456 0 1 2 3 4 5gNaO(r) n(r) r (Å) Figure 2. Radial distribution function g NaO(r) and number n(r) of oxygen atoms neigh- boring the Na+ion. Error estimates of ±2σare also plotted for the radial distribution function. σwas estimated by dividing the observed trajectory into four blocks of approxi- mate duration 1.5 ps; those blocks were assumed to provide in dependent observations. The ﬁrst minimum in the g(r) function is at r=3.12 ˚A where g(r) falls to 0.2. Here an average of 4.6 oxygen atoms surround the Na+ion. 1001234567 024681012345678910n energy (eV) t (ps) 01234567 024681012345678910n energy (eV) t (ps)r=3.12 Å r=2.68 Å Figure 3. The solid line in the upper plot depicts the number of oxygen a toms within a radius of 3.12 ˚A from the Na+at each conﬁguration in the molecular dynamics simulation. A radius of 2.68 ˚A deﬁnes the nearest oxygen neighbors in the lower plot. The d ashed lines show the kinetic energy per atom during the simulation, plot ted after removal of the 300 K thermostat at 4.3 ps. The axis on the right refers to the kinet ic energy values. In the upper plot, an average of 4.6 water molecules surround the Na+ion, while an average of 4.0 water molecules surround the ion in the lower plot. 1100.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 050 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 t (fs) <Δr(t) 2> (Å2) Figure 4. Mean-square displacement of the Na+ion plotted with respect to the time in- terval analyzed. Analysis of the slope from 200-400 ps gives a diﬀusion constant of 1.0 ×10−5 cm2/s. 12-100-80-60-40-200 0 1 2 3 4 5 6free energy (kcal/mol) nΔG( ) 0 − ++ RT xn NalnΔµ Figure 5. Free energies for Na+ion hydration in liquid water as a function of the number of inner shell water neighbors at T=344 K and ρH2O=1 g/cm3. The lowest results (open diamonds) show quasi-chemical approximate values for the l iquid, labelled according to the quasi-chemical interpretation. This graph indicates that the n=4 inner sphere structure is most probable under these conditions. The radius used for th e Na+ion here is 3.1 ˚A, though a substantial reduction of this value produced only a minor c hange in the inferred absolute hydration free energy; otherwise the procedure is the same a s in previous reports [23,27]. The absolute hydration free energy predicted here is -103 kcal/ mol. The results marked ∆G(0) (ﬁlled circles) are the free energies predicted for the reac tion Na++ n H 2O in an ideal gas at p = 1 atm ≡p0and T=344 K. The minimum value is at n=4. The middle graph (cro sses) add to the ideal gas results the ‘replacement’ contribution −nRT ln[RT ρH2O/p0] =−n∗5.03 kcal/mol with T=344 K, and ρH2O=1 g/cm3. 13n lnxn -25-20-15-10-51 23 4 5 6 71 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 -20 -30 -40-100-20 -40 -60 -80 Figure 6. Results for the inference of x0from ‘ab initio’ molecular dynamics information. The solid points represent the information measured from th e molecular dynamics simula- tion, the dotted lines refer to the default models, and the so lid lines show the ﬁt achieved by the information theory approach. In the top panel, the obser ved inner hydration occupancy x7was excluded and the quasi-chemical default model moments u sed were ∝angbracketleftn∝angbracketright=4.633 and ∝angbracketleftn(n−1)/2∝angbracketright∝angbracketright=8.577. In the middle panel, all xnobserved in the simulation were included, and a Gibbs default model was used along with the same moments as above. The bottom panel shows the results of more aggressive ﬁtting using the r estrictive inner sphere radius of R=2.68 ˚A and the moments ∝angbracketleftn∝angbracketright=4.046, and ∝angbracketleftn(n−1)/2∝angbracketright∝angbracketright=6.393 with the Gibbs default model. 14
arXiv:physics/0006027v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 9 Jun 2000Plasma Oscillations and Expansion of an Ultracold Neutral P lasma S. Kulin, T. C. Killian, S. D. Bergeson∗, and S. L. Rolston National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersb urg, MD 20899-8424 (Accepted Phys. Rev. Lett.) We report the observation of plasma oscillations in an ul- tracold neutral plasma. With this collective mode we probe the electron density distribution and study the expansion o f the plasma as a function of time. For classical plasma con- ditions, i.e.weak Coulomb coupling, the expansion is domi- nated by the pressure of the electron gas and is described by a hydrodynamic model. Discrepancies between the model and observations at low temperature and high density may be due to strong coupling of the electrons. One of the most interesting features of neutral plasmas is the rich assortment of collective modes that they sup- port. The most common of these is the plasma oscillation [1], in which electrons oscillate around their equilibrium positions and ions are essentially stationary. This mode is a valuable probe of ionized gases because the oscillation frequency depends solely on the electron density. In an ultracold neutral plasma as reported in [2], the density is nonuniform and changing in time. A diag- nostic of the density is thus necessary for a variety of experiments, such as determination of the three-body re- combination rate at ultralow temperature [3], and obser- vation of the eﬀects of strong Coulomb coupling [4] in a two-component system. A density probe would also aid in the study of the evolution of a dense gas of cold Ry- dberg atoms to a plasma [5], which may be an analog of the Mott insulator-conductor phase transition [6]. In this work we excite plasma oscillations in an ultra- cold neutral plasma by applying a radio frequency (rf) electric ﬁeld. The oscillations are used to map the plasma density distribution and reveal the particle dynamics and energy ﬂow during the expansion of the ionized gas. The creation of an ultracold plasma has been described in [2]. A few million metastable xenon atoms are laser cooled to approximately 10 µK. The peak density is about 2×1010cm−3and the spatial distribution of the cloud is Gaussian with an rms radius σ≈220µm. These parame- ters are determined with resonant laser absorption imag- ing [7]. To produce the plasma, up to 25% of the atoms are photoionized in a two-photon excitation. Light for this process is provided by a Ti:sapphire laser at 882nm and a pulsed dye laser at 514nm (10 ns pulse length). Because of the small electron-ion mass ratio, the result- ing electrons have an initial kinetic energy ( Ee) approxi- mately equal to the diﬀerence between the photon energy and the ionization potential. In this study we vary Ee/kBbetween 1 and 1000K. The initial kinetic energy of the ions varies between 10 µK and 4mK. For detection of charged particles, a small DC ﬁeld (about 1mV/cm) directs electrons to a single channel electron multiplier and ions to a multichannel plate de- tector. The amplitude of the rf ﬁeld that excites plasma oscillations, F, varies between 0 .2−20 mV/cm rms. All electric ﬁelds are applied to the plasma with grids located above and below the laser-atom interaction region. In the absence of a magnetic ﬁeld, the frequency of plasma oscillations is given by fe= (1/2π)/radicalbig e2ne/ǫ0me [1]. Here, eis the elementary charge, neis the electron density, ǫ0is the permittivity of vacuum, and meis the electron mass. This relation is most often derived for an inﬁnite homogeneous plasma, but it is also valid in our inhomogeneous system for modes which are localized in regions of near resonant density. Corrections to fedue to ﬁnite temperature [8] depend on the wavelength of the collective oscillation, which is diﬃcult to accurately estimate. Such corrections are not expected to be large and will be neglected. We observe plasma oscillations with frequencies from 1 to 250MHz. This corresponds to resonant electron densities, nr, between 1 ×104cm−3 and 8 ×108cm−3. The oscillation frequency is sensitive only to ne, but, as explained in [2], the core of the plasma is neutral. This implies that plasma oscillations measure electron and ion densities in this region ( ne=ni≡n). Figure 1a shows electron signals from an ultracold neu- tral plasma created by photoionization at time t= 0. Some electrons leave the sample and arrive at the de- tector at about 1 µs, producing the ﬁrst peak in the sig- nal. The resulting excess positive charge in the plasma creates a Coulomb potential well that traps the remain- ing electrons [2]. In the work reported here, typically 90−99% of the electrons are trapped. Debye shielding maintains local neutrality inside a radius rebeyond which the electron density drops to zero on a length scale equal toλD. The value of redepends on the fraction of elec- trons that has escaped, and λDis the Debye screening length, λD=/radicalbig ǫ0kBTe/e2ne, where Teis the electron temperature. For our conditions re>∼2σ, and λD≪σ. As the plasma expands, the depth of the Coulomb well decreases, allowing the remaining electrons to leave the trap. This produces the broad peak at ≈25µs. In the presence of an rf ﬁeld an additional peak appears in the electron signal (Fig. 1a). We understand the gen- eration of this peak as follows: The applied rf ﬁeld excites plasma oscillations only where the frequency is resonant. Energy is thus pumped into the plasma in the shell with 1the appropriate electron density ( n=nr). The ampli- tude of the collective electron motion is much less than σ, but the acquired energy is collisionally redistributed among all the electrons within 10 −1000ns [9], raising the electron temperature. This increases the evaporation rate of electrons out of the Coulomb well, which produces the plasma oscillation response on the electron signal. The resonant response at a given time, S(t), is pro- portional to the number of electrons in the region where the density equals nr. If we make a simple local den- sity approximation and neglect decoherence of the oscil- lations, S(t)∝F2/integraltext d3r n(r, t)δ[n(r, t)−nr]. The width in time of the observed signal (Fig. 1a) reﬂects the den- sity distribution of the sample [10]. At early times when the density is higher than nralmost everywhere, S(t) is negligibly small. As the cloud expands and the density decreases, the response grows because the fraction of the plasma which is in resonance increases. The peak of the response appears approximately when the average den- sity, ¯n, becomes resonant with the rf ﬁeld. S(t) vanishes when the peak density is less than nr. The resonant response arrives later for lower frequency (Fig. 1b) as expected because ¯ ndecreases in time. As- suming that the plasma density proﬁle remains Gaussian during the expansion, S(t) can be evaluated and its am- plitude scales as F2/nr. In Fig. 1b the data have been normalized by this factor and the resulting amplitudes are similar for all conditions. By equating ¯ ntonrwhen the response peak arrives, we can plot the average plasma density as a function of time (Fig. 2). The data are well described by a self similar expansion of a Gaussian cloud, ¯ n=N/[4π(σ2 0+v2 0t2)]3/2, where σ0is the initial rms radius and v0is the rms radial velocity at long times. Nis determined independently by counting the number of neutral atoms with and without photoionization. The extracted values of σ0are equal to the size of the initial atom cloud. In such an expansion, the average kinetic energy per particle is 3 mv2 0/2. Figure 3 shows the dependence of v0on density and initial electron energy. We ﬁrst discuss data with Ee≥ 70 K, for which the expansion velocities approximately follow v0=/radicalbig Ee/αm i, where miis the ion mass and α= 1.7 is a ﬁt parameter. For the plasma to expand at this rate, the ions must acquire, on average, a veloc- ity characteristic of the electron energy. This is much greater than the initial ion thermal velocity. Electron- ion equipartition of energy would yield v0=/radicalbig Ee/3mi, close to the observed value. However, due to the large electron-ion mass diﬀerence, this thermalization require s milliseconds [9]. The observed expansion, in contrast, oc- curs on a time scale of tens of microseconds. One might expect the expansion to be dominated by the Coulomb energy arising from the slight charge imbalance of the plasma, but this energy is about an order of magnitude less than the observed expansion energy. Also, by Gauss’ law, it would only be important in the expansion of thenon-neutral outer shell of the plasma. The oscillation probe provides information only on the neutral core be- cause it relies on the presence of electrons. A hydrodynamic model [11], which describes the plasma on length scales larger than λD, shows that the expansion is driven by the pressure of the electron gas. The pressure is exerted on the ions by outward-moving electrons that are stopped and accelerated inward in the trap. For the hydrodynamic calculation, ions and elec- trons are treated as ﬂuids with local densities na(r) and average velocities ua(r) =∝an}b∇acketle{tva(r)∝an}b∇acket∇i}ht. Here, arefers to ei- ther electrons or ions, and ∝an}b∇acketle{t· · ·∝an}b∇acket∇i}htdenotes a local ensemble average. Particle and momentum conservation lead to the momentum balance equations mana/bracketleftbigg∂ua ∂t+ (ua· ∇)ua/bracketrightbigg =−∇(nakBTa) +Rab. HerenakBTarepresents a scalar pressure [11]. The ion and electron equations are coupled by Rab, which is the rate of momentum exchange between species aandb. The exact form of this term is unimportant for this study, butRab=−Rba. Plasma hydrodynamic equations typi- cally have electric and magnetic ﬁeld terms, but applied and internally generated ﬁelds are negligible when de- scribing the expansion. We can make a few simplifying approximations that are valid before the system has signiﬁcantly expanded. The directed motion is negligible, so we set ua≈0 ev- erywhere. Because ne≈ni=n,∂ue/∂t≈∂ui/∂t. Due to the small electron mass, the rate of increase of aver- age electron momentum is negligible compared to that of the ions. The electron momentum balance equation then yields ∇(nkBTe)≈Rei, which describes a balance between the pressure of the electron gas and collisional interactions. This is the hydrodynamic depiction of the trapping of electrons by the ions. In the ion momentum balance equation, we eliminate Rieusing the electron equation, and we drop the pres- sure term because the ion thermal motion is negligible. Thus min∂ui/∂t≈ −∇ (nkBTe), which shows that the pressure of the electron gas drives the expansion [12]. This result implies that the ions acquire a velocity of or- der/radicalbig kBTe/mi, which is in qualitative agreement with the high Eedata of Fig. 3. To calculate the expansion velocity more quantitatively, one must consider that as electrons move in the expanding trap, they perform work on the ions and cool adiabatically. The thermodynamics of this process [13] is beyond the scope of this study. The data in Fig. 3 indicate that about 90% of the ini- tial kinetic energy of the electrons is transferred to the ions’ kinetic energy, 3 miv2 0/2 = 3Ee/2α. This does not imply that the temperature of the ions becomes compara- ble to Ee/kBin this process. For the ions, uiincreases, butmi∝an}b∇acketle{t\|vi−ui\|2∝an}b∇acket∇i}ht, which measures random thermal mo- tion and thus temperature, is expected to remain small. 2This follows from slow ion-electron thermalization [9] and correlation between position and velocity during the ex- pansion [14]. We now turn our attention to systems with Ee<70 K (Fig. 3). They expand faster than expected from an ex- trapolation of v0=/radicalbig Ee/αm i, and thus do not even qualitatively follow the hydrodynamic model. A relative measure of the deviation is ( miv2 0−Ee/α)/(Ee/α). Fig- ure 4 shows that the relative deviation increases with in- creasing electron Coulomb coupling parameter [4], Γ e= (e2/4πε0a)/kBTe.Here, a= (4πn/3)−1/3is the Wigner- Seitz radius, nis the peak density at t= 0, and the temperature is calculated by 3 kBTe/2 =Ee. The fact that the relative deviation depends only on Γe, and that it becomes signiﬁcant as Γ eapproaches 1, suggests that we are observing the eﬀects of strong cou- pling of the electrons [15]. The hydrodynamic model of the plasma is only valid when Γ e≪1. When Γ e>∼1, elec- tron and ion spatial distributions show short range corre- lated ﬂuctuations that are not accounted for in a smooth ﬂuid description [16]. Correlations between the ion and electron positions would provide the excess kinetic en- ergy observed in the expansion by lowering the potential energy of the plasma. This satisﬁes overall energy con- servation and it may also explain the systematically poor ﬁts of the data for high Γ e(See Fig. 2). Strong coupling is also predicted to alter the relation for the frequency fe[17], with which we extract the plasma density, size, and expansion velocity. The trend of this eﬀect agrees qualitatively with the observed devi- ation, but knowledge of the wavelength of the collective oscillation is needed for a quantitative comparison. Other possible explanations for the deviation are re- lated to how the ultracold plasma is created. The 10 ns duration of the photoionization pulse is long com- pared to the time required for electrons to move an in- terparticle spacing. Photoionization late in the pulse thus occurs in the presence of free charges, which will depress the atomic ionization threshold by ∆ EIP≈ 1 2kBTe{[(3Γ e)3/2+ 1]2/3−1}[18]. This eﬀect might in- crease the electron kinetic energy by ∆ EIPabove what has been assumed. However, as shown in Fig. 4, the cal- culated ∆ EIPis about an order of magnitude smaller than the observed eﬀect. The random potential energy of charged particles when they are created may also yield a greater electron energy than Ee[19]. High Γ e(high density and low temperature) conditions are desirable for studying the three-body recombination rate in an ultracold plasma. The theory [20] for this pro- cess was developed for high temperature, and is expected to break down in the ultracold regime [3]. Measuring or setting an upper limit for the recombination rate is not possible until the dynamics of high Γ esystems is un- derstood. We are currently studying this problem with molecular dynamics calculations. We have shown that plasma oscillations are a valuableprobe of the ion and electron density in an ultracold neu- tral plasma. This tool will facilitate future experimental studies of this novel system, such as the search for other collective modes in the plasma and further investigation of the eﬀects of correlations due to strong coupling. We thank Lee Collins for helpful discussions and Michael Lim for assistance with data analysis. S. Kulin acknowledges funding from the Alexander-von-Humboldt foundation. This work was funded by the ONR. ∗Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo UT 84602-4640. [1] L. Tonks and I. Langmuir, Phys. Rev. 33, 195 (1929). [2] T. C. Killian, S. Kulin, S. D. Bergeson, L. A. Orozco, C. Orzel, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4776 (1999). [3] Y. Hahn, Phys. Lett. A 231, 82 (1997). [4] S. Ichimaru, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 1017 (1982). [5] S. Kulin, T. C. Killian, S. D. Bergeson, L. A. Orozco, C. Orzel, and S. L. Rolston, in Non-Neutral Plasma Physics III, edited by J. J. Bollinger, R. L . Spencer, and R. C. Davidson, (AIP, New York, 1999), p. 367. [6]Metal-Insulator Transitions Revisited , edited by P. P. Ed- wards and C. N. R. Rao, (Taylor & Francis Ltd., Lon- don, 1995); G. Vitrant, J. M. Raimond, M. Gross, and S. Haroche, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 15, L49 (1982). [7] M. Walhout, H. J. L. Megens, A. Witte, and S. L. Rol- ston, Phys. Rev. A 48, R879 (1993). [8] D. Bohm and E. P. Gross, Phys. Rev. 75, 1851 (1949). [9] L. Spitzer, Jr., Physics of Fully Ionized Gases (John Wi- ley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1962), chap. 5. [10] By applying an rf pulse, we found the response time for excitation and detection of plasma oscillations to be about 1 µs. This is short compared to the width of S(t) and is probably set by the electron thermalization rate and time-of-ﬂight to the detector. [11] R. J. Goldston and P. H. Rutherford, Introduction to Plasma Physics (Institute of Physics, Philadelphia, 1995), chap. 6. [12] This equation would also describe the ballistic expans ion of a single-component cloud of noninteracting particles at temperature Te. It also preserves a Gaussian density distribution, which supports our assumption of such a distribution in the data analysis. [13] G. Manfredi, S. Mola, and M. R. Feix, Phys. Fluids B 5, 388 (1993). [14] C. Orzel, M. Walhout, U. Sterr, P. S. Julienne, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1926 (1999). [15] We expect that the ions are also strongly coupled, al- though we have no direct evidence for this. The ion- ion thermalization time, equal to that of the electrons, is short, and the low initial ion kinetic energy yields Γi>>1. Strong coupling of ions is not expected to aﬀect the experiments discussed here. [16] S. Ichimaru, Statistical Plasma Physics, Volume I 3(Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1992), chap. 7. [17] G. Kalman, K. I. Golden, and M. Minella, in Strongly Coupled Plasma Physics , edited by H. M. Van Horn, and S. Ichimaru, (University of Rochester Press, Rochester, 1993), p. 323. [18] J. C. Stewart and K. D. Pyatt, Jr., Astrophys. J. 144, 1203 (1966); M. Nantel, G. Ma, S. Gu, C. Y. Cˆ ot´ e, J. Itatani, and D. Umstadter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4442 (1998). [19] E. Eyler and P. Gould, private communication. [20] P. Mansbach, and J. Keck, Phys. Rev. 181, 275 (1969). FIG. 1. Electron signals from ultracold plasmas created by photoionization at t= 0. (a) 3 ×104atoms are photoionized andEe/kB= 540 K. Signals with and without rf ﬁeld are shown. The rf ﬁeld is applied continuously. (b) 8 ×104atoms are photoionized and Ee/kB= 26K. For each trace, the rf frequency in MHz is indicated, and the nonresonant response has been subtracted. The signals have been oﬀset for clarity and have been normalized by F2/nr. The resonant response arrives later for lower frequency, reﬂecting expansion of t he plasma. For 40MHz, nr= 2.0×107cm−3, and for 5MHz, nr= 3.1×105cm−3.FIG. 2. Expansion of the plasma for N= 5×105 photoionized atoms. The expansion is well described by ¯n=N/[4π(σ2 0+v2 0t2)]3/2. Horizontal error bars arise from uncertainty in peak arrival times in data such as Fig. 1b. Un- certainty in Nis negligible in this data set, but is signiﬁcant for smaller N. The ﬁts are consistently poor at low Ee, as in the 3.9 K data. FIG. 3. Expansion velocities, v0, found from ﬁts to data such as in Fig. 2. The initial average density, ¯ n0, varies from 6×106to 2.5×109cm−3. The solid line, v0=/radicalbig Ee/αm i, withα= 1.7, is a ﬁt to data with Ee/kB≥70 K. The be- havior of low Eedata is discussed in the text. Uncertainty inv0is typically equal to the size of the symbols. There is a 0.5 K uncertainty in Ee/kBreﬂecting uncertainty in the dye laser wavelength. Note that for Ee/kB<70 K, v0shows a systematic dependence on ¯ n0. FIG. 4. Excess expansion energy, ∆ E=miv2 0−Ee/α, rel- ative to Ee/α, as a function of Γ e, the Coulomb coupling parameter for the electrons at t= 0. The solid line results from equating ∆ Eto the predicted suppression of the atomic ionization potential in the plasma. Horizontal error bars a rise from uncertainty in Ee. Vertical error bars reﬂect uncertainty in both Eeandv0. 4
arXiv:physics/0006028v1 [physics.atom-ph] 10 Jun 2000EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) A collision-induced satellite in the Lyman βproﬁle due to H-H collisions Lyman βsatellites N.F. Allard1, J. Kielkopf2, I. Drira3, and P. Schmelcher4 1Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, D´ epartement Atomes et Mol´ ecules en Astrophysique, 92195 Meudon Principal Cedex, Fra nce CNRS Institut d’Astrophysique, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, 750 14 Paris, France email: allard@iap.fr 2Department of Physics, University of Louisville, Louisvil le, Ky 40292 U.S.A. email: john@aurora.physics.louisville.edu 3Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, D´ epartement Atomes et Mol´ ecules en Astrophysique, 92195 Meudon Principal Cedex, Fra nce email:Ikhlas.Drira@obspm.fr 4Institut f¨ ur Physikalische Chemie, Universit¨ at Heidelb erg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany email: peter@tc.pci.uni-heidelberg.de Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. We present a theoretical proﬁle of the Lyman βline of atomic hydrogen perturbed by collisions with neutral hydrogen atoms and protons. We use a general uni ﬁed theory in which the electric dipole moment varies during a collision. A collision-induced sate llite appears on Lyman β, correlated to the B′′¯B1Σ+ u−X1Σ+ gasymptotically forbidden transition of H 2. As a consequence, the appearance of the line wing between Lyman αand Lyman βis shown to be sensitive to the relative abundance of hydroge n ions and neutral atoms, and thereby to provide a temperature diag nostic for stellar atmospheres and laboratory plasmas. PACS. 32.70.Jz Line shapes, widths, and shifts – 52.25.Qt Emissio n, absorption, and scattering of ul- traviolet radiation – 95.30.Dr Atomic processes and intera ctions – 95.30.Ky Atomic and molecular data, spectra, and spectral parameters – 97.20.Rp Faint blue star s (including blue stragglers), white dwarfs, degenerate stars, nuclei of planetary nebulae 1 Introduction In Allard et al.1999 [1] we derived a classical path expres- sion for a pressure-broadened atomic spectral line shape that allows for a radiative electric dipole transition mo- ment which depends on the position of the perturbers. This factor is not included in the more usual approx- imation of Anderson & Talman 1956 [2] and Baranger 1958 [3,4]. We used this theory to study the inﬂuence of the variation of the dipole moment on the satellites present in the far wing proﬁles of the Lyman series lines of atomic hydrogen seen in stars and in laboratory plasmas. Satellite features at 1600 ˚A and 1405 ˚A in the Lyman α wing associated with free-free quasi-molecular transitio ns of H2and H+ 2have been observed in ultraviolet (UV) spec- tra of certain stars obtained with the International Ultra- violet Explorer (IUE) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) [5,6,7,8]. The stars which show Lyman αsatellites are DA white dwarfs, old Horizontal Branch stars of spec- tral type A, and the λBootis stars. The last two have Send oﬀprint requests to : N.F. Allardthe distinctive property of poor metal content, that is, low abundances of elements other than H and He. Satel- lites also have been observed in the laboratory spectra of laser-produced hydrogen plasmas [9,10]. Satellite features in hydrogen lines are not limited to Lymanα, which is the only Lyman-series line accessible to IUE as well as HST. Observations with HUT (Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope) and with ORFEUS (Orbiting Re- trievable Far and Extreme Ultraviolet Spectrograph) of Lymanβof DA white dwarfs with T eﬀclose to 20000 K have revealed a line shape very diﬀerent from the expected simple Stark broadening, with line satellites near 1078 and 1060˚A [11,12]. The satellites in the red wing of Lyman β are in the 905 to 1187 ˚A spectral region covered by the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE) launched in June 1999. Furthermore, Lyman βproﬁles are also the subject of an ongoing study of the far ultraviolet spectrum of dense hydrogen plasmas. The strengths of these satel- lite features and indeed the entire shape of wings in the Lyman series are very sensitive to the degree of ionization in the stellar atmosphere and laboratory plasmas, because2 N.F. Allard et al.: A collision-induced satellite in the Ly manβproﬁle due to H-H collisions that determines the relative importance of broadening by ion and neutral collisions. In a previous work [13] we presented theoretical pro- ﬁles of Lyman βperturbed solely by protons. The calcula- tions were based on the accurate theoretical H+ 2molecular potentials of Madsen and Peek [14] to describe the inter- action between radiator and perturber, and dipole transi- tion moments of Ramaker and Peek [15]. The line proﬁles were included as a source of opacity in model atmospheres for hot white dwarfs, and the predicted spectra compared very well with the observed ORFEUS spectra [12]. The very recent ab initio calculations of Drira 1999 [16] of electronic transition moments for excited states of the H2molecule and very accurate molecular potentials of Schmelcher [17,18] now allow us to compute Lyman βpro- ﬁles simultaneously perturbed by neutral atomic hydrogen and by protons. The aim of our paper is to point out a collision-induced satellite correlated to the B′′¯B1Σ+ u− X1Σ+ gasymptotically forbidden transition of H 2. We show that the shape of the wing in the region between Lyman β and Lyman αis particularly sensitive to the relative abun- dance of the neutral and ion perturbers responsible for the broadening of the lines. 2 Theory The classical path theory for the shape of pressure-broaden ed atomic spectral lines which takes into account the varia- tion of the electric dipole moment during a collision is only brieﬂy outlined here. The theory has been described in detail in [1]. Our approach is based on the quantum theory of spectral line shapes of Baranger [3,4] developed in an adiabatic representation to include the degeneracy of atomic levels [19,20,21]. 2.1 General expression for the spectrum in an adiabatic representation The spectrum I(ω) can be written as the Fourier trans- form of the dipole autocorrelation function Φ(s), I(ω) =1 πRe/integraldisplay+∞ 0Φ(s)e−iωsds. (1) Here, Φ(s) =TrρD†eisH ¯hDe−isH ¯h (2) =/angbracketleftD†(0)D(s)/angbracketright (3) is the autocorrelation function of D(s) , the dipole mo- ment of the radiator in the Heisenberg representation (we use bold notation for operators) [22]. His the total Hamil- tonian H=Tnucl+Telec+V(x,R), (4) where TnuclandTelecare sums of nuclear and electronic kinetic energy operators respectively, and V(x,R) is the interaction between particles. Here xdenotes collectivelythe set of electronic coordinates (position and spin) plus spin coordinates of the nuclei, while Rdenotes the set of position coordinates of the nuclei. We assume that the radiating atom is immersed in a perturber bath in thermal equilibrium. The density matrix ρis ρ≡e−βH Tre−βH, (5) whereβis the inverse temperature (1 /kT). We use the notation /angbracketleft( )/angbracketright ≡Trρ( ), (6) where Trdenotes the trace operation. The adiabatic or Born-Oppenheimer representation com- prises expanding states of the gas in terms of electronic statesχe(x;R) corresponding to frozen nuclear conﬁgura- tions. In the Schr¨ odinger equation (Telec+V(x,R))χe(x;R) =Helec(R)χe(x;R) (7) =Ee(R)χe(x;R).(8) Rappears as a parameter, and the eigenenergies Ee(R) play the role of potential energies for the nuclei. Any total wave function Ψ(x,R) can be expanded as Ψ(x,R) =/summationdisplay eψe(R)χe(x;R). (9) As the nuclei get far from each other, which we denote byR→ ∞ , the electronic energies Ee(R) tend to asymp- totic values E∞ ewhich are sums of individual atomic ener- gies. Since atomic states are usually degenerate, there are in general several diﬀerent energy surfaces which tend to a same asymptotic energy as R→ ∞ . We will consider speciﬁcally a single radiating atom, the radiator , immersed in a gas of optically inactive atoms, the perturbers . For a transitionα= (i,f) from initial state ito ﬁnal state f, we haveR-dependent frequencies ωe′e(R)≡(Ee′(R)−Ee(R))/¯h, e ∈εi, e′∈εf(10) which tend to the isolated radiator frequency ωα≡ωfi≡(E∞ f−E∞ i)/¯h (11) as the perturbers get suﬃciently far from the radiator: ωe′e(R)→ωfiasR→ ∞, e ∈εi, e′∈εf.(12) Let us introduce projectors Pewhich select the ethadia- batic component of any Ψ(x,R) according to [20] PeΨ(x,R) =ψe(R)χe(x;R). (13) We write the dipole moment as a sum over transitions D=/summationdisplay αDα, (14) Dα≡/summationdisplay e,e′(α)Pe′DPe. (15)N.F. Allard et al.: A collision-induced satellite in the Lym anβproﬁle due to H-H collisions 3 In the Heisenberg representation Dα(t)≡/summationdisplay e,e′(α)eitH ¯hPe′DPee−itH ¯h, (16) ≡/summationdisplay e,e′(α)De′e(t). (17) The sum/summationtext(α) e,e′is over all pairs ( e,e′) such thatωe′,e(R)→ωα asR→ ∞. Thus Dαconnects all pairs of adiabatic states whose electronic energy diﬀerences become equal to ωαas R→ ∞. In the absence of perturbers, Dαwould be the component of Dresponsible for the radiative transitions of frequency ωα. We note that the projection operators account for the weighting factors discussed in Ref. [21]. Introducing the expansion Eq. (14) for Dinto the ex- pression Eq. (3) for Φ(s), we obtain Φ(s) =/summationdisplay α,βΦα,β(s) (18) where Φα,β(s) =TrρD† αeisH ¯hDβe−isH ¯h (19) =/angbracketleftD† α(0)Dβ(s)/angbracketright. (20) The line shape is then I(ω) =/summationdisplay α,βIα,β(ω). (21) The termsIα,β(ω) ,α/negationslash=β, represent interference between diﬀerent spectral lines [4]. When these interference terms are neglected, we get I(ω) =/summationdisplay αIα(ω) (22) and Φ(s) =/summationdisplay αΦα(s) (23) where Φα(s) =/angbracketleftD† α(0)Dα(s)/angbracketright. (24) The time dependence of Φα(s) is determined by Dα(s), the part of the dipole moment which, in the absence of perturbers, oscillates at the frequency ωα. Let us now de- note dα(s)≡Dα(s)e−iωαs(25) wherein the free evolution e−iωαsis factored out. For an isolated line, such as Lyman α, we have shown (Allard et al. [1]) that the normalized line shape Jα(∆ω), in the uncorrelated perturbers approximation, is given by Jα(∆ω) =FT[engα(s)] (26) In the classical path approximation, where we assume that the perturber follows a rectilinear trajectory at a singlemean velocity ¯ v, we get from [21,1] that gα(s) can be writ- ten as gα(s) =1/summationtext e,e′(α)\|dee′\|2/summationdisplay e,e′(α) /integraldisplay+∞ 02πρdρ/integraldisplay+∞ −∞dx˜dee′[r(0)] [ei ¯h/integraltexts 0dt Ve′e[r(t)]˜d∗ee′[r(s)]−˜dee′[r(0)] ].(27) The separation of the radiator and perturber is r(t) = [ρ2+ (x+ ¯vt)2]1/2withρthe impact parameter of the perturber trajectory and xis the position of the perturber along its trajectory at time t= 0. The total line strength of the transition is/summationtext e,e′(α)\|dee′\|2. The potential energy for a state eis Ve[r(t)] =Ee[r(t)]−E∞ e; (28) the diﬀerence potential is Ve′e[r(t)] =Ve′[r(t)]−Ve[r(t)] ; (29) and we deﬁned a modulated dipole [1] ˜dee′[r(t)] =dee′[r(t)]e−β 2Ve[r(t)], (30) where we denoted dee′(r) =/angbracketleftχe(r)\|d\|χe′(r)/angbracketright. (31) In the above, we neglected the inﬂuence of the potentials Ve(r) andVe′(r) on the perturber trajectories, which re- main straight lines. Although we should drop the Boltz- mann factor e−βVe(r)for consistency with our straight tra- jectory approximation, by keeping it we improve the result in the wings. Note that over regions where Ve(r)<0, the factore−βVe(r)accounts for bound states of the radiator- perturber pair, but in a classical approximation wherein the discrete bound states are replaced by a continuum; thus any band structure is smeared out. 3 Theoretical analysis 3.1 Formation of line satellites Close collisions between a radiating atom and a perturber are responsible for transient quasi-molecules which may lead to the appearance of satellite features in the wing of an atomic line proﬁle. When the diﬀerence ∆V(R) between the upper and lower interatomic potentials for a given transition goes through an extremum, a relatively wider range of inter- atomic distances contribute to the same spectral frequency , resulting in an enhancement, or satellite , in the line wing. The uniﬁed theory [2,22] predicts that there will be satel- lites centered periodically at frequencies corresponding to the extrema of the diﬀerence potential between the upper and lower states, ∆ω=k∆Vext,(k= 1,2,...) [23,24,25]. Here∆ωis the frequency diﬀerence between the center of the unperturbed spectral line and the satellite feature, measured for convenience in the same units as the poten- tial energy diﬀerence. This series of satellites is due to many-body interactions.4 N.F. Allard et al.: A collision-induced satellite in the Ly manβproﬁle due to H-H collisions 3.2 Diatomic potentials The adiabatic interaction of the neutral hydrogen atom with a proton or another hydrogen atom is described by potential energies Ve(R) for each electronic state of the H+ 2or H 2molecule (Rdenotes the internuclear distance between the radiator and the perturber). For H-H+col- lisions we have used the potentials of H+ 2calculated by Madsen and Peek [14]. For H-H collisions we have used the potentials of H 2calculated by Schmelcher [17]. In Fig. 1 we have plotted the H 2potential diﬀerences ∆V(R) for the singlet states which contribute to Lyman β. We have used letters here to label the states. B3 is the well known B′′¯B1Σ+ ustate. At small internuclear separation, R, the state correlates with the B′′1Σ+ ustate, the third 1Σ+ ustate of the Rydberg series. At larger internuclear separation the state has an ionic character until R= 19˚A where the potential energy curve of the H++ H−(1s)2 state crosses the H( n= 1) + H(n= 3) energy levels, be- cause of an avoid crossing ¯Blooses its ionic character. Dabrowski and Herzberg [26] predicted the existence of the¯B, the ﬁrst calculations were done by Kolos [27,28]. More recent calculations are reported in [18,29]. We use B4 and B5 respectively to label the 41Σ+ uand 51Σ+ ustates, and V and D to label the 31Πuand 21Πu states. Each diﬀerence potential exhibits at least one extremum which, in principle, leads to a corresponding satellite fea - ture in the wing of Lyman β(see Sect. 3.1). The present approach now allows us also to take into account the asymptotically forbidden transitions of quasi-molecular hy- drogen which dissociate into (1s,3s) and (1s,3d) atoms. The satellite amplitude depends on the value of the dipole moment through the region of the potential extremum re- sponsible of the satellite and on the position of this ex- tremum. We have shown [1,13,30] that a large enhance- ment in the amplitude of a spectral line satellite occurs whenever the dipole moment increases through the region of internuclear distance where the satellite is formed. The potential diﬀerences of the B3-X and B4-X tran- sitions exhibit double wells. The maximum at 3.0 ˚A of the B3-X potential and minimum of the B4-X potential are due to an avoided-crossing. The most signiﬁcant characteristic of Fig. 1 is the exis- tence of the deep outer well at 6 ˚A of the B3-X potential. The ionic interaction decays slowly making the potential energy diﬀerence very broad compared to the very steep wells of the other transitions. This is very important as the position of the extremum and the functional depen- dence of the potential diﬀerence on internuclear separatio n determine the amplitude and shape of the satellites [21]. 3.3 Electronic transition dipole moments The dipole moment taken between the initial and ﬁnal states of a radiative transition determines the transition probability, but for two atoms in collision, the moment depends on their separation. This modiﬁes relative contri- butions to the proﬁle along the collision trajectory. Dipol emoments for H+ 2and H 2, calculated as a function of inter- nuclear distance respectively by Ramaker and Peek [15] and by Drira [16], were used for the transitions contribut- ing to Lyman αand Lyman β. For Lyman β, the four com- ponents which correspond to 1 s−3patomic transitions are dipole allowed [16]: the two singlet B4-X and D-X tran- sitions, and the two triplet 43Σ+ g-3Σ+ uand 23Πg-3Σ+ u transitions . If electronic states iandfof an isolated radiator are not connected by the dipole moment operator, that is ifDif(R→ ∞) = 0, allowed radiative transitions can- not occur between these two states. This happens for the other transitions which correspond to 1 s−3sand 1s−3d atomic transitions. Although these transitions should not contribute to the unperturbed line proﬁle, Dif(R) may diﬀer from zero when a perturber passes close to the radi- ator. In this instance radiative transitions are induced by collisions, but not at the unperturbed line frequency. It often arises that an extremum in the potential dif- ference occurs when the ﬁnal (or initial) potential en- ergy curve exhibits an avoided crossing, the corresponding wavefunctions exchange their characteristics and the ra- diative dipole transition moment varies dramatically with R. This is exactly what happens for the B3-X transition. To point out the importance of variation of dipole moment on the formation of a collision-induced (CI) satellite, we have displayed in Fig. 2 D(R) together with the corre- sponding∆V(R) for theB3−Xasymptotically forbidden transition. The dipole transition is extremely small for th e isolated radiating atom ( R→ ∞ ) but it goes through a maximum at the value of Rwhere the avoid-crossing oc- curs and remains quite important at the internuclear dis- tance where the potential diﬀerence of the outer well goes through a minimum. In such a case we expect a contribution from this tran- sition in the wing and the formation of a CI line satellite, if it is not smeared out by larger dipole-allowed contribu- tions. 4 Lyman βproﬁle The Lyman proﬁles and satellites shown here are calcu- lated at the low densities met in the atmospheres of stars. The typical particle densities from 1015to 1017cm−3al- lows us to use an expansion of the autocorrelation function in powers of density as described in [21,31]. Line proﬁles are normalized so that over ωthey integrate to 1. 4.1 Collisional proﬁle perturbed by neutral H We will consider the two following mechanisms which con- tribute to the Lyman βwing. –The far wing of allowed dipole lines, due to the free-free transition in a pair of colliding atoms. –The collision-induced absorption due to the free-free transition involving the transient dipole moment ex- isting during a binary collision.N.F. Allard et al.: A collision-induced satellite in the Lym anβproﬁle due to H-H collisions 5 0 2 4 6810 12 14 1618 20 R (Å)−12000−10000−8000−6000−4000−2000020004000∆V (cm−1) B3−X B4−X B5−X D−X V−X Fig. 1. Diﬀerence potential energies expressed in cm−1for the singlet states of H 2contributing to Lyman beta. The line proﬁle calculation shown Fig. 3 has been done at a temperature of 10000 K for a perturber density of 1016cm−3of neutral hydrogen. The only line feature is a broad CI satellite situated at 1150 ˚A in the far wing, due to the B3-X dipole forbidden transition. Normally such an eﬀect would be overshadowed by the allowed transition wing, but in this case there is no large contribution of the dipole allowed transitions in this region, as can be easily predicted by the examination of Fig. 1. The extrema of the allowed B4-X and D-X transitions occur for very short distances, and are much smaller compared to the position and depth of the outer well in the B3-X transition (see Sect. 3.1 and 3.2). The collision-induced absorption depends on the inter- nuclear separation and produces very broad spectral lines with a characteristic width of the order of the inverse of the duration of the close collision. It is strongly dependen t on –the temperature –the amplitude of the dipole for Rminwhen the potential diﬀerence presents a minimum.This emphasizes the importance of the accuracy of both the potential energies andthe dipole moments for the line shape calculations. Oscillatory structures appear near the 1150 ˚A satellite as they appear between the line and the 1600 ˚A satellite in both theory and experiment [1]. These oscillations were predicted by Royer [32] and Sando et al. [33,34]. 4.2 Simultaneous perturbations by H and H+ The complete Lyman βproﬁle perturbed by collisions with neutral hydrogen and protons is shown in Fig 3. We notice that the collision-induced H-H satellite is much broader than the allowed H-H+satellite since the dipole moment diﬀers from zero only over a short range of internuclear distances (see Sect. 4.1). The CI satellite of Lyman βis quite far from the unperturbed Lyman βline center, actu- ally closer to the Lyman αline. It is therefore necessary to take into proper account the total contribution of both the Lymanαand Lyman βwings of H perturbed simultane- ously by neutrals and protons and to study the variation6 N.F. Allard et al.: A collision-induced satellite in the Ly manβproﬁle due to H-H collisions 0 2 4 6810 12 14 1618 20 R (Å)−12000−10000−8000−6000−4000−2000020004000∆V (cm−1) 0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.80 D(R) (au) D(R)∆VLyman β B3−X Fig. 2. Diﬀerence potential energy ∆Vin cm−1and the corresponding D(R) in atomic units for the dipole forbidden B3-X transition which gives the CI satellite of Lyman β. of this part of the Lyman series with the relative density of ionized and neutral atoms. In [1] we evaluated both the Lyman αand Lyman β wings of H perturbed by protons. However, we neglected interference terms between the two lines. Equation (51) of [1], which gives the proﬁle for a pair of lines such as Lymanαandβ, is I(ω) =φ(0) αenfα(0)Jα(ω−ωα) +φ(0) βenfβ(0)Jβ(ω−ωβ). (32) The perturbed line strength φ(0) αenfα(0)diﬀers from the freeline strength φ(0) αby the factor enfα(0). This density- dependent factor expresses the fact that the total intensit y radiated increases or decreases when the dipole moment is increased or decreased, on average, by the proximity of perturbers. Because of the low densities we consider, we have neglected this factor here. We show the sum of the proﬁles of Lyman αand Ly- manβin Fig. 4. We can see that a ratio of 5 between the neutral and proton density is enough to make the CIsatellite appear in the far wing. The CI satellite appear- ance is then very sensitive to the degree of ionization and may be used as a temperature diagnostic. 5 Conclusions In the case of Lyman αand the H-H+Lymanβsatellites, the potential shape played a dominant role in the large diﬀerence in the broadening of the quasi-molecular fea- tures [30]. The width of the collision-induced absorption is determined, for the most part, by the short range over which the corresponding transition dipole moment is sig- niﬁcant. In the CI satellite, it is the dipole moment which is very important and which is responsible of the shape of the satellite, the observation of such a satellite would be a test of the accuracy of the dipole moment calculation. Satellites due to allowed and forbidden transitions depend linearly on density. The CI satellite is very sensitive to th e temperature of the absorption, and it may also be used as a diagnostic tool for temperature. We emphasize that theN.F. Allard et al.: A collision-induced satellite in the Lym anβproﬁle due to H-H collisions 7 97510001025 1050 1075 11001125 1150 1175 1200 λ (Å)10−2210−2110−2010−1910−1810−17I(ω)H−H+ H−H~ Fig. 3. Line proﬁle of Lyman βperturbed by neutral hydrogen and protons. The dashed line ( −−−) shows only the contribution from neutral perturbers. eﬀect of ﬁnite collision duration does play a role in the shape of the far wing. The present calculations are done in an adiabatic approximation using a rectilinear trajec- tory. This should aﬀect slightly the shape of the satellite, although no great error is expected. We are developing methods to include trajectory eﬀects in the evaluation of the line shape. Acknowledgements The computations of dipole transition moments were per- formed on the CRAY of the computer center IDRIS. The work at the University of Louisville is supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Chemical Sciences, Oﬃce of Basic Energy Sciences, Oﬃce of Energy Research. References1. N.F. Allard, A. Royer, J.F. Kielkopf, N. Feautrier, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1021 (1999). 2. P.W. Anderson, J.D. Talman , Bell System Technical Pub- lication No. 3117 (Murray Hill, NJ, 29 1956). 3. M. Baranger, Phys. Rev. 111, 481 (1958). 4. M. Baranger, Phys. Rev. 111, 494 (1958). 5. D. Koester, N.F. Allard, in White Dwarfs: Advances in Ob- servation and Theory , edited by M. Barstow (Kluwer, Dor- drecht,1993), p. 237. 6. D. Koester, N.F. Allard, G. Vauclair, Astron. Astrophys. 291, L9 (1994). 7. H. Holweger, D. Koester, N.F. Allard, Astron. Astrophys. 290, L21 (1994) 8. P. Bergeron, F. Wesemael, R. Lamontagne, G. Fontaine, R. Saﬀer, N.F. Allard, Astrophys. J. 449, 258 (1995). 9. J.F. Kielkopf, N.F. Allard, Astrophys. J. 450, L75 (1995). 10. J.F. Kielkopf, N.F. Allard, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4416 (1998). 11. D. Koester, D.S. Finley, N.F. Allard, J.W. Kruk, R.A. Kimble, Astrophys. J. 463, L93 (1996). 12. D. Koester, U. Sperhake, N.F. Allard, D.S. Finley, S. Jor - dan, Astron. Astrophys. 336, 276 (1998). 13. N.F. Allard, J.F. Kielkopf, N. Feautrier, Astron. Astro phy. 330, 782 (1998).8 N.F. Allard et al.: A collision-induced satellite in the Ly manβproﬁle due to H-H collisions 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 λ (Å)10−2210−2110−2010−1910−1810−17I(ω)NH=1x1016 NH=5x1016 NH=1x1017 NH+=1x1016 Fig. 4. Total proﬁle of Lyman αand Lyman βperturbed by neutral hydrogen and protons. Three diﬀerent n eutral densities (1×1016, 5×1016, 1×1017cm−3) are compared for a ﬁxed ion density (1 ×1016cm−3). 14. Madsen M.M., Peek J.M., Atomic Data 2, 1971, 171. 15. Ramaker D.E., Peek J.M., J. Phys. B 5, 1972, 2175. 16. Drira, I., J. Mol. Spectroscopy 198, 52 (1999). 17. Schmelcher, P., private communication. 18. T. Detmer, P. Schmelcher, L.S. Cederbaum, J. Chem. Phys.109, 9694 (1998). 19. A. Royer, Can. J. Phys. 52, 1816 (1974). 20. A. Royer, Phys. Rev. A 22, 1625 (1980). 21. N.F. Allard, D. Koester, Feautrier N., Spielﬁedel A., As - tron. Astrophy. Suppl. Ser. 108, 417 (1994). 22. N.F. Allard, J. Kielkopf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 1103 (1982). 23. N.F. Allard, J. Phys. B 11, 1383 (1978). 24. A. Royer, Acta Phys. Pol. A 54, 805 (1978). 25. J.F. Kielkopf, N.F. Allard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 3 (1979). 26. I. Dabrowski, G. Herzberg, Can. J. Phys. 54, 525 (1976). 27. W. Kolos, J. Mol. Spectroscopy 62, 429 (1976). 28. W. Kolos, J. Mol. Spectroscopy 86, 420 (1981). 29. Reinhold E., Hogervorst W., Ubachs W., Wolniewicz L. , Phys. Rev. A 60, 1258 (1999) 30. N.F. Allard, I. Drira, M. Gerbaldi, J.F. Kielkopf, A. Spielﬁedel, Astron. Astophys. 335, 1124 (1998). 31. A. Royer, Phys. Rev. A 3, 2044 (1971). 32. A. Royer, Phys. Rev. A, 43, 499 (1971).33. Sando K.M., Doyle R.O., Dalgarno A., Astrophys. J. 157, L143 (1969). 34. Sando K.M., Wormhoudt J.G., Phys. Rev. A 7, 1889 (1973).
arXiv:physics/0006029v1 [physics.gen-ph] 10 Jun 2000The Theory of Gravitation in the Space - Time with Fractal Dim ensions and Modiﬁed Lorents Transformations L.Ya.Kobelev Department of Physics, Urals State University Av. Lenina, 51, Ekaterinburg 620083, Russia E-mail: leonid.kobelev@usu.ru In the space and the time with a fractional dimensions the Lor ents transformations fulﬁll only as a good approach and become exact only when dimensions are int eger. So the principle of relativity (it is exact when dimensions are integer) may be treated also as a good approximation and may remain valid ( but modiﬁed ) in case of small fractional corre ctions to integer dimensions of time and space. In this paper presented the gravitation ﬁeld theory i n the fractal time and space (based on the fractal theory of time and space developed by author early). In the theory are taken into account the alteration of Lorents transformations for case including v=cand are described the real gravitational ﬁelds with spin equal 2 in the fractal time deﬁned on the Riema nn or Minkowski measure carrier. In the theory introduced the new ”quasi-spin”, given four eq uations for gravitational ﬁelds (with diﬀerent ”quasi spins” and real and imaginary energies). Fo r integer dimensions the theory coincide with Einstein GR or Logunov- Mestvirichvili gravitation th eory. 01.30.Tt, 05.45, 64.60.A; 00.89.98.02.90.+p. I. INTRODUCTION The general relativity theory (GR) [1] is one of the most known and used the theories of gravitation ﬁeld. It is elegant, beautiful from physical point of view and ex- plains all experimental facts (truly, it must be point out that others gravitational theories explain them too, as example see [2]). The one of the known lacks of the GR consists in impossibility to include other physical ﬁelds (except gravitation ﬁeld) in the frame of GR, i.e. in im- possibility to look on other ﬁelds as on the characteris- tics of metric of Riemann geometry. The equations of GR based on assumption that all systems of frame are equivalent, the absolute systems of references are absent thou the space and the time in the presence of gravita- tional ﬁelds are inhomogeneous. In the fractal theory of time and space ( see [3]- [16]) all the physical ﬁelds are included in the fractional dimensions of the time and the space, the time and the space ﬁelds are real ﬁelds and any system of frames are an absolute system of frame, the Lorents transformations and known physical laws ful- ﬁlled as not rigorously laws and are only very good ap- proach for describing characteristics of the time and the space. For the case when fractional corrections to integer dimensions are small all the equations of the fractal the- ory practically coincide with equations of known physical theories or may give only non-suﬃcient corrections. Here we present the theory for the ﬁelds with spin equal two in the fractal time and space on the base of the equa- tions given in [3], [4], [14] ( in the paper [14] used the modiﬁed Lorents transformations with corrections given by the fractal theory of time for moving with speed of light( [5]- [6]) for constructing the theories of scalar, ve c- tor and spinor ﬁeld). The equation of this theory diﬀersfrom equations of the theories [12], [3] because the mod- iﬁed Lorents transformations give four systems of grav- itational equations for four diﬀerent gravitational ﬁelds (two with real energies and two with imaginary energies) instead of only one system in theories [1], [2]. II. GENERALIZED FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVES Following [3]- [4], we will consider both time and space as the initial real material ﬁelds existing in the world and generating all other physical ﬁelds by means of their frac- tional dimensions. For the gravitational ﬁelds equations construction may be used the principle of minimum frac- tal dimensions functional as it was made in [3]- [4]. The aim of the paper is to include (in addition to Lagrangians used in [3], [4]) in Lagrangians of ﬁelds the additional members that give corrections to Lorents transformations [5], [6], [14] in the domain of velocities v≃c. For de- scribing the functions deﬁned on multifractal sets it is necessary to introduce the generalized fractional deriva- tives (see [5], [6], [9]). Therefore, we introduce as in the cited papers the integral functionals (both left-sided and right-sided) which are suitable to describe the dynamics of functions deﬁned on multifractal sets of time and space (generalized fractional derivatives (GFD), see [3]- [4], [ 9]) and replace by GFD the usual derivatives and integral respect to time and space coordinates in the fractional dimensions functional. These functionals GFD are sim- ple and natural generalization of the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives and integrals: Dd +,tf(t) =/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayt af(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t−t′)d(t′)−n+1(1) 1Dd −,tf(t) = (−1)n/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayb tf(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t′−t)d(t′)−n+1 (2) where Γ( x) is Euler’s gamma function, and aandbare some constants from [0 ,∞). In these deﬁnitions, as usu- ally,n={d}+ 1 ,where {d}is the integer part of dif d≥0 (i.e. n−1≤d < n ) and n= 0 for d <0. If d=const, the generalized fractional derivatives (GFD) (1)-(2) coincide with the Riemann - Liouville fractional derivatives ( d≥0) or fractional integrals ( d <0). When d=n+ε(t), ε(t)→0, GFD can be represented by means of integer derivatives and integrals. There are relations between GFD and ordinary derivatives for dαnear in- teger values. If dα→nwhere nis an integer , ( for example dα=1 + ε(r,(t), t),α=r, t), in that case it is possible represent GFD by approximate relations (see [3], [9]) D1+ǫ +,xαf(r(t), t) =∂ ∂xαf(r(t), t) +∂ ∂xα[ε(r(t), t)f(r(t), t)] (3) Forn= 1, i.e. d= 1+ ε,\|ε\|<<1 it is possible to obtain: D1+ε +,tf(t)≈∂ ∂tf(t) +a∂ ∂t[ε(r(t), t)f(t)] (4) where ais constant and deﬁned by the choice of the rules of regularization of integrals (1)-(2) (for more detail see [3], [4], [9]). The selection of the rule of regularization that gives a real additives for usual derivative in (3) yield a= 0.5 for d <1 and a= 1.077 for d >1 [3]. The functions under integral sign in (1)-(2) we consider as the generalized functions deﬁned on the set of the ﬁnite functions [18]. The notions of GFD, similar to (1)-(2), also deﬁned and for the space variables r. In the deﬁnitions of GFD (1)-(2) the connections between fractal dimensions of time dt(r(t), t) and characteristics of physical ﬁelds (say, potentials Φ i(r(t), t), i= 1,2, ..) or densities of Lagrangians Li) are determined, following [3], by the relation dt(r(t), t) = 1 +/summationdisplay iβiLi(Φi(r(t), t)) (5) where Liare densities of energy of physical ﬁelds, βiare dimensional constants with physical dimension of [ Li]−1 (it is worth to choose β′ iin the form β′ i=a−1βifor the sake of independence from regularization constant). The deﬁnition of time as the system of subsets and deﬁni- tion the FD d(see ( 5)) connects the value of fractional (fractal) dimension dt(r(t), t) with each time instant t. Thus dtdepends both on time tand coordinates r. If dt= 1 (the absence of physical ﬁelds) the set of time has topological dimension equal to unity. The multifractal model of time allows, as will be shown early ( [5], [6]) , to consider the divergence of energy of masses movingwith speed of light in the special relativity theory as the result of the requirement of rigorous validity of the con- servation laws in the presence of physical ﬁelds that is valid only for closed systems. In our theory there are an approximate fulﬁllment of conservation laws as in the fractal theory of time and space the Universe is treated as an open system deﬁned on the measure carrier (the closed system is the Universe together with the measure carrier). The gravitational equations may be received by using the principle of minimum to functional of fractal dimensions with dependencies of GFD ( [3], [4]) or by replacing the ordinary derivatives in proper physical equations by GFD ( [12]) (the results will be the same). In this paper we generalize the theory of gravitational ﬁelds [3], [4], [12] by including in the equations received in these papers the results of paper [14] that took into account the modiﬁed Lorents transformations. III. THE BASED EQUATIONS FOR PHYSICAL FIELDS WITH SPIN EQUAL TWO For generalization of the gravitational ﬁeld theory pre- sented in [3], [4] by means of construction the equations in the fractal time and space with modiﬁed Lorents trans- formations we write at ﬁrst the ﬁeld equations for scalar function Φ of paper [14] (22−4a2 0∂4 ∂t4)Φ(r, t) =E4 0Φ(r, t) (6) where 2is D’Alamber operator ( 2= ∆−∂2 ∂t2, ∆ is Laplasian), Φ are functions describing particles or ﬁelds. For scalar Φ equation (6) describes the scalar ﬁeld in the space with fractal dimensions of time that originate the all physical ﬁelds ( a0/ne}ationslash= 0) . The corrections in (6) to the usual D’Alamber equation are the result of modifying the Lorentz transformations. The last is consequences of fractal nature of time. Now we may write the equations with taken into account both phenomenon: the inﬂuences of multifractal structure of time ( use in the equations the generalized Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative s (GFD) instead of ordinary derivatives) and corrections to equations from modiﬁed Lorents transformations re- ceived in [14]. In that case the equation (6) take the form (Ddt −,tDdt +,t−∆)2Φ(r, t) = [E4 0+ + 4a2 0(Ddt −,tDdt +,t)2]Φ(r, t) (7) where functionals Dd +,tandDd −,tdeﬁned by (1), (2) and (5). It is useful to receive from these equations of the fourth order (7) the four equations of the second order. It is possible if use the Dirac type four-component matrices αiwhere ( i= 1,2,3,4) :αiαj+αjαi=δij. Than we have four equations of second order for the ﬁelds both 2with real energies (two equations) and with imaginary energies (two equations): (Ddt −,tDdt +,t−∆)IΦi(r, t) = [α1E2 0+ + 2a0α2(Ddt −,tDdt +,t)]Φi(r, t) (8) where α1andα2may be chosen as in [14] α1= 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0−1 0 0 0 0 −1 , α 2= 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0  andIis the 4-component unit matrix. This situation is the same as for vector, spinor or Proca ﬁelds described in the [14]. IV. THE SELECTION OF THE MODELS OF GRAVITY The generalization of gravitational theory in fractal space on the base of equations (8) is possible by using the two models of describing the gravity ﬁelds : a) The ﬁrst model based on Einstein representations the space-time as the continuous set of points described by Riemannian geometry. In that case in the fractal theory of time and space the measure carrier must be deﬁned as the Riemannian sets with integer dimensions. On this sets we construct the fractal sets of time and space with dimensions deﬁned by Lagrangians densities of energy for all physical ﬁelds (see (5) ). On the fractal sets the laws of physics will broken because of the sets of space and time become the open systems (see statistical theory of open system in [ ?] ) connected with the measure carrier. An arbitrary theories for any physical ﬁelds will include (in the fractal space) the inﬂuences of Riemannian geom- etry because of Riemannian carrier of measure. So the Riemannian geometry of ﬁelds will be not consequences of characteristics of ﬁelds (for example, gravitational ﬁe ld with spin equal two), but characteristics of measure car- rier. In that case we may describe the gravitational ﬁeld (if take into account the inﬂuences of all physical ﬁelds on behaviour of gravitational ﬁeld) by using the principle of minimum of fractal dimensions functional and Euler equations with generalized fractional derivatives (GFD) as we introduced in the equations of paper [3], [4], [12]. In this model it is necessary to use the covariant deriva- tives in the fractal Riemannian time-space as it was made in [3], [12] and improve them by introducing the four equations for the gravitational ﬁeld tensor Φµνand in- troducing the corrections from modiﬁed Lorents trans- formations (the introducing of the last corrections was demonstrated above). In that case the new gravitational equations will describe four ﬁelds: the two gravitational ﬁelds with real energies (if use the analogy with Diractheory these ﬁelds may have diﬀerent sign of the grav- itational charges) and the two gravitational ﬁelds with imaginary energies . All these ﬁelds exist in the Riemann time-space with fractal dimensions. In the case of inte- ger dimensions of time and space the received equations (and the theory) coincide with equations of ordinary GR. In this paper we consider also the another gravity model with more analogy to Logunov-Mestvirichvili model of gravity [2]. b) The second model for describing the gravitation ﬁelds in the fractal time and space ( by GFD using ) consists in the selection of other the measure carrier. The selec- tion the measure carrier is: the measure carrier selected as the ﬂat four-dimensions pseudo Euclidean Minkowski time-space. Our fractal Universe in that case deﬁned as the multifractal sets on the pseudo Euclidean Minkowski time-space ( the model of a measure carrier selection in the case a) was the model of Riemannian time-space). Let us select (as a base) the system of reference which coincide for FD equal to unit with Cartesian system of reference (we remind that in the fractal theory of time and space there are only an absolute systems of reference but if FD of time and space near integer the principle of equivalence of all reference systems is valid with grate ex- actness ). The equations of the gravitation ﬁelds in that case will be similar to the equations of the theory [2] in which all derivatives replaced on GFD and metric tensor γµνare contained the functions (functionals) originated by fractional dimensions (i.e. it must be the function ofLwhere Lis Lagrangians energy densities of gravita- tion ﬁelds). Beside these corrections must be taken into account the corrections (the main corrections) from mod- ifying of Lorents transformations and the presence as re- sult of it of four sorts of the gravitational ﬁelds (two with real and two with imaginary energies). The diﬀerences the theory of gravitation based on above statements from the theory [2] in that case are: 1) the real gravitational ﬁelds in the theory originated by fractional dimensions of time, but not postulated as in [2]; 2) the ordinary deriva- tives replaced by GFD for taking into account the FD of time; 3) we took into account also the modiﬁcation of Lorents transformations for time with fractional dimen- sions; 4) the time-space is fractal and only the measure carrier is Minkowski time-space with integer dimensions.. V. THE GRAVITATIONAL EQUATIONS DEFINED ON MINKOWSKI TIME-SPACE MEASURE CARRIER It is convenient to use the designations of the theory [2] for the equations construction of gravitation fractal the- ory in the multifractal Universe deﬁned on the pseudo Euclidean Minkowski time-space (this space may have any dimensions but integer). The equations for gravita- tion ﬁeld tensor ˜Φµν=√−γ·Φµν(γ=det(γµν),˜tµν= 3√−γ·tµν,L- is a Lagrangians density of physical ﬁelds (see in details [2], [3])) have form γαβDdi −,αDdi +,βI˜Φµν=α1b2˜Φµν+λ˜tµν(γµν,ΦA) + (9) +2a0γ44Ddi −,tDdi +,tα2˜Φµν ˜tµν=−2δL δγµν Ddi ±,µ˜Φµν= 0 (10) In equations (9) the tensors of gravitational ﬁelds ˜Φµν included in the form of column ˜Φµν= ˜Φµν 1 ˜Φ2µν ˜Φ3µν ˜Φ4µν  The metric tensor γαβis a function (or functional) of the tensors of gravitational ﬁelds ˜Φµνand deﬁned on the fractal pseudo Euclidean Minkowski time-space. These dependencies the γαβfrom˜Φµνoriginated by dependen- cies the interval dS2from ˜Φµνbecause the last in the fractal Minkowski space has the complicated form (see [3]) and may be expand in powers of ˜Φµν. For expansion γµνin powers of ˜Φµνobtain γµν(˜Φµν, Ddt +,t˜Φµν, ..) =γµν+ (11) +/summationdisplay Aµν αβ˜Φαβ+... wereAµν αβare coeﬃcients of expansion and depend at coordinate and time. So if it is possible when for large distances from center of gravity r0(r0<< r) to limit oneself by two ﬁrst members of (11) we may write γµν(˜Φαβ)≈γµν+˜Φµν The equation (10) describes the boundary conditions for ˜Φµνon the Universe surface and bis a mass of gravi- ton and play role of parameter expanding the domain of existence of GFD. VI. GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS DEFINED ON THE RIEMANN SPACE MEASURE CARRIER As the carrier of a measure is the Riemann space with an integer dimensions we obtain the determination for covariant derivatives in Riemann space with fractional dimensions Ddi ±,αtµν=Ddi ±,αtµν+γν αβtµβi=t, r (12) where tµνis the energy-momentum tensor and γµνis the metric tensor of the Riemann ”four-dimension space withfractional dimensions”, Ddi ±,αare GFD, γν αβare Christof- fel symbols γν αβ=1 2γνσ(Ddi ±,αγβσ+Ddi ±,βγασ+Ddi ±,σγαβ) (13) The equations for gravitation ﬁeld tensor ˜Φµνthan read γαβDν,di −,αDν,di +,βI˜Φµν=b2α1˜Φµν+λ˜tµν(γµν,ΦA) + (14) +2a0Ddt −,+Ddt +,tα2˜Φµν where bis a constant value that necessary to introduce for using more broad sets of functions with GFD and it after calculations must be put zero. The Φµνis a four column matrix. So we have again four equations for gravitational ﬁelds with real and imaginary energies. The equation for curvature tensor (with GFD ) have an usual form, but it will be four equations for diﬀerent the curvature tensors R(i), i= 1,2,3,4 and necessary take into account correc- tions in the covariant derivatives from fractal nature of space and of modifying Lorents transformations Rµν i−1 2γµνRi=8π√−gTµν i (15) Ddi ±,µ˜gµν i= 0 (16) The equation (16) describes the boundary conditions for gµνon the Universe surface. For the case of weak ﬁelds the generalized covariant derivatives may be represented as (see [3]) Ddi ±,αtµν≈′Ddi ±,αtµν+′′Ddi ±,αtµν(17) The′Ddi ±,αin (17) describes the contribution from FD of time and space, the member′′Ddi ±,αdescribes the contri- bution from Riemann space with integer dimensions. Let us see what diﬀerences between very similar equa- tions (9) and (14). The equation (9) diﬀers from equation (14) based on the Riemannian measure by three aspects: a) the metric tensor γµνin (9) determined on the Minkowski space with fractional dimensions; b) equations diﬀers by dependencies of metrics tensor γµν fromL( because in the (9) there are no dependencies in theγµνfromLoriginated by the Riemann metric ten- sor), there are only dependencies originating by FD; c) the reason of appearance in equation (9) of the depen- dencies the γµνatLlay in the originate it by the only fractal dimensions of time and space. If FD are integer the (9) coincide with equation of the theory [2]. If FD integer in (14) these equations coincide with equations of GR. For weak ﬁelds GFD may be represented only by FD covariant derivatives (only two members in the right part of (11)) and in that case (9) may be represented by metric tensor gµνof an ”eﬀective” Riemann space with integer dimensions as in [2] (see also [3]). So (9) gives 4the equations GR too. We pay attention that the corre- sponding results of the theory [2] for connections between metric tensor γµνof Minkowski space with ”eﬀective” metric tensor gµνof Riemann space and gravitation ten- sor (thou they are valid) are the special case of our the- ory. In general case the metric tensor of Minkowski space are complicated function of gravitation ﬁeld tensor. We took into account the alterations in equations originated by modiﬁed Lorents transformations in models with both measures (Riemann and Minkowski). VII. CONCLUSION In this paper we considered the two models of grav- ity theories deﬁned on the multifractal sets of time and space. From our point of view there are two main ap- proach to theories of gravity: the ﬁrst is the approach of Einstein’s theory in which the gravitation ﬁelds and forces are no exist and its role play the curvature of the Riemannian time-space originated by Riemannian geom- etry. The second approach is the approach of postulat- ing the real gravitational ﬁelds and forces made in the Logunov-Mestvirichvili theory [2]. The last theory treats the gravity as an usual real ﬁeld in the ﬂat pseudo Eu- clidean time-space and it is the very attractive feature of this theory. The results of both theories coincide on the distances far from the gravitational radius of centre of gravity. On the distances of order the gravitational ra- dius (if our Universe is multifractal set of space and time points deﬁned on the measure carrier) the both theories it seems are not correct. In the Universe with multifractal dimensions of time and space on these distances the main role will play the integral characteristics of GFD and all equations become not diﬀerential but integral equations without containing of any inﬁnity. We presented in these paper the new theory of gravity: gravity theory in the time and the space with fractional dimensions. This the- ory use the idea and results of works [3] - [6], [12]- [14] and take into account the corrections to SR given by the theory of almost inertial systems in the time with frac- tional dimensions [13]. In other words this gravitation theory expand the main results of [14] on the gravita- tional ﬁelds. Let us enumerate now the main results the theory pre- sented in this paper: 1) The theory gives four sorts of diﬀerent gravitation ﬁelds: two ﬁelds with real energy ( these ﬁelds diﬀers by the sign of their energies (the ﬁeld for gravitons and the ﬁeld for anti-gravitons) and two ﬁelds with imaginary energies. The situation is the same as for vector (elec- tromagnetic) and spinor (electron-positron) ﬁelds consid - ered in [14]; 2) The interactions for each of both ﬁelds with real en-ergies with imaginary energies ﬁelds are diﬀerent. This gives the possibility to introduce the assumption about existence of new characteristics of gravitational ﬁelds ( ”quasi-spin” ) for explaining these facts; 3) The consideration of two models of a measure carriers ( the measure on Riemannian space and the measure on Minkowski space) are made. 4) The presented theory coincide with GR or the the- ory Logunov-Mestvirichvili for case when FD of time and space become integer. 5) In the fractal time and space the ordinary derivatives and integral must be replaced by GFD. So the main idea of this work may be used for generalization of all gravita- tional theories not considered here , including quantum theories of gravitation. 6) In this paper adopted the point of view: our Universe is multifractal sets of time and space ”points” (see de- tails in the [3]- [4]). As any multifractal set it deﬁned on a measure carrier. Thus the Universe is an open system (statistical theory of open systems see in the [19], [20]) and the all physical conservation laws (energy, mass and so on) fulﬁll as the very good approach. The exact the conservation laws fulﬁll only for closed system: the Uni- verse plus the measure carrier. So the correct selection of measure is a very serious task and it is the task of near future. In the domains of Universe where the correction to integer time and space dimensions are very small (in such domain of Universe we live and such domains are in distances far away from gravitational radius) the ex- change by energy, mass, momentum and so on between the Universe and the measure carrier is very small too and it may be neglected. It is necessary nevertheless re- member about continuous exchange by energy between Universe and the measure carrier ( absorption and emis- sion of energy) in every place of our Universe in the frame of presented fractal theory. The Universe never lost its energy it seems in that case and the far energy future of Universe is not so sad. (7) In this paper we considered the characteristics of gravitational ﬁelds (characteristics electromagnetic an d electron-positron ﬁelds were considered in [14]. Naturall y the algorithm used in the paper may be applied to any ﬁelds (electro-weak, Lee-Yang, quarks and so on) in do- mains where the fractional correction to the dimensions of time are small. In that case will be true the main re- sults of this paper: every physical ﬁelds must be replaced by four ﬁelds with the real and imaginary energies. So it seems very likely that all physical ﬁelds must have their imaginary twins (if our Universe is fractal). 8) Nobody knows what the time and the space dimen- sions has our Universe. If the dimensions of time and space are fractional the presented in this paper the the- 5ories of gravitational ﬁelds will be true ( if at least one of the selections the measures carrier are valid) and will describe the reality of our Universe. As was stressed in [13] the one of methods of veriﬁcation the fractal the- ory of time and space is to accelerate the charge particle to speed of light that in the time with fractional dimen- sions is possible (because for spaces with FD of time the SR was modiﬁed in the narrow domain of velocities near velocity of light (see [5]- [6] ) . [1] Einstein A. Complete works, v.1, Moscow: Nauka,1965 (in Russian) [2] Logunov A.A., Mestvirichvili M.A.,Theoretical and Mathematical Physics,1997, v.110, p.1-20 (in Russian) [3] Kobelev L.Ya. Fractal Theory Time and Space , Ekater- inburg: Konross, 1999, 136p.(in Russian); Fractal Theory Time and Space /Kobelev L.Ya.// Ural State Univ., Eka- terinburg, 1998.-158p.-Bibliogr.51Nam.-Rus.-Dep.v VIN - ITY 22.01.99,189-B99 (in Russian.); [4] Kobelev L.Ya., What Dimensions Do the Time and Space Have: Integer or Fractional? xxx.arXiv:physics/0001035; [5] Kobelev L.Ya. Multifractality of Time and Special The- ory of Relativity / Kobelev L.Ya.// Ural State Univ., Ekaterinburg, 1999. -21p. -Bibliogr.14Ref.-Rus.-Dep.v VINITY 19.08.99, 2677-B99.01.99,(in Rus.); Kobelev L.Ya./ Dep. v VINITI. Ekaterinburg. 20.10.99.3128-B99; [6] Kobelev L.Ya., Can a Particle’s Velocity Exceeds the Speed of Light in the Empty Space? xxx.arXiv:gr- qc/0001042; [7] Kobelev L.Ya., Physical Consequences of Moving Faster than Light in Empty Space,xxx.arXiv:gr-qc /0001043; [8] Kobelev L.Ya. , Multifractality of Time and Space, Co- variant Derivatives and Gauge Invariance,xxx.arXiv:hep- th/ 0002005; [9] Kobelev L.Ya.,Generalized Riemann -Liouville Frac- tional Derivatives for Multifractal Sets,xxx.arXiv: math.CA/0002008,; [10] Kobelev L.Ya., The Multifractal Time and Irreversibil ity in Dynamic Systems,xxx.arXiv:physics/0002002; [11] Kobelev L.Ya., Is it Possible to Transfer an Informatio n with the Velocities Exceeding Speed of Light in Empty Space?,xxx.arXiv:physics/ 0002003; [12] Kobelev L.Ya., Maxwell Equation, Shroedinger Equa- tion, Dirac Equation, Einstein Equation Deﬁned on the Multi fractal Sets of the Time and the Space,xxx.arXiv:gr-qc/0002003 [13] Kobelev L.Ya. Does Special Relativity Have Limits of Applicability in the Domain of Very Large Energies?, xxx.arXiv:physics/0005069 [14] Kobelev L.Ya. The Theory of Fractal Time: Field Equations (The Theory of Almost Inertial Systems and Modiﬁed Lorentz Transformations) ,xxx.arXive: physics/0005068 [15] Kobelev L.Ya. Are the Laws of Thermodynamics Consequences of a fractal Properties of Universe?xxx.arXiv:physics/0003036 [16] Kobelev L.Ya. Is the Time a Dimension of an Alien Uni- verse? xxx.arXiv:physycs/0005070 [17] S.G.Samko , A.A.Kilbas , O.I.Marichev, Fractional inte- grals and derivatives - theory and applications (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1993) [18] I.M.Gelfand, G.E.Shilov, Generalized functions (Aca- demic Press, New York, 1964) [19] Klimontovich Yu.L. Statistical theory of open systems 1 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995); [20] Klimontovich Yu.L., Statistical theory of open systems 2 , (Moscow: Yanus,1999, 439p)(in Russian) 6
arXiv:physics/0006030v1 [physics.ed-ph] 10 Jun 2000A new solution for inﬂation Valerio Faraoni Research Group in General Relativity (RggR) Universit´ e Libre de Bruxelles, Campus Plaine CP231 Boulevard du Triomphe, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium E–mail: vfaraoni@ulb.ac.be and INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati P.O. Box 13, I-00044 Frascati, Italy Abstract Many pedagogical introductions of inﬂation are eﬀective du e to the simplicity of the relevant equations. Here an analytic solution of the c osmological equa- tions is presented and used as an example to discuss fundamen tal aspects of the inﬂationary paradigm. To appear in Am. J. Phys.1 Introduction The standard big bang cosmology1−4is a very successful theory of the universe with certain drawbacks. They include the horizon, ﬂatness and mo nopole problems5,6or, in short, the ability to explain the observed universe only whe n the initial conditions are extremely ﬁne-tuned. Cosmic inﬂation solves the problems o f big bang cosmology and was introduced7at the beginning of the 80’s. Today, almost 20 years later, in ﬂation is incorporated into modern cosmology and is a mature topic for inclusion in introductory courses in gravitation and cosmology. Inﬂation consists of a short period of accelerated superlum inal expansion of the early universe, at the end of which the description of the standard big bang model is applied. During the inﬂationary epoch, the matter content of the univ erse has an equation of state very close to that of the quantum vacuum, P=−ρ(where ρandPare, respectively, the energy density and pressure of matter). Inﬂation also pr ovides a mechanism for the generation of density perturbations through quantum ﬂu ctuations of the scalar ﬁeld which is supposed to drive the cosmic expansion4,8−12. Although the original scenario of inﬂation and many others p roposed to date are based on speciﬁc particle physics theories, the point of vie w of modern cosmology has shifted: inﬂation is currently regarded as a paradigm , a general idea that can be imple- mented in a variety of ways to describe the early universe. Th ere are many inﬂationary scenarios in the literature, but none is accepted as compell ing and there is no “standard model” of inﬂation. In this phenomenological point of view i t is possible to present cosmological inﬂation in the classroom in an easy way, witho ut previous knowledge of advanced particle physics. The task is made feasible by the s implicity of the equations of inﬂation, ordinary diﬀerential equations which are solv ed in the slow rollover approx- imation, a simpliﬁcation used in most inﬂationary theories . Inﬂation is the subject of numerous textbooks and introductory review papers4,8,10−13as well as science popular- ization articles and books14. Important issues in understanding inﬂation are the slow rol lover approximation, the equivalence between a constant scalar ﬁeld potential and th e cosmological constant, and the correspondence between the equation of state and the sca lar ﬁeld potential. This paper discusses these aspects of inﬂation in detail, throug h the example of an exact analytic solution of the dynamical equations. The latter is derived using elementary calculus and is used to clarify the issues mentioned above, w ith the added virtue of being useful for introducing the cosmic no-hair theorems. 12 The slow rollover approximation In this section we recall the basics about the cosmological c onstant, inﬂation, and the slow rollover approximation used for simplifying and solvi ng the equations of inﬂation. In general relativity a spatially homogeneous and isotropi c universe is described by a metric of the Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker clas s1−4. For simplicity, we set our discussion in such a universe with ﬂat spatial sections, described by the line element ds2=−dt2+a2(t)/parenleftBig dx2+dy2+dz2/parenrightBig , (2.1) in comoving coordinates ( t, x, y, z ), where a(t) is the scale factor of the universe. For this metric, the Einstein equations of general relativity r educe to15−17 ¨a a=−4πG 3(ρm+ 3Pm) +Λ 3, (2.2) H2≡/parenleftbigg˙a a/parenrightbigg2 =8πG 3ρm+Λ 3, (2.3) where an overdot denotes diﬀerentiation with respect to the comoving time tandρm andPmare, respectively, the energy density and pressure of the ma terial content of the universe, which is assumed to be a perfect ﬂuid. H≡˙a/ais the Hubble parameter, Λ is the cosmological constant, Gis Newton’s constant and units are used in which the speed of light in vacuum assumes the value unity. As is clear from the inspection of Eqs. (2.2) and (2.3), it is p ossible to describe the contribution of the cosmological constant as a ﬂuid with ene rgy density and pressure given by ρΛ=Λ 8πG, P Λ=−Λ 8πG, (2.4) respectively, and equation of state P=−ρ. Accordingly, one can rewrite Eqs. (2.2) and (2.3) as ¨a a=−4πG 3(ρ+ 3P), (2.5) /parenleftbigg˙a a/parenrightbigg2 =8πGρ 3, (2.6) where ρ≡ρm+ρΛandP≡Pm+PΛ. Inﬂation is deﬁned as an epoch in the history of the universe during whi ch the cosmic expansion is accelerated, ¨ a >0. Eq. (2.5) shows that acceleration is equivalent 2to a negative pressure satisfying P <−ρ/3. It turns out that an inﬂationary period in which the universe expands by the factor e70solves the ﬁne-tuning problems of the standard big bang cosmology18. In the original model and in most scenarios, inﬂation is obta ined by assuming that at an early time of the order of 10−34seconds the energy density of the cosmological ﬂuid was dominated by a scalar ﬁeld called inﬂaton . Scalar ﬁelds are ever present in particle physics, and it is natural that they played a role wh en the universe had the size of a subatomic particle. Inﬂation can then be seen as scalar ﬁ eld dynamics; the energy density and pressure of a scalar ﬁeld φminimally coupled to gravity are given by19,20 ρ=(˙φ)2 2+V , (2.7) P=(˙φ)2 2−V , (2.8) where V(φ) and ( ˙φ)2/2 are, respectively, the potential and kinetic energy densi ties of the scalar ﬁeld. The scalar φonly depends on the time coordinate, due to the assumption of spatial homogeneity, and satisﬁes the well known Klein-G ordon equation2,4 ¨φ+ 3H˙φ+dV dφ= 0. (2.9) By inserting Eqs. (2.7) and (2.8) into Eqs. (2.5) and (2.6) on e obtains ¨a a=8πG 3/bracketleftBig V(φ)−˙φ2/bracketrightBig , (2.10) H2=8πG 3/bracketleftBigg V(φ) +˙φ2 2/bracketrightBigg , (2.11) which, together with Eq. (2.9), constitute the equations of inﬂation . Note that only two of the three equations (2.9), (2.10) and (2.11) are independ ent; when ˙φ/negationslash= 0, Eq. (2.9) follows from the energy conservation equation21 ˙ρ+ 3H(ρ+P) = 0. (2.12) Diﬀerent inﬂationary scenarios correspond to diﬀerent cho ices of the form of the scalar ﬁeld potential V(φ), which are usually motivated by particle physics argument s. Certain scenarios are set in theories of gravity alternative to gene ral relativity22, and will not be considered here. 3From the didactical point of view, it is interesting that the dynamics of the inﬂaton ﬁeld can be viewed as the motion of a ball with unit mass, posit ionφand speed ˙φrolling on a hill which has a proﬁle given by4the shape of V(φ). The equations of inﬂation are usually solved in the slow rollover approximation , which assumes that the inﬂaton’s speed ˙φis small, that V(φ)≫˙φ2/2, and that the inﬂaton’s motion (described by Eq. (2.9)) is friction-dominated. The n, the acceleration term ¨φ can be neglected in comparison with the force term V′≡dV/dφ and with the friction term 3 H˙φin Eq. (2.9). A necessary condition for this to occur is that t he inequalities /vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleV′ V/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle≪4√ πG , (2.13) /vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleV′′ V/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle≪8πG , (2.14) hold23. In other words, in the slow rollover approximation the slow roll parameters ǫ≡1 16πG/parenleftBiggV′ V/parenrightBigg2 , (2.15) η≡1 8πGV′′ V, (2.16) are small, ǫ,\|η\| ≪1.ǫandηare related, respectively, to the slope and the curvature of the scalar ﬁeld potential V(φ); the smallness of ǫand\|η\|means that the potential V(φ) is relatively ﬂat during slow roll inﬂation. The equations o f inﬂation reduce to the two ﬁrst order equations H2=8πG 3V , (2.17) 3H˙φ=−dV dφ. (2.18) It would be misleading to put excessive emphasis on the requi rement that ǫandηbe small and on the existence of an almost ﬂat section of the pote ntialV(φ) on which the scalar ﬁeld φcan slowly roll (i.e. with small speed ˙φ). Indeed, Eqs. (2.13) and (2.14) are necessary but not suﬃcient conditions for neglecting the ac celeration term in Eq. (2.9); a solution of the ﬁeld equations may well satisfy Eqs. (2.13) and (2.14), but still have a large speed ˙φand therefore not be in slow-rollover; this is the case, at ea rly times, for the exact solution presented in Sec. 4. 43 Equivalence between a constant potential and the cosmological constant In this section we discuss the de Sitter solution viewed as th e prototype of inﬂation; the similarity between slow roll inﬂation and the de Sitter-lik e expansion of the universe is emphasized. The de Sitter solution of the Einstein equations correspond s to exponential cosmic expansion, a(t) =a0eHt, (3.1) H=/parenleftbiggΛ 3/parenrightbigg1/2 , (3.2) and is obtained by setting ρm=Pm= 0 in Eqs. (2.2) and (2.3) and by allowing only the cosmological constant in the right hand side of the ﬁeld e quations. Historically, the de Sitter solution has been known since the beginnings of gen eral relativistic cosmology, long before the idea of inﬂation. As seen in the previous sect ion, the cosmological constant is equivalent to a ﬂuid with the equation of state of quantum vacuum P=−ρ , (3.3) and therefore cosmological constant and vacuum energy are s ynonyms in modern cosmology4. The equation of state (3.3) uniquely leads to the solution (3 .1). The idea that quantum vacuum should be considered as a form of matter and hence as a s ource of gravity in the Einstein equations arose in the Russian school24. While the original de Sitter solution (3.1) is associated to a geometrical cosmological constant, matter can generate an eﬀective cosmological con stant without the need of introducing a geometrical Λ. In fact, the vacuum energy of a s calar ﬁeld mimics a geometric cosmological constant and the de Sitter expansio n of the universe (3.1) can be obtained as the result of scalar ﬁeld dynamics; the latter ar e rather trivial. A constant scalar ﬁeld φ=φ0, (3.4) with the potential V=V0=constant solves the equations of inﬂation (2.10), (2.11), and (2.9) and a=a0exp /radicalBigg 8πGV 0 3t  (3.5) 5for this solution. The idea that a constant, or almost consta nt, scalar ﬁeld appearing in grand uniﬁed theories of particle physics plays the role of a vacuum state contributed to the development of the idea of inﬂation24. The de Sitter solution was the prototype of inﬂation4,8,11,12.14, but its importance for inﬂation is not merely historical. In fact, most of the inﬂat ionary scenarios proposed thus far share the common feature of being solved in the slow r ollover approximation (2.13) and (2.14), which implies that the expansion of the un iverse is quasi-exponential during the slow rollover phase. In fact, when the scalar ﬁeld is in slow rollover, the dominance of the potential over the kinetic energy density, (˙φ)2/2≪V, implies that ρ≈VandP≈ −V, and the equation of state is approximately (3.3), which is equivalent to say that the scale factor is approximated by (3.1). More pr ecisely, during slow roll inﬂation, the scale factor is given by a(t) =a0exp/parenleftbigg/integraldisplay H(t)dt/parenrightbigg ≃a0exp/parenleftbigg H0t+H1 2t2/parenrightbigg , (3.6) where the constant term H0in the expansion of H(t) is dominant. In the rest of this paper we set the geometric cosmological co nstant to zero and we only consider the eﬀective cosmological constant due to the scalar ﬁeld. 4 A new analytic solution A new analytic solution can be derived in the classroom using only elementary calculus, and is presented in this section. It diﬀers from the de Sitter solution, but it is derived from Eqs. (2.2), (2.3), (2.7), and (2.8) under the same assum ption of constant scalar ﬁeld potential that led to the de Sitter solution (3.1). One begins by noting that during slow roll inﬂation the nearl y ﬂat section of the scalar ﬁeld potential plays the role of an eﬀective cosmolog ical constant. One then sets out to determine all the solutions of the exact equations of inﬂation (2.9)-(2.11) corresponding to a constant scalar ﬁeld potential V=V0= const. (4.1) The Klein-Gordon equation (2.9) reduces to ¨φ+ 3H˙φ= 0, (4.2) a trivial solution of which is given by ˙φ= 0, and corresponds to the de Sitter solution discussed in the previous section. Another solution is poss ible when ˙φ/negationslash= 0; in this case 6Eq. (4.2) can be divided by ˙φand immediately integrated to yield ˙φ=±C a3, (4.3) where Cis a positive integration constant. By substituting Eq. (4. 3) into Eq. (2.7) and the resulting expression of the energy density into Eq. (2.3 ) with Λ = 0, one obtains /parenleftbigg˙a a/parenrightbigg2 =8πG 3/parenleftBiggC2 2a6+V0/parenrightBigg . (4.4) Upon use of the auxiliary variable y≡lna, Eq. (4.4) can be reduced to a quadrature, /integraldisplaydy/radicalBig 1 +αexp (−6y)=±/radicalBigg 8πGV 0 3(t−t0), (4.5) where α=C2/(2V0) and t0is an integration constant. By using /integraldisplaydz z√1 +z= ln/parenleftBigg√z+ 1−1√z+ 1 + 1/parenrightBigg , (4.6) where z=αe−6y=αa−6, one easily obtains √ a6+α−a3 √ a6+α+a3= exp ∓12/radicalBigg 2πGV 0 3t , (4.7) where the boundary condition a(t= 0) = 0 has been imposed. The function f(x) =(x6+α)1/2−x3 (x6+α)1/2+x3(4.8) is monotonically decreasing for x≥0 and, since f(0) = 1, it is 0 < f < 1 for any x >0. The right hand side of Eq. (4.7) is always greater than unit y when the positive sign is adopted, hence Eq. (4.7) has no solutions in this case . By contrast, adopting the negative sign in Eq. (4.7), one obtains after straightforwa rd calculations a(t) =a1sinh1/3/parenleftBig√ 3Λt/parenrightBig , (4.9) 7where a1= (4πGC2/Λ)1/6and Λ = 8 πGV 0. Eq. (4.3) yields the corresponding scalar ﬁeld φ(t) =φ0ln/bracketleftBigg tanh/parenleftBigg√ 3Λt 2/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg +φ1, (4.10) where φ0=±(12πG)−1/2andφ1is an integration constant with the dimensions of a mass. It is straightforward to check that the solution (4.9) and (4.10) satisﬁes Eqs. (2.9) and (2.11); to check that Eq. (2.10) is also satisﬁed, it is su ﬃcient to note that, given Eqs. (2.9) and (2.11), Eq. (2.10) follows from the conservat ion equation (2.12). The solution given by Eqs. (4.9) and (4.10) has a big bang sing ularity at t= 0, with the asymptotic behavior a(t)≈t1/3, φ≈φ0ln/parenleftBigg√ 3Λt 2/parenrightBigg +φ1 (4.11) ast→0. At t= 0 the scale factor vanishes while φ,ρandPdiverge. The initial speed ˙φalso diverges and the solution is deﬁnitely not in slow rollo ver, despite the fact that the potential is ﬂat (in fact, constant). However, a slow rol lover regime is approached as the universe evolves: at late times t→+∞the solution (4.9) and (4.10) is asymptotic to the de Sitter solution (3.1). This is in agreement with the cosmic no-hair theorems, as explained later. 5 Equation of state and scalar ﬁeld potential We will now return to the exact solution (4.9) and (4.10) and i nterpret them in terms of the equation of state relating pressure and energy densit y. The eﬀective equation of state of the universe correspondin g to Eqs. (4.9) and (4.10) is given by P ρ= 1−2 tanh2/parenleftBig√ 3Λt/parenrightBig ; (5.1) it changes with time and interpolates between the equation o f state P=ρat early times and the vacuum equation of state P=−ρat late times. This feature of the solution cautions against a possible misunderstanding, i.e. the bel ief that ﬁxing the scalar ﬁeld potential V(φ) is equivalent to prescribing the equation of state. This be lief would be false: in fact, by ﬁxing the scalar ﬁeld potential to be const ant,V=V0, one does not uniquely determine the evolution of the universe: the solut ions (4.9), (4.10) and (3.1), (3.4) correspond to very diﬀerent physical situations and e quations of state. In order 8to completely specify the microphysics, it is not suﬃcient t o prescribe the scalar ﬁeld potential, but one must provide complete information on the state of the scalar ﬁeld (i.e. also the ﬁeld’s “speed” ˙φin our example). For ageneral potential V, the eﬀective equation of state of the universe dominated by a scalar ﬁeld is given by P ρ=˙φ2−2V ˙φ2+ 2V≡w(x), (5.2) where x≡˙φ2/2Vis the ratio between the kinetic and the potential energy den sities of the scalar φ. Under the usual assumption V≥0 (which guarantees that the energy density ρis non-negative when ˙φ= 0), one has that, for x≥0, the function w(x) = (x2−1)(x2+ 1)−1increases monotonically from its minimum wmin=−1 attained at x= 0 to the horizontal asymptote +1 as x→+∞. The slow rollover regime corresponds to the region \|x\| ≪1 and to wnear its minimum, where the kinetic energy density of φis negligible in comparison to its potential energy density . As the kinetic energy density ˙φ2/2 increases, the equation of state progressively deviates f romP=−ρand the pressure becomes less and less negative; the system grad ually moves away from the slow rollover regime. At the equipartition between the kine tic and the potential energy densities ( x= 1), one has the “dust” equation of state P= 0. The pressure becomes positive as xincreases and, when the kinetic energy density completely d ominates the potential energy density ( x≫1), one ﬁnally reaches the equation of state P=ρ. The solution (4.9) and (4.10) for V=const. spans the entire possible range for the equation of state during the evolution of the universe, starting from x= +∞at early times and asymptotically evolving towards x= 0 at late times. 6 Discussion and conclusions We now comment on the exact solution described by Eqs. (4.9) a nd (4.10) and compare it to the de Sitter solution. In doing so, we will sharpen our u nderstanding of the slow rollover approximation and introduce an interesting cosmi c no-hair theorem. Both solutions (4.9), (4.10) and (3.1), (3.4) of the Einstei n-Friedmann equations correspond to a constant scalar ﬁeld potential V=V0andexactly satisfy Eqs. (2.13) and (2.14), which are necessary, but not suﬃcient, conditions f or slow roll inﬂation. While the de Sitter solution (3.1) corresponds to perfect slow roll ( ˙φ= 0) and to exact exponential expansion of the universe, the solution (4.9), (4.10) exhib its signiﬁcant diﬀerences. It has a big bang singularity at t= 0, while the de Sitter universe with inﬁnite age has existed 9forever and the timescale over which the latter changes,/radicalBig 3/Λ, is constant (see Ref. 25 for a pedagogical discussion of the self-similarity proper ties of the de Sitter solution). By contrast, the solution given by Eqs. (4.9) and (4.10) has a timescale given by the Hubble time H−1=/radicalBigg 3 Λtanh/parenleftBig√ 3Λt/parenrightBig , (6.1) which is time-dependent and becomes nearly constant (with v alue/radicalBig 3/Λ) only for t→ +∞. Near the big bang singularity the universe obeys the equati on of state P=ρ. In this region, not only the solution fails to be in slow roll ove r the ﬂat potential, but it is not even inﬂationary; even though the slow roll parameters ǫandηexactly vanish, the speed ˙φof the scalar ﬁeld is large. This clearly shows that the slow r ollover approximation must be formulated by means of conditions on the solutions of the ﬁeld equations, not only as a set of conditions on the scalar ﬁeld potential V(φ). The relative ﬂatness of the potential is not all there is to the slow rollover approximat ion. Finally, the solution described by Eqs. (4.9) and (4.10) con stitutes a useful example to introduce the cosmic no-hair theorems26. The latter state that, when a positive cosmological constant (or vacuum energy) Λ is present, the d e Sitter solution (3.1), (3.4) behaves as an attractor for the other solutions26. The example solution (4.9) and (4.10) clearly illustrates this behavior and is particular ly useful to introduce the cosmic no-hair theorems (the proof of which requires more sophisti cated mathematics than the ones used in this paper26). In spite of the fact that the solution (4.9) and (4.10) begi ns at early times very diﬀerently from a de Sitter solution, it c onverges exponentially fast to the latter as time progresses. In fact, the ratio of the (suit ably normalized) scale factors (4.9) and (3.1) is given by/bracketleftBig 1−exp/parenleftBig −2√ 3Λt/parenrightBig/bracketrightBig1/3, which tends to unity at large times t, while the scalar ﬁeld (4.10) asymptotically converges to th e constant φ1. This happens because the de Sitter solution (3.1) is an attractor point th at captures the orbits of the solutions in the phase space, including the orbit of the exac t solution (4.9) and (4.10). Indeed, the cosmic no-hair theorems are more general, stati ng that the de Sitter space is approached even starting from an anisotropic spacetime26. As a conclusion, cosmological inﬂation is described by simp le ordinary diﬀerential equations and its basic features can be discussed in the clas sroom without the need of complicated mathematical tools. The phenomenological app roach to inﬂation adopted in recent years by the community of cosmologists supports th e introduction of the inﬂa- tionary paradigm without the need of a lengthy premise about advanced particle physics to justify it. Indeed, the basic features of inﬂation can be g rasped without the knowledge of high energy theories. 10The increasing number of pedagogical introductions to inﬂa tion seems to reﬂect this point of view. The exact solution shown in this paper should h elp the circulation of simple but signiﬁcant ideas of modern cosmology. 11Acknowledgments The author thanks L. Niwa for reviewing the manuscript and an anonymous referee for valuable suggestions. This work was supported by the EEC grants PSS* 0992 and SEAC-1999-00039 and by OLAM, Fondation pour la Recherche Fo ndamentale, Brussels. 1L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifschitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon, Oxford, 1989), pp. 358-368. 2R.M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1984), pp. 91-117. 3R. D’Inverno, Introducing Einstein’s Relativity (Clarendon, Oxford, 1992), chap. 22- 23. 4E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The Early Universe (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990), pp. 261-317. 5R.M. Wald, op. cit. , pp. 107-108. 6E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, op. cit. , pp. 261-269. 7A.H. Guth, The Inﬂationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizo n and Flatness Problems , Physical Review D 23, 347-356. 8A.D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inﬂationary Cosmology (Hardwood Academic, Chur, Switzerland, 1990). 9A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth, The Cold Dark Matter Density Perturbation , Physics Reports 231, 1–105 (1993). 10M.S. Turner, in Recent Directions in Particle Theory - From Superstrings an d Black Holes to the Standard Model , Proceedings of the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder, Colorado 1992, J. Harvey and J. Polchinski eds. (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1993). 11S.K. Blau and A.H. Guth, Inﬂationary Cosmology , in300 Years of Gravitation , S.W. Hawking and W. Israel eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cam bridge, 1987), pp. 424- 603. 12A.R. Liddle, An Introduction to Cosmological Inﬂation , in Proceedings of the ICTP Summer School in High Energy Physics, Trieste, Italy 1998, i n press (also available as preprint astro-ph/9901124 on the Fermilab preprint server ). 13J.E. Lidsey, A.R. Liddle, E.J. Copeland, T. Barreiro and M. A bney,Reconstructing the Inﬂaton Potential–an Overview , Reviews of Modern Physics 69, 373-410 (1997). 14A.H. Guth, The Inﬂationary Universe (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1997). 15R.M. Wald, op. cit. , p. 97. 1216R. D’Inverno, op. cit. , p. 322. 17E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, op. cit. , pp. 49-50. 18E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, op. cit. , pp. 281-283. 19R.M. Wald, op. cit. , p. 70. 20E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, op. cit. , p. 277. 21R.M. Wald, op. cit. , p. 100. 22A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth, op. cit. , pp. 52-54. 23A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth, op. cit. , pp. 42-43. 24A.D. Linde, op. cit. , pp. 35-36. 25R. D’Inverno, op. cit. , pp. 337-338. 26E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, op. cit. , pp. 303-309. 13
arXiv:physics/0006032v1 [physics.class-ph] 12 Jun 2000Excitationsofoscillationsinloadedsystemswithinterna ldegreesoffreedom Michael Gedalin Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel (Dated: January 13, 2014) Abstract Weshowthatoscillations areexcitedinacomplexsystem und er theinﬂuence oftheexternal force, ifthe parametersofthesystemexperiencerapidchangeduetothec hangesinitsinternalstructure. Thisexcitation iscollision-likeanddoesnotrequireanyphasecoherenceo rperiodicity. Thechangeoftheinternalstructure maybeachievedbyothermeanswhichmayrequiremuchloweren ergyexpenses. Themechanismsuggests control over switching oscillations on and off and maybe of p ractical use. PACS numbers: 45.05.+x,45.30.+s,89.90.+n 1A complex system subjected to an external load is a quite comm on phenomenon in nature, laboratory, and industry. Almost all systems experiencing the inﬂuence of external force possess internal structure which is not affected by this force direc tly but may change because of intrinsic dynamics of other external causes. The examples of such syst ems span all possible scales. A planetary magnetosphere under the inﬂuence of the solar win d is in the equilibrium (deﬁned by the stationarity of the magnetopause position) if the time- independent incident plasma pressure is balanced by the magnetic pressure [1]. Yet the “stiffness ” of the compressed magnetosphere isdetermined,amongothers,bythemagnetosphere-ionosph ere-atmosphere-solidearthinteraction [2]. Amusclecanbeheuristicallyrepresentedasasetofspr ingsconnectedinparallelandinseries, the elasticity of these “springs” being dependent on chemic al processes and electrical signals in muscularﬁbers [3]. Thesesystemsmayoscillateglobally(thepositionofthema gnetopause,thelengthofthemus- cle) near the equilibrium position (if not overdamped). The re is a rapid growth of interest in possible effect of the internal variation on the excitation of global modes. Tanimoto and Um [4] suggested that interaction with dynamical atmosphere a nd releases of energy due to weak lo- cal earthquakes may cause persisting global earth oscillat ions. Kepko and Kivelson [5] ﬁnd a relation between magnetosphericbursty bulk ﬂows and low fr equency Earth magnetic ﬁeld oscil- lations. Recently, Chagelishviliet al. [6]proposedamech anismofoscillationexcitationinaone- dimensional oscillatory system, based on the rapid change o f the eigenfrequency. Unfortunately, their analytical consideration was inappropriate which ob scured the physics of the phenomenon and lead themtoconclusionswhicharetoo restricted. In the present paper we investigate the excitation of oscill ations in complex systems due to rapidchangesininternalparametersunderquitegeneral co nditions. Weshowthatsuchexcitation (and oscillation ampliﬁcation) is a quite common phenomeno n and calculate its efﬁciency. This questionmay beofsigniﬁcant importancein applications. O ne can easily imaginesystemswhere such excitation is unwanted (like building constructions) . On the other hand, the possibility of generatingoscillationsbynotchangingexternalforcebut applyingonlyweakforces(andenergy) to cause local rapid changes of the system parameters is rath er attractive. A simplesystem where both situations are possibleis an LC circuit with distribut ed capacity and connected to a constant emf. Excitation of oscillations at the circuit frequency is unwanted when it is used in a device designed to measure electromagneticspectra. On the other h and, such excitation would be useful in sustainingcertain level of the current when weak damping is present and it is difﬁcult to apply 2periodicforcing. Inwhatfollowsweconsiderthesystemsdescribedbythefoll owing(vector)equationofmotion M¨X=−∂U ∂X+F, (1) whereXis the vector of external parameters of the system (position ) which are subject to the external force (position of the magnetopause under the sola r wind pressure, length of the loaded muscle, charge on the effective capacitor when the LC circui t is connected to a constant emf). Let also xbe the vector of internal parameters which are affected in a d ifferent way or vary at a much small time scale for some reasons. The generalized mas s matrix Mand the potential U dependbothontheexternaland Xandinternal xcoordinates,andtheexternalforce Fdependson time. When the equations governing the behavior of the inter nal coordinates xare not known or aretoocomplicatedwemayphenomenologicallydescribethe irinﬂuenceastemporaldependence ofMandU. If the system parameters and external force do not vary with time, the system is in the equilibrium position Xeqwhich is determined by the condition ∂U/∂Xeq=F. Near the equilibriumthepotentialcan bewrittenas U=1 2K·(X−Xm)·(X−Xm), (2) where Kis thestiffnessmatrix,sothat onehas M¨X=−K(X−Xm) +F, (3) whichlooksexactlyasausualoscillatorequationexceptth atnowmassandstiffnessarematrices. Recently it was shownthat theprocess ofvorticesgeneratio n in magnetohydrodynamicand shear ﬂows[7]can bedescribedby aspecialone-dimensionalcase o fEq.(3). The equilibrium position is Xeq=Xm+K−1F, and the general solution of Eq. (3) near the equilibriumpointis X=Xeq+/summationdisplay iaiˆeisin(ωit+φi), (4) where the frequencies ωiand unity vectors ˆeiare the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix W=M−1K, respectively. Since the equilibrium is assumed to be stabl e, the matrix Wis posi- tively determined and all frequencies are real. aiandφiare the amplitudes and initial phases of thenormalmodes. 3Mostly known channels of the energy input to the oscillating system include adiabatic change of the natural frequency, resonance with the periodically c hanging external force, or parametric resonance (see, for example, Ref. [8]). The last two imply (q uasi)periodic behavior of the nat- ural frequency or external force and are not within the scope of the present paper where only nonperiodicchanges areconsidered. The motion of the system is now fully determined by M,K,Xeq, andF. If these parameters changeslowlyatthetypicaltimescaleofoscillations,tha tis,thetypicaltimeofvariationismuch larger than all 1/ωi, the equilibrium adiabatically shifts its position, while the amplitudes follow thewell-knownadiabaticlaw ωia2 i≈const. Inparticular,thesystemwhichwasintheequilibriu m inthebeginningwillremainin theequilibriuminthecourse oftheparametervariation,sothatno oscillationsareexcited. In the present paper we consider the case of rapid parameter c hanges, where the typical time of variation T≪1/ωi, for all i. We show that there this, in general, results in the excita- tion/ampliﬁcation of oscillations in the system. A numeric al example of a special type of exci- tation in thesimplest one-dimensionalsystem was recently considered by Chagelishviliet al. [6]. Here we consideramost general case of nonadiabaticexcitat ionof oscillationsin loaded systems neartheequilibriumpoint. To study quantitatively the effect let us assume that all par ameters vary only within the time interval 0< t < T, andωiT≪1. It is convenient to deﬁne W=M−1Kandf=M−1F. From Eq.(3) oneimmediatelyhas ˙X(T) =/integraldisplayT 0[f(t)−W(t) (X(t)−Xm(t))], (5) where the time dependence of the system parameters is explic itly shown. In what follows we denote the system parameters and variables at t= 0and at t=Twith subscripts 1 and 2, respectively. Thesolutionsat t≤0andt≥Twilltaketheform: Xk(t) =Xkeq+/summationdisplay iakiˆekisin(ωkit+φki), (6) where k= 1fort <0andk= 2fort > T. Since ωiT≪1one can neglect the difference between X1(T)andX2(T), sothatonehas X1eq+/summationdisplay ia1iˆe1isin(ω1iT+φ1i) =X2eq+/summationdisplay ia2iˆe2isin(ω2iT+φ2i). (7) 4Thesecondmatchingconditionis obtainedfromEq. (5)inthe followingform: ˙X2(T)−˙X1(T) =/integraldisplayT 0(f−f1)dt + [/integraldisplayT 0(W−W1)dt]X1(T)−/integraldisplayT 0(WXm−W1X1m)dt.(8) It is convenient to deﬁne the instantaneous equilibrium pos ition as Xeq=Xm+W−1f. Taking intoaccount Eq.(6)onehas /summationdisplay iω2ia2iˆe2icos(ω2iT+φ2i) =/summationdisplay iω1ia1iˆe1icos(ω1iT+φ1i) + [/integraldisplayT 0(W−W1)dt]/summationdisplay ia1iˆe1isin(ω1iT+φ1i) + [/integraldisplayT 0W(X1eq−Xeq)dt].(9) Eqs.(7)and (9)allowonetoﬁnd a2iandφ2iknowingtheinitialstate. It is easily seen that even when a1i= 0for all i, the oscillation amplitude in the ﬁnal state is, ingeneral, nonzero: a2 2i= [ˆe∗ 2i(X2eq−X1eq)]2+1 ω2 2i[/integraldisplayT 0ˆe∗ 2iW(X−X1eq)]2. (10) Thus, the oscillation is excited due to the (a) irreversible shift of the equilibrium position (ﬁrst term in Eq. (10)) and (b) reversible temporal shift of the equ ilibrium position with subsequent return to the same equilibrium (the second term). The nature of the energy input is different for the two mechanisms (instantaneous change of the potential e nergy in the ﬁrst case, and work done by the external force because of the excursion of the sys tem from the equilibrium in the second case) but in both cases the interaction is collision- like: certain amount of momentum and energy istransferred tothesysteminashorttimeinterval. Thephysicalnatureoftheexcitationis quite different from the proposed earlier [6] quasi-parame tric resonant interaction with a Fourier- component of the changing eigenfrequency. It is worth notin g that although (10) depends on the change of all parameters, M,K, andXm, the change of the mass Malong does not affect the instantaneous equilibrium position Xeqand therefore does not result in the oscillation excitation , as couldbeexpected. WithinthechosenapproximationEq.(10)includesallpossi bleinternalperturbationsof M,K, andXm,andexternalperturbationsof F,thusgivingthemostgeneraldescriptionfornonadiabatic excitation of complex systems. It includes the system consi dered in Ref. 6 as a special one- dimensionalcasewhereonly Kischanged. ItisinstructivetorewriteEq.(10)forthiscas e,where 5Xm= 0, andf1=f2,W=ω2, andω1=ω2. Then the excited amplitude takes the following simpleform: a2=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/integraldisplayT 0ω2 ω1/parenleftbiggf1 ω2 1−f ω2/parenrightbigg dt/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle, (11) from which one can easily see that the excitation occurs alwa ys and not only when the eigenfre- quencydecreases intheperturbation(cf. Ref. 6). In what follows for simplicity of presentation we restrict o urselves with the one-dimensional case. Multidimensional generalization is straightforwar d. In the one-dimensional case Eqs. (7) and (9)immediatelygive a2 2= [(X1eq−X2eq) +a1sin(ω1T+φ1)]2 +ω−2 2[a1ω1cos(ω1T+φ1) + (/integraldisplayT 0(ω2−ω2 1)dt)a1sin(ω1T+φ1) +/integraldisplayT 0ω2(X1eq−Xeq)dt]2.(12) In most cases the phase φ1of the interaction beginning is unknown (unless the perturb ation is carefullypreparedwithsomedeﬁnitepurposeinmind). Inth iscaseonecanconsiderthephase φ1 as randomand averageoverrandomdistributiontoobtaineve ntually: a2 2=1 2a2 1/bracketleftBigg 1 +ω2 1 ω2 2+(/integraltextT 0(ω2−ω2 1)dt)2 ω2 2/bracketrightBigg + (X1eq−X2eq)2+1 ω2 2/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplayT 0ω2(X1eq−Xeq)dt/bracketrightbigg2 .(13) Eq. (13) describes the ampliﬁcation (reduction) of oscilla tions (ﬁrst term) and excitation of os- cillations due to the shift of the of the equilibrium positio n and to the work of the external force duringtemporalshiftoftheequilibrium. In the particular case of perturbation where after time inte rvalTthe system parameters return totheirinitialvalues,onearrivesagainat a2 2−a2 1=/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplayT 0ω2 ω1/parenleftbiggf1 ω2 1−f ω2/parenrightbigg dt/bracketrightbigg2 , (14) where we neglected the term containing [/integraltextT 0(ω2−ω2 1)dt]2/ω2 2≪1. Roughly speaking, during the excursion of the internal parameters from their equilib rium values the energy of oscillations increases by δE= [/integraltextT 0ω2(X1eq−Xeq)dt]2on average. If the system experiences a series of N 6suchrapidvariationswithrandomlydistributedphases,th etotaloscillationenergyincreasewould beabout NδE, withoutanynecessityto arrangethephasesorperiodicity ofthevariations. Another efﬁcient method of excitation is the rapid shift fro m the equilibrium position with subsequent return to this position after time ≫1/ω. In this case, neglecting the last term in Eq.(14)and after somealgebraoneobtains a2 2=a2 1/parenleftbiggω2 1+ω2 2 2ω1ω2/parenrightbigg2 + (X2eq−X1eq)2/parenleftbigg3 2+ω4 1+ω4 2 4ω2 1ω2 2/parenrightbigg , (15) whichshowsthatthisscenario always resultsintheoscilla tionampliﬁcation. To conclude, we haveshown that nonadiabatic changes in the s ystem parameters and/or exter- nal force are efﬁcient in excitation or ampliﬁcation of osci llations in driven oscillatory systems under external load. Randomly distributed in time, short no nadiabatic pulses result in efﬁcient transfer of energy to the system. The energy transfer manife sts itself in continuously increasing oscillation amplitude. This amplitude increase is not rest ricted to the periodically repeated (co- herent) perturbations, as was suggested in [6], but occurs i n quite general conditions. The energy inputeffectisessentiallynonresonantandmorecollision -likewhereadditionalmomentum/energy are transferred to the system at the time scale much smaller t han the typical timescale of varia- tions in the system. The effect may be important for the syste ms whose natural frequencies may vary quickly due to the variable internal coupling. It shoul d be emphasized that the importance of the above analysis is well beyond the consideration of sim ple oscillatory systems, desribed by the simple oscillatory potential in the form (2) (chosen her e for convenience and simplicity of presentation),butmaybeappliedtoquitegeneralsystems. Theresults(qualitatively)arevalidfor any system capable of (generally nonlinear) oscillations n ear the forced equilibrium position (al- though quantitative calculations would require knowledge of the structure of a particular system and ability to translate it into a low-dimensional descript ion with small number of parameters). There is a wide spectrum of such systems, from large astrophy sical scales (gravitationally bound systems, planetary magnetospheres under solar wind inﬂuen ce) to usual human scale (muscles, constructions)and downtosmallscales (electriccircuits ). Such generationofoscillationsmaybe unwanted in some systems, like possible excitation of inter nal currents in spacecraft circuits by cosmic rays. On the other hand, the essentially nonresonant generation of oscillations might be useful inexperimentaldeterminationofthenatural freque ncies ofthesystemswhere it isdifﬁcult to apply periodic external force but where the internal stru cture can be changed relatively easily and rapidly. Such methods can be also used to re-excite dampe d oscillations without changing of 7themainload. Finally,letususeaverysimplemodeltoseewhetherreconne ctionatthedaysidemagnetopause may be responsible for excitations of global magnetospheri c oscillations. The position of the magnetopause is determined by the balance of the incident pl asma pressure numpV2 u(where nu andVuare the solar wind density and velocity, respectively, and mpis the proton mass) and the magnetic pressure B2/8π. Is the magnetopause is compressed by x, the magnetohydrodynamic conservationofmagneticﬂux[9]predictsthatthemagnetic ﬁeld increases as L/(L−x)where L is the equilibrium standoff distance of the magnetopause. T hus, there appears the excess force of ∼2numpV2 uxA/L, where Ais the effective area. This force has to accelerate the mass o f about ndmpAD,where nd≈5nuistheaverageplasmadensity,and Disthedistancebetweentheshock and magnetopause. Using the typical parameters Vu∼400km/s, L∼10RE, andD∼RE, where RE∼6,000kmistheEarthradius[9],oneﬁndsthetypicaloscillationp eriodsoftheorder of∼10min. On the other hand, the typical time of reconnection shou ld be of the order d/vn, where d∼800km is the magnetopause width [10], while the velocity vnmay be as high as 50 km/s [11]. Thus, the typical timeof reconnection ∼10sec and much smaller than the oscillation period. Reconnection results in the breakdown of magnetohy drodynamics and therefore reduces the “stiffness” of the magnetic ﬁeld, thus effectively temp orarily reducing the global oscillation frequency. Hence, the conditions of Eq. (14) are satisﬁed an d excitation is possible. Of course, quantitative calculations require that we are able to trans late the reconnection process into the change of internal parameters, so that at this stage the prop osed scenario should be considered as aspeculativehypothesis. [1] W.J. Hughes, in Introduction to space physics, (ed. M.G.Kivelson and C.T. Russell, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, p.227,1995). [2] A.Yoshikawa, M.Itonaga, S.Fujita, et al. J.Geophys. Re s.,104,28437 (1999). [3] H.J.Metcalf, Topicsin classical biophysics, Prentice-Hall, N.J. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,1980. [4] T. Tanimoto and J.Um,J. Geophys. Res., 104,28723 (1999). [5] L.Kepko and M.Kivelson, J.Geophys. Res., 104,25021 (1999). [6] G.D.Chagelishvili, A.G.Tevzadze,G.T.Gogoberidze, a ndJ.G.Lominadze,Phys.Rev.Lett. 84,1619 (2000). 8[7] G.D.Chagelishvili, A.G.Tevzadze, G.Bodo, and S.S.Moi seev, Phys. Rev.Lett., 79,3178 (1997). [8] V.I. Arnold, Mathematical methods of classical mechani cs, (NY, Springer, 1989). [9] T.E.Cravens, Physics of solar system plasmas, Cambridge University Press, NewYork, 1997. [10] C.T.Russell, in Physics of the magnetopause, Geophysical Monograph 90, ed. P. Song, B.U. ¨O. Son- nerup, and M.F.Thomsen, American Geophysical Union, Washi ngton, 1995, p. 81. [11] J. Berchem, J. Raeder, and M. Ashour-Abdala, in Physics of the magnetopause, Geophysical Mono- graph 90,ed.P.Song,B.U. ¨O.Sonnerup, andM.F.Thomsen, AmericanGeophysical Union, Washing- ton, 1995, p. 205. 9
arXiv:physics/0006033v1 [physics.data-an] 12 Jun 2000A path-integral approach to the collisionless Boltzmann gas C. Y. Chen Dept. of Physics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, PRC Email: cychen@public2.east.net.cn Abstract : On contrary to the customary thought, the well-known “lemm a” that the distribution function of a collisionless Boltzman n gas keeps invari- ant along a molecule’s path represents not the strength but t he weakness of the standard theory. One of its consequences states that the velocity dis- tribution at any point is a condensed “image” of all, complex and even dis- continuous, structures of the entire spatial space. Admitt ing the inability to describe the entire space with a microscopic quantity, this paper introduces a new type of distribution function, called the solid-angle -average distribu- tion function. With help of the new distribution function, t he dynamical behavior of collisionless Boltzmann gas is formulated in te rms of a set of integrals deﬁned by molecular paths. In the new formalism, n ot only that the diﬃculties associated with the standard theory are surm ounted but also that some of practical gases become calculable in terms of to day’s computer. PACS number: 51.10.+y. 11 Introduction The Boltzmann gas, by which we mean a gas in that molecules are subject to binary short-range interparticle forces, is usually stu died by means of the Boltzmann equation[1][2]. The conventional wisdom ass umes that if a suﬃciently large supercomputer were available, a ﬁnite-di ﬀerence scheme could be employed to construct solutions of the Boltzmann eq uation and many realistic gases would become completely analyzable. Some of diﬃculties related to the solution-construction sc heme of the Boltzmann equation are relatively well-known[3]. They inc lude the follow- ing. (i) Seven variables have to be dealt with (time, spatial coordinates and velocity components). (ii) The collisional operator in the Boltzmann equa- tion is complex in nature. Due to these diﬃculties, only low- dimensional problems, for instance those having one dimension of coordi nates and one dimension of velocity components, were tried in practical c alculations. In some of our works[4][5], it was argued that more fundament al diﬃ- culties existed with the standard kinetic theory. One of the m was that dis- tribution functions of Boltzmann gases involved in discont inuity and quasi- discontinuity, thus the eﬀectiveness of using a ﬁnite-diﬀe rence scheme to solve the Boltzmann equation, as well as the validity of the B oltzmann equation itself, became questionable. Putting aside whether the arguments presented by our previo us works are suﬃciently convincing or not, we will, in this paper, eng age our primary attention with the following subject. Is there any alternat ive approach with the aid of that one can use today’s computational means to cal culate at least some of full-dimensional practical gases? A positive answe r to this question will apparently arouse widespread interest. It turns out that if an average-type distribution function, called the solid- angle-average distribution function, is introduced and th e path-information of molecules is adequately taken into account, then the obje ctive mentioned above can be accomplished. The structure of this paper is the following. In Sec. 2, the st andard approach to the Boltzmann gas is employed to “derive” a lemma that the distribution function of a collisionless Boltzmann gas, if continuous at the beginning, will keep its value along a molecule’s path. In ap plying the lemma to various situations, we are led to an unexpected conc lusion that strictly continuous and well-behaved distribution functi ons exist only on a theoretical assumption. In Sec 3, we examine two kinds of dis continuous dis- tribution functions. The ﬁrst kind is related to point-like molecular sources 2and the second kind to surface-like molecular sources. It is shown that the solid-angle-average distribution function needs to be int roduced in order to treat discontinuous distribution functions related to the molecular sources. Sec. 4 oﬀers a comprehensive formulation in which both conti nuous and dis- continuous distribution functions are formulated in terms of path-integrals deﬁned by initial-state and boundary conditions. The ﬁnal s ection, Sec. 5, gives a brief survey on essential features of the new formali sm. 2 Evolution of continuous distribution function We suppose in this section that the distribution function of interest is per- fectly continuous, diﬀerentiable in a more exact language, in the position- velocity space ( µ-space). Under this supposition, according to the standard kinetic t heory, the collisionless Boltzmann equation holds and it reads ∂f ∂t+v·∂f ∂r+F m·∂f ∂v= 0, (1) in which the collisional eﬀects between molecules have been disregarded (as the title of this paper has suggested). If the initial state f(t0+ 0,r,v) =f(t0,r,v) (2) and the boundary condition f(t,r,v) =/integraldisplay K(v,v1)f(t,r,v1)dv1, (3) where the shape of Krepresents the collisional eﬀects between molecules and boundaries[6], are regarded as known ones, the solution of Eq. (1) can be constructed by means of a ﬁnite-diﬀerence scheme[3]. In s uch a scheme, notably, the governing equation (1) and the initial and boun dary conditions (2)-(3) constitute a complete equation set, and any additio nal information, such as the path-information of individual molecules, beco mes theoretically dispensable. (In a sense, the whole idea behind introducing the conservation- type partial diﬀerential equations into kinetic theory is j ust to avoid knowing paths of individual molecules.) Instead of making a detailed analysis of the standard formal ism out- lined above, which has been done elsewhere[4], we now use the formalism to “derive” a relatively well-known lemma in statistical mech anics. The point 3here is that the lemma will automatically lead us to the very e ssence of gas dynamics. By relating the vector variables randvin (1) to a molecule’s path, the partial diﬀerential equation can be rewritten in the form of a simple ordinary diﬀerential equation d f dt/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle r(t),v(t)= 0. (4) Of course, r(t) andv(t) are associated with the equations of motion for a single molecule dr(t) dt=v,dv(t) dt=F m, (5) whereFstands for all forces acting upon the molecule. Equation (4) simply means f(t,r,v)\|r(t),v(t)= Constant . (6) That is to say, in the absence of collisions a continuous dist ribution function keeps invariant along a molecular path in µ-space. [Since formula (6) is the integral of (4) along a path, we may regard the formula as a primitive prototype of path-integral approach.] If the time developm ent operator Tis employed to represent the equations of motion (5), namely if we have T(t0,t)[r(t0),v(t0)] = [r(t),v(t)], (7) then we can equivalently express (6) as f(t,r,v) =f(t0,r0,v0) =f(t0,T−1r,T−1v), (8) where r0=r(t0),v0=v(t0) and T−1=T(t,t0). In view of (8) and (6), we will refer to f(t0) as the “source” function and refer to f(t) as the “image” function. In a similar spirit, it will be said that r0is a source point and r an image point. Now, we use the path-invariance expressed by (6) to derive so me dynam- ical features of the Boltzmann gas. These features, though q uite interesting and very essential, received no enough attention before. Fo r simplicity only situations in that no external force exists will be consider ed, though equa- tions (4)-(8) are valid more generally. Suppose, to begin with, that the initial distribution funct ionf(t0,r,v) is known (which is continuous) and we are concerned with the v elocity dis- tribution at a speciﬁc point r, denoted by fr(t,v) hereafter. Equation (8) shows that fr(t,v) =f(t0,T−1r,v). (9) 4For one ﬁxed value of vi=\|vi\|, the source points ri=T−1rsimply form a spherical surface, labeled as Si=S(vi) in Fig. 1. The radius of such a surface can be expressed by \|ri−r\|=vi·(t−t0). (10) To determine the velocity distribution, we must let vitake values from very small to very large, and thus the radius \|r−ri\|varies from very small to very large. This implies that the velocity distribution fr(t,v) is a condensed im- age of the entire spatial space. If f(t0,r,v) is not spatially uniform, fr(t,v) will possess a complex structure, inﬁnitely complex in gene ral situations (which reminds us of the famous Cantor set and many other inte resting structures in the fractal studies). To make the situation ev en more wor- risome, the inference presented above also suggests that an y discontinuous things, if exist in the spatial space, will constantly creat e discontinuous im- ages on velocity distributions in the nearby and distant reg ions (virtually everywhere). To see the point in another perspective, let’s assume that a n umerical work is being carried out and the velocity space is being divi ded into many small but ﬁnite cells (for time being pay less attention to th e spatial space), of which one takes the form ∆ v=v2∆v∆Ω. It is then up to the investigator to determine the distribution function for each of the cells , denoted by fr(t,∆v,∆Ω). (11) In other words, each of fr(t,∆v,∆Ω) should be endowed with one deﬁnite value. The task, though seems quite straightforward, canno t be done con- ventionally. Look at Fig. 2, in which the spatial cone −∆Ω corresponding to the velocity cone ∆Ω, called the eﬀective cone hereafter, and the two spherical surfaces Si=S(vi) and Si+1=S(vi+1), where vi+1−vi= ∆v, are plotted. It is easy to ﬁnd that when vvaries within the range v2∆v∆Ω, the source point T−1rruns over the shaded volume in the ﬁgure. Since the thickness of the shaded volume is proportional to ∆ vsolely (for the ﬁxed t−t0), if we let ∆ vbe smaller and smaller the value of lim ∆v→0fr(t,∆v,Ω) (12) tends to a limit in the usual sense. Whereas, the size of ∆ Si, the area element on S(vi) enclosed by the eﬀective cone, is proportional to v2 i, and if we let ∆Ω be smaller and smaller the value of lim ∆Ω→0fr(t,v,∆Ω) (13) 5tends to a limit at a rate that strongly depends on the magnitu de of v. That is to say, the velocity distribution at ris not uniformly continuous. According to mathematics textbooks[7][8], a function that is not uniformly continuous may involve some irregularities and has to be tre ated carefully. As far as our situation is concerned, there indeed exist diﬃc ult things. As one thing, when viis rather large, the area of ∆ Simust be rather large. If the source function f(t0) on this large area element varies signiﬁcantly (quite possible in practical situations), giving a unique v alue to the image function fr(t,∆v,∆Ω) becomes a tricky business. This type of diﬃculty has been named as quasi-discontinuity in our previous works[4][5]. We now study boundary eﬀects. At ﬁrst suppose, if the path-in variance expressed by (6) is combined with the boundary condition (3) , the boundary eﬀects can be regarded as being formulated completely. The i nvestigation below, however, tells a diﬀerent story. First of all, note th at a realistic boundary cannot be considered as having a geometrically and physically uniform surface. This, according to the spirit of calculus, leaves us no choice but to divide the boundary into many area elements, inﬁnites imally small in the theoretical sense. We are then supposed to examine how ea ch of them receive and emit incident molecules. If we assume that an are a element dSin Fig. 3 uniformly reemit the incident molecules and the dis tribution function immediately above it is known as f(ro,v), it follows from (6) that, assuming the gas to be relatively stationary, f(ro,v) =f(rp1,v) =f(rp2,v). (14) An interesting question must arise. What is the diﬀerence be tween the ve- locity distributions at p1and at p2? Fig. 3b oﬀers manifestation that the velocity distribution at p1takes the value of f(ro,v) within the solid-angle range dΩ1while the velocity distribution at p2takes the same value within dΩ2. An essential fact is that the inﬁnitesimally small dΩ1is signiﬁcantly larger than the inﬁnitesimally small dΩ2. It is then rather obvious that equa- tion (14) alone cannot be deemed as a satisfactory descripti on of the process. (The next section shows that introducing δ-functions into the scheme does not provide much help either.) We have seen that the path-invariance lemma, though intende d to de- scribe the evolution of continuous distribution function, discloses many fea- tures that cannot be well treated in terms of continuous dist ribution func- tions. Before ﬁnishing this section and turning our attention to th e next sub- ject, we wish to comment on the diﬀerences between the Boltzm ann-equation 6approach and the approach represented by formulas (4)-(8), though it seems that formula (4) or (6) is “derived from” and “completely equ ivalent to” the collisionless Boltzmann equation (1). According to most textbooks, the derivation of the Boltzman n equation is closely related to the conservation law in the phase space µ-space[1]. Ref. 4 and Ref. 5, however, argue that such a conservation law is no t truly sound. On one hand, deﬁning ﬂuxes through ﬁve-dimensional h ypersurfaces (six of them can enclose a six-dimensional volume element) i s an absolute must for the conservation law; on the other hand, such ﬂuxes c annot be well deﬁned in either physical or mathematical sense. For in stance, in deﬁn- ing a ﬂux through the ordinary surface dydz we invoke that the velocity ˙x=vxis perpendicular to the surface; whereas in deﬁning a ﬂux thr ough the hypersurface dvxdvydvzdydzwe cannot invoke that the velocity ˙ x=vx is perpendicular to the hypersurface, because vxitself is among the ﬁve dimensions of the hypersurface. Formula (4) can be derived independently through a Jacobian approach under two assumptions[1][2]. One is that the distribution f unction is per- fectly continuous at an initial time. The other is that force s acting on all molecules are free from dissipation (independent of speed) and free from ﬂuctuation (smooth everywhere). After obtaining (4), equa tion (1) can be obtained by abandoning the path-information expressed by e quation (5). Noting that the abandonment involves an information loss, w e wish to say that the approach represented by (4)-(8), instead of the col lisionless Boltz- mann equation (1), should be regarded as a more basic and more complete formalism. The discussion of this section, in which express ions (4)-(8), in- stead of (1), reveal the essential features of continuous di stribution function, also substantiates the statement presented above. The standard kinetic theory gets heritages from the ordinar y ﬂuid me- chanics. It assumes that a local value of distribution funct ion is largely inﬂu- enced by its immediate neighborhood and the inﬂuence is exer ted through two-dimensional surfaces or ﬁve-dimensional hypersurfac es. By adopting this assumption, the theory unanimously employs a conserva tion-type par- tial diﬀerential equation to set up its framework. Formulas (4)-(8), however, suggest that events of gas dynamics develop along molecular paths, which are one-dimensional lines in µ-space. The new picture, quite diﬀerent from the standard one in the physical and mathematical senses, im plies that even a gas that initially possesses a perfectly continuous distr ibution function will not behave itself like a continuous medium. We have manifest ly seen this point in the discussion related to the quasi-discontinuity . 7Finally, formulas (4)-(8) oﬀer, in a primitive manner thoug h, diﬀerent concepts concerning the way we approach to gas dynamics. Ins tead of rely- ing on comprehensive, but diﬃcult and delicate, diﬀerentia l equations, one is virtually led to accepting a procedure-type approach. Su ch approach sup- posedly includes the following steps: (i) to determine path s of individual molecules; (ii) to formulate how a local distribution funct ion gives a contri- bution to another local distribution function through a pat h; (iii) to integrate all contributions associated with all possible molecular p aths. The last step is necessary since, according to the basic principles of sta tistical mechanics, molecular paths must involve a probabilistic nature due to t he molecule- boundary and molecule-molecule interaction. (All points i n this paper are given in terms of classical mechanics.) We will, by followin g Feynman[9], call an approach of this type the path-integral approach. 3 Evolution of discontinuous distribution function The last section has shown that the Boltzmann gas should be re garded less as a perfectly continuous medium and more as a special co llection of individual molecules. In this section we will formulate how discontinuous distribution functions, each of which describes a set of mol ecules, develop along molecular paths. For simplicity only discontinuous distribution functions that are pro- duced by point-like sources and surface-like sources are of our interest. It is also assumed that molecules of the interested gases are fr ee from exter- nal forces. If needed, the approach here can, in a straightfo rward way, be adapted to more general situations. In Fig. 4, a point r0is plotted at which molecules are generated (for whatever reasons). To make the discussion applicable later , the molecular emission rate ρis allowed to depend on the time, velocity magnitude and velocity direction. The number of molecular emission can th us be expressed by ρ(t0,r0,v,Ω0)dt0dvdΩ0, (15) where Ω 0is deﬁned in the frame whose origin is at r0. Moving along a molecule’s path, it is found that at a later time tthe emitted molecules spread over the volume \|r−r0\|2vdtdΩ0 (16) 8where ris the point in the spatial space such that r−r0=v(t−t0). (17) It follows from (15) and (16) that the density of molecules at ris n(r) =ρdvdt 0dΩ0 \|r−r0\|2vdtdΩ0=ρdv \|r−r0\|2v, (18) where dt=dt0has been understood. Since the distribution function fat the point rsatisﬁes /integraldisplay Ωfv2dvdΩ =n(r) =ρdv \|r−r0\|2v, (19) the distribution function produced by the point-like sourc e is f(t,r,v,Ω) =ρ(t0,r0,v,Ω0) \|r−r0\|2v3δ(Ω−Ω0). (20) Note that Ω 0in (20) takes the same direction as that of ( r−r0). The form of (20) manifests that molecules produced by a point-like sour ce are associated with a discontinuous distribution function. If one tries to apply the Boltz- mann equation (1) to it, diﬃculties arise sharply with the di ﬀerentiation operations. Now, we consider a surface-like source of molecules. It seem s that after the surface is divided into many small area elements and the f ormula Eq. (20) is applied to each of them, our task is virtually accompl ished. However, the following discussion shows that if we stick to what the st andard kinetic theory implies, more troublesome things will emerge and no p rogress can be made. Let ∆ S0idenote one of area elements on the surface and η(t0,r0,v,Ω0) denote the molecular emission rate per unit area on ∆ S0i. By identifying η(t0,r0,v,Ω0)∆S0i (21) with the molecular emission rate ρin (20), we ﬁnd the entire distribution function produced by the surface-like source to be f(t,r,v,Ω) =/summationdisplay iη∆S0i \|r−r0i\|2v3δ(Ω−Ω0i), (22) 9where iruns over all the elements on the surface. If one rewrites (22 ) in the integral form f(t,r,v,Ω) =/integraldisplayηdS0 \|r−r0\|2v3δ(Ω−Ω0), (23) the following question will be of the immediate concern. Doe s equation (23) deﬁne a normally behaved distribution function? Fig. 5 demo nstrates that each of Ω 0points to a diﬀerent direction while the distribution funct ion on the left side of (23) involves only one direction deﬁned by Ω. That is to say, expression (23) cannot be integrated in the usual sense. It is quite interesting to look at the peculiarities that we h ave just en- countered. In dealing with our discontinuous distribution functions neither the usual diﬀerentiation nor the usual integration works sm oothly. In order to ﬁnd a way out of the diﬃcult situation, we propose t o use the following solid-angle-average distribution function such that if the exact distribution function f(t,r,v) is known, which exists only in a pure academic sense, then the average distribution function is ¯f(t,r,v,∆Ω) =1 ∆Ω/integraldisplay ∆Ωf(t,r,v)dΩ, (24) where ∆Ω is a solid-angle range in the velocity space set by th e investigator. In practical calculations, it is convenient to employ the sp herical coordi- nate system of velocity, in which Ω is deﬁned by the polar angl eθand the azimuthal angle φ, and the solid angle range can be expressed by ∆Ω≈sinθ∆θ∆φ. (25) On this understanding, the entire solid-angle range of velo city associated with a spatial point ris divided into a large number of small, but ﬁnite, ranges, which may or may not be equal to each other. Of course, if the distribution function is smooth enough and ∆Ω is suﬃciently small, we may simply assume ¯f(t,r,v,∆Ω) = f(t,r,v,Ω). (26) In the rest of this paper, we will always omit the bar notation when referring to such distribution function. In terms of practical calculations, the size of ∆Ω should be c hosen prop- erly so that the computational work can be done eﬃciently and at the same time no signiﬁcant macroscopic phenomena will be overlooke d. As we may notice, an investigator of numerical work can take a sim- ilar strategy to treat distribution functions in terms of ∆ rand ∆ v. The 10diﬀerence here lies in that our solid-angle-average distri bution function is introduced in a theoretical (analytical) consideration: t he discontinuity rep- resented by (20) and the quasi-discontinuity represented b y (13) should, and have to, be handled under the new deﬁnition. It is rather important to emphasize that the distribution fu nction intro- duced above seems to be an “approximate” one, but it actually represents an “accurate” approach in the following two senses. One is that by letting ∆Ω be suﬃciently small, we can describe a statistical process w ith any desirable accuracy. The other is that errors related to giving up the ex act distribution function are largely inherent to nature not to the way we appr oach to it. With help of the new average distribution function, the dete rministic nature and the probabilistic nature of a statistical proces s can be kept in a balanced way. By using all kinds of mathematical operation s, such as diﬀerentiation and integration, to formulate the distribu tion function, we preserve the macroscopic causality. By taking the solid-an gle average, some of the microscopic information, in particular those relate d to discontinuity and quasi-discontinuity, are forsaken forever. We are now equipped to formulate the discontinuous distribu tion func- tion due to the existence of a surface-like source, as shown i n Fig. 6. For a chosen solid-angle range ∆Ω in the velocity space there is a n eﬀective cone −∆Ω in the spatial space. A surface-like molecular source enc losed by the eﬀective cone, the shaded area ∆ Sin Fig. 6, gives contributions to f(t,r,v,∆Ω). Assuming the emission rate on the surface to be known and allo wing expression (23), not normally behaved though, to represent the emitted molecules, we obtain from (24) f=1 ∆Ω/integraldisplay /integraldisplay ∆SηdS0 \|r−r0\|2v3δ(Ω−Ω0)dΩ. (27) By exchanging the order of the integration, we ﬁnally arrive at f(t,r,v,∆Ω) =1 ∆Ω/integraldisplay ∆Sη(t0,r0,v,Ω0)dS0 \|r−r0\|2v3. (28) In the integrand of (28) r0is the position of dS0,t0is equal to t− \|r−r0\|/v and Ω 0points to the direction of ( r−r0). It is easy to see that the distribution function expressed by (28) is ﬁnite and well behaved. 114 The complete path-integral formulation and its application The discussion in the last two sections has shown that the dis tribution func- tion at any speciﬁc point consists of two parts. The ﬁrst part is a continuous one produced by the continuous distribution function exist ing previously; the second part is a discontinuous one produced by surface-l ike molecular sources. Here, we summarize the last two sections and give a c omprehensive formulation for the dynamics of collisionless Boltzmann ga s. In Fig. 7 we assume that the complete solid-angle-average di stribution function f(t,r,v,∆Ω) is aﬀected by a continuous distribution function and a surface-like source. Both the “sources” exist within the e ﬀective cone and constantly “emit” molecules into the region around the p ointr. The complete distribution function can formally be expressed a s f(t,r,v,∆Ω) = f(i)+f(ii), (29) where f(i)andf(ii)are produced by the aforementioned two sources respec- tively. First, we wish to determine f(i)in terms of certain speciﬁcations of ini- tial state. Providing the initial state of the continuous di stribution function, denoted by fct, is given only at one speciﬁc moment t0, we have no other choices but to take the following approach. All relevant sou rce points, ac- cording to Sec. 2, can be determined by the mapping T−1rand by the eﬀective cone −∆Ω. Namely, they distribute on an area element of the spherical surface \|r0−r\|=v(t−t0), denoted by ∆ S1in Fig. 7. We will refer to such area element as a virtual eﬀective surface in view of t hat similar surface-like sources (boundaries) are physical ones. From (6) and (24), the continuous part of the distribution function can be written as an integral f(i)(t,r,v,∆Ω) =1 ∆Ω/integraldisplay ∆Ωfct(t,r,v,Ω)dΩ =1 \|r−r0\|2∆Ω/integraldisplay ∆S1fct(t0,r0,v,Ω0)Ur0rdS0(30) where r0is the position of dS0, Ω0is in the direction ( r−r0), and Ur0ris a specially deﬁned path-clearness function such that Ur0r=/braceleftBigg 1 no block along the path from r0tor 0 otherwise .(31) 12Note that the diﬃculty of quasi-discontinuity discussed in Sec. 2 is no longer an issue: f(i)is uniquely deﬁned and makes appropriate physical sense no matter how dynamically the source function fct(t0) varies on the virtual eﬀective surface ∆ S1. If the distribution function is known within a period of time (before t), we have freedom to choose the virtual eﬀective surface. For i nstance, by choosing the surface ∆ S′ 1in Fig. 7, we have, as an alternative of (30), f(i)=1 ∆Ω/integraldisplay ∆S′ 1fct(t0,r0,v,Ω0)Ur0r \|r−r0\|2\|cosα\|dS0, (32) where αis the angle between the direction ( r−r0) and the normal of the area element dS0, and the time t0now depends on the position of dS0, namely t0=t− \|r−r0\|/v. Then, we wish to formulate the discontinuous part of the dist ribution function. As suggested in the last two sections, boundary su rfaces in a gas can be treated as surface-like molecular sources, since the y constantly reemit incident molecules. In Fig. 7, the boundary surface ∆ S2within the eﬀective cone, called the physical eﬀective surface, is singled out a s a surface-like source that can aﬀect f(t,r,v,∆Ω). The focus is naturally on the local emission rate η(t0,r0,v,Ω0) deﬁned by (21). To determine it, we ﬁrst consider the falling rate of in cident molecules expressed by ξ(t0,r0,vi,Ωi) =f(t0,r0,vi,Ωi)cosθiU(cosθi), (33) where θiis the angle between the inward normal of the local surface an d the incident direction of the molecules and Uis a step function whose value is equal to unity if cos θi>0 and equal to zero otherwise. As well known, the functional relation between ηandξhas to be ulti- mately measured in experiments[6], though some kinds of the oretical models may be of use at some stages. To see how this relation can be for mulated empirically, consider a molecule that moves with the veloci ty (vi,Ωi), strikes an area element and leaves the area element with a velocity wi thin the range dvdΩ0, with respect to the surface element, in a certain probabili ty. If the probability is denoted by P(vi,Ωi,v,Ω0)dvdΩ0 (34) and its normalization takes the form/integraldisplay P(vi,Ωi,v,Ω0)dvdΩ0= 1, (35) 13then the emission rate of the area element, for rareﬁed gases , will satisfy η(t0,r0,v,Ω0) =/integraldisplay P(vi,Ωi,v,Ω0)ξv2 idvidΩi. (36) To verify the correctness of (36), one may integrate (36) and obtain, with the help of (35), dt0dS0/integraldisplay η(t0,r0,v,Ω0)dvdΩ0=dt0dS0/integraldisplay ξ(t0,r0,vi,Ωi)v2 idvidΩi,(37) which is nothing but the conservation law of the molecular nu mber on the surface element. It is now clear that the purpose of such expe riment should be to determine the functional form of P(vi,Ωi,v,Ω0). Under the assumption that the molecular emission rate ηof the involved boundary surface has been determined (by whatever means), t he interested discontinuous part can, by virtue of Eq. (28), be written as f(ii)=1 ∆Ω/integraldisplay ∆S2η(t0,r0,v,Ω0)dS0 \|r−r0\|2v3Ur0r, (38) where the path-clearness function Ur0rhas been deﬁned by (31). The ﬁnal result is then f(t,r,v,∆Ω) =1 ∆Ω/integraldisplay ∆S′ 1fct(t0,r0,v,Ω0)\|cosα\| \|r−r0\|2Ur0rdS0 +1 ∆Ω/integraldisplay ∆S2η(t0,r0,v,Ω0) \|r−r0\|2v3Ur0rdS0,(39) where the ﬁrst term of the right side can be replaced by (30). I f macroscopic quantities are of interest, the distribution function expr essed by (39) can be used as a conventional one. At this point, it is interesting to comment on the time-irrev ersibility of the formalism given above. It is kind of well-known that th e time- reversibility dilemma related to a dynamical process can be eliminated if a proper statistical average is taken. With the statistical average, two is- sues get involved. (i) Some pieces of microscopic informati on are forsaken. (ii) Conservative basic forces are converted into ﬂuctuati ng and dissipative (speed-dependent) forces. Notably, the second issue menti oned above is di- rectly responsible for the time-irreversibility of the int erested process. In this approach, it appears that the time-irreversibility has nic ely been embedded. Though the pure evolution of continuous distribution funct ion expressed by 14(6) or (8) is time-reversible, other treatments, including the deﬁnition of the solid-angle-average distribution function and the for mulation of bound- ary eﬀects, are manifestly time-irreversible. In particul ar, by allowing the molecule-boundary interaction to be determined by empiric al laws (or other adequate statistical laws), the formulation in this paper i s fully in harmony with the Langevin theory[10], in which ﬂuctuating and dissi pative forces nat- urally arise from the interaction between a moving body and i ts surrounding molecules. At the end of this section, we give a brief look at what will hap pen if a calculation suggested by this paper is practically perf ormed. Fig. 8 oﬀers schematic of a gas leaking out of a large container thro ugh a small hole. (Ref. 4 shows that the standard theory encounters many diﬃculties in treating the case.) Since the container is rather large one m ay assume that the distribution function on a surface, labeled as Sin the ﬁgure, constantly takes the value f=n0/parenleftbiggm 2πκT/parenrightbigg3/2 exp/parenleftBigg −mv2 2κT/parenrightBigg , (40) provided that the surface Sis not very close to the hole. It is obvious that the values of distribution function at the starting points o f paths 1,2 and 3 are all equal to the value of (40). If contributions from comp lex paths, such as path 3, are neglected, we can directly use an ordinary PC-t ype computer to calculate (39) on the understanding that the molecular em ission rate η in the formulation has been determined empirically. 5 Conclusion We have set up a new formalism that exhibits many features str ongly dif- ferent from those related to the standard theory. They can br ieﬂy be listed as the following. 1. Instead of pursuing the exact distribution function, a sp ecial type of distribution function, called the solid-angle-average di stribution func- tion, is introduced. The new-type distribution function ca n describe statistical phenomena with any desirable accuracy. 2. Instead of relying on a partial diﬀerential equation, whi ch is diﬃcult and delicate, the new approach gives a set of tamable integra l formulas. As well known, for a law of nature the integral formulation of ten enjoys advantages. 153. Instead of disregarding the path-information, the new ap proach bases its formulation on the path-information of molecules. With the path- information included, many sophisticated and important fe atures of kinetic systems become explicable and treatable. 4. Instead of treating the collisionless Boltzmann gas as a c ompletely continuous medium, the new approach treats the discontinui ty and quasi-discontinuity at the very beginning. No singularity of any type exists with the ﬁnal result of the formalism. 5. Instead of falling into the time-reversibility paradox, the new approach admits its inability to formulate all microscopic details. In treating boundary eﬀects, the time irreversibility has explicitly b een embedded in the formalism. The complete dynamics of the Boltzmann gas, including colli sional ef- fects, will be formulated in diﬀerent works[5][11]. Helpfu l discussion with Prof. Keying Guan is greatly appreciated. This work is partl y supported by the fund provided by Education Ministry, PRC. References [1] F. Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics , (McGraw- Hill book Company, 1965). [2] E.G. Harris, Introduction to Modern Theoretical Physics , (John Wiley and Sons, 1975). [3] O.M. Belotserkovskii, Computational Experiment: Direct Numerical Simulation of Complex Gas-dynamics Flows on the Basis of Eul er, Navier-Stokes, and Boltzmann Models , inNumerical Methods in Fluid Dynamical Physics edited by H.J. Wirz and J.J. Smolderen, p378, (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1978). [4] C.Y. Chen, Singularities in Kinetic Theory , to be published. [5] C.Y. Chen, Perturbation Method and Statistical Theories , in English (International Academic Publisher, Beijing, 1999). [6] M.N. Kogan, Rareﬁed Gas Dynamics , (Plenum Press, New York, 1969). 16[7] W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis , 3rd ed., (McGraw-Hill, 1976). [8] B.R. Gelbaum and J.M.H. Olmsted Counterexamples in Analysis , (Holden-Day, Inc., 1964). [9] R.P. Feynman and A.R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , (McGraw-Hill, 1965). [10] See for instance R.K. Pathria, Statistical Mechanics , (Pergamon Press, 1972) in which a body immersed in a gas is investigated in term s of Brownian motion of molecules. [11] C.Y. Chen, A Path-integral Approach to the Collisional Boltzmann Gas , to be published. 17Figure captions 1. Local distribution as an image of the entire space. 2. Source points aﬀecting the local distribution within v2∆Ω∆v. 3. Local distributions near an area element. 4. A point-like molecular source. 5. Schematic of discontinuous distribution produced by a su rface-like source. 6. A surface-like molecular source within an eﬀective cone. 7. One physical surface and two virtual surfaces within an eﬀ ective cone. 8. Molecules leaking out of a large container. 18Figure 1 S1S2Si ry x✲✻
arXiv:physics/0006034v1 [physics.optics] 13 Jun 2000Comment on ”Observation of Superluminal Behaviors in Wave P ropagation” Murray Peshkin Argonne National Laboratory Physics Division-203 Argonne, IL 60439-4843 peshkin@anl.gov Mugnai etal.[1] have reported an experiment in which microwave packets a ppear to travel in air with a speed substantially greater than c, the normal speed of light in vacuum. The packets consist of square pulses, many wavelengths in exten t, which are chopped segments of the Bessel beam J0(ρk sinθ ) exp/braceleftBig i(zkcosθ −ωt)/bracerightBig (1) moving in the zdirection, where θis a parameter around 20◦,ρis the cylindrical radial variable,J0is the Bessel function, and ω=kc. The authors found experimentally that signals moved in the zdirection with speed equal to vexp=c/cosθ, (2) a superluminal speed that they assert agrees with the group v elocity derived from Eq. (1). Putting aside the experimental result, I point out here that Eq. (2) is not correct. It disagrees with the wave equation 1 c2∂2ψ ∂t2=∇2ψ, (3) which gives a group velocity vg=ccosθ (4) for the Bessel beam of Eq. (1). Therefore, the reported exper imental result cannot be reconciled with the Maxwell equations. If the experiment is correct, the Maxwell equations in the laboratory system are grossly in error at microwave fr equencies, independently of any considerations of relativity theory. Consider a wave packet ψ(z,ρ,t) =1√ 2π/integraldisplay dkρdkzA(kz,kρ)J0(ρkρ) exp/braceleftBig i(zkz−ω(kz,kρ)t)/bracerightBig . (5) The wave equation requires ω(kz,kρ) =c/radicalBig k2z+k2ρ. (6) 1The ”center of gravity” of the wave packet is given by /an}b∇acketle{tz/an}b∇acket∇i}htt=1 2π/integraldisplay dkρdkzdKρdKzA(Kz,Kρ)∗A(kz,kρ)exp/braceleftBig iω(Kz,Kρ)t/bracerightBig exp/braceleftBig −iω(kz,kρ)t/bracerightBig (7) ×/bracketleftBig ρdρJ 0(Kρρ)J0(kρρ)/bracketrightBig ×/bracketleftBig dzexp{iKzz}zexp{−ikzz}/bracketrightBig . Carrying out the ρandzintegrals gives δ(Kρ−kρ)(−2πi)δ′(Kz−kz) and then carrying out the twoKintegrals gives /an}b∇acketle{tz/an}b∇acket∇i}htt=−i/integraldisplay∂A(kz,kρ)∗ ∂kzA(kz,kρ)dkzdkρ+t/integraldisplay∂ω(k,K) ∂k/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleA(kz,kρ)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2dkzdkρ=/an}b∇acketle{tz/an}b∇acket∇i}ht0+/angbracketleftBig vg/angbracketrightBig t, (8) where the group velocity is given by vg=∂ω(k,K) ∂k=kc√ k2+K2≤c. (9) For the Bessel beam of Ref. [1], the right-hand side of Eq. (9) is equal to the constant cosθand so a pulse of any shape moves with group velocity equal to ccosθ and not with the superluminal velocity given in Eq. (2). In particular, a n initial delta-function pulse will move with the same group velocity. In the absence of dispersi on, the delta function will not spread as it progresses, so the signal velocity is also equal toccosθ. This work was supported by the U.S. Departmentof Energy, Nuc lear Physics Division, under contract W-31-109-ENG-38. REFERENCES [1] D. Mugnai, A. Ranfagni, and R. Ruggeri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4830 (2000). 2
1 A. Photon findings B. Author name: Víctor M. Urbina Bolland C. Affiliation: Química Foliar S.A. de C.V. Avenida Urbina No. 4, Parque Industrial Naucalpan Naucalpan, Estado de México. C.P:53489. México Tel: (52) 5300 3571, Fax: (52) 53 01 0863 E-mail: qfoliar@mail.internet.com.mx http://light.hinet.com.mx D. Receipt date: 13/06/2000 E. Abstract: Two experiments were made using a microwav e generator, which sent a narrow beam, through a metallic plate with horizontal movement. At the other end a horn antenna coupled to a field-strength detector. In linear polarization double cycloids paths were found and in circular polarization spiral pat hs were found. These experiments suggested that the photon is composed by two particles in dynamic equilibrium. The description of this model is given later as well as its parameters. F. Rev A 1, 062913 (2000) 1.PHOTON FINDINGS A. Linear polarization exp eriment: For this experiment a Gunn diode oscillator was used coupled to a resonant cavity which frequency was adjusted to 10.5 Ghz, 2.855 cm wavelength without modulation, focused by a parabolic antenna. 2 A horizontal movement system with a metallic plate was installed with the edge at the center of the microwave beam, measuring every millimeter, as seen in FIG. 1 2Transmitter Parabolic antenna Metalic plateHorn antenna Field-strength meter FIG. 1 experiment diagram Obtaining the following results (Table I): Displacement in Cm Field strength uW Displacement in Cm Field strength uW 10 46 11.3 46 10.1 46 11.4 47 10.2 43 11.5 46 10.3 38 11.6 43 10.4 32 11.7 39 10.5 19 11.8 35 10.6 9 11.9 28 10.7 8 12 16 10.8 16 12.1 7 10.9 26 12.2 8 11.0 35 12.3 18 11.1 39 12.4 30 11.2 42 12.5 36 12.6 41 Table I: Data obtained 3 These results were plotted where the horizontal axis coincide with the movement of the plate in centimeters and vertically the field strength in microwatts FIG.2: FIG.2 Graphic In this graphic it is clearly observed that the tr ajectories are not senoidals but coincides exactly with the empty spaces of the plate following double cycloidal paths FIG.3, which are generated by a spinning wheel, which the tangential speed is the same as its translational speed. It is interesting to o bserve that the peaks of minimum power coincide exactly with half of the wavelength, which is 1.4 cm. It is demonstrated that the path of the electromagnetic radiations is not senoidal. Instead, the trajectories are cycloidal in plane polarization. The sim ple harmonic movement generates this path. 0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00 88.5 99.5 1010.5 1111.5 1212.5 1313.5 1414.5 1515.5 1616.5 EXPERIMENTAL DATA CYCLOID 1 CYCLOID 2C u FIG.3 Double cycloid 0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00 88.5 99.5 1010.5 1111.5 1212.5 1313.5 1414.5 1515.5 1616.5 Cu 4 B. Circular polarization experiment: In this experiment the same equipment was used but instead of the parabolic antenna, two helical antennas were used. The e dge of the metallic plate at the center of the beam and was moved horizontally every millimeter, measuring the field strength. As shown in FIG.4 FIG.4 Second experiment diagram Obtaining the following results (Table II): Displacement in mm Field strength in uW Displacement in mm Field strength in uW 8 0 21 1 9 1 22 2 10 2.5 23 2.5 11 4.5 24 4 12 8 25 5.5 13 10 26 7 14 12.5 27 11 15 13 28 12.5 16 11.5 29 13 17 10 30 11.5 18 7 31 9 19 4 32 7.5 20 2 33 5 34 3 Table II. Second experiment data obtained Helical antenna Helical antenna 5 Plotting in X axis distance in millimeters and the filed strength in Y axis (microwatts) FIG.5 was obtained: 02468101214 x -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Displacement in mmField strength in uW FIG.5 Circular polarization The two dimensional projection of two spiral trajectories is two senoidal figures and if the previous graph is overlapped, the following figure is obtained. FIG.8 051015202530 x-20-15-10 -5 05101520253035404550 Horizontal displacement in mmField strength in uW FIG.6 Helical trajectories These experiments suggest the following photon model: 6 C. Proposed photon model Consider, in dynamic equilibrium, a photon formed by two particles whose electric charges are opposed, and for this reason they attract each other. This attraction is equilibrated by the centrifugal force generated when rotating one with the other. (See FIG. 7). By rotating electrical charged particles, a perpendicular magnetic field is generated, also perpendicular to a stationary observer. FIG.7 Photo n model Charge khcqp= (1) h = Planck Constant (.sec10626.634joules−× ) c = Light velocity in vacuum (sm810998.2× ) k = Coulomb constant (22 910897.8CNm× ) Following are definitions of the considered phot on: 1. Distance between particles : It is exactly the wavelength divided by p(3.1416): pl=d (2) 72. : C = (810.2 (3) Particle mass It is relativistic; in other words, depends on its frequency. Individual particle mass is equally Individual particle mass: 2 2 2Chf= (4) 4. Particle charge : It is calculated equaling centrifugal force to the electrostatic attraction force as follows: 22 2 4 2 rqkrmC= (5) hence krmcq2 22= (6) Since 2Chfm= (7) Replacing (7) in (6): khfrq22= But lfC= (8) and rpl2= (9) Hence rfcp2= therefore p2cfr= Then khCqp=2 therefore khCqp= A constant value is obtained, by substituting the values: ( )( ) ( )98 34 10987.81459.310998.21026.6 ×× ×=− q (10) Coulombs q1810653.2−× = This charge if 16.558 times an electron charge. 8 5. System energy : It is the sum of translational kinetic energy plus rotational kinetic energy and it is expressed: Total energy: kinetic rotacional kineticnal translatio totalE EE − −+ = kr ktEEE += (11) 222 2 21 21mcmc Ekt= ××= (12) 222 2 21 21wwII Ekr= ××= (13) The moment of inerti a for a particle body is: 2mrI= (14) By substituting equation (14) into (13): 222wmrEkr= And since the particle tangential velocity equals c, then: 2 22c r=w hence 22mcEkr= By substituting in (11): 222 2mcmcE += Which yields the well -known equation: 2mcE= This equation would not be obtained if the photon was a single particle. 9 6. Trajectories : It is variable, depending on polarization; if polarization is linear, the gyration plane coincides with the translational displacement, forming cycloidal trajectories. When the translational movement is perpendicular to the rotation plane, then the trajectory is in spiral, called circular polarization . Any intermediate position will produce an elliptical polarization. (FIG.8). Linear polarization Circular polarization Eliptical polarization FIG.8 Different trajectories 10 D. GLOSSARY m Photon mass c light velocity in vacuum (sm810998.2×) r particle radius of gyration k Coulomb constant ( 22910897.8CNm× ) f frequency, Hz. l wavelength, m. h Planck constant ( .sec3410626.6joules−× ) p 3.1416 q pa rticle charge ( Coulombs1810653.2−× ) E energy in Joules. d distance between particles (2r) Ekt translational kinetic energy, Joules. Ekr rotational kinetic energy, Joules. I inertia moment 2mKg⋅ w angular velocity, rad / sec.
arXiv:physics/0006036v1 [physics.gen-ph] 15 Jun 2000Whence the Gauge Fields arise G. Quznetsov gunn@yahoo.com January 10, 2014 Abstract A gauge ﬁelds (and massive, too) arise from the production of the probability by the spinors. I use the following notation: 12=/bracketleftigg 1 0 0 1/bracketrightigg ,02=/bracketleftigg 0 0 0 0/bracketrightigg , σx=/bracketleftigg 0 1 1 0/bracketrightigg ,σy=/bracketleftigg 0−i i0/bracketrightigg ,σz=/bracketleftigg 1 0 0−1/bracketrightigg , β1=/bracketleftigg σx02 02−σx/bracketrightigg ,β2=/bracketleftigg σy02 02−σy/bracketrightigg ,β3=/bracketleftigg σz02 02−σz/bracketrightigg , β4=i·/bracketleftigg 0212 −1202/bracketrightigg ,β0=/bracketleftigg 1202 0212/bracketrightigg = 14,γ0=/bracketleftigg 0212 1202/bracketrightigg =β5, γ5=/bracketleftigg 1202 02−12/bracketrightigg ,04=/bracketleftigg 0202 0202/bracketrightigg , Hereβ1,β2,β3,β4,γ0are all ﬁve members of the light Cliﬀord pentad [2],[1] and γ5=i·γ0·β4, 11 The probability current vector Let /an}bracketle{tρ,jx,jy,jz/an}bracketri}ht be a probability current vector and ψbe any complex 4-spinor: ψ=\|ψ\| · exp (i·g)·cos (b)·cos (a) exp (i·d)·sin (b)·cos (a) exp (i·f)·cos (v)·sin (a) exp (i·q)·sin (v)·sin (a) . In this case the following system of equations   ψ†·ψ=ρ, ψ†·β1·ψ=jx, ψ†·β2·ψ=jy, ψ†·β3·ψ=jz/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(1) has got the following type:   ψ†·ψ=ρ, \|ψ\|2·/parenleftigg cos2(a)·sin (2 ·b)·cos (d−g)− −sin2(a)·sin (2 ·v)·cos (q−f)/parenrightigg =jx, \|ψ\|2·/parenleftigg cos2(a)·sin (2 ·b)·sin (d−g)− −sin2(a)·sin (2 ·v)·sin (q−f)/parenrightigg =jy, \|ψ\|2·/parenleftig cos2(a)·cos (2 ·b)−sin2(a)·cos (2 ·v)/parenrightig =jz/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle. Hence for every probability current vector /an}bracketle{tρ,jx,jy,jz/an}bracketri}ht: the spinor ψ, obeyed to this system, exists. If j=ρ·u thenuis the average velocity. The light pentad contains β4,γ0besidesβ1,β2,β3and yet two components of velocity can be deﬁned as the following: jξ=ψ†·γ0·ψ,jκ=ψ†·β4·ψ,jξ=ρ·uξ·ψ,jκ=ρ·uκ. 2In this case: uξ= sin (2 ·a)·[cos (b)·cos (v)·cos (g−f) + sin (b)·sin (v)·cos (d−q)] , uκ= sin (2 ·a)·[cos (b)·cos (v)·sin (g−f) + sin (b)·sin (v)·sin (d−q)] ; and: u2 x+u2 y+u2 z+u2 ξ+u2 κ= 1. Hence for the completeness, yet two ”space” coordinates ξandκshould be added to our three x,y,z . 2 The Hamiltonian The operator/hatwideU(t,△t), which acts in the set of these spinors, is denoted as the evolution operator for the spinor ψ(t,x), if: ψ(t+△t,x) =/hatwideU(t,△t)ψ(t,x) . /hatwideU(t,△t) is a linear operator. The set of the spinors, for which/hatwideU(t,△t) is the evolution operator, is denoted as the operator/hatwideU(t,△t) space. The operator space is the linear space. Let for an inﬁnitesimal △t: /hatwideU(t,△t) = 1 + △t·i·/hatwiderH(t) . Hence for an elements of the operator/hatwideU(t,△t) space: i·/hatwiderH=∂t. Since the functions ρ,jx,jy,jzfulﬁll to the continuity equation: ∂tρ+∂xjx+∂yjy+∂zjz= 0 then: /parenleftig/parenleftig ∂tψ†/parenrightig ·β0+/parenleftig ∂xψ†/parenrightig ·β1+/parenleftig ∂yψ†/parenrightig ·β2+/parenleftig ∂zψ†/parenrightig ·β3/parenrightig ·ψ= =−ψ†·((β0·∂t+β1·∂x+β2·∂y+β3·∂z)ψ). 3Let: /hatwideQ=/parenleftig i·/hatwiderH+β1·∂x+β2·∂y+β3·∂z/parenrightig . Hence: ψ†·/hatwideQ†·ψ=−ψ†·/hatwideQ·ψ. Thereforei·/hatwideQis the Hermitean operator. Therefore: /hatwiderH=β1·(i·∂x) +β2·(i·∂y) +β3·(i·∂z)−i·/hatwideQ. Let −i·/hatwideQ=  ϕ1,1ϕ1,2+i·̟1,2ϕ1,3+i·̟1,3ϕ1,4+i·̟1,4 ϕ1,2−i·̟1,2ϕ2,2ϕ2,3+i·̟2,3ϕ2,4+i·̟2,4 ϕ1,3−i·̟1,3ϕ2,3−i·̟2,3ϕ3,3ϕ3,4+i·̟3,4 ϕ1,4−i·̟1,4ϕ2,4−i·̟2,4ϕ3,4−i·̟3,4ϕ4,4 , here allϕi,jand̟i,jare a real functions on R2+3+1. In this paper I consider the case with: ϕ1,4+i·̟1,4= 0, ϕ2,3+i·̟2,3= 0, ϕ1,3+i·̟1,3=ϕ2,4+i·̟2,4, that is the electroweak part of SM [1], only. LetGt,Gz,KtandKzare the solution of the following system of equa- tions:   Gt+Gz+Kt+Kz=ϕ1,1, Gt−Gz+Kt−Kz=ϕ2,2, Gt−Gz−Kt+Kz=ϕ3,3, Gt+Gz−Kt−Kz=ϕ4,4;/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle GxandKxare the solution of the following system of equations: 4/braceleftigg Gx+Kx=ϕ1,2, −Gx+Kx=ϕ3,4;/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle GyandKyare the solution of the following system of equations: /braceleftigg −Gy−Ky=̟1,2, Gy−Kx=̟3,4./vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle In this case: −i·/hatwideQ= = (Gt·β0+Gx·β1+Gy·β2+Gz·β3)+ + (Kt·β0+Kx·β1+Ky·β2+Kz·β3)·γ5+ +ϕ1,3·γ0+̟1,3·β4. Therefore: β0·/parenleftig/hatwiderH−Gt−Kt·γ5/parenrightig ·ψ= =β1·i·(∂x−iGx−iKx·γ5)·ψ+ +β2·i·(∂y−iGy−iKy·γ5)·ψ+ +β3·i·(∂z−iGz−iKz·γ5)·ψ+ +γ0·ϕ1,3·ψ+β4·̟1,3·ψ. LetRξandRκbe a functions for which: Rξψ=ϕ1,3ψ−i∂ξψ, Rκψ=̟1,3ψ−i∂κψ. In this case (similar to [3]): β0·/parenleftig/hatwiderH−Gt−Kt·γ5/parenrightig = =β1·i·(∂x−iGx−iKx·γ5)+ +β2·i·(∂y−iGy−iKy·γ5) + +β3·i·(∂z−iGz−iKz·γ5)+ +γ0·i·(∂ξ−iRξ) + +β4·i·(∂κ−iRκ).(2) The equation of motion (the Euler-Lagrange equation) is: 5β0·i∂tψ+β1·i∂xψ+β2·i∂yψ+β3·i∂zψ+ +β5·i∂ξψ+β4·i∂κψ+ +β0·Gt·ψ+β1·Gx·ψ+β2·Gy·ψ+β3·Gz·ψ+ +β5·Rξ·ψ+β4·Rκ·ψ+ +Kt·γ5·ψ+ +β1·Kx·γ5·ψ+β2·Ky·γ5·ψ+β3·Kz·γ5·ψ= = 0.(3) 3 The Global Rotations 3.1 The rotation of yOz,xOzandxOy Letαbe a constant real number and: y′=y·cos 2α+z·sin 2α, z′=z·cos 2α−y·sin 2α, t′=t, x′=y, ξ′=ξ, κ′=κ. In this case: j′ y′=jy·cos 2α+jz·sin 2α, j′ z′=jz·cos 2α−jy·sin 2α, ρ′=ρ, j′ x′=jx, j′ ξ′=jξ, j′ κ′=jκ.(4) Let: U2,3= cosα·14+ sinα·β2·β3 and ψ′=U2,3ψ. (5) Because: 6U† 2,3β2U2,3=β2·cos 2α+β3·sin 2α, U† 2,3β3U2,3=β3·cos 2α−β2·sin 2α, U† 2,3U2,3= 14, U† 2,3β1U2,3=β1, U† 2,3β4U2,3=β4, U† 2,3β5U2,3=β5, then from (1) and (4):   ψ′†·ψ′=ρ′, ψ′†·β1·ψ′=j′ x′, ψ′†·β2·ψ′=j′ y′, ψ′†·β3·ψ′=j′ z′/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle and the equation of motion is: β0·i∂t′ψ′+β1·i∂x′ψ′+β2·i∂y′ψ′+β3·i∂z′ψ′+ +β5·i∂ξ′ψ′+β4·i∂κ′ψ′+ +β0·G′ t′·ψ′+β1·G′ x′·ψ′+β2·G′ y′·ψ′+β3·G′ z′·ψ′+ +β5·R′ ξ′·ψ′+β4·R′ κ′·ψ′+ +K′ t′·γ5·ψ′+ +β1·K′ x′·γ5·ψ′+β2·K′ y′·γ5·ψ′+β3·K′ z′·γ5·ψ′= = 0.(6) Since: β2·U2,3=U2,3·(β2·cos 2α+β3·sin 2α), β3·U2,3=U2,3·(β3·cos 2α−β2·sin 2α), β1·U2,3=U2,3·β1, β4·U2,3=U2,3·β4, β5·U2,3=U2,3·β5 and ∂y′ψ=∂yψ·cos 2α+∂zψ·sin 2α, ∂z′ψ=−∂yψ·sin 2α+∂zψ·cos 2α 7then from (6) by (5) the following equation is derived: β0·i∂tψ+β1·i∂xψ+β2·i∂yψ+β3·i∂zψ+β5·i∂ξψ+β4·i∂κψ +β0·G′ t′·ψ+β1·G′ x′·ψ+ +β2·/parenleftig G′ y′·cos 2α−G′ z′·sin 2α/parenrightig ·ψ+ +β3·/parenleftig G′ z′·cos 2α+G′ y′·sin 2α/parenrightig ·ψ+ +K′ t′·γ5·ψ+β1·K′ x′·γ5·ψ+ +β2·/parenleftig K′ y′·cos 2α−K′ z′·sin 2α/parenrightig ·γ5·ψ+ +β3·/parenleftig K′ z′·cos 2α+K′ y′·sin 2α/parenrightig ·γ5·ψ+ +β5·R′ ξ′·ψ+β4·R′ κ′·ψ= 0. From it and from (3): Gy=G′ y′·cos 2α−G′ z′·sin 2α, Gz=G′ z′·cos 2α+G′ y′·sin 2α, Gt=G′ t′, Gx=G′ x′, Rξ=R′ ξ′, R′ κ′=Rκ and Ky=K′ y′·cos 2α−K′ z′·sin 2α, Kz=K′ z′·cos 2α+K′ y′·sin 2α, Kt=K′ t′, Kx=K′ x′. Like to above, the rotation of xOzandxOybehave with: U1,3= cosα·14+ sinα·β1·β3 and U1,2= cosα·14+ sinα·β1·β2 with accordance. Therefore the triplets {Gx,Gy,Gz}and{Kx,Ky,Kz}behave as a 3-vectors for the rotations of the Cartesian coordinates s ystem. 83.2 The rotation of tOx,tOyandtOz Letvbe a real constant number, for which: \|v\|<1. Letαbe a real number, for which: sinh (α) =v√ 1−v2. Let: t=t”·cosh 2α−x”·sinh 2α, x=x”·cosh 2α−t”·sinh 2α, y=y”, z=z”, ξ=ξ”, κ=κ”. In this case: ρ” =ρ·cosh 2α+jx·sinh 2α, jx”” =jx·cosh 2α+ρ·sinh 2α, jy”” =jy, jz”” =jz, jξ”” =jξ, jκ”” =jκ.(7) Let U0,1= coshα·β0+ sinhα·β0·β1 and ψ” =U0,1ψ. Because U† 0,1·β0·U0,1= cosh 2α·β0+ sinh 2α·β1 U† 0,1·β1·U0,1= cosh 2α·β1+ sinh 2α·β0 U† 0,1·β2·U0,1=β2 U† 0,1·β3·U0,1=β3 U† 0,1·β5·U0,1=β5 U† 0,1·β4·U0,1=β4(8) 9then from (1) and (7):   ψ”·ψ” =ρ”, ψ”·β1·ψ” =jx””, ψ”·β2·ψ” =jy””, ψ”·β3·ψ” =jz””/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle and the equation of motion is: β0·i∂t”(U0,1ψ) +β1·i∂x”(U0,1ψ)+ +β2·i∂y”(U0,1ψ) +β3·i∂z”(U0,1ψ)+ +β5·i∂ξ”(U0,1ψ) +β4·i∂κ”(U0,1ψ) + +β0·Gt””·(U0,1ψ) +β1·Gx””·(U0,1ψ) + +β2·Gy””·(U0,1ψ) +β3·Gz””·(U0,1ψ) + +β5·Rξ””·(U0,1ψ) +β4·Rκ””·(U0,1ψ) + +Kt””·γ5·(U0,1ψ) +β1·Kx””·γ5·(U0,1ψ) + +β2·Ky””·γ5·(U0,1ψ) +β3·Kz””·γ5·(U0,1ψ) = = 0; hence: U† 0,1·U0,1·i∂t”ψ+U† 0,1·β1·U0,1·i∂x”ψ+ +U† 0,1·β2·U0,1·i∂y”ψ+U† 0,1·β3·U0,1·i∂z”ψ+ +U† 0,1·β5·U0,1·i∂ξ”ψ+U† 0,1·β4·U0,1·i∂κ”ψ+ +U† 0,1·U0,1·Gt””·ψ+U† 0,1·β1·U0,1·Gx””·ψ+ +U† 0,1·β2·U0,1·Gy””·ψ+U† 0,1·β3·U0,1·Gz””·ψ+ +U† 0,1·β5·U0,1·Rξ””·ψ+U† 0,1·β4·U0,1·Rκ””·ψ+ +U† 0,1·Kt””·γ5·U0,1·ψ+ +U† 0,1·β1·Kx””·γ5·U0,1·ψ+ +U† 0,1·β2·Ky””·γ5·U0,1·ψ+ +U† 0,1·β3·Kz””·γ5·U0,1·ψ= = 0. Since γ5·U0,1=U0,1·γ5 and 10∂t”ψ= (∂tψ·cosh 2α−∂xψ·sinh 2α), ∂x”ψ= (∂xψ·cosh 2α−∂tψ·sinh 2α) then from (8) β0·i∂tψ+β1·i∂xψ+β2·i∂yψ+β3·i∂zψ+β5·i∂ξψ+β4·i∂κψ+ +β0·(cosh 2α·Gt”” + sinh 2α·Gx””)·ψ+ +β1·(cosh 2α·Gx”” + sinh 2α·Gt””)·ψ+ +β2·Gy””·ψ+β3·Gz””·ψ+β5·Rξ””·ψ+β4·Rκ””·ψ+ + (cosh 2α·Kt”” + sinh 2α·Kx””)·γ5·ψ+ +β1·(cosh 2α·Kx”” + sinh 2α·Kt””)·γ5·ψ+ +β2·Ky””·γ5·ψ+β3·Kz””·γ5·ψ= = 0. From it and from (3): Gt= cosh 2α·Gt”” + sinh 2α·Gx””, Gx= cosh 2α·Gx”” + sinh 2α·Gt””, Gy=Gy””, Gz=Gz””, Rξ=Rξ””, Rκ=Rκ”” and Kt= cosh 2α·Kt”” + sinh 2α·Kx””, Kx= cosh 2α·Kx”” + sinh 2α·Kt””, Ky=Ky””, Kz=Kz””. Like to above, the rotation of tOzandtOybehave with: U0,3= coshα·β0+ sinhα·β0·β3 and U0,2= coshα·β0+ sinhα·β0·β2 with accordance. 114 The Local Rotations of ξOκ Letθbe a real function of ( t,x,y,z,ξ,κ ) for which: ∂ξθ= 0 and∂κθ= 0 and: t‘ =t, x‘ =x, y‘ =y, z‘ =z, ξ‘ =ξ·cos 2θ+κ·sin 2θ, κ‘ =κ·cos 2θ−ξ·sin 2θ. (This transformation corresponds to the weak isospin trans formation [4]) In this case: ρ‘ =ρ, jx‘ =jx, jy‘ =jy, jz‘ =jz, jξ‘ =jξ·cos 2θ+jκ·sin 2θ, jκ‘ =jκ·cos 2θ−jξ·sin 2θ. Let: U5,4= cosθ·14+ sinθ·β5·β4 and ψ‘ = (U5,4ψ) . Because U† 5,4·U5,4= 14, U† 5,4·β1·U5,4=β1, U† 5,4·β2·U5,4=β2, U† 5,4·β3·U5,4=β3, U† 5,4·β5·U5,4=β5·cos 2θ+β4·sin 2θ, U† 5,4·β4·U5,4=β4·cos 2θ−β5·sin 2θ(9) then from above and from (1): 12ψ‘†·ψ‘ =ρ‘, ψ‘†·β1·ψ‘ =jx‘, ψ‘†·β2·ψ‘ =jy‘, ψ‘†·β3·ψ‘ =jz‘. and the equation of motion is: β0·i∂t‘(U5,4ψ) +β1·i∂x‘(U5,4ψ) +β2·i∂y‘(U5,4ψ) +β3·i∂z‘(U5,4ψ)+ +β5·i∂ξ‘(U5,4ψ) +β4·i∂κ‘(U5,4ψ)+ +β0·Gt‘‘·(U5,4ψ) + +β1·Gx‘‘·(U5,4ψ)+ +β2·Gy‘‘·(U5,4ψ) +β3·Gz‘‘·(U5,4ψ)+ +β5·Rξ‘‘·(U5,4ψ) +β4·Rκ‘‘·(U5,4ψ)+ +Kt‘‘·γ5·(U5,4ψ) +β1·Kx‘‘·γ5·(U5,4ψ)+ +β2·Ky‘‘·γ5·(U5,4ψ) +β3·Kz‘‘·γ5·(U5,4ψ) = = 0. Since γ5U5,4=U5,4γ5 and ∂µU5,4=−i∂µθ·γ5·U5,4 for all variables µthen U5,4·∂tθ·γ5·ψ+U5,4·β0·i∂tψ+β1U5,4·∂xθ·γ5·ψ+β1U5,4·i∂xψ+ +β2U5,4·∂yθ·γ5·ψ+β2U5,4·i∂yψ+β3U5,4·∂zθ·γ5·ψ+β3U5,4·i∂zψ+ +β5U5,4·i∂ξ‘ψ+β4U5,4·i∂κ‘ψ+ +Gt‘‘·U5,4ψ+β1U5,4·Gx‘‘·ψ+β2U5,4·Gy‘‘·ψ+β3U5,4·Gz‘‘·ψ+ +β5U5,4·Rξ‘‘·ψ+β4U5,4·Rκ‘‘·ψ+ +U5,4·Kt‘‘·γ5·ψ+ +β1U5,4·Kx‘‘·γ5·ψ+β2U5,4·Ky‘‘·γ5·ψ+β3U5,4·Kz‘‘·γ5·ψ= = 0. Since ∂ξ‘ψ=∂ξψ·cos 2θ+∂κψ·sin 2θ, ∂κ‘ψ=∂κψ·cos 2θ−∂ξψ·sin 2θ then from above and from (9): 13β0·i∂tψ+β1·i∂xψ+β2·i∂yψ+β3·i∂zψ+ +β5·i∂ξψ+β4·i∂κψ+ +β0·Gt‘‘·ψ+β1·Gx‘‘·ψ+β2·Gy‘‘·ψ+β3·Gz‘‘·ψ+ +β5·(cos 2θ·Rξ‘‘−sin 2θ·R4‘)·ψ+ +β4·(cos 2θ·Rκ‘‘ + sin 2θ·Rξ‘‘)·ψ+ + (Kt‘‘ +∂tθ)·γ5·ψ+β1·(Kx‘‘ +∂xθ)·γ5·ψ+ +β2·(Ky‘‘ +∂yθ)·γ5·ψ+β3·(Kz‘‘ +∂zθ)·γ5·ψ= = 0. From above and from (3): Kt‘‘ +∂tθ=Kt, Kx‘‘ +∂xθ=Kx, Ky‘‘ +∂yθ=Ky, Kz‘‘ +∂zθ=Kz, cos 2θ·Rξ‘‘−sin 2θ·Rκ‘‘ =Rξ, cos 2θ·Rκ‘‘ + sin 2θ·Rξ‘‘ =Rκ. 5 The Lagrangians If Kξ=Re(Rξ) andKκ=Re(Rκ) then the Lagrangian for the Hamiltonian (2) is the following : Lf= 0.5·i· · ψ†β0∂tψ+ψ†β1∂xψ+ψ†β2∂yψ+ψ†β3∂zψ+ψ†β5∂ξψ+ψ†β4∂κψ− −(∂tψ)†β0ψ−(∂xψ)†β1ψ−(∂yψ)†β2ψ−(∂zψ)†β3ψ− −(∂ξψ)†β5ψ−(∂κψ)†β4ψ + + ψ†β0Gtψ+ψ†β1Gxψ+ψ†β2Gyψ+ψ†β3Gzψ+ +ψ†Ktγ5ψ+ψ†β1Kxγ5ψ+ψ†β2Kyγ5ψ+ψ†β3Kzγ5ψ+ +ψ†β5Kξψ+ψ†β4Kκψ . 14If Hµ,ν=∂µKν−∂νKµ and H=  0Ht,xHt,yHt,zHt,κHt,ξ −Ht,x 0Hx,yHx,zHx,κHx,ξ −Ht,y−Hx,y 0Hy,zHy,κHy,ξ −Ht,z−Hx,z−Hy,z 0Hz,κHz,ξ −Ht,κ−Hx,κ−Hy,κ−Hz,κ 0Hκ,ξ −Ht,ξ−Hx,ξ−Hy,ξ−Hz,ξ−Hκ,ξ 0  then the Lagrangian for Kµ(0≤µ≤5): LK=H†·H. The Lagrange-Euler equation for Kµis: ∂t∂tKµ+∂x∂xKµ+∂y∂yKµ+∂z∂zKµ+∂ξ∂ξKµ+∂κ∂κKµ− −∂µ(∂tKt+∂xKx+∂yKy+∂zKz+∂ξKξ+∂κKκ) = 0. If ∂tKt+∂xKx+∂yKy+∂zKz+∂ξKξ+∂κKκ= 0 then ∂t∂tKµ+∂x∂xKµ+∂y∂yKµ+∂z∂zKµ=−(∂ξ∂ξKµ+∂κ∂κKµ). Ifm5andm4are a constant real numbers and for some functionWµ(t,x,y,z ): Kµ(t,x,y,z,ξ,κ ) =Wµ(t,x,y,z )·exp (i·(m5·ξ+m4·κ)) then the particle, deﬁned by the ﬁeld Kµ, has got the mass: m=/radicalig m2 5+m2 4. It is a massive gauge boson. 15References [1] G. Quznetsov, The Probability Distribution to Leptons a nd Quarks. http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/9904024 [2] for instance, E. Madelung, Die Mathematischen Hilfsmittel des Physikers . (Springer Verlag, 1957) [3] R. L. Ingraham, Particle masses and the ﬁfth dimension. http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0005118 [4] G. Quznetsov, Why the Parity Violation. http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/9906058 16
arXiv:physics/0006037v1 [physics.gen-ph] 16 Jun 2000Quantum mechanics can be led by metrics in Minkowski’s time-space world Takashi Sakai The Institute for Enzyme Research, The University of Tokush ima 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan Present temporary address: Amgen Institute/ Ontario Cance r Institute, 620 University Avenue, Suite 706, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C1, Ca nada Correspondence should be addressed to the author (e-mail: s akai@ier.tokushima- u.ac.jp, Tel.:+81-88-633-7430, Fax:+81-88-633-7431) Abstract A body of theory is completely diﬀerent between relativity t heory and quantum mechanics. Most targeting physical phenomena a re dif- 1ferent between them as well. Despite that both theories desc ribe our time-space world, no one has succeeded in arriving at one of t hese theories by using the other one, deductively. Fusion of thes e two the- ories produced quantum ﬁeld theory. However this theory imp resses us as a theory that was made by merging the two theories by forc e. So this theory cannot indicate the reason why both relativit y the- ory and quantum mechanics exist in this world at the same time . Here I show you that quantum mechanics can be led by the equati on of Minkowski’s metrics, which stands up in the relativistic world of space and time. This is the ﬁrst report proving mathematical ly that quantum mechanics can be born reductively in our relativist ic world. PACS numbers: 03.65.Bz, 03.75.-b, 11.90.+t Keywords: Quantum mechanics, Relativity theory, Minkowsk i’s time- space world The strong success of quantum mechanics is not surprising co nsidering its much greater degree of eﬃcacy, on an atomic scale, compared t o any other theory. However, it has also been diﬃcult to understand the f undamental 2implication of quantum mechanics because of its speciﬁcity from the struc- ture of the theory including wave-particle duality[1]. We a re able to see such speciﬁcity from the aspect that the theory has borne lot s of paradoxical questions. On the other hand, the theory includes another im portant as- pect: that it seems to be incompatible with aspects of relati vity theory that exert great validity against our macroscopic scale. Here I w ould like to pro- pose some novel techniques and ideas in order to understand t he relationship between these two theories and to solve the paradoxical ques tions of quan- tum mechanics, such as wave-particle duality or the measure ment problem. Here it is shown that quantum mechanics can be led from the equ ation in Minkowski’s space-time world. The diﬀerential distance dsin Minkowski’s space-time world (Minkowski’s metrics) is given by (ds)2=−(cdt)2+ (dx)2+ (dy)2+ (dz)2(1) For our simpliﬁed spacetime, with just one space dimension, this reduces to (ds)2=−(cdt)2+ (dx)2(2) 3This can also be rewritten by (ds)2=−(cdt)2(cos2θt−(isinθt)2) + (dx)2(cos2θx−(isinθx)2) =−(cdtcosθt,icdtsinθt)(cdtcosθt,−icdtsinθt) + (dxcosθx,idxsinθx)(dxcosθx,−idxsinθx) =−dψt·dψ∗ t+dψx·dψ∗ x (3) i=√ −1 dψ(θ) =dx(cosθ,isinθ) dψ∗(θ) =dx(cosθ,−isinθ) =dψ(−θ) Thesedψanddψ∗are expressed as the coordinates on a circumference in a complex space of real and imaginary axis (Figure 1). I will d iscuss later concerning this complex space. First of all, you consider a c omplex world consisting with an imaginary space lying at right angles to a real space for either its time dimension or its space dimension. Then you th ink about a circle consisting of a minute segment ( dx) as a radius (Figure 1). The “dψ(θ) =dx(cosθ,isinθ) ” or the “ dψ∗(θ) =dx(cosθ,−isinθ) ” shown above represents points on the circumference. If this condi tionψis involved in a quantum behavior, θmust be a function of the coordinates of the real space,x. When you consider the existence of a particle in this minute region 4∆x, the condition must have a feature of a wave in the imaginary s pace. If you use λfor its wavelength, you can substitute2π λxforθ. So if you write the particle’s condition as the function of xlikeψ(x), the condition in the minute region dψ(x) is written as dψ(x) =dx(isin2π λx,cos2π λx). This can be rewritten asdψ dx= (isin2π λx,cos2π λx). And this leads to ψ=−iλ 2π(isin2π λx,cos2π λx) =−iλ 2πdψ dx. Assuming that the λis equiv- alent to the de Broglie wavelength,[2] the relationship bet ween theλand the momentum of the particle ( P) can be described asλ 2π=¯h P. If you substitute this, you get the equation shown below. Pψ=−i¯h∂ψ ∂x(4) Next, you think about time dimension as well. You combine the equation dψ(t) =dt(isinθ,cosθ) andθ=−2πνt. Then you getdψ dt=c(isin(−2πνt),cos(−2πνt)). One of the simplest solu- tions of the equation is ψ(t) =ic 2πν(isin(−2πνt),cos(−2πνt)) =i1 2πνdψ dt. By substituting ν=E hinto this equation, you get Eψ(t) =i¯hdψ dt(5) Equivalent results can be obtained concerning ψ∗(x) andψ∗(t) as well. So, 5all the results can be put together with the simple equations shown below. (ds)2=gijdxidxj=gijdψidψ∗ j (6) (gij: metric tensor) ψ∗(x) =ψ(−x) =−¯h P(icosP ¯hx,sinP ¯hx) (7) Here I succeeded in demonstrating that quantum mechanics ca n be led by Minkowski’s space-time world by assuming the existence of a n imaginary space lying at right angles to a real space for either its time dimension or its space dimension. You can also see from the equation of ψorψ∗that the quantum mechanical area size of a particle is restricted in¯h P, in which the particle exists as two waves written by complex numbers ( ψandψ∗). This means that any matter produces a quantum ﬁeld by its mome ntum, and that the size of the ﬁeld is restricted by the momentum. In addition, both of the quantum mechanical functions led by two wave func tionsψand ψ∗are equivalent, so these quantum mechanical features are un deniably with each other. The conclusion is that any particle moves as two q uantum me- chanical waves of ψandψ∗in its speciﬁc small areas. On the other hand, if you write the condition of a particle without the idea of an im aginary space, 6you cannot see such quantum mechanical features. Here you ge t a solution against the measurement problem of quantum theories. The me asurement itself is equivalent to denying the existence of an imaginar y space because we cannot measure any movement in imaginary spaces. So if you de scribe the movement according to the measurement, you never reach the f unctions of ψandψ∗. So you can only measure the space by ( dx)2=gijdxidxj, which is an incomplete equation of the equation (6). Next, I discuss the meaning of the complex world of real and im aginary axes. The imaginary axis lying at right angles to a real axis (Figur e 1) can be interpreted as an axis of the ﬁfth dimension, which is diﬀere nt from our four- dimensional world. However, more simple and easy alternati ve idea may be to interpret it as a time axis. On the contrary, an imaginary a xis against time axis can be interpreted as an axis of the ﬁfth or sixth dimensi ons. However, the more simple and easy way is to interpret it as a space axis. For instance, you put a space axis and an imaginary axis lying at right angle s to the space axis asxandiy, respectively ( i=√−1), metric tensor ( ds)2is given by (ds)2= (dx)2+ (idy)2= (dx)2−(dy)2(8) This indicates that the iyaxis is in a time dimension. In addition, the 7equation (3) indicates that both the space and time axes can b e treated as the complex of real and imaginary axes in a minute region. A nd this operation can lead quantum mechanics as I showed. These fact s lead us to imagine that the essence of quantum mechanics lies in the tra nsformation between space and time regions in the world of space and time. References [1] R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton and M. L. Sands The Feynman le ctures on physics (Addison-Wesky Publishing Company) 1, 37 (1965) . [2] de Broglie, L. Recherches d’Un Demi-Siecle (Paris: Albi n Michel) (1976). 8Figure 1: Particles exist in complex world I hypothesize that an imaginary world exists against our rea l world of time and space. The equation (3) indicates that the axes of the ima ginary world lie at right angles to the axes of the real world. You consider a particle, which is moving with momentum Pat a moment. This particle is supposed to have an uncertain region (∆ x). And this uncertain region can be composed of two diﬀerent conditions (∆ ψand ∆ψ∗) according to the equation (3). 9
arXiv:physics/0006038v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 16 Jun 2000Mathematical investigation of the Boltzmann collisional operator C. Y. Chen Dept. of Physics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, PRC Email: cychen@public2.east.net.cn Abstract : With help of direct calculation, it is revealed that an esse ntial concept in deriving the Boltzmann collisional operator, th e scattering cross section in the laboratory frame, cannot be well deﬁned. Alon g this line, it is suggested that the collisional operator, as well as the en tire Boltzmann equation, should be reconsidered. PACS number: 51.10.+y. 1The Boltzmann equation is the ﬁrst kinetic equation arising from the attempt of physicists to describe the dynamical behavior of gases in terms of microscopic basic rules. The equation has entered into ph ysics textbooks and served as a model for other kinetic equations[1][2]. Historically speaking, the Boltzmann equation was strongl y criticized by Boltzmann’s contemporaries and successors. As a subject of long and hot debate it involved a great number of scientists and philo sophers. The main reason for having such debate was simply related to the f act that Boltzmann explicitly employed the time reversibility of Ne wton’s law to derive his equation while his equation itself appeared to be time-irreversible. Even today, when the equation is considered as a “basic” equa tion of classical physics, many physicists do feel uncomfortable about the pa radox involved (though there are no many discussions in the main literature due to a lack of new developments). In setting up a new kinetic approach[3], called the path-int egral ap- proach, one employed, as the ﬁrst choice, the Boltzmann meth od to treat collisions; to one’s surprise, it was found that the Boltzma nn method in- volved conceptual and computational diﬃculties. In this pa per, we report on what emerged from our research. In order to avoid controve rsy, we will make our discussion as mathematical as possible. Let’s recall key points in the derivation of the Boltzmann co llisional operator. Firstly, consider that two molecules with the sam e mass collide with each other. If we denote their velocities before the col lision by v1and v2, the center-of-mass velocity and relative velocity of them are respectively c= (v1+v2)/2,u=v1−v2. (1) Similarly, after the collision we have c′= (v′ 1+v′ 2)/2,u′=v′ 1−v′ 2. (2) The conservation laws in classical mechanics imply c′=c\|u′\|=\|u\|=u. (3) The direction of u′is also calculable in classical mechanics if more informa- tion, such as the impact parameter of the collision, is given [4]. According to textbooks of statistical mechanics[1], the scattering c ross section ¯ σin the laboratory frame is deﬁned in such a way that ¯σ(v1,v2→v′ 1,v′ 2)dv′ 1dv′ 2 (4) 2represents the number of molecules per unit time (per unit ﬂu x of type 1 molecules incident upon a type 2 molecule) emerging after sc attering with respective ﬁnal velocities between v′ 1andv′ 1+dv′ 1and between v′ 2and v′ 2+dv′ 2. Similarly, the scattering cross section in the center-of- mass frame is deﬁned so that σ(Ω)dΩ (5) represents the number of type 1 molecules per unit time emerg ing after scattering within the range dΩ where Ω is the solid angle between uandu′. The two cross sections are related to each other by /integraldisplay σ(Ω)dΩ =/integraldisplay v′ 1/integraldisplay v′ 2¯σ(v1,v2→v′ 1,v′ 2)dv′ 1dv′ 2. (6) Now, consider collisions between molecules in a Boltzmann g as. For a given volume drdv1in the position-velocity phase space ( µ-space), the decrease of molecules within the time interval dtis /integraldisplay v2,v′ 1,v′ 2dt[uf(v2)dv2][f(v1)drdv1¯σ(v1,v2→v′ 1,v′ 2)dv′ 1dv′ 2],(7) where the ﬁrst square bracket is the relative ﬂux of type 2 mol ecules, the second square bracket represents the total cross section of type 1 molecules. The increase of molecules is similarly expressed by /integraldisplay v2,v′ 1,v′ 2dt[uf(v′ 2)dv′ 2][f(v′ 1)drdv′ 1¯σ(v′ 1,v′ 2→v1,v2)]dv1dv2.(8) By adopting the reversibility of the collisions ¯σ(v1,v2→v′ 1,v′ 2) = ¯σ(v′ 1,v′ 2→v1,v2) (9) and making use of (6), the net increase of molecules in the giv en volume drdv1within the time interval dtbecomes dtdrdv1/integraldisplay v2,Ω[f(v′ 1)f(v′ 2)−f(v1)f(v2)]uσ(Ω)dΩdv2. (10) In the standard collisionless theory, the net increase per u nit time and per unit phase volume is recognized as d f dt=∂f ∂t+v1·∂f ∂r+F m·∂f ∂v1= 0. (11) 3By assuming (10) to be a correction term to (11), the Boltzman n equation is obtained as ∂f ∂t+v1·∂f ∂r+F m·∂f ∂v1=/integraldisplay v2,Ω[f(v′ 1)f(v′ 2)−f(v1)f(v2)]uσ(Ω)dΩdv2.(12) Though the derivation outlined above seems quite stringent , there exist several hidden loopholes that actually ruin its foundation . The immediate concern is with the validity of the deﬁnition o f scattering cross section in the laboratory frame, namely ¯ σin (4). Fig. 1 sketches a situation in that a number of molecules with the velocity v1collide with a molecule with the velocity v2. The spread of the scattered molecules is due to the fact that colliding molecules involve diﬀerent impact p arameters. There are two issues worth special attention. One is that there exi sts an overspec- iﬁcation in the deﬁnition (4): after dv′ 1is speciﬁed, specifying dv′ 2is in fact unnecessary and also misleading, in view of equations (1)-( 3). The other is that the scattered molecules do not spread out over a three -dimensional velocity volume (as the deﬁnition suggests), instead they s pread out over a two-dimensional surface in the velocity space. Fig. 2 illu strates that the two-dimensional surface, referred to as the accessible sur face hereafter, is a spherical shell with diameter u. The second issue indicated above presents serious diﬃculty in the following sense. If the velocity vol ume element dv′ 1 in (4) is chosen to be one like a tall-and-slim cylindrical bo x, as shown in Fig. 3a, the value of ¯ σtends to zero. Whereas, if the volume element is like a short-and-fat cylindrical box, see Fig. 3b, the value of ¯ σtends to inﬁnity. For purposes of this paper, we evaluate the deﬁned scatterin g cross section on the assumption that the volume element dv′ 1is a spherical ball shown in Fig. 3c (rather common in one’s mental picture). It is easy to see that the value of ¯ σcan, in the situation, be expressed by ¯σ=¯σdv′ 1(dv′ 2) dv′ 1(dv′ 2)=ρπa2 4πa3/3=3ρ 4a, (13) where ρis the molecular density on the accessible surface (per unit ﬂux of type 1 molecules) and ais the radius of the spherical ball dv′ 1. Equation (13) indicates that the value of the cross section approache s inﬁnity if ρis ﬁnite and a→0. Since the scattering cross section ¯ σin the laboratory frame, as revealed above, depends on the shape and size of chosen volume element in the mea- surement, and since it takes a value equal to either zero or in ﬁnity, it cannot be considered as a well-deﬁned quantity. 4A question may now come to one’s mind. Is it possible that the B oltz- mann collisional operator can be derived without recourse t o the cross sec- tion discussed above? To give an answer to this question, we w ill, following the spirit of the standard approach, make a direct calculati on concerning the net change rate of molecules in a phase volume element drdv1. Since all the collisions take place in terms of classical mechanics su ch calculation can be done analytically (as well as numerically). Firstly, the decrease of molecules in the phase volume eleme nt is of con- cern. There are three essential steps that we need to take. At the ﬁrst step, molecules expressed by f(v1)dv1andf(v2)dv2are identiﬁed as two colliding beams in the laboratory frame. At the second step, the collision rate between the two beams is formulated in terms of the cross section σ(Ω), which makes good sense in in the center-of-mass frame. (This type of cross section is well deﬁned and extensively discussed in textboo ks of mechanics.) Without any diﬃculty, the number of collisions related to th e two molecular beams is formulated as /integraldisplay Ωdt[uf(v2)dv2][drdv1f(v1)σ(Ω)dΩ]. (14) At the third step, integrating expression (14) over the velo cityv2yields the number of interest dtdrdv1/integraldisplay v2,Ωf(v1)f(v2)uσ(Ω)dΩdv2. (15) Comparing it with the second term of (10) tells us that we have not obtained anything new. Then, we take the same manner to calculate the increase of mol ecules in the given phase volume element. It is to be noted that we need t o take four, instead of three, steps to do the job. At the ﬁrst step, molecu les expressed byf(v′ 1)dv′ 1andf(v′ 2)dv′ 2are similarly identiﬁed as two colliding beams in the laboratory frame. At the second step, the collisions are also investigated in the center-of-mass frame and the number of collisions rel ated to the two beams is similarly formulated as /integraldisplay Ωdt[uf(v′ 2)dv′ 2][drdv′ 1f(v′ 1)σ(Ω)dΩ]. (16) At the third step, we try to determine what fraction of the sca ttered molecules enter the given phase volume element drdv1. The task, if deﬁned as that in the standard approach, can be accomplished in the followi ng way. Since 5the scattered molecules spread out over a spherical shell Swith diameter u=\|v′ 1−v′ 2\|, we may introduce a probability density as P(Ω)≡lim ∆S→01 n∆n ∆Swith/integraldisplay P(Ω)dΩ = 1 (17) where nis the total number of type 1 scattered molecules and Ω is the s olid angle of the velocity uwith respect to u′. If needed, Pdeﬁned as above can be calculated in terms of classical mechanics; for the purpo se here it suﬃces to ﬁnd its value to be ﬁnite. By assuming that dv1is a small spherical ball with radius a, the number of molecules entering the volume element due to the collisions of the two beams is, by following (16), /integraldisplay ΩP(Ω)(πa2)dtdrf(v′ 1)f(v′ 2)uσ(Ω)dΩdv′ 1dv′ 2. (18) At the fourth step, the expression above is integrated over t he two, instead of one, velocities v′ 1andv′ 2and the increase of molecules within the phase volume drdv1during dtis 1 2dtdr(πa2)/integraldisplay v′ 1,v′ 2,ΩP(Ω)f(v′ 1)f(v′ 2)uσ(Ω)dΩdv′ 1dv′ 2. (19) The factor 1 /2 in the last expression is due to the fact that each of molecules has been taken into account twice. By virtue of dv1= 4πa3/3, the increase of molecules per unit time and per unit phase vol ume becomes 3 8a/integraldisplay v′ 1,v′ 2,ΩP(Ω)f(v′ 1)f(v′ 2)uσ(Ω)dΩdv′ 1dv′ 2. (20) Note that the integration in (20) can regularly be performed , but the value of (20) itself is not well deﬁned. As a→0, it tends to inﬁnity. Apart from assuming ato be relatively small, the formulation above, from (16) to (20), introduces no approximation, and the enco untered diﬃ- culty cannot be removed by any kinds of technical treatments . We may then wonder why the diﬃculty, seeming quite obvious, d id not emerge long ago. The reason probably lies in the fact that the collisional eﬀect has to be formulated in the six-dimensional phase spac e and this space is in many situations too abstract to visualize and comprehe nd. As the mental grip loosens, “planes”, “vectors”, “ﬂuxes” and “col lisions”, which are once clear and helpful concepts in the usual spaces, beco me obscure and 6even misleading. From this point of view, we can ﬁnd that more treatments in textbooks are questionable. In deriving the standard Boltzmann equation, the collision al operator is considered as a correction term to the collisionless Boltzm ann equation. In this context, we are supposed to focus on a “speciﬁc” phase vo lume element and investigate how the molecular number within it varies in the absence and presence of collisions. There are two kinds of phase volu me elements employed by textbooks, neither of them is free from troubles ome issues. The ﬁrst kind of phase volume element is that associated with a moving molecule in µ-space. It is rather well-known that, in the absence of colli sions the distribution function keeps invariant along the molecu le’s path f(t0,r0,v0) =f(t,r,v). (21) That is to say, if we have a six-dimensional deﬁnite-size sma ll box and let it move with a molecule, the number of molecules in this box will not change with respect to time, as shown in Fig. 4. If this picture were a dopted consistently, we should, in constructing the collisional o perator, formulate the molecular number in this moving box. Let alone whether it can be accomplished or not, the task outlined above has never been t ried. The second kind of phase volume element is that located at a st ation- ary point in µ-space. In order to formulate the net change of molecules in such a six-dimensional box, it is of necessity to deﬁne ﬂuxes through the “walls”. Noting that the walls under consideration are ﬁve- dimensional hy- persurfaces, we must sense the involved diﬃculty. For insta nce, the textbook treatment employs ˙ x=vxto deﬁne the ﬂux along the x-direction; but Fig. 5 illustrates that in the six-dimensional phase space this “ velocity” is per- pendicular to the two-dimensional surface ∆ y∆znot to the ﬁve-dimensional hypersurface ∆vx∆vy∆vz∆y∆z, (22) sincevxis among the ﬁve dimensions of the hypersurface. As a matter o f fact, we do not know anything that can be deﬁned as a ﬂux throug h the hypersurface. The standard approach takes a convenient way to do its job. In deﬁning and dealing with ﬂuxes, only three-dimensional subspaces o f the phase space, the spatial space or the velocity space, exists in the mental picture. In formulating collisional eﬀects, only the velocity change p er unit time due to collisions is in one’s mind but the position change per uni t time due to 7collisions is not. In view of these facts, the entire Boltzma nn equation should be reconsidered. A complete discussion on the arising questions and problems is much beyond the scope of this brief paper. In some of our recent pap ers[5][6], we make more analyses and try to introduce alternative appro aches to the Boltzmann gas. The work is partly supported by the fund provided by Educatio n Min- istry, PRC. References [1] See, for instance, F. Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics , (McGraw-Hill book Company, 1965). [2] E.G. Harris, Introduction to Modern Theoretical Physics , (John Wiley and Sons, 1975). [3] C.Y. Chen, Perturbation Methods and Statistical Theories , in English, (International Academic Publishers, Beijing, 1999). [4] L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Mechanics , (Pergamon Press, 1976). [5] C.Y. Chen, A path-integral approach to the collisionless Boltzmann ga s, to be published. [6] C.Y. Chen, A path-integral approach to the collisional Boltzmann gas , to be published. 8Figure captions Fig. 1, Collisions between a beam of type 1 molecules and a typ e 2 molecule. The spread of scattered molecules is due to the fact that type 1 molecules have diﬀerent impact parameters with respect to the type 2 mo lecule. Fig. 2, Schematic of the accessible surface over which the ve locities of type 1 molecules spread out. Fig. 3, Chosen shapes of the velocity volume element of scatt ered molecules. Fig. 4, A moving six-dimensional phase volume element. Fig. 5, Diﬃculty in deﬁning a ﬂux through a ﬁve-dimensional h ypersurface. 9Figure 1 v1 v2v′ 1 v′ 2❅ ❅ ❅❅ ❅ ❅❅ ❅ ❅❘❘❘
arXiv:physics/0006039v1 [physics.class-ph] 16 Jun 2000Twin Paradox and Space Topology Jean–Philippe Uzan1,2, Jean–Pierre Luminet3, Roland Lehoucq4and Patrick Peter3,5 (1) Laboratoire de Physique Th´ eorique, CNRS–UMR 8627, Bˆ a t. 210, Universit´ e Paris XI, F-91405 Orsay cedex (France) (2) D´ epartement de Physique Th´ eorique, Universit´ e de Ge n` eve, 24 quai E. Ansermet, CH-1211 Gen` eve 4 (Switzerland) (3) D´ epartement d’Astrophysique Relativiste et de Cosmol ogie, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS–UMR 8629, F–92195 Meudon cedex (France) (4) CE–Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/Service d’Astrophysique, F–91 191 Gif sur Yvette cedex (France). (4) Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, 98 bis, boulevard Ar ago, 75005 Paris (France) (February 2, 2008) If space is compact, then a traveller twin can leave Earth, tr avel back home without changing direction and ﬁnd her sedentary twin older than herself. We s how that the asymmetry between their spacetime trajectories lies in a topological invaria nt of their spatial geodesics, namely the homotopy class. This illustrates how the spacetime symmetr y invariance group, although valid locally , is broken down globally as soon as some points of space are identiﬁed. As a consequenc e, any non–trivial space topology deﬁnes preferred inertial fram es along which the proper time is longer than along any other one. Preprint numbers: LPT–ORSAY 00/45, UGVA–DPT 00/04–1080 I. INTRODUCTION The twin paradox is the best known thought experi- ment of special relativity, whose resolution provides inte r- esting insights on the structure of spacetime and on the applicability of the Lorentz transformations. In its sem- inal paper on special relativity, Einstein [1] pointed out the problem of clocks synchronization between two iner- tial frames with relative velocity v. Later on, Langevin [2] picturesquely formulated the problem by taking the example of twins aging diﬀerently according to their re- spective worldlines. The keypoint for understanding the paradox is the asymmetry between the spacetime trajec- tories of the “sedentary twin” and of the “traveller twin”. The subject has been widely studied for pedagogical pur- pose [3,4], the role of acceleration was examined in details [5–8] and a full general relativistic treatment was given [9]. Although counter-intuitive, the twin paradox is clearly not a logical contradiction, it merely illustrates the elas - ticity of time in relativistic mechanics. The experiment was actually performed in 1971 with twin atomic clocks initially synchronized, one of them being kept at rest on Earth and the other one being embarked on a commer- cial ﬂight: the time shifts perfectly agreed with the fully relativistic calculations [10] An interesting “revisited” paradox was formulated [11,12] in the framework of a closed space (due to cur- vature or to topology). In such a case, the twins can meet again without none of them being accelerated, yet they aged diﬀerently. Both an algebraic and a geometric solution were given [13]. Our present goal is to extend such explanations by adding a topological characterization of reference frames , which allows us to solve the twin paradox whatever the global shape of space may be. We ﬁrst brieﬂy recall, in §II, the classical twin paradox and its standard resolu-tion, in §III we investigate the case of a spacetime with compact spatial sections and in §IV, we show that the root explanation of the twin paradox lies in the global breakdown of the spacetime symmetry group by a non– trivial topology. II. THE STANDARD TWIN PARADOX Let observers 1 and 2 be attached to inertial frames with relative velocity v. 1 is supposed to be at rest and to experience no acceleration. At time t= 0, the observers synchronise their clock (thus they can be called “twins”). Then twin 2 travels away at velocity + vwith respect to 1 and comes back with velocity −v. According to special relativity, the travel time, ∆ τ2, measured by 2 (its proper time) is related to the proper time measured by 1, ∆ τ1, by ∆τ2=/radicalbig 1−v2∆τ1. (1) A paradox arises if one considers that the situation is per- fectly symmetrical about 1 and 2, since 2 sees 1 travelling away with velocity −vand coming back with velocity + v. If this was correct, one could reverse the reasoning to de- duce that 1 should be younger than 2, with ∆τ1=/radicalbig 1−v2∆τ2, (2) and an obvious contradiction would arise. Indeed, the previous argument holds whenever 2 is not accelerating. As ﬁrst explained by Paul Langevin [2], among all the worldlines that connect two spacetime events (such as the departure and return of 2), the one which has the longest proper time is the unaccelerated one, i.e. the reference frame Kof 1. The traveller twin 2 cannot avoid accelerating and decelerating to make its re- turn journey; then he had to jump from an inertial frame 1K′moving relatively to Kwith velocity vtoanother in- ertial frame K′′moving with velocity −vwith respect toK. Hence the situation is not symmetrical about the twins: a kink (inﬁnite acceleration) in the middle of the path of twin 2 explains the diﬀerence, and there is no contradiction in the fact that the sedentary twin 1 will deﬁnitely be older than the traveller twin 2. The same result holds in the framework of general rel- ativity, dealing with a more realistic situation including accelerations, gravitational ﬁelds and curved spacetime (so that the kink is smoothed out): in order to achieve its journey, the traveller 2 necessarily experiences a ﬁnit e and variable acceleration; thus her reference frame is not equivalent to that of 1. Such explanations, as rephrased by Bondi [14], are equivalent to say that there is only one way of getting from the ﬁrst meeting point to the second without accel- eration . However, acceleration is not the only and essential point of the twin paradox, as shown by the example of non–accelerated twins in a closed space, in which there are several ways to go from the ﬁrst meeting point to the second one without accelerating [11–13]. The key explanation of the twin paradox is now “some kind” of asymmetry between the spacetime paths joining two events. We investigate below the nature of such an asym- metry when space topology is nottrivial (i.e. simply– connected) III. TWINS IN A COMPACT SPACE In a spacetime which has at least one compact space dimension, one can actually start from one point, travel along several straight geodesics and come back to the same spatial position without accelerating nor deceler- ating. Einstein’s relativity theory determines the local properties of the spacetime M(its metrics), but gives little information about its global properties (its topol- ogy) [15,16], so that special relativity (in the absence of gravitational ﬁelds) or general relativity (involving gra v- itational ﬁelds in curved spacetimes) well describe the local physics. For instance, the Minkowski spacetime (M, η) used in special relativity is a manifold R4with a ﬂat Lorentzian metric η= diag(-1,1,1,1) and Euclidean space sections Σ. One can obain spacetimes locally iden- tical to ( M, η) but with diﬀerent large scale properties by identifying points in Munder a group of transfor- mations, called holonomies , which preserve the metric (thus holonomies are isometries). For instance, identify- ing (x0, x1, x2, x4) with ( x0+L, x1, x2, x3) changes the topology from R4to a cylinder S1×R3and introduces closed timelike lines. However, if causality is believed to hold in the sense that no eﬀect can preceed its cause, such an identiﬁcation is prohibited, and the study of space- time topology is restricted so as to exclude closed time- like curves [15]. This is achieved if spacetime can bedecomposed as the direct product M=R×Σ (3) where the real axis Rrefers to the time direction and Σ to the three dimensional spatial sections. Now the topology of spacetime amounts to the study of the various shapes of the spatial sections Σ. The topology of a three–dimensional Riemannian space Σ can be described in full generality by a funda- mental polyhedron Pand a holonomy group Γ whose elements gidentify the faces of the polyhedron by pairs (see e.g. [16] for a general discussion of the topological properties of spacetimes). It follows that Σ can be writ- ten as Σ =X/Γ (4) where Xis the universal covering space [16] (simply– connected and three dimensional) and the quotient refers to the equivalence relation ‘ ≡’ deﬁned as ∀x,y∈Xx≡y⇐⇒(∃g∈Γ\|x=gy).(5) If Γ reduces to the identity, space is simply–connected, in the sense that two points of space are connected by only one geodesic. As soon as there are non– trivial holonomies which identify points, space is multi– connected and several geodesics connect two any distinct points. In a cosmological context, multi–connected uni- verse models lead to the existence of ghost images in the observable universe when one topological length is shorter than the horizon size. Many methods aimed to detect the cosmic topology have been proposed [16,17], so far with no deﬁnite answer coming from observational data. Returning to Minkowski space for the sake of clarity, the holonomies of Γ that preserve the ﬂatness of the space sections Σ are the identity, the translations, the reﬂex- ions and the helicoidal displacements. The group clas- siﬁcation leads to 18 Euclidean spaceforms with diﬀer- ent topologies, all of them having as universal covering space Xthe simply–connected, inﬁnite Euclidean space R3. Six of them are compact (i.e. of ﬁnite volume) and orientable. Their fundamental polyhedron can be a par- allelepiped or a hexagonal prism. For the sake of visual- ization, in the following we shall develop our reasoning in ﬂat spacetimes with 1+2 dimensions only, i.e. whose spa- tial sections Σ are just surfaces. In such a case there are 5 Euclidean topologies: the cylinder, the M¨ obius strip, the ﬂat torus, the Klein bottle and the Euclidean plane [16]. For a pedagogical purpose, we select the case where space has a torus–like topology (see ﬁgure 1). However we emphasize that our conclusions will remain valid in (1+3) dimensions, whatever the topology and the (con- stant) space curvature may be. 2NameFD and identifi- cationsShape Closed Orientable a b b b b b b bba aa a a a ac d dcYESYESNONO YES NO YES NOcylinder Möbius strip torus Klein bottlecd cd FIG. 1. The four multi–connected topologies of the two di- mensional Euclidean plane. They are constructed from a par- allelogram or an inﬁnite band (fundamental domain FD), by identiﬁcation of edges according to the allowable holonomi es. We indicate as well their compactness and orientability pro p- erties (from [14]). Since a characteristics of multi–connected spaces is to provide several geodesics between two any points, we shall extend the concept of “twins” to more than two and consider an ensemble of “twins” (strictly speaking, initially synchronized clocks) labeled as 1,2,3 and 4 (see ﬁgure 2 [left]). The twin 1 stays at home at point Oand her worldline can be identiﬁed with the time axis. The twin 2 leaves Oatt= 0, travels away and then turns back to meet twin 1 in P. The twins 3 and 4 leave Oin two diﬀerent directions along non–accelerated worldlines and travel away from 1; they respectively reach P′andP′′, where they meet twin 1∗. Due to warped space, twins 3 and 4 managed to come back without changing their direction and inertial frame. Now, one wants to compare the ages within the various pairs of twins when they meet again. Whereas twin 2 undergone the standard paradox, there seems to be a real paradox with twins 1, 3 and 4, who all followed strictly inertial frames. In [13] it was shown that, in the case of a cylinder, the sedentary twin 1 is always older than any traveller be- cause their states of motions, although non–accelerated, are not symmetrical. Which kind of asymmetry is to be considered? As we emphasize below, acceleration is a local concept, and the only explanation lies in a global breakdown of symmetry due to a non–trivial topology. Let us consider the projection of the worldlines onto a constant time hypersurface Σ, assumed to be a 2D ﬂat torus (see ﬁgure 2 [right]). Each projection is a loop γ(u,x0) atx0which can be parametrised by u∈[0,1[ ∗Under very special circumstances, twins 3 and 4 could also meet altogether with twins 1 and 2 at the same point of spacetime!ifγ(0) = γ(1) = x0, where x0is a point of Σ. Two loops at x0,γandδ, are said to be homotopic ( γ∼δ) if they can be continuously deformed into one another, i.e. if there exists a continuous map (called homotopy) F: [0,1[×[0,1[→Xsuch that ∀u∈[0,1[, F(s,0) =γ(u), F(u,1) =δ(u) ∀v∈[0,1[, F(0, v) =F(1, v) =x0. The equivalence class of homotopic loops is denoted by [γ]. We denote γithe loop corresponding to the projec- tion of the trajectory of twin iin Σ. In our example (see ﬁgure 2), the twins 1 and 2 have homotopic trajectories: since 2 does not “go around” the universe, the loop γ2can be continuously contracted into the null loop γ1={0}, so γ1∼γ2∼ {0}. However, among these two homotopic loops, only one cor- responds to an inertial observer going from OtoP: that of twin 1, which is thus older than twin 2, as expected in the standard paradox. Now, the twins 3 and 4 respectively go once around the hole and around the handle of the torus. From a topo- logical point of view, their paths can be characterized by a so–called winding index. In a cylinder, the winding in- dex is just an integer which counts the number of times a loop rolls around the surface. In the case of a 2–torus, the winding index is a couple ( m, n) of integers where mand nrespectively count the numbers of times the loop goes around the hole and the handle. In our example, twins 1 and 2 have the same winding index (0,0), whereas twins 3 and 4 have winding indexes respectively equal to (1 ,0) and (0 ,1). The winding index is a topological invariant for each traveller: neither change of coordinates or ref- erence frame (which ought to be continuous) can change its value. To summarize, we have the two situations: 1. Two twins have the same winding index (twins 1 and 2 in our example), because their loops belong to the same homotopy class. Nevertheless only one (twin 1) can go from the ﬁrst meeting point to the second one without changing inertial frame. The situation is not symmetrical about 1 and 2 due to local acceleration, and 1 is older than 2. 2. Several twins (1, 3 and 4 in our example) can go from the ﬁrst meeting point to a second one at a constant speed, but travel along paths with dif- ferent winding indexes. Their situations are not symmetrical because their loops belong to diﬀerent homotopy classes: γ1/ne}ationslash∼γ3/ne}ationslash∼γ4. Twin 1 is older than twins 3 and 4 because her path has a zero winding index. 3O1 23 4O'O" P'P" Pt space spatial sectiontime FIG. 2. Diﬀerent twins in a (1+2) spacetime with toroidal spatial sections. All of them leave 0 at the same time. While 1 remains at home, 2 [dash-dotted line] goes away and then comes back to meet 1 in P(it corresponds to the standard case), 3 [solid line] goes around the universe in a given dire c- tion from OtoP′≡O′and 4 [dashed line] goes around the universe along another direction from OtoP′′≡O′′. On the left plot, we used the fundamental domain representation (i n which the 2–torus corresponds to a rectangle whose edges / and//are respectively identiﬁed; see ﬁgure 1). On the right plot, we depict the projection of their trajectory on a const ant time slice. The spacetime points O,O′,O′′,P,P′andP′′of Mare projected onto the same base point “1” in Σ. In order to solve exhaustively the twin paradox in a multi–connected space, one would like not only to com- pare separately the ages of the travellers with the age of the sedentary twin, but also to compare the ages of the various travellers when they respectively meet each other. It is clear that the only knowledge of the winding index of their loops does not allow us, in general, to compare their various proper time lapses. The only exception is that of the cylinder, where a larger winding number al- ways corresponds to a shorter proper time lapse. But for a torus of unequal lengths, for instance when the di- ameter of the hole is much larger than the diameter of the handle, a traveller may go straight around the handle many times with a winding index (0 , n), and yet be older than the traveller which goes straight only once around the hole with a winding index (1,0). The situation is still more striking with a double torus, indeed a hyperbolic surface instead of an Euclidean one (see e.g. [16]). The winding indexes become quadruplets of integers and, as for the simple torus, they cannot be compared to answer the question on the ages of the travellers. As we shall see below, this problem can be solved only by using an additional metric information. IV. LANGEVIN AND POINCAR ´E We have found a topological invariant attached to each twin’s worldline which accounts for the asymmetry be- tween their various inertial reference frames. Why is itso? In special relativity theory, two reference frames are equivalent if there is a Lorentz transformation from one frame of space-time coordinates to another system. The set of all Lorentz transformations is called the Poincar´ e group – a ten dimensional group which combines trans- lations and homogeneous Lorentz transformations called “boosts”. The non equivalence between the inertial frames is due to the fact that space topology breaks globally the Poincar´ e group. Indeed, cutting and pasting to compact- ify the spatial sections deﬁnes (i) particular directions, so that space, even if locally isotropic, is no more invariant under rotations, and (ii) a particular time: the one mea- sured by an observer whose 4–velocity is perpendicular to Σ (the twin 1 in our example). Let us call tthe proper time of such an observer; then the spacetime coordinates pof any point P∈ M can be decomposed in the iner- tial frame Kasp= (t,x), and the choice of a topology reduces to the choice of the identiﬁcations p= (t,x)≡(t, gx) =g(p), g∈Γ. (6) In the inertial frame K′of the traveller, the coordinates ofPare given by a Lorentz transformation L(p) = (t′,x′) with t′=γ(t−v.x),x′=γ(x−vt) (7) where γ≡(1−v2)−1/2. It is clear from (6) and (7) that ∀g/ne}ationslash∼Id,∀p, g ◦ L(p)/ne}ationslash=L ◦g(p). (8) The identiﬁcation (6) particularises a given foliation and spatial sections, leading to the existence of an absolute rest frame (the one of zero homotopy class). For any other observers, these identiﬁcations are relations be- tween events at diﬀerent times (and thus in diﬀerent spa- tial sections) and not a relation between points in a given spatial section. As pointed in [12], the observers 3 and 4 will ﬁnd that their constant time hypersurfaces do not match in the universal covering space and that there are points on these surfaces of simultaneity which are con- nected by timelike curves. Moreover, the only holonomy gsuch that g◦ L(p) =L ◦g(p) for all pis the identity g=Id, thus the holonomy group reduces to Γ = {Id}and Σ reduces to X. We deduce that the only topology com- patible with the Poincar´ e group is the trivial topology. In other words, the only ﬂat spaceform invariant under the full Poincar´ e group is the original simply–connected Minkowski spacetime, and any additional discrete iden- tiﬁcation group is incompatible with the Lorentz trans- formations. In conclusion, the oldest twin will always be the one of homotopy class {0}, and between two twins of same homotopy class, the oldest one will be the one who does not undergo any acceleration. We can rephrase Bondi’s formulation of the solution by saying that “there is only one way of a given homotopy class of getting from the ﬁrst meeting point to the second without acceleration”. 4This generalises the previous works [11–13] by adding topological considerations which are more general and hold whatever the shape of space is. As concluded in [12], “it is not suﬃcient that [the] motion [of the twin] is symmetrical in terms of acceleration felt and so on; it must also be symmetrical in terms of the way that their worldlines are embedded into the spacetime”; this latter symmetry is the one we have exhibited and which is encoded in the homotopy class. As mentioned in the previous section, the homotopy classes only tell us which twin is aging the fastest: the one who follows a straight loop homotopic to {0}. It does not provide a classiﬁcation of the ages (i.e. proper time lengths) along all the straight loops. To do this, some additional information is necessary, such as the various identiﬁcation lengths. Indeed there exists a simple cri- terion which works in all cases: a shorter spatial length in the universal covering space will always correspond to a longest proper time. To fully solve the question, it is therefore suﬃcient to draw the universal covering space as tessellated by the fundamental domains, and to mea- sure the lengths of the various straight paths joining the twin 1 position in the fundamental domain to its ghost positions in the adjacent domains (see ﬁgure 3). As usual in topology, all reasonings involving metrical measure- ments can be solved in the simply–connected universal covering space. OOOOO O O O O O OOOOO5 2 34 FIG. 3. Straight paths in the universal covering space of a (2+1)–spacetime with ﬂat, torus–like spatial sections. Pa ths 2, 3, 4, 5 are straight loops with respective winding indexes (0,1), (1,0, (1,1), (1,2), allowing the traveller twins to l eave and meet again the sedentary twin Owithout accelerating. The inertial worldlines are clearly not equivalent: the lon gest the spatial length in the universal covering space, the shor test the proper time travel in spacetime. In the framework of general relativity, general solu- tions of Einstein’s ﬁeld equations are curved spacetimes admitting no particular symmetry. However, all the ex- act known solutions admit symmetry groups (although less rich than the Poincar´ e group). For instance, the usual “big bang” cosmological models – described bythe Friedmann–Lemaˆ ıtre solutions – are assumed to be globally homogeneous and isotropic. From a geometrical point of view, this means that spacelike slices have con- stant curvature and that space is spherically symmet- ric about each point. In the language of group theory, the spacetime is invariant under a six-dimensional isom- etry group. The universal covering spaces of constant curvature are R3,S3orH3according to the zero, pos- itive or negative value of the curvature. Any identiﬁ- cation of points in these simply-connected spaces via a holonomy group lowers the dimension of their isometry group†; it preserves the three–dimensional homogeneity group (spacelike slices have still constant curvature), bu t it breaks down globally the isotropy group (at a given point there are a discrete set of preferred directions along which the universe does not look the same). Thus in Friedmann–Lemaˆ ıtre universes, (i) the expan- sion of the universe and (ii) the existence of a non–trivial topology for the constant time hypersurfaces both break the Poincar´ e invariance and single out the same “privi- leged” inertial observer who will age more quickly than any other twin: the one comoving with the cosmic ﬂuid – although aging more quickly than all her travelling sisters may be not a real privilege! [1] A. Einstein, “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K¨ orper”, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 891 (1905). [2] P. Langevin, “L’´ evolution de l’espace et du temps”, Sci - entiaX, 31 (1911). [3] R.H. Romer, “Twin paradox in special relativity”, Am. J. Phys. 27, 131–135 (1959). [4] E. F. Taylor and J.A. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics , Sec- ond Edition, Freeman, 1992. [5] W.G. Unruh, “Parallax distance, time, and the twin paradox”, Am. J. Phys. 49(6), 589–592 (1981). [6] H. Nikoli´ c, “Relativistic contraction of an accelerat ed rod”, Am. J. Phys. 67(11), 1007–1012 (1999). [7] R.H. Good, “Uniformly accelerated reference frame and twin paradox”, Am. J. Phys. 50, 232–238 (1982). [8] S.P. Boughn, “The case of the identically accelerated twins”, Am. J. Phys. 57(9), 791–793 (1989). [9] R. Perrin, “Twin paradox: a complete treatment from the point of view of each twin”, Am. J. Phys. 44, 317– 319 (1970). [10] J.C. Hafele and R.E. Keating, “Around-the-world atomi c clocks: Observed relativistic time gains”, Science, 177, 168-170 (1972). [11] C.H. Brans and D.R. Stewart, “Unaccelerated returning †There is one exception: the projective space, obtained by identifying the antipodal points of S3 5twin paradox in ﬂat spacetime”, Phys. Rev. D8, 1662– 1666 (1973). [12] R.J. Low, “An acceleration free version of the clock par a- dox”, Eur. J. Phys. 11, 25–27 (1990). [13] T. Dray, “The twin paradox revisited”, Am. J. Phys. 58 (9), 822-825 (1990). [14] H. Bondi, Relativity and common sense , Doubleday and Company Inc., N.Y. (1964). [15] R. Geroch, “Space–time structure from a global view- point”, in General relativity and cosmology , proceedings of course XLVII of the international course of physics “Enrico Fermi”, Ed. R.K. Sachs, Academic Press (New York, 1971). [16] M. Lachi` eze-Rey, J.-P. Luminet, “Cosmic topology”, Phys. Rep. 254, 135 (1995). [17] W.P. Thurston and J. Weeks, “The Mathematics of Three-Dimensional Manifolds”, Sci. Am., 251, 108–113 (July 1984); J-P. Luminet, G.D. Starkman and J.R. Weeks, “Is space ﬁnite?”, Sci. Am., 280, 90–97 (april 1999); J-P. Uzan, R. Lehoucq and J-P. Luminet, “New developments in the search for the topology of the uni- verse”, Proc. of the XIXthTexas meeting, Paris 14–18 december 1998, Eds. E. Aubourg, T. Montmerle, J. Paul and P. Peter, article no04/25. 6
Golden Bars of Consensus and the Truth Quark Scientists are imprisoned by Golden Bars of Consensus, says Burton Richter. A case in point is the mass of the Truth Quark. The consensus analysis of the experimental data indicates that the mass of the Truth Quark is about 170 GeV. On the other hand, an alternative analysis of the same date indicates that the mass of the Truth Quark is about 130 GeV. If the design of future experiments takes into account only the consensus value, then results of future experiments might be compromised. Burton Richter, in remarks at Stanford in 1999 (hep-ex/0001012) said "... The next big machine, the LHC, is under construction at CERN ... The two main experiments ATLAS and CMS will each have 1500 to 2000 collaborators. ... In the 500-strong collaborations of today, we already have a bureaucratic overlay to the science with committees that decide on the trigger, data analysis procedures, error analysis, speakers, paper publications, etc. The participating scientists are imprisoned by golden bars of consensus .... this will become more difficult as the collaborations grow to three times the size of today's largest. This needs thinking about and talking about, ...". Do the golden bars of consensus already imprison useful data and analysis? Consider, as an example, the mass of the T-quark . Table of Contents:16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 1 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.html( It is Figure 65 of the report. I have added blue and green colors to make discussion easier. )T-quark observations at Fermilab semileptonic data - tagged semileptonic data - dileptonic data Truth's Consequences How is this related to the physics model described at http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/d4d5e6hist.html ? What about indirect ElectroWeak determinations? What is the 170-180 GeV peak? Truth Ceng Zi In April 1994, CDF at Fermilab (in FERMILAB-PUB-94/097-E) reported a T-quark mass of 174 (+/-10)(+13/-12) GeV. The data analyzed by CDF included the 26-event histogram shown above for W + (3 or more) jets, without b-tags. Some of the CDF histogram events, shown in blue, are in the 150-190 GeV range and do support the CDF analysis. However, there is a peak of 8 events in the 140-150 GeV bin, shown in green, that were excluded from the analysis by CDF, saying (on page 140 of the report) "... the bin with masses between 140 and 150 GeV/c^2 has eight events. We assume the mass combinations in the 140 to 150 GeV/c^2 bin represent a statistical fluctuation since their width is narrower than expected for a top signal . ...". If the 140-150 GeV peak were only a statistical fluctuation seen by the CDF detector, one would not expect to find such a peak repeated in the data seen by the D0 detector at Fermilab. However, in March 1997, D0 (in hep-ex/9703008) reported a T-quark mass of 173.3 GeV (+/- 5.6 stat +/- 6.2 syst), based on data including a histogram similar to Figure 65 of the April 1994 CDF report which is Figure 3 of the D0 report, to which I have added blue and green colors to make discussion easier:16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 2 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.htmlSome of the D0 histogram events, shown in blue, are are in the 150-190 GeV range and do support the CDF analysis. However, similar to the 140-150 GeV bin peak seen and thrown out by CDF, there is a peak of 5 events in the 130-140 GeV bin, shown in green , that were excluded from the analysis by D0. I did not see in the D0 report an explicit discussion of the 5-event peak in the 130-140 GeV bin. Those 130-150 GeV peaks are from untagged semileptonic events. Tagged semileptonic events may be a more reliable measure of T-quark mass, although there are fewer of them, so that statistics are not as good. 16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 3 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.htmlCDF (in hep-ex/9801014, dated 30 September 1997) reported a T-quark mass of 175.9 +/- 4.8(stat.) +/- 4.9(syst.) GeV based on events that were either SVX tagged, SVX double tagged, or untagged. However, CDF analysis of tagged semileptonic events (14 of them) gave a T-quark Mass of 142 GeV (+33, -14), as shown in their Figure 2, which is a plot of events/10 GeV bin vs. Reconstructed Mass in GeV: D0 (in hep-ex/9801025) also analyzed tagged semileptonic events, with the result shown in their figure 25: The figure shows 3 events in the 130-150 GeV range , one event in the 170-180 GeV bin, andone event in the 200-210 GeV bin. According to footnote 10 of hep-ex/9801025, One event which would have otherwise passed the cuts, event (95653; 10822), was removed by D0 from its analysis because it was selected by the dilepton mass analysis. If this event is treated as a l + jets candidate, it hasa fit Chi-squared of 0.92 and fitted Truth Quark mass of 138.7 GeV .16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 4 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.html Dilepton events may be the most reliable measure of T-quark mass, although they are the least numerous type of event, so that statistics are not so good. In October 1998 (in hep-ex/9810029) CDF analyzed 8 dilepton events and reported a T- quark mass of 167.4 +/- 10.3(stat) +/- 4.8(syst) GeV. Figure 2 of the report shows the 8 events: I have colored green the events with T-quark mass less than 160 GeV, and blue the events with T-quark mass greater than 160 GeV. The hep-ex/9810029 CDF report stated that it "... supersedes our previously reported result in the dilepton channel ...". The superseded previous CDF dilepton report (hep-ex/9802017) analyzed 9 events out of a total of 11 events, which 11 events are shown on the following histogram: 16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 5 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.htmlI have colored green the events with T-quark mass less than 150 GeV, and blue the events with T-quark mass greater than 150 GeV. Note first, that in the earlier 11-event histogram 5 events are shown as greater than 150 GeV, but only 4 events are shown as greater than 160 GeV, while in the 8-event revised histogram 5 events are shown as greater than 160 GeV. This indicates to me that some changes in the analysis have shifted the event mass assignments upward by about 10 GeV. Note second, that the earlier 11-event histogram contains 3 events from 120-140 GeV that are omitted from the 8-event revised histogram . D0 (in hep-ex/9706014 and hep-ex/9808029) has analyzed 6 dilepton events, reporting a T-quark mass of about 168.4 GeV. The 1997 UC Berkeley PhD thesis of Erich Ward Varnes which can be found on the web at http://wwwd0.fnal.gov/publications_talks/thesis/ thesis.html contains details of the events and the D0 analyses. Each of the 6 events has its own characteristics. In this letter I will only discuss one of them, Run 84676 Event 12814, an electron-muon dilepton event. This figure from page 159 of the Varnes thesis, shows a T-quark mass likelihood plot calculated by the neutrino weighting algorithm. 16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 6 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.htmlIn this event there were 3 jets instead of the 2 jets you would normally expect in a Dilepton event. The solid line is the plot if all 3 jets are included, and the dashed line is the plot if only 2 of the jets are included by excluding the third (lowest transverse energy) jet. The 3-jet interpretation supports the 170 GeV mass favored by the Fermilab consensus, while the 2-jet interpretation supports a 130-140 GeV mass analysis that may be imprisoned by the golden bars of Fermilab consensus. Could the golden bars of consensus do any real harm to physics ? Consider the work going on now in planning experiments to be done on future machines, such as the LHC. A recent paper (hep-ph/0002205), The Standard Model Instability and the Scale of New Physics, by J.A. Casas, V. Di Clemente and M. Quiros, concludes that "... with the present lower bounds on the Higgs mass, the new physics could easily (but not necessarily) escape detection in the present and future accelerators . ...". They state "...In this paper we will fix Mt to its experimental mean value and disregard the effect due to the experimental error delta_Mt. ...". If Fermilab had not bound Casas, Di Clemente, and Quiros within the golden bars of consensus of T-quark mass Mt at about 175 GeV, then their paper might have included effects of different values of Mt. In other words, 16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 7 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.htmlrestriction of consideration of T-quark masses to around 175 GeV could produce a much more pessimistic view of the likelihood of success of new physics searches at LHC , while breaking the golden bars of consensus to give freedom to consideration of T-quark masses well below 175 GeV produces a much more optimistic view of the likelihood of success of new physics searches at LHC. Although the economies contributing to the LHC are now prosperous enough to say that it will be built, things can change (and, as was the case for the SSC, not always for the better). Therefore, I don't think that it is a good idea to imprison ideas that can lead to optimism about the potential for discovery at the LHC. Since the T-quark is a key part of the truth of nature that physics seeks to understand, I prefer to call it the Truth quark (although I realize that now I am in a tiny minority, as most now call it Top). 16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 8 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.htmlHow are the Golden Bonds of Consensus related to my D4-D5-E6-E7 physics model ? If the Truth quark mass is about 130 GeV, it is consistent with the prediction of my D4-D5-E6-E7 physics model made in 1984, shown as the dark blue line : My D4-D5-E6-E7 physics model prediction was made before CERN announced in 1984 the "discovery" of the Truth quark with mass 40 GeV, shown as purple ,and that during the time that the CERN announcement was generally considered to be valid, I still maintained that CERN was wrong and that my prediction was right. My D4-D5-E6-E7 physics model prediction was consistent with the ARGUS indirect B-Bbar experimental determination, shown as gold;and with the Dalitz-Goldstein analysis of 1988-89 CDF events, shown in red.Thegreen bar represents my analysis of Fermilab's Run 1, and the cyan bar represents Fermilab's analysis of that data. What about indirect ElectroWeak determinations ? 16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 9 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.htmlThe chart above, from Figure 6 of Chris Quigg's paper hep-ph/0001145, shows "... and 95% confidence-level lower bounds on the top-quark mass inferred from direct searches in e + e annihilations ( ) and in pbar-p collisions, assuming that standard decay modes dominate ( ). An indirect lower bound, derived from the W-boson width inferred from pbar-p to (W or Z) + anything, is shown as the . Direct measurements of mt by the CDF ( ) and D0 ( ) Collaborations are shown at the time of initial evidence, discovery claim, and at the conclusion of Run 1. The world average from direct observations is shown as the crossed box. ...". I have added the line at 130 GeV, and the color of for the region or Fermilab analysis of CDF and D0 events and the color of for the region of my analysis of them.Indirect determinations of the top-quark mass from fits to electroweak observables (open circles) solid line broken line dot-dashed line triangles inverted triangles blue cyan green If the 170-180 GeV peak is not the Truth quark, then what is it ? I don't know for sure, but maybe it is poorly understood background, perhaps related to miscounting the number of jets associated with events, and/or perhaps related to some phenomena seen at HERA and CERN. According to hep-ex/9910012 by the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations at HERA: "...Between mid-1994 and the end of 1997 the electron-proton collider HERA at DESY has been operated ... . In this period, ZEUS and H1 have collected e + p data samples corresponding to integrated luminosities of 47.7 pb^(-1) and 37 pb^(-1), respectively. In 1998 and the first half of 1999, each experiment has taken about 15 pb^(-1) of ... data ... The excess in the H1 data is still present at Me = 200 GeV but has not been corroborated by the 1997 data. Also ZEUS observes an excess at Mej > 200 GeV; however, the decay angular distribution does not support a LQ interpretation ... 16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 10 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.html... The symbols with statistical error bars represent the data, the histograms the DIS MC. The H1 data are shown before (open triangles) and after (full dots, hatched histogram) a cut y>ymin(Me). The shaded area indicates the uncertainty of the SM prediction. ...". In hep-ex/0001014, Salvatore Mele of CERN says, [with some comments by me set off by brackets]: "... A data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 232 pb^ (-1) was collected in 1997 and 1998 by the L3 experiment at LEP in e+ e- collisions at centre-of-mass energies between 181.7 GeV and 188.7 GeV. ... the cross sections for single W production ... [are compared in this figure] ...Recent Results from the L3 Experiment, ... to the SM predictions obtained with the EXCALIBUR and GRC4F MC [Monte Carlo] programs. ...".16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 11 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.htmlThe data in the 175 GeV region is consistent with 4 generations of neutrinos, rather than 3, also indicating to me that processes in that region are incompletely understood. Frank D. (Tony) Smith, Jr. 2000 - 5760 - Year of Metal Dragon http://tony.ai http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/TShome.html The first paper I ever put on the Los Alamos e-print archive, hep-ph/9301210 - Calculation of 130 GeV Mass for T-Quark, was at MENTOR.LANL.GOV for years: A few people, including me, who like the concepts of Truth and Beauty, still call the T-Quark the Truth Quark instead of the Top Quark. I also call it , because Ceng Zi means quark in the language of the physicist who first proposed it, .Truth Ceng Zi Liu Yao-Yang Around 1960, he invented the Ceng Zi (quark) model of particle physics. He was working at the University of Science and Technology of China, which was then located at Beijing, when he invented the Ceng Zi model. He wrote a paper and submitted it to a Chinese journal. It was turned down because the editors thought the paper was not correct. After the quark model had been independently re-invented around 1962-1964, with most of the credit going to Murray Gell-Mann, the editors apologized for rejecting the paper. Liu Yao-Yang is, the last that I heard, still working at the University of Science and Technology of China, which is now at Anhui, in the fields of atomic and molecular physics, quantum field theory, and quantization of gravity.16/6/00 2:44 PM Truth Quark aka Top Quark Golden Bonds of Consensus Page 12 of 12 file:///iPurple/arXiv%20put%20GBC60/GBC60TQ%20stuff/tsGBC60.html
- 1 -Combining Research Methods and Results from Psychology and Physics in the Investigation of Quantum Mechanics Douglas M. Snyder Analysis of modern physical theory indicates that there is a fundamental link between the observing, thinking individual and the physical world (e.g., Epstein, 1945; Renninger, 1960; Snyder, 1986, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995; Wigner, 1983). This being the case, both psychological research methodology and results should be relevant to the exploration of this link. It is important to provide an example of how psychology can add in a unique way to the exploration of the link between cognition and the physical world found in modern physical theory. A prototype for more complicated investigations is presented through exploring a question in quantum mechanics. Gedankenexperiments are proposed that indicate that research from psychology is relevant to understanding the relationship between perception andthe physical world in quantum mechanics. These gedankenexperiments rely onresearch in psychology concerning the perceptual and behavioral adaptation of ahuman observer to inversion of incoming light. The gedankenexperiments presented demonstrate how the uncertainty principle may be affected by psychological phenomena. The uncertainty principle involves the inability in quantum mechanics to simultaneously measure observable quantities describedby non-commuting Hermitian operators (e.g., the position and momentum of a particle along a particular spatial axis). 1 Further, the gedankenexperiments show that it may be possible to know more than one value at a time from a set of what appear to be mutually exclusive values for a quantity. When light is reflected from an object in the world and into the eye, the structure of the eye is such that the image on the retina corresponding to the object is up-down and right-left reversed when compared to the position of the object (Dolezal, 1982; Kandel, Schwartz, & Jessell, 1991). The area of psychological research relevant to the proposed gedankenexperiments specifically concerns the effect of inversion of incoming light on visual experience. (In the context of this paper, unless more precisely specified, the terms ÒinversionÓ and ÒinvertedÓ will refer to either rotation of the incoming 1 Feynman, Leighton, and Sands's (1965) implication that physical interaction is responsible for the constraints of the uncertainty principle is not the case.Combining Research - 2 -light 180o around the line of sight, or the reflection [or flipping] of incoming light between the top and lower halves of the visual field along the horizontal separating them.) First, this research will be reviewed. Then the gedanken- experiments will be described. The Effect of Inversion of Incoming Light on Visual Perception and Visually Guided Behavior In the late 1800s, Stratton (1896, 1897a, 1897b) investigated the effects on visual experience of rotating the incoming light 180o around the line of sight such that the retinal images were right side up instead of being in their customary inverted orientation. StrattonÕs results were remarkable. Incommenting on the earlier experiment, he wrote: In fact, the difficulty of seeing things upright by means of upright retinal images seems to consist solely in the resistance offered by the long-established experience. There is certainly nopeculiar inherent difficulty arising from the new conditions themselves. If no previous experience had been stored up to stand in opposition to the new perceptions, it would be absurd tosuppose that the visual perceptions in such a case would seem inverted. Any visual field in which the relations of the seen parts to one another would always correspond to the relations found by touch and muscular movement would give us ÔuprightÕvision, whether the optic image lay upright, inverted, or at any intermediate angle whatever on the retina. (Stratton, 1896, p. 617) His comments apply as well to the results of the second, more thorough experiment. In his report on the second experiment, he wrote: The inverted position of the retinal image is, therefore, not essential to Ôupright vision,Õ for it is not essential to a harmony between touch and sight, which, in the final a nalysis, is the real meaning of upright vision. For some visual objects may be inverted with respect to other visual objects, but the whole system of visual objects can never by itself be either inverted or upright. It could be inverted or upright only with respect to certain non-visual experiences with which I might compare my visual system--in other words, with respect to my tactual or motor perceptions. (Stratton, 1897b, pp. 475-476)Combining Research - 3 -Subsequent work by other researchers in which all incoming light was rotated 180o around the line of sight (e.g., Ewert, 1930; Snyder & Pr onko, 1952) or up-down reversed (the top and bottom halves of the visual field are reversed) (e.g., Dolezal, 1982; Kohler, 1962, 1964) has for the most part provided substantial support for StrattonÕs finding concerning the relative natureof upright vision. The research indicates that there is a high degree of flexibility of the visual system with regard to inversion of incoming visual stimulation onthe retina, including that an observer subject to such reversal quickly regains very significant competency in interacting with the environment. For example, Snyder and Pronko (1952) found in their study: During the 30-day period that the inverting lenses were worn, the visuo-motor coordinations were refashioned so that the subject performed even better than before the lenses were put on....Introducing the inverted visual field for 30 days and subsequent ÒnormalizationÓ (lenses removed), [ sic] modified the learning situation. However, the subject went on learning despite these disrupting factors (p. 116). In general, visual experience restabilizes quickly considering the relatively very brief period of time that the light is inverted compared to the subjectsÕ life experiences prior to their participation in one of the experiments. Visual experience regains a sense of normalcy and is accompanied by the coordinationbetween touch and vision that Stratton (1897b) wrote is Òthe real meaning of upright visionÓ (p. 497) (Dolezal, 1982; Erismann & Kohler, 1953, 1958; Kohler, 1962, 1964; Pronko & Snyder, 1951; Snyder & Pronko, 1952). As alluded to in the above quote from Snyder and Pronko and as found by Ewert (1930), in the laboratory, competency on sensorimotor tasks developed with unrotated light has been shown to transfer to circumstances where incoming light is rotated 180 o (Snyder & Pronko, 1952). Furthermore, increased competency on the same sensorimotor tasks subsequently developed with rotated light has been shown to transfer to circumstances where the incoming light is no longer rotated 180o (Ewert, 1930; Snyder & Pr onko, 1952). The learning curve for these tasks was in general fairly smooth, except for a spike when the incoming light was first rotated 180o around the line of sight. In natural settings, individuals wearing an optical apparatus that inverted incoming light have reported such activities as driving an automobile, riding a motorcycle, or riding a bicycle, with a significant degree of skill within arelatively short time of putting on the apparatus for the first time (Dolezal, 1982;Combining Research - 4 -Erismann & Kohler, 1953, 1958; Kohler, 1962; Snyder & Pronko, 1952). In sum, research has indicated that after a relatively brief period of time exposed to inverted light, visual experience in general appears normal and as this visual experience exists in conjunction with the recaptured competency of the individual in the environment, the visual field is upright, just as it was upright before the incoming light was inverted. The citations to Erismann and Kohler (1953, 1958) and to Pronko and Snyder (1951) refer to films that provide convincing evidence of both perceptual and behavioral adaptation to inversionof incoming light. In a related study, Brown (1928) wore goggles with prisms that rotated incoming light 75 o around the line of sight for one week, and he adapted to this rotation to a significant degree. This adaptation occurred even though he described his apparatus as Òtoo unwieldyÓ (p. 134) to wear every night on a one-half mile trip to his university where various tests were run. Other work investigating adaptation of the visual system to alterations in incoming light that did not involve inversion of this light has also indicated a very high degree of flexibility in the operation of the visual system (e.g., Gibson, 1933; Held, 1965; Held & Freedman, 1963). Stratton (1899) conducted an experiment in which through the use of a specific arrangement of mirrors his body image and immediate surroundings were projected in what without adaptation would be the horizontal direction out from his body at the level just above his shoulders, his head in the reflected image of his body closest to his body and the front of his body facing up. In the very brief time that Stratton wore the mirror arrangement, he found that visual perception and visually guided action showed significant adaptation to theincoming light. Stratton wrote: The whole experience [in this experiment] was thus so similar to the one with the inverting lenses that I hesitate to present it even in this brief outline. But under the circumstances the very similarity is a distinct addition to the data from the previous experiment, since it shows that the introduction of the new factor--that of distance--does not prevent an ultimate spatial concord [between the haptic, kinesthetic, and visual senses]....The experiment thus suggests that the principle stated in an earlier paper--that in the end we would feel a thing to be wherever we constantly saw it--can be justified in a wider sense that I then intended it to be taken. (Stratton, 1899, pp. 497-498)Combining Research - 5 -Ewert (1930) and Munn (1 955/1965) have disputed the finding that visual experience becomes upright after experience with rotated incoming light. It should be noted, though, that the major concern of Ewert and Munn is not somuch the subjectÕs phenomenal experience with rotated light but rather with theinterpretation of what this phenomenal experience means. For example, Munn (1955/1965), who was one of EwertÕs subjects, wrote: Localizing reactions became so automatic at times that a Òfeeling of normalcyÓ was present. This is probably the feeling reported by Stratton and interpreted as Òseeing right-side up.Ó (p. 293) Or, Ewert concluded that: In all forms of activity where overt localizing responses are present there is rapid adjustment to the distracting visualinterference until at the end of 14 days of pr actice the interference is entirely overcome in some of the activities investigated and almost overcome in the other forms....Constant interference during visual disorientation does not prevent the steady growth of a habit. (Ewert, 1930, pp. 353; 357) Snyder and Pronko (1952) performed an experiment similar in many respects to EwertÕs. Munn (1955/1965) wrote about Snyder and PronkoÕs work: ÒThe results were essentially like his [EwertÕs]Ó (p. 294). In contrast to Ewert, Snyder and Pronko concluded: It appears that perceivings form a behavior sequence going back into the individualÕs past. If the subject of the present experiment had always worn the inverting lenses, his past perceivings would have been of a piece with those of the moment when the question [ÒWell, how do things look to you? Are they upside-down?Ó (p. 113)] was directed at him. Obviously, then, they would not have been in contrast with the latter and would not have called attention to themselves. Stated in another way, if this subject had somehow developed amnesia at the point at which he put on the inverting lenses, then things could not appear upside-down because there would be no basis of comparison or contrast. That they did appear upside-down is clearly a strict function of his previously acquired perceivings. (pp. 113-114)Combining Research - 6 -In A History of Experimental Psychology , Boring (1929/1950) wrote about StrattonÕs work: In 1896 Stratton put the matter to test, having his subjects [actually only Stratton himself] wear a system of lenses which reversed the retinal image and made it right side up. The expected happened. The perceived world looked upside down for a time and then became reversed. Taking the glasses off resulted once again in reversal which was soon corrected. Stratton was not, however, confused by the homunculus. He described how up was nothing in the visual sensory pattern other than the opposite of down, and that orientation is achieved by the relation of the visual pattern to somothesis and behavior. When you reach up to get an object imaged at the top of the retina, then you have indeed got the visual field reversed and will not find the object unless you have on StrattonÕs lenses. Ewert repeated this experiment in 1930, with similar results [italics added]....Had the view of a freely perceiving agent in thebrain not been so str ongly entrenched, this problem could not have continued to seem so important in 1604, 1691, 1709, 1838, 1896 and 1930. (p. 678) Boring knew of EwertÕs work and saw that the empirical results obtained by Ewert supported StrattonÕs conclusion even if EwertÕs own conclusion based on the empirical results he found was not in agreement with StrattonÕs. Dolezal (1982) wrote concerning the results of his experiment and those found in other experiments involving the inversion of incoming light to the observer: In the course of living in a world transformed, the observerÕs initial fears become calmed, he or she finds the discomforts quite tolerable, the strange sights fade and become common, and ineptness changes to competency. (p. 301) A Biperceptual Capability Dolezal proposed that the observer who adapts to inversion of incoming light is biperceptual and biperformatory . Biperceptual refers to the simultaneous existence of the visual perceptual capabilities associated with both pre-inversion and inversion conditions. These capabilities may be considered distinct reference frames for the individual who has undergone inversion ofCombining Research - 7 -incoming light. Similarly, biperformatory refers to the simultaneous existence of an individualÕs capabilities to act competently in the environment both before and after inversion of the incoming light. These capabilities as well are dividedinto distinct frameworks for the individual who has experienced and adapted to this inversion of incoming light. Dolezal (1982) wrote: The adapted observer appears to differ from the unadapted observer in several main r espects. After some 200 hours of living with reversing prisms, an observer once again experiencesvisual stability of the perturbed environment [i.e., up-down reversal of incoming light]. This is true for a wide range of ratesof head movements (HMs). Moreover, the adapted observer hasacquired what may be called another ÒpersonalityÓ (i.e., he or she has the dual facility to be perceptually and emotionally comfortable and to act competently both with and without transforming prisms). The adapted observer is thus a very different creature from the unadapted observer--somewhat like someone with a second language or a novel set of skills that can only be directly displayed under special circumstances (cf. state- dependent learning and recall). The observer becomes what I call biperceptual and biperformatory....In general, the adapted observer is capable of living in both wor lds, under both sets of information conditions and behavioral requirements withroughly equal comfort and competence. (p. 297) Consider the following observation reported by the subject in Snyder and PronkoÕs study, who happened to be Snyder, that supports DolezalÕs thesis: Toward the end of the experiment [i.e., the period in which the subject wore the inverting glasses], the subject was adequately adjusted [adapted]. The following insightful experience occurred. He was observing the scene from a tall building. Suddenly someone a sked, ÒWell, how do things look to you? Are they upside-down?Ó The subject replied, ÒI wish you hadnÕt asked me. Things were all right until you popped the question at me. Now, when I recall how they did look before I put on these lenses, I must answer that they do look upside down now. But until theCombining Research - 8 -moment that you asked me I was absolutely unaware of it and hadnÕt given a thought to the question of whether things were right-side-up or upside-down.Ó (Snyder & Pronko, 1952, p. 113) In a study of retention of the effects of such inversion, Snyder and Snyder (1957) found that when the inverted conditions were reintroduced for a subject some time after the subjectÕs initial experience with inverted light, the subjectÕs adjustment the second time to the inverted light indicated that learningoccurred as a result of the first experience and had been retained over a two-yearperiod between the first and second experiences with inversion of the incoming light. Specifically, Snyder and Snyder found that the time to complete various tasks consistently took less time in the second experience than in the first. Thelearning curves in the first and second experiences were very similar for each of the tasks, only in the s econd exposure the times to complete the tasks were consistently lower than the times to complete them in the first exposure. In his research, Stratton noted how quickly the perceptual framework of the subject exposed to inverted incoming light could switch between the unadapted and the adapted orientation. He also noted the possibility of their coexistence. For example, on the seventh day of wearing his optical apparatus in his second experiment with inverted light, Stratton (1897b) wrote: When I watched one of my limbs in motion, no involuntary suggestion arose that it was in any other place or moved in any other direction than as sight actually reported it, except that in moving my arm a slightly discordant group of sensations came from my unseen shoulder. If, while looking at the member, I summoned an image of it in its old position, then I could feel thelimb there too. But this latter was a relatively weak affair, and cost effort. When I looked away from it, however, I involuntarily felt it in its pre-experimental position, although at the same time conscious of a solicitation to feel it in its new position. This representation of the moving part in terms of the new vision waxed and waned in strength, so that it was sometimes more vivid than the old, and sometimes even completely overshadowed it. (p. 465) It is remarkable that the visual system has demonstrated a great degree of flexibility in the inversion experiments given the degree of artificialityCombining Research - 9 -introduced into the experimental circumstances by the optical apparatuses that have been used. For example, in the inverted light experiments, Stratton used adevice that allowed for incoming light to only one eye while the other eye was covered. EwertÕs device was lightweight but allowed for a limited visual field. In an attempt to widen the visual field over that of most other experiments in which all incoming light is inverted for an extended period of time, Dolezal (1982) built his optical device out of a football helmet and inserted glass prisms in the limited space usually left open for a football player to see. His device weighed 8 pounds, 6 ounces. There is further work to be done concerning the effect of inverted light on visual experience and visually guided action. But thebasic result that there is significant adaptation in visual experience and visually guided action to inversion of incoming light has been established (Snyder, 1992, 1993, 1995). Hard Wiring of the Visual System and the Isotropy of Space Originally, Stratton was concerned with showing that two theories concerning inversion of incoming light were incorrect. Essentially, these theories maintained some sort of hard-wiring of either the neural component of the visual system (the projection theory) or its supporting musculature (the eye movement theory). In the projection theory, inversion of the retinal image was needed because of the crossing of the lines of direction of light from external objects when light from the external world moves through the eye. Perception was considered to depend on these lines of direction that projected outward to the upright objects in the physical world from which the light rays originated. The eye movement theory related to the use of the musculature about the eye to provide definitive information about the correct position of objects in the world. Thus, if the eyes move upward in their sockets, they see the upper partsof objects in the physical world, and if the eyes move downward in their sockets, they see the lower part of these objects in the physical world. In this process, though, movement of the eye upward, for example, results in the lower portion of the retina receiving more of the incoming light. Inversion of the incoming light would help to correct this problem and could provide the basis for indicating the upright nature of the physical world. Many scholars have believed the tenet behind the projection and eye movement theories that there is only one way the visual system can function in order to perceive the physical world as upright. This is an assumption thatCombining Research - 10 -Boring (1929/1950) maintained was based on the notion of the homunculus. It can be seen in the descriptions of the projection and eye movement theories that they both have another more basic tenet as an assumption regarding the physicalworld. This assumption is that the physical world itself has an absolute status regarding its being upright. For example, if the physical world were indeed upside down, would scholars seriously entertain a theory of visual perception based on the hard wiring of the visual system? The assumption that the physical world has an absolute status regarding its being upright violates the isotropy of space in that space is not fundamentally the same in different directions. Manipulating Visual Perception in the Investigation of a Physical System How does this adaptability of visual experience and visually guided behavior to inversion of incoming light help in the analysis of modern physical theory? Consider the spin angular momentum of an electron, a quantity intrinsic to the electron. (A classical analog to this quantity would be the angular momentum of a spi nning top.) Quantum mechanics predicts that it is possible to measure the component of this momentum along any one of three orthogonal axes, x, y, and z (three spatial axes all at right angles to one another). The spin component of the electron along the z axis, or any other spatial axis, can have one of two values when measured (i.e., +1/2 h/2p and -1/2 h/2p). Assume in an experiment that this measurement of the electron occurs in the following way. Through the use of a Stern-Gerlach apparatus (Eisberg and Resnick, 1974/1985; Liboff, 1993), a nonuniform magnetic field oriented along the z axis is placed in the path of the electron. The value of the spin component of an electron along the z axis can be determined with the Stern-Gerlach apparatus because the electron will take one path in the apparatusif it has one value and will take another path in the apparatus if it has the other value. As an electron exits the apparatus from one of two locations, indicating which one of two paths the electron took through the apparatus and thus the value of its spin component along the axis of the magnetic field of the apparatus, detectors placed at the exits of the apparatus detect the electron. A human observer inspecting these detectors at the exits of the Stern-Gerlach apparatus then can determine which path the electron took and the value of its spin component along the axis of the magnetic field of the apparatus and its gradient.Combining Research - 11 -Assume the z axis is in the vertical direction relative to the subject, appearing to go up and down. The two values of the spin component along the z axis can be designated spin up or spin down according to the motion of electrons passing through the Stern-Gerlach apparatus relative to the vertical axis. Assume that the y axis runs perpendicular to the ideal plane formed by the subjectÕs face and that prior to entering the nonuniform magnetic field the electron is traveling along this axis. Assume that the x axis runs horizontally relative to the subject, from side to side. The experimental circumstances are depicted in Figure 31, where + and - refer to the positive and negative directionsalong a spatial axis. According to quantum mechanics, precise knowledge resulting from measurement of one of the spin components means that knowledge of each of the other two spin components is completely uncertain. Precise knowledge of the component along the z axis, for example, means that knowledge of each of the components along the x and y axes is completely uncertain. This limitation concerning the knowledge of certain paired quantities in quantum mechanics also characterizes the simultaneous precise determination ofthe position and momentum of an electron along a spatial axis (Eisberg and Resnick, 1985; Liboff, 1992). Precise knowledge of the electronÕs momentum entails complete uncertainty regarding its position, and precise knowledge of itsposition entails complete uncertainty regarding its momentum. As Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (1935) wrote: It is shown in quantum mechanics that, if the operators corresponding to two physical quantities, say A and B, do not commute, that is, if AB ¹ BA, then the precise knowledge of one of them precludes such a knowledge of the other. Furthermore, any attempt to determine the latter experimentally will alter the state of the system in such a way as to destroy the knowledge of the first. (p. 778) Where A and B are the operators corresponding to the components of the position and momentum of an electron, respectively, along a particular spatial axis, they do not commute. Similarly, where A and B are the operators for any two components along orthogonal spatial axes of the spin angular momentum of an electron, they do not commute. One can use an apparatus like that developed by Stratton to rotate the incoming light to an experimental subject such that the light is rotated around theCombining Research - 12 -z axis for O x axis for Odetector detectorspin up spin downdirection of magnetic field and gradient y axis for O electrons traveling toward Stern-Gerlach apparatusObserver O+ Observer O, not wearing the optical apparatus, viewing the spin component along the z axis in the spatial structure of O of electrons traveling through a Stern-Gerlach apparatus without rotation of the visual field.Figure 31_Combining Research - 13 -y axis 90o. Then, what was information concerning the z axis is now information concerning the x axis as concerns the light impinging on the subjectÕs retina. Given StrattonÕs results, there is a good possibility that, after a period of orientation with this apparatus, particularly if it is worn for an uninterrupted period and the subject is allowed to move freely in the naturalenvironment, the subject will see the electron moving up or down and not sideways. Indeed, the natural scenarios tested by Stratton and others are much more complex than the scenario need be that could be presented to an observer in a laboratory setting observing the path of an electron along a spatial axis in aninhomogeneous magnetic field like that created by a Stern-Gerlach apparatus. Itdoes appear that adaptation to inverted light depends to a significant degree on asubjectÕs experience in moving in his or her natural environment while incoming light is inverted by the optical apparatus. Because of the uncomplicated nature of the adaptation needed in the proposed experiment, though, the amount of sensorimotor experience in the natural environment required by the subject for the necessary degree of adaptation of the visual system to occur should not be great. It should be emphasized that research has indicated that the shift in the spatial structure of the observer that depends on sensorimotor experience involves variables pertaining to the individual, for example the correspondence of kinesthetic and haptic sensation with visual perception that develops over time. This correspondence among sensory modalities is not determined by the object or objects in the physical world that are perceived. Once there is a significant degree of adaptation in the subjectÕs visual experience, according to the information impinging on the subjectÕs retina, the subject is measuring what in the original situation without rotation of the incoming light is the x axis (Figure 32). What for observers in the original situation is up and down along the z axis is for the subject up and down along the x axis, where the x axis is labeled in terms of the spatial structure associated with the observer who does not wear the optical apparatus. For the subject wearing the optical apparatus and adapted to the rotated incoming light, the spin components along the y and z axes of the spatial structure associated with the observer who does not wear the optical apparatus are completely uncertain. It is important to note that for the observer wearing the optical apparatus and adapted to the rotated light, in his or her shifted spatial structure, the z axis runs along the vertical or upright direction just as the z axis runs along theCombining Research - 14 -+ optical apparatus detector detectorspin up for O' spin down for O'y axis for O and O' electrons traveling toward Stern-Gerlach apparatusdirection of magnetic field and gradient for O'(x axis for O' in spatial structure of O) x axis for O'Observer O'z axis for O' (z axis for O' in spatial structure of O)+ ++ Observer O', adapted to wearing the optical apparatus, viewing the spin component along the z axis in the spatial structure of O' of electrons traveling through a Stern-Gerlach apparatus with 90 degree rotation of the visual field, in terms of the spatial structure of O, around the y axis. ( x and z axes for O' in spatial structure of O, who does not wear the optical apparatus, are shown.)Figure 32__ __Combining Research - 15 -vertical or upright direction for the observer who does not wear the optical apparatus. The observer adapted to the incoming light and wearing the optical apparatus measures the spin component in his or her shifted spatial structure along the z axis, just as the observer who does not wear the optical apparatus measures the spin component along the z axis in his or her spatial structure. It appears possible to know the precise values for two components along orthogonal axes of the spin angular momentum of an electron at the sametime for a particular spatial structure, where one takes into account one of the orthogonal axes as it is perceived by an observer using a different spatial structure. The key to this gedankenexperiment is that a basic shift has occurred in the spatial structure for the observer who wears the optical apparatus and adapts to the rotated incoming light. This shifted spatial structure has the same significance for this observer as the spatial structure of the observer who does not wear the optical apparatus has for this latter observer. This basic gedankenexperiment shows in a particular instance that it is possible that the uncertainty principle is conditioned by a link between the spatial structure of anobserver in the physical world and the orientation of incoming light relative to the observer. Of particular importance is the evidence that there are factors specific to the observer in the development of an individualÕs spatial structure. Evidence supporting a biperceptual character of visual perception after adaptation to inversion of incoming light has been noted. This biperceptual character of visual perception concerns the simultaneous existence of the distinctvisual perceptual capabilities associated with both pre-inversion and post- inversion conditions. It may be po ssible for one subject in the experiment outlined above involving spin angular momentum components along orthogonalspatial axes to be involved in mutually exclusive situations simultaneouslyconcerning the same concrete physical circumstances. That is, the adapted subject may be able to instantly shift from being involved in one of the experimental scenarios to the other. A 180 o Rotation There is another circumstance besides that already discussed that is perhaps even more surprising. Consider that an optical apparatus is used that rotates incoming light 180o around the line of sight (Figure 33). For the subject wearing the apparatus but not yet adapted, the negative direction of the z axis is associated with spin up and the positive direction of the z axis is associated with spin down. O nce a significant degree of adaptation in the subjectÕs visualCombining Research - 16 -experience occurs, when the subject observes that an electron has spin up in the positive direction of the z axis, according to the information impinging on the subjectÕs retina the subject is measuring what in the original situation without rotation of the incoming light is spin up in the negative direction of the z axis. Similarly, when the subject observes that an electron has spin down in the negative direction of the z axis, according to the information impinging on the subjectÕs retina the subject is measuring what in the original situation without rotation of the incoming light is spin down in the positive direction of the z axis. If this result is considered in terms of the Schrdinger cat gedankenexperiment (Schrdinger, 1935/1983), it is as if in one situation, one atom of the radioactive material decayed leading to the catÕs being dead when observed. Simultaneously, in the other situation, none of the radioactive material decayed, leading to the cat being alive when observed. One situation involves the observer who has not worn the optical device and who is not wearing the device when he or she observes the electron. The other situation involves the observer who is wearing the apparatus when observing the electron and who has adapted to the rotated visual field. In contrast to the Schrdinger cat gedankenexperiment, each observerÕs perception is similar in structure. Butwhile the effect of the rotation of incoming light for a subject is mitigated upon adaptation, the historical physical event of the rotation of the incoming light dueto the optical apparatus remains for the observer wearing the device and acts to distinguish the two situations of the observers. Practically spea king, the ÒrightingÓ of the visual field for the adapted subject means that the electron with spin up in the original spatial structure nowhas spin down in the original spatial structure even though the electron has spin up in the spatial structure of the adapted observer. For the subject wearing the optical apparatus but who has not adapted to the inversion of incoming light, thespatial structure of the world is the same as that for the subject who does not wear the optical apparatus and for whom light is not inverted. The unadapted subject knows that his visual experience is altered by wearing the optical apparatus but that the world itself remains unchanged. The unadapted subject knows that the spin component of the electron is up, that is up for an observer not wearing the optical apparatus, though it appears to be down to him, opposite to the direction found by an observer not wearing the optical apparatus. But with adaptation to inverted incoming light, including the sense of normalcy in visual experience and competency in visually guided action thatCombining Research - 17 -detector detector spin down for O'spin up for O' y axis for O and O' electrons traveling toward Stern-Gerlach apparatusdirection of magnetic field and gradient for O'optical apparatus (z axis for O' in spatial structureof O)Observer O' +x axis for O'(x axis for O' in spatial structure of O)z axis for O' ++ + Observer O', adapted to wearing the optical apparatus, viewing the spin component along the z axis in the spatial structure of O' of electrons traveling through a Stern-Gerlach apparatus with 180 degree rotation of incoming light, in terms of the spatial structure of O, around the y axis. ( x and z axes for O' in spatial structure of O, who does not wear the optical apparatus, are shown.)Figure 33__ __Combining Research - 18 -supports this sense of normalcy, what appears as a spin up component for the electron to the adapted observer is a spin down component when considered in terms of the original spatial structure, the spatial structure of the subject for whom incoming light is not inverted. Unlike the unadapted observer, the adapted observer does not maintain that the world is unchanged while his visual experience has been altered by inverting incoming light with the use of the optical apparatus. The adapted observer experiences the ÒrealÓ direction of the spin component opposite to that experienced by the unadapted observer. In terms of the impact of incoming light on his retina, the adapted observer who observes a spin up component experiences a spin component in the opposite direction to that which the same pattern of light on the retina supports for the unadapted observer (Snyder, 1995). A Possible Objection One might object to this conclusion regarding the ÒrightingÓ of the visual field for the adapted subject in the following way. The artificial reorientation of the incoming light does not prevent tracing back light impacting the retina to thephysical existent that is the source of the light so that the actual spin component of the electron along a particular axis in space and the visual perceptions of the electronÕs spin component in space by the observer for whom light is not inverted, or otherwise rotated, and by the individual adapted to the incoming, altered light are all in agreement. That is, both observers correctly deduce the spin component of the electron because they correctly perceive the motion of theelectron in space along the spatial axis along which it is traveling. Then the visual system could be said to simply adapt to the artificial change in incoming light but that the internal sensory coordination by the observer ultimately reflectsthe absolute positioning of the electronÕs motion in space as it moves through the Stern-Gerlach device. But, consider that instead of using an external optical system to alter the orientation of incoming light, another method is used in the gedanken- experiment to change the orientation of light on the retina. Consider that the retinas of an observer with their supporting physiological structures in the eye, in particular the optic nerve, are rotated 180 o. In this arrangement, an optical apparatus external to the visual system is no longer used. (Both procedures accomplish the same goal, rotation of incoming light 180o on the retina.) The results, though, of using either the external optical system or reorienting the retinas themselves should be the same. The human subject whose retinas have been reoriented should with adaptation see the world upright even though theCombining Research - 19 -incoming light falls on the retinas in the opposite manner to that found for the observer whose retinas have not been reoriented, where space is considered in terms of the spatial structure of this latter observer. By reori enting the retinas themselves, one can no longer reasonably subscribe to the thesis that the visual system is simply accounting for the artificial nature of the external optical apparatus in order to correctly ascertain the absolute positioning of the electronÕs motion in space. Here, no extra instrument is added. Only the orientation of the incoming light relative to the retina has been changed. Summary of the Results of the Gedankenexperiments Psychology can add in a unique way to the exploration of the link between cognition and the physical world found in modern physical theory. Developing an example of an experiment that combines methodology from bothpsychology and physics has provided an interesting result. The gedanken- experiments presented have indicated the importance of an individualÕs spatialstructure in measurement in quantum mechanics. Two fundamental features of quantum mechanics are: 1) quantities represented by non-commuting Hermitian operators cannot be simultaneously known; 2) only one value from a set of mutually exclusive values for a quantity can be known at a time. The gedankenexperiments indicate that both of these features are conditioned by a link between the spatial structure of an observer in the physical world and the orientation of incoming light relative to the observer. An individualÕs spatial structure itself is dependent on variables pertaining to the observer, for example, the correspondence of the haptic, kinesthetic, and visual senses. Within a particular spatial structure, the two fundamental features of quantum mechanics are correct. Yet, when different spatial structures of different observers, or different spatial structures of the same individual who is adapted to wearing the optical apparatus, are compared, it is likely that these features canbe modified. Instead, in these latter circumstances, it is possible that: 1) quantities represented by non-commuting Hermitian operators can be simultaneously known when these quantities are considered in different spatial structures;Combining Research - 20 -2) more than one value for a quantity from a set of what would be in one spatial structure mutually exclusive valuescan be known at a time. The model for developing the gedankenexperiments presented is based on adjusting the observer variables affecting the act of perception. The data obtained in the measurement process concern quantities of the measured physical system, and the expected empirical results are those predicted in quantum mechanics. This model contrasts with most research in quantum mechanics in which the focus is on adjusting variables directly affecting the physical system measured or a physical apparatus directly acting as a measuringinstrument. References Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1929) Brown, G. G. (1928). Perception of depth with disoriented vision. The British Journal of Psychology - General Section , 19, 117-146. Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology , 7, 20-43. Cooper, L. A. (1976). Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation. Perception & Psychophysics , 19, 296-302. Cooper, L. A., and Podgorny, P. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2, 503-514. Cooper, L. A., and Shepard, R. N. (1984). Turning something over in the mind. Scientific American , 251(6), 106-114. Dolezal, H. (1982). Living in a world transformed . New York: Academic Press. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review , 47, 777-780. Eisberg, R., and Resnick, R. (1985). Quantum physics of atoms, molecules, solids, nuclei and particles (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1974) Epstein, P. (1945). The reality problem in quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics , 13, 127-136. Erismann, T., and Kohler, I. (1953). Upright vision through inverting spectacles [Film]. University Park, Pennsylvania: PCR: Films and Video in the Behavioral Sciences. Erismann, T., and Kohler, I. (1958). Living in a reversed world [Film]. University Park, Pennsylvania: PCR: Films and Video in the Behavioral Sciences. Ewert, P. W. (1930). A study of the effect of inverted retinal stimulation upon spatially coordinated behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs: Child Behavior, Animal Behavior, and Comparative Psychology , 7, 177-363.Combining Research - 21 -Feynman, P. R., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M. (1965). The Feynman lectures on physics: Quantum mechanics (Vol. 3). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Georgopoulos, A. P., Lurito, J. T., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A. B., and Massey J. T. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science , 243, 234-236. Gibson, J. J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 16, 1-31. Goswami, A. (1989). The idealistic interpretation of quantum mechanics. Physics Essays , 2, 385-400. Held, R. (1965). Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American , 213(5), 84-94. Held, R., and Freedman, S. J. (1963). Plasticity in human sensorimotor control. Science , 142, 455-462. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., and Jessell, T. M. (1991). Principles of neural science (3rd edition). New York: Elsevier. Kohler, I. (1962). Experiments with goggles. Scientific American , 206(5), 62-72. Kohler, I. (1964). The formation and transformation of the perceptual world (H. Fiss, Trans.). Psychological Issues , 3, 19-133 and 165-173. Liboff, R. (1993). Introductory Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Lurito, J. T., Georgakopoulos, T., and Georgopoulos, A. P. (1991). Cognitive spatial-motor processes: 7. The making of movements at an angle from a stimulus direction: Studies ofmotor cortical activity at the single cell and population levels. Experimental Brain Research , 87, 562-580. Munn, N. L. (1965). The evolution and growth of human behavior (2nd edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published 1955) Pellizzer, G., and Georgopoulos, A. P. (1993). Mental rotation of the intended direction of movement. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 2, 12-17. Pronko, N. H., and Snyder, F. W. (1951). Vision with spatial inversion [Film]. University Park, Pennsylvania: PCR: Films and Video in the Behavioral Sciences. Renninger, M. (1960). Messungen ohne Strung des Me§objekts [Observations without disturbing the object]. Zeitschrift fr Physik , 158, 417-421. Schrdinger, E. (1983). The present situation in quantum mechanics. In J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 152-167) (J. Trimmer, Trans.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1935) Shepard, R. N., and Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science , 171, 701-703. Snyder, D. M. (1986). Light as an expression of mental activity. The Journal of Mind and Behavior , 7, 567-584. Snyder, D. M. (1989). The inclusion in modern physical theory of a link between cognitive- interpretive activity and the structure and course of the physical world. The Journal of Mind and Behavior , 10, 153-172. Snyder, D. M. (1990). On the relation between psychology and physics. The Journal of Mind and Behavior , 11, 1-17.Combining Research - 22 -Snyder, D. M. (1992). Quantum mechanics and the involvement of mind in the physical world: A response to Garrison. The Journal of Mind and Behavior , 13, 247-257. Snyder, D. M. (1993). Quantum mechanics is probabilistic in nature. The Journal of Mind and Behavior , 14, 145-153. Snyder, D. M. (1994). On the arbitrary choice regarding which inertial reference frame is ÒstationaryÓ and which is ÒmovingÓ in the special theory of relativity. Physics Essays , 7, 297-334. Snyder, D. M. (1995). On the quantum mechanical wave function as a link between cognition and the physical world: A role for psychology. The Journal of Mind and Behavior , 16, 151-179. Snyder, F. W., and Pronko, N. H. (1952). Vision with spatial inversion . Witchita, Kansas: University of Witchita Press. Snyder, F. W., and Snyder, C. W. (1957). Vision with spatial inversion: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record , 7, 21-30. Stratton, G. M. (1896). Some preliminary experiments on vision without inversion of the retinal image. The Psychological Review , 3, 611-617. Stratton, G. M. (1897a). Vision without inversion of the retinal image - 1. The Psychological Review , 4, 341-360. Stratton, G. M. (1897b). Vision without inversion of the retinal image - 2. The Psychological Review , 4, 463-481. Stratton, G. M. (1899). The spatial harmony of touch and sight. Mind: A Quarterly Review , 8, 492-505. Wigner, E. (1983). Remarks on the mind-body question. In J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 168-181). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1961)
arXiv:physics/0006043v1 [physics.gen-ph] 19 Jun 2000Do Gravitational and Electromagnetic Fields Have Rest Mass es in the Fractal Universe? L.Ya.Kobelev Department of Physics, Urals State University Av. Lenina, 51, Ekaterinburg 620083, Russia E-mail: leonid.kobelev@usu.ru As well known rest masses of elementary particles and physic al ﬁelds appear when temperature of Universe become low enough and symmetry broke. Are there ano ther sources of rest masses that are consequences of other nature of rest masses or it is the on ly methods for generating rest masses? What will be with massless ﬁelds when the laws of symmetry are not exact laws but only are very good approximation and the time is not homogeneous, as it is i n the fractal world? In this paper based on the fractal theory of time and space (developed by au thor earlier) a possible source of rest masses caused by the fractional dimensions (FD) of the time i s considered. It gives rest masses (very small) for all particles and ﬁelds including gravitational and electromagnetic ﬁelds. The estimation of the values of the rest masses gives mg=/radicalbig ε(tti)−1,mf=/radicalbig (t0ti)−1where tiis the necessary time for photons and gravitons with rest masses mphandmgto get the velocity equal the speed of light (in the fractal Universe the moving with any velocitie s is possible), t0is the time of existence of Universe. Under some assumption preliminary values of re st masses photons and gravitons are obtained: for a rest mass of photons mf∼10−39g, for a rest mass of gravitons mg∼10−43g. 01.30.Tt, 05.45, 64.60.A; 00.89.98.02.90.+p. I. INTRODUCTION The problems of existence rest masses of electromag- netic, gravitational and neutrino ﬁelds are open till now. From one side the experiments can not discover rest masses of these ﬁelds, from other side there is un- explained question why some physical ﬁelds have rest masses, the other ﬁelds not have it.In early years it was wide-spread the opinion that the ﬁelds of the interac- tions (electromagnetic, gravitational an so on) between particles are massless and must not take a charges, but example of the electro-weak interactions by means of vec- tor mesons broke this opinion and interactions of quarks broke the opinions about chargeless of interactions ﬁelds. Thus the situation is: there are the physical ﬁelds with rest masses and there are the physical ﬁelds without rest masses; there are the interactions ﬁelds with charges and without charges. There are the theorems (Goldstone and analogies) about massless boson ﬁelds as consequence of symmetry laws. In the space with the fractal time (see [1]- [15] not all the symmetry laws are fulﬁlled and these theorems work only as a good approach. Only in the case when the fractal dimension of time almost integer the symmetry laws are almost fulﬁll, not exactly, but as a good approach. So the existence in the fractal world rest masses of bosons ﬁeld such as electromagnetic and grav- itational) do not contradicts any theorems true for world with exact symmetry laws and homogeneous time. In this paper shown that in the space with fractal time (dimen- sions of time dt= 1+ε(r, t)/ne}ationslash= 1) in the frame-work of the fractal theory of time and space [1]- [15] all physical ﬁelds have rest masses originated by fractional additives εtointeger time dimension. For the ﬁelds with rest masses in the integer dimensions time these additional masses are non-essential, but it gives the main masses for the mass- less early ﬁelds such as electromagnetic and gravitational ﬁelds. So the symmetry for all physical ﬁelds in respect to rest masses is restored: in fractal Universe all physical ﬁelds have rest masses: some ﬁelds have rest masses orig- inated when temperature of Universe become low enough and symmetry laws is broken, other ﬁelds got rest masses by means of fractional dimensions of time (or space) from the time of beginning of the ”big bang”, when the time and space with fractal dimensions were originated. II. HOW TO DESCRIBE THE FUNCTIONS WITH DEPENDENCIES AT TIME AND COORDINATES IN THE FRACTAL WORLD? As the ﬁrst step of describing the physical functions in the fractal Universe (the world with fractional dimensions of time and space) it is necessary to introduce the deﬁni- tions of fractal time and fractal space (for the purpose of this paper it is enough to introduce only the fractal time) and mathematical methods its describing. Following [1], [2], we will consider both time and space as the initial real material ﬁelds existing in the world and generating all other physical ﬁelds. Therefore, we introduce the in- tegral functionals (both left-sided and right-sided) whic h are suitable to describe the dynamics of functions deﬁned on multifractal sets of time and space (generalized frac- tional derivatives (GFD), see [1]- [2], [3]) and replace by GFD the usual derivatives and integral respect to time 1and space coordinates in the fractional dimensions func- tional. These functionals GFD are simple and natural generalization of the Riemann-Liouville fractional deriv a- tives and integrals: Dd +,tf(t) =/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayt af(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t−t′)d(t′)−n+1(1) Dd −,tf(t) = (−1)n/parenleftbiggd dt/parenrightbiggn/integraldisplayb tf(t′)dt′ Γ(n−d(t′))(t′−t)d(t′)−n+1 (2) where Γ( x) is Euler’s gamma function, and aandbare some constants from [0 ,∞). In these deﬁnitions, as usu- ally,n={d}+ 1 ,where {d}is the integer part of dif d≥0 (i.e. n−1≤d < n ) and n= 0 for d <0. If d=const, the generalized fractional derivatives (GFD) (1)-(2) coincide with the Riemann - Liouville fractional derivatives ( d≥0) or fractional integrals ( d <0). When d=n+ε(t), ε(t)→0, GFD can be represented by means of integer derivatives and integrals.We pay attention that there are relations between GFD and ordinary derivatives fordαnear integer values. If dα→nwhere nis an in- teger number, for example dα= 1 + ε(r¯(t), t),α= r¯, t, in that case it is possible represent GFD by approximate relations (see [1]- [3]) D1+ǫ +,xαf(r¯(t), t) =∂ ∂xαf(r¯(t), t) +∂ ∂xα[ε(r¯(t), t)f(r¯(t), t)] (3) Forn= 1, that is, d= 1 + ε,\|ε\|<<1 it is possible to obtain: D1+ε +,tf(t)≈∂ ∂tf(t) +a∂ ∂t[ε(r(t), t)f(t)] (4) where ais constant and deﬁned by the choice of the rules of regularization of integrals (1)-(2) (for more detailed see [1], [2], [3]). The selection of the rule of regularizati on that gives a real additives for usual derivative in (3) yield a= 0.5 ford <1 [1]. The functions under integral sign in (1)-(2) we consider as the generalized functions deﬁned on the set of the ﬁnite functions [17]. The notions of GFD, similar to (1)-(2), can also be deﬁned and for the space variables r. In the deﬁnitions of GFD (1)-(2) the connections between fractal dimensions of time dt(r(t), t) and main characteristics of physical ﬁelds (say, potential s Φi(r(t), t), i= 1,2, ..) or densities of Lagrangians Li) are determined. Following [1], we deﬁne this connection by the relation dt(r(t), t) = 1 +/summationdisplay iβiLi(Φi(r(t), t)) (5) where Liare densities of energy of physical ﬁelds, βiare dimensional constants with physical dimension of [ Li]−1 (it is worth to choose β′ iin the form β′ i=a−1βifor thesake of independence from regularization constant). The deﬁnition of time as the system of subsets and deﬁnition the FD d(see 4) connects the value of fractional (fractal) dimension dt(r(t), t) with each time instant t. The latter depends both on time tand coordinates r. Ifdt= 1 (an absence of physical ﬁelds) the set of time has topological dimension equal to unity. Thus, in the fractal Universe for changes of any physical functions describing it is necessary to use the GFD in- stead of ordinary derivatives and integrals. Only in the case when corrections to integer dimensions is small (it is the wide-spread case in our world) it is possible replace the GFD by ordinary derivatives using the relations (3). We stress now that GFD Ddt +,ttake into account the inﬂu- ences of the past of the phenomena on the present time state of the phenomena. The GFD Ddt −,ttake into ac- count the inﬂuences of future times on the present time state of the phenomena. So the mathematical methods of GFD deﬁned on the multifractal sets allow to take into account the inﬂuences of past and future on the state of system at the present time. In the fractal world describ- ing by GFD there are no stable phenomena because the diﬀerentiation by means of GFD of constant value do not gives zero. III. THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE IS IN CONTINUAL CHANGING AND EXPANDING The hypotheses of the ”big bang ” as the originate of our Universe gives continual changing and expanding of time and space, but the mathematical methods of or- dinary diﬀerential and integral calculus based on usual mathematical analysis do not give possibility to describe this changing correctly. In particular, thou the time and space are continually expanding (in the frame of GR,) from point of view of ordinary analysis in this expanding world exist constant physical values (for example a vol- ume, an energy and so on). The fractal Universe is an open system (about open systems see [19], [20]) deﬁned on the measure carrier (see [15], [1]- [15]). It is expanding , so all physical values in our world must not be constant. Thou its the changing is very small it has a principle role. The GFD gives such changing of all physical phenomena and values. That changes originate by fractional dimen- sions of time ( and the space) and allow to describe the changing concerned with Universe expanding. Let us see now how to calculate the GRD (1) with respect to tat constant value a0=const. In the fractal world there are no constant values because GFD of constant values do not equal zero D1+ε +,ta0=a0ε t1+εΓ(1 + ε)≈a0ε t1+ε(6) for large t. So if our world has the fractal dimensions any values in this world including the constant values of our world may be expanded in inﬁnite power series in t. The 2GFD Ddt −,tof constant value a0(dt= 1 + ε(r, t),\|ε\|<< 1)is equal Ddt −,ta0≈a0ε B−t(7) In (7) the B-is the upper limit of integral in GFD. The timetin (1) - (2) is the time of existence of Universe. It is useful for symmetry of (6) and (7) to choose Bequal 2t. In that case (though it has no principle sense) the inﬂuence of future on present time is bounded by the time equal the time of existence of Universe. IV. HOW THE FRACTAL DIMENSIONS OF TIME ORIGINATE REST MASSES IN THE MASSLESS FIELD THEORIES ? The corrections given by GFD in case of using it for diﬀerentiation of constant value were considered early . Let us now represent (7) in the form when its main char- acteristics conserves but the derivatives are the ordinary . Thus an any constant value a0in fractal world may be represented as the value with dependence of time t( or coordinates r) a≈a0expε tε(8) In (8) the factor exp(εt−ε) describes the corrections given by the fractal dimensions of time. The ordinary diﬀer- entiation of (8) with respect to tcoincide with result of GFD of awith respect to t. Ifdt= 1 the time dependence in (8) disappears ( ε= 0 ). The (8) may be used for cal- culation of the ordinary derivatives in the theory of the fractal time on base of relation (4) if dt= 1 + ε(r, t) and \|ε\|<<1. In the fractal time and space the equations of all physical ﬁelds must be wrote by means of GFD. For case when FD of time has small fractal corrections to unit these equations may be wrote by means of ordinary derivatives but using (4). Than in the equations with GFD appear the members proportional to ﬁelds that usu- ally describe the rest masses. These members are result of existence of fractal dimensions of time in fractal Uni- verse where the time treats as the real ﬁeld and the ﬁeld of time originate all physical ﬁelds ( see [1] - [4]) includ- ing the rest masses of massless ﬁelds. As the examples of originating the rest masses by GFD the demonstration of appealing rest masses for electromagnetic and gravita- tional ﬁelds will be considered in next paragraph . V. THE REST MASSES OF PHOTONS AND GRAVITONS IN THE UNIVERSE WITH FRACTAL TIME The equations of electromagnetic and gravitational ﬁelds in the fractal Universe if take into account both the corrections giving by FD and modifying SR ( see also [1],[2], [10], [14] , [15]) reads: a) electromagnetic ﬁelds equations [Ddr −,rDdr +r−1 c2Ddt −,tDdt +,t+m2]IAµ(x) = [α14π cjµ(x) + (9) +2a0Ddt −,tDdt +,tα2Aµ(i)], µ= 0,1,2,3 ji=eDdi +,tri, i= 1,2,3 Ddµ +µAµ(x) = 0 (10) b) gravitational ﬁelds equations (the measure carrier is Minkowski time- space) γαβDdi −,αDdi +,βI˜Φµν=α1b2˜Φµν+λ˜tµν(γµν,ΦA) + (11) +2a0γ44Ddt −,tDdt +,tα2˜Φµν In (10) and (11)) α1,α2are Dirac type matrices, Iis unit four column matrix, the function a0has the form a0=ε(r(t), t) =ag+ae+an= =βgLg(r, t) +βeLe(r, t) +βnLn(r, t) (12) where Lg,Le,Lnare Lagrangians density of energies for gravitational, electro-weak and strong ﬁelds, βiis the full energies of the ﬁelds that constructed the Li. We consider now the cases of free electromagnetic and gravitational ﬁelds and neglect by inﬂuences of the ﬁelds with imaginary energies (this inﬂuences gives non- essentials corrections see [15]) and omit the members withm2andb2( which were formal introduced for ful- ﬁllment of the conditions of existence the GFD ). Thus we have [Ddr −,rDdr +r−1 c2Ddt −,tDdt +,t]IAµ(x) = 0 (13) γαβDdi −,αDdi +,βI˜Φµν= 0 (14) Consider the case when electromagnetic or gravitational waves propagate in the space with a0≈constant , i.e in the domain of space that far away from the sources of these ﬁelds. If neglect by the members describing the interactions with the ﬁelds with an imaginary masses and replace the functions Aµand Φµνby the plane waves with frequencies ωwe obtain (using (5)) (1 +a0)∂ ∂tF+∂a0 ∂tF−k2= 0 (15) F= (1 + a0)∂ ∂tAµ+∂a0 ∂tAµ or 3ω2−2i∂a0 ∂tω−(∂2a0 ∂t2+ (∂a0 ∂t)2)−k2c2= 0,(16) Forωobtain w=iγ±/radicalbigg ∂2a0 ∂t2+k2c2γ=∂a0 ∂t(17) So for \|k\|= 0 or k2c2<<∂2a0 ∂t2we read ω0=/radicalbigg ∂2a0 ∂t2+iγ (18) and for∂2a0 ∂t2<<k2c2obtain ω=\|kc\|+ 0.5ω2 0 \|kc\|+iγ (19) Thus it was shown that the massless ﬁelds got the rest masses and these masses deﬁned by the fractal dimen- sions of the time. If the fractal corrections to the fractal dimensions of time are equal zero the rest masses are also equal zero. The value of rest masses depends of the FD of time ( d= 1+ ε(r(t), t)). So the rest masses are functions of time and coordinates included by means of the densi- ties of energies βiLi(r(t), t)) and diﬀers for diﬀerent time and in diﬀerent coordinates. This value and its deriva- tives with respect to tgives the rest masses for case when its velocity is equal zero. In fractal theory of time and space a masses may have any velocities. Now we must take into account this possibility and use the relation for moving particles (see [4]) in modiﬁed SR for multifractal time E=β∗−1E0=E0 4/radicalBig (1−v2 c2)2+ 4a2(20) where a2= (∂ε ∂t)2t2. Thus for the rest masses originated by the fractal dimensions of time for the case when its velocity vequal speed of light v=cobtain ωc=ω0 β∗=/radicalbigg ω2 0 2a(21) The considered theory do not deﬁne the values of pa- rameters tandtiincluded in relations (24)-(25), so any estimations of the values of rest masses of gravitons and photons are preliminary and depends of hypothesis lay- ing in the methods of selection tandti. Nevertheless, as example, consider the order of the rest masses of gravi- tons and photons (neutrinos also have the rest masses originated by FD of time, but it seems that the main part of the rest masses of neutrinos may be explained by ordinary theories). a) gravitons masses Leta0=εandεwith grate accuracy may be treated as constant value. Than∂ε ∂t≈ε2 t(22) and for large t(tis the time of existence of Universe)∂ε ∂talso may be treated as constant value. In this case ∂2ε ∂t2≈ε3 t2(23) and for the rest mass of gravitons mgwe obtain mg≈/radicalbiggε tti¯hc−2(24) Forε∼r0 rwhere r0andrare the gravitational radius of Earth and its radius, t∼1016secandti∼10−34sec(tiis the time needs for graviton to receive the velocity of light) is the time of ”Big Bang” origin, we obtain mg∼10−43g. If diﬀerentiate∂ε ∂twith respect to tthen for estimation ofmgwe receive mg≈/radicalbigg 1 tti¯hc−2(25) andmg∼10−39g. b) The rest masses of photons We may use the same assumptions for estimation the rest masses of photons that have been used for the estimation of the rest masses of gravitons. So we receive the same formula. The estimation of tiwill be the same that for gravitons ( mph∼10−39g). The another selection of ti as the time of emitting of quanta of light ti∼10−12sec. givesmph∼10−50g. We pay attention, as εis in general not constant value, on not necessity the using of 6 or 8 for calculation the derivatives of εwith respect to tif is known the dependence of εatt. VI. THE PROBLEMS OF HIDDEN MASSES OR BLACK MATTER IN THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE As well known, the theories of galaxies moving needs for the value of mass of Universe the value almost in nine times large than the masses observed by astronomers. So, where is the deﬁcit of matter hidden? Is it the masses of interstellar gas substance pressed by gravitational ﬁelds , or is it the black matter of unknown nature? These ques- tions do not have now unambiguously answer. The exis- tence of the rest masses of photons and gravitons allows to include these masses in the possible scenario of the models of hidden and black matter. Really, if the masses of photons and gravitons have the value of order 10−39g it is quite enough for explaining the necessary deﬁcit of masses in the Universe. 4VII. CAN THE BOSE-CONDENSATES OF PHOTONS OR GRAVITONS EXIST IN THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE? Is it possible to imagine the ﬂow of photons or gravi- tons with very small wave numbers and very low temper- ature that satisfy the conditions that are necessary for Bose-condensation? It seems ( if its moving take place in the very strong gravitational or electromagnetic ﬁelds that makes its velocities ( and kinetic energy) very small) because of existence of the rest masses such condensation is not contradicts the physical laws. The really answer now is unknown. VIII. CONCLUSION The main results obtained in this paper are: 1. All physical ﬁelds have rest masses originated by the fractal dimensions of time; 2. The rest masses originated by the FD of time have similar characteristics ( in our approach ) for any mass- less ﬁelds ; 3. The rude estimation of values of rest masses gives satisfactory values for explaining the problem of black matter and hidden masses; 4. The really existence of the rest masses of photons and gravitons makes unnecessary aspiration of the formal in- troduced masses in theories [18], [1]- [15] to zero ; 5. Some questions arise: have rest masses of photons and gravitons unknown charges?; can a charge photons (or a gravitons) interact with each other? What may be answers on these questions and may the theory of open systems [19]- [20] (quantum variants) give these answers? 6. The fractal theory of time and space restore the sym- metry respect rest masses for all physical ﬁelds [1] Kobelev L.Ya. Fractal Theory Time and Space , Ekater- inburg: Konross, 1999, 136p.(in Russian); Fractal Theory Time and Space /Kobelev L.Ya.// Ural State Univ., Eka- terinburg, 1998.-158p.-Bibliogr.51Nam.-Rus.-Dep.v VIN - ITY 22.01.99,189-B99 (in Russian.); [2] Kobelev L.Ya., What Dimensions Do the Time and Space Have: Integer or Fractional? arXiv:physics/0001035; [3] Kobelev L.Ya., Generalized Riemann -Liouville Fractional Derivatives for Multifractal Sets, arXiv:math.CA/0002008,; [4] Kobelev L.Ya. Multifractality of Time and Special Theory of Relativity / Kobelev L.Ya.// Ural State Univ., Ekaterinburg, 1999.-21p.-Bibliogr.14Ref.-Rus.-Dep.v VINITY 19.08.99, 2677-B99.01.99,(in Rus.); Kobelev L.Ya./ Dep. v VINITI. Ekaterinburg. 20.10.99.3128-B99;[5] Kobelev L.Ya., Can a Particle’s Velocity Exceeds the Speed of Light in the Empty Space? arXiv:gr- qc/0001042; [6] Kobelev L.Ya., Physical Consequences of Moving Faster than Light in Empty Space, arXiv:gr-qc /0001043; [7] Kobelev L.Ya. , Multifractality of Time and Space, Co- variant Derivatives and Gauge Invariance,arXiv:hep-th/ 0002005; [8] Kobelev L.Ya., The Multifractal Time and Irreversibili ty in Dynamic Systems, arXiv:physics/0002002; [9] Kobelev L.Ya., Is it Possible to Transfer an Information with the Velocities Exceeding Speed of Light in Empty Space?, arXiv: physics/ 0002003; [10] Kobelev L.Ya., Maxwell Equation, Shroedinger Equa- tion, Dirac Equation, Einstein Equation Deﬁned on the Multifractal Sets of the Time and the Space, arXiv:gr- qc/0002003 [11] Does Special Relativity Have Limits of Applica- bility in the Domain of Very Large Energies?, arXiv:physics/0005069 [12] Kobelev L.Ya. Is the Time a Dimension of an Alien Uni- verse? xxx.arXiv:physycs/0005070 [13] Kobelev L.Ya. Are the Laws of Thermodynamics Consequences of a fractal Properties of Universe? xxx.arXiv:physics/0003036 [14] The Theory of Fractal Time: Field Equations the The- ory of Almost Inertial Systems and Modiﬁed Lorents Transformations),arXive:physics/0005068 [15] Kobelev L.Ya.,The Theory of Gravitation in the Space - Time with Fractal Dimensions and Modiﬁed Lorents transformations,arXiv:gr-qc/00060xx [16] S.G.Samko , A.A.Kilbas , O.I.Marichev, Fractional inte- grals and derivatives - theory and applications (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1993) [17] I.M.Gelfand, G.E.Shilov, Generalized functions (Aca- demic Press, New York, 1964) [18] Logunov A.A., Mestvirichvili M.A.,Theoretical and Mathematical Physics,1997, v.110, p.1-20 (in Russian) [19] Klimontovich Yu.L. Statistical theory of open systems (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995); [20] Klimontovich Yu.L., Statistical theory of open systems 2 ,( Moscow: Yanus,1999, 439p)(in Russian) 5
arXiv:physics/0006044v1 [physics.gen-ph] 19 Jun 2000QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS AFSAR ABBAS Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar-751005, India (e-mail : afsar@iopb.res.in) Abstract Non-locality or entanglement is an experimentally well est ablished prop- erty of quantum mechanics. Here we study the role of quantum e ntanglement for higher symmetry group like SU(3c), the gauge group of quantum chro- modynamics ( QCD ). We show that the hitherto unexplained pro perty of conﬁnement in QCD arises as a fundamental feature of quantum entangle- ment inSU(3c). 1Quantum entanglement, leading to non-locality, is an exper imentally well tested aspect of quantum mechanics [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Startin g with two parti- cles, now four particle entanglement has been demonstrated [7]. Non-local quantum entanglement forms the basis of the concept of quant um informa- tion thereby enabling such phenomena as quantum cryptograp hy [8], dense coding [9], teleportation [9] and quantum computation [10] . The experimental demonstration of quantum entanglement in volves po- larization states of the photons, spin of the electrons and a toms etc. Hence objects within U(1)emand representations of the spin SU(2) group are in- volved. This entanglement necessarily implies non-locali ty. Here we would like to study the property of quantum entanglement for repre sentations of higher group, in particular the group SU(3). Note that the gr oupSU(3c) ( here the subscript c is placed to indicate color degree of fr eedom ) forms the basis of the theory of strong interaction, the Quantum Ch romodynam- ics, While the electrons and photons are immune to QCD, atoms for whom the quantum entanglement and non-locality has also been dem onstrated, are composite systems - consisting of electrons and a nucleus. A nucleus is made up of protons and neutrons whose structure and properties ar e determined by the rules of QCD. An understanding of non-locality in the qua ntum atomic systems would involve an understanding of quantum entangle ment in QCD. In fact viewed in this manner, it becomes a puzzle as to why qua ntum non- locality of elementary systems like the electron and the pho ton is the same as in the composite systems like the atoms. How does the quant um entangle- ment function in the QCD case to make the above possible? One s hould also not forget that after all the protons and the neutrons are the mselves compos- ite systems of quarks and gluons which in turn are governed by QCD. Hence this understanding may have implications for quantum measu rements, quan- tum cryptography, quantum teleportation and quantum compu tation. As a theory of strong interaction QCD is well established bot h theoreti- cally and experimentally. This is well documented in litera ture. ( eg. see ref. [11] ). Herein, the protons and neutrons are made up of three c onstituent quarks and the mesons are made up of a quark-antiquark pair. N ote that the quarks belong to the fundamental representation 3 of SU(3c), the gauge group of QCD. In the colour space 3⊗3⊗3 = 1⊕8⊕8⊕10 (1) 23⊗3 = 1⊕8 (2) The above coupled with the fact that single coloured quark or any other coloured object like a gluon have not been found in nature, ha s led to the hypothesis that colour is permanently conﬁned and that colo ur singlet ob- jects are only found in nature. This so called colour singlet conﬁnement hypothesis is well tested experimentally. Right from the ea rly days of QCD there have been intense eﬀorts to prove the conﬁnement hypot hesis in QCD. There been intriguing hints of conﬁnement in some interpret ations, however as of now there has been no deﬁnitive proof of conﬁnement in QC D. It is widely expected that conﬁnement arises due to some non-pert urbative prop- erty of QCD. But, as to what it is, nobody knows. Hence the prob lem of conﬁnement is still an open one in QCD. When three quarks or a quark-antiquark come together only co lour singlet representations are observed. Hence in the canonical pictu re it is proposed that in the colour space while the singlet has a ﬁnite mass, th e octet, decuptet ( and all other higher representations arising in multiquar k systems ) are inﬁnitely heavy and hence do not contribute to the low energy spectrum. Also the triplet representation ie. the free quark becomes i nﬁnitely heavy when free. Hence the singlets have ﬁnite mass and the coloure d masses are inﬁnitely heavy [11,12]. Thus it has been a long standing puz zle as to how inﬁnitely heavy free objects can come together in a size of 1 f m to give ﬁnite mass bound states. To appreciate the point further, let us go to the hidden colou r concept in the multiquark system. When a neutron and a proton come toget her to form a bound state of deuteron of approximate size of 2 fm, then at t he centre in a region less than a fm or so they should overlap to appear like a six quark bag. As per the colour singlet hypothesis the 6-quark bag loo ks like, \|6q>=1√ 5\|1>\|1>+2√ 5\|8>\|8> (3) where \|1>represents a 3-quark cluster which is singlet in colour spac e and\|8>represents the same as octet in colour space. Hence \|8>\|8>is overall colour singlet. This part is called the hidden colou r because as per conﬁnement ideas of QCD these octets cannot be separated out asymptot- ically and so manifest themselves only within the 6-q colour -singlet system 3[13]. Group theoretically the author had earlier obtained t he hidden colour components in 9- and 12-quark systems [14,15]. The author fo und that the hidden colour component of the 9-q system is 97 .6% while the 12-q system is 99.8% ie. practically all coloured. These 9- and 12-quark conﬁg urations have been found to be relevant in nuclear physics for the A=3, 4 nuclei3H, 3Heand4He. Now the problem is that three inﬁnitely heavy quarks come tog ether to form a ﬁnite mass colour singlet object while at the same ti me forming inﬁnite mass octet and decuptet states. When two such colour singlet objects as in eq. 3 come together both the individual singlet as well a s octet parts contribute. How come 6-q singlet arises due to two ﬁnite mass colour singlets and two inﬁnite mass colour octet objects, both of which cont ribute similar amounts to the total mass of the 6-q system? Similar problems persist for the 9-q and the 12-q systems [14,15]. Note that what we are doing here is identical to the conﬁgurat ion mixing problem in quantum mechanics - in particular nuclear physic s. To determine various properties in nuclear physics one ﬁnds that one has t o mix several states with a particular quantum number to obtain agreement with the ex- periments. The conﬁgurations which mix to give a particular state are all degenerate or very close in energy. It is always found that co nﬁgurations which are separated by large energy gaps do not contribute si gniﬁcantly to to a particular state. In principle one has an inﬁnite dimens ional Hilbert space, however only a ﬁnite number of conﬁgurations are know n to mix to give a state of good quantum number which is physically relev ant. Hence in quantum mechanics if any conﬁgurations are inﬁnite apart in energy then they are inﬁnitely suppressed in the mixed ﬁnal state. There fore it is a puzzle here is as to how the two 3-q states conﬁgurations the singlet and the octet, which are inﬁnite energy apart in energy manage to mix in the 6 -q system. However this is precisely what conﬁnement means for the 6-q s ystem. Now looking back at eqns 1 and 2 we notice that for conﬁnement in th e case of baryons and mesons the same problem of conﬁguration mixing a rises. So how does this come about? Thus the conﬁnement problem should be viewed as a fundamental outstanding problem in quantum mechanics. As shown above, for the ground state hadrons at temperature T =0, the singlet states have ﬁnite energies and the coloured states 3 , 8, 10, 27 etc are all expelled to inﬁnite energies. So far there has been no clu e as to why it is so in QCD, though there have been several model calculations indicating this 4feature [11,12]. Let us now leave the T=0 region and proceed t o some ﬁnite temperature region and study the problem there. Though it ha s never been explicitly demonstrated even in a toy model calculation, th ere is a common feeling that at ﬁnite temperatures too the same inﬁnite sepa ration between the singlet and the coloured objects would persist. Recently we have looked at this speciﬁc problem [16]. We look ed at the role of higher representations like 8-plet, 27-plet etc. fo r large hadronic sys- tems like quark stars and objects created in high energy heav y ion collisions. The orthogonality relation for the associated characters χ(p,q)of the (p,q) multiplet of the group SU(3)cwith the measure function ζ(φ,ψ) is [16] /integraldisplay SUC(3)dφdψζ (φ,ψ)χ⋆ (p,q)(φ,ψ)χ(p′,q′)(φ,ψ) =δpp′δqq′ (4) Let us now introduce the generating function ZGas ZG(T,V,φ,ψ ) =/summationdisplay p,qZ(p,q) d(p,q)χ(p,q)(φ,ψ) (5) with Z(p,q)=tr(p,q)/bracketleftBig exp/parenleftBig −βˆH0/parenrightBig/bracketrightBig (6) Z(p,q)is the canonical partition function. The many-particle-st ates which belong to a given multiplet (p,q) are used in the statistical trace with the free hamiltonian ˆH0, d(p,q) is its dimensionality and βis the inverse of the temperature T. The projected partition function Z(p,q)can be obtained by using the orthogonality relation for the characters. Hen ce the projected partition function for any representation (p,q) is Z(p,q)=d(p,q)/integraldisplay SU(3)cdφdψζ (φ,ψ)χ⋆ (p,q)(φ,ψ)ZG(T,V,φ,ψ ) (7) Once we have the partition function for any representation Z(p, q), then any thermodynamical quantity of interest can be calculated . For example the energy E(p, q)=T2∂ ∂TlnZ(p, q). (8) In ref. [16] we projected out diﬀerent representations like singlet (0,0), octet (1, 1), 27-plet (2, 2) etc. on these large hadrons. The m ost interesting 5result we obtained is that for large values of TV1/3( where V is a measure of the size of the composite object ) all representations ; sing let, octet, 27-plet etc are all degenerate in energy ( ie they all have the same ene rgy ) with the unprojected state. There is nothing which favours the co lour-singlet representation over the colour-octet at high temperatures . At the same time we also found that our projection technique at low temperatu res is able to discriminate between the singlet and the octet states etc by clearly favouring the singlet state over others which are all expelled to inﬁni te energies.. This result is quite general and at high enough temperatures represents the generic property of QCD that all representations have th e same energy [16]. Only as the temperature drops do the singlets ﬁnd thems elves favoured over the other colour states and all the coloured states are e xpelled to inﬁnite energies. What is our singlet state at ﬁnite temperature? It is degener ate in en- ergy with respect to all coloured states. This colour single t is made from conﬁgurations like 1 ⊗1, 8⊗8, 27⊗27 etc, that is, all permitted coloured states which can come together to give a singlet. Note that in the said paper [16] we had looked at the chemical potential zero state. We ha ve found that the same holds for non-zero chemical potential as well. Sinc e all these have the same energy, as per the conﬁguration mixing idea in quant um mechan- ics, at ﬁnite temperature there is nothing barring them from contributing to the colour singlet object. How this signiﬁcant eﬀect at ﬁnit e temperature manifests itself at T=0 is what we shall discuss below. As per the standard picture of cosmology the Universe was muc h hotter at early times. Hence at high enough temperature in the Early Universe as per our calculation in QCD [16], all the coloured states must have existed and were degenerate with the colour singlet states. Being degen erate in energy all kind of conﬁguration mixing giving a particular quantum sta tes were allowed quantum mechanically. Hence, the 6-q state as given by eq. 3 w as a quantum mechanically permitted conﬁguration mixed state.In this p articular case in the Early Universe clearly the mixing conﬁgurations were th e singlet and the octet. It was at this stage in the Early Universe that the t wo states, \|1>with another \|1>and\|8>with another \|8>got entangled quantum mechanically. Similar things happened for all other possib le states. Hence a 3-q colour singlet state was an entangled state of three diﬀe rent\|3>coloured states at that temperature. And so on. As the Universe cooled as shown by us [16], the colour singlet states would 6come down in energy while the coloured states would be expell ed to inﬁnite energies. And this happens to be the physical situation at pr esent. Hence today when the \|6−q >state has components \|1>\|1>and\|8>\|8>, it is because the system remembers that it was entangled in th is manner in the Early Universe. It is a manifestation of quantum entangl ement of these states in the Early Universe which manifests itself as conﬁn ement in QCD at present. We can argue in the same manner for all possible co lour singlet states available at present. Hence we propose here that conﬁ nement in QCD at present arises as a result of quantum entanglement in SU(3c) at ﬁnite temperature in the Early Universe. Note that quantum entanglement in the case of the spin proper ties of electrons and photon manifests itself as non-locality. In t he case of QCD, as shown here, quantum entanglement appears as the local col our conﬁne- ment. It is quantum correlation which is important. Non-loc ality or locality depends upon the quantum property under consideration, Note that the signiﬁcant eﬀect of the quantum entanglement i n QCD leading to conﬁnement is that this is a local eﬀect, meaning t hat it is ensures that QCD entanglement acts only within a distance of a fermi f or a nucleon and a few fermis for a nucleus. This ensures that whether you u se an electron ( or a photon ) beam, the quantum entanglement eﬀects as studi ed in the two slit experiments or the EPR kind of experiments, the eﬀec t would be the same if you used an atomic beam instead. Had the quantum entan glement eﬀect in QCD been any diﬀerent than to give conﬁnement in a ﬁni te size, the eﬀects for the Universe today would have been unimaginab ly diﬀerent! Actually this fact should be seen as experimental conﬁrmati on of the ideas presented here. In summary, we emphasize our recent result in the study of QCD at ﬁnite temperature, that all states - coloured as well as singlet ar e degenerate at ﬁnite temperatures [16]. This allows for all kind of quantum conﬁguration mixing giving a particular state in the Early Universe. Henc e these conﬁg- urations get quantum mechanically entangled. As the Univer se cooled to reach the present status of ﬁnite mass colour singlet states and inﬁnite mass coloured states, the colour singlet states remember as to ho w they were made up of which coloured entangled states when the Universe was h ot. And con- tinues to behave that way at present. Hence conﬁnement in QCD at present, arises as a result of quantum entanglement in QCD at ﬁnite tem perature in the Early Universe. 7References 1. J F Clauser and A Shimony, Rep Prog Phys 41(1978) 1881 2. A Aspect, P Grangier and G Roger, Phys Rev Lett 49(1982) 91 3. W Tittel, J Brendel, H Zbinden and N Gisin, Phys Rev Lett 81( 1998) 3563 4. G Weihs, T Jennewein, C Sunon, H Weinfurter and A Zeilinger , Phys Rev Lett 81( 1998) 5039 5. P G Kwiat, E Waks, A G White, I Appelbaum and P H Eberhard, Phys Rev A 60 ( 1999) R773 6. S Duerr, T Nonn and G Rempe, Nature 395(1998) 23 7. C A Sackett, D Kielpinski, B E King, C Langer, V Meyer, C J Mya tt, M Rowe, Q A Turchette, W M Itano, D J Wineleand and C Monroe, Nat ure 404(2000) 256 8. A K Ekert, Phys Rev Lett 69(1992) 1293 9. C Bennett et al, Phys Rev Lett 70(1993) 1895 10. Ed.- D DiVencenzo, E Knill, R LaFamme and W Zurek, Proc R So c Lon Ser A 1969 (1998) 11. R E Marshak, ” Conceptual foundations of modern particle physics”, World Scientiﬁc Pub Ltd ( Singapore ) 1993 12. C Bender, Phys Rep 75(1981) 205 13. V A Matveev and P Sorba, Lett Nuovo Cim 20(1977) 435 14. Afsar Abbas, Phys Lett B 167 (1986) 150 15. Afsar Abbas, Prog Part Nucl Phys 20(1988) 181 16. Afsar Abbas,Lina Paria and Samar Abbas, Eur Phys J C 14(2000)695 Journal electronic version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s100520000395 8
arXiv:physics/0006045v1 [physics.bio-ph] 19 Jun 2000LU TP 00-07 SLAC-PUB-8429 April 13, 2000 A Novel Approach to Structure Alignment Mattias Ohlsson, Carsten Peterson, Markus Ringn´ er1 Complex Systems Division, Department of Theoretical Physi cs University of Lund, S¨ olvegatan 14A, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden http://www.thep.lu.se/complex/ Richard Blankenbecler2 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center P.O. Box 4349, Stanford, CA 94309, USA Submitted to Structure with Folding & Design Running Head : Structure Alignment of Proteins Keywords : protein structure alignment; permutation; mean ﬁeld anne aling; fuzzy assign- ment; database searching 1{mattias,carsten,markus }@thep.lu.se 2rzbth@slac.stanford.eduAbstract Background: Aligning protein structures is a highly relevant task. It en ables the study of functional and ancestry relationships between pro teins and is very important for homology and threading methods in structure prediction . Existing methods typically only partially explore the space of possible alignments and being able to eﬃciently handle permutations eﬃciently is rare. Results: A novel approach for structure alignment is presented, wher e the key ingre- dients are: (1) An error function formulation of the problem simultaneously in terms of binary (Potts) assignment variables and real-valued atomi c coordinates. (2) Minimiza- tion of the error function by an iterative method, where in ea ch iteration a mean ﬁeld method is employed for the assignment variables and exact ro tation/translation of atomic coordinates is performed, weighted with the corresponding assignment variables. The approach allows for extensive search of all possible alignm ents, including those involving arbitrary permutations. The algorithm is implemented usin g aCα-representation of the backbone and explored on diﬀerent protein structure catego ries using the Protein Data Bank ( Pdb) and is successfully compared with other algorithms. Conclusions: The approach performs very well with modest CPU consumption and is robust with respect to choice of parameters. It is extreme ly generic and ﬂexible and can handle additional user-prescribed constraints easily . Furthermore, it allows for a probabilistic interpretation of the results. 2Introduction Aligning protein structures is a subject of utmost relevanc e. It enables the study of func- tional relationship between proteins and is very important for homology and threading methods in structure prediction. Furthermore, by grouping protein structures into fold families and subsequent tree reconstruction, ancestry and evolutionary issues may get unraveled. Structure alignment amounts to matching two 3D structures s uch that potential common substructures, e.g. α-helices, have priority. The latter is accomplished by allo wing for gaps in either of the chains. Also, the possibility of permut ing sites within a chain may be beneﬁcial. At ﬁrst sight, the problem may appear very s imilar to sequence alignment, as manifested in some of the vocabulary (gap cost s etc.). However, from an algorithmic standpoint there is a major diﬀerence. Whereas sequence alignment can be solved within polynomial time using dynamical programming methods [1], this is not the case for structure alignment since rigid bodies are to be mat ched. Hence, for all structure alignment algorithms the scope is limited to high quality ap proximate solutions. Existing methods for structure alignment fall into two broa d classes, depending upon whether one (1) directly minimizes the inter-atomic distances between two structures or (2) minimizes the distance between substructures that are e ither preselected or supplied by an algorithm involving intra-atomic distances. One approach within the ﬁrst category is the iterative dynam ical programming method [2, 3], where one ﬁrst computes a distance matrix between all pairs of atoms (e.g. Cα) forming a similarity matrix, which by dynamical programmin g methods gives rise to an assignment matrix mimicking the sequence alignment proced ure. One of the chains is then moved towards the other by minimizing the distance betw een assigned pairs. This method does not allow for permutations. Another inter-atom ic approach is pursued in [4], where the area rather than distances between two stru ctures is minimized. In [5] the approach is diﬀerent. Here one compares distance m atrices within each of the two structures to be aligned, which provide information about similar substructures. The latter are subsequently matched. A similar framework is used in [6] and also in [7]. Not surprisingly, in [5, 6] and [7] permutations can in princ iple be dealt with. There are implementation issues shared by both methodologi es above. One is structure encoding ( Cαand/or Cβof the chains). For many comparisons Cαappears to be suﬃ- cient, whereas in some cases Cβis needed. Also, the choice of distance metric is a subject of concern in order to avoid the inﬂuence of outliers. The iterative dynamical programming method [3] has been ext ensively assessed for back- 1bone structures [8] from the Scop [9] database, in which protein structures have been classiﬁed by visual inspection. Some comparisons with Scop have also been performed [10] using the method in [6]. Here we present a novel approach, which shares some of its phi losophy from the iterative dynamical programming method [3]. Its key ingredients are: (A) An error function for- mulation of the problem simultaneously in terms of binary (P otts) assignment variables and real-valued atomic coordinates and (B) minimization of the error function by an iterative method, where each iteration contains two steps: 1. A mean ﬁeld procedure for minimizing with respect to the as signment variables. 2. Exact rotation and translation of atomic coordinates wei ghted with the correspond- ing assignment variables. The approach, which is very general, has some very appealing properties: •Implicit complete exploration of the entire space of alignm ents, which allows for arbitrary permutations. To our knowledge, no other approac h has this feature. •Probabilistic interpretation of the results. This feature is present without tedious Monte Carlo estimates since the algorithm is deterministic . Among other things, this implies that the approach is less sensitive to the choic e of distance metric, since the distances are weighted with fuzzy numbers. •With its generality, almost arbitrary additional constrai nts are easily incorporated into the formalism including diﬀerent functional forms of g ap penalties. The approach is tested using Cα-representation of backbones, by comparing the results with the approaches of [3] and [5] as implemented in the Yale Alignment Server and Dali respectively and in one instance also with [6] ( Entrez ). In choosing protein pairs to align we followed [8] to a large extent. In [8] pairs with ma rginal sequence overlap but where each protein in a pair belongs to the same Scop superfamily and therefore have a similar structure were picked for assessment. We selected pairs from a varied selection of the families used in [8] to test our algorithm: •Dihydrofolate Reductases (α/β) •Globins (all-α) •Plastocyanin/azurin (all-β) •Immunoglobulins (all-β) In addition, we test the permutation capacity of our approac h, by aligning: 2•Permuted proteins (winged helix fold) When assessing the algorithm, we limit ourselves to a core ve rsion, where Cβdegrees of freedom are not included. Also, no post-processing of the results is done. We defer such elaborations and others to forthcoming publication. N evertheless, the core version of our approach is already very competitive even for chains, where permutations are not needed. For the latter case, the other algorithms could n ot be tested using the corresponding WWW-servers. In the instances, where we have tested it for this kind of problems, it also performs well. The algorithm is implemented in C++. Given its generality and power, the CPU demand is quite modest – it scales like the chain lengths squared and on the average requires a few seconds on a Pentium 400MHz PC. Methods The Algorithm In what follows we have two proteins with N1andN2atoms to be structurally aligned. This is accomplished by a series of weighted rigid body trans formations of the ﬁrst chain, keeping the second chain ﬁxed. We denote by xi(i= 1, ..., N 1) andyj(j= 1, ..., N 2) the atom coordinates of the ﬁrst and second chain, respectively . The phrase ”atom” will be used throughout this paper in a generic sense – it could repre sent individual atoms but also groups of atoms. In our applications it will mean Cα-atoms along the backbone. A square distance metric between the chain atoms is used, d2 ij=\|xi−yj\|2(1) but the formalism is not conﬁned to this choice. We start by discussing the encodings and error function and t hen we present a method for minimizing the latter. The Gapless Case. For pedagogical reasons, we start oﬀ with the gapless case wi th N1=N2. We deﬁne binary assignment variables sijsuch that sij= 1 if atom iin one chain matches jin the other and sij= 0 otherwise. Since every atom in one chain must match one atom in the other, the following conditions must be fulﬁlled: N1/summationdisplay i=1sij= 1 j= 1, . . ., N 2 (2) 3N2/summationdisplay j=1sij= 1 i= 1, . . ., N 1 (3) A suitable error function to minimize subject to the above co nstraints (Eqs. (2,3)) is Echain=N1/summationdisplay i=1N2/summationdisplay j=1sijd2 ij (4) where the spatial degrees of freedom, xi, are contained in the distance matrix d2 ij. Thus whenever sij=1 one adds a penalty d2 ijtoEchain. Note that Eq. (4) is to be minimized both with respect to the binary variables sijand the real-valued coordinates xi. The Gapped Case. Allowing for gaps in either of the chains is implemented by ex tend- ingsijto include 0-components in a compact way; si0= 1 and s0j= 1 if an atom ( iorj) in one chain is matched with a gap in the other and vice versa. H ence, gap positions are not represented by individual elements in sij; rather the gap-elements correspond to common sinks. The matrix S, with elements sij, containing gap-elements is shown in Eq. (5). S= s01s02... s 0N2 s10s11s12... s 1N2 s20s21s22... s 2N2 . . . sN10sN11sN12.... s N1N2 (5) Some caution is needed when generalizing Eqs. (2,3) to host g aps, since the elements of the ﬁrst row and column (gap-mappings containing the index 0 ) in Eq. (5) diﬀer from the others in that they need not sum up to 1. Hence Eqs. (2,3) be comes N1/summationdisplay i=0sij= 1; j= 1, . . ., N 2 N2/summationdisplay j=0sij= 1; i= 1, . . ., N 1 (6) where the ﬁrst condition can be rewritten as N1/summationdisplay i=1sij= 1 orN1/summationdisplay i=1sij= 0; j= 1, . . ., N 2 (7) The encoding ( sij) of matches and gaps is illustrated in Fig. 1 with a simple exa mple. 4ijS  0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1  Figure 1: A simple example of the assignment matrix S(right) corresponding to the matching of the two toy chains (left). Assuming a constant penalty per inserted gap one has the erro r function E=Echain+N1/summationdisplay i=1λ(1) isi0+N2/summationdisplay j=1λ(2) js0j (8) where λ(1) iis the cost for matching atom iin the ﬁrst chain with a gap in the second chain, and similarly for λ(2) j. The position dependence of the gap costs, λ(1) iandλ(2) j, originates from the fact that it is desirable not to break α-helix and β-strand structures. In Eq. (8) the gap penalties are proportional to gap lengths. In sequence alignment it is conjectured that gap penalties consist of two parts; a pen alty for opening a gap and then a penalty proportional to the gap length. As in [3], we wi ll for structure alignment here adopt the same gap cost philosophy, i.e. λ(1) iandλ(2) jfor opening a gap and a position-independent δper consecutive gap. Hence, Eq. (8) generalizes to E=Echain+N1/summationdisplay i=1λ(1) isi0+N2/summationdisplay j=1λ(2) js0j +N1/summationdisplay i=2/parenleftig δ−λ(1) i/parenrightig si−1,0si0+N2/summationdisplay j=2/parenleftig δ−λ(2) j/parenrightig s0,j−1s0j (9) where products like si−1,0si0are 1 if two adjacent atoms are matched to gaps. Minimization. Next we need an eﬃcient procedure for minimizing Ewith respect to both sijandxisubject to the constraints in Eqs. (6,7). As mentioned above , this minimization problem is non-trivial due to the rigid body co nstraint. A similar problem in terms of ﬁtting structures with relevance factors was pro bed in [11] for track ﬁnding problems with a template approach using the mean ﬁeld approx imation. Here we will adopt a similar approach. 5In our formulation, the inherent optimization diﬃculty res ides in the binary part ( sij) of the problem. Hence, minimizing Eq. (9) using a simple upda ting rule for sijwill very likely yield poor solutions due to local minima. Well known s tochastic procedures such as simulated annealing ( SA) [12] for avoiding this are too costly from a computational standpoint. In the mean ﬁeld (MF) approach [13], the philosophy behind SA is retained, but the tedious simulations are replaced by an eﬃcient deter ministic process. The bi- nary variables sijare then replaced by continuous mean ﬁeld variables vij∈[0,1], with a dynamics given by iteratively solving the MF equations for a decreasing set of temper- atures Tdown to T0, where most of the vijapproach either 1 or 0. These continuous MF variables can evolve in a space not accessible to the origina l intermediate variables. The intermediate conﬁgurations at non-zero Thave a natural probabilistic interpretation. Forsijsatisfying Eq. (6), the MF equations for the corresponding vijread vij=euij/T N2/summationdisplay k=0euik/T;i= 1, ..., N 1 (10) where the force uijis given by uij=−∂E ∂vij(11) and is computed by substituting sijwithvijinE(Eq. (9)). Note that the desired normalization condition, Eq. (6), N2/summationdisplay j=0vij= 1; i= 1, ..., N 1 (12) is fulﬁlled automatically in Eq. (10). The other condition ( Eq.(7)) is enforced by adding a penalty term Eγ=γN2/summationdisplay j=1[(N1/summationdisplay i=1vij)(N1/summationdisplay k=1vkj−1)] =γN1/summationdisplay i=1N1/summationdisplay k/ne}ationslash=iN2/summationdisplay j=1vijvkj (13) where γis a parameter and the last equality follows from the fact tha tv2 ij=vijforT=0. So far we have only looked at the assignment part when minimiz ing the error function. When updating the mean ﬁeld variables vij, using the MF equations, the distance mea- sured2 ijis a ﬁxed quantity. This corresponds to having the chains at ﬁ xed positions. However, we also want to minimize the distance between the tw o chains. Based on the probabilistic nature of the mean ﬁeld variables we propose to update the cha in positions 6using the (fuzzy) assignment matrix V, with elements vij. This is done simultaneously with the updating of vij. Explicitly, one of the chains will be moved in order to minim ize the chain error function Echain(Eq. (4)). The distance measure d2 ijdepends on the translation vector aand the rotation matrix R, making a total of six independent variables. Let x′ ibe the coordinates of the translated and rotated protein, i.e. x′ i=a+Rxi, then Echain=N1/summationdisplay i=1N2/summationdisplay j=1vij(a+Rxi−yj)2(14) This minimization problem can be solved exactly with closed -form expressions for Rand athat minimizes Echain[14]. It should be noted that this solution is rotationally i nvariant (independent of R) for the special case when the atoms in the two chains matches each other with the same weight, i.e. when vij= constant for all iandj, which is the case for high T. In summary, for a decreasing set of temperatures T, one iterates until convergence: 1. The MF equations (Eq. (10)). 2. Exact translation and rotation of the chain (Eq. (14)). We stress again that step 2 is done with the fuzzy MF assignmen t variables vijand not with the binary ones, sij. After convergence, vijare rounded oﬀ to 0 or 1 and rms(root- mean-square-distance) is computed for the matching pairs. Algorithmic details can be found in the next subsection. The forces uijentering Eq. (10) are proportional to d2 ij(Eqs. (4,11)). It is the ratio d2 ij/T that counts. Hence, for large temperatures T,vijare fairly insensitive to dijand many potential matching pairs ( i, j) contribute fairly evenly. As the temperature is decreased , a few pairs (the ones with small dij) are singled out and ﬁnally at the lowest Tonly one winner remains. One can view the situation as that around each atom ione has a Gaussian domain of attraction, which initially (large T) has a large width, but gradually shrinks to a small ﬁnite value. The fuzziness of the approach is illustrated in Fig. 2, where the evolution of vij, asTis lowered, is shown for parts of the ﬁrst helices of 1ECD and1MBD (see next section) together with snap-shots of the corresponding chain sectio ns. At high Tallvijare similar; all potential matches have equal probability. At lower T, several vijhave approached 0 or 1 and the movable chain is moving in the right direction. A t yet lower T, note that a few vijconverge later than the majority. These are in this example r elated to the matching of the last atom in one of the chains. This atom has tw o potential candidates to match resulting in a number of vijthat converge last. 7/B4/CP/B5 /B4/CQ/B5/B4 /B5 /B4/CS/B500.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ00.20.40.60.81 05101520253035404550vij τ Figure 2: Illustration of the fuzziness of the approach. The alignment shown is for 10 atoms in the ﬁrst helices in the proteins 1ECD (blue) and 1MBD (red). (a)Evolution of all the 120 vijas a function of iteration time τ(Tis lowered with τ).(b)Positions of the atoms at τ= 1. For high Tevery atom in a protein feels all the atoms in the other protein and the prob lem is rotationally invariant. (c)τ= 12; most of the relevant matchings are forcing the system to move in the right direction. (d)τ= 50; the ﬁnal assignments are done. The diﬀerent snapshots are prese nted using diﬀerent projections. Some vij approach 0 or 1 rather late and they are coloured green. These vijare related to the atom at the end of the1MBD segment, which also is coloured green, and as can be seen in (c)the diﬃculty is whether to align this atom to the last or second last atom in the 1ECD segment. Implementation Here we give a very condensed, but yet self-contained and det ailed description of the algorithm and the parameters involved, such that the result s of this paper are repro- ducible. 8Parameters. Two kind of parameters are used; the ones related to encoding of the problem ( γ) and iteration dynamics ( ǫ), where ǫgoverns the annealing schedule (see below), and the ones specifying gap costs ( λ,δ). The same set of parameters can be used for most of the pairs (see Table 1); the algorithm is rema rkably stable. Protein Family ǫ γ λ λ sheet λhelix δ α/β, all-α 0.8 0.065 0.10 1 .5λ1.5λ λ/ 2 Plastocyanin/azurin 0.8 0.035 0.10 2 .0λ2.0λ λ/ 5 Immunoglobulins 0.8 0.040 0.15 2 .0λ2.0λ λ/ 5 Winged helix fold 0.8 0.070 0.20 2 .0λ2.0λ λ/ 5 Table 1: Parameters used in the algorithm. The ﬁrst family in volves 27 pairs, whereas the others one each. Initialization. An initialization of the chains is made prior to the mean ﬁeld alignment. First both chains are moved to their common center of mass. Fo r therandom initializa- tion, this move is then followed by a random rotation of one of the chains. Most of the times, however, a sequential initialization is used that consists of minimizing Eq. (4) u s- ing a band-diagonal assignment matrix S. This corresponds to a situation where, on the average, atom iin one of the chains is matched to atom iin the other. If not explicitly mentioned, sequential initialization is used for all the pr otein pairs in this paper. Iteration Steps. The shortest chain is always chosen as the one that is moved ( xi). The mean ﬁeld variables vijare updated according to Eq. (10) where, in order to improve convergence, the derivatives in Eq. (11) are replaced by ﬁni te diﬀerences (see e.g. [15]). This update equation accounts for all mean ﬁeld variables ex cept for the ﬁrst row of V, which is updated according to v0j= 1−N1/summationdisplay i=1vij;j= 1, ..., N 2 (15) The algorithmic steps are shown in Fig. 3. After convergence , no post processing is applied for the results in the next section. Results To test the quality of our alignment algorithm, we have compa red alignments of protein pairs with results from other automatic procedures. For mos t of the tested pairs, each protein belongs to the same Scop superfamily. The goal here is not a full investigation of all families but rather to explore a limited set with repre sentative variation. Pairs were picked from a selection of the families investigated in [8]. Our choice of pairs is essentially 91. Initialization. 2. Rescale coordinates such that the largest distance betwe en atoms within the chains is unity. 3. Initiate all vijclose to 1 /max(N1, N2) (randomly). 4. Initiate the temperature (e.g. T= 2). 5. Randomly (without replacement) select one row, say row k. 6. Update all vkj, j= 0, ..., N 2according to Eq. (10). 7. Repeat items 5 −6N1times (such that all rows have been updated once). 8. Repeat items 5 −7 until no changes occur (deﬁned e.g. by 1 /(N1N2)/summationtext ij\|vij−v(old) ij\| ≤0.0001). 9. Rotation and translation of the shortest chain using the f uzzy assignment matrix V. 10. Decrease the temperature, T→ǫT. 11. Repeat items 5 −10 until all vijare close to 1 or 0 (deﬁned e.g. by 1 /N1/summationtext ijv2 ij≥0.99). 12. Finally, the mean ﬁeld solution is given by the integer li mit of vij, i.e. for each row i,i= 1, ..., N 1select the column j∗such that vij∗is the largest element for this row. Let sij∗= 1 and all other sij= 0 for this row. Figure 3: Algorithmic steps. based on two criteria. First, the pairs should have diverse s tructures, and in particular include all- α, all-β, and α/βproteins. Second, in [8] some families are considered to be very easy ,easyanddiﬃcult to align, respectively, and we included pairs from all these categories. In addition we have tested the algorithm on case s where permutations are needed. Our results are compared with the Yale Alignment Server (http://bioinfo.mbb.yale. edu/align/) and Dali (http://www2.ebi.ac.uk/dali/). The Yale server applies post processing to its alignments by removing aligned pairs with too large root-mean-square- distance ( rms) in an iterative manner subject to a termination criteria. A similar proce- dure is of course possible in our approach, but we have chosen at this stage to keep the algorithm clean. In the comparisons below we have for the Yale server quoted results both before and after the post-processing. Unless otherwise stated, proteins are in what follows denot ed by their Pdb[16] identiﬁer, and in the case of chains or parts of chains with their Scop domain label. A summary of the results in terms of rmsand the number of aligned atoms ( N) is shown in Table 2 100.51.52.53.54.5 80100120140160180rms Number of aligned atoms ( N)DALI YALE LUND Figure 4: rmsandNcorresponding to Table 2. The Yale data correspond to no post processing (see text). and in Fig. 4. Detailed comments upon these results and some a dditional ones can be found below. With regard to the general performance one must keep in mind t hat it is not straight- forward to assess alignment algorithms in terms of e.g. rmsandN, since there are no obvious ﬁgure-of-merits. It is interesting to notice thoug h that when inspecting aligned core regions in detail, we are close to the Yale alignments but in general with a lower rms. However, in such comparisons, we diﬀer more from Dali. The Yale algorithm has been subject to comparison with Scop classiﬁcations using a multiple alignment procedure [8], giving its and our alignments a higher credib ility. Dihydrofolate Reductases (α/β). These proteins belong to the Scop classα/β, which contains α- and β-proteins that have mainly parallel beta sheets. They are co nsidered very easy to align [8]. If we compare alignments of core struc ture parts using the three methods we ﬁnd that they all essentially agree. However, one notes that the Yale results are very sensitive to the post processing. Globins (all-α). In the all- αScop class we particularly study a set of globin proteins. In general, we get lower rmsthan the other algorithms for the same number of aligned residues. When comparing alignments from the three algorit hms we ﬁnd that an im- portant aspect of our algorithm is manifested – allowing for permutation of individual atoms. The reason for this is that to optimally align seconda ry structures it is often beneﬁcial to have a few permuted residues in loops between th e secondary structures. 11Protein family Protein Pair Yale Dali Lund rms N rms N rms N Dihydrofolate 1DHFa -8DFR 1.7 (0.7) 182 (182) 0.7 182 0.7 182 Reductases 1DHFa -4DFRa 2.7 (1.2) 155 (130) 2.0 155 1.9 154 1DHFa -3DFR 2.5 (1.2) 159 (143) 1.7 158 1.7 159 8DFR -4DFRa 2.8 (1.3) 156 (131) 2.1 151 1.9 154 8DFR -3DFR 2.6 (1.3) 160 (146) 2.0 160 1.7 160 4DFRa -3DFR 2.4 (1.1) 157 (140) 1.5 152 1.5 153 Globins 2HHBa -2HHBb 2.3 (1.2 ) 139 (129) 1.5 139 1.4 139 2HHBa -2LHB 2.7 (1.6) 131 (123) 1.8 128 1.9 130 2HHBa -1MBD 2.4 (1.5) 141 (138) 1.5 139 1.5 141 2HHBa -2HBG 2.4 (0.8) 138 (105) 1.7 138 1.6 137 2HHBa -1MBA 2.9 (2.2) 138 (134) 2.3 136 2.2 138 2HHBa -1ECD 3.1 (2.2) 130 (126) 2.3 129 2.2 130 2HHBb -2LHB 2.5 (1.3) 136 (126) 1.7 134 1.6 134 2HHBb -1MBD 2.3 (1.4) 145 (138) 1.6 145 1.4 143 2HHBb -2HBG 2.4 (1.4) 136 (125) 2.0 135 1.6 133 2HHBb -1MBA 3.0 (2.2) 140 (137) 2.3 138 2.2 139 2HHBb -1ECD 2.8 (2.2) 136 (134) 2.3 129 2.1 134 2LHB -1MBD 2.4 (1.0) 137 (121) 1.4 135 1.4 136 2LHB -2HBG 2.7 (1.5) 131 (119) 2.0 128 2.1 130 2LHB -1MBA 2.7 (1.8) 138 (130) 1.9 135 1.9 132 2LHB -1ECD 2.7 (1.9) 130 (127) 2.0 128 1.9 128 1MBD -2HBG 2.5 (1.6) 139 (130) 2.1 139 1.8 137 1MBD -1MBA 2.5 (1.7) 143 (137) 1.9 142 1.8 142 1MBD -1ECD 2.2 (1.6) 136 (134) 1.9 136 1.6 136 2HBG -1MBA 2.9 (2.2) 139 (136) 2.4 137 2.2 135 2HBG -1ECD 3.3 (2.5) 128 (125) 2.6 129 2.4 125 1MBA -1ECD 2.8 (1.7) 134 (125) 1.9 133 1.9 135 Plastocyanin/azurin 1PLC -1AZU 4.7 (2.9) 91 (85) 2.6 86 2.1 78 Immunoglobulins 7FABl2 -1REIa 3.5 (2.6) 83 (79) 2.6 78 3.0 89 Table 2: The root-mean-square-distance ( rms) and the number of aligned residues ( N) from the align- ment of diﬀerent protein pairs. The results are presented fo r several automatic alignment procedures; Lund refers to this work. For Yale the numbers within parenthesis refer to after post processi ng (see text). If we again compare the core parts of the alignments from the t hree algorithms we ﬁnd that they agree on a large fraction of the parts. Plastocyanin/azurin (all-β). All- βproteins are diﬃcult to align if one only takes backbone coordinates ( CαorCβ) into account, even though using Cβinstead of Cα coordinates, in general, improves the results. As an initia l example of all- βproteins we have looked at plastocyanin versus azurin. Even though this alignment is slightly more diﬃcult than the previous cases, all three methods give simi larrmsandNand they all agree on the alignment of a majority of the core parts. For thi s example several restarts 12were performed with random initialization. Immunoglobulins (all-β). A more diﬃcult example of all- βproteins is immunoglob- ulins. We align the domain 7FABl2 with the chain 1REIa and ﬁnd that we can ﬁnd alignments with low rmsthat look good. However, if we investigate the alignment in detail we ﬁnd that atoms in all core regions, except one, are m isaligned. This is also the case in [8], where the same alignment is investigated. To get the core regions correctly aligned in [8] they improve their method and take side chain o rientation into account. We expect that this is the case for our method too. When aligni ng strands using only Cαcoordinates, strands in the two proteins are often matched s atisfyingly to one an- other while the individual atoms are aligned such that one st rand is translated with respect to the other. It is therefore obvious that side chain orientation is very important when aligning strands. For this example several restarts we re performed with random initialization. Permuted proteins – winged helix fold . Finally we look at permuted versions of similar folds. We compare two DNA binding domains related to transcription regulation. The compared domains both have the winged helix fold but one o f them has the secondary structures in a circularly permuted order. This is a case whe re iterative dynamical programming algorithms will fail. We look at 1LEA and compare it to the Entrez- Mmdb [17] structural domain 4 in chain B of 1XGN . This part of 1XGN is classiﬁed as a circularly permuted winged helix fold in Scop. In the Entrez-Mmdb database, which usesVast (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/VAST/) for ali gnments, 1XGNb4 is listed as a low priority structural neighbour to 1LEA , even though Vast does not allow for permutations of secondary structure. If one looks at the actual alignment one ﬁnds that the permuted secondary structures are not aligned . In Figure 5 we compare our alignment with Vast. We show the sequential parts of our alignment and in particu lar all parts with secondary structure are shown. Vast aligns only 39 residues in this comparison, while we align 60. We note that we get all the 39 of the aligned residues ofVast but that we in addition align the sheet at the end of 1LEA with the sheet at the beginning of the domain in 1XGNb . This demonstrates the importance of having a procedure that takes permutations into account, which our method does. Otherwise, important similarities between protein structures will no t be found. For this example several restarts were performed with random initializatio n. Discussion A new approach to structure alignment has been presented and explored. It is based upon an error function encoding in terms of both binary assig nment variables and real- valued atom coordinates. The encoding allows for an extensi ve search through all possible 13************ *** **************** 5 18 26 59 65 71 \| \| \| \| \| \| 1LEA TARQQEVFDLIRDH PTRAEIAQRLGFRSPNAAEEHLKALARKGVIEIV -GI RLLQE 1XGNb4 VAQARFLLAKIKRE FAYRWLQN-D-M-PEGQLKLALKTLEKAGAIYGY IYM YVRDV \| \| \| \| \| \| 216 229 235 265 206 212 Figure 5: Alignment of 1LEA against the Entrez-Mmdb domain 1XGNb4 . The ’*’ denotes atoms also aligned by Vast.1XGNb4 is a circularly permuted version of 1LEA and our method ﬁnds this and aligns the sheet at the end of 1LEA with the sheet at the beginning of the domain in 1XGNb . alignments, including the ones involving arbitrary permut ations. The error function is eﬃciently minimized using a mean ﬁeld a pproximation of the assign- ment variables and exact translation/rotation of the atom c oordinates. As a by-product of this approximation, a probabilistic interpretation of t he result is available without tedious stochastic simulations. The approach is not sensit ive to the choice of distance metric, and hence to a large extent ignores outliers. Despite some conceptual similarities with the iterative dy namical programming method [3], our approach is probabilistic and more general. Also, a nd maybe more importantly, it is quite diﬀerent since permutations are allowed from the outset. For the latter reason, the algorithm in [3] cannot be derived as a special case in any limit. The method is readily extended to handle more detailed chain representations (e.g. side- chain orientation) and user-provided constraints of almos t any kind. The approach is evaluated using pairs of protein chains chos en to represent a wide variety of situations and the resulting alignments are successfull y compared with other methods that are available on WWW-servers. This evaluation is done u singCα-representations of the chains. Despite being very ﬂexible, generic and covering the entire space of alignments the method is on the average as fast as [6], slightly slower than [ 3] and signiﬁcantly faster than [5]. Also, it is very robust with respect to the algorith mic parameters used with a few exceptions. Once side-chains are included, the latter w ill disappear. 14Biological Implications There is a strong need for eﬃcient protein structure alignme nt algorithms. Aligning proteins forms the basis for studying functional relations hips among proteins and con- struction of phylogenetic trees. It is also very important f or structure prediction. Acknowledgments We thank Bo S¨ oderberg for valuable suggestions and Guoguan g Lu for fruitful discus- sions. This work was in part supported by the Swedish Natural Science Research Council and the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research. One of us (CP) thanks the Theory Group at SLAC, where this work was initiated, for its hospita lity. References [1] S. B. Needleman and C. D. Wunsch. A general method applica ble to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. ,48:443–453, 1971. [2] D. V. Laurents, S. Subbiah, and M. Levitt. Structural sim ilarity of dna-binding domains of bacteriophage repressors and the globin core. J. Mol. Biol. ,3:141–148, 1993. [3] M. Gerstein and M. Levitt. Using iterative dynamic progr amming to obtain accurate pairwise and multiple alignments of protein structures. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecu lar Biology , Menlo Park, CA, 1996. AAAI Press. [4] A. Falicov and F. E. Cohen. A surface of minimum area metri c for the structural comparison of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. ,258:871–892, 1996. [5] L. Holm and C. Sander. Protein structure comparison by al ignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. ,233:123–138, 1993. [6] J-F. Gibrat, T. Madej, and S. H. Bryant. Surprising simil arities in structure com- parison. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. ,6:377–385, 1996. [7] G. Lu. Top: A new method for protein structure and similarity searches .J. Appl. Cryst. ,33:176–183, 2000. 15[8] M. Gerstein and M. Levitt. Comprehensive assessment of a utomatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the scop classiﬁcation of proteins. Prot. Sci. , 7(2):445–456, 1998. [9] T. J. Hubbard, A. G. Murzin, S. E. Brenner, and C. Chothia. Scop: A structural classiﬁcation of proteins database. Nucl. Acid. Res. ,25:236–239, 1997. [10] Y. Matsuo and S. H. Bryant. Identiﬁcation of homologous core structures. Proteins , 35:70–79, 1999. [11] M. Ohlsson, C. Peterson, and A. L. Yuille. Track ﬁnding w ith deformable templates - the elastic arms approach. Comp. Phys. Comm. ,71:77–98, 1992. [12] S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. Optimiza tion by simulated annealing. Science ,220:671–680, 1983. [13] C. Peterson and B. S¨ oderberg. A new method for mapping o ptimization problems onto neural networks. Int. J. Neural. Syst. ,1:3–22, 1989. [14] J. von Neumann. Some matrix-inequalities and metrizat ion of matric-space. Tomsk Univ. Rev. ,1:286–300, 1937. [15] M. Ohlsson and H. Pi. A study of the mean ﬁeld approach to k napsack problems. Neur. Netw. ,10:263–271, 1997. [16] H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. B hat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne. The protein data bank. Nucl. Acid. Res. ,28:235–242, 2000. [17] A. Marchler-Bauer, K. J. Addess, C. Chappey, L. Geer, T. Madej, Y. Matsuo, Y. Wang, and S. H. Bryant. Mmdb :Entrez ’s 3d structure database. Nucl. Acid. Res.,27:240–243, 1999. 16
arXiv:physics/0006046v1 [physics.optics] 19 Jun 2000Bessel Beams Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princet on, NJ 08544 (June 17, 2000) 1 Problem Deduce the form of a cylindrically symmetric plane electrom agnetic wave that propagates in vacuum. A scalar, azimuthally symmetric wave of frequency ωthat propagates in the positive z direction could be written as ψ(r,t) =f(ρ)ei(kzz−ωt), (1) whereρ=√x2+y2. Then, the problem is to deduce the form of the radial functio nf(ρ) and any relevant condition on the wave number kz, and to relate that scalar wave function to a complete solution of Maxwell’s equations. The waveform (1) has both wave velocity and group velocity eq ual toω/kz. Comment on the apparent superluminal character of the wave in case th atkz< k=ω/c, wherecis the speed of light. 2 Solution As the desired solution for the radial wave function proves t o be a Bessel function, the cylindrical plane waves have come to be called Bessel beams, following their introduction by Durnin et al. [1, 2]. The question of superluminal behavior of Bessel beam s has recently been raised by Mugnai et al. [3]. Bessel beams are a realization of super-gain antennas [4, 5, 6] in the optical domain. A simple experiment to generate Bessel beams is described in [ 7]. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 present two methods of solution for Bess el beams that satisfy the Helmholtz wave equation. The issue of group and signal veloc ity for these waves is discussed in sec. 2.3. Forms of Bessel beams that satisfy Maxwell’s equ ations are given in sec. 2.4. 2.1 Solution via the Wave Equation On substituting the form (1) into the wave equation, ∇2ψ=1 c2∂2ψ ∂t2, (2) we obtain d2f dρ2+1 ρdf dρ+ (k2−k2 z)f= 0. (3) This is the diﬀerential equation for Bessel functions of ord er 0, so that f(ρ) =J0(krρ), (4) 1where k2 ρ+k2 z=k2. (5) The form of eq. (5) suggests that we introduce a (real) parame terαsuch that kρ=ksinα, andkz=kcosα. (6) Then, the desired cylindrical plane wave has the form ψ(r,t) =J0(ksinαρ)ei(kcosα z−ωt), (7) which is commonly called a Bessel beam. The physical signiﬁc ance of parameter α, and that of the group velocity vg=dω dkz=ω kz=vp=c cosα(8) will be discussed in sec. 2.3. While eq. (7) is a solution of the Helmholtz wave equation (2) , assigning ψ(r,t) to be a single component of an electric ﬁeld, say Ex, does not provide a full solution to Maxwell’s equations. For example, if E=ψˆx, then ∇ ·E=∂ψ/∂x ∝negationslash= 0. Bessel beams that satisfy Maxwell’s equations are given in sec. 2.4. 2.2 Solution via Scalar Diﬀraction Theory The Bessel beam (7) has large amplitude only for \|ρ\|<∼1/ksinα, and maintains the same radial proﬁle over arbitrarily large propagation distance z. This behavior appears to con- tradict the usual lore that a beam of minimum transverse exte ntadiﬀracts to ﬁll a cone of angle 1/a. Therefore, the Bessel beam (7) has been called “diﬀraction free” [2]. Here, we show that the Bessel beam does obey the formal laws of diﬀraction, and can be deduced from scalar diﬀraction theory. According to that theory [8], a cylindrically symmetric wav ef(ρ) of frequency ωat the planez= 0 propagates to point rwith amplitude ψ(r,t) =k 2πi/integraldisplay /integraldisplay ρ′dρ′dφf(ρ′)ei(kR−ωt) R, (9) whereRis the distance between the source and observation point. De ﬁning the observation point to be ( ρ,0,z), we have R2=z2+ρ2+ρ′2−2ρρ′cosφ, (10) so that for large z, R≈z+ρ2+ρ′2−2ρρ′cosφ 2z. (11) In the present case, we desire the amplitude to have form (1). As usual, we approximate Rbyzin the denominator of eq. (9), while using approximation (11 ) in the exponential factor. This leads to the integral equation f(ρ)eikzz=k 2πieikzeikρ2/2z z/integraldisplay∞ 0ρ′dρ′f(ρ′)eikρ′2/2z/integraldisplay2π 0dφe−ikρρ′cosφ/z =k ieikzeikρ2/2z z/integraldisplay∞ 0ρ′dρ′f(ρ′)J0(kρρ′/z)eikρ′2/2z, (12) 2using a well-known integral representation of the Bessel fu nctionJ0. It is now plausible that the desired eigenfunction f(ρ) is a Bessel function, say J0(kρρ), and on consulting a table of integrals of Bessel functions we ﬁnd an appropriate relation [9], /integraldisplay∞ 0ρ′dρ′J0(kρρ′)J0(kρρ′/z)eikρ′2/2z=iz ke−ikρ2/2ze−ik2 ρz/2kJ0(kρρ). (13) Comparing this with eq. (12), we see that f(ρ) =J0(kρρ) is indeed an eigenfunction provided that kz=k−k2 ρ 2k. (14) Thus, if we write kρ=ksinα, then for small α, kz≈k(1−α2/2)≈kcosα, (15) and the desired cylindrical wave again has form (7). Strictly speaking, the scalar diﬀraction theory reproduce s the “exact” result (7) only for smallα. But the scalar diﬀraction theory is only an approximation, and we predict with conﬁdence that an “exact” diﬀraction theory would lead to th e form (7) for all values of parameterα. That is, “diﬀraction-free” beams are predicted within diﬀ raction theory. It remains that the theory of diﬀraction predicts that an inﬁ nite aperture is needed to produce a beam whose transverse proﬁle is invariant with lon gitudinal distance. That a Bessel beam is no exception to this rule is reviewed in sec. 2. 3. The results of this section were inspired by [10]. One of the ﬁ rst solutions for Gaussian laser beams was based on scalar diﬀraction theory cast as an e igenfunction problem [11]. 2.3 Superluminal Behavior In general, the group velocity (8) of a Bessel beam exceeds th e speed of light. However, this apparently superluminal behavior cannot be used to transmi t signals faster than lightspeed. An important step towards understanding this comes from the interpretation of parameter αas the angle with respect to the zaxis of the wave vectors of an inﬁnite set of ordinary plane waves whose superposition yields the Bessel beam [12] . To see this, we invoke the integral representation of the Bessel function to write eq. (7) as ψ(r,t) =J0(ksinαρ)ei(kcosα z−ωt) =1 2π/integraldisplay2π 0dφei(ksinα xcosφ+ksinα ysinφ+kcosα z−ωt)(16) =1 2π/integraldisplay2π 0dφei(q·r−ωt), where the wave vector q, given by q=k(sinαcosφ,sinαsinφ,cosα), (17) makes angle αto thezaxis as claimed. 3We now see that a Bessel beam is rather simple to produce in pri nciple [2]. Just superpose all possible plane waves with equal amplitude and a common ph ase that make angle αto thezaxis, According to this prescription, we expect the zaxis to be uniformly illuminated by the Bessel beam. If that beam is created at the plane z= 0, then any annulus of equal radial extent in that plane must project equal power into the beam. F or largeρthis is readily conﬁrmed by noting that J2 0(ksinαρ)≈cos2(ksinαρ+δ)/(ksinαρ), so the integral of the power over an annulus of one radial period, ∆ ρ=π/(ksinα), is independent of radius. Thus, from an energy perspective a Bessel beam is not conﬁned to a ﬁnite region about thezaxis. If the beam is to propagate a distance zfrom the plane z= 0, it must have radial extent of at least ρ=ztanαatz= 0. An arbitrarily large initial aperture, and arbitrarily large power, is required to generate a Bessel beam that retai ns its “diﬀraction-free” character over an arbitrarily large distance. Each of the plane waves that makes up the Bessel beam propagat es with velocity calong a ray that makes angle αto thezaxis. The intersection of the zaxis and a plane of constant phase of any of these wave moves forward with superluminal sp eedc/cosα, which is equal to the phase and group velocities (8). This superluminal behavior does not represent any violatio n of special relativity, but is an example of the “scissors paradox” that the point of contac t of a pair of scissors could move faster than the speed of light while the tips of the blade s are moving together at sublightspeed. A ray of sunlight that makes angle αto the surface of the Earth similarly leads to a superluminal velocity c/cosαof the point of contact of a wave front with the Earth. However, we immediately see that a Bessel beam could not be us ed to send a signal from, say, the origin, (0 ,0,0), to a point (0 ,0,z) at a speed faster than light. A Bessel beam at (0,0,z) is made of rays of plane waves that intersect the plane z= 0 at radius ρ=ztanα. Hence, to deliver a message from (0 ,0,0) to (0,0,z) via a Bessel beam, the information must ﬁrst propagate from the origin out to at least radius ρ=ztanαatz= 0 to set up the beam. Then, the rays must propagate distance z/cosαto reach point zwith the message. The total distance traveled by the information is thus z(1 + sinα)/cosα, and the signal velocity vsis given by vs≈ccosα 1 + sinα, (18) which is always less than c. The group velocity and signal velocity for a Bessel beam are very diﬀerent. Rather than being a superluminal carrier of i nformation at its group velocity c/cosα, a modulated Bessel beam could be used to deliver messages on ly at speeds well below that of light. 2.4 Solution via the Vector Potential To deduce all components of the electric and magnetic ﬁelds o f a Bessel beam that satisﬁes Maxwell’s equation starting from a single scalar wave funct ion, we follow the suggestion of Davis [13] and seek solutions for a vector potential Athat has only a single component. We 4work in the Lorentz gauge (and Gaussian units), so that the sc alar potential Φ is related by ∇ ·A+1 c∂Φ ∂t= 0. (19) The vector potential can therefore have a nonzero divergenc e, which permits solutions having only a single component. Of course, the electric and magneti c ﬁelds can be deduced from the potentials via E=−∇Φ−1 c∂A ∂t, (20) and B=∇ ×A. (21) For this, the scalar potential must ﬁrst be deduced from the v ector potential using the Lorentz condition (19). We consider waves of frequency ωand time dependence of the form e−iωt, so that∂Φ/∂t=−ikΦ. Then, the Lorentz condition yields Φ =−i k∇ ·A, (22) and the electric ﬁeld is given by E=ik/bracketleftbigg A+1 k2∇(∇ ·A)/bracketrightbigg . (23) Then, ∇ ·E= 0 since ∇2(∇ ·A) +k2(∇ ·A) = 0 for a vector potential Aof frequency ω that satiﬁes the wave equation (2), etc. We already have a scalar solution (7) to the wave equation, wh ich we now interpret as the only nonzero component, Aj, of the vector potential for a Bessel beam that propagates in the +zdirection, Aj(r,t) =ψ(r,t)∝J0(ksinαρ)ei(kcosα z−ωt). (24) We consider ﬁve choices for the meaning of index j, namelyx,y,z,ρ, andφ, which lead to ﬁve types of Bessel beams. Of these, only the case of j=zcorresponds to physical, azimuthally symmetric ﬁelds, and so perhaps should be calle d the Bessel beam. 2.4.1j=x In this case, ∇ ·A=∂ψ ∂x=−ksinαx ρJ1(ksinαρ)ei(kcosα z−ωt). (25) In calculating ∇(∇ ·A) we use the identity J′ 1= (J0−J2)/2. Also, we divide EandBby the factorikto present the results in a simpler form. We ﬁnd, Ex=/braceleftBigg J0(̺)−sin2α ρ2/bracketleftBiggy2J1(̺) ̺−x2 2(J0(̺)−J2(̺))/bracketrightBigg/bracerightBigg ei(kcosα z−ωt), Ey=sin2αxy ρ2/bracketleftBiggJ1(̺) ̺−1 2(J0(̺)−J2(̺))/bracketrightBigg ei(kcosα z−ωt), (26) Ez=−isin 2αx 2ρJ1(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt), 5where ̺≡ksinαρ, (27) and Bx= 0, By= cosαJ0(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt), (28) Bz=−isinαx ρJ1(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt). A Bessel beam that obeys Maxwell’s equations and has purely xpolarization of its electric ﬁeld on the zaxis includes nonzero yandzpolarization at points oﬀ that axis, and does not exhibit the azimuthal symmetry of the underlying vector pot ential. 2.4.2j=y This case is very similar to that of j=x. 2.4.3j=z In this case the electric and magnet ﬁelds retain azimuthal s ymmetry, so that it is convenient to display the ρ,φandzcomponents of the ﬁelds. First, ∇ ·A=∂ψ ∂z=ikcosαJ0(ksinαρ)ei(kcosα z−ωt). (29) Then, we divide the electric and magnetic ﬁelds by ksinαto ﬁnd the relatively simple forms: Eρ= cosαJ1(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt), Eφ= 0, (30) Ez=isinαJ0(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt), and Bρ= 0, Bφ=J1(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt), (31) Bz= 0. This Bessel beam is a transverse magnetic (TM) wave. The radi al electric ﬁeld Eρvanishes on thezaxis (as it must if that axis is charge free), while the longit udinal electric ﬁeld Ez is maximal there. Cylindrically symmetric waves with radia l electric polarization are often called axicon beams [14]. 2.4.4j=ρ In this case, ∇ ·A=1 ρ∂ρψ ∂ρ=/bracketleftBiggJ0(ksinαρ) ρ−ksinαJ1(ksinαρ)/bracketrightBigg ei(kcosα z−ωt). (32) 6After dividing by ik, the electric and magnetic ﬁelds are Eρ=/braceleftBigg J0(̺)−sin2α/bracketleftBiggJ0(̺) ̺2+J1(̺) ̺+1 2(J0(̺−J2(̺))/bracketrightBigg/bracerightBigg ei(kcosα z−ωt), Eφ= 0, (33) Ez=icosαsinα/bracketleftBiggJ0(̺) ̺−J1(̺)/bracketrightBigg ei(kcosα z−ωt), and Bρ= 0, Bφ= cosαJ0(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt), (34) Bz= 0. The radial electric ﬁeld diverges as 1 /ρ2for smallρ, so this case is unphysical. 2.4.5j=φ Here, ∇ ·A=1 ρ∂ψ ∂φ= 0. (35) After dividing by ik, the electric and magnetic ﬁelds are Eρ= 0, Eφ=J0(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt), (36) Ez= 0, and Bρ=−cosαJ0(̺)ei(kcosα z−ωt), Bφ= 0, (37) Bz=−isinα/bracketleftBiggJ0(̺) ̺−J1(̺)/bracketrightBigg ei(kcosα z−ωt). These ﬁelds are unphysical due to the ﬁnite value of Eφatρ= 0, and the divergence of Bz asρ→0. 3 References [1] J. Durnin, Exact solutions for nondiﬀracting beams. I. The scalar theo ry, J. Opt. Soc. Am.A4, 651-654 (1987). [2] J. Durnin, J.J. Miceli, Jr. and J.H. Eberly, Diﬀraction-free beams , Phys. Rev. Lett. 778,1499-1501 (1987). 7[3] D. Mugnai, A. Ranfagni and R. Ruggeri, Observation of Superluminal Behavior in Wave Propagation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4830-4833 (2000). [4] S.A. Schelkunoﬀ, A methematical theory of linear arrays , Bell. Sys. Tech. J. 22, 80-107 (1943). [5] C.J. Bouwkamp and N.G. deBruijn, The problem of optimum antenna current distri- bution , Philips Res. Rep. 1, 135-158 (1946). [6] N. Yaru, A Note on Super-Gain Antenna Arrays , Proc. I.R.E. 39, 1081-1085 (1951). [7] C.A. McQueen, J. Arlt and K. Dholkia, An experiment to study a “nondiﬀracting” light beam, Am. J. Phys. 67, 912-915 (1999). [8] J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics , 3d ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999). [9] I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 5th ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994), integral 6.633.2. [10] A. Zhiping, Q. Lu and Z. Liu, Propagation of apertured Bessel beams , Appl. Opt. 34, 7183-7185 (1995). [11] G.D. Boyd and J.P. Gordon, Confocal Multimode Resonator for Millimeter Through Optical Wavelength Masers , Bell Sys. Tech. J. 40, 489-509 (1961). [12] P.W. Milonni and J.H. Eberly, Lasers (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1988), sec. 14.14. [13] L.W. Davis, Theory of electromagnetic beams , Phys. Rev. A 19, 1177-1179 (1979). [14] J.H. McLeod, The Axicon: A New Type of Optical Element , J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 592-597 (1954). 8
arXiv:physics/0006047v1 [physics.data-an] 19 Jun 2000Estimating the Kfunction of a point process with an application to cosmology * Michael L. Stein1, Jean M. Quashnock1,2and Ji Meng Loh1 TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 485 1Department of Statistics The University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60637 2Department of Physics Carthage College Kenosha, WI 53140 March 1999 Revised May 2000 This work was supported in part by National Science Foundati on grants DMS 95-04470 and 99-71127 (Loh and Stein) and NASA grant NAG 5-4406 and NSF grant DMS 97-0969 6 (Quashnock) .Estimating the Kfunction of a point process with an application to cosmology Michael L. Stein, Jean M. Quashnock and Ji Meng Loh Abstract: Motivated by the study of an important data set for understan ding the large-scale structure of the universe, this work considers the estimation of the reduced second moment function, or Kfunction, of a stationary point process on Robserved over a large number of segments of possibly varying lengths. Theory and simulation are used to compare the behavior of isotropic and rigid motio n correction estimators and some modiﬁcations of these estimators. These results ge nerally support the use of modiﬁed versions of the rigid motion correction. When app lied to a catalog of astronomical objects known as absorbers, the proposed meth ods conﬁrm results from earlier analyses of the absorber catalog showing clear evid ence of clustering up to 50 h−1Mpc and marginal evidence for clustering of matter on spatia l scales beyond 100 h−1Mpc, which is beyond the distance at which clustering of matt er is now generally accepted to exist. Key words: Reduced second moment function; bootstrapping; large-scale structure of the universe; heavy-element absorption-line systems AMS 1991 subject classiﬁcations: Primary 62M30; secondary 62P35, 60G55. Running title: Estimation for point processes *This work was supported in part by National Science Foundati on grant DMS 95-04470 and 99-71127 (Loh and Stein) and NASA grant NAG 5-4406 and NSF grant DMS 97-09696 (Q uashnock) .1.Introduction One way to describe a stationary spatial point processes is t hrough some measure of clumpi- ness of the events of the process. A commonly used measure of c lumpiness is the reduced second moment function K(t), deﬁned as the expected number of events within distance tof a typical event of the process divided by the intensity of the process. For a homogeneous Poisson process onRd, K(t) =µdtd,where µdis the volume of a unit ball in ddimensions. Thus, values of K(t) greater than µdtdare indicative of a process that is clumpier than Poisson and values less than µdtdare indicative of a process that is more regular than Poisson . When estimating K(t) based on observing a process within a bounded window W, a central problem is that for any event in W that is within tof the boundary of W, we do not know for sure how many other events are within tof it. Baddeley (1998) describes a number of ways of accounti ng for these edge eﬀects. Although there is quite a bit of asymptotic theory for how these estima tors behave when the underlying process is Poisson (Ripley 1988, Stein 1993), much less is kn own for non-Poisson processes. An interesting aspect of asymptotic theory for point proces ses is how one should take limits. Ripley (1988) and Stein (1993) consider a single growing win dow, which might appear to be the obvious way to take limits. However, Baddeley, et al. (1993) describe applications in which point processes are observed in many well-separated windows. For this setting, Baddeley and Gill (1997) argue that it is natural to consider taking limits by keeping the size of these windows ﬁxed and letting their number increase. As they point out, one advant age of this approach is that the edge eﬀects do not become negligible in the limit, since for any ﬁx edt, the fraction of events that are within tof a window boundary does not tend to 0. Thus, for comparing di ﬀerent approaches for handling edge eﬀects, increasing the number of windows may b e more informative than allowing a single region to grow in all dimensions, for which the fract ion of events that are within tof a window boundary does tend to 0. Another advantage of taking l imits by letting the number of windows increase is that if the process is independent in diﬀ erent regions, then limit theorems are easier to prove. This is particularly the case when the windo ws are all well-separated translations 1of the same set so that the observations of the process on the m ultiple windows can be reasonably modeled as iid realizations. Baddeley and Gill (1997) use th is approach to obtain weak convergence results for estimators of Kand other functions describing point process behavior. The resulting limiting variances are diﬃcult to evaluate and Baddeley and Gill (1997) only give explicit results for what they call the sparse Poisson limit, in which the inte nsity of a homogeneous Poisson process tends to 0. This work studies the estimation of Kfor a process on Rwhen the windows are segments of varying lengths. The fact that the windows are one-dimensio nal greatly simpliﬁes the calculation of estimators and permits the explicit derivation of some of th eir properties. The fact that the segment lengths vary provides for an interesting wrinkle on the appr oach of Baddeley and Gill (1997). Notably, simulation results in Section 6 show that the diﬀer ences between certain estimators are much greater when the segment lengths are unequal. Section 2 describes a cosmological problem that motivated t he present study. Vanden Berk, et al. (1996) put together a catalog of what are known as absor ption-line systems, or absorbers, detected along the lines-of-sight of QSOs (quasi-stellar o bjects or quasars). This catalog, a pre- liminary version of which can be obtained from Daniel Vanden Berk (danvb@astro.as.utexas.edu), provides important evidence about the large-scale structu re of the universe. To a ﬁrst approxima- tion, in appropriate units, the locations of these absorber s along the lines-of-sight can be viewed as multiple realizations of a stationary point process alon g segments of varying length. Section 3 describes the estimators of Kused in this paper and gives explicit expressions for the commonly used rigid motion correction and isotropic correc tion estimators when the observation region is a collection of line segments of varying lengths. I n addition, Section 3 provides an explicit expression for a modiﬁcation to the rigid motion correction advocated in Stein (1993). The fact that this estimator can be calculated explicitly is in contr ast to the situation in more than one dimension, in which case, calculating this modiﬁed rigid mo tion correction requires numerous numerical integrations even for simple regions such as circ les and rectangles. Finally, following 2on an idea of Picka (1996), Section 3 introduces another appr oach to modifying the rigid motion correction and isotropic correction. When the underlying p rocess is homogeneous Poisson, Picka’s modiﬁcation of the rigid motion correction has similar prop erties to the estimator proposed in Stein (1993), but theoretical results in Section 5 and simul ation results in Section 6 suggest that his approach may have some advantages and we recommend the ad option of the resulting estimator for routine use. When the underlying process is homogeneous Poisson, Sectio n 4 derives some asymptotic theory for the various estimators as the number of segments o n which the process is observed in- creases. As in the case of a single growing observation windo w studied in Stein (1993), the modiﬁed rigid motion correction asymptotically minimizes the vari ance of the estimator of K(t) among a large class of estimators possessing a type of unbiasedness property. Furthermore, if the segments are of equal length, then it is possible to give explicit comp arisons between various estimators. In particular, the ratio of the asymptotic mean squared error o f the ordinary rigid motion correction to that of the modiﬁed rigid motion correction equals 1 plus a positive term proportional to the expected number of events per line segment. Thus, the beneﬁt of the modiﬁcation is modest when this expectation is small, around 1, say, but can be quite sub stantial when this expectation is large. Section 5 considers asymptotic results when the underlying process is not necessarily ho- mogeneous Poisson, the segments are all of equal length and t he processes on diﬀerent segments are independent. In this case, it is essentially trivial to o btain a central limit theorem for the estimators of Kused here. From the general result, it is diﬃcult to make comp arisons between the various estimators. However, if the process on the diﬀer ent segments are each homogeneous Poisson but with intensities that vary from segment to segme nt according to some sequence of iid positive random variables, it is possible to give simple exp ressions for the asymptotic variances of the rigid motion correction and the two modiﬁcations of this estimator. These results show that the modiﬁcation in Stein (1993) has strictly smaller asympt otic variance than the ordinary rigid motion correction. Furthermore, the modiﬁcation of Picka ( 1996) has strictly smaller asymptotic 3variance than the modiﬁcation in Stein (1993) unless the ran dom intensities have 0 variance, in which case, the two modiﬁed estimators have equal asymptoti c variance. Section 6 reports on the results of a simulation study compar ing the ordinary rigid motion correction and the two modiﬁcations for both Poisson and non -Poisson processes, and equal and unequal segment lengths. While there is no theory showing th e general superiority of the modiﬁed estimators for non-Poisson processes, the modiﬁed estimat ors do, for the most part, outperform the unmodiﬁed estimator. The advantage of the modiﬁed estim ators tend to be larger when the process is more regular than Poisson, when the segment lengt hs are unequal and when tis near the length of the longest available segment. Section 7 applies the rigid motion correction and the two mod iﬁcations of it described in Section 3 to the estimation of Kfor the absorber catalog. In addition, approximate conﬁden ce intervals are obtained using bootstrapping based on viewin g the segments as the sampling units. All three estimates are similar and conﬁrm the ﬁnding in Quas hnock and Stein (1999) of clear evidence of clustering up to at least 50 h−1Mpc. In addition, the conﬁdence intervals based on the modiﬁed procedures produce a slightly stronger case for clustering of absorbers beyond 100 h−1Mpc. Whether there is clustering of matter at such large scal es and for the high redshifts in the absorber catalog is a critical issue in modern cosmology , since presently used models for the evolution of the universe have diﬃculty explaining such clu stering (Steidel, et al. 1998, Jing and Suto 1998). 2.The absorber catalog The cosmological principle, which states that on large enou gh spatial scales, the distribution of matter in the universe is homogeneous and isotropic, is a c entral tenet of modern cosmology (Peebles 1993). In cosmology, it is convenient to measure di stances in units of h−1Mpc, where Mpc, or megaparsec, is 3 .26×106light years and his an inexactly known dimensionless number that is believed to be between 0.5 and 0.75. As is common in the cosmological literature, in 4reporting distances determined from redshifts, we will ass ume that Hubble’s constant, H0, equals 100hkm s−1Mpc−1. To help calibrate one’s thinking about such distances, 1 h−1Mpc is a typical distance between neighboring galaxies. It is now generally agreed that galaxies cluster up to scales of 10–20 h−1Mpc (Davis and Peebles 1983, Loveday, et al. 1995). Furtherm ore, clustering on such scales can be reproduced by computer simulations of the evolution of the universe based on our present understanding of this evolution (see Zhang, et a l. 1998 and the references therein). However, there is some evidence of clustering of matter on sc ales of up to 100 h−1Mpc (see Quashnock, Vanden Berk and York (1996) and the references th erein) and a few cosmologists have speculated that clustering may exist at all spatial scales ( Coleman and Pietronero 1992, Sylos Labini, Montuori and Pietronero 1998), despite the fact tha t clustering at all scales contradicts both the cosmological principle and the considerable evide nce that supports it (Peebles 1993, p. 20, 45 and 221). Thus, determining the extent to which cluste ring of matter is present is of fundamental importance to modern cosmology. One way to measure the clustering of matter is through the dir ect observation of large numbers of galaxies. Several galaxy surveys in various regi ons of the sky have been done in recent years (Mart´ ınez 1997); Pons-Border´ ıa, et al. (1999) desc ribe recent work on estimating second moment structures of galaxy locations from such surveys. Th e presently ongoing Sloan Digital Sky Survey will be by far the largest such survey and will contain roughly 108galaxies, approximately 106of which will have spectroscopically measured redshifts (M argon 1999). An object’s redshift gives its velocity relative to the Earth, which, using Hubbl e’s Law, yields its approximate distance from the Earth. Galaxy surveys are limited by the fact that ga laxies are diﬃcult to observe directly beyond several hundred h−1Mpc. QSOs, on the other hand, are extremely bright and focuse d objects that can be readily detected at distances of several thousand h−1Mpc, going back to nearly the beginning of the universe. Matter that falls on the line- of-sight between the QSO and the Earth can absorb light from the QSO and thus be detected from the Ear th even though this matter cannot be directly observed. Certain types of matter absorb light i n a characteristic pattern of frequencies 5that can be used to identify the matter and, through the redsh ift of this absorption pattern, the relative velocity of this matter to the Earth. Astronomical objects detected in this way are called absorption-line systems or absorbers. As noted by Crotts, M elott, and York (1985), catalogs of absorbers provide a means for estimating the clustering of m atter over very large spatial scales. Vanden Berk et al. (1996), Quashnock, Vanden Berk and York (1 996) and Quashnock and Vanden Berk (1998) make use of an extensive catalog of heavy-elemen t absorption-line systems drawn from the literature to investigate the clustering of matter at va rious scales. York, et al. (1991) describe an earlier version of this catalog and a preliminary version of an updated catalog is available from Daniel Vanden Berk (danvb@astro.as.utexas.edu). Here we w ill use the same absorber catalog as in Quashnock and Stein (1999), who examined clustering in 35 2 CIVabsorbers (absorbers detected from the absorption-line patterns of C IV, or triply ionized carbon) along 274 QSO lines-of-sight. Although the relationship between C IVabsorbers and galaxies is unclear, they do appear to track the general spatial patterns of galaxies (Lanzetta, et al. 1 995, Quashnock and Vanden Berk 1998), and hence provide a plausible means for assessing the cluste ring of visible matter on large scales. Because the universe expands over time and, due to the ﬁnite v elocity of light, the more distant an object the further in the past we observe it, the me thod used for converting redshifts into distances from Earth is critical to the analysis of this catalog. Redshifts are generally denoted byzand, according to Hubble’s law, an object observed at redshi ftzis seen at a time when distances between objects were approximately (1 + z)−1times their present values. To correct for the expansion, here, as in Quashnock and Stein (1999), we use what are called comoving coordinates, which scale up all distances to what they would be today if all the matter in the universe moved exactly with the Hubble ﬂow (Peebles 1993). T hus, in examining the clustering of absorbers in comoving coordinates, we have removed the most important eﬀects of the universe’s expansion. If one did not make this correction, the volume de nsity of absorbers would drop approximately like (1 + z)3aszdecreases and we move towards the present. 6For various reasons, it is only possible to detect C IVabsorbers along a segment of each line-of-sight. The mean length of these segments in comovin g units is 303.3 h−1Mpc, with a range of 7.5 h−1Mpc to 439.8 h−1Mpc. For this catalog, the median redshift of the absorbers i s about 2.2, with the bulk of absorbers having redshifts from a bout 1.5 to 3. Our analysis acts as if clustering is both stationary in time and homogeneous in spa ce. We are more accurately examining an average clustering over the range of redshifts in the samp le at a cosmic epoch corresponding to a characteristic redshift of 2.2 (when the universe was abou t 1/3 its present scale and about 1/6 its present age). Section 7 provides further discussion of t his issue and its possible inﬂuence on our results. As in Quashnock and Stein (1999), we will act as if the absorbe r catalog can be viewed as multiple partial realizations of some stationary point pro cess on Ralong a series of segments. In particular, we will not attempt to use any information about the physical location of these segments in three-dimensional space. Using this simpliﬁcation, we w ill then be able to apply the methods described in the next section to the absorber catalog. 3.Methodology Suppose M1,... ,M pare simple, stationary point processes on Rwith a common probability law having intensity λand reduced second moment function K. We do not necessarily assume that M1,... ,M pare independent. For a Borel subset AofR, letMj(A) be the number of events of Mj contained in A. If [0,Qj] is the interval on which we observe Mj, then we can write the observation domain as D=p ∪ j=1{[0,Qj],j}, so that ( x,ℓ)∈Dimplies ℓ∈ {1,... ,p }andx∈[0,Qℓ]. Deﬁne Nj=Mj([0,Qj]),N+=/summationtextp j=1Njand denote the realized value of N+byn. For j= 1,... ,N +, let (Xj,Lj) be the random locations of these observed events with reali zed values ( xj,ℓj) for j= 1,... ,n . The basic principle behind all edge-corrected estimators o fKdescribed by Ripley (1988) is to ﬁrst ﬁnd an exactly unbiased estimator of λ2×volume of observation domain ×K(t) and 7then to divide by an estimator of ( λ2×volume). Here, the volume of the observation domain is Q+=/summationtextp j=1Qj. For a symmetric function φonD×D, deﬁne T(φ) =/summationtext j/ne}ationslash=kφ/parenleftbig (Xj,Lj),(Xk,Lk)/parenrightbig . Then the unbiasedness constraint requires that ET(φ) =λ2Q+K(t) (1) for any reduced moment function K. Estimating λ2byN+(N+−1)/Q2 +yields /tildewideK(t) =  Q+T(φ) N+(N+−1)ifN+>1, 0 otherwise as a natural estimator of K(t). There is an inﬁnite array of functions φsatisfying (1). Two popular choices are the rigid motion correction (Ohser and Stoyan 1981) and the isotropic correction (Ripley 1976). Asymptotic results in Sections 4 and 5 suggest that modiﬁed versions of t he rigid motion correction have good large sample properties when the underlying process is Pois son, so we focus on this correction here, although we also give some results for the isotropic co rrection for comparison. It is fairly elementary to prove that the rigid motion correction satisﬁ es (1) when the observation domain D is a subset of R. First, for a stationary point process MonRwith intensity λ, deﬁne the reduced second moment measure Kbyλ2K(ds)dx= 2E{M(dx)M(x+ds)}, in which case, the reduced second moment function Kis given by K(t) =/integraltext (0,t]K(ds). Denote the indicator function by 1 {·}, use\|A\|to indicate the Lebesgue measure of the set A⊂RandAsto indicate the set Atranslated by the amount s. The rigid motion correction is given by φ(x,y) =1{\|x−y\| ≤t}\|D\| \|D∩Dx−y\|. We can then write T(φ) =/integraldisplay s∈[−t,0)∪(0,t]/integraldisplay x∈RM(dx)M(x+ds)1{x∈D,x+s∈D} \|D∩Ds\| 8= 2/integraldisplay s∈(0,t]/integraldisplay x∈RM(dx)M(x+ds)1{x∈D,x+s∈D} \|D∩Ds\|, so that E{T(φ)}= 2/integraldisplay s∈(0,t]/integraldisplay x∈R1 2λ2K(ds)1{x∈D,x+s∈D} \|D∩Ds\|dx = 2/integraldisplay s∈(0,t]1 2λ2\|D∩Ds\| \|D∩Ds\|K(ds) =λ2K(t). One way to view the setting where Dis a collection of line segments is to think of these segments as being widely spaced intervals on R, in which case, we just have a special case of the treatment in the preceding paragraph. However, it will be he lpful in the subsequent development to think of Dasp ∪ j=1{[0,Qj],j}. The rigid motion correction can then be deﬁned by taking φto be φR/parenleftbig (x,k),(y,ℓ)/parenrightbig =Q+1{\|x−y\| ≤t,k=ℓ}/summationtextp j=1(Qj− \|x−y\|)+, where 1 {·}is an indicator function. To write the isotropic correction in terms of a symmetric function, let φI/parenleftbig (x,k),(y,ℓ)/parenrightbig =Q+1{\|x−y\| ≤t,k=ℓ}{αℓ(x,y) +αℓ(y,x)} Q+−/summationtextp j=1min{(2\|x−y\| −Qj)+,Qj}, (2) where αℓ(x,y)−1= 1{x+\|y−x\|< Q ℓ}+1{x−\|y−x\|>0}. Deﬁne /tildewideKR(t) =Q+T(φR)/{N+(N+−1)} and/tildewideKI(t) =Q+T(φI)/{N+(N+−1)}, where it is understood that /tildewideKR(t) =/tildewideKI(t) = 0 for N+≤1. We have used Ohser’s extension of the isotropic correction t o cover the case t >1 2min(Q1,... ,Q p) (Ohser 1983). As Ripley (1988, p. 32) notes, this extension i s generally not of much practical value when there is a single contiguous observation window. Howev er, when there are multiple windows of various sizes, the extension is critical. For the absorbe r catalog, for example, one is certainly interested in estimating Kat distances greater than 3 .75h−1Mpc, the value of1 2min(Q1,... ,Q p) in the catalog. 9Note that φI/parenleftbig (x,k),(y,ℓ)/parenrightbig =φR/parenleftbig (x,k),(y,ℓ)/parenrightbig = 0 if k/ne}ationslash=ℓ, which just says that pairs of observations on diﬀerent segments do not contribute to the e stimate of K(t). Since we have made no assumption about the joint distribution of M1,... ,M p, for (1) to be valid, it is necessary to assume φ/parenleftbig (x,k),(y,ℓ)/parenrightbig = 0 whenever k/ne}ationslash=ℓ. Thus, throughout this work, we will only consider φ satisfying (A)φ/parenleftbig (x,k),(y,ℓ)/parenrightbig = 0 for k/ne}ationslash=ℓ. We next show how to apply to the present setting the method dev eloped in Stein (1993) for improving upon any estimator of Kof the form Q+T(φ)/{N+(N+−1)}withφsatisfying (1). Sup- pose ( X,L) is uniformly distributed on Din the sense that P(L=ℓ) =Qℓ/Q+and the density of Xgiven L=ℓis uniform on [0 ,Qℓ]. Then M1,... ,M pstationary with common distribution imply that for any real-valued function gfor which E\|g(X,L)\|<∞,E/summationtextN+ j=1g(Xj,Lj) =λQ+Eg(X,L), so that/summationtextN+ j=1{g(Xj,Lj)−Eg(X,L)}is an unbiased estimator of 0. The idea in Stein (1993) is to choose gto minimize varn/bracketleftbigg T(φ)−n/summationdisplay j=1{g(Xj,Lj)−Eg(X,L)}/bracketrightbigg , where var nmeans to compute the variance under binomial sampling: N+=nis ﬁxed and, for j= 1,... ,n , (Xj,Lj) are independent and all have the same distribution as ( X,L). Proposition 1 in Stein (1993) shows that for n≥1 and ( y,m)∈D, a minimizing gis 2(n−1)h(y,m;φ)/Q+, where h(y,m;φ) =/summationtextp ℓ=1/integraltextQℓ 0φ/parenleftbig (x,l),(y,m)/parenrightbig dx. Under (A), h(y,m;φ) =/integraltextQm 0φ/parenleftbig (x,m),(y,m)/parenrightbig dx. Now deﬁne T∗(φ) =T(φ)−2(N+−1) Q+N+/summationdisplay j=1{h(Xj,Lj;φ)−Eh(X,L;φ)}. Note that if φsatisﬁes (1), Eh(X,L;φ) = 2t. Under binomial sampling, we always have var n{T∗(φ)} ≤varn{T(φ)}. This suggests that the estimator /hatwideK(t) =Q+T∗(φ)/{N+(N+−1)}forN+>1 and 0 otherwise may be preferred over /tildewideK(t). As with the unmodiﬁed estimators, /hatwideKR(t) indicates that φ=φRand/hatwideKI(t) indicates that φ=φI. 10Picka (1996) suggests another approach to modifying estima tes of second moment measures. He considered random sets for which the probability of any ﬁx ed point being in the random set is positive, but his approach can also be applied to point proce sses, for which this probability is 0. For point processes, his idea corresponds to using an estimator ofλQ+other than N+in/tildewideK. For any real- valued function conDsatisfying/summationtextp ℓ=1/integraltextQℓ 0c(x,ℓ)dx=Q+,/hatwideλc=Q−1 +/summationtextN+ j=1c(Xj,Lj) is an unbiased estimator of λ. Let us consider estimators of K(t) of the form Q+T(φ)/{/hatwideλcQ+(/hatwideλcQ+−1)}. It is not generally possible to calculate the exact variance of su ch estimators under binomial sampling. However, for Q+suﬃciently large, /hatwideλc−λandQ−1 +T(φ)−λ2K(t) should be small in probability, which suggests using a ﬁrst-order Taylor series approximat ion to obtain Q+T(φ) /hatwideλcQ+(/hatwideλcQ+−1)≈1 λ2Q+T(φ)−2K(t) λ(/hatwideλc−λ). (3) For a given φand subject to csatisfying the unbiasedness constraint, now consider mini mizing the variance of the right side of (3) when M1,... ,M pare iid Poisson processes with intensity λ. It is a straightforward variational problem to show that a mi nimizing cis given by c(x,ℓ;φ) = h(x,ℓ;φ)/(2t). Deﬁne ˘K(t) =Q+T(φ) /summationtextN+ j=1c(Xj,Lj;φ)/braceleftbig/summationtextN+ j=1c(Xj,Lj;φ)−1/bracerightbig forN+>1 and ˘K(t) = 0 otherwise. As with /tildewideKand/hatwideK, subscripts RorIon˘Kindicate that φ=φRorφ=φI. When M1,... ,M pare iid Poisson processes, /hatwideK(t) and ˘K(t) should behave similarly. To see this, ﬁrst use Taylor series to obtain /hatwideK(t)≈1 λ2Q+T(φ)−2 λQ+N+/summationdisplay j=1h(Xj,Lj;φ) + 2{2t−K(t)}N+ λQ++ 2K(t). 11From this approximation and (3), when K(t) = 2t, both /hatwideKand˘Kare approximately 1 λ2Q+T(φ)−2 λQ+N+/summationdisplay j=1h(Xj,Lj;φ) + 4t. Thus, for Q+large, the two estimators will be similar when M1,... ,M pare iid Poisson processes, but they are not necessarily similar otherwise. Even for simple regions in two or more dimensions, calculati ngh(·;φ) requires numerical integrations. However, when the observation region is D=p ∪ j=1{[0,Qj],j}, then it is possible to give an explicit expression for h(x,ℓ;φR) for ( x,ℓ)∈D. For convenience, we will assume that the Qjs have been arranged in increasing order. For r < Q p, deﬁne j(r) = min 1≤j≤p{j:Qj≥r}and letU(r) =/summationtextp j=1(Qj−r)+. For j= 1,... ,p , letUj=U(Qj) and set Q0= 0 so that U0=Q+. Furthermore, deﬁne κ(x,t) =j(x∧t)−1/summationdisplay j=11 p−j+ 1log/parenleftbiggUj−1 Uj/parenrightbigg +1 p−j(x∧t) + 1log/braceleftbiggUj(x∧t)−1 U(x∧t)/bracerightbigg , where a sum whose upper limit is less than its lower limit is de ﬁned to be 0 and x∧tis the minimum of xandt. Then Q−1 +h(x,ℓ;φR) =κ(x,t) +κ(Qℓ−x,t) (4) (see the appendix). If the segment lengths are all equal, κ(x,t) =p−1log[Q/{Q−(x∧t)}]. It is also possible to evaluate h(x,ℓ;φI) explicitly, but the resulting expression is rather cumbersome. If t <1 2min(Q1,···,Qp), then the denominator in the deﬁnition of φIin (2) equals Q+whenever \|x−y\| ≤t, which greatly simpliﬁes matters. In this case, it is possib le to show that h(x,ℓ;φI) =t+ (x∧t) +{(Qℓ−x)∧t} −1 2/parenleftigx 2∧t/parenrightig −1 2/parenleftbiggQℓ−x 2∧t/parenrightbigg . 12A second special case yielding a simple result is when Q1=···=Qp=Q. When t <1 2Q, the preceding expression for happlies and for t≥1 2Q, h(x,ℓ;φI) =3Q 4+{x∧(Q−x)}+Qlog/bracketleftigg1 2Q {x∧(Q−x)} ∨(Q−t)/bracketrightigg , where x∨yis the maximum of xandy. There is a considerable literature in astrophysical journa ls on estimating second order char- acteristics of galaxy locations based on galaxy surveys in l arge, contiguous regions of the sky. Mart´ ınez (1997) and Stoyan and Stoyan (2000) provide two re cent reviews of this work. Astro- physicists have generally focused on estimating the pair co rrelation function, which is, after a normalization, just the derivative of the Kfunction. For example, for a stationary point process MonR, assuming Kis diﬀerentiable, the pair correlation function is1 2K′. Similar to /hatwideKhere, Landy and Szalay (1993) make use of unbiased estimators of 0 t o modify estimators of second order characteristics. Moreover, similar to ˘K, Hamilton (1993) describes estimators of the pair correla- tion function of the form T(φ)//hatwideλ2in which λ2is estimated by something other than the obvious estimator. We prefer to estimate Krather than the pair correlation function because it separa tes the problem of handling edge eﬀects from that of density esti mation and the consequent smoothing problem. If one wants to estimate the pair correlation funct ion, we recommend ﬁrst computing an appropriately edge-corrected estimate of Kand then diﬀerentiating a smoothed version of this estimate. 4.Asymptotic theory when the truth is Poisson There are a number of ways one might take limits to study the pr operties of the estimators proposed in the previous section. One possibility would be t o ﬁxpand let the Qjs tend to ∞. In this approach, the fraction of the observation region within a ﬁx ed distance of an endpoint of a segment tends to 0 and, as in Ripley (1988) and Stein (1993), the varia nce of all reasonable estimators of K(t) for ﬁxed thave the same ﬁrst-order asymptotic behavior under binomia l sampling. However, 13for the absorber catalog, in which p= 274 and the number of absorbers per line is 1 .28, a more relevant choice is to uniformly bound the Qjs and let p→ ∞. This limiting approach keeps the fraction of the observation region within a ﬁxed distance of an endpoint of a segment bounded away from 0 with the result that the diﬀerences between various es timators under binomial sampling show up in the leading terms for the asymptotic variance. Han sen, Gill and Baddeley (1996) and Baddeley and Gill (1997) take a similar asymptotic approach for studying estimators of properties of spatial point processes based on observing the process in an increasing number of identical and distantly spaced windows. We now consider adapting the asymptotic results in Ripley (1 988) and Stein (1993) to the present setting. First, we give exact expressions for the va riance under binomial sampling of both /tildewideK(t) and /hatwideK(t). Following Ripley (1988), for a symmetric function φonD×Dsatisfying (A), deﬁne S(φ) =p/summationdisplay j=1/integraldisplayQj 0/integraldisplayQj 0φ/parenleftbig (x,j),(y,j)/parenrightbig dxdy, S1(φ) =p/summationdisplay j=1/integraldisplayQj 0/braceleftbigg/integraldisplayQj 0φ/parenleftbig (x,j),(y,j)/parenrightbig dx/bracerightbigg2 dy, and S2(φ) =p/summationdisplay j=1/integraldisplayQj 0/integraldisplayQj 0φ/parenleftbig (x,j),(y,j)/parenrightbig2dxdy. Under (A) (Ripley 1988), varn{T(φ)}=2n(n−1) Q2 +/braceleftbigg S2(φ) +2n−4 Q+S1(φ)−2n−3 Q2 +S(φ)2/bracerightbigg (5) and (Stein 1993) varn{T∗(φ)}=2n(n−1) Q2 +/braceleftbigg S2(φ)−2 Q+S1(φ) +1 Q2 +S(φ)2/bracerightbigg . (6) We now want to study what happens as p→ ∞. Suppose Q1,Q2,...is a sequence of positive numbers and the subscript pis used to indicate the dependence of a term on the number of 14segments observed, so that Dp=p ∪ j=1{[0,Qj],j},Q+p=/summationtextp j=1QjandN+pis the total number of events on Dp. Suppose {φp}is a sequence of functions for which the domain of φpisDp×Dpand φpis symmetric for all p. In addition to φpsatisfying (A) for all p, we will assume the following regularity conditions: (B) The φps are uniformly bounded; (C) For each p,φpsatisﬁes the unbiasedness constraint in (1); (D) The Qjs are bounded away from 0 and ∞. Under (A)–(D), we have S(φp) = 2tQ+p=O(p),S1(φp) =O(p) and S2(φp) =O(p) but is not o(p). It follows that as p→ ∞, S2(φp)−2 Q+pS1(φp) +1 Q2 +pS(φp)2=S2(φp)/braceleftbig 1 +O/parenleftbig p−1/parenrightbig/bracerightbig . (7) Comparing (6) and (7) suggests that minimizing S2(φp) subject to (A)–(D) is nearly the same as minimizing var n{T∗(φp)}. Stein (1993) shows that subject to (C), the rigid motion cor rection gives a minimizer of S2(φp). The appendix gives an explicit expression for S2(φR) in terms of elementary functions. We next obtain an analog to Proposition 2 in Stein (1993), whi ch demonstrates the asymp- totic optimality under the Poisson model for /hatwideKRamong a certain class of estimators as the dimen- sions of a single observation window increase. For a sequenc e of functions {φp}onDp×Dpand a sequence of functions {gp}onDp× {0,1,...}, deﬁne the statistic Θ( φp,gp) by Θ(φp,gp) =Q+p N+p(N+p−1) T(φp)−N+p/summationdisplay j=1/braceleftigg gp/parenleftbig (Xj,Lj),N+p/parenrightbig −1 Q+pp/summationdisplay ℓ=1/integraldisplayQℓ 0gp/parenleftbig (x,ℓ),N+p/parenrightbig dx/bracerightigg  ifN+p>1 and 0 otherwise. Write Eλto indicate expectations assuming M1,M2,...are inde- pendent Poisson processes with constant intensity λindependent of p. All ensuing asymptotic results in the rest of this section involve expectations ove r the Poisson model and can be proven by ﬁrst conditioning on N+p, using the fact that under this model, the conditional distr ibution of the 15observed events on Dpfollows binomial sampling, and ﬁnally, by averaging over th e distribution ofN+p, which follows a Poisson distribution with mean λQ+p. Proposition 1. Suppose {φp}satisﬁes (A)–(C), Eλ/braceleftiggN+p/summationdisplay j=1/vextendsingle/vextendsinglegp/parenleftbig (Xj,Lj),N+p/parenrightbig/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/bracerightigg <∞for all p, theQjs satisfy (D) and p−1/summationtext(Qj−t)+is bounded away from 0 as p→ ∞. Then p2/bracketleftbigg Eλ/braceleftig /hatwideKR(t)−2t/bracerightig2 −Eλ{Θ(φp,gp)−2t}2/bracketrightbigg is bounded from above as p→ ∞. The assumption that p−1/summationtext(Qj−t)+is bounded away from 0 as p→ ∞ guarantees that {φR p} satisﬁes (B). Since, under the conditions of Proposition 1, Eλ/braceleftbig/hatwideKR(t)−2t/bracerightbig2=O(p−1) asp→ ∞, this result says that when the underlying processes are inde pendent Poisson with equal intensity, /hatwideKRasymptotically minimizes the mean squared error among all s equences of estimators of the form considered in the proposition. Let us now make some comparisons of the asymptotic mean squar ed errors of some esti- mators of K(t) under the Poisson model when all Qjs equal Qands=t/Q. From (6), we get Eλ/braceleftig /hatwideK(t)−2t/bracerightig2 ∼2 λ2p2Q2S2(φp). Thus, (17) in the appendix implies Eλ/braceleftig /hatwideKR(t)−2t/bracerightig2 ∼ −4 λ2plog(1−s) (8) and (20) in the appendix implies Eλ/braceleftig /hatwideKI(t)−2t/bracerightig2 ∼4 λ2p×  s+3 4s2if 0< s≤1 3, 1 12+1 2s+3 2s2if1 3≤s≤1 2and 17 24−log 2−log(1−s) if1 2≤s <1.(9) From Proposition 1, the right side of (9) must be at least as la rge as the right side of (8) for all s∈(0,1). In fact, it is a straightforward exercise to show analyti cally that the right side of (9) is strictly greater than the right side of (8) for all s∈(0,1). Thus, as p→ ∞, the modiﬁed rigid motion estimator /hatwideKRperforms nonnegligibly better than either the ordinary or m odiﬁed isotropic 16estimator for any t∈(0,Q) under the Poisson model, although the improvement over the modiﬁed isotropic estimator is minor. Figure 1 shows the ratio of the asymptotic variances for /hatwideKI(t) and /hatwideKR(t) under the Poisson model, which reaches a maximum of approxi mately 1 .032 near t= 0.247Q. The asymptotic results in (8) and (9) are unchanged if ˘KRand˘KIreplace /hatwideKRand/hatwideKI. We next compare the modiﬁed and unmodiﬁed rigid motion estim ators as p→ ∞ when all Qjs equal Q. From (5), Eλ/braceleftig /tildewideK(t)−2t/bracerightig2 ∼2 λ2p2Q2S2(φp) +4 λp2Q2S1(φp)−16t2 λpQ. Using (17) and (18) in the appendix then yields Eλ/braceleftig /tildewideKR(t)−2t/bracerightig2 ∼4 λ2p/bracketleftbig −log(1−s) + 4λQ{γ(s)−s2}/bracketrightbig , (10) where γ(s) =1 4/integraldisplay1 0/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay1 01{\|x−y\| ≤s} 1− \|x−y\|dy/bracketrightbigg2 dx. (11) Equation (19) in the appendix gives a more explicit expressi on for γ. Note that γ(s)−s2=1 4/integraldisplay1 0/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay1 01{\|x−y\| ≤s} 1− \|x−y\|dy−2s/bracketrightbigg2 dx, which is strictly positive for all s∈(0,1]. Comparing (8) and (10) shows that, in terms of mean squared er ror, the asymptotic relative advantage of either modiﬁed rigid motion estimator over the unmodiﬁed rigid motion estimator is proportional to λQ, the expected number of events per segment. Figure 2 plots 4 {γ(s)− s2}/{−log(1−s)}, which is less than 0.124 for all s∈(0,1) and is less than 0.061 for all s <0.9. Thus, at least for equal Qjs, we should not expect a large improvement under the Poisson model due to the modiﬁcations when there are only 1.28 events per se gment as in the absorber catalog. Simulation results in Section 6 show that larger improvemen ts can occur with unequal Qjs. 175.Some asymptotic theory for non-Poisson processes There is a decided lack of asymptotic theory that permits use ful comparisons of estimators of Kwhen the underlying process is not Poisson. Stein (1995) der ives results showing the advantage of estimators like /hatwideKover those like /tildewideK, but the asymptotic approach taken there requires that the distance tat which one is estimating Kbe large compared to the distances at which the underlying process shows nontrivial dependence. When the o bservation window is made up of many segments, especially if the Qjs are equal and the Mjs are independent, it appears feasible to develop some useful asymptotic results for non-Poisson p rocesses. This section describes some general asymptotic results for the estimators /tildewideK,/hatwideKand˘Kdescribed in Section 3. These results are used to demonstrate that if M1,M2,...are, conditional on Λ 1,Λ2,..., independent Poisson processes with Mjhaving intensity Λ j, where the Λ js are iid positive random variables, then as p→ ∞,˘KR(t) is superior to /hatwideKR(t), which is in turn superior to /tildewideKR(t). Suppose M1,M2,...are iid simple, stationary point processes on Rwith intensity λand reduced second moment function K. Assume Q=Q1=Q2=···and let X1j,... ,X Njjbe the locations of the Njevents from Mjon (0,Q). For a bounded, symmetric function φon (0,Q)×(0,Q), deﬁne Φ j=/summationtext k/ne}ationslash=ℓφ(Xkj,Xℓj). Analogous to (1), suppose EΦj=λ2QK(t) for any reduced second moment function Kfor the Mjs. Deﬁne Gj= (2t)−1/summationtextNj k=1/integraltextQ 0φ(Xkj,y)dy, so that EGj=λQ. Using these deﬁnitions, the estimators described in Secti on 3 are given by /tildewideK(t) =pQ/summationtextp j=1Φj /summationtextp j=1Nj/parenleftig/summationtextp j=1Nj−1/parenrightig, /hatwideK(t) =/tildewideK(t)−4t/summationtextp j=1Gj/summationtextp j=1Nj+ 4t and ˘K(t) =pQ/summationtextp j=1Φj /summationtextp j=1Gj/parenleftig/summationtextp j=1Gj−1/parenrightig. 18Furthermore, since {Nj,Φj,Gj}∞ j=1is an iid trivariate sequence, we can readily derive the limi ting distribution of these estimators. Speciﬁcally, if E(N4 1)<∞, then Φ 1andG1have ﬁnite second moments, so as p→ ∞, p1/2 1 p/summationtextp j=1Nj−λQ 1 p/summationtextp j=1Φj−λ2QK(t) 1 p/summationtextp j=1Gj−λQ L→N(0,Σ), whereL→indicates convergence in distribution and Σ is the 3 ×3 covariance matrix of ( N1,Φ1,G1). Using ﬁrst-order Taylor series, we get λQp1/2{/tildewideK(t)−K(t)}L→N(0,/tildewideV),λQp1/2{/tildewideK(t)−K(t)}L→ N(0,/hatwideV) and λQp1/2{˘K(t)−K(t)}L→N(0,˘V), where /tildewideV= 4K(t)2var(N1) +1 λ2var(Φ 1)−4K(t) λcov(N1,Φ1), (12) /hatwideV= 4{K(t)−2t}2var(N1) +1 λ2var(Φ 1) + 16 t2var(G1)−4{K(t)−2t} λcov(N1,Φ1) −8t λcov(Φ 1,G1) + 16 {K(t)−2t}cov(N1,G1)(13) and ˘V= 4K(t)2var(G1) +1 λ2var(Φ 1)−4K(t) λcov(Φ 1,G1). (14) As expected, ˘V=/hatwideVwhen K(t) = 2t. To calculate the limiting behavior of these estimators for a ny given φ,Qand law of M1, we only have to compute the covariance matrix Σ and plug the resu lts into (12)–(14). In some limited cases this computation can be done analytically or more ofte n by numerical integration; otherwise, Σ is easily approximated by simulation whenever M1can be readily simulated. We now consider a simple setting in which Σ can be explicitly d erived. Suppose M1,M2,... are, conditional on Λ 1,Λ2,..., independent Poisson processes with Mjhaving intensity Λ j, where the Λ js are iid positive random variables. Such a model could serve as an approximation for a Cox process (Daley and Vere-Jones 1988, Section 8.5) observed o ver widely spaced segments where the random intensity function Λ( ·) of the process has little variation over distances of lengt hQbut 19the segments are suﬃciently spaced so that the behavior of Λ( ·) in diﬀerent segments is essentially independent. Next, suppose φ(x,y) =Q1{\|x−y\| ≤t}/(Q− \|x−y\|), so that we are using the rigid motion estimator. In this case, the elements of Σ can be readily calc ulated in terms of the moments of Λ 1. Writing mjforE(Λj 1), we have λ=m1,K(t) = 2tm2/m2 1, var(N1) =Qm1+Q2(m2−m2 1), var(Φ 1) = 16 Q3γ/parenleftbiggt Q/parenrightbigg m3−4Q2log/parenleftbigg 1−t Q/parenrightbigg m2+ 4t2Q2(m4−m2 2), var(G1) =Q3 t2γ/parenleftbiggt Q/parenrightbigg m1+Q2(m2−m2 1), cov(N1,Φ1) = 4tQm 2+ 2tQ2(m3−m1m2), cov(N1,G1) =Qm1+Q2(m2−m2 1) and cov(Φ 1,G1) =4Q3 tγ/parenleftbiggt Q/parenrightbigg m2+ 2tQ2(m3−m1m2). Each of these results can be obtained by conditioning on Λ 1. For example, var(Φ 1) =E{var(Φ 1\|Λ1)}+ var{E(Φ1\|Λ1)} =E/bracketleftigg 4Λ3 1/integraldisplayQ 0/braceleftbigg/integraldisplayQ 0φ(x,y)dy/bracerightbigg2 dx+ 2Λ2 1/integraldisplayQ 0/integraldisplayQ 0φ(x,y)2dxdy/bracketrightigg + var(2 tΛ2 1Q) = 16Q3γ/parenleftbiggt Q/parenrightbigg m3−4Q2log/parenleftbigg 1−t Q/parenrightbigg m2+ 4t2Q2(m4−m2 2), where the second step follows from (10) in Ripley (1988, p. 30 ) and the last step uses (17) and (18) in the appendix. Plugging these results into (12)–(14) yields /tildewideVR=1 m2 1var(Φ 1)−16t2Qm2 2 m3 1+ 16t2Q2m2(m2 2−m1m3) m4 1, /hatwideVR=1 m2 1var(Φ 1)−16t2Q(m2−m2 1)2 m3 1−16Q3γ/parenleftbiggt Q/parenrightbigg/parenleftbigg2m2 m1−m1/parenrightbigg + 16t2Q2m2(m2 2−m1m3) m4 1 20and ˘VR=1 m2 1var(Φ 1)−16Q3γ/parenleftbiggt Q/parenrightbiggm2 2 m3 1+ 16t2Q2m2(m2 2−m1m3) m4 1, where the subscript Rindicates that the asymptotic variance is for the appropria te version of the rigid motion estimator. Thus, /tildewideVR−/hatwideVR= 16Q3/parenleftbigg2m2 m1−m1/parenrightbigg/braceleftbigg γ/parenleftbiggt Q/parenrightbigg −t2 Q2/bracerightbigg , (15) which is positive on (0 ,1) since γ(s)−s2>0 fors∈(0,1) and m2≥m2 1. Furthermore, /hatwideVR−˘VR= 16Q3(m2−m2 1)2 m3 1/braceleftbigg γ/parenleftbiggt Q/parenrightbigg −t2 Q2/bracerightbigg , (16) which is positive on (0 ,1) whenever m2> m2 1. Thus, /hatwideVR>˘VRunless var Λ 1= 0, in which case, m2=m2 1and/hatwideVR=˘VR. The arguments in this section largely carry over to estimato rs for the reduced second moment function of iid point processes on Rdobserved overp ∪ j=1{A,j}for some A⊂Rd. In particular, (12)– (14) still hold if, at the appropriate places, 2 tis replaced by µdtd, the volume of a ball of radius tinRd. Furthermore, the comparisons between /tildewideVR,/hatwideVRand˘VRin (15) and (16) still hold after replacing γ(t/Q)−t2/Q2by/integraltext A/braceleftbig /integraltext Aφ(x,y)dy−µdtd/bracerightbig2dx. 6.Simulation study The asymptotic results in the preceding two sections provid e only limited information about the relative advantages of the various estimators, especia lly for non-Poisson processes or unequal Qjs. Because the estimators /tildewideKR,/hatwideKRand˘KRcan all be explicitly calculated, it is fairly straight- forward to study the behavior of these estimators via simula tion. This section reports some results from a simulation study that considers equal and unequal Qjs and three models for the law of the point processes. For the unequal segment length case, p= 50 and Qj= 0.1jforj= 1,... ,p and for the equal segment length case, p= 50 and each Qj= 2.55, so that Q+= 127 .5 in both cases. 21The three processes reported on here are all stationary rene wal processes; that is, the waiting times between consecutive events are iid random variables. In eac h case, the intensity of the process is 1, so that EN+= 127 .5 in all simulations. Stationary renewal processes are stra ightforward to simulate on an interval [0 ,Q]. IfFis the cdf (cumulative distribution function) for the waiti ng times and µ <∞is the mean waiting time, then to obtain a stationary process on [0,∞), use µ−1/integraltextx 0{1−F(y)}dyfor the cdf of the time of the ﬁrst event after 0 (Daley and Vere -Jones 1988, p. 107). Simulate a random variable from this distribution; if it is greater than Qthen one is done and there are no events in [0 ,Q] for this realization of the process. If not, simulate rando m waiting times with cdf Funtil one gets the ﬁrst event after Qand use the preceding events as the realization of the process on [0 ,Q]. Here, we consider waiting time densities fthat are exponential with mean 1 (in which case the Mjs are Poisson processes), f(x) = 4xe−2xforx >0 (a gamma density with parameters 2 and1 2) andf(x) = 24 /(2+x)4forx >0. Figure 3 plots K(t)−2tfor renewal processes with the last two waiting time densities, which shows that th e ﬁrst of these corresponds to a process more regular than the Poisson and the second is more clumped t han the Poisson. For the gamma waiting times, it is possible to show that for x/ne}ationslash= 0,P{M1(dx) = 1\|M1({0}) = 1}= 1−e−4xand hence that K(t) = 2t−1 2(1−e−4t). For the third waiting time density, we cannot give an analy tic expression for K(t), although Theorem 1 in Feller (1971, p. 366) implies that K(t)−2t→2 as t→ ∞. The values for K(t) in Figure 3 for this process were obtained by simulation. Si nce the mean waiting times are all equal, the variances of the waitin g times provide another measure of clumpiness with larger variances corresponding to a clumpi er process. For the exponential waiting times, the variance is 1, for the gamma case, the variance is1 2and for the last case the variance is 3. Figures 4–6 show the results of simulations for both sets of s egment lengths and all three processes. For each scenario, the three estimators were cal culated at a range of distances for 10 ,000 simulations. Generally speaking, /hatwideKRand˘KRbehave similarly and are superior to /tildewideKR, especially at longer distances when the Qjs are unequal. Figure 4 shows the mean squared errors for /hatwideKR. 22In all cases, the contributions of the squared biases to the m ean squared errors are practically negligible and are always less than 0 .5%. As expected, the mean squared errors grow with t, especially for the unequal segment length case as tgets near 5, the longest segment length available. Another expected result is that the mean squared errors incr ease with increasing clumpiness of the underlying process. Figure 5 compares /tildewideKRand/hatwideKR. We see that /hatwideKRis generally superior, although /tildewideKRis sometimes slightly better for smaller t. The relative advantage of /hatwideKR(and ˘KR) over /tildewideKR tends to be greater for more regular processes, which qualit atively agrees with the asymptotic results in Stein (1995). The advantage also tends to be great er for unequal segment lengths, demonstrating that theoretical results obtained for equal segment lengths may not accurately reﬂect the diﬀerences between estimators when segment leng ths are unequal. Figure 6 compares /hatwideKRand˘KR. From the theoretical results in the previous section, we sh ould expect these estimators to behave similarly when the waiting time density is exponen tial so that the underlying model is Poisson. The simulations show that the estimators also tend to behave very similarly for some non-Poisson models, especially when the segment lengths ar e equal. Neither estimator dominates the other, although ˘Ktends to be slightly superior for tnearly as large as the longest segment length. For highly regular processes, /hatwideKRcan be substantially inferior to either /tildewideKRor˘KRfort suﬃciently small. The problem is caused by the fact that in su ch circumstances, having a pair of events within tof each other is rare, so that var {T(φ)}is much smaller than under a Poisson model with the same intensity, whereas the variance of T(φ)−T∗(φ) =2(N+−1) Q+N+/summationdisplay j=1{h(Xj,Lj;φ)−Eh(X,L;φ)} is not much diﬀerent for a highly regular process than for a Po isson process. As a consequence, subtracting oﬀ T(φ)−T∗(φ) from T(φ) tends to inﬂate the variance of the estimator. As an example of a highly regular process, consider the stationar y renewal process with waiting time density66 5!x5e−x/6forx >0, a gamma density with parameters 6 and1 6. This waiting time 23distribution has mean 1 and variance1 6and corresponds to a highly regular point process. It is possible to show that K(t) = 2t−5 6+1 6e−12t+1 3cos(33/2t)(e−9t+e−3t) +1 31/2sin(33/2t)/parenleftbigg1 3e−9t+e−3t/parenrightbigg for this process. Figure 7 shows that /hatwideKRis notably inferior to either /tildewideKRand˘KRfortsuﬃciently small; for larger t, it is competitive with ˘KRand clearly superior to /tildewideKR. The overall winner is ˘KR, which performs well for all t. We are unaware of any circumstances in which ˘KRperforms substantially worse than either /hatwideKRor/tildewideKR. Thus, we recommend routinely using ˘KRto estimate K, although routine adoption for processes in more than one dimension will require the dev elopment of the necessary software. 7.Application to absorber catalog Figure 8 displays the estimators /tildewideKR,/hatwideKRand˘KRas applied to the absorber catalog described in Section 2. The three estimators are very similar and, as ex pected, show clear evidence of clus- tering of absorbers. To obtain some idea about the uncertain ty of these estimates, as in Quashnock and Stein (1999), approximate 95% pointwise conﬁdence inte rvals were obtained by bootstrapping using the 274 segments as the sampling units. Speciﬁcally, u sing the notation in Section 5, simu- lated absorber catalogs were produced by sampling with repl acement from ( Qj;X1j,... ,X Njj) for j= 1,... ,274, so that when one selects a segment, one automatically se lects the absorber locations that go with this segment. The conﬁdence bands displayed in F igure 8 are then what Davison and Hinkley (1997, p. 29) call the basic bootstrap conﬁdence lim its and are based on 999 simulated catalogs. All three estimators yield similar conﬁdence int ervals, which is disappointing but per- haps not unexpected given the strong clustering that exists in the absorber catalog and the ﬁnding in the simulation study that the advantage of the modiﬁcatio ns decreases as clustering increases. For these bootstrapping intervals to be appropriate, ( Qj;X1j,... ,X Njj) forj= 1,... ,274 should be iid random objects. Since the segments are of widely varyi ng lengths, if the Qjs are viewed 24as ﬁxed, the identically distributed assumption is false. H owever, if we view the Qjs as being a sequence of iid positive random variables that are indepen dent of the locations of absorbers, then the identically distributed assumption may be reasona ble. Whether or not the independence assumption is reasonable depends on the spatial extent of cl ustering among absorbers. If there is no spatial dependence in absorber locations beyond, say, 100h−1Mpc, then the independence assumption is not seriously in error, since few pairs of segm ents are within this distance of each other. If, however, nonnegligible clustering exists well b eyond 100 h−1Mpc, then the independence assumption is more problematic. Analyses of galaxy surveys (Davis and Peebles 1983, Loveday , et al. 1995) show that visible matter clusters on scales of up to 20 h−1Mpc. Thus, it is more interesting to investigate how K(t)−2tchanges at distances beyond 20 h−1Mpc than to look at Kitself. Figure 8 shows that /hatwideKR(t)−2tgenerally increases until about 200 h−1Mpc and it is important to assess the uncertainty in this pattern. Applying the bootstrapping procedure to /tildewideKR(t)−/tildewideKR(t0) fort0= 20,50,100 and 150h−1Mpc, Quashnock and Stein (1999) concluded that there was str ong evidence for clustering from 20 to 50 h−1Mpc and from 50 to 100 h−1Mpc, but at best marginal evidence for clustering beyond 100 h−1Mpc. The results with the modiﬁed estimates (not shown) conﬁ rm the clear evidence for clustering from 20 to 50 h−1Mpc and from 50 to 100 h−1Mpc. Figure 9 shows the lower bounds for pointwise 95% conﬁdence intervals for K(t)−K(100)−2(t−100). The modiﬁed estimators yield slightly stronger evidence of clustering beyond 100 h−1Mpc, which is mostly due to the fact that the modiﬁed estimates of K(t)−K(100)−2(t−100) are slightly larger than the unmodiﬁed estimates for taround 200 and not because the modiﬁed intervals are narrowe r. If one used 99% pointwise conﬁdence intervals in Figure 9, then for allt >100 and all three estimators, the lower conﬁdence bounds are negative. Thus, the conclusi on in Quashnock and Stein (1999) that there is perhaps marginal evidence for clustering beyo nd 100 h−1Mpc is not altered by using the modiﬁed estimators. 25As discussed in Section 2, the broad range of redshifts in the absorber catalog implies that we are looking at the universe at a broad range of times. The use o f comoving units largely equalizes the intensity of absorbers across redshifts, but it does not equalize the clustering. Indeed, by dividing the absorber catalog into groups based on their red shift, Quashnock and Vanden Berk (1998) found evidence that as redshift decreases, clusteri ng on the scales of 1 to 16 h−1Mpc strongly increases across the range of redshifts in the abso rber catalog. Quashnock and Vanden Berk (1998) further note that this increase in clustering wi th decreasing redshift is consistent with what is known through theory and simulations about how gravi ty should aﬀect the evolution of the clustering of absorbers over time. Using the various for ms of the rigid motion estimator of K described here on groups of the absorber catalog with simila r redshifts, we also ﬁnd that on the scale of a few tens of h−1Mpc, clustering increases substantially with decreasing r edshift over the range of redshifts in the absorber catalog (results not show n). Thus, on these shorter scales, our estimates of Kmeasure an average clustering over the range of redshifts in the absorber catalog. In contrast, Quashnock, Vanden Berk and York (1996) found no evidence that clustering at scales of 100 h−1Mpc changes over the redshift range in the absorber catalog. Similarly, when looking at, say, ˘KR(t)−˘KR(100) for t >100 based on higher and lower redshift parts of the catalog, we ﬁnd no systematic diﬀerence in the estimates as a function of redshift. For example, dividing the 274 segments in the catalog into two groups of size 137 based o n redshift, ˘KR(150)−˘KR(100) equals 150.8 for the lower redshift group and 151.4 for the higher re dshift group. Thus, we do not believe that the modest evidence we ﬁnd for clustering at these large r scales is due to inhomogeneities across time in the distribution of absorbers. 8.Summary For studying the behavior of edge-corrected estimators of t heKfunction of a point process, taking the observation domain to be a sequence of segments ha s a number of desirable consequences. First, explicit expressions are available for a number of th e more popular estimators, which is often 26not the case for regions in more than one dimension. The avail ability of such explicit expressions eases the study of the properties of these estimators via bot h theory and simulation. In addition, studying settings in which the number of segments is large yi elds results that highlight the diﬀer- ences between the various methods of edge-correction. In pa rticular, simulation results show that allowing the segment lengths to vary generally increases th e diﬀerences between estimators. The overall conclusion about the merits of the various estimato rs is that ˘KR, a modiﬁcation of the rigid motion estimator based on an approach suggested by Picka (19 96), is the estimator of choice. The absorber catalog studied here shows that multiple windo ws of varying size can arise in practice. Although it is somewhat disappointing that the bo otstrap conﬁdence intervals for the ordinary rigid motion corrected estimator and its modiﬁcat ions are very similar, this result is not too surprising in light of the simulation results showing th at the beneﬁt of the modiﬁcations is smaller for clustered processes. The simulation results in dicate that the modiﬁed estimators can have substantially smaller mean squared errors for Poisson or more regular processes, especially if the segment lengths vary substantially. Appendix. Proofs We ﬁrst derive (4) assuming, for convenience, the Qjs have been arranged in increasing order. We have 1 Q+h(x,ℓ;φR) =1 Q+p/summationdisplay j=1/integraldisplayQj 0φR/parenleftbig (x,ℓ),(y,j)/parenrightbig dy =/integraldisplayQℓ 01{\|x−y\| ≤t} U(\|x−y\|)dy =/integraldisplayx 01{\|x−y\| ≤t} U(\|x−y\|)dy+/integraldisplayQℓ x1{\|x−y\| ≤t} U(\|x−y\|)dy =/integraldisplayx 01{\|x−y\| ≤t} U(\|x−y\|)dy+/integraldisplayQℓ−x 01{\|Qℓ−x−y\| ≤t} U(\|Qℓ−x−y\|)dy. 27Thus, to verify (4), we need to show that κ(x,t) =/integraldisplayx 01{\|x−y\| ≤t} U(\|x−y\|)dy. Now /integraldisplayx 01{\|x−y\| ≤t} U(\|x−y\|)dy=/integraldisplayx (x−t)+dy U(x−y) =j(x∧t)−1/summationdisplay k=1/integraldisplayx−Qk−1 x−Qkdy/summationtextp j=k(Qj−x+y) +/integraldisplayx−Qj(x∧t)−1 (x−t)+dy/summationtextp j=j(x∧t)(Qj−x+y), which equals κ(x,t) by calculus. We next derive S2(φR), again assuming the Qjs have been arranged in increasing order. By the symmetry of φR, S2(φR) = 2Q2 +p/summationdisplay j=1/integraldisplayQj 0/integraldisplayx 01{x−y≤t} U(x−y)2dy dx, so taking v=x−yand then switching the order of integration yields S2(φR) 2Q2 +=p/summationdisplay j=1/integraldisplayQj 0/integraldisplayx∧t 01 U(v)2dv dx =p/summationdisplay j=1/integraldisplayQj∧t 0Qj−v U(v)2dv =p/summationdisplay j=1j∧{j(t)−1}/summationdisplay ℓ=1/integraldisplayQℓ Qℓ−1Qj−v/braceleftbig/summationtextp k=ℓ(Qk−v)/bracerightbig2dv+p/summationdisplay j=j(t)/integraldisplayt Qj(t)−1Qj−v/braceleftbig/summationtextp k=j(t)(Qk−v)/bracerightbig2dv =p/summationdisplay j=1j∧{j(t)−1}/summationdisplay ℓ=1/braceleftbiggQj−Qℓ (p−ℓ+ 1)Uℓ−Qj−Qℓ−1 (p−ℓ+ 1)Uℓ−1−1 (p−ℓ+ 1)2log/parenleftbiggUℓ Uℓ−1/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg +p/summationdisplay j=j(t)/bracketleftbiggQj−t {p−j(t) + 1}U(t)−Qj−Qj(t)−1 {p−j(t) + 1}Uj(t)−1−1 {p−j(t) + 1}2log/braceleftbiggU(t) Uj(t)−1/bracerightbigg/bracketrightbigg . 28Using the deﬁnition of U(t), the second sum simpliﬁes to {p−j(t) + 1}−1log{Uj(t)−1/U(t)}and by switching the order of summation and using the deﬁnition o fUℓ, the ﬁrst sum equals j(t)−1/summationdisplay ℓ=1p/summationdisplay j=ℓ/braceleftbiggQj−Qℓ (p−ℓ+ 1)Uℓ−Qj−Qℓ−1 (p−ℓ+ 1)Uℓ−1+1 (p−ℓ+ 1)2log/parenleftbiggUℓ−1 Uℓ/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg =j(t)−1/summationdisplay ℓ=1/braceleftbiggUℓ (p−ℓ+ 1)Uℓ−Uℓ−1 (p−ℓ+ 1)Uℓ−1+1 p−ℓ+ 1log/parenleftbiggUℓ−1 Uℓ/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg =j(t)−1/summationdisplay ℓ=11 p−ℓ+ 1log/parenleftbiggUℓ−1 Uℓ/parenrightbigg . Thus, S2(φR) = 2Q2 +j(t)−1/summationdisplay ℓ=11 p−ℓ+ 1log/parenleftbiggUℓ−1 Uℓ/parenrightbigg +2Q2 + p−j(t) + 1log/braceleftbiggUj(t)−1 U(t)/bracerightbigg . IfQ1=···=Qp=Q, then for t < Q,j(t) = 1, so S2(φR) =−2pQ2log/parenleftbigg 1−t Q/parenrightbigg . (17) Calculating S1(φR) is more diﬃcult and we only give the special case Q1=···=Qp=Q. Setting s=t/Q, we then have S1(φR) =p/integraldisplayQ 0/braceleftbigg/integraldisplayQ 0Q1{\|x−y\| ≤t} Q− \|x−y\|dy/bracerightbigg2 dx= 4pQ3γ(s), (18) where γis deﬁned in (11). To evaluate γ, write γ(s) =1 2/integraldisplay1 0/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplayx 01{x−y≤s} 1−x+ydy/bracketrightbigg2 dx +1 2/integraldisplay1 0/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplayx 01{x−y≤s} 1−x+ydy/bracketrightbigg/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay1 x1{z−x≤s} 1−z+xdz/bracketrightbigg dx =1 2/integraldisplay1 0log2{1−(x∧s)}dx+1 2/integraldisplay1 0log{1−(x∧s)}log{(1−s)∨x}dx. Now /integraldisplay1 0log2{1−(x∧s)}dx= 2s+ 2(1 −s) log(1 −s) 29and for s≤1 2, /integraldisplay1 0log{1−(x∧s)}log{(1−s)∨x}dx=−log2(1−s)−2slog(1−s) whereas for s >1 2, /integraldisplay1 0log{1−(x∧s)}log{(1−s)∨x}dx =−2(1−s) log(1 −s)−2slogslog(1−s) +/integraldisplays 1−slog(1−y) logy dy. Hence, γ(s) =s+ (1−2s)+log(1−s)−1/braceleftbigg s≤1 2/bracerightbigg1 2log2(1−s) −1/braceleftbigg s >1 2/bracerightbigg slogslog(1−s) +/integraldisplay(s−1/2)+ 0log/parenleftbigg1 2−y/parenrightbigg log/parenleftbigg1 2+y/parenrightbigg dy. (19) Let us next consider computing S2(φI). Deﬁning R(v) =Q+−/summationtextp j=1(2v−Qj)+, then for y < x < Q ℓwe have φI/parenleftbig(x,ℓ),(y,m)/parenrightbig=1{x−y≤t,ℓ=m}Q+ R(x−y)/bracketleftbigg1 1 + 1{2x−y < Q ℓ}+1 1 + 1{2y−x >0}/bracketrightbigg . Thus, taking v=x−y, S2(φI) 2Q2 +=p/summationdisplay ℓ=1/integraldisplayQℓ 0/integraldisplayx 01{x−y≤t} R(x−y)2/bracketleftbigg1 1 + 1{2x−y < Q ℓ}+1 1 + 1{2y−x >0}/bracketrightbigg2 dy dx =p/summationdisplay ℓ=1/integraldisplayQℓ 0/integraldisplayx∧t 01 R(v)2/bracketleftbigg1 1 + 1{x+v < Q ℓ}+1 1 + 1{x >2v}/bracketrightbigg2 dv dx =p/summationdisplay ℓ=1/integraldisplayt∧Qℓ 01 R(v)2/integraldisplayQℓ v/bracketleftbigg1 1 + 1{x+v < Q ℓ}+1 1 + 1{x >2v}/bracketrightbigg2 dxdv. Now [1+1 {x+v < Q ℓ}]−1+[1+1 {x >2v}]−1takes on values 2,3 2and 1 depending on, respectively, whether none, one or both of x+v < Q ℓandx >2vare true. Thus, S2(φI) 2Q2 +=p/summationdisplay ℓ=1/braceleftigg/integraldisplayt∧1 3Qℓ 09 42v+ 1(Qℓ−3v) R(v)2dv 30+/integraldisplayt∧1 2Qℓ t∧1 3Qℓ9 4(2Qℓ−4v) + 4(3 v−Qℓ) R(v)2dv+/integraldisplayt∧Qℓ t∧1 2Qℓ4(Qℓ−v) R(v)2dv/bracerightigg =p/summationdisplay ℓ=1/braceleftigg/integraldisplayt∧1 3Qℓ 0Qℓ+3 2v R(v)2dv+/integraldisplayt∧1 2Qℓ t∧1 3Qℓ1 2Qℓ+ 3v R(v)2dv+/integraldisplayt∧Qℓ t∧1 2Qℓ4(Qℓ−v) R(v)2dv/bracerightigg . While it is possible to evaluate these integrals explicitly , the resulting expressions do not appear to simplify as in the case for the rigid motion estimat or. When Q1=···=Qp=Q, we do obtain a fairly simple explicit result. By taking u=v/Q, we get S2(φI) = 2pQ2/bracketleftigg/integraldisplays∧1 3 01 +3 2u {1−(2u−1)+}2du+/integraldisplays∧1 2 s∧1 31 2+ 3u {1−(2u−1)+}2du +/integraldisplays s∧1 24−4u {1−(2u−1)+}2du/bracketrightigg = 2pQ2/braceleftigg/integraldisplays∧1 3 0(1 +3 2u)du+/integraldisplays∧1 2 s∧1 3/parenleftbigg1 2+ 3u/parenrightbigg du+/integraldisplays s∧1 21 1−udu/bracerightigg , so that for s=t/Q < 1, S2(φI) = 2pQ2×  s+3 4s2if 0< s≤1 3, 1 12+1 2s+3 2s2if1 3≤s≤1 2and 17 24−log 2−log(1−s) if1 2≤s <1.(20) References Baddeley, A. (1998). Spatial sampling and censoring. In Stochastic Geometry: Likelihood and Computation (O. E. Barndorﬀ-Nielsen, W. S. Kendall and M. N. M. van Liesho ut, eds.) Chapter 2. Chapman and Hall, London. Baddeley, A. and Gill, R. D. (1997). Kaplan-Meier estimator s of distance distributions for spatial point processes. Ann. Statist. 25263–292. Baddeley, A. J., Moyeed, R. A., Howard, C. V. and Boyde, A. (19 93). Analysis of a three- dimensional point pattern with replication. Appl. Statist. 42641–668. 31Coleman, P. H. and Pietronero, L. (1992). The fractal struct ure of the universe. Phys. Reports 213311–389. Crotts, A. P. S., Melott, A. L. and York, D. G. (1985). QSO meta l-line absorbers: the key to large-scale structure? Phys. Letters B 155B 251–254. Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (1988). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Springer-Verlag, New York. Davis, M. and Peebles, P. J. E. (1983). A survey of galaxy reds hifts. V. The two-point position and velocity correlations. Astrophys. J. 267465–482. Davison, A. C. and Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cam- bridge University Press. Feller, W. (1971). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , vol. II. Wiley, New York. Hamilton, A. J. S. (1993). Toward better ways to measure the g alaxy correlation function. Astrophys. J. 41719–35. Jing, Y. P. and Suto, Y. (1998). Confronting cold dark matter cosmologies with strong clustering of Lyman break galaxies at z∼3.Astrophys. J. 494L5–L8. Landy, S. L. and Szalay, A. S. (1993). Bias and variance of ang ular correlation functions. Astrophys. J. 41264–71. Lanzetta, K. M., Bowen, D. B., Tytler. D. and Webb, J. K. (1995 ). The gaseous extent of galaxies and the origin of Lyman-alpha absorption systems: A survey of galaxies in the ﬁelds of Hubble Space Telescope spectroscopic target QSOs. Astrophys. J. 442538–568. Loveday, J., Maddox, S. J., Efstathiou, G. and Peterson, B. A . (1995). The Stromlo-APM redshift survey. II. Variation of galaxy clustering with mo rphology and luminosity. Astrophys. J. 442457–468. Margon, B. (1999). The Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 35793-103. 32Mart´ ınez, V. J. (1997). Recent advances in large-scale str ucture statistics. In Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy II (G. J. Babu and E. D. Feigelson, eds.) 153–166. Springer, New York. Ohser, J. (1983). On estimators for the reduced second momen t measure of point processes. Math. Oper. Statist. ser Statist. 1463–71. Ohser, J. and Stoyan, D. (1981). On the second-order and orie ntation analysis of planar stationary point processes. Biom. J. 23523–533. Peebles, P. J. E. (1993). Principles of Physical Cosmology . Princeton University Press. Picka, J. (1996). Variance-reducing modiﬁcations for esti mators of dependence in random sets. Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Statistics, Unive rsity of Chicago. Pons-Border´ ıa, M.-J., Mart´ ınez, V. J., Stoyan, D., Stoya n, H. and Saar, E. (1999). Compar- ing estimators of the galaxy correlation function. Astrophys. J. 523480–491. Quashnock, J. M. and Stein, M. L. (1999). A measure of cluster ing of QSO heavy-element absorption-line systems. Astrophys. J. 515506–511. Quashnock, J. M. and Vanden Berk, D. E. (1998). The form and ev olution of the clustering of QSO heavy-element absorption-line systems. Astrophys. J. 50028–36. Quashnock, J. M., Vanden Berk, D. E. and York, D. G. (1996). Hi gh-redshift superclustering of quasi-stellar object absorption-line systems on 100 h−1Mpc scales. Astrophys. J. 472L69-L72. Ripley, B. D. (1988). Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Dickinson, M., Giavalisc o, M. Pettini, M. and Kellogg, M. (1998). A large structure of galaxies at redshift z∼3 and its cosmological implications. Astrophys. J.492428–438. Stein, M. L. (1993). Asymptotically optimal estimation for the reduced second moment measure of point processes. Biometrika 80443–449. 33Stein, M. L. (1995). An approach to asymptotic inference for spatial point processes. Statist. Sinica 5221–234. Stoyan, D. and Stoyan, H. (2000). Improving ratio estimator s of second order point process characteristics. Scand. J. Statist. in press. Sylos Labini, F., Montuori, M. and Pietronero, L. (1998). Sc ale-invariance of galaxy cluster- ing.Phys. Reports 29361–226. Vanden Berk, D. E., Quashnock, J. M., York, D. G., Yanny, B. (1 996). An excess of C IV absorbers in luminous quasars: evidence for gravitational lensing? Astrophys. J. 46978–83. York, D. G., Yanny, B., Crotts, A., Carilli, C., Garrison, E. and Matheson, L. (1991). An inhomogeneous reference catalogue of identiﬁed interveni ng heavy element systems in spectra of QSOs. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 25024–49. Zhang, Y., Meiksin, A., Anninos, P. and Norman, M. L. (1998). Physical properties of the Lyαforest in cold dark matter cosmology. Astrophys. J. 49563–79. 34353637383940414243
arXiv:physics/0006048v1 [physics.gen-ph] 20 Jun 2000Issues in Quantized Fractal Space Time B.G. Sidharth Centre for Applicable Mathematics & Computer Sciences B.M. Birla Science Centre, Hyderabad 500 063 Abstract In recent years, the picture of discrete space time has been s tudied in the context of stochastic theory. There are a number of ram iﬁ- cations, which are brieﬂy examined. We argue that the causal ity of physiics has its roots in the analyticity within the two dime nsons of a fractal quantum path and further show how this picture has co nver- gence wth quantum superstrings. 1 Introduction The concept of a discrete space time was formulated over ﬁfty years ago by Schild, Snyder and others[1, 2]. It has survived over the yea rs with varia- tions through the works of Caldirola, Lee, Bombelli et al., W olfe, the author and others ([3]-[11]). Infact, space time points imply inﬁn ite energies and momenta, but Quantum Theory has lived with this self contrad iction[12]. Devices like renormalization have therefore to be invoked. A second approach which avoids the diﬃculties of both the cla ssical smooth and the discrete theory is that pioneered by Ord, Nottalee an d El Naschie[54]- [56]. Those authors assume the existence of a transﬁnite Can tor-like space time Manifold E(∞). This concept is also implicit in Dirac’s relativistic theor y of the electron [13]: Physically meaningful solutions arise only at and above the Compton scale. Below it we have the zitterbewegung eﬀects. Recently the author has pointed out that the electron can be f ruitfully de- scribed with a Kerr-Newman metric, avoiding a naked singula rity by invoking 1a discrete space time structure, which can be further pushed forward in the context of a stochastic and fractal theory[14]-[18]. Such a formulation leads to a uniﬁcation of electromagnetism and gravitation, and al so shows up a cosmology consistent with the large number relations and re cent observa- tions, apart from providing a rationale for many other appar ently ad hoc features. We will now brieﬂy examine the above formulation a nd some of its ramiﬁcations. 2 The Kerr-Newman Formulation It is well known that the Kerr-Newman metric describes the ﬁe ld of an elec- tron including the anomalous gyro magnetic ratio g= 2 [19] except that there is an inadmissable naked singularity: The radius of th e horizon for the electron is given, in the usual notation by r+=GM c2+ıb,b≡/parenleftBiggG2Q2 c8+a2−G2M2 c4/parenrightBigg1/2 (1) It is to be noticed that the imaginary part of the radius in the above equa- tion can be immediately identiﬁed with the imaginary part of the position operator of a Dirac electron, viz., x= (c2p1H−1t+a1) +ı 2c¯h(α1−cp1H−1)H−1, (2) The imaginary part in (26) gives the zitterbewegung and vani shes on averag- ing over Compton scales. It has been stressed[14, 15] that th e Compton scale represents a minimum space time cut oﬀ, below which there is n o meaningful physics. Physics emerges on averaging over these scales. These minimum cut oﬀ scales have been shown to arise due to a st ochastic underpinning [20, 21]. Indeed they give a meaning to Nelsoni an and other stochastic studies [22]-[25]. All this is symptomatic of a b ackground Zero Point Field or Quantum Vacuum which is the underpinning for t he universe. The above Kerr-Newman formulation of the electron becomes m ore mean- ingful in a linearised General Relativistic context, where we have, gµv=ηµv+hµv,hµv=/integraldisplay4Tµv(t− \|/vector x−/vector x′\|,/vector x′) \|/vector x−/vector x′\|d3x′(3) 2The justiﬁcation for the linearized theory is that even at th e Compton scale of the electron ∼10−11cmswe are well outside the Schwarzchild radius of an electron ∼10−56cms[26] so that the linearized theory is applicable. Starting from (27) it has been shown that the correct spin, charge, gyr o magnetic ratio, and infact the Kerr Newman metric itself can be obtained. Thi s metric gives both the gravitational and the electromagnetic ﬁelds, and i t has been shown that this is symptomatic of and leads to the desired uniﬁcati on of gravitation and electromagnetism. The formulation is on the face of it si milar to Weyl’s original theory, except that what is crucial is the purely Qu antum Mechanical spinorial behaviour of the electron. Indeed the electromag netic potential is given by Aµ= ¯hΓµσ σ= ¯h∂ ∂xµlog(/radicalBig \|g\|) which is apparently similar to the Weyl theory, except that t his time the term is not put in ad hoc as in the Weyl formulation, but rather aris es naturally due to the pseudo spinorial behaviour of the negative energy two component spinorχof the Dirac four spinor/parenleftBigg Θ χ/parenrightBigg . All this has been discussed in detail in the references[14, 15, 16]. Further at the Compton scale one gets a characterisation of t he quark pic- ture including such peculiar features as the fractional cha rge, handedness and conﬁnement[18, 27, 20]. A crucial input here is the fact t hat while the usual three dimensionality arises well outside the Compton scale due to spin networks[19, 28], at the Compton scale itself we encounter l ower dimension- ality. Indeed, in the closely related non-Quantum Mechanic al relativistic theory of particles [29], the centres of mass form a two dimen sional disc within the analogue of the Compton scale. We also get a characterisation of the neutrino and weak inter action[30]. In- deed in the above model the Compton wavelength of the neutrin o becomes inﬁnite as its mass vanishes and so the divide between the neg ative energy spinors and the positive energy spinors of the four spinor as in the case of the electron disappears, and along with it the double connec tivitity of space also. This immediately leads to the handedness of the neutri no [14]. Infact the neutrino is the divide between the Fermionic and the Boso nic particle. 33 Cosmology It is easy to see how the Kerr-Newman type electrons, or more g enerally elementary particles can be formed out of a background Zero P oint Field. As is known the energy of the ﬂuctuations of the magnetic ﬁeld in a region of lengthλis[19] B2∼¯hc λ4(4) whereBto the left side of (28) denotes the magnitude of the magnetic ﬁeld. Ifλis the Compton wavelength, then the right side ∼mc2, that is the whole particle can be created out of the background Zero Poin t Field. In what follows we take a pion to be a typical elementary particl e, as in the literature, its mass being m. As there are N∼1080particles in the universe, we should then have Nm=M, (5) whereM∼1056gmsis the mass of the universe. This is indeed so. We can next deduce using the ZPF spectral density, the relati on (cf.ref.[15]), MαR whereRis the radius of the universe. This is quite correct and in- fact poses a puzzle, as is well known and it is to resolve this d ependence that dark matter has been postulated whereas in our formulat ion the correct mass radius dependence has emerged quite naturally. Other i nteresting and consistent consequences follow from the facts that the pion energy equals its gravitational energy and that√ Nparticles are ﬂuctuationally created in Compton time τ: GM c2=R,√ N=2mπc2 ¯h.T (6) whereTis the age of the universe ≈1017secs, and, H=Gm3 πc ¯h2, (7) It is remarkable that equation (7) is known to be true from a pu rely empirical standpoint and is considered mysterious. Remembering that we are dealing with order of magnitude relations, we can deduce from (6) and (7) that d2R dt2= ΛRwhere Λ ≤0(H2) (8) 4That is, a small cosmological constant cannot be ruled out. E quation (8) explains the puzzling fact that, if Λ exists, why is it so smal l[31]. To proceed we observe that the ﬂuctuation of ∼√ Nin the number of particles leads to √ N=e2 Gm2≈1040, whence we get, R=√ Nl,Gm lc2=1√ N,G∝T−1, (9) as also the fact that ˙G/G∼1 T, in reasonably good agreement [32]. Further, from the above we can deduce that the charge eis independant of time orN. Infact we can treat m(orl),cand¯has the only microphysical constants and Nas the only cosmological parameter, given which all other parameters and constants follow. We can now easily deduce from (6), (7) and (8), the following: ρ∝T−1,Λ≤0(T−2), (10) In our model the equation (6) actually provides an arrow of ti me, in terms of the particle number N. Further, the cosmic background radiation can be explained in terms of ﬂuctuations of interstellar Hydrog en[33]. In this model the universe continues to expand for ever with accordi ng to (10) de- creasing density (unlike in the Steady State model). Indeed the fact that the universe would continue to expand for ever has since been obs ervationally conﬁrmed[34, 35]. Moreover, using (9) we can deduce the well known eﬀects of General Relativity namely the precession of the periheli on of mercury, the gravitational bending of light, a recently observed anomal ous inward acceler- ation in the solar system and the ﬂattened galactic rotation al curves without invoking dark matter[36, 30]. It may also be remarked that a b ackground Zero Point Field does indeed show up as a cosmological consta nt, as has been shown in (Cf.ref.[30]). 4 Other Consequences 54.1 Weak Interactions These can be characterised in terms of the semionic or anomal ous statistics of the neutrino, as noted in Section 2. Using this we can deduc e that mνc2 k≈√ 3T (11) At the present background temperature of about 2◦K, this gives a neutrino mass 10−9me≤mν≤10−8me (12) wheremeis the electron rest mass. It is remarkable that (11) is exact ly what is required to be deduced theoretically to justify recent mo dels of lepton conservation or in certain uniﬁcation schemes. We now obser ve that the balance of the gravitational force and the Fermi energy of th e cold background neutrinos, gives[37] GNνm2 ν R=N2/3 ν¯h2 mνR2, whence,Nν∼1090 whereNνis the number of neutrinos, as indeed is known. If the new weak force is mediated by an intermediate particle of massM and Compton wavelength L, we will get from the ﬂuctuation of the particle numberNν, on using (12), g2/radicalBig NνL2≈mνc2∼10−14, (13) From (13), on using the value of Nν, we get,g2L2∼10−59 This agrees with experiment and the theory of massless parti cles the neu- trino speciﬁcally acquiring mass due to interaction[38], u sing the usual value ofM∼100Gev. Additionally there could be a long range force also, a ”weak e lectromag- netism” with coupling ¯ g. This time, in place of (13), we would have, ¯g2√Nν R≈10−8mνc2(14) Comparing (14) with a similar equation for the electron, we g et[30], ¯g2/e2∼10−13 6so that in eﬀect the neutrino will appear with an ”electric ch arge” a little less than a millionth that of the electron. Interestingly from an alternative perspective [39], it can be concluded that the cosmological Neutrino background can mediate long rang e forces ∼1 r2 forr<<1 Tand∼1 r6forr>>1 T. In any case using the value of the Neutrino ”electrical” char ge and treating it like a Kerr-Newman black hole, as in the case of the electro n it is easy to deduce a magnetic moment for it: We start with the relation[15] ¯h∼Gm2√ N c , wheremis the electron mass. For the neutrino mass as given in (12) an d particle number Nν, the above becomes, ¯h′∼10−12¯h, which is symptomatic of the bosonic (or spin zero) behaviour of the neutrino. Using this value ¯ h′instead of ¯h, and the neutrino ”electric” charge and mass as given above, we can deduce that its magnetic moment is give n by µν∼10−11Bohr magnetrons Indeed, this is in agreement with known values [40]. 4.2 Discrete Space-time Eﬀects Within the above scheme, the neutral pion has been exhibited as a bound state of an electron and a positron. At ﬁrst sight one would ex pect that such a bound state would cause pair annihilation and would lead to t he appearance of two photons. However the existence of such a bound state is an imprint of discrete space time as can be seen by the following argumen t: In this case the the Schrodinger equation is given by (Cf. also [4]) HφT =EφT=φıh[T(t+τ/2)−T(t−τ/2) τ] (15) whereφis the space part and Tis the time part of the wave function and τis the minimum unit, the Compton time. From (15) one can deduc e that 7the most excited stable state appears at the critical value E∼¯h τ∼mc2 which is ofcourse the pion energy. It must be pointed out that the decay mode of the pion bears out these arguments. Thus the existence of the pion as a bound state of an electron a nd a poistron due to discrete space time is similar to the original Bohr orb its, at the birth of Quantum Mechanics, as will be seen below. In the same vein, it was argued that the Kaon decay puzzle, whe rein time reversibility is violated, could be explained on similar li nes[41]. Let us now consider the eﬀect more closely. Indeed it has been shown tha t the discrete- ness leads to a non commutative geometry [20] viz., [x,y] = 0(l2),[x,px] =ı¯h[1−l2] (16) and similar equations. If terms ∼l2are neglected we get back the usual Quantum Theory. However if we retain these terms, then we can deduce the Dirac equation. Moreover it can be seen that given (16) sp ace rerlection symmetry no longer holds. This violation is an O(l2) eﬀect. This is not surprising. It has already been pointed out [42] t hat the space time divide viz., x+ıctarises due to the zitterbewegung or double Weiner process in the Compton wavelength - and in this derivation te rms∼(ct)2∼l2 were neglected. However if these terms are retained, then we get a correction to the usual theory including special relativity. To see this more clearly let us (Cf.ref.[14, 43]) as a ﬁrst app roximation treat the continuum as a series of discrete points separated by a di stancel, which then leads to Ea(xn) =E0a(xn)−Aa(xn+l)−Aa(xn−l) (17) Whenlis made to tend to zero, it was shown that from (17) we recover t he Schrodinger equation, and further, we have, E=E0−2Acoskl. (18) The zero of energy was chosen such that E= 2A=mc2, the rest energy of the particle (Cf.[14]), in the limit l→0. However if we retain terms ∼l2, 8then from (18) we will have instead /vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleE mc2−1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle∼0(l2) The above shows the correction to the energy mass formula, wh ere again we recover the usual formula in the limit O(l2)≈0. It must be mentioned that all this would be true in principle f or discrete space time, even if the minimum cut oﬀ was not at the Compton sc ale. Intuitively this should be obvious: Space time reﬂection sy mmetries are based on a space time continuum picture. 4.3 A Mass Spectrum It is possible to obtain the masses of diﬀerent elementary pa rticles by con- sidering them to be suitable bound states of the leptons, on t he basis of their decay modes, in the context of the above picture[44]. For example a proton could be considered to be a bound state of two positrons and a central electron[17, 18]. In this case we recover the co rrect mass of the proton,mP. There is also a string of excited states with masses (2 n+ 1)mP. It is quite remarkable that the Ω cbaryon has a mass nearly 3 mP, after which there is a big gap and the next baryon viz., Λ vhas a mass 5 mP. Similarly other shortlived baryons whose masses are odd multiples of t he proton masses can be expected. Taking into account the rotational degrees of freedom, it is possible to get an additional mass spectrum(Cf.ref.[44]) viz., mc2=2(n+ 1/2)¯hω 1−5 6k2, where forn= 0 andk= 0, ¯hω=mPc2. Fork= 1 this then gives a mass six times that of a proton and so on we can generate a series of mass es. 4.4 The Magnetic Eﬀects If the electron is indeed a Kerr-Newman type charged black ho le, it can be approximated by a solenoid and we could expect an Aharonov-B ohm type 9of eﬀect, due to the vector potential /vectorAwhich would give rise to shift in the phase in a two slit experiment for example [45]. This shift is given by ∆δˆB=e ¯h/contintegraldisplay /vectorA./vectords (19) while the shift due to the electric charge would be ∆δˆE=−e ¯h/integraldisplay A0dt (20) whereA0is the electrostatic potential. In the above formulation (C f.ref.[46],. we would have /vectorA∼1 cA0 (21) Substitution of (21) in (19) and (20) shows that the magnetic eﬀect∼v c times the electric eﬀect. Further, the magnetic component of a Kerr-Newman black hole , as is well known [19] is given by Bˆr=2ea r3cosΘ + 0(1 r4),BˆΘ=easinΘ r3+ 0(1 r4),Bˆφ= 0, (22) while the electrical part is Eˆr=e r2+ 0(1 r3),EˆΘ= 0(1 r4),Eˆφ= 0, (23) Equations (22) and (23) show that in addition to the usual dip ole magnetic ﬁeld, there is a shorter range magnetic ﬁeld given by terms ∼1 r4. In this context it is interesting to note that an extra B(3)magnetic ﬁeld of shorter range and mediated by massive photons has indeed been observ ed and studied over the past few years[47]. 4.5 Uniﬁcation of Fluctuations It is quite remarkable that in the preceding considerations , we get the grav- itational and electromagnetic interactions as also the wea k interaction from ﬂuctuation in the particle number ∼√Nνor√ N, for example in the equa- tions leading to (9) or (13). It is thus the ﬂuctuation or what has been characterised as non local eﬀects that underlie all the inte ractions[48] and lead to a uniﬁed picture. It is interesting that El Naschie’s ﬂuctuon is very much in this spirit[49]. 104.6 Fractal Matter It has been remarked earlier that as we approach the Compton w avelength, there is a change in dimensionality - we go to two and one dimen sions. Such a low dimensional behaviour leads to fractional charges and s uperconductivity type eﬀects[50, 51, 52]. It is indeed pleasing that experime nts with car- bon nano tubes already indicate such phenomenon. Thiis type of behaviour should be exhibited by quarks also. 4.7 Miscellaneous Matters a) The discrete space time or zitterbewegung has an underpin ning that is stochastic. The picture leads to the goal of Wheeler’s ’law w ithout law’ [53, 20, 21]. Furthermore the picture that emerges is machia n. This is evi- dent from equations like (6), (7) and (9)– the micro depends o n the macro. So the ﬁnal picture that emerges is on of stochastic holism. b) Another way of expressing the above point is by observing t hat the in- teractions are relational. For example, in the equation lea ding to (9), if the number of particles in the universe tends to 1, then the gravi tational and electromagnetic interactions would be equal, this happeni ng at the Planck scale, where the Compton wavelength equals the Schwarzchil d radius[54, 55]. c) Infact as shown [42], when Nthe number of particles in the universe is 1 we have a Planck particle with a short life time ∼10−42secsdue to the Hawking radiation but with N∼1080particles as in the present universe we have the pion as the typical particle with a stable life time ∼of the age of the universe due to the Hagedorn on radiation. d) It is well known that there are 18 arbitrary parameters in c ontemporary physics. We on the other hand have been working with the micro physical constants referred to earlier viz., the electron (or pion) m ass or Compton wavelength, the Planck constant, the fundamental unit of ch arge and the velocity of light. These along with the number of particles Nas the only free parameter can generate the mass, radius and age of the univer se as also the Hubble constant. If we closely look at the equation leading to (9) giving the gr avitational and electromagnetic strength ratios, we can actually deduce th e relation, l=e2 mc2(24) 11In other words we have deduced the pion mass in terms of the ele ctron mass, or, given the pion mass and the electron mass, we have de duced the ﬁne structure constant. From the point of view of the order of magnitude theory in which the distinction between the electron, pion a nd proton gets blurred, what equation (24) means is, that the Planck consta nt itself depends oneandc(andm). Further in the Kerr-Newman type characterisation of the electron, the charge eis really equivalent to the spinorial tensor density (N= 1), Cf.ref.[14]. In this sense ealso is pre determined and we are left with a minimum length viz. the Compton length and a minumum time vi z. the Compton time (or a maximal velocity c) as the only fundamental constants. References [1] Schild, A., Physical Review, 73, 1948, 414-415. [2] Snyder, H.S., Phys. Rev. 71(1), 1947, 38ﬀ. [3] Kadyshevskii, V.G., Soviet Physics Doklady 7(11), 1963, 1030. [4] Wolf C., Nuovo. Cim. B 109 (3), 1994, 213. [5] Caldirola, P., Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento, Vol.16, N.5, 19 76, 151ﬀ. [6] Kadyshevskii, V.G., Soviet Physics Doklady 7(12), 1963, 1138ﬀ. [7] Wolfe, C., Hadronic Journal 15, 321-332 (1992) and several references therein. [8] Bombelli, L., Lee, J., Meyer, D., Sorkin, R.D., Phys. Rev . Lett. 59, 1987, 521. [9] El Naschie, M.S., Nottale, L., AlAthl, S., Ord, G., Fract al space- time and Cantorian geometry in quantum mechanics, Chaos, Solito ns and Fractals, 1996, 7 (6). [10] Lee, T.D., Phys. Lett. 12 (2B), 1983, 217. [11] Isham, C.J., Kubyshin, Y., and Renteln, P., Class.Quan tum Grav. (1990), 7, 1053-1074. 12[12] Peat, F.D., ”Super Strings and the Search for the Theory of Everything”, Abacus, London, 1992. [13] Dirac, P.A.M., ”Principles of Quantum Mechanics”, Cla rendon Press, Oxford, 1958. [14] Sidharth, B.G., Ind. J. Pure and Applied Phys., 35 (7), 1 997, 456. [15] Sidharth, B.G., IJMPA, 13 (15), 1998, 2599. Also xxx.la nl.gov quant-ph 9808031. [16] Sidharth, B.G., Gravitation and Cosmology 4(2) (14), 158ﬀ (1998) and references therein. [17] Sidharth, B.G., Mod.Phys. Lett. A., Vol. 12 No.32, 1997 , pp2469-2471. [18] Sidharth, B.G., Mod.Phys. Lett. A., Vol. 14 No. 5, 1999, pp387-389. [19] Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., and Wheeler, J.A., Gravitation , (Freeman ,San Francisco 1973). [20] Sidharth, B.G., Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 11 (8), 2 000, 1269-1278. [21] Sidharth, B.G., Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 11 (8), 2 000, 1171-1174. [22] Nelson, E., Phys. Rev., (1966) 150, pg.1079ﬀ. [23] Hakim, R., J. Math. Phys., (1968) 9, pg.1805ﬀ. [24] Gaveau, B., et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett., (1984) 53 (5), pg. 419ﬀ. [25] Lehr, W.J., and Park, L.J., J.Math.Phys., (1977) 18(6) , 1235ﬀ. [26] Ohanian, Hans C., and Ruﬃni, R., ”Gravitation and Space time”, New York, 1994. [27] Sidharth, B.G., in Instantaneous Action at a Distance i n Modern Physics: ”Pro and Contra” , Eds., A.E. Chubykalo et. al., Nov a Sci- ence Publishing, New York, 1999. [28] Penrose, R., ”Angular Momentum: An approach to combina tional space-time” in, ”Quantum Theory and Beyond”, Ed., Bastin, T ., Cam- bridge University press, Cambridge, 1971. 13[29] Moller, C., ”The Theory of Relativity”, Clarendon Pres s, Oxford, 1952, pp.170 ﬀ. [30] Sidharth, B.G., ”From the Neutrino to the Edge of the Uni verse”, to appear in Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. [31] Weinberg, S., Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol.61, No.1, January 1989, p.1-23. [32] Fortini, P., Gualdi, C., Masini, S., and Ortolan, A., Il Nuovo Cimento, Vol. 108 B, N.4, 1993, 459ﬀ. [33] Sidharth, B.G., Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 11 (2000 ) 1471-72. [34] Perlmutter, S., et. al., Nature, 391 (6662), 1998. [35] Kirshner, R.P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Vol.96, 1999, pp .4224-4227. [36] Sidharth, B.G., ”Eﬀects of Varying G” to appear in Nuovo Cimento B. [37] Hayakawa, S., Suppl of PTP, 1965, 532-541. [38] Sivaram, C., Am.J.Phys., (1983) 51(3), 277. [39] Horowitz, C.J. and Pantaleone, J., Physics Letters B, B 319, 1993, p.186- 190. [40] Mohapatra Rabindra N., Pal Palash, B., ”Massive Neutri nos in Physics and Astrophysics”, World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1998. [41] Sidharth, B.G., Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 11 (8), 2 000, 1171-1174. [42] Sidharth, B.G., ”Space Time as a Random Heap”, to appear in Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. [43] Feynman, R.P., ”The Feynman Lectures on Physics”, (Vol .2), Addison- Wesley, Mass, 1965. [44] Sidharth, B.G., and Lobanov, Yu Yu, Proceedings of Fron tiers of Fun- damental Physics, (Eds.)B.G. Sidharth, B.G., and Burinski i, A., Uni- versities Press, Hyderabad, 1999. 14[45] Aharonov, Y., ”Non-Local Phenomena and the Aharonov-B ohm Eﬀect” in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time (Eds.) R. Penrose, C.J. Isham, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986, pp.41ﬀ. [46] Sidharth, B.G., ”Brief Note on Magnetic Eﬀect of the Ele ctron”, xxx.lanl.gov/phys/0004050. [47] Evans, M.W., ”Origin, Observation and Consequences of theB(3)Field” in The Present Status of the Quantum Theory of Light, S. Jeﬀer s et al. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1997, pp. 117-125 and several other references therein. [48] Sidharth, B.G., ”Comments on the Paper ’On the Uniﬁcati on of the Fundamental Forces...’”, to appear in Chaos, Solitons and F ractals. [49] El Naschie, M.S., ”On the uniﬁcation of the fundamental forces and complex time in E(∞).Space, Chaos Solitons and Fractals, Vol. 11 No.7 June 2000, pp1149-1162. [50] Sidharth, B.G., Journal of Statistical Physics, 95(3/ 4), May 1999. [51] Sidharth, B.G., ”Low Dimensional Electrons”, Solid St ate Physics, Eds., R.Mukhopadhyay et al., 41, Universities Press, Hyderabad, 1999, p.331. [52] Sidharth, B.G., ”Quantum Mechanical Black Holes: An Al ternative Per- spective”, (1998) in ”Frontiers of Quantum Physics”, Eds., Lim, S.C., et al, Springer- Verlag, Singapore. [53] Wheeler, J.A., Am.J.Phys., (1983) 51 (5), pg.398ﬀ. [54] El Naschie, M.S., Towards a geometrical theory for the u niﬁcation of all fundamental forces, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 2000, 11 (9), 1459-69. [55] Castro, C., Is quantum space time inﬁnite dimensional, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol.11 No.11 September 2000, pp1663-1670. [56] Argyris, J., Fractal space signaturee in quantum physi cs, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol.11 No.11, September 2000, pp1671-1719. 15APPENDIX A Brief Note on Analyticity and Causality, and the ”Levels of Physics” In previous communications[1, 2] it was argued that within t he Compton wavelength of a fractal Brownian path the one dimensional co ordinatexbe- comes complex. That is xbecomesx+ıx′where, further it was shown that x′=ct,and it was argued that this is the origin of Special Relativit y. It is relevant to mention that complex time has also been consid ered by El Naschie[3, 4]. Within the Compton scale we have a Hawking-Hartle[5] situat ion, where time becomes imaginary and static - in these regions space ti me can be rep- resented by the compact rotation group. This is also from the point of view of ordinary space-time, the unphysical zitterbewegung regio n, and as Dirac[6] pointed out, physics begins after an integration over this r egion. Outside the Compton scale however, which is our physical domain[7], we have the Minkowski metric. Interestingly it was argued[1] that the above consideratio n was also at the root of the complex wave function of Quantum Mechanics, whic h diﬀerenci- ates it from classical physics. Infact if we take the Quantum Mechanical wave function to be the carrier of as much physical information of the state as is possible then we can argue that because the ﬁrst time derivat ive of the wave function is then not required, unlike in classical theory, w here position and velocity are independantly required, it is necessary that t he wave function be complex in order to preserve causality[8]. Indeed if the wav e function were real, we would have a stationary picture with a constant prob ability current. Within the Compton scale, that is in the domain of the Hawking -Hartle static timet′, we have x2+y2+z2+c2+t′2= invariant (25) Further, analyticity demands the Cauchy-Reimann equation s which lead to, in this case, the Laplacian operator equation, /bracketleftBigg ∇2+1 c2∂2 ∂t′2/bracketrightBigg ψ= 0 (26) However, when we cross over to the domain of our usual physics , ﬁrstlyt′goes over toıt, wheretis our physical time. Secondly the region of analyticity 16in our physical world is the region outside the Compton wavel ength, and excludes the region within which is the unphysical zitterbe wegung region of non local or superluminal eﬀects (Cf.[6]). So as Dirac point ed out, after the integration over the unphysical Compton scale, and remembe ring that, ψ=√ρeıS, whereρis the probability density of x(t), so that an integration of ψψ∗over the Compton region gives the mass, we get, instead of (25) and (26), x2+y2+z2−c2t2= invariant (27) 2ψ=mc2ψ (28) Equation (27) is the Minkowski metric while equation (28) ca n be easily recognised as the Klein-Gordon equation. There is another way to derive the D’Alembertian in (28). For this we use (27), along with the fact that, precisely due to the double We iner process at the Compton scale, referred to above, as pointed out by Not tale[9] the energy momentum operators are given by /parenleftBigg¯h ı/vector∇,¯h ı∂ ∂t/parenrightBigg Thus causality in the physical world as expressed by (27) or ( 28) is related to analyticity within the unphysical Compton region. We next observe that as above, the discretization at the Comp ton scale leads to the commutation relations[10, 11]: [x,px] =ı¯h[1−l2] (29) Equation (29) implies a correction to the usual uncertainit y relation, due to the minimum space-time cut oﬀ. This is exactly the case in Q uantum superstrings[12, 13]. There also, due to duality, a minimum cut oﬀ emerges and we have the equation (29). What we would like to point out is that we are seeing here diﬀer ent levels of physics. Indeed, rewriting (29) as, [x,ux] =ı[l−l3], 17we can see that if l= 0, we have classical physics, while if 0( l3) = 0,we have Quantum Mechanics and ﬁnally if 0( l3)∝negationslash= 0 we have the above discussed fractal picture, and from another point of view, the superst ring picture. Interestingly, in our case the electron Compton wavelength l∼1011cm,so that 0(l3)∼10−33as in string theory. References [1] Sidharth, B.G., ”Space Time as a Random Heap”, to appear i n Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. [2] Sidharth, B.G.,”An Underpinning for Space Time”, to app ear in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. [3] El Naschie, M.S., On conjugate time and information in re lativistic quantum theory, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 1995, 5, 1551-1 555. [4] John Argyris and Corneliu Ciubotariu, On El Naschie’s co mplex time and gravitation, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals Special Issue, Volume 8 Number 5 1997, 743-751. [5] Prigogine, I., ”End of Unceertainity”, Free Press, New Y ork, 1997, p.170. [6] Dirac, P.A.M., ”The Principles of Quantum Mechanics”, C larendon Press, Oxford, 1958, p263. [7] Sidharth, B.G., 1998 Int.J.Mod.Phys.A., 13(15), pp259 9-2612. [8] Merzbacher, E., ”Quantum Mechanics”, John Wiley, New Yo rk, 1970, pp10-20. [9] Nottale, L., ”Fractal Space-Time and Microphysics, Wor ld Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1993, p.110-190. [10] Sidharth, B.G., Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2000, 11(8 ), 1269-1278. [11] Sidharth, B.G., ”Issues in Quantized Fractal Space Tim e”, to appear in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 18[12] Ne’eman, Y., in ”Proceedings of Frontiers of Fundament al Physics”, Eds.B.G. Sidharth and A. Burinskii, Universities Press, Hy derabad, 1998, p.83-96. [13] Witten, W., Physics Today, April 1996, pp.24-30. 19
arXiv:physics/0006049v1 [physics.gen-ph] 20 Jun 2000ON STANDARD MODEL HIGGS AND SUPERSTRING THEORIES AFSAR ABBAS Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar-751005, India (e-mail : afsar@iopb.res.in) Abstract It is shown that in the Standard Model, the property of charge quantiza- tion holds for a Higgs with arbitrary isospin and hypercharg e. These deﬁning quantum numbers of the Higgs remain unconstrained while the whole basic and fundamental structure of the Standard Model remains int act. Hence it is shown that the Higgs cannot be a physical particle. Higgs is t he underlying ‘vacuum’ over which the whole ediﬁce of the Standard Model st ands. Also on most general grounds it is established here that as per the St andard Model there is no electric charge above the electro-weak phase tra nsition tempera- ture. Hence there was no electric charge present in the Early Universe. The Superstring Theories are ﬂawed in as much as they are incompa tible with this requirement. 11 Charge Quantization in the Standard Model The SM assumes a repetitive structure for each generation of quarks and leptons [1]. Let us start by looking at the ﬁrst generation [2 ] of quarks and leptons (u, d, e, ν) and assign them to SU(NC)⊗SU(2)L⊗U(1)Y(where NC= 3 ) representation. To keep things as general as possible th is brings in ﬁve unknown hypercharges [3]. Let us now deﬁne the electri c charge in terms of the diagonal generators of SU(2)L⊗U(1)Yas Q=T3+bY (1) In the SM SU(NC)⊗SU(2)L⊗U(1)Yis spontaneously broken through the Higgs mechanism to the group SU(3)c⊗U(1)em. In SM the Higgs is assumed to be a doublet [4]. However we do not use this restric tion either and assume the Higgs φto have any isospin T and arbitrary hypercharge Yφ. The isospin Tφ 3component of the Higgs develops a nonzero vacuum expectatio n value < φ > o. Since we want the U(1)emgenerator Q to be unbroken we require Q < φ > o= 0. This right away ﬁxes b in (3) and we get Q=T3−(Tφ 3 Yφ)Y (2) For the SM to be renormalizable we require that the triangula r anomaly be canceled. This leads to certain constraints which place s ome restrictions on the hypercharges. Also the use of the fact that after the sp ontaneous breaking of SU(NC)⊗SU(2)L⊗U(1)YtoSU(NC)⊗U(1)em, the L- and R-handed charges couple identically with photon helps in pi nning down hy- percharges in terms of the hypercharge of the Higgs. Hence on e obtains quantized electric charges as Q(u) =1 2(1 +1 Nc) Q(d) =1 2(−1 +1 Nc) (3) Q(e) =−1 (4) Q(ν) = 0 (5) 2ForNC= 3 these are the correct charges in the SM. Note that this charge quantization in the SM holds for Higgs for arbitrary T and arbitrary hypercharge. Hence as far as charge quantization is concern ed, the values of T and Yφremain unconstrained. This point, for the special case of th e Higgs doublet was already noted by the author earlier [4]. 2 Higgs particle - a ghost ! Let us continue with the rest of the structure of the SM and see how our general Higgs with unconstrained and unspeciﬁed isospin T a nd hypercharge Yφﬁts into it. We can write the covariant derivative of the SM as Dµ=∂µ+ig1Tφ 3 YφY Bµ−ig2/vectorT./vectorWµ (6) The photon ﬁeld Aµand the orthogonal Zµare written as Aµ=g2Bµ+g1(2Tφ 3 YφYl)W0 µ/radicalbigg g2 2+ (g12Tφ 3 YφYl)2(7) Zµ=−g1(2Tφ 3 YφYL)Bµ+g2W0 µ/radicalbigg g2 2+ (g12Tφ 3 YφYl)2(8) With Dµwe can write the lepton part of the SM Lagrangian as L(lepton ) = ¯qLiγµ(ig1Tφ 3 YφYlBµ)qL+ ¯eRiγµ(ig1Tφ 3 YφYeBµ)eR −¯qLiγµ/bracketleftBig ig2/vectorT./vectorWµ/bracketrightBig qL (9) We ﬁnd that with the hypercharges as speciﬁed above the compl ete struc- ture of the Standard Model stands intact [5]. The point to be e mphasized is that all this is independent of Higgs isospin and hypercha rge, which all throughout remain unconstrained and undetermined. One sho uld not ﬁx any arbitrary values for them as nothing in the theory demand s it. 3We ﬁnd that from rho parameter also [5] the solutions for the i sospin of the Higgs are inﬁnite in number. Again, nothing in the theory demands that one ﬁxes the isospin to a particular value. The point is that the full structure of the SM stands intact wi thout con- straining the quantum numbers isospin and/or the hyperchar ge of the Higgs to any speciﬁc value. All the particles that have been isolat ed in the labo- ratory or have been studied by any other means, besides havin g a speciﬁc mass, have deﬁnite quantum numbers which identify them. In t he case of Higgs here, no one knows of its mass and more importantly its q uantum numbers like isospin and hypercharge, as shown above, are no t speciﬁed. The hypercharge of all the other particles are speciﬁed as be ing proportional to the Higgs hypercharge which itself remains unconstraine d. That is, all the hypercharges of particles are rooted on to the Higgs hyperch arge which itself remains free and unspeciﬁed. Hence Higgs is very diﬀerent fr om all known particles. Because of the above reasons Higgs cannot be a phy sical particle which may be isolated and studied. It must be just the ‘vacuum ’ which sets up the structure of the whole thing. So Higgs is a ghost which s hall not manifest itself as a genuine particle in the laboratory [5]. 3 Superstring Theories-intrinsically ﬂawed! Now we ask the question, with this generalized picture what h appens to the electric charge when the full Standard Model symmetry is res tored. Note that the expression for Q in (2) arose due to spontaneous symmetry breaking of SU(NC)⊗SU(2)L×U(1)Y(forNC= 3 ) to SU(NC)×U(1)em through the medium of a Higgs with arbitrary isospin T and hyp ercharge Yφ. What happens when at higher temperature, as for example foun d in the early universe, the SU(NC)⊗SU(2)L⊗U(1)Ysymmetry is restored ? Then the pa- rameter ‘b’ in the electric charge deﬁnition remains undete rmined. Note that ‘b’ was ﬁxed above due to spontaneous symmetry breaking thro ugh Higgs. Without it ‘b’ remains unknown. Hence when the electroweak s ymmetry is restored, irrespective of the Higgs isospin and hypercharg e the electric charge disappears as a physical quantity. Therefore we ﬁnd that the re was no electric charge in the early universe. Here attention is drawn to the fact that all putative extensi ons of the Standard Model should reduce smoothly and consistently to t he Standard 4Model at low energies. Not only that, all these extensions sh ould be consis- tent with the predictions of the Standard Model at very high t emperatures. Contrary to naive expectations, the SM does make speciﬁc pre dictions at very high temperatures too. For example one clear-cut predictio n of the Standard Model as shown here and also shown earlier, is that at high eno ugh temper- atures (as in the early universe) when the unbroken SU(3)⊗SU(2)⊗U(1) symmetry was restored, there was no electric charge. GUTs an d other stan- dard extensions of the SM are incompatible with this require ment [6]. What about Superstring Theories ? Quite clearly, generical ly in Super- string Theories electric charge exists right up to the Planc k Scale [7]. Hence as per this theory the electric charge, as an inherent proper ty of matter, has existed right from the beginning [8]. This is not correct in t he SM. As shown here and earlier, the electric charge came into existence at a later stage in the evolution of the Universe when the SU(2)L⊗U(1)Ygroup was sponta- neously broken to U(1)em. It was never there all the time. This is because electric charge is a derived quantity. Hence we ﬁnd that in th is regard the Superstring Theories are inconsistent with the SM and hence ﬂawed [9]. 5References [1] K.S.Babu and R.N.Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. Letts. 63, 938 (1989). [2] X.-G.He, G.C.Joshi, H.Lew, B.H.J.McKellar and R.R.Vol kas,Phys. Rev. D40, 3140 (1989). [3] 5. A. Abbas, Phys. Lett. 238 B , 344 (1990). [4] A. Abbas, J. Phys. G. 16, L163 (1990). [5] A. Abbas, ‘What is the Standard Model Higgs ?’ , hep-ph/9912243. [6] A. Abbas, Physics Today ,July 1999 , p.81-82. [7] X. G. Wen and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 261 ,651 (1985). [8] A. N. Schellekens, Phys. Letts. B 237 , 363 (1990) [9] A. Abbas, ‘Electric charge, Early Universe and the Superstring Theo- ries’, hep-ph/9912244. 6
arXiv:physics/0006050v1 [physics.bio-ph] 20 Jun 2000LU TP 00-18 May 22, 2000 Shuﬄing Yeast Gene Expression Data Sven Bilke∗ Complex Systems Division, Department of Theoretical Physi cs University of Lund, S¨ olvegatan 14A, S-22362 Lund, Sweden http://www.thep.lu.se/complex/ Abstract A new method to sort gene expression patterns into functiona l groups is presented. The method is based on a sorting algorithm using a non-local similarity score, which takes allother patterns in the dataset into account. The method is therefore very rob ust wih respect to noise. Using the expression data for yeast, we extract information about functional groups. Without prior knowledge of parameters the cell cycle regulated genes in ye ast can be identiﬁed. Furthermore a second, independent cell clock is identiﬁed. The capabilit y of the algorithm to extract information about signal ﬂow in the regulatory network underlying the ex pression patterns is demonstrated. ∗eMail: sven@thep.lu.se1 Introduction The DNA microarray technology [1] has greatly facilitated t he study of gene expressions. With a single microarray, the expression of thousands of genes ca n be measured simultaneously. Based on the central dogma it is reasonable to understand these exp ression vectors as a description of the functional state of the cell. The dynamics of the state -trajectory observed in expression time series reveals much information about the regulatory n etwork underlying gene expression. A detailed knowledge of this network would allow for the analy sis of possible states and trajectories, including, say, transitions from disease to a healthy state . Therefore, it is very tempting to try to infer the regulatory network from the data. One should, however, be aware of the limitations in the data avai lable so far. It is very possible that large parts of the network were inactive for the states obser ved. These “unexcited” parts of the network can not be deduced from the data. Furthermore imp ortant parts of the regulatory network, like e.g. inter- and intra-cell signalling, are ob served only indirectly by back reaction on the gene expression pattern. Cluster algorithms have been used successfully in the analy sis of gene expression data. Using for example hierarchical clustering it has been demonstrat ed [2] that many genes, which on biological grounds are known to be related, are located near by in the similarity tree. It is however diﬃcult to identify genes which belong to a larger functiona l context, like for example cell cycle regulated genes. If two of the corresponding patterns are ex pressed with a phase diﬀerence close toπ/4, they are uncorrelated and therefore placed on remote site s in the similarity tree. The prior knowledge of the cell cycle frequency νccwas used to identify the cell cycle regulated genes by inspection [3]. In [4] a spectral ﬁlter was used for t his purpose. Expression patterns, for which the spectral energy at frequency ν≈νccis larger than some threshold, were selected as cell cycle regulated. In this work we use a new method, the re-shuﬄing algorithm [5] , to identify functional groups in the expression data. The algorithm sorts the data b ased on a global similarity score, which makes it very robust with respect to noise. The method d oes not distribute the data into clusters. The structure found in the data is rather reﬂe cted in a re-ordered sequence of expression patterns. Using this algorithm we are able to ide ntify the cell cycle regulated genes in the budding yeast S. cerevisae without referring to prior knowledge. Furthermore we ﬁnd a second, independent clock in the cell. The reordered sequen ce of expression patterns can reﬂect the propagation of a signal in the data. Patterns, which resp ond to the same, deformed signal are grouped together, even if they are mutually uncorrelate d. 12 Algorithm In this section we brieﬂy describe the algorithm used to anal yze the data. A more detailed description can be found elsewhere [5]. The starting point is a matrix Cijencoding the similarity between expression patterns iand j. This similarity can, for example, be the mutual informatio n or correlation for the two patterns. The purpose of the algorithm is to ﬁnd a relabeling i→σ(i) such that similar patterns i, j, i.e. \|Cij\| ≈1, get similar labels: \|σ(i)−σ(j)\| ≈1. This is, however, not achieved by performing local, mutual, comparisons, but rather by letting expressi on patterns move freely in a “force- ﬁeld” generated by allother particles. This ﬁeld is is described by the energy Sσ(α, γ, λ ) =−/summationdisplay i,jsgn(Cσ(i)σ(j))γ\|Cσ(i)σ(j)\|αexp−d(i, j)2 Nλ. (1) The optimal sorting in the sense described above is the one mi nimizing this energy. The param- eterαcontrols the importance of the similarity in the sorting pro cedure, we use α= 2. The variable λis a localization parameter. For small λ, mainly similarities close in index space con- tribute to the energy. This leads to a local optimization. Fo r large λa more global optimization is achieved. The parameter γis used to switch between maintaining ( γ= 1) or ignoring ( γ= 0) the sign of Cij. Obviously the average distance dof indices from all other indices is not evenly distributed. It reaches its maximum on the border i= 1, N. This non-ﬂat distribution is not desired, therefore we use a cyclic distance measure in index space. With d(i, j) =  \|i−j\| if\|i−j\|< N/2 \|i−j−N\| if\|i−j\| ≥N/2, (2) the ﬁrst and the last pattern in the list are direct neighbors , the system has no boundary and therefore the ddistribution is ﬂat. Unless Cijhas a very simple form, the minimization of equation (1) is a n on-trivial task. We use simulated annealing [6] for this purpose. In the anneali ng procedure a ﬁctious ensemble temperature Tis lowered. At the beginning, at high temperature, the globa l aspects of the structure contained in the data should be built into the orde r of expression patterns, while towards the end of the annealing procedure, at low temperatu re, the more local optimization takes place. Therefore the localization parameter λis lowered together with the temperature from typically λ= 1 to λ= 0.05 in this procedure. 23 Results For this work we used the expression data for S. cerevisae , which is available on the internet† and described in [4]. Here we want to demonstrate the feasibi lity of our algorithm on a subset of this data set. The original data consists of 82 experiments, which were don e at diﬀerent time points and/or boundary conditions. Each experiment provides measuremen ts of 6177 expression ratios. The subset used here was extracted in the following way: 1. Experiments with more than 400 missing expression ratios were removed. 2. Expression patterns (in gene direction) with more than 8 m issing ratios were removed. 3. From the remaining genes measured in τ= 69 experiments we kept those N= 803 patterns with variance σ >0.5. In the following the Pearson correlation Cij=/summationtextτ t(Di,t−Di)(Dj,t−Dj) τ/radicalBig Var(Di)Var(Dj)(3) is used as the similarity score in equation (1). First the abs olute value \|Cij\|is used ( γ= 0), because we are interested in analyzing functional groups of genes, which show up by (anti)- correlated expression patterns. The result of the sorting p rocedure is visualized in ﬁgure 1, a graphical representation of the correlation matrix. In thi s diagram the intensity of the pixel at coordinate ( i, j) is proportional to the absolute value \|Cij\|. Red color represents correlation, green color anti-correlation. At coordinates adjacent to the main diagonal of the matrix on e clearly observes a grouping of gene expression patterns. With the help of the annotation s for the genes involved one can verify that the grouping reﬂects a classiﬁcation with respe ct to gene function. The annotation displayed in ﬁgure 1 refers to the most frequent phrase found in the annotation database for the genes in these groups. These typical phrases do not exclusiv ely show up there, their distribution over the whole dataset is, however, strongly peaked in the ma rked groups. The diagram does not only contain information about the domi nant correlation, which clus- ters the genes into groups. Sub-dominant co-regulations ca n be seen in the more oﬀ-diagonal †http://cellcycle-www.standford.edu 3Figure 1: Correlation Matrix for the 800 most variant gene ex pression patterns. The annotation refers to the most frequent annotation found in the database for the genes in this group. parts of the matrix. As expected, the non-local interaction (1) sorts the groups on the main diag- onal such that clusters with sub-dominant co-regulation gr oup together. Therefore the distance of groups on the main diagonal reﬂects the relative strength of co-regulation. In the oﬀ-diagonal correlation coeﬃcients an interesting ﬁne structure can be observed: for example in the region marked with an arrow one sees that two groups, which are inter nally correlated, can be corre- lated and anti-correlated at the same time. From this observ ation one can infer a ﬁne-structure into the groups on the diagonal. The checker board patterns observed in the upper left and low er right in ﬁgure 1 are very interesting. Obviously they are generated by oscillatory p rocesses: adjacent red and green blocks indicate co-regulated, but mutually exclusive expr essed genes. These genes are active in diﬀerent parts of a cycle. By inspection of gene annotations , the lower right functional group is identiﬁed as cell-cycle regulated genes. In [4] these genes were identiﬁed using a diﬀerent method. Expression patterns, for which the Fourier component for fr equencies close to the expected cell- cycle frequency were larger than some threshold were identi ﬁed as cell-cycle regulated. For our method, the introduction of a threshold and knowledge of the oscillator frequency is not necessary. The checker board in the upper left corner represents a secon d cell “clock”. From the intensity of the correlation of this group with the cell-cyc le, we conclude that this second clock isnotstrongly coupled to the cell cycle. Therefore this function al group is an independent 4oscillator. To elaborate this further we have analyzed the f requency spectrum for the expression patterns of genes in this group and for the cell-cycle regula ted genes. Both spectral power distributions show a clear maximum at a frequency ν, which diﬀers signiﬁcantly for the two groups. For the second clock we ﬁnd ν= 4/7νcc, where νccis the frequency which maximizes the cell cycle power spectrum. The method used in [4] could th erefore not identify the genes in this group as cyclic regulated. A list of genes controlled by this cell-clock is available at http://www.thep.lu.se/˜sven. Un- fortunately, the maximal time-span, for which experiments were done, contains only one complete cycle of this clock. It is therefore not possible to decide, i f this is a continuous oscillator or a one-shot clock. Some annotations which appear frequently f or the genes found in this functional group make it plausible, that this clock controls the transc ription of genes and the synthesis of proteins. Next we want to show how the non-local part of the interaction in (1) inﬂuences the ordering of gene expression patterns. For each site iin the list of expression patterns one can deﬁne an eﬀective prototype expression Pi, which is induced by allexpression patterns in the data set via the energy. This prototype is the pattern which minimizes th e energy, the solution Di,tof 0 =∂ ∂Di,tS(α, β), t = 1. . .τ. (4) In general this optimal pattern will diﬀer from site to site. Hence it can follow a signal which is deformed from a pattern Ato a pattern B. To demonstrate this property we choose the cell-cycle regul ated genes, where the signal “activated” travels through the system. Diﬀerently from ab ove, where the list of patterns was sorted with with respect to co-regulation, anti-correlate d genes should notbe grouped together in this case, because presumably they belong to opposite par ts of the cell cycle. We therefore choose γ= 1, when relabeling the expression patterns. In ﬁgure 2 the c orrelation coeﬃcients for the cell cycle regulated genes sorted in this way are display ed. We have used the analysis in [4] to assign the genes to a speciﬁc part in the cell-cycle, the re sult is presented as the annotation in the diagram. Obviously the data is correctly time-ordere d‡. Note that the algorithm does in no way explicitly refer to the time aspect in the data. In fact , the energy (1) is invariant under the exchange of experiments, diﬀerent time-points. This ob servation conﬁrms the capability of the algorithm to identify a previously unknown signal-path way hidden in the data. ‡Remember the list is cyclic, i.e.the last line is logically adjacent to the ﬁrst line 5Figure 2: Correlation Matrix for the set of patterns annotat ed “Cell Cycle” in ﬁgure (1) after resorting with γ= 1. Annotations following [4]. 4 Discussion Re-shuﬄing is eﬃcient in ﬁnding functional groups in the exp ression data. The philosophy of this algorithm is considerably diﬀerent from cluster algor ithm, which compare each pattern p locally with some prototypic pattern for each cluster and ﬁn ally assign pto the cluster with the most similar prototype. In this way many of these algorit hms do not use the information available about inter-cluster similarities. Re-shuﬄing i s based on a global comparison with all patterns in the ensemble. In this way it makes use of the infor mation contained in sub-leading similarities as well. We want to emphasize that this method i s not restricted to the analysis of time expression data. It can also be used to detect pattern s in static data to identify, for example, genes which are responsible for a certain phenotyp e or disease. Self organizing maps use a non-local assignment of patterns to neurons. Therefore they can reﬂect inter-cluster similarities. They were used in [7,8] to classify yeast gene expression patterns. With this method it is possible to identify the cell cycle osc illation as a dominant motif in the expression data [7]. However, the neurons most active for th e corresponding patterns at diﬀerent parts of the cell cycle were not grouped in an obvious way. It w as not possible to identify these patterns as belonging to the same functional cycle. The re-shuﬄing method is able to extract this information. W ithout any prior knowledge it can identify the cell cycle regulated genes. It is very inter esting to observe that the algorithm extracts time information from the data without actually re ferring to the time aspect. This demonstrates that the pathways of signals can be extracted f rom the data using this method. 6This aspect can be very useful when analyzing functional gro ups which are not so well known as the cell cycle. A further example of the algorithms power i s the identiﬁcation of a second independent clock in yeast. A general problem when analyzing expression data is noise. W hen measurements are easily available, the usual way to reduce noise is to increase the nu mber Mof measurements until the noise level σ∝1/√ Mis small enough. Repeated measurements of the same system wo uld also allow for a reliable estimation of the noise level. This know ledge is crucial when interpreting the results of an analysis. However, gene expression measur ements are quite costly in time and are usually not repeated. Therefore the methods used to anal yze the data have to be relatively insensitive to noise. The re-shuﬄing algorithm is very robu st in this respect because the energy function (1) used in the sorting procedure averages over allpatterns in the data set. Many cluster algorithms and self organizing maps only average over a subs et of the data when extracting a prototype for a cluster (or a neighborhood of a neuron). They are therefore more sensitive with respect to noise. The visualization of the correlation matrix gives some insi ght into the connectivity of the underlying regulatory network. One may ask if it is possible to learn the full network from the data. The complexity of the model that can be inferred from th e data is strictly limited by Shannons theorem Ixmit N=νmaxlog2/parenleftbigg 1 +S P/parenrightbigg . (5) The signal S– the mRNA concentration in the cell-plasma – is “transmitte d” over a channel (the measurement process) with noise P. With an estimated 15% noise-level and the bandwidth given by the Nyquist frequency νmax= 1/2, the maximal amount of information extractable from one measurement of NORF’s is less than Ix=3N 2bits. This is the theoretical upper limit on the information content in the data. It can only be reached if an optimal code is used. This is certainly not the case for the gene expression data, as it c ontains a lot of redundancy. The maximal complexity of a model which can be inferred from the d ata is therefore considerably smaller than estimated by equation (5). The amount of inform ation required to describe the connectivity of a possibly fully connected network of Nnodes is If≈N(N−1)/2>> τIxmit, much larger than available from the τmeasurements. Even if one restricts the maximal number of connections to k, the information Ir≈Nklog2Nrequired to describe the connectivity of this network is larger than available already for small k. It seems therefore necessary to reduce the number Nof nodes in the network. This can be done by introducing colle ctive nodes representing a whole subset of the original genes. The groups resulting fr om re-shuﬄing the data might be a 7good starting point for this. In the future the algorithm can be modiﬁed to operate in a high er dimensional index space. In this way a more reﬁned representation of structure found i n the data is possible. It may also be useful to combine hierarchical clustering with this meth od, which can be used to freeze the orientation degree of freedom on each branching point in the similarity tree. 5 Acknowledgement I want to thank ˚A. Borg, C. Peterson and M. Ringn´ er for fruitful discussion s. This work was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research . References [1] Schena, M., Shalon, M., Davis, R.W., Brown, P.O. (1995) Science 270, 467-70 [2] Eisen, M.B., Spellman, P.T., Brown, P.O., Botstein, D. ( 1998), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14863-68 [3] Cho, R.J., Campbell, M.J., Winzeler, E.J., Steinmetz, L ., Conway, A., Wodicka, L., Wolfs- berg, T.G., Gabrielian, A.E., Landsman, D., Lockhart, D.J. , Davis, R.W. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 65-73 [4] Spellman, P.T., Sherlock, G., Zhang, M.Q., Iyer, V.R., A nders, K., Eisen, M.N., Brown, P.O., Botstein, D., Futcher, B. (1008) Mol. Biol. Cell. 9, 3273-97 [5] Bilke, S., “Re-shuﬄing Algorithm”, in preparation. [6] Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Vecchi, M.P., (1983) Science 220, 671-80 [7] Tamayo, P., Slonim, D., Mesirov, J., Zhu, Q., Litareewan , S. Dmitrosky, E., Lander, E.S., Golub, T.R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96, 2907-12 [8] T¨ or¨ onen, P., Kolehmainen, M., Wong, G,. Castren, E. (1 999)FEBS Letters 451, 142-6 8
arXiv:physics/0006051v1 [physics.gen-ph] 20 Jun 2000Time and the laws of Nature Alexey Mazur∗ Abstract What is time? Why does it ”ﬂow” and why are we sure that it ﬂows f rom past towards future? Why is there such a gigantic distinction bet ween the Past of our world, which we believe to be ﬁxed, and the Future, which we consider undetermined? And this is in spite of the fact that almost all physical laws are t ime-symmetric! Why does previously undetermined ”Future” acquire its steadiness a s it passes the moment called ”the Present”? Perhaps, these questions are partially answ ered in the considerations below. Let us retract from our particular Universe and think about w hat kind of laws can in principle govern the development of universes. As a unive rse, we will understand any world, even an imaginary one, that can have diﬀerent states a nd has laws of transition from one state to another as ”time” passes by. Generally spea king, such laws can be probabilistic, i.e. they set the probabilities of transiti on from one particular state to another. Let us group these laws in categories on the basis of their res pect to time. The ﬁrst, and the most widespread in our world, category is th e category of bilaterally deterministic laws. ”Bilaterally” means that these laws de termine unambiguously what was the precursor and what will be the successor to a given sta te. (For the sake of simplicity, we will assume time discrete.) The second possible type of law embraces bilaterally undete rministic (probabilistic) laws. In other words, starting from a given present state, we can arrive, with a certain probability, to a number of diﬀerent states. The present sta te, in its turn, can be the result of evolution of several possible states in past, agai n with certain probabilities. (The case of complete chaos falls precisely into this catego ry.) Laws of the third type, which we intend to discuss in detail, a re unilaterally deter- ministic laws. This means that such a law will uniquely presc ribe what a given state will evolve into. However, the present state itself can originat e from diﬀerent states in past. At the ﬁrst glance, one could think of laws of the fourth categ ory, i.e. laws that ﬁx the ancestor to a given state but is probabilistic in respect to its successors. However, since the direction of time axis is subjective, this categor y is identical to the third one, which will be discussed later in more detail. An example of the universe evolving in compliance with the th ird type of laws is given by the famous Conway’s Game of Life. Let me brieﬂy describe it . A 2D square grid is ∗E-mail: mazur@sol.ru 1populated by a colony of tips, each tip living in one cell. If a tip has two or three neighbors, it survives and proceeds to the next generation. Tips with ze ro or one neighbor die of ”loneliness”, while those with more than three neighbors di e of ”overcrowding”. New tips are born in cells contiguous to exactly three living tip s. The laws of evolution in this world are more than simple, with every next generation being unambiguously determined by the previous one; the development of colonies can turn out very interesting. However, it is plain to see that it is far from an easy task to re store the previous state of a given one. Moreover, there can be a multitude of them. Now think of a researcher who watches how these states turn into one another but he watc hes this backward in time. He is trying to determine the laws this evolution follows but at best he can deduce only probabilistic distributions to obtain this or that state fr om a given one. What does it look similar to? Now I proceed to my principal statement: the laws of our world are of unilaterally deterministic nature, if we choose ”from futu re to past” as the correct direction of the time axis. Apparently, the combination of unilaterally and bilateral ly deterministic laws results in the unilaterally deterministic world, therefore the maj ority of the known laws does not determine the general nature of our universe. Moreover, the majority of laws are known to be CP-even and thus can be classiﬁed as laws of the ﬁrs t or second category. (As a matter of fact, I am deeply convinced that there are no la ws of the second kind in our universe. Otherwise, if there were several alternati ves to past, how could we re- member the only one of them, known as ”the Past”?) The only exc lusion I am aware of (I apologize for my possible ignorance) is the weak interact ion. Evidently, it is the weak interaction that possesses the unilaterally deterministi c nature and, in absence of the competitors, determines the unilateral nature of our unive rse. This explains the enor- mous diﬀerence between the past and the future, which is clea rly apparent to any of us. We do remember our past, because it is uniquely determined by the present. We know that millions of years ago the Earth was inhabited by dinosau rs but no one has even a slightest idea who will occupy the Earth million years from n ow. We can ”remember” and accumulate information because the past is strictly det ermined. Almost entire (see below more on ”almost”) information about the past is contai ned in the present. But not the information on the future. If the laws of nature were bila terally deterministic, there would be no chance of any slightest development (in our under standing of this word). Time would be simply another dimension of the space, though q uite a peculiar one. Now - several speculative remarks on why our Universe is what it is and what con- clusions can be drawn from the above discussion. 1. Of course, one might seem quite naive to tackle this ”why” q uestion, but nonethe- less I suggest doing this on the basis of assumption that the w orld is designed in such a way that it ensures the existence of OBSERVERS. In other wor lds, even if they exist, there is nobody to ask this question. So, starting from unive rsal CPT conservation, one can conclude that in the world built of antimatter time wi ll ﬂow in the opposite direction. I.e. in this world the future is ﬁxed, while the pa st can have alternatives. So, the well known problem ”how to determine by means of radio wave communication whether you are talking to a creature built of matter or antim atter” no longer arises. Indeed, such a contact is just impossible, since the same sig nal will be considered emit- ted by both parties (by an antenna - at the one end, by synchron ously distinct atoms towards the antenna - at the other). The information exchang e is simply impossible. 2But nevermind, there seem to be no problems with antimatter c reatures in our world by the virtue of almost absolute absence of the antimatter itse lf. But since the antimatter has ”time-opposite” nature, it introduces indeterminacy i nto our past. Obviously, it is matter-to-antimatter relation that dictates the relation between indeterminacy in past and future. These two forms of disproportion - between matte r and antimatter content of our universe, and between determinacy in past and future - are not only connected, but also necessitate one another. 2. One should undertake a search for some relatively simple l aws that the weak interaction follows in the ”backward time”. 3. If there exist only ﬁnite number of states of universe, the re must also exist special states, called ”Gardens of Eden”, that have (in the backward time) successors but do not have any precursor (if some states have more than one prec ursors, then there are no precursors left for some of the other). For the usual directi on of the time axis it means that there is NO SINGLE state that our present state can evolv e into. That is, ”Garden of Eden” for us is the apocalypse in its direct and literal mea ning. In the Game of Life such ”Gardens of Eden” have been found. This problem is howev er removed in the case of inﬁnite number of states. (An example: a universe, whose s tates are real numbers from 0 to 1. The evolution law: take the inﬁnite decimal fract ion that represents this number and erase the ﬁrst decimal digit. The resulting numbe r represents the next state of the universe. It is clear that every state of this universe has ten precursors.) 4. The model of unilaterally deterministic universe remove s the contradiction between ”God does not play dice” and the freedom of will, obviously gi ven to a human being. If one wishes, one can think that God has created a ﬁnite (ﬁnit e for us) state of the universe and the laws of universe evolution in the ”backward time”. And now He is surprised to ﬁnd people who think that everything is evolvin g in the opposite time. 5. The choice of time axis direction is subjective. If we introduce another axis, arrange all states of the unive rse along it, and undertake an unbiased analysis, we will ﬁnd the following. At each mome nt of time tcreatures dwelling in the Universe are convinced that the moment of tim et−1 was in past. What is the ground for this belief? Only the fact that creatures po ssess signiﬁcantly richer information about this moment than about moment t+ 1. And at the moment t+ 1 they ”remember” that ”some time ago”, at moment t, they have just learn about this moment t. This tempts them to think that time is directed from past to f uture. But I think that as far as the physical laws are concerned, the cor rect choice of time axis direction should be exactly opposite. 3
arXiv:physics/0006052v1 [physics.gen-ph] 21 Jun 2000SCHWARZSCHILD’S CURVED SPACETIME LAGRANGIAN WITH ITS QUANTUM EQUATIONS. Mladen Boˇ zin The Rudjer Boˇ skovi´ c Institute, Bijeniˇ cka c.54,10000 Za greb,Croatia bozin@rudjer.irb.hr (February 21, 2014) Abstract From the curved spacetime Lagrangian the ﬁrst approximatio n scalar particle quantum equation was obtained following the canonical form alism. Then the roots of this equation in Schwarzschild’s pseudo ﬂat spa ce were found. As it was shown in a more general curved spacetime it is tediou s to ﬁnd equation’s roots. The massless particle limiting case was c onsidered. The Maxwell set of equations generalized to Schwarzschild’s sp ace was reproduced. The generalized charge concept was presented. The concept w as connected with the present approach. On the basis of the concept the ele mentary particle Schwarzschild radii were calculated. PACS 101110Ef I. INTRODUCTION One of the widely accepted approaches to the quantum gravity subject are the quantum ﬁelds in curved spacetime. The subject of quantum ﬁelds in cu rved spacetime as an step toward the ﬁnal quantum gravity theory was repeatedly cover ed in many papers and else- where [1]. The quantization of the gravitational ﬁeld was co nsidered in many attempts in the past few decades but a completely satisfactory quantum t heory of gravity remains un- reachable. Besides the subject of quantum ﬁelds in curved sp acetime one of these attempts 1is the the supergravity theory based on the supersymmetry [2 ] as the most accepted and signiﬁcant ones. In the quantum ﬁelds in curved spacetime ap proach the gravitational ﬁeld is considered as a background ﬁeld while the matter ﬁelds are quantized in the usual way. This approach consists of the subject of the quantum ﬁeld the ory in a curved background by taking the general theory of relativity as a description of t he gravity. The essential part of the quantum ﬁelds in curved spacetime approximation is the M inkowskian space quantum ﬁeld theory [4]. In the quantum ﬁelds in curved spacetime app roach the Lagrange function of a quantum ﬁeld in the curved spacetime was carried over fro m the corresponding function in Minkowskian space. The Lagrange functions of a quantum ﬁe ld was usually clasiﬁed according to the constitutive ﬁeld transformation propert ies under the inﬁnitesimal Lorentz transformations. From the Lagrangian densities of the scal ar, spinor or the electromagnetic ﬁelds in the Minkowski space the corresponding action in cur ved spacetime was obtained. The quantum ﬁeld equation was obtained by setting the variat ion of the action with respect to the corresponding ﬁeld equal to zero. The curved spacetime Lagrangian with its quantum equations subject is opposed to the quantum ﬁelds in curved spacetime approach. On the contrary to the above concept in the present issue the Lagrange function is completely diﬀerent from the usual one. The Lagrange function is introduced as it is formulated classicaly inste ad of the quantum mechanicaly. Such function contains no usual ﬁelds or their ﬁrst derivati ves but on the contrast it has a geometrical structure. Moreover the function is not obtain ed from the corresponding func- tion in the Minkowski space but it is formulated from the begi nning in a curved spacetime. The essential part in the present approach is the classical g eometrical curved spacetime La- grange function. The quantization of the classical Lagrang e function formulated in a curved spacetime proceeds through the canonical formalism. This p rocedure closely follows that one formulated in Minkowskian spacetime. In the continuati on the procedure will be brieﬂy outlined. The classical Lagrange function in the ﬂat spacet ime is L(x,˙x) =/integraldisplay λ(x,˙x)d3x. (1) 2The Lagrange equations of the motion are obtained by demandi ng that the corresponding actionδ/integraltextL(x,˙x)dt= 0 is stationary d dt∂L(x,˙x) ∂˙x=∂L(x,˙x) ∂x,p=∂L(x,˙x) ∂˙x. (2) The equations are expressed with the Hamilton function H(x,p) =p˙x−L(x,˙x) ∂H(x,p) ∂p={H(x,p),x}= ˙x,−∂H(x,p) ∂x={H(x,p),p}= ˙p (3) through the Poisson brackets {A,B}=∂A ∂x∂B ∂p−∂A ∂p∂B ∂x. (4) The corresponding quantum equation is obtained after the us ual substitutions pµ= (E c,pi)→i¯h(∂ ∂x0,−∂ ∂xi). (5) Historically ﬁrst such example was obtained when Schr¨ odin ger wrote its famous equation i¯h∂ψ ∂t=−¯h2 2m∂ψ ∂xby replacing the momentum p=m˙xwith the quantum momentum operator in the classical non relativistic Hamilton function H=p2 2m.According to the canonical formalism that function corresponds to the Lagrange functi onL=m( ˙x)2 2. Through the canonical procedure with the geometrical Lagra nge function features char- acteristic of quantum mechanics can be derived. One of the mo st important characteristic is the quantum equation of the corresponding particle. The nex t geometrical quantity besides the Lagrange function is its Hamiltonian. The quantum equat ion is obtained by imposing a condition on this function. We see that the diﬀerencies between these two approaches are considerable. We should expect that the diﬀerencies are even more pronounced by cons idering the ﬁnal results. How- ever that was not the case. In spite of such considerable init ial diﬀerencies the ﬁnal appear- ance of both approaches shows no signiﬁcant discrepancies. It was shown by the results that the physical reality was quite similar in both cases. Another quantization technique is the path integral quanti zation. Although it will not be considered here we note the fundamental role that the Lagr ange function has in it. There 3by the action as the generating function of a canonical trans formation the system variables are transformed from one time to another. Moreover the gener ating functional in which the most important part is the Lagrange function together with t he arbitrary potential function (extended by the source therm containing the current) is use d to calculate Green’s functions. The particular curved space where the Lagrangian function w as established is not yet se- lected. In Sec.2. the canonical procedure with the Schwarzs child Lagrangian was presented. Here the Schwarzschild metric space was selected because of the one of its fundamental prop- erties. The fundamental property of such metric is the absen ce of the oﬀ diagonal elements g0iin the metric tensor gµν. This metric corresponds to a pseudo ﬂat curved spacetime. Moreover the Schwarzschild metric is one of the best investi gated time independent, spher- ically symmetric solutions of the Einstein equations in an e mpty space [3]. The canonical procedure with the Lagrangian function in this spacetime re sults in a scalar ﬁeld quantum equation. By the above property of the metric tensor it was po ssible to ﬁnd the roots of the general quadratic quantum equation for the scalar ﬁeld. Fur thermore the results of Section were extended to the more general metric. The ﬂat space limit ing case was discussed. At the end of Section the more general example with nonzero oﬀ di agonal metric tensor element was given. This is the Kerr metric example. In the most genera l case with the nonzero oﬀ diagonal elements it is tedious if at all possible analitica ly to ﬁnd the roots as was shown in Sec.3. Furthermore in that Section in the special case when t he discriminant of the general equation is zero the solution with the vanishing oﬀ diagonal elements was obtained in agree- ment with the results in Sec.2. In Sec.4 the calculations in t he massless particle limiting case will be done. Anlogously with Sec.2. results the quadra tic equation and its roots were found. Then it was shown that the calculation of the root equa tion leads us to the well known Maxwell set of equations generalized to the curved Sch warzschild space. In Sec.5. some speculations about the generalized charge hypothesis will be presented. In accordance with the hypothesis the Schwarzschild radii of the particle will be estimated. 4II. CANONICAL PROCEDURE WITH THE SCHWARZSCHILD LAGRANGIAN Schwarzschild’s empty space is deﬁned by the expression ds2=eν(r)(cdt)2−eλ(r)(dr)2−r2[(dθ)2+sin2θ(dφ)2] (6) The unknown functions ν(r) and theλ(r) are obtained from the empty space Einstein equation. According to this equation the condition is impos ed on Ricci’s tensor Rαβ={γ αγ}\|β− {γ αβ}\|γ+{γ δβ}{δ αγ} − {γ δγ}{δ αβ}= 0 (7) {α βγ}=gαξ[βγ,ξ],[αβ,γ] =1 2(∂gαγ ∂xβ+∂gβγ ∂xα−∂gαβ ∂xγ). (8) The solution of the equation reads eν(r)=e−λ(r)= 1−2m r. (9) From the eq.(6) and the eq.(9) the velocity square in the Schw arzschild space was obtained ˙s2= (1−2m r)(c˙t)2−(1 1−2m r)(˙r)2−r2[(˙θ2+ sin2θ(˙φ)2]. (10) The quantization was proceeded according to canonical form alism. First the Lagrange func- tion was found. It was guessed on the basis of the classical ar guments that the Lagrange function is proportional to the velocity square in Schwarzs child’s space L(x,˙x) =M 4˙s2. (11) By substituting from the eq.(10) into the eq.(11) Lagrange’ s function was obtained L(x,˙x) =M 4((1−2m r)(c˙t)2−(1 1−2m r)(˙r)2−r2[(˙θ2+ sin2θ(˙φ)2]). (12) In the Schwarzschild spacetime the four coordinate was cons isted of its contravariant and covariant components. These components are not equal and we re denoted as 5xα= (ct,r,θ,φ ),xα= ct r θ φ . (13) The contravariant momentum components pµconjugated to the contravariant coordinate xµ were calculated by combining the expression (2) with the eq. (12) p0=∂L(x,˙x) ∂(c˙t)=M 2(1−2m r)c˙t (14) p1=∂L(x,˙x) ∂˙r=−M 2(1 1−2m r)˙r (15) p2=∂L(x,˙x) ∂˙θ=−M 2r2˙θ (16) p3=∂L(x,˙x) ∂˙φ=−M 2r2sin2θ˙φ. (17) These components together with the covariant momentum comp onents in the Schwarzschild space read pα=m 2((1−2m r)(c˙t),−(1 1−2m r)(˙r),−r2˙θ,−r2sin2θ˙φ),pα= c˙t ˙r ˙θ ˙φ . (18) The contravariant momentum components were connected with the covariant components through the metric tensors gαβ= (1−2m r) −(1 1−2m r) −r2 −r2sin2θ ,gαβ= (1 1−2m r) −(1−2m r) −1 r2 −1 r2sin2θ . (19) 6All together was collected H(x,p) =pα( ˙x)α−L(x,˙x) =L(x,˙x) (20) so the Hamilton and the Lagrange functions in the Shwarzschi ld spacetime are equal. Here the equations (2),(12),(13) and (18) were put together. The velocity components from (10)were substituted by the corresponding momentum compon ents from the equation (18) into the eq.(20). The Hamilton function in Schwarzschild’s spacetime reads H(x,p) =1 M[1 1−2m r(p0)2−(1−2m r)(p1)2−1 r2(p2)2−1 r2sin2θ(p3)2] =1 Mgµνpµpν.(21) In the ﬁrst approximation for a gravitational ﬁeld the energ y of a scalar particle has a constant value. This value does not depend on any of the four c omponent coordinate value as it is for example the particle space position. In this appr oximation it is favourable to choose the constant value equal to the energy of the scalar pa rticleH=Mc2. To the contrary if the coupling between a scalar or a spinor ﬁeld and the gravi tational ﬁeld is not negligeable the particle energy generally depends on the coordinate x. I n that case the function has been usually chosen as the Ricci scalar curvature R(x) and we haveH=Mc2+ξR(x). From now on we shall take the ﬁrst approximation case. In that approximation the description of a scalar particle in the gravitational space proceeds by equating the energy of the particle to its Hamilton’s function. From the eq.(21) th e expression 1 M[1 1−2m r(p0)2−(1−2m r)(p1)2−1 r2(p2)2−1 r2sin2θ(p3)2] =Mc2(22) as well as the energy expression were obtained 1 1−2m rE2 c2= (1−2m r)(p1)2+1 r2(p2)2+1 r2sin2θ(p3)2+M2c2. (23) By substituting pα→i¯h∂αfor the four-momentum and denoting by ψ(x) the quantum wave function we have the quantum equation in Schwarzschild’s sp ace ¯h2[1 1−2m r∂2 ∂(x0)2−(1−2m r)∂2 ∂(r)2−1 r2∂2 ∂(θ)2−1 r2sin2θ∂2 ∂(ψ)2]ψ(x) +M2c2ψ(x) = 0.(24) 7After the Dirac matrices were introduced γα= (β,βαi) (25) the root of equation reads 1/radicalig 1−2m rE c=/radicaligg 1−2m rα1p1+1 rα2p2+1 rsinθα3p3+βMc. (26) The quantum root equation reads (i¯hoα∂α−Mc)ψ(x) = 0 (27) where it was designated oα= (γ0 /radicalig 1−2m r,γ1/radicaligg 1−2m r,γ2 r,γ3 rsinθ). (28) Far away from the Schwarzschild’s ﬁeld we are in the r→ ∞ limit. In that limiting case the space should become the ﬂat one. By taking that r→ ∞ in eq. (24) and eq.(27) it was found ¯h2(∂2 ∂(x0)2−∂2 ∂r2)φ(x) +M2c2φ(x) = 0 (29) (i¯hγ0∂0+i¯hγ1∂1−Mc)ψ(x) = 0 (30) respectively. The above expressions should be compared wit h the ﬂat spacetime quantum equations. The ﬂat spacetime is charactrized by the Minkows ki metric tensor gµν=gµν= 1 −1 −1 −1 (31) The squared four velocity is given by the expression ˙ s2=c˙t2−˙x12−˙x22−˙x32.The conjugated momentum components to the time and to the Cartesius coordin ates are 8p0=M 2c˙t,pi=−M 2˙xi,i= 1,2,3. (32) The Hamilton’s function equals to Mc2 H(x,p) =1 m[(p0)2−p2] =Mc2(33) and the special relativity energy expression is obtained. F inally the familiar equations emerge (¯h2∂µ∂µ+M2c2)φ(x) = 0. (34) (i¯hγµ∂µ−Mc)ψ(x) = 0. (35) The equation (29) and the eq.(30) are the same as the eq.(34) a nd the eq.(35) respectively in our case with two variables. In this case the equations hav e one space and one time component. It follows that the quantum equations have the co rrect behaviour in ﬂat space limiting case. Here we note that the same letter M was used for the Schwarzsch ild Lagrangian mass parameter as for the energy parameter. Each of this paramete rs enters the equation (27), ﬁrst one through the Lagrange function (12) and second one th rough total energy expression (22). Generally, these two parametars are not necessary equ al. In such case if we denote the diﬀerent values of the above parameters by MandM′the expression Min the eq.(27) should be replaced with the expression√ MM′so that this equation in the more general case reads (i¯hoα∂α−√ MM′c)ψ(x) = 0. (36) In the Schwarzschild case the oﬀ diagonal components of the m etric tensor were equal to zero. At the end of this section let us consider the quantum equation analogous to the eq.(24) but this time in Kerr’s spacetime where the oﬀ diagon al components of the metric tensor do not vanish. 9¯h2[/parenleftbigg 1−2mr r2+a2cos2θ/parenrightbigg∂2 ∂(x0)2+r2+a2cos2θ r2+a2−2mr∂2 ∂(x1)2+ /parenleftig r2+a2/parenrightig cos2θ∂2 ∂(x2)2+/parenleftigg/parenleftig r2+a2/parenrightig sin2θ+2mra2sin4θ r2+a2cos2θ/parenrightigg∂2 ∂(x3)2+ 2mrasin2θ r2+a2cos2θ∂ ∂(x0)∂ ∂(x3)]φ(x) +M2c2φ(x) = 0. (37) We see an extra term g03breaking the metric tensor symmetry. In this case it is tedio us to ﬁnd the roots of the quantum equation. III. SCHWARZSCHILD’S LIMIT OF THE EQUATION IN THE GENERAL CURVED SPACETIME The Kerr metric is an example of a general curved spacetime. I n a general curved spacetime the oﬀ diagonal elements of metric tensor do not va nish. In this Section the most general metric was used to form an equation analogous to the e q.(24). Such metric was given by the symmetric form gµν=gνµso the metric tensor has ten independent components. The metric tensor of the general curved spacetime reads gαβ= g00g01g02g03 g11g12g13 g22g23 g33 . (38) The corresponding equation reads g00(p0)2+g01p0p1+g02p0p2+g03p0p3+g11(p1)2+g12p1p2+g13p1p3+g22(p2)2+ g23p2p3+g33(p3)2−M2c2= 0.(39) In order to ﬁnd out a special form of the equation (39) the labe ls were introduced A=g00,B=p1g01+p2g02+p3g03 C= (p1)2g11+p1p2g12+p1p3g13+ (p2)2g22+p2p3g23+ (p3)2g33−M2c2 (40) 10so the equation was rewritten in the form of the quadratic alg ebaric equation. The variable of the equation was the energy A(p0)2+B(p0) +C= 0. (41) There were two solutions of the quadratic equation (41) (p0)1,2=−B±√ B2−4AC 2A. (42) The analytical solutions were depended on the discriminant of the equation (42) B2−4AC= (p1)2(g2 01−4g00g11) +p1p2(2g01g02−g00g12) + +p1p3(2g01g03−4g00g13) + (p2)2(g2 02−4g00g22) + p2p3(2g02g03−4g00g23) + (p3)2(g2 03−4g00g33) + 4g00M2c2. (43) In the general case when the metric tensor oﬀ-diagonal compo nents were diﬀerent from zero it is diﬃcult or even impossible to calculate analitically t he roots of expression (43). Let us now discuss the opposite case as it has been done in Sec. 2. If the oﬀ diagonal components of the metric tensor (38) vanish then the coeﬃcie nts in the equation (40) become A=g00,B= 0,C= (p1)2g11+ (p2)2g22+ (p3)2g33−M2c2. (44) Having substituted (44)into the eq.(42) for this particula r case the analytical solutions read (p0)1,2=±/radicaligg −C A. (45) The eq.(44) and the eq.(45) were combined together with the r esult √g00(p0)1,2=±/radicalig M2c2−g11(p1)2−g22(p2)2−g33(p3)2. (46) The root was found at the usual way and thus we arrive at the exp ression √g00p0=α1√g11p1+α2√g22p2+α3√g33p3+βMc (47) By using the labels 11oα= (γ0 √g00,γi √gii) (48) the eq.(27)was recalculated. By comparison of the expressi ons (28),(48) with the expression (19) we conclude that the Schwarzschild curved spacetime eq uation was obtained. This Section was concluded by examination of the transforma tion properties of the so- lutionψ(x) under the proper Lorentz transformations in Schwarzschil d’s space. This trans- formation was denoted x′α= Ωα βxβ,∂′α= Ωα β∂β,ψ′(x′) =S(Ω)ψ(x). (49) The transformation property of the Schwarzschild operator (28) was straightforwardly cal- culated by using the eq.(49) gαβS−1(Ω)oβS(Ω) = Ω αγoγ. (50) TheS(Ω) matrix depends on the ocommutator S(Ω) =e−φ 4[oα,oβ]. (51) where it was supposed that Dirac’s matrices satisfy the usua l commutation relations. Then the o commutation relations read [o0,o1] = [γ0,γ1],[o0,o2]/ne}ationslash= [γ0,γ2],[o0,o3]/ne}ationslash= [γ0,γ3]. (52) IV. THE MASSLESS PARTICLE LIMIT OF THE SCHWARZSCHILD QUANTUM EQUATIONS A massless particle in the Schwarzschild spacetime was disc ussed. A massless particle follows the geodetic lines of curved spacetime. The arch len gth of such particle is equal to zero and consequently its Lagrange’s function vanishes L(x,˙x) = 0. (53) 12The equations of motion should have the same form regardless of the particular reference system where there is an observer. So we were permitted to cho ose such reference system in which the zero component of the electromagnetic potentia l is equal to zero. By such choice the dynamic case was selected. Consequently there we re no static electric ﬁelds in the observer frame of reference. Although the mathematical description was considerably simpliﬁed by such choice the physical reality remains untou ched. Furthermore as it will be shown in the continuation this choice corresponds to the Cou lomb gauge. Under the above assumptions the quadratic quantum equation (24) was furthe r simpliﬁed gαβpαpβA(x) = 0,Aα= (0,Ai)≡(0,/vectorA). (54) The solutions in the Schwarzschild empty space were conside red. In that spacetime eq.(54) reads ¯h2[1 1−2m r(p0)2−(1−2m r)(p1)2−1 r2(p2)2−1 r2sin2θ(p3)2]Ai(x) = 0. (55) Let us introduce the four-momentum operator in Schwarzschi ld’s spacetime PSα= (1/radicalig 1−1 2mp0,/radicaligg 1−1 2mp1,1 rp2,1 rsinθp3)≡(E c,PSi). (56) The eq.(56) was substituted into the eq.(55). Now the Schwar zschild equation was resembled the ﬂat space one PSαPS α/vectorA(x) = 0 (57) or equivalently (E2 c2− \|/vectorPS\|2)/vectorA(x) = 0 (58) where the identity (56) was used. This equation was correspo nded in the massless case to the quadratic equation (24). In the continuation we proceed in the same way as in Sec.2. First the roots of the quadratic equation were found. From th e eq. (57) and the eq.(54) the ﬁrst root of the eq.(58) was obtained 13PS αAβ(x) =PS βAα(x) = 0. (59) The ﬁrst root equation was put in the more convenient form by c alculating the bilinear expression l=PS αAβPSαAβ=1 2PS αAβ(PSαAβ−PSβAα) =1 2(PS αAβ−PS βAα)PSαAβ(60) This expression was corresponded to the generalization of t he square of the electromagnetic ﬁeld tensor Fµνin Schwarzschild’s space. By eliminating the vanishing com ponents in the expression (60) the bilinear form was simpliﬁed PS 0AiPS0Ai+PS iAjPSiAj−PS iAjPSjAi= 0 (61) where the latin indices run from i=1,3. Here it is convenient to introduce the nabla operator generalized to Schwarzschild’s curved spacetime /vector∇S= (/radicaligg 1−1 2m∂ ∂r,1 r∂ ∂θ,1 rsinθ∂ ∂φ) =−i ¯h/vectorPS. (62) The familiar vector potential equation was obtained straig htforwardly \|/vector˙A\|=±c\|/vector∇S×/vectorA\| (63) having substituted the eq.(62) into the expression (61). If the equations (53),(58) and the eq.(63) are combined together we recognize the form (MKS) L(x,˙x) =ǫ0c2 ¯h2l=ǫ0 2(\|/vector˙A\|2−c2\|/vector∇S×/vectorA\|2) (64) as the Lagrange function of the massless ﬁeld in Schwarzschi ld’s curved spacetime. From the eq. (57) and the eq.(54) the second root of the eq.(58) was obtained PS αAα(x) =PSαAα(x) =−/vectorPS/vectorA(x) = 0. (65) By using the eq.(62) the eq.(65) was rewritten /vector∇S/vectorA(x) = 0 (66) 14as the divergence of /vectorA. The zero divergence result is a consequence of our previous choice of the reference system when the zero component of the elecro magnetic potential is set equal to zero. As it was noted previously this choice corresp onds to the Coulomb gauge in Schwarzschild’s space. Furthermore the conjugated moment um components to the vector potential coordinates were calculated Pα=ǫ0(0,˙Ai). (67) By putting together the eq.(64)and the eq.(67) the Hamilton function was obtained H(x,p) =/vectorP/vector˙A−L(x,˙x) =ǫ0\|/vector˙A\|2−ǫ0 2\|/vector˙A\|2+ǫ0c2 2\|/vector∇ ×/vectorA\|2) =ǫ0 2(\|/vector˙A\|2+c2\|/vector∇ ×/vectorA\|2) (68) From this equation together with the eq.(63) H=ǫ0\|/vector˙A\|2=\|/vectorP\|2 ǫ0(69) the familiar relation between the Hamiltonian and the ﬁeld m omentum in the dynamic case was obtained. In this case only the radiation was considered . At this point let us look back at Sec.2 basic assumptions. The fundamental quantity from whi ch the Lagrange function of the particle was found is the particle four velocity. That quant ity depends on the given curved spacetime and by knowing it we were able to obtain the scalar a nd the spinor quantum equations for that space. By further specialization to the m assless case the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian of the electromagnetic ﬁeld in the given spa cetime have been calculated. In the following the Maxwell set of equations in the Schwarzs child space will be obtained. This shows that the equations are directly connected with th e curvature of the spacetime through a fundamental quantity. This is the given spacetime four velocity. The electric ﬁeld /vectorES=−/vector˙A (70) and the magnetic ﬁeld /vectorBS=/vector∇S×/vectorA (71) 15were written as historically deﬁned. In our case the scalar p otential is equal to zero. The energy of the radiation was obtained by combining the eq.(69 ) with the equation (70) E=±c\|/vectorPS\|=±ǫ0c\|/vectorES\| (72) The ﬁrst two Maxwell equations were found by combining the eq .(66) with the eq.(70) and the eq.(71) −i ¯h/vectorPS/vectorES=−i ¯h/vectorPS/vectorBS=/vector∇S/vectorES=/vector∇S/vectorBS= 0 (73) where the relation −i ¯h/vectorPS=/vector∇Si was taken into account. By acting with the ∇S×operator on the right side of the eq.(70) the ﬁrst from the other two Max well equations emerge /vector∇S×/vectorES=−/vector∇S×/vector˙A=−∂/vectorBS ∂t. (74) The Schwarzschild operators △Sand✷Sas the obvious Laplacian and d’Alambertian oper- ators generalization were deﬁned. Then we have the expressi on /vector˙ES=−/vector¨A=△S/vectorA=∇S×(∇S×/vectorA),✷S/vectorA= 0. (75) From the eq.(75) and the eq.(71) the second from the last two M axwell equations in Schwarzschild’s spacetime was obtained /vector∇S×/vectorBS=−∂/vectorES ∂t. (76) V. THE GENERALIZED CHARGE HYPOTHESIS SPECULATIONS. ELEMENTARY PARTICLE SCHWARZSCHILD’S RADII. The curved spacetime Lagrangian with its quantum equations subject was orginated from the generalized charge concept [5]. By the generalized charge concept the Einstein principle of equivalence about the equivalence of the inert ial and the body heavy mass was generalized. The equivalence was established between the b ody electric charge and its mass. That equvalence takes place at the microscopic scale but as w ell should be extended to the 16macroscopic bodies. On the microscopic scale the generaliz ed equvalence principle is best expressed through the speciﬁc electron charge relation (MK S) e= 1.8×1011me (77) where theeandmedenote the electron electric charge and the mass respective ly. On the other side the well known Einstein relation states E=mec2. (78) By combining these two equations we arrive at the relation E=mec2=ec2 1.8×1011(79) where the microscopic contents of the generalized charge pr inciple was expressed. On the macroscopic scale it is expected that the electric charge of a body should curve the spacetime in which it is embodied in complete analogy with the body mass in general theory of rela- tivity. Thus the light ray should be curved in the presence of strong electric charge. On the contrary to the mass situation that phenomenon is more inten sive here. As an illustration we note that on the microscopic scale the ratio of these two fo rces was equal to Fel Fgr= 2.4×1039. (80) For a natural system of units instead of the MKS, in which the g eneral charge has the unique valuem=ethe above ratio was still enormous Fel Fgr= 1020. (81) Unlike the general relativity case the repulsive force was p redicted together with the attrac- tive one. If the charge sign is reversed the Doppler shift mov es from the red to the blue values. The generalized charge principle has as the extension an int eresting elementary particle concept. The concept was based upon a model of an elementary p article as a distortion of 17spacetime. Such distortion was produced by the phenomenon o f the mass or the electric charge localization. In this concept a particle and the four dimensional spacetime were inseparable. As the localization of the spacetime the eleme ntary particle and the curved spacetime are unique concept. The space around us is mostly t he ﬂat spacetime because we are often very far from particle. This is obvious in the macro scopic scale. On the microscopic scale far away from a particle the spacetime is nearly ﬂat and asymptoticaly Minkowskian. Such space corresponds to the absence of the particle. On the contrary the particle is present in the opposite case where we are near it. In the continuation one of the criteria for the presence of a particle shall be estimated. This approximate estimation was based on the generalized charge concept in Schwarzschild’s curved spac etime. Near the Schwarzschild radius, the opposite limit from that of the ﬂat spacetime eme rges. For an electron, the geometric mass coincides exactly with the Planck mass mg(Sch) =GM c2= 6.7×10−58(82) The gravitational Schwarzschild radius is far inside the el ectron radii. Here it was supposed that Schwarzschild’s radius has more general signiﬁcance b y introducing the generalized charge concept. If the electric charge instead of the mass wa s considered me(Sch) =ke c2= 1.6×10−26m. (83) When we are inside the 10−26radius close to the electron we see it as a (rotating) blackho le in the spacetime because of its electric charge. The same was true for the neutron if we are much closer to it as estimated in eq.(82). Following the same argument it was concluded that for the strong interaction the Schwarzschild radius is even much larger than the electric (or the gravitational) one. The Schwarzschild radius value is approximately close to the size of the proton (10−15m) in which case the proton should be seen as a blackhole becau se of its colour charge. On the contrary to the electric charge c ase the strong charge cannot be isolated. Consequently this is a shortrange interaction case. The proton as a blackhole remains stable and indivisible. 18The model of an elementary particle as a distorsion of spacet ime lead us to the geo- metrical Lagrangian concept (12). Moreover to the particul ar curved spacetime the corre- sponding Lagrange function is joined. Through the canonica l formalism the equation which corresponds to the Lagrange function is obtained (24,27). T his is the elementary particle equation. In the limit r→ ∞ the elementary particle as a distorsion of spacetime become s a ﬂat spacetime. In the opposite case the corresponding diﬀe rential equation (39) solutions represent the elementary particle wave functions. At the end the fundamental and direct consequence of the gene ralized charge concept as it is the existence of an interaction between the mass and the electric charge was dicussed. Such interaction was allowed to be the repulsive as well as th e attractive one. The interaction was presently considered as the weaker than the electric one . Furthermore, the interaction between the mass and the negative electric charge was consid ered as repulsive while the interaction between the positron and the mass is to the contr ary the attractive one. If so, the most stable particle states in the universe should be obt ained as a massive positive particle (the proton) together with the very light negative charged particle (the electron). This corresponds to the hydrogen atom case. 19REFERENCES [1] N.D.Birrell, P.C.W.Davies, Quantum ﬁelds in curved spa ce,(Cambridge University Press,1984). [2] H.Georgi and S.Glashow,Phys.Rev.Lett.32,438(1974). [3] R.Adler,M.Bazin,M.Schiﬀer,Introduction to General R elativity,(McGraw-Hill,1975). [4] J.Bjorken,S.Drell,R.Quantum Mechanics, R.Quantum Fi elds,(McGraw-Hill,1965). [5] M.Boˇ zin, State Intellectual Property Oﬃce,R.of Croat ia,P980280A(1998),in press. 20
arXiv:physics/0006053v1 [physics.atom-ph] 21 Jun 2000Multidimensional Mesh Approaches to Calculations of Atoms and Diatomic Molecules in Strong Electric Fields Mikhail V. Ivanov Theoretische Chemie, Physikalisch–Chemisches Institut, Universit¨ at Heidelberg, INF 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany e-mail: Mikhail.Ivanov@tc.pci.uni-heidelberg.de Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nab. Makarova 2, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia e-mail: MIvanov@MI1596.spb.edu Abstract. Fully numerical mesh solutions of 2D and 3D quantum equation s of Schr¨ odinger and Hartree-Fock type allow us to work with wav efunctions which pos- sess a very ﬂexible geometry. This ﬂexibility is especially important for calculations of atoms and molecules in strong external ﬁelds where neithe r the external ﬁeld nor the internal interactions can be considered as a perturbati on. In the framework of this method we present various approaches to calculations of qua si-steady states of these systems in strong electric ﬁelds. These approaches are aime d at obtaining precise com- plex wavefunctions and corresponding eigenvalues in the fo rmE=E0−iΓ/2, where E0is the real part of the energy and the value Γ /2 determines the lifetime of the state in relation to escape of electrons from the system. The appli cations for single-electron systems include correct solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equa tion for the H+ 2ion (energies and decay rates) and the hydrogen atom in strong parallel ele ctric and magnetic ﬁelds. Some results for the helium atom in strong electric ﬁelds are announced. I INTRODUCTION During the latter decade the interest to theoretical studie s of atoms and molecules in strong external ﬁelds was strongly motivated by experime nts with intense laser beams (electromagnetic ﬁelds with dominating electric com ponent) and astronom- ical observations of white dwarfs and neutron stars (magnet ic ﬁelds). The exper- imental availability of extremely strong electric ﬁelds in laser beams makes the theoretical study of various atomic and molecular species u nder such conditions very desirable. The properties of atomic and molecular syst ems in strong ﬁelds undergo dramatic changes in comparison with the ﬁeld-free c ase. These changesare associated with the strong distortions of the spatial di stributions of the elec- tronic density and correspondingly the geometry of the elec tronic wavefunctions. This complex geometry is diﬃcult for its description by mean s of traditional sets of basis functions and requires more ﬂexible approaches whi ch can, in particular, be provided by multi-dimensional mesh ﬁnite-diﬀerence met hods. Many results of the experiments with intense laser beams can be considered from the point of view of the behaviour of atoms and molecules in in tense static electric ﬁelds, especially when the frequency of the radiation is low . (The low-frequency behaviour and the limits of this region are analysed by [1]). The most advanced theoretical studies of eﬀects in strong el ectric ﬁelds were tra- ditionally concentrated on a hydrogen atom. Other atomic an d molecular systems in strong electric ﬁelds are much less studied. Many sophist icated theoretical meth- ods developed for the hydrogen atom cannot be simply applied for other atoms and molecules. This circumstance is an argument for developmen t of more universal theoretical and computational methods for atoms and molecu les in strong electric ﬁelds. Quasi-steady states of hydrogen atoms in strong electric ﬁe lds were studied pre- cisely in many theoretical works (see [2–11] and references therein). Some of these works are based on separation of variables in paraboli c coordinates in the Schr¨ odinger equation for the hydrogen atom. This separati on of spatial variables for atomic and molecular systems in external electric ﬁelds is possible only for one- electron atoms with the Coulomb electron-nucleus interact ion. Non-hydrogenic systems or systems with non-Coulomb interaction do not allo w this separation of variables. Their theoretical studies require a develope d technique of solving the Schr¨ odinger and similar equations with non-separable var iables. One of the possible ways for solution of this problem consists in the applicatio n of mesh computational methods for solving these equations. The mathematical prob lem consists here in so- lution of partial diﬀerential equations for systems with di screte quasi-steady states lying on the background of the continuous spectrum. In the ﬁrst part of this work we present applications of our me sh method for solving Schr¨ odinger equations with non-separable variab les for quasi-steady states. The method is based on the technique of a mesh numerical solut ion of Schr¨ odinger and Hartree-Fock equations with non-separable variables f or steady states [12–17]. The most of the applications for the discrete states was focu sed on atoms in strong magnetic ﬁelds [14–20]. In this paper we present computatio nal approaches which we have developed for quasi-steady states in external elect ric ﬁelds [21–23] and apply them to several single electron systems. At the end of t he paper we announce some of results of our current work on the helium atom in stron g electric ﬁelds.II FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM AND THE 2D MESH COMPUTATIONAL METHOD FOR STATIONARY STATES We carry out our mesh solution in the cylindrical coordinate system (ρ,φ,z ) with thez-axis oriented along the electric ﬁeld. After separation of theφcoordinate the Hamiltonians of the single-electron problems considered b elow take the form H=−1 2/parenleftBigg∂2 ∂ρ2+1 ρ∂ ∂ρ+∂2 ∂z2−m2 ρ2/parenrightBigg +szγ+m 2γ+γ2 8ρ2−1 r−Fz (1) – the hydrogen atom in parallel electric and magnetic ﬁelds a nd H=−1 2/parenleftBigg∂2 ∂ρ2+1 ρ∂ ∂ρ+∂2 ∂z2−m2 ρ2/parenrightBigg +szγ+m 2γ+γ2 8ρ2 −1 /bracketleftBig (z+R/2)2+ρ2/bracketrightBig1/2−1 /bracketleftBig (z−R/2)2+ρ2/bracketrightBig1/2−Fz (2) – the molecular ion H+ 2in electric and magnetic ﬁelds parallel to the molecular axi s. Here and in the following the atomic units me= ¯h=e= 1 will be used, including the magnetic ﬁeld strength γmeasured in units B0= ¯hc/ea2 0= 2.3505·105T,γ= B/B 0.Fis the electric ﬁeld strength multiplied by the charge of the electron. F= 1 corresponds to 51 .422V/˚A. The value mis the magnetic quantum number andsz=±1 2is the spinz-projection. Ris the internuclear distance for H+ 2molecule. The Hamiltonian (2) does not include the internuclear repul sion and its eigenvalues are the electronic energies Eewhich are connected with the total energy of H+ 2by the formula E=Ee+ 1/R. Our two-dimensional mesh computational method which we app ly for obtain- ing eigenvalues of the Hamiltonians (1) and (2) in the form su ﬃcient for case of stationary states (i.e F= 0) of single-electron systems is described in refs. [13,14 ]. For these systems highly precisely solutions can be obtaine d by solving Schr¨ odinger equations in ﬁnite spatial domains Ω (with simple boundary c onditionsψ\|∂Ω= 0 or∂ψ/∂n \|∂Ω= 0) with negligible errors for domains of reasonable dimens ions (see analytical estimations of errors in ref. [14] and results of numerical experiments in ref. [13]). When employing the Richardson’s extrapolati on of the energy values to the inﬁnitely small mesh step h→0 very precise results can be obtained on uniform meshes with relatively small numbers of nodes [13,1 4]. Two important problems have been solved for the following development of t he multi-dimensional Hartree-Fock method for many-electron systems: 1. An enhan cement of the pre- cision of single-electron wavefunctions due to their more c omplicated geometry in comparison with the one-electron case, and 2. Obtaining cor rect mesh represen- tations of Coulomb and exchange potentials. The ﬁrst of thes e problems can be solved more or less simply by means of non-uniform meshes wit h the distribution ofnodes concentrated near the nuclei. The second and most comp licated problem was initially solved in our ﬁrst works on the helium atom in magne tic ﬁelds [15,16] by means of a direct summation over the mesh nodes. But this dire ct method is very expensive with respect to the computing time and due to this r eason we obtained in the following works [17–20] these potentials as solution s of the corresponding Poisson equations. The problem of the boundary conditions f or a Poisson equation as well as the problem of simultaneously solving Poisson equ ations on the same meshes with Schr¨ odinger-like equations for the wave funct ionsψµ(z,ρ) has been discussed in ref. [16]. The simultaneous solution of the Poisson equations for the C oulomb and ex- change potentials and the Schr¨ odinger-like equations for the wave functions ψµ(z,ρ) is a complicated problem due to a diﬀerent asymptotic behavi our of the wavefunc- tions and potentials. The wavefunctions of the bound electr ons decrease exponen- tially asr→ ∞ (ris the distance from the origin). This simpliﬁes the problem of the solution of equations for wavefunctions in the inﬁnit e space because it is possible either to solve these equations in a ﬁnite domain Ω ( as described above) or otherwise to solve these equations in the inﬁnite space on meshes with expo- nentially growing distances between nodes as r→ ∞. On the contrary, solutions of Poisson equations for non-zero sums of charges decrease a s 1/rasr→ ∞. In result, every spatial restriction of the domain Ω introduce s a signiﬁcant error into the ﬁnal solution. In our approach we address the above probl ems by using special forms of non-uniform meshes [17]. Solutions to the Poisson e quation on separate meshes contain some errors δPassociated with an inaccurate description of the potential far from the nucleus. However, due to the special f orm of the function δP(˜h) for these meshes (where ˜his a formal mesh step) the errors do not show up in the ﬁnal results for the energy and other physical quantit ies, which we obtain by means of the Richardson extrapolation procedure (polyno mial extrapolation to h= 0 [13,14]). The main requirement for these meshes is a polyn omial increase of the actual mesh step h(r) whenr→ ∞. Moreover, this behaviour can be only linear one, i.e. h−1(r) =O(1/r) asr→ ∞. The error of the mesh solution in this case has the form of a polynomial of the formal step of the mesh ˜h= 1/N, where Nis the number of nodes along one of the coordinates. In practi cal calculations these meshes are introduced by means of an orthogonal coordi nate transformation from the physical coordinates xpto the mathematical ones xmmade separately for ρandz. The numerical solution is, in fact, carried out on uniform m eshes in the mathematical coordinates xm. The characteristic feature of these meshes consists of rapidly increasing coordinates of several outermost nod es when increasing the total number of nodes and decreasing the actual mesh step in t he vicinity of the origin. The methods described above for the two-dimensional case ca n be applied also to three-dimensional Schr¨ odinger and Hartree-Fock probl ems [24,25].III QUASISTATIONARY STATES The most common approach to the mathematical description of the quasista- tionary states of quantum systems consists in employment of the complex form of the energy eigenvalues E=E0−iΓ/2 where the real part of the energy E0is the centre of the band corresponding to a quasistationary state and the imaginary part Γ /2 is the half-width of the band which determines the lifetime of the state. In this approach one may consider quasistationary states of quantum systems similarly to the stationary ones. For systems (1) and (2) at F >0 the electron can leave the system in the direction of positivezand the behaviour of the wavefunction on this semi-axis dete rmines the main features of the behaviour in the external electric ﬁeld F. The mathematical problem consists in the solution of the Schr¨ odinger equati on Hψ=Eψ (3) atF >0 for resonance states which are inheritors of some discrete (atF= 0) states. The wavefunctions of these states must describe the process of separation of the electron from the system. These wavefunctions can be distin guished either by the explicit establishing the boundary condition of the outgoi ng wave or by means of a complex coordinate transformation. The latter transforms the oscillating outgoing wave into an exponentially decreasing wavefunction for whi ch the simple Dirichlet boundary condition ψ→0 asz→+∞can be established. From the mathematical point of view the problem under consid eration consists in obtaining solutions of the single-particle Schr¨ odinger e quation for this electron with FIGURE 1. The potential energy for the hydrogen atom V(ρ= 0, z) in the external uniform electric ﬁeld.the correct asymptotic behaviour of the wavefunction as an o utgoing wave. Cur- rently we have three diﬀerent possibilities for obtaining s olutions with the outgoing wave asymptotics realised in our computational program: 1. Complex boundary condition method. This method is described in detail in ref. [16,22]. The method is based on the idea that the single- electron Schr¨ odinger equation for a ﬁnite system can be solved with the arbitrary p recision in a ﬁnite area both for stationary and for quasi-stationary eigensta tes. The case of stationary states is considered in [13,14]. We discuss the approach for the quasi-stationary states following ref. [22]. Figure 1 presents the potential curve for the simplest Hamiltonian (1). Analogously to [14,27] the calculations c an be carried out in an area Ω which is ﬁnite along the direction z. For the coordinate zwe have used uniform meshes. The boundary of the area z=−Lz−forz <0 (F≥0) (Figure 1) is determined from the condition of small values o f the wavefunction on the boundary and, therefore, small perturbations introduc ed by the corresponding boundary condition [14]. The values of the wavefunction on t he opposite boundary of the area ( z=Lz+) cannot be excluded from the consideration. We consider non-stationary states corresponding to the process when an electron leaves the system in the direction z→+∞. Thus, an outgoing wave boundary condition is to be established on z=Lz+. The form of this boundary condition can be derived from the asymptotic behaviour of the wavefunction f orz→+∞. In this limit the asymptotics of the real system can be replaced by th e asymptotics of the wavefunction of a free electron in the uniform electric ﬁ eld. Solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equation for this system can be written as ψ(z) =AM(ξ)e−iΘ(ξ), ξ =/parenleftbigg z+E F/parenrightbigg (2F)1/3(4) whereM(ξ) and Θ(ξ) are the modulus and phase of the Airy function, Ais a constant [26]. The asymptotics of ψforz→+∞can be obtained from eqs. (10.4.78) and (10.4.79) of [26] in the form ψ(z) =A√πξ−1/4exp/parenleftbigg −iπ 4+i2 3ξ3/2/parenrightbigg +O/parenleftBig ξ−13/4/parenrightBig (5) Taking into account that dξ/dz = (2F)1/3andξ1/2(2F)1/3= [2(E+Fz)]1/2we have from (5) dψ dz=/parenleftbigg ik−F 2k2/parenrightbigg ψ+d dξO(ξ−13/4) (6) wherek= [2(E+Fz)]1/2is the wavenumber. Equation (6) allows us to establish the following outgoing wave boundary condition on the upper (in thezdirection) edge of the region ∂ψ ∂z+/parenleftbiggF 2k2−ik/parenrightbigg ψ/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle z=Lz+= 0 (7)This approximate boundary condition is derived from the asy mptotics of the wave- function of a free electron in a uniform electric ﬁeld and in t he limitLz+→+∞can be considered as exact one. On the other hand, our numerical e xperiments show, that errors caused by the approximate nature of this asympto tics are important only for very short regions Ω. Solving the Schr¨ odinger equa tion with the bound- ary condition (7) established on a reasonable distances Lz+from the origin of the system one obtains precise complex eigenvalues of the energ y and corresponding wavefunctions. This straightforward approach enables obtaining precise r esults both for atoms and molecules from weak to moderate strong ﬁelds (for instan ce for the ground state of the hydrogen atom up to F= 0.20−0.25 a.u.). For stronger ﬁelds the precision of this method is limited by the precision of the me sh representation of the boundary condition (7). 2. Classical complex rotation of the coordinate zin the form z→zeiΘ.Oppo- site to the boundary condition approach, this method does no t require establishing boundary conditions dependent on the energy and can be used w ith the zero bound- ary conditions for the wavefunction. This simpliﬁcation is especially important for applications to multi-electron systems. In this approach w e have obtained precise results for atomic systems in strong ﬁelds from the lower bou nd of the over-barrier regime up to super-strong ﬁelds corresponding to regime \|ReE\|<<\|ImE\|[23]. For atoms in weak ﬁelds the applicability of the method is limite d by numerical errors in the imaginary part of the energy. On the other hand, this me thod cannot be immediately applied to molecular systems in our direct mesh approach [23,28]. 3. Exterior complex transformation of the coordinate z.The exterior complex scaling [28] combines many advantages of the boundary condi tion and complex FIGURE 2. The integration paths for the complex coordinate z. Dashed line is the path at the traditional rotation z→zeiΩ. Solid line is the path corresponded to the exterior curved p ath coordinate transformation.rotation method. In its initial form [28] it consists in the c omplex rotation of a coordinate e.g. raround a point r0lying in the exterior part of the system, i.e. r→r0+ (r−r0)eiΘforr≥r0 (8) and leaves intact the Hamiltonian in the internal part of the system. The latter circumstance allows us to employ this transformation both f or atoms and molecules in arbitrary electric ﬁelds. In addition this transformati on does not contain energy- dependent boundary conditions as well as the classical comp lex rotation. On the other hand, the exterior complex scaling being introduc ed into our numeri- cal scheme in the form (8) leads to the same numerical problem s at very strong ﬁelds as well as the boundary condition method due to the nona nalytic behaviour of this transformation at the point r0(orz0in our case). In our numerical approach we solve the latter problem by mean s of a transfor- mation of the real coordinate zinto a smooth curved path in the complex plane z (Figure 2, see details in [23]). This transformation leaves intact the Hamiltonian in the internal part of the system, but supplies the complex r otation ofz(and the possibility to use the zero asymptotic boundary conditions for the wavefunction) in the external part of the system without any loss of analycity . The transformation can be applied both for atoms and molecules and provides prec ise results for ﬁelds from weak up to super-strong including the regime \|ReE\|<<\|ImE\|[23]. The three methods presented above have diﬀerent but overlap ping regions of their most eﬀective application. This allows their combine d using for the recipro- cal control in applications. The numerical results obtaine d by all three methods coincide in the limits of their applicability and are in agre ement with numerous published data on the hydrogen atom in electric ﬁelds (see e. g. [5–8]). IV SELECTED PHYSICAL RESULTS Using the boundary condition approach enables one to obtain both the values of the energy and other observables and the wavefunctions in their mesh represen- tation. An example of such a wavefunction of the ground state of the hydrogen molecular ion is presented in Figure 3. The electron energy Eeobtained as a so- lution of (3), (2) allows one to determine potential curves E(R) for the molecule as a whole by using the formula E(R) =Ee+ 1/R. These potential curves and corresponding values of Γ /2 are presented in Figure 4. One can see in Figure 4 that when growing electric ﬁeld strength the minimum on the c urveE(R) shifts to the right, becomes more shallow and ﬂat, and at Fc≈0.065 the minimum dis- appears. The dependence of the location R0of the minimum on these curves with corresponding values of the energy Eand half-widths of the level are presented in Table 1. (For comparison, at F= 0 published results for the equilibrium point are R0= 1.997193 and E=−0.6026346 [29]. For the potential curve as a whole our numerical values at F= 0 coincide with data by [30].) One can see in Table 1and Figure 4 that for the ground state of the hydrogen molecul ar ion at equilib- rium internuclear distances there is a marked probability o f its decay through the separation of the electron. Analogous calculations for two excited states 2 pπu(the lowest state with \|m\|= 1) and 3dδg(the lowest state with \|m\|= 2) [22] show that for the ﬁeld strengths at which their potential curves have m inima this process has a low probability. The critical value of the maximal electric ﬁeld Fc= 0.065a.u.= 3.3V/˚A when the molecule H+ 2can exist is in a good agreement with experimental results by Bucksbaum et al[31]. According this work H+ 2molecule may exist in laser beam ﬁelds with intensity less than 1014W/cm2which corresponds to 3V /˚A, and does not exist in more intensive ﬁelds. Other theoretical explanations of the rupture of H+ 2molecule in intensive laser FIGURE 3. Real and imaginary parts of the wavefunction of the H+ 2molecule in a longitudinal electric ﬁeld F(a.u.). FIGURE 4. Left – Potential curves for the ground state of the H+ 2molecule in the longitudinal electric ﬁeld F(a.u.). Right – Half-widths of the ground state energy level of the molecule H+ 2in the longitudinal electric ﬁeld Fas a function of the internuclear distance R(a.u.).TABLE 1. Equilibrium internuclear distances and corresponding en- ergies and half-widths of the energy of the ground state of H+ 2molecule in longitudinal electric ﬁelds. F R 0 E0 Γ/2F R 0 E0 Γ/2 0.00 1.997 -0.60264 — 0.04 2.062 -0.60686 1.23(-19) 0.01 2.001 -0.60289 — 0.05 2.112 -0.60943 7.32(-15) 0.02 2.012 -0.60366 — 0.06 2.198 -0.61285 1.49(-11) 0.03 2.031 -0.60497 — 0.065 2.28 -0.61501 3.94(-10) beam ﬁelds in works [31–33] were based on conception of defor mation of potential curves which results in coupling of the ground state 1 sσgwith 2pσustate [32]. This results in a possibility of rupture of the molecule after abs orption some photons. On the other hand, the results obtained above enable us to ana lyse this process from simpler point of view. When the frequency of the radiati on is low enough the consideration of the process as extension and rupture of the molecule in a strong static electric ﬁeld is a quite adequate model [1,32]. The co nception of coupling states might be substituted by an exact numerical calculati on of one (as it was done above) or several (if several states are considered) de pendencies E(R). This numerical calculation is equivalent to a traditional calcu lation of the energy of the state when taking into account coupling with all the states o f the same symmetry (corresponding to the symmetry of the initial physical prob lem). The calculations presented above were carried out for the gr ound state of 2D Hamiltonian. In fact, our method is not restricted by these s tates. Computa- FIGURE 5. Left – The electron energies Eeof 2sσgand 3dσgstates of the H+ 2molecular ion as functions of the internuclear distance Rin the ﬁeld-free space (broken), in the magnetic ﬁeld γ= 0.02 parallel to the molecular axis (full) and in the electric ﬁ eldF= 0.002 parallel to the molecular axis (dotted). Right – Ee(F) for the doublet of 2 sσgand 3 dσgstates of H+ 2at R= 4.0536a.u. for γ= 0 (broken) and γ= 0.02 (full).TABLE 2. The ground state of the hydrogen atom in parallel electric an d magnetic ﬁelds atF= 0.1,1,5. F= 0.1 F= 1 F= 5 γ E 0 Γ/2 E0 Γ/2 E0 Γ/2 0 −0.5274183 7 .26904( −3)−0.6243366 0 .6468208 −0.1350071 3 .083929 0.01−0.532390 7 .2624(−3)−0.629329 0 .646812 −0.140005 3 .083925 0.1−0.574600 6 .6392(−3)−0.673584 0 .646053 −0.184739 3 .083589 1 −0.8443098 9 .5923(−5)−1.0421379 0 .577291 −0.6077008 3 .050207 10 −1.7498730 — −1.9579187 0 .1173924 −2.375552 1 .955678 100 −3.790110 — −3.8219215 4 .9988(−5)−4.3806709 0 .4909467 1000 −7.66247 — −7.66807 — −7.82561 1 .04701( −2) tional algorithms of our program of atomic and molecular mes h calculations AT- MOLMESH are constructed so that calculations are being carr ied out for a state with prescribed spatial symmetry and with the electron ener gy nearest to the given initial approximation Eb. Thus, there is no diﬀerence between calculations for the ground and for excited states and calculations can be fulﬁll ed for various states of the same spatial symmetry including even degenerate states (when applying some special technical methods). For instance, potential curve s 2sσgand 3dσgof the ﬁeld-free H+ 2have exact crossing near R= 4.05 [30]. In magnetic ﬁelds parallel to the molecular axis this pair of states forms an avoided cro ssing. Our method permits calculations for both exact and avoided crossings a tF= 0 as well as at F/negationslash= 0 as presented in Figure 5. The second singe-electron system which we present here is th e hydrogen atom in parallel electric and magnetic ﬁelds [23]. Some numbers obt ained for this system are shown in Table 2. 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 F−2.26−2.24−2.22−2.20−2.18−2.16−2.14E 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 F10−610−510−410−310−210−1Γ/2 FIGURE 6. Left – The total energies of 21S0state of the helium atom dependent on the electric ﬁeld strength. Right – Half-widths of this energy level.Concluding this section we announce some preliminary resul ts on the helium atom in strong electric ﬁelds. These results are obtained in a multi-conﬁgurational (CI) mesh calculation. The calculations for separate meshe s are analogous to de- scribed above and are carried out by means of the curved path e xterior complex transformation. Our preliminary results for the ground sta te of the helium atom agree with data from recent works [34,35]. Our results for th e excited state 21S0 are shown in Figure 6. V CONCLUSIONS In this communication we have presented a 2D fully numerical mesh solution approach to calculations for atoms and simple diatomic mole cules in strong ex- ternal electric and magnetic ﬁelds. For single-electron sy stems in external electric ﬁelds we can apply three diﬀerent methods of calculation of t he complex energy eigenvalues for atom-like systems and two methods for molec ules. These methods have diﬀerent but overlapping regions of their most eﬀectiv e application. This al- lows their combined using for the reciprocal control in appl ications. The complex boundary condition method is the most straightforward and i s the most reliable in this sense. For relatively weak ﬁelds it allows obtaining results on the meshes with the lesser number of nodes than the curved path complex t ransformation. On the other hand, the boundary condition method loses its prec ision and stability at extremely strong electric ﬁelds and, second, this method co ntain the energy of the electron in its formulation. The latter feature can be some o bstacle in its applica- tion to problems more complicated than the single-electron Schr¨ odinger equation. The curved path complex transformation method is the most ge neral of the three and the most prospective for the following applications. Th e only shortage of this method is that this is less precise and less stable for the ato m-like systems at extremely strong electric ﬁelds ( \|ImE\|>>\|ReE\|) than the traditional complex rotation. Thus, the latter method is the most convenient for atom-like systems at such extremely strong ﬁelds. The mathematical technique developed for solving Schr¨ odi nger equations for quasi-steady states allowed us to obtain a series of results for the hydrogen atom in parallel electric and magnetic ﬁelds and for the H+ 2ion in strong electric ﬁelds. The following applications of these methods are associated wit h the CI approach which is now in the process of development and testing on the proble m of the helium atom in strong electric ﬁelds. We present preliminary resul ts for the 21S0state of this atom. REFERENCES 1. Keldysh L. V., Sov. Phys. – JETP, 47 (1964) 1945. 2. Benassi L. and Grecchi V., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys., 13 (19 80) 911. 3. Franceschini V., Grecchi V. and Silverstone H. J., Phys. R ev. A, 32 (1985) 1338.4. Froelich P. and Br¨ andas E., Int. J. Quantum Chem., S10 (19 76) 1577. 5. Kolosov V. V., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys., 20 (1987) 2359. 6. Kolosov V. V., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 22 (1989) 833 . 7. Nicolaides C. A. and Themelis S. I., Phys. Rev. A, 45 (1992) 349. 8. Nicolaides C. A. and Gotsis H. J., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. P hys., 25 (1992) L171. 9. Alijah A. and von Hopﬀgarten A., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Ph ys., 27 (1994) 843. 10. Rao J., Liu W. and Li B., Phys. Rev. A, 50 (1994) 1916. 11. Silverman J. N. and Nicolaides C. A., Chem. Phys. Lett., 1 53 (1988) 61. 12. Anokhin S. B. and Ivanov M. V., Sov. Phys. – Solid State, 24 (1982) 1979. 13. Ivanov M. V., USSR Comput. Math. & Math. Phys., 26 (1986) 1 40. 14. Ivanov M. V., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 21 (1988) 447 . 15. Ivanov M. V., Opt. Spektrosk., 70 (1991) 259; English tra nsl.: Opt. Spectrosc., 70 (1991) 148. 16. Ivanov M. V., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 27 (1994) 451 3. 17. Ivanov M. V., Phys. Lett. A, 239 (1998) 72. 18. Ivanov M. V. and Schmelcher P., Phys. Rev. A, 57 (1998) 379 3. 19. Ivanov M. V. and Schmelcher P., Phys. Rev. A, 60 (1999) 355 8. 20. Ivanov M. V. and Schmelcher P., Phys. Rev. A, 61 (2000) 022 505. 21. Ivanov M. V., Opt. Spektrosk., 76 (1994) 711; English tra nsl.: Opt. Spectrosc., 76 (1994) 631. 22. Ivanov M. V., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 31 (1998) 283 3. 23. Ivanov M. V. to be published. 24. Ivanov M. V., Sov. Phys. Semicond., 19 (1985) 1167. 25. Ivanov M. V., Opt. Spectrosc., 83 (1997) 23. 26. Abramowitz M. and Stegun I.A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions, (Dover Pub- lications, New York) 1972. 27. Anokhin S. B. and Ivanov M. V. Vestn. Leningr. Univ. Fiz. & Khim., no.2 (1983) 65. 28. Simon B., Phys. Lett. A, 71 (1979) 211. 29. Bishop D. M., J. Chem. Phys., 53 (1970) 1541. 30. Sharp T. E., Atomic Data, 2 (1971) 119. 31. Bucksbaum P. H., Zavriyev A., Muller H. G. and Schumacher D. W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 64 (1990) 1883. 32. Codling K. and Frasinski L. J., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Ph ys., 26 (1993) 783. 33. Yang B., Saeed M., DiMauro L. F., Zavriyev A. and Bucksbau m P. H., Phys. Rev. A, 44 (1991) R1458. 34. Scrinzi A., Geissler M. and Brabec T. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83 (1999) 706. 35. Themelis S. I., Mercouris T. and Nicolaides C. A. Phys. Re v. A, 61 (2000) 024101.
arXiv:physics/0006054v1 [physics.ins-det] 22 Jun 2000EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR OF DIFFERENT SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS IN HADRON FIELDS I.Lazanua, S.Lazanuband M.Bruzzic aUniversity of Bucharest, Faculty of Physics, P.O.Box MG-11 , Bucharest-Magurele, Romania, electronic address: ilaz@s cut.ﬁzica.unibuc.ro bNational Institute for Materials Physics, P.O.Box MG-7, Bu charest-Magurele, Romania, electronic address: lazanu@alpha1.inﬁm.ro cUniversita di Firenze, Dipartimento di Energetica, Via S. M arta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy, electronic address: bruzzi@ﬁ.infn.it Abstract The utilisation of semiconductor materials as detectors an d devices operating in high radiation environments, at the future particle colliders, in space applications or in medicine and industry, necessitates to obtain radiation ha rder materials. A system- atic theoretical study has been performed, investigating t he interaction of charged hadrons with semiconductor materials and the mechanisms of defect creation by irradiation. The mechanisms of the primary interaction of t he hadron with the nu- cleus of the semiconductor lattice have been explicitly mod elled and the Lindhard theory of the partition between ionisation and displacemen ts has been considered. The behaviour of silicon, diamond, and some AIIIBVcompounds, as GaAs, GaP, InP, InAs, InSb has been investigated. The nuclear energy lo ss, and the concentra- tion of primary defects induced in the material bulk by the un it hadron ﬂuence have been calculated. The peculiarities of the proton and pion in teractions as well as the speciﬁc properties of the semiconductor material have been put in evidence. PACS : 61.80.Az: Theory and models of radiation eﬀects. 61.82.-d: Radiation eﬀects on speciﬁc materials. Key words: hadrons, radiation damage, diamond, silicon, AIIIBVsemiconductors Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 2 February 20081 Introduction The crystalline materials for semiconductor devices used i n high ﬂuences of particles are strongly aﬀected by the eﬀects of radiation. A fter the interaction between the incoming particle and the target, mainly two cla sses of degra- dation eﬀects are observed: surface and bulk material damag e, due to the displacement of atoms from their sites in the lattice. For el ectrons and gam- mas the eﬀects are dominantly at the surface, while the heavy particles (pions, protons, neutrons, ions) produce both types of damages. Up to now, in spite of the experimental and theoretical eﬀort s, the problems related to the behaviour of the semiconductor materials in r adiation ﬁelds, the identiﬁcation of the induced defects and their characteris ation, as well as the explanation of the degradation mechanisms are still open pr oblems. The utilisation of semiconductor materials as detectors an d devices operating in high radiation environments, at the future particle coll iders, in space appli- cations, in medicine and industry, makes necessary to obtai n radiation harder materials. The diamond and diﬀerent AIIIBVcompounds (GaAs, GaP, InP, InAs, InSb) are in principle, possible competitors for silicon to diﬀer ent electronic devices. In the present paper a systematic theoretical study of the ex pected behaviour of these semiconductor materials in hadron ﬁelds (protons a nd pions) is pre- sented. All analysed materials have a zinc-blend crystalline struc ture. Silicon is at the base of electronic industry, diamond and the AIIIBVcompounds present attractive electrical and/or luminescence properties [1] , of interest for diﬀerent applications. 2 Interaction of charged hadrons with semiconductor materi als and mechanisms of defect creation by irradition The charged particles interact with both atomic and electro nic systems in a solid. The total rate of energy loss, as a function of distanc e, is called the stopping power. This one could, in general, be divided artiﬁ cially into two components, the nuclear and the electronic part: /parenleftBig −dE dx/parenrightBig total=/parenleftBig −dE dx/parenrightBig nuclear+/parenleftBig −dE dx/parenrightBig electronic Roughly speaking, the energy lost due to interactions with e lectrons gives rise to material ionisation, while the energy lost in interactio ns with nuclei is to 2the origin of defect creation. A comprehensive theoretical treatment of electronic stopp ing which covers all energies of interest cannot be formulated simply because of diﬀerent approxi- mations concerning both the scattering and contribution of diﬀerent electrons in the solid. For fast particles with velocities higher then the orbital velocities of the electron, the Bethe-Bloch formula is to be used [2]. At lower velocities, inner electrons have velocities greater than particle velo city, and therefore do not contribute to the energy loss. This regime was modelled b y Lindhard and Scharﬀ [3]. If the particle has a positive charge, and a velocity close to the orbital velocity of its outer electrons, it has a high probability of capturin g an electron from one of the atoms of the medium through which it passes. This proce ss contributes to the total inelastic energy loss since the moving ion has to expend energy in the removal of the electrons which it captures. The nuclear stopping depends on the detailed nature of the at omic scattering, and this in turn depends intimately on the form of the interac tion potential. At low energies, a realistic potential based on the Thomas-Fer mi approximation was used in the literature [3] and at higher energies, where s cattering results from the interaction of unscreened nuclei, a Rutherford col lision model is to be used. In Figure 1, the nuclear stopping power calculated for proto ns and pions in diamond, silicon and GaAs is represented, as a function of th e kinetic energy of the particle. The nuclear stopping power is greater for he avier incident particles (protons compared with pions), and for lighter me dia (diamond in comparison with silicon and GaAs). The position of its maxim um is the same for protons and pions in the same medium. The process of partitioning the energy of the recoil nuclei ( produced due the interaction of the incident particle with the nucleus, plac ed in its lattice site) by new interaction processes, between electrons (ionisation ) and atomic motion (displacements) is considered in the frame of Lindhard theo ry [4]. The mechanism considered in the study of the interaction bet ween the incom- ing particle and the solid, by which bulk defects are produce d, is the following: the particle, heavier than the electron, with electrical ch arge or not, interacts with the electrons and with the nuclei of the crystalline lat tice. The nuclear interaction produces the bulk defects. As a result of the int eraction, depending on the energy and on the nature of the incident particle, one o r more light particles are formed, and usually one or more heavy recoil nu clei. These nuclei have charge and mass numbers lower or at least equal with the m edium. After this interaction process, the recoil nucleus or nuclei, if t hey have suﬃcient en- ergy, are displaced from the lattice positions in interstit ials. Thus, the primary 3knock-on nucleus, if its energy is large enough, can produce the displacement of a new nucleus, and the process can continue as a cascade, un til the energy of the nucleus becomes lower than the threshold for atomic di splacements. Be- cause of the regular nature of the crystalline lattice, the d isplacement energy is anisotropic. In the present model, averaged values for di splacement ener- gies have been considered. In the concrete evaluation of def ect production, the nuclear interactions must be modelled, see for example [ 5–7]. The primary interaction between the hadron and the nucleus of the lattic e presents charac- teristics reﬂecting the peculiarities of the hadron, espec ially at relatively low energies. If the inelastic process is initiated by nucleons , the identity of the incoming projectile is lost, and the creation of secondary p articles is associ- ated with energy exchanges which are of the order of MeV or lar ger. For pion nucleus processes, the absorption, the process by which the pion disappears as a real particle, is also possible. The energy dependence of cross sections, for proton and pion interaction with the nucleus, present very diﬀerent behaviours: the proton- nucleus cross sec- tions decrease with the increase of the projectile energy, t hen have a minimum at relatively low energies, followed by a smooth increase, w hile the pion nu- cleus cross sections present for all processes a large maxim um, at about 160 MeV, reﬂecting the resonant structure of interaction (the ∆ 33resonance pro- duction), followed by other resonances, at higher energies , but with much less importance. Due to the multitude of open channels in these pr ocesses, some simplifying hypothesis have been done [8]. The physical quantity that characterise the primary defect s is the concentra- tion of primary radiation induced defects on the unit partic le ﬂuence (CPD) [6]. This quantity permits the correlation of damages produ ced in diﬀerent materials at the same kinetic energy of the incident hadron. For the compar- ison of the eﬀects of diﬀerent particles in the same semicond uctor material, the non ionising energy loss (NIEL) is useful. 3 Theoretical expected material behaviour The behaviour of these materials in proton ﬁelds is characte rised by the CPD. In Figure 2, the dependence of the CPD as a function of the prot ons kinetic energy and medium mass number (diamond, silicon, GaAs and In P) is pre- sented - see references [5,9] and references cited therein. Low kinetic energy protons produce higher degradation in all materials. For pion induced degradation, the energy dependence of CPD a nd NIEL presents two maxima, the relative importance of which depen ds on the tar- get mass number: one in the region of the ∆ 33resonance, more pronounced 4for light elements and compounds containing light elements , and another one around 1 GeV kinetic energy, more pronounced for heavy eleme nts. At higher energies, an weak energy dependence is observed, and a gener al dependence of the NIEL can be approximated [8,10]. In Figure 3a, the CPD for all these ma- terials is represented as a function of the pion kinetic ener gy and of material average mass number. These materials could be separated into two classes, the ﬁrs t with monoatomic materials or materials with relatively close mass numbers, and the second comprising binary materials with remote mass numbers of the elements. In Figures 3b and 3c respectively, the energy and mass number de pendence of the CPD for the two groups of materials are represented separ ately. A slow variation of the primary defect concentration has bee n found for pion irradiation of diamond, silicon, GaP and GaAs, in the whole e nergy range of interest, with less than 2 displacements/cm/unit of ﬂuen ce. In contrast to this situation, GaP, InAs and InSb are characterised by a low CPD in the energy range up to 200 MeV, followed by a pronounced increase of displace- ment concentration, to more than 8 displacements/cm/unit o f ﬂuence at high energies. 4 Summary A systematic theoretical study has been performed, investi gating the inter- action of charged hadrons with semiconductor materials and the mechanisms of defect creation by irradiation. The mechanisms of the pri mary interaction of the hadron with the semiconductor nucleus lattice have be en explicitly modelled and the Lindhard theory of the partition between io nisation and displacements has been considered. The nuclear stopping power is greater for heavier incident p articles (protons compared with pions), and for lighter media (diamond in comp arison with silicon and GaAs). The position of its maximum is the same for protons and pions in the same medium. The behaviour of these materials in hadron ﬁelds is characte rised by the CPD and NIEL. For protons, the low kinetic energy protons produce higher d egradation in all materials. For pion induced degradation, the energy dependence of CPD a nd NIEL presents two maxima, the relative importance of which depen ds on the tar- 5get mass number: one in the region of the ∆ 33resonance, more pronounced for light elements and compounds containing light elements , and another one around 1 GeV kinetic energy, more pronounced for heavy eleme nts. At higher energies, an weak energy dependence is observed. A slow vari ation of the pri- mary defect concentration has been found for pion irradiati on of diamond, silicon, GaP and GaAs, in the whole energy range of interest, with less than 2 displacements/cm/unit of ﬂuence. In contrast to this situ ation, GaP, InAs and InSb are characterised by a low CPD in the energy range up t o 200 MeV, (which represent the energy range up to their utilisation in pion ﬁeld is rec- ommended), followed by a pronounced increase of displaceme nt concentration to more than 8 displacements/cm/unit of ﬂuence at high energ ies. References [1] P. Baranski, I. Potykevitch, V. Klotchkov, Electroniqu e des semiconducteurs: Propri´ et´ es des mat´ eriaux, (Editions Mir, Moscou, 1978) . [2] C. Caso et. al., Eur. J. Phys. C3, 1 (1998). [3] J. Lindhard and M. Scharﬀ, Phys. Rev. 124, 128 (1961). [4] J. Lindhard, V. Nielsen, M. Scharﬀ, P. V. Thomsen, Mat. Ph ys. Medd. Dan Vid. Sesk. 33, 1 (1963). [5] I. Lazanu, S. Lazanu, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Reseac h, A432, 374 (1999). [6] I. Lazanu, S. Lazanu, E. Borchi, M. Bruzzi, Nucl. Instr. a nd Meth. Phys. Reseach, A406, 259 (1998). [7] S. Lazanu, I. Lazanu, U. Biggeri, E. Borchi, M. Bruzzi, in Conf. Proc. Vol. 59, ”Nuclear Data for Science and Technology”, Eds. G. Reﬀo, A. V entura and C. Gradi (SIF, Bologna, 1997) p.1528. [8] S. Lazanu, I. Lazanu, U. Biggeri, S. Sciortino, Nucl. Ins tr. and Meth. Phys. Reseach, A413, 242 (1998). [9] S. Lazanu, I. Lazanu, U. Biggeri, E. Borchi, M. Bruzzi, Pr oc. Supp. of Balkan Phys. Lett., vol. 5, 1111 (1997). [10] S. Lazanu, I. Lazanu, Analytical approximations of the Lindhard equations describing radiation eﬀects, e-preprint LANL hep-ph/9910 317, submitted to Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. A. [11] A. van Ginneken, preprint Fermilab, FN-522(1989). [12] G. P. Summers, E. A. Burke, P. Shapiro, S. R. Messenger, R . J. Walters, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., NS-40, 1372 (1990). 6Figure captions Figure 1: Nuclear stopping power of protons and pions in diam ond, silicon and GaAs. Figure 2: The concentration of primary induced defects for u nit of ﬂuence (CPD) in diamond, silicon, GaAs and InP by protons. The mesh s urfaces are drawn only to guide the eye only. The discontinuity in the sur face represent the behaviour. The data for proton - diamond are from [5], the silicon data are averaged values from [11] and [12], and that for GaAs and I nP are from [12]. Figure 3a: The energy and material dependence of the concent ration of pri- mary defects on unit pion ﬂuence in diamond, silicon, GaP, Ga As, InP, InAs and InSb. The mesh surfaces are plotted for guide the eyes. Th e diﬀerences in the behaviour of these materials are clearly suggested by th e discontinuity in the mesh surface. Figure 3b: The energy and material dependence of the concent ration of pri- mary defects on unit pion ﬂuence, induced by pions in diamond , silicon, GaAs and InSb. The mesh surfaces are drawn to guide the eyes. A pron ounced max- imum, corresponding to the ∆ 33resonance is clearly visible, and the second maximum at higher energies is important especially for InSb . Figure 3c: The same as in Figure 3b, but for GaP, InP and InAs. T he eﬀects of the ∆ 33resonance are less pronounced in respect to the eﬀects of the inelastic region, at high energies. 710 -510 -410 -310 -210 -110 0 Particle Kinetic Energy [MeV]0100200300400500Nuclear Stopping Power [MeV cm2/g] p / C p / Si p / GaAs pi / C pi /Si pi / GaAs00.511.522.53 020406080-2-10123 lg(E [MeV])Alg(CPD [1/cm])12345 050100150-2-1.5-1-0.500.51 lg(E [MeV])Alg(CPD [1/cm])12345 050100150-2-1.5-1-0.500.51 log(E [MeV])Alg(CPD [1/cm])12345 406080100120-1-0.500.51 lg(E [MeV])Alg(CPD [1/cm]
arXiv:physics/0006055v1 [physics.bio-ph] 22 Jun 2000Statistical Measure of a Gene Evolution: The Case of Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Gene S. Chattopadhyay⋆, S. Sahoo†and J. Chakrabarti⋆ ⋆Department of Theoretical Physics Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Calcutta 700 032, INDIA †Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 23-166 Taipei, Taiwan 10764, Republic of CHINA 1Abstract The enzyme Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GA PDH) catalyses the decom- position of glucose. The gene that produces the GAPDH is ther efore present in a wide class of organisms. We show that for this gene the average value of t he ﬂuctuations in nucleotide distribution in the codons, normalized to strand bias, prov ides a reasonable measure of how the gene has evolved in time. PACS numbers: 87.10.+e, 87.15.-v, 05.40.+j 2Evolution makes lower organisms into higher ones. The distr ibution of the nucleotides in the genes that code for proteins undergo changes in the process. It is s ometimes assumed these variations in the nucleotide distributions come about due to random mutation s. In this work we present quantitative evidence that the changes in the bases of the GAPDH are remark ably well ordered. The DNA sequence that codes for a single protein evolves as we go from one organism to the next. The evolution of the base composition of A, T, G and C for the same protein is the key to the dynamics of biological evolution. Some proteins are restri cted to few organisms, others are more com- mon. Amongst these proteins / enzymes, the glyceraldeyde-3 -phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is present in all living organisms, as the key enzyme in glycoly sis, the common pathway both in organ- isms that live in free oxygen and the ones that do not. The GAPD H catalyzes the dehydrogenation and phosphorylation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to for m 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate. The nature of the base organisation of the DNA sequences and t he direction of the changes due to evolution have been studied in the recent years [1]. The fr actal correlations of1 fβtype have been reported. These fractal correlations are more pronounced f or the introns and the intergenic ﬂanks. The exons, on the other hand, are characterised by strong pea k at f=1 3in the power spectrum. Here we work only with the exon regions and attempt to isolate the physical quantity that provides insights into the nature of evolution in the GAPDH. With this in mind we picked the DNA sequences coding for the GA PDH enzyme from a wide variety of prokaryotes (the lower organisms) and eukaryote s (roughly the higher organisms). 3Zuckerkandl and Pauling [2] laid the basis for the study of ge nes and proteins for evolution. Over the years there have been the search for the universal common ancestor [3] that may have preceded the prokaryotes and the eukaryotes. The studies on the ribos omal RNA provided some of the in- sights [4]. The relative importance of the elements, such as mutations, lateral gene transfer [5], that drive the evolution of species continues to be under active i nvestigation. In our work here with the GAPDH we try to isolate the physical quantity (called X) that measures the evolution in this gene. 4Number Fluctuations The coding sequences of the GAPDH genes from 42 diﬀerent spec ies, with 31 eukaryotes and 11 prokaryotes, were chosen. These sequences have diﬀerent di stribution of the bases A, T, G and C. Since the codons are made of 3 of these bases, we divide the seq uence into codons, i.e. choose the window size 3 bases long. On these windows of size 3, we compute the square of the number s of A, T, G and C and deﬁne N(3) as: N(3) = n2 A(3) +n2 T(3) +n2 G(3) +n2 C(3) where n2 A(3),n2 T(3),n2 G(3),n2 C(3) are the numbers of A, T, G and C respectively in the codon wi ndow of size 3. Thus if, for instance, A occurs in all the three positi ons we get N(3)=9. If two are identical we get N(3)=4+1=5. If all the positions are occupied by diﬀeren t nucleotides, we get N(3)=1+1+1=3. Thus N(3), for the window size 3, varies from 3 to 9 as we go from one codon to the next along the gene. We then compute the average value of N(3), call it < N(3)>, over the sequence. We notice here that a high value of < N(3)>implies repeats of the bases. This means persistent sort of correlation amongst the bases. In other words, higher value of< N(3)>implies a higher probability that the A, for instance, is going to be followed by the A. Conv ersely a lower value of < N(3)> implies an antipersistent order in the sequence leading to a lower probability for the A to be followed immediately by the A. 5What do we expect for < N(3)>for the random sequence of identical strand bias? Strand bia s is the proportion of A, T, G and C in the sequence. These proporti ons vary as we go from one GAPDH sequence to another. We want to isolate the eﬀect above and be yond the strand bias, therefore, study the quantity X deﬁned as: X=< N(3)> < N(3, r)>(1) where < N(3, r)>is the average value of the quantity deﬁned in (6) for the rand om sequence of identical total length and strand bias. < N(3)>is measured for the sequences, while < N(3, r)>is calculated using a 4-dimensional walk [6,7] model. Hence the quantity X is obtained. To calculate < N(3, r)>consider the following walk model in 4-dimensions correspo nding to A, T, G and C. If we encounter the symbol i (i=A, T, G and C) we move o ne step along i. In this directed walk the probability function for a single step cle arly is : P1(x) =/summationdisplay ipiδ(xi−1) (2) where x ≡(xA,xT,xG,xC), and p i=ni N; niis the number of times the symbol i appears in the sequence; N is the total number of symbols, i.e. the length of the sequen ce. We want to get the distributions after m steps, and therefore, deﬁne the characteristic func tion of the single step: ˜P1(k) =/summationdisplay ipieiki. (3) 6For m steps: ˜Pm(k) = [/summationdisplay ipieiki]m(4) The quantity m is clearly the total number of steps, i.e. the w indow size. The moments of the distribution may be obtained by diﬀerentiating ˜Pm(k) with respect to k. In particular < N(3, r)> is just the second moment of distribution and obtained from ˜Pm(k): < N(3, r)>= [/summationdisplay i∂2˜Pm(k) ∂k2 i]ki→0 (5) Using (4) and (5), we get: < N(3, r)>=m[(m−1)/summationdisplay p2 i+ 1] (6) where we have used the relation/summationtextpi= 1. To crosscheck this relation, let us ﬁrst set p A=1; p T=pG=pC=0. This is the case of maximal persistence. All the three bases, in this limit, are identic al. From (6), we ﬁnd: < N(3, r)>= 9, (7) as we expect. To check again set p A=pT=pG=pC=1 4. The average value, from (6), gives: < N(3, r)>= 4.5 (8) For the window size m=3 the possible choices consistent with pA=pT=pG=pC=1 4are 4x4x4=64, namely, the 61 codons + 3 stop codons. Calculation of the < N(3, r)>for these 64 combinations is 7straightforward and gives the value 4.5 in agreement with (8 ). Nucleotide Sequence Comparison The pairwise sequence alignment tool [8] available in the pu blic domain gives a measure of the ‘‘distance′′(or the cross correlations) between the sequences. These di stances provide additional data towards the study of evolution in the GAPDH gene. In the usual studies of evolution and phylogeny one relies ex clusively on nucleotide sequence comparison. The rules used for alignment of sequences are co nstructed to give rise to the known pattern. In contrast, the change in the value of the X appears to us as th e physical quantity of interest in the evolution in the GAPDH gene. The nucleotide sequence c omparison we use in this work as supplementary, supportive data. The X of Evolution The X values for the eukaryotes and the prokaryotes, for the G APDH, for window size of 3, are given in Table 1. Interestingly, the table 1 suggests two parallel lines of ev olution, one for the prokaryotes; the other for the eukaryotes. Note the value of the X for the cyano bacterial genes is closer to that for the amphibian gene. The eubacterial and archaebacterial va lues are more or less the same as those 8for ﬁsh, and higher invertebrates such as arthropods. As we look separately amongst the prokaryotes and the eukary otes the X values increase as follows: Prokaryota: proteobacteria < archaebacteria < eubacteria < cyanobacte ria Eukaryota: fungus < invertebrate < fish < amphibia < bird < mammal (excl. human )< human It is to be remembered that in arriving at this increasing pat tern the average value of the X over the members of the group has been considered. Within each gro up there are variations in the X (see Table 1). Assume now the GAPDH gene began from common universal ancest or. The route diverged to give proteobacteria on one side; fungal and invertebrate ge nes on the other. The proteobacterial gene develops further into three, archaebacterial, eubact erial and cyanobacterial, genes. The other trail from the fungus goes through ﬁsh, amphibia, probably r eptilia for which the data is unavailable, birds and other mammals to reach its peak on humans. Sequence Comparison The pairwise alignment tool gives a measure of similarity, o r distance, between the various GAPDH genes under consideration (Figure 1). The results are fairly consistent with the picture that emer ges from the study of the X. It suggests that the eukaryotic GAPDH genes might have originated from p roteobacterial or eubacterial genes 9[9]. The alignment tool also suggests that both archaebacteria a nd cyanobacteria may be quite distant from all other groups [10,11]. As we measure the sequence sim ilarity of the archaebacterial and the cyanobacterial genes with genes from the other two prokaryo tic groups, we ﬁnd the eubacterial gene closer to them than the proteobacterial one. This too suppor ts the view obtained from the X values of the prokaryotes. The X Evolution of the GAPDH Exon The plot of X for eukaryotes against their approximate perio d of origin in the geological time scale (Table 2) gives a fairly linear ﬁt. The slope: Keuk=∆X ∆T= 1.14×10−4(myr)−1, (9) where myr ≡million years. The earliest lifeforms are thought to come about around 3500 million years before present (myr BP). Presently we presume them as the proteobacterial ones. If th e slope of the prokaryotic GAPDH gene X-evolution is assumed close to that for the eukaryotes, (9) , then the cyanobacteria must have arisen ∆T=K−1 euk[Xcyano−Xproteo]≈460 ( myr) (10) after the proteobacteria. In myr BP this is 3500-460=3040. S imilarly, the periods of origin of the eubacteria and the archaebacteria may be arrived at, and giv en in Table 3 and Figure 2. 10Fossil stromatolites are macroscopic structures produced by some species of cyanobacteria. These are believed to occur from the early Precambrian (i.e., 3000 myr BP) to the Recent period [12]. This is in good agreement with (10) for the time of origin of cyanob acteria obtained from the X-evolution. For an alternate approach assume the cyanobacteria appeare d around 3000 myr BP, and the proteobacteria 3500 myr BP. The rate of change of the X, i.e. Kpro=Xcyano−Xproteo ∆T= 1.05×10−4(myr BP )−1(11) Thus the slope of the prokaryotic GAPDH gene X-evolution (11 ) comes out to be nearly identical to that for the eukaryotes (9). Figure 3 shows the best linear ﬁt s for the prokaryotes and the eukaryotes, which appear as two almost parallel lines. For the GAPDH exon the quantity X rises uniformly on two paral lel paths - one for the prokary- otes; the other for the eukaryotes. The uniformity of rise in the X with time implies the genetic evolution is well-ordered; not the result of some random mut ations. The rise of the X implies the trend towards persistent correl ations in the base arrangement of codons. That is, as we go up the ladder of evolution the probab ility that a nucleotide, for instance the A is followed by the A increases. Note the result is true fo r the window of size 3. Whether the increase in persistence continues for any window size remai ns outside the scope of our analysis. The 11increase in persistence in the window of size 3 gives a measur e of the complexity of the sequences at this scale [13]. For the archaebacteria the sequence comparisons indicate t hat they are more or less equally distant from the other prokaryotes and the eukaryotes. Yet t he X-measure of the archaebacteria places them between the proteobacteria and the eubacteria. The ordered, uniform X-evolution of the GAPDH exon allows us to estimate the times of origins of eubacteria, cyanobacteria, archaebacteria. The time of or igin of cyanobacteria falls near the previous estimates. To conclude, the GAPDH gene is shown to be a marker for evoluti on. Importantly, the physical quantity X, the second moment of the codon base distribution , normalised to the strand bias, bears the footprint of a remarkably ordered evolution. References [1] R. F. Voss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3805 (1992); W. Li and K. Kaneko, Europhys. Lett. 17, 655 (1992); C. K. Peng, S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, M. Simons, H. E. Stanley and A. L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. E49, 1685 (1994). 12[2] E. Zuckerkandl and L. Pauling, in Evolving Genes and Proteins , edited by V. Bryson and H. Vogel (Academic Press, NY, 1965). [3] O. Kandler, J. Biol. Phys. 20, 165 (1994); M. V. Volkenstein, in Physical Approaches to Biological Evolution , (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994). [4] C. Woese, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 6854 (1998). [5] J. R. Brown and W. F. Doolittle, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev .61, 456 (1997); W. F. Doolittle, Science 284, 2124 (1999). [6] E. W. Montroll and B. J. West, in Fluctuation Phenomena , edited by E. W. Montroll and J. L. Lebowitz (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979). [7] E. W. Montroll and M. F. Shlesinger, in Nonequilibrium Phenomena IIFrom Stochastics to Hydrodynamics , edited by J. L. Lebowitz and E. W. Montroll (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984). [8] Align at the Genestream network server, Institut de G´ en ´ etique Humaine, Montpellier, FRANCE. [9] W. Martin, H. Brinkmann, C. Savonna and R. Cerﬀ, Proc. Nat l. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 8692 (1993). [10] R. Hensel, P. Zwickl, S. Fabry, J. Lang and P. Palm, Can. J . Microbiol. 35:1, 81 (1989). 13[11] P. Arcari, A. D. Russo, G. Ianiciello, M. Gallo and V. Boc chini, Biochem. Genet. 31:5-6 , 241 (1993). [12] M. Thain and M. Hickman, in The Penguin Dictionary of Biology (Penguin Books, London, 1994), p. 594. [13] R. Rom´ an-Rold´ an, P. Bernaola-Galv´ an and J. L. Olive r, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1344 (1998). [14] P. Stein and B. Rowe, in Physical Anthropology (McGraw-Hill, Berkshire, UK, 1995). [15] F. H. Pough, J. B. Heiser and W. N. McFarland, in Vertebrate Life (Prentice-Hall, New Delhi, 1999). Acknowledgments We thank Prof. S. Dey of Biotechnology Centre, IIT, Kharagpu r, and Prof. Anjali Mookerjee of Sivatosh Mookerjee Science Centre, Calcutta, for discussi ons. Anup Som, our companion in the laboratory, has helped us in many ways. 14Figure Legends Figure 1. Average % identity of nucleotide sequence in the GA PDH genes from diﬀerent groups of organisms. The black lines and values imply the alignment results between the proteobacterial gene and the genes from all other groups; the pink lines and va lues for the eubacterial gene with the other genes; the green lines and values between the archaeba cterial gene and the other genes; and the blue lines and values for the cyanobacterial gene with th e rest. Figure 2. The probable periods of origin of the prokaryotes ( see Table 3), along with the peri- ods of origin of the eukaryotes (see Table 2), are plotted aga inst the X values for the corresponding GAPDH genes (see Table 1). The error bars simply indicate the maximum deviation from the aver- age X values for the respective groups. Here the slope of the p rokaryotic GAPDH gene X-evolution is assumed to be equal to that for the eukaryotes. Figure 3. The best linear ﬁt-curves both for the prokaryotes and for the eukaryotes, as we plot the X values vs. the periods of origin. The solid black lines d enotes the best ﬁt-curves. The slopes of the GAPDH gene X-evolution for the prokaryotes and the eukar yotes are found to be close enough to suggest two nearly parallel lines of evolution. 15Table 1: The X values for prokaryotes and eukaryotes, along with the r ange of deviations in respective categories. Category X I. PROKARYOTA proteobacteria 0.9445 ( ±0.0205) archaebacteria 0.9892 ( ±0.0053) eubacteria 0.9896 ( ±0.0089) cyanobacteria 0.9970 ( ±0.0077) 16Category X II. EUKARYOTA fungus 0.9623 ( ±0.0172) invertebrate 0.9677 ( ±0.0238) ﬁsh 0.9818 ( ±0.0068) amphibia 1.0098 bird 1.0102 ( ±0.0015) mammal (excl. human) 1.0234 ( ±0.0028) human 1.0301 17Table 2: Origin of eukaryotes in geological time scale. Category Position in time scale (myr BP) [14,15] Fungus 570 Invertebrate 510 Fish 439 Amphibia 363 Bird 146 Mammal (excl. human) 66.4 Human 1.64 18Table 3: Probable origin of prokaryotes in geological time scale as e merged from their X values. Category Position in time scale (myr BP) Proteobacteria 3500 Archaebacteria 3108 Eubacteria 3105 Cyanobacteria 3040 19This figure "fig1.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/physics/0006055v1-4000-3000-2000-1000 00.940.960.981.001.021.04 mammal (excl. human) amphibia proteobacteriaarchaebacteriaeubacteriacyanobacteria fungusinvertebratefishbirdhuman Figure 2X value geological time scale (million years before present)-3500-3000-2500-2000-1500-1000-50000.940.950.960.970.980.991.001.011.021.031.04 mammal (excl. human) Figure 3proteobacteriaarchaebacteriaeubacteriacyanobacteria fungusinvertebratefishamphibiabirdhumanX value geological time scale (million years before present)
arXiv:physics/0006056v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 22 Jun 2000Clebsch (String) Parameterization of 3-Vectors and Their Actions S. Deser Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02 454, USA R. Jackiw Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technol ogy, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA A.P. Polychronakos Institute of Theoretical Physics, Uppsala University, S-7 5108 Uppsala, Sweden and Physics Department, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioan nina, Greece MIT-CTP # 2992 — Brandeis # BRX TH-476 Abstract We discuss some properties of the intrinsically nonlinear C lebsch decomposition of a vector ﬁeld into three scalars in d= 3. In particular, we note and account for the incom- pleteness of this parameterization when attempting to use i t in variational principles involving Maxwell and Chern-Simons actions. Similarities with string decomposition of metrics and their actions are also pointed out. 1 Clebsch Decomposition The decomposition of vectors, as well as higher rank tensors , into irreducible parts is an ancient and extremely useful tool in ﬂuid mechanics, electr odynamics, and gravity. The longitudinal/transverse split separates an arbitrary d= 3 Euclidean vector into a scalar plus a transverse vector, A≡AL+AT=∇λ+∇×WT, (1) the vector WTbeing deﬁned up to a gradient. This linear orthogonal (upon s patial in- tegration) parameterization naturally decomposes the 3-v ectorAinto two, with 1 and 2 components, respectively. The completeness of ( ∇λ,WT) in representing Ais evidenced by their uniqueness and invertibility (up to zero modes); in pa rticular, any variational principle yields the same Euler-Lagrange system whether we vary Aor ﬁrst decompose it and then vary ( λ,WT) separately. It is easy to check that since the ﬁeld strength is B≡∇×A=−∇2WT, (2) the Chern-Simons (ﬁrst used physically in [1]) and Maxwell a ctions ICS=1 2µ/integraldisplay A·B=−1 2µ/integraldisplay (∇×WT)·(∇2WT)IM=−1 2/integraldisplay B2=−1 2/integraldisplay (∇2WT)2,(3) vary with Ainto δICS/δA=µB, δI M/δA=∇×B (4) 1which agrees completely with the variations of (3) with resp ect to ( λ,WT). The extra curl that appears upon varying WTdoes not lose information: the curl is not a projector in the space of transverse functions. Another ancient parameterization, due to Clebsch [2], has l ong been used in ﬂuid me- chanics [3], but is less familiar elsewhere. This decomposi tion is strikingly diﬀerent – it involves only scalars rather than vectors and is nonlinear: A=∇ω+ǫabφa∇φb=∇ω′+ 2φ1∇φ2,B=∇×A=ǫab∇φa×∇φb. (5) The representations (1) and (5) share the pure gauge longitu dinal term, but the role of WT has been assumed by the pair of scalars φa,a=1,2; ǫab=−ǫbais the alternating symbol. The construction of these scalars is described in the texts [ 4]; for the moment we note only that the φaare not uniquely determined by AorB, nor can all ( A,B) be put in this form in terms of well-deﬁned scalar functions. Our main interest is the particularly strange phenomenon (n ot hitherto noted to our knowledge), that the Clebsch decomposition (5) is incomple te in the very concrete sense that it fails (diﬀerently for each), when inserted into the t wo actions of (3) and varied with respect to ( ω, φ a), to give the ﬁeld equations (4) implied by the generic A-variations. The formal source of this incompleteness may be traced by compar ing the decompositions (1) and (5), ∇2λ=∇·A=∇2ω+ǫabφa∇2φb,−∇2WT=∇×A=ǫab∇φa×∇φb.(6) Note the demand of (6) that the curl of Abe expressible as the cross-product of two gradients: the curl must then lie on the line orthogonal to the plane they deﬁne. It follows that the Chern-Simons action becomes a pure surface term, /integraldisplay A·∇×A=/integraldisplay ∇ω·∇×A=/integraldisplay ∇·(ω∇×A). (7) Inω= 0 gauge, Ais locally orthogonal to B, and in any gauge the bulk integral of (7) vanishes1.A fortiori , the variation of ICSwith respect to ( ω, φ a) is trivial. Pure Chern- Simons dynamics here reduces entirely to the boundary2, rather than deﬁning the (trivially B=0) behavior in the bulk. Variation of the Maxwell action is also incomplete: −δ1 2/integraltextB2≡ −/integraltextB·ǫcd(∇φc×∇δφd), (8) resulting in the pair of Euler-Lagrange equations (∇×B)·∇φa≡∇·(φa∇×B) = 0, a = 1,2. (9) 1When the volume integral of A·∇×Ais nonzero, its entire contribution in the Clebsch paramete rization forAmust come from surface terms. Consequently, the Clebsch pot entials ω, φamust be ill behaved, either in the ﬁnite volume or at inﬁnity, so that the surface integra ls do not vanish. For an example and further details, see [5] 2In this respect, when CS is used as the “helicity” in magnetoh ydrodynamics, it bears a resemblance to gravitational energy; there is no sensible local (gauge inv ariant) density, but a perfectly well deﬁned integral over the boundary. 2That is, ∇×B, likeBitself, is orthogonal to the plane deﬁned by ( ∇φa): the ﬁeld equation is then ∇×B+µ(r)B= 0. (10) The function of integration, µ(r), is constrained by the transversality of ( B,∇×B) in (10) to have its gradient orthogonal to them both: ∇µmust lie in the ( ∇φa) plane. The indeterminacies in the two variational principles are r ather diﬀerent: from ICS, there is no ﬁeld equation at all; this is in fact traceable to t he Darboux incompleteness of the Clebsch decomposition [6], which rests on the trivialit y of the bulk contribution to ICS that it imposes1. From the Maxwell action, we obtain only the direction of ∇×B. Indeed, any gauge invariant action I[B] will provide the same form [∇×δI/δB(x)]·∇φa= 0, (11) and hence allow the same indeterminate µ(r)Baddition, subject to ∇µ·B= 0. The topologically massive-like [7] “Maxwell” equation (10 ) is quite unusual: Consider (9) in “covariant” notation, (∂νFµν)∂µφa≡∂µ(∂νFµνφa) = 0 (12) whose solution is ∂νFµνφa=ǫναβ∂αZa β (13) where Za αare two arbitrary transverse 3-vectors. This means in turn t hat there are two (conserved) “currents”, for example, jµ= (φbφb)−1φaǫµαβ∂αZa β.Equations (9,10) and (12,13) present the ﬁeld equations in two equivalent ways. If we inst ead introduce the explicit form (6) into (9), we get two (cubic) equations in φalone, ∂ν[ǫbcφb(∂2 µν−δµν∇2)φc]∂µφa= 0. (14) A nonabelian generalization of the Clebsch decomposition h as recently been suggested [9]. It shares the abelian property that the CS term is a pure d ivergence and a similar degeneracy in the ﬁeld equations occurs. The basic mechanis m in both cases is that the variation of an action with respect to the initial variable, hereAµor its color generalization, is to be multiplied by δAµ/δω, δA µ/δφa. The degenerate contributions noted above again occur as a result of the φavariations. It is amusing to compare the Clebsch vector decomposition to the “string-embedding” partition of a 2-tensor [8], available in any dimension d, gµν(x) =yA µ(x)yB ν(x)ηAB, yA µ≡∂µyA. (15) The scalar string variables yA, with the index Aranging over 1 , . . .,1 2d(d+ 1), are now the independent ones. Inserting this decomposition into the Ei nstein action (or indeed any other covariant one) and varying the yA, δI=/integraldisplay Gµνδgµν/δyAδyA≡ −/integraldisplay DµDν(GµνyA)δyA(16a) 3(where Gµν≡δI/δg µνis the necessarily identically conserved “Einstein” tenso r density of the action I[g]) gives Euler-Lagrange equations very similar to the “weak Maxwell” ones, in terms of the covariant derivative Dµ(g) Gµν(g(y))DµDνyA= 0. (16b) These are much weaker [8] than3Gµν= 0. In both vector and tensor cases, the problem is with the derivative nature of a parameterization by scalars : the equally nonlinear vielbein decomposition of the metric gµν=ea µeb νηabinto the set of vectors ( eµ)ais of course perfectly acceptable (if the vielbeins are invertible). Also true of both the Clebsch and the tensor decompositions is the inaccessibility of weak ﬁeld, linear ized, theory from these nonlinear parameterizations, unlike the (invertible) vielbein choice, where there is a vacuum possibility ea µ=δa µabout which to expand. This work was supported in part by National Science Foundati on grant PHY99-73935 and US Department of Energy (DOE) contract # DE-FC02-94ER40 818. References [1] L. Woltier, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 44(1958) 489. [2] A. Clebsch, J. Reine Angew. Math. 56(1859) 1. [3] See for example, M. Berger and G. Field, J. Fluid Mech. 147(1984) 133; H. Moﬀat and A. Tsinober, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24(1992) 281; V. Arnold and B. Khesin, Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics (Springer, Berlin, 1998). [4] H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1932) p. 248. [5] R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. D 61(2000) 105015; hep-th/9911072. [6] See for example, S. Sternberg, Lectures on Diﬀerential Geometry (Prentice Hall, Engle- wood Cliﬀs, NJ,1964). [7] S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, Ann. Phys. 140(1982) 372. [8] T. Regge and C. Teitelboim in Proceedings Marcel Grossmann Meeting , R. Ruﬃni, ed. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977) p. 75 ; S. Deser, D.C. Robin son and F.A.E. Pirani, Phys. Rev. D 14(1976) 3302. [9] R. Jackiw, V.P. Nair and S.-Y. Pi, preprint hep-th/00040 84. 3One might conjecture that a quantity similar to the Chern-Si mons form becomes degenerate in the metric case, for example, that yielding the Cotton tensor (see [7]) ind= 3. The absence of CS generalizations in evendmay account for the lack of a higher dClebsch representation for vectors. For odd d, the extension of (5), A=∇ω+/summationtextd−2 i=1φi∇φi+1, trivializes the corresponding CS ∼A·F1···Fd−2. 4
arXiv:physics/0006057v1 [physics.gen-ph] 22 Jun 2000“Back-of-the-envelope” wind and altitude correction for 100 metre sprint times J. R. Mureika∗ Department of Physics University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario Canada M5S 1A7 PACS No. : Primary 01.80; Secondary: 02.60L February 2, 2008 Abstract A simple algebraic expression is presented to correct men’s and women’s 100 metre sprint times for ambient wind and altitude eﬀects. The simpliﬁed fo rmula is derived from a more complicated equation of motion used to model the athlet e’s velocity as a function of time (the velocity curve). This method predicts adjustme nts to 0-wind and 0-altitude equivalents, which are in excellent agreement to other esti mates presented in the literature. The expression is easily programmable on any computer, and c ould conveniently be used by coaches, meet directors, or the media to assess the perfor mance of athletes and the quality of a race immediately following the event. ∗newt@palmtree.physics.utoronto.ca 11 Introduction Although not oﬃcially recognized by the International Amat eur Athletic Federation (IAAF), correcting sprint race times for the eﬀe cts of wind and altitude variation is a subject of increasing interest in th e Track and Field community. With the number of men’s sub-9.90 s and women’s su b-10.80 s clockings on the rise, correcting these marks to their sea-l evel, 0-wind equiv- alents is useful in determining the overall quality of the pe rformances (at the time of competition). A literature search reveals rather de tailed experimen- tal ﬁeld studies of these eﬀects [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], as well as seve ral theoretical estimates based on mathematical and computational simulat ions [6, 7, 8]. Physically, linear drag forces (scaled to units of mass) are expressed as Fd=1 2CdAρ(H)(v(t)−w)2, (1) where Cdis the drag coeﬃcient, Athe frontal cross-sectional area, ρ(H) the atmospheric density at altitude H,v(t) the sprinter’s velocity, and wthe wind speed (co-linear to v(t)). It follows that Fdwill be smaller for tail-winds (w >0), and larger for head-winds ( w <0) at a ﬁxed altitude. Head-winds and tail-winds of equal magnitude will not provide equal-ma gnitude time corrections, due to the non-linear nature of the drag term. At 0 metres altitude with 0 wind, the base drag is F0= 1/2CdAρ0v(t)2, where ρ0= 1.184 g cm−3is the mean sea-level density of air at 25 degrees Celsius. Since air density varies exponentially as a functi on of altitude, a convenient approximation can be written as ρ(H) =ρ0exp(−0.000125 ·H) [1] for the range of elevations considered herein (less than 2300 m for the majority of competition venues). The general consensus of most researchers in question is tha t for a 10.00 s race (average men’s world-class sprint), a tail-wind of +2 m s−1will provide an advantage of roughly 0.10 seconds ( i.e.a faster time), whose value will vary slightly depending on the altitude of the competition v enue. If the wind gauge reads in excess of +2 ms−1, the performance is termed wind- assisted, and is not eligible for any potential record statu s. Conversely with no wind, an altitude of 1000 m will produce an advantage o f 0.03 s, above which performances are oﬃcially deemed altitude-ass isted. Unlike wind-assisted marks, an altitude-assisted time can still c ount for a record. At 2000 m, the advantage will be about 0.06 s over a sea-level r un. An 11.00 s time (average world-class women) will be boosted by a bout +0.12 s with a +2 ms−1tail-wind, and by 0.07 s (no wind) at 2000 m. As altitude increases, the magnitude of the wind eﬀects will increase. O bviously, this is 2a reasonable explanation for the rash of World Records (WRs) experienced in the sprints and long jump at the 1968 Olympics in Mexico Cit y, which resides at an altitude of approximately 2250 m. 2 “Back-of-the-Envelope” correction: Derivation A ”back-of-the-envelope” (BOTE) calculation is a simpliﬁe d reduction of a complex (physical) model, from which one can make reasonabl e predictions with a minimal number of input parameters. An exact modeling of wind and altitude eﬀects is a daunting task, since the mechanics i nvolved are numerous and not easily representable by basic functions (s ee [7] for such a model). A historically-based method of such simulations is via the velocity curve approach. This is a method of studying a sprinter’s per formance, ﬁrst introduced empirically by Hill [9] in the early 1900s, and fu rther investigated by Keller [10] as an equation of motion of the form ˙v(t) =Fp−v(t)α−1, (2) The term Fpis a propulsive term, while αis a decay term (representing internal physiological or biomechanical variables). Note that again Equa- tions (2) is scaled in units of the sprinter’s mass M, so the interpretation ofFdis force per unit mass (or, eﬀectively, acceleration). Unle ss otherwise speciﬁed, this notation is used for the remainder of the arti cle. This derivation roughly follows that of Reference [8], howe ver the latter incorrectly estimates the numerical value of certain key va riables, and omits the eﬀects of altitude all together. In fact, the author of [8 ] suggests that altitude eﬀects on sprint times cannot be modeled by drag modiﬁcation alone, which is not necessarily a correct assertion (as will be shown). Equation (2) may easily be altered to include drag eﬀects by t he addition ofFd, ˙v(t) =Fp−v(t)α−1−Fd, (3) and a time dependence Fp→Fp(t) may also be added (see e.g.[7, 11, 12] for such mechanisms). The BOTE expression presented herein, be ing simplis- tic by its namesake, does not include these substitutions, a nd furthermore imposes an additional simpliﬁcation of time-independence ,v(t)→v, and ˙v(t) = 0. To address the issue of wind and altitude correction, deﬁne a s follows v(w,H) (velocity of the sprinter at altitude Hwith wind w);v(0,0) (velocity with 0-wind, at sea-level); and Fd(w,H) (eﬀective drag for wind wand 3altitude H). Subject to the constraint of constant velocity, Equation (3) may be rewritten as v(w,H) = α[Fp−Fd(w,H)], v(0,0) = α[Fp−Fd(0,0)], (4) for each case described above. Solving for αand equating the two expressions above yields v(0,0) v(w,H)=(1−Fd(0,0)/Fp) (1−Fd(w,H)/Fp), (5) Deﬁne the ratio δ=Fd(0,0)/Fpas the eﬀort required to overcome drag in 0-wind conditions at sea level. The numerical value of δwill be discussed shortly. Since velocity is constant ( i.e.the average race velocity), one can write v(w,H) = 100 /tw,H, where tw,His the oﬃcial time for the race under con- sideration, and rewrite Equation (5) as t0,0 tw,H=(1−Fd(w,H)/Fp) (1−δ), (6) To simplify this expression further, note that the drag forc e for arbitrary wandHcan be written as Fd(w,H) =1 2CdAρ(H)v(w,H)2/parenleftbigg 1−w v(w,H)/parenrightbigg2 =Fd(0,0)/parenleftBigg v(w,H) v0,0/parenrightBigg2 exp(−0.000125 ·H)/parenleftbigg 1−w·tw,H 100/parenrightbigg2 (7) So, replacing ( v(w,H)/v0) = (t0,0/tw,H), Fd(w,H) Fp=δ/parenleftBigg t0,0 tw,H/parenrightBigg2 exp(−0.000125 ·H)/parenleftbigg 1−w·tw,H 100/parenrightbigg2 ,(8) and thus t0,0 tw,H=1 (1−δ) 1−δ/parenleftBigg t0,0 tw,H/parenrightBigg2 exp(−0.000125 ·H)/parenleftbigg 1−w·tw,H 100)/parenrightbigg2 . (9) 4Unfortunately, this is now a quadratic expression in ( t0,0/tw,H), but this problem is quickly resolved by making the following substit ution. Rewrite (t0,0/tw,H) = 1 + ∆ t/tw,H, with ∆ t=t0,0−tw,H. Since ∆ twill seldom be larger than 0.3 s for a ∼10 s race, it is reasonable to make the substitution /parenleftBigg t0,0 tw,H/parenrightBigg2 =/parenleftBigg 1 +∆t tw,H/parenrightBigg2 ≃1 + 2∆t tw,H= 2t0,0 tw,H−1 (10) The numerical value of δis determined as δ=Fd(0,0) Fp=1 2CdAρ0v2 M F p(11) (recall that the earlier deﬁnition of Fis scaled in units of inverse mass, hence the need for Min the denominator). Pritchard [8] initially found a value of δ≃0.032 (i.e. 3 .2% of a sprinter’s eﬀort is required to overcome drag), however this assumed an overestimated value of the dr ag coeﬃcient Cd= 1.0, as well as the mean propulsive force Fp= 12.1 ms−2. Current research suggests a drag coeﬃcient of Cd∈(0.5,0.6) [7, 13], as well as an average Fp∼7 ms−2[7, 11, 12]. For a 9 .90−10.00 s race, the average velocity is between v= 10− 10.1 m s−1. Taking the drag area to be Cd·A= 0.23 m2(consistent with the quoted Cdvalues, and cross-sectional area A∈(0.4,0.5) m2, for a sprinter of mass 75 kg, one ﬁnds δ∼0.027. Since δis small, 1 /(1−δ)≃(1 +δ), and including the approximation of Equation (10), Equation (9) may be rearranged as t0,0 tw,H=/parenleftbigg1 1−δ/parenrightbigg/bracketleftBigg 1−δexp(−0.000125 ·H)/parenleftBigg 2t0,0 tw,H−1/parenrightBigg/parenleftbigg 1−w·tw,H 100/parenrightbigg2/bracketrightBigg ≃1 +δ−δexp(−0.000125 ·H)/parenleftbigg 1−w·tw,H 100/parenrightbigg2 +o(δ2), (12) Thus, inserting the numerical value of δ, one obtains the “back-of-the- envelope” calculation t0,0≃tw,H[1.027−0.027exp( −0.000125 ·H)(1−w·tw,H/100)2].(13) For women, the input parameters Fp,A,v2, andMare smaller, so assuming values v= (100 /11) = 9 .1 ms−1,M= 65 kg, Fp∼5 ms−2, andA∼0.35 m2, δremains essentially unchanged. Equation (13) provides an excellent match to the prediction s of Refer- ence [7], as well as those of Dapena [2] and Linthorne [5]. Thu s, 100 metre 5sprint times may be corrected to their 0-wind, sea level equi valents by in- putting only the oﬃcial time, the wind gauge reading, and the altitude of the sporting venue. Furthermore, Equation (8) is easily pro grammable in most scientiﬁc calculators and personal computers, and hen ce may be used track-side by coaches, oﬃcials and the media immediately fo llowing a race to gauge its overall “quality”. 3 Applications To demonstrate the utility of Equation (13), Tables 1, 2, 3, a nd 4 present the corresponding corrections to the top ﬁve all-time men’s and women’s 100 m performances run with legal tail-winds, illegal winds ( w > +2.0 ms−1), altitude eﬀects ( H >1000 m), and extreme head-winds ( w <−1 ms−1). The current 100 m World Record (as of June 2000) of 9.79 s by Mau rice Greene was run at low altitude with virtually no wind, and adj usts to 9.80 s. Note that (Table 1) the 9.86 s performances of Trinidadian At o Boldon and Namibia’s Frank Fredericks were both run into head-winds of equal magni- tude, but the altitude diﬀerence allows for a 0.02 s diﬀerent ial in corrected times. The former World Record of 9.84 s by Canada’s Donovan B ailey cor- rects to a 9.88 s. It is also interesting to note how exception al performances can be hampered by strong head-winds (Table 4). The 10.49 s WR of the late Florence Griﬃth-Joyner is included in both Table 1 and Table 2, to demonstrate the common belief that thi s mark was strongly wind-aided (despite the fact that the oﬃcial wind g auge reading was +0.0 ms−1, there is strong circumstantial evidence to suggest that th e equipment malfunctioned). Griﬃth-Joyner’s legal persona l records (PRs) correct to about 10.68 s, while her +2.1 ms−1wind-aided 10.54 s (Seoul, 1988) corrects to 10.66 s. Thus, the actual WR mark should pro bably be 10.60-10.65 s (or a 0-wind, 0-altitude equivalent of about 1 0.66-10.68 s). American Marion Jones’ current adjusted PR is 10.69 s, eﬀect ively on par with Griﬃth-Joyner’s best marks. From a historical perspective, it is interesting to note tha t Calvin Smith’s 10.04 s ( −2.2 ms−1) in 1983 would have converted to a 0-wind 9.93 s at sea level. Smith’s actual WR of 9.93 s (+1.2 ms−1) was run at altitude (Col- orado Springs, USA; 1850 m), correcting to only 10.03 s. The f ormer WRs of Canada’s Ben Johnson, 9.79 s (+1.1 ms−1) in Seoul, SKR, and 9.83 s (+1.0 ms−1) in Rome, ITA, would correct to 9.85 s and 9.88 s, respec- tively. Unfortunately, these marks were stricken as a resul t of performance- enhancing drug infractions. 64 Conclusions The presented “back-of-the-envelope” calculation is simp le to use, and is applicable to both men and women’s performances. An on-line JavaScript version is available at the author’s website, currently http://palmtree.physics.utoronto.ca/ ∼newt/track/wind/ It is hoped that its use may be eventually adopted by the IAAF a nd/or other governing bodies of Athletics as a relative gauge of pe rformance quality under diﬀering competition conditions. Acknowledgements I thank Jesus Dapena for helpful discussions, and for provid ing the data of Reference [2] prior to its publication. This work was suppor ted in part by a Walter C. Sumner Memorial Fellowship, as well as a grant from the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council. References [1] J. Dapena and M. Feltner, Int. J. Sport Biomech. 3, 6-39 (1987) [2] J. Dapena, The Big Green Book , Track and Field News Press (in press, 2000) [3] C. T. M. Davies, J. Appl. Physio. 48, 702-709 (1980) [4] N. P. Linthorne, Proc. 8th Bienn. Conf. Can. Soc. Biomech . (1994) [5] N. P. Linthorne, J. App. Biomech. 10, 110-131 (1994) [6] J. R. Mureika, Athletics: Canada’s National Track and Fi eld / Running Magazine (Jul 1997; Sep 1997; Oct 1997; Nov/Dec 1997) [7] J. R. Mureika, in preparation [8] W. G. Pritchard, SIAM Review 35, 359 (1993); W. G. Pritchard and J. K. Pritchard, Amer. Sci. 82(1994) [9] A. V. Hill, inReport of the 93rd Meeting, Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 156 (1925) [10] J. B. Keller, Physics Today 43, Sept. 1973; J. B. Keller, Amer. Math. Monthly 81, 474 (1974) 7[11] J. R. Mureika, Can. J. Phys. 75, 837-851 (1997) [12] R. Tibshirani, Amer. Stat. (May 1997) [13] N. P. Linthorne, personal communication 8Athlete tw,H(w) Venue (Altitude) Date t0,0 Maurice Greene USA 9.79 (+0.1) Athens, GRE (110) 99/06/16 9. 80 Bruny Surin CAN 9.84 (+0.2) Athens, GRE 99/08/22 9.85 Donovan Bailey CAN 9.84 (+0.7) Atlanta, USA (315) 96/07/27 9 .88 Leroy Burrell USA 9.85 (+1.2) Lausanne, SWI (600) 94/07/06 9 .92 Ato Boldon TRI 9.86 ( −0.4) Athens, GRE 98/06/17 9.84 Frank Fredericks NAM 9.86 ( −0.4) Lausanne, SWI 96/07/03 9.86 Florence Griﬃth-Joyner USA 10.49 (+0.0) Indianapolis, USA (220) 88/07/16 10.50 10.61(+1.2) Indianapolis, USA 88/07/17 10.68 Marion Jones USA 10.72 (+0.0) Monaco (10) 98/08/08 10.72 Christine Aaron FRA 10.73 (+2.0) Budapest, HUN (150) 98/08/ 19 10.84 Merlene Ottey JAM 10.74 (+1.3) Milano, ITA (121) 96/09/07 10 .82 Evelyn Ashford USA 10.76 (+1.7) Zurich, SWI (410) 84/08/22 1 0.87 Table 1: Men’s and Women’s top 5 all-time legal 100 m performa nces (best per athlete). Times measured in seconds (s), and wind-speed s in ms−1. Altitude is assumed to be correct to within ±20 m. 9Athlete tw,H(w) Venue (Altitude) Date t0,0 Obadele Thompson BAR 9.69 (+5.7) El Paso, USA (1300) 96/04/1 3 9.91 Carl Lewis USA 9.78 (+5.2) Indianapolis, USA 88/07/16 9.98 Andre Cason USA 9.79 (+4.5) Eugene, USA 93/06/16 9.97 Maurice Greene USA 9.79 (+2.9) Eugene, USA 98/05/31 9.92 Leonard Scott USA 9.83 (+7.1) Knoxville, USA (270) 99/04/09 10.07 Griﬃth-Joyner USA 10.49 (+5.5) Indianapolis, USA 88/07/16 10.72 10.54(+3.0) Seoul, SKR (85) 88/09/25 10.69 Marion Jones USA 10.75 (+4.1) New Orleans, USA (10) 98/06/19 10.95 Gail Devers USA 10.77 (+2.3) San Jose, USA (10) 94/05/28 10.9 0 Ekaterini Thanou GRE 10.77 (+2.3) Rethymno, GRE (20) 99/05/ 29 10.90 Evelyn Ashford USA 10.78 (+3.1) Modesto, USA (25) 84/05/12 1 0.94 Table 2: Top 5 all-time wind-assisted marks ( w >+2.0 ms−1). Athlete tw,H(w) Venue (Altitude) Date t0,0 Obadele Thompson BAR 9.87 ( −0.2) Johannesburg, RSA (1750) 98/09/11 9.91 Seun Ogunkoya NGR 9.92 ( −0.2) Johannesburg, RSA 98-09-11 9.96 Calvin Smith USA 9.93 (+1.4) Colorado Springs, USA (1853) 83 /07/03 10.04 Jim Hines USA 9.95 (+0.3) Mexico City, MEX (2250) 68/10/14 10 .03 Olapade Adeniken NGR 9.95 (+1.9) El Paso, USA (1300) 94-04-1 6 10.07 Marion Jones USA 10.65 (+1.1) Johannesburg, RSA 98/09/12 10 .76 Dawn Sowell USA 10.78 (+1.0) Provo, USA (1380) 89/06/03 10.8 1 Evelyn Ashford USA 10.79 (+0.6) Colorado Springs, USA 83/07 /03 10.88 Diane Williams USA 10.94 (+0.6) Colorado Springs, USA 83/07 /03 11.03 Chandra Sturrup BAH 10.97 (+1.1) Johannesburg, RSA 98/09/1 2 11.08 Table 3: Top 5 all-time altitude-assisted marks ( H >1000 m). 10Athlete tw,H(w) Venue (Altitude) Date t0,0 Maurice Greene USA 9.96 ( −1.0) Uniondale, USA (30) 98/07/21 9.92 Leroy Burrell USA 9.97 ( −1.3) Barcelona, ESP (95) 92/08/01 9.90 Linford Christie USA 10.00 ( −1.3) Barcelona, ESP 92/08/01 9.93 Ato Boldon TRI 10.00 ( −1.0) Uniondale, USA 98/07/21 9.96 Donovan Bailey CAN 10.03 ( −2.1) Abbotsford, CAN (40) 97/07/19 9.91 Irena Privalova USR 10.84 ( −1.0) Barcelona, ESP 92/08/11 10.77 Gwen Torrence USA 10.86 ( −1.0) Barcelona, ESP 92/08/01 10.79 Merlene Ottey JAM 10.88 ( −1.0) Barcelona, ESP 92/08/01 10.81 Evelyn Ashford USA 10.96 ( −1.4) Knoxville, USA 82/06/19 10.88 Jones USA 10.97 ( −1.1) Indianapolis, USA 97/06/13 10.90 Table 4: Top 5 all-time marks with w≤ −1.0 ms−1. 11
arXiv:physics/0006058v1 [physics.atom-ph] 23 Jun 2000Experimental evidence of dynamical localization and deloc alization in a quasi-periodic driven system J. Ringot, P. Szriftgiser, and J. C. Garreau Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes et Mol´ ecules an d Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Laser et Applications, Universit´ e des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, F-59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France D. Delande Laboratoire Kastler-Brossel, Tour 12, Etage 1, Universit´ e Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris This paper presents the ﬁrst experimental evidence of the tr ansition from dynamical localization to delocalization under the inﬂuence of a quasi-periodic dr iving on a quantum system. A quantum kicked rotator is realized by placing cold atoms in a pulsed, far-detuned, standing wave. If the standing wave is periodically pulsed, one observes the supp ression of the classical chaotic diﬀusion, i.e. dynamical localization. If the standing wave is pulsed quasi-periodically with two diﬀerent frequencies, dynamical localization is observed or not, de pending on the two frequencies being commensurable or incommensurable. One can thus study the tr ansition from the localized to the delocalized case as a function of the eﬀective dimensionali ty of the system. Dynamical localization (DL) is a speciﬁcally quantum phenomenon taking place in time-periodic systems whose corresponding classical dynamics displays chaotic diﬀu- sion. While, in the classical limit, because of the diﬀu- sion process, the system spreads indeﬁnitely in the phase space, the quantum system follows the classical diﬀusive dynamics for short time only, but after some localization timefreezes its evolution with no further increase of the average energy. This behavior, attributed to quantum interferences among the diﬀusive paths which for long times are in the average completely destructive, was numerically observed at the end of the 70’s on the one-dimensional kicked ro- tator exposed to periodic kicks [1], a paradigmatic simple system whose classical dynamics can be reduced to iter- ations of the Chirikov’s standard map. The possibility of observing DL with a system con- stituted of cold atoms placed in a far-detuned standing wave has been theoretically suggested in 1992 [2] and ex- perimentally observed in 1994 [3]. A crucial question is whether DL is robust versus perturbations of the system. Indeed, as it strongly relies on quantum interferences, it is expected to be rather fragile. As a matter of fact, it has been experimentally shown that DL can be partly or totally destroyed by decoherence (i.e. coupling of the system to external degrees of freedom; in the present con- text spontaneous emission plays such a role) and noise, that is deviation from strict periodicity [4,5]. Moreover, there is a relevant connection of DL with the Anderson localization taking place in disordered systems. Indeed, the periodically kicked rotator problem can be mapped on a one-dimensional Anderson model, that is a model of a particle moving along a one-dimensional chain of sites [6], with coupling between neighbors and diago- nal disorder, i.e. pseudo-random values of the potential energies on each site. In 1-d, although the classical mo-tion is diﬀusive, the quantum eigenstates are all localized . Because of the similarity of the Anderson and kicked top models, Anderson localization and DL are similar quan- tum phenomena, the ﬁrst one taking place along space coordinates, the second one along the time coordinate with localization in the momentum domain. It is well known that Anderson localization is strongly dependent on the number of spatial degrees of freedom. Similarly, DL is expected to be highly sensitive on the number of temporal degrees of freedom, that is on the frequency spectrum of the external driving. We here consider the interesting simple case where the external driving is not periodic but quasi-periodic, with two independent frequencies. Theoretical arguments and numerical simulations [7] suggest that the situation is similar to the 2-d Anderson model, and that the local- ization time should become so large that it might be im- possible to observe DL experimentally. The goal of this paper is to study experimentally such a situation of in- creased dimensionality and to test the theoretical predic- tions. We realized a quantum kicked rotator with a primary series of kicks of frequency f1to which a secondary series of kicks (frequency f2) can be added, with f2/f1=r. A physical experiment cannot be sensitive to the rational or irrational character of a number; one might thus con- sider only rational values of this frequency ratio. For a given rational value of r=p/q(irreducible fraction), the periodicity of the system cannot have any physical eﬀect before at least qkicks of the primary series. Thus, peri- odicity eﬀects like DL cannot show up unless the number of primary kicks is large compared to q. As the number of primary kicks increases, one expects to ﬁnd more and more “rational” values of p/qfor which DL is eﬀectively observed. Working with a two-frequency quantum ro- tator thus allows one to go from the 1-d to the 2-d case 1by choosing irreducible frequency ratios corresponding to larger and larger q[7]. Experimental results on the two- frequency microwave ionization of Rydberg atoms have indirectly shown the importance of rational or irrational values in quantum transport properties [8]. The atomic quantum kicked rotator is realized by plac- ing cold atoms (cesium in our case) of mass Min a far- detuned, pulsed standing wave of intensity I0, wave num- berkLand detuning ∆ with respect to the closest atomic transition (the cesium D2 line at 852 nm). If the detun- ing is large enough, the dominant interaction between atoms and the laser light is the light-potential which is proportional to the intensity. One then obtains a Hamil- tonian of the form H=p2 2M−V0cos(2kLx)f(t) (1) where f(t) is a function of period T, and V0= ¯hΩ2/8∆, where Ω is the resonant Rabi frequency. V0is propor- tional to the light intensity. In the limit where the width of the peaks in f(t) is neg- ligible compared to T(i.e., each peak approaches a delta function), rescaling variables [2] allows one to reduce thi s Hamiltonian to the standard form corresponding to the quantum rotator: H1=P2 2−Kcosθ/summationdisplay nδ(τ−n) (2) where Kis the so-called stochasticity parameter and where the new conjugate variables obey the quantum commutation rule [ θ, P] =i¯heﬀwith ¯heﬀ= 4¯hkLT/Mthe eﬀective Planck constant . The classical limit (¯ heﬀ→0) of such a system becomes (weakly) chaotic for K≈1 and fully chaotic for K≈10. When a second series of pulses is applied, the reduced Hamiltonian becomes: H2=P2 2−cosθ{K1/summationdisplay nδ(τ−n) + K2/summationdisplay nδ[τ−(n+φ/2π)/r]} (3) withK1=K2in our experiment. In the above equation φis the phase of the second series of pulses with respect to the ﬁrst series. The classical dynamics of this system is essentially identical to the periodic kicked rotator: fo r K1=K2≈10,it is a chaotic diﬀusion. Our realization of the kicked rotator (Fig. 1) is simi- lar to that of ref. [5]. Cold cesium atoms issued from a magneto-optical trap (MOT) are placed in a far-detuned, pulsed standing wave. The measurement of momentum distribution is accomplished in our setup by velocity- selective Raman stimulated transitions between the Fg= 3 and Fg= 4 hyperﬁne ground-state sublevels [9]. Gen- eration of the Raman beams is based on direct current modulation at 4.6 GHz of a diode laser, detuned by 200GHz with respect to the atomic transition. The two sym- metric ﬁrst-order optical sidebands are then used to in- ject two diode lasers that produce 150 mW beams with a 9.2 GHz beat-note of sub-hertz spectral width [10]. Cesium atoms are ﬁrst optically pumped into the Fg= 3 hyperﬁne sublevel. A Raman pulse of detuning δRbrings the atoms in the velocity class v=δR/(2kR) (kRis the wave number of the Raman beams) back to theFg= 4 hyperﬁne sublevel. A probe beam resonant with the transition from the sublevel Fg= 4 is frequency modulated, and its absorption signal detected by a lock- in ampliﬁer, yielding a signal proportional to the popu- lation of the Fg= 4 level. Stray magnetic ﬁelds are harmful for the Raman ve- locity measurement. 3D-magneto-resistive probes are placed at the eight corners of the MOT cell. Their sig- nal is electronically interpolated and generates a feed- back signal to three mutually orthogonal Helmholtz coil pairs [11]. We measured a residual magnetic ﬁeld below 250µG and an eﬀective compensation band-width of 500 Hz. The ¯ hkL/2 momentum resolution then obtained is largely suﬃcient for this experiment, and is much better than that obtained by time of ﬂight methods [5]. A power diode laser is detuned by 7 GHz with respect to the cesium D2 line at 852 nm. An acousto-optical modulator is used to generate arbitrary series of pulses. The modulated beam is then transported by an optical ﬁber to the neighborhood of the MOT apparatus. The standing wave, obtained by back-reﬂection of this beam, has a waist of 0.6 mm and a typical power of 50 mW in each direction. It is modulated with two series of pulses: the primary pulses of ﬁxed frequency f1= 36 kHz are 500 ns long, corresponding to a stochasticity parameter K1= 10 and to an eﬀective Planck constant ¯ heﬀ= 2.9. The pulse shape is rectangular with a rise and fall time of the order of 50 ns. The secondary pulses have the same duration and the same intensity, but their frequency f2 and phase φcan be adjusted at will. A typical experiment is done with 50 primary pulses. In order to avoid pulse superposition eﬀects between the two series, the phase φ is ﬁxed to an arbitrary non-zero value. In an experimental run, cesium atoms are ﬁrst cooled and trapped by the MOT. A Sisyphus-molasses phase further reduces the temperature to about 3.3 µK. The MOT beams are turned oﬀ and a pulse of a repumper beam transfers the atoms from the Fg= 4 to the Fg= 3 hyperﬁne sublevel. The standing wave is then turned on. When the standing wave excitation ends, the Raman se- quence described above is used to detect the population of a velocity class. The whole sequence then starts over with a diﬀerent value of the Raman detuning to probe a new velocity class. The pulse sequence is produced by two synthesizers at frequencies f1andf2with a ﬁxed phase relation. We show in Fig. 2 the initial momen- tum distribution (just before the kicks are applied) and the ﬁnal distributions (after interaction with the stand- 2ing wave) for f2/f1= 1.000 and f2/f1= 1.083 and a phase of φ= 180◦. The initial distribution is a gaussian with a typical full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 10¯hkL. Both ﬁnal distributions show a clear broaden- ing with respect to the initial one. For the “resonant” case ( f2/f1= 1) [trace (b)], the distribution presents a characteristic exponential shape P(p)≃exp(−\|p\|/L), with a localization length (along the momentum axis) L≈8.5¯hkL, which is a signature of the dynamical local- ization. This is not surprising as for f1=f2,the system is strictly time-periodic and thus should present dynami- cal localization. The measured localization length agrees fairly well with theoretical estimates. Trace (c) corre- sponds to a non-resonant truly quasi-periodic case, where the ratio f2/f1= 1.083 is suﬃciently far from any simple rational number. The momentum distribution presents a broader and more complex shape. We have performed numerical simulations of the system, as described by Eq. (3): we have solved “exactly” the Schr¨ odinger equa- tion using a method similar to the one described in [12]. The resulting momentum distribution is averaged over the measured initial momentum distribution of the atoms and over the inhomogeneous laser intensity. We have usedK1=K2= 10 at the center of the laser beam, in accordance with the value deduced from the laser power, detuning and geometrical properties. The only adjustable parameter is the ratio of eﬀective sizes of the standing wave and the Raman beams. Due to the non- linearity of the processes, this ratio (which is 2) is dif- ferent from ratio of the waists (4.8). For f1=f2= 36 kHz, we obtain a dynamically localized (exponential) dis- tribution with a localization length which agrees with the experimentally observed one (at the 10% level). For f2/f1= 1.083,the result of the simulation – shown in the ﬁgure – agrees very well with the experimental data. The fact that the broad contribution is signiﬁcantly larger than the “resonant” distribution – together with the fact that the classical diﬀusion constant is practicall y identical in the two cases – shows that diﬀusion has per- sisted during a longer time in the non-resonant case. Fur- thermore, the fact that the distribution is not exponential strongly suggests that we did not reach DL and that dif- fusion should persist for longer times. A simple and use- ful method to detect the presence of DL is to probe only the zero-velocity class: as DL corresponds to a thiner distribution, it also corresponds to a higher zero-velocit y signal in the localized case than in the diﬀusive case. In other words, the zero-velocity signal contains essentiall y the same information than e.g. the total average energy, but is much easier to measure. This allows us to sweep the frequency f2of the secondary kick, keeping all other parameters ( f1,φ,K1andK2) ﬁxed and search for the values of the frequency ratio presenting localization. The result is shown in Fig. 3. One clearly sees peaks at the simple rational values of r=f2/f1. Each peak is asso- ciated with an increased number of zero-velocity atoms,that is, an increased degree of localization. The most prominent peaks are associated with integer values of r, a rather natural result. Smaller peaks are associated with half-integers values of r, even smaller ones with r=p/3 rational numbers, etc... All these features are very well reproduced by the numerical simulation (performed as described above, with no adjustable parameter) shown in the inset of Fig. 3. The fact that the simulation dis- plays exactly the same behavior proves that it is not due to an experimental artifact. Classical numerical calcula- tions performed with the same parameters do not show any kind of localization, neither in the rational nor in the irrational case. The peaks are thus a purely quan- tum feature. We have also checked that the observed behavior does not sensitively change when f1is varied. This rules out the possible role of the so-called quantum reso- nances where the dynamics is dominated by the quasi- degeneracy between unperturbed Floquet eigenstates. The observed width of the 1:1 resonance is about 300 Hz, in good agreement with the numerical calculation. A detailed study of its width will be presented in the near future. In conclusion, we have shown that, in the presence of a quasi-periodic driving with two base frequencies, the kicked rotator does not show any “short time” dynami- cal localization except when the ratio of the frequencies is close to a rational number. In the latter case, the system is time-periodic and displays clear evidence of dynamical localization. This conclusion is drawn from experiments performed with both 50 and 100 primary kicks, whereas the localization time is of the order of 15 kicks. Longer kick sequences are impossible because of the free fall of the atoms under gravity, but numerical simulations show the same behavior up to few thousands kicks. Although it is currently impossible, experimentally or numerically , to decide if the DL is eﬀectively suppressed by the sec- ondary kicks or if it corresponds to a much longer local- ization time, the results presented here clearly evidence a dramatic change in the behavior of the system due to a secondary irrational frequency. Furthermore, the de- struction of DL by a secondary frequency is found to be a very sensitive phenomenon. The authors are grateful to M. Druon, J. Pesez and J. Courbe for aid with the experiments. Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes et Mol´ ecules (PhLAM) is UMR 8523 du CNRS et de l’Universit´ e des Sci- ences et Technologies de Lille. Centre d’Etudes et Recherches Lasers et Applications (CERLA) is supported by Minist` ere de la Recherche, R´ egion Nord-Pas de Calais and Fonds Europ´ een de D´ eveloppement Economique des R´ egions (FEDER). Laboratoire Kastler Brossel de l’Universit´ e Pierre et Marie Curie et de l’Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure is UMR 8552 du CNRS. CPU time on Cray C98 and T3E computers has been provided by IDRIS. 3FIG. 1. Experimental setup. A master diode laser mod- ulated at 4.6 GHz is used to inject two power slave Raman lasers producing phase-coherent, 9.2 GHz frequency-split , Ra- man beams. A power monomode diode laser is used to gen- erate the stationary wave, that can be pulsed through an acousto-optical modulator (mounted in double passing). Bo th the Raman and stationary wave beams are horizontal, making an angle of 12◦. 0.010.11Number of atoms -60-40-200204060 Momentum (recoil units)(a)(b)(c) FIG. 2. Typical momentum distributions (in logarithmic scale) corresponding to: (a) initial distribution produce d by the MOT, corresponding to a temperature of 3.3 µK; the ﬁt- ting curve (thin line) is a gaussian. (b) Momentum distri- bution obtained after the interaction of the atoms with two series of kicks having f2=f1= 36 kHz and a relative phase φ= 180◦; it displays the exponential shape characteristic of dynamical localization for a time-periodic quantum system ; the ﬁtting curve is exponential (thin line). (c) Momentum distribution after interaction with two series of kicks hav ing f2/f1= 1.0833 and initial relative phase φ= 180◦. The dis- tribution is broader, indicating the destruction of dynami cal localization in a quasi-periodic driven quantum system; th e ﬁtting curve is a numerical simulation (thin line); for deta ils, see text. The recoil momentum is ¯ hkL.0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60Zero velocity atoms 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Frequency ratio1 1/2 2 3/2 3/41/3 2/34/35/3 5/41/4(a) FIG. 3. The population of zero-velocity atoms (probed with the Raman signal) as a function of the frequency ra- tior=f2/f1(with f1= 36 kHz) and phase φ= 52◦. The increase of the zero-velocity signal is a signature of dynam - ical localization. Dynamical localization for commensura te frequencies – and simple rational rvalues – is clearly seen. For incommensurate frequencies, like in Fig. 2, no dynamica l localization is visible. The inset (a) shows the correspond ing curve obtained by numerical simulation (see text), very wel l reproducing the features of the experimental curve. [1] G. Casati, B.V. Chirikov, J. Ford and F.M. Izrailev, in Lecture Notes in Physics, 93, 334 (Springer, Berlin, 1979). [2] R. Graham, M. Schlautmann and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A45, R19 (1992). [3] F. L. Moore et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2974 (1994); J. C. Robinson et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3963 (1995). [4] H. Ammann, R. Gray, I. Shvarchuck, and N. Christensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4111 (1998). [5] B. G. Klappauf, W. H. Oskay, D. A. Steck, and M. G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1203 (1998). [6] D.R. Grempel, R.E. Prange and S. Fishman, Phys. Rev. A29, 1639 (1984). [7] G. Casati, I. Guarneri and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 345 (1989); ibid.Chaos, Solitons and Frac- tals1, 131 (1991); E. Doron and S. Fishman, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 867 (1988). [8] L. Moorman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 771 (1988). [9] V. Vuleti´ c, C. Chin, A. J. Kerman, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5768 (1998); M. Morinaga, I. Bouchoule, J.-C. Karam, and C. Salomon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4037 (1999). [10] J. Ringot, Y. Lecoq, J. C. Garreau and P. Szriftgiser, Eur. Phys. J. D. 7, 285 (1999). [11] J. Ringot et al., to be published. [12] D. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 44, 2292 (1991). 4
arXiv:physics/0006059v1 [physics.bio-ph] 23 Jun 2000modeling study on the validity of a possibly simpliﬁed repre sentation of proteins Jun Wang and Wei Wang National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure and Phys ics Department, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China (July 24, 2013) The folding characteristics of sequences reduced with a pos sibly simpliﬁed representation of ﬁve types of residues are shown to be similar to their original on es with the natural set of residues (20 types or 20 letters). The reduced sequences have a good folda bility and fold to the same native structure of their optimized original ones. A large ground s tate gap for the native structure shows the thermodynamic stability of the reduced sequences. The g eneral validity of such a ﬁve-letter reduction is further studied via the correlation between th e reduced sequences and the original ones. As a comparison, a reduction with two letters is found not to r eproduce the native structure of the original sequences due to its homopolymeric features. PACS numbers: 87.10+e I. INTRODUCTION Protein folding is a well known complicated and highly cooperative dynamic process due to the heterogeneity in proteins (e.g., see Refs. [1–3] and references therein). Much eﬀort has been made by considering minimalist models with a few types of amino acid residues to sim- plify the natural set of residues (of 20 types) for bet- ter physical understanding [4–9] and practical purposes [10–12]. In these models the compositions are much sim- pler than the real ones. The simplest reduction is the so- called hydrophobic and polar ones with only two groups of residues (each group including some types of residues) by considering the main driving force, the hydrophobicity [4–9]. Furthermore, these two groups actually are simpli- ﬁed as two eﬀective monomers or letters, namely H and P, which is known as the HP model [4]. The studies of such a model enable people to understand some funda- mental physics and mechanism of protein folding. How- ever, as argued in a number of studies (see [13] and refer- ence therein), the HP model may be too simple and lacks enough consideration on the heterogeneity and the com- plexity of the natural set of residues, such as the interac- tions between the residues [5,6,14]. Moreover, the mini- mal sets of residues for protein design suggested by bio- chemical experiments [10–12] seem unfavorable to those with only two types of residues since a small number of types obviously introduces the homopolymeric degener- acy. What is the suitable simpliﬁcation for natural pro- teins, or how many types of residues are necessary for reproducing some useful structures and for a simpliﬁed representation of protein sequence characteristics? Thes e are not well understood. Recently, Riddle and et al. made an exciting approach to the problems mentioned above experimentally [12]. By using combinatorial chemistry along with a screen- ing strategy, they searched and found out a subset of the natural amino acids that can be used to construct a well- ordered protein-like molecule consisting of β-sheets. This subset contains ﬁve amino acids [12], namely, isoleucine,alanine, glycine, glutamic acid and lysine, which are sim- ply represented as I, A, G, E and K [15]. Although about 30% of the residue sites in some of their sequences are not encoded by the ﬁve-letter palette, rather than by nine other types of residues, the sequence complexity of the protein is largely simpliﬁed. These uncoded sites are due to their direct involvement in binding a proline-rich sig- nal peptide. [if the binding was compromised, the pro- tein would not show up in the screening array [5,12].] They also found that subtractions of the ﬁve-letter code to a three-letter one may destroy the structural rebuild- ing. As argued by Wolynes [5], this experiment shows the possibility of simpliﬁcation for the protein sequence com- plexity, and that some complexity with ﬁve-letter code, but not three-letter code, might be still needed based on the landscape ideas. This experiment extends the search for minimal solution of the simpliﬁed representation of complex protein architecture. However, it is not clear whether the suggested 5-letter code is valid in general and feasible for elucidating characteristics of real prote ins with 20 kinds of amino acids. That is, is the 5-letter code based on a speciﬁc protein generally workable for other natural proteins? In this work, we address the questions mentioned above at the level of a lattice model with some contact- potential-form interactions. Based on the statistical and the kinetic characteristics of the folding, and on the ther- modynamic stability of the ground states of some re- duced sequences, we study the validity of two reductions, namely one with the ﬁve-letter palette I, A, G, E and K [12] and the other composed by two types of amino acids as an example of HP-like model. We ﬁnd that the ﬁve- letter reduced sequences display similar native structura l features and folding kinetic behavior to the optimal 20- letter ones. Diﬀerently, for the two-letter case, our resul ts show its deﬁciency to act as a good reduction for general representation of proteins. The ﬁve-letter reduction may be a suitable description for simplifying the sequences complexity of 20-letter model chains which may relate to the natural proteins. A detailed analysis on correlation between the sequences with 20-letters and their ﬁve-letter 1substitutes shows the source of such validity of the ﬁve- letter code. II. MODELS In general, a successful reduction implies that an origi- nal sequence with 20 types of residues can be represented by a new sequence with fewer types. The reduced se- quence should have the main statistical and structural characteristics, as well as the kinetic accessibility, as t hat of the original one, such as the basic residue components of the original sequence, the ground state or the native conformation, etc [7,9,16,17]. That is, after the reduc- tion, not only should the statistical characteristics of th e energy spectrum (the existence of a large ground state gap) be maintained, but also the folded structure should be kept the same as that of the original one (see Fig.1). Such a reduction is regarded as a good one. Nevertheless, if the energy gap is diminished, or the ground state of the reduced sequence is degenerate (or deviates from that of the original one), the thermodynamic stability and the kinetic characteristics are altered. Consequently, the re - duction is believed to be a bad one. Therefore, to explore the validity of simpliﬁed reduction means to verify it be- ing a good one or not. Let us start by considering a model protein which is assumed to be a chain with connected residues in a cubic lattice (Fig.2a). A self-avoided arrangement of the model chain on the lattice is generally noted as a structure or conformation of the model protein. The conformation of the model chain is characterized by the set {ri}, the spatial position of the i-th residue in the chain, and its sequence by {si}, the set of various types of residues as- signed along the chain. An example of such a chain is shown in Fig.2(a), with s1=V,s2=P, ands3=V, and so on, and the chain length is L= 27, i.e., 27 residues. The energy of the chain is determined by its sequence and conformation, E({si},{ri}) =L/summationdisplay i>jB(si, sj)∆(ri,rj), (1) where B(si, sj) is the contact potential between the i-th residue (with residue type si) and the j-th residue (with residue type sj), and the function ∆( ri,rj) = 1 when thei-th and the j-th residues are spatial, not sequential, neighbors and ∆( ri,rj) = 0 otherwise. To study the re- duction, a number of such sequences, say N= 100, made of the natural set of amino acids with 20 letters are all well optimized to a same native structure [the one shown in Fig.2(a)] using the methods proposed by Shakhnovich et al [18,19]. All these sequences are referred as “orig- inal” ones. These original sequences then are reduced according to a pre-selected ﬁve-letter reduction scheme as follows [14]: group-I (with residues C, M, F, I, L, V, W and Y), group-II (A, T and H), group-III (G andP), group-IV (D and E) and group-V (S, N, Q, R and K), with a representative residue for each group as I, A, G, E and K, respectively. That is, an original sequence is reduced into a sequence of ﬁve-letters by substitut- ing (or replacing) each letter with its representative let- ter. In such a reduction, 20 types of residues are divided into ﬁve groups according to their interaction character- istics (following the Miyazawa and Jernigan (MJ) matrix [20]). Each group contains some residues which interact with others in a similar way [14]. For example, group- I includes all the hydrophobic residues, and the other four contain the residues with polar features. Obviously, this ﬁve-group simpliﬁcation takes into account of more heterogeneities for the protein, and also considers more detailed diﬀerences between the polar residues than the two-letter HP model [5,14]. Then we take Baker’s 5-letter alphabet, I, A, G, E and K, as the best representative let- ters for ﬁve groups based on a physical reason, but not an arbitrary choice (A more detailed description and dis- cussion see Ref. [14,21]). The procedure to reduce the original sequences to two- letter cases is similar as above. Here, we consider group Hincluding residues C, M, F, I, L, V, W and Y, and group Pincluding the rest [4,6], and we pick the residues I and A as the representatives of group H and P, respec- tively. Some other choices, such as I and E, are also checked. It is found that these choices give out basically the same results. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Does the reduced sequence with ﬁve letters have the same folded native structure as that of the original one shown in Fig.2(a)? Let us make a statistics on the ratio of successful reduction ( RSR), for the reduced sequences. Because of the main attractive feature of the MJ inter- action matrix [20], the native state generally has a struc- tural motif with the form of maximally compact struc- ture. Besides, for the 27-mer model chain we studied, the compact conformations are generally understood as the 3 ×3×3 cube-shape structures [19,22–24]. Thus, the statistics on the RSR can be found out by enumerating all possible compact structures in the case of a 3 ×3×3 lat- tice [8]. Interestingly, almost 86 reduced sequences (out of 100) with ﬁve-letters are “foldable” since they have unique ground states. Among the foldable sequences, 74 keep the same native structure of the original sequences, termed as “folded”, and 12 have diﬀerent folded states, termed as “ground states deviation” [see Fig.2(b)]. This means that this ﬁve-letter strategy basically reproduces the original native structure with RSR of 74%. In ad- dition, there are 14 sequences that do not have unique ground states, termed “unfoldable”. As a comparison, the RSR is also evaluated for the HP reduction. It is found that there are a few foldable sequences, namely, three reduced sequences (out of 100) 2but with “ground states deviation”. That is, these three sequences fold to unique ground states which are diﬀer- ent from that of the native state of the original sequences, i.e., the RSR is 0. However, the existence of the unique ground states basically coincides with the result in Ref. [7] where there is only 4.57% of the sequences having unique ground states. Physically, it results from the ho- mopolymeric degeneracy as argued in Ref. [5] and found in other lattice simulations [25]. The biochemical exper- iments also approve this deﬁciency, since it is found that two types of residues are far insuﬃcient for the rebuild- ing of four-helix bundle proteins in protein engineering experiments and in de novo designs [10,11]. Diﬀerently, the ﬁve-letter case is quite good in over- coming the homopolymeric tendency. The similarity be- tween the ﬁve-letter case and the 20-letter case with a large value of RSR indicates the validity of the ﬁve- letter strategy in simplifying the natural proteins. It is noted that the selection of the optimal original sequences and their native structures is rather arbitrary without any bias on interactions and compositions. Several stud- ies on some other sequences with diﬀerent native struc- tures present similar results, which further implies that this ﬁve-letter reduction scheme is universal for diﬀer- ent structures. Therefore, the simpliﬁed depiction of the Riddle et al.’s ﬁve-letter substitutes may catch basically the physics of natural proteins in their structures. What kinetic characteristics then do the ﬁve-letter se- quences show? These are further studied by the stan- dard lattice Monte Carlo simulations [23,24]. The ther- modynamic quantities, such as heat capacity Cvof the model chains, are calculated based on the histogram al- gorithm over a collection of samples of conformations [23,26]. In our simulations, the native structures found in the above enumerations over various compact struc- tures are checked. It is found that the checked structures have uniquely minimal energies and frequently appear in the sampling for these structures. These ensure the thermodynamic stability and kinetic accessibility. It ap- proves their characteristics as native structures found in our enumerations. Therefore, the statistics on the RSR based on these kinetic Monte Carlo simulations shows basically the same value ﬁve-letter reduction as that ob- tained by enumerations. Similar results have also been obtained for the HP reduction. Furthermore, we use the foldability σ=\|Tθ−Tf\|/Tθ proposed by Klimov and Thirumalai [9] as an indicator of the kinetic characteristic for the system. Here Tθindi- cates the temperature corresponding to the peak of heat capacity of a model chain, and Tfmarks the structural transition to the well-ordered native structure during the folding processes, which corresponds to the maximum of the ﬂuctuation of structural overlap function χ(T) [9]. A small σis generally related to a fast folding with few kinetic traps. On the other hand, a large σ(≈1) may re- sult in many competitive local minima, and in this case a protein can not fold in a biologically relevant time scale. Thus, the factor σis argued as a criterion of the foldabil-ity [9] although there is a controversy on its deﬁnition [13]. The correlation between the factor σand folding ability has been illustrated in many cases (see Ref. [27] and references therein). Here, we use the factor σto characterize the foldability of our model chains. Note that we do not monitor the actual folding time of the model chains in our simulations, and our following dis- cussions on kinetics depend on the presumed relationship between the kinetics and thermodynamics, i.e., the fold- ability σproposed in Ref. [9]. A relevant discussion on such a relationship is recently made by Dinner et al[28]. We then calculate the foldability σfor the original se- quences and their ﬁve-letter and two-letter substitutes, respectively (see Fig.3, the solid circles). One can see that for the ﬁve-letter substitutes the foldability is σ= 0.46 which is smaller than 0 .6, a critical value of slow folding sequences [9]. This suggests that the native state is accessible kinetically for the ﬁve-letter reduction, an d shows the similar dynamics of two kinds of sequences, namely, the original ones and the reduced ones. Diﬀer- ently, for the two-letter case the foldability is σ≃1 much larger than 0.6, which means little kinetic accessibility of its native structure. In addition, some independently optimized sequences (i.e., some 20-letter sequences opti- mized with the ﬁve-letter or two-letter alphabet, respec- tively) are also studied. The values of σare found to be 0.25 and 0.75 for the ﬁve-letter and two-letter sequences, respectively, which shows clearly the improvement of the kinetic accessibility [9] due to the optimization for each sequence. Moreover, a similar exponential decreasing tendency can be seen (see Fig.3, the open diamonds). As a result, both exponential tendencies of decrease clearly imply the validity of a ﬁve-letter strategy. It is worth noting that in our simulations, a large num- ber of extended conformations are explored, not only the most compact conformations within the 3 ×3×3 cubic lattice. These kinetic folding simulations may be impor- tant for the case of longer chains since the non-compact conformations have more eﬀects on the folding features of the model proteins [13]. Fortunately, the competi- tion of non-compact structure as a native candidate may not be so serious in our case (see the remarks at the end of this sections). Certainly, for a more realistic and detailed study, we may need to make more extensively kinetic folding simulations on longer chains, which de- serves further work. However, we may believe that the basic physics is the same because many main characteris- tics of the folding have been found from the lattice model of proteins previously [2–9]. Now, let us discuss the correlation between the origi- nal sequences with 20-letter code and their substitutions with ﬁve-letter code. As we all know, there is mLpos- sible sequences for the proteins with mtypes of residues and length L. Can the optimized part of 20Lsequences be successfully mapped to 5Lsubstitutes as mentioned- above? To answer this question, we make a detailed analyses on the sequence set S0 20={S1 20, S2 20, S3 20,· · ·}in which all their substitutes with the ﬁve-letter reduction 3are the same, i.e., a single sequence S0 5. We randomly select a number of compact structures, say 50, from the ﬁve-letter spectrum as targets for design, i.e., optimizin g the sequences S0 20to lower energy [18,19]. In practice, from a sequence S0 5, we produce a number of sequences S1 20,S2 20,· · ·,S30 20, randomly following the reduction scheme. That is, each of I,A,G,E, and K is randomly substituted by a residue belonging to its corre- sponding group, e.g., A by A, T, or H randomly. Then for a certain target structure, we process the design for such a sequence Si 20by randomly exchanging their positions of two residues which belong to the same group (keeping the ﬁve-letter reduced sequence S0 5unchanged). The new sequence is accepted when the energy increment ∆ E <0, otherwise accepted with a probability P=exp(−∆E/T) withT= 0.1. Until 107new sequences are reached, the optimized sequence is found out for which its energy is the lowest one. The target is designable if its energy is the lowest one, otherwise undesignable. We ﬁnd three cases: 1) Undesignable compact struc- tures (UDS): Some compact structures never do become the native states of the set S0 20even after very long time optimization and very slow annealing (see Fig.4). 2) Des- ignable compact structures with small energy gaps for their ground states (DSSG): some compact structures are designable and the related sequences fold exactly into these structures. However, the energy gaps above their ground states are quite small, generally less than 0.5 (see Fig.4). According to the features of the protein energy spectrum, such small energy gaps result in an unstable ground state [3], and also many traps in the energy land- scape [2,3]. Thus these proteins may fold rather slow and may be unstable in their folded states. 3) Designable compact structure with large energy gaps for their ground states (DSLG): there exists a speciﬁc compact structure, namely, the native structure of the sequence S0 5. Tak- ing it as a design target, the designed sequences, from all of S0 20, not only fold to it, but also have large energy gaps and show good foldability (see Fig.4). This implies that a set of optimal sequences S′ 20that have the same ﬁve-letter reduced sequence shows stable folding and is included in the set S0 20,S′ 20∈S0 20. Thus, if two opti- mized sequences S′i 20andS′j 20have the same 5-letter re- duced sequence S0 5, they will behave the same in folding behavior as that of S0 5. [If sequences with 20 letters are optimized without the condition of keeping S0 5unchanged (see the preceding discussions), most of the optimized se- quences (about 74%) will have the same folding behavior after the substitution (see Fig.2(b))]. In other words, the complexity of the sequences S0 20can be simpliﬁed via the reduction since both the S0 5sequence and S0 20sequences behave almost the same in the aspects of folding kinet- ics and folded structure. Thus by the reduction the se- quence space (with 20 letters) can be reduced to many sets, and each set has a single ﬁve-letter sequence and a favorable native structure. In this level, the correlation of multiple-to-one between a set of 20-letter sequencesand a ﬁve-letter sequence is well established and ensures the similarity of two sequence spaces. Finally, it is noted that other ﬁve-letter reductions do not present such sim- pliﬁcation from the original sequences, and have a small (large) value of RSR (σ) since they are not the best rep- resentative letters for groups [14]. Finally, let us remark on our modeling study. It is ar- gued that the enumerations over only the compact struc- tures are questionable for searching the native state of a lattice chain [13,25]. Indeed, this is true for the usual HP model (with EHH=−1 and EHP=EPP= 0) [4] and that used by Li, et al. (with EHH=−2.3, EHP=−1, and EPP= 0) [7]. In those models, there are some binding interactions between residues, such as EPP= 0, that are as weak as that between a residue and solvent molecules. This may mean that there is little dif- ference in energies between the compact structures and the non-compact ones in those models [13], which intro- duces some limits in enumeration analysis. However, the interactions for our chains, not only for 20-letter chains, but also for the ﬁve-letter cases and two-letter cases, are taken from the MJ matrix directly, which has an obvious attraction between any pairs of residues. Thus, there is a large energy penalty for the extended structures with fewer bonds, i.e., an energy bias towards maximally com- pact structure. It improves the stability of the compact structures in our analysis. This makes our search for the native structures by enumerations over the set of compact structures feasible. In addition, the lattice chains with 2 7 monomers are shorter than those analyzed in Ref. [25]. As a result, we believe that in our cases the determina- tion of the native structures based on the enumerations over compact structures is appropriate, though there is a mixing between the energy spectrum (the energy lev- els above the native state) of the compact structures and those of the non-compact structures, which may aﬀect the kinetic properties. In practice, the native structures obtained by enumerations in our work are veriﬁed by the Monte Carlo kinetic simulations. That is, for our cases, especially the ﬁve-letter chains, we have not found any other states with lower energy than the native structures during very-long-time simulations. Besides, using enu- meration over compact structures is more eﬀective than the kinetic simulations, which enables us to make an ex- tensive search over the sequence space on the structural rebuilding problem, as interested in our work. IV. SUMMARY In this work, the ﬁve-letter code for simpliﬁcation of proteins suggested by Riddle et al. [12] is found to be valid not only keeping the features of the energy spectrum but also reproducing the native structure of the sequences with the natural set of residues. The kinetic resemblance between the sequences composed with 20 letters and ﬁve- letters also implies a similarity of their funnel character - 4istic. This illustrates that the lattice model of proteins with natural set of residues can be re-constructed with a smaller set of residues, maybe ﬁve types of residues. Thus our study suggests that the ﬁve-letter code can act as a suitable simpliﬁcation considering more heterogeneity of the model proteins, and may encode the main informa- tion for model proteins. In addition, since that the fold- ing kinetics in real proteins and lattice models is believed to be similar in many aspects [2,3,7], our simulations on the lattice chains may provide some understanding on the simpliﬁcation of real proteins. As a comparison, the unfavorable reductions with two types of residues may in- dicate that the proteins with a natural set of residues are too complex to be simpliﬁed by the two-letter representa- tions. That is, the minimal solution of protein simpliﬁca- tion could not be as simple as the HP models, at least in lattice level. This actually coincides with the conclusion in several protein design experiments [10,11,29]. Finally , we note that an exact and detailed grouping of residues for the simpliﬁcation representation of proteins still nee ds more theoretical and experimental explorations. V. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS * W.W. acknowledges support from the Outstanding Young Research Foundation of the National Natural Sci- ence Foundation of China (Grant No. 19625409). We thank C. Tang for a critical reading of the manuscript. The numerical simulations in this work were done on the SGI Origin 2000 in the National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure, Nanjing University. [1] R. Elber, Recent Developments in Theoretical Studies of Proteins (World Scientiﬁc Publishing, Singapore, 1996); T. E. Creighton, Protein Folding (Freeman, NY, 1992), Chapter 4. [2] K. A. Dill and H. S. Chan, Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 10 (1997). [3] P. G. Wolynes, J. N. Onuchic, and D. Thirumalai, Sci- ence267, 1619 (1995). [4] K. F. Lau and K. A. Dill, Macromolecules 22, 3986 (1989); H. S. Chan and K. A. Dill, ibid.22, 4559 (1989). [5] P. G. Wolynes, Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 871 (1997). [6] H. Li, C. Tang and N. S. Wingreen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 765 (1997). [7] H. Li, R. Helling, C. Tang and N. S. Wingreen, Science 273666, (1996). [8] E. I. Shakhnovich and A. M. Gutin, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 5967 (1990). [9] D. K. Klimov and D. Thirumalai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4070 (1996); T. Veitshans, D. K. Klimov & D. Thiru- malai, Folding Des. 2, 1 (1997). [10] L. Regan and W. F. Degrado, Science 241, 976 (1988).[11] S. Kamtekar, J. M. Schiﬀer, H. Xiong, J. M. Babik and M. H. Hecht, Science 262, 1680 (1993). [12] D. S. Riddle, J. V. Santiago, S. T. BrayHall, N. Doshi, V. P. Grantcharova, Q. Yi and D. Baker, Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 805 (1997). [13] E. I. Shakhnovich, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 29 (1997). [14] Jun Wang and Wei Wang, Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 1033 (1999). [15] C. K. Mathews and K. E. Holde, Biochemistry (Benjamin Cummings, New York, 1996), Chap. 5. [16] V. Pande, A. Grosberg and T. Tanaka, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 9482 (1995). [17] M. Vendruscolo, A. Maritan and J. Banavar, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 3967 (1997). [18] E. I. Shakhnovich, Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 3907 (1994). [19] E. I. Shakhnovich and A. M. Gutin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90,7195 (1993). [20] S. Miyazawa and R. Jernigan, J. Mol. Biol. 256, 623 (1996). [21] H. S. Chan, Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 994 (1999). [22] A. Sali, E. I. Shakhnovich and M. Karplus, Nature 369, 248 (1994). [23] N. D. Socci and J. N. Onuchic, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4732 (1995). [24] N. Socci and J. Onuchic, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1519 (1994). [25] K. Yue, K. Fiebig, P. Thomas, H. S. Chan, E.I. Shakhnovich and K. A. Dill, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 325 (1995). [26] A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2635 (1988); [27] D. Thirumalai and D. K. Klimov, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.9, 197 (1999). [28] A. R. Dinner, V. Abkevich, E. Shakhnovich and M. Karplus, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet. 35, 34 (1999). [29] K. W. Plaxco, D. S. Riddle, V. Grantcharova and D. Baker, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 80 (1998). Fig.1. Sketchy view of the reduction. For the op- timal sequences, S1 20,S2 20and so on, with 20 types of residues, there exist large ground state gaps for their na- tive structures in the energy spectrum. A good reduction should retain similar spectrum features and keep the na- tive structures (see Substitute I). A bad reduction dimin- ishes the energy gap above ground state, and the original native structure is not located on lowest energy level. Fig.2. (a) A target of folding, and an original opti- mized sequence of L=27 residues (with 20 types) and its ﬁve-letter and HP substitutes. (b) Ratio of successful re- duction RSRfor 100 original optimized sequences and its ﬁve-letter and two-letter (HP) substitutes. The “folded”, “ground state deviation” and “unfoldable” are deﬁned in the text. The interactions between the ﬁve letters I, A, G, E and K, and those between the two letters I and A (or I and E) follow the MJ matrix. The results are the same for those two two-letter cases. 5Fig.3. Foldability σversus type number of the reduc- tion based on the Monte Carlo simulations. The solid circles indicate the case of direct substitutes for 50 orig- inal optimized sequences, and the open diamonds for 50 random sequences optimized with the ﬁve-letter or two- letter alphabet. The interactions are described in Fig.2.Fig.4. Statistics of design. (a) The ratio of successful folding to the target (RSF). For each target, RSF is ob- tained by averaging over 30 runnings of optimization; (b) ∆1, ground state gaps averaged over all 30 runnings of op- timization (including the unique and degeneracy ground states). (c) ∆ 2, ground state gaps averaged only over the unique ground states. The interactions are described in Fig.2. The marked positions indicate designs for diﬀerent structures(see the text). 6Substitute II bad reductiongood reductionSubstitute I20-letter cases S1S2S3 Structure Kept Figure 1. By Jun Wang and Wei Wang In “Validity…”/G1 74%12% 14% unfoldable ground state deviation100% folded2-letter case 5-letter case20-letter case 97%3% Figure 2 By Jun Wang and Wei Wang In "Validity ..."(b) (a) HPPPHPPPPPHPPPPPPPHPPPPPPHHIEKGIEGAKGIAKAGAGEIAKEKGKIIFDNPCDPHSPVTNAGTPECTNDKPRLY original: 5-letter: 2-letter:0 5 10 15 200.00.20.40.60.81.0 Figure 3 By Jun Wang and Wei Wang in "Validity ..." Original sequences and their substitues Independent optimized chainFoldability σ Number of groups0.00.30.60.9 RSF 0.00.30.60.9 Δ1 51015202530354045500.00.30.60.9 /G27/G36/G2F/G2A/G27/G36/G36/G2A /G38/G27/G36 Figure 4 By Jun Wang and Wei Wang in "Validity ..."Target structure index Δ2
arXiv:physics/0006060v1 [physics.ao-ph] 23 Jun 2000Remote sensing ofbubble cloudsinseawater Piotr J. Flatau, Maria Flatau Scripps Institutionof Oceanography,University ofCalifo rnia, San Diego, La Jolla, California92093-0221. e-mailpﬂatau@ucsd.edu J.R.V. Zaneveld Oregon State University, USA CurtisD. Mobley Sequoia Scientiﬁc, Inc., USA In press: 2000,Quarterly Journalofthe RoyalMeteorologic al Society February9, 2008 Abstract We report on the inﬂuence of submerged bubble clouds on the re mote sensing properties of water. We show that the optical effect of bubbles on radiat ive transfer and on the estimate of the ocean color is signiﬁcant. We present a global map of th e volume fraction of air in waterderived from dailywindspeed data. Thismap, together withtheparameterization of the microphysical properties, shows the possible signiﬁcance of bubble clouds on the albedo of incoming solar energy. Keyword: Remote sensing reﬂectance, Bubble clouds, Radiat ive transfer 1 Introduction “The effect of bubbles on the color of the sea may be observed i n breaking waves... Where a great many bubbles have been entrained by a breaking wave it i s white. But where there are fewer of them it is blue-green or green, brighter than the sea but not as bright as the foamiest parts of the wave. Even after a wave has broken and the water is again quiescent, a pastel green patch often remains, slowly fading into the surroundi ng sea as the bubbles dissipate. Thus the effect of bubbles on the color of the sea is similar to that of solid particles (Bohren, 1987).” Bubbles within the water and foam on its surface (Buk ata, 1995; Frouin et al., 1996; 1Stramski,1994)canpredominateindeterminingtheradiati vetransfer propertiesoftheseasur- face at higher wind speeds. However, there is alimited knowl edge about the radiative transfer properties of bubble clouds, their inherent optical proper ties (IOP), and their global climatol- ogy. Mobley (1994) and Bukata (1995) discuss qualitatively the surface properties of bubble clouds. Frouin et al. (1996) performed spectral reﬂectance measurements of sea foam at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Pier. They observed a d ecrease of the foam reﬂectance inthe near-infrared and proposed that the foam reﬂectance c an not bedecoupled from the ref- electance by bubbles. Stramski (1994) concentrates on ligh t scattering by submerged bubbles inquiescent seas and showsthe scattering coefﬁcient and th e backscattering coefﬁcient at 550 nm in comparison with scattering and backscattering coefﬁc ients of sea water as estimated fromthechlorophyll-based bio-optical modelsforCase1wa ters. Inthisexploratory paper, we reportontheinﬂuenceofbubblecloudsgeneratedbybreakin gwavesontheremotesensingre- ﬂectance and calculate not only the inherent optical, but al so apparent optical properties using the radiative transfer model. Weshow that the optical effec ts of bubbles on remote sensing of theoceancolor aresigniﬁcant. Furthermore, wepresent agl obal mapofvolumefractionofair in water. This map, together with the parameterization of th e microphysical properties, shows thesigniﬁcance of bubble clouds ontheglobal albedo of inco ming solar energy. Byproxy, we show the inﬂuence of the bubble clouds on the remote sensing r etrieval of organic and inor- ganiccomponents ofthenatural waters. Itisworthmentioni ng thatthebubble cloudscoincide with the upper range of the euphotic zone and will, therefore , contribute to the dynamics of the upper-ocean boundary layer, heat distribution, and sea surface temperature (Thorpe et al., 1992). In fact, our initial motivation for this work was an ob servation that the asymptotic radiance distribution is established close to the ocean sur face in apparent contradiction with theoretical studies (Flatau et al., 1999). Thus, the light ﬁ eld must become diffuse at shallower depths than usually modeled. This leads to search for altern ative mechanisms inﬂuencing the light distribution. Thus, the importance to light scatteri ng of the bubble clouds goes beyond theremote sensing issues considered inthis work. In the next section, we discuss in more detail the microphysi cal and morphological prop- erties of bubble clouds, because they have a direct bearing o n their optical properties and radiative transfer. 2 Physicalpropertiesof bubbleclouds 2.1 Morphologyof bubble clouds innatural waters Individual bubblecloudsaregeneratedbybreakingwaves,p ersistforseveralminutes(Thorpe, 1995), and reach to mean depths of about 4Hs, where Hsis the signiﬁcant wave height, but with some clouds extending to about 6Hs. There is evidence that at high wind speeds, sepa- rate bubble clouds near the surface coalesce, producing a st ratus layer (Thorpe, 1995). Fig 1 is based on a sonograph of Thorpe (1984). The “bubble-strato cumulus” (b-Sc) is often ob- served by acoustic means (Farmer and Lemon, 1984; Thorpe, 19 95). The depth of the b-Sc layer is related to the wind speed and wind variability, but m ore speciﬁcally it is set by larger waves, such us those breaking predominantly in groups (Thor pe, 1995). The “stratus layer” description should not be taken too literally. For sufﬁcien tly high winds there will be signiﬁ- 2cantconcentrations throughouttheupperlayer, butthevar iabilitywithinthislayercanbevery high. Figure 1: Bubble-stratocumulus (b-Sc) layer generated by b reaking waves with inhomogeneous deeperintrusions. Thedepthofthecloudisrelated to thema ximumsigniﬁcantwaveheight. 2.2 Bubble cloud climatology AccordingtoThorpeetal.(1992)intheabsenceofprecipita tion andinwindspeedsexceeding about 3 m s−1, wave breaking generally provides the dominant source of bu bbles. The wind speed W10at 10 m above the mean sea surface level is used to parameteriz e the volume frac- tion of air in water, f=Vair/Vw, where Vairis the volume of air, and Vwis the volume of water. This parameterization is an approximation of a more c omplex wind-wave relationship. Figure2showsthevolumefractionofairinwaterestimatedf romthe W10windsforJanuaryof 1992. Thevolumefraction andthewindspeedareassumed tofo llowanon-linear relationship (Walsh and Mulhearn, 1987) f=f0W4.4 10+f1 (1) The coefﬁcients f0andf1were calculated at 2m assuming that f= 10−8forW10= 6.2m s−1 and f= 10−7forW10= 10.5m s−1(Walsh and Mulhearn, 1987). Vagle and Farmer (1992) show that the volume fraction decreases with depth, changin g from about 10−6at 0.3 m to 10−7at 2.7m. Webase ourparameterization ontheseﬁndings andex trapolate (1)tonear-sea- surface depth using exponential ﬁt. The monthly averages of fwere obtained by employing 1992 daily surface winds from the NCAR/NCEP (Kalnay et al., 1996) reanalysis project, and averaging the daily volume fractions for each month. Thus, Figure 2 is based on the varia bility of the wind ﬁeld on the scaleofoneday. Inthewinterofthenorthernhemisphere, on ecanobservemaximaassociated with the midlatitude storm tracks in the Northern Paciﬁc. Cy clogenesis, common in western parts of the oceans during the winter, contributes to mixing and a large bubble cloud volume fraction. This can be observed to the east of the North Americ an continent. The Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) region, with its associated deep co nvection, may also be a region of enhanced production of bubbles. The winds of the Southern Ocean have a strong effect on bubble formation during both summer and winter. In subtropi cal regions, to the west of the continents, the subsidence associated with the descending branch of the Hadley circulation is 3Figure2: January1992, monthlyaveraged volumefraction. V olumefraction ×106. 4responsiblefortherelativeminimumin f. Itshouldbestressedthattheseresultsarequalitative andthattheycanbeimprovedbymoredetailedbreakingwavec limatology models(Krausand Businger, 1994). Thedata inFig2isindicative ofregions wh erebubble clouds arepotentially important inthe interpretation of remotely sensed reﬂecta nce. 2.3 Opticalthickness Thesizedistribution ofbubblecloudsdetermines theoptic al thicknessandis,therefore, oneof themostcritical parametersenteringthetheory. Thereare twoassumptions whichsimplifythe developmenthere: (a)weconsider lightscatteringinthege ometricopticsregimeforwhichthe ratio proportional to bubble radius to wavelength x= 2πr/λis large and (b) we assume that there isaneffective radius reﬀwhich determines the optical properties of the size distrib ution. Both (a) and (b) are quite probable. The size parameter, x= 50, corresponding to a bubble radius of approximately 5 µm, is already in the geometric optics regime, and reﬀ= 10µm will satisfy (a). For bubbles with an effective radius of reﬀ, the volume attenuation (equal to scattering for anon-absorbing sphere) can beexpressed as b=QscaN Vws= 2Vair VwN Vairs= 2fs v. (2) Thus b= 2f reﬀ(3) where s=πr2isthecross-section ofabubble withradius r,visthevolumeofsuch abubble. Nis the number of bubbles in volume Vwof water and fis the fraction of air in a volume of water. The effective radius is deﬁned as reﬀ=v/s(Stephens et al., 1990; King et al., 1993; Bricaud and Morel, 1986). Scattering efﬁciency deﬁnes how m uch of incoming light is being “blocked” byaparticle byscattering processes, for large s izeparameters Qscatendsto2. This issue is discussed indetail by Bohren and Huffman (1983). The physical signiﬁcance of fcomes from the fact that it is determined by the large scale forcing such asthe windﬁeld. Thus, for agiven synoptic or cl imatological setting, themixing ratiofis, tosome extent, pre-determined. Onthe other hand, the ef fective radius reﬀdepends on processes of much smaller scale then the large scale. Thes e processes are coagulation, coalescence, coating by organic material, saturation, buo yancy, pressure, etc. Thus, Eq. 3 de- ﬁnesthe optical properties of bubble clouds on both the larg e- and sub-scales. Theexpression b= 2f/reﬀholds for polydispersions, and the only difference with a mo nodispersion is that reﬀis deﬁned via distribution averaged sandv. 2.4 Effectiveradius ofthe size distribution Numerous observations of bubble size distributions are rep orted in the literature based on acoustic, photographic, optical, and holographic methods (Wu, 1988a). Akulichev and Bu- lanov (1987) summarize results from 22 experiments using di fferent techniques. As the ori- ginsofbubblesarebiological (withinthevolumeandattheb ottom), aswellasphysical (atthe rough surface), wemay expect large regional and temporal va riations of bubble concentration 5betweencoastalandopenoceanicwatersandbetweenplankto nbloomorno-bloom conditions (Thorpe et al.,1992). Figure 3presents acomparison of bubble spectra under break ing waves andquiescent sea. Recently published observations, using laser holography n ear the ocean surface, have shown that the densities of 10 to 15 µm radius bubbles can be as high as 106(per cubic meter per micron radius increment) within 3 m of the surface of quiesce nt seas (O’Hern et al., 1988). These results are plotted as solid squares connected with a v ertical solid line. The majority of bubbles injected into the surface layers of natural waters i s unstable, either dissolving due to enhanced surface tension and hydrostatic pressures or risi ng to the air-water interface where the bubbles break (Johnson and Wangersky, 1987). However, b ubbles with long residence times, i.e. stable microbubbles, have been observed. For ex ample Medwin (1977) observed nearly 2.5×106of bubbles per cubic meter in the radius range 18−355µm for small wind speeds. Oneofthestabilization mechanisms (Mulhearn, 198 1; Johnson andWangersky, 1987) assumes that the surfactant material is a natural degradati on product of chlorophyll, present in almost all photosynthesizing algae. Isao et al. (1990) ha ve observed very large populations of neutrally buoyant particles with radii between 0.1−1µm. Johnson and Wangersky (1987) and Thorpe et al. (1992) proposed another stabilization mec hanism based on monolayers of adsorbed particles. Numerical modeling (Thorpe et al., 199 2) can be used to study the effects ofwatertemperature, dissolvedgassaturationlevels,and particulateconcentrations onthesize distribution of subsurface bubbles. The results of such num erical models provide additional evidence fortheexistence of asmallsizebubble fraction wh ichisnot adequately measured by acoustic or photographic techniques. The dashed line on Fig . 3 presents the mean concentra- tion in the model steady-state for the water temperature of 0 C. It can be seen that maximum concentration isaround 15µmanditis2.5ordersofmagnitude largerthanfor100 µmbubbles. Other results presented (Figure 3) are those of Johnson and C ooke (1979) observations at 4m in wind speed 11-13 m s−1(open squares). In situ acoustic measurements of microbubb les at sea by Medwin (1977) are plotted as solid triangles. The so lid triangles joined by a solid line are concentrations at 4m depth and 3.3m s−1wind speed. These spectra were obtained on August 7, 1975 in Monterey Bay. The solid triangles are for mi dafternoon, February 10-16, 1965 at Mission Bay, SanDiego, 3m below the surface, and in 1. 7-2.8m s−1winds. Theopen triangles are from Baldy (1988) and include data at 30cm dept h with wind and swell and at 25cmwithwindonly. Theyarebasedonextensivelaboratorye xperiments. Thesolidhexagons are data from Medwin and Breitz (1989) acoustic measurement s obtained in the open sea at 25cm depth under the water surface during 12 m s−1winds under spilling breakers. The lit- erature reviewed here and encapsulated in Figure 3 is a mixtu re of descriptions of the effect of active wave breaking, and of stabilised microbubbles obs erved largely in coastal situations. Currently, itisnot clearhowtoparameterise thestabilize d bubbles. Fromresults suchasthose presented in Fig. 3 in the case of “transient,” open ocean bub bles, it can be estimated that the size distribution follows the power law dependence n(r)∝r−aanda≈4(Walsh and Mulhearn, 1987; Wu, 1988a). Eventhough small microbubbles maynot contribute tothetotal mass, they may be important for the light scattering. Theref ore, it is of interest to estimate the contribution of small bubbles to the optical thickness. Assuming that microbubbles are spherical ( Vair= 4/3πr3N) we can show that the optical thickness ( τ=bh) of a layer with geometrical thickness his b∝hV2/3 airN1/3(4) 6Figure 3: Comparison of bubble spectra under breaking waves and quiescent sea. The solid squaresconnectedwiththeverticalsolidlinearefromlase rholographicdataO’Hernetal.(1988). Open triangles are from Baldy (1988)and includedataat 30cm depth with windand swell, and at 25cmwithwindonly. ThesolidhexagonsaredatabasedonMedw inandBreitz(1989)obtainedin the open sea at 25cm depth under the water surface during wind s of 12 m s−1. The solid triangles joinedbythesolidlineandsolidtrianglesareaveragebubb ledensitiesmeasuredundercomparable conditions at different seasons. The solid triangles joine d by solid lines are concentrations at 4m depth, 3.3 m s−1wind speed, obtained on August 7, 1975 in Monterey Bay. The so lid triangles are for midafternoon, February 10-16, 1965 at Mission Bay, S an Diego, 3m below the surface, 1.7-2.8 m s−1winds. The dashed line is from a numerical model (Thorpe et al ., 1992). The mean concentration in the steady-state model are plotted at temp erature 0C. The open squares show (Johnsonand Cooke, 1979)observationsat4m inwindspeed 11 -13m s−1.7BothhandVairare assumed to be ﬁxed. It can be seen from Eq. 4 that the contri bution to optical thickness byverysmall particles willbethesameas that byverylarge particles iftheir concentration varies as N3(or steeper). Indeed is the case (Walsh and Mulhearn, 1987; W u, 1988a). What remains to be deﬁned is the effective radius reﬀ. On the basis of measurements, estimates of small particle fraction, existence of backgro und 1µm microbubbles, modeling predictions, and steep slope of microbubble size distribut ions, wedecided to use reﬀ= 10µm as a typical “radiative response radius.” This choice does n ot exclude existence of larger or smaller particles. The real value may be between 1µm for stabilized particles and 50µm for the open ocean and will depend on many environmental factors such as storm passage, wind speed, swell, windvariability, phytoplankton concentrat ion, water temperature, gassaturation, andother properties. The10-15 fold increase inthesize of e ffective radius orsimilar decrease in the air volume fraction will reduce the importance of air b ubbles to a very small effect. It may be instructive to calculate the scattering coefﬁcien tbfor typical size distribution of bubbles in water. Insuch case wehave b=/integraldisplay Qscaπr2dN(r) Vw(5) orb= 2fs/vwhere s=/integraltextπr2dN(r)andv=/integraltext4/3πr3dN(r), anddN(r)is the number of bubbles between randr+drinavolumeofwater Vw. Fortypical sizedistribution ofbubbles inwater dN(r)/dr∝1/r4wehave reﬀ=4 3ln(r1/r0)//parenleftbigg1 r0−1 r1/parenrightbigg (6) Consider r1= 150andr0= 10micrometers. This gives reﬀ∼3.6r0which shows that the choice of small bubble cut-off is important for the bubbles’ optical properties. However, the choiceofthiscutoffisnon-trivial becausethespectrumof smallbubblesisnotunderstoodwell at present. We close this section with some general comment about the eff ective radius. It is not a directly measurable quantity and, in essence, it deﬁnes ho w dispersed the given amount of massis. Scatteringofincomingsolarradiationissensitiv etototalprojectedsurfaceratherthan to total mass. For this reason the effective radius is common ly used in radiation calculations. However, it should be stressed that the effective radius is a semi-inherent optical property because it carries information not only about the size itsel f, but also about the orientation of particles, their morphology, coating, size distribution, or departure from a spherical shape. In addition, estimates of effective radius, as used in satelli te remote sensing, often contain bias duetounrealistic assumptions about other optical propert ies suchasoptical thickness, leakage of photons due to horizontal transfer, wavelengths, or tech nique employed in retrieval. In that sense the effective radius isalso used (or abused) as asemi- apparent optical property. 3 Results 83.1 Numericalmodel The numerical radiative transfer model used in this study is a slightly modiﬁed version of the Hydrolight 3.0 code (Mobley, 1994; Mobley et al., 1994). In b rief, this model computes from ﬁrst principles the radiance distribution within, and leav ing, any plane-parallel water body. Input to the model consists of the absorbing and scattering p roperties of the water body, the nature of the wind-blown sea surface and of the bottom of the w ater column, and the sun and skyradiance incident onthe sea surface. Pureseawater absorption andscattering coefﬁcients are de termined from thedata of Pope and Fry (1997). 35 model wavebands were speciﬁed to cover the 400-700 nm region with a typical resolution of 10nm. Thewater column wasspeciﬁed as inﬁnitely deep. Upto62depth layers, extending to 50 meters, were speciﬁed with a resolut ion of 0.5 m close to the surface. Aclear skywasassumed, but thediffuse skyradiance wasincl uded. Threeor four component systems wereconsidered, consisting of purewater, particu lates withor without bubble clouds, and dissolved organic matter. The spectral absorption of di ssolved organic matter wasdeﬁned as a(λ) =a(λ0)exp[−0.014(λ−λ0)] (7) where a(λ0) = 0.1 m−1,λ0= 440nm (Bricaud et al., 1981). The phase function of phyto- plankton was deﬁned as an average of Petzold’s clear ocean, c oastal ocean, and turbid harbor cases (Mobley, 1994; Tyler, 1977). The bubble cloud phase fu nction was calculated for the real relative refractive index m= 0.75as an average for the size parameter range between x= 100−300with a resolution ∆x= 1using Wiscombe (Fiedler-Ferrari et al., 1991) code. Figure 4 compares Petzold and bubble phase functions. The ma in reason for the size distri- bution average was to remove transient spikes. This normali zed phase function is scaled by b calculated from Eq.3. Thevolume scattering and absorption coefﬁcients for particulates were determined from the Gordon-Morel model (Mobley, 1994; Gord on and Morel, 1983; Morel, 1988) bp=550 λ0.3C0.62(8) aCase1(λ) = [aw(λ) + 0.06a⋆ c(λ)C0.65][1 + 0 .2exp(−0.014(λ−440))] (9) Hereaw(λ)istheabsorptioncoefﬁcientofpurewater, a⋆ cisthechlorophyll-speciﬁc absorption coefﬁcient, and Cis the chlorophyll concentration in mg m−3(Mobley, 1994). The chloro- phyll concentration was set as constant (well-mixed) with d epth and equal to 0.8 mg m−3or 0.08mg m−3. We used Case 1 water parameterization but assumed that not a ll dissolved or- ganic material is correlated with the chlorophyll concentr ation. In an apparent contradiction, thewindspeed whichdeﬁnedsurface reﬂectance andtransmit tance functions duetothewind- blown water surface was set to 0. The reason for this was to est imate the effect on remote sensing properties of the sub-surface bubble clouds. Howev er, we investigated the sensitivity of the reﬂectance to change in the wind speed between 0 and 10 ms−1, and the effect was smallcomparedtotheinﬂuenceofbubbles. Theazimuthdirec tion wasdividedinto24equally spaced sectors, the zenith-nadir range was divided into 20 e qually spaced sectors. The proﬁle of the bubble cloud volume fraction wasdetermined by theexp ression f(z) =f0(f1/f0)p(10) 9Figure4: Unpolarizedphasefunctionforauniformdistribu tionofbubblesbetweensizeparameter 100 and 300 and refractive index m= 3/4as a function of scattering angle θ. Also shown is Petzold’sphasefunction. Thebubblephasefunctionhas pea k at 70degrees. 10where f0=f(z0) = 10−6,f1=f(z1) = 10−7,z0= 0m,z1= 8m,and p= (z−z0)/(z1− z0). Our choice of the speed of attenuation is perhaps unreasona bly gradual, except for the case of stable microbubbles. On the other hand this choice is of secondary importance for the remote sensing properties of bubble clouds which are domina ted by the surface volume frac- tion. In-water asymptotic light ﬁeld is discussed by Flatau et al. (1999). The scattering was conservative. Thevolumeattenuationwasdeterminedfromt heasymptoticexpression(3). The probabilitydistribution functionforscatteringwasdisc retized andwassetasconstant through- out the depth range. We calculated the asymmetry parameter t o beg≈0.85. This parameter deﬁnesthe probability of photon scattering towards thefor ward or backward hemisphere. Itis equal to 1if all photons are scattered forward and to-1if all photons are scattered backward. 3.2 Remotesensing reﬂectance The reference model runs were performed with the 3 component system of phytoplankton, purewater, andDOMwithaconstant chlorophyll proﬁle. Twoc ases werecomputed (but only oneispresented), representative ofclear coastal ( C= 0.8)andoceanic( C= 0.08)water. The remote sensed reﬂectance is deﬁned as Rrs(λ) =Lw(λ) Ed(λ)(11) where Edis the downwelling irradiance onto the sea surface, and Lw(λ)is the upwelling water-leaving radiance. The remote-sensing radiance is a m easure (Mobley, 1994) of how muchofthedownwellinglightthatisincident ontothewater surfaceisreturnedintothezenith direction. The remote sensing reﬂectances are plotted in Fi g. 5. The physical importance of theremote-sensing reﬂectanceisevidentfromasymptotict heorieswhichrelate Rrstoinherent optical properties (Zaneveld, 1995) Rrs∝β(π−θm) a(12) where βis the phase function, θmis related to the sun zenith angle, and ais the absorp- tion coefﬁcient. Thus, Rrsis approximately proportional to the probability of back- o r side- scattering, and inversly proportional to the absorption of water column. Figure 5 shows the remote-sensing reﬂectanceforthe3-and4-component syste mwithandwithoutoceanbubbles but with constant pigment amount. The total single scatteri ng albedo is strongly inﬂuenced by scattering from air bubbles. This leads to enhanced reﬂec tance at all wavelengths. The results for C= 0.08(not presented) show even larger sensitivity. In Fig 5 the gr ay rectangles indicate bands (wavelenghts) which are used by the current o cean color satellite instrument (SeaWiFS). It is of interest to comment on the remote sensing of pigments and bubble cloud retrievals. Consider an algorithm based on the ratio of remo te-sensing reﬂectance and deﬁne theratio of remote-sensing reﬂectances without (Chl) and w ith (Chl+b) microbubbles as ratio(λ) =RChl rs/RChl+b rs. (13) Figure 6 shows ratio(λ). Performance of the pigment algorithms based on the ratio of re- ﬂectances will depend on ratio(λ1)/ratio(λ2). Submerged microbubble clouds seem to be 11wavelength-selective and even the ratio algorithms may req uire slight systematic correction. Given the increased sensitivity of the current generation o f ocean color instruments, the ab- solute value of the radiances at the top of the atmosphere can be used for pigment retrievals. 4 Summary Our calculations indicate that the optical effects of subme rged microbubbles on the remote sensing reﬂectance of the ocean color are signiﬁcant. These results are of importance for the retrievals of pigments from the ocean color measurements an d for studies of the energetics of the ocean mixed layer. We provide information on how to reduc e the systematic error due to microbubbles in pigment retrieval schemes via the ratio(λ). We also derive apparent optical property of bubbles - remote sensing reﬂectance - for the who le solar spectrum. This AOP is directly observable by the satellites and remote sensors . We expect that these and similar AOPswillhavetobeinvokedinthecaseofhyperspectralretr ievalsforCase2waterswherethe signals from minerals, bubbles, chlorophyll, and dissolve d organic material (CDOM) are not wellcorrelated. Newalgorithmsforcurrentsatelliteinst rumentssuchasMODISandSeaWIFS should employ this information. Wealsopresentaglobalmapofthevolumefractionofairinwa terderivedfromdailywind speed data. Weexpect that suchamapcanbeimproved byknowin g theday-to-day variability of the wind-wave relationship and better estimates of the vo lume fraction. The paper is exploratory. Therefore, it is perhaps worth pla yingadvocatus diaboli and speculate whythe bubble clouds maynot be important, at leas t incurrent satellite ocean color retrieval practice. Here are some reasons: (1) The high wind and clouds are correlated. This masks (bias) the effect of bubbles as observed from the satel lites; (2) Both whitecaps (Wu, 1988b; GordonandWang,1994; Frouinetal.,1996) andbubble cloudsarecorrelated viatheir dependence on wind speed. Therefore, our results, as well as the hypothesis of Frouin et al. (1996), indicate thatreﬂectance of foamhastobeconsidere d together withthereﬂectance due tobubbleclouds. Ontheotherhand,therearecasesinwhichs trongwindisnotcorrelatedwith clouds. For example, the cross equatorial ﬂow during the sum mer monsoon in the southern Indian Ocean isstrong but the ITCZposition is inthe norther n hemisphere. It is interesting to note that stabilized, coated microbubb les are hypothesized to be corre- lated to phytoplankton and CDOM concentrations; we need par ameterization of this process. The optical properties of the ﬁrst several meters below the s urface are difﬁcult to measure and are often removed from data due to experimental problems such as ship shadow or wave activity. Thisis the region where more detailed studies are needed. Acknowledgements P. J. Flatau was supported in part by the Ofﬁce of Naval Resear ch Young Investigator Pro- gram and NASASIMBIOSprogram. M.Flatau acknowledges NOAA/ UCARGlobal Climate Change Fellowship and J. R. V. Zaneveld acknowledges suppor t of the Environmental Optics program of the Ofﬁce of Naval Research and the Biogeochemist ry program of NASA. C. D. 12Figure5: Thesolidlineistheremote-sensingreﬂectancefo rthe3-componentsystemcomposedof water,DOM,andparticulates(nomicrobubbles)andthedash edlineisforthe4-componentsystem (microbubbles included). Same chlorophyll concentration (0.8mg m−3) in both cases. Effective radius reﬀ= 10µm. Hydrolightrunwith62layers, maximumdepth50m,maximumb ubbledepth 8m, 35 wavenumbers between 400-700nm, sun zenith angle 50. T he grey rectangles indicate SeaWiFS (ocean colorsatellite)wavelengths. 13Figure6: Theratio ofremote-sensing reﬂectances ratio(λ) =RChl rs/RChl+b rs. Same experimentas inFig. 5. 14Mobley acknowledges support of the Environmental Optics pr ogram of the Ofﬁce of Naval Research, which also supported inpart the development of th e Hydrolight model. References Akulichev, V. and V. Bulanov, 1987: The study of sound backsc attering from micro- inhomogeneities is sea water. In Progress in underwater acoustics , Merklinger, H. M., editor xv + 839. Plenum Press, NewYork. Baldy, S., 1988: Bubbles in the close vicinity of breaking wa ves: statistical characteristics of the generation and dispersion mechanism. J. Geophys. Res. ,93(C7), 8239–8248. Bohren, C. F., 1987: Clouds in a glass of beer: simple experiments in atmospheric physics. Wiley, NewYork xv+195. TheWiley science editions. Bohren, C.F.and D.R.Huffman, 1983: Absorption and scattering of light bysmall particles . Wiley, NewYork xiv+ 530 p. Bricaud, A. and A. Morel, 1986: Light attenuation an scatter ing by phytoplanktonic cells: a theoretical modeling. Appl. Opt. ,25(4), 571–580. Bricaud, A.,A.Morel, and L.Prieur, 1981: Absorption bydis solved organic matter of the sea (yellow substance) inthe UVand visible domains. Limnol Oceanogr ,26, 43–53. Bukata,R.P.,1995: Optical properties andremotesensingofinlandandcoastal waters. CRC Press, BocaRaton, Fla.362. Farmer,D.M.andD.D.Lemon,1984: Theinﬂuenceofbubbleson ambientnoiseintheocean at high windspeeds. J. Phys. Oceanogr. ,14(11), 1762–1778. Fiedler-Ferrari, N., H. M. Nussenzveig, and W. J. Wiscombe, 1991: Theory of near-critical- angle scattering from a curved interface. Phys. Rev. A ,43(2), 1005–1038. Flatau, P. J., J. Piskozub, and J. R. V. Zaneveld, 1999: Asymp totic light ﬁeld in the presence of abubble-layer. Optics Express ,5(5), 120–124. Frouin, R., M. Schwindling, and P.-Y. Deschamps, 1996: Spec tral reﬂectance of sea foam in the visible and near-infrared: In situ measurements and r emote sensing implications. J. Geophys. Res. ,101(C6), 14361–14371. Gordon, H. R. and A. Y. Morel, 1983: Remote assessment of ocean color for interpretation of satellite visible imagery : a review . Springer-Verlag, New York 114. Lecture notes on coastal and estuarine studies ; 4. Gordon, H.R.and M.Wang, 1994: Inﬂuence of oceanic whitecap s on atmospheric correction of ocean-color sensors. Appl. Opt. ,33(33), 7754–7763. 15Isao, K., S. Hara, K. Terauchi, and K. Kogure, 1990: Role of su b-micrometre particles in the ocean.Nature,345(6272), 242–244. Johnson, B. D. and R. C. Cooke, 1979: Bubble populations and s pectra in coastal waters: a photographic approach. J. Geophys. Res. ,84(C7), 3761–3766. Johnson, B. D. and P. J. Wangersky, 1987: Microbubbles: stab ilization by monolayers of adsorbed particles. J.Geophys. Res. ,92(C13), 14641–14647. Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, et al., 1996: The NCEP/ NCAR 40-year reanalysis project.Bull. Amer.Meteorol. Soc. ,77(3), 437–471. King, M. D., L. F. Radke, and P. V. Hobbs, 1993: Optical proper ties of marine stratocumulus clouds modiﬁed by ships. J. Geophys. Res. ,98(D2), 2729–2739. Kraus,E.B.andJ.A.Businger,1994: Atmosphere-oceaninteraction . OxfordUniversityPress Clarendon Press, NewYork Oxford England xxii + 362 p. Oxford monographs on geology and geophysics ; no. 27. Medwin, H., 1977: In situ acoustic measurements of microbub bles at sea. J. Geophys. Res. , 82(6), 971–976. Medwin, H. and N.D.Breitz, 1989: Ambient and transient bubb le spectral densities in quies- cent seas and under spilling breakers. J. Geophys. Res ,94(C9), 12751–12759. Mobley, C.D.,1994: Light and water: radiative transfer innatural waters . Academic Press, SanDiego xvii + 592. Mobley, C. D., B. Gentili, H. R. Gordon, et al., 1994: Compari son of numerical models for computing underwater light ﬁelds. Appl. Opt. ,32(36), 7484–7504. Morel, A., 1988: Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relat ion to its biogenous matter content (case I waters). J. Geophys. Res. ,93(C9), 10749–10768. Mulhearn, P. J., 1981: Distribution of microbubbles in coas tal waters. J. Geophys. Res. , 86(C7), 6429–6434. O’Hern, T.J.,L.d’Agostino, and A.J. Acosta, 1988: Compari son of holographic and Coulter Counter measurements of cavitation nuclei in the ocean. Trans. ASME, J. Fluids Eng. , 110(2), 200–207. Pope, R. M. and E. S. Fry, 1997: Absorption spectrum (380–700 nm) of pure water: II. Inte- grating cavity measurements. submitted to Appl. Opt. Stephens, G. L., S.-C.Tsay, J. Stackhouse, P. W., and P. J. Fl atau, 1990: The relevance of the microphysical and radiative properties of cirrus clouds to climate and climatic feedback. J. Atmos. Sci. ,47(14), 1742–1753. 16Stramski, D., 1994: Gas microbubbles: An assessment of thei r signiﬁcance to light scattering in quiescent seas. In Ocean optics XII : 13-15 June 1994, Bergen, Norway , Jaffe, J. S., editor. SPIE, Bellingham, Wash., USA 704–710. Proceedings of SPIE–the International Society for Optical Engineering ; v. 2258. Thorpe, S. A., 1984: The effect of Langmuir circulation on th e distribution of submerged bubbles caused by breaking wind waves. J.Fluid Mech. ,14, 151–170. Thorpe, S. A., 1995: Dynamical processes of transfer at the s ea surface. Prog. Oceanogr. , 35(4), 315–352. Thorpe,S.A.,P.Bowyer,andD.K.Woolf,1992: Somefactorsa ffecting thesizedistributions of oceanic bubbles. J. Phys. Oceanogr. ,22(4), 382–389. Tyler,J.E.,1977: Lightinthesea . Dowden,HutchinsonandRoss,Stroudsburg, Pa.NewYork xiii + 384 p. Benchmark papers inoptics ; 3. Vagle,S.andD.M.Farmer,1992: Themeasurementofbubble-s ize distributions byacoustical backscatter. J.Atmos. Ocean. Technol. ,9(5), 630–644. Walsh, A. L. and P. J. Mulhearn, 1987: Photographic measurem ents of bubble populations from breaking wind waves at sea. J.Geophys. Res. ,92(C13), 14553–14565. Wu, J., 1988a: Bubbles in the near-surface ocean: a general d escription. J. Geophys. Res. , 93(C1), 587–590. Wu, J., 1988b: Variations of whitecap coverage with wind str ess and water temperature. J. Phys. Oceanogr. ,18(10), 1448–1453. Zaneveld,J.R.V.,1995: Atheoretical derivationofthedep endence oftheremotelysensedre- ﬂectanceoftheoceanontheinherent optical properties. J.Geophys. Res. ,100(C7), 13135– 13142. 17
arXiv:physics/0006061v1 [physics.ao-ph] 23 Jun 2000Monte Carlo studyofthe scattering error ofa quartz reﬂective absorption tube Jacek Piskozub Institute of OceanologyPAS Powsta´nc´owWarszawy 55 81-712Sopot, Poland piskozub@iopan.gda.pl Piotr J. Flatau Scripps Institutionof Oceanography,University ofCalifo rnia, San Diego La Jolla, CA92130-0221 pﬂatau@ucsd.edu J.V. RonaldZaneveld College of Oceanic and AtmosphericSciences, OregonState U niversity 104Ocean Admin Bldg Corvallis,OR 97331-5503 February2, 2008 In Press: JournalofAtmosphericandOceanic Technology,20 00 Abstract A Monte Carlo model wasused to study the scattering error of a n absorption meter with a divergent light beam and a limited acceptance angle of the re ceiver. Reﬂections at both ends of the tube were taken into account. Calculations of the effe ct of varying optical properties of water, as well as the receiver geometry, were performed. A weighting function showing the scattering error quantitatively as a function of angle w as introduced. Some cases of the practical interests are discussed 1 INTRODUCTION Light absorption is the essential element required for mari ne phytoplankton growth. The re- gion of the upper ocean illuminated by sunlight is responsib le for most of marine primary production. Absorption and scattering of phytoplankton co ntrol the light ﬁeld (at least for 1Case 1 waters which comprise a large majority of ocean waters ), and thus, affect the spectral reﬂectance ofthe ocean surface. Suchspectral changes prov ide information about ocean color (Gordon and Morel, 1983) Inall radiative transfer modeling ofthemarineenvironmen t theinherent optical properties (IOPs)areeither thenecessary input parameters, orinthec aseofinverse problems, theoutput of the calculations. This makes them important in marine opt ics studies. The measurement of theattenuation coefﬁcient isrelatively easy; anattenuat ion meterconsists ofacollimated light source and a collimated light detector at a known distance. T he only major problem in the attenuation measurement are photons from outside sources o r the ones reﬂected on the instru- ment scattered into the light beam, causing an underestimat ion of the attenuation coefﬁcient value. The detector has a ﬁnite aperture so that some of the fo rward scattered photons will be counted as part of the direct beam, also causing an underes timation. However, the mea- surement of the components of the attenuation, the absorpti on and scattering coefﬁcients, is inherently much more difﬁcult, and researchers have been st riving to minimize the measure- ment errors of these parameters for most of this century. The central idea behind any absorption measurement is to pro ject a beam of light through an absorbing medium. If one could measure all of the unabsorb ed light of the direct beam, as well as all of the scattered light, the only light lost woul d be the absorbed light. Thus, absorption meterstendtobearranged tocollect asmuchof th escattered light aspossible. The absorption coefﬁcient measured in any optical device has tw o major sources of error, both of which are due to the fact that natural suspensions tend to sca tter light as well as absorb it. In practice, the scattered light traverses a longer path thr ough the absorbing medium and so is more likely to be absorbed (the path length ampliﬁcation f actor). Secondly, not all of the scattered light iscollected due to thegeometry of the absor ption meter (the scattering error). One of the choices to measure in situ absorption is the cylind rical reﬂection tube. Such a tube needs to be be long enough to provide a sufﬁcient optica l path to measure the low absorption values typical for Case1 waters below 580nm. Any photon scattered forward off theinstrument axisis,atleast intheory, reﬂectedbythetu bewallsuntilitreachesthedetector. Anideal instrument of thiskind should also have areﬂector i nside of thesource endto collect thebackscattered photons. Theﬁrstworkingprototypesofsuchadeviceweredevelopedb yZaneveldandco-workers (Zaneveld and Bartz, 1984; Zaneveld et al., 1990). One of the greatest problems of making a practical reﬂective tube is the reﬂectivity coefﬁcient of the walls. A Monte Carlo study of the performance of a reﬂective tube absorption meter (Kir k, 1992) shows that the results quickly deteriorate with reﬂectivity decreasing from 100% . As it is virtually impossible to produce perfect reﬂecting walls, especially ones that woul dnot deteriorate withprolonged use of the instrument, the concept of a quartz glass tube surroun ded by air was proposed instead (Zaneveld et al., 1990). Assuming smooth surfaces of the tub e, all photons encountering the wall at an angle to the wall surface smaller than the critical angle, 41◦, must be internally reﬂected. Therefore, a clean quartz reﬂection tube should c ollect all photons scattered in the angular range between 0◦and41◦(if multiple scattering is neglected). However, the large losses of photons scattered at angles above 41◦are the main theoretical source of error for quartz tube absorption meters. The Monte Carlo calculations by Kirk (1992) were conducted f or a prototype absorption tube with an almost parallel light beam resembling the Wetla bs ac-9 absorption meter. The 2results showed that the relative error of absorption is alwa ys positive and increases linearly with the ratio of scattering to absorption. The error increa ses with decreasing wall reﬂectance and acceptance angle of the receiver. Another study by Hakvo ort and Wouts (1994) used a Lambertian light source. In this case the absorption error d ecreases with the decreasing angle of photon acceptance. However, early prototypes of HiStar, thenew Wetlabs spectrophotome- ter, has a diverging beam limited to 20◦. The receiving end of the tube is illustrated in Fig. 1. It consists of a Light Shaping Diffuser (LSD) in front of a len s. The ﬁber transmits light to a spectrometer. Such an arrangement results in a large receiv ing area which through the use of theLSDand the lens translates into the small acceptance ang le needed by thespectrometer. Inthispaperwetakeaccount ofthereﬂectionsatbothendsof thetube,thatwereneglected bypreviousstudiesofthiskind. Wealsoextendpreviousres ultsbyconsideringamorerealistic arrangement, by introducing weighting functions that quan titatively show the scattering error asafunction of angle, and byproviding calculations for som e cases of practical interest. 2 CALCULATIONSETUP TheMonte-Carlocodeusedwasadoptedfromthecodewrittent odeterminetheeffectsofself- shading on an in-water upwelling irradiance meter (Piskozu b 1994). This is a forward Monte Carloalgorithm, meaning thatthephotons aretracedinthef orwarddirection starting fromthe light source. An absorption event ends a photon’s history. T he low values of the optical depth inside theabsorption tube make this approach comparativel y efﬁcient. The absorption tube studied (called henceforth α-TUBE) is a cylindrical shell of inner radius r=0.006 m and length d=0.23 m which corresponds to the dimensions of the HiStar quartz reﬂective tube (see Fig. 1). Thickness of the quartz w all is∆r=0.002 m. Theindices of refraction used are 1.33 for water and 1.41 for quartz. The photons inside the α-TUBE are traced along their three dimensional trajectorie s. The scattering or absorption events inside the volume of the wat er sample are deﬁned by inherent optical properties of the medium: the absorption coefﬁcien t of the medium a, scattering coef- ﬁcientb,andthescattering phasefunction β(θ). Randomnumbersareusedtochoosewhether a given photon traveling from point (x,y,z) towards directi on(θ,ϕ)will reach the wall or the end of the cylinder. Otherwise, it is assumed that the photon ends its trajectory inside the liq- uidmedium, and thetype of theevent (scattering or absorpti on) isdetermined by comparing a random number to the single scattering albedo ω0value. All random number used in the code areuniformly distributed inthe open interval (0, 1). Wedeﬁnethe Cartesian coordinate system such that theaxis o f the tube isco-located with the z-axis, and the center of the source end of the tube deﬁnes the origin of the coordinate system. Therefore, θis the angle between the photon direction and the tube axis an dϕis the angle of projection of the photon direction onto the x-y plan e. In every scattering event the new direction of the photon ischosen using the relevant phas e function. The source of photons is assumed to be within a circle of the ra dius r = 1.5 mm emitting photons into acone of 25◦half-width. This represents the ﬁber head. Theangular dist ribution of photons is assumed to be Lambertian up to the 25◦. The position of the photon entering the tube itself is calculated, taking into account the dista nce from the ﬁber head to the tube entrance (0.019 m) and refraction from air towater at the mou th of thereﬂective tube. 3Figure 1: Schematic representation of the reﬂective tube ab sorption meter setup discussed in the paper Such an α-TUBE,deﬁned above, is similar to the prototype WETLabs HiS tar, but it does notpreciselymodelthedetailedradiancestructuresurrou ndingboththesourceandthereceiver endsofthereﬂectivetube. Webelievethatthosedetailsare ofminorimportanceincomparison to neglecting the albedo of the tube ends. Therefore we intro duced the albedo of the source end for photons returning to it from inside the tube, for whic h we estimated the albedo as 0.3 (0.2 being the diffuse albedo and 0.1 the specular albedo). T his is a rough assumption of the combined effects of the input window and the silver colored m etal surface around the ﬁber head. Thequartz wallsare treated as ideally smooth, reﬂecting an d refracting photons according to geometrical optics. Thedirection of a refracted photon i s determined in the code by Snell’s law and probability of reﬂection and refraction by Fresnel’ s law. However, no polarization effects are included. The photons are also followed inside t he quartz, which is assumed to be non-absorbing. Allphotons leaving theouter surface ofthe quartz tubearetreatedaslost. The tube isassumed to besurrounded byan ideally black medium. The receiver end of the tube is treated as a smooth surface reﬂ ecting 8% of the incident photons. This corresponds to the angular average of reﬂecti on for the glass window and the Light Shaping Diffuser (LSD)used. It is assumed that aphoto n hitting the diffuser plate at an angleθreachesthereceiverwithaprobabilityproportional tothe angulardiffusiondistribution (orscattering angleproﬁle) oftheLSD.TheLightShapingDi ffuserusedintheinstrument isa PhysicalOpticsCorporation 20◦LSD.Also,weuseinthecalculationstwootherdiffusers: 60◦ LSDand 95◦LSDs. The angles are half-widths of the angular diffusion fu nction. This means that, for example, a 60◦LSD has a 50% transmission efﬁciency at angle 30◦. The angular diffusion distribution used was determined by the least-sq uare ﬁts of the experimental curves provided by the producer. The 20◦LSD was approximated by two Gaussian functions (with all angles in degrees): L20(θ) =Aexp/bracketleftBigg −0.5/parenleftbiggθ B/parenrightbigg2/bracketrightBigg + (1−A)/bracketleftBigg −0.5/parenleftbiggθ C/parenrightbigg2/bracketrightBigg (1) where A= 0.85,B= 8.0◦,C= 15.3◦. The60◦LSDwasapproximated byasingle Gaussian 4Figure2: LightdiffusingcharacterisiticsoftheLightSha pingDiffusersforthreedifferenttypesof diffusers. function: L60(θ) =Aexp/bracketleftBigg −0.5/parenleftbiggθ B/parenrightbigg2/bracketrightBigg (2) where A= 1.0andB= 24.5◦. Finally, the 95◦LSD was approximated by a Gompertz function (Gompertz, 1825): L95(θ) =Aexp/bracketleftbigg −exp/parenleftbigg −/parenleftbiggθ−θ0 B/parenrightbigg/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg (3) where A= 1.0,B= 7.33◦andθ0= 50.75. TheshapesofthethreeLSDdiffusionangleproﬁlesareprese ntedinFigure2. Thestandard Petzold scattering phase function for open turbid waters wa s used (Petzold 1972) except for the calculations of the effect of the phase function shape on the measurement error where Henyey-Greenstein phase functions (Henyey and Greenstein , 1941) were used. Each Monte Carlo calculation was performed twice: one to det ermine how many photons are recorded if there is no absorption and scattering ( P0) and the other for the IOPs (absorp- tion, scattering and phase function) of the aquatic medium b eing studied (P). We deﬁne the 5measured absorption am as Kirk(1992): am= (1/d)ln(P0/P) (4) whered isthe length of the cylinder. It must be noted that the ﬁrst program run corresponds to cali bration of the instrument in “ideal water,” not in air. We use the water index of refractio n for this medium so as not to inﬂuence the new photon direction in refraction events. The refore, the results are different from what one would obtain if the tube was ﬁlled with air. Such a non-scattering and non- absorbing liquid medium does not exist. However, it is the mo st obvious reference value to use in the calculations aimed at studying the calibration of the instrument, because it does not introduce any photon losses due to scattering (b=0) and d oes not change the behavior of photons on the quartz-liquid border. 3 RESULTS 3.1 SEMI-ANALYTICALCONSIDERATIONS In this section we present qualitative arguments related to the optical phenomena inﬂuencing thefateofphotonsintheabsorption tube. Thepurposeofthi sistoprovideapproximate results that can be compared with exact Monte Carlo results later. Th e semi- analytic results give a better understanding of the underlying physics. If, for exa mple, the IOPs of the studied water sample are assumed to be: b=0.8 m−1, a=0.2 m−1, and the Petzold San Diego Harbor (turbid water) phase function, one can expect that 4.5% ( exp(−ad)) of all photons will be absorbed and 16.8% ( exp(−bd)) will be scattered inthe water volume inside the quartz tube . The phase function used, determines that 92.9% of all scatte ring events take place in the 0-41◦range. Assuming for simplicity, that before scattering, al l photons traveled parallel to the tube axis, all those scattered photons will be reﬂected b ack into the tube on all encounters with the tube wall. Similarly, all photons backscattered in to the range of 139-180◦stay in the tube on their wayback tothe source end. These represent 0.3% of all photons. Theremaining 6.8% of all scattered photons are scattered into the range 41 -139◦. These photons have alarge probability of leaving the tube on the ﬁrst encounter with th e wall. The angles to the z-axis at which those photons travel make it virtually certain that they will leave the tube before reaching either end, unless they are scattered close to 41◦. For example at θ= 45◦, a photon scattered in the very center of the tube will hit the wall 9 tim es before reaching the end of the tube making the probability of not leaving it <10−8. The 6.8% of scattered photons that are lost translates into 1.1% of all traced photons being lost th rough the walls. After the absorption and scattering losses are taken into ac count, 94.3% of all traced pho- tons reach the receiver end of the tube. Thus, the assumption of 8% specular albedo of the receiver end of the tube means that 7.5% of all traced photons are reﬂected from the receiver end of the tube. Absorption and scattering losses result in o nly 7.1% of all initial photons coming back to the source end after being reﬂected. The backs cattered photons, which are attenuated in a pathlength approximately equal to the tube l ength, increase this number to 7.2%. 6Another important aspect of aquartz absorption tube isthel ength of thepath that thepho- tonstravel inquartz insteadofwater. Anydistance travele d inquartzdecreases theattenuation due to the negligible absorption coefﬁcient in the visible r ange of the spectrum (Kirk 1992). This decreases the measured absorption values because the r eceiver is reached by more pho- tons due to the shorter path through the absorbing medium. In the studied tube geometry, the ratioof tube diameter towall thickness isonly 6:1, andcons idering that everytimethephoton goes across the water volume it needs to cross the wall twice ( out and back into the tube) it would seem that this effect must be overwhelming. However, d ue to Snell’s law and the nar- rowangles between thedirection of most photons and the wall , theaverage path of photons in quartz ismuch smaller. 3.2 SANITYCHECKS OF THEMONTE CARLO RESULTS Even if rough approximations of the results are possible wit h simple arithmetic calculations, Monte Carlo modeling includes all optical phenomena taking place inside the tube. This can be illustrated by comparing the approximate values from the previous section to the results of a Monte Carlo run using 40 million photons with the same IOPs. The number of photons lost through the walls is 1.74% (estimated above as 1.1%). The dis crepancy can be explained by the divergence of the input beam: photons entering the tube a t an angle may leave it through the walls, even if scattered from its original direction at l ess than the angle of total internal reﬂection, resulting in higher scattering losses. The Monte Carlo derived absorption losses percentage is 4.0 9% (semi-analytically esti- mated as 4.5%). The reason for this is that the path length of t he photons is in quartz instead of in water. The Monte Carlo code makes it possible, by tracin g each photon individually, to calculate the average path traveled by the photons in wate r to be 21.15 cm and in quartz: 2.83cm. This means that the path in water is 8% shorter than th e length of the reﬂective tube, a value much higher than that calculated by Kirk (1992) for a p arallel beam in which only the scattered photons encounter the walls. The losses by absorp tion on the front end of the tube are 4.84% of all photons (estimated as 5.0%). The small diffe rence is the net result of smaller absorption losses and greater scattering losses. The effect of the shortened optical path, described above, i s not very grave if the way the instrument iscalibrated is taken into account. All calibra tion techniques involve acomparison of the received signal (that is the number of photons reachin g the receiver) for the measured sample with pure water or air values. Using pure water almost completely removes the error due to non-scattered photons traveling partly inside the wa ll, as the effect will be identical for water of any IOPs. Calibrating the instrument in air leaves s ome error due to path length in quartz because air has a different index of refraction makin g the path length in quartz shorter. There is, however, a much bigger source of error in calibrati ng the instrument without water, whichistheremovaloftotalinternalreﬂectiononthequart zwallbysurrounding bothitssides bythe same medium. 3.3 VARIATIONINTHESCATTERING-ABSORPTIONRATIO It was shown by Kirk (1992) that for a reﬂective tube absorpti on meter propagating an almost parallel beam, that the ratio of the measured to the true valu e of the absorption coefﬁcient 7am/aincreases linearly with b/aat a rate depending on the phase function used. We decided totest whether such arelationship will hold for the relativ ely divergent light beam andlimited acceptance angle of the α-TUBE. Figure 3 shows that this is indeed the case for all stud ied angles of acceptance (depending ontheLSDtypeused). Thesl ope coefﬁcients wof thelinear ﬁt am=a+wb (5) are0.194for 20◦LSD,0.139for 60◦LSD,and0.0957for 95◦LSD.Theseresultssuggest that the scattering losses of the instrument increase with the de creasing angle of acceptance of the receiver. It must be noted that the values of the coefﬁcient w depend on the scattering phase function used. Figure3showsthatthereisasmalloffsetinEquation5. Itsg eneralversion am=a+wb+o (where oisthe offset) can betransformed to a=am−wc−o 1−w(6) which, for a given phase function and absorbing tube geometr y, allows for determining the true a value if attenuation c is measured independently. The parameters w and o may be calculated for the given absorption meter geometry if the ph ase function is known at least approximately. The values of the coefﬁcient w, for the physi cally important range of Henyey- Greenstein asymmetry parameter gand the 20◦LSDreceiver are shown inFigure 4. 3.4 VARIATIONINTHESCATTERING PHASE FUNCTION The measurement error in absorption depends on the scatteri ng phase function of the aquatic medium (Kirk, 1992). To study the effect of the scattering ph ase function on absorption mea- sured by the given instrument setup with 20◦LSD, we performed a sequence of Monte Carlo calculations fortheHenyey-Greenstein phasefunction(He nyeyandGreenstein1941)byvary- ing theasymmetry parameter g β(θ) =1−g2 (1 +g2−2gcosθ)3/2(7) where g is a parameter determining the shape of the phase func tion. In this paper we assume range of gfrom g= 0(isotropic scattering) to g= 1(forward scattering). The results in Fig. 5 show am/aas a function of the asymmetry parameter. They were obtained by running the code for the studied tube equipped wi th three different LSD plates (20◦,60◦, and95◦). As expected, for g approaching 1 the am/aratio is close to 1 as all photons arescattered almost inthedirection that theywere headed before thescattering. Fora more realistic range of g values between 0.8 and 0.9 (Mobley, 1994) the measured absorption increases when g decreases due to the greater scattering los ses of the photons. The value of am/a < 1forg= 0.95and95◦LSD is not a statistical error, but the effect of the slightly longerpathofscatteredphotonsinthequartz,incompariso ntothenon-scattering”idealwater” which results indecrease of absorption. For small g values the am/avalues (Fig. 5) approach the maximum (a+b)/a at which all thescatteredphotonsarelostandthemeasuredvalueofabso rptionequalsthetotalattenuation. 8Figure 3: Ratio of the measured to the true absorption coefﬁc ientam/aas a function of the scattering-absorption ratio b/aanda= 0.2m−1, Petzold ”turbid” phase function for three dif- ferent LightShapingDiffusersin frontofthereceiverlens . 9Figure 4: The slopecoefﬁcient w as a function of Henyey-Gree nstein asymmetry factor g for the 20◦LSD receivergeometry. 10Figure5: Ratioofthemeasuredtothetrueabsorptioncoefﬁc ientam/aasafunctionoftheHenyey- Greenstein scattering phase function asymmetry parameter g;a= 0.2m−1,b= 0.8m−1, Petzold turbidphasefunction,forthreedifferentLightShapingDi ffusersinfrontofthereceiverlens. Solid linesarethird orderpolynomialﬁt. 11Figure6: Ratioofthemeasured tothetrueabsorptioncoefﬁc ientam/aasafunctionoftheaccep- tanceangleofthereceiver, a= 0.2m−1,b= 0.8m−1, Petzold turbidphasefunction. Inthecasestudied (a+b)/a =5. However,evenfor anisotropi c scattering phasefunction (g=0) thevalue of the scattering error does not reach this maximum value because some photons are scattered at angles small enough to be recorded by the receiv er. Again, the ﬁgure shows that increasingtheangleofacceptanceofthereceiverdecrease stheabsorptionerrorforallrealistic phase functions. 3.5 VARIATIONINTHEACCEPTANCE ANGLE Resultspresented byKirk(1992) for areﬂectivetube absorp tion meter withanalmost parallel beam show a rapidly increasing value of am/awith the acceptance angle decreasing below 90◦. On the other hand, Hakvoort and Wouts (1994) suggest that fo r the reﬂective tube with Lambertian light source and metallic reﬂective walls, the m easurement error increases with the acceptance angle of the receiver. The Monte Carlo code wa s run for several values of the receiver angle of acceptance to test if the similiar situati on arises for the α-TUBE. No Light Shaping Diffuser wasused in this case. Theresults are prese nted in Figure 6. Itcanbeseenthatforlargeacceptanceangles( >40◦)theam/avalueshaveasimilarshape 12tothatofaparallelbeamcase. However,foracceptanceangl esinthe 0−40◦rangeaminimum can be observed, instead of a high peak as in the case of a paral lel beam. The reason for that is that the source beam is more divergent than the angle of acc eptance. For small acceptance angles the receiver accepts some scattered photons that wou ld not be accepted if they reached the receiver without a scattering event. This is because the ir angle of incidence is reduced by the scattering event. This reduces the scattering error of t he absorption measurement. Unlike the Lambertian source case, there is no major increase of am/avalues for large acceptance angles (although a small increase above 120◦may be discerned). It should be noted that the LSDplateusedintheinstrumentcorresponds roughlytoanac ceptanceangleof 20◦. Although this angle is close to a local minimum of am/a, it is still within the range of the highest levels of absorption error. 3.6 ANGULAR FUNCTION OF PHOTON LOSS PROBABIL- ITYW(θ) Fullunderstanding ofthemechanism ofscattering lossisno tpossible without determining the angular relationship ofthescattering error ofthereﬂecti vetubeabsorption meter. Thefraction of scattered light lost because of the absorption after bein g scattered at a given angle can be deﬁned as a loss function W(θ). The angular integral of this function multiplied by the pha se function is the error of the measured absorption value ε=am−a ε=/integraldisplayπ 0W(θ)β(θ)sin(θ)dθ (8) The advantage of the W function is that it is not dependent on t he shape of the phase function but only on the tube geometry. This is true only if mu ltiple scattering is neglected because a second scattering event inﬂuences the fate of a pho ton already scattered. In order to differentiate among the possible sources of the scatteri ng loss error of the absorption value wedecided to calculate three variants of the W function (a) W0(θ)for scattering losses due to photons lost through the tube walls, (b) W1(θ)same as W0(θ)and for scattering losses due to additional photons absorbed bythesource (”front”) endof t hetube, (c) W2(θ)sameas W1(θ) and for scattering losses due to additional photons lost on t heLSD. By”additional photons” wemean that only the difference bet ween the number of photons lost by the absorption and scattering and the ”ideal” water i s taken into account. In each of the three cases the actual value of W for angle range is deri ved by dividing the number of photonsscatteredintotheangularsectorandsubsequently lostbythesumofthesephotonsplus the number of photons scattered into the same sector which ar e subsequently recorded by the receiver. Fig. 7presentstheWfunctionscalculatedbyrunn ingthecodefor40millionphotons witha= 0.2m−1,b= 0.8m−1, Petzold turbid phase function, and 20◦LSD. In this case the number of multiple scattered photons is 7% of all which are sc attered. That means that the inﬂuence of the phase function shape on the W function isof se condary importance. All three functions have the sigmoid shape for the forward scattered p hotons between 0−90◦. There is no sharp step at 41◦and139◦because the divergence of the beam causes some photons to travel atanangletothetubeaxisbefore scattering whichal lowsphotons toescapethrough the wall even if scattered at an angle smaller than the total inte rnal reﬂection angle. On the other hand, a photon scattered at more than 41◦back towards the axis may survive the encounter 13with the wall without being refracted out of the tube. The sym metrical shape of W0is caused by the fact that losses on the ”front” end are not taken into ac count. A photon backscattered at angle 180−φhas the same chance of being lost through the walls as the one s cattered at φ. Thesymmetryisbroken onlybytheassumed diffusive albedo ofthelight source endofthe tube because some photons leave the tube by the wall after bei ng diffused on its source end. Adding the photon losses on the light source end of the tube (f unction W1) changes the symmetry. Most of the backscattered photons are lost in this way as well as some of the forward scattered. The latter is caused by two reasons. Some forward-scattered photons are reﬂected by the receiver end of the tube back towards the sour ce end. However, it is even more important that some of the forward scattered photons ar e absorbed on the ”front” end becausetheywerescatteredaftertheywerereﬂectedonther eceiverend. Thereversedirection of those photons before scattering complicates the W(θ)function, but we decided to include these scattering events in the statistics used to calculate the functions because they contribute tothe total scattering losses. Receiver end losses are caused by more photons missing the re ceiver due to reaching it at a wider angle after a scattering event. This changes the pict ure by, paradoxically, decreasing the photon losses for photons that were scattered in the forw ard direction (function W2). This means that scattering a photon by a small angle increases its probability of being accepted by the receiver compared to the average of non-scattered photo ns. This is caused again by the source beam being wider than the acceptance angle of the rece iver. The discrepancy between W1andW2, especially at scattering angles close to 0, is also partly c aused by the inclusion of photons scattered on their way back to the source end of the tu be. One of its consequences is that the population of photons scattered at close to0degree isdifferent from thepopulation of non-scattered photons. TheshapeoftheWfunctions forangles greater than 90◦isnotimportant forthescattering errorestimatesbecauseonlyafractionofallthephotonsis backscattered. Forthe W2function which includes all the photon losses due to scattering, the l oss of backscattered photons is close to 100%. Therefore, the best ﬁt approximations to W0,W1andW2were calculated for therange 0−90◦only. Thethree functions wereﬁtted witha4-parameter sigm oid W(x) =y0+A (1 + exp( −(x−x0)/B))(9) where for W0we have A = 0.935, B= 2.53◦,x0= 26.72◦,y0= 0.061, forW1we have A= 0.841,B= 3.35◦,x0= 25.75◦,y0= 0.157,andfor W2wehave A= 0.901,B= 2.58◦, x0= 26.79◦,y0= 0.095. 4 CONCLUSIONS MonteCarlocalculationsofthescatteringerrorfortheHiS tarprototypeabsorptionmetershow that the different blueprint of the instrument (more diverg ent light beam and a limited angular view of the receiver) in comparison to other reﬂective tube a bsorption meters does inﬂuence the error. Due to additional scattering losses by the view li mited receiver the absorption error isgreaterforallcombinationsofmoderateopticalparamet ers. Itispossibletocorrecttheerror bycareful calibration, andtheresultspresented inthispa per fortheturbidwaterPetzoldphase 14Figure 7: The photon loss probability W(θ)as a function of the scattering angle, a= 0.2m−1, b= 0.8m−1, Petzold turbid phase function. These three functions repr esent (a) W0which deﬁnes losses of photons leaving the tube through the quartz walls, (b)W1same as W0and losses on the lightsourceendofthecylinder,(c) W2whichisthesameas W1butwithlossesonthereceiver-end. 15functionareastepinthisdirection. Independent measurem entsofattenuationmayimprovethe errorcorrection forwatersamplesofknown(atleast approx imately) phasefunctions asshown inthepaper. However,thesourceofinter-instrumental dis crepancyinabsorptionmeasurement that is more difﬁcult to correct is their different response s to phase function variability. One possible solution is to use the photon loss function W. If the phase function of the studied sea-water is known (or is possible to be estimated by compari ng it to known phase functions of similar water samples), the W function makes it possible t o calculate directly the value of thescattering error for the sample. Our calculations show that the main source of the absorption error is the view limited receiver. Therefore, we suggest that if technically possib le (it would diminish the amount of light collected by the receiver optical ﬁber) a diffuser of w ider angular characteristics should beused inthe instrument receiver setup. 5 REFERENCES Bricaud A., Babin M., Morel. A., and Claustre H., 1995: ”Vari ability in the chlorophyll- speciﬁc absorption coefﬁcients of natural phytoplankton: analysis and parameterization,” J. Geophys. Res. ,100, 13321–13332. Gompertz B., 1925: ”Onthe Nature of the Function Expressive of the Law of Human Mortal- ity,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London., 115, 513. Gordon H. R. and Morel, A. 1983: ”Remote assessment of ocean c olor for interpretation of satellite visible imagery, a review” in Lecture notes on coa stal and estuarine studies, vol. 4, Springler Verlag, New York, 114pp. Hakvoort J.H.M, Wouts R. 1994: ”Monte Carlo modelling of the light ﬁeld in reﬂective tube type absorption meter,” Proc. SPIE, 2258, Ocean Optics XII, 529–538. Henyey,L.G.,andJ.L.Greenstein, 1941: ”Diffuseradiatio n inthegalaxy,”Astrophys. J.,93, 70–83. Kirk, J.T.O, 1992: ”Monte Carlo modeling of the performance of a reﬂective tube absorption meter,”Appl. Opt., 31, 6463–6468 Mobley, C. D., 1994, Light and water: radiative transfer in n atural waters, Academic Press, SanDiego. Petzold, T.J.,1972: ”Volume scattering functions for sele cted ocean waters,” SIORef. 72-78, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Univ. of California, SanDiego. Piskozub J., 1994: ”Effects of surface waves and sea-bottom on self-shading of in-water opti- cal instruments” inOcean Optics XII, Proc. SPIE,2258, 300– 308. 16Pope R.M.,FryE.S.,1997: ”Absorption spectrum (380-700 nm ) of pure water. II. Integrating cavity measurements,” Appl. Opt., 36, 8710–8723. Zaneveld J.R.V, Bartz R, 1984: ”Beam attenuation and absorp tion meters” in Ocean Optics VII,M.A.Blizard ed., Proc. SPIE,489, 318–324. Zaneveld J.R.V, Bartz R., Kitchen J.C, 1990: ”A reﬂective tu be absorption meter,” in Ocean Optics X,R.W.Spinard ed., Proc. SPIE,1302, 124-136. 17
АНАЛИЗ СИММЕТРИЙ ГЕНЕТИЧЕСКОГО КОДА И СТЕПЕНЬ ДЕТЕРМИНАЦИИ КОДОНОВ Д.Р.Дуплий,С.А.Дуплий ∗ Харьковский национальный университет им .М.Н.Каразина пл.Свободы, 4,Харьков61077, Украина 22июня2000 г. Предлагается трехмерная модель генетического словаря в терминах введенной числовой характеристики нуклеотидов —степени детерминации ,которая отражает абсолютную разность содержания пиримидиновых и пуриновых оснований в од - ной нити ДНК .В рамках этой модели прослеживаются выраженные симметрийные закономерности и групповые свойства ,которые описаны .Предлагается использо - вать степень детерминации для анализа генетических текстов а также предсказания структур и значения различных функциональных участков ДНК . ∗ E-mail:Steven.A.Duplij@univer.kharkov.ua .Internet:http://gluon.physik.uni-kl.de/˜duplijПонимание современных концепций молекулярной генетики невозможно без дальнейшего всестороннего изучения аппарата экспрессии генов [1,2]. Весьма актуальным в этом направле - нии являются алгебраические подходы к проблеме эволюции эукариотического генетического кода[3,4], заключающиеся в применении теоретико -групповых методов [5],поиске симметрий [6, 7] и суперсимметрий [8, 9, 10], техники векторных пространств [11]. Однако внутренняя структура генетического кода и топология ДНК требуют дальнейшего исследования [12,13,14]. В работе предлагается трехмерная модель генетического словаря ,на основании разной сте - пени детерминации нуклеотидов d,которая описывается количественно .Внутри полученной модели прослеживаются выраженные симметрийные закономерности и групповые свойства . Введенная степень детерминации нуклеотида dотражает абсолютную разность содержания пиримидиновых и пуриновых оснований в наборах нуклеотидов и находится с ней в периоди - ческой зависимости .Обсуждается возможность использования этой числовой характеристики для анализа и чтения генетических текстов ,а также предсказание строения различных функ - циональных участков ДНК . 1Вырожденность кода и специфичность нуклеотидов Хорошо известно ,что генетический код имеет триплетный характер с разной степенью специ - фичности оснований [15]. Так первые два основания кодона в большей степени детерминируют образование определенной аминокислоты ,чем третье основание .Например ,любая из амино - кислот—глицин,валин,пролин,аланин и треонин —кодируется четырьмя кодонами ,и в ка- ждом случае эти четыре кодона различаются только нуклеотидами в третьей позиции .Другими словами 32кодона,то есть половина всего количества ,имеет полное вырождение по третьему основанию z.Аминокислота полностью задана первыми нуклеотидами xиyнезависимо от нуклеотида z.Для двукратно вырожденных кодонов характер аминокислоты определяется пу - ринами(z=A,G)или пиримидинами (z=C,U)находящимися в третьей позиции .Около двух третей общего количества оснований ,присутствующих в ДНК имеют примерно постоян - ный характер у всех организмов —это основания ,занимающие первое и второе положение в триплете ,изменчивость состава ДНК определяется основаниями в третьем положении [16,15]. Корреляция между количеством определенных аминокислот в белке и относительным со - держанием гуанина и цитозина в соответствующей ДНК была найдена еще до окончательного выяснения генетического словаря [12]. Увеличение содержания G+Cв ДНК различно отра - жается на составе аминокислот в белке и характеризуется следующими тремя зависимостями . Содержание одних аминокислот увеличивается при увеличении количества G+Cв ДНК,со- держание других уменьшается ,а содержание третьих остается индифферентным относительно количества цитозина и гуанина .В зависимости от содержания гуанина и цитозина дуплеты ну - клеотидов ,кодирующих аминокислоты разделяются на три класса :не включающие ни гуанин , ни цитозин ;содержащие исключительно гуанин и цитозин и промежуточные [12]. Очевидно , что присутствие в кодоне гуанина или цитозина в большой степени детерминирует образова - ние совершенно определенной аминокислоты ,в то время как наличие аденина или урацила не является высоко специфичным :например ,дуплет AA соответствует и Lys,иAsn,дуплет UU кодирует Phen иLeu,в то время как CG всегда детерминирует Arg). 2Структура матрицы дуплетов Поскольку основание в третьем положении допускает большую вариабельность для одной и той же аминокислоты ,целесообразно рассмотреть первые два основания кодонов x,yотдель- но от третьего z.При этом шестнадцать возможных дуплетов по способности детерминировать 2аминокислоту распадаются на два октета .Восемь дуплетов (более“сильных”)однозначно ко - дирующих аминокислоты независимо от третьего основания ,и восемь (“слабых”),у которых третье основание определяет значение кодона .Дуплетыxyпервого и второго октетов резко раз - личаются по составу .В первом октете Aвстечается лишь один раз ,во втором —один раз C. Причем,переход от дуплетов “сильного ”октета в дуплеты “слабого”октета можно получить следующей заменой [17] C ∗ ⇐⇒A,G ∗ ⇐⇒U, (1) которую мы будем обозначать “операция (∗)”и называть пурин -пиримидиновой инверсией . Четыре нуклеотида можно расположить по способности однозначно детерминировать ами - нокислоты в порядке убывания следующим образом [18]: Пиримидин Пурин Пиримидин Пурин C G U A очень сильная сильная слабая очень слабая(2) Эти нуклеотиды отличаются и по числу водородных связей ,которые они могут образовы - вать с комплементарными нуклеотидами антикодона :каждая из сильных букв (CиG)образует по три водородные связи ,в то время как каждая из слабых букв (UиA)образует лишь по две водородные связи [18,19]. Можно предположить ,что,чем больше водородных связей в дупле - те,тем меньшее значение имеет взаимодействие z→z /prime третьего основания с антикодоном . Для того,чтобы перейти от качественного описания структуры генетического кода (относи- тельно способности кодировать аминокислоту )к количественному ,введем числовую характе - ристику эмпирической “силы” — “ степень детерминации ”нуклеотида d.Исходя из (2)будем считать,что степень детерминации dможет принимать значения от одного до четырех соот - ветственно возрастанию этой силы .Если обозначить степень детерминации кодона верхним индексом в скобках ,то четверку оснований (2)можно представить в виде вектора -столбца V= C (4) G (3) U (2) A (1)  (3) и соответствующей вектор -строки V T =/parenleftbig C (4) G (3) U (2) A (1) /parenrightbig . (4) Операция (∗)(1)действует на вектор -столбецVследующим образом V ∗ = A (1) U (2) G (3) C (4)  (5) Рассмотрим внешнее произведение [20] вектора-столбца(3)и вектора -строки(4) M=V×V T = C (4) G (3) U (2) A (1)  /parenleftbig C (4) G (3) U (2) A (1) /parenrightbig = = C (4) C (4) C (4) G (3) C (4) U (2) C (4) A (1) G (3) C (4) G (3) G (3) G (3) U (2) G (3) A (1) U (2) C (4) U (2) G (3) U (2) U (2) U (2) A (1) A (1) C (4) A (1) G (3) A (1) U (2) A (1) A (1)  . (6) 3Отсюда видно ,чтоM(6)представляет собой матрицу дуплетов ,внутренняя структура кото - рой определяется внешним произведением векторов .Именно этот факт обуславливает высо - кую степень симметрии матрицы Mи позволяет исследовать свойства математической модели генетического словаря в терминах абстрактной теории групп . 3Свойства матрицы дуплетов и степени детерминации Будем полагать ,что в первом приближении степень детерминации кодона dявляется аддитив - ной характеристикой ,то есть степень детерминации дуплета складывается из степеней детер - минации составляющих его нуклеотидов (например ,d GA =d G +d A ).Тогда из матрицы дупле - товMможно получить соответствующую (симметрическую )матрицуDстепеней детермина - ции D= 8 7 6 5 7 6 5 4 6 5 4 3 5 4 3 2 , (7) в которой явно прослеживаются симметрийные закономерности .Отметим ,что симметрия ма - трицы(7)настолько высока ,что матрица сингулярна ,т.е.ее детерминант равен нулю detD=0, и ранг матрицы равен двум rankD=2,ее дефект также равен двум .Это является следствием того факта ,что она есть внешнее произведение (6).Примечательно ,что след матрицы равен trD=20и совпадает с суммой элементов боковой диагонали .Видно также ,что по боковой диагонали матрицы (7)и параллельно ей находятся “равносильные ”дуплеты.Операция (∗)(1) соответствует отражению матрицы степеней детерминации (7)относительно боковой диагона - ли D ∗ = 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 . (8) и,следовательно ,пурин-пиримидиновая инверсия не меняет основных свойств матрицы D,то есть имеем detD ∗ = detD=0, rankD ∗ =rankD=2иtrD ∗ =trD=20. Если расположить боковую диагональ матрицы Mгоризонтально ,то мы получаем ромби - ческую структуру дуплет ов CC = 8 GC CG =7 сильные CU GG CU = 6 A C UG GU CA =5перехо дные A G UU GA = 4 A U UA =3 слабые AA = 2(9) соответствующую ромбическому варианту генетического словаря [18, 21], в которой опреде - лена“сила”каждого дуплета в терминах его степени детерминации так ,что горизонтальные ряды состоят из равносильных дуплетов .Пурин-пиримидиновая инверсия (переход(1))соот- ветствует отражению ромбической структуры относительно диагонали .Дуплеты со степенью детерминации больше 5кодируют одну аминокислоту ,со степенью детерминации меньше 5 кодируют две аминокислоты ,значение 5—промежуточное :из этого ряда AC иGU детерми- нируют по одной аминокислоте ,аUG иCA по две.Аминокислоты ,кодируемые дуплетами с 4низкой степенью дерминации (меньше5)принадлежат к разным классам по химическому ти - пу радикалов ,кроме дуплета GA,детерминирующего Asp иGluодного химического класса . В промежуточном случае степень детерминации дуплета пропорциональна числу водородных связей.Пуриновые основания (GиA)образуют по две водородных связи ,а пиримидиновые (CиU)по три связи . 4Трехмерная матрица кодонов От матрицы дуплетов M(6)можно перейти к структуре триплетного кода следующим обра - зом.Представим ,что матрица дуплетов Mнаходится в плоскости координат xy.Умножим эту матрицу на вектор столбец V(3),лежащий на оси ,перпендикулярной плоскости xy,то есть построим тройное внешнее произведение K=V×M.Таким образом ,по аналогии с (6)мы получили трехмерную матрицу четвертого порядка ,или кубическую матрицу над множеством триплетов . Для определения степени детерминации триплетов также воспользуемся предположением об аддитивности ,как и для дуплетов (например ,d CGA =d C +d G +d A ).Тогда каждый из 64 элементов (кодонов)кубической матрицы будет иметь числовую характеристику —степень де - терминации кодона от 3до12,которую для краткости будем называть силой кодона ,а суммы степеней детерминации кодонов ,лежащих на одной грани —силой грани .Кодоны с минималь - ной силой 3—(AAA )и максимальной 12—(CCC )лежат в противоположных вершинах ку - ба,причем CCC находится в плоскости верхней грани ,аAAA—в плоскости нижней грани куба.Назовем AAA (3)-Lysминимальным полюсом ,аCCC (12)-Pro—максимальным 1 .Сумма сил по всем четырем диагоналям куба равна 30,что указывает на высокую степень симметрии матрицы.Сумма сил верхней грани куба CCC12 )−Pro CCG (11)−ProCCU (10)−ProCCA (9)−Pro CGC (11)−ArgCGG (10)−Arg CGU (9)−Arg CGA (8)−Arg CUC (10)−LeuCUG (9)−Leu CUU (8)−Leu CUA (7)−Leu CAC (9)−His CAG (8)−Gln CAU (7)−His CAA (6)−Gln(10) равна144,а нижней грани ACC (9)−Thr ACG (8)−Thr ACU (7)−Thr ACA (6)−Thr AGC (8)−SerAGG (7)−Arg AGU (6)−Ser AGA (5)−Arg AUC (7)−Ile AUG (6)−Met AUU (5)−Ile AUA (4)−Ile AAC (6)−Asn AAG (5)−Lys AAU (4)−Asn AAA (3)−Lys(11) равна96.Боковые грани (наружные плоскости кубической матрицы K)по силе различаются от - носительно диагонального сечения ,построенного через элементы CAC (9),CCA (9),ACA (6), AAC (6).Грани,имеющие общее ребро CAA—AAA CAC (9)−His CAG (8)−Gln CAU (7)−His CAA (6)−Gln GAC (8)−Asp GAG (7)−Glu GAU (6)−Asp GAA (5)−Glu UAC (7)−Tyr UAG (6)−TERM UAU (5)−Tyr UAA (4)−TERM AAC (6)−Asn AAG (5)−Lys AAU (4)−Asn AAA (3)−Lys(12) и CAA (6)−Gln CUA (7)−LeyCGA (8)−Arg CCA (9)−Pro AGC (5)−Ser GUA (6)−ValGGA (7)−Gly GCA (8)−Ala UAA (4)−TERM UAA (5)−LeuUGA (6)−TERM UCA (7)−Ser AAA (3)−Lys AUA (4)−IleAGA (5)−Arg ACA (6)−Thr (13) 1 В скобках приводится сила триплета . 5имеют силу ,равную96,а грани с общим ребром CCC—ACC CCC (12)−ProCCG (11)−ProCCU (10)−ProCCA (9)−Pro GCC (11)−AlaGCG (10)−Ala GCU (9)−Ala GCA (8)−Ala UCC (10)−SerUCG (9)−Ser UCU (8)−Ser UCA (7)−Ser ACC (9)−Thr ACG (8)−Thr ACU (7)−Thr ACA (6)−Thr(14) и CAC (9)−His CUC (10)−LeuCGC (11)−ArgCCC (12)−Pro GAC (8)−Asp GUC (9)−Val GGC (10)−GlyGCC (11)−Ala UAC (7)−Tyr UUC (8)−Phe UGC (9)−Cys UCC (10)−Ser AAC (6)−Asn AUC (7)−Ile AGC (8)−Ser ACC (9−Thr(15) имеют силу ,равную144.Следовательно ,грани имеющие общую точку AAA (3)характеризу - ются силой 96,а грани,пересекающиеся в точке максимального полюса CCC (12),имеют силу 144каждая.Это подтверждает высокую симметрию кубической матрицы K. Внутренние плоскости матрицы ,параллельные граням ,число которых шесть ,как и наруж - ных,по сумме сил разделяются на две группы :с силами 112и128.Две вертикальные плос - кости [CAU (7),CCU (10),ACU (7),AAU (4)]и[CUC (10),CUA (7),AUA (4),AUC (7)], линия пересечения которых проходит через CUU (8)—AUU (5),а также плоскость [UAC (7), UCC (10),UCA (7),UAA (4)],пересекающая две первые и имеющая с ними общую точку UUU (6)имеют силу 112каждая и находятся ближе к минимальному полюсу . Плоскости [CGC (11),CGA (8),AGA (5),AGC (8)]и[CAC (8),CCG (11),ACG (8),AAC (5)] пересекаются по следующей прямой CGG (10)—AGG (7)и имеют с плоскостью [GAC (8), GCC (11),GCA (8),GAA (5)]общую точку GGG (9).Сила каждой из них равна 128. Отметим что ,точками пересечения равносильных плоскостей являются монотонные три - нуклеотиды ,находящиеся на главной диагонали .Отсюда следует правило : Сила грани или плоскости ,параллельной грани ,d plane однозначно определяет - ся ее единственным монотонным тринуклеотидом AAA (3),UUU (6),GGG (9), CCC (12)и равна96,112,128.144соответственно . Важно,что график зависимости силы плоскости d plane от силы принадлежащего ей моно - тонного тринуклеотида d mono представляет собой прямую линию d plane = 16 3d mono + 80, (16) что является следствием высокой симметрии кубической матрицы . 5Кубическая матрица кодонов и вырожденность кода Рассмотрим особенности расположения кодонов и их значений в построенной кубической ма - трицеK.Поскольку каждому кодону ,кроме трех терминальных ,соответствует аминокислота , то можно говорить о трехмерной модели генетического словаря . Отметим следующие свойства этой модели .Гидрофобные аминокислоты Leu,Val,Phe,Ile лежат в одной плоскости CUC (10),CUA (7),AUA (4),AUC (7).Оксимоноаминокарбоно - вые кислоты серин (Ser)и треонин (Thr)находятся на наружной грани CCC (12),CCA (9), ACA (6),ACC (9).На верхней грани куба находятся четыре из шести кодонов лейцина и ар - гинина,и все кодоны этой грани содержат цитозин .Кодоны пролина занимают строку с наи - большими степенями детерминации CCC (12),CCG (11),CCU (10),CCA (9).Аминокисло - ты,кодирующиеся четырьмя кодонами ,расположены в строку ,причем моноаминокарбоновые аминокислоты лежат в одной плоскости 6GCC (11)−Ala GCG (10)−AlaGCU (9)−Ala GCA (8)−Ala GGC (10)−GlyGGG (9)−Gly GGU (8)−GlyGGA (7)−Gly GUC (9)−Val GUG (8)−Val GUU (7)−ValGUA (6)−Val GAC (8)−Asp GAG (7)−Glu GAU (6)−Asp GAA (5)−Glu(17) Последнюю строку занимают моноаминодикарбоновые аминокислоты :аспарагиновая и глу - таминовая ,обладающие гидрофильными свойствами .Уникальные кодоны AUG (6)−Met на- ходится в плоскости нижнего основания основания матрицы ,аUGG (8)−Trpлежит в одной плоскости UCC (10)−SerUCG (9)−Ser UCU (8)−Ser UCA (7)−Ser UGC (9)−Cys UGG (8)−Trp UGU (7)−Cys UGA (6)−TERM UUC (8)−Phe UUG (7)−Leu UUU (6)−Phe UUA (5)−Leu UAC (7)−Tyr UAG (6)−TERM UAU (5)−Tyr UAA (4)−TERM(18) с терминальными кодонами UAA (4),UGA (6),UAG (6),которые имеют степени детермина - ции не больше 6и находятся на равносильных боковых гранях с d=96.В общем случае можно заметить ,что,чем больше кодонов кодирует одну аминокислоту ,тем больше сила каждого из них(8-10),уникальные кодоны ,напротив ,имеют невысокие степени детерминации (4-8). Определим силу аминокислоты d AMK как среднее арифметическое сил кодонов d codon ,де- терминирующих ее d AMK =/summationtextd codon n deg , (19) гдеn deg —это ее степень вырожденности .То есть,для каждой из 20аминокислот мы получи - ли числовую характеристику d AMK ,которая показывает с какой силой детерминируется данная аминокислота .Эта зависимость и зависимость средней силы аминокислоты d AMK от числа ко - доновn deg представлены в Таблице 1. AMK d AMK n deg L ys 4 2 Asn 5 2 Ile 5 1 3 3 Glu/Met/T yr 6 2/1/ 2 Phe/Asp/ Gln 7 2/2/ 2 Val/ Thr 7 1 2 4/ 4 Leu 7 2 3 6 Cys/Trp/Ser/ His 8 2/1/6/ 2 Arg 8 1 3 6 Gly 8 1 2 4 Ala 9 1 2 4 Pro 11 4 Это позволяет анализировать различные свойства аминокислот в зависимости от введенной силы(степени детерминируемости d AMK ). 6Свойства равносильных сечений Рассмотрим геометрическое расположение в кубической матрице Kкодонов,имеющих рав - ную силу .Кодоны с одинаковой силой d codon =const лежат в плоскостях ,перпендикулярных 7главной диагонали куба AAA (3)—CCC (12).Можно показать ,что таких плоскостей (или сечений)десять(с учетом двух угловых одноэлементных ),которые представляются в виде раз - личных геометрических фигур .Сила сечения d section определяется как сила каждого из входя - щих в него кодонов d section =d codon =const,а количество элементов в сечении находятся в следующей зависимости от d section Сила сечения d section 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Число элементов в се чении 1 3 6 10 12 12 10 6 3 1 Отсюда видно ,что десять сечений распадаются на пять взаимодополнительных пар ,имею- щих одинаковую форму и количество триплетов и связанных между собой пурин -пиримидиновой инверсией и отражением .Если силу сечения дополнительной пары обозначить d ∗ section ,то из Та- блицы2следует формула d section +d ∗ section =15. (20) В простейшем случае одноэлементной пары наблюдается монотонная пурин -пиримидиновая инверсия AAA (3) ∗ ⇐⇒CCC (12).Следующая пара взаимодополнительных (в смысле форму - лы(20)) сечений состоит из плоскостей с тремя кодонами d= 4 UAA T erm AAU AsnAUA Ile ∗ ⇔d= 11 CGC ArgCCG Pro GCC Ala Отметим ,что сечение d=4не содержит “сильных”дуплетов ,а сечениеd=11не содержит “слабых”дуплетов .В остальных парах происходит смешение “слабых”и“сильных”дуплетов . Например ,пара сечений с 6элементами имеет вид d= 5 GAA Glu UAU T yrUUA Leu AAG LysAUU IleAGA Arg /arrowdblbothv∗ d= 10 CUC LeuCGG ArgCCU Pro GGC GlyGCG Ala UCC Ser 8Видно,что сечение d=4(d=5)является отображением в сечение d=11(d=10)при действии пурин -пиримидиновой инверсии G ∗ ⇐⇒U,C ∗ ⇐⇒A(1). Примечательно ,что подобные отображения и зеркальная симметрия с поворотом на угол π относительно оси yнаблюдаются во всех парах геометрически подобных сечений с одинаковым числом элементов ,что наглядно прослеживается из d=5:AAG→UAU→GAA→UUA→AGA→AUU /arrowdblbothv∗ d=10:CCU→GCG→UCC→GGC→CUC→CGG(21) Пара сечений с силами 6и9содержит в том числе и монотонные кодоны UUU иGGG, находящиеся на диагонали куба и внутри сечения d=6:UUU→AAC→UAG→GAU→CAA→GUA →UGA→ACA→AGU→AUG /arrowdblbothv∗ d=9:GGG→CCA→GCU→UCG→ACC→UGC →GUC→CAC→CUG→CGU Сечения сd=7иd=8содержат по три элемента ,лежащих внутри периметра сечения d=7:AUC→UAC→GAG→CAU→CUA→GGA →UCA→ACU→AGG→UUG→GUU→UGU /arrowdblbothv∗ d=8:CGA→GCA→UCU→ACG→AGC→UUC →GAC→CAG→CUU→GGU→UGG→GUG 7Геометрические симметрии кубической матрицы кодонов Рассмотрим сечение с силой d=4,включающее три элемента .Представим его в виде равно - стороннего треугольника в вершинах которого расположены кодоны (перечислены по часовой стрелке,начиная с нижней левой вершины ): AAU→UAA→AUA. (22) Элементы сечения имеют связность ,так как кодоны отличаются друг от друга одним осно - ванием. Далее,каждый кодон можно в свою очередь представить как равносторонний треугольник ,в вершинах которого лежат единичные нуклеотиды .Вращением ,например ,треугольника AAU вокруг оси z,препендикулярной его плоскости на углы 2 3πи 4 3πможно получить последова - тельные превращения (переходы )элементов сечения (22). Поворотом на положительный угол ,относительно направленной оси ,мы,как это общепри - нято[22], будем считать поворот ,соответствующий вращению правого винта ,то есть по ча - совой стрелке ,если смотреть вдоль оси в положительном направлении .Обозначим операцию вращения треугольника AAU на угол 2 3πкакR 1 ,аR 2 —поворот на 4 3π,поворот AAU на нулевой угол обозначим E.Можно показать ,что совокупность операций вращения E,R 1 ,R 2 вокруг оси zобразует группу .Для доказательства этого утверждения составим таблицу умно - жения(таблицу Кэли ).Согласно определению [22] совокупность ΓэлементовG 1 ,G 2 ,G 3 ...на- зывается группой ,если задан закон “умножения ”или операция ,удовлетворяющая следующим 9требованиям .Результат умножения двух элементов G a иG b называется произведением и дол - жен принадлежать группе .В нашем случае элементами группы являются повороты E,R 1 ,R 2 , а произведением —последовательное выполнение поворотов .Если поворот R 1 переводит си - стему из положения А в положение B,а поворотR 2 из положения Bв положение C,то произве - дениеR 1 R 2 переводит систему из AвC(закон умножения операций вращения ).При повороте на нулевой угол треугольник переходит сам в себя ,то естьE—операция тождественная ,пол- ностью соответствующая требованиям единичного элемента R 1 ×E=R 1 ;R 2 ×E=R 2 . Двойное выполнение поворота на 2 3πидентично повороту на 4 3π,поэтомуR 1 ×R 1 =R 2 . Аналогично находим произведения остальных элементов . G a \G b E R 1 R 2 E E R 1 R 2 R 1 R 1 R 2 R 1 R 2 R 2 E R 1 Видно,что совокупность эементов Γявляется группой ,поскольку выполняются условия : 1.Произведение любых двух элементов принадлежит совокупности . 2.Условие ассоциативности ,то есть при перемножении трех элементов не должно иметь значения в какой последовательности выполняется это умножение .Поскольку элемент группы —поворот,то это условие выполняется . 3.Единичный элемент оговорен выше ,а существование обратного вытекает из таблицы умножения .Как произведение двух операций совмещения ,так и действие обратное любой из них,естественно ,являются операциями совмещения . Таким образом мы доказали ,что сечение со степенью детерминации d=4обладает свой - ствами группы .Аналогично можно доказать групповые свойства сечения d=11,также содер - жащее три кодона CCG→CGC→GCC (23) В каждом из сечений можно найти общее число пуриновых и пиримидиновых оснований . d section n C n G n U n A n C +n U n G +n A 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 4 0 0 3 6 3 6 5 0 3 6 9 6 12 6 3 6 9 12 12 18 7 6 9 12 9 18 18 8 9 12 9 6 18 18 9 12 9 6 3 18 12 10 9 6 3 0 12 6 11 6 3 0 0 6 3 12 3 0 0 0 3 0∆ n -3 -3 -6 -6 0 0 6 6 3 3 График зависимости ∆nотdпредставляет собой периодическую функцию с областью опре - деления{3;12}и областью значений на отрезке {-6;6}.Эта функция описывает колебания раз - ности количества пиримидинов и пуринов в кодонах с одинаковыми степенями детерминации , что позволяет говорить об определенном биологическом смысле введенной нами степени де - терминации нуклеотида d. 10Отметим ,что речь идет о зависимостях внутри генетического словаря ,применимых и к одноцепочечным нуклеотидным последовательностям в отличие от Чаргаффа [23], описавше - го пурин-пиримидиновые соотношения в молекуле ДНК .Таким образом ,благодаря введенной степени детерминации нуклеотида возможно анализировать не только относительное и каче - ственное ,но и абсолютное содержание определенных нуклеотидов в любом генетическом тек - сте. 8Выводы Таким образом ,алгебраический подход дает возможность по новому взглянуть на проблему генетического кода .Симметрии ,наблюдаемые в коде проявляют себя в процессах выбора ко - донов для определения различных аминокислот .Предложенная модель построена на основе различной способности нуклеотидов C,G,U,Aоднозначно детерминировать аминокислоту . Введенное понятие степени детерминации нуклеотида позволяет представлять генетические тексты как последовательность чисел от 1до4(фактически в четверичной системе счисления ). Анализ таких последовательностей может привести к более глубокому пониманию процессов транскрипции и ,возможно ,к формулировке новых принципов конструирования рекомбинант - ных ДНК ,что в настоящее время является неотъемлимым компонентом развития методов кло - нирования и генной инженерии . Список литературы [1]Сингер М .,Берг П.Гены и геномы .-М.: Мир , 1998. -391 с. [2]Стент Г.,Кэлиндар Р .Молекулярная генетика .-М.: Мир , 1981. -646 с. [3] HornosJ.E.M.,HornosY.M.M. Modelfortheevolutionofthegeneticcode // Phys.Rev.Lett. - 1993. -V. 71.- P.4401–4404 . [4] Jarvis P. D., Bashford J. D. Systematics of the genetic code and anticode: history, supersymmetry,degeneracyandperiodicity .-Hobart:1998.- 3p.(Preprint/ Univ.ofTasmania , physics/9809030 ). [5] Frappat L., Sorba P., Sciarrino A. A crystal base for the genetic code . - Lyon: 1997. - 12p. (Preprint/ Lab. de Phys. Theor.ENS ;ENSLAPP-AL-671/97, physics/9801027 ). [6]Суходолец В .В.Смысл генетического кода :реконструкция этапа предбиологической эво - люции// Генетика . - 1985. - T. 21. -№10. - С.1589–1599 . [7] FindleyG.L.,FindleyA.M.,McGlynnS.P. Symmetrycharacteristicsofthegeneticcode // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA . - 1982. - V. 79. -№22. - P.7061–7065 . [8] BashfordJ.D.,TsohantjisI.,JarvisP.D. Asupersymmetricmodelfortheevolutionofthegenetic code// Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA . -1998. - V. 95. - P.987–992 . [9] BashfordJ.D.,TsohantjisI.,JarvisP.D. Codonandnucleotideassignmentsinasupersymmetric model of the genetic code // Phys. Lett. - 1997.-V. A233. -P.481–488 . [10] Bashford J. D., Jarvis P. D., Tsohantjis I. Supersymmetry and the genetic code // Physical ApplicationsandMathematicalAspectsofGeometry,Groups,andAlgebras .-Singapore: World Sci. , 1997. - P. 826–831 . 11[11] BhryT.,CzirykA.,VicsekT.,MajorB. ApplicationofvectorspacetechniquestoDNA // Fractals . - 1998. -V. 6.-№3.-P.205–210 . [12] Ичас М.Биологический код . -М.: Мир ,1971. -351 с. [13] Ратнер В .А.Структура и эволюция генетического кода // Итоги науки и техники .Сер. Мол.Биол. T.21. -М.: ВИНИТИ , 1985. - С.158–197 . [14] MaddoxJ. The geneticcode by numbers // Nature .- 1994.- V. 367. - P.111. [15] Льюин Б .Гены. -М.: Мир , 1987. -544 с. [16] Сингер М .,Берг П.Гены и геномы .-М.: Мир , 1998. -373 с. [17] Румер Ю .Б.О систематизации кодонов в генетическом коде // ДАН СССР .-1969.-T. 187. -№187. - С.937–938 . [18] Румер Ю .Б.Систематизация кодонов в генетическом коде // ДАН СССР .-1968.-T. 183. -№1. -С.225–226 . [19] Румер Ю .Б.О систематизации кодонов в генетическом коде // ДАН СССР .-1966.-T. 167. -№6. -С.1393–1394 . [20] Гантмахер Ф .Р.Теория матриц . -М.: Наука ,1988. -548 с. [21] Карасев В .А.Ромбический вариант генетического словаря на основе комплементарности кодирующих нуклеотидов // Вестн.Ленингр.ун-та .- 1976.- T. 1.-№3. -С.93–97. [22] Эллиот Д .,Добер П.Симметрия в физике .-М.: Мир ,1983. -364 с. [23] Бреслер С .Е.Введение в молекулярную биологию .-Л.: Наука , 1966. -296 с. 12
arXiv:physics/0006063v1 [physics.ao-ph] 25 Jun 2000Asymptoticlightﬁeldin thepresenceofa bubble-layer PiotrJ.Flatau ScrippsInstitutionofOceanography,Universityof Califo rnia,SanDiego, LaJolla,California92093-0221 pﬂatau@ucsd.edu JacekPiskozub InstituteofOceanology,PolishAcademyofSciences,81712 Sopot,Poland piskozub@iopan.gda.pl J. RonaldV. Zaneveld OregonStateUniversity, CollegeofOceanandAtmosphericS cience, Corvallis, OR97331 zaneveld@oce.orst.edu OpticsExpress,vol5,number5, August1999,page120-123 ReceivedJuly 23,1999;RevisedAugust26,1000(C)1999OSA htpp://epubs.osa.org/oearchive/pdf/11948.pdf Abstract: Wereportthatthesubmergedmicrobubblesareanefﬁcientso urce of diffuse radiance and may contribute to a rapid transition to the diffuse asymptoticregime.Inthisasymptoticregimeanaveragecos ineiseasilypre- dictableandmeasurable. c/circlecopyrt2008 Optical Society of America OCIScodes: (010.4450) Ocean optics; (290.4210) Multiple Scattering Referencesand links 1. J.R. V. Zaneveld. “An asymptotic closure theory for irrad iance in the sea and its inversion to obtain the inherent optical properties,” Limnol.Oceanogr. 34,1442–1452 (1989). 2. N. J. McCormick. “Mathematical models for the mean cosine of irradiance and the diffuse attenuation coefﬁ- cient,” Limnol.Oceanogr. 40, 1013–1018 (1995). 3. T. T. Bannister. “Model of the mean cosine of underwater ra diance and estimation of underwater scalar irradi- ance,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 37.773–780 (1992). 4. J. Berwald, D. Stramski, C. D. Mobley, and D. A. Kiefer. “In ﬂuences of absorption and scattering on vertical changesintheaveragecosineoftheunderwaterlightﬁeld,” LimnologyandOceanography 40,1347–1357(1995). 5. D.Stramski. Gasmicrobubbles:Anassessmentoftheirsig niﬁcancetolightscattering inquiescentseas. In Ocean optics XII : 13-15 June 1994, Bergen, Norway , Jules S. Jaffe, editor, Proc. SPIE v. 2258, 704–710 (Bellin gham, Wash.,USA,1994). 6. R. Frouin, M. Schwindling, and P.-Y. Deschamps. “Spectra l reﬂectance of sea foam in the visible and near- infrared: In situ measurements and remote sensing implicat ions,” J.Geophys. Res. 101,14361–14371 (1996). 7. Curtis D.Mobley. Light and water : radiative transfer in natural waters (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994). 8. P.J. Flatau, M. K. Flatau, J. R. V. Zaneveld, and C. Mobley. “Remote sensing of clouds of bubbles in seawater,” Q.J.Roy. Met. Soc. (1999)(to bepublished). 9. D. M. Farmer and D. D. Lemon. “The inﬂuence of bubbles on amb ient noise in the ocean at high wind speeds,” J.Phys.Oceanogr. 14, 1762–1778 (1984). 10. S.A.Thorpe. “Dynamical processes of transfer atthe sea surface,” Prog.Oceanogr. 35, 315–352 (1995). 11. B. D. Johnson and P. J. Wangersky. “Microbubbles: stabil ization by monolayers of adsorbed particles,” J. Geo- phys.Res. 92,14641–14647 (1987). 12. H.Medwin. “In situ acoustic measurements of microbubbl es atsea,” J.Geophys. Res. 82, 971–976, (1977). 13. K. Isao, S. Hara, K. Terauchi, and K. Kogure. “Role of sub- micrometre particles in the ocean,” Nature 345, 242–244 (1990).14. S. A. Thorpe, P. Bowyer, and D. K. Woolf. “Some factors aff ecting the size distributions of oceanic bubbles,” J. Phys.Oceanogr. 22, 382–389 (1992). 15. P.J.Mulhearn. “Distribution of microbubbles in coasta l waters,” J.Geophys. Res. 86, 6429–6434 (1981). 16. J. Piskozub. Effects of surface waves and sea bottom on se lf-shading of in-water optical instruments. In Ocean optics XII : 13-15 June 1994, Bergen, Norway , Jules S. Jaffe, editor, Proc. SPIE v. 2258, 300–308 (Bellin gham, Wash.,USA,1994). 1 Introduction Theverticalstructureoflightintheseaisimportantinmar inebio-optics.Sunlightistheenergy source for the biological food chain, and the amount and spec trum of solar energyavailable at a given depthmust be knownif accurate productivitycalcula tionsare to be made. The vertical structure of the diffuse attenuationcoefﬁcientin the near surface regimeis importantin under- standing optical remote sensing. The behavior of the light ﬁ eld in the sea is described by the equation of radiative transfer, which relates the light ﬁel d to the inherent optical properties of wateranditsconstituents[1].Oncethisequationissolved certainmomentsofthelightﬁeldcan bederivedandcomparedwithmeasurements.Ofparticularin terestistheaveragecosineofirra- dianceatdepth zwhichisdeﬁnedby ¯µ(z) =E(z)/E0(z),where E0(z)isthescalarirradiance andE(z)is the net (vector) irradiance, both with units Wm−2. The downwelling average co- sineis ¯µd(z) =Ed/E0,where Edisthedownwellingirradiance.Theaveragecosine,whichca n vary between -1 and 1, gives directionalinformationabout t he radiance distribution.The aver- agecosineisalsorelatedtothediffuseattenuationcoefﬁc ientK(z) =−1/E(z)dE(z)/dz.In- tegrationoftheradiativetransferequationoveralldirec tionsleadsto dE(z)/dz=−a(z)E0(z) so that ¯µ(z) =a(z)/K(z), which is knownas Gershun’sequation.We can now measure a(z) andK(z)routinely,sothatitispossibletoverifypredictionsofth everticaldistributionof ¯µon thebasis ofobservations.A numberofmodelsofthevertical structureoftheaveragecosineof the light ﬁeld have been presented [1-4] but they have all bee n limited to homogeneousmedia with a ﬂat surface. On the other hand, using the data from the G ulf of California and the East Coast shelf oneof us(JRVZ, unpublished)concludedthat the average cosine modelsdo not ﬁt the determinationof ¯µ(z)fromK(z)anda(z). It is speculated that this departurefrom theory is due to vertical inhomogeneities in the inherent optical p roperties (IOPs) and the possibility thatthelightﬁeldinthesurfacelayeroftheoceanmaybemor ediffusethantheoreticalmodels assume. This diffuse light ﬁeld may be due to haze and clouds i n the atmosphere, relatively lowsolarzenithangles,surfacewaves,andmicrobubblesin thesurfacelayer.Acombinationof these factors contributes to the light ﬁeld being quite diff use throughout the water column. In thisstudywe demonstratethecapacityofairbubblestobean efﬁcientscatterer. 2 Results There is limited knowledge[5-7] about the radiative transf er propertiesof bubble clouds, their inherentopticalproperties,andtheirglobalclimatology .Recently,wereported[8]ontheinﬂu- enceofsubmergedbubblecloudswithinthewaterontheremot esensingreﬂectance.Individual bubble clouds persist for several minutes and are generated by breaking waves. There is evi- dence that at high wind speeds, separate bubble clouds near t he surface coalesce, producing a stratuslayer[9,10].Themajorityofbubblesinjectedinto thesurfacelayersofnaturalwatersare unstable,eitherdissolvingduetoenhancedsurfacetensio nandhydrostaticpressuresorrisingto the air-water interface where they break [11].However,bub bleswith long residence times, i.e. stable microbubbleshave been observed [12-14]. One of the s tabilization mechanisms [15,11] assumes that the surfactant material is a natural degradati onproduct of chlorophyll,present in photosynthesizingalgae. We consider three simple situations: (1) “inﬁnitely” deep h omogeneous ocean composed of CDOM, water, and particulates; (2) “inﬁnitely” deep homo geneousocean composed of the same CDOM, water,andparticulatesbut also with bubbles;(3 )two meter layerofbubblesandFig. 1. Bubble-stratus layer generated by breaking waves. B ubble population is continually replenished by wave activity (breaking waves at the surface ) leading eventually to semi- homogeneous layer. “background”CDOM, water,andparticulates.InFig. 1the tw o-layercase ispresented.(based on[10]). The background water, CDOM, and particulates are character ized by absorption and scat- tering coefﬁcients a= 0.1801m−1andb= 1.2525m−1(thus we include water a and b). It corresponds to a chlorophyll concentration of 10mgm−3at a wavelength λ= 550nm . The particulatephasefunctionisthatofPetzoldforturbidwat er[7].Thephasefunctionforbubbles wascalculatedbyaveragingfromsizeparameter x= 10−350,where x= 2πr/λ,risradius. The size distribution follows a r−4law. A phase function was derived using the exact method for spheres and we assume a refractive index n= 3/4. The scattering coefﬁcient for bubbles is assumed to be bbubble = 0.6181m−1. In our recent paper [8] we discuss in detail the clima- tologyof bubblelayer depth,verticaldistribution,and de pendenceofdepthonthe windspeed. Assumptions made here are typical for 10m/swinds in bubble-stratus regime. The radiative transfer calculations were performed using the Monte-Carl o technique [16]. The main results of this note are presented in Figs. 2-3. Fig. 2 shows the avera ge cosine for the downwelling radiation for the three cases discussed above. In this ﬁgure “circles” are for the two-layer sys- tem. At ﬁrst there a is rapid decrease in the value of the avera ge cosine as initially collimated photonsareefﬁcientlyscattered.Afterexitingthe“bubbl e”layerthelightisalreadydiffuseand onlyasmalladjustmentisneededtoattainanasymptoticreg imeforthe“nobubbles”situation. This double-exponential transition mechanism seems to be p articularly efﬁcient in establish- ing the near-surface diffuse light ﬁeld. Clearly, the depth of the bubble layer and the inherent optical propertieswill furtherdeterminethis efﬁciency. Fig 3 shows ¯µ(z), which containscon- tribution from the upwelling radiation as well. The upwelli ng radiance ﬁeld adjusts gradually when photons interact with the “bubble” layer. There is pref erential loss of photons traveling in the horizontal direction. This leads to more collimated l ight and increased average cosine closetothesurface.Inreference[8]wediscussinmoredeta iltheclimatologyofbubbleclouds, whichstronglydependsonwindspeed.Theimportanceofbubb lesonanasymptoticlightﬁeld depends on wind speed, wind gustiness, and microphysical pr operties of bubbles. Incoming ﬁeld projects and laboratory studies should give a clearer a nswer on the inﬂuence of bubbles on marine light ﬁelds. In summary we show that the submergedm icrobubblesare an efﬁcient sourceofdiffuseradianceand,ifpresent,contributetora pidtransitiontothediffuseasymptotic regime. Acknowledgements P.J. FlatauwassupportedinpartbytheOfﬁceofNavalResear chYoungInvestigatorProgram. J. Piskozub has been supported in part by the Institute of Oce anology PAS and by Ofﬁce of NavalResearchEuropeVisitingScientistProgram(VSP).J. RonaldV.Zaneveldacknowledges supportof the EnvironmentalOptics programof the Ofﬁce of N aval Research and the Biogeo- chemistryprogramofNASA.Fig. 2. Average cosine for downwelling radiation ¯µd(z)for (1) “inﬁnitely” deep homogeneous ocean composed of CDOM, pure water, and particulates corres ponding to chl= 10mgm−3(tri- angles); (2) “inﬁnitely” deep homogeneous ocean with bubbl es (cubes); (3) two-layer system composed of background CDOM, water, and particulates and 2m layer of submerged bubbles close to the surface (circles). Fig. 3. Sameas 2but for theaverage cosine ¯µ(z).
arXiv:physics/0006064v1 [physics.ao-ph] 26 Jun 2000Improvements ofthe Discrete Dipole Approximation method Piotr J. Flatau Scripps Institutionof Oceanography,University ofCalifo rnia, San Diego, La Jolla,California 92093-0221 February2, 2008 Abstract We report improvements in complex conjugate gradient algor ithms applied to the discrete dipole approximation (DDA). It is shown that computational time is reduced by using the Bi- CGSTABversion of the CGalgorithm, withdiagonal left preco nditioning. Keywords: scattering, non-spherical particles, discrete dipole approximation. Optics Letters 1997, volume 22, number 16, 1205-1207. c/circlecopyrtOptical Society of America, 1997. Thediscrete-dipoleapproximation(DDA) isa ﬂexibletechn iquefor computingscattering and absorption by targets of arbitrary geometry. In [1] the disc rete dipole approximation (DDA) for scattering calculations is reviewed. Rather than “direct” methods for solving linear system of equationsarisinginDDA problemiterativemethodsforﬁndi ngthesolutionhaveproveneffective and efﬁcient. In thispaper weperform systematicstudyofvariousnon-sta tionaryiterative(conjugategradi- ent) methods in search for the most efﬁcient one. We document implementationof these methods inourpublicdomaincodeDDSCAT.5acode[1] Numerical aspects of the discrete dipole approximation con tinue to be of great interest. Yung [2] applied a conjugate gradient method to the in DDA approac h. Hoekstra [3] identiﬁes Yung’s scheme as the conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm proposed by Hestenes [4]. Rahola [5] discusses solutionofdensesystemsoflinearequationsinthediscret e-dipoleapproximationandchoiceofof thebest iterativemethod in this application. Draine [6] im plementeda conjugategradient method basedonworkofPetravicandKuo-Petravic. [7]Thisimpleme ntationisquiterobustandhasbeen used for many years. [1] However, Lumme and Rahola [8] applie d the quasi-minimal residual (QMR)conjugategradientalgorithmtothesystemoflineare quationsarisingintheDDAapplica- tions. They claim that the QMR method is approximately 3 time s faster in comparison to the one employed in the DDSCAT code. [1] It was this work which prompt ed us to perform the analysis reported here. 1PIM[9] is a collection of Fortran 77 routines designed to sol ve systems of linear equations on paralleland sequentialcomputersusingavarietyofiterat ivemethods. PIMcontainsimplementationsofvariousmethods: conjugat e-gradient(CG);Conjugate-Gradients for normal equations with minimization of the residual norm (CGNR); Conjugate-Gradients for normal equations with minimization of the error norm (CGNE) ; Bi-Conjugate-Gradients (Bi- CG); Conjugate-Gradients squared (CGS); the stabilised ve rsion of Bi-Conjugate-Gradients (Bi- CGSTAB);therestarted,stabilisedversionofBi-Conjugat e-Gradients(RBi-CGSTAB);therestarted, generalized minimal residual (RGMRES); the restarted, gen eralized conjugate residual (RGCR), the quasi-minimal residual with coupled two-term recurren ces (QMR); the transpose-free quasi- minimalresidual (TFQMR); and Chebyshevacceleration. The routinesallowthe useofprecondi- tioners;theusermay chooseto useleft-, right-orsymmetri c-preconditioning. The convergence rate of iterative methods depends on the coe fﬁcient matrix. Hence one may attempt to transform the linear system into one that is equiv alent(in the sense that it has the same solution)but is easier to solve. A preconditioneris a matri xMthat effects such a transformation. It ispossibletointroduceleft-and right preconditioners .[10]Thesimplestpreconditionerconsists ofjustthediagonalofthecoefﬁcient matrix. Thisisknowna sthe(point)Jacobi preconditioner. To compare these different algorithms we have used them to ﬁn d solutions to the problem of scattering by a homogeneous sphere. The scattering probl em is speciﬁed by the usual size parameter x= 2πa/λ,whereais theradius. Tables 1 and 2 presents the number of iterations and CPU time f or size parameter x= 0.1 andx= 1and for several values of refractive index. The conjugate gr adient methods are deﬁned as above. Label (L) indicates left Jacobi preconditioning. For example CGNE(L) is the conju- gate gradient method for normal equations with minimizatio n of the error norm and left Jacobi preconditioning. Similarly, (R) indicates right Jacobi pr econditioning. CPU time (sequential Sil- icon Graphics workstation) is normalized to the “best” meth od. Star indicates that the method did not converge in the maximum allowed number of iterations or that the method failed to con- verge. Fractional error 10−5was usedas thestoppingcriterion. TheDDSCAT.5a code[1]wi ththe newly implemented GPFA fast Fourier transform method was us ed. For Bi-CGSTAB and CGNE we used left and right Neumann polynomial preconditioner tr uncated after the ﬁrst term. Thus, Bi-CGSTAB(N)(L) indicates the stabilised version of Bi-Co njugate-Gradients method with left Neumannpolynomialpreconditioner. Table 1 presents results for size parameter x= 0.1and real refractive index n = 1 .33,2,3,5 as well as one case with small complex part of refractive inde xn = (5 ,0.0001)and size pa- rameter x = 0 .1. In Table 1 the CPU times are normalized to the CG(L) method, w hich was found to be the best method. For example it is 4.0 times faster in comparison with the CGNE forn = (1 .33,0). For larger values of real refractive index the CGNE is almos t an order of magnitude slower in comparison to CG. This is because more it erations are needed for the same convergence and because cost of one CG iteration is less than cost of one CGNE iteration. The QMRalgorithmisnevercompetitiveandactuallyfailstocon vergeforlargerealrefractiveindices. For small refractive index the Bi-CGSTAB algorithm is compa rable to the CG and requires less iterations. However, the cost per iteration is larger in com parison to CG which offsets the ad- vantage of lesser number of iterations. The Petravic and Kuo -Petravic [7] algorithm used by us 2for many years [6] is similar to CGNR and CGNE. However, we obs erved on occasion slightly different convergencerates dueto stabilizationofPetrav ic and Kuo-Petravicalgorithmevery 10th time step. [6] This is true for all other cases. The storage re quirements of CG, CGNE, CGNR is6×N, for BiCG it is 8×N, for CGS, Bi-CGSTAB, TFQMR it is 10×N, QMR requires 11×N. Thus, for pure real refractive index, the CG is not only the f astest method but also it requires the least amount of temporary storage. It can be see n that left preconditioning by the inverse of diagonal of the DDA matrix [1] reduces the number o f iterations needed. The added time needed for division by diagonal elements is generally n egligible in comparison to the time saved by smaller amount of iterations. It can be seen that for Bi-CGSTAB, Bi-CGSTAB(L), and Bi-CGSTAB(R) theleftJacobipreconditioningistheonlyme thodconvergingforlargerrefractive index. Restarted methods (RBi-CBSTAB and RGCR) appear to be not competitive but further study may be needed (we used the orthogonal base of 10 vectors for all restarted methods). The CG method is also competitive in cases with small absorption (see last column of Table 1). We have also calculated (not presented) results for size param eter of x= 0.1and increasing complex part of refractive index n= (1.33,0),(1.33,0.01),(1.33,0.1),(1.33,1),(1.33,2),(1.33,3). The BiCGSTAB(L), which proved to be the most robust method. Howe verthe CGS(L) is competitive and faster for n= (1.33,3). Both CGS(L) and BiCGSTAB(L) require the same amount of iter a- tion for convergence and their cost is similar. These method s are between 2.9 and 1.6 times faster in comparison to CGNR — the method used in DDSCAT code. The QMR and TFQMR which Lumme and Rahola [8] claim to be faster in comparison to CGNR a nd the DDSCAT implemen- tations do not converge on occasion and when they work they ar e only slightly better in this case. As before, left Jacobi preconditioning is almost always ben eﬁcial. The CG(L) algorithm is faster thanBiCGSTAB(L) forrefractiveindex n= (1.33,0),(1.33,0.01),(1.33,0.1). Table 2 is for size parameter x= 1. All the results are normalized to Bi-CGSTAB(L). This method is clearly superior to the CGNR method and it is 2-4.3 f aster. It can be seen that CGNR convergesslowly,and has notsatisﬁedthestoppingcriteri onin 140iterationsfor n= (3,0.0001). For this larger value of size parameter the QMR algorithm doe sn’t converge well but its smooth versionTFQMR does. However,TFQMRis slowerincomparisont oBi-CGSTAB(L) and compa- rable to CGNR. The CG(L) method for refractive index n= (1.33,0)andn= 1.33,0.01is faster than the reference scheme Bi-CGSTAB(L). It can be seen that t he Neumann polynomial precon- ditioning Bi-CGSTAB(N)(L) or Bi-CGSTAB(N)(R) does reduce the number of iterations needed for certain cases of refractive index. However the cost asso ciated with the additional calculations alwaysoffsetsthisimprovedconvergencerate. Asbefore,t heleftJacobipreconditionerissuperior torightorno-preconditionercases. CG(L)workswellforsm allrefractiveindexbutiscomparable to Bi-CGSTAB(L). The QMR algorithm fails to converge but the transpose-free quasi-minimal residual(TFQMR) algorithmconvergeswell and iscomparabl eto CGNR. TheCG methodis the- oretically valid for Hermitian positive deﬁnite matrices. The matrix arising in the DDA is not Hermitian but symmetric. Therefore, strictly speaking, th e CG method is not valid for use in the DDA. The users are advised to test the CG method when extrapol ating results presented here to differentsizeparameters, particlesizes,and refractive indexvalues. We recommend use of the stabilized version of the Bi-conjuga te gradient algorithm with left Jacobi preconditioning [Bi-CGSTAB(L)]. This algorithms r equires 67% greater storage than the 3CGNRalgorithm,butistypically2-3 timesfaster. The recent version of Discrete Dipole Approximation code DD SCAT5a developed by Draine andFlataucontainsimprovementsdocumentedinthispaper. Thecodeisavailableviaanonymous ftp from the ftp.astro.princeton.edu site or from the Light Scattering and Radiative TransferCodes Library— SCATTERLIB (http://atol.ucsd.edu/˜pflatau ). IhavebeensupportedinpartbytheOfﬁceofNavalResearchYo ungInvestigatorProgramand inpartbyDuPontCorporateEducationalAssistance. Iwould liketothankDrsM.J.WolffandA. E.Ilinwhohelpedwithcomputertests. BruceDrainechecked themanuscript. Dr. R.J.Riegertof DuPont ifacknowledgedforhiscontinuinginterestin DDSCA T developments. References [1] B. Draineand P. Flatau, J.Opt.Soc. Am.A, Opt.ImageSci. 11,1491(1994). [2] Y.Yung, Appl.Opt. 17,3707(1978). [3] A.G.Hoekstra,Ph.D.thesis,UniversityofAmsterdam,A msterdam.TheNetherlands,1994. [4] M. R. Hestenes and E. L. Stiefel, Journal of Research Nati onal Bureau of Standards 49, 435 (1952). [5] J.Rahola, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 17,78 (1996). [6] B. Draine, Astrophys.J. 333,848 (1988). [7] M.Petravicand G. Kuo-Petravic,J. Comput.Phys. 32,263 (1979). [8] K.Lummeand J.Rahola, Astrophys.J. 425,653 (1994). [9] R. D. daCunha and T.R. Hopkins,Technical Report No. TR95 -11, UniversidadeFederal do RioGrandedoSul, Av.BentoGoncalves,9500-CampusdoVale. 91509-900Porto Alegre- RS-Brasil (unpublished). [10] R. Barrett et al.,Templates for the solution of linear systems: building bloc ks for iterative methods(SIAM, Philadelphia,1994). 4Table1: CPU time(normalized)and numberofiterationsforx =0.1. Method n=(1.33,0) (2,0) (3,0) (5,0) (5,0.0001) CGNE 4.0(9) 4.9(24) 8.7(76) (540) (540) CGNE(L) 3.3(7) 4.0(19) 7.8(67) (540) (540) CGNE(R) 4.1(9) 4.9(24) 8.8(76) (540) (540) CGNE(N)(L) 3.1(4) 4.1(13) 19.3(113) (540) (540) CGNE(N)(R) 4.4(6) 7.7(25) (140) (540) (540) CGNR 4.0(9) 4.7(23) 8.0(69) (540) (540) CGNR(L) 3.3(7) 4.0(19) 5.9(50) 4.6(329) 3.5(330) CGNR(R) 4.1(9) 4.7(23) 8.0(69) (540) (540) QMR 3.7(6) 3.3(11) 3.3(19) (111) (78) QMR(L) 2.6(4) 2.8(9) 2.7(15) (75) (92) QMR(R) 3.8(6) 3.4(11) 3.4(19) (268) (540) CG 1.4(6) 1.2(11) 1.2(20) 1.2(163) 1.1(213) CG(L) 1.0(4) 1.0(9) 1.0(16) 1.0(138) 1.0(182) CG(R) 1.4(6) 1.2(11) 1.2(20) 1.1(157) 1.2(213) BiCG 2.3(6) 2.1(11) (140) (540) (540) BiCG(L) 1.6(4) 1.8(9) (140) (540) (540) BiCG(R) 2.4(6) 2.2(11) (140) (540) (540) Bi-CGSTAB 1.8(4) 1.5(7) 1.5(13) (540) (540) Bi-CGSTAB(L) 1.4(3) 1.3(6) 1.3(11) 4.0(281) 4.2(388) Bi-CGSTAB(R) 1.8(4) 1.5(7) 1.6(13) (540) (540) Bi-CGSTAB(N)(L) 1.9(2) 6.8(17) 14.9(65) (540) (540) Bi-CGSTAB(N)(R) 2.1(2) 13.1(33) 27.9(122) (540) (540) TFQMR 3.8(5) 3.4(9) 4.3(19) (540) (540) TFQMR(L) 3.1(4) 3.1(8) 4.1(18) (540) (540) TFQMR(R) 3.9(5) 3.5(9) 4.4(19) (540) (540) CGS 1.7(4) 1.5(7) 1.4(12) (540) (540) CGS(L) 1.4(3) 1.3(6) 1.2(10) (540) (540) CGS(R) 1.8(4) 1.5(7) 1.4(12) (540) (540) RGCR 4.3(2) 2.8(2) 2.5(3) (14) (14) RGCR(L) 2.0(1) 2.4(2) 2.1(2) (14) (14) RGCR(R) 4.4(2) 2.8(2) 2.7(3) (14) (14) RBi-CGSTAB (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) RBi-CGSTAB(L) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) RBi-CGSTAB(R) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) 5Table2: CPU time(normalized)andnumberofiterationsforx =1 Method n=(1.33,0) (1.33,0.01) (1.33,1) (2,0) (3,0.0001) CGNE 3.2(10) 3.2(10) 2.0(16) 4.5(33) (140) CGNE(L) 2.7(8) 2.6(8) 1.7(13) 3.8(27) (140) CGNE(R) 3.2(10) 3.2(10) 2.0(16) 4.6(33) (140) CGNE(N)(L) 2.6(5) 2.6(5) (140) (140) (140) CGNE(N)(R) 3.6(7) 3.6(7) (140) (140) (140) CGNR 3.5(11) 3.5(11) 2.0(16) 4.3(32) (140) CGNR(L) 2.7(8) 2.6(8) 1.7(13) 3.7(27) (140) CGNR(R) 3.5(11) 3.5(11) 2.0(16) 4.4(32) (140) QMR (47) (58) (25) (76) (50) QMR(L) 5.3(12) (59) (21) (71) (39) QMR(R) (52) (63) (22) (70) (37) CG 1.3(8) 1.3(8) (140) (140) (140) CG(L) 0.9(5) 0.9(5) (140) (140) (140) CG(R) 1.3(8) 1.3(8) (140) (140) (140) BiCG (140) (140) (140) (140) (140) BiCG(L) (140) (140) (140) (140) (140) BiCG(R) (140) (140) (140) (140) (140) Bi-CGSTAB 1.3(4) 1.3(4) 1.2(10) 1.2(9) 1.1(24) Bi-CGSTAB(L) 1.0(3) 1.0(3) 1.0(8) 1.0(7) 1.0(21) Bi-CGSTAB(R) 1.3(4) 1.3(4) 1.2(10) 1.3(9) 1.1(24) Bi-CGSTAB(N)(L) 1.4(2) 1.4(2) 1.5(6) 4.6(17) (140) Bi-CGSTAB(N)(R) 1.5(2) 1.5(2) 1.6(6) (140) (140) TFQMR 3.3(6) 3.3(6) 3.3(14) 3.4(13) 3.8(42) TFQMR(L) 2.8(5) 2.8(5) 3.0(13) 3.0(11) 3.7(40) TFQMR(R) 3.4(6) 3.4(6) 3.3(14) 3.4(13) 3.9(42) CGS 1.3(4) 1.3(4) 1.3(11) 1.4(10) 1.6(34) CGS(L) 1.0(3) 1.0(3) 1.2(10) 1.3(9) 1.1(23) CGS(R) 1.3(4) 1.3(4) 1.3(11) 1.4(10) 1.6(33) RGCR 3.7(2) 4.5(2) (14) 3.3(3) (14) RGCR(L) 3.2(2) 3.1(2) 6.5(6) 2.9(3) (14) RGCR(R) 3.7(2) 3.7(2) 7.4(7) 3.3(3) (14) 6
arXiv:physics/0006065v1 [physics.hist-ph] 26 Jun 2000Rhythmos, Diathige, Trope Alejandro Rivero∗ February 17, 2014 Abstract It is argued that properties of Democritus atoms parallel th ose of vol- ume forms in diﬀerential geometry. This kind of atoms has not ”size” of ﬁnite magnitude. Aristotle, in Metaphysics I, 4, 985b [1, 67A6] comments Demo critus’ char- acterization of atoms, which consists in the three words abo ve in the header of this note. His translation is, respectively, skhema, taxis, thesis . Roughly, Democritus wording could translate to structure, contact a nd direction, while Aristotle translation stands for ﬁgure, order and position . In any case, it should puzzle to commentators the absence of a property standing for ”size”. It seems than most people, starting alr eady in the antiquity, ascribes to Aristotle ”ﬁgure” this property. And from here s tarts a centuries wide debate about how can atoms be physically indivisible if they have a ﬁnite extension and, then, they are mathematically divisible. I s uggest that such ﬁnite size was not present in the original theory, and the diﬃculti es of commentators to access (or to understand) the atomists books induced them to imagine such property. The mistake comes from other notices of Aristotle about atom s. Indeed, in Generation and Corruption I 8, 326a, and in On Heaven IV, 2, 309a (see [1, 68A60]) it is claimed that the weight of an atom is proportion al to its magnitude or size. It is probable that even commentators in the Ancient Age had d iﬃculties to access a key text of this ”weight”: the letter of Archimede s to Erathostenes, popularly known as ”The Method”, whose only (partly) extant copy was found at the very end of the XIXth century. In ”The Method”, Archime des explains that some results on the volume of planar and solid ﬁgures can be obtained by assigning a weight to the inﬁnitesimal slices which compose the ﬁgure, and then adding the weights using some mechanical method, for instan ce counterweight- ing every slice via lever rule. Archimedes rejects the mathe matical validity of proofs coming from this method, but he suggest it is a good hin t to guess a result that can be then proofed using acceptable methods, su ch as Eudoxus exhaustion. Moreover, Archimedes starts his letter giving us a referenc e that no other author had preserved: that Eudoxo found the proof of the rela tionship between volume of cone and cylinder, but that Democritus was the ﬁrst one enunciating this formula, without an acceptable proof. ∗Dep. Economia, Univ Carlos III Madrid. Email: rivero@wigner.unizar.es 1This notice is so recent that it is not contained in [1], I beli eve. On other hand, [1, 68B155] gives us a later comment of Plutarch where D emocritus studies the surfaces got by slicing a cone with a plane parallel to the basis. In the quote, we are informed of that Democritus was unable to answe r one of the two alternatives there presented: either the surfaces were unequal, and the cone was then a kind of ziggurat of microscopical steps, or both su rfaces were equal, and its addition should build a cylinder instead. The point o f Democritus being unable to decide for the ﬁrst option has been interpreted by c ommentators as marking a deﬁnite diﬀerence between physical ﬁgures and mat hematical ones, the ﬁrst ones having ﬁnite size atoms, the later being contin uously divisible. This is not so clear under our interpretation. The diﬀerence between slices in the cone could be one of the po ints considered by Epicurus to claim [1, 68A43] that ”atoms can not have any ma gnitude...but there is between them certain diﬀerences of magnitude”. In a ny case, Epicu- rus comes after Platon and Aristotle1, so the confusion related to magnitude (megethos) was already present. Lastly, and jumping a bunch of centuries, we should remark th e insight of XVIIth century geometers, starting with Cavalieri group -and perhaps also Viviani and Barrow2should be named here-. On some unknown basis, they decide to call the inﬁnitesimal components of a ﬁgure ”atoms ”, and then they proceed to build the modern integral calculus as a sum of atom s. Independently of if Viviani or others got access to antiquit y work, it can be postulated that the name comes obvious if we think that eve ry geometrical object with magnitude can be divided. (Diﬀerential Geometr ic) atoms have not extension in the usual sense, so the division postulate does not apply to them. They have not got extension (size), so they are atomic. To understand the properties of Democritean atoms, it is use ful to try to solve the decomposition of a cone in slices and its addition. Every planar slice has the area of a circle, and it is to be put in a determinate ord ering. This kind of slice has not magnitude in the direction of the symmetry ax is, but still has in a ﬁnite area. But the same technique can be applied on the area , then on the resulting lines. The resulting elements will have not magni tude, but in order to be able to add them we need to preserve its ordering and spatia l orientation, as well as a weight. Thus we have the three properties claimed. Archimedes calculus, in the method, uses division into plan ar or linear slices, driven by the symmetry of the problems he is focusing. So we ha ve there explicit examples of rhythmos and diathige, both needed to make the ad dition of the slices. Ordering or diathige is also fundamental for the rig orous proof, as the convergence of volume is proofed, from Eudoxus3perhaps, by substracting two ordered series of inscribed and circumscribed (for the cone problem) ﬁnite slices, 1In [2], it is made a good case to suggest that atomism is used po litically by Epicurus, to undermine the political thesis of Platon and his school. I nvolvement of atomists could be earlier, as some biographic comments of Democritus point ou t [1, 68A14,68A2,68A16]. One wonders if this confrontation could be real and to have some i nﬂuence in the transmission of atomism, as the popular legend [1, 68A1] says. 2The interested reader can ﬁnd some speculation about them in [3], where it is pointed that Barrow actually traveled to the sites where the manuscr ipt could be, and he states to be looking for religious readings similar to the ones shared in the extant copy. 3For the area of each circle, an unrigorous exhaustion is ascr ibed to Antiphon. This sophist could share with atomists the concept of weight, see [1, 87B4 2] 2then taking the inﬁnite limit and getting the cancellation f rom the ordering in the substraction. So, do atoms have a size? By now, it should be clear that weight is related to rhythmos, unrelated to size. Most classical arguments fa ll apart under this observation. As for mathematical atoms, if they are diﬀerent of physical o nes, it can surely be said that they have not size, as we know that they are the indivisible slices reached in the limit process of integration. We can th ink of them either as the inﬁnitesimal volume form or as the ordered product of d iﬀerential one forms which build that volume form. The idea of one forms could be read into the old theory. In mode rn geometry, covectors (one forms) have not size, even inﬁnitesimal. The ”size property” is carried by the vector ﬁelds, and integration is done by actin g a form over a current. In a similar manner, I should suggest that ”size” is not a prop erty of the atom, but of the vacuum where atoms are. If they are some diﬀer ence between mathematical atoms and physical ones, it is that in the ﬁrst o nes the vacuum is exhausted by inﬁnite planes, while in the second cases som ething, perhaps related to the possibility of interaction, change or moveme nt, obstructs the possibility of completely ﬁlling the vacuum. Which could be the origin of the obstruction is still unclear to me. From a modern point of view, we known (with constructions as deform ed calculus, or tangent groupoids, to name two) that the way to get movement a nd to avoid the limit at the same time is to introduce a quanta hgiving us some control of the ﬁlling but still driving to classical results (via Erhen fest theorem or classical or semi-classical limits). Such arguments are far from the p ossibilities of the ancients. On other hand, it is clear from the variation of are as in the cone that movement, or change in length or position, can be deﬁned with out recoursing to the vacuum to cure Zeno’ objections. I could be driven to beli eve that vacuum is needed to explain change as transformation of ”molecules ” or to provide playground for interaction -in atomic theory it is sometime s done via ”idols” (eidolon), which should be a kind of photons if atoms were a ki nd of fermions-. But I could also be driven to believe on some unexpected objec tion coming from the development of the ones from Zeno. As ﬁnal remark, let me notice that perhaps the funniest coinc idence of all is a notational one, which can serve as reminder note: We modern ly use the same letter, ω, as convention for ”diﬀerential form” and for ”frequency”. References [1] Diels and W. Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker , Berlin 1934-1937, 1956 [2] B. Farrington, Science and Politics in the Ancient World , London 1946. [3] A. Rivero, Dream of a Christmas lecture , ﬁled in xxx.lanl.gov 3
arXiv:physics/0006066v1 [physics.atom-ph] 26 Jun 2000Theory of coherent photoassociation of a Bose-Einstein con densate Marijan Ko˘ strun, Matt Mackie, Robin Cˆ ot´ e, and Juha Javan ainen Department of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3046 (Dated: July 24, 2013) We study coherent photoassociation, phenomena analogous t o coherent optical transients in few- level systems, which may take place in photoassociation of a n atomic Bose-Einstein condensate but not in a nondegenerate gas. We develop a second-quantize d Hamiltonian to describe photoas- sociation, and apply the Hamiltonian both in the momentum re presentation and in the position representation (ﬁeld theory). Solution of the two-mode pro blem including only one mode each for the atomic and molecular condensates displays analogs of Ra bi oscillations and rapid adiabatic pas- sage. A classical version of the ﬁeld theory for atoms and mol ecules is used to demonstrate that, in the presence of photoassociating light, a joint-atom molec ule is unstable against growth of density ﬂuctuations. Experimental complications, including spon taneous emission and unwanted “rogue” photodissociation from a photoassociated molecule are ana lyzed. A two-color Raman scheme is studied as a method to set up an eﬀective two-mode scheme with reduced spontaneous emission losses. We discuss photoassociation rates and photoassoci ation Rabi frequencies for high-lying vi- brational states in alkalis both on the basis of molecular-s tructure calculations, and by comparing with an experiment [Wynar et al., Science 287, 1016 (2000)]. I. INTRODUCTION Laser cooling and its spin-oﬀs now routinely pro- duce gaseous samples in which thermal energies, when expressed as frequencies, are smaller than the typical linewidth of an optical dipole transition. Photoassoci- ating transitions, in which two thermal atoms combine in the presence of light to make a molecule, may there- fore exhibit linewidths every bit as narrow as the tran- sitions one encounters in nonlinear laser spectroscopy. As a result, photoassociation spectroscopy [1] has be- come the source of the most accurate molecular struc- ture data available. Bose-Einstein condensation [2] is another recent triumph in the quest toward low temper- atures in atomic physics. The connection between pho- toassociation and Bose-Einstein condensation has long been close, though somewhat incidental; photoassocia- tion spectroscopy has provided key numerical data for condensation experiments [3]. There have been early discussions of photoassociation of a condensate itself [4, 5]. However, to us, the true scope of the connection between photoassociation and condensation was only revealed by our explicit observa- tion [6] that in a thermal gas it is the same phase space density that governs both the onset of Bose-Einstein con- densation andthe eﬃciency of photoassociation. At the heart of our photoassociation work lies the qua- sicontinuum (QC) approach [6, 7]. The idea is to enclose two colliding atoms in a box, which has the eﬀect of dis- cretizing the dissociation continuum of the correspond- ing diatomic molecule. At the end of the calculations, the quantization volume is taken to inﬁnity. Aside from resolving certain mathematical diﬃculties, this method turns out to have the unexpected beneﬁt that analysis of photoassociation is reverted to analysis of few-level sys- tems, as in quantum optics or laser spectroscopy. For instance, studies of two-color photoassociation schemes may draw from decades of experience in quantum opticsand laser spectroscopy [7]. However, in its initial form our QC approach does not apply to a quantum degenerate sample. We sought to rec- tify this shortcoming by introducing a phenomenological second-quantized Hamiltonian for photoassociation [8]. This idea was developed at the same time independently by Drummond et al. [9], and mathematically closely re- lated approaches to the Feshbach resonance are also un- der active study [10, 11, 12]. Comparison with the QC approach gives the transition matrix elements to insert into our Hamiltonian. We ﬁrst considered a two-mode model that only takes into account one C.M. wave function for atoms and one for molecules, the modes containing the atomic and molecular condensates [8]. The main ﬁnding was coher- ent photoassociation analogous to coherent transients in few-level systems. For instance, the system may exhibit a form of Rabi ﬂopping between atoms and molecules. Moreover, by properly sweeping the frequency of the photoassociating laser, in a process akin to rapid adia- batic passage the atomic condensate may be turned into a molecular condensate [8]. In another development in this direction, we have argued that two-color free-bound- bound stimulated Raman adiabatic passage, STIRAP, is feasible starting from an atomic condensate [13]. We have also gone beyond the two- and three-mode approx- imations, allowing for an arbitrary position dependence of the atomic and molecular condensates, albeit in a clas- sical approximation similar to the one underlying the Gross-Pitaevskii equation [14]. It then turns out that an equilibrium with both atomic and molecular conden- sates present together with the photoassociating light is unstable. The sample tends to collapse spontaneously into clumps whose densities increase with time [14]. The primary purposes of the present paper are to document the numerous technical and physical details of our second-quantized approach to photoassociation that could not be accommodated by the letter format2 of Refs. [8], [13], and [14], and to extend our discussion in several directions that support those references. To oﬀer a comprehensive account of the ﬁeld theory version of our approach to coherent photoassociation, we have found it necessary to analyze the dipole matrix element for photoassociation in detail. This endeavor in eﬀect constitutes an alternative derivation (c.f. Ref. [7]) of our entire QC methodology. Second, we add an analysis of two-color photoassociation of a quantum-degenerate sample in a three-mode approximation that is to some extent complementary to the one in Ref. [13]. Much as expected, the two-color scheme provides a reprieve from spontaneous-emission losses from the primary pho- toassociated state. Third, we present a quantitative analysis of “rogue” photodissociation from a molecu- lar condensate to atomic modes outside the condensate. Our suggestion [8] that with increasing light intensity the unwanted photodissociation may overtake coherent condensate-condensate transitions is corroborated. We ﬁnd a minimum usable time scale proportional to the the inverse of the recoil frequency of laser cooling. Probably the most prominent qualitative ﬁnding emerging from our work is the observation that it is Bose enhancement that ultimately facilitates coherent tran- sients such as Rabi ﬂopping, adiabatic following, and STIRAP in photoassociation of a condensate [13, 15]. Throughout this paper, we continue to demonstrate how coherent optical transients come about in a condensate, and argue why they should be absent in a nondegenerate gas. There has recently been a remarkable experiment on two-color photoassociation of a condensate [16]. Accord- ingly, we include a detailed discussions on the values of experimental parameters in alkalis in general, and the pa- rameters of Ref. [16] in particular. The analysis of the actual experiment demonstrates that there is still some way to go before genuinely coherent photoassociation is reached. In Sec. II we give a walk-through of our second- quantized Hamiltonian, including a detailed discussion of the dipole moment matrix element and both the momen- tum and position representation of the Hamiltonian. The special case with only one spatial mode for both atoms and molecules is the subject of Sec. III. The classical ver- sion of the ﬁeld theory, but including all spatial modes, is the subject of Sec. IV. The numerous complications to our one color scheme that one is liable to encounter in real experiments, as well as the experimental parameter values, are the subject of Sec. V. The brief remarks in Sec. VI conclude the paper. There are also two appen- dices, A on the details of the relation of the dipole matrix element between second-quantized and quasicontinuum approaches, and B on the role of atom-atom collisions in our development.II. FIELD THEORY FOR ATOMS AND MOLECULES The task of the present section is to develop in detail the second-quantized approach governing photoassocia- tion of atoms into molecules in the prototype case of one laser color only. Simple heuristic arguments based on Refs. [6, 7] could, and did, achieve most of our aims in Ref. [8] where we dealt primarily with the momentum representation, but the ﬁeld theory of Ref. [14] calls for a few additional angles. To support them, we present here a partially new ab-initio discussion of our QC method. We take the photoassociating atoms to be in precisely one internal state, and similarly we assume that photoas- sociation leads to molecules with precisely one internal state. These assumptions could be relaxed, but then one has to follow the fate of the internal states as well. We do not go into this, but in essence assume that (i) the atoms are polarized and that (ii) the photoassociation resonance in itself selects a unique ﬁnal state for the molecule. A. Two atoms We begin with a pair of atoms, assumedly in the dis- sociation continuum of a given potential energy curve of a diatomic molecule. As the atoms interact, their rela- tive momentum need not be a constant of the motion. Nonetheless, given a ﬁnite range for atom-atom interac- tions, in free space the wave functions of the relative mo- tionφk(r) could still be characterized by the asymptotic (r→ ∞) wave vector k. On the other hand, in the spirit of the QC method [6, 7], we assume that the relative motion of the atoms is conﬁned to a ﬁnite volume V. There are two basic ques- tions in our two-atom analysis that must be considered. First, our phenomenological many-particle Hamiltonian (Ref. [8] and Eq. (12) below) is written down in terms of plane waves, yet it is more common to analyze photoas- sociation in terms of angular-momentum partial waves. How do we make the connection? Second, in our qua- sicontinuum method we resort to a ﬁnite quantization volumeV, which tends to inﬁnity only at the end of the calculations. How should we handle the ﬁnite quantiza- tion volume? We quantize the relative motion of the two atoms in a spherical box of radius Rand volume V=4 3πR3using re- ﬂecting boundary conditions. While angular momentum is still a constant of the motion, the usual eigenstates [7] of the relative motion cannot be characterized by a mo- mentum vector, even asymptotically. Nonetheless, it is evidently possible to construct orthonormal superposi- tions ¯φk(r) of the eigenstates of the spherical box that in the limit of a large box turn into the states φk(r), i.e., states that behave like plane waves at large distances. Let us ﬁrst take the inner product of a true plane wave, normalized to the volume V, with a spherically symmet- ric (real) test function f(r) with a ﬁnite range ≪R. In3 the limit k→0 we have I1= lim k→01√ V/integraldisplayR 0d3reik·rf(r)≃1√ V/integraldisplay∞ 04πr2drf(r). (1) Next we take the same inner product for the l= 0 partial wave of the plane wave eik·r, basically the spherical Bessel functionj0(kr)∝sinkr/r. We normalize this partial wave also in the spherical box, or equivalently, in the radial coordinate rwith respect to the measure 4 πr2dr. In the limit of small kwe have the integral for the inner product I2=1√ 2πR/integraldisplayR 04πr2drsinkr rf(r) ≃k√ 2πR/integraldisplay∞ 04πr2drf(r). (2) Obviously, the ratio of the two, α(k) =I1 I2=1 k/radicalbigg 2πR V, (3) is the expansion coeﬃcient of the s-wave in the plane wave, given that both the plane wave and the s-wave are normalized to the volume V. Actually, the kvalues of the spherical eigenmodes are quantized, and the smallest value isk=π/R. We therefore have to be careful with the limitk→0 when applying Eq. (3). When atom-atom interactions are taken into account, the radial eigenstates for a given angular momentum are not just spherical Bessel functions, but also reﬂect the scattering phase shifts. Henceforth we assume that only s-wave scattering needs to be considered, as is usually the case for bosons at suﬃciently low temperatures. Ob- viously, even though the partial waves have phase shifts, by tweaking the phases of the partial waves it is still pos- sible to make an asymptotic near-plane wave ¯φk(r) out of the eigenstates of the relative motion of the atoms in the sphere. The adjustment of phases has no eﬀect on the weight of the s-wave component in ¯φk(r), which may still be inferred from Eq. (3). Let us denote the wave function of the particular molecular state we are aiming for by ¯ψ(r), and make the standard (albeit crude) approximation that the relevant electronic dipole matrix element dis a constant indepen- dent of the relative coordinate rof the atoms comprising the molecule. Then the QC dipole matrix element for photoassociation and photodissociation characterizing a process in which the relative momentum of the colliding atoms is ¯hkreads simply d(k) =d/integraldisplay d3r¯ψ∗(r)¯φk(r). (4) We only consider s-wave collisions, and correspondingly set¯ψ(r) =¯ψ(r) as appropriate for a nonrotating J= 0 molecule. Of course, only the l= 0 component ofthe wave function ¯φk(r) counts. Taking into account the weight from Eq. (3), we have d(k) =d1 k/radicalbigg 2πR V/integraldisplayR 04πr2dr¯ψ∗(r)¯φ0 k(r).(5) The notation ¯φ0 k(r) stands for the radial l= 0 wave func- tion of the relative motion of the two atoms correspond- ing to the wave number k, and normalized to volume V as usual. A convenient qualitative model is provided by the lim- iting form ¯φ0 k(r) =1√ 2πRsink(r−a) r, (6) whereais thes-wave scattering length. Combination of (5) and (6) gives d(k) =d4π k√ V/integraldisplayR 0rdrsink(r−a)¯ψ∗(r).(7) The form (6) is only valid outside the range of the atom- atom interaction potential, and for small enough kso that the scattering phase shift may be written as ka. Equation (7) is therefore quantitatively reliable only if the vibrational bound-state wave function of the molecule ¯ψ(r) happens to reside outside the range of the atom- atom interactions of the photoassociating atoms. In fact, this is the case in some of the current photoassociation experiments [17, 18]. The matrix element (7) is explicitly proportional to V−1/2. In fact, the V−1/2scaling of d(k) is a generic property of our QC approach, and does not depend on the speciﬁc assumptions of Eq. (7). First, the almost- plane wave ¯φk(r) is normalized to the volume V. No matter what kind of (square integrable) structure occurs around r∼0, the plane-wave form at large distances makes the normalization constant proportional to V−1/2. Second, because of the ﬁnite range of the bounded molec- ular wave function ¯ψ(r), its normalization coeﬃcient does not depend on V. Third, thanks to the same ﬁnite range, the integral (4) eﬀectively extends only over a ﬁnite, ﬁxed volume. The net result is that the matrix element indeed is proportional to the normalization constant of ¯φk(r), ∝V−1/2. Another important property of the matrix element (7), that it tends to a constant as k→0, is also a generic feature of the physics. Namely, for small enough k, the form of the s-wave ¯φ0 k(r) indeed is sin k(r−a)/r, except within the range of atom-atom interactions. But within this range, the shape of ¯φ0 k(r) is independent of kat small enoughk. In order that the inner and the outer forms join smoothly, the amplitude of the inner wave function must be∝kfor smallk, just as is the amplitude of the outer wave function. So, for small enough k, the wave function ¯φ0 k(r) is∝kfor all of those rfor which the bound-state wave function ¯ψ(r) is eﬀectively nonzero. The matrix elements (4), (5) and (7) therefore all tend to a constant ask→0.4 In order to prepare for the comparison between pho- toassociation and photodissociation, let us assume that a laser ﬁeld with the amplitude E(t) =1 2Ee−iωt+ c.c. (8) is incident on a molecule. We denote the detuning of the light above the photodissociation threshold by δ. Given the reduced mass of the colliding atoms µ, the corre- sponding resonant wave number k0and velocity v0are such that ¯hk2 0/2µ=δandv0= ¯hk0/µ. Using the stan- dard dipole and rotating-wave approximations as well as Fermi’s golden rule, we have the photodissociation rate Γ0=2π ¯h2/integraldisplay dkD(k)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled(k)·E 2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 δ/parenleftbigg¯hk2 2µ−δ/parenrightbigg =µ2v0V π¯h2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled(k0)·E 2¯h/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 , (9) where D(k) =k2V 2π2(10) is the density of kstates, whether in a cubic or in a spherical box [7, 19]. Equation (9) is fully compatible with the development in Refs. [6] and [7], as it should. Since the dipole matrix element tends to a constant in the limitk→0, it is easy to see from (9) that the Wigner threshold law holds; namely, that lim v0→0Γ0/v0is ﬁnite, and nonzero except for an unlikely accident. As a matter of fact, our argument about the k→0 limit of the dipole matrix element was nothing but a recital of a standard argument for the Wigner threshold law. Nonetheless, it will furnish a relevant piece of the puzzle when we are to discuss atom-molecule ﬁeld theory below. To this end, we note from Eqs. (5) and (9) the equality lim v0→0Γ0 v0 =µ2 π¯h2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled·E ¯hlim k0→0√ 2πR k0/integraldisplay 4πr2dr¯ψ∗(r)¯φ0 k0(r)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 . (11) B. Many atoms in momentum representation 1. Basic Hamiltonian In Ref. [8] we introduced a phenomenological second- quantized Hamiltonian for photoassociation of bosonic atoms to (obviously) bosonic molecules, H ¯h=/summationdisplay k/bracketleftbigg¯hk2 4mb† kbk+/parenleftbigg −δ0 2+¯hk2 2m/parenrightbigg a† kak/bracketrightbigg −/summationdisplay kk′q/bracketleftbiggdkk′·Eq 4¯hb† k+k′+qakak′+ H.c./bracketrightbigg .(12)Heremstands for the mass of the atom, m= 2µ. The operatorsakandbkare boson annihilation operators for atoms and molecules in the plane wave mode k. The Hamiltonian trivially includes the kinetic energy of the atoms and molecules. Here photoassociation takes place with an absorption (as opposed to induced emission) of a photon. By momentum conservation, atoms with wave vectors kandk′plus a photon with wave vector qmust then make a molecule with wave vector k+k′+q. This explains the form of the cubic operator product; annihi- late the atoms and a photon, create the molecule. As is usual in quantum optics, we use a classical ﬁeld to represent the photons. Speciﬁcally, the positive- frequency part of the electric ﬁeld reads E+(r) =1 2/summationdisplay qEqeiq·r. (13) BothE+(r) and the coeﬃcients Eqmay in principle be slowly varying functions of time, but the leading time de- pendence of the electric ﬁeld ∝e−iωthas been absorbed into the detuning δ0in a transformation to a rotating frame. The seemingly unexpected factor1 2in the detun- ing term correspond to the fact that upon photodissoci- ation one molecule produces two atoms, both of which generally take away kinetic energy with them. The sign of the detuning is chosen in such a way that δ0>0 corre- sponds to tuning of the laser by the energy ¯ hδ0above the photodissociation threshold. A quick way to verify this is to consider the potential resonance when the (quasi) en- ergy (in the rotating frame) for a system of one molecule and zero atoms would be the same as the energy for a sys- tem with zero molecules and two atoms, much like in the Appendix A. The total energy of the atoms must equal the energy of the molecule plus ¯ hδ0, which is compatible with Eq. (12). We assume that the optical transition responsible for photoassociation is a dipole transition. In the dipole ap- proximation, the electronic photodissociation and pho- toassociation transitions in a molecule do not (cannot!) depend on the propagation direction of light, hence the dipole matrix elements dkk′do not depend on pho- ton momenta. Besides, by translational invariance, the dipole matrix elements must be functions of the diﬀer- encek−k′only. Because of the exchange symmetry of the boson operators, the matrix element dkk′may be chosen to be symmetric in the exchange of the momen- tum indices, hence, an even function of k−k′. And ﬁnally, since we consider s-wave photoassociation only, the matrix element is a function of \|k−k′\|. To pin down the matrix elements dkk′, in Ref. [8] we took the limit of a dilute thermal gas. The known QC results are recovered if one expresses the thus far unde- ﬁned coeﬃcients dkk′in terms of the matrix elements (4) as dkk′≡√ 2d/parenleftbig1 2(k−k′)/parenrightbig . (14) The√ 2 is a consequence of the Bose-Einstein statistics, and the factor1 2follows from the way that the relative5 momentum must be deﬁned to make it the conjugate of the conventional relative position. We have recently no- ticed that there is a subtlety associated with this identi- ﬁcation having to do with the the statistics of the atoms. We elaborate in Appendix A, but meanwhile continue according to Eq. (14). In sum, if one may treat the atoms and the molecules as bosons in their own right, then both the form of, and even the numerical coeﬃcients in, the photoassociation Hamiltonian are unambiguously determined by simple physical considerations. Admittedly, we do not know of any conclusive ab initio argument for the bosonic nature of atoms and molecules in photoassociation. But neither do we know of any for alkali atoms, which nonetheless seem to behave like good bosons in current BEC experi- ments. 2. Two-mode approximation We now revisit the situation that was the focus of Ref. [8]: an inﬁnite, homogeneous condensate and one plane wave of light with photon momentum ¯ hq. By con- servation of momentum, the molecules one may create by photoassociation all have the wave vector equal to q. On the other hand, as far as momentum conservation is concerned, a molecule with the wave vector qmay pho- todissociate into two atoms, neither of which has zero momentum. We will discuss such “rogue photodissocia- tion” in more detail below, Sec. VA, and so far ignore it. All told, we only retain the two modes of the model with the annihilation operators a≡a0andb≡bq. The Hamiltonian reads H ¯h=¯hq2 4mb†b−1 2δ0a†a−1 2κ(b†aa+ba†a†) ≃¯hq2 4mb†b−1 2δ0a†a−1 2κ(b†aa+ba†a†) −¯hq2 8m(2b†b+a†a) ≡ −1 2δa†a−1 2κ(b†aa+ba†a†). (15) In the “approximate” equality we have added a constant of the motion to the Hamiltonian, a step that has no eﬀect on the ensuing dynamics. The QC Rabi frequency reads κ=√ 2 2¯hE·[lim k→0d(k)] = lim v0→0/radicalBigg 2π¯h2Γ0 µ2Vv0, (16) where we have used Eq. (9). Without any loss of gen- erality, we have chosen κto be real and nonnegative. Seemingly alarmingly, the Rabi frequency still depends on the quantization volume. We will return to this point in Sec. III. At present, our aim is just to set up thesecond-quantized Hamiltonian in the two-mode approxi- mation. The task is completed by noting that δ=δ0+¯hq2 4m(17) is the detuning corrected for the photon recoil energy of the molecule. From now on we will keep track of this dis- tinction, so that δalways includes the appropriate recoil. In fact, that was already implicitly the case in Eq. (9). C. Many-atom ﬁeld theory Our phenomenological Hamiltonian (12) was written down originally in momentum representation. Neverthe- less, as in Refs. [8] and [14], it is fairly straightforward t o convert it into position representation, i.e., into a quan- tum ﬁeld theory. Let us introduce atomic and molecular ﬁelds in a quan- tization volume V.A priori , this volume does not have to be the cavity of radius R, as in Sec. II A. Often it is actually more convenient to use a cubic box with peri- odic boundary conditions. On the other hand, when one deals with two atomic ﬁelds, it is often expedient to write the integrals in the theory in terms of center-of-mass and relative coordinates. If the integral over the relative co- ordinates cuts oﬀ because the integrand tends to zero at large distances, it is immaterial what volume is used, as long as it is large enough. Thus, when convenient, in such relative-coordinate integrals we may still imagine the spherical potential well. The short of the story is that the quantization volume Vrefers to the geometry that is expedient in the particular context. We write the atomic and molecular ﬁelds in terms of plane wave states as φ(r) =1√ V/summationdisplay keik·rak, ψ (r) =1√ V/summationdisplay keik·rbk. (18) The Hamiltonian (12) may be cast as a Hamiltonian den- sity of a ﬁeld theory for these ﬁelds. Using the standard continuum limit /summationdisplay kf(k)≃V (2π)3/integraldisplay d3kf(k), (19) Eq. (13), and the properties of Fourier integrals, the part of the Hamiltonian density depending on the dipole in- teraction becomes H(r) ¯h=−E+(r) 2¯h·ψ†(r)/integraldisplay d3r′φ(r+1 2r′)d(r′)φ(r−1 2r′)+.... (20) The dipole kernel of photoassociation d(r) is given in terms of the dipole matrix element of Eq. (4) as d(r) =√ 2V (2π)3/integraldisplay d3ke−ik·rd(k). (21)6 It should be noted that our argument contains a subtle trick, which is exposed in Appendix B. To make further progress, we study the kernel using the qualitative model for the dipole matrix element (7). Some more juggling with Fourier transforms gives d(r) =√ 2dθ(a+r)(a+r)¯ψ∗(a+r)−θ(a−r)(a−r)¯ψ∗(a−r) r, (22) whereθis the Heaviside unit step function. This result is only as good as the assumptions of Eq. (7). In par- ticular, as Eq. (7) is not valid for large k, Eq. (22) isdubious at short distances. Also, as we already pointed out with Eq. (7), even for small kthe model is quantita- tively accurate only if the vibrational wave function ¯ψ(r) resides outside the range of the atom-atom interactions. In spite of these caveats, Eq. (22) gives an exceedingly plausible idea of the range ∆rof the dipole interaction kernel; ∆ris of the order of the larger of the spatial ex- tent of the vibrational state ¯ψ(r) and the absolute value of the scattering length a. The relevant length scale for the atomic ﬁeld is larger than ∆rif the energies of all of the atoms relevant for the time evolution are smaller than ∼¯h2/m(∆r)2. Hence- forth we assume this to be the case. Then we may sim- plify the ﬁeld-theory form of the integral as follows, H(r) ¯h=−E+(r) 2¯h·ψ†(r)/integraldisplay d3r′φ(r+1 2r′)d(r′)φ(r−1 2r′) +...≃ −E+(r) 2¯h·ψ†(r)φ(r)φ(r)/integraldisplay d3r′d(r′) +... =−/bracketleftbiggE+(r) 2¯h·√ 2Vlim k→0d(k)/bracketrightbigg ψ†(r)φ(r)φ(r) +... =/bracketleftBigg √ 2d·E+(r) 2¯hlim k→0√ 2πR k/integraldisplay 4πr2dr¯ψ∗(r)¯φ0 k(r)/bracketrightBigg ψ†(r)φ(r)φ(r) +... . (23) The second equality follows from the assumedly slow de- pendence of the atomic ﬁeld φ(r) on position rcompared tod(r), the third from Eq. (21) and the properties of Fourier transformations, and in the last equality we have substituted Eq. (5). Comparison with Eq. (11) then gives the contact interaction form of the photoassocia- tion dipole interaction, H(r) ¯h=−D(r)ψ†(r)φ(r)φ(r) +... , (24) with D(r) =eiarg[d·E+(r)]lim v0→0/radicalBigg 2π¯h2Γ0(r) v0µ2. (25) Here Γ 0(r) is the photodissociation rate as per the pre- vailing light intensity at position r, and the exponential records the phase of the dipole interaction term. For reference, we summarize the contact-interaction version of the Hamiltonian for photoassociation in terms of atomic and molecular ﬁelds. While at that, by adding a suitable multiple of the conserved particle number com- pletely analogously to the operation that we did in the chain of equations (15), we move the detuning term to the molecules. The result is H=/integraldisplay d3rH(r); H(r) ¯h=φ†(r)/parenleftbigg −¯h∇2 2m/parenrightbigg φ(r) +ψ†(r)/parenleftbigg −¯h∇2 4m+δ0/parenrightbigg ψ(r)−/bracketleftbig D(r)ψ†(r)φ(r)φ(r) + H.c./bracketrightbig . (26) III. COHERENCE IN TWO-MODE MODEL We consider the two-mode model, whose Hamiltonian we reproduce here from Eq. (15), H ¯h=−1 2δa†a−1 2κ(b†aa+ba†a†). This is the age-old Hamiltonian for second-harmonic gen- eration, with atoms replacing the fundamental-frequency light and molecules the second harmonic. Needless to say, the literature on the model is extensive. We will cite a few relevant examples below. Let us take the conserved particle number a†a+ 2b†b to have the value N. The Hamiltonian (15) may then be restricted to the space spanned by the states \|n∝an}b∇acket∇i}ht ≡ \|n∝an}b∇acket∇i}htM\|N−2n∝an}b∇acket∇i}htAwithn= 0,...,N/ 2 molecules and N−2n atoms, and is tridiagonal in that basis. It is easy to ﬁnd both the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian and the time evo- lution of any speciﬁed initial state numerically. We have done so using inverse iteration, and a variation of the Crank-Nicholson method. While the problem considered in Ref. [20] is diﬀerent, the numerical methods described therein work equally well here. In this way we have ﬁrstly [8, 21] found the fraction of atoms converted into molecules, given that the system starts out at time t= 0 with everything in atoms and is7 driven by a resonant laser, δ= 0. We found a nonlinear analog of Rabi ﬂopping, the system oscillating between atoms and molecules. Given that we have a quantum system where the spacing between the successive energy eigenstates is not constant, it is not a surprise that the oscillations collapse, and even revive [22]. Interesting as these features are as a matter of princi- ple, the drawback remains that Rabi oscillations of oc- cupation probabilities are generally not robust, not even in quantum optics or laser spectroscopy. We foresee lit- tle experimental utility for nonlinear Rabi oscillations. Our main message of the analysis of Rabi oscillations in Ref. [8] rather is that, for N≫1, the characteristic fre- quency scale of the system is not the QC Rabi frequency κbut Ω =√ Nκ= lim v0→0/radicalBigg 2Nπ¯h2Γ0 µ2Vv0= lim v0→0/radicalBigg 2π¯h2Γ0ρ µ2v0. (27) The√ Nis evidently a Bose enhancement factor. The im- plicit quantization volume has disappeared from the re- sult. Instead we have the density of atoms if all molecules were dissociated, ρ=N V, (28) which is a true physical parameter for the system. Bose enhancement highlights the role of statistics in our analysis. Suppose we were to deal with a nondegen- erate gas. Then the occupation probability of each QC state is much less than unity by deﬁnition, and there is no Bose enhancement. The frequency of Rabi ﬂopping between a given QC state and a bound molecular states would just be ∝κ∝V−1/2, and vanishes in the limit of large volume. It is not possible to have Rabi ﬂopping in photoassociation of an inﬁnite and homogeneous nonde- generate gas, even in principle [15]. The photoassociation rate for a pair of atoms starting in a given QC state is ∝κ2∝1/V, and also vanishes in the limit of a large volume. The saving grace [6, 7] is that, to keep the density constant, the atom number Nand at the same time the number of candidate atoms to photoassociate with any given atom tends to inﬁnity. Adding the probabilities for photoassociation due to all colliders, the total rate of photoassociation for any given atom is ∝Nκ2∝ρ. This remains a constant in the continuum limit, which leads to a ﬁnite photoassociation rate∝ρ. In contrast, in a BEC the atom number already ends up in the transition matrix element, giving the eﬀective Rabi frequency Ω =√ Nκ∝√ρ. One does not add rates ∝κ2due to diﬀerent atoms, but all the condensate atoms act as a single state that has a ﬁnite matrix element for photoassociation even in the limit of inﬁnite quantization volume. This ultimately facilitates coherence eﬀects like Rabi ﬂopping. The Hamiltonian (15) acts in a rotating frame, and there is no manifest physical signiﬁcance to its eigenval-FIG. 1: Fraction of atoms forming molecules, f, in the ground state of the atom-molecule condensate as a function of the detuning of the laser from photoassociation threshol d, δ. The long-dashed and short-dashed lines are from the two- mode quantum treatment for the respective atom numbers N= 10 and N= 100, the solid line is from the semiclassical approach embodied in the Gross-Pitaevskii equations. ues. Nonetheless, let us callthem energies, and the state with the lowest energy the ground state. Qualitatively, when the laser is tuned far below the photodissociation threshold,δ≪ −Ω, thea†aterm in the Hamiltonian be- comes costly in energy. The ground state of the Hamil- tonian should then tend to have the system mostly in molecules. Conversely, for δ≫Ω, the ground state favors atoms. We conﬁrm these surmises explicitly in Fig. III by plotting the fraction of atoms converted into molecules, the expectation value f=2∝an}b∇acketle{tb†b∝an}b∇acket∇i}ht N, (29) for the numerically obtained ground state. The diﬀerence between the dashed curves is the atom number, N= 10 andN= 100. The idea is near that, when the laser is swept from a large above-threshold detuning to a large (in absolute value) below-threshold value, the system will follow adi- abatically, and an atomic condensate is converted to a molecular condensates [8]. Moreover, if Ω were the rele- vant frequency scale, adiabaticity means that the detun- ing must change by Ω in a time of the order or longer than Ω−1. In our model we assume that the detuning is swept as δ(t) =−ξΩ2t. (30) We expect adiabatic following when ξ<∼1. This piece of intuition is correct. In Fig. 2 we repro- duce the relevant ﬁgure from Ref. [8]. We ﬁx N= 100. At an initial time giving δ=−20 Ω, we start the sys- tem in its ground state, almost purely atoms, and inte- grate the time dependent Schr¨ odinger equation numeri- cally while sweeping the detuning at two rates ξ= 1 and8 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0f 20 10 0 -10 -20 δ(t)/Ω ξ□=□0.1 □□□ξ□=□1 □ FIG. 2: Fraction of atoms converted to molecules, f= 2/angbracketleftb†b/angbracketright, as a function of instantaneous detuning, δ(t), when the de- tuning is swept linearly as a function of time according to δ(t) =−ξΩ2t. The ﬁgure is for the atom number N= 100, for the two sweep rates ξ= 0.1 and ξ= 1. ξ= 0.1. The plot gives the fraction of atoms converted to molecules as a function of the instantaneous detuning. Forξ= 1 we expect to be somewhere at the borderline of adiabaticity, and actually ﬁnd a conversion eﬃciency of 0.8. When the laser tuning is swept ten times more slowly,ξ= 0.1, the conversion eﬃciency has reached 0.97. We believe that we have discovered a feasible method for preparing a molecular condensate: start with an atomic condensate and a photoassociating laser, then sweep the frequency of the laser in a proper way, and obtain a molecular BEC. In the general manner of adia- batic methods, this “rapid adiabatic passage” should be robust. Besides its potential utility, rapid adiabatic passage is another example of coherent phenomena that occur in a condensate but not in a nondegenerate gas. Once more, in a nondegenerate gas the frequency scale for adiabaticity is κ, and the time scale is proportional to κ−1∝V1/2. Even if nothing else went wrong, in the limit of a large sample the time scale for adiabatic atom- molecule conversion would tend to inﬁnity. Once more, Bose enhancement saves the day by turning the volume dependence of the relevant frequency scale into a density dependence [15]. IV. FIELD THEORY FOR ALL MODES If only one spatial mode has to be considered for both the atomic and the molecular condensate, the two-mode Hamiltonian (15) is all there is to it. Nonetheless, even if somehow the inﬁnite homogeneous condensate could be approximated in practice, for whatever reason there would always be atoms and molecules present with mo- menta that are not included in the two-mode picture. As the full Hamiltonian (12) mixes momenta nonlinearly, the possibility of instability arises and should be investigat ed.We will study deviations from the two-mode picture, or the possibility that the (inﬁnite) atomic and molecular condensates are not spatially homogeneous. Here we use the quantum ﬁeld version of our photoassociation theory. But solving nonlinear quantum ﬁeld theories is generally not a simple matter, and one must approximate. We will resort to classical ﬁeld theory, the same way one proceeds when an alkali condensate is analyzed using the Gross- Pitaevskii equation. A. Gross-Pitaevskii equations To derive the Gross-Pitaevskii equations (GPE) for this problem, in the usual way we ﬁrst amend the Hamil- tonian by adding to it a multiple of the conserved particle number N=/summationdisplay k(a† kak+2b† kbk) =/integraldisplay d3r[φ†(r)φ(r)+2ψ†(r)ψ(r)]. (31) Instead of the Hamiltonian density, we then use the “Kamiltonian” density K(r) =H(r)−µ[φ†(r)φ(r) + 2ψ†(r)ψ(r)] (32) in our calculations. This substitution has no eﬀect on the dynamics. At this point the real scalar µis arbitrary. Though this piece of knowledge has no bearing on our analysis, in the end the constant µwill be analogous to chemical potential in thermodynamics. Hence, µis called the chemical potential. Using the standard commutators for boson ﬁelds, the Heisenberg equation of motion for the molecular ﬁeld be- comes i˙ψ(r) = [ψ(r),/integraldisplay d3r′K(r′) ¯h] =/bracketleftbigg −¯h∇2 4m+δ0−2µ ¯h/bracketrightbigg ψ(r)−1 2D(r)φ(r)φ(r). (33) The transformation to the classical ﬁeld theory is eﬀected by positing that the ﬁelds in the equations of motion are no longer boson ﬁelds, but commuting c-number ﬁelds. The interpretation is that φ(r) andψ(r) are the macro- scopic wave functions for atomic and molecular conden- sates. From this point onward we again take the driving ﬁeld to be a simple plane wave with the positive frequency part1 2Eeiq·r. Second, we scale the atomic and molecular ﬁelds with the square root of density,/radicalbig N/V. Third, we incorporate the spatial variation of the electric ﬁeld into the deﬁnition of the molecular ﬁeld. Altogether, we deﬁne new atomic and molecular ﬁelds Φ and Ψ as φ=/radicalbigg N VΦ, ψ =/radicalbigg N Veiq·rΨ. (34)9 The net results are four. First, the normalization of the ﬁelds now reads 1 V/integraldisplay d3r(\|Φ\|2+ 2\|Ψ\|2) = 1. (35) Second, the coeﬃcient Dgets multiplied by the square root of the atom density that would prevail if all molecules were to dissociate. Third, all explicit posi- tion dependence disappears from the equations of mo- tion. The GPE for the rescaled atomic and molecular wave functions are i˙Φ(r) =/bracketleftbigg −¯h∇2 2m−µ/bracketrightbigg Φ(r)−e−iϕΩ Φ∗(r)Ψ(r),(36) i˙Ψ(r) =/bracketleftbigg −¯h 4m∇2+i¯h 2mq· ∇+δ−2µ ¯h/bracketrightbigg Ψ(r) −1 2eiϕΩ [Φ(r)]2. (37) None other than our characteristic frequency scale for photoassociation, Ω of Eq. (27), is now explicitly the fre- quency scale in the ﬁeld equations as well. The phase factoreiϕaccounts for the phases of the electric ﬁeld and dipole moment, and will soon prove inconsequential. Fourth, a photon recoil term got added to the kinetic energy of the molecules. While still using full dimensional units, we pause to discuss the mathematical symmetries of the GPE. First, a trivial phase change of one of the ﬁelds, e.g., Φ → e−iϕ/2Φ, converts Eqs. (IVA) to the same equations, ex- cept that the phase factors vanish from atom-molecule interaction terms. Therefore, we drop the phase in the interaction term. Second, the GPE have a global gauge invariance. If the ﬁelds Φ, Ψ are a solution, then so are the ﬁelds Φ eiϕ, Ψe2iϕfor an arbitrary ﬁxed phase ϕ. In particular, putting ϕ= 2π, one may see that the equa- tions are invariant under the change of the sign of the ﬁeld Φ. Third, as a time dependent generalization of the gauge invariance, the GPE is invariant under the replace- ment Φ→Φei∆µt, (38) Ψ→Ψe2i∆µt, (39) µ→µ+ ∆µ. (40) Fourth, the GPE is Galilei invariant, in that the replace- ments Φ(r,t)→eik·rΦ/parenleftbigg r−¯hk mt,t/parenrightbigg , (41) Ψ(r,t)→e2ik·rΨ/parenleftbigg r−¯hk mt,t/parenrightbigg , (42) µ→µ+¯h2k2 2m, (43) δ→δ−¯hk m·q (44) convert a solution into another solution that corresponds to an added momentum ¯ hkper atom. The nontrivialpart of the transformation, Eq. (44) is that, due to the Doppler shift, the eﬀective detuning changes depending on the overall motion of the atom-molecule system. Finally, we express the GPE (IVA) in a speciﬁc system of units, t0=1 Ω, r0=/radicalbigg ¯h mΩ, m 0=m, (45) for time, length and mass respectively. Technically, we should rename the scaled variables and parameter; say, t=¯tt0,δ=¯δ/t0. However, we eschew such a heavy notation, and continue to use, e.g., the symbol δfor what now stands for a dimensionless number and should be properly denoted by ¯δ=δ/Ω. The result is i˙Φ =/bracketleftbig −1 2∇2−µ/bracketrightbig Φ−Φ∗Ψ, (46) i˙Ψ =/bracketleftbig −1 4∇2+1 2iq· ∇+δ−2µ/bracketrightbig Ψ−1 2Φ2.(47) The GPE equations are as stated in Ref. [14]. The plan now is to analyze them. Of course, equations of the type (IV A) are standard fare in studies of second- harmonic generation. The literature once more is exten- sive, and we will only give a few speciﬁc pointers as we go along. B. Steady state of GPE Atomic and molecular ﬁelds Φ and Ψ represent a sta- tionary state, one in which the physics does not change with time, if and only if their time evolution is solely in global (position independent) phase factors, possibly dif - ferent ones for Φ and Ψ. Now consider ﬁelds of the form Φ(r,t) = Φ(r)e−iωtand Ψ( r,t) = Ψ( r)e−2iωtfor any real ω. One sees right away that for this type of evolution, at least the exponential time dependence properly matches on both sides of Eqs. (IVA). Although we have not been able to prove it mathematically, we conjecture that, as- suming time independent parameters in Eqs. (IVA), this type of time dependence is also the only possible case in which the physics is independent of time. But then, by virtue of the transformation (IVA), by readjusting the chemical potential one can always remove the time dependence of the ﬁelds entirely in any station- ary state. The chemical potential started its life as an arbitrary parameter. From now on we make use of the arbitrariness and choose the value in such a way that in steady state the atomic and molecular ﬁelds are literally constants in time. We shall see shortly that, for any time independent de- tuningδ, one may pick a suitable value for the chemical potentialµso that the GPE (IVA) have solutions Φ 0, Ψ0 that are constants in both space and time. But by virtue of the Galilean transformation (IVA), we may then con- struct from Φ 0, Ψ0a stationary solution corresponding to an arbitrary overall ﬂow of atoms and molecules, so- lutions of the form Φ ∝eik·rand Ψ ∝e2ik·r. Conversely,10 we believe that all spatially homogeneous stationary so- lutions are such Galilean boosts of the once-and-for-all constant solutions Φ 0, Ψ0. As far as it comes to spatially homogeneous steady states, we therefore may, and will, without any restriction on generality consider ﬁelds that are constants in space and time. In the context of second-harmonic generation it is well known that the GPE may have spatially inhomogeneous solitary-wave type stationary solutions [23]. By applying the Galilean transformation, one may ﬁnd traveling soli- tary waves as well. Here we will make no eﬀort to ﬁnd, let alone classify, solitary-wave solutions to our GPE, but proceed as if the homogeneous steady states were all there is to it. Within the scope of the present paper, the stationary solutions thus satisfy 0 =−µΦ0−Φ∗ 0Ψ0, (48) 0 = (δ−2µ)Ψ0−1 2Φ2 0 (49) 1 =\|Φ0\|2+ 2\|Ψ0\|2, (50) where the ﬁnal equation originates from the normaliza- tion (35). Moreover, by virtue of the global gauge in- variance, one may choose Φ 0real. Next, because of the invariance of the GPE with respect to the sign change of Φ, we may always choose Φ 0to be nonnegative. Further- more, if Φ 0>0, then (48) shows that Ψ (like µ) must be real. On the other hand, if Φ 0= 0, Ψ 0comes with an ar- bitrary phase, and may be chosen real. All told, we only need to ﬁnd the real solutions Φ 0, Ψ0,µto Eqs. (IVB), and besides only solutions with Φ 0≥0 need be retained. There are three distinct solutions. The trivial one reads Φ0 0= 0,Ψ0 0=1√ 2, µ0=1 2δ; (51) forδ≤√ 2 we have Φ+ 0=/radicalbig 6−δ2−δ√ 6 +δ2 3, Ψ+ 0=−δ−√ 6 +δ2 6, µ+=−Ψ+ 0; (52) and forδ≥ −√ 2 we ﬁnd Φ− 0=/radicalbig 6−δ2+δ√ 6 +δ2 3, Ψ− 0=−δ+√ 6 +δ2 6, µ−=−Ψ− 0. (53) At least two steady states are found for each δ, and three in the interval −√ 2< δ <√ 2. The ques- tion is, which one represents the desired physical steady state. Here we attempt to mimic the ground state of thequantum-mechanical two-mode model (15), and choose the stationary solution so that [14] δ<−√ 2 : Φ 0= Φ0 0,Ψ0=ψ0 0,µ=µ0, δ≥ −√ 2 : Φ 0= Φ− 0,Ψ0=ψ− 0,µ=µ−.(54) The success is evident in Fig. III, where we plot side by side the fraction of atoms converted to molecules from the quantum-mechanical two-mode model and the cor- responding GPE approximation f= 2Ψ2 0(solid line) as a function of detuning. By comparing with the N= 10 andN= 100 quantum results, it may be seen that the agreement between the GPE and the quantum approach gets better as the number of atoms is increased. Even for an atom number as small as 100 and around the non- analytic point δ=−√ 2 of the GPE approximation (54), the diﬀerence is only on the order of one per cent. We conclude by noting that Eqs. (51) and (52) together give a stationary solution that is the exact mirror image of our choice (54) with the substitution δ→ −δ. This corresponds to the state with maximum energy for the two-mode quantum system. It is a stationary state just as is the minimum, and may be used for atom-molecule conversion. The diﬀerence is that, in the case of the maximum, the detuning would be swept in the opposite direction, from below to above the dissociation thresh- old. Otherwise rapid adiabatic passage should work es- sentially as before. C. Small excitations of the system So far, while analyzing the GPE, we have achieved nothing more than in our studies of the two-mode model; rather less, because in our classical ﬁeld theory we lose quantum ﬂuctuations. Nevertheless, we now have the tools to analyze the stability of the steady state, and see how spatial inhomogeneities evolve in time. As in Ref. [14], we linearize the GPE around a station- ary solution, and then attempt to ﬁnd eigenmodes for small deviations from the stationary case. Both of these steps are achieved at once by inserting the Ansatz Φ(r,t) = Φ 0+uΦei(p·r−ωt)+v∗ Φe−i(p·r−ω∗t)(55) into the GPE, and only retaining the ﬁrst-order terms in the “small” coeﬃcients uΦ,vΦ. Of course, the ﬁeld Ψ is treated similarly. We need to mix plane waves pand −pbecause the GPE mixes ﬁelds and their complex con- jugates. With our Ansatz we also retain the possibility that the evolution frequency of an eigenmode could be complex. The Ansatz succeeds if the as of yet unknown evolution frequencyωsatisﬁes the eigenvalue equations /bracketleftbig −1 2p2+µ+ω/bracketrightbig uΦ+ψ0vΦ+ Φ0uΨ= 0,(56) /bracketleftbig −1 2p2+µ−ω/bracketrightbig vΦ+ψ0uΦ+ Φ0vΨ= 0,(57) /bracketleftbig −1 4(p2+ 2p·q) + 2µ−¯δ+ω/bracketrightbig uΨ+ Φ0uΦ= 0,(58) /bracketleftbig −1 4(p2−2p·q) + 2µ−¯δ−ω/bracketrightbig vΨ+ Φ0vΦ= 0.(59)11 The characteristic equation is fourth order in ω, so in principle the solutions can always be written down an- alytically. However, here we use Mathematica [24] to produce results directly numerically, and occasionally to extract analytical forms for special and limiting cases. The dispersion relations of the excitation modes, ω= ω(p), depend on the relative propagation directions of the excitation and of light, and also on the size of the photon recoil kick. We encompass these dependences into a dimensionless parameter, which in terms of the original dimensional parameters reads η=/radicalBigg ¯h(q·p)2 mΩp·p. (60) Given the parameter ηand the absolute value pof the (dimensionless) propagation vector p, the terms that de- pend on photon recoil in Eqs. (IVC) are replaced as fol- lows, 1 4(p2±2p·q)→1 4(p2±2ηp). (61) For ﬁxed values of the parameters δ,ηandp, there are four excitation modes with four (in general) diﬀerent evolution frequencies ω. If a positive imaginary part is encountered in any one of the four frequencies, the corre- sponding mode grows exponentially and the steady state is unstable. Let us take the wave vector characterizing the small- excitation mode to be perpendicular to the propagation direction of light, η= 0. We begin with p= 0 and assume \|Ψ0\|2<1 2, a nontrivial mix of atoms and molecules. We ﬁnd the solutions to the characteristic equation for the eigenvalue problem (IVC) ω2 1(0) = 0. (62) ω2 2(0) =/parenleftbigg 3 +1 2\|Ψ0\|2/parenrightbigg/parenleftbigg1 2− \|Ψ0\|2/parenrightbigg .(63) When the wave number of the excitation moves away fromp= 0, of the four frequencies the two evolving con- tinuously from ±ω2(0) remain real. Their dispersion re- lations for small pare of the type ω2(p)≃ω2(0)+1 2m∗p2, withm∗≥0, so that these excitations are akin to optical phonons. On the other hand, the remaining two excita- tion frequencies are either purely real or purely imagi- nary, and for small enough pthey are always imaginary. Such modes do not propagate at all, but grow or shrink in place exponentially. In fact, in Fig. 3, which is transcribed from Ref. [14], we plot the largest imaginary part among the four fre- quenciesω,\|ℑ[ω1]\|, as a function of the detuning δand the wave number pof the excitation mode. As above, we setη= 0. It may be seen that, for any detuning δ >−√ 2, an unstable excitation mode is always found. The largest imaginary part of an evolution frequency, i.e, the largest growth rate of an instability, is encoun- tered atδ=−0.154496 and p=±0.771324, and equals ℑ(ω) = 0.24256. FIG. 3: Largest imaginary part among the four evolution frequencies of small perturbations of the joint atom-molec ule condensate is plotted as a function of the laser detuning δ and the wave number of the plane-wave like perturbation p. In this ﬁgure the excitation mode propagates perpendicular ly to the propagation direction of light, so that ξ= 0. The analogous instability is naturally known in second- harmonic generation, and goes under the rubric “modu- lational instability” [25, 26]. We next come to the eﬀect of the direction of the wave vector of the mode on instability. In Fig. 4 we plot the largest positive imaginary part of a mode frequency found for anypas a function of the parameter η. The curves are labeled with their corresponding ﬁxed detunings δ. In our studies of this kind, the largest growth rate of the instability was always found for η= 0. For a given de- tuning, the small excitations whose momentum direction is perpendicular to light propagation always present the most unstable scenario. Finally consider the largest growth rate of the instabil- ity (among all p) as a function of the detuning. As may be inferred from Fig. 3, with increasing detuning δ>∼1 it decreases and occurs at smaller momenta, i.e., at larger size scales. In fact, for δ≫1, the maximum growth rate12 0 2 4 60.000.050.100.150.200.25 δ =- δ =0 δ =1/√2 δ =√2 δ =2 √2 δ =4 √2max{ Im[ω]} η1/√2 FIG. 4: Largest imaginary part in a small-excitation evolu- tion frequency encountered for any value of the wave number of the excitation pis plotted against the parameter ξthat characterizes the component of the photon recoil momentum in the direction of the propagation vector of the small exci- tation p. The explicit deﬁnition of ξis given in Eq. (60). Diﬀerent curves are for diﬀerent ﬁxed detunings δ, as identi- ﬁed in the legend. of an instability R(δ) = max {ℑ[ω(p,δ)]}pbehaves as R(δ)∼/bracketleftbigg1 2δ−5 4δ3+O(1 δ5)/bracketrightbigg , (64) and the corresponding position of the maximum pM(δ), the value of the momentum such that ℑ[ω(p,δ)]≤ ℑ[ω(pM,δ)] for allp, goes like pM(δ)∼/radicalbigg 1 δ/bracketleftbigg 1−1 δ2+47 16δ4+O(1 δ6)/bracketrightbigg . (65) Of course, as the largest growth rate of the instability seems to occur for η= 0, this was our choice in Eqs. (64) and (65). In sum, we have found that for δ≤ −√ 2 the steady state of the atom-molecule system is stable, and for any δ>−√ 2 it is unstable. Although we have reported only on a speciﬁc stationary solution (54), possibly one out of three, the modes we have not considered explicitly are all unstable. But δ=−√ 2 is also the watershed, in that below δ=−√ 2 the steady state is all molecules (Φ0= 0), and above δ=−√ 2 some atoms are involved. All told, the steady state with everything in molecules is stable forδ≤ −√ 2, but any steady state involving atoms is always unstable. The most unstable situation occurs aroundδ≃0, with about an equal mixture of atoms and molecules. For δ≫1 atoms take over, and the time scale for the instability grows longer.D. Fate of unstable system Linearized stability analysis has shown that a joint atom-molecule condensate is unstable in the presence of photoassociating light, i.e., there are small-excitati on modes that grow exponentially. But when a small devi- ation from steady state grows exponentially, eventually it is not a small deviation anymore and the linearized analysis breaks down. To investigate the fate of the sys- tem once the instability has set in, we integrate the full GPE numerically as in Ref. [14]. Our aim is a qualita- tive demonstration, so we proceed in 1 + 1 dimensions, one spatial coordinate xand timet. However, there is nothing in our method that would not immediately work in higher spatial dimensions. The restriction is merely a matter of computer time. Speciﬁcally, in our algorithm we discretize a stretch L of the line into equidistant points xi, and seek to repre- sent the ﬁelds at these discrete points only. For conve- nience, we use periodic boundary conditions, so that the value of all functions repeats over L. The GPE is inte- grated over a time step hin two moves. First we ignore the position derivatives in the GPE altogether. This im- plies that the stripped-down version of the GPE is local; for eachxi, Φ(xi) and Ψ(xi) only couple to Φ( xi) and Ψ(xi). We integrate the local version of the GPE over the timehseparately for each xias two coupled diﬀer- ential equations using a second-order Runge-Kutta step. To prevent a numerical drift of the norm, we complete the initial step of the algorithm by normalizing the ﬁelds analogously to Eq. (35). Second, we ignore anything but the position derivatives in the GPE. The resulting par- tial version of the GPE is nonlocal, but in exchange it is linear and does not mix the ﬁelds Φ and Ψ. To integrate over the same (sic!) time step as in the initial part of the algorithm, we ﬁrst take the Fourier transform of the result from the ﬁrst part using the Fast Fourier Trans- formation (FFT). In Fourier space position derivatives become local, so, to propagate the ﬁelds over the step h, we simply multiply their Fourier transforms by what is now the local, exact (within FFT), linear time evolution operator. Finally, in preparation for the next step, we transform back to real space. This split-step algorithm is an obvious variation of the time honored split-operator methods for linear partial diﬀerential equations [27], and has been described be- fore at least by the group of Firth [28]. Nonetheless, it comes with a fair dose of heuristics. It is therefore grat- ifying that we have been able to verify a good rate of convergence by using successively smaller time steps to integrate over a ﬁxed interval of time. We present an example of our simulations in Fig. 5, showing the absolute square of the atomic ﬁeld \|Φ\|2as a function of position xand timet. We use 128 points xi. Because of the periodic boundary conditions, the left and right edges of xwrap around and are actually the same. The plot is for the parameters δ= 0,η= 0, the range of position xis 24.6282 (in units of r0) correspond-13 FIG. 5: An example to demonstrate the modulational insta- bility of the joint atom-molecule condensate. Atom density \|Φ\|2is plotted as a function of the spatial coordinate xand timet, given that the system starts out at time t= 0 in the steady state plus a small amount of random noise. ing to three wavelengths of the most unstable excitation mode for these parameters, and time truns from 0 to 127 (in units of t0). The unit of \|Φ\|2, atom density, is such that for a homogeneous gas with everything in atoms, the density would be \|Φ\|2≡1. The system starts at time t= 0 in the steady state appropriate for δ= 0,η= 0, except that we add a small amount of Gaussian noise to each of the points specifying the initial state. Figure 5 is otherwise the same as Fig. 2 in Ref. [14], except that a diﬀerent seed was used for the random number gener- ator that added the noise. As beﬁts an instability, this innocuous change has lead to a totally diﬀerent quanti- tative result at long times. From the numerical simulations we see that the nature of the instability is such that the atoms and the molecules together combine into dense clumps. These clumps movearound, and tend to join when they collide. As far as we can tell, within the present model only one big, dense clump will remain in the end. One might wonder what is the mechanism behind the clumping. We present a heuristic guess. We are not talk- ing about a thermodynamic system, so minimization of energy is a dubious principle to begin with; and besides, we are dealing with quasienergies in a rotating frame, not real energies. With these warnings out of the way, let us surmise that the system nevertheless attempts to mini- mize its energy. The atomic and molecular condensates make something akin to the two-level system in quantum optics. When light is added, one gets a dressed two-level system. The energy of the lower one of the two dressed states decreases with increasing Rabi frequency, which is the product of the electric ﬁeld strength of the laser and the dipole moment. But the analog of Rabi frequency for the two-level system of atomic and molecular conden- sates, Ω, is also proportional to the square root of density, so the present system may also decrease its energy by in- creasing the density. Maybe this is what the instability is about. V. EXPERIMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS The models we have discussed until now have been rather rudimentary. We next take up two types of com- plications that may come up in experiments. First, in Sec. VA enters an angle that is in principle included in our many-body Hamiltonian, although we have not yet considered it expressly: photodissociation of conden- sate molecules to states outside of the atomic condensate. It turns out to limit the rate at which one can achieve coherent atom-molecule conversion in adiabatic passage. Second, in Sec. VB we discuss a number of aspects that have so far been missing from our models: spontaneous emission from the photoassociated state, atom-atom in- teractions, trapping of atoms and molecules, and various level shifts. Spontaneous emission can be ameliorated by resorting to a two-color photoassociation scheme. Pro- vided that photoassociation is speedy enough, which we believe is technically possible, the rest of these complica - tions may be minor nuisances rather than dominant fea- tures of an experiment. What it takes to make photoas- sociation speedy enough is the subject of Sec. VC, where we discuss the characteristic Rabi frequency for photoas- sociation Ω for various alkalis. Finally, in Sec. VD, we analyze the published experiment of Ref. [16] from our viewpoint of coherent photoassociation. A. Rogue photodissociation As we noted already, in the case of photoassociation of an inﬁnite homogeneous condensate, momentum con- servation uniquely determines the state of the ensuing molecule. The converse, however, does not hold. When14 a molecule photodissociates into two atoms, momentum conservation does not force the atoms to return to the atomic condensate. Bose enhancement favors recombi- nation of atoms with the condensate; the characteristic frequency is Ω for both photoassociation andphotodis- sociation between atomic and molecular condensates. Nonetheless, atoms winding up elsewhere are lost for co- herent photoassociation. We have coined the term “rogue photodissociation” for photodissociation processes that send atoms outside the atomic condensate. One might think that energy conservation in the cy- cle of photoassociation and photodissociation is the ad- ditional constraint that guarantees that the atoms return to the condensate. But this need not be a compelling ar- gument. Any time dependence in the system interferes with energy conservation. For instance, suppose that photodissociation proceeds to the noncondensate states at the same rate Γ 0(per atom) as it would in the case of a nondegenerate gas of molecules, so that after a time ∼Γ−1 0coherent photoassociation ceases. The photodis- sociation rate Γ 0in itself furnishes a time scale such that energy has to be conserved only to within ¯ hΓ0. The time evolution involved in nonlinear Rabi ﬂopping would also interfere with energy conservation. We present here a rudimentary model for rogue pho- todissociation for the special case when the detuning is swept in order to convert an atomic condensate to a molecular condensate. The key assumption is that we may employ the standard Markov approximation in the analysis of photodissociation. This entails that rogue photodissociation has no memory, but is characterized at each instant of time by a rate of exponential decay. Such an assumption seems dubious in particular when the laser is tuned to the close vicinity of the photodis- sociation threshold [29]. However, we know of no near- threshold case of this kind in which the breakdown of the Markov approximation has proven relevant in an experi- ment. Evidently, only the condensate mode, one of very many atomic modes, is strongly aﬀected by Bose enhancement. We take rogue photodissociation to proceed at the rate that would be appropriate for a nondegenerate gas at the given detuning. Second, we model the dependence of the photodissociation rate on detuning using the Wigner threshold law, so that we write Γ(δ) =θ(δ)/radicalbigg δ ΩΓ0. (66) For convenience we have chosen the photoassociation fre- quency scale Ω as the reference detuning for photodis- sociation rate; Γ 0is the photodissociation rate for the detuningδ= Ω. As the third quantitative element of the model, we take the probability that a given atom is in the molecular condensate to be twice the square of the molecular ﬁeld amplitude as solved from the classical ﬁeld theory, and normalized as in (50). Explicitly, in di- mensional units and for δ≥0, this probability is foundfrom Eq. (53) as PM(δ) =1 18 −/parenleftbiggδ Ω/parenrightbigg +/radicalBigg 6 +/parenleftbiggδ Ω/parenrightbigg2 2 (67) Suppose now that the detuning is swept as δ=−ξΩ2t, as in our rapid adiabatic passage example. Ignoring the depletion of the condensates due to the very same rogue photodissociation, we ﬁnd the total probability for rogue photodissociation P=/integraldisplay δ(t)≥0dtPM[δ(t)] Γ0/radicalbigg δ(t) Ω =Γ0 ξΩ/bracketleftbigg23/4 31/4/integraldisplay∞ 0dτ√τ/parenleftBig/radicalbig 1 +τ2−τ/parenrightBig2/bracketrightbigg =αΓ0 ξΩ, (68) where the numerical constant has the value α= 4.03197. Except for the numerical factor, this is the same expres- sion we already used in a qualitative estimate in Ref. [8]. Since the photodissociation rate grows linearly with light intensity, ∝I, and the photoassociation character- istic frequency Ω is proportional to the ﬁeld strength of the laser, ∝√ I, in the end rogue photodissociation wins out as the light intensity is increased. Qualitatively, whe n P= 1, rogue photodissociation has overtaken coherent conversion of atoms to molecules. To study this border- line case, we ﬁrst set P= 1 in Eq. (68) and solve Γ 0as a function of Ω. We then insert the result into Eq. (27), thus eliminating Γ 0. Moreover, the velocity v0in Eq. (27) is then the relative velocity of the dissociated atoms cor- responding to the detuning of the laser that gave the photoassociation rate Γ 0, in this case δ= Ω. Therefore we havev2 0/2µ= ¯hΩ, andv0may be eliminated as well. We ﬁnally solve for the borderline value Ω as a function of the problem parameters. After simple manipulations the ensuing characteristic frequency scale for photoasso- ciation may be written ˆΩ =/parenleftBigg 8√ 2πξ α/parenrightBigg2/3 (ρλ3)2/3ǫR. (69) Here we have introduced λ, wavelength of the light di- vided by 2π, and the familiar recoil frequency for laser cooling ǫR=¯h 2mλ2. (70) The main ﬁnding is that rogue photodissociation re- stricts the light intensity that one may proﬁtably use for adiabatic atom-molecule conversion. This means that there is also a maximum usable photoassociation fre- quency, or a minimum possible time scale for adiabatic atom-molecule conversion. The way we have written our15 estimate (69), the frequency scale is provided by the pho- ton recoil frequency, and the corresponding time scale is in the ballpark of ǫ−1 R. The density dependence of pho- toassociation is encapsulated in the parameter ρλ3, the usual dimensionless parameter that governs the coupling of light with matter in a dense medium. For present-day condensates ρλ3∼1 is a reasonable rule of thumb. Fi- nally, we have a numerical constant that depends on the rate of sweeping of the detuning, but which may also be set equal to one in a rough estimate. Altogether, when in need of a qualitative number for the photoassociation frequency Ω, we resort to Ω ∼ǫR. Although our estimate of the minimum time scale for coherent photoassociation was developed for rapid adia- batic passage, we believe that (with ξ≃1) it also applies to Rabi ﬂopping. This is because the dimensional pa- rameters of the problem are the same in both cases. In fact, as it comes to dimensional quantities, the minimum time scale for coherent photoassociation is equivalently written [30] τ∼m ¯hρ2/3. (71) This is the essentially unique quantity with the dimension of time that can be put together using the quantities characterizing a homogeneous, noninteracting, quantum mechanical, zero-temperature BEC; density, atom mass, and ¯h. B. Physics missing from model 1. Spontaneous emission We have discussed a one-color model for photoasso- ciation. The physical drawback is that, where there is a strong dipole matrix element for photoassocia- tion/dissociation driven by external light, there is also a strong dipole matrix element for spontaneous emission. For instance, if a photon is absorbed in photoassocia- tion, then there is also a reverse spontaneous decay of the molecule. The molecule may end up in bound vibrational states, either in the same electronic manifold where the atoms started from, or in some other electronic manifold. Alternatively, the photoassociated molecule may decay back to a dissociation continuum in a process known as radiative escape. Either way, usually the probability is small that the system returns to the same two-atom state in which is started. After each process of spontaneous emission, two atoms are typically lost for any proﬁtable use. The analogous problem of an unstable excited state is standard fare in quantum optics, and so is the solu- tion: add another laser-driven transition from the spon- taneously decaying state to a stable state. In the same way, two-color Raman photoassociation, a free-bound transition followed by a bound-bound transition of the molecule, may take place between (nearly) non-decayingab gκχ δ□∆ ΓsΓ+ FIG. 6: Schematic three-level scheme for photoassociation . The levels a,bandgstand for atoms, primary photoassociated molecules, and ﬁnal stable molecules, respectively. The ﬁg ure is drawn in the rotating frame, so that the Rabi frequencies κandχrepresenting the laser ﬁelds are independent of time, and the intermediate and two-photon detunings ∆ and δare drawn as appropriate level energies. atomic and molecular states [7, 32, 33]. Here we study Raman photoassociation as a means of achieving an eﬀec- tive two-mode scheme; genuine three-mode phenomena such as STIRAP are discussed elsewhere [13] Our present notation for this scheme is sketched in Fig. 6. Suppose the ﬁrst step of photoassociation takes place with absorption of a photon, then one sets up an- other laser to force, say, induced emission from the pri- mary photoassociated state to a (more) stable bound molecular state. We call the Rabi frequency in the second stepχ, the detuning of the laser from resonance in the second transition ∆, and the spontaneous decay rate of the primary photoassociation state Γ s. In this context δ stands for the two-photon detuning, the total energy mis- match for light-induced transition from the initial atoms to the ﬁnal stable molecular state, including appropriate photon recoil corrections. Let us model our three-level Λ scheme using a variation of the two-mode model (15) as H ¯h=δg†g+ (∆+δ)b†b−χ(b†g+g†b)−1 2κ(b†aa+ba†a†), (72) whereg, for “ground”, is the annihilation operator for the stable molecular state. Once more, we have added a multiple of the conserved particle number, this time in such a way that the atoms have zero energy. The term ∝χdescribes transitions between the bound molecular states. Spontaneous losses from the intermediate state are ignored for the time being. The Heisenberg equations of motion from Hamilto- nian (72) are ˙g=−iδg+iχb, (73) ˙b=−i(∆ +δ)b+iχg+1 2iκaa, (74) ˙a=iκa†b. (75) We next eliminate the intermediate state adiabatically with the assumption that ∆ is the largest evolution fre- quency in the system. We thus formally set ˙b= 0, and16 obtain b≃χg+1 2κaa ∆. (76) Inserting this into Eqs. (73) and (75), we have ˙g=−i/parenleftbigg δ−χ2 ∆/parenrightbigg g+1 2iκχ ∆aa, (77) ˙a=iκχ ∆a†g+1 2iκ2 ∆a†aa. (78) These are Heisenberg equations of motion for the eﬀective Hamiltonian Heﬀ ¯h=/parenleftbigg δ−χ2 ∆/parenrightbigg g†g−1 4κ2 ∆a†a†aa−1 2κχ ∆(a†a†g+g†aa). (79) The eﬀective Hamiltonian describes a two-level system with the two-photon detuning δand two-photon Rabi frequencyκχ/∆ in lieu of the usual detuning and Rabi frequency. There are two additional twists to the story. First, the two-photon resonance experiences a light shift −χ2/∆, an old acquaintance from quantum optics. Sec- ond, we have an eﬀective atom-atom interaction propor- tional toκ2/∆. An analogous interaction in a nonde- generate gas was discussed earlier in Ref. [31]. Other than these tweaks, everything we have said about the two-mode model applies as before. The adiabatic elimination (76) has a dark side hidden by a notational trick, namely, that it does not preserve boson commutators. Had we written the right-hand side in Eq. (75) as ba†instead ofa†band substituted (76), the atom-atom interaction term in the eﬀective Hamiltonian would have displayed the operator ordering aaa†a†in- stead ofa†a†aa. The diﬀerence is immaterial for a large atom number, the limit we are studying anyway, but a more careful investigation of the adiabatic elimination would be in order if the atom number were not large. As excessive care with operator products is not war- ranted, we write from the adiabatic assumption the num- ber of atoms in the intermediate state bqualitatively as b†b∼/parenleftBigχ ∆/parenrightBig2 g†g+/parenleftBigκ 2∆/parenrightBig2 (a†a)2. (80) Let us scale the operators by√ N, i.e., write b=√ Nβ, and so forth. Then, within a factor of two, the quantum expectation value ∝an}b∇acketle{tβ†β∝an}b∇acket∇i}htis the probability that an atom is in the intermediate state, and so on. Equation (80) becomes β†β∼/parenleftBigχ ∆/parenrightBig2 γ†γ+/parenleftbiggΩ 2∆/parenrightbigg2 (α†α)2. (81) The fraction of atoms lost per unit time to spon- taneous emission from the intermediate state equals 2Γs∝an}b∇acketle{tβ†β∝an}b∇acket∇i}ht.The intermediate detuning ∆ suppresses losses by a factor ∝1/∆2, whereas the eﬀective Rabi frequency scales as 1/∆. In principle, and at the present level of the physical model, it is possible to get rid of the harmful spontaneous emission to any desired degree by increasing the intermediate detuning.2. Interactions between atoms and molecules Atoms interact among themselves, molecules interact with molecules, and atoms even interact with molecules. For a dilute gas, the atom-atom interaction is often de- scribed by the eﬀective two-body potential U(r1,r2) =4π¯h2a mδ(r1−r2), (82) whereais thes-wave scattering length for the atoms as before. One may write analogous models for atom- molecule and molecule-molecule interactions. If atom- atom interactions were suspected to be a factor, one could add to the ﬁeld theory the usual two-body atom-atom interactions as HAA=2π¯h2a mφ†(r)φ†(r)φ(r)φ(r), (83) and so on. Inelastic collisions, such as quenching of the molecules by collisions, may also prove important. At a phenomenological level, they could be described by using a complex scattering length for atom-molecule collisions. Nonetheless, we have considered neither elastic nor in- elastic collisions explicitly in this paper. The motivatio n is mainly pragmatic. Photoassociation is the novelty of this work anyway. Second, at this point in time virtually nothing is known about the scattering lengths for cases other than atom-atom interactions. Third, as pointed out in Sec. VA, we anticipate a characteristic frequency scale for photoassociation, Ω, to be of the order of pho- ton recoil frequency ǫRof laser cooling, say, ten kilohertz. This is larger than a typical frequency scale associated with collisions, 4 π¯haρ/m , in many of the present alkali experiments. Photoassociation should dominate the ac- tion at least over short time scales. More formally, we see from Eqs. (69) and (71) that the maximum usable photoassociation frequency scales with atom density as ρ2/3, while the rate of binary collisions scales asρ. In principle and at this level of modeling, it is always possible to make photoassociation win out by decreasing the density. Of course, not all of our discussions are for short times only. Notably, in the case of the instability of a joint atom-molecule condensate, it may well happen that col- lisional interactions eventually play a role in the clump- ing. We plan to return to collisional eﬀects in a future publication, inasmuch as something worthwhile emerges from this front. 3. Trapping of atoms In the current alkali vapor experiments one does not see inﬁnite homogeneous condensates, but the conden- sate is ordinarily conﬁned to a magnetic trap with a (practically quadratic) potential V(r). This may be17 taken into account in the ﬁeld theory by adding a term in the Hamiltonian density, HVA(r) =φ†(r)V(r)φ(r). (84) A similar additional term would describe trapping of molecules. In fact, the beauty of the ﬁeld theoretical formulation is that it does not depend on any given one-particle ba- sis to describe the motion of the atoms and molecules. The photoassociation term was originally discussed us- ing plane-wave states, which makes the derivation easy, but at the level of ﬁeld theory there is no manifest vestige of plane waves anymore. Even if we add trapping poten- tials, there is no need to tamper with the photoassocia- tion term. This should be contrasted with the more del- icate situation that emerges if one tries to consider pho- toassociation directly using the eigenstates of the trap, or indeed some states that would take into account both trapping and atom-atom interactions. Once more, if the photoassociation frequency scale is of the order ǫR, it is still vastly larger than the typi- cal frequency scales associated with magnetic trapping of atoms, and the corresponding length scale for pho- toassociation, λ, is far smaller than the size of a typical condensate. Over short times the condensates behave lo- cally as if they were homogeneous. One just applies the theory of an inﬁnite condensates at each local density, and averages the results over the trap. On the other hand, there are cases in our formulation where the trapping will matter. For Ω ∼ǫRthe modu- lational instability may well set in as in a homogeneous condensate, but the motion of the atoms and molecules due to the trapping forces will certainly have a long-term eﬀect on the atom-molecule clumps. We do not discuss this issue here, but plan to return to trapping in a future publication. 4. Level shifts We have already mentioned a few mechanisms that can change the position of the photoassociation resonance. Atom-atom and molecule-molecule interactions alter the energy per atom or per molecule, and thereby modify the resonance condition for photoassociation. Since the atom-molecule ratio conversely depends on the detuning, the makings of bistability and hysteresis are in princi- ple there. We have also discussed the light shift and the many-body shift in a two-color, three-mode conﬁgura- tion. One more shift we have brought up before [6, 7], but not yet in this paper, arises because the dissociation con- tinuum is not ﬂat. Given the initial state, the dipole ma- trix element (or more precisely, the square of the dipole matrix element per unit energy) depends on the ﬁnal continuum state. The result is that the photodissocia- tion rate picks up an imaginary part. That, of course,amounts to a shift of the photodissociating state with re- spect to the continuum. The shift is proportional to light intensity, and in a qualitative estimate is comparable to the photodissociation rate; see, e.g., Refs. [34]. Moreover, there are additional shifts due to the pres- ence of each and every discrete state dipole-coupled to the initial state. The sum of all light shifts is actually ﬁ- nite only because the dipole coupling eventually tends to zero when one goes high enough in the energy of the cou- pled states. The implication is that, a priori , all dipole coupled states, even those oﬀ resonance by perhaps sev- eral photon energies, have to be considered explicitly. If one ﬁnds a signiﬁcant contribution to the light shift from onefar-oﬀ resonance state, chances are that one has to consider allof them. We will not attempt to address continuum and non- resonant light shifts explicitly. Nonetheless, on the ba- sis of the atomic case discussed in Refs. [34], we believe that, at least above the photodissociation threshold, the light shift should be reasonably independent of where ex- actly the laser is tuned. This would mean that, in the rapid adiabatic passage type atom-molecule conversion, the light shift merely gives a constant bias to the detun- ing, and is virtually inconsequential. C. Numerical examples 1. From rate to Rabi frequency One-color photoassociation has been analyzed by vari- ous groups [35], in particular for alkalis at ﬁnite tempera- ture. A typical outcome is the photoassociation rate Rv′ (in s−1) or the photoabsorption rate coeﬃcient αPA v′(in cm5) for a given bound level v′of the excited electronic state. The latter quantity is independent of two experi- mental parameters, namely atom density ρand laser in- tensityI. The rate of photoassociation Rv′is obtained via Rv′=ρϕαPA v′, (85) where the photon ﬂux (photons/scm2) is given by ϕ= I/¯hωL,ωLbeing the photon frequency. But we also know from our earlier work [6, 7] that the photoassociation rate in a thermal sample is given in terms of our detuning δ, temperature T, and photoasso- ciation rate Γ as Rv′=e−¯hδ kBTρλ3 DΓ, (86) where λD=/parenleftbigg2π¯h2 µkBT/parenrightbigg1/2 (87) is the usual thermal de Broglie wavelength, albeit cal- culated using the reduced mass of the colliding atoms. In what follows, we write the detuning parameter for18 photoassociation as δ=ω∞−ωL−∆v′, where ¯hω∞is the asymptotic energy diﬀerence between the electronic curves and ∆ v′is the red-detuning of level v′from its asymptote. The binding energy of the molecular state is thus equal to ¯ h∆v′. Combining Eqs. (85) and (86) with Eq. (27), we have an expression for the characteristic fre- quency of coherent photoassociation to the level v′, Ωv′=e¯hδ 2kBT/radicalBigg 2π¯h2αPA v′ϕρ vµ2λ3 D. (88) In all of our discussion below we choose the detuning in such a way that ¯ hδ=1 2kBT, which gives the cor- responding resonance velocity v=/radicalbig kBT/µ. Strictly speaking, Eq. (27) requires the limit v→0, or equiva- lently,δ→0. However, we always assume, without ex- plicitly checking this assumption, that the temperature is already low enough to bring the system into the region of validity of the Wigner threshold law. The quotient Γ/vin Eq. (27) has then supposedly reached the v→0 limit. We have already introduced the usual density param- eter for light-matter coupling λ3ρto characterize atom density, and the recoil frequency ǫRas the frequency scale. In the same vein, we write the Rabi frequency for photoassociation as Ωv′ ǫR=/radicalBigg/parenleftbiggI Iv′/parenrightbigg/radicalBig (λ3ρ), (89) whereIv′is the characteristic light intensity for coher- ent photoassociation. In explicit numbers, we ﬁnd from Eq. (88) Iv′=1.46245×10−26 /bracketleftbigmu/bracketrightbig2/bracketleftBigT K/bracketrightBig/bracketleftBigλnm/bracketrightBig2/bracketleftbigg αPA v′ cm5/bracketrightbiggW cm2, (90) which also displays the units used to express atomic mass m, temperature T, wavelength of light λ, and photoab- sorption coeﬃcient αPA v′. 2. Calculated photoassociation rates One can estimate the photoabsorption rate coeﬃcient for a pair of atoms. At low temperatures, only s-wave scattering contributes to the process, and one ﬁnds [17, 36] αPA v′(ω,T)≃4π2ω 3cλ3 De−¯hδ kBT\|Dv′(¯hδ)\|2, (91) In the low-temperature limit, the dipole matrix element \|Dv′(¯hδ)\|2can be approximated by \|Dv′(E)\|2≡ \|∝an}b∇acketle{tv′,J= 1\|D\|¯hδ,J= 0∝an}b∇acket∇i}ht, ≃/parenleftbigg2µk π¯h2/parenrightbigg \|D0\|2(a−Rv′)2S2 v′(92)TABLE I: Photoabsorption rate coeﬃcients αPA v′(in cm5) and characteristic intensities Iv′(in W cm−2) for levels v′ with the best simultaneous Franck-Condon factors with the continuum and the highest-lying level of the lower electron ic state, and for levels corresponding to detunings near 1 cm−1. The vibrational number v′as well as the corresponding bind- ing energy ∆ v′(in cm−1) are also given. Calculations were performed for T=1 mK. singlet triplet 6Li7Li6Li7Li v′70 69 51 58 ∆v′ 36.4 86.7 164 122 αPA v′2.8×10−322.4×10−322.3×10−312.0×10−32 Iv′ 32 27 3 .9 33 v′87 94 79 86 ∆v′ 0.99 0.99 1.05 0.87 αPA v′6.7×10−307.8×10−309.2×10−292.1×10−29 Iv′ 0.13 0 .085 0 .0098 0 .032 withE= ¯h2k2/2µ= ¯hδ, whereD0=\|d\|is the asymp- totic dipole moment, ais the scattering length, Rv′is the classical outer turning point of the excited level v′, and Sv′is a dimensionless parameter representing the frac- tion of the bound wave function contained in the last node [17, 36, 37]. For example, given7Li atoms in a triplet state at 1 mK, a detailed calculation [37] showed that the excited levelv′= 58 has the best Franck-Condon factor with the continuum and the highest-lying bound level v′′= 10 of the lower triplet electronic state, with αPA v′=58= 2.0×10−32cm5[38]. The corresponding characteristic intensity is Iv′=58= 33 Wcm−2. Beyond this, in Fig. 7 we give the calculated rate co- eﬃcients for high-lying vibrational states for both stable isotopes of Li, for both the singlet and the triplet excited states. Correspondingly, Table I presents a few numer- ical examples of the rate coeﬃcients and characteristic intensities. Much larger photoassociation rates and correspond- ingly smaller characteristic intensities can be obtained if the excited levels v′are closer to the dissociation limit (i.e., have smaller binding energies). In fact, the v′= 58 level is deeply bound, with a binding energy of ¯h∆v′=58= 5.5×10−4hartree (or 122.22 cm−1[39]). For example,v′= 86 with a binding energy of 0 .87 cm−1 has a rate coeﬃcient 1050 times larger, namely αPA v′=86= 2.1×10−29cm5, which gives the characteristic intensity Iv′=86= 0.032 Wcm−2. The high-lying excited levels v′ have larger rate coeﬃcients because the overlap of the excited bound wave function and the continuum ground wave function is larger. For high v′, the overlap scales19 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 ∆□ (cm-1)10-3410-3210-3010-28 6Li triplet 7Li triplet10-3410-3210-3010-28αv’ (cm5) 6Li singlet 7Li singlet600 500 400 300 200 100 010-3610-3410-3210-3010-28 7Li singlet (a) (b) (c) v’PA FIG. 7: Variation of photoassociation rate coeﬃcient αPA v′for high-lying vibrational states. In (a), the7Li singlet transi- tions over a range of 600 cm−1exhibit oscillations mapping the nodal structure of the continuum wave function, with val - ues varying over ﬁve orders of magnitude. Plots (b) and (c) show a shorter range of detunings for singlet and triplet tra n- sitions, respectively. The singlet scattering lengths of b oth isotopes are positive and αPA v′decays rapidly from its large values near ∆ ∼0 cm−1, by nearly three orders of magnitude. The triplet scattering lengths are both negative, and αPA v′de- creases slowly for small detunings, until the ﬁrst nodes of t he continuum wave functions are reached. like ∆−1/2 v′. Similar results for sodium and cesium are available. For small binding energies, the rate coeﬃcient αPA v′at 1 mK is of the order of 10−28cm5for Na, and 10−27 cm5for Cs [40]. These translate to characteristic inten- sities as small as µW cm−2. Notice that for lithium, the rate coeﬃcients for singlet transitions are smaller than for triplet transitions, reﬂecting the sign of the scatter- ing length: this is especially signiﬁcant for6Li, where the triplet scattering length is negative and enormous [18]. Other expressions based on semi-classical treatment have been developed [40, 41]. For example, in [41], the rate fors-wave contribution is Rv′≃ρλ3 De−¯hδ kBT/radicalBigg π2 3δ∆v′sin2[k(Rv′−A(k))]κ2; (93) whereκ=d·E/2¯his the Rabi frequency of the laser of intensityI,A(k) represents a shift from the free solution, and ∆ v′(again) is the detuning of the level v′from the dissociation limit. This expression is valid for s-wave scattering and at low detunings. In the limit k→0, A(kR)→a, and the maximum of Rv′is found to be at ¯hδ≃kBT/2, so that Rv′≃ρλ3 De−1/2κ2/radicalBigg 2π2µ2 3¯h3∆v′/radicalbig kBT(Rv′−a)2.(94)This equation is similar to Eqs.(85)-(92). Notice that sinceλD∝1/√ T, the rate scales as 1 /Tand ∆−1/2 v′for small detuning. For lithium at 0.140 mK (correspond- ing to the Doppler temperature), assuming a laser inten- sity of 1000 W/cm2(so thatκ= 0.8×1010s−1: see [41] for details), and a detuning ∆ v′∼1 cm−1≃30 GHz (or 4.5×10−6hartree), we have Rv′= 135a0and λD= 1489a0= 7.875×10−6cm. For a density ρ= 1011 cm−3, this gives ρλ3 D= 4.88×10−5and, neglecting the scattering length a, one gets Rv′∼9.6×104s−1. If we scale the rate to T= 1 mK, we get 1 .3×104s−1, less than twice the value 7140 s−1obtained from Eq. (85) using the calculated value of αPA v′=86given above. No- tice that many assumptions are made in these estimates: nonetheless, expression (94) gives good order of magni- tude for the photoassociation rate for small detuning and low temperatures. Using the Doppler temperature as a typical temper- ature, and averaging the rate using a linewidth corre- sponding to 5 MHz [41], one ﬁnds typical rates for small detunings by scaling the numbers of Table II with the appropriate temperature, density, laser intensity, and de - tunings, according to Rv′≃I I0ρ ρ0T0 T/radicalbigg ∆0 ∆v′R. (95) Here,I0= 1000 W/cm2,ρ0= 1011cm−3, ∆0= 1 cm−1, andT0and¯Rare listed in Table II. Correspondingly, αPAscales as αPA v′≃T0 T/radicalbigg ∆0 ∆v′αPA. (96) The characteristic intensities should then scale with the square root of the detuning ∆ v′, so that we have Iv′=/radicalbigg ∆v′ ∆0I0. (97) The values of λ,ϕandαPAare listed in Table II. To compare the rates for the various alkali metals, it TABLE II: Approximate scaled photoabsorption rates Rand rate coeﬃcients αPAfor weakly bound molecular states. The values of R, and T0are from Pillet et al. [41],I0= 1000 W cm−2,ρ0= 1011cm−3, and ∆ 0= 1 cm−1. Atom T0R λ ϕ αPA mK 104s−1nm 1021cm−2cm5 Li 0.140 45 671 3.4 1 .3×10−27 Na 0.240 22 589 3.0 7 .3×10−28 K 0.140 25 766 3.9 6 .6×10−28 Rb 0.140 13 780 3.9 3 .3×10−28 Cs 0.125 10 852 4.3 2 .3×10−2820 TABLE III: Approximate photoassociation rates R, rate co- eﬃcients αPA, and characteristic intensities Iv′for the alkalis. The ﬁxed parameters are I0= 1000 W/cm2,ρ0= 1011cm−3, ∆0= 1 cm−1, and T=100 µK,. Also listed are the reference densities λ−3(in cm−3) and frequencies ǫR(in 2πkHz). Atom Rv′ αPA v′ Iv′ λ−3ǫR 104s−1cm5mW cm−2cm−32πkHz 7Li 63 1 .8×10−273.7 8 .21×101463.3 23Na 53 1 .7×10−270.47 1 .21×101525.0 39K 35 9 .2×10−280.18 5 .52×10148.72 87Rb 18 4 .6×10−280.069 5 .23×10143.77 133Cs 12 2 .9×10−280.039 4 .01×10142.07 is convenient to express them for the same parameters. AssumingI0= 1000 W/cm2,ρ= 1011cm−3,T= 100 µK, and ∆ 0= 1 cm−1, we obtain the values listed in Table III. The photoassociation rates vary between 1 .2× 105s−1(orαPA∼2.9×10−28cm5) for Cs and 6 .3× 105s−1(orαPA∼1.8×10−27cm5) for Li. From the expressions for Rv′, one expects the rates to scale like 1/2µ. If we were to multiply the rates by M, the mass number, we notice that, except for Li, the scaled rates indeed are similar. The variations left are due to slightly diﬀerent Rabi frequencies [41]. Finally, one has to be careful when using the values of Table III, in which the eﬀect of scattering lengths are not taken into account. These eﬀects can be signiﬁcant, like in the case of6Li,85Rb or133Cs, where large nega- tive scattering lengths induce larger rates. Also, at large r detunings, one probes deeper region of the excited elec- tronic state, and shorter distances of the lower state con- tinuum wave function, where the exact nodal structure will play an important role (see [17, 36, 37] and Fig. 7). As already noted, the values for the saturation inten- sity in Table III are to be construed as estimates only. Also, as they are, they apply to a very weakly bound molecular state (∆ v′= 1 cm−1). Such high-lying states are likely to be easily perturbed by atom-molecule colli- sions, so that in practice one might resort to more bound molecular states. Nonetheless, these saturation intensi- ties are remarkably low, occasionally much lower than our initial generic estimate of 10 Wcm−2[8, 14]. From the experimental viewpoint this is encouraging, as the requirements on laser intensity are greatly moderated. The ﬂip side is that the usable intensity appears to be limited by rogue photoassociation; for densities such that λ3ρ∼1, the maximum photoassociation Rabi frequency is of the order of the recoil frequency ǫR. For heavier alkalis the saturation intensities may indeed be low, but small recoil frequency and slow coherent photoassocia- tion are the prices to pay.D. Discussion of an experiment In the experiment of Wynar et al., Ref. [16], the au- thors studied photoassociation of a87Rb condensate in a two-color Raman conﬁguration. From our standpoint, the reported data fall into two categories. First, the width and shift of the two-photon resonance line was studied as a function of the intensities of the two lasers. We are going to use these measurements to estimate the bound-bound Rabi frequency. Second, the authors mea- sured the width and the shift of the same resonance line as a function of the density of the condensate. At low in- tensities, elastic atom-atom and atom-molecule collision s turn out to have a major eﬀect on the resonance parame- ters. However, these eﬀects were modeled quantitatively in Ref. [16], and one may then get at the quantities per- taining to photoassociation. We use this type of data to determine the characteristic frequency of coherent pho- toassociation. 1. Adapting the theory We ﬁrst cast our theoretical approach in a form that allows for direct juxtapositions with the analysis of ex- perimental data in Ref. [16]. We ignore elastic collisions because a comparison with Ref. [16] turns out to be possi- ble even without considering them explicitly, and inelas- tic collisions because their presence was not conclusively established in Ref. [16]. We begin by adding the spontaneous decay of the in- termediate state at the rate Γ sas a nonhermitian term in the Hamiltonian for the Λ system, Eq. (72). This gives H ¯h=δg†g+ (∆ +δ)b†b+...−iΓs 2b†b. (98) It is known in quantum optics that introducing an imagi- nary part to the energy of the decaying state gives correct results as long as the unstable state decays irreversibly only to states that are outside of the state space included in the model. We then repeat much of the analysis of Sec. VB 1 for the Hamiltonian (98), with a number of tricks and ap- proximations. First, we take the limit of large intermedi- ate detuning, \|∆\| ≫Γs,\|δ\|. Second, we assume that the bound-bound Rabi frequency χis much larger than the free-bound Rabi frequency Ω. This implies that in the es- timates of the line widths and decay rates, such as those following from Eq. (81), only the χ2terms need be kept. Third, we ignore light-induced atom-atom interactions. Fourth, we scale the the operators as before, a=√ Nα, etc., which brings out the photoassociation frequency Ω explicitly. Fifth, after deriving the equations of motion for the atomic operator αand ﬁnal-state molecule oper- atorγby adiabatic elimination of the intermediate-state operateβ, in the spirit of semiclassical approximation we replace the operators α,β, andγwithcnumbers. At this21 stage we have, in analogy with Eqs. (77) and (78), the equations ˙γ=−i/parenleftbigg δ−χ2 ∆/parenrightbigg γ−Γsχ2 2∆2γ+1 2iΩχ ∆α2,(99) ˙α=iΩχ ∆α∗γ. (100) To develop the rate approximation, we ﬁrst note that the probability that an atom belongs to the stable state g,Pg= 2\|γ\|2, satisﬁes the equation of motion ˙Pg=−Γsχ2 ∆2Pg+iΩχ ∆(C−C∗). (101) The “coherence” C=α2γ∗has the equation of motion ˙C=iΩχ ∆[PgPa−1 2P2 a]+/bracketleftbigg i/parenleftbigg δ−χ2 ∆/parenrightbigg −Γsχ2 2∆2/bracketrightbigg C,(102) where, in turn Pa=\|α\|2is the probability that an atom remains in the system unassociated. We could go on and derive a corresponding equation of motion for Pa. However, here we assume that Pa∼ 1, and that correspondingly Pg≪1. We solve for the coherenceCadiabatically by setting ˙C= 0, and insert the result into Eq. (101) to obtain a rate equation for the population of the stable molecular state g, ˙Pg=−Γsχ2 ∆2Pg+/bracketleftBig Ωχ ∆/bracketrightBig2/bracketleftBig Γsχ2 2∆2/bracketrightBig /bracketleftBig δ−χ2 ∆/bracketrightBig2 +/bracketleftBig Γsχ2 2∆2/bracketrightBig2P2 a.(103) This displays a shift of the ground state by ∆εL=χ2 ∆, (104) a linewidth γL 2=Γsχ2 2∆2, (105) and a corresponding direct decay of bound molecules at the rateγL. With the assumption Pg≪1 we have made the rate equation (103) essentially one way, i.e., ignored transi- tions from molecules back to the atoms. The semiclassi- cal approximation in general requires that there are many molecules in a quantum state, so that the molecules make a condensate. However, we believe that, by ignoring tran- sitions from molecules back to atoms, we have divorced the rate equation (103) from any coherence requirement for the molecules. As the experiments do not claim a molecular condensate, this is essential for the analysis that follows.2. Comparison with experiments Wynar et al., Ref. [16], discuss the light shift of the res- onance line. In their case the frequencies of the two lasers are quite close so that both of them cause line shifts and broadenings, but this is included in their analysis. Trans- lating back to our case with only one laser frequency on the bound-bound transition, the comparison between our formulation and Ref. [16] reads χ2 ∆=βI2 ∆1, (106) whereI2is the intensity (in W cm−2) of the bound-bound light, ∆ 1≡∆ = 2π×150 MHz is the intermediate detun- ing, andβ= 3.5×109m2W−1s−2is a parameter that we deduce from their Fig. 3a. This gives the approximate formula χ≃0.94/radicalbigg I2 Wcm−2×2πMHz. (107) Wynar et al., Ref. [16], also present an analysis of line shapes at low intensity. The rate coeﬃcient for two-photon photoassociation on resonance, K0= 9× 10−14cm3s−1, is one of the ﬁtted parameters. The reso- nance photoassociation rate from our Eq. (103) and the corresponding expression in Ref. [16], ignoring inelastic processes and with n≡ρ, boil down to Ω2 Γs=nK0. (108) Given the spontaneous decay rate of this molecular level, Γs= 12×2πMHz [16], and noting that their cited value ofK0was for the intensity of the photoassociation laser I1= 0.51 Wcm−2, we ﬁnd the scaling formula Ω≃5.8/radicalbigg ρ 1014cm−3I1 Wcm−2×2πkHz, (109) which gives the characteristic intensity Iv′= 0.08 Wcm−2. In the experiment, the binding energy of the primary photoassociated state was 23 cm−1. In contrast, for ∆v′= 1 cm−1, Table III gives the characteristic intensity 0.07 mWcm−2. The theoretical and experimental char- acteristic intensities diﬀer by three orders of magnitude, but they are also for diﬀerent binding energies. The dif- ference in characteristics intensities is no cause for con- cern, as we do not know at all how the detuning 23 cm−1 for Rb is related to the minima of the photoassociation rates like those shown in Fig. 7 for Li. 3. Reaching coherence Suppose that the density of the87Rb gas equals ρ= λ−3, a factor of two larger than quoted in Ref. [16], the22 laser intensities are I1=I2= 10 Wcm−2, typical val- ues in photoassociation experiments, and the interme- diate detuning is as in Ref. [16]. Then the two-photon Rabi frequency becomes Ω χ/∆ = 1 ×2πkHz, while the eﬀective linewidth is χ2Γs/2∆2= 2×2πkHz. For co- herent phenomena we need a Rabi frequency at least comparable to the linewidth, a condition that is not quite satisﬁed. But if one were simply to take the in- tensitiesI1= 100 Wcm−2for the photoassociating light andI2= 1 Wcm−2for the bound-bound light, Rabi fre- quency remains unchanged and linewidth goes down by a factor of 100. One is then in principle deep in the regime of coherent photoassociation. Also, the eﬀective Rabi frequency would be smaller than the recoil frequency, so that rogue photoassociation need not yet be a fatal prob- lem. On the other hand, eyeballing from Fig. 2 of Ref [16], the linewidth due to elastic atom-atom collisions would be of the order of 5 ×2πkHz, so elastic collisions would interfere with coherent photoassociation. Rabi oscilla- tions would be seriously impeded, rapid adiabatic pas- sage maybe less. One could compensate by lowering the density by two orders of magnitude and at the same time increasing the intensity of the photoassociating laser by another two orders of magnitude to keep the eﬀective Rabi frequency constant, but with lowering of the den- sity one would wind up in trouble with rogue photoasso- ciation. Experimentally, one can think of varying the intensity of the two lasers, the intermediate state, the intermediate detuning, and the density of the sample. The conditions one must watch out for are that eﬀective Rabi frequency be larger than the eﬀective damping rate and line broad- ening due to elastic (and inelastic) collisions, yet not so large as to cause excessive rogue photoassociation. If the parameters could be varied freely, within our physical model a solution is always possible. Unfortunately, one must live with some practical limitations on, say, laser intensities. The present experiment of Ref. [16] is tanta- lizingly close to coherent photoassociation, but to really get there may require a careful optimization of the exper- imental parameters and a solid understanding of what is technically feasible in a given experiment. We will not attempt to enter such discussions. VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS We have developed theory for coherent photoassocia- tion of a Bose-Einstein condensate of atoms, which typ- ically leads to a Bose-Einstein condensate of molecules. Phenomena analogous to coherent optical transients in few-level systems, such as Rabi ﬂopping and rapid adia- batic passage between atomic and molecular condensates are expected. Coherent phenomena depend on the Bose enhancement of the dipole moment matrix element, and cannot occur in a nondegenerate gas, at least not in the thermodynamic limit. Bose-Einstein condensation andphotoassociation are both currently front-line research and the marriage thereof might still be a technological challenge, but coherent optical transients in photoassoci - ation should eventually be feasible in experiments. Acknowledgments This work is supported in part by the NSF, Grant No. PHY-9801888, and by NASA, Grant No. NAG8- 1428. Additional support was provided by the Connecti- cut Space Grant College Consortium. One of us [JJ] thanks S´ andor Varr´ o for interesting discussions; in par- ticular, for pointing out Ref. [19]. APPENDIX A: DIPOLE MATRIX ELEMENT In our bare-bones example we consider the situation in which we either have one molecule at rest and no atoms, or no molecule and two atoms in states kand−k. Then the relative momentum becomes ¯ hk. This peculiarity, and also the reason for the factor1 2in Eq. (14), is because the relative momentum for two entities with momenta p1 andp2should be deﬁned as1 2(p1−p2) to make it the conjugate of the usual relative position r1−r2. We thus have the possible state vectors \|ψ∝an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftBigg βb†+/summationdisplay kαka† ka† −k/parenrightBigg \|0∝an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (A1) whereβandαkare complex amplitudes to be deter- mined, and \|0∝an}b∇acket∇i}htstands for the vacuum of atoms and molecules. The states for αkandα−kare the same, so the sum over kruns only over half of the possible kval- ues; say, those with kx>0. Following Ref. [8], we write the time dependent Schr¨ odinger equation from the Hamiltonian (12) in terms of the coeﬃcients βandαk, assuming a plane wave of light. In order to avoid an inessential complication, we ignore photon recoil and simply set q= 0. The result is ˙αk=−i/parenleftbigg¯hk2 2µ−δ0/parenrightbigg αk+id∗·E∗ 2¯hβ, (A2) ˙β=i/summationdisplay kd·E 2¯hαk. (A3) The QC approach discussed in Refs. [6] and [7] dis- plays precisely the same structure, evidently identifying d·E/2¯has the QC Rabi frequency κof those papers. There is a catch, however. Because of the Bose- Einstein statistics, states with the relative momenta for two atoms kand−kare the same, so the density of states for the relative motion is half of what it was for Maxwell- Boltzmann atoms. To obtain the same photodissociation rate, we therefore have to make the matrix element a fac- tor of√ 2 larger than in the case of distinguishable atoms.23 This is the√ 2 in Eq. (14). The rate of photodissocia- tion is proportional to the square of the matrix element and picks up a factor of two, which compensates for the missing half of phase space density. The second-quantized Hamiltonian is chosen so that it gives the right photodissociation rate. What we did not fully realize in Ref. [8] is that the same factor of√ 2 also leads to twice the photoassociation rate that one would obtain for Maxwell-Boltzmann atoms, given the Franck-Condon factor from the standard calculations or as deduced from the photodissociation rate. It appears that in the literature the rate for s-wave photoassocia- tion is usually calculated low by a factor of two. Be- sides, by a simple extension of the statistics arguments, p-wave photoassociation should vanish for bosons. Are these problems? We think not. In photoassociation experiments no par- ticular care is usually taken to polarize the atoms. They are not all in the same internal state, and therefore not all photoassociation events are between indistinguishabl e atoms. This should reduce the factor-of-two boson en- hancement of the photoassociation rate for even partial waves, and call forth odd partial waves. The remaining discrepancies with the conventional calculations may well be within experimental and theoretical uncertainties. It would be of some interest to investigate photoassoci- ation of a polarized low-temperature gas experimentally. We believe that the statistics eﬀects are real, and should be observable. After all, few colleagues seem to have a problem with the assertion that there are no s-wave col- lisions for polarized fermions. Photoassociation experi- ments in a polarized gas should make an interesting test of our phenomenological Hamiltonian. APPENDIX B: KERNEL FOR PHOTOASSOCIATION IN FIELD THEORY The process we followed in the main text in deriving the integral kernel d(r) [as in, e.g., Eq. (23)] was a phe- nomenological mix between formally pure ﬁeld theory and collisional physics. In fact, to obtain the dipole matrix elements dkk′in Eq. (12), we carry out an integral of the form dkk′≡d(k−k′) =d/integraldisplay d3r¯ψ∗(r)¯φk−k′(r),(B1) where ¯ψis the bound-state molecular wave function and ¯φk−k′describes the state of two atoms with the relative momentum ¯ h(k−k′). Now, in the transformation to ﬁeld theory (18) we used plane waves as the wave functionsfor states with a given wave vector. In the matrix ele- ment (B1) we should correspondingly use plane waves to describe the relative motion, as in ¯φk−k′(r) =1√ Vei(k−k′)·r. (B2) However, in our derivation we did not not use plane waves, but distorted plane waves that take into ac- count atom-atom interactions, and only asymptotically (at large distances) corresponds to the relative momen- tumk−k′. This makes a diﬀerence. For instance, if the matrix element (B1) is computed using pure plane waves, the ﬁnal photoassociation kernel reads d(r) =√ 2d¯ψ∗(r), (B3) instead of something akin to (22). Depending on the value of the scattering length, there could be a sub- stantial diﬀerence in the overall numerical factor also in the contact-interaction form for atom-molecule coupling, Eq. (24). The question is, which method is “correct”; pure or distorted plane waves? First of all, atoms dointeract, which in general will have an eﬀect on photoassociation. One who wishes to analyze photoassociation quantitatively will have to take atom-atom interactions into account. A ﬁeld the- orist pursuing pure plane waves would have to consider atom-atom interactions explicitly, and work out the con- sequences in photoassociation ab initio . This is probably a major chore. Our hope is that, with our distorted-plane wave trickery, we have phenomenologically captured most of the eﬀect of atom-atom interactions on photoassocia- tion. On the other hand, if we use the distorted plane waves to calculate the photoassociation matrix element and in addition introduce a contact interaction model for atoms as in (83), the suspicion arises that we are double- counting atom-atom interactions. Further approxima- tions, such as the contact-interaction form for photoas- sociation or classical ﬁeld theory, could either exacerbat e or ameliorate the double-counting. Disentangling atom-atom interactions and photoasso- ciation might make an interesting theoretical exercise, but we do not attempt it in this paper. Instead, we pro- ceed with a model that allows for both distorted-plane wave matrix elements for photoassociation, and an ex- plicit atom-atom interaction. In this way, we at least get the limiting cases of photoassociation in a dilute gas and atom-atom interactions in the absence of photoassocia- tion basically right with little eﬀor [1] H. R. Thorsheim, J. Weiner, and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2420 (1987); R. Napolitano, J. Weiner, C. J. Williams, and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1352(1994); P. D. Lett, P. S. Julienne, and W. D. Phillips, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 423 (1995). [2] M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E.24 Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995); K. B. Davis, M. -O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995); C. C. Bradley, C. A. Sackett, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 985 (1997). [3] E. R. I. Abraham, W. I. McAlexander, C. A. Sacket, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1315 (1995); E. Tiesinga, C. J. Williams, P. S. Julienne, K. M. Jones, P. D. Lett, and W. D. Phillips, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 101, 505 (1996); C. C. Tsai, R. S. Freeland, J. M. Vogels, H. M. J. M. Boestan, B. J. Verhaar, and D. J. Heinzen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1245 (1997). [4] K. Burnett, P. S. Julienne, and K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1416 (1997). [5] P. S. Julienne, K. Burnett, Y. B. Band, and W. C. Stwal- ley, Phys. Rev. A 58, R797 (1998). [6] J. Javanainen and M. Mackie, Phys. Rev. A 58, R789 (1998). [7] M. Mackie and J. Javanainen, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3174 (1999). [8] J. Javanainen and M. Mackie, Phys. Rev. A 59, R3186 (1999). [9] P. D. Drummond, K. V. Kheruntsyan, and H. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3055 (1998). [10] P. Tommasini, E. Timmermans, M. Hussein, and A. Ker- man; LANL preprint archive cond-mat/9804015. [11] E. Timmermans, P. Tommasini, R. Cˆ ot´ e, M. Hussein, and A. Kerman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2691 (1999). [12] F. A. van Abeelen and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1550 (1999). [13] M. Mackie, R. Kowalski, and J. Javanainen, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3803 (2000). [14] J. Javanainen and M. Ko˘ strun, Optics Express 5, 188 (1999). [15] M. Mackie and J. Javanainen, J. Mod. Opt. xx, yyyy (2000). [16] R. Wynar, R. S. Freeland, D. J. Han, C. Ryu, and D. J. Heinzen, Science 287, 1016 (2000). [17] R. Cˆ ot´ e, A. Dalgarno, Y. Sun, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3581 (1995) [18] E. R. I. Abraham, W. I. McAlexander, J. M. Gerton, R. G. Hulet, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and A. Dalgarno, Phys. Rev. A 53, R3173 (1996). [19] The “well-known” universality of the mode density, ind e- pendently of the shape of the quantization volume, goes back at least to the work of Hermann Weyl in the be- ginning of the 20th century. See Selecta Hermann Weyl(Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1956), pp. 59–110. [20] J. Javanainen and M. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. A 60, 2351 (1999). [21] D. F. Walls and C. T. Tindle, J. Phys. A 5, 534 (1972). [22] G. Drobny and I. Jex, Phys. Rev. A 45, 1816 (1992). [23] H. He, M. J. Werner, and P. D. Drummond, Phys. Rev. E54, 896 (1996). [24] S. Wolfram, The Mathematica Book , 3rd Ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996). [25] S. Trillo and P. Ferro, Optics Lett. 20, 438 (1995). [26] H. He, P. D. Drummond, and B. A. Malomed, Optics. Comm. 123(1996). [27] M. D. Fleck and J. A. Feit, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 2578 (1984); A. D. Bandrauk and H. Shen, Can. J. Chem. 70, 555 (1992). [28] D. V. Skryabin and W. J. Firth, Optics Comm. 148, 79 (1998). [29] K. Rzazewski, M. Lewenstein, and J. H. Eberly, J. Phys. B15, L661 (1982). [30] D. Heinzen and W. Ketterle (unpublished) have devel- oped the estimate (71) from completely diﬀerent argu- ments. [31] P. O. Fedichev, Yu. Kagan, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. T. M. Walraven, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2913 (1996). [32] J. L. Bohn and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. A 54, R4637 (1996). [33] J. L. Bohn and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. A 60, 414 (1999). [34] J. Javanainen, J. Phys. B 16, 1343 (1983); Optics Com- mun.46, 175 (1983); Physica Scripta 31, 57 (1985). [35] See J. Weiner, V.S. Bagnato, S. Zilio, and P.S. Julienne , Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1 (1999), and references therein. [36] R. Cˆ ot´ e and A. Dalgarno, Phys. Rev. A 58, 498 (1998). [37] R. Cˆ ot´ e and A. Dalgarno, J. Mol. Spect. 195, 236 (1999). [38] The rate coeﬃcients listed in Refs. [36, 37] must be mul- tiplied by (2 π)5, and we do not assume any hyperﬁne mixing (neglect ω0in [36, 37]). [39] We determined the binding energy of level v′= 58 of7Li triplet state to be 3666 ±2 GHz by ﬁtting the known levels, and it was recently measured by R.G. Hulet and co-workers to be 3667 GHz. [40] P.S. Julienne, J. Res. Natl. Stand. Technol. 101, 487 (1996); F. Masnou-Seeuws, O. Dulieu, A. Crubellier, and P. Pillet (private communication). [41] P. Pillet, A. Crubellier, A. Bleton, O. Dulieu, P. Nos- baum, I. Mourachko, and F. Masnou-Seeuws, J. Phys. B 30, 2801 (1997).
arXiv:physics/0006067v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 26 Jun 2000Radial Viscous Flow between Two Parallel Annular Plates Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princet on, NJ 08544 (June 25, 2000) 1 Problem Deduce the velocity distribution of steady ﬂow of an incompr essible ﬂuid of density ρand viscosity ηbetween two parallel, coaxial annular plates of inner radii r1, outer radii r2and separation hwhen pressure diﬀerence ∆ Pis applied between the inner and outer radii. As an exact solution of the Navier-Stokes equation appears t o be diﬃcult, it suﬃces to give an approximate solution assuming that the velocity is p urely radial, v=v(r, z)ˆr, in a cylindrical coordinate system ( r, φ, z) whose zaxis coincides with that of the two annuli. Deduce a condition for validity of the approximation. This problem arises, for example, in considerations of a rot ary joint between two sections of a pipe. Here, we ignore the extra complication of the eﬀect of the rotation of one of the annuli on the ﬂuid ﬂow. 2 Solution For an incompressible ﬂuid, the velocity distribution obey s the continuity equation ∇ ·v= 0, (1) in which case the Navier-Stokes equation for steady, viscou s ﬂow is ρ(v· ∇)v=−∇P+η∇2v. (2) There are only three examples in which analytic solutions to this equation have been obtained when the nonlinear term ( v· ∇)vis nonvanishing [1]. We ﬁrst review the simpler case of two-dimensional ﬂow betwe en parallel plates in sec. 2.1, and then take up the case of radial ﬂow in sec. 2.2. We will ﬁnd a n analytic solution to the nonlinear Navier-Stokes equation (2) for radial ﬂow, but th is solution cannot satisfy the the boundary conditions, v(z= 0) = 0 = v(z=h), (3) that the ﬂow velocity vanish next to the plates. However, in t he linear approximation to eq. (2) we obtain an analytic form for the radial ﬂow between t wo annular plates. 2.1 Two-Dimensional Flow between Parallel Plates For guidance, we recall that an analytic solution is readily obtained for the related problem of two-dimensional viscous ﬂow between two parallel plates . For example, suppose that the plates are at the planes z= 0 and z=h, and that the ﬂow is in the xdirection, i.e., 1v=v(x, z)ˆx. The equation of continuity (1) then tells us that ∂v/∂x = 0, so that the velocity is a function of zonly, v=v(z)ˆx. (4) Thezcomponent of the Navier-Stokes equation (2) reduces to ∂P/∂z = 0, so that the pressure is a function of xonly. The xcomponent of eq. (2) is ∂P(x) ∂x=η∂2v(z) ∂z2. (5) Since the lefthand side is a function of x, and the righthand side is a function of z, equation (5) can be satisﬁed only if both sides are constant. Supposin g that the pressure decreases with increasing x, we write −∂P ∂x= constant =∆P ∆x>0. (6) Using the boundary conditions (3), we quickly ﬁnd that v(z) =∆P ∆xz(h−z) 2η= 6¯vz h/parenleftbigg 1−z h/parenrightbigg , (7) where the average velocity ¯ vis given by ¯v=1 h/integraldisplayh 0v(z)dz=∆P ∆xh2 12η. (8) 2.2 Radial Flow between Parallel Annular Plates Returning to the problem of radial ﬂow between two annular pl ates, we seek a solution in which the velocity is purely radial, v=v(r, z)ˆr. The continuity equation (1) for this hypothesis tells us that 1 r∂(rv) ∂r= 0, (9) so that v=f(z) rˆr. (10) Following the example of two-dimensional ﬂow between paral lel plates, we expect a parabolic proﬁle in zas in eq. (7), f(z)∝z(h−z), (11) which satisﬁes the boundary conditions (3). Using the trial solution (10), the zcomponent of the Navier-Stokes equation (2) again tells us that the pressure must be independent of z:P=P(r). The radial component of eq. (2) yields the nonlinear form ηr2d2f dz2+ρf2=r3dP dr. (12) 2The hoped-for separation of this equation can only be achiev ed iff(z) =Fis constant, which requires the pressure proﬁle to be P(r) =A−ρF2/2r2. The boundary conditions (3) cannot be satisﬁed by this solution. Further, this solution exists only for the case that the pressure is increasing with increasing radius. The ﬂuid ﬂow must be then be inward, so the constant Fmust be negative. The Navier-Stokes equation is not time-re versal invariant due to the dissipation of energy associated with the viscosity, and so reversing the velocity of a solution does not, in general, lead to another solution. While we have obtained an analytic solution to the nonlinear Navier-Stokes equation (2), it is not a solution to the problem of radial ﬂow between two an nuli. It is hard to imagine a physical problem involving steady, radially inward ﬂow of a long tube of ﬂuid, to which the solution could apply. Instead of an exact solution, we are led to seek an approximat e solution in which the nonlinear term f2of eq. (12) can be ignored. In this case, the diﬀerential equa tion takes the separable form d2f dz2=r ηdP dr= constant . (13) Following eq. (7) we write the solution for fthat satisﬁes the boundary conditions (3) as f(z) = 6¯fz h/parenleftbigg 1−z h/parenrightbigg , (14) where ¯fis the average of f(z) over the interval 0 ≤z≤h. The part of eq. (13) that describes the pressure leads to the solution P(r) =P1lnr2/r+P2lnr/r1 lnr2/r1, (15) where Pi=P(ri). Plugging the solutions (14) and (15) back into eq. (13), we ﬁnd that ¯f=h2∆P 12ηlnr2/r1, (16) where ∆ P=P1−P2. Hence, the ﬂow velocity is v(r, z) =z(h−z)∆P 2ηrlnr2/r1ˆr, (17) whose average with respect to zis ¯v(r) =¯f/r. As with all solutions to the linearized Navier-Stokes equation, the velocity is independent of the density. For the approximate solution (17) to be valid, the term f2≈¯f2must be small in eq. (12), which requires ρh4∆P 144η2r2 1lnr2/r1≪1. (18) When this condition is not satisﬁed, the solution must inclu de velocity components in the zdirection that are signiﬁcant near the inner and outer radii , while the ﬂow pattern at intermediate radii could be reasonably well described by eq . (17). If one of the annuli is rotating at angular velocity ω, the radial ﬂow velocity should still be given approximately by eq. (17) so long as ωr2<∼¯v(r2) =¯f/r2. 33 References [1] L. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics , 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987), chap. 2. 4
arXiv:physics/0006068v1 [physics.space-ph] 27 Jun 20001 ENHANCED PITCH ANGLE DIFFUSION DUE TO ELECTRON-WHISTLER INTERACTIONS DURING DISTURBED TIMES W. Wykes, S. C. Chapman, and G. Rowlands Space and Astrophysics Group, University of Warwick, Coven try, UK ABSTRACT During periods of increased magnetospheric activ- ity, whistler wave emissions have been observed with increased wave amplitudes. We consider a pitch an- gle diﬀusion mechanism that is shown to scale with whistler wave amplitude and hence is ’switched on’ during these periods of intense activity. We consider the interaction between relativistic elec- trons and two oppositely directed, parallel propa- gating whistler mode waves. We show that for in- tense whistlers this process is stochastic and results in strong electron pitch angle diﬀusion. We show that the interaction is rapid, occur on timescales of the order of tens of electron gyrope- riods and that the interaction is sensitive to wave amplitude, wave frequency and electron energy. Key words: Electron, Whistler, Substorms, Diﬀu- sion. 1. INTRODUCTION Electron whistler interactions have long been consid- ered as a mechanism for pitch angle scattering. Gy- roresonance processes with near-parallel propagating waves (e.g. Kennel and Petschek (1966), Lyons and Williams (1984)) have been shown to produce pitch angle diﬀusion for electrons that are at resonance with a series of whistler waves (see Gendrin (1981)). We generalize resonant diﬀusion to include all phase space dynamics, i.e. as well as considering the reso- nant diﬀusion of trapped electrons we consider diﬀu- sion of untrapped electrons (we refer to this process as ‘oﬀ-resonance’ diﬀusion). Therefore we maximize the area in phase space contributing to pitch angle diﬀusion. The underlying dynamics of the interaction between electrons and a single whistler are inherently sim- ple, as demonstrated by Laird (1972) who derived the Hamiltonian for relativistic electrons interacting with a whistler with a single wave number. However,for a single monochromatic whistler the process is not stochastic. We introduce stochasticity by including an identical, oppositely directed whistler mode wave. We initially consider a simpliﬁed system consisting of monochromatic whistlers in order to understand the underlying behaviour. This treatment is then extended to consider whistler wave packets, i.e. a group of waves with a range of frequencies. We derive approximate equations in the limit of low whistler wave amplitudes and consider the degree of pitch angle diﬀusion for waves of diﬀerent frequencies and bandwidths and for electrons of diﬀerent ener- gies. 2. EQUATIONS OF MOTION We derive full relativistic equations of motion and approximate them in the limit of low wave ampli- tudes, for the case of monochromatic whistlers and wave packets. We normalize time to the electron gyrofrequency Ω e=eB0/me, (whereB0is the back- ground magnetic ﬁeld), the wave amplitude is nor- malized to the background magnetic ﬁeld, wave fre- quency is normalized to the gyrofrequency and we normalize the electron velocity to the phase velocity of the waves, given by the electron dispersion relation (ignoring ion eﬀects): k2c2 ω2= 1−ω2 pe ω(ω−Ωe)(1) whereωpeis the plasma oscillation frequency. Elec- trons can become trapped by either of the two whistlers if they are traveling close to the resonance velocity, given by: ω−k·vr=nΩe/γ (2) wherenis an integer and γ= (1−v2/c2)−1/2is the relativistic factor.2 Figure 1. Stroboscopic surface of section plots for the mono chromatic whistler interaction. For quiet time wave amplitudes, panel a), all trajectories are regular, with re sonances given by the resonance condition Equation (2). For high wave amplitudes observed during disturbed times, p anels b), phase space is dominated by stochastic trajectories with regular trajectories conﬁned to close to the resonances. The stochastic region is bounded above and below by the ﬁrst regular, untrapped, trajectories away from resonance, therefore there is a limit on the diﬀusion of electrons in phase space. 2.1. Monochromatic Whistlers In the limit of low wave amplitudes the full equations of motion can be reduced to: d2x dt2=2bv⊥0 γ0sin [(1/γ0−ω)t]cos[kx] (3) wherexis the distance along the background mag- netic ﬁeld, bis the normalized wave amplitude, v⊥0is the initial perpendicular velocity and γ0= 1//radicalbig (1−v⊥2 0/c2). 2.2. Wave Packet Approximation Instead of a pair of waves it is more realistic to con- sider the interaction of a wave packet, ie a small group of waves with a range of wave frequencies and wave numbers. We assume the wave amplitude is non-zero over wave frequency range ∆ ω: b(ω) =/braceleftBigg0 :ω<ω 0−∆ω/2 b:ω0−∆ω/2<ω<ω 0+ ∆ω/2 0 :ω>ω 0+ ∆ω(4) whereω0is the central wave frequency of the wave packet. Integrating the monochromatic ehistler equation (3) over the frequency range ∆ ωgives the following wave packet equation:d2x dt2= Ωe2bv⊥0 γ0sin/bracketleftbigg (1 γ0−ω)t+k0x/bracketrightbiggsin[ (t−βx) ∆ω/2] (t−βx) + Ωe2bv⊥0 γ0sin/bracketleftbigg (1 γ0−ω)t−k0x/bracketrightbiggsin[ (t+βx) ∆ω/2] (t+βx)(5) where 1/β=dω/dk is the group velocity of the waves. The wave packet equation (5) yields the monochromatic whistler equation (3) in the limit ∆ω→0, with amplitude b′=bΩe∆ω. 3. NUMERICAL RESULTS The monochromatic and wave packet equations were solved numerically using a variable order, variable stepsize diﬀerential equation integrator. We con- sider physical parameters for the terrestrial magne- tosphere at L= 6: gyrofrequency, Ω e= 25.3kHz, plasma frequency, ωpe= 184kHz, background mag- netic ﬁeld, B0= 144nTand wave amplitude Bω= 0.5pT, giving a normalized wave amplitude, con- sistent with quiet times in the terrestrial magneto- sphere,b= 10−5(see for example Nagano et al. (1996), Parrot (1994) and Summers and Ma (2000)). The phase plots in Figure 1 are comprised of stro- boscopic surfaces of section (Benettin et al., 1976) to sample the full electron phase space. The initial parallel velocity was varied over the range [ −vr,vr], wherevris the resonance velocity, given by the res- onance condition, (2), for n= 1. All electrons were3 given a constant initial perpendicular velocity, with v⊥≈20vras it was found that a high velocity anisotropy was required for stochasticity. In Figure 1 we plot parallel velocity v/bardbl=dx/dt against phase angle ψ, whereψis the angle between whistler propagating in a positive direction along the background ﬁeld and the perpendicular veloc- ity,v⊥. In panel a) we consider a whistler wave amplitude consistent with quiet times ( b= 10−5) all trajectoriesin phase space are regular. There is little change in v/bardbland hence only weak pitch an- gle diﬀusion. As the wave amplitude is increased, stochastic trajectories are introduced, as the regular trajectories between the two resonances are progres- sively broken down. In panel b) we consider the case of intense whistler wave activity during substorms (b= 10−3, see for example Parrot (1994) and Nagano et al. (1996)). The stochastic region grows to en- compass the resonances as the wave amplitude is in- creased. Regular trajectories are conﬁned to KAM surfaces (near-integrable trajectories with an approx- imate constant of the motion (Tabor, 1989)). The stochastic region is bounded by the ﬁrst untrapped (regular) trajectories away from the resonances, thus there is a limit on diﬀusion in phase space. As well as resonant diﬀusion of trapped electrons, there is diﬀusion of untrapped electrons throughout the stochastic region of phase space. Since, for suﬃ- cient wave amplitudes, the stochastic region can en- compass the resonances, the diﬀusion of untrapped electrons, which we refer to as ‘oﬀ-resonance’ diﬀu- sion, may be enhanced over resonant diﬀusion. In ad- dition we achieve pitch angle diﬀusion from a larger area of phase space. Due to the time dependent nature of the wave packet equation (5) it is not possible to construct phase dia- grams as in Figure 1 for the monochromatic whistler case. Instead we can consider the dynamics of single electrons. In Figure 2 we show a single trajectory so- lution of the wave packet equation (5), for quiet time wave amplitudes and wide (∆ ω= Ω e/50 = 500Hz) and narrow (∆ ω= Ω e/500 = 50 Hz) whistler wave packets (see for example Carpenter and Sulic (1988)). We consider the change in pitch angle from an initial pitch angle of 90◦. For narrow wave packets there is little change in pitch angle and the trajec- tory is regular. For wide wave packets the trajec- tory is stochastic with a large change in pitch angle (∆α∼25◦) occuring within a few tens of electron gyroperiods ( ∼10ms). We can now achieve strong pitch angle diﬀusion for wave amplitudes consistent with the quiet time magnetosphere. 4. PITCH ANGLE SCATTERING Using the wave packet equation (5) with quiet time whistlers (b= 10−5) and a relatively wide band whistler (∆ ω= Ω e/50 = 500Hz, (Carpenter and Sulic, 1988)), we can estimate the degree of pitch angle scattering. In Figures 3 and 4 we estimate the Figure 2. Change in pitch angle from an initial pitch angle of 90◦, for quiet time wave amplitudes (b= 10−5) and narrow and wide whistler wave pack- ets. For narrow wave packets there is little change in pitch angle. For wide wave packets there is a large change in pitch angle ( ∆α∼25◦) occuring within a few tens of electron gyroperiods ( ∼10ms), hence the interaction is rapid. Changes in pitch angle attenu- ate with time and the pitch angle reaches a constant value. Figure 3. Log change in pitch angle, (log10\|1+∆α\|), as a function of wave frequency, ω, and initial pitch angle,α0, for 10 keV electrons ( v= 0.2c) and quiet time (low amplitude),wide band whistler wave packets (∆ω= Ω e/50). For high to moderate initial pitch angles (α0= 50◦−90◦) there is a change in pitch angle of up to 40◦. For low pitch angles ( α0= 5◦− 10◦) the change in pitch angle is of the order of a few degrees.4 log change in pitch angle, (log10\|1+∆α\|), as a func- tion of wave frequency, ω, and initial pitch angle, α0. We consider the interaction between 10 keVelectrons in Figure 3 (100 keVelectrons in Figure 4) and wide band whistlers (∆ ω=ωe/50). For high to moder- ate initial pitch angles ( α0= 50◦−90◦) there is a change in pitch angle of up to 40◦. For low pitch angles (α0= 5◦−10◦) the change in pitch angle is of the order of a few degrees. In Figure 4 we see a sim- ilar degree of diﬀusion except that lower frequency whistler wave packets are required. Figure 4. As for Figure 3 except for 100 keV elec- trons (v= 0.5c). Pitch angle scattering from a few degrees up to 40◦occurs although lower frequency whistler wave packets are required. 5. DISCUSSION We have considered electron-whistler wave particle interactions to investigate diﬀusion over all phase space, to include both resonant and ‘oﬀ-resonance’ diﬀusion. We have considered a simpliﬁed interac- tion with monochromatic whistler wave to under- stand the underlying behaviour and have shown that the presence of the second whistler wave introduces stochastic eﬀects into the system. For wave ampli- tudes consistent with disturbed times we have shown that ‘oﬀ-resonance’ diﬀusion occurs and that reso- nant diﬀusion is unchanged. We have considered a more realistic case of whistler wave packets and have shown that for relatively wide band whistler wave packets strong pitch angle dif- fusion occurs for wave amplitudes consistent with quiet, undisturbed, times. For high initial pitch an- gles we estimate a change in pitch angle of up to 40◦, while for low pitch angles a change of a few degrees is estimated. The eﬀectiveness in scattering electrons of diﬀerent energies is dependent on the wave frequency. Elec- trons with low energies (10 keV) are readily scattered by waves of around half the electron gyrofrequency,while electrons at higher energies (100 keV) are scat- tered by lower frequency wave ( ω∼Ωe/10).MeV electrons would require extremely low frequency waves for eﬃcient scattering, hence our mechanism is most eﬃcient for electrons in the 10 −100keV range. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge PPARC for the funding of this work. REFERENCES Benettin G., L. Galgani, J. M. Strelcyn. Kolmogorov entropy and numerical experiments. Physica A, 14, 2338, 1976. Carpenter D. L., and D. M. Sulic. Ducted whistler propagation outside the plasmapause. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 9731, 1988. Gendrin R. General Relations between wave ampliﬁ- cation and particle diﬀusion in a magnetoplasma. Rev. Geophys., 19, 171, 1981. Kennel C. F. and H. E. Petschek. Limit on stably trapped particle ﬂuxes. J. Geophys. Res., 71, 1, 1966. Laird M. J. Cyclotron resonance in an inhomoge- neous plamsa. J. Plasma Physics, 8, 255, 1972. Lyon L. R. and Williams, D. J. Quantitative Aspects of Magnetospheric Physics. D. Reidel, Hingham, Mass., 1984. Nagano I., S. Yagitani, H. Kojima, H. Matsumoto. Analysis of Wave Normal and Poynting Vectors of the Chorus Emissions Observed by GEOTAIL. J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 48, 299, 1996 Parrot M. and C. A. Gaye. A statistical survey of ELF waves in geostationary orbit. GRL 21, 2463, 1994. Summers D. and C. Ma. A model for generating rel- ativistic electrons in the Earth’s inner magneto- sphere based on gyroresonant wave-particle inter- actions. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2625, 2000. Tabor M. Chaos and integrability in nonlinear dy- namics - an introduction. New York, Chichester: Wiley, 1989.
arXiv:physics/0006069v1 [physics.chem-ph] 27 Jun 2000On the integration accuracy in molecular density functiona l theory calculations using Gaussian basis sets Jan M.L. Martin* Department of Organic Chemistry, B Kimmelman Building, Roo m 262, Weizmann Institute of Science, IL-76100 Reh .ovot, Israel. E-mail:comartin@wicc.weizmann.ac.il Charles W. Bauschlicher, Jr.* Space Technology Division, Mail Stop 230-3, NASA Ames Resea rch Center, Moﬀett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA Alessandra Ricca ELORET, Mail Stop 230-3, NASA Ames Research Center, Moﬀett F ield, CA 94035-1000, USA (Comput. Phys. Commun. MS PTA019; Received February 14, 2000; Accepted May 5, 2000) Abstract The sensitivity of computed DFT (Density Functional Theory ) molecular properties (including energetics, geometries, vibration al frequencies, and in- frared intensities) to the radial and angular numerical int egration grid meshes, as well as to the partitioning scheme, is discussed for a numb er of molecules using the Gaussian 98 program system. Problems with typical production grid sizes are particularly acute for third-row transition metal systems, but may still result in qualitatively incorrect results for a mo lecule as simple as CCH. Practical recommendations are made with respect to gri d choices for the energy(+gradient) steps, as well as for the solution of t he CPKS (Coupled Perturbed Kohn-Sham) equations. PACS: 02.60.Jh, 31.15.Ew, 82.20.Wt Typeset using REVT EX 1I. INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Density Functional Theory (DFT) [1,2] has in recent years be come both a powerful and a very commonly used tool for studying molecular electronic s tructure. In addition to usually reliable energetics, the availability of analytical ﬁrst a nd second derivatives for the DFT approaches allows for easy calculation of geometric struct ure and vibrational frequencies. The rate-determining step in molecular DFT calculations us ing Gaussian basis sets is usually the evaluation of various integrals over the exchan ge-correlation functional and its geometric derivatives. In practice the three-dimensional numerical integration is carried out as a weighted sum of three-dimensional integrations in pola r coordinates centered on atoms A: /integraldisplay F(r)dτ=atoms/summationdisplay Agrid/summationdisplay gwgApA(rg)F(rgA) (1) in which the rgandwgare numerical quadrature abscissae and weights, respectiv ely, and the partitioning function pAsatisﬁes/summationtext ApA(r) = 1 for all values of r. In other words, pA acts as a ‘fader function’ between grids centered on diﬀeren t atoms. Quite separate from issues involving the basis set and mathe matical form of the exchange- correlation functional, which determine the accuracy of the calculation, the choice of atomic integration grid and partitioning can have a profound impac t on its numerical precision (together with trivial parameters like convergence criter ia). Especially since an increasing proportion of users of quantum chemical software in general — and DFT methods in partic- ular — are experimental chemists without prior background i n electronic structure theory, the tendency exists to simply rely on the built-in defaults o f various codes. In the present paper, we shall report a number of problems whi ch may arise in this fashion. Because of its great popularity and widespread use , our discussion will focus on the Gaussian 98 [3] program system. We wish to emphasize, howeve r, that the issues raised in the present work could arise with other DFT codes. We note tha t some codes try to minimize possible numerical problems by the use of large default inte gration grids and/or by variation of the grid mesh with the atom type. While the use of very large grids certainly avoids 2numerical problems, it can lead to prohibitively expensive calculations for larger systems. Therefore, it is of interest to ﬁnd the smallest grid that wil l yield precise results for molecular properties. Before proceeding to discuss our results, we shall ﬁrst brie ﬂy review some relevant math- ematical aspects. II. MATHEMATICAL BACKGROUND The atomic integration grid is built up naturally as the dire ct product of radial and angular grids: /summationdisplay gwgF(rg) =/summationdisplay a/summationdisplay bwawbF(ra, θb, φb) (2) The angular grid itself can be either a direct product of appr opriate one-dimensional Gauss quadrature grids (e.g., Gauss-Legendre or Gauss-Chebyshe v), or (more eﬃciently) can be a two-dimensional Lebedev grid [4] which exactly integrate s spherical harmonics up to a certain order. (In order to integrate spherical harmonics u p to order Lexactly, the direct product of grids with ( L+ 1)/2 abscissae in θandL+ 1 abscissae in φrequires ( L+ 1)2/2 angular quadrature points, compared to approximately ( L+ 1)2/3 for the corresponding Lebedev grid [5].) The radial grids discussed in the present paper are all of the Murray-Handy-Laming (MHL) variety [6] (following ideas ﬁrst proposed by Boys and Handy [7]), in which the inﬁnite interval r= [0,∞] is remapped onto the ﬁnite interval q= [0,1] by means of the change of variable r=α(q/(1−q))m; the integration in qis then approximated by Euler- Maclaurin summation. (The latter is facilitated by the fact that/parenleftBig dnr dqn/parenrightBig vanishes at q= 1 for alln, and at q= 0 up to n= 3m−1 inclusive.) Empirically, m=2 is found to yield the best results [6], and αshould be dependent on the atomic radius for best results. Th e following working equations arise for abscissae and weights: ri=R(i/(N+ 1−i))2(3) wi= 2R3(N+ 1)i5/(N+ 1−i)7(4) 3in which Nis the number of radial points and Ris taken empirically [6] as one-half the Bragg radius of the atom on which the grid is centered (except for hydrogen, where Ris set equal to the Bohr radius). For molecular calculations, the partitioning function p(r) introduced in Eq.(1) needs to be deﬁned. One common choice is due to Becke [8]. Consider t he confocal elliptical coordinate µAB=rA−rB/RAB(in which rAandrBare distances towards nuclei AandB, andRABrepresents the internuclear distance), and deﬁne p(µ) =1 2[1−g(µ)], where g(µ) is the ‘cell function’. The extreme choice g(µAB)=−1 ifµAB≤0; =+1 if µAB>0 (i.e. a Heaviside-type step function) would actually represent a s cheme in which space is simply partitioned into Voronoi polyhedra: this will obviously be a numerically unstable scheme, since molecules by deﬁnition have appreciable electron den sityρ(of which the integrand is a functional) near bond midpoints µAB= 0. Becke [8] proposed to use a smoother approximation g(µ) =f(f(f(µ))), where f(µ) =3 2µ−1 2µ3. Stratmann, Scuseria, and Frisch (SSF) [9] proposed to use a piecewise function instead, name lyg(µAB)=−1 ifµAB≤ −a; =+1 if µAB≥a; =1 16[35(µAB/a)−35(µAB/a)3+ 21(µAB/a)5−5(µAB/a)7] otherwise, where the scale factor a= 0.64 was determined empirically.1The SSF partitioning is reported to be numerically somewhat more stable, and in addition lend s itself well to linear-scaling implementations [9]. III. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS All calculations were carried out using Gaussian 98 Rev. A7 [ 3] running on various workstation computers at NASA Ames Research Center and the W eizmann Institute of Science. A variety of Gaussian basis sets was used, including the Popl e group 6-31G, 6-31+G, 1As pointed out by a referee, this latter expression is equiva lent to eq. (24), with m=3, of Ref. [6], although a piecewise g(µ) was not proposed there. 4and 6-31++G** basis sets [10], the Dunning cc-pVDZ and cc-pV TZ basis sets (correlation consistent [11,12] polarized valence double and triple zet a, respectively), and the Hay-Wadt LANL2DZ (Los Alamos National Laboratory 2 Double-Zeta [13] ) basis set-relativistic ECP combination. In virtually all cases, the very popular B3LYP (Becke 3-para meter-Lee-Yang-Parr) hy- brid exchange-correlation functional [14,15] was used, ex cept for some test calculations using the earlier BLYP (Becke-Lee-Yang-Parr [15,16]) or BP86 (Be cke-Perdew 1986 [16,17]) func- tionals. We consider three types of grids: •(nn,mmm ), meaning the direct product of an nn-point Euler-Maclaurin radial grid with a two-dimensional Lebedev grid with mmm angular points; •(nn,mm,2mm), meaning the direct product of an Euler-Maclaurin grid wit hnnpoints inrand of Gauss-Legendre quadratures with mmand 2mmpoints in θandφ, respec- tively; •(nn,mmm )p, i.e. pruned ( nn,mmm ) grids. In pruned grids [18], the number of angular points is varied with the radial coordinate, with th e full number of mmm only being used at rvalues relevant for conventional chemical bonding. In Gaus - sian 98, the following pruned grids are implemented: (35,11 0)p (invoked with the keyword “Grid=Coarse”), (50,194)p (the SG-1 grid [18] invo ked with the keyword “Grid=SG1”), (75,302)p (invoked with the keyword “Grid=Fi ne”), and (99,590)p (in- voked as “Grid=UltraFine”). Pruned grids are only implemen ted for elements up to and including krypton: for heavier elements, the correspon ding unpruned grid is sub- stituted. (We note that in the implementation in Gaussian 98 , the cutoﬀ radii between segments with diﬀerent angular grid meshes are dependent on the row in the Peri- odic Table: this in eﬀect does result in some grid quality adj ustment with the atomic number.) In frequency calculations using analytical second derivat ives [19], Gaussian 98 permits 5the use of diﬀerent grids for the evaluation of the energy and gradient on the one hand, and for the solution of the CPKS (coupled perturbed Kohn-Sha m) equations on the other hand. The defaults of the program correspond to “Int(Grid=F ine) CPHF(Grid=Coarse)”; specifying “Int(Grid=UltraFine)” implies “CPHF(Grid=SG 1)” by default.2 Unless noted otherwise, tightened convergence criteria we re used in geometry optimiza- tions. IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. CCH radical The acetyl radical is linear with a2Σ+ground state. At the B3LYP/cc-pVTZ level with the default grid combination, however, one surprisingly ﬁn ds (Table I) not only an imaginary bending frequency, but that the two “degenerate” component s diﬀer by 64 cm−1. Upon repeating the calculation with an extremely large (140,48, 96) grid, a properly degenerate bending frequency of 312.5 cm−1(intensity 3.84 km/mol) was found, irrespective of whether Becke or SSF partitioning is used. Taking the SSF (140,48,96 ) result as the reference, we ﬁnd the default grid to be in error by only 0.3 and 0.1 cm−1for the CC and CH stretches, respectively, while the two components of the bending frequ ency are oﬀ by a whopping −421 and−492 cm−1, respectively. (N.b.: we have treated the imaginary freque ncies as negative numbers when we compute the error.) Likewise, while errors o f about 5 and 1 % are seen for the CC and CH intensities, respectively, the bend intens ity is too high by an order of magnitude. Using Becke instead of SSF weights does not mater ially aﬀect these observations. Specifying “Grid=Ultraﬁne” (i.e. (99,590)p for integrati on, and (50,194)p for CPKS) leads to a dramatic improvement in the bending frequency, wh ich is now properly degener- 2In Gaussian 98, the keyword CPHF controls options for both th e Coupled Perturbed Hartree- Fock procedure in wavefunction based ab initio calculation s and for CPKS in density functional calculations. 6ate and only 7 cm−1too low. (The intensities for the other two modes now agree wi th the reference values to two decimal places.) The error in the cor responding infrared intensity drops by two orders of magnitude. Specifying the (99,590)p g rid for both integration and CPKS does not aﬀect the stretching frequencies, but reduces the error on the bending fre- quency and intensity to 0.1 cm−1and 0.01 km/mol, respectively, using either Becke or SSF partitioning. This clearly suggests that sensitivity is gr eatest to the CPKS grid. Using the (75,302)p grid for integration and varying the CPK S grid from the associated (35,110)p default, we ﬁnd that the spurious imaginary, nond egenerate bending frequencies disappear upon using either the unpruned (35,110) or the lar ger pruned (50,194)p grid. However, errors of about –10 and –7 cm−1in the bending frequency remain, and are not reduced to the 1 cm−1range until a (75,302)p or even (75,302) CPKS grid is substit uted. Upgrading the energy grid to (99,590)p does not aﬀect these c onclusions. Surprisingly, using a (99,974) grid for both integration an d CPKS yields slightly diﬀerent frequencies for the two components of the πbending mode. Upon ﬁnding an imaginary frequency, one is tempted to displa ce the molecular geometry in the direction of that mode and reoptimize the geometry. Fo llowing this procedure, using the Gaussian 98 defaults (an energy grid of (75,302)p, a CPKS grid of (35,110)p, and the SSF weights), one obtains a HCC angle of 171.1 degrees and three r eal frequencies. However, one of the six trivial vibrations (i.e., overall translatio n and rotation, which should have exactly vanishing frequencies in an inﬁnitely precise calc ulation using a rotationally invariant method) has a frequency of 508 icm−1. Thus lowering symmetry has just made the numerical problem less obvious. Unlike the frequencies which show a large sensitivity to the choice of grid, the total energy of CCH is in error by less than 1 microhartree for all grids stu died. Considering the small eﬀect on the energy, it is not surprising that the CCH results are most sensitive to the CPKS grid. 7B. Harmonic frequencies of TaCl 2 The ground state for this symmetric linear molecule is X4Σ− g. Results at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ level as a function of the integration and CPK S grids are summarized in Table II. Our largest grid (140,48,96) SSF results will agai n be considered as the reference. None of the grid combinations considered in Table II lead to n onequivalent bending vibration components, but the default grid combination doe s produce a spurious imaginary bending frequency. Unlike CCH, the bending infrared intens ities agree well with the largest grid value, but the symmetric and antisymmetric stretching frequencies are in error by −6 and−7 cm−1, respectively. Use of the Becke partitioning leads not only to increased errors in the stretching frequencies, but to an error of +0.002 ˚A in the optimum bond distance, compared to −0.0003˚A with the SSF partitioning. Quite diﬀerent from the behavio r for CCH is the fact that the total energy is now in error by 310 micr ohartree with the SSF partitioning, and 369 microhartree with the Becke partitio ning. In this particular case, varying the size of the CPKS grid, an d particularly of its angular component, does not appear to remedy the problem at hand. Usi ng an unpruned energy grid, however3, or using a grid with more radial points, dramatically reduc es the error in the computed total energy, bond distance, and frequencies, particularly using the SSF parti- tioning. In particular, the (99,590)p/(50,194)p integrat ion/CPKS grid combination invoked by “Grid=UltraFine” incurs (with SSF partitioning) no erro r greater than 1 cm−1on the frequencies, and reduces the errors in bond distance and tot al energy to 0.0001 ˚A and 1.5 microhartree, respectively. While it is possible that usin g the Becke atomic size adjustment procedure (Appendix of Ref. [8]), in conjuction with the SSF weights, would reduce the sen- sitivity to the radial grid, we note that using the ‘UltraFin e’ grid combination solves both the CCH angular grid problem and the TaCl 2radial grid problem, and therefore would seem 3Note that this change will only aﬀect the Cl atomic grid in thi s case, as grids for elements heavier than Kr are always unpruned in Gaussian 98. 8to be a good choice to invesigate possible grid problems. For TaCl 2, performance of the SSF partitioning seems markedly superi or to that of the Becke partitioning. As expected, diﬀerences between the tw o partitioning schemes are re- duced as the grid is improved, and they yield essentially ide ntical results for the (140,48,96) grid. Lowering the symmetry to C2vand using the Gaussian 98 defaults results in a slightly bent structure with a ClTaCl angle of 171.1 degrees. As in the case of CCH, the only indication of the numerical problems is in the deviation fro m zero of the translational and rotational frequencies, but for TaCl 2the value is 33 icm−1, making the error for TaCl 2less obvious than in the case of CCH (see above). If we now consider relative CPU times (default grids=1.00) a s a function of grid size, we see that the (99,590)p/(50,194)p combination will approxi mately double CPU time. Using a (99,590)p grid for both integration and CPKS is found to be a f actor of nine more expensive than the default, a ratio which goes up to a factor of 19 for the unpruned (99,974) grid, of 36 for the (96,32,64) grid often cited in benchmarks, and of 1 09 for the largest (140,48,96) grid considered here. The (99,590)p/(75,302)p combinatio n found to be required for 1 cm−1 precision in the bending frequency of CCH would be four times more expensive than the default — rather more time-consuming than desirable, but st ill an order of magnitude less expensive than the (96,32,64) grid. C. Harmonic frequencies of Ge 2H5and Ge 2H6 Ge2H6hasD3dsymmetry and a structure analogous to ethane. Ge 2H5is best viewed as removing one H from Ge 2H6, which results in Cssymmetry; there is only a small change in the structural parameters relative to the parent Ge 2H6molecule. In Table III we summarize our results for Ge 2H5. In addition to the eﬀect of partitioning and grid size, we also consider the inﬂuence of the basis set a nd of the exchange-correlation functional on the three lowest harmonic frequencies of Ge 2H5. We ﬁrst consider using the Becke partitioning. Using the default grid in Gaussian, i.e . a pruned (75,302)p grid for energy 9and gradients and (35,110)p for CPKS, results in an imaginar y frequency. Expanding the radial grid from 75 to 96 points and depruning the grid, i.e. t he (96,302) grid, for the energy, gradient, and CPKS steps does not remove the imaginary frequ ency. Expanding the angular grid removes the numerical problem; with 590 angular points , the lowest harmonic frequency is essentially converged to a value of about 100 cm−1. Expanding the radial grid further has only an eﬀect of a few cm−1. The results using SSF partitioning are very diﬀerent from th ose obtained using Becke partitioning; using SSF, even the default “Grid=Fine” is pr ecise to better than 10 cm−1. Improving the grid makes much smaller changes for SSF and the “UltraFine” grid in Gaus- sian 98 (i.e., (99,590)p for energy and gradients, (50,194) p for CPKS) appears to be es- sentially converged. Note that for the Becke partitioning t he “UltraFine” grid also yields essentially converged results. Adding diﬀuse functions to the Ge atoms or diﬀuse and polariz ation functions to the H atoms does not eliminate the imaginary frequency for the de fault grid and the Becke partitioning. That is, the problem is not unique to the 6-31G * basis set. Nor is it unique to the use of a hybrid functional: substituti ng the BP86 functional for its B3LYP counterpart does not alter the trends with respect to p artitioning and grid, the most notable point being the imaginary frequency for the default grid with Becke partitioning. The Ge 2H5calculations are repeated using the LANL2DZ basis set/ECP c ombination, and the results are also given in Table III. Unlike the all-el ectron calculations, there is essentially no diﬀerence between Becke and SSF partitionin g, and improving the grid has only a very small eﬀect. This is also true for the four- and 14- valence electron Ge ECPs of Hurley et al.[20]. Thus it appears that the diﬀerence observed in the all- electron calculations arises from the inner-shell orbitals. For the default grids and the Becke partitioning, displacin g the molecular geometry in the direction of the imaginary mode results in essentially the s ame geometry and frequencies as found in the Cstreatment. That is, lowering the symmetry does not eliminat e the imaginary frequency, so the numerical problems are much more obvious t han for CCH and TaCl 2. 10Substituting Si for Ge leads to a similar structure, but as sh own in Table IV, neither the choice of grid points nor the partitioning scheme make much o f a diﬀerence for the Si 2H5 system. The lack of sensitivity of the results to grid or part itioning is similar to the results reported [9] by SSF, and is typical of many other tests that we have performed for systems containing ﬁrst and second row atoms. The problem of the imag inary frequency does not exist for Ga 2Cl5: the Becke and SSF partitioning agree to within 4 cm−1for the 6-31+G* basis set and the default grids. Given that Si 2H5, Ge 2Cl5, and Ge 2H5have similar shapes, we conclude that the shape of Ge 2H5does not lead to the numerical problems that result in the imaginary frequency. In Table V we summarize the results for Ge 2H6, which is a closed-shell, stable molecule. It shows the same variation in the frequencies with choice of partitioning and grid points as Ge2H5, and we conclude that the diﬀerence between results using Be cke and SSF partitioning is not unique to Ge 2H5. It is encouraging that the default SSF partitioning is less sensitive to the choice of grid, but it is also sobering to realize that i t is possible to have an error of about 70 cm−1with no obvious indication of an error. D. Relative energies of cis- and trans-HIr[PR 3]4Cl+ The peculiar cis-trans equilibrium of the HIr[PR 3]4Cl+(R=H, CH 3) transition metal complexes was the subject of a very recent joint theoretical -experimental investigation [21]. At the highest level of theory for R=CH 3, the complexes are found to be essentially isoen- ergetic, with the equilibrium between the two being essenti ally wholly driven by the higher entropy of the cis form: experimentally [21], a 6:1 cis:tran s equilibrium is found at room temperature. Given the very small energy diﬀerences being considered her e, as well as the rather ﬂat potential surface of particularly the cis form, grid conver gence (not discussed in Ref. [21]) was obviously a cause for concern here. Upon ﬁrst optimizing the cis-R=CH 3case using the default grids and computing vibrational frequencies, w e found what appeared to be a local minimum. Upon recomputing the harmonic frequencies w ith the (99,590)p/(50,194)p 11integral/CPKS grid combination, we found this structure to be a saddle point of order 3, and only after thirteen geometry optimization cycles using analytical second derivatives (and two months of CPU time on an SGI Origin 2000) was the true minim um structure found. A superimposition of the two structures (created using the MO LDEN [22] molecular viewing program) is displayed in Figure 1. While the R=CH 3case is simply too large to do an exhaustive grid convergence study, we have summarized some data for the R=H case in Table VI. In part icular, we have considered the absolute energies for the cis and trans isomers, and thei r relative energy, as a function of grid size. In this case, results seems to be quite dependen t both on the radial and on the angular grid mesh. Using the (35,110)p grid employed by d efault in the CPKS step, the relative energy gets predicted with the wrong sign, and n either the use of an unpruned grid nor switching to a product grid of the same order remedy t he problem — if anything, results get worse, suggesting that the (35,110)p results in fact beneﬁt from a fortunate error compensation. Total energies are oﬀ by as much as 8 millihartree for the trans isomer. While a scatter in the energies does not necessarily imply a c orresponding scatter in the CPKS solution, it does not seem entiely implausible that a gr id that predicts isomer energy diﬀerences on a surface with the wrong sign might yield a Hess ian with incorrect curvature if used in the CPKS step. The smallest grid that at least predicts the correct sign for the cis-trans diﬀerence is (50,194)p (about 25% too high in absolute value): using an un pruned grid instead4cuts the error in half, as does using the (75,302)p grid. Total ene rgies are however still in error by amounts of about 60 microhartree: fortunately the errors largely cancel. The (99,590)p (“UltraFine”) grid agrees to two decimal places with the (14 0,48,96) reference results; even a grid as large as (99,974) cannot yet achieve 1 microhartree precision in the total energies, which is barely reached for a (99,27,54) grid, and more comfo rtably for a (99,32,64) grid. 4Again, since the Ir grid is always unpruned, the improvement in grid quality comes from addi- tional grid points centered on the other atoms. 12V. CONCLUSIONS Computed molecular properties using density functional th eory in general, and vibra- tional frequencies in particular, tend to be quite sensitiv e to the integration grids and par- titioning being used in the calculation. Our results corrob orate the assertion of SSF that their proposed partitioning scheme is numerically more sta ble than the Becke partitioning. While the use of coarse grids in the solution of the CPKS (coup led perturbed Kohn-Sham) equations certainly leads to signiﬁcant speedups, it can ca use spurious negative eigenvalues in the Hessian matrix, or even artifactual loss of vibration al mode degeneracy, in systems as small and uncomplicated as CCH radical. While this proble m is alleviated by the use of unpruned grids, this oﬀers no beneﬁt (in terms of CPU time) over the use of a larger pruned grid. For systems involving very heavy elements (e.g . third-row transition metals), grids which are suﬃciently ﬁne-meshed for typical ﬁrst-and second-row systems are no longer adequate. In situations where small pruned grids are inadeq uate, the use of the corresponding unpruned grid appears to be less eﬃcient than the use of a larg er pruned grid. For the cases considered here, the most eﬃcient grid combina tion that appears to be ‘immune’ to qualitatively incorrect results is (99,590)p f or energy and gradients, (50,194)p for CPKS. (This is equivalent to the “Grid=UltraFine” optio n in Gaussian 98.) For greater quantitative precision, the use of a ﬁner-meshed (75,302)p grid for the CPKS is recom- mended. While a (99,974), (96,32,64) or even ﬁner grid in all steps of the calculation will certainly avoid this type of problems, this comes at an unacc eptably high premium in terms of CPU time. As quantum chemical methods mature and quantum chemical sof tware becomes more user-friendly, an increasing proportion of their users are scientists from other ﬁelds than quantum chemistry, who are inevitably exposed to the tempta tion to treat such program systems as ‘black boxes’. Observations such as those made in the present paper illustrate that even at the present state of technology, ‘black box’ per formance should not be taken for granted, and that acquiring some insight in both the quan tum mechanical and numer- 13ical methodology is still an essential prerequisite for the ir eﬀective and reliable scientiﬁc application. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS JM is the incumbent of the Helen and Milton A. Kimmelman Caree r Development Chair. Research at the Weizmann Institute was supported by the Mine rva Foundation, Munich, Germany, and by the Tashtiyot program of the Ministry of Science (Israel). JM would like to thank Dr. S. Parthiban for bringing the problem with CCH to his attention, and Dr. Andreas Sundermann for critical reading of the draft manusc ript. AR was supported by NASA Contract No. NAS2-14031. NOTE ADDED After acceptance of the present manuscript, and in response to a preprint thereof, we received a personal communication from Gary W. Trucks and Mi chael J. Frisch of Gaussian, Inc., informing us of a bug in Gaussian 98 which aﬀects the int egral (derivative) accuracy for the speciﬁc case of the (35,110)p grid. A ﬁx will be incorporated in the ne xt minor release after Rev.A9. The main eﬀect on the data presented in this paper is that the errors in the ﬁrst two entries in Table 1 become a good deal less drama tic: in particular, the degeneracy of the bend is restored and the errors in ω3andI3are reduced to -19 cm−1and 1.2 km/mol, respectively. In addition, we reoptimized the comp lex in Figure 1 using a patched version of the code with the default grid combination (and us ing analytical second derivatives as before). The resulting geometry is in much closer agreeme nt with the Grid=UltraFine structure. (The cis-trans diﬀerence with the (35,110)p gri d in Table VI is not aﬀected materially.) The authors would like to thank Drs. Trucks and Frisch for helpful discussions. 14REFERENCES [1] P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136(1964)864; W. Koh n and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140(1965)1133. [2] R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density functional theory of atoms and molecules (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989). [3] M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, R. E. Stratma nn, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Str ain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pome lli, C. Adamo, S. Cliﬀord, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui , K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. C ioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Ko maromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, W. C hen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, and J. A. P ople,Gaussian 98, Revision A.7 (Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998). http://www.gaussian.com/ [4] V. I. Lebedev, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 15 (1975) 48; V. I. Lebedev, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 16 (1976) 293; V. I. Lebedev, Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 18 (1977) 132; V. I. Lebedev, A. L. Skorokhodov, Russian Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math. 4 5 (1992) 587. [5] R. D. Adamson, PhD Thesis (Trinity College, Cambridge, U K, 1999); http://ket.ch. cam.ac.uk/people/ross/thesis/ [6] C. W. Murray, N. C. Handy, and G. J. Laming, Mol. Phys. 78(1 993)997 [7] S. F. Boys and N. C. Handy, Proc. Royal Soc. A 311 (1969) 309 ; N. C. Handy and S. F. Boys, Theor. Chim. Acta. 31 (1973) 195. [8] A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 88(1988)2547 15[9] R. E. Stratmann, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, Chem. Ph ys. Lett. 257(1996)213 [10] W. J. Hehre, L. Radom, P. von Ragu´ e Schleyer and J. A. Pop le,Ab initio molecular orbital theory (Wiley, New York, 1986) [11] T. H. Dunning Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 90(1989)1007. [12] T.H. Dunning Jr., K.A. Peterson, D.E. Woon, “Correlati on consistent basis sets for molecular calculations”, in Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry , ed. P. von Ragu´ e Schleyer, (Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1998). [13] W. R. Wadt, and P. J. Hay, J. Chem. Phys. 82(1985)284. [14] A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98(1993)5648; see also P. J. S tephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chabalowski, and M. J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 98(1994)116 23. [15] C. Lee, W. Yang, R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37(1988)785 [16] A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38(1988)3098 [17] J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 33(1986)8822; erratum 34 (198 6) 7406. [18] P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, and J. A. Pople, Chem. Phys. L ett. 209(1993)506 [19] B. G. Johnson, and M. J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 100(1994) 7429; J. C. Burant, M. C. Strain, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, Chem. Phys. Lett. 25 8(1996)45 [20] M. M. Hurley, L. F. Pacios, P. A. Christiansen, R. B. Ross , and W. C. Ermler, J. Chem. Phys. 84(1986)6840 [21] O. Blum, R. Carmielli, J. M. L. Martin, and D. Milstein, Organometallics , submitted. [22] G. Schaftenaar, MOLDEN 3.6 (CMBI, University of Nijmeg en, The Netherlands, 1999). http://www.cmbi.kun.nl/~schaft/molden/molden.html 16TABLES TABLE I. Numerical errors in computed B3LYP/cc-pVTZ proper ties for acetyl radical as a function of grid size. The values are given for the largest gr id, which is used as our reference. Energy CPKS Partition ∆E(uEh) ∆ ω3x ∆I3x ∆ω3y ∆I3y ∆ω2 ∆I2 ∆ω1 ∆I1 grid grid scheme µEh cm−1km/mol cm−1km/mol cm−1km/mol cm−1km/mol (75,302)p (35,110)p B 0.65 -481.35 38.53 -417.12 30.42 -0.2 1 0.28 0.62 -0.53 (75,302)p (35,110)p SSF -0.10 -492.09 39.55 -420.61 30.92 0 .29 0.28 0.08 -0.55 (75,302)p (35,110) B 0.65 -10.07 0.61 -10.07 0.61 -0.32 0.00 0.44 0.00 (75,302)p (35,110) SSF -0.10 -9.42 0.61 -9.42 0.61 0.17 0.00 -0.12 -0.01 (75,302) (35,110) B 0.59 -9.84 0.61 -9.84 0.61 -0.32 -0.01 0. 45 0.00 (75,302) (35,110) SSF -0.16 -9.25 0.61 -9.25 0.61 0.17 0.00 - 0.11 0.00 (75,302)p (50,194)p B 0.65 -7.43 0.44 -7.43 0.44 -0.32 -0.01 0.44 0.00 (75,302)p (50,194)p SSF -0.10 -6.79 0.44 -6.79 0.44 0.17 0.0 0 -0.12 -0.01 (75,302)p (75,302)p B 0.65 0.73 -0.08 0.73 -0.08 -0.32 -0.01 0.44 0.00 (75,302)p (75,302)p SSF -0.10 1.34 -0.08 1.34 -0.08 0.17 0.0 0 -0.12 -0.01 (75,302) (75,302) B 0.59 0.08 -0.02 0.08 -0.02 -0.32 0.00 0.4 5 0.00 (75,302) (75,302) SSF -0.16 0.64 -0.02 0.64 -0.02 0.17 0.00 - 0.11 0.00 (99,590)p (50,194)p B -0.04 -7.06 0.45 -7.06 0.45 0.06 0.00 0 .10 0.00 (99,590)p (50,194)p SSF 0.12 -7.06 0.45 -7.06 0.45 -0.09 0.0 0 -0.29 0.00 (99,590)p (75,302)p B -0.04 1.08 -0.07 1.08 -0.07 0.06 0.00 0 .10 0.00 (99,590)p (75,302)p SSF 0.12 1.09 -0.07 1.09 -0.07 -0.09 0.0 0 -0.29 0.00 (99,590)p (99,590)p B -0.04 0.11 -0.01 0.11 -0.01 0.06 0.00 0 .10 0.00 (99,590)p (99,590)p SSF 0.12 0.12 -0.01 0.12 -0.01 -0.09 0.0 0 -0.29 0.00 (99,590) (99,590) B -0.04 0.07 -0.01 0.07 -0.01 0.06 0.00 0.1 0 0.00 (99,590) (99,590) SSF 0.12 0.07 -0.01 0.07 -0.01 -0.09 0.00 - 0.29 0.00 (99,974) (99,974) B -0.06 0.01 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.08 0 .00 (99,974) (99,974) SSF 0.11 0.03 0.00 0.73 0.00 -0.08 0.00 -0. 25 0.00 (99,36,72) (99,36,72) B -0.07 0.14 -0.01 0.14 -0.01 0.06 0.0 0 0.08 0.00 (99,36,72) (99,36,72) SSF 0.11 0.15 -0.01 0.15 -0.01 -0.08 0 .00 -0.25 0.00 (140,48,96) (140,48,96) B 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 -0.01 0.00 (140,48,96) (140,48,96) SSF ...a312.54 3.85 312.54 3.85 2094.63 5.05 3456.85 56.60 aThe total energy is -76.63761769 Hartrees. 17TABLE II. Numerical errors in computed B3LYP/LANL2DZ prope rties of TaCl 2(X4Σ− g state) as a function of grid size. The values are given for the largest grid, which is used as our reference. Energy CPKS Partition ∆r ∆E ∆ ω3 ∆I3 ∆ω2 ∆ω1 ∆I1 relative Grid Grid scheme m ˚A µEh cm−1km/mol cm−1cm−1km/mol CPU time (75,302)p (35,110)p B 1.86 368.55 -60.21 0.02 -7.67 -8.86 -0 .23 1.00 (75,302)p (35,110)p SSF -0.26 309.60 -59.90 -0.01 -5.40 -6. 80 -0.01 1.00 (75,302) (35,110) B 0.04 -17.03 3.97 0.00 0.15 0.20 -0.01 3.0 5 (75,302) (35,110) SSF 0.11 -5.48 1.83 0.00 -0.15 -0.16 -0.01 2.98 (75,302)p (50,194)p B 1.86 368.55 -60.25 0.02 -7.67 -8.85 -0 .22 2.02 (75,302)p (50,194)p SSF -0.26 309.60 -59.95 -0.01 -5.40 -6. 80 0.00 2.01 (75,302)p (75,302)p B 1.86 368.55 -60.26 0.02 -7.67 -8.86 -0 .22 3.86 (75,302)p (75,302)p SSF -0.26 309.60 -59.95 -0.01 -5.41 -6. 80 0.00 3.82 (99,590)p (35,110)p B 0.09 -16.84 4.52 0.00 0.15 0.23 -0.02 1 .16 (99,590)p (35,110)p SSF 0.10 -1.54 0.91 0.00 -0.06 -0.04 -0. 02 1.15 (99,590)p (50,194)p B 0.09 -16.84 4.49 0.00 0.15 0.23 -0.01 2 .19 (99,590)p (50,194)p SSF 0.10 -1.54 0.88 0.00 -0.06 -0.04 -0. 01 2.17 (99,590)p (75,302)p B 0.09 -16.84 4.49 0.00 0.15 0.23 -0.01 4 .00 (99,590)p (75,302)p SSF 0.10 -1.54 0.88 0.00 -0.06 -0.04 -0. 01 3.97 (99,590)p (99,590)p B 0.09 -16.84 4.49 0.00 0.15 0.23 -0.01 8 .96 (99,590)p (99,590)p SSF 0.10 -1.54 0.88 0.00 -0.06 -0.04 -0. 01 8.91 (99,974) (99,974) B 0.00 0.11 -0.02 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 19. 2 (99,974) (99,974) SSF 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.02 0.00 19 .1 (96,32,64) (96,32,64) B 0.00 -0.01 0.11 0.00 -0.02 -0.03 0.0 0 36.7 (96,32,64) (96,32,64) SSF 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 -0.05 -0.06 0. 00 36.3 (99,48,96) (99,48,96) B 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 80.1 (99,48,96) (99,48,96) SSF 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.02 0. 00 79.1 (140,48,96) (140,48,96) B 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110.4 (140,48,96) (140,48,96) SSF 2335.357 ...a35.89 3.96 347.51 375.63 107.73 109.4 aThe total energy is –87.74246174 Hartrees. 18TABLE III. Summary of the three lowest harmonic frequencies of Ge 2H5. Energy CPKS Becke partitioning SSF partitioning Grid Grid B3LYP/6-31G* (75,302)p (35,110)p 77.9i 250.2 352.2 114.2 250.5 363.6 (75,302) (75,302) 77.6i 250.2 352.2 114.2 250.5 363.6 (96,302) (96,302) 39.6i 250.2 356.0 101.0 250.4 361.5 (75,434) (75,434) 44.6 250.4 365.5 107.4 250.4 358.4 (75,590) (75,590) 108.4 250.3 360.6 95.3 250.4 360.4 (99,590)p (50,194)p 106.4 250.4 359.9 103.1 250.4 360.0 (99,590) (99,590) 106.5 250.4 359.9 103.1 250.4 359.9 (75,770) (75,770) 103.6 250.3 360.5 105.8 250.4 361.5 (75,974) (75,974) 107.7 250.3 360.2 103.9 250.4 360.5 (96,974) (96,974) 106.2 250.3 360.5 105.0 250.4 360.3 (128,974) (128,974) 106.8 250.4 360.3 105.2 250.4 360.1 B3LYP/6-31+G* (75,302)p (35,110)p 82.7i 250.7 352.8 111.6 250.8 364.1 B3LYP/6-31++G** (75,302)p (35,110)p 36.6i 252.8 349.7 110.9 252.8 368.8 BP86/6-31G* (75,302)p (35,110)p 109.8i 247.4 337.7 95.4 247.9 349.1 (99,590) (99,590) 108.0 247.9 347.5 96.9 247.9 346.9 B3LYP/LANL2DZ (75,302)p (35,110)p 88.8 241.5 373.7 89.1 241.5 373.7 (99,590) (99,590) 88.3 241.5 373.8 88.3 241.5 373.8 19TABLE IV. Summary of the three lowest and the three highest ha rmonic frequencies of Si 2H5 using the 6-31G* basis set and the B3LYP functional. Energy CPKS Partition Harmonic frequencies Grid Grid Scheme (75,302)p (35,110)p B 123.4 390.4 407.1 2233.2 2244.8 2254. 5 (75,302)p (35,110)p SSF 124.0 390.2 407.2 2227.9 2241.1 225 0.8 (75,302) (75,302) B 123.3 390.4 407.0 2233.2 2244.8 2254.5 (75,302) (75,302) SSF 123.9 390.3 407.1 2227.9 2241.1 2250. 8 (96,974) (96,974) B 122.2 390.6 408.6 2231.2 2243.5 2253.2 (96,974) (96,974) SSF 122.1 390.6 408.8 2229.9 2242.8 2252. 4 (99,590)p (50,194)p B 125.4 391.2 409.8 2231.1 2243.3 2253. 0 (99,590)p (50,194)p SSF 123.1 390.7 409.0 2230.8 2243.2 225 2.8 20TABLE V. Summary of the three lowest harmonic frequencies of Ge2H6using the 6-31G* basis set and the B3LYP functional. Energy CPKS Becke partitioning SSF partitioning Grid Grid (75,302)p (35,110)p 57.1 259.7 347.0 123.9 259.8 360.7 (75,302) (75,302) 54.1 259.7 346.8 122.6 259.8 360.5 (75,434) (75,434) 44.6i 259.7 351.7 116.8 259.8 353.0 (75,590) (75,590) 93.0 259.7 347.5 111.7 259.8 356.3 (99,590)p (50,194)p 94.2 259.8 347.3 107.7 259.8 353.2 (99,590) (99,590) 94.5 259.8 347.3 107.9 259.8 353.2 (75,770) (75,770) 106.6 259.7 353.9 112.3 259.8 355.1 (75,974) (75,974) 110.7 259.7 353.6 108.6 259.8 354.1 (96,302) (96,302) 75.2 259.7 351.9 109.9 259.8 356.3 (96,434) (96,434) 30.0i 259.8 351.8 102.6 259.8 352.9 (96,974) (96,974) 110.1 259.7 353.8 109.0 259.8 353.8 (128,974) (128,974) 110.3 259.8 353.8 109.4 259.8 353.7 21TABLE VI. Numerical errors in absolute and relative B3LYP/L ANL2DZ energies of cis and trans isomersaof HIr(PH 3)4Cl+as a function of grid size Grid ∆E ∆E Isomerization trans( C4v) cis( Cs) energy µEh µEh kcal/mol (35,110)p 2488.42 890.21 0.409 (35,110) 5638.22 1301.61 2.127 (35,9,18) 8400.38 113.28 4.606 (50,194)p -236.21 112.62 -0.813 (50,194) -118.27 17.55 -0.679 (50,12,24) 653.35 77.73 -0.233 (50,302) -110.06 17.55 -0.674 (50,15,30) -118.27 -95.50 -0.608 (75,302)p -58.35 63.27 -0.670 (75,302) -33.64 12.74 -0.623 (75, 15, 30) -23.58 -44.17 -0.581 (99,194) -68.07 52.53 -0.670 (99,12,24) 708.68 135.89 -0.235 (99, 302) -33.52 10.52 -0.622 (99, 15, 30) -21.44 -44.17 -0.580 (99, 590)p -15.29 -7.81 -0.599 (99, 590) -10.22 -5.75 -0.597 (99, 21, 42) 0.68 5.52 -0.597 (99, 974) -2.29 0.70 -0.596 (99, 27, 54) 0.39 -0.97 -0.593 (99, 32, 64) 0.64 0.21 -0.594 (99, 36, 72) 0.11 0.13 -0.594 (50, 48, 96) -85.20 -45.60 -0.619 (75, 48, 96) -2.03 2.24 -0.597 (99, 48, 96) -0.13 0.14 -0.594 (140, 48, 96) 0.00b0.00b-0.594 (50, 590) -92.82 -49.43 -0.621 (75, 590) -12.14 -3.19 -0.600 (99, 590) -10.22 -5.75 -0.597 (120, 590) -10.19 -5.89 -0.597 aReference geometries were obtained at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ le vel with the (99,590)p/(50,194)p grid combination and tightened optim ization criteria. bTotal energies: cis −153.25208234, trans −153.25302915 hartree. 22FIGURES FIG. 1. Superimposition of B3LYP/LANL2DZ optimized struct ures for cis-HIr[P(CH 3)3]4Cl+ with the (75,302)p/(35,110)p (dark grey) and (99,590)p/(5 0,194)p (light grey) grid combinations. 23
arXiv:physics/0006070v1 [physics.gen-ph] 28 Jun 2000A General Symbolic Method with Physical Applications Greg M. Smith June 24, 2011Contents 0.1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0.2 ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL REVIEW 5 1.1 Introduction: On the Notion of Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2 Motivation and Historical Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.2.1 Linguistics and Cognitive Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.2.2 Metamathematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.2.3 Physics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.3 A Departure from Prior Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2 A SCHEMATIC OVERVIEW OF PHYSICS 25 2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.2 The Ideal Relationship Between Theory and Experiment . . . . . 25 2.3 A Realistic Examination of the Behavior of Scientists . . . . . . . 26 2.4 A Criticism of the Role of Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3 THE UNIFICATION OF LANGUAGE AND EXPERIENCE 31 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.2 Individuals and Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.3 Perception and Meaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.4 An Important Illustrative Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 3.5 The Development of Language and the Notion of Truth . . . . . 34 4 BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SYMBOLIC SYS- TEM 37 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 4.2 Reserved Symbols and the Formal Nature of Language . . . . . . 37 4.3 Partial Order and Formal Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4.4 A Preliminary Consideration of the Formal System . . . . . . . . 40 4.5 The Necessity of Generalizing Lattices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.6 The Symbolic System as a Division Ring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4.7 Order in the Symbolic System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.8 Finiteness and Some Concrete Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 15 THE CALCULUS GENERALIZED 48 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 5.2 Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 5.3 Diﬀerentiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 5.4 Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 5.5 The Relationship to the Usual Calculus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 6 COMPLETION OF THE SYMBOLIC SYSTEM 54 6.1 Functional Equations and Their Consequences . . . . . . . . . . 54 6.2 Frobenius’s Theorem and the Completion of the System . . . . . 56 6.3 Conclusions on the Algebraic System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7 7 THE DERIVATION OF PHYSICAL THEORY 58 7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 7.2 The Form of Finite Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 7.3 Determinism and Relativity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 7.3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 7.3.2 Derivation of the Interval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 7.3.3 Changes of Coordinates and the Canonical Form . . . . . 63 7.3.4 The Geodesic Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 7.3.5 The Metric Field Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 7.3.6 The Signiﬁcance of the Field Equation . . . . . . . . . . . 67 7.4 On Turing Computability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 7.5 Statistical Prediction and Probability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 7.6 Quantum Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 7.7 Conclusions on the Derived Theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 0 7.8 Einstein’s Alternatives and Finite Reality . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 7.9 On Generalizing Finite Theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 8 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 87 APPENDICES 90 A THE SOLUTION OF FUNCTIONAL EQUATIONS 90 A.1 The Associativity Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 A.2 The Categoricity Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 BIBLIOGRAPHY 20.1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT While certainly taking full responsibility for the content s of this thesis, it would yet be absurd of me to take full credit, for many people have co ntributed, however indirectly, to its completion. I’d like to at least t ake the trouble to thank a few of them. I’d ﬁrst like to note my obvious debt to those scientists of va rious disciplines whose ideas have inﬂuenced mine. In this connection the bibl iography is in- tended to be fairly thorough, though not exhaustive, in indi cating the works that, with respect to this paper, I’ve come into valuable con tact with. I’m sat- isﬁed to leave it to the reader to arrive at his own conclusion s as to the degree of originality of, or inﬂuences on, the thoughts expressed h erein. My exploration of the above works has been facilitated by the suggestions and criticisms of my committee: Professors Bringsjord, Dre w, McLaughlin, and Zenzen. These criticisms have decidedly increased the coge ncy of the presenta- tion which follows and, not only the content, but also the for m of this work has thus beneﬁted. I’m especially indebted to my advisor, Profe ssor Drew, for his patience and encouragement during the many revisions this w ork has undergone. Finally, I’d like to thank my parents for the innumerable eﬀo rts they’ve made on my behalf over the years. I hope they too ﬁnd some measure of satisfaction in the completion of this thesis. 30.2 ABSTRACT This thesis derives general physical results by an entirely formal process. Be- ginning with a brief examination of the notion of language it self, it next ex- plores Physics in a schematic fashion in order to arrive at co nclusions on the relationship between experience and language. This invest igation leads to the hypothesis that there is no separate reality to which langua ge refers, and there- for to the test of constructing physical theory without refe rence to experiment: If experience is not to direct the interpretation of languag e then language must yield its own interpretation. To make such an idea acceptable it is next shown how reference s to such a presumably ﬁctional entity such as an exterior reality may a rise within language itself, and how such references may, and must, be retained. F rom this starting- point an entirely formal language is developed, along with a n associated algebra and a Calculus, neither of which are restricted to ﬁnite quan tities. With the completion of the general symbolic system the deriv ation of both Relativity Theory and Quantum Theory, as well as the formal s tructures to which they apply, including space-time and sums-over-hist ories, follows from a purely non-empirical and ﬁnitary basis. The dynamical and t hermodynamical laws yielding the phenomenological aspects of experience, such as are described by variables for pressure, volume, and temperature, as well as the divisions comprising phases of matter, are also argued to naturally fo llow on this basis. It is therefor plausibly claimed that the formal approach has s ucceeded in yielding its own interpretation and in thus reproducing what has prev iously been asserted to be of necessarily empirical origin. It is, however, then found that this system is comprised of fo rmally incom- patible parts. It is thus apparently necessary to either rej ect the restriction to ﬁnite quantities or else accept the necessity of augmenting the formal system with a properly exterior reality, by which it is meant that “e xperience” must “inform” the system. Development of formal non-ﬁnitary the ory is then ar- gued to provide a plausible means of unifying the formalisms of Relativity and Quantum Theory. 4Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL REVIEW 1.1 Introduction: On the Notion of Language Every sentence ever written carries with it an implicit asse rtion of a power of that sentence to convey an idea and a more general aﬃrmatio n of written language itself. How indeed could anyone speak of something to which language cannot refer? And language is pervasive; many kinds of langu ages have been created by many diﬀerent peoples to serve varied ends. Besides obvious examples, one may also speak of music as bein g a kind of language, albeit one with a very ﬂexible grammar. Music, in f act, considered as a language, highlights the active role played by interpre tation in determining the ideas conveyed; any given musical score may be performed in a variety of ways by diﬀerent artists and received variously by distinct audiences. Along with interpretation often comes an assertion of what a langu age ought to mean and what its author meant. It’s often diﬃcult for a consensus to be achieved on this last issue, especially when the author is dead ! Mathematics is said to be a language; the language of the scie nces. While music often allows for a great deal of ﬂexibility in its inter pretation, Mathematics strives to be a precise language so that its utilization may h ave only one result - a uniquely correct interpretation. Mathematics is also of ten pure; It need not refer to anything outside of itself, in contrast to a musical score where each written note corresponds to some sound to be made. Consideration of these examples motivates a preliminary st ipulation. Lan- guage will be said to be in use whenever a system of written sym bols has some relevance. This is a deliberately unrestrictive conventio n, but it has its uses. First of all, in connection with mathematics, attention is s hifted away from any so-called “mathematical objects” which might be suppos ed to lead an “ex- istence” outside of math itself. Thus sets need not have any P latonic “reality”, and there need not even be mention of an outside real world to w hich an ap- 5plied mathematics might refer. Such considerations are obv iated and one may ask merely whether or not a given string of symbols is to be use d. Secondly, as illustrated by musical scores, language is the n a very general notion. There need not be a uniquely determined relationshi p between the symbols and what the language refers to. It is merely the poss ibility of some connection being adopted that justiﬁes asserting that a lan guage is in use. This last observation might bring to mind the search for alie n intelligent life in the universe. Clearly one cannot presume, beforehand, to know the language used by an undiscovered race of beings. Nevertheless, if a ra dio source, for example, were to exhibit an unexpected and physically unexp lained regularity it would not be surprising for there to be conjectures of an in telligent source for the “signal” and attempts to decipher the language utilized in its construction. It seems, then, that the above deﬁnition of language is the on ly one which adequately addresses the way in which the term is commonly us ed, although it doesn’t give a constructive idea of what a language may be lik e or what it may be about: Language is deﬁned by those who use it. It is the intention of this thesis to explore language in as ge neral a way as possible by specifying the least restrictive and most natur al system of writing the author has conceived of. It is hoped that a convincing treatm ent of this symbolic system itself will shed some light on the ways in which one und erstands those “things” to which language refers. 1.2 Motivation and Historical Review Before entering upon the developments particular to this th esis, an overview of some relevant prior work in the areas of Linguistics and Cogn itive Science, of Metamathematics, and of Physics will be given. The results i n these ﬁelds will indicate some plausible expectations for the work to be pres ented here, but this will also be an opportunity to indicate the points of diverge nce between this thesis and the perspectives advocated in other work. 1.2.1 Linguistics and Cognitive Science The form of modern Linguistics and Cognitive Science has bee n strongly inﬂu- enced by the work of Chomsky1. This work is foundational in the sense that, even for those that disagree with it, it is ultimately necess ary to justify any serious theory in this area by how it relates to Chomsky’s app roach and results. What, then, are some of Chomsky’s conclusions about human la nguage? Language, according to Chomsky, is a discrete combinatoria l system; “A ﬁnite number of discrete elements (in this case, words) are s ampled, combined, and permuted to create larger structures (in this case, sent ences) with properties that are quite distinct from those of their elements. For exa mple, the meaning ofMan Bites Dog is diﬀerent from the meaning of any of the three words inside 1An introduction to this work, as well as references to more te chnical expositions, can be found in [1]. 6it, and diﬀerent from the meaning of the same words combined i n reverse or- der.”2This may be contrasted with so-called “blending systems” wh erein “the properties of the combination lie between the properties of its elements, and the properties of the elements are lost in the average or mixt ure. For example, combining red paint and white paint results in pink paint.”3Given that the properties of the elements of a blending system are lost in a c ombination, it can hardly be sensible to attempt to formulate general statemen ts about a mixture in terms of its elements. Conversely, in a discrete combinat orial system the ele- ments may be recovered from their combination and general ru les may be given for the formation of such combinations. The rules for the combination of the elements of a discrete co mbinatorial system are called its “grammar”. “A grammar speciﬁes how wor ds may combine to express meanings; that speciﬁcation is independent of th e particular meanings we typically convey or expect others to convey to us.”4The utilization of a grammar is dependent upon the categorization of words into p arts of speech: “A part of speech, then, is not a kind of meaning; it is a kind of token that obeys certain formal rules, like a chess piece or a poker chip . ... When we construe an aspect of the world as something that can be ident iﬁed and counted or measured and that can play a role in events, language often allows us to express that aspect as a noun, whether or not it is a physical o bject. For example, when we say I have three reasons for leaving , we are counting reasons as if they were objects. Similarly, when we construe some asp ect of the world as an event or state involving several participants that aﬀect one another, language often allows us to express that aspect as a verb. For example, when we say The situation justiﬁed drastic measures , we are talking about justiﬁcation as if it were something the situation did, though again we know that j ustiﬁcation is not something we can watch happening at some particular time and place.”5 Because grammar operates on categories of words it gives sen tences a mod- ular structure which may be described, as is familiar from Co mputer Science6, by “production rules”. For example, a noun phrase consists o f an optional de- terminer, followed by any number of adjectives, followed by a noun. A sentence consists of a noun phrase followed by a verb phrase. A verb phr ase consists of a verb followed by a noun phrase.7It will be noticed that in these rules the order of the parts of speech within the (written) sentence is cruci al to the correct application of the grammar. Languages in which the grammar m ay really be given in this form are called “isolating languages”. Such a s cheme is not always carried out, however. In so-called “inﬂecting” languages, such as Latin, the spelling of the words themselves is modiﬁed in order to reﬂec t the role they play within the sentence. as is done in the conjugation of verbs. W hen such cases are provided it is possible to rearrange the words within a se ntence and still 2See pg. 84 of [1]. 3See pg. 85 of [1]. 4See pg. 87 of [1]. 5See pg. 106 of [1]. 6See [2]. 7See pg. 98 of [1]. 7determine the role played by each word. English is, in fact, p artially isolating and inﬂecting. It is clear, however, that any inﬂected langu age may be rewritten in a particular order so that it may be interpreted as an isola ting language, and the generality of the notion of grammar given above is thus re tained in all cases. The notion of grammar indicated so far allows a diﬀerent form of production rule for each kind of phrase or part of speech within a given la nguage, and also allows for variation in the grammars of distinct languages. It has, however, been found8that all grammatical rules within a given language, as well a s all grammatical rules within all languages, may be put in a st andard form. This constitutes Chomsky’s theory of a Universal Grammar. T his empirically discovered independence of grammar from the particular cul ture in which it is used has been asserted to justify the claim that language abi lity is an inherited and intrinsic property of individuals. The inheritance of g rammatical language ability has further been argued to explain the rapidity and p articular way in which children learn language. Thus one aspect of linguisti c analysis indicates an inherent component of language and calls into question th e degree to which one can discern the properties of a truly external world. More generally, the inherent aspects of language may be asse rted to hinge, in part, on the notion of similarity. The identiﬁcation of word s as being of partic- ular parts of speech constitutes recognizing a kind of simil arity, and, moreover, the generalizing of speciﬁc examples to general rules which is necessary for learn- ing also requires the identiﬁcation of a similarity. The pro blem is that similarity is apparently in the mind of the beholder: “Suppose we have th ree glasses, the ﬁrst two ﬁlled with colorless liquid, the third with a bright red liquid. I might be likely to say the ﬁrst two are more like each other than eith er is like the third. But it happens that the ﬁrst glass is ﬁlled with water a nd the third with water colored with by a drop of vegetable dye, while the secon d is ﬁlled with hydrochloric acid- and I am thirsty.”9This points to a boot-strap problem if one is to be able to learn and not have some inherent sense of si milarity. It may be observed, then, that pre-existing notions of similar ity are posited by the cognitive scientists in order to solve the old philosophica l problem of induction. Another observation in Linguistics and Cognitive Science p oints to a diﬃ- culty in speaking of a real external world. Here the observat ion has to do with the metaphors that people use in language. It has been found t hat there are two basic metaphors in language10: that of location in space and that of force, or cause. The ﬁrst may be illustrated by the sentences: “Minn ie told Mary a story. Alex asked Annie a question. Carol wrote Connie a lett er.” Thus “Ideas are gifts, communication is giving, the speaker is the sende r, the audience is the recipient, knowing is having.”11Force as a metaphor may be illustrated with the following pairs of sentences: “The ball was rolling along the grass.” and “The ball kept on rolling along the grass”. “John doesn’t go out of the house.” and “John can’t go out of the house.” “Larry didn’t cl ose the door.” 8See pg. 111 of [1]. 9See pg. 416 of [1]. 10See pg. 354 of [3]. 11See pp. 353-354 of [3]. 8and “Larry refrained from closing the door.” “The diﬀerence is that the second sentence makes us think of an agent exerting some force to ove rcome resistance or overpower some other force. With the second ball-in-the- grass sentence, the force is literally a physical force. But with John, the force is adesire : a desire to go out which has been restrained. Similarly, the second La rry seems to house one psychic force impelling him to close the door and another that overpowers it.”12 The sentences above can hardly seem unusual, and the pervasi veness of such metaphors is readily discovered. Indeed, “space and force a re so basic to lan- guage that they are hardly metaphors at all.”13Space and force are, however, integral parts of the description of physical reality. If, a s the above quota- tions suggest, these concepts are building blocks of langua ge itself, then what is the necessity of an external reality anyway? How may refer ences to reality be distinguished from any other kind of reference if such phy sical terminology is (perhaps) always in use? This discussion of Linguistics and Cognitive Science may be summed up as follows: There is reason to doubt that Cognitive Science has arrived at a clear distinction between language and the external reality whic h it, presumably, describes. This would be diﬃcult to do, of course, but it is st ill somewhat unsatisfactory that it seems to be no help on this point. Neve rtheless, it takes a realist position in speaking of a real world and reasoning t hat humans must have an inherent ability to recognize similarities in order to be able to deal with ambiguous data, as in the example with the glasses, which isn ’t just in the mind. This pre-existing faculty for classiﬁcation extends to the common possession of a Universal Grammar which operates on ordered strings of sym bols, and which is the foundation for communication. This grammar may be giv en in terms of production rules, in a canonical form, for the manipulation s of a ﬁnite discrete combinatorial system. In any event, it is clear that Linguis tics and Cognitive Science have led to the conclusion that language may be under stood in terms of a formal symbolic system. The consideration of formal sys tems in and of themselves, apart from consideration of any external physi cal “reality”, is the domain of mathematics, so this will be the next subject surve yed. 1.2.2 Metamathematics The modern study of formal systems within mathematics is ref erred to as meta- mathematics, the study of which originated with David Hilbe rt14. “Metamath- ematics includes the description or deﬁnition of formal sys tems as well as the investigation of properties of formal systems. In dealing w ith a particular for- mal system, we may call the system the object theory , and the metamathematics relating to it the its metatheory . From the standpoint of the metatheory, the object theory is n ot properly a theory at all ... but a system of meaningless objects like th e positions in a 12See pg. 354 of [3]. 13See pg. 357 of [3]. 14For a leisurely exposition of metamathematics see [4]. 9game of chess, subject to mechanical manipulations like the moves in chess. The object theory is described and studied as a system of symbols and of objects built up out of symbols. The symbols are regarded simply as va rious kinds of recognizable objects. To ﬁx our ideas we may think of them con cretely as marks on paper; or more accurately as abstracted from our experien ce with symbols as marks on paper. ... The other objects of the system are only analyzed with regard to the manner of their composition out of the symbols. By deﬁnition, this is all that a formal system shall be as an object of study for me tamathematics. The metatheory belongs to intuitive and informal mathemati cs (unless the metatheory is itself formalized from a metatheory, which he re we leave out of account). The metatheory will be expressed in ordinary lang uage, with mathe- matical symbols, such as metamathematical variables, intr oduced according to need. The assertions of the metatheory must be understood. T he deductions must carry conviction. They must proceed by intuitive infer ences, and not, as the deductions in the formal theory, by applications of stat ed rules. Rules have been stated to formalize the object theory, but now we must un derstand with- out rules how these rules work. An intuitive mathematics is n ecessary even to deﬁne the formal mathematics. ... The methods used in the metatheory shall be restricted to methods, called ﬁnitary by the formalists, which employ only intuitively conceivab le objects and performable processes. No inﬁnite class may be regarded as a complete whole. Proofs of existence shall give, at least implicitly, a metho d for constructing the object which is being proved to exist. This restriction is requisite for the purpose for which Hilb ert introduces metamathematics. Propositions of a given mathematical the ory may fail to have a clear meaning, and inferences in it may not carry indub itable evidence. By formalizing the theory, the development of the theory is r educed to form and rule. There is no longer ambiguity about what constitute s a statement of the theory, or what constitutes a proof in the theory. Then the question whether the methods which have been formalized in it lead to c ontradiction, and other questions about the eﬀect of those methods, are to b e investigated in the metatheory, by methods not subject to the same doubts as t he methods of the original theory.”15 According to the above characterization, metamathematics achieves clarity of meaning and deﬁniteness of implication for the object theory , but the object theory is not all of mathematics. The undeﬁned metatheory forever remains as an exterior criterion of the acceptability of the formalize d object theory, and it is thus implicitly impossible, according to this standpoin t, to ever arrive at a complete notion of mathematics which is both clear in its mea ning and deﬁnite in its implications. It is clear, however, that this scheme a llows a progressive clariﬁcation and development of the formal scheme. What, th en, has been achieved along these lines? It has been indicated that the object theory is judged from th e perspective of the metatheory; Thus the metatheory must, if the meaning o f statements 15This excellent and authoritative quote may be found on pp. 62 -63 of [5]. 10in the object theory is to be deﬁnite, deﬁnitely classify eac h statement in the object theory as being either acceptable or not. This classi ﬁcation is achieved by a mapping of each statement in the object theory onto eithe r “True” or “False”; This mapping is called the “interpretation” of the object theory. It is clear, then, that from the metamathematical perspective th e notion of truth is contingent upon there being a separate metatheory which det ermines, via an interpretation, what is to be true. Metamathematics is also supposed to make the acceptability of proofs of an assertion manifest, where a proof is a formal derivation of a true statement. For- mal operations, being rules for the combination of meaningl ess symbols, can, in themselves, only lead from one combination of meaningless s ymbols to another and thus make one such combination depend upon another. Once an interpre- tation is provided, however, there is hope that certain form al operations may preserve the initial truth value in a progression of formal c ombinations leading to the statement it is desired to prove. Such a proof is not abs olute, but rather expresses the truth of the conclusion as being contingent up on the truth of the initial statement in the derivation. This method cannot rem ove the ultimately contingent nature of such proofs, so that certain statement s cannot be proven but may only be assigned the value “true” according to the int erpretation. Such statements are called “axioms.” The truth-preserving form al rules would then be termed “correct”. Those statements which may be proven ar e termed “the- orems.” The axioms and the particular proof theory applied to an obje ct theory are determined by the metatheory. Thus, from the metamathemati cal perspective, once a formal system is chosen, formal mathematics boils dow n to the selection of the axioms and the formal rules for carrying out proofs. No w it will be noticed that, once axioms and the formal rules for proofs are given, t he formal system inherits an order leading from axioms to theorems. The direc tion and extent of this order will be determined by the axioms and proof system. There is thus a correspondence between the rules for proof accepted by the metatheory and some ordinal number. Such a selection cannot, in the above se nse, be proven correct but may only be a matter of preference. The choice mad e in modern mathematics may, for the most part, be said to be for ﬁrst orde r logic with proof based on the acceptance of arguments by induction, in the usu al sense, on the integers, the integers having ordinal number ω16. What is the result of this chosen perspective? Hilbert’s ori ginal motiva- tion in proposing the metamathematical approach was to show , at least, that mathematics was both “consistent”, so that no false stateme nt may be proven, and “complete”, so that any true statement may be proven. As i s well known, G¨ odel17dashed the hopes for the fulﬁllment of this program when he sh owed that, for any object theory which may model arithmetic and fo r which induction is deﬁned to be over the integers, it may be proven that the obj ect theory is both incomplete and cannot be proven to be consistent. It wil l be illuminating 16For a critical discussion of this standpoint see [6]. 17See either of [4] or [5]. 11to proceed at this point to a discussion of the role of judgeme nts based on the metatheory in the proof of the ﬁrst of these assertions. The key to the proof of these results lies in the notion of G¨ od el number- ing. G¨ odel numbering encodes statements in ﬁrst order logi c as numbers in the arithmetic system which is formalized. Such numbers may the n be arguments of predicates in the formal system so that it becomes possible, from the metamath- ematical perspective, to interpret some such statements as being self-referential. In particular, G¨ odel was able to construct a statement G suc h that from the metamathematical perspective G asserts that G is not a theor em in the object theory. It then is found to be impossible to prove G. This may b e explained as follows: It is asked whether or not G is a theorem. If it is, t hen G, being a theorem, must assert a truth. G, however, according to the me tatheory, asserts that G is not a theorem, so this is a contradiction. If the obje ct theory is to be consistent then this alternative must be rejected. On the ot her hand, supposing G is not a theorem, it then follows, again according to the met atheory, that G asserts a truth. Then, since G is both true and not a theorem of the object theory, it follows that the object theory is incomplete. Now G being true entails its negation being false, and, false statements being underivable, it follows that neither G nor its negation may b e a theorem of the object theory. G is thus an “undecidable” proposition; It’s a statement the object theory can make no assertion about, one way or the othe r. In order to remedy this “hole” in the object theory it is necessary that t he object theory be amended so that it adopts either G or its negation as a new ax iom. The ﬁrst option, usually referred to as being the standard one, i s straight-forward enough. The second alternative, referred to as the non-stan dard one, it turns out, requires the augmenting of the object theory with a new c lass of symbols and a corresponding reinterpretation of predicates to admi t the new class of symbols. This option points directly to an extension of the f orm of the object theory, as is illustrated by the reformulation of the Calcul us within non-standard analysis18. The interesting thing about non-standard analysis is that it allows rigorous deﬁnition and manipulation of inﬁnite and inﬁnite simal quantities. It is clear, in any event then, that G¨ odel’s Incompleteness Th eorem, rather than merely being prohibitive, may be fruitful as well. It should be carefully noted that the metamathematical basi s for G¨ odel’s theorems was, in part, the acceptance of induction over the i ntegers. While this is the standard approach, it is worth noting that G¨ odel’s th eorem asserting the unprovability of consistency may be refuted if one is willin g to accept transﬁnite induction over a larger ordinal. It has been shown that induc tion over an ordinal known asǫ0allows a consistency proof to be carried through19. In conclusion, the discussion of metamathematics has revea led a number of things. Metamathematics sets out, ﬁrst of all, on the dual basis of an ob- ject theory and a metatheory. While the object theory is form alized so that acceptable statements may be deﬁnitely recognized, the met atheory, which jus- 18See [7]. 19See [8]. 12tiﬁes and interprets the object theory, is not necessarily f ormalized at all. The metatheory operates on an intuitive basis, which, in part, i s simply a way of saying that the way that the metatheory operates is undeﬁned . There is a par- allel here between human language and physical reality on th e one hand, and the object theory and the metatheory on the other. Proceedin g nonetheless to consider the implications of this approach, it is found th at the interpretive role played by the metatheory leads to the usual notions of tr uth and proof in an axiomatic mathematical system. Proof theory introduces a notion of order in the object theory. There is also a consequent parallel bet ween the kinds of inductions accepted for proofs and the size of ordinals that must be admitted in the object theory. G¨ odel’s theorems then show that despite the deﬁniteness of the notions of truth and proof which metamathematics utiliz es, the presumably categorical power of these notions doesn’t obtain. It does, nevertheless, point to a limitless ﬂexibility in the formation of the formal syst em. This ﬂexibility is manifest in the extensibilty of the system of axioms and in th e potential variety of variable types that may be constructed in non-standard th eories. Inﬁnities and inﬁnitesimals, for example, naturally ﬁnd their way int o the formal sys- tem in this way. This ﬂuid nature of the formal language of met amathematics suggests that if any comprehensive conclusions about the re lationship between reality and language are to be arrived at, they might not deri ve from the given form of a language, but may be justiﬁed by a systematic refera l to an exterior reality instead. For this reason attention now turns to an ov erview of Physics. 1.2.3 Physics Science is distinguished from other mental pursuits by its r ecourse to experi- mentation, this, it may be said, being a systematic procedur e for determining how to use language to refer to “experience”. While “reality ” is a scientiﬁcally indeterminate word, it is supposed that, via experimentati on, Science refers tosomething other than a formal symbolic game20. Thus the exploration of Physics will begin with a discussion of experimentation, th e scientiﬁc method. The scientiﬁc method may be described in a number of steps. Fi rst there is Observation. In this phase of the process it is simply assert ed that something is noticed in the “outside world” and this something is described . It is important to note, right away, that science therefor deals with that wh ich, though taken to come from outside of the linguistic apparatus, is, nevert heless, describable within this system. After Observation comes a stage in which Questions may be for mulated. Here the essential activity is that of trying to guess at any p ossible connec- tions between diﬀerent aspects of the physical situation an d the particular phe- nomenon noticed in the previous step. In other words, an atte mpt is made to imagine ways in which the occurrence of the noticed phenomen on might depend on other physical events which then would precondition it. L oosely stated, this amounts to seeking causes for the observed eﬀect. It should b e noted that such 20The notion of reality, from a quantum-mechanical perspecti ve, is discussed in [9]. 13questions, like the observed phenomenon, arise in an undeﬁn ed way, as saying that such ideas are found by using one’s imagination does not deﬁne imagination itself. It is also worth noting that any presumed cause, like any other condi- tion which may be distinguished, cannot always obtain; a ter m which always applies is not descriptive. Under these conditions it is at l east conceivable that a supposed cause and the observed eﬀect may be related. The third stage of the scientiﬁc method is the formulation of a Hypothesis. The Hypothesis is a clearly stated trial explanation for the observed phenomenon chosen, according to best judgement, from the possibilitie s considered in the previous stage. This step is also undeﬁned; it is simply a jud gement call. It is clear that, from the scientiﬁc perspective, it cannot mat ter how questions or hypothesis are formed. The only thing that can matter is the u sefulness of these questions and hypotheses once they are “found.” The fourth step is to carry out a controlled Experiment. This means that a well deﬁned series of pairs of physical situations is creat ed such that in the ﬁrst member of each pair the supposed cause obtains while the other half of the pair, called the control, is a situation which is identical t o the ﬁrst except that the supposed cause does not obtain. Having created these ini tial conditions, the experiment consists in waiting to see, and noting in each cas e, whether or not the eﬀect to be explained occurs. It is presumed that any ”rea l” cause would be in eﬀect during these trials and would show itself, at leas t sometimes, in the eﬀect occurring in the non-controls and not occurring in the controls. Any hypothetical cause is accepted or rejected accordingly. The ﬁnal stage in this progression of the scientiﬁc method is that of Theo- rizing. Those relationships which pass the experimental st ep are taken, at least provisionally, to be factual. These relationships are then thought about (an- other undeﬁned step) and an attempt is made to create a mathem atical theory which comprises all of these relationships. This theory may make predictions as to what will happen in experiments not yet performed, and t his becomes a test for the theory itself to pass. In any event, having cycle d through these ﬁve stages, Science always returns to the ﬁrst to look for new obs ervations. A number of questions may be raised concerning the adequacy o f the sci- entiﬁc method outlined above. The world being tremendously complex, which phenomena are worth observing? Since phenomena, in order to be observed in the above sense, must be described, doesn’t this precondi tion what may be observed? Might it not be a consequence of this that only phen omena which are suﬃciently simple may be observed? If the number of hypothes es that might ex- plain an eﬀect is not ﬁnite, doesn’t it follow that the experi mental investigations might run themselves into a small corner in the sense of restr icting the way the world is viewed by scientists? And might it not happen that ex periment never checks all hypotheses which might explain a given eﬀect? The scientiﬁc response to these issues may be inferred by examining Newton’s Rules o f Reasoning in Philosophy21. While these rules do not constitute a formal oath of oﬃce for all scientists, it may be fairly asserted that they do reasonabl y reﬂect the practical 21See Part III of [10]. 14attitude of most scientists. Newton’s Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy are: Rule I: We are to admit no more causes of natural things than su ch as are both true and suﬃcient to explain their appearances. Rule II: Therefor to the same natural eﬀects we must, as far as possible, assign the same causes. Rule III: The qualities of bodies, which admit neither inten siﬁcation nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong to all bod ies within the reach of our experiments, are to be esteemed the universal qu alities of all bodies whatsoever. Rule IV: In experimental philosophy we are to look upon propo sitions in- ferred by natural induction from phenomena as accurately or very nearly true, notwithstanding any contrary hypotheses that may be imagin ed, till such time as other phenomena occur, by which they may either be made mor e accurate, or liable to exceptions. Rule IV refers to “natural induction”, and it should be noted that this term has been the subject of much debate. For the purposes of the ar gument to follow, this phrase will be replaced by “experimentation”. This see ms reasonable as, after all, Newton’s rules are being interpreted and applied , rather than merely cited. Newton’s ﬁrst rule begins by subordinating causes to eﬀects : Particular causes may be admitted only if they explain observed eﬀects. However, it should be clearly noted that causes are otherwise unrestricted by N ewton’s rules and it is nowhere indicated how one is to choose among many particul ar causes which might explain a particular eﬀect. It is only asserted that if one of these causes is acceptable according to experiment, and is therefor “tru e”, then it may be adopted. This is in agreement with a minimal interpretation of the experimental procedure outlined above. It is clear then that both the experimental method and Newton ’s commen- tary on it leave the acts of observation, questioning, and hy pothesizing without limits deﬁned prior to experimentation. It follows from thi s that no limits, in principle, may be asserted to apply to the eﬀective range o f experimental method save any which may restrict the formof statements and hypotheses so that they are subject to controlled experiment. Thus the sci entiﬁc method is not restricted to investigate only particular observation s, and there is no bar to future eﬀects necessitating the abandonment of previous causes, as is indi- cated explicitly in Rule IV, so that experimental investiga tion need not lead to a narrow outlook. It is not necessary that all hypothetical c auses be checked. What may be said about the form of statements about experimen tal obser- vations and causes? It may be observed that the experimental method would be fruitless if it were merely the case that all observed eﬀec ts were in one-to- one correspondence with causes, for then there would be no co nceptual gain in speaking of causes: Note here that even in a deterministic ph ysics, where predic- tion may in principle be perfect and invertible, an addition al idea of the passage of time is involved. Thus, in general, eﬀects are not equival ent to causes though they proceed from them. Furthermore, if the description of e ﬀects is not to be 15superﬂuous, then their number must be ﬁnite; In a descriptio n of an inﬁnity of elements terms could be omitted and still one would retain a d escription which may correspond to the original. Appealing to Rule I then, it i s clear that both causes and eﬀects may and must be representable by a ﬁnite num ber of ﬁnite numbers, and this may be taken to be the form that experiment r equires state- ments adopt. This conclusion is implicit in Newton’s Rules I II and IV where the “qualities of bodies” are spoken of as being “accurately or very nearly true” and it is said that the “universal qualities” of bodies “admi t neither intensiﬁca- tion nor remission of degrees”. That physical quantities ar e to be represented by ﬁnite numbers is not explicit in the previous deﬁnition of the experimental method, though it is an unspoken canon of scientists. Consider now Rule II: It is, as Newton asserts, a consequence of Rule I. It goes beyond Rule I in pointing out that physical explanati on shall therefor be universal in that all phenomena must be viewed within a sin gle framework. In fact, Rule II has the eﬀect of imposing the requirement tha t no part of the universe, nor any aspect of its activity, may be consider ed forever isolated from the rest, as in that case the isolated part would be consi dered physically irrelevant through not having eﬀects which experiments nee d address. This then also justiﬁes Newton’s third rule, and Rule II furthermore s erves as a constraint on theory, pushing physicists towards uniﬁcation. The discussion thus far has focused on experiment as a method of analyzing experience but it hasn’t yet been shown that this method, as o pposed to the methods of linguistics and metamathematics, results in any thing other than a formal symbolic game. Does the scientiﬁc method really acce ss something sepa- rate from language itself, some external reality? In order t o address this question the ﬁnal aspect of the scientiﬁc method, that of theory, will be considered next. There is a well-known understanding of the relationship bet ween theory and experience: “Every theory can be divided into two separate p arts, the formal part, and the interpretive part. The formal part consists of a purely logico- mathematical structure, i.e., a collection of symbols toge ther with rules for their manipulation, while the interpretive part consists o f a set of “associa- tions”, which are rules which put some of the elements of the f ormal part into correspondence with the perceived world. The essential poi nt of a theory, then, is that it is a mathematical model , together with an isomorphism between the model and the world of experience (i.e., the sense perceptio ns of the individual, or the “real world” - depending upon one’s choice of epistemo logy).”22. Here again, as was the case with Linguistics and Metamathematics , there is a sep- aration between experience and language, and where that sep aration is to be found, is, ultimately, intuited rather than deﬁned. If the separation between the real and the merely formal is no t deﬁned a priori, then perhaps, as a minimum, that separation is at lea st deﬁnitely stated in contemporary physics. Contemporary physics is, for the m ost part, quantum theory, and the mathematical model of quantum theory was giv en, essentially, 22See pg. 133 of [11]. 16by von Neumann23. Rather than discuss the intricacies of this model it is suf- ﬁcient for current purposes to note here that calculations i n this formalism are of two types: “Process 1” calculations which apply whenever new experimen- tal data are acquired in “measurements”, and “Process 2” cal culations which apply for those times in the interim between measurements24. This distinction in the formal operations of the theory clearly and formally d istinguishes “real” data from merely formal variables. This formal separation w ould unquestion- ably draw a deﬁnite line between the “real” and the formal if i t weren’t also the case that the interpretation of the model leads to diﬃcultie s25. These diﬃcul- ties, known as the “measurement problem”, have lead to a vari ety of elaborate attempts at resolution26, but, as yet, none are uniformly accepted. Contemporary physics, having failed at clearly separating formalism and “reality”, may even be doubted to have adopted any such separ ation in the ﬁrst place, instead almost reducing physics to formalism. T o begin with, it has been shown, by those studying “Quantum Logic”, that the form al apparatus of quantum theory need not be motivated by experiment, but is, r ather, a formal embodiment of the propositional calculus27. The reduction of physics to for- malism, it may be argued, is further supported by a founder of quantum theory, Niels Bohr, in the following comparison of quantum and class ical physics: “In the case of quantum phenomena, the unlimited divisibility o f events implied in such an (classical) account is, in principle, excluded by the requirement to specify the experimental conditions. Indeed, the feature of wholen ess typical of proper quantum phenomena ﬁnds its logical expression in t he circumstance that any attempt at a well-deﬁned subdivision would demand a change in the experimental arrangement incompatible with the deﬁnition of the phenomena under investigation.”28( italics mine). As to the concept of a physical condi- tion, Bohr seems to be identifying it with, if not replacing i t by, its formal description. Some may yet feel that these points are exagger ated and merely “philosophical”, and do not really apply to practical physi cs. In answer to this it is suﬃcient to turn consideration to the modern theory of q uarks, for quarks are supposedly fundamental constituents of physical descr iption motivated by experiment, and, at the same time, are subject to “conﬁnemen t”. Thus, while quarks are believed to “exist” they cannot, in principle, ev er be seen! Quarks can impact experimental results only indirectly, and are th us primarily products of theory and not observation. Beyond formalization of the “existence” of external realit y, science has even gone so far as to attempt the formalization of the individual s themselves who have experiences, so that none could speak of anything which isnotformal. This program may be seen to be a consequence of Science’s prev iously men- 23See [12]. 24See pg. 3 of [11]. 25For a quick description of these diﬃculties see pp. 3-10 of [1 1]. For a selection of some diﬀerent ways of viewing the quantum formalism also consult pp. 181-195 of [13]. 26See [14]. 27For an overview of this formalism see [15]. For an in depth tre atment see [16]. 28See pg. 4 of [17]. 17tioned drive towards universality. According to von Neuman n: “... it is a fundamental requirement of the scientiﬁc viewpoint - the so -called principle of the psycho-physical parallelism - that it must be possible s o to describe the extra-physical process of the subjective perception as if i t were in reality in the physical world - i.e., to assign to its parts equivalent phys ical processes in the ob- jective environment, in ordinary space.”29The physical world being formalized, as indicated above, it then follows that individual experie nce ought to be as well. Along the lines of deterministic theory, work in Computer Sc ience has produced Turing machines as well as other apparatus of Artiﬁcial Inte lligence30. von Neu- mann went so far, in his theory of self-reproducing automata , as to formalize deterministic machines that would carry on many of the forma l operations of life-forms31. von Neumann also addressed non-deterministic theory by sh owing that nearly deterministic behavior may be synthesized by th e parallel organiza- tion of non-deterministic elements32. Consequently it is now common practice in physics to, in eﬀect, replace observers by Turing machine s33. The above discussion has fairly well summarized the results of contemporary physics. A review of physics, then, indicates that Science a ttempts to answer the need for specifying a deﬁnite interpretation of its form alism through experi- mentation. The nature of the experimental procedure itself indicates that there are no necessary restrictions to the range of the interpreta tions thus derived, though such investigations are formally restricted to meas urements expressible by ﬁnitely many ﬁnite numbers. Science is concerned with hav inganexplana- tion of observations, but by no means need there be a unique ex planation or theory. In fact, theories need not arise solely or uniquely f rom experiment ei- ther, as is illustrated in the case of quantum theory. This fr eeing of theory from strict correspondence with observation has resulted in mod ern physical theory being almost totally formal in nature. It has also left in que stion the degree to which anything besides a formalism is required or even speci ﬁable. 1.3 A Departure from Prior Approaches Having surveyed Linguistics and Cognitive Science, Metama thematics, and con- temporary Physics, an attempt will now be made to glean any wi sdom common to these disciplines. Some of those things which these disci plines have in com- mon will be found to hold in the symbolic system developed her e. Particular aspects speciﬁc to some of these areas will also feature in th e pages to follow. And, as it will also be observed, there is a similarity in the d iﬃculties facing these theories which will be an important indicator of a poin t of departure which distinguishes the theory developed here from previous deve lopments. It may be recalled that each of the noted areas does make use of written 29See pg. 418 of [12]. 30See [4] for a basic coverage. For detailed theory consult [18 ]. 31See [19]. 32See [20]. 33See pg. 64 of [11]. 18discrete combinatorial systems. Manipulations of these sy stems were, in all cases, speciﬁed by clearly stated formal grammars. In apply ing grammars rules were in eﬀect according to the category of symbols being mani pulated, there being no concern for any particular additional meaning atta ched to the symbols. This lends a certain rigor to these manipulations, but, in al l cases, there was also an appeal made to an intuited level of interpretation and jus tiﬁcation which, in the case of Physics at least, yields confusion if not contrad iction. In no case was there an a priori clear division between what is to be merely f ormal and what is to be intuited. The study of Linguistics additionally pointed to the partic ular relevance of the order of written symbols while also noting that the Unive rsal Grammar may be taken to derive from an intuited notion of similarity or ca tegorization. Con- sideration of Metamathematics taught that the notions Trut h and Proof aren’t as categorical as might be formally desired, but that they ar e instead grounded, ultimately, in a choice of interpretation of the symbolism. Surprisingly, meta- mathematics, instead of demanding rigid and ultimate truth s, requires an in- ﬁnite ﬂexibility in an allowed step-wise extension of any su ﬃciently complex formal system. This extension results in, among other thing s, a rigorous def- inition of inﬁnities and inﬁnitesimals. Experimentation, which was discussed in order to curtail this embarrassment of riches, demands, i nstead, operating with ﬁnite quantities, but still hasn’t categorically solv ed the problem of the interpretation of the formalism. A concern common to all of the above considerations is, given that lan- guage is to play a role at all, the need for precisely determin ing the proper role and extent of the respective formalisms. In this connec tion Wittgenstein’s dictum34, that that which cannot be said ought to be passed over in sile nce, seems pointedly relevant. It may, however, be pointed out th at he who would wholely reject the relevance of language can hardly statehis case! Furthermore, it is hardly possible to describe that which is outside of language. It seems, besides, that language ought to play some part in our experie nce as without such interpretation that experience is, arguably, a chaoti c jumble. None of this, however, resolves the diﬃculties encountered above wherei n language referred to something in addition to itself. The notion that language might be able to represent and refer to something outside of itself might seem questionable. Perhaps such a conceptio n is even self-contradictory, yet one might also conclude that empty formalism is the only alternative to such an approach and feel thereby driven to in fer some external “physical” basis for, or content of, language. Re-examination of the nature of the axiomatic approach will suggest, however, that this is a false dichotomy and that one might instead adopt a third viewpoint which embr aces none of the arbitrary formalisms such as have arisen in pure mathema tics and yet also avoids such problematic combinations of intuition and form alism as have arisen in Physics. The considerations to follow outline such a re-e xamination and give an overview of the argument to be presented at length in the re mainder of this 34For an overview of Wittgenstein’s philosophy see [21]. 19thesis. Recall that one lesson of G¨ odel’s Incompleteness Theorem i s that any suﬃ- ciently powerful axiomatic system will have “holes” corres ponding to undecid- able propositions. There are no stated constraints on how su ch “holes” may be ﬁlled so that, in general, no axiom system is formally preferable to an- other. Usually one is thus led to recognize the limitations a nd arbitrary nature of the axioms of any particular metamathematical system. Not withstanding this result the axiomatic method is still employed by both ma thematicians and physicists alike in order to draw deﬁnite conclusions from d eﬁnite premises. The formal symmetry in the admissibility of distinct axioma tic theories is usually broken either as a matter of taste, as in the case of pu re mathematics, or via reference to experiment, as in the case of applied mathem atics and Physics. That the relationship between empirical data and formal str uctures is indeﬁnite has perhaps already been plausibly indicated and will be fur ther advocated in Chapter 2. Any plausibility in these observations argues ag ainst the second means of identifying relevant formalisms though it cannot, by any means, prove that such a rejection is mandatory. If such a course is adopte d, it yet remains toformally characterize the “physically relevant” structures within the formal theory. In this connection it may be anticipated that the pre sumed indeﬁniteness in the empirical relevance of particular formal structures, together with the previously discussed physical requirement that “measurem ents” be expressible as ﬁnite collections of ﬁnite (real) numbers, leads to the ex pectation that the ﬁniteness of data might be the onlypossible formal requirement that could characterize an empirically relevant symbolism. This obse rvation identiﬁes an interesting class of formalisms to be investigated and give s some hope of success in replacing the empirical method with a strictly formal one . The role of experiment being at least questionable, the axio matic method yet remains arbitrary in that distinct and incompatible axi omatic systems are, in themselves, of equal standing. The selection of anyparticular collection of axioms being arbitrary, it would seem that any acceptable non-empirical symbolic method must be non-axiomatic. In light of this it ma y be asked how one is to determine a self-suﬃcient and constructive symbolic method. An answer: Rather than thinking of G¨ odel’s Incompleteness Th eorem as being a constraint on particular axiom systems it is instead possible to interpret it as being a critique of the axiomatic method itself. Such a criti que is a statement of what the formalisms of all such distinct axiomatic system s have in common . The acceptability of such a statement suggests that the form al manipulations of a non-axiomatic system be taken to be those compatible wit h the adoption ofanyparticular axiomatic system. This may also be thought of as r equiring that the formal manipulations demanded by any given axiomat ic system may be thought of as special restricted cases of the application of the formal rules of the non-axiomatic system. Such restrictions in the appli cability of formal manipulations are determined by the axioms of the given axio matic system so that such systems must be embeddable in the non-axiomatic sy stem. The axioms of such embedded formal systems may be thought of a s summa- rizing the “truths” of the experiences of particular indivi duals so that, if this 20identiﬁcation is made, it may be seen that the formal rules of the non-axiomatic system then ought to be consistent with the testimony of “obs ervers”. If such an identiﬁcation is to be made then it remains to at least plausi bly illustrate that the “realistic” structure of everyday language may neverth eless be thought of in terms of, and justiﬁed by, the strictly formal consideratio ns of a non-axiomatic theory. In this sense the formalism may be said to generate it s own interpre- tation. Such a development, which coincides with an intuiti ve categorization of symbols such as Linguists infer in the operation of the Uni versal Grammar, is given in Chapter 3. Accepting such an identiﬁcation then a llows the deriva- tion of the formal manipulations of the non-axiomatic syste m to be carried out, beginning with Chapter 4, in an intuitively plausible manne r. It should be noted that the non-axiomatic formal approach, b y deﬁnition, does not presume that axioms may not be adopted, but, rather, attempts to investigate what is common to all such axiom systems. Deﬁnit e conclusions correspond, as always, to deﬁnite axioms. While a non-axiom atic theory may make note of such connections it cannot endorse any conclusi ons as being cat- egorically “true”. Conversely, any deﬁnite results must be those that may be derived on the basis of some axiomatic theory. If this is kept in mind it should be clear that this thesis can never make claims that one must n ecessarily accept, nor can it include formal manipulations that amount to proof s in the absense of reference to any axioms. In this sense a non-axiomatic the ory may be said to be based upon the notion of contingency rather than truth. It may also be noted that, in accordance with the notion of a non-axiomatic theory, all non- axiomatic theories may be considered to be identical. Thus t he formal structure ofthenon-axiomatic formal system will be identiﬁed in this thesi s as being that of the General Symbolic System. In order to make the above ideas clearer it may be helpful to ma ke a detour in order to compare these ideas with some other historically important ideas not already discussed. It seems plausible, ﬁrst of all, that if the non-axiomatic method is to be self-suﬃcient, then it might proﬁtably be com pared to the approach of various mathematical schools of thought. This c omparison will then lead to a consideration of some of the philosophical ide as of Wittgenstein. Historically, there have been three main schools of mathema tical thought, namely: Formalism, Logicism, and Intuitionism. It is easy t o quickly point out diﬀerences between the non-axiomatic method and the app roach of each of these schools. Formalism has already been discredited by G¨ odel, but the symbolic method to be developed here manifestly diﬀers from Formalism in the sense that there is to be no object theory separate from any in tuitive metathe- ory. Logicism attempts to construct all of formal mathemati cs starting from a propositional system of assertions, assertions such as tha t a particular mathe- matical object has a particular property. The point of diver gence between the approach developed here and that of Logicism is, as is explai ned in section 5 of Chapter 3, that the general symbolic system doesn’t adopt an y particular kinds of mathematical objects as being such ﬁnal categories. Fina lly, the Intuitionists are known for their rejection of the notions of mathematical inﬁnities and of the Law of the Excluded Middle, which mandates that all state ments are either 21true or false. The above approach, while evidently sharing t he Intuitionistic attitude to truth, will distinguish itself from Intuitioni sm in fully embracing formal inﬁnities. Having distinguished the desired formalism from that of all standard math- ematical schools of thought it would seem that the above idea s are on very philosophically shaky ground. In this vein it will be intere sting to consider some of Wittgenstein’s ideas. One of the foundational goals of Wittgenstein’s philosophy35is to prevent the imprecise use of language. Wittgenstein felt, in fact, t hat with a precise understanding of language there could be no questions, prop erly speaking, that could not be answered. In such a case the long-standing parad oxes of philosophy would have to therefor be rooted in an improper use of languag e. While his later philosophy attempted to explore language empiricall y36, and is therefor apparently to be rejected here, his earlier philosophy, lik e the program to be pursued here, attempted to understand the nature of experie nce through an analysis of pure formalism37and therefor might be akin to the ideas to be developed here. Although Wittgenstein’s early ideas do proceed from a Logic ist viewpoint, they will nevertheless be discussed. Wittgenstein espouse d the idea that lan- guage gave a “picture” of reality, wherein the structure of l anguage exactly mirrored the structure of an external reality. Wittgenstei n thus postulates a neumenal world of ideas, similar to Plato’s idea of forms, pa rallel to a physical reality. Such an approach diﬀers from the theory to be develo ped here in nec- essarily speaking of an external reality, and it seems suspi cious that language and physical reality might coincidentally have identical s tructures, but the fact that the nature of language is to exactly determine the natur e of experience is nevertheless quite similar to the idea that, in the general s ymbolic system, the formalism generates its own interpretation. In further elaborating his idea of the “picture” Wittgenste in came to the conclusion that physical reality is, like ordinary written language, composed of atomic elements corresponding to those symbols representi ng ideas which are not further analyzed. In accordance with his Logicist views he also, therefor, came to the conclusion that language, and therefor physical reality also, is ulti- mately tautological in nature, there being no a priori way to distinguish atomic elements of reality. This led him to later reject the results of these investigations because he could not reconcile the complete symmetry betwee n the atoms of his neumenal world and the apparent diversity of the physical wo rld. Wittgenstein’s early ideas may be compared to those of this t hesis in the following way. While the structure of language is the only st ructure there will be that maybe discussed in the general symbolic system, it is not presum ed in the developments to follow that there will be atoms in the sym bolic system into which all other expressions may be analyzed. Such an analysi s amounts to a proof in a formal system, while such atoms correspond to axio ms. The general 35Refer again to [21] for a discussion of Wittgenstein’s philo sophy. 36These ideas were published posthumously in [22]. 37Wittgenstein’s earlier philosophy is given by him in [23]. 22symbolic system rejects, by deﬁnition, such a conclusion. I nstead of this, as is explained in section 9 of Chapter 7, the considerations of th e general symbolic system will lead to ﬁnite levels of description which may be further elaborated to an arbitrary degree of complexity. Additionally, accept ance of the methods of this thesis leads, unlike Wittgenstein’s early work, to t he development, in Chapter 7, of a purely formal symbolic system to a point where the structure of language apparently doesaccurately reﬂect the diversity of experience. This is all that will be said of Wittgenstein’s ideas here, and dis cussion now returns to an overview of the mode of development of the general symbo lic system. Beyond the synthetic deﬁnition of, and presumed uniqueness of, the general symbolic system, it remains to indicate the particular form al manipulations which it should adopt. Here it suﬃces to generalize the forma l rules of a par- ticular simple axiomatic system as, after all, such structu re must be embedded in the general symbolic system itself. Such a requirement is , as is indicated in Chapter 4 beginning with section 4, not merely restrictive, but decisive: The general symbolic system embeds the formal structure of Latt ices and is thereby identiﬁed to be a division ring with a partial order. The notions of conventional mathematics are developed with a bias in fa- vor of ﬁnite quantities, this perhaps being associated with the atomism which corresponds to proofs in axiomatic theories. The methods of the Calculus, in their reliance on the ǫ-δdeﬁnition of a limit, are a case in point. Though ﬁ- nite quantities are perhaps favored by empiricists, no such preference is to be found in the basis for the development of the general symboli c system. Both for the sake of its own development, as well as for the sake of m aintaining its comparability to the usual mathematics, Chapter 5 is devote d to the task of generalizing, within the general symbolic system, the form al operations of the Calculus. This generalization takes particular advantage of the non-commuting “multiplication” of the general symbolic system and thus ec hoes the stress which Linguistic analysis laid on the importance of the notion of o rder in language. Furthermore, Chapter 6 takes advantage of the generalized C alculus in order to arrive at some ﬁnal conclusions as to the algebraic nature of the formal rules of the general symbolic system. With all that has been said above, it should still be recalled that the purpose of the development of the general symbolic system is the inve stigation of the possibility that a purely formal, yet non-axiomatic, theory might never theless have a structure which yields predictions which agree with e xperiment. Such a program may be thought of as follows: If it fails, then this m ight be taken as a “proof” that experiment is needed in order to “cause” phy sical theory to correspond to experience. If it succeeds, however, then it i s diﬃcult to see how such a cause may be asserted to be necessary: Occam’s Razor ar gues against such a supposition. As already noted above, the presumed formal characterization of empiri- cally relevant symbolic structure is that of the ﬁniteness o f such symbolic struc- tures. As the formal rules of the general symbolic system are taken to have been completed in Chapter 6, the ﬁrst six sections of Chapter 7 are dedicated to exploring such special structures within the general sym bolic system. This 23investigation leads to novel derivations of the formalisms of both General Rel- ativity and Quantum Theory, as well as unsurprising charact erizations of each as corresponding, respectively, to invertible and non-inv ertible manipulations of symbols. In so far as the empirical results of all of modern ph ysics is conven- tionally taken to be encompassed within these formalisms it might perhaps also be concluded that the general symbolic system, in conjuncti on with the condi- tion of structural ﬁniteness, has succeeded to the same exte nt as empiricism in yielding an accurate determination of the nature of experie nce. In the seventh section of Chapter 7 it is argued that the natur e of the derivations of the Relativistic and Quantum-theoretical f ormalisms indicates that, if such is possible, all ﬁnite structure may be represe nted within either of these complementary schemes, though, as is characteristic of the non-axiomatic method, such a conclusion should not be thought to have been proven to be mandatory. The next section of Chapter 7 inclines, in fact, t o the conclusion that such ﬁnite structures are formally incompatible. Resolving this conﬂ ict presumably requires either the consideration of non-ﬁnite formal structures or resorting to empiricism. As the non-axiomatic method is conceptually consistent wit h adopting non- ﬁnite formal structures, the feasibility of adopting this ﬁ rst resolution of the above diﬃculty is investigated in the last section of Chapte r 7. These consid- erations lead to the plausible conclusion that the Relativi stic and Quantum- theoretical formalisms may be extended, in a mutually consi stent manner, by the methods of Non-Standard Analysis. In particular, the fo rmal manipulations of the general symbolic system are to be governed by bothof the formalisms of Relativity and Quantum Theory, the only diﬀerence between t his and the ﬁni- tary case being that the symbols are no longer required to be ﬁ nite in general. Established non-standard methods are then used to illustra te the relationship between this extended formal system and the usual ﬁnitary fo rmalism which is thus embedded within it. As a ﬁnal observation, the role which Non-Standard Analysis plays in pre- sumably reconciling Relativity and Quantum Theory as parts of the general symbolic system suggests that an identiﬁcation may be made b etween the no- tion of the externality of the “physical reality” which ﬁnit e empiricism forever appeals to and the presumed conceptual inadequacy of any ﬁni te structures within the general symbolic system. If this identiﬁcation i s made then, it is proposed, these two approaches may be thought of as being ind istinct. While it would be inconsistent with the very notion of a non-axiomati c theory to demand such an identiﬁcation, nevertheless it is hoped that such an identiﬁcation might make rejecting serious consideration of such systems less l ikely. 24Chapter 2 A SCHEMATIC OVERVIEW OF PHYSICS 2.1 Introduction The introductory chapter has provided a general orientatio n and motivation for the approach to be taken in this paper. The primary question r aised by the discussion there is the necessity of language referring to a n external “reality” even in such an objective discipline as Physics. Before proc eeding to the formal development of the theory it will be helpful to re-examine, i n a practical and more detailed way, the functioning of the scientiﬁc method, including the actual style of activity of both individual kinds of physicists and some of the historical development of Physics itself. It is hoped that then, after h aving more com- prehensively illustrated the dubiousness of there having b een a clear distinction between formalism and “realism” or empiricism, it will be po ssible to proceed more convincingly with the formal development to follow. 2.2 The Ideal Relationship Between Theory and Experiment The growth and functioning of modern Physics can be understo od in terms of a symbiotic relationship between two general activities of physicists: That of theory construction on the one hand, and that of observation on the other. Theoretical physicists make predictions as to what will hap pen next in a given situation, and thus explain such events whenever they ’re successful. The- oreticians also attempt to encompass as many conceivable si tuations as possible within as few distinct predictive schemes, or theories, as p ossible. Physics thus progresses whenever theoretical physicists are able to con struct a theory to ex- plain phenomena not previously understood, to predict new p henomena, or to 25“unify”1old theories by creating a single theory which explains what was pre- viously explained by two or more old ones. This activity yiel ds a kind of uniﬁed understanding of the world. Theoreticians can’t claim to have ever explained everythin g, nor can it rea- sonably be claimed that all of their predictions have been te sted or conﬁrmed. Apparently, the world is too uncooperative for that. There h as thus been a deﬁnite role to be played by physicists who don’t merely pred ict, but who also observe. Some of the terms used to describe these observations repeat edly occur in varying combinations. The recurrence of such “events”, whi ch usually have relatively simple descriptions, apparently gives an oppor tunity for an exhaus- tive and methodical exploration of a part of experience. Thi s exploration is undertaken by the experimental method. By adopting conventions for the terms to be utilized in descr iption it becomes possible to compare observations and thus to engage in “meas urement”. The recurring conditions which deﬁne events also identify part s of description which refer to “measuring devices”. Measurement, by organizing d escriptions in a conventional form, serves to help determine the extent to wh ich theory succeeds, and even the failure of theory to explain a measurement still represents an advance for Physics, for it increases knowledge of the world and gives new challenges to the theoreticians. It should be clear, then, that theory and observation recipr ocally beneﬁt the understanding which physicists aim for. Theory, as conﬁrme d by experiment, serves as a basis for prediction and speciﬁes and clariﬁes wh at is known, while observation identiﬁes what is yet to be understood whenever unexplained mea- surements arise. In any event, theory cannot fruitfully den y the observations made in experimentation. 2.3 A Realistic Examination of the Behavior of Scientists While, as just indicated, there are certainly mutually bene ﬁcial aspects to the relationship between theory and experiment which, in a mann er of speaking, drive the engine of Science forward, there are also conﬂicts which arise in their interplay. This is, in part, because it is often diﬃcult to re cognize and accept when a previously successful system of concepts can no longe r be relied upon when attempting to understand new experiences. It may even b e said that theory preconditions what is noticed. There is a consequent on-going tension between groups of physicists, each comprising a school of th ought, when their theories are faced with the extensive variety of experiment al data. This tension may be seen in the debates between such schools of thought. 1Hereafter the convention is adopted that the quotation of a w ord or phrase which is used, in context, in a deﬁnite sense will, if applicable, be p resumed afterwards to indicate the deﬁnition of that word or phrase. 26For this reason the sketch of the activities of physicists ma de in the last section, in stressing the mutually beneﬁcial aspects of the relationship between theory and experiment, bears some further development. To t his end some further general remarks about theory will be made, and it wil l be shown that physical debate has taken a predictable form. In a physical theory prediction is a strictly mathematical o peration: Given certain mathematical objects representing what is known, i n the form of initial and boundary conditions, parameters, and physical constan ts, the theory then generates, in a well-deﬁned way, other mathematical object s which are supposed to tell something of what is to happen later, in the future. Th e predicted future, in being derived from what is currently known, cannot be any m ore precisely deﬁned than what is already known. Now the transformation by which the known thus yields predictions may or may not be invertible. I f it is invertible, then prediction may be said to be a sort of relabeling, and phy sicists would, in this sense, know exactly as much about the future as they kn ow about the present. It is usually otherwise, the future being somewhat less accessible than the present. When a theory’s predictive transformation is n ot invertible, when the future is somewhat indeﬁnite, then prediction may be sai d to be “statistical”, by deﬁnition. This consideration helps to explain the way in which experim ents are, in fact, interpreted. If a theory yields, apparently, more inf ormation about the future than the past, then it may be concluded that some of the description of what is known is superﬂuous or physically irrelevant. If, al ternately, prediction is less accurate than statements of the known, then, it being desirable to know the future as completely as possible, this deﬁciency may be a ttributed to the world being essentially statistical in nature, to a defect i n the physical theory, or to an inadequacy in the determination of what is known by me asurement. Exactly one of these factors must be the culprit, for it would be fruitless and ambiguous to maintain more than one independent cause for th e same eﬀect. Physicists who don’t believe the world to be essentially sta tistical and who have faith in the physical theory would then assert that ther e “really” are more comprehensive initial data from which one could make better predictions. They would then advocate attempts to measure such data or assert t hat statistical methods are resorted to for practical reasons. Such has been the case for Clas- sical Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics. Physicists who accept such a physical theory and the initial data must assert that the world is essentially statistical in nature. This ha s been the position of adherents to Quantum Theory as exempliﬁed by Niels Bohr’s Co penhagen In- terpretation. Bohr, while not denigrating all of the result s of the non-statistical General Relativity Theory, nevertheless rejected its meth ods and maintained the adequacy, or “completeness”, of the statistical Quantu m Theory. If a physicist accepts the adequacy of the initial data but re jects there be- ing any essential indeﬁniteness in the world, then they are c ompelled to fault a physical theory which makes statistical predictions. Thi s was Einstein’s re- action to Quantum Theory. Einstein couldn’t easily accept t he idea that “God plays with dice”, and so he spent his last years searching for a generalization 27of his relativistic theory which could account for quantum p henomena without necessitating an essential randomness in the world. Such a t heory would then replace Quantum Theory2. Most physicists today fall into one of these last two groups, but neither camp can claim a deﬁnitive victory so long as Quantum Theory and Ge neral Relativity can each claim unique successes and still resist uniﬁcation . Each position was advocated in the famous Bohr - Einstein Debate. It is commonl y believed that Bohr won this debate, and Quantum Theory enjoys a correspond ing popular approval among physicists, but this is a position maintaine d by practical success and not, as indicated above, a position proven to be unassail able. In fact there still remains controversy over the interpretation of Quant um Theory, and so Relativists may remain “convicted, but not convinced”. The notion of a statistical prediction has led to an overview of physical procedure and been useful in comparing the canonical school s of thought in contemporary physics. It has done even more: It has convinci ngly shown that each school of thought is oﬀering a diﬀerent solution to the s ame problem of the meaning of physical theory, and that the debate between t hese schools has taken a predictable form. 2.4 A Criticism of the Role of Experiment The preceding analysis has highlighted the diﬃculty in uniq uely interpreting the relationship between theory and experiment, and the con sequent disputes that have arisen. Now experiment is merely a particular real m of experience to which language may address itself. In fact, according to N iels Bohr3; “...by the word ‘experiment’ we can only mean a procedure regarding which we are able to communicate to others what we have done and what we hav e learnt.” Thus language must, in general, possess the same ambiguity o f interpretation as Physics if experimentation is still uncritically referr ed to. Before carelessly accepting such an implication it would be best to critically examine the role of experiment in physics. This will be done in the following and it will lead to some interesting conclusions. The deﬁning virtue and test of Science is its ability to predi ct, where pre- diction, properly speaking, is a matter of telling what will happen in an experi- ment that has never been done before. Such a prediction can on ly be based on something which is presumed independently of the experimen t actually being performed. Such prior knowledge comprises physical theory and may also be taken to deﬁne “reality” itself. In order that Science may claim permanent relevance it is nec essary that the supply of new experiments be inexhaustible, and thus inﬁ nite in number. It follows that reality may, in this sense, be said to be inﬁnite as well. It would contradict the deﬁnition of reality, however, if observati ons were to be said to 2For Einstein’s presentation of his physical beliefs see [24 ]. For an independent and in- depth appraisal of Einstein’s realism, see [25]. 3See pg. 3 of reference [17]. 28create reality: “Acts of observation”, in so far as such a ter m is used at all, must correspond to entirely unpredictable events. Because a physical theory and the corresponding notion of re ality must be presumed in order to make predictions, it is impossible, esp ecially by experi- ment, to prove its correctness. It may, however, be “falsiﬁe d”4by its inability to make acceptable predictions. Consider, for example, the experimental results that are in accordance with Newton’s Theory of Gravitation. These same results are in ac cord with Ein- stein’s Theory of Gravitation as well, so that the same exper imental data have received two quite distinct theoretical explanations. Fro m an empirical stand- point, Einstein’s theory is distinguished from Newton’s in that it is able to naturally account for additional phenomena which Newton’s theory can address only with great diﬃculty if at all. Einstein’s theory is in th is sense scientiﬁcally preferable to Newton’s, although there can be, as indicated above, no empirical guarantee that future observation won’t favor another theo ry over Einstein’s. There cannot, therefor, be a direct path from experiment to t heory, and consequently no way to empirically determine which individ ual theoretical as- sumptions are to be made or rejected in the construction of a t heory: It is necessarily the theoretical system as a whole which must con front experiment. This indicates a kind of miracle, for any physical theory, in cluding those that agree with experiment, must then be constructed in a way that has no well- deﬁned connection with experimental results. Considering the nebulous relationship between theory cons truction and the results of experimentation, it may well be wondered whether or not an attempt to construct physical theory without reference to experime nt could be successful. In fact, if experiment is to be relied upon then it, in being in exhaustibly novel, can never allow for a ﬁnal physical theory. In other words, a p ermanent role for experiment implies that physical theory forever be provisi onally acceptable at best, and that there can be no place for necessity in Physics. Conversely, if deﬁnite conclusions are desired, then it is u ltimately necessary to ignore experiment in the construction of physical theory . This may seem like a heretical idea, but it is the only choice to make if, instead of rejecting the idea out of hand, it is desired to determine if physical theory can be constructed in this way. This is a worthwhile question to resolve, so this pr esumption will be made at this point. Summing up then, it is usually assumed that there are two sepa rate realms to be recognized: Physical theory and the reality to which it refers. Experience is then supposed to guide the construction of the physical th eories which de- scribe it, but it has been argued that there cannot be any defe nsible systematic procedure for incorporating the results of experiment into a physical theory. Accepting this conclusion leads to the realization that phy sical theories must therefor be miracles of independent creation which, nevert heless, do make pre- dictions that agree with experiment, at least provisionall y5. This being the case, 4For a detailed discussion of this notion see reference [26]. 5For an extensive argumentation as to the freedom allowed in t heory construction in 29it must then be possible to create physical theory without ut ilizing any experi- mental results whatsoever, and thus to abolish considerati on of experimentation as a realm separate from physical theory itself. Science, consult [27]. 30Chapter 3 THE UNIFICATION OF LANGUAGE AND EXPERIENCE 3.1 Introduction In order to follow the course set out in the last chapter it wil l be necessary, ﬁrst of all, to indicate how a language which makes reference to experiences need not, in fact, be referring to anything outside itself. T his may be done by indicating how the “realistic” way in which language is used may be interpreted in a strictly formal sense. If this is to be done convincingly then a number of intuitively understood terms must be given explicit formal roles within language and the structure which is normally thought to be found withi n a reality exter- nal to language, as indicated in language itself, must be sho wn to have a strictly formal derivation. The discussion in this chapter will be ca rried out in con- ventional language and will be, in this sense, metamathemat ical. This should not, however, lead to the same diﬃculties indicated in the ﬁr st chapter. This is because it is proposed that the formal system to be developed is not an “object language” which is separate from and subordinate to convent ional language, but is, rather, equivalent to it. In other words, it is not presum ed that the language developed is a formal language which may be intuitively judg ed in relation to a metalanguage, but instead the language itself is designed to incorporate and symbolize the intuitions of individuals. This is the condit ion which, as has been indicated, is required by the identiﬁcation of the axiomati c systems embedded within the general symbolic system with the testimony of ind ividuals. 313.2 Individuals and Language Whatever applies to the relationship between theory and exp eriment will also aﬀect the more general relationship between language and ex perience. In par- ticular, the choice just made in the last chapter requires th at experience not be considered separate from language itself. Nevertheless, l anguage still contains statements referring to that which is experienced, and so su ch statements must remain intelligible. Thus statements about experience mus t be both accommo- dated and yet denied to refer to a separate category outside o f language. This may seem paradoxical. The unique solution to this diﬃculty which is adopted here is to identify the recognized signiﬁcance of any statements made by indivi duals about their experiences with these statements themselves, so that such statements may be taken be a natural development within the language itself. T hen all statements may be made in the form of references to experiences and yet no such separate realm need be recognized. Any “separation” will be a feature of the language itself. This identiﬁcation has a number of consequences. As all statements in language might be the assertions of some individual at some particular instant, it would seem to follow that all sta tements must have realizations in experience. However, because such stateme nts, being merely strings of symbols, can only be judged according to their for mal properties, it follows that while it may be intuitively appealing to base th e considerations to follow on realistic explanations and examples, such an ap proach may be misleading, for it is easy to forget that such examples are, t hemselves, only to be judged according to their formal properties. The develop ments to follow will, accordingly, be kept, so far as seems reasonable, strictly f ormal and abstract. It is evident that great care must be taken in dealing with sta tements about experience from an individual perspective. The delicate ma tter of constructing a strictly formal symbolic system which nevertheless accomm odates the testimony of individuals is the task taken up next. 3.3 Perception and Meaning The construction of the symbolic system starts, as indicate d above, from the perspective of a single individual. It is assumed that the re ader is an individual and therefor may understand the meaning of the terms “reader ” and “individ- ual” without a deﬁnition being provided. It may be said that the symbolic system is to be utilized by thi s individual for the purpose of comprehending his experiences. In keeping wi th the individual perspective it may also be said that symbols may be utilized i n the description of experiences at a particular instant. The developments to follow will be based on the consideration of the description of experiences at a p articular instant, and the symbols will be said to identify what is experienced. The sense, if any, of these terms beyond their purely formal utilization is left t o the reader’s insight. Description will be provided by the combination of written s ymbols. The 32assignment, by an individual, of certain symbols to a partic ular instant will be said to comprise an act of “perception.” Such symbols will , in virtue of this assignment, be said to have been made “meaningful” to this in dividual. Because a given symbol either deﬁnitely does, or does not, appear in a given statement, it follows that a given symbol is, or is not, meaningful to an i ndividual at a particular instant. Moreover, not all symbols need be meani ngful. Because written symbols may themselves be said to be experie nced, it nec- essarily follows that perception may result in symbols bein g assigned, by an individual, to other symbols. This “meta-labeling” provid es a means of inter- relating symbols because any symbols assigned to the same sy mbol are, in virtue of this very fact, grouped together. Such symbols may be said to be “associ- ated.” The association of symbols just mentioned raises the questi on of whether or not the development of the symbolic system can give anything distinct from set or class theory. In these theories the “existence” of sets or classes is required so long as they don’t violate any of the formal axioms of the th eory. Such “existence” has not been mandated here, for the written stri ngs of symbols are thus far presumed to correspond to testimony, and be merely g iven, and are not required by some formally stated rules to be formed. So long a s this remains the case such an identiﬁcation would be unjustiﬁed. This point w ill be returned to later, in the derivation of physical theories, where a condi tion for the existence of associations between symbols will be given. 3.4 An Important Illustrative Example The meaning of a particular symbol is, at best, a necessarily private matter. It is not generally possible to say “what” a particular meaning ful symbol means. It is only possible to note that certain symbols are consiste ntly assigned to others. This situation may be made intuitively as well as for mally clear with an example involving two hypothetical individuals, Joe and To m, say, who may be supposed to refer to certain symbols common to both of them. Let it be supposed that the symbols “stop signal” and “apple” may be re- ferred to by both Joe and Tom, and that each indicates to the ot her that he takes these symbols to be meaningful. Now “stop signal” and “ apple” may be, for the sake of argument, assigned in Joe’s mind to an experie nce identiﬁed as “A”, while “go signal” is assigned in his mind to the experien ce indicated by “B”. It is not generally presumed that an individual’s mind m ay be read like this, but this ﬁction is indulged in just to make a point. Even supposing that Tom shares the same experiences to which “A” and “B” refer, it is perfectly admissible for Tom’s corresponding e xperiences to be the reverse of Joe’s. Joe and Tom could then agree in saying that t he symbols “stop signal” and “apple” both refer to things which are “Red” and o ther things, such as the “go signal” may be agreed to be “Green”. However, Red wo uld then be assigned to the experience A in Joe’s mind and to the experien ce B in Tom’s. The reverse would be the case for Green. 33Any system of symbols corresponding to experience will acco mmodate such examples, and will therefor share in this indeﬁniteness as t o the meaning of particular symbols. If, then, a symbol is supposed to have a d eﬁnite meaning, then this meaning must be established solely within an indiv idual’s mind. It is possible, however, to establish deﬁnite relations between symbols. In the above example, in fact, the convention was reached that the meta-l abel Red was to have the symbols “stop signal” and “apple” assigned to it. The categories arrived at, such as Red and Green above, can be useful con- ventions which are stipulated according to some symbols hav ing some meaning in common. In this case the red things have, according to both Joe and Tom, common meanings. Joe takes red things to share the meaning A, while Tom sees red things as sharing the meaning B. Again, this does not mean that red has the same meaning for Joe and Tom. Such categorizations are always strictly provisional: the re are no ﬁnal cat- egories and there can be no mention of necessary truths. In th e above case it can never be asserted, for example, that there cannot be a s ymbol, such as “Fire Truck” which is not linked in Joe’s mind to the experien ce A. This may be because “Fire Truck” isn’t meaningful to Joe. It may be the case that Tom wouldn’t assign “Fire Truck” to the experience A either. It m ay also be the case that Tom may never have the experience A and so never be able to understand why Joe associates “apple” and “stop signal” as being “red” b ut doesn’t group “Fire Truck” under this metalabel. The usage of a particular symbol, such as red, can only be justiﬁed and stipulated solely by individua ls, so that it can never be asserted that a particular symbol need apply to a par ticular experi- ence. Distinct individuals may merely agree or disagree in t heir assignment of symbols. The most precision with regard to meaning that may be expecte d of lan- guage, then, besides its including individual symbols of in deﬁnite meaning, is that it also provide for the construction of provisionally r elevant relations or groupings of symbols. The meta-labeling system discussed s o far diﬀers from the system of the usual formal logic in that it is not based on r elations with a ﬁxed and known number of “arguments”. Meta-labeling allows just such deﬁ- nite but ﬂexibly chosen connections between symbols to be es tablished in writing as to give partial exposition of the relations it represents . The speciﬁcation of which symbols are associated by a given meta-label identiﬁe s a deﬁnite structure without, as is necessarily the case, making the meaning of an y symbol evident. Language, in not being reliably able to convey a separate mea ning, is thus seen to be strictly “formal” in nature. 3.5 The Development of Language and the No- tion of Truth How are languages to be judged? If the way in which symbols are combined in writing, and which combinations are to be allowed, is esta blished once and 34for all, then it may be said that a particular well-deﬁned lan guage is in use. It otherwise is possible to arbitrarily amend the relations ex pressed by the language and, in this sense, the language will have been changed. Give n various symbols which are connected, by meta-labeling, in deﬁnite ways, it i s generally possible to give deﬁnite rules, called the “grammar”, for how such sym bols may be combined in written expressions. Expressions which satisf y the rules may be said to be “correct.” It is thus necessary that a well-deﬁned language have a grammar. If given more than one language, how may they be compared? Cer tainly the comprehensiveness of a language is a primary consideration . Can a language be shown to be comprehensive? If a language is developed to the point where several symbols may be consis- tently associated by a meta-label, then this meta-label may be said to identify a particular “thing”, and those symbols which it usually asso ciates may be taken to be “properties” of that thing. Once this may be done multip le times, it may then be said, in a strictly formal sense, that these certain t hings “exist” to which the language refers. Properties may be assigned to diﬀerent things, although, as indicated before, such categorizations need not be permanent nor are they nece ssary. Assertions, relative to these adopted conventions, may then be made in th e language, these assertions taking the form of indicating that a thing does or does not have a particular property assigned to it. The assertion, by an ind ividual, that a thing has a particular property is, like all perceptions, an actio n which can have no necessary external justiﬁcation. Even the individual hims elf may not provide a reason for a thing to have a property. The property is simply a part of the perception of the thing itself. The discussion above, in showing that the notion of an assert ion or “proposi- tion” may be derived from the metalabeling which perception results in, should help to make clear the relationship between the theory herei n developed and the approach of the school of thought known as “Logicism”. Fo r, though the formal propositional apparatus from which Logicism procee ds has been shown to arise within the theory, nevertheless it must not be thoug ht that the theory is equivalent to such an approach. A diﬀerence between the two approaches may, in fact, be disce rned by con- sidering the old philosophical issue of the discussion of a p articular object such as, for example, a chair. Whereas a logicist would, by the ver y nature of his approach, be constrained to assert that a chair does, “objec tively” speaking, have certain properties, the approach espoused here starts from describing the perceptions of a given individual, and therefor does not dismiss, at the outset, the possibility that individual perceptions may diﬀer. Con sidering a case of discussion of the color of the chair in which some individual s “are” color blind should make clear the primary role of convention , in which individuals “agree to agree”, as opposed to objective truth, and therefor also ind icate an advantage of the present theory over Logicism. While, failing such agree ment, eﬀective dis- cussion might be impossible, nevertheless undercutting th epossibility of such disagreement can only be justiﬁed by arbitrarily dismissin g some perceptions in 35favor of others. Despite the above observations, if the descriptive system i s greatly devel- oped then it may contain many things and many assertions abou t them. Such a suﬃciently developed system might exhaust all of the writt en statements any individual is likely to make in a lifetime. Such a system, in v irtue of its com- plexity, might be deemed comprehensive, but, it may be asked , does it “tell the truth”? Because experience, as a realm separate from language, has b een abolished from consideration, there can be no way to judge a language ap art from its formal properties. Thus there can be no external criterion o n which to base an assertion of the truth-value of a statement. The only possib le assertion of the adequacy of a language that may be sought, then, is in arguing that the language is, in its own nature, capable of representing any written re lation. It is also worth noting that in rejecting the notion of truth there can conseq uently be no worry about consistency, nor can G¨ odel’s Incompleteness Theore m necessarily apply. The way in which statements “about experience” can be made in a language without the necessity of an external realm of experience has been discussed. It has been found that the notions of things, properties, and assertions about things can be given purely formal characterizations. The no tion of intrinsically true statements must, in the context of a non-axiomatic theo ry, be abandoned, but it is still reasonable to talk about the descriptive adeq uacy of a language. 36Chapter 4 BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SYMBOLIC SYSTEM 4.1 Introduction The last chapter addressed the way in which experiential sta tements may be given purely formal interpretations. There certain terms w ere introduced and certain arguments made, but it was not addressed how various formal manip- ulations were to be decided upon. Such a formal development o f the general symbolic system is begun in this chapter. 4.2 Reserved Symbols and the Formal Nature of Language It is not possible, as has been demonstrated, to in any way pre judge which symbols may play a role in individual perception in the gener al symbolic system. If the identiﬁcation of meaningful symbols is left entirely to the individual, then the symbolic system must be such that, for any correctly writ ten expression, each potentially meaningful symbol may be replaced by anoth er to yield a new expression which may take on, according to individual perce ption, the same meaning as the last. This may be thought of as a recoding of the previous expression. This recoding will be the ﬁrst aspect of the symb olic system to be speciﬁed. In the written symbolic system symbols will be distinguishe d simply by their appearances as written; ’a’ is, for example, distinct from ’ b’ in this sense. This will be indicated by writing a /ne}ationslash=b. It is important to note that no “equality” has been deﬁned here. 37The convention will be adopted that writing a /ma√sto→b will indicate that the symbol ’a’ is to be replaced by ’b’ whenever it appears in a wri tten expression. Suppose, for example, that a /ma√sto→c and b /ma√sto→d. If this is done in such a way that if any pair of images, such as ’c’ and ’d’, are such that c /ne}ationslash=d then the corresponding pre-images, such as ’a’ and ’b’, are also such that a /ne}ationslash=b, then the replacement eﬀected will be said to be a “relabeling”, it being presumed t hat relabelings are deﬁned on all symbols. It will never be the case that x /ne}ationslash=x for any symbol ’x’, and there is no re- quirement that an image and its corresponding preimage be di stinct. Thus a given symbol may be retained under a given relabeling and, in fact, under all relabelings considered. The symbolic system thus allows th at certain symbols may be used in the same way in all expressions in diﬀerent rela belings. In this way it is possible to always retain particular symbols to pla y ﬁxed roles in the symbolic system, but it has not been necessary to stipulate t he “existence” of symbols as necessarily given: Such “reserved symbols” may b e conventionally set aside for such use. Both ’ /ne}ationslash=’ and ’ /ma√sto→’ will be taken to be reserved symbols. Consequently, given a relabeling in which a /ma√sto→b and c /ma√sto→d, an expression such as a/ne}ationslash=c will be replaced by b /ne}ationslash=d, it being presumed that /ne}ationslash=/ma√sto→ /ne}ationslash= by convention. It can be seen that having reserved symbols is the key to the ad option of a conventional language in which symbols are always used in t he same way. Ironically, then, it is the very indeﬁniteness of the meanin g of any symbol which will allow a language with rigid rules of combination, with a deﬁnite grammar, that is, to be constructed. In other words, the meaninglessn ess of language will be what allows a deﬁnite “formalism” to be used. 4.3 Partial Order and Formal Structure In the last section it was found that the indeﬁniteness of the meaning of symbols provided a key to introducing reserved symbols which are ado pted convention- ally and allow for the possibility of a deﬁnite language bein g used. It will now be shown that the meta-labeling between symbols engenders a certain structure which may be explicitly indicated in the language through th e use of reserved symbols indicating an order relation between symbols. The m eta-labeling also will provide a deﬁnite means of combination of individual sy mbols, thus leading to the notion of an “expression”. Consider the assignment of one symbol to another. In the exam ple involving Joe and Tom both ’apple’ and ’stop signal’ were assigned to ’R ed’. It may also have been the case that some symbol had been assigned to ’appl e’, and some other symbol assigned to that, and so on. This chaining of the connections between symbols motivates a deﬁnition. It will be said that ’x’ is a descendent of ’y’ iﬀ either ’x’ is assigned to ’y’ or ’x’ is assigned to a descendent of ’y’. Obviously this is a recursive deﬁnition which is not constru ctive in the sense that a deﬁnite end to the recursion is not to be expected for an y reason for- 38mally indicated. The assignment of symbols is not, however, something to be questioned: It may be said that it is contradictory to presum e that individu- als could stipulate such connections in an act of perception and not be able to identify any chain of assignments which would identify desc endents of a given meta-label. With this deﬁnition of descendents it is then possible to con struct an order relation between meaningful symbols. It will be said that ’x ’ is “less than or equal to” ’y’, written x ≤y, if ’x’ is a descendent of ’y’ or if it is ’y’ itself. ’x’ will be said to be “equal to” ’y’, written x = y, if both x ≤y and y ≤x hold. Clearly, if x = y then y = x. If x ≤y but x = y doesn’t hold, then x <y will be written. It will also be convenient to adopt the following convention s: x≤y may also be written as y ≥x, and x<y may be written as y >x. The symbols ≤,≥,<, and> are taken to be reserved symbols. Only the structural relationships indicated by meta-label ings can have any signiﬁcance within the formal system, and these relationsh ips may be conveyed by the reserved symbol ≤. Suppose, for example, that a ≤b, a/ma√sto→c, and b /ma√sto→d. Then (a ≤b)/ma√sto→(c≤d), so that the meta-labeling structure between the pre-ima ges ’a’ and ’b’ is inherited by the images ’c’ and ’d’. For this rea son it may be said that the images are used “in the same way” as the correspondin g pre-images. Because, again, only the meta-labeling structure can be of f ormal signif- icance, and because the symbol ’=’ indicates an “equality” b ased on meta- labeling, it follows that any two symbols ’x’ and ’y’ such tha t x = y may be substituted for one another anywhere within an expression. Thus meta-labeling is the source of “the principle of substitution.” With these deﬁnitions it is clear that ≤satisﬁes the standard deﬁnition of a “partial order”: x≤x for every x. (4.1) x≤y and y ≤z implies that x ≤z. (4.2) x≤y and y ≤x implies that x = y. (4.3) If, for meaningful x and y, either x ≤y or y ≤x, then x and y will be said to be “comparable”. Any system of meaningful symbols, all of whic h are comparable, will be said to form a “chain” and it may also be said that the or der≤is then “total” for these symbols. Along with the notion of a partial order there will also be an a ssociated notion of a “bound”. Given two meaningful symbols x and y, any symbol w such that w ≤x and w ≤y will be said to be a “lower bound” of x and y. There need not be any lower bounds of x and y, but there may also be man y. Among such w there may be at most one unique “greatest” one, denoted by x∧y, such that e ≤x∧y for any lower bound e. It will be noticed that the string of symbols x ∧y stands for a single symbol determined by meta-labeling with respect to the two symbols x and y. Thus x∧y is to be considered as a kind of unit. In order to make this cle ar it will be convenient to introduce the reserved symbols ’(’ and ’)’ and write (x ∧y). There will be notions of an “upper bound” and for a “least uppe r bound” for meaningful symbols which are deﬁned in correspondence w ith the analogous 39notions above. A unique least upper bound of x and y will be den oted by (x ∨y), where ∨is taken to be a reserved symbol. Both of ∧and∨act as a means of combining, according to meta-labeling, several individual symbols into one unit. Because, for exam ple, (a ∧b) is consid- ered as a unit, it makes perfect sense to consider a compound s uch as (a ∧b)∧c. Such a compound, combining several individual symbols, wil l be called an “ex- pression”. Expressions will be primary constituents of the written symbolic system. The above considerations have introduced ∧and∨and found their signiﬁ- cance as a means of the formal combination of individual symb ols into expres- sions. It has also been shown how the meta-labeling involved in perception may be explicitly indicated by using the reserved symbol ≤. These are fundamen- tal steps in the development of the formal system, but there r emain further developments to consider. 4.4 A Preliminary Consideration of the Formal System Prior discussion has indicated that the general symbolic sy stem to be developed here cannot admit of the notion of truth nor proceed on an axio matic basis: Its most concrete realizations of relationships can only be expressions of contin- gency. While no axioms or truths may be embraced, it would com e to the same thing if any were explicitly rejected either. Thus this syst em must be formally compatible with the structure ofanyaxiomatic system. This observation justi- ﬁes summarily citing and applying the results of a particula r axiomatic theory in so far as the general symbolic system cannot have formal ru les for the ma- nipulation of symbols which are incompatible with it. This s tate of aﬀairs will be taken advantage of in what follows. A symbolic system with an associated partial order ≤and the operations ∧ and∨may be viewed on the basis of the usual Set theory, and then it c omprises what is commonly known as a LATTICE [28]. If attention is rest ricted to only meaningful symbols then the standard developments of L attice Theory will provide necessary speciﬁcations of the symbolic system. Fo r such a structure it can be shown1that the following results, which, for convenience, are cit ed as they appear in the above reference, must hold: L2. x∧y=y∧x and x ∨y=y∨x. (COMMUTATIVITY) L3. x∧(y∧z)=(x ∧y)∧z and x ∨(y∨z)=(x ∨y)∨z. (ASSOCIATIVITY) CONSISTENCY: x ≤y is equivalent to imposing either of x ∧y=x and x ∨y=y. THEOREM 8: Any system with two binary operations which satis ﬁes L2, L3, and CONSISTENCY is a Lattice, and conversely. Thus L2, L3, and CONSISTENCY completely characterize Latti ces. It must be the case, then, that at least one of these conditions must b e violated in order that a symbolic system not comprise a Lattice. 1For the Lattice-Theoretical results cited in this section s ee pp.1-17 of reference [28]. 40Further results for Lattices: Lemma 3: If y ≤z then (x ∧y)≤(x∧z) and (x ∨y)≤(x∨z). Lemma 4: (x ∧y)∨(x∧z)≤x∧(y∨z). Suppose that O is such that, for every meaningful symbol x, O ≤x holds, and that O′is deﬁned identically. It follows that O ≤O′≤O, so that O=O′. Thus any such symbol O, and likewise any symbol I such that x ≤I for any meaningful x, must be unique. Such O and I will be universal bounds for meani ngful symbols. O and I have been introduced, in part, in order to show that the ≤in Lemma 4 cannot be strengthened to an equality. This can be sho wn by con- sidering the system of inequalities O ≤x, O≤y, O≤z, x≤I, y≤I, and z ≤I. Then x∧(y∨z)=x∧I=x and (x ∧y)∨(x∧z)=O∨O=I, where it’s not the case that x=I. The equality in Lemma 4 may hold in some Lattices, however. Su ch Lattices will be called “DISTRIBUTIVE”. THEOREM 10: In a distributive lattice, if c ∧x=c∧y and c ∨x=c∨y, then x=y. Theorem 10 provides something like a cancellation law for di stributive lat- tices. Consider a distributive lattice with O and I. From the given l attice a new distributive one may be constructed which extends the origi nal lattice by includ- ing, for each x in the original lattice, a corresponding new s ymbol x′. This new symbol is to be deﬁned solely by the requirement that O ≤x≤I and O ≤x′≤I. In such a lattice it will be the case that x ∧x′=O and x ∨x′=I. Such an x′will be called the “complement” of x. According to Theorem 10, a symb ol x can have at most one complement in a distributive lattice. A lattice in w hich each symbol has a complement will be called a “complemented” lattice. A c omplemented distributive lattice will be said to be “BOOLEAN”. These considerations have been preparation for THEOREM 16: In a Boolean Lattice: L9. (x′)′=x, and L10. (x ∧y)′=x′∨y′. A ﬁnal lattice theoretical result will be of central importa nce here: THEOREM 7: Any chain is a distributive lattice. The above survey of Lattice Theory describes a formal struct ure which may be generated according to an individuals metalabeling, so t he general symbolic system must therefor be able to somehow embody such a structu re. It must be stressed, however, that the general symbolic system has notbeen shown to be a lattice. The reason for this distinction will be given in th e next section. 4.5 The Necessity of Generalizing Lattices With the last result cited in the last section it is appropria te to ask whether or not lattices, generated according to the order ≤and the operations ∧and ∨, are suitable structures for the general symbolic system. I t is to be expected that they are not, for, in addition to being based upon metala beling structure, lattices stipulate that such metalabeling structures must have least upper and 41greatest lower bounds while such requirements cannot be par t of a non-axiomatic theory. The selection of meaningful symbols, and of the meta-labeli ng between them, is almost entirely unrestricted and left up to the individua l. From this it follows that any formal rules for symbols which may be adopted for the symbolic system must apply whatever the meaningfulness or order relations o f the symbols may be. Now it is possible for any three particular symbols to for m, according to individual perception, a chain, so that any acceptable form al rule must apply as if the whole symbolic system is a lattice and, in fact, a chain . Theorem 7 then indicates that such a lattice must be distributive. The lattice structure is the minimal embodiment, as demonst rated by The- orem 8, of the partial order ≤and the associated operations ∧and∨which are generated by unrestricted meta-labeling with least upp er and greatest lower bounds. Because, as has been shown, free meta-labeling is pr ecisely what may and must be conveyed by language, it is unacceptable to have a further restric- tion placed upon such a lattice structure. Thus the general s ymbolic system must be able to accommodate lattices in general, and non-dis tributive lattices in particular. It may be noted, in passing, that the necessit y of not restricting the general symbolic system to Boolean lattices decisively distinguishes it from the mathematical methods acceptable to the Intuitionists. The above considerations lead to the conclusion that the gen eral symbolic system must be distinct from, and yet embody, lattices forme d by meaningful symbols. This may only be accomplished by embedding such lat tices in a dis- tinct formal system. It will then be necessary that this form al system itself have operations which are analogues of the operations ∧and∨, and that these analogous operations satisfy a distributive law. In order to justify the program pursued in this thesis it is ne cessary that the formal system may consistently reﬂect the “intuited” combi nations of meaning- ful symbols perceived by individuals and yet also obey forma l rules which apply generally. Thus, for any manipulations in the formal system , it will still be necessary to be able to identify corresponding meaningful e xpressions and, in this way, be able to assert that the system has yielded its own interpretation. Now there will generally be more than one expression in the fo rmal system cor- responding to a given meaningful one, for since a lattice of m eaningful symbols may be embedded within the formal system, it would otherwise be formally ide n- tical to such a lattice. It necessarily follows that the gene ral symbolic system has a “formal redundancy”: The process of “interpretation” whereby meaning- ful expressions are extracted from expressions in the forma l system is generally a many-to-one transcription. In conclusion, the only apparent shortcoming of the choice o f the lattice structure as the general symbolic system lies in its inabili ty to maintain both the freedom necessary in meta-labeling and obedience to gen erally applicable formal rules. Nevertheless, because the general symbolic s ystem must embed the lattice structure, a unique and deﬁnite means of specify ing the structure of the formal symbolic system has been indicated. This consist s in generalizing the formal rules for a distributive lattice while explicitl y retaining those lattice- 42theoretical results which don’t depend on which symbols are meaningful and therefor fall into the order ≤. Other results may not be taken over so directly, but may still suggest extensions. The task of this generaliz ation will be taken up in the next section. 4.6 The Symbolic System as a Division Ring The general symbolic system will be constructed in a very nea rly direct analogy with the structure of lattices found above, though it must be stressed that what is pursued here is merely the speciﬁcation of formal rules fo r symbolic manipu- lation which are not inconsistent with and yet are suﬃcient f or the embodiment of the lattice structures discussed above. In particular, t he general symbolic system will necessarily begin with two reserved symbols, re ferred to as opera- tions, denoted by +, called “addition” and corresponding to ∨, and ∗, called “multiplication” and corresponding to ∧. The symbols ∧and∨will still be retained in expressions whenever all non-reserved symbols are those that would result from the interpretation of an expression in the gener al symbolic system, and their appearance will indicate this state of aﬀairs. In the following, certain formal operations will be deﬁned i n terms of allowed substitutions. Recall that the “equality” of symbols, indi cated by =, justiﬁed the principle of substitution. The formal symbol = will, cor respondingly, be taken to be an extension of the equality previously deﬁned by metalabeling. Thus = will always justify substitution. Another note: The p resentation will parallel that of a typical axiomatization of a mathematical structure, but it is important to remember that no notion of “existence” is to be i nferred. This point will soon be stressed with an observation relating to a n inverse operation for∗. Recall that x ∧y was considered to be a symbol which corresponded in a particular way to the symbols x and y. + and ∗will be deﬁned to have the same formal property, so that the “combinations” that + and ∗yield may be represented by a new symbol. Given the combination of symbols a and b indicated by a ∗b, this same com- bination may be written as a new symbol c, where c = a∗b. (4.4) Given the combination of symbols a and b indicated by a + b, thi s same com- bination may be written as a new symbol c, where a+b=c. (4.5) The requirements (4.4) and (4.5) indicate that the operatio ns + and ∗are, in the usual terminology, “closed”. The associative property, speciﬁed above in L3, applies in a ll lattices and must therefor be taken over directly. Thus the following sub stitutions are per- mitted: 43(a∗b)∗c=a∗(b∗c) (4.6) (a+b) +c=a+ (b+c) (4.7) The distributive property will, as indicated in the last sec tion, have to be imposed. Thus the substitutions: a∗(b+c) = (a∗b) + (a∗c) (4.8) (a+b)∗c= (a∗c) + (b∗c) (4.9) It is necessary to give the second rule, rule (4.9), because a ∗b=b∗a need not hold in general. It will be convenient, for the sake of referring to some ideas in the usual mathematics, to revert to language using the notion of exist ence for a moment, this being done solely for the sake of motivation of a formal s ubstitution rule. In this spirit the cancellation property for distributive lat tices, which was cited in Theorem 10, leads, as a trial generalization, to the investi gation of the following standard group-theoretic rules: For any symbols a and b there are symbols x and y such that a∗x=b and y ∗a=b. (4.10) For any symbols a and b there are symbols x and y such that a+x=b and y+a=b. (4.11) It is easily shown that rules (4.4),(4.6), and (4.10) lead to the availability of a unique symbol “1”2, the “multiplicative identity”, such that For every symbol a, a ∗1=1∗a=a. (4.12) In a similar fashion, rules (4.5),(4.7), and (4.11) lead to a unique symbol “0”, the “additive identity”, such that For every symbol a, a+0=0+a=a. (4.13) It can, furthermore, be shown that 0 ∗a=a∗0=0 for any symbol a. With this in mind it is clear that rule (4.10) cannot be maintained. Returning now to the consideration of substitution rules, i t is clear that the symbols “0” and “1” may be reserved, and the rules (4.10) and ( 4.11) are to be replaced by the following rules: For any symbol symbol a which is not such that a=0, another sym bol, a−1, may be written such that a∗a−1=a−1∗a=1. (4.14) For any symbol a another symbol, -a, may be written such that a+(-a)=(-a)+a=0. (4.15) 2See pg. 201 of [29]. 44The expression a+(-b) is conveniently written as a-b. It is e asily shown that (-1)∗a= -a. a−1will be referred to as the “multiplicative inverse” of a, whi le -a will be called the “additive inverse” of a or the “negative” o f a. Evidently, the inversion of either multiplication or addition serves to er ase symbols in written expressions. The operation of inversion gives a good opport unity to emphasize that the concept of existence is not to be applied. If, in fact , a were to refer to, for example, a “dog”, then what, if anything, might a−1refer to ? The inverse of a dog ? Finally, it can be shown3that a certain substitution rule for addition holds: a+b=b+a. (4.16) This property of addition is referred to by saying that addit ion is “commu- tative”. It turns out that multiplication is not necessaril y commutative4. The rules (4.4), (4.5), (4.6), (4.7), (4.8), (4.9), (4.12), (4.13), (4.14), (4.15), and (4.16), taken together, indicate that the general symbo lic system comprises what is generally known as a “division ring” or a “skew ﬁeld”. It should be recalled that these rules merely specify the way in which sym bols are to be formally manipulated, so that, for example, the “existence ” of an inverse of a symbol is strictly equivalent to erasure of that particular symbol being allowed. In this sense algebra is here regarded to be a branch of orthog raphy. This is the extent of the exploration of the formal algebraic properties of the symbolic system that will be undertaken at this point. It rem ains to investigate the role of the order ≤in the symbolic system, and this task will be taken up in the next section. 4.7 Order in the Symbolic System The order in a lattice is generated and deﬁned by the meta-lab eling inter- relationships between meaningful symbols, and its sole pur pose is the conveyance of this information. The general symbolic system is to be a pr oper extension of a lattice in which not all symbols may correspond to meanin gful ones. Since not all symbols, even after interpretation, may be meaningf ul, it follows that no order can be deﬁned, according to meta-labeling, on all of th e symbolic system. This has the obvious consequence that Induction, and with it Proof Theory, cannot, in any sense, be carried out in the general symbolic s ystem. It also forecloses any paradoxes associated with the Axiom of Choic e. It will be the case, however, that part of the symbolic system will have an o rder deﬁned on it: This will be a partial order such as is induced under the em bedding of a lattice of meaningful symbols. There is a deﬁnite necessity , then, for extending the notion of order to the formal symbolic system. Those symbols which correspond to meaningful symbols will s till obey the laws found before for partial orders: 3See pg. 201 of reference [29]. 4See pp. 92-94 of [29]. 45x≤x for every x. (4.17) x≤y and y ≤z implies that x ≤z. (4.18) x≤y and y ≤x implies that x = y. (4.19) The uncritical transcription of Lemma 3 would read: If y≤z then x ∗y≤x∗z and x+y ≤x+z for any x. (4.20) Can this rule be accepted as it is? Consider a symbol y ≤0. From the second half of (4.20) it follows that 0 ≤-y. Thus, for any meaningful symbol y, exactly one of y = 0, y <0, or -y<0 must hold. Now consider y <0 and x = -1 and apply the ﬁrst half of (4.20). Then the conclusion would be re ached that both y<0 and -y<0, but this deﬁnitely cannot be accepted. It is thus required that x be restricted in the ﬁrst half of (4. 20), so that the condition x >0 is adopted. This results in the adoption of the two rules If y<z and x>0 then x ∗y<x∗z. (4.21) If y<z then x+y <x+z for any x. (4.22) It can now be concluded that the symbolic system is a division ring on part of which an order ≤obeying the requirements (4.17) through (4.19), and (4.21) and (4.22), is deﬁned. The nature of the symbolic system is st ill very abstract, but a more concrete picture will start to emerge in the next se ction. 4.8 Finiteness and Some Concrete Examples Now that the the abstract algebraic and ordinal properties o f the general sym- bolic system have been somewhat developed, it is possible to exhibit some of the usual mathematical objects that should be expected to ﬁnd a p lace within the system. These considerations will start with the fundament al notions of ﬁnite- ness and inﬁniteness, and will then proceed to the construct ion of symbols that multiplicatively commute with all other symbols, as well as to the construction of symbols with tailor-made commutation properties. These developments will illustrate the non-trivial nature of the rules thus far adop ted. Consider a symbol s to which various other symbols are assign ed. Suppose that x is one such assign, so that x is a descendent of s but not o f any other descendent of s. Construct a new symbol s/x such that s/x has t he same assigns as s except it omits x. If there is not a one-to-one relabeling from the assigns of s to those of s/x, then s will be said to have “ﬁnitely many” ass igns. Otherwise, s will be said to have “inﬁnitely many” assigns. If a symbol s has ﬁnitely many assigns, then it will be possibl e to explicitly arrange them in a terminating list. Given such a list a corres ponding sum m = 1 + 1 + 1 + · · ·+ 1/bracehtipupleft /bracehtipdownright/bracehtipdownleft /bracehtipupright m terms(4.23) 46may be derived, where the summands 1 correspond to the distin ct assigns of s. s will then be said to have m assigns and 1 will have been added “m times”. Such m will themselves be said to be “ﬁnite”, and also to be “Natura l Numbers”. Natural numbers serve to “count” the assigns of a given ﬁnite symbol. Besides this elementary construction of the natural number s, other construc- tions starting from 1 and using ﬁnitely many applications of the operations +, -,∗, and ( ·)−1, but not requiring (0)−1, result, in the obvious way, in the gen- eration of the Integers and Rational numbers. Consider a natural number m and any other symbol q. Then m∗q = (1+1+1+ · · ·+1)∗q = (q+q+q+ · · ·+q) and q∗m = q ∗(1+1+1+ · · ·+1) = (q+q+q+ · · ·+q). so that m ∗q = q ∗m for any q. Thus the naturals commute with all symbols. So too will the integers and rationals. Consider now those symbols which are generated by ﬁnitely ma ny operations +, -,∗, and ( ·)−1and ﬁnitely many other symbols x 1, x2,· · ·,xm. The resulting symbols will be rational polynomials in x 1, x2,· · ·,xm. If, as the x 1, x2,· · ·,xmare varied, the same sequence of operations is applied to the new xi, then a function will have been established. Thus all of elementary algebrai c mathematics is available in the symbolic system. Besides the development of this algebra, it is also of basic i mportance to investigate the constructive aspects of the commutativity of the ∗operation. In this case it has already been constructively established by Hilbert5that the rules for a division ring with order allow for symbols with tailor- made commutation properties, so that this detail need not be further addresse d. In this section some ﬁnite constructions within the symboli c system have been investigated. It has been found that the usual algebrai c objects of elemen- tary mathematics are to be found in the symbolic system. The i ntegers and rationals, in particular, provide such examples of symbols which, in addition, commute with every other symbol. It has also been found that n on-commuting symbols may, as is necessarily the case, be formally constru cted. These con- siderations have focused on ﬁnite manipulations of symbols , but it remains to investigate inﬁnite manipulations. This will be done in the next chapter. 5See pp. 92-94 of reference [29]. 47Chapter 5 THE CALCULUS GENERALIZED 5.1 Introduction The usual presentation of mathematics is developed in terms of ﬁnite quantities: Functions and numbers are, for the most part, ﬁnite. The Calc ulus is developed in terms of the concept of a limit which, again, relies on ﬁnit e quantities. It will be important for the sake of later considerations that t his prejudice not be maintained. Then, whenever quantities turn out to be, or a re assumed to be, ﬁnite, this state of aﬀairs can be explicitly recognized rather than tacitly assumed. In the sections to follow a general theory of functions, diﬀe rentiation, and integration will be developed within the general symbolic s ystem which doesn’t presume that the quantities involved are necessarily ﬁnite : The formal methods developed can be applied independently of this condition an d yet extend the results given by the standard ﬁnite version of the Calculus. 5.2 Functions Polynomials, as has been seen, give an example of functions, in the usual sense, in the general symbolic system. It will be necessary to give, however, a general characterization of functions in the general symbolic syst em which doesn’t rely on their having been ﬁnitely generated. The necessity of mai ntaining the formal structure of statements under relabeling will show that a pa rticular modiﬁed notion of a function is required. Suppose A = a 1∗a2∗a3∗ · · · ∗ an≡/producttextn j=1aj. If the a jare allowed to vary, that is, a relabeling is applied where each a iis replaced by a new “argument”, then this product will give a simple example of a function of m any variables. Whatever general deﬁnition of a function is adopted, it shou ld recognize this 48product as giving a function. Let the a jvary through, in particular, a relabeling a j/ma√sto→qj. The resulting product must be formally identical to the original and have t he same interpre- tation. Thus each a jmust vary in the same way, as given by q k=w(a k), where w is some well-deﬁned rule for relabeling individual variab les. It must then be the case that w(A) = w(/producttextn k=1ak) =/producttextn k=1w(ak) =/producttextn k=1qk. As a special case this gives w(x2) = w(x)2; This will determine w. Choose any v /ne}ationslash=0. Then an equation may be written involving a symbol u, u not corresponding solely to x, such that w(x) ∗v = u ∗x. Now w(x2) = u∗x2∗v−1 = w(x)2= u∗x∗v−1∗u∗x∗v−1, so that u = v. Thus relabelings w uare given, in general by w u(x) = u ∗x∗u−1for u/ne}ationslash=0. In order that these relabelings may be non-trivial it is only necessary that u not commute with all o f the arguments of the function to be deﬁned. This indicates the important role to be played by the availability of symbols which don’t commute with given s ymbols, for if no such symbols are available then even a simple product would b e incompatible with relabeling, let alone a natural deﬁnition of a function motivated by it. It will be noticed, in the case of the product A =/producttextn j=1aj, that any symbol which commutes with all of the a jalso commutes with A. This will serve as a deﬁning characteristic of a function. The considerations to follow in the development of the theor y of functions and diﬀerentiation, while proceeding from diﬀerent motiva tion, nevertheless for- mally parallel those already given by Dirac1in a paper addressing algebra in quantum theory. In particular, Dirac formalized operati ons already found in Quantum Theory and suggested formal axioms in order to car ry out these desired operations. He also worked within the framework of s tandard math- ematics with ﬁnite quantities and accepted the notion of mat hematical truth. His proposals for the deﬁnition of functions and diﬀerentia tion were made for application to the Quantum Theory in particular, but were no t proposed as replacements for the corresponding notions in mathematics itself. Here the de- velopments proceed from a non-physical motivation and basi s, and mathemat- ical quantities are not necessarily ﬁnite. With this diﬀere nce between Dirac’s approach and the approach of this thesis in mind, the results for these subjects to be given below will be merely cited, but not formally deriv ed here, unless they represent developments not formally parallel to Dirac ’s presentation. DEFINITION: Given certain symbols q αordered by their index α, a rule, calledφ, for generating values φ(qα) from the ”arguments” q α, will be called a FUNCTION iﬀ a) Anyβwhich commutes with all of the q αalso commutes with φ(qα), and b) Whenever q′ α= u∗qα∗u−1for any u /ne}ationslash=0, it follows that φ(q′ α) = u∗φ(qα)∗u−1. Some results for functions follow. 1. Functions are well-deﬁned, which means that any u, such as that above, will give the same value φ(qα). 2.φ(q′ α) commutes with whatever commutes with q′ α. 1See reference [30]. 493. Ifφandψare functions, then so are φ±ψandφ∗ψ. 4. V(x) ≡x−1is a function. 5. Composition of functions gives a function. 6. Functions of the same variables commute. Thus all arguments of a function commute. It is to be noted that polynomials are still, according to the new deﬁnition, functions. It will be noticed that a function whose arguments commute wi th all symbols will have a function value that is invariant under relabelin gs. Such a function will be called a “constant”. It is also the case that if the sym bol u which deﬁnes the relabeling commutes with an argument q αthen it will not change and the function will be constant in q α. If it is arranged that only one argument varies and yet the function value does not change, then the function is constant with respect to that variable. In fact, the function will not depe nd upon that variable, and so u will commute with all of the arguments that the functi on does depend upon, and then the function value won’t change under this rel abeling. 5.3 Diﬀerentiation In this section a generalization of the usual notion of diﬀer entiation will be given. The notion of diﬀerentiation given here will not depe nd upon the notion of a limit, but will still give the usual result for the diﬀere ntiation of sums and products of functions, and will therefor agree with the r esults of the usual diﬀerentiation on analytic functions. It will also turn out that, for the new notion of diﬀerentiation, every function is diﬀerentiable . Consider the function φ(qα). Then [q α, qβ]≡qα∗qβ-qβ∗qα≡0. If q βdoesn’t commute with everything, then another symbol p βmay be found such that [qα,pβ] =/braceleftbigg0 ifα/ne}ationslash=β 1 ifα=β Suppose Q= φ(qσ). Deﬁne∂αφ(qσ)= Q∗pα-pα∗Q. This is the “partial derivative of φwith respect to q α”. Note that if φis constant with respect to q αthen∂αφ=0. Other properties of diﬀerentiation will now be given: 1. All p′ αsatisfying [q α,p′ α]=1 give the same value for ∂αφ. 2.∂αφis also a function. 3.∂α(φ+ψ)=∂αφ+∂αψand∂α(φψ)=(∂αφ)∗ψ+φ∗(∂αψ). 4. The Chain Rule holds: ∂sφ(Qγ((s))=/summationtextn k=1∂kφ(Qγ(s))∂sQk(s). 505.∂α[∂βφ(Qγ)]≡∂αβφ(Qγ) is such that ∂αβ=∂βα. In other words, the order of partial diﬀerentiation doesn’t matter. Item number 3 indicates that ∂is a ”derivation”, and so diﬀerentiation, in the generalized sense, treats sums and products of function s in the same way as ordinary diﬀerentiation does. 5.4 Integration Diﬀerentiation begins with one function and returns anothe r. It may be asked whether or not this process is invertible, so that a converse process of determin- ing a function whose derivative is a given function can be per formed. It will be shown that this problem can be solved in general and, with the condition that only constants have derivatives equal to zero, for a functio n which is unique up to a constant. Then some results about integration will be sh own and some particular integrations, and functions arrived at through integration, will be deﬁned. These results will be useful in the further developm ent of the theory. Suppose Ψ is a function of the variable s and other variables q α. Suppose also that a function Φ is such that ∂sΦ(s,q α) = Ψ(s,q α). Then, for p deﬁned as above, ∂sΦ(s,q α)=Φ(s,q α)∗p-p∗Φ(s,q α)=Ψ(s,q α) (5.1) where s ∗p-p∗s=1 and q α∗p-p∗qα=0 for each q α, (5.2) while s ∗qα-qα∗s = q α∗qβ-qβ∗qα=0 also holds. (5.3) It can be seen that, for a symbol p deﬁned to satisfy the condit ions (5.2), and given Ψ(s,q α), the symbol Φ(s,q α) may be deﬁned to satisfy (5 .1). This may be done because all that is under consideration here is a symb olic method that needs to be consistent with algebra, but is not such that each symbol needs to have an algebraic derivation . There is thus always at least one such symbol Φ, so all functions Ψ have “antiderivatives”. Given such a Φ, consider now the function Φ+c, where c is a cons tant with respect to s. Then ∂s(Φ+c)=∂sΦ=Ψ. Thus antiderivatives can, at best, be deﬁned up to a constant in this way. This is as close as antider ivatives can be to being unique. It will thus now be assumed that only constan ts have zero derivatives. Under these conditions, if both Φ 1and Φ 2are such that ∂sΦ1=∂sΦ2=Ψ then ∂s(Φ1-Φ2)=0, so that Φ 1=Φ2+c, for some constant c. Then Φ 2(b,qα)-Φ2(a,qα) = Φ1(b,qα)-Φ1(a,qα) for such Φ 1and Φ 2and particular a and b. It is then possible to uniquely deﬁne /integraltextb aΨ(τ,qα)dτ≡Φ(b,q α)-Φ(a,q α) for any Φ such that ∂sΦ(s,q α)=Ψ(s,q α). (5.4) This condition gives/integraltextb aΨ(τ,qα)dτas a well-deﬁned function of a, b, and qα, and also gives a relationship formally identical to the usu al Fundamental 51Theorem of Calculus. For this reason it is reasonable to call/integraltextb aΨ(τ,qα)dτthe “deﬁnite integral” of Ψ from a to b. With this general deﬁniti on it is easy to deduce the usual formal properties of integrals: 1.∂x/integraltextx aΨ(s,q α)ds =∂x[Φ(x,q α)-Φ(a,q α)] =∂xΦ(x,q α) = Ψ(x,q α). 2. Suppose φ(s)=˜φ(u(s)). Then ∂sφ=∂u˜φ∗∂su, so/integraltextβ α∂u˜φ∗∂su ds =/integraltextb a∂sφds when u(a)= αand u(b)=β. Thus the Chain Rule leads, as usual, to the rule for changing the variables of integration. 3./integraltextb aφdτ+/integraltextc bφdτ=/integraltextc aφdτ. Thus integrals may be considered, as usual, to be given by sums. It also follows that/integraltextb aφdτ= -/integraltexta bφdτ. 4./integraltextb a(α∗φ+β∗ψ)dτ=α∗/integraltextb aφdτ+β∗/integraltextb aψdτfor constant αandβ. 5.∂x(φ∗ψ) = (∂xφ)∗ψ+φ∗(∂xψ) so/integraltextb aφ∗(∂xψ)dx =/integraltextb a∂x(φ∗ψ)dx -/integraltextb a(∂xφ)∗ψdx =φ∗ψ\|b a-/integraltextb a(∂xφ)∗ψdx. This is the usual rule for integration by parts. The diﬀerentiation of polynomials follows the usual rules, so it follows that integration of polynomials will also follow the usual rules . It can thus be seen that the theory of integration given here gives a non-trivia l extension of the usual theory. The tools just developed will now be applied to yield general ized versions of the logarithm and exponential functions. As every function is integrable, the integral/integraltextb aτ−1dτmay be considered without regard to the behavior, ﬁnite or otherwise, of the in tegrand. Deﬁne now ln(x) ≡/integraltextx aτ−1dτ, with a as yet unspeciﬁed. Then ln(x ∗y) =/integraltextxy aτ−1dτ=/integraltextx aτ−1dτ+/integraltextxy xτ−1dτ= ln(x) +/integraltextxy xτ−1dτ. Let u(τ) = x−1∗τ. Then ln(x ∗y) = ln(x) +/integraltexty 1u−1du = ln(x) +/integraltexty aτ−1dτ -/integraltexta 1τ−1dτ= ln(x) + ln(y) -/integraltexta 1τ−1dτ. Now if a = 1 is chosen, then ln(x∗y) = ln(x) + ln(y). (5.5) This choice is made, so that, in general: ln(x) ≡/integraltextx 1τ−1dτ. (5.6) Now∂xln(x)\|x=y=1 y, so that ln(w) = ln(v) implies that w = v, and so ln is a one-to-one function and may be inverted. Let g be the inve rse of ln. Then, according to (5.5), g must satisfy g(x+y) = g(x) ∗g(y) with g(0)=1. (5.7) Now, for rational p, it follows that ln(xp) = p∗ln(x), so then xp= g(ln(xp)) = g(p ∗ln(x)). (5.8) 52This provides a general deﬁnition of xpregardless of whether or not p is rational. In fact, g deﬁnes irrational symbols, so that g deﬁ nitely extends the known range of the symbolic system. Such irrationals corres pond to inﬁnite sequences of integers in their decimal expansions, so that t he inclusion of irra- tionals in the symbolic system requires the admittance of th e results of limits and, in particular, requires the inclusion of inﬁnite symbo ls and of reals. If the symbol “e” is deﬁned by the requirement that it be such that ln(e) = 1, then ex=g(x∗ln(e)) = g(x). Thus g clearly generalizes the exponential fu nction. 5.5 The Relationship to the Usual Calculus An abstract theory of functions, diﬀerentiation, and integ ration has been given which relies on the constructibility of symbols with tailor -made commutation properties but does not rely on the use of limits nor assume th at the quanti- ties involved are ﬁnite. Moreover, diﬀerentiation obeys th e usual rules when operating upon sums and products of functions and so the gene ralized theory is an extension of the usual Calculus. In fact, as a basis for com parison between the usual and the generalized Calculus, it may be helpful to t hink of imple- menting the given rules for the generalized theory in a symbo lic math program. The computations performed would then be identical to those performed in a version of the program based upon the usual Calculus wheneve r exact results are required and recourse to numerical methods for approxim ating limits is not allowed. Conversely, if it is assumed that all quantities involved in computation are ﬁnite, then the generalized functions, diﬀerentiation, an d integration given here reduce to those of the usual Calculus. It is thus possible to a pply the formal methods of the Calculus in a domain where the ﬁniteness of qua ntities is not presumed and to also, then, investigate explicitly where an d how the ﬁniteness of quantities aﬀects the results. 53Chapter 6 COMPLETION OF THE SYMBOLIC SYSTEM 6.1 Functional Equations and Their Consequences With the development of the Calculus it is now possible to der ive some further results on the algebraic nature of the general symbolic syst em. This will be done by solving, by the methods of the calculus just developed, ce rtain functional equations which are constructed based on the relationship b etween the formal system and an embedded lattice of meaningful symbols that re sults from it upon interpretation. These considerations will indicate that ∗may, in fact, be taken as the extension of ∧to the general symbolic system, and that complex numbers must necessarily be included in the general symbolic system . Consider the meaningful symbols a, b, and c. In considering m eaningful symbols, it follows that there is a function φwhich maps these symbols into corresponding symbols in the symbolic system. Thus let φ(a) = x,φ(b) = y, andφ(c) = z. Now φmust be such that, for some function F, φ(a∧b) = F[φ(a),φ(b)] = F[x, y] (6.1) The associative property of ∧then immediately results in F[x, F[y, z]] = F[F[x, y], z] (6.2) This will be referred to as the ASSOCIATIVITY EQUATION. The Associativity equation is a functional equation for F, a nd the solution of functional equations is, in general, a diﬃcult problem1the solution of which generally requires special additional assumptions about t he function to be de- termined. In the general symbolic system, however, this equ ation can be solved in all generality without restrictive assumptions about F2. The solution process 1See [31] and [32]. 2In this connection also consult [47]. 54is intricate, however, and the details are left to the append ix. The solution is here simply given as F[x, y] = Φ−1[α∗Φ(x)∗Φ(y)] (6.3) whereαis a ﬁxed constant and the form of Φ is speciﬁed in the the appen dix. The form of the equation (6.3) indicates that the operation ∗may deﬁnitely be taken to correspond to the operation ∧. This is signiﬁcant because the operation ∗was merely motivated by the operation ∧without there being a deﬁnite connection between them assumed. Further results about the symbolic system may be derived by c onsidering the relationship between interpretation and operations be tween meaningful sym- bols. Consider, in particular, a Boolean Lattice of meaning ful symbols, where a complement a′is given for every meaningful symbol a. Recall that (a′)′= a. Now, for some function f, it must be that φ(a′) = f(φ(a)). (6.4) From this it follows that f satisﬁes f(f(x)) = x. (6.5) This is another functional equation; it shall be referred to as the CATEGORIC- ITY EQUATION. As was the case with the Associativity equation, the solutio n of the Cat- egoricity equation may be found in the appendix. The solutio n is given, in general, by f(x) = [ cr- xr]1 r (6.6) where c and r are arbitrary ﬁxed constants. So far, the consideration of ﬁnite constructions within the symbolic sys- tem has resulted in rationals and polynomials. The discussi on of the Calculus has even extended the symbolic system to irrational numbers and reals. The equation (6.6) must, however, be solvable for any and all con stants c, r. This necessarily results in the admission of further kinds of sym bols. Consider, in particular, r = 2, with c and x rationals such that x2>c2+ 1. Then, in order that f(x) may be solved for, it is necessary that (-1)1 2be a symbol in the gen- eral symbolic system. Thus the general symbolic system must include complex numbers. This is quite an ironic result in the sense that the i nterpretability of a Boolean Lattice has resulted in the necessity of the symbol ic system being complex, at least, whereas such complex quantities only ent ered physical theory with the advent of Quantum theory and are taken to reﬂect a non -Boolean logic. The considerations of this section have shown a deﬁnite conn ection between the algebraic operations and algebraic types of the symbols of the general sym- bolic system on the one hand, and the corresponding operatio ns in an embedded lattice of meaningful symbols on the other. With these resul ts it is possible to proceed, in the next section, to a complete algebraic speciﬁ cation of the general symbolic system. 556.2 Frobenius’s Theorem and the Completion of the System The speciﬁcation of the general symbolic system is almost co mplete. It only re- mains to consider some consequences of the way in which ﬁnite ly many symbols may be combined and encoded. This will have consequences for the algebraic form of the system. Consider the symbols that may be ﬁnitely generated by the alg ebraic oper- ations and ﬁnitely many variables and complex numbers. The r esult will be a polynomial p of ﬁnite order, over the complex numbers, and in the given vari- ables. Suppose attention is restricted to only the consider ation of ﬁnite symbols. In this context it is a standard result that any such given ﬁni te order polyno- mial corresponds to a deﬁnite list of its distinct zeros, and conversely that a polynomial may be constructed which has precisely a given li st of zeroes. Thus a correspondence may be given between ﬁnite selections of me aningful symbols and polynomials which represent them. It must certainly be p ossible to con- struct a restricted form of the formal system which is compri sed only of symbols which are generated in this way. The general symbolic system must then be an extension of this system. The restricted ﬁnite form of the symbolic system would there for have to be algebraic over the reals at least, and the general system mus t be an extension of this restricted system. In order that uniform rules as to t he algebraic form of the symbols in the general symbolic system may be adopted, it is necessary that the general system have the same algebraic form as the ﬁn ite restricted system. The general form of division rings of ﬁnite symbols a lgebraic over the reals has already been established in a theorem of Frobenius3. This theorem indicates that such a division ring must be isomorphic to one of the real ﬁeld, the complex numbers, or the real quaternions. In addition to the information given by Frobenius’s Theorem , it may also be concluded that neither the form of the reals nor complex nu mbers may be adopted for the general symbolic system because these are co mmutative ﬁelds, and the formal system must include non-commuting variables . The unequivocal conclusion is therefor that in the general symbolic system t he symbols must have the algebraic form of the real quaternions, and in fact be rea l quaternions in the case that they are to be ﬁnitely generated. This simple algeb raic result will later be shown to be of importance in accounting for the four-dimen sionality of space- time in the derivation of the general relativistic formalis m. This requirement will also distinguish the quantum theoretical derivation t o follow in that while the usual theory operates over the complex ﬁeld, there is no c lear justiﬁcation for or understanding of the signiﬁcance of this particular c hoice, whereas such understanding is supplied here. To sum up, it has been found that every symbol ωin the general symbolic 3See pp. 327-329 of reference [33]. 56system will have the form ω=ω0+ω1∗i +ω2∗j +ω3∗k, where (6.7) i2=j2=k2= -1, i ∗j=-j∗i=k, j ∗k=-k∗j=i, and k ∗i=-i∗k=j. (6.8) In general the ωkwill commute with one another, will satisfy the rules of a division ring, and will comprise the components of such four -tuples, but they will not generally be real numbers, for the ﬁniteness of the ωkis not presumed for the general symbolic system. It may also be observed that suchωwill not be generally suitable as arguments for functions, as deﬁned he re, for only restricted classes of such symbols will commute with one another. One ﬁnal note. Given the expression (6.7) for ωit is possible to deﬁne the CONJUGATE of ω, denoted by ¯ ω, as ¯ω=ω0-ω1∗i -ω2∗j -ω3∗k. (6.9) The introduction of the conjugate also allows the INNER PROD UCT, between two symbols a and b, to be deﬁned by (a, b) = a ∗¯b. (6.10) Then, in the usual way, the NORM may be deﬁned by \|\|a\|\|=/radicalbig (a, a). (6.11) 6.3 Conclusions on the Algebraic System The time has ﬁnally come to take stock of the net eﬀect of all th ese abstract considerations about the general symbolic system. The foll owing conclusions have been reached: 1. The general symbolic system is a division ring with the alg ebraic form of the real quaternions. 2. The formal system has a partial order deﬁned on part of it. 3. Symbols have conjugates and norms, and an inner product is deﬁned. 4. Symbols are not necessarily ﬁnite, and inﬁnite symbols mu st be included in the general symbolic system. 5. A generalized version of the Calculus has been deﬁned on th e symbolic system without reference to ﬁnite quantities. 6. The generalized Calculus gives an extension of the usual l imit-deﬁned notions, so that all functions are both diﬀerentiable and in tegrable. With these observations it will now be possible to proceed to the derivation of physical theories without the utilization of any experimen tal results whatsoever! 57Chapter 7 THE DERIVATION OF PHYSICAL THEORY 7.1 Introduction The considerations of the previous chapters have been preli minary to this chap- ter, for to substantiate a claim that physical theory can be d erived in a purely formal manner, without recourse to experiment, it is necess ary to ﬁrst develop a formal system on its own terms. Having done so, the task of co nstructing physical theory will be taken up in the following manner. It has already been argued that the very nature of experiment ation is such that it must be possible to state its results and carry out its predictions in terms of ﬁnitely many ﬁnite symbols. It is therefor of particular i nterest to investigate, as a preliminary special case, the restriction of the genera l symbolic system that results if it is ﬁrst assumed that the variables in the symbol ic system are all ﬁnite. It will then be argued that the associated ﬁnite relations co mprising physical laws will be expressible in a particular canonical form. The analysis of this form may be broken into two cases. First it will be shown what form of predictive theory results if it is assumed that the ﬁnite relations are to be determinate. This will yie ld a novel derivation and justiﬁcation for General Relativity Theory1which is inevitable, on these assumptions, and which is free from experimental or merely p lausible theoretical justiﬁcation. It will also follow that Relativity is the uni que form of ﬁnite deterministic theory. From Einstein’s Field Equation, ser ving as the basis of General Relativity Theory, the dependent notion of Turing C omputability will also arise. Finite laws that are statistical are discussed next. In orde r that these laws 1There are many presentations of Relativity. For an intuitiv e motivation and overview, see [34]. For a more rigorous introduction in the geometric s tyle, see [35]. For an exposition given in the language of forms, see [36]. A non-geometrical r oute is taken in [37]. Finally, a concise mathematical presentation may be found in [38]. 58give information that is independent of Einstein’s theory, it is necessary that the quantities they provide for prediction must not, at the v ery least, be deter- minable by Turing Machines. This will lead to a unique set of r equirements for statistical predictions, and consequently to a propensity theory of probability which is similar, in its foundations, to Von Mises’s Frequen cy Theory of Prob- ability2. This theory will apply to the cases of both continuous and di screte representation of data, and so is perfectly general. Combining these interpretive aspects of ﬁnite statistical theory with the previously determined form of ﬁnite relations will yield Qu antum Theory as the unique embodiment of ﬁnite statistical theory3. The strength of this approach is shown in that it dismisses the controversies that have ari sen in deciding the proper way to interpret the quantum formalism. Such discussion completely analyzes ﬁnitary theory but it i s found, in fact, that these two canonical ﬁnite physical theories apparentl y result in a mathe- matical dichotomy. This diﬃculty may be understood to stem f rom one of two sources and lead to correspondingly deﬁnite means of resolu tion. One solution is to maintain the restriction to ﬁnite mathematical theories and resign one’s self to forever deferring to experiment. Alternately, the assumpt ion of ﬁniteness could be dropped, and this, it will be argued, results in a unique no n-ﬁnitary formal- ism. Interestingly enough, these two solutions, while embo dying the contending philosophical approaches of pragmatic empiricism and of id ealistic metaphysics, are, in a deﬁnite sense, not at all distinct. 7.2 The Form of Finite Relations Now that the abstract algebraic properties of the general sy mbolic system have been speciﬁed it is possible to arrive at some concrete concl usions about the kinds of descriptions this system can provide. Starting fro m the formal assump- tion that all descriptive symbols are ﬁnite it will be found, to begin with, that such ﬁnite relations must be expressible in a particular can onical form. The necessity of this form will have implications for the constr uction of physical theory. Consider any function in the general symbolic system. Such a function, and indeed any term in any equation, will, in general, have a valu e and arguments of the form of quaternions. Thus any equations can be express ed as a system of four functions set equal to zero, each function having value s of the form of either real or complex numbers. For each such function, the corresp onding arguments must be commuting symbols. In the general case the constructibility of symbols which di dn’t commute with given arguments was of central importance in the deriva tion of the gen- eralized Calculus. In the ﬁnite case, however, it has been ob served that the operations of the usual Calculus, with their associated lim it dependence, may 2See references [39] and [40]. 3For an axiomatic presentation of the quantum formalism see [ 41]. Note especially the comment on pg. 75 in regard to the ﬁniteness of experimental d ata. 59be substituted and do not require that the arguments not comm ute with certain symbols. For this reason it is possible to take the arguments of all functions to be complex when it is assumed that all symbols are ﬁnite. It should be pointed out that expressions in the ﬁnite case th erefor, while yet in correspondence with expressions in terms of real quatern ions, do not directly express the non-commutative nature of the division ring of t he general symbolic system. With this understanding any ﬁnite relations will, i n fact, be expressed in terms of complex-valued functions of complex arguments. Consider any ﬁnite collection of distinct symbols each of wh ich has been put into correspondence with, and therefor represented by, a distinct complex number q α. It is a standard result of complex variable theory that it is then possible to construct an analytic function φ(z) which has zeroes at precisely the points z=q α. Now the condition φ(z)=0 is equivalent to the condition \|φ(z)\|=0, so that given a known collection of data represented by th e complex numbers q α, the same collection is represented by a certain analytic fu nction φ(z) and is recovered by solving the equation \|φ(z)\|=0. In this way it is seen that the analytic function φ(z) associates the zeroes q αand thus expresses a relation between them. It is thus the case that any quantity d epending on the collection of data q αwill, in fact, be a function of \|φ(z)\|. The general conclusion is reached that all statements and quantities upon which ﬁni te physical theory may be based are to be found in this form. The considerations above were made under the assumption tha t the data qαwere already given and then φ(z) was to be constructed to represent them. However, the converse procedure is completely justiﬁed, so that, starting with an analytic function selected according to some criterion, \|φ(z)\|will have to be the quantity upon which prediction depends and it will, in ge neral, automat- ically engender an associated collection of data. It may be n oted in passing that the consideration of analytic functions generally mig ht also be used to ex- tend the theory to the case of countably many data, as analyti c functions with that many zeroes may be constructed. In the same way as above, the formal criteria which select φ(z) also correspond to certain “phenomena” so that the usual intuitive process of looking for quantities to repres ent what is observed may be reversed. This observation helps in understanding ho w a completely formal theory might reproduce the physical theories which h ave been motivated by experiments and observation in the past, although the diﬃ culty remains of identifying such constructive and yet abstract criteria wh ichφ(z) is to satisfy. It has been found that all ﬁnite predictive quantities must b e expressible in a particular canonical form, and that this form also indicat es a way to formally bypass experiment. The next section will move beyond these a bstractions to explore an application of this idea and to indicate a particu lar success of this approach. 7.3 Determinism and Relativity 607.3.1 Introduction In the sections to follow it will ﬁrst be demonstrated that a p articular form of\|φ(z)\|, called the interval, must be derivable which gives inverti ble relations between pairs of symbols. Next it will be shown how the interv al may be put into a canonical form at a point by a change of coordinates, an d that this form has implications for the corresponding physical theory. In particular, relations between events may be expressed in terms of the relationship between locally preferred coordinate systems, each of which give the interv al the canonical form at a particular point, associated with each event. The seque nce of events de- termined by the theory will then be deﬁned by the allowable ev olution of the preferred coordinate systems associated with these events . In order to determine this evolution it is next shown how the evolution of the prefe rred coordinate sys- tem may be expressed, via the geodesic equation, in any syste m of coordinates. Examination of these equations will indicate the quantitie s in the geodesic equa- tion which will govern the evolution of the preferred coordi nate system, and then it will be shown that there is a unique way that the behavior of the preferred coordinate systems may be determined in a manner independen t of the coordi- nate system in which the deﬁnition is expressed. This will yi eld Einstein’s Field Equations. Finally, it will be shown that Einstein’s equati ons are, as they must be, equivalent to the formal requirement of the general symb olic system which started these considerations. 7.3.2 Derivation of the Interval In this section it will be demonstrated that a particular for m of \|φ(z)\|must be derivable which gives invertible relations between pair s of symbols. This will give a novel derivation and interpretation of General R elativity Theory without any further assumptions or recourse to experiment. This derivation will thus explain all relativistic phenomena and concepts, such as gravitation, the behavior of light signals and space-time, and the uniﬁcatio n of the concepts of mass, momentum, and energy, as the natural implications of a formal necessity found in the general symbolic system. In this section it will, in fact, be demonstrated that the nec essity of allowing one-to-one relabeling in the general symbolic system requi res that a particular form of ﬁnite relation, determined by \|φ(z)\|, must be derivable which gives invertible relations between pairs of symbols. Recall the formal process of relabeling in the general symbo lic system. In order to investigate a special restricted case ,require, in addition, that this pro- cedure be one-to-one: Then x /ma√sto→f(x) is such that a = b exactly when f(a) = f(b). Thus such one-to-one relabeling maintains the distinctnes s of symbols: They may be said to be “separated”, so that if a /ne}ationslash=b then f(a) /ne}ationslash=f(b). This is a deﬁnite symmetric relationship between symbols which is maintaine d under invertible relabeling. As such manipulations are an inherent part of th e general symbolic system, this precise relationship must ﬁnd its expression f or ﬁnite relations as well. 61Supposeφ(z)=m ∗eıθ, where m ≥0, is to express this relationship for pairs of symbols a and b. Deﬁnite values for a and b must then give deﬁni te values for φ(z). However, m= \|φ(z)\|, upon which expression of this relationship depends, does not generally identify a unique function φ(z):θis as yet undetermined. Such a speciﬁcation requires a conventional value ofθbe chosen, and the most convenient is θ=0. Then \|φ(z)\|=φ(z)= m ≥0. In other words, the realization of the relationship maintained by invertible relabeling re quires, for its ﬁnite ex- pression, utilizing an analytic φ-function which is real-valued and non-negative. The labels a and b referred to above are representatives of th e general sym- bolic system and, as such, are given by real quaternions in th e ﬁnite case. Each label can, therefor, be represented by 4-tuples of real numbers: xµ, where µ=0,...,3. Thusφ(z) may be rewritten as δ(xµ 1,xν 2). Let dxµ=xµ 2-xµ 1. Then, with some abuse of notation, δ(xµ 1,dxµ)≡δ(xµ 1,xµ 2) may be deﬁned. δ, being analytic, may be expanded in a Taylor series for xµ 1ﬁxed and dxµ=O(ǫ): δ(xµ 1, dxµ)=g(xµ 1)+gα(xµ 1)dxα+gαβ(xµ 1)dxαdxβ+gαβγ(xµ 1)dxαdxβdxγ+O(ǫ4). (7.1) Note here that Einstein’s convention, where repeated indic es are summed over, is utilized in (7.1). Also note that all g-functions ar e symmetric in their indices asδis analytic. Now it may be seen, at O(1), that: δ(xµ 1, xµ 2)-δ(xµ 2, xµ 1)= g(xµ 1)-g(xµ 2). (7.2) Butδis symmetric in its arguments, so that: g(xµ 1)=g(xµ 2). (7.3) Thus g is locally constant, and this result may be continued s o that g=0 may be stipulated globally. This amounts to choosing δ(xµ, xµ)=0 rather than some other ﬁxed number. Consider now δ(xµ 1, -dxµ). Asδ≥0, it follows that all odd-ordered terms must be zero, so that: δ(xµ 1, dxµ) = g αβ(xµ 1)dxαdxβ+O(ǫ4). (7.4) It may be recalled that δwas to fulﬁll the exact requirement of expressing the separateness of symbols and nothing more. Thus, because the second order term in (7.4) already suﬃces to make this distinction in gene ral, the higher order terms must be dropped. The form of the function δis thus uniquely given by δ(xµ 1, dxµ) = g αβ(xµ 1)dxαdxβ. (7.5) Becauseδ≥0 and is real, it follows that δmay be rewritten as δ=ds2, where ds≥0 is real-valued. The value ds corresponding to the labels xµ 1and xµ 2is called the “interval” between them. This allows (7.5) to be put in th e conventional form: ds2= gαβ(xµ 1)dxαdxβ. (7.6) This equation now deﬁnes, for given points xµ 1and xµ 2, the interval ds once the functions g αβmay be stipulated. It must be remembered that conditions 62specifying the g αβare required before this deﬁnition is complete. It should al so be noted that, if ds2is to express only the separateness of symbols, then the g αβ must be determined by a self-consistent equation with no oth er data required. Otherwise, the g αβwill reﬂect both the separateness of symbols and something else. 7.3.3 Changes of Coordinates and the Canonical Form Now, in this section, it will be shown how the interval just de rived may be, and must be able to be, put into a canonical form at each point b y a change of coordinates. The preferred coordinate system which is th us associated with each point then serves as a deﬁnite means of speaking of a rela tionship between points: The canonical form at a point will identify a locally preferred coordi- nate system, so that events may be characterized in a deﬁnite way and it thus becomes possible to speak of deﬁnite relations between them . This will lead, in short order, to a logical derivation of the usual relativist ic space-time picture of physical reality. The coordinates xµof labels, being subject to relabeling, cannot have a direct signiﬁcance. It is possible, however, to indicate at this po int how relabeling is eﬀected and how this aﬀects the terms of (7.6). Suppose xµ=xµ(¯xα) gives a relabeling, or change of coordinates. It is only required that this substitution leave ds2invariant in (7.6). Thus the change of coordinates need only be continuous, and substitution of dxµ=∂xµ ∂¯xαd¯xα. (7.7) into (7.6) leads to ¯ gµν=gαβ∂xα ∂¯xµ∂xβ ∂¯xν. (7.8) Now because ds2is a real quadratic form it is, according to a standard theorem4, always possible, at any point xµ, to change coordinates continuously so as to obtain the canonical form ds2=ηαβdξαdξβ=ηαα(dξα)2where \|ηαβ\|=δαβ. (7.9) It is clear that a uniform deﬁnition of ds cannot be arrived at unless the signs ofηααare determined in the same way for all points xµ. Now each xµ is to correspond to some event which an individual perceives at a particular instant, so that one of the variables xµmust be specially identiﬁed, by a sign forηααdistinct from that of the others, to serve as an indicator of t he instant in question. The arbitrary choice that x0be identiﬁed by η00= 1, and thus also thatηmm= -1 for m=1, 2, and 3, is made. Once the canonical form of ds2has been decided upon, the changes of coor- dinates that may lead to it at a particular point take on a deﬁn ite signiﬁcance. It is then possible to speak of deﬁnite relationships betwee n diﬀerent points 4See pg. 207 of [42]. 63based on the relationship between the preferred coordinate systems associated with these points. This has the consequence, ﬁrst of all, that the labels xµwill now be formally identical to the usual space-time which comprises a pseudo- Riemannian mani- fold. In such a scheme there is an associated notion that the r elation between events which ds speciﬁes is given by a sort of signaling. In th e standard empir- ical justiﬁcation of Relativity, this signaling is taken to be a property of light. Here, no such recourse to experiment is implied, but it is ins tead asserted that the formal properties of the symbolic system itself require that such a relation between events obtain, and that, if it is desired that this re lation be interpreted in in terms of signaling, there be “something” which travels between events and acts as such a signal. This something, being always associat ed with the events which it acts as a signal for, can be thought of as being made up of whatever causes the perception of these events. It follows that if the identiﬁcation of events is ultimately made visually, for example, then the si gnal between events must be realized by light. The necessity of a uniform deﬁnition of ds also has the conseq uence that instants fall, from a ﬁnitely justiﬁable point of view, into a linear order as does the real-valued variable x0, and thus introduces the qualitative temporal notions of “earlier” and “later” to the instants. It is to be n oticed that in this construction of the notion of time, the linear and continuou s aspects of time are not assumed, based on experience, but are instead derive d from the formal nature of the symbolic system as a whole. It must also be stressed that the three remaining non-tempor al labels xmare not presumed in order that the usual notion of space may ﬁnd a p lace within the formalism. Instead, this three-dimensional aspect of ﬁ nite description rather justiﬁes the notion of space, for the relations found in “spa tial perceptions” are never argued for on the basis of inﬁnitely many examples. Bec ause the notion of space may be derived simply from the assumption of a ﬁnite c heck of its relations, and always includes this assumption, it would be superﬂuous to assert any further source of the formal nature of spatial perceptio ns. Both space and time may thus be seen to be moulds into which experiences are p oured when construed ﬁnitely. Once the functions g αβare determined the diﬀerential relation (7.6) for ds2 may, in most cases, be integrated along a path for which ds ≥0. Paths which give the least value may then uniquely deﬁne the interval between distant events. It will then be possible, by a chain of intermediate transforma tions, to relate such events by changes of variables. This process will not, however, necessarily relate all pairs of points xµ. It may happen that the extension of a path along which ds ≥0 is blocked by the unsolvability of this condition. This will be the case where attempting to cross regions in which ds ≥0 cannot be satisﬁed or in which ds simply vanishes. Such pairs of events will then not be ﬁnitely related in this direc t way, and Relativity is, in this sense, a “local” theory. Such events cannot “comm unicate” by (light) signaling, but the pairs of points xµwill still be formal parts of the descriptive apparatus of the theory and serve to mathematically complet e the manifold. A 64new notion, that of relatively isolated parts of “reality”, even parts which are never experienced, is thus introduced. Another interesting remark may be made at this point. The fun ctions speci- fying changes of coordinates have thus far been interpreted “passively” as giving a mere renaming of the same events. It is unavoidable, howeve r, that these func- tions will also relate pairs of events identiﬁed by the argum ents and the values of these transformations. Because these events may both fal l within a par- ticular individual’s experiences, the change of coordinat es may be interpreted “actively” as referring to transitions between that indivi dual’s experiences. The change of coordinates may thus show, at a particular instant , how that indi- vidual’s experiences are related, or, if the transformatio n is between distinct instants for the individual, how “earlier” events are relat ed to “later” ones. If these events are considered to be experienced by distinct individuals, then the change of coordinates speciﬁes a “change of reference fr ame.” Once the inter- val is determined for all events, it follows that it will inte r-relate the experiences of all distinct observers. The equal admissibility of all co ntinuous changes of variables then gives all observers, which may be related in t his way by changes in reference frame, an equal observational status. 7.3.4 The Geodesic Equation The canonical form discussed in the last section identiﬁes a locally preferred coordinate system that is associated with each point in spac e-time. With these coordinate systems characterizing each point it now has bec ome possible, in principle at least, to speak in some deﬁnite way about the rel ationship between events. Progress on this count will be made in this section, w here the form of the equations describing the evolution of the locally preferre d coordinate systems will be determined. It will then be apparent which quantitie s in these equations must be determinative in any law for this evolution. It has been found that the ﬁnite-relatedness, generated by i nvertible rela- beling, of pairs of events may be expressed in terms of the rea l quadratic form ds2, and that ds2depends, in turn, on the functions g αβ. The ﬁrst step in the determination of the g αβwill now be undertaken. For ds>0 it follows from (7.9) that: 1 =ηαα/parenleftbiggdξα ds/parenrightbigg2 . (7.10) From this it follows that 0 =ηαα/parenleftbiggdξα ds/parenrightbigg /parenleftbiggd2ξα ds2/parenrightbigg . (7.11) In order that (7.11) hold generally it is necessary that d2ξα ds2= 0. (7.12) 65For any parameter ωand new coordinate system ξα=ξα(xµ) the equation (7.12) takes the form d2xλ dω2+ Γλ µνdxµ dωdxν dω=0 (7.13) where Γλ µν≡∂xλ ∂ξα∂2ξα ∂xµ∂xν. (7.14) (7.13) are usually known as the “geodesic equations”, while the Γλ µνare known as the “Christoﬀel” symbols of the ﬁrst kind. These equ ations indicate the form taken by the conditions (7.12) in any coordinate sys tem. Note that any diﬀerences between points xµmust be determined by Γλ µνat the points, but that it is always possible to choose a coordinate system so that Γλ µνvanishes at a given point. Thus the Γλ µνdetermine the relationship between points under relabelin g, but not in a manner independent of the associated change in co ordinates. 7.3.5 The Metric Field Equation It will now be shown how the metric ﬁeld g αβmust be determined in a manner independent of the coordinates. With the determination of g αβthe interval will also be deﬁned. Because both g αβand Γλ µνdetermine ds, it must be the case that they are related to each other. In fact, it may be shown that they satis fy the relations ∂gµν ∂xλ= Γρ λµgρν+ Γρ λνgρµ, and (7.15) Γσ λµ=1 2gνσ/bracketleftbigg∂gµν ∂xλ+∂gλν ∂xµ-∂gµλ ∂xν/bracketrightbigg (7.16) where gνσgρν=δσ ρis the delta function. (7.17) Note that gνσmay be deﬁned because the coordinate transformations con- sidered are invertible. Because all Γρ λνmay be made to vanish at a point, it follows from (7.15) that the same may be done for all∂gµν ∂xλ. Then the equations (7.15) and (7.16) give no further information. A non-vanish ing relationship may, however, be derived. This relationship will be expressed in a coordinate system in which Γσ λµvanishes, and may be derived by diﬀerentiating (7.16) with r espect to xβ. Then ∂Γσ λµ ∂xβ=1 2gνσ/bracketleftBigg ∂2gµν ∂xβ∂xλ+∂2gλν ∂xβ∂xµ-∂2gµλ ∂xβ∂xν/bracketrightBigg . (7.18) It should be noted that this relationship is linear in the sec ond derivatives of g µνwith coeﬃcients depending upon g µν. Such a diﬀerential equation is amenable to integration by parts, so that an equivalent cond ition may be derived from a variational principle. This will have the advantage o f guaranteeing that 66the equation thus derived will determine g µνin a way that is independent of the coordinate system chosen. It is, in fact, necessary that suc h an equation may be found if invertible relabeling is to be realized in the ﬁni te system. Consider the variational principle I =/integraldisplay R√−gd4x, whereδI = 0. (7.19) Here g is the Jacobian of the transformation from the locally canonical co- ordinate system, which is given by the determinant of g αβ, and R is a scalar function of g αβand its ﬁrst and second derivatives. Now equation (7.18) is a relation in symbols with four indice s, so it will be advantageous to think of R as R = gµνRµν= gµνRλ µλν. (7.20) If R is to be a scalar, then Rλ µωνmust be a tensor, and if δI = 0 is to yield a relation of the form of equation(7.18), then this ten sor must be linear in the second derivatives of g αβ. Adventitiously, it’s the case that there is, up to constant multiples, exactly one tensor with these properti es5. It is the Riemann- Christoﬀel Curvature Tensor. Then R must be the Riemann Curv ature Scalar. Applying this information to (7.19) yields Rµν-1 2gµνR = 0. (7.21) This is Einstein’s Field Equation (in free space). It is, acc ording to the previ- ous analysis, the unique equation deﬁning a self-determine d gαβﬁeld which may merely express a ﬁnite local relation within the general sym bolic system, this relation being determined solely by the requirement that re labeling be carried out in a one-to-one fashion. 7.3.6 The Signiﬁcance of the Field Equation The equation (7.21) must be satisﬁed by the metric in order to result in a self-consistent ﬁnite theory which embodies simply the not ion of relabeling. It should be possible, according to the reversible way in which the theory has been constructed, to make the equation (7.21) the sole basis of th e entire theory. This is, as will be indicated, in fact possible. This approach may also be extended to provide the basis of all theories which are merely consisten t with relabeling. The theory presented so far relating to the interpretation o f equation (7.21) is somewhat unsatisfactory in that a manifold on which (7.21 ) may be solved anywhere does not in any way indicate any ﬁnite number of poin ts which may be distinguished from the others. There has to be some way in whi ch a particular ﬁnite collection of points may be singled out so that equatio n (7.21) describes their behavior. The very construction of these equations in dicates that such a 5Proof of this assertion may be found on pp. 131-134 of [37]. 67distinction must be provided by a topological invariant. Th e curvature, in itself, is not eligible to make such a ﬁnitely deﬁned distinction, so the only possibility is that points may be distinguished by there being singulari ties in the metric. This representation of the interaction of a ﬁnite number of d istinguished points was achieved by Einstein and Infeld6. Their conclusions were that the equations (7.21) were, in themselves, suﬃcient to complete ly determine the behavior of the singularities representing distinguished points. Moreover, it was found that the condition that the singularities of the metri c ﬁeld be restricted to the distinguished points resulted in these points moving according to the geodesic equation. Thus the Field Equation implies, in this sense, the geodesic equation and consequently that the intervals between point s be invariant under one-to-one relabeling. The preceding analysis also indicates how to determine all ﬁ nite relations which are consistent with relabeling, for such relations must be determined by solutions of an extension of equation (7.21). Extensions of equation (7.21) will have to be of the form Rµν-1 2gµνR = kTµν. (7.22) An identity of Bianchi7then indicates, as a consequence of (7.22), that Tµν:ν=0 , where“:” indicates covariant diﬀerentiation. (7.23) This is a conservation equation, and Tµνwill give what will be interpreted as an Energy-Momentum Tensor. In fact this interpretation of Tµνcan be justiﬁed fully. The phenomena characterized by (7.22) will, because of the maintenance of separation which the construction of (7.22) uniquely reﬂ ects, be localizable, and localizable phenomena may be described by correspondin g proper velocities vµ=dxµ ds. (7.24) Now a general second order tensor may be expressed as a sum of t erms which are the product of a scalar and two vectors. Thus, for a given s calar ﬁeldρ, Tµν=ρvµvν(7.25) gives the most general expression for a source contribution for (7.22). Applying (7.23) to this source results in vµ(ρvν):ν+ρvν(vµ):ν=0. (7.26) Multiplying (7.26) by v µyields vµvµ(ρvν):ν+ρvν(vµvµ:ν)=0. (7.27) Now g µνvµvν= 1 implies that 0 = (g µνvµvν):σ=2g µνvµvν:σ, and this yields vνvν:σ= 0. (7.28) 6See reference [43]. 7For this and other mathematical details in this section, see [38]. 68With this the last term of (7.27) drops out, leaving (ρvν):ν=0. (7.29) This is the equation of conservation of Energy-Momentum, so that imposing the ﬁeld equation has the automatic consequence of requirin g the conservation of energy-momentum. Returning attention to (7.26), it is seen that the ﬁrst term v anishes, so that, forρ/ne}ationslash=0, this leaves vνvµ:ν=0. (7.30) Consider the geodesic equation when vµ=vµ(xα(s)), so that multiple paths may be explored. It may be conﬁrmed that in this case the geode sic equation is given by (7.30). Thus imposing the ﬁeld equation also requir es that phenomena follow the geodesic equation. Thus, in both the free space case, given by (7.21), and in the p resence of “matter”, as is the case for (7.22), the Field Equation is, in itself, a complete basis for the entire Relativity Theory. This is of particula r importance in that it ﬁnally justiﬁes, in a restricted case, the faith that a pur ely formal symbolic theory of experience would not necessarily degenerate to me re tautologies, but rather could lead to a constructive theory which accounts fo r some of the struc- ture in the diversity of experience. Relativity does, after all, describe gravitation and therefor leads to an agglomeration and organization of t he various labels which correspond to “matter”. This leads to the conclusion t hat, for a given ﬁnite level of description which is inter-related in a one-t o-one manner, the gen- eral symbolic system has thus far succeeded in formally gene rating structure and the corresponding metalabeling. 7.4 On Turing Computability Einstein’s Field Equation leads, as demonstrated in the las t section, to the sat- isfaction of the geodesic equation for the description of tr aceable phenomena in space-time. An important limiting case for the solution of t he geodesic equa- tion is that of arbitrarily slow processes. In such cases the geodesic equation reduces8to the Newtonian form dvm dx0= (g001 2), mfor m = 1,2,3. (7.31) Here “,” indicates partial diﬀerentiation with respect to t he variable with the indicated index. The form of these equations indicates that the particle motions described are those of motion according to Newton’s laws in a conservative potential. Such potentials may describe, among other thing s, elastic collisions. Thus the notion of a system of particles that interact by elas tic collisions has a strictly theoretical derivation. 8See, again, reference [38]. 69From this intuitively appealing special case of phenomena t hat may be gen- erated from Einstein’s Field Equation, important conclusi ons follow. In fact, such elastic collisions deﬁne the ideal behavior of billiar d balls, and, as a purely conceptual matter, it has been demonstrated9that such a “physical system” may perform all of the computational steps necessary in orde r to realize a Turing Machine. Thus Relativity, as a special case, contains all of Recursive Function Theory. If Church’s Thesis, that all computations may be car ried out on a Tur- ing Machine, is accepted then this demonstrates that that Re lativity entails, in fact, all conceivable symbolic computations. Moreover, as all Turing Machines may be encoded as integers10, it would follow that any symbolic computation would be speciﬁed by a particular integer, and the eﬀects of R elativity, in re- stricted special cases, could be given by this same number. It should also be observed that both Set and Class Theory are g iven in the context of a formal logic. Thus all derivations of statement s in Set and Class Theory follow steps that may be directed by Turing Machines. It follows that the General Symbolic System cannot be any less powerful than either Set or Class Theory, as it, in fact, includes them. 7.5 Statistical Prediction and Probability Relativity Theory, its derivation, and some of its conseque nces have now been discussed. It has been found that Relativity Theory may be de rived on a strictly formal basis and includes, as a special case, all of Recursiv e Function theory and Set and Class Theory as well. Given the breadth of these re sults it may well be wondered whether or not there can be any other ﬁnite th eory which hasn’t already been encompassed in Relativity Theory. The i nvestigation of this possibility will be taken up next. Relativity Theory has been shown to be the canonical ﬁnitary formalism in the case when invertible operations are performed on indivi dual symbols. It will be recalled, however, that the general symbolic system , besides such indi- vidual symbols, also admits of metalabels or, in other termi nology, “categories” as fundamental concepts. If the general symbolic system wer e exhausted by Relativity, then this would amount to saying that no formal l aws may be stated in terms of categories. It is to be expected, and it will be sho wn in the following, therefor, that there are some ﬁnitary laws which take metala bels as such as their arguments. These relations will go beyond Relativity Theor y. Any ﬁnite relations which are to go beyond the predictions wh ich Relativity already provides must, at least, not be computable by Turing Machines. Thus the considerations to follow will begin by considering what role Turing Machines may play in the theory of ﬁnite relations. Consider a general function ρwhich is to represent a ﬁnite relation. As indicated in the last section, any Turing computable relati ons may be repre- sented by an integer m which encodes an appropriate Turing Ma chine. Thus 9See reference [44]. 10Kleene gave such a standard form. See [5]. 70the function ρmust have the dependence ρ=ρ(φ, m) (7.32) whereφis itself an undetermined function which gives a ﬁnite relat ion.φwill therefor be, in general, a complex analytic function. Such f unctions correspond, as has been noted, to at most countably many zeros, and so φcan give a relation between at most countably many data. The domain, and thus the range, ofφ also may thus, without loss in generality, be taken to be the N atural numbers. The distinct natural numbers making up the range of φwill be referred to as “attributes”. These attributes naturally classify the act ion ofφin the sense thatφ(n) =φ(m) indicates that n and m have the same attributes. It may thus be said that a ﬁnite relation ρcorresponds to a particular at most countable variety of integral attributes which ”occur” in s ome sequence, together with the speciﬁcation of a Turing Machine. The sequence itse lf corresponds to some ﬁnite relation which may be speciﬁed by an analytic func tionφ. Now, for a ﬁxed variety of attributes, any such function ρ(φ, m) may be recoded as ρ(φ, m) =ω(˜φm) where (7.33) ˜φm(n)≡φ(Tm(n)) (7.34) If there is to be such a thing as a ﬁnite relation ρwhich is independent of Relativity, and thus also of Turing Computability, then it m ust be the case that ρ(φ, m) =ρ(φ, s) for all naturals m,s . (7.35) Suchρwill be said to be “T-independent”. Some conclusions about T -independent functions will now be derived. Consider those Turing Machines T mwhich permute initial segments of the sequence corresponding to φ. Ifρis to be invariant under the action of all such Turing Machines then it must, ﬁrst of all, be invariant under the action of all Tmwhich permute the same initial segment of the sequence of att ributes ofφ. Then the dependence of ρon this initial segment must be expressible in terms of the relative frequencies of each attribute within this se gment. If this is to apply, for a general ﬁnite function ρ, for all initial segments, then, ﬁrst of all, the relative frequencies of each attribute must approach li mits.ρwill then have to be a function of these limiting relative frequencies. In p articular,ρmay be the limiting relative frequency of one of the attributes of φ. The limiting value, p(a), of the relative frequency of an attribute “a” for a T-in dependent function will be called its “probability”. Now suppose T myields an increasing function of n. Then, in general, ˜φm(n) =φ(Tm(n)) will have the eﬀect of generating a new sequence in which certain of the original sequence will have been omitted based solely on the place, in terms of n, they occupied. Such “place selections” must not, there for, alter the limiting relative frequency of an attribute if ρis to give a ﬁnite relationship independent of what Turing Machines may yield. Such sequences, being “in sensitive” to place selections, will be said to be “Random”. It is of partic ular signiﬁcance 71that ”random” sequences mustbe convergent as any particular segments of such sequences which might prevent convergence of the associate d relative frequencies may be removed by place selections. It should be pointed out that, for a given sequence to be rando m, it can in no sense be “known” term-wise, for the sequence is only to be a cknowledged in the role which the theory assigns to it, and the theory cons iders a random sequence and any other sequence derived from it by place sele ctions to be inter- changeable. With this observation it becomes clear that whi le the argument of a probabilistic function may be described as a random sequen ce, it may more simply be described as a proper category, where a proper category is a metala- bel which cannot be deﬁned in terms of its corresponding assigns. To be clear, the unknowability of the random sequence entails the imposs ibility of uniquely determining φ. From the above considerations it may be concluded that the qu antities which T-independent ﬁnite functions may give as description beyo nd those obtainable from Turing machines may be thought of as being limiting rela tive frequencies of sequences of attributes. Furthermore, the sequences of a ttributes which these limits apply to must be random, that is, they must be insensit ive to place selec- tion. These two properties correspond, in an obvious way, to the axiomatic basis for Von Mises’s frequency theory of probability, although t he theory presented here has a strictly conceptual basis and is not asserted to ha ve an empirical basis as is that of Von Mises. It should also be stressed that this th eory is distinct from the usual measure-theoretic formulation of probabili ty11or the classical theory of probability12. Recall that the question at issue here is the possibility of t here being a ﬁnite theory that is independent of Turing computability. With th is in mind it is clear that something must be said about the acceptability of inﬁni te sequences nec- essarily playing a role in the theory. In this connection it m ust be recalled that it is the limiting relative frequency itself, and the random ness of the sequence, which are demanded by the theory, and not any particular inﬁnite sequence of occurrences of attributes nor any calculations involvin g an inﬁnite quantity; The calculation of this limiting frequency, which depends s olely onρ, need not require any such limiting processes to be carried out. In fact, a ﬁnite T-independent theory treats probability as a “propensity”. This propensity, as deﬁned by ρand not requiring the elaboration of a sequence of attributes, operates somewhat like a force ﬁeld in classi cal physics: Just as a force causes a deﬁnite dynamical evolution, so a probabilit y causes an evolution of the relative frequency of an attribute towards a deﬁnite l imit. This action is unlike that of a classical force, however, in so far as the p ropensity governs the collective behavior of the whole sequence and may theref or be considered to act non-locally13. In this sense probability may be thought of as a non-local 11See [45]. 12For a comprehensive survey of distinct theories of probabil ity see [46]. [47] determines features which all theories of probability ought to share. 13Quantum theory may, in fact, be formulated as a strictly caus al though non-local theory as was done by deBroglie and Bohm. See [48]. 72relation. It is only after viewing probability in this ﬁnite ly-oriented way that a ﬁnite sequence of attributes may be explicitly introduced w hich is supposed to be governed by a law of probability. Then it may be argued, bas ed on this, that as the sequence is extended under the given probability cond itions its relative frequencies will approach particular limits. There can, in fact, be no cause to doubt that the sequence is random as the sequence is, after al l, an artifact of the probabilistic theory itself. One last remark on statistical theory in general. It will be n oticed that the above theory, being based on the notion of T-independence, t reats of discrete at- tributes. This is not, however, an essential restriction, f or this probability theory may be extended, in the usual way, to probabilities over cont inuous attributes. Randomness may still play a role in the continuous theory as c ontinuous dis- tributions may be approximated by discrete ones on which the above notions of Randomness make sense. The discussion to follow will ther efor retain the discrete perspective for the sake of ease of presentation an d derivation. 7.6 Quantum Theory The possibility of extending the theory of ﬁnite relations b eyond what is given in Relativity was investigated in the last section. These co nsiderations led to the conclusion that if such were possible, then the correspo nding theory would have to be a probabilistic one: The foundations of the necess ary form of such a theory were in fact given. Of particular interest was the con clusion that a ﬁnite theory of probability is necessarily a “realistic” one in wh ich probability is a certain propensity for relative frequencies to approach pa rticular limits. These were important but also very general conclusions. The goal o f this section is to continue on to derive a more precise and quantitative theo ry. The natural development of the foregoing theory will lead uniquely to Qu antum Theory, thus giving it a deﬁnite theoretical signiﬁcance quite apar t from any appeal to experimental justiﬁcation. The probability of an attribute has been deﬁned to be its limi ting relative frequency in a random sequence. Suppose that certain attrib utes a αare grouped together and all considered instances of the attribute a. Ca lculation of p(a) must then be such that the appearance of a αin the random sequence adds one to the frequency of occurrence of the a’s, and thus contributes to t he relative frequency also. Consider an initial segment of length n. Suppose a appe ars n atimes, while each a αappears n αtimes. Then n a=/summationtext αnα. Because all terms are positive, limits may be interchanged to derive p(a) = lim n→∞na n=/summationdisplay αlim n→∞nα n=/summationdisplay αp(aα) (7.36) As a special case of this suppose all attributes αare considered to be in- stances of the attribute u. Then /summationdisplay αp(α) = p(u) = 1. (7.37) 73Suppose an attribute a is also considered to be a case of an att ribute b, though not necessarily the other way around. Suppose also th at p(b) /ne}ationslash=0. Con- sider, again, an initial segment of length n. Let na\|bbe the number of attributes a found among the b’s that were found in the initial segment. A lso let n abe the number of a’s found and nbthe number of b’s found. Note that then na\|b = na, and if nb→ ∞ then it follows that n → ∞. Then p(a\|b)≡limnb→∞na\|b nb= limn→∞/parenleftBigna n/parenrightBig /parenleftBig limn→∞nb n/parenrightBig−1 = p(a)[p(b)]−1. (7.38) so that it follows that p(a) = p(a \|b)∗p(b). (7.39) It should be stressed that in order to apply this rule to facto r a probability it must be the case that the occurrence of a implies the occurr ence of b. The considerations above have indicated some relations, ho lding between the probabilities determined by a ﬁnite relation, that must be s atisﬁed, but didn’t tell anything of how these probabilities were, themselves, to be determined. This will be addressed next. In the determination of an appropriate function to represen t a ﬁnite relation there will generally be certain data which is considered to b e dependent on other data and primarily varies and other data which is presumed, a nd not considered to vary. Such is the case, in standard physical theories, wit h dependent variables on the one hand, and with independent variables, parameters , and “physical constants” on the other. Such a segregation of the data is not proven to be absolute, but, rather, is a matter of convenience in stating the relations which are utilized in the theory. For this reason, a means of indica ting a segregation of data will also be adopted here. It has already been shown above that ﬁnite relations must tak e a particular form. Probabilities, being determined by ﬁnite relations, must also take this form, and so must be given as functions of the magnitude, or, e quivalently, of the square of the magnitude, of some complex analytic functi on. The particular way in which a probability is to depend upon the square of the m agnitude of an analytic function must be well-deﬁned and the same for a ll probability calculations but is otherwise unrestricted and so may be det ermined simply as a matter of convenience. It turns out to be convenient to choo se the convention that probability be given, in fact, by the square of the magni tude of some complex analytic function. This choice results in the proba bility function being a measure14and also avails the theory of a geometric analysis on a Hilber t Space, the given magnitude easily being constructed by an inner pro duct15. Combining the above observations results in the following notation an d results: In the context of certain presumed data which are symbolized by “i”, the probability, p(a), of a particular attribute a is given by th e square of the magni- tude of a certain analytic function, referred to from now on a s the corresponding 14See pp. 70-72 of [11]. 15For the relevant functional analysis see, e.g., [49]. 74“probability amplitude”16, determined by the attributes under consideration and evaluated at a. This amplitude is denoted, as was done by D irac17, by <a\|i>. Thus p(a) = \|<a\|i>\|2(7.40) Now suppose that p(a)= \|<a\|i>\|2, p(b)= \|<b\|i>\|2, and p(a \|b)=\|<a\|b>\|2. Applying equation(7.39) results in <a\|i>= eıθ∗<a\|b>∗<b\|i>. (7.41) Here it is to be noted that θ, if it need be determined, must yet be determined by other considerations. In fact, it is a standard insight of Quantum Theory that such exponential factors allow for, and demand, the con servation of such quantities as energy, charge, angular momentum, etc.18. Also, it should be reiterated that this result applies, as does (7.39), only in the case that the occurrence of a implies the occurrence of b. Conversely, whe never an amplitude may be factored into a product of amplitudes it will have to be the case that any corresponding probabilities will be for attributes whi ch are related in this way. The only other relation from probability theory is equation (7.36). It applies in the case when a variety of attributes a αare to be considered to be instances of another attribute a. This leads to the relation \|<a\|i>\|2=/summationdisplay α\|<aα\|i>\|2. (7.42) This rule is evidently not very helpful in determining <a\|i>itself, although it does lead to the conclusion, following the case in (7.37), that\|<u\|i>\|2 =1. In other words, the “total” amplitude must be normalized . Thus the probability rules oﬀer little help, but also little hindran ce, in the determination of the amplitudes that will play a role in the theory. The only possible approach that remains in determining a constructive theory is thus to analyze amplitudes according to the simple fact that they are given by analytic f unctions. A deﬁning characteristic of analytic functions is that they may be expressed as power series sums, and such series may be manipulated term -wise, and ana- lyzed in this way. Consider, then, an amplitude and a power se ries expansion of it. Each of the summands, in order that it may be interprete d in the the- ory, must be somehow related to an amplitude. Each term may, i n fact, be formally analyzed according to the rule in equation (7.41), so that, in general, an amplitude <a\|i>may be analyzed as <a\|i>=/summationdisplay βeıθβ∗<a\|β >∗<β\|i>. (7.43) 16For an exposition of Quantum Theory on this basis, see [50]. 17See [51]. 18See vol. III of [52]. 75It must be remembered that the βare introduced here in a strictly formal sense, for if the occurrence of a were to imply the occurrence of any such βthen application of equation (7.41) would yield <a\|i>= eıδ∗<a\|β >∗<β\|i>. (7.44) and thus the sum in equation (7.43) would have to either degen erate into this single term or else lead to contradictions if more than one di stinct such βwere to be found. On the other hand, if, starting from a situation d escribed by the amplitude <a\|i>given by (7.43), an event described by a particular βis considered to occur, then the amplitude for a would be of the f orm<a\|β > and the transition between these situations could, to needl essly indulge in a “physical” description of what may be considered a logical p rocess, be said to be a case of a “collapse” of the “wave function” <a\|i>. It should be remembered that the theory is derived here under the assumption that the re is no separate realm of experience which may aﬀect the developments within the theory. If the expansion (7.43) is not to refer to any necessary inter mediate process β in the description of the attribute a, then there must be a gre at deal of freedom in the choice of such formally chosen “virtual” attributes. The selection of any particular expansion must, therefor, be justiﬁed on the bas is of calculational advantages. The beneﬁt of this analysis consists in two eﬀec ts. First of all, each summand may be simple and so much so, in fact, that the val ues of such amplitudes may be assumed in the construction of a calculational theory. Such is, in fact, done in the case of the so-called ”bare” mass and ” bare” charge of the electron in Quantum Theory. It may also happen, as a secon d beneﬁt, that the selection of a particular expansion may result in rapid c onvergence of the sum (7.43) so that it might even be terminated after a few term s. At this point it is clear that the above considerations have c ompletely repro- duced Feynman’s formalization of Quantum Theory, includin g a justiﬁcation of the central role played by the Feynman diagram approximatio n technique19but with the advantage of showing that corresponding graph-the oretical concepts naturally arise in the algebraic analysis of φ. It should be noted that this ap- proach, in basing all calculations on a single history, is un suitable for addressing the intrinsic compatibility of quantum theory with “multip le observers”. How- ever, because this approach is avowedly applied as an approx imation, it is also not necessary to do so, for any eﬀects associated with this ki nd of situation may always be relegated to the uncalculated terms in the approxi mation. Another formal consequence of the analytic nature of the amp litudes is of paramount importance when it is desired that exact calculat ions may, in princi- ple, be made. Because expansions of analytic functions, suc h as in (7.43), may be manipulated term-wise in the case of many mathematical op erations, such operations will be linear in the amplitudes. Thus the theory given here may also, for those that prefer to do so, be translated into the coordin ate-free operator formalism which Von Neumann gave to Quantum Theory20, with one important 19See [50] for the quantum formalism, and consult [52] for a dis cussion of the Feynman diagram technique. 20Again, see [12]. 76diﬀerence: Alltransformations of state must now be represented by applica tion of a (Hermitian) linear operator as there can no longer be spe cial procedures for representing “measurements”. This then leads uniquely to a quantum the- ory which is formally identical to that of Everett’s Many Wor lds approach21 although it must be stressed that in the context of this thesi s there is no im- plication of, nor can there be, histories and/or universes w hich are anything butformally separate. As all changes of state are of the same formal natur e, it would be unacceptable, besides merely troubling or unbelie vable, for any to be especially felt as a “split of the universe” or a “branch in on e’s history”. Everett’s derivation of his theory assumed that a Schr¨ odin ger equation was provided for the time evolution of the state, but the theory m ay be derived without this assumption. As Everett has shown, there is, cor responding to a sequence of attributes which deﬁnes a history, a correspon ding sequence of applications of corresponding operators. Each history cor responds, exactly as in Feynman’s sum over histories approach to Quantum Mechanics22, to a summand in the superposition (7.43) which formally represents an am plitude. In this way the superposition may be thought of as a net of histories. Begin with some operator H which is to be a “Hamiltonian” whic h gives the evolution of what is to be considered, by deﬁnition of this ch oice, an “isolated” system. In that case all other operators must represent, by d eﬁnition, “interac- tions”. In examining any history one may then refer to “chang e” whenever H alternates with some other operator. One may then construct a corresponding notion of time for each individual history where distinct po ints in time are iden- tiﬁed by such transitions while interactions shared with ot her histories identify related moments. Everett has shown23that there is a measure on histories which agrees with the probability quantum mechanics assigns to them. Thus, it may be observed here that a direction of a history which progresses towards t he appropriate limiting frequencies may be identiﬁed with the future along that history. This then accounts for the ordinal nature of time. If it is desired that time also possess a measure, then this may be achieved by selecting some operator, T say, distinct from H and identifying any successive interaction s involving T with unit intervals in time along that history. The rate of change will then correspond to the likelihood of such interactions. While all formal histories which correspond to terms in (7.4 3) play a role, they weigh in according to the measure assigned to them - in ot her words, according to their probability: This is the quantal basis fo r the variational form of the laws of physics. It is thus possible to dispense with re latively unlikely histories and, conversely, any initial conditions which ma y play a role in theory must be suﬃciently likely. In this sense initial conditions no longer enter into theory as independent data. This makes sense as, after all, t he distant past, in not being accessible to personal experience, has always bee nreconstructed in light of current understanding or theory . 21See pp. 3-149 of [11] for an exposition of this theory. 22See [53] for an exposition of this theory. 23Refer, once more, to pp. 70-72 of [11]. 77The whole character of the theory is determined, in fact, by H , because identifying H is a matter of identifying when, by contrast, s omething may hap- pen. If an operator has a particular symmetry, then the histo ry corresponding to it will appear with a corresponding degeneracy, or repeat ed appearance, in the superposition (7.43) so that symmetries correspond to p revalent terms and thus to signiﬁcant histories. This explains why the search f or the laws govern- ing quantum-scale interactions has been successfully guid ed by considerations of symmetry. Although this account of quantum theory is by no means a usual one, the formal rigor of all mathematical steps has already b een born out in the references cited and the work done above, with additional co nﬁrmation to be found in the history of the development of quantum theory. The above analysis is self-contained and fully determinate excepting that it remains to explain how the Hamiltonian operator arises as , surely, not just any one will do! Such an explanation will, however, proceed f rom the following discussion which links the above ideas with formally thermo dynamic consider- ations24. First of all, all component histories will, by deﬁnition, co nverge in their futures to the respective probable states corresponding to the analytic state functionφwhich ﬁnitely deﬁnes the system. This being true individual ly, it also follows that all histories proceeding from a single sta teφ, and thus forming a system, will also converge towards mutual equilibrium. This limiting condition is that which is guaranteed by the so-called Zeroth Law of The rmodynamics, wherein a temperature function is introduced to express the conditions of rela- tive equilibrium holding between any collection of systems . That the progress towards the limit identiﬁes a direction in which time “ﬂows” in a particular history is the essential content of the Second Law of Thermod ynamics. The First Law of Thermodynamics is that of Energy Conservati on. It has, however, already been noted, in the discussion following eq uation (7.41), that energy is conserved in quantum theory. It is also well-known that the bound- edness, and general smallness, of the ground state energy of quantal systems leads to the Third Law of Thermodynamics. It may be therefor c oncluded from the above analysis that all of the laws of Thermodynamics fol low within this quantum formalism. Quantal systems being therefor thermodynamic systems, it f ollows that they may be analyzed thermodynamically. Since the theory presen ted here is strictly formal, it necessarily follows that the ensembles used in th e analysis must be (virtual) Gibbs Ensembles. As is always the case in the therm odynamic analysis of a system, the properties of the thermodynamic system are c ompletely deﬁned by the (Grand) Partition Function which corresponds to the G ibbs Ensemble. Such “bulk” properties as the volume and pressure exerted by the system are, in fact, expressible, in a standard way, in terms of the parti tion function25. Now note: Both the partition function and φcompletely determine precisely the behavior of the system so that these functions are interc hangeable! Thus φ 24For an exposition of the required Thermodynamic theory see, for example, vol. I of [54]. 25Refer, again, to [54]. 78will be taken to bethe partition function. Identifying φto be the partition function has immediate consequences. Fi rst of all, asφis necessarily a complex analytic function, it naturally fo llows that this is also the proper way of thinking about the partition fu nction. In this case one no longer introduces the complex “fugacity”26into the partition function as a formal trick but, instead, the question rather becomes h ow one starts with a complex-valued partition function with complex argument s and ends up only concerned with a real-valued partition function with real- valued arguments. In this connection it should be recalled that φis constructed so as to encode certain corresponding complex zeroes. The nature of the events whic h may occur in the given thermodynamic system is therefor determined by the lo cation of these zeroes: There must be certain criteria as to the situation of these zeroes the satisfaction of which results in singular phenomena. At this point it is appropriate to introduce, as a formally ne cessary devel- opment of the ﬁnite case rather than as a merely plausible add ition, a classic result of Yang and Lee27which states that any ambiguity in the value of certain “bulk” variables, such as density, and the corresponding ch anges of “phase” of the system, such as from liquid to solid, must occur precisel y at points on the real axis which are not separated, by any neighborhood in the complex p lane, from the zeros of φ(the partition function). This shows, to begin with, that the variables which are to represent points of transition be tween phases must be real: This justiﬁes requiring all variables, in the end, t o be real-valued. According to this result it also follows that, as the positio ning of the zeroes ofφcorresponds to condensation phenomena, these zeroes also d eﬁne “material structure” in concrete and tactile terms such as pressure, v olume, and temper- ature. Such relatively stable material structure is a candi date for treatment as an isolated system. The symmetries of such systems then will identify corre- sponding Hamiltonians. This self-contained Quantum-Theoretical analysis, like t hat of the Relativis- tic analysis before it, reduces the problem of the variety of concrete experience to that of the problem of the “existence” of anyphenomena whatsoever. In other words, ifφhas any zeroes at all then this automatically engenders a cor - responding physical picture, operating according to the qu antal laws, comprised of interacting phases of matter, such as solids, liquids, an d gases, each occupying certain volumes and “inﬂuencing” one another barometrical ly and thermally or in terms of other recognizable thermodynamic variables (Su ch as, for example, the chemical potential). In reviewing the considerations above it is clear that the at tempt to construct a ﬁnite theory beyond that which is determined by Relativity has resulted in an essentially unequivocal derivation of the mathematical fo rmalism of Quantum Theory. It has done so without appeal to experiment and witho ut accepting the notion of an external realm of experience to which the for malism need refer. In doing this it has been demonstrated that the great variety of physical in- 26Refer to [54] for an explanation of this concept. 27See [55]. 79terpretations of the quantum formalism are, presumably, un necessary, for from a ﬁnite strictly mathematical standpoint a unique propensi ty interpretation of probability and of Quantum Theory arises. 7.7 Conclusions on the Derived Theories In the preceding it has been found possible to derive both Rel ativity and Quan- tum Theory on a strictly conceptual basis. That these deriva tions may have been performed without appeal to experiment obviously unde rcuts the notion that these theories must be thought of as describing or being associated with an external physical reality separate from language. Again, no appeal to experiment has been made, but, rather, th e principle aspects of the phenomena which these theories address have b een shown to follow from strictly formal principles; It should be unders tood that, instead of experiment justifying theory, it has been found that the s cope of thinkable ﬁnitary theory has shown whysuch such phenomena presumably must occur. In particular, Relativity Theory has been argued to uniquel y reﬂect relations which maintain one-to-one relabeling within the ﬁnite gene ral symbolic system. Quantum Theory was subsequently argued to reﬂect every and a nything else that may be called a ﬁnite relation which is not justiﬁed on a R elativistic basis. In particular, it has been indicated that Quantum Theory, in stead of treating of relationships between individual symbols, yields rathe r all ﬁnite relations which govern proper categories or, in other words, are based upon metalabeling relationships as such. As it has been argued that consistency in the utilization of i ndividual sym- bols, together with the conveyance of metalabeling relatio nships between sym- bols, exhausts all that may be required of language, it is to b e expected that Quantum Theory, in virtue of the nature of its construction, should, together with Relativity Theory, provide a complete and consistent d escription, if such is possible, of all ﬁnite relations within the general symbo lic system. This pos- sibility is precisely what is investigated in the next secti on. 7.8 Einstein’s Alternatives and Finite Reality Relativity and Quantum Theory should together, if such is po ssible, comprise a complete ﬁnite theory. It will be found, however, that they are not merely distinct but also, in the context of a ﬁnite restriction of th e general symbolic sys- tem, incompatible. This incompatibility will be shown by an argument similar to one that Einstein gave28. The possible ways of resolving this incompatibil- ity will be investigated and this will lead, on the basis of th e general symbolic system, to plausible far-reaching conclusions about physi cal theory. The general symbolic system now has, in Quantum Theory and Re lativity, two distinct formal procedures which may be applied to the da ta which comprise 28See pp. 168-173 of [56]. 80any given “physical situation”. The question now arises as t o which parts of the data each of the theories is to apply. Is it possible, in other words, to recognize distinctly “classical” data to which Relativity alone appl ies? Relativistic phenomena are characterized by the energy-mo mentum tensor, which is, it may be recalled, the right-hand side of equation (7.22). Conversely, equation (7.22) indicates that this tensor is a function of t he space-time itself, so that a ﬂow of energy must correspond to changes in the space -time manifold. As quantum processes are not energetically isolated it foll ows, therefor, that they too must be dependent, at least in part, on the space-tim e variables. This inﬂuence may also be seen to go the other way, as it is well know n that, in accordance with the Third Law of Thermodynamics, Quantum Th eory results, in a number of cases, in predictions that agree with those of C lassical Physics and, in fact with, Relativity. This is also the content of Boh r’s Correspondence Principle. Because of this limiting behavior there can be no ﬁnitary con ceptual distinc- tion in general between a result produced by quantal laws and a result which is the outcome of local deterministic processes. In short, a s is usually taken as a physical necessity, Quantum and Relativistic processes “ interact”: They may not be considered to be disjoint physical theories which don ’t share common variables upon which they depend. Thus quantum-theoretica l amplitudes must generally depend, in part, on space-time variables. Let a be an attribute which indicates something about events at a particular space-time point P 1. Also let <a\|i>be the amplitude associated with this attribute. Recall that, in a ﬁnite probabilistic theory, th is amplitude must be considered to be a kind of propensity, changes of which the refor have an immediate space-time signiﬁcance. Now consider some attributes βwhich aren’t implied by a so that equation (7.43) may be applied. Then <a\|i>=/summationdisplay βeıθβ∗<a\|β >∗<β\|i> (7.45) holds. Note that βcould represent almost anything. Consider an attribute βwhich indicates something about events at a space- time point P 2. Further suppose that the interval from P 1to P 2is positive. Now the occurrence of β, according to (7.43), requires the formal transition <a\|i>/ma√sto→<a\|β >. If thought about in physical terms, such a change in the amplitude is an immediate “reality”, so that a change at P 2entails an instan- taneous change at P 1. But, even if viewed in a strictly formal sense, this is obviously a violation of the restriction to local interacti ons in Relativity The- ory. Thus, while Relativity and Quantum Theory cannot be kep t apart, they are nevertheless incompatible. There are exactly two assumptions that have been made in the c onstruction of these ﬁnitary physical theories; That there is no necessi ty for a separate realm of experience apart from language itself, and that all descr iptive quantities in the theory must be ﬁnite. At least one of these assumptions mu st be dropped. 81If the ﬁrst assumption is dropped, then, as noted before, the permanent role of experiment entails that there can never be a ﬁnal unde rstanding or ultimate physical theory. If the second assumption is dropp ed then it will be necessary to have a mathematics that can naturally handle in ﬁnite quantities, as was attempted in the physical programme known as “renorma lization”29, and interpret such quantities in a sensible fashion. In orde r to maintain the derivation of the theory of the general symbolic system with out recourse to experiment the second option will next be explored. 7.9 On Generalizing Finite Theories It may have seemed at the time that consideration of inﬁnite q uantities and the development of a Calculus which doesn’t depend upon ﬁnitely deﬁned limits was an extravagance, but it is clear now that there was a deﬁni te justiﬁcation for these steps. In fact, had the Calculus been restricted to the usual ﬁnitely deﬁned operations it would have been impossible to identify the cause of the inconsistency, in a non-empirical setting, with simply the ﬁniteness of the vari- ables, for the operations of the Calculus also went into the d erivation of the theory and might have been connected with the diﬃculties. Having already laid the groundwork, the extension of the pre vious theory to the inﬁnite realm is relatively simple. It has already bee n noted that the operations of the generalized Calculus extend those of the u sual Calculus to the inﬁnite case, so the Calculus may still be applied in the deri vations of exact theory. Suppose now that some equation is to hold in the poten tially inﬁnite case. This same equation must still apply even if all of its ar guments are ﬁnite, but in that case the given equation would have to be part of the theory for the ﬁnite case. It thus follows that the general theory for th e manipulation of symbols is formally identical to, in fact it is determined by the same equations (7.22), (7.40), (7.41), and (7.43) as govern the ﬁnitely-ba sed theory which has already been derived above. The onlydiﬀerence between the ﬁnite and non- ﬁnite cases is, therefor, merely the potentially non-ﬁnite nature of the variables employed in the theory. While an accurate conclusion, it is still not very informati ve to merely imply that the variables in the general symbolic system are (gener ally) non-ﬁnite ana- logues of the ﬁnite space-time coordinates and probabiliti es which characterize the usual Relativistic and Quantum-theoretical formalism s. In order to more deﬁnitely relate the general symbolic system to its ﬁnite re striction it is therefor desirable to introduce the methods of Non-Standard Analysi s. These methods allow for the rigorous deﬁnition and algebraic manipulatio n of non-ﬁnite quan- tities in accordance with the rules of a division ring, as wel l as for a canonical representation of all such quantities as a unique sum of ﬁnit e and non-ﬁnite parts. Non-Standard Analysis, as previously noted, has been rigor ously developed elsewhere, so it is neither necessary nor desirable to go int o much detail in 29See [57]. 82explaining or justifying these methods. It should be helpfu l, however, if an intuitively plausible exposition is provided which, moreo ver, shows that the deﬁnition of the extension of the ﬁnite real number system em ployed in non- standard analysis may reasonably be thought of as arising fr om a generalization, to a non-ﬁnite case, of the notions already introduced in the analysis of the ﬁnite case. The most general kind of relation in the general symbolic sys tem is that which allows for the non-invertible manipulation of symbol s. As was previously indicated, such relations were, in the ﬁnite case, determin ed by the formal rules of Quantum Theory. These rules still apply and will determin e the relations which deﬁne the non-standard extension of the reals. Recall the Quantum-theoretical rule (7.36) and its special case (7.37): These rules, considered respectively, require the ﬁnite additiv ity of probability and that probabilities should be real numbers in the unit interval. C onsidered without regard to the notion of randomness, the development of the th eory of ﬁnite re- lations, in accordance with these rules, leads to the constr uction of a ﬁnitely additive measure on sequences. Given such a measure, m, and a ny two se- quences, {an}and{bn}, the measure may be used to quantify the degree of term-wise agreement between any two such sequences: m {n\|an= b n}gives this measure. In the ﬁnite case the desired T-independence of this measure requires ran- domness of such sequences. It may be recalled that the relati ve frequencies of random sequences necessarily converge to a limit, which is t he probability, and that any two random sequences which correspond to the same me asure are in- terchangable and correspond to the same probability. In thi s sense sequences are, as a natural development within the ﬁnite general symbo lic system, “iden- tiﬁed” according to their having the same limit, so that limi ts play the role of measure in this case. The identiﬁcation of sequences with common limits suggests the construction of equivalence classes /an}bracketle{tan/an}bracketri}htdeﬁned by /an}bracketle{tan/an}bracketri}ht ≡ {{ bn} \|limn→∞(an- bn)=0}. The equivalence between sequences which is thus deﬁned with respect to limits is a very liberal one, there being very many sequences which c onverge to a given limit. In other words, probability, thought of as a mea sure, distinguishes relatively few sequences because it neglects the mode of con vergence of such sequences. Algebraic operations may be deﬁned upon sequences, though i f such opera- tions are to be relevant to, and reliably reﬂected in, the pro babilities associated with such sequences, then these operations must be deﬁned te rm-wise. There- for the deﬁnitions {an}∗{bn} ≡ {an∗bn}and{an}+{bn} ≡ {an+bn}are made. With these deﬁnitions it may be conﬁrmed that the equivalenc e classes corre- sponding to such sequences also satisfy these equations. The above construction of limit-based equivalence classes is reminiscent of the construction of the real number system as a collection of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers. In this derivation algebraic operations on the equivalence classes are like-wise well-deﬁned in ter ms of the corresponding term-wise operations on the elements of representative seq uences from each of 83the classes. In order to generalize the real numbers to the no n-ﬁnite case it therefor is natural to attempt a generalization of this proc edure by replacing the “limit measure” with the least restrictive measure conc eivable. As indicated above, a measure categorizes a sequence accord ing to the value it assigns it. In order to make the greatest number of sequenc es distinct it is necessary to allow the measure to take on the least range of values. This identiﬁes the measure to be employed in the extension of the r eals as the discrete measure, where this measure only takes on either of the two va lues 0 or 1 for any subset of the integers. In order that this measure lead to a nu mber system which extends the reals it is necessary that it assign the value 0 to all ﬁnite subsets of the integers. This corresponds to the indiﬀerence of the “li mit measure” to any ﬁnite portion of a sequence. This requirement also leads to t he conclusion that inﬁnite subsets of the integers have discrete measure 1. Given such a discrete measure m deﬁned on the integers, a new d eﬁnition of equivalence classes of sequences may be speciﬁed in analogy with that already determined by limits. In particular: /an}bracketle{tan/an}bracketri}ht ≡ {{ bn} \|m{n\|an=bn}=1}. When this is done it is easily conﬁrmed that, as before, the additi on and multiplication of equivalence classes is well-deﬁned. It is also clear that the real numbers may be embedded in this scheme with the mapping a /ma√sto→ /an}bracketle{ta/an}bracketri}ht, which takes the real number a to the equivalence class of sequences which contain s a sequence allof the terms of which are identically a. The above construction therefor extends the real number system. This extension is referred to as the h yper-real number system. Unlike before, however, the discrete measure takes into acc ount the whole sequence, and not just its limit, so that it categorizes conv ergent sequences also according to their modes of convergence. To see this in d etail it suﬃces to extend the notion of order to the new equivalence classes: Take /an}bracketle{tan/an}bracketri}ht</an}bracketle{tbn/an}bracketri}ht exactly wherever m {n\|an<bn}=1. Then it may be seen that, according to this deﬁnition, /an}bracketle{t1 n2/an}bracketri}ht</an}bracketle{t1 n/an}bracketri}htand/an}bracketle{tn/an}bracketri}ht</an}bracketle{tn2/an}bracketri}htare examples of inequalities which hold in the hyper-real number system. As may be expected, these in equalities are between what may be referred to, in a precise way, as inﬁnites imal and inﬁnite numbers, respectively. Indeed, a ﬁnite number x may be deﬁned to be one which is bounded by some positive real a so that -a <x<a. Numbers which are not ﬁnite are termed inﬁnite .Inﬁnitesimals are taken to be numbers bounded by allpositive real numbers. The foregoing makes it clear that the hyper-reals constitut e aproper exten- sion of the real number system. Beyond this, the formal relat ionship between the hyper-reals and the embedded ﬁnite real number system ma y readily be made clear30. Consider a ﬁnite hyper-real x. Let a be the least upper bound of the real numbers less than x. Then ǫ=x-a is inﬁnitesimal. The decomposition x = a+ǫis unique. Thus all hyper-reals may be expressed as a unique s um of ﬁnite and non-ﬁnite numbers. With this result it is possible to have an at least intuitive u nderstanding 30Rigorous proof of the following and other results of Non-Sta ndard Analysis may be found in [58]. See, in particular, pp. 1-105 there for an introduct ion to non-standard methods along the lines of the presentation here 84of the hyper-real number system and how it relates to the prev iously devel- oped ﬁnitary theory. It now remains to apply this general und erstanding to see how working in the context of the hyper-real number syste m might resolve the previously mentioned incompatibility between the ﬁnit e Relativistic and Quantum-theoretical formalisms. Consider any combination of Relativistic and Quantum-Theo retic data in the non-ﬁnitary general symbolic system. Express this data as c anonical sums of ﬁnite and non-ﬁnite numbers. The standard (ﬁnite) parts of t he data may then be identiﬁed with the data upon which the ﬁnitary theory hold s. As previously discovered, such restricted data cannot form the basis of a s atisfactory physical theory in the general symbolic system. Such data, while giving a ﬁnite levelof description, do not, however, give the “whole picture” in the non-ﬁnitary case. The residual parts of the data, due to their inﬁnitesimal or inﬁnite nature, while either empiric ally entirely inaccessi- ble or irrelevant in principle in the context of a ﬁnitary the ory, are, nevertheless, critical in resolving the apparent incompatibility of Quan tum Theory and Rel- ativity. Two numbers which diﬀer, even if only by an inﬁnites imal amount, are diﬀerent , and the diﬀerences to be found in the residual parts of data a re pre- sumably the onlymeans of formally rejecting the arguments of the last section. Put more concretely, the non-local correlations which Quan tum Theory for- mally demands but ﬁnitary Relativity forbids are expressed by quantities ne- glected in the ﬁnitary theory. It may be said, in this sense, t hat the elaboration of ﬁnitary theory, while not adopting any axioms, has nevert heless resulted in alevelof description. Changes in such neglected quantities amoun t to signals which may travel at inﬁnite speed and yet are not incompatibl e with the ﬁnitary theory. This is apparently the unique way, String Theory not withstanding, in which the Quantum Theoretical and Relativistic formalisms may be uniﬁed in the general symbolic system. This uniﬁcation also suggests a resolution between the corresponding conﬂict between a preference for a discre te or a continuous mode of description of experience: The non-ﬁnitary general theory comprises a third kind of description which chooses neither over the ot her, and in this context neither probabilistic nor deterministic theory ta kes precedence over the other or is wholely adequate. As a ﬁnal observation, the role which Non-Standard Analysis plays in pre- sumably reconciling Relativity and Quantum Theory as parts of the general symbolic system suggests that an identiﬁcation may be made b etween the no- tion of the externality of the “physical reality” which ﬁnit e empiricism forever appeals to and the presumed conceptual inadequacy of anyﬁnite structures within the general symbolic system. In particular, there isa similarity between these two approaches in that ﬁnitely based empirical theori es are subject to arbitrarily many experimental revisions of their data, whi le the ﬁnite structures of the general symbolic system are themselves subject to inﬁ nite elaboration. If this identiﬁcation is made then, it is proposed, these two approaches may be thought of as being indistinct. While it would be inconsiste nt with the very no- tion of a non-axiomatic theory to demand such an identiﬁcati on, nevertheless it is hoped that such an identiﬁcation might make rejecting ser ious consideration 85of such systems less likely. 86Chapter 8 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The object of this thesis has been the development of a writte n discrete combi- natorial symbolic system based on formal rules for the manip ulation of symbols which apply without regard to the particular meaning of the s ymbols involved. Motivation for the particular rules to be adopted was sought through exami- nation of some contemporary scientiﬁc theories. Beginning with discussions of Linguistics, Metamathematics, and Physics it was found tha t, although each proceeded, in part, from a formal axiomatic basis, there wer e still a number of diﬃculties associated with the incorporation of an addit ional intuited mean- ingful aspect of experience. The discussion of Metamathema tics, however, led to the suggestion that the notions of the truth and the formal provability of any particular assertion were, in part, determined by the fo rmally unrestricted choice of an interpretation. Consequently it was suggested that pe rhaps it is unnecessary and undesirable to make such an apparently arbi trary choice. Per- haps, instead, the formalism could be shown to yield its own i nterpretation and thus avoid the possibility of the formal rules conﬂicting wi th intuition. In order to further motivate and justify this approach a sche matic overview of physics in which, beyond the idealistic presentation of t he introduction, a practical description of the activities of physicists and t heir implicit philoso- phies, as well as a discussion of the history of the developme nt of Physics itself, was given. This presentation clariﬁed the nature of the conﬂ ict between for- malism and intuition and indicated the way in which this diﬃc ulty has been addressed, though by necessity impermanently, through the adoption of either statistical or non-statistical theories. As one is always f ree to adopt theories of either character, it was next attempted to take a step back to a stage prior to theoretical analysis in order to seek a basis for a formal the ory. The ﬁrst stage of the scientiﬁc procedure, prior to that of th eory construc- tion, is that of observation and description. At this point i t was argued, aiming at plausibility rather than proof, that a number of the featu res of experience 87which seem to be merely intuited may nevertheless be shown to derive from a merely formal basis. It was argued, in fact, that while any pa rticular grouping, or categorization, of symbols( such a process being a necess ary prerequisite for any formal theory ) cannot be defended a priori, nevertheles s the mere fac- ultyof being able to adopt some such description leads to the utilization of realistic structures within language. It was therefor deci ded that, even on an intuitive level, the formalism should be based not on the exp ression of “truths” or “facts”, but rather constructed in order to express conti ngency, in which case a theory may be judged completely satisfactory if its elemen ts are convincingly inter-related and the structure of the language is rich enou gh to be descriptive. Such a formal theory was then presented. It was shown that in s uch a theory the freedom of labeling consequent to the absence of facts le ads to groupings of symbols, here called metalabelings, and to a further facili ty for relabeling which, almost paradoxically, enables one to conventionally reserve symbols to be used in particular ways. Such considerations were then applied t o the development of the so-called “general symbolic system”. This system takes the algebraic formof the real quaternions, the system inheriting a partial order based on metalabeling, though it also naturally admits of inﬁnite and inﬁnitesimal quantities. In order to demonstrate the feasibility of such a system it was necess ary to next develop a generalization of the Calculus which is not based on ǫ-δarguments. With this it was possible to complete the development of the formal sys tem, although it remained to demonstrate its relevance by showing its utilit y in application to Physics. Physical theory was developed in accordance with the requir ements of em- piricism which dictate that physical description may be giv en in terms of ﬁnitely many ﬁnite variables. Such a starting point was invoked in ba sing all theory on the location of the zeroes of a complex analytic state func tionφ. Theory was then developed along two lines. First it was shown that Re lativity Theory, including the space-time structure to which it applies, res ulted if it was desired that all operations in the theory should express invertible relations. As was also indicated, it turns out that Turing computability is a n otion which may be thought of as being subsidiary to Relativity Theory. Relativity presumably being the complete expression of det erminism, ex- tension of the theory led to probabilistic developments. It was then argued that the propensity-based probability theory arrived at, e xpressing relations between proper categories, was, in fact, Quantum Theory. As was to be ex- pected, this derivation also serves to justify the assertio n that Quantum Theory is an intrinsically probabilistic theory. The strictly for mal basis of this deriva- tion bypassed the notorious “measurement problem” of quant um theory and resulted in a formalism and descriptive apparatus formally similar to that of Feynman’s Sum Over Histories and Everett’s Many Worlds inte rpretations of quantum mechanics. The resulting perspective is unique, ho wever, in indicating that all features of the dynamical and thermodynamical laws and description, including those materialistic phenomenological aspects o f individual experience described by pressure, volume, and temperature, may be thou ght of as simply being consequences of basing theory on the ﬁnitary state fun ctionφ. 88The ﬁnite application of the general symbolic system had, at this point, reasonably justiﬁed its relevance in comparison with the us ual empirical episte- mology. Investigation of its internal coherence led, howev er, to the interesting conclusion that retaining a formally ﬁnite basis for theory required that the formalism be supplemented by something outside itself, suc h as is done in ex- periment, and yet does not result in a conceptually coherent description of ex- perience. Conversely, retaining a strictly formal perspec tive apparently requires rejecting ﬁnitism and therefor utilizing symbols which cannot be empirically veriﬁed if it is assumed that measurements are represented b y ﬁnite collections of ﬁnite numbers. Extension of the formal theory in such an in ﬁnitary approach turns out to be surprisingly easy and is perhaps the only way t o achieve a desired uniﬁcation of the Relativistic and Quantum-theoretical fo rmalisms. 89Appendix A THE SOLUTION OF FUNCTIONAL EQUATIONS A.1 The Associativity Equation The equation to be solved is F[x,F[y,z]] = F[F[x,y],z]. (A.1) From (A.1) may be derived ∂1F[x,F[y,z]] = ∂1F[F[x,y],z] ∗∂1F[x,y] (A.2) and ∂2F[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂1F[y,z] =∂1F[F[x,y],z] ∗∂2F[x,y]. (A.3) Note that the order of the factors is unimportant because bot h terms in each product are functions of the same variables and therefor com mute. For F not constant in any of x, y, or z it follows that ∂1F[x,y] /ne}ationslash=0 and∂2F[x,y] /ne}ationslash=0. Now (A.2) and (A.3) may be combined in the form ∂1F−1[x,y]∗∂2F[x,y] =∂1F−1[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂2F[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂1F[y,z]. (A.4) This expression may be simpliﬁed by letting G[x,y] =∂1F−1[x,y]∗∂2F[x,y]. (A.5) Then follows G[x,y] = G[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂1F[y,z] (A.6) and G[x,y] ∗G[y,z] = G[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂2F[y,z]. (A.7) 90Now ∂zG[x,y] = 0 = ∂2G[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂2F[y,z]∗∂1F[y,z] + G[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂21F[y,z] (A.8) and ∂y[G[x,y] ∗G[y,z]] =∂2G[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂1F[y,z]∗∂2F[y,z] + G[x,F[y,z]] ∗∂12F[y,z]. (A.9) Subtracting (A.8) from (A.9) results in ∂y[G[x,y] ∗G[y,z]] = G[x,F[y,z]] ∗[∂12F[y,z] -∂21F[y,z]]. (A.10) Now∂12F =∂21F so that ∂y[G[x,y] ∗G[y,z]] = 0. (A.11) This may be solved by G[x,y] =β∗H(x)∗H−1(y) (A.12) where H is any function such that H(y) /ne}ationslash= 0 andβis a constant. Now from this and (A.6) it follows that ∂1F[y,z] = H(F[y,z]) ∗H−1(y). (A.13) Similarly, (A.7) and (A.12) yield ∂2F[y,z] =β∗H(F[y,z]) ∗H−1(z). (A.14) Now deﬁne the function Φ by the requirement that ln(Φ(ω)) =/integraltextω 1H−1(τ)dτ. (A.15) Then ln(Φ(F[y,z])) =/integraltextF[y,z] 1H−1(τ)dτand ln(Φ(y)) =/integraltexty 1H−1(τ)dτ. (A.16) Thus∂yln(Φ(y)) = H−1(y) and, by (A.13), it follows that ∂yln(Φ(F[y,z])) = H−1(F[y,z]) ∗∂1F[y,z] = H−1(y). (A.17) Thus ln/parenleftbigg Φ(F[y,z]) Φ(y)/parenrightbigg = ln(K(z)) for some function K. (A.18) Now (A.14) indicates that ∂zln(Φ(F[y,z])) = H−1(F[y,z]) ∗∂2F[y,z] =β∗H−1(z) (A.19) so that ∂zln(Φ(F[y,z])) = β∗∂zln(Φ(z)) = ∂zln(Φβ(z)). (A.20) 91Thus ∂zln/parenleftbigg Φ(F[y,z]) Φβ(z)/parenrightbigg = 0. (A.21) Now considering (A.18) also this leads to ∂zln(K(z)) = ∂zln(Φ(F[y,z])) = β∗∂zln(Φ(z)). (A.22) Thus, for a constant c, and by (A.18), it follows that ln(K(z)) = ln(Φβ(z)) - ln(c) = ln(Φ(F[y,z])) - ln(Φ(y)). (A.23) This last equation is equivalent to c∗Φ(F[y,z]) = Φ(y) ∗Φβ(z). (A.24) Note that c must be non-zero. Now it remains to determine β. Starting from (A.1) it is evident that c∗Φ(F[x,F[y,z]]) = c ∗Φ(F[F[x,y],z]). (A.25) Applying (A.24) to (A.25) twice results in Φ(x)∗[ c−1∗Φ(y)∗Φβ(z)]β= c−1∗Φ(x)∗Φβ(y)∗Φβ(z). (A.26) and this is equivalent to cβ−1= Φβ(β−1)(z). (A.27) Thus it must be that β= 1 if Φ is not to be constant. The solution of (A.1) is therefor Φ(F[x,y]) = c−1∗Φ(x)∗Φ(y). (A.28) A.2 The Categoricity Equation The equation to be solved is φ(a′) = f(φ(a)). (A.29) This correspondence must hold in all cases, including when a ttention is restricted to a Boolean Lattice. This is the case under which (A.29) will be solved. Let h = Φφ. Then, by (A.28), it follows that c∗h(a∧b) = h(a) ∗h(b). (A.30) Let h(a′) = g(h(a)). From (A.29) it follows that φ(a′) = [Φ−1gΦ]φ(a). (A.31) Thus f = Φ−1gΦ so that ﬁnding f is reduced to ﬁnding g. 92Now, according to (A.29), (A.30), and DeMorgan’s Law, it fol lows that c∗g(h(a∨b)) = g(h(a)) ∗g(h(b)) (A.32) so that h(b) = g(g(h(b))) = g/parenleftbigg c∗g(h(a∨b)) g(h(a))/parenrightbigg . (A.33) Similarly, with the help of (A.33), it follows that c∗h(a′∧b) = g(h(a)) ∗g/parenleftbigg c∗g(h(a∨b)) g(h(a))/parenrightbigg . (A.34) Now (A.30) may be used to evaluate this same quantity in anoth er way; c∗h(a′∧b) = h(b) ∗g/parenleftbigg c∗h(a∧b) g(h(a))/parenrightbigg . (A.35) Then (A.34) and (A.35) combine to yield g(h(a)) ∗g/parenleftbigg c∗g(h(a∨b)) g(h(a))/parenrightbigg = h(b) ∗g/parenleftbigg c∗h(a∧b) g(h(a))/parenrightbigg . (A.36) Consider a special case where a = i ∧j and b = i ∨j. Then a ∧b = a and a ∨b = b. Applying this to (A.36) yields g(h(a)) ∗g/parenleftbigg c∗g(h(b)) g(h(a))/parenrightbigg = h(b) ∗g/parenleftbigg c∗h(a) h(b)/parenrightbigg . (A.37) Let y = g(h(a)), z = h(b), u =c∗g(y) z, and v =c∗g(z) y. Then (A.37) becomes simply z∗g(u) = y ∗g(v). (A.38) Operating with ∂yon (A.38) results in c∗g′(u)∗g′(y) = g(v) - v ∗g′(v). (A.39) Similarly, taking ∂zof (A.38) leads to c∗g′(v)∗g′(z) = g(u) - u ∗g′(u). (A.40) Operating on (A.40) with ∂ynow gives u∗y∗g′′(u)∗g′(y) = v ∗z∗g′′(v)∗g′(z). (A.41) By using (A.38) this may be reduced to u∗g′′(u)∗g(u)∗g′(y) = v ∗g′′(v)∗g(v)∗g′(z). (A.42) 93Equations (A.39) and (A.40) may be solved for g′(y) and g′(z) and the results substituted into (A.42). This results in u∗g′′(u)∗g(u) g′(u)∗(u∗g′(u) - g(u))=v∗g′′(v)∗g(v) g′(v)∗(v∗g′(v) - g(v))=λ( a constant ). (A.43) Evidently, then, the variables u and v may be separated in thi s diﬀerential equation. The ﬁrst integral of the resulting equation is giv en by g−λ(x)∗g′(x) =α∗x−λ(A.44) whereαis a constant of integration. The solution of (A.44) falls into two cases corresponding to λ= 1 andλ/ne}ationslash= 1. Forλ= 1 the solution of (A.44) is of the form g(x) = A ∗xα. Then x = g(g(x)) = g(A ∗xα) = Aα+1∗xα2(A.45) This amounts to A-(α+1)= x(α+1)(α-1). (A.46) This implies that α=±1. Forα= 1, A = ±1. Forα= - 1, A need merely be non-zero. Thus the λ= 1 case solutions are of the form g(x) = ±x, or g(x) = A ∗x−1. (A.47) According to the previous section of the appendix, it was fou nd that ∗for- mally corresponds to ∧. It is necessary, then, that ∗-products may be factored so that an interpretation may be uniquely determined. It may therefor be seen that all of the solutions for g(x), for the λ= 1 case, must be rejected. In particu- lar, g(x) = x obviously doesn’t distinguish x from g(x) in the ﬁrst place. g(x) = -x must be rejected because products of negatives don’t reta in speciﬁc signs for the factors, so that it would be generally impossible to dete rmine which factors represent g(x) for some x. Finally, g(x) = A ∗x−1must also be rejected. In this case it is because the operation of inversion with respect to ∗has already been reserved, by design, for the task of indicating erasures. It would be impossible to necessarily determine, then, whether a factor x−1would indicate that x is to be erased at some point or that it indicates that x is not a mean ingful symbol. There therefor only remains one possible class of solution. Forλ/ne}ationslash= 1 the solution of (A.44) is deﬁned by gr(x) =α∗xr+ B, where r = (1- λ). (A.48) Applying (A.48) twice to (A.38) results in (α2∗cr- B)∗(yr- zr) = 0, so B = α2∗cr. (A.49) In light of (A.49), it follows that substituting (A.48) into x = g(g(x)) results in (1 -α2)∗xr=α2∗(α+ 1)∗cr, soα=±1. (A.50) 94The only solution for the case λ/ne}ationslash=1 which, at least, has not already been found in the previous case is then gr(x) = cr- xr. (A.51) This general solution of this equation requires that comple x numbers be consid- ered, and thus such numbers must be admitted to the general sy mbolic system. Such a number system may be used to distinguish the factor x fr om g(x). Thus the solvability of (A.29) necessitates the inclusion of com plex numbers in the symbolic system, and, conversely, gives a deﬁnite rational e for using such sym- bols. 95Bibliography [1] Pinker, Steven The Language Instinct , W. Morrow and Company, 1994. [2] Papadimitriou, Christos and Lewis, Harry Elements of the Theory of Com- putation , Prentice-Hall, 1981. [3] Pinker, Steven How the Mind Works , Norton, 1997. [4] Hofstadter, Douglas R. G¨ odel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , Vintage Books, 1980. [5] Kleene, Steven C. Introduction to Metamathematics , D. Van Nostrand, 1952. [6] Cohen, Paul J. Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis , W. A. Benjamin, 1966. [7] Robinson, Abraham Non-Standard Analysis , North-Holland Publishing Company, 1966. [8] Szabo, M.E., ed The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen , North-Holland Publishing Company, 1969. [9] Espagnat, Bernard d’ In Search of Reality , Springer-Verlag, 1983. [10] Newton, Isaac, Sir Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica , Harvard University Press, 1972. [11] DeWitt, Bryce S. and Graham, Niell, eds. The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. A Fundamental Exposition by Hugh Ever ett III, with papers by J.A. Wheeler (and others) , Princeton University Press, 1973. [12] Neumann, John von Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , Princeton University Press, 1955. [13] Bell, John S. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy/ J.S. Bell , Cambidge University Press, 1987. [14] Wheeler, J.A. and Zurek, W. Quantum Theory and Measurement , Prince- ton University Press, 1983. 96[15] Baer, Reinhold Linear Algebra and Projective Geometry , Academic Press, 1952. [16] Varadarajan, V.S. Geometry of Quantum Theory , Springer-Verlag, 1985. [17] Bohr, Niels. Essays 1958-1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge , Interscience Publishers, 1963. [18] Hermes, Hans Enumerability, Decidability, Computability. An Introduc tion to the Theory of Recursive Functions , Academic Press, 1965. [19] Neumann, John von Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata , University of Illinois Press, 1966. [20] Neumann, John von Probabilistic Logics and the Synthesis of Reliable Or- ganisms from Unreliable Components , Collected Works, vol. 5, pp. 329-378, 1963. [21] Pears, David Ludwig Wittgenstein , The Viking Press, 1970. [22] Wittgenstein, Ludwig Philosophical Investigations , Macmillan, 1953. [23] Wittgenstein, Ludwig Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , Routledge Humani- ties Press International, 1988. [24] Schilpp, Paul Arthur, ed. Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist , Library of Living Philosophers, Inc., Vol. 7, 1949. [25] Fine, Arthur The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum The- ory, University of Chicago Press, 1996. [26] Popper, Karl. Post-Script to the Logic of Scientiﬁc Discovery , Rowman and Littleﬁeld, 1983. [27] Poincar´ e, Henri The Foundations of Science , The Science Press, 1921. [28] Birkhoﬀ, Garrett. Lattice Theory , AMS Colloquium Publications, vol. 25, 1967. [29] Hilbert, David. The Foundations of Geometry , Open Court, 1971. [30] Dirac, Paul A. M. On Quantum Algebra , Procedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 23, pp. 412-418, July 17, 1926. [31] Aczel, J. Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications , Aca- demic Press, 1966. [32] Aczel, J. and Dhombres, J. Functional Equations Containing Several Vari- ables, Cambidge University Press, 1989. [33] Herstein, I.N. Topics in Algebra , Blaisdell Publishing Company, 1964. 97[34] Einstein, Albert Relativity: the Special and General Theory , Hartsdale House, 1947. [35] Einstein, Albert The Meaning of Relativity , Princeton University Press, 1956. [36] Misner, Charles and Thorne, Kip S. and Wheeler, John A. Gravitation , W.H. Freeman, 1973. [37] Weinberg, Steven Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity , Wiley, 1972. [38] Dirac, Paul A. M. General Theory of Relativity , John Wiley and Sons, 1975. [39] Mises, Richard von. Probability, Statistics and Truth , Dover, 1981. [40] Mises, Richard von Mathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics , Aca- demic Press, 1964. [41] Jauch, Josef M. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , Addison-Wesley, 1968. [42] Shilov, Georgi E. Linear Algebra , Dover, 1977. [43] Einstein, Albert and Infeld, Leopold. On the Motion of Particles in Gen- eral Relativity Theory , Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 3, pp. 209- 241, 1949. [44] Fredkin, Edward and Toﬀoli, Tomasso. Conservative Logic , International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 21, pp. 219-253, 1982. [45] Kolmogorov, Andrei N. Foundations of the Theory of Probability , Chelsea Publishing Company, 1956. [46] Howson, Colin and Urbach, Peter Scientiﬁc Reasoning: the Bayesian Ap- proach , Chicago: Open Court, 1993. [47] Cox, Richard T. The Algebra of Probable Inference , Johns Hopkins Press, 1961. [48] Holland, Peter R. The Quantum Theory of Motion: an Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanic s, Cambidge University Press, 1993. [49] Bachman, George and Narici, Lawrence Functional Analysis , Academic Press, 1966. [50] Feynman, Richard Theory of Fundamental Processes , N. A. Benjamin, 1961. 98[51] Dirac, Paul A. M. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics , Oxford Claren- don Press, 1930. [52] Feynman, Richard and Leighton,Robert and Sands,Matth ewFeynman Lectures on Physics , Addison-Wesley, 1963. [53] Feynman, Richard and Hibbs, A.R. Quantum Mechanics and Path Inte- grals, McGraw Hill, 1965. [54] Kubo, R. and Toda, M. and Saito, N. Statistical Physics , Springer-Verlag, 1991. [55] Yang, C.N. and Lee, T.D. Statistical Theory of Equations of State and Phase Transitions I: Theory of Condensation , Physical Review, vol. 87, number 3, pp. 404-409, 1952. [56] Born, Max The Born-Einstein Letters - Correspondence Between Albert Einstein and Max and Hedwig Born from 1916 to 1955 with commen ts by Max Born. , Walker and Company, 1971. [57] Manoukian, Edward B. Renormalization , Academic Press, 1983. [58] Cutland, Nigel, ed. Nonstandard Analysis and its Applications , Cambridge University Press, 1988. [59] Davis, Martin Applied Nonstandard Analysis , Wiley, 1977. 99
arXiv:physics/0006071v1 [physics.bio-ph] 28 Jun 2000Time series model based on global structure of complete genome Zu-Guo Yu1,2and Vo Anh1∗ 1Centre for Statistical Science and Industrial Mathematics , Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Q 4001, Australia. 2Department of Mathematics, Xiangtan University, Hunan 411 105, P. R. China.† Abstract A time series model based on the global structure of the compl ete genome is proposed. Three kinds of length sequences of the complete ge nome are considered. The correlation dimensions and Hurst exponents of the lengt h sequences are calcu- lated. Using these two exponents, some interesting results related to the problem of classiﬁcation and evolution relationship of bacteria ar e obtained. PACS numbers: 87.10+e, 47.53+n Key words : Correlation dimension, Hurst exponent, Coding/noncodin g segments, complete genome, 1 Introduction The nucleotide sequences stored in GenBank have exceeded hu ndreds of millions of bases and they increase by ten times every ﬁve years. A great deal of information concerning origin of life, evolution of species, development of indivi duals, and expression and regu- lation of genes, exist in these sequences[1]. In the past decade or so there has been an enormous interest in unravelling the mysteries of DNA. It ha s become very important to improve on new theoretical methods to do DNA sequence anal ysis. Statistical analy- sis of DNA sequences[1−9]using modern statistical measures is proven to be particula rly fruitful. There is another approach to research DNA, namely nonlinear scales method, such as fractal dimension[10,11,12,13], complexity[14,16]. The correlation properties of coding and noncoding DNA sequences was ﬁrst studied by Stanl ey and coworkers[5]in their “fractal landscape or DNA walk” model. The DNA walk deﬁ ned in [5] is that the ∗E-mail, Zu-Guo Yu: yuzg@hotmail.com or z.yu@qut.edu.au, V o Anh: v.anh@qut.edu.au †This is the permanent corresponding address of Zu-Guo Yu. 1walker steps “up” if a pyrimidine ( CorT) occurs at position ialong the DNA chain, while the walker steps “down” if a purine ( AorG) occurs at position i. Stanley and coworkers[5]discovered there exists long-range correlation in noncodi ng DNA sequences while the coding sequences correspond to regular random wal k. But if one considers more details by distinguishing CfromTin pyrimidine, and AfromGin purine (such as two or three dimensional DNA walk model[1]and maps given in [14]), then the presence of base correlation has been found even in coding region. Howev er, DNA sequences are more complicated than those these types of analysis can describe . Therefore, it is crucial to develop new tools for analysis with a view toward uncovering mechanisms used to code other types of information. Since the ﬁrst complete genome of the free-living bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium was sequenced in 1995[17], an ever-growing number of complete genomes has been de- posited in public databases. The availability of complete g enomes opens the possibility to ask some global questions on these sequences. The avoided an d under-represented strings in some bacterial complete genomes have been discussed in [1 3, 18, 19]. A time series model of CDS in complete genome has also been proposed in [15] . One can ignore the composition of the four kind of bases in cod ing and noncod- ing segments and only consider the roughly structure of the c omplete genome or long DNA sequences. Provata and Almirantis[20]proposed a fractal Cantor pattern of DNA. They map coding segments to ﬁlled regions and noncoding segm ents to empty regions of random Cantor set and then calculate the fractal dimension o f the random fractal set. They found that the coding/noncoding partition in DNA seque nces of lower organisms is homogeneous-like, while in the higher eucariotes the par tition is fractal. This result is interesting and reasonable, but it seems too rough to dist inguish bacteria because the fractal dimensions of bacteria they gave out are all the same . The classiﬁcation and evo- lution relationship of bacteria is one of the most important problem in DNA research. In this paper, we propose a time series model based on the global structure of the complete genome and we ﬁnd that one can get more information from this m odel than that of the fractal Cantor pattern. We have found some new results to the problem of classiﬁcation and evolution relationship of bacteria. A DNA sequence is a sequence over the alphabet {A, C, G, T }representing the four bases from which DNA is assembled, namely adenine, cytosine , guanine, and thymine. But from views of the level of structure, the complete genome of organism is made up of coding and noncoding segments. Here the length of a coding/n oncoding segment means the number of its bases. First we simply count out the lengths of coding/noncoding segments in the complete genome. Then we can get three kinds o f integer sequences by the following ways. i) First we order all lengths of coding and noncoding segment s according to the order of coding and noncoding segments in the complete genome, the n replace the lengths of noncoding segments by their negative numbers. So that we can distinguish lengths of coding and noncoding segments. This integer sequence is nam edwhole length sequence . 20100020003000400050006000700080009000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600length of gene order number of gene in complete genomeA. fulgidus 0200040006000800010000120001400016000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500length of gene order number of gene in complete genomeB. subtilis 0100020003000400050006000700080009000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500length of gene order number of gene in complete genomeE. coli 010002000300040005000600070008000900010000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800length of gene order number of gene in chromosomeChromosome no. 4 of yeast Figure 1: Length and distribution of coding segments in the c omplete genome or Chro- mosome of some organisms. ii) We order all lengths of coding segments according to the o rder of coding segments in the complete genome. We name this integer sequence coding length sequence . For some examples, we plot the distribution of coding length sequenc es of three bacteria genome and the 4th chromosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) in Figure 1. iii) We order all lengths of noncoding segments according to the order of noncoding segments in the complete genome. This integer sequence is na mednoncoding length sequence . We can now view these three kinds of integer sequences as time series. We want to calculate their correlation dimensions and Hurst exponent s. 2 Correlation dimension and Hurst exponent The notion of correlation dimension, introduced by Grassbe rger and Procaccia[21,22], suits well experimental situations, when only a single time series is available. It is now being used widely in many branches of physical science. Cons ider a sequence of data from 3a computer or laboratory experiment: x1, x2, x3,· · ·, xN, (1) where Nis a large enough number. These numbers are usually sampled a t an equal time interval ∆ τ. We embed the time series into Rm, choose a time delay τ=p∆τ, then obtain yi= (xi, xi+p, xi+2p,· · ·, xi+(m−1)p), i= 1,2,· · ·, Nm, (2) where Nm=N−(m−1)p. (3) In this way we get Nmvectors in the embedding space Rm. For any yi,yj, we deﬁne the distance as rij=d(yi,yj) =m−1/summationdisplay l=0\|xi+lp−xj+lp\|. (4) If the distance is less than a given number r, we say that these two vectors are correlated. The correlation integral is deﬁned as Cm(r) =1 N2 mNm/summationdisplay i,j=1H(r−rij), (5) where His the Heaviside function H(x) =/braceleftBigg 1,ifx >0, 0,ifx≤0.(6) For a proper choice of mand not too big a value of r, it has been shown by Grassberger and Procaccia[22]that the correlation integral Cm(r) behaves like Cm(r)∝rD2(m). (7) Thus one can deﬁne the correlation dimension as D2= limm−→∞D2(m) = limm−→∞lim r−→0lnCm(r) lnr. (8) For more details on D2, the reader can refer to [23]. To deal with practical problems, one usually choose p= 1. If we choose a sequence {ri: 1≤i≤n}such that r1< r2< r3<· · ·< rn, then a scaling region can be found in the ln r−lnCm(r) plane, see [23], p.346. Then the slop of the scaling region i sD2(m). When D2(m) does not change with mincreasing, we can take this D2(m0) as the estimate value of D2. We calculate the correlation dimensions of three kinds of l ength sequences of the complete genome using the method introduced above. Fr om the ln r−lnCm(r) ﬁgures of these sequences of diﬀerent values of embedding di mension m, we ﬁnd that it is 4-8-6-4-20 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11ln(C_m(r)) ln(r)'m=6' 'm=7' -9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11ln(C_m(r)) ln(r)D_2=2.6266m=7 Figure 2: Left) ln r-lnCm(r) ﬁgure of the length sequence of coding and noncoding segments of A. fulgidus when m=6,7. Right) Estimate of the co rrelation dimension (the continuous line). suitable to choose m= 7. For example, we give the ln r−lnCm(r) ﬁgure of whole length sequence of A. fulgidus when m= 6,7 (Figure 2). We take the region from the third point to the 20th point (from left to right) as the scaling reg ion. Hurst[24]invented the now famous statistical method — the rescaled range analysis (R/Sanalysis) to study the long-range dependence in time series . Later on, B. B. Mandelbrot[25] and J. Feder[26]brought R/Sanalysis into fractal analysis. For any time series x= {xk}N k=1and any 2 ≤n≤N, one can deﬁne < x > n=1 nn/summationdisplay i=1xi (9) X(i, n) =i/summationdisplay u=1[xu−< x > n] (10) R(n) = max 1≤i≤nX(i, n)−min 1≤i≤nX(i, n) (11) S(n) = [1 nn/summationdisplay i=1(xi−< x > n)2]1/2. (12) Hurst found that R(n)/S(n)∼(n 2)H. (13) His called the Hurst exponent . Asnchanges from 2 to N, we obtain N−1 points in the ln( n) v.s. ln( R(n)/S(n)) plane. Then we can calculate the Hurst exponent Hof the length sequence of organisms using the least-squares linear ﬁt. As an example, we plot the graph of R/Sanalysis of the whole length sequence of A. fulgidus in Figure 3. 5-0.500.511.522.533.544.55 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ln(R/S) ln(n)H=0.62945 Figure 3: Calculation of Hurst exponent. The Hurst exponent is usually used as a measure of complexity . The trajectory of the record is a curve with fractal dimension D= 2−H([25],p.149). Hence a smaller H means a more complex system. When applied to fractional Brow nian motion, the system is said to be persistent ifH > 1/2, which means that if for a given time period t, the motion is along one direction, then in a succeeding time, it i s more likely that the motion will follow the same direction. For H <1/2, the opposite holds, that is, the system is antipersistent . But when H= 1/2, the system is a Brownian motion, and is random. 3 Data and results. More than 21 bacterial complete genomes are now available in public databases . There are ﬁve Archaebacteria: Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Pyr ococcus abyssi, Methanococ- cus jannaschii, Aeropyrum pernix and Methanobacterium the rmoautotrophicum; four Gram-positive Eubacteria: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M ycoplasma pneumoniae, My- coplasma genitalium, and Bacillus subtilis. The others are Gram-negative Eubacteria. These consist of two Hyperthermophilic bacteria: Aquifex a eolicus and Thermotoga mar- itima; six proteobacteria: Rhizobium sp. NGR234, Escheric hia coli, Haemophilus in- ﬂuenzae, Helicobacter pylori J99, Helicobacter pylori 266 95 and Rockettsia prowazekii; two chlamydia Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumon iae, and two Spirochete: Borrelia burgdorferi and Treponema pallidum. We calculate the correlation dimensions and Hurst exponent s of three kinds of length sequences of the above 21 bacteria. The estimated results ar e given in Table 1 ( we denote 6Table 1: D2,whole,D2,codandD2,noncod of 21 bacteria. D2,whole D2,codD2,noncod Species of Bacterium Category 2.1126 1.3581 1.1612 Mycoplasma genitalium Gram-positive Eubacteria 2.3552 1.7102 1.5077 Mycoplasma pneumoniae Gram-positive Eubacteria 2.5239 1.8891 0.8944 Aquifex aeolicus Hyperthermophilic bacteria 2.5125 1.9094 0.5849 Thermotoga maritima Hyperthermophilic bacteria 2.2705 2.0119 2.2014 Rhizobium sp. NGR234 Proteobacteria 2.4060 2.0378 0.4695 Borrelia burgdorferi Spirochete 2.4561 2.0729 0.6145 Treponema pallidum Spirochete 2.5345 2.1674 1.3001 Chlamydia trachomatis Chlamydia 2.6015 2.3055 1.3187 Chlamydia pneumoniae Chlamydia 2.6096 2.4137 0.8475 Pyrococcus abyssi Archaebacteria 2.5617 2.4589 2.1515 Rickettsia prowazekii Proteobacteria 2.6266 2.4867 0.7011 Archaeoglobus fulgidus Archaebacteria 2.6916 2.5195 1.2134 Aeropyrum pernix Archaebacteria 2.6497 2.5248 0.9239 Helicobacter pylori 26695 Proteobacteria 2.6353 2.5364 0.9555 Helicobacter pylori J99 Proteobacteria 2.7181 2.8417 1.1126 Haemophilus inﬂuenzae Proteobacteria 2.6558 2.8861 1.1427 Methanococcus jannaschii Archaebacteria 2.5687 2.9097 0.6862 M. thermoautotrophicum Archaebacteria 2.8473 2.9250 1.1031 Mycobacterium tuberculosis Gram-positive Eubacteria 2.8984 3.0976 1.3660 Escherichia coli Proteobacteria 2.7039 3.2435 1.1035 Bacillus subtilis Gram-positive Eubacteria byD2,whole,D2,codandD2,noncod the correlation dimensions of whole, coding and noncoding length sequences, from top to bottom, in the increasing orde r of the value of D2,cod) and Table 2 ( we denote by Hwhole,HcodandHnoncod the Hurst exponents of whole, coding and noncoding length sequences, from top to bottom, in the in creasing order of the value ofHcod). 4 Discussion and conclusions Although the existence of the archaebacterial urkingdom ha s been accepted by many biologists, the classiﬁcation of bacteria is still a matter of controversy[27]. The evolu- tionary relationship of the three primary kingdoms (i.e. ar cheabacteria, eubacteria and eukaryote) is another crucial problem that remains unresol ved[27]. From Table 1, we can roughly divide bacteria into two classes , one class with D2,codless 7Table 2: Hwhole,HcodandHnoncod of 21 bacteria. Hwhole HcodHnoncod Species of Bacterium Category 0.3904 0.3311 0.6446 Rhizobium sp. NGR234 Proteobacteria 0.4280 0.4108 0.5640 Pyrococcus abyssi Archaebacteria 0.4063 0.4381 0.5925 Rickettsia prowazekii Proteobacteria 0.4736 0.4660 0.5504 Helicobacter pylori 26695 Proteobacteria 0.4828 0.5147 0.4648 Mycoplasma genitalium Gram-positive Eubacteria 0.5064 0.5343 0.5381 Chlamydia pneumoniae Chlamydia 0.5979 0.5365 0.5873 Helicobacter pylori J99 Proteobacteria 0.4731 0.5445 0.6005 Chlamydia trachomatis Chlamydia 0.5297 0.5698 0.5626 Mycobacterium tuberculosis Gram-positive Eubacteria 0.5410 0.5882 0.4948 Thermotoga maritima Hyperthermophilic bacteria 0.5288 0.5941 0.6843 Mycoplasma pneumoniae Gram-positive Eubacteria 0.5362 0.5985 0.4655 Escherichia coli Proteobacteria 0.5528 0.6017 0.3153 M. thermoautotrophicum Archaebacteria 0.6295 0.6098 0.6311 Archaeoglobus fulgidus Archaebacteria 0.6013 0.6145 0.4605 Aquifex aeolicus Hyperthermophilic bacteria 0.5202 0.6153 0.5136 Haemophilus inﬂuenzae Proteobacteria 0.5727 0.6371 0.4986 Aeropyrum pernix Archaebacteria 0.6830 0.6622 0.6764 Borrelia burgdorferi Spirochete 0.7213 0.6894 0.5612 Treponema pallidum Spirochete 0.7271 0.7183 0.6399 Bacillus subtilis Gram-positive Eubacteria 0.7732 0.7793 0.3607 Methanococcus jannaschii Archaebacteria 8than 2.40, and the other with D2,codgreater than 2.40. We observe that the classiﬁcation of bacteria using D2,codalmost coincides with the traditional classiﬁcation of bac teria. All Archaebacteria belong to the same class. All Proteobact eria belong to the same class except Rhizobium sp. NGR234, in particular, the closest Pro teobacteria Helicobacter pylori 26695 and Helicobacter pylori J99 group with each oth er. Two Spirochete group with each other. Two Chlamydia gather with each other. Gram- positive bacteria is divided into two sub-categories: Mycoplasma genitalium an d Mycoplasma pneumoniae belong to one class and gather with each other, Mycobacteriu m tuberculosis and Bacillus subtilis belong to another class and almost gather with each other. If one classiﬁes bacteria using D2,whole, with the D2,wholeof one subclass less than 2.55, that of the other larger than 2.55, almost the same results ho ld as those using D2,cod. But when one classiﬁes bacteria using D2,noncod , the results are quite diﬀerent. This is quite reasonable because the coding segments occupy the main part of space of the DNA chain of bacteria. A surprising feature shown in Table 1 is that the Hyperthermo philic bacteria (including Aquifex aeolicus and Thermotoga maritima) are linked close ly with the Archaebacteria if we only consider the length sequences of noncoding segmen ts. But when we consider the length sequences of coding segments, they are linked clo sely with eubacteria. We notice that Aquifex, like most Archaebacteria, is hyperthe rmophilic. Hence it seems that their hyperthermophilicity property is possibly controll ed by the noncoding part of the genome, contrary to the traditional view resulting from cla ssiﬁcation based on the coding part of the genome. It has previously been shown that Aquifex has close relationship with Archaebacteria from the gene comparison of an enzyme ne eded for the synthesis of the amino acid trytophan[28]. Such strong correlation on the level of complete genome between Aquifex and Archaebacteria is not easily accounted for by lateral transfer and other accidental events[28]. Our result is based on diﬀerent levels of the genome from tha t used by the authors of [28] From Table 1, one can also see the D2,codvalues are almost larger than the D2,noncod values. Hence the coding length sequences are more complex t han the noncoding length sequences. From Table 2, we can also roughly divide bacteria into two cla sses, one class with Hcod less than 0.60, and the other with Hcodgreater than 0.60. One can see all Archeabacteria belong to the same class except Pyrococcus abyssi. All Gram- positive Eubacteria belong to the same class except Bacillus subtilis. All Proteobacte ria belong to the same class except Haemophilus inﬂuenzae. Two Spirochete group with ea ch other. Two Chlamydia almost group with each other. We also ﬁnd the Hnoncod values of all Archeabacteria except Pyrococcus abyssi, two Hyperthermophilic bacteria, and Mycoplasma genitalium an d E. coli are less than 1 /2, while those of other bacteria are greater than 1 /2. Hence Hyperthermophilic bacteria have some common information with Archaebacteria in noncod ing segments. We calculate D2,whole,D2,cod,D2,noncod Hwhole,HcodandHnoncod of the 4th chromosome 9of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast). They are 2.5603, 2.10 64, 2.5013, 0.5517, 0.6255 and 0.5482 respectively. From Tables 1 and 2, if we consider D2,whole,HwholeandHcod, we can see that Archaebacteria and Chlamydia are linked more close ly with yeast which belongs to eukaryote than other categories of bacteria. There are se veral reports (such as [29]) that, in some RNA and protein species, archeabacteria are mu ch more similar in sequences to eukaryotes than to eubacteria. Our present result suppor ts this point of view. In [14], we ﬁnd that the Hurst exponent is a good tool to distin guish diﬀerent functional regions. But now considering more global structure of the ge nome, we ﬁnd the correlation dimension a better exponent to use for classiﬁcation of bact eria than the Hurst exponent in this level. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS One of the authors Zu-Guo Yu would like to express his thanks t o Prof. Bai-lin Hao of Institute of Theoretical Physics of Chinese Academy of Scie nce for introducing him into this ﬁeld and continuous encouragement. He also wants to tha nk Dr. Bin Wang of ITP and Dr. Fawang Liu at QUT for useful discussions about comput er programmes. This project is supported by Postdoctoral Research Support Gran t No. 9900658 of QUT. References [1] Liaofu Luo, Weijiang Lee, Lijun Jia, Fengmin Ji and Lu Tsa i,Phys. Rev. E 58(1) (1998) 861-871. [2] W. Li and K. Kaneko, Europhys. Lett. 17(1992) 655. [3] A. Grosberg, Y. Rabin, S. Havlin, and A. Neer, Europhys. Lett. 23(1993) 373. [4] (a) R. Voss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(1992) 3805; (b) Fractals 2(1994) 1. [5] C.K. Peng, S. Buldyrev, A.L.Goldberg, S. Havlin, F. Scio rtino, M. Simons, and H.E. Stan- ley,Nature 356(1992) 168. [6] H.E. Stanley, S.V. Buldyrev, A.L. Goldberg, Z.D. Goldbe rg, S. Havlin, R.N. Mantegna, S.M. Ossadnik, C.K. Peng, and M. Simons, Physica A 205(1994) 214. [7] H.Herzel, W. Ebeling, and A.O. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. E 50(1994) 5061. [8] P. Allegrini, M. Barbi, P. Grigolini, and B.J. West, Phys. Rev. E 52(1995) 5281. [9] S. V. Buldyrev, N.V. Dokholyan, A.L. Goldberger, S. Havl in, C.-K. Peng, H.E. Stanley and G.M. Visvanathan, Physica A 249(1998) 430-438. [10] L. F. Lou, Tsai Li, and Y. M. Zhou, J. Theor. Biol. 130(1988) 351. [11] L.F. Luo and L. Tsai, Chin. Phys. Lett. 5(1988) 421-424. [12] Juan Zhen and Zu-Guo Yu, Correlation dimension and Kolo mogrov entropy of DNA se- quences, J. of Xiangtan University 22(1) (2000) 115-119. [13] Zu-Guo Yu, Bai-lin Hao, Hui-min Xie and Guo-Yi Chen, Dim ension of fractals related to language deﬁned by tagged strings in complete genome. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (2000) (to appear). [14] Zu-Guo Yu and Guo-Yi Chen, Rescaled range and transitio n matrix analysis of DNA sequences. Comm. Theor. Phys. (2000) 33(4) (2000) 673-678. 10[15] Zu-Guo Yu and Bin Wang, A time series model of CDS sequenc es on complete genome, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (2000) (to appear). [16] Ruqun Shen, Rensheng Chen, Lunjiang Lin, Jian Sun, Yi Xi ao, and Jun Xu, Chinese Science Bulletin (in Chinese) 38(1993) 1995-1997. [17] C. M. Fraser et al., The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium, Science , 270(1995) 397. [18] Bai-lin Hao, Hoong-Chien Lee, and Shu-yu Zhang, Fracta ls related to long DNA sequences and complete genomes, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals ,11(6) (2000) 825-836. [19] Bai-Lin Hao, Hui-Ming Xie, Zu-Guo Yu and Guo-Yi Chen , Av oided strings in bacterial complete genomes and a related combinatorial problem. Ann. of Combinatorics. , to appear (2000). [20] A. Provata and Y. Almirantis, Fractal Cantor patterns i n the sequence structure of DNA. Fractals 8(1)(2000) 15-27. [21] P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Physica D 9(1983) 189. [22] P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50(1983) 346. [23] Hao Bai-lin, Elementary Symbolic Dynamics and Chaos in Dissipative Systems. World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1989. [24] H.E. Hurst, Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs, Trans. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng. 116 (1951) 770-808. [25] B.B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature , W. H. Freeman, New York, 1982. [26] J. Feder, Fractals , Plenum Press, New York, London, 1988. [27] N. Iwabe et al, Evolutionary relationship of archeabacteria,eubacteri a, and eukaryotes infer from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86(1989) 9355- 9359. [28] E. Pennisi, Genome data shake the tree of life, Science 286(1998) 672. [29] K. Lechner, G. Heller & A. B¨ ock, Nucleic Acids Res. 16(1988) 7817-7826. 11
arXiv:physics/0006072v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 28 Jun 2000On the rˆ ole of mass growth in dusty plasma kinetics A. M. Ignatov∗ General Physics Institute, 38, Vavilova str., 117942, Moscow, Russia S. A. Trigger∗∗ Institute for High Temperatures, 13/19, Izhorskaya str., 127412 Moscow, Russia It is shown that absorption of ions by the dust grain may reduc e the eﬀective translational temperature of the dust component below the ambient gas temp erature. PACS number(s): 52.25.Zb, 52.25.Dg I. INTRODUCTION The kinetic theory of dusty plasmas, which takes into accoun t speciﬁc processes of charging, has been considered on phenomenological basis and used for diﬀerent applications in [1,2]. The form of charging collision integrals consider ed in these papers has been recently rigorously justiﬁed in [3, 4], where also the stationary solution of kinetic equation f or charge and velocity distributions of grains were establish ed. As it has been established in [3] the process of absorptio n of the small particles by grains in dusty plasmas can lead to i nequality of the grain temperature and the temperatures of the light components (even for the case of equal temperatu res of electrons and ions). At the same time the preliminary results of MD simulations fo r the kinetic energy of dust particles [5] demonstrated that mass transfer from light components to dust can be essen tial for the large time scale. The problem of mass transfer is also very actual for the conditions of the experiments wit h growth of grains [6] and formation of new materials [7] in dusty plasmas, as well as for many other applications. There fore the appropriate kinetic theory should be developed, in which a new kinetic variable — the mass of grains — must be in troduced [8]. In this paper we will consider kinetics of the dust particles with variable mass, which increases due to absorption of the ambient plasma and determine the nonstationary distrib ution function for the grains. It is shown that asymptot- ically the eﬀective temperature of the dust component is low er than the stationary temperature of the gas. It means the mass growth leads to the cooling of the dust component. II. KINETIC EQUATIONS Since our main purpose here is to demonstrate the importance of the mass growth, we simplify the problem ignoring the grain charge. In other words, we treat a plasma as a neutra l gas. We adopt here that in process of an elementary collision a grain absorbs every atom hitting its surface. An atom transfers its momentum to a grain and, respectively, the mass of a grain changes. Therefore generally the distrib ution function of the dust component depends both on grain momenta, P, and masses, M. It should noted that the assumption of the complete absorpti on seems justiﬁed under the conditions of the experi- ments aimed at the plasma synthesis of ﬁne grains [6,7]. Othe rwise, an ion hitting the grain surface rather leaves it as a neutral atom carrying away some momentum. The latter may be ignored if the surface temperature of a grain is, by some means, below the ion temperature. The appropriate kinetic equation describing the process ma y be written as d fd(P, M, t) dt=Id(P, M, t) = /integraldisplay dpfn(p){w(p,P−p, M−m)fd(P−p, M−m)−w(p,P, M)fd(P, M)}, (1) where fn(p) is the distribution function of neutral atoms of the mass m. The probability of absorption is given by 1w(p,P, M) =σ(M)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleP M−p m/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle, (2) where the cross-section, σ(M), generally is mass dependent. For example, assuming the pe rmanent speciﬁc gravity of the grain material results in σ(M)∝M2/3. The distribution function in Eq. (1) is normalized to the av erage density: nd=/integraldisplay dPdMf d(P, M). The evolution of the neutral gas distribution is governed by d fn(p) dt=−/integraldisplay dPdMw(p,P, M)fd(P, M)fn(p). (3) Evidently, the set of kinetic equations (1,3) provides the c onservation of the net number of dust grains and the total momentum. The total energy is no longer conserving quantity . The physical reason for this is fairly obvious: a part of kinetic energy of a colliding atom is transferred to the ki netic energy of a dust grain, while the remainder is spend for the heating of the grain surface. The latter part of the en ergy balance is out of our consideration. The collision term in Eq. (1) is greatly simpliﬁed by expandi ng it in powers of a small ǫ=m/M ratio. Straightfor- ward expansion of Eq. (1) results in Id(P, M) =∂ ∂Pi/bracketleftbigg −βig(P, M) +λijPjg(P, M) +∂ ∂Pj(πijg(P, M))/bracketrightbigg −∂ ∂M(jg(P, M)), (4) where g(P, M) =σ(M)fd(P, M). The kinetic coeﬃcients introduced in Eq. (4) are expresse d in terms of the gas distribution: j=/integraldisplay dppfn(p), (5) βi=/integraldisplay dpp mpifn(p), (6) λij=1 M/integraldisplay dppipj pfn(p), (7) πij=1 2m/integraldisplay dpppipjfn(p) (8) The ﬁrst term in Eq. (4) arises due to the possible anisotroph y of the ambient gas distribution. Formally, this term is proportional to ǫ1/2. The remaining terms describing diﬀusion in the phase space and mass growth are of the order ǫ. With suﬃciently small number of dust grains one can ignore th e deviation of ambient gas from initial distribution. Assuming that fn(p) is given by Maxwellian distribution with the temperature, Tn, and particle density, nn, we get d fd(P, M, t ) dt=j0/braceleftbiggg(P, M) M+P 3M∂g(P, M) ∂P+2 3Tn1 P2∂ ∂PP2∂g(P, M) ∂P−∂g(P, M) ∂M/bracerightbigg , (9) where it is also supposed that the dust distribution is isotr opic. The coeﬃcient, j0, in Eq. (9) is the mass ﬂow at the grain surface, j0=nn/radicalbig 8Tn/π. It should be noted that with the last term in the right-hand si de of Eq. (9) omitted, i.e., in neglecting the process of the mass growth, there is an exact stationary solution to E q. (9) in the form of Maxwellian function with the temperature Td= 2Tn. The same conclusion stems also from the more general approa ch of [3]. III. TEMPERATURE EVOLUTION With the help of Eq. (9) we study the evolution of the temperat ure of the dust component. Although it is possible to obtain the general solution to Eq. (9), the corresponding expression is rather bulky (see Appendix) and little informative. To grasp the rˆ ole of the mass growth one can neg lect the mass dispersion of the dust component looking for the solution in the form of 2fd(P, M, t ) =F(P, t)δ(M−µ(t)). (10) Substituting this into Eq. (9) yields dµ(t) dt=j0σ(µ(t)) (11) ∂F(P, t) ∂t=j0σ(µ(t))/braceleftbiggF(P, t) µ(t)+P 3µ(t)∂F(P, t) ∂P+2 3Tn1 P2∂ ∂PP2∂F(P, t) ∂P/bracerightbigg . (12) Eq. (11) shows that the mass of all grains increases with the r ate determined by the current value of the cross-section. The solution to the second equation (12) is sought in the form of the Maxwellian distribution F(P, t) =nd (2π∆)3/2e−P2/2∆(13) with the time-varying eﬀective temperature, ∆ = Teff(t)µ(t). Substituting Eq. (13) to Eq. (12) we get dTeff(t)µ dt=2 3j0σ(µ)(2Tn−Teff(t)). (14) In neglecting the mass growth, as it was already mentioned, t he stationary state of the dust component is char- acterized by the eﬀective temperature twice as the gas tempe rature, Teff= 2Tn. However, the joint solution of Eqs. (11,14) results in Teff(t) =4 5Tn+Cµ(t)−5/3, (15) where Cis an integration constant. Thus, the mass growth yields coo ling of the dust component below the gas temperature, Teff→4 5Tn. IV. CONCLUSIONS We have considered the kinetic equation for the ensemble of g rains imposed in neutral gas. The process of gas absorption by grains leads to the time dependence of grain di stribution function due to the mass growth of the dust particles. For the Maxwellian distribution of neutral gas w e found the general nonstationary solution of the kinetic equation with variable mass. The average kinetic energy of g rains, that is, the eﬀective temperature of the dust component, tend to the stationary values. The process of est ablishing of the eﬀective temperature can be interpreted in this case as an eﬀective cooling. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was performed under the ﬁnancial support granted b y the Netherlands Organization for Scientiﬁc Re- search (NWO), grant # 047-008-013. One of as (A.M.I.) also ac knowledges the support from Integration foundation, project # A0029. APPENDIX A: It is a matter of straightforward substitution to verify tha t the general solution to Eq. (9) with an initial condition fd(P, M, 0) =f0(P, M) is given by fd(P, M, t ) =∞/integraldisplay 0dP′P′M2/3σ(µ(M, t)) Pµ(M, t)1/3σ(M)1/radicalbig π∆(M, t)exp/parenleftbigg −P2M2/3+P′2µ(M, t)2/3 4∆(M, t)/parenrightbigg sinh/parenleftbiggPP′M1/3µ(M, t)1/3 2∆(M, t)/parenrightbigg f0(P′, µ(M, t), (A1) 3where µ(M, t) is a root of the equation M/integraldisplay µ(M,t)dM′ σ(M′)=j0t (A2) and ∆( M, t) =2 5Tn/parenleftbig M5/3−µ(M, t)5/3/parenrightbig . Evaluating the average kinetic energy, ∝an}bracketle{tP2/2M∝an}bracketri}ht, with the help of Eq. (A1) one can verify that it tends to 6 /5Tneven for an arbitrary mass distribution. ∗Electronic address: aign@fpl.gpi.ru ∗∗Also at Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, MB 5600 Eindhoven, The Netherlands [1] A.M.Ignatov, Plasma Phys. Rep., 24 (1998) 677 . [2] S.A. Trigger, P.P.J.M.Schram, J.Phys. D: Applied Phys., 32(1999) 234 . [3] A.G.Zagorodny, P.P.J.M. Schram, S.A.Trigger, Phys.Re v.Lett. 84 (2000) 3594 . [4] P.P.J.M.Schram, A.G.Sitenko, S.A.Trigger, A.G.Zagor odny, Phys.Rev. E, submitted, May 2000. [5] A.M.Ignatov, S.A.Maiorov, P.P.J.M.Schram, S.A.Trigg er, P.N. Lebedev Inst. Rep., in print, 2000. [6] F. Vivet, A. Bouchoule, L. Boufendi, J. Appl. Phys. 83 (19 98) 7474 [7] E.Stoﬀels,W.W.Stoﬀels,G.M.W.Kroesen, F.J. de Hoog, J .Vac.Sci.Technology, A14 (1996) 556 . [8] S.A.Trigger, Abstracts and Proceedings of IV European W orkshop on Dusty and Colloidal Plasmas, 3-5 June 2000, Costa da Caparica, Portugal. 4
arXiv:physics/0006073v1 [physics.ed-ph] 28 Jun 2000Work performed by a Classical-“reversible”-Carnot cycle: Raising’s distribution for the small ”driving weights”. Francesco di Liberto∗ INFM and INFN, Sezioni di Napoli Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Universit` a di Napoli “Fe derico II” Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo Via Cinthia Lotto G. I-80126 Napoli, Italy February 2, 2008 Abstract The expansions or the compressions of the ideal gas in the qua si-static Carnot cycle, can be performed (on adiabatic or isothermal w ay) by slowly increasing or decreasing the external pressure by means of s mall weights acting on the piston of the vessel containing the gas. We call them shortly the “driving weights” ( dw). Let Nbe their number, a large one. To determine the work performed by the ideal gas in the cycle t he “driving weights” must be handled carefully. If we let them m ove on-oﬀ the piston only horizontally, their vertical motions will b e due only to the gas. Here we show that, at the end, while some of them will have moved down (will have negative raising) the remaining ones (the ma jority) will have moved up (will have positive raising) so that the total w ork performed by the ideal gas equals the total variation of the gravitatio nal potential energy of the “driving weghts”. The cycle is performed in 2 Ntime-steps. For each step ti, i∈ (1,..,2N),we give H(ti) and ∆ H(ti−1,ti),respectively the height and the raising of the piston. Moreover the overall raising of th e individual dw′s(i.e.hk,k∈(1...N) ),and their distribution are given in simple, general cases. The eﬃciency and the dissipated work are also evaluated. This paper is aimed at imparting a deeper understanding of th e ideal Carnot Engine and may also be useful as a segment in a didactic path on elementary calculus and statistics. ∗e-mail: diliberto@na.infn.it 1PACKS: 05.50 1 Introduction To perform an ideal gas quasi-static-“reversible”[1]-Car not-cycle, we need an heat source, an heat sink, a vessel with a mobile piston and many sm all ”driving weights” to increase or decrease slowly the external pressu re (both for the isothermal and adiabatic processes).[2]-[5] To determine the work performed by the ideal gas in the cycle t he “driving weights” ( dw) must be handled carefully. Therefore we let them move on-oﬀ the piston only horizontally. To this end we assume that the hand le of the piston be endowed of so many consoles that we can move each dwhorizontally from (or to) the corresponding ﬁxed console as reported in Figure 1. The piston is mobile, so when we increase the external pressu re the last coming dw(together with the previous ones) goes down. In the opposite case (expansion) the chosen dwgoes at rest on the console in front of it and the others go up. “In this way you can ﬁnd out the work performed by the ideal gas in the cycle: you will ﬁnd it in the increased potential energy of so me of the dw′s”, I said in the last 25 years in the thermodynamic class at the Uni versity of Naples. Sometimes in these years some clever student replayed: “I ha ve thought a lot about that and it seems to me that the dw′sgo down”. My reply has been always “You have to think more, because the work performed by the gas must necessarily increase the potential Energy of the dw′s”.[6] Recently I decided to do a Java Applet [7] to show the raising o f thedw′s and, in writing down some elementary relations, I have found out that the clever students were not totally wrong. In the following I report on a simple Carnot- cycle done through the ideal device given in Figure 1 and show that, at the end of the cycle, some of the dw′swill have moved down (will have negative raising) while the remaining ones (the majority ) will have m oved up (will have positive raising) so that the total work performed by the ide al gas equals the total variation of the gravitational potential energy of th e “driving weights”. In particular in Sec.2 is given an example of a Carnot-cycle don e in 2 Nsteps. In the ﬁrst Nsteps the dw′sare added on the piston to perform ﬁrst an isothermal compression and then an adiabatic compression. In the remai ningNsteps the dw′sare removed from the piston in order to return to the initial s tate. The cycle is reported in Figure 2. The height and the raising of the pist on et each step i.e. H(ti) and ∆ H(ti−1, ti) =H(ti)−H(ti−1),are also calculated and reported in Figure 3 and Figure 4 In Sec.3 we evaluate the raising of each dwat the end of the cycle. To ﬁnd the raising of the dwwhich was put on the piston at one given time step, one must know when it has been removed. The order in which the dw′sare removed is quite arbitrary and actually there are N! ways in which the removing process 2Figure 1: a) The adiabatic vessel with some dw′son the piston; a= 10 cm, b= 27 cm, c = 54 cm. V box=abc= 14580 cm3= 14.58l. V0= 22.4l=Vbox+ H0S,where H0= 78.2cm,S=aa= 100 cm2b) The adiabatic vessel together with two supports for the dw′s 3can be done. We analyze two main non-random removing process es: for both of them the overall raising of the single dwis related to the sum of the raisings of the piston for the time-steps in which the dw‘lived’ on the piston and hence to the diﬀerence of the height of the piston between the time at whic h it was removed and at which it was added on the piston . The results are shown i n Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8. In Figure 5 one can understand, directl y from the P−V representation of the cycle, why some dw′shave negative raising. In Sect. 4 the relation which connects the raising of the single dwto the expansion of the gas is obtained in an alternative way. The eﬃciency of the engine is evaluated in Sec.5 while the entropic gains are estimated in Appendix. 2 The cycle and the raising of the piston One mole of ideal gas (e.g. dry air) is contained in the vessel shown in Figure 1, and it is initially in thermal contact with the heat reservoi r atT0= 273 .15K. The initial volume of the gas is V0= 22.4l.LetP0= 1atm= 101 .3KPa be the external pressure on the piston and let the piston be mass less so that at the initial stage also the pressure of the gas is P0.For the dry air γ=Cp Cv= 1.4. The cycle we realize is reported in Figure 2. It is done in 2 Ntime-steps. In the ﬁrst Nsteps the pressure P(ti), i∈(1..N) increases. At each step we add on the piston a single dw. Let its mass be m= 0.1Kg.Since the surface of the piston is S= 100 cm2,this implies that at each step we are increasing the pressure of a relatively small amount. The degree of irre versibility for this step-wise process is evaluated in Appendix. In the ﬁrst Nsteps we have P(ti) P0=z+i z where P(t0)≡P0is the initial pressure, iis the number of dw′son the piston at step tiandz= 1033 is the number of grams whose weight on 1 cm2give the pressure of 1 atm.Therefore P(ti) =P0+i∆Pwith ∆ P=1 zP0=1 1033P0.In the second Nsteps the dw′sare removed. As at each step a single dwis removed, forP(tN+l), l∈(1...N) we have P(tN+l) =P0+ (N−l)∆Pand P(tN+l) P0=z+N−l z=P(tN−l) P0 but obviously V(tN+l)/negationslash=V(tN−l) . The choice of the values of Nandn1(the number of steps of the isothermal process at T0) are somehow free, even if they depend on the geometry of the vessel and on choice of the mass of the single dw. Here we ﬁnd convenient the values N= 610 and n1= 410. 4Figure 2: The Carnot-cycle .It is step-wise but the steps are very small. P0V0−> P AVAis the isothermal process at T0= 273 .15,(PA= 1.3969 atm,VA= 16.034l). PAVA−> P BVBis an adiabatic process ( PB= 1.5905 atmandVB= 14.614l).PBVB−> P CVCis the isothermal process at T= 283 .47 (PC= 1.1385atm and V C= 20.416l). PCVC−> P 0V0is the ﬁnal adiabatic process. 5The state PAVAis therefore reached in n1time-steps in isothermal conditions. The height of the piston at each step, i.e. H(ti) can be determined from the ideal gas state equation P(ti)V(ti) =RT0,which, together with the relation V(ti) =Vbox+H(ti)S (1) gives H(ti) =H0+V0 S(P0 P(ti)−1) (2) From this we can evaluate step by step the raising of the pisto n ∆H(ti−1, ti) = H(ti)−H(ti−1)≡∆H(ti),therefore ∆H(ti) =V0P0 S/parenleftbigg1 P(ti)−1 P(ti−1)/parenrightbigg (3) Let denote with H1(ti) and ∆ H1(ti) the values given by relations (2) and (3), which are relative to the ﬁrst n1steps. It is obvious that for each isothermal step ∆ T(ti) = 0; not obvious is the estimate of the Entropic change of the Universe for an isothe rmal step, in the Appendix we ﬁnd ∆ SU(ti)≃R(∆P P)2,where Ris the Universal gas constant. The state PBVBis reached in n2= 200 time-steps in adiabatic conditions (thermal contact replaced by an adiabatic wall). For the adi abatic steps we cannot use P(ti)V(ti)γ=Const. Nevertheless by means of the First Law of thermodynamics and the equation of state of the ideal gases i n the Appendix we ﬁnd that ∆V(ti) =−V(ti−1) γ∆P P(ti) i.e. ∆H(ti) =−V(ti−1) γS∆P P(ti)(4) Let call ∆ H2(ti) the raising of piston. From (4) we can evaluate H2(ti),the height of the piston in each of the n2adiabatic steps. The ﬁnal height reached is HB=H2(tN) = 0 .344cm. In the adiabatic compression the temperature of the ideal ga s increases at each time-step. The thermal increase at each step can be calculat ed taking in account the First Law of Thermodynamics for an adiabatic process, i. e. ∆U=−P∆V, and the ideal gas property ∆ U=CV∆T,where Uis the Internal Energy and CV the molar speciﬁc heat at constant volume. We have ∆T(ti) =−P(ti) CVS∆H(ti) (5) 6Figure 3: Height of the piston step by step. H0= 78.2cm. H B= 0.342cm The ﬁnal temperature is TB= 283 .47Ko.The entropic change for an adiabatic step is ∆ SU(ti)≃R γ(∆P P)2(see Appendix). To reach the initial state P0V0,we needn3= 467 isothermal steps and n4= 143 adiabatic steps. Removing n3dw′sfrom the piston in isothermal conditions (thermal contact with the heat source TB) we get the state PCVC.For this expansion we have H3(ti) =PBVB SP(ti)−Vbox S=HB+VB S(PB P(ti)−1) (6) from which the raisings of the piston ∆ H3(ti) can be evaluated. Observe that in the expansions ∆ H≥0 and∆P P0=−1 1033.Moreover ∆ T(ti) = 0 and ∆S(ti)≃R(∆P P)2(see Appendix) Finally removing the last n4dw′sin adiabatic conditions we come back to the initial state V0, P0, T0.In this last process we can evaluate ∆ H4(ti) trough a relation similar to (4). H4(ti) can consequently be determined. Now at each step the temperature decreases; the entropic change, as bef ore, is ∆ SU(ti)≃ R γ(∆P P)2(see Appendix) In Figure 3 we give the height of the piston for each step. Fig 4 reports the raising of the piston for each step. 3 Raising of the single dw′s 7Figure 4: Raising of the piston step by step.Observe the disc ontinuities in the raising of the piston going from the isothermal process to th e adiabatic process andvice-versa. i.e. around the states A, B and C In this section we ﬁnd the raising of each dwand show that some of them move down (have negative raising) and that the remaining majorit y move up (have positive raising). The history of the single dwis relevant to evaluate its raising. To this end let us label each dw. The kthdwis the one placed on the piston at thekthtime-step ( k∈(1...N)). So the Nthdwis the last one. The raising of the kthdwat the end of the cycle, hk,is its vertical shift on the support, i.e. the diﬀerence between the ﬁnal and the initial position on the su pports. Really relevant is the order in which they are removed from th e piston. Two are the possible ways in which we can start to remove them: a) from the Nth, b) from the ( N−L)thwith 1 ≤L < N . In the following we report on both cases for non-random proce sses: in the casea) we start from the Nthand continue with the ( N−1)thuntil the 1th; in the caseb) we start from the ( N−L)th,go on with the ( N−L+ 1)thuntil the Nth and then continue with the ( N−L−1)thuntil the 1th.We call these processes respectively a−processes andb−processes . Obviously the expansion process can be done in N! ways. For example you can start with Nthdw,go regularly to the ( N−R)ththen jump to the ( N−2R)thand then return to the ( N−R)th and continue; otherwise you can start from the ( N−L)thgo to the Nth,jump to the ( N−2L)th,return to the ( N−L−1)thand so on and so on. Once all the possible regular processes have been exhausted one can g o to the random- 8processes. The nice aspect is that for each process we have a d iﬀerent distribution of the hk. With the complexity of the distribution of the hkwe recover some of the complexity of the microscopic behavior of the ideal gas. a−processes. Let the ﬁrst removed be the Nth.The individual raising are related to the raising of the piston, therefore it is clear th athN, the raising of the last dw(which has been on the piston just for one step) is given by hN= ∆H(tN) =H(tN)−H(tN−1) and for the last but one dw(which has been on the piston just for two steps) it is clear that hN−1= ∆H(tN−1) + ∆H(tN) + ∆H(tN+1) =H(tN+1)−H(t(N−1)−1). Therefore for the ( N−r)thdw, with r∈(0, .., N−1),we have hN−r=N+r/summationdisplay i=N−r∆H(ti) =N/summationdisplay i=N−r∆H(ti) +N+r/summationdisplay i=N+1∆H(ti) = (7) =H(tN)−H(tN−r−1) +H(tN+r)−H(tN+1−1) = =H(tN+r)−H(tN−r−1) which immediately gives hN−r=1 S[V(tN+r)−V(tN−r−1) ] (8) This last relation is useful since it enables to appreciate t he raising of the dw directly from an inspection of the P−Vdiagram of the Carnot-cycle : we have only to observe that V(tN+r) is the volume occupied by the gas in the expansion at pressure P(tN+r) and that V(tN−r−1) is the volume in the compression at the lower pressure P(tN−r−1) =P(tN−r)−∆P.In this way at each step we can ﬁnd δV=V(tN+r)−V(tN−r−1), which is relative to just one ∆ P.From the P−V diagram of the Carnot-cycle we see that δVis negative only for the ﬁrst steps and last steps, respectively. In ﬁg 5, on a schematic representa tion of the extremities of the cycle, some positive and negative δV’s are shown. Therefore we see that the raising hkisnegative only for the ﬁrst and the last steps and is positive for all the others. From this analysis, moreover, we can underst and that for the a−processes the number of negative raisings depends on how big is ∆ P.For ∆P→0 that number goes to zero. The values of hN−rare obtained from equation (8) together with relations (2), (4), (6) and are reported in Figure 6. Now we go to b−processes. If the ﬁrst dwremoved is the ( N−L)thwith 1 ≤L < N , the histories of the single dw′schange. The ( N−L)thdwhas been on the piston during the last L+ 1 steps of the compression and we have hN−L=N/summationdisplay i=N−L∆H(ti) =H(tN)−H(tN−L−1). (9) 9Figure 5: a) Positive and negative values of ∆ Varound the Nthstep. b) Positive and negative values of ∆ Varound the 2 Nthstep. The representation is schematic: the step-wise aspect of the cycle is not reported . For (N−(L−1))thdw, which has been on the piston for the last Lsteps of the compression and for the ﬁrst step of the expansion (that o ne in which the (N−L)thdwis removed) we have hN−(L−1)=N/summationdisplay i=N−(L−1)∆H(ti) + ∆H(tN+1) =H(tN+1)−H(tN−L) (10) Therefore, if we denote with hL N−rtheb−processes raising, for r≤L,we have hL N−r=N/summationdisplay i=N−r∆H(ti) +N+L−r/summationdisplay i=N+1∆H(ti) =H(tN+L−r)−H(tN−r−1) (11) which gives hL N−r=1 S[V(tN+L−r)−V(tN−r−1)] (12) This relation too is useful to appreciate the raising of the dw′sdirectly from an inspection of the P−Vdiagram of the Carnot-cycle : we can observe that V(tN+L−r) is the volume occupied by the gas in the expansion at pressure P(tN+L−r) =P0(z+N−(L−r))/zand that V(tN−r−1) is the volume in thecompression at the pressure P(tN−r−1) =P0(z+N−r−1)/z.SoδV= V(tN+L−r)−V(tN−r−1) is relative to a δP=P0(2r+ 1−L)/z,and it is possible to see that for δP > 0 we have δV < 0 and hence hL N−r<0 and for δP < 0 we have δV > 0 and hence hL N−r>0. For example, for r=Lwe have δP= 10Figure 6: Distribution of the overall rising for each dw in th ea−processes . The overall rising is the vertical shift of the single dw on the su pport i.e. the diﬀerence between the ﬁnal position and the initial position on the sup port. The top two graphs are magniﬁcations of the initial and ﬁnal part of the b ottom graph and show that the last dw’s and the ﬁrst ones have negative raisin g 11Figure 7: Distribution of the overall rising for each dw in th eb−processes for L= 25 δPmax=L+1 zP0>0, to which corresponds the maximum negative raising hL N−L; forr= 0 we have δP=δPmin=1−L zP0<0, to which corresponds the maximum positive raising hL N. The values of hL N−rcan be calculated using relation (12) together with (2), (4), (6). Forr > L, the way in which the previous L dw′shave been removed has no inﬂuence. Therefore, for r > L everything is as in the a−processes hL N−r=hN−r=H(tN+r)−H(tN−r−1) (13) In Fig 7 and Fig 8 we report the distributions of hL N−rforL= 25 and L= 50. We point out that the relationship L/summationdisplay r=0hL N−r=L/summationdisplay r=0hN−r (14) is fulﬁlled for these two processes since the work performed by the ideal gas in the cycle is the same, whichever removing process is perform ed. This identity can be veriﬁed using relations (8) and (12). We conclude this section pointing out that a deeper insight i n the cycle can be obtained through the time-dependent raising hN−r(tN+l) forl∈(1...N).The raising we are dealing with in this paper are the hN−r(t2N) i.e. the raising of the dw′sat the end of the cycle. 12Figure 8: Distribution of the overall rising for each dw in th eb−processes for L= 50. 4 Engine work and raising of the dw′s The work performed by the ideal gas in our step-wise Carnot-c ycle,W,is clearly given by W=2N/summationdisplay i=1Pi∆Vi (15) For a reversible cycle Wrev=/contintegraldisplay PdV (16) It comes from the elementary calculus that it can be written. /contintegraldisplay PdV−2N/summationdisplay i=1Pi∆Vi≃\|∆P\| P. (17) From physics point of view it is clear that 2N/summationdisplay i=1Pi∆Vi=mgN/summationdisplay i=1hi (18) 13where gis the gravity acceleration; but to prove this relation we ne ed a little of algebra. It is worth while to write down the proof of this re lation in order to have an alternative deduction of the relation we have found f orhi. Observe that using the identity/summationtext2N i=1P0∆Vi= 0 we can write/summationtext2N i=1Pi∆Viin the following way 2N/summationdisplay i=1Pi∆Vi= ∆PN/summationdisplay i=1i∆V(ti) + ∆PN/summationdisplay l=1(N−l)∆V(tN+l) (19) And from ∆ V(tj) = V(tj)−V(tj−1) and the identity/summationtextN−1 i=0V(ti) =/summationtextN−1 l=0V(tN−l−1) we have 2N/summationdisplay i=1Pi∆Vi= ∆PN−1/summationdisplay l=0(V(tN+l)−V(tN−l−1)) (20) Now recalling that ∆P=1 zP0=1 zz g cm2g=m Sg we can conclude that 2N/summationdisplay i=1Pi∆Vi=m SgN−1/summationdisplay l=0[V(tN+l)−V(tN−l−1)] =mgN−1/summationdisplay l=0hN−l=mgN/summationdisplay i=1hi(21) with hN−l=1 S[V(tN+l)−V(tN−l−1)] (22) This relation together with the equality (18) can give prope rty (8) in an alternative way. 5 Eﬃciency of the Engine The heat quantity Qathat the engine adsorbs in the n3steps performed in thermal contact with the heat reservoir at TBis given by Qa=n3/summationdisplay i=1P(tN+i)∆V(tN+i) (23) The eﬃciency of the engine is therefore given by η=/summationtext2N i=1Pi∆Vi/summationtextn3 i=1P(tN+i)∆V(tN+i)(24) 14As is well known, the adiabatic works in the Carnot-cycle can cel each other, therefore η= 1 +/summationtextn1 i=1P(ti)∆V(ti)/summationtextn3 i=1P(tN+i)∆V(tN+i)(25) of course n1/summationdisplay i=1P(ti)∆V(ti) =Q0 where Q0is the heat delivered at the heat reservoir T0.From relation (29) in the Appendix we know that in the isothermal compression−∆V V(ti)=∆P P(ti−1),therefore Q0=n1/summationdisplay i=1P(ti)V(ti)/bracketleftbigg∆V(ti) V(ti)/bracketrightbigg =−RT0n1/summationdisplay i=1∆P P(ti−1)=−RT0n1/summationdisplay i=11 z+i−1(26) The sum is n1/summationdisplay i=11 z+i−1=∂ ∂z[ln(z−1 +n1)!−ln(z−1)!] = Ψ( z−1 +n1)−Ψ(z−1) where Ψ( z) is usually called the ‘digamma function’, i. e. the logarit mic derivative of the Γ( z) function. ForQawe can similarly write Qa=n3/summationdisplay i=1P(tN+i)∆V(tN+i) =RTBn3/summationdisplay i=11 z+N−n3−1 +i−1(27) from which the eﬃciency is η= 1−T0 TBf(z, n1, n3, N) (28) where f(z, n1, n3, N) =Ψ(z−1 +n1)−Ψ(z−1) Ψ(z−1 +N−1)−Ψ(z−1 +N−n3−1) in our example ( z= 1033 , n1= 410 , n3= 467 , N= 610) η= 1−T0 TB(1 +ǫ) withǫ= 1.2 10−3.We can therefore conclude that the eﬃciency of our step-wise ideal engine is smaller that of the corresponding reversibl e Carnot engine. A result which was expected since the “Dissipated Work” WD(see Appendix) is positive WD=2N/summationdisplay i=1T(ti)∆SU(ti)>0 Obviously it is also expected that for ∆ P−>0 (i.e. N−>∞)η= 1−T0 TB 156 Conclusions The detailed analysis of the classical Carnot cycle we have f ollowed here shows a fruitful complexity in the behaviour of small driving weig hts, whose energetic gain can stimulate further speculations. A deeper insight i n the cycle can be obtained trough the time-dependent raisings hN−r(ti),for instance it would be interesting to study the eﬀect, on the individual raising hN−r(ti),of the fact that the adiabatic works in the Carnot-cycle for an ideal gas canc el each other. The estimate of the Eﬃciency and of the Dissipated Work in our ste p-wise cycle may be useful to give a deeper insight on the relation among them. In particular we plan to show in a forthcoming paper that the eﬃciency of an a rbitrary non reversible engine running between TminandTmax,ηIrre(Tmin, Tmax),is equal to the eﬃciency of a suitable step-wise ideal gas Carnot engine ηstep(Tmin, Tmax,∆P).All these are conceptual aspects. It would moreover be useful to have some practical realization of the actual step-wise Carnot engine since the pattern of the overall raising of the dw′swould be preserved in spite of the energy loss due to the friction between the piston and the vessel. A Entropic changes for Isothermal and Adiabatic Processes of the step-wise Carnot- cycle 1) Isothermal processes For each time-step tiwe have P(ti)V(ti) = RT, T being the constant temperature at which the process is performed To evaluate ∆ SU(ti) = ∆Ssys(ti) + ∆Senv(ti) we ﬁrst observe that : ∆U= 0⇒∆Q= ∆W=P∆V=P(ti)[V(ti)−V(ti−1)] and V(ti−1)−V(ti) V(ti)=P(ti)−P(ti−1) P(ti−1)=⇒−∆V V=∆P P. (29) Note that during the expansion V(ti−1)−V(ti)>0 whereas during the compression V(ti−1)−V(ti)<0, so in the following we will use \|∆V\|,when necessary. So 16∆Ssys(ti) =Ssys(ti)− Ssys(ti−1) =/integraldisplayti ti−1δQ T=/integraldisplayti ti−1PdV T= =RlnV(ti) V(ti−1)=Rln/parenleftbigg 1−V(ti−1)−V(ti) V(ti−1)/parenrightbigg ∼= ∼=R/bracketleftBigg/parenleftbigg −V(ti−1)−V(ti) V(ti−1)/parenrightbigg +1 2/parenleftbiggV(ti−1)−V(ti) V(ti−1)/parenrightbigg2 +.../bracketrightBigg (30) and ∆Senv(ti) =Senv(ti)− Senv(ti−1) =∆Q T=R/parenleftbiggV(ti−1)−V(ti) V(ti)/parenrightbigg (31) Therefore to the ﬁrst order, using relations (30) and (31) we have ∆SU(ti) =R/bracketleftBigg \|∆V\|2 V(ti−1)V(ti)/bracketrightBigg ∼=R/parenleftbigg\|∆V\| V/parenrightbigg2 (32) and, using (29), the entropic gain in an isothermal step is ∆SU(ti)∼=R/parenleftbigg∆P P/parenrightbigg2 (33) 2) Adiabatic processes For the adiabatic steps a priori we cannot use P(ti)V(ti)γ=C.Nevertheless for an adiabatic compression-step, from the First Law of the rmodynamics we have ∆ U=−∆W=−P∆V=P(ti)[V(ti−1)−V(ti)]>0,but ∆ U= CV(T(ti)−T(ti−1)),so from the state equation PV=RTwe obtain CV(T(ti)−T(ti−1)) =R[P(ti) P(ti−1)T(ti−1)−T(ti)] i.e. (CV+R)T(ti) =RT(ti−1)/parenleftbiggP(ti) P(ti−1)+CV R/parenrightbigg (34) which gives T(ti) and therefore, since CP=CV+R V(ti) =RP(ti−1)V(ti−1) P(ti)CP/parenleftbiggP(ti) P(ti−1)+CV R/parenrightbigg and recalling that γ=cP/cVthis can be written V(ti) V(ti−1)=/parenleftbigg 1−1 γ/parenrightbigg +1 γP(ti−1) P(ti)= (35) = 1−1 γ/parenleftbigg 1−P(ti−1) P(ti)/parenrightbigg = 1−1 γ∆P P(ti) 17This relation is general for an ideal gas since it connects th e ﬁnal volume to the initial volume for an irreversible adiabatic compressi on in which the external pressure is suddenly increased. It follows also that ∆V(ti) V(ti−1)=−1 γ∆P P(ti)i.e.∆V V∼=−1 γ∆P P(36) It is worth-while to observe that relation (35) coincides wi th the ﬁrst term of the expansion V(ti) V(ti−1)=/parenleftbiggP(ti−1) P(ti)/parenrightbigg1 γ=/parenleftbigg 1−P(ti)−P(ti−1 P(ti)/parenrightbigg1 γ= = 1−/parenleftbigg∆P P(ti)/parenrightbigg1 γ+1 2!1 γ/parenleftbigg1 γ−1/parenrightbigg/parenleftbigg∆P P(ti)/parenrightbigg2 + +1 3!1 γ/parenleftbigg1 γ−1/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg1 γ−2/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg∆P P(ti)/parenrightbigg3 +.... so for small ∆ Psteps we can evaluate ∆ Vfrom P(ti)V(ti)γ=C. To evaluate ∆ SUfor an adiabatic step we need only ∆ Ssys.From the First Law we have ∆Ssys(ti) =Ssys(ti)− Ssys(ti−1) =/integraldisplayti ti−1δQ T=/integraldisplayti ti−1CVdT T+/integraldisplayti ti−1PdV T= (37) =CVlnT(ti) T(ti−1)+RlnV(ti) V(ti−1) which to the ﬁrst order gives ∆Ssys(ti) =CVT(ti)−T(ti−1) T(ti−1)+R/parenleftbigg −V(ti−1)−V(ti) V(ti−1)/parenrightbigg (38) now, recalling that ∆T=−∆T(ti) =−P(ti) CV∆V(ti) we have ∆Ssys(ti) =−P(ti)V(ti)−V(ti−1) T(ti−1)+R/parenleftbigg −V(ti−1)−V(ti) V(ti−1)/parenrightbigg = =−P(ti) P(ti−1)R∆V V(ti−1)+R∆V V(ti−1)=R∆V V(ti−1)/parenleftbigg 1−P(ti) P(ti−1)/parenrightbigg = =R∆V V(ti−1)/parenleftbiggγ∆V V(ti−1) +γ∆V/parenrightbigg ∼=Rγ/parenleftbigg∆V V/parenrightbigg2 =R γ/parenleftbigg∆P P/parenrightbigg2 (39) 18In the adiabatic expansion ∆ P <0 and ∆ V >0,but these changes do not alter the value of the entropic gain we have found in the compressio n. From relations (33) and (39) we can conclude that in the step- wise Carnot cycle /contintegraldisplay dSU≃∆P P(40) Since for each process the number of steps is N∼=P ∆P,and for each step ∆SU(ti)∼(∆P/P)2. The above estimate of ∆ SU(ti) enables to write down in explicit form the “Dissipated Work” WD: WD=2N/summationdisplay i=1T(ti)∆SU(ti) =n1/summationdisplay i=1T0R/parenleftbigg∆P P(ti)/parenrightbigg2 +n2/summationdisplay i=1T(tn1+i)R γ/parenleftbigg∆P P(tn1+i)/parenrightbigg2 + +n3/summationdisplay i=1TBR/parenleftbigg∆P P(tN+i)/parenrightbigg2 +n4/summationdisplay i=1T(tN+n3+i)R γ/parenleftbigg∆P P(tN+n3+i)/parenrightbigg . References [1] To perform a true reversible process an inﬁnity of steps a re needed. Here we consider a ﬁnite number of steps. As it is show in Appendix, in creasing the steps number we approximate better a reversible cycle. [2] E. Mach, ”Prinzipien der Warmelehre”-Leipzig (1896) [3] A. Sommerfeld, ”Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechan ics”-Lectures on Theoretical Physics- Vol. V. Academic Press (1964) [4] P. M. Morse,” Thermal Physics”- Benjamin (1964) [5] M.W. Zemansky, ”Heat and Thermodynamics” MacGraw-Hill (1957) [6] G. Trautteur (personal communication) pointed out that these words remind those of Simone Weil in ”Reﬂexions ` a propos de la th` eorie de s quanta” Les Cahiers du Sud, no251,(sign` e Emile Novis)(1942), in ’Sur la Science’- Gallimard (1966) [7] It will be available at the following address http://physicsweb.org/TIPTOP/VLAB/ 19This figure "FIGURONE1-copia.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0006073v1This figure "fig2.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0006073v1This figure "fig3.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0006073v1This figure "fig4.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0006073v1This figure "fig5.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0006073v1This figure "fig6.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0006073v1This figure "fig7.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0006073v1This figure "fig8.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0006073v1
arXiv:physics/0006074v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 28 Jun 2000Charging kinetics of dust particles with a variable mass S.A.Trigger Institute for High Temperatures RAS, Izhorskaya 13/19, 127 412 Moscow, Russia Keywords : Kinetics, Dusty Plasmas, Charging, Mass Variable. Abstarct A kinetic equation for dust particles with a new kinetic vari able - the mass of grains - is suggested for the description of processes with changing ma ss in dusty plasmas and neutral systems. I. Introduction The kinetic theory of dusty plasmas, which takes into accoun t speciﬁc processes of charging, has been considered in many papers, but usually not from ﬁrst principles. In [1] the dust charge was introduced as a new dynamic variable for the kinetic equa tion, in [2,3] collision integrals for dusty plasmas with charging have been formulated and used fo r several applications. The form of the charging collision integrals suggested in [2,3] has b een recently rigorously justiﬁed in [4,5], where also the stationary velocity and charge distribution s for dusty plasmas were established. In this report we consider the generalized kinetic equation in which a new dynamic variable - the mass of dust particles - is introduced in parallel with th e charge variable. We will show that for models of dusty plasmas with absorption of ions and e lectrons the distribution func- tion of grains and the average kinetic energy are determined not only by momentum transfer from light plasma particles to dust particles, but essentia lly (on the same time scale) also by mass transfer. This statement also agrees with the prelimin ary results of MD simulations of the heating of dust particles in plasma [6]. A simpliﬁed form of the obtained kinetic equation (the nonstationary variant of the Fokker-Planck equation w ith changing mass) is also found and the simplest concrete applications are considered. For some more complicated situations with surface chemical reactions between electrons and ions absorbed by dust particles, when atoms appear and can return from the dust to plasma, the proce sses of mass transfer can also be essential. It is necessary to emphasize that the formulat ed equation can be important for diﬀerent applications not only for plasmas, but for other sy stems with mesoscopic particles, where processes with mass transfer take place. II. Kinetic equation for dust particles with mass and charge variables Let us introduce the generalized kinetic equation in which a new dynamic variable M- the mass of dust particles is included in parallel with the charg eQ: dfD(t) dt=JD(/vector p,/vector r, t, Q, M ) +Jc D, (1) where the collision integral Jc Ddescribes all collision processes without change of number of small particles (e.g. electrons and ions in plasmas) and wit hout change of mass and charge ofgrains. The collision integral JDdescribes the absorption of mass and charge by dust particle s. For the simple model of absorption of electrons and ions with masses mαand charges eαby a grain with charge Qwe can write: JD=/summationdisplay α=(e,i)/integraldisplay d/vector pfα(/vector p,/vector r, t)(ωα(/vector p,/vectorP−/vector p, Q−eα, M−mα)fD(/vectorP−/vector p,/vector r, t, Q −eα, M−mα) −ωα(/vector p,/vectorP, Q, M )fD(/vectorP,/vector r, t, Q, M )). (2) where ωα(/vector p,/vectorP, Q, M ) =υσα(υ, Q, M ) is the probability density of absorption of an electron or ion with momentum /vector pand charge eαby a grain with momentum /vectorPand charge Q. This collision integral implies that the processes of mass trans fer from grains back to the plasma are absent. If there are such type of processes the more complica ted equations can be written to take into account the mass balance in plasmas correctly. The simplest approximation for the cross-section of absorption σαcan be chosen in the usual form (see e.g. [3]). In general the cross-section can be some function of the mass of grains (for example due to the dependence of the grain’s radius on mass). In general the necessity to in clude the mass as a new kinetic variable depends, naturally, on the time scale, under consi deration. To simplify the problem we have to expand the collision integrals using the small param etersmα Mandeα Q. We also suggest here that P≫p. Then we can ﬁnd the generalized Fokker-Planck equation for grains, which will be nonstationary in our case, due in particular to mass a bsorption. In this paper we will realize this expansion for a neutral system: neutral grains in system of small neutral particles. Simpliﬁcation of Eq.1 and Eq.2 for plasmas is similar and wil l be published separately. III. Kinetics of neutral grains due to mass absorption colli sions For neutral homogeneous systems we can rewrite Eq.2 in the fo rm JD(P, M, t ) =/integraldisplay d/vector pfn(/vector p, t)(w(/vector p,/vectorP−/vector p, M−m)fD(/vectorP−/vector p, M−m, t) −w(p, P, M )fD(P, M, t )). (3) Herew(p, P, M ) =σ(M)\|/vectorP M−/vector p m\|. After expansion up to ﬁrst order inmα Mand up to second order inp Pwe ﬁnd the kinetic equation for grains: ∂fD ∂t=jǫσ(M) 3∆PfD(P, M, t ) +j0mσ(M) 3M∂ ∂Pα[PαfD(P, M, t )] −j0m∂ ∂M[σ(M)fD(P, M, t )], (4) where: j0=/integraldisplay d/vector pp mfn(p, t), j ǫ=/integraldisplay d/vector pp3 2mfn(p, t). (5) Below we will suggest that fn(p, t) =fn(p) is stationary Maxwell distribution for small particles with temperature T0and density n0. Then we ﬁnd: j0=4n0T1/2 0√ 2πm, j ǫ= 2mT0j0. (6) Let us consider some average functions: density nD, mass of grain < M > and Uab(λ) =<pa λMb>, where we deﬁne the averaging asnD=1 M0/integraldisplay d/vectorPdMf D(P, M, t ), < A > =1 nDM0/integraldisplay d/vectorPdMf D(P, M, t )A . (7) Then we ﬁnd: dnD dt= 0,d < M > dt=j0 nD/integraldisplay d/vectorPdMσ (M)fD(P, M, t )>0, (8) dUab(λ) dt=−mj0(a+ 3b) 3M0nD/integraldisplay d/vectorPdMPa λMb+1σ(M)fD(P, M, t ) +jǫa(a+ 1) 3M0nD/integraldisplay d/vectorPdMP(a−2) λMbσ(M)fD(P, M, t ). (9) The question arises whether stationary averages in the limi tt→ ∞ are possible. For example for the average kinetic energy of grains E(t) =U21(2) we ﬁnd, as follows from Eq.9, the stationary solution in the limit t→ ∞ in the case σ(M)∼M(σ≡σ′ 0M): lim t→∞< E(t)>=6 5T0. (10) We emphasize that if we formally omit the last term in Eq.4, de scribing change of the mass M, the stationary Maxwell distribution function for grains w ith the temperature TD= 2T0can be immediately found. This result coincides with the soluti on obtained in [4] for the limit of uncharged particles. Really the omitted term is of the same o rder as other terms in Eq.4, as shown above. Nevertheless the physical results and predict ions obtained in [4] can be realized if the physical process of transfer of atoms from the surface of dust particles to the plasma take a place and is included in the kinetic theory. In this cas e the mass of dust particles can be ﬁxed due to this process. A more detailed analysis of the pr oblem of stationary averages in the limit t→ ∞ for neutral systems and dusty plasmas in parallel with the co nsideration of the nonstationary solutions of Eq.4 for diﬀerent cases, i n particular, of such as (for the case σ(M) =const): fD(P, M, t ) =ϕ(t−M mj0σ)χ(P, M) (11) and some others, including the solutions of generalized Fok ker-Planck equation for dusty plas- mas, will be presented separately. Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Drs. E.A.Allahyarov, W.Ebeli ng, A.M.Ignatov, G.M.W.Kroesen, S.A.Maiorov, P.P.J.M.Schram and A.G.Zago rodny for useful discussions on the kinetics of dusty plasmas. References [1] V.N.Tsytovich, O.Havnes, Comments Plasma Phys. Contro l Fusion 15 (1995), p.267. [2] A.M.Ignatov, J.Physique IV, C4 (1997), p.215. [3] S.A.Trigger, P.P.J.M.Schram, J.Phys. D: Applied Phys. 32 (1999), p.234. [4] A.G.Zagorodny, P.P.J.M. Schram, S.A.Trigger, Phys.Re v.Lett. 84 (2000), p.3594. [5] P.P.J.M. Schram, A.G.Sitenko, S.A.Trigger, A.G. Zagor odny, Phys.Rev.E (to be published). [6] A.M.Ignatov, S.A.Maiorov, P.P.J.M.Schram, S.A.Trigg er, Short Communications in Physics, in print (Lebedev Physical Institute, in Russian) (2000). S.A.Trigger, email: strig@gmx.net
arXiv:physics/0006075v1 [physics.class-ph] 29 Jun 2000A mechanical model that exhibits a gravitational critical radius Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princet on, NJ 08544 (Dec. 2, 1998) 1 Problem A popular model at science museums (and also a science toy [1] ) that illustrates how curva- ture can be associated with gravity consists of a surface of r evolution r=−k/zwithz <0 about a vertical axis z. The curvature of the surface, combined with the vertical fo rce of Earth’s gravity, leads to an inward horizontal acceleratio n ofkg/r2for a particle that slides freely on the surface in a circular, horizontal orbit. Consider the motion of a particle that slides freely on an arb itrary surface of revolution, r=r(z)≥0, deﬁned by a continuous and diﬀerentiable function on some interval of z. The surface may have a nonzero minimum radius Rat which the slope dr/dz is inﬁnite. Discuss the character of oscillations of the particle about circula r orbits to deduce a condition that there be a critical radius rcrit> R, below which the orbits are unstable. That is, the motion of a particle with r < r critrapidly leads to excursions to the minimum radius R, after which the particle falls oﬀ the surface. Give one or more examples of analytic functions r(z) that exhibit a critical radius as deﬁned above. These examples provide a mechanical analogy a s to how departures of gravi- tational curvature from that associated with a 1 /r2force can lead to a characteristic radius inside which all motion tends toward a singularity. 2 Solution We work in a cylindrical coordinate system ( r, θ, z) with the zaxis vertical. It suﬃces to consider a particle of unit mass. In the absence of friction, there is no torque on a particle ab out the zaxis, so the angular momentum component J=r2˙θabout that axis is a constant of the motion, where ˙ indicates diﬀerentiation with respect to time. For motion on a surface of revolution r=r(z), we have ˙ r=r′˙z, where′indicates diﬀerentiation with respect to z. Hence, the kinetic energy can be written T=1 2(˙r2+r2˙θ2+ ˙z2) =1 2[ ˙z2(1 +r′2) +r2˙θ2]. (1) The potential energy is V=gz. Using Lagrange’s method, the equation of motion associate d with the zcoordinate is ¨z(1 +r′2) + ˙z2rr′′=−g+Jr′ r3. (2) For a circular orbit at radius r0, we have r3 0=J2r′ 0 g. (3) 1We write ˙θ0= Ω, so that J=r2 0Ω. For a perturbation about this orbit of the form z=z0+ǫsinωt, (4) we have, to order ǫ, r(z)≈r(z0) +r′(z0)(z−z0) =r0+ǫr′ 0sinωt, (5) r′≈r′ 0+ǫr′′ 0sinωt, (6) 1 r3≈1 r3 0/parenleftBigg 1−3ǫsinωtr′ 0 r0/parenrightBigg . (7) Inserting (4-7) into (2) and keeping terms only to order ǫ, we obtain −ǫω2sinωt(1 +r′2 0)≈ −g+J2 r3 0/parenleftBigg r′ 0−3ǫsinωtr′2 0 r0+ǫsinωt r′′ 0/parenrightBigg . (8) From the zeroeth-order terms we recover (3), and from the ord er-ǫterms we ﬁnd that ω2= Ω23r′2 0−r0r′′ 0 1 +r′2 0. (9) The orbit is unstable when ω2<0,i.e., when r0r′′ 0>3r′2 0. (10) This condition has the interesting geometrical interpreta tion (noted by a referee) that the orbit is unstable wherever (1/r2)′′<0, (11) i.e., where the function 1 /r2is concave inwards. For example, if r=−k/z, then 1 /r2=z2/k2is concave outwards, ω2=J2/(k2+r4 0), and there is no regime of instability. We give three examples of surfaces of revolution that satisf y condition (11). First, the hyperboloid of revolution deﬁned by r2−z2=R2, (12) where Ris a constant. Here, r′ 0=z0/r0,r′′ 0=R2/r3 0, and ω2= Ω23z2 0−R2 2z2 0+R2= Ω23r2 0−4R2 2r2 0−R2. (13) The orbits are unstable for z0<√ 3R, (14) or equivalently, for r0<2√ 3 3R= 1.1547R≡rcrit. (15) 2Asr0approaches R, the instability growth time approaches an orbital period. Another example is the Gaussian surface of revolution, r2=R2ez2, (16) which has a minimum radius R, and a critical radius rcrit=R4√e= 1.28R. Our ﬁnal example is the surface r=−k z√ 1−z2,(−1< z < 0), (17) which has a minimum radius of R= 2k, approaches the surface r=−k/zat large r(small z), and has a critical radius of rcrit= 6k/√ 5 = 1.34R. These examples arise in a 2 + 1 geometry with curved space but ﬂ at time. As such, they are not fully analagous to black holes in 3 + 1 geometry with bo th curved space and curved time. Still, they provide a glimpse as to how a particle in cur ved spacetime can undergo considerably more complex motion than in ﬂat spacetime. 3 Acknowledgement The author wishes to thank Ori Ganor and Vipul Periwal for dis cussions of this problem. 4 References [1] The Vortx(tm) Miniature Wishing Well, Divnick Internat ional, Inc., 321 S. Alexander Road, Miamisburg, OH 45342, http://www.divnick.com/ 3
arXiv:physics/0006076v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 29 Jun 2000Radiometric force in dusty plasmas A.M.Ignatov, Sh.G.Amiranashvili General Physics Institute, Moscow 117 942 Abstract A radiofrequency glow discharge plasma, which is polluted w ith a cer- tain number of dusty grains, is studied. In addition to vario us dusty plasma phenomena, several speciﬁc colloidal eﬀects should be considered. We focus on radiometric forces, which are caused by inhomoge neous tem- perature distribution. Aside from thermophoresis, the rol e of temperature distribution in dusty plasmas is an open question. It is show n that inho- mogeneous heating of the grain by ion ﬂows results in a new pho tophoresis like force, which is speciﬁc for dusty discharges. This radi ometric force can be observable under conditions of recent microgravity e xperiments. PACS number(s): 52.25.Vy, 52.25.Ya, 52.90.+z, 82.70.Dd Numerous industrial applications, such as material procee ding, has trig- gered active research on the phenomena associated with dust dynamics in a low-pressure glow discharge. A dusty plasma [1, 2] is formed by introducing micron-sized grains in a plasma. The grains are negatively c harged due to the higher mobility of electrons with respect to ions. Then the m edium is composed of particles with ﬁxed charge (electrons and ions) and varia ble charge (dust grains). Typically, the microspheres can be easily charged to 104−105elec- tron charges. In a low-temperature radiofrequency dischar ge the grains usually remain electrically suspended in the sheath above the elect rodes [3]. Here the gravity is exactly balanced by the electric force. The grain s form ordered lattice structures, known as Coulomb crystals. The plasma boundary near the electrodes is characterized by highly non- equilibrium conditions. In particular, the grains undergo a supersonic (Bohm criterion) ion ﬂow, resulting both in an ion drag force and sp eciﬁc attractive forces between the grains [4]. The neutral gas causes an impo rtant additional class of forces, which are related to the density and tempera ture gradients. Aside from thermophoresis [5, 6] the role of such forces is an open q uestion. In this rapid communication we focus on a radiometric forces. We fou nd that ion ﬂows result in inhomogeneous temperature distribution of the gr ain surface. Then the interaction with the neutral gas results in a force simil ar to photophoresis [7], but it is provided by a plasma recombination at the grain surface. LetQdenote the energy released in each act of ion recombination. Typically, the value of Qis of the order of ten eV. We assume that this energy is absorbe d by the grain and results in the heating of its surface. Recall that the ion ﬂow in the sheath near the electrodes is strongly non-isotropic . The widely spread approximation is that zero-temperature ions move towards t he electrode with the same supersonic velocity Mcs, where M >1 is Mach number, and csis the 1ion sound velocity. Then the energy ﬂux per a unit square of th e grain surface oriented normally to ion velocity, can be estimated as J0=αniMcsQ, (1) where niis the ion number density and dimensionless factor αtakes into account the attraction of ions with the negatively charged microsph ere. This will increase the resulting ion ﬂux. Typically α≈2. The steady energy ﬂux aﬀects only one side of the grain result ing in some inhomogeneous heating. The stationary temperature distri bution inside the grain can be evaluated by means of the the Fourier’s equation div/bracketleftbigg κgradT(r)/bracketrightbigg = 0, (2) where κis the grain thermal conductivity. Eq.(2) should be supplem ented with a boundary condition. We characterize the grain surface by a unit vector n directed outwards. The boundary condition reads Js=κ/parenleftbigg∂T ∂n/parenrightbigg s+σ(Ts−T0), (3) where the subscribe srecalls that this equation is applied to the grain’s surface only. The function Jsis an external energy ﬂow onto the grain, which is caused by the recombination. The ﬁrst term in the right-hand side of Eq.(3) represents the energy ﬂow in the interior of the grain. We emphasize that the the grain permanently interacts with the neutral gas, which is assume d to be uniform, with some temperature T0diﬀering from the grain’s surface temperature Ts. The interaction results in heat transfer, which is describe d by the second term in the right-hand side of Eq.(3). The rate of this natural coo ling is characterized by the factor σ. For a microsphere suspended above the electrode the externa l energy ﬂow is taken in the form Js=/braceleftbigg−J0nfor top half, 0 for bottom half.(4) Eqs. (2-4) provide a complete description of the temperatur e distribution inside the gain. For a uniform spherical grain they are readi ly solvable in terms of Legendre polynomials. To proceed it is necessary to specify the collision of the neu tral molecule with a grain surface. We undertake the assumption of complete ene rgy accomodation. Typically the size of a grain is small, as compared to the mean free path of the neutral molecule. Then the particle distribution in the vic inity of the grain can be taken as a combination of two Maxwell functions: f(r,v) =/braceleftbigg fM(T0) for nv<0, fM(Ts) for nv>0.(5) 2In should be noted that the number density of the neutral part icles moving towards and outwards the grain ( n0andnsrespectfully) is diﬀerent n0√ T0= ns√ Tsin according to the conservation of the particle ﬂux. Using E q.(5) one obtains σ=n0/radicalbigg 2T0 πm, as well as the neutral gas pressure P=1 2n0/radicalbig T0(/radicalbig T0+/radicalbig Ts), where n0is identical to the number density of the neutral gas. Note, that the pressure depends on the local surface tempera ture. Due to the inhomogeneous temperature distribution the interacti on with the neutral gas results in a force expressed as the integral F=/integraldisplay/integraldisplay (−Pn)dS over the grain surface. In a case of a uniform spherical particle the integration can be carried out analytically. The cumbersome ﬁnal expression simpliﬁes gr eatly in the ultimate case of Ts−T0≪T0, which is the only of interest here. The resulting force takes the form F=πR2n0J0 6/parenleftbigg σ+κ R/parenrightbigg, (6) where Ris a radius of a microsphere. Eq.(6) closely resembles the known relation for the photoph oresis force [7, 8]. The diﬀerence is due the diﬀerent physical meaning of the ter mJ0. In the case of the photophoresis the inhomogeneous heating is a result o f external radiation. In a dusty plasma the force results from the ion recombinatio n. In some experiments [9] the dusty specie is formed by relativ ely big coreless grains. Let the inner radius of that hollow microsphere be ǫRwith constant ǫ <1. Assuming that the energy ﬂux through the inner surface is n egligibly small one can easily obtain the following more general expre ssion F=1 6πR2n0J0 σ(1 +1 2ǫ3) +κ R(1−ǫ3). (7) For typical conditions of dust dynamics the ﬁrst term in the d enominator of Eq.(7) is small as compared to the second term. Then F=πR3n0J0 6κ(1−ǫ3). (8) 3The ratio of this radiometric force to gravity is independen t of the radius of the grain. Generally, it is extremely small. Let us compar e the radiometric force with the ion-drag force, which is believed to play an im portant role under conditions of recent microgravity experiments with dusty p lasmas [10]. The ion-drag force is estimated as Fdrag=απR2nimi(Mcs)2, where the physical meaning of factor αis identical with that in Eq.(1). Hence F Fdrag=Rn0Q 6κmiMcs(1−ǫ3). Typically M≈1, electron temperature Te= 2.5 eV, Q= 15.8 eV (Argon), andκ≈10−2Wt/cm ·grad (glasses). We take n0= 1016cm−3, and 1 −ǫ3= 1/30. Then F/Fdrag= 1 if R= 10−2cm. The eﬀect therefore should be observable for relatively large hollow dusty grains under m icrogravity conditions. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was performed under the ﬁnancial support granted b y the NWO foun- dation. We also acknowledge the support from Integration fo undation, project #A0029. References [1] V. E. Fortov, A. P. Nefedov, O. F. Petrov, A. A. Samarian, a nd A. V. Chernyschev, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2236 (1996). [2] V. N. Tsytovitch, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 167, 57 (1997). [3] J. H. Chi and I. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4009 (1994). [4] S. V. Vladimirov and M. Nambu, Phys. Rev. E 52, R2172 (1994). [5] O. Havnes, T. Nitter, V. Tsytovich, G. E. Morﬁll, and T. Ha rquist, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 3, 448 (1994). [6] J. Perrin, P. Molinas-Mata, and Ph. Belenguer, J. Phys. D : Appl. Phys. 27, 2499 (1994). [7] O. Preining, Photophoresis in Aerosol Science , Academic Press, New York, 1966. [8] G. M. Hidy and J. R. Brock, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 455 (1967). [9] C. Arnas, M. Mikikian, and F. Doveil, Phys. Rev. E. 60, 7420 (1999). [10] G. E. Morﬁll, H. M. Thomas, U. Konopka, H. Rothermel, M. Z uzic, A. Ivlev, and J. Goree, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1598 (1999). 4
arXiv:physics/0006077v1 [physics.acc-ph] 29 Jun 2000SLAC–PUB–8481 June2000 UpgradeofthePEP-IILowBetaOptics1 Y. Nosochkov,M.Biagini, Y.Cai, F.-J. Decker, M.H.R. Donal d,S. Ecklund A. Fisher, W.Kozanecki, P. Krejcik,A. Kulikov,M.Minty,I. Reichel J. Seeman, M.Sullivan,U. Wienands,Y. Yan Stanford LinearAcceleratorCenter, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 Abstract The successful commissioning and operation of the PEP-II as ymmetric e+e−collider moti- vated further studies to increase luminosity. In this paper , we discuss a modiﬁcation of the PEP-II lattice to reduce the vertical beta function at the In teraction Point (IP) from the de- sign value of β∗ y= 1.5cmto1.0cm. This could potentially reduce the colliding beam size, increase the particle density at IP and the probability of be am-beam interactions. In this pa- per, weoutlinetheopticsmodiﬁcations,discusstrackings imulations,and overviewmachine implementation. Presented atthe7thEuropeanParticleAcceleratorConfere nce (EPAC2000) Vienna,Austria,June26–30,2000 1WorksupportedbyDepartmentofEnergycontractDE–AC03–76 SF00515.UPGRADE OF THEPEP-IILOW BETAOPTICS† Y. Nosochkov,M. Biagini,Y.Cai, F.-J. Decker,M.H.R.Donal d,S. Ecklund,A.Fisher,W. Kozanecki P.Krejcik,A.Kulikov,M.Minty,I. Reichel,J. Seeman,M.Su llivan,U. Wienands,Y. Yan,SLAC, CA 94309,USA Abstract The successful commissioning and operation of the PEP- II asymmetric e+e−collider motivated further studies to increase luminosity. In this paper, we discuss a modiﬁca- tion of the PEP-II lattice to reduce the vertical beta func- tion at the Interaction Point (IP) from the design value of β∗ y= 1.5cmto1.0cm. This could potentially reduce the colliding beam size, increase the particle density at IP and the probability of beam-beam interactions. In this paper, we outlinethe opticsmodiﬁcations,discusstrackingsimu- lations,andoverviewmachineimplementation. 1 INTRODUCTION TheluminosityofthePEP-IIasymmetric e+e−collider[1] has been steadily increased since the beams were ﬁrst brought into collision in July 1998. The present record luminosity is 2.2·1033cm−2s−1which is 73% of the de- sign value. The luminosity is currently limited by the to- tal beam current which is below design value due to vac- uumchamberheatingproblemsnearIPintheHighEnergy Ring (HER) and electron cloud instability in the Low En- ergy Ring (LER). While it may take some time before all designbeamparametersareachieved,otheroptionscanbe exploredto increase the luminosity. Speciﬁcally, the vert i- calβ∗ yfunctionat theIP couldbereducedbelowitsdesign and operating value of 1.5cm. With preservedbeam emit- tance, this would result in a smaller colliding beam size, increased probability of particle interactions and, hence , the luminosity. In this paper, we discuss an upgrade of the PEP-II Interaction Region (IR) [2] to reduce the β∗ yto 1cm. The potential improvement of the luminosity is up to 22.5% if the emittance and other beam parameters are notchanged,andupto50%ifverticalemittanceisreduced with the same rate as β∗ y. One limitation on the minimum β∗ yis placed by the bunch length which is currently about σl≈1cm. Reduction of β∗ ybelow this level would not be very effectivebecause the colliding area at the bunch ends (±σlfrom IP) will start to grow and offset the luminosity gainnearthe bunchcenter. 2 BETA SQUEEZE The PEP-II has been operated for more than a year with the design values of β∗ x/β∗ y= 50/1.5cm. In order to raise the luminosity, our present goal is to reduce β∗ yto 1cm, the level of the bunch length. The Interaction Re- gion has locally matched optics and local correction sys- tems[2]. OneoftherequirementsfortheIRwithlower β∗ y †Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE–AC03– 76SF00515.is to maintain locally matched optics and correction sys- tems to avoid global optics perturbations. This requires simultaneous adjustment of the following IR magnets: 1) quadrupoles; 2) local sextupoles compensating non-linear chromaticity from the ﬁnal focus doublets; 3) local skew quadrupolescompensating x-ycouplingcaused by the de- tector solenoid; and 4) local dipole correctors compensat- ingorbitfromthetilted solenoid. The theoreticallymatchedIR optics with β∗ y=1cmwas developedfortheHERandLERusingMADcode[3]. The mostnoticeableandunavoidableeffectcausedbythelower β∗ yisanenlargementof βypeakattheﬁnalfocusdoublets, proportionalto 1/β∗ y. Thehigher βypeakfurtherincreases sensitivityofthedoubletstoﬁeld,alignmentandenergyer - rors. At β∗ y=1cm, the natural vertical chromaticitygrows by24%and15%intheHERandLER,respectively,mainly due to increased contribution from the doublets. Compen- sation of doublet chromaticity was done mostly by raising the ﬁeld in the vertically correcting IR sextupoles by 37% in HER and 22% in LER. In the LER, the desired ﬁeld at these sextupoles(SCY3)couldnotbereacheddueto mag- netﬁeldlimitation,hencethe βyfunctionat theSCY3 was raised by 11%to compensate the lack of the ﬁeld. The strengths of the IR local skew quadrupoles were adjusted toaccountforthechangeinopticaltransformationbetween the solenoidandthe skewquads. Because of independent optics adjustment on the left and right side of IR, about 40 magnet families in each ring change strength to make 1cmlattice. The typi- cal quadrupole ﬁeld change is a few percent, but sev- eral quads require 10-18% change. As stated earlier, the sextupoles correcting the doublets require the most raise in magnet ﬁeld. The strength change of IR skew quadrupoles have rather large variation, though many of the quads have reduced ﬁeld. At β∗ y= 1cm, the new IR strengthsarestillwithinmagnetlimitationsexcepttheLE R SCY3sextupolesdescribedaboveandLERSK5andSK5L skew quadrupoles. In the latter case the required skew quadrupolestrength wasmade up bycreating ∼2mmver- tical orbit bumps in the SCY3 sextupoles located next to SK5 and SK5L. The B1 and QD1 magnets near IP, shared by the two beams, were not changed, therefore each ring couldbeadjustedindependently. Machine implementation and tuning of the more sensi- tive1cmopticscouldbedifﬁcultwithoutsmoothtransition from the present IR conﬁguration. For that reason, an in- termediatematchedopticswith β∗ y=1.25cmwasdesigned. Furthermore, a two step linear “low beta knob” was made to provide a continuous transition from β∗ y= 1.5cmto 1.25cm(step1)andfrom 1.25cmto1cm(step2). Ineach step, all IR variablestrengthsare linearlychangedwith β∗ y 1between two matched conﬁgurations. With this knob, the IRopticswouldnotbeexactlymatchedeverywhereexcept the above three β∗ ypoints. However, the residual optics effects for entire transition are rather small. MAD calcu- lations show that distortionsare below 0.0007for betatron tune,0.2forchromaticityand ±3%forβfunctions. There- forepotentially,theknobcouldbeusednotonlyfortransi- tion,butforoperationat transition β∗ yaswell. 3 TRACKINGSIMULATIONS At lower β∗ y, the higher sensitivity of IR doublets to er- rors and stronger sextupoles could increase the effects of betatronresonancesandlead toreduceddynamicaperture, especially in the vertical plane where most optics changes have occurred. To evaluate the impact of the new optics ondynamicaperture,weperformedtrackingsimulationsat the presentandlower β∗ yvalues,usingLEGO code[4]. To identify the nearby resonanceswhich may be affecting the beam lifetime, dynamic aperture was also scanned around machineworkingpoint. 3.1 DynamicAperture The typical tracking simulation with LEGO included: 1) an assignment of ﬁeld, multipole and alignment errors to magnets according to PEP-II speciﬁcations; 2) global cor- rectionoftune,linearchromaticity,couplingandorbit;a nd 3) tracking of particles injected at various xandyampli- tudes to determine dynamic aperture, the area of particle stable motion. The particles were tracked for 1024 turns with synchrotronoscillationsand initial relative energy er- ror of 8σδ, where σδis 0.061% in HER and 0.077% in LER. The tracking was done at the present machine tune ofνx/νy=24.569/23.639 in HER and 38.649/36.564 in LER, and the dynamic aperture was evaluated at the PEP- II injection point. The typical rms orbit observed in the PEP-II operation is on the order of 1mm. For realistic re- sults,theorbitcorrectioninthesimulationswasadjusted to providesimilar residual orbit. The linear chromaticitywa s corrected to zero for the tracking. The beam-beam effects were notincludedat thistime. Thetrackingresultsat β∗ y=1.5cm,1.25cmand1cmfor both rings are shown in Fig. 1, where the dash lines cor- respond to dynamic aperture at injection point for 10 dif- ferent machine error settings, and the solid ellipse shows forcomparisonthesize of 10σx,yfullycoupledbeamwith emittanceof ǫx=48nmandǫy=ǫx/2. Notethatnormally the circulatingbeamwith correctedcouplinghas ǫy/ǫxra- tioontheorderof3%andthe 10σysizefourtimessmaller compared to the ellipse in Fig. 1. However, it is important to maintain large vertical dynamic aperture because of the vertical injection with initial amplitude equal to ∼8σyof a fully coupled beam. The x-offset of the LER dynamic aperture in Fig. 1 is due to non-zerodispersion at the LER injectionpointand 8σδinitial energyerrorintracking. As shown in Fig. 1, the lower β∗ ycauses gradual reduc- tion of dynamic aperture. Compared to 1.5cmlattice, dy-Figure1: Dynamicaperturevs. β∗ yfor10errorsettings. namic aperture at 1cmis reduced by about 15% and 30% in the xandyplanes, respectively. The vertical aperture is more affectedsince most optics changesoccurredin the vertical plane. For instance, at lower β∗ y, particles in the vertical plane experience stronger non-linear ﬁeld in the IR doublets and IR vertically correcting sextupoles due to largeroscillationsin thedoubletsandstrongersextupole s. AccordingtoFig.1,itisexpectedthatoperationatlower β∗ ywouldrequiremorecarefulmachinetuningtominimize any effects causing large particle oscillations. It appear s that injection conditions are adequate at 1.25cm, but be- come tighter at 1cm. Note that dynamic aperture in Fig. 1 is for particles in the tail of energy distribution ( δ= 8σδ). Theparticlesin thebeamcorewill havelargeraperture. 3.2 TuneScan TheworkingpointusedinthecurrentPEP-IIoperationand inthisstudydiffersfromthedesign[1]. Itwasselectedex- perimentally in the machine operation based on maximum luminosity, while the design tune was better optimized for maximum dynamic aperture with single beam. For better understanding the tune space and effects of betatron reso- nances near present working point, dynamic aperture tune scan was performed. In this study, the betatron tune was varied in 0.0025 steps around the machine working point withintherangeof ±0.04forνxandνy,anddynamicaper- ture was calculated at each point. Due to extensive com- puting time in this study, the numberof particle launching conditionswaslimitedtoﬁve,namelywith1-2) ±x,y=0; 3)x= 0,y >0; and 4-5) x=±y,y >0initial ampli- tudes. Theminimumapertureamongthe ﬁveconditionsat each tune point was then used to determine dynamic aper- ture dependence on νxandνy. As in the previous study, machine errors were applied to the magnets, and the ini- tial particle energy error was set to 8σδwith synchrotron oscillations included. Similar to machine operations, the tune variation was done with the “tune knob” which uses pre-calculated linear dependence of quadrupole strengths in thetunesectionswiththetune. The HER and LER tune scan diagrams for β∗ y= 1cm 20.530.540.550.560.570.580.590.60.60.610.620.630.640.650.660.67 Horizontal TuneVertical Tune Figure2: HERtunescan for β∗ y= 1cm. 0.610.620.630.640.650.660.670.680.530.540.550.560.570.580.590.6 Horizontal TuneVertical Tune Figure3: LERtunescanfor β∗ y= 1cm. are shown in Fig. 2 and 3, where a smaller aperture corre- spondstoadarkershadeandthepresentworkingpointisin thecenter. Numericalanalysisofthetunescanrevealssev- eral lines of reduced dynamic aperture on the tune plane, associatedwith synchro-betatronresonances. In the HER, the strongest resonance identiﬁed near working point is 2νx+kνs= 49, where k=-1,-2,-3 and the synchrotron tune νs= 0.044. The dynamic aperture practically disappears at the ﬁrst synchrotron side band of the2νxresonance. Two otherweaker resonanceswere ob- served: 3νy= 71andνx−νy+νs= 1. According to the tunescan,theHERaperturecouldbeimprovedbymoving furtherawayfromthenearby 2νx−3νsresonance. IntheLER,thefollowingresonanceswereidentiﬁed: 1) 2νy+lνs= 73, with l=-2,-3; 2) 3νx+mνs= 116, with m=-2,-1,0,1;and 3) 2νx+νy+nνs=114, with n=1,2,3 andνs= 0.025. The ﬁrst two resonances above are the strongest and result in rather small or vanished dynamic aperture close to resonance conditions. The effect is more pronounced near the lowest order synchrotron side bands oftheresonances. Comparedto 1.5cmlattice,at β∗ y=1cm the2νy+lνsresonance is enhanced due to increased ver- tical chromaticity and sensitivity in the IR doublets, thus further limiting the available vertical tune space near the working point. According to the tune scan, the LER dy- namicaperturecouldbeimprovedbyincreasingthe νyandreducingthe νxtunesby ∼0.015,howeverthebeam-beam conditionsinthisareahavenotbeenveriﬁedyet. Note that the tune scan results are valid for one partic- ular set of machine errors and particles with δ= 8σδos- cillations. Particles with smaller energy error will be les s affectedbytheresonancesynchrotronside bands. 4 MACHINEIMPLEMENTATION The ﬁrst step of the described low beta modiﬁcation has been recently implementedin the machine, and the IR op- tics is currently set at β∗ y= 1.25cm. The transition to 1.25cmlattice was done using the “low beta multi-knob” describedearlier,with the beamsstoredin the machine. In this way, any residual distortions (tune shifts, chromatic - ity, etc.) could be compensated as they appeared in the transition, and any effect of the larger beam size in the IR quadrupoles on the backgrounds could be detected imme- diately. The spurious tune shift observed during this oper- ation was about 0.006 in xand<0.001inyplanes. The global changein the beam orbitwas ∼0.4mm,which was easily compensated with orbit correctors. Residual chro- maticityamountedto lessthanoneunitin eitherplane. Theeffectofthenew β∗ yonlatticefunctionswasveriﬁed using the on-line phase advance and βfunction measure- ment facility. Fig. 4 shows the ratio of the new HER βy functionswithrespecttotheoldvalues,measuredatBPMs (circles) near IP (at center of the ﬁgure). The agreement with theMADprediction(solidline)issatisfactory. 100 200 3000.900 1.000 1.100 1.200 ßy,1.25 /ßy,1.5 Distance (m) Figure 4: Ratio of HER βyfunctions near IP at β∗ y= 1.25cmwithrespectto βyvaluesat β∗ y=1.5cm. No increase in thebackgroundwasobservedduringand after implementingthe 1.25cmlattice. Luminositydid not visibly increase immediately after the β∗ ychange. A few days later, solenoids to reduce the effect of photoelectron s on the LER beam were poweredup. After that, luminosity increasedsigniﬁcantly,raisingtherecordfromtheprevio us valueof 1.6·1033to1.95·1033cm−2s−1. 5 REFERENCES [1] PEP-IIConceptual DesignReport, SLAC–418, 1993. [2] Y.Nosochkov etal.,“LatticeandCompensationSchemesfor the PEP-IIInteractionRegion”, ICFA’97,Frascati,1997. [3] H.Grote, F.C.Iselin,CERN/SL/90–13(AP)Rev.4, 1994. [4] Y. Cai, etal., SLAC–PUB–7642,1997. 3
arXiv:physics/0006078v1 [physics.atom-ph] 29 Jun 2000Role of Bose enhancement in photoassociation∗ Matt Mackie and Juha Javanainen Department of Physics, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-3046, USA January 17, 2014 Abstract We discuss the role of Bose enhancement of the dipole matrix e lement in photoasso- ciation, using stimulated Raman adiabatic passage as an exa mple. In a nondegenerate gas the time scale for coherent optical transients tends to i nﬁnity in the thermodynamic limit, whereas Bose enhancement keeps this time scale ﬁnite in a condensate. Coherent transients are therefore absent in photoassociation of a th ermal nondegenerate gas, but are feasible if the gas is a condensate. 1 Introduction The theoretical realization is now emerging that it may be po ssible to eﬀect analogs of coherent optical transients, such as Rabi ﬂopping [1, 2], rapid adiabatic passage [2], and stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) [3], in pho toassociation of a Bose- Einstein condensate (BEC). In contrast, the feasibility of transients in PA of a thermal nondegenerate gas has been controversial. There are predic tions of STIRAP in ordinary gases [4], whereas our results suggest otherwise [5]. ∗Paper submitted to the special issue of J. Mod. Opt. on “Semin ar on Fundamentals of Quantum Optics V”, K¨ uhtai, Austria, January 16-21, 2000 ; ed. F. Ehlotzky. 1The purpose of the present paper is to clarify the status of co herent optical tran- sients in both nondegenerate and degenerate thermal gases. Our key concept is Bose enhancement. Suppose we have a large number of atoms Nin one quantum state, as in a BEC [6]. Due to Bose-Einstein statistics, the transitio n matrix element referring to the BEC will pick up a multiplicative factor√ Nas compared to the matrix element for a single atom. It turns out that Bose enhancement will mak e a diﬀerence. In the thermodynamic limit, when the volume and particle number of a gas tend to inﬁnity while the density remains constant, coherent optical trans ients will vanish in photoas- sociation of a nondegenerate gas, but Bose enhancement will facilitate such transients in a condensate. In the rest of the present paper we outline th e details of this argument using STIRAP as our explicit example. 2 Ordinary STIRAP As a prelude to our development we brieﬂy reiterate the salie nt features of STIRAP in an ordinary three-level Λ system [7], as in Fig. 1. Two laser ﬁ elds are tuned to exact two-photon resonance between the two lower states aandgof the Λ system. First the laser intensities are arranged in such a way that the couplin g between states gandb is much stronger than the coupling between aandb. One of the dressed states of the three-level system then coincides with the bare state a. When the laser intensities are adjusted in such a way that the coupling becomes much stronge r in the transition from atob, the dressed state that initially coincided with the bare st ateaturns instead into the bare state g. Suppose now that, before the adjustment of laser intensitie s, the system started in the bare state a. It then also started in the dressed state whose fate we follo w. If the lasers were adjusted slowly enough, adiabaticity guarante es that the system stays in 2the dressed state all along. In the end, the system therefore winds up in the bare state g. Moreover, a detailed analysis shows that, in the ideal adia batic limit, there is never any population at all in the intermediate state b. In short, the intensities of the two light pulses are switche d in such a way that initially the coupling between the unoccupied states is muc h stronger than the coupling to the occupied state, and the same situation prevails when t he coupling strengths have reversed. This is called counter-intuitive pulse order. The result is that the system is transferred from the initial state ato the ﬁnal state g. Besides, ideally, the system never visits the intermediate state b, which is a major virtue if bis plagued by dissipation. 3 Quasicontinuum photoassociation In a process of photoassociation two atoms and a photon combi ne to make the corre- sponding diatomic molecule. As the two atoms may be consider ed to be a dissociated state of the molecule, photoassociation is really about fre e-bound transitions. There are internal atomic and molecular states involved in photoa ssociation as well, but we assume that, by properly choosing the laser frequency, one h as selected a transition from the initial state of the atoms to a unique rovibrational state of the molecule. Quantum optics normally deals with bound-bound transition s responsible for char- acteristic spectral lines, and with bound-free transition that manifest themselves in decay processes such as spontaneous emission. From this ang le, photoassociation is ir- reversible decay in reverse, and may seem to violate the seco nd law of thermodynamics. Nonetheless, photoassociation spectroscopy is alive and w ell, and is the source of the most accurate molecular structure data available at this ti me [8]. To model free-bound transitions, especially in a thermal sa mple, it is desirable to start with two atoms whose relative motion is in an eigenstat e of energy. Unfortunately, 3as energy eigenstates of the relative motion for unconﬁned a toms are not normalizable, there is no mathematically sound way to write down such a quan tum state. The cure is straight from textbooks of quantum mechanics: Assume tha t the relative motion is restricted to a quantization volume V, and at the end of the calculations take the limit V→ ∞. This is the stratagem of our quasicontinuum (QC) approach [5 , 9]. The dissoci- ation continuum is broken up into discrete states, a QC, wher eupon problems with the normalization of the states vanish. In an unexpected win dfall, the mathematics also turns out to work out in such a way that the experience abo ut few-level systems gained over decades of quantum optics and laser spectroscop y is directly transferable to understanding photoassociation. As it comes to the theme of the present paper, the observation of most immediate relevance is that the dipole matrix element between any free (two-atom) state and the bound (rovibrational molecular) state scales with the q uantization volume as d∼ V−1/2. There is no mystery to this. A unit-normalized dissociated state ﬁlls the entire volume V, so its square is proportional to 1 /Vand the normalization constant is∝V−1/2. On the other hand, the normalization constant of the bound s tate is independent of V. Eventually the V−1/2makes its way to the free-bound dipole matrix element. The immediate consequence is that in the limit of an inﬁnitel y large quantization volume, the dipole matrix element between the bound state an d any single QC state vanishes. Accordingly, when the volume is increased and Bos e enhancement is absent, the photoassociation coupling can always be treated with pe rturbation theory [9]. 4 Nondegenerate thermal gas 44.1 Theoretical method The main reason why we have insisted on eigenstates of energy is the basic random- phase postulate of statistical mechanics, which states tha t the thermal density operator is diagonal in eigenstates of energy. It is therefore always permissible to do whatever analysis one is aiming at by ﬁrst assuming that the system sta rts in a given eigenstate of energy m, and at the end of the calculations averaging the results ove r the thermal probability distribution of the states m. When discussing a nondegenerate thermal gas, we make anothe r assumption as well. We analyze photoassociation for just two atoms, and ca lculate the free-bound transition rate, R. However, a typical experiment involves N≫2 atoms. When thinking of photoassociation of any given ‘probe’ atom, we a dd the transition rates due to all colliders, so that the photoassociation rate per atom becomes NR. In the limit of inﬁnite quantization volume, the rate of phot oassociation for two atoms vanishes with the coupling matrix element as R∝d2∝1/V. We of course expect as much since two atoms cease to collide in an inﬁnite v olume. Nonetheless, for Natoms the photoassociation rate per atom is NR∝N/V=̺, proportional to the density of the gas. In the thermodynamic limit when both NandVtend to inﬁnity in such a way that ̺remains constant, the photoassociation rate per atom has a ﬁ nite limit proportional to density. The result is reasonable, an d our QC approach [5, 9] in fact exactly reproduces the free-bound transition rate obt ained from collision theory [8]. 4.2 The demise of STIRAP In our model, and in current practice [8], the primary photoa ssociated molecular state is reached by absorption of a photon. This invariably means t hat the molecule is subject to spontaneous emission, and decays away. Moreover , the reverse of PA, pho- 5todissociation, tends to break molecules back into atoms. I t is then a natural idea to add a second laser ﬁeld tuned between the initially photoass ociated state and another (more) stable molecular state, and to attempt to utilize STI RAP to avoid losses from the primary photoassociated state [4]. We sketch such a sche me in Fig. 2. Unfortunately, this idea hits a roadblock. According to the random-phase postulate, for a thermal sample we may assume that the system starts in a g iven QC state m, as denoted in Fig. 2. But the free-bound matrix element dscales with the quantization volume Vasd∝V−1/2, and tends to zero with V→ ∞. On the contrary, the bound- bound matrix element is volume independent. The free-bound coupling is therefore always small compared to the coupling for bound-bound transitions , and it is impossible to eﬀect the counter-intuitive reversal of the coupling str engths needed for STIRAP [5]. Of course, the ﬁnal average over a distribution of initial st atesmis not expected to create STIRAP either. We are not arguing that there would be no two-color photoassociation; see Ref. [9]. However, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, we do not believe that the advantages of counter-intuitive pulse order and STIRAP, pr otection from decay of the intermediate state and the ensuing improvement in transfer eﬃciency, will materialize in free-bound-bound photoassociation of a thermal nondege nerate gas. 5 Bose-Einstein condensate 5.1 Theoretical method Calculating the free-bound transition rate for one pair of a toms and then multiplying by the number of available colliders is a process which impli citly assumes that we can distinguish between the atoms. Such an approach is fundamen tally ﬂawed in the case of a BEC. Instead, we have adopted a phenomenological second -quantized Hamiltonian 6for photoassociation [1, 2]. Our basic premises are that one may treat atoms and molecules as bosons in their own right, and that photoassociation conserves momentum. G iven the momentum representation for atoms and molecules, annihilation oper ators akandbk, the part of the Hamiltonian responsible for photoassociation reads, H=...−1 2/summationdisplay k,p,qd(k−p)·Eqb† k+p+qakap+... . (1) HereEqis the Fourier component q/¯hof the positive frequency part of the electric ﬁeld driving photoassociation. By translational symmetry, the dipole matrix element may depend only on the diﬀerence of the momenta of the atoms, k−p, and in the dipole approximation it cannot depend on the photon momentum q. The term written down is simply a sum of processes in which two atoms with momenta k,pand a photon with momentum qare combined into a molecule with momentum k+p+q. It remains to determine the values of the dipole matrix eleme ntsdin the Hamilto- nian. We do this by demanding that for the nondegenerate ther mal gas the results from the Hamiltonian (1) be the same as we obtain from our QC approa ch. In the process a number of subtleties come up having to do, e.g. with Bose-Ein stein statistics and the Wigner threshold law for photodissociation [2, 10]. The bot tom line, though, is that we know how to deduce the matrix elements from consideration s such as the standard molecular-structure calculations, or measurements of the photodissociation rate. Consider now an ideal zero-momentum condensate photoassoc iated by a plane wave of light, where all photons have momentum q. The molecules made by photon absorp- tion all have the momentum q. The converse is not trivially true. By momentum conservation alone, the induced emission of a molecule with momentum qneed not return two atoms into the condensate; but, in a process we cal l rogue photodissocia- tion [10], the two atoms may emerge with any opposite nonzero momenta. However, the 7photodissociation processes that return the atoms back to t he condensate are favored by Bose enhancement, and rogue photodissociation is furthe r suppressed by energy conservation. Thus we adopt a two-mode model, only taking in to account atoms with zero momentum and molecules with momentum q. The corresponding creation and annihilation operators are denoted by aandb. 5.2 The return of STIRAP Turning now towards two-color photoassociation of a degene rate gas [11], we reconsider the possibility of STIRAP [3]. It is thus assumed that a furth er laser beam couples the primarily photoassociated molecule to another bound molec ular state, whose annihila- tion operator is denoted by g. The three-mode Hamiltonian reads H ¯h=−∆g†g−δb†b−1 2κ(b†aa+ba†a†)−1 2Ω(b†g+bg†). (2) Here ∆ and δare the two-photon and intermediate detunings, including t he proper photon recoil energies, the free-bound QC Rabi frequency is κ=d·E 2¯h(3) and Ω is the bound-bound Rabi frequency. Given the Hamiltonian (2), the Heisenberg equations of moti on for the boson oper- ators read ˙a=iκa†b, (4) ˙b=iδ b+1 2i(κaa+ Ωg), (5) ˙g=i∆g+1 2iΩb. (6) Suppose now that, if all molecules were dissociated to atoms , there were Natoms. The boson operators in the system are then of the order√ N. We thus introduce the 8rescaled boson operators α=a/√ N, .. .. These operators are of the order of unity, and may roughly be interpreted as the second-quantized coun terparts of the probability amplitudes that an atom is in the atomic condensate ( α) or in one of the two molecular condensates ( β,γ). The scaled operators obey the equation of motion ˙α=iχα†β , (7) ˙β=iδ β+1 2i(χαα+ Ωγ), (8) ˙γ=i∆γ+1 2iΩβ . (9) The key point of our argument emerges from an inspection of th e new Rabi fre- quency after scaling, χ=√ Nd·E 2¯h. (10) The√ Nis nothing but Bose enhancement in the present context. In th e thermody- namic limit d∝/radicalbig 1/V, so that χ∝/radicalbig N/V =√ρremains ﬁnite. More precisely, suppose that the same laser ﬁeld with amplitude Ewere tuned in such a way that the the photodissociation of bound molecules would produce two atoms with the reduced massµand relative velocity vat the rate Γ( v), then we have [2, 10] χ= lim v→0/radicalBigg 2π¯h2Γ(v)̺ µ2v. (11) The limit is ﬁnite and nonzero by virtue of the Wigner thresho ld law. The couplings χand Ω in Eqs. (7)-(9) do not depend on the quantization volume anymore; the dependence on Vis replaced by a dependence on ̺, the density of atoms if all molecules were to dissociate. In a BEC there is no longe r any intrinsic restriction on the relative size of the couplings, and photoassociative STIRAP is feasible even in the thermodynamic limit. We have constructed explicit examples of STIRAP by solving E qs. (7)-(9) in a semi- classical or mean-ﬁeld [6] approximation, treating α,βandγasc-numbers instead of 9quantum operators [3]. Unlike the equations for probabilit y amplitudes for the ordinary Λ system, these equations are nonlinear. Nonetheless, the b asic character of STIRAP remains intact. In particular, for completely adiabatic sw itching of pulse strengths (for which Ref. [3] gives quantitative criteria), there is never any probability in the primary photoassociated state. Spontaneous-emission losses and r ogue photodissociation are then shut oﬀ. We cannot think of any matter of principle that could go catas trophically wrong with STIRAP. In practical experiments the atoms and possibl y also the molecules are trapped and do not form inﬁnite homogeneous condensates. Tr apped particles come with a time scale that is of the order of tens of milliseconds i n the magnetic case. If the STIRAP pulses are faster, trapping should not matter a whole lot. We have also ignored collisions between atoms, between molecules, and between a toms and molecules. But again, the corresponding time scales could easily be much lo nger than the time scale of the laser pulses, so that collisions are also negligible. The worst practical enemy of STIRAP might be light shifts of the two-photon resonance, which come about as a result of virtual transitions accompanying rogue photodis sociation [9, 10]. However, in principle one can always compensate for light shifts by chir ping the laser pulses. 6 Ruminations Our renunciation of photoassociative STIRAP in a thermal no ndegenerate gas most likely applies to other coherent optical transients as well [9]. In the limit V→ ∞ the free-bound Rabi frequency κ∝1/√ Vtends to zero, and the corresponding time scale for the transient 1 /κtends to inﬁnity. At least in a large enough sample, somethin g else is likely to happen before a coherent transient can run i ts course. Similarly, coherent transients should work in photoassoci ation of a BEC. Because 10of Bose enhancement, the coupling matrix element picks up a t he factor√ N, giving the eﬀective Rabi frequency χ=√ Nκ∝/radicalbig N/V=√̺. In the thermodynamic limit χremains ﬁnite, and the time scale of transients actually sca les with atom density as ρ−1/2. Such transients have already been discussed in the photoas sociation literature [1, 2], and equivalent mathematics is involved in a wide variety of topics ranging from second-harmonic generation [12] to the Feshbach resonance [13]. One ﬁnal point concludes our discussion of transients in pho toassociation. Bose en- hancement oftentimes makes little practical diﬀerence eve n when it is formally present. For instance, suppose that we were to calculate a transition rate for a condensate un- der a normal bilinear coupling of the form b†a. Bose enhancement gives the factor √ Nin the matrix element, and the transition rate for the conden sate in terms of the one-atom rate Rreads NR. However, in the second quantized formulation all Ncon- densate atoms are treated at once, so that the transition rat e per atom is still R. On the other hand, the coupling for photoassociation, b†aa, is trilinear. The ensuing Bose enhancement ∝(√ N)2is thus stronger than for a bilinear coupling; in fact, just s trong enough to oﬀset the decrease of the coupling matrix element i n the thermodynamic limit. As a result of the conﬂuence of BEC and cubic coupling, a condensate responds to photoassociation as a unit on a time scale that depends on d ensity, but oddly enough not directly on atom number or size of the condensate. 7 Acknowledgements One of us (JJ) speciﬁcally thanks for Prof. Fritz Ehlotky for the opportunity to par- ticipate in the Obergurgl/K¨ uhtai meetings already for the ﬁfth time — and hopefully running.... This work is supported in part by NSF, Grant No. P HY-9801888, and by NASA, Grant No. NAG8-1428. 11References [1] Drummond, P. D., Kheruntsyan, K. V., and He, H., 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett. ,81, 3055. [2] Javanainen, J., and Mackie, M., 1999, Phys. Rev. A ,59, R3186. [3] Mackie, M., Kowalski, R., and Javanainen, J., 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett. ,84, 3803; http://arXive.org/abs/physics/9909060. [4] Vardi, A., Abrashkevich, D., Frishman, E., and Shapiro, M., 1997, J. Chem. Phys. , 107, 6166. [5] Javanainen, J., and Mackie, M., Phys. Rev. A , 1998, 58, R789. [6] Parkins, A. S., and Walls, D. F., 1998, Phys. Rep. ,303, 1. [7] Bergman, K., Theuer, H., and Shore, B. W., 1998, Rev. Mod. Phys. ,70, 1003. [8] Weiner, J., Bagnato, V. S., Zilio, S. C., and Julienne, P. S.,Rev. Mod. Phys. ,71, 1. [9] Javanainen, J., and Mackie, M., Phys. Rev. A , 1999, 60, 3174. [10] Ko˘ strun, M., Mackie, M., Cˆ ot´ e, R., and Javanainen, J ., http://arXive.org/abs/ physics/0006066. [11] Wynar, R., Freeland, R. S., Han, D. J., Ryu, C., and Heinz en, D. J., 2000, Science , 287, 1016. [12] Walls, D. F., and Barakat, R., Phys. Rev.A , 1970, 1, 446; Walls, D. F., Phys. Lett. , 1970,32A, 476; Walls, D. F., and Tindle, C. T., Lett. Nuovo Cimento , 1971, 2 915; Walls, D. F., and Tindle, C. T., J. Phys. A , 1972, 5, 534. [13] Timmermans, E., Tommasini, P., Cˆ ot´ e, R., Hussein, M. , and Kerman, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. , 1999, 83, 2691. 12ab gδ ∆κΩ Figure 1: Three-level Λ scheme with states a,bandgand laser couplings with Rabi frequencies κand Ω. The deﬁnitions of the two-photon and intermediate detunings ∆ and δare also given schematically. For STIRAP, one would have ∆ = 0. The notation also applies to the Hamilton ian (1). 13gmb d Figure 2: Scheme for STIRAP starting from the quasicontinuu m state m. The free-bound coupling is represented here by the dipole ma trix element, d. 14
arXiv:physics/0006079v1 [physics.bio-ph] 30 Jun 2000Correlation property of length sequences based on global structure of complete genome Zu-Guo Yu1,2∗, V. V. Anh1and Bin Wang3 1Centre for Statistical Science and Industrial Mathematics , Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Q 4001, Australia. 2Department of Mathematics, Xiangtan University, Hunan 411 105, P. R. China.† 3Institute of Theoretical Physics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 2735, Beijing 100080, P. R. China. Abstract This paper considers three kinds of length sequences of the c omplete genome. Detrended ﬂuctuation analysis, spectral analysis, and the mean distance spanned within time Lare used to discuss the correlation property of these sequen ces. Through comparing the appropriate exponents of the three me thods, it is found that the exponent related to the mean distance is the best sca le to characterise the correlation property of the time series. The values of the ex ponents of these three kinds of length sequences of bacteria indicate that the incr ements of the sequences are uncorrelated ( γ= 1.0±0.03). It is also found that these sequences exhibit 1/fnoise in some interval of frequency ( f >1). The length of this interval of frequency depends on the length of the sequence. The shape of the periodogram in f >1 exhibits some periodicity. The period seems to depend on th e length and the complexity of the length sequence. PACS numbers: 87.10+e, 47.53+n Key words : Coding/noncoding segments, complete genome, detrended ﬂ uctuation analysis, 1 /fnoise, spectral analysis. ∗Corresponding author, e-mail: yuzg@hotmail.com or z.yu@q ut.edu.au †This is the permanent corresponding address of Zu-Guo Yu. 11 Introduction Recently, there has been considerable interest in the ﬁndin g of long-range dependence (LRD) in DNA sequences [1 −15]. Li et al[1]found that the spectral density of a DNA sequence containing mostly introns shows 1 /fβbehaviour, which indicates the presence of LRD. The correlation properties of coding and noncoding D NA sequences were ﬁrst studied by Peng et al[2]in their fractal landscape or DNA walk model. The DNA walk deﬁned in [2] is that the walker steps “up” if a pyrimidine ( CorT) occurs at position ialong the DNA chain, while the walker steps “down” if a purine (AorG) occurs at position i. Peng et al[2]discovered that there exists LRD in noncoding DNA sequences while the coding sequences correspond to a regular random wa lk. By doing a more detailed analysis, Chatzidimitriou, Dreismann and Larhammar[5]concluded that both coding and noncoding sequences exhibit LRD. A subsequent work by Prabh u and Claverie[6]also substantially corroborates these results. If one consider s more details by distinguishing CfromTin pyrimidine, and AfromGin purine (such as two or three-dimensional DNA walk model[8]and maps given in [9]), then the presence of base correlation has been found even in coding region. Alternatively, Vose[10], based on equal-symbol correlation, showed a power law behaviour for the sequences studied regar dless of the percent of intron contents. Investigations based on diﬀerent models seem to s uggest diﬀerent results, as they all look into only a certain aspect of the entire DNA sequence . It is therefore important to investigate the degree of correlations in a model-indepe ndent way. Since the ﬁrst complete genome of the free-living bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium was sequenced in 1995[16], an ever-growing number of complete genomes has been de- posited in public databases. The availability of complete g enomes induces the possibility to ask some global questions on these sequences. The avoided and under-represented strings in some bacterial complete genomes have been discus sed in [17, 18, 19]. A time series model of CDS in complete genome has also been proposed in [20]. One may ignore the composition of the four kinds of bases in co ding and noncod- ing segments and only considers the rough structure of the co mplete genome or long DNA sequences. Provata and Almirantis[21]proposed a fractal Cantor pattern of DNA. They map coding segments to ﬁlled regions and noncoding segm ents to empty regions of random Cantor set and then calculate the fractal dimension o f the random fractal set. They found that the coding/noncoding partition in DNA seque nces of lower organisms is homogeneous-like, while in the higher eucariotes the par tition is fractal. This result seems too rough to distinguish bacteria because the fractal dimensions of bacteria they gave out are all the same. The classiﬁcation and evolution re lationship of bacteria is one of the most important problem in DNA research. Yu and Anh[22]proposed a time series model based on the global structure of the complete genome an d considered three kinds of length sequences. After calculating the correlation dim ensions and Hurst exponents, it was found that one can get more information from this model than that of fractal Cantor pattern. Some results on the classiﬁcation and evolu tion relationship of bacteria 2were found in [22]. Naturally it is desirable to know if there exists LRD in these length sequences. We attempt to answer this question in this paper. Viewing from the level of structure, the complete genome of a n organism is made up of coding and noncoding segments. Here the length of a codi ng/noncoding segment means the number of its bases. Based on the lengths of coding/ noncoding segments in the complete genome, we can get three kinds of integer sequen ces by the following ways. i) First we order all lengths of coding and noncoding segment s according to the order of coding and noncoding segments in the complete genome, the n replace the lengths of noncoding segments by their negative numbers. This allows t o distinguish lengths of coding and noncoding segments. This integer sequence is nam edwhole length sequence . ii) We order all lengths of coding segments according to the o rder of coding segments in the complete genome. We name this integer sequence coding length sequence . iii) We order all lengths of noncoding segments according to the order of noncoding segments in the complete genome. This integer sequence is na mednoncoding length sequence . We can now view these three kinds of integer sequences as time series. In the follow- ing, we will investigate the correlation property through Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA)[23]and spectral analysis. 2 Detrended ﬂuctuation analysis and spectral analy- sis We denote a time series as X(t), t= 1,· · ·, N. First the time series is integrated as y(k) =/summationtextk t=1[X(t)−Xave], where Xaveis the average over the whole time period. Next, the integrated time series is divided into boxes of equal len gth,n. In each box of length n, a least-squares line is ﬁt to the data, representing the tren d in that box. The ycoordinate of the straight line segments is denoted by yn(k). We then detrend the integrated time series, y(k), by subtracting the local trend, yn(k), in each box. The root-mean-square ﬂuctuation of this integrated and detrended time series is c alculated as F(n) =/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt1 NN/summationdisplay k=1[y(k)−yn(k)]2 (1) Typically, F(n) will increase with box size n. A linear relationship on a double log graph indicates the presence of scaling F(n)∝nα. (2) Under such conditions, the ﬂuctuations can be characterise d by the scaling exponent α, the slope of the line relating ln F(n) to ln n. For uncorrelated data, the integrated value, y(k) corresponds to a random walk, and therefore, α= 0.5. An value of 0 .5< α < 1.0 37.47.67.888.28.48.68.899.29.4 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7ln(F(n)) ln(n)slope=0.55964 24681012141618202224 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0ln(S(f)) ln(f) Figure 1: Left) Estimate the scale of detrended ﬂuctuation analysis. Right ) An Example of spectral analysis of low frequencies f <1. indicates the presence of LRD so that a large interval is more likely to be followed by a large interval and vice versa. In contrast, 0 < α < 0.5 indicates a diﬀerent type of power-law correlations such that large and small values of t ime series are more likely to alternate. For examples, we give the DFA of the coding length sequence of A. aeolicus on the left of Figure 1. Now we consider the discrete Fourier transform[24]of the time series X(t), t= 1,· · ·, N deﬁned by /hatwiderX(f) =N−1 2N−1/summationdisplay t=0X(t+ 1)e−2πift, (3) then S(f) =\|/hatwiderX(f)\|2(4) is thepower spectrum of X(t). In recent studies, it has been found[25]that many natural phenomena lead to the power spectrum of the form 1 /fβ. This kind of dependence was named 1 /fnoise, in contrast to white noise S(f) =const, i.e.β= 0. Let the frequency f takekvalues fk=k/N, k = 1,· · ·, N. From the ln( f) v.s. ln( S(f)) graph, the existence of 1/fβdoesn’t seem apparent. For example, we give the ﬁgure of the c oding length sequence of A. aeolicus on the right of Figure 1. We also analyse the time series using the quantity M(L), the mean distance a walker spanned within time L. Dunki and Ambuhl[26,27]used this quantity to discuss the scaling property in temporal patterns of schizophrenia. Denote W(j) :=j/summationdisplay t=1[X(t)−Xave], (5) from which we get the walks M(L) :=<\|W(j)−W(j+L)\|>j, (6) where < > jdenotes the average over j, andj= 1,· · ·, N−L. The time shift Ltypically varies from 1 ,· · ·, N/2. From a physics viewpoint, M(L) might be thought of as the 46.577.588.599.51010.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7ln(M(L)) ln(L)'aquae.' 'bbur.' 'tmar.' 67891011121314 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7ln(M'(L)) ln(L)'aquae' 'bbur' 'tmar' Figure 2: Analysis using mean distance a walker spanned with in time L.Left) Estimate the scale α′.Right ) Estimate the scale γ. variance evolution of a random walker’s total displacement mapped from the time series X(t).M(L) may be assessed for LRD[28](e.g.M(L)∝Lα′,α′= 1/2 corresponding to the random case). We give some examples to estimate the scale parameter α′in the left ﬁgure of Figure 2. Dunki et al[27]proposed the following scale which seems to perform better than the scale α′. The deﬁnition W′(j) :=j/summationdisplay t=1\|X(t)−Xave\| (7) leads to M′(L) :=<\|W′(j)−W′(j+L)\|>j. (8) Analyses of test time series showed that (8) are more robust a gainst distortion or dis- cretization of the corresponding amplitudes X(t) than (6). From the ln( L) v.s. ln( M′(L)) plane, we ﬁnd the relation M′(L)∝Lγ. (9) A generated completely random sequence with length 1024 giv es the scale γto be 1.001103. We also carried out this kind of analysis on coding length sequence of A. aeolicus, B. burgdorferi and T. maritima. The results are re ported in the right ﬁgure of Figure 2. 3 Data and results. More than 21 bacterial complete genomes are now available in public databases. There are ﬁve Archaebacteria: Archaeoglobus fulgidus (afu l), Pyrococcus abyssi (pabyssi), Methanococcus jannaschii (mjan), Aeropyrum pernix (aero) and Methanobacterium ther- moautotrophicum (mthe); four Gram-positive Eubacteria: M ycobacterium tuberculosis 5(mtub), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (mpneu), Mycoplasma genita lium (mgen), and Bacillus subtilis (bsub). The others are Gram-negative Eubacteria. These consist of two hyperther- mophilic bacteria: Aquifex aeolicus (aquae) and Thermotog a maritima (tmar); six pro- teobacteria: Rhizobium sp. NGR234 (pNGR234), Escherichia coli (ecoli), Haemophilus inﬂuenzae (hinf), Helicobacter pylori J99 (hpyl99), Helic obacter pylori 26695 (hpyl) and Rockettsia prowazekii (rpxx); two chlamydia Chlamydia tra chomatis (ctra) and Chlamy- dia pneumoniae (cpneu), and two Spirochete: Borrelia burgd orferi (bbur) and Treponema pallidum (tpal). We calculate scales α,βof low frequencies ( f <1) and γof three kinds of length sequences of the above 21 bacteria. The estimated results ar e given in Table 1 ( where we denote by αwhole,αcodandαnoncod the scales of DFA of the whole, coding and noncoding length sequences, from top to bottom, in the increasing orde r of the value of αwhole) and Table 2 ( where we denote by βwhole,βcodandβnoncod the scales of spectral analysis of the whole, coding and noncoding length sequences, from top t o bottom, in the decreasing order of the value of βwhole; we denote by γwhole,γcodandγnoncod the scales of γof the whole, coding and noncoding length sequences). From the right ﬁgure of Figure 1 it is seen that S(f) does not display clear power-law 1/fdependence on the frequencies when f <1. We want to know if there is another region of frequencies in which S(f) displays perfect power-law 1 /fdependence on the frequencies. We carried out the spectral analysis for f >1, and found that S(f) displays almost a perfect power-law 1 /fdependence on the frequencies in some interval: S(f)∝1 fβ. (10) We give the results for coding length sequences of M. genital ium, A. fulgidus, A. aeolicus and E. coli (their length are 303, 1538, 891 and 3034 respecti vely) in Figure 3, where we takekvalues fk= 3k(k= 1,· · ·,1000) of the frequency f. From Figure 3, it is seen that the length of the interval of frequency in which S(f) displays almost a perfect power-law 1/fdepends on the length of the length sequence. The shorter seq uence corresponds to the larger interval. From Figure 3, one can see that the power spectrum exhibit som e kind of periodicity. But the period seems to depend on the length of the sequence. W e also guess that the period also depends on the complexity of the sequence. To sup port this conjecture, we got a promoter DNA sequence from the gene bank, then replaced Aby -2, Cby -1, Gby 1 and Tby 2 (this map is given in [9]); so we obtained a sequence on alp habet {−2,−1,1,2}. Then a subsequences was obtained with the length the same as the coding length sequences of A. aeolicus, A. fulgidus and M. genitali um (their length are 891, 1538 and 303 respectively). A comparison is given in Figure 4, but the results are not clear-cut. 6Table 1: αwhole,αcodandαnoncod of 21 bacteria. Bacteria Category αwhole αcod αnoncod Rhizobium sp. NGR234 Proteobacteria 0.24759 0.11158 0.34342 Mycoplasma genitalium Gram-positive Eubacteria 0.37003 0.25374 0.18111 Chlamydia trachomatis Chlamydia 0.42251 0.37043 0.49373 Thermotoga maritima Hyperthermophilic bacteria 0.43314 0.47659 0.49279 Mycoplasma pneumoniae Gram-positive Eubacteria 0.44304 0.45208 0.49922 Pyrococcus abyssi Archaebacteria 0.48568 0.39271 0.42884 Helicobacter pylori J99 Proteobacteria 0.48770 0.43562 0.42089 Helicobacter pylori 26695 Proteobacteria 0.49538 0.37608 0.41374 Haemophilus inﬂuenzae Proteobacteria 0.49771 0.42432 0.53013 Rickettsia prowazekii Proteobacteria 0.49950 0.33089 0.51923 Chlamydia pneumoniae Chlamydia 0.53982 0.53615 0.38085 Methanococcus jannaschii Archaebacteria 0.54516 0.58380 0.34482 M. tuberculosis Gram-positive Eubacteria 0.55621 0.57479 0.52949 Aeropyrum pernix Archaebacteria 0.57817 0.63248 0.44829 Bacillus subtilis Gram-positive Eubacteria 0.58047 0.59221 0.54480 Borrelia burgdorferi Spirochete 0.58258 0.53687 0.51815 Archaeoglobus fulgidus Archaebacteria 0.59558 0.59025 0.46596 Aquifex aeolicus Hyperthermophilic bacteria 0.59558 0.55964 0.43141 Escherichia coli Proteobacteria 0.60469 0.62011 0.52000 M. thermoautotrophicum Archaebacteria 0.62055 0.64567 0.38825 Treponema pallidum Spirochete 0.67964 0.70297 0.60914 510152025303540455055 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ln(S(f)) ln(f)slope=-1.1425 slope=-1.3538'aquae' 'ecoli' 5101520253035404550 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ln(S(f)) ln(f)slope=-1.4365 slope=-0.8850'aful' 'mgen' Figure 3: There exists 1 /fnoise in the interval of f >1. 7Table 2: βwhole,βcodandβnoncod;γwhole,γcodandγnoncod of 21 bacteria. Bacteria βwhole βcod βnoncod γwhole γcod γnoncod M. genitalium 0.05880 0.02030 -0.00708 1.00017 0.99698 1.01652 H. pylori 26695 0.05026 -0.01412 0.01196 0.99902 1.00057 0.99538 M. jannaschii 0.04850 -0.02640 -0.12547 0.99727 0.99079 0.99767 C. pneumoniae 0.04405 0.01071 -0.01906 0.99998 1.00099 0.99348 A. aeolicus 0.03152 0.00811 -0.00115 1.00441 0.99816 0.99870 H. pylori J99 0.01968 0.04512 -0.05815 0.99867 0.99926 0.99349 T. maritima 0.00737 -0.02656 0.01965 0.99726 0.99524 0.98866 C. trachomatis 0.00256 -0.05829 -0.02549 0.99767 1.00211 0.98553 R. sp. NGR234 0.00230 0.04048 -0.10905 1.00570 0.99612 1.01515 M. thermoauto. -0.00217 -0.11916 0.02079 1.00479 1.00171 1.00063 T. pallidum -0.00422 -0.02902 0.09510 1.01009 1.01532 1.00222 M. pneumoniae -0.01137 0.03437 -0.05573 0.98820 0.98783 0.97260 P. abyssi -0.01589 -0.04242 0.00071 0.99888 0.99816 0.99293 E. coli -0.01917 -0.05513 0.01772 0.99856 1.00197 0.98938 M. tuberculosis -0.02653 -0.05653 -0.02698 1.00062 0.99974 1.00801 A. pernix -0.03882 0.01648 -0.09395 1.00298 1.00407 1.00286 B. burgdorferi -0.04420 -0.05189 -0.10710 0.99287 0.99792 1.03206 R. prowazekii -0.04884 -0.12438 -0.07581 1.00284 0.99043 0.99991 H. inﬂuenzae -0.05338 -0.04853 -0.04341 0.99798 1.00248 0.98684 A. fulgidus -0.06372 -0.08130 -0.00881 1.00347 1.00610 0.98219 B. subtilis -0.06887 -0.17231 -0.02380 0.99629 1.00853 0.98666 -10-50510152025 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ln(S(f)) ln(f)'mgen' 'promdna' -10-50510152025 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ln(S(f)) ln(f)'aquae' 'promdna' 05101520253035404550 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ln(S(f)) ln(f)'aful' 'promdna' Figure 4: Compare the power spectral of length sequences and DNA sequences when f >1. 84 Discussion and conclusions Although the existence of the archaebacterial urkingdom ha s been accepted by many biologists, the classiﬁcation of bacteria is still a matter of controversy[29]. The evolu- tionary relationship of the three primary kingdoms (i.e. ar cheabacteria, eubacteria and eukaryote) is another crucial problem that remains unresol ved[29]. From Table 1, we can roughly divide bacteria into two classes , one class with αwhole less than 0.5, and the other with αwholegreater than 0.5. All Archaebacteria belong to the same class except Pyrococcus abyssi. All Proteobacteri a belong to the same class except E. coli; in particular, the closest Proteobacteria H elicobacter pylori 26695 and Helicobacter pylori J99 group with each other. In the class w ithαwhole<0.5, we have αcod< α noncod except hpyl99 and mgen; but in the other class we have αcod> α noncod. From Table 1 and 2 , we can say that all these sequences are not f ar from being random, hence there is no LRD present except a few bacteria. W hole length sequences are more likely random than other two kinds of length sequenc es. If we consider more details from the exponents αandβ, it seems that there is LRD in these sequences. And the DFA performs better than spectral analysis, which suppo rts the view of [23]. But from Figures 1 and 2, the exponent γis seen more convincing than the exponents αand βbecause the error of estimating γusing the least-squares linear ﬁt is much less than that of the other two exponents. From Table 2, we get γ= 1.0±0.03. Hence we can conclude that all these length sequences are random sequenc es; in other words, there is no trace of LRD in them. On the level of structure in the comple te genome, we have the same conclusion as when we directly consider DNA sequences[14]. We ﬁnd in an interval of frequency ( f >1),S(f) displays perfect power-law 1 /f dependence on the frequencies (see the left ﬁgure of Figure 3 ) S(f)∝1 fβ. The length of the interval of frequency in which S(f) displays almost a perfect power-law 1/fdepends on the length of the length sequence. The shorter seq uence corresponds to the larger interval. The shape of the graph of power spectrum inf >1 also exhibits some kind of periodicity. The period seems to depend on the length and the complexity of the length sequence. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors Zu-Guo Yu and Bin Wang would like to express their tha nks to Prof. Bai-lin Hao of Institute of Theoretical Physics of Chinese Academy o f Science for introducing them into this ﬁeld and continuous encouragement. They also wants to thank Dr. Guo- Yi Chen of ITP for useful discussions. Research is partially supported by Postdoctoral Research Support Grant No. 9900658 of QUT. 9References [1]W. Li and K. Kaneko, Europhys. Lett. 17(1992) 655; W. Li, T. Marr, and K. Kaneko, Physica D 75(1994) 392. [2]C.K. Peng, S. Buldyrev, A.L.Goldberg, S. Havlin, F. Sciorti no, M. Simons, and H.E. Stan- ley,Nature 356(1992) 168. [3]J. Maddox, Nature 358(1992) 103. [4]S. Nee, Nature 357(1992) 450. [5]C.A. Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann and D. Larhammar, Nature 361(1993) 212. [6]V.V. Prabhu and J. M. Claverie, Nature 359(1992) 782. [7]S. Karlin and V. Brendel, Science 259(1993) 677. [8]Liaofu Luo, Weijiang Lee, Lijun Jia, Fengmin Ji and Lu Tsai, Phys. Rev. E 58(1) (1998) 861-871. [9]Zu-Guo Yu and Guo-Yi Chen, Rescaled range and transition mat rix analysis of DNA sequences. Comm. Theor. Phys. 33(4) (2000) 673-678. [10](a) R. Voss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(1992) 3805; (b) Fractals 2(1994) 1. [11]H.E. Stanley, S.V. Buldyrev, A.L. Goldberg, Z.D. Goldberg, S. Havlin, R.N. Mantegna, S.M. Ossadnik, C.K. Peng, and M. Simons, Physica A 205(1994) 214. [12]H.Herzel, W. Ebeling, and A.O. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. E 50(1994) 5061. [13]P. Allegrini, M. Barbi, P. Grigolini, and B.J. West, Phys. Rev. E 52(1995) 5281. [14]A. Arneodo, E. Bacry, P.V. Graves, and J. F. Muzy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(1995) 3293. [15]A. K. Mohanty and A.V.S.S. Narayana Rao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(8) (2000) 1832-1835. [16]C. M. Fraser et al., The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium, Science , 270(1995) 397. [17]Zu-Guo Yu, Bai-lin Hao, Hui-min Xie and Guo-Yi Chen, Dimensi on of fractals related to language deﬁned by tagged strings in complete genome. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals (2000) (to appear). [18]Bai-lin Hao, Hoong-Chien Lee, and Shu-yu Zhang, Fractals re lated to long DNA sequences and complete genomes, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals ,11(6) (2000) 825-836. [19]Bai-Lin Hao, Hui-Ming Xie, Zu-Guo Yu and Guo-Yi Chen , Avoide d strings in bacterial complete genomes and a related combinatorial problem. Ann. of Combinatorics. (2000) (to appear). [20]Zu-Guo Yu and Bin Wang, A time series model of CDS sequences on complete genome, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals (2000) (to appear). [21]A. Provata and Y. Almirantis, Fractal Cantor patterns in the sequence structure of DNA. Fractals 8(1)(2000) 15-27. 10[22]Zu-Guo Yu and Vo Anh, Time series model based on global struct ure of complete genome, Chaos, Soliton & Fractals (Accepted for publication). [23]A. L. Goldberger, C. K. Peng, J. Hausdorﬀ, J. Mietus,S. Havli n and H. E. Stanley, Fractals and the Heart, in Fractal Geometry in Biological Systems , Edited by P. M. Iannaccone and M. Khokha, CRC Press, Inc, 1996, Pages 249-266. [24]R.H. Shumway, Applied Statistical Time Series Analysis, Pr entice Hall, Englewood Cliﬀs, New Jersey, 1988. [25]F.N.H. Robinson, Noise and Fluctuations, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974. [26]R.M. Dunki and B. Ambuhl, Physica A 230(1996) 544-553. [27]R.M. Dunki, E. Keller, P. F. Meier, B. Ambuhl, Physica A 276(2000) 596-609. [28]C.K. Peng, J.E. Mietus, J.M. Hausdorﬀ, S. Havlin, H.E. Stanl ey and A.L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70(1993) 1343-1346. [29]N. Iwabe et al, Evolutionary relationship of archeabacteria,eubacteri a, and eukaryotes infer from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86(1989) 9355- 9359. 11-50000-40000-30000-20000-10000010000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900y(k) k1e+091.5e+092e+092.5e+093e+093.5e+094e+094.5e+09 0.00012 0.00014 0.00016 0.00018 0.00020.00022 0.00024 0.00026 0.00028 0.00030.00032Power spectrum S(f) Frequency f'aquae' 'bbur' 'tpal' 'tmar'02e+064e+066e+068e+061e+071.2e+071.4e+071.6e+07 00.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1Power spectrum S(f) Frequency f
arXiv:physics/0006080v1 [physics.bio-ph] 30 Jun 2000A time series model of CDS sequences in complete genome Zu-Guo Yu1,2and Bin Wang2 1Department of Mathematics, Xiangtan University, Hunan 411 105, China.∗ 2Institute of Theoretical Physics, Academia Sinica , P.O. Box 2735, Beijing 100080, China. Abstract A time series model of CDS sequences in complete genome is pro posed. A map of DNA sequence to integer sequence is given. The correlation d imensions and Hurst exponents of CDS sequences in complete genome of bacteria ar e calculated. Using the average of correlation dimensions, some interesting re sults are obtained. PACS numbers: 87.10+e, 47.53+n Key words : Correlation dimension, Hurst exponent, complete genome, 1 Introduction In the past decade or so there has been a ground swell of intere st in unraveling the mys- teries of DNA. With improving of the technique of gene clone a nd sequences determined, the DNA sequence data base become huge rapidly. Doing DNA seq uence analysis only use the experimental method does not ﬁt this rapid. Hence it b ecomes very important to improve new theoretical methods. One approach that has, in j ust a few years, proven to be particularly fruitful in this regard is statistical anal ysis of DNA sequences[1−9]using modern statistical measures, including the works on the cor relation properties of coding and noncoding DNA sequences. The second approach is linguis tic approach. DNA se- quence can be seen as analogous at a number of levels to mechan isms of processing other kinds of languages, such as natural languages and computer l anguages[10]. Third, using ∗This is the permanent corresponding address of the ﬁrst auth or, e-mail: yuzg@hotmail.com 1nonlinear scales method, such as fractal dimension[11,12,13], complexity[14,15]. How- ever, DNA sequences are more complicated than these types of analysis can describes. Therefore, it is crucial to develop new tools for analysis wi th a view toward uncovering mechanisms used to code other types of information. Since the ﬁrst complete genome of a free-living bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium was sequenced in 1995[16], an ever-growing number of complete genomes has been deposi ted in public databases. The availability of complete genomes o pens the possibility to ask some global questions on these sequences. Our group also dis cussed the avoided and under-represented strings in some bacterial complete geno mes[13,17,18]. In this paper, we propose a new model to DNA sequences, i.e. the time series m odel. First we want to compute the correlation dimension and Hurst exponents of each CDS sequence in the complete genome, then consider the distribution of thes e two quantities on complete genomes of Bacteria. It is a global problem. Last we want to di scuss the classiﬁcation problem of Bacteria using our results. For the present purpose, a DNA sequence may be regard as a sequ ence over the alphabet {A, C, G, T }representing the four bases from which DNA is assembled, nam ely adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine. For a DNA sequence , we deﬁne a map fas following: f:A− → − 2 C− → − 1 G− →1 T− →2.(1) Then we obtain an data sequence {xk:k= 1,2,· · ·, N}, where xk∈ {−2,−1,1,2}. We formal view this sequence as a time series. According to th e deﬁnition of f, the four bases {A, C, G, T }are mapped to four distinct value. One can also use {−2,−1,1,2}to replace {A, G, C, T }or other orders of A, G, C, T . our main aim is distinguish AandG from purine, CandTfrom pyrimidine. We expect it to reveal more information tha n one dimensional DNA walk[4]. 2 Correlation dimension and Hurst exponent The notion of correlation dimension, introduced by Grassbe rger and Procaccia[19,20], suits well experimental situations, when only a single time series is available, it is now being used widely in many branches of physical science. Give n a sequence of data from a computer or laboratory experiment x1, x2, x3,· · ·, xN (2) 2where Nis a big enough number. These number are usually sampled at an equal time interval ∆ τ. We embed the time series into Rm, choose a time delay τ=p∆τ, then obtain yi= (xi, xi+p, xi+2p,· · ·, xi+(m−1)p), i= 1,2,· · ·, Nm (3) where Nm=N−(m−1)p. (4) In this way we get Nmvectors of embedding space Rm. For any yi,yj, we deﬁne the distance as rij=d(yi,yj) =m−1/summationdisplay l=0\|xi+lp−xj+lp\|. (5) If the distance is less than a present number r, we say that these two vectors are correlated. The correlation integral is deﬁned as Cm(r) =1 N2 mNm/summationdisplay i,j=1H(r−rij) (6) where His the Heaviside function H(x) =  1,ifx >0 0,ifx≤0(7) For a proper choice of mand not too big a value of r, it has been shown by Grassberger and Procaccia[20]that the correlation integral Cm(r) behaves like Cm(r)∝rD2(m). (8) Thus one can deﬁne correlation dimension as D2= limm−→∞D2(m) = limm−→∞lim r−→0lnCm(r) lnr. (9) For more details of D2, the reader can refer to ref.[21]. To deal with practical problem, one usually choose p= 1. From Page 346 of ref.[21], if we choose an sequence {ri: 1≤i≤n}such that r1< r2< r3<· · ·< rn, then in the lnr−lnCm(r) plane, we can look for a scaling region. Then the slop of the s caling region isD2(m). When D2(m) dose not change with mincreasing, we can take this D2(m0) as the estimate value of D2. We calculate the correlation dimension of some DNA sequenc es using the method introduced above. From the ln r−lnCm(r) ﬁgures of these sequences of diﬀerent value of embedding dimension m, we ﬁnd that it is suitable to choose m= 7. For example, we give the ln r−lnCm(r) ﬁgure of Phage’s 5’UTR sequence when m= 7,8 3-6-5-4-3-2-101 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4ln(C_m(r)) ln(r)'m=7' 'm=8' Figure 1: ln r−lnCm(r) ﬁgure of phage 5’UTR sequence when m=7,8. (Figure 1). We take the region from the third point to the 17th point (from left to right) as the scaling region To study time series, Hurst[22]invented a new statistical method — the rescaled range analysis (R/Sanalysis), later on B. B. Mandelbrot[23]and J. Feder[24]transplanted R/S analysis into fractal analysis. For any time series x={xk}N k=1and any 2 ≤n≤N, one can deﬁne < x > n=1 nn/summationdisplay i=1xi (10) X(i, n) =i/summationdisplay u=1[xu−< x > n] (11) R(n) = max 1≤i≤nX(i, n)−min 1≤i≤nX(i, n) (12) S(n) = [1 nn/summationdisplay i=1(xi−< x > n)2]1/2. (13) Hurst found that R(n)/S(n)∼(n 2)H. (14) His called Hurst exponent . 400.511.522.533.544.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7ln(R/S) ln(n)H=0.673099 Figure 2: An example of R/Sanalysis of DNA sequence Asnchanges from 2 to N, we obtain N−1 points in ln( n) v.s. ln( R(n)/S(n)) plane. Then we can calculate Hurst exponent Hof DNA sequence susing the least-square linear ﬁt. As an example, we plot the graph of R/Sanalysis of an exon segment sof mouse’ DNA sequence (bp 1730– bp 2650 of the record with Accession AF 033620 in Genbank) in Figure 2. The Hurst exponent is usually used as a measure of complexity . From Page 149 of Ref.[22], the trajectory of the record is a curve with a fract al dimension D= 2−H. Hence a smaller Hmeans a more complex system. When applied to fractional Brow nian motion, if H >1/2, the system is said to be persistent , which means that if for a given time period t, the motion is along one direction, then in the succeeding ttime, it’s more likely that the motion will follow the same direction. While for system with H <1/2, the opposite holds, that is, antipersistent . But when H= 1/2, the system is Brown motion, and is random. 3 Data and results. More than 18 bacterial complete genomes are now available in public databases . There are four Archaebacteria: Archaeoglobus fulgidus (aful), P yrococcus horikoshii (pyro), Methanococcus jannaschii (mjan), and Methanobacterium th ermoautotrophicum (mthe); 5Table 1: Average of D2of genes of 18 bacteria. Average of D2species of Bacterium Category 2.805 Mycoplasma genitalium (mgen) Gram-positive Eubacteria 2.827 Methanococcus jannaschii (mjan) Archaebacteria 2.872 Rockettsia prowazekii (rpxx) Proteobacteria 2.883 Helicobacter pylori 26695 (hpyl) Proteobacteria 2.908 Helicobacter pylori J99 (hpyl99) Proteobacteria 2.938 Haemophilus inﬂuenzae (hinf) Proteobacteria 2.940 Mycoplasma pneumoniae (mpneu) Gram-positive Eubacteria 2.950 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (mtub) Gram-positive Eubacteria 2.990 Bacillus subtilis (bsub) Gram-positive Eubacteria 3.011 Aquifex aeolicus (aquae) hyperthermophilic bacterium 3.012 Pyrococcus horikoshii (pyro) Archaebacteria 3.013 M. thermoautotrophicum Archaebacteria (mthe) 3.016 Archaeoglobus fulgidus (aful) Archaebacteria 3.020 Chlamydia trachomatis (ctra) Chlamydia 3.024 Chlamydia pneumoniae (cpneu) Chlamydia 3.028 Synechocystis PCC6803 (synecho) Cyanobacteria 3.047 Rhizobium sp. NGR234 (pNGR234) Proteobacteria 3.060 Escherichia coli (ecoli) Proteobacteria four Gram-positive Eubacteria: Mycobacterium tuberculos is (mtub), Mycoplasma pneu- moniae (mpneu), Mycoplasma genitalium (mgen), and Bacillu s subtilis (bsub). The oth- ers are Gram-negative Eubacteria: one hyperthermophilic b acterium Aquifex aeolicus (aquae); six proteobacteria: Rhizobium sp. NGR234 (pNGR23 4), Escherichia coli (ecoli), Haemophilus inﬂuenzae (hinf), Helicobacter pylori J99 (hp yl99), Helicobacter pylori 26695 (hpyl) and Rockettsia prowazekii (rpxx); two chlamydia Chl amydia trachomatis (ctra) and Chlamydia pneumoniae (cpneu), and one cyanobacterium S ynechocystis PCC6803 (synecho). For a given bacterium, we calculate the correlation dimensi on and Hurst exponent of each CDS sequence (i.e. the coding sequence) in its complete genome ﬁrst (the results is shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4), then calculate the average of these two quantities. We ﬁnd that the average of Hurst exponents of 18 bacteria are alm ost equal (range being from 0.538 to 0.590). But the diﬀerences among the values of avera ge of correlation dimensions of these bacteria are larger. One can see Table 1 (from top to b ottom, the value of D2 6become larger). 4 Discussion and conclusions Although the existence of the archaebacterial urkingdom ha s been accepted by many biologists, the classiﬁcation of bacteria is still a matter of controversy[25]. The evolu- tionary relationship of the three primary kingdoms (i.e. ar cheabacteria, eubacteria and eukaryote) is another crucial problem that remains unresol ved[25]. From Table 1, we can roughly divide bacteria into two class ﬁr st, the average of D2 of one class is less than 3.0, that of another class is greater than 3.0. We can see that the classiﬁcation of bacteria using the average of D2is almost coincide with the original classiﬁcation of bacteria. Archaebacteria gather with eac h other except mjan. Gram- positive bacteria get together except mgen. Chlamydia also gather with each other. Proteobacteria is divided into two sub-category: rpxx, hpy l, hpyl99 and hinf belong to one sub-category; pNGR234 and ecoli belong another sub-cat egory. A surprising feature shown in Table 1 is that Aquifex aeolicu s is linked closely with the Archaebacteria. We noticed that Aquifex, like most Archaeb acteria, is hyperthermophilic. It has previously been shown that Aquifex has close relation ship with Archaebacteria from the gene comparison of an enzyme needed for the synthesis of t he amino acid trytophan[26]. Our result, from the comparison of the complete genome, show s that the case is even more worse. Such strong correlation on the level of complete genome between Aquifex and Archaebacteria is not easily accounted for by lateral tr ansfer and other accidental events[26]. We calculate the average of correlation dimensions and Hurs t exponents of genes in all 16 chromosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast), they ar e 3.018 and 0.579 respectively. From Table 1, one can see that Archaebacteria and Chlamydia a re linked more closely with yeast which belongs to eukaryote than other category of bacteria. There are several reports (such as Ref. [27]), in some RNA and protein species, archeabacteria are much more similar in sequences to eukaryotes than to eubacteria. Our present result supports this point of view. We also randomly produce a sequence of length 3000 consistin g of symbols from the alphabet {A, T, G, C }. The correlation dimension is 1.02883. From Table 1, Fig. 3, we can conclude that all CDS sequences are far from random seque nces. Since the Hurst exponent of random sequence is 0.5. From Fig. 4, we can see tha t correlation dimension is well than Hurst exponent when we compare real DNA sequence with a random sequence on the alphabet {A, T, G, C }. In Ref. [14], we ﬁnd the Hurst exponent is a good exponent to di stinct diﬀerent 7functional regions, but now we only consider the same kind of functional region (i.e. they are all genes), it is reasonable that the average of Hurst exp onent do not change much. Fortunately, now we can use the average of correlation dimen sion to distinguish diﬀerent species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their thanks to Prof. Bai-l in Hao for reading the manuscript carefully, encouragement and many good suggest ions. References [1] W. Li and K. Kaneko, Europhys. Lett. 17(1992) 655. [2] A. Grosberg, Y. Rabin, S. Havlin, and A. Neer, Europhys. Lett. 23(1993) 373. [3] (a) R. Voss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(1992) 3805; (b) Fractals 2(1994) 1. [4] C.K. Peng, S. Buldyrev, A.L.Goldberg, S. Havlin, F. Scio rtino, M. Simons, and H.E. Stanley, Nature 356(1992) 168. [5] H.E. Stanley, S.V. Buldyrev, A.L. Goldberg, Z.D. Goldbe rg, S. Havlin, R.N. Man- tegna, S.M. Ossadnik, C.K. Peng, and M. Simons, Physica A 205(1994) 214. [6] H.Herzel, W. Ebeling, and A.O. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. E 50(1994) 5061. [7] P. Allegrini, M. Barbi, P. Grigolini, and B.J. West, Phys. Rev. E 52(1995) 5281. [8] S. V. Buldyrev, N.V. Dokholyan, A.L. Goldberger, S. Havl in, C.-K. Peng, H.E. Stanley and G.M. Visvanathan, Physica A 249(1998) 430-438. [9] Liaofu Luo, Weijiang Lee, Lijun Jia, Fengmin Ji and Lu Tsa i,Phys. Rev. E 58(1) (1998) 861-871. [10] D.B. Searls, Computer Appl. in Biosciences (CABIOS) 13(1997) 333-344. [11] L. F. Lou, Tsai Li, and Y. M. Zhou, J. Theor. Biol. 130(1988) 351. [12] L.F. Luo and L. Tsai, Chin. Phys. Lett. 5(1988) 421-424. [13] Zu-Guo Yu, Bai-lin Hao, Hui-min Xie and Guo-Yi Chen, Dim ension of fractals re- lated to language deﬁned by tagged strings in complete genom e.Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (Accepted for publication). 8[14] Zu-Guo Yu and Guo-Yi Chen, Rescaled range and transitio n matrix analysis of DNA sequences. Communication of Theor. Phys. (Accepted for publication). [15] Ruqun Shen, Rensheng Chen, Lunjiang Lin, Jian Sun, Yi Xi ao, and Jun Xu, Chinese Science Bulletin (in Chinese) 38(1993) 1995-1997. [16] C. M. Fraser et al., The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium, Sci- ence,270(1995) 397. [17] Bai-lin Hao, Hoong-Chien Lee, and Shu-yu Zhang, Fracta ls related to long DNA sequences and complete genomes, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals , to appear (1999). [18] Bai-Lin Hao, Hui-Ming Xie, Zu-Guo Yu and Guo-Yi Chen , Av oided strings in bacte- rial complete genomes and a related combinatorial problem. Ann. of Combinatorics. , to appear (1999). [19] P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Physica D 9(1983) 189. [20] P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50(1983) 346. [21] Hao Bai-lin, Elementary Symbolic Dynamics and Chaos in Dissipative Systems. World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1989. [22] H.E. Hurst, Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs, Trans. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng. 116(1951) 770-808. [23] B.B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature , W. H. Freeman, New York, 1982. [24] J. Feder, Fractals , Plenum Press, New York, London, 1988. [25] N. Iwabe et al, Evolutionary relationship of archeabacteria,eubacteri a, and eukaryotes infer from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989) 9355-9359. [26] E. Pennisi, Genome data shake the tree of life, Science 286(1998) 672. [27] K. Lechner, G. Heller & A. B¨ ock, Nucleic Acids Res. 16(1988) 7817-7826. 922.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500D_2 n'aful' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600D_2 n'aquae' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500D_2 n'bsub' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200D_2 n'cpneu' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900D_2 n'ctra' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500D_2 n'ecoli' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800D_2 n'hinf' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600D_2 n'hpyl' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600D_2 n'hpyl99' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500D_2 n'mgen' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800D_2 n'mjan' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700D_2 n'mpneu' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000D_2 n'mthe' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000D_2 n'mtub' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450D_2 n'pNGR234' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000D_2 n'pyro' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900D_2 n'rpxx' 22.22.42.62.833.23.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500D_2 n'synecho'/BY/CX/CV/D9/D6/CT /BF/BM /CC/CW/CT /D3/D6/D6/CT/D0/D0/CP/D8/CX/D3/D2 /CS/CX/D1/CT/D2/D7/CX/D3/D2/D7 /D3/CU /BV/BW/CB /D7/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2 /CT/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D3/D1/D4/D0/CT/D8/CT /CV/CT/D2/D3/D1/CT /D3/CU /BD/BK/CQ/CP /D8/CT/D6/CX/CP/BA 1000.20.40.60.81 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500H n'aful' 00.20.40.60.81 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600H n'aquae' 00.20.40.60.81 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500H n'bsub' 00.20.40.60.81 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200H n'cpneu' 00.20.40.60.81 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900H n'ctra' 00.20.40.60.81 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500H n'ecoli' 00.20.40.60.81 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800H n'hinf' 00.20.40.60.81 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600H n'hpyl' 00.20.40.60.81 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600H n'hpyl99' 00.20.40.60.81 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500H n'mgen' 00.20.40.60.81 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800H n'mjan' 00.20.40.60.81 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700H n'mpneu' 00.20.40.60.81 0200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000H n'mthe' 00.20.40.60.81 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000H n'mtub' 00.20.40.60.81 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450H n'pNGR234' 00.20.40.60.81 0200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000H n'pyro' 00.20.40.60.81 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900H n'rpxx' 00.20.40.60.81 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500H n'synecho'/BY/CX/CV/D9/D6/CT /BG/BM /CC/CW/CT /C0/D9/D6/D7/D8 /CT/DC/D4 /D3/D2/CT/D2 /D8/D7 /D3/CU /BV/BW/CB /D7/CT/D5/D9/CT/D2 /CT/D7 /CX/D2 /D8/CW/CT /D3/D1/D4/D0/CT/D8/CT /CV/CT/D2/D3/D1/CT /D3/CU /BD/BK /CQ/CP /D8/CT/D6/CX/CP/BA 11
arXiv:physics/0006081v1 [physics.bio-ph] 30 Jun 2000Synchronisation, binding and the role of correlated ﬁring in fast information transmission Simon R. Schultz1, Huw D. R. Golledge2, and Stefano Panzeri2 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute & Center for Neural Science , New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA 2Department of Psychology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK stefano.panzeri@ncl.ac.uk http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/stefano.panzeri/ Abstract. Does synchronization between action potentials from diﬀer - ent neurons in the visual system play a substantial role in so lving the binding problem? The binding problem can be studied quantit atively in the broader framework of the information contained in neura l spike trains about some external correlate, which in this case is object c onﬁgurations in the visual ﬁeld. We approach this problem by using a mathem atical formalism that quantiﬁes the impact of correlated ﬁring in s hort time scales. Using a power series expansion, the mutual informat ion an ensem- ble of neurons conveys about external stimuli is broken down into ﬁring rate and correlation components. This leads to a new quantiﬁ cation pro- cedure directly applicable to simultaneous multiple neuro n recordings. It theoretically constrains the neural code, showing that cor relations con- tribute less signiﬁcantly than ﬁring rates to rapid informa tion processing. By using this approach to study the limits upon the amount of i nforma- tion that an ideal observer is able to extract from a synchron y code, it may be possible to determine whether the available amount of infor- mation is suﬃcient to support computational processes such as feature binding. 1 Introduction Does synchronization (or more generally temporal correlat ions) between action potentials from diﬀerent cells in the central visual system play a substantial role in solving crucial computational problems, such as binding of visual features or ﬁgure/ground segmentation? One theory suggests that syn chrony between members of neuronal assemblies is the mechanism used by the c erebral cortex for associating the features of a coherent single object [1] . Although several groups have reported compelling experime ntal evidence from the visual system in support of this theory (for a review see [2]), the role played by synchronous ﬁring in visual feature binding is sti ll highly controversial [3,4,5,6], and far from being understood. In our view, it is p ossible that one or more methodological factors contribute to the continuing u ncertainty about thisissue. In fact, almost all the reported neurophysiological evidence in favor or against the temporal binding hypothesis relies upon the ass essment of the sig- niﬁcance of peaks in cross-correlograms (CCG, [7]) and of th eir modulation with respect to stimulus conﬁguration. While investigating sti mulus modulation of peaks (or of other features) of CCGs can clearly bear some evi dence on the role of synchrony in binding, it does not address the crucial issu e ofhow much syn- chrony tells the brain about the conﬁguration of objects in t he visual ﬁeld. This question is particularly important as it is well known that ﬁ ring rates of individ- ual cells are commonly related to features of the sensory wor ld [8], and even to perceptual judgements (see e.g. [9,10]). Firing rate modul ations can potentially contribute to association of features through the use of pop ulation codes, or also in other ways[3]. Therefore the speciﬁc contribution of syn chrony (or in general of correlations between ﬁring of cells) as a coding mechanis m for binding should be assessed against the contribution of independent ﬁring r ate modulation to the encoding of object conﬁgurations in the visual ﬁeld. To address these issues, a pure analysis of CCG characterist ics is insuﬃcient. In addition to CCG quantiﬁcation, information theory can be used to address the speciﬁc contribution of synchronized or correlated ﬁri ng to visual feature binding, and to compare the contribution of synchrony again st that of ﬁring rates. In fact, Information theory [11] allows one to take th e point of view of an ideal observer trying to reconstruct the stimulus conﬁgura tion just based on the observation of the activity of neuronal population, and to d etermine how much the presence of correlated ﬁring helps in identifying the st imulus. In this paper we present and develop a rigorous information t heoretic frame- work to investigate the role of temporal correlations betwe en spikes. We ﬁrst discuss how information theory could overcome the limitati ons of the pure CCG analysis. We then present a mathematical formalism that all ows us to divide the information into components which represent the informati on encoding mecha- nisms used by neuronal populations – i.e. it determines how m any bits of infor- mation were present in the ﬁring rates, how many in coinciden t ﬁring by pairs of neurons, etc., with all of these adding up to the overall av ailable information. The mathematical approach developed here is valid for times cales which are shorter than or of the order of a typical interval between spi ke emissions, and it makes use of a Taylor series approximation to the informatio n, keeping terms up to the second order in the time window length. This approxima tion is not merely mathematically convenient; short timescales are likely to be of direct relevance to information processing by the brain, as there is substantia l evidence that much sensory information is transmitted by neuronal activity in very short periods of time [12,13,14]. Therefore the mathematical analysis is re levant to the study of the computations underlying perceptual processes. In part icular, it enables the quantitative study of the rapidly appearing correlational assemblies that have been suggested to underlie feature binding and ﬁgure/groun d segmentation.2 Problems with conventional Cross-Correlogram analysis The CCG represents a histogram of the probability of a spike f rom one neu- ron at a given time relative to a reference spike of a second ne uron [7]. Whilst cross-correlation is capable of identifying synchrony bet ween neurons, several aspects of the analysis of CCGs present problems or are incom plete. First, CCG analysis itself does not provide a criterion to choose which periods of a response epoch should be analysed. Since, in many cases, moving stimu li are employed, the response varies with time and it may be that correlations are present or are stimulus modulated for only a short part of the response [15] . This short period is not necessarily related simply to the response peak, alth ough some studies have analysed only the period in which the peak of the respons e is made to a moving stimulus [16]. Second, the width of the time window ov er which corre- lations should be assessed is arbitrary. CCG analysis does n ot entirely address over which time scales correlations contribute most inform ation about object conﬁguration. Using long windows (e.g. much larger than the width of CCG peaks) may “wash out” transient correlations. Narrow windo ws centered upon the PSTH peak may ignore the part of the responses that contai ns most of the information about the stimuli (e.g. in ﬁring rate modula tions). Third, if the window length used to assess correlations is varied betw een stimulus condi- tions (e.g [16]) then an undesirable extra source of variati on is introduced when the stimulus conditions are compared. Information theory c an mitigate some of these problems by providing a criterion for the selection of time windows, by identifying the windows in which most information is actual ly transmitted. Many previous studies also diﬀer in the methods used to quant ify the tempo- ral structure in CCGs. Some studies rely on the ﬁtting of a dam ped sine wave to the CCG (e.g. [5,17]). Other methods quantify solely the lik elihood that the peak in the CCG did not arise by chance [18]. Analysis of the signiﬁ cance of a peak, or of structure in the CCG must be made in relation to the ﬂanks of the CCG. What length of ﬂank is chosen will aﬀect the signiﬁcance of pe aks. However, downstream neurons are unlikely to be able to compare the lik elihoods of spikes occurring at lags of tens of milliseconds against the likeli hood of simultaneous spikes. The parameters of a CCG do not themselves quantify the inform ational con- tribution of synchronous ﬁring. Conventional CCG analysis techniques attempt to assess correlation in a manner independent of the ﬁring ra te in order to dis- ambiguate synchronous modulations from ﬁring rate variati ons. It is unlikely, though, that any downstream detector of the synchronous dis charge of neurons would be capable of assessing the signiﬁcance of correlatio n independent of the ﬁring rate. It is more likely that it would make use of the actu al number of coinci- dent spikes available in its integration time window. There fore cross-correlation peaks and ﬁring rate modulation are probably intrinsically linked in transmit- ting information to downstream neurons, and an analysis of t he functional role of synchrony should be able to take this into account. Most st udies that ap- pear to show stimulus-dependent synchrony have employed re latively stronglystimulated cells. An important prediction of the temporal c orrelation hypothesis is that synchrony should encompass the responses of sub-opt imally stimulated neurons [19]. A thorough test of this hypothesis requires th e study of cells that ﬁre very few spikes. The number of spikes included in the calc ulation of a CCG of course aﬀects the precision with which correlations can b e detected [20]. Vari- ations in the number of evoked spikes, rather than a true chan ge in correlation between the neurons, could thus aﬀect comparisons between o ptimal and sub- optimal stimuli. While analysing cells ﬁring at low rates ma y be a challenge for CCG analysis, it is tractable for analyses developed from in formation theory, as we shall see in Section 4. 3 Information Theory and Neuronal Responses We believe that the methodological ambiguities that attend studies purely based on quantiﬁcation of spike train correlograms can be greatly reduced by employing in addition methods based upon information theory [11], as w e describe in this Section. Information theory [11] measures the statistical signiﬁca nce of how neuronal responses co-vary with the diﬀerent stimuli presented at th e sensory periphery. Therefore it determines how much information neuronal resp onses carry about the particular set of stimuli presented during an experimen t. Unlike other sim- pler measures, like those of signal detection theory, which take into account only the mean response and its standard deviation, information t heory allows one to consider the role of the entire probability distributions. A measure of information thus requires sampling experimentally the probabilities P(r\|s) of a neuronal pop- ulation response rto all stimuli s in the set, as well as designing the experimen tal frequencies of presentation P(s) of each stimulus. The information measure is performed by computing the distance between the joint stimu lus-response prob- abilities P(r, s) =P(r\|s)P(s) and the product of the two probabilities P(r)P(s), (P(r) being the unconditional response probability) as follows : I(S;R) =/summationdisplay s/summationdisplay rP(s, r)log2P(s, r) P(s)P(r)(1) If there is a statistical relationship between stimuli and r esponses (i.e. if P(r, s) is dissimilar from P(r)P(s)) , our knowledge about what stimulus was presented increases after the observation of one neuronal s pike train. Eq. (1) quantiﬁes this fact. The stronger the statistical relation ship between stimuli and responses, the higher is the information value. Eq. (1) thus quantiﬁes how well an ideal observer could discriminate between diﬀerent stimul us conditions, based on a single response trial. There are several advantages in usi ng information theory to quantify how reliably the activity of a set of neurons enco des the events in the sensory periphery [21,22]. First, information theory p uts the performance of neuronal responses on a scale deﬁned at the ratio level of m easurement. For example, an increase of 30% of on the peak height of a cross-co rrelogram does not tell us how this relates to synchrony-based stimulus discri mination, but values ofinformation carried by synchronous ﬁring have a precise mea ning. Information theory measures the reduction of uncertainty about the stim ulus following the observation of a neuronal response on a logarithmic scale. O ne bit of information corresponds to a reduction by a factor of two in the stimulus u ncertainty. A second advantage of information theory in this context is th at it does not require any speciﬁc assumption about the distance between response s or the stationarity of the processes, and it can therefore lead to objective asse ssments of some of the hypotheses. In the above discussion we have mentioned that we are calcula ting informa- tion ‘about a stimulus’. In fact, more generally it can be inf ormation ‘about’ any quantiﬁable external correlate, but we shall continue to us e the word stimulus in an extended sense. If we were studying information about t he orientation of a grating, we would deﬁne our stimulus to be which of a number o f diﬀerent ori- entations the grating appeared at on any given experimental trial. If we wish to study problems such as binding or ﬁgure-ground segregation within this frame- work, we have to specify our stimulus description according ly. An illustration of this is shown in the scene of Fig. 1, which contains two object s in front of a back- ground. Also shown are a number of receptive ﬁelds, which are taken to be those of cells from which we are simultaneously recording the acti vity (‘spike trains’). We can deﬁne our stimulus, or external correlate, as a multid imensional variable representing the object to which each receptive ﬁeld is asso ciated. The dimen- sionality of our stimulus is in this case the number of cells f rom which we are recording at once. By quantifying the information containe d in the spike trains about this variable, and breaking it down into individual co mponents reﬂecting ﬁring rates and correlations (or synchronisation), we can d etermine the aspects of the spike train which best encode the ﬁgure-ground (or obj ect-object-ground) segregation. Furthermore, by examining how this relations hip scales with the stimulus dimensionality (number of receptive ﬁelds record ed from), it may be possible to determine whether enough information is presen t in correlations to support binding in perceptually realistic environments. It is worth noticing that information values are always rela tive to the stimu- lus set used, and that testing a neuron with diﬀerent stimuli may lead to rather diﬀerent information values. This has some interesting imp lications. On the one hand, it allows us to characterise neuronal selectivity by s earching for a stimulus set that maximises the neuronal information transfer, a mor e rational charac- terisation strategy than searching for stimuli eliciting s ustained responses. On the other hand, the intrinsic dependency of mutual informat ion values on the nature of stimulus set allows us to test whether diﬀerent enc oding strategies are used by visual cortical neurons when dealing with external c orrelates of a dif- ferent nature. The last property is of interest because one o f the predictions of the binding-by-synchrony hypothesis is that synchrony is p articularly important when stimulus conﬁgurations requiring some kind of associa tions are included, and less important in other situations. Information theory thus provides a nat- ural framework to test this theory.s0 s1 s2 Fig.1. An illustrative segregation problem in which there are two o bjects in front of a background. The background is labeled by s0, and the objects by s1 ands2respectively. The dashed ellipses represent the receptive ﬁelds of visual cortical cells which we are recording the responses of simul taneously. This situa- tion can be examined in the framework of information theory b y considering the ‘stimulus’ to be a multidimensional variable indicating wh ich object ( s0,s1ors2) is associated with each receptive ﬁeld. The problem is thus t o determine which response characteristics are most informative about the vi sual conﬁguration.4 Series expansion of the mutual information Although information theory is, as explained, a natural fra mework to address the role of correlated ﬁring on e.g. binding of visual features, some work is needed to separate out of the total information contained in a populat ion response rinto components, each reﬂecting the speciﬁc contribution of an e ncoding mechanism. We perform this separation in the limit in which the relevant window for infor- mation encoding is short enough that the population typical ly emits few action potentials in response to a stimulus. As discussed in the int roduction and in [23], there is evidence that this is a relevant limit for stud ying the computations underlying perception, as cortical areas in several cases p erform their computa- tions within a time frame which is shorter than one typical in terspike interval [13,14]. We examine a period of time of duration t, in which a stimulus sis present. The neuronal population response rduring this time is taken to be described by the number of spikes ﬁred by each cell1in the window t. We study the informa- tion carried by the responses of a neuronal population about which stimulus is presented. It can be approximated by a power series I(t) =t It+1 2t2Itt+O(t3). (2) The problem is thus to compute the ﬁrst two time derivatives o f the information, ItandItt, which are all that survive at short timescales. Two kinds of correlations inﬂuence the information. These a re the “signal” (mean response to each stimulus) correlation and the “noise ” (variability from the mean across diﬀerent trials with the same stimulus) corr elation between cells. In the short timescale limit the noise correlation can be qua ntiﬁed as γij(s) =ni(s)nj(s) (ni(s)nj(s))−1,(i/negationslash=j)γii(s) =(ni(s)2−ni(s)) ni(s)2−1,(3) where ni(s) is the number of spikes emitted by cell iin a given trial in response to stimulus s, and the bar denotes an average across experimental trials t o the same stimulus. The signal correlation can be measured as νij=<ri(s)rj(s)>s <ri(s)>s<rj(s)>s−1, (4) where ri(s) is the mean ﬁring rate of cell ito stimulus s, and <· · ·>sdenotes an average across stimuli. These are scaled correlation den sities ranging from -1 to inﬁnity, which remain ﬁnite as t→0. Positive values of the correlation coeﬃ- cients indicate positive correlation, and negative values indicate anti-correlation. Under the assumption that the probabilities of neuronal ﬁri ng conditional upon the ﬁring of other neurons are non-divergent, the texpansion of response 1The additional temporal information contained in the spike times is studied in [24]probabilities becomes an expansion in the total number of sp ikes emitted by the population in response to a stimulus. The probabilities of u p to two spikes being emitted are calculated and inserted into the expression for information. This yields for the information derivatives It=C/summationdisplay i=1/angbracketleftbigg ri(s)log2ri(s) /angbracketleftri(s′)/angbracketrights′/angbracketrightbigg s(5) Itt=1 ln 2C/summationdisplay i=1C/summationdisplay j=1/angbracketleftri(s)/angbracketrights/angbracketleftrj(s)/angbracketrights/bracketleftbigg νij+ (1 + νij)ln(1 1 +νij)/bracketrightbigg +C/summationdisplay i=1C/summationdisplay j=1/bracketleftbigg /angbracketleftri(s)rj(s)γij(s)/angbracketrights/bracketrightbigg log2(1 1 +νij) +C/summationdisplay i=1C/summationdisplay j=1/angbracketleftbigg ri(s)rj(s)(1 + γij(s))log2/bracketleftbigg(1 +γij(s))/angbracketleftri(s′)rj(s′)/angbracketrights′ /angbracketleftri(s′)rj(s′)(1 + γij(s′))/angbracketrights′/bracketrightbigg/angbracketrightbigg s.(6) The ﬁrst of these terms is all that survives if there is no nois e correlation at all. Thus the rate component of the information is given by the sum of It(which is always greater than or equal to zero) and of the ﬁrst term of Itt(which is instead always less than or equal to zero). The second term is non-zero if there is some correlation in the variance to a given stimulus, even if it is independent of which stimulus is present; this term thus represents the con tribution of stimulus- independent noise correlation to the information. The third component of Itt is non-negative, and it represents the contribution of stimulus-modulated noise correlation , as it becomes non-zero only for stimulus-dependent correl ations. We refer to these last two terms of Itttogether as the correlational components of the information. In any practical measurement of these formulae, estimates o f ﬁnite sampling bias must be subtracted from the individual components. Ana lytical expressions for the bias of each component are derived in the online appen dix of [23]. 5 Correlations and fast information processing The results reported above for the information derivatives show that the in- stantaneous rate of information transmission (related to t he leading order con- tribution to the information) depends only upon the ﬁring ra tes. Correlations contribute to information transmission, but they play only a second order role. This has interesting implications for the neural code, that we develop further here. It was argued [25] that, since the response of cortical neuro ns is so variable, rapid information transmission must imply redundancy (i.e . transmitting several copies of the same message). In other words, it should necess ary to average away the large observed variability of individual interspike in tervals s by replicating the signal through many similar neurons in order to ensure re liability in shorttimes. Our result, eq. (6), shows that to have a high informat ion rate, it is enough that each cell conveys some information about the sti muli (because the rate of the information transmitted by the population is the sum of all single cell contributions); therefore we conclude that it is not necess ary to transmit many copies of the same signal to ensure rapidity. Also, since ﬁring rates convey the main component of informa tion, corre- lations are likely to play a minor role in timescales of the or der of 20-50 ms, in which much information is transmitted in the cortex. As an example, Fig. 2 shows the information conveyed by a population of simulate d Integrate and Fire neurons, which share a large proportion (30%) of their a ﬀerents (see [23] for details of the neuronal model used). It can be seen that, d espite the strong correlations between the cells in the ensemble correlation s play only a minor role with respect to ﬁring rates. To model a situation where stimulus dependent correlations conveyed in- formation, we generated simulated data using the Integrate -and-Fire model for another quintuplet of cells which had a stimulus dependent f raction of common input. This might correspond to a situation where transient ly participate in dif- ferent neuronal assemblies, depending on stimulus conditi on. This is therefore a case that might be found if the binding-by-synchrony theory is correct. There were ten stimuli in the sample. The spike emission rate was co nstant (20 Hz) across stimuli. One of the stimuli resulted in independent i nput to each of the model cell, whereas each of the other nine stimuli resulted i n an increase (to 90%) in the amount of shared input between one pair of cells. T he pair was chosen at random from the ensemble such that each stimulus re sulted in a dif- ferent pair being correlated The change in responses of one s uch pair of cells to changes in the amount of common input is shown in Fig. 3a. The u pper panel of Fig. 3a shows the fraction of shared connections as a funct ion of time; the central and lower panel of Fig. 3a show the resulting membran e potentials and spike trains from the pair of neurons. This cross-correlati on is also evident in the cross-correlograms shown in Fig. 3b. The results for the inf ormation are given in Fig. 3c: all terms but the third of Ittare essentially zero, and information transmission is in this case almost entirely due to stimulus -dependent correla- tions. This shows that the short time window series expansio n pursued here is able to pick up the right encoding mechanisms used by the set o f cells. Therefore it is a reliable method for quantifying the information carr ied by the correlation of ﬁring of small populations of cells recorded from the cent ral nervous system in vivo . Another point that is worth observing is that Fig. 3c also sh ows that the total amount of information that could be conveyed, even with this much shared input, was modest in comparison to that conveyed by ra tes dependent on the stimuli, at the same mean ﬁring rate. This again illustra tes that correlations typically convey less information than what can be normally achieved by rate modulations only. Therefore they are likely to be a secondar y coding mecha- nism when information is processed in time scales of the orde r of one interspike interval.a02040608010000.511.5 Time window (ms)Information (bits)Total information Rate only Correlation (stim. indep.) Correlation (stim. dep.) b−50 0 500580 Lag (ms)No. events Fig.2. (a) The short-timescale information components for a set of 5 simu- lated neurons sharing 30% of their inputs. (b) A typical exam ple of the cross- correlogram between two of the simulated neurons. Despite o f the strong cor- relation between neurons, the impact of the cross correlati ons on information transmission is minimal.a0120 mV 02004006008001000 Time (ms)20 mV b0200 No. events −50 0 500640 Lag (ms)No. events c02040608010000.050.1 Time window (ms)Information (bits) Fig.3. A situation in which the stimulus dependent correlational c omponent dominates: with a ﬁxed mean ﬁring rate, two of the ﬁve simulat ed cells (chosen randomly for that stimulus) increase their correlation by i ncreasing the number of shared connections while the other two remained randomly correlated. The eﬀect of this on cell spiking activity is shown in (a): upper p anel shows the fraction of shared connections, while central and lower pan els of (a) show the membrane potential and spike emission of the simulated cell s. (b) shows the cross-correlograms corresponding to the low and high corre lation states. The result of this is seen in (c): information due to correlation s, although modest in magnitude, in this demonstration dominates the total infor mation.6 Optimality of correlational encoding In the preceding sections we have shown that the correlation al component is only second order in the short time limit, essentially becau se the probability of emission of pairs of spikes, and the reliability of this proc ess, are much smaller than the corresponding quantities for single spikes. For th is reason, one can expect a correlational code to carry appreciable informati on only when it is eﬃcient , i.e. when each correlated spike pair carries as much inform ation as possible. In this section we investigate the statistical conditions t hat have to be satis- ﬁed by a correlational code in order to be eﬃcient in the short time limit. If the population code is purely correlational (i.e. the ﬁring rat es are not modulated at all by the stimuli), then it is possible to show that the mea n information per coincidence Ψcarried by a pair of cells (obtained dividing the total infor mation by the mean number of observed coincidences) is bounded only by the sparseness of the distribution of coincident ﬁring across stimuli α: 0≤Ψ≤log2(1/α) (7) The maximal (most eﬃcient) value of information per coincid enceΨmax= log2(1/α) is reached by a binary distribution of correlations across stimuli, with a fraction of stimuli αeliciting positively correlated ﬁring, and the other 1 −α stimuli eliciting fully anti-correlated ﬁring (i.e. coinc ident ﬁring is never observed when presenting one of the latter stimuli). Nearly uniform, or strongly unimodal distributions of correlations across stimuli would give po or information, Ψ∼0. By analyzing Eq. (7), it is easy to realize that there are two s tatistical require- ments that are necessary to achieve high values of informati on per coincidence. The ﬁrst one is that the correlational code should be em spars e (i.e. the frac- tion of stimuli leading to a “high correlation state” should be low). The sparser the code, the more information per coincidence can be transm itted. The second important factor for fast and eﬃcient transmission of corre lational information, is that the low correlational state must be strongly anti-correlated in order to achieve an information per coincidence close to its maximum log2(1/α). In fact correlations in short times have ﬂuctuations that may be big compared with their mean value, and therefore for any observer it is diﬃcult to un derstand in less than one ISI if an observed coincidence is due to chance or neu ronal interaction. This is why low correlational states with no coincidences ar e so helpful in trans- mitting information. We note here that states of nearly comp lete anticorrelation have never been observed in the brain. Therefore the “low sta te correlational state” of a realistic correlational assembly should be the “ random correlation state” (i.e. the state in which the number of coincident spik es is on average that expected by chance). We have quantiﬁed the reduction in the information per coinc idence, com- pared to its maximum Ψmax, that arises as a consequence of the presence of the random correlation state. Fig. 4 plots the ratio between the information per coincidence carried when the “low correlation state” is ran dom and the optimalamount of information per coincidence log2(1/α) obtained when the low correla- tion state is totally anticorrelated. The plot is shown as a f unction of the fraction αof stimuli eliciting a “highly correlated state”. Fig. 4 sho ws clearly that, if the “low correlation state” of the assembly elicits uncorrelat ed ﬁring, then the in- formation per coincidence is far from its maximum, unless th e correlation in the “high state” is extremely high and the correlational code is not sparse at all. However, in which case the information per coincidence is ve ry low anyway (see eq. (7)). Therefore correlational assemblies in the brain, if any, ar e likely to be ineﬃ- cient in the short time limit. This consideration further li mits the possible role played by correlations in fast information encoding. 00.20.40.60.8100.20.40.60.81correlational assembly fraction of positively corr. stimuliefficiency of encodingγ = 0.5 γ = 1 γ = 3 γ = 10 Fig.4. The ratio between the information per coincidence carried b y a binary correlational encoder with a fraction of stimuli eliciting positive correlation γ and the other stimuli eliciting no correlation, and the opti mal information per coincidence carried in the same situation, but with full ant icorrelation in the “low correlation state”. This ratio is plotted, for diﬀeren t values of the strength γof the “high correlation state”, as a function of the fractio n of stimuli eliciting positive correlation. 7 Discussion If cells participate in context-dependent correlational a ssemblies [2], then a signif- icant amount of information should be found in the third comp onent of Ittwhen analysing data obtained from the appropriate experiments. The series expansion approach thus enables the testing of hypotheses about the ro le of correlations in solving the binding problem, as opposed to other solutions, and about informa- tion coding in general. Data analyses based on the time-expa nsion approach havethe potential to elucidate the role of correlations in the en coding of information by cortical neurons. It is worth noticing that the formalism presented here evalu ates the the in- formation contained in the neuronal responses themselves, it does not make assumptions about the system that is going to read the code. F or this reason, the information computed “directly” from neuronal respons es is an upper bound to what any type of decoder can extract from the responses the mselves. There- fore it is termed the information that an “ideal observer” ca n extract [22]. Of course, the relative contribution of rate and synchrony mod ulations to infor- mation transmission will depend on the speciﬁc read-out mec hanism used by a downstream neural system that listens to the neuronal code . However, if the information that an ideal observer is able to extract from th e synchrony code is small, as the mathematical analysis indicates for the fast i nformation processing limit, one can be sure that any decoding device cannot extrac t more information in the synchrony than that small amount evaluated from the re sponses. Whether this small amount is suﬃcient to support computatio nal processes such as ﬁgure-ground segregation remains to be seen, and dep ends upon how it scales empirically with the number of receptive ﬁelds exa mined. Ultimately, as suggested by [3], the only way we will achieve any degree of conﬁdence in a proposed solution to the binding problem will be to study re cordings made from a monkey trained to make behavioural responses accordi ng to whether individual features are bound to particular objects. The in formation theoretic approach described here would be a natural way to analyse suc h data. In conclusion, the methodology presented here can provide i nteresting and reliable bounds on the role of synchrony on cortical informa tion encoding, and we believe that its application to neurophysiological expe riments will advance our understanding of the functional interpretation of sync hronous activity in the cerebral cortex. 8 Acknowledgements We would particularly like to thank Alessandro Treves and Ma lcolm Young for useful discussions relating to this work. References 1. C. von der Malsburg. Binding in models of perception and br ain function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , 5:520–526, 1995. 2. W. Singer, A. K. Engel, A. K. Kreiter, M. H. J. Munk, S. Neuen schwander, and P. Roelfsema. Neuronal assemblies: necessity, signature a nd detectability. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 1:252–261, 1997. 3. M. N. Shadlen and J. A. Movshon. Synchrony unbound: a criti cal evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron , 24(1):67–77, 111–25, September 1999. 4. G. M. Ghose and J. Maunsell. Specialized representations in visual cortex: a role for binding? Neuron , 24(1):79–85, 111–25, September 1999.5. M. P. Young and S. Yamane. Sparse population coding of face s in the inferotem- poral cortex. Science , 256:1327–1331, 1992. 6. H. D. R. Golledge, C. C. Hilgetag, and M. J. Tovee. A solutio n to the binding problem? information processing. Curr Biol , 6(9):1092–5, Sep 1 1996. 7. A. M. H. J. Aertsen, G. L. Gerstein, M. K. Habib, and G. Palm. Dynamics of neuronal ﬁring correlation: modulation of “eﬀective con nectivity”. Journal of Neurophysiology , 61:900–917, 1989. 8. E. D. Adrian. The impulses produced by sensory nerve endin gs: Part I. J. Physiol. (Lond.) , 61:49–72, 1926. 9. K.H. Britten, M. N. Shadlen, W. T. Newsome, and J. A. Movsho n. The analysis of visual-motion - a comparison of neuronal and psychophysi cal performance. J. Neurosci. , 12:4745–4765, 1988. 10. M. N. Shadlen and W. T. Newsome. Motion perception: seein g and deciding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 93(2):628–33, Jan 23 1996. 11. C. E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. AT&T Bell Labs. Tech. J., 27:379–423, 1948. 12. M. J. Tov´ ee, E. T. Rolls, A. Treves, and R. P. Bellis. Info rmation encoding and the response of single neurons in the primate temporal visual co rtex.J. Neurophysiol. , 70:640–654, 1993. 13. S. Thorpe, D. Fize, and C. Marlot. Speed of processing in t he human visual system. Nature , 381:520–522, 1996. 14. E. T. Rolls, M.J. Tovee, and S. Panzeri. The neurophysiol ogy of backward visual masking: Information analysis. J. Cognitive Neurosci. , 11:335–346, 1999. 15. C. M. Gray, A. K. Engel, P. K¨ onig, and W. Singer. Synchron ization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat striate cortex: Temporal propert ies.Visual Neuroscience , 8:337–347, 1992. 16. A. K. Kreiter and W. Singer. Stimulus-dependent synchro nization of neuronal re- sponses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey. J Neurosci , 16(7):2381– 96, Apr 1 1996. 17. P. K¨ onig, A. K. Engel, and W. Singer. Relation between os cillatory activity and long-range synchronization in cat visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 92:290–294, 1995. 18. S. C. de Oliveira, A. Thiele, and K. P. Hoﬀmann. Synchroni zation of neuronal activity during stimulus expectation in a direction discri mination task. J Neurosci , 17(23):9248–60, Dec 1 1997. 19. P. Konig, A. K. Engel, and W. Singer. Relation between osc illatory activity and long-range synchronization in cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 92(1):290–4, Jan 3 1995. 20. Y. Hata, T. Tsumoto, H. Sato, and H. Tamura. Horizontal in teractions between visual cortical neurones studied by cross-correlation ana lysis in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) , 441:593–614, September 1991. 21. F. Rieke, D. Warland, R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and W . Bialek. Spikes: exploring the neural code . MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996. 22. A. Borst and F. E. Theunissen. Information theory and neu ral coding. Nat Neu- rosci, 2(11):947–57, November 1999. 23. S. Panzeri, S. R. Schultz, A. Treves, and E. T. Rolls. Corr elations and the encoding of information in the nervous system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B , 266:1001–1012, 1999. 24. S. Panzeri and S. R. Schultz. A uniﬁed approach to the stud y of temporal, corre- lational and rate coding. Neural Computation, in press , 2000.25. M. N. Shadlen and W. T. Newsome. The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation and coding. J. Neurosci. , 18(10):3870– 3896, 1998.
arXiv:physics/0006082v1 [physics.comp-ph] 30 Jun 2000Higher Order Force Gradient Symplectic Algorithms Siu A. Chin and Donald W. Kidwell∗ Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Tex as A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (March 14, 2011) Abstract We show that a recently discovered fourth order symplectic a lgorithm, which requires one evaluation of force gradient in addition to three evalua- tions of the force, when iterated to higher order, yielded al gorithms that are far superior to similarly iterated higher order algorithms based on the stan- dard Forest-Ruth algorithm. We gauge the accuracy of each al gorithm by comparing the step-size independent error functions assoc iated with energy conservation and the rotation of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz ve ctor when solv- ing a highly eccentric Kepler problem. For orders 6, 8, 10 and 12, the new algorithms are approximately a factor of 103, 104, 104and 105better. Typeset using REVT EX ∗Present address: Candescent Technologies, 6580 Via Del Oro , San Jose, CA 95119 1I. INTRODUCTION Symplectic algorithms [1,2] for solving classical dynamic al problems exactly conserve all Poincar´ e invariants. For periodic orbits, the errors i n energy conservation are bounded and periodic. This is in sharp contrast to Runge-Kutta type a lgorithms, whose energy error increases linearly with integration time, even for periodi c orbits [3,4]. Thus, symplectic algo- rithms are ideal for long time integration of equations of mo tion in problems of astrophysical interest [5]. For long time integrations, higher order algo rithms are desirable because they permit the use of larger time steps. Symplectic algorithms a re also advantageous in that higher order algorithms can be systematically generated fr om any low, even order algorithm [6–8]. In this work, we will show that higher order algorithm s generated by a fourth order force gradient symplectic algorithm [9], have energy error s that are several orders of mag- nitude smaller than existing symplectic algorithms of the s ame order. For completeness, we will brieﬂy summarize the operator derivation of symplec tic algorithms and their higher order construction in Section II. While the materials in thi s section are not new, we be- lieve that we have restated Creutz’ and Gockach’s [6] triple t construction of higher order algorithms in its most transparent setting. In sections III and IV we recall force gradient algorithms and discuss two distinct ways of gauging the erro rs of an algorithm when solving the Kepler problem. We present our results and conclusions i n Sections V and VI. II. OPERATOR FACTORIZATION AND HIGHER ORDER CONSTRUCTIONS After a tortuous start [10,11], symplectic algorithms can b e derived most simply on the basis of operator decomposition or factorization. For any d ynamical variable W(qi, pi), its time evolution is given by the Poisson bracket, d dtW(qi, pi) ={W, H} ≡/summationdisplay i/parenleftBig∂W ∂qi∂H ∂pi−∂W ∂pi∂H ∂qi/parenrightBig . (1) If the Hamiltonian is of the form, 2H(p, q) =1 2/summationdisplay ip2 i+V({qi}), (2) the evolution equation (1) can be written as an operator equa tion dW dt=/summationdisplay i/parenleftBig pi∂ ∂qi+Fi∂ ∂pi/parenrightBig W, (3) with formal solution W(t) = et(T+V)W(0), (4) where TandVare ﬁrst order diﬀerential operators deﬁned by T≡/summationdisplay ipi∂ ∂qi, V ≡/summationdisplay iFi∂ ∂pi. (5) Their exponentiations, eǫTand eǫV, are displacement operators which displace qiandpi forward in time via qi→qi+ǫpiand pi→pi+ǫFi. (6) Thus, if eǫ(T+V)can be factorized into products of the displacement operato rs eǫTand eǫV, each such factorization gives rise to an algorithm for evolv ing the system forward in time. For example, the second order factorization T2(ǫ)≡e1 2ǫTeǫVe1 2ǫT= exp[ ǫ(T+V) +ǫ3C+ +O(ǫ5)· · ·], (7) corresponds to the second order algorithm q1=q0+1 2ǫp0, p1=p0+ǫF(q1), q2=q1+1 2ǫp1, (8) where q0,p0andq2,p1are the initial and ﬁnal states of the algorithm respectivel y. This second order symplectic algorithm only requires one evalua tion of the force. The bilaterally symmetric form of T2(ǫ) automatically guarantees that it is time- reversible , 3T2(−ǫ)T2(ǫ) = 1, (9) and implies that log( T2) can only be an odd function of ǫ, as indicated in (7). The explicit form of the operator Cis not needed for our present discussion. Consider now the the symmetric triple product T2(δ)T2(−sδ)T2(δ) = exp[(2 −s)δ(T+V) + (2 −s3)δ3C+O(δ5) +· · ·]. (10) This algorithm evolves the system forward for time δ, backward for time sδand forward again for time δ. Since it is manifestly time-reversible, its error terms mu st be odd powers of δonly. Morever, its leading ﬁrst and third order terms can only be th e sum of the ﬁrst and third order terms of each constituent algorithm as indicated. Thi s is because non-additive terms must come from commutators of operators and the lowest order non-vanishing commutator has to have two ﬁrst order terms and one third order term, whic h is ﬁfth order. The form of (10) naturally suggests that the third order error term can b e made to vanish by choosing s= 21/3. (11) Thus if we now rescale δback to the standard step size by setting ǫ= (2−s)δ, the resulting triplet product would be correct to 4th order, T4≡ T2/parenleftBigǫ 2−s/parenrightBig T2/parenleftBig−s ǫ 2−s/parenrightBig T2/parenleftBigǫ 2−s/parenrightBig = exp[ ǫ(T+V) +O(ǫ5) +· · ·]. (12) Expanding out the T2’s gives the explicit form: T4≡ea1ǫTeb1ǫVea2ǫTeb2ǫVea2ǫTeb1ǫVea1ǫT(13) where, by inspection a1=1 21 2−s, a 2=−1 2s−1 2−s, b 1=1 2−s,and b2=−s 2−s. (14) This fourth order symplectic algorithm was apparently obta ined by E. Forest in 1987. How- ever, its original derivation was very complicated and was n ot published with Ruth [11] until 1990. During this period many groups, including Campo strini and Rossi [12] in 1990, 4Candy and Rozmous [13] in 1991, independently published the same algorithm. Our dis- cussion followed the earliest published derivation of this algorithm by Creutz and Gocksch [6] in 1989. After they were informed of this algorithm by Cam postrini, they provided the triplet construction and generalized it to higher order. Th e triplet construction was also independently published by Suzuki [7] and Yoshida [8] in 199 0. Higher order algorithms can be obtained by repeating this co nstruction. Starting with anynth order symmetric algorithm, Tn(ǫ) = exp[ ǫ(T+V) +ǫ(n+1)D+· · ·], (15) the triplet product Tn(δ)Tn(−sδ)Tn(δ) = exp[(2 −s)δ(T+V) + (2 −sn+1)δn+1D+O(δn+3) +· · ·],(16) will be of order ( n+ 2) if we choose s= 21/(n+1)(17) and renormalize δ=ǫ/(2−s) as before. III. FORCE GRADIENT ALGORITHMS The method of operator factorization can be applied to many d iﬀerent classes of evolution equations. However, the triplet concatenations with a nega tive time step are a special construction with more limited applicability. For example , one cannot use it to derive similar Diﬀusion Monte Carlo or ﬁnite temperature path integral alg orithms, because one cannot simulate diﬀusion backward in time nor sample conﬁguration s with negative temperatures. The triplet construction is a special example of Suzuki’s [1 4] general proof that, beyond second order, it is impossible to factorize eǫ(T+V)only into products of eǫT’s and eǫV’s without introducing negative time steps. For symplectic al gorithms this means that one can never develop a purely positive time step fourth order al gorithm by evaluating only the force. For many years the Forest-Ruth (FR) algorithm was the only known fourth 5order symplectic algorithm. Recently, a deeper understand ing of the operator factorization process has yielded three new symplectic algorithms [9] all with purely positive time steps. These new algorithms circumvented Suzuki’s no-go theorem b y evaluating the force and its gradient. This corresponds to factorizing eǫ(T+V)in terms of operators T,V, and the commutator [ V,[T, V]]. The latter corresponds to [V,[T, V]] = 2Fj∂Fi ∂qj∂ ∂pi=∇i\|F\|2∂ ∂pi, (18) which is the gradient of the squared magnitude of the force. O f the three algorithms derived by Chin [9], algorithm C is particularly outstanding and cor responds to the factorization eǫ(T+V)= eǫ1 6Teǫ3 8Veǫ1 3Teǫ1 4/tildewideVeǫ1 3Teǫ3 8Veǫ1 6T+O(ǫ5). (19) where /tildewideV=V+1 48ǫ2[V,[T, V]]. (20) The algorithm itself can be read oﬀ directly as q1=q0+1 6ǫp0, p1=p0+3 8ǫF(q1) q2=q1+1 3ǫp1 p2=p1+1 4ǫ/bracketleftBig F(q2) +1 48ǫ2∇\|F(q2)\|2/bracketrightBig (21) q3=q2+1 3ǫp2 p3=p2+3 8ǫF(q3) q4=q3+1 6ǫp3. In [9] it was shown that the maximum energy error for this algo rithm, when used to solve Kepler’s problem, is smaller than that of the FR algorithm by a factor of 80. At the moment there is no general method for constructing higher order alg orithms with only positive time steps. It is not even known whether a positive time step 6th or der algorithm exists. Thus, 6beyond 4th order the triplet contruction is still the only sy stematic way of generating higher order algorithms. In this work we show that intrinsic error f unctions associated with higher order algorithms generated from Chin’s algorithm C are far s maller than those generated from the FR algorithm. IV. THE ENERGY AND THE LRL VECTOR We gauge the numerical eﬀectiveness of each algorithm by sol ving the two dimensional Kepler problem d2q dt2=−q q3, (22) with initial conditions q0= (10,0) and p0= (0,1/10). The resulting highly eccentric (e=0.9) orbit provides a non-trivial testing ground for trajectory integration. A symmetric nth order symplectic algorithm evolves this system forward i n time with Hamiltonian H(p,q) =H0(p,q) +ǫnHn(p,q) +O(ǫn+2), (23) which deviates from the exact Hamiltonian H0(p,q) =1 2p2−1/\|q\|by an error term ǫnHn(p,q) as indicated. To gauge the intrinsic merit of each algorith m we compare their step-size independent error coeﬃcient Hn(p,q). This can be extracted numerically as fol- lows. Let’s start the system with total energy E0=H0(p(0),q(0)). Since the Hamiltonian (23) is conserved by the algorithm, we have E0=H0(p(t),q(t)) +ǫnHn(p(t),q(t)) +O(ǫn+2) (24) Denoting E(t)≡H0(p(t),q(t)) and Hn(t) =Hn(p(t),q(t)), we therefore have Hn(t) =−lim ǫ→01 ǫn/bracketleftBig E(t)−E0/bracketrightBig . (25) Energy conservation does not directly measure how well the o rbit is determined. When the time step is not too small, a very noticeable error is that the orbit precesses. One can, 7but it is tedious, directly monitor this orbital precession [4]. It is more expedient to follow the rotation of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz (LRL) vector: A=p×L−ˆr. (26) When the orbit is exact the LRL vector is constant, pointing a long the semi-major axis of the orbit. When the orbit precesses the LRL vector rotates co rrespondingly. For an nth order algorithm, dA dt=ǫn/summationdisplay i/parenleftBig∂A ∂qi∂Hn ∂pi−∂A ∂pi∂Hn ∂qi/parenrightBig . (27) Thus, the rate of change of each component of the LRL vector is of order ǫn. The components themselves, which are time integrals of the above modulo a co nstant term, must also be of order ǫn. Let the LRL vector initially be of length A0and lie along the x-axis, then we have Ax(t)=A0+ǫnAnx(t) +O(ǫn+2), (28) Ay(t)=ǫnAny(t) +O(ǫn+2). (29) Since the square of the LRL vector is related to the energy by A2= 2L2E+ 1, (30) the longitudinal deviation coeﬃcient Anx(t) is related to the energy error coeﬃcient by Anx(t) =1 ǫnL2 A0(E(t)−E0) =−L2 A0Hn(t), (31) which gives no new information. The perpendicular deviatio n coeﬃcient Any(t) is best measured in terms of the rotation angle: θ(t) = tan−1/bracketleftbiggAy(t) Ax(t)/bracketrightbigg =ǫn/bracketleftbiggAny(t) A0/bracketrightbigg +· · · (32) To compare algorithms we again extract and compare their rot ation error coeﬃcient function θn(t) =Any(t)/A0via θn(t) = lim ǫ→01 ǫnθ(t). (33) Since this rotational angle is related to some integral of th e energy error function, it is a better measure of the overall error of the algorithm. 8V. RESULTS OF COMPARING HIGHER ORDER ALGORITHMS By use of the triplet construction, we generated 6th, 8th, 10 th, and 12th order algorithms from both the Forest-Ruth and Chin’s C algorithm. We compute d the fractional energy deviation, which is just the negative of the energy error coe ﬃcient normalized by the initial energy, lim ǫ→01 ǫn/bracketleftBigE(t) E0−1/bracketrightBig =−Hn(t) E0. (34) Smaller and smaller time steps ǫare used until the extracted coeﬃcient function is stablize d independent of the time step size. This typically occurs in t he neighborhood of ǫ=P/5000, where P is the period of the orbit. Fig.1 compares the (negative) normalized error coeﬃcient f unctions for the 4th order Runge-Kutta, Forest-Ruth and Chin’s C algorithms over one p eriod of the orbit. The error function for the two symplectic algorithms are substantial only near mid period when the particle is at its closest approach to the attractive center . For symplectic algorithms energy is conserved over one period, or its non-conservation is per iodic. Its average energy error is bounded and constant as a function of time. In contrast, the 4 th order Runge-Kutta energy error function is an irreversible, step-like function over one period. Each successive period will increase the error by the same amount resulting in a line arly rising, staircase-like error function in time. As noted earlier, the maximum error in Chin ’s algorithm C is smaller than that of the FR algorithm by a factor of 80. However, this error height comparison at one point is not meaningful. It is better to compare the energy er ror averaged over one period. This would require the integral of the energy error function . On this basis algorithm C will be better still. While the energy error integral can be done, the same goal can be achieved by monitoring the rotation of the LRL vector. Fig.2 shows the corresponding error coeﬃcient functions of the rotational angle of the LRL vector. After each period, the algorithms rotate the LRL vector by a deﬁnite amount. The error coeﬃcient provides an intrinsic, step-size indep endent way of comparing this 9rotation. In Fig.2 the rotated angle produced by algorithm C is too small to be visible when plotted on the same scale as the other algorithms. The insert gives an enlargement of the details. The rotational angle of the LRL vector appears to be related to some integral of energy error function. Although we have not been able to demo nstrate this analytically, numerical integration of the energy error function does giv e a function similiar in shape to the angle coeﬃcient function, having the same numbers of m axima and minima. For the Runge-Kutta, Forest-Ruth and Chin’s C 4th order algorit hms, the magnitudes of this rotation coﬃcient after one period are 2.666, 10.860, and 0. 004 respectively. On this basis, algorithm C is better than FR by a factor of ≈3000. When the orbit is integrated over many periods the rotational angle from symplectic algorithms in creases linearly in a staircase-like manner with time. In contrast, the rotational angle of the Ru nge-Kutta algorithm shows a quadratic increase over long times, such as a few thousand p eriods. This result is easy to understand if the rotational angle is related to some inte gral of the energy error. This quadratic increase in the rotation angle of the LRL vector cl early mirrors the quadratic increase in phase error of the Runge-Kutta algorithm, as dis cussed by Gladman, Duncan and Candy [4]. Fig.3 and Fig.4 show the results when both the Forest-Ruth an d Chin’s C algorithms are iterated to 6th order by the triplet product construction. I nserts in both detail algorithm C’s intricate structure. As an added comparison we also incl uded results for Yoshida’s [8] 6th order algorithm A, which is a product of 7 second order alg orithms (8), some with negative time steps. For Yoshida’s algorithm, Forest-Ruth and Chin’s C algorithm in 6th order, the magnitudes of the rotation coﬃcients after one pe riod are 11.44, 335.1, and 0.1156 respectively. Yoshida’s algorithm is a factor of 30 better t han FR, but algorithm C is a factor of 3000 better. Note that if the energy error function is rela ted to the diﬀerential of the the angle error function, the zeros of the former would correspo nd to the extrema of the latter. The four zero crossings of algorithm C’s energy error functi on are clearly reﬂected in the two maxima and two minima of the corresponding angle error fu nction. Fig.5 and Fig.6 give results for the 8th order iterated algor ithms based on the Forest- 10Ruth and Chin’s C algorithm. The magnitudes of the angle erro r coeﬃcients are 1 .386×104 and 0.4532 respectively, giving a ratio of approximately 3 ×104. Algorithm C retains its characteristic shape in both the energy and the angle error f unction. Fig.7 and Fig.8 give the corresponding results for the iterated 10th order algor ithms. Here the intricate structure in the C algorithm is beginning to be washed out. At this high o rder, quadruple numeric precision is necessary to extract these coeﬃcient function s smoothly. The magnitudes of the angle error coeﬃcients are now 7 .141×105and 17 .89 respectively, giving a ratio of 4×104. Fig.9 and Fig.10 give similar results for the 12th order alg orithms. At this point all structures in the C algorithm are gone. The magnitudes of the angle error coeﬃcients are now 4 .473×107and 427 .5 respectively, giving a ratio of 1 .05×105. The iteration of algorithms A and B of Chin [9] also produced r esults that are better than FR based algorithms. However, we do not detail their res ults here because they are at least one or two orders of magnitude inferior to algorithm C. VI. CONCULSIONS In this work we have shown that higher order force gradient sy mplectic algorithms appear to be superior to non-gradient symplectic alogorithms as me asured by eneregy conservation and the rotation of the LRL vector. While it has been shown ear lier that 4th order force gradient algorithms have smaller energy error coeﬃcients [ 9], it was not known that this advantage would mulitply dramatically when algorithms are iterated to higher orders. The conclusion that one should draw may not be that force gradien t algorithms are better, but that higher order non-gradient algorithms are far from opti mal. Secondly, we suggested that the rotation of the LRL vector gives an intergrated measure o f an algorithm’s merit when tested on the Kepler problem. The high accuracy of this class of algorithms seemed ideal fo r long time integration of few-body problems, such as that of the solar system [5]. For s uch few-body problems, the evaluation of the force gradient is not excessively diﬃcult . It would be useful to examine 11the merit of this class of algorithms in more physical applic ations. The distinct advantage uncovered in this work, that it is better to iterate a 4th orde r algorithm with all positive time steps, gives further impetus to search for an all positi ve time step 6th order symplectic algorithm. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was funded, in part, by the U. S. National Scien ce Foundation grants PHY-9512428, PHY-9870054 and DMR-9509743. 12REFERENCES [1]Numerical Hamiltonian Problems by J. Sanz-Serna and M. Calvo, Chapman & Hall London, 1994. [2] H. Yoshida, Celest. Mech. 56(1993) 27. [3] H. Kinoshita, H. Yoshida, an dH. Nakai, Celest. Mech. 50(1991)59-71. [4] B. Gladman, M. Duncan and J. Candy, Celest. Mech. 52(1991)221. [5] J. Wisdom and M. Holman, Astrophys. J., 102(1991)1528. [6] M. Creutz and A. Gocksch, Phys. Rev. Letts. 63(1989) 9. [7] M. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. A146 (1990)319. [8] H. Yoshida, Phys. Lett. A150 (1990)262. [9] S. A. Chin, Phys. Lett. A226 (1997) 344. [10] R. D. Ruth, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci, NS-30 (1983)2669. [11] E. Forest and R. D. Ruth, Physica D 43(1990) 105. [12] M. Campostrini and P. Rossi, Nucl. Phys. B329 (1990) 753. [13] J. Candy and W. Rozmus, J. Comp. Phys. 92(1991) 230. [14] M. Suzuki, J. Math. Phys. 32(1991)400. 13FIGURES 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.52-20-100102030 t/P(E/E0-1)/4RK4 FR C FIG. 1. The normalized energy deviation of a particle in a Kep lerian orbit, which measures the step-size independent energy error coeﬃcient −H4(p(t),q(t))/E0. P is the period of the elliptical orbit and ǫis the time step size. RK4, FR, and C denote results for the 4th order Runge-Kutta, Forest-Ruth, and Chin’s C algorithm respectively. The maxi mum deviations for algorithm FR and C are 21 and 0.27 respectively. 140.48 0.49 0.50 0.51-15-10-505 t/P/4RK4 FR C 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.52-0.050.000.05 FIG. 2. The step-size independent error coeﬃcient of the rot ation angle of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector for 4th order algorithms. The LR L vector rotates substantial only when the particle is near mid period, closest to the attracti ve center. The insert make visible the ﬁne structure produced by algorithm C. 150.48 0.49 0.50 0.510100200300400500 t/P(E/E0-1)/6FR C Y 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.52-0.50.00.5 FIG. 3. The normalized energy deviation for 6th order algori thms. RF and C denote 6th order algorithms generated by a triplet product of corresponding 4th algorithms in Fig.1. The insert makes visible the energy devivation of algorithm C, which is not visible in the bigger graph. The maximum deviations for algorithms FR, Y and C are 513, 13.6, a nd 0.74 respectively. 160.48 0.49 0.50 0.51-400-300-200-1000100 t/P/6FR C Y 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.520.000.100.20 FIG. 4. The step-size independent error coeﬃcient of the rot ation angle of the LRL vector for 6th order algorithms as described in Fig.3. The insert makes visible the minute rotation coeﬃcient produced by algorithm C. 170.48 0.49 0.50 0.51-510305103101031510320103 t/P(E/E0-1)/8FR C 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.520.01.0 FIG. 5. The normalized energy deviations for 8th order algor ithms, as generated by a triplet product of 6th order algorithm described in Fig.3. The inser t makes visible the minute energy deviation of algorithm C. 180.48 0.49 0.50 0.51-15103-10103-510305103 t/P/8FR C 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.52-0.40-0.200.00 FIG. 6. The step-size independent error coeﬃcient of the rot ation angle of the LRL vector for 8th order algorithms as described in Fig.5. In this order, th e algorithm C based algorithm begins to rotate in the same sense as the FR base algorithm. 190.48 0.49 0.50 0.5102105410561058105106 t/P(E/E0-1)/10FR C 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.5205101520 FIG. 7. The normalized energy deviations for 10th order algo rithms, as generated by a triplet product of 8th order algorithm described in Fig.5. The inser t shows that the characteristic oscil- lations of algorithm C are beginning to disappear. 200.48 0.49 0.50 0.51-8105-6105-4105-210502105 t/P/10FR C 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.52-15-10-505 FIG. 8. The step-size independent error coeﬃcient of the rot ation angle of the LRL vector for 10th order algorithms as described in Fig.7. The insert show s that the error coeﬃcient of algorithm C begins to look like that of the FR algorithm. 210.48 0.49 0.50 0.510210741076107 t/P(E/E0-1)/12FR C 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.520100200300400 FIG. 9. The normalized energy deviations for 12th order algo rithms, as generated by a triplet product of 10th order algorithm described in Fig.7. The inse rt shows that there is no longer any distinctive structure produced by algorithm C. 220.48 0.49 0.50 0.51-5107-4107-3107-2*107-1070107 t/P/12FR C 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.52-400-2000 FIG. 10. The step-size independent error coeﬃcient of the ro tation angle of the LRL vector for 12th order algorithms as described in Fig.9. The insert show s that both algorithms have converged to a similar step-like error function. 23
A new Loan – Stock Financial Instrument Alexander Morozovsky1,2 Bridge, 57/58 Floors, 2 World Trade Center, New York, NY 10048 E-mail: alex@nyc.bridge.com Phone: (212) 390-6126 Fax: (212) 390-6498 Rajan Narasimhan, Overture Computing Corp. Ste 203 Jersey City, NJ 07302 E-mail: rajan@overture-computing.com Phone: (201) 332 0700 Yuri Kholodenko, Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 - 6323 E-mail: kholoden@sas.upenn.edu Phone: (215) 898 - 7149 Abstract. A new financial instrument (a new kind of a loan) is introduced. The loan-stock instrument (LSI) combines fixed rate instruments (loans, etc.) with otherfinancial instruments that have higher volatilities and returns (stocks, mutual funds,currencies, derivatives, options, etc.). This new loan depends on the value of underlyingsecurity (for example, stock) in such a way that when underlying security increases, thevalue of loan decreases and backwards. The procedure to create a risk free portfolio and atechnique to fairly price the LSI is described. The philosophy behind this procedure isquite similar to the Black-Scholes formalism in option theory. Creation of the risk freeportfolio is possible because the change in the underlying security offsets the change inthe value of the loan (or the amount that the borrower has to repay). The new financialinstrument takes an advantage of the fact that on average the stock market grows in time.It is beneficial for both the borrower and the lender. The LSI is more attractive for theborrower than the traditional loan is due to the decrease in the amount that has to berepaid. This attractiveness constitutes the benefit for the lender in terms of the marketshare among the borrowers. In addition, the lender can charge the extra premium. 1 The ideas expressed in this article are the author’s only and do not necessarily correspond to the views of Bridge, Overture Computing Corp., or University of Pennsylvania. 2 Some material discussed in this article is protected by a pending patent, Serial number: 60/178,940, Filing date: 02-01-2000.2Introduction. There are many different financial instruments today that are used for different purposes. Stocks and bonds allow one to invest one’s capital and get a return on one’sinvestment. Loans allow a person to borrow capital for a cost (interest). The idea behind a bond is that it is a way for an investor to earn an interest on an investment for a certain period of time. The idea behind loans is opposite to that of bonds.Loans allow a person to borrow money for a fixed period of time. After/during thatperiod of time the borrower must return the entire borrowed amount (plus accumulatedinterest). Many calculations in the financial industry are done with, what is known as, the risk free interest rates. For example, the price of treasury bills or bonds is calculated onthe base of risk free interest rates. In stocks, unlike bonds, an investor gets a bigger return. These returns come in the form of dividends or appreciation in the value of the stock. Higher returns howevercome with a price: investment in stocks is characterized by higher risk Overview of the idea. In this communication we suggest a new financial instrument that leverages the higher returns possible with stocks, or stock-like instruments, to create a loan-likeinstrument that is beneficial for both lenders and borrowers. The lenders benefit fromhigher returns that are not accompanied by increased risk. The borrowers enjoy a lowercost of the loan that, however, might be associated with increased risk. We conceive the simplest form of the new financial instrument as follows. A lender (for example a bank) will give a borrower a certain amount in cash. At the sametime the lender will also buy a certain amount of stock or stock-like security (for examplea mutual fund). When the value of the underlying security increases the amount that theborrower has to repay correspondingly (see below) decreases compared to the amount tobe repaid when a traditional loan is employed. And vice versa, when the value of theunderlying security decreases the amount that the borrower has to repay correspondinglyincreases. The borrower will make periodic payments that will depend on the loanamount and the value of the underlying stock. On average the stock market always seemsto go up. Therefore, according to the described idea, the borrower will have to repay lessthan he/she would in a traditional loan situation. Thus the financial benefit of this newloan strategy for the borrower is obvious (at least on average). The financial benefit to thelender could come from an additional premium that the lender can charge from theborrower. The borrower's willingness to pay such an additional premium is due to thereduced repayment amount as described above. At the same time as we show below, thelender's market risk (risk of losing capital) could still be minimal and independent of theunderlying security value. This is achieved by constructing a risk free portfolio thatconsists of the loan and the proper amount of the underlying security. It is important tounderstand that financial benefits of both the lender and the borrower come from anadditional investment in a stock market that is associated with a particular loan and fromthe lender's ability to construct the risk free portfolio by properly balancing the relative3amounts of the loan and the underling security. The situation is quite similar to the situation that arises when a risk free portfolio (that consists of an option and anunderlying security) is created in option theory. We notice that financial instruments thatcould be used as the underlying security include, but are not limited to, stocks, genericmutual funds, mutual funds based on stock indices such as DJIA, currencies, differentkind of derivatives, like futures, forwards and different kind of options, etc. The pricingmodel outlined below is equally applicable to all these cases. The new LSI can be viewed as the instrument in which the lender invests in the stock market on behalf of the borrower. If so, one can ask, why wouldn’t the borrowerinvest for himself? The answer is very simple. The borrower does not have money to doso. To have money invested for him, the borrower has to pay to the lender in the form ofan additional premium to the lender. We will return to the question of this additionalpremium below. This new loan-stock instrument (LSI) must have the following properties in order to exist and be marketable: 1. The amount of debt should decrease with time faster than it would when a traditional loan is employed. If not, the customers will not be interested in theLSI. 2. The value of the LSI should depend on the value of the underlying security. 3. One should be able to create a risk-neutral portfolio on the basis of this LSI in order to price it (introduced security). In the most common model (absence of transaction costs, frictionless market, and so on) [1,2], the stock dynamic consists of two parts: Sdz Sdtσµ+ ==dS (1) Here S is the asset price. The first term describes predictable or deterministic return with µ being a measure of the average rate of growth of the asset price and dt is a small time interval. The second contribution ( σSdz) reflects the random change in the asset price with volatility σ and dz is a Wiener process. We intend to construct now the risk-neutral portfolio in such a way that it will not be affected by the stock value changes. The portfolio will consists of the loan P and a number of - ∆ of the underlying security: L = P - ∆S (2) The number ∆ has yet to be determined. This step is quite similar to construction of the portfolio from an option and some amount of the underlying security in option theory.Following the usual derivation of the Black – Scholes formula [1,2] one immediatelycould obtain: rPSPSSPrStP=∂∂+∂∂+∂∂ 22 22 21σ (3)4where r is the risk free interest rate. S represents an underlying security with a standard deviation σ. Here P is a function of S and t. Black and Scholes solved this equation for European put and call options. However this equation could be applied for any other security. The solution for calculation of Loan-Stock instrument. The value of the LSI introduced above depends on the value of the underlying security. As we have already mentioned the amount to be repaid by the borrowerdecreases when the value of the underlying security increases and vice versa. Differentfunctional forms of such dependence that would satisfy the Black – Scholes equation (3)can be considered. For example, the value of the loan can be expressed as: β−= StAqtSP) ( ),( (4) Here A is a constant that represents the value of the loan when S = 1. The term q(t) is calculated assuming arbitrage-free market conditions. The parameter β (the loan-stock correlation parameter) determines how sensitive the loan is to the changes of the underlying security value (SRI). For example, if β = 0.05, changes in S will affect P less than they would when β = 0.5. In the limit β = 0 the LSI reduces to a traditional loan that is not coupled to any underlying security. One way to calculate q(t) would be to assume that the underlying security could be modeled by a Wiener process. Substitution of P(S,t) from (4) into the Black – Scholesequation (3) immediately leads to the differential equation for q (t). The solution of the equation is straightforward and the result is: )( )(0) )1(21(2 tq etqtr r βββσ ++ −= (5) Note that in the limit of β = 0 the increase in the loan value follows ert, as it is expected for the traditional loan. For the newly introduced LSI however the correlation parameter β has to be chosen in accordance with the desired strength of the connection between the loan value and the value of the underlying security. For example, the lendermight want to have the value of the loan to decrease 10 % in response to a 100% increase in the value of the underlying security. It directly follows from (4) that the value of β = log 2(1/0.9) = 0.152 would satisfy this condition. A prime concern of the borrower, however, is how fast (on average) the loan value would decrease. Under thecircumstances, the answer of course depends on the parameters of the underlying securitydynamics. As we have noticed above (see (1)), the deterministic part of the return for the asset S that has an expected return µ=is described by µdt. Therefore, the average growth of S over time follows the simple rule: teStSµ 0 )(= (6)5It follows that on average it would take as long as τ = ln2/µ to have S increased 100% (that is twice). In complete analogy with the option theory it follows from the above consideration that the amount of the underlying security ( ∆) necessary to create a risk free portfolio is given by the rate of change of the loan value in respect to S: SP ∂∂=∆ , (7) Taking into account the connection between P(S,t) and S (formula (4)) this yields (, )PStSβ∆=− . The additional investment required to buy ∆ shares of the underlying security amounts to \| ∆\|=S = β=P. We notice that in all the formulas above the underlying asset price S can, as always, be modeled by the Poisson distribution or any otherstochastic model. We also notice that (4) is not the unique solution to the Black-Scholes equation (3). Other functional forms of the loan value dependence on the underlying security valueare possible. These other loan-security combinations will also behave as a new financialinstrument (LSI) described above. One additional example of the possible correlationbetween the values of the loan and the underlying security is given by: n mStBStAtSP) ( )(),( − = (8) Any such solution (including (4) and (8)) can be used to fairly price the LSI. However, the first suggested solution (4) is the simplest solution for the Black-Scholes equation (3)that describes the proposed instrument. A description of new security and relationship between suggested and existing instruments. Above we have introduced and described the new loan - stock financial instrument (LSI). Contrary to the traditional loan, the value of the LSI is coupled to (and therefore dependson) the value of an underlying stock (SRI). A borrower borrows from a lender a givenloan amount, based on the terms and conditions of the LSI. The borrower then makesperiodic payments based on the value of the underlying SRI and the amount borrowed.The lenders may choose to further insure themselves against possible default of theperiodic payments or the loan amount by asking the borrowers to get an insurance policy,or getting one themselves. Given the loan amount L and a SRI of value S one can createthe LSI using any solution to the equation (3) that acts like the new financial instrumentjust described. The LSI is a kind of a negative security that behaves like a SRI but has a negative value. Table 1 shows a simplified relationship between loans, bonds (FRI), SRIs (stocks)and their possible applications.6Table 1: Investment decisions made on the basis of interest rateInvestment decisions are made on the basis of expected return, volatility Positive SecurityTreasury Bonds, Corporate Bonds, bill etc. FRIIndividual Stocks, Stock Funds, Options, etc SRI Negative Security LoansNew Financial Instrument LSI Illustrative Example. In this section we provide a reader with an example that illustrates the idea of the new loan instrument (LSI). The parameters of the problem are assumed to be as follows: 1) The borrower requires a loan amount of $100,000. 2) β = 0.347. 3) µ = 0.2 (A historical expected return of the SRI is20%). 4) r = 0.1 (Risk free interest rate is10%). 5) σ = 0.1 (Historical Variance of the SRI). For simplicity we also assume that the borrower does not make any periodic payments. The results of the calculations are shown in Table 2. As usual, the amount owed whentraditional loan is employed follows e rt. The amount owed with the LSI is calculated based on the formulas (4) and (5). In agreement with the conditions of the example thecombination of normalization parameters (A, q(t 0), S 0) is chosen to satisfy the initial condition for P(S,t) to be $100,000 on the beginning date of the loan. The underlyingsecurity dynamic is assumed to be described by formula (6). (This of course is true onlyon average. In reality the stock value is a subject to stochastic fluctuations). Finally, the value of the stock part (column four in Table 2) is simply S -β. It also shows how much SRI the bank needs to hold to break even, i.e. to make the same amount of money that the bank would make if it held a risk free FRI for an amountequal to the sum of the loan amount and the value of the SRI.7Table 2. Years The amount owed with a traditional loan(FRI), $The amount owed with the (LSI),$ (Subject tostatistical fluctuations).Value of stock part 0 100000 100000 1.00 1 110517.09 106498.74 0.93 2 122140.28 113419.81 0.87 3 134985.88 120790.67 0.81 4 149182.47 128640.54 0.76 5 164872.13 137000.55 0.71 6 182211.88 145903.86 0.66 7 201375.27 155385.77 0.62 8 222554.09 165483.89 0.57 9 245960.31 176238.25 0.54 10 271828.18 187691.51 0.50 Under the assumption of the continuous re-balancing of the number of shares, the amount of money that the bank has (without additional premium) will be exactly thesame as the growth of a normal fixed rate loan. This is due to the fact that the change inthe underlying security will offset the change in the value of the new loan security (or theamount that the borrower has to repay). This means that if the underlying security priceincreases, the value of the new loan-security will decrease in such a way that the sum ofthe two amounts will grow exponentially in time with the same rate as the fixed rate loanwould. The opposite is also true. If the stock price decreases then the value of the newloan-security will increase in such a way that the sum will again grow in exactly the sameway as the traditional fixed rate loan would. However, a strategy for the bank to earn some additional return has to be specified. The lender proceeds as follows: 1. At the time when the loan is initiated the lender also buys some units of SRI’s (for example, shares of stock). The number of shares is determined from the formula (7).With the parameters described above and assuming the price of a share of the underlying stock to be just $1.00 one gets ∆ = 34700 with an additional investment of $34,700.00. 2. The lender periodically changes the number of shares depending on the value of the SRI. For example, the lender might want to recalculate the number of shares held(and therefore buy or sell some shares of stock) at the end of a certain period of time(a year for example) based on the value of the underlying stock at that time. 3. Based on the financial benefits of the new instrument for the borrower (Table 2), the lender can afford to charge an additional premium from the borrower. Of course theamount of the premium could not exceed the financial benefit that the borrowerobtains in the LSI comparing with the traditional loan. For example, for theparameters described above, the additional premium is associated with the additionalinvestment of $34,700.00 at the beginning of the loan. We stress however that boththe amount of the loan ($100,000) and the amount of the additional investment($34,700.00) keep accumulating interest with the fixed rate (r = 0.1 in our example).8Therefore, in addition to the competitive attractiveness of the LSI for the borrower this additional premium constitutes the financial benefit for the lender (as comparedto the traditional loan). This consideration is illustrated in Table 3. The third column lists the number of shares to be bought by the lender to balance its portfolio. (We again assumed that theunderlying security dynamics is described by (6). In reality this assumption is true onlyon average). Maximum possible premium for the lender (i.e. the financial benefit of theborrower that is equal to the difference between the amounts that have to be repaid byhim in a traditional loan and in the LSI) is enlisted in the fourth column. Table 3 Years Growth of the money owed to the bank(FRI)Number of stock shares if price of one share = 1 atthe beginning of the loan.Additional possible maximal return for thebank 0 100000 34700 0.00 1 110517.09 30256.25 4018.35 2 122140.28 26381.57 8720.46 3 134985.88 23003.09 14195.21 4 149182.47 20057.27 20541.93 5 164872.13 17488.69 27871.57 6 182211.88 15249.05 36308.02 7 201375.27 13296.23 45989.50 8 222554.09 11593.49 57070.21 9 245960.31 10108.80 69722.06 10 271828.18 8814.25 84136.67 Possible Disadvantages. Although the new financial instrument presents several advantages (described above) over the traditional loans widely used today; there are certain disadvantagesassociated with the LSI that should be mentioned. Borrower’s disadvantage: the borrower is now exposed to the market risk for the amount invested in the stocks. Lender’s disadvantage: default risk for the lender increases. If the stock value decreases, the possibility that the borrower may default increases. However since onaverage the stock market goes up, this risk decreases with time. The bank can furtherinsure against default risk by charging a premium (as described above) or requiring theborrower to take an insurance policy against such an event.9A new kind of bond created by combining the LSI and SRI. As was shown above, the LSI grows in time with the fixed interest rate r. Therefore a new kind of bond can be created that combines the LSI (loan-like instrument) and SRI(stock or stock-like instrument). This new bond portfolio could be packaged and sold tointerested 3 rd parties. Conclusion. We have described a new type of combined loan-stock financial instrument (LSI). The risk free portfolio is constructed by combining a traditional loan with some amountof underlying security. The philosophy behind the LSI is quite similar to the Black-Scholes formalism in option theory. As a result the mathematical formulations are as well similar. One could choose more favorable conditions for borrowers by increasing β, the parameter that regulates the connection between the loan and the underlying security in the combined LSI. The increased value of β implies that more money is invested in stocks or stock like securities on behalf of the borrowers by the lender. However this isalso more risky for the borrower (and thus for the lender) since the borrower would findhimself more exposed to the market volatility and would have to pay higher periodicpremiums (monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, etc.) in the event of the decrease of theunderlying security value. The new financial instrument takes advantage of the fact thaton average the stock market grows in time. The LSI is beneficial for both the borrowerand the lender. The borrower benefits due to the decreased amount that has to be repaid.This instrument is therefore more attractive for the borrower than the traditional loan.This attractiveness constitutes the benefit for the lender in terms of market share amongthe borrowers. In addition, the lender can charge an extra premium. This premium couldpartially be used to cover the transaction costs and an insurance component. In addition,sellers of the LSI could also create new mortgage-backed-stock securities. References 1. J. C. Hull, Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, Prentice Hall, NJ (1997). 2. Wilmott P. et al. Option Pricing: Mathematical Models and Computation , Oxford Financial Press, Oxford (1993).
arXiv:physics/0007002v1 [physics.atom-ph] 1 Jul 2000Sub-dekahertz ultraviolet spectroscopy of199Hg+† R. J. Rafac, B. C. Young‡, J. A. Beall, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and J. C. Bergquist National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, C O 80303 USA Using a laser that is frequency-locked to a Fabry- P´ erot ´ etalon of high ﬁnesse and stability, we probe the 5d106s2S1/2(F=0) ↔5d96s2 2D5/2(F=2) ∆m F=0 electric- quadrupole transition of a single laser-cooled199Hg+ion stored in a cryogenic radio-frequency ion trap. We observe Fourier-transform limited linewidths as narrow as 6 .7 Hz at 282 nm (1 .06×1015Hz), yielding a line Q≈1.6×1014. We perform a preliminary measurement of the 5 d96s2 2D5/2 electric-quadrupole shift due to interaction with the stat ic ﬁelds of the trap, and discuss the implications for future trapped-ion optical frequency standards. PACS numbers: 06.30.Ft, 32.30.Jc, 32.80.Pj, 42.62.Fi Precision spectroscopy has held an enduring place in physics, particularly in the elucidation of atomic struc- ture and the measurement of fundamental constants, in the development of accurate clocks, and for fundamen- tal tests of physical laws. Two ingredients of paramount importance are high accuracy, that is, the uncertainty in systematic frequency shifts must be small, and high signal-to-noise ratio, since the desired measurement pre- cision must be reached in a practical length of time. In this paper, we report the measurement of an optical ab- sorption line in a single laser-cooled199Hg+ion at a fre- quency ν0= 1.06×1015Hz (wavelength ≈282 nm) for which a linewidth ∆ ν= 6.7 Hz is observed, yield- ing the highest Q≡ν0/∆νever achieved for optical (or lower frequency) spectroscopy. We also report a prelim- inary measurement of the interaction of the upper state electric-quadrupole moment with the static ﬁeld gradi- ents of the ion trap, which is expected to contribute the largest uncertainty for a frequency standard based on this system. In spectroscopy and for clocks, ﬂuctuations in fre- quency measurement are usually expressed fraction- ally: σy(τ) = ∆ νmeas(τ)/ν0, where τis the to- tal measurement time. When the stability is limited by quantum ﬂuctuations in state detection, σy(τ) = C(2πν0)−1(Nτprobeτ)−1 2, where N is the number of atoms, τprobeis the transition probe time (typically lim- ited by the excited-state lifetime or the stability of the lo - cal oscillator), and Cis a constant of order unity that de- pends on the method of interrogation. For many decades, the highest accuracies and the greatest stabilities have been achieved by locking a microwave oscillator to a hy- perﬁne transition in an atomic ground state [1–5]. Since the fractional instability σy(τ) is inversely proportional to the transition frequency, greater stability can be at- tained using transitions at higher frequencies such as those in the optical region of the electromagnetic spec-194 nm 282 nm S1/22D5/22P1/22 F = 0F = 12F = F = 3F = 0F = 1 40.5 GHz6.9 GHz coolingrepumpingτ( ) ≅ 2 nsP1/22 τ( ) ≅ 90 msD5/22 FIG. 1. Partial energy level diagram of199Hg+with the transitions of interest indicated. trum. Only recently have lasers of suﬃcient spectral purity become available to probe the narrow resonances provided by transitions between long-lived atomic states [6–12]. The stable laser source of Refs. [6,11] and the rel- ative freedom from environmental perturbation aﬀorded by ion trapping enable the high resolution reported here. Combined with novel, highly compact, and accurate laser frequency measurement schemes [13,14], a trapped-ion optical frequency standard would appear to have signiﬁ- cant advantages over present-day atomic clocks. A partial energy-level diagram of199Hg+is shown in Fig. 1. The 282 nm radiation used to drive the 2S1/2↔2D5/2transition is produced in a non-linear crys- tal as the second harmonic of a dye laser oscillating at 563 nm. The frequency of the dye laser radiation is elec- tronically servoed to match a longitudinal mode of a high- ﬁnesse Fabry-P´ erot cavity that is temperature controlled and supported on an isolation platform [6,11]. The stabi- lized laser light is sent through an optical ﬁber to the ta- ble holding the ion trap. Unavoidable mechanical vibra- tion of this ﬁber broadens the laser spectrum by nearly 1 kHz. The ﬁber-induced phase-noise is sensed and re- moved using a method [11] similar to that described in Ref. [15]. Finally, the frequency of the 563 nm light is referenced to the electric-quadrupole transition by ﬁrst frequency-shifting in an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) and then frequency-doubling in a single pass through a deuterated ammonium dihydrogen phosphate crystal. The design of the linear cryogenic ion trap used in these measurements borrows heavily from our previous work [4,16,17]. A single199Hg atom from a thermal source is ionized by an electron beam and trapped in the harmonic pseudopotential formed by the rf and static potentials of a linear quadrupole trap. The trap operates in analogy to a quadrupole mass ﬁlter having its ends “plugged” with 1static ﬁelds. The trap electrodes are constructed from Au-metallized alumina tubes 530 µm in diameter. The electrode axes are held parallel and coincident with the vertices of a square of side 1 .37 mm by an alumina struc- ture that facilitates electrical connection and mounting in the vacuum chamber. One pair of diagonally opposite electrodes is segmented by laser micro-machining prior to metallization to permit application of the axially conﬁning static potential. The remaining pair of electrodes is driven by a cryogenic cop- per helical resonator coupled to a 8 .6 MHz signal source. Under typical operating conditions, a single199Hg+ion exhibits secular motion at 1.45 MHz, 1.86 MHz, and 1.12 MHz in the x,y, and z(axial) directions, respec- tively, as inferred from the vibrational sideband spec- trum of the ion [18]. In addition, biasing electrodes are mounted outside the trap rods to cancel any stray static electric ﬁelds that may be present. Previous experiments using199Hg were performed at room temperature and at a pressure of approximately 10−7Pa [19]. Under those conditions, the background gas pressure was large enough that the ion would be lost due to chemical reaction after only a few minutes. To circumvent this, the ion trap is housed in a liquid He vacuum Dewar like that described in [17]. Engineering particulars of the liquid He cryostat allow low-frequency (<100 Hz) vibratory motion of the trap structure rela- tive to the optical table. Uncorrected, these vibrations contribute 50 −1000 Hz of Doppler broadening to the laser line. We eliminate the majority of this broadening using an additional stage of Doppler cancellation, where the correction signal is derived from optical heterodyne detection of a motion-sensing beam reﬂected from a mir- ror rigidly aﬃxed to the trap [19]. The resulting cancel- lation is not ideal, because the sensing beam is steered by additional optical elements and its path deviates slightly from overlap with the probe beam near the trap. Mea- surements indicate that this optical path diﬀerence can contribute as much as 2 Hz to the spectral width of the 282 nm probe laser in the reference frame of the ion. The ion is laser-cooled to near the 1.7 mK Doppler limit by driving the 5 d106s2S1/2(F=1) ↔5d106p 2P1/2(F=0) cycling transition at 194 nm (Fig. 1) [18]. Because of weak oﬀ-resonant pumping to the2S1/2(F=0) state, we employ a second 194 nm source phase-locked to the ﬁrst with a 47 GHz oﬀset that returns the ion to the ground-state F=1 hyperﬁne level. We tolerate the com- plication of hyperﬁne structure, since only isotopes with nonzero nuclear spin can have ﬁrst-order magnetic-ﬁeld- insensitive transitions that provide immunity from ﬂuc- tuations of the ambient ﬁeld. This signiﬁcantly relaxes the requirements for control and/or shielding of environ- mental magnetic sources. We monitor the ion and deduce its electronic state using light scattered from the cooling transition. Flu- orescence at 194 nm is collected by a ﬁve-element uv- grade fused silica f/1 objective located inside the cryo-stat. The scattered light is imaged outside the Dewar, spatially ﬁltered with a 75 µm aperture, and relayed with a second lens to an imaging photomultiplier tube having ≈5% quantum eﬃciency at 194 nm. Transitions to the 2D5/2state are detected using the technique of “electron shelving,” which infers the presence of the atom in the metastable level through the absence of scattering from the strong laser-cooling transition [18,20]. A metastable - state detection eﬃciency near unity can be achieved, be- cause the absorption of a single 282 nm photon suppresses scattering of many photons from the 194 nm transition for a period determined by the lifetime of the2D5/2state. The radiation from the 194 nm and 282 nm sources is admitted to the trap sequentially using mechanical shut- ters and an AOM, which prevents broadening of the quadrupole transition by the cooling radiation. Typi- cal count rates are 2000 Hz for a single ion cycling at the half-power point of the cooling transition, compared to only 20 Hz combined laser scatter and photomulti- plier thermal background when the ion is shelved in the metastable level. Spectra of the recoilless “carrier” component of the 2S1/2(F=0) ↔2D5/2(F=2) ∆m F=0 transition were ob- tained for a range of probe times and laser intensities by laser cooling for 30 ms, preparing the ion in the F= 0 ground state by blocking the repumping laser, and then interrogating the quadrupole transition. The spectra are built up from multiple bidirectional scans of the 282 nm probe laser frequency. Since the frequency drift of the probe laser is not precisely compensated, nor is it con- stant, we incorporate a locking step in between pairs of positive- and negative-going frequency sweeps about the center of the quadrupole resonance. In the locking se- quence, we step the frequency of the probe laser alter- nately to the approximate half-maximum on either side of the quadrupole resonance, probe for a ﬁxed time τservo, and then look for transitions to the2D5/2level. Typ- ically, 48 measurements are made on each side of the resonance during each lock cycle. The asymmetry be- tween the number of quantum jumps detected on the high- and low-frequency sides of the resonance is used to correct the frequency of a synthesizer used to compen- sate for cavity drift. In this fashion, variations in the frequency of the 282 nm laser for times exceeding several seconds are reduced. Using the locking step alone with τservo= 40 ms, the error signal from the lock indicates a fractional frequency instability σy(τ) = 1.5×10−15for times comparable to the length of the combined servo and scanning cycle (15-60 s). This is worse than the quantum projection-noise-limited stability ( ≈5×10−16) but is con- sistent with ﬂuctuating quadratic Zeeman shifts arising from variations in the ambient magnetic ﬁeld. The trap was not magnetically shielded during the measurements reported here. Spectra are plotted in Fig. 2 for a variety of probe times τprobe= 20 −120 ms, with τservo=τprobe. The linewidths of all the spectra are transform limited by the 2-75 0 750.60.70.80.91.0 -30 0 30 -10 0100.60.70.80.91.0 -7 0 7(a) (b) (c) (d)P g Δf (Hz)282P g Δf (Hz)282 FIG. 2. Quantum-jump absorption spectra of the2S1/2 (F=0) ↔2D5/2(F=2) ∆m F=0 electric-quadrupole transition. ∆f282is the frequency of the 282 nm probe laser detuning, and Pgis the probability of ﬁnding the atom in the ground state. The four plots correspond to excitation with 282 nm pulses of diﬀerent lengths: (a) 20 ms (averaged over 292 sweeps), (b) 40 ms (158 sweeps), (c) 80 ms (158 sweeps), and (d) 120 ms (46 sweeps). The linewidths are consistent with the Fourier-transform limit of the pulse at 40(2) Hz, 20(1) Hz, 10(1) Hz, and 6(1) Hz. ﬁnite probe time, decreasing to 6 .7 Hz in the uv at 120 ms, the longest time used. The carrier transition amplitude is a function of the initial value of the vibra- tional quantum number n(see, for example, Eqn. 31 of Ref. [22]). Since for our trapping parameters /angbracketleftn/angbracketright ≈35 at the Doppler cooling limit, it is not possible to transfer the electron to the2D5/2state with unit probability. The observed signals are in good agreement with the theoret- ical expectation, and the signal loss for τprobe= 120 ms (Fig. 2(d)) is consistent with applying the probe for a time that exceeds the natural lifetime of the2D5/2 state by 33%. This result corresponds to a fractional frequency resolution of 6 .3×10−15, which we believe is the smallest reported for excitation with an opti- cal or microwave source. The result is surpassed only by M¨ ossbauer spectroscopy in ZnO, where a fractional linewidth of 2 .5×10−15was achieved using a nuclear source of 93 keV gamma rays [21], which is not practical for use in an atomic clock. The measurements reported here illustrate the potential of a single-ion optical fre- quency standard and conﬁrm the phase stability of our probe laser system, validating the results of the hetero- dyne comparison of the two reference cavities [6,11]. An excellent review of the performance of similar systems can be found in Ref. [12]. Figure 3 shows a typical power-broadened spectrum with consequent Rabi “sidebands,” using τprobe= 10 ms andτservo= 40 ms. A least-squares ﬁt to the data indi- cates that it is consistent with a pulse area of 2.41(7) π (relative to n≈0) and a mean vibrational quantum num--250 -125 0 125 2500.60.70.80.91.0 Δf (Hz)282P g FIG. 3. Quantum-jump absorption spectrum of the power-broadened electric-quadrupole transition. ∆ f282is the frequency of the 282 nm probe laser detuning, and P gis the probability of ﬁnding the atom in the ground state. The data are averaged over 348 frequency sweeps with τprobe= 10 ms andτservo= 40 ms. The solid line is a least-squares ﬁt to a Rabi line proﬁle with pulse area 2.41(7) πand/angbracketleftn/angbracketright=73(9). The quantum-projection-noise-limited uncertainty is indica ted by representative error bars plotted every third point. ber/angbracketleftn/angbracketright=73(9). This is twice the value of /angbracketleftn/angbracketrightexpected at the Doppler cooling limit; the larger result is likely due to saturation of the cooling transition. In Fig. 4 we plot the central three Ramsey fringes of a time-domain separated-oscillatory-ﬁelds interrogatio n of the2S1/2↔2D5/2transition with 5 ms pulses sepa- rated by a 20 ms free-precession interval. In operation as a frequency standard, the Ramsey method oﬀers 1 .6× reduction in linewidth (and a corresponding increase in stability) for an equivalent measurement period. It should be possible to reduce the uncertainties of all systematic shifts in this system including the second- order Doppler (time-dilation) shift and static or dynamic Zeeman and Stark shifts to values approaching 10−18. The electric-quadrupole shift of the2D5/2F=2 (m F=0) state arising from coupling with the static potentials of the trap is expected to be the limiting systematic contri- bution in future measurements of the absolute value of the2S1/2↔2D5/2transition frequency, because of the dif- ﬁculty in determining with certainty the magnitude and conﬁguration of the static ﬁelds of the trap. In princi- ple, it is possible to eliminate this shift by measuring the quadrupole transition frequencies for each of three mu- tually orthogonal orientations of a quantizing magnetic ﬁeld of constant magnitude; the mean value is then the unperturbed2S1/2↔2D5/2transition frequency. We fol- low this procedure for several values of the total magnetic induction and for all possible directions in a suitable co- ordinate system (e.g. [1 1 1], [1 -1 -1], [-1 -1 1], where [1 1 1] is elevated 45◦from the trap axis and 45◦from the vertical plane). Using the ion as a magnetometer, the magnitude of the ﬁeld produced by three sets of coils is 30.60.70.80.91.0 -60 -30 0 30 60 Δf (Hz)282P g FIG. 4. The central three fringes obtained by time-domain Ramsey interrogation of the electric-quadrupole transiti on. ∆f282is the frequency of the 282 nm probe laser detuning, and P gis the probability of ﬁnding the atom in the ground state. The data are averaged over 328 frequency sweeps with τservo= 40 ms. The solid line is the expected Ramsey signal for 5 ms pulses separated by 20 ms of free precession; the ≈10% background arises primarily from suboptimal setting of the discriminator levels in our detection electronics. T he quantum-projection-noise-limited uncertainty is indica ted by representative error bars plotted every third point. calibrated by the measurement of the frequency of the F=0→2 (∆m F= 2) magnetic ﬁeld-dependent electric- quadrupole transition. For an ideal linear trap with sec- ular frequencies ωx=ωyandωz= 2π(1 MHz), we calcu- late a shift that varies between +7 .5 Hz and −15 Hz de- pending on ﬁeld orientation. The estimate of the atomic quadrupole moment is based on Hartree-Fock wavefunc- tions for the ground state of Hg+, which yield the matrix element /angbracketleft5d\|r2\|5d/angbracketright= 6.61×10−21m2[23]. In our appara- tus we observe shifts departing from the mean frequency by +12(7) Hz, +9(13) Hz, and −27(7) Hz for the three ﬁeld orientations at 282 nm, in reasonable agreement with the simple model. The quoted uncertainties arise from imprecision in our ability to set the absolute magni- tude and direction of the magnetic induction. Thus the fractional frequency uncertainty is of order 10−14, and we might reduce this below 10−15in the present appara- tus with straightforward improvements to the magnetic shielding and control. Uncertainties approaching 10−18 should be obtainable through stringent control of mag- netic ﬁelds in combination with a spherical rf quadrupole trap geometry that does not rely on static potentials for conﬁnement. Greater resolution and accuracy might be more readily achieved using a diﬀerent type of tran- sition, e.g., the weak hyperﬁne-induced electric-dipole transitions like those between the low-lying1S0and3P0 states of the singly-ionized species of the Group IIIA el- ements of the periodic table [12,24,25], particularly in cases where ﬁrst-order magnetic-ﬁeld independent tran- sitions are available (albeit at nonzero ﬁeld) [26]. This research was partially supported by the Oﬃce ofNaval Research and through a Cooperative Research and Development agreement with Timing Solutions, Corp., Boulder, Colorado. We would like to thank C. Oates, J. Ye, and D. Sullivan for their careful reading of this manuscript. †Work of the U.S. Government, not subject to U.S. copy- right. ‡Present address: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. [1] A. Clairon et al., Proc. 5th Symp. on Freq. Standards and Metrology (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore) 49-59 (1996). [2] R. L. Tjoelker, et al., Proc. 5th Symp. on Freq. Stan- dards and Metrology (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore) 33-38 (1996). [3] P. T. H. Fisk et al., IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 44, 344 (1997). [4] D. J. Berkeland et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2089 (1998). [5] S. R. Jeﬀerts et al., Metrologia, submitted. [6] B. C. Young et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3799 (1999). [7] Ch. Salomon et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 1576 (1988). [8] N. M. Sampas et al., Opt. Lett. 18, 947 (1993). [9] O. Acef, Opt. Comm. 134, 479 (1997). [10] S. Seel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4741 (1997). [11] B. C. Young et al., Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Laser Spect. (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore) 61-70 (1999). [12] A. A. Madej and J. E. Bernard, in Frequency Measure- ment and Control , Andre N. Luiten editor, Springer Top- ics in Applied Physics (Springer Verlag, Berlin), in press. [13] J. Reichert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3232 (2000). [14] S. A. Diddams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., submitted. [15] L.-S. Ma et al., Opt. Lett. 19, 1777 (1994). [16] M. G. Raizen et al., J. Mod. Opt. 39, 233 (1992). [17] M. E. Poitzsch et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 129 (1996). [18] J. C. Bergquist et al., Phys. Rev. A 36, 428 (1987). [19] J. C. Bergquist et al., Proc. Int. School of Physics Enrico Fermi CXX (North Holland, Amsterdam) 359 (1994). [20] H. G. Dehmelt, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 60 (1975) and J. Phys. (Paris) Colloq. 42, C8-299 (1980). [21] G. J. Perlow et al., J. Phys. (Paris) Colloq. 35, C6-197 (1974). [22] D. J. Wineland and W. M. Itano, Phys. Rev. A 20, 1521 (1979). [23] A. D. McLean and R. S. McLean, Atomic Data and Nucl. Data Tables 26, 197 (1981). [24] H. G. Dehmelt, IEEE Trans. Inst. Meas. IM-31 , 83 (1982). [25] E. Peik et al., Proc. 13th Euro. Freq. and Time Forum and the 1999 IEEE Freq. Contr. Symp. Besan¸ con, France, 682-685 (1999). [26] D. J. Wineland and W. M. Itano, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 27, 864 (1982). 4
arXiv:physics/0007003v1 [physics.gen-ph] 3 Jul 2000General relativity as a complete theory and its new conseque nces∗† Zahid Zakir Institute of Noosphere, 11a Sayram, Tashkent, 700170 Uzbekistan zahid@in.edu.uz Abstract It is shown that a local extension of distances in a gravitati onal ﬁeld leads to a global topological diﬀerence between the Schwarzschild coordinates and the ph ysical coordinates of local inertial frame. In term of a physical time and a physical radius the falling in Sc hwarzschild ﬁeld particles and photons elastically reﬂect from a gravitational radius. It is shown that the Schwarzschild frame is complete, an interior region of gravitational radius is unphysical, a ho rizon and a singularity not appear. As result the general relativity really predicts an existence of heav y barionic and quark stars and quasars instead of black holes. The high redshifts of quasars can be explaine d mainly as a gravitational redshift. A model of oscillating Universe without a cosmological singu larity is proposed. A new type of cosmological redshift is predicted which can partly solve the dark matter problem. In the theories of strings and branes the singularities of black hole solutions disappear in term of physical variables. A renormalization in quantum ﬁeld theory also is derived as a natural consequen ce of general relativity prescriptions. 1 Introduction The modern standard treatment of general relativity leads t o anintrinsic incompleteness of the theory because of the appearance of horizons and singularities in t he black holes and cosmology. Is this a necessary consequence of ﬁrst principles or the theory can be reformul ated as a complete one without changing the ﬁrst principles? Up to now the predicted black holes are not convincingly reve aled, but at the same time more than 13200 quasars are discovered with very high red shifts ( z <5.8) which can not be explained in the standard treatment of general relativity without assumptions about fantastic masses, luminosities and fantastically small sizes and large distances. Why so many diﬃculties appe ar in an identiﬁcation of few candidates to predicted objects, while the objects which diﬃcultly exp lained in the theory so easily discovered by astronomers every week during last 35 year? In the existing standard treatments of general relativity a main attention was drawn to the metrics and coordinates as some formal mathematical tools and little at tention is given to their physical meaning and measurability. In this paper it is argued, that the general relativity becomes a complete theory after an adequate to ﬁrst principles interpretation of the results o f spatial and temporal measurements. We describe a new picture of the particle’s motion in the Schw arzschild ﬁeld with a reﬂection of falling particles from the source. We show that the process is fully r eversible in time, the Schwarzschild’s frame becomes complete, the horizons and singularities disappea r. The correctly interpreted general relativity not predicts a collapse and black holes, but it naturally explai ns quasars with the arbitrary high redshifts as relativistic stars or galaxy nucleus with ordinary masses, luminosities, sizes and distances. It is shown that the general relativity not contains a cosmol ogical singularity and it leads to the oscillating cosmological models. A new type of cosmological redshift is predicted as result of ”potential diﬀerence” between scale parameter at a time of emission and at the prese nt time with respect to a ”center of mass” of Universe in fourth dimension. The problem of dark matter p robably can be naturally solved taking into account this additional redshift. Another surprise of the n ew treatment is a derivation of renormalization procedures in quantum ﬁeld theory from the ﬁrst principles o f general relativity. ∗To be published in: ”Z.Zakir. Structure of space-time. Part II, paper 18, I.N., Tashkent, 2000.” †c/circlecopyrtInstitute of Noosphere, 2000. 12 SCALES AND CLOCKS IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD 2 In the paper the corrected version of the new formulation is p resented, the preliminary properties of which was published in my previous papers [3] . More detail co nsiderations and discussions will be presented in [4] and in the forthcoming publications. 2 Scales and clocks in a gravitational ﬁeld In spacetime with metric gikthe arbitrary curvilinear coordinate systems can be used an d a spacetime interval ds2 (g)=gikdxidxkis invariant under the coordinate transformations dxi= (∂xi/∂xi′)·dxi′. But a deﬁnite coordinate system has a meaning from a physical poin t of view only after describing a behavior of scales and clocks on a physical frame, on the basis of which th ese coordinates can be measured. In a static gravitational ﬁeld four types of special frames can be intro duced which we describe below in a form which we will use in this paper. 2.1 Rest frame at inﬁnity (I-frame) For the static local source it is natural to choice a Galilean frame at inﬁnity which is at rest with respect to this source ( I-frame ) with ﬂat euclidean spacetime interval between two events: ds2 (I)=c2dt2−dR2−R2dΩ2(1) where dΩ2=dθ2+ sin2θ·dϕ2is the line element on 2-sphere. At ﬁnite distances from the source the curvilinear coordina tesxiwith gravitationally deformed scale and time units can be expressed in terms of the I-frame coordinat esXa= (t, R, θ, ϕ ) with the scale and time units same as on I-frame: dxi= (∂xi/∂Xa)dXaand we have for the spacetime interval: ds2 (g)=g(0) ab(X)dXadXb(2) Here g(0) ab(X) =gik∂xi ∂Xa∂xi ∂Xb(3) isa true remainder metric of spacetime with a nonzero curvature tensor which (on a rest frame of the source) describes the true gravitational ﬁeld. In such cons ideration the gravitation represents as a diﬀerence of the spacetime geometry with respect to the I-frame geomet ry. This true remainder metric can not be transformed to the trivial ﬂat metric ηab=diag(1,−1,−1,−1) without transformation of I-frame coordinates Xato another coordinates X′awhich means that the scale and time units then becomes diﬀere nt from the I-frame units. 2.2 Local inertial rest frame (L-frame) Let we introduce a local inertial frame which begins free fal ling from a given point of the gravitational ﬁeld at ﬁnite distance from the source ( L-frame ). A scale and a clock of L-frame at given point are momentary a t rest with respect to the source (and to the I-frame). On L-fra me the gravitational ﬁeld absent (only locally and during a small time interval) and the scale, clock and com oving objects are at weightlessness . By the coordinate transformations dxi= (∂xi/∂Xα)dXαwith property: gik∂xi ∂Xα∂xi ∂Xβ=ηαβ (4) we obtain L-frame line element as: ds2 (L)=ηαβdXαdXβ(5) We consider a special form of this line element as: ds2 (L)=c2dτ2−dr2−R2dΩ2(6) where dr(R) and dτ(R) are spatial and temporal intervals which measured by L-fra me scales and clocks and a length of orbit is l= 2πR. Are the scale and time standards of the L-frame in gravitati onal ﬁeld2 SCALES AND CLOCKS IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD 3 identical with the scale and time standards of the I-frame, a nd can we identify dr(R) with dRanddτ(R) withdt? L- and I-frames are at rest with respect to each other and on b oth frames scales and clocks are at weightlessness. Nevertheless we can see that the scale and time standards on L- and I-frames are diﬀerent since they are situated at the diﬀerent points of space with d iﬀerent curvatures and that moreover ds2 (L)< ds2 (I). The L-frame coordinates have another scale and time units t han I-frame with the relations: dXb=∂Xb ∂XαdXα=hb α(X)dXα(7) We have in the gravitational ﬁeld a conserved energy of the pa rticle Ewhich is equal to a rest energy E0=m0c2at inﬁnity ( R→ ∞) and for the falling from inﬁnity particle can be written as: E=m0c2/radicalBigg 1−rg/R 1−v2/c2=m0c2(8) Herev=dr/dτ is a local velocity and therefore: dr cdτ=v c=/radicalbiggrg R(9) where rg= 2GM/c2is the gravitational radius, Gis Newton constant, Mis a mass of the source. If the spacetime interval on L-frame we represent in term of I-fram e coordinates, we get the ordinary Schwarzschild solution with a contraction of time intervals dτ=γ1/2dtand an extension of space distances dr=γ−1/2dR, where γ= 1−rg/R.We have on L-frame: ds2 (L)=γc2dt2−γ−1dR2−R2dΩ2(10) It is very important for our purposes that dr=γ−1/2dR > dR sincethe gravitational extension of the radial distances on L-frame with respect to I-frame distances. The I-frame ob server at inﬁnity receive photons emitted by L-frame atom with a gravitational redshi ftz= ∆λ/λ0=γ−1/2−1. 2.3 Freely falling from inﬁnity frame (F-frame) The velocities of scales and clocks of this frame are increas ing with respect to L-frame observers due to energy conservation at falling and the L-frame observers really ca n measure the potential of the gravitational ﬁeld by the measuring these velocities. The scales, clocks and co moving objects on F-frame are also at the weightlessness but the space and time units of F-frame conta in Lorentz contractions with respect to L-frame standards. From a point of view of the F-frame observer the L- frame scales and temporal intervals are Lorentz contracted: dτ=γ−1/2(dT−vdR′/c2) (11) dr=γ−1/2(dR′−vdT) (12) where dR′anddTare F-frame radial distance and time interval. The spacetim e interval between two events of F-frame comoving objects can be derived from L-fra me interval after the Lorentz transformation as: ds2 (L)=c2dT2−dR′2−R2dΩ2(13) If two events occurred at the same point of the F-frame, then dR′=dΩ = 0 and we have for a proper time of F-frame object the relations: c2dT2=γ·c2dτ2=γ2c2dt2(14) The proper time of F-frame atom dThas the Lorentz contraction with respect to L-frame atom’s t ime interval dτat the same point of space Rand L-frame observer detects Doppler shift of the frequency of photons emitted by the F-frame atom. The I-frame observer at inﬁnity will receive photons emitted by F-frame atom with a combined redshift which has the gravitat ional and Doppler components.3 A KINEMATICS OF RADIALLY FALLING PARTICLES 4 The length of scale dR′on F-frame at one moment of time ( dT= 0) can be represented across L- and I-frame scales as: dR′=γ1/2dr=γ1/2(γ−1/2dR) =dR (15) Therefore, from a point of view of F-frame observer the radia l distance ∆ R′between two orbits with lengths l1= 2πR1andl2= 2πR2is equal to their lengths diﬀerence divided to 2 π, i.e. ( l2−l1)/2π= ∆R= ∆R′,exactly same as in the case of ﬂat euclidean space. From the po int of view of F-frame observer the gravitational extension of distances between orbits is exactly compensated by the Lorentz contractions of these distances. In fact, on F-frame we can consider space in the gravitational ﬁeld as a ﬂat space of I-frame. This fact will be used below at the study of particle’s kinema tics. 2.4 Rest frame in the gravitational ﬁeld (S-frame) The scales and clocks of S-frame on ﬁxed points are at rest wit h respect to the source (and to I-frame). The scales, clocks and objects (atoms) on this frame are subject ed to a gravitational acceleration and they can situated at rest only by help of some external (nongravitati onal) forces. As result, they have a weght weight.. The external forces exactly compensate the gravitational f orce and, therefore, by measuring the weights of sample particles which situated at rest on diﬀerent points o f the ﬁeld, the gravitational potential can be exactly measured. The general relativity based on the Einstein’s assumption ( 1907, 1911) that the acceleration (and external force) not change the scale and time units on S-frame in ﬁrst order to the value of acceleration and that they are approximately identical with scale and time units of the momentary comovin g L-frames. Therefore, in the ﬁrst order the consideration of metrics and spacetime intervals on S-frame can be replaced by the L-frame metrics and intervals. In the case of strong ﬁelds and the exact solutions this assum ption may be inadequate to a situation. In [4] a more general situation without Einstein’s assumption will be considered. Such modiﬁcation of general relativity not contradicts to its ﬁrst principles and leads to the observable eﬀects as new types of redshifts. In this case the free falling atoms (of neutral gas) as micros copic local inertial frames and the ﬁxed atoms (solid state and plasma) as S-frames on a surface of star emit s with diﬀerent redshifts. Moreover, on the Earth a local gravitational red (blue) shift between a source and a detector can be observed if one of them is at rest (ﬁxed S-frame) with a weight and another is at weigh tlessness (free falling L-frame). In the present paper for a simplicity we not consider such mod iﬁcation and we deal with the ordinary general relativity withEinstein’s assumption, since we will consider all eﬀects on L- or F-frames only. 3 A kinematics of radially falling particles Let we observe on L-frame the free falling from inﬁnity sampl e particle. We can obtain an equation of motion for this particle as the local (physical) time τdependence of the radial coordinate Rby using the energy conservation condition: ±cdτ=dr/radicalBigg R rg=dRγ−1/2/radicalBigg R rg(16) and: ±c(τ−τ0) =1 r1/2 g/integraldisplayRdR/radicalbig R−rg(17) After the integration we obtain: cτ=±2(R+ 2rg) 3r1/2 g/radicalbig R−rg (18) where we take τ0= 0 at R=rgwhich means that τ= 0 at R=rgand then a worldline of particle is symmetric under this moment. It is surprising, that a minimal distance, which can be reached by the falling particle is R=rgand then it elastically reﬂects from the source.3 A KINEMATICS OF RADIALLY FALLING PARTICLES 5 A geometric reason for such behavior of Rcan be understanded after an obtaining direct relationship between I-frame radial coordinate Rand the physical radial distance in the gravitational ﬁeld r(R) on L-frame as: r(R) =/integraldisplaydR/radicalBig 1−rg R= [R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+rgF(R)] (19) where F(R) = ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/radicalBigg R rg(1 +/radicalbigg 1−rg R)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(20) with property F(rg) = 0.The lower limit of integration here may be only R0=rg, where the physical radius vanishes: r(R) = 0. This means that zero point of the physical radius r= 0 where the source located from the point of view of L-frame observer, corresponds to th e value of the radial coordinate R0=rgof I-frame observer. Therefore, the result of the local gravitational extension of radial distances between orbits in the curved spacetime is the global topological diﬀerence between L- and I-frame coordi nate systems when to the values of physical radius rin the interval (0 ,∞) correspond the values of radial coordinate Rin the interval ( rg,∞) and for their coincidence the interior region of gravitational radius R < r gmust be excluded as unphysical part of I-frame coordinate system. Such topological cutting is usual in a case of plane geograph ic maps of the earth surface. Due to a curvature, in the line element on the sphere dΩ2=dθ2+ sin2θ·dϕ2the plane meridional angle ∆ ϕ between two meridians multiplied to a scale contraction fac tor sin θand it must be replaced by true angle ∆Φ = sin θ·∆ϕwhich describe the real situation. As result at the poles θ=±π/2 we have an angle contraction ∆Φ = 0 at ﬁnite ∆ ϕ/ne}ationslash= 0. At a manufacturing of globs 36 (or 24) meridional plane ma ps each at the interval 100(or 150) are prepared which can be glued to a sphere and then an adequa te model of the earth surface can be obtained. If we want to glue these meridi onal parts of globe not on the sphere but on a plane surface, we obtain the plane map in form of a rake with 3 6 north and 36 south ﬁctive ”poles” and with ’unphysical gaps” between meridional maps (disappear ing only at the equator). In a limited case we obtain inﬁnity number of the narrow meridional plane maps wi th inﬁnity number of the ﬁctive poles which can be joined to two ”polar lines” (north and south). Analogously, in the case of the gravitational ﬁeld the ﬂat sp ace radial coordinate diﬀerence ∆ Rin the spatial line element dl2=γ−1dR2+R2dΩ2multiplied to a scale extension factor γ−1/2and only the physical radial distance ∆ r=γ−1/2∆Rdescribe the real situation. Here we obtain ∆ R→0 atR→rgfor ﬁnite ∆ r from the one side and r= 0 at R=rgfrom the other side. When the sample particle begins falling from an orbitr(R1) and it reaches the centre of sphere r= 0 where it meet with point source, this particle reaches in term of the ﬂat space coordinate Ronly the gravitational radius rg. As result, in ﬂat space coordinates we obtain inﬁnity number ﬁctive ”sources” at ”sphere” R=rginstead of real one point source. We obtain the true spatial distance after the summing of small displac ements ∆ Rwhich multiplied to the scale factor γ−1/2, as result of which after the integration we obtain r(R1). We see that in our new picture the particle can not ”penetrate ’ to an interior of region R < r g, a horizon and singularities are disappear, the world line of particle is continuous, the frame is complete (not contains unobservable regions) and the process is fully reversible i n time. If local inertial observers in each orbit register the falling particle and after some time register a returning of this particle, these events are absolute physical facts and the such character of the world line is inv ariant under transformations of the local inertial frames. We can consider this process from a point of view of the F-fram e observer, where the space-time interval (proper time) of falling particle is: c2dT2= (c2dτ2 dr2−1)dr2=R rgdR2(21) If we directly integrate with lower limit R0= 0 then we obtain the well known Lemaitre’s result (see [2]) which is the basic formula for modern standard treatmen ts of the Schwarzschild problem with horizon, collapse and singularity. We know from the previous considerations that the radial coo rdinate Ris identical on F- and I-frames. But we also know that on the I-frame radial coordinate Rcontains a ”physical” or ”dynamic” part Rg,3 A KINEMATICS OF RADIALLY FALLING PARTICLES 6 coinciding with the physical radius rand the unphysical part rgand it can be represented as R=Rg+rg, where Rg= 0 at R=rg. Therefore, we have: c(T−T0) =±1 r1/2 g/integraldisplay/radicalbig Rg+rgdRg (22) and: c(T−T0) =±2 3r1/2 g(R3/2−r3/2 g) (23) This formula diﬀers from the standard black (white) hole picture because of here the falling particle elastically reﬂects from the gravitational radius R=rgatT=T0and it can not ”penetrating” into the region R < r g. From the previous energy conservation condition an equatio n of motion for the falling particle in term of the local Schwarzschild observer’s time tcan be obtained as: ±cdt=dR (1−rg R)/radicalBig rg R(24) and after the integration we have: ±c(t−t0) =/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleR β1/2[2 3+ 4β+β3/2K(R)]/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleR1 Ra(25) where β=rg/Rand: K(R) = ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1−β1/2 1 +β1/2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(26) This time interval is divergent if the lower limit Ra=rg, but this divergence is the result of the pointness of source. The real source has a ﬁnite size aand the lower value of physical radius is not zero but is r=a. In term of radial coordinate this means that Ra=a+rgis the minimal value of radial coordinate Rwhich deﬁne the value of t0. Then we obtain the ﬁnite time interval for the falling and th e reﬂecting of particle in coordinates of the observer at inﬁnity. The space-time interval for a radially falling photon on L- f rame is: ds2=γc2dt−γ−1dR2= 0 (27) Therefore, a local time dependence of Ralong the world line of photon on L-frame (light cone) is: cτ=±r (28) or ±cτ=R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+rgF(R) (29) and in term of I-frame time: ±c(t−t0) =R−rg+rgln\|R−rg a\| (30) Here we take τ=t= 0 at R=rg. When the times τandtare change at intervals ( −∞,0) and (0 ,∞),R changes at interval ( rg,∞). The trajectory of photon also is time symmetric and it elas tically reﬂects from the source at R=rg. Thus, we can conclude, that: 1) World lines of particles and photons are continuous and ti melike, at all values of T, τandtin the interval ( −∞,∞) the radial coordinate Rchanges in the interval ( rg,∞). Therefore, Schwarzschild’s frame and coordinates are complete;4 A SIMPLEST DERIVATION OF THE CLASSICAL EFFECTS 7 2) The falling particles and photons elastically reﬂect at R=rg,the processes are fully reversible in time and all times are ﬁnite (for ﬁnite distances and ﬁnite size so urces); 3) The horizon, singularity and collapse are not appear in ge neral relativity if we deﬁne the space-time variables adequately to the true geometry of the curved spac etime. 4 A simplest derivation of the classical eﬀects Since the region R < r gis excluded from the space volume of general relativity, we c an treat this fact as some topological property of the relativistic gravitation , which diﬀers it from Newtonian gravity. In term of ”topologically shifted” radial coordinate Rg=R−rgthe Schwarzschild’s solution can be rewritten as: ds2=c2dt2 1 +rg Rg−(1 +rg Rg)dR2 g−(Rg+rg)2dΩ2(31) IfRg→0, the interval on the orbital sphere tends to r2 gdΩ2, but this circumstance is not suﬃcient since near the gravitational radius the falling becomes pure radi al and dΩ2→0. The ﬁrst order corrections to the Newtonian formulas then ca n be obtained by a simple rule, that the relativistic source located to rgnearer to the same orbit than Newtonian one. In other words, the relativistic source acts to the particle at orbit Rexactly same as the Newtonian source acts to the particle at o rbit R−rg. Thus, we have a ”topologically corrected” Newton potentia l: ϕ=−GM R−rg(32) The perihelion shift, the light deﬂection and the time delay then can be represented in the ﬁrst order as such ”topological” eﬀects. For a planet at the orbit Rwe replace in Newtonian formula RbyR−rgand then we directly obtain Einstein’s formula for the periheli on shift per period: ω=/radicalBigg 2Mγ (R−rg)3=2π T0[1 +3rg 2R] (33) which for the elliptic orbit with focal parameter Lleads to: ∆ϕ=3πrg L=6πγM c2L(34) An angle of the deﬂection of photons according to the princip le of equivalence of Newtonian gravity is: α=rg R(35) where Ris nearest distance to the source from the photon’s path. Her e the gravitational ﬁeld eﬀectively acts only on the part of the photon’s path with length R, and then photons fall near to the source to the distance rg(αR=rg). If the relativistic source begin act to photons from the sa me point as Newtonian one, then photons will fall to rgsince the Newtonian gravity and will fall an additional rgsince the diﬀerence between radii of the relativistic orbit and the Newtonian or bit. Then the resulting deﬂection angle will be two times more than in Newtonian gravity: α=2rg R(36) 5 New theory of relativistic stars Let we consider Tolman’s solution of Einstein equations in t he case of spherically symmetric dust matter (see [2]). The line element can be chosen as: ds2=c2dτ2−eλ(τ,R a)dR2 a−R2(τ, Ra)dΩ2(37) with a solution:5 NEW THEORY OF RELATIVISTIC STARS 8 eλ(τ,R a)= (∂R ∂Ra)2[1 +f(Ra)]−1(38) HereRais a radial coordinate of dust matter particle and τis its proper time. Then an equation of motion can be obtained as: (∂R c∂τ)2=f(Ra) +F(Ra) R(39) which has a solution: ±c[τ0(Ra)−τ] =/integraldisplaydR (f+F R)1/2(40) Here the three types of solutions can be obtained at f >0,f <0 and f= 0. In the standard treatments a scenario of collapse is qualitatively the same for the ever y cases [2]. We take the simplest case f= 0 since in other cases the pictures are qualitatively the same as in t his case. The time dependence of the radial coordinate then directly c an be obtained as: c[τ0(Ra)−τ] =±2 3F1/2[R3/2 a−R3/2] (41) The radial distances on F-and I-frames have identical scale units and here RandRaare identical with I-frame radial coordinate, which contains the physical par t (Rph) and the unphysical constant part ( rg(e)) in the form R=Rph+rg(e). Here rg(e)>0 is an eﬀective gravitational radius which can be calculate d taking into account a radial coordinate dependence of F(Ra) and using the fact that every layer with deﬁnite Ra falls to a center of gravity due to a gravitating of the Schwar zschild ﬁeld of the mass inside the radius Ra. Then we come to the analogous conclusions as in the case of fal ling sample particle in external static ﬁeld. Particularly, a free falling layer of dust matter with radia l coordinate Raafter the time τ=τ0reaches the center of gravity with Rph= 0, which for the observer at inﬁnity located on the eﬀective gravitational radius R=rg(e), the layer reﬂects at this value of R=rg(e)and then it move away. The horizon and collapse disappear, spacetime intervals for physical objects are ti melike (or lightlike). A volume of sphere around the source is: V= 4π/integraldisplay R2γ−1/2dR= 4π/integraldisplay R2γ−1/2dRg (42) This integral easily can be calculated and we obtain: V(R) =4π 3R3γ3/2+ 3πrgR2(1−rg 2R)γ1/2+ 6πr2 gRγ1/2+ (43) + 4πr3 gln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/radicalBigg R rg(1 +γ1/2)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle−3πr3 g 4ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2R rg(1 +γ1/2)−1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(44) We see, that V(rg) = 0 and the region R < r gis excluded from the space volume of general relativity since the lower limit of integration is R=rgorRg= 0. This fact and the results of preceding considerations lead to a new picture of stellar evolution including new fami lies of compact relativistic stars with sizes near their gravitational radii. Relativistic stars we will clas sify by two natural parameters - rgwhich ﬁx a mass (M)andβ=rg/Rwhich ﬁx a redshift ( z).In term of these natural parameters the volume of star is: V(R) =4πr3 g 3{β−3γ1/2[1 +5 4β+27 8β2] +Q(β)} (45) where Q(β) = 3 ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleβ−1/2(1 +γ1/2)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle−9 16ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 β(1 +γ1/2)−1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(46) A density of star with mass Min a case of homogeneous matter is:6 GENERAL RELATIVITY AS THE THEORY OF QUASARS 9 ρ=M·V−1(R) (47) Supercompact stars with R∼rg, have a ﬁnite volume and a ﬁnite density. Hence, the hierarch y of supercompact stars with ordinary and extraordinary physic al matter not stop on the neutron star’s level, but it continued to more dense physical states. For the stars with masses more than the critical mass of neutron star’s stability M > (3÷5)M⊙the family of stable states can appears. The ﬁrst is the famil y ofheavy baryon stars, containing baryonic resonances (Λ ,Σ,Ξ,∆). The multiquark hadron stars andquark stars, which appear after quark-hadron phase transition also can b e considered. Some of the observing candidates to black holes can be one of above mentioned type s tars. The searches of the supermassive stars containing subquark s or other types of substituents of quarks and leptons ( subquark stars), heavy particles of the grand uniﬁcation also become a correc t search programs without any gravitational restrictions . In the next section a theory of quasars as the relativistic st ars or relativistic galaxy nucleus will be presented as the direct consequence of correctly treated ge neral relativity without any additional hypotheses. 6 General relativity as the theory of quasars Quasi Stellar Objects ( quasars ) in astrophysics deﬁned as the point sources of emission with high values of redshift of their spectral lines. Last version of Veron’s catalog [5] include more than 13200 q uasars with z <5.8. Since the stellar redshift was restricted at z <0.2 in black hole treatments of general relativity with maximal value for the neutron stars, a standard interpretat ion of quasar’s high redshift mechanism was only the cosmological Doppler redshift. In this interpretation the luminosities of quasars, which sizes are very small with respect to galaxies ( <1ps), nevertheless 103÷104times exceed the luminosities of galaxies. The distances then must be (0 .1÷5)·109ps. Many of quasars have broad emission lines and some of them ha ve also absorbtion lines with suﬃciently less values of redshi fts than emission lines of the same quasar. At such fantastic parameters some of quasars are variable and their luminosities changed 2 ÷3 times during of few days, weeks or years which probably leads to the contradicti ons with causality. In our treatment of relativistic stars all restrictions to s uperdense states and to redshifts disappear. We can demonstrate this new situation how the redshift restric tion of previous treatments disappears in our case. In an inequality (see §11.6 [1]): /radicalbig g00(0)≤γ1/2(R0)−rg 2R3 0/integraldisplayR′dR′ [1−2GMR′2 c2R3 0]1/2(48) after the calculation of the integral with limits ( R0, rg(e)), where rg(e)is some ”eﬀective ” gravitational radius inside of the star, we have: /radicalbig g00(0)≤3 2γ1/2(R0)−1 2[1−rgr2 g(e) R3 0]1/2(49) Ifrg(e)= 0 we obtain 8 −9β≥0 due to a property/radicalbig g00(0)>0 and the inequality β=rg/R0<8/9 and then we come to the standard redshift restriction z <2. But since in our treatment 0 < rg(e)≤rg, then in fact we have: 8−9β+η2β3≥0 (50) where η=rg(e)/rg>0 and 0 < β≤1 for the ﬁnite mass sources. This inequality is obeyed at any value ofη >0 and therefore, in general relativity in fact not exist any restriction for t he values of z. Two statements of new theory of relativistic stars, the ﬁrst that the superdense matter not collapsed but formed new types of stars and galaxy nucleus and, the second t hat no restrictions for stellar and extragalactic objects redshifts, lead to the new general relativistic the ory of quasars as the relativistic galaxy nucleus and (probably) as relativistic stars in the Milky Way. The main mechanism of high redshift of quasars from the point of view of general relativity is the gravitational redshift since they are supercompact objects with sizes near their gr avitational radii and they7 THE GENERAL RELATIVISTIC COSMOLOGY WITHOUT SINGULARITY 10 haveβ= 1−ε, where ε≪1. In the case of galaxy nucleus the cosmological Doppler red shift must be separated from the full redshift by some astrophysical meth ods and then the gravitational part of redshift can be determined, or conversely, if we can estimate indepen dently the gravitational redshift then we can more exactly deﬁne the Doppler part and then can determine th e true distances. But in both cases the distances, luminosities and masses of extragalactic quasa rs become 104−105times less than modern standard estimations and they become normal with respect to the analo gous parameters of galaxy nucleus. This fact show the ﬁrst normalization role of our treatment for the ast rophysics of quasars. The redshift diﬀerences between absorbtion and emission li nes easily explained by an existence of ab- sorbing layers at surface of relativistic objects since sma ll diﬀerence of radii (few percent from rg) between layers leads to large redshift diﬀerences (∆ z∼0.1÷1.0). Up to now quasars considered only as extragalactic large dis tance and very massive (109÷1012M⊙) objects since only the Doppler shift explanation of their re dshift. If we treat the redshift mainly as the gravitational one, then it will be not wonderful from the poi nt of view of general relativity if in the case of some quasars the full observed redshift may be only gravitational redshift . Such quasars may be in the local group of galaxies and here we can obtain a useful inform ation about the dynamics and the structure of quasars, and obviously, about the galaxies evolution. New in principle prediction of the present version of genera l relativity consists in the possibility of the ﬁnding of quasars in the Milky Way as the relativistic stars w ith high redshifts but with the ordinary stellar masses, luminosities and distances. The particle content of such small quasars is not suﬃcient fo r our purposes in this paper since the same value of redshift may be in the case of various relativistic stars with diﬀerent particles (neutrons, hyperons, quarks) and masse s (5÷100M⊙). The searches of such quasars in the Galaxy or identiﬁcation of some known quasars (in equato rial zone of the Galaxy) as relativistic stars will be very important for veriﬁcation of the present treatm ent of general relativity. The details of the proposed theory of quasars and the compari sons with observations will be published in the special paper [6]. 7 The general relativistic cosmology without singularity Let we consider Einstein’s D= 3 sphere which embedded to D= 4 space as an orbital hypersurface. Let this 3-sphere contains a homogeneous dust matter at a radial dist anceafrom a center of gravity in 4-dimension with respect to which the spherical symmetry is deﬁned. The d ust matter has a static gravitational ﬁeld and the 5-dimensional line element in this case is: ds2=eν(a)c2dt2−eλ(a)da2−a2dΩ2(χ, θ, ϕ ) (51) where the line element on the 3-sphere is: dΩ2(χ, θ, ϕ ) =dχ2+ sin2χ(dθ2+ sin2θ·dϕ2) (52) The solutions of the 5-dimensional Einstein equations can b e directly obtained with the result: eν(a)=e−λ(a)= 1−α2 a2≡Φ(a) (53) where αis a gravitational radius of the static ﬁeld in 4-dimensiona l space. Then the ﬁnal form of the line element is: ds2= Φ(a)c2dt2−da2 Φ(a)−a2dΩ2(χ, θ, ϕ ) (54) A conserved energy for the free falling from inﬁnity (or movi ng away from the center) sample particles on the 3D-spherical orbits is: E=M0c2Φ1/2 /radicalbig 1−v2/c2=M0c2/radicalBigg 1−α2/a2 1−v2/c2=M0c2(55)8 STRINGS AND BRANES WITHOUT HORIZONS AND SINGULARITIES 11 Therefore, exactly same as in the case of Schwarzschild ﬁeld in the previous sections, we can use this energy conservation condition for the determining of a prop er time ( dτ= Φ1/2dt) dependence of radial coordinate a(τ) as: da Φ1/2cdτ=v c=α a(56) and ±cdτ=ada αΦ1/2=1 αa2da√ a2−α2(57) The resulting equation of motion is: cτ=±α 2[β−2Φ1/2+ ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleβ−1(1 + Φ1/2)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle] (58) where β=α/a, and a constant of integration taken such that τ= 0 at a=α. The Universe can be considered as D= 3 spheric dust matter in D= 4 space which spherically falled and then reﬂected from the own center of gravity in 4-dimensi on. This center of gravity in term of radial coordinate ais locate at a=α. Then, after some time this dust matter fall again and the pro cess repeated. A velocity of falling and expansion of the sample particles w hich start falling from the inﬁnity is a critical velocity . If the present velocity of expansion less than the critical velocity, we have a closed model and the expansion will be stopped at ﬁnite scale parameter and then t he falling will be repeated. The physical scale parameter in this model is: ap=/integraldisplayda/radicalBig 1−α2 a2=a/radicalbigg 1−α2 a2(59) We have ap= 0 at a0=αwhich means the reﬂection of falling sample particles from t he gravitational radius and the picture is qualitatively same as in the case of Schwarzschild ﬁeld. We see that our model is a new dynamical version of Einstein-F riedman cosmological models without the problems with the singularity and with a natural mechanism o f oscillations. In this model a new type of the cosmological redshift appear d ue to a 4-dimensional gravitational potential diﬀerence in moments t0when a photon was emitted and at moment t1when it received: ω1 ω0=Φ1/2 0 Φ1/2 1=/radicalbig 1−β2 0/radicalbig 1−β2 1(60) This additional gravitational redshift can seriously modi ﬁed the Doppler redshift value of zat large distances and at z >1. Particularly, taking into account this eﬀect the volume o f the Universe can be decreased and a density of matter can be increased which can l eads to the partly solution of the dark matter problem. In the considered model the main cosmological problems can b e naturally solved or can be better under- stood on the basis of the ﬁrst principles of general relativi ty. More detail discussion will be presented in the forthcoming publications. 8 Strings and branes without horizons and singularities The standard quantum ﬁeld theory describe on a continual spacetime the localinteractions of point particles, but it leads to the inﬁnities of the values of physical observ ables. The attempts of exclude these inﬁnities by an introduction of the discrete spacetime or nonlocal int eractions of local objects not coincided with the requirements of special relativistic causality. The more successful paradigm which is very popular at last ti me based on an introduction of the nonlocal fundamental objects withlocal interactions , such as strings and branes. But this paradigm also contains the intrinsic contradictions since after an exclusion of one cl ass of inﬁnities it nevertheless not leads to a ﬁnite theory. It force introduce another type inﬁnities in form of the singularities which appear due to the black holetype solutions.9 THE RENORMALIZATION IN FIELD THEORY AS A GRAVITATIONAL EFF ECT 12 In the standard treatment of general relativity a ﬁnite mass point particle ”live” inside of own gravitational radius and therefore, each point particle must be really the microscopic ”black hole” with a ﬁnite size horizon. This fact was not suﬃcient for the perturbative quantum ﬁeld theory since this theory not pretended to an exact and correct description of gravitational degrees of f reedom. In the cases of strings and branes the situation with such ﬁni te ”gravitational thicknesses” of the funda- mental objects is most serious because of the paradigm prete nd to the exact taking into account of classical and quantum properties of gravitation. The ﬁniteness of var iables and the locality of interactions can not be preserved in string-brane paradigm due to the ”Troyan Horse ” of gravitation in form of black hole solutions with horizons and intrinsic singularities. Our new treatment of general relativity therefore can rescu e the theories of strings and branes from diﬃculties with new generations of inﬁnities. In our treatm ent no horizons, no singularities, the interactions of point particles are local in term of physical distances an d the same will be in the case of strings and branes local interactions. As result, both starting advant ages of the strings and branes, - the ﬁniteness of observables and the local character of interactions, can be preserved. 9 The renormalization in ﬁeld theory as a gravitational eﬀec t In this section we show that the renormalizational procedur es of the standard quantum ﬁeld theory have a gravitational origin and that they can be considered as the m ethods which allow us taking into account a gravitational eﬀects at small distances. A size of localization region of quantum particle is inverse proportional to an energy ∆ Eof quantum ﬂuctuations ∆ x∼¯hc/∆E, while ”a gravitational radius” rg= 2G∆E/c4which coincides with such energy concentration is proportional to the energy. These two curv es intersect at Planck length lpland at Planck energy Epl. Before Planck scale (∆ x > l p) the wave lengths of quantum ﬂuctuations of particles excee d the ”gravitational radii” of particles (∆ x > l p> rg). Here the ordinary quantum theory works successfully without the gravitational corrections. If we consider the quantum ﬂuctuations with the size of local ization less than Planck length ∆ x < l p and with the energy ∆ E > E pl, here the situation is diﬀerent since rg> lp>∆xand we can not simply ignore the gravitational eﬀects. Moreover, such high energ y virtual particles can be considered as the virtual microquasars . From the point of view of the new treatment, a spatial radial d istance \|x1−x2\|=ρbetween two points x1 andx2in a propagator and a vertex function of a ﬁnite energy quantu m point particle contains a ”physical” partρgand a constant ”unphysical” part rg(the gravitational radius) i.e. ρ=ρg+rg. Thus, we must shift low limits of integration in space-time integrals from ρ= 0 to ρ=rg.As result, we have a simple cutting at rgof the low limits of spacetime integrals of loop amplitudes w hich naturally excludes the divergencies in the values of observables. We can illustrate this procedure on a simple self energy diag ram for electron in quantum electrodynamics. Let a momentum of electron at initial time is p, at intermediate time qand a momentum of virtual photon isk. The self energy amplitude contains integrals: G=/integraldisplay d4kd4qF(k, q, p)(/integraldisplay d4ρei(p−k−q)·ρ) (61) If limits of spacetime integral over ρare (0 ,∞), then the integral equal to momentum conservation δ- function, which remove one of momentum integrations. The se cond momentum integral preserved and it is divergent. But after the gravitational source shift procedure and inte gration over physical distance ρg, low limit in spacetime integration is rgand the self energy is ﬁnite if we take rg∼lp: Gg=/integraldisplay d4kd4qF(k, q, p)· \|I(k, q, p)\|y=∞ y=rg(62) Such corrections not so great in comparison with bare parame ters. For example, the second order corrections to the self energy and the charge of electron aft er such cutting at rg=lpare approximately 10% from the physical mass mand the charge eof electron. Therefore, the bare mass and charge of electron are ∼(0,8÷0,9) from physical ones.10 CONCLUSION 13 If we want deal with δ-function for calculational simpliﬁcations, we can write o ld divergent self energy integrals, but then we must substract a unphysical part of sp acetime integral with limits (0 , rg): Gg=/integraldisplay d4kd4qF(k, q, p)·/bracketleftBig \|I\|y=∞ y=0− \|I\|y=rg y=0/bracketrightBig (63) We see that this is exactly the renormalization procedure. T herefore, we can conclude, that the appearing of divergencies is the result of ignoration of gravitationa l eﬀects and the renormalization the method of taking into account the natural gravitational cutting at small dis tances. 10 Conclusion In the present paper we consider a revised version of general relativity where the ”revision” consists only in consideration of physically measurable geometric variabl es and in the excluding of unphysical ones. The Schwarzschild’s world in physical variables becomes si mple and normal from a point of view of traditional physics. Falling matter normally scatters on t he source. The interior of the horizon, collapse, irreversibility and singularity are disappear, an evapora tion make no sense [4]. Only methods and results retain their validity in general relativity which work with an exterior region of the gravitational radius and not use unphysical variables of the interior region. The general relativity in combination with particle physic s predicts new families of relativistic stars and quasars instead of black holes. The disappearing of the cosm ological singularity leads to the cosmological models with oscillating Universe. Taking into account the g ravitational requirements we obtain the solution of the problem of inﬁnities in quantum ﬁeld theory. New treatment of general relativity can be experimentally t ested, for example, by nonredshift measure- ments of distances to quasars. References [1] Weinberg S. (1972) Gravitation and cosmology. J.Wiley, N.Y. [2] Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M. (1988) The classical Theory o f Fields. M. [3] Zakir Z. One topological secret of gravitation and its su rprises for astrophysics, cosmology and particle physics. 7 p. In ”Structure of space-time. part II”, Tashken t, 2000, paper 16. (arXiv, physics/0005009; see also: physics/0005016). [4] Zakir Z. (2000) Structure of space-time. parts I and II (i n preparation). [5] Veron P. et al. (2000) Catalog of quasars (http://cdsweb .u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/Cat?VII/215) [6] Zakir Z. (2000) General relativistic theory of quasars. (in preparation).
arXiv:physics/0007004v1 [physics.atom-ph] 4 Jul 2000Spectroscopic electric-ﬁeld measurement in laser-excite d plasmas S. K. Dutta, D. Feldbaum, G. Raithel University of Michigan, Physics Department, Ann Arbor, MI 4 8109-1120 (February 2, 2008) The electric ﬁeld in mm-sized clouds of cold Rb+-ions is measured using the Stark eﬀect of Rydberg atoms embed- ded in the ion clouds. The ion clouds are produced by UV photoionization of laser-cooled rubidium atoms in a magnet o- optic trap. In very dense ion clouds, the Rydberg atom ex- citation spectra reﬂect the presence of a neutral plasma cor e and a positively charged ion shell. 32.60.+i, 52.70.-m, 32.80.Pj Highly excited Rydberg atoms [1] are very sensitive to static and AC electric and magnetic ﬁelds, and can be used for the spectroscopic detection and compensation of such ﬁelds. Rydberg atoms have been used to detect microwave and FIR radiation [2], to measure and to com- pensate weak static electric ﬁelds [3], and to study QED level shifts and cavity-QED eﬀects involving only few mi- crowave photons [4]. The spectroscopy of Rydberg atoms has been employed to diagnose electric ﬁelds in DC and high-frequency discharge plasmas [5]. In this paper, we use Rydberg atom spectroscopy to determine the electric ﬁeld in millimeter-sized, strongly coupled plasmas that since recently can be generated by the laser excitation of laser-cooled clouds of atoms [6]. These plasmas hold the promise of bearing novel low-temperature recombi- nation [7] and oscillation [8] behavior. Further, there is evidence for a Mott transition, by which strongly-coupled plasmas and/or dense gases of Rydberg atoms may form a new state of highly excited, metastable matter [9]. To investigate these and other issues, one could utilize the non-invasive ﬁeld-measurement method employed in the present paper. Our experiment has recently been described [10]. In a two-step optical excitation, laser-cooled rubidium atoms conﬁned in a volume <1mm3are ﬁrst excited from the ground state 5 S1/2to the 5 P3/2state, which has an ionization wavelength of λion= 479 .1nm. A UV laser pulse ( λUV= 355nm, duration <10ns, pulse energy up to 10mJ) then partially ionizes the 5 P3/2-atoms, produc- ing photoelectrons with 0.9eV initial kinetic energy. The photoelectrons escape on a time scale of a few ns, leav- ing behind a cloud of slow Rb+-ions. About 23ns after the UV pulse and while the lower-step laser is still on, the remaining 5 P3/2-atoms that are embedded in the ion plasma are excited by a blue dye laser pulse ( λ≈480nm, duration <10ns, bandwidth ≈10GHz). The ion cloud does not signiﬁcantly expand before the blue pulse ar- rives. The blue pulse excites bound Rydberg states, theStark eﬀect of which we use to measure the plasma elec- tric ﬁelds. We detect the Rydberg atoms using the mechanism explained in the following. The ion plasma represents an electron trap with a depth U0given by the ion number, the cloud size and the proﬁle of the charge distribution [6]. In most of our experiments U0<0.9eV, in which case no or only few UV-generated photoelectrons are retained in the electron trap (the ones that are moderated to low enough energy on their way out). However, the plasma electron trap becomes populated with electrons of about 10meV energy due to direct photoionization of 5 P3/2- atoms by the ASE with λ < λ ioncontained in the blue laser pulse and due to thermal ionization of a fraction of the bound Rydberg atoms excited by the blue pulse [10]. Within a few µs,l-changing collisions between the trapped electrons and the Rydberg atoms eﬃciently pro- mote the latter into long-lived high- /angbracketleftl/angbracketrightstates. During the subsequent Coulomb expansion of the plasma, which typ- ically takes a few tens of µs, the depth U0of the plasma electron trap approaches zero. During that time, the electrons trapped in the plasma are gradually released, producing a plasma decay signal in our microchannel- plate (MCP) electron detector, which is located about 10cm from the atomic cloud. A large fraction of the sur- viving high- lRydberg atoms thermally ionize on a time scale of order 10ms [10], which exceeds the plasma decay time by about a factor of thousand. The delayed ther- mal electrons originating in the high- lRydberg atoms are counted in a gate that starts well after the plasma decay, yielding a noise-free signal of the Rydberg atom excitation. Rydberg excitation spectra are obtained by recording the delayed electron counts as a function of the wavelength of the blue laser. Fig. 1 shows a typical experimental Rydberg excitation spectrum of atoms in an electric-ﬁeld-bearing plasma. The ﬁeld manifests itself through a) the appearance of p- and hydrogenic lines, labeled pandhin Fig. 1, b) termination of the discrete Rydberg series at a certain ﬁeld-dependent value of the principal quantum number n, and c) continuum lowering. While the eﬀects a) and b) are solely determined by the state of the ion plasma at the time instant of the Rydberg excitation, the feature c) also depends on the history of the Rydberg atoms after their excitation. Since we intend to analyze the plasma at the time instant of the Rydberg atom excitation, we disregard the feature c) as a ﬁeld measurement tool. We also don’t use b), because we have found that in many of our spectra the laser linewidth terminates the Rydberg 1series, but not the electric ﬁeld. 479 480 481 482 483 484 48523s23d n~45λionElectron counts (arb. un.) λ (nm) 481.3 481.8ddd phsphs λ (nm)phsdpd-gaps 482.0482.5dd d d hshs ppd p pd λ (nm)d hspmid-gaps 483 484hs λ (nm) hshs-gaps FIG. 1. Experimental Rydberg excitation spectrum of 87Rb 5P 3/2atoms embedded in a laser-generated ion plasma. The three types of spectral ranges with low oscillator stren gth, denoted hs-,mid- andpd-gaps, become ﬁlled in at certain crit- ical wavelengths that depend on the strength of the plasma electric ﬁeld. The detail plots in the lower row show how we determine the critical wavelengths. The features of the above type a) develop as follows. Asnis increased, the electric ﬁeld ﬁrst manifests itself in the appearance of p-lines and of triangular-shaped h-features (see Fig. 1), caused by electric-ﬁeld-induced state mixing. Due to the linear Stark eﬀect, the hydro- genic states fan out over an energy range 3 n2E(atomic units) ( [1] and Fig. 2). As nincreases further, the h- features progressively expand and ﬁll in the spectral gaps of originally zero oscillator strength between the discret e non-hydrogenic s-,p- and d-lines. There are three types of such spectral gaps, which we label hs-,mid- and pd- gaps. The gaps become ﬁlled in with signiﬁcant oscillator strength in exactly that order, at quite well deﬁned crit- ical wavelengths. Those wavelengths can be readily con- verted into critical eﬀective quantum numbers nhs,nmid, andnpd. The niare robust indicators for the electric ﬁeld, because they are solely determined by the general spreading behavior of the quasi-continuous h-features. No absolute line strength or line-strength ratio needs to be determined. Assuming a constant electric ﬁeld E0, the values of niat which the spectral gaps become ﬁlled in can be related to E0using the Stark map of Rb. As shown in Fig. 2, the hs-gap below the hydrogenic levels with princi- pal quantum number ndisappears when the energy shift of the most red-shifted hydrogenic state, which is approx- imately −3n2E0/2, equals the splitting 0 .13n−3between the unshifted hydrogenic energy and the next-lower s- state. Further, Fig. 2 shows that the mid-gaps, i.e. the gaps between the states ( n+ 3)sand (n+ 1)dand be-tween the ﬁeld-free hydrogenic states n−1 and the states (n+ 2)p, become entirely covered with hydrogenic states at practically identical electric ﬁelds. Finally, the pd-gaps disappear when neighboring hydrogenic manifolds meet, i.e. when 3 n2E0=n−3. The relations between E0and the critical quantum numbers ni0are obtained as E0= 0.086n−5 hs0 E0= 0.23n−5 mid0 E0= 0.33n−5 pd0(atomic units) . (1) The zeros in the subscripts indicate that these relations hold for a constant electric ﬁeld. Atomic species with quantum defects diﬀerent from Rb would follow similar relations with diﬀerent numerical factors. Further, the Eqs. 1 share, as expected, the n−5dependence of the familiar Inglis-Teller relation [11]. -0.0014-0.00135-0.0013-0.00125 0 5 10-81 10-71.5 10-72 10-7Energy (at. un.) E0 (at.un.)23s 21d 22p20 hyd. 19 hyd.hs-gap closes here mid-gaps close here pd-gap closes here FIG. 2. Stark map of Rb in the vicinity of the n= 19 and n= 20 hydrogenic manifolds. To model our experimental spectra, we have calculated the photoabsorption spectra S(E0, λ) of randomly ori- ented atoms in constant electric ﬁelds E0. Since from the 5Pintermediate state we excite three manifolds of the magnetic quantum number \|m\|, one spectrum S(E0, λ) is a properly weighted sum of an m= 0, an m= 1 and an m= 2 spectrum. The spectra are obtained as outlined in [12] using a spherical basis set of all states up to n= 90. To account for the laser linewidth, the spectra are convo- luted with Gaussians of a few GHz FWHM. The calcu- lated spectra, one of which is shown in Fig. 3 a), display the same qualitative features as our experimental spec- tra. This applies, in particular, to the triangular shape of the h-features, which is produced by the unresolved excitation of the states in the hydrogenic manifolds. An investigation of the calculated photoexcitation spectra reveals that the closing of the pd-gap appears particularly sudden due to the following peculiarity: for parameters between the mid-gap and the pd-gap closing, indicated by a double-arrow in Fig. 2, the blue-shifting hydrogenic levels within the pd-gap, marked with open circles in Fig. 2, carry much less oscillator strength than 2all the other nearby hydrogenic levels. As a result, the whole pd-gap appears virtually oscillator-strength-free up until the pd-gap closing condition 3 n2E0≥n−3is satis- ﬁed. Once the pd-gap closing condition is satisﬁed, the oscillator strength of the hydrogenic states inside the pd- gap increases rather abruptly. This behavior enhances the clarity of the pd-gap closing. 480.5 481 481.5 482 482.5 483 483.5 484 λ (nm)480.5 481 481.5 482 482.5 483 483.5 484 pd mid hsλ (nm) a) b) FIG. 3. Calculated isotropic excitation spectra of87Rb 5P atoms into Rydberg states. Panel a) is for a homogeneous electric ﬁeld E0= 6×10−9at. un.= 31V/cm. Panel b) shows the excitation spectrum - upside down - in a Gaussian cloud of 4×105Rb+ions that has a most probable electric ﬁeld of Emax= 31V/cm. The arrows mark the critical wavelengths where the spectral gaps of low oscillator strength become ﬁl led in. The electric ﬁeld experienced by the 5 P3/2-atoms is not homogeneous but follows a probability distribution P(E). Assuming identical Gaussian density proﬁles for the ions and the 5 P3/2-atoms embedded in between them, the dis- tribution P(E) can be calculated by a random placement of ion charges and 5 P3/2-atoms using a radial distribution function P(r) = 4 πr2(2πσ2)−3/2exp(−r2/(2σ2)). The resultant ﬁeld distributions P(E) have well deﬁned most probable electric ﬁelds Emax, which practically coincide with the singularities of the distributions produced by the corresponding smoothed charge distributions (compare the solid and dotted curves in Fig. 4). The eﬀect of the microﬁelds of the discrete ion charges largely is to smear out the singularities produced by the smoothed charge distributions, adding ﬁelds signiﬁcantly larger than Emax to the ﬁeld distribution. Deviations of the density pro- ﬁles of the ions and the 5 P3/2-atoms from Gaussians will modify P(E), a dominant peak of P(E). However, a most probable ﬁeld Emaxand a microﬁeld-induced tail of ﬁelds E > E maxwill remain. We have used simulated electric-ﬁeld distributions P(E) to form averages of the spectra S(E0, λ) weighted byP(E). As shown in panel b) of Fig. 3, one can still eas- ily obtain critical quantum numbers nhs,nmid, and npd at which the respective regions of low oscillator strength disappear. The excitation spectra a) and b) in Fig. 3 are, in fact, quite similar, because the P(E) are clearly dominated by ﬁelds near the most probable one. The microﬁeld-induced spread of P(E) from Emaxtowardshigher ﬁelds causes the spectral gaps with low oscillator strength to become ﬁlled in at values of nthat are slightly lower than in the case of a homogeneous ﬁeld E0=Emax. 0 2 10-94 10-96 10-98 10-91 10-8 E (at. un.)P(E) (arb. un.) FIG. 4. Electric-ﬁeld distributions P(E) in Gaussian ion clouds with N= 4×105andσ= 0.2mm. Solid: Distribution obtained by random placement of discrete ion charges follow - ing a Gaussian density distribution. Dotted: Field distrib u- tion of the corresponding continuous charge density. Dashed: Holtsmark distribution of the microﬁelds in a neutral plasm a with the same ion density as in the center of the above Gaus- sian ion cloud. Evaluating a number of spectra as shown in Fig. 3 b), we have determined the relations between the most probable ﬁelds Emaxand the critical eﬀective quantum numbers nhs,nmid, and npdfor Rydberg atoms excited in Gaussian ion clouds with a FWHM of about 1mm: Emax= 0.050n−5 hs Emax= 0.145n−5 mid Emax= 0.26n−5 pd(atomic units) , (2) We have used Eqs. 2 to experimentally determine the values of Emaxin ion clouds with diameters of ∼1mm and various ion numbers. The spectra obtained in a few such experiments are displayed in Fig. 5. The critical wavelengths, indicated by arrows, have been determined as shown in Figs. 1 and 3, and have been converted into critical quantum numbers nhs,nmidandnpd. Using Eq. 2, up to three spectroscopic measurements of Emax are obtained for each spectrum. The relative uncertainty of each single electric-ﬁeld value is 30%. Within that un- certainty, the diﬀerent electric-ﬁeld values obtained for the individual spectra agree well. The electric ﬁeld val- ues quoted in Fig. 5 are the averages over all ﬁeld values obtained for the respective spectra. The most probable ﬁeld Emaxin Gaussian ion clouds can be calculated as Emax= (3.1×10−10Nionσ−2)Vm, with the RMS cloud size σand ion number Nion. We have independently deduced Nionfrom measurements of the MOT ﬂuorescence. The values of σcould be deter- mined from cuts through CCD images of the atom cloud ﬂuorescence, yielding values of σranging from 0.3mm to 0.5mm. For large atom clouds, we have found that the measured ﬁelds exceed the calculated ones by up to a 3factor of ten. As the atom cloud size is decreased, the discrepancy drops to about a factor of two. The ﬁelds deduced from the spectra are, of course, the ones to be trusted. The most likely explanation for the discrepancy and its dependence on the size of the atomic cloud is that the ions were actually not excited in the whole atomic cloud, but were concentrated in a signiﬁcantly smaller volume determined by the diameters of the excitation laser pulses. 480 484480 484480 484 mid pdhs pd midhs pdmidhs mid 480 482 484 Nion=2800000 σ=0.30 mmNion=630000 σ=0.30 mmNion=360000 σ=0.34 mmNion=280000 σ=0.45 mm 59V/cm33V/cm24V/cm12V/cmNion=100000 σ=0.52 mm480 482 484E l e c t r o n c o u n t s ( a r b . u n . )No UV 480 482 484 λ (nm) FIG. 5. Experimental excitation spectra of87Rb 5P 3/2 atoms embedded in photo-excited plasmas that contain the indicated numbers Nionof Rb+-ions. The σ-parameters of the utilized Gaussian clouds of laser-cooled atoms are also sho wn. The most probable electric ﬁelds Emax, shown on the right, are spectroscopically determined and carry an uncertainty of about 20%. If the number of ions in a Gaussian cloud exceeds 7.8×105mm−1σ, the potential depth U0of the ion plasma exceeds 0 .9eV, and a fraction of the UV-excited photo- electrons will be retained [6]. This is clearly the case in the lowest two spectra of Fig. 5, where we exceed the critical ion number by factors >2.5 and >10, respec- tively. If the fraction of retained electrons is large, a macroscopically close-to-neutral plasma core is formed, which is surrounded by a positively charged ionic shell. The electric ﬁeld in the core is close to zero, while theshell carries a large electric ﬁeld. The distribution P(E) will thus become bi-modal, featuring a peak near E= 0 and a high-ﬁeld peak. Rydberg atoms excited in the shell produce the spectroscopic ﬁeld signatures discussed in this paper, while atoms excited in the core contribute a low-ﬁeld excitation spectrum with resolved Rydberg resonances up to large n. The excitation spectra shown in the two lowest plots of Fig. 5 appear, in fact, as su- perpositions of a high-ﬁeld and a low-ﬁeld spectrum, as expected for bi-modal distributions P(E). In the low- est curve, the high-ﬁeld component of P(E) apparently is strongly dominated by the low-ﬁeld one, making it hard to determine the value of the electric ﬁeld in the shell. The presence of a strong electric ﬁeld, can, how- ever, be guessed from the appearance of p-lines at long wavelengths. We note that in the case of perfect macroscopic neu- trality of the core the microﬁelds in the core would fol- low a Holtsmark distribution [13], as displayed in Fig. 4. For our charge carrier densities and laser linewidths, the Holtsmark ﬁelds are too low to be detectable. In this work, we have used spectroscopic tools to probe the electric ﬁelds in small, laser-excited plasmas. The technique has a large future potential: using crossed and focused Rydberg atom excitation beams, it will be pos- sible to perform spatially resolved measurements of the plasma electric ﬁelds. A variation of the time delay be- tween the UV pulse and the blue probe pulse will allow one to study the plasma expansion via the decay of the electric ﬁeld. The use of a laser with a narrow band- width ( ∼1MHz) will allow one to detect smaller ﬁelds, such as the Holtsmark ﬁelds, and to make precise mea- surements of the detailed electric-ﬁeld distribution P(E). Measurements of P(E) could reveal inhomogeneities and instabilities in the plasma, which are expected to pro- duce structures in P(E) at excessive ﬁelds. Spatial order in the charge carrier arrangement, such as Wigner crys- tals [14] and the formation of crystalline Rydberg matter [9] may become detectable via measurements of P(E). Support by NSF is acknowledged. We thank Prof. P. Bucksbaum for inspiring discussions and generous loan- ing of equipment. [1] T. F. Gallagher, Rydberg Atoms , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994. [2] T. W. Ducas, W. P. Spencer, A. G. Vaidyanathan, W. H. Hamilton, D. Kleppner, App. Phys. Lett. 35, 382 (1979), H. Figger, R. Straubinger, H. Walther, G.Leuchs, Opt. Comm. 33, 37 (1980), M. Gross, P. Goy, C. Fabre, S. Haroche, J. M. Raimond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 343 (1979). [3] J. Neukammer, H. Rinneberg, K. Vietzke, A. K¨ onig, H. 4Hieronymus, M. Kohl, H.-J. Grabka, G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2947 (1987). [4]Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics , ed. P. R. Berman (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego 1994). [5] B. N. Ganguly, J. Appl. Phys. 6], 571 (1986), J. R. Shoe- maker et. al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 2019 (1988), G. A. Hebner et. al., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4036 (1994). [6] T. C. Killian et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4776 (1999). [7] Y. Hahn, Phys. Lett. A 231 , 82 (1997). [8] D. H. E. Dubin, J. P. Schiﬀer, Phys. Rev. E 53, 5249 (1996). [9] E. A. Manykin, M. I. Ozhovan, P. P. Poluektov, Sov. Phys. JETP 57, 256 (1983), L. Homlid, E. A. Manykin, Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz. 111, 1601 (1997), R. Svensson, L. Holmlid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1739 (1999). [10] S. Dutta, D. Feldbaum, G. Raithel, submitted and LANL eprint http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0003109, (2000 ). [11] D. R. Inglis, E. Teller, J. Astrophys. 90, 439 (1939). [12] M. L. Zimmerman, M. G. Littman, M. M. Kash, D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. A 20, 2551 (1979). [13] S. Chandrasekhar, in Selected papers on noise and stochastic processes , ed. N. Wax (Dover, New York 1954). [14] S. Ichimaru, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 1017 (1982). 5
arXiv:physics/0007005v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 4 Jul 2000Comment on “Air bubbles in water: A strongly multiple scatte ring medium for acoustic waves” [Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6050, 2000] Z. Ye1, Y.-Y. Chen1, A. Alvarez2 1Department of Physics, National Central University, Chung li, Taiwan 320 2NATO Saclant Undersea Research Centre, Viale San Bartolome o 400 19138 La Spezia Italy. (October 13, 2013) In this communication, we would like to comment on some results in a recent Letter by Kafesaki et al. [1]. In [1], the authors stated “Up to now the extensive studies of bubbly water (or other bubbly liquids) have been analyzed in the framework of single scattering”. In fact, acoustic scattering by bubbles has also been studied in terms of multiple scattering both extensively and intensively in the literature. This includes both theoretical (e. g. [2–12]) and experimental works (e. g. [13,14]). The work of Foldy [15], Lax [16], Waterman et al. [17], and Twersky [18] serves as a solid foun- dation to the multiple scattering of acoustic waves by many scatterers in general. The textbook by Ishimaru [19] presents an excellent account of various theories about the multiple scattering. The authors further sug- gested “Thus, acoustic waves in bubbly liquids (espe- cially water), in addition to being very important per se, provide an almost ideal case for examining in detail the localization question”. We note that the research on multiple-scattering induced acoustic localization in random bubbly water is rich (e. g. [4,5,11,20–24]). It has been shown [11,23,24] that acoustic waves can be localized within a range of frequencies slightly above the natural frequency of an air-bubble in water, and the localization behavior is insensitive to the conﬁgu- ration of bubble clouds [22]. When waves are localized in bubbly water, a global coherent behavior appears. This is a distinct feature diﬀerentiating the localization eﬀect from residual absorption [24,26,27]. The localiza- tion disappears when the air-bubble volume fraction is lower than about 10−5, in agreement with an earlier prediction [4]. To the end of their Letter, Kafesaki [1] stated “The most signiﬁcant and novel results we obtained are shown in the panel of Fig. 3(b)...”. The results shown in their Fig. 3(b) are a natural extension of the re- sults of [11]. The formulation in [11] stems from the work of Foldy [15] and Twersky [18] and has been doc- umented in detail in [25,28]. The approach has also been compared favorably with others in certain situa- tions [25,28–30], and the results agree with the physical intuition (e. g. [31]). Though not exact, the approach is applicable for most frequencies considered in [1]. There will be a small inaccuracy when ωrs/cexceeds 0.45 and signiﬁcant inaccuracy is expected when ωrs/c >1. Using the formulations in [11,28] for acoustic trans- mission and using the formulation in [32] for comput- ing the acoustic band structure, we examine the results in Fig. 3 of [1]. It should be noted that the formula- tion in [11] only takes into account the pulsating mode, while the formulation in [28] incorporates all possiblevibrational modes of the bubbles. The two approaches agree well except at higher resonance frequencies of ωrs/c≈0.48 and 0 .77 [1]. Thus, in the following, the approach in [11] will be used. Employing the same parameters as in [1], we re- produce partial results in Fig. 1. For comparison, we show the result for a single random conﬁguration (a) and as well as the ensemble averaged result (b). It is clear that whether making ensemble average makes not much diﬀerence for ωrs/c0<0.6. In particular, the ensemble average basically plays no role for fre- quencies located around the complete band gap. Com- pared to Fig. 3 in [1], there are several diﬀerences. (1) The complete band gap is a little wider in the present case, but is consistent with a transmission calculation, following [22]. To further inspect the diﬀerence, we have also computed the band structures at the air void fraction of 10%, yielding nearly the same answer as in Fig. 1(a) of [1]. (2) In contrast to [1], the trans- mission in the present computation changes sharply at the frequencies slightly above the natural frequency of an air-bubble in water [2], which in fact leads to a ﬁrst order phase transition from the extended state to the localized state [22]. Exploring the diﬀerence, we have considered possible eﬀects of the locations of transmitting source and receiver on the transmis- sion, and ﬁnd that the transmission is insensitive to the positions of the transmitter and the receiver for frequencies between ωrs/c0= 0.0136 and about 0 .3, indicating that the discrepancy in the transmission be- havior between the present results and that from [1] is not caused by a diﬀerence in the source or receiver location. The transmission at frequencies higher than roughly ωrs/c0= 0.3, however, is indeed sensitive to the location of either transmitter or receiver. (3) In Fig. 3 of [1], the range of inhibited transmission coin- cides with the band gap, while in our case this is not the case. In addition, our results show that the ran- domness tends to smear out the transmission peak near the upper band edge, consistent with 2D cases [27]. At ﬁrst sight, the present inconsistency between the range of the band gap and the range of the inhibited trans- mission seems to suggest errors in our computation. But, in fact, the the disagreement is due to the eﬀect of the ﬁnite sample size. To elaborate, Fig. 2 shows the results for diﬀerent sizes of bubble clouds, where the eﬀect of ﬁnite sample size is obvious. The range of the transmission inhibition shall agree with the band gap when the sample size tends inﬁnity. When the multiple scattering is switched oﬀ, the eﬀect of ensemble average becomes more prominent, 1comparing the dotted lines in the right panels in Fig. 1(a) and (b). Again we see discrepancies with Fig. 3 in [1]. For example, the present result for the lattice case starts to ﬂat out at about ωrs/c0= 0.3, while that in [1] at about 0.4. The randomness tends to broad the transmission peak located around the natural frequency of the breathing mode of the air- bubble. The two transmission peaks at ωrs/c0= 0.48 and 0.77 shown in [1] are absent from the right panel of Fig. 1. This is because the results in Fig. 1 did not take into consideration higher vibrational modes. When the higher modes are considered using [28], the overall re- sults in the right panel of Fig. 1 will not change much, except that two sharp transmission peaks will appear as in Fig. 3(c) of [1]. Discussion with Dr. Pigang Luan is greatly appre- ciated. This work received support from National Sci- ence Council (Grant No. NSC-89-2112-M008-008 and NSC-89-2611-M008-002). [1] M. Kafesaki, R. S. Penciu, and E. N. Economou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6050 (2000). [2] P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of theoretical physics , McGraw-Hill, New York (1953). [3] K. W. Commander and A. Prosperetti, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.85, 732 (1989). [4] D. Sornette and B. Souillard, Europhys. Lett. 7, 269 (1988) [5] C. A. Condat, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 441 (1988). [6] A. S. Sangani, J. Fluid Mech. 232, 221 (1991). [7] Z. Ye and L. Ding, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1629 (1995). [8] C. Feuillade, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3412 (1996). [9] Z. Ye, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1239 (1997). [10] F. S. Henyey, J. Acoust. Soc. 105, 2149 (1999). [11] Z. Ye and A. Alvarez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3503 (1998). [12] S. Temkin, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 126 (2000). [13] E. Silberman, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29, 925 (1957). [14] M. Nicholas, R. A. Roy, L. A. Crum, H. Oguz, and A. Prosperetti, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3171 (1994). [15] L. L. Foldy, Phys. Rev. 67, 107 (1945). [16] M. Lax, Rev. Mod. Phys. 23, 287 (1951). [17] P. C. Waterman and R. Truell, J. Math. Phys. 2, 512 (1961). [18] V. Twersky, J. Math. Phys. 3, 700 (1962). [19] A. Ishimaru, Wave propagation and scattering in ran- dom media , Academic Press, New York (1978). [20] D. Weston, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39, 316 (1966). [21] I. Tolstoy and A. Tolstoy, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 1038 (1990). [22] Z. Ye and H. Hsu, cond-mat/0006352; H. Hsu, Local- ization of acoustic waves in bubbly water , M. Sc. thesis, 87NCU00198017, NCU (1999). [23] A. Alvarez and Z. Ye, Phys. Lett. A 252 , 53 (1999). [24] Z. Ye, H. Hsu, E. Hoskinson, and A. Alvarez, Chin. J. Phys.37, 343 (1999).[25] Z. Ye and C. Feuillade, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 798 (1997). [26] E. Hoskinson and Z. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2734 (1999). [27] e. g. Z. Ye and E. Hoskinson, cond-mat/0005183. [28] A. Alvarez, C. C. Wang, and Z. Ye, J. Comp. Phys. 154, 231 (1999). [29] Z. Ye and A. Alvarez, J. Comp. Acoust. ( in press ) [30] G. C. Gaunaurd and H. Huang, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 20, 285 (1995). [31] M. Strasburg, IEEE J. Ocean Eng. 21, 233 (1996). [32] M. S. Kushwaha, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10, 977 (1996); and reference therein. Figure 1 (a)Left panel . Acoustic bands in a sim- ple cubic array of air-bubbles in water. rsis the bubble radius, ωis the angular frequency and c0 is the water velocity in the water. Air volume fraction is 1%. Middle panel . Reduced trans- mission coeﬃcient through the bubble array in ordered (solid line) or one random (dotted line) placement. Right panel . The same as in the middle panel, but with the multiple scattering switched oﬀ. (b) The same as in (a), but the transmission in the case of random placement is averaged over 100 random conﬁgurations. Figure 2 The same as in Fig. 1, but for various sizes of bubble clouds in ordered placement (a) and as well as for one random arrangement (b). 20.00.20.40.60.8 0 2 lattice random Transmission 0 2 4Fig.1(a) lattice random 000 100 110 111ωrs/c0 Band Structure 0.00.20.40.60.8 0 2 4 lattice random Transmission 0 2 4 lattice random Fig.1(b) 000 100 110 111ωrs/c0 Band Structure 0.00.20.40.60.8 0 2 7x7x3 7x7x7 7x7x9 Transmission 0 2 4 7x7x3 7x7x7 7x7x9 Fig.2(a) 000 100 110 111ωrs/c0 Band Structure 0.00.20.40.60.8 0 2Fig.2(b) 7x7x3 7x7x7 7x7x9 Transmission 0 2 4 7x7x3 7x7x7 7x7x9 000 100 110 111ωrs/c0 Band Structure
arXiv:physics/0007006v1 [physics.geo-ph] 5 Jul 2000INSTANTANEOUS RESPONSE OF THE IONOSPHERE TO A SUDDEN COMMENCEMENT OF THE STRONG MAGNETIC STORM OF APRIL 6, 2000 E. L. Afraimovich, E. A. Kosogorov, L. A. Leonovich, O. S. Les yuta, and I. I. Ushakov Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Russian Academy o f Sciences, 664033 Post Box 4026, Irkutsk, Russia, e-mail:afra@iszf.i rk.ru ABSTRACT We developed a new technology for global detection of atmosp heric disturbances, on the basis of phase measurements of the total electron content (T EC) using an international GPS networks. Temporal dependencies of TEC are obtained for a se t of spaced receivers of the GPS network simultaneously for the entire set of visible sat ellites. These series are subjected to ﬁltering in the selected range of oscillation periods usi ng known algorithms for spatio-temporal analysis of signals. An ”instantaneous” i onospheric response to the sudden commencement of a strong magnetic storm of April 6, 2000 was d etected. On the dayside of the Earth the largest value of the net response amplitude was found to be of order 0 .8×1016 m−2(1–2% of the background TEC value), and the delay with respec t to the SC in mid-latitudes was about 200 s. In higher latitudes the delay goes as long as 15 min. On the nightside these values are 0 .2×1016m−2and 30 min, respectively. The velocity of the traveling disturbance from the middle to high latitudes on t he dayside as well as from the dayside to the nightside was about 10-20 km/s. INTRODUCTION Mid-latitude ionospheric eﬀects of geomagnetic disturban ces of diﬀerent origins were addressed in many publications, including a number of thorough reviews ( Hunsucker, 1982; Hocke and Schlegel, 1996). It is now a well-established fact that the auroral zon es of the northern and southern hemispheres generate acoustic-gravity waves (AGW) and tra veling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs), caused by them, of the type of solitary wave of about 1-hour du ration propagating in the equatorial direction with sound and subsonic speeds (from 100 to 300 m/s ). The occurrence delay τTIDs over various observing stations in mid-latitudes reaches 104s. The propagation velocity fundamentallydistinguishes the TIDs from sudden ionospheric disturbanc es (SIDs) which are a virtually instantaneous ( τno more than 10−3s) response of the dayside ionosphere to an increase in ultraviolet radiation intensity observed during chromosp heric ﬂares on the Sun (Mitra, 1974). The physical mechanisms for generation of the above-mentioned types of disturbances were discussed in a large number of theoretical publications, and are conside red to be relatively reliably established. By analyzing the ionospheric eﬀects from a strong magnetic s torm of April 6, 2000, we detected, most likely, a new manifestation of geomagnetic disturbanc es in the mid-latitude ionosphere implying an ”instantaneous” (compared to the above-mentio ned TID eﬀects) ionospheric response to the magnetic storm sudden commencement (SC). For detecti ng this eﬀect, we used a global spatial averaging of the variations in total electron conte nt (TEC) obtained from the data from the international GPS network. Currently (as of June 2000) this network includes at least 712 points, the data from which are posted to the INTERNET. High-precisi on measurements of the TEC along the line-of-sight (LOS) between the receiver on the ground a nd transmitters on the GPS system satellites covering the reception zone are made using two-f requency multichannel receivers of the GPS system at almost any point of the globe and at any time simu ltaneously at two coherently coupled frequencies f1= 1575 .42 MHz and f2= 1227 .60 MHz. The sensitivity of phase measurements in the GPS system is suﬃcient for detecting irr egularities with an amplitude of up to 10−3–10−4of the diurnal TEC variation. This makes it possible to formu late the problem of detecting ionospheric disturbances from diﬀerent sources of artiﬁcial and natural origins. RESULTS OF OBSERVATIONS For the time interval 16:00-18:00 UT, Fig. 1 presents the var iations in magnetic ﬂux (a), 5 MeV proton ﬂux (b) at geostationary orbit of the GOES10 station ( 135◦W), and of the H-component of the magnetic ﬁeld at station Irkutsk (52 .2◦N; 104.3◦E- c) for April 6, 2000. The time of the geomagnetic disturbance SC, determined from these data and from the data from other ground-based magnetic observatories, including those loc ated in the western hemisphere (on the dayside), corresponds to 16:42 (16.7) UT. The time of SC is sh own on panels (a-e) by a vertical dashed line. The geometry of the part of the global GPS networ k that was used in this study when analyzing the ionospheric response to the SC of the strong ma gnetic storm of April 6, 2000 (180 stations), is presented in Fig. 2a. Dots correspond to the lo cation of GPS stations; we do not give here their coordinates for reasons of space. The upper scale indicates the local time LT, corresponding to the time 16 UT. As is evident from Fig. 2a, ou r selected set of GPS stations cover reasonably densely North America and Europe, and much less d ensely the Asian part of the territory used in the analysis. An even smaller number of GPS stations are in the Paciﬁc and Atlantic Oceans. However, coverage of the territory with pa rtial LOS to the satellites for our selected limitations to the LOS elevations θ¿ 10◦is substantially wider. Panel b shows the coordinates of subionospheric points for the height of the F 2-layer maximum hmax= 300 km for all satellites visible at the SC time for each of the GPS stations marked on panel a (a total of 746 beams). An analysis of the TEC data from the selected GPS stat ions revealed that almost all stations over the time interval 16:30-17:30 UT, containing the SC time, show a single negative disturbance of about 20-min duration. Upon removing the tre nd and smoothing with a time window of 30 min, we were able to determine for each beam to the satellite the amplitude A and the time tminat which a minimum TEC value was attained. Fig. 3 presents the latitudinal dependencies (obtained for each beam) of the tmin-a) and of the amplitude A - b) of the ionospheric response to the magnetic storm SC, as well as the distributions of tmin- c) and A - d) as a function of local time LT. The SC time is shown in panels e a nd j by a horizontal straight line. Thick curves show the approximating dependencies obtained from all counts using polynomials of degree 4. The scatter of the position of tminis due to the fact that when the trend is removed witha time window of 30 min, the response to the SC is always overla pped by existing TEC oscillations with similar periods and with a random phase. Therefore, ide ntifying the response requires a coherent combination of TEC variations for all LOS. The resu lt of such a global spatial averaging of dI(t) for 511 LOS on the dayside is shown in panel d. A simila r result for 235 LOS on the nightside is presented in panel e. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS An analysis of the data in Fig. 1 suggests the conclusion that the ionospheric response to the SC has the form of a single negative disturbance of about 20-min duration. On the dayside of the Earth the largest value of the net response amplitude was fou nd to be of order 0 .8×1016m−2 (1–2% of the background TEC value), and the delay with respec t to the SC in mid-latitudes was about 200 s. In higher latitudes the delay goes as long as 15 mi n. On the nightside these values are 0.2×1016m−2and 30 min, respectively. Of special note is that the onset of negative TEC disturbance on the dayside, marked according to the level of 0.5 from a maximum deviation (panel d), coincides with the magnetic ﬂux SC (panel a) and is 120 s ah ead of the SC time determined from the data from ground-based magnetic observatories. Th e velocity of the traveling disturbance from middle to high latitudes as well as from the dayside to th e nightside is estimated at about 10-20 km/s. Thus our detected disturbance (a global delay τno more than 102- 103s) is inexplicable in terms of the AGW model, and it should be sough t when modeling a electromagnetic set of phenomena accompanying a strong geomagnetic disturb ance. It is not improbable that in the analysis of the mechanism it would be useful to take into acco unt some important characteristics of the ”global detector” which we are using, such as primarily t he sensitivity, continuity and global character. However, it may well be of crucial importance tha t, unlike conventional techniques of ionospheric observations, the altitude limit of which does not exceed 500 km (ionosondes, HF Doppler measurements) or 1000-2000 km (incoherent scatter radars, and stations for recording the rotation of the polarization plane of the VHF signal from geo stationary satellites), it has become possible, for the ﬁrst time, to carry out a global detection o f the Earth’s plasmaspheric disturbances in the height range as high as 20,000 km. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors are grateful to A. V. Mikhalev, E. A. Ponomarev and A. V. Tashilin for their encouraging interest in this study and active participations in discuss ions. Thanks are also due V. G. Mikhalkovsky for his assistance in preparing the Engli sh version of the T EX-manuscript. This work was done with support under RFBR grant of leading scient iﬁc schools of the Russian Federation No. 00-15-98509 and Russian Foundation for Basi c Research (grant 99-05-64753). REFERENCES [1] Hocke, K., and K. Schlegel, A review of atmospheric gravi ty waves and travelingionospheric disturbances: 1982–1995. Annales Geophysicae ,14, 917 (1996). [2] Hunsucker, R. D., Atmospheric gravity waves generated i n the high-latitude ionosphere. A review. Review of Geophysics ,20, 293 (1982). [3] Mitra, A. P., Ionospheric eﬀects of solar ﬂares, New Delh i -12, India, (1974).16:0016:3017:0017:3018:00080160nT 16:0016:3017:0017:3018:000501001502005 MEV 16:0016:3017:0017:3018:00160320H(t), rel. unitsGOES 10 16:0016:3017:0017:3018:00-0.8-0.40.0d I(t), TECUtmax=16:40 (16,67) 16:0016:3017:0017:3018:00-0.8-0.40d I(t), TECUGOES 10sca b c d eday-time n=511 night-time n=235Irkutsk Time, UT Fig/. /1 /: a/./) The v ariations in magnetic / ux at geostationary orbit of theGOES/1/0 station /(/1/3/5 /W /)/; b/./) The v ariations of /5 MeV proton / ux /; c/./) Thev ariations of the H/-comp onen t of the magnetic /eld H /( t /) for the time in terv al/1/6/:/0/0/{/1/8/:/0/0 UT/, April /6/, /2/0/0/0/, at station Irkutsk /(/5/2 /: /2 /N /, /1/0/4 /: /3 /E /)/; d/./) Theresult of a global spatial a v eraging of dI/(t/) for /5/1/1 LOS on the da yside/; e/./) Theresult of a global spatial a v eraging of dI/(t/) for /2/3/5 LOS on the nigh tside/.April 6 , 2000; 16:42 UT 060120180240300360 Longitude E, deg.-80-60-40-20020406080Latitude N, deg. 060120180240300360 Longitude E, deg.-80-4004080Latitude N, deg.a b17 19 21 23 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 LTFig/. /2 /: a/./) The geometry of the part of the global GPS net w ork /(dots cor/-resp ond to the lo cation of GPS stations/)/. The upp er scale indicates the lo caltime L T/, corresp onding to the time /1/6 UT/; b/./) The co ordinates of subionospher/-ic p oin ts sho ws for the heigh t of the F/2/-la y er maxim um hmax /= /3/0/0 km for allsatellites visible at the SC time for eac h of the GPS stations mark ed on panel a/(a total of /7/4/6 b eams/)/.-80-60-40-20020406080 Latitude, deg.16.616.81717.217.4t min, UT 04812162024 Time, LT16.616.81717.217.4t min, UT -80-60-40-20020406080 Latitude, deg.-2-1.5-1-0.50A,TECU 04812162024 Time, LT-2-1.5-1-0.50A,TECUApril 6, 2000 a b c dSC SCFig/. /3 /: a/./) The latitudinal dep endencies /(obtained for eac h LOS/) of the tmin /;b/./) The total distributions of tmin as a function of lo cal time L T /; c/./) Thelatitudinal dep endencies /(obtained for eac h LOS/) of the amplitude A /; d/./) Thetotal distributions A as a function of lo cal time L T/.
arXiv:physics/0007007v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 5 Jul 2000Under consideration for publication in J. Fluid Mech. 1 Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors and asymptotic spectrum By M. RIEUTORD1,2, B. GEORGEOT3ANDL. VALDETTARO1,4 1Observatoire Midi-Pyr´ en´ ees, 14 av. E. Belin, F-31400 Tou louse, France 2Institut Universitaire de France 3Laboratoire de Physique Quantique IRSAMC, Universit´ e Pau l Sabatier, 118, Route de Narbonne F-31062 Toulouse Cedex 4, France 4Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza L. da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy (Received 2 February 2008) We investigate the asymptotic properties of inertial modes conﬁned in a spherical shell when viscosity tends to zero. We ﬁrst consider the mapping ma de by the characteristics of the hyperbolic equation (Poincar´ e’s equation) satisﬁe d by inviscid solutions. Charac- teristics are straight lines in a meridional section of the s hell, and the mapping shows that, generically, these lines converge towards a periodic orbit which acts like an attrac- tor (the associated Lyapunov exponent is always negative or zero). We show that these attractors exist in bands of frequencies the size of which de creases with the number of reﬂection points of the attractor. At the bounding frequenc ies the associated Lyapunov exponent is generically either zero or minus inﬁnity. We fur ther show that for a given frequency the number of coexisting attractors is ﬁnite. We then examine the relation between this characteristic pa th and eigensolutions of the inviscid problem and show that in a purely two-dimension al problem, convergence towards an attractor means that the associated velocity ﬁel d is not square-integrable. We give arguments which generalize this result to three dimens ions. Then, using a sphere immersed in a ﬂuid ﬁlling the whole space, we study the critic al latitude singularity and show that the velocity ﬁeld diverges as 1 /√ d,dbeing the distance to the characteristic grazing the inner sphere. We then consider the viscous problem and show how viscosity t ransforms singularities into internal shear layers which in general betray an attrac tor expected at the eigenfre- quency of the mode. Investigating the structure of these she ar layers, we ﬁnd that they are nested layers, the thinnest and most internal layer scal ing withE1/3-scale,Ebeing the Ekman number; for this latter layer, we give its analytic al form and show its simi- larity to vertical1 3-shear layers of steady ﬂows. Using an inertial wave packet t raveling around an attractor, we give a lower bound on the thickness of shear layers and show how eigenfrequencies can be computed in principle. Finally , we show that as viscosity decreases, eigenfrequencies tend towards a set of values wh ich is not dense in [0 ,2Ω], contrary to the case of the full sphere (Ω is the angular veloc ity of the system). Hence, our geometrical approach opens the possibility of de scribing the eigenmodes and eigenvalues for astrophysical/geophysical Ekman numb ers (10−10−10−20), which are out of reach numerically, and this for a wide class of cont ainers.2 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro 1. Introduction Inertial waves, which propagate in rotating ﬂuids thanks to the restoring action of the Coriolis force, can generate very singular ﬂuid ﬂows when th ey are conﬁned in a closed container. These very special properties of inertial modes were ﬁrst noticed in the theo- retical work of K. Stewartson and others (Stewartson & Ricka rd 1969; Stewartson 1971, 1972a,b; Walton 1975; London & Shen 1979). They appeared aga in recently in numerical investigations by Hollerbach & Kerswell (1995), Rieutord ( 1995), Rieutord & Valdettaro (1997), Fotheringham & Hollerbach (1998) and show an even gr eater generality since they are also present in stratiﬁed ﬂuids (Maas & Lam 1995; Rie utord & Noui 1999) or rotating stratiﬁed ﬂuids (Dintrans et al. 1999). The particularity of all these waves (inertial, gravity, gr avito-inertial) is that their associated modes are solutions of an ill-posed boundary-va lue problem when they are conﬁned in a close container: the partial diﬀerential equat ion is of hyperbolic or mixed type in the spatial variables. This yields all kinds of singu larities. When viscosity is included, these singularities are regularized but they sti ll play a central role in featuring the shape of inertial modes of a rotating spherical shell; in particular, they control the asymptotic limit of small diﬀusivities which is the relevan t limit for astrophysical or geophysical applications. The aim of this paper is to present what we believe to be the asy mptotic limit of inertial modes in a spherical shell when viscosity tends to z ero. In the ﬁrst part of the paper we shall present the main features of the solutions of t his problem when viscosity is omitted. For this purpose we examine the trajectories of c haracteristics in a meridional plane of the shell as if they were trajectories of a dynamical system in some conﬁguration space. We then focus on the relation between these trajector ies and the eigenfunctions in two and three dimensions. We end this part with a close look at the critical latitude singularity. In the second part we investigate the changes b rought on by viscosity and we examine more closely the structure of shear layers which a rise. Then, by studying the behaviour of a wave-packet, we show how eigenvalues and eige nmodes may be computed in the asymptotic limit of a small viscosity. We conclude thi s part by a brief discussion of the distribution of eigenvalues in the complex plane. The pa per ends with a discussion of the more general cases including containers with a diﬀerent shape and of the applications of the present theoretical results. As this paper is rather long and goes through some mathematic al developments which may be skipped at ﬁrst reading, we suggest the casual reader t o skip subsections §2.2.1- 5, 2.3.1-2 and 2.4.1-2 and be lead by the introductions of sec tions 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 and then jump to 2.5 and 2.6. The second part is not so mathematica l but the details of the boundary layer analysis ( §3.2.2-4) can be skipped at ﬁrst reading. 2. Some properties of inviscid solutions 2.1.Equations of motion We consider a ﬂuid with no viscosity contained in a spherical shell whose outer radius is R and inner radius ηRwithη<1. The ﬂuid is rotating around the z-axis with the angular velocity Ω. Using (2Ω)−1as the time scale and Ras the length scale, small amplitude perturbations obey the linear equation ∂/vector u ∂t+/vector ez×/vector u=−/vector∇p /vector∇ ·/vector u= 0  (2.1)Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 3 where/vector uis the velocity ﬁeld of the perturbations and pis the reduced pressure perturba- tion. The boundary conditions are simply /vector u·/vector er= 0 at r=ηandr= 1 (2.2) As in Rieutord & Valdettaro (1997) and Dintrans, Rieutord & V aldettaro (1999) we shall use spherical coordinates ( r,θ,ϕ) or cylindrical coordinates ( s,ϕ,z )./vector eqwill denote the unit vector associated with the coordinate q∈ {r,θ,ϕ,s,z }. When the time dependence of the solutions is assumed proport ional to exp( iωt), equa- tions (2.1) may be cast into a single equation for the pressur e, namely ∇2p−1 ω2∂2p ∂z2= 0 (2.3) which has been referred to as Poincar´ e equation since the wo rk of Cartan (1922). This equation is completed by the boundary condition /vector u·/vector er= 0 which reads −ω2/vector er·/vector∇p+iω(/vector ez×/vector er)·/vector∇p+ (/vector ez·/vector er)(/vector ez·/vector∇p) = 0 (2.4) when expressed with the pressure; it applies at r=ηandr= 1. As is well-known (Greenspan 1969), the Poincar´ e equation i s hyperbolic since for all modesω<1. Therefore, a ﬁrst step in the analysis of this equation is t he determination of the characteristics surfaces; for this purpose, we note t hat second-order derivatives of this equation read ∂2p ∂x2+∂2p ∂y2−α2 ω2∂2p ∂z2 whereα2= 1−ω2.xandyare the cartesian coordinates in a plane z= 0. These second-order derivatives deﬁne characteristics surfaces such asz−f(x,y) = 0 where f veriﬁes : /parenleftbigg∂f ∂x/parenrightbigg2 +/parenleftbigg∂f ∂y/parenrightbigg2 =α2 ω2. (2.5) These surfaces are known as ‘surfaces of constant slope’ as a ny tangent plane makes the same angle ϑ=π 2−arcsinωwith the equatorial plane z= 0. In fact, these surfaces may be generated by a family of such planes or by cones which apert ure angle is λ= arcsinω (2.6) which is also the critical latitude in a sphere. In a meridion al plane, the trace of these surfaces are simply straight lines making the angle λwith the rotation axis. A second step in the analysis of the Poincar´ e equation is to e xamine the separability of the variables. Because of the symmetry of the problem with re spect to rotations around thez-axis, theϕvariable may always be separated from the two others. This im plies that solutions may always be expressed as /summationdisplay mpm(r,θ)eimϕ and that each Fourier component pm(r,θ) is independent of the others. The two other coordinates, however, are not separable in the general case. This point may be understood easily if we recall that through a linear tr ansformation of the z- coordinate, the Poincar´ e equation may be transformed into the Laplace equation as ﬁrst4 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro π/2+λ π/2−λ1 2(a) 3 4 −π/2+λ −π/2−λφn+1φnδm φmm+1φ(b)π−λ λ −λ π+λ2,3 1,23,42,31,41,23,4 1,4β Figure 1. (a) The four directions of propagation and the correspondin g four values of δn’s. (b) A sketch of the notations used to describe the mapping. The nu mbers (1,4), (2,3) etc. indicate the possible directions of propagation of characteristics as shown in the panel (a). shown by Bryan (1889) (see also Greenspan 1969). In this tran sformation the boundaries transform into one-sheet hyperboloids. One therefore adop ts an ellipsoidal coordinate system within which one of the boundaries is a surface of coor dinate; unfortunately, since the two bounding hyperboloids are not confocal, coord inates can be only separated on one of the boundaries of the spherical shell. Hence, one ma y simplify, and actually solve, the problem either in the full sphere (see Greenspan 1 969) or in the inﬁnite ﬂuid outside a sphere (see below). We have now seen the basic ingredients which make this proble m diﬃcult: hyperbolicity (ill-posedness) and non-separability. 2.2.Orbits of characteristics As shown by the foregoing discussion the diﬃculty of the prob lem lies in the behaviour of the solutions with respect to the coordinates in a meridio nal plane (s,z) or (r,θ). We shall therefore restrict our analysis to this plane where ch aracteristic surfaces are simply straight lines; thanks to the exp( imϕ)-dependence, our results will apply equally to ax- isymmetric or non-axisymmetric modes. Indeed, using the se paration of the ϕ-variable, we eliminate second-order derivatives in ϕand characteristic surfaces are just cones in- dependent of m. We shall therefore study, in the following subsections, th e trajectories of characteristics in a meridional plane as we did in Dintran set al. (1999). Since this is a rather technical matter, the reader may ﬁrst skip it and dir ectly jump to section 2.3 where the results are summarized. 2.2.1. The mapping From (2.5) we derive the well-known equations of the two fami lies of characteristics: ωz±αs=u∓ (2.7) whereu±will designate the characteristics coordinates. u+andu−are constant along characteristics of positive and negative slopes, respecti vely. To describe the paths followed by characteristics, we ﬁrst s tudy the map which relatesInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 φn/4π00.20.40.60.81φn+1/4π Figure 2. The resulting mapping in the case of a shell with η= 0.35 when the frequency isω= 0.40782. Twelve points of discontinuity indicate the project ion of the ‘shadow’ and the critical latitude of the inner sphere on the outer one (see te xt); the four apparent discontinuities due to the periodicity in the [0,4 π] interval are not counted. the position of the n+1threﬂection point to the one of the nthboth taken on the outer sphere. For this purpose we mark out these points by an angle φ∈[0,2π] which is identical to the latitude when 0 ≤φ≤π/2; this is indeed more convenient than the colatitude. If one reﬂection is needed on the inner sphere th en we have sin(φn−δn) =ηsin(β−δn) sin(φn+1−δn+1) =ηsin(β−δn+1)/bracerightbigg (2.8) whereβis the position of the reﬂection point on the inner shell and δn=±π/2±λis the direction of the characteristic which can take four valu es as illustrated in ﬁgure 1a. If the two reﬂection points are simply connected by one segme nt of characteristics then the recurrence relation is either φm+φm+1=−2λ[2π] (2.9) when the characteristic has a positive slope, or φm+φm+1= 2λ[2π] (2.10) when the characteristic has a negative slope. These notatio ns are summarized in ﬁgure 1b. From the expression (2.8), (2.9) and (2.10) one can compute t he map φn+1=/braceleftbigg f+(φn) f−(φn) Such a map is bi-valued since one may compute the image by ﬁrst applying a positive- (f+) or a negative- ( f−) slope characteristic. However, such a representation is n ot con- venient for iterating the map since for each iteration one ha s to decide whether to use f+orf−. We therefore constructed a single-valued map which is deﬁn ed in the following way: Considering a point of the outer sphere, we mark it out by the angleφ∈[0,2π] if it is to be iterated by f−or by the same angle plus 2 πif it is to be iterated by f+. We thus deﬁne the map:6 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 φn/4π00.20.40.60.81φn+3/4π 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 φn/4π00.20.40.60.81φn+8/4π Figure 3. The third (left panel) and eighth (right panel) iterate of th e map in the case of a mode with ω= 0.40782 for a shell of aspect ratio η= 0.35: note the appearance of ﬁxed points marked out by the intersection of the curve with the line φn+p=φn. They indicate the existence of attractive periodic orbits of period 3 and 8 respectively . Note also the increased number of discontinuities of the mapping. f: [0,4π]− →[0,4π] φn− →f(φn) =φn+1 (2.11) which is one-to-one except at some points of discontinuity a nd which can be easily iter- ated. An example of this map is given in ﬁgure 2. One of the remarkable features of this map is that it is not con tinuous. The disconti- nuities occur at the colatitudes (in the ﬁrst quadrant) θ±=λ±arcsinη, θ s=λ+ arcsin(ηcos2λ) θ±are delineating the ‘shadow’ projection of the inner shell o n the outer shell (see ﬁgure 5 for an illustration of the shadow). They illustrate t he case when a characteristic is tangent to the inner sphere at critical latitude. θsis the colatitude of the projection of the inner sphere’s critical latitude on the outer sphere. These angles ( θ±) delimit the intervals where the map is contracting \|f′\|<1 or dilating \|f′\|>1 or neutral \|f′\|= 1. When the map (2.11) is iterated as in ﬁgure 3 and since, generi cally, discontinuities are not mapped onto themselves †, their number increases proportionally to the number of iterations; also some ﬁxed points appear which indicate t he existence of attractors, i.e. attractive periodic orbits which we discuss below ( §2.2.4). We would therefore expect that the basins of attraction of the inﬁnitely iterated map, cont aining an inﬁnite number of intervals at smaller and smaller scales, would have a fracta l structure; however, numerical studies show only isolated accumulation points which are ac tually the ﬁxed repulsive points of the mapping, i.e.the repellors (see ﬁgure 4). We therefore see that the structure of basins of attraction i s much more complicated than in the case studied by Maas & Lam (1995) and may represent the general case for such systems. †The case when all discontinuities are mapped onto themselve s corresponds to periodic orbits of the shadow (see §2.2.3).Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 7 0.6668 0.6669 0.667 φn/4π0.20.40.60.81φn+N/4π φRpolar 10−1110−1010−910−810−710−610−510−4 (φn−φR)/4π0.20.40.60.81φn+N/4π polar Figure 4. Zoom of the Nthiterate ( N= 1200) of the map near an accumulation point. The aspect ratio ηand the frequency ωare the same as in ﬁgure 3. On the left panel we clearly see the presence of the accumulation point φR; the two arrows indicate the basins of attraction of the polar attractor in ﬁgure 7a; the other segments belong to the basin of the other (equatorial) attractor. On the right panel we see that the width of the inte rvals of the basins of attraction vanishes geometrically as the accumulation point is approa ched. 2.2.2. Orbits and Lyapunov exponents: the full sphere case Once the mapping is known, we may examine the trajectories of characteristics. For the sake of clarity, it is useful to ﬁrst consider the case of t he full sphere for which only (2.9) and (2.10) are necessary. We ﬁrst note that the number of reﬂection points of a periodic orbit is necessarily even,i.e.2q, when the starting point is not a critical latitude. Applyin g alternatively (2.9) and (2.10), we have φ1=−φ2+ 2λ[2π] −φ2=φ3+ 2λ[2π] ......... φ2q−1=−φ2q+ 2λ[2π] −φ2q=φ1+ 2λ[2π]  (2.12) Summing all these equations leads to the conclusion that a pe riodic orbit is such that λ=pπ 2q(2.13) wherepand 2qare integers which represent the number of crossings of the o rbit with respectively the axis of rotation or the equator. From the preceding results, it turns out that all orbits such thatλ=rπwithrirra- tional, are ergodic (quasi-periodic). At this point it is wo rth noting that eigenfrequencies of inertial modes in the full sphere are in general associate d with quasi-periodic orbits. We prove in appendix A that, for instance, the ﬁrst axisymmetri c inertial mode of frequency/radicalbig 3/7 is associated with a quasi-periodic orbit. To conclude with the full sphere, we just need to point out tha t thanks to relations (2.9) or (2.10), it is clear that the Lyapunov exponent is alw ays zero. Indeed, if we recall the deﬁnition of the Lyapunov exponent Λ associated with an o rbit: Λ = lim N→∞1 NN/summationdisplay n=1ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingledφn+1 dφn/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle,8 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro Figure 5. The shadow pattern for a spherical shell with η= 0.2 when λ=π/6 (ω= 0.5). it is clear that for the full sphere/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingledφn+1 dφn/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle= 1∀n, so Λ = 0. 2.2.3. Orbits and Lyapunov exponents: the shell case We now turn to the shell case. As we already observed the map ha s discontinuities deﬁned by the shadow of the inner sphere on the outer shell and the projection of critical latitudes. If the inner sphere is suﬃciently small, the shad ow may draw a periodic pattern if the critical latitude λis commensurable with π. A simple case is illustrated in ﬁgure 5. For these frequencies, orbits starting in the shadow remain in the shadow while those starting outside remain outside. In this way, one can constr uct the set of all periodic orbits with Λ = 0 i.e.all neutral periodic orbits. The fact that periodic orbits outside the shadow are neutral is obvious; the case of orbits in the shadow is less obvious but we may consider the fa ct that if these orbits were not neutral, the shadow would not map onto itself. As a sh ort exercise, we may follow one such orbit for ω= sin(π/2(2p+ 1)). The shadow should cross only twice the location of the inner sphere. It bounces ﬁrst on the inner sph ere, at an angle β1, and then on the outer sphere at the angle φ1given by sin( φ1−δ) =ηsin(β1−δ) (δis one of the angles δnin ﬁgure 1). Then it bounces 2 ptimes on the outer sphere. After each two reﬂections, the angle φchanges into φ+ 4δ. Therefore after 2 pbounces, the angle on the outer sphere is φ1+ 4pδ. It bounces then again on the inner sphere, hitting it at the angleβ2such that sin( φ1+δ+ 4pδ) =ηsin(β2+δ). But 2(2p+ 1)δ=πtherefore δ+4pδ=π−δ[2π]. So sin(φ1−δ) =−ηsin(β2+δ) =ηsin(β1−δ). Therefore β1=−β2[2π] orβ1=π+β2+ 2δ[2π]. Repeating this entire process 2(2 p+ 1) times, one comes back to the original β1. In fact periodic orbits of the shadow do not exist for all λ’s commensurable with π. Indeed the image of the shadow must not be split by discontinu ities; this implies that porqcannot be too large or the shell too thin. More precisely, for a givenη, periodic orbits of the shadow exist if: arcsinη≤λ≤arccosη (2.14) Ifη≥1/√ 2, only one neutral periodic orbit exists: it is such that λ=π/4 orω= 1/√ 2.Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 9 Figure 6. The lyapunov exponent of one basin as a function of frequency (left) or critical latitude (right). Note the symmetry of this last plot with re spect to π/4. The vertical dotted lines mark the critical latitudes π/6,π/4 and π/3; the aspect ratio of the shell is η= 0.35. More generally, for a given aspect ratio η, one may determine all the frequencies associ- ated with neutral periodic orbits and their number increase s as the size of the inner shell decreases. These frequencies are obviously determined by ( 2.13) but due to the ﬁnite size of the shadow, one needs to eliminate large values of pandq. If we remark that the most robust periodic orbits (when ηincreases) are those with p= 1 (restricting ourselves to λ≤π/4), relation (2.14) easily bounds the permitted values of q. For a shell like the core of the Earth, where η= 0.35, onlyq= 2,3,4 are possible. The frequencies of neutral periodic orbits are important as they shape the form of the Lyapunov exponent curve since, then, intervals contractin g throughf+are exactly dilated byf−which makes the Lyapunov exponent vanish. As a consequence, frequencies in the neighbourhood of one such frequency are associated with ver y long orbits having a small Lyapunov exponent. This is the reason why ‘windows’ appear n ear these frequencies, especially near ω= 1/√ 2 (λ=π/4) as clearly shown in ﬁgure 6. This latter ﬁgure shows many spikes which in fact betray the p resence of other periodic orbits which we shall call attractors after Maas & Lam (1995). For such orbits Λ ≤0. In fact for this system, all the orbits (except may be some iso lated ones) verify this inequality and no chaos is possible: the conﬁguration space being one-dimensional and the mapping being one-to-one. 2.2.4. Some properties of attractors in the shell In order to make the dynamics of attractors clearer, it is use ful to concentrate on a speciﬁc example which can be computed explicitly. For this p urpose, we choose a spherical shell similar to that of the core of the Earth for which η= 0.35 and we focus on the orbit with four reﬂections on the outer or inner shell as show n in ﬁgure 7. If the shell is thinner, this orbit is localized in the vicinity of the equat or which is the kind studied by Stewartson (1971, 1972a,b). The Lyapunov exponent of this orbit may be computed explicit ly in the following way: Let us ﬁrst recall that plane inertial waves reﬂecting on a su rface oriented by /vector nveriﬁes the relation10 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro Figure 7. (a) Two attractors coexisting when ω= 0.4051; we call them ‘polar’ and ‘equatorial’ respectively as they are characterized by the fact that the r eﬂection on the inner sphere occurs above or below the critical latitude; the arrows indicate th e direction of focusing. (b) Lyapunov exponent as a function of frequency in the vicinity of ω= 0.4051; the thick solid line denotes the equatorial attractor while the thick dashed line represent s the polar attractor; these two thick lines have been derived from the analytic formulae (B4) and ( B8) given in appendix B. /vectorki×/vector n=/vectorkr×/vector n where/vectorkiand/vectorkrare the wave vectors of the incident and reﬂected waves respe ctively (Greenspan 1969). When applied to a reﬂection on a sphere, th is relation implies kr=kisin(φ±λ) sin(φ∓λ) whereφis the ‘latitude’ of the reﬂection point. From this relation , we can compute the rate of contraction of an inﬁnitesimal interval in the neigh bourhood of a reﬂection point of the orbit. Therefore, the Lyapunov exponent of an attract or withNreﬂection points is simply given by: Λ =−1 NlnN/productdisplay k=1sin(φk±λ) sin(φk∓λ)(2.15) where theφk’s describe the reﬂection points of the attractor (a periodi c orbit). At this point we shall deﬁne two useful quantities characterizing a ttractors, namely their length and their period . We shall call the number of reﬂection points (on both sphere s) the length of the attractor while its period will refer to the min imum number of iteration of the mapping needed to generate its associated ﬁxed points; b ecause of the deﬁnition of the mapping, the period is also the number of reﬂection point s on the outer sphere. For instance, the period of the equatorial attractor of ﬁgure 7a is ’3’ and its length is ’4’, while for the polar one, the length is ’10’ and the period ’8’ ( we do not allow reﬂections on the axis). We give in appendix B the explicit calculations relevant to the orbits of ﬁgure 7. The curves Λ( ω) (ﬁgure 7b) show the same feature: in the interval of existen ce of theInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 11 orbit, Λ varies between 0 and −∞. The two extremes correspond respectively to the cases when the reﬂection on the inner shell occurs at the equator or at its critical latitude. We note that the vanishing value of the Lyapunov exponent does n ot mean that for this frequency the orbit is no longer an attractor: it simply mean s that convergence towards the attractor is no longer exponential; in most cases, it doe s converge, but algebraically. For later use, we also computed the behaviour of Λ( ω) in the vicinity of the point ω0 such that Λ( ω0) = 0. We ﬁnd in the particular case of the equatorial attracto r that Λ(ω) =−K(ω−ω0)1/2,withK= 4.8184, ω 0= 0.403112887 (2.16) In fact this behaviour is general as is shown in appendix B. Le t us also emphasize that when Λ = 0, the orbit is just one broken line connecting: •the equator or the pole of the spheres to another equator or po le, •the equator or the pole of the spheres to the critical latitud es of the outer sphere. With the terminology in use for dynamical systems, such an or bit restricted to the ﬁrst quadrant is self-retracing: a mass-point would go back and f orth on the same trajectory. The foregoing results make the shape of ﬁgure 6 quite clear no w. Most of the ‘spikes’ shown in this graph will therefore tend to −∞as the number of points of the graph is increased. But to be complete, we need also mention some case s when a segment of an orbit intercepts the inner shell after being tangential to i t. In this case the curve Λ( ω) has a discontinuity and does not reach −∞. We therefore see that attractors are featuring ﬁgure 6. As it will be clear later they also feature the shape of the asymptotic spectrum. It is thus interesting to know some elementary properties of these geometrical objects. From a rather large number of computations we observed, as Ma as & Lam (1995), that, in the ﬁrst quadrant, not more than two attractors may coexis t for a single frequency. However, these two attractors can be used to construct other attractors which are just their image symmetrized with respect to axis of rotation and equator. Considering the propagation of characteristics in the full meridional sect ion of the shell, we observe that these lines can converge towards six attractors at most. Usi ng the properties of the mapping (2.11), we have been able to prove under certain hypo theses (see appendix C), that the number of attractors is bounded by the number of poin ts of discontinuity (which is twelve). We also computed the interval of existence, in frequency spa ce, of a large number of attractors so as to show its relation with the length of the attractor. As shown in ﬁgure 8, the interval of existence is well correlated with th e inverse square of the length. We explain this law in the following way: for a very long attra ctor of length N≫1 the number of reﬂections on the inner and outer shell scales w ithN, therefore the mean angular distance between the critical latitude and the near est reﬂection point is O(1/N). This implies that just a O(1/N2) variation in frequency is necessary to shift this point to the critical latitude. The latter result has an interesting consequence on the shap e of the curve Λ( ω) for a given long attractor. Indeed, from (2.15) the divergence to ward−∞of an attractor of lengthNis of the form: Λ∼1 Nln [N(ω−ωc)] whereωcis the frequency of the singularity of Λ; we used the fact that (2.15) is dominated by one term ( φk−λ∼0 withφk−λ∼N(ω−ωc) ); since the interval of existence of the attractor scales like 1 /N2, if we choose a point such that ω−ωc=α/N2the Lyapunov12 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro 10 100 1000 N10−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1δλ Figure 8. Interval of existence in latitude of several diﬀerent attractors, plotted as a function of their length NThe straight solid line is the inverse square of the length.10 100 1000 N10−810−710−610−510−410−310−210−1distance Figure 9. Distance to the point on the ex- ternal sphere at critical latitude, for several diﬀerent attractors, plotted as a function of the length N. The straight solid line is the inverse square of the length. The dashed line gives the lower bound (in distance) for physically relevant attractors (see discus- sion in §3.1). exponent will scale like Λ ∼ −ln(αN) Nwhich vanishes at large N. This means that the singularity of the Lypaunov curve occupies a smaller and sma ller fraction of the interval of existence of the attractor. Hence for long attractors, th e Lyapunov exponent is very small in a larger and larger part of their interval of existen ce. This explains why long attractors appear numerically as weakly attracting eventh ough their Lyapunov exponent may diverge. In ﬁgure 9 we show the distance of attractors to the point on th e external sphere at critical latitude as a function of the length. Since a period ic orbit exists in a range of frequencies (see ﬁgure 8), instead of showing a single point we represent a vertical segment connecting the minimum and maximum distance over the entire range of existence of the attractor in frequency space. We see that the maximum distan ce is well correlated with the inverse square of the length. This distance is important in the ﬁnal appearance of the attractor when viscosity is included. As it will be shown lat er on an example, the build- up of energy along an attractor can be impeded by the boundari es; this eﬀect therefore puts an upper bound on the viscosity for the attractor to be vi sible. The dashed line in the ﬁgure gives the lower bound (in distance) for physical ly relevant attractors (see discussion and the example in §3.1). 2.2.5. Diﬀerences with billiards It is interesting to compare the mapping deﬁned by (2.8-2.10 ) with the billiard problem studied in classical chaos, where a particle bounces specul arly on the walls of a cavity. Billiard phase spaces are two-dimensional (position and ve locity direction) while the phase space of our problem is one-dimensional (in projectio n), since the only variable is the position along the circles representing inner and out er shells. The problem is not Hamiltonian, there is no conservation of the symplectic mea sure in phase space, and attractors and repellors exist. For the full sphere, η= 0, we have seen that all the orbits are neutral (Λ = 0) and are either quasiperiodic (and ergodic) or periodic (when λis a rational fraction of π). Whenηis made nonzero, all quasiperiodic orbits are instantaneou sly destroyed, and the periodic orbits remain neutral until they are eventually de stroyed when ηincreases, theInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 13 rational values with smaller denominator surviving last. I t is interesting to note that this situation is exactly the opposite of the Kolmogorov-Ar nold-Moser (KAM) theorem valid for Hamiltonian systems close to integrability (see A rnold 1989). In this latter case, it is well-known that for an integrable Hamiltonian sy stem all orbits lie on tori, and orbits are organized in families, either quasiperiodic (an d ergodic) or periodic, for a given torus. If one perturbs such an integrable Hamiltonian syste m by a suﬃciently smooth perturbation, the KAM theorem states ﬁrst that all rational tori (with periodic orbits) are instantaneously destroyed, and second that irrational tori (with quasiperiodic orbits) disappear one after the other when the perturbation is incre ased, the last to disappear being the ‘furthest’ to the rationals. 2.3.Relations between orbits of characteristics and eigenfunc tions In the preceding subsections we have shown that, genericall y, characteristics converge to- wards attractors which are formed by a periodic orbit. These attractors live in a frequency band whose size decreases with the length (or period) of the a ttractor. The attracting power is measured by a negative Lyapunov exponent which gene rically varies between 0 and −∞when the frequency band is scanned. Several (less than 6) att ractors may coexist for a given frequency; in this case they own each a bas in of attraction (described for instance as a set of points on the outer boundary) whose st ructure is governed by accumulation points (see ﬁg. 4). We have also found periodic orbits which are notattractors; their frequency can be writtenω= sin(pπ/2q) where (p,q) are chosen in a ﬁnite set of integers. The number of these orbits is therefore ﬁnite but increases as the radius o f the inner core decreases. The frequencies of these orbits will prove to be useful since in t heir neighbourhood, attractors have very great length and, therefore, very small (in absolu te value) Lyapunov exponents. This will inﬂuence the shape of the asymptotic spectrum ( i.e.with low viscosities). Now we shall see how the eigenfunctions are inﬂuenced by the p resence of an attractor. 2.3.1. The two-dimensional case Because of the simple form of the Poincar´ e equation in two di mensions, which may be written as ∂2P ∂u+∂u−= 0 (2.17) early investigations have focused on this case in particula r those of mathematicians. The relevant contributions are those of Bourgin & Duﬃn (1939 ), John (1941), Høiland (1962), Franklin (1972), Ralston (1973) and Schaeﬀer (1975 ). Much of this previous work is concentrated in a theorem demonstrated in Schaeﬀer (1975 ) which states that: There are non-trivial solutions of (2.17) if and only if ther e exists an integer n such that all reﬂected rays close after precisely 2n reﬂections. If there is one solution, then there are inﬁnitely many, linearly independent solutions. In other words, eigenvalues of regular modes are always asso ciated with periodic orbits and these eigenvalues are always inﬁnitely degenerate. Sin ce the reﬂected rays must close, starting from any point of the curve, the Lyapunov exponent o f such periodic orbits is always zero. Note the diﬀerence with the three-dimensional case where eigenmodes in the full sphere are associated with ergodic (quasi-periodic) o rbits (cf §2.2.2 and appendix A) and eigenvalues are non-degenerate. Another interesting result was derived from mathematical a nalysis by Ralston (1973). Namely, it states that the velocity ﬁeld associated with a so lution of (2.17) is not square- integrable when characteristics are focused towards a wedg e formed by the boundaries.14 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro An example of such a singular ﬂow is given in Wunsch (1968) wit h the case of internal waves focused by a sloping boundary. In the interval of frequ encies where the velocity ﬁeld is not square-integrable, eigenvalues do not exist and the point spectrum of Poincar´ e operator is said to be empty. The foregoing results may be generalized to our case, or the o ne studied by Maas & Lam (1995), where characteristics are focused towards an attra ctor. Indeed, let us consider the total kinetic energy of a ‘mode’ associated with an attra ctor; using characteristic coordinates, this quantity reads I=/integraldisplay S∝ba∇dbl/vector v∝ba∇dbl2du+du−+/integraldisplay CS∝ba∇dbl/vector v∝ba∇dbl2du+du− whereSdesignates a neighbourhood of the attractor and CSthe remaining ‘volume’; we assume that the limits of Sare made up of characteristics. If the attractor is of length Nthen this integral can be split into Npieces I=N/summationdisplay n=1/integraldisplay Sn∝ba∇dbl/vector v∝ba∇dbl2du+du− where we neglected the contribution from CS. Now each of these pieces can be split again into an inﬁnite number of rectangles Rkwith sides made up of characteristics. Hence we write /integraldisplay Sn∝ba∇dbl/vector v∝ba∇dbl2du+du−=∞/summationdisplay k=1/integraldisplay Rk∝ba∇dbl/vector v∝ba∇dbl2du+du−=∞/summationdisplay k=1Ik In the vicinity of the attractor, these rectangles are very e longated: one side remains O(1) long while the other shrinks to zero as the attractor is ap proached. Now we take the two long sides as images through the mapping ma de by the charac- teristics. The mapping has a contracting rate given by eΛ<1 where Λ is its Lyapunov exponent. Maas & Lam (1995) have shown how one can construct t he stream function in the whole domain by iterating an arbitrary function given on its boundary. When the attractor is approached, the scale of the stream functio n vanishes while its ampli- tude remains constant; therefore the kinetic energy is ampl iﬁed by a factor e−2Λat each iteration of the mapping. Noting that one rectangle is small er by a factor eΛthan its predecessor, we can derive the iteration rule Ik+1=e−ΛIk which shows that the integral Iis inﬁnite. We may note in passing that if dkis the distance of the kthcharacteristic to the limit cycle, then dk=d0ekΛwhile the amplitude of the velocity ﬁeld is vk=v0e−kΛ. This shows that the velocity ﬁeld diverges as the inverse of the distance to the attractor. Therefore, as in the case of a wedge, the velocity ﬁeld is not s quare-integrable when characteristics converge towards an attractor. 2.3.2. The three-dimensional case The 3-D case has not beneﬁtted from the same interest by mathe maticians. In this case the Poincar´ e equation contains ﬁrst or zeroth order deriva tives which cannot be elimi- nated. Let us rewrite it using cylindrical coordinates and a ssume a exp( imϕ) dependence of the pressure; thus ∂2P ∂s2+1 s∂P ∂s−α2 ω2∂2P ∂z2−m2P s2= 0Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 15 S PQ M• sz Figure 10. A sketch for the illustration of Riemann’s method; the lines (SP) and (SQ) are segments of characteristics. The canonical form of this equation is obtained using charac teristics coordinates: 2∂2P ∂u+∂u−−1 u+−u−/parenleftbigg∂P ∂u+−∂P ∂u−/parenrightbigg −m2 (u+−u−)2P= 0 (2.18) which is known as the Euler-Darboux equation (Dautray & Lion s 1984-1985). A general solution of Euler-Darboux equation may be obtaine d with Riemann’s method (Colombo 1976; Zwillinger 1992). With this method one may ex press the value of the solution at one point when ‘initial’ data are given on an arc j oining two points on charac- teristics ‘emitted’ from the point considered (see ﬁgure 10 ). However, one needs to know the Riemann function (which plays an equivalent role to the G reen’s function of elliptic problems). To determine this function it is useful to rewrit e the pressure ﬂuctuation as P= Π/√s; doing so, the ﬁrst derivatives of Poincar´ e equation are el iminated but are replaced by the term Π /4s2. The equation for Π is therefore: ∂2Π ∂u+∂u−+/parenleftbigg m2−1 4/parenrightbiggΠ (u+−u−)2= 0 (2.19) The Riemann function is a solution of this equation †which meets the additional con- ditions: R(u+,u−) = 1,∂R ∂u+/parenrightbigg u−=∂R ∂u−/parenrightbigg u+= 0 (2.20) or, equivalently, R(u′ +,u−) =R(u+,u′ −) = 1 ∀(u′ +,u′ −)∈ D †In fact, it is a solution of the corresponding adjoint operat or which is identical to the original in this case.16 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro We shall call S(u+,u−) the point where the solution is computed and M(u′ +,u′ −) a point running on the arc of data; Dis the area deﬁned by (SPQ). As Friedlander & Heins (1968) have noted, (2.19) is invarian t for all the transformations leaving z=(u′ +−u+)(u′ −−u−) (u′ +−u′ −)(u+−u−) invariant. Therefore, seeking a solution of the form R(z), one ﬁnds that this function veriﬁes the diﬀerential equation: z(1−z)R′′−(2z−1)R′+µ(µ−1)R= 0 where we set µ=m+ 1/2. This is a special case of the diﬀerential equation of Gauss hypergeometric function, i.e.F(µ,1−µ; 1;z); in fact, it is just the equation satisﬁed by Legendre functions of index µ−1. Sincez≡z(S,M), we shall write Riemann’s function as R(S;M). Hence the formal solution of the problem is Π(S) =1 2(Π(P) + Π(Q)) +1 2/integraldisplay PQR(S;M)/parenleftbigg∂Π ∂u+du+−∂Π ∂u−du−/parenrightbigg + Π(M)/parenleftbigg∂R ∂u+du+−∂R ∂u−du−/parenrightbigg (2.21) which shows how the value of Π at Smay be constructed from the data given on the arc PQ. A simpler formula can be obtained for axisymmetric modes whe n the meridional stream functionψis considered †. After a similar transformation, where we set ψ=√sΨ, we ﬁnd that the associated Riemann function is also a Legendre f unction with µ=−1/2. If the arcPQis taken on the boundary then Ψ = 0 and the expression (2.21) si mpliﬁes into Ψ(S) =1 2/integraldisplay PQR(S;M)/parenleftbigg∂Ψ ∂u+du+−∂Ψ ∂u−du−/parenrightbigg (2.22) Let us now suppose that Sis also on the boundary (on the inner sphere for instance); then Ψ(S) = 0. If we introduce dC(Ψ) =/parenleftBig ∂Ψ ∂u+du+−∂Ψ ∂u−du−/parenrightBig , then we have /integraldisplay PQR(S;M)dC(Ψ) = 0 This relation holds also for neighbouring points ( P′Q′S′) of (PQS), thus /integraldisplay P′Q′R(S′;M)dC(Ψ) = 0 By subtracting these two equations we get /integraldisplay PP′R(S;M)dC(Ψ) +/integraldisplay QQ′R(S;M)dC(Ψ) +dφS/integraldisplay PQ∂R ∂φ(S;M)dC(Ψ) = 0 (2.23) †This function is such that us=1 s∂ψ ∂z, uz=−1 s∂ψ ∂sInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 17 wheredφSdenotes the variation of the position of S. SinceP′andQ′are in a neigh- bourhood of PandQrespectively and that R(S;P) =R(S;Q) = 1, the ﬁrst integrals of (2.23) can be simpliﬁed so that: C(Ψ)(P) +C(Ψ)(Q) +dφS dφ/integraldisplay PQ∂R ∂φ(S;M)dC(Ψ) = 0 (2.24) where C(Ψ) =∂Ψ ∂u+∂u+ ∂φ−∂Ψ ∂u−∂u− ∂φ. Now we consider that PSQ are part of a limit cycle like the one of ﬁgure 7a (right); let us callTthe fourth point of this cycle and let Pn,Sn,Qn,Tnbe the suite of points converging towards PSQT (i.e.those points at ( φ3,φ4,φ1,φ2) respectively). (2.24) can be applied to the triangles Pn,Sn,QnandQn,Tn,Pn+1and we get: C(Ψ)(Pn) =C(Ψ)(Pn+1)+dφT dφ/integraldisplay QnPn+1∂R ∂φ(Tn,M)dC(Ψ)+dφS dφ/integraldisplay QnPn∂R ∂φ(Sn,M)dC(Ψ) The two integrals in the RHS are of order unity and we surmise t hat they do not cancel. Therefore the suite of C(Ψ)(Pn) is diverging which means that the velocity ﬁelds tends to inﬁnity when a limit cycle is approached. This result can be generalized to any limit cycle. We may also use it to generalize Ralston’s theorem. However, in this latter case, it is more s traightforward to note that if we are considering characteristics converging towards a we dge (for a three-dimensional problem), then in a neighbourhood of the apex of the wedge, ﬁr st order derivatives are negligible compared to second order derivatives; therefor e, in this neighbourhood, (2.18) can be transformed into (2.17) and Ralston’s theorem applie s. 2.4.The critical latitude singularity The preceding discussion has shown (and proved in 2D) that th e velocity ﬁeld of ‘modes’ † associated with an attractor is not square-integrable: it d iverges as the inverse of the distance to the attractor. We shall see now that this singularity is not the only one and t hat a milder one develops around the critical latitude of the inner sphere. Stewartso n & Rickard (1969) were the ﬁrst to notice that singularity and showed that it is integra ble. Although the work of Stewartson & Rickard (1969) was restricted to the thin shell limit and was based on the use of Longuet-Higgins solutions of the Laplace tidal equat ion, we shall show that their result is in fact general. For quick reading demonstrations in §2.4.1 and §2.4.2 can be skipped. 2.4.1. The singular surfaces Let us consider a sphere immersed in a rotating ﬂuid ﬁlling th e whole space. We examine the oscillations of the ﬂuid. Such modes are the corr esponding modes of the full sphere when solutions regular at the origin are replaced by s olutions regular at inﬁnity. As for the full sphere, we use Bryan’s transformation to conv ert the Poincar´ e equation into the Laplace equation. Thus we set z′=−iω αz To solve Laplace’s equation, we therefore use ellipsoidal c oordinates ( ξ,θ,ϕ ) similar to the spherical coordinates (for the angular variables θandϕ): †We use quotes because modes refer usually to regular solutio ns with square-integrable ve- locity ﬁelds.18 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro x=acoshξsinθcosϕ y=acoshξsinθsinϕ z′=asinhξcosθ  (2.25) whereais the focal distance of the meridional ellipse. If we take th e radius of the sphere as the unit of length, then a= 1/α. We recall that using these coordinates, Laplace equation of an axisymmetric ﬁeld transforms into : ∇2V=1 coshξ∂ ∂ξ/parenleftbigg coshξ∂V ∂ξ/parenrightbigg +1 sinθ∂ ∂θ(sinθV) = 0 (2.26) whose solution, regular at inﬁnity, reads: Qℓ(isinhξ)Pℓ(cosθ) (2.27) whereQℓis the second-kind Legendre function. If we now come back to the original coordinates, we may write t he cylindrical coordi- nates (s,z) as s=1 αcoshξsinθ z=i ωsinhξcosθ  (2.28) and following the idea of Greenspan (1969), we introduce µ= cosθandη=isinhξ (2.29) so that αs=/radicalbig (1−µ2)(1−η2) ωz=µη/bracerightbigg (2.30) The Jacobian of this new coordinate transform is J=α2ωs η2−µ2(2.31) where we used ∂µ ∂s=α2sµ ∆,∂µ ∂z=ω(1−µ2)η ∆ ∂η ∂s=−α2sη ∆,∂η ∂z=−ωµ(1−η2) ∆  (2.32) with ∆ =η2−µ2. Hence, the transform is singular on the surfaces such that η=±µ. Since the solution Qℓ(η)Pℓ(µ) is regular in the ﬂuid’s domain, the singularity of the transformation makes the solutions singular when the coord inates map the space in a regular way. To discover which kind of surfaces hinds behind this equatio n (η=±µ), it is convenient to expressξ(orη) as a function of the cylindrical coordinates sandz. Eliminating θ from (2.28) and setting X= sinh2ξ, we ﬁnd that X2+ (1 +ω2z2−α2s2)X+ω2z2= 0Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 19 - + +-- -++ +ωz= 1 +αs ωz=−1 +αs ωz = 1 − αsωz = −1− αs1 α1 ω sz Figure 11. Meridional cross-section of the surfaces (cones) where the coordinate transform is singular. The signs + /−refer to the sign of the discriminant D. The solution of this equation gives the reciprocal transfor mation of coordinates (2.30) or (2.28). When the roots are multiple, the transformation i s singular; this happens when the discriminant Dvanishes which is when D= (1−ωz−αs)(1−ωz+αs)(1 +ωz+αs)(1 +ωz−αs) = 0 (2.33) One may easily verify that this equation is equivalent to η2=µ2. We have therefore shown that the transformation is singular on four surfaces which are cones tangent to the sphere at the critical latitudes. Th is result is summarized in ﬁgure 11. 2.4.2. The velocity ﬁeld near the critical latitudes In order to present in a simple way the singularity of the velo city ﬁeld near the critical latitude, we specialize our reasoning to the case o f the tangent characteristic ωz= 1−αswhich touches the sphere at s=αandz=ω. The velocity component parallel to this characteristic is such that V/bardbl=ωvs−αvz, or iV/bardbl=ω2 α2∂P ∂s+α ω∂P ∂z Using (2.30) and (2.32), we ﬁnd that i∆V/bardbl= (ω2µ/radicalbig 1−η2+α2η/radicalbig 1−µ2)/radicalbig 1−µ2 α∂P ∂µ −(ω2η/radicalbig 1−µ2+α2µ/radicalbig 1−η2)/radicalbig 1−η2 α∂P ∂η Therefore, it turns out that if the right-hand side of this eq uation remains ﬁnite on the singular surface, then the velocity component V/bardbldiverges as 1 /∆ = 1/√ D. In the20 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro neighbourhood of the singular surface, Dvanishes linearly with the distance to this surface; thus we see that the velocity ﬁeld will diverge as on e over square root of the distance to these surfaces as actually found by Stewartson & Rickard (1969) in the case of a thin shell. Let us show that the RHS of the latter equation is indeed ﬁnite . The characteristic ωz= 1−αsis such that µ=η, therefore RHS =µ(1−µ2) α/parenleftbigg∂P ∂µ−∂P ∂η/parenrightbigg µ=η but/parenleftBig ∂P ∂µ−∂P ∂η/parenrightBig µ=η=P′ ℓ(η)Qℓ(η)−Pℓ(η)Q′ ℓ(η) which is the wronskian of the Legendre functions; it is nonzero as PℓandQℓare linearly independent. Finally, using the same kind of arguments one may also prove t hat the component of the velocity ﬁeld in the azimuthal direction is also singu lar while the component perpendicular to the singular surface remains ﬁnite. We therefore see that the velocity ﬁeld possesses an integra ble singularity but is not square-integrable; thus, if strictly quasi-periodic traj ectories of characteristics exist, they would inevitably touch the critical latitude and their asso ciated eigenfunction would be singular. Therefore no eigenvalue can be associated with er godic trajectories of charac- teristics in a spherical shell. 2.5.The toroidal (regular) solutions The foregoing two sections have shown us that inertial ‘mode s’ of a sphericl shell hardly escape to singularities: one question therefore raises up: do regular modes exist at all? the answer is yes, indeed some regular solutions exist in the for m of purely toroidal velocity ﬁelds associated with eigenfrequencies ω= 1/(m+ 1),m∈I N∗. We pointed out these solutions in Rieutord & Valdettaro (199 7) but they appeared independently several times in the literature: Malkus (196 7) noticed them while inves- tigating hydromagnetic planetary waves and Papaloizou & Pr ingle (1978) called them ’r-modes’ because of their similarity with Rossby waves. However, the existence of these solutions is somehow puzzli ng since a plot of the trajectories of characteristics associated with these eig envalues shows that most of them converge towards an attractor (for instance, when m= 2); how can we reconcile these two apparently contradictory facts? The answer lies in the speciﬁc form of the Poincar´ e equation in these cases. Indeed, these modes are purely toroidal which means that for all poin ts in the spherical shell we have/vector er·/vector v= 0. From the expression of the velocity components as a funct ion of the pressure ﬂuctuation (see for instance Rieutord & Noui (1999 )), this constraint can be transformed into the following equation ω α2s∂P ∂s+mP α2−z ω∂P ∂z= 0 ∀(s,z) in the domain When this equation is combined with the Poincar´ e equation, it turns out that the pressure must satisfy α2 ω2/parenleftbiggz s∂2P ∂s∂z−∂2P ∂z2/parenrightbigg −m ωs∂P ∂s−m2P s2= 0 (2.34) The characteristics of this hyperbolic equation obey the di ﬀerential equation: zdzds +s(ds)2= 0Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 21 They are therefore either straight lines parallel to the rot ation axisds= 0 or circles parallel to the boundaries s2+z2=K. They cannot form orbits by reﬂections on the boundaries and therefore they do not impose any constraint o n the solution; regular so- lutions are possible. In fact, because of the circular shape of one family of characteristics, the variables of the problem can be separated and solutions a re regular. Regular inertial modes in a spherical shell therefore exist , but are these toroidal modes the only regular modes? we have no mathematical proof of it bu t numerical computations of the whole spectrum of eigenvalues including viscosity st rongly suggest that this is indeed the case. The argument is as follows: regular modes in a spherical shell meeting stress-free boundary conditions have damping rates propor tional to the viscosity which will turn out to be very small compared to those of singular mo des which, as we shall see, develop shear layers. In a plot of the eigenvalues in the complex plane, regular modes will pop out when the viscosity is suﬃciently low as can be see n in the context of gravity modes in Rieutord & Noui (1999). Computations for diﬀerent m’s show that only one eigenvalue popped out and that is the one of the toroidal mode . 2.6.A summary of the results on the inviscid problem Before jumping into the question of how inertial modes of a sp herical shell behave when a slight amount of viscosity is included, it is certainly usef ul to summarize the main results obtained in the foregoing sections on the inviscid problem. We have seen in §2.3 that the nature (regular or singular) of eigenmodes is, w ith the exception of toroidal modes, determined by the dynamics of c haracteristics. The study of this dynamics ( §2.2) revealed the generic property that characteristics co nverge to attractors made of a periodic orbit which exist in some frequ ency band. These attractors are also characterized by their length ( i.e.the number of reﬂexions) which inﬂuence the rate at which characteristics converge to them; this rate is given by a negative Lyapunov exponent. When the frequency of the attractor is close to sin (pπ/2q) wherepandqbelong to a ﬁnite set of integers determined by the size of the inner c ore, the corresponding attractors are very long and weakly attractive. These frequ encies are the ones for which the shadow of the inner core follows a periodic orbit (see ﬁgu re 5); they will prove to be important in the determination of the asymptotic spectrum o f inertial modes when the viscosity vanishes. The focusing of energy by attractors is not the only source of singularity: we have shown that near the critical latitude of the inner boundary a milder singularity will develop in general. This singularity will prove to be releva nt in the viscous case when shear layers associated with attractors are inhibited. Finally, we found that some regular solutions still exist. T hey are purely toroidal modes and we surmize that they are the only true eigenmodes of a rota ting ﬂuid in a spherical shell. From the mathematical point of view, the point spectr um of the Poincar´ e operator (i.e.eigenvalues associated with square-integrable functions ) is almost empty. 3. The solutions with viscosity 3.1.General results When viscosity is included the equations are elliptic and th e problem is well-posed; hence, the solutions are smooth C∞-functions which can be computed numerically. We shall not describe the method used and refer the reader to Rieutord & Va ldettaro (1997). We just recall that we solve the eigenvalue problem ( λis the complex eigenvalue)22 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro λ/vector u+/vector ez×/vector u=−/vector∇P+E∇2/vector u /vector∇ ·/vector u= 0/bracerightbigg (3.1) with stress-free boundary conditions to eliminate Ekman bo undary layers; E=ν/2ΩR2 is the Ekman number, νbeing the kinematic viscosity. The main result, coming from numerical solutions of this pro blem, is that the amplitude of the modes is concentrated along paths of characteristics drawn by attractors. However, as found by Dintrans et al. (1999) and Rieutord & Valdettaro (1997), the attractor appears in the viscous solutions only when the Ekman number i s low enough. This critical Ekman number, below which the mode seems to reach an asymptotic shape, depends on the length of the attractor; short (and simple) at tractors appear at higher viscosities than long (and complex) attractors which may ne ver appear within the range of physically relevant Ekman numbers ( E>∼10−18). In order to investigate the properties of viscous solutions associated with attractors, we shall focus on a few simple ones which appear at reasonable Ekman numbers ( i.e. larger than 10−9). Some are the ones displayed in ﬁgure 7 plus two others locat ed in the 0.6–0.625 frequency band, one of which was considered by Israeli (1972) using a thin shell. A plot of the eigenmodes associated with these four attracto rs is shown in ﬁgure 12. This ﬁgure displays the kinetic energy of the modes in a merid ional section of the shell. As expected the kinetic energy focuses around the attractor s which we overplot on each diagram; however, this is not systematic as shown by ﬁgure 12 c: there, the kinetic energy concentrates along a characteristic path starting at the cr itical latitude rather than along the (only) existing attractor. We understand this situatio n as the consequence of the location of the attractor: one of its segments is indeed almo st tangential to the outer sphere which therefore inhibits the development of the shea r layer. By computing the distance between the boundary and the attractor, we estimat e that aE1/4-shear layer is inhibited by the boundary if the Ekman number is larger than 1 0−11. Such low Ekman numbers are out of reach numerically at the moment. This exam ple illustrates the point mentioned in §2.2.4: very long attractors will appear at extremely low Ekm an numbers. If we consider that lowest Ekman numbers are those of stars ( ∼10−18) or the Earth’s core (∼10−16) and if we use the same scaling as above for shear layers, then we can conclude (from ﬁgure 9) that attractors longer than ∼100 will never appear in physical systems. We therefore see that, although the singularity associated with an attractor is stronger than that of the critical latitude, this latter singularity may show up if, for some reason, the build up of shear layers around the attractor is inhibite d. We surmise that ‘long’ attractors, will dominate relative to the critical latitud e singularity only at very low Ekman numbers. ‘Short’ attractors may therefore appear mor e easily as in ﬁgure 12a while still showing, weakly, the critical latitude singula rity. Another surprising feature of the rays ( i.e.shear layers) lying along an attractor is that the maximum energy density is not always centered on the attractor (ﬁgure 12b or 12d). We discuss this point below. To make some progress in the understanding of this complex be haviour we shall inves- tigate in more detail the structure of shear layers lying nea r the attractors. 3.2.Structure of shear layersInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 23 Figure 12. Distribution of kinetic energy in the meridional section of the shell for four diﬀerent axisymmetric modes. These solutions have been computed num erically using the same code as in Rieutord & Valdettaro (1997). On each panel, τis the damping rate, stress-free boundary conditions are used, Lis the number of spherical harmonics and Nr is the number of gr id points in the radial direction. (a) shows the mode associated with t he equatorial attractor (in blue) of ﬁgure 7a while the polar attractor (in green) is only weakly v isible. (b) Using a more damped mode with a slightly diﬀerent frequency, we obtain a case whe re the polar attractor is fueled with energy. In (c) the attractor considered by Israeli (197 2) should be fueled, but is in fact hampered by the boundary and the critical latitude singular ity dominates the ﬂow. (d) A very neat mode which concentrates along its attractor; in blue th e corresponding equatorial attractor. 3.2.1. Some numerical results As a preliminary step, we ﬁrst compute the variations of the c omponents of the velocity ﬁeld along a line crossing a ray perpendicularly. Results ar e displayed in ﬁgure 13. These proﬁles show that these internal shear layers have a ra ther complex structure24 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro Figure 13. Left: the real and imaginary parts of Vϕin the cross-section of the attractor displayed in ﬁgure 12a. The segments with positive slope have been show n in cross section. The + sign overplotted on the curves represents the variations of iV/bardbl; the perfect matching with the curves ofVϕshows that the phase quadrature between these components is well veriﬁed as expected from (3.8) or (3.13). The dashed line shows the amplitude of t he\|/vector v\|proﬁle and the two crosses on the y-axis indicate the position of the attractor. Right: same as on left but for a mode with more complex rays: it is a cut through the rays with negative s lope of the mode of ﬁgure 12d; the cut starts near the critical latitude and is perpendicul ar to the rays. which looks like a plane inertial wave trapped in a ‘potentia l well’. Each mode seems to be characterized by the number of nodes in the cross-secti on of its rays, just like a solution of a Sturm-Liouville problem. The analogy cannot, however, be pushed too far since the actual oscillations do not disappear outside the r ays but continue with a very low amplitude (the well is leaking!). This is a consequence o f the fact that the ‘well’ is not a local well but the result of a mapping made by the converg ence of characteristics towards the attractor. We also surmise that since the conver gence rate is not the same on each side of the attractor †, the ‘potential well’ is certainly not symmetric with respe ct to the attractor; we thus explain our ﬁnding that the maxima o f kinetic energy density are not centered right on the attractor as shown by ﬁgures 12b ,d or 13. In the above view, the shear layers result from a balance of th e focusing action of the mapping and the ‘defocusing’ action of viscosity; because t he former action is global and the latter is local, the boundary layer analysis is diﬃcult, if not impossible. The following analysis gives some general properties of these shear layer s, properties which are actually observed numerically, but is not able to reproduce their det ailed structure. 3.2.2. Boundary layer analysis In order to describe the shear layers featuring the inertial modes of a spherical shell, it is convenient to project the equations in the characteris tics’ directions. †We mean here at some ﬁnite distance from the attractor; right on the attractor the conver- gence rate is given by the Lyapunov exponent.Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 25 From (2.7), we derive the expressions of unit vectors parall el (∝ba∇dbl) or perpendicular ( ⊥) to characteristics of positive (+) or negative ( −) slope: /vector e/bardbl ±=ω/vector es±α/vector ez, /vector e⊥ ±=ω/vector ez∓α/vector es Restricting ourselves to the case of a characteristic with p ositive slope, the components of the velocity in a meridional plane are: V/bardbl=ωVs+αVz, V ⊥=−αVs+ωVz We may now transform the equations of motions, written in cyl indrical coordinates, λVs−Vϕ=−∂P ∂s+E∆′Vs λVϕ+Vs=E∆′Vϕ λVz=−∂P ∂z+E∇2Vz  (3.2) into λV/bardbl−ωVϕ=−∂P ∂x+E/parenleftbigg ∇2−ω2 s2/parenrightbigg V/bardbl+αωE s2V⊥ λVϕ+ωV/bardbl−αV⊥=E∇2Vϕ λV⊥+αVϕ=−∂P ∂y+E/parenleftbigg ∇2+α2 s2/parenrightbigg V⊥−αωE s2V/bardbl  (3.3) where ∆′=∇2−1/s2, andxandyare local coordinates respectively parallel and perpendicular to the characteristic. For the sake of simpli city, we may consider one such characteristic so that x=αz+ωs, y =ωz−αs, s =ωx−αy (3.4) Thus ∂ ∂s=ω∂ ∂x−α∂ ∂y,∂ ∂z=α∂ ∂x+ω∂ ∂y Mass conservation requires that ∂V/bardbl ∂x+∂V⊥ ∂y+ωV/bardbl−αV⊥ s(x,y)= 0 (3.5) As it was shown in Rieutord & Valdettaro (1997), the inviscid balance along rays shows a dependence of the velocity and pressure ﬁelds with 1 /√s; we shall remove such a dependence from our equations by setting /vectorV=/vector u/√sandP=p/√s. Hence, (3.3) and (3.5) yield26 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro Figure 14. Shape of the Moore-Saﬀman function with m=−1/3. λu/bardbl−ωuϕ=−∂p ∂x+ωp 2s+E/parenleftbigg ∇2−ω2 s2/parenrightbigg u/bardbl+αωE s2u⊥ λuϕ+ωu/bardbl−αu⊥=E∇2uϕ λu⊥+αuϕ=−∂p ∂y−αp 2s+E/parenleftbigg ∇2+α2 s2/parenrightbigg u⊥−αωE s2u/bardbl ∂u/bardbl ∂x+∂u⊥ ∂y+ωu/bardbl−αu⊥ 2s= 0  (3.6) where now ∇2=∂2 ∂s2+1 4s2+∂2 ∂z2=∂2 ∂x2+∂2 ∂y2+1 4(ωx−αy)2. 3.2.3. The inner E1/3-layer Searching for a boundary layer solution scaling with E1/3, we make the expansion u/bardbl=u/bardbl 0+E1/3u/bardbl 1+··· uϕ=uϕ 0+E1/3uϕ 1+··· u⊥=E1/3u⊥ 1+··· p=E1/3p1+···  (3.7) We shall use the scaled variable Y=y/E1/3. We also recall that λ=iω+τ, (ω,τ)∈I R2 and that \|τ\| ≪ \|ω\|. From the second and third equations of (3.6) at zeroth order we get uϕ 0=iu/bardbl 0andαuϕ 0=−∂p1 ∂Y(3.8) while from the combination of ﬁrst order terms we getInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 27 AA′ BC• ••• ℓ Figure 15. Motion of the virtual source after a reﬂection: the source Amoves to A′after the reﬂection of the ray. ∂3uϕ 0 ∂Y3=−iα∂uϕ 0 ∂x(3.9) Making a last change of variables q=x/αand dropping the zero-index, we ﬁnally obtain ∂3uϕ ∂Y3=−i∂uϕ ∂q(3.10) which was ﬁrst derived by Moore & Saﬀman (1969) for steady (ve rtical) shear layers. Moore and Saﬀman have shown that the solutions of (3.10) whic h can describe a detached shear-layer are self-similar solutions of the for m: uϕ=qmHm/parenleftBig Y/q1/3/parenrightBig (3.11) where the function Hmis deﬁned by Hm(t) =/integraldisplay∞ 0e−ipte−p3p−3m−1dp Since (3.11) describes detached shear layers, the function Hmneeds to vanish when t→ ±∞ which is possible only if m <0 (Moore & Saﬀman 1969). The shape of this function is given in ﬁgure 14. To complete the description of the1 3layer we need to determine the index mof the Moore and Saﬀman function. For this purpose, we ﬁrst note fro m (3.11) that the width of the layer is singular at the origin of the x-axis. This origin can therefore be considered as a virtual source of the ray which obviously lies outside th e ﬂuid’s container. Let us therefore consider a segment of a mode around an attractor. L et us orient the x-axis in the direction of contraction of the map and call x0the abscisse of the ﬁrst point of this segment (point Bin ﬁgure 15). At Bthe width of the layer is proportional to x1/3 0while28 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro the amplitude of uϕis proportional to xm 0Hm(0). AtCand before reﬂection, the width is (x0+ℓ)1/3and the amplitude is ( x0+ℓ)mHm(0); after reﬂection, the mapping changes the scale by a factor K; therefore the width is now ( x0+ℓ)1/3Kand the amplitude (x0+ℓ)mHm(0)/K. The width is just as though the virtual source A′were at a distance (x0+ℓ)K3ofCwhile the amplitude would imply a distance ( x0+ℓ)K−1/m; since the segment starting at Cmust also be a solution of the form (3.11), the new virtual sou rce must be at the same position for both the amplitude and width; therefore, we need to have m=−1 3(3.12) This index was also found by Stewartson (1972a) on the argume nt that it is the only one for which the ﬂux /integraldisplay+∞ −∞V/bardbldY is conserved along the ray, which means that the1 3layer does no pumping. From the property that Hm(t)∼t3mast→ ∞, we see that the solution (3.11) is independent of xfar from the layer and decreases as 1 /y. 3.2.4. The outer E1/4-layer Since some modes show a clear scaling of their ray with the1 4exponent (see Rieutord & Valdettaro 1997), we also brieﬂy discuss this case. As the1 4-layer is also much larger than the Ekman layer, the ϕ- and∝ba∇dbl-components are in quadrature, i.e., Vϕ=iV/bardbl (3.13) These components also verify, from mass conservation and in viscid balance, Vϕ=F(y/E1/4)/√s. We cannot say much more about the1 4-layer, except that the expansions to higher orders including viscous terms lead to a diﬀerential equati on forFwhich is not closed, some additional functions missing their diﬀerential equat ion. If these extra and undeter- mined functions are set to zero, Fobeys, as expected, a fourth order diﬀerential equation whose solutions do not agree (in general) with the numerical results. We think that this is due to the action of the mapping which is obviously missing in the local analysis; unfortunately, we have not yet found a way to include it. 3.2.5. Wave packet kinematics In order to give a more physical understanding of the behavio ur of shear layers as viscosity is reduced, we propose to consider a wave packet tr aveling around an attractor. Let us suppose that the Ekman number is very small but ﬁnite. W hen traveling along an attractor a wave packet is damped by viscosity but its reﬂe ctions on the boundaries enhance it if the direction of propagation is such that the ma p is contracting (Λ <0); this equilibrium may be written as: e−ν/summationtext nk2 ntn=eNΛ(3.14) whereNis the length of the attractor, Λ its Lyapunov exponent †,tnthe time elapsed †recall that according to the deﬁnition of the Lyanunov expon ent,eΛis the mean dilation rate (of an interval δφ) per bounce.Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 29 on the nth-segment and knthe wavenumber of the nth-segment. Noting that on each segment the group velocity is almost constant and reads: vg= 2Ωks k2 we may transform (3.14) into Λ =−E N√ 1−ω2/summationdisplay nk3 nℓn (3.15) where we have introduced the length ℓnof each segment of the attractor; we also used the fact that ks=k√ 1−ω2so thattn=ℓnkn/√ 1−ω2and all quantities are now dimensionless. Since kn=Cnkn−1,Cn>1 being the contraction coeﬃcient of the nth reﬂection, we may rewrite (3.15) Λ =−Ek3 1 N√ 1−ω2N/summationdisplay n=1ℓnn/productdisplay i=2C3 i=−Ek3 1F(ω) (3.16) where F(ω) =1 N√ 1−ω2N/summationdisplay n=1ℓnn/productdisplay i=2C3 i is a purely geometrical quantity describing the path of char acteristics associated with the attractor at the frequency ω. The expression (3.16) expresses through (3.14) the strict periodicity of the amplitude of the velocity ﬁeld along an at tractor when viscosity is small but ﬁnite. A similar relation may be derived if we now express that the sc ale of a wave packet must be the same after one cycle along the attractor. In a purely di ﬀusive (viscous) process, the scale of a structure, initially being ‘ a’ grows like√ a2+νtwith time; therefore the relation between the layer’s width after one propagation an d one reﬂection is an=Dn/radicalBig a2 n−1+νtn−1 (3.17) HereDnis the dilation coeﬃcient of the nth-reﬂection ( Dn= 1/Cn<1). Along one cycle with N reﬂections, we have Λ =1 NlnN/productdisplay n=1Dn Using the fact that aN+1=a1, (3.17) leads to: Λ =−1 2NN/summationdisplay n=1ln/parenleftbigg 1 +νtn a2n/parenrightbigg (3.18) Now, if we let the width of rays anscale with Eσ, we ﬁnd that νtn/a2 n∼E1−3σ; imposing 0 <σ< 1/3, we ﬁnally obtain Λ =−E 2N√ 1−ω2/summationdisplay nℓnkn a2n Noting that an∼λn= 2π/kn, we recover (3.15) except for a constant factor. The two derivations of the Lyapunov exponent through this sc hematic model show that30 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4λ/π00.050.10.150.20.251/N 0.662 0.664 0.666 0.668 0.67 4λ/π00.0050.011/N Figure 16. Left: The inverse of the length Nof all the attractors with a length less than 100 for a spherical shell with η= 0.35 are represented with a () denoting the frequency (or crit ical latitude) where Λ = 0 and with a line segment showing the inter val of existence. By showing the projection of the on the x-axis, we try to give an idea of w hat would be the asymptotic spectrum neglecting very long attractors. The two vertical lines show the position of π/8 and π/6 which correspond to the periodic orbits of the shadow for η= 0.35. Right: A blow-up of the region around π/6; note the lengthening of the attractors as this value is app roached. the width of shear layers lying along a periodic attractor an d scaling with Eσ, should be such that σ<1 3 We therefore see that the1 3-exponent is a limit case. In fact this inequality shows that ‘naked’1 3-layers cannot exist and should be embeded in thicker layers ; this seems to be the case indeed, at least for all the modes which we investiga ted in detail: they usually showσ≃1/4. 3.3.The asymptotic spectrum The foregoing calculations show one important result: As vi scosity tends to zero and sincek1∝E−σ, from (3.16) we may conclude that the Lyapunov exponent of at tractors must vanish as viscosity vanishes following the law Λ ∝E1−3σ. It therefore turns out that eigenfrequencies will converge towards the roots ωiof the equation Λ( ω) = 0 which therefore describe the asymptotic spectrum of inertial mod es in a spherical shell. From the fact that only a ﬁnite number of attractors exist at a give n frequency, we deduce that the spectrum cannot be dense in [0,1] contrary to the case of t he full sphere. However, this spectrum has some accumulation points ωawhich are due to the existence of neutral (Λ = 0) periodic orbits with frequencies sin pπ/2q(see§2.2.2). Indeed, in the neighbour- hood of such points we may ﬁnd attractors which are longer and longer, the closer they are toωa. However, the number of accumulation points is ﬁnite and giv en by the number of pairs (p,q) possible for periodic orbits of the shadow and when η≥1/√ 2 only three such points ( ω= 0,1/√ 2,1) exist. In ﬁgure 16 we clearly see the accumulation points c or- responding to sin( π/4) and sin(π/6)†. Whenη→0, the number of accumulation points gets larger and larger, as more and more rationals are added t o the set of accumulation †The case sin( π/8) is not as clear for it needs a much higher frequency resolut ion since the shadow almost ﬁlls the whole volume as π/8∼arcsin(0 .35).Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 31replacemen Figure 17. Distribution of the least-damped eigenvalues in the com- plex plane when E= 10−8with resolution Lmax=700 and Nr=270. The dotted line shows π/6 while hatched bands indicate the positions of three simple attractors; η= 0.35.Figure 18. Asymptotic behaviour of the eigenvalue associated with the eigenmode plotted in ﬁgure 12a. The dashed line repre- sents ω−ωaswhere ωasis in fact ω1given by (B2) (cf appendix B), while the dotted line is for the damping rate. The solid line represents the ‘theoretical’ law E1/2. points, a situation in accordance with the fact that at η= 0 the spectrum is dense in [0,1]. Let us also underline the fact that when E= 0, eigenvalues disappear since solutions of the equations are no longer square-integrable; this is al so true for frequencies of at- tractors such that Λ = 0, since attractors still focus the ene rgy (but algebraically, not exponentially). For a given upper bound of the damping rate, eigenvalues will be packed around the rootsωiand around the allowed frequencies of the set sin( pπ/2q). In ﬁgure 17, we computed the distribution of least-damped eigenvalues whe nE= 10−8,i.e.for 140 evenly spaced frequencies between 0 and 1 /√ 2, we computed the eight least-damped modes. This ﬁgure oﬀers a glimpse at the asymptotic distribu tion of eigenvalues in the complex plane: we clearly see three main bands †of attractors where modes are more damped and the two frequencies sin( π/6) and sin(π/4) where least-damped modes tend to accumulate; the sin( π/4) case is conspicuous. Note also the similarity with ﬁgure 1 6 where the three bands made by the aforementioned attractors are also clearly visible. From the asymptotic behaviour (2.16) of the Lyapunov expone nt in the vicinity of the rootsωi, we can derive that ω=ωi+aE2−6σ+··· while an order of magnitude evaluation of the ratio of dissip ation to kinetic energy yields the asymptotic law of the damping rate τ τ=−bE1−2σ+··· †They are [0 .3959,0.4162], [0 .5290,0.5554] and [0 .6,0.6266]; the ﬁrst and third are illustrated by attractors in ﬁgure 12; the second is illustrated in Rieut ordet al. (2000); for all η= 0.35.32 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro This asymptotic behaviour of eigenvalues is best illustrat ed in ﬁgure 18 where σ= 1/4. Such a mode is the least-damped one in its frequency range a nd is therefore not perturbed by other eigenvalues. This is likely the reaso n why it shows its asymptotic regime at rather ‘high’ Ekman numbers. Concerning the eigenmodes, it is worth noting that (2.16) an d (B 9) imply that the spacing of adjacent rays scales like E1/4(ifσ= 1/4); therefore, the distance between two rays of an attractor remains the same when it is rescaled by E1/4and one may conclude that each mode in the form of a viscous attractor keeps a self- similar structure as the Ekman number vanishes. 4. Discussion Ending this paper, we think that the asymptotic behaviour of inertial modes in a spherical shell when the Ekman number vanishes can be antici pated even if some points remain in the shadows. We have seen at the beginning of the paper that the trajectori es of characteristics in general converge towards an attractor; exceptions are when the sphere is full or the inner core is small enough to let a ﬁnite number of periodic orbits r emain (which are associated with critical latitudes commensurable with π). Leaving the full sphere for which analytical solutions exist since Bryan (1889), the generic behaviour o f characteristics is that they converge towards an attractor which is a periodic orbit resi ding in some frequency band. The knowledge of the characteristic trajectories can be use d immediately in two- dimensional problems in order to construct a solution of the inviscid problem. This solution contains an arbitrary function which needs to be sp eciﬁed on some fundamental interval(s). This makes the eigenvalues always inﬁnitely d egenerate. In three dimensions, the trajectories cannot be used so eﬃciently but their conve rgence towards an attractor can be used to show the divergence of the velocity ﬁeld at zero viscosity. In two dimen- sions, this divergence allowed us to prove the non-square-i ntegrability of velocity ﬁelds associated with attractors, implying the absence of eigenv alues in a large fraction of the frequency band [0 ,2Ω]. Beside the singularities generated by attractors, we also s hed new light on the singu- larity arising at the critical latitude of the inner shell. W e thus generalized the result of Stewartson & Rickard (1969) that the velocity ﬁeld diverges as the inverse of the square root of the distance to the characteristic grazing the inner shell; this singularity also makes the velocity ﬁeld not square-integrable. Among all these singular solutions, a small set of regular mo des ‘survive’: they are purely toroidal modes which, thanks to a velocity ﬁeld which has no radial component, do not suﬀer the constraints imposed by characteristics pat hs. Numerical computations of the whole spectrum give a strong evidence that these modes are the only regular ones. When viscosity is included, all the aforementioned singula rities appear in the form of shear layers. In the asymptotic r´ egime, we therefore expec t that attractors will feature the viscous solutions. However, this asymptotic r´ egime ma y be reached at extremely low values of the Ekman number, some of which may not even be re levant astrophysi- cally or geophysically. We may therefore face some intermed iate r´ egime where the milder singularity at critical latitude plays an important part in featuring the amplitude of a mode. Our numerical investigations of the structure of shear laye rs which are generated by the diﬀerent singularities revealed a rather complex structur e of nested layers scaling with Eσ, 0<σ< 1/3 where the value σ= 1/4 seems to be favoured. In some simple cases, where the velocity ﬁeld shows no node in the transverse direction o f a shear layer, numericalInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 33 results indeed show a scaling with E1/4. Our boundary layer analysis demonstrated that all these internal layers should contain an inner σ=1 3-layer which is similar to the vertical Stewartson layers; however, the mapping made by ch aracteristics inﬂuences the scales larger than E1/3and therefore makes a local analysis insuﬃcient to determin e the structure of the outer parts of the layers. The upper bound σ<1/3 has been derived using a heuristic model of an inertial wave packet traveling along an attractor; from this model, we als o showed that the asymptotic spectrum of eigenvalues can be derived, once the structure o f the shear layer can be computed. An important result of this analysis is that the li mits of eigenfrequencies as E→0, do not form a dense set in [0 ,2Ω] contrary to the case of the full sphere. The asymptotic behaviour of inertial modes and their associ ated eigenvalues is there- fore slowly becoming clearer: As the Ekman number decreases , more and more eigen- modes are concentrated along the attractors associated wit h their frequency; once this asymptotic regime is reached the frequency of the mode chang es slowly with viscosity so that the Lyapunov exponent of the attractor decreases (in absolute value) and con- verges toward the frequency where this exponent is zero. We a re thus in the position of describing r´ egimes with extremely low values of the Ekman n umbers that are relevant in astrophysics ( E= 10−18for a radiative zone of a star) or geophysics ( E= 10−15for the liquid core of the Earth) and which are way out of reach numeri cally. However, some points remain in the shadows, the most challen ging one being the structure of the shear layers. As we observed, this structur e builds up from a large scale phenomenon which is represented by the mapping of character istics and a small-scale one which is diﬀusion. To the best of our knowledge, such a pro blem has never been investigated in the past. Since the three-dimensional case is much more involved than the two dimensional case, because of the intrusion of Rieman n functions, we think that this latter case should be investigated ﬁrst; this will be th e subject of future work. The foregoing results were derived from the analysis of iner tial waves of a ﬂuid con- tained in a spherical shell but it is clear that they are of wid er generality. They can be easily generalized to any container of the same topology, like ellipsoidal shells, or be used qualitatively for any kind of container. In the case of e llipsoidal shells, even axial symmetry can be relaxed: since constraints imposed by chara cteristic surfaces are in a meridional plane, no small-scale should appear in the ϕ-direction. Attractors are robust structures and only the longest ones are sensitive to small m odiﬁcations of the shape of the boundaries; however, as they would transform into other long attractors, the ﬁnal solution would not be much aﬀected. This kind of ‘structural stability’ is important when applying these results to real objects like the core of the Ea rth which is obviously not a perfect spherical shell (see the discussion in Rieutord 200 0a). Our results also naturally extend to all systems governed by a spatially hyperbolic equations. Hence, one will ﬁnd similar properties for gravi ty modes (Maas & Lam 1995; Rieutord & Noui 1999) or hydromagnetic modes (Malkus 1967). Now the next question raised by our results concern their imp lications when the modes are of ﬁnite amplitude. These may concern the development of the elliptic instability since this instability is precisely an instability of inertial mo des (see Rieutord 2000a) or may aﬀect the transport properties of the ﬂuid which are much enh anced around attractors (Maas et al. 1997; Dintrans et al. 1999; Dauxois & Young 1999). In the same context, one may wonder whether the attractors ca n be studied exper- imentally. At the moment, only one attractor has been detect ed experimentally, using gravity waves of a stably stratiﬁed ﬂuid (Maas et al.1997) or inertial waves (Maas 2000). The main obstacle for detecting attractors with experiment s is the rather large value of34 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro the Ekman number of experiments. Numerical calculations ha ve indeed shown that this number should not exceed a few 10−8. Using water in a spherical shell with a radius of 20 cm demands a rotational speed of 12000 rpm which is diﬃcult to achieve and raises experimental problems. Also attractors should not be confu sed with other phenomena which emphasize characteristics paths like the critical la titude singularity or a forced perturbation like a discontinuity in velocity forced by bou ndary conditions (e.g. the split disk case). Finally, these new features of inertial modes may also have s ome interesting conse- quences in astrophysics. It is now well-known that rapidly r otating neutron stars can lose a substantial amount of angular momentum when some iner tial modes become un- stable because of a coupling with gravitational radiation ( see Andersson 1998; Lindblom et al. 1998). This instability therefore controls the rotation sp eed limit of neutron stars and this limit would be the higher, the more damped are inerti al modes. Stars with a core or density jump will therefore be more stable than other s, a fact which may be used to give new constraints on the state of matter inside neutron stars (Rieutord 2000b). We wish to thank Keith Aldridge and Leo Maas for helpful discu ssions and a careful reading of the manuscript. We acknowledge support from the G dR CNRS/IFREMER 1074 (M´ ecanique des Fluides G´ eophysique et Astrophysiqu es). Part of the calculations have been carried out on the Cray C98 of the ‘Institut du D´ eve loppement et des Ressources en Informatique Scientiﬁque’ (IDRIS) and on the CalMip mach ine of the ‘Centre Interuni- versitaire de Calcul de Toulouse’ (CICT) which are grateful ly acknowledged. Appendix A. arcsin(/radicalbig 3/7) In this appendix, we show in which cases sin( pπ/q) is the square root of a rational. This establishes that/radicalbig 3/7 is not the sinus of any rational fraction of π. The proof may exist in the mathematical literature, but we have not been ab le to locate it; we therefore propose here a simple proof of the result. Letp/qbe a rational number, pandqbeing coprimes, and let us suppose that sin(pπ/q) =/radicalbig a/b, wherea/bis a rational number. Then cos2 pπ/q = 1−2 sin2pπ/q will be a rational number. Let us take ﬁrst the case where qis prime. Then exp(2 ipπ/q) is aqthroot of unity, and as such is a solution of: Xq−1+Xq−2+···+ 1 = 0, (A 1) providedq>1. But one has also: Xq−1+Xq−2+···+ 1 =q−1/productdisplay m=1/parenleftBig X−ei2mπ/q/parenrightBig , (A 2) since the exp( i2mπ/q),m= 1,...,q −1 are roots of the polynomial (called cyclotomic polynomial). Since exp(i2pπ/q) is root of this polynomial, so is exp( −i2pπ/q), and they are diﬀerent ifq>2. The product (A2) thus contains (X−exp(i2pπ/q))(X−exp(−i2pπ/q)) =X2−2Xcos(2pπ/q) + 1 (A 3) Therefore, since cos(2 pπ/q) is rational, X2−2Xcos(2pπ/q) + 1 is a rational polynomial, which divides the cyclotomic polynomial Xq−1+Xq−2+...+ 1. But Gauss proved (seeInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 35 Jacobson (1985) p. 272) that this polynomial is irreducible in the ﬁeld of rationals if qis prime. Therefore the degree of this polynomial, which is q−1, cannot exceed two, since otherwise it would be reducible. So q= 1,2,3 are the only possibilities. Ifqis not prime, then the polynomial Xq−1+Xq−2+...+ 1 is not irreducible. But exp(2ipπ/q) is still a qthroot of unity. If exp(2 ipmπ/q )∝ne}ationslash= 1 for all m < q , one says that exp(2ipπ/q) is a primitive qthroot of unity. exp( i2pπ/q) is a primitive qthroot of unity since pis prime to q(Hardy & Wright (1975)). Then obviously exp( −i2pπ/q) is a primitive qthroot, diﬀerent from exp( i2pπ/q) sinceq >2. Therefore the polynomial whose roots are all the primitive qthroots of unity contains the factor (A3). But this polynomial is irreducible in Q (cyclotomic polynomial) (see Hardy & Wright (1975), Jacobson (1985)). So if the degree of the polynomial is great er than two, there is a contradiction. The degree of the polynomial is equal to the E uler function φ(q) which is the number of positive integers not greater than and prime to q. One hasφ(q)>2 for q>6. Therefore the only possible values for qareq= 1,2,3,4,6. By direct veriﬁcation, one sees that/radicalbig 3/7 is not sin( pπ/q) for one of these q. Appendix B. Lyapunov exponent of two attractors B.1.Some example of Lyapunov exponents B.1.1. Parameters of the equatorial attractor The equatorial attractor drawn in ﬁgure 7a exists for all λ’s such that the following equation has a root for φ4∈[0,λ[, the latitude of the point of reﬂection on the inner sphere, 6λ= arccos(ηcos(λ+φ4)) + arccos( ηcos(λ−φ4)) as can be derived from the relations φ1+φ2= 2λ φ2+φ3=−2λ cos(φ1+λ) =ηcos(φ4+λ) cos(φ3−λ) =ηcos(φ4−λ)  (B 1) The frequency band [ ω1,ω2[ where this attractor exists is such that: ω1=√1−η 2andω2= sinλ2,with cos(6 λ2−arccosη) =ηcos(2λ2) (B 2) Ifη= 0.35, we ﬁnd ω1= 0.403112887 and ω2= 0.412474677. For this orbit the Lyapunov exponent is given by Λ(ω) =−1 4lnC(ω) (B 3) whereC(ω) is the contraction coeﬃcient (this orbit is attracting whe n it is followed in the trigonometric sense). Using the colatitudes of the reﬂe ction points, it can be obtained with C=C1C2C3C4=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsinglesin(φ1−λ) sin(φ1+λ)sin(φ2+λ) sin(φ2−λ)sin(φ3−λ) sin(φ3+λ)sin(φ4+λ) sin(φ4−λ)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle If we use the fact that φ1+φ2= 2λandφ2+φ3=−2λ, we ﬁnally get36 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro Λ(ω) =−1 4ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsinglesin(φ3−λ) sin(φ3+ 5λ)sin(φ4+λ) sin(φ4−λ)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(B 4) Such a relation can also be obtained by diﬀerentiation of the formulae relating the anglesφ1,φ3andφ4in the third and fourth relations of (B 1); this yields: dφ1 dφ3=sin(φ3−λ) sin(φ3+ 5λ)sin(φ4+λ) sin(φ4−λ)(B 5) B.1.2. The associated polar attractor Reﬂection points of this attractor (left in ﬁgure 7a) are rel ated by: φ1+φ4= 2λ φ2+φ3= 2λ φ3+φ4=−2λ cos(φ2+λ) =ηcos(φ5+λ) −cos(φ1+λ) =ηcos(φ5−λ)  (B 6) which implies solving 8λ= arccos(ηcos(φ5+λ)) + arccos( −ηcos(λ−φ5)) (B 7) forλ≤φ5≤π/2. The bounds of the interval of existence are [ λ1,λ2] such that cos(8λ1−arccos( −η)) =ηcos2λ1 cos4λ2+ηsinλ2= 0 Here Λ(λ1) =−∞, Λ(λ2) = 0. When η= 0.35 we ﬁndω1= 0.395915 and ω2= 0.416185. In a similar way as we derived (B 4), we ﬁnd that for the polar or bit, the Lyapunov exponent reads Λ(ω) =−1 5ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsinglesin(λ+φ1) sin(7λ−φ1)sin(λ+φ5) sin(λ−φ5)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(B 8) B.2. Λ in the neighbourhood of the point where Λ = 0 B.2.1. General result In this subsection we prove that generically near a critical latitudeλ0which displays a periodic orbit having Λ = 0, the Lyapunov exponent behaves l ike the square root of the variation of the critical latitude. Actually, this is a g eneral result valid for a one- dimensional mapping that depends on one control parameter ( λin our case) near a tangent bifurcation point, provided the mapping is suﬃcien tly smooth there. Letf(φ,λ) be the mapping (for φ, in our case it is fN(φ) withfdeﬁned in (2.11) and Nis the period of the orbit) depending on the parameter λ. Letλ0be the value of λfor which Λ = 0, and φ0the ﬁxed point of the corresponding map ( f(φ0,λ0) =φ0).λ0is a bifurcation point, as illustrated in ﬁgure 19, and therefor e∂f/∂φ \|φ0,λ0= 1. Letφ1be a ﬁxed point for the mapping at λ1nearλ0:φ1=f(φ1,λ1). Let us deﬁne fij≡∂i+jf ∂φi∂λj/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle φ0,λ0, δφ ≡φ1−φ0, δλ ≡λ1−λ0Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 37 ,λ)f( Aφ1f(,λ1) Aφ1 φ1Rλ1f(,)φ1φ R φλ0f(,)φ0λ0λ1 0φ Figure 19. Generic behaviour of the mapping near a tangent bifurcation point ( φ0, λ0). A Taylor expansion of faround (φ0,λ0) up to order 2 yields: f(φ1,λ1) =f(φ0,λ0) +f10δφ+f01δλ+1 2f20δφ2+1 2f02δλ2+f11δλδφ+... Sincef(φ1,λ1) =φ1,f(φ0,λ0) =φ0, andf10= 1, we get: f20δφ2+ 2f11δλδφ+ 2f01δλ+f02δλ2= 0 Solving this equation for δφgives: δφ=−f11δλ±/radicalbig (f2 11−f20f02)δλ2−2f01f20δλ f20 for the coordinates of the two ﬁxed points at λ1,φA 1andφR 1. To leading order in δλwe obtain: δφ∼ ±/radicalBigg −2f01 f20√ δλ (B 9) That is, the displacement of the ﬁxed point δφbehaves like the square root of the variation of the control parameter λ. We compute ﬁnally the Lyapunov exponent associated with the mapping at ( φ1,λ1): Λ = ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle∂f ∂φ/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle φ1,λ1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle∼ln\|f10+f20δφ+f11δλ+...\| ∼ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1±f20/radicalBigg −2f01 f20√ δλ/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle∼ ±f20/radicalBigg −2f01 f20√ δλ The positive value corresponds to the repulsive ﬁxed point φR 1=φ0+/radicalBig −2f01 f20√ δλ, while the negative value is associated with the attractive ﬁ xed pointφA 1=φ0−/radicalBig −2f01 f20√ δλ. Therefore it follows that if Λ( ω0) = 0 for an attractor, then, Λ(ω)≃ −A/radicalbig \|ω−ω0\| in the neighbourhood of ω0.38 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro B.2.2. Example of the equatorial attractor Let us diﬀerentiate relation (B 3) dΛ dω=−1 4CcosλdC dλ whereCis given in (B 5) for instance. We introduce now the new variab lesα=φ4and φ=φ3so thatCreads C=sin(φ−λ) sin(5λ+φ)sin(α+λ) sin(α−λ) We now evaluatedC dλat the point where Λ = 0; let us call λ0this point, it follows that: dC dλ(λ0) = 2α′cotλ0−2(2 +φ′)cot3λ0 (B 10) whereα′=dα/dλ andφ′=dφ/dλ . We used the fact that λ0veriﬁes cos3λ0=ηcosλ0 Using now (B 1), we have cos(5λ+φ) =ηcos(λ+α) cos(λ−φ) =ηcos(λ−α)/bracerightbigg (B 11) which we diﬀerentiate with respect to λ (5 +φ′)sin(5λ+φ) =η(1 +α′)sin(λ+α) (1−φ′)sin(λ−φ) =η(1−α′)sin(λ−α)/bracerightbigg (B 12) and solve that system for α′andφ′. Its determinant is ∆ =ηsin(λ−α)sin(5λ+φ)(1−e−4Λ) which yields ∆≃4Ληsinλ0sin 3λ0 in the vicinity of λ0. Setting φ′=Nφ ∆,andα′=Nα ∆ it turns out that Nφ(λ0) = 2ηsinλ0f(λ0)∝ne}ationslash= 0 Nα(λ0) = 2 sin3λ0f(λ0)∝ne}ationslash= 0 withf(λ) =ηsinλ−3 sin3λ. This shows that α′andφ′tend to inﬁnity in λ0. After substitution it turns out that f(λ0) =−(3 +η)/radicalbig 1−η Hence dC dλ(λ0) =cosλ0 ΛH(η) with H(η) =−4(η+ 3) η√1−η/bracketleftbigg 1−η2 (η+ 2)2/bracketrightbigg ThereforeInertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 39 2φ3φ2φ3 φ3() φ1 φ2()(φ) φf In f-n φ f-n Figure 20. Generic illustration of the mapping fnin the neighbourhood of an attractive ﬁxed point φ1.φ2is the point of discontinuity nearest to φ1. The interval I= [f−n(φ2), f−n(φ3)[, after application of the mapping fn, enters the basin of attraction of φ1. dΛ dω=−H(η) 4Λ and ﬁnally Λ =−/radicalbig H/2(ω−ω1)1/2 Atω1we thus have Λ (ω−ω1)1/2→/bracketleftbigg2(η+ 3) η√1−η/parenleftbigg 1−η2 (η+ 2)2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg1/2 =G(η) Ifη= 0.35, thenG(η) = 4.8184134. Appendix C. The number of attractors at a given frequency We show here that the number of periodic orbits for a given fre quency is bounded by the number of discontinuous points. To demonstrate this point, let us suppose the mapping has pdiscontinuities. This means that fkwill havekpdiscontinuities, since the image of any discontinuous poin t is a discontinuous point. This means that fkisC∞onkpinterval. Each interval is bounded by two discontinuous points. When an attractor of period nappears, it means that the orbit bounces ntimes on the outer shell. Therefore, nintervals in the graph of fnwill cross the straight line y=x, where they will be locked in subsequent iterations of fn. We shall denote by φ1the attractive point closest to the end of the interval, and b y φ2the nearest discontinuous point of fn, which bounds the locked interval; thus, [ φ1,φ2[ belongs to the basin of attraction of fn. Now,φ1is a ﬁxed point of fnand therefore of any iteration of fnorf−n. On the contrary, φ2is not. It is a point of discontinuity offn, therefore f−n(φ2) is a point of discontinuity of f2n. Thus,f−n([φ1,φ2[) belongs to the basin of attraction of f2n; since, in general, f−n(φ2)∝ne}ationslash=φ2,f−n([φ1,φ2[) is not a continuous interval and we see that the basin of attraction o ff2ncontains at least two40 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro intervals: [φ1,φ2[ and some other interval in the neighbourhood of f−n(φ2) (for instance I=]f−n(φ2),f−n(φ3)] in ﬁgure 20). Therefore at the stage 2 n, one of the new intervals created falls into the basin. This is true near all the nattracting points of fn, son additional intervals fall into the basin at the stage 2 n. Afternother iterations, f−2n(φ2) will be a new point of discontinuity of f3n, not present in fnandf2n, and the same argument shows that nadditional intervals at least fall into the basin at stage 3 n. This indicates that for each niteration,nadditional intervals (at least) are in the basin of attraction of the attractor of period n. Let us therefore consider a case with two attractors of period n1andn2; aftern1iterations we get n1pintervals bounded by discontinuities but the attractor has captured n1intervals; therefore outside the basin of attraction of the ﬁrst attractor, we have, for the n1-iterate,n1(p−1) ‘free’ intervals at most; if the mapping is iterated n1n2times, we have n1n2(p−1) free intervals. These free intervals contain the basin of attraction of the second attr actor; but after n1n2iterations the second attractor has captured n1n2intervals, therefore only n1n2(p−1)−n1n2= n1n2(p−2) are really free. Following this reasoning for a third attr actor, we would get n1n2n3(p−3) free intervals left. Thus not more than p attractors can ex ist simultaneously. It is interesting to note that numerically the number of attr actors was always found smaller or equal to p/2. We note that the argument above is actually an upper bound. In practice, the preimage of [ φ2,φ1] can include other points of discontinuity already existing, and more than nintervals can fall in the basin after each niterations of the mapping. The above argument is valid provided there is only one attrac tive point by interval between two discontinuous points. Actually, we never found through extensive numerical simulations of the mapping, a case where several attracting orbits coexist on the same interval (apart for the values of the frequency where famili es of neutral orbits exist). Actually, such a case would be related to a period-doubling b ifurcation which cannot exist in our system since one cannot cross the straight line y=xwith a negative derivative. Even if several orbits can coexist on a given interval, this w ill happen at a ﬁnite iteration of the mapping and the total number of periodic orbits will re main ﬁnite, since the argument above shows that the number of such intervals is ﬁni te. REFERENCES Andersson, N. 1998 A new class of unstable modes of rotating relativistic s tars.Astrophys. J. 502, 708. Arnold, V. I. 1989Mathematical methods of classical mechanics . Springer. Bourgin, D. & Duffin, R. 1939 The Dirichlet problem for the vibrating string equatio n.Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 45, 851–859. Bryan, G. 1889 The waves on a rotating liquid spheroid of ﬁnite ellipti city.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.180, 187–219. Cartan, E. 1922 Sur les petites oscillations d’une masse ﬂuide. Bull. Sci. Math. 46, 317–352, 356–369. Colombo, S. 1976Les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles en physique et en m ´ ecanique des milieux continus . Masson. Dautray, R. & Lions, J.-L. 1984-1985 Analyse math´ ematique et calcul num´ erique . Masson. Dauxois, T. & Young, W. R. 1999 Near critical reﬂection of internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 390, 271–295. Dintrans, B., Rieutord, M. & Valdettaro, L. 1999 Gravito-inertial waves in a rotating stratiﬁed sphere or spherical shell. J. Fluid Mech. 398, 271–297. Fotheringham, P. & Hollerbach, R. 1998 Inertial oscillations in a spherical shell. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 89, 23–43.Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell: attractors an d asymptotic spectrum 41 Franklin, J. 1972 Axisymmetric inertial oscillations of a rotating ﬂuid .J. Math. Anal. Appl. 39, 742–760. Friedlander, F. G. & Heins, A. E. 1968 On a singular boundary value problem for the Euler-Darboux equation. J. Diﬀ. Equations 4, 460–491. Greenspan, H. P. 1969The theory of rotating ﬂuids . Cambridge University Press. Hardy, G. & Wright, E. 1975An introduction to the theory of numbers . Oxford Univ. Press. Høiland, E. 1962 Discussion of a hyperbolic equation relating to inerti a and gravitational ﬂuid oscillations. Geofys. Publ. 24, 211–227. Hollerbach, R. & Kerswell, R. 1995 Oscillatory internal shear layers in rotating and pre- cessing ﬂows. J. Fluid Mech. 298, 327–339. Israeli, M. 1972 On trapped modes of rotating ﬂuids in spherical shells. Studies in Applied Math. 51, 219–237. Jacobson, N. 1985Basic Algebra . Freeman. John, F. 1941 The Dirichlet problem for a hyperbolic equation. Am. J. Math. 63, 141–154. Lindblom, L., Owen, B. & Morsink, S. 1998 Gravitational radiation instability in hot young neutron stars. Phys. Rev. Letters 80, 4843. London, S. & Shen, M. 1979 Free oscillation in a rotating spherical shell. Phys. Fluids 22, 2071–2080. Maas, L. 2000 Waves focusing and ensuing mean ﬂow due to symmetry brea king in rotating ﬂuids. submitted to J. Fluid Mech. pp. 1–12. Maas, L., Benielli, D., Sommeria, J. & Lam, F.-P. 1997 Observation of an internal wave attractor in a conﬁned, stably stratiﬁed ﬂuid. Nature 388, 557–561. Maas, L. & Lam, F.-P. 1995 Geometric focusing of internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 300, 1–41. Malkus, W. 1967 Hydromagnetic planetary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 793–802. Moore, D. & Saffman, P. 1969 The structure of free vertical shear layers in a rotatin g ﬂuid and the motion produced by a slowly rising body. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 264, 597–634. Papaloizou, J. & Pringle, J. 1978 Non-radial oscillations of rotating stars and the rele vance to the short-period oscillations of cataclysmic variables .Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 182, 423. Ralston, J. 1973 On stationary modes in inviscid rotating ﬂuids. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 44, 366–383. Rieutord, M. 1995 Inertial modes in the liquid core of the Earth. Phys. Earth Plan. Int. 91, 41–46. Rieutord, M. 2000a A note on inertial modes in the core of the Earth. Phys. Earth Plan. Int. 117, 63–70. Rieutord, M. 2000b Ekman layers and the damping of inertial r-modes in a sp herical shell: application to neutron stars. submitted to Astrophys. J. , astro-ph/0003171 . Rieutord, M., Georgeot, B. & Valdettaro, L. 2000 Waves attractors in rotating ﬂuids: a paradigm for ill-posed cauchy problems. submitted to Phys. Rev. Let. . Rieutord, M. & Noui, K. 1999 On the analogy between gravity modes and inertial modes in spherical geometry. Eur. Phys. J. B 9, 731–738. Rieutord, M. & Valdettaro, L. 1997 Inertial waves in a rotating spherical shell. J. Fluid Mech. 341, 77–99. Schaeffer, D. 1975 On the existence of discrete frequencies of oscillatio n in a rotating ﬂuid. Studies in Applied Math. 54, 269–274. Stewartson, K. 1971 On trapped oscillations of a rotating ﬂuid in a thin sphe rical shell. Tellus 23, 506–510. Stewartson, K. 1972a On trapped oscillations of a rotating ﬂuid in a thin sph erical shell II. Tellus 24, 283–287. Stewartson, K. 1972b On trapped oscillations in a slightly viscous rotatin g ﬂuid. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 749–761. Stewartson, K. & Rickard, J. 1969 Pathological oscillations of a rotating ﬂuid. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 759–773. Walton, I. 1975 On waves in a thin rotating spherical shell of slightly v iscous ﬂuid. Mathematika 22, 46–59. Wunsch, C. 1968 On the propagation of internal waves up a slope. Deep-Sea Research 15, 251–258.42 M. Rieutord, B. Georgeot and L. Valdettaro Zwillinger, D. 1992Handbook of diﬀerential equations . Academic Press.
arXiv:physics/0007008v1 [physics.acc-ph] 5 Jul 2000Prediction of Long Term Stability by Extrapolation G. Parzen June 2000 BNL C-A/AP/18Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The survival function, jtrns. 2 2.1 Rapid oscillations in the survival function . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Plateaus in the survival function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3 Extrapolation of the survival function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 Survival function along the ǫy0= 0direction 12 4 Survival function along ǫx0= 0direction 17 5 Extrapolation parameters for the plateau model 20 6 Conclusions 22 1Abstract This paper studies the possibility of using the survival fun ction, to predict long term stability by extrapolation. The survival functio n is a function of the initial coordinates and is the number of turns a particle will survive for a given set of initial coordinates. To determine the diﬃculti es in extrapolating the survival function, tracking studies were done to comput e the survival function. The survival function was found to have two proper ties that may cause diﬃculties in extrapolating the survival function. O ne is the existence of rapid oscillations, and the second is the existence of pla teaus. It was found that it appears possible to extrapolate the survival f unction to estimate long term stability by taking the two diﬃculties into accoun t. A model is proposed which pictures the survival function to be a seri es of plateaus with rapid oscillations superimposed on the plateaus. The t racking studies give results for the widths of these plateaus and for the sepe ration between adjacent plateaus which can be used to extrapolate and estim ate the location of plateaus that indicate survival for longer times than can be found by tracking.Chapter 1 Introduction This paper studies the possibility of using the survival fun ction, to predict long term stability by extrapolation [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. The survival func- tion is a function of the initial coordinates and is the numbe r of turns a particle will survive for a given set of initial coordinates . To determine the diﬃculties in extrapolating the survival function, tracki ng studies were done to compute the survival function. The survival function was found to have two properties that may cause diﬃculties in extrapolating t he survival turns function. One is the existence of rapid oscillations, and th e second is the existence of plateaus.It was found that it appears possible to extrapolate the survival function to estimate long term stability by taking the two diﬃculties into account. A model is proposed which pictures the survival function to b e a series of plateaus with rapid oscillations superimposed on the plate aus. The tracking studies give results for the widths of these plateaus and for the seperation between adjacent plateaus which can be used to extrapolate a nd estimate the location of plateaus that indicate survival for longer t imes than can be found by tracking. 1Chapter 2 The survival function, jtrns. For a given set of initial coordinate, x0, px0, y0, py0, one can ﬁnd by tracking the survival time in turns, which is the number of turns the pa rticle will survive before becoming unstable and which will be denoted b yjtrns. This determines the function jtrns(x0, px0, y0, py0) which will be called the survival function [8, 9, 10, 11]. If one limits the tracking to 1 .0 106turns or less, one can ﬁnd jtrnsfor those x0, px0, y0, py0for which jtrnsis less than or equal to 1.0 106. A tracking study was done of particle motion with no rf presen t, using an older version of the RHIC lattice. Random and systematic ﬁ eld error multipoles are present up to order 10. The particle momemtum isdp/p= 0. As the ﬁrst case studied, the initial coordinates x0, px0, y0, py0are chosen along the direction in phase space given by px0= 0, py0= 0 and ǫx0=ǫy0, where ǫx0, ǫy0are the linear emittances in the absence of the error multipo les. Along this direction in phase space , jtrnsmay be considered to be a function ofx0. For a given initial coordinate, x0, one can ﬁnd by tracking the survival time in turns, which is the number of turns the particle will s urvive before becoming unstable and will be denoted by jtrns. This determines the survival function [8, 9, 10, 11] jtrns(x0). If one limits the tracking to 1 106turns or less, one can ﬁnd jtrnsfor those x0for which jtrnsis less than or equal to 1 106. For dp/p= 0, it is assumed that on the closed orbit x= 0 and x0is also the initial betatron oscillation amplitude. The tracking was ﬁrst done using x0which are seperated by dx0=.1 mm. The results for jtrnsversus x0are shown in Fig. 2.1. The results in this ﬁgure may be looked at as the results of a search in x0starting at large x0 and decreasing x0in steps of dx0=.1mm. The ﬁgure shows an apparent 2CHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 3 1101001000100001000001e+061e+07 0.0150.0160.0170.0180.0190.020.0210.022j t r n s x0 (m)jtrns vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epx0=epy0 Figure 2.1: jtrnsversus x0.dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0=ǫy0direction, dx0=.1mm. In the ﬁgure, jtrns, x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent jtrns,x0,dx0 ,ǫx0,ǫy0. stability limit for 1e6 turns of usl=15.2 mm. 2.1 Rapid oscillations in the survival function Fig. 2.1 shows rapid oscillations in jtrnswithx0. Large changes in jtrns occur when x0changes by .1 mm. The oscillations extend over about .3 mm. Tracking studies show that the oscillations become more rapid when the search interval, dx0, is decreased. This is indicated in Fig. 2.2 where dx0 is decreased to .05 mm and in Fig. 2.3 where dx0is decreased to .025 mm. Results for diﬀerent search intervals, dx0, are shown in Table 2.1. dx0is decreased from .1mm to .0001 mm . The wavelength of the oscila tions , ∆ x0, as measured from the stability limit for 1e6 turns, usl, to the location of the ﬁrst peak in jtrnsdecreases from about .3 mm to .0002 mm. Also listed for each value of dx0are the apparent stability limit for 1e6 turns, usl, andjtrnsCHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 4 dx0(mm) ∆x0(mm) usl(mm) jtrnsatusl+dx0 .1 .3 15.2 100000 .01 .06 15.27 150000 .001 .003 15,270 82605 .0001 .0002 15.2793 60693 Table 2.1: Results for diﬀerent search intervals, dx0.dx0is decreased from .1mm to .0001 mm . ∆ x0is the wavelength of the oscilations , as measured from the stability limit for 1e6 turns, usl, to the location of the ﬁrst peak in jtrns. Also listed for each value of dx0are the apparent stability limit for 1e6 turns, usl, and jtrnsatusl+dx0. atusl+dx0. Table 2.1 shows that the wavelength of the oscilations , ∆ x0is roughly proportional to the size of the search interval, dx0. The value of jtrnsat usl+dx0shows that near usl,jtrnschanges appreciably in the small change inx0given by dx0. Tracking results show that this seems to hold even at extremely small dx0.The computed results appear to indicate that jtrns(x0) is not a continuous function of x0. For a continuous function of x0, one can ﬁnd a small enough interval in x0such that the diﬀernce between the values of the function for any two x0in that interval is very small. This does not appear to be true for jtrns(x0). The existence of the rapid oscillations in the survival func tion,jtrns(x0), would seem to make it diﬃcult to extrapolate to ﬁnd those x0that sur- vive for more than 1e6 turns. However one could view the survi val function shown in Fig. 2.1 as being made up of the rapid oscillations su perimposed on a smoother, more slowly varying function which could be us ed for the extrapolation. This is discussed further in section 2.3. 2.2 Plateaus in the survival function Looking at Fig. 2.1, one can make out plateaus in the survival function, jtrns(x0). The plateaus are regions where jtrnsoscillates rapidly around an almost constant value of jtrns. The plateaus can be seen somewhat more clearly if one reduces the search interval dx0, as shown in Fig. 2.2 where dx0 is decreased to dx0=.05mm. One can make out 4 plateaus located at about jtrns=1.5e5, 2e4, 3500, 400 turns. Possible plateaus with jtrnsless than 100CHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 5 1101001000100001000001e+061e+07 0.0150.0160.0170.0180.0190.020.0210.022j t r n s x0 (m)jtrns vs x0 , dx0=.05mm, epx0=epy0 --------------1.5e5 2.0e4------------------- ----------3.0e3 Figure 2.2: jtrnsversus x0.dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0=ǫy0direction, dx0=.05mm. In the ﬁgure, jtrns, x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent jtrns,x0,dx0 ,ǫx0,ǫy0. turns are being ignored. It will be seen that the width of the p lateaus do not depend on the search interval, dx0. This is also true of the location of the plateaus in jtrns. This is shown in Fig. 2.3 where dx0=.025 mm. The existence of the plateaus in the survival function, jtrns(x0), would seem to make it diﬃcult to extrapolate to ﬁnd those x0that survive for more than 1e6 turns. If one does the extrapolation using points wh ich are close to the stability limit for 1e6 turns, usl, one may get incorrect results as these points may lie on one of the plateaus. 2.3 Extrapolation of the survival function The data given above leads to a model of the survival functioo n, which pictures it as sequence of plateaus. Within the plateaus, jtrnsoscillates about some constant vaue of jtrnswhich will be called the level of the plateau. TheCHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 6 1101001000100001000001e+061e+07 0.0150.0160.0170.0180.0190.020.0210.022j t r n s x0 (m)jtrns vs x0 , dx0=.025mm, epx0=epy0 --------------1.5e5 2.0e4----------------------- ----------3.0e3 Figure 2.3: jtrnsversus x0.dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0=ǫy0direction, dx0=.025mm. In the ﬁgure, jtrns, x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent jtrns,x0, dx0,ǫx0,ǫy0. existence of the plateaus makes extrapolation of the surviv al function appear diﬃcult. The last plateau that was measured has a level of abo ut 1.5e5 turns and a width of about 1.2 mm. An interesting question is what is the level of the next plateau, at lower x0, after the last plateau that was measured. In the following this plateau will be referred to as the ’next pl ateau’. Some help with the extrapolation is also provided by plottin g 1/Log(jtrns) against x0as shown in Fig. 2.4, where the search interval is dx0=.1mm and points with jtrnsless than 400 turns are omitted. It will be seen below that the seperation between adjacent plateaus does not vary greatly when measured as the change in 1 /Log(jtrns). To help locate the ’next plateau’, long runs were done starti ng with x0=15.2mm, and decreasing x01n steps of .1mm. In order to detect the beginning of the ’next plateau’, the runs have to be long enou gh not to be confused by the rapid oscillations in jtrnsthat occur within each plateau. Runs of length 2e7 turns were chosen, and these runs take abou t 10 days forCHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 7 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4 0.0120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0180.0190.021/Log(j t r n s) x0 (m)1/Log(jtrns) vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epx0=epy0 ---------------1.5e52.0e4---------------------------------3.0e3 Figure 2.4: 1 /Log(jtrns) versus x0.dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0=ǫy0 direction, dx0=.1mm. In the ﬁgure, Log(jtrns), x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represe nt 1/Log(jtrns),x0,dx0,ǫx0,ǫy0. the RHIC lattice used. The results are shown in Fig. 2.5 . One sees from this ﬁgure tha t the ’next plateau’ appears to start at x0=15.3 mm and ends at about 14.0 mm, and has a level of about jtrns=15e6 turns and a width of 1.2mm . The previous plateau goes from 16.5mm to 15.2 mm and has a width of 1.3mm and a level of jtrns=1.5e5 turns. The width of the plateau is measured he re from the end of one plateau in x0 to the end of the adjacent plateau and i ncludes the transition region where the points move from one plateau to t he next. The width of the ’next plateau’ is diﬃcult to measure, as the adja cent plateau at still lower x0is estimated to have a level of 3e9 turns, and cannot be found by tracking. One can see that the width is larger than 1.2mm. T hex0at 14.0 mm survived more than 89.9e6 turns. The data given above for t he ’next plateau’ is somewhat in error but it seems better to use it tha n to throw away this information. The results are also shown as a 1 /Log(jtrns) versus x0plot in Fig. 2.6.CHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 8 1101001000100001000001e+061e+071e+08 0.0130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0180.0190.020.021j t r n s x0 (m)jtrns vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epx0=epy0 --------------15e6 --------------1.5e5 --------------2.0e4 ----------3.0e3 Figure 2.5: jtrnsversus x0including points with jtrnsup to 4e7. dp/p= 0, px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0=ǫy0direction, dx0=.1mm. In the ﬁgure, jtrns, x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent jtrns,x0,dx0,ǫx0,ǫy0. One can see three plateaus near the stability boundary at the levels of about jtrns= 15e6, 1.5e5,and 2e4 turns. The properties of the plat eaus are summa- rized in Table 2.2. The seperation between the plateaus in th e 1/Log(jtrns) plot are given by .054 and .039, so that the seperation betwee n the plateaus in the 1 /Log(jtrns) are not too diﬀerent. The widths of the plateaus that were measured were 1.2+, 1.3 and 1.7 mm. The plateau model will now be used to extrapolate and investi gate long term stability in RHIC. In RHIC, jtrns=1e9 turns coresponds to a survival plateau level, jtrns 15e6 1.5e5 2e4 plateau level,1 /Log(jtrns) .139 .193 .232 plateal seperation in 1 /Log(jtrns).054 .039 — plateau width, ∆ x0(mm) 1.2+ 1.3 1.7 Table 2.2: Plateau parameters for the epx0=epy0 direction.CHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 9 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4 0.0130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0180.0190.020.0211/Log(j t r n s) x0 (m)1/Log(jtrns) vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epx0=epy0 --------------15e6----------3.0e3 --------------2.0e4 -----------------1.5e5 Figure 2.6: 1 /Log(jtrns) versus x0showing the next plateau and the last mea- sureed plateau. dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0=ǫy0direction, dx0=.1mm. In the ﬁgure, 1/Log( jtrns), x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent 1 /Log(jtrns),x0, dx0,ǫx0,ǫy0. time of about 3.5 hours. The data given above will be used to ex trapolate to ﬁnd the plateau whose level is greater than or equal to jtrns=1e9 turns. This plateau will be called the 1e9 plateau. The existence of the plateaus indicates that there are limits on the accuracy one can hope t o achieve by extrapolation. The two parameters one needs to extrapolate the survival function are the plateau width and the plateau level seperat ion. One cannot be certain what these parameters will be at jtrnsof the order of 1e9 turns. However, one can use the data found for these two parameters a tjtrnsof the order of 1e6 turns , to make the best estimate for these parame ters at jtrns of the order of 1e9 turns. The plateau width and the plateau level seperation were stud ied for three diﬀerent cases coresponding to three diﬀerent directions i n phase space. The results are summarized in chapter 5. The widths of the platea us were found to be roughly constant when measured in terms of X0=[βx0(ǫx0+ǫy0)].5withCHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 10 00.050.10.150.20.250.3 0.0110.0120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0181/Log(j t r n s) x0 (m)1/Log(jtrns) vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epx0=epy0 direction --------------15e6 --------------3.3e9 --------------1.2e14--------------1.5e5 Figure 2.7: 1 /Log(jtrns) versus x0showing the plateaus found by extrap- olation, including the 1e9 plateau. dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0=ǫy0 direction, dx0=.1mm. In the ﬁgure, 1/Log( jtrns), x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent 1 /Log(jtrns),x0,dx0,ǫx0,ǫy0. an average value ∆ X0=2.00 mm. The plateau level seperation measured in 1/Log(jtrns) varied from .054 to .019 with an average value of .033. It is s ug- gested that in the extrapolation, the average value of these two parameters be used. For the case being considered here, it is assumed in t he extrap- olation that the plateau widths in x0will be 1.4 mm corresponding to the average value of ∆ X0=2.00 mm, and the plateau level seperation is .033 in 1/Log(jtrns). Note that in this case X0=1.414 x0 The results found using these assumptions are shown in Fig. 2 .7, where two new plateaus are shown that were found by extrapolation. The plateau just below the next plateau in x0 has the level of jtrns=3.3e9 turns and is the 1e9 plateau in this example. The 1e9 plateau goes from x0=13.9mm to x0=12.6mm. The aperture for 1e9 turns may be taken as about 13.9 mm, which may be compared to the 15.2 mm found using runs of 1e6 tur ns. This indicates a loss of about 1.3mm or about 9% due to the required survivalCHAPTER 2. THE SURVIVAL FUNCTION, JTRNS. 11 time of 1e9 turns. One may note that the level of the 1e9 platea u being 3.3e9 turns, one may expect that some of the x0on this plateau will not survive 1e9 turns due to the oscillations in jtrns that will occur on t his plateau.To be safer one could assume the aperture for 1e9 turns to be 12.6 mm, which is the beginning of the adjacent plateau with a level of 1.2e1 4 turns, giving a loss of 17%. The procedure used indicates that in this case the result is n ot sensi- tive to changes in the two assumptions made regarding the wid th and level seperation of the plateaus. If the plateau model continues t o hold for the extrapolated plateaus, and the width and level seperation r emain roughly 1.3 mm and .034 respectively, then the result for the apertur e for 1e9 turns will be about the same. The plateau model developed above avoids certain problems t hat arise in tracking studies. In trying to ﬁnd the aperture for the survi val time of 1e9 turns, the more usual approach is to try ﬁnd the x0such that all smaller x0 will survive for 1e9 turns. If while doing a tracking search s tarting from large x0, one ﬁnds a x0that survives for 1e9 turn, then one has to ask whether all smaller x0will survive for 1e9 turns. This is a diﬃcult question to answ er. It is even possible, that there are are always smaller x0that will not survive 1e9 turns, although these x0may become very scarce at smaller x0. In the plateau model, in trying to ﬁnd the aperture for the survival time of 1e9 turns, the approach is to try to ﬁnd the plateau whose level is greater than 1e9 turns. This is a better deﬁned target, and the expectatio n is that this plateau will indicate a region of x0where most x0will survive 1e9 turns.Chapter 3 Survival function along the ǫy0= 0direction 1101001000100001000001e+061e+07 0.0210.02150.0220.02250.0230.02350.0240.02450.025j t r n s x0 (m)jtrns vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epy0=0 Figure 3.1: jtrnsversus x0.dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫy0= 0 direction, dx0=.1mm. In the ﬁgure, jtrns, x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent jtrns,x0,dx0 ,ǫx0,ǫy0. 12CHAPTER 3. SURVIVAL FUNCTION ALONG THE ǫY0= 0DIRECTION 13 1101001000100001000001e+061e+07 0.0210.02150.0220.02250.0230.02350.0240.02450.025j t r n s x0 (m)jtrns vs x0 , dx0=.05 mm, epy0=0 .9e6-------------- 1e4------------- ------------2e3 Figure 3.2: jtrnsversus x0.dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫy0= 0 direction, dx0=.05mm. In the ﬁgure, jtrns, x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent jtrns,x0,dx0 ,ǫx0,ǫy0. The tracking results presented above were all done along the ǫx0=ǫy0 direction. Results will now be given for the y0= 0, py0= 0 or ǫy0= 0 direction. Tracking studies of other cases will test the con sistancy of the plateau model. The direction in the space of x0, px0, y0, py0is further deﬁned bypx0= 0. The particle motion is 4 dimensional because of the prese nce of skew multipoles. jtrnsmay then be considered to be a function of x0. Fig. 3.1 shows jtrnsas a function of x0as found with tracking runs of 1e6 turns. The apparent stability limit using 1e6 turns and dx0=.1mm is 22.0 mm. To make the plateaus more visible , one can reduce the sear ch interval dx0todx0=.05 mm. These results are shown in Fig. 3.2. One sees that the re are two plateaus in the region shown with jtrnsgreater than or equal to 1e4, whose levels are located at jtrns= .9e6 , and 1e4 turns .The oscillations on the plateau near the stability boundary, appear to be smalle r than those seen in the ǫx0=ǫy0case. Runs of about 2e7 turns were done to ﬁnd the shape of the ’next p lateau’CHAPTER 3. SURVIVAL FUNCTION ALONG THE ǫY0= 0DIRECTION 14 1101001000100001000001e+061e+071e+08 0.018 0.019 0.020.021 0.022 0.023 0.024j t r n s x0 (m)jtrns vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epy0=0 1.5e6------------------ 1e4-------------8e6-------------------- Figure 3.3: jtrnsversus x0including points with jtrnsup to 4e7. dp/p= 0, px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫy0= 0 direction, dx0=.1 mm with dx0=.05 mm at larger x0. In the ﬁgure, jtrns, x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent jtrns,x0,dx0,ǫx0,ǫy0. in the region where x0is less than or equal to 21.0 mm. Enough tracking runs were done to determine the beginning , and the level of the ’ne xt plateau’. The results are shown in Fig. 3.3. Including these longer run s , one sees that the ’next plateau’ begins at x0=21.0mm and the level of the ’n ext plateau’ is about jtrns=8e6 turns. Here, the begining of the plateau is the edge at larger x0and the end is the edge at lower x0. Th end of the ’next plateau’ is some what diﬃcult to determine, as the adjacent plateau at lower x0has a high level of about 1e9 turns. The end of the ’ next plateau’ w as taken to be atx0=19.0 mm. The adjacent plateau at higher x0 is at the level of 1 .5e6 turns and with the width of 1.8 mm. These two plateaus are sepe rated by .017 in 1 /Log(jtrns) which is smaller than the .054 found in the ǫx0=ǫy0case. The results are also shown as 1 /Log(jtrns) versus x0plot in Fig. 3.4. The data found for these two plateaus will be used to extrapol ate and ﬁnd the 1e9 plateau in this case. In the extrapolation, the re sults found in chapter 5 for the average plateau width and level seperation will be used. InCHAPTER 3. SURVIVAL FUNCTION ALONG THE ǫY0= 0DIRECTION 15 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4 0.018 0.019 0.020.021 0.022 0.023 0.0241/Log(j t r n s) x0 (m)1/Log(jtrns) vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epy0=0 1.5e6--------------------1e4------------- 8e6------------------------ Figure 3.4: 1 /Log(jtrns) versus x0.dp/p = 0, px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫy0= 0 direction, dx0=.1 mm. In the ﬁgure, Log( jtrns), x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent 1 /Log(jtrns),x0,dx0,ǫx0,ǫy0. this case, this leads to the assumptions that each plateau is 2.0mm wide and a plateau level seperation of .033 in 1 /Log(jtrns) will be used here. The results are shown in Fig. 3.5, where two extrapolated pla teaus are shown with the plateau levels 8.5e8, and 4.5e12 . The apertur e for 1e9 turns was taken to be 17.1mm, the beginning of the plateau with a lev el of 4.5e12 turns. 17.1 mm is to be compared with the aperture of 21.9 mm fo und with runs of 1e6 turns. A loss of 4.8 mm or 22%.CHAPTER 3. SURVIVAL FUNCTION ALONG THE ǫY0= 0DIRECTION 16 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4 0.0150.0160.0170.0180.0190.020.0210.0220.0231/Log(j t r n s) x0 (m)1/Log(jtrns) vs x0 , dx0=.1mm, epy0=0 1.5e6-----------------1e4-- 8e6------------------------ 8.5e8------------------------ ------------------------4.5e12 Figure 3.5: 1 /Log(jtrns) versus x0showing the plateaus found by extrap- olation, including the 1e9 plateau. dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0=ǫy0 direction, dx0=.1mm. In the ﬁgure, 1/Log( jtrns), x0 , dx0, epx0, epy0 represent 1 /Log(jtrns),x0,dx0,ǫx0,ǫy0.Chapter 4 Survival function along ǫx0= 0 direction 1101001000100001000001e+061e+071e+08 0.0210.0220.0230.0240.0250.0260.0270.0280.029j t r n s X0 (m)jtrns vs X0 , dX0=.1mm, epx0=0 ---------------------------1.5e7 --------------------1.7e6 --------------------4.0e3 Figure 4.1: jtrnsversus X0.X0= (βx0/βy0).5y0.dp/p = 0,x0=0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0= 0 direction, dx0=.1 mm and runs go up to 2e7 turns. In the ﬁgure, jtrns, X0 , dX0, epx0, epy0 represent jtrns,X0,dX0,ǫx0,ǫy0. 17CHAPTER 4. SURVIVAL FUNCTION ALONG ǫX0= 0DIRECTION 18 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4 0.022 0.023 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.027 0.0281/Log(j t r n s) X0 (m)1/Log(jtrns) vs X0 , dX0=.1mm, epx0=0 ----------------------1.5e7-------------------------1.7e64.0e3-------------------- Figure 4.2: 1 /Log(jtrns) versus X0.dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0= 0 direction, dX0=.1 mm. X0= (bex0/bey0).5y0. In the ﬁgure, 1/ Log( jtrns), X0 , dX0, epx0, epy0 represent 1 /Log(jtrns),X0,dX0,ǫx0,ǫy0. Results will now be given for the x0= 0, px0= 0 or ǫx0= 0 direction.In order to be able to compare results with those of the above two cases, jtrns will plotted against X0= (βx0/βy0).5y0. Fig. 4.1 shows jtrnsas a function ofX0as found with tracking runs of about 2e7 turns.The apparent s tability limit using 1e6 turns and dx0=.1mm is usl=24.9 mm. In Fig. 4.1 one can make out two plateaus with levels larger than 1e4 turns. The l evels of these two plateaus are at 1.7e6 turns and 1.5e7 turns. The end of the 1.5e7 plateau was taken as X0=21.4 mm. The results are also shown as a 1 /Log(jtrns) plot in Fig. 4.2. The data found for these two plateaus will be used to extrapol ate and ﬁnd the 1e9 plateau in this case. In the extrapolation, the re sults found in chapter 5 for the average plateau width and level seperation will be used. In this case, this leads to the assumptions that each plateau is 2.0 mm wide and a plateau level seperation of .033 in 1 /Log(jtrns) will be used here. The results are shown in Fig. 4.3, where two extrapolated pla teaus areCHAPTER 4. SURVIVAL FUNCTION ALONG ǫX0= 0DIRECTION 19 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4 0.0170.0180.0190.020.0210.0220.0230.0240.0250.0260.0271/Log(j t r n s) X0 (m)1/Log(jtrns) vs X0 , dX0=.1mm, epx0=0 ----------------------1.5e7 ----------------------3.3e9 ----------------------7.7e131.7e6-----------------4.0e3--------- Figure 4.3: 1 /Log(jtrns) versus X0.dp/p= 0,px0= 0, py0= 0, ǫx0= 0 direction, dX0=.1 mm, X0= (bex0/bey0).5y0, showing extrapolated plateaus. In the ﬁgure, 1/ Log( jtrns), X0 , dX0, epx0, epy0 represent 1 /Log(jtrns), X0,dX0,ǫx0,ǫy0. shown with the plateau levels 3.3e9, and 7.7e13 turns . Most o f the particles on the 3.3e9 plateau will be assumed to survive 1e9 turns, and the aperture for 1e9 turns is then 21.4mm. 21.4mm is to be compared with the aperture of 24.9 mm found with runs of 1e6 turns. A loss of 3.5 mm or 17%.Chapter 5 Extrapolation parameters for the plateau model direction in phase space ǫy0=ǫx0 ǫy0=0 ǫx0=0 plateau level, jtrns 15e6,1.5e5,2e4 8e6,1.5e6,1e4 1.8e7,1.7e6,4e3 plateau level, 1 /Log(jtrns) .139, .193, .232 .145, .162 .138,.160,.277 platea level seperation in 1 /Log(jtrns) .054, .039 .017 .022 average plateau seperation .033 in 1/Log(jtrns) plateau width, ∆ X0(mm) 1.70, 1.83, 2.38 2.0, 1.8 2.2+, 2.0 plateau width, ∆ X0/X0 .075,.051,.106 .095,.086 .092, .083 average plateau width, ∆ X0 2.00 mm Table 5.1: Plateau parameters for three directions in phase space. X0= (βx0(ǫx0+ǫy0)).5. The extrapolation depends on two parameters, the width of th e plateaus and the seperation between consecutive plateau levels as me asured in terms of 1/Log(jtrns). The behaviour of these two parameters was studied by do- ing tracking runs for 3 diﬀerent cases, corresponding to the three diﬀerent directions in phase space, ǫy0=0,ǫx0=ǫy0andǫx0=0. The two parameters were measured for these 3 cases using runs of about 2e7 turns. The results are summarized in Table 5.1. Altogether, 7 plateaus were fou nd and the two parameters for these 7 plateaus were measured. In Table 5.1 o ne sees that the plateau width, as measured as ∆ X0,X0= (βx0(ǫx0+ǫy0)).5, is relatively 20CHAPTER 5. EXTRAPOLATION PARAMETERS FOR THE PLATEAU MODEL 21 constant with an average value of ∆ X0=2.00 mm. The plateau level sepera- tion when measured in 1 /Log(jtrns) varies considerably with an average value of .033. Based on the above results, it is proposed that in extrapolat ing the sur- vival function, it is assumed that the extrapolated plateau widths are given by ∆X0=2.00 mm, and the plateau level seperations in 1 /Log(jtrns) are .033.Chapter 6 Conclusions Tracking studies lead to a model of the survival function, wh ich pictures it as sequence of plateaus. Within the plateaus, the survival t ime in turns, jtrns, oscillates about some constant vaue of jtrnswhich will be called the level of the plateau. Studying the survival function along d iﬀerent directions in phase space, using an older version of the RHIC lattice , on e ﬁnds that the width of the plateaus, ∆ X0,X0= (βx0(ǫx0+ǫy0)).5, remains roughly constant at about 2.00 mm. The seperation between the levels of adjacent plateaus has the same order of magnitude when measured in ter ms of the change in 1 /Log(jtrns), and has an average vaue of .033. Using, these results for the width of the plateaus and the seperation between plat eau levels, one can extrapolate to estimate the location of the plateaus tha t correspond to longer survival times than can be found by tracking. For the c ase treated, it was found that a required survival time of 1e9 turns reduced t he aperture by about 15% as compared to the aperture found by tracking using 1e6 turns. The plateau model also leads to new criteria to be used in trac king studies to ﬁnd the aperture for particles to survive a given number of turns. In the plateau model, one ﬁnds the ﬁrst plateau whose level is highe r than the given number of turns, in order to ﬁnd the aperture for the given num ber of turns. This is to be compared with often used method, where one does a search starting at large amplitudes until one ﬁnds an amplitude tha t survives the given number of turns. In the latter method one cannot be sure that a ﬁner search would not ﬁnd unstable runs at smaller amplitudes or h ow frequently these unstable runs will occur. In the plateau model, while t here may be unstable runs at smaller amplitudes, there is the assumptio n that they will not occur frequently. 22Bibliography [1] M. Giovannozzi, W. Scandale, and E. Todesco, PAC97, 1997 , p. 1445 [2] M. B¨ oge and F. Schmidt, PAC97, 1997, p. 1439 [3] M. B¨ oge, A. Faus-Golfe, J. Gareyte, H. Grote, J.P. Koutc houk, J.Miles, Q. Qing, T. Risselada, F. Schmidt, S. Weisz, PAC97, 1997, p.1 356 [4] M. Giovannozzi, W. Scandale, and E. Todesco, LHC Project Report 136, 1997 [5] M. Giovannozzi, W. Scandale, and E. Todesco, LHC Project Report 45, 1996 [6] E. Todesco, and M. Giovannozzi, Phys. Rev. E Vol. 53, No. 4 , 1996. p. 4067 [7] W. Scandale, and E. Todesco, EPAC98, 1998, p. 1333 [8] A. Chao, AIP Conf. Proc. 230, p.203, 1990 [9] Y. Yan, SSC 500, 1991 [10] F. Galluccio and F. Schmidt, EPAC92 , 1992, p.640 [11] M. B¨ oge, H. Grote, Q. Quin, and F. Schmidt, EPAC96 , 1996 , p.920 23
arXiv:physics/0007009v1 [physics.hist-ph] 5 Jul 2000A Review Essay: “Lise Meitner and the Dawn of the Nuclear Age”, by Patricia Rife Gary R. Goldstein∗ Department of Physics Tufts University Medford, MA 02155 USA February 2, 2008 Abstract The recently published book, “Lise Meitner and the Dawn of th e Nuclear Age”, by Patricia Rife (Boston: Birkh¨ auser, 1999) is reviewed in an essay for the lay audience. Meitner was a leading nuclea r physi- cist at the time that the nucleus was the most exciting fronti er of science. To establish her career, she had to overcome daunti ng preju- dices against women in science and academia. Being of Jewish origin in Germany in the 1930’s, she narrowly escaped certain disas ter. Meit- ner was a crucial participant in the discovery of nuclear ﬁss ion, yet did not share in the Nobel Prize that her collaborator, Otto H ahn, received in 1945. How these events came about, how they were i nter- twined with contemporary history and how they ﬁt into the evo lution of Meitner’s social conscience and her abhorrence of war are some of the fascinating subjects discussed in the book and reviewed in this essay. ∗To be published in Peace and Change: a Journal of Peace Resear ch (2000). Submitted 13 March 2000. 1Science has contributed immeasurably to the history and cha racter of the twentieth century. Advances in the fundamental underst anding of na- ture raced along at a mindboggling pace. The speedy applicat ions of those advances have led to everything from palm size computers and wireless tele- phones to microwave ovens and nuclear weapons. Consequentl y, one of the important extra-scientiﬁc questions for any scientist has become “To what extent are you responsible for the applications of your work ?” And con- comitantly, to what extent should the scientist use his or he r expertise and reputation to inﬂuence the social uses of their science. We n eed only think about the many innovations in military technology during th e two World Wars to realize how important these questions are. Even the m ost narrowly focused practitioner of “pure research” can be faced with th ese questions. Consider Albert Einstein, a paciﬁst, whose extraordinary i nsights into the nature of space and time ultimately made possible the buildi ng of the A- bomb, the most destructive single weapon ever used in war. He became an outspoken critic of American nuclear policy after the war, a nd was labeled a “fellow traveler” by some of the cold warriors. Lise Meitner, a contemporary of Einstein’s, was a remarkabl e nuclear physicist whose discovery of nuclear ﬁssion paved the way fo r the Manhattan project, although she was unaware of the project itself. She did not share in the credit for that discovery, in any case, having been pas sed up by the Nobel Prize committee, while her collaborator, Otto Hahn, d id receive the prize in 1945. How these circumstances came about, and how th ey ﬁt into the evolution of her social conscience and her abhorrence of war are some of the fascinating subjects discussed in the biography by Pa tricia Rife, “Lise Meitner and the Dawn of the Nuclear Age”, [1] here under revie w. Lise Meitner’s name was hardly known in recent times, until a n earlier biography by Ruth Lewin Sime [2] appeared in 1996 that remind ed readers – interested scientists, primarily – of her importance. Yet , in the aftermath of World War II, Meitner toured the US and was acclaimed “the M other of the A-bomb” in the popular press (a dubious honor that she shu nned). As that war and its memories have faded from public consciousne ss, so have the names in a long list of scientists and engineers whose wor k contributed to weapons research in general and the development of the nuc lear ﬁssion bomb in particular. Certainly, everyone recognizes Albert Einstein, whose role in the dawn of the nuclear age was crucial, although he to o had nothing to do with the work of bomb project. He is now Time Magazine’s “ Person 2of the Century” and a logo for consumer products. Ironically , even among the cognoscenti, contemporary scientists for whom Einstei n’s work is part of their life’s breath, Meitner’s essential role in nuclear research is hardly known. Nor are the details of her extraordinary life. Her dev otion to scientiﬁc discovery was realized amidst an interminable struggle aga inst misogyny, anti-Semitism, economic hardship and indiﬀerence. Patric ia Rife’s biography, which was begun 11 years earlier, further contributes to the understanding of the struggle and achievements of Lise Meitner. Some of the important milestones discussed by Rife are summa rized herein. Lise Meitner was born in 1878 of a middle class Jewish family in Vienna. Early on it was clear that she had special ability in s cience and mathematics, although it was very diﬃcult for a young woman t o obtain a suitable education. She persisted, struggled against an un sympathetic system and managed to be the ﬁrst woman ever admitted to the physics d epartment at the University of Vienna. Her subsequent career was excep tional. From her twenties through her sixties she pursued the most vexing and interesting puzzles in nuclear and quantum physics. And she unraveled ma ny of those puzzles in her research. The times and places in which Meitner lived and worked coinci ded with some of the century’s most important and terrifying events. She was among the ﬁrst women in Austria and then Germany to be allowed parti cipation in higher education, both as a student, a researcher and ﬁnally as a professor. At the time she completed her Ph.D. in Vienna, many of the new d iscoveries in microscopic physics were being made and discussed. The na ture of the quantum world was beginning to be explored, and it was becomi ng clear that the laws of physics were in need of radical change in orde r to account for the new phenomena. In 1907, already involved in studies o f radioactive material, Lise decided to move to Berlin where Max Planck was leading a group of young physicists and chemists in the ﬁrst forays int o the quantum world. Within a few years some of the leading proponents of th e new physics would be there - Einstein, von Baeyer, Franck, Hertz, Stern, von Laue. Lise soon began to collaborate with a young chemist whose interes ts were similar to hers, Otto Hahn, in a partnership that would last through m ost of her career. But for many years she was an unpaid participant in th e research at the newly constituted Kaiser Wihelm Institute for Chemis try, women not being allowed any oﬃcial status. Science is not advanced in a vacuum of course, and Rife ﬁlls in the his- 3torical context throughout. Although Meitner was incredib ly focused on her nuclear studies, she was forced to be aware of the powerful mi sogyny that dogged her most pointedly in the early part of her career, but continued in many forms throughout her life. The turmoil of war - World War I - and its sweep of scientiﬁc talent into weapon making or soldiering a midst injuries and death were a sobering experience. She eventually volunt eered, seem- ingly reluctantly, to aid the Austrian war eﬀort as a nurse on the frontlines. She was asked to use her expertise in x-ray properties to aid t he diagno- sis of severe battleﬁeld injuries and to train others in the ﬂ edgling medical technology. She worked to exhaustion. These war experiences did not turn her into an overt paciﬁst, however (in a letter to Hahn she complained about Einstein’s paciﬁsm bei ng out of touch with the reality of the war engulﬁng Europe), but left her dee ply skeptical about political motives for committing lives to furthering grandiose national- istic goals. She was very unhappy about her peers’ participa tion in research on poison gas, which was led by the distinguished chemist Fri tz Haber. Otto Hahn even took part in one of the raids that used gas on the Alli es’ troops, for which Meitner chastised him. In the midst of all this turm oil she longed for the peaceful pursuit of her research, and returned to Ber lin hoping for the insanity to “pass over”. It eventually did, but was replaced by the post-war deprivations that made everyday life a struggle. Rife empha sizes the point that Lise developed an expectation that in time political an d economic chaos would run their course. The best thing to do in the meantime wa s to focus on her work. One of the people she admired most in Berlin, Max Pla nck, who was also a friend and mentor, advocated the attitude of the sc ientiﬁc interna- tionalists, that science transcends politics and nations. It should be pursued for its own sake. Lise, following that philosophy, maintain ed the work of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry Radiological St udies group as the war came to an end and she continued on as the director of th e Physics Section. Her achievements multiplied and her reputation gr ew among the increasing number of scientists devoted to nuclear researc h. Meitner ﬁnally had been given an appointment, the ﬁrst for a w oman, in the University of Berlin physics department (a separate and more interna- tionally prestigious institution than the Kaiser Wilhelm I nstitute) in 1914, but not with a salary commensurate with her status. For many y ears she had been getting by with help from her family and a stipend for bei ng Planck’s assistant, while working at the Institute. Finally in 1916, at the age of 38, 4she was given a salary nearly equal to Hahn’s, having been his equal in re- sponsibilities for several years already. As the post-war y ears were succeeded by the Weimar Republic period, her research progressed unha mpered by the forces of political change. But those forces became overwhe lming with the collapse of the liberal Weimar government. The work on nuclear ﬁssion, for which Lise Meitner will be rem embered most, has a complicated history that is enmeshed with the hor rendous policies of Nazi Germany. Clearly presenting the history of the disco very and the ensuing establishment of priority, within the tumultuous e vents of the times, is a major achievement of the Rife biography. This slice of mo dern history sharply illustrates how inescapable were the tentacles of f ascism, even among the most distinguished scientists. And the permanent dislo cation of one individual’s hitherto exemplary and productive life is a mi crocosm of the disruptions of the time. What is fascinating from the perspe ctive of the history of science, is how inextricably connected are the de mands of politics and the military with the directions taken by scientiﬁc rese arch. Once ﬁssion was identiﬁed by Meitner and colleagues, an international r ace was underway to exploit its military potential. To summarize the intertw ined issues that Rife disentangles is diﬃcult, but essential for appreciati ng the complexity of the task Rife has undertaken. To set the stage, in 1933 Meitner’s professorship at the univ ersity was revoked by the Nazi directorship, to her great shock. Nevert heless, she man- aged to remain at her beloved Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Ch emistry for ﬁve more years during the continuing rise of the fascists and the imposition of their anti-Jewish laws. At the same time as the revocation, P lanck, Heisen- berg and von Laue nominated Meitner and Hahn for the Nobel Pri ze for their pioneering work in radiochemistry. These nomination s were repeated over many years. It was hoped that as a side beneﬁt, a Nobel Pri ze would ease the plight of the non-Aryan Meitner and legitimize her r emaining in her research position at the Institute, but to no avail for her. R elying naively on her experience during World War I, Lise tried to “hold center ”, continuing with her work, while political chaos and the deplorable atti tudes of many new colleagues (already by 1933 half of the institute staﬀ we re Nazi party members) began to engulf her and her colleagues. In protest t o the dismissal of Jews from the university, Hahn resigned his university po sition (but not his institute position, which was more signiﬁcant as the uni versity lapsed into fascist polemics). However, Planck withdrew from the fray a fter an initial 5protest to Hitler over the dismissal of Fritz Haber from the d irectorship of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry. Other scientis ts in Lise’s circle advised avoiding direct confrontation with the Nazis. Rife emphasizes that Otto Hahn’s choice of “compromise rather than righteous ind ignation”(p.124 in [1]) was symptomatic of many educated German’s unwilling ness to con- front the Nazi hierarchy. Rife next carefully reconstructs the chronology of the nucl ear research. While getting the facts straight, Rife is quite terse with th e important scien- tiﬁc developments. A more readable and conventional accoun t of the science, without the detailed chronology of Meitner’s contribution , can be found in the excellent book, “The Making of the Atomic Bomb”, by Rhode s [3]. The essentials follow. In 1934, in the midst of the very threatening political envir onment through- out Europe, Enrico Fermi and his research group in Rome initi ated a new line of nuclear investigations in which neutrons were used t o bombard a variety of diﬀerent nuclei and the byproducts of the interac tions were stud- ied. The transmutation of the elements was underway. Lise an d Otto Hahn resumed their collaboration after a hiatus of 12 years in ord er to combine their skills in pursuing this new and promising approach. Th eir “Berlin Group”, which added Fritz Strassmann, was immediately a maj or contribu- tor to the burgeoning research area, competing with Fermi’s group and the “Paris Group” of Irene Curie and colleagues, along with seve ral newly consti- tuted US teams. The early results of the Berlin group suggest ed to Meitner that “transuranic elements”, artiﬁcially created nuclei h eavier than the nat- urally occurring heaviest element uranium, were sometimes produced when neutrons hit heavy nuclei. By observing the beta radiation f rom the radioac- tive nuclear byproducts, Meitner was able to identify many o f those nuclei. Hahn and Strassmann, both chemists, did the chemical analys es of the same byproducts. But there were some puzzling discrepancies wit h the results of the Curie experiments. Thinking that they were observing tr ansuranic nu- clei, Meitner couldn’t accept that the French were ﬁnding a l ighter element, lanthanum, among the nuclei. Furthermore, issues of priori ty developed with Curie’s group concerning the transuranics. These were very exciting times for science. A new area of exploration, the physics of the nucleu s, was yielding new discoveries at a rapid rate and attracting considerable attention. Com- petition was keen; major discoveries were imminent. There a re few periods in the history of modern physics and chemistry that were as heat ed. Hahn and 6Meitner planned a series of experiments to probe further int o the byproducts that result when uranium is the bombarded nucleus. But these experiments were slowed and interrupted by the events of 1938, as Rife des cribes. The Anschluss, the German takeover of Austria in March 1938, put all Austrians under the German laws and Lise Meitner was classiﬁ ed as a Jew. Rife doesn’t note that Meitner had actually converted to Pro testantism in her 20’s (Sime discussed this in her book [2]), although this was irrelevant for the “racial” distinctions that the Nazis made. It was clear t o Meitner and her friends, inside and outside of Germany, that she had to le ave as soon as possible; “holding center” was no longer viable. Hahn’s eﬀo rts to allow her to maintain her position at the Institute were half-hearted and ineﬀectual. She was quite angry with him for not speaking out more forcefu lly on her behalf. The subsequent ﬁts and starts arranging Meitner’s escape co nstitute an adventure story that Rife tells well. In brief, Lise managed , with no proper exit visa, but with extraordinary help from the Dutch physic ists Coster and Fokker, to get to the Netherlands, where she remained a short time before go- ing to Bohr’s institute in Copenhagen and then Stockholm, Sw eden. Sweden oﬀered her a modest position in a newly constituted institut e for nuclear re- search. Unfortunately the head, Nobel Laureate Manne Siegb ahn, was never very interested in Meitner’s work and allowed her only quite inadequate facil- ities. The Sime book [2] is quite damning of Siegbahn’s possi ble motivation for so ignoring Lise’s research needs, while Rife puts more e mphasis on his preoccupation with building big machines. In any case, Meit ner’s research in Sweden was hampered by inadequate equipment and lack of as sistants. She was quite frustrated and probably quite depressed, miss ing her beloved physics research, the Berlin institute, colleagues, frien ds and even her native German language. So from July through September 1938 Meitner could do no resea rch, but Hahn and Strassmann continued the project in Berlin to de termine the byproducts from the bombardment of uranium by neutrons. Hah n frequently wrote to Meitner about their progress and asked for her advic e and interpre- tation. On Dec. 16 Hahn and Strassmann, by careful measureme nts, had convinced themselves that one of the byproducts was deﬁnite ly barium, an element of slightly more than half the mass of the uranium. Ha hn wrote Lise asking her to interpret this puzzling result, realizing tha t this could not be the signature of one of the transuranics. Reluctant to give u p the transuranic 7idea, Lise ﬁrst tried to ﬁnd some loophole in the results. Whi le letters were being exchanged, Hahn wrote the article about the work witho ut consulting Strassmann and without Meitner’s name as a co-author. In the meantime Lise spent the Christmas holiday period in western Sweden wi th friends and her nephew, the young, recently emigrated physicist Otto Fr isch. The two, aunt and nephew, pondered the meaning of the barium results a nd, during a walk in the forest, had a breakthrough in understanding. Fr isch recalled later that, in classic fashion, Lise sat down by a tree and sta rted doing rough calculations on a scrap of paper. They had realized that the b arium was appearing as a result of the uranium actually splitting into smaller nuclei after being struck by a neutron. And the amount of energy rele ased was just what Einstein’s famous formula, E = mc2, predicted. Fission was discovered! It is diﬃcult to imagine the emotional turmoil Meitner exper ienced in that short time from the urgent arrangements being made for h er escape from Germany in April 1938 to the quiet Christmas holiday in weste rn Sweden. She had been engaged in some of the most exciting research of h er career, while trying to keep the terrifying external situation for n on-Aryans away from consciousness. Then in March she was forced to confront the fact that her life was in grave danger. The time for legally obtaining a n exit visa had passed. The escape plans were fraught with dangerous unc ertainty. She survived the fearful anxiety of crossing the border to safet y, only to encounter further uncertainty about her livelihood in foreign lands. What distinguishes these emotional upheavals from so many other refugees’ expe riences is the wrenching removal from her life’s work, work that was on a thr eshold of momentous discovery. She then had to endure reading Hahn’s l etters about the continuation of that research, while she was unable to do any work herself - she was experimentally mute. But then, when she and Frisch e xplained the experimental results in terms of ﬁssion, a term they invente d, she was at the height of scientiﬁc creativity again. And at the age of 60, th is creative insight was quite remarkable. Nevertheless, Lise was again in the do ldrums after the holiday when she returned to the isolation of the primitive l ab she had been assembling in Stockholm. Surely she had to have been depress ed, as Rife surmises. A superhuman fortitude sustained her through the war years; she managed to do some interesting research in spite of the obsta cles. After Lise wrote Hahn about the physical meaning of the exper imental results, she and Frisch composed an article whose submissio n and publication were quite slow. Long before the article appeared in print a r emarkable set 8of circumstances, involving Niels Bohr, brought the news of ﬁssion to the US and a race to study the ﬁssion process was underway. Meitner w as out of the loop from then until the end of World War II. Her experiments c onducted in that period were no longer at the cutting edge. The real dev elopments of nuclear ﬁssion became part of the secret rush to build a nucle ar bomb by the US, Germany and later, the Soviet Union. There are many questions raised by this history of ﬁssion’s d iscovery. Why was Meitner not included as a co-author on Hahn and Strass mann’s paper? Rife doesn’t consider this point, but the fact that Me itner had been an active partner in this particular research until her esca pe in July reason- ably should have led to her inclusion on the paper. Sime’s boo k [2] speculated that it might have been dangerous for Hahn to include this rec ently escaped non-Aryan as a co-author. Most of the scientists involved in this line of re- search knew that Meitner had been an equal partner in the work anyway. Unfortunately, though, after the war Hahn continued to down play Meitner’s role in the research as Rife shows. During the war “He refused to take a stand on the politics in and out of his institute: the Third Re ich was blind- ing Hahn and he began to discount Meitner’s insights and cont ributions he had frantically sought out months earlier. We witness here a ppeasement, professional cowardice, and worse.” (p.213). Perhaps Hahn ’s initial lapse is understandable given that the groundbreaking paper may hav e been rejected by the editor or some other authorities for political reason s, although Hahn knew the editor personally. More likely, he would have had to stand up to the Nazi directorship of the Institute and the oﬃcial scient iﬁc establishment, thereby jeopardizing his position. And when he ﬁnally recei ved recognition for the paper and the acclaim from his German colleagues that followed, he was not about to share credit with Meitner. There is no questi on that his be- havior was scurrilous. He must have constructed a torturous self-justiﬁcation to assuage his guilt for deserting his decades long collabor ator and friend. He never adequately acknowledged her essential role in the dis covery, even long after he was awarded the Nobel Prize and was a leading ﬁgure in post-war German science. Another important element of the discovery of nuclear ﬁssio n, for histo- rians of science, is how Meitner and Hahn were able to accept t he error in their previous thinking about their transmutation researc h. Rife notes that both shared an initial unwillingness to abandon their inter pretation of their previous neutron bombardment work. Here was an archetypal s truggle at the 9beginning of a paradigm shift [4] or creative leap. Hahn rema ined unsure of his experimental results for a while, but once Meitner, with Frisch, realized they had seen ﬁssion in the data, everything fell into place. The war years were diﬃcult for Meitner for many reasons. The n ews of horrendous destruction and turmoil was depressing. She h elped friends ﬂeeing Nazi persecution. She kept in touch with family and wa s able to com- municate with some of her Berlin colleagues, but must have fe lt quite helpless in the sweep of events. Her nephew Frisch had managed to get a p osition in Birmingham, England and was continuing to experiment wit h ﬁssion. In collaboration with another German-Jewish mmigrant, Rudol ph Peierls, he ﬁgured out how the ﬁssion of a rare isotope of uranium (U235) c ould be used to initiate a “chain reaction” and create a “super bomb” of en ormous power. The secret Frisch-Peierls memorandum [5] became the impetu s for the start of the Manhattan Project. Unbeknownst to Lise, her nephew, P eierls and other physicists working in Britain (including Klaus Fuchs ) were sent oﬀ to Los Alamos, New Mexico to contribute to the making of the bomb . Had she been given the opportunity to participate in that war work, t here is little doubt that Meitner would have declined, as her previous hist ory suggests. In a separate discussion, Rife makes the interesting point t hat the scale of scientiﬁc research would never be the same after the “big sci ence” projects became the rule with the infusion of large government budget s into scien- tiﬁcally innovative weapons development. Siegbahn’s inst itute in Stockholm had become an example of big science that left Meitner out in t he cold (al- though not directed toward weapons work). When the war in Europe ended, Meitner was horriﬁed to learn ab out the deaths and deprivations of the millions of victims of the Naz i concentration camps. She could not forgive her German colleagues for their lack of active opposition to the regime. Rife quotes a remarkable letter to Hahn (that he never received) in which Meitner excoriates her old friend a nd research part- ner: “All of you lost your standards of justice and fairness. ... All of you also worked for Nazi Germany, and never even attempted passi ve resistance. Of course, to save your troubled conscience, you occasional ly helped an op- pressed person; still, you let millions of innocent people b e murdered, and there was never a sound of protest.”(p.249). Later she singl es out Heisenberg, “They should force a man like Heisenberg, and millions of oth ers with him, to see these camps and the tortured people.”(p.250). Heisen berg had come to Bohr’s institute in Copenhagen in 1941 and had delivered a lecture full of 10propaganda for the regime that had infuriated Meitner. If th ere remain any doubts about Heisenberg’s lack of scruples about his leadin g Nazi nuclear bomb research, Lise would not have shared them. Bohr’s eﬀorts to assure the establishment of Lise’s priorit y for the inter- pretation of ﬁssion were not signiﬁcant enough to prevent th e 1944 Nobel Prize in Chemistry from being awarded (in 1945, after the War ) to Otto Hahn exclusively for the discovery of nuclear ﬁssion. “Lise Meitner keenly felt the injustice of the situation, as did many of her collea gues”, Rife re- counts (p.258). In his Nobel address to the Royal Academy of S ciences, with Lise present, Hahn gives credit to Meitner and Frisch for int erpreting his and Strassmann’s results. Nevertheless, Hahn did not, in tu rn, nominate her for the prize once he was on the nominating committee. He gave her part of the monetary award, though, which she then sent on to an Eme rgency Committee of Atomic Scientists chaired by Einstein in Princ eton. At war’s end Lise received unexpected attention from the pre ss. She was sought out after the atomic bombing of Japan. Called the “mot her of the A-bomb”, she quite forcefully tried to make it clear that she was completely removed from any weapon research. Rife quotes a friend of her s who recalls that when Lise ﬁrst heard about Hiroshima, there were “tears - shock - and then silence”(p.252). With the attention came some welcome invitations for her to visit the US. She was asked to give lectures at Catholic University in Washington, DC, and was a guest of honor at the Women’s Nation al Press Club. She traveled to many universities giving lectures and being honored. She spoke more and more about the importance of encouraging w omen to enter higher education and scientiﬁc research. She also fou nd herself among a growing number of scientists who were profoundly worried ab out the nuclear Pandora’s box that had been opened. Just days after the bombing of Hiroshima, Lise Meitner took p art in a radio interview conducted by Eleanor Roosevelt in which she said: “Women have a great responsibility and they are obliged to try, so fa r as they can, to prevent another war. I hope that the construction of the at om bomb not only will help to ﬁnish this awful war, but that we will be able to also use this great energy that has been released for peaceful work.” (p.253). Here she is expressing the attitudes that deﬁned the early post-w ar anti-nuclear movement among the atomic scientists. It has to be said that h istory shows, however, that it is doubtful that the atom bomb helped to ﬁnis h the war or made it less awful [3]. And the hope that atomic energy should be harnessed 11for peaceful work has been quixotic, due to the enduring safe ty problems of nuclear reactors. Nonetheless, her words were quite courag eous at that time. The plea to women is certainly heartfelt, given her own histo ry. Lise felt that even she had abdicated her moral responsibility by stay ing in Germany as long as she had, in spite of the personal danger, because he r work gave legitimacy to the regime. She urged women and scientists to b e more aware of the moral consequences of events around them. Meitner spent the post-war years traveling, giving lecture s, advocating arms control and the equal participation of women in science . She wanted to share the lessons that she learned in a lifetime of struggle a gainst the ravages of war and the prejudices toward women and Jews. She lived an a ctive and dedicated life to the age of 89. Although Rife gives us a thorough accounting of the facts of M eitner’s life, and indicates the concerns she had for family and friends thr oughout, there is a missing personal connection. For most of Lise’s years sh e lived alone, but enjoyed the company of friends. Did she consciously deci de to have no intimate romantic relationships? Did the battle to be accep ted in a man’s world preclude forming such attachments? Or have the biogra phers missed something? Did physics and her recreations - listening to mu sic and walking - ﬁll her time? We can only infer that she was depressed at part icular times when circumstances were quite diﬃcult. What is the core of he r personality? Lise was modest and very shy in public, yet unstoppably compe titive and tenacious in her work. She published papers at a high rate, ev en by today’s standards (when the competition for jobs and advancement is unpleasantly keen). Was this her strategy to overcome the prejudices agai nst women in science? Eventually, with all of her achievements, she was a ccepted by the mostly male community of nuclear scientists. Though she was never given the same level of recognition and reward as her collaborator Hah n, Lise Meitner’s single-minded dedication to physics while faced with a myri ad of obstacles is proof of an extraordinary person. And with such extraordi nary people we want to know how they came to be. We are ultimately left to theo rize for ourselves, but Rife has given us much of the data we need in a we ll written, thorough, readable and engrossing work. The book is clearly a paean to a great woman scientist. 12References [1] Patricia Rife,“Lise Meitner and the Dawn of the Nuclear A ge”, Birkh¨ auser, Boston 1999. [2] Ruth Lewin Sime, “Lise Meitner: a Life in Physics”, Unive rsity of Cal- ifornia Press, Berkeley 1996. [3] Richard Rhodes, “The Making of the Atomic Bomb”, Simon an d Schus- ter, New York 1995. [4] Thomas S. Kuhn, “The Structure of Scientiﬁc Revolutions ”, 3rd edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1996. [5] Otto Robert Frisch and Rudolph Peierls, “The Frisch-Pei erls Memoran- dum”, inRobert C. Williams and Philip L. Cantelon, editors, “The American Atom”, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philade lphia 1984. 13
arXiv:physics/0007010v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 5 Jul 2000Slow inviscid ﬂows of a compressible ﬂuid in spatially inhom ogeneous systems V.P. Ruban∗ Optics and Fluid Dynamics Department, Risø National Labora tory, DK-4000 Roskilde Denmark and L.D.Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, 2 Kosygin st r., 117334 Moscow, Russia An ideal compressible ﬂuid is considered, with the equi- librium density being a given function of coordinates due to the presence of some static external forces. The slow ﬂows in such system, which don’t disturb the density, are investiga ted with the help of the Hamiltonian formalism. The equations of motion of the system are derived for an arbitrary given topol - ogy of the vorticity ﬁeld. The general form of the Lagrangian for frozen-in vortex lines is established. The local induct ion approximation for the motion of slender vortex ﬁlaments in several inhomogeneous systems is studied. PACS: 47.15.Ki, 47.32.Cc, 47.37.+q, 47.65.+a I. PRELIMINARY REMARKS The hydrodynamic-type systems of equations are ex- tensively employed for macroscopic description of phys- ical phenomena in ordinary and superﬂuid liquids, in gases, in plasma, in other substances. In solving hy- drodynamic problems, it is admissible in many cases to neglect all dissipative processes and use the ideal ﬂuid approximation, at least as the ﬁrst step. With this ap- proximation. a dynamic model describing ﬂow is conser- vative. The Hamiltonian formalism is a convenient tool to deal with such systems [1], [2], which makes possible to classify in a universal way all the nonlinear processes. A big number of works is devoted to application of the Hamiltonian method in hydrodynamics (see, for instance, the review [3] and references therein). One of the most important questions, permitted for a universal consideration in the frame of Hamiltonian formalism, is the question about integrals of motion of a dynamic system. Accordingly to the Noether’s the- orem the conservation laws are closely connected with the symmetry of the Lagrangian with respect to some one-parametric group of transformations of the dynam- ical variables. It is well known that the conservation laws for the energy, for the momentum, and for the an- gular momentum follow from the fundamental properties of the space and time, namely from homogeneity of the time and from homogeneity and isotropy of the space. Due to these properties, shifts and turns of the system do not change its Lagrangian. The characteristic feature of the hydrodynamic-type systems is that they possess, besides the indicated usual integrals of motion, an inﬁnite number of the speciﬁc in- tegrals of motion – for instance, in isentropic ﬂows thecirculation of the canonical momentum along any frozen- in closed contour is conserved. In usual non-relativistic hydrodynamics, where the canonical momentum coin- cides with velocity, the given statement is known as the Kelvin’s theorem about conservation of the velocity cir- culation [4]. From the viewpoint of the Lagrangian formalism, the conservation of these quantities is due to the special sym- metry of the equations of ideal hydrodynamics [5]- [8]. In the Lagrangian description each ﬂuid particle is labeled by a three-dimensional vector a. The dynamics of the ﬂuid is determined by indicating the positions x(a, t) of each ﬂuid particle at an arbitrary moment in time t. The equations of motion for mapping r=x(a, t) follow from the variational principle δ/integraldisplay L{x(a, t),˙x(a, t)}dt= 0. The Lagrangian Lof the isentropic ﬂuid admits an in- ﬁnitely parametric symmetry group – it assumes the same value on all mappings x(a, t) for which the Eu- lerian characteristics of the ﬂow are the same – the den- sityρ(r, t) = det \|\|∂a(r, t)/∂r\|\|and the velocity v(r, t) = ˙x(a(r, t), t). Such mappings diﬀer from one another only by a relabeling of the Lagrangian labels a, which is why the symmetry group is called the relabeling group. All conservation laws for the vorticity are a consequence of this symmetry of the Lagrangian with respect to rela- beling of the labels (according the Noether’s theorem). The most general formulation of these laws postulates the existence of a local vector Lagrangian invariants – the Cauchy invariant [9]. The very important characteristics of a Hamiltonian system exists, namely the ﬁeld of the canonical momen- tump(r, t), which is deﬁned as follows (see for details the paper [10]) p(r, t)≡δL δ˙x(a(r, t))=1 ρ/parenleftbiggδL{ρ,v} δv/parenrightbigg . (1) It should be emphasized that in general case (for in- stance, in relativistic hydrodynamics or in presence of the magnetic ﬁeld) the canonical momentum pdoes not coincide with the velocity v. The equality p=vtakes place only in the simplest models with a quadratic on v Lagrangians like in ordinary Eulerian hydrodynamics LE=/integraldisplay/parenleftbigg ρv2 2−ε(ρ)−ρU(r)/parenrightbigg d3r, (2) 1where ε(ρ) is the internal energy density, U(r) is the ex- ternal force potential, for instance, the gravitational po - tential. On the level of Eulerian description of ﬂows, the exis- tence of the Cauchy invariant is attested by the frozen- ness equation for the vorticity Ωwhich is deﬁned as the curl of the canonical momentum ﬁeld Ω(r, t) = curl p(r, t). (3) The dynamics of Ωfollows from the variational Euler- Lagrange equation for the mapping x(a, t). This equa- tion takes the next form, being rewritten in terms of the density and velocity ﬁelds (see [10] for details) (∂t+v· ∇)/parenleftbigg1 ρ·δL δv/parenrightbigg =∇/parenleftbiggδL δρ/parenrightbigg −1 ρ/parenleftbiggδL δvm/parenrightbigg ∇vm, (4) and it completely determines the dynamics of the system, together with the continuity equation ρt+∇(ρv) = 0 (5) It is easy to check that application of the curl-operator to the equation (4) gives Ωt= curl[ v×Ω]. (6) The formal solution of the last equation is Ω(r, t) =(Ω0(a)∇a)x(a, t) det/ba∇dbl∂x(a, t)/∂a/ba∇dbl/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle a=x−1(r,t)= =/integraldisplay δ(r−x(a, t))(Ω0(a)∇a)x(a, t)d3a, (7) with the solenoidal independent on time ﬁeld Ω0(a) being exactly the Cauchy invariant. The equation (7) displays that the lines of the initial solenoidal ﬁeld Ω0(a) are de- formed in the course of motion by the mapping x(a, t), keeping all the topological characteristics unchanged [11 ]. This property of the vortex lines motion is called the frozenness. The presence of an inﬁnite number of integrals of mo- tion inﬂuences strongly the dynamical and statical prop- erties of the liquid systems. This is the reason why the clariﬁcation of the structure of conservation laws, as well as the search for such new parameterizations of the dy- namical variables, which take into account the integrals of motion more completely, are very important. In many cases, when a level of dissipation is low, it is still correct to speak about the integrals of the corresponding con- servative problem, because the values of some of them are conserved with a high accuracy, especially on the initial stage of the evolution, while the system has not proceeded to a state where the role of the dissipation is signiﬁcant due to large gradients. Besides this, theconservation laws in the physical systems, as a rule, are associated with deﬁnite geometrical objects. The use of these associations promotes the understanding and vivid imagination of everything what happens. In hydrody- namic models, the frozen-in vortex lines are such geo- metrical objects, so the present work is devoted to the study of their motion in the spatially non-homogeneous systems. Hydrodynamical equations of motion describe, in par- ticular, an interaction between ”soft” degrees of freedom of the system – the vortices, and ”hard” degrees of free- dom – the sound. In the limit of slow ﬂows, when a typical velocity of vortex structures motion is small in comparison with the sound speed, the dynamic regime is possible, in which the hard degrees of freedom corre- sponding to deviations of the density ρ(r, t) from its equi- librium conﬁguration ρ0(r), are excited weakly. Then, with complete neglecting the sound, in the homogeneous caseρ0=const one arrives at the models of incompress- ible ﬂuid. For dynamics of vortices in incompressible perfect ﬂuid, the so called formalism of vortex lines has been developed recently [12], [13], [10], [14], which takes into account the conservation of topology of the vorticity ﬁeld. Application of this formalism allows everyone to deal with the partially integrated system, where the topol- ogy is ﬁxed by the Cauchy invariant. It should be noted that actually this formalism is used in hydrodynamics and the theory of super-ﬂuidity for a rather long time in description of localized vortex structures – point vortice s on the plane (see, for instance, [15], [16], [17] and refer- ences therein), and for inﬁnitely thin vortex ﬁlaments in the 3D space [18], [19]. As known, one of the diﬃculties in work with such singular objects is the problem of regular- ization of divergences in expressions for certain physical quantities, which is especially critical in the 3D case. In the works [12], [13], [10], [14] the route is traced how to take into account the most important degrees of freedom in the analysis of these 3D structures, avoiding the in- ﬁnities in the expressions for the physical quantities. In the new description the frozen-in solenoidal ﬁeld is con- sidered as the continuous distribution of the elementary objects – vortex lines. It is important that in the incom- pressible ﬂuid the dynamics of these objects is autonomic and essentially transverse, i.e. the distribution of the La - grangian particles along vortex lines doesn’t inﬂuence the corresponding equation of motion of the lines themselves. Such an approach has allowed also to construct a set of integrable hydrodynamic models, diﬀerent from Eulerian hydrodynamics, which exhibit the ﬁnite time singularity developing from smooth initial data [14]. Such models can help in understanding the collapse problem in ideal hydrodynamics. The goal of the present work is to extend the vortex line formalism to the case when the equilibrium density ρ0(r) is a ﬁxed non-trivial function of spatial coordinates 2due to the static inﬂuence of some external forces. For examples, it can be the gravitational force for a large mass of an isentropic gas, both in usual and in relativis- tic hydrodynamics, or it can be the condition of electrical neutrality for the electron ﬂuid on the given background of ion distribution in the model of the electron magne- tohydrodynamics (EMHD). The theory developed here can be also applied to the tasks about long-scale dynam- ics of the quantized vortex ﬁlaments in the Bose-Einstein condensate placed into a trap of a suﬃciently large size. II. HAMILTONIAN DYNAMICS OF VORTEX LINES So, let the dynamics of the system is speciﬁed by some Hamilton’s functional H{ρ,p} H=/integraldisplay/parenleftBigδL δv·v/parenrightBig d3r− L, (8) where the velocity vis expressed through the momen- tumpand the density ρwith the help of (1). Let’s note that the velocity ﬁeld can be expressed through the vari- ational derivative of the Hamiltonian with respect to the canonical momentum by the formula v=1 ρ/parenleftbiggδH δp/parenrightbigg , (9) which is analogous to the formula (1). The Hamiltonian (non-canonical) equations of motion for the ﬁelds of den- sity and momentum follow from (5) and (4). With taking into account the equality (9) they have the form (for de- tailed derivation see [10]) ρt+∇/parenleftbiggδH δp/parenrightbigg = 0, (10) pt=/bracketleftbigg/parenleftbiggδH δp/parenrightbigg ×curlp ρ/bracketrightbigg − ∇/parenleftbiggδH δρ/parenrightbigg . (11) Note, that the ﬁrst equation in this system is nothing else but the continuity equation. In the regime under consideration, which corresponds formally to the ”prohibition” of the sound degrees of free- dom, the ﬂow of the ﬂuid occurs in such a way that the density of each moving portion of ﬂuid follows the given function ρ0(r), which doesn’t depend on time. Therefore the equation (10) gives the condition ∇/parenleftbiggδH δp/parenrightbigg = 0, (12) which means that after imposing the constrain ρ=ρ0(r) the Hamiltonian does not depend anymore on the po- tential component of the canonical momentum ﬁeld, itdepends now only on the solenoidal component, actually on the vorticity Ω. The condition (12) implies the valid- ity of the formula δH δp= curl/parenleftbiggδH δΩ/parenrightbigg , (13) so the next equation for the vorticity dynamics follows from (11) Ωt= curl/bracketleftbigg curl/parenleftbiggδH δΩ/parenrightbigg ×Ω ρ0(r)/bracketrightbigg (14) This equation diﬀers only by presence of the function ρ0(r) (instead of the unity) from the equation used in the works [13] and [14] as the start point in the tran- sition to the vortex line representation in homogeneous systems. Therefore all the further constructions will be done similarly to Ref. [14]. First, let us ﬁx the topology of the vorticity ﬁeld by means of the formula Ω(r, t) =/integraldisplay δ(r−R(a, t))(Ω0(a)∇a)R(a, t)da= =(Ω0(a)∇a)R(a, t) det/ba∇dbl∂R/∂a/ba∇dbl/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle a=R−1(r,t)(15) where Ω0(a) is the Cauchy invariant, and the vector T(a, t) = (Ω0(a)∇a)R(a, t) (16) is directed along the vorticity ﬁeld at the point r= R(a, t). It is necessary to stress that the information supplied by the mapping R(a, t) is not so full as the in- formation supplied by the purely Lagrangian mapping x(a, t). The role of the mapping R(a, t) is exhausted by a continuous deformation of the vortex lines of the initial ﬁeldΩ0. This means that the Jacobian J= det/ba∇dbl∂R/∂a/ba∇dbl (17) is not related directly to the density ρ0(r), inasmuch as, as against the mapping x(a, t), the new mapping R(a, t) is deﬁned up to an arbitrary non-uniform shift along the vortex lines. The geometrical meaning of the representation (15) becomes more clear if instead of a we will use the so called vortex line coordinate sys- tem (ν1(a), ν2(a), ξ(a)), so the 2D Lagrangian coordinate ν= (ν1, ν2)∈ Nis the label of vortex lines, which lies in some manifold N, while the longitudinal coordinate ξ parameterizes the vortex line. Locally, vortex line coordi - nate system exists for arbitrary topology of the vorticity ﬁeld, but globally – only in the case when all the lines are closed. In the last case the equation (15) can be rewritten in the simple form Ω(r, t) =/integraldisplay Nd2ν/contintegraldisplay δ(r−R(ν, ξ, t))Rξdξ. (18) 3The geometrical meaning of this formula is evident – the frozen-in vorticity ﬁeld is presented as the continuous dis - tribution of vortex lines. It is also clear that the choice of the longitudinal parameter is non-unique. This choice is determined exclusively by convenience of use in a par- ticular task. The use of the formula Ωt(r, t) = curl r/integraldisplay δ(r−R(a, t))[Rt(a, t)×T(a, t)]da, (19) which follows immediately from Eq.(15), together with the general relationship between variational derivatives of an arbitrary functional F{Ω} /bracketleftbigg T×curl/parenleftbiggδF δΩ(R)/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg =δF δR(a)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle Ω0(20) allow to obtain the equation of motion for the mapping R(a, t) by substitution of the representation (15) into the equation (14). So the dynamics of the mapping R(a, t) is determined by the equation [(Ω0(a)∇a)R(a)×Rt(a)]ρ0(r) =δH{Ω{R}} δR(a)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle Ω0.(21) It is non diﬃcult to check by the direct calculation that the given equation of motion follows from the variational principle δ/integraltext LΩ0dt= 0, where the Lagrangian is LΩ0=/integraldisplay/parenleftBig [Rt(a)×D(R(a))]·(Ω0(a)∇a)R(a)/parenrightBig da − H{Ω{R}}, (22) with the vector function D(R) being related to the den- sityρ0(r) by the equality (∇R·D(R)) =ρ0(R). (23) It should be stressed that conservation in time of the ﬂuid amount inside each closed frozen-in vortex surface is not imposed a priori as a constrain for the mapping R(a, t). All such quantities are conserved in the dynam- ical sense due to the symmetry of the Lagrangian (22) with respect to the group of relabelings of the labels νof vortex lines ν=ν(˜ν, t),∂(ν1, ν2) ∂(˜ν1,˜ν2)= 1. (24) Considering all the one-parametrical sub-groups of the given group of area-preserving transformations and ap- plying the Noether’s theorem to the Lagrangian (22) rewritten in terms of vortex lines LN=/integraldisplay Nd2ν/contintegraldisplay/parenleftBig [Rt(ν, ξ)×D(R(ν, ξ))]·Rξ(ν, ξ)/parenrightBig dξ− H{Ω{R}}, (25) it is possible to obtain the indicated integrals of motion in the next form (compare with Ref. [20]) IΨ=/integraldisplay NΨ(ν1, ν2)d2ν/contintegraldisplay ρ0(R)([R1×R2]·Rξ)dξ(26) where Ψ( ν1, ν2) is an arbitrary function on the manifold Nof labels, with the only condition Ψ \|∂N= 0. III. THE LOCAL INDUCTION APPROXIMATION When solving a particular task, the necessity always arises in making some simpliﬁcations. The variational formulation for the dynamics of vortex lines allows to in- troduce and control various approximations on the level of the Lagrangian (25), what in practice is more conve- nient and more simple then the control of the approxima- tions made on the level of equations of motion. For exam- ple we will consider now the so called local induction ap- proximation (LIA) in dynamics of a slender non-stretched vortex ﬁlament. In spatially homogeneous systems LIA leads to the integrable equation of motion, which is gauge equivalent to the nonlinear Schroedinger equation [21]. At ﬁrst, we will consider the Eulerian hydrodynamics, where the canonical momentum and the velocity coin- cide. Let the vorticity be concentrated in a quasi-one- dimensional structure like vortex ﬁlament, with a typical longitudinal scale Lbeing much larger then the width d of the ﬁlament. A typical scale of spatial inhomogeneity is supposed to be of order of Lor larger. In such situa- tion the kinetic energy of the ﬂuid is concentrated in the vicinity of the ﬁlament, with the corresponding integral being logarithmically large on the parameter L/d. The LIA consist in the following simpliﬁcations. First, in the kinetic part of the Lagrangian (25), the dependence of the shape of vortex lines on the label νis neglected, i.e. the ﬁlament is considered as a single curve R(ξ, t). Af- ter integration over d2νthe constant multiplier Γ appears now, which is the value of velocity circulation around the ﬁlament. Second, instead of derivation of the dependence v{ρ0,Ω}from the following system of equations curlv=Ω,div(ρ0(r)·v) = 0 and instead of substitution of vinto the expression for the kinetic energy and dealing with a non-local Hamiltonian of the form H= 1/2/integraldisplay /integraldisplay Gαβ(r1,r2)Ωα(r1)Ωβ(r2)dr1dr2, it is possible to put, with the logarithmic accuracy, the Hamiltonian of the thin vortex ﬁlament equal to the fol- lowing expression 4HA= ΓA/contintegraldisplay ρ0(R)\|Rξ\|dξ, A =Γ 4πln/parenleftbiggL d/parenrightbigg =const. (27) In accordance with the simpliﬁcations made above, the motion of the slender vortex ﬁlament in the spatially in- homogeneous system is described approximately by the equation [Rξ×Rt]ρ0(R)/A=∇ρ0(R)·\|Rξ\|−∂ξ/parenleftbigg ρ0(R)·Rξ \|Rξ\|/parenrightbigg , which is obtained by substitution of the Hamiltonian (27) into the equation (21). The given equation can be solved with respect to Rtand rewritten in terms of the geo- metrically invariant objects t,b, κ, where tis the unit tangent vector on the curve, bis the unit binormal vec- tor, and κis the curvature of the line. As the result, we have the equation Rt/A= [∇(lnρ0(R))×t] +κb, (28) applicability of which is not limited actually by the Eu- lerian hydrodynamics. Let us indicate at least two more physical models where the LIA equation (28) can be use- ful. The ﬁrst model is the theory of Bose-Einstein conden- sation of a weakly non-ideal trapped gas. At zero tem- perature this system is described approximately by the complex order parameter Φ( r, t) (the wave function of the condensate), with the equation of motion (the Gross- Pitaevskii equation) taking in dimensionless variables th e form iΦt=/parenleftbigg −1 2∆ +U(r)−µ+\|Φ\|2/parenrightbigg Φ, (29) where U(r) is the external potential, usually of the quadratic form U(r) =ax2+by2+cz2 2, and the constant µis the chemical potential. Let us sup- posea≥b≥c. It is well-known that the equation (29) admits the hydrodynamical interpretation. The variables ρandpare deﬁned by the relations ρ=\|Φ\|2, ρ p=1 2i(∇Φ·¯Φ−Φ· ∇¯Φ). The corresponding Hamiltonian is HGP=/integraldisplay/bracketleftbigg(∇√ρ)2+ρp2) 2+ (U(r)−µ)ρ+ρ2 2/bracketrightbigg dr. In comparison with the ordinary Eulerian hydrodynam- ics, there is the term depending on the density gradient in this expression. However, with large values of the pa- rameter µ2/a, one may neglect that term in calculationof the equilibrium density inside the space region where the density is not exponentially small, and use the ap- proximate formula ρ0(r)≈µ−U(r),ifµ2≫a, µ −U(r)>0. As known, the equation (29) admits the solutions with the quantized vortex ﬁlaments, the circulation around them being equal to 2 π. In these solutions, the density diﬀers signiﬁcantly from ρ0(r) only at close distances of order 1 /√µfrom the zero-line. Far away we have almost Eulerian ﬂow. Therefore the LIA equation (28) is valid for description of motion of quantum vortex ﬁlament in trapped Bose-condensate of a relatively large size L∼/radicalbig µ/a≫1/√µ, with the parameter A=AGP AGP=1 4ln/parenleftbiggµ2 a/parenrightbigg . The second model is the electron magnetohydrody- namics (EMHD), the Hamiltonian of which contains, be- sides the kinetic energy, the energy of the magnetic ﬁeld Bcreated by the current of the electron ﬂuid through the motionless non-homogeneous ion ﬂuid. In principle, the Hamiltonian of EMHD is determined by the following relations rotv+e mcB=Ω,rotB=4πe mcρ0(r)·v, HEMHD =1 2/integraldisplay/parenleftbigg ρ0(r)v2+1 4πB2/parenrightbigg dr, where eis the electric charge of electron, mis its mass, cis the light speed. In spatially homogeneous system we would obtain that Hh EMHD =ρ0 8π/integraldisplay /integraldisplaye−q\|r1−r2\| \|r1−r2\|Ω(r1)·Ω(r2)dr1dr2, where the screening parameter qis determined by the relation q2=4πρ0e2 m2c2. In the non-homogeneous system qis the function of co- ordinates, with a typical value ˜ q. Let us suppose the inequality L˜q≫1. It is clear that the logarithmic inte- gral in the Hamiltonian is cut now not on the L, but on the skin-depth λ= 1/q. Accordingly, for this case the constant Ain LIA equation (28) is given by the expres- sion AEMHD =Γ 4πln/parenleftbiggmc ed√˜ρ/parenrightbigg . Let us note that in ideal EMHD the LIA works better then in Eulerian hydrodynamics, due to the screening eﬀect. 5ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by RFBR (grant 00-01- 00929), by Program of Support of the Leading Scientiﬁc Schools (grant 00-15-96007), by the INTAS (grant 96- 0413), and by the Fund of Landau Postdoc Scholarship (KFA, Forschungszentrum, Juelich, Germany). ∗e-mail: ruban@itp.ac.ru [1] V. I. Arnol’d, Mathematical Methods of Classical Me- chanics , 2nd edition (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989) [Russian original, Nauka, Moscow, 1974]. [2] B.A.Dubrovin, S.P.Novikov, and A.T.Fomenko, Modern Geometry (Nauka, Moscow, 1979). [3] V.E.Zakharov and E.A.Kuznetsov, ”Hamiltonian formal- ism for nonlinear waves”, Phys. Usp. 40, 1087 (1997). [4] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Perga- mon Press, New York) [Russian original, Nauka, Moscow, 1988]. [5] R.Salmon, ”Hamilton’s principle and Ertel’s theorem”, Am. Inst. Phys. Conf. Proc., 88, 127-135 (1982). [6] R.Salmon, ”Hamiltonian ﬂuid mechanics”, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 225, (1988). [7] N. Padhye and P. J. Morrison, ”Relabeling symme- tries in hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics”, Fiz. Plazmy 22, 960 (1996) [Plasma Phys. Rep. 22, 869 (1996)]. [8] V. I. Il’gisonis and V.P. Lakhin, ”Lagrangian structure of the hydrodynamic models of plasma and conservation laws”, Fiz. Plazmy 25, 64 (1999) [Plasma Phys. Rep. 25, 58 (1999)]. [9] H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics , 6th edition (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1932) [Russian translation, Gostekhizdat, Moscow, 1947]. [10] V.P.Ruban, ”Motion of magnetic ﬂux lines in magneto- hydrodynamics”, ZhETF, 116, 563–585 (1999). [JETP, 89, 299, (1999)]. [11] M.I.Monastyrskii and P.V.Sasorov, ”Topological inva ri- ants in magnetohydrodynamics”, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 93, 1210 (1987) [Sov. Phys. JETP 66, 683 (1987)]. [12] V.Berdichevsky, ”Statistical mechanics of vortex lin es”, Phys. Rev. E, 57, 2885 (1998). [13] E.A.Kuznetsov and V.P.Ruban, ”Hamiltonian dynamics of vortex lines in hydrodynamic-type systems”, Pis’ma v ZhETF, 67, 1012, (1998) [JETP Letters, 67, 1076, (1998)]. [14] E.A.Kuznetsov and V.P.Ruban, ”Hamiltonian dynamics of vortex and magnetic lines in hydrodynamic type sys- tems”, Phys. Rev. E ,61, N.1, 831 (2000). [15] J.Miller, ”Statistical Mechanics of Euler Equations i n Two Dimentions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. ,65, N.17, 2137 (1990). [16] J.Miller, P.B.Weichman, M.C.Cross, ”Statistical me- chanics, Euler’s equation, and Jupiter Red Spot”, Phys. Rev.A 45, N.4, 2328, (1992).[17] V.Berdichevsky, ”Statistical mechanics of point vor- tices”, Phys. Rev. E ,51, N.5, 4432, (1995). [18] M.Rasetti and T.Regge, ”Vortices in He II, current alge - bras and quantum knots”, Physica 80 A, 217 (1975). [19] A.Rouhi and J.Wright, ”Hamiltonian formulation for th e motion of vortices in the presence of a free surface for ideal ﬂuid”, Phys. Rev. E ,48, 1850 (1993). [20] V.P.Ruban, ”Interaction of a vortex ring with the free surface of ideal ﬂuid”, Phys. Rev. E , submitted, (2000). physics/0001070 . [21] H.Hasimoto, ”A soliton on a vortex ﬁlament”, J. Fluid Mech. 51, 477 (1972). [22] F. Dalfovo at al., ”Theory of Bose-Einstein condensati on in trapped gases”, Rev. Mod. Phys., 71, 463-512, (1999). 6
arXiv:physics/0007011v1 [physics.ins-det] 6 Jul 2000A comparative study of the radiation properties of SiC in respect to silicon and diamond S. Lazanua, I. Lazanub, E. Borchicand M. Bruzzic aNational Institute for Materials Physics, P.O.Box MG-7, Bu charest-Magurele, Romania, electronic address: lazanu@alpha1.inﬁm.ro bUniversity of Bucharest, Faculty of Physics, P.O.Box MG-11 , Bucharest-Magurele, Romania, electronic address: ilaz@s cut.ﬁzica.unibuc.ro cUniversita di Firenze, Dipartimento di Energetica, Via S. M arta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy . Abstract Silicon carbide represents a class of semiconductors, due t o its polytypism. Besides its properties of interest for semiconductor devices, some times better than silicon and diamond, it is supposed to have a good radiation toleranc e. In the present work, the bulk degradation of SiC in hadron ﬁelds (pions and proton s), in the energy range between 100 MeV and 10 GeV has been estimated theoretically: the nuclear stopping power and the concentration of primary defects. The results are compared to the similar ones corresponding to diamond and silicon. PACS : 61.80.Az: Theory and models of radiation eﬀects. 61.82.-d: Radiation eﬀects on speciﬁc materials. Key words: SiC, Diamond, Silicon, Hadrons, Radiation damage properti es 1 Introduction. General properties Silicon carbide is a new interesting material for use in the f abrication of opto- electronic and electronic devices, detectors, for the nucl ear waste technology or for use in fusion reactors. In all these applications, thi s semiconductor mate- rial could be exposed to extreme condition of temperature, t o chemical agents and to irradiation ﬁelds. Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 21 October 2012SiC is not a simple semiconductor, it is a whole class of semic onductors because of its polytypism [1]. The polytypism refers to one-dimensi onal polymorphism, i.e. the existence of diﬀerent stackings of the basic struct ural elements along one direction. More than 200 polytypes have been reported [2 ]. Only few of them have practical importance. These include the cubic for m 3C(β), and the 4Hand 6Hhexagonal forms. For the cubic polytype, the symmetry group is T2 d, while for the hexagonal ones this is C4 6v. In Figure 1, the 3 C(β), 4Hand 6Hpolytypes are displayed. Their periodicity is over 3, 4 and 6 bilayers of Si and C, respectively. The layer sequences are ABC..., ABCB..., ABCACB..., respectively. It is important to note that not all atomic bilayers of Si and C in a given structure, and thus n ot all Si or C atoms, are equivalent. In Figure 1, the nonequivalent layer s are denoted by the letters handk, for 6 HSiC even with additional indices. The inequivalence is related to the relative positioning of the layers. All atoms are located in the /bracketleftBig 1120/bracketrightBig plane. Some material characteristics of diﬀerent polytypes of SiC are presented in comparison with the corresponding ones of diamond, silicon and GaAs in Tables 1 and 2. Electronic devices made of SiC can operate at extremely high temperatures without suﬀering from intrinsic conduction eﬀects due to it s wide bandgap. Also, this characteristic allows to emit short wavelength l ight when fabricated into a light emitting diode structure. The high breakdown el ectric ﬁeld, ap- proximately one order of magnitude higher than the silicon o r GaAs one, and the high thermal conductivity, enable the fabrication of ve ry high-voltage, high-power devices that dissipate large amounts of the exce ss heat generated. Additionally, it allows the devices to be placed very close t ogether, providing high device packing density for integrated circuits. SiC de vices can also op- erate at high frequencies (microwave) because of the high sa turation electron drift velocity in the material. Some SiC material characteristics are useful for detection applications: its radiation length lies between the corresponding values of d iamond and silicon; its relatively wide band gap and a relative dielectric const ant of 7.04 allows the assembly of detectors with low noise. With low mobilitie s 450 [cm2V−1s−1] for electrons and 115 [cm2V−1s−1] for holes respectively, SiC does not permit a fast signal development and is not able to operate in high ﬂu xes of particles. The crystalline materials for semiconductor devices used i n high ﬂuences of particles are strongly aﬀected by the eﬀects of radiation. A fter the interaction between the incoming particle and the target, mainly two cla sses of degra- dation eﬀects are observed: surface and bulk material damag e, due to the displacement of atoms from their sites in the lattice. After leptons (photons, 2electrons, muons) irradiation, the eﬀects are dominantly a t the surface, while heavy particles (hadrons and ions) produce both types of dam ages. Up to now, in spite of the experimental and theoretical eﬀort s, the problems related to the behaviour of semiconductor materials in radi ation ﬁelds, the identiﬁcation of the induced defects and their characteris ation, as well as the explanation of the degradation mechanisms are still open pr oblems. The diamond has the reputation of being a radiation hard mate rial and is con- sidered as a good competitor to silicon. It is supposed that t he SiC behaviour in the radiation ﬁeld to be between diamond and silicon. The treatment of the interaction between the incident parti cle and the solid material can be performed from the point of view of the projec tile or of the tar- get. In the ﬁrst case, the relevant quantities are the energy loss (or equivalently stopping power) and in the second situation the eﬀects of the interactions are described by physical quantities characterising material degradation. 2 Mechanisms of degradation At the passage of the incident charged particle in the semico nductor material same of its energy is deposited into the target. The charged p articles interact with both atomic and electronic systems in a solid. The total rate of energy loss, could, in general, be divided artiﬁcially into two com ponents, the nuclear and the electronic part. The energy lost due to interactions with the electrons of the target gives rise to material ionisation, while the energy lost in interactio ns with nuclei is at the origin of defect creation. A comprehensive theoretical treatment of electronic stopp ing, which covers all energies of interest cannot be formulated simply because of diﬀerent approxi- mations concerning both the scattering and contribution of diﬀerent electrons in the solid. For fast particles with velocities higher then the orbital velocities of electrons, the Bethe-Bloch formula has been used [3]. At l ower velocities, inner electrons have velocities greater than particle velo city, and therefore do not contribute to the energy loss. This regime has been model led for the gen- eral case by Lindhard and Scharﬀ [4] and the particular case o f 6H-SiC has been treated, e.g. in reference [5]. If the particle has a pos itive charge, and a velocity close to the orbital velocity of its outer electron s, it has a high prob- ability of capturing an electron from one of the atoms of the m edium through which it passes. This process contributes to the total inela stic energy loss since the moving ion has to expend energy in the removal of the elect rons which it 3captures. The nuclear stopping depends on the detailed nature of the at omic scattering, and this in turn depends intimately on the form of the interac tion potential. At low energies, a realistic potential based on the Thomas-Fer mi approximation has been used in the literature [4] and at higher energies, wh ere scattering results from the interaction of unscreened nuclei, a Ruther ford collision model is to be used. There is not one physical quantity dedicated to the global ch aracterisation of the eﬀects of radiation in the semiconductor material. A p ossible one is the concentration of primary radiation induced defects on t he unit particle ﬂuence (CPD) [6]. Due to the fact that it does not exist a theor y describing these interaction processes, phenomenological models are used. In this paper, the mechanism considered in the study of the in teraction be- tween the incoming particle and the solid, by which bulk defe cts are produced, is the following: the particle, heavier than the electron, w ith electrical charge or not, interacts with the electrons and with the nuclei of th e crystalline lat- tice. The nuclear interaction produces bulk defects. As a re sult of the inter- action, depending on the energy and on the nature of the incid ent particle, one or more light particles are produced, and usually one or m ore heavy recoil nuclei. These nuclei have charge and mass numbers lower or at least equal with those of the medium. After the interaction process, the recoil nucleus or nuclei, if they have suﬃcient energy, are displaced from t he lattice posi- tions into interstitials. Then, the primary knock-on nucle us, if its energy is large enough, can produce the displacement of a new nucleus, and the process could continue as a cascade, until the energy of the nucleus b ecomes lower than the threshold for atomic displacements. Because of the regular nature of the crystalline lattice, the displacement energy is anisot ropic. In the concrete evaluation of defect production, the nuclear interactions must be modelled, see for example [6–8]. The primary interaction between the h adron and the nucleus of the lattice presents characteristics reﬂecting the peculiarities of the hadron, especially at relatively low energies. If the inela stic process is initiated by nucleons, the identity of the incoming projectile is lost , and the creation of secondary particles is associated with energy exchanges wh ich are of the order of MeV or larger. For pion nucleus processes, the absorption , the process by which the pion disappears as a real particle, is also possibl e. The energy dependence of cross sections, for proton and pion interaction with the nucleus, present very diﬀerent behaviours: the proton- nucleus cross sec- tions decrease with the increase of the projectile energy, t hen have a minimum at relatively low energies, followed by a smooth increase, w hile the pion nu- cleus cross sections present for all processes a large maxim um, at about 160 MeV, reﬂecting the resonant structure of interaction (the ∆ 33resonance pro- 4duction), followed by other resonances, at higher energies , but with much less importance. Due to the multitude of open channels in these pr ocesses, some simplifying hypothesis have been done [9]. The process of partitioning the energy of the recoil nuclei ( produced due the interaction of the incident particle with the nucleus, plac ed in its lattice site) by new interaction processes, between electrons (ionisation ) and atomic motion (displacements) is considered in the frame of the Lindhard t heory [10]. 3 Results and discussions In Figure 2, the nuclear stopping power calculated for pions , protons and C and Si ions in SiC is represented as a function of the kinetic ener gy of the incident particle. The nuclear stopping power is greater for heavier incident particles: ions compared with protons and pions respectively. In a give n medium, the position of its maximum is the same for all particles with the same charge. The nuclear stopping power is calculated using the Lindhard Sch arﬀ hypothesis [4] for C and Si ions, so that the charge is the atomic number, in fa ct the maximum charge possible. The concentration of the primary radiation induced defects on unit ﬂuence has been calculated starting from the following equation: CPD (E) =1 2Ed/integraldisplay/summationdisplay idσi dΩL(ERi)dΩ (1) where Eis the kinetic energy of the incident particle, Edthe threshold energy for displacements in the lattice, ERithe recoil energy of the residual nucleus, L(ERi) the Lindhard factor describing the partition between ioni sation and displacements and dσi/dΩ the diﬀerential cross section for the process respon- sible in defect production. In the concrete calculations, a ll nuclear processes, and all mechanisms inside each process are included in the su mmation over index i. The partition of the energy of the incoming particle in the se miconductor ma- terial between ionisation and displacements has been calcu lated analytically, solving the general equations of the Lindhard theory in some physical approxi- mations. Details about the hypothesis used could be found in reference [11]. In the particular case of the SiC, a binary compound, the Lindha rd curves have been calculated separately for each component, and the aver age weight Bragg additivity has been used. In ﬁgure 3, the displacement energ y versus recoil energy for diﬀerent recoils, characterised by their charge and mass numbers, in SiC is represented. 5All curves start, at low energies, from the same curve; they h ave at low en- ergies identical values of the energy spent into displaceme nts, independent on the charge and mass number of the recoil. At higher energies, the curves start to detach from this main branch. This happens at lower energi es if their charge and mass numbers are smaller. The maximum energy transferre d into displace- ments corresponds to recoils of maximum possible charge and mass numbers (corresponding to the heaviest element, Si in this case). Th e curves present then a smooth increase with the energy. For the energy range c onsidered here, the asymptotic limit of the displacement energy is not reach ed. For the cross sections for protons and pions interactions wi th carbon and silicon experimental data and theoretical extrapolations have been used - see references [7,12,13] and references cited therein. As stated in Section 2, the minimum energy required to form a s table vacancy - interstitial pair is usually called the displacement ener gy (Ed). The regular nature of the crystalline lattice, conduces to its anisotro py, atoms being more readily displaced along some directions than in others. Thi s anisotropy is also at the origin of diﬀerences in the rate production of defects as a function of orientation. In the literature, both calculated and experi mental values for Ed are reported for diﬀerent crystals. For SiC, the situation is even more complicated, and a thresh old for atomic displacements could be deﬁned for each polytype, for each at omic species, and for each direction in the crystal. Some calculations have been reported in the literature for Ed: by classical molecular-dynamics simulations using empirical potentia ls [14], and also using modern ﬁrst-principle methods [15], both for βSiC and 6 HSiC, along some directions of interest. Experimental values are obtained from high voltage electro n microscopy [16], energetic ion beam spectroscopy [17], and Rutherford backs cattering analysis along diﬀerent channelling directions [17–19]. In the opinion of some authors [18], all these methods give co nsistent results, the mean threshold energy for atomic displacements being of the order of 35 eV on the Si sublattice, and of the order of 20 eV on the C sublat tice. These are the values we used in the calculations. Figure 4 presents the energy dependence of the CPD calculate d (as stated above) for pions in SiC, together with the estimated values f or proton irra- diation. In the same ﬁgure, for comparison, the CPD produced by pions and protons in diamond [7,13] and silicon are also represented. The values corre- sponding to protons in silicon are averages from the calcula tions reported in references [20] and [21]. It could be observed that the degra dations induced by 6pions and protons are very diﬀerent and reﬂect the peculiari ties of the inter- actions of the two particles with the nuclei of the semicondu ctor. For pions, the maximum of degradation is produced in the region of the ∆ 33resonance, corresponding to about 140 - 160 MeV kinetic energy. In compa rison with this behaviour, the maximum of the degradation is produced, for p rotons, at low energies, and a smooth and slow decrease of the CPD is estimat ed with the increase of the energy. For the energy range considered in th is paper, with the exception of the resonance region, the degradation indu ced by protons is higher than that for pions in SiC. As we expected, the degrada tion of SiC induced by hadrons, is between the diamond and silicon degra dations. We also evaluated the CPD for diﬀerent polytypes, and arrive d at the conclu- sion that there is no signiﬁcant diﬀerences between their be haviour in radiation ﬁelds. These theoretical results are in agreement with the e xperimental data reported in reference [22]. 4 Summary In the present paper we reviewed the main properties of SiC in view of its utilisation in radiation ﬁelds. In this respect, the nuclea r stopping power of pions, protons, C and Si ions in SiC has been calculated. The Lindhard curves, characterising the partition of the re coils energy be- tween ionisation and displacements has also been calculate d, using analytical approximations. The concentration of primary induced defects on unit partic le ﬂuence has been calculated for the case of pion and proton irradiation, and t he eﬀects of these particles have been found intermediate in SiC between the co rresponding ones in Si and diamond. Negligible diﬀerences have been found between the 3 C, 4Hand 6Hpolytypes in what regards the eﬀects of pion and proton irradiations. References [1] A. P. Verma and P. Krishina, ”Polymorphism and Polytypism in Crystals” , Wiley, New York, 1966. [2] W. R. L. Lambrecht, S. Limpijummong, S. N. Rashkeev and B. Segall, Phys. St. Sol. (b) 202, n.5 (1997) 5. [3] C. Caso et. al., Eur. J. Phys. C3(1998) 1. 7[4] J. Lindhard and M. Scharﬀ, Phys. Rev. 124(1961) 128. [5] E. Morvan, P. Godignon, S. Berberich, M. Vellvehi, J. Mil lan, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Research B 147 , (1999) 68. [6] I. Lazanu, S. Lazanu, E. Borchi, M. Bruzzi, Nucl. Instr. a nd Meth. Phys. Reseach, A 406 (1998) 259. [7] I. Lazanu, S. Lazanu, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Reseac h,A 432 (1999) 374. [8] S. Lazanu, I. Lazanu, U. Biggeri, E. Borchi, M. Bruzzi, in Conf. Proc. Vol. 59, ”Nuclear Data for Science and Technology”, Eds. G. Reﬀo, A. V entura and C. Gradi. (SIF, Bologna, 1997) p.1528. [9] S. Lazanu, I. Lazanu, U. Biggeri, S. Sciortino, Nucl. Ins tr. and Meth. Phys. Reseach, A 413 (1998) 242. [10] J. Lindhard, V. Nielsen, M. Scharﬀ, P. V. Thomsen, Mat. P hys. Medd. Dan Vid. Sesk. 33(1963) 1. [11] S. Lazanu, I. Lazanu, Analytical approximations of the Lindhard equations describing radiation eﬀects, e-preprint LANL hep-ph/9910 317, submitted to Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. A. [12] S.Lazanu, I.Lazanu, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Resea ch,A 419 (1998) 570. [13] S.Lazanu, I.Lazanu, E.Borchi, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Sup pl.)78(1999) 683. [14] R.Devanathan, W.J.Weber, T.Diaz de la Rubia, Nucl. Ins tr. and Meth. in Phys. Res.B 141 (1998) 118. [15] W.Windl, T.J.Lenosky, J.D.Kress, A.F.Voter, Nucl. In str. and Meth. in Phys. Res.B 141 (1998) 61. [16] L.A.Honstvet, R.B.Smallman, P.M.Marquis, Phil. Mag. 41(1980) 201. [17] M.G.Grimaldi, L.Calgano, P.Musumoci, N.Frangis, J.V an Landuyt, J. Appl. Phys.81(1997) 7181. [18] W.Jiang, W.J.Weber, S.Thevuthasan, D.E.McCready, Nu cl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 148 (1998) 557. [19] W.Jiang, S.Thevuthasan W.J.Weber, R.Grotzschel, Nuc l. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 161 (2000) 501. [20] G. P. Summers, E. A. Burke, P. Shapiro, S. R. Messenger, R . J. Walters, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., NS-40 , (1990) 1372. [21] A. van Ginneken, preprint Fermilab, FN-522 (1989). [22] E. Wendler, A.Heft, W.Welsch, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 141 (1998) 10. 8Table Captions Table 1: General properties of diamond, silicon, and GaAs. Table 2: General properties of some polytypes of SiC Figure captions Figure 1: Arrangement of Si (ﬁlled circles) and C (open circl es) atoms in the polytypes 3 C, 4Hand 6Hof SiC. All atoms are located in the/bracketleftBig 1120/bracketrightBig plane. Figure 2: Nuclear stopping power of pions, protons, carbon a nd silicon in diamond, silicon and SiC versus the kinetic energy of the res pective particle. Figure 3: The displacement energy versus the recoil energy f or diﬀerent parti- cles (characterised by their atomic and mass number) in SiC. Figure 4: Concentration of primary induced defects on parti cle unit ﬂuence for (up to down): pions in silicon [9]; protons in silicon [20,21 ]; pions and protons in SiC (present work); pions and protons [7,13] in diamond. A ll curves for pions are represented continuous, while the corresponding ones for protons dashed. The values of the CPD induced by protons in silicon ar e an average between the calculations reported in references [20] and [2 1] respectively. 9Table 1 Material properties Diamond Silicon GaAs Crystal structure cubic cubic cubic Lattice constant/bracketleftBig ˚A/bracketrightBig 3.567 5.43 5.05 Atomic number 6 14 31/33 Atomic mass 12.011 28.08 69.7/74.9 Density/bracketleftBig g/cm2/bracketrightBig 3.5 2.33 5.32 Radiation length/bracketleftBig g/cm2/bracketrightBig 42.7 21.82 12.2 Mobility e: 1800 e: 1450 e: 8000 /bracketleftBig cm2V-1s-1/bracketrightBig h: 1200 h: 450 h: 400 Band gap [eV] 5.47 1.12 1.43 Threshold energy for displacements [eV]) 43 25 10 Dielectric constant (relative) 5.7 11.9 13.1 Breakdown electric ﬁeld [V/cm] (for 1000 V operation) 2.5x1053x105 Thermal conductivity 9.9011.5 0.5 [V/cmK] 23.22 @ RT 15.23 Saturated electron drift velocity [cm/s] @ 2x105V/cm 1x1071x107 dE/dx/bracketleftBig MeVcm2/g/bracketrightBig 1.34 1.664 1.37 Energy to form an electron-hole pair [eV] @ RT 13 3.72 4.6 10Table 2 Material properties 6HSiC 4HSiC βSiC Crystal structure hexagonal hexagonal cubic Lattice constant a: 3.03 a: 3.03 a: 3.03 /bracketleftBig ˚A/bracketrightBig c: 14.88 c: 9.92 c: 7.42 Atomic number 6/14 6/14 6/14 Atomic mass 12.01/28.08 12.01/28.08 12.01/28.08 Density/bracketleftBig g/cm2/bracketrightBig 3.2 3.2 3.2 Radiation length/bracketleftBig g/cm2/bracketrightBig 28.9 28.9 28.9 Mobility e: 450 /bracketleftBig cm2V-1s-1/bracketrightBig h: 115 Band gap [eV] 2.9 3.3 2.2 Threshold energy for Si: 35 Si: 35 Si: 35 displacements [eV]) C: 20 C: 20 C: 20 Dielectric constant (relative) 7.04 7.04 7.27 Breakdown electric ﬁeld [V/cm] (for 1000 V operation) 2.5x1052x105 Thermal conductivity 4.9 4.9 4.9 [V/cmK] @RT Saturated electron drift velocity [cm/s] @ 2x105V/cm 2x1072.5x107 dE/dx/bracketleftBig MeVcm2/g/bracketrightBig 1.35 1.35 1.35 Energy to form an electron-hole pair [eV] @ RT 8.4 11ABCABCABCABCA BCABC A3C4H 6H khkhk1k2 [1100][0001] k/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G34/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G33/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G32/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G31/G31 /G30/G20/G30/G31 /G30/G20/G31/G31 /G30/G20/G32/G31 /G30/G20/G33/G31 /G30/G20/G34 /G50 /G61/G72 /G74/G69 /G63/G6c /G65/G20 /G4b/G69 /G6e/G65 /G74/G69 /G63/G20 /G45/G6e /G65/G72 /G67/G79 /G20/G5b /G4d/G65 /G56/G5d/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G36/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G35/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G34/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G33/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G32/G31 /G30/G20 /G2d/G31/G31 /G30/G20/G30/G31 /G30/G20/G31/G31 /G30/G20/G32/G31 /G30/G20/G33/G31 /G30/G20/G34/G31 /G30/G20/G35/G31 /G30/G20/G36 /G4e/G75/G63/G6c/G65/G61/G72/G20/G53/G74/G6f/G70/G70/G69/G6e/G67/G20/G50/G6f/G77/G65/G72/G20/G5b/G4d/G65/G56/G20/G63/G6d/G32/G2f/G67/G5d/G70 /G2f/G43 /G70 /G2f/G53 /G69 /G70 /G2f /G53/G69 /G43 /G70 /G69/G2f /G43 /G70 /G69 /G2f/G53 /G69 /G70 /G69/G2f /G53/G69 /G43 /G43 /G2f/G43 /G53 /G69 /G2f/G53 /G69 /G43 /G2f/G53 /G69/G43 /G53 /G69 /G2f/G53 /G69/G31/G30/G20/G2d/G33/G31/G30/G20/G2d/G32/G31/G30/G20/G2d/G31/G31/G30/G20 /G30/G31/G30/G20 /G31/G31/G30/G20 /G32/G31/G30/G20 /G33/G31/G30/G20 /G34 /G52/G65/G63 /G6f/G69/G6c/G20/G45/G6e /G65/G72/G67/G79/G20/G5b /G4d/G65/G56/G5d/G31/G30/G20/G2d/G33/G31/G30/G20/G2d/G32/G31/G30/G20/G2d/G31 /G44/G69/G73/G70/G6c/G61/G63/G65/G6d/G65/G6e/G74/G20/G45/G6e/G65/G72/G67/G79/G20/G5b/G4d/G65/G56/G5d /G28/G31/G34/G2c/G32/G38/G29 /G28/G31/G32/G2c/G32/G34/G29 /G28/G31/G30/G2c/G32/G30/G29 /G20/G28/G36/G2c/G31/G32/G29 /G20/G28/G34/G2c/G20/G39/G29/G31/G30/G20/G32/G31/G30/G20/G33/G31/G30/G20/G34 /G4b/G69/G6e/G65/G74 /G69/G63/G20/G45/G6e/G65/G72/G67/G79/G20 /G5b/G4d/G65/G56/G5d/G31/G30/G20/G2d/G32/G31/G30/G20/G2d/G31 /G43/G50/G44/G20/G28/G31/G2f/G63/G6d/G29/G70/G69 /G2f/G53/G69 /G70/G2f/G53/G69 /G70/G69/G2f/G53/G69/G43 /G70/G2f /G53/G69/G43 /G70/G69/G2f/G43 /G70/G2f/G43
arXiv:physics/0007012v1 [physics.gen-ph] 6 Jul 2000General relativitistic theory of quasars. I.∗ Zahid Zakir Institute of Noosphere, 11a Sayram, Tashkent, 700170 Uzbekistan zahid@in.edu.uz Abstract In the paper physics/0007003 it was shown that after a correc t deﬁnition of the relations between observables in general relativity a horizon and a singulari ty disappear. The general relativity in physical variables really predicts an existence of supercompact rel ativistic stars and relativistic galactic nuclei with (light and heavy) barionic and quark contents instead o f unphysical black holes. They have the radii near the gravitational radii and emit the spectral lin es with high redshifts and the energetic (X- and gamma) photons. The quasars can be naturally interpreted as such relativistic supercompact objects and their high redshifts explained mainly as a gravitational re dshift. The existing of the second mechanism of redshift in addition to the Doppler shift leads to a normal ization of all parameters of quasars as the compact galactic nuclei. In principle new consequence of ge neral relativity is a prediction that some of quasars may be the relativistic stars in the Galaxy. A short t ime variability of such quasars then can be naturally explained. ∗c/circlecopyrtInstitute of Noosphere, 2000. 12 PARTICLE KINEMATICS IN TERM OF PHYSICAL VARIABLES 2 1 Introduction The black holes, predicted by a standard treatment of general relativity, up to now not convincingly re- vealed, but at the same time more than 13200 quasars are discovered with very high red shifts ( z <5.8) which can not be explained in the standard theory without assumptions about fantastic masses, lumi- nosities and fantastically small sizes and large dis- tances. In [4] I proposed a new description of the par- ticle’s motion in the Schwarzschild ﬁeld in term of the physical observables of general relativity. In this new picture the falling is fully reversible in time and the horizons and singularities disappear. It is shown that the correctly interpreted general relativity not predicts a collapse and black holes, but it naturally explains the quasars with the arbitrary high redshifts as relativistic stars or galactic nuclei with ordinary masses, luminosities, sizes and distances. In the ﬁrst part of the present paper I shortly describe the new interpretation of quasars and in the second part a coincidence with the astrophysics of quasars will be discussed. More detail considerations and discussions will be presented in [3] and in the forthcoming publications. 2 Particle kinematics in term of physical variables Let we observe on L-frame the freely falling from in- ﬁnity sample particle. We can obtain an equation of motion for this particle as the local (physical) time τ dependence of the radial coordinate Rby using the relation: (dr cdτ)2=v2 c2=rg R(1) which leads from an energy conservation condition in the static ﬁeld [2][1]. We have: ±cdτ=dr/radicalBigg R rg=dRγ−1/2/radicalBigg R rg(2) or: ±c(τ−τ0) =1 r1/2 g/integraldisplayRdR/radicalbig R−rg(3) After the integration we obtain: cτ=±2(R+ 2rg) 3r1/2 g/radicalbig R−rg (4) where we take τ0= 0 at R=rgwhich means that τ= 0 at R=rgand then a worldline of particle is symmetric under this moment. It is surprising, that aminimal distance, which can be reached by the falling particle is R=rgand then it elastically reﬂects from the source. A geometric reason for such behavior of Rcan be understanded after an obtaining direct relationship between I-frame radial coordinate Rand the physical radial distance in the gravitational ﬁeld r(R) on L- frame as: r(R) =/integraldisplaydR/radicalBig 1−rg R=R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+rgF(R) (5) where F(R) = ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/radicalBigg R rg(1 +/radicalbigg 1−rg R)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(6) with property F(rg) = 0.The lower limit of inte- gration here may be only R0=rg, where the physi- cal radius vanishes: r(R) = 0. This means that zero point of the physical radius r= 0 where the source lo- cated from the point of view of L-frame observer, cor- responds to the value of the radial coordinate R0=rg of I-frame observer. Therefore, the result of the local gravitational extension of radial distances between or- bits in the curved spacetime is the global topological diﬀerence between L- and I-frame coordinate systems when to the values of physical radius rin the interval (0,∞) correspond the values of radial coordinate R in the interval ( rg,∞) and for their coincidence the interior region of gravitational radius R < r gmust be excluded as unphysical part of I-frame coordinate system. We see that in our new picture the particle can not ”penetrate’ to an interior of region R < r g, a horizon and singularities are disappear, the world line of par- ticle is continuous, the frame is complete (not con- tains unobservable regions) and the process is fully reversible in time. If local inertial observers in each orbit register the falling particle and after some time register a returning of this particle, these events are absolute physical facts and the such character of the world line is invariant under transformations of the local inertial frames. We can consider this process from a point of view of the F-frame observer, where the space-time inter- val (proper time) of falling particle is: c2dT2= (c2dτ2 dr2−1)dr2=R rgdR2(7) If we directly integrate with lower limit R0= 0 then we obtain the well known Lemaitre’s result (see [2][1]) which is the basic formula for modern stan- dard treatments of the Schwarzschild problem with horizon, collapse and singularity.3 THEORY OF RELATIVISTIC STARS 3 But we also know that on the I-frame radial coor- dinate Rcontains a ”physical” or ”dynamic” part Rg, coinciding with the physical radius rand the unphys- ical part rgand it can be represented as R=Rg+rg, where Rg= 0 at R=rg. Therefore, we have: c(T−T0) =±1 r1/2 g/integraldisplay/radicalbig Rg+rgdRg (8) and: c(T−T0) =±2 3r1/2 g(R3/2−r3/2 g) (9) This formula diﬀers from the standard black (white) hole picture because of here the falling particle elasti- cally reﬂects from the gravitational radius R=rgat T=T0and it can not ”penetrating” into the region R < r g. From the previous energy conservation condition an equation of motion for the falling particle in term of the local Schwarzschild observer’s time tcan be obtained as: ±cdt=dR (1−rg R)/radicalBig rg R(10) and after the integration we have: ±c(t−t0) =/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleR β1/2[2 3+ 4β+β3/2K(R)]/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleR1 Ra(11) where β=rg/Rand: K(R) = ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1−β1/2 1 +β1/2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(12) This time interval is divergent if the lower limit Ra=rg, but this divergence is the result of the point- ness of source. The real source has a ﬁnite size aand the lower value of physical radius is not zero but is r=a. In term of radial coordinate this means that Ra=a+rgis the minimal value of radial coordinate Rwhich deﬁne the value of t0. Then we obtain the ﬁnite time interval for the falling and the reﬂecting of particle in coordinates of the observer at inﬁnity. The space-time interval for a radially falling pho- ton on L- frame is: ds2=γc2dt−γ−1dR2= 0 (13) Therefore, a local time dependence of Ralong the world line of photon on L-frame (light cone) is: cτ=±r (14) or±cτ=R/radicalbigg 1−rg R+rgF(R) (15) and in term of I-frame time: ±c(t−t0) =R−rg+rgln\|R−rg a\| (16) Here we take τ=t= 0 at R=rg. When the times τandtare change at intervals ( −∞,0) and (0,∞),Rchanges at interval ( rg,∞). The trajectory of photon also is time symmetric and it elastically reﬂects from the source at R=rg. Thus, we can conclude, that: 1) World lines of particles and photons are con- tinuous and timelike, at all values of T, τandtin the interval ( −∞,∞) the radial coordinate Rchanges in the interval ( rg,∞). Therefore, Schwarzschild’s frame and coordinates are complete; 2) The falling particles and photons elastically re- ﬂect at R=rg,the processes are fully reversible in time and all times are ﬁnite (for ﬁnite distances and ﬁnite size sources); 3) The horizon, singularity and collapse are not appear in general relativity if we deﬁne the space- time variables adequately to the true geometry of the curved spacetime. 3 Theory of relativistic stars Let we consider Tolman’s solution of Einstein equa- tions in the case of spherically symmetric dust matter (see [2]). The line element can be chosen as: ds2=c2dτ2−eλ(τ,R a)dR2 a−R2(τ, Ra)dΩ2(17) with a solution: eλ(τ,R a)= (∂R ∂Ra)2[1 +f(Ra)]−1(18) HereRais a radial coordinate of dust matter par- ticle and τis its proper time. Then an equation of motion can be obtained as: (∂R c∂τ)2=f(Ra) +F(Ra) R(19) which has a solution: ±c[τ0(Ra)−τ] =/integraldisplaydR (f+F R)1/2(20) Here the three types of solutions can be obtained atf >0,f <0 and f= 0. In the standard treat- ments a scenario of collapse is qualitatively the same for the every cases [2]. We take the simplest case4 QUASARS AS RELATIVISTIC STARS AND GALACTIC NUCLEI 4 f= 0 since in other cases the pictures are qualita- tively the same as in this case. The time dependence of the radial coordinate then directly can be obtained as: c[τ0(Ra)−τ] =±2 3F1/2[R3/2 a−R3/2] (21) The radial distances on F-and I-frames have iden- tical scale units and here RandRaare identical with I-frame radial coordinate, which contains the physical part ( Rph) and the unphysical constant part ( rg(e)) in the form R=Rph+rg(e). Here rg(e)>0 is an eﬀective gravitational radius which can be calculated taking into account a radial coordinate dependence of F(Ra) and using the fact that every layer with deﬁ- niteRafalls to a center of gravity due to a gravitating of the Schwarzschild ﬁeld of the mass inside the radius Ra. Then we come to the analogous conclusions as in the case of falling sample particle in external static ﬁeld. Particularly, a free falling layer of dust mat- ter with radial coordinate Raafter the time τ=τ0 reaches the center of gravity with Rph= 0, which for the observer at inﬁnity located on the eﬀective gravitational radius R=rg(e), the layer reﬂects at this value of R=rg(e)and then it move away. The horizon and collapse disappear, spacetime intervals for physical objects are timelike (or lightlike). A volume of sphere around the source is: V= 4π/integraldisplay R2γ−1/2dR= 4π/integraldisplay R2γ−1/2dRg(22) This integral easily can be calculated and we ob- tain: V(R) =4π 3R3γ1/2[γ+9rg 4R(1−rg 2R) +9r2 g 2R2]+ (23) + 4πr3 g[ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleR1/2 r1/2 g(1 +γ1/2)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle− (24) −3 16ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2R rg(1 +γ1/2)−1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle] (25) We see, that V(rg) = 0 and the region R < r g is excluded from the space volume of general relativ- ity since the lower limit of integration is R=rg(or Rg= 0). This fact and the results of preceding con- siderations lead to a new picture of stellar evolution including new families of compact relativistic stars with sizes near their gravitational radii. Relativistic stars we will classify by two natural parameters - rg which ﬁx a mass ( M)andβ=rg/Rwhich ﬁx a red- shift ( z).In term of these natural parameters the volume of star is:V(R) =4πr3 g 3{β−3γ1/2[1 +5 4β+27 8β2]+ (26) + 3 ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleβ−1/2(1 +γ1/2)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle−9 16ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 β(1 +γ1/2)−1/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle (27) A density of star with mass Min a case of homo- geneous matter is: ρ=M·V−1(R) (28) Supercompact stars with R∼rg, have a ﬁnite volume and a ﬁnite density. Hence, the hierarchy of supercompact stars with ordinary and extraordinary physical matter not stop on the neutron star’s level, but it continued to more dense physical states. For the stars with masses more than the critical mass of neutron star’s stability M > (3÷5)M⊙the family of stable states can appears. The ﬁrst is the family ofheavy baryon stars, containing baryonic resonances (Λ,Σ,Ξ,∆). The multiquark hadron stars andquark stars, which appear after quark-hadron phase transi- tion also can be considered. Some of the observing candidates to black holes can be one of above men- tioned type stars. The searches of the supermassive stars containing subquarks or other types of substituents of quarks and leptons ( subquark stars), heavy particles of the grand uniﬁcation also become a correct search pro- grams without any gravitational restrictions . In the next section a theory of quasars as the rela- tivistic stars or relativistic galactic nuclei will be pre- sented as the direct consequence of general relativity without any additional hypotheses. 4 Quasars as relativistic stars and galactic nuclei Quasi Stellar Objects ( quasars ) in astrophysics de- ﬁned as the point sources of emission with high values of redshift of their spectral lines. The last catalogs in- clude more than 13200 quasars with z <5.8. Since a stellar redshift in black hole treatments of general relativity was restricted at z <0.2 with the maximal value for the neutron stars, a standard in- terpretation of quasar’s high redshift mechanism was only the cosmological Doppler redshift. In this in- terpretation the luminosities of quasars, which sizes are very small with respect to galaxies ( <1ps), nev- ertheless 103÷104times exceed the luminosities of galaxies. The distances then must be (0 .1÷5)·109ps. Many of quasars have broad emission lines and some of them have also absorbtion lines with suﬃciently5 CONCLUSION 5 less values of redshifts than emission lines of the same quasar. At such fantastic parameters some of quasars are variable and their luminosities changed 2 ÷3 times during of few days, weeks or years which probably leads to the contradictions with causality. In our treatment of relativistic stars all restric- tions to superdense states and to redshifts disappear. We can demonstrate this new situation how the red- shift restriction of previous treatments disappears in our case. In an inequality (see §11.6 [1]): /radicalbig g00(0)≤γ1/2(R0)−rg 2R3 0/integraldisplayR′dR′ [1−2GMR′2 c2R3 0]1/2(29) after the calculation of the integral with limits (R0, rg(e)), where rg(e)is some ”eﬀective ” gravita- tional radius inside of the star, we have: /radicalbig g00(0)≤3 2γ1/2(R0)−1 2[1−rgr2 g(e) R3 0]1/2(30) Ifrg(e)= 0 we obtain 8 −9β≥0 due to a property/radicalbig g00(0)>0 and the inequality β=rg/R0<8/9 and then we come to the standard redshift restriction z <2. But since in our treatment 0 < rg(e)≤rg, then in fact we have: 8−9β+η2β3≥0 (31) where η=rg(e)/rg>0 and 0 < β≤1 for the ﬁnite mass sources. This inequality is obeyed at any value of η >0 and therefore, in general relativity in fact not exist any restriction for the values of z. Two statements of new theory of relativistic stars, the ﬁrst that the superdense matter not collapsed but formed new types of stars and galactic nuclei and, the second that no restrictions for stellar and extragalac- tic objects redshifts, lead to the new general relativis- tic theory of quasars as the relativistic galactic nuclei and (probably) as relativistic stars in the Milky Way. The main mechanism of high redshift of quasars from the point of view of general relativity is the grav- itational redshift since they are supercompact objects with sizes near their gravitational radii and they have β= 1−ε, where ε≪1. In the case of galactic nuclei the cosmological Doppler redshift must be separated from the full redshift by some astrophysical methods and then the gravitational part of redshift can be de- termined, or conversely, if we can estimate indepen- dently the gravitational redshift then we can more ex- actly deﬁne the Doppler part and then can determine the true distances. But in both cases the distances,luminosities and masses of extragalactic quasars be- come 104−105times less than modern standard es- timations and they become normal with respect to the analogous parameters of galactic nuclei. This fact show the ﬁrst normalization role of our treatment for the astrophysics of quasars. The redshift diﬀerences between absorbtion and emission lines easily explained by an existence of ab- sorbing layers at surface of relativistic objects since small diﬀerence of radii (few percent from rg) be- tween layers leads to large redshift diﬀerences (∆ z∼ 0.1÷1.0). Up to now quasars considered only as extragalac- tic large distance and very massive (109÷1012M⊙) objects since only the Doppler shift explanation of their redshift. If we treat the redshift mainly as the gravitational one, then it will be not wonderful from the point of view of general relativity if in the case of some quasars the full observed redshift may be only gravitational redshift . Such quasars may be in the lo- cal group of galaxies and here we can obtain a useful information about the dynamics and the structure of quasars, and obviously, about the galaxies evolution. New in principle prediction of the present version of general relativity consists in the possibility of the ﬁnding of quasars in the Milky Way as the relativis- tic stars with high redshifts but with the ordinary stel- lar masses, luminosities and distances. The particle content of such small quasars is not suﬃcient for our purposes in this paper since the same value of redshift may be in the case of various relativistic stars with diﬀerent particles (neutrons, hyperons, quarks) and masses (5 ÷100M⊙). The searches of such quasars in the Galaxy or identiﬁcation of some known quasars (in equatorial zone of the Galaxy) as relativistic stars will be very important for veriﬁcation of the present treatment of general relativity. 5 Conclusion The Schwarzschild’s world in physical variables be- comes simple and normal from a point of view of tra- ditional physics. Falling matter normally scatters on the source and accretion. The interior of the horizon, collapse, irreversibility and singularity are disappear, an evaporation make no sense [3]. Only methods and results retain their validity in general relativity which work with an exterior region of the gravitational ra- dius (for example, an accretion) and not use unphys- ical variables of the interior region. The general relativity in combination with parti- cle physics predicts new families of relativistic stars and galactic nuclei which we observe as quasars, AGN or others, instead of black holes. The details of the new theory of quasars and theREFERENCES 6 preliminary comparisons with observations will be presented in the second paper. References [1] Weinberg S. (1972) Gravitation and cosmology. J.Wiley, N.Y. [2] Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M. (1988) The classical Theory of Fields. M. [3] Zakir Z. (2000) Structure of space-time. parts I and II (in preparation). [4] Zakir Z. General relativity as a complete theory and its new consequences. 13 p. In ”Structure of space-time. part II”, Tashkent, 2000, paper 18. (arXiv, physics/0007003; the ﬁrs version see in: physics/0005009).
arXiv:physics/0007013 6 Jul 2000BEAM CURRENT MONITORS IN THE NLCTA * Christopher Nantista and Chris Adolphsen Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, P.O. Box 4349, Stanford, California 94309, USA Abstract The current profile along the 126 ns, multi-bunch beam pulse in the Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator (NLCTA) is monitored with fast toroids (rise time ~1 ns). Inserted at several positions along the beam line, they allow us to track current transmission as a function of position along the bunch train. Various measurements, such as rise time, current, width, and slope, are made on the digitized signals, which can be corrected in software by means of stored frequency response files. The design and implementation of these devices is described. I. INTRODUCTION The Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator [1] at SLAC runs with an electron beam bunched at the X-band frequency of 11.424 GHz. A single pulse of ~126 ns duration contains a train of over 1400 bunches. This bunch train must be brought intact through the injector [2], a phase space tailoring chicane, and the accelerator proper, into a spectrometer and beam dump. A beam loading compensation scheme [3] is used to achieve uniform acceleration in the structures, minimizing energy variation along the pulse as it travels through the steering and focusing lattice. As part of the beam instrumentation system of the NLCTA, six current monitoring toroids are incorporated at various locations along the beam line. These supplement the current information available from an insertable faraday cup and a series of beam position monitors. While the latter are more numerous, the current transmission data acquired from them consists of a scalar value reflecting only the charge density at the leading edge of the long beam pulse. The toroid pickups allow us to view the temporal structure of the beam current (above the bunching scale). By comparing signals at different locations, for example before and after the chicane, we can determine not only where we might be losing current but also from which part of the bunch train it is being lost. This is crucial as we test our beam loading compensation scheme. II. TRANSFORMER The heart of our beam current monitoring system is the toroidal Fast Current Transformer manufactured by Bergoz (01170 Crozet, France). Developed in collaboration with Klaus Unser at CERN, this device was designed specifically for viewing charged particle bunches in accelerators. The "rad-hard" model we use has an inner diameter of 1.1", slightly larger than our beam pipe. The azimuthal magnetic induction of the beam current links atwenty-turn coil around the toroid core, giving a 1:20 transformer ratio. The core of cobalt/molybdenum amorphous alloy ribbon interleaved with nickel/iron crystalline alloy was designed to optimize frequency response (~1ns rise time) and suppress ringing. Fifty ohms of resistance is embedded within the toroid and an SMA connector on the outer wall allows for signal pick- up. The basic circuit is illustrated in Figure 1 below. When connected to an oscilloscope with 50 Ω impedance, the transformer yields a nominal signal amplitude of VIIsigbeam beam turns= × +  = ×− 201 501 501 251 Ω ΩΩ. . 50 Ω20 turns Ibeamto 50 Ωcoax Figure 1. Circuit diagram for fast toroid current monitor. III. HOUSING In order for the transformer to "see" a net current passing through its center, the wall current imaging the charged particle beam must be diverted around the outside of the device. The beam pipe section and aluminum housing on which and in which the toroid is installed to achieve this end are shown in Figure 2 in a partly disassembled view. The electrical continuity of the beam pipe is thus interrupted by an inch-long insulating ceramic gap. A thin coating of kovar deposited on the inner surface of the ceramic provides a finite conductivity to bleed off any build-up of charge deposited by the beam. The edges of the ceramic are metalized and brazed to the beam pipe to maintain vacuum integrity, and a small bellows is included to either side of the gap to relieve stress. Around this structure, a mechanically engineered aluminum shell is assembled which supports the toroid and provides a conducting path for the wall current. The housing clamps to the steel beam pipe just beyond each bellows. An inner cylinder is brought into contact around the toroid, and an outer cylinder encloses some cabling, supports two cable connectors, and provides rigidity. Spring-loaded pins suspend the toroid around the ceramic. The transformer signal is brought through the innercylinder to an SMA-to-type N adapter in the outer shell. To the other type N connector is soldered a flat wire looping beween the toroid and the vacuum chamber. This can be pulsed to verify the operability of the current monitor. Figure 2. Toroid and housing installed on a beam pipe section with one quadrant of the housing removed. IV. READOUT The fast toroid signals are carried by low-loss heliax cables out from the accelerator enclosure to a rack near the klystron gallery. There they are fed through a high band- width multiplexer into a 250 MHz (1 gigasample/second) Hewlett Packard 1428a Digitizing Oscilloscope in a VXI crate. These instruments are controlled with an embedded, HPUX, multi-user processor, which is networked to a terminal in the NLCTA control room. The scope is run using an external trigger synched with the beam. Software routines written with HP VEE (Visual Engineering Environment) graphical programming language are used for sending commands, receiving digitized data, signal processing and display. V. CALIBRATION In an initial test of our toroid assembly in the SLC linac, the signal displayed significant ringing. This seems to have been due to capacitance and inductance in the circuit formed by our housing. To further study its response and try to ameliorate this effect, we fitted the current monitor with an aluminum rod center conductor supported between specially designed coaxial cable adapters, as shown in Figure 3./LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines pulse generator oscilloscopefast toroidpickup ceramic gap coax adapter housing center conductorbeam pipecablesBNC Figure 3. Beam current monitor test and calibration setup. An HP 8510C Network Analyzer connected between one port and the pickup, with a load on the other port, showed the response function of the current transformer to be fairly flat out to about 1.3 GHz, where it drops off 15 dB. This is consistent with the manufacturer's rise time specification. A variable width pulse generator and an oscilloscope were also used to study the device. Filling the cavity formed around the bellows with microwave absorber reduced the ringing from sharp pulses, but it was not considered suitable for permanent inclusion in a high radiation environment. What was found to improve the worst of our current monitors was the sanding down of spacers and application of silver paint to the edges of the inner cylinder halves to assure good electrical contact between them. To remove, as far as possible, any remaining imperfection in their response, each of our beam current monitors was calibrated in the following way. Electrical pulses were sent along the center conductor to simulate an electron beam. The transmitted pulses (essentially identical to the input pulses) and toroid pickup signals were recorded simultaneously with our two-channel digitizing scope. The Fourier transform of the latter waveform could then be divided by that of the former to give us the effect of the device on the true signal. Because the Fourier transform of a square pulse has nodes at intervals of the inverse width, a response function generated from a single such pulse yields spurious noise (division by nearly zero) at these frequencies. Attempts to correct a pulse of a different width with such a function causes gross distortions. It was thus necessary to use many pulses of various widths for each calibration, generally about fifteen ranging from 1 ns to greater than a microsecond. The digitized waveforms were eight microseconds long, yielding a spacing of 0.125 MHz in our frequency spectra. The FFT's of the throughsignals and those of the toroid signals were added before dividing the two sums. The resulting response functions were then stored in files. For any signal h t( ) recorded by the beam current monitor, a corrected signal f t( ) could thereafter be obtained with the stored file G( )ω from the relationship f t IFFTFFT h t G( )( ) ( )={ }  ω. For greater speed, it is sometimes preferable to run our current monitors without implementing this correction. A scalar factor, also determined with our coaxial setup, is then used to convert output voltage to axial current. A typical effect of using the fast Fourier transform correction is to decrease a ~7 ns rise time to ~6 ns. Signal droop is not significant for our pulse length. We measured the L/R time constant of the toroid to be as large as 35 microseconds. It should be noted that the performance of these current transformers deteriorates drastically in high magnetic fields (>~500 guass). In our injector, where the focusing solenoid field reaches two kilogauss, we had to substitute a homemade, 100 turn toroid on a G-10 core. VI. MEASUREMENTS As previously mentioned, the HP VEE programming software is used with our beam current monitoring system. Through its direct I/O capability, we select the desired current monitor or monitors from the multiplexer, set up the digitizing scope, and acquire waveforms. Thesignal processing we've encoded not only allows for the above FFT correction to be applied, but also performs a number of useful measurements on the pulses. These include beam current amplitude, pulse width, rise time, fall time, slope of the pulse top, rms variation across the pulse top from a linear fit, and integrated charge in the pulse. These measurements can be sent to the CORRELATIONS PLOT program in our control system and correlated with other variables. The waveforms and measurement results are displayed on a convenient user interface panel. We can run in one- shot or "live" mode. In the latter mode, the screen is updated automatically every few seconds (including time for data processing). A feedback loop adjusts the oscilloscope range according to the measured signal amplitude, and the two scope channels allow us to monitor two beam current signals simultaneously on the same display. Figure 4 shows our display panel with toroids before and after the chicane indicating about 77% beam transmission. VIII. REFERENCES [1]Ronald D. Ruth, "Results from the NLC Test Accelerator," these proceedings. [2]A. Yeremian, et al., "NLCTA Injector Experimental Results," these proceedings. [3]C. Adolphsen, et al., "Beam Loading Compensation in the NLCTA," these proceedings. Figure 4. Current monitor two-signal live display panel.
arXiv:physics/0007014 7 Jul 2000BEAM PROFILE MONITORS IN THE NLCTA * C. Nantista, C. Adolphsen, R.L. Brown, R. Fuller and J. Rifkin Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, P.O. Box 4349, Stanford, California 94309, USA Abstract The transverse current profile in the Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator (NLCTA) electron beam can be monitored at several locations along the beam line by means of profile monitors. These consist of insertable phosphor screens, light collection and transport systems, CID cameras, a frame-grabber, and PC and VAX based image analysis software. In addition to their usefulness in tuning and steering the accelerator, the profile monitors are utilized for emittance measurement. A description of these systems and their performance is presented. I. INTRODUCTION Among the devices which comprise the beam instrumentation system of the Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator [1] at SLAC are eight beam profile monitors: one near the gun, one between the injector sections, one each before, in the middle of, and after the chicane, one after the main accelerator, and one at each of the two dumps. Along with four wire scanners, these profile monitors allow us to view the transverse charge distribution of the electron beam at various positions along the beam line. They are of great utility for monitoring beam shape, verifying transmission, and, in the high dispersion region of the chicane and spectrometer, measuring energy spread in the long bunch train [2],[3]. In addition, they are employed in data acquisition for beam emittance and TWISS parameter measurement. II. SCREEN The screens used in our profile monitors are of the same type used in the SLC [4]. They are fabricated from aluminum, to which is bound a fine-grained surface layer of Gd O S:Tb2 2 . This coating phosphoresces with a decay time of about a millisecond where the incident electron beam deposits energy. The light emitted per unit area is proportional to the charge passing through the screen. They are supported on pneumatic vacuum feedthroughs which allow them to be retracted from the beam pipe volume when not in use. When a screen is inserted, its surface makes an angle of 45o with the beam line axis so that it can be viewed through a vertical view port. A pattern of holes drilled in the screen allows for image dimensions to be calibrated. For most screens, this is a rectangular frame with seven holes horizontally and five vertically. The horizontal and projected vertical hole spacing is 1.5 mm. The last three * Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE- AC03-76SF00515.profile monitors have larger screens with a different hole pattern. irislensmirror mirror lamp lead boxphosphor screen beam pipeview portmotor pneumatic vacuum feedthroughbeam side viewscreen /LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines mirrorcamera zoom lens side view/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines /LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines/LiteDiagLines Figure 1. Profile monitor optics diagram. III. OPTICS An optical system is employed to distance the camera from the high radiation levels produced by the beam, particularly when incident on the screen. The layout of our optical elements is illustrated in Figure 1. They include three flat optical mirrors, an adjustable iris, and a three-inch, 350 mm focal length imaging lens. The image magnification is set close to unity to minimize aberration. The camera is placed a couple of feet off to the side of and below the beamline and is shielded by an enclosure of lead bricks supported by a steel frame. The amount of light entering the camera is adjusted by means of a remotely controlled motor connected to the iris. Also remotely controllable is a lamp aimed through a second window in the vacuum chamber. This allows us to illuminate the screen in order to view the hole pattern and calibrate the x and y scales of the received image. Illumination is also needed while manually aligning the optical elements and focusing the image. IV. CAMERA The camera used in our profile monitors is the CID2250D manufactured by CIDTEC, a 30 Hz, solid state, CID (charge injection device), monochrome video camera. The designation “CID” refers to the fact that aftereach frame is read out from the sensor, the charge on its MOS capacitor array is injected into a substrate. It is rated for fifty times longer life than CCD (charge coupled device) cameras in an ionizing radiation environment and is much more "neutron-hard". The sensor is a 59 square millimeter surface containing 512 ×512 pixel capacitors with 0.015 mm spacing. Its sensitivity and range can be adjusted by setting the gain and offset voltage. The camera is fitted with a close-up zoom lens which is focused on the screen image formed several centimeters away. A long, special cable connects the palm-sized camera body to a camera control unit (CCU) outside of the shielded accelerator housing. V. FRAME-GRABBER / TIMING SIGNALS Each of the eight CCU's is connected via two coaxial cables through a multiplexer and some electronics into a frame-grabber in the NLCTA control room. For the latter we employ Data Translation's Fidelity 200 Flexible Frame Processor board installed in an Industrial Computer Source 90 MHz PC. Figure 2 shows a diagram of our profile monitor signal processing system. DelayGate Gen.FRAMELINEVIDEOFRAME GRABBER int. pixel clock A B Andinv.in rack NIMTTL 2 Gates: 63.5 us < G1 < 33.3 ms D1 = 1.066 us 63.5 us < G2 < 33.3 ms G2 < G3 < 33.3 ms G2+D1 < G4 < 33.3 ms - G3/FRVIDEO EOL NIM TTLPDU STB 30Hz 10HzGate Gen. 41 Gate Gen. 3A B AndNIM TTL1(Camera)CCU EOFM U X Gate Gen. Figure 2. Timing signal electronics. The frame-grabber operates on three timing signals: pixel clock, end-of-line, and end-of-frame. Using the board's internal oscillator for the pixel clock was found to eliminate a line-to-line image jitter problem. The end-of- line signal, output by the camera control units, is brought in through one of the coax cables. The other cable carries the raw video signal. To avoid stringing more cables than necessary, and because our multiplexer only switches two signals, we worked out a way to run without bringing the CCU's end-of-frame (EOF) signal into the frame-grabber, as described below. A third coax cable, daisy chained to all of the CCU's from the control room, carries to them a 30 Hz frame-reset signal to synchronize the cameras with the accelerator timing system. The CCU's output end-of-frame signal is locked to its first end-of-line pulse after the leading edge of the frame reset. We can produce the same signal in the control room by combining the frame reset and incomingend-of-line signals in a NIM logic unit. This process is illustrated in Figure 3. A time delay reflectometer was used to determine the round-trip travel time between the control room and the CCU, so that the delayed frame reset pulse would select the proper end-of-line pulse. The necessary components are shown in light gray in the diagram of Figure 2. Frame Reset (30 Hz) Gate Generated FRAME In/FR EOLEnd of Frame Out (not used)End of Line Out (LINE In) V Figure 3. Generation of end-of-frame signal. The cameras must operate at 30 Hz. However, in NLCTA operation, the beam repetition rate is generally 10 Hz. The resulting strobe effect in the video image can be annoying and gives one only a one third probability of capturing a beam image on each try. The following procedure was therefore incorporated. We take a 10 Hz trigger identical to that driving the electron gun from the same PDU (Programmable Delay Unit) that gives us our 30 Hz trigger. We expand this with a gate generator and combine it in a logic unit with our constructed end-of- frame signal. Since the latter has been slightly delayed, the effect is to pass every third end-of-frame pulse, as illustrated in Figure 4. When the frame-grabber is then given this signal and told to expect 10 Hz video, this is all that it digitizes, despite the fact that the camera is sending thirty frames per second. This is accomplished by the unshaded components in Figure 2. BEAM Trigger (10 Hz) End of Frame (constructed) (30 Hz) NIM GATE 1 2 (EOF In) 1 2V Figure 4. Reduction of end-of-frame frequency to 10 Hz. VI. SOFTWARE In conjunction with the Fidelity 200 frame-grabber card, we use Data Translation’s GLOBAL LAB Imagesoftware, running in Microsoft Windows for Workgroups. This image processing and analysis package has many features. It configures the frame-grabber for our camera model. It displays live video or captures single frames, which can be saved as TIFF format image files. It can plot the pixel values along any slice of an image selected by dragging a line. It also allows the user to program scripts to perform desired sequences of operations. Unfortunately, GLOBAL LAB Image seems not to have been designed with beam physicists in mind. It cannot readily do such things as projections, curve fits, and contour plots. One can expand its capabilities by writing additional C-code. However, for our purposes, it was preferable to FTP beam images to the SLC VAX and analyze them there, when desired, with our own code written in MATLAB. This code subtracts the baseline from the image array, displays 2-D contour plots, projects the pixel values onto the x and/or y axis, and fits gaussian curves to determine the beam sigmas. An example beam spot is shown in Figure 5. Its projections, along with gaussian fits, are shown in Figure 6. Figure 5. Beamspot image. VII. EMITTANCE MEASUREMENT The beam physics program of the NLCTA makes it desireable to be able to measure the beam emittance, as well as how well matched the beam is to the lattice. This is done with our profile monitors using to the general procedure described by Ross, et al. [5]. To measure horizontal beam phase space, for example, the CORRELATIONS PLOT program in our controls software is used to step a horizontally focusing quadrupole magnet upstream of the chosen profile monitor through seven field strengths about the nominal value. At each step, a trigger is sent to our frame-grabber, and GLOBAL LAB Image stores the beam image to disk. These images are then transfered from PC to VAX, and their gaussian spacial distribution sigmas in the relevant dimension are determined. These are related to the beam sigma matrix at the screen by σ σ112=x. MATLAB Figure 6. Projections and gaussian fits (dashed). then reads in the quadrupole name and field values from the CORRELATIONS PLOT output and gets the tranfer matrix between the quadrupole and the profile monitor from the online database, as well as the beam energy. A parabola is fit to a plot of σx2 vs. quadrupole strength. From its three coefficients and the transfer matrix, we can determine the 2 2× sigma matrix at the quadrupole. The emittance and TWISS parameters then follow from ε σ β σ σ α σ σ= = = −det det and det , , .11 12 Using further transfer matrix information from our model, we can "swim" this beam ellipse upstream and calculate the mismatch at the accelerator input, characterized by Bmag= + + −      1 22 β ββ βαβ βαβ β* **** , where the asterisked parameters are the measured values and the others the design values. REFERENCES [1] Ronald D. Ruth, "Results From the NLC Test Accelerator," these proceedings. [2]A. Yeremian, et al., "NLCTA Injector Experimental Results," these proceedings. [3]C. Adolphsen, et al., "Beam Loading Compensation in the NLCTA," these proceedings. [4]M.C. Ross, et al., "High Resolution Beam Profile Monitors in the SLC," proceedings of the 1985 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, May 13-16, 1985; SLAC-PUB-3640. [5]M.C. Ross, et al., "Automated Emittance Measurements in the SLC," proceedings of the 1987 Particle Accelerator Conference, Washington, D.C., March 16-19, 1987; SLAC-PUB-4278.
arXiv:physics/0007015v1 [physics.comp-ph] 7 Jul 2000Improved eﬃciency with variational Monte Carlo using two le vel sampling Mark Dewing Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illin ois 61801∗ Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Ch ampaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (Dated: February 2, 2008) A two level sampling method is applied to variational Monte C arlo (VMC) that samples the one and two body parts of the wave function separately. The metho d is demonstrated on a single Li 2 molecule in free space and 32 H 2molecules in a periodic box. This simple modiﬁcation increa ses the eﬃciency of a VMC simulation by up to 72%. Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) [1] is an eﬀective method for computing the ground state properties of atoms, [2, 3] molecules, [4, 5] and solids. [6, 7, 8, 9] Ex- plicitly including the electron correlation into the wave function allows VMC to recover a large percentage of the correlation energy, typically 70-90% (or more for small atoms and molecules). [2, 4, 10] VMC computes matrix elements with respect to the square of a trial wave function, ψ. The most common matrix element is the energy, E=/integraltext dR ψ2(R;a)EL(R;a)/integraltext dR ψ2(R;a)(1) whereEL=1 ψHψ. The variational principle states that this energy will be greater than or equal to the true ground state energy for any ψ. Typically, the wave func- tion is parameterized and those parameters are varied until a minimum energy [10] (or alternatively, minimum variance [2, 8]) is reached. The Metropolis method [11] constructs a transition probability, P(s′→s), for use in a Markov process. The result of that process is the desired normalized probabil- ity distribution. A correct transition probability can be constructed by satisfying detailed balance, π(s)P(s→s′) =π(s′)P(s′→s) (2) whereπ(s) is the desired probability distribution ( ψ2(R) for VMC ). In the generalized Metropolis method, the transition probability is split into two pieces, an a pri- orisampling distribution, T(s→s′) and an acceptance probability A(s→s′). The original Metropolis method generates a trial move, R′, of one particle inside a box of side ∆ centered about the old position, R. This leads to a constant Tinside the box and zero outside. The trial move is then accepted or rejected with probability A= min/bracketleftbigg 1,ψ2(R′) ψ2(R)/bracketrightbigg (3) ∗Electronic address: m-dewin@uiuc.eduIn electronic problems, a typical wave function is ψ=De−U(4) whereDis the product of spin up and spin down Slater determinants of single particle orbitals and Uis the two (or higher) body Jastrow factor. This latter part contains the explicit electron-electron correlation. A simulation step consists of a trial move of every elec- tron. Each trial move is accepted or rejected according to Eq (3). A single electron is moved at a time, which only changes one column of the Slater matrix. By saving and using the inverse of this matrix, computing the new de- terminant and its derivatives is an O(N) operation. [12] If the move is accepted, the inverse matrix can be up- dated with O(N2) operations. (Note that computing the determinant directly is of order O(N3).) A smaller ac- ceptance ratio will be faster, since fewer updates need to be performed. Multilevel sampling has been used extensively in path integral Monte Carlo. [13] In multilevel sampling, the wave function is split into several factors (levels), and an accept/reject step is performed after computing each factor. The entire wave function is computed only if there is an acceptance after every factor. Rejections will make the overall algorithm faster, since not all the factors need to be computed. For VMC it is natural to use two factors - the single body part, D, as one factor and the two body part,e−U, as the other. The single body part is the cheaper of the two to compute, so computing it ﬁrst will give the greatest reduction in time. The two level sampling algorithm for VMC proceeds as follows. A trial move, R′, is proposed and accepted at the ﬁrst stage with probability A1= min/bracketleftbigg 1,D2(R′) D2(R)/bracketrightbigg (5) If accepted at the ﬁrst stage, the two body part is computed and the trial move is accepted with probability A2= min/bracketleftbigg 1,exp [−2U(R′)] exp [−2U(R)]/bracketrightbigg (6) It can be veriﬁed by substitution that these satisfy de- tailed balance in Eq. (2). After an acceptance at this2 second level, the inverse Slater matrices are updated as described previously. The ﬁgure of merit for these simulations is the eﬃ- ciency ξ=1 σ2T(7) whereTis the computer time and σis the error estimate of the average of some property such as the energy. Maximum eﬃciency results from a competition be- tween two eﬀects. The ﬁrst is that a lower acceptance ratio will yield a lower run time and a larger eﬃciency. The second is serial correlations. A lower acceptance ra- tio will give a longer correlation time, hence a larger error and lower eﬃciency. In maximizing the eﬃciency, the obvious parameter to adjust is the step size, ∆. But the number of steps be- tween computations of ELcan also be adjusted. The Metropolis algorithm produces correlated state points, so successive samples of ELdon’t contain much new in- formation. It is advantageous to compute ELevery few steps rather than every step. In this work the local en- ergy was computed every 5 steps. The algorithm is demonstrated using a Li 2molecule in free space and a collection of 32 H 2molecules in a peri-odic box. The wave functions, which are the Ψ III’s from Reynolds, et al., [14] use a simple electron-electron and electron-nuclear Jastrow term, and use ﬂoating Gaus- sians for the orbitals. The hydrogen molecules were in box of side 19.344 atomic units ( rs= 3.0). The results for the diﬀerent sampling methods for the Li2molecule are given in Tables I and II. The second level acceptance ratio is quite high, indicating the single body part is a good approximation to the whole wave function. The eﬃciency is also shown in Figure 1. The results for the diﬀerent sampling methods for the H2molecules are given in Tables III and IV. The eﬃ- ciency is also shown in Figure 2. Comparing the maximum eﬃciency for each sampling method, two level sampling is 39% more eﬃcient than the standard sampling for Li 2, and 72% more eﬃcient for 32 H 2’s. More complicated schemes using more levels or diﬀer- ent splittings of the wave function could be devised. This particular scheme is attractive because it uses quantities readily available in a VMC computation, and requires minimal modiﬁcation to existing VMC sampling algo- rithms. This work has been supported by the computational facilities at NCSA and by NSF grant DMR 98-02373. [1] W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. 138, 442 (1965). [2] K. E. Schmidt and J. W. Moskowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 4172 (1990). [3] C. J. Umrigar, K. G. Wilson, and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1719 (1988). [4] C. Filippi and C. J. Umrigar, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 213 (1996). [5] C. J. Umrigar, in Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Physics and Chemistry , Vol. 525 of Nato Science Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences , edited by M. P. Nightingale and C. J. Umrigar (Kluwer Academic, Dor- drecht, The Netherlands, 1999), pp. 129–160. [6] S. Fahy, X. W. Wang, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 42, 3503 (1990). [7] S. Fahy, in Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Physics and Chemistry , Vol. 525 of Nato Science Series C: Math-ematical and Physical Sciences , edited by M. P. Nightin- gale and C. J. Umrigar (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999), pp. 101–127. [8] A. J. Williamson et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 9640 (1996). [9] B. Kr´ alik, P. Delaney, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4253 (1998). [10] X. Lin, H. Zhang, and A. M. Rappe, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2650 (2000). [11] N. Metropolis et al., J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953). [12] D. M. Ceperley, G. V. Chester, and M. H. Kalos, Phys. Rev. B 16, 3081 (1977). [13] D. M. Ceperley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 279 (1995). [14] P. J. Reynolds, D. M. Ceperley, B. J. Alder, and W. A. Lester, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 5593 (1982).3 TABLE I: Timings for Li 2molecule using the standard sam- pling method. All times in seconds on an SGI Origin 2000. Acceptance Determinant Jastrow Total ∆ Ratio Time Time Time ξ 1.0 0.610 48.3 340 516 1190 1.5 0.491 48.1 340 508 1680 2.0 0.407 48.2 340 503 1460 2.5 0.349 48.2 339 499 1070 3.0 0.307 48.2 339 496 800 TABLE II: Timings for Li 2molecule using the two level sam- pling method. All times in seconds on an SGI Origin 2000. First Level Second Level Total Acc. ∆ Acc. Ratio Acc. Ratio Ratio Time ξ 1.0 0.674 0.899 0.606 400 1580 1.5 0.543 0.894 0.485 347 2430 2.0 0.447 0.897 0.401 304 2340 2.5 0.379 0.902 0.342 276 1910 3.0 0.331 0.906 0.300 256 1400 TABLE III: Timings for 32 H 2molecules in a periodic box using the standard sampling method. All times in seconds on a Sun Ultra 5. Acceptance Determinant Jastrow Total ∆ Ratio Time Time Time ξ 2.0 0.606 167 1089 2015 0.61 3.0 0.455 167 1085 1891 1.22 4.0 0.338 166 1084 1794 1.23 5.0 0.250 166 1080 1722 1.06 6.0 0.185 164 1080 1668 1.02 7.0 0.139 162 1084 1629 0.76 TABLE IV: Timings for 32 H 2molecules in a periodic box using the two level sampling method. All times in seconds on a Sun Ultra 5. First Level Second Level Total Acc. Total ∆ Acc. Ratio Acc. Ratio Ratio Time ξ 2.0 0.740 0.795 0.589 1804 0.59 3.0 0.598 0.728 0.436 1421 1.77 4.0 0.468 0.681 0.319 1185 2.11 5.0 0.357 0.649 0.232 994 1.55 6.0 0.370 0.627 0.169 849 1.87 7.0 0.204 0.609 0.124 740 1.464 80012001600200024002800 11.5 22.5 3ξ ∆standard sampling two level sampling FIG. 1: Eﬃciency of VMC for Li 2. 0.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2 234567ξ ∆standard sampling two level sampling FIG. 2: Eﬃciency of VMC for 32 H 2molecules.
arXiv:physics/0007016v1 [physics.atom-ph] 8 Jul 2000Eﬀective ATI channels in high harmonic generation M. Yu. Kuchiev and V. N. Ostrovsky∗ School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney 205 2, Australia Abstract Harmonic generation by an atom in a laser ﬁeld is described by the three-step mechanism as proceeding via above-threshold ionization (A TI) followed by the electron propagation in the laser-dressed continuum and th e subsequent laser assisted recombination (LAR). An amplitude of harmonic pro duction is given by the coherent sum of contributions from diﬀerent intermed iate ATI channels labeled by the number mof absorbed laser photons. The range of m-values that gives substantial contribution is explored and found t o be rather broad for high harmonic generation. The coherence eﬀects are of cr ucial importance being responsible for the characteristic pattern of harmon ic intensities with aplateau domain followed by a cutoﬀ region. Due to multiphoton nature of the process, an eﬃcient summation of m-contributions can be carried out in the framework of the saddle point method. The saddle points c orrespond to some complex-valued labels m=mcassociated with the intermediate eﬀective ATI channels in the three-step harmonic generation process. The advanta ge of this approach stems from the fact that summation over larg e number of conventional ATI m-channels is replaced by summation over small number of eﬀective mc-channels. The equation governing mchas a transparent physical meaning: the electron ejected from the atom on the ﬁrst (ATI) stage should return to the core to make LAR possible. The eﬀective channel labels mmove along characteristic trajectories in the complex plane as t he system param- eters vary. In the cutoﬀ region of the harmonic spectrum a sin gle eﬀective channel contributes. For lower harmonics, in the plateau do main, two eﬀec- tive ATI channels become essential. The interference of the ir contributions leads to oscillatory pattern in the harmonic generation rat es. The calculated rates are in good agreement with the results obtained by othe r approaches. PACS numbers: 32.80.-t, 42.65.Ky, 32.80.Rm, 32.80.Wr Typeset using REVT EX 1I. INTRODUCTION A. Three-step mechanism of HHG High eﬃciency of various processes in strong laser ﬁeld coul d be understood basing on the observation that the ﬁeld-induced quiver motion supplies an electron with high instantaneous energy. Rescattering of the energetic electron on atomic co re generally is accompanied by the energy exchange between electron, core and electromagn etic ﬁeld. In particular, the core could be excited or ionized [double ionization (DI) of a n atom] and the high-energy photons could be emitted. The latter process is known as the h armonic generation (HG). If one considers the active electron initially bound to the cor e, then the electron at ﬁrst should be (virtually) released to the quasi-free state, as a precon dition that the subsequent events listed above become possible. As a whole, this constitutes three-step mechanism comprising above-threshold ionization (ATI), propagation in laser-d ressed continuum and the ﬁnal step which is electron-atom impact in case of rescattering, core excitation or ionization, or laser assisted recombination (LAR) in case of HG process. Strong i nteraction between the receding electron and the core is omitted in the standard Keldysh [1] m odel of multiphoton ionization. Its importance was ﬁrst pointed out by Kuchiev [2], who had pr edicted several phenomena where the electron-core interaction plays a crucial role. T he related mechanism was named “atomic antenna” to stress the role of active electron in gaining energy from l aser ﬁeld. Speciﬁcally for HG the three-step model was promoted in the h ybrid classical-quantum framework by Corkum [3], see also the papers by Kulander et al [4,5]. The subsequent theoretical developments were based on more sophisticated approaches and led to important advancements [6–11], albeit the three-step nature of the HG process was somewhat veiled in these formulations. Most clearly the three-step mechani sm is exposed in the framework offactorization method developed in Ref. [12,13] as an implementation of ide a of atomic antenna of Ref. [2] and applied to DI process. This technique allows one to present quantum amplitude as a direct sum over contributions of intermediat e ATI channels. The application to HG process worked out by Kuchiev and Ostrovsky [14,15] qua ntitatively demonstrated validity and power of this approach. Since this development is the starting point of the present study, we brieﬂy summarize it in Sec. IB below. The intermediate ATI channels form a discrete set being labe led by a number mof absorbed photons. Generally speaking, entire manifold of m-channels contributes to the rate of three-step process under consideration. One can ant icipate that actually only some eﬀective m-range should be essential, but this issue has not been inves tigated previously. Another important question arises from the fact that contri butions to the rate of three- step process from diﬀerent ATI channels are to be summed cohe rently. How essential are coherence eﬀects in reality remained unclear. The acuteness of this problem i s enhanced in view of recent publications by Becker and Faisal [16–18] whe re semiempirical formula with incoherent summation is suggested in application to the DI process. In the present paper we address these problems considering H G as the most simple three- step event. Being sharply important in itself, it hopefully provides a useful testground for other, more complicated processes. Our study shows that the range of eﬃciently contributing m-channels is rather broad (Sec. II). It is deﬁned by interpla y of two factors characterizing eachm-channel contribution: the well known ATI amplitude (Appen dix A) and much less 2investigated LAR amplitude (Appendix B). Importantly, the phases of these amplitudes play a major role, showing that the coherence eﬀects are crucial. In particular, solely these eﬀects are responsible for the well-known rapid fall-oﬀ of HG rates beyond the so called plateau domain. At once this ﬁnding provokes a new question: how one c an simplify summation over broad range of essential intermediate m-channels. We achieve this objective (Sec. III) by introducing a concept of eﬀective ATI channels , or more brieﬂy, eﬀective channels (EC). Each EC is characterized by a complex-valued channel label mc, i.e. a complex-valued number of absorbed photons. The latter is deﬁned from the equation wit h simple and appealing physical meaning. The summation over a large number of intermediate m-channels is replaced by summation over very small number of EC (usually one or two). I n the higher part of harmonic spectrum, beyond cutoﬀ, it is suﬃcient to take into account a single EC. Two EC provide description of the plateau domain, including int ricate oscillatory interference pattern of HG rates. As shown in Sec. IV, EC approximation ens ures good quantitative agreement with the harmonic intensities obtained within ot her approaches [11,14,15]. As the system parameters vary, the EC labels mcmove along characteristic trajectories in the complex- mplane. This pattern condensedly expresses theoretical bac kground of HG process in various regimes. For instance, transition betwe en the regimes of one and two EC, i.e., between the cutoﬀ and plateau domains, corresponds to “collision” of two trajectories in the complex plane. The oscillatory behaviour of HG rate in th e plateau domain is explained by interference of two ECs. Thus ECs provide a uniﬁed framewo rk for qualitative assessment of three-step processes as well as for their quantitative de scription. Probably the nearest analogy for this theoretical tool comprise the well-known R egge poles [19], i.e., the states with complex-valued angular momentum, that give an eﬀectiv e description in the quantum scattering theory. B. Direct implementation of three-step mechanism in theory Now it is worthwhile to look in more detail how the three-step mechanism of HG is implemented in the theory of Refs. [14,15]. The key formula f or the amplitude of N-th harmonic generation, d+ N= 2/summationdisplay md+ Nm, (1.1a) d+ Nm=Am µ0(Km)BN mµ 0(Km), (1.1b) presents it as a sum where each term is a product of two amplitu des of physical, fully accom- plished and observable processes; no “oﬀ-shell” entities appear. The ﬁrst step is described by the ﬁrst factor Am µ0(Km) which is an amplitude of physical ATI process when after ab- sorption of mlaser photons the active electron acquires a translational momentum p=Km; see detailed description of this amplitude within the Keldy sh-type approach in Appendix A. The other factor, BN mµ 0(Km), is a combined amplitude of the second and third steps , i.e., propagation and laser assisted recombination (PLAR) amplitude. Under an additional approximation it can be factorized into propagation (expan sion) factor 1 /Rmµ0describing thesecond step and the amplitude of the third step , LAR, CNm(Km): BN mµ 0(Km) =1 Rmµ0CNm(Km). (1.2) 3Rmµ0is merely an approximate expression for the distance passed by the active electron in course of its laser-induced wiggling motion, see Refs. [1 2,14,15] and formula (3.13c) be- low. The amplitude CNm(Km) of the physical LAR process describes recombination, i.e. , transition of electron with momentum Kmfrom the continuum to bound state. Since the continuum state is laser-dressed, the recombining electro n can emit the N-th harmonic pho- ton, gaining necessary extra energy from the laser ﬁeld. The formulas for LAR and PLAR amplitudes can be found in the Appendix B. The summation in formula (1.1) runs over a number of photons mabsorbed on the ﬁrst step. Thus in the laser-dressed continuum the energy conser vation constraint selects the discrete set of ATI channels, where the electron has a transl ational momentum Km. These channels serve as intermediate states for the three-step HG process. To specify exactly, theabsolute value of the electron momentum in m-th ATI channel is deﬁned by the energy conservation constraint in ATI as Km=/radicalBig 2 (mω−Up+Ea). (1.3) where Ea=−1 2κ2is electron energy in the initial bound state, Up≡F2/(4ω2) is the well- known ponderomotive potential, ω= 2π/Tis the laser frequency, Tis the period, Fis the electric vector in the linear-polarized laser wave. ATI can play role of the ﬁrst stage of HG process only if the electron momentum has speciﬁc direction , namely Kmis directed alongF. This ensures eventual electron return to the core that make s the ﬁnal step, LAR, possible as discussed in detail in Refs. [12,14,15]. It is wo rthwhile to indicate once again that our approach presumes the single active electron appro ximation; the atomic units are used throughout the paper unless indicated otherwise. The o bservable HG rates RNare expressed via the amplitudes as RN≡ω3N3 2πc3/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled+ N/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2, (1.4) Ω =Nωis the frequency of emitted harmonic, cis the velocity of light. As already mentioned, the general framework for three-step decomposition of complicated laser-induced processes is provided by factorization tech nique of Ref. [12]. The accuracy of this theoretical device is governed by multiphoton nature o f the processes: the larger is number of laser quanta involved, the more accurate results i t provides. To avoid confusion, it should be emphasized that the factorization is not related to the conventional perturbation theory, or to its simpliﬁed version known as the pole approxi mation. Here we only brieﬂy outline some features of the derivation [ 12,14,15] necessary for understanding of the present development. The basic expres sion for the HG amplitudes contains integration over two time variables, tandt′. The factorization technique allowed us to disentangle these integrations basing on the adiabati c approach. Mathematically the latter implies the saddle point approximation for calculat ing the integrals which emerge when a particular representation for the Green function in t erms of intermediate states is chosen. The saddle point integration over time variable t′is intrinsic for the factorization technique, whereas another time integration could be carri ed without approximations, for instance, numerically. The latter approach was adopted in R efs. [14,15] and in Sec. II of the present paper. However, EC approximation implies saddl e point integration also over time variable t. The details could be found in Appendices A and B. Here we only indicate 4physical meaning of the emerging saddle points. For t′variable the saddle point t′ mµ0, being given by Eq. (A7), is the instant of time when the electron is e mitted into an intermediate ATI channel. The saddle point in t-integral, tN mµ, see Eq. (B13), is the time of laser-assisted recombination of electron with the core, accompanied by emi ssion of high-energy photon. Note that generally both t′ mµ0andtN mµare complex-valued. Formula (1.1) is important conceptually being the most dire ct and fully quantum de- scription of the three-step mechanism of HG. It can serve als o as a practical computational tool. The latter statement was testiﬁed by a very good quanti tative agreement between cal- culations of HG rates by formulae (1.1), (1.4) [14,15] and th e benchmark results by Becker et al[11] for HG by H−ion. However, as discussed in Sec. IA, it was not explored bef ore what is the range of channel label mthat gives substantial contribution to the rate. This problem is addressed in Sec. II where we show that a rather lar ge number of intermedi- ate ATI channels is to be taken into account. The eﬀective sum mation method of Sec. III transforms sum (1.1a) over large number of m-terms to the sum over very small number (one or two) of EC terms. The illustrative applications of EC approach in Sec. IV serve to demonstrate its reliability. EC representation is conve nient also for analysis of general features of HG spectrum. The latter is known to consist of thr ee parts. The initial rapid decrease is followed by the plateau domain and the rapid cutoﬀ region. Being interested in the generation of rather high harmonics, we do not consider b elow the initial low- Npart of the spectrum. The upper boundary Nbof the plateau is given by the known expression [4,5,7,11] Nbω=1 2κ2+ 3.17Up. (1.5) In Sec. IIIC we show how this important result follows from th e three-step mechanism cast in the EC form. Section V contains concluding discussion. II. COMPOSITION OF HG AMPLITUDE FROM ATI CONTRIBUTIONS Representation (1.1) of HG amplitudes d+ Nas a sum over ATI contributions is character- ized by a number of interesting features. We illustrate them by Fig. 1 where diﬀerent terms in the sum (1.1a) are quantitatively presented for HG by H−ion in the laser ﬁeld with the frequency ω= 0.0043 and the intensity I= 1011W/cm2. We show separately the squared moduli and phases for the ATI amplitude Am µ0(open squares), PLAR amplitude BN mµ 0 (open triangles) and the resulting term in the sum (1.1a) d+ Nm(closed circles) in dependence onmfor some representative values of the harmonic order N. Namely, N= 15,25 lie in the plateau domain of HG spectrum whereas N= 39,51 are in the cutoﬀ region. Only open intermediate ATI channels are included in summation (1.1a) that in the present case means m≥16. The following observations could be made. •The number of m-terms giving substantial contribution to the sum (1.1a) is essentially independent of Nbeing about 15 in the example under consideration. •The domain of mgiving substantial contribution is deﬁned, ﬁrst, by the mon otonous decrease of \|Am µ0\|2withmthat ensures eﬀective cut-oﬀ from the high- mside. The 5second factor \|BN mµ 0\|2has more complicated behavior. Indeed, it oscillates with m and has substantial magnitude in the much broader range of mthan\|Am µ0\|2(this issue is discussed in more detail in the Appendix B). In HG process i t is important that for high harmonic order Nthe factor \|BN mµ 0\|2is strongly suppressed in the low- mregion (i.e. near ATI threshold, see Figs. 1c,d). Therefore, as Nincreases, the domain of important contributions to the sum shifts to higher m. •Typical values of the modulus squared components/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled+ Nm/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2decrease with the harmonic order Nincreasing. This is explained by decrease in the typical val ues of the \|BN mµ 0\|2 factor (note that \|Am µ0\|2does not depend on N). Importantly, this relatively slow decrease cannot explain the cutoﬀ in the spectrum of modulus squared amplitudes/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled+ N/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2. For instance, as Nvaries from 39 to 51 the typical values of/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled+ Nm/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2decrease only by a factor about 3, whereas the resulting/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled+ N/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/summationtext md+ Nm/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2decreases by seven orders of magnitude ! This clearly indicates that the high- Ncutoﬀ of HG rate is due to the strong cancellation of terms in the sum (1.1a), i.e. that the coherence or phase eﬀects are crucial. •The plots of the phases show that arg ( Am µ0) decreases with mwhereas arg ( BN mµ 0) increases. The resulting phase arg/parenleftBig d+ Nm/parenrightBig = arg ( Am µ0) + arg ( BN mµ 0) grows with m rather rapidly. For larger Nvariation of phases becomes faster. For instance, in the caseN= 51 the phase arg/parenleftBig d+ Nm/parenrightBig increases by about 10 πalong the substantial m- domain (20 < m < 35). Namely the rapid phase variation governs cancellation s in the sum (1.1a) and rapid decrease of the HG rates in the fall-oﬀ re gion. The rapid variation of phases is generally characteristic f or the semiclassical dynamics. Therefore one can suggest that in our problem some semiclass ical-type method of summation over ATI contributions could be developed that reﬂects the p hysics of the process. This program is implemented in the next section. III. EFFECTIVE ATI CHANNELS A. Poisson summation of ATI channel contributions Further in the basic formula (1.1) we employ for both ATI and P LAR amplitudes the saddle-point approximation given by formulas (A2) and (B9) , respectively. This representa- tion possesses important advantage of explicitly exposing large phases of amplitudes which are of crucial signiﬁcance in coherent summation as reveale d in previous section. The phase factors have form of exponents of classical action for the AT I and LAR processes. By using these expressions we present the HG amplitude (1.1) as d+ N= 2/summationdisplay m/summationdisplay µQmµexp/bracketleftBig −iS/parenleftBig tmµ, t′ mµ0/parenrightBig/bracketrightBig . (3.1) Bearing in mind importance of phase factors we write down the m explicitly in Eq. (3.1), introducing 6S(t, t′) =S(t)−S(t′) + Ωt=1 2/integraldisplayt t′dτ /parenleftBigg Km+F ωsinωτ/parenrightBigg2 −Ea + Ωt , (3.2) whereas all the rest is collected in the pre-exponential fac torQmµ: Qmµ=−ω4 2πAaΓ(1 + ν/2) 2ν/2κνYlmaz(ˆpµ0)1 F/parenleftBig cosωt′m µ0−cosωtm µ/parenrightBig× ×˜φ(ǫ) a/parenleftBigg −Km−F ωsinωtmµ/parenrightBigg1/radicalBig S′′(t′ mµ0)ν+1S′′(tmµ). (3.3) S(t, t′) has an appealing meaning of action for HG processes express ed as a sum of actions for constituent ATI and LAR processes. From the pragmatic point of view the attractive feature of th e sum representations (1.1) or (3.1) is obvious: each term in the sum has a clear and simple analytical expression, that helps greatly in numerical calculations. However, since th e number of essential terms in the sum is large, as discussed in Sec. II, the behavior of the sum m ay diﬀer drastically from behavior of its individual terms. This makes diﬃcult an inte rpretation of the results which follow from (1.1) or (3.1).To overcome this disadvantage it is highly desirable to ﬁnd some other representation for the amplitude which would be devoi d of extended summations. One can obtain guideline for practical implementation of this i dea by recalling the fact that sum- mation in (1.1) or (3.1) runs over the spectrum of intermediate ATI states. From the general physical principles we know that when the spectrum covers a b road range of energies it could be advantageous to work within the time-dependent pic ture. Mathematically this im- plies the Fourier transformation which replaces the spectr al quantities mωwith appropriate intervals of time. Having these arguments in mind, we carry out the Poisson summ ation in (3.1) that could be looked at as desired “Fourier transformation” d+ N= 2∞/summationdisplay j=−∞/integraldisplay∞ −∞dm/summationdisplay µQmµexp/bracketleftBig −iS/parenleftBig tmµ, t′ mµ0/parenrightBig −2πijm/bracketrightBig . (3.4) Transition from (3.1) to (3.4) amounts to replacing summati on over the integer mby in- tegration over related continuous variable. The price is in troducing an extra (and inﬁnite) summation over an integer j. The transformation is worthy if the latter sum eﬀectively contains less terms than the original m-sum (1.1a), i.e., converges more rapidly. B. Saddle point method and eﬀective channel representation Our next step is evaluation of integrals over min (3.4). As demonstrated in Sec. II, the phase of the term d+ Nmin the sum (1.1a) varies rapidly with the summation index m. Physically this follows from a multiphoton nature of the pro cess under consideration. We presume that the exponent in (3.4) is responsible for this, w hereas the pre-exponential factor Qmµvaries slowly. This allows us to use the saddle point method t o carry out explicitly the integration over the ATI channel label m. The position of the saddle point(s) is governed by equation 7d dmS/parenleftBig tmµ, t′ mµ0/parenrightBig =−2πj . (3.5) When taking derivative in Eq. (3.5) one has to remember that t here are two sources of m-dependence: ﬁrst, via t′ mµ0andtmµthat are the integration limits in the deﬁnition (3.2), and, second, via Kmthat enters the integrand in (3.2). However the situation is drastically simpliﬁed by the fact that ∂ ∂t′S(t, t′)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle t′=t′mµ0= 0, (3.6a) ∂ ∂tS(t, t′)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle t=tmµ= 0 (3.6b) sincet′ mµ0andtmµare the saddle points in integration respectively over t′andtvariables as discussed brieﬂy in Sec. I and in more detail in Appendices A a nd B, see formulae (A5) and (B11). Therefore Eq. (3.5) takes a compact form ( dKm/dm=ω/K m) /bracketleftbigg Km(t−t′+jT) +F ω/integraldisplayt t′sinωτ dτ/bracketrightbigg t′=t′mµ0;t=tmµ= 0, (3.7a) or, more explicitly, Km/parenleftBig tmµ−t′ mµ0+jT/parenrightBig =F ω2/parenleftBig cosωtmµ−cosωt′ mµ0/parenrightBig . (3.7b) It is to be considered together with formulae (A7) and (B13) d eﬁning positions of saddle points in integration over t′andtvariables respectively. The unknown variable to be deﬁned is the ATI label mc(N, j). As shown below, only complex-valued solutions are possib le. Note thatmenters (3.7b), (A7) and (B13) only via Km(1.3). Therefore solution of the saddle point equation (3.7b) amounts to ﬁnding complex-valued tra nslational momentum Kmc(N, j) of electron in the intermediate ATI channel that gives major contribution to the generation ofN-th harmonics. Within the saddle point approximation formula (3.4) is redu ced to d+ N= 2∞/summationdisplay j=−∞/summationdisplay mc/summationdisplay µQmcµ/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt2π iS′′mcexp/bracketleftBig −iS/parenleftBig tmcµ, t′ mcµ0/parenrightBig −2πijm c/bracketrightBig , (3.8) where S′′ mc≡d2 dm2S/parenleftBig tmµ, t′ mµ0/parenrightBig/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle m=mc=ω2 K2m/parenleftBig tmcµ−t′ mcµ0+jT/parenrightBig + +ω Kmc/parenleftBigg√ 2Nω−κ2dtmµ dm−iκdt′ mµ0 dm/parenrightBigg m=mc. (3.9) The necessary derivatives are straightforwardly derived u sing formulas (A7) and (B13), respectively, as 8dt′ mµ0 dm=−ω KmFcosωt′mcµ0,dtmµ dm=−ω KmFcosωtmcµ. (3.10) Even more appealing form of expression (3.8) is obtained if o ne reexpresses the con- stituent factors in terms of ATI and LAR amplitudes: d+ N= 2/summationdisplay j/summationdisplay mcAmcµ0(Kmc)1 Rmcµ µ0CNm c(Kmc) Ξ(mc, j), (3.11) Ξ(mc, j)≡/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt2π iS′′ mcexp(−2πijm c). (3.12) Here we omit summation over µimplying that it is absorbed into the sum over mc, since each saddle point mcis obtained for some choice of label µ. The form of expansion (propagation) factor 1 Rm µ µ 0=ω2 F/parenleftBig cosωtmµ−cosωt′ mµ0/parenrightBig (3.13a) is a natural speciﬁcation of the more general expression obt ained earlier [15,14] and cited in Eq. (B3). In particular, at the saddle point on can use Eq. (3. 7b) to rewrite propagation factor as 1 Rmcµ µ0=1 Kmc/parenleftBig tmcµ−t′mcµ0+jT/parenrightBig. (3.13b) Formula (3.11) provides the most concentrated expression o f the result of present work. Apart from the smooth factor Ξ( mc, j), it is fully analogous to our starting point expression (1.1), but with summation over large number of intermediate ATI channels mreplaced in Eq. (3.11) by summation over small number of eﬀective chan nelsmc. Note that the factorization of propagation and LAR amplitudes, as given b y formula (1.2), appears as an additional approximation in the framework of our previou s approach [14,15] where the t-integration was carried out numerically. In the EC formula tion the factorization is a necessary feature, due to the saddle-point method applied t o calculation of integral over time variable t, see Appendix B. The form (3.13a) of the expansion factor is m ore accurate than the approximation 1 Rm µ0=−ω2 Fcosωt′ mµ0(3.13c) discussed (within unessential sign) earlier [14,15] and im plied in formula (1.2) of the present paper. The transparent interpretation of the saddle point equatio n (3.7a) is based on the fact that z(t, t′;p) =p(t−t′+jT) +F ω/integraldisplayt t′sinωτ dτ (3.14) is the electron displacement along z-axis in course of its wiggling motion in the laser ﬁeld as time varies from t′tot. The axis is directed along the electric ﬁeld vector F; the electron 9translational momentum phas the same direction. In terms of z(t, t′;p) (3.14) the saddle point equation (3.7a) can be equivalently rewritten as z/parenleftBig tmµ+jT, t′ mµ0;Km/parenrightBig = 0. (3.15) This equation has a lucid physical meaning. In the semiclass ical picture of HG, as imple- mented by the present theory, the electron emerges from the u nder barrier at the instant of time t′ mµ0into the m-th channel of ATI continuum and undergoes backward transit ion into the bound state with emission of the Ω photon at time tmµ. Both these events occur relatively close to the atomic core. Eq. (3.15) is the condit ion that after propagation in the laser ﬁeld the electron returns exactly [20] to the emission point. It accounts to the fact that the propagation time could be augmented by additional jlaser ﬁeld periods T. The integer parameter jconjugate to min the “Fourier transformation” (3.4) can be named a recur- sion number . As discussed above, in fact equation (3.15) deﬁnes an appro priate electron momentum Kmc. The latter proves to be complex-valued as shown below. The return condition (3.15) is universal in the sense that it does not contain explicitly the harmonic order N(the latter parameter implicitly deﬁnes the return time tmµ). The condition of return is intrinsic in the physical picture of t he three-step process. Being constituent part of the atomic antenna idea of Ref. [2], it ap peared in some form in previous studies by other authors. The most close links could be estab lished with Ref. [8]. This paper employs a diﬀerent representation that does not appea l to the intermediate ATI channels. Nevertheless the saddle point method applied in t hese calculations also leads to the equation for the saddle points with the same physical mea ning. Moreover, the same number of saddle points plays substantial role (namely, one point at the cutoﬀ region and two points at the plateau domain, see below). Unfortunately the saddle point evolution with varying harmonic order Nwas not described in detail in the cited paper. Note also that the cited paper provides the HG rates only within an adjustable n ormalization factor. As already mentioned, the summation over jin the formulas (3.4), (3.8) or (3.11) reﬂects the fact that the time interval between the emission of elect ron and emission of the high- energy photon could be diﬀerent; namely, several ( j) periods of the laser ﬁeld could be added to it. All these events add up coherently as show Eqs. (3.8) or (3.11). The shortest time interval corresponds to j= 0. Physically one can anticipate that the related contribu tion prevails because of a spread of electron wave packet. Mathem atically the term with j= 0 is obtained by plain replacement of the summation over min Eq. (1.1) by integration. Further on we concentrate on calculation of this term and consider at ﬁrst (Sec. IIIC) the related saddle points mc(N)≡mc(N, j= 0). Let us discuss now a restriction on the summation index jin (3.8). In the saddle point method one deforms the integration contour so that it passes via the saddle points; only close vicinities of the saddle point eﬀectively govern the integr al magnitude. Generally, the shifted contour passes only via some subset of the saddle points avai lable; only the points from this subset contribute to the integral. We deal with multi-dimen sional problem (integration over variables m, t, t′) that casts analysis of the integration contour deformatio n as a complicated task. To circumvent this obstacle we adopt an approach based on simple physical arguments. As discussed above, the recursion number jcounts a number of periods of time that elapse between the electron escape and its return to the atom. The th ree-step mechanism presumes that the moment of escape must precede the moment of return. T his condition can only be 10satisﬁed for non-negative values of j. Basing on this physical argument we assume that the saddle points mccontribute to the integral only for non-negative j≥0. Saddle points mcwhich contribute to summation over mcin formula (3.8) should satisfy additional condition Im/bracketleftBig S/parenleftBig tmcµ, t′ mcµ0/parenrightBig + 2πjm c/bracketrightBig <0, (3.16) which ensures that the factor in the exponent in the right-ha nd side of Eq. (3.8) always reduces the absolute value of the amplitude. Again we do not a ttempt to validate (3.16) mathematically, but note instead that this condition is ver y similar to a conventional re- striction on the resonances in stationary processes. Remem ber that the energy E0of a conventional resonance has the real and imaginary parts. Th e later one describes the width of the resonance Im E0=−Γ/2<0, and must be negative. In the time-dependent formalism the resonance contribution to the amplitude is given by the f actor exp( −iE0t), where t >0 is the time elapsed since the resonance intermediate state h as been excited. The condition ImE0<0 selects one of two complex-conjugate poles of the S-matrix, or Green function, thus ensuring the decay of the resonance, i.e., that \|exp(−iE0t)\|<0. Similar physical meaning has Eq. (3.16). Eqs. (3.8) or (3.11) are the major result of this paper. They i mplement the objective formulated in Sec. IIIA to carry out the “Fourier transforma tion” of Eq. (3.4). The latter expression includes summation over the physical, discrete spectrum mof the intermediate ATI states. In contrast, Eq. (3.8) refers to some complex-va luedmcwhich label EC. Addi- tionally, Eq. (3.8) includes summation over recursion numb erj, that is a number of laser periods Tthat elapse between the ionization and HG generation. It is i mportant that the sum over jconverges well. The reason for this originates from the disc ussed above fact of the slow convergence of the spectral representation (3.4). It i s a general, well known fact that if the spectral pattern is broad, then the “Fourier transfor mation” should be well localized. Same argument can be presented from another point of view. Th e shortest (positive) time interval between the ionization and HG emission correspond s toj= 0. One can anticipate that the related contribution prevails because the spread o f the electron wave packet should signiﬁcantly diminish contributions of events with larger j. Presuming that this argument is correct, we will replace in the applications (Sec. IV) sum mation over jin Eq. (3.11) by the only term with j= 0. Good numerical results obtained illustrate the fact tha t the term j= 0 really dominates. For j= 0 we ﬁnd only few (one or two) operative EC mc. Thus the sum (3.11) over EC comprises very few terms that is conven ient for interpretation of the results. The physical background of the mathematical transformatio ns above can be brieﬂy sum- marized as follows. The electron motion in a laser ﬁeld in the vicinity of an atom satisﬁes the adiabatic condition because the number of laser quanta a bsorbed and emitted in the HG process is large. The HG amplitude contains a large phase tha t is identical to the classical action S(t, t′) (3.2). This phase varies rapidly with all the parameters th at govern the elec- tron propagation in the intermediate state. Therefore the m ajor contribution to the event comes from such situations in which the phase is stationary, i.e. from the saddle points. The phase depends on the initial moment of virtual ionizatio nt′, the ﬁnal moment of the harmonic emission tand the energy of the electron in the intermediate state. Eqs . (3.6a), (3.6b), (3.5) represent the saddle-point conditions over t hese three variables. Altogether 11they deﬁne the two moments of time and the electron energy in t he intermediate state. C. Analysis of saddle point equation By summing and subtracting Eqs.(A7) and (B13) we obtain sinωtmµ+ sinωt′ mµ0+ 2Kmω F= 2Z, (3.17a) sinωtmµ−sinωt′ mµ0= 2Z′, (3.17b) with Z ≡1 2/parenleftBig√ 2Nω−κ2+iκ/parenrightBigω F, Z′≡1 2/parenleftBig√ 2Nω−κ2−iκ/parenrightBigω F. (3.18) If 2Nω > κ2, then one has Z∗=Z′. It is convenient to switch from t′ mµ0andtmµto x=1 2ω/parenleftBig tmµ+t′ mµ0/parenrightBig , y =1 2ω/parenleftBig tmµ−t′ mµ0/parenrightBig (3.19) and present (3.17a) and (3.17b) in the compact form sinxcosy+Kmω F=Z, (3.20a) cosxsiny=Z′. (3.20b) In the same notation Eq. (3.7b) reads Kmω F=−sinxsiny y+jπ. (3.21) By excluding Kmwe obtain a set of two equations for two variables xandy: sinx/parenleftBigg cosy−siny y+jπ/parenrightBigg =Z, (3.22a) cosxsiny=Z′. (3.22b) The next step is to exclude xthat after some algebra gives a compact transcendental equa tion for a single variable ˜ y=y+jπ: /parenleftBigg cot ˜y−1 ˜y/parenrightBigg2/bracketleftBig sin2˜y−(Z′)2/bracketrightBig =Z2. (3.23) As soon as ˜ yis found, one obtains Kmfrom ω FKm=Z 1−˜ycot ˜y. (3.24) The variable y(3.19) has a very lucid meaning: 2 y/ωis the active electron excursion time in the continuum, i.e., the time interval between the ﬁrst st ep in the three-step process, ATI 12and the last step, LAR. Change in the recursion number jis equivalent to change of the excursion time/parenleftBig tmµ−t′ mµ0/parenrightBig by an integer multiple of laser period T. To simplify subsequent analysis we restrict it to the case j= 0, or 0 ≤˜y=y < π, that gives the major contribution to the amplitude, as discussed in Sec. IIIB. When generation of high harmonics is considered, 2 Nω≫κ2, the estimate √ 2Nω−κ2≫κ (3.25) is valid that implies that one can put Z′≈ Z ≈√ 2Nω−κ2ω/(2F). This allows us to rewrite equation (3.23) governing saddle point positions i n an approximate form f(y2) =ω2 4F2/parenleftBig 2Nω−κ2/parenrightBig , (3.26) with the universal function f(y2) of a dimensionless parameter ydeﬁned as f(y2)≡(ycoty−1)2sin2y (ycoty−1)2+y2. (3.27) A plot of this function (Fig. 2) shows that in the interval of i nterest, 0 ≤ξ=y2< π2it has a single maximum located at ξm= 4.173 (ym= 2.043). For suﬃciently small N, when the right hand side of Eq. (3.26) is less than C1≡f(ξm) = 0.3966, this equation has two solutions designated as A and B in Fig. 2 where this situation is explicitly displayed. One can verify that these solutions satisfy condition (3.16) an d therefore both of them contribute to the HG amplitude. Note that both solutions correspond to r eal but diﬀerent excursion times 2 y/ω. When Nincreases, the roots A and B come closer and eventually merge at some critical value of N=Nbdeﬁned from ω2 4F2/parenleftBig 2Nbω−κ2/parenrightBig =C1, (3.28) that is Nbω=1 2κ2+C12F2 ω2=1 2κ2+ 3.1731Up. (3.29) For larger N > N bthe solutions A and B spit again, but this time they result in c omplex- valued y. The way to see this, is to note that in the vicinity of the maxi mum the function f(y2) behaves as f(y2)−f(y2 m)∼ −(y−ym)2. Further straightforward analyses indicates that only one of these two complex-valued solutions satisﬁe s condition (3.16) and contributes to the amplitude, while another one gives no contribution. Thus the number and the character of relevant solutions of Eq . (3.26) diﬀers for N < N b andN > N b. The excursion time switches from real to complex-valued th at indicates that the HG process changes it nature from the classically allowe d to classically forbidden one. Accordingly, as detailed in Sec. IV, at the point N < N bthe HG spectrum undergoes a transition from the plateau to the cutoﬀ region. Thus Eq. (3. 29) rederives the well-known upper border of the plateau domain in the HG spectrum (1.5) wi th a slightly diﬀerent 13coeﬃcient in front of Up. The validity condition for this derivation (3.25) essenti ally means that the photon energy Nbωis much higher than the initial electron binding energy1 2κ2. Before concluding this subsection we remark that one more so lution of Eq. (3.26) is shown in Fig. 2, being labeled as C. It corresponds to negative y2and has simple N-dependence since the function f(y2) is monotonous on the semiaxis y2<0. The fact that the solution C results in imaginary excursion time 2 y/ωindicates that it gives small contribution to the HG amplitude. IV. ILLUSTRATIVE APPLICATIONS A. Scanning harmonic order for ﬁxed laser intensity There are two natural and complementary outlooks on the resu lts for HG process. One can ﬁx the laser intensity Iand scan the rates for harmonics of diﬀerent order, as done in this subsection, or one can ﬁx the harmonic order Nand vary the laser intensity (Sec. IVB). In both cases we consider HG by H−ion in the laser ﬁeld with the frequency ω= 0.0043. Fig. 3 depicts a typical pattern of evolution of mc(N) in the complex- mplane for ﬁxed laser ﬁeld intensity I= 1011W/cm2. Positions of three complex-valued roots of the exact saddle-point equation (3.7b) are shown by symbols of diﬀere nt shape. The roots move as the harmonic order Nvaries; we show their positions for odd (physical) values of N. For large Nonly one root has negative imaginary part (it is shown by diam onds in Fig. 3) that ensures harmonic rate decrease with increasing N. Fig. 4 shows results of the rates calculation in the saddle point approximation (3.8) where o nly this single root is taken into account in the summation over mc. The cutoﬀ region in the rates spectrum is nicely reproduced, as well as the overall pattern in the plateau dom ain. However the single-saddle- point approximation does not reproduce some structures in t heN-dependence of HG rates. In the plateau domain the saddle point mc(N) moves close to the real m-axis. For small N this saddle point approaches the point m=mthon the real axis in the complex- mplane that corresponds to the ATI threshold mth=κ2 2ω+Up ω. (4.1) Transition to the cutoﬀ region with Nincreasing corresponds to steep bending of the saddle point trajectory after which it moves almost perpend icular to the real axis. The reason of the trajectory bending is seen to be a “collision” w ith another saddle point shown by the circles in Fig. 3. In the “collision” region the two sad dle points (“diamonds” and “circles”) abruptly change direction of motion forming the characteristic cross-like pattern. The “collision” occurs at N=Ncol≈35. Approximately one can identify NcolwithNb. For N < N colthe two saddle points mcare to be taken into account in formula (3.8). As shown in Fig. 4, this improves the results for the rates in the plateau domain by producing appropriate structures in the N-dependence. Remarkably, such a two-saddle-point calcula tion gives correct positions of minima and maxima in the rate N-dependence, albeit the magnitudes of the rate variation is reproduced somewhat worse; for instan ce the depth of the minimum at N= 17 is quite strongly overestimated. Tentatively one can at tribute this to the fact that if the principal term in the approximation for d+ Nconsidered here proves to be anomalously 14small for some N, then the correction terms omitted in our calculations beco me relatively important. The good overall description of the structure un ambiguously identiﬁes its nature as a result of an interference between the contributions com ing from two eﬀective ATI channels. The plain saddle point approximation (3.8) presumes that th e saddle points are well separated from each other; otherwise the more complicated u niform approximations are to be constructed. In our problem this refers to the “collision ” region N≈Ncolwhere our simple approximation somewhat overestimate rates; howeve r we do not resort here to the more sophisticated mathematical constructions. Note that the third saddle point shown by triangles in Fig. 3 is substantial only in calculations for t he lowest harmonics. Therefore it is not taken into account in the present calculations. B. Scanning laser intensity for ﬁxed harmonic order It is equally instructive to see how the rate of some individu al harmonic depends on the laser intensity I. Fig. 5 shows trajectories of the saddle points as Ivaries; only two most important saddle points are considered. For small intensit ies only the saddle point shown by diamonds is operative in evaluation of HG rate. This corre sponds to the rapid-fall-oﬀ regime beyond the plateau domain. Here Im mcis large and negative. As Iincreases, the saddle point moves to the real maxis. After crossing the axis the trajectory abruptly bends atIabout 3 ×1010W/cm2. For higher intensities, in the plateau domain, the second s addle point, shown by circles, should also be taken into account in calculation of HG rates. In this region the single-saddle-point approximation correctly r eproduces an average behavior of the HG rate, whereas the two-saddle-point approximation shows also characteristic oscillations of the rate with I(Fig.6). The positions of minima and maxima are correctly re produced for medium intensities. On the higher Iside an additional maximum at I= 9×1010W/cm2 is beyond the two-saddle-point approximation being tentat ively due to the contribution of the third saddle point omitted in the present calculations. This contribution could be also the source of an additional minor structure in the medium int ensity region. It could explain also the fact that the two-saddle-point approximation give s deeper minima in the rates than the numerical summation in (1.1). The present calculations clearly show that the structures i n HG rates as function of I is related to the interference eﬀects, in agreement with con clusion reached by Lewenstein et al[8]. The alternative explanation [10,11] relates this stru cture to the threshold eﬀects, namely to the successive closure of ATI channels by increasi ng ponderomotive potential as Igrows. However, the threshold eﬀects should be manifested a lso in the single-saddle-point approximation; Fig. 6 demonstrates that this is not the case . In the plateau regime the saddle point mcshown by diamonds in Fig. 6 lies in the complex- mplane close to the threshold value mthcalculated for the same laser intensity using formula (4.1). As Iincreases, mctends to approach mth. This behavior is in agreement with the three-step model developed by Corkum [3] who presum ed that the ATI electron leaves an atom with zero velocity. Note however, that this pr esumption is valid only within single-saddle-point approximation (shown by diamonds in F ig. 5) and only in the plateau domain. The point m=mthis a branch point for any function which depends on m viaKm. In particular, generally the preexponential factor Qmµ(3.3) in expression (3.4) 15has such a branch point. In principle one can look for some reﬁ ned version of the saddle point approximation which accounts for closeness of a saddl e point and a branch point. Note however that such modiﬁcations inﬂuence only the preex ponential factor but not the exponent which is the principal object of interest. As discu ssed above, description of the transition between one-saddle point and two-saddle point r egimes is more diﬃcult for the semiclassical-type theory since it requires more sophisti cated approach. In the present case the situation is aggravated by the presence of the branch poi nt. It makes behavior of trajectories near the ’collision point’ quite diﬀerent fro m the conventional cross-like pattern (Fig. 5) and leads to appearance of a spike on the dashed curve in Fig. 6 at the borderline intensity I= 2.7×1010W/cm2. V. CONCLUSION The present study has an objective to get a better insight int o the three-step mechanism of processes in strong laser ﬁeld. We take HG as the simplest c ase of three-step process and employ representation of its amplitude in terms of amplitud es of physical, fully accomplished ATI and PLAR processes. The number of alternative paths in th e three-step picture is generally inﬁnite, each path being labeled by the number mof laser photons absorbed in the ﬁrst step, ATI. We explore the range of substantial intermed iate ATI channels and reveal crucial role of coherent interference. The eﬀective scheme of summation of the contributions coming from diﬀerent intermediate ATI channels is develope d based on the saddle point method. Physically this approach is justiﬁed by the multiph oton nature of the process. Due to it in the strong-ﬁeld regime both ATI and PLAR amplitud es have phases that vary rapidly with m. Within this framework we develop concept of eﬀective ATI ch annels that is important basically and useful for practical calculatio ns. In this approach interference of inﬁnite number of competing paths is replaced by the single- path picture for generation of high harmonic, or by interference of two paths for harmonics lying in the plateau domain. In particular, the structure in HG rates in the latter domain is understood as the simple two-paths interference pattern. The eﬀective ATI channels are related to the particular clas sical electron trajectories that ensure that electron emitted from the atom at the ﬁrst, ATI st age of HG process returns to the core to make possible subsequent laser assisted recombi nation. The possible trajectories possessing this property in principle comprise an inﬁnite s et diﬀering by the excursion time in continuum which is integer multiple of laser period T. However due to quantum wave packet spread only the trajectories with the shortest excur sion time provide substantial contribution to HG rate. The crucial step in this developmen t is compexiﬁcation of the problem: the initial and ﬁnal time is complex-valued that ma kes entire classical trajectory also complex-valued. The simplicity of description achiev ed along these lines is in sharp contrast with the approach based on the conventional real-t ime classical trajectories where the problems related to chaotic irregular classical motion emerge in full scale [23]. 16ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work has been supported by the Australian Research Coun cil. V. N. O. acknowl- edges the hospitality of the staﬀ of the School of Physics of U NSW where this work has been carried out. APPENDIX A: ATI AMPLITUDE IN ADIABATIC APPROXIMATION The original expression for the ATI amplitude within the Kel dysh [1] approximation reads Am(p) =1 TT/integraldisplay 0dt′/an}b∇acketle{tΦp(t′)\|VF(t)ˆdǫ\|Φa(t′)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (A1) where Φ pis the Volkov state of the electron with the translational mo mentum p, Φais the electron initial bound state. Details of all the deﬁnitions could be found in Ref. [15]; here we indicate only that VF(r, t) =r·Fcosωtdescribes an interaction of the active electron and the laser ﬁeld, with ω,FandTbeing introduced in Sec. IB. The absolute value pmof the electron momentum in the m-the ATI channel is subject to energy conservation constrai nt being given by formula (1.3) ( pm=Km). The adiabatic treatment of the ATI process was developed in R ef. [21] and subsequently applied in Refs. [22,14,15]. It presents the ATI amplitude Am(p) as A(sp) m(p) =/summationdisplay µA(sp) m µ(p), (A2) A(sp) m µ(p) =−(2π)2 TAaΓ(1 + ν/2) 2ν/2κνYlmaz(ˆp)exp/bracketleftBig iS(t′ mµ)/bracketrightBig /radicalBig −2πiS′′(t′mµ)ν+1, (A3) where S(t) is the classical action S(t) =1 2/integraldisplayt dτ/parenleftBigg p+F ωsinωτ/parenrightBigg2 −Eat . (A4) The position of the saddle points t′ mµin the complex t′plane is deﬁned by equation S′(t′ mµ) = 0 , (A5) or, more explicitly, /parenleftBigg p+F ωsinωt′ mµ/parenrightBigg2 +κ2= 0. (A6) Expression for HG amplitude (1.1) refers to the particular s addle point ( µ=µ0) deﬁned for the monochromatic laser ﬁeld by the expressions 17sinωt′ m µ0=ω F(−Km+iκ), (A7a) cosωt′ m µ0=/radicalBigg 1−ω2 F2(−Km+iκ)2. (A7b) The other notations are as follows:1 2κ2is initial electron binding energy, ν=Z/κ,Zis the charge of the atomic residual core ( ν=Z= 0 for a negative ion), l,mazare the active electron orbital momentum and its projection in the initial state. In the present context the unit vector ˆpcoincides with ˆF=F/F. The coeﬃcients Aaare speciﬁed in Ref. [21] being tabulated for many atoms and ions [24]. Mathematicall y formula (A2) is obtained by using the saddle point method to carry out integration ove r time variable t′in formula (A1). The saddle point positions are deﬁned by Eqs. (A5) or (A 6) that are to be considered together with the energy conservation constraint (1.3). Th e summation in (A2) runs over the saddle points t′ m µin the plane of the complex-valued time t′. The saddle points t′ mµlie symmetrically with respect to the real t′axis. For the monochromatic laser ﬁeld there are four saddle points in the interval 0 ≤Ret′ mµ≤T, two of them lying in the upper half plane (Imt′ mµ>0). Only these two saddle points are included into the summat ion in (A2). If ATI is considered as the ﬁrst step in HG process, then, as discuss ed in detail in Ref. [15], only one of these two saddle points is eﬀectively operative, name ly, that speciﬁed by formulae (A7). APPENDIX B: LAR AND PLAR AMPLITUDES IN ADIABATIC APPROXIMATION The PLAR amplitude deﬁned as BN mµ 0(p) =−1 2πTT/integraldisplay 0dt1 R0(t, t′mµ0)/an}b∇acketle{tΦa(t)\|exp(iΩt)ˆdǫ\|Φp(t)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (B1) diﬀers from the LAR (Laser Assisted Recombination) amplitu deCm(p) CN m(p) =1 2πTT/integraldisplay 0dt/an}b∇acketle{tΦp(t)\|exp(iΩt)ˆdǫ\|Φa(t)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht (B2) only by the “propagation” or “expansion” factor 1 //bracketleftBig R0(t, t′ mµ0)/bracketrightBig in the integrand. The distance passed by electron in the laser ﬁeld between initia l time t′and ﬁnal time tis approximated as [15] R0(t, t′) =F ω2(cosωt−cosωt′). (B3) In (B1), (B2) ˆdǫ=ǫ·ris the dipole interaction operator. Consider electron in the laser-dressed continuum state wit h the translational momentum p. It can recombine to the bound state Φ awith emission of the photon. Possible frequencies of the emitted photon ΩLAR jform an equidistant pattern: 18ΩLAR M=1 2p2+Up−Ea+Mω (B4a) with an integer M. Expression (B4a) can be reparametrized to the form ΩLAR j= (J+η)ω , (B4b) where Jis another integer and the fractional parameter η(0≤η <1) is governed by the value of the initial momentum p. In the zero-laser-ﬁeld limit ( F→0) only emission of the photon with the frequency ΩLAR F→0=1 2p2−Eais allowed. The presence of intensive laser ﬁeld makes possible the processes when laser photons are absorbe d from the ﬁeld or transmitted to it, and thus the entire spectrum (B4) is produced. Such a LA R process has not yet received much attention in literature; as far as we know, our recent study [25] is the only theoretical paper on the subject. In it the initial electron translational momentum pwas considered as an arbitrary input parameter as required in ap plications to LAR process in laser plasma. In other terms, the fractional parameter ηwas arbitrary. Here we are interested in LAR as a constituent part of HG proce ss. This application has some particular features. First, all the frequencies in the photon spectrum are integer multiples of ω, i.e.η= 0. This happens because the initial translational momentu mpof LAR process could not be arbitrary since only the discrete su bset of continuum states is populated by ATI from the bound state. Namely, the translati onal momentum is subject to the constraint (1.3) with mbeing the number of laser photons absorbed on the initial ATI stage of HG process. Second, when an individual harmonic is considered, its orde rNis ﬁxed, and the pa- rameter mis scanned when summation is carried out according to the exp ression (1.1a). Equivalently, the electron momentum p=Km, is scanned along the discrete set of allowed values Km, see Eq. (1.3). This is in variance with the laser plasma appl ications when it is natural to presume that pis ﬁxed and ΩLARis scanned. The third special feature is that the electron translational momentum p=Kmis parallel to the electric ﬁeld amplitude F. Finally, the object of interest in HG theory is the PLAR ampli tude (B1) rather than LAR amplitude (B2), although both amplitudes are quite simi lar. Below we brieﬂy expose modiﬁcation of some results in the LAR theory relevant to the present application. The expressions (B1) and (B2), respectively, for PLAR and LA R process amplitudes are valid in the Keldysh-type approximation. By using the Fo urier transformation they are rewritten as BN mµ 0(Km) =−1 2πTT/integraldisplay 0dt1 R0(t, t′mµ0)exp{i[Ωt−S(t)]}˜φ(ǫ) a/parenleftBigg −Km−F ωsinωt/parenrightBigg ,(B5) CNm(Km) =−1 2πTT/integraldisplay 0dtexp{i[Ωt−S(t)]}˜φ(ǫ) a/parenleftBigg −Km−F ωsinωt/parenrightBigg , (B6) where the classical action S(t) is introduced above by formula (A4). The function ˜φ(ǫ) a(q) is deﬁned as ˜φ(ǫ) a(q) =i(ǫ· ∇q)˜φa(q). (B7) 19where ˜φa(q) is the Fourier transform of the bound state wave function φa(r): ˜φa(q) =/integraldisplay d3rexp(−iqr)φa(r). (B8) The time integrals in (B5) and (B6) could be evaluated using t he saddle point approxi- mation: BN m µ 0=1 2πT/summationdisplay µω2 F/parenleftBig cosωt′ m µ0−cosωtm µ/parenrightBig˜φ(ǫ) a/parenleftBigg −Km−F ωsinωtmµ/parenrightBigg × ×/radicalBigg 2π iS′′(tmµ)exp{i[Nωt mµ−S(tmµ)]}. (B9) CN m=−1 2πT/summationdisplay µ˜φ(ǫ) a/parenleftBigg −Km−F ωsinωtmµ/parenrightBigg × ×/radicalBigg 2π iS′′(tmµ)exp{i[Nω t mµ−S(tmµ)]}, (B10) where summation is to be taken over the saddle points tmµoperative in the contour integra- tion. The position of saddle points in the complex t-plane is governed by the equation S′(tmµ)−Ω = 0 , (B11) or, more explicitly 1 2/parenleftBigg p+F ωsinωtmµ/parenrightBigg2 =Ea+ Ω. (B12) Its solution is sinωtmµ=ω F/parenleftBig −Km±√ 2Nω−κ2/parenrightBig . (B13) ForN= 0 the formula (B13) coincides with that governing the saddl e point position in case of ATI processes [see Eq. (A7)]. As in the latter case, Eq . (B11) has four solution per the ﬁeld cycle (i.e for 0 <Retmµ< T). Physically t′ m µ0is the time when the electron is emitted at the ﬁrst step of HG process and tm µis the time of electron return back to the initial bound state at the last stage. Note however that both t′ m µ0andtm µare generally complex-valued. Formula (B13) might give real-valued saddle points tmµthat correspond to the classically allowed LAR or PLAR. According to Eq. (B12) this means emissi on of the high-energy photon at the real moments of time when the instantaneous kin etic energy of the electron in the laser ﬁeld diﬀers from the bound state energy Eaby Ω. In this respect LAR or PLAR processes diﬀer basically from ATI process which is always d escribed by the complex-valued saddle points that corresponds to the classically forbidde n or tunneling transitions. The classically allowed transitions in LAR or PLAR are absent fo r small Nwhen N < κ2/(2ω). However we are interested only in generation of harmonics wi th suﬃciently high order: N >κ2 2ω. (B14) 20In this case the classically allowed population is operativ e provided mis not too large, namely Km<F ω+√ 2Nω−κ2, (B15a) i.e. m < m+ N≡N+ 3Up ω+F ω2√ 2Nω−κ2. (B15b) IfNis suﬃciently large, namely if F ω<√ 2Nω−κ2, (B16a) i.e. N >κ2 2ω+2Up ω, (B16b) then the domain of classically populated m-channels is bounded from below by the condition Km>−F ω+√ 2Nω−κ2, (B17a) i.e. m > m− N≡N+3Up ω−F ω2√ 2Nω−κ2. (B17b) In the interval m− N< m < m+ Nthe classical population is governed by two real saddle poin ts tmµper ﬁeld cycle. Note that for the real LAR or PLAR process one a lways implies that them-th ATI channel is open, i.e. mis suﬃciently large: m > m th (B18) where mthis deﬁned by Eq. (4.1). The same constraint is assumed also in the sum over m in formula (1.1a) implementing the three-step mechanism of HG [14,15]. For intermediate Nlying in the interval κ2 2ω< N <κ2 2ω+2Up ω(B19) another regime of classical population becomes possible. N amely, if the condition Km<F ω−√ 2Nω−κ2, (B20a) i.e. mth< m < m− N≡N+3Up ω−F ω2√ 2Nω−κ2 (B20b) is satisﬁed, there are four saddle points tmµper ﬁeld cycle. 21In Fig. 7 we illustrate these results taking LAR of electron o n hydrogen atom with formation of negative H−ion. The laser ﬁeld intensity is I= 1011W/cm2. Open ATI channels lie at m≥16. The intermediate Nregime (B19) takes place for 7 ≤N≤24. In Fig. 7a we show mdistributions of LAR modulus squared amplitudes \|CNm\|2for two adjacent Nfrom the intermediate- Ndomain, N= 13 and N= 15. For N= 13 the classically forbidden domain is m≥62; the classical population in the two-saddle-point regim e is operative for 19 ≤m≤61, the four-saddle-point regime is operative for 16 ≤m≤18. For N= 15 the classical population is forbidden for m≥66; it is allowed in the two-saddle-point regime for 18 ≤m≤66; the four-saddle-point regime is operative for 16 ≤m≤17. The region of transition from classically allowed to classical ly forbidden LAR requires some more elaborate treatment to reproduce related transition patte rn similar to Airy function. The special analysis is required also to describe a transition f rom two-saddle-point to four-saddle point regime. However here we do not pursue the objective of d etailed uniform description of LAR or PLAR amplitudes. Note that for N= 0 the saddle points coincide with the singularity of the int egrand ˜φ(ǫ) a(q). This coincidence occurs also in the adiabatic treatment o f ATI. The diﬀerence is that in the particular case of above threshold detachment of negative ion the singularity in the integrand is canceled and the standard form of the sadd le point approximation is applicable. Otherwise (i.e. in case of non-zero atomic core charge) the saddle point method is to be applied in the somewhat modiﬁed form. In case of LAR th e singularity is always present, and hence the modiﬁed form of the saddle point metho d should be applied for N= 0. Respectively, the small Ncase requires some special treatment (some sort of uniform approximation; note that all these modiﬁcations aﬀ ect only the pre-exponential factor, but the principal exponent remains the same). Below we are interested in the large Ncase that allows us to put aside these complications. Howeve r, it is to be remembered that coincidence of the saddle point and the singularity of the mo mentum space wave function means that only large- rasymptote of the initial state wave function ϕa(r) in the coordinate space is of importance. This is the case for ATI, but not for LA R or PLAR, as follows from the preceding discussion. In other words, the LAR amplitude (or its PLAR counterpart) generally are more sensitive for the short-range behavior o f the wave function. 22REFERENCES ∗Permanent address: Institute of Physics, The University of St Petersburg, 198904 St Petersburg, Russia. [1] L. V. Keldysh, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1945 (1964) [Sov. Phys.-JETP 20, 1307 (1965)]. [2] M. Yu. Kuchiev, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 45, 319 (1987) [JETP Letters 45, 404 (1987)]. [3] P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993). [4] J. L. Krause, K. J. Schafer, and K. C. Kulander, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 3535 (1992). [5] K. C. Kulander, K. J. Schafer, and J. L. Krause, in Super-Intense Laser-Atom Physics , Vol.316 of NATO Advanced Study Institute, Series B: Physics , edited by B. Piraux et al(Plenum, New York, 1993), p. 95. [6] A. L’Huillier, M. Lewenstein, P. Salli` ers, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, J. Larsson, and C. G. Wahlstr¨ om, Phys. Rev. A 48, R3433 (1993). [7] M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. A49, 2117 (1994). [8] M. Lewenstein, P. Salli` ers, and A. L’Huillier, Phys. Re v. A52, 4747 (1995). [9] W. Becker, S. Long, and J. K. McIver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 4112 (1990). [10] W. Becker, S. Long, and J. K. McIver, Phys. Rev. A 46, R5334 (1992). [11] W. Becker, S. Long, and J. K. McIver, Phys. Rev. A 50, 1540 (1994). [12] M. Yu. Kuchiev, J. Phys. B 28, 5093 (1995). [13] M. Yu. Kuchiev, Phys. Lett. A 212, 77 (1996). [14] M. Yu. Kuchiev and V. N. Ostrovsky, J. Phys. B 32, L189 (1999). [15] M. Yu. Kuchiev and V. N. Ostrovsky, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3111 (1999). [16] A. Becker and H. F. M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 29, L197 (1996). [17] H. F. M. Faisal and A. Becker, Laser Physics 7, 684 (1997); A. Becker and H. F. M. Faisal, Laser Physics 8, 69 (1998). [18] A. Becker and H. F. M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. A 59, R1742 (1999). [19] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965); P. D. B. Collins, An Introduction to Regge Theory & High Energy Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977). [20] In the detailed picture [21] an electron emerges from th e under barrier at the source point separated from the core. There are two such points lyin g up and down the electric ﬁeld vector in the laser wave. The related contributions int erfere giving raise to the oscillatory patterns in the ATI angular distributions. The se physically essential features of HG mechanism are not manifested in the saddle point equati on (3.15) governing the momentum Kmc: this equation does not distinguish between position in spa ce of the source points and the atomic core. [21] G. F. Gribakin and M. Yu. Kuchiev, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3760 (1997); J. Phys. B 30, L657 (1997). [22] M. Yu. Kuchiev and V. N. Ostrovsky, J. Phys. B 31, 2525 (1998); Phys. Rev. A 59, 2844 (1999). [23] G. van de Sand and J. M. Rost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 524 (1999). [24] A. A. Radzig and B. M. Smirnov, Reference Data on Atoms, Molecules and Ions (Berlin: Springer, 1985). 23[25] M. Yu. Kuchiev and V. N. Ostrovsky, Phys. Rev. A 61, 033414 (2000). Note that this paper employed deﬁnition of LAR amplitude as 2 πtimes expression (B2). 24FIGURES FIG. 1. Contributions to the HG amplitude d+ Nfrom diﬀerent ATI m-channels according to the expression (1.1). The H−ion in the laser ﬁeld with the frequency ω= 0.0043 and intensity I= 1011W/cm2produces harmonic of the order Nindicated in the plots. The square moduli \|Mm\|2and phases arg( Mm) of three diﬀerent amplitudes Mmare pictured. The closed circles show the squared moduli and phases of the terms d+ Nm≡Am µ0BN mµ 0in the sum (1.1) over ATI channel label m. We present also the squared moduli and phases of the physica lly meaningful factors that constitute d+ Nm: ATI amplitude Am µ0(open squares) and PLAR amplitude BN mµ 0 (open triangles). For graphical representation the conven ient scaling factors are introduced in the plots of squared moduli, namely as \|Mm\|2we show everywhere 108/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2d+ Nm/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2, and also: for N= 15 – 106\|Am µ0\|2and 104\|BN mµ 0\|2; forN= 25 – 5 ·104\|Am µ0\|2and 104\|BN mµ 0\|2; forN= 39 – 104\|Am µ0\|2and 104\|BN mµ 0\|2; forN= 51 – 3 ·103\|Am µ0\|2and 104\|BN mµ 0\|2. FIG. 2. The universal function f(ξ) (3.27). FIG. 3. Trajectories of the saddle points mc(N) in the complex- mplane for ﬁxed laser intensity I= 1011W/cm2and varying harmonic order N. The results are for H−ion in the laser ﬁeld with the frequency ω= 0.0043. Positions of three saddle points for odd integer Nare denoted respectively by diamonds, circles and triangles. The plot ( a) gives general overview, the plot (b) shows the region where two saddle points “collide”, whereas the plot (c) details behavior of the saddle point trajectory in the vicinity of m=mth. FIG. 4. Harmonic generation rates (1.4) (in sec−1) for H−ion in the laser ﬁeld with the frequency ω= 0.0043 and various values of intensity Ias indicated in the plots. Closed circles - results obtained by Becker et al[11], open circles - our calculations [15] in the dipole-len gth gauge performing numerical summation (1.1) over contributions o f diﬀerent ATI channels, open diamonds – present results within the saddle point approximation (3. 8) for the summation over ATI channels contributions with a single saddle point mc(N) taken into account (namely, the saddle point shown by diamonds in Fig. 3); open squares – same but taking into acc ount two saddle points mc(N) (namely, these shown by diamonds and circles in Fig. 3). FIG. 5. Trajectories of the saddle points mc(N) in the complex- mplane for ﬁxed harmonic order N= 15 and varying laser intensity I=ζ×1010W/cm2(HG by H−ion in the laser ﬁeld with the frequency ω= 0.0043 is considered as in Fig. 3). The plot (a) gives general ov erview, the plot (b) shows vicinity of the real- maxis. Positions of two saddle points for odd integer N are denoted respectively by diamonds and circles with the nu mbers indicating value of the factor ζ, i.e. intensity in the units 1010W/cm2. The crosses in the plot (b) show positions of the ATI threshold deﬁned by formula (4.1) for the same values of ζ. 25FIG. 6. The rate parameter MN≡2log10/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingled+ N/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsinglefor the harmonic N= 15 as a function of the laser ﬁeld intensity I(HG by H−ion in the laser ﬁeld with the frequency ω= 0.0043). Solid curve - our calculations [15] in the dipole-length gauge per forming numerical summation (1.1) over contributions of diﬀerent ATI channels, dashed curve – pres ent results within the saddle point approximation (3.8) for the summation over ATI channels con tributions with a single saddle point mc(N) taken into account (namely, the saddle point shown by diamo nds in Fig. 5); dotted curve – same but taking into account two saddle points mc(N) (namely, these shown by diamonds and circles in Fig. 3). The bars with numbers mindicate the threshold intensities Imsuch that for I > I mthem-th ATI channel is closed due to ponderomotive potential. FIG. 7. Squared modulus of the amplitude CNmof the laser assisted recombination of electron into H−bound state in the laser ﬁeld with the frequency ω= 0.0043 and intensity I= 1011W/cm2. The harmonic order is ﬁxed [ N= 13 (circles) and N= 15 (triangles) in (a) and N= 39 (circles) in (b)]. Closed symbols – calculations using the formula (B6 ) with numerical integration over t; open symbols – adiabatic approximation (B10) with various n umber of saddle points taken into account for diﬀerent mas described in the text. 26
arXiv:physics/0007017v1 [physics.bio-ph] 9 Jul 2000Equations for Stochastic Macromolecular Mechanics of Single Proteins: Equilibrium Fluctuations, Transient Kinetics and Nonequilibrium Steady-State Hong Qian Department of Applied Mathematics University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.A. February 1, 2013 ABSTRACT A mathematical framework for the internal conformational d ynamics and external mechanical movement of single biological macromo lecules in aque- ous solution at constant temperature is developed. Both the internal dy- namics and external movement are stochastic; the former is r epresented by a master equation for a set of discrete states, and the latter is described by a continuous Smoluchowski (Fokker-Planck) equation. Comb ining these two equations into one, a comprehensive theory for the dynam ic of macro- molecules arises. This approach is shown to have wide applic ations. It is applied to protein-ligand dissociation under external f orce, unfolding of polyglobular proteins under extension, movement along lin ear tracks of motor proteins against load, and catalysis by ﬂuctuating en zymes. The dynamic equation is capable of characterizing thermodynam ic equilib- rium with ﬂuctuations, transient relaxation kinetics, and nonequilibrium steady-state. A reversibility condition which guarantees the equilibrium solution and its asymptotic stability is introduced, and pu mping under irreversible settings is discussed. Keywords: free energy, nano-biochemistry, Smoluchowski equation, s tochas- tic process, thermal ﬂuctuation 1Introduction I have not formally worked with Joel Keizer. However, he has b een like a mentor to me in the past 10 years mainly because our common interests in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics and biophysics, and because of Terre ll Hill. One can easily ﬁnd the inﬂuence of his work on what I present here. For quite a whi le, I had wanted to hear his comments on this work. Though the wish will forever u nfulﬁlled, I like to dedicate this paper to Joel. Progress in optics, electronics, and computer science has n ow made it possible to study biological macromolecules in aqueous solution at con stant temperature by ob- serving experimentally and measuring quantitatively the b ehavior of single biological macromolecules. These studies have been providing and will continue to yield impor- tant information on the behavior and properties of individu al biomolecules and to re- veal molecular interactions in and the mechanisms of biolog ical processes. The impact which single-molecule studies will have on molecular biolo gy may be gauged by com- parison with the pioneering studies on single channel prote ins in membranes, which have revolutionized physiology (Sakmann and Neher, 1995). The highly quantitative data obtained in these novel measurements, with piconewton and nanometer precision on the forces and movements of single biological macromolec ules, complement those from traditional kinetic studies and structural determina tions at the atomic level. The novel experimental approach requires new theoretical f ramework for quanti- tatively understanding, interpreting, and integrating la boratory data (Xie and Traut- men, 1998, Xie and Lu, 1999, Qian and Elson, 1999, Qian, 2000b ,c). The objective is to develop a unifying molecular theory which is capable of integrating the three classes of quantitative measurements on macromolecules: m acroscopic (kinetic spec- troscopies), mesoscopic (single molecules), and microsco pic (atomic structures). In this paper, we show how the spectroscopically deﬁned kineti cs, expressed in terms of discrete conformational states, is integrated with the mec hanics of a macromolecule. The philosophy behind this approach, Stochastic Macromolecular Mechanics , is that we realize the impracticality of representing the entire co nformational space of a macromolecule with a high-dimensional energy function. He nce we still rely on a discrete-state Markov model with experimentally deﬁned “s tates” and kinetic pa- rameters. However, we introduce a continuous energy landsc ape when there are experimental data on which to base from studies on single mol ecules. Therefore the stochastic macromolecular mechanics is a mix of the disc rete-state Markov ki- netics with Brownian dynamics based on available and releva nt experimental data. It is a mesoscopic theory with a single set of equations. The t heoretical approach helps researchers to identify the relevant (random) variab les and key parameters in a macromolecular system or process, and the equations follow . The discrete-state master equation approach has been gener ally recognized as the natural mathematical description for biochemical kine tics of individual molecules (cf. McQuarrie, 1967, Keizer, 1987). With more detailed inf ormation on molec- 2ular structures and energetics, the Smoluchowski’s contin uous description of over- damped Brownian dynamics has found numerous applications i n condensed matter physics, solution chemistry and also biochemistry of macro molecules (Agmon and Hopﬁeld, 1983a,b and references therein, also see a review b y H¨ anggi et al., (1990) on closely related work with Kramers’ approach which obviates the overdamping assump- tion). In dealing with a single protein molecule, the discre te approach is appropriate for spectroscopic studies while the continuous approach is necessary for mechanical measurements. By combining these two descriptions, the sto chastic macromolec- ular mechanics treats the internal conformational dynamic s of proteins as well as its external mechanics. In particular, both internal and ex ternal forces are explic- itly considered. On the mathematical level, such a combinat ion leads to coupled stochastic processes (Qian and Zhang, 1984), giving rise to three diﬀerent classes of problems: reversible stationary processes (in a physicist ’s term, thermal equilibrium with ﬂuctuations), nonstationary processes (kinetic tran sient), and irreversible sta- tionary processes (pumped nonequilibrium steady-state). The last class of processes is mathematically novel (Qian et al., 1991, Qian, 2000d) and necessary for modeling motor protein (e.g. kinesin and myosin) movement and energe tics (Hill, 1977, 1989, Peskin et al., 1994, Astumian, 1997, Qian, 1997, 2000a). The diﬀerential equations in stochastic macromolecular me chanics are Fokker- Planck-Master type (linear diﬀusion-convection equation s with variable coeﬃcients, c.f. Fox, 1978, Keizer, 1987). Its basis is conservation of p robability. This type of equations is diﬀerent from the well-studied nonlinear di ﬀusion-reaction equations (Murray, 1993, Qian and Murray, 2000) with distinctly diﬀer ent mathematical struc- tures (Qian, 1998a). Macromolecular Mechanics of Protein-Ligand Dissociation In this section, we study the dissociation of a single protei n-ligand complex under an external force introduced by an experimenter (Florin et a l., 1994, Moy et al., 1994, Chilkoti et al., 1995). As in any mechanics, the ﬁrst qu estion to ask is in what “object(s)” one is interested. In this case it is the positio n of the ligand with respect to the center of the mass of the protein. The next question is w hat is the forces acting on the ligand. This leads to a Newtonian equation in wh ich one neglects the acceleration term βdx dt=Fint(x) +Fext(x, t) +f(t). (1) The four terms are ( i) frictional force with frictional coeﬃcient β, (ii) intermolecu- lar force between the ligand and the protein, with potential energy function Uint(x): Fint(x)=−dUint(x)/dx, (iii) the external force, and ( iv) the stationary, pure random force due to collisions between the ligand and the solvent mo lecules: ∝an}bracketle{tf(t)∝an}bracketri}ht= 0. Be- cause of the presence of the random force f(t), the movement x(t) is stochastic, e.g., 3it is a Brownian motion. Mathematically equivalent, the Smo luchowski’s descrip- tion of overdamped Brownian dynamics is based on a partial di ﬀerential equation of parabolic type (van Kampen, 1997): β∂P(x, t) ∂t=kBT∂2P(x, t) ∂x2−∂ ∂x[(Fint(x) +Fext(x, t))P(x, t)] (2) where P(x, t) is now the probability density of the ligand being at xat time t.kB is the Boltzmann constant, and Tis temperature which characterizes the magnitude of the random force f(t):∝an}bracketle{tf(t)f(t′)∝an}bracketri}ht= 2kBTδ(t−t′). The above Eq. (1) and (2) have laid the basis for all models, bu t the choices for Uint(x) and Fextset the diﬀerence between diﬀerent models. In the work of Sha piro and Qian (1997,1998, Qian and Shapiro, 1999), Uint=V0[(x0/x)12−2(x0/x)6] with a smooth repulsive force, and Fext=k(x−d(t)) where kis the stiﬀness of the force probe exerting the external force, and d(t) is the position of the piezoelectric motor which drives the force probe. In the work of Evans and Ri tchie (1997,1999), Uint=−V0(x0/x)n(x > x 0) with an abrupt repulsion at x0, and Fext=−F(t) is independent of x. These diﬀerences give qualitatively similar but qualitat ive diﬀerent results. Hence they can be quantitatively tested against ex perimental date. Macromolecular Mechanics of Polyglobular Protein Unfoldi ng In the previous analysis of protein-ligand dissociation, w e have completely ne- glected the conformational change within the protein itsel f. The protein was treated as a rigid body exerting a force on the ligand. A more realisti c model will have to consider the possibility of internal protein conformation al change due to the external force, acting via the ligand. In this section, we study the un folding of a polyglobu- lar protein under extensional force. This problem naturall y brings out the internal dynamics of the macromolecules. To be concrete, let’s consider the recent experimental work on giant muscle protein titin (Kellermayer et al., 1997, Rief et al., 1997, Tskhovre bova et al., 1997). Titin is a protein with many globular domains (subunits) in serial. Th e subunits unfold under an external force pulling the entire molecule. The folded st ate of each subunit is rigid, and the unfolded state of each subunit can be regarded as a coi led polymer spring. Hence the conformational state of the entire protein, to a ﬁr st order approximation, can be characterized by n: the number of unfolded subunits within the molecule. Let’s assume the total number of subunits are N, and let xbe the total extension of the titin molecule (along the axis of external force), then a realistic characterization of a titin molecule is by two dynamic variables ( x, n), (x≥0,0≤n≤N). The equation of motion for xis again βdx dt=−dUint(x, n) dx+Fext+f(t) (3) 4in which nis itself a random (Markov) process. Hence the above equatio n is coupled to a master equation ∂P(n, t) ∂t= (N−n+ 1)λu(x, n−1)P(n−1, t) + (n+ 1)λf(x, n+ 1)P(x, n+ 1, t) −[nλf(x, n) + (N−n)λu(x, n)]P(n, t) (4) where P(n, t) is the probability for nat time t.λfandλuare folding and unfolding rate constants of individual subunits. They are function of the force acting on the subunit, which in turn is determined by the total extension o f the molecule ( x) and the number of unfolded domains in the chain ( n). A comprehensive description of both the internal dynamics a nd external movement can be obtained by combining Eq. (3) and (4). We therefore hav e ∂P(x, n, t) ∂t=/parenleftBiggkBT β/parenrightBigg∂2P(x, n, t) ∂x2+1 β∂ ∂x/bracketleftBigg/parenleftBiggdUint(x, n) dx+Fext/parenrightBigg P(x, n, t)/bracketrightBigg + (N−n+ 1)λu(x, n−1)P(x, n−1, t) + (n+ 1)λf(x, n+ 1)P(x, n+ 1, t) −[nλf(x, n) + (N−n)λu(x, n)]P(x, n, t) (5) where P(x, n, t) is the joint probability distribution of the titin molecule having internally nunfolded domains and external extension x. As in the previous section, particular models will have to pr ovide speciﬁc λf(x, n), λu(x, n), and Uint(x, n). These functions are not totally independent, however. Th er- modynamic reversibility dictates that λu(x, n) λf(x, n+ 1)=n+ 1 N−nexp/bracketleftBigg −Uint(x, n+ 1)−Uint(x, n) kBT/bracketrightBigg . (6) This condition guarantees that the stationary solution to E q. (5) is a thermodynamic equilibrium. Furthermore, this reversibility condition (also known as potential condition) also guarantees the asymptotic stability of the equilibrium solution. As we shall see below, without such a constraint, the stationary s olution in general represents a nonequilibrium steady-state. With the reversibility condition and in the absence of exter nal force Fext, it is easy to verify that the stationary solution to Eq. (5) is P∗(x, n) =Z−1e−U(x,n)/kBT(7) where Z=N/summationdisplay n=0/integraldisplay∞ 0e−U(x,n)/kBT. The time-dependent solutions to (5) are dynamic models for t ransient kinetics of macromolecules. 5We now show that the equilibrium solution P∗(x, n) is asymptotically stable. We introduce the free energy functional: A[P(x, n, t)] =N/summationdisplay n=0/integraldisplay∞ 0(U(x, n)P(x, n, t) +kBTP(x, n, t) lnP(x, n, t))dx =−kBTlnZ+kBTN/summationdisplay n=0/integraldisplay∞ 0P(x, n, t) ln/parenleftBiggP(x, n, t) P∗(x, n)/parenrightBigg dx in which the second term (also known as relative entropy, see Mackey, 1989) is always nonnegative and equal to zero if and only if P(x, n, t) =P∗(x, n). Based on Eq. (5) the time derivative of Ais ˙A[P(x, n, t)] =−N/summationdisplay n=0/integraldisplay∞ 0/bracketleftBigg β−1J2(x, t)P−1+kBT/parenleftBig J+ n−J− n/parenrightBig ln/parenleftBiggJ+ n J− n/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg dx(8) where J(x, t) =−kBT∂P(x, n, t) ∂x−dU(x, n) dxP(x, n, t) and J+ n(t) = (n+ 1)λf(x, n+ 1)P(x, n+ 1, t), J− n(t) = (N−n)λu(x, n)P(x, n, t). The integrand in Eq. (8) is always positive. Hence Ais a Lyapunov functional for the time-dependent solution of Eq. (5), which guarantees P∗to be asymptotically stable. The physical interpretation of the above result is straight forward: the free energy of a closed, isothermal molecular system monotonically dec reases to its minimum −kBTlnZ, when the system reaches its equilibrium. The dynamics in Eq . (5), however, is not governed by the gradient of the free energy. Macromolecular Mechanics of Motor Protein Movement With the presence of the reversibility condition, the previ ous model represents a “passive” complex molecule. Without the external force, su ch molecules relax to a thermodynamic equilibrium. They are biochemically intere sting, but they are not “alive”. One could argue that one of the fundamental propert ies of a living organism is the ability to convert energy among diﬀerent forms (solar to electrical, electrical to chemical, chemical to mechanical, etc.). We now show how sto chastic macromolecular mechanics can be used to develop models for chemomechanical energy transduction in single motor proteins (Howard, 1996). In the absence of an external force, a motor protein is undergoing nonequilibrium steady-state w ith ATP hydrolysis and generating heat – the most rudimentary form of energy metabo lism. 6The key for developing a theory for motor protein is to consid er that while bio- chemical studies of a protein in test tubes probe a set of disc rete conformational states of the molecule, the mechanical studies of a protein m easure positions and forces. Internally, a motor protein has many diﬀerent inter nal states within a hy- drolysis cycle, and a reaction scheme usually can be suggest ed from various kinetic studies. While the protein is going through its conformatio nal cycles, its center of mass moves along its designated linear track (e.g., kinesin on a microtubule, myosin on an actin ﬁlament, and polymerase on DNA) which usually has a periodic structure. The movement is stochastic; the interaction between the mot or and the track (the force ﬁeld) are usually diﬀerent for diﬀerent internal stat es of the molecule. These basic facts lead to the following equation ∂P(x, n, t) ∂t=/parenleftBiggkBT β/parenrightBigg∂2P(x, n, t) ∂x2+1 β∂ ∂x/bracketleftBigg/parenleftBiggdUint(x, n) dx+Fext/parenrightBigg P(x, n, t)/bracketrightBigg +N/summationdisplay k=1[λkn(x)P(x, k, t)−λnk(x)P(x, n, t)], (9) where P(x, n, t) denote the joint probability of a motor protein with intern al state n and external position x.Uint(x, n) is the interaction energy between the protein in statenand the track. λℓm(x) is the transition rate constant from internal state ℓto statemwhen the protein is located at x. Some of the λ’s are pseudo-ﬁrst order rate constants which contain the concentrations [ATP], [ADP], a nd [Pi]. When the ratio [ADP][Pi]/[ATP] is at its equilibrium value ( i.e., equilibrium con- stant), the U(x, n) and λℓm(x) are again constrained by the reversibility: λℓm(x) λmℓ(x)= exp/parenleftBigg −Uint(x, m)−Uint(x, ℓ) kBT/parenrightBigg . (10) It is clear, however, that when the ATP, ADP, and Pi are sustai ned at an arbitrary values, the stationary solution of the Eq. (9) will be in gene ral a nonequilibrium steady-state. Sustaining the concentration is a form of “pu mping” which keeps the system at nonequilibrium steady-state (Qian and Qian, 2000 ) with positive entropy production and heat generation (Qian, 2000d). Such a molecu lar device is also known as isothermal ratchet (for a review, see J¨ ulicher et al., 19 97, Qian, 1998a). If the concentrations are not actively sustained, then they will c hange slowly (since there is only a single molecule at work hydrolyzing ATP) and eventu ally reach a thermal equilibrium at which (10) will be satisﬁed. As in the previous sections, a practical model requires spec iﬁc choices for the parameters Uandλ. In the past several years, a large amount of work have appear ed on modeling translational motor proteins such as myosin and kinesin and rotational motor proteins such as ATP synthase (Elston et al., 1998, Wan g and Oster, 1998). Macromolecular Mechanics of Fluctuating Enzyme 7Equilibrium conformational ﬂuctuation of proteins play an important role in en- zyme kinetics. The theory of ﬂuctuating enzyme (Blomberg, 1 989) can be developed naturally in terms of the equations of stochastic macromole cular mechanics. Let’s consider a single enzyme, with its internal conformation ch aracterized by x, and N number of substrate molecules. The enzyme catalyzes a rever sible isomerization reac- tion between two forms of the substrate (reactant and produc t), with rate constants λ+(x) and λ−(x). The equation for the catalytic reaction coupled with the enz yme conformational ﬂuctuation, according to stochastic macromolecular mecha nics, is ∂P(n, x, t) ∂t=−[nλ++ (N−n)λ−]P(n, x, t) + (n+ 1)λ+P(n+ 1, x, t) + (N−n+ 1)λ−P(n−1, x, t) +D∂2P(n, x, t) ∂x2+k∂ ∂x(xP(n, x, t)), (11) (0≤n≤N) where P(n, x, t) is the probability of at time thaving nnumber of reactant molecules and the enzyme internal conformation being at x.Dandkcharacterize the protein conformational ﬂuctuation. xisperpendicular to the isomerization reaction coor- dinate as ﬁrst proposed by Agmon and Hopﬁeld (1983a), in cont rast to the other models which address random energy landscape along the reaction coordinate (e.g., Zwanzig, 1988). Eq. (11), which is essentially the same equa tion for the treatment of polyglobular protein unfolding (Eq. 5), uniﬁes and gener alizes several important work on ﬂuctuating enzymes. Along this approach, most work in the past have addressed the non-stationary, time-dependent solution to 11. These studies are motivated by macroscopic experi- ments which are initiated ( t= 0) with all the substrate in only the reactant form. If λ−(x) = 0 and N= 1, Eq. (11) is reduced to that of Agmon and Hopﬁeld (1983a). Ifλ−(x) = 0 but Nis large, then one can introduce a continuous variable ξ=n/N, known as the survival probability , and Eq. (11) can be approximated as (see Appendix I for more discussion) ∂P(ξ, x, t) ∂t=λ+(x)∂ ∂ξ(ξP(ξ, x, t)) +D∂2P(ξ, x, t) ∂x2+k∂ ∂x(xP(ξ, x, t)).(12) Att= 0, Prob {ξ= 1}= 1. The moments of ξ,∝an}bracketle{tξm∝an}bracketri}ht(x, t) =/integraltext1 0ξmP(ξ, x, t)dξ, can be easily obtained from Eq. (12): ∂∝an}bracketle{tξm∝an}bracketri}ht ∂t=−mλ+(x)∝an}bracketle{tξm∝an}bracketri}ht+D∂2∝an}bracketle{tξm∝an}bracketri}ht ∂x2+k∂ ∂x(x∝an}bracketle{tξm∝an}bracketri}ht). (13) Note Eq. (11) with N= 1 and Eq. (13) for ∝an}bracketle{tξ∝an}bracketri}htare idential. For λ+(x) =αx2+βx+γ, Eq. (13) can be exactly solved by various methods if one reali zes that its solution has a Gaussian form (Zwanzig, 1992, Wang and Wolynes, 1993,1994 , also see Appendix 8II). From Eq. (13) one immediately sees that high-order mome nts∝an}bracketle{tξm∝an}bracketri}htis related to ∝an}bracketle{tξ∝an}bracketri}htbyλ+(x)→mλ+(x) (Wang and Wolynes, 1995). Diﬀerent choices for λ+(x) lead to quantitatively diﬀerent models for ﬂuctuating enzymes in the literature. λ+(x)∝e−αxrepresents a ﬂuctuating activation energy barrier (Agmon and Hopﬁeld, 1983a); λ+(x) =α(x+x) (>0) representing a ﬂuctu- ating cofactor concentration (DiCera, 1991); λ+(x) =αx2representing a ﬂuctuating geometric bottleneck (Zwanzig, 1992). We now consider the reversible reaction (with λ−(x)∝ne}ationslash= 0) which previously has not been discussed. This class of models is appropriate for r ecent measurements on single-molecule enzymology (Xie and Lu, 1999). Again we ass umeNbeing large. Hence we have ∂P(ξ, x, t) ∂t=∂ ∂ξ/parenleftBigg Dξ(ξ, x)∂P(ξ, x, t) ∂ξ/parenrightBigg +∂ ∂ξ(Vξ(ξ, x)P(ξ, x, t)) +D∂2P(ξ, x, t) ∂x2+∂ ∂x(Vx(x, ξ)P(ξ, x, t)) (14) where Dξ(ξ, x) = [ξλ++ (1−ξ)λ−]/2NandVξ=ξλ+−(1−ξ)λ−. Eq. (14) is a 2D diﬀusion-convection equation similar to a continuous mode l we proposed for motor protein movement (Qian, 1998a). One important consequence of this formulation is to realize that conformational ﬂuctuation of the enzyme, Vxcan not be independent of the substrate. This constitutes the essential idea of induced ﬁt (Koshland, 1958, Qian, 1998b, Qian and Hopﬁeld, 1996). For equilibrium ﬂuctuation , again reversibility (i.e., potential condition) dictates (Qian, 1998a): ∂Vx(x, ξ) ∂ξ=D∂ ∂x/parenleftBiggVξ(ξ, x) Dξ(ξ, x)/parenrightBigg =4ND(λ−λ′ +−λ+λ′ −)ξ(1−ξ) [ξλ++ (1−ξ)λ−]2(15) where λ′=dλ(x)/dx. Therefore, Vx(x, ξ) =−ξ (λ+−λ−)2+λ++λ− (λ+−λ−)3ln[λ+ξ+λ−(1−ξ)] +λ+λ− (λ+−λ−)3[λ+ξ+λ−(1−ξ)]+V0(x) (16) where V0(x) is an arbitrary function of xbut it is independent of ξ. As can be seen, ifλ−<< λ +, then there is no requirement for ξ-dependent Vx. Conclusions Biological macromolecules are the cornerstone of molecula r biology. Mathematical modeling of molecular processes requires a theoretical bas is upon which quantitative 9analyses can be carried out and rigorously compared with exp eriments. In this paper, a formal theory, we call stochastic macromolecular mechanics , is presented. The theory oﬀers a dynamic equation for describing the internal kinetics as well as external motion of macromolecules in aqueous solution at constant te mperature. Systemat- ically applying this theory to various biomolecular proces ses will bring molecular biophysics closer to the standard of theoretical physics, a nd hopefully in the near future the Smoluchowski equation will acquire the same towe ring stutus as that of Newton’s for mechanics, Euler’s for ﬂuid dynamics, Maxwell ’s for electrodynamics, Schr¨ odinger’s for quantum mechanics, and Boltzmann’s for statistical mechanics of isolated systems. Appendix I Let’s use the well-known linear death process (Taylor and Ka rlin, 1998) as an example to illustrate the continuous approximation for the discrete model: dPn(t) dt=−nλP n(t) + (n+ 1)λPn+1(t) (17) where Pn(t) is the probability of survival population being nat time t. The solution to this equation is well known (Taylor and Karlin, 1998) Pn(t) =N! n!(N−n)!e−nλt/parenleftBig 1−e−λt/parenrightBigN−n where Nis the total population at time t= 0. It is easy to show that the moments ∝an}bracketle{tn(t)∝an}bracketri}ht=Ne−λt, ∝an}bracketle{tn2(t)∝an}bracketri}ht ∝an}bracketle{tn(t)∝an}bracketri}ht2= 1 +1 N/parenleftBig eλt−1/parenrightBig , (18) ∝an}bracketle{tn3(t)∝an}bracketri}ht ∝an}bracketle{tn(t)∝an}bracketri}ht3= 1 +3(N−1) N2/parenleftBig eλt−1/parenrightBig +1 N2/parenleftBig e2λt−1/parenrightBig . We now consider the continuous counterpart of (17) with ξ=n/N: ∂P(ξ, t) ∂t=∂ ∂ξ(ξP(ξ, t)) which has solution P(ξ, t) =eλtδ/parenleftBig ξeλt−1/parenrightBig for initial condition P(ξ,0) =δ(ξ−1). The moments for ξare ∝an}bracketle{tξk(t)∝an}bracketri}ht=e−kλt. (19) 10Comparing (18) and (19), we note that the continous approxim ation is valid when theNis large and tis small. More precisely, ln N≫λt. Appendix II Let’s consider the following equation ∂u ∂t=D∂2u ∂x2+k∂ ∂x(xu)−(αx2+βx+γ)u In Gaussian form (Zwanzig, 1992) which is equivalent to path integral calculation (Wang and Wolynes, 1993) u(x, t) = [2πσ(t)]−1/2exp{ν(t)−[x−µ(t)]2/2σ2(t)}, and equate coeﬃcients of like order terms in xwe have dν/dt =−α[µ2(t) +σ2(t)]−βµ(t)−γ dµ/dt =−[k+ 2ασ2(t)]µ(t)−βσ2(t) dσ2/dt= 2D−2kσ2(t)−2ασ4(t) with initial condition σ2(0) = D/k,µ(0) = 0, and ν(0) = 0. We thus have σ2(t) = 2 D(ω+k) + (ω−k)e−2ωt (ω+k)2−(ω−k)2e−2ωt µ(t) =/parenleftBigg2βD ω/parenrightBigg−1 +e−ωt (ω+k)−(ω−k)e−ωt ν(t) =/parenleftBiggβ2D ω2−ω−k 2−γ/parenrightBigg t+4β2D ω(ω−k)/bracketleftBigg1 (ω+k)−(ω−k)e−ωt−1 2k/bracketrightBigg −1 2ln/bracketleftBigg(ω+k)2−(ω−k)2e−2ωt 4ωk/bracketrightBigg where ω2=k2+ 4Dα. References Agmon, N. & Hopﬁeld, J.J. (1983a) Transient kinetics of chem ical reactions with bounded diﬀusion perpendicular to the reaction coordinate: intram olecular processes with slow conformational changes. J. Chem. Phys. 78, 6947-6959. Agmon, N. & Hopﬁeld, J.J. (1983b) CO binding to heme proteins : a model for barrier height distributions and slow conformational changes. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 2042-2053. 11Astumian, R.D. (1997) Thermodynamics and kinetics of a Brow nian motor. Science ,276, 917-922. Blomberg, C. (1989) Beyond the ﬂuctuating enzyme: the Brown ian motion picture of internal molecular motion. J. Mol. Liquids ,42, 1-17. Chilkoti, A., Boland, T., Ratner, B.D. & Stayton, P.S. (1995 ) The Relationship between ligand-binding thermodynamics and protein-ligand intera ction forces measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 69, 2125-2130. Di Cera, E. (1991) Stochastic linkage: eﬀect of random ﬂuctu ations on a two-state process. J. Chem. Phys. ,95, 5082-5086. Elston, T., Wang, H.Y. & Oster, G. (1998) Energy transductio n in ATP synthase. Nature , 391, 510-513. Evans, E. & Richie, K. (1997) Dynamic strength of molecular a dhesion bonds. Biophys. J.72, 1541-1555. Evans, E. & Richie, K. (1999) Strength of a weak bond connecti ng ﬂexible polymer chains. Biophys. J. 76, 2439-2447. Florin, E., Moy, V.T. & Gaub, H.E. (1994) Adhesion forces bet ween individual ligand- receptor pairs. Science ,264, 415-417. Fox, R.F. (1978) Gaussian stochastic processes in physics. Phys. Reports ,48, 179-283. H¨ anggi, P., Talkner, P. & Borkovec, M. (1990) Reaction-rat e theory: ﬁfty years after Kramers. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251-341. Hill, T.L. (1977) Free Energy Transduction in Biology . New York: Academic Press. Hill, T.L. (1989) Free Energy Transduction and Biochemical Cycle Kinetics. New York: Springer-Verlag. Howard, J. (1996) The movement of kinesin along microtubule s.Ann. Rev. Physiol. 58, 703-729. J¨ ulicher, F., Ajdari, A. & Prost, J. (1997) Modeling molecu lar motors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1269-1281. Keizer, J. (1987) Statistical Thermodynamics of Nonequilibrium Processes . New York: Springer-Verlag. Kellermayer, M.S.Z., Smith, S.B., Granzier, H.L. & Bustama nte, C. (1997) Folding- unfolding transitions in single titin molecules character ized with laser tweezers. Sci- ence,276, 1112-1116. Koshland, D.E. (1958) Application of a theory of enzyme spec iﬁcity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA ,44, 98-104. 12Mackey, M.C. (1989) The dynamics origin of increasing entro py.Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 981-1015. McQuarrie, D.A. (1967) Stochastic approach to chemical kin etics. J. Appl. Prob. 4, 413-478. Moy, V.T., Florin, E. & Gaub, H.E. (1994) Intermolecular for ces and energetics between ligands and receptors. Science ,266, 257-259. Murray, J.D. (1993) Mathematical Biology. 2nd, corrected Ed. New York: Springer-Verlag. Peskin, C.S., Ermentrout, G.B. & Oster, G.F. (1994) The corr elation ratchet: A novel mechanism for generating directed motion by ATP hydrolysis . In: Cell Mechanics and Cellular Engineering (Mow, V.C., Guilak, F., Tran-Son-Tay, R. & Hochmuth, R.M. eds.), pp. 479-489. New York: Springer-Verlag. Qian, H. (1997) A simple theory of motor protein kinetics and energetics. Biophys. Chem. 67, 263-267. Qian, H. (1998a) Vector ﬁeld formalism and analysis for a cla ss of thermal ratchets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3063-3066. Qian, H. (1998b) Entropy-enthalpy compensation: conforma tional ﬂuctuation and induced- ﬁt.J. Chem. Phys. 109, 10015-10017. Qian, H. (2000a) A simple theory of motor protein kinetics an d energetics II. Biophys. Chem. 83, 35-43 (2000). Qian, H. (2000b) Single-particle tracking: Brownian dynam ics of viscoelastic materials. Biophys. J. in the press. Qian, H. (2000c) A mathematical analysis of the Brownian dyn amics of DNA tether. J. Math. Biol. in the press. Qian, H. (2000d) Mathematical formalism of Onsager’s theor y of linear irreversibility. To be published. Qian, H. & Elson, E.L. (1999) Quantitative study of polymer c onformation and dynamics by single-particle tracking. Biophys. J. 76, 1598-1605. Qian, H. & Hopﬁeld, J.J. (1996) Entropy-enthalpy compensat ion: perturbation and relax- ation in thermodynamic systems. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9292-9296. Qian, H. & Murray, J.D. (2000) A simple method of parameter sp ace determination for diﬀusion-driven instability with three species. App. Math. Lett. in the press. Qian, H. & Qian, M. (2000) Pumped biochemical reactions, non equilibrium circulation, and stochastic resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2271-2274. 13Qian, H. & Shapiro, B.E. (1999) A graphical method for force a nalysis: macromolecular mechanics with atomic force microscopy. Prot: Struct. Funct. Genet. 37, 576-581 (1999). Qian, M. & Zhang, B. (1984) Multi-dimensional coupled diﬀus ion process. Acta Math. Appl. Sinica ,1, 168-179. Qian, M.-P., Qian, M. & Gong, G.L. (1991) The reversibility a nd the entropy production of Markov Processes. Contemp. Math. 118, 255-261. Rief, M., Gautel, M., Oesterhelt, F., Fernandez, J.M. & Gaub , H.E. (1997) Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AF M.Science ,276, 1109- 1112. Sakmann, B. & Neher, E. (1995) Single-channel recording. 2nd Ed. New York: Plenum Press. Shapiro, B.E. & Qian, H. (1997) A quantitative analysis of si ngle protein-ligand complex separation with the atomic force microscope. Biophys. Chem. 67, 211-219. Shapiro, B.E. & Qian, H. (1998) Hysteresis in force probe mea surements: a dynamic systems perspective. J. Theoret. Biol. 194, 551-559. Taylor, H.M. & Karlin, S. (1998) An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling. 3rd Ed. Aca- demic Press, San Diego. Tskhovrebova, L., Trinick, J., Sleep, J.A. & Simmons, R.M. ( 1997) Elasticity and unfolding of single molecules of the giant muscle protein titin. Nature ,387, 308-312. van Kampen, N.G. (1997) Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. Revised and enlarged Ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Wang, H.Y. & Oster, G. (1998) Energy transduction in the F-1 m otor of ATP synthase. Nature ,396, 279-282. Wang, J. & P.G. Wolynes (1993) Passage through ﬂuctuating ge ometrical bottlenecks: The general Gaussian ﬂuctuating case. Chem. Phys. Lett. 212, 427-433. Wang, J. & P.G. Wolynes (1994) Survival paths for reaction dy namics in ﬂuctuating en- vironments. Chem. Phys. 180, 141-156. Wang, J. & P.G. Wolynes (1995) Intermittency of single molec ular reaction dynamics in ﬂuctuating environments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4317-4320. Xie, X.S. & Trautman, J.K. (1998) Optical studies of single m olecules at room temperature. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 49, 441-480. Xie, X.S. & Lu, H.P. (1999) Single-molecule enzymology. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15967- 15970. 14Zwanzig, R. (1988) Diﬀusion in a rough potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA ,85, 2029-2030. Zwanzig, R. (1992) Dynamical disorder: passage through a ﬂu ctuating bottleneck. J. Chem. Phys. 97, 3587-3589. 15
arXiv:physics/0007018v1 [physics.atm-clus] 10 Jul 2000Ionic and electronic structure of sodium clusters up to N=59 S. K¨ ummel1, M. Brack1, and P.-G. Reinhard2 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Regensbu rg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany e-mail: stephan.kuemmel/matthias.brack@physik.uni-re gensburg.de 2Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Erlangen , D-91077 Erlangen, Germany e-mail: reinhard@theorie2.physik.uni-erlangen.de (To appear Sept. 15 in Phys. Rev. B 62) We determined the ionic and electronic structure of sodium clusters with even electron numbers and 2 to 59 atoms in ax- ially averaged and three-dimensional density functional c al- culations. A local, phenomenological pseudopotential tha t reproduces important bulk and atomic properties and facil- itates structure calculations has been developed. Photoab - sorption spectra have been calculated for Na 2, Na8, and Na+ 9 to Na+ 59. The consistent inclusion of ionic structure consid- erably improves agreement with experiment. An icosahedral growth pattern is observed for Na+ 19to Na+ 59. This ﬁnding is supported by photoabsorption data. PACS: 36.40.Vz,31.15.Ew,71.15.H,36.40.Wa I. INTRODUCTION Since the pioneering experiments of Knight et al.1 and their interpretation in terms of the jellium model,2,3 sodium clusters have attracted great attention, both ex- perimentally and theoretically. This is due to the fact that sodium is the “simple metal” par excellence, and thus is best suited for the study of fundamental eﬀects. From photoabsorption experiments it is known that small sodium clusters have overall shapes that strongly vary with size and are determined by electronic shell eﬀects.4–8On the other hand, cold clusters with several thousand atoms build icosahedra,9i.e., they show ionic shell eﬀects, whereas the bulk material crystallizes in a bcc lattice. Recent experiments indicate that both ionic and electronic degrees of freedom play a role in deter- mining the structural and thermal properties of clusters with several tens of atoms.10 On the theoretical side, there have been diﬀerent ap- proaches to obtain an understanding of the delicate inter- play between ions and electrons that is the source of this variety. On one hand, relatively transparent models like the shell and jellium models in several levels of sophistica - tion have been widely used.2,3,11–16On the other hand, quantum chemistry and density functional theory oﬀer methods to study clusters on the highest level of sophis- tication presently possible. But ab initio calculations in the strictest sense, i.e., taking all electrons into accoun t, have only been performed for a few selected cases for the smallest clusters, due to the enormous computational ef- fort that they require.17–19Taking only the valence elec- trons into account reduces the complexity considerably,but the expense for searching low-energy conﬁgurations in three dimensions20–24still grows rapidly with the sys- tem size. The largest ab initio studies of sodium clusters to our knowledge are the recent ﬁnite-temperature inves- tigations presented in Refs. 25,26. Several models have been developed to bridge the gap between the ab initio calculations and the shell and jel- lium models. The ”Spherically Averaged Pseudopoten- tial Scheme” (SAPS) describes the ions by pseudopoten- tials, in most cases local ones, and the valence electrons are restricted to spherical symmetry.27Models based on a volume-averaged or perturbational treatment of ionic eﬀects28,29improve on the treatment of the elec- trons. Yet further approaches are the H¨ uckel and re- lated models,30,31molecular dynamics based on empiri- cal potentials,32and recently, also the extended Thomas- Fermi model combined with a local pseudopotential has been used to study sodium clusters.33,34 From the above examples, two points become clear that considerably facilitate systematical studies of clus - ters with more than twenty atoms. First, the fact that many calculations make use of phenomenological local pseudopotentials shows the importance of such poten- tials. This is especially true for sodium, where previous investigations16,35,36have shown that a local electron-ion interaction can be a good approximation. But especially in cluster physics, where one bridges the region between the atom and the bulk, it is important that a pseudopo- tential give reliable results for all sizes despite its loca lity. Second, one needs models that make it computationally manageable to calculate structures and optical properties of clusters systematically for a wide range of considerable sizes, but which on the other hand leave the underlying physics intact and are detailed enough so that relevant information can be drawn from them. Besides extending the computational range, such models will serve the even more important purpose to distill the dominant physical eﬀects from the wealth of details that fully ab initio cal- culations supply. The results of the model calculations of course must be veriﬁed in calculations of higher accu- racy and by comparison with experiment. These tasks are addressed in the present article. In Section II we develop a new phenomenological pseu- dopotential which meets the just mentioned require- ments. Detailed comparisons with ab initio calculations for the smallest clusters in section III verify the validity of the pseudopotential and an axially averaged density 1functional model37for structure calculations. In section IV, a systematic survey over structures and photoabsorp- tion spectra of Na clusters up to Na+ 59is given. The re- sults of the survey are summarized and discussed in the concluding section V. II. A LOCAL PSEUDOPOTENTIAL FOR STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS Rigorous pseudopotentials in the sense of Phillips and Kleinman38and modern ab initio pseudopotentials39,40 are always nonlocal. However, it has been noted early in the development of pseudopotential theory that by relaxing the Phillips-Kleinman condition, one can open up a new class of pseudopotentials.41These are also termed “model potentials” because they are constructed by choosing some analytical functions as models for the partial-wave potentials and adjusting their parameters such that some experimentally known quantities, e.g., atomic energy levels, are matched. If several partial- wave potentials can be chosen to be the same, one can construct a local model potential. In fact, such local phe- nomenological potentials have been and are being used successfully in many branches of physics, see, e.g., Refs. 29,34,35,42,43. However, the local approach can only be expected to be good for the so-called “nearly free elec- tron” metals whose atomic structure consists of only sor pelectrons outside of an ionic core with a noble gas con- ﬁguration. (Lithium, with its lack of pelectrons in the core, is the prominent exception.) In these metals, the two contributions making up the pseudopotential have a tendency to cancel each other, and the eﬀective poten- tial a valence electron experiences is further diminished by screening eﬀects. Therefore, model potentials have been proposed in the past which tried to exploit this simple electronic structure either by ﬁtting properties of the bulk solid,35,37,42,44or of the single atom,41or byad hocfulﬁlling desired numerical properties.33,45However, some of these potentials can lead to wrong predictions when they are used in physical surroundings diﬀerent from the one in which they were set up,46or when prop- erties other than the adjusted ones are looked at. With an emphasis on solid state properties, the last point has been discussed in detail previously, see, e.g., Ref. 35 for an overview. Our aim here is to develop a local model potential that gives a maximum degree of transferability in the sense that potentials constructed according to our scheme should reproduce the important physical proper- ties of a system, irrespectively of its number of atoms or the way in which these are arranged. A. The Ansatz The construction of a model potential consists of two steps. The ﬁrst is to choose the model function. It shouldallow for a physical interpretation of the ﬁnal potential, and at the same time should have analytical and numer- ical properties that allow for an easy application. The parameterization Vps(r) =−Ze2 r/braceleftbigg c1erf/parenleftbiggr√ 2σ1/parenrightbigg +c2erf/parenleftbiggr√ 2σ2/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg , (2.1) where erf(x) =2√π/integraldisplayx 0dyexp(−y2), (2.2) certainly meets the second requirement, since the error function can very eﬃciently be handled numerically47 and yields a smooth representation on a grid. That this parameterization also has a transparent physical inter- pretation will be demonstrated at the end of this sec- tion. The second step is the choice of the four parameters σ1,σ2,c1,c2. One necessary condition is that the correct Coulomb limit, lim r→∞Vps(r) =−Ze2 r, (2.3) be obtained, which requires c1+c2= 1. (2.4) Thus we are left with three free parameters. Since our aim is to construct a pseudopotential that gives reliable properties for all clusters, i.e., spanning the region from the atom to the bulk, the most important properties of both atom and bulk solid must be reproduced. There- fore, we have chosen to ﬁt the Wigner-Seitz radius rsand the compressibility Bof the crystalline metal, together with the energy of the atomic 3 slevelea. These quanti- ties characterize sodium and inﬂuence both structure and electronic excitations, thus being of great importance for reliable results. A test for whether we really have cap- tured the relevant physics will be to check if non-ﬁtted quantities (bond-lengths, atomic spectra, bulk binding, dipole resonances) are also reproduced correctly. B. Determination of basic properties We calculate the bulk properties in second-order per- turbation theory.35The unperturbed system is the nonin- teracting homogeneous gas of valence electrons, the per- turbation is given by the potentials arising from the crys- tal lattice and from the interaction of the electrons with each other. Each crystal ion is described by a pseudopo- tentialVpscentered on a lattice site. Up to second order, the binding energy per valence electron ebis given by eb(rs) =ekin(rs) +exc(rs) +eps1(rs) +eh(rs) +eii +ebs(rs). (2.5) 2Herers= [3/(4πn)]1 3is deﬁned in terms of the average valence electron density n, ekin(rs) =3/planckover2pi12 10m/parenleftbigg9π 4/parenrightbigg2 31 r2s(2.6) is the noninteracting kinetic energy, and exc(rs) is the exchange and correlation energy for which we have em- ployed the LDA functional of Perdew and Wang.48The quantity eps1(rs) =3 Z4πrs3/integraldisplay Vps(r)d3r (2.7) is the ﬁrst-order contribution of the pseudopotential to the binding energy, eh(rs) is the Hartree energy of the valence electron density, and eiiis the electrostatic energy of point ions. Finally, ebs(rs) is the band structure energy discussed below. Integrations are taken over the (inﬁnite) volume of the crystal. These contributions are rewritten as eps1(rs) +eh(rs) +eii(rs) = 3 Z4πr3s/integraldisplay/parenleftbigg Vps+Ze2 r/parenrightbigg d3r+ 3 Z4πr3s/integraldisplay/parenleftbiggVh 2−Ze2 r/parenrightbigg d3r+eii (2.8) to obtain the volume-averaged repulsive part of the pseu- dopotential that deﬁnes its strength Sps=/integraldisplay/parenleftbigg Vps+Ze2 r/parenrightbigg d3r, (2.9) and the total electrostatic energy of point ions in a compensating uniform negative background, called the Madelung energy em. Separating the Coulomb force into long and short-range components,49one can cal- culateem, and for the bcc lattice one obtains em= −0.895929Z2 3e2/rs. Thus the only characteristic50of the pseudopotential that enters the binding energy in ﬁrst- order perturbation theory is its strength Sps. For ﬁxing the radial dependence of the potential it is therefore es- sential to take into account the second-order band struc- ture energy ebs(rs) =1 23 Z24πr3s/summationdisplay q/negationslash=0/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle˜Vps(q)S(q)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2χ(q) ǫ(q).(2.10) In (2.10), S(q) =1 NN/summationdisplay j=1exp/parenleftbig −iqRj/parenrightbig (2.11) is the structure factor with the sum running over all ionic positions. For a lattice without basis one obtains S(q) = δq,K, where Kdenotes reciprocal lattice vectors, i.e., thesum in (2.10) is running over reciprocal lattice vectors only. Furthermore, χ(q) =−mkF 2π2/planckover2pi12/parenleftbigg 1 +1−η2 2ηln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1 +η 1−η/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/parenrightbigg , η=q 2kF (2.12) is the Lindhard function with kF= (3π2n)1 3, and ǫ(q) = 1−4πe2 q2(1− G(q))χ(q) (2.13) is the dielectric function including the local ﬁeld correc- tion G=−q2 4πe2d2 dn2(nexc[n]). (2.14) in the LDA. The pseudopotential enters via its Fourier transform, which for our potential is given by ˜Vps(q) =−4πe2Z q22/summationdisplay i=1ciexp/parenleftbigg −q2σ2 i 2/parenrightbigg . (2.15) From Eqs. (2.5) to (2.13) we calculate eb; the minimum ofebdetermines rs, and the bulk modulus is obtained from B=−V∂P ∂V=1 12πrs/parenleftbigg∂2eb ∂2rs−2 rs∂eb ∂rs/parenrightbigg .(2.16) The reciprocal lattice vectors are generated numerically from the reciprocal basis, and we carefully checked that in all calculations the sum over reciprocal lattice vectors was numerically converged. The atomic 3 slevel is the lowest eigenvalue eaof the Schr¨ odinger equation /parenleftbigg −∂2 ∂r2+l(l+ 1) r2+2m /planckover2pi12Vps(r)−2m /planckover2pi12ea/parenrightbigg u(r) = 0 (2.17) forl= 0, where the pseudo wavefunction has, as usual, been factorized into radial and angular compo- nents,ψ(r) = [u(r)/r]Ylm(ϑ,ϕ). At this point, a sub- tlety should be considered. The atomic energy calcu- lated within density functional theory using the LDA will slightly diﬀer from eadue to the well known fact that in the LDA, the self interactions in the Hartree and exchange energy do not cancel each other exactly and leave a spurious self interaction energy.51One therefore might be tempted to “compensate” this self-interaction energy by adjusting the pseudopotential parameters such that the experimental value is matched when the self- interaction energy is included. This, however, would be dangerous for several reasons. First, it must be recalled that for an accurate description of bonding properties, the pseudopotential must lead to an accurate description 3of the electronic density. If one adjusts the pseudopoten- tial parameters such that a spurious energy is compen- sated, then the valence electron density resulting from this pseudopotential might correspondingly show spuri- ous, unphysical deformations, leading to wrong bond- ing properties, as discussed previously.52Secondly, the self-interaction energy becomes smaller with increasing delocalization of the electrons. For an electron delocal- ized over a volume Ω, the self-interaction correction is of order53Ω−1 3. Since the valence electrons in metal clus- ters are delocalized to a high degree, and since the cluster volume changes noticeably in the size range from N=8 to N=58 that we are interested in, a compensation of the atomic self interaction energy via the pseudopoten- tial would lead to problems for increasing cluster sizes. And third, building the self-interaction energy into the pseudopotential would be inconsistent with the proce- dure of ﬁtting to the bulk, because the bulk calculation is less aﬀected by the self-interaction error due to the de- localization of the bulk electrons. Therefore, it is better to exactly solve Eq. (2.17). This can straightforwardly be done numerically by combining the Runge-Kutta method with adaptive stepsize control with a globally convergent Newton scheme. As a welcomed side eﬀect, our pseu- dopotential might also be usable in self-interaction free, i.e., beyond-LDA density functional calculations. C. Results and comparison The three free parameters of our model potential (2.1) were now chosen such that the experimental low- temperature value54rs= 3.93a0be reproduced exactly, while at the same time eaandBbe as close as possi- ble to the experimental values41ea=−0.378Ryand55 B= 0.073Mbar . These conditions lead to the parame- ters σ1= 0.681 a 0, c 1=−2.292, σ2= 1.163 a 0, c 2= 3.292. (2.18) In Table I we have listed the resulting rs,Bandea for our smooth-core pseudopotential and for other local pseudopotentials that have widely been used in cluster physics. The empty-core potential with both of the most frequently used choices for its cut-oﬀ radius rc, and the pseudopotential of Ref. 37 that was constructed in the same spirit and adjusted in ﬁrst-order perturbation the- ory only, lead to considerable deviations from the ex- perimental values for all quantities. The local Heine- Abarenkov potential29,42,43gives a reasonable rsand an eavery close to the experimental one, but 10% error in B. Our pseudopotential by construction gives no or only very small diﬀerences from the experimental values for rs, Bandea, showing that it is possible to obtain reason- able results for all these quantities with a local potential . However, a severe test will be whether also non-ﬁtted quantities are reproduced correctly. To this end, we havePseudopotential rs/a0 B/Mbar ea/eV Empty core, rc= 1.66a3.49 0.119 -5.52 Empty core, rc= 1.76b3.61 0.109 -5.32 Ref. 37 3.84 0.079 -5.31 Heine-Abarenkovc3.90 0.080 -5.12 Present work 3.93 0.074 -5.18 Experiment 3.93 0.073 -5.14 TABLE I. Equilibrium density rs, bulk modulus B, and atomic 3 slevelea, calculated for standard local pseudopoten- tials: (a) Ref. 44, (b) Ref. 27, and (c) Ref. 42,43,29. Bottom line: Experimental results. See text for details and refere nces for experimental values. calculated the bulk binding energy eb, the dimer bind- ing length ddimer, the zero of the pseudopotential form factor, given by q0=/radicalbig 2[ln(c2)−ln(−c1)]/(σ2 2−σ2 1) in our case, and the ﬁrst seven excited atomic energy levels. Table II shows that also these ten non-ﬁtted quantities come out very close to the measured values, revealing that the model potential deﬁned by (2.1), (2.18) indeed incorporates the relevant physical eﬀects. Present work Experiment eb/eV -6.19 -6.25 q0/(2kF) 0.92 0.87a/0.98b ddimer/a0 5.78 5.82 3s - 3p /eV 2.19 2.10 3s - 4s /eV 3.18 3.19 3s - 3d /eV 3.68 3.52 3s - 4p /eV 3.80 3.75 3s - 5s /eV 4.13 4.12 3s - 4d /eV 4.33 4.29 3s - 5p /eV 4.39 4.35 TABLE II. Left column: Bulk binding energy ebfrom per- turbation theory; normalized zero of the form factor q0/(2kF); dimer binding length ddimercalculated with our smooth-core pseudopotential and CAPS; valence electron excitation ene r- gies for our pseudopotential. Right column: Measured bulk binding energy;56semi-empirical values for q0/(2kF) from op- tical properties (a) and from elastic constants (b), see Ref . 57 for a discussion; dimer binding length;58and energy level dif- ferences as obtained from spectroscopic lines.59 Fig. 1 shows our pseudopotential in real and in Fourier space, leading us back to the question of the motivation for the ansatz (2.1). From Eq. (2.4), one can interpret the coeﬃcients c1andc2as the charges associated with the attractive and repulsive terms, respectively, in the pseu- dopotential. This interpretation becomes more transpar- ent when one looks at the corresponding pseudocharge density. The pseudocharge npsis related to the pseu- dopotential via Poisson’s equation △Vps(r) = 4πe2nps(r), (2.19) and for our pseudopotential is given by 4-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.200.20.40.60.81 00.511.522.533.544.55 r/a0V(r) Ry -6-4-202468 0 1 2 3 4 5 q/a0-1V(q) Rya∼ 03 FIG. 1. The smooth-core pseudopotential in real and Fourier space. nps(r) =n1exp/parenleftbigg −r2 2σ12/parenrightbigg +n2exp/parenleftbigg −r2 2σ22/parenrightbigg ,(2.20) where ni=ci/parenleftbig 2πσi2/parenrightbig−3 2fori= 1,2. (2.21) Thus, our parameterization describes the ionic core by two overlapping Gaussian charge densities. The diﬀerent heights and widths of the Gaussians result in a pseudo- density that is negative for small distances, correspond- ing to a repulsive core, and has a positive tail that com- pensates the core for larger distances. Equation (2.20) thus is a generalization of the parameterization that was used in our previous studies,46where the pseudodensity has a two step-proﬁle. Besides its transparent physical in- terpretation, the pseudopotential (2.1) has excellent nu- merical properties: in real space the potential is smooth with no extreme peaks and can very eﬃciently be han- dled numerically via the pseudodensity, allowing to solve the Coulomb problem for electrons and ions together. At the same time, its rapidly converging Fourier transform makes the potential equally well suited for calculations in reciprocal space. III. COMPARISON WITH AB INITIO RESULTS In the present work we have employed the “Cylindri- cally Averaged Pseudopotential Scheme” (CAPS), whichhas been introduced earlier37,46and which has been mod- iﬁed and improved for the present purposes. Since CAPS treats the electronic degrees of freedom in the Kohn- Sham formalism without limiting them to spherical sym- metry, explicitly includes the ionic structure, and fur- thermore is numerically eﬃcient, it is a very good tool for systematical studies of the interplay between ions and electrons. But before CAPS and the smooth-core pseu- dopotential are applied on a large scale, we further test their usefulness for cluster structure calculations. That the smooth core pseudopotential reproduces the experimentally known dimer bond length has already been shown in Table II. For the next larger clusters, no direct experimental information on structures or bond lengths is available, and we therefore resort to compar- isons with other theoretical work. Fig. 2 shows the four smallest Na clusters with even electron numbers as they are obtained in CAPS with the smooth core pseudopo- tential. For these clusters, also three-dimensional geom- etry optimizations have been performed using ab initio pseudopotentials and Hartree-Fock with conﬁguration in- teraction (CI)17,23, or DFT with the LDA20,21for the valence electrons, respectively. Also all-electron Hartr ee- Fock calculations have been reported.17,60CAPS ﬁnds exactly the same structures as the three-dimensional methods, and this in spite of the fact that the ionic conﬁgurations of Na 4and Na+ 5might let the cylindri- FIG. 2. Ground state structures for Na+ 3, Na+ 5, Na 4 and Na 6as obtained in CAPS with the smooth core pseudopotential. The numbers report the bond lengths ina0, where the uppermost values in each column are from the present work, the ones in square brackets from Hartree-Fock/CI calculations,23,17the ones in parentheses from DFT with LDA,20,21and the ones in braces from all-electron Hartree-Fock calculations.17,60 5cal averaging seem a rather far-fetched approximation. But not only the overall geometry, also the bond lengths are in good agreement with the ones from the three- dimensional calculations. Whereas all-electron Hartree- Fock overestimates bond lengths due to missing correla- tion eﬀects, the three-dimensional LDA calculations lead to the well-known underestimation. By construction, the phenomenological pseudopotential compensates this un- derestimation, and it is thus reassuring to see that the resulting bond lengths are close to the ones found in the quantum chemistry calculations. Three-dimensional cal- culations have been performed for a few other neutral clusters,22and CAPS is in agreement with the three- dimensional geometries in these cases, too. A detailed analysis of structures of neutral clusters and their static electric polarizability can be found in Ref. 61. A further test for structure calculations is obtained by comparing the photoabsorption spectra corresponding to the theoretically determined structures to the measured ones. To this end, we have calculated the valence elec- tron excitations for our cluster structures in a collective approach. The basic idea of this method has been pre- sented earlier,62,63and a detailed discussion of its exten- sions and the relation to density functional theory is the subject of a forthcoming publication.64Here, we demon- strate the validity of our collective model for the test cases Na 2and Na 8, where experimental data and recent ab initio TDLDA calculations are available for compar- ison. The ﬁrst row of plots in Fig. 3 shows the exci- tation spectra obtained with the axial collective model for the CAPS structures shown in the insets, the sec- Na8 0 1 2 3 4 eVNa2 0 1 2 3Experimentσ FIG. 3. Photoabsorption cross section σin arbitrary units against energy in eV for Na 2and Na 8. From top to bottom: present results for the CAPS structure shown in the inset, TDLDA calculations for the corresponding three-dimension al structures,70experimental spectra.65,66The TDLDA and col- lective model results have been broadened by 0.06 eV to sim- ulate the ﬁnite line width of the experiment.ond row shows the TDLDA spectra for the correspond- ing three-dimensional geometries, and the bottom row shows the experiment.65,66The lower two rows were di- rectly adapted from Ref. 70, and the collective model re- sults were then plotted on the same scale. Besides small diﬀerences in the two small peaks seen at high energies for Na 2, the agreement between the three sets of data is very good. This demonstrates that our collective model is capable of correctly describing excitations even in smal l systems. It further is to be noticed that the excitation energies obtained with the smooth-core pseudopotential are≈0.15 eV lower than the TDLDA energies and closer to the experimental ones, which can be attributed to the larger bond lengths that result with the present pseu- dopotential. IV. STRUCTURES AND PHOTOABSORPTION SPECTRA OF SINGLY-CHARGED CATIONIC SODIUM CLUSTERS Since the comparisons in the previous section have shown that the phenomenological pseudopotential, the collective model and CAPS are well suited for the de- scription of sodium clusters, a systematic study of clus- ters with even electron numbers between 8 and 58 is pre- sented. For each cluster a great number of simulated an- nealing runs was started from diﬀerent random conﬁgura- tions. The search was continued until new runs no longer returned new low-energy structures. Although it must always be kept in mind that no practical algorithm guar- antees that all low-energy structures are found, this ex- tensive and unbiased procedure at least gives good hope to do so. The aim of this survey is to investigate how elec- tronic and ionic shell eﬀects play together in determining the cluster structure, and thus gain a better understand- ing of how matter grows. The geometry optimization was done with CAPS, but the energies of the resulting struc- tures have also been obtained in three-dimensional Kohn- Sham calculations to check the ordering of isomers with- out axial restriction. Photoabsorption spectra are cal- culated with the collective model, and comparison with the experimental spectra gives further information on the relevant structures. The “magic” cluster Na+ 9is spherical according to the jellium model, and the ground state found with CAPS is the C4vstructure (a) in Fig. 4. Separated by 0.10 eV, CAPS ﬁnds the D4disomer (b), and both these geometries were also found in three-dimensional CI and LDA calculations.18,45In addition, CAPS ﬁnds the third isomer (c) which is higher by 0.23 eV. All these clusters have nearly spherical valence electron den- sities, and therefore support the shell model picture. But the ionic conﬁgurations are, of course, non-spherical, and this is reﬂected in the photoabsorption cross sec- tions. The ﬁrst thing to be noted is the overall po- sition of the resonance, about which there has been a long-standing debate.2,14,15,24,29,68,69In previous work46 6FIG. 4. Low-energy conﬁgurations for Na+ 9, and corre- sponding photoabsorption spectra from the collective mode l. A phenomenological Lorentzian line broadening of width 0.0 8 eV has been applied. Dotted curve: experimental cross sec- tion for T=105 K.71,76 we have shown that when ionic structure is taken into account via a pseudopotential, the detailed form of the potential greatly inﬂuences the resonance position. But whereas our previous calculations were mainly compared to high-temperature data, and, due to limited collec- tive model basis sets, ﬁxed the resonance positions only within a few percent (as pointed out in Ref. 46), we have now fully converged the basis. The resulting overall res- onance positions are very close to the experimental low- temperature positions, showing that consistent inclusion of ionic structure gets the plasmon position in the cor- rect energy interval. The optical response of Na+ 9has also been theoretically investigated previously,18,23,29,45 and each of these calculations explains the experimental spectrum on the basis of a diﬀerent isomer. In our calcu- lations, the spectra of isomers (b) and (c) both reproduce the splitting of the main peak seen in the experiment. Isomer (a) does not show this feature, but it leads to the small sub-peak around 3.5 eV that is also seen experi- mentally. The situation becomes transparent when the results from our three-dimensional calculations, see Ta- ble III, are taken into account. They show that isomer (c) is degenerate with isomer (a), and the experimental spectrum can thus be explained even at low tempera- tures as resulting from a mixture of isomers (a) and (c). (The importance of isomerism on dipole spectra in small sodium clusters has also been pointed out in Ref. 73.) The lowest energy structure that we ﬁnd for Na+ 11(D4d, labeled (a) in Fig. 5) can be understood as resulting from placing one atom in the center of Na 10, or capping iso- mer (b) of Na+ 9on the quadratic faces. Separated by 0.11 eV and 0.19 eV, respectively, CAPS ﬁnds the D3h isomer (b), and its deformed counterpart (c), which is only a shallow local minimum in CAPS and easily trans- forms into the more stable structure (b). In the three- dimensional calculations, the ordering of isomers is re- versed: (b) becomes the ground state, and our results FIG. 5. Low-energy conﬁgurations for Na+ 11. See text for a discussion of photoabsorption spectra. are thus consistent with the ﬁndings of Ref. 23. We have calculated the photoabsorption spectra with the collec- tive model and obtain two resonances with heights ap- proximately 1:2 for all three geometries. These are cen- tered at 2.41/2.94 eV for structure (a), at 2.39/2.94 eV for structure (b), and at 2.27/2.98 eV for structure (c). The experimental photoabsorption spectrum72of Na+ 11 at 380 K shows two broad peaks with heights 1:2 around 2.2 eV and 2.85 eV, and a pattern of six peaks when mea- sured at 35 K: three low intensity ones at 1.9 eV, 2.2 eV and 2.4 eV, and three high intensity ones at 2.5 eV, 2.8 eV and 3.0 eV. Obviously, the calculated resonances are blue shifted by a few percent with respect to the hot ex- periment. This is understandable since the calculations have been done for T=0 K, and thermal expansion of the cluster shifts the plasmon to slightly lower energies. (This eﬀect has recently been put into evidence quantita- tively for the static response.74) When compared to the cold data, the calculated resonances are in the correct energy range, but the ﬁne structure that the experiment shows is not reproduced. A CI calculation23based on iso- mer (b) reproduced some of the experimentally observed patterns, but also could not explain all the peaks, and re- cent three-dimensional TDLDA calculations75have lead to similar results as the collective model. An explana- tion of all details in the experimental spectrum therefore might require to consider a mixture of low-energy struc- tures, and this will be discussed in detail in a separate publication.75 For Na+ 15CAPS ﬁnds four low-energy structures. The two lowest ones, (a) and (b) in Fig. 6, are very close in energy in both CAPS and the three-dimensional calcula- tions. (a) corresponds to a distorted Na+ 11(a) with four atoms added along the z-axis, and (b) can be understood as a pentagonal bipyramid sharing one ion with Na+ 9(a). Structure (c) results from structure (a) by moving one of the inner single atoms to the bottom face, and the oblate (d) corresponds to a conﬁguration found31,61for Na 14, but with one atom added along the symmetry axis. In agreement with the experimental photoabsorption spec- trum, our results point to prolate clusters as the relevant structures and thus again verify the prediction of the de- formed, structure averaged jellium model (SAJM).77,7 7FIG. 6. Low-energy conﬁgurations and photoabsorption spectra for Na+ 15. A phenomenological Lorentzian line broad- ening of width 0.2 eV has been applied. Dotted curve: exper- imental cross section.76 The ground state structure found for Na+ 17, (a) in Fig. 7, is close to the one found in the extended H¨ uckel model for the neutral cluster.31It consists of an icosahedral core with a crown of four atoms, and the only diﬀerence to the result of Ref. 31 is that the cylindrical averaging forces the crown atoms into a square. This shows that for such sizes the diﬀerences between charged and neutral clus- ters can already be small. Structure (b), which is slightly higher in energy than (a) in the three-dimensional calcu- lations, has an even more prolate valence electron den- sity, and the collective resonances for these clusters lie a t 2.59 eV and 2.86 eV [structure (a)] and at 2.34 eV and 2.95 eV [structure (b)]. They are thus in contrast to the experimental spectrum that points to an oblate cluster. CAPS ﬁnds one more isomer, structure (c), that indeed leads to an oblate valence electron density. In CAPS, it FIG. 7. Low-energy conﬁgurations for Na+ 17, and pho- toabsorption spectrum for isomer (c). A phenomenological Lorentzian line broadening of width 0.22 eV has been applied . Dotted curve: experimental cross section.76is 0.16 eV higher than (a), with a half occupied orbital. The collective spectrum for this isomer is very close to the experimental one, as shown in Fig. 7. However, also the three-dimensional calculation gives a non-negligible energy diﬀerence between (c) and the prolate isomers, cf. Table III. Therefore, in this case a three-dimensional re- laxation of the ions would be necessary to check whether Jahn-Teller distortions lower the energy of isomer (c) so much that it can account for the experimental spectrum. For Na+ 19CAPS ﬁnds the four stable geometries shown in Fig. 8. The double-icosahedron (a) is the ground state, and it is separated from structure (b) by 0.23 eV, from (c) by 0.30 eV, and from (d) by 0.35 eV. However, in the calculations without axial restriction, the energetic diﬀerences are considerably reduced: isomer (d) becomes equivalent to isomer (b), and both are separated from the ground state by only 0.12 eV. The experimental photoab- sorption spectrum sheds further light on the situation. It shows a high peak at about 2.7 eV, followed by a lower one at about 2.9 eV, and is thus very similar to the col- lective spectrum of isomer (d). The spectra of the other isomers all give the peaks in reversed order and thus do not resemble the experiment. (The collective spectrum of (c), which is not shown in order not to overload Fig. 8, shows a small peak at 2.84 eV and a higher one at 2.93 eV.) Since an internal cluster temperature of about 60 K is suﬃcient to go from isomer (a) to (d), and since the temperature in the experiment is about 105 K, it is FIG. 8. Low-energy conﬁgurations and photoabsorption spectra for Na+ 19. A phenomenological Lorentzian line broad- ening of width 0.15 eV has been applied. Dotted curve: ex- perimental cross section.76 8plausible that isomer (d) will contribute to the spectrum. The experimental spectrum however looks as if it is domi- nated by isomer (d). One explanation for this can be that structure (d) has a larger “catchment area” than (a) and is entropically favored. The second possibility, which is suggested by the relatively large diﬀerence between the energy found in CAPS and the three-dimensional calcu- lation, is that a three-dimensional relaxation of the ions would turn structure (d) into the ground state. FIG. 9. Low-energy conﬁgurations and photoabsorption spectra for Na+ 21. A phenomenological Lorentzian line broad- ening of width 0.15 eV has been applied. Dotted curve: ex- perimental cross section.71 Two degenerate structures are found for Na+ 21in CAPS, and also the three-dimensional calculation leads to nearly equal energies. Structure (a) results from the double icosahedron of Na+ 19(a) by adding one ion to each of the lower tow pentagons, and (b) results from (a) by moving the lowest ion to the uppermost pentagon. Both geometries lead to collective spectra with two main tran- sitions and some strength above the main resonances. This is in agreement with the experimental data71,76that also show this high-energy tail. Concerning the main transitions, the two isomers are somewhat diﬀerent: in structure (a) the main peaks are separated by about 0.1 eV, whereas they nearly fall together for structure (b). Since the structures are extremely close in total energy and since the main peaks of (b) energetically fall exactly between the main peaks of (a), the experimental spec- trum can consistently be explained as resulting from a mixture of both isomers. The simulations performed for Na+ 25led to strongly prolate shapes. This is partially understandable on the basis of the SAJM:7the valence electrons force the clus- ter into the prolate regime. But the inclusion of ionic structure even enhances the prolate tendency, because the lowest conﬁguration, shown in Fig. 10, is a triple icosahedron, and in order to build this conﬁguration, a quadrupole moment larger than the jellium prediction is necessary. From this observation it also becomes clear FIG. 10. CAPS ground-state conﬁguration and photoab- sorption spectrum for Na+ 25. A phenomenological Lorentzian line broadening of width 0.25 eV has been applied. Dotted curve: experimental cross section.76 that the pentagonal bipyramid which has been observed as a building block of the smaller clusters18,22,31is also important for the larger sizes. For the triple icosahe- dron, collective resonances are observed at 2.44 eV and 2.96 eV, and also the experiments6,76indicate peaks at these energies. But the latter shows an additional peak around 2.75 eV which is not found in the calculations. Comparing this to the situation encountered46for Na+ 27 shows that the geometries of the two clusters are closely related: Na+ 27is the triple icosahedron with two atoms added to the central pentagons. This shows the con- sistency of the structure calculations, and for Na+ 27the collective spectrum nicely matches with the experimen- tal data. The triple icosahedron is energetically strongly favored over the other structures that CAPS ﬁnds. All of them are variations of the ground state geometry with local distortions, and a three-dimensional calculation wa s performed for the structure that in CAPS is the second lowest. Here, the diﬀerence in total energy is a little smaller than in CAPS, but still large, cf. Table III. Since furthermore all low-energy structures give rise to collec- tive spectra that are similar to the one shown in Fig. 10, the explanation for the middle peak observed for Na+ 25 remains an open question. Comparing the structures of Na+ 25and Na+ 27to the ones found for Na+ 31, Na+ 41and Na+ 43(Fig. 11, Fig. 12, and Refs. 25,46) allows to identify a growth pattern: the triple icosahedron serves as a building block for the larger clusters. Additional atoms are added on outside faces, as seen in the ground states of Na+ 27and Na+ 43, or can be packed between the pentagonal subunits, as observed for the isomers of Na+ 27, where the two additional ions are placed at diﬀerent positions “inside” the Na+ 25structure. The collective spectra of the low-energy structures (a) – (c) of Na+ 31reﬂect the prolate electron densities of these clusters and show one peak around 2.6 eV, carrying about 30% oscillator strength, another one around 2.95 eV car- rying about 50% strength, and the rest of the strength scattered at higher energies. Structure (d) is not stable against Jahn Teller distortions in three dimensions. In 9FIG. 11. Low-energy conﬁgurations for Na+ 31. view of the cluster size, the CAPS diﬀerences in total en- ergy for Na+ 31are rather small, and they are even smaller in the three-dimensional approach. Since the temper- ature in the measurement of the photoabsorption cross section was again at least 105 K, it can be concluded from the calculations that a variety of isomers will contribute to the experimental spectrum. It is thus not astonishing that the available experimental data6,76do not resolve separated peaks but show a rather broad bump. FIG. 12. CAPS ground state conﬁguration and photoab- sorption spectrum for Na+ 43. A phenomenological Lorentzian line broadening of width 0.15 eV has been applied. Dotted curve: experimental cross section.76 The pronounced deformation seen for Na+ 43in Fig. 12 results from an interplay between ions and valence elec- trons. The electrons “push” the cluster into the octupole, i.e. pear-shaped form, and the ions arrange under this “constraint”. But the ions favor the icosahedral core, and this increases the deformation. The octupole moment therefore is larger by a factor 1.15 than in the SAJM.77 The photoabsorption spectrum calculated for Na+ 43shows a strong peak at 2.7 eV, followed by a high-energy tail. It is in close agreement with the experimental data, which thus support our structure calculations. Based on the shell and deformed jellium model a con- ﬁguration would be expected for Na+ 55that gives rise to a prolate valence electron density. The CAPS calculations, however, consistently led to nearly spherical or slightly oblate clusters as low-energy conﬁgurations. The low- est energy was found for structure (a) in Fig. 13. It FIG. 13. Low-energy conﬁgurations and corresponding photoabsorption spectra for Na+ 55. A phenomenological Lorentzian line broadening of width 0.17 eV has been ap- plied. Dotted curve: experimental cross section.76See text for a discussion of further experiments.78 has a ﬁvefold symmetry axis and again shows the close- to-icosahedral core discussed previously. Within 0.4 eV structures (b) and (c) are found with valence electron densities that are more oblate. These structures show half-occupied highest orbitals, indicating that they woul d Jahn-Teller relax if the axial restriction on the electrons were lifted. The lowest prolate isomer that was found, structure (d), has a quadrupole moment that is close to the one predicted by the SAJM7but in CAPS this con- ﬁguration is 0.73 eV higher than the ground state. The annealing was also started from an icosahedron with the nearest-neighbor distance of bulk sodium. In this cal- culation, the strictly geometrical icosahedron transform s into structure (a), which can be regarded as a slightly distorted icosahedron. The experimental photoabsorp- tion spectrum of Na+ 55as measured by the Freiburg group is shown in the lowest panel of Fig. 13, and the spec- trum has also been measured by Meibom et al.78Both spectra have in common that one broad peak is seen, fol- lowed by a second, smaller peak or a high-energy shoul- der. This is in contrast to the prediction of the jellium model, because the prolate structures found there give 10the peaks in reversed order, similar to the spectrum of isomer (d). The CAPS low-energy structures, however, lead to collective spectra with a high peak followed by a lower one, and are thus in better agreement with the experiment. The total oscillator strength measured in the experiment78was 70% - 80%. This also agrees with the collective model calculations that ﬁnd 79% strength within the plotted range for structure (a), 76% for (b) and 80% for (c). As a test for the collective model, a TDLDA calculation with excitation in z-direction was performed for structure (a). In the TDLDA, the high- energy shoulder is more pronounced than in the collective model. To further clear up the situation, the structures (a), (b) and (d) were relaxed in Born-Oppenheimer ab initio molecular dynamics,79i.e., fully three-dimensional with the Troullier-Martins pseudopotential.80The bond lengths of all three structures shrinked by a few percent due to the diﬀerent pseudopotential, and isomers (b) and (d) distorted slightly, but otherwise the geometries staye d unaltered. As seen in Table III, the diﬀerences in total energy are somewhat smaller in the ab initio calculations, but the ordering of isomers is the same as in CAPS. Fi- nally, as reported in Ref. 26, the CAPS structure (a) was annealed for 10 ps at about 220 K. In this annealing, the cluster became even more similar to an icosahedron and its overall shape oscillated around the nearly spherical shape of the icosahedron. Thus, the ab initio calcula- tions conﬁrm the ﬁnding that in contrast to the deformed jellium model prediction, Na+ 55at low to moderate tem- peratures has a close to spherical valence electron density . The CAPS results for Na+ 57, see Fig. 14, are consistent with the results for Na+ 55: again the low-energy structures are not prolate, but spherical or slightly oblate. The col- lective spectra somewhat underestimate the high-energy shoulder, and this can be attributed to selective particle- hole eﬀects just as in the case of Na+ 55. But the over- all agreement with experiment78,76is considerably better than in the deformed-jellium calculation. Structure (a) has the lowest energy, followed by isomers (b) and (c) that are higher by 0.22 eV. For structure (c) we observe a half-occupied orbital. With respect to the ionic geom- etry, structure (a) is similar to the third isomer of Na+ 55, and (c) corresponds to the ground state of Na+ 55with the two additional ions added on top and bottom faces. An- other isomer, not shown in Fig. 14 for the sake of clarity, is found, and there the two additional ions are added in the equatorial plane of Na+ 55(a). In the case of Na+ 59the search for low-energy structures has not been as exhaustive as for the other clusters. But several annealing runs were started from random conﬁg- urations, and the low-energy geometries that were found again showed the ions arranged rather regularly and sim- ilar to the structures just discussed. Therefore, further simulations were started from the geometries found for Na+ 55and Na+ 57, plus four or two atoms, respectively, that were added at randomly chosen sites. One of these runs led to a geometry that corresponds to Na+ 57(a), capped by two atoms on top and bottom. This structure has the FIG. 14. Low-energy conﬁgurations and corresponding photoabsorption spectra for Na+ 57. A phenomenological Lorentzian line broadening of width 0.17 eV has been ap- plied. Dotted curve: experimental cross section.76See text for a discussion of further experiments.78 lowest energy of all that were found, and it does not show signs of Jahn-Teller instability. The comparison between the experimental76and theoretical photoabsorption spec- tra ﬁts into the previous discussion. The strongest collec- tive resonance is seen at 2.8 eV, followed by a smaller one at 2.9 eV and a little strength scattered around 3.25 eV, i.e., the collective model leads to qualitative agreement with the experimental data. V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The systematic survey showed that for most of the smaller Na clusters, the overall deformation is determined by electronic shell eﬀects even when the ionic structure is explicitly included. This explains the great success of the deformed jellium model. However, the survey at the same time clearly exhibits the limitations of the jellium picture. Besides the fact that some spectroscopic pat- terns, e.g., as seen for Na+ 9, are directly related to details in the ionic conﬁguration, the fundamental improvement brought about by taking into account the ionic struc- ture is that growth systematics can be identiﬁed. In the smallest clusters, the pentagonal bipyramid is a fre- quently appearing structure and is seen, e.g., in Na+ 7, Na+ 15, Na+ 17. In Na+ 19, three of these smallest units are combined to build up the double icosahedron, and from 11then on, the electronic shell eﬀects and the preference of the ionic structure for icosahedral geometries work hand in hand in determining the cluster structure. This is seen most impressively for Na+ 43. At Na+ 55, however, the situa- tion changes. Due to the ionic shell closing, the inﬂuence of the ions wins over the electronic shell eﬀects, resulting in nearly spherical structures. This ﬁnding is supported by the experimental photoabsorption data and has been veriﬁed in ab initio calculations. In summary, we have presented a local pseudopoten- tial for sodium that accurately models the core-valence interaction and correctly describes the atom, the bulk, and ﬁnite clusters. We have demonstrated the inﬂuence of pseudopotentials on structural properties and the di- rect inﬂuence of the bond lengths on the resonance po- sitions. This shows that even for the most simple metal, a pseudopotential must be constructed carefully. Cluster structures were calculated in axially averaged and three- dimensional Kohn-Sham calculations. A detailed com- parison with ab initio work demonstrated the validity of the CAPS as a tool for the approximate determina- tion of cluster conﬁgurations. The systematical survey for clusters with up to 59 ions revealed an icosahedral growth pattern. Collective resonances were calculated for the theoretically determined structures, and compar- ison with the experimental photoabsorption spectra con- ﬁrmed the results of our structure calculations. Thus, a distinct step in the growing process of matter has been put into evidence, namely the transition from electroni- cally to ionically determined conﬁgurations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank J. Akola for the communication of his results prior to publication, and one of us (S. K¨ ummel) further acknowledges stimulating discussions with A. Aguado and F. Calvo. This work has been partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. 1W. D. Knight, K. Clemenger, W. A. de Heer, W. A. Saun- ders, M. Y. Chou, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2141 (1984). 2W. Ekardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1925 (1984). 3D. E. Beck, Phys. Rev. B 30(1984) 6935. 4W. Ekardt and Z. Penzar, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1322, (1991). 5K. Selby, V. Kresin, J. Masui, M. Vollmer, W. A. de Heer, A. Scheidemann, and W. D. Knight, Phys. Rev. B 43, 4565, (1991). 6J. Borggreen, P. Chowdhury, N. Kebaili, L. Lundsberg- Nielsen, K. L¨ utzenkirchen, M. B. Nielsen, J. Pedersen, and H. D. Rasmussen, Phys. Rev. B 48, 17507, (1993).7T. Hirschmann, B. Montag, and J. Meyer, Z. Phys. D 37, 63 (1996). 8H. H¨ akkinen, J. Kohlemainen, M. Koskinen, P. O. Lipas, and M. Manninen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1034, (1997). 9T. P. Martin, Phys. Reports 273, 201 (1996). 10M. Schmidt, R. Kusche, W. Kronm¨ uller, B. v. Issendorf, and H. Haberland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 99 (1997). 11K. Clemenger, Phys. Rev. B 32, 1359 (1985). 12M. Manninen, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6886 (1986). 13G. F. Bertsch and D. Tom´ anek, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2749 (1989). 14M. Brack, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 677 (1993). 15M. Madjet, C. Guet, and W. R. Johnson, Phys. Rev. B 51, 1327 (1995). 16F. Alasia, Ll. Serra, R. A. Broglia, N. Van Giai, E. Lip- parini, and H. E. Roman, Phys. Rev. B 52, 8488 (1995). 17V. Bonaˇ cic-Kouteck´ y, P. Fantucci, and J. Kouteck´ y, Phys . Rev. B 37, 4369 (1988). 18V. Bonaˇ cic-Kouteck´ y, P. Fantucci, and J. Kouteck´ y, Chem . Rev.91, 1035 (1991). 19J. Guan, M. E. Casida, A. M. K¨ oster, and D. R. Salahub, Phys. Rev. B 52, (1995) 2184. 20J. L. Martins, J. Buttet, and R. Car, Phys. Rev. B 31, 1804 (1985). 21I. Moullet, J. L. Martins, F. Reuse, and J. Buttet, Phys. Rev. B 42, 11589 (1990). 22U. R¨ othlisberger and W. Andreoni, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 8129 (1991). 23V. Bonaˇ cic-Kouteck´ y, J. Pittner, C. Fuchs, P. Fantucci, M. F. Guest, and J. Kouteck´ y, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1427 (1996). 24A. Rubio, J. A. Alonso, X. Blase, L. C. Balb´ as, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 247 (1996). 25A. Rytk¨ onen, H. H¨ akkinen, and M. Manninen, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3940 (1998); Eur. Phys. J. D 9, 451 (1999). 26J. Akola, A. Rytk¨ onen, H. H¨ akkinen, and M. Manninen, Eur. Phys. J. D 8, 93 (2000). 27M. P. I˜ niguez, M. J. Lopez, J. A. Alonso, and J. M. Soler, Z. Phys. D 11, 163 (1989); G. Borstel et al., inLecture Notes in Physics , edited by R. Schmidt, H. O. Lutz and R. Dreizler (Springer, Berlin, 1992), Vol. 404. 28J. A. Alonso, A. Rubio, and L. C. Balbas, Phil. Mag. B 69, 1037 (1994). 29W.D. Sch¨ one, W. Ekardt, and J. M. Pacheco, Phys. Rev. B50, 11079 (1994); Z. Phys. D 36, 65 (1996). 30R. Poteau and F. Spiegelmann, Phys. Rev. B 45, 1878 (1992). 31R. Poteau and F. Spiegelmann, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 6540 (1993). 32F. Calvo and F. Spiegelmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2270 (1999). 33P. Blaise, S. A. Blundell, and C. Guet, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15856 (1997). 34A. Aguado, J. M. L´ opez, J. A. Alonso, and M. J. Stott, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6026 (1999). 35C. Fiolhais, J. P. Perdew, S. Q. Armster, J. M. MacLaren, and M. Brajczewska, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14001 (1995); Phys. Rev. B 53, 13193 (1996). 36S. A. Blundell and C. Guet, Z. Phys. D 33, 153 (1995). 37B. Montag and P.-G. Reinhard, Z. Phys. D 33, 265 (1995). 1238J. C. Phillips and L. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. 116, 287 (1959). 39G. B. Bachelet, D. R. Haman, and M. Schl¨ uter, Phys. Rev. B26, 4199 (1982). 40N. Troullier and J. L. Martins, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991). 41I. V. Abarenkov and V. Heine, Phil. Mag. 12, 529 (1965). 42Z. D. Popovic, J. P. Carbotte, and G. R. Piercy, J. Phys. F4, 351 (1974). 43R. N. Barnett, U. Landman, and C. L. Cleveland, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6534 (1983). 44N. W. Ashcroft, Physics Letters 23, 48 (1966). 45F. Calvayrac, P.-G. Reinhard, and E. Suraud, J. Phys. B 31, 1367 (1998). 46S. K¨ ummel, M. Brack, and P.-G. Reinhard, Phys. Rev. B 58, R1774 (1998). 47W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling und B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN (Cambridge University Press, 1992). 48J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13244 (1992). 49J. Hafner, From Hamiltonians to Phase Diagramms , (Springer, Berlin, 1987). 50J. P. Perdew, H. Q. Tran, and E. D. Smith, Phys. Rev. B 42, 11627 (1990). 51J. P. Perdew, Chem. Phys. Lett. 64, 127 (1979). 52A. Zunger and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 18, 5449 (1978). 53J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1980). 54N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics , (Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, 1976). 55M. S. Anderson and C. A. Swenson, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5395 (1983). 56J. Emsley, The Elements (Clarendon, Oxford, 1991). 57M. L. Cohen and V. Heine, in Solid State Physics , edited by F. Seitz, D. Turnbull and H. Ehrenreich (Academic, New York, 1970), Vol. 24. 58K. K. Verma, J. T. Bahns, A. R. Rajaei-Rizi, W. C. Stwal- ley, and W. T. Zemke, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 3599 (1983). 59H. Haken and H. C. Wolf, Atom- und Quantenphysik , (Springer, Berlin, 1990). 60V. Bonaˇ cic-Kouteck´ y, I. Boustani, M. Guest und J. Kouteck´ y, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4861 (1988). 61S. K¨ ummel, T. Berkus, P.-G. Reinhard and M. Brack, Eur. Phys. J. D 11, 239 (2000). 62M. Brack, Phys. Rev. B 39, 3533 (1989). 63P.-G. Reinhard, O. Genzken, and M. Brack, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 51, 576 (1996). 64S. K¨ ummel and M. Brack, in preparation. 65W. R. Fredrickson and W. W. Watson, Phys. Rev. 30, 429 (1927). 66C. R. C. Wang, S. Pollack, D. Cameron, and M. M. Kappes, Chem. Phys. Lett. 166, 26 (1990); J. Chem. Phys. 93, 3787 (1990). 67G. Lauritsch, P.-G. Reinhard, J. Meyer, and M. Brack, Phys. Lett. A 160, 179 (1991); C. Kohl, B. Montag, and P.-G. Reinhard, Z. Phys. D 35, 57 (1995). 68K. Yabana and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. B 54, 4484 (1996). 69P.-G. Reinhard, J. Babst, B. Fischer, C. Kohl, F. Cal- vayrac, E. Suraud, T. Hirschmann, and M. Brack, Z. Phys. D40, 314 (1997). 70I. Vasiliev, S. ¨O˘ g¨ ut, and J. R. Chelikowsky, Phys. Rev.Lett.82, 1919 (1999). 71T. Reiners, W. Orlik, C. Ellert, M. Schmidt, and H. Haber- land, Chem. Phys. Lett. 215, 357 (1993). 72C. Ellert, M. Schmidt, C. Schmitt, T. Reiners, and H. Haberland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1731 (1995). 73F. Alasia, R. A. Broglia, H. E. Roman, Ll. Serra, G. Colo, and J. M. Pacheco, J. Phys. B 27, L643 (1994). 74S. K¨ ummel, J. Akola, and M. Manninen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3827 (2000). 75P.-G. Reinhard and E. Suraud, in preparation. 76M. Schmidt and H. Haberland, Eur. Phys. J. D 6, 109 (1999). 77B. Montag, Th. Hirschmann, J. Meyer, P.-G. Reinhard, and M. Brack, Phys. Rev. B 52, 4775 (1995). 78P. Meibom, M. Østergard, J. Borggreen, S. Bjørnholm, and H. D. Rasmussen, Z. Phys. D 40, 258 (1997). 79R. Barnett and U. Landmann, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2081 (1993). 80Calculations done by J. Akola, private communication and Ref. 26. 13Cluster ∆ECAPS/eV ∆E3D/eV Na+ 9a G G Na+ 9b 0.10 0.12 Na+ 9c 0.23 G’ Na+ 11a G 0.16 Na+ 11b 0.11 G Na+ 11c 0.19 0.10 Na+ 15a G 0.04 Na+ 15b 0.03 G Na+ 15c 0.15 0.16 Na+ 15d 0.23 0.15 Na+ 17a G G Na+ 17b G’ 0.08 Na+ 17c 0.16 0.20 Na+ 19a G G Na+ 19b 0.23 0.12 Na+ 19c 0.30 0.20 Na+ 19d 0.35 0.12 Na+ 21a G G Na+ 21b G’ 0.03 Na+ 25a G G Na+ 25b 0.41 0.29 Na+ 31a G G Na+ 31b 0.14 0.08 Na+ 31c 0.19 0.10 Na+ 55a G G Na+ 55b 0.41 0.30 Na+ 55d 0.73 0.31 TABLE III. Diﬀerences in total energy for Na+ Nclusters. Small letters behind the cluster symbol label structures an d refer to Fig. 4 – Fig. 13 and the main text. G (and G’) de- note the structure with lowest energy for a given cluster siz e. The left column for each size gives the diﬀerence in total en- ergy between the corresponding structure and G as found in CAPS. The right column gives the energetic diﬀerences found for the same structures in the three-dimensional Kohn-Sham calculation. The 3D values for Na+ 55were obtained by re- laxing the CAPS structures in ab initio Born-Oppenheimer molecular dynamics,80see text for discussion. 14
arXiv:physics/0007019v1 [physics.optics] 8 Jul 2000Symmetries of Optical Phase Conjugation Predrag L. Stojkov∗, Milivoj R. Beli´ c†, and Marko V. Jari´ c‡ ∗UWin! Corporation, GTECH 2006 Nooseneck Hill Road, Coventry RI 02816, USA †Institute of Physics P.O.Box 57, 11001 Belgrade, Yugoslavia ‡Department of Physics, Texas A&M University College Station TX 77843-4242, USA Various algebraic structures of degenerate four-wave mixi ng equations of optical phase conjuga- tion are analyzed. Two approaches (the spinorial and the Lax -pair based), complementary to each other, are utilized for a systematic derivation of conserve d quantities. Symmetry groups of both the equations and the conserved quantities are determined, and the corresponding generators are written down explicitly. Relation between these two symmet ry groups is found. Conserved quanti- ties enable the introduction of new methods for integration of the equations in the cases when the coupling Γ is either purely real or purely imaginary. These m ethods allow for both geometries of the process, namely the transmission and the reﬂection, to be tr eated on an equal basis. One approach to introduction of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian structures f or the 4WM systems is explored, and the obstacles in successful implementation of that programe ar e identiﬁed. In case of real coupling these obstacles are removable, and full Hamiltonian and Lagrangi an formulations of the initial system are possible. I. INTRODUCTION There is a short story prefacing the paper. The work on symmetries in optical phase conjugation started in early nineties by Predrag Stojkov and Milivoj Beli´ c. It was interrupted by Predrag’s leaving for America in 1992. During the stay of M. Beli´ c at the Texas A&M Univer- sity in 1995 and 1996, the problem and an early draft of the paper were brought to Marko’s attention. At the time he was phasing out of quasicrystals, and was open to new ideas. Marko liked the problem and agreed to participate. He read the manuscript, made numerous changes, and suggested a new direction to it. Owing to his commit- ments for the sabbatical at Cornell University in 1995 and the visit to Israel in 1996, it was decided to postpone the serious work after he is back. However, during the Israeli visit Marko was diagnosed with the brain tumor. The paper is left essentially unchanged. It is dedicated to his memory. Steady-state four-wave mixing (4WM) equations de- scribing optical phase conjugation (OPC) in photorefrac- tive (PR) crystals have been solved up to now in a num- ber of ways [1–4]. A common feature of all solution meth- ods is that, ﬁrst, conserved quantities are determined, and then the number of equations is reduced. However, the determination of conserved quantities and the reduc- tion of equations is usually performed in an ad hoc man- ner. Furthermore, the solution of the OPC equations in the two basic geometries of the process, the transmission geometry and the reﬂection geometry, is usually obtained using unrelated methods. Apparent symmetries of wave equations have not been used up to now [5,6] to facilitate the analysis and thesolution of the problem. In this work the symmetries of the equations and the integrals of motion are investi- gated and used to present a uniﬁed method for systematic derivation of conserved quantities, an equal treatment of both geometries, and the reduction in the number of in- dependent variables [7]. Such an analysis allows for not only an easier handling of otherwise cumbersome and un- related relations, but also for a deeper understanding of the physics of the process. Also, rudiments of a formal presentation of the problem along the lines of the theory of dynamical systems are presented. The geometry of the process is simple. Three laser beams intersect within a piece of the PR crystal: two counterpropagating laser pumps A1andA2, and a signal A4. Owing to the PR eﬀect, a fourth wave A3is gener- ated inside the crystal, that counterpropagates to, and is the phase conjugate replica of the signal. There are two main channels along which the generation may proceed. In the ﬁrst one, the signal wave builds a diﬀraction grat- ing with the pump A1. The other pump is diﬀracted oﬀ that grating and transmitted across the crystal into the PC waveA3. This is the so-called transmission geometry (TG) of the process. In the second channel the signal interferes with the pumpA2, and the beam A1is reﬂected oﬀ the grating into the PC wave. This is the reﬂection geometry (RG) of the 4WM process. It is assumed that all waves oscil- late at the same frequency (the degenerate 4WM). Also, a steady-state is assumed, and all beams are approximated by plane waves. The equations of interest are the slowly varying enve- lope wave equations describing 4WM in PR media [1]. In TG, they are of the form IA′ 1= ΓQTA4, 1IA′ 2=¯Γ¯QTA3, IA′ 3=−¯Γ¯QTA2, IA′ 4=−ΓQTA1, (1.1) whereI=/summationtext4 i=1\|Ai\|2is the total intensity, Γ is the coupling constant (complex in general, but often real in PR media), QT=A1¯A4+¯A2A3represents the diﬀrac- tion grating amplitude for TG, the prime denotes spatial derivative along the propagation zdirection, and the bar denotes complex conjugation. In RG, the equations are given by IA′ 1=−ΓQRA3, IA′ 2=−¯Γ¯QRA4, IA′ 3=−¯Γ¯QRA1, IA′ 4=−ΓQRA2, (1.2) where the RG grating amplitude is given by QR= A1¯A3+¯A2A4. In this paper both geometries are treated on an equal footing, using a uniﬁed RG-like notation: B1=A1, B2=A2, B3=A4Πσ+A3Π−σ=/braceleftbigg A4in TG, A3in RG, B4=A3Πσ+A4Π−σ=/braceleftbigg A3in TG, A4in RG,(1.3) whereσis the switching variable, that has value +1 for TG and −1 for RG, and Π ±σ= (1±σ)/2 are the corre- sponding ”projectors.” The ”equations of motion” (EOM) are now IB′ 1=σΓQB3, IB′ 2=σ¯Γ¯QB4, IB′ 3=−¯Γ¯QB1, IB′ 4=−ΓQB2, (1.4) where the intensity is given by I=/summationtext4 i=1\|Bi\|2and the grating amplitude by Q=B1¯B3+¯B2B4. The analysis is organized as follows. Two methods to derive the integrals of motion (IOM) are discussed in Section II. The ﬁrst method is based on the observation that 4WM EOM have a special symmetric form that is allowing an equivalent spinorial formulation. Such a form of EOM leads directly to the derivation of the full set of ”regular” IOM as suitable bi-spinorial combinations. The symmetries of these IOM are the special unitary groups: SU(2) for TG, and SU(1,1) for RG. Initial spinor-like doublets of ﬁelds turn out to transform as the funda- mental irreducible representations of these groups, thus justifying the name ”spinors”. It is indicated how they can be used to reduce the number of dynamical variables. In the second method the Lax pair approach is uti- lized. The diadic products of the 4WM spinors are used as possible choices for the evolving member ( L) of the Lax pair problem. The traces of products of these ma- trices represent IOM. It was established that all higherorder IOM are various combinations of the basic IOM already obtained by the spinorial approach. At the end of Section II two special cases (Γ ∈Rand Γ ∈iR) are considered in some detail. In Section III attention is focused on the derivation of the symmetry groups of EOM, and the corresponding generators. The relation between these symmetries and the symmetries of IOM is discussed. In Section IV the symmetries of IOM are used to write the solutions of EOM (for Γ ∈R) in terms of elementary transcendental functions. Then an alternative solution procedure is explored. In the last part of Section IV the Γ∈iRcase is solved completely. The possibility of introducing the Hamiltonian and La- grangian description of 4WM EOM is explored in Section V. Section VI oﬀers some conclusions and identiﬁes open questions for future research. II. INTEGRALS OF MOTION AND THEIR SYMMETRIES A. Preliminaries In this work the 4WM equations are treated as a dy- namical system deﬁned on the phase space V:≡˜V/ρ≡ R8, with the time variable z. Here ˜Vis the full sixteen- dimensional space ˜V:≡C8≡R16with the complex co- ordinates {xµ} ≡ {Bi,¯Bi}andρis the equivalence rela- tion (analyticity condition) satisﬁed by the 4WM system: xi+4= (xi)∗[i.e.¯Bi= (Bi)∗] fori=1,4. The tangent spaceTV(the space of vector ﬁelds on V), is spanned by thecoordinate basis{∂µ} ≡ {∂i=∂/∂B i;¯∂i=∂/∂¯Bi}. The dynamics on the space Vis given by the trajectory c:Rz→V. It is described by the velocity vector-ﬁeld /vectorF∈TV: /vectorF=µ(σB3∂1−B2∂4) + ¯µ(σB4∂2−B1∂3) +c.c. (2.1) whereµ:≡ΓQ/I. For a general function f(z,x)∈ C1(Rz×V), the corresponding evolution equation is /parenleftbiggdf dz/parenrightbigg = (∂z+/vectorF)f. (2.2) In general, an integral of motion (IOM) q(z,x) is a function that is constant along the trajectory c, i.e. (∂z+/vectorF)q\|c= 0 ( on-shell constancy ). Here the more restrictive deﬁnition of IOM is used: instead of an on-shell constancy, the condition of oﬀ-shell constancy [(∂z+/vectorF)q= 0 in whole V] is used. Also, only the inte- gralsq(x) without the explicit time-dependence are con- sidered, leading to the deﬁning equation /vectorFq= 0. (2.3) 2There is no general procedure for ﬁnding IOM, and one has to take into account various speciﬁcs of the system at hand. For example, one may resort to the brute-force so- lution procedure, which is based on the observation that /vectorFis a linear diﬀerential operator of the zeroth degree of homogeneity (i.e. upon its action on some homogeneous functionPs(x) of degree s, it produces another homoge- neous function of the same degree s). This allows one to replace Eq. (2.3) by the set of inﬁnitely many equations: /vectorFq(s)= 0, (2.4) fors∈N, whereq(s)are the components of qwith the ﬁxed degree of homogeneity s(q=/summationtext∞ s=1q(s)). In gen- eral, Eqs. (2.4) can be solved by a general ansatz (the summation over the repeated indices is assumed): q(1)=αµxµ, q(2)=αµνxµxν, ··· (2.5) which turns Eq. (2.4) into a set of conditions for the ma- tricesα. After some algebra, one ﬁnds that there are no integrals of the ﬁrst degree, and that there are several of the second and higher degrees. B. Spinorial formalism There exists a more elegant way to ﬁnd integrals of motion of the second degree of homogeneity in the 4WM equations [6]. It is based on the fact that convenient pairs of columns (”spinors”) can be formed: \|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbiggB1 B3/parenrightbigg ,\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbiggB4 −σB2/parenrightbigg . (2.6) Now the equations of motion (1.4) can be written as a pair of matrix equations: \|ψj/an}b∇acket∇i}ht′=m\|ψj/an}b∇acket∇i}ht,(j= 1,2) (2.7) where the ”evolution matrix” mis m=/parenleftbigg 0σµ −¯µ0/parenrightbigg , (2.8) andµ= ΓQ/I. The matrix mis traceless and Hermitian (for TG) or skew-Hermitian (for RG), so it belongs to the su(2) algebra for TG, or to the su(1,1) for RG. IOM are found using a simple Lemma: •Lemma 1: A pair of linear matrix equations \|ψA/an}b∇acket∇i}ht′=mA\|ψA/an}b∇acket∇i}ht,\|ψB/an}b∇acket∇i}ht′=mB\|ψB/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (2.9) has an integral of motion /an}b∇acketle{tψA\|n\|ψB/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, if there exists a constant matrix nsuch that nmB+m†An= 0, (2.10)where the dagger denotes the adjoint matrix. In 4WM the IOM are searched for in two possible forms, as /an}b∇acketle{tψi\|n\|ψj/an}b∇acket∇i}htor as/angbracketleftbig¯ψi/vextendsingle/vextendsinglen\|ψj/an}b∇acket∇i}ht. For the ﬁrst form, we have the deﬁning equation (2.10) speciﬁed as nm+m†n= 0, (2.11) whereas for the second form of integrals, the deﬁning equation is nm+mTn= 0. (2.12) For the general (complex) Γ, the unique solutions (up to rescaling by a constant) of these deﬁning equations are the matrices n1=/parenleftbigg 1 0 0σ/parenrightbigg =/braceleftbigg 1for TG, σ3for RG,(2.13) for (2.11) and n2=/parenleftbigg 0−σ σ0/parenrightbigg =−σiσ2=/braceleftbigg −iσ2for TG, iσ2for RG, (2.14) for (2.12), where σjare the Pauli matrices. The corre- sponding integrals are q1=/an}b∇acketle{tψ1\|n1\|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=I1+σI3, q2=/an}b∇acketle{tψ2\|n1\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=I2+σI4, q3=/an}b∇acketle{tψ2\|n1\|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=B1¯B4−B3¯B2, q4=/angbracketleftbig¯ψ1/vextendsingle/vextendsinglen2\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=B1B2+σB3B4. (2.15) Since these IOM are present for arbitrary complex cou- pling Γ, they are said to be the regular IOM of the 4WM system. Later it will be shown that for special choices of Γ this system possesses additional ( exceptional ) IOM. Not all of the conserved quantities q1,q2,q3, ¯q3,q4 and ¯q4are independent. There exists a relation \|q4\|2+σ\|q3\|2=q1q2 (2.16) that reduces the number of (real) integrals of motion to ﬁve. Using the integrals, one can express the conjugated ﬁelds as dependent variables: ¯B1= [σB3¯q3+B2q1]/q4, ¯B2= [B1q2−σB4q3]/q4, ¯B3= [B4q1−B1¯q3]/q4, ¯B4= [B2q3+B3q2]/q4. (2.17) A more natural way to reduce the number of variables using conserved quantities is to introduce polar coordi- nates, suggested by the form of the conserved quantities q1andq2: B1=√q1c(σ,α1)exp(iβ1), B2=√q2c(σ,α2)exp(iβ2), B3=√q1s(σ,α1)exp(iγ1), B4=√q2s(σ,α2)exp(iγ2). (2.18) 3Here the new variables are the six angles: α1,α2,β1,β2, γ1, andγ2. The symbols candsstand for the trigono- metric cosine and sine functions in the TG case, and for the hyperbolic cosine and sine in RG case (see Appendix A). To further ilucidate the connection between IOM and the new variables, it is convenient to employ the integral q, introduced below [Eq. (2.41)]. It can be expressed in terms of the new variables, and the result is q=q2 1+q2 2+ 2q1q2[c(σ,2α1)c(σ,2α2)+ +σs(σ,2α1)s(σ,2α2)cos(Φ)], (2.19) where Φ =β1+β2−γ1−γ2is the so-called relative phase. From the spherical and the hyperbolic [8] trigonometry it is known that the expression in brackets can be un- derstood as a cosine (hyperbolic cosine) of some angle ρ, so that 2α1, 2α2andρare the sides of a spherical (hy- perbolic) triangle, and Φ is its central angle. Therefore c(σ,ρ) =q−q2 1−q2 2 2q1q2=const. (2.20) and Φ only depends on α1andα2: cos(Φ) =c(σ,ρ)−c(σ,2α1)c(σ,2α2) σs(σ,2α1)s(σ,2α2). (2.21) It is easy to check that: \|q4\|2=q1q2c/parenleftig σ,ρ 2/parenrightig2 , \|q3\|2=q1q2s/parenleftig σ,ρ 2/parenrightig2 , (2.22) in agreement with Eq. (2.16). Thus, there are ﬁve in- dependent real conserved quantities: q1,q2,ρ, and the phases ofq3andq4. The solution of EOM using these quantities is performed in Sec. IV. C. Lax Pairs The Lax pair representation (if it exists) helps deter- mination of the integrals of motion. In general, if given dynamical system admits a Lax pair representation dˆL dz= [ˆM,ˆL], (2.23) where ˆLandˆMare suitably chosen operators or matri- ces, then all the traces Tr(ˆLk) (k∈N) are IOM. The determination of such a Lax pair of operators ( ˆM,ˆL) is usually the hardest part of the problem. The brackets in Eq. (2.23) stand for the commutator . In the case of 4WM, the suitable matrices are easy to ﬁnd, starting from the compact form of the spinorial EOM (2.7) and their conjugated equations: ∂z\|ψµ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=m\|ψµ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht,∂z/an}b∇acketle{tψµ\|=−σ/an}b∇acketle{tψµ\|m, (2.24) where the index µ=i,¯iand\|ψ¯i/an}b∇acket∇i}ht:≡n1n2\|¯ψi/an}b∇acket∇i}ht. The fol- lowing matrices Lµν:≡ \|ψµ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht/an}b∇acketle{tψν\|n1, (2.25) satisfy the Lax pair equations ∂zLµν= [m,Lµν]. (2.26) The corresponding Laxian IOM are given by qµ1ν1···µkνk:≡Tr (Lµ1ν1···L µkνk). (2.27) Fork= 1 we have /parenleftbig q(1)µν/parenrightbig = q1q30−q4 ¯q3q2−q40 0−¯q4σq1σ¯q3 −¯q40σq3q2 . (2.28) For higherk, the resulting IOM are the products of q(1). For example, q(2)µναβ=q(1)ανq(1)µβ. Thus, the higher Laxian IOM are not yielding any new independent integrals. An alternative variant of the Lax pair approach is pre- sented in Appendix B. D. I-Symmetry •Deﬁnition 1: The symmetry of the set of integrals {qα}(the I-symmetry ) is the mapping {xµ} → {x′µ} which preserves the analytical structure (x′)i+4= ((x′)i)∗ and leaves all the integrals invariant qα(x′) =qα(x). I-symmetries deﬁne the algebraic structure of the sis- tem at hand. In practice one ﬁrst calculates the inﬁnites- imalI-symmetries, given by δqα(x)≡/vectorlqα≡δxµ∂µqα= 0, (2.29) where/vectorl=ωµ(x)∂µis the generating vector ﬁeld, and then establishes the large(non-inﬁnitesimal) I-symmetries, by exponentiating the inﬁnitesimal ones. This is the stan- dard procedure in the theory of Lie-groups. Although in general the coeﬃcients ωµare nonlinear functions of {x}(the nonlinear I-symmetries), here only the linear I-symmetry algebras will be considered. These can be calculated easily by a linear ansatz ωµ=aµνxν. In this way a general linear symmetry of the full set {q1,···,¯q4}of the regular IOM is found: 2δB1= +iǫ3B1+ (ǫ2+iǫ1)B3, 2δB2=−iǫ3B2+ (ǫ2−iǫ1)B4, 2δB3=−iǫ3B3−σ(ǫ2−iǫ1)B1, 2δB4= +iǫ3B4−σ(ǫ2+iǫ1)B2. (2.30) In the spinor notation the matrix form of I-symmetries is 4δ\|ψ1,2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=ΣT\|ψ1,2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (2.31) where the traceless matrix Σis given by Σ=1 2/parenleftbigg iǫ3−σ(ǫ2−iǫ1) ǫ2+iǫ1 −iǫ3/parenrightbigg =iǫaSa,(2.32) and{ǫa}are real parameters. The basis matrices (the generators ) are S1=1 2/parenleftbigg 0σ 1 0/parenrightbigg =/braceleftbigg1 2σ1for TG, −i 2σ2for RG, S2=1 2/parenleftbigg 0σi −i0/parenrightbigg =/braceleftbigg−1 2σ2for TG, −i 2σ1for RG, S3=1 2σ3. (2.33) The set of all matrices Σthat are traceless and satisfy the generalized hermiticity condition Σ†η+ηΣ= 0 forms the Lie-algebra su(2) for TG, and su(1,1) for RG. The matrixη=n1is called the su(2)/su(1,1)metric matrix. The generators {Sa}obey the standard commutation re- lations [S1,S2] =−iσS3, [S2,S3] =−iS1, [S3,S1] =−iS2. (2.34) Thus, both \|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}htand\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}htare transforming according to thefundamental (spinorial) representation of the corre- sponding algebra gI. Every ﬁnite Lie-algebra ghas the corresponding Lie- group Gof ”large” transformations, obtained via expo- nential mapping: ∀Σ∈g⇒G:≡exp(iΣ)∈ G. ForgI=su(2) (the TG case), the group is GI=SU(2), and for gI=su(1,1) (the RG case), the group is SU(1,1), the noncompact version of SU(2). Both groups can be represented by sets of 2 ×2 complex matrices G that are unimodular (det G= 1) and (pseudo)unitary (G†ηG=η). The Cayley-Klein parameterization of the general SU(2)/SU(1,1) group element G=/parenleftbigg y1+iy2y3+iy4 −σ(y3−iy4)y1−iy2/parenrightbigg , (2.35) wherey1,···,4∈R, turns the unimodality condition into a geometric relation (the deﬁnition of the parameter man- ifold of the group GI): detG= (y1)2+ (y2)2+σ/bracketleftbig (y3)2+ (y4)2/bracketrightbig = 1. (2.36) Thus, the parameter manifold forSU(2)Iis the sphere S3, and forSU(1,1)Iit is the hyperboloid H3, both em- bedded in R4. (For a short classiﬁcation of hyperboloids inR4see Appendix C.)From this fact alone, one could expect that the TG case will be expressed in a natural way in terms of the trigono- metric functions, and the RG case in terms of both the trigonometric functions (compact dimensions) and the hyperbolic functions (noncompact dimensions). In this sense the cases are ”twins”, i.e. there is a number of equations holding in both cases, up to the exchange of the trigonometric/hyperbolic functions. E. Action of I-Symmetries on the Lax variables It is of interest to know the action of the I-symmetries on the Lax matrices Lµν. Since the Lax matrices are con- structed out of the basic spinors, some regularity must be induced in the transformation law of these variables. For example, for L11=\|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht/an}b∇acketle{tψ1\|n1, the action of the inﬁnitesimal I-symmetry yields δL11=ΣTL11+L11n−1 1Σ∗n1. Owing to matrix identities n−1 1=n1andn1Σ∗n1= −ΣT, this expression simpliﬁes to δL11=/bracketleftbig ΣT,L11/bracketrightbig . (2.37) This represents the adjoint action of the I-symmetry on L11. In a similar way, one ﬁnds that the same transfor- mation law is valid for all Lµν: δLµν=/bracketleftbig ΣT,Lµν/bracketrightbig . (2.38) Thus, due to cyclic invariance of the matrix trace oper- ation, all Laxian IOM are invariant upon the action of I-symmetries. This is expected. F. Exceptional IOM The ”regular” IOM, obtained in the subsection II B, form the full set of IOM for the complex coupling Γ. How- ever, in the special cases when Γ is either real or imagi- nary, there exist additional IOM. These will be called the ”exceptional” IOM. To see the signiﬁcance of these special cases, let us evaluate the ”time”-change of the grating amplitude Q: IQ′=−ΓQq5. (2.39) Hereq5is the expression q5=I1+I2−σ(I3+I4), whose ”time”-change is Iq′ 5= 4σRe (Γ) \|Q\|2. (2.40) Notice that q5is IOM in the case of imaginary Γ (so, it is an ”exceptional” IOM). However, when Γ is a complex number, this quantity turns out to be a suitable variable for later calculations. From equations (2.39) and (2.40) another conserved quantity (for the general, complex Γ) is obtained: 5q=q2 5+ 4σ\|Q\|2. (2.41) This quantity is IOM of the fourth order. It does not carry any independent information, since it is reducible to the already known regular IOM: q= (q1+q2)2−4σ\|q3\|2. (2.42) Nevertheless, q5plays an important role in one of the two presented procedures for solving EOM in the Γ ∈Rcase. From Eq. (2.39), two important relations follow: I\|Q\|′=−Re (Γ) \|Q\|q5, Iarg(Q)′=−Im (Γ)q5. (2.43) These equations indicate the existence of two important special cases: Γ ∈Rand Γ ∈iR. The case Im Γ = 0 implies arg Q=const, so thatφ:≡argµ=const, while the case Re Γ = 0 implies that \|Q\|=const. The Γ ∈R case is considered ﬁrst. 1.Γ∈R Analysis of this case is based on the fact that the phase φof the grating amplitude Qis constant for real cou- plings. This allows introduction of a new independent variableθ(z) =/integraltextz 0dz′\|µ(z′)\|+θ0, which casts the prob- lem into a linear form. The matrix mis now replaced by ˜m=/parenleftbigg 0σν −¯ν0/parenrightbigg , (2.44) whereν:≡exp(iφ) =const. The deﬁning relation (2.11) has as solutions not only the matrix n1, but also the new one: n3≡/parenleftbigg 0ν −¯ν0/parenrightbigg , (2.45) which is anti-Hermitian n† 3=−n3. Along the same lines, the deﬁning relation (2.12) has as solutions both the ma- trixn2and the new one: n4≡/parenleftbigg ¯ν0 0σν/parenrightbigg , (2.46) which is symmetric. Having the new matrices n3and n4that satisfy the Lemma, a set of additional conserved quantities can be constructed: w1:≡ /an}b∇acketle{tψ1\|n3\|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht= 2iIm (ν¯B1B3) w2:≡ /an}b∇acketle{tψ2\|n3\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=−2iσIm (ν¯B4B2), w3:≡ /an}b∇acketle{tψ1\|n3\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=−σν¯B1B2−¯ν¯B3B4 w4:≡/angbracketleftbig¯ψ1/vextendsingle/vextendsinglen4\|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht= ¯νB2 1+σνB2 3, w5:≡/angbracketleftbig¯ψ1/vextendsingle/vextendsinglen4\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht= ¯νB1B4−νB3B2, w6:≡/angbracketleftbig¯ψ2/vextendsingle/vextendsinglen4\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht= ¯νB2 4+σνB2 2. (2.47) Note that /an}b∇acketle{tψ2\|n3\|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=−w3and/angbracketleftbig¯ψ2/vextendsingle/vextendsinglen4\|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=w5.One can extend the Lax procedure, in the spirit of the subsection II C, to this case as well. The Lax matrices are now L(R) µν:≡ \|ψµ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht/an}b∇acketle{tψν\|n3, and the corresponding Lax equations ∂θL(R) µν= [˜m,L(R) µν]. (2.48) The corresponding Laxian IOM of the ﬁrst order are TrL(R) µν= w1−¯w3w4w5 w3w2w5w6 −¯w4−¯w5−σw1−σw3 −¯w5−¯w6σ¯w3−σw2 .(2.49) These IOM are the same as the ones already obtained through the spinorial approach. As mentioned, a more general Lax pair procedure is presented in Appendix B. Action of an I-symmetry on L(R) µνproduces δL(R) µν=ΣTL(R) µν+L(R) µνn−1 3ΣT†n3. Here the condition n−1 3ΣT†n3=−ΣT, necessary for the covariant form of action, can be achieved in diﬀerent ways: •Case 1:ν2=−σ. This corresponds to φ=±π/2 (in TG) and to φ= 0 orπ(in RG). This case allows for the fullsuIsymmetry, i.e. all three ǫaparameters can have non-zero values. However, only the diagonal part of ΣT ﬁgures in the transformation law: δL(R) µν=iǫ3 2[σ3,L(R) µν]. (2.50) •Case 2:ν2/ne}ationslash=−σ. Here only the diagonal part of I-symmetries survives, i.e. ǫ1andǫ2have to be set equal to zero. The transformation law still has the same form as in the case above. Thus, thewIOM are invariant under the full suIsym- metry algebra if ν2=−σ, and under the u1subalgebra generated by σ3/2 ifν2/ne}ationslash=−σ. An important special case is the phase conjugation, when the relative phase Φ ( ≡β1+β2−γ1−γ2) is constant (0 or π). Then, using relations (2.18) and the fact that the argument φ(=β1−γ1=γ2−β2) ofµ is constant, the following values for the integrals ware obtained: w1= 0, w2= 0, w3=−√q1q2c(σ,α1−α2)exp(i(β2−γ1)), w4=q1exp(i(β1+γ1)), w5=σq2exp(i(β2+γ2)), w6=−√q1q2s(σ,α1−α2)exp(i(β1+β2)). (2.51) These relations imply that all the phases β1,β2,γ1,γ2 are constant, and that the α-variables are linearly depen- dent:α1−α2= constant. Hence, all the ﬁelds essentially depend on only one real quantity, for example on α1. 62.Γ∈iR The case of Γ imaginary has only one exceptional in- tegral,q5. The corresponding I-symmetry of the set {q1,...,q 5}is restricted to the diagonal part of Eq. (2.30): 2δB1=iǫ3B1, 2δB2=−iǫ3B2, 2δB3=−iǫ3B3, 2δB4=iǫ3B4. (2.52) This is au(1) algebra of the transformations: δ\|ψ1,2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=iǫ3 2σ3\|ψ1,2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (2.53) and the corresponding group is U(1). The parameter space of this group is the circle S1of circumference 4 π. That group is the subgroup of both SU(2)IandSU(1,1)I groups. III. SYMMETRIES OF THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION In general, one should distinguish the symmetries of the integrals of motion from the symmetries of the equa- tions of motion. •Deﬁnition 2:E-symmetries [9]: Any vector-ﬁeld /vectorLthat satisﬁes the master equation /bracketleftig /vectorL,/vectorF/bracketrightig = 0, (3.1) is the symmetry of the dynamical equations (1.4). The set gEof E-symmetries is also a Lie-algebra, i.e. it is linear, and the commutator of any two E-symmetries is another E-symmetry. So, one can describe the full al- gebra by its generators and their commutation relations. The E-symmetries are sought in the form of the most general linear ansatz /vectorL=xµaµν∂ν. (3.2) After some algebra, six generators are found for the 4WM system: /vectorL0=B1∂1+B2∂2+B3∂3+B4∂4+c.c., /vectorL1=i(B1∂1+B2∂2+B3∂3+B4∂4−c.c.), /vectorL2=i(B1∂1−B2∂2−c.c.), /vectorL3=i(B3∂3−B4∂4−c.c.), /vectorL4=¯B2∂1−¯B1∂2+¯B4∂3−¯B3∂4+c.c., /vectorL5=i(¯B2∂1−¯B1∂2+¯B4∂3−¯B3∂4−c.c.).(3.3) These six generators form the complete set of linear E- symmetries for the general (complex) Γ. They generatethe algebra gE≡r⊕u(1)⊕u(1)⊕su(1,1), with the non-vanishing commutators [/vectorL1,/vectorL4] =−2/vectorL5, [/vectorL1,/vectorL5] = 2/vectorL4, [/vectorL4,/vectorL5] = 2/vectorL1. (3.4) Deﬁning the general inﬁnitesimal E-symmetry by δ≡/summationtext5 i=0θi/vectorLi, we ﬁnd the transformation law of the ﬁelds: δB1= [θ0+i(θ1+θ2)]B1+ (θ4+iθ5)¯B2, δB2= [θ0+i(θ1−θ2)]B2−(θ4+iθ5)¯B1, δB3= [θ0+i(θ1+θ3)]B3+ (θ4+iθ5)¯B4, δB4= [θ0+i(θ1−θ3)]B4−(θ4+iθ5)¯B3,(3.5) or, in a more compact notation: δ\|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/bracketleftbigg (θ0+iθ1)1+i/parenleftbigg θ20 0θ3/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg \|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht+ −(θ4+iθ5)\|ψ¯2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, δ\|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/bracketleftbigg (θ0+iθ1)1−i/parenleftbigg θ20 0θ3/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg \|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht+ −σ(θ4+iθ5)\|ψ¯1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht. (3.6) The parameters θ0andθ4correspond to the two noncom- pact dimensions of the symmetry group GE, i.e. their val- ues are arbitrary real numbers. This is in contrast to the rest of the parameters, which are periodic. So, the group of E-symmetries GE≡expgEisR⊗U(1)2⊗SU(1,1). It is easy to check [from the deﬁning relation (3.1)] that the E-symmetries always map the integrals of motion to the integrals of motion (and also the solutions of EOM to the solutions of EOM). Hence: δq1= 2θ0q1+ (θ4+iθ5)¯q4+ (θ4−iθ5)q4, δq2= 2θ0q2−(θ4+iθ5)¯q4−(θ4−iθ5)q4, δq3= [2θ0+i(θ2+θ3)]q3, δq4= 2(θ0+iθ1)q4+ (θ4+iθ5)(q2−q1).(3.7) This is a version of the N¨ other theorem: If one of IOM is taken as the ”Hamiltonian” Hof the system, then the action/vectorLi(H) of each/vectorLion such a Hamiltonian produces another IOM. Here, the following linear combinations of regular IOM are forming the irreducible representations of the u(1)L0⊕su(1,1)L1,L4,L5algebra under the E-symmetries: q1+q2,q3and ¯q3form singlets δ(q1+q2) = 2θ0(q1+q2), δq3= [2θ0+i(θ2+θ3)]q3, δ¯q3= [2θ0−i(θ2+θ3)]¯q3, (3.8) while \|T/an}b∇acket∇i}ht:≡/braceleftbig q4,(q1−q2)/√ 2,¯q4/bracerightbigTis transforming as the triplet representation δ\|T/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=P\|T/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, where Pis given by  2(θ0+iθ1)−√ 2(θ4+iθ5) 0√ 2(θ4−iθ5) 2θ0√ 2(θ4+iθ5) 0 −√ 2(θ4−iθ5) 2(θ0−iθ1) . Hence, one can start from the knowledge of only q1 and recover the (almost) full set of regular integrals {q1,q2,q4,¯q4}, by acting on them with the E-symmetries. 7A.Γ∈R In the Γ ∈Rcase, one can apply the same linear ansatz as in the general case. The set of linear E-symmetries thus obtained is {/vectorL0,···,/vectorL7}, where/vectorL0−5are the already known generators (3.3), and the two additional genera- tors are found for the RG case: /vectorL6=B4∂1−B3∂2+B2∂3−B1∂4+c.c., /vectorL7=i(¯B4∂1+¯B3∂2+¯B2∂3+¯B1∂4−c.c.). (3.9) An alternative approach is to perform the redeﬁnition z→θ(z) of the ”time” variable (introduced in the previ- ous section), making the matrix ˜m=/parenleftbigg 0σν −¯ν0/parenrightbigg con- stant. This allows one to translate the vector-ﬁeld lan- guage (applicable in the general case) into the matrix language. Deﬁne the column \|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht ≡ \|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht \|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht \|ψ¯1/an}b∇acket∇i}ht \|ψ¯2/an}b∇acket∇i}ht . (3.10) The evolution equation (2.7) can now be written as ∂θ\|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=M\|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (3.11) where the constant evolution matrix is M:≡14⊗˜m= ˜m0 0 0 0˜m0 0 0 0 ˜m0 0 0 0 ˜m . (3.12) The master equation (3.1) now has the matrix form [K,M] = 0, (3.13) where the matrix K= (Kµν) deﬁnes the inﬁnitesi- mal symmetry of the big ”spinor” δ\|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=K\|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht(here µ,ν∈ {1,2,¯1,¯2}). The above master equation is trans- lated into ”smaller” versions [ Kµν,˜m] = 0, valid for each 2×2 block matrix Kµν. Solutions of these ”small” master equations are all of the same form Kµν=αµν12+βµν˜m,(∀µ,ν). (3.14) The analiticity conditions \|ψ¯i/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=n1n2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle¯ψi/angbracketrightbig yield the constraints α¯ij=−σαi¯j, β¯ij=−σβi¯j, α¯i¯j=αij, β¯i¯j=βij, (3.15) i.e. K¯ij=−σαi¯j12−σβi¯j˜m, K¯i¯j=α¯i¯j12+β¯i¯j˜m. (3.16) Hence:δ\|ψi/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=αij\|ψj/an}b∇acket∇i}ht+βij˜m\|ψj/an}b∇acket∇i}ht+ +αi¯j/vextendsingle/vextendsingleψ¯j/angbracketrightbig +βi¯j˜m/vextendsingle/vextendsingleψ¯j/angbracketrightbig , δ\|ψ¯i/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=−σαi¯j\|ψj/an}b∇acket∇i}ht −σβi¯j˜m\|ψj/an}b∇acket∇i}ht+ +αij/vextendsingle/vextendsingleψ¯j/angbracketrightbig +βij˜m/vextendsingle/vextendsingleψ¯j/angbracketrightbig . (3.17) In this way the rescaled EOM have 32 symmetries, char- acterized by the the real and the imaginary parts of the parameters {αij,βij,αi¯j,βi¯j}(i,j= 1,2). B. On the relation between I-symmetries and E-symmetries One may ask the question, what is the relation be- tween the two groups of symmetries: I-symmetries and E-symmetries? The following general consideration clar- iﬁes this issue a bit. Let /vectorFbe the EOM vector ﬁeld, δan arbitrary E-symmetry, δan arbitrary I-symmetry, andqan arbitrary IOM. Since [ /vectorF,δ]≡0 and/vectorF(q)≡0, it follows that /vectorF(δq) = 0, i.e. δq∼q(N¨ other theo- rem: E-symmetry of IOM is also IOM). From this con- clusion and from δq≡0 it follows that [ δ,δ]q= 0, i.e. [δ,δ]∼δ(E-symmetry maps an I-symmetry into another I-symmetry). Hence, one expects that [ /vectorLi,/vectorSa]∼/vectorSb. This can be explicitly checked in the case of 4WM sys- tem: the generators /vectorLifori∈ {0,1,4,5}commute with all three/vectorSagenerators, whereas the remaining two E- symmetries /vectorL2,3have nontrivial commutators with /vectorSa: [/vectorL2,/vectorS1±/vectorS2] =∓i/parenleftig /vectorS1±/vectorS2/parenrightig , [/vectorL3,/vectorS1±/vectorS2] =±i/parenleftig /vectorS1±/vectorS2/parenrightig , [/vectorL2,3,/vectorS3] = 0. (3.18) Thus thesu(1,1)Esymmetry (generated by {/vectorL1,/vectorL4,/vectorL5}) commutes with the su(2)I/su(1,1)Isymmetry. IV. SOLUTION PROCEDURES A.Γ∈R: The ﬁrst procedure We present in detail the solution procedures for the case when Γ is real. This case is physically the most rele- vant. The case when Γ is imaginary, is treated similarly. The equations for α1andα2, extracted from Eqs. (1.4), form a closed system of equations: 2Iα′ 1=−Γ [q1s(σ,2α1) +q2s(σ,2α2)cos(Φ)], 2Iα′ 2=−Γ [q1s(σ,2α1)cos(Φ) +q2s(σ,2α2)], (4.1) which can be integrated with little diﬃculty. Once α1 andα2are known, the remaining four angles are found easily: 2Iβ′ 1=−σΓq2sin(Φ)s(σ,2α2)t(σ,α1), 82Iβ′ 2=−σΓq1sin(Φ)s(σ,2α1)t(σ,α2), 2Iγ′ 1=−Γq2sin(Φ)s(σ,2α2)ct(σ,α1), 2Iγ′ 2=−Γq1sin(Φ)s(σ,2α1)ct(σ,α2), (4.2) wheretandctare the remaining two trigonomet- ric/hyperbolic functions, formed by using the rule (A4) (see Appendix A). Equations (4.1) are integrated as follows. First, two new variables are introduced: x1=c(σ,2α1), x2=c(σ,2α2). (4.3) In terms of these variables q5=q1x1+q2x2, and Eqs. (4.1) become Ix′ 1= Γ [q1+q2c(σ,ρ)−x1q5], Ix′ 2= Γ [q2+q1c(σ,ρ)−x2q5]. (4.4) Note that, due to symmetry, only one of Eqs. (4.4) is independent. The solution of the other is obtained from the solution of the ﬁrst one by interchanging q1andq2. This, however, holds only when Γ is real. On the other hand, using Eq. (2.41), Eq. (2.40) can be written as: Iq′ 5= Γ/parenleftbig q−q2 5/parenrightbig . (4.5) The integration of this equation depends on the geome- try. For TG, the total intensity is constant ( I=q1+q2), so that /integraldisplaydq5 q−q2 5=Γz I. (4.6) For RG, the intensity is not constant, and /integraldisplayq5dq5 q−q2 5= Γz. (4.7) The value of the integral in TG depends on whether qis larger or smaller than q2 5. For the ﬁrst case: q5(z) =√qtanh/bracketleftbigg tanh−1/parenleftbiggq5(0)√q/parenrightbigg +√q IΓz/bracketrightbigg (4.8) whereas for the second: q5(z) =√qcotanh/bracketleftbigg cotanh−1/parenleftbiggq5(0)√q/parenrightbigg +√q IΓz/bracketrightbigg . (4.9) In RG: q2 5(z) =q2 5(0)exp( −2Γz) +q[1−exp(−2Γz)]. (4.10) Onceq5is determined, Eqs. (4.4) for x1andx2(i.e.α1 andα2) can be integrated. The problem, therefore, can be reduced to the determination of one variable. Other variables can be solved in quadratures. To complete the solution, it remains to ﬁt boundary conditions. This problem, however, is more conveniently addressed by an alternative solution procedure.B.Γ∈R: The second procedure Another convenient method for solution of 4WM equa- tions is based on the linearization procedure (the replace- ment of the ”time” variable zby the variable θ(z) =/integraltextz 0\|µ(z′)\|dz′+θ0). Then (2.7) remains the same, but the matrix m→˜mbecomes constant [ µ→ν= exp(iφ)]. The explicit solution of Eqs.(2.7) is now \|ψj(θ)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbigg c(σ,Θ)σνs(σ,Θ) −¯νs(σ,Θ)c(σ,Θ)/parenrightbigg \|ψj(θ0)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (4.11) where Θ = θ−θ0andθ0is to be determined from the boundary conditions. The subscript 0 stands for the quantities evaluated at z= 0. The matrix in Eq. (4.11) explicitly displays the SUnature of the symmetry of so- lutions, and allows for an easy identiﬁcation of Euler an- gles for the problem: α=φ,β= 2θ,γ=−φ. In this formulation (real Γ) only one independent variable ( θ) is found necessary. The angle φis ﬁxed by the boundary conditions. The evaluation of θ0is facilitated by writing \|Q\|and q5in terms of θ: \|Q\|=√qs(σ,2θ)/2, q5=−σ√qc(σ,2θ).(4.12) The form of the solution is diﬀerent in the two geome- tries, since Iis constant in TG, whereas it is not in RG. At this point the symmetry in treating the two geome- tries is broken. The solution of Eq. (4.5) is tan(θ) = tan(θ0)exp (√qΓz/I), (4.13) in TG, and sinh(2θ) = sinh(2θ0)exp(Γz), (4.14) in RG. The procedure for evaluation of θ0is also diﬀerent in the two geometries. We ﬁrst present the TG case. The angleθ0is found when boundary conditions are applied to the solution given by Eq. (4.13). The condi- tions are that the ﬁelds are given at the opposite faces of the crystal: Aj(z= 0 orz=d) =Cj. In OPCC3= 0. Using these conditions, a number of auxiliary quantities is deﬁned: u=\|C4\|2− \|C1\|2+\|C2\|2, v=\|C4\|2− \|C1\|2− \|C2\|2, p= 2C1¯C4exp(−iφ), α= exp ( −√qΓd/I), (4.15) (all real), and a shorthand notation is introduced: x= tan(θd−θ0), y= tan(θd+θ0). (4.16) There exists a rational relation connecting xandy: y=ux+p v−px, x=vy−p u+py. (4.17) 9It is seen that xandydepend on θ0and [through Eq. (4.13)] onq. However, there also exists a relation ex- pressingx(and likewise y) only through q: x=−c q−a±/bracketleftigg/parenleftbiggc q−a/parenrightbigg2 −q−b q−a/bracketrightigg1/2 ,(4.18) wherea=p2+u2,b=p2+v2,c=p(u−v) = 2p\|C2\|2. This relation is used to write an implicit equation for q: α=ξ2−η2, (4.19) whereξ= (1−α)/2x,η= (1 +α)/2y. Thus, given the boundary conditions, Eq. (4.19) is to be solved numeri- cally, to determine q. Givenq,xandyare found, and θ0 evaluated from the relation tan(θ0) =α ξ+η. (4.20) This completes the TG procedure. For RG, one ﬁnds two expressions for the modulus of the grating \|Q\|atz= 0: \|Q0\|= tanh(Θ d)\|C\|2/(e−1) = =\|p\|sech/parenleftbig \|C1\|2+\|C4\|2/parenrightbig , (4.21) where \|C\|2=/summationtext\|Ci\|2,e= exp(Γd), and now \|p\|= \|¯C2C4\|. This yields an expression for sinh(Θ d): sinh(Θ d) =\|p\|(e−1) e(\|C1\|2+\|C4\|2) +\|C2\|2. (4.22) Using Eqs. (4.21) and (4.22), an expression for tanh(2 θ0) is obtained: tanh(2θ0) =sinh(2Θ d) e−cosh(2Θ d). (4.23) This completes the RG procedure. C.Γ∈iR It is useful to note that beside the equations (2.39) and (2.43), one can derive an equation for the intensity II′= 2(σ−1)Re (Γ) \|Q\|2. (4.24) From these equations it follows that in the Γ imaginary case a number of additional quantities is constant: \|Q\|, q5,I. The equation for the phase can be recast as I∂zarg(Q) =−˜Γq5, (4.25) where Γ ≡:i˜Γ, and solved: arg(Q(z)) = arg(Q(0))−˜Γq5 Iz. (4.26) Since \|µ(z)\|=\|ΓQ(z)\|/I(z) =\|˜Γ\|\|Q\|/Iis constant, one obtains an explicit expressionµ(z) =\|µ0\|exp(iφ0−iΩz), (4.27) where \|µ0\|:≡ \|˜Γ\|\|Q\|/I,φ0:≡π/2 + arg ˜Γ + arg(Q(0)) and Ω : ≡˜Γq5/I. Now the evolution matrix m(z) from the spinor EOM (2.7) has the form m(z) =/parenleftbigg 0σ\|µ0\|eiφ0−iΩz −\|µ0\|e−iφ0+iΩz0/parenrightbigg ,(4.28) and the formal solutions of EOM (2.7) are \|ψi(z)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=U(z)\|ψi(0)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht. (4.29) TheU(z) matrix is the ordered exponential (see Ap- pendix D for a discussion) of m(z): U(z) =/parenleftbigg exp/parenleftbigg/integraldisplayz 0dz′m(z′)/parenrightbigg/parenrightbigg +(4.30) where the plussubscript indicates the path-ordered na- ture of the exponential. In practice, to obtain the explicit form of U(z) in terms of non-ordered quantities, one has to solve the initial value problem (IVP) ∂zU(z) =m(z)U(z), U(0) = 1. (4.31) For the speciﬁc m(z) the explicit solution to this IVP is found (see Appendix E): U11= exp/parenleftbigg −iΩz 2/parenrightbigg /bracketleftbigg cos/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg +iΩ Ξsin/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg , U12=i2σQ√qexp/parenleftbigg −iΩz 2/parenrightbigg sin/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg , U21=−i2σ¯Q√qexp/parenleftbigg iΩz 2/parenrightbigg sin/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg , U22= exp/parenleftbigg iΩz 2/parenrightbigg /bracketleftbigg cos/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg −iΩ Ξsin/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg , (4.32) where Ξ : ≡˜Γ√q/Iandq:≡q2 5+ 4σ\|Q\|2. It is easy to check that det U(z) = 1. In this manner, for known initial values \|ψi(0)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, the full solution at later ”times” z >0 is given by Eq. (4.29). However, by the nature of the 4WM system, one knows only the part of initial conditions. The system represents a split boundary value problem. •For the TG case the beams B1=A1andB3=A4 are entering the crystal sample from the z= 0 side, while other two beams B2=A2andB4=A3are coming from thez=dside. Thus, only \|ψ1/an}b∇acket∇i}htis determined at z= 0, while \|ψ2/an}b∇acket∇i}hthas a ﬁxed value at z=dboundary: \|ψ1(0)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbigg C1 C3/parenrightbigg ,\|ψ2(d)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbigg C4 −σC2/parenrightbigg .(4.33) In this way: \|ψ1(z)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=U(z)\|ψ1(0)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, \|ψ2(z)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=U(z)U(d)†\|ψ2(d)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht. (4.34) 10•For the RG case only B1=A1andB4=A4are known at the z= 0 boundary: B1(0) =C1,B4(0) =C4, while the remaining two ﬁeld variables are given at the z=dboundary: B2(d) =C2,B3(d) =C3. This means that both spinors \|ψi/an}b∇acket∇i}ht(i= 1,2) are satisfying the mixed boundary conditions, where one component satisﬁes the initial value condition (at z= 0) and the other compo- nent satisﬁes the ﬁnal boundary condition (at z=d): \|ψ1(0)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbigg C1 B3(0)/parenrightbigg ,\|ψ1(d)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbigg B1(d) C3/parenrightbigg , \|ψ2(0)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbigg C4 −σB2(0)/parenrightbigg ,\|ψ2(d)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=/parenleftbigg B4(d) −σC2/parenrightbigg , (4.35) whereB3(0),B1(d),B2(0) andB4(d) are unknown. In order to determine them, one has to use the evolution formula Eq. (4.29) to express the unknown boundary values in terms of the known ones. After some simple algebra one obtains B1(d) =C1+U12(d)C3 U22(d), B3(0) =C3−U21(d)C1 U22(d), B4(d) =C4−σU12(d)C2 U22(d), B2(0) =C2+σU21(d)C4 U22(d). (4.36) Here the unimodality condition det U(z) = 1 ( ∀z) was used. This concludes the solution procedure for both ge- ometries. V. THE (PSEUDO)HAMILTONIAN STRUCTURE OF 4WM Considering again the form of the spinorial EOM (2.7), one may notice that (in the TG with µ∈Rcase) the ma- trixmis antisymmetric, resembling the symplectic ma- trix used in the Hamiltonian formalism for mechanical systems. This notice gives rise to the question whether it is posible to reformulate the 4WM system as a Hamil- tonian system. In this section one possible approach to the problem is considered. First the neccessary general deﬁnitions are given, and then the speciﬁcs of the 4WM system are discussed. A. Preliminaries For the formulation of the Hamiltonian formalism [10] one needs a phase space in the form of a smooth mani- foldVand a closed nondegenerate diﬀerential 2-form ˆF (theﬁeld-strength form) deﬁned on it, which endows asymplectic structure on V. In the phase space with the canonical coordinates {q1,...qD,p1,...p D}(qinot to be confused with the conserved quantities), the canonical form of ˆFis ˆF=D/summationdisplay k=1dqk∧dpk. (5.1) The 2-form ˆFsets up an isomorphism between the tan- gent spaceTVand the cotangent space∗TV. Denote the inverse mapping by ˆJ:∗TV→TV. In the canonical co- ordinates ˆJhas the form ˆJ=D/summationdisplay k=1∂qk∧∂pk. (5.2) In a general system of coordinates {xµ\|µ=1,2D}, the forms of ˆFandˆJbecome ˆF=1 2Fµνdxµ∧dxν, ˆJ=1 2Jµν∂µ∧∂ν, (5.3) with mutually inverse skew-symmetric matrices F= (Fµν) andJ= (Jµν). Here the summation over the re- peated greek indices is assumed. The matrix Jis known as the symplectic matrix. Physical quantities are smooth functions on V, form- ing the space C∞(V). A Poisson bracket is deﬁned in C∞(V), generating a Lie-algebra structure {f,g}PB=Jµν∂µf∂νg. (5.4) In the canonical coordinates this means {f,g}PB=D/summationdisplay k=1(∂qkf∂pkg−∂qkg∂pkf). (5.5) The Poisson bracket is bilinear, skew-symmetric, and obeys the Jacobi identity, which is equivalent to the close- ness of the 2-form ˆF:dˆF= 0. Later more will be elabo- rated on this condition. The dynamics is determined by the choice of the Hamilton function HonV. The external diﬀerential dH is a covector ﬁeld (1-form), and ˆJ·dHis the correspond- ing Hamilton’s vector ﬁeld on V. The Hamilton equation of motion is speciﬁed by equating the tangent vector ﬁeld ˙/vector x:≡˙xµ∂µwith the Hamilton’s vector ﬁeld: ˙/vector x=ˆJ·dH. (5.6) The Poisson bracket {f,g}PBmay now be represented by the action of the covector dfon Hamilton’s vector ﬁeldˆJ·dg:{f,g}PB=df(ˆJ·dg). Therefore, the deriva- tive of function fin the direction of Hamilton’s vector ﬁeld ˆJ·dHis in fact {F,H}PB. Hence, the Hamil- ton equation (5.6) can be written as ˙f={f,H}PBfor an arbitrary function f. Since the coordinate functions 11{q1,...qD,p1,...p D}form a complete basis, the equations ˙qk={qk,H}PB=∂pkH, ˙pk={pk,H}PB=−∂qkH, (5.7) form a closed system. These are the canonical Hamilton equations of motion. B. Four-wave mixing In an attempt to cast the 4WM system in the Hamil- tonian form, one encounters several problems. First, there is no clear choice of the Hamiltonian (Hamilton’s function) H(x). It can be an arbitrary real function of the full set of conserved quantities: H(x) = h(q(x)). For example, for the general Γ ∈C, one can identify three convenient families of Hamiltonians HQ1,ǫ=q1+ǫq2, HQ3λ=λq3+¯λ¯q3, HQ4λ=λq4+¯λ¯q4, (5.8) whereǫ=±1 and \|λ\|= 1. Clearly, these families are not exhausting all the possible choices, even among the Hamiltonians that are linear in the regular IOM. The corresponding symplectic matrices are Jq1ǫ= µ ǫ¯µ −¯µ −ǫµ ¯µ ǫµ −µ −ǫ¯µ , (5.9) Jq3λ= −σ¯λµ σλ¯µ −¯λ¯µ λµ −σλ¯µ σ¯λµ −λµ ¯λ¯µ , Jq4λ= ¯λµ ¯λ¯µ −¯λ¯µ −¯λµ λ¯µ λµ −λµ −λ¯µ . The matrix elements that are not written explicitly, are zero. Note that for these three families (subscript Kis the index of each individual family):J−1 K=1 \|µ\|2J† K,JT K=−JK. (5.10) These matrices are chosen in such a way to satisfy the three basic requirements: they are antisymmetric, non- singular (in the matrix sense), and they give the same EOM Jµν K∂νHK=fµ(x), wherefµ(x) is the right-hand side of the EOM (1.4): ˙xµ=fµ. The fact that all Hamiltonian structures must reproduce the same dynamical equations (1.4) means that for any two structures ( HA,JA) and (HB,JB) one can write: †∇BAHA=∇HB, (5.11) where†∇BA:≡RBA· ∇deﬁnes the cogradient and RBA:≡J−1 BJAisthe recursion matrix , connecting the Hamiltonian structures ( A) and (B). Equation (5.11) deﬁnes the mapping from the ﬁrst Hamiltonian structure ( A) to the second one ( B). It is interesting to assume for a moment that there exists some function HCwhose gradient is the BA-cogradient ofHB. If such a function exists, it will be an integral of motion: ∂zHC= ˙xµ∂µHC= =Jµν B∂νHB(J−1 B)µαJαβ A∂βHB= =−∂αHBJαβ A∂βHB≡0. Thus, the conserved quantity HC, if it exists, is a new Hamiltonian of the system, and the corresponding sym- plectic matrix is JC:≡RABJB=JBJ−1 AJB. One can continue along the same lines, deﬁning a series of conserved quantities (”Hamiltonians”) and the corre- sponding symplectic matrices: HA→HB→HC→ ··· ˆJA→ˆJB→ˆJC→ ···(5.12) The sequence terminates when the Hamiltonians start re- peating themselves (i.e. they became linear combinations of the previous members of the sequence). This type of sequence of the Hamiltonians and the corresponding sym- plectic matrices is common in the two-dimensional inte- grable systems. There exists a multi-Hamiltonian prop- ertyof integrable systems, whereby the chain of Hamilto- nians is (usually) non-terminating, leading to an inﬁnite set of non-equivalent IOM, and, thus, to the complete integrability of the system. In 4WM one expects that all such sequences, if they exist at all, should terminate after a few terms. For ex- ample, consider the two structures ( HA:≡HQ1,+1= q1+q2,JA) and (HB:≡HQ1,−1=q1−q2,JB), whereJA andJBare the special cases of (5.9). The recursive ma- trix is RBA:≡J−1 BJA= diag(1,−1,1,−1,1,−1,1,−1) 12and the basic identity is†∇BAHA=∇HB. The deﬁni- tion of the induced HCis ∇HC:≡†∇BAHB, (5.13) and its solution is HC=q1+q2. ThusHC=HAand the sequence is periodic: HA→HB→HA→ ···. Each Hamiltonian structure ( HK,JK) has the corre- sponding Poisson bracket: {f,g}K:≡(∇f)TJK(∇g). (5.14) This bracket is antisymmetric {g,f}K=−{f,g}K, and can be characterized by the set of basic brackets: {xµ,xν}K=Jµν K. (5.15) However, a bracket so deﬁned does not satisfy the ex- pected Jacobi identity {f,{g,h}K}K+ cyclic ≡0. The tensor of non-Jacobianity measures the violation of the Jacobi identity: Ωµνα (K):≡ {{xµ,xν}K,xα}K+cyclic = = (∂σJµν K)Jσα+cyclic. (5.16) This tensor is essentially the same as the tensor of de- ﬂection from the Bianchi identity, ω:≡dˆF(i.e.ωµνα:≡ ∂µFνα+cyclic ): Ωµνα (K)=Jµµ′ KJνν′ KJαα′ Kω(K)µ′ν′α′. (5.17) In the case of non-singular J, the Jacobi condition is equivalent to the Bianchi identity. In the system at hand, the fact that Ω (K)is not dis- appearing is the consequence of the non-constancy of µ. For example, take again the Hamiltonian H=HQ1,+1= q1+q2. Then J=µE++ ¯µE−, (5.18) where E+= 1 0 0 −1 0 1 −1 0 , E−= 0 1 −1 0 1 0 0 −1 .Note that ET ±=−E±,E±·E∓= 0, and (E±)2=−1 2[18±σ3⊗σ3⊗σ3]. (5.19) As a simple consequence of these expressions, the follow- ing identity is valid (αE++βE−)−1=−1 αE+−1 βE−, (5.20) for arbitrary (nonzero) αandβ. This identity is used to evaluate the ”ﬁeld strength” matrix: F=−1 µE+−1 ¯µE−. (5.21) From this, one obtains ωµνα=1 µ2[(∂αµ)(E+)µν+cyclic ]+ +{µ→¯µ,E+→E−}. (5.22) For example, ωB1,B4,¯B2=−1 µ2∂1µ. Thus, the Bianchi identity is clearly broken, and one can not ﬁnd the po- tential Aµ(x) such that Fµν(x) is its strength tensor. One can see the dual nature of the same obstacle, ex- pressed in terms of the Poisson bracket, in the following way. The basic brackets are /braceleftbig B1,¯B3/bracerightbig PB=µ,/braceleftbig B2,¯B4/bracerightbig PB= ¯µ. (5.23) and one non-vanishing component of Ω is ΩB1¯B3B2=−¯µ¯∂4µ. (5.24) The full list of non-vanishing components of Ω is given in the Appendix F. Thus, the Poisson bracket is not self-consistent: one can not apply it consecutively on the phase space without running into inconsistencies. This is the second, and much more serious problem with the presented approach to casting the 4WM system in the Hamiltonian form. One can say that the 4WM system has apseudo-Hamiltonian structure . If all components of ωwere zero, one would be able to ﬁnd the potential functions Aµof strength tensor Fµν=∂µAν−∂νAµ. Then the system could be formu- lated as the Lagrangian one, with the action functional S(z1,z2) :≡/integraltextz2 z1dzL(x,˙x), where the Lagrangian func- tion is L(x,˙x) :≡˙xµAµ(x)−H(x). (5.25) The Euler-Lagrange EOM corresponding to this La- grangian are the Hamilton equations (5.6). The elements of the Lagrangian formalism are provided in Appendix G. Sinceω/ne}ationslash= 0, one may search for the solutions in the form Fµν=f(∂µAν−∂νAµ), (5.26) 13which leads to (∂αf)Fµν+cyclic =fωαβγ. (5.27) The direct consequence of this equation is ∂αlnf=1 2D−2ωαµνJνµ(5.28) where 2D= 8 in the 4WM system. After some algebra one derives ∂αlnf=−∂αln\|µ\|+i 3(σ3⊗σ3⊗σ3)αν∂νφ. (5.29) whereφ= arg(µ). C. The Γ∈Rcase Ifφis constant (i.e. Γ ∈R), the solution of Eq. (5.29) isf= 1/\|µ\|. Then ˜Fµν=−¯ν(E+)µν−ν(E−)µν, where ˜Fµν:≡Fµν/f=∂µAν−∂νAµ, and the solution for the potential Aµis Aµ=−1 2/bracketleftig ¯ν(E+)µν+ν(E−)µν/bracketrightig xν, (5.30) withν= exp(iφ) (not to be confused with the index ν). To construct the action for this case one has to go one step back. The factorization of f= 1/\|µ(x)\|from Fµνis equivalent to the introduction of a new time pa- rameterθ(z) :≡/integraltextz 0dz′M(z′) +const. into EOM, where M(z) :≡ \|µ(x(z))\|is the on-shell value of \|µ(x)\|. Thus ˜Fµνdxν dθ=∂µH(x). The constant ”ﬁeld-strength” formˆ˜Fis closed, and its tensor of non-Jacobianity ˜ ωdisappears. So, one can con- struct the action in the rescaled time S(θ1,θ2) =/integraldisplayθ2 θ1dθ/bracketleftbigg1 2xµ˜Fµνdxν dθ−H(x)/bracketrightbigg .(5.31) Further transformation of this action S=/integraldisplayz2 z1dzM(z)/bracketleftbigg1 2xµ˜Fµν1 M(z)dxν dz−H(x)/bracketrightbigg = =/integraldisplayz2 z1dz/bracketleftbigg1 2xµ˜Fµνdxν dz− M(z)H(x)/bracketrightbigg , leads to the Lagrangian L=−1 2˙xµ/bracketleftig ¯ν(E+)µν+ν(E−)µν/bracketrightig xν+ −M(z)(q1+q2), (5.32)Note that if in the above expression M(z) is directly re- placed by \|µ(x)\|, the obtained corresponding variation equations are wrong. In the Γ ∈Rcase the set of IOM is enlarged by the ”ex- ceptional” IOM {w1−6}(and their complex conjugates), and one can construct some additional families of (linear in IOM) Hamiltonians ( ǫ=±1,\|λ\|= 1,\|θ\|= 1): HW1,ǫ=w1+ǫσw2, HW3,λ=λw3+¯λ¯w3, HW5,λ=λw5+¯λ¯w5, HW4,λθ=1 2(λw4+¯λ¯w4+θw6+¯θ¯w6).(5.33) The corresponding symplectic matrices are JW1ǫ= σ ǫσ 1 ǫ −σ −ǫσ −1 −ǫ , JW3λ= −λσ −¯λσ λσ ¯λσ −¯λσ −λσ ¯λσ λσ , JW5λ= −σ¯λ σ¯λ −¯λ ¯λ −σλ σλ λ −λ , JW4λθ= ¯λ σ¯θ −¯λ −σ¯θ λ σθ −λ −σθ . These matrices JW···do not depend on µ, i.e. they are constant. So, their Poisson brackets satisfy the Jacobi identity. This is the case not only for the real, but also for the complex coupling Γ. However, the Hamiltonians (5.33) are not IOM for the complex Γ. To sum up the results, for a general Γ two types of pseudo-Hamitonian structures exist: •(HQ,JQ): Hamiltonians HQare linear in regular IOM. They are conserved quantities in general case, but the corresponding ﬁeld-strength forms ˆFQare non-closed 14dˆFQ/ne}ationslash= 0. The defect of this type is the non-closeness of its symplectic structure. •(HW,JW): Hamiltonians HWare linear in excep- tional (Γ ∈R) IOM. The corresponding ﬁeld-strength forms ˆFWare constant and closed in general case. The defect of this type of structure is the nonconservation of W-Hamiltonians (in general, Γ ∈Ccase). In the case of real coupling, both defects disappear, the ﬁrst one after rescaling z→θ(z), and the second one because W-Hamiltonians become constant. Then one can construct a consistent Hamiltonian structure for the 4WM system. VI. CONCLUSIONS In summary, the algebraic structures of the 4WM equa- tions in PR crystals were studied. First, the form of the equations of motion was used to group the basic ﬁelds into two doublets, leading to the new form of EOM, resembling the Dirac equation in one dimension (”time”), with the ﬁeld-dependent mass ma- trix. This lead to the simple procedure for ﬁnding the complete set of ”regular” (i.e. present in the complex Γ case) integrals of motion. Then an alternative but closely related procedure, based on the Lax pair approach, was used to check the completeness of the obtained set of IOM. Both procedures were extended to the special case Γ∈R, to obtain an additional (”exceptional”) set of IOM. Afterwards, the concept of symmetries of the ”regular” IOM was deﬁned (the I-symmetries), and the Lie algebras (and groups) corresponding to the linear I-symmetries were found. These are the su(2) symmetry for the trans- mission gratings and the su(1,1) symmetry for the reﬂec- tion gratings. The initial doublets of basic ﬁelds, which were introduced as a convenience for more compact cal- culations, turned out to be the fundamental (i.e. spinor) representation of those symmetry algebras. Also, the Lax matrices, constructed from these basic spinors, transform in the regular way, i.e. they form the adjoint representa- tion of the I-symmetries. In the special case Γ ∈Rthe number of IOM increases, so only the subset of ”regular” I-symmetries survives. This is to be expected, since the I-symmetries now have to satisfy a larger set of constraints than in the general (Γ∈C) case. In the second part of the paper another type of sym- metries was considered, the symmetries of EOM (the E- symmetries). The corresponding symmetry algebras are the products of several abelian factors (one noncompact ∼R1, and two compact ∼u(1)) and of one su(1,1) factor (for both geometries). The action of these symmetries on the regular IOM was studied and a special kind of N¨ other theorem is found to be valid here.In the special case Γ ∈Rthe number of independent EOM gets smaller, leading to the increase in the number of E-symmetries. This is clearly the opposite behavior to the case of I-symmetries. Further study is necessary to clarify the relation between the ”regular” and ”excep- tional” cases. At the end of this part, the action of the E-symmetries on the I-symmetries was considered (in the ”regular” case). The non-abelian factor of E-symmetries commutes with the I-symmetries, and the two u(1) fac- tors act as rotations in the 1 −2 plane of I-symmetries. As a short excursion from the algebraic orientation of the paper, Section IV is devoted to the solutions of EOM in two ”exceptional” cases: Γ ∈Rand Γ ∈iR. In both cases it is relatively straightforward to obtain the gen- eral solutions (two methods for Γ ∈Rwere presented and one for Γ ∈iR), but satisfying the boundary con- ditions characteristic of 4WM geometries required more attention. In the last Section one possible approach to the Hamil- tonian formulation of the 4WM system was discussed. The problems that occurred in that program were two- fold: the non-uniqueness of the choice of the Hamiltonian (Hamilton’s function), and the non-closeness of the ﬁeld- strength 2-form. The ﬁrst problem leads to the recog- nition of the multi-Hamiltonian nature of the 4WM sys- tem, and is not really a problem. It is just the type of the ”gauge-symmetry” of EOM. The second problem, how- ever, is the real obstacle to the fulﬁllment of the program. The structure of this obstacle is topological (the violatio n of the Jacobi and Bianchi identities). This was studied for one speciﬁc ”gauge” (the choice of the Hamiltonian), and a special circumstance when this obstacle can be re- moved was found, essentially corresponding to the Γ ∈R case. The same Γ ∈Rcase was then treated in a diﬀerent way, leading to the discovery of even bigger space of pos- sible Hamiltonians. The topological obstacle is absent in this case, and nothing prevents a full consistent applica- tion of the Hamilton formalism, and identiﬁcation of the corresponding Hamiltonian action of the system. Future work: The presented work contains several topics that deserve future attention. Questions pertaining to the general class of dynamic systems: Clarifying the freedom of choice of Hamilto- nian function among IOM; Studying properties of E- symmetries upon the local (i.e. x-dependent) scalings of the dynamic vector ﬁeld /vectorF; Finding classes of equiva- lency of the symplectic form ˆJ(under such scalings) that have the same structure of the tensor of non-Jacobianity ω; etc. Questions related to the 4WM system in particular: Full relation between the Γ ∈Rand Γ ∈CE-symmetries; Explicit resolution of boundary conditions in Γ ∈Ccase; Extending the theory to multiple gratings; etc. The last question is particularly intriguing. Even in 15the case of single gratings, 4WM EOM possess rich al- gebraic structure. However, the writing of gratings in a photorefractive crystal is a dynamic holographic process, and more than one grating can coexist simultaneously in the same region of the crystal. EOM then contain terms coming from diﬀerent types of gratings, and the analysis should be much more involved. Acknowledgements: One of the authors (PLS) ex- presses gratitude to the Brown University for support during the graduate years, when some of the ideas ex- plored in this work were conceived and partially devel- oped. APPENDIX A: THE σ-METRIC ELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS. The elementary deﬁnitions and relations of the cand sfunctions are listed in this Appendix: c(σ,x) :≡cos(√σx) =/braceleftbigg cos(gα), cosh(α), s(σ,x) :≡sin(√σx)/√σ=/braceleftbigg sin(α), sinh(α), (A1) where the upper/lower option corespond to σ= +1/−1 signs. c(σ,x)2+σs(σ,x)2= 1, (A2) 2c(σ,x)s(σ,x) =s(σ,2x), 2c(σ,x)2= 1 +c(σ,2x), 2σs(σ,x)2= 1−c(σ,2x), c(σ,x)2−σs(σ,x)2=c(σ,2x), (A3) t(σ,x) :≡s(σ,x)/c(σ,x), ct(σ,x) :≡1/t(σ,x), (A4) t(σ,x) +σct(σ,x) = 2σ/s(σ,2x), t(σ,x)−σct(σ,x) =−2σct(σ,2x), (A5) c′(σ,x) =−σs(σ,x), s′(σ,x) =c(σ,x). (A6) APPENDIX B: AN ALTERNATIVE LAXIAN APPROACH In order to achieve a suﬃcient degree of generality, one should use the ”big spinor” \|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht:≡ B1 αB3 βB4 γB2 , (B1)with arbitrary complex numbers α,βandγ. Its evolution equation is ∂z\|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=N \|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (B2) where N= 0σµ/α 0 0 −α¯µ 0 0 0 0 0 0 −βµ/γ 0 0 σγ¯µ/β 0 .(B3) The problem is to determine the evolving member of the Lax pair. 1.L ∼ \|Ψ/angbracketright /angbracketleftΨ\| The matrix Lis searched ﬁrst in the form L= A\|Ψ/an}b∇acket∇i}ht/an}b∇acketle{tΨ\|B, where AandBare some constant matrices. Then ∂zL=ANA−1L+LB−1N†B. (B4) Require B−1N†B=−ANA−1, (B5) i.e. N†C=−CN, (B6) where C:≡ BA . The solution of this equations is C= ¯αξ2¯αµξ1 ¯αξ4 ¯αµξ3 −α¯µξ1σ αξ2σγ¯µ βξ3−β γξ4 σ¯γ ¯βξ6σ¯γµ ¯βξ5σ¯γ ¯βξ8σ¯γµ ¯βξ7 α¯µξ5−σ αξ6−σγ¯µ βξ7−β γξ8 .(B7) In the general case of complex Γ the factor µis non- constant (with respect to z), and some of the parameters ξhave to be set to zero: ξ1=ξ3=ξ5=ξ7= 0. However, if Γ is real, the phase factor ν:≡exp(iargµ) is constant, and one may redeﬁne the time variable z→θ, to absorb the non-constant absolute value \|µ(z)\|. In eﬀect this per- mits the full set of non-zero ξin the above matrix C(with the replacement µ→ν). Let us consider the general case. The presence of four non-zero ξparameters indicates the existence of four IOM: IOM ξ2= ¯α(I1+σI3) = ¯αq1, IOM ξ8=β¯γ(I2+σI4) =β¯γq2, IOM ξ4= ¯αβ(¯B1B4−¯B3B2) = ¯αβ¯q3, IOM ξ6=σ¯γ(¯B4B1−¯B2B3) =σ¯γq3, (B8) where IOM ξi:≡Tr∂L ∂ξi=/angbracketleftbigg Ψ/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle∂C ∂ξi/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleΨ/angbracketrightbigg . (B9) 16These integrals are the already known ”regular” IOM. Onlyq4is not obtained in this way. It will be obtained in the next subsection, with a diﬀerent choice of L. In the Γ ∈Rcase, there are eight free parameters ( ξ) and there should be eight IOM. The ﬁrst four of them are the ”regular” ones {q1,q2,q3,¯q3}, and the additional four are: IOM ξ1=\|α\|2(ν¯B1B3−¯ν¯B1B3) =\|α\|2w1, IOM ξ7=σ\|γ\|2(ν¯B4B2−¯νB4¯B2) =−\|γ\|2w2, IOM ξ3= ¯αγ(ν¯B1B2+σ¯ν¯B3B4) =−σ¯αγw3, IOM ξ5=−σα¯γ¯w3. (B10) Here, again, all obtained integrals are already known. They are the elements of the w-set derived in the spino- rial approach. The remaining elements of that set will be obtained in the next subsection. 2.L ∼ \|Ψ/angbracketright/angbracketleftbig¯Ψ/vextendsingle/vextendsingle Now search for Lin the form L=A/vextendsingle/vextendsingle¯Ψ/angbracketrightbig /an}b∇acketle{tΨ\|B, where AandBare some constant matrices (diﬀerent from the ones in the previous subsection). Then ∂zL=ANA−1L+LB−1NTB, (B11) and the requirement that Lsatisﬁes the Lax-type evolu- tion equation has the form: B−1NTB=−ANA−1, (B12) i.e. NTC=−CN, (B13) where, again, C:≡ BA . The solution to this condition is C= α¯µξ2ξ1α¯µξ8αξ5 −ξ1σµ αξ2σγ βξ5−βµ γξ8 σ¯µ βξ7σγ βξ6σγ¯µ βξ4ξ3 αξ6−µ αξ7−ξ3−βµ γξ4 .(B14) In the Γ ∈Ccase one has to set ξ2=ξ8=ξ7=ξ4= 0 and the remaining ξparameters give rise to the following four ”regular” IOM: IOM ξ1≡0, IOM ξ3≡0, IOM ξ5=αγ(B1B2+σB3B4) =αγq4, IOM ξ6=αγq4. (B15) The Γ ∈Rcase has additional wintegrals: IOM ξ2=α(¯νB2 1+σνB2 3) =αw4, IOM ξ4=βγ(σ¯νB2 4+νB2 2) =βγw6, IOM ξ8=αβ(¯νB1B4−νB3B2) =αβw5, IOM ξ7=γw5. (B16) In this way, the full sets of ”regular” ( q-set) and ”excep- tional” (w-set) IOMs are reconstructed. The presence of the arbitrary complex constants α,βandγin the pro- cedure indicates that there are no additional IOM of the bilinear type.APPENDIX C: HYPERBOLOIDS IN R4 InR4there exist four diﬀerent types of the normalized ”hyperboloids”, deﬁned by y2 1+ǫ2y2 2+ǫ3y2 3+ǫ4y2 4= 1: ǫ2ǫ3ǫ4 H3 (4,0)+1+1+1 H3 (3,1)+1+1−1 H3 (2,2)+1−1−1 H3 (1,3)−1−1−1 H3 (4,0)is just another name for the sphere S3, and H3 (2,2) is the hyperboloid H3relevant for this work. APPENDIX D: ORDERED EXPONENTIAL In this appendix some general properties of the matrix U(z) are discussed. The basic 4WM EOM (2.7) has a formal solution \|ψi(z)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht=U(z)\|ψi(0)/an}b∇acket∇i}ht, (D1) where U(z) satisﬁes the initial value problem ∂zU(z) =m(z)U(z), U(0) = 1. (D2) One can write the formal solution to this equation in the form U(z) :≡/parenleftbigg exp/parenleftbigg/integraldisplayz 0dz′m(z′)/parenrightbigg/parenrightbigg +(D3) which is called the (Path) Ordered Exponential (OE). The notion of ordering is referring here to the right-to-left multiplication of the factors in the deﬁnition of OE: /parenleftig e(/integraltextz 0dz′m(z′))/parenrightig +:≡lim N→∞0/productdisplay α=Ne(z Nm(αz N)),(D4) i.e. one alternates the inﬁnitesimal integrations (along the path between the z′= 0 andz′=z) and exponenti- ations of, in such a way obtained, inﬁnitesimal matrices. OE is an entirely diﬀerent object from the ordinary ma- trix exponential exp(/integraltextz 0dz′m(z′)), where the whole inte- gration along the path is performed ﬁrst, and then only one exponentiation executed on this integrated matrix. The source of the diﬀerence is in the non-commutativity of the matrices m(z) evaluated at diﬀerent points. 17The methods to evaluate OE are frequently non-exact: one may easily prove that the knowledge of U(z) for arbi- trarym(z) is equivalent to the knowledge of the solution to the Schr¨ odinger equation for an arbitrary complex po- tential (and this is known to be a non-solvable problem). However, in the cases when m(z) has one of the several special forms, the exact solution for U(z) can be found. Two such cases are encountered in this work: •for Γ∈Rthe matrix m(z) is proportional to the con- stant matrix ˜m(z) =/parenleftbigg 0σν −¯ν0/parenrightbigg , and all commutators [m(z),m(z′)] are equal to zero. Thus, OE reduces to the ordinary exponential, and the result is displayed in Eq. (4.11). •for Γ∈iRthe matrix m(z) has the raising and the lowering components that oscillate with the opposite fre- quencies Ω. The Appendix E gives one possible way to obtain U(z) for such an m(z). In the general case, the OE U(z) satisﬁes several sim- ple identities, induced by the properties of m(z): •From the tracelessness of m(z) follows the unimodal- ity condition det U(z) = 1 ( ∀z): detU= lim N→∞0/productdisplay α=Ndet/bracketleftig exp/parenleftigz Nm/parenleftig αz N/parenrightig/parenrightig/bracketrightig = = lim N→∞0/productdisplay α=Nexp/parenleftigz NTrm/parenleftig αz N/parenrightig/parenrightig = = lim N→∞0/productdisplay α=Nexp(0) = 1. (D5) •From the membership of m(z) in the Lie alge- brag:≡su((3 +σ)/2,(1−σ)/2) it follows that U(z) is an element of the corresponding Lie group G:≡ SU((3 +σ)/2,(1−σ)/2): U(z)†ηU(z) =η, (D6) where theη=n1=/parenleftbigg 1 0 0σ/parenrightbigg is the metric matrix of the algebrag. To check this identity, one should follow the chain of arguments: m/parenleftig αz N/parenrightig ∈g⇒z Nm/parenleftig αz N/parenrightig ∈g ⇒exp/parenleftigz Nm/parenleftig αz N/parenrightig/parenrightig ∈ G ⇒/productdisplay αexp/parenleftigz Nm/parenleftig αz N/parenrightig/parenrightig ∈ G ⇒U(z)∈ G. (D7) APPENDIX E: ORDERED EXPONENTIAL SOLUTION FOR Γ∈IR In this appendix the initial value problem ∂zU(z) =m(z)U(z), U(0) = 1, (E1)is solved for Γ imaginary. Starting with the ansatz Uij(z) =u11exp(iωijz), (E2) one obtains a set of conditions ω21=ω11+ Ω, ω12=ω22−Ω, u21 u11=iω11 σµ0=−¯µ0 iω21, u12 u22=iω22 −¯µ0=σµ0 iω12. (E3) The second pair of these conditions deﬁnes the consis- tency conditions ω11ω21=ω12ω22=σ\|µ0\|2, (E4) which are converted into auxiliary equations: ω2 11+ Ωω11−σ\|µ0\|2= 0, ω2 22−Ωω22−σ\|µ0\|2= 0. (E5) Solutions to these quadratic equations are ω11±=ω12±= (−Ω±Ξ)/2, ω21±=ω22±= (+Ω ±Ξ)/2, (E6) where Ξ : ≡˜Γ√q/Iandq:≡q2 5+ 4σ\|Q\|2. Then Uij=uij+exp(izωij+) +uij−exp(izωij−),(E7) and one has to solve the remaining conditions u21± u11±=iσω11± µ0, u12± u22±=−iω22± ¯µ0, (E8) in conjunction with the initial conditions u11++u11−= 1, u12++u12−= 0, u21++u21−= 0, u22++u22−= 1. (E9) The solution is u11+=−ω11− Σ, u 11−= +ω11+ Σ, u22+=−ω22− Σ, u 22−= +ω22+ Σ, u12+=−iσµ0 Σ, u 12−= +iσµ0 Σ, u21+= +i¯µ0 Σ, u 21−=−i¯µ0 Σ, (E10) leading to the ﬁnal form: U11= exp/parenleftbigg −iΩz 2/parenrightbigg /bracketleftbigg cos/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg +iΩ Ξsin/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg , U12=i2σQ√qexp/parenleftbigg −iΩz 2/parenrightbigg sin/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg , U21=−i2σ¯Q√qexp/parenleftbigg iΩz 2/parenrightbigg sin/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg , U22= exp/parenleftbigg iΩz 2/parenrightbigg /bracketleftbigg cos/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg −iΩ Ξsin/parenleftbiggΞz 2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg . (E11) It is easy to check the unimodality condition det U(z) = 1 (∀z). 18APPENDIX F: COMPONENTS OF Ω The non-vanishing components of Ω are ΩB1¯B3B2=−¯µ¯∂4µ, ΩB1¯B3B3=−¯µ¯∂1µ, ΩB1¯B3B4= +¯µ¯∂2µ, ΩB1¯B3¯B1=−¯µ∂3µ, ΩB1¯B3¯B2=−µ∂4µ, ΩB1¯B3¯B3= +µ∂1µ, ΩB1¯B3¯B4= +¯µ∂3µ, ΩB2¯B4B1=−µ¯∂3¯µ, ΩB2¯B4B3= +¯µ¯∂1¯µ, ΩB2¯B4B4= +µ¯∂2¯µ, ΩB2¯B4¯B1=−¯µ∂3¯µ, ΩB2¯B4¯B2=−µ∂4¯µ, ΩB2¯B4¯B3= +µ∂1¯µ, ΩB2¯B4¯B4= +¯µ∂2¯µ. (F1) APPENDIX G: LAGRANGE FORMULATION OF GENERALIZED HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS 1. From the singular Lagrangian to the generalized Hamiltonian dynamics The singular Lagrangian ( µ∈1,D): L=Aµ(x) ˙xµ−V(x), (G1) generates the Euler-Lagrange equations of motion: Eµ:≡∂L ∂xµ−d dt∂L ∂˙xµ=Fµν˙xν−∂µV= 0,(G2) whereFµν:≡∂µAν−∂νAµis the tensor of the ”ﬁeld strength”. If it is nonsingular (det F/ne}ationslash= 0; possible only for evenD), its inverse, the tensor of symplectic struc- tureJ:≡F−1can be deﬁned. Then Eq. (G2) have the form of the generalized Hamilton equations: ˙xµ=Jµν∂νV. (G3) To initiate the Hamilton formulation, one starts with the deﬁnition of canonical momenta pµ:≡∂L ∂˙xµ=Aµ(x), (G4) and of the (naively deﬁned) Hamiltonian function H:≡pµ˙xµ−L. (G5) The deﬁnitions of momenta (G4) are supposed to be (non-singular) contact transformations replacing veloc- ities ˙xµby the momenta pν, thus allowing (by inversion) to express the velocities ˙ xµin terms of the momenta pµ. Here, however, these equations are singular: the ve- locities do not ﬁgure (at all) on their right-hand-sides (RHS). Thus, instead of being the (successful) contacttransformations, these equations are the constraints on the Hamiltonian dynamics of system: κµ:≡pµ− A µ(x). (G6) Constraints obtained from the contact transformations are called the primary constraints , implying that there may be some additional constraints in the system (all these additional constraints are called secondary constraints ). Hamiltonian systems with constraints are treated by the Dirac method which outlines are given in the rest of this Appendix. For the speciﬁc system at hand, the naively deﬁned Hamiltonian (G5) has the arbitrary weighted terms pro- portional to primary constraints: H=V+κµ˙xµ≃V (G7) Its unique (non-arbitrary) part is called the Canonical Hamiltonian Hc=V. For the further purposes, one needs the (temptative) Total Hamiltonian : H′ T=Hc+κµvµ. (G8) wherevµare the Lagrange multipliers , for this mo- ment taken to be arbitrary functions of time z. The prime onH′ Tdenotes the temptative nature of this quan- tity: once when (and if) the Lagrange multipliers are determined (i.e. replaced with suitable functions over phase space), this quantity will be replaced by symbol HT. One can not know apriory what values will vs ac- quire. Instead, the (Dirac’s) constraint analysis has to be performed to determine the full set of constraints in the system and then to classify the constraints as either the ﬁrst class (ones that commute in a weak sense with all other constraints) or the second class (ones that are not of the ﬁrst class). Then, the Lagrange multipliers standing next to the primary constraints of the second class will be determined as a speciﬁc functions on the phase space, while the Lagrange multipliers correspond- ing to the primary constraints of the ﬁrst class will stay undetermined. Presence of the second class constraints leads to the reduction of the phase space, while the ﬁrst class constraint generate the gauge transformations (on the phase space). The phase space Γ = {(x,p)\|∀x,p∈RD}possesses the Poisson bracket : {f,g}PB:≡∂f ∂xµ∂g ∂pµ−∂f ∂pµ∂g ∂xµ. (G9) The evolution of any function fon the phase space Γ is deﬁned by df dt={f,H′ T}PB. (G10) The consistency equations of the primary constraints dκµ dt={κµ,H′ T}PB=−∂µV+Fµνvν= 0,(G11) 19can be solved if F= (Fµν) is non-singular, giving the ﬁnal expression for the Lagrange multipliers: vµ=Jµν∂νV, (G12) IfFis singular, some components of the RHS of Eq. (G11) can not be solved for v, and one has to deﬁne the secondary constrains (and then to check their con- sistency, and so on). In this work, only the case of non- singular Fis discused. Here, all primary constrains are of the second class, i.e. each of them has (at least) one other constraint that does not commute (in Poisson bracket sense) with it. This is easy to see from {κµ,κν}PB=Fµν(x), (G13) and the non-singularity of the matrix F. Constraints of the second class reduce the phase space of the system (whereas the ﬁrst class constraints, if they existed, would be the gauge symmetries of the corresponding action). To successfully perform the reduction of phase space, one needs to replace the Poisson brackets with the Dirac brackets, deﬁned as: {f,g}DB:≡ {f,g}PB− {f,κµ}PBJµν{κν,g}PB. (G14) With respect to this structure, the connections κare con- stant, i.e. every function f(x,p) on the phase space com- mutes with them: {f,κµ}DB= 0. (G15) On this way, one can consistently work with the reduced phase space Γ∗:≡Γ/{κ= 0}={(x,p=A(x))\|∀x∈ RD}. The Poisson bracket on this space is deﬁned as {f,g}PB on Γ∗:≡ {f,g}DB on Γ\|κ=0. (G16) Since the coordinates xµdo not commute with respect to the Dirac bracket {xµ,xν}DB=Jµν, (G17) on the space Γ, their Poisson bracket on Γ∗are non- vanishing, too: {xµ,xν}PB on Γ∗=Jµν\|Γ∗. (G18) From non-singularity of the tensor Jone can conclude that the half of coordinates xcan be used as the real coordinates on the Γ∗, and rest of them are the corre- sponding conjugated momenta.2. When the generalized Hamiltonian dynamics has the Lagrangian formulation? One can turn any even-dimensional generalized Hamil- tonian system (given by Eqs (G3)) into the Lagrangian (G1) iﬀ: a) Matrix Jis nonsingular, so one can deﬁne its inverse F, and b) 2-form ˆF:≡1 2Fµνdxµ∧dxνis closed, i.e. satisﬁes the Darboux condition dˆF= 0. The two conditions are (in a simple connected region Uof the phase space: π1(U) = 0) suﬃcient to assure the existence of ”potentials” /vectorA=Aµdxµ, such that ˆFis ex- act 2-form ˆF=d/vectorA(and, therefore, closed). Under these conditions the potentials are: Aµ(x) =1 2/integraldisplayx x0Fµν(y)dyν, (G19) where the integration is along any path connecting points x0andx, which belongs to the domain U, andx0is the point where Aµ(x0) = 0. The action has the form: S[t1, t2] =1 2/integraldisplayx2 x1dxν/integraldisplayx x0dyµFµν(y)−/integraldisplayt2 t1dtH(x(t)). (G20) The ﬁrst term is the weighted surface integral over the surface spanned by points x0,x1andx2. The second term is the line term, i.e. it lives only on the line that connects the points x1andx2. [1]M. Cronin-Golomb, J.O. White, B. Fisher, A. Yariv ; IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-20 , 12 (1984). [2]M. Beli´ c , Phys. Rev. A 31, 3169 (1985). [3]A. Bledowski, W. Krolikowski , Opt. Lett. 13, 146(1987). [4]A.A. Zozulya, V.T. Tikhonchuk , Sov. J. Quantum Elec- tron.18, 981 (1988). [5]D.A. Fish, A.K. Powell, T.J. Hall , Opt. Commun. 88, 28 (1992); 89, 68 (1992). [6]P. Stojkov, M. Beli´ c , Phys. Rev. A 45, 5061 (1992). Reprinted in Landmark Papers on Photorefractive nonlinear Optics , Eds: P. Yeh and C. Gu (World Sci- entiﬁc; 1995). [7]M. Beli´ c, M. Petrovi´ c , J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11, 481 (1994). [8]M. Berger ,Geometrie (Nathan, Paris, 1977). [9]K. Kowalski, W.H. Steeb , Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 713 (1991). [10]V.I. Arnold ed. ,Dynamical Systems I-IV (Springer, Berlin, 1988-90). 20
arXiv:physics/0007020v1 [physics.gen-ph] 9 Jul 2000Black Holes From Diiﬀerent Perspectives B.G. Sidharth Centre for Applicable Mathematics & Computer Sciences B.M. Birla Science Centre, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad - 500063 (India) Abstract In this paper we consider black holes from a non general relat ivistic perspective as also from a microphysical point of view. 1 Introduction It is generally believed that the concept of Black Holes requ ires General Relativity for its understanding and interpretation. In th is brief note we will show that Black Holes could also be understood without invok ing General Relativity at all. We start by deﬁning a Black Hole as an object at the surface of w hich, the escape velocity equals the maximum possible velocity in the universe viz., the velocity of light. We next use the well known equation of Kepl erian orbits[1], 1 r=GM L2(1 +ecosθ) (1) whereL, the so called impact parameter is given by, Rc, whereRis the point of closest approach, in our case a point on the surface of the o bject andcis the velocity of approach, in our case the velocity of light. Choosingθ= 0 ande≈1, we can deduce from (1) R=2GM c2(2) Equation (2) gives the Schwarzchild radius for a Black Hole a nd can be deduced from the full General Relativistic theeory[2]. We will now use (2) to exhibit Black Holes at three diﬀerent sc ales, the micro, the macro and the cosmic scales. 12 Black Holes Our starting point is the observation that a Planck mass, 10−5gmsat the Planck length, 10−33cmssatisﬁes (2) and, as such is a Schwarzchild Black Hole (Cf.ref.[3]). Infact Rosen has used non-relativistic Quantum Theory to show that such a particle is a mini universe[4]. We next come to stellar scales. It is well known that for an ele ctron gas in a highly dense mass we have[5] K/parenleftBigg¯M4/3 ¯R4−¯M2/3 ¯R2/parenrightBigg =K′¯M2 ¯R4(3) where/parenleftbiggK K′/parenrightbigg =/parenleftbigg27π 64α/parenrightbigg/parenleftBigg¯hc γm2 P/parenrightBigg ≈1040(4) and ¯M=9π 8M mP¯R=R (¯h/m ec), Mis the mass, Rthe radius of the body, mPandmeare the proton and electron masses and ¯ his the reduced Planck Constant. From (3) and (4) it is easy to see that for ¯M < 1060, there are highly condensed planet sized stars. (Infact these considerations lead to the Chandrasek har limit in stellar theory). We can also verify that for ¯Mapproaching 1060corresponding to a mass∼1036gms, or roughly a hundred to a thousand times the solar mass, the radiusRgets smaller and smaller and would be ∼108cms, so as to satisfy (2) and give a Black Hole in broad agreement with theory. Finally for the universe as a whole, using only the theory of N ewtonian gravitation, it is well known that we can deduce R∼GM c2(5) where this time R∼1028cmsis the radius of the universe and M∼1055gms is the mass of the universe. Equation (5) suggests that the universe itself is a Black Hol e. It is remarkable that if we consider the universe to be a Schwarzchild Black Ho le as suggested by (5), the time taken by a ray of light to traverse the univers e equals the age of the universe ∼1017secsas shown elsewhere [6]. 23 The Kerr-Newman Formulation for the Elec- tron It was already noted[7], that a particle with the Planck mass viz. 10−5gms could be considered to be a Schwarzchild black hole whose rad ius is of the order of the Planck length viz., 10−33cms. One could then ask whether a charged rotating black hole, that is a Kerr-Newman black hol e could represent an elementary particle with charge. Indeed the remarkable f act has been well known[2] that the purely classical Kerr-Newman metric does describe the electron, including its purely Quantum Mechanical anomalo us gyro magnetic ratiog= 2! This could have been construed to be the much sought after uniﬁcation of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, ex cept for the fact that such a Kerr-Newman electron black hole would have a nake d singularity. That is, its radius becomes complex: r+=GM c2+ıb,b≡(G2Q2 c8+a2−G2M2 c4)1/2(6) whereGis the gravitational constant Mthe mass and a≡L/Mc,L being the angular momentum. Even in the derivation of the above Kerr-Newman metric, Newm an has noted[8] the puzzling fact that an imaginary shift of coordi nates has to be invoked and that it is this imaginary shift which gives the ro tation or spin. From a classical point of view this is inexplicable. On the other hand it has been pointed out by the author[9] that the Quantum Mechanical coordinate of a Dirac electron is given by x= (c2p1H−1t+a1) +ı 2c¯h(α1−cp1H−1)H−1, (7) wherea1is an arbitrary constant and cα1is the velocity operator with eigen values ±c. It has also been noted that for the electron the imaginary par ts in (6) and (7) are of the same order, and that this imaginary coordinate was given a physical explanation long ago by Dirac[10]: This has to do wi th the famous Zitterbewegung. As space time intervals shrink, by Heisenb erg’s Uncertainty Principle the uncertainty in the momentum - energy values in creases. Thus only averages over space time intervals, speciﬁcally at the Compton scale, are 3physically meaningful. Within the Compton scale we encount er unphysical Zitterbewegung eﬀects which show up as complex (or non-Herm itian) coor- dinates (Cf.also ref.[11]). So the unsatisfactory feature of the Kerr-Newman electron b lack hole can be circumvented with the Quantum Mechanical input that rath er than space time points as in classical theory, we need to consider avera ges over Compton scale space time intervals. All this pleasingly dovetails with the fact that minumum spa ce time cut oﬀs can be taken consistently with the Lorentz transformation a s shown by Sny- der a long time ago[12]. In recent years there has ben a return to ideas of discrtee space time including through string theory[13]. F urther if the cut oﬀ is at the Compton scale ( l,τ) then we have a non commutative geometry[13] viz., [x,y] = 0(l2),[x,px] =ı¯h(1−l2) (8) and similar equations, which can be shown to directly lead to the Dirac equa- tion. In other words it is this minimum Compton scale space ti me cut oﬀ as in equation (8) which leads to the Dirac matrices, spin and th e anomalous gyro magnetic ratio g= 2. Indeed it has been noted recently by Ne’eman[14] that such a non commutative geometry provides a rationale fo r renormaliza- tion. Infact this was the motivation for the very early work o f Snyder and others in introducing discrete space time. It must be mentioned that if in (8) terms ∼l2are neglected, then we recover the usual commutation relations of Quantum theory. 4 Some Experimental Consequences The question that arises is, are there any experimental cons equences of the above formulation[15]: I. We ﬁrst observe that the magnetic component of the ﬁeld of a static elec- tron as a Kerr-Newman black hole is given in the familiar sphe rical polar coordinates by (Cf.refs.[9, 11]). Bˆr=2ea r3cosΘ + 0(1 r4),BˆΘ=easinΘ r3+ 0(1 r4),Bˆφ= 0, (9) 4whereas the electrical part is given by Eˆr=e r2+ 0(1 r3),EˆΘ= 0(1 r4),Eˆφ= 0, (10) A comparison of (9) and (10) shows that there is a magnetic com ponent of shorter range apart from the dipole which is given by the ﬁrst term on the right in equation (9). We would like to point out that a short r ange force, theB(3)force, mediated by massive photons has indeed been observed at Cornell and studied over the past few years[16]. On the other hand as the Kerr-Newman charged black hole can be approx- imated by a solenoid, we have as in the Aharonov-Bohm eﬀect, a negligible magnetic ﬁeld outdside, but at the same time a real vector pot ential/vectorAwhich would contribute to a shift in phase. Infact this shift in pha se is given by (Cf. also ref.[17]) ∆δˆB=e ¯h/contintegraldisplay /vectorA./vectords (11) There is also a similar eﬀect due to the electric charge given by ∆δˆE=−e ¯h/integraldisplay A0dt (12) whereA0is the usual electro static potential given in (10). In the ab ove Kerr- Newman formulation, ( /vectorA,A 0) of (11) and (12) are given by (Cf.refs.[9, 11]) Aσ=1 2(ηµvhµv),σ, (13) From (13) it can be seen that /vectorA∼1 cA0 (14) Substitution of (14) in (11) then gives us the contribution o f the shift in phase due to the magnetic ﬁeld. II. Let us now consider some imprints of discrete space time, as discussed in section 1. First we consider the case of the neutral pion. As is known, th is pion decays into an electron and a positron. Could we think of it as an elec tron-positron bound state also[11, 18, 19, 20]? In this case we have, mv2 r=e2 r2(15) 5Consistently with the above formulation, if we take v=cfrom (15) we get the correct Compton wavelength lπ=rof the pion. However this appears to go against the fact that there would b e pair anni- hilation with the release of two photons. Nevertheless if we consider discrete space time, the situation would be diﬀerent. In this case the Schrodinger equation Hψ=Eψ (16) whereHcontains the above Coulumb interaction could be written, in terms of the space and time separated wave function components as ( Cf. also ref.[21]), Hψ=EφT=φı¯h[T(t−τ)−T τ] (17) whereτis the minimum time cut oﬀ which in the above work has been take n to be the Compton time. If, as usual we let T=exp(irt) we get E=−2¯h τsinτr 2(18) (18) shows that if, \|E\|<2¯h τ(19) holds then there are stable bound states. Indeed inequality (19) holds good whenτis the Compton time and Eis the total energy mc2. Even if inequality (19) is reversed, there are decaying states which are relati vely stable around the cut oﬀ energy2¯h τ. This is the explanation for treating the pion as a bound state of an electron and a positron, as indeed is borne out by its decay mode. The si tuation is similar to the case of Bohr orbits– there also the electrons w ould according to classical ideas have collapsed into the nucleus and the at oms would have disappeared. In this case it is the discrete nature of space t ime which enables the pion to be a bound state as described by (15). Another imprint of discrete space time can be found in the Kao n decay puzzle, as pointed out by the author[22]. There also we have equation s like (16) and (17) above, with the energy term being given by E(1 +i), due to the fact that space time is quantized. Not only is the fact that the ima ginary and real parts of the energy are of the same order borne out but as point ed out in[22] this also explains the recently observed [23] Kaon decay and violation of the 6time reversal symmetry. In the words of Penrose[24], ”the ti ny fact of an almost completely hidden time-asymmetry seems genuinely t o be present in theK0-decay. It is hard to believe that nature is not, so to speak, t rying to tell something through the results of this delicate and beau tiful experiment.” From an intuitive point of view, the above should not be surpr ising because time or even space reversal symmetry is based on a space time c ontinuum and is no longer obvious if space time were discrete. Indeed this can be seen from equation (8): If we retain terms ∼l2then there is no invariance under not just time but also space reﬂe ctions. It is within this framework that we can also explain the handednes s of the nearly massless neutrino: It has a comparatively large Compton wav elengthland by (8) space reﬂection symmetry no longer holds. References [1] Goldstein, H., 1966 ”Classical Mechanics”, Addison-We sley, Reading, Mass., p76. [2] Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., and Wheeler, J.A., 1973 ”Gra vitation”, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, p883. [3] Sidharth, B.G., 2000 ”Comment on the paper... ” Chaos, So litons and Fractals, 21(41) L25-26. [4] Rosen, N., 1993 International Journal of Theoretical Ph ysics, 32 (8), 1435-1440. [5] Huang, K., 1975 ”Statistical Mechanics”, Wiley Eastern , New Delhi,pp230-237. [6] Sidharth, B.G., 1999 in Proceedings of Eighth Marcel Gro ssmann Meet- ing on General Relativity, T. Piran and Remo Ruﬃni (Eds.), Wo rld Scientiﬁc, Singapore,pp479-481. [7] Sidharth, B.G., 2000 Comment on the paper...” Chaos, Sol itons and Fractals, 21(41) L25-26. [8] Newman, E.T., 1973 J.Math.Phys.14 (1) p102. 7[9] Sidharth, B.G., 1998 Int.J.Mod.Phys.A., 13(15), pp259 9-2612. [10] Dirac, P.A.M., 1958 ”Principles of Quantum Mechanics” , Clarendon Press, Oxford, p263. [11] Sidharth, B.G., 1997 Ind.J. of Pure and Applied Phys., 3 5, pp456-471. [12] Snyder, H.S., 1947 Phys. Rev. 71(1), 38ﬀ. [13] Sidharth, B.G., 2000 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 11 ( 8), p1269-1278. [14] Ne’eman, Y., 1999 in Proceedings of Frontiers of Fundam ental Physics, (Eds.) B.G. Sidharth and A. Burinskii, Universities Press, Hyderabad, pp83-96. [15] Sidharth, B.G., ”Issues in Quantized Fractal Space Tim e” to appear in Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. [16] Evans, M.W., 1997 ”Origin, Observation and Consequenc es of theB(3) Field” in The Present Status of the Quantum Theory of Light, S . Jeﬀers et al. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp1 17-125 and several other references therein. [17] Feynman, R.P., 1965 ”The Feynman Lectures on Physics”, Vol II, Addison-Wesley, Mass, p15-10-15-13. [18] Sidharth, B.G., and Lobanov, Yu Yu, 1999 Proceedings of Frontiers of Fundamental Physics, (Eds.) B.G. Sidharth and A. Burinskii , Universi- ties Press, Hyderabad, pp68-74. [19] Sidharth, B.G., 1999 Mod.Phys.Lett.A., Vol.14 No.5, p p387-389. [20] Sidharth, B.G., 1997 Mod.Phys.Lett.A., Vol.12 No.32, pp2469-2471. [21] Wolf C., 1994 Nuovo.Cim.B 109 (3), 213. [22] Sidharth, B.G., 2000 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 11, 1045-1046. [23] Angelopoulos, A., et al., 1998 Phys.Lett.B 444, 43. [24] Hawking, S., Israel, W., 1979 General Relativity: An Ei nstein Centenary Survey, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp581-638 . 8
arXiv:physics/0007021v1 [physics.gen-ph] 9 Jul 2000THE UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM AND GRAVITATION IN THE CONTEXT OF QUANTIZED FRACTAL SPACE TIME B.G. Sidharth∗ Centre for Applicable Mathematics & Computer Sciences B.M. Birla Science Centre, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 063 (India) Abstract The attempts to unify electromagnetism and gravitation hav e in- cluded the formulations of Herman Weyl and the Kaluza Klein t heory with the ﬁfth dimension. More recently there have been fruit ful at- tempts in the domain of Quantum Superstrings and the author’ s for- mulation in terms of Quantum Mechanical Kerr-Newman Black H oles. Though all these appear to be widely divergent approaches, t hey are shown to have a uniﬁed underpinning in the context of quantiz ed frac- tal space time. 1 Introduction The problem of the uniﬁcation of gravitation and electromag netism has a long and as yet unconcluded history. The very early attempt of Wey l did not ﬁnd favour [1] as he had incorporated electromagnetism into the ﬁeld equation, as it were from outside[2]. The ingenous suggestion of Kaluza t hat a ﬁfth, and somehow suppressed, dimension be introduced [3, 1] also did not ﬁnd favour, 0∗Email:birlasc@hd1.vsnl.net.in; birlard@ap.nic.in 1though the idea has resurfaced in the theory of Quantum Super strings[4]. Another approach has been that of Quantum Mechanical Black H oles which recovers the Kerr-Newman metric in the context of quantized fractal space time (QFST)[5, 6, 7]. While there is formal resemblance to th e Weyl for- mulation on the one hand, there is an imaginary shift of coord inates, quite meaningful in the above context, on the other. In the derivat ion of the Kerr Newman metric too[8], there is a mysterious imaginary shift which however is not explicable in classical theory. Finally both in Quant um Superstrings and the (QFST) or quantized fractal space time picture, the u nderlying ge- ometry is non-commutative [9, 10, 4]. So there are in these scenarios several at ﬁrst sight dispara te and even inex- plicable strands: the Kaluza-Klein curled up extra dimensi on, Weyl’s electro- magnetism, Quantum Mechanical Black Holes, Quantum Supers trings, the Kerr-Newman metric, non-commutative geometry.... We will now show that infact all these characteristics have a uniﬁed underpinnin g in the context of quantiﬁed fractal space time (QFST). 2 The Kaluza-Klein and Weyl Formulations Our starting point is the fact that the fractal dimension of a Brownian quan- tum path is 2, as pointed out by Abbott and Wise, Nottale and ot hers[11, 12]. This was further analysed by the author and it was explained t hat this is symptomatic of quantized fractal space time and it was shown that infact the coordinate xbecomes x+ıct[13], reminiscent of El Naschie’s complex time[14] and the Hawking-Hartle static time[15]. The compl ex coordinates or equivalently non-Hermitian position operators are symp tomatic of the unphysical zitterbewegung which is eliminated after an ave raging over the Compton scale. In this picture the ﬂuctuational creation of particles is taken into account in a consistent cosmological scheme[16]. It is well known that the generalization of complex xcoordinate to three dimensions leads to quarternions[17], and the Pauli spin me trics. We next come to a model of an electron as a Quantum Mechanical B lack Hole and widely discussed by the author (Cf. example[5, 6]). In this model an electron is a spinning shell (reminiscent of Dirac’s mode l[18]) of radius equalling the Compton wavelength, and equavalently a Kerr- Newman Black Hole. Within this Compton scale Black Hole we encounter the u nphysical 2zitterbewegung region of complex (or non-Hermitian) coord inates already al- luded to. Infact electromagnetism was deduced[5, 6, 7] in two ways. Th e ﬁrst was by considering an imaginary shift, xµ→xµ+ıaµ,(aµ∼Compton scale) (1) in a Quantum Mechanical context. This lead to ı¯h∂ ∂xµ→ı¯h∂ ∂xµ+¯h aµ(2) and the second term on the right side of (2) was shown to be the e lectromag- netic vector potential Aµ, Aµ= ¯h/aµ(3) The second was by taking into account the fact that at the Comp ton scale, it is the so called negative energy two spinors χof the Dirac bispinor that dominate where, χ→ −χ under reﬂections. This lead to the tensor density property, ∂ ∂xµto∂ ∂xµ−Γµν ν (4) the second term on the right side of (4) being identiﬁed with Aµ, Aµ= ¯hΓµν ν (5) It was pointed out that (5) is formally and mathematically id entical to Weyl’s original formulation[1], except that here it arises due to t he purely Quantum Mechanical spinorial behaviour whereas Weyl had put it by ha nd. Another early scheme for the uniﬁcation of gravitation and e lectromagnetism as referred to earlier was that put forward by Kaluza and Klei n[3] in which an extra dimension was introduced and taken to be curled up. T his idea has resurfaced in recent years in String Theory. We will ﬁrst show that the characterization of Aµin (3) is identical to a Kaluza Klein formulation. Then we will show that equations ( 4) and (5) really denote the fact that the geometry around an electron i s non-integrable. 3Finally we will show that infact both (2) or (3) and (4) or (5) a re the same formulations. We ﬁrst observe that the transformation (5) can be written as , xı→xı+αı5x5(6) where αı5in (6) will represent a small shift from the Minkowski metric gıj, andı, j= 1,2,3,4,5, x5being a ﬁfth coordinate introduced for purely math- ematical conversion. Owing to (6), we will have, gıjdxıdxj→gıjdxıdxj+ (gıjαj5)dxıdx5(7) In Kaluza’s formulation, Aµ∝gµ5 (8) Comparison of (6) and (7) with (1) and (3) shows that indeed th is is the case. That is, the formulation given in (1) and (2) could be th ought of as introducing a ﬁfth curled up dimension, as in the Kaluza-Kle in theory. To see why the Quantum Mechanical formulation (4) and (5) cor responds to Weyl’s theory, we start with the eﬀect of an inﬁnitesimal par allel displace- ment of a vector [Bergmann]. δaσ=−Γσ µνaµdxν(9) As is well known, (9) represents the extra eﬀect in displacem ents, due to the curvature of space - in a ﬂat space, the right side would vanis h. Considering partial derivatives with respect to the µthcoordinate, this would mean that, due to (9) ∂aσ ∂xµ→∂aσ ∂xµ−Γσ µνaν(10) The second term on the right side of (10) can be written as: −Γλ µνgν λaσ=−Γν µνaσ where we have utilized the property that in the above formula tion (Cf.refs.[5,6,7]), gµν=ηµν+hµν, 4ηµνbeing the Minkowski metric and hµνa small correction whose square is neglected. That in, (10) becomes, ∂ ∂xµ→∂ ∂xµ−Γν µν (11) The relation (11) is the same as the relation (4). We will next show the correspondence between (11) or (5) or (4 ) and (3) or (2). To see this simply we note that the geodesic equation is, ˙uµ≡duµ ds= Γµ νσuνuσ(12) We also use the fact that in the Quantum Mechanical Black Hole model referred to, we have [5] uµ=cforµ= 1,2 and3 , while, \|˙uµ\|=\|uµ\|mc2 ¯h So, from (12) we get, Γµ νµ=1 aν,\|aν\|=¯h mc This establishes the required identity. 3 Quantized Fractal Space time and Quan- tum Superstrings It was shown[9] that the quantized fractal space time referr ed to really leads to a non-commutative geometry, not surprisingly: [x, y] = 0(l2),[x, px] =ı¯h[1 +l2],[t, E] =ı¯h[1 +τ2],· · · (13) It was shown earlier[9] that these relations directly lead t o the Dirac equation: Quantized fractal space time or the above relation (13) are t he underpinning for Quantum Mechanical spin or the Quantum Mechanical Black Hole, that is ultimately equations like (2) or (3) and (4) or (5). 5It is also true that both the Kaluza Klein formulation and the non commu- tative geometry (13) hold in the theory of Quantum Superstri ngs. Infact we get from here a clue to the mysterious six extra curl ed up dimen- sions of Quantum Superstring Theory. For this we observe tha t (13) gives an additional contribution to the Heisenberg Uncertainity Principle and we can easily deduce ∆p˙∆x∼¯hl2 Remembering that at this Compton scale ∆p∼mc It follows that ∆x∼l3(14) asl∼10−11cmsfor the electron we recover from (14) the Planck Scale, as well as a rationale for the peculiar fact that the Planck Scal e is the cube of the electron Compton scale. More importantly, what (14) shows is, that at this level, the single dimension along the xaxis shows up as being three dimensional. That is there are tw o extra dimensions, in the unphysical region below the Compto n scale. As this is true for the yandzcoordinates also, there are a total of six curled up or unphysical or inaccessible dimensions in the context of the preceding section. 4 Discussion and Conclusion If we start with equations (1) to (3) which were related to QFS T (Quan- tized Fractal space time) and the non-commutative relation (13) we obtain a uniﬁcation of electromagnetism and gravitation. On the ot her hand if we consider the spinorial behaviour of the Dirac wave function , we get (4) or (5). The former has been seen to be the same as the Kaluza formulati on while the latter is formally similar to the Weyl formulation - but in th is case (5) is not put in by hand. Rather it is a Quantum Mechanical consequence . We have thus shown that these two approaches are the same. The extra d imensions are thus seen to be conﬁned to the unphysical Compton scale - c lassically speaking they are curled up or inaccessible. In a sense this is not surprising. The bridge between the two a pproaches was 6the Kerr-Newman metric which uses, though without a clear ph ysical mean- ing in classical theory, the transformation (1). The reason why an imaginary shift is associated with spin is to be found in the Quantum Mec hanical zit- terbewegung and the consequent QFST. Wheeler remarked [19], ”the most evident shortcoming of the geometrody- namic model as it stands is this, that it fails to supply any co mpletely natural place for spin 1 /2 in general and for the neutrino, in particular”, while ”it is impossible to accept any description of elementary parti cles that does not have a place for spin half.” Infact the bridge between the two is the transfor- mation (1). It introduces spin half into general relativity and curvature to the electron theory, via the equation (5) or (10). In this context it is interesting to note that El Naschie has g iven the fractal formulation of gravitation[20]. Thus apparently disparate concepts like the Kaluza Klein an d Weyl formu- lations, Quantum Mechanical Black Holes, quantized fracta l space time and QSS are seen to have a harmonius overlap, in the context of QFS T with its roots in the ﬂuctuational creation of particles[21]. References [1] Bergmann, P.G., ”Introduction to the Theory of Relativi ty”, Prentice- Hall (New Delhi), 1969, p162ﬀ, p.245ﬀ. [2] Einstein, A., ”The Meaning of Relativity”, Oxford & IBH, New Delhi, 1965, pp.93-94. [3] Kaluza, Th., ”On the uniﬁcation problem in Physics” in ”A n Introduc- tion to Kaluza-Klein Theories”, Ed., H.C. Lee, World Scient iﬁc, Singa- pore, 1984, p.1ﬀ. [4] Witten, W., Physics Today, April 1996, pp.24-30. [5] Sidharth, B.G., Ind. J. Pure and Applied Phys., 35 (7), 19 97, 456. [6] Sidharth, B.G., Int.J.Mod.Phys.A., 13(15), 1998, pp25 99-2612. [7] Sidharth, B.G., Gravitation & Cosmology, Vol.4, No.2 (1 4), 1998, pp.1- 5. 7[8] Newman, E.T., J. Math. Phys. 14, 1, pp.102ﬀ, 1973. [9] Sidharth, B.G., Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2000, 11(8) , 1269-1278. [10] Ne’eman, Y., in ”Proceedings of Frontiers of Fundament al Physics”, Eds.B.G. Sidharth and A. Burinskii, Universities Press, Hy derabad, 1998, p.83-96. [11] Abbott L.F., and Wise, M.B., AMJ Phys., (1981) 49 , 37-39. [12] Nottale, L., ”Fractal Space-Time and Microphysics, Wo rld Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1993, p.110-190. [13] Sidharth, B.G., ”Space Time as a Random Heap”, to appear in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. [14] El Naschie, M.S., On conjugate time and information in r elativistic quantum theory, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 1995, 5, 1551-1 555. [15] Prigogine, I., ”End of Unceertainity”, Free Press, New York, 1997, p.170. [16] Sidharth, B.G., ”Issues in Quantized Fractal Space Tim e”, to appear in Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. [17] Sachs, M., ”General Relativity and Matter” (1982), D. R eidel Publishing Company, Holland, p.45ﬀ. [18] Dirac, P.A.M., Proc.Roy.Soc (London) A268, 1962, p.57 . [19] Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., and Wheeler, J.A., ”Gravit ation”, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973, pp.448, 1200. [20] El Naschie, M.S., Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 8(11), 1997, p.1865-1872. [21] Sidharth, B.G., ”Fluctuation and Interaction”, to app ear in Chaos, Soli- tons & Fractals. 8
arXiv:physics/0007022v1 [physics.class-ph] 9 Jul 2000TAUP 2550-99 22 June, 2000 Classical Radiation Reaction Oﬀ-Shell Corrections to the Covariant Lorentz Force O. Oron and L.P. Horwitz* School of Physics and Astronomy Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel Abstract: It has been shown by Gupta and Padmanabhan that the radiation reaction force of the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation can be obtained by a coordi nate transformation from the inertial frame of an accelerating charged particle to that o f the laboratory. We show that the problem may be formulated in a ﬂat space of ﬁve dimensions , with ﬁve corresponding gauge ﬁelds in the framework of the classical version of a ful ly gauge covariant form of the Stueckelberg-Feynman-Schwinger covariant mechanics (the zero mode ﬁelds of the 0,1,2,3 components correspond to the Maxwell ﬁelds). Without addi tional constraints, the particles and ﬁelds are not conﬁned to their mass shells. We show that in the mass-shell limit, the generalized Lorentz force obtained by means of th e retarded Green’s functions for the ﬁve dimensional ﬁeld equations provides the classical A braham-Lorentz-Dirac radiation reaction terms (with renormalized mass and charge). We also obtain general coupled equations for the orbit and the oﬀ-shell dynamical mass duri ng the evolution. The theory does not admit radiation if the particle remains identicall y on-shell. The structure of the equations implies that mass-shell deviation is bounded whe n the external ﬁeld is removed. PACS: 41.60.-m, 03.50.De, 03.30.+p, 11.10.Ef * Also at Department of Physics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat G an 529000, Israel 1Gupta and Padmanabhan4have shown that the motion of a charged particle in an electromagnetic ﬁeld can be described in the inertial frame of the particle with a time varying non-trivial background metric. Using the general c ovariant form of the Maxwell equations and transforming back to the inertial frame of the laboratory, they obtained the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac radiation reaction term as a con sequence of this geometrical picture. This result demonstrates that the description of t he motion of a charged particle in acceleration must include the radiation terms of the Abra ham-Lorentz-Dirac equation5. Alternatively, one can develop the mechanics in a ﬂat space o f higher dimension, an approach that we shall take. We shall work with the manifestl y covariant mechanics of Stueckelberg6, which provides a description of dynamical systems under th e inﬂuence of forces (which may be represented in terms of potentials or ga uge ﬁelds) in a framework which is Lorentz covariant. This theory admits, on a classic al level, deviations from the particle’s mass shell during interaction, as in quantum ﬁel d theory. A similar approach was used by Mendon¸ ca and Oliveira e Silva7, who studied the motion of a relativistically kicked oscillator in the E,tplane using what they called a “super Hamiltonian.” One can, in fact derive the relativistic Lorentz force m¨xµ=Fµ ν˙xν(1) from such a Hamiltonian. Consider the Hamiltonian5,6(we takec= 1 henceforth) K=(pµ−eAµ(x))(pµ−eAµ(x)) 2M(2), wherex≡xµ. The Hamilton equations (generalized to the four-dimensio nal symplectic mechanics6) are dxµ dτ=∂K ∂pµ=pµ−eAµ(x) M dpµ dτ=−∂K ∂xµ=e∂Aλ(x) ∂xµpλ−eAλ(x) M,(3) whereτis the absolute (universal) invariant time parametrizing t he path of the particle in spacetime6. Computingdpµ dτfrom the ﬁrst of these, one ﬁnds Eq. (1). It moreover follows from the ﬁrst of Eqs.(3) that dxµ dτdxµ dτ=(pµ−eAµ(x))(pµ−eAµ(x)) M2; (4) this quantity is absolutely conserved, since Kdoes not depend explicitly on τ. It follows, since the square of the proper time ds2=−dxµdxµ, thatdsis proportional to dτ, inde- pendently of the acceleration of the particle. The numerato r of (4) is the mass-squared of the particle; we infer that this result is associated with th e restriction of the particle to a sharp mass shell. 2Taking into account full U(1) gauge invariance, the Stueckelberg-Schr¨ odinger equation6(including a compensation ﬁeld for the τ-derivative) is /parenleftbig i∂ ∂τ+e0a5/parenrightbig ψτ(x) =(pµ−e0aµ(x,τ))(pµ−e0aµ(x,τ)) 2Mψτ(x), (5) where the gauge ﬁelds may depend on τande0is a dimensionless coupling. The corre- sponding classical Hamiltonian then has the form K=(pµ−e0aµ(x,τ))(pµ−e0aµ(x,τ)) 2M−e0a5(x,τ). (6) The equations of motion for the ﬁeld variables are given (for both the classical and quantum theories) by8 λ∂αfβα(x,τ) =e0jβ(x,τ), (7) whereα, β= 0,1,2,3,5, the last corresponding to the τindex, andλ, of dimension ℓ−1, is a factor on the terms fαβfαβin the Lagrangian associated with (6) (including degrees of freedom of the ﬁelds), required by dimensionality, as we sha ll see below. The ﬁeld strengths are fαβ=∂αaβ−∂βaα, (8) and the current satisﬁes the conservation law8,10 ∂αjα(x,τ) = 0. (9) Writing out (9) explicitly ( j5≡ρ, the density of events in spacetime), ∂5ρ+∂µjµ= 0; (10) integrating over τon (−∞,∞), and assuming that j5(x,τ) vanishes8at\|τ\| → ∞ , one ﬁnds that ∂µJµ(x) = 0, where (for some dimensionless η) Jµ(x) =η/integraldisplay∞ −∞dτjµ(x,τ). (11) We identify this Jµ(x) with the Maxwell conserved current. In ref. 9, for example, this expression occurs with jµ(x,τ) = ˙xµ(τ)δ4(x−x(τ)), (12) andτis identiﬁed with the proper time of the particle (an identiﬁ cation which can be made for the motion of a free particle). Integrating the µ-components of Eq. (7) over τ(assumingfµ5(x,τ)→0 forτ→ ±∞ ), we obtain the Maxwell equations with the Maxwell charge e=e0/ηand the Maxwell ﬁelds given by Aµ(x) =λ/integraldisplay∞ −∞aµ(x,τ)dτ. (13) 3The Hamiltonian of Stueckelberg6and Mondon¸ ca and Oliveira e Silva8can be recovered in the limit of the zero mode of the ﬁelds aµ(x,τ) =/integraldisplay dsˆaµ(x,s)e−isτ. (14) In the zero mode limit, when the Fourier transform of the ﬁeld s have support only in the neighborhood ∆ sofs= 0, the vector potential takes on the form aµ(x,τ)∼∆sˆaµ(x,0) = (∆s/2πλ)Aµ(x), and we identify e= (∆s/2πλ)e0. The zero mode therefore emerges when the inverse correlation length of the ﬁeld satisﬁes the rela tionη∆s= 2πλ. We remark that in this limit, the ﬁfth equation obtained from (7) decou ples; the zero mode of the τderivative of aµ(x,τ) vanishes. If the parameter λis independent of the dynamical structure of the ﬁelds, then the eﬀective width of ˆ aµ(x,s), when it is well-deﬁned, aﬀects the value of the charge e, as well as the relation between the eﬀective Maxwell curren t and the microscopic current jµ.This eﬀect, occurring when a Maxwell type theory is a good approximation, can be understood as a classical analog of ch arge renormalization, where the eﬀective charge is a function of momentum transfer. Again, writing the Hamilton equations for the Hamiltonian ( 6), we ﬁnd the generalized Lorentz force10 M¨xµ=e0fµ ν˙xν+fµ 5=e0/parenleftbig fselfµ ν˙xν+fselfµ 5+fextµ ν˙xν+fextµ 5/parenrightbig .(15) Multiplying this equation by ˙ xµ, one obtains M˙xµ¨xµ=e0˙xµfµ 5=e0/parenleftbig ˙xµfselfµ 5+ ˙xµfextµ 5/parenrightbig ; (16) this equation therefore does not necessarily lead to the tri vial relation between dsanddτ discussed above in connection with Eq. (4). The fµ5term has the eﬀect of moving the particle oﬀ-shell. In the following we use the Green’s functions for (7) to calcu late the radiation reaction force directly, as, for example, in the derivation of Sokolo v and Ternov11. In the limit for which the particle stays on its mass shell during the interac tion, we show that this formula reduces to the known Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac formula9,12for the Maxwell self-interaction problem. We furthermore show that the deviation from mass sh ell is stable. We shall use the retarded Green’s function and treat divergences by reno rmalization of charge and the mass parameter M. Choosing the generalized Lorentz gauge ∂αaα= 0, Eq. (7) becomes λ∂α∂αaβ(x,τ) = (σ∂2 τ−∂2 t+▽2)aβ=−e0jβ(x,τ), (17) whereσ=±1 corresponds to the possible choices of metric for the symme try O(4,1) or O(3,2) of the homogeneous ﬁeld equations. The Green’s functions for Eq. (17) can be constructed from th e inverse Fourier trans- form G(x,τ) =1 (2π)5/integraldisplay d4kdκei(kµxµ+σκτ) kµkµ+σκ2. (18) 4Integrating this expression over all τgives the Green’s function for the standard Maxwell ﬁeld. Assuming that the radiation reaction acts causally in τ, we shall restrict our attention here to the τ-retarded Green’s function. In his calculation of the radia tion corrections to the Lorentz force, Dirac12used the diﬀerence between advanced and retarded Green’s functions in order to cancel the singularities that they con tain. One can, alternatively11, use the retarded Green’s function and “renormalize” the mas s in order to eliminate the singularity. In our analysis, we follow the latter procedur e. Theτ- retarded Green’s function is given by multiplying the prin cipal part of the integral (18) by θ(τ). Carrying out the integrations (on a complex contour in κ; we consider the case σ= +1 in the following), one ﬁnds (this Green’s function diﬀer s from that used in ref. 13, constructed on a complex contour in k0) G(x,τ) =2θ(τ) (2π)3  tan−1/parenleftbig√ −x2−τ2 τ/parenrightbig (−x2−τ2)3 2−τ x2(x2+τ2)x2+τ2<0; 1 21 (τ2+x2)3 2ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingleτ−√ τ2+x2 τ+√ τ2+x2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle−τ x2(τ2+x2)x2+τ2>0.(19) With the help of this Green’s function, the solutions of Eq. ( 17) for the self-ﬁelds can be written, aselfµ(x,τ) =e0 λ/integraldisplay d4x′dτ′G(x−x′,τ−τ′) ˙xµ(τ′)δ4(x′−x(τ′)) =e0 λ/integraldisplay dτ′˙xµ(τ′)G(x−x(τ′),τ−τ′) aself5(x,τ) =e0 λ/integraldisplay d4x′dτ′G(x−x′,τ−τ′)δ4(x′−x(τ′)) =e0 λ/integraldisplay dτ′G(x−x(τ′),τ−τ′)(20) where we have used (12) (along with j5(x,τ) =δ4(x−x(τ))). We have written this Green’s function as a scalar, acting in the same way on all ﬁve compone nts of the source jα; to assure that the resulting ﬁeld is in Lorentz gauge, however, it should be written as a ﬁve by ﬁve matrix, with the factor δα β−kαkβ/k2(k5=κ) included in the integrand. Since we are computing only the gauge invariant ﬁeld strengths her e, this extra term will not inﬂuence any of the results. From (8) and (15), it then follows that the generalized Loren tz force for the self-action (the force of the ﬁelds generated by the world line on a point xµ(τ) of the trajectory) is M¨xµ=e2 0 λ/integraldisplay dτ′( ˙xν(τ) ˙xν(τ′)∂µ−˙xν(τ)˙xµ(τ′)∂ν)G(x−x(τ′))\|x=x(τ) +e2 0 λ/integraldisplay dτ′(∂µ−˙xµ(τ′)∂τ)G(x−x(τ′))\|x=x(τ) +e0/parenleftbig fextµ ν˙xν+fextµ 5/parenrightbig(21) We deﬁneu≡(xµ(τ)−xµ(τ′))(xµ(τ)−xµ(τ′)), so that ∂µ= 2(xµ(τ)−xµ(τ′))∂ ∂u. (22) 5Eq. (21) then becomes M¨xµ= 2e2 0 λ/integraldisplay dτ′{˙xν(τ) ˙xν(τ′)(xµ(τ)−xµ(τ′)) −˙xν(τ) ˙xµ(τ′)(xν(τ)−xν(τ′))}∂ ∂uG(x−x(τ′),τ−τ′)\|x=x(τ)) +e2 0 λ/integraldisplay dτ′{2(xµ(τ)−xµ(τ′))∂ ∂u−˙xµ(τ′)∂τ}G(x−x(τ′),τ−τ′)\|x=x(τ)). +e0/parenleftbig fextµ ν˙xν+fextµ 5/parenrightbig(23) We now expand the integrands in Taylor series around the most singular point τ=τ′. In this neighborhood, keeping the lowest order terms in τ′′=τ−τ′, the variable ureduces tou∼=˙xµ˙xµτ′′2. We shall also use the following deﬁnition; ε≡1 + ˙xµ˙xµ, (24) a quantity that vanishes on the mass shell of the particle (as we have pointed out above). In this case the derivatives of (19) take the form ∂G ∂u∼=θ(τ′′)f1(ǫ) (2π)3τ′′5 ∂G ∂τ′′∼=θ(τ′′)f2(ǫ) (2π)3τ′′4+δ(τ′′)f3(ǫ) (2π)3τ′′3(25) where we have used the following deﬁnitions: ε<0: f1(ε) =3 tan−1(√−ε) (−ε)5 2−3 ε2(1−ε)+2 ε(1−ε)2 f2(ε) =3 tan−1(√−ε) (−ε)5 2−1 ε2−2−ε ε2(1−ε) f3(ε) =tan−1(√−ε) (−ε)3 2+1 ε(1−ε)(26a) ε>0: f1(ε) =3 2ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1+√ε 1−√ε/vextendsingle/vextendsingle (ε)5 2−3 ε2(1−ε)+2 ε(1−ε)2 f2(ε) =3 2ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1+√ε 1−√ε/vextendsingle/vextendsingle (ε)5 2−1 ε2−2−ε ε2(1−ε) f3(ε) =−1 2ln/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1+√ε 1−√ε/vextendsingle/vextendsingle (ε)3 2+1 ε(1−ε)(26b) 6For either sign of ε, whenε∼0, f1(ε)∼8 5+24 7ε, f2(ε)∼ −2 5−4 7ε, f3(ε)∼2 3+4 5ε(26c) One sees that the derivatives in (25) have no singularity in εatε= 0. From (8) and (20), we have fselfµ 5(x(τ),τ) = e/integraldisplay dτ′{2(xµ(τ)−xµ(τ′))∂ ∂u−˙xµ(τ′)∂τ}G(x−x(τ′),τ−τ′)\|x=x(τ),(27) We see (from (25)) that the main contributions to the integra ls come from small τ′′. We may therefore expand xµ(τ)−xµ(τ′) and ˙xµ(τ)−˙xµ(τ′) in (27) in power series in τ′′, and write the integrals formally with inﬁnite limits. Substituting (27) into (16), we obtain (note that xµand its derivatives are evaluated at the point τ, and are not subject to the τ′′integration), after integrating by parts using δ(τ′′) =∂ ∂τ′′θ(τ′′), M˙xν¨xν=2e2 0 λ(2π)3/integraldisplay∞ −∞dτ′′/braceleftbig(f1−f2−3f3) τ′′4˙xν˙xν−(1 2f1−f2−2f3) τ′′3˙xν¨xν +(1 6f1−1 2f2−1 2f3) τ′′2˙xν...xν/bracerightbig θ(τ′′) +e0˙xµfextµ 5.(28) The integrals are divergent at the lower bound τ′′= 0 imposed by the θ-function; we therefore take these integrals to a cut-oﬀ µ>0. Eq.(28) then becomes M 2˙ε=2e2 0 λ(2π)3/braceleftbig(f1−f2−3f3) 3µ3(ε−1)−(1 2f1−f2−2f3) 4µ2˙ε +(1 6f1−1 2f2−1 2f3) µ˙xν...xν/bracerightbig +e0˙xµfextµ 5.(29) Following a similar procedure, we obtain from (23) M¨xµ=2e2 0 λ(2π)3/braceleftbig −f1 4µ2((1−ε)¨xµ+1 2˙ε˙xµ) +f1 3µ( ˙xν...xν˙xµ+ (1−ε)...xµ) +(f1−f2−3f3) 3µ3˙xµ−(1 2f1−f2−2f3) 2µ2¨xµ+(1 6f1−1 2f2−1 2f3) µ...xµ/bracerightbig +e0/parenleftbig fextµ ν˙xν+fextµ 5/parenrightbig .(30) 7Using (29) to substitute for the coeﬃcient of the1 µ3term in (30) , we obtain (for ε/ne}ationslash= 1) M(ε)¨xµ=−1 2M(ε) (1−ε)˙ε˙xµ+2e2 0 λ(2π)3µF(ε)/braceleftbig...xµ+1 (1−ε)˙xν...xν˙xµ/bracerightbig +e0˙xµ˙xνfextν 5 1−ε+e0fextµ ν˙xν+e0fextµ 5,(31) where F(ε) =f1 3(1−ε) + (1 6f1−1 2f2−1 2f3). (32) Here, the coeﬃcients of ¨ xµhave been grouped into a renormalized (oﬀ-shell) mass term, deﬁned (as in the procedure of Sokolov and Ternov11) as M(ε) =M+e2 2µ/bracketleftbigf1(1−ε) 2+1 2f1−f2−2f3/bracketrightbig (33) where, as we shall see below, e2=2e2 0 λ(2π)3µ, (34) can be identiﬁed with the Maxwell charge by studying the on-s hell limit. We now obtain, from (31), M(ε)¨xµ=−1 2M(ε) 1−ε˙ε˙xµ+F(ε)e2/braceleftbig...xµ+1 1−ε˙xν...xν˙xµ/bracerightbig +e0fextµ ν˙xν+e0/parenleftBig˙xµ˙xν 1−ε+δµ ν/parenrightBig fextν 5.(35) We remark that when one multiplies this equation by ˙ xµ, it becomes an identity (all of the terms except for e0fextµ ν˙xνmay be grouped to be proportional to/parenleftBig ˙xµ˙xν 1−ε+δµ ν/parenrightBig ); one must use Eq. (29) to compute the oﬀ-shell mass shift εcorresponding to the longitudinal degree of freedom in the direction of the four velocity of the particle. Eq. (35) determines the motion orthogonal to the four velocity. Equations (29) a nd (35) are the fundamental dynamical equations governing the oﬀ-shell orbit. We now show that the standard relativistic Lorentz force, wi th radiation corrections, can be obtained from these equations when µ˙ε<<ε<< 1 and ¨εandfµ ext5are small. In this case, Eq. (29) becomes /parenleftbig M−1 15µ/parenrightbig˙ε 2∼=e2/braceleftBig −8ε 15µ2+2 15˙xν...xν/bracerightBig (36) The left hand side can be neglected if /bracketleftBig M/(e2 µ)/bracketrightBig (µ˙ε)<<ε. (37) 8We shall see below that we must have 0 .68e2/µ < M for stability of ε, but ife2/µis not too small, the inequality (37) is consistent with our ass umed inequalities, and it then follows that 4ε/µ2∼=˙xν...xν. (38) If, furthermore, ¨ εis small, then ˙xµ...xµ= ¨ε−¨xµ¨xµ∼=−¨xµ¨xµ, (39) the known expression associated with radiation. Since ε/µ2may be appreciable even if εis small, the inequalitites we have assumed can admit a signi ﬁcant contribution of this type. Under these conditions equation (34) becomes, Mren¨xµ=2 3e2{...xµ−¨xν¨xν˙xµ}+e0fextµ ν˙xν, (40) whereMren=M(ε)\|ε=0=M+e2/3µ. This result is of the form of the standard relativistic Loren tz force with radiation reaction.9,11,12,14 We now study the stability of the variations of the oﬀ-shell p arameterεwhen the external ﬁeld is removed. First, we construct an equation of motion for ε. We deﬁne the functions F1(ε) =1 3µ2(ε−1)(f1−f2−3f3) F2(ε) =1 4µ(1 2f1−f2−2f3) F3(ε) =1 6f1−1 2f2−1 2f3(41) so equation (29), in the absence of external ﬁelds, becomes: M 2˙ε=e2/braceleftbig F1(ε) +F2(ε) ˙ε+F3(ε) ˙xµ...xµ/bracerightbig . (42) Solving for the explicit xderivatives in (42) and diﬀerentiating with respect to τ, one obtains ˙xµ....xµ+ ¨xµ...xµ=1 F3/braceleftbig F′ 2˙ε2+ ¨ε/parenleftbigM 2e2+F2/parenrightbig −F′ 1˙ε/bracerightbig −F′ 3 F32/braceleftbig F2+M 2e2˙ε−F1/bracerightbig ˙ε≡H.(43) Together with ˙xµ....xµ+ 3¨xµ...xµ=1 2...ε one ﬁnds, from (43), ¨xµ...xµ=1 4...ε−1 2H(ε,˙ε,¨ε) (44) 9Multiplying Eq.(35) by ¨ xµ(with no external ﬁelds) and using (42) and (44), we obtain ...ε−A(ε)¨ε+B(ε) ˙ε2+C(ε) ˙ε−D(ε) = 0, (45) where A(ε) =2 F3/parenleftbigM 2e2+F2/parenrightbig +2M(ε) e2F(ε), B=2F′ 3 F2 3/parenleftbigM 2e2+F2/parenrightbig −2F′ 2 F3+2 1−ε1 F3/parenleftbigM 2e2+F2/parenrightbig −M(ε) e2F(ε)1 1−ε, C=4M(ε) e2F(ε)1 F3/parenleftbigM 2e2+F2/parenrightbig −2 F2 3F1F′ 3 −2F1 (1−ε)F3+2 F3F′ 1, D=4M(ε) e2F(ε)F1 F3.(46) We ﬁrst study the possibilty of having a solution of the form ε≡ε0, a constant. In this case ¨ε= 0 implies, ˙xµ...xµ=−¨xµ¨xµ. Since all the derivatives of εare zero we also ﬁnd from (44), ¨xµ...xµ= 0 . Multiplying eq.(35) by ¨ xµand substituting these last two results we get ¨xµ¨xµ= ˙xµ...xµ= 0 From (42) we ﬁnd then that ˙xµ...xµ=−F1 F3= 0. From (41) and (26 b), one sees that this equation can be satisﬁed only if ε= 0 (F1= 0) or ε= 1 (F3=∞). Since ˙ε= 0 we ﬁnd that ˙t2¨t2=\|˙x\|2\|¨x\|2cos2θ. Together with ¨ xµ¨xµ=¨t2−\|¨x2\|= 0 this implies ˙t2¨t2=\|˙x\|2¨t2cos2θ The solution ¨t=\|¨x\|= 0 implies ˙ xµ= const . The other solution ˙t2=\|˙x\|2cos2θimplies that\|˙x\|2(1−cos2θ) =ε−1; since the left hand side is positive, εcannot be zero, and the only possibility for a constant solution is then ε= 1, motion on the light cone. We shall show below that the trajectory cannot reach this bounday. The mass shell condition ε= 0, in the theoretical framework we have given here, implies that the particle motion must be with constant veloc ity, and that no radiation (¨xµ¨xµ= 0) is possible, i.e., in order to radiate, the particle must be oﬀ-shell. This res ult 10is also true in the presence of an external ﬁeld. In particula r, it follows from Eq. (29) that forε≡0, −2 15µ˙xµ...xµ≡2 15µ¨xµ¨xµ =e0˙xµfextµ 5.(47) From Eq.(15), however, it follows (in case ˙ ε= 0) that ˙xµfextµ 5=−˙xµfselfµ 5, so that the nonvanishing value of ¨ xµ¨xµcorresponds only to a self-acting ﬁeld fselfµ 5(driven by fextµ 5), and not to radiation. We now show that, in general, εis bounded when the external ﬁelds are turned oﬀ. For the case ε<0 the function F3is zero atε=−0.735. In this case eq.(42) becomes ˙ε(−0.735) =F1(−0.735) M 2e2+F2(−0.735). (48) If ˙ε >0 at this value of ε, thenεcannot cross this boundary. Since F1(−0.735) =.624 µ2, F2(−0.375) = −.259 µ, this condition implies that µ>0.68e2 M. SettingM,eequal to the electron mass (the lowest mass charged particle ) and charge one ﬁnds thatµ>10−23sec, a cut-oﬀ of reasonable size for a classical theory. We now show that ǫis bounded from above by unity. The full classical Hamiltoni an, obtained by adding the contribution of the ﬁelds to the expre ssion on the right hand side of (6), is a conserved quantity. In the absence of external ﬁe lds, all the ﬁeld quantities are related to the source particle through the Green’s function s. In the absence of external ﬁelds, as the particle motion approaches the light cone, the re are inﬁnite contributions arising from the ﬁelds evaluated on the particle trajectory . In this case, it follows from (4) that(pµ−e0aµ(x,τ))(pµ−e0aµ(x,τ)) 2M= 0. Thea5self-ﬁeld term is less singular than the fµνfµνandfµ5fµ5terms, which involve derivatives of the Green’s functions, as in (25), squared. As seen from (26 b), the most singular contribution arises from f12. Since the total Hamiltonian Kis conserved, the coeﬃcient of this singularity must vanish . The coeﬃcients involve just ˙ ε(and its square) and ¨ ε; one ﬁnds a simple nonlinear diﬀerential equation for which only ˙ ε= 0 can be a solution. It follows that the conservation law restricts the evolution of εto values less than unity, i.e.the particle trajectory cannot pass through the light cone. This bound manifests itself in the structure of the diﬀerent ial equation (45) for ε. In the limit that ε→1, the coeﬃcients A, B,C, D are all ﬁnite; however the behavior of the linearized solution depends on the derivates of these coeﬃc ients, and, in this limit, B′is singular, driving the solution away from the light cone. Numerical studies are under way to follow the motion of this h ighly nonlinear system both in the presence and absence of external ﬁelds. Acknowledgements: We wish to thank Y. Ashkenazy, J. Bekenstein, C. Piron and F. Rohrlich and S.L. Adler for helpful discussions, and Z. Schu ss and J. Schiﬀ for explaining 11some things about non-linear equations to us. One of us (L.H. ) also wishes to thank S.L. Adler for his hospitality at the Institute for Advanced Stud y where much of this work was done. References 1. G.M. Zaslavskii, M.Yu. Zakharov, R.Z. Sagdeev, D.A. Usik ov, and A.A. Chernikov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 91, 500 (1986) [Sov. Phys. JEPT 64, 294 (1986)]. 2. D.W. Longcope and R.N. Sudan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1500 (1987). 3. H. Karimabadi and V. Angelopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2342 (1989). 4. A. Gupta and T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D57,7241 (1998). An approach using non- locality has been proposed by B. Mashoon,Proc. VII Brazilia n School of Cosmology and Gravitation, Editions Fronti´ eres (1944); Phys. Lett. A145, 147 (1990); Phys. Rev.A47, 4498 (1993). We thank J. Beckenstein for bringing the latte r works to our attention. 5. Y. Ashkenazy and L.P. Horwitz, chao-dyn/9905013, submit ted. 6. E.C.G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 322 (1941); 14, 588 (1941); JR.P. Feyn- man, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367 (1948); R.P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 80, 440(1950); J.S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951);L.P. Horwitz and C. Piron, Helv. Phys. Acta 46, 316 (1973). 7. J.T. Mendon¸ ca and L. Oliveira e Silva, Phys. Rev E 55, 1217 (1997). 8. D. Saad, L.P. Horwitz and R.I. Arshansky, Found. of Phys. 19, 1125 (1989); M.C. Land, N. Shnerb and L.P. Horwitz, Jour. Math. Phys. 36, 3263 (1995); N. Shnerb and L.P. Horwitz, Phys. Rev A 48, 4068 (1993). We use a diﬀerent convention for the parameters here. 9. See, for example, J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics , 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York(1975); F. Rohrlich, Classical Charged Particles , Addison-Wesley, Reading, (1965); S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity , Wiley, N.Y. (1972). 10. M.C. Land and L.P. Horwitz, Found. Phys. Lett. 4, 61 (1991); M.C. Land, N. Shnerb and L.P. Horwitz, Jour. Math. Phys. 36, 3263 (1995). 11. For example, A.A. Sokolov and I.M. Ternov, Radiation from Relativistic Electrons , Amer. Inst. of Phys. Translation Series, New York (1986). 12. P.A.M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 167, 148(1938). 13. M.C. Land and L.P. Horwitz, Found. Phys. 21, 299 (1991). 14. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields 4th ed., (Pergamon Pr., Oxford, 1975). 15. A.O. Barut and Nuri Unal, Phys. Rev A40, 5404 (1989) found non-vanishing contri- butions of the type ˙ xν¨xνto the Lorentz-Dirac equation in the presence of spin. 12
arXiv:physics/0007023v1 [physics.atom-ph] 9 Jul 2000Version 1.00 Lamb shift of 3P and 4P states and the determination of α U. D. Jentschura1,∗, G. Soﬀ1and P. J. Mohr2,† 1Institut f¨ ur Theoretische Physik, TU Dresden, Mommsenstr aße 13, 01062 Dresden, Germany 2Atomic Physics Division, National Institute of Standards a nd Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland MD 20899-0001, USA Abstract The ﬁne structure interval of P states in hydrogenlike syste ms can be de- termined theoretically with high precision, because the en ergy levels of P states are only slightly inﬂuenced by the structure of the nu cleus. Therefore a measurement of the ﬁne structure may serve as an excellent t est of QED in bound systems or alternatively as a means of determining t he ﬁne struc- ture constant αwith very high precision. In this paper an improved analytic calculation of higher-order binding corrections to the one -loop self energy of 3P and 4P states in hydrogen-like systems with low nuclear ch arge number Zis presented. The method of calculation has been described e arlier [1] and is applied here to the excited P states. Because of the more co mplicated na- ture of the wave functions and the bound state poles correspo nding to decay of the excited states, the calculations are more complex. Co mparison of the analytic results to the extrapolated numerical data for hig hZions [2] serves as an independent test of the analytic evaluation. New theor etical values for the Lamb shift of the P states and for the ﬁne structure splitt ings are given. PACS numbers 12.20.Ds, 31.30Jv, 06.20 Jr Typeset using REVT EX ∗Electronic address: ulj@nist.gov. †Electronic address: mohr@nist.gov. 1I. INTRODUCTION Evaluations of the radiative corrections in higher order fo r bound states are an involved task because of the appearance of a multitude of terms, and be cause of the diﬃculties associated with bound state formalism. In this paper, we pre sent an improved calculation of higher order corrections to the one–loop self energy of an electron in an excited 3P or 4P state. For the contribution δESEof the one–loop radiative correction to the Lamb shift of a bound electron, we have the following non-analytic expansi on in powers of Ztimes the ﬁne structure constant α δESE=α π(Zα)4m n3F, (1) where F=A4,1ln(Zα)−2+A4,0+ (Zα)A5,0+ (Zα)2/bracketleftBig A6,2ln2(Zα)−2+A6,1ln(Zα)−2+A6,0+ (Zα)GSE,7/bracketrightBig . (2) The remainder function GSE,7is of order 1 and is comprised of the terms A7,0and higher coeﬃcients. Corrections A4,1,A5,0andA6,2vanish for P states. The terms A4,0(see, e.g., [3]) andA6,1[3,4] are known analytically. The term A4,0contains the Bethe logarithm which has been evaluated to 12 signiﬁcant ﬁgures [5,6]. Results ha ve not been obtained for A6,0 coeﬃcients. In this paper, we present an evaluation of the A6,0coeﬃcients for the 3P 1/2, 3P3/2, 4P1/2and 4P 3/2states. The results lead to improved values for the Lamb shif t of the respective states and to a new theoretical value for the ﬁne s tructure splitting. We give an explicit formula for the ﬁne structure of the 2P, 3P and 4P sta tes as a function of the ﬁne structure constant α, which can be used to obtain a value of αfrom experimental data. In this paper, we brieﬂy compare some of the methods that have been developed for the treatment of the one–loop problem. We give a brief account an d illustrate the usefulness of theǫ-method [1,7] for analytic evaluations. We then describe th e evaluation of the high– energy part to the self energy, with a focus on details of the i ntegration procedure. We then proceed to the low–energy part. Results of the calculation a re given, speciﬁc contributions are discussed in detail. II. VARIOUS METHODS OF TREATMENT OF THE ONE–LOOP SELF ENERGY Using units in which ¯ h=c= 1 ande2= 4πα, we can write the integral corresponding to the one–loop self energy of an electron bound in a Coulomb ﬁ eld, δESE= lim M→∞−ie2/integraldisplay CFdω 2π/integraldisplayd3k (2π)3Dreg µ,ν(k2,M)/angbracketleft¯ψ\|γµ 1 /negationslashp− /negationslashk−m−γ0Vγν\|ψ/angbracketright −/angbracketleft¯ψ\|δm(M)\|ψ/angbracketright, (3) whereDreg µ,ν(k2,M) is the Pauli-Villars regularized photon propagator (in Fe ynman gauge, we haveDreg µν(k2,M) =−gµν(1/k2−1/(k2−M2)). The term δm(M) in Eq. (3) is the one–loop 2mass counter term as a function of M,δm(M) =α(3/(4π))m(ln(M2/m2)+1/2).¯ψ=ψ†γ0 denotes the Dirac adjoint. It is straightforward to derive E q. (3) with the Feynman rules of QED. By rescaling all variables to the electron mass scale ω→mω′,k→mk′, p→mp′, V→mV′, M →mM′, (4) we have δESE=−ie2m/integraldisplay CFdω′ 2π/integraldisplayd3k′ (2π)3/bracketleftbigg1 k′2−1 k′2−M′2/bracketrightbigg /angbracketleft¯ψ\|γµ 1 /negationslashp′− /negationslashk′−1−γ0V′γµ\|ψ/angbracketright −/angbracketleft¯ψ\|δm(M′)\|ψ/angbracketright. (5) We will use variables rescaled to the electron mass in this pa per, and suppress the prime of the rescaled variables in the sequel. Note that in our system of units, we have (e. g.) for the Bohr radius of the atom aBohr= 1/(Zα). By contrast, in atomic units, which are used for example in [8], we would have the Bohr radius of length unity. The analytic properties of the propagators determine the lo cation of the poles in the integrand in Eq. (3) as indicated in Fig. 1. The original Feyn man prescription calls for integrating the photon energy along the contour CF. For the actual evaluation of the Lamb shift, however, a diﬀerent contour of integration is used by most authors. Taking advantage of the analytic properties of the integrand and of Jordan’s lem ma, one can change the Feynman contour in the complex plane without changing the result of t he calculation. We compare here the contour used in Bethe’s original derivation of the L amb shift, the contour used by Mohr in [9–12], and the contour used in Pachucki’s ǫmethod, which is used in this paper. Mohr’s and Pachucki’s methods both depend on a division of th e calculation into a low and a high–energy part. Mohr’s method relies on the contour CMin Fig. 2. His low–energy part is determined by the part of the contour CMwhere Re(ω)< ǫ. The residues of the poles of the photon propagator only contribute to low–energ y part in this case. It can be shown that the low–energy part is given by the formula ∆EL= lim δ→0+/bracketleftBiggα πEn−α 4π2/integraldisplay k<E nd3k1 k/parenleftBigg δi,j−kikj k2/parenrightBigg ×/angbracketleftψ\|αieik·r 1 HD−En−k−iδαje−ik·r\|ψ/angbracketright/bracketrightBigg . (6) (cf. Eq. (3.8) in [9], HDis the Dirac Hamiltonian). This contribution contains term s of lower order in (Zα) than (Zα)4. The spurious lower order terms cancel when the low and the hi gh– energy parts are added in that method. The high–energy part i s obtained by Wick-rotating the Feynman contour for ωintegration along the line with Re( ω) =En. In the non-relativistic limit, expression (6) corresponds (up to the term α/πEn) to what would be expected to be the self energy of the electron in terms of traditional secon d order perturbation theory due to transverse modes of the electromagnetic ﬁeld, ∆E(2) L= Re(∆EL)−α πEn =/summationdisplay n′/integraldisplay P/integraldisplay k<Kd3k/summationdisplay λ=1,2e2 4m2/integraldisplay d3r\|ψ† n′(x)/bracketleftBig ∇·ǫλ(k)eik·r+eik·r∇·ǫλ(k)/bracketrightBig ψn′(x)\|2 En−En′−k,(7) 3where /summationdisplay λ=1,2ǫi λ(k)ǫj λ(k) =δij−kikj k2. (8) Kin Eq. (7) is an appropriate energy cutoﬀ to make the expressi on ﬁnite (for a derivation of Eq. (7) cf. [13], Eq. (7-112) to Eq. (7-115) ibid., where in the relativistic case one has to substitute αfor 1/i∇). In Mohr’s method, Kcorresponds to En. Bethe’s derivation of the Lamb shift, which gave the right scaling of the eﬀect of th e self energy and correctly identiﬁedA4,1, but did not include the contribution to the Lamb shift of ord erα/π(Zα)4 due to the anomalous magnetic moment, comprised the express ion given in Eq. (7), but with a major modiﬁcation. Bethe subtracted from (7) the cont ribution that would modify the energy (or mass) of a free electron due to its self interac tion. This contribution would give a contribution to the rest mass of any electron, and thus would be unobservable. In our terminology, Bethe’s non-relativistic (NR) expression wo uld be written δE2,NR L=−P2α 3π/integraldisplayK=m 0dkk/angbracketleftφ\|pi m/bracketleftBigg1 HS−(Eφ−k)−1 k/bracketrightBiggpi m\|φ/angbracketright, (9) whereHSis the Schr¨ odinger Hamiltonian, φis the non-relativistic wave function, and the subtracted term −1/kin the integrand corresponds to the portion of mass renormal ization attributable to the low–energy part. By taking the principa l value (P), we identify the real part of Eq. (9) as the energy shift, whereas the imaginary par t corresponds to the decay width of the state \|φ/angbracketright. Using the subtraction, Bethe disposed of the spurious lowe r-order terms and obtained a ﬁnite expression. In Pachucki’s method (see Fig. 3), an expression similar to E q. (7) is obtained in the non-relativistic limit for the low–energy part, but with an upper cutoﬀ epsilon for the pho- ton energy. This cutoﬀ epsilon separates the low and the high –energy parts. In the dipole approximation exp( ik·r)→1, one obtains the expression δEL=−2α 3π/integraldisplayǫ 0dkk/angbracketleftφ\|pi m1 HS−(Eφ−k)pi m\|φ/angbracketright (10) for the low-energy part in leading order. The renormalizati on term −1/kis gone, and the upper cutoﬀ has been changed from K=mtoK=ǫ. The justiﬁcation for leaving out the renormalization term is intimately linked to the special se ries expansion prescription used by Pachucki. Pachucki’s method relies on the fact that the low–energy par t and the high–energy part may formally be regarded as functions of the ﬁne structure co nstantαand the cutoﬀ pa- rameterǫ. Their sum, however, the self energy of the electron δE, δE(α) =EL(α,ǫ) +EH(α,ǫ), (11) does not depend on epsilon, provided the high and the low–ene rgy parts are expanded ﬁrst inα, and then in epsilon (the order of expansion plays a crucial r ole in that case). Another important point in Pachucki’s method is that the spu rious lower order terms which were present in Mohr’s calculation vanish in the limit ǫ→0, so we do not need to 4take them into account. For example, in Mohr’s calculation, the ﬁrst spurious term ( α/π)En originated from a trivial integration/integraltextEn 0dkα/π = (α/π)En. In Pachucki’s method, we would change the upper limit of integration to ǫand calculate lim ǫ→0/integraltextǫ 0dkα/π = 0. That means by choosing the ǫprescription, we not only make the expression for the low–en ergy part separately ﬁnite, but also dispose of the spurious lower ord er terms. That is the principal reason why Pachucki’s method is well suited for the analytic calculation of higher order corrections to the one–loop self energy. The choice of epsilon remains arbitrary to a certain extent ( it has to be because we ana- lytically expand in ǫand thus require arbitrariness). However, we must put some r estraints on the magnitude of ǫ. In the high–energy part, we expand the propagator of the bou nd electron in powers of the binding ﬁeld V. We initially assume a ﬁxed value for ǫwhich pre- vents infrared problems, but since eventually ǫ→0, this expansion is regarded as a formal expansion that is not necessarily convergent. However, ǫmay not be arbitrarily large. If we letǫ>2m, we enclose poles not only from the photon propagator, but al so from the negative spectrum of the Dirac-Coulomb propagator, which would sign iﬁcantly alter our expression for the low–energy part. It is also required that in the entir e domain of the low–energy part, an expansion of the expression exp(ik·r) in the matrix element /angbracketleftψ\|αieik·r 1 HD−En−k−iδαje−ik·r\|ψ/angbracketright in powers of k·rcorresponds to an expansion in powers of Zα(this requirement justiﬁes the so-called dipole approximation, in which we replace exp (ik·r) by unity to obtain the lowest order contribution to the self energy). The order of m agnitude of ris 1/(Zα) in natural units. Thus we require ǫ<(Zα). The dominant contribution is then determined by the region in which the photon energy k≡ω=O((Zα)2), so that k·r=O(Zα). In this paper we consider the relativistic corrections up to relati ve order (Zα)2. This corresponds to expanding exp( ik·r) up to ( k·r)2. Our restrictions on the magnitude of ǫdo not compromise the validity of analytic expansion in the parameter ǫ. III. THE HIGH-ENERGY PART The high–energy part of the radiative correction is given by EH=−ie2m/integraldisplay CHdω 2π/integraldisplayd3k (2π)3/bracketleftbigg1 k2−1 k2−M2/bracketrightbigg /angbracketleft¯ψ\|γµ 1 /negationslashp− /negationslashk−1−γ0Vγµ\|ψ/angbracketright −/angbracketleft¯ψ\|δm(M)\|ψ/angbracketright, (12) where we have used the Feynman gauge for the photon propagato r (Dµν(k) =−gµν/k2) and the Pauli-Villars regularization prescription 1 k2+iδ→1 k2+iδ−1 k2−M2+iδ, (13) 5Note that we may leave out iǫprescription when integrating along CHsince we take the diﬀerence of the integrand inﬁnitesimally above and below t he real axis on CH. Along the positive real axis, the integrand has branch cuts due to the p hoton and electron propagators as depicted in Fig. 1. The expression given in Eq. (12) for EHis infrared divergent. In the evaluation, we start by calculating the matrix element ˜P=/angbracketleft¯ψ\|γµ 1 /negationslashp− /negationslashk−m−γ0Vγµ\|ψ/angbracketright (14) up to the order of ( Zα)6. As outlined in [1], this can be achieved by ﬁrst expanding th e electron propagator in powers of the binding Coulomb ﬁeld V. This leads to a 3-vertex, a double-vertex, a single-vertex and a zero-vertex part. The expansion can be diagrammatically represented as in Fig. 4. The resulting expressions are subs equently expanded in powers of the spatial electron momenta pi. This procedure is feasible for P states because up to order ( Zα)6, all of the resulting matrix elements converge. After perfor ming the algebra of the Dirac matrices, the resulting matrix elements on the P state are ev aluated by symbolic procedures written in the computer algebra system Mathematica [14]. For the evaluation, we ﬁrst expand the wave function (given by the exact solution to the D irac-Coulomb equation) in powers of ( Zα), then we apply operators in coordinate space representati on and ﬁnally integrate the resulting expressions with the help of a set of rules that apply to standard integrals. The integrands which are to be evaluated for the m atrix elements have lengths of up to 2,000 terms. We use a parametric representation of the mass counter term t o allow for local cancella- tion of the divergences. It can be shown that δm(M) =−ie2m/integraldisplay CHdω 2π/integraldisplayd3k (2π)3/bracketleftbigg1 ω2−k2−1 ω2−k2−M2/bracketrightbigg2(ω+ 1) ω2−k2−2ω(15) is a suitable parametric representation of the mass counter term along the contour CH. The portion of mass renormalization along the contour CLvanishes in the limit ǫ→0, and we have δm(M) =−ie2m/integraldisplay CFdω 2π/integraldisplayd3k (2π)3/bracketleftbigg1 k2+iǫ−1 k2−M2+iǫ/bracketrightbigg2(ω+ 1) ω2−k2−2ω =α3m 4π/bracketleftBig ln/parenleftBig M2/parenrightBig + 1/2/bracketrightBig . (16) Therefore, by (locally) subtracting the expression δml=2(ω+ 1) ω2−k2−2ω/angbracketleft¯ψ\|ψ/angbracketright before the ﬁnal dωd3k[1/(ω2−k2)−1/(ω2−k2−M2)]-integration in Eq. (12), we can subtract the divergences associated with mass renormaliza tion. Note thatδmlcontains the matrix element /angbracketleft¯ψ\|ψ/angbracketright, which is state dependent. Using the virial theorem for the Dirac-Coulomb equation ( /angbracketleftα·p/angbracketright=−/angbracketleftV/angbracketright), we have /angbracketleft¯ψ\|ψ/angbracketright=Eψ, whereEψis the dimensionless Dirac energy of the state ψ. We give here the result for the renormalized matrix element 6˜Pren=˜P−δml (17) up to (Zα)6in terms of kandω. We have for the 3 P1/2state, ˜Pren(3P1/2) = (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −8k2+ 4k4+ 6k2ω−3k4ω+ 12ω2−10k2ω2 −6ω3+ 6k2ω3+ 6ω4−3ω5/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 27/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg3/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)4/bracketleftbigg −128k4+ 48k6+ 24k8+ 96k4ω+ 2k6ω−9k8ω +256k2ω2−156k4ω2−90k6ω2−168k2ω3+ 46k4ω3 +36k6ω3−16ω4+ 240k2ω4+ 126k4ω4+ 72ω5 −98k2ω5−54k4ω5−132ω6−78k2ω6+ 50ω7+ 36k2ω7 +18ω8−9ω9/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 324/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg5/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)6/bracketleftbigg −1044992 k6+ 516224 k8+ 319032 k10+ 32340 k12 +587776 k4ω+ 1716736 k6ω+ 26320 k8ω−65310k10ω−8085k12ω −358400 k2ω2+ 4218368 k4ω2−3461600 k6ω2−1372476 k8ω2 −177870 k10ω2+ 1469440 k2ω3−9185344 k4ω3+ 1027600 k6ω3 +357630 k8ω3+ 48510 k10ω3+ 1075200ω4−9354240 k2ω4 +10195136 k4ω4+ 2348976 k6ω4+ 404250 k8ω4−3978240ω5 +15638560 k2ω5−3365600 k4ω5−777420 k6ω5−121275 k8ω5 +7869120ω6−12272960 k2ω6−2002392 k4ω6−485100 k6ω6 −8571360ω7+ 3543120 k2ω7+ 839580 k4ω7+ 161700 k6ω7 +5023200ω8+ 852600 k2ω8+ 323400 k4ω8−1231440ω9 −450870 k2ω9−121275 k4ω9−145740ω10−113190 k2ω10 +96390ω11+ 48510 k2ω11+ 16170ω12−8085ω13/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg /bracketleftbigg 612360/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg7/bracketrightbigg (18) for the 3P3/2state, ˜Pren(3P3/2) = (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −8k2+ 4k4+ 6k2ω−3k4ω+ 12ω2−10k2ω2 −6ω3+ 6k2ω3+ 6ω4−3ω5/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 27/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg3/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)4/bracketleftbigg −128k4+ 32k6+ 8k8+ 32k4ω−26k6ω−3k8ω +192k2ω2−68k4ω2−30k6ω2−56k2ω3+ 42k4ω3 +12k6ω3−112ω4+ 42k4ω4+ 24ω5−6k2ω5−18k4ω5 +36ω6−26k2ω6−10ω7+ 12k2ω7+ 6ω8−3ω9/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg 7/bracketleftbigg 324/bracketleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg5/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)6/bracketleftbigg −4179968 k6+ 516608 k8+ 224616 k10+ 12180 k12 +2351104 k4ω+ 243712 k6ω−1022336 k8ω−103110 k10ω −3045k12ω−1433600 k2ω2+ 8960000 k4ω2+ 667456 k6ω2 −539868 k8ω2−66990k10ω2+ 4157440 k2ω3−2845696 k4ω3 +1703632 k6ω3+ 370230 k8ω3+ 18270 k10ω3+ 4300800ω4 −17297280 k2ω4−3980704 k4ω4+ 135408 k6ω4+ 152250 k8ω4 −10752000ω5+ 10612000 k2ω5−619136 k4ω5−449820 k6ω5 −45675k8ω5+ 15408960 ω6−99680k2ω6+ 586824 k4ω6 −182700 k6ω6−10647840ω7+ 216720 k2ω7+ 159180 k4ω7 +60900 k6ω7+ 2896320ω8−543480 k2ω8+ 121800 k4ω8 −278880ω9+ 65730 k2ω9−45675k4ω9+ 136500ω10 −42630k2ω10−42210ω11+ 18270 k2ω11+ 6090ω12 −3045ω13/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 2449440/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg7/bracketrightbigg (19) for the 4P1/2state, ˜Pren(4P1/2) = (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −8k2+ 4k4+ 6k2ω−3k4ω+ 12ω2−10k2ω2 −6ω3+ 6k2ω3+ 6ω4−3ω5/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 48/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg3/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)4/bracketleftbigg −2944k4+ 1072 k6+ 520k8+ 2080 k4ω−10k6ω −195k8ω+ 5760 k2ω2−3412k4ω2−1950k6ω2−3640k2ω3 +1050 k4ω3+ 780k6ω3−560ω4+ 5040 k2ω4+ 2730 k4ω4 +1560ω5−2070k2ω5−1170k4ω5−2700ω6−1690k2ω6 +1030ω7+ 780k2ω7+ 390ω8−195ω9/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg /bracketleftbigg 15360/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg5/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)6/bracketleftbigg −41518080 k6+ 20285056 k8+ 12019560 k10 +1140300 k12+ 21790720 k4ω+ 67517184 k6ω−1295056 k8ω −2875250 k10ω−285075 k12ω−13189120 k2ω2+ 164921344 k4ω2 −138538016 k6ω2−50829380 k8ω2−6271650 k10ω2 +53975040 k2ω3−357889728 k4ω3+ 50610672 k6ω3 +14327250 k8ω3+ 1710450 k10ω3+ 39567360 ω4−357683200 k2ω4 +404953920 k4ω4+ 81291280 k6ω4+ 14253750 k8ω4 −147302400ω5+ 601024480 k2ω5−153435296 k4ω5 −28556500 k6ω5−4276125 k8ω5+ 294387520 ω6−485016000 k2ω6 8−59093160 k4ω6−17104500 k6ω6−325403680ω7+ 160218800 k2ω7 +28458500 k4ω7+ 5701500 k6ω7+ 198315040 ω8+ 17532200 k2ω8 +11403000 k4ω8−56099120ω9−14180250 k2ω9−4276125 k4ω9 −920500ω10−3991050 k2ω10+ 2826250ω11+ 1710450 k2ω11 +570150ω12−285075ω13/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 51609600/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg7/bracketrightbigg (20) and for the 4 P3/2state ˜Pren(4P3/2) = (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −8k2+ 4k4+ 6k2ω−3k4ω+ 12ω2−10k2ω2 −6ω3+ 6k2ω3+ 6ω4−3ω5/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 48/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg3/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)4/bracketleftbigg −2944k4+ 752k6+ 200k8+ 800k4ω−570k6ω −75k8ω+ 4480 k2ω2−1652k4ω2−750k6ω2−1400k2ω3 +970k4ω3+ 300k6ω3−2480ω4+ 240k2ω4+ 1050 k4ω4 +600ω5−230k2ω5−450k4ω5+ 660ω6−650k2ω6 −170ω7+ 300k2ω7+ 150ω8−75ω9/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg /bracketleftbigg 15360/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg5/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)6/bracketleftbigg −41518080 k6+ 5273472 k8+ 2372328 k10+ 132300 k12 +21790720 k4ω+ 3438848 k6ω−10087504 k8ω−1069810 k10ω −33075k12ω−13189120 k2ω2+ 88747008 k4ω2+ 4454624 k6ω2 −5916484 k8ω2−727650 k10ω2+ 37847040 k2ω3−29007552 k4ω3 +18082288 k6ω3+ 3870930 k8ω3+ 198450 k10ω3+ 39567360 ω4 −163681280 k2ω4−34772416 k4ω4+ 2115344 k6ω4 +1653750 k8ω4−98918400ω5+ 100285920 k2ω5−8639904 k4ω5 −4785620 k6ω5−496125 k8ω5+ 143286080 ω6−1740480 k2ω6 +5429592 k4ω6−1984500 k6ω6−99145760ω7+ 3382960 k2ω7 +1829380 k4ω7+ 661500 k6ω7+ 26784800 ω8−5400920 k2ω8 +1323000 k4ω8−2737840ω9+ 563430 k2ω9−496125 k4ω9 +1400140ω10−463050 k2ω10−408310ω11+ 198450 k2ω11 +66150ω12−33075ω13/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 51609600/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg7/bracketrightbigg (21) Having calculated ˜P, we ﬁnally integrate along CHto obtain the result for EH, EH=−ie2m/integraldisplay CHdω 2π/integraldisplayd3k (2π)3/bracketleftbigg1 ω2−k2−1 ω2−k2−M2/bracketrightbigg ˜Pren. (22) Note that as ˜Pren=˜P−δml, both ˜Pas well as the local mass renormalization term δmlare properly integrated with the regularized photon propagato r. 9The ﬁnal integrations with respect to the photon momenta are done in a diﬀerent way for the terms in ˜Prenwhich require regularization and those which do not. The ter ms which require regularization are integrated covariantly by Feyn man parameter techniques and a subsequent Wick rotation. These terms are not integrated al ongCH, but rather along C′ H. They are not infrared divergent, so we may put ǫ= 0 for these terms. Those terms which do not require regularization are integrated in an essentia lly non-covariant way. The d3k integration is carried out ﬁrst, then we proceed to the dωintegration. The integration procedure for the terms which require regul arization is as follows. We isolate in ( ˜P−δml) those terms which would be ultraviolet divergent if integr ated with the unregularized photon propagator. We denote these terms by ˜Pdiv ren. We then evaluate δEdiv=/integraldisplay CHdω 2π/integraldisplayd3k (2π)31 ω2−k2/bracketleftBig˜Pdiv ren/bracketrightBig . All terms in ˜Pdiv renrequire regularization. By simple power counting arguments, it can be shown that ˜Pdiv renis exactly the sum of those terms of order knwheren≥ −2 for largek. Therefore, the terms contributing to ˜Pdiv ren can easily be isolated. The terms in ˜Pdiv, can obviously be written as the sum of terms of the form ˜Pdiv=/summationdisplay ipi(\|k\|,ω) [k2+ 2ω−ω2]ni(23) wherepiis a polynomial in \|k\|andωand deg(pi)≥ni−2. The entirely covariant integration procedure for the divergent terms will be outlined here. The terms in Eq. (23) need to be multiplied by the factors 1 /(ω2−k2) and 1/(ω2−k2−M2) from the regularized photon propagator. We use Feynman parameters in the form 1 ABn=/integraldisplay1 0dxnxn−1 [A(1−x) +Bx]n (24) to join the denominators. Identifying A1=−ω2+k2,A2=−ω2+k2+M2andB= k2+ 2ω−ω2, we have for the contribution from the unrenormalized photo n propagator 1/(ω2−k2), A1(1−x) +Bx=−˜k2+D1 (25) where ˜k= (˜ω,k) = (ω−x,k) andD1=x2, (26) and for the contribution from the renormalization part of th e photon propagator A(1−x) +Bx=−˜k2+D2 (27) where D2=x2+M(1−x). (28) 10The energy shift due to the divergent terms is then proportio nal to /summationdisplay i/integraldisplay1 0dx/integraldisplay d˜ωd3knixni−1pi(\|k\|,˜ω) −˜k2+D, whereDrepresents either of the terms D1orD2and it is understood that the contribution from these two terms must be subtracted to obtain the ﬁnal res ult. Performing the Wick rotation ˜ω→iω, we have −˜k2=ω2+k2=k2 e+D, wherekeis the Euclidean 4-vector ke= (ω,k). We then obtain the energy shift due to the divergent terms proportional to /summationdisplay i/integraldisplay1 0dx/integraldisplay d4kenixni−1pi(\|k\|,ω) k2e+D. The (straightforward) angular part of these integrals can b e done by parametrizing the Euclidean 4-space as ω=kecosγ,k1=kesinγsinθcosφ,k2=kesinγsinθsinφ, k3=kesinγcosθ. We then have ω=kecosγ,\|k\|=kesinγ. For the average over the 4-dimensional angle, we utilize the formulae /integraldisplaydΩ(4) e 2π2cos2γ=1 4,/integraldisplaydΩ(4) e 2π2cos4γ=1 8,/integraldisplaydΩ(4) e 2π2cos6γ=5 64. The remaining radial part of the integrals can be evaluated w ith the help of the formulae /integraldisplay∞ 0dkek3 e1 (k2e+D)β=1 2Dβ−2(β−1) (β−2)(β >2) and /integraldisplayΛ 0dkek3 e1 (k2e+D)2=1 2ln/parenleftbiggΛ D/parenrightbigg +O/parenleftbigg1 Λ/parenrightbigg2 . It is easy to prove that the dependence on the temporary upper cutoﬀ Λ disappears when the contribution due to the unregularized and the regularizati on part of the photon propagator are subtracted ( D1andD2). As the ﬁnal step, we integrate over the parameter xintroduced in Eq. (24) and subse- quently investigate the resulting expression in the limit M→ ∞. The respective expressions vanish asM→ ∞ for all states considered in this paper. This fact is intimat ely linked to our using the entirely covariant Feynman parameter appro ach for the integration of the divergent terms. If we had used a non-covariant scheme of int egration, as in [7], then we would have had to take into account ﬁnite correction terms to obtain the correct result for the Lamb shift. 11Note that the (divergent) spurious terms of order ( Zα)2, which are present in all of the matrix elements ˜Pren, vanish after we have performed the d4kintegration in the way outlined above, which includes ﬁnal expansion in the ǫparameter. The terms in ˜Pﬁn renwhich are ﬁnite when integrated with the unrenormalized pho ton propagator, do not need regularization. It is easy to see tha t˜Pﬁn rencan be written as the sum of terms of the form ˜Pﬁn ren=/summationdisplay jqj(\|k\|,ω) [k2+ 2ω−ω2]nj, (29) whereqjis a polynomial in \|k\|andωwhose degree is less than 2 nj−2 to insure ultraviolet convergence. For the 4 P1/2state, e. g., ˜Pﬁn renis given by Pﬁn ren= (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −4k2+ 3k2ω+ 6ω2−3ω3/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 24/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg3/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)4/bracketleftbigg −1472k4+ 536k6+ 1040 k4ω−5k6ω+ 2880 k2ω2 −1706k4ω2−1820k2ω3+ 525k4ω3−280ω4+ 2520 k2ω4 +780ω5−1035k2ω5−1350ω6+ 515ω7/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg /bracketleftbigg 7680/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg5/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)6/bracketleftbigg −20759040 k6+ 10142528 k8+ 6009780 k10 +10895360 k4ω+ 33758592 k6ω−647528 k8ω−1437625 k10ω −6594560 k2ω2+ 82460672 k4ω2−69269008 k6ω2−25414690 k8ω2 +26987520 k2ω3−178944864 k4ω3+ 25305336 k6ω3 +7163625 k8ω3+ 19783680 ω4−178841600 k2ω4+ 202476960 k4ω4 +40645640 k6ω4−73651200ω5+ 300512240 k2ω5−76717648 k4ω5 −14278250 k6ω5+ 147193760 ω6−242508000 k2ω6−29546580 k4ω6 −162701840ω7+ 80109400 k2ω7+ 14229250 k4ω7+ 99157520 ω8 +8766100 k2ω8−28049560ω9−7090125 k2ω9−460250ω10 +1413125ω11/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 25804800/parenleftbigg k2+ 2ω−ω2/parenrightbigg7/bracketrightbigg (30) We have to calculate δEH=−ie2m/integraldisplay CHdω 2π/integraldisplayd3k (2π)31 ω2−k2/bracketleftBig˜Pﬁn ren/bracketrightBig . The quantity FHdeﬁned by EH=α πm(Zα)4 n3FH (31) in Eq. (2) may be expressed as 12FH=n3/(Zα)4/integraldisplay CHdωF(ω) (32) where F(ω) =1 2πi/integraldisplay d\|k\|k2 ω2−k2˜Pﬁn ren(ω,\|k\|). One can dispose of the factors k2in the numerator of the integrand using the following procedure. First write k2as k2=Y−2ω+ω2, soY=k2+ 2ω−ω2corresponds to the denominator in Eq. (29). The resulting ex pression is subsequently expanded. The powers of Ycancel, and the result does not carry powers of kin the numerator any more. The integrand in F(ω) can be written as the sum of terms of the form F(ω) =1 2πi/integraldisplay d\|k\| /summationdisplay jajωnj ω2−k21 (k2+ 2ω−ω2)mj  (33) with suitable coeﬃcients aj. Thed\|k\|integration can then be carried out using the formula 1 2πi/integraldisplay∞ −∞d\|k\|1 ω2−k21 k2+ Ω =−1 2 sgn(Im(ω)) (ω2+ Ω)ω+(−1)n−1 (n−1)!∂n−1 ∂Ωn−1/bracketleftBiggi 2√ Ω1 ω2+ Ω/bracketrightBigg (34) where sgn is the sign function deﬁned as sgn(x) =/braceleftBigg 1x≥0 −1x<0(35) We identify Ω = 2ω−ω2(36) in order to carry out the integration in Eq. (33). The formula Eq. (34) deserves some com- ments. We are integrating along the real axis. Because ωand Ω both have an inﬁnitesimal imaginary part all along the contour of integration CH, the positions of the poles of the integrand are well deﬁned. The branch cuts of the function F(ω) can be readily identiﬁed. Due to the term sgn(Im(ω))ωin the ﬁrst term on the right hand side in (34), there is a branc h cut along the positive real axis. This branch cut is caused by the photo n propagator. Due to the term√ Ω in the second term on the right hand side in (34) there is also a branch cut along the line where the expression Ω = 2 ω−ω2assumes negative real values. This branch cut ex- tends from ω= 2 along the positive real axis to ω=∞. It is caused by the Dirac-Coulomb propagator (see Fig. 1). It can be explicitly checked that the function F(ω) satisﬁes the equation 13F(ω∗) =−F(ω)∗. (37) We can divide the contour CHin an upper contour Cu Hwhich extends from ǫ+i0+to∞+i0+ and a lower contour Cl Hwhich extends from ∞ −i0+toǫ−i0+. We then have due to Eq. (37) /integraldisplay CHdωF(ω) =/integraldisplay Cl HdωF(ω) +/integraldisplay Cu HdωF(ω) =/integraldisplay∞ ǫdωF(ω+i0+) +/integraldisplayǫ ∞dωF(ω−i0+) =/integraldisplay∞ ǫdωF(ω+i0+) +/integraldisplay∞ ǫdωF(ω+i0+)∗ =/integraldisplay Cu HdωF(ω) +c.c. (38) We restrict ourselves therefore to the upper contour Cu Hand understand that the complete result is the sum of the integral along the upper contour plus its complex conjugate. We then perform a change of variable to proceed to the ﬁnal dωintegration. Deﬁning u=√ Ω +iω√ Ω−iω. (39) and U(u) =dω duF(ω), (40) we have FH=n3/(Zα)4/integraldisplay u(CH)duU(u). (41) Note that u=/radicalBig Re(2ω−ω2) +iω /radicalBig Re(2ω−ω2)−iωforω∈CU H,Re(ω)∈[ǫ,2[, (42) whereas u=/radicalBig Re(ω2−2ω)−ω /radicalBig Re(ω2−2ω) +ωforω∈CU H,Re(ω)∈[2,∞), (43) where the argument of the square root is written in such a way a s to represent a positive real quantity in the two above equations. So u(ω= 0) = 1,u(ω= 2) = −1,u(∞+i0+) = 0, and u∈[−1,0) forω∈CU H,Re(ω)∈[2,∞). So forω∈CU H, Re(ω)∈[ǫ,2),uhas a nonvanishing imaginary part, whereas for ω∈CU H, Re(ω)∈[2,∞),uis a real quantity. The mapping ω→uis one-on-one for ω∈CU H. Note that if we had chosen the lower contour CL H, thenu(∞−i0+) =−∞. In that case, the above substitution would not have had the desired proper tyu→0 forω→ ∞. 14OnCU H,ωand√ Ω can be expressed as functions of uaccording to ω=−1 21−u2 u, √ Ω =−i 2(1−u)(1 +u) (−u), i. e.√ Ω extends along the negative imaginary axis for Re( ω)>2,u∈[−1,0]. The result forU(u) (4P1/2state) is U(u) = (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −1 192−1 96 (−1 +u)2/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)4/bracketleftbigg −47 20480+23 10240 ( −1 +u)4+23 10240 ( −1 +u)3 +79 40960 ( −1 +u)2+13 2048 (1 +u)4−13 2048 (1 +u)3+113 24576 (1 +u)2/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)6/bracketleftbigg −141737 41287680−39173 20643840 ( −1 +u)6−39173 10321920 ( −1 +u)5 −2228617 206438400 ( −1 +u)4−3485527 206438400 ( −1 +u)3−4685519 330301440 ( −1 +u)2 −499 46080 ( −1 +u)−343u 614400+1267 65536 (1 +u)8 −3801 65536 (1 +u)7+11765 131072 (1 + u)6−2715 32768 (1 +u)5 +69651 1310720 (1 + u)4−28021 1310720 (1 + u)3+89779 15728640 (1 + u)2/bracketrightbigg (44) The next step in the calculation is the uintegration, FH=n3/(Zα)4/integraldisplay0 u(ǫ+i0+)duU(u) +c.c.. (45) where u((ǫ+i0+) = 1 +i√ 2ǫ−ǫ−iǫ3/2 2√ 2+O(ǫ)5/2. (46) It is useful to deﬁne ˜ǫ= 1−u((ǫ+i0+) =−i√ 2ǫ+ǫ+iǫ3/2 2√ 2+O(ǫ)5/2. (47) Note that the ǫ-prescription calls for carrying out the u-integration from u(ǫ+i0+) to 0 and subsequently expanding the result in powers of ǫup toǫ0. For those terms which are ﬁnite when integrated from 1 to 0 we may carry out this integra tion without regarding the dependence on ǫ. For instance, 15/integraldisplay0 u(ǫ+i0+)du1 (1 +u)n=1−21−n n−1+O(√ǫ), (48) so in the limit ǫ→0, theǫdependent term vanishes. Terms of the form 1 /(1−u)n, however, introduce a divergence in 1 /˜ǫ. We have /integraldisplay0 u(ǫ+i0+)du1 (1−u)n=˜ǫ1−n−1 n−1. (49) We then add to the result of this integration the complex conj ugate and subsequently expand in powers of ǫ. This procedure is illustrated with some examples. For the t erms proportional to 1/(1−u)2we have /integraldisplay0 u(ǫ+i0+)du1 (1−u)2= 1−1 ˜ǫ, (50) so /integraldisplay0 u(ǫ+i0+)du1 (1−u)2+c.c.= 2−1 ˜ǫ−1 ˜ǫ∗ = 2−1 −i√ 2ǫ+ǫ+O(ǫ)3/2−1 i√ 2ǫ+ǫO(ǫ)3/2 = 2−/parenleftBiggi√ 2ǫ+1 2+O(ǫ)1/2/parenrightBigg −/parenleftBigg −i√ 2ǫ+1 2+O(ǫ)1/2/parenrightBigg = 2−1 +O(ǫ)1/2= 1 +O(ǫ)1/2. (51) For terms proportional to 1 /(1−u) we have /integraldisplay0 u(ǫ+i0+)du1 (1−u)= ln (˜ǫ), (52) so /integraldisplay0 u(ǫ+i0+)du1 1−u+c.c.= ln (˜ǫ) + ln (˜ǫ) = ln/parenleftBig −i√ 2ǫ+O(ǫ)/parenrightBig + ln/parenleftBig i√ 2ǫ+O(ǫ)/parenrightBig =−iπ 2+iπ 2+ 2 ln/parenleftBig√ 2ǫ/parenrightBig +O(ǫ)1/2 = ln 2 + lnǫ+O(ǫ)1/2(53) Note that for constant terms it results /integraldisplay0 u(ǫ+i0+)duconst.+c.c.=−2 const.+O(ǫ)1/2. (54) Using the results Eq. (51) and Eq. (54), it is easy to show that the spurious terms of order (Zα)2in the expression (44) vanish after the ﬁnal u-integration. The ﬁnal result for the high-energy-part (4 P1/2-state) is 16FH(4P1/2) =−1 6+ (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg24409 86400−499 720(ln 2 + lnǫ)−23 90ǫ/bracketrightbigg . (55) We give here the complete results for the high-energy-parts of the other states treated in this paper FH(3P1/2) =−1 6+ (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg6191 24300−268 405(ln 2 + lnǫ)−20 81ǫ/bracketrightbigg , (56) FH(3P3/2) =1 12+ (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg67903 194400−148 405(ln 2 + lnǫ)−20 81ǫ/bracketrightbigg , (57) FH(4P3/2) =1 12+ (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg31399 86400−137 360(ln 2 + lnǫ)−23 90ǫ/bracketrightbigg . (58) IV. THE LOW–ENERGY PART The low–energy part of the energy shift originates from low– energy virtual photons. The energy of the photons is comparable in magnitude to the bindi ng energy of the electron (order (Zα)2). Therefore it is impossible to expand the electron propaga tor in powers of the binding ﬁeld. We have to treat the binding ﬁeld non-perturba tively. An expansion in powers of (Zα) is accomplished by considering the spatial momenta of the v irtual photon and the electron momenta as expansion parameters. Choosing the Coulomb gauge for the photon propagator, one ﬁn ds that only the spatial elements of this propagator contribute [1]. The ω-integration along CLis performed ﬁrst, which leads to the following expression for EL, EL=−e2P/integraldisplay \|k\|<ǫd3k (2π)32\|k\|δT,ij/angbracketleftψ\|αieik·r 1 HD−(Eψ−ω)αje−ik·r\|ψ/angbracketright(ω≡ \|k\|).(59) HDdenotes the Dirac-Coulomb-Hamiltonian HD=α·p+βm+V,δTis the transverse delta function, and αirefers to the Dirac α-matrices. The principal value of the above integral is the real quantity corresponding to the energy shift in one–l oop order. The imaginary part of theCLintegration, which leads to the decay–width of the state, ha s been dropped in Eq. (59). In the matrix element Pij=/angbracketleftψ\|αieik·r 1 HD−(Eψ−ω)αje−ik·r\|ψ/angbracketright, (60) we introduce a unitary Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation U, Pij=/angbracketleftUψ\|(Uαieik·rU+)1 U(HD−(Eψ−ω))U+(Uαje−ik·rU+)\|Uψ/angbracketright. (61) The lower components of the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformed D irac wave function ψvanish up to (Zα)2, so that we may approximate \|Uψ/angbracketrightby 17\|Uψ/angbracketright=\|φ/angbracketright+\|δφ/angbracketrightwith /angbracketleftφ\|δφ/angbracketright= 0, (62) where \|φ/angbracketrightis the non–relativistic (Schr¨ odinger-Pauli) wave functi on, and \|δφ/angbracketrightis the relativistic correction. We deﬁne an operator acting on the spinors as even if it does no t mix upper and lower components of spinors, and we call the odd operator odd if it m ixes upper and lower com- ponents. The Foldy-Wouthuysen Hamiltonian consists of eve n operators only. For the upper left 2×2 submatrix of this Hamiltonian, we ﬁnd the result [13] HFW=U(HD−(Eψ−ω))U+=m+HS+δH, (63) whereHSrefers to the Schr¨ odinger–Hamiltonian, and δHis is the relativistic correction, δH=−(p)4 8m3+π(Zα) 2m2δ(r) +(Zα) 4m2r3σ·L (64) It is interesting to note the reason why we can ignore the lowe r 2×2 submatrix of the FW Hamiltonian in our scheme of calculation. The lower 2 ×2 submatrix contains the terms −m−(Eψ−ω)≈ −2mas the dominating ( Zα)0contribution. Therefore the integral vanishes in the limit ǫ→0. This can be checked by considering the integral in Eq. (59) , inserting a spectral resolution for the Dirac Coulomb propagator and p erforming the integral over d3kafter suitable angular averaging. The upper 2 ×2 submatrix has no ( Zα)0contribution, because terms proportional to mandEψcancel. This submatrix contributes to the Lamb shift. Now we turn to the calculation of the Foldy-Wouthuyse n transform of the operators αiexp (k·r). The expression Uαiexp (ik·r)U+is to be calculated. Assuming that ω=\|k\| is of the order O((Zα)2), we may expand the expression Uαieik·rU+in powers of ( Zα). The result of the calculation is Uαieik·rU+=αi/parenleftbigg 1 +i(k·r)−1 2(k·r)2/parenrightbigg −1 2m2pi(α·p) (65) +γ0pi m/parenleftbigg 1 +i(k·r)−1 2(k·r)2/parenrightbigg −γ01 2m3pip2−1 2m2α r3(r×Σ)i +1 2mγ0(k·r)(k×Σ)i−i 2mγ0(k×Σ)i. In the limit ǫ→0 the odd operators in the above expression do not contribute to the self energy in ( Zα)2relative order, because up to ( Zα)2relative order, these operators only join the upper components of the wave function with the lower components of the Dirac Coulomb Hamiltonian. This contribution vanishes, as descr ibed. So one can neglect the odd operators. By using symmetry arguments, it can be shown easi ly that the last term in the above expression (proportional to k×Σ) does not contribute to the Lamb shift in ( Zα)2 relative order for ǫ→0, either. Because we can ignore odd operators, and because the lower co mponents of the Foldy- Wouthuysen transformed wave function vanish, we keep only t he upper left 2 ×2 submatrix of Eq. ((65)), and we write Uαieik·rU+as 18Uαieik·rU+≃pi m/parenleftbigg 1 +i(k·r)−1 2(k·r)2/parenrightbigg (66) −1 2m3pip2−1 2m2α r3(r×σ)i +1 2m(k·r)(k×σ)i, This can be rewritten as Uαieik·rU+=pi meik·r+δyi, (67) whereδyiis of order ( Zα)3. It is understood that the termpi meik·ris also expanded up to the order (Zα)3. Denoting the Schr¨ odinger energy by E(E=−(Zα)2m/n2for nP states) and the ﬁrst relativistic correction to EbyδE, we can thus write the matrix element Pijas Pij=/angbracketleftφ+δφ\|/bracketleftBiggpi meik·r+δyi/bracketrightBigg1 HS−(E−ω) +δH−δE/bracketleftBiggpj me−ik·r+δyj/bracketrightBigg \|φ+δφ/angbracketright.(68) We now deﬁne the dimensionless quantity P=m 2δT,ijPij. (69) Up to (Zα)2, we can write the matrix element Pas the sum of the contributions ((70), (71), (72), (73), (74), (75)). The leading contribution (the “non -relativistic dipole”) is given by Pnd=1 3m/angbracketleftφ\|pi 1 HS−(E−ω)pi\|φ/angbracketright. (70) The other contributions to Pare [1] •the non-relativistic quadrupole, Pnq=1 3m/angbracketleftφ\|pieik·r 1 HS−(E−ω)pie−ik·r\|φ/angbracketright −Pnd, (71) •the corrections to the current αifrom the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation, Pδy=δT,ij/angbracketleftφ\|δyi 1 HS−(E−ω)pje−ik·r\|φ/angbracketright, (72) •the contribution due to the relativistic Hamiltonian, PδH=−1 3m/angbracketleftφ\|pi 1 HS−(E−ω)δH1 HS−(E−ω)pi\|φ/angbracketright, (73) •the contribution due to the relativistic correction to the e nergy, PδE=1 3m/angbracketleftφ\|pi 1 HS−(E−ω)δE1 HS−(E−ω)pi\|φ/angbracketright, (74) 19•and due to the relativistic correction to the wave function, Pδφ=2 3m/angbracketleftδφ\|pi 1 HS−(E−ω)pi\|φ/angbracketright. (75) Almost all of the above contributions are calculated using a coordinate space representation of the Schr¨ odinger Coulomb propagator given in [1] and [15] . Formulae given in [17] and [16] prove useful for the summation over the intermediate qu antum numbers. For the non- relativistic quadrupole contribution, however, we use the momentum space representation due to Schwinger [19] G(p,p′,Ω) = 4πmX3/parenleftBiggieiπτ 2 sinπτ/parenrightBigg/integraldisplay0+ 1dρρ−τd dρ ×1−ρ2 ρ1 /bracketleftBig X2(p−p′)2+ (p2+X2)(p′2+X2) (1−ρ)2/(4ρ)/bracketrightBig2, (76) whereX=√ −2mΩ,τ=mα/X . For non-integer τ, one may replace the complex integration around the origin (in the positive sense) by a much simpler in tegral /parenleftBiggieiπτ 2 sinπτ/parenrightBigg/integraldisplay0+ 1dρρ−τg(ρ)→/integraldisplay1 0dρρ−τg(ρ). (77) We then perform the calculation of PNQin momentum space using formulae given in the paper by Gavrila and Costescu [18]. The momentum space wave f unctions of P states are given in [19]. Calculations for PNQbecome increasingly complex. It should be noted that in the case of the 4P wave function, one has to deal with intermed iate expressions of up to 20,000 terms. We do not describe these calculations in any fu rther detail. Evaluations for this part of the calculation were done on IBM RISC/6000 systems with the help of the computer algebra system Mathematica [14]. The ﬁnalωintegration is done by change of variable ω→t,wheret=1/radicalBig 1 + (2n2ω)/((Zα)2m), (78) (t= 0 corresponds to ω=∞, andt= 1 corresponds to ω= 0). As an example for a Pmatrix element, we give here the result for a contribution to PδH(4P1/2), caused by the Russell-Saunders coupling term in the Foldy-Wouthuysen tr ansformed Dirac Hamiltonian: PL·S(4P1/2) =/angbracketleftφ\|pi 1 HS−(Eφ−ω)/bracketleftbiggα 4m2r3σ·L/bracketrightbigg1 HS−(Eφ−ω)pi\|φ/angbracketright = (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg 16384F366(t)t6(−1 + 2t) (1 + 2t) (−1 + 4t) (1 + 4t) (−5 + 9t2)2/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg /bracketleftbigg (675 (−1 +t)2(1 +t)14/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)2/bracketleftbigg 8192 Φ 23(t)t6(−1 + 2t) (1 + 2t) (−1 + 4t) (1 + 4t) (−5 + 9t2)2/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg 20/bracketleftbigg 675 (−1 +t)2(1 +t)14/bracketrightbigg −(Zα)2/bracketleftbigg 16384 Ψ 63(t)t6(−1 + 2t) (1 + 2t) (−1 + 4t) (1 + 4t) ×(−5 + 9t2)2/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 675 (−1 +t)2(1 +t)14/bracketrightbigg −(Zα)2/bracketleftbigg 16F4(t)t5(−5 + 9t2) (5 + 9t2)/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 45 (−1 +t)5(1 +t)5/bracketrightbigg −(Zα)2/bracketleftbigg 4096γt7(1 + 2t) (1 + 4t) (−5 + 9t2)2× ×/parenleftbigg −630 + 2988 t−22677t2+ 322539t3−1308681t4+ 5929071t5− +20884413 t6+ 53752275 t7−124047785t8+ 233683811 t9 −362131987t10+ 489361437 t11−552966475t12+ 526774701 t13 −433556447t14+ 298335889 t15−171601869t16+ 84114837 t17 −33425148t18+ 10588500 t19−2811264t20+ 536448t21 −64512t22+ 9216t23/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg /bracketleftbigg 675 (−2 +t) (−1 +t)8(1 +t)24 (−3 + 2t) (−7 + 4t) (−5 + 4t) (−3 + 4t)/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)2/bracketleftbigg t4/parenleftbigg 54385222500 + 13984771500 t+ 15573367761525 t2 +137704964619600 t3−1186676073750825 t4−891514989328950 t5 −18753057125404875 t6+ 257731557911828220 t7−644138132939443685 t8 −162189845176905698 t9+ 5703957333855251853 t10 −40461889136476779376 t11+ 179879463449806219483 t12 −470465622621377811686 t13+ 722355119079050313441 t14 −285989274333023499852 t15−2287627466701513790137 t16 +8721622433626707698710 t17−17878002921800012898021 t18+ +22584212519300184263992 t19−11732105237171234433515 t20 −22234628025915862014322 t21+ 73751337137966874205423 t22 −118367926111467660583708 t23+ 122509973591672089703233 t24 −68708753123836196116438 t25−27553239135523122581409 t26 +126820257213436783378720 t27−189954960243232498928039 t28 +199312481720191257908238 t29−164901212087123003552709 t30 +112286946900261699896044 t31−64112830789916243409479 t32 +30834230557497197343734 t33−12455975426801658077884 t34 +4211137005166537183048 t35−1183248309588246704096 t36 +270125031800068986496 t37−48193573673016712704 t38 +6583393931443034112 t39−691086520295792640 t40 +41007381492105216 t41+ 1314475331420160 t42/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg 21/bracketleftbigg 425250 ( −2 +t)2(−1 +t)10(1 +t)24(−3 + 2t)2 ×(−1 + 2t) (−7 + 4t)2(−5 + 4t)2(−3 + 4t)2(−1 + 4t)/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)2/bracketleftbigg 8192t8(−1 + 2t) (−1 + 4t) (−5 + 9t2)2(3 + 6t+ 3t2+ 8t3) ×ln(2/(1 +t))/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg/bracketleftbigg 675 (−1 +t)12(1 +t)6/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)2/bracketleftbigg 16G4(t)t5(−5 + 9t2) (−1125 + 2400 t+ 145390t2 −19200γt2−148320t3−2026412t4+ 418560γt4 +1027200t5+ 7316050t6−1920000γt6−1382400t7 −7444143t8+ 2211840γt8−19200t2ln(2/(1 +t)) + 418560 t4ln(2/(1 +t)) −1920000t6ln(2/(1 +t)) + 2211840 t8ln(2/(1 +t)))/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg /bracketleftbigg 10125 ( −1 +t)8(1 +t)8/bracketrightbigg +(Zα)2/bracketleftbigg 256t7(−5 + 9t2)2(8 + 45t−305t2−175t3+ 283t4 −265t5+ 3421t6+ 395t7+ 433t8) ln[(2t)/(1 +t)]/bracketrightbigg/slashbigg /bracketleftbigg 675 (−1 +t)12 (1 +t)7/bracketrightbigg , (79) where F4(t) =2F1/bracketleftBig 1,−4t,1−4t,((t−1)/(t+ 1))2/bracketrightBig , (80) G4(t) =2F1[1,−4t,1−4t,(t−1)/(t+ 1)], (81) F366(t) =t2∞/summationdisplay k=6((t−1)/(t+ 1))k 3−4t+k∂ ∂b(2F1)[−k,6,62/(1 +t)], (82) Φ23(t) =∞/summationdisplay k=6((t−1)/(t+ 1))2k (3−4t+k)2, (83) Ψ63(t) =∞/summationdisplay k=6((t−1)/(t+ 1))2k (3−4t+k)Ψ(k+ 6), (84) where Ψ denotes the logarithmic derivative of the Γ function . The quadratic singularity in the result for PL·S(4P1/2) in Eq. (79) at t= 3/4 (given by the ( −3 + 4t)2–term in the de- nominator of the purely rational function) corresponds to t he decay into the 3D state. One can check explicitly that the insertion of corresponding in termediate states in the spectral 22decomposition of the propagators necessitates the existen ce of quadratic singularities in the Pmatrix elements, and that the quadratic singularities occu r only in the matrix elements with two propagators. The quadratic singularities are a con sequence of the perturbative treatment of δHin the propagator 1 /(HS+δH−(Eφ+δE−ω)) (expansion in δHis not allowed in the vicinity of a pole of the resolvent G(E) = 1/(HS−E)). The integration pro- cedure for the quadratic singularities is as follows: ﬁrst w e isolate and calculate analytically the integral of the term that gives rise to the singularity (a s a function of t), then we take the diﬀerence of the edge terms at t= 1 andt= 0. This procedure takes back the eﬀect of the perturbative treatment and assigns the correct value to thetintegral. As the ﬁnal step, we subtract the term that gave rise to the quadratic singular ity and proceed with the rest of the terms in the usual way described in [1]. The integration procedure deserves some further comments. We also encounter in the matrix elements singularities of linear type at t= 1/4,t= 1/2 andt= 3/4, which also cor- respond to the decay of the excited state. The residue taken a t these singularities yields the decay width of the respective states. In order to obtain the p rincipal value of the t-integral, one has to symmetrize the integrand around all the singulari ties. This is also accomplished by symbolic procedures written in the computer algebra lang uageMathematica . The results of the calculations have been checked in many way s. An important cross- check is the cancellation of ǫ-divergent terms in the sum of the high and low–energy parts. By considering the expansion of the propagators in powers of 1 /ω, the logarithmic singularities of all contributions can be calculated individually and agr ee with the results obtained from complete evaluation. The contributions to the low–energy part FLin (Zα)2relative order are given in Table I and Table II. Summing all contributions, we obtain the foll owing complete results for the contribution of the low energy parts FL: FL(3P1/2) =−4 3lnk0(3P) + (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −0.94378(1) +20 81ǫ+268 405lnǫ (Zα)2/bracketrightbigg , (85) FL(3P3/2) =−4 3lnk0(3P) + (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −0.69356(1) +20 81ǫ+148 405lnǫ (Zα)2/bracketrightbigg , (86) FL(4P1/2) =−4 3lnk0(4P) + (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −0.99780(1) +23 90ǫ+499 720lnǫ (Zα)2/bracketrightbigg , (87) and FL(4P3/2) =−4 3lnk0(4P) + (Zα)2/bracketleftbigg −0.73057(1) +23 90ǫ+137 360lnǫ (Zα)2/bracketrightbigg . (88) V. RESULTS AND EVALUATION OF THE LAMB SHIFT Summing the contributions from the high and low–energy part s, we obtain the following results for the scaled Ffunction deﬁned in Eq. (2): 23F(3P1/2) =−1 6−4 3lnk0(3P) + (Zα)2/bracketleftBigg −1.14768(1) +268 405ln[(Zα)−2]/bracketrightBigg , (89) F(3P3/2) =1 12−4 3lnk0(3P) + (Zα)2/bracketleftBigg −0.59756(1) +148 405ln[(Zα)−2]/bracketrightBigg , (90) F(4P1/2) =−1 6−4 3lnk0(3P) + (Zα)2/bracketleftBigg −1.19568(1) +499 720ln[(Zα)−2]/bracketrightBigg , (91) F(4P3/2) =1 12−4 3lnk0(3P) + (Zα)2/bracketleftBigg −0.63094(1) +137 360ln[(Zα)−2]/bracketrightBigg . (92) The results obtained for A4,0andA6,1are in agreement with those previously known [3]. The values of the Bethe logarithms [5], [6] lnk0(3P) = −0.03819023(1) ,lnk0(4P) = −0.04195489(1) (93) could be veriﬁed numerically with a 7 ﬁgure accuracy from our analytic expressions by numerical (Gaussian) integration. For A6,1, we use the following general formula which may be extracted from the work by Erickson and Yennie ( [4], Eq. (4 .4a) ibid., upon subtraction of the vacuum polarization contribution implicitly contai ned in the quoted equation): A6,1(n,l,j) =4 3/bracketleftBigg (1−δl,0)8 (3−(l(l+ 1))/n2) (2l−1) (2l) (2l+ 1) (2l+ 2) (2l+ 3) +δl,1/bracketleftbigg 1−1 n2/bracketrightbigg/bracketleftbigg1 10+1 4δj,l−1/2/bracketrightbigg +δl,0/bracketleftbigg −601 240−77 60n2+ 7 ln2 + 3 ( γ−lnn+ Ψ(n+ 1))/bracketrightbigg/bracketrightBigg , (94) whereγis Euler’s constant, and Ψ refers to the logarithmic derivat ive of the Γ function. For P states (l= 1), this formula reduces to A6,1(n,1,j) =4 3/bracketleftbigg1 15/parenleftbigg 3−2 n2/parenrightbigg +/parenleftbigg 1−1 n2/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg1 10+1 4δj,1/2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg (95) and is in agreement with our results. From our results for F, we extract the following new values for the coeﬃcients A6,0: A6,0(3P1/2) =−1.14768(1), A 6,0(3P3/2) =−0.59756(1), (96) and A6,0(4P1/2) =−1.19568(1), A 6,0(4P3/2) =−0.63094(1). (97) The new results for A6,0are the main results of this work. They are in excellent agree ment with data obtained from numerical calculations by one of the authors (PJM) and Y. K. Kim 24[2]. Mohr and Kim calculate the Ffunction deﬁned in (2) numerically for Z≥10, treating the binding ﬁeld non-perturbatively. By extrapolating the ir numerical data [2] to the region of smallZ, we obtain the following estimates for the remainder functi onGSE,7implicitly deﬁned in Eq. (2). GSE,7(3P1/2,Z= 1) = 3.6±0.5, G SE,7(3P3/2,Z= 1) = 2.6±0.5, (98) and GSE,7(4P1/2,Z= 1) = 3.9±0.5, G SE,7(4P3/2,Z= 1) = 2.8±0.5. (99) The uncertainties in GSE,7are used to estimate the theoretical uncertainty from the on e– loop contribution. When modeling the numerical data, it mus t be taken into account that as noted by Karshenboim [20], A7,1coeﬃcients vanish for P states. Values of A6,0andGSE,7 for 2P states are given in [1]. We use the following implicit d eﬁnition of the Lamb shift L: E=mr[f(n,j)−1]−m2 r 2(m+mN)[f(n,j)−1]2+L+Ehfs, (100) whereEis the energy level of the two-body-system and f(n,j) is the dimensionless Dirac energy,mis the electron mass, mris the reduced mass of the system and mNis the nuclear mass. It should be noted that we consider the hfs–fs mixing te rm as a contribution to the hyperﬁne structure. The small hfs-fs-mixing correction wh ich is discussed in [21], mixes the F= 1 sublevels of the P 1/2and P 3/2states and shifts the center of the hyperﬁne levels. It should be taken into account when the ﬁne structure is deduce d from precision experiments. In order to calculate the Lamb shift, we include the Barker-G lover correction to hydrogen energy levels [22], which we refer to as the ( Zα)4recoil correction. We also include the ( Zα)5 recoil correction calculated by E. Salpeter [23], and the re sults [24] for recoil corrections of order (Zα)6mr/mN. The results for recoil corrections of order ( Zα)6mr/mNhave been conﬁrmed by K. Pachucki (see ch. 5 of [1]). We include contrib utions from the higher order two–loop correction of order ( α/π)2(Zα)6ln2(Zα)−2corresponding to the B6,2–coeﬃcient [25], and for three–loop corrections in lowest order. The th eoretical error from the two–loop contribution ( B6,1and higher terms) is estimated as half the contribution from the recently calculatedB6,2–coeﬃcient. The higher order contributions due to vacuum po larization of orderα/π(Zα)6can be obtained by analyzing the small distance behavior of t he Dirac wave function, i.e. by evaluating the matrix element of the Uehli ng potential (see e.g. [27]), VVP(r) =α(Zα) m2/bracketleftBigg −4 15δ(r)−1 35∇2 m2δ(r) +O/parenleftBig ∇4δ(r)/parenrightBig/bracketrightBigg , (101) with P-state wavefunctions expanded in powers of Zα. We obtain the results Avac 60(nP1/2) =−3 35n2−1 n2(102) and Avac 60(nP3/2) =−2 105n2−1 n2(103) 25for the leading term. We have also evaluated the contributio n of the Uehling potential numerically without expansion in Zαwith the results GU,7(3P1/2,Z= 1) = 0.0455, G U,7(3P3/2,Z= 1) = 0.0249, (104) and GU,7(4P1/2,Z= 1) = 0.0480, G U,7(4P3/2,Z= 1) = 0.0262 (105) where the function GU,7is deﬁned in analogy with GSE,7. The contribution of the higher- order terms is negligible compared to the uncertainty in the higher-order self energy terms. The Wichmann-Kroll vacuum polarization contribution is ex pected to be of order ( Zα)2 times the Uehling correction and is not included here. The above mentioned contributions to the Lamb shift are list ed in the Tables III and IV for the states under investigation. It should be noted that t he reduced mass dependence of the terms must be restored in low Zsystems to obtain the correct value for the Lamb shift. Terms which are caused by the anomalous magnetic moment of th e electron acquire a factor (mr/me)2(wheremris the reduced mass of the system and methe mass of the electron), all other contributions to the Lamb shift acquire a factor ( mr/me)3. In addition, the argument of the logarithms ln[( Zα)−2] must be replaced by ln[( me/mrZα)−2]. The relevant formulae are also given in [3]). It should also be noted that for two–loop and three–loop corr ections in respective lowest order (α/π)2(Zα)4and (α/π)3(Zα)4, only the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron contributes to the Lamb shift for P states, because the Dirac form factor F1(q2) is infrared ﬁnite in two– and three–loop order. So it is only the contribu tion from the magnetic form factorF2(q2= 0) which persists. The calculation of the contribution to t he Lamb shift is then straightforward. We obtain the following theoretical results for the Lamb shi ft of 3P and 4P states: L(3P1/2) =−3473.75(3) kHz, (106) L(3P3/2) = 4037.75(3) kHz, (107) L(4P1/2) =−1401.52(1) kHz, (108) L(4P3/2) = 1767.30(1) kHz. (109) The theoretical values for the ﬁne structure splitting, usi ng the 1987 Cohen–Taylor value of α−1= 137.0359895(61) [28], are as follows: ∆Efs(3P) = 3250089 .8(3) kHz (110) ∆Efs(4P) = 1371130 .0(1) kHz (111) For 2P states, the theoretical value is ∆ Efs(2P) = 10969043(1) kHz [1]. The uncertainty in the theoretical values for the ﬁne structure splitting is gi ven by the uncertainty in α. Any 26determination of the ﬁne structure beyond the quoted uncert ainty would yield a value of α improved with respect to the 1987 value. Given the scatterin g of available data for α[29], such a determination could be useful for checking the consis tency of measurements coming from diﬀerent ﬁelds of physics. The formula for the ﬁne structure as a function of αfor atomic hydrogen ( Z= 1) is as follows: ∆Efs(n) =E(nP3/2)−E(nP1/2) =R∞/bracketleftbigg α2/parenleftbiggy 2n3−x2y3 2n3/parenrightbigg +α3/parenleftbiggy2 2πn3/parenrightbigg +α4/parenleftBigga(2) ey2 π2n3+7y 32n3+9y 16n4−3y 4n5+xy2 4n5(1 +x)/parenrightBigg +α5/parenleftBigga(3) ey2 π3n3+2y3 πn3/parenleftBigg ∆A6,0(n) +1 15n2−1 n2−1 3n2−1 n2ln(y−1α−2)/parenrightBigg/parenrightBigg +α6/parenleftBigg2y3 πn3∆G(n) +31y 256n3+45y 128n4+7y 64n3−45y 32n6+15y 16n7/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg +δLth(n) (112) where the theoretical uncertainty in the diﬀerence of the La mb shift of nP states is given by δLth(2) = 80 Hz , δLth(3) = 30 Hz , δLth(4) = 10 Hz . (113) The mass ratios are x=me/mpandy=mr/me= 1/(1 +x). (114) ∆A6,0(n) and ∆G(n) are deﬁned as ∆A6,0(n) =A6,0(nP3/2)−A6,0(nP1/2),∆G(n) =GSE,7(nP3/2)−GSE,7(nP1/2).(115) For practical purposes, the n-dependence of ∆ GSE,7(n) may be suppressed, because it is a very small contribution (in the 1 Hz range), and we may assume ∆GSE,7(n)≈ −1.0. The two– and three–loop coeﬃcients to the anomalous magnetic mo ment are given by [29] a(e) 2=−0.328478965 and a(e) 3= 1.18124156. (116) VI. CONCLUSIONS The analytic calculation of higher order binding correctio ns to the Lamb shift of excited P states has been described in this paper. We provide more acc urate theoretical values of the Lamb shift for 3P and 4P states in hydrogenlike systems. We also give a formula for the ﬁne structure as a function of α(for 2P, 3P and 4P states), which may be used to determine αfrom an improved measurement of the ﬁne structure. With the possibility of substantial improvement in the prec ision of spectroscopic experi- ments (trapped atoms), a better determination of αfrom measurement of the ﬁne structure 27might be within reach in the near future. Such a determinatio n of the ﬁne structure con- stantα, from the eﬀect on which its name is based, would complement o ther high precision determinations from solid state physics and the anomalous m agnetic moment of the electron. We note that there are deviations of experimental data for ex cited nS–nP transitions from theory by more than one standard deviation but less than two standard deviations (see [21] and references therein). However, both theory of t he Lamb shift and spectroscopic techniques have improved since the measurements were made, so one might expect a more precise comparison of theory and experiment in the future. T he present uncertainty in the theory would in principle allow a determination of the ﬁne st ructure constant with a relative uncertainty of less than 5 parts in 109. However at this level of precision additional theoretical work might be needed to address questions such as asymmetrie s in the natural line shape. We only mention that for excited states, an experimental det ermination of the ﬁne structure could be simpliﬁed by the slower decay (narrower line width) of the higher excited P states [8]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank DFG for continued support (contract no. SO 333/1-2). We would like to thank K. Pachucki and S. Karshenboim for stimulating and h elpful discussions, and J. Urban for carefully reading the manuscript. (PJM) acknowle dges the Alexander von Hum- boldt Foundation for continued support. We also wish to ackn owledge support from BMBF and from the Gesellschaft f¨ ur Schwerionenforschung. 28REFERENCES [1] U. D. Jentschura and K. Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1853 (1996). [2] P. J. Mohr and Y. K. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 45, 2727 (1992). [3] J. Sapirstein and D. R. Yennie, in “Quantum Electrodynam ics”, edited by T. Kinoshita, World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1990. [4] G. W. Erickson and D. R. Yennie, Ann. Phys. (N.Y) 35, 271, 447 (1965). [5] S. Klarsfeld and A. Maquet, Phys. Lett. 43B, 201 (1973). [6] G. W. F. Drake and R. A. Swainson, Phys. Rev. A 41, 1243 (1990). [7] K. Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 46, 648 (1992); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 226, 1 (1993). [8] H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- a nd Two-Electron Atoms, Plenum (N.Y.), 1957. [9] P. J. Mohr, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 26 (1974). [10] P. J. Mohr, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 52 (1974). [11] P. J. Mohr, Phys. Rev. A 26, 2338 (1982). [12] P. J. Mohr, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4421 (1992). [13] C. Itzykson and J. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, Mc Graw- Hill, New York, 1980. [14] S. Wolfram, “Mathematica-A System for Doing Mathemati cs by Computer”, Addison- Wesley, Reading (MA), 1988 (endorsement by NIST is not impli ed). [15] R. A. Swainson and G. W. F. Drake, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 24, 79 (1991). [16] H. Buchholz, “The Conﬂuent Hypergeometric Function”, Springer Verlag, New York/Berlin, 1969. [17] H. Bateman, “Higher Transcendental Functions”, McGra w-Hill, New York, 1953. [18] M. Gavrila and A. Costescu, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1752 (1970). [19] M. Lieber, in “Quantum Electrodynamics”, edited by T. K inoshita, World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1990. [20] S. Karshenboim, ZhETF 106, 414 (1994) /in Russian/; JETP 79, 230 (1994). [21] F. Pipkin in “Quantum Electrodynamics”, edited by T. Ki noshita, World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1990. [22] W. A. Barker and F. N. Glover, Phys. Rev. 99, 317 (1955). [23] E. Salpeter, Phys. Rev. 87, 328 (1952). [24] E. Golosov, A. S. Elkhovskii, A. I. Milshtein, I. B. Khri plovich, ZhETF 107, 393 (1995) /in Russian/; JETP 80(2), 208 (1995). [25] S. Karshenboim, J. Phys. B 29, L29 (1996). [26] E. R. Cohen and B. N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1121 (1987). [27] N. L. Manakov, A. A. Nekipelov and A. G. Fainshtein, ZhET F95, 1167 (1989) /in Russian/; JETP 68, 673 (1989). [28] E. R. Cohen and B. N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1121 (1987). [29] T. Kinoshita, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 1459 (1996). 29TABLES contribution 3P1/2 3P3/2 Fnq −1.433010(1) + 248 /405 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig+ −1.433010(1) + 248 /405 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig Fδy 0.922653(1) −20/81 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig0.629717(1) −20/81 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig FδH 0.356318(1) −73/324 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig0.333053(1) −55/324 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig FδE 0.0406519(1) + 1 /36 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig0.013551(1) + 1 /108 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig Fδφ −0.830340(1) + 40 /81 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig−0.236869(1) + 13 /108 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig sum −0.94378(1) + 268 /405 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig−0.69356(1) + 148 /405 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig TABLE I. Contributions of relative order ( Zα)2to the low–energy part FLfor the 3 P1/2and 3P3/2states. contribution 4P1/2 4P3/2 Fnq −1.512220(1) + 229 /360 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig−1.512220(1) + 229 /360 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig Fδy 0.966398(1) −23/90 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig0.662154(1) −23/90 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig FδH 0.364541(1) −2891/11520 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig0.342940(1) −439/2304 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig FδE 0.0335504(1) + 13 /768 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig0.012904(1) + 5 /768 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig Fδφ −0.850066(1) + 787 /1440 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig−0.236345(1) + 53 /288 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig sum −0.99780(1) + 499 /720 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig−0.73057(1) + 137 /360 ln/parenleftbigǫ/(Zα)2/parenrightbig TABLE II. Contributions of relative order ( Zα)2to the low–energy part FLfor the 4 P1/2and 4P3/2states 30contribution 3P1/2in kHz 3P3/2in kHz one-loop self-energy −3477.349(5) 4046.413(5) two-loop self-energy 7.705(23) −3.782(23) three-loop self-energy −0.064 0.032 vacuum polarization −0.122 −0.027 (Zα)4recoil 0.641 −0.320 (Zα)5recoil −4.705(13) −1.915(13) (Zα)6recoil 0.139 0.139 Sum for 3 P −3473.75(3) 4037.75(3) TABLE III. Contributions to the Lamb shift in kHz for the 3 P1/2and 3P3/2states. contribution 4P1/2in kHz 4P3/2in kHz one-loop self-energy −1403.102(2) 1770.887(2) two-loop self-energy 3.252(10) −1.594(10) three-loop self-energy −0.027 0.014 vacuum polarization −0.054 −0.012 (Zα)4recoil 0.270 −0.135 (Zα)5recoil −1.915(5) −1.915(5) (Zα)6recoil 0.061 0.061 Sum for 4 P −1401.52(1) 1767.30(1) TABLE IV. Contributions to the Lamb shift in kHz for the 4 P1/2and 4P3/2states. 31FIGURES/- /6/#/! /-/- / / / / / Re/( /! /) Im /( /! /)CFCF /2 m/1FIG. 1. Feynman contour for ωintegration (one–loop self energy). Lines directly below a nd above the real axis denote branch cuts from the photon and ele ctron propagator. Crosses denote poles originating from the discrete spectrum of the electro n propagator./- /6/'/& /-/- /6/6 / / / / / Re/( /! /) Im /( /! /)CM CMEn/1FIG. 2. Mohr’s contour for evaluating the one–loop self ener gy contribution to the Lamb shift./- /6/'/& /-/ /6/6 / / / / / Re/( /! /) Im /( /! /)CLCL CHCH //1FIG. 3. The ω-integration contour used by Pachucki and in the calculatio n presented in this paper. For the divergent terms in the high–energy part, we us e the Wick-rotated contour given by the lines extending to ǫ±i∞. For the naively convergent terms, we use the original conto urCH which extends to + ∞ ±iδ. 32FIG. 4. Expansion of the bound electron self energy in powers of the binding ﬁeld. 33
arXiv:physics/0007024v1 [physics.geo-ph] 10 Jul 2000EFFECTS OF THE AUGUST 11, 1999 TOTAL SOLAR ECLIPSE AS DEDUCED FROM TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT MEASUREMENTS AT THE GPS NETWORK E. L. Afraimovich, E. A. Kosogorov, O. S. Lesyuta Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SD RAS, p. o. box 4026, Irkutsk, 664033, Russia fax: +7 3952 462557; e-mail: afra@iszf.irk.ru Abstract We present the results derived from measuring fundamental p arameters of the ionospheric response to the August 11, 1999 total sola r eclipse. Our study is based on using the data from about 70 GPS stations loc ated in the neighbourhood of the eclipse totality phase in Europe. T he eclipse period was characterized by a low level of geomagnetic distu rbance ( Dst- variation from -10 to -20 nT), which alleviated signiﬁcantl y the problem of detecting the ionospheric response to the eclipse. Our anal ysis revealed a well-deﬁned eﬀect of a decrease (depression) of the total el ectron content (TEC) for all GPS stations. The delay between minimum TEC val ues with respect to the totality phase near the eclipse path increase d gradually from 4 min in Greenwich longitude (10:40 UT, LT) to 8 min at the long itude 16◦(12:09 LT). The depth and duration of the TEC depression were found to be 0.2-0.3 TECU and 60 min, respectively. The results obta ined in this study are in good agreement with earlier measurements and th eoretical estimates. 1 Introduction Experimental observations of the ionosphere at the time of s olar eclipses provide the source of information about the character of behavior of the various iono- spheric parameters. Regular ionospheric eﬀects of solar ec lipses are fairly well understood. They imply an increase of eﬀective reﬂection he ights, a reduction in concentration in the F-layer maximum, and a decrease in tota l electron content 1(TEC) in the ionosphere, which is typical of the transition t o the nightside iono- sphere (Cohen, 1984). The behavior of the above parameters c an be modeled using appropriate ionospheric models (Stubbe, 1970; Boitm an et al., 2000). The main parameters of the ionospheric response are the valu e of the delay τ with respect to the eclipse totality phase, as well as its amp litude Aand duration ∆T. Almost all publications devoted to the study of the ionosph eric response to solar eclipses present estimates of these parameters. A k nowledge of these values makes it possible to reﬁne, in terms of the respective aeronomic ionospheric models, the time constants of ionization and recombination processes at diﬀerent heights in the ionopshere. The measurements of τwere made by analyzing the characteristics of the ionosphere-reﬂected radio signal at vertical-incidence s oundings at a network of ionospheric stations (Marriott et al., 1969; Goncharov et a l., 1982; Boitman et al., 2000) by measuring the frequency Doppler shift at verti cal- and oblique- incidence soundings (Boitman et al., 2000). In the cited ref erences, the value of τwas found to vary from 0 (Marriott et al., 1969) to 20 min, with the amplitude Aof a decrease in local electron density of order 9 ×104cm−3, and the response duration of about 1 hour (Boitman et al., 2000). Similar measurements at an ionospheric station were made du ring the solar eclipse of September 23, 1987 in the south-eastern Asia (Che ng, 1992). The am- plitude, delay and duration of the ionospheric response wer e found to be 0 .3×106 cm−3, 18 min and 1 hour 30 min, respectively. At the same time, meas urements during the eclipse of October 24, 1995 in the same region prov ided an estimate of τof about 80 min (Huang, 1999), ∆ T= 1 hour 20 min, and Ain excess of 1 ×106 cm−3. The measurements of f0F2 over the Scaramanga station during a partial solar eclipse of May 20, 1996 (Anastassiadis, 1970) give the value of τof about 38 min. In paper Zherebtsov et al. (1998a), the delay time of t he ionospheric response to the eclipse was between 25 and 30 min (at 300 km alt itude). Interesting results were obtained in observations of an ann ular solar eclipse of May 30, 1984 at the Millstone Hill incoherent scatter rada r (Salah, 1986). A decrease in electron density with respect to the eclipse tot ality phase occurred in this case 20–30 min later, with A= 4×106cm−3, and ∆ T= 2 hours 15 min. However, facilities of this kind are too few to be extensivel y used in experiments during solar eclipses. The ionospheric response to the March 9, 1997 total solar ecl ipse was inves- tigated using a network of ionosondes (Zherebtsov et al., 19 98b). For this event, the position of the minimum of the trough in the time dependen ce of electron density was shifted with respect to the time of maximum occul tation of the solar disk by 10–15 min, with A= 1×105cm−3, ∆T= 1 hour 15 min. A large amount of data was obtained by measuring the Faraday r otation of the plane of polarization of VHF signals of geostationary satel lites (Klobuchar et al., 1970; Hunter et al., 1974; Davies,1980; Rama Rao, 1982; Esse x, 1982; Deshpande, 1982; Singh, 1989). These measurements revealed the eclips e-induced eﬀect of 2a deep depression (decrease) in TEC with the amplitude Avarying from 2 to 14 TECU, and with a typical time of TEC depression and recover y of about several hours (the unit of measurement of TEC that is adopted in the literature corresponds to 1016−2). The spread in the values of τwas also found to vary over a wide range, from 5 to 40 min. According to Klobuchar et al. (1970), for a total solar eclip se that occurred in spring (March 7, 1970), the amplitude Awas 11 TECU, ∆ T= 2 hours 44 min, and τof order 33 min. For the total solar eclipse of February 16, 19 80, the observations at Waltair (Singh, 1989) gave the followin g estimates: A= 0.11 TECU, ∆ T= 1 hour, and τ= 20 min. Essex et al. (1982) inferred that for the total solar eclipse of February 20, 1979, the values of Aandτare 14 TECU and 33 min, respectively. Hence a large body of experimental data do not permit us to mak e any re- liable estimates of the basic parameters of the ionospheric response. One of the reason for such a great diﬀerence is attributable to the use o f diﬀerent methods of measurements which diﬀer greatly by spatial and temporal re solution. However, the main reason is caused by dissimilar characteristics of t he eclipse itself, by geophysical conditions of individual measurements, and by a large diﬀerence of the latitude, longitude and local time when experiments are conducted. To obtain more reliable information about the behaviour of t he ionosphere during an eclipse, it is necessary to carry out simultaneous measurements over a large area covering regions with a diﬀerent local time. Furt hermore, high spatial (of some tens of kilometres at least) and temporal (at least 1 min) resolution is needed. However, none of the above familiar methods meets su ch requirements. The development of the global navigation system GPS and the c reation, on its basis, of extensive networks of GPS stations (which at the en d of 1999 consisted of no less than 600 sites), the data from which are placed on th e INTERNET (Klobuchar, 1997), open up a new era in remote sensing of the i onosphere. At almost any point of the globe and at any time at two coherently -coupled fre- quencies f1= 1575 .42 MHz and f2= 1227 .60 MHz, two-frequency multichannel receivers of the GPS system are used to carry out high-precis ion measurements of the group and phase delay along the line o sight between the ground-based receiver and satellite-borne transmitters in the zone of re ception. The sensitivity aﬀorded by phase measurements in the GPS system permits irre gularities to be detected with an amplitude of up to 10−3–10−4of the diurnal variation of TEC. Afraimovich et al. (1998) were the ﬁrst to use in a detailed an alysis of regular ionopsheric eﬀects measurements of TEC and its gradients fo r the total solar eclipse of March 9, 1997, using for this purpose the GPS inter ferometer at Irkutsk. Their results bear witness to signiﬁcant changes occurring in the process of ion production in the ionosphere during the solar eclipse, simu ltaneously in a large volume of space with a radius of at least 300 km at 300 km altitu de. The delay of a minimum TEC value with respect to the phase of totality is about 10 min, the depth of TEC depression varies from 1 to 3 TECU, and ∆ T= 1 hour 15 min. 3Boitman et al. (2000) obtained a good agreement of these data , as well of measurements for several HF Doppler sounding paths with res ults of a numerical simulations using the ionosphere-plasmasphere coupling m odel (Krinberg, 1984). Unfortunately, during this eclipse the total shadow’s path in 1997 was monitored by only few GPS stations; therefore, it was not possible to de termine the spatial- temporal characteristics of the ionopsheric response. According to the data from ﬁve GPS stations reported by Tsai a nd Liu (1999) for the solar eclipses of October 24, 1995 and March 9, 1997, t he delay τvaried over a broad range, from 0 to 30 min, the amplitude Awas close to 7 TECU, and ∆Tvaried from 40 min to 1 hour. A unique opportunity to exploit the potential of the GPS netw ork was pro- vided by the total solar eclipse of August 11, 1999. For this p eriod of time, the INTERNET made available the data from at least 100 GPS statio ns located in Western and Central Europe within and near the totality path . A massive ﬂow of publications on the various ionospheric eﬀects of this ecli pse should be forthcom- ing, based on the GPS data in conjunction with the data from ot her observing facilities. The objective of this paper is to determine the b asic parameters of the ionospheric response to the August 11, 1999 total solar ecli pse using these data. General information about the eclipse, and a description of the experimen- tal geometry are given in Section 2. The ionospheric respons e to the eclipse is discussed in Section 3 using the data from reference ionosph eric station Chilton. The processing technique for the GPS network data, and resul ts derived from analysing the ionospheric response of the August 11, 1999 so lar eclipse in Europe are outlined in Section 4. Results obtained in this study are discussed in Section 5. 2 The geometry and general information of to- tal solar eclipse AUGUST 11, 1999 The last solar eclipse in the 20–th century began in North Atl antic, and path of the Moon’s shadow made ﬁrst landfall in south-western Engla nd at 10:10 UT; the Sun at that time was at an angle of 45◦over the eastern horizon. The centre line duration of total eclipse averaged 2 min, and the total e clipse was conﬁned to a narrow corridor 103 km wide. Fig. 1 shows a schematic map of the path of the Moon’s shadow cr ossing parts of Western and Central Europe (the data from Espenak, 1 999 were used in constructing this map). The centre line of eclipse at ground level is shown as a thick line, and thin lines correspond to its southern and nor thern boundaries. The location of reference ionospheric station Chilton (RAL) is marked by the symbol ⋆. Dots •and symbols + show the locations of the GPS stations used in th e analysis; their geographic coordinates are presented in Ta ble 1. Dots •, together 4with symbols + are used to represent a total set of GPS station s. Symbols + form a network of GPS stations located near the eclipse path; ther efore, we designated this group as the near zone. Numbers for the longitudes 10◦W, 0◦, 10◦E, 20◦E, 30◦E, 40◦Ecorrespond to the local time for these longitudes. In this paper we conﬁne ourselves to analysing only to a regio n of Western and Central Europe from the coast of southern England to the poin t with coordinates 56.03◦N, 37.2◦E, where the totality phase was observed at 11:20 UT (14:20 LT) . Thus the solar eclipse eﬀect occurred for the conditions of t he daytime summer ionosphere. The distance along the great-circle arc between the above-m entioned extreme points is about 2900 km, with the time diﬀerence of 67 min only . Hence a distinguishing characteristic of this eclipse was the supe rsonic speed of the Moon’s shadow sweeping through the terrestrial surface, exceedin g 720 m/s. At ionospheric heights the totality path was travelling som ewhat further south. The onset time of the totality phase for the height h=3 00 km over Bu- dapest is 1.3 min ahead of that at ground level. The diﬀerence in the values of the totality phases and their onset times is caused by the Sun ’s altitude over the horizon. At the time of the totality phase in Budapest (11:05 UT, or 14:05 LT), it was as small as 59◦. The period under consideration was characterized by a low le vel of geomag- netic disturbance ( Dst-variation from -10 to -20 nT), which simpliﬁed greatly the problem of detecting the ionospheric response of eclipse. 3 The ionospheric response by eclipse from date of ionospheric station Chilton First we consider the variations of critical frequencies f0F2 over the time interval 00:00-24:00 UT on August 11, 1999 according to the data from s tation Chilton (RAL) - Fig. 2a. The onset time of the totality phase of eclips e in the area of sta- tion Chilton (RAL) at 300 km altitude is shown by a vertical so lid line. As might be expected under the conditions of the summer ionosphere, t he mean level of f0F2 diﬀers only slightly for the night-time and daytime. Never theless, a decrease off0F2 during the totality phase of eclipse is suﬃciently clearly distinguished. Consider the variations of ionospheric parameters for the t ime interval 06:00– 15:00 UT on August 11, 1999, and on the background days of Augu st 10 and 12, using the data from station Chilton (RAL) - Fig. 3. Dots co rrespond to variations of critical frequencies f0F2 (panel a), f0F1 (panel c), apparent heights h′F(panel b), and h′F2 (panel d) for August 11, 1999. Solid curves plot the same values that are smoothed with a time window of 60 min. For August 10 and 12, only smoothed curves are given, with the same time win dow of 60 min. 5The onset time of the totality phase of eclipse (10:16 UT) at 3 00 km altitude over the station is shown by a thin vertical line. The eclipse eﬀect is most conspicuous in the variations of cr itical frequencies f0F2, whose maximum diﬀerence from the background values on Aug ust 10 and 12 at the time of reaching a minimum (10:20 UT) was up to 2 MHz. O n the other hand, the amplitude of a decrease of f0F2 for the August 11 event (after the totality phase of eclipse) does not exceed 1 MHz. The ecli pse eﬀect on other parameters is not as clearly distinguished, and becomes evi dent only when com- paring the smoothed curves. Similar results of measurement s at an ionospheric station were obtained during the total solar eclipse of Sept ember 23, 1987 in South-Eastern Asia (K. Cheng, 1992). Thef0F2 – variations, measured at station Chilton (RAL) at time int ervals of 4 min, are presented in greater detail in Fig. 4a (heavy dot s). The solid curve connecting these dots is an approximating one for these valu es. This panel plots also the geometrical function of eclipse S(t) at 300 km altitude, calculated for station Chilton. Minimum values of f0F2 and S(t) correspond to the points A and B in this ﬁgure. The respective delay τbetween the time of a minimum of f0F2 and of the function S(t) is close to 4 min in this case. The data from the station Chilton (RAL) and from GPS station H ERS nearest to it are compared in the next Section. 4 The process of GPS–network data and results of analysis of ionospheric eﬀect by total solar eclipse of August 11, 1999 We now give a brief account of the sequence of procedures used in processing the GPS data. Input data are represented by series of ”obliqu e” values of TEC I(t), as well as by the corresponding series of elevations θ(t) measured from the ground, and azimuths α(t) of the line of sight to the satellite measured clockwise from the northward direction. These parameters are calcula ted by our developed CONVTEC program by converting the GPS-standard RINEX-ﬁles from the IN- TERNET. Series of elevations θ(t) and azimuths α(t) of the line of sight to the satellite are used to determine the location of subionosphe ric points. In the case under consideration, all results were obtained for larger t han 45◦elevations θ(t). Fig. 4c presents the experimental geometry in the area of ion ospheric station Chilton (RAL) - ⋆, and GPS station HERS ( •). Heavy dots •show the centre line of eclipse at ground level, and smaller dots correspond to its southern and northern boundaries. The symbol ∗shows the position of the subionospheric point at the time of a maximum response of TEC (see below). Various methods for reconstructing the absolute value of TE C are currently under development using measurements of both phase and grou p delays; however, 6eﬀective algorithms for an accurate solution of this proble m are still unavailable for the diﬀerent types of two-frequency receivers and opera ting modes of the GPS system. In this connection, for purposes of this paper, we li mit our attention to considering only those TEC variations which were obtained f rom phase delay measurements by formula (Afraimovich et al., 1998): Ip=1 40.308f2 1f2 2 f2 1−f2 2[(L1λ1−L2λ2) +const +nL] (1) where L1λ1andL2λ2are additional paths of the radio signal caused by the phase delay in the ionosphere, (m); L1andL2represent the number of phase rotations at the frequencies f1andf2;λ1andλ2stand for the corresponding wavelengths, (m); const is the unknown initial phase ambiguity, (m); and nLare errors in determining the phase path, (m). For an approximate speciﬁcation of the TEC constant compone ntI0at time intervals of 2 hours, we made use of the INTERNET data on corre sponding global maps of the absolute vertical value of TEC in the IONEX format (Mannucci, 1998) - see also Fig. 2b. To normalize the response amplitude we converted the ”oblique” TEC to an equivalent ”vertical” value: I(t) =Ip(t)sin(θ(t)) (2) Although, because of a strong horizontal TEC gradient and wi thout regard for the spericity of the problem, this procedure gives a very rough result, but this result is quite acceptable because all our results were obta ined for larger than 45◦ elevations θ(t). With the purpose of eliminating variations of the regular io nosphere, as well as trends introduced by the satellite’s motion, we employ the p rocedure of eliminat- ing the trend by preliminarily smoothing the initial series with the time window in the range from 40 to 100 min which is ﬁtted for each TEC sampl ing. Such a procedure is also required for a clearer identiﬁcation of th e ionospheric response of eclipse which is characterized by a relatively small ampl itude (see below) un- der the presence of space-time TEC variations that are not as sociated with the eclipse. For the purposes of illustration of the data processing proc edure Fig. 5 presents the ﬁltered TEC variations dI(t) for August 11 (thick line), and for the background days of August 10 and 12, 1999 (thin lines) for station HERS for satellite N14 (PRN 14) - c), as well as for stations ZIMM (P RN 1) - b) and WTZT (PRN 14) - a), which are separated from station HERS, res pectively, by 7◦and 13◦in longitude eastward. Figures correspond to GPS satellite numbers. The onset time of the totality phase of eclipse at 300 km altit ude for the cor- responding subionospheric points is shown by vertical soli d lines. As is evident from the ﬁgure, responses to the eclipse at these stations ar e very similar in both form and amplitude, but the response delay increases with th e longitude. dI(t) 7– variations for the background days of August 10 and 12, 1999 for diﬀerent sta- tions diﬀer substantially not only from the TEC response to e clipse but also from one another. Fig. 4b presents the ﬁltered variations of TEC dI(t) for station HERS for PRN 14 during August 11, 1999 (thick line). This panel plots a lso the geo- metrical function of eclipse at 300 km altitude, S(t), that is calculated for the subionospheric point of PRN 14. A minimum value of S(t) corresponds to the point A in the ﬁgure. As is apparent from this ﬁgure, the form of the ﬁltered variat ions is similar to a triangle whose vertex (point B) corresponds to the time a t which the TEC attains its minimum value. The value of dIminitself can serve as an estimate of the amplitude of TEC response to eclipse, and the time inte rval between the times of intersection of the line dI=0 (points C and D) can serve as an estimate of the duration of the response ∆ T. The corresponding delay τbetween the times of the minimum of dIminand of the function S(t) in this case was found to be 4 min, which coincides with the estimate of τfor ionospheric station Chilton (see Section 3). The response amplitude in this case was close to 0 .18 TECU, and the response duration was 46 min. SuchdI(t) – variations are characteristic for all GPS stations and sa tellite numbers 01 and 14 listed in Table 1. The choice of the same sate llites, PRN 01 and PRN 14, for the entire selected set of GPS stations was dic tated by the fact for these satellites a maximum value of the elevation θof the line of sight to the satellite exceeded 45◦for the time interval 10:00-12:30 UT, which reduced to a minimum the possible error of conversion to the ”vertical” v alue of TEC as a consequence of the sphericity. The ﬁrst line of Table 2 presents the results of a statistical processing for the entire set of GPS stations listed in Table 1. The second line i ncludes only those stations whichlie in the immediate vicinity of the eclipse p ath, within ±5◦with respect to the centre line (near zone). In Table 2, the values before the bar are mean values, and those after the bar correspond to the standa rd deviation. The mean value of τfor the entire set of stations is 16 min, while for the station s in the near zone this value is 7 min. The mean value of the ampli tude A=0.3 TECU for all stations and A=0.1 TECU for the near zone. The wid th of the TEC trough for the far and near zones ∆ T= 60 min, on average. Fig. 6 presents a longitudinal dependence of the time positi ontminof minima of the curves dI(t) for subionospheric points lying in the immediate vicinity of the eclipse band (satellites 1 and 14) - heavy dots. Dark symb ols△designate the times of totality phases of the geometrical function of e clipse versus longitude which are calculated for the subionospheric points. Shaded symbols ⋄correspond to delay times between maximum of the geometrical function o f eclipse and a minimum in TEC. It was found that the delay τincreases gradually from 4 min at the Greenwich longitude (10:23 UT, LT) to 16 min at the longitude of 16◦(12:09 LT). 85 Conclusions Our results are in good agreement with earlier measurements and theoretical estimates (see a review of the data in the Introduction). The key feature of our data is a higher reliability of determining the main paramet ers of the response to eclipse which is due to high space-time resolution and to the increased sensitivity of detection of ionospheric disturbances inherent in the GP S-array method which we are using. Also, due regard must be had to the fact that the distinctive p roperty of the eclipse under consideration was a relatively small resp onse amplitude, which required special ﬁltering of the TEC series (see preceding S ection). The rea- son is that, unlike a number of eclipses for which more-or-le ss reliable data were obtained, this eclipse occurred in the summer season charac terized by only mod- erate diﬀerences of the daytime and night-time ionization. Furthermore, in this situation the time variation of f0F2 and vertical TEC near noon usually shows a minimum which, in essence, masks the eclipse eﬀect (see also Fig. 2b). It is also vital to note that the time constant of a decrease in ionizati on in the F2max- imum exceeds substantially the duration of the totality pha se of eclipse, which leads also to a decrease in response amplitude. The local time-dependence of τthat is revealed in this paper is in agreement with theoretical estimates reported in (Stubbe, 1970). The value of τfor foF2, approaching 6 min, corresponded to 13:40 LT. Using modeling methods (Ivelskaya et al., 1977) showed that the variations of the delay time τof minimum local electron density Ne(t) with respect to a minimum of the ion production function are as follows: τ= 1-2 min at 150 km altitude, τ= 3 min at 200 km, τ= 20 min at 300 km, and τ= 45 min above 600 km. In this paper τis estimated, respectively, at about 3 min for 200 km altitude and 20 min for 300 km altitude for 12 LT. 6 Acknowledgements We are grateful to K. S. Palamartchouk, A. V. Tashchilin and A . D. Kalikhman for their interest in this study, helpful advice and active p articipation in discus- sions. Thanks are also due to V. G. Mikhalkosky for his assist ance in preparing the English version of the manuscript. This work was done wit h support from the Russian foundation for Basic Research (grant 99-05-647 53) and RFBR grant of leading scientiﬁc schools of the Russian Federation No. 0 0-15-98509. References 9[1] Afraimovich E. L., Palamartchouk K. S., Perevalova N. P. , and Cher- nukhov V. V., 1998. Ionospheric eﬀects of the solar eclipse o f March 9, 1997, as deduced from GPS data. Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 465–468. [2] Rama Rao P. V. S., 1982. TEC observations at Waltair durin g the total solar eclipse of 16 february 1980 . Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad., 48 , 434–438. [3] Klobuchar J. A., and Malik C., 1970. Comparison of change s in total electron content along three paths. Nature, 226, 1113–1114. [4] Hunter A. N., Holman B. K., Fieldgate D. G. and Kelleher R. , 1974. Faraday rotation studies in Africa during the solar eclipse of June 30, 1973. Nature, 250, 205–206. [5] Essex E. A., Klobuchar J. A., Philbrick C. R. and Leo R., 19 82. Response the total electron content of the ionosphere over North Amer ica to the total solar eclipse of 26 February, 1979. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Ac ad., 48, 444–457. [6] Anastassiadis M. and Matsoukas D., 1970. Electron conte nt measurements by beacon S-66 satellite during May 20, 1966 solar eclipse. J ournal of Atmo- spheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 34, 695–712. [7] Boitman O. N., Kalikhman A. D. and Tashchilin A. V., 2000. The mid- latitude ionosphere during the total solar eclipse of March 9, 1997. Journal Geophysical Research (accepted). [8] Marriott R. T., John D. E. St., Thorne R. M., Venkateswara n S. V., and Mahadevan P., 1972. Ionospheric eﬀects of two recent solar e clipses. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 31, 695–712 . [9] Kang Cheng, Yinn-Nien Huang, Sen-Wen Chen. Ionospheric Eﬀects of Solar Eclipse of September 23, 1987, Around the Equatorial Anomal y Crest Region // Journ. Geophys. Res. 1992. V. 97. N 3. P. 103–111. [10] Klobuchar J. A., 1997. Real-time ionospheric science: The new reality. Radio Science, 32, 1943–1952. [11] Cohen E. A., 1984. The study of the eﬀect of solar eclipse s on the ionosphere based on satellite beacon observations. Radio Science, 19, 769–777. [12] Davies K., 1980. Recent progress in satellite radio bea con studies with partic- ular emphasis on the ATS-6 radio beacon experiment. Space Sc ience Review, 25, 357–430. [13] Espenak F. and Anderson J., 1999. Total solar eclipse of 1999 August 11, NASA Reference Publicftion 1398 // 1999. http://sunearth. gsfs.nasa.gov/ eclipse/TSE1999/TSE1999.html. 10[14] Krinberg I. A. , Tashilin A. B., 1984. Ionosphera and pla smasphera. Moscow: Nauka, p.189. [15] Stubbe P., 1970. The F region during an eclipse – theoret ical study. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 32, 1109–11 16. [16] Singh L., Tyagi T. R., Somayajulu Y. V. et al., 1989. A mul ti-station satel- lite radio beacon study of ionospheric variations during to tal solar eclipses. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 51, 271–278. [17] Ivelskaya M. K., Sutyrina G. E. and Sukhodolskaya V. E., 1977. Modeling the solar eclipse eﬀect in the ionosphere by diﬀerent method s of specifying the electron temperature. Issledovaniya po geomagnetizmu , aeronomii i ﬁzike Solntsa, 41, Moscow: Nauka, 62–65. [18] Deshpande M. R., Chandra H., Sethia G. et al., 1982. Eﬀec ts of the total solar eclipse of 16 February 1980 on TEC at low latitudes. Pro c. Indian. Nat. Sci. Acad., part A, 48, Suppl. N 3., 427–433. [19] Goncharov L. P. and Sitnov Yu. S. 1982. Solar eclipse eﬀe cts over Cuba. Ionosfer. prognoz., Moscow, 169–171. [20] Salah J. E., Oliver W. L., Foster J. C. et al., 1986. Obser vations of the May 30, 1984, annular solar eclipse at Millstone Hill. Journ al Geophysical Research, part A, 91, 1651–1660. [21] Huang C. R. and Liu C. H., 1999. A study of tomographicall y reconstructed ionospheric images during a solar eclipse. Journal Geophys ical Research, 104, 79–94. [22] Mannucci A. J., Ho C. M., Lindqwister U. J. et al., 1998. A global mapping technique for GPS-drived ionospheric TEC measurements. Ra dio Science, 33, 565–582. [23] Zherebtsov G. A., Medvedev A. V., Potekhin A. P., and Shp ynev B. G., 1998a. Ionospheric eﬀects during the March 9, 1997 solar ecl ipse as deduced from observations at the Irkutsk incoherent scatter radar. Issledovaniya po geomagnetizmu, aeronomii i ﬁzike Solntsa, 109, part 1, 46–5 0. [24] Zherebtsov G. A., Klimenko V. V., Klimenko V. I. et al., 1 998b. An investi- gation of the March 9, 1997 solar eclipse eﬀect in the Asian pa rt of Russia. Issledovaniya po geomagnetizmu, aeronomii i ﬁzike Solntsa , 109, part 1, 51– 54. [25] Tsai H. F. and Liu J. Y., 1999. Ionospheric total electro n content response to solar eclipses. Journal Geophysical Research , 104, 657– 668. 11-10 0 10 20 30 4030405060Latitude, deg.Total Solar Eclipse 11.08.99 Chilton (RAL) 9:25 10:20 11:11 12:15 13:11 14:20Longitude, deg. LTFig/. /1 /: Sc hematic map of the Mo on/'s shado w sw eeping through parts of W esternand Cen tral Europ e/. The cen tre line of eclipse at ground lev el is sho wn as a thic kline/, and thin lines corresp ond to the southern and northern b oundaries/. Thesym b ols /+ and / designate the lo cations of GPS stations /- their en tire set /(thesestations w ere used in calculating the parameters app earing in the /rst line ofT able /2/)/. The sym b ols /+ corresp ond to the near zone /(the stations of this groupw ere used in calculating the parameters app earing in the second line of T able/2/)/. The lo cation of ionospheric station Chilton /(RAL/) is sho wn b y /? /. Num b ersfor the longitudes /1/0 /W /0 //, /1/0 /E /, /2/0 /E /, /3/0 /E /, /4/0 /E designate the lo cal time forthese longitudes/.0:004:008:0012:0016:0020:000:00 TIME, UT0369121518212427I 0 , TECU 0:004:008:0012:0016:0020:000:0045678f 0 F 2, MHz Chilton (RAL) 11 August 12 August 10 August11 Augusta. b.Fig/. /2 /: a/) V ariations of the critical frequencies f/0 F /2 o v er the time in terv al/0/0/:/0/0/-/2/4/:/0/0 UT on August /1/1/, /1/9/9/9 according to the data from station Chilton/(RAL/)/. b/) V ariations of the absolute v ertical v alue of TEC for the same timein terv al of August /1/1/, /1/9/9/9 /(thic k line/)/, and for the bac kground da ys of August/1/0 and /1/2 /(thin lines/) /- see text/. The onset time of the totalit y phase of eclipseat /3/0/0 km altitude is sho wn b y a v ertical solid line/.6:009:0012:0015:005678910 6:009:0012:0015:003.54.04.55.05.5 6:009:0012:0015:00 Time, UT150200250300350f 0 F 2, MHz Total Solar Eclipse 11.08.99 f 0 F 1, MHz h' F, km 6:009:0012:0015:00 Time, UT200250300350h' F 2, km 12 10 1112 1110 1012 11 1112 10Chilton (RAL) a. c. b. d.Fig/. /3 /: V ariations of ionospheric parameters during /0/6/:/0/0/-/1/5/:/0/0 UT on August/1/1/, /1/9/9/9 and on the bac kground da ys of August /1/0 and /1/2/, based on the datafrom station Chilton /(RAL/)/. Dots designate the v ariations of critical frequenciesf/0 F /2 /(panel a/)/, f/0 F /1 /(panel c/)/, apparen t heigh ts h /0F /(panel b/)/, and h /0F /2 /(panel d/)/.Solid curv es corresp ond to the same v alues/, but smo othed with the time windo wof /6/0 min /(only smo othed curv es are giv en for August /1/0 and /1/2/)/. The onsettime of the totalit y phase of eclipse at /3/0/0 km altitude is sho wn b y a v erticalsolid line/.-5 0 5 Longitude, deg.485052 HERS, PRN 14HERS Chilton (RAL)9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 Time, UT-0.20.00.2 0.00.10.2I(t), TECU df 0 F 2, MHz 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 Time, UT6.07.0a. b. c.Latitude, deg.0.10.20.3Chilton (RAL) ABC DS(t), relative units S(t), relative unitsAB HERS, PRN 14Fig/. /4 /: a/) V alues of the critical frequency f/0 F /2/, measured on August /1/1/, /1/9/9/9at station Chilton /(RAL/) at time in terv als of /4 min during /0/9/:/0/0/-/1/2/:/0/0 UT /(dots/)/.The solid curv e connecting these dots is an appro ximating one for these v alues/.This panel plots also the geometrical function of eclipse at /3/0/0 km altitude/, S /( t /)/,calculated for station Chilton/. b/) Filtered v ariations of the total electron con ten tdI/(t/) for station HERS /(PRN /1/4/) for August /1/1/, /1/9/9/9 /- the thic k line/. This panelplots also the geometrical function of eclipse at /3/0/0 km altitude/, S /( t /)/, calculatedfor the subionospheric p oin t of PRN /1/4/. c/) Exp erimen tal geometry in the area ofionospheric station Chilton /(RAL/) /- /? /, and for GPS station HERS /( / /)/. Hea vydots sho w the cen ter line of eclipse at ground lev el/, and smaller sym b ols / sho wthe southern and northern b oundaries/. The sym b ol / sho ws the p osition of thesubionospheric p oin t at the time of a maxim um resp onse of TEC/.9:3010:0010:3011:0011:30-0.20.00.2 9:3010:0010:3011:0011:30 Time, UT-0.30.00.3d I(t), TECU 9:3010:0010:3011:0011:30-0.20.00.2a. b. c.WTZT, PRN 14 ZIMM, PRN 1 HERS, PRN 141112 10d I(t), TECU d I(t), TECU 11101212 1110Fig/. /5 /: Filtered v ariations of the total electron con ten t dI /( t /) for August /1/1/(thic k line/)/, and for the bac kground da ys of August /1/0 and /1/2/, /1/9/9/9 /(thin lines/)for station HERS /- a/)/, ZIMM /- b/)/, and WTZT /- c/)/. Figures corresp ond to theGPS satellite n um b ers/. The onset time of the totalit y phase of eclipse at /3/0/0 kmaltitude for corresp onding subionospheric p oin ts is sho wn b y v ertical solid lines/.0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Longitude, deg.10:0010:1210:2410:3610:4811:0011:12Total Solar Eclipse 11.08.99 Time, UT τ,min 18 12 6 0Fig/. /6 /: Longitudinal dep endence of the time p osition of minima of the curv edI /( t /) for the stations in the near zone /- hea vy dots / /. The sym b ols /4 designatethe v ariations of the totalit y phase of eclipse at /3/0/0 km altitude for subionosphericp oin ts as a function of longitude/. The sym b ols / plot the longitudinal dep endenceof the dela y / of the TEC resp onse dI /( t /)/.T able /1/: GPS site names and lo cationsN SITE Geograph/.latitude Geograph/.longitude N SITE Geograph/.latitude Geograph/.longitude/1 BELL /4/1/./6/0/0 /1/./4/0/1 /2/9 MADR /4/0/./4/2/9 /4/./2/5/0/2 BOR/1 /5/2/./2/7/7 /1/7/./0/7/3 /3/0 MA TE /4/0/./6/4/9 /1/6/./7/0/4/3 BRST /4/8/./3/8/0 /-/4/./4/9/6 /3/1 MD V O /5/6/./0/2/7 /3/7/./2/2/3/4 BR US /5/0/./7/9/8 /4/./3/5/9 /3/2 MEDI /4/4/./5/2/0 /1/1/./6/4/7/5 BSHM /3/2/./7/7/9 /3/5/./0/2/3 /3/3 MEEU /5/1/./1/0/6 /5/./5/5/6/6 BZR G /4/6/./4/9/9 /1/1/./3/3/7 /3/4 MEMB /5/0/./5/9/0 /5/./9/7/7/7 CA GL /3/9/./1/3/6 /8/./9/7/3 /3/5 METS /6/0/./2/1/7 /2/4/./3/9/5/8 COSE /3/9/./2/0/1 /1/6/./3/1/0 /3/6 MOPI /4/8/./3/7/2 /1/7/./2/7/4/9 CREU /4/2/./3/1/9 /3/./3/1/6 /3/7 NOTO /3/6/./8/7/6 /1/4/./9/9/0/1/0 DENT /5/0/./9/3/4 /3/./4/0/0 /3/8 OBER /4/8/./0/8/6 /1/1/./2/8/0/1/1 DOUR /5/0/./0/9/5 /4/./5/9/5 /3/9 P A TK /4/7/./2/0/8 /1/1/./4/6/0/1/2 EBRE /4/0/./8/2/1 /0/./4/9/2 /4/0 PF AN /4/7/./5/1/5 /9/./7/8/5/1/3 GENO /4/4/./4/1/9 /8/./9/2/1 /4/1 RAMO /3/0/./5/9/8 /3/4/./7/6/3/1/4 GILB /3/2/./4/7/9 /3/5/./4/1/6 /4/2 RIGA /5/6/./9/4/9 /2/4/./0/5/9/1/5 GLSV /5/0/./3/6/4 /3/0/./4/9/7 /4/3 SBGZ /4/7/./8/0/3 /1/3/./1/1/0/1/6 GOPE /4/9/./9/1/4 /1/4/./7/8/6 /4/4 SFER /3/6/./4/6/4 /6/./2/0/6/1/7 GRAA /4/7/./0/6/7 /1/5/./4/9/3 /4/5 SJD V /4/5/./8/7/9 /4/./6/7/7/1/8 GRAS /4/3/./7/5/5 /6/./9/2/1 /4/6 TELA /3/2/./0/6/8 /3/4/./7/8/1/1/9 GRAZ /4/7/./0/6/7 /1/5/./4/9/3 /4/7 TORI /4/5/./0/6/3 /7/./6/6/1/2/0 HERS /5/0/./8/6/7 /0/./3/3/6 /4/8 TOUL /4/3/./5/6/1 /1/./4/8/1/2/1 HFLK /4/7/./3/1/3 /1/1/./3/8/6 /4/9 UP AD /4/5/./4/0/7 /1/1/./8/7/8/2/2 JOZE /5/2/./0/9/7 /2/1/./0/3/1 /5/0 VENE /4/5/./4/3/7 /1/2/./3/3/1/2/3 KABR /3/3/./0/2/2 /3/5/./1/4/5 /5/1 W ARE /5/0/./6/9/0 /5/./2/4/5/2/4 KARL /4/9/./0/1/1 /8/./4/1/1 /5/2 WSR T /5/2/./9/1/5 /6/./6/0/4/2/5 KA TZ /3/2/./9/9/5 /3/5/./6/8/8 /5/3 WTZR /4/9/./1/4/4 /1/2/./8/7/9/2/6 K OSG /5/2/./1/7/8 /5/./8/1/0 /5/4 WTZT /4/9/./1/4/4 /1/2/./8/7/9/2/7 LAMA /5/3/./8/9/2 /2/0/./6/7/0 /5/5 ZIMM /4/6/./8/7/7 /7/./4/6/5/2/8 LAMP /3/5/./5/0/0 /1/2/./6/0/6T able /2 /: The ionospheric parameters of total solareclipse of august /1/1/, /1/9/9/9N Num b er ofsubionosphericp oin ts A/,TECU / T /,min / /,min/1 /9/8 /0/./2/9/8 // /0/./1/9/7 /6/2 // /3/2 /1/6/./4 // /1/4/2 /1/9 /0/./1/9/3 // /0/./0/8/1 /6/1 // /3/6 /8 // /4
arXiv:physics/0007025v1 [physics.pop-ph] 10 Jul 2000TIFR/TH/00-37 Basic Constituents of the Visible and Invisible Matter — A Mi croscopic View of the Universe D.P. Roy Department of Theoretical Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai - 400 005, India Abstract One of the greatest achievements of twentieth century physi cs is the discovery of a very close link between the microcosm and the macrocosm. This fol lows from the two basic principles of quantum mechanics and relativity, the uncert ainty principle and the mass energy equivalence, along with the standard big bang model of cosmo logy. As we probe deeper into the microcosm we encounter states of higher mass and energy, which were associated with the early history of the universe. Thus discovery of the atomic n ucleus followed by the nuclear particles, quarks & gluons and ﬁnally the W&Zbosons have recreated in the laboratory the forms of matter that abounded in the very early universe. Thi s has helped us to trace back the history of the universe to within a nanosecond of its crea tion. Finally the discovery of the Higgs and supersymmetric particles will help to solve th e mystry of the invisible matter, which abound throughout the universe today, as relics of tha t early history. 1Introduction Our concept of the basic constituents of matter has undergon e two revolutionary changes during the twentieth century. The ﬁrst was the Rutherford sc attering experiment of 1911, bombarding Alpha particles on the Gold atom. While most of th em passed through straight, occasionally a few were deﬂected at very large angles. This w as like shooting bullets at a hay stack and ﬁnding that occasionally one would be deﬂected at a large angle and hit a bystander or in Rutherford’s own words “deﬂected back and hi t you on the head”! This would mean that there is a hard compact object hiding in the ha y stack. Likewise the Rutherford scattering experiment showed the atom to consis t of a hard compact nucleus, serrounded by a cloud of electrons. The nucleus was found lat er to be made up of protons and neutrons. The second was the electron-proton scattering experiment o f 1968 at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Centre, which was awarded the Nobel Prize in 199 0. This was essentially a repeat of the Rutherford scattering type experiment, but at a much higher energy. The result was also similar as illustrated below. It was again cl ear from the pattern of large angle scattering that the proton is itself made up of three compact objects called quarks. Fig. 1. The SLAC electron-proton scattering experiment, re vealing the quark structure of the proton. We now know from many such experiments that the nuclear parti cles (proton, neutron and mesons) are all made up of quarks – i.e. they are all quark atom s. The main diﬀerence between the two experiments comes from th e fact that, while the dimension of the atom is typically 1 A◦= 10−10m that of the proton is about 1 fm (fermi or femtometer) = 10−15m. It follows from the famous Uncertainty Principle of Quant um Mechanics, ∆E·∆x >¯hc∼0.2 GeV .fm, (1) that the smaller the distance you want to probe the higher mus t be the beam energy. Thus probing inside the proton ( x≪1 fm) requires a beam energy E≫1 GeV(109eV), which is the energy acquired by the electron on passing through a bi llion (Gega) volts. It is this multi-GeV acceleration technology that accounts for the ha lf a century gap between the two experiments. 2It is customary in quantum physics to use the so called natura l units, where one sets both the Plank’s constant ¯ hand the velocity of light cequal to unity. Thus the mass of particle is same as its rest mass energy ( mc2). The GeV is commonly used as the basic unit of mass, energy and momentum. The proton mass is nearly 1 GeV. The Standard Model : As per our present understanding the basic constituents of m atter are a dozen of spin- 1/2 particles (in units of ¯ h) called fermions, along with their antiparticles. These ar e the three pairs of leptons (electron, muon, tau and their associ ated neutrinos) and three pairs of quarks (up, down, strange, charm, bottom and top) as shown below. The masses of the heaviest members are shown paranthetically in GeV units. Basic Constituents of Matter νeνµντ 0 leptons e µ τ (2) -1 u c t (175) 2 /3 quark d s b (5)−1/3 The members of each pair diﬀer by 1 unit of electric charge as s hown in the last column – i.e. charge 0 and -1 for the neutrinos and charged leptons and 2/3 and -1/3 for the upper and lower quarks. This is relevant for their weak interactio n. Apart from this electric charge the quarks also possess a new kind of charge called colour cha rge. This is relevant for their strong interaction, which binds them together inside the nu clear particles. There are four basic interactions among these particles – st rong, electromagnetic, weak and gravitational. Apart from gravitation, which is too wea k to have any perceptible eﬀect, the other three are all gauge interactions. They are all medi ated by spin 1 (vector) particles called gauge bosons, whose interactions are completely spe ciﬁed by the corresponding gauge groups. 3Basic Interactions Interaction Strong EM Weak Carrier g γ W±&Z0 Gauge Group SU(3) U(1)SU(2)/bracehtipupleft /bracehtipdownright/bracehtipdownleft /bracehtipupright The strong interaction between quarks is mediated by the exc hange of a massless vector boson called gluon. This is analogous to the photon, which me diates the electromagnetic interaction between charged particles (quarks or charged l eptons). The gluon coupling is proportional to the colour charge just like the photon coupl ing is proportional to the electric charge. The constant of proportionality for the strong inte raction is denoted by αsin analogy with the ﬁne structure constant αin the EM case, as shown in equations (2) and (3) below. And the theory of strong interaction is called quantum chrom odynamics (QCD) in analogy with the quantum electrodynamics (QED). The major diﬀerenc e of QCD with respect to the QED arises from the nonabelian nature of its gauge group, SU(3). This essentially means that unlike the electric charge the colour charge can t ake three possible directions in an abstract space. These are rather whimsically labelled re d, blue and yelow as illustrated below. Of course the cancellation of the colour charges of qu arks ensure that the nuclear particles composed of them are colour neutral just like the a toms are electrically neutral. ub dyur dyururur db ur_sr_πο p+k+n Fig. 2. The quark structure of proton, neutron, πandKmesons along with their colour charges (the bar denotes antiparticles and the subscripts d enote colour charge). A dramatic consequence of the nonabelian nature of the QCD is that the gluons them- selves carry colour charge and hence have self-interaction unlike the photons, which have no electric charge and hence no self-interaction. Because of t he gluon self-interaction the colour lines of forces between the quarks are squeezed into a tube as illustrated below. 4ubdyp+ e_ r r Fig. 3. The squeezed (1-dimentional) lines of force between colour charges contrasted with the isotropic (3-dimentional) lines of force between elect ric charges. Consequently the number of colour lines of force intercepte d and the resulting force is con- stant, i.e. the potential increases linearly with distance VS=αsr. (2) Thus the quarks are perpetually conﬁned inside the nuclear p articles as it would cost an inﬁnite ammount of energy to split them apart. In contrast th e isotropic distribution of the electric lines of force implies that the number intercep ted and hence the resulting force decreases like 1 /r2, i.e. the potential VE=α r. (3) Finally the weak interaction is mediated by massive vector p articles, the charged W± and the neutral Z0bosons, which couple to all the quarks and leptons. The forme r couples to each pair of quarks and leptons listed above with a univers al coupling strength αW, since they all belong to the doublet representation of SU(2) (i.e. carry the same gauge charge). Because of the mass of the exchanged particle MWthe weak interaction is restricted to a short range of 1 /MW, i.e. VW=αW re−rMW. (4) One can understand this easily from the uncertainty princip le (1), since the exchange of a massive Wboson implies a tansient energy nonconservation ∆ E=MWc2, corresponding to a range ∆ x= ¯h/M Wc. The weak and the electromagnetic interactions have been suc cessfully uniﬁed into a SU(2)×U(1) gauge theory. This is the famous electroweak theory of Gl ashow, Salam and Weinberg for which they were awarded the 1979 Nobel Prize. Th is theory predicts the W andZboson masses from the relative rates of the weak and the elect romagnetic interactions, i.e. MW= 80 GeV and MZ= 91 GeV . (5) 5Discovery of the Fundamental Particles As mentioned earlier, the up and down quarks are the constitu ents of proton and neutron. Together with the electron they constitute all the visible m atter of the universe. The heavier quarks and charged leptons all decay into the lighter ones vi a weak interaction analogous to the nuclear Beta decay. So they are not freely occurring in nature. But they can be produced in laboratory or cosmic ray experiments. The muon a nd the strange quark were discovered in cosmic ray experiments in the late forties, th e latter in the form of Kmeson. Next to come were the neutrinos. Although practically massl ess and stable the neutrinos are hard to detect because they interact only weakly with mat ter. The νewas discovered in atomic reactor experiment in 1956, for which Reines got th e Nobel Prize in 1995. The νµwas discovered in the Brookhaven proton synchrotron in 1962 , for which Lederman and Steinberger got the Nobel Prize in 1988. The ﬁrst cosmic ray o bservation of neutrino came in 1965, when the νµwas detected in the Kolar Gold Field experiment. The rest of the particles have all been discovered during the last 25 years, thanks to the advent of the electron-positron and the antiproton-proton colliders. First came the windfall of the seventies with a quick succession of discoveries main ly at the e+e−colliders: charm quark (1974), Tau lepton (1975), bottom quark (1977) and the gluon (1979). This was followed by the discovery of WandZbosons (1983) and ﬁnally the top quark (1995) at the ¯ppcolliders. Richter and Ting got the Nobel prize for the disco very of charm quark, while Martin Pearl got it for the Tau Lepton and Carlo Rubbia for the WandZbosons. Fig. 4. Production of charm quark, tau lepton, bottom quark a nd gluon at the e+e− collider (upper line) and WandZbosons at the ¯ ppcollider (lower line). Fig. 4 illustrates the pair production of charm and bottom qu arks as well as the tau lepton 6at the electron-positron collider. The typical life time of these particles is of the order of a picosecond (10−12sec.), corresponding to a range of a few hundred microns (fra ction of a milli meter) at relativistic energies. Thanks to the high re solution silicon detectors available now, one can identify these particles before they decay. On t he other hand the WandZ bosons, being very heavy, decay practically at the instant o f their creation. Nontheless they can be recognised by the unmistakable imprints they leave be hind in their decay products. The same is true about top quark production (not shown). Thus we have seen all the basic constituents of matter and the carriers of their interactions by now. But the story is not yet complete because of the mass pr oblem – i.e. how to give mass to the weak gauge bosons (and also matter fermions) without b reaking the gauge symmetry of the Lagrangian. Mass Problem (Higgs Boson) : It is a remarkable property of gauge theory that the interact ion dynamics is completely determined by the symmetry of the Lagrangian under the gauge transformation – i.e. ro- tation in some abstract space deﬁned by the gauge group. This is similar to the rotational symmetry of the Lagrangian in ordinary space, leading to the conservation of angular mo- mentum, except that in this case you assume the rotation angl es to vary from point to point (i.e. be localised). Then it predicts not only the conservat ion of gauge charges but also the presence of massless vector particles (gauge bosons) along with their couplings to the matter fermions. But the mass term of the gauge bosons (as well as tho se of the matter fermions) can be easily seen to break the gauge symmetry of the Lagrangi an. On the other hand the scalar (spin-0) particle masses are symmetric under gau ge transformation. This can be exploited to give mass to the weak gauge bosons as well as the m atter fermions through the back door – i.e. they acquire mass by absorbing scalar partic les (like a snake acquiring mass by swallowing a frog). This is the famous Higgs mechanism. One assumes a scalar part icle of negative mass square, i.e. imaginary mass. This leads to a spontaneous sym metry breaking – i.e. the ground state of energy is not symmetric under gauge transfor mation unlike the Lagrangian. As a result the gauge bosons, WandZ, can acquire mass. Besides the physical scalar particle acquires a real mass, comparable to WandZmasses. This is the so called Higgs boson, whose detection will conﬁrm this mechanism of generating pa rticle masses. It may be noted here that one can have a consistent gauge theory of electrowe ak interaction in the presence of spontaneous symmetry breaking, since the Lagrangian ret ains the gauge symmetry. This was demonstrated by t’Hooft and Veltman in the early seventi es, for which they got the Nobel prize last year. There are many examples of spontaneous symmetry breaking in physics, the most familiar one being that of magnetism. At high temperature the electro n spins of a Ferromagnet are randomly oriented. But as we cool it below a critical tempera ture the electron spins get alligned with one another because that corresponds to a lowe r state of energy (ground state). Thus while the Lagrangian posseses a rotational symmetry, t his is not shared by the ground state. The same thing happens in the Higgs mechanism, except that the rotation is to be done in an abstract space instead of the ordinary space. 7The Standard Model of Cosmology : A phase transition similar to the Ferromagnetic one had take n place soon after the big bang, when the universe was only about a nanosecond (10−9sec.) old and its radius ( ct) only about 30 cm. It was an extremely hot and dense ﬁre ball, with an ambient temperature of about 100 GeV. Now the eﬀective mass of a particle depends on t he property of the medium. And as the universe cooled down below a critical temperature the eﬀective squared mass of the scalar particle became negative, resulting in a spontan eous breaking of the electroweak symmetry. At this stage the WandZbosons acquired mass along with the quarks and the leptons. The life time of the universe varies inversely a s the square of its temperature. By the time the universe was a few microsecond (10−6sec.) old, and its radius a few km, the ambient temperature had dropped to about 1 GeV and all the WandZbosons had decayed along with the heavy quarks and leptons into the ligh t ones. At this stage a second (QCD) phase transition took place, which conﬁned the light q uarks ( uandd) into protons and neutrons. It may be noted here that the ongoing heavy ion c ollision experiments are trying to recreate such a QCD phase transition in the laborat ory; and there are already some early indications of success. By the time the universe was a few minutes (102sec.) old the temperature had dropped to a few MeV, which is the typical binding energy of nuclei. At this stage Helium and other light nuclei were formed. After about one lakh (105) years the temperature dropped down to the atomic binding energy level of a few electron volts. At th is stage the electrons combined with the nuclei to form neutral atoms. Thus the matter decoup led from radiation and the universe became transparent. After this the matter particl es experienced the gravitational attraction resulting ﬁnally in the formation of galaxies an d stars. The present age of the universe is about 15 billion years and the ambient temperatu re about 3 K (1 eV = 12000 K). Hierarchy Problem (Supersymmetry) : But this is not the end of the story because of the so called hie rarchy problem – i.e. how to control the Higgs boson mass in the mass range of WandZbosons (around a hundred GeV)? This is because the scalar particle mass has a quadratically divergent quantum correction unlike the fermion and gauge boson masses, since it is not pro tected by any symmetry. Thanks to the uncertainty principle, the vacuum in quantum m echanics is not empty, but it can contain an unlimited amount of energy and matter. And t he quantum correction represents the eﬀect of this medium on the mass of a particle. Being a divergent eﬀect it would push up the scalar particle mass to inﬁnity (or a very hi gh cutoﬀ scale of the theory). So the question is how to keep it down in the desired mass range ofWandZbosons? That the scalar mass is not protected by any symmetry was of co urse used above to give mass to gauge bosons and fermions via Higgs mechanism. The hi erarchy problem encountered now is the ﬂip side of the same coin. The most attractive solut ion is to invoke a protecting symmetry – i.e. the supersymmetry (SUSY), which is a symmetr y between fermions and bosons. As per SUSY all the fermions of the Standard Models ha ve bosonic Superpartners and vice versa. They are listed below along with their spins S, where the Superpartners are indicated by tilde. The presence of the Superpartners ensur e cancellation of the divergent 8quantum corrections. quarks & leptons SGauge bosons SHiggs SR-parity q, ℓ 1/2 γ, g, W, Z 1 h 0 +1 ˜q,˜ℓ 0 ˜γ,˜g,˜W,˜Z 1/2 ˜h 1/2 -1 The standard particles are distinguished from the supersym metric ones by a multiplicative quantum number called R-parity, which is +1 for the former and −1 for the latter. Thus the supersymmetric particles have to be produced in pair and the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) has to be stable for R-parity conservation. In most SUSY models the LSP is the photino ˜ γ, or in general mixture of ˜ γand˜Z, with a mass of again about a hundred GeV. Thus it interacts only weakly with matter and hence hard to detect like the neutrino. Indeed the LSP is the leading candidate for constituting the invisible or dark matter of the universe, which will be the last topic of this article. The Invisible (Dark) Matter : There is a large number of indirect evidences suggesting tha t the bulk of the matter of the universe is invisible or dark – i.e. it has gravitational but no electromagnetic interaction! The strongest evidence comes from the rotational velocity o f the isolated stars or hydrogen cloud on the outskirts of galaxies. One can predict this velo city by balancing the centrifugal acceleration with the gravitational one, v2 rot r=GNM(r) r2,i.e. vrot=/radicalBigg GNM(r) r, (6) where ris the distance of the tracer star from the galactic centre an dM(r) is the galactic mass enclosed within this distance. Fig. 5 shows the rotatio n curve for a nearby dwarf spiral galaxy M33, superimposed on the optical image. If there were no galactic matter outside the visible disk the rotation velocity curve would have gone dow n like 1 /√r. Instead it continues to rise towards a constant value, way beyond the visible disk , suggesting that there is a lot of invisible matter in and around the galaxy. Similar rotati on curves have been observed for about a thousand galaxies, including our own. And they sugge st the mass of the invisible matter to be a over an order of magnitude larger than the mass o f visible matter. 9Fig. 5. observed rotation curve of the nearby dwarf spiral ga laxy M33, superimposed on its optical image (adopted from E. Corbelli and P. Salucci, astr o-ph/9909252, 1999). The invisible mass could of course come from nonluminous bod ies like small stars or Jupitor, which are more aptly described as dark rather than i nvisible matter. But such objects act as gravitational lense, which distort the image of distant stars lying behind them by gravitational bending of light. And it is clear from t hese gravitational lensing experiments that such massive compact objects can not be a ma jor source of the invisible matter. The contribution from gas is also very small. In prin ciple the neutrinos could constitute the invisible matter; but their masses are too sm all to account for the required density of invisible matter. The leading candidate for this is the lightest supersymmetric particles (LSP), which are weakly interacting like the neut rino but carry a mass of about a hundred GeV. These particles were in thermal equillibrium withW,Zand Higgs bosons along with the quarks and leptons when the universe had a temp erature of about a hundred GeV. But as the temperature dropped by about an order of magni tude, the density of LSP came down to a level, where their annihilation rate could not keep up with the expansion rate of the universe. The latter took them away from one anoth er before they could mutually annihilate. Thus the total mass of the LSPs at this (freeze ou t) temperature has remained the same ever since. Indeed this scenario predicts the right size of the invisible matter density we observe today. Presumably these invisible particles played a pioneering r ole in galaxy formation. Being neutral particles they would have experienced gravitation al attraction long before the forma- tion of neutral atoms, when the ordinary matter started expe riencing this attraction. Thus it is quite plausible that the local concentrations of invis ible matter had already formed by the time of formation of the neutral atoms, to which the latte r were gravitationally attracted to form the galaxies. Indeed such a scenario of structure for mation is supported by strong observational evidence. 10Thus the invisible matter is a very important component of th e universe. There are multiprong experimental eﬀorts for detection of these invi sible particles. Extremely high precission detectors are being set up in deep underground ex periments to record their inter- action with ordinary matter by measuring the recoil energy o f the target nuclei. A square kilometer size neutrino telescope is being setup in the pola r ice cap of Antartica to look for the high energy neutrinos coming from the pair annihilation of these invisible particles, a large concentration of which is gravitationally trapped at the solar core. Most importantly a large proton-proton collider of 27 km circumfurence is bei ng built by an international collaboration near Geneva to produce these particles in the laboratory by recreating the extremely high temperature and energy density, that existe d after a nanosecond of the big bang. Assuming these invisible particles to be the LSP one ca n be reasonably conﬁdent of producing them at this collider along with the Higgs boson. T hus one hopes to ﬁnally solve the mystry of the invisible matter of the universe as well as t o understand how the visible matter acquires mass. 11
arXiv:physics/0007026v1 [physics.geo-ph] 10 Jul 2000The GPS global detection of the ionospheric response to sola r ﬂares Afraimovich E. L. Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SD RAS, p. o. box 4026, Irkutsk, 664033, Russia fax: +7 3952 462557; e-mail: afra@iszf.irk.ru Abstract This author suggests the concept of a new technology for glob al detection (GLOBDET) of atmospheric disturbances of natural and technogenic origi n, on the basis of phase measurements of the total electron content (TEC) in the ionosphere using a n international GPS network. Temporal dependencies of TEC are obtained for a set of spaced receivers of the GPS network simultaneously for the entire set of ”visible” (over a given time interval) GPS satellites (up to 5-10 satellites). These series are subjected to ﬁltering in the selected range of oscillation periods using algorithms for spatio-temporal analysis of signals o f non-equidistant GPS phased antenna arrays which are adequate to the detected disturbance. An an alysis is made of the possibilities of using the GLOBDET when detecting the ionospheric respons e of solar ﬂares. In this case it is best to make the coherent summation of the ﬁltered series of T EC. A powerful impulsive ﬂares of July 29, 1999 and December 28, 1999 were chosen to illustra te the practical implementation of the proposed method. 1 Introduction The advent and evolution of a Global Positioning System, GPS , and also the creation on its basis of widely branched networks of GPS stations (at least 700 sit es at the May of 2000, the data from which are placed on the INTERNET) opened up a new era in remote ionospheric sensing [13]. Furthermore, there exist also powerful regional networks s uch as the Geographical Survey Institute network in Japan [17] consisting of up to 1000 receivers. Hig h-precision measurements of the group and phase delay along the line-of-sight (LOS) between the re ceiver on the ground and transmitters on the GPS system satellites covering the reception zone are made using two-frequency multichannel receivers of the GPS system at almost any point of the globe an d at any time simultaneously at two coherently coupled frequencies f1= 1575 .42 MHz and f2= 1227 .60 MHz. The sensitivity of phase measurements in the GPS system is su ﬃcient for detecting irregularities with an amplitude of up to 10−3–10−4of the diurnal TEC variation. This makes it possible to formulate the problem of detecting ionospheric disturbanc es from diﬀerent sources of artiﬁcial and natural origins. Anthropogenic sources of ionospheric dis turbances include nuclear events, chemical explosions, and rocket launches. Among natural sources are solar eclipses, solar ﬂares, earthquakes, volcanoes, heavy thunderstorms, and auroral heating. Stud ies of these phenomena are of great importance both for a scientiﬁc understanding of their gene sis and propagation in the atmosphereand as a tool for detecting such sources in remote regions; fo r instance, the GLONASS system provides more eﬀective coverage at high latitudes [13]. Recently some authors embarked actively on the development of detection tools for the ionospheric response of powerful earthquakes [3], rocket launches [4], and industrial surface explosions [9]; [5]. Subsequetly, the GPS data began to be used in the context of th e spaced-receiver method using three GPS stations to determine the parameters of the full wave vec tor of traveling ionospheric disturbances under quiet and disturbed geomagnetic conditions [1]; [2]. The limitations of the spaced-receiver method with a minimu m necessary number of receivers (three) include their low sensitivity and inadequate spati al selectivity, and this gives no way of exploiting the potential of a global GPS system consisting o f hundreds of GPS stations. Next in turn is the setting of a more general problem, namely, that of developing processing techniques for the data from the GPS and GLONASS systems, based on the latest achievements in the ﬁeld of a comprehensive spatio-temporal processing of signals, wi th due regard for the special features of ionospheric disturbances, however. The objective of this paper is to develop the concept of a glob al detector (GLOBDET) of at- mosperic disturbances of natural and technogenic origins, based on phase measurements of total electron content (TEC) in the ionosphere using the internat ional network of two-frequency multi- channel receivers of the GPS system - section 2. Section 3 dis cusses the possibilities of using the GLOBDET method in detecting ionospheric eﬀects of solar ﬂar es. Basic characteristics of such a detector (sensitivity and time resolution) are examined in Section 4. The practical implementation of the method is illustrated by analyzing a global ionospher ic response to a powerful solar ﬂares of July 29, 1999 and December 28, 1999 (Sections 5 and 6). Sectio n 7 discusses the ﬁndings and explores the possibilities of utilizing a global GPS networ k in detecting other kinds of atmospheric disturbances of natural and technogenic origins. 2 Using the data from a global GPS network in the context of the ideology of a phased antenna array Phased antenna arrays (FAA) are extensively used in radiolo cation, sonar systems, and in processing seismic signals as systems featuring high sensitivity in si gnal detection and high spatial selectivity which is necessary for localizing signal sources. There exi st quite varied schemes for hardware and software realization of FAA [6]. In general case the treatme nt of signals imply multiplying a complex signal ˜A(t)iof each of the i–spaced FAA elements by a complex factor ˜Kiwith the subsequent coherent summation of the resulting products ˜S=N/summationdisplay i=1˜A(t)i˜Ki (1) where ˜Sis the result of the coherent summation; iis the FAA element number; and i=1, 2, ... N. By specifying diﬀerent values of ˜Ki, which in each particular case depend on the conditions of th e problem being solved, it is possible to specify parameters d etermining the sensitivity and selectivity of FAA. This author suggests the concept of a global detector (GLOBD ET) of atmospheric disturbances of natural and technogenic origins, based on processing the GPS data in the FAA conﬁguration. This concept implies that time dependencies of TEC are obtained f or a set of spaced receivers of the GPS network simultaneously for all GPS satellites ”visible” du ring a given time interval. These series aresubjected to ﬁltering over a selected range of oscillation p eriods in order to eliminate slow variations caused by the orbital motion of the satellites and by the diur nal variation of TEC in the ionosphere. Next, these series are processed in the nonequidistant FAA c onﬁguration using them in (1) or in other algorithms of PAA as complex signals ˜A(t)i. It is also assumed that equivalent partial antennas of such an array are located at subionospheric points. The co ordinates of these points are determined for the selected height hmaxof the F2-layer maximum by means of standard (in the GPS system) calculations of the azimuth αand elevation θof the LOS between the receiver and the satellite. α andθare reckoned from the northward direction and from the groun d, respectively. The GPS technology provides the means of estimating TEC vari ations on the basis of phase measurements of TEC Iin each of the spaced two-frequency GPS receivers using the f ormula [11]; [4]: I=1 40.308f2 1f2 2 f2 1−f2 2[(L1λ1−L2λ2) +const +nL] (2) where L1λ1andL2λ2are phase path increments of the radio signal, caused by the p hase delay in the ionosphere (m); L1,L2is the number of full phase rotations, and λ1, andλ2, are the wavelengths (m) for the frequencies f1andf2, respectively; const is some unknown initial phase path (m); and nLis the error in determination of the phase path (m). The TEC unit, TECU , which is equal to 1016m−2and is commonly accepted in the literature, will be used throughout the text. 3 Using the GLOBDET technology in detecting the iono- spheric response to solar ﬂares The enhancement of X-ray and ultraviolet radiation intensi ty that is observed during chromospheric ﬂares on the Sun immediately causes an increase in electron d ensity in the ionosphere. These density variatiuons are diﬀerent for diﬀerent altitudes and are col lectively called Sudden Ionospheric Distur- bances (SID). SID observations provide a key means for groun d-based detection of solar ﬂares along with optical observations of ﬂares and solar radio burst obs ervations. Much research is devoted to SID studies, among them a number of thorough reviews and mono graphs [16]. SID data for the F-region acquired by diﬀerent radio probing methods were use d repeatedly to estimate time variations in the X-ray and extreme ultraviol et (EUV) spectral regions and in relative measurements of ﬂuxes in diﬀerent wavelength ranges [8]; [1 8]; [15]. The main body of SID data for the Earth’s upper atmosphere was obtained in earlier detect ions of Sudden Frequency Deviations (SFD) of the F-region-reﬂected radio signal in the HF range [7]; [8]. A further, highly informative, technique is the method of in coherent scatter (IS) [18]. However, the practical implementation of the IS method requires very sophisticated, expensive equipment. An added limitation is inadequate time resolution. Since the r elaxation time of electron density in the E- and F1-regions is also less than 5-10 min, most IS measurements la ck time resolution needed for the study of inospheric eﬀects of ﬂares. The eﬀect of solar ﬂares on the ionospheric F-region is also m anifested as a Sudden Increase of Total Electron Content (SITEC) which was measured previous ly using continuously operating radio beacons on geostationary satellites [15]. A serious limita tion of methods based on analyzing VHF signals from geostationary satellites is their small and ev er increasing with the time number and the nonuniform distribution in longitude.Consequently, none of the above-mentioned existing method s can serve as an eﬀective basis for the radio detection system to provide a continuous, global S ID monitoring with adequate space- time resolution. Furthermore, the creation of these facili ties requires developing special-purpose equipment, including powerful radio transmitters contami nating the radio environment. It is also signiﬁcant that when using the existing methods, the inadeq uate spatial aperture gives no way of deducing the possible spatial inhomogeneity of the X-ray an d EUV ﬂux. According to the above concept, a global GPS network can be su ccessfully used as a global detector of the ionospheric response to solar ﬂares. A physical groun dwork for the method is formed by the eﬀect of fast change in electron density in the Earth’s ionos phere at the time of a ﬂare simultaneously on the entire sunlit surface. Essentially, the method implies using appropriate ﬁlterin g and a coherent processing of TEC variations in the ionosphere simultaneously for the entire set of ”visible” (during a given time interval) GPS satellites (as many as 5-10 satellites) at all global GPS network stations used in the analysis. In detecting solar ﬂares, the ionospheric response is virtual ly simultaneous for all stations on the dayside of the globe within the time resolution range of the GPS recei vers (from 30 s to 0.1 s). Therefore, the coherent addition of individual realizations ˜A(t)idoes not require a partial phase shift (the complex part of the term ˜Kiis zero), and the entire procedure reduces to a simple additi on ˜S=N/summationdisplay i=1˜A(t)iKi (3) where ˜A(t)irepresents ﬁltered TEC variations, and Kiis the amplitude weighting factor deter- mined by the geometry of the i-beam (LOS) to the satellite. To a ﬁrst approximation, this f actor is [12]. Ki=cos/bracketleftbigg arcsin/parenleftbiggRz Rz+hmaxcosθ i/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg (4) where Rzis the Earth’s radius; hmax= 300 is the height of the F2–layer maximum. Reconstructing the absolute value of the ionospheric respo nse to the solar ﬂare requires a more accurate (than used in this paper) conversion of the ”obliqu e” TEC value to a ”vertical” one, espe- cially at low values of elevations of the beam to the satellit e. To do this, it is necessary not only to eliminate, for this beam to the satellite, the ambiguity o f the determination of the absolute TEC value which arises when only phase measurements are used in t he GPS system. The response can only be estimated reliable, with the inclusion the spatiall y inhomogeneous ionosphere, by using all beams to the satellite, and by applying adequate methods of s patial interpolation. This problem is considered in a series of publications (for example, [14]) a nd is beyond the scope of this paper. 4 Characteristics of a global detector The detection sensitivity is determined by the ability to de tect typical signals of the ionospheric response to a solar ﬂare (leading edge duration, period, for m, length) at the level of TEC background ﬂuctuations. Ionospheric irregularities are characteriz ed by a power spectrum, so that background ﬂuctuations will always be distinguished in the frequency r ange of interest. However, background ﬂuctuations are not correlated in the case of beams to the sat ellite spaced by an amount exceeding the typical irregularity size. With a typical length of X-ray bursts and EUV emission of sola r ﬂares of about 5-10 min, the corresponding ionization irregularity size does normally not exceed 30-50 km; hence the condition ofa statistical independence of TEC ﬂuctuations at spaced bea ms is almost always satisﬁed. Therefore, coherent summation of responses to a ﬂare on a set of beams spa ced thoughout the dayside of the globe permits the solar ﬂare eﬀect to be detected even when th e response amplitude on partial beams is markedly smaller than the noise level (background ﬂ uctuations). The proposed procedure of coherent accumulation is essentially equivalent to the o peration of coincidence schemes which are extensively used in X-ray and gamma-ray telescopes. If the SID response and background ﬂuctuations, respective ly, are considered to be the signal and noise, then as a consequence of a statistical independence o f background ﬂuctuations the signal/noise ratio when detecting the ﬂare eﬀect is increased through a co herent processing by at least a factor of√ N, where Nis the number of LOS. The solar ﬂares of July 29, 1999 and Decevber 28, 1999 were use d to illustrate the performance of the proposed method. Fig.1a presents the geometry of a glo bal GPS array used in this paper to analyze the eﬀects of the July 29, 1999 ﬂare (105 stations). H eavy dots correspond to the location of the GPS stations. The upper scale indicate the local time, LT, corresponding to 19:00 UT. The coordinates of the stations are not given here for reasons of space. As is evident from Fig. 1a, the set of stations which we chose o ut of the global GPS network available to us, covers rather densely North America and Eur ope, but provides much worse coverage of the Asian part of the territory used in the analysis. The nu mber of GPS stations in the Paciﬁc and Atlantic regions is even fewer. However, coverage of the ter ritory with partial beams to the satellite for the limitation on elevations θ >10◦, which we have selected, is substantially wider. Dots in Fig. 1a mark the coordinates of subinospheric points for t he height of the F2–layer maximum hmax= 300 km for all visible satellites at 19:00 UT for each GPS sta tion. A total number of beams (and subionospheric points) used in this paper to analyze th e July 29, 1999 ﬂare is 622. Fig.1b presents the geometry of a global GPS array used in thi s paper to analyze the eﬀects of the December 28, 1999 solar ﬂare, (230 stations; only for the dayside). A total number of beams (and subionospheric points) is 1200. Such coverage of the terrestrial surface makes it possible t o solve the problem of detecting time- coincident events with spatial resolution (coherent accum ulation) two orders of magnitude higher, as a minimum, than could be achieved in SFD detection on oblique HF paths. For simultaneous events in the western hemisphere, the correspoding today’s number of stations and beams can be as many as 400 and 2000–3000, respectively. It should be noted that because of the relatively low satelli te orbit inclinations, the GPS network (and to a lesser degree GLONASS) provides poor coverage of th e Earth’s surface near the poles. However, TEC measurements in the polar regions are ineﬀecti ve with respect to the detection of the ionospheric response to a solar ﬂare because the amplitu de of background ﬂuctuations in this case is much higher when compared with the mid-latitude iono sphere. This is partiocularly true of geomagnetic disturbance periods. For the same reason, equa torial stations should also be excluded from a coherent processing. If the Earth’s ionosphere is regarded as the ﬁlling of some gl obal detector of X-ray and EUV emissions, then it is possible to estimate a huge volume Vdetof the potential sensitivity region of such a detector. This volume is equal to one-half the diﬀerence of the volumes of spheres with the radii Rz+HmaxandRz+Hmin Vdet= 2π[(Rz+Hmax)3−(Rz+Hmin)3]/3 (5) where HminandHmaxare the upper and lower boundaries of the absorbing layer for a given part of the ﬂare emission spectrum. For the EUV range, Hmin= 100 km, and Hmax= 200 km [16], whichgives the volume Vdetof order 2 .65 1019m3. For the X-ray part of the spectrum, Hmin= 60 km, and Hmax= 80 km [16], and the corresponding volume is 0 .523 1019m3. The actual sensitivity is in fact determined by the number of beams penetrating the region of potential sensitivity. Furthermore, solar ﬂare-induced T EC perturbations constitute but a small part of TEC including the height range up to 1000 km. There are meth ods to estimate the height in the ionosphere, but they do not come within the province of this p aper. On the one hand, GLOBDET time resolution is limited by techni cal capabilities of the GPS system. Essentially, data with a time resolution of about 30 s are currently available on the INTER- NET, which is insuﬃcient for a detailed analysis of the ﬁne st ructure of the SID time dependence. Yet this limitations seems to be transient since current mul tichannel two-frequency GPS receivers can operate with a time resolution of up to 0.1 s. On the other hand, time resolution is determined by time cons tants of ionization and recombina- tion processes in the ionosphere at a given height [8], [16]; these parameters can be taken into acount when processing the data. 5 Ionospheric response to the solar ﬂare of July 29, 1999 A powerful impulsive ﬂare of July 29, 1999 was chosen to illus trate the practical implementation of the proposed method. The thick line in Fig. 2d shows the time d ependence of the X-ray emission intensity R(t) of this ﬂare as measured by the X-telescope BATSE on satelli te CGRO in 25–50 keV range. The envelope of the dependence R(t) represents a bell-shaped pulse of about 3-min duration with a maximum corresponding to 19:34 UT, or to about 12:00 LT in the U.S. West (Fig. 1a). This time interval is characterized by a low level of geomagn etic disturbance (within -10 nT), which simpliﬁed greatly the SID detection problem. We now describe brieﬂy the sequence of GPS data processing pr ocedures. Primary data include series of ”oblique” values of TEC I(t), as well as the corresponding series of elevations θ(t) and azimuths α(t) along LOS to the satellite calculated using our developed C ONVTEC program which converts the GPS system standard RINEX-ﬁles on the INTERNET [10]. The determination of SID characteristics involves selecting continuous series of I(t) measurements of at least a one-hour interval in length, which includes the time of the ﬂare. Series of elev ations θ(t) and azimuths α(t) of the beam to the satellite are used to determine the coordinates o f subionospheric points. In the case under consideration, all results were obtained for elevati onsθ(t) larger than 10◦. Fig. 2a presents typical time dependencies of an ”vertical” TECI(t) for the PRN03 satellite at the CME1 station (40 .4◦N; 235 .6◦E) on July 29, 1999 (thick line) and for PRN21 at the CEDA station (40 .7◦N; 247 .1◦E – thin line). It is apparent from Fig. 2a that in the presence of slow TEC variations, the SID-induced short-lasting sudden increas e in TEC is clearly distinguished in the form of a ”step” as large as 0.4 TECU . For the same series, similar lines in panel b. show variation s of the time derivative of TEC dI(t)/dtwith the linear trend removed and with a smoothing with the 5- min time window. The TEC time derivative is invoked because it reﬂects electron d ensity variations which are proportional to the X-ray or EUV ﬂux [16]. The coherent summation of dI(t)/dtirealizations was made by the formula S(t) =N/summationdisplay i=1dI(t)/dtiKi (6) The (normalized to N) result of a coherent summation of the S(t)-series for all beams and GPSstations located mainly on the dayside is presented in panel c (thick line). A comparison of the resulting coherent sum of S(t) with the time dependence dI(t)/dtfor individual beams presented in panel b. conﬁrms the eﬀect of a substantial increase of the si gnal/noise ratio caused by a coherent processing. It is interesting to compare, for the same time interval, the results from a coherent summation for the dayside and nightside. The r.m.s. of the coherent sum ofS(t) in panel c. for the nightside (thin line) is an order of magnitude (as a minimum) smaller th an the SID response amplitude. A comparison of the coherent sum of S(t) with the time dependence of the X-ray emission intensity R(t) of the July 29, 1999 ﬂare, based on the data from the X-telesc ope BATSE on satellite CGRO data in 25–50 keV range (panel d), shows their high correlati on and an almost total coincidence of the form of S(t) with the R(t) pulse envelope. It should be noted, however, that generally TEC variations S(t) are 60 s ahead of R(t). It is pointed out in [16] that EUV emission is mostly responsible f or SID in the F-region, TEC variations are also well correlated with X-ray ﬂares. This is also conﬁr med by simultaneous measurements of ﬂare emission characteristics in the X-ray and EUV ranges by the Solar Maximum Mission spacecraft [19]. It is also observed in [16] that the EUV emission ﬂare do es lead (but only slightly) the X-ray ﬂare. 6 Ionospheric response to the solar ﬂare of December 28, 1999 A powerful impulsive ﬂare of December 29, 1999 was chosen als o to illustrate the practical imple- mentation of the proposed method. The dashed line in Fig. 3d s hows the time dependence of the X-ray emission intensity R(t) of this ﬂare as measured by the X-telescope BATSE on satelli te CGRO in 25–50 keV range (thin line). The envelope of the dependenc eR(t) represents a bell-shaped pulse of about 1.5-min duration with a maximum corresponding to 00 :44 UT, or to about 16:00 LT in the U.S. West (Fig. 1b). This time interval is characterized by a low level of geomagnetic disturbance (within - 22 nT), which simpliﬁed greatly the SID detection p roblem. The December 28, 1999 ﬂare was also recorded by X-ray telescope HXT on the YOHKOH satell ite (Fig. 3d - thick line; in 23-33 keV range). Fig. 3a presents typical time dependencies of an ”vertical” TECI(t) for the PRN26 satellite at the LEEP station (39 .1◦N; 241 .7◦E) on December 28, 1999 (thick line) and for PRN04 at the CHI1 station (60 .2◦N; 213 .3◦E – thin line). It is apparent from Fig. 3a that in the presence of slow TEC variations, the SID-induced short-lasting sudden increas e in TEC is clearly distinguished in the form of a ”step” as large as 0.2–0.5 TECU . For the same series, similar lines in panel b. show variation s of the time derivative of TEC dI(t)/dtwith the linear trend removed and with a smoothing with the 5- min time window. The (normalized to N) result of a coherent summation of the S(t)-series for all beams and GPS stations located mainly on the dayside is presented in panel c (thick line). A comparison of the coherent sum of S(t) with the time dependence of the X-ray emission intensity R(t) of the December 28, 1999 ﬂare, based on the data from the X-te lescopes BATSE on satellite CGRO data in 25–50 keV range and HXT on the YOHKOH satellite in 14-23 keV range (panel d), shows their high correlation and an almost total coincidenc e of the form of S(t) with the R(t) pulse envelope.7 Discussion and conclusions This paper has oﬀered a brief outline of the concept of a globa l detector (GLOBDET) of atmospheric disturbances, based on phase measurements of a TEC in the ion osphere which were made using the international network of two-frequency multichannel G PS receivers. We have discussed the possibilities of using GLOBDET method in detecting ionosph eric eﬀects of solar ﬂares. A case study of a global ionospheric response to a powerful solar ﬂares of July 29, 1999 and December 28, 1999 illustrates the new experimental potential. The GLOBDET technology, suggested in this paper, can be used to detect small solar ﬂares; the body of data processed is the only limitation in this case. Th e high sensitivity of GLOBDET permits us to propose the problem of detecting, in the ﬂare X-ray and E UV ranges, emissions of nonsolar origins which are the result of supernova explosions. For powerful solar ﬂares like the one examined in this report , it is not necessary to invoke a coherent summation, and the SID response can be investigate d for each beam. This opens the way to a detailed study of the SID dependence on a great variety of parameters (latitude, longitude, solar zenith angle, spectral characteristics of the emissi on ﬂux, etc.). With current increasing solar activity, such studies become highly challenging. In adidt ion to solving traditional problems of esti- mating parameters of ionization processes in the ionospher e and problems of reconstructing emission parameters [16], the data obtained through the use of GLOBDE T can be used to estimate the spatial inhomogeneity of emission ﬂuxes at scales of the Earth’s rad ius. The GLOBDET technology can also be used in detecting disturb ances of natural and technogenic origins accompanied by the propagation of acoustic and acou stic-gravity waves. They include such phenomena as explosions, rocket launches, solar eclipses, the displacement of the solar terminator, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, heavy thunderstorms, an d auroral heating. Unlike solar ﬂares, however, the response to the above-mentioned eﬀects is not t ime-coincident for diﬀerent beams. Therefore, when selecting complex factors ˜Ki, it is necessary to appropriately take into account the amplitude attenuation and the phase delay which are caused b y the propagation decay and ﬁnite velocity (sonic and subsonic in this case) of the response in the ionosphere. Furthermore, a processing of traveling TEC disturbances implies essentially using re gional rather than global GPS networks, which reduces the sample statistic of the beams when the sign al is accumulated. 8 Acknowledgments Author is grateful to Altyntsev A. T. and L. A. Leonovich for t heir encouraging interest in this study and active participations in discussions. Author is also in debted to V. V. Grechnev, E. A. Koso- gorov, O. S. Lesuta and K. S. Palamarchouk for preparing the i nput data. Thanks are also due V. G. Mikhalkovsky for his assistance in preparing the Engli sh version of the T EX-manuscript. This work was done with support from the Russian Foundation for Ba sic Research (grant No. 99-05-64753) and from RFBR grant of leading scientiﬁc schools of the Russi an Federation No. 00-15-98509. References [1] Afraimovich, E. L., K. S. Palamartchouk, and N. P. Pereva lova, GPS radio interferometry of travelling ionospheric disturbances, J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 60,1205–1223, 1998.[2] Afraimovich E. L., E. A. Kosogorov, L. A. Leonovich, K. S. Palamarchouk, N. P. Perevalova, and O. M. Pirog, Determining parameters of large-scale trav eling ionospheric disturbances of auroral origin using GPS-arrays, J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys. 61,2000 (accepted). [3] Calais E. and J. B. Minster, GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations following the January 1994, Northridge earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22,1045–1048, 1995. [4] Calais E. and J. B.Minster, GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations following a Space Shuttle ascent, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23,1897–1900, 1996. [5] Calais E., M. A. H. Hedlin, M. A. Hofton, and B. J. Minster, Ionospheric signature of surface mine blasts from Global Positioning System measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 132, 191–202, 1998. [6] Collin R. E. Antennas and Radiowave Propagation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985. [7] Davies K. Ionospheric radio waves, Blaisdell Publishing Company, A Division of Ginn and Company, Waltham, Massachusetts-Totonto-London, 1969. [8] Donnelly R. F, Contribution of X-ray and EUV bursts of sol ar ﬂares to sudden frequency devia- tions, J. Geophys. Res., 74,1873–1877, 1969. [9] Fitzgerald T. J., Observations of total electron conten t perturbations on GPS signals caused by a ground level explosion, J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 59,829–834, 1997. [10] Gurtner, W., RINEX: The Receiver Independent Exchange Format Version 2. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov:80/igscb/data/format/rine x2.txt, 1993. [11] Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., H. Lichtenegger, and J. Collin s,Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, 1992. [12] Klobuchar, J. A., Ionospheric time-delay algorithm fo r single-frequency GPS users, IEEE Trans- actions on Aerospace and Electronics System, AES 23(3), 325–331, 1986. [13] Klobuchar, J. A., Real-time ionospheric science: The n ew reality, Radio Science, 32,1943–1952, 1997. [14] Mannucci, A. J., C. M. Ho, U. J. Lindqwister, T. F. Runge, B. D. Wilson and D. N. Yuan, A global mapping technique for GPS-drived ionospheric TEC m easurements, Radio Science, 33, 565–582, 1998. [15] Mendillo M., J. A. Klobuchar, R. B. Fritz, A. V. da Rosa, L . Kersley, K. C. Yeh, B. J. Flaherty, S. Rangaswamy, P. E. Schmid, J. V. Evans, J. P. Schodel, D. A. Mat soukas, J. R. Koster, A. R. Webster, P. Chin, Behavior of the Ionospheric F Region Durin g the Great Solar Flare of August 7, 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 79,665–672, 1074. [16] Mitra A. P., Ionospheric eﬀects of solar ﬂares, New Delhi -12, India, 1974. [17] Saito A., S. Fukao and S. Miyazaki, High resolution mapp ing of TEC perturbations with the GSI GPS network over Japan, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25,3079–3082, 1998. [18] Thome G. D and L. S.Wagner, Electron density enhancemen ts in the E and F regions of the ionosphere during solar ﬂares, J. Geophys. Res., 76,6883–6895, 1971.[19] Vanderveen K., L. E. Orwig, and E. Tandberg-Hanssen, Te mporal correlations between impulsive ultraviolet and hard X-ray busts in solar ﬂares observed wit h high time resolution, Astrophys. J., 330, 480–492, 1988.0306090120150180210240270300330360 Longitude, E-80-60-40-20020406080 Latitude, N -80-60-40-20020406080Latitude, N 024681012141618 2022 LT λολο φοφο July 29, 1999; 19:30 UT0306090120150180210240270300330360 Longitude, EDecember 28, 1999; 00:44 UT b a00 04 08 12 16 20 LTFigure /1/: Geometry of the GPS arra y used in this pap er when analyzing thee/ects of the July /2/9/, /1/9/9/9 solar / are /(/1/0/5 stations/) /{ a /. Hea vy dots corresp ondto the lo cation of the GPS stations/. The upp er scale indicates the lo cal time/,L T/, corresp onding to /1/9/:/0/0 UT/. Dots sho w the co ordinates of subionosphericp oin ts for the heigh t of the F /2/{la y er maxim um/, hmax /= /3/0/0 km for all satellitesseen at /1/9/:/0/0 UT for eac h of the GPS stations/. A total n um b er of b eams /(andsubionospheric p oin ts/) is /6/2/2/. Same as in Fig/./1a/, but for the Decem b er /2/8/, /1/9/9/9solar / are /(/2/3/0 stations/; only for the da yside/) /{ b /. The upp er scale indicates thelo cal time/, L T/, corresp onding to /0/0/:/0/0 UT/. A total n um b er of b eams is /1/2/0/0/.0.00.51.01.5I(t), TECU -2.00.02.04.06.0dI(t)/dt, TECU 103s-1 -1.00.01.02.03.0S(t), TECU 103s-1 19:2419:3019:3619:4219:48 Time, UT010000200003000040000R(t), rel.unitsa b c d29 July 1999 CME1; PRN03 CEDA; PRN03 BATSE 25-50 keVCME1; PRN03 CEDA; PRN03Figure /2 /: Time dep endences of TEC on the da yside I /( t /) on July /2/9/, /1/9/9/9 /{ a /,and v ariations of the time deriv ativ e dI /( t /) /=dt with the linear trend remo v ed anda smothing with the /5/-min time windo w /{ b /, for stations CME/1 /(PRN/0/3/{thic kline/) and CED A /(PRN/2/1/{thin line/)/. The normalized coheren t sum of v ariationsof the TEC time deriv ativ e S /( t /) for all LOS for the da yside /{ c /(thic k line/)/. F orcomparison/, thin line in panel c/. sho w S /( t /) for the nigh tside/. d /{ X/-ra y emissionin tensit y v ariations R /( t /) as deduced from the X/-telescop e BA TSE on satelliteCGR O data in /2/5/{/5/0 k eV range/.0.01.02.03.0I(t), TECU -2.00.02.04.0dI(t)/dt, TECU 103s-1 -0.50.00.51.01.5S(t), TECU 103s-1 0:36 0:42 0:48 0:54 Time, UT0250500R(t), rel.unitsa b c d28 December 1999 BATSE 25-50 keVYOHKOH 23-33 keVCHI3; PRN04 LEEP; PRN26 CHI3; PRN04 LEEP; PRN26 YOHKOH 23-33 keVFigure /3 /: Time dep endences of TEC on the da yside I /( t /) on Decem b er /2/8/,/1/9/9/9 /{ a /, and v ariations of the time deriv ativ e dI /( t /) /=dt with the linear trendremo v ed and a smothing with the /5/-min time windo w /{ b /, for stations LEEP/(PRN/2/6/{thic k line/) and CHI/1 /(PRN/0/4/{thin line/)/. The normalized coheren t sumof v ariations of the TEC time deriv ativ e S /( t /) for all LOS for the da yside /{ c /(thic kline/)/. F or comparison/, the thin line in panel d sho w X/-ra y emission in tensit yv ariations R /( t /) as deduced from the X/-telescop e BA TSE on satellite CGR O datain /2/5/{/5/0 k eV range/. Thic k line sho w X/-ra y emission v ariations R /( t /) as deducedfrom the X/-ra y telescop e HXT on the YOHK OH satellite in /2/3/-/3/3 k eV/.
arXiv:physics/0007027v1 [physics.gen-ph] 11 Jul 2000It is the ambiguity. (But only three generations) Alejandro Rivero∗ Dep. Economia, Univ. Carlos III Madrid February 2, 2008 Abstract It is suggested that generations are linked to the need of cal culating curvature of space via a deformed or discrete calculus. Quan tization would limit the deformation, building three generations, and not four, as other interpretation could imply. 1 Introduction It is known [8, 11] that the usual ambiguity in the deﬁnition o f (partial) deriva- tives of a function becomes a source of problems when we go to q uantum theory. The simplest example is Feynman quantum mechanics (or 0+1 di mensional ﬁeld theory), where diﬀerent elections of discretisation for th e derivative drive to dif- ferent ordering rules in the quantized theory; Weyl corresp onds to the symmetric one, Born-Jordan to the forward derivative, and so on, and ev en more exotic eﬀects could be got by gauging the ambiguity. My paper [17] has been understood in [2] as if it were giving th eoretical support to the existence of a fourth generation. Indeed, as i t is pointed in [17] and also previously in [16], I believe that the ambiguities o f a discrete curvature only point to three generations, the extant ambiguity being absorbed in a scale parameter which relates to Plank constant (and, to the defor mation parameter of the calculus). It is my fault that this process is just half cooked, in sparse references at the end of [15] and, as appendix, in [14]. I apol ogize I can not help with a detailed example yet, so in order to try to clear the con fusion, this paper can only to expand on the ideas of our previous [17]. So, please consider this note as a traditional conference po ster, trying to put illustrations to the previous work. The examples of the prev ious papers were formulated in the context of non commutative geometry. Here we will keep ourselves in the conceptual cloud. 2 Pictorial image The main observation, ﬁgure (1), is that to deﬁne a vector tan gent at a point x0we need to build two series of points approaching x0, so the limit ( x2−x1)/ǫ will give the tangent vector. It seems that there are two ambi guities, to choose ∗rivero@wigner.unizar.es 1x2and to choose x1, but one of them can be absorbed into the scale parameter. The extant ambiguity is the one we proposed to consider a mass . x0 x1x2 Figure 1: q-tangent vector to the point x0 Consider now, as in ﬁgure (2), a curve of which we want to know t he cur- vature at a point. This implies to give four points, so the ort hogonal to two q-tangent vectors will cross marking the position of the rad ius of curvature, and giving us the inverse of the curvature when the continuous li mit is approached. Again the scale can absorb one of the ambiguities, and we have three free parameters, that we can identify with three masses. When going to higher dimensions, the play is not more ambiguo us, but it is more complicated (Figure 3). The curvature tensor is build f rom the curvatures of the geodesic surface tangent to each 2-plane. Every direc tion must be con- sidered, and dependences between the ambiguities of orthog onal directions are not clear. There are ways to simplify the task, for instance asking for a dditional re- strictions (isotropy, homogeneity) to the space-time mani fold. In any case, we should expect now to multiply our degeneration times the num ber of dimension of space time, to be able to cope with every curvature. Thus we will get four particles (from space-time dimension) and three generatio ns (from ambiguity). Last, consider how the scale parameter could come into play. Every tangent vector is deﬁned via tales theorem, ﬁgure (4), relating the t ime (or parameter of the curve) with the distance. Classically each triangle i s well deﬁned at each point of the curve. Now, doubts can be raised when we make an in tegration (ﬁgure 5) in the ”deformed” way, before any limit. It seems th at we should introduce an scale parameter ǫ, to be able to add the quantities of each triangle, and that the continuous limit should come when ǫ→0. The process as I see it is a little more involved, as ﬁrst one ne eds to use scale invariance to go from a bare ǫto a renormalized h, and the classical limit is h→0. This method is needed because the groupoid of paths given b y Connes does not add ( x, y, t)(y, z, t) to (x, z,2t) but to ( x, z, t). 2x2x4 x3 x1x0 Figure 2: Curvature of a curve through x0 3 Interdisciplinary work The most popular of all the regularisation problems is the on e of fermion dou- bling, which happens when we try to quantize fermions in latt ice quantum ﬁeld theory. Here, if we use only the symmetric deﬁnition of deriv ative we ﬁnish with a set of 2dfermions for each initial fermion in the theory. Wilson cure s this by incorporating the ambiguity to the theory, building each derivative as a combination of symmetric and antisymmetric part, and then g iving a high mass to the antisymmetric combination, which controls the unwan ted degrees of free- dom. Recently [12, 9] Wilson’ approach has been resuscited a nd the Ginsparg- Wilson condition is looking for a place in non commutative ge ometry. L¨ uscher’ approach is perhaps closest to Dimakis or Majid ones, but Bal achandran [1] is already looking for a role for it near to the axiomatic of NCG m anifolds. From the point of view of non commutative geometry, it seems [ 10] that naive lattice ﬁeld theory does not qualify as a diﬀerential g eometry, as even when multiple copies of elements are taken (which seems need ed to cope with NCG ﬁrst order axiom), it fails to fulﬁll Poincare duality. T o get out of this trap, the suggestion should be to act with the Dirac operator in diﬀerent points of the space. We will do this by introducing small ﬁnite diﬀerences betwee n the ﬁelds at- tached to each fermion, and relating this diﬀerence to the in verse of the mass reasoned in the pictorial show, so that in the very low energy limit the imple- mented diﬀerence becomes equal to the derivative it discret izes. Our goal is to expand NCG Lagrangian to contain information about quantiz ation ambiguity, 3Figure 3: Two curvatures of a surface but with this technique we also get to introduce the spectrum of masses. Time ago in Barcelona, Alain, in a dual session with Asthekar , suggested that the newer versions [5, 6] of the Connes-Lot approach sho uld be seen as an low energy approximation to a completely non commutative sp ace only visible at high energy. In some sense, here the methodology is reversed , betting ﬁrst of a ”very non commutative” model and trying to guess a method to g o down to low energy. At very low energy, only gravity should be seen, whil e at intermediate energy, Connes-Chamseddine or Connes-Lot should be suitab le approximations. Just to visualize such approximation we want to keep ourselv es using the Dirac operator formalism. On the other hand, from the Tangen t Groupoid construction, we know that the set of functions over the tang ent space TMof a manifold can be pasted, via Weyl quantization [3, 4], to the set of kernels k(x, y) of operators in a Hilbert space, and this formalism is very n ear to the ﬁnite diﬀerence scheme proposed above. It should be nice if o ur candidates for diﬀerential forms had some duality with this space of operat ors. Also because the tangent groupoid seems closer to q-deformations as made by Majid and others, and to the non-commutative formalism used by lattic e theoretists in the above referred works. 4 Mass Basic mass, as we have seen, should be ﬁxed by the position of t he vector of ﬁgure 1 respective of the point which ”diﬀerentiation” is as signed to. 4Figure 4: Tangent vector as a limit or ”instantaneous veloci ty” Figure 5: Summation (integration) across a section of the ta ngent bundle. Should a length scale be deﬁned at every point? 5For each particle, a mass relationship can be imposed asking to the second derivatives to give the same result as a iteration of the ﬁrst derivatives. So the two vectors of a curvature would be given by the positions of t he extreme points of the vector giving the ﬁrst derivative. Such relationship could be not needed if some geometrical co nsistency condi- tions where imposed to the mass matrix. For instance, it is kn ow that Poincare Duality forces the Connes-Lott model generations to be dege nerated in mass. More restringent conditions could appear. Finally, the mass relation between diﬀerent particles is th e touchiest point. My bet is to link it to a preferred kind of metrics, with a prefe rred set of coordinate systems. Very much as it happens in a spherical se t of coordinates: a variation across δrhas no additional weight, variations across δθ, δφ carry an additional weight r, and variation across δφcarries an additional term respect toδθ. In [16], this was stated with an obscure comparison between quarks and angles. 5 Acknowledgements To gauge the ambiguity is a suggestion of E. Follana, yet to ex plore. Cheerfully acknowledged, as well as a lot of support to discuss other ide as. Momentum space was seen as conﬁguration space with a ﬁeld of forces in s ome coﬀee talks with J. I. Martinez, according my old notebooks. Again, yet t o explore. And, as noted elsewhere, the main thesis of this paper surfaced wh ile a bedroom talk with J. Guerrero at Vietri, where I was driven to think in anal ogies between the four fundamental fermions and a four dimensional volume for m. More about this can be forthcoming in [18], where we wonder about the rel ation between junk removal and the Pauli antisymmetrization of Nfermions. The relaxing ambiance provided by the folks of La Latina , the Madrid inner neighborhood where I am doing a half sabbatical, should also be acknowledged. References [1] A. P. Balachandran et al., The Fermion Doubling Problem and Noncom- mutative Geometry , hep-th/9911087 [2] Chao-Shang Huang et al., TheB→Xsl+l−andB→Xsγdecays with the fourth generation , hep-ph/9911203 [3] JF Cari˜ nena et al., Connes’ Tangent Groupoid and Deformation Quanti- zation , J. of Geom. and Phys, v 32 (1999). math/9802102 [4] A. Connes, Non Commutative Geometry , Academic Press 1994 [5] A. Connes, Non Commutative Geometry and Reality [6] A. Chamseddine, A. Connes, A Universal Action Formula , preprint hep- th/9606056 [7] A. Connes, Gravity coupled with matter and the foundation of non commu- tative geometry , preprint hep-th/9603053 6[8] J.S. Dowker, Path Integrals and Ordering Rules, J. Math. Phys. 17(1976) [9] , T. Fujikawa et al., Non-commutative Diﬀerential Calculus and the Axial Anomaly in Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories , hep-lat/9906015 [10] M. G¨ okeler and T. Sh¨ uker, Does noncommutative geometry encompass lat- tice gauge theory , hep-th/9805077 [11] Roy R. Gould, Am. J. Phys. ,63, n. 2 (1995) [12] M. L¨ uscher, Chiral gauge theories on the lattice with exact gauge invari ance, hep-lat/9909150 [13] S. Majid, Advances in Quantum and Braided Geometry , q-alg/9610003 v2 [14] A. Rivero, Introduction to the tangent grupoid , dg-ga/9710026. [15] A. Rivero, A short derivation of Feynman formula , quant-ph/9803035 [16] A. Rivero, Some conjectures looking of a NCG theory , hep-th/9804169 [17] A. Rivero, On generations, hep-th/9905021 [18] A. Rivero, Junk: the fermionic ansatz , work in course. [19] M. Santander, Interpretacion geometrica de la gravitacion , DFTUZ/93/11 7
THE PROPOSED NLC LINAC LLRF SYSTEM* P. Corredoura✝, C. Adolphsen Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, Ca 94309, USA Abstract The proposed Next Linear Collider (NLC) contains linac systems operating at L,S,C, and X band. This paper describes a wideband modular low-level RF (LLRF) sys- temapplicableforallNLCpulsedRFsystems.Highspeed digital IF techniques are used for both arbitrary klystron drive modulation and accurate RF vector detection. Mea- surementofrelativebeamtoRFphase,beamloadingcom- pensation, and structure dipole modes for automated alignment are all handled by the system. Modern signal processing techniques are also described. 1. INTRODUCTION The NLC is essentially a pair of opposing X-band linacs designed to collide 500 GeV electrons and positrons. The main linac RF system is a major driving cost for the project consisting of 1600 X-band klystron tubes and relatedhardware.PulsestackingRFtechniquesareusedto efﬁciently develop the 600MW 300ns RF pulses required at each girder. A group of 8 klystrons (an 8 pack) deliver RF power to 8 girders, each girder supports 3 accelerator structures. Pulse stacking and beam loading compensation requires fast modulation of the klystron drive signal. A programmable digital IF solution will be presented. The absolute phase of the accelerating RF with respect to the beam is a critical parameter which must be mea- sured and controlled to the 1 degree X-band level. Even with a state-of-the-art stabilized ﬁber optic RF refer- ence/distribution system, there will still be phase drifts presentinthesystemwhichwillrequiremeasuringtherel- ativephasebetweenthebeamandacceleratingRFatregu- lar intervals. The techniques for making this and other X-band measurements are described in this paper can be applied to any linac RF system. Transverse alignment must be achieved to extremely tight tolerances to prevent excitation of transverse modes. Each accelerator is a damped detuned structure which is designed to load down the undesirable high-order modes (HOMs) and allow their external detection to facilitate alignment of each girder [1]. The shape of each individual accelerating cell in a structure is altered slightly along the length of the structure making the HOM frequencies a function of the longitudinal position on the structure. The frequencyofthelowestordertransversemoderangesfrom 14 to 16 GHz corresponding to upstream and downstream respectively [2]. A receiver will be outlined which mea- sures the beam induced HOMs allowing automated align- ment of each girder via remote mechanical movers.2. KLYSTRON DRIVE GENERATION For the main linac system the output of 8 klystrons will be combined to deliver X-band RF to 8 accelerator girders through a high power distribution and delay system (DLDS) (ﬁgure 1). Each ~3us klystron pulse will be time multiplexed to steer RF power successively to 8 accelera- torgirdersbyquicklymodulatingtherelativephasesofthe klystron drive during a pulse. Wideband klystrons (>100MHz) will allow rapid phase switching to improve overall efﬁciency. Fixed delays in the DLDS deliver RF power a ﬁll time in advance of the beam. Fig.1. Diagramshowing8klystrondriving8linacgirders. Tocompensateforbeamloading,klystronswillbepre- cisely phase ramped during the ﬁrst ~100ns of each sub-pulse to direct some RF power to a port which is out oftimewiththebeam.Thisallowstheklystronstooperate in saturation while minimizing the energy spread across the 95 bunch train. To compensate for unknown transmis- sion phase shifts the system must produce any drive phase and allow a smooth transition to any other phase. Speciﬁ- cations for the main linac LLRF drive system are listed below in table 1. Parameter Value carrier frequency 11.424 GHz pulse width 3.1 us bandwidth >100 MHz phase range arbitrary, continuous phase resolution <1 degree dynamic range > 20 dB Table 1: Main linac LLRF drive requirements.KKKKKKKK 600 MW Delay Line Distribution Systemgirder #10girder #19 girder #1girder #28girder #37girder #46girder #55girder #64 *Work supported by Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515 ✝plc@slac.stanford.eduSLAC-PUB-8497 July 2000 Presented at the 7th Annual European Particle Accelerator C onference (EPAC 2000), Austria Center Vienna, June 26-30, 2 000.An in-phase/quadrature (IQ) drive generation system was produced for the next linear collider test accelerator (NLCTA) [3]. Two high speed (250 MS/S) DACs were usedtodriveanX-bandbasebandIQmodulator(ﬁgure2). The IQ technique works but is sensitive to mixer offsets, quadrature errors, baseband noise and requires two DACs. Fig.2. BasebandIQtechniqueusedtoproducetheX-band klystron drive waveform in the NLCTA. To reduce system cost and improve accuracy a digital IF approach is being pursued (ﬁgure 3). A modulated IF tone burst is generated by a single programmable DAC channel and up-mixed with a locked local oscillator (LO) to drive the klystron preampliﬁer. The IF frequency must be high enough to meet the system bandwidth requirements and allow ﬁlters to be realized which reject the image and the LOleakage.Frequencymultiplierscanbeusedtoraisethe IF frequency without increasing the DAC clock rate at the expense of phase resolution. A single sideband modulator can be used to reduce the image amplitude. Fig. 3. Digital IF technique for driving pulsed klystrons. ItisimportanttonotethatthephaseoftheoutputRFis a function of the phase of the (multiplied) DAC produced tone burst and the phase of the LO when the DAC is trig- gered. By choosing the IF frequency to be an integer mul- tiple of the bunch separation frequency (357 MHz for NLC), the phase of the accelerating RF will repeat for each bunch time slot (equations 1-4). This eliminates the need to load a differently phased DAC waveform or to resynchronize the LO before each machine pulse. Equations1-4. DerivationshowingRFphaserepeatsevery bunch separation (T) interval. T is for NLC.To estimate the DAC resolution required to produce drive phase shifts refer to ﬁgure 4. If we use the full DAC range to synthesize the IF waveform then the mini- mum phase shift we can resolve corresponds to a one bit changeatazerocrossing.A7bitDACattheIFfrequency is required. If multiplication is used to raise the IF fre- quency more bits are needed. A x8 multiplier requires 3 additionalbits.Producingthe89.15MHzsub-IFwitha12 bit device will allow operating the DAC below full scale. Fig. 4. Bits required to achieve phase resolution. Applying the digital IF signal generation technique to otherNLClinacsystemsoperatingatdifferentfrequencies simply requires a different RF modulator and LO refer- ence. The system bandwidth required to support X-band linacpulseswitchingwilleasilysupportSLEDcavityPSK or compressor beam loading compensation requirements. Maintaining the systems will also become less specialized since the DAC/IF hardware and some software will be identical for all klystrons operating at L,C,S, or X-band. 3. DIGITAL RF VECTOR DETECTION To conﬁgure the NLC main linac RF systems, measure- ment techniques must be available to allow proper align- ment of the accelerating RF to the beam. Again, a digital IF technique is being planned. The unknown RF signal is mixed down to an IF frequency, ampliﬁed, dither added (optional), and sampled with a high speed ADC (ﬁgure 5). The choice of the receiver IF frequency is less constrained than for klystron drive generation. The 89.25 MHz IF sys- tem shown will have 4 possible phase offsets for measure- ments triggered on 4 consecutive 357 MHz clocks. If the sample phase offset for each measured IF pulse were known it could be corrected for during post processing. Alternatively, a 357 MHz IF could be used. Undersam- pling techniques would be used to keep sample rates and memory requirements reasonable while maintaining sufﬁ- cient channel bandwidth. Fig. 5. Digital receiver to accurately measure IF vectors.I DAC Q DACvoltage to currentmemory memoryvoltage to currentbaseband IQ modulator 11.424 GHzX-band drive waveform output to TWT preampliﬁer RF reference DAC memorysingle sideband modulatorfrequency multiplier 10.710 GHzX-band drive 89.25 MHz714 MHzbandpass ﬁlter 357 MHzIF sub-IF11.424 GHz lockedLO reference clockwaveform output to TWT preampliﬁer φIFφLO+ φRF= 1[ ] 8φsubIFφLO+ φRF= 2 [ ] 8π 2-- -TφsubIF+  30 2π ( )TφLO+ ( )+ φRF= 3 [ ] 2 2π ( )T 8φsubIF+ 30 2 π ( )TφLO+ ( )+ φRF= 4 [ ] 357 MHz( )1 –1° + full scale - full scaleΔφ1bit} } full scale( ) ω tΔφ+( )sin 1 count = 5 [ ] full scale1 Δφ ( )sin-------------------1 1° ( )sin------------------ 57 counts = = = 6 [ ] bits required log22 57⋅ ( )7 bits at 714 MHz≅ = 7 [ ]At zero crossing: 1° X 11.33475 GHzIF ﬁlterADCmemoryIF gain DSP dither (optional)+ 357 MHz sample11.424 GHz RF signal to measure locked LO89.25 MHz clockRF ﬁlter (optional)Deriving wideband amplitude and phase vectors from asampledIFwaveformcanbeachievedbyapplyingaHil- bert transform. The Hilbert technique involves taking the Fourier transform of the sampled IF data, nulling all nega- tive frequency bins, scaling positive bins by 2, and ﬁnally takingtheinverseFouriertransform.Thisproducesacom- plextimedomainvectorallowingcalculationofamplitude and phase vectors (ﬁgure 6). While in the frequency domain, ﬁltering may be applied by nulling any undesired spectral bins, potentially enhancing algorithm efﬁciency. Fig. 6. Driving a klystron and detecting the output using digitalIFtechniques.Thereceiverbandwidthwas20MHz. To allow automated conﬁguration of the RF systems severalmeasurementsmustbeavailable(ﬁgure7).TheRF output of each klystron output coupler (P1,P2) must be measured to monitor klystron performance. The loaded accelerating RF is measured to allow compensating for beam loading and properly phasing the RF to the beam. Structuretransversealignmentisdeterminedbymeasuring thebeaminduceddipolemodes(X,Y).Abeampickupcan provide a phase reference if the receiver LO is chosen not to be locked to the machine reference. Fig.7. Measurementsneededforautomatedconﬁguration. Themostdifﬁcultmeasurementtaskisdeterminingthe RF/beam phase during single bunch operation. The struc- ture output RF port allows direct measurement of the accelerating RF, loaded RF, or the beam induced RF (no input RF applied). Dynamic range is an issue since a sin- gle pilot bunch of 1e9 particles induces RF 40dB below the accelerating RF. By applying dither to the IF (ﬁgure 5) and averaging 10 pulses, the pilot bunch phase can be measured to accuracy (no klystron RF). Alternativelythe phase of the accelerating RF can be compared to the loadedRFphaseduringasinglepulse.Thevectordiagram (ﬁgure 8) indicates that the relative angle must be mea- sured to accuracy. Simulations show 200 averages of a dithered 89.25 MHz IF using a 7 bit ADC to sample the 285ns burst would be required. Both techniques are truly differential allowing absolute resolution of RF/beam phase and support totally automated linac phasing. Fig. 8. Vector diagram of RF, beam, and loaded RF. Mod- ern techniques can measure the true RF/beam phase. Measurementofthe14-16GHzstructuredipolemodes requires a variable LO source to mix the desired signal down to the IF frequency. A ﬁlter and a RF limiter before the mixer are required to limit peak power when the struc- ture is misaligned. A triple bandpass ﬁlter passes dipole modes harmonically related to bunch spacing and corre- sponding to the center and both ends of the structure. AdditionalIFgain(30dB)willbeappliedwhenthesignals become small to produce the 65 dB dynamic range required to measure 1 micron offsets with a single shot pilot bunch (no averaging). Recently a receiver has been tested on a structure and beam reference pickup installed in the SLAC linac (ﬁgure 9). Fig.9. IFwaveform/resultsfromstructurealignmenttest. IFtoneburstwasdigitizedusinga1GHz8bitVXIscope. 4. CONCLUSION The digital IF technique proposed to produce arbitrary drive waveforms and accurately detect accelerator RF sig- nals has produced encouraging initial tests results. The development of a high speed DAC/ADC module is planned. A full 8 pack test installation is planned. 5. REFERENCES [1] J.W. Wang et al, “Accelerator Structure R&D for Linear Colliders”, PAC 99. [2] M. Seidel, “Studies of Beam Induced Dipole-Mode Signals in Accelerating Structures at the SLC”, PAC 97. [3] S. Holmes et al, “Low Level RF Signal Processing for the NLCTA”, PAC 97.arXiv:physics/0007028 11 Jul 200000.20.4amplitude − linearMeasured DAC 89.25 MHz subIF −2000200phase − degrees22.5 degree step 00.050.1amplitude − linearMeasured Klystron Output Using 89.25 MHz IF 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000−2000200 time − nsphase − degrees180 degree step K DLDS combinerRF input loadbeam referencestructure output RFX YP2P1accelerator structuretunnel RF measurementsgallery RF measurements K dipole modes outputs ... 1°0.01° magnitude = S realimaginaryaccelerating RF vectorbeamrelative beam phase =Φ vector sum magnitude = Ainduced vector relative loaded/unloaded RF phase =αΦα ( )sin A S--- -----------------      asin α+ ≅ 0 50 100 150 200 250−0.1−0.0500.050.1 time − nsamplitude − voltsMeasured IF Beam Reference Mixed from 14.994 GHz −400−300−200−100 0100200300400050100150200250 beam position − micronsStructure Receiver Output vs. Beam Positionreceived power/phase − linear/degrees
EXPERIENCE WITH THE PEP-II RF SYSTEM AT HIGH BEAM CURRENTS* P. Corredoura✝, S. Allison, W. Ross, R. Sass, R. Tighe Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, Ca 94309, USA Abstract The PEP-II B Factory Low-Level RF System (LLRF) is a fully programmable VXI based design running under an EPICS control environment. Several RF feedback loops are used to control longitudinal coupled-bunch modes driven by the accelerating mode of the RF cavities. This paper updates the performance of the LLRF system as beam currents reach design levels. Modiﬁcations which enhance the stability, diagnostics, and overall operational performance are described. Recent data from high current operation is included. 1. INTRODUCTION Both the high energy ring (HER) and the low energy ring (LER) of the PEP-II B factory are inherently longitudi- nallyunstableduetointeractionbetweenthebeamandthe fundamental mode of the RF cavities [1]. RF feedback loopsoperatingatbasebandandaﬁberopticconnectionto the longitudinal multibunch feedback system were used successfully to control the low-order longitudinal modes (ﬁgure 3) [2,3,4]. The system is modular and very com- pact.TheLLRFhardwareforeachRFstationisbasedona set of custom, highly integrated VXI modules (ﬁgure 1). Each station contains a built-in network analyzer to con- ﬁgure and test the feedback loops and a series of transient signal recorders which can record a wide variety of wave- forms. After a fault has occurred the circular buffers are frozen and the data is stored in ﬁles. This post-mortem analysis capability has proven to be extremely beneﬁcial for diagnosing problems, especially intermittent faults. Fig. 1. PEP-II LLRF system VXI crate topology (HER) AB SCANNERSLOT 0µPROCESSOR SPARE (2)ARC/INTLK DET476 MHz reference ethernetmulti-bunch “kick” cavity probes (4) RF outstation RF inputs (24) interlocks HVPS trigger 471.1 MHz L.O.476 MHz GAP VOlTAGE FFWD COMB FILTER (I) IQ/AMP DETECTOR 1COMB FILTER (Q)RFP MODULECLK/RF DISTRIB. IQ/AMP DETECTOR 2IQ/AMP DETECTOR 3 to AB systemOverall the system has preformed extremely well. To date stored current has reached 950 mA in the HER and 1700 mA in the LER. Even at the highest currents the beams are well stabilized by the active controls. Presently the HER beam current is limited to the 700 mA due to heating of one vacuum chamber. Beam current and phase of both rings while colliding are shown (ﬁgure 2). Fig. 2. Beamcurrentand phaseproﬁlesmeasuredduring collidingwithhardwarebuiltintotheLLRFsystem.Thesi- nusoidal shaped HER phase is due to four parked cavities. The use of RF feedbacks does complicate some aspects of system operation. The changes we have made andplantomaketoimproveoperationwillbedescribedin detail so others may beneﬁt from our experience. 2. DECREASING STATION CYCLE TIME Once beam currents exceed ~300 mA, a beam abort will cause all the RF stations to trip on cavity reﬂected power. This is due to the cavities tuners being set to match the large reactive beam contribution, which is suddenly removed. In addition, the wideband direct RF feedback loop attempts to maintain the gap voltage (ﬁgure 3), keep- ing output power high while cavities are reﬂecting >90kW of RF power. Since the tuners cannot move quickly we chose to improve the overall station power-up cycle time. The power-up procedure is implemented as an EPICS state sequence, thus is fully programmable [5]. The origi- nal approach (slow turn-on) energized the station at a moderate gap voltage with RF feedback loops disabled. The gain of the direct and then the comb loop were ramped up, followed by raising the gap voltage to the desired level. This procedure required three minutes to complete. The new fast turn-on scheme presets the tuner positions, loop gains, and baseband IQ references to their no-beam, normal gap voltage values. The klystron high voltage corresponding to the no-beam condition is then0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 805101520 time − usbeam current − mA/sampletotal HER current = 701.6 mA (red) total LER current = 1119.8 mA (blue)Measured HER and LER Beam Current and Phase 12−Jun−2000 14:07:24 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 805101520 time − usphase − degreesmean HER phase = 13.0 degrees mean LER phase = 10.7 degrees *Work supported by Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515 ✝plc@slac.stanford.eduSLAC-PUB-8498 July 2000 Presented at the 7th Annual European Particle Accelerator C onference (EPAC 2000), Austria Center Vienna, June 26-30, 2 000.applied. Once the klystron reaches nominal output all the feedback loops settle into regular operation. This tech- nique reduced the cycle time to less than 20 seconds, but there were complications... Fig. 3. Block diagram of RF feedback loops used in the PEP-II low-level RF system. Multi-cavities not shown. 3. EXCESSIVE BASEBAND VOLTAGES When direct RF feedback is employed, the drive power is proportionaltothedirectlooperrorvoltage.InanIQbase- band RF system like PEP-II, the error signals are voltages representing the real and imaginary components of what eventually will become the klystron RF drive. During operational conditions when the error signals become large,excessivebasebandvoltagesmaypresentaproblem. Fig. 4. PEP-II LLRF baseband drive analog processing. TheanalogsignalchainforthePEP-IILLRFsystemis depicted in ﬁgure 4. The baseband modulator is composed of four wideband analog multipliers followed by a pair of high speed op-amps [4]. This particular modulator is used to compensate for klystron gain and phase variations due to changes in the cathode voltage as power requirements vary (PEP-II klystrons do not contain modulation anodes). The multipliers are Gilbert-cell based devices rated at 1 volt maximum input. An idiosyncrasy of this class of mul- tipliers is that when over-driven the output polarity may actually invert. This would result in an incorrect phase shift across the modulator and may cause positive feed- back around the direct RF feedback loop. This effect com-plicated our initial attempts for fast turn-on. To prevent overdriving the multipliers, back-to-back Schottkydiodeswereinstalledacrossthefeedbackresistor in the gain stage preceding the baseband modulator. A series resistor was added to form a “soft” limiter at the desired1voltthreshold(ﬁgure5).Theadditionofthelim- iting circuit greatly improved the performance of the fast turn-on approach and is presently in use. There is, how- ever, a further complication... Fig. 5. Schematic of gain ampliﬁer with limiting diodes. 4. SECONDARYEFFECTOFKLYSTRON GAIN TRACKING As klystron cathode voltage is elevated to increase output power, the gain of the tube increases. This effect is most dramatic in the LER since each klystron drives two rather then four cavities. The required klystron power ranges from250kW(nobeam)uptotherated1.2MWoutput,an increase of 7dB. Since the klystron is in the direct RF feedbackloop,thegainofthebasebandmodulatormustbe decreased to compensate for the additional klystron gain. Decreasing the modulator gain forces an increase in the multiplier input voltages in order to keep drive power con- stant. This implies that enough dynamic range must be available to allow the multiplier input voltages to double and still remain less than 1 volt. Fig. 6. Block diagram showing components responsible for determining how IQ voltages scale to drive power. Conﬁguring the drive chain (ﬁgure 6) such that at the maximum modulator gain (corresponding to the no-beam klystron power) the IQ voltages are half scale is achieved bypickingthepropertransimpedancegainandﬁxedatten- uators. During conditions when the IQ voltages are satu- rated (during fast turn-on for example), the drive power could exceed four times the desired value. We avoid this during fast turn-on by presetting the baseband modulatorklystron direct RF loop comb beamRF BPMlongitudinal multi-bunchΣRF reference feedback systemto wideband kickerband limited kick signal+ _ripple loop mod. mod.gap loopstation reference tuner loopcavitiesHVPS klys sat. loop error ﬁber optic link ﬁltersdelay equal.1 turn delay_ Σ ΣIREF QREFgain gainX XI-I I-Q X XQ-I Q-QΣΣ RF mod.476 MHz carrier drive amp.+ ++_ klystroncavity I sum cavity Q sum+ + -- baseband modulator50K 500 +_ outputinput100 1N4157 (2) baseband modulatorvoltage to current ampliﬁerIQ RF modulatorI in Q in ﬁxed attenuators476 MHz 120 W ampliﬁerRF output klystrondrivequad DACgain to the minimum allowed (full beam current) setting. 5. PREVENTING EXCESSIVE DRIVE POWER FOR ROBUST OPERATION During normal operation we have experienced occasional, asyetunexplained,suddenlossofthecavityprobeRFsig- nal. The built-in transient recorders have proven very use- ful to study these phenomenon. The fault signature is not consistent with a full cavity arc since the reﬂected power does not show a large perturbation. In systems operating with direct RF feedback the loss of a cavity probe signal will cause the drive chain to immediately saturate. If the klystron is severely over-driving, the output power will actually drop (ﬁgure 7). If the drive power exceeds the peak of the saturation curve, even for a brief instant, the direct feedback loop will saturate and not recover. Fig. 7. Measured klystron saturation curve showing sug- gested operating points (Wop) at various cathode voltages. In an attempt to prevent klystron overdrive we conﬁg- ured the transimpedance ampliﬁer gain such that the RF modulator was operating near saturation when producing saturated klystron drive power from one baseband input (I orQ).Thisimpliesthatthemaximumpowercouldbe3dB higher if both inputs were driven to saturation. In practice the task of balancing maximum available drive power with required dynamic range of the baseband modulator is a trade off. Operating any of the components near saturation degrades the system’s ability to amplitude modulate. The ability of the LLRF system to fully cancel the RF ripple caused by the switching aspect of the high voltage power supply (HVPS) is compromised. Based on our experience we propose upgrading the system. 6. PROPOSED CHANGES Byapplyingactivelimitersbeforethebasebandmodulator we can prevent overdriving the multipliers while preserv- ing linearity during normal operation (ﬁgure 8). Suitable op-amps must be selected which can tolerate the +/-1 volt differentialvoltagespresentduringnon-limitingcondition. A second limiting circuit will be added to prevent the drive power from exceeding the klystron’s saturation point (ﬁgure 9). The actual drive power will be detected by anexisting linear detector in the IQA module [6]. If the detected voltage exceeds a programmable set-point, both the baseband drive signals will be reduced proportionally to decrease the drive power to a programmable level while maintaining the output phase. We expect this feature will allow each RF system to “ride through” transient events which presently cause a fault. Fig. 8. Bipolar limiter to prevent overdrive of multipliers. Fig.9. Drivepowerlimitingcircuittoimproverobustness. The ﬁnal change we plan to make to the system is the addition of a wideband analog “ripple” loop to cancel RF modulation caused by the switching aspect of the HVPS. A DSP was intended to handle this task but the combina- tion of signiﬁcant delay in the digital IQ receiver and the 50 kHz bandwidth ripple proved challenging. Presently an analog integrator in the direct RF feedback loop cancels the ripple but simulations show it will cause instability as beam currents reach 2A. 7. CONCLUSIONS The PEP-II RF system has performed extremely well. Large beam currents are routinely stored with no sign of instabilities. The EPICS interface provides a ﬂexible tool toimprovemanyoperationalaspectsofthesysteminshort order. We hope our experience with baseband RF feed- backs will provide others with useful information. 8. REFERENCES [1] F. Pedersen, “RF Cavity Feedback”, SLAC-400, November 1992. [2] P. Corredoura et al, “Low Level System Design for the PEP-II B Factory”, PAC 95. [3] J. Fox et al, “Bunch-by-Bunch Longitudinal Feedback System for PEP-II”, EPAC 94 [4] P. Corredoura, “Architecture and Performance of the PEP-II Low-Level RF System”, PAC 99. [5] S. Allison, R. Claus, “Operator Interface for the PEP-II Low Level RF Control System”, PAC 97 [6] C. Ziomek, P. Corredoura “Digital I/Q Demodulator”, PAC 95.1015202530354045505560050100150200250300350400450500 drive power − Woutput power − kW65 kV 20 WopMeasured Klystron Saturation Curve HR85 16−Jun−2000 60 kV 20 Wop 55 kV 15 Wop+_output input +_ +1 volt -1 volt baseband modulatorvoltage to current ampliﬁerI in Q in 120 W ampliﬁer drivequad DAC RF mod.476 MHz X X linear detector klystrontoDAClimiting circuit
arXiv:physics/0007030v1 [physics.class-ph] 11 Jul 2000TRUE TRANSFORMATIONS OF SPACETIME LENGTHS AND APPARENT TRANSFORMATIONS OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTANCES. I. THE THEORY Tomislav Ivezi´ c Ruder Boˇ skovi´ c Institute, P.O.B. 180, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia ivezic@rudjer.irb.hr It is shown in this paper that the diﬀerence between the two fo rms of relativity - the ”true transformation (TT) relativity” and - the ”apparent t ransformation (AT) relativity” is essentially caused by the diﬀerence in the concept of sameness of a physical system, i.e., of a physical quantity, for diﬀerent, relatively moving, obser vers. In the ”TT relativity” the same quantity for diﬀerent inertial frames of reference is covar iantly deﬁned four-dimensional (4D) tensor quantity, which transforms according to the Lorentz transformation as the TT. In the ”AT relativity” parts of a 4D tensor quantity are often co nsidered as the same quantity for diﬀerent observers, although they correspond to diﬀere nt quantities in 4D spacetime, and they are not connected by the Lorentz transformation tha n by the AT. Then the true transformations of a spacetime length and the apparent tran sformations of a spatial distance (the Lorentz contraction) and of a temporal distance (the us ual dilatation of time) are examined in detail. It is proved that only the true transform ations of the spacetime length are in agreement with the special relativity as the theory of a 4D spacetime with the pseudo- Euclidean geometry. PACS number(s): 03.30.+p Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality. H. Minkowski A quantity is therefore physically meaningful (in the sense that it is of the same nature to all observers) if it has tensorial properties under Lorentz transformations. F. Rohrlich I. INTRODUCTION In [1] and [2] (see also [3]) two forms of relativity are discu ssed, the ”true transformations (TT) relativity” and the ”apparent transformations (AT) re lativity.” The notions of the TT and the AT are ﬁrst introduced by Rohrlich [4], and, in the sam e meaning, but not under that name, discussed in [5] too. The TT are the transformations of the four-dimensional (4D) spacetime tensors referring to the same quantity (in 4D spacetime) considered in diﬀeren t inertial frames of reference (IFRs), or in diﬀerent coordinatizations of some IFR. An example of the TT are the covari- ant Lorentz transformations (LT) of 4D tensor quantities, ( see [6] and [2]). Such covariant LT as the TT are the transformations in 4D spacetime and they t ransform some 4D tensor quantity Qa.. b..(xc, xd, ..) from an IFR StoQ′a.. b..(x′c, x′d, ..) in relatively moving IFR S′,(all parts of the quantity are transformed). Since the ”TT relati vity” is based on the TT of 1physical quantities it is obviously the manifestly covaria nt formulation of the special rela- tivity. However, there is an important diﬀerence between th e usual covariant formulation of the special relativity and the ”TT relativity.” Namely, it i s considered in the usual covariant formulation of the special relativity that the 4D spacetime tensor quantities, e.g., the elec- tromagnetic ﬁeld tensor Fab,do have well-deﬁned mathematical meaning in the theory but, nevertheless, the real physical meaning in experiments is a ssumed to be attributed not to such 4D spacetime quantities than to some related quantitie s, e.g., the electric and magnetic three-vectors (3-vectors) EandB,from the ”3+1” space and time. In the ”TT relativity” only one sort of quantities, the 4D spacetime tensor quantit ies, do have well-deﬁned meaning in our 4D spacetime, both, mathematical meaning in the theor y, and a real physical mean- ing in experiments; the complete and well-deﬁned measurement from the ”TT relat ivity” viewpoint is such measurement in which all parts of some 4D qu antity are measured. In contrast to the TT the AT are not the transformations of 4D spacetime tensors an d they do not refer to the same 4D quantity, but to diﬀerent quan tities in 4D spacetime. Usually, depending on the used AT, only a part of a 4D tensor qu antity is transformed by the AT, and such a part of a 4D quantity, when considered in diﬀ erent IFRs (or in diﬀerent coordinatizations of some IFR), corresponds to diﬀerent qu antities in 4D spacetime. Thus, for example, the AT refer to the quantities deﬁned by the same way of measurement in diﬀerent IFRs. An example of the ”AT relativity” is the conventional specia l relativity based on two Einstein’s postulates and, consequently, on th e relativity of simultaneity, on the synchronous deﬁnition of the spatial length , i.e., on the AT of the spatial length (the Lorentz contraction, see [4,5,1–3]), and the AT of the temporal distance (the conventional dilatation of time), as will be proved in this paper, and, as s hown in [1] (see also [3]), on the AT of the electric and magnetic 3-vectors EandB(the conventional transformations of E andB,see, e.g., [7], Sec.11.10). In this paper, Sec.2, some general consideration on the two f orms of relativity will be done. In Sec.3 the TT of the spacetime length for - a moving rod , Sec.3.1, and - a moving clock, Sec.3.2, are exposed. Then in Sec.4 the AT of - the spat ial distance (the Lorentz ”contraction”), Sec.4.1, and of - the temporal distance (th e time ”dilatation”), Sec.4.2, are considered. Conclusions are given in Sec.5. II. GENERAL CONSIDERATION ON THE ”TT RELATIVITY” AND THE ”AT RELATIVITY” The main diﬀerence between the ”TT relativity” and the ”AT re lativity” stems from the diﬀerence in the concept of sameness of a physical system, i.e., of a physical quantity, for diﬀerent observers. That concept actually determines t he diﬀerence in what is to be understood as a relativistic theory. In the ”TT relativity” as Rohrlich [4] states: ”The special t heory of relativity is char- acterized by the group of Lorentz transformations which des cribes the way two diﬀerent observers relate their observations of the same physical systems .” (my emphasis) Then he continues with the words taken here as a second motto: ”A quan tity is therefore physically meaningful (in the sense that it is of the same nature to all ob servers) if it has tensorial properties under Lorentz transformations. ”Similarly Gamba states in [5] : ”Special rela- 2tivity gives us rules to compare results of an experiment per formed by an observer Swith results obtained by another observer S′, moving with constant velocity with respect to S. It is, of course, implied that both obsevers are experimenting upon the same physical system ... ,” and ”The quantity Aµ(xλ, Xλ) forSis the same as the quantity A′ µ(x′ λ, X′ λ) forS′when all the primed quantities are obtained from the correspondi ng unprimed quantities through Lorentz transformations (tensor calculus).” These examples show that in the the ”TT relativity” the speci al relativity is understood as the theory of 4D spacetime with pseudo-Euclidean geometr y. Quantities of physical interest, both local and nonlocal, are represented by space time tensors, i.e., as covariant quantities, and the laws of physics are written in a manifest ly covariant way as tensorial equations .Such an understanding of the special relativity and of the co ncept of sameness of a physical system, i.e., of a physical quantity, is consis tently applied in [1], [2] (see also [3,8,9]) by extending the works [4] and [5] to the relativist ic electrodynamics in terms of the introduction of the four-vectors (4-vectors) EαandBαof the electric and magnetic ﬁeld, respectively, and their TT, instead of the usual 3-vec torsEandBand their AT (the conventional transformations of EandB,[7]). It has to be noted that although Rohrlich [4] and Gamba [5] clearly exposed the concept of sameness of a physical quantity in 4D spacetime they also did not notice that the usual transforma tions of the 3-vectors EandB [7] are - the AT, i.e., that EinSandE′inS′do not refer to the same 4D tensor quantity. The covariant formulation of electrodynamics with 4-vecto rsEαandBαis constructed in [1–3] and shown to be equivalent to the usual covariant formu lation with the electromagnetic ﬁeld tensor Fαβ.Also the covariant Majorana form of Maxwell’s equations is d one in [2], while in [1] (and [9]) the covariant form of the energy-momen tum density tensor Tαβfor the electromagnetic ﬁeld and the fully covariant form of a nonlo cal quantity, the electromagnetic momentum 4-vector Pα f, are constructed in terms of the 4-vectors EαandBα.It has to be noticed once again that in the ”TT relativity” only such 4D te nsor quantities as are Eαand Bα, Fαβ, Tαβ, Pα f,..., are considered to be well-deﬁned not only mathematical ly but also experimentally, as measurable quantities with real physic al meaning. The laws of physics written as tensorial equations with 4D sp acetime tensors in an IFR will have the same form in some other IFR, i.e., in new coor dinates, if new and old coordinates are connected by those coordinate transformat ions (the TT) that leave the interval ds, and thus the pseudo-Euclidean geometry of the spacetime, u nchanged. (It is explicitly shown in [2] that the AT - the Lorentz contraction , as a coordinate transformation in 4D spacetime, changes the inﬁnitesimal spacetime distan ceds.) In fact, it is more correct to say that the laws of physics will have the same form for thos e coordinate transformations that leave the form, i.e., the functional dependence, of the metric tensor unchanged .Then dswill also be unchanged under such coordinate transformatio ns, but, generally, the reverse does not hold. This means that in the reference frames that are connected by such coordinat e transformations all physical phenomena will proceed in the same way, (taking into account the corresponding initial and boundary conditions), and th us there is no physical diﬀerence between them, what is the content of the principle of relativ ity. The existence or nonexistence of the group of transformations that assure the form-invari ance of the metric tensor, and thus also the form-invariance of the covariant equations (physi cal laws), is completely determined by the spacetime geometry. Hence, one concludes that in the ” TT relativity” the principle of relativity, in contrast to the Einstein formulation of th e special relativity [10], is not a 3fundamental principle, than it is a simple consequence of th e spacetime geometry. (The geometry of the spacetime is generally deﬁned by the inv ariant inﬁnitesimal space- time distance dsof two neighboring points, ds2=dxagabdxb. (1) I adopt the following convention with regard to indices. Rep eated indices imply summation. Latin indices a, b, c, d, ... are to be read according to the abstract index notation, see [ 11], Sec.2.4.. They designate geometric objects and they run fro m 0 to 3. Thus dxa,band gab,and of course ds(1),are deﬁned independently of any coordinate system, e.g., gabis a second-rank covariant tensor (whose Riemann curvature ten sorRa bcdis everywhere vanishing; the spacetime of special relativity is a ﬂat spacetime, and t his deﬁnition includes not only the IFRs but also the accelerated frames of reference). Gree k indices run from 0 to 3, while latin indices i, j, k, l, ... run from 1 to 3, and they both designate the components of some geometric object in some coordinate chart, e.g., xµ(x0, xi) and x′µ(x′0, x′i) are two coordinate representations of the position 4-vector xain two diﬀerent inertial coordinate systems SandS′,andgµνis the 4 ×4 matrix of components of gabin some coordinate chart. Let the coordinate transformations from StoS′bex′µ=x′µ(xν).Then the metric tensor gµνtransforms according to the law g′ µν(x′) = (∂xα/∂x′µ)(∂xβ/∂x′ν)gµν(x(x′)),and if the coordinate transformations are such that they leave the for m, i.e., the functional dependence, of the metric tensor unchanged, then dswill necessarily be an invariant quantity under such coordinate transformations.) Since the ”TT relativity” deals on the same footing with all p ossible coordinatizations of a chosen reference frame (inertial or accelerated), the second Einstein postulate referred to the constancy of the coordinate velocity of light also doe s not hold in the ”TT relativity.” Only in Einstein’s coordinatization (”e” coordinatizatio n; when Einstein’s synchronization of distant clocks and cartesian space coordinates xiare used in an IFR S) the coordinate, one-way, speed of light is isotropic and constant. Thusthe basic elements of the ”TT relativity,” as a covariant for mulation of the special relativity, and of the usual Einstein’s formulation of the s pecial relativity, are quite diﬀerent. Einstein’s formulation is based on two postulates: the prin ciple of relativity and the constancy of the velocity of light. In the ”TT relativity” the primary i mportance is attributed to the geometry of the spacetime; it is supposed that the geometry o f our 4D spacetime is a pseudo- Euclidean geometry in which only 4D tensor quantities do hav e real physical meaning . (The similar ideas about the primary importance of the geometry o f the spacetime, not only in the general relativity but also in the special relativity, i nstead of Einstein’s postulates [10], are expressed in several modern treatments, e.g., [12].) Einstein [10], and many others, considered that general law s of physics must be covariant, but for Einstein, and for the majority of physicists, such co variance of general laws does not necessarily mean that the physical quantities of the theory have to be deﬁned in a covariant manner, as covariant 4D tensor quantities. Thus, for exampl e, Einstein [10] introduced into the special relativity several quantities that are not covariantly deﬁned and whose transformations are the AT. The examples are: the synchrono usly deﬁned spatial length with the AT - the Lorentz contraction, the temporal distance with the AT - the time dilatation, which will be discussed here. He also used the 3-vectors EandBin the formulation of 4the relativistic electrodynamics ,and derived their transformations, which are not the LT of some well-deﬁned quantity in 4D spacetime and they do not ref er to the same 4D quantity, i.e., they are also the AT, as shown in [1] (and [3]). In all cases in which two quantities connected by the AT are considered to refer to the same physic al quantity in 4D spacetime we have , what Gamba [5] calls, the case of mistaken identity . To better explain this issue I quote Gamba’s words, [5]: ”As far as relativity is concerne d, quantities like AµandA′ µ (they are from diﬀerent IFRs SandS′,andthey are connected by the AT , my remark) are diﬀerent quantities, not necessarily related to one anothe r. To ask the relation between A′ µ andAµ,from the point of view of relativity, is like asking what is th e relation between the measurement of the radius of the Earth made by an observer Sand the measurement of the radius of Venus made by an observer S′.We can certainly take the ratio of the two measures; what is wrong is the tacit assumption that relativity has som ething to do with the problem just because the measurements were made by twoobservers.” (At this point I remark once again that neither Gamba, despite of such clear understandi ng of the concept of sameness of a physical system in 4D spacetime, did not notice that the u sual transformations of the 3-vectors EandBare, in fact, the AT, and in that respect he also dealt with the case of mistaken identity.) III. TRUE TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE SPACETIME LENGTH The whole above consideration is performed in order to empha size the importance of the geometry of 4D spacetime in the formulation of special relat ivity, and to point out general diﬀerences between the ”TT relativity” and the ”AT relativi ty.” In the following sections these diﬀerences will be illustrated considering some spec iﬁc examples, the spacetime length with its TT and then the spatial and temporal distances with t heir AT. A. The spacetime length - for a moving rod For the sake of completness we repeat (and in some measure exp and) the main results for the spacetime length, and for the AT of the spatial distan ce, that were already found in [2]. The invariant spacetime length (the Lorentz scalar) be tween two points (events) in 4D spacetime does have deﬁnite physical meaning in the ”TT rela tivity” and it is deﬁned as (in the abstract index notation) l= (lagablb)1/2, (2) where la(lb) is the distance 4-vector between two events AandB,la=la AB=xa B−xa A,xa A,B are the position 4-vectors and gabis the metric tensor. Using diﬀerent coordinatizations of a given reference frame one can ﬁnd diﬀerent expressions, i. e., diﬀerent representations of the spacetime length l,Eq.(2). We shall consider lin two relatively moving IFRs Sand S′and in two coordinatizations ”e” and ”r” in these IFRs, where ”e” stands for Einstein’s coordinatization in which Einstein’s synchronization of d istant clocks and cartesian space coordinates xiare used in an IFR, and where ”r” stands for ”radio” coordinat ization of an IFR in which ”everyday” or ”radio” synchronization of dis tant clocks is used, see [2]. 5(Diﬀerent synchronizations are determined by the paramete rεin the relation t2=t1+ ε(t3−t1), where t1andt3are the times of departure and arrival, respectively, of the light signal, read by the clock at A, and t2is the time of reﬂection at B, read by the clock at B, that has to be synchronized with the clock at A. In Einstein’s synchronization convention ε= 1/2 and the measured coordinate velocity of light is constant a nd isotropic. A nice example of a non-standard synchronization is ”everyday” or ”radio” clock synchronization [14] in which ε= 0 and there is an absolute simultaneity; see also [15]). For further purposes we shall also need a covariant 4D expres sion for pure LT when written in geometrical terms, see [6] and [2], La b≡La b(v) =ga b−2uavb c2+(ua+va)(ub+vb) c2−u·v, (3) where uais the proper velocity 4-vector of a frame Swith respect to itself, ua=cna, nais the unit 4-vector along the x0axis of the frame S,andvais the proper velocity 4-vector of S′relative to S,andu·v=uava.The form of the covariant 4D Lorentz transformations (3) is independent of the chosen synchronization, i.e., coo rdinatization of reference frames. With the use of (3) the transformation of covariantly deﬁned physical quantities reduces to the evaluation of invariant scalar products, e.g., when Labis applied to the position 4-vector xaone ﬁnds (in the abstract index notation) x′a=ga bxb+[n·x−(2γ+ 1)v·x/c]na+ (n·x+v·x/c)va/c 1 +γ, (4) where γ=−n·v/c. When Einstein’s synchronization of distant clocks and cart esian space coordinates xiare used in an IFR S then, e.g., the geometric object gabis represented by the 4 ×4 matrix of components of gabin that coordinate chart, i.e., it is the Minkowski metric te nsorgµν,e= diag(−1,1,1,1).ThenLabis represented by Lµν,e,the usual expression for pure LT, but with vi e(the proper velocity 4-vector vµ eisvµ e≡dxµ e/dτ= (γec, γevi e), dτ≡dte/γeis the scalar proper-time, and γe≡(1−v2 e/c2)1/2) replacing the components of the ordinary velocity 3-vector V.(In the usual form the LT connect two coordinate representat ions (in the ”e” coordinatization) xµ e, x′µ eof a given event. xµ e, x′µ erefer to two relatively moving IFRs (with the Minkowski metric tensor) SandS′, x′µ e=Lµ ν,exν e, L0 0,e=γe, L0 i,e=Li 0,e=−γevi e/c, Li j,e=δi j+ (γe−1)vi evje/v2 e. Since gµν,eis a diagonal tensor the space xi eand time te(x0 e≡cte) components of xµ edo have their usual meaning. Then the geometrical quantity ds2(1) can be written in terms of its representation ds2 e,with the separated spatial and temporal parts, ds2=ds2 e= (dxi edxie)− (dx0 e)2, and the same happens with the spacetime length l(2), l2=l2 e= (li elie)−(l0 e)2. Such separation remains valid in other inertial coordinate syst ems with the Minkowski metric tensor, and in S′one ﬁnds l2=l′2 e= (l′i el′ ie)−(l′0 e)2,where l′µ einS′is connected with lµ ein Sby the LT Lµν,e. Let us also consider the above relations in the ”r” coordinat ization. By the same con- struction as in [14] we can ﬁnd the relations between the base vectors in ”r” and ”e” coordi- natizations. (We consider, as in [14] and [2] (but now in 4D sp acetime), that the spacetime 6is endowed with base vectors, the temporal and the spatial ba se vectors. The bases {eµ}, with the base vectors {e0, ei}, and{rµ},with the base vectors {r0, ri},are associated with ”e” and ”r” coordinatizations, respectively, of a given IFR .) The connection between the bases{eµ}and{rµ}is r0=e0, ri=e0+ei. (5) Then the metric tensor gabbecomes gµν,rwith g00,r=g0i,r=gi0,r=gij,r(i/ne}ationslash=j) =−1, gii,r= 0. (6) The knowledge of gµν,renable us to ﬁnd the transformation matrix between ”r” and ”e ” coordinatizations. In [12] Logunov derived the expression for the transformati on matrix connecting diﬀer- entials of physical (how he named it) time and distance dXµwith the coordinate ones dxµ, (dXµ=λµ νdxν,in his notation, [12] Sec.22.), and by the same matrix λµ νhe connected a physicaly measurable tensor with the coordinate one. Thus i n the approach of [12] there are physical and coordinate quantities for the same coordin atization of the considered IFR. In my opinion both dXµanddxνare equally well ”physical” and measurable quantities, and we can interpret that dXµcorresponds to the Einstein coordinatization of a given IFR , while dxνcorresponds to some arbitrary coordinatization of the same IFR. Hence, in my interpretation of Logunov results his matrix λµ νis, actually, the transformation matrix be- tween some arbitrary coordinatization and the ”e” coordina tization. It has to be noted that although in the Einstein coordinatization the space and tim e components of the position 4-vector do have their usual meaning, i.e., as in the prerela tivistic physics, and in ds2 ethe spatial and temporal parts are separated, it does not mean th at the ”e” coordinatization does have some advantage relative to other coordinatizatio ns and that the quantities in the ”e” base are more physical. The elements of λµ ν[12], which are diﬀerent from zero, are λ0 0= (−g00)1/2, λ0 i= (−g0i)(−g00)−1/2, λi i= [gii−(g0i)2/g00]1/2.We actually need the inverse transformation (λµ ν)−1(it will be denoted as Tµ νto preserve the similarity with the notation from [2]). Then the elements (that are diﬀerent from zero) of the matrix Tµ ν,which transforms the ”e” coordinatization to the coordinatization determined by th e metric tensor gµν,are T0 0= (−g00)−1/2, T0 i= (g0i)(−g00)−1/bracketleftBig gii−(g0i)2/g00/bracketrightBig−1/2, Ti i=/bracketleftBig gii−(g0i)2/g00/bracketrightBig−1/2. (7) Hence Tµ ν,which transforms the ”e” coordinatization to the ”r” coordi natization, is found to be Tµ µ=−T0 i= 1,and all other elements of Tµ νare = 0 .Using that Tµ νwe ﬁnd xµ r=Tµ νxν e, x0 r=x0 e−x1 e−x2 e−x3 e, xi r=xi e. (8) The LT Lµν,rin the ”r” base can be easily found from (3) and the known gµν,r,and the elements that are diﬀerent from zero are x′µ r=Lµ ν,rxν r, L0 0,r=K, L0 2,r=L0 3,r=K−1, L1 0,r=L1 2,r=L1 3,r= (−βr/K), L1 1,r= 1/K, L2 2,r=L3 3,r= 1, (9) 7where K= (1 + 2 βr)1/2,andβr=dx1 r/dx0 ris the velocity of the frame S′as measured by the frame S(it is assumed that S′is moving relative to Salong the common x1 e, x′1 e−axes), βr=βe/(1−βe) and it ranges as −1/2≺βr≺ ∞.Since gµν,r,in contrast to gµν,e,is not a diagonal metric tensor then in ds2 rthe spatial and temporal parts are not separated, and the same holds for the spacetime length l,see [2] for the results in 2D spacetime. Expressing dxµ r,orlµ r, in terms of dxµ e,orlµ e,one ﬁnds that ds2 r=ds2 e,and also, l2 r=l2 e,as it must be. Next we consider the spacetime length in two relatively movi ng IFRs SandS′and in two coordinatizations ”e” and ”r” in these IFRs, i.e., we consid er it with respect to {eµ},/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig and{rµ},/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig bases. First we consider in short the same example as in [2], i.e., we consider a particular choice for the 4-vector la AB(in the usual ”3+1” picture it corresponds to an object, a rod , that is at rest in an IFR Sand situated along the common x1 e, x′1 e−axes). For simplicity we work in 2D spacetime and the situation is pictured in Fig.1. The base vectors are constructed as in [14] and [2], and here w e expose this construction once again for the sake of clearness of the whole exposition. The temporal base vector e0 is the unit vector directed along the world line of the clock a t the origin. The spatial base vector by deﬁnition connects simultaneous events, the event ”clock at rest at the origin reads 0 time” with the event ”clock at rest at unit distance fr om the origin reads 0 time,” and thus it is synchronization-dependent. The spatial base vector e1connects two above mentioned simultaneous events when Einstein’s synchroniz ation ( ε= 1/2) of distant clocks is used. The temporal base vector r0is the same as e0.The spatial base vector r1connects two above mentioned simultaneous events when ”radio” clock synchronization ( ε= 0) of distant clocks is used. All the spatial base vectors r1, r′ 1, ..are parallel and directed along an (observer-independent) light line. Hence, two events that are everyday (”r”) simultaneous inSare also ”r” simultaneous for all other IFRs. 8FIGURES FIG. 1. The spacetime length for a moving rod. In the ”TT relat ivity” the same quantity for diﬀerent observers is the geometrical quantity, the dis tance 4-vector la AB=xa B−xa A; only one quantity in 4D spacetime. It is decomposed with respect to {eµ},/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig and{rµ},/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig bases. The bases{eµ},/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig refer to Einstein’s coordinatization of two relatively mov ing IFRs SandS′,and the bases {rµ},/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig refer to the ”radio” coordinatization of SandS′. la ABcorresponds, in the usual ”3+1” picture, to an object, a rod, that is at rest in Sand situated along the e1base vector. The representation of la ABin the {eµ}base is la AB→lµ AB,e=l0 ee0+l1 ee1= 0e0+l0e1,in the/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig base is la AB→l′µ AB,e=−βeγel0e′ 0+γel0e′ 1,in the {rµ}base is la AB→lµ AB,r=−l0r0+l0r1,and in the/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig base is la AB→l′µ AB,r=−Kl0r′ 0+ (1 + βr)(1/K)l0r′ 1,where K= (1 + 2 βr)1/2,and βr=βe/(1−βe). The distance 4-vector la AB=xa B−xa Ais decomposed with respect to {eµ}base as la AB→lµ AB,e=l0 ee0+l1 ee1= 0e0+l0e1, (10) the temporal part of lµ AB,eis chosen to be zero. The spacetime length lis written in the {eµ}base as l=le= (lµ elµe)1/2= (li elie)1/2=l0,as in the prerelativistic physics; it is in that case a measure of the spatial distance, i.e., of the rest spatial length of the rod. The observers in all other IFRs will look at the same events but as sociating with them diﬀerent 9coordinates and they all obtain the same value lfor the spacetime length. The rest frame of the object, and the simultaneity of the events AandBin it,l0 e= 0, are chosen only to have the connection with the prerelativistic physics (and the ”A T relativity”), which deals with ”3+1” quantities and not with 4D quantities. In the ”TT relat ivity,” for the same rod at rest in S, we could take another choice for the 4-vector la AB,e.g., the choice with l0 e/ne}ationslash= 0.The ”TT relativity,” unlike the nonrelativistic theory and the ”AT relativity,” is not interested in the spatial points, the front and the rear ends of the rod, b utin the events AandB in the 4D spacetime. The decomposition of the chosen la ABrelative to the/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig base in S′, (where in the ”3+1” picture the rod is moving) is la AB→l′µ AB,e=−βeγel0e′ 0+γel0e′ 1. (11) Note that there is a dilatation of the spatial part l′1 e=γel0with respect to l1 e=l0and not the Lorentz contraction as predicted in the ”AT relativity. ” Hovewer it is clear from the above discussion that comparison of only spatial parts of th e two representations lµ AB,eand l′µ AB,eof the same physical quantity la ABmeasured in two relatively moving IFRs SandS′ respectively is physically meaningless in the ”TT relativi ty.” The invariant spacetime length of that object in S′isl=l′ e=l0. The distance 4-vector la AB=xa B−xa Ais decomposed with respect to {rµ}base as la AB→lµ AB,r=−l0r0+l0r1, (12) and the TT length lisl=lr=l0,as it must be. In S′and in the/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig basela ABis decomposed as la AB→l′µ AB,r=−Kl0r′ 0+ (1 + βr)(1/K)l0r′ 1. (13) If only spatial parts of lµ AB,randl′µ AB,rare compared than one ﬁnds that ∞ ≻ l′1 r≥l0 for−1/2≺βr≤0 and l0≤l′1 r≺ ∞ for 0≤βr≺ ∞ , which once again shows that such comparison is physically meaningless in the ”TT relati vity.” Hovewer the invariant spacetime length always takes the same value l=l′ r=l0.Thus, as also seen from Fig.1, one and the same geometrical quantity, the 4-vector la AB,is considered in four diﬀerent bases {eµ},/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig ,{rµ}and/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig ,where it is represented by its coordinate representations lµ e, l′µ e, lµ r andl′µ r, respectively. An important conclusion emerges from the whole above consid eration; the usual 3D length of a moving object cannot be deﬁned in the 4 D spacetime of the TT relativity in an adequate way, since it is only the spatial le ngth and not a 4D tensor quantity. 10B. The spacetime length - for a moving clock FIG. 2. The spacetime length for a moving clock. The same geom etrical quantity, the distance 4-vector la AB=xa B−xa Ais decomposed with respect to {eµ},/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig and{rµ},/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig bases. la AB connects the events AandB(the event Arepresents the creation of the muon and the event B represents its decay after the lifetime τ0inS).and it is directed along the e0base vector from the event Atoward the event B.The representation of la ABin the{eµ}base is la AB→lµ AB,e=cτ0e0+0e1, in the/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig base is la AB→l′µ AB,e=γcτ0e′ 0−βγcτ 0e′ 1,in the {rµ}base is la AB→lµ AB,r=cτ0r0+ 0r1, and in the/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig base is la AB→l′µ AB,r=Kcτ0r′ 0−βK−1cτ0r′ 1. Another example, i.e., another particular choice for the 4- vector la AB,is presented in Fig.2. It clearly reveals the fundamental diﬀerence betwee n the ”TT relativity” and the ”AT relativity.” This example can be interpreted as the well kno wn ”muon experiment,” but now considered in the ”TT relativity.” Again, as in the precedin g section, the spacetime length andla ABwill be examined in two relatively moving IFRs SandS′and in two coordinatizations ”e” and ”r” in these IFRs, i.e., in/braceleftBig eµ/bracerightBig ,/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig and{rµ},/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig bases. The Sframe is chosen to be the rest frame of the muon. Two events are considered; th e event Arepresents the creation of the muon and the event Brepresents its decay after the lifetime τ0inS.The position 4-vectors of the events AandBinS,which are now taken to be on the world line of 11a standard clock that is at rest in the origin of S,are decomposed with respect to {eµ}base asxa A→xµ Ae=x0 Aee0+x1 Aee1= 0e0+0e1,andxa B→xµ Be=x0 Bee0+x1 Bee1=cτ0e0+0e1.The distance 4-vector la AB=xa B−xa Athat connects the events AandBis now directed along the e0base vector from the event Atoward the event B.It is decomposed in the components in the{eµ}base as la AB→lµ AB,e=l0 ee0+l1 ee1=cτ0e0+ 0e1. (14) We see that in Sand the {eµ}base the position 4-vectors xa A,Band the distance 4-vector la ABhave only temporal parts, i.e., x1 Be=x1 Ae=l1 e= 0,and the spacetime length lis l=le= (−(l0 e)2)1/2= (−c2τ2 0)1/2; it is a measure of the temporal distance in S, as in the prerelativistic physics, and in this case one can speak abou t the lifetime τ0of the muon. In S′,where this clock (muon) is moving, the position 4-vectors xa Aandxa Bof the events A andB,the creation and the decay of the muon respectively, are deco mposed with respect to/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig base as xa A→x′µ Ae=x′0 Aee′ 0+x′1 Aee′ 1= 0e′ 0+ 0e′ 1,andxa B→x′µ Be=x′0 Bee′ 0+x′1 Bee′ 1= γcτ0e′ 0−βγcτ 0e′ 1,and the distance 4-vector la ABis decomposed as la AB→l′µ AB,e=γcτ0e′ 0−βγcτ 0e′ 1. (15) Now in the/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig basela ABcontains not only the temporal part but also the spatial part and again the comparison of only the temporal parts of the dis tance 4-vector is physically meaningless in the ”TT relativity,” in contrast to the consi deration in the ”AT relativity.” The notion of the time dilatation, which is in the ”AT relativ ity” based on the comparison of only the temporal parts, is meaningless in the ”TT relativit y.” However the correctly deﬁned quantity is again the spacetime length, and in S′this length is l=l′ e=le= (−c2τ2 0)1/2. In a similar way as above we ﬁnd that in the ”r” coordinatizati on the position 4-vectors of the events AandBinSare decomposed in the {rµ}base as xa A→xµ Ar=x0 Arr0+x1 Arr1= 0r0+0r1,andxa B→xµ Br=cτ0r0+0r1,and the distance 4-vector la AB=xa B−xa Ais decomposed as la AB→lµ AB,r=l0 rr0+l1 rr1=cτ0r0+ 0r1, (16) and the TT length lisl=lr=le,as it must be. In S′and in the/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig base the position 4-vectors of the events AandBarexa A→x′µ Ar= 0r′ 0+0r′ 1andxa B→x′µ Br=x′0 Brr′ 0+x′1 Brr′ 1= (1 + 2βr)1/2cτ0r′ 0−βr(1 + 2βr)−1/2cτ0r′ 1, and the components l′µ rof the distance 4-vector la AB are equal to the components x′µ Br, i.e.,l′µ AB,r=x′µ Br.Thus la AB→l′µ AB,r= (1 + 2 βr)1/2cτ0r′ 0−βr(1 + 2 βr)−1/2cτ0r′ 1. (17) Comparing the temporal parts of lµ AB,randl′µ AB,rone ﬁnds that l′0 ris larger than l0 r=cτ0 for 0≺βr≺ ∞,and it is smaller than l0 rfor−1/2≺βr≺0.Speaking in the language of the ”AT relativity” one could say that for the positive βrthere is a ”time dilatation” while for−1/2≺βr≺0 there is a ”time contraction.” Since there is no physical re ason for the preference of one coordinatization over the other we once ag ain conclude that the comparison of only temporal (or spatial) parts of the distance 4-vector s is physically meaningless. This example nicely reveals the untenability of the notions from the ”AT relativity” (the ”Lorentz 12contraction” or the ”time dilatation”) in the ”TT relativit y” as the theory of 4D spacetime with pseudo-Euclidean geometry. However, e.g., the spacet ime length is always correctly deﬁned quantity that takes the same value in both IFRs and in b oth coordinatizations, l=l′ r=lr=l′ e=le; it can be compared in a physically meaningful sense in the ”T T relativity.” We see that the geometrical quantities, the 4-vectors, xa A,B, la ABhave diﬀerent repre- sentations depending on the chosen IFR and the chosen coordi natization of that IFR, e.g., xµ e,r, x′µ e,r. Although the Einstein coordinatization is preferred by ph ysicists due to its simplic- ity and symmetry it is nothing more ”physical” than others, e .g., the ”r” coordinatization. IV. THE AT OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTANCES In this section we consider the same two examples as above but now from the point of view of the conventional, i.e., Einstein’s [10] interpre tations of the spatial length of the moving rod and the temporal distance for the moving clock. A. The AT of the spatial distance or the Lorentz ”contraction ” The AT of the spatial distance is already considered in detai l in [2] and therefore, here, we only quote the main results and the deﬁnitions, and also illu strate the whole consideration by Fig.3. The same example, a rod at rest in S,is pictured in Fig.1 when treated in the ”TT relativity,” and in Fig.3 when treated in the ”AT relativ ity.” It is mentioned in [2] that the synchronous deﬁnition of the spatial length , introduced by Einstein [10], deﬁnes length as the spatial distance between two spatial points on the (moving) object measured by simultaneity in the rest frame of the observer. 13FIG. 3. The AT of the spatial length - the Lorentz ”contractio n” of the moving rod. The spatial distance l1 ABe=x1 Be−x1 Ae=l1 e=l0deﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, the spatia l length of the rod at rest in S,while l′1 CDe=x′1 De−x′1 Ce=l′1 eis considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, to deﬁne the spatial length of the moving rod i nS′. l′1 eandl1 e=l0are connected by the formulae for the Lorentz contraction of the moving rod l′1 e=l0/γe,witht′ Ce=t′ De=t′ e=b andtBe=tAe=te=a. ainSandbinS′are not related by the LT or any other coordinate transformation. Likewise in the ”r” base, the spatial dista ncel1 EFr=x1 Fr−x1 Erdeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity” the spatial length of the rod at rest in S,while l′1 GHr=x′1 Hr−x′1 Grdeﬁnes the spatial length of the moving rod in S′.l′1 r=l′1 GHrandl1 r=l1 EFr=l0are connected by the formulae for the Lorentz ”contraction” of the moving rod in the ”r” bas el′1 r=l0/Kwithx′0 Hr=x′0 Grand x0 Fr=x0 Er.In the ”r” base there is a length dilatation ∞ ≻l′1 r≻l0for−1/2≺βr≺0 and the standard ”length contraction” l0≻l′1 r≻0 for positive βr,which clearly shows that the ”Lorentz contraction” is not physically correctly deﬁned transform ation. In the ”AT relativity” all four spatial lengths l1 e, l′1 e, l1 r, l′1 rare considered as the same quantity for diﬀerent observers, but, in fact, they are four diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime, and they are not connected by the Lorentz transformation. Then, as explained in [2], the spatial distance l1 ABe=x1 Be−x1 Aedeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, the spatial length of the ro d at rest in S,while l′1 CDe= 14x′1 De−x′1 Ceis considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, to d eﬁne the spatial length of the moving rod in S′,see also Fig.3. From these deﬁnitions and considering only the transformation of the spatial part l1 ABeof the distance 4-vector (in the ”e” base) lµ ABe= xµ Be−xµ Ae= (0, l0) one ﬁnds the relation between l′1 e=l′1 CDeandl1 e=l1 ABe=l0(see [2]) as the famous formulae for the Lorentz contraction of the movin g rod l′1 e=x′1 De−x′1 Ce=l0/γe= (x1 Be−x1 Ae)(1−β2 e)1/2, t′ Ce=t′ De, tBe=tAe, (18) where βe=ve/c,veis the relative velocity of SandS′.We see that the spatial lengths l1 e=l0andl′1 e=l0/γerefer not to the same 4D tensor quantity, as in the ”TT relativ ity,” but to two diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime. These quanti ties are obtained by the same measurements in SandS′; the spatial ends of the rod are measured simultaneously at s ome te=ainSand also at some t′ e=binS′,andainSandbinS′are not related by the LT or any other coordinate transformation. The Lorentz ”contraction” in the ”r” coordinatization is al so considered in [2] and pic- tured in Fig.3 here. The spatial ends of the considered rod, w hich is at rest in S,must be taken simultaneously in the ”r” coordinatization too. Thus , in the ”r” base, they must lie on the light line, i.e., on the x1 raxis (that is along the spatial base vector r1). The simultaneous events EandF(whose spatial parts correspond to the spatial ends of the ro d) are the intersections of the x1 raxis and the world lines of the spatial ends of the rod. The eve ntsE andFare not the same events as the events AandB,considered in the ”e” base for the same rod at rest in S,since the simultaneity of the events is deﬁned in diﬀerent wa ys, see Fig.3. Therefore, in 4D spacetime the spatial length in the ” r” base l1 r=l0(with x0 Fr=x0 Er) is not the same 4D quantity as the spatial length in the ”e” bas el1 e=l0(with x0 Be=x0 Ae). Applying the same procedure as in [2] one ﬁnds that in the ”r” base, the spatial distance l1 EFr=x1 Fr−x1 Erdeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity” the spatial length of the rod at rest in S, while l′1 GHr=x′1 Hr−x′1 Grdeﬁnes the spatial length of the moving rod in S′,see Fig.3. Using these deﬁnitions one ﬁnds the relation between l′1 r=l′1 GHrandl1 r=l1 EFr=l0as the Lorentz ”contraction” of the moving rod in the ”r” base l′1 r=x′1 Hr−x′1 Gr=l0/K= (1/K)(x1 Fr−x1 Er), x′0 Hr=x′0 Gr, x0 Fr=x0 Er. (19) In contrast to the ”e” coordinatization we ﬁnd that in the ”r” base there is a length dilatation ∞ ≻ l′1 r≻l0for−1/2≺βr≺0 and the standard length ”contraction” l0≻l′1 r≻0 for positive βr,which clearly shows that the ”Lorentz contraction” is not ph ysically correctly deﬁned transformation. At the beginning of Sec.2 we have stated that the main diﬀeren ce between the ”TT relativity” and the ”AT relativity” stems from the diﬀerenc e in the concept of sameness of a physical quantity for diﬀerent observers. This statement becomes clear when we compare Fig.1 and Fig. 3 and the considerations performed in Sec.3.1 . and in this one. From Fig.1 and Sec.3.1. we see that in the ”TT relativity” the same quantity for diﬀerent observ ers is the geometrical quantity, the 4-vector la AB;only one quantity in 4D spacetime. On the other hand from Fig.3 and the discussion in this section we see that in the ”AT relativity” all four spatial lengths l1 e, l′1 e, l1 r, l′1 rare considered as the same quantity for diﬀerent observers, but they are actually four diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime. 15Thus we conclude that - the Lorentz contraction is the transformation that connect s diﬀerent quantities (in 4D spacetime) in diﬀerent IFRs, whi ch shows that it belongs to - the AT. B. The AT of the temporal distance or the time ”dilatation” In the ”AT relativity” one can speak not only about the spatia l distance but also about the temporal distance, and they are considered as well deﬁne d quantities. In Fig.4 we present the same ”muon experiment” as in Fig.2. 16FIG. 4. The AT of the temporal distance - the ”dilatation” of t ime for the moving clock. The temporal distance l0 ABe=l0 edeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, the muon li fetime at rest, while l′0 ADe=l′0 eis considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, to d eﬁne the lifetime of the moving muon in S′.The quantities l′0 eandl0 eare connected by the relation for the time dilatation, l′0 e/c=t′ e=γel0 e/c=τ0(1−β2 e)−1/2,withx1 Be=x1 Ae.Likewise, the temporal distance l0 ABr=l0 rdeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”r” base, the muon li fetime at rest, while l′0 AHr=l′0 ris considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”r” base, to d eﬁne the lifetime of the moving muon in S′. l′0 randl0 rare connected by the relation for the time ”dilatation” in the ”r” base l′0 r=Kl0 r= (1 + 2 βr)1/2cτ0.The temporal separation l′0 rinS′,where the clock is moving, is smaller - ”time contraction” - than the temporal s eparation l0 r=cτ0inS,where the clock is at rest, for −1/2≺βr≺0,and it is larger - ”time dilatation” - for 0 ≺βr≺ ∞. The ”AT relativity” considers the temporal distances l0 e, l′0 e, l0 r, l′0 ras the same quantity for diﬀerent observers. However these temporal distances are really diﬀ erent quantities in 4D spacetime, and they are not connected by the Lorentz transformations. Instead of to work with geometrical quantities xa A,B, la ABandlone deals, in the ”AT relativity,” only with the spatial, or temporal, parts of th eir coordinate representations xµ Ae,r, xµ Be,randlµ e,r.First the ”e” coordinatization, which is almost always used in the ”AT relativity,” is considered here. In 4D (at us 2D) spacetime a nd in the ”e” coordinatization the events AandBare again on the world line of a muon that is at rest in S. The distance 4-vector (in the ”e” base) is lµ ABe=xµ Be−xµ Ae= (cτ0,0).Further one uses the Lorentz transformations to express x′µ Ae, x′µ Be,andl′µ ABeinS′, in which the muon is moving, in terms of the corresponding quantities in S. This procedure yields x′0 A,Be=ct′ A,Be= γe(ctA,Be−βex1 A,Be),andx′1 A,Be=γe(βectA,Be−x1 A,Be),whence l′0 ABe=ct′ Be−ct′ Ae=γe(ctBe−ctAe)−γeβe(x1 Be−x1 Ae) l′1 ABe=x′1 Be−x′1 Ae=γe(x1 Be−x1 Ae)−γeβe(ctBe−ctAe). Now comes the main diﬀerence between the two forms of relativ ity. Instead of to work with 4D tensor quantities and their LT (as in the ”TT relativi ty”) in the ”AT relativity” the temporal part alone l0 ABe=cτ0oflµ ABeis considered as a well-deﬁned quantity, and it deﬁnes the muon lifetime at rest. The existence of the spatia l part l1 ABeoflµ ABeis in this case completely neglected; one forgets the transformation of th e spatial part l1 ABeand considers only the transformation of the temporal part l0 ABe.However, in the 4D (at us 2D) spacetime such an assumption means that in S′one actually does not consider the same events A andBas inSbut some other two events CandD(in fact, in this speciﬁc example, the events AandD), see Fig.4. Then in the above transformation for l0 ABeone has to write x′0 De−x′0 Ae=l′0 ADeinstead of x′0 Be−x′0 Ae=l′0 ABe.As we said the temporal distance l0 ABe=l0 e deﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, the muon li fetime at rest, while l′0 ADe=l′0 e is considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, to d eﬁne the lifetime of the moving muon in S′.Taking that x1 Be=x1 Aein the equation for l′0 eone ﬁnds the well-known relation for the time dilatation, l′0 e/c=t′ e=γel0 e/c=τ0(1−β2 e)−1/2,withx1 Be=x1 Ae. (20) 17As seen from Fig.4 the relation (20) connects two diﬀerent qu antities (in 4D spacetime) - the temporal parts of lµ ABeandl′µ ABe,i.e., the temporal parts of the {eµ}and/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig representations of the distance 4-vector la AB; the quantities l0 eandl′0 eare diﬀerent and, in fact, independent quantities in 4D spacetime, which are not connected by the Lo rentz transformation. In the ”r” coordinatization, see Fig.4., the {rµ}representation of the distance 4-vector islµ ABr=xµ Br−xµ Ar= (cτ0,0).By means of the LT (3), when written in the {rµ}base, we transform lµ ABrtol′µ ABrand ﬁnd the relations l′0 ABr=x′0 Br−x′0 Ar=K(x0 Br−x0 Ar) =Kcτ0, l′1 ABr=x′1 Br−x′1 Ar= (−βr/K)(x0 Br−x0 Ar) + (1/K)(x1 Br−x1 Ar). Further, in the ”r” base, one again forgets the transformati on of the spatial part l1 ABroflµ ABr. In the same way as in the ”e” base, in 4D (at us 2D) spacetime, su ch an assumption means that in S′one actually does not consider the same events AandBas inSbut some other two events GandH,(in this particular example, the events AandH), see Fig.4. Then in the above transformation for l0 ABr=l0 rone has to write l′0 AHrinstead of l′0 ABr; the temporal distance l0 ABr=l0 rdeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”r” base, the muon li fetime at rest, while l′0 AHr=l′0 ris considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”r” base, to d eﬁne the lifetime of the moving muon in S′.The relation for the time ”dilatation” in the ”r” base becomes l′0 r=Kl0 r= (1 + 2 βr)1/2cτ0. (21) Again, as seen from Fig.4, the relation (21) connects two diﬀ erent quantities (in 4D space- time) - the temporal parts of lµ ABrandl′µ ABr,i.e., the temporal parts of the {rµ}and/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig representations of the distance 4-vector la AB; the quantities l0 randl′0 rare diﬀerent and, in fact, independent quantities in 4D spacetime, which are not connected by the Lorentz trans- formation. We see from (21) that the temporal separation l′0 rinS′,where the clock is moving, is smaller - ”time contraction” - than the temporal s eparation l0 r=cτ0inS,where the clock is at rest, for −1/2≺βr≺0,and it is larger - ”time dilatation” - for 0 ≺βr≺ ∞. In numerous papers and books the time dilatation given by (20 ) is considered as a funda- mental relativistic eﬀect, but as shown by the relation (21) the eﬀect depends on the chosen coordinatizations, and as such cannot be the fundamental eﬀ ect. In addition, we point out that from the point of view of the ”TT relativity” such transf ormations that transform only some parts of 4D tensor quantities, and completely negl ect the transformations of the remaining parts, are physically meaningless. From Fig.2 and Sec.3.2. we see that in the ”TT relativity” the same quantity for diﬀerent observers is the geometrical quantity, the 4-vector la AB;only one quantity in 4D spacetime. However from Fig.4 and this section we reveal that in the ”AT relativity” diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime, the temporal distances l0 e, l′0 e, l0 r, l′0 r,are considered as the same quantity for diﬀerent observers. One concludes from the above discussion that both the Lorentz ”contraction” and the time ”dilatation” are the transformations connecting diﬀe rent quantities (in 4D spacetime) in diﬀerent IFRs, and they both change the inﬁnitesimal spac etime distance ds,i.e., the pseudo-Euclidean geometry of the 4D spacetime (this is explicitly shown in [2] for the Lorentz 18”contraction,” and also it can be easily shown for the time ”d ilatation”). Such characteristics of the Lorentz ”contraction” and the time ”dilatation” as th e coordinate transformations show that both transformations belong to - the AT. V. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION As shown in this paper the two forms of relativity the ”TT rela tivity” and the ”AT rel- ativity” are substantially diﬀerent theories. The concept ofsameness of a physical quantity for diﬀerent observers makes clear distinction between the two considered forms of relativity. In the ”TT relativity” the same quantity for diﬀerent observ ers is the geometrical quantity, only one quantity in 4D spacetime; in the case considered in t his paper it is the 4-vector la AB, (or the spacetime length l, the Lorentz scalar), as seen from Figs.1 and 2. In contrast t o the ”TT relativity” the traditionally used ”AT relativity, ” considers diﬀerent spatial lengths l1 e, l′1 e, l1 r, l′1 r,Fig.3 (the temporal distances l0 e, l′0 e, l0 r, l′0 r,Fig.4) as the same quantity for diﬀerent observers. However, as seen from Fig.3 (Fig.4) the spatial lengths l1 e, l′1 e, l1 r, l′1 r(the temporal distances l0 e, l′0 e, l0 r, l′0 r) are really diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime, which are not connected by the Lorentz transformations Lab(3),i.e., the quantities l1 eandl′1 e(l0 eand l′0 e) are not connected by Lµν,e,norl1 randl′1 r(l0 randl′0 r) are connected by Lµν,r(Lµν,eand Lµν,rare the representations of Labin the ”e” and ”r” coordinatizations, see Sec.3). Also, neither the quantities l1 eandl1 r,etc., are connected by the coordinate transformation Tµ ν, which transforms the ”e” coordinatization to the ”r” coordi natization, see Sec.3. The consideration of the spacetime length (the ”TT relativi ty”) Sec.3, and of the spatial and temporal distances as well-deﬁned quantities (the ”AT r elativity”) Sec.4, reveals that only the ”TT relativity” is in a complete agreement with the s pecial relativity as the theory of 4D spacetime with pseudo-Euclidean geometry; when the 4D structure of our spacetime is correctly taken into account as in the ”TT relativity” the n there is no place either for the Lorentz ”contraction” or for the time ”dilatation,” i.e ., there is no place for the ”AT relativity.” 19REFERENCES [1] T.Ivezi´ c, Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 105 (1999). [2] T.Ivezi´ c, Found. Phys. Lett. 12, (1999). [3] T Ivezi´ c, preprint SCAN-9802018 (on the CERN server). [4] F. Rohrlich, Nuovo Cimento B 45, 76 (1966). [5] A. Gamba, Am. J. Phys. 35, 83 (1967). [6] D.E. Fahnline, Am. J. Phys. 50, 818 (1982). [7] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. (Wile y, New York, 1977). [8] T.Ivezi´ c, preprint SCAN-9802017 (on the CERN server). [9] T.Ivezi´ c, preprint SCAN-9810078 (on the CERN server). [10] A. Einstein, Ann. Physik 17,891 (1905), tr. by W. Perrett and G.B. Jeﬀery, in The principle of relativity (Dover, New York). [11] R.M. Wald, General relativity (The University of Chica go Press, Chicago, 1984). [12] A.A. Logunov, Lectures in the theory of relativity and g ravity. A present-day analysis of the problem (Nauka, Moskva, 1987) (in Russian). [13] F. Rohrlich, Phys. Rev. D 25, 3251 (1982). [14] C. Leubner, K. Auﬁnger and P. Krumm, Eur. J. Phys. 13,170 (1992). [15] R. Anderson, I. Vetharaniam, G.E. Stedman, Phys. Rep. 295, 93 (1998). 20FIGURE CAPTIONS Fig.1. The spacetime length for a moving rod. In the ”TT relat ivity” the same quantity for diﬀerent observers is the geometrical quantity, the distan ce 4-vector la AB=xa B−xa A; only onequantity in 4D spacetime. It is decomposed with respect to {eµ},/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig and{rµ},/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig bases. The bases {eµ},/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig refer to Einstein’s coordinatization of two relatively mov ing IFRs SandS′,and the bases {rµ},/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig refer to the ”radio” coordinatization of Sand S′. la ABcorresponds, in the usual ”3+1” picture, to an object, a rod, that is at rest in Sand situated along the e1base vector. The representation of la ABin the {eµ}base is la AB→lµ AB,e=l0 ee0+l1 ee1= 0e0+l0e1,in the/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig base is la AB→l′µ AB,e=−βeγel0e′ 0+γel0e′ 1, in the {rµ}base is la AB→lµ AB,r=−l0r0+l0r1,and in the/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig base is la AB→l′µ AB,r= −Kl0r′ 0+ (1 + βr)(1/K)l0r′ 1,where K= (1 + 2 βr)1/2,andβr=βe/(1−βe). Fig.2. The spacetime length for a moving clock. The same geom etrical quantity, the distance 4-vector la AB=xa B−xa Ais decomposed with respect to {eµ},/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig and{rµ},/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig bases. la AB connects the events AandB(the event Arepresents the creation of the muon and the event Brepresents its decay after the lifetime τ0inS).and it is directed along the e0base vector from the event Atoward the event B.The representation of la ABin the {eµ}base is la AB→lµ AB,e=cτ0e0+ 0e1,in the/braceleftBig e′ µ/bracerightBig base is la AB→l′µ AB,e=γcτ0e′ 0−βγcτ 0e′ 1,in the {rµ} base is la AB→lµ AB,r=cτ0r0+0r1,and in the/braceleftBig r′ µ/bracerightBig base is la AB→l′µ AB,r=Kcτ0r′ 0−βK−1cτ0r′ 1. Fig.3. The AT of the spatial length - the Lorentz ”contractio n” of the moving rod. The spatial distance l1 ABe=x1 Be−x1 Ae=l1 e=l0deﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, the spatial length of the rod at rest in S,while l′1 CDe=x′1 De−x′1 Ce=l′1 eis considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, to deﬁne the spatial length of the moving rod in S′. l′1 eandl1 e=l0are connected by the formulae for the Lorentz contraction of the moving rodl′1 e=l0/γe,witht′ Ce=t′ De=t′ e=bandtBe=tAe=te=a. ainSandbinS′are not related by the LT or any other coordinate transformation . Likewise in the ”r” base, the spatial distance l1 EFr=x1 Fr−x1 Erdeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity” the spatial length of the rod at rest in S,while l′1 GHr=x′1 Hr−x′1 Grdeﬁnes the spatial length of the moving rod in S′. l′1 r=l′1 GHrandl1 r=l1 EFr=l0are connected by the formulae for the Lorentz ”contraction” of the moving rod in the ”r” base l′1 r=l0/Kwithx′0 Hr=x′0 Grandx0 Fr=x0 Er.In the ”r” base there is a length dilatation ∞ ≻l′1 r≻l0for−1/2≺βr≺0 and the standard ”length contraction” l0≻l′1 r≻0 for positive βr,which clearly shows that the ”Lorentz contraction” is not physically correctly deﬁned transformation. In the ” AT relativity” all four spatial lengths l1 e, l′1 e, l1 r, l′1 rare considered as the same quantity for diﬀerent observers, but, in fact, they are four diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime, and they a re not connected by the Lorentz transformation. Fig.4. The AT of the temporal distance - the ”dilatation” of t ime for the moving clock. The temporal distance l0 ABe=l0 edeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, the muon lifetime at rest, while l′0 ADe=l′0 eis considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”e” base, to deﬁne the lifetime of the moving muon in S′.The quantities l′0 eandl0 eare connected by the relation for the time dilatation, l′0 e/c=t′ e=γel0 e/c=τ0(1−β2 e)−1/2,withx1 Be=x1 Ae. Likewise, the temporal distance l0 ABr=l0 rdeﬁnes in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”r” base, 21the muon lifetime at rest, while l′0 AHr=l′0 ris considered in the ”AT relativity,” and in the ”r” base, to deﬁne the lifetime of the moving muon in S′. l′0 randl0 rare connected by the relation for the time ”dilatation” in the ”r” base l′0 r=Kl0 r= (1 + 2 βr)1/2cτ0.The temporal separation l′0 rinS′,where the clock is moving, is smaller - ”time contraction” - t han the temporal separation l0 r=cτ0inS,where the clock is at rest, for −1/2≺βr≺0,and it is larger - ”time dilatation” - for 0 ≺βr≺ ∞. The ”AT relativity” considers the temporal distances l0 e, l′0 e, l0 r, l′0 ras the same quantity for diﬀerent observers. However these t emporal distances are really diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime, a nd they are not connected by the Lorentz transformations. 22
arXiv:physics/0007031v1 [physics.class-ph] 11 Jul 2000TRUE TRANSFORMATIONS OF SPACETIME LENGTHS AND APPARENT TRANSFORMATIONS OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTANCES. II. THE COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTS Tomislav Ivezi´ c Ruder Boˇ skovi´ c Institute, P.O.B. 180, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia ivezic@rudjer.irb.hr Some of the well-known experiments: the ”muon” experiment, the Michelson-Morley type experiments, the Kennedy-Thorndike type experiments and the Ives-Stilwell type ex- periments are analyzed using the nonrelativistic theory, t he ”apparent transformations (AT) relativity” and the ”true transformations (TT) relativity .” It is shown that all the experi- ments (when they are complete from the ”TT relativity” viewp oint) are in agreement with the ”TT relativity” in which the special relativity is under stood as the theory of a four- dimensional spacetime with the pseudo-Euclidean geometry . It is also explicitly shown that, in contrast to the usual opinion, the commonly used ”AT relat ivity” does not always agree with experiments. The concept of sameness of a physical quan tity is essential for the dis- tinction between the two forms of relativity both in the theo ry and in experiments. The diﬀerence in this concept causes the agreement of the ”TT rel ativity” with the experiments and the disagreement of the ”AT relativity.” PACS number(s): 03.30.+p 1Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality. H. Minkowski A quantity is therefore physically meaningful (in the sense that it is of the same nature to all observers) if it has tensorial properties under Lorentz transformations. F. Rohrlich I. INTRODUCTION In [1], [2] and [3] (this paper will be referred as [ I]), (see also [4]), two forms of relativity are discussed, the ”true transformations (TT) relativity” and the ”apparent transformations (AT) relativity.” The notions of the TT and the AT are ﬁrst int roduced by Rohrlich [5], and, in the same meaning, but not under that name, discussed in [6] too. The general theoretical discussion of the diﬀerence between the ”TT relativity” and the ”AT relativity” is given in detail in [ I]. There (in [ I]) we have also presented the theoretical discussion of the T T of the spacetime length for a moving rod and a moving clock, an d of the AT for the same examples, i.e., the AT of the spatial distance, the Lorentz ” contraction,” and the AT of the temporal distance, the time ”dilatation.” In this paper we u se theoretical results from [ I] and compare them with some experimental results. II. GENERAL DISCUSSION OF THE COMPARISON It is usually interpreted that the experiments on ”length co ntraction” and ”time dilata- tion” test the special relativity, but the discussion from [ I] shows that such an interpretation of the experiments refers to - the ”AT relativity,” and not to - the ”TT relativity.” It has to be noted that in the experiments in the ”TT relativit y,” in the same way as in the theory, see [ I], the measurements in diﬀerent inertial frames of referenc e (IFRs) (and diﬀerent coordinatizations) have to refer to the same f our-dimensional (4D) tensor quantity. In the chosen IFR and the chosen coordinatization the measurement of some 4D quantity has to contain the measurements of all parts of su ch a quantity. However in almost all experiments that refer to the special relativity only the quantities belonging to the ”AT relativity” were measured. From the ”TT relativity” viewpoint such measurements are incomplete, since only some parts of a 4D quantity, not al l, are measured. This fact presents a serious diﬃculty in the reliable comparison of th e existing experiments with the ”TT relativity,” and, actually, we shall be able to compare i n a quantitative manner only some of the existing experiments with the ”TT relativity.” To examine the diﬀerences between the nonrelativistic theo ry, the commonly used ”AT relativity,” and the ”TT relativity” we shall make the compa rison of these theories with some experiments in the following sections. III. THE ”MUON” EXPERIMENT First we shall examine an experiment in which diﬀerent resul ts will be predicted for diﬀerent synchronizations in the conventional approach to relativity, i.e., in the ”AT rela- tivity,” but of course the same results for all synchronizat ions will be obtained in the ”TT 2relativity.” This is the ”muon” experiment, which is alread y theoretically discussed from the ”TT relativity” viewpoint in Sec. 3.2 in [ I] and from the ”AT relativity” viewpoint in Sec. 4.2 in [ I].The ”muon” experiment is quoted in almost every text-book on general physics, see, e.g., [7] and [8]. Moreover, an experiment [9] was the ba sis for a ﬁlm often shown in introductory modern physics courses: ”Time dilation: An ex periment with µmesons.” Re- cently, in [10], a version of such an experiment is presented , and it required travelling to mountains of moderate heights of around 600 m. In these experiments, [9] and [10], the ﬂuxes of muons on a mou ntain, Nm, and at sea level,Ns, are measured, and the number of muons which decayed in ﬂight is determined from their diﬀerence. Also the distribution of the decay times is measured for the case when the muons are at rest, giving a lifetime τof approximately 2 .2µs.The rate of decay of muons at rest, i.e., in the muon frame, is compared with their rate of d ecay in ﬂight, i.e., in the Earth frame. In [9] high-velocity muons are used, which causes tha t the fractional energy loss of the muons in the atmosphere is negligible, making it a consta nt velocity problem, while in [10] one deals with a variable velocity problem. The discuss ion of the ”muon” experiment in [I] referred to the decay of only one particle. When the real exp eriments are considered, as are [9] and [10], then we use data on the decay of many such ra dioactive particles and the characteristic quantities are avareged over many singl e decay events. A. The nonrelativistic approach In the nonrelativistic theory the space and time are separat ed. The coordinate transfor- mations connecting the Earth frame and the muon frame are the Galilean transformations giving that tE, the travel time from the mountain to sea level when measured in the Earth frame, is the same as tµ, which is the elapsed time for the same travelling but measur ed in the moving frame of the muon, tE=tµ. Also, in the nonrelativistic theory, the lifetimes of muons in the mentioned two frames are equal, τE=τµ=τ.Muon counts on the mountain Nm,and at sea level Ns,as experimentally determined numbers, must not depend on th e frame in which they are measured and on the chosen coordinati zation. This result, i.e., that Nsµ=NsE=NsandNmµ=NmE=Nm,has to be obtained not only in the nonrelativistic theory but also in the ”AT relativity” and in the ”TT relativi ty.” The diﬀerential equation for the radioctive-decay processes in the nonrelativistic theory can be written as dN/dt =−λN, N s=Nmexp(−t/τ). (1) The travel time tEis not directly measured by clocks, than, in the Earth frame, it is de- termined as the ratio of the height of the mountain HEand the velocity of the muons v, tE=HE/v.The equation (1) holds in the Earth frame and in the muon frame too, since the two frames are connected by the Galilean transformation s, and, as mentioned above, the corresponding times are equal, tE=tµandτE=τµ.Hence we conclude that in the nonrelativistic theory the exponential factors are the sam e in both frames and consequently the corresponding ﬂuxes in the two frames are equal, Nsµ=NsEandNmµ=NmE, as it must be. However the experiments show that the actual ﬂux at sea le vel is much higher than that expected from such a nonrelativistic calculation, and thus the nonrelativistic theory does not agree with the experimental results. 3B. The ”AT relativity” approach In the ”AT relativity” diﬀerent physical phenomena in diﬀer ent IFRs must be invoked to explain the measured values of the ﬂuxes; the time ”dilatati on” is used in the Earth frame, but in the muon frame one explains the data by means of the Lore ntz ”contraction.” In order to exploit the results of Secs. 3.2 and 4.2 in [ I] we analyse the ”muon” experiment not only in the ”e” coordinatization but also in the ”r” coord inatization. As shown in Sec.4 in [I] the ”AT relativity” considers that the spatial and tempora l parts of the spacetime length are well-deﬁned physical quantities in 4D spacetime . (But, of course, Sec.4 in [ I] also reveals that such an assumption holds only in the Einstein co ordinatization, i.e., in the ”e” base, see [ I].) Then, as in the nonrelativistic theory, the equation for the radioactive-decay in the ”AT relativity” can be written as dN/dx0=−λN, N s=Nmexp(−λx0). (2) The equation (2) contains a speciﬁc coordinate, the x0coordinate, which means that the equation (2) will not remain unchanged upon the Lorentz tran sformation, i.e., it will not have the same form in diﬀerent IFRs (and also in diﬀerent coordina tizations). But in the ”AT relativity” it is not required that the physical quantities must be the 4D tensor quantities that correctly transform upon the Lorentz transformations . Thus the quantities in (2) are not the 4D tensor quantities, which actually causes that diﬀ erent phenomena in diﬀerent IFRs have to be invoked to explain the same physical eﬀect, i. e., the same experimental data. In the Earth frame and in the ”e” base we can write in (2) that x0 E=ctE, λE= 1/cτE,which gives that the radioactive-decay law becomes NsE=NmEexp(−tE/τE).In the experiments [9] and [10] NsE, NmE,andtE=HE/vare measured in the Earth frame (tacitly assuming the ”e” coordinatization). However the lifetime of muons is measured in their rest frame. Now, in contrast to the nonrelativistic theory where τE=τµandtE=tµ,the ”AT relativity” assumes that in the ”e” base there is the time ”dilatation” de termined by Eq.(20) in Sec.4.2 in [I], which gives the connection between the lifetimes of muons in the Earth frame τEand the measured lifetime in the muon frame τµas τE=γτµ. (3) Using that relation one ﬁnds that the radioactive-decay law , when expressed in terms of the measured quantities, becomes NsE=NmEexp(−tE/τE) =NmEexp(−tE/γτµ). (4) This equation is used in [9] to make the ”relativistic” calcu lation and compare it with the experimental data. In fact, in [9], the comparison is made be tween the predicted time dilatation factor γof the muons and an observed γ.The predicted γis 8.4±2,while the observed γis found to be 8 .8±0.8, which is a convincing agreement. The prediction of γis made from the measured energies of muons on the mountain an d at sea level; these energies are determined from the measured amount of materia l which muons penetrated when stopped, and then the energies are converted to the spee ds of the muons using the relativistic relation between the total energy and the spee d. The observed γis determined 4from the relation (4), where the measured rates were NsE= 397 ±9 and NmE= 550 ±10, and the measured height of the mountain is HE= 1907 m.The lifetime of muons τµin the muon frame is taken as the information from other experim ents (in order to obtain more accurate result) and it is τµ= 2.211·10−6s.In [10] the relation for the ”relativistic” calculation is written as Ns=Nmexp(−tµ/τµ) =Nmexp(−tE/(γτµ)),Eq.(2) in [10], which shows that the time dilatation is taken into account by the re lation tµ=tE/γ(the same can be concluded from Eqs.(6) and (7) in [10]). For a given mea sured ﬂux NsEof muons at sea level, NsE= 95±10,the expected ﬂux on the mountain is determined from a nonrelativistic calculation, Eq.(1), and from a ”relativi stic” calculation, Eq.(4), i.e., their Eq.(2). The comparison is made between these expected ﬂuxes and the measured counts on the mountain. The predicted counts on the mountain ignoring time dilatation (from (1)) = 330±60; predicted counts on the mountain taking into account tim e dilatation (from (4)) = 190 ±20; measured counts on the mountain = 183 ,and diﬀerent error bars are reported for this measured counts. We see that the nonrelativistic ca lculation does not agree with the experimentally found numbers, while the ”AT relativity ” calculation (made in the ”e” base) shows a very convincing agreement with measured ﬂuxes . Let us now see how the experiments are interpreted in the muon frame. (We note that both [9] and [10] compared the theory (the ”AT relativity”) a nd the experiments only in the Earth frame, but using τµfrom the muon frame.) First we have to ﬁnd the form of the law for the radioactive-decay processes (2) in the muon f rame. As considered above the radioactive-decay law NsE=NmEexp(−tE/τE) in the Earth frame and in the ”e” base is obtained from the equation (2) using the relations x0 E=ctEandλE= 1/cτE.But, as already said, the equation (2) does not remain unchanged upo n the Lorentz transformation and accordingly it cannot have the same form in the Earth fram e and in the muon frame. So, actually, in the 4D spacetime, the equation for the radio active-decay processes in the muon frame could have, in principle, a diﬀerent functional f orm than the equation (4), which describes the same radioactive- decay processes in the Eart h frame. However, in the ”AT relativity,” despite of the fact that the quantities in the E arth frame and in the muon frame are not connected by the Lorentz transformations, the equat ion for the radioactive-decay processes in the muon frame is obtained from the equation (2) in the same way as in the Earth frame, i.e., writting that x0 µ=ctµ,andλµ= 1/cτµ,(as seen in Eq.(2) in [10], the relation for the ”relativistic” calculation), whence Nsµ=Nmµexp(−tµ/τµ). (5) The justiﬁcation for such a procedure can be done in the follo wing way. In the ”AT relativity” the principle of relativity acts as some sort of ”Deus ex mach ina,” which resolves problems; the relation (2) is proclaimed to be the physical law and the principle of relativity requir es that a physical law must have the same form in diﬀerent IFRs. ( This is the usual way in which the principle of relativity is understood in the ”AT re lativity.”) Therefore, one can write in the equation (2) that x0 E=ctEandλE= 1/cτEin the Earth frame and x0 µ=ctµ, andλµ= 1/cτµin the muon frame. With such substitutions the form of the law is the same in both frames, as it is required by the principle of rela tivity. Then, as we have already seen, when the consideration is done in the Earth fra me, the relation (3) for the time dilatation is used to connect quantities in two frames, .instead of to connect them by the Lorentz transformations. When the consideration is perfor med in the muon frame another 5relation is invoked to connect quantities in two frames. Nam ely it is considered in the ”AT relativity” that in the muon frame the mountain is moving and the muon ”sees” the height of the mountain Lorentz contracted, Hµ=HE/γ, (6) which is Eq.(18), Sec.4.1 in [ I],for the Lorentz contraction, giving that tµ=Hµ/v=HE/γv=tE/γ. (7) This leads to the same exponential factor in Eq.(5) as that on e in the Earth frame in Eq.(4), exp(−tµ/τµ) = exp( −tE/(γτµ)).From that result it is concluded that in the ”AT relativity” and in the ”e” base the corresponding ﬂuxes are equal in the tw o frames, Nsµ=NsE=Ns andNmµ=NmE=Nm.Strictly speaking, it is not the mentioned equality of ﬂuxes , but the equality of ratios of ﬂuxes, NsE/NmE=Nsµ/Nmµ, which follows from the equality of the exponential factors in (4) and (5). Both [9] and [10] comp ared the theory (the ”AT relativity”) and the experiments only in the Earth frame, bu t using τµfrom the muon frame. In [9] the time tµthat the muons spent in ﬂight according to their own clocks wa s inferred from the measured distribution of decay times of mu ons at rest, and in [10] tEand tµare calculated by a simple computer program using the known r elation for the mean rate of energy loss of the muons as they travel from the mountain to the sea level and dissipate their energy in the medium (such program is necessary since i n [10] one deals with a variable velocity problem).) Since the predicted ﬂuxes NsEandNmEare in a satisfactory agreement with the measured ones, and since the theory (which deals wit h the time dilatation and the Lorentz contraction) predicts their independence on th e chosen frame, it is generally accepted that the ”AT relativity” correctly explains the me asured data. The above comparison is worked out only in the ”e” coordinati zation, but the physics demands that the independence of the ﬂuxes on the chosen fram e must hold in all coordi- natizations. Therefore we now discuss the experiments [9] a nd [10] from the point of view of the ”AT relativity” but in the ”r” coordinatization, see [ I]. Then, using Eq.(2), we can write the relation for the ﬂuxes in the ”r” base and in the Eart h frame as Nr,sE=Nr,mEexp(−λr,Ex0 r,E) =Nr,mEexp(−x0 r,E/x0 r,E(τE)), where x0 r,E(τE) = 1/λr,E.Again, as in the ”e” base, we have to express x0 r,E(τE) in the Earth frame in terms of the measured quantity x0 r,µ(τµ) using the relation (21) from [ I] for the time ”dilatation” in the ”r” base, x0 r,E(τE) = (1 + 2 βr)1/2cτµ. Hence, the radioactive-decay law (2), in the ”r” base, and wh en expressed in terms of the measured quantities, becomes Nr,sE=Nr,mEexp(−x0 r,E/(1 + 2 βr)1/2cτµ), (8) and it corresponds to the relation (4) in the ”e” base. If we ex press βrin terms of β=v/casβr=β/(1−β) (see [ I]), and use Eq.(8) from [ I] to connect the ”r” and ”e” bases, x0 r,E=x0 E−x1 E=ctE−HE,then the exponential factor in Eq.(8) becomes 6= exp/braceleftBig −(ctE−HE)/[(1 +β)/(1−β)]1/2cτµ/bracerightBig .Using HE=vtEthis exponential factor can be written in the form that resembles to that one in (4), i.e., it is = exp( −tE/ΓrEτµ),and Eq.(8) can be written as Nr,sE=Nr,mEexp(−tE/ΓrEτµ). (9) We see that γ= (1−β)−1/2in (4) (the ”e” base) is replaced by a diﬀerent factor ΓrE= (1 + β)1/2(1−β)−3/2= (1 + β)(1−β)−1γ (10) in (9) (the ”r” base). The observed Γ rEin the experiments [9] must remain the same, = 8.8±0.8,(it is determined from (9) with the measured values of Nr,sE, Nr,mE, tEandτµ), but the predicted Γ rE,using the above relation for Γ rand the known, predicted, γ= 8.4±2, becomes ≃250γ, ΓrE≃250γ. (11) We see that from the common point of view a quite unexpected re sult is obtained in the ”r” coordinatization; the observed Γ rEis as before = 8 .8,while the predicted Γ rEis≃ 250·8.4 = 2100 .Similarly, one can show that there is a great discrepancy bet ween the ﬂuxes measured in [9] and [10] and the ﬂuxes predicted when th e ”dilatation” of time is taken into account but in the ”r” coordinatization. Further more, it can be easily proved that predicted values in the ”r” base and in the muon frame wil l again greatly diﬀer from the measured ones. Such results explicitly show that the ”AT relativity” is not a satisfactory relativistic theory; it predicts, e.g., diﬀerent values of the ﬂux Ns(for the same measured Nm) in diﬀerent synchronizations and for some synchronizatio ns these predicted values are quite diﬀerent than the measured ones. These results are directly contrary to the generally accepted opinion about the validity of the ”AT relativity.” C. The ”TT relativity” approach Let us now examine the experiments [9] and [10] from the point of view of the ”TT relativity.” In the ”TT relativity” all quantities enterin g into physical laws must be 4D tensor quantities, and thus with correct transformation pr operties; the same 4D quantity has to be considered in diﬀerent IFRs and diﬀerent coordinat izations. In the usual, ”AT relativity,” analysis of the ”muon” experiment, for exampl e, the lifetimes τEandτµare considered as the same quantity. Although the transformati on connecting τEandτµ(the dilatation of time, Eq.(3)) is only a part of the Lorentz transformation written in the ”e” base, it is believed by all proponents of the ”AT relativity” thatτEandτµrefer to the same temporal distance (the same quantity) but measured by t he observers in two relatively moving IFRs. However, as shown in the preceding sections and in [I],see Fig.4, in 4D spacetime τEandτµrefer to diﬀerent quantities, which are not connected by the Lorentz transformation. To paraphrase Gamba [6]: ”As far as relativ ity is concerned, quantities likeτEandτµare diﬀerent quantities, not necessarily related to one ano ther. To ask the relation between τEandτµfrom the point of view of relativity, is like asking what is th e relation between the measurement of the radius of the Earth m ade by an observer Sand the 7measurement of the radius of Venus made by an observer S′.We can certainly take the ratio of the two measures; what is wrong is the tacit assumption tha t relativity has something to do with the problem just because the measurements were made b ytwoobservers.” Hence, in the ”TT relativity,” instead of the equation (2), w hich contains x0coordinate, we formulate the radioactive-decay law in terms of covarian tly deﬁned quantities dN/dl =−λN, N =N0exp(−λl). (12) lis the spacetime length (deﬁned by Eq.(2) in [ I]; in the abstract index notation l= (lagablb)1/2,where la(lb) is the distance 4-vector between two events AandB,la=la AB= xa B−xa A,xa A,Bare the position 4-vectors and gabis the metric tensor) for the events of creation of muons (here on the mountain; we denote it as the event O) and their arrival (here at sea level; the event A).λ= 1/l(τ);l(τ) is the spacetime length for the events of creation of muons (here on the mountain; the event O) and their decay after the lifetime τ,the event T.l,deﬁned in such a way, i.e., as a geometrical quantity, is inva riant upon the covariant 4D Lorentz transformations (Eq.(3) in [ I]); La b≡La b(v) =ga b−2uavb c2+(ua+va)(ub+vb) c2−u·v, where uais the proper velocity 4-vector of a frame Swith respect to itself and vais the proper velocity 4-vector of S′relative to S) and, as lis written in the abstract index notation, it does not depend on the chosen coordinatization in the considered IFR. Then in the ”e” base and in the muon frame the distance 4-vector la OAbecomes lα µ,OA= (ctµ,0) (the subscript µwill be used, as previously in this section, to denote the quantitie s in the muon frame, while Greek indices α, βdenote the components of some geometric object, e.g., the co mponents lα µ,OAin the muon frame of the distance 4-vector la OA,see [I] for the notation) and the spacetime length lbetween these events is lOA= (lβ µ,OAlµ,βOA)1/2= (−c2t2 µ)1/2.The representation of the distance 4-vector la OTin the ”e” base and in the muon frame is lα µ,OT= (cτµ,0),whence the spacetime length lOT= (lβ µ,OTlµ,βOT)1/2= (−c2τ2 µ)1/2.Inserting the spacetime lengths lOAandlOTinto the equation (12) we ﬁnd the expression for the radioact ive-decay law in the ”TT relativity” Ns=Nmexp(−lOA/lOT), (13) which in the ”e” base and in the muon frame takes the same form a s the relation (5) (the radioactive-decay law in the ”AT relativity” in the ”e” base and in the muon frame), Ns=Nmexp(−lOA/lOT) =Nmexp(−tµ/τµ). (14) Since the spacetime length lis independent on the chosen IFR and on the chosen coordina- tization the relation (13) holds in the same form in the Earth frame and in the muon frame and in both coordinatizations, the ”e” and ”r” coordinatiza tions. Hence we do not need to examine Eq.(13) in the Earth frame, and in the ”r” base, but we can simply compare the relation (14) with the experiments. Thus, taking into account the discussion given at the begini ng of Sec.4 in [ I], we conclude that, in order to check the validity of the ”TT relativity” in the ”muon” experiment, we 8would need, strictly speaking, to measure, e.g., the lifeti meτµand the time tµin the muon frame, where they determine lOTandlOArespectively, and then to measure the same events (that determined τµandtµin the muon frame) in an IFR that is in uniform motion relative to the muon frame (at us it is the Earth frame). Of course it is n ot possible to do so in the real ”muon” experiment but, nevertheless, in this cas e we can use the data from experiments [9] and [10] and interpret them as that they were obtained in the way required by the ”TT relativity.” The reasons for such a conclusion are the identity of microparticles of the same sort, the assumed homogeneity and isotropy of the spacetime, and some other reasons that are actually discussed in [9] (although from an other point of view). Here we shall not discuss this, in principle, a very complex questio n, than we take the measured values of τµ, tµ, NsandNmand compare them with the results predicted by the relation (14). In [9] τµis taken to be τµ= 2.211µs, N s= 397 ±9, Nm= 550 ±10,buttµis not measured than it is estimated from Fig.6(a) in [9] to be tµ= 0.7µs.Inserting the values of τµ, tµandNmfrom [9] (for this simple comparison we take only the mean val ues without errors) into Eq.(14) we predict that NsisNs= 401 ,which is in an excellent agreement with the measured Ns= 397 .As it is already said, the spacetime length ltakes the same value in both frames and both coordinatizations, le,µ=le,E=lr,µ=lr,E.Hence, for the measured Nm= 550 and if the distance 4-vectors lα OAandlα OTwould be measured in the Earth frame, and in both frames in the ”r” base, we would ﬁnd th e same Ns= 401 .This result undoubtedly conﬁrms the consistency and the validit y of the ”TT relativity.” (Note that we cannot compare the experiments [10] with the ”TT rela tivity” since their tµ,Eq.(7) in [10], is not correctly determined from the ”TT relativity ” viewpoint.) The nonrelativistic theory predicts the same value of the ex ponential factor in both frames, exp(−tE/τE) = exp( −tµ/τµ),since it deals with the absolute time, i.e., with the Galilea n transformations. But, for the measured Nmthe nonrelativistic theory predicts too small Ns. The ”AT relativity” correctly predicts the value of Nsin both frames but only in the ”e” coordinatization, while in the ”r” coordinatization the ex perimental Nsand the theoretically predicted Nsdrastically diﬀer. The ”TT relativity” completely agrees w ith the experiments in all IFRs and all possible coordinatizations. Thus, only the manifestly covariant formulation of the special relativity, i.e., the ”TT relativity,” as the theory of 4D spacetime with the pseudo-Euclidean geometry, is in a complete agreement with the experiments. D. Another time ”dilatation” experiments The same conclusion can be obtained comparing the other part icle lifetime measurements, e.g., [11], or for the pion lifetime [12], with all three theo ries. However, as it is already said, all the mentioned experiments, and not only them but all othe r too, were designed to test the ”AT relativity.” Thus in the experiments [11], which pre ceded to the experiments [9] and [10], the relation similar to (4) is used but with tEreplaced by HE(=vtE) andτE(the lifetime of muons in the Earth frame) replaced by L=vτE(Lis the ”average range before decay”), and also the connection between the lifetimes (3) ( τE=γτµ) is employed. Obviously the predictions of the results in the experiments [11] will depend on the chos en synchronization, since they deal with the ”AT relativity” and use the radioact ive-decay law in the form that contains only a part of the distance 4-vector. The predictions obtained by the use of the ”TT relativity” will be again independent on the chosen IFR and t he chosen coordinatization. 9However the comparison of these experiments [11] with the ”T T relativity” is diﬃcult since, e.g., they have no data for tµ.Similarly happens with the experiments reported in [12]. The lifetime measurements of muons in the g-2 experiments [1 4] are often quoted as the most convincing evidence for the time dilatation, i.e., the y are claimed as high-precision evidence for the special relativity. Namely in the literatu re the evidence for the time dilata- tion is commonly considered as the evidence for the special r elativity. The muon lifetime in ﬂight τis determined by ﬁtting the experimental decay electron tim e distribution to the six-parameter phenomenological function describing the n ormal modulated exponential de- cay spectrum (their Eq.(1)). Then by the use of the relation τ=γτ0and of τ0(ourτµ), the lifetime at rest (as determined by other workers), they obta ined the time-dilatation factor γ,or the kinematical γ.Thisγis compared with the corresponding dynamical γfactor (γ= (p/m)dp/dE ), which they called γ(the average γvalue). γis determined from the mean rotation frequency frotby the use of the Lorentz force law (the ”relativistic” expre s- sion); the magnetic ﬁeld was measured in terms of the proton N MR frequency fp(for the discussion of g−2 experiments within the traditional ”AT relativity” see al so [15]). Limits of order 10−3in (γ−γ)/γat the kinematical γ= 29.3 were set. In that way they also com- pared the value of the µ+lifetime at rest τ+ 0(from the other precise measurements) with the value found in their experiment τ+/γ,and obtained ( τ+ 0−τ+/γ)/τ+ 0= (2±9)×10−4,(this is the same comparison as the mentioned comparison of γwithγ). They claimed: ”At 95% conﬁdence the fractional diﬀerence between τ+ 0andτ+/γis in the range ( −1.6−2.0)×10−3.” and ”To date, this is the most accurate test of relativistic t ime dilation using elementary particles.” The objections to the precision of the experime nts [14], and the remark that a convincing direct test of special relativity must not assum e the validity of special relativity in advance (in the use of the ”relativistic” Lorentz force la w in the determination of the mean rotation frequency and thus of γ,andτ0), have been raised in [16]. The discussion of these objections is given in [17]. However, our objections to [14] are of a quite diﬀerent natur e. Firstly, the theoretical relations refer to the ”e” coordinatization and, e.g., Eq.( 1) in the ﬁrst paper in [14] cannot be transformed in an appropriate way to the ”r” coordinatizati on in order to compare the ”AT relativity” in diﬀerent coordinatizations with the experi ments. If only the exponential factor is considered then this factor is again, as in [9], aﬀected by synchrony choice. Although the time tin that exponential factor may be independent of the chosen s ynchronization (when tis taken to be the multiple of the mean rotation period T), but τdoes not refer to the events that happen at the same spatial point and thus it is synchrony dependent quantity. This means that in the ”r” base one cannot use the re lation τ=γτ0to ﬁnd the ”dilatation” factor γ,but the relation (21) from [ I] for the time ”dilatation” in the ”r” base, x0 r(τ) = (1 + 2 βr)1/2cτ0must be employed. Hence, the whole comparison of γwithγholds only in the ”e” base; in another coordinatization the ”AT rel ativity” predicts quite diﬀerent τ0for the same x0(τ),which is inferred from the exponential decay spectrum. Let us now examine the measurements [14] from the point of vie w of the ”TT relativity.” But for the ”TT relativity” these experiments are incomplet e and cannot be compared with the theory. Namely, in the ”TT relativity,” as already said, it is not possible to ﬁnd the values of the muon lifetime in ﬂight τby analyses of the measurements of the radioactive decay distribution, since, there, the radioactive decay la w is written in terms of the spacetime lengths and not with tandτ.Also, in the ”TT relativity,” there is not the connection bet ween 10the muon lifetime in ﬂight τand the lifetime at rest τ0in the form τ=γτ0,sinceτ,in the ”TT relativity,” does not exist as a well deﬁned quantity. Th us, in the ”TT relativity,” there is no sense in the use of the relation τ=γτ0to determine γ.An important remark is in place here; in principle, in the ”TT relativity,” the same ev ents and the same quantities have to be considered in diﬀerent frames of reference, which mean s that in the muon experiment [14] the lifetime at rest τ0refers to the decaying particle in an accelerated frame and f or the theoretical discussion we would need to use the coordina te transformations connecting an IFR with an accelerated frame of reference. (An example of the generalized Lorentz transformation is given in [18] but they are written in the ”e ” base and thus not in fully covariant way, i.e., not in the way as we have written the cova riant Lorentz transformation, Eq.(3) in [ I].) Furthermore, in the experiments [14] the average value o fγ(γ), i.e., the dynamical γ,for the circulating muons is found by analysis of the bunch st ructure of the stored muon and the use of the relation connecting γand the mean rotation frequency frot; this relation is obtained by the use of the expression for th e ”relativistic,” i.e., the ”AT relativity,” Lorentz force law, which is expressed by me ans of the 3-vectors EandB. However, in contrast to the ”AT relativity,” and also to the u sual covariant formulation, in the ”TT relativity,” the covariant Lorentz force Ka= (q/c)Fabub(Fabis the electromagnetic ﬁeld tensor and ubis the 4-velocity of a charge q; all is written in the abstract index notation, [19] and [20]) cannot be expressed in terms of the 3-vectors EandB.Namely, as already said, in the ”AT relativity” the real physical meaning is att ributed not to Fabthan to the 3-vectors EandB,while in the ”TT relativity” only covariantly deﬁned quanti ties do have well-deﬁned physical meaning both in the theory and in exper iments. (The transformations of the 3-vectors EandBare not directly connected with the Lorentz transformation s of thewhole 4D tensor quantity Fabas a geometrical quantity ,but indirectly through the transformations of some components ofFab,and that, in the speciﬁc coordinatization, the Einstein coordinatization. This issue is discussed in [1] and [4,21], where it is also sho wn that the 3-vector E(B) in an IFR Sand the transformed 3-vector E′(B′) in relatively moving IFR S′do not refer to the same physical quantity in 4D spacetime, i. e., that the conventional transformations of EandBare the AT.) From [20] and [4] one can see how the Lorentz force Kais expressed in terms of the 4-vectors EaandBaand show when this form corresponds to the classical expression for the Lorentz for ce with the 3-vectors EandB.Also it can be seen from [4] that for Bα/negationslash= 0 (Bαis the representation of Bain the ”e” base) it is not possible to obtain γu= 1 (the 4-velocity of a charge qin the ”e” base is uα= (γuc, γuu) andγu= (1−u2/c2)−1/2) and the covariant Lorentz force Kacan never take the form of the usual magnetic force FB.Hence it follows that in the ”TT relativity” it is not possibl e to use the Lorentz force FBand the usual equation of motion d(γmu)/dt=q(u×B) to ﬁnd the relation connecting γand the mean rotation frequency frot,and thus to ﬁnd τ0fromτ/γ, .in the way as in [14]. The discussion about the kinematical γ(the relation τ=γτ0) and about the dynamical γ(from the use of the Lorentz force) shows that the measuremen ts [14] cannot be compared with the ”TT relativity.” But, as we explained be fore, in contrast to the usual opinion, these experiments do not conﬁrm the ”AT relativity ” either, since if the exponential decay spectrum is analyzed in another coordinatization, e. g., the ”r” coordinatization, then, similarly as for the experiments [9], one ﬁnds that for the gi venN0the theoretical and the experimental Ndiﬀer. 11IV. THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT These conclusions will be further supported considering so me other experiments, which, customarily, were assumed to conﬁrm the ”AT relativity.” Th e ﬁrst one will be the famous Michelson-Morley experiment [22], and some modern version s of this experiment will be also discussed. In the Michelson-Morley experiment two light beams emitted by one source are sent, by half-silvered mirror O, in orthogonal directions. These partial beams of light tra verse the two equal (of the length L) and perpendicular arms OM1(perpendicular to the motion) andOM2(in the line of motion) of Michelson’s inteferometer and the behaviour of the interference fringes produced on bringing together these t wo beams after reﬂection on the mirrors M1andM2is examined. In order to avoid the inﬂuence of the eﬀect that t he two lengths of arms are not exactly equal the entire inteferomet er is rotated through 900.Then any small diﬀerence in length becomes unimportant. The expe riment consists of looking for a shift of the intereference fringes as the apparatus is rota ted. The expected maximum shift in the number of fringes (the measured quantity) on a 900rotation is △N=△(φ2−φ1)/2π, (15) where △(φ2−φ1) is the change in the phase diﬀerence when the interferomete r is rotated through 900. φ1andφ2are the phases of waves moving along the paths OM1OandOM2O, respectively. A. The nonrelativistic approach In the nonrelativistic approach the speed of light in the pre ferred frame is c.Then, on the ether hypothesis, the speed of light, in the Earth frame, i.e., in the rest frame of the interferometer (the Sframe), on the path along an arm of the Michelson interferome ter oriented perpendicular to its motion at velocity vrelative to the preferred frame (the ether) is (c2−v2)1/2; the Earth together with the inteferometer moving with velo cityvthrough the ether is equivalent to the inteferometer at rest with the ether streaming through it with velocity −v.Since in Sboth waves are brought together to the same spatial point the phase diﬀerence φ2−φ1is determined only by the time diﬀerence t2−t1;φ2−φ1= 2π(t2−t1)/T, where t1andt2are the times required for the complete trips OM1OandOM2O,respectively, andT(=λ/c) is the period of vibration of the light. From the known speed of light one ﬁnds thatt1is t1= 2L/c(1−v2/c2)1/2. (16) Similarly, the speed of light on the path OM2isc−v,and on the return path is c+v,giving that t2= 2L/c(1−v2/c2). (17) We see that according to the nonrelativistic approach the ti met1is a little less than the time t2,even though the mirrors M1andM2are equidistant from O.To order v2/c2the diﬀerence 12in the times is t2−t1= (L/c)(v2/c2).Inserting it into △N(15) (the measured quantity △N, when the phase diﬀerence is determined by the time diﬀerence , is△N= 2(t2−t1)c/λ) we ﬁnd, to the same order v2/c2, that △N≃(2L/λ)(v2/c2). (18) This result is obtained by the classical analysis in the Eart h frame (the interferometer rest frame). Let us now consider the same experiment in the preferred fram e (the S′frame).Since in the nonrelativistic theory the two frames are connected by t he Galilean transformations, it follows that the corresponding times in both frames are equa l,t1=t′ 1andt2=t′ 2,whence t2−t1=t′ 2−t′ 1and, supposing that again the phase diﬀerence is determined only by the time diﬀerence, △N=△N′.However, for the further purposes, it is worth to ﬁnd explici tly t′ 1andt′ 2considering the experiment directly in the preferred frame . Since the speed of light in the preferred frame is c,the preferred-frame observer considers that the light trav els a distance ct′ 1/2 along the hypotenuse of a triangle; in the same time t′ 1/2 the mirror M1 moves to M′ 1, i.e., to the right a distance vt′ 1/2,and from the right triangle this observer ﬁndst′ 1/2 =L/c(1−v2/c2)1/2.The return trip is again along the hypotenuse of a triangle and the return time is again = t′ 1/2.The total time for such a zigzag path is, as it must be, t′ 1=t1(16) (the half-silvered mirror Omoved to O′int′ 1). For the arm oriented parallel to its motion the preferred-frame observer considers that the light, when going from OtoM′ 2, must traverse a distance L+vt′ 3at the speed c,whence L+vt′ 3=ct′ 3andt′ 3=L/(c−v). In a like manner, the time t′ 4for the return trip is t′ 4=L/(c+v).The total time t′ 2=t′ 3+t′ 4 is, as it must be, equal to t2(17) (the half-silvered mirror Omoved to O′′int′ 2). This discussion shows that the nonrelativistic theory is a consi stent theory giving the same △N in both frames. However it does not agree with the experiment . Namely Michelson and Morley found from their experiment that was no observable fr inge shift. From the theoretical point of view it is interesting to menti on an analysis of the Michelson-Morley experiment which is given in [23]. There, the paths of light are exam- ined in the case when the experiment is viewed from a frame in w hich the apparatus is moving at velocity v(ourS′frame). It is inquired whether the half-silvered mirror Ocor- rectly reﬂects the light to and from the interferometer arms , such that light travels in the appropriate ”triangular path” in the transverse arm, and co rrectly brings the longitudinal ray into line with the transverse ray at the detector. The res ult is that if in the classical analysis the half-silvered mirror is set to exactly 450,then the transverse ray will ”over- shoot” the desired trajectory while the longitudinal ray wi ll ”undershoot.” The interference pattern will be dependent on the position of the detector sin ce there is a divergence of the interfering light rays. The ray angles on the way to the detec tor are given by Eq.(16) in [23] The diﬀerence in these angles is exceedingly small (sec ond order in v/c), and hence negligible in the usual Michelson-Morley experiment. At this point it has to be noted that there are more serious obj ections to the traditional derivation of △Nin the nonrelativistic theory and in S′than the one mentioned by [23]. These objections are usually overlooked and we only brieﬂy s ketch them here. Firstly, in S′ the waves are not brought together to the same spatial point a nd consequently the phase diﬀerence is not determined only by the time diﬀerence. Stri ctly speaking the increment of phase φ′ 1for the trip OM′ 1O′isφ′ 1= (ω′ OM′ 1t′ 1/2−k′ OM′ 1l′ OM′ 1) + (ω′ M′ 1O′t′ 1/2−k′ M′ 1O′l′ M′ 1O′), 13and similarly the increment of phase φ′ 2for the trip OM′ 2O′′isφ′ 2= (ω′ OM′ 2t′ 3−k′ OM′ 2l′ OM′ 2)+ (ω′ M′ 2O′′t′ 4−k′ M′ 2O′′l′ M′ 2O′′),where ω′ OM′ 1,k′ OM′ 1,andl′ OM′ 1are the angular frequency, the wave 3-vector and the distance 3-vector (− − − →OM′ 1), respectively, of the wave on the trip OM′ 1,etc.. What is overlooked in the usual derivation of △Nin the nonrelativistic theory is that not allω′are the same due to the classical Doppler eﬀect of inertial mo tion of a source and of a mirror in the S′frame, and that the classical aberration of light has to be ta ken into account when diﬀerent k′inS′are determined (this is, in fact, considered in [23]). We sha ll not examine the mentioned changes of the classical derivation s ince△N,obtained with these changes, will be again diﬀerent from zero. It is possible to look at the Michelson-Morley experiment fr om another point of view; the light ray going both ways in one of the arms of the interfer ometer can be considered as a clock, a light clock, with the period determined by the retu rn time of the light ray. The experiment is then considered as the comparison of the frequ encies of two clocks, and it shows that the relative frequency does not change by a rotation of t he interferometer. Such point of view is important for the interpretation of the modern ver sions of the Michelson-Morley experiment. B. The ”AT relativity” approach Next we examine the same experiment from the ”AT relativity” viewpoint. Again, as in the discussion of the ”muon” experiment, we consider this ex periment in both frames and in both coordinatizations as well. First the ”e” coordinatiza tion in both frames will be explored. It has to be noted that the experiment is usually discussed on ly in the ”e” base, and again, as in the nonrelativistic theory, the phase diﬀerence φ2−φ1is considered to be determined only by the time diﬀerence t2−t1.Further, in contrast to the nonrelativistic theory, in the ”AT relativity” and in the ”e” base it is postulated (Einstei n’s second postulate) that light always travels with speed c. Hence in the Sframe (the rest frame of the interferometer) t1= 2L/candt2= 2L/c, and, with the assumption that only the time diﬀerence t2−t1matters, it follows that △N=0,in agreement with the experiment. In the S′frame (the preferred frame) the time t′ 1is determined in the same way as in the nonrelativistic theor y, i.e., supposing that a zigzag path is taken by the light beam in a moving ”light clock ”. Thus, the light-travel timet′ 1is exactly equal to that one in the nonrelativistic theory, t′ 1= 2L/c(1−v2/c2)1/2. Comparing with t1= 2L/cwe see that, in contrast to the nonrelativistic theory, it ta kes a longer time for light to go from end to end in the moving clock than in the stationary clock, t′ 1=t1/(1−v2/c2)1/2=γt1,see, e.g., [7] p.15-6, [8] p.359, or an often cited paper on modern tests of special relativity [13]. This is the usual wa y in which it is shown how, in the ”AT relativity,” the time dilatation is forced upon us by the constancy of the speed of light. However, in the ”AT relativity,” the light-travel ti met′ 2is determined by invoking the Lorentz contraction; it is argued that a preferred frame obs erver measures the length of the arm oriented parallel to its motion to be contracted to a leng thL′=L(1−v2/c2)1/2,see, e.g., [13] .Then t′ 2is determined in the same way as in the nonrelativistic theor y but with L′ replacing the rest length L, t′ 2= (L′/(c−v))+(L′/(c+v)) = 2 L/c(1−v2/c2)1/2=t′ 1,whence t′ 2−t′ 1= 0 and △N′=0,as in the Sframe. We quoted such usual derivation in order to 14illustrate how the time dilatation and the Lorentz contract ion are used in the ”AT relativity” to show the agreement between the theory and the famous Miche lson-Morley experiment. Although this procedure is generally accepted by the majori ty of physicists as the correct one and quoted in all textbooks on the subject, we note that su ch an explanation of the null result of the experiment is very awkward and does not use at all the 4D symmetry of the spacetime; the derivation deals with the temporal and sp atial distances as well deﬁned quantities, i.e., in a similar way as in the prerelativistic physics, and then in an artiﬁcial way introduces the changes in these distances due to the moti on. To better illustrate the preceding assertions we derive the same results for t′ 1, t′ 2and△N′ in another way too. It starts with 4D quantities, but then, as shown in [ I] Sec.4.2, connects only some parts of the distance 4-vectors, i.e., the tempora l distances, in two relatively moving frames using Eq.(20) from [ I] for the time dilatation in the ”e” base instead of the complete Lorentz transformation. Let now A, B andA1denote the events; the departure of the transverse ray from the half-silvered mirror O,the reﬂection of this ray on the mirror M1and the arrival of this beam of light after the round trip on th e half-silvered mirror O,respectively. In the same way we have, for the longitudinal a rm of the inteferometer, the corresponding events A, C andA2.Then, from Eq.(20) in [ I], one ﬁnds t′ 1=γt1, t′ 2=γt2=t′ 1and consequently △N′=0.But, note, that in both mentioned derivations in the ”AT relativity,” the fequencies of the waves are suppo sed to be the same in Sand S′,i.e., the Doppler eﬀect is not taken into account, and the con tributions of k′andl′ to the increments of phase in S′are neglected, i.e., the consideration of the aberration of light in the determination of diﬀerent k′inS′is not performed. Obviously, in the ”AT relativity,” the same procedure is applied to the calculati on of φ′ 1, φ′ 2and△N′inS′as in the nonrelativistic theory; only, in an artiﬁcial way, the L orentz contraction and the time dilatation are introduced into the calculation. The same experiment can be examined in the ”r” coordinatizat ion.This synchronization is an asymmetric synchronization, which leads to an asymmet ry in the measured one-way speed of light, but the average speed of light on any round tri p is independent of the synchronization procedure employed, and is = c.In the Michelson-Morley experiment the measured phase diﬀerence between the phases on the round tri psOM1OandOM2OinS, the rest frame of the interferometer, is synchrony independ ent, since both waves are brought together to the same spatial point. Hence, one concludes tha t the same result △N=0 will be obtained in the Sframe in the ”r” base as in the ”e” coordinatization. However in the S′frame such independence on the used coordinatization canno t be expected. We shall not discuss this issue here for the sake of saving space, and sinc e there are some more important problems in the traditional ”AT relativity” derivation of △N. As already mentioned, it is shown in [23] that the classical a nalysis of the interference, in the frame in which the apparatus is in motion, predicts a di vergence of the interfering light rays on the way to the detector. In contrast to this resu lt, the exact parallelness of the longitudinal and the transverse rays is obtained in [23], bu t only in the case when, in addition to the usual analysis in the ”AT relativity,” the Lorentz con traction ”tilt” of the moving half-silvered mirror is taken into account. The analysis in [23] actually takes into account the aberration of light, which is overlooked in the traditional derivation in the ”AT relativity” in the same way as it is overlooked in the nonrelativistic the ory. However this analysis is performed in the ”e” coordinatization and the Lorentz con traction ”tilt” of the moving 15half-silvered mirror, that is required for the exact parall elness of the rays, is considered in that coordinatization. In another coordinatization, e.g. , in the ”r” coordinatization, the Lorentz ”contraction” of the moving half-silvered mirror w ill be diﬀerent, it can become a ”dilatation,” and one can expect a divergence of the interfe ring light rays on the way to the detector. But, as it is already said, the eﬀect is exceedingl y small (second order in v/c), and hence negligible in the usual Michelson-Morley experim ent, and therefore it will not be discussed in more detail. 1. Driscoll’s non-null fringe shift In [24] the usual ”AT relativity” calculation in the ”e” base (see the discussion above and also [7], [8], [13]) of the fring shift in the Michelson-M orley experiment is repeated, and, of course, the observed null fringe shift independent of cha nges of v, the relative velocity of SandS′,and/or θ,the angle that the undivided ray from the source to the beam di vider makes with v,is obtained. However, it is noticed in [24] that in such a trad itional calculation of△(φ2−φ1) (the change in the phase diﬀerence when the interferometer is rotated through 900) only path lengths (optical or geometrical), i.e., the temp oral distances, are considered, while the Doppler eﬀect on wavelength in the S′frame, in which the interferometer is moving, is not taken into account. Then the same calculation of △(φ′ 2−φ′ 1),as the traditional one, is performed in [24], but determing the increment of phase al ong some path, e.g. OM′ 1, not only by the segment of geometric path length (i.e., the tempo ral distance for that path) than also by the wavelength in that segment (i.e., the frequency o f the wave in that segment). Accordingly the phase diﬀerence (in our notation) φ′ 1−φ′ 2,in the S′frame, between the ray along the vertical path OM′ 1O′,and that one along the longitudinal path OM′ 2O′′, respectively, is found (see [24]) to be (φ′ 1−φ′ 2)(b)/2π= 2(Lν/c)(1 +ε+β2)−2(Lν/c)(1 + 2 β2) = 2( Lν/c)(ε−β2),(19) Eqs.(23-25) in [24], where Lis the length of the segment OM2andL=L(1 +ε) is the length of the arm OM1(L,Landνare determined in the rest frame of the interferometer). In this expression the Doppler eﬀect of von the frequencies, and the Lorentz contraction of the longitudinal arm, are taken into account. In a like man ner Driscoll ﬁnds the phase diﬀerence in the case when the interferometer is rotated thr ough 900 (φ′ 1−φ′ 2)(a)/2π= 2(Lν/c)(1 +ε+ 2β2)−2(Lν/c)(1 +β2) = 2( Lν/c)(ε+β2),(20) Eqs.(19-21) in [24]. Hence, it is found in [24] a ”surprising ” non-null fringe shift △N′=△(φ′ 2−φ′ 1)/2π= 4(Lν/c)β2, (21) where △(φ′ 2−φ′ 1) = (φ′ 1−φ′ 2)(b)−(φ′ 1−φ′ 2)(a),and we see that the entire fringe shift is due to the Doppler shift. From the non-null result (21) the au thor of [24] concluded: ”that the Maxwell-Einstein electromagnetic equations and speci al relativity jointly are disproved, not conﬁrmed, by the Michelson-Morley experiment.” Howeve r such a conclusion cannot be drawn from the result (21). The origin of the appearance of △N′/negationslash= 0 (21) is quite diﬀerent than that considered in [24], and it will be explained below. Note that in [23] the changes 16in the usual derivation of △N′,which are caused by the aberration of light, are considered, while [24] investigates those changes which are caused by th e Doppler eﬀect. Both changes are examined only in the ”e” base, and both would be diﬀerent i n, e.g., the ”r” base. This means that △N′inS′will be dependent on the chosen synchronization, and conseq uently that the ”AT relativity” is not capable to explain in a satisf actory manner the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. C. The ”TT relativity” approach Next we examine the Michelson-Morley experiment from the ”T T relativity” viewpoint. Then the relevant quantity is the phase of a light wave, and it is (when written in the abstract index notation, see [ I] and [19]) φ=kagablb, (22) where kais the propagation 4-vector, gabis the metric tensor and lbis the distance 4-vector. (We note that in the ”TT relativity” the light waves are descr ibed by the 4-vectors Ea(xb) andBa(xb) of the electric and magnetic ﬁelds ( Ea(xb) =Ea 0exp(ikbxb)),while the ”AT relativity” works with the 3-vectors E(r,t) andB(r,t) (E(r,t) =E0exp(i(kr−ωt))),as in the prerelativistic physics.) The traditional derivation of△N(in the ”AT relativity”) deals only with the calculation of t1andt2inSandS′,but does not take into account either the changes in frequencies due to the Doppler eﬀect or the abe rration of light. The ”AT relativity” calculations in [24] and [23] improve the tradi tional procedure taking into account the changes in frequencies [24], and the aberration of light [23], but only in the ”e” base. None of the ”AT relativity” calculations deals with the cova riantly deﬁned 4D quantities, in this case, the covariantly deﬁned phase (22), and it will b e shown here that the non- null theoretical result obtained in [24] is a consequence of that fact. In the ”TT relativity” neither the Doppler eﬀect nor the aberration of light exist s eparately as well deﬁned physical phenomena. The separate contributions to φof the ωtfactors and klfactors are, in general case, meaningless in the ”TT relativity” and only their indi visible unity, the phase (22), is meaningful quantity; it is invariant upon the covariant 4D L orentz transformations (Eq.(3) in [I] and Sec.3 here) ,and, as it is written in the abstract index notation, the phas e (22) does not depend on the chosen coordinatization in the consid ered IFR. (All quantities in (22), i.e., ka,gabandlb,are the 4D tensor quantities that correctly transform upon t he covariant 4D Lorentz transformations (Eq.(3) in [ I] and Sec.3 here) ,which means that in all relatively moving IFRs always the same 4D quantity , e.g., ka,orlb,is considered. This is not the case in the ”AT relativity” where, for example, the relation t′ 1=γt1is not the Lorentz transformation of some 4D quantity, and t′ 1andt1do not correspond to the same 4D quantity considered in S′andSrespectively.) Only in the ”e” coordinatization the ωt andklfactors can be considered separately. Therefore, and in ord er to retain the similarity with the prerelativistic and the ”AT relativity” considera tions, we ﬁrst determine φ(22) in the ”e” base and in the Sframe (the rest frame of the interferometer). Then kµ ABeand lµ ABe(the representations of ka ABandla ABin the ”e” base and in S) for the wave on the tripOM1(AandBare the corresponding events for that trip, as mentioned pre viously) kµ ABe= (ω/c,0,2π/λ,0) and lµ ABe= (ctM1,0,L,0),while for the wave on the return trip M1O, 17(the events BandA1)kµ BA1e= (ω/c,0,−2π/λ,0) and lµ BA1e= (ctM1,0,−L,0)). Hence the increment of phase φ1e, for the the round trip OM1O,is φ1e=kµ ABelµABe+kµ BA1elµBA1e= 2(−ωtM1+ (2π/λ)L), where ωis the angular frequency and, for the sake of comparison with [24], the length of the arm OM1is taken to be L=L(1 +ε),andLis the length of the segment OM2.In a like manner we ﬁnd kµ ACeandlµ ACefor the wave on the trip OM2,(the corresponding events for the round trip OM2OareA, C andA2) askµ ACe= (ω/c,2π/λ,0,0) and lµ ACe= (ctM2, L,0,0),while for the wave on the return trip M2O, kµ CA2e= (ω/c,−2π/λ,0,0) and lµ CA2e= (ctM2,−L,0,0)), whence φ2e=kµ ACelµACe+kµ CA2elµCA2e= 2(−ωtM2+ (2π/λ)L), and thus φ1e−φ2e=−2ω(tM1−tM2) + 2(2 π/λ)(L−L). (23) Particularly for L=L,and consequently tM1=tM2,one ﬁnds φ1e−φ2e= 0.It can be easily shown that the same diﬀerence of phase (23) is obtai ned in the case when the interferometer is rotated through 900,whence we ﬁnd that △(φ1e−φ2e)=0,and△Ne= 0. Since, according to the construction, φ(22) is a Lorentz scalar, and does not depend on the chosen coordinatization in a considered IFR, we immediatel y conclude, without calculation, that △N′ e=△Nr=△N′ r=△Ne= 0, (24) which is in a complete agreement with the Michelson-Morley e xperiment. 1. Explanation of Driscoll’s non-null fringe shift and of th e null fringe shift obtained in the conventional ”AT relativity” calculation Driscoll’s improvement of the traditional ”AT relativity” derivation of the fringe shift can be easily obtained from our covariant approach taking on ly the product k′0 el′ 0ein the calculation of the increment of phase φ′ einS′in which the apparatus is moving. Thus in S′k′µ ABe= (γω/c,−βγω/c, 2π/λ,0) and l′µ ABe= (γctM1,−βγct M1,L,0),and also k′µ BA1e= (γω/c,−βγω/c, −2π/λ,0) and l′µ BA1e= (γctM1,−βγct M1,−L,0),giving that (−1/2π)(k′0 ABel′ 0ABe+k′0 BA1el′ 0BA1e) = 2γ2νtM1≃2(Lν/c)(1 +ε+β2), (25) which is exactly equal to Driscoll’s result △PHb,for our notation see (19). In a like manner one ﬁnds that (−1/2π)(k′0 ACel′ 0ACe+k′0 CA2el′ 0CA2e) = 2γ2(νtM2+β2L/λ)≃2(Lν/c)(1 + 2 β2), (26) which is Driscoll’s result △PΞb,see (19). In the same way we can ﬁnd in S′Driscoll’s result (20) and ﬁnally the non-null fringe shift, Eq.(21). T he same calculation of k′i el′ ie,the contribution of the spatial parts of k′µ eandl′ µeto△N′ e,shows that this term exactly cancel 18thek′0 el′ 0econtribution (Driscoll’s non-null fringe shift (21)), yie lding that △N′ e= 0.We note that the calculation in [24] actually assumes that k0 el0eandk′0 el′ 0erefer to the same quantity measured by the observers in SandS′; of course, it is supposed that SandS′are connected by the Lorentz transformation, and consequently that the quantities k0 el0eand k′0 el′ 0eare connected by the Lorentz transformation as well. Howeve r the relations (25) and (26) are not the Lorentz transformation of some 4D quantity, and really k0 el0eandk′0 el′ 0edo not refer to the same 4D quantity considered in SandS′respectively. Thus in this case too the quantities k0 el0eandk′0 el′ 0eare connected by the AT, and, as Gamba [6] says, whenever two quantities, which are connected by the AT, are considere d to refer to the same physical quantity in 4D spacetime we have the case of mistaken identity. The traditional ”AT relativity” analysis of the experiment deals only with the calculation oft1andt2inSandS′,(t1inSis = 2tM1andctM1is only zeroth component l0 ABe(=ctM1) of lµ ABe,and similarly for t2andctM2). Furthermore, such traditional ”AT relativity” calculat ion simply connects, e.g., zeroth component l0 ABeinSandl′0 ABeinS′, orl0 ACeandl′0 ACe,etc., by the relation for the time ”dilatation” in the ”e” base, l′0 ABe=γctM1, and also l′0 ACe=γctM2, although l′0 ACe,when determined by the Lorentz transformation, is l′0 ACe=γ(ctM2−βL), which then yields that t′ 1=γt1, t′ 2=γt2=t′ 1,and consequently one ﬁnds the null fringe shift△N′=0.It is clear from this discussion that, in contrast to the usua l opinion, the quantities, e.g., t′ 1andt1,etc., do not refer to the same quantity, which is measured in relatively moving IFRs S′andS,but they are diﬀerent 4D quantities that are not connected by the Lorentz transformation. Therefore the agreement of h e traditional ”AT relativity” calculation with the results of the Michelson-Morley exper iment is not the ”true” agreement, but an ”apparent” agreement that is achieved by an incorrect procedure. The whole discussion about the the Michelson-Morley experi ment reveals that, contrary to the generaly accepted opinion, the Michelson-Morley exper iment does not conﬁrm the validity of the traditional Einstein approach to the special relativ ity, i.e., the ”AT relativity,” than it conﬁrms the validity of a compete covariant approach, both i n the theory and experiments, i.e., it conﬁrms the ”TT relavitity.” D. The modern laser versions The modern laser versions of the Michelson-Morley experime nt, e.g., [25] and [26], are always interpreted according to the ”AT relativity.” They r ely on highly monochromatic (maser) laser frequency metrology rather than optical inte rferometry; the measured quantity is not the maximum shift in the number of fringes than a beat fr equency variation and the associated (maser) laser-frequency shift. In [25] the auth ors recorded the variations in beat frequency between two optical maser oscillators when rotat ed through 900in space; the two maser cavities are placed orthogonally on a rotating table a nd they can be considered as two light clocks. It is stated in [25] that the highly monochr omatic frequencies of masers; ”...allow very sensitive detection of any change in the roun d-trip optical distance between two reﬂecting surfaces.” and that the comparison of the frequen cies of two masers allows: ”...a very precise examination of the isotropy of space with respe ct to light propagation.” The result of this experiment was: ”... there was no relative var iation in the maser frequencies associated with orientation of the earth in space greater th an about 3 kc/sec.” Similarly [26] compares the frequencies of a He-Ne laser locked to the r esonant frequency of a higly 19stable Fabry-Perot cavity (the meter-stick, i.e., ”etalon of length”) and of a CH4stabilized ”telescope-laser” frequency reference system. The beat fr equency of the isolation laser ( CH4 stabilized-laser) with the cavity-stabilized laser was th e measured quantity; a beat frequency variation is considered when the direction of the cavity len gth is rotated. The authors of [26], in the same way as [25], consider their experiment as: ” isotropy of space experiment.” Namely it is stated in [26] that: ”Rotation of the entire elec tro-optical system maps any cosmic directional anisotropy of space into a correspondin g frequency variation.” They found a null result, i.e., a fractional length change of △l/l= (1.5±2.5)×10−15(this is also the fractional frequency shift) in showing the isotrop y of space; this result represented a 4000-fold improvement on the measurements [25]. In [13] th e experiment [26] is quoted as the most precise repetition of the Michelson-Morley expe riment, and it is asserted that the experiment [26] constrained the two times, our t′ 1andt′ 2, to be equal within a fractional error of 10−15. The times t′ 1andt′ 2refer to the round-trips in two maser cavities in [25], and to the round-trips in the Fabry-Perot cavity in [26]. These t imes are calculated in the same way as in the Michelson-Morley experiment.(see, for exampl e, [13]). The above brief discussion of the experiments [25] and [26], and the previous analysis of the usual, ”AT relativity,” calculation of t′ 1andt′ 2in the Michelson-Morley experiment, suggest that the same remarks as in the Michelson-Morley exp eriment hold also for the experiments [25] and [26]. For example, the reﬂections of li ght in maser cavities or in Fabry- Perot cavity happen on the moving mirrors as in the Michelson -Morley experiment, which means that the optical paths between the reﬂecting ends have to be calculated taking into account the Doppler eﬀect, i.e., as in Driscoll’s procedure [24]. In fact, the interference of the light waves, e.g., the light waves with close frequenc ies from two maser cavities in [25], is always determined by their phase diﬀerence and not o nly with their frequencies. Hence, although the measurement of the beat frequency varia tion is more precise than the measurement of the shift in the number of fringes, it cannot c heck the validity of the ”AT relativity” in the same measure as it can the latter one. Also it has to be noted that the theoretical predictions for the beat frequency variation a re strongly dependent on the chosen synchronization. Altogether, contrary to the generally ac cepted opinion, the experiments [25] and [26] do not conﬁrm the validity of the ”AT relativity .” Regarding the ”TT relativity,” the modern laser versions [2 5] and [26] of the Michelson- Morley experiment are incomplete experiments (only the bea t frequency variation is mea- sured) and cannot be compared with the theory; in the ”TT rela tivity” the same 4D quantity has to be considered in relatively moving IFRs and the frequency, taken alone, is not a 4D quantity . V. THE KENNEDY-THORNDIKE TYPE EXPERIMENTS In the Kennedy-Thorndike experiment [27] a Michelson inter ferometer with unequal arm- lengths was employed and they looked for possible diurnal an d annual variations in the diﬀerence of the optical paths due to the motion of the interf erometer with respect to the preferred frame. The measured quantity was, as in the Michel son-Morley experiment, the shift in the number of fringes, and in [27] the authors also fo und that was no observable fringe shift. We shall not discuss this experiment since the whole consideration is completely the same as in the case of the Michelson-Morley experiment, a nd, consequently, the same 20conclusion holds also here, i.e., the experiment [27] does n ot agree with the ”AT relativity,” but directly proves the ”TT relativity.” A modern version of the Kennedy-Thorndike exper- iment was carried out in [28], and the authors stated: ”We hav e performed the physically equivalent measurement (with the Kennedy-Thorndike exper iment, my remark) by search- ing for a sidereal 24-h variation in the frequency of a stabil ized laser compared with the frequency of a laser locked to a stable cavity.” The result wa s: ”No variations were found at the level of 2 ×10−13.” Also they declared: ”This represents a 300-fold improveme nt over the original Kennedy-Thorndike experiment and allows the Lorentz transformations to be deduced entirely from experiment at an accuracy level of 7 0 ppm.” (my emphasis) The experiment [28] is of the same type as the experiment [26], an d neither the experiment [26] is physically equivalent to the Michelson-Morley experime nt, as shown above, nor, contrary to the opinion of the authors of [28], the experiment [28] is p hysically equivalent to the Kennedy-Thorndike experiment; the measurement of the beat frequency variation is not equivalent to the measurement of the change in the phase diﬀe rence (in terms of the mea- surement of the shift in the number of fringes). And, additio nally, the Michelson-Morley and the Kennedy-Thorndike experiments can be compared both wit h the ”AT relativity” and the ”TT relativity”, while the modern laser versions [26], [25] and [28] of these experiments are incomplete experiments from the ”TT relativity” viewpoint and cannot be compared with the ”TT relativity.” Furthermore, the ”TT relativity” deal s with the covariant 4D Lorentz transformations (Eq.(3) in [ I] and in Sec.3.3 here) and they cannot be deduced from the experiment [28]. VI. THE IVES-STILLWEL TYPE EXPERIMENTS Ives and Stilwell [29] performed a precision Doppler eﬀect e xperiment in which they used a beam of excited hydrogen molecules as a moving light source . The frequencies of the light emitted parallel and antiparallel to the beam direction wer e measured by a spectograph (at rest in the laboratory). The measured quantity in this exper iment is △f/f0= (△fb− △fr)/f0, (27) where f0is the frequency of the light emitted from resting atoms. △fb=\|fb−f0\|and △fr=\|fr−f0\|,where fbis the blue-Doppler-shifted frequency that is emitted in a d irection parallel to v(vis the velocity of the atoms relative to the laboratory), and fris the red- Doppler-shifted frequency that is emitted in a direction op posite to v.The quantity △f/ f0measures the extent to which the frequency of the light from r esting atoms fails to lie halfway between the frequencies frandfb.In terms of wavelengths the relation (27) can be written as △λ/λ0= (△λr− △λb)/λ0, (28) where △λr=\|λr−λ0\|and△λb=\|λb−λ0\|,and, as we said, λrandλbare the wavelengths shifted due to the Doppler eﬀect to the ”red” and ”blue” regio ns of the spectrum. In that way Ives and Stilwell replaced the diﬃcult problem of the pre cise determination of the wavelength with much simpler problem of the determination o f the asymmetry of shifts of the ”red” and ”blue” shifted lines with respect to the unshif ted line. They [29] showed 21that the measured results agree with the formula predicted b y the traditional formulation of the special relativity, i.e., the ”AT relativity,” and no t with the classical nonrelativistic expression for the Doppler eﬀect. Let us explain it in more de tail. A. The ”AT relativity” calculation In the ”AT relativity” one usually starts with the Lorentz tr ansformation of the 4- vector kµ(ω/c,k=nω/c) of the light wave from an IFR Sto the relatively moving (along the common x, x′−axes) IFR S′. Note that only the ”e” coordinatization is used in such traditional treatment. Then the Lorentz transformation in the ”e” base of kµcan be written as ω′/c=γ(ω/c−βk1), k′1=γ(k1−βω/c), k′2=k2, k′3=k3, (29) or in terms of the unit wave vector n(which is in the direction of propagation of the wave) ω′=γω(1−βn1), n′1=N(n1−β), n′2= (N/γ)n2, n′3= (N/γ)n3, (30) where N= (1−βn1)−1.Now comes the main point in the derivation. Although the Lore ntz transformation of the 4-vector kµfromStoS′,Eqs.(29) and (30), transforms all four compo- nents of kµthe usual ”AT relativity” treatment considers the transfor mation of the temporal part of kµ,i.e., the frequency, as independent of the transformation o f the spatial part of kµ,i.e., the unit wave vector n,and thus the ”AT relativity” deals with two independent physical phenomena - the Doppler eﬀect and the aberration of light. We note once again that such distinction is possible only in the ”e” coordinati zation; in the ”r” base the metric tensor is not diagonal and consequently the separation of th e temporal and spatial parts does not exist. Thus the ”AT relativity” calculation is restrict ed to the ”e” base. In agreement with such theoretical treatment the existing experiments ( including the modern experiments based on collinear laser spectroscopy; see, e.g., [30–32], or the review [33]) are designed in such a way to measure either the Doppler eﬀect or the aberrati on of light. Let us write the above transformation in the form from which one can determin e the quantities in (28) and then compare with the experiments. The spectograph is at res t in the laboratory (the S frame) and the light source (at rest in the S′frame) is moving with vrelative to S.Then in the usual ”AT relativity” approach only the ﬁrst relation from (29), or (30), is used, which means that, in the same way as shown in previous cases, the ”AT relativity” deals with two diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime, here ωandω′.Then writting the transformation of the temporal part of kµ,i.e., of ω,in terms of the wavelength λwe ﬁnd λ=γλ0(1−βcosθ), (31) where λis the wavelength received in the laboratory from the moving source (the shifted line),λ0(=λ′) is the natural wavelength (the unshifted line) and θis the angle of krelative to the direction of vas measured in the laboratory. The nonrelativistic treatme nt of the Doppler eﬀect predicts λ=λ0(1−βcosθ),and in the classical case the Doppler shift does not exist for θ=π/2. This transverse Doppler eﬀect ( θ=π/2, λ=γλ0,orν=ν0/γ) is always, in the traditional, ”AT relativity,” approach cons idered to be a direct consequence 22of time dilatation; it is asserted (e.g. [8]) that the freque ncies must be related as the inverse of the times in the usual relation for the time dilatation △t=△t0γ. It is usually interpreted [33]: ”The Doppler shift experiments ... compare the rates o f two ”clocks” that are in motion relative to each other. They measure time dilatation (my emphasis) and can test the validity of the special relativity in this respect.” Similarly it is d eclared in [30]: ”The experiment represents a more than tenfold improvement over other Doppl er shift measurements and veriﬁes the time dilation eﬀect (my emphasis) at an accuracy level of 2.3ppm.” Obviously, as we said, the Doppler shift experiments are theoretically analysed only by means of the ”AT relativity,” which treats the transformation of the tem poral part of kµas independent of the transformation of the spatial part of kµ. In the Ives and Stilwell type experiments the measurements a re conducted at symmetric observation angles θandθ+1800; particularly in [29] θis chosen to be ≃00. The wavelength in the direction of motion is obtained from (31) as λb=γλ0(1−βcosθ),while that one in the opposite direction (the angle θ+ 1800) isλr=γλ0(1 +βcosθ),and then △λb=\|λb−λ0\|= \|λ0(1−γ+βγcosθ)\|,△λr=\|λr−λ0\|=\|λ0(γ−1 +βγcosθ)\|,and the diﬀerence in shifts is △λ=△λr− △λb= 2λ0(γ−1)≃λ0β2, (32) where the last relation holds for β≪1.Note that the redshift due to the transverse Doppler eﬀect ( λ0β2) is independent on the observation angle θ. In the nonrelativistic case △λ= 0, the transverse Doppler shift is zero. Ives and Stilwell foun d the agreement of the experi- mental results with the relation (32) and not with the classi cal result △λ= 0. However, a more careful analysis shows that the agreement be tween the ”AT relativ- ity” prediction Eq.(32) and the experiments [29] is, contra ry to the general belief, only an ”apparent” agreement and not the ”true” one. This agreement actually happens for the following reasons. First, the theoretical result (32) is ob tained in the ”e” coordinatization in which one can speak about the frequency ωand the wave vector kas well-deﬁned quantities. Using the matrix Tµ ν,which transforms the ”e” coordinatization to the ”r” coordi natization, kµ r=Tµ νkν e,(see, [ I]) one ﬁnds k0 r=k0 e−k1 e−k2 e−k3 e, ki r=ki e,whence we conclude that in the ”r” base the theoretical predictions for the components of a 4-vector, i.e., for λ,will be quite diﬀerent than in the ”e” base, i.e., than the res ult (32), and thus not in the agreemement with the experiment [29]. Further, the spec iﬁc choice of θ(θ≃00) in the experiments [29] is the next reason for the agreement with th e ”AT relativity” result (32). Namely, if θ= 00thann1= 1, n2=n3= 0, and kµis (ω/c, ω/c, 0,0).From (29) or (30) one ﬁnds that in S′tooθ′= 00, n′1= 1 and n′2=n′3= 0 (the same holds for θ= 1800, n1=−1,thenθ′= 1800andn′1=−1). In the experiments [29] the emitter is the moving ion (its rest frame is S′), while the observer is the spectrometer at rest in the labor atory (theSframe). Since in [29] the angle of the ray emitted by the ion at rest is chosen to beθ′= 00(1800), then the angle of this ray measured in the laboratory, wher e the ion is moving, will be the same θ= 00(1800). (Similarly happens in the modern versions [30,32] of the Ives-Stilwell experiment; the experiments [30,32] mak e use of an atomic or ionic beam as a moving light analyzer (the accelerated ion is the ”observe r”) and two collinear laser beams (parallel and antiparallel to the particle beam) as light so urces (the emitter), which are at rest in the laboratory.) From this consideration we conclud e that in these experiments one can consider only the Doppler eﬀect, that is, the transforma tion of ω(the temporal part of 23kµ;kain the ”e” base), and not the aberration of light, i.e., the tr ansformation of n,i.e., k,(the spatial part of kµ); because of that they found the agreement between the relat ion (31) (or (32)) with the experiments. However, the relations (29) and (30) reveal that in the case of an arbitrary θthe transformation of the temporal part of kµcannot be considered as independent of the transformation of the spatial part, wh ich means that in this case one cannot expect that the relation (32), taken alone, will be in agreement with the experiments performed at some arbitrary θ.Such experiments were, in fact, recently conducted and we discuss them here. Pobedonostsev and collaborators [34] performed the Ives-S tilwell type experiment but improved the experimental setup and, what is particularly i mportant, the measurements were conducted at symmetric observation angles 770and 2570.The work was done with a beam of H+ 2ions at energies 175 ,180,210,225,260 and 275 keV,and the radiation from hydrogen atoms in excited state, which are formed as a result of disintegration of accelerated H+ 2,was observed. The radiation from the moving hydrogen atoms, giving the Doppler shifted lines, was observed together with the radiation fro m the resting atoms existing in the same working volume, and giving an unshifted line. The si milar work was reported in [35] in which a beam of H+ 3ions at energy 310 keVwas used and the measurements were conducted at symmetric observation angles 820and 2620.The results of the experiments [34] and [35] markedly diﬀered from all previous experiments tha t were performed at observation angles θ= 00(and 1800). Therefore in [35] Pobedonostsev declared: ”In comparing the wavelength of Doppler shifted line from a moving emitter wit h the wavelength of an identical static emitter, the experimental data corroborate the clas sical formula for the Doppler eﬀect, not the relativistic one.” Thus, instead of to ﬁnd the ”relativistic” result △λ≃λ0β2(32), (actually the ”AT relativity” result), they found the class ical result △λ≃0,i.e., they found that the redshift due to the transverse Doppler eﬀect ( λ0β2)is dependent on the observation angleθ. This experimental result strongly support our assertion t hat the agreement between the ”AT relativity” and the Ives-Stilwell type experiments is only an ”apparent” agreement and not the ”true” one. B. The ”TT relativity” approach As already said in the ”TT relativity” neither the Doppler eﬀ ect nor the aberration of light exist separately as well deﬁned physical phenomena. A s shown in Sec.3.3 here and in [I],in 4D spacetime the temporal distances (e.g., τEandτµ) refer to diﬀerent quantities, which are not connected by the Lorentz transformation; the s ame happens with ωandω′as the temporal parts of kµ. And, as Gamba [6] stated, the fact that the measurements of s uch quantities were made by twoobservers does not mean that relativity has something to do with the problem. In the ”TT relativity” the entire 4D quanti ty has to be considered both in the theory and in experiments. Therefore, in order to theore tically discuss the experiments of the Ives-Stilwell type we choose as the relevant quantity the wave vector kaand its square, for which it holds that kagabkb= 0. (33) First we consider the experiments [34] and [35] since they sh owed the disagreement with the traditional theory, i.e., with the ”AT relativity.” The pro ductkagabkbis a Lorentz scalar 24and it is also independent of the choice of the coordinatizat ion. Hence we can calculate that product kagabkbin the ”e” base and in the rest frame of the emitter (the S′frame); the emitter is the ion moving in S,the rest frame of the spectrometer, i.e., in the laboratory frame. Then kain the ”e” base and in S′is represented by k′µ= (ω′/c)(1,cosθ′,sinθ′,0) andk′µk′ µ= 0.The observer (the spectrometer) in the laboratory frame wil l look at the same 4D quantity kaand ﬁnd the Lorentz transformed wave vector kµas kµ= [γ(ω′/c)(1 +βcosθ′), γ(ω′/c)(cosθ′+β),(ω′/c) sinθ′,0], whence kµkµis also = 0 .From that transformation one can ﬁnd that n1= (n′1+β)/(1 +βn′1), n2=n′2/γ(1 +βn′1), n3=n′3/γ(1 +βn′1), or that sinθ= sinθ′/γ(1 +βcosθ′),cosθ= (cos θ′+β)/(1 +βcosθ′), tanθ= sinθ′/γ(β+ cosθ′). (34) The relation (34) reveals that not only ωis changed (the Doppler eﬀect) when going from S′toSthan also the angle of krelative to the direction of vis changed (the aberration of light). This means that if the observation of the unshifted l ine (i.e., of the frequency ω′=ω0 from the atom at rest) is performed at an observation angle θ′inS′,the rest frame of the emitter, then the same light wave (from the same but now moving atom) will have the shifted frequency ωand will be seen at an observation angle θ(generally, /negationslash=θ′) inS,the rest frame of the spectrometer. In S′the quantities ω′andθ′deﬁne k′µ,and this propagation 4-vector satisﬁes the relation k′µk′ µ= 0,which is the representation of the relation (33) in the ”e” base and in the S′frame. The quantities ω′andθ′are connected with the corresponding ω andθ,that deﬁne the corresponding kµinS,by the ”e” base Lorentz transformation of k′µ. Then kµis such that it also satisﬁes the relation kµkµ= 0 (the representation of the same relation (33) in the ”e” base and now in the Sframe). The authors of the experiments [34] (and [35]) made the observation of the radiation from the ato m at rest (the unshifted line) and from a moving atom at the same observation angle. The prec eding discussion shows that if they succeeded to see ω0(λ0) from the atom at rest at some symmetric observation angles θ′(/negationslash= 0) and θ′+ 1800than they could not see the assymetric Doppler shift (from moving atoms) at the same angles θ=θ′(andθ′+ 1800). This was the reason that they detected △λ≃0 and not △λ≃λ0β2.But we expect that the result △λ≃λ0β2can be seen if the similar measurements of the frequencies, i.e., the wa velengths, of the radiation from moving atoms would be performed not at θ=θ′than at θdetermined by the relation (34). Recently, Bekljamishev [36] came to the same conclusions an d explained the results of the experiments [34] and [35] taking into account the aberra tion of light together with the Doppler eﬀect. It is argued in [36] that Eq.(31) for the Doppl er eﬀect can be realized only when the condition for the aberration angle is fulﬁlled, △θ=βsinθ′, (35) where △θ=θ′−θ,andβis taken to be β≪1.The relation (35) directly follows from the expression for sin θin (34) taking that β≪1.The assymetric shift will be seen when the 25collimator assembly is tilted at a velocity dependent angle △θ.Instead of to work, as usual, with the arms of the collimator at ﬁxed angles θandθ+ 1800,Bekljamishev [36] proposed that the collimator assembly must be constructed in such a wa y that there is the possibility of the correction of the observation angles independently f or both arms; for example, the arm at angle θ(θ+ 1800) has to be tilted clockwise (counter-clockwise) by the aber ration angle△θ.Otherwise the assymetry in the Doppler shifts will not be obs erved. Thus the experiments [34] and [35] would need to be repeated taking in to account Bekljamishev’s proposition. The positive result for the Doppler shift △λ(32), when the condition for the aberration angle △θ(35) is fulﬁlled, will deﬁnitely show that it is not possible to treat the Doppler eﬀect and the aberration of light as separate, well- deﬁned, eﬀects, i.e., that it is the ”TT relativity,” and not the ”AT relativity,” which correct ly explains the experiments that test the special relativity. VII. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION The analysis of the experiments which test the special relat ivity shows that they agree with the predictions of the ”TT relativity” and not, as usual ly supposed, with those of the ”AT relativity.” In the ”muon” experiment the ﬂuxes of muons on a mountain, Nm, and at sea level, Ns, are measured. The ”AT relativity” predicts diﬀerent value s of the ﬂux Ns(for the same measured Nm) in diﬀerent synchronizations, but the measured Nsis independent of the chosen coordinatization. Further, for some synchroniz ations these predicted values of the ﬂux at sea level Nsare quite diﬀerent than the measured ones. The reason for suc h disagreement, as explained in the text, is that in the usual, ”AT relativity,” analysis of the ”muon” experiment, for example, the lifetimes τEandτµare considered to refer to the same temporal distance (the same quantity) measured by the obser vers in two relatively moving IFRs. But the transformation connecting τEandτµ(the dilatation of time) is only a part of the Lorentz transformation written in the ”e” base, and, act ually, τEandτµrefer to diﬀerent quantities in 4D spacetime. Although their measurements we re made by twoobservers, the relativity has nothing to do with the problem, since τEandτµare diﬀerent 4D quantities. The ”TT relativity,” in contrast to the ”AT relativity,” com pletely agrees with the ”muon” experiments in all IFRs and all possible coordinatizations .In the ”TT relativity” the same 4D quantity is considered in diﬀerent IFRs and diﬀerent coordinatizati ons; instead of to work with τEandτµthe ”TT relativity” deals with the spacetime length land formulate the radioactive-decay law in terms of covariantly deﬁned qu antities. In the Michelson-Morley experiment the traditional, ”AT re lativity,” derivation of the fring shift △Ndeals only with the calculation, in the ”e” base, of path leng ths (optical or geometrical) in SandS′,or, in other words, with the calculation of t1andt2(inSandS′), which are the times required for the complete trips OM1OandOM2Oalong the arms of the Michelson-Morley interferometer. The null fringe shif t obtained with such calculation is only in an ”apparent,” not ”true,” agreement with the obse rved null fringe shift, since this agreement was obtained by an incorrect procedure. Name ly it is supposed in such derivation that, e.g., t1andt′ 1refer to the same quantity measured by the observers in relatively moving IFRs SandS′that are connected by the Lorentz transformation. However the relation t′ 1=γt1is not the Lorentz transformation of some 4D quantity, and t′ 1andt1do 26not correspond to the same 4D quantity considered in S′andSrespectively. The improved ”AT relativity” calculation from [24] (again in the ”e” base ) determines the increment of phase along some path not only by the segment of geometric pat h length than also by the wavelength in that segment, and ﬁnds a non-null fringe shift . But we show that the non-null theoretical result for the fringe shift, which is obtained i n [24], is a consequence of the fact that again two diﬀerent quantities k0 el0eandk′0 el′ 0e(only the parts of the covariantly deﬁned phase (22) φ=kagablb) are considered to refer to the same 4D quantity, and thus tha t these two quantities are connected by the Lorentz transformation . The ”TT relativity,” in contrast to the ”AT relativity” calculations, deals always with the c ovariantly deﬁned 4D quantities (in the Michelson-Morley experiment, e.g., the covariantl y deﬁned phase (22) φ=kagablb), which areconnected by the Lorentz transformation. The ”TT relativity” calculations yields the observed null fringe shift and that result holds for all I FRs and all coordinatizations. The same conclusions can be drawn for the Kennedy-Thorndike type experiments. In the Ives-Stilwell type experiments the agreement betwee n the ”AT relativity” calcu- lation for the Doppler eﬀect and the experiments is again onl y an ”apparent” agreement and not the ”true” one. Namely the transverse Doppler shift ( λ0β2, (32)) is obtained in the ”e” coordinatization in which one can speak about the freque ncyωand the wave vector k as well-deﬁned quantities. Further in the usual ”AT relativ ity” approach only the transfor- mation of ω(the temporal part of kµ) is considered, while the aberration of light, i.e., the transformation of n,i.e.,k,(the spatial part of kµ) is neglected. Thus in this case too the ”AT relativity” deals with two diﬀerent quantities in 4D spa cetime, ωandω′, which are not connected by the Lorentz transformation. However, for the s peciﬁc choice of the observation angles θ′= 00(1800) inS′(the rest frame of the emitter), one ﬁnds from the transforma tion ofkµthatθinSis again = 00(1800). Since in the experiments [29], and its modern versions [30,32], just such angles were chosen, it was possible to con sider only the transformation of ω, i.e., only the Doppler eﬀect, and not the concomitant aberr ation of light, and because of that they found the agreement between the relation (31) (o r (32)) and the experiments. When the experiments were performed at observation angles θ/negationslash= 00(and 1800), as in [34] and [35], the results disagreed with the ”AT relativity” cal culation which takes into account only the transformation of ω, i.e., only the Doppler eﬀect. The ”TT relativity” calculat ion considers the same 4D quantity the wave vector ka(or its square) in SandS′,i.e., it con- siders the Doppler eﬀect and the aberration of light togethe r as unseparated phenomena. The results of such calculation agrees with the experiments [29] and [30,32] (made at θ= 00 (1800)), but also predict the positive result for the Doppler shif t△λ(32) in the experiments of the type [34] and [35], if the condition for the aberration angle△θ(35) is fulﬁlled, which agrees with Bekljamishev’s explanation [36] of the experim ents [34] and [35]. The discussion in this paper clearly shows that the ”TT relativity” completely agrees with all considered experiments, in all IFRs and all possibl e coordinatizations, while the ”AT relativity” appears as an unsatisfactory relativistic theory. These results are directly contrary to the generally accepted opinion about the validi ty of the ”AT relativity.” 27REFERENCES [1] T.Ivezi´ c, Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 105 (1999). [2] T.Ivezi´ c, Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 507 (1999). [3] T.Ivezi´ c, submitted to Phys. Rev.A. [4] T Ivezi´ c, preprint SCAN-9802018 (on the CERN server). [5] F. Rohrlich, Nuovo Cimento B 45, 76 (1966). [6] A. Gamba, Am. J. Phys. 35, 83 (1967). [7] R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leightonn and M. Sands, The Feynman le ctures on physics, Vol.1 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1964) Sec.15. [8] C. Kittel, W.D. Knight and M.A. Ruderman, Mechanics (McG raw-Hill, New York, 1965). [9] D.H. Frisch and J.H. Smith, Am. J. Phys. 31, 342 (1963). [10] N. Easwar and D.A. MacIntire, Am. J. Phys. 59, 589 (1991). [11] B. Rossi and D.B. Hall, Phys. Rev. 59, 223 (1941). [12] D.S. Ayres et al., Phys. Rev. D 3, 1051 (1971). [13] M.P. Haugan and C.M. Will, Phys. Today 40,69 (1987). [14] J. Bailey et al., Nature 268, 301 (1977); J. Bailey at al., Nucl. Phys. B 150, 1 (1979). [15] D. Newman, G.W. Ford, A. Rich, and E. Sweetman, Phys. Rev . Lett. 40, 1355 (1978); F. Combley, F.J.M. Farley, J.H. Field, and E. Picasso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1383 (1979); R.D. Sard, Phys. Rev. D. 21, 549 (1980). [16] Young-Sea Huang, Helv. Phys.Acta 66,346 (1993); Phys. Essays 9,21 (1996); Phys. Essays 9,340 (1996). [17] J.H. Field, Helv. Phys.Acta 66,875 (1993) [18] R.A. Nelson, J. Math. Phys .28, 2379 (1987); J. Math. Phys .35, 6224 (1994) . [19] R.M. Wald, General relativity (The University of Chica go Press, Chicago, 1984). [20] D.A.T. Vanzella and G.E.A. Matsas, H.W. Crater, Am. J. P hys.64, 1075 (1996). [21] T.Ivezi´ c, preprint SCAN-9810078 (on the CERN server) . [22] A.A. Michelson, E.H. Morley, Am. J. Sci. 34, 333 (1887). [23] R.A. Schumacher, Am.J. Phys. 62, 609 (1994). [24] R.B. Driscoll, Phys. Essays 10, 394 (1997). [25] T.S. Jaseja, A. Javan, J, Murray, and C.H. Townes, Phys. Rev. A 133, 1221 (1964). [26] A. Brillet and J.L. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 549 (1979). [27] R.J. Kennedy and E.M. Thorndike, Phys. Rev. B. 42, 400 (1932). [28] D. Hils and J.L. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1697 (1990). [29] H.E. Ives and G.R. Stilwell, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 28,215 (1938); 31,369 (1941). [30] R.W. McGowan, D.M. Giltner, S.J. Sternberg S.A. Lee, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 70, 251 (1993). [31] E. Riis, U.A. Andersen, N. Bjerre, O.Poulsen, S.A. Lee, and J.L. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 81 (1988). [32] R. Klein et al., Z. Phys. A 342, 455 (1992). [33] M. Kretzschmar, Z. Phys. A - Hadrons and Nuclei 342, 463 (1992). [34] L.A. Pobedonostsev, Y.M. Kramarovsky, P.F. Parshin, B .K. Seleznev and A.B. Berezin, Journal of Technical Physics 3, 84 (1989) (in Russian). [35] L.A. Pobedonostsev, Galilean Electrodynamics 6, 117 (1995). [36] V.O. Bekljamishev, Journal of Technical Physics 69, 124 (1999) (in Russian). 28
arXiv:physics/0007032v1 [physics.ao-ph] 11 Jul 2000Chapman’s model for ozone concentration: earth’s slowing rotation eﬀect in the atmospheric past J. C. Flores†and S. Montecinos‡ †Universidad de Tarapac´ a, Departamento de F´ ısica, Casill a 7-D, Arica, Chile. ‡Universidad de la Frontera, Departamento de F´ ısica, Casil la 54-D, Temuco, Chile. Chapman’s model for ozone concentration is studied. In this nonlinear model, the photodissociation coeﬃcients for O2andO3are time-depending due to earth-rotation. From the Kapitsa’s method, valid in t he high fre- quency limit, we ﬁnd the criterion for the existence of equil ibrium solutions. These solutions are depending on the frequency, and require a rotation period Twhich satisﬁes T < T 1orT > T 2. Where the critical periods T1andT2, withT2> T1, are a function of the parameters of the system (reaction rat es and photodissociation coeﬃcients). Conjectures respect t o the retardation of the earth’s rotation, due to friction, suggest that the crit erion was not even veriﬁed in the atmospheric past. Key words: Atmospheric Physics. Chemical Physics. Nonline ar Dynamic Systems. Oscillations. 11.- Introduction The dynamics of the ozone layer in the atmosphere has diﬀeren t basic process like: chemical reactions, photochemical reaction s and transport (dif- fusion, convection, etc.). In a general point of view, this d ynamics is complex and requires some approximations to be studied. In this sens e, we consider a photochemical model proposed by S. Chapman (Brasseur, 1986 ; Chapman, 1930; Wayne, 1991). This model considers a set of reactions b etween the oxygen components. Explicitly, R1) O+O2+M→O3+M, R2) O+O3→2O2, R3) O2+hν→O+O, R4) O3+hν→O+O2. In the reaction of the ozone production R1, Mdenotes any atmospheric element acting as catalyzer. The reaction R2 denotes the los s of oxygen O and ozone O3producing molecular oxygen O2. R3 and R4 correspond to photochemical destruction process related to the solar rad iation (symbolized byhν). The time evolution equations for the constituents consider the above re- actions for variable concentration assuming the concentra tion of O2being stationary. Let XandYbe the concentration of OandO3respectively. Then, the Chapman’s model (see for instance Brasseur, 1986; Montecinos, 1998; 1999) considers the time evolution equations for the c oncentrations given by dX dt=J1+J2Y−(k1+k2Y)X, (1) 2dY dt=k1X−(J2+k2X)Y, (2) where, on the right hand, the positive terms are production r ates, and the negative ones are loss rates. In the nonlinear system (1,2), the quantities J1andJ2are related to the reactions R3 and R4 and correspond to the photodissociation of O2andO3respectively. The important fact is that they dependent on the sun’s radiation, and then, they are periodi c in time with a period T= 24 hours. In this paper, and by simplicity, we assume Ji(t) =Jo i(1−cosωt), i= 1,2 (3) where ω= 2π/T, and Jo iare positive constants. On the other hand, the positive constants k1andk2in (1,2), are temperature dependent. Also they are dependent on the O2concentration, and related to the reaction velocity in R1 and R2 respectively (DeMore, 1994). In this paper we propose an analytical study of the nonlinear model (1- 3). In a general point of view, the study of this system is a diﬃ cult task, nevertheless, some interesting results can be ﬁnd in the hig h frequency ( ω) limit. In fact, we use a method proposed originally by Kapits a (Landau, 1982) for a mechanical particle in a ﬁeld with rapid temporal oscillations in the parameters and nonlinear terms. We ﬁnd explicitly the so lutions of the systems (1-3) in the high frequency regime (19,20). They are the equilibrium solution for the time-averaged concentration. Calculatio ns tell us that no solution exist in some frequency range. The study of the beha vior of this model, for diﬀerent frequencies, has a physical interest be cause earth period of rotation changes with the geological age. It is a known fac t that the rotation of earth is gradually slowing down by friction. In f act, the estimated rotation velocity diminishes by 4.4 hours every billon of ye ars (Shu, 1982). For explicit calculations, we assume the following values f or the parame- ters: Jo 1∼107[1/s];Jo 2∼10−3[1/s];k1∼10[1/s];k2∼2.5×10−15[1/s],(4) 3corresponding to the values for the ozone layer altitude at, more or less, 35 km. Finally we note that the case of small frequency ( ω→0) can be solved. In fact, here the parameters Ji(t) evolve slowly with time and then, they can be assumed as constant in the integration process of (1,2). S o the solutions corresponding to the ‘ﬁxed point’ (dx dt∼dy dt∼0, for deﬁnitions see (Seydel, 1988; Wio, 1997)) are Y=−Jo 1 4Jo 2+/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt/parenleftBiggJo 1 4Jo 2/parenrightBigg2 +k1Jo 1 2k2Jo 2, (5) X=Y k1−k2YJ2(t). (6) Namely, in this approximation, the variable Yis constant and Xvaries linearly with the dissociation coeﬃcient. Moreover, the so lutions (5,6) are consistent with the numerical solution in the stratosphere (Fabian, 1982; Montecinos, 1996). We note that, from (5), it is easy to show t hat the variable Ysatisﬁes Y≤k1 k2.In fact, it is a general bound for the solution of the systems (1,2) (Montecinos, 2000). 2.- The method of Kapitsa As said before, we shall study the system (1-3) in the high fre quency regime. High frequency means here small period of oscillati onsTrespect to the relaxation-time TRfor the slow variables. Assume the separation of the concentrations XandYin a slow temporal variation ( xandy) and other fast ( εandη,respectively). Namely, X=x+ε;Y=y+η, (7) where the fast variables are periodic with temporal average zero, namely, 4/angbracketleftε/angbracketrightT=/angbracketleftη/angbracketrightT= 0. (8) The equation (1) can be re-written like dx dt+dε dt=Jo 1+Jo 2y−(k1+k2y)x−(Jo 1+Jo 2y)cosωt+ (Jo 1−Jo 2cosωt−k2x)η−(k1+k2y)ε−k2εη, (9) and equation (2) becomes dy dt+dη dt=k1x−(Jo 2+k2x)y+Jo 2ycosωt− (Jo 2+k2x−Jo 2cosωt)η+ (k1−k2y)ε−k2εη. (10) On the other hand, the fast variables are only related to rapi d oscillation (Landau, 1982). In this way, from the above expression (9,10 ), they are assumed to be a solution to the diﬀerential equations: dε dt=−(Jo 1+Jo 2y)cosωt;dη dt=Jo 2ycosωt. (11) At this point a remark becomes necessary. The expression (7) , comple- mented with the above equations (11), deﬁnes a change of vari ables without approximations. Nevertheless, the diﬀerential equations (11) are suggested by the direct oscillatory term in (9) and (10). Kapitsa’s met hod consider the equations fordε dtanddη dtas approximated. In one period, the slow variables are essentially constants and the fast have zero average (8), then, the time average of the equation (9) becomes. dx dt=Jo 1+Jo 2y−(k1+k2y)x−Jo 2/angbracketleftηcosωt/angbracketrightT−k2/angbracketleftεη/angbracketrightT, (12) and, for equation (10), we obtain dy dt=k1x−(Jo 2+k2x)y+Jo 2/angbracketleftηcosωt/angbracketrightT−k2/angbracketleftεη/angbracketrightT. (13) 5Nevertheless, since equations (11) can be solved exactly, ε(t) =−1 ω(Jo 1+Jo 2y)sinωt;η(t) =Jo 2 ωysinωt, (14) the evolution equations for the slow variables become dx dt=Jo 1+Jo 2y−(k1+k2y)x+Jo 2k2 2ω2y(Jo 1+Jo 2y), (15) anddy dt=k1x−(Jo 2+k2x)y+Jo 2k2 2ω2y(Jo 1+Jo 2y). (16) This set of equations are the basis for our analytical result s. They are restricted to the high frequency approximation. This appro ximation becomes given by the ‘expansion’ in 1 /ω2related to the last term in (15,16). Remark that it is an autonomous nonlinear systems and then, without the explicit temporal dependence. This transformation, from a set of equ ations with time-periodic parameters, to other autonomous, is related to the Kapitsa original ideas (Landau, 1982). In a general frame of work, the system (15,16) is complex. Mor eover, the approximation of high frequency is valid when the relaxa tion time TR, of the equations (15,16), is bigger than 2 π/ω. This comparison is a diﬃcult task, nevertheless, the case Jo 2= 0 can be solved exactly to estimate the validity of the approximation. It corresponds formally to e liminate the disso- ciation of O3. The asymptotic solution of the non-autonomous system (1-3 ) is (Montecinos, 2000). X=Jo 1 2k1−Jo 1/radicalBig 4k2 1+ω2cos(ωt−φ), Y =k1 k2, (17) where the phase φis given by the relation: tan φ=ω/2k1. On the other hand, combining the equations (15,16) with (7), in the high f requency ap- proximation we found that the equilibrium solution given by the Kapitsa’s method is: X=Jo 1 2k1−Jo 1 ωsinωt;Y=k1 k2. (18) 6It is direct to show that the exact solution (17) reduces to (1 8) in the high frequency limit. Moreover, the relaxation time TRcan be calculated here analytically. It is given by TR= 1/2k1. So, we expect that the high frequency approximation (15,16) is valid when 4 πk1≪ω. 3.- Existence of equilibrium solutions In this section we are concerned with the ﬁxed point solution (Seydel, 1988; Wio, 1997) of the autonomous set (15,16). This system h ave an equi- librium point ( xo, yo), deﬁned bydx dt=dy dt= 0,and given by the solution of the equations: k2Jo 2/parenleftBigg 2−k1Jo 2 ω2/parenrightBigg y2 o+k2Jo 1/parenleftBigg 1−k1Jo 2 ω2/parenrightBigg yo−k1Jo 1= 0, (19) and xo=(Jo 1+Jo 2yo)/parenleftBig 1 +k2Jo 2 2ω2yo/parenrightBig (k1+k2yo). (20) Equations (19) and (20) deﬁne the homogeneous equilibrium s olution of the autonomous system (15) and (16) and then, with (7) and (14 ), we have the solution of the systems (1,2) in the high frequency regim e. The existence of real solutions, for the second degree equat ion (19), re- quires the inequality 1 ω4−4 k2Jo 1/parenleftBigg 1 +k2Jo 1 2k1Jo 2/parenrightBigg1 ω2+8 k1k2Jo 1Jo 2/parenleftBigg 1 +k2Jo 1 8k1Jo 2/parenrightBigg ≥0,(21) which corresponds to an inequality of second degree for 1 /ω2. Namely, there is no equilibrium solution of (15,16) if and only if, 2 k2Jo 1+1 k1Jo 2−2 k2Jo 1/radicalBigg 1−k2Jo 1 k1Jo 2≤1 ω2≤2 k2Jo 1+1 k1Jo 2+2 k2Jo 1/radicalBigg 1−k2Jo 1 k1Jo 2.(22) 7If we assume the condition k2Jo 1 k1Jo 2≪1, (23) valid for the parameters (4) of section 1, the inequality (22 ) can be re-written for the period T. In fact, there is no equilibrium solution of the system (15, 16) when T1≤T≤T2(no−solution ), (24) where T1= 2π/radicalBigg 2 k1Jo 2;T2= 4π/radicalBigg 1 k2Jo 1. (25) 4.- Earth’s slowing rotation and the existence of solution It is interesting that the inequality (24) gives a region wer e no solution exist. Here we must take care because no oscillating solutio n like (7) exist. In fact, (24) splits the ω−space parameter in three regions: (i) The region deﬁned by T < T 1where a real positive solution ( yo>0) of equation (15) exist, with a negative one ( yo<0) . (ii) The region deﬁned by (24), where no solution of (15) exist. (iii) The region deﬁned by T > T 2where solutions are negative ( yo<0). From (5,6), we known that in the slow frequency limit (region (iii)) a real positive solution exist. Then, Kapits a’s method does not work well in this region, nevertheless, at least it says t hat an oscillating solution exist. At this point we can formulate the following question: since the earth- rotation has diminished by friction, how has the change in ro tation aﬀected 8the existence of the ozone layer ?. This question seems appro priate because the Kapitsa’s method tells us that the frequency of rotation and the ozone concentration are related. Using the parameter values (4), of section 1, we can estimate the critical period (24) : T1∼0.02 hours and T2∼22 hours. Is interesting that the actual period T= 24 hours, is in the region of permitted solution ( T > T 2). Moreover this is suggestive: from the retardation of earth rotation velocity data (4.4 hours/billon of years, (S hu, 1982)), a simple calculation tells us that before24−22 4.4∼0.46 billons years no solution existed because we were in the region (24). This is a surprising estim ation if we consider that actually the ozone layer is believed to have be en in existence 0.7 billon years (Graedel, 1993). 5.- Conclusions We have considered the Chapman’s model for ozone production (1,2). In this nonlinear model, the parameters related to photodisso ciation are periodic in time (3). We were interested at the analytical study of thi s model by using the high frequency approximation, due to Kapitsa. Nam ely, we have considered the autonomous system (15,16), depending on the frequency, for the averaged variable concentrations. The existence of equ ilibrium solutions (ﬁxed points (19,20)) is depending on the frequency. In fact , there are two critical period T1andT2so that for T1< T < T 2there is no equilibrium solution (24). The values for the parameters (4), in section 1, give the cond ition of no- existence (24): 0 .02 hours ≤T≤22 hours, and then compatible with the actual earth’s period of rotation, and existence of the ozon e layer. Moreover, considering the earth’s slowing rotation motion due to fric tion (4.4 hours every billon of years, (Shu, 1982)), we estimate that the ozo ne existence condition is veriﬁed after24−22 4.4∼0.46 billon years (section 4). This is a good estimation if we consider the simplicity of the autonomous m odel given by equations (15,16). The age of the ozone layer is 0.7 billons o f years (Graedel, 1993)). 9Before to ending a remark, equations (15) and (16) are very ad equate to the study of diﬀusion process, which was neglected in the ori ginal equations (1) and (2). In fact, because they are not time depending, whe n we add spatial diﬀusion terms Dd2 dx2XandDd2 dx2Y, they become similar to reaction- diﬀusion-equations. Acknowledgments: This work was possible thanks to Project UTA- Mayor 4725 (Universidad de Tarapac´ a). Useful discussion w ith professor H. Wio, D. Walgraef (visits supported by the FDI-UTA and PELICA N Projects) and M. Pedreros, are acknowledged. References [1] Brasseur G. & Solomon S., 1986: Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere , D. Reidel pub. comp., Holland. [2] Chapman S., 1930: A theory of upper–atmosphere ozone , Mem. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 3, 103. [3] DeMore , W. B., et al, 1994: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modeling , Eval. 11, Natl. Aeronaut. and Space Admin., Jet Propul.Lab., Pasadena. [4] Fabian P., Pyle J. A. and Wells J. R., 1982: Diurnal Variations of Minor Constituents in the Stratosphere Modeled as a Function of La titude and Season , J. Geophys. Res. 87, 4981. [5] Graedel T. E. and Crutzen P. J., 1993: Atmospheric Changes: An Earth Systems Perpective , W. H. Freeman Company, N. Y. [6] Landau L. and Lifchitz E., 1982: Physique Theorique, Vol. 1, Mecanique , Edition Mir. 10[7] Montecinos S., 1996: Reaktionskinetische Photochemische Modellierung de Ozonkonzentration der Mesosph¨ are , Dissertation, Papier Flieger Ver- lag, Clausthal–Zellerfeld (unpublished). [8] Montecinos S., Doebner H. D., 1998: Dynamical systems based on a mesospheric photochemical model , Phys. Lett. 241A , 269. [9] Montecinos S. , Flores J. C. , 2000: Soluciones anal´ ıticas del modelo atmosf´ erico de Chapman , submitted. [10] Montecinos S., Felmer P., 1999: Multiplicity and Stability of Solutions for Chapman and Mesospheric Photochemical Model , J. Geophys. Res. 104, 11799. [11] Seydel R., 1988: From Equilibrium to Chaos , Elseiver, N. Y. [12] Shu F. H., 1982: The Physical Universe , University Science Books, Mill Valley, California. [13] Wayne R. P., 1991: Chemistry of the Atmosphere , Oxford University Press Inc., N. Y. [14] Wio H., 1997: Computational Physics (P. L. Garrido and J. Marro, Eds.), Springer Verlag. 11
arXiv:physics/0007033v1 [physics.optics] 12 Jul 20001 The Channel Capacity of a Fiber Optics Communication System: perturbation theory Evgenii Narimanov and Partha Mitra Abstract — We consider the communication channel given by a ﬁber optical transmission line. We develop a method to perturbatively calculate the information capacity of a non - linear channel, given the corresponding evolution equatio n. Using this technique, we compute the decrease of the chan- nel capacity to the leading order in the perturbative param- eter for ﬁber optics communication systems. I. Introduction TH e performance of any communication system is ul- timately limited by the signal to noise ratio of the re- ceived signal and available bandwidth. This limitation can be stated more formally by using the concept of channel capacity introduced withing the framework of information theory[1]. The channel capacity is deﬁned as the maximum possible bit rate for error-free transmission in the presen ce of noise. For a linear communication channel with additive white Gaussian noise, and a total signal power constraint at the input, the capacity is given by the celebrated Shannon formula[1] C=Wlog/parenleftbigg 1 +P0 PN/parenrightbigg (1) where Wis the channel bandwidth, P0is the average signal power, and PNis the average noise power. Current optical ﬁber systems operate substantially below the fundamental limitation, imposed by the Eq. (1). How- ever, a considerable improvement in the coding schemes for lightwave communications, expected in the near future, may result in the development of systems, whose eﬃciency may approach this fundamental limit. However, the representation of the channel capacity in the standard form (1) is unsuitable for applications to the actual ﬁber optics systems. It was obtained based on the assumption of linearity of the communication chan- nel, while the modern ﬁber optics systems operate in a substantially nonlinear regime. Since the optical transmi s- sion lines must satisfy very strict requirements for bit-er ror- rate (10−12to 10−15), the pulse amplitude should be large enough so that is can be eﬀectively detectable. The in- crease of the number of wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) channels[2] in the modern ﬁber optics communi- cation systems also leads to a substantial increase of the electric ﬁeld intensity in the ﬁber. As a consequence, the Kerr nonlinearity of the ﬁber refractive index n=n0+γI (where Iis the pulse intensity) becomes substantial and should be taken into account. In the present paper we consider corrections to the chan- nel capacity of the optical ﬁber communication system, originating from the nonlinearity of the ﬁber. The tech-the relevant mutual information and subsequent optimiza- tion. To our knowledge, this method appears to be sub- stantially new. II. Fiber Optics Communication System as an Information Channel We consider a typical ﬁber optics communication sys- tem, which consists of a sequence of Nﬁbers each followed by an ampliﬁer (see Fig. 1). The ampliﬁers have to be in- troduced in order to compensate for the power loss in the ﬁber. An inevitable consequence of such design, however, is the generation of the noise in the system, coming from the spontaneous emission in the optical ampliﬁers. For sim- plicity, we will assume that all the ﬁbers and the ampliﬁers of the link are identical. The information is encoded in the electric ﬁeld at the “imput” of the system, typically using the light pulses sent at diﬀerent frequencies. The available bandwidth of the ampliﬁers as well as the increase of the ﬁber absorption away from the “transparency window” near the wavelength λ= 1.55µm, limits the bandwidth of the ﬁber optic com- munication system. The maximum amount of the information, that can be transmitted through the communication system per unit time, is called the channel capacity C. According to the Shannon’s basic result[1], this quantity is given by the max - imum value of the mutual information per second over all possible input distributions: C= max px{H[y]− /an}bracketle{tH[y\|x]/an}bracketri}htpx} (2) The mutual information R=H[y(ω)]− /an}bracketle{tH[y(ω)\|x(ω)]/an}bracketri}htpx (3) is a functional of the “input distribution” px[x(ω)], which represents the encoding of the information using the elec- tric ﬁeld components at diﬀerent frequences Ein(t) =/integraldisplay Wdω x(ω)exp ( iωt) (4) The entropy H[y(ω)] is the measure of the information re- ceived at the output of the communication channel. How- ever, if the channel is noisy, for any output signal there is some uncertainty of what was originally sent. The con- ditional entropy H[y(ω)\|x(ω)] at the output for a given x(ω) represents this uncertainty. The entropies H[y(ω)] and H[y(ω)\|x(ω)] are deﬁned in terms of the corresponding distributions p(y) and p(y\|x) via the standard relation/integraldisplay2 Fig. 1 The schematical representation of a fiber optics communication channel where p≡py(y) for the entropy H[y(ω)], and p≡p(y\|x) for the entropy H[y(ω)\|x(ω)], and the functional integral is deﬁned in the standard way /integraldisplay Dξ(ω)≡lim M→∞cM/bracketleftbigg ΠM m=1/integraldisplay dξ(ωm)/bracketrightbigg (6) where is a normalization constant. For any communication link, the signal power is limited by the system hardware. Therefore, the maximum of the mutual information in (1) should be found under the con- straint of the ﬁxed total power P0at the input: P0=/integraldisplay Dx(ω)\|x(ω)\|2px[x(ω)] (7) If the propagation in the communication channel is de- scribed by a linear equation, then the input-output relatio n for the system is given by y(ω) =K(ω)x(ω) +n(ω) (8) where n(ω) is the noise in the channel. In this approxima- tion, the problem of ﬁnding the maximum of the mutual information can be solved exactly, with the corresponding input distribution pxbeing Gaussian[1]. If the ampliﬁers compensate exactly for the power losses in the ﬁbers, the Channel Capacity is given by the Shannon formula (1). As follows from (1), the better bit rates can be obtained for the higher signal-to-noise ratio P0/PN. With this in mind, the optics ﬁber communication systems are designed to operate with the pulses of high power. As a result, the optics ﬁber links operate in the regime, in which due to the Kerr nonlinearity the refraction index of the ﬁber strongly depends on the local electric ﬁeld intensity. Therefore, a modern ﬁber optics communication system is, in fact, an essentially nonlinear communication channel, and cannot be adequately described within the framework of the Shan- non’slinear theory. III. The Model The ﬁrst step in the calculation of the channel capacity is to ﬁnd the “input-output” relation for the communication channel. The time evolution of the electric ﬁeld in the ﬁberE(z, t), where zis the distance along the ﬁber, can be accuarately described in the “envelope approximation”[2] , when E(z, t) = A(z, t)exp ( i(β0z−ω0t)) + c.c.(9) where the function represents the slowly (compared toin the ﬁber. The evolution of A(z, t) is described by the equation ∂A ∂z+β1∂A ∂t+i 2β2∂2A ∂t2+α 2A=iγ\|A\|2A (10) Here the coeﬃcients βdescribe the frequency dependence of the wavenumber β(ω) = β0+β1ω+β2 2ω2+O/bracketleftbig ω3/bracketrightbig (11) where ωis measured from the center of the band ω0. The equation (10) neglects the eﬀects such as the stimu- lated Raman scattering and the stimulated Brillouin scat- tering[2], compared to the Kerr nonlinearity of the refrac- tion index of the ﬁber, represented by the term γ\|A\|2A. The optical ampliﬁers incorporated into the communi- cation system (see Fig. 1) compensate for the power losses in the ﬁber, but due to spontaneous emission each of them will inevitably introduce noise n(t) = exp (iω0t)/integraltext dω n ωexp (iωt) into the channel. Generally, even in a single optical ampliﬁer, the noise distribution at any given frequency ω0+ωwithin the channel bandwidth n(ω) is close to a Gaussian: pn[n(ω)]∼exp/bracketleftBigg −\|n(ω)\|2 Pω N/bracketrightBigg (12) This is even more so in a system with many independent ampliﬁers, due to the Central Limit Theorem. For simplic- ity, the noise spectrum Pω Ncan be assumed to be ﬂat. If the envelope function just before the ampliﬁer is A(t)≡A0 ωexp(iωt), then immediately after the ampliﬁer Aω= exp/parenleftBigα 2d/parenrightBig A0 ω+nω (13) where dis the span of a single ﬁber. The equations (10), (13) deﬁne the evolution of the elec- tric ﬁeld envelope over one “ﬁber-apliﬁer” link of the com- munication system. The total “input-output” relation will then involve solving the corresponding equations for all N iterations of the single ﬁber-ampliﬁer unit. IV. The Perturbative Framework If one is able to calculate the “output” signal y(ω) in terms of the “input” x(ω) and the noise contributions of each of the ampliﬁers n{α} ω, α= 1, . . . , N , y(ω) = Φ/parenleftBig x(ω);nω{1}, . . . , n ω{N}/parenrightBig (14) then the the conditional distribution p(y\|x) can be simply calculated as follows: p(y\|x) =/braceleftbigg ΠN−1 α=1/integraldisplay Dnω{α}pn/bracketleftBig nω{α}/bracketrightBig/bracerightbigg ×pn/bracketleftBig y(ω)−Φ/parenleftBig x(ω);nω{1}, . . . , n ω{N}/parenrightBig/bracketrightBig (15) where is the distribution function of the noise, produced3 then be directly related to the input distribution px(x) via the standard relation py(y) =/integraldisplay Dx(ω)p[y(ω)\|x(ω)]px[x(ω)] (16) Using Eqns. (15),(16), one is able to express the mutual information in terms of a single distribution px. The calcu- lation of the channel capacity then reduces to a standard problem of ﬁnding the maximum of a (nontrivial) func- tional. The equation (10) is, in fact, the well studied [3] non- linear Shroedinger equation, with the time and distance variables interchanged. Only some partial solutions of thi s equation are known, corresponding to solitons[3], [4]. How - ever, in order to calculate the channel capacity, one needs t o ﬁnd the general input-output relation for the communica- tion system. This implies solving a set of Nessentially non- linear equations (10) for arbitrary initial conditions. Even knowing some partial solutions, doing such calculation ex- actly for an essentially nonlinear system is not possible in a closed form. In order to make progress, we note the presence of a nat- ural perturbation parameter in the problem, namely γ.In fact, the ﬁber equation (10) is already an approximation, derived in the limit, when the change in the eﬀective re- fraction index due to pulse propagation, described by the nonlinear term iγ\|A\|2A, issmall compared to the “un- perturbed” value of the index of refraction n0. We have developed a perturbative technique, when the solution of the nonlinear evolution equation, is represented as a power series in γ. Solving (10) separately for each power of γ, and using (13), for the input-output relation of a single ﬁber-ampliﬁer unit Φ(n) ω, deﬁned as A(n) ω= Φ(n) ω/parenleftBig A(n−1) ω/parenrightBig , (17) we obtain: Φ(n) ω/parenleftBig Aω(n−1)/parenrightBig =/bracketleftBigg A(n−1) ω+∞/summationdisplay ℓ=1γℓF(ℓ) ω/parenleftBig A(n−1) ω/parenrightBig/bracketrightBigg ×exp(−iκωd) +nω (18) where dis the length of a single ﬁber, κω=β1ω−1 2β2ω2(19) The procedure for the calculation of the functions F(ℓ) ω, de- scribed in detail Appendix A, can be carried to an arbitrary order ℓ. The further calculation then involves the following steps: •Iterating Eq. (18) Ntimes, to obtain the “input- output” relation for the whole communication system Φω/bracketleftBig x(ω);n(1) ω, . . . , n(N) ω/bracketrightBig •substituting the result into Eqns. (15), (16) to obtain the conditional distribution p(x\|y) and the output dis- tribution ( ) in terms of the input distribution ( )•calculating the entropies H[y(ω)] and H[x(ω)\|y(ω)], and the mutual information R Following these steps, the calculation of the channel ca- pacity becomes a straightforward procedure. In Appendix B we describe it in detail, using a simple nonlinear channel y(ω) =x(ω)exp(−φ[x(ω)]) +n(ω) as an example. V. The Fiber Link Channel Capacity After a tedious, but straigthforward calculation, we ob- tain: H[y(ω)] = H0[y(ω)]−∆C1−∆Hy+O/parenleftbig γ4/parenrightbig (20) and H[y(ω)\|x(ω)] = H0[y(ω)\|x(ω)] + ∆ C2+O/parenleftbig γ4/parenrightbig (21) where H0[y] andH0[x\|y] are given by the standard expres- sions for a linear channel[1]. In the limit of large signal-t o- noise ratio P0≫PNwe obtain: ∆C1=N2W/parenleftbiggγP0 α/parenrightbigg2 Q1/parenleftbigg αd,β2 2W4 α2/parenrightbigg (22) ∆C2=4 3/parenleftbig N2−1/parenrightbig W/parenleftbiggγP0 α/parenrightbigg2 Q2/parenleftbigg αd,β2 2W4 α2/parenrightbigg (23) and the functions Q1andQ2are deﬁned as follows: Q1(u, z) =/integraldisplay1/2 −1/2dx1/integraldisplay1/2 −1/2dx2/integraldisplay¯x 1/2dx ×f(u, z;x1, x2, x) (24) Q2(u, z) =/integraldisplay1/2 −1/2dx1/integraldisplay1/2 −1/2dx2/integraldisplay1/2 −1/2dx ×f(u, z;x1, x2, x) (25) where ¯ x≡max [1 /2,1/2 +x1+x2], and f(u, z;x1, x2, x)≡/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1−exp/parenleftbig −u−iv2/parenrightbig/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 1 +v2(26) where v≡z(x−x1)(x−x2) (27) The correction ∆Hy=γ2W/integraldisplay Dy(ω)p(0) y[y(ω)]/parenleftBig p(1) y[y(ω)]/parenrightBig2 (28) is caused by the deviations of the otput distribution py=p(0) y+/summationdisplay ℓγℓp(ℓ) y (29) from the Gaussian form /parenleftBigg \|y(ω)\|2/parenrightBigg4 where Pω(such that P0=/integraltext dωP ω) is the input power at frequency ω: p(0) x[x(ω)]∼exp/parenleftBigg −\|x(ω)\|2 P0ω/parenrightBigg (31) Note, that the correction ∆ Hy≥0 and equals to zero only when the distribution p(1) y= 0. Therefore, as follows from Eqns. (20),(28), in the second order in nonlinearity γthe mutual information Rhas the maximum, when p(1) y= 0, or, equivalently, when the output distribution is Gaussian up to the ﬁrstorder in nonlinearity. For a general nonlinear channel, that would correspond to the input distribution, being non-Gassian already in the ﬁrst order in γ. The corresponding correction can be ob- tained from Eq. (16), taken only up to the ﬁrst orded in nonlinearity: ∂ ∂γ/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay Dx(ω)p[y(ω)\|x(ω)]px[x(ω)]/bracketrightbigg/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle γ=0= 0(32) Generally, such an integral would yield px(x) = p(0) x(x)/parenleftBig 1 +γp(0) x(x)/parenrightBig , where p(0) xis Gaussian, and p(1) x/ne}ationslash= 0. However, it is straightforward to show, that for the ﬁber optics channel described by Eq. (10), a Gaussian input dis- tribution leads to non-Gaussian corrections in the output distribution starting only from the second order. There- fore, the requrement p(1) y= 0 is satisﬁed, when the input distribution is such that p(1) x= 0. For the channel capacity, deﬁned as the maximum value of the mutual information, we obtain: C=Wlog/parenleftbigg 1 +P0 PN/parenrightbigg −∆C1−∆C2+O/parenleftbig γ4/parenrightbig (33) The equation (33) yields the result for the ﬁber optics chan- nel capacity in the second order in the nonlinearity γ. In the next section we will discuss the physical origins of the corrections ∆ C1and ∆ C2. VI. The Discussion and the Conclusions In the spirit of the Shannon formula, the decrease of the capacity of a communication channel with a ﬁxed band- width can be attributed to (i) the eﬀective suppression of the signal power, and (ii) the enhancement of the noise. The corrections to the channel capacity, derived in the pre- vious section, can be interpreted as resulting precisely fr om these two eﬀects. The four-wave scattering[2], induced by the ﬁber non- linearity, inevitably leads to the processes, which gener- ate photons with the frequencies outside the channel band- width. Such photons, are not recorded by the “receiver”, and are lost for the purpose of the information transmis- sion. This corresponds to an eﬀective bandwidth power dissipation, and should therefore lead to a decrease of the channel capacity. Since for small nonlinearity this power loss ∆ P∼γ2, the dimension analysis implies 2 2/parenleftbigg2/parenrightbiggFig. 2 The corrections to the channel capacity, ∆C1and∆C2, in units of WN2γ2P2 0α−2, shown as functions of \|β2\|W2/αin the limit αd≫1,N≫1. The correction ∆C2is represented by the solid line, while ∆C1corresponds to the dashed line. Note, that ∆C1, which describes the effect of the power leakage from the bandwidth, is more strongly affected by the dispersion Such scattering processes are suppressed, when the scat- tering leads to a subsantial change of the total momen- tumδκ[ω1, ω2→ω3, ω], so that the corresponding scatter- ing rate S[ω1, ω2→ω3, ω]∼δ(ω1+ω2−ω3−ω) 1 + (δκ/κ 0)2(35) In the spirit of the uncertainty realtion, κ0∼1/Leﬀ, where Leﬀcorresponds to the length of the concentration of the power of the signal in the ﬁber. For a small absorption coeﬃcient α≪1/dthe distance Leﬀis of the order of the ﬁber length d, while in the opposite limit α≫1 the eﬀective length Leﬀ≈1/α. Using Eqn. (19), and the energy conservation ω3=ω1+ ω2−ω, the momentum change δκ[ω1, ω2→ω3, ω] can be expressed as δκ=β2(ω−ω1)(ω−ω1) (36) Substituting (36) into (35), for the channel capacity loss due to the bandwidth power “leakage”, in the limit P0≫ PN, and αd≫1, we obtain ∆CP∼W∆P P∼Wγ2P2 0 α2/integraldisplay Wdω1/integraldisplay Wdω2/integraldisplay Wdω3 ×/integraldisplay ω/∈Wdω S[ω1, ω2→ω3, ω] =Wγ2P2 0 α2/integraldisplay Wdω1/integraldisplay Wdω2/integraldisplay ω/∈Wdω ×1 1 + (β2/α)2(ω−ω1)2(ω−ω2)2(37)5 In Fig. 2 we plot the dependence of ∆ C1on the dimen- sionless parameter β2W2/α. Since momentum change δκ is proportional to β2, the increase of the dispersion leads to a strong suppression of the power leakage from the band- width window, and of the corresponding correction to the channel capacity. In a communication system with many “ﬁber-ampliﬁer” units, the ﬁber nonlinearity leads not only to the mixing of the signals at diﬀerent frequencies, but also to the mix- ing of the signal with the noise. Qualitatively, this would correspond to an eﬀective enhancement of the noise power in the system, and therefore to a loss of the channel capac- ity. This eﬀect is not present, when the system has only one “ﬁber-ampliﬁer” link, which explains the appearance of the ( N−1) factor in ∆ C2and ∆ C3. The eﬀective noise enhancement is caused by the scat- tering processes, which involve a “signal photon” and a photon, produced due to spontaneous emission in one of the ampliﬁers. The total power of this extra noise can be expressed as ∆PN P0∼γ2P0PN α2/integraldisplay Wdω1/integraldisplay Wdω2/integraldisplay Wdω3/integraldisplay Wdω ×S[ω1, ω2→ω3, ω] (38) The corresponding correction to the capacity ∆CN∼W∆PN PN∼Wγ2P2 0 α2/integraldisplay Wdω1/integraldisplay Wdω2/integraldisplay Wdω ×1 1 + (β2/α)2(ω−ω1)2(ω−ω2)2(39) where we assumed αd≫1. In this limit (39) is up to a constant factor identical to ∆ C2. The dependence of ∆ C2onβ2W2/αis also shown in Fig. 2. Note, that ∆ C2also decreases with the increase of the dispersion, but more slowly than ∆ C1. Since the scattering processes, which contribute to ∆ C1, need to “move” one of the frequencies out of the bandwidth window, they gener- ally involve a substantial change of the total momentum, and are therefore more strongly aﬀected by the dispersion. The two physical eﬀects, described above, determine the fundamental limit to the bit rate for a ﬁber optics commu- nication system. As follows from our analysis (see Fig. 2), the relative contributions of ∆ C1and ∆ C2, often referred to as the “four-wave mixing”, can be suppressed by choos- ing a ﬁber with a large dispersion, or when using a larger bandwidth. In our analysis, we treated the whole available band- width as a single channel. As a result, the cross- phase modulation[2], which severely limits the performanc e of advanced wavelength-division multiplexing systems[6] (WDM), does not aﬀect the channel capacity. The rea- son for this seemingly contradictory behaviour, is that in a WDM system, the “receiver”, tuned to a particular WDM channel, has no information on the signals at the other channels. Therefore, even in the absense of the “geniune” noise, the nonlinear interaction between diﬀerent channel s,be an eﬀective noise source, thus limiting the communica- tion rate. This limit however is not fundamental, and can be overcome by using the whole bandwidth all together. In conclusion, we developed a perturbative method for the calculation of the channel capacity for ﬁber optics com- munication systems. We obtained analytical expressions for the corrections to the Shannon formula due to ﬁber nonlinearity. We have shown that, compared to the Shan- non limit, the actual channel capacity is substantially sup - pressed by the photon scattering processes, caused by the ﬁber nonlinearity. Appendix I. Perturbative Solution of the Propagation Equation In this Appendix we describe the perturbative solutuion of the nonlinear equation (10) with the boundary condition A(0, t) =/integraldisplay dω x(ω)exp( iωt) (40) We represent A(z, t) as a power series A(z, t) =/integraldisplay dωexp/parenleftBig iωt−/bracketleftBigα 2+iκω/bracketrightBig z/parenrightBig∞/summationdisplay n=0γℓ × F ℓ(z, ω) (41) where κωis deﬁned is (19). Substituting (41) into Eqns. (10),(40), we obtain: (i) for ℓ= 0 ∂F0(z, ω) ∂z= 0 (42) F0(0, ω) = x(ω) (43) (ii) for ℓ/ne}ationslash= 0 ∂Fℓ(z, ω) ∂z=iℓ−1/summationdisplay ℓ1,ℓ2,ℓ3=1δℓ−1,ℓ1+ℓ2+ℓ3/integraldisplay dω1/integraldisplay dω2 × F ℓ1(z, ω1)Fℓ2(z, ω2)F∗ ℓ3(z, ω1+ω1−ω) ×exp [i(κω1+κω1−κω1+ω2−ω−κω)] (44) Fℓ(0, ω) = 0 (45) where δin the Kronekker’s delta-function. For any ℓ, these equations reduce to linear ﬁrst order diﬀerential equation, and can be solved straightforwardly . For example, the solutions for the ﬁrst three terms in the anzats (41) are given by: F0(z, ω) = x(ω) (46) F1(z, ω) =/integraldisplay dω1/integraldisplay dω2Fω ω1ω2x(ω1)x(ω2) ×x∗(ω1+ω2−ω) (47) F2(z, ω) =/integraldisplay dω1/integraldisplay dω2/integraldisplay dω3/integraldisplay d¯ω/bracketleftbig Gω ω1ω2ω3¯m ×x∗(ω1)x∗(ω2)x(ω1+ω2−¯ω)x(ω3) ×x(ω+ ¯ω−ω) +Hωx(ω)x(ω)x(ω)6 Here the functions F,GandHare given by Fω ω1ω2=i1−exp/parenleftbig −αd−iφω ω1ω2d/parenrightbig α+iφωω1ω2 Gm ω1ω2ω3¯ω=−/parenleftbig F¯ω ω1ω2/parenrightbig∗(Fω3 ω¯ω)∗ ×(1−exp(−αd+iφω3 ω¯ωd)) − F¯ω ω1ω2 1 F¯ω ω1ω2+1 Fω3 ω¯ω ∗ ×/parenleftbig 1−exp/parenleftbig −2αd+/parenleftbig φ¯ω ω1ω2+φω3 ω¯ω/parenrightbig d/parenrightbig/parenrightbig Hω ω1ω2ω3¯ω= 2/parenleftbig F¯ω ω1ω2/parenrightbig/parenleftbig Fm ¯ωω3/parenrightbig ×/parenleftbig 1−exp/parenleftbig −αd−iφω ¯ωω3d/parenrightbig/parenrightbig −2 F¯ω ω1ω2 1 F¯ω ω1ω2+1 Fω ¯ωω3 ∗ ×/parenleftbig 1−exp/parenleftbig −2αd−i/parenleftbig φ¯ω ¯ω1ω2+φω ¯ωω3/parenrightbig d/parenrightbig/parenrightbig where φω ω1ω2= (κω1+κω2−κω1+ω2−ω−κω) II. The Perturbative Calculation of the Channel Capacity In this Appendix, we describe the perturbative calcula- tion of the capacity of the simple nonlinear channel y(ω) =x(ω)exp( iγφ[x(ω)]) +n(ω) (49) Hereφ[x] is an arbitrary real function, and the noise n(ω) is a Gaussian random variable: pn[n(ω)]∼exp/bracketleftBigg −\|n(ω)\|2 PN/bracketrightBigg (50) The fact, that the noise in this model is additive, implies that the conditional distribution p(y\|x) is ﬁxed, and de- ﬁned by the noise distribution pn: p(y\|x) = pn[y−xexp (iγφ(x))] (51) It is therefore straightforward to show, that the entropy H[y\|x] does not depend on γ: H[y\|x] = −/integraldisplay dypn/parenleftBig y−xeiγφ(x)/parenrightBig ×log/bracketleftBig pn/parenleftBig y−xeiγφ(x)/parenrightBig/bracketrightBig =−/integraldisplay dzpn(z)log [pn(z)] = log [2 πePN] (52) In order to calculate the entropy H[y], we represent the output distribution as a power series in γ: /bracketleftBigg∞/summationdisplay/bracketrightBiggwhere p0 y(y) is the “unperturbed”, Gaussian distribution p0 y(y) =1 π(P0+PN)exp/parenleftBigg −\|y\|2 P0+PN/parenrightBigg (54) corresponding to the linear channel y=x+n. Substituting (53) into the deﬁnition of the entropy Hy, Eq. (5), we obtain: Hy= log [2 πe(P0+PN)]−1 2/integraldisplay p(1) y(y)2p0 y(y) +1 P0+PN/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay dy\|y\|2py(y) −/integraldisplay dy\|y\|2p0 y(y)/bracketrightbigg (55) The second term in Eq. (55), (1 /2)/integraltext p(1) y(y)2p0 y(y), repre- sents the diﬀerence of the output distribution from Gaus- sian, and corresponds to the contribution ∆ Hyin Eq. (20). Note, that in the second order in nonlinearity the devia- tions of the output distribution from Gaussian lead to a decrease of capacity. The third term, (1/(P0+PN))/bracketleftBig/integraltext dy\|y\|2py(y)−/integraltext dy\|y\|2p0 y(y)/bracketrightBig , is propor- tional to the change of the output power,/integraltext dy\|y\|2py(y), due to nonlinearity, and corresponds to ∆ C1in Eq. (20). Generally, the nonlinearity leads to energy exchange be- tween diﬀerent degrees of freedom in the channel (e.g. be- tween diﬀerent frequencies), and to the power leakage out of the bandwidth window. However, for the speciﬁc (nad non-generic) example, chosen in the present Appendix, this exchange is absent, since the output power /an}bracketle{t\|y\|2/an}bracketri}ht=/an}bracketle{t\|x\|2/an}bracketri}ht+/an}bracketle{t\|n\|2/an}bracketri}ht=P0+PN (56) does not depend on the nonlinearity. Substituting (56) in Eq. (55), and using Eq. (52), for the mutual information Rwe obtain: R= log/bracketleftbigg 1 +P0 PN/bracketrightbigg −1 2/integraldisplay p(1) y(y)2p0 y(y) (57) As immediately follows from Eq. (57), the channel capac- ity, equal to the maximum of the mutual information, is given by the Shannon formula (1), and is achieved when p(1) y(y) = 0 (58) The next step is to calculate the input distribution px(x) = p0 x(x)/bracketleftBigg 1 +∞/summationdisplay n=1p(n) x(x)/bracketrightBigg (59) corresponding to (58). The general relation between the input and the output distributions is deﬁned by the condi- tional distribution p(y\|x): /integraldisplay7 and, considered as an equation for p(x), is a Fredholm in- tergal equation of the ﬁrst kind. Note however, that since Eq. (58) represents not the whole output distribution, but only it’s ﬁrst order term p(1) y(y), we can expand Eq. (60) and keep only the terms up to the ﬁrst order in γ. We obtain: /integraldisplay dx p(y\|x)\|γ=0p0 x(x)p(1) x(x) +/integraldisplay dx∂ ∂γp(y\|x)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle γ=0p0 x(x) = 0, (61) Substituting here the conditional distribution from Eq. (51), we obtain: /integraldisplay dx p n(y−x)p0 x(x)p1(x) =i PN ×/integraldisplay dx p n(y−x)p0 x(x)φ(x) (x∗y−y∗x), (62) Using the identity ypn(y−x) =/parenleftbigg x+PN∂ ∂x∗/parenrightbigg pn(y−x),(63) and integrating by parts, we can represent the right hand side of (62) as follows: i/integraldisplay dx p n(y−x)p0 x(x)i PNφ(x) (x∗y−y∗x) = i/integraldisplay dx p n(y−x)p0 x(x)/parenleftbigg x∗∂φ(x) ∂x∗−x∂φ(x) ∂x/parenrightbigg (64) Therefore, as follows from Eqns. (62) and (64), the input distribution p(1) x(x) = i/parenleftbigg x∗∂φ(x) ∂x∗−x∂φ(x) ∂x/parenrightbigg (65) This procedure can be followed up for all orders in γ. By a direct calculation, it is straightforward to show, that th e channel capacity is represented by the Shannon result (1), which is achieved when for any n >1 /braceleftBigg p(n) x(x) = 0 p(n) y(y) = 0(66) Subsitituting (66) and (65) into Eq. (59), for the input distibution we ﬁnally obtain: px(x) =1 πP0/bracketleftbigg 1 +iγ/parenleftbigg x∗∂φ(x) ∂x∗−x∂φ(x) ∂x/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg ×exp/bracketleftBigg −\|x\|2 P0/bracketrightBigg (67) with the corresponding channel capacity /bracketleftbigg/bracketrightbiggThis result has a simple physical meaning. When the in- put distribution is organized in such a way, that the quan- tityz=xexp (iγφ(x)) has the Gaussian distribution, then, considering zas input, the communication channel be- comes linear: y=z+n, and the channel capacity is there- fore given by the Shannon formula (1),(68). The corre- sponding input distribution is then deﬁned by the Jacobian of the transformation from x≡xR+ixItoz≡zR+izI, ∂(zR, zI)/∂(xR, xI) (note, that xR,xI,zR,zIare deﬁned asrealvariables): px(x) =1 πP0∂(zR, zI) ∂(xR, xI)exp/bracketleftBigg −/vextendsingle/vextendsinglex2 R+x2 I/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 P0/bracketrightBigg (69) which reduces to the distribution (67), since ∂(zR, zI) ∂(xR, xI)= 1 + γxR∂φ(xR, xI) ∂xI−γxI∂φ(xR, xI) ∂xR ≡1 +iγx∗∂φ(x, x∗) ∂x∗−iγx∂φ(x, x∗) ∂x(70) This result should be contrasted to the so called “Gaus- sian estimate” of the channel capacity[7]. In the latter appoach, the information channel is described by the joint Gaussian distribution P(xω, yω)∼exp/parenleftbigg −[x∗ ωy∗ ω]A/bracketleftbiggxω yω/bracketrightbigg/parenrightbigg (71) where A=/bracketleftbigg /an}bracketle{tx∗ ωxω/an}bracketri}ht /an}bracketle{tx∗ ωyω/an}bracketri}ht /an}bracketle{ty∗ ωxω/an}bracketri}ht /an}bracketle{ty∗ ωyω/an}bracketri}ht/bracketrightbigg−1 (72) The channel capacity is then estimated as the mutual in- formation, corresponding to the distribution (71): CG=/integraldisplay dωlog/bracketleftbigg/an}bracketle{tx∗ ωxω/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{ty∗ ωyω/an}bracketri}ht /an}bracketle{tx∗ωxω/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{ty∗ωyω/an}bracketri}ht − /an}bracketle{tx∗ωyω/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{ty∗ωxω/an}bracketri}ht/bracketrightbigg (73) Under the constraint of the ﬁxed input power/integraltext dω/an}bracketle{t\|xω\|2/an}bracketri}ht, the estimate (73) was shown[7] to give the low bound to the channel capacity. For the model channel considered in the present Ap- pendix, the “Gaussian estimate” yields an expression, dif- ferent from the Shannon result. For example, when φ(x) = \|x\|2, we obtain CG=−Wlog/bracketleftBigg 1−P0 (P0+PN)(1 + γ2P2 0)2/bracketrightBigg =Wlog/bracketleftbigg 1 +P0 PN/bracketrightbigg −2Wγ2P2 0P0 PN+O/parenleftbig γ4/parenrightbig (74) which, as expected, is smaller that the actual channel ca- pacity (68). Note, that the diﬀerence between the exact channel capacity and the Gaussian estimate δC≡C−CG=Wlog/bracketleftBigg 1 +P0 PN/parenleftBigg 1−1 (1 +γ2P2 0)2/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg /parenleftbig /parenrightbig8 is not merely a constant scale factor, but a nontrivial func- tion of the signal to noise ratio, and the nonlinerity. Even when the input distribution is Gaussian , like e.g. when the phase φdepends on xvia the “power” \|x\|2, the Gaussian Estimate does not yield the exact result. The reason for this behaviour is that the joint Gaussian distri- bution does not correctly reproduce the conditional distri- bution p(y\|x). For an essentially noinlinear system (e.g. a ﬁber op- tics communication channel), there is generally very littl e apriori knowledge about the parametric dependence of the Channel Capacity on the signal to noise ratio and other system parameters. In this case, the Gaussian Estimate for the channel capacity can be (should be?) viewed as a very unreliable method, as there is no way to separate it’s artefacts from the actual behaviour of the channel capacity . References [1] C. E. Shannon, A Mathematical Theory of Communication . The Bell System Technical Journal vol 27, pp. 379 - 423, 623-656. 1948. [2] G.P.Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics , Academic Press, San Diego, 1995. [3] R.K.Dodd, J.C.Eilbeck, J.D.Gibbon, and H.C.Morris, Solitons and Nonlinear Wave Equations , Academic Press, New York, 1984. [4] G. L. Lamb, Jr., Elements of Soliton Theory , Wiley, New York, 1980. [5] J. P. Gordon and L. F. Mollenauer, Phase noise in photonic com- munication systems using linear ampliﬁers . Optics Letters, vol. 23, pp. 1351-1353. Dec. 1990. [6] G. P. Agrawal, Fiber-Optic Communication Systems , John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997. [7] I. Teletar, unpublished.
arXiv:physics/0007034v1 [physics.bio-ph] 12 Jul 2000Theoretical Prevision of Physical-Chemical Properties of Amino Acids from Genetic Code L. Frappata, A. Sciarrinob, P. Sorbaa aLaboratoire d’Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique Th´ eorique LAP TH CNRS, UMR 5108, associ´ ee ` a l’Universit´ e de Savoie BP 110, F-74941 Annecy-le-Vieux Cedex, France bDipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Universit` a di Napoli “Fe derico II” and I.N.F.N., Sezione di Napoli Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia, I-8 0126 Napoli, Italy Abstract Using the crystal basis model of the genetic code, a set of rel ations between the physical-chemical properties of the amino acids are derive d and compared with the ex- perimental data. A prevision for the not yet measured thermo dynamical parameters of three amino acids is done. LAPTH-805/00 DSF-TH-24/00 physics/0007034 July 20001 Introduction It is a known observation [1] that a relationship exists betw een the codons and the physical- chemical properties (PCP) of the coded amino acids (a.a.). T he observed pattern is read either as a relic of some kind of interaction between the a.a. and the nucleotides at an early stage of evolution or as the existence of a mechanism relating the pro perties of codons with those of a.a.. In particular it is observed that the relationship depends e ssentially on the nature of the second nucleotide in the codons and it holds when the second nucleot ide is adenine (A), uracil (U) or cytosine (C), not when it is guanine (G). To our knowledge nei ther the anomalous behaviour of G nor the existence of a closest relationship between some of the a.a. is understood. It is the aim of this paper to provide an explanation of both these fact s in the framework of the model of genetic code we have discussed in a previous paper [2], cal led crystal basis model, as it is heavily based on the mathematical structure of the modules o f the irreducible representations (IR) of Uq→0[sl(2)⊕sl(2)], known in the mathematical literature as crystal basis [3]. After recalling brieﬂy the model in Sect. 2, we derive in Sect. 3 a se t of relations between the PCP of the amino acids, based on the content of the IRs of the dinucle otides and of the codons coding for the amino acids. Finally we compare our predictions with the experimental data. 2 The Model The four nucleotides A, C, G, U are considered as basic states of the (1 2,1 2) irreducible rep- resentation of the quantum enveloping algebra Uq[sl(2)⊕sl(2)] in the limit q→0, with the following assignment of quantum numbers: C≡(+1 2,+1 2) U ≡(−1 2,+1 2) G ≡(+1 2,−1 2) A ≡(−1 2,−1 2) (1) In this framework, the codons are built as composite states o f the nucleotide states by tensoring three such (1 2,1 2) representations. Note that the crystal basis, which exist s in the limit q→0 of the q-deformed universal enveloping algebra Uq(G) for any semi-simple Lie algebra G, is the only way to provide such composite states as purestates, and to ensure the existence of an order in the tensoring procedure. However, it is well-known (see Table 1) that in a multiplet of codons relative to a speciﬁc amino acid, the ﬁrst two bases constituent of a codon are “rel atively stable”, the degeneracy being mainly generated by the third nucleotide. Considerin g the tensor product (1 2,1 2)⊗(1 2,1 2) = (1 ,1)⊕(1,0)⊕(0,1)⊕(0,0) (2) we get, using Kashiwara’s theorem [3], the following tablea u: →sl(2)H (0,0) (CA) (1 ,0) ( CG UG UA ) ↓ sl(2)V (0,1) CU GU GA  (1,1) CC UC UU GC AC AU GG AG AA  1where the subscripts H(:= horizontal) and V(:= vertical) specify the two sl(2). From Table 1, the dinucleotide states formed by the ﬁrst two n ucleotides in a codon can be put in correspondence with quadruplets, doublets or sing lets of codons relative to an amino acid, the sextets (resp. triplets) being viewed as the sum of a quadruplet and a doublet (resp. a doublet and a singlet). We deﬁne in our model the “charge” Qof a dinucleotide state by Q=J3,H+1 4CV(J3,V+ 1)−1 4(3) The dinucleotide states are then split into two octets with r espect to the charge Q: the eight strong dinucleotides CC, GC, CG, GG, CU, GU, UC, AC associated to the quadruplets (as well as those included in the sextets) of codons satisfy Q >0, while the eight weak dinucleotides AA, AU, UA, UU, UG, AG, CA, GA associated to the doublets (as we ll as those included in the triplets) and eventually to the singlets of codons satis fyQ <0. Let us remark that by the change C ↔A and U ↔G, which is equivalent to the change of the sign of J3,αor to reﬂexion with respect to the diagonals of the eq. (1), the 8 strong dinu cleotides are transformed into weak ones and vice-versa. Note that a ﬁrst attempt to diﬀeren tiate between strong and weak dinucleotides is contained in ref. [4]. The irreducible representations of the tensor product of (1 2,1 2)⊗3as well as the correspon- dence codons/amino acids for the eukariotic code is reporte d in Table 1. The upper labels denote diﬀerent IRs. 3 Relationship between the PCP of Amino Acids We assume that some PCP of a given amino acid are related to the nature of the codons, in particular they depend on the following mathematical featu res, written in hierarchical order: 1. the IR of the dinucleotide formed by the ﬁrst two nucleotid es; 2. the sign of the charge Q, eq. (3), on the dinucleotide state; 3. the value of the third component of J3,Vinside a ﬁxed IR for the dinucleotides; 4. the upper label(s) of the codon IR(s); Not all the PCP are supposed to follow the scheme above; some o f them are essentially given by the speciﬁc chemical structure of the amino acid itself. In the following, we analyze the PCP of the amino acids in the l ight of the dinucleotide content of the irreducible representations of eq. (2). – representation (0,0) The codons of the form CAN (N = C, U, G, A) all belong to the IR (1 2,1 2)4and code for His andGln, both being coded by doublets and diﬀering by the value of J3,V. Then we expect that the PCP of HisandGlnare very close. 2– representation (1,0) We analyse now the codons built up by the dinucleotide IR (1 ,0). i.e. CG ( Q > 0), UG, UA (both Q <0). The codons CGS (S = C, G), resp. CGW (W = U, A), belonging to I R (3/2,1/2)2, resp. (1 /2,1/2)2, all code for Arg, so we do not have any relation. The codons UGS, resp. UGW, belonging to IR (3 /2,1/2)2, resp. (1 /2,1/2)2, code for Cys(which is a doublet) andTrp(singlet), resp. the other CysandTer(triplets). So we expect the PCP of Cysnot very diﬀerent from those of Trp. The codons UAN, belonging to the IR (3 /2,1/2)2, code for theTyrandTer. So we expect some aﬃnity between the a.a. coded by UGN and UAN , in particular between CysandTyrboth being coded by doublets. – representation (0,1) The codons built up by the dinucleotide IR (0 ,1) are CU, GU (both Q >0) and GA ( Q <0). The codons CUY and GUY (Y = C, U), resp. CUR and GUR (R = G, A), bel onging to IR (1/2,3/2)2, resp. (1 /2,1/2)3, code for LeuandVal. Therefore we do not have any relation between a.a. coded by the same dinucleotide, but we expect th at the PCP of LeuandValare close since CU and GU both belong to the same IR and are both str ong. The codons GAN belong to the IR (1 /2,3/2)2and they code AspandGlu(both doublets). Then we expect the PCP of Asp and Glu to be very close. – representation (1,1) The dinucleotide IR (1 ,1) contains ﬁve states with Q >0 (CC, UC, GC, AC, GG). The codons CCN , resp. UCN, belong to four diﬀerent IRs and code for Pro(quartet), resp. Ser(sextets). We expect an aﬃnity between the PCP of these a.a.. The codons G CN , resp. ACN, belong to four diﬀerent IRs and code for Ala(quartet), resp. Thr(quartets). We expect a strong aﬃnity between the PCP of AlaandThr. The codons GGN belong to two diﬀerent IRs and code for Gly, so we expect an aﬃnity of PCP of Glywith those of Pro,Ser,Ala,Thr. Now let us look at the four states with Q <0 (UU, AU, AG, AA). The codons UUN belong to two diﬀerent IRs and code for Leu, the doublet subpart of the sextet, and for Phe(doublet). An aﬃnity is expected between the PCP of these two a.a.. The codons AUN b elong to two diﬀerent IRs and code Ile(triplet) and Met(singlet) and, in fact, the values of PCP of these two a.a. are not very diﬀerent. The codons AGN belong to two diﬀerent IRs a nd code for SerandArg, the doublet subpart of the sextet, so an aﬃnity between the PCP of these codons is expected. The codons AAN belong to the same IR (3 /2,3/2) and code for AsnandLys, so the values of the PCP of these a.a. should be close. Note that for the three sextets ( Arg,Leu,Ser) the quartet (doublet) subpart is coded by a codon with a strong (weak) dinucleotide. In conclusion we predict the following relations between th e values of the PCP of the amino acids (∼=means strong aﬃnity, ≈aﬃnity, ∼weak aﬃnity): 1. His ∼=Gln 2. Asp ∼=Glu 33. Asn ∼=Lys∼Arg, Ser 4. Cys ∼=Tyr≈Trp 5. Leu ∼=Val 6. Pro ∼=Ser≈Gly 7. Ala ∼=Thr≈Gly, Pro, Ser 8. Ile∼=Met≈Phe 4 Discussion We have compared our theoretical previsions with 10 physica l-chemical properties: 1. the Chou-Fasman conformational parameters [5] Pα,PβandPτwhich gives a measure of the probability of the a.a. to form respectively a helix, a sh eet and a turn. However it has been suggested in [6] that the sum Pα+Pβis a more appropriate parameter to characterize the generic structure forming potential while the diﬀerenc ePα−Pβis a more appropriate parameter for the helix forming potential, which is a quanti ty more depending on the particular a.a.. So we compare with Pα+PβandPτ; 2. the Grantham polarity PG[7]; 3. the relative hydrophilicity Rfas computed by Weber and Lacey [8]; 4. the thermodynamic activation parameters at 298 K: ∆ H(enthalpy, in kJ/mol), ∆ G (free energy, in kJ/mol) and ∆ S(entropy, in J/mole/K) as obtained by Siemion and Stefanowicz [9]; 5. the negative of the logarithm of the dissociation constan ts at 298 K: pKafor the α-COOH group and pKbfor the α-NH+ 3group [10]; 6. the isoelectronic point pI[10], i.e. the pHvalue at which no electrophoresis occurs. The comparison between the theoretical relations and the ex perimental values shows (see Tables 2 and 4): 1. His ∼=Gln – The agreement, except for pI, is very good. 2. Asp ∼=Glu – The agreement, except for Pτ, is very good. 3. Asn ∼=Lys∼Arg, Ser – The agreement, except for pIandPτis very good. The comparison with the values of PCP of Ser and Arg is satisfactory. 44. Cys ∼=Tyr≈Trp – Except for Rf, the agreement between the ﬁrst two a.a. is very good, while with Trp is satisfactory. 5. Leu ∼=Val – The agreement is very good. 6. Pro ∼=Ser≈Gly – The agreement is very good, except for Pα+Pβand ∆ H, and with Gly more than satisfactory. 7. Ala ∼=Thr≈Gly, Pro, Ser – The agreement is very good between the ﬁrst two a.a. except forPτand satisfactory with the others except for the conformatio nal parameters. 8. Ile∼=Met≈Phe – The agreement is very good between the ﬁrst two a.a. and s atisfactory with Phe. In order to have a more quantitative evaluation of the agreem ent between the data and the the- oretical model we compute the mean value and the standard dev iation of the whole population (i.e. the twenty amino-acids) for each generic PCP x x=1 nn/summationdisplay ixiand σx=/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt1 nn/summationdisplay i(xi−x)2 (4) in 3 diﬀerent cases: 1. considering all the amino acids, i.e. summing over the who le set of amino acids ( n= 20); 2. considering the amino acids coded by the codons with the sa me second nucleotide ( n= 4 for C, n= 5 for U and G, n= 7 for A); 3. considering the couples ( n= 2) of amino acids given by our 8 relations. The results are reported in Tables 2 to 4. As an estimate of the accurary of our predictions, we compute the sum of the adimensional quantities given for any PCP by the ratios σx/xof the standard deviation to the average value, in the three diﬀerent cases considered above. all 1.82 A 1.82 C 1.13 G 1.82 U 0.70 Gln/His Asp/Glu Asn/Lys Cys/Tyr Pro/Ser Ala/Thr Ile/Met Leu/Val 0.35 0.63 0.72 0.80 0.77 0.48 0.39 0.38 Values of η=/summationtextσx/x Looking to the table above, we remark that the characterizat ion of the PCP from the nature of the second nucleotide in the codons is, except for U, indeed n ot really discriminatory. On the contrary, the relations derived by our model reduces dramat ically the values of our estimate parameter η=/summationtext iσx/x. 5From Table 2 we note that the values of the thermodynamical qu antities for some amino acids are not yet measured. Our relations predict that the va lues of ∆ Hand−∆SforHis should be around 60 kJ/mol and 120 kJ/mol/K. For the values of AspandGlucoded by the unique weak nucleotide GA in the IR (0,1), we do not have any av ailable data to compare with. However, making the further assumption, supported by an ins pection of the available data, that the values of the thermodynamical quantities depend slight ly on the nature of the charge, we predict that the values of these quantities for AspandGlushould not be very dissimilar from the values of the analogous quantities for LeuandVal, coded by the strong dinucleotide CU an GU in the IR (0,1). So we predict that for AspandGlu, one should ﬁnd ∆ H≈60 kJ/mol, −∆S≈135 kJ/mol/K and ∆ G≈100 kJ/mol. 5 Conlusion In conclusion, the values of PCP show, with a few exceptions, a pattern of correlations which is expected from the assumptions done in the crystal basis mo del. Let us emphasize that the assignment of the value of the IRs both for the dinucleotide a nd for the trinucleotide states or codons is a straightforward consequence of our model. The re marked property that the a.a. coded by codons whose second nucleotide is G do not share simi larity in the properties of PCP with other a.a. does ﬁnd an explication in the model as it is im mediate to verify, looking to the table of the tensor product of two (1 2,1 2) that that are no two states with G in second position which share simultaneously the properties of belonging to t he same IR and being characterized by the same value of Q. A ﬁnal remark: it has beeen sugested that the physico-chemic al properties of the amino acids have played a fundamental role in the evolution and the organization of the genetic code. In this framework, a meaure of the relative distances betwee n amino acids has been deﬁned, see [11] and references therein. The picture which emerges in [1 1] has some striking conﬁrmations with the predictions of our model. So we argue that the assign ment of codons in multiplets, corresponding to irreducible representations, may have a d eep connection with the evolutionary organization. Acknowledgments: We are grateful to M.L. Chiusano for pointing us the interest to analyse the physical-chemical properties in the light of th e crystal basis model and for providing us literature on the subject. Partially supported by MURST ( Italy) and MAE (France) in the framework of french-italian collaboration Galileo. References [1] M. Sjostrom, S. Wold, A Multivariate Study of the Relationship Between the Geneti c Code and the Physical-Chemical Properties of Amino Acids, J. Mol. Evol. 22(1985) 272. 6[2] L. Frappat, A. Sciarrino, P. Sorba, A crystal base for the genetic code, Phys. Lett. A 250 (1998) 214. [3] M. Kashiwara, Crystalizing the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 133(1990) 249. [4] B.G. Konopel’chenko, Yu.B. Rumer, Classiﬁcation of Codons in the Genetic Code, Trans- lated from Doklady Akademi Nauk SSSR 223, N.2, (1975) 471. [5] P.Y. Chou, G.D. Fasman, Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, β-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins, Biochemistry 13(1974) 211. [6] I.Z. Siemion, P.J. Siemion, The informational context of the third base in amino acid codons, BioSystems 33(1994) 139. [7] R. Grantham, Amino acid diﬀerence formula to help explain protein evolut ion,Science 185(1974) 862. [8] A.L. Weber, J.C. Lacey, Genetic Code Correlations: Amino Acids and Their Anticodon Nucleotides , J. Mol. Evol. 11(1978) 199. [9] I.Z. Siemion, P. Stefanowicz Periodical change of amino acid reactivity within the genet ic code , BioSystems 27(1992) 77. [10] D.R. Lide Ed., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 73rd ed. , CRC Press (Boca Raton, Florida, USA 1992). [11] M. Di Giulio, Some aspects of the organization and evolution of the geneti c code, J. Mol. Evol.29(1989) 191. 7Table 1: The eukariotic code. The upper label denotes diﬀere nt irreducible representations. codon a.a. JH JVcodon a.a. JH JV CCC Pro 3/2 3/2 UCC Ser 3/2 3/2 CCU Pro (1/2 3/2)1UCU Ser (1/2 3/2)1 CCG Pro (3/2 1/2)1UCG Ser (3/2 1/2)1 CCA Pro (1/2 1/2)1UCA Ser (1/2 1/2)1 CUC Leu (1/2 3/2)2UUC Phe 3/2 3/2 CUU Leu (1/2 3/2)2UUU Phe 3/2 3/2 CUG Leu (1/2 1/2)3UUG Leu (3/2 1/2)1 CUA Leu (1/2 1/2)3UUA Leu (3/2 1/2)1 CGC Arg (3/2 1/2)2UGC Cys (3/2 1/2)2 CGU Arg (1/2 1/2)2UGU Cys (1/2 1/2)2 CGG Arg (3/2 1/2)2UGG Trp (3/2 1/2)2 CGA Arg (1/2 1/2)2UGA Ter (1/2 1/2)2 CAC His (1/2 1/2)4UAC Tyr (3/2 1/2)2 CAU His (1/2 1/2)4UAU Tyr (3/2 1/2)2 CAG Gln (1/2 1/2)4UAG Ter (3/2 1/2)2 CAA Gln (1/2 1/2)4UAA Ter (3/2 1/2)2 GCC Ala 3/2 3/2 ACC Thr 3/2 3/2 GCU Ala (1/2 3/2)1ACU Thr (1/2 3/2)1 GCG Ala (3/2 1/2)1ACG Thr (3/2 1/2)1 GCA Ala (1/2 1/2)1ACA Thr (1/2 1/2)1 GUC Val (1/2 3/2)2AUC Ile 3/2 3/2 GUU Val (1/2 3/2)2AUU Ile 3/2 3/2 GUG Val (1/2 1/2)3AUG Met (3/2 1/2)1 GUA Val (1/2 1/2)3AUA Ile (3/2 1/2)1 GGC Gly 3/2 3/2 AGC Ser 3/2 3/2 GGU Gly (1/2 3/2)1AGU Ser (1/2 3/2)1 GGG Gly 3/2 3/2 AGG Arg 3/2 3/2 GGA Gly (1/2 3/2)1AGA Arg (1/2 3/2)1 GAC Asp (1/2 3/2)2AAC Asn 3/2 3/2 GAU Asp (1/2 3/2)2AAU Asn 3/2 3/2 GAG Glu (1/2 3/2)2AAG Lys 3/2 3/2 GAA Glu (1/2 3/2)2AAA Lys 3/2 3/2 8Amino acid Pα+PβPτ PG Rf∆H−∆S∆GpKapKbpI Ala 2.25 0.66 8.09 0.89 50.7 147.8 94.66 2.34 9.69 6.00 Arg 1.91 0.95 10.50 0.88 54.8 143.2 97.5 2.17 9.04 11.15 Asn 1.60 1.56 11.5 0.89 55 135.8 95.51 2.02 8.80 5.41 Asp 1.55 1.46 13 0.87 − − − 1.88 9.60 2.77 Cys 1.89 1.19 5.5 0.85 43.9 163.2 92.89 1.96 10.28 5.02 Gln 2.21 0.98 10.5 0.82 61.1 121.8 97.30 2.17 9.13 5.65 Glu 1.88 0.74 12.2 0.84 − − − 2.19 9.67 3.22 Gly 1.32 1.56 9 0.92 49.0 140.6 91.08 2.34 9.60 5.97 His 1.87 0.95 10.4 0.83 − − 94.59 1.82 9.17 7.47 Ile 2.68 0.47 5.2 0.76 57.3 152.3 102.6 2.36 9.60 5.94 Leu 2.51 0.59 4.9 0.73 59.4 128.1 97.70 2.36 9.60 5.98 Lys 1.90 1.01 11.3 0.97 57.8 135.6 98.16 2.18 8.95 9.59 Met 2.50 0.60 5.7 0.74 58.2 128.5 96.65 2.28 9.21 5.74 Phe 2.51 0.60 5.2 0.52 48.3 156.1 94.76 1.83 9.13 5.48 Pro 1.12 1.52 8 0.82 50.7 164.5 99.49 1.99 10.60 6.30 Ser 1.52 1.43 9.19 0.96 36.0 180 89.98 2.21 9.15 5.68 Thr 2.02 0.96 8.59 0.92 53.4 136.0 93.98 2.09 9.10 5.64 Trp 2.45 0.96 5.4 0.2 51.1 151.5 96.25 2.83 9.39 5.89 Tyr 2.16 1.14 6.2 0.49 54.4 139.0 95.68 2.20 9.11 5.66 Val 2.76 0.50 5.9 0.85 60.2 139.0 101.7 2.32 9.62 5.96 x 2.03 0.99 8.31 0.79 53.02 144.88 96.14 2.18 9.42 6.03 σx 0.45 0.36 2.61 0.18 6.23 15.57 3.16 0.23 0.43 1.76 σx/x 22 % 36 % 31 % 23 % 12 % 10 % 3 % 10 % 5 % 29 % Table 2: Table of amino-acid properties Pα+PβPτ PG Rf∆H−∆S∆GpKapKbpI x 1.88 1.12 10.73 0.82 57.08 133.05 96.25 2.07 9.20 5.68 A σx 0.23 0.27 2.03 0.14 2.65 6.63 1.29 0.15 0.30 2.17 σx/x 12 % 24 % 19 % 17 % 5 % 5 % 1 % 7 % 3 % 38 % x 1.73 1.14 8.47 0.90 47.70 157.08 94.53 2.16 9.64 5.90 C σx 0.44 0.35 0.47 0.05 6.84 16.66 3.38 0.13 0.60 0.28 σx/x 25 % 31 % 6 % 6 % 14 % 11 % 4 % 6 % 6 % 5 % x 1.82 1.22 7.92 0.76 46.96 155.70 93.54 2.30 9.49 6.74 G σx 0.39 0.25 2.08 0.28 6.52 14.48 2.90 0.29 0.44 2.23 σx/x 21 % 20 % 26 % 37 % 14 % 9 % 3 % 13 % 5 % 33 % x 2.59 0.55 5.38 0.72 56.68 140.80 98.68 2.23 9.43 5.82 U σx 0.11 0.06 0.37 0.11 4.31 11.68 3.00 0.20 0.22 0.19 σx/x 4 % 10 % 7 % 15 % 8 % 8 % 3 % 9 % 2 % 3 % Table 3: PCP of amino-acids coded by codons with same second n ucleotide (written at the left) 9Pα+PβPτ PG Rf∆H−∆S∆GpKapKbpI x 2.04 0.97 10.45 0.83 61.10 121.80 95.95 2.00 9.15 6.56 Gln/His σx 0.17 0.01 0.05 0.01 − − 1.36 0.17 0.02 0.91 σx/x 8 % 2 % 0 % 1 % − − 1 % 9 % 0 % 14 % x 1.72 1.10 12.60 0.86 2.04 9.64 3.00 Asp/Glu σx 0.17 0.36 0.40 0.02 0.16 0.04 0.22 σx/x 10 % 33 % 3 % 2 % 8 % 0 % 8 % x 1.75 1.29 11.40 0.93 56.40 135.70 96.84 2.10 8.88 7.50 Asn/Lys σx 0.15 0.28 0.10 0.04 1.40 0.10 1.32 0.08 0.08 2.09 σx/x 9 % 21 % 1 % 4 % 2 % 0 % 1 % 4 % 1 % 28 % x 2.03 1.17 5.85 0.67 49.15 151.10 94.29 2.08 9.70 5.34 Cys/Tyr σx 0.14 0.02 0.35 0.18 5.25 12.10 1.40 0.12 0.58 0.32 σx/x 7 % 2 % 6 % 27 % 11 % 8 % 1 % 6 % 6 % 6 % x 1.32 1.48 8.60 0.89 43.35 172.25 94.74 2.10 9.88 5.99 Pro/Ser σx 0.20 0.04 0.60 0.07 7.35 7.75 4.76 0.11 0.73 0.31 σx/x 15 % 3 % 7 % 8 % 17 % 4 % 5 % 5 % 7 % 5 % x 2.14 0.81 8.34 0.91 52.05 141.9 94.32 2.22 9.40 5.82 Ala/Thr σx 0.12 0.15 0.25 0.02 1.35 5.90 0.34 0.13 0.29 0.18 σx/x 5 % 19 % 3 % 2 % 3 % 4 % 0 % 6 % 3 % 3 % x 2.59 0.54 5.45 0.75 57.75 140.40 99.63 2.32 9.41 5.84 Ile/Met σx 0.09 0.07 0.25 0.01 0.45 11.90 2.97 0.04 0.19 0.10 σx/x 3 % 12 % 5 % 1 % 1 % 8 % 3 % 2 % 2 % 2 % x 2.64 0.55 5.40 0.79 59.80 133.55 99.70 2.34 9.61 5.97 Leu/Val σx 0.12 0.05 0.50 0.06 0.40 5.45 2.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 σx/x 5 % 8 % 9 % 8 % 1 % 4 % 2 % 1 % 0 % 0 % Table 4: Table of amino-acid doublet properties 10
Temperature of the SN1987A Supernova Provides an Estimate of the Electron Neutrino Mass* by John Michael Williams P. O. Box 2697, Redwood City, CA 94064 jwill@pacbell.net Copyright (c) 2000, by John Michael Williams All Rights Reserved * Posted at the American Physical Society eprint site as aps1999jan31_001J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 1 Abstract Numerous upper bounds on the (anti)neutrino rest mass have been published based on the SN1987A observations. Here, we use a nonkinematic (thermal) time extent to provide a rest-mass estimate of a few eV (as mc2 energy), if not zero. In the solution, we find that a typical upper-bound formula f or the mass implies that this thermal extent was attributable to about 10% of the pa rticle energy measured on Earth. The present approach yields an expected value for the mass, given any theoretical or model-dependent estimate of the fraction of the detect ed neutrino energy attributable to the supernova temperature.J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 2 I. Introduction The theoretical proposal of the neutrino particle in 1930, by Pauli, was followed by the experimental demonstration of the existence of the electron n eutrino in 1953 by Reines. At the time, it was assumed that, like the ph oton, the electron neutrino likely would have a rest mass of zero [1]. The current Stan dard Model of elementary particles postulates massless neutrinos [2]; however , many theorists in astrophysics and particle physics believe that all the lep tons, including the neutrinos, should be massive [32; 3-5]. At 5 eVc2, the rest mass would be about 105− that of an electron; this doesn’t seem unreasonable, although it certainly is not proven either by the current paper or any previous work. The temporal interval of an observed particle stream from a di stant event may be analyzed into three components: (1) The creation interval of the primitive event, (2) the dispersion interval of the particle creation kinematics ( here called the energy extent ), and (3) the dispersion interval because of the temperature during creation (here called the thermal extent ). The total time interval at the detector is the detection interval . In the case of supernova neutrinos, the center of mass moti on of the primitive region, assumed very subluminal relative to Ea rth, would not affect any of the time intervals measurably; and, no supernova proc ess would be expected to reduce the times, under the First and Second Laws of thermody namics, unless by rare chance, a possibility we here ignore.J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 3 If the electron (anti)neutrino had zero mass, the transit f rom a supernova to Earth would be assumed to have been at the exact speed of light in a vacuum, making the detection interval always equal to the creation in terval and the other components zero; however, a neutrino with nonzero rest mass may n ot be allowed the speed of light. II. The 1987 Supernova Burst The Kamiokande II and Irvine-Michigan-Brookhaven (IMB) neut rino detectors were designed to study proton decay and Solar neutrino flux. Both were operating in February of 1987, when the SN1987A supernova event occurred in the Greater Magellanic Cloud at a distance of about 50,000 parsecs. The star causing this supernova has been identified and was catalogued as a blue g iant of about 15 Solar masses before the supernova [6]. The Kamiokande II data, wi th inferred neutrino energies accurate to about 20% [7], are plotted in Fig. 1; t he IMB data were similar but show fewer neutrinos over a shorter time interval.J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 4 SN1987A Neutrino Burst at Kamiokande II 01020304050 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 Relative Arrival Time (s)Neutrino Energy (MeV) FIG. 1. Antineutrino energy at the detector , assuming the Cerenkov light represented antineutrino+proton → positron+neutron interactions. Data after Hirata et al [ 8, Table 1]. The square symbol represents the one likely detect or background event. Looking at Fig. 1, the maximum detection interval possible w ould seem to be about 15 seconds. The period up to about 2 seconds also migh t be considered the detection interval for a distinct subevent. III. Thermal Extent yields an Estimate of the Mass A. Neutrino thermal velocity component Let us assume the neutrino to have nonzero rest mass. Also, l et us assume ( a) that a gas of boron 8B atoms ( b) at approximately 109 K [9] was the primitive substance for the neutrinos detected.J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 5 Consider the effect of an error in assumption ( a): Primitives, say, atoms or stripped nuclei, heavier than 8B boron, such as 28Si or 56Fe, would reduce the thermal velocity estimate (to be given below) by no more than a factor of three; for all else the same, this would require slightly more massive n eutrinos to account for the observed detector energies. But, because the creation interva l would include any subsequent weak-force diffusion period, the kinetic tempera ture probably should reflect a primitive lighter than these heavy-element fu sion products. So, we will accept 8B as the primitive substance somewhat arbitrarily and wi thout further consideration of error. We accept assumption ( b) as reasonable and will comment on a range of temperatures later. The thermal extent by definition is meant to ignore all kinema tic energy differences [10] and to sidestep complexities [4, 9, 11-13] of state during the creation interval; these factors will be seen later to be described in t he energy, not thermal, extent of the observations. The observed neutrinos being assumed massive, the primitive th ermal motion would add a random component to the velocity of the neutrino as measured in the inertial frame of the detector on Earth. We estimate this vel ocity dispersion by equating the primitive kinetic and thermal energy as 1 23 22m k Tp p B pυ=, (1) in which mp and υp respectively represent the rest mass and rms average thermal speed of a primitive element during creation of the detected neutr ino, kB isJ. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 6 Boltzmann’s constant, and Tp is the Kelvin temperature in the primitive region of the supernova. Solving for υp, which we shall use to define the average inertial frame of t he detected neutrino particles, we get υpB ppk mT=3 . (2) The rest mass of 8B would be a little over 8 times that of the proton, making mp about 15 1026.⋅− kg. Assuming Tp to be somewhat over 109 K, a rough estimate of the speed from eq. (2) would be υp≅ ⋅3 106 m/s ≅ 0.01 c. For simplicity, we accept this average speed of about 0.01 c as mapping directly to the thermal extent. We shall double it to convert it from an absolute-value scalar to the one-dimensional magnitude of the temperature factor in a neutrino velocity vector on the line of flight between the supernova and Earth. The thermal extent may be scaled, if desired, based on the reader’s favorite proba bility theory (e. g., [14]); the creation spectral distribution has been described as Planckian [15]. We note that for purely thermal particles, we would add the crea tion interval, left for now as an unknown, to the thermal extent to get the detection in terval. So, taking the distance from the Supernova to E arth as sSE , the spatial line-of- flight dispersion of interneutrino distance at Earth as dsSE, and the speed of the neutrino as vSE, the thermal extent dtSEt may be computed from the supernova (or Earth) proper transit time tSE using these relations:J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 7 tt sSE SE SEνγ γυ= = , with γυ= −      − 121 SE c; and, (3) dtds v t SEt SE SEp SE= =2 2γυ γυν, (4) in which tν is the neutrino-proper transit time and γ gives the Lorentz (special relativity) transformation. As already mentioned, the fac tor of 2 in eq. (4) is because of the assumed bidirectional random projection of the th ermal velocity of any given neutrino on the direction vector of the supernova-Eart h line of flight. Defining the conversion factor psk = (3.26)(602)(24)(365) c = 3 1016⋅ for meters per parsec, eqs. (3) and (4) may be combined into one formula for thermal extent, dts psk cSEt p SE SESE= −      2 122υ υυ. (5) B. Rest mass from velocity and thermal extent In general, the total energy E of any free particle with momentum p and rest mass m in transit in a vacuum is given by ( )( ) E pc mc2 2 22= + (6) Solving (6) for m after substituting mυγ for p yields, for the (anti)neutrino, mE c cE c c c cνυ υ υ=−=− − −2 2 32 32 ( ) ( ). (7)J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 8 Now, (7), (5), and (2) yield the rest mass formula, d epending on energy Et of the thermal extent, ( )mE cdt c dt s pskk mTtt t t SEB ppSE SEν= +22 3, (8) the superscript indicating the energy by assumption exclus ively contributing to the thermal extent. We note that the thermal speed υp has been eliminated in favor of temperature and thermal energy, and that there is no assumption of any spread in particle energies in (8). Also, (8) is an expected-value estimate, d epending solely on the bounds of its parameters; it is not a formula for an upper or lower bound. IV. Energy Extent yields an Upper Bound on the Mass A proposed analysis based on energy dispersion was published by Zatsepin [16] in 1968, long before data were available; he seems to have believed t hat supernova data could not be used to estimate the neutrino rest mass if i t was above about 2 eVc2. The subsequent literature [10, 12-15, 17-31] based on energy analysis of the SN1987A data have concluded neutrino mass upper bounds in t he low tens of eV or less. Anada and Nishimura [27] used a temperature-based coherence argument to eliminate the SN1987A data as a way of evaluating the theory of neutrino type oscillations. Roos [24] mentioned the possibility of calcul ating a thermal-dispersion bound on the neutrino rest mass but evidently did not attempt a formula for it.J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 9 Abbott et al [21] used both energy and thermal parameters in a differential formulation which seemed to yield a zero rest mass because zero f ell near the middle of a fairly broad error range. At least one author [19] h as asserted that "model- independent" limits are not reliable. The majority of the pub lished papers on the subject introduce specific supernova or particle assumptions . Reasonable model-independent formulae for the energy extent usuall y assume a neutrino creation interval of a few seconds or less. Here, we a dopt a variation of a formula in [10; cf. 24] as follows, dts cm c ESEE SE E=  ν22 , (9) in which dtSEE is the energy extent, sSE is as above, and EE is the energy of the detected neutrino. The detected energy of course would include an y thermal kinetic component determined by the primitive temperature. There is an implied assumption that the creation interval amounted to a negligib le time, so that the energy extent would refer to all or most of the detection interval; namely, ∆E EE E≅ ⇒1 ( ) ( )duration E duration EE E∆ ≅ 1. This yields an upper bound on the mass: The ∆EE cannot reasonably exceed EE; and this formula ignores the kinetic term in (6) above, moving supernumerary energy into the mc2 mass. Solving (9) for the neutrino mass mν yields ( )mE cdt c s pskEE E SESE ν= , (10)J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 10 which may be compared with the formula (8) above for mt ν. V. Implications of the Two Rest Mass Formulae Suppose the neutrino creation kinematic energy was constant, so all neutrinos were created with the same energy, but with different thermal variation. Then, the thermal extent would equal the energy extent and not merely be in cluded in the latter. In this case, (8) might be used alone to estimate the rest mass. We here accept that the kinematic energy was not equal for every neutrino, and so might be used to account for any assumed difference between c reation and detection intervals. The thermal (8) and energy (10) estim ates each yield a mass based on an unknown overlap in the thermal vs. energy contributions. However, in neither formula is the overlap defined; thus, in neither is i t constrained. So, having assuming a nonzero rest mass, we equate the mt ν and mE ν masses (8) and (10) of the neutrino and arrive at the following formula, dt dts psk cE E ckT mcreate SESEt E Bp p= −  −    223 , (1 1) in which the expected-value brackets for Et have been dropped. Using the trial values, dtSE=10s and EE= 10 MeV, we find that dtcreate from (11) can be within a few seconds of zero only for values of Et about as shown in Table 1. EE only implies an upper bound on the mass because of (10); it is i ndependent otherwise of any bound. So, the value of EE might be used directly in place of Et in (8) for aJ. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 11 mass estimate, provided a model or theory could account for the thermal fraction at the detector. Table 1 shows that 10 MeV neutrinos created at a primitive temperature of 109 K would require Et near 1 MeV. Happily, the range of the energy ratio near dtcreate=0 in (11) is relatively insensitive to the value of dtSE chosen; the Table 1 dependence on primitive temperature is relatively mild in the region tab ulated. TABLE 1. Neutrino energy in the thermal extent, for EE = 10 MeV, yielding a creation interval near zero in eq. (11), for various supernova temperatures. Primitive Temperature Tp (K)Energy of Thermal Extent Et(MeV) 108 0.611 109 1.08 1010 1.93 1011 3.43 1012 6.09 Finally, Fig. 2 displays the rest mass here estimated for the first time by the thermal extent; it also shows how the energy extent provides an upper bound as ordinarily estimated. Taking the detection interval as 2 s, which seems not unreasonable from the Kamiokande II data in Figure 1, we conc lude that the mass would be a few eVc2and can not exceed about 6 eVc2. If we were allowed the additional assumption that the creation interval was, say 1.5 s, we could use Figure 2 to conclude a neutrino mass of about 3 eVc2. Conversely, if we knew the neutrino mass to be, say, 1 eV, we would know that the creati on interval was just 1.8 s. As shown by the differences between the thermal-extent and energy-extent-J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 12 bound curves in Figure 2, as the assumed creation interval decreases, the thermal extent comes to dominate the detection interval, regardless of the supernova model. The same dominance would be expected under an increase in the as sumed supernova primitive temperature. dtcreate (s)Neutrino Mass (eV/c2) 0246810121416 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Energy Extent Bound From Thermal Extent dtSE = 10 s dtSE = 2 s FIG. 2. Rest mass of the SN1987A neutrinos as a function of the creation interval, from eqs. (8) and (10), for two val ues of the detection interval, dtSE. VI. Conclusion We have shown that the thermal line-of-flight dispersion of t he neutrinos from supernova SN1987A might be used to estimate the rest mass, kn owing the fraction of neutrino energy at the detector attributable to temperature. Then, assuming massive neutrinos created in an interval not exceeding 10 secon ds and at a boron- like primitive temperature of 109 K, we used an upper-bound formula to find thatJ. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 13 the thermal fraction might reasonably account for about 10% of the neutrino energy at Kamiokande II. From this, not the energy upper bound per se , it followed that the neutrino rest mass, here assumed not zero, would be as much as a few eVc2. The present approach assumed nothing about the supernova dyna mics but still yielded an expected value, not a bound. Any supernova model p roviding a better estimate of the thermal energy fraction would yield a better exp ected value. References Note: For references marked " UT-kek ", visit the University of Tokyo at: http://neutrino.kek.jp (under construction as of July 2000). For references marked " arXiv ", visit Los Alamos National Laboratory at: http://xxx.lanl.gov . 1. J. M. Blatt and V. F. Weisskopf, p. 10 in Theoretical Nuclear Physics , Springer- Verlag, New York, USA (1952). Republished by Dover, New Yor k, in 1991. 2. Y. Nir, "Flavor Physics and CP Violation", arXiv , hep-ph/9810520 (1998). 3. D. Spergel, "Particle Dark Matter", ch. 11 in Bahcal l and Ostriker (Eds.), Unsolved Problems in Astrophysics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 1997). 4. J. N. Bahcall, "Solar Neutrinos: Solved and Unsolved Pr oblems", ch. 10 in Bahcall and Ostriker (Eds.), Unsolved Problems in Astrophysics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 1997).J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 14 5. C. W. Kim and A. Pevsner, Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics (Harwood Academic Publishers, Langhorne, Pennsylvania, USA, 1993), Chapter 8. 6. H. Suzuki and K. Sato, "Time Profile of the Neutrino Burs t from the LMC Supernova, SN1987a", UT-kek , UTAP 53/87 (1987) 7. A. Suzuki, "Kamiokande Solar Neutrino Experiment and Solar Neutrino Problem", UT-kek (1991). 8. K. Hirata et al Kamiokande-II Collaborators, "Observat ion of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN1987a", UT-kek , UT-ICEPP-87-01 (1987) . 9. P. Goldreich, D. Lai, and M. Sahrling, "Globally As ymmetric Supernova", ch. 14 in Bahcall and Ostriker (Eds.), Unsolved Problems in Astrophysics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 1997). 10. J. N. Bahcall and S. L. Glashow, "Upper Limit on t he Mass of the Electron Neutrino", UT-kek , Preprint 87-05-144 (1987). 11. H. Suzuki and K. Sato, "Statistical Analysis of the Neutrino Burst from SN1987A", UT-kek , UTAP 68/88 (1988) . 12. G. G. Raffelt, "Neutrino Masses in Astrophysics and Cosmology" (in Proc. Summer School on Physics and Neutrinos , Zuoz, Switzerland, Aug. 1996), arXiv , hep-ph/9704315 (1997) . 13. T. Takatsuka, "Neutrino Burst from SN1987A and Pul sar Glitches from a Viewpoint of Pion-Condensed Neutron Stars", UT-kek , Preprint 8909531 (1989).J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 15 14. L. M. Krauss, P. Romanelli, and D. N. Schramm, "T he Signal from a Galactic Supernova: Measuring the Tau Neutrino Mass", UT-kek , FERMILAB-Pub- 91/293-A (1991). 15. J. A. Grifols, "Astrophysical (SN1987A) Constraint s on the Dirac Neutrino Mass", UT-kek , UAB-FT-283 (1992). 16. G. T. Zatsepin, Soviet Physics JETP Lett , 8, p. 333 (1968). 17. E. Adelberger, E. et al N1 Working Group, "Kinematica l Probes of Neutrino Mass" (pp. 195-214 in Particle and Nuclear Astrophysics and Cosmology in the Next Millennium: Proc. Snowmass Summer Study , Snowmass, Colorado, 1994), UT-kek , NSF-PT-95-0 (1995). 18. P. J. Kernan and L. M. Krauss, "Yet Another Paper on SN1987a: Large Angle Oscillations, and the Electron Neutrino Mass", arXiv , astro-ph/9410010 (1994). 19. Kolb, E. W., Stebbins, A. J., and Turner, M. S., "H ow Reliable are Neutrino Mass Limits Derived from SN1987A?", UT-kek , FERMILAB-Pub-87/74-A (1987). 20. C. M. Xu and X. J. Wu, "Examination of Neutrino Res t Mass from SN1987A", UT-kek (1987). 21. L. F. Abbott, A. De Rujuia, and T. P. Walker, "Con straints on the neutrino mass from the Supernova data: a systematic analysis", UT-kek , CERN-TH-4799/87 BUHEP 87-24 (1987).J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 16 22. M. Yuqian and H. Wuliang, "The neutrino mass and the periodicity of the neutrino burst from SN1987A", UT-kek (1988). 23. M. Roos, "Neutrino Mass Determinations from the Supernova SN 1987A Bursts", UT-kek , HU-TFT-87-10 (1987). 24. M. Roos, "On Determination of the Neutrino Mass in Neutr ino Astronomy", UT- kek, HU-TFT-88-26 rev (1988). 25. B. Kayser, "Neutrino Mass", (in Proc. Third Conference on the Interactions between Particle and Nuclear Physics , Rockport, Maine, May 1988), UT-kek , LBL-25380 (1988). 26. P. Langacker, "Neutrino Mass", sect. 6.3 in UT-kek , UPR-0470T (1991). 27. H. Anada and H. Nishimura, "On the Neutrino Oscil lation and the Neutrino Burst from SN1987A", UT-kek , KOBE-87-04 (1987). 28. J. W. Moffat, "Weak Equivalence Principle Test From SN 1987A", UT-kek (1988). 29. J. A. Grifols, E. Masso, S. Peris, "Majoron Couplings to Neutrinos and SN1987A", UT-kek , UAB-FT-190/88 (1988). 30. P. Langacker, "Neutrino Mass and Oscillations, Th eory and Expectations", UT- kek, UPR-0386T (1989) . 31. K. Sato and H. Suzuki, "Analysis of Neutrino Burst f rom the Supernova in LMC", UT-kek , UTAP-47 (1987) (Citing a formula by T. Piran in 19 81).J. M. Williams Neutrino Temp v. 1.05 17 32. S. M. Bilenky, C. Giuntu, W. Grimus, "Phenomenology of Neutrino Oscillations", arXiv , hep-ph/9812360 (1998) . Acknowledgements The author thanks Kai Martens for a copy of the Kamiokande I I data for the present analysis. Thanks also are due to Mario Rabinowitz , for reading the paper and suggesting some improvements. This paper was not supported by any grant to the author, w ho is an independent investigator, but it was inspired by presentations attended at the SLAC Summer Institute, The Physics of Leptons , given in August 1997.
arXiv:physics/0007036v1 [physics.geo-ph] 12 Jul 2000Ionospheric eﬀects of the solar ﬂares of September 23, 1998 and July 29, 1999 as deduced from global GPS network data Afraimovich E. L., Altyntsev A. T., Kosogorov E. A., Larina N . S., and Leonovich L. A. Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SD RAS, p. o. box 4026, Irkutsk, 664033, Russia fax: +7 3952 462557; e-mail: afra@iszf.irk.ru Abstract This paper presents data from ﬁrst GPS measurements of globa l re- sponse of the ionosphere to solar ﬂares of September 23, 1998 and July 29, 1999. The analysis used novel technology of a global dete ction of iono- spheric eﬀects from solar ﬂares (GLOBDET) as developed by on e of the authors (Afraimovich E. L.). The essence of the method is tha t use is made of appropriate ﬁltering and a coherent processing of va riations in total electron content (TEC) in the ionosphere which is dete rmined from GPS data, simultaneously for the entire set of visible (over a given time interval) GPS satellites at all stations used in the analysi s. It was found that ﬂuctuations of TEC, obtained by removing the linear tre nd of TEC with a time window of about 5 min, are coherent for all station s and beams to the GPS satellites on the dayside of the Earth. The time pro ﬁle of TEC responses is similar to the time behavior of hard X-ray emiss ion variations during ﬂares in the energy range 25-35 keV if the relaxation t ime of elec- tron density disturbances in the ionosphere of order 50-100 s is introduced. No such eﬀect on the nightside of the Earth has been detected y et. 1 Introduction The enhancement of X-ray and ultraviolet radiation intensi ty that is observed during chromospheric ﬂares on the Sun immediately causes an increase in electron density in the ionosphere. These density variations are diﬀ erent for diﬀerent altitudes and are collectively called Sudden Ionospheric D isturbances (SID). SID observations provide a key means for ground-based detectio n of solar ﬂares along with optical observations of ﬂares and solar radio burst obs ervations. Much 1research is devoted to SID studies, among them a number of tho rough reviews and monographs [14]. Unlike eﬀects in the optical and radio ranges, ionospheric e ﬀects of ﬂares are of special interest as they constitute a response of iono spheric plasma to an impulsive ionization. Quantitative study of SID has two major implications at pres ent. SID data in the D-region that were obtained predominantly by recordi ng amplitude and phase characteristics of signals from LF and VLF radio stati ons can be the source of information about the X-ray part of the ﬂare spectrum, as w ell as providing a tool for investigating the principal chemical processes in this region. SID data for the F-region acquired by diﬀerent radio probing methods were used repeatedly to estimate time variations in the X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) spectral regions and in relative measurements of ﬂuxe s in diﬀerent wave- length ranges [7]; [16]; [12]. The main body of SID data for th e Earth’s upper atmosphere was obtained in earlier detections of Sudden Fre quency Deviations (SFD) of the F-region-reﬂected radio signal in the HF range [6]; [7]. SFD are caused by an almost time-coincident increase in E- an d F-region electron densities at over 100 km altitudes covering an area with the size com- parable to or exceding that of the region monitored by the sys tem of HF radio paths. A limitation of this method is the uncertainty in the s patial and altitude localization of the UV ﬂux eﬀect, the inadequate number of pa ths, and the need to use special-purpose equipment. Another highly informative technique is the incoherent sca tter (IS) method, one of the most universal tools for ionosphere research. In [ 16], important infor- mation was obtained about the height distribution of the dec rease in local electron density Neduring the ﬂares of May 21 and 23, 1967. A signiﬁcant increase ofNe (by as much as 200 %) was recorded in the E-region, which decre ased gradually in the F-region with an up to 10-30 % increase of the height and remained dis- tinguishable up to 300 km. Nestarts to increase initially in the E-region, while at higher altitudes it is observed to be delayed, which is par ticularly conspicuous at the F-region heights. The Millstone Hill IS facility recorded the ﬂare of August 7, 1972 [13]. The measurements were made in the range from 125 to 1200 km, i.e. t o the alti- tudes exceeding greatly those of all preceding observation s. The increase of Ne amounted to 100 % at 125 km altitude and to 60 % at 200 km. Implementing the IS method requires extremely sophisticat ed, expensive equipment. There are only a few IS facilities world-wide, wh ich are concentrated mainly in America and Europe. These systems were designed fo r solving a broad gamut of scientiﬁc problems and do not provide round-the-cl ock observations of ionospheric eﬀects from solar ﬂares. An added diﬃculty invo lves inadequate time resolution. Currently it is common knowledge that the rise a nd fall time of the solar ﬂare emission in the range 10-1030 ˚A, which has eﬀect on the ionospheric - and F-regions, is often shorter than 5-10 min, typical of the IS me thod’s time 2resolution. Since the relaxation time of electron density i n theE- andF1-regions is also less than 5-10 min, most incoherent scatter measurem ents lack adequate time resolution for studying ionospheric eﬀects of ﬂares. The eﬀect of solar ﬂares on the ionospheric F-region is also manifested as a Sudden Increase of Total Electron Content (SITEC) which was measured previ- ously using continuously operating VHF radio beacons on geo stationary satellites [14]; [12]. In [12], a pioneering attempt was made to realize global obse rvations of the outstanding ﬂare of August 7, 1972 using 17 stations in North America, Europe, and Africa. The observations covered a territory whose boun daries were separated by 70◦in latitude and by 10 hours in local time. For diﬀerent statio ns, the value ofdI(TEC increase) varied from 1 .8 1016−2to 8.6 1016−2, or 15 −30% of a total electron content. These investigations revealed a la titudinal dependence of the amount of TEC increase. The low latitudes showed a larger increase of TEC compared with the high latitudes. Besides, the authors poin t out no correlation between the value of TEC increase and the solar zenith angle. A limitation of the SITEC method is the integral character of results which reﬂect the electron density variation in the height range fr om 100 to 2000 km. If, however, it is taken into consideration that only a few cu rrent methods en- able ﬂare eﬀects to be recorded in the ionospheric F-region, SITEC observations should be recognized as one of the most convenient tools for c ontinuous observa- tions of the F-region. A serious limitation of methods based on analyzing VHF signa ls from geo- stationary satellites is their small and ever increasing (w ith the time) number and the nonuniform distribution in longitude. Hence it is im possible to make measurements in some geophysically interesting regions of the globe, especially in high latitudes. Consequently, none of the above-mentioned existing method s can serve as an eﬀective basis for the radio detection system to provide a co ntinuous, global SID monitoring with adequate space-time resolution. Furtherm ore, the creation of these facilities requires developing special-purpose equ ipment, including powerful radio transmitters contaminating the radio environment. The advent and evolution of a Global Positioning System, GPS , and also the creation on its basis of widely branched networks of GPS stat ions (at least 600 sites at the end of 1999, the data from which are placed on the I NTERNET) opened up a new era in remote ionospheric sensing. In the very near future this network will be extended by integrating with the Russia n navigation system, GLONASS [11]. Furthermore, there exist also powerful regio nal networks such as the Geographical Survey Institute network in Japan [15] con sisting of up to 1000 receivers. High-precision measurements of the group and ph ase delay along the line-of-sight (LOS) between the receiver on the ground and t ransmitters on the GPS system satellites covering the reception zone are made u sing two-frequency multichannel receivers of the GPS system at almost any point of the globe and 3at any time simultaneously at two coherently coupled freque nciesf1= 1575 .42 MHz and f2= 1227 .60 MHz. The sensitivity of phase measurements in the GPS system is su ﬃcient for de- tecting irregularities with an amplitude of up to 10−3–10−4of the diurnal TEC variation. This makes it possible to formulate the problem o f detecting iono- spheric disturbances from diﬀerent sources of artiﬁcial an d natural origins. Re- cently some authors embarked actively on the development of detection tools for the ionospheric response of powerful earthquakes [3], rock et launches [4], and in- dustrial surface explosions [8]; [5]. Subsequetly, the GPS data began to be used in the context of the spaced-receiver method using three GPS st ations to determine the parameters of the full wave vector of traveling ionosphe ric disturbances under quiet and disturbed geomagnetic conditions [1]; [2]. The objective of this paper is to develop a method of global de tection of the ionospheric eﬀect from solar ﬂares (GLOBDET) using the inte rnational GPS net- work. This method would improve substantially the sensitiv ity and space-time resolution of analysis when compared with the above-mentio ned radio probing methods. General information about the ﬂares being analyze d here and a de- scription of the experimental geometry are given in Section 2. The processing technique for the data from the GPS network and results of an a nalysis of the ionospheric eﬀect from the solar ﬂares of September 23, 1998 and July 29, 1999 are outlined in Section 3. Section 4 discusses the results ob tained. A modeling of the physical processes involving ﬂare eﬀects on the ionos phere using GPS data and, moreover, the development of methods for solving their inverse problem of reconstructing emission characteristics using GPS data wi ll be subject of future research. 2 Experimental geometry, and general data on the solar ﬂares of September 23, 1998 and July 29, 1999 For studying the ionospheric response to the ionizing emiss ion from solar ﬂares, we chose relatively powerful (according to an X-ray classiﬁ cation) ﬂares whose time proﬁle was characterized by intense short-duration im pulses of hard X-ray emission. The two ﬂares selected appear in Table 1. The table also provides information about the characteristics of the CGRO- and YOHK OH-borne X-ray detectors, the data from which are compared with the ionosph eric response to these ﬂares in this paper. Fig. 1 presents the geometry of a global GPS array used in this paper to analyze the eﬀects of ﬂare 23 September 1998 (102 stations – a .) and 29 July 1999 (105 station–b.). Heavy dots correspond to the locatio n of the GPS stations. The coordinates of the stations are not given here for reason s of space. The upper 4scales indicate the local time, LT, corresponding to 07:00 U T, a maximum increase in X-ray emission intensity of the ﬂare 23 September 1998 and 19:30 UT for 29 July 1999 (see Section 3)). As is evident from Fig.1, the set of stations which we chose ou t of the global GPS network available to us, covers rather densely North Ame rica and Europe, but provides much worse coverage of the Asian part of the terr itory used in the analysis. The number of GPS stations in the Paciﬁc and Atlant ic regions is even fewer. However, coverage of the territory with partial beam s to the satellite for the limitation on elevations θ >10◦, which we have selected, is substantially wider. Dots in Fig. 1c mark the coordinates of subinospheric points for the height of the F2–layer maximum hmax= 300 km for all visible satellites at 29 July 1999, 19:30 UT for each GPS station. A total number of beams (and sub ionospheric points) used in this paper to analyze the July 29, 1999 ﬂare is 622. Such coverage of the terrestrial surface makes it possible t o solve the problem of detecting time-coincident events with spatial resoluti on (coherent accumula- tion) two orders of magnitude higher, as a minimum, than coul d be achieved in SFD detection on oblique HF paths. For simultaneous event s in the western hemisphere, the correspoding today’s number of stations an d beams can be as many as 400 and 2000–3000, respectively. Figs. 2b and 3b show the time dependencies of ﬂare emission. T ime proﬁles of soft X-ray emission were acquired by the GOES-10 satellit e, the data from which are available on the SPIDER network (marked by the symb ol o). Dashes in Figs. 2b and 3b represent values for the low-energy 1-8 ˚Achannel. The time proﬁle of the signal in the 0.5-4 ˚Achannel was alike. A comparative analysis of these series is made in Section 6. The study was based on events, for which ﬂare emission data wi th a time resolution of about one second were available. The Septembe r 23, 1998 ﬂare was recorded by X-ray telescope HXT on the YOHKOH satellite (Fig . 3b). Operat- ing in the ﬂare mode, the HXT telescope provides observation s in four energy channels (14-23 keV, 23-33 keV, 33-53 keV, and 53-93 keV) wit h a resolution of 0.5 s. The second event was observed by the BATSE spectromete r on the CGRO satellite which is capable of recording solar X-ray emissio n with diﬀerent tem- poral and spectral resolutions. This study utilized DISCLA data written in four channels (25-50 keV, 50-100 keV, 100-300 keV, and over 300 ke V) at 1.024-second intervals. The events are both characterized by a low level of geomagnet ic disturbance (from -10 to -20 nT), which simpliﬁed greatly the SID detecti on problem. 53 Processing of the data from the GPS network, and results derived from analyzing the iono- spheric eﬀect from the solar ﬂares of Septem- ber 23, 1998 and July 29, 1999 Following is a brief outline of the global monitoring (detec tion) technique for solar ﬂares (GLOBDET) as developed by one of the authors (Afr aimovich E. L.) on the basis of processing the data from a worldwide network o f two-frequency multichannel receivers of the GPS-GLONASS navigation syst ems. A physical groundwork for the method is formed by the eﬀect of fast change in electron density in the Earth’s ionosphere at the time of a ﬂare simultaneously on the entire sunlit surface. Essentially, the method impli es using appropriate ﬁltering and a coherent processing of TEC variations in the i onosphere simulta- neously for the entire set of ”visible” (during a given time i nterval) GPS satellites (as many as 5-10 satellites) at all global GPS network statio ns used in the anal- ysis. In detecting solar ﬂares, the ionospheric response is virtually simultaneous for all stations on the dayside of the globe within the time re solution range of the GPS receivers (from 30 s to 0.1 s). Therefore, a coherent p rocessing of TEC variations implies in this case a simple addition of single T EC variations. The detection sensitivity is determined by the ability to de tect typical signals of the ionospheric response to a solar ﬂare (leading edge dur ation, period, form, length) at the level of TEC background ﬂuctuations. Ionosph eric irregularities are characterized by a power spectrum, so that background ﬂu ctuations will al- ways be distinguished in the frequency range of interest. Ho wever, background ﬂuctuations are not correlated in the case of beams to the sat ellite spaced by an amount exceeding the typical irregularity size. With a typical length of X-ray bursts and EUV emission of sola r ﬂares of about 5-10 min, the corresponding ionization irregularity size d oes normally not exceed 30-50 km; hence the condition of a statistical independence of TEC ﬂuctuations at spaced beams is almost always satisﬁed. Therefore, coher ent summation of responses to a ﬂare on a set of beams spaced thoughout the days ide of the globe permits the solar ﬂare eﬀect to be detected even when the resp onse amplitude on partial beams is markedly smaller than the noise level (back ground ﬂuctuations). The proposed procedure of coherent accumulation is essenti ally equivalent to the operation of coincidence schemes which are extensively used in X-ray and gamma-ray telescopes. If the SID response and background ﬂuctuations, respective ly, are considered to be the signal and noise, then as a consequence of a statisti cal independence of background ﬂuctuations the signal/noise ratio when detect ing the ﬂare eﬀect is increased through a coherent processing by at least a factor of√ N, where Nis the number of LOS. 6It should be noted that because of the relatively low satelli te orbit inclinations, the GPS network (and to a lesser degree GLONASS) provides poo r coverage of the Earth’s surface near the poles. However, TEC measurements i n the polar regions are ineﬀective with respect to the detection of the ionosphe ric response to a solar ﬂare because the amplitude of background ﬂuctuations in thi s case is much higher when compared with the mid-latitude ionosphere. This is par tiocularly true of geomagnetic disturbance periods. For the same reason, equa torial stations should also be excluded from a coherent processing. The GPS technology provides the means of estimating TEC vari ations on the basis of phase measurements of TEC Iin each of the spaced two-frequency GPS receivers using the formula [10]; [4]: I=1 40.308f2 1f2 2 f2 1−f2 2[(L1λ1−L2λ2) +const +nL] (1) where L1λ1andL2λ2are phase path increments of the radio signal, caused by the phase delay in the ionosphere (m); L1,L2is the number of full phase rotations, and λ1, andλ2, are the wavelengths (m) for the frequencies f1andf2, respectively; const is some unknown initial phase path (m); and nLis the error in determination of the phase path (m). Phase measurements in the GPS system are made with a high degr ee of ac- curacy where the error in TEC determination for 30-second av eraging intervals does not exceed 1014−2, although the initial value of TEC does remain unknown [10]. This permits ionization irregularitues and wave proc esses in the ionosphere to be detected over a wide range of amplitudes (as large as 10−4of the diurnal variation of TEC) and periods (from several days to 5 min). Th e TEC unit, TECU , which is equal to 1016−2and is commonly accepted in the literature, will be used throughout the text. The solar ﬂare of July 29, 1999 was used to illustrate the perf ormance of the proposed method. Primary data include series of ”oblique” v alues of TEC I(t), as well as the corresponding series of elevations θ(t) and azimuths α(t) along LOS to the satellite calculated using our developed CONVTEC program which converts the GPS system standard RINEX-ﬁles on the INTERNET [9]. The determination of SID characteristics involves selecting c ontinuous series of I(t) measurements of at least a one-hour interval in length, whic h includes the time of the ﬂare. Series of elevations θ(t) and azimuths α(t) of the beam to the satellite are used to determine the coordinates of subionospheric poi nts. In the case under consideration, all results were obtained for elevations θ(t) larger than 10◦. Fig. 4a presents typical time dependencies of an ”oblique” T ECI(t) for the PRN03 satellite at the CME1 station on July 29, 1999 (thick li ne) and for PRN21 at the CEDA station (thin line). It is apparent from Fig. 4a th at in the presence of slow TEC variations, the SID-induced short-lasting sudd en increase in TEC is clearly distinguished in the form of a ”step” as large as 0.4 TECU . 7For the same series, similar lines in panel b. show variation s of the time derivative of TEC dI(t)/dtwith the linear trend removed and with a smoothing with the 5-min time window. The TEC time derivative is invoke d because it reﬂects electron density variations which are proportiona l to the X-ray or EUV ﬂux [14]. ThedI(t)/dtvariations for diﬀerent beams are well correlated over the t ime interval from 19:30 to 19:39 UT. This is distinguished in a mo re instructive way if series of the time derivative dI(t)/dtfor all visible satellites from 105 GPS stations are plotted on the same time scale (panel d). Time-coinciden t (for all beams) dI(t)/dtvariations are clearly seen; for the remaining time spans of the time interval 19:00–20:00, UT variations of dI(t)/dtfor diﬀerent sites and satellites are not correlated and occupy the entire amplitude-time ran ge. The coherent summation of dI(t)/dtirealizations was made by the formula ΣdI(t)/dt=N/summationdisplay i=1dI(t)/dtisin(θi) (2) where θiis LOS elevation, i- number of LOS; i= 1, 2, ... N. Multiplication by sin(θi) was used to convert ”oblique” TEC variations to an ”equivalent” vertical value in order to normalize the respo nse amplitude. The normalized to Nresult of a coherent summation (2) for all beams and GPS stations located mainly on the dayside is presented in pa nel c. A comparison of the resulting coherent sum (2) with the time dependence dI(t)/dtfor individual beams presented in panels b. and d. conﬁrms the eﬀect of a subs tantial increase of the signal/noise ratio caused by a coherent processing. It is interesting to compare, for the same time interval, the data on individual beams and results from a coherent summation for the dayside a nd nightside. Fig. 4e presents typical time dependencies of an ”oblique” T ECI(t) for the PRN27 satellite at the IRKT station (thick line) and for PRN2 7 at the BOGO station (thin line). Using the I(t) data it is impossible to identify any SID-induced short-lasting sudden increase in TEC. This is also true for t he time derivatives dI(t)/dtplotted in panels f. and h. As a result, the r.m.s. of the coher ent sum (2) in panel g. for the nightside is of the same order of magnit ude as that of background ﬂuctuations outside the SID response interval o n the dayside, which is an order of magnitude (as a minimum) smaller than the SID re sponse amplitude (Fig. 4c). Consider the data processing procedure for the solar ﬂare of September 23, 1998. Fig. 5 presents the time dependencies of TEC I(t) on the dayside – a. anddI(t) variations with the linear trend removed and smoothing wit h the 5- min time window for stations IRKT (PRN01) – b; dI(t) variations for all visible satellites from 102 GPS stations plotted on the same time sca le – d. One can clearly see simultaneous (for all GPS beams) dI(t) variations; for the remaining 8time spans of the interval 6:30-08:00 UT selected, dI(t) variations for diﬀerent sites and satellites are not correlated and occupy the entir e amplitude-time range. It should be noted that in this case the ratio of the amplitude of the iono- spheric response of the ﬂare to the phase ﬂuctuation amplitu de is substantially worse than that for the ﬂare of July 29, 1999. A preliminary co herent accumula- tion of dI(t)i-series with a subsequent diﬀerentiation, rather than diﬀe rentiation of single realizations of dI(t)iwith subsequent addition of the time derivatives seems more reasonable. The coherent summation of dI(t)irealizations was made for this event by the formula ΣdI(t) =N/summationdisplay i=1dI(t)isin(θi) (3) The (normalized to N) result of the coherent summation of series (3) for all beams and GPS stations located predominantly on the dayside is presented in panel c. Again, a comparison of the resulting coherent sum (3 ) with the time dependence of dI(t) for the individual beams shown in panels b. and d. conﬁrms the enhancement eﬀect of the signal/noise ratio beause of a c oherent processing. A similar result is also obtained by comparing (for the same t ime interval) the data from individual LOS and coherent summation results for the dayside and nightside. Fig. 5c presents typical time dependencies o f an ”oblique” TEC I(t) for the PRN14 satellite at station MAS1. The SID-induced sh ort-lasting sydden increasze of TEC was not possible to identify from the I(t) data. This applies also for the dI(t)-variations with the trend removed, which are plotted in panels f. and h. As a result, the standard deviation (SD) of th e coherent sum (3) in panel g. for the nightside is found to be of the same order o m agnitude as the backgrund ﬂuctuation SD outside the SID response range on th e dayside, which is an order of magnitude, as a minimum, less than the SID respo nse amplitude (Fig. 5c). 4 Discussion A comparative analysis is made of the TEC data and X-ray emiss ion time series acquired by satelites. In carrying out a comparative analys is of the TEC and X-ray emission to ﬂares, it is necessary to eliminate the TEC trend which is not associated with ﬂare emission. In this case the above proced ure of determining the trend that is removed by a smoothing over a 5-min interval, wh ich is signiﬁcantly shorter than the ﬂare emission duration, is incorrect. In Fi gs. 2 and 3, the trend to be removed was therefore deﬁned as a polynomial of degree 3 , approximating the time dependence of TEC on the intervals 19:00 and 20:00 UT , and 6:00-8:00 UT, respectively. The approximation procedure neglected t he TEC values during the ﬂares (19:30-19:48 UT, and 6:40-7:24 UT). 9First we consider a simpler ﬂare of July 29, 1999, with the X-r ay emission time proﬁle like a single impulse (dashed curve FHXTin Fig. 2b). The ﬂare is clearly seen on the time proﬁle of TEC I(t) (Fig. 2a). As is apparent from Fig. 2b, the response Iex(t) represents an impulse with a fast growth and a relatively sl ow decline. The time variation of soft X-ray emission, obtaine d from the GOES data at insuﬃciently large time intervals (marked by the symbol o in Fig. 2b) does not contradict the behavior of the curve Iex(t). The rise front of hard X-ray emission FHXTis steeper when compared with the response of TEC Iex(t) , and the time of a maximum is 1.5 min ahead of the TEC ﬂuctuation maximum. These diﬀerence are natural if acco unt is taken of the ﬁnite relaxation time of electron density disturbances cau sed by ﬂare emission. This factor can be taken into account by convoluting the sour ce function FHXT with the relaxation function: Fconv(t) =t/integraldisplay 0FHXT(t′) exp/bracketleftBigg −/parenleftBiggt−t′ τ/parenrightBigg/bracketrightBigg dt′(4) As is evident from Fig. 2c, the growth proﬁle of TEC Iex(t) is similar to that of the convolution Fconvwhen τ= 65 s. The convolution was accomplished with the X-ray signal of the 25-50 keV (0.25-0.5 A) energy channel. At the decay phase, the curves FconvandIex(t) are moving apart, which can be associated with the contribution to the ionospheric ionization from softer emi ssion whose time proﬁle is similar to the GOES ﬂux proﬁle. Short-duration disturbances on TEC dependencies, which ar e associated with the ionization by ﬂare emission, are more pronounced on the t ime derivatives dI(t)/dt. Fig. 2d compares the result of summation (2) of the series of the derivatives Σ dI(t)/dtfor all visible satellites from GPS stations located on the dayside, with the derivative d/dt(Fconv) presented in Fig. 2c. It can be seen that the growth stage of the coherent sum Σ dI(t)/dtfor the entire sunlit side of the Earth is described adequately by the function d/dt(Fconv). Note that the accuracy of estimating the duration τdetermined from the coincidence of peaks of the time derivatives is determined by time resolution of T EC measurements (30 s in the case under consideration). The ﬂare of September 23, 1998 was of a longer duration, and, d espite a somewhat higher intensity, its response was relatively sma ll on TEC time depen- dencies for separate paths (Fig. 3a). Nevertheless, by subt racting the polynomial of degree 3, it was possible to identify the TEC response Iex(t) (Fig. 3b). In this event, the time dependence of soft X-ray emission is muc h diﬀerent from the temporal behavior of the response Iex(t) which grows faster than does the GOES signal (marked by the symbol o), attains a maximum 9 min earli er, and decreaes much more rapidly. The signal of hard X-ray emission FHXT(dashed line) shows a number of peaks leading the TEC ﬂuctuations Iex(t). The convolution with the hard X-ray 10emission signal Fconvagrees satisfactorily with the response Iex(t), with τ= 100 s. The curves in Fig. 2c are most similar for the M1 (22-35 keV) channel of the HXT/YOHKOH X-ray telescope. The estimated τ= 100 s is conﬁrmed by comparing the combined time derivative of TEC Σ dI(t)/dt, with the derivative d/dt(Fconv). A comparison of the time proﬁles of the TEC response and hard X -ray emis- sion shows that corresponding electron density disturbanc es are recorded with conﬁdence by a global GPS network. For hard X-ray emission, t he highest cor- relation is attained for photon energies of about 30 keV, wit h relation times τ in the range 65-100 s. These estimates are in reasonably good agreement with results obtained previously when analyzing the SID eﬀect [7 ], [14]. Unfortunately, the lack of data on UV emission of the ﬂares un der investiga- tion, the most probable ionizing factor at ionospheric heig hts above 100 km, gives no way of making absolute estimates of the TEC increment and c omparing them with measured values. It is pointed out in [14] that although UV emission is es- sentially responsible for SID in the F-region, TEC variatio ns are also correlated quite well with X-ray ﬂares. This is also conﬁrmed by simulta neous measure- ments of X-ray and EUV ﬂare emission characteristics by the S olar Maximum Mission satellite [17]. 5 Conclusions In this paper we have analyzed the ionospheric response to po werful solar ﬂares of September 23, 1998 and July 29, 1999. The analysis is based on implementing our new technology of a global detector of ionospheric eﬀects fr om solar ﬂares using the data from the international network of two-frequency mu ltichannel receivers of the navigation GPS system (GLOBDET) which improves subst antially the sensitivity and space-time resolution of observations ove r existing radio probing methods. It was found that ﬂuctuations of TEC and its time derivative o btained by removing the linear trend of TEC with a time window of about 5 m in are coherent for all stations and beams to GPS satellites on the dayside of the Earth, regardless of the station’s location, local time and elevation of the be am to the satellite. The time proﬁle of TEC responses is similar to the time behavi or of hard X-ray emission variations during ﬂares in the energy range 25-35 k eV if we introduce the relation time of an electron density disturbance in the iono sphere of a duration of 50-100 s. No such eﬀect was detected on the nightside of the Earth. The GLOBDET technology, suggested in this paper, can be used to detect small solar ﬂares; the body of data processed is the only limi tation in this case. The high sensitivity of GLOBDET permits us to propose the pro blem of detect- ing, in the ﬂare X-ray and EUV ranges, emissions of nonsolar o rigins which are the result of supernova explosions. 11For powerful solar ﬂares like the one examined in this report , it is not neces- sary to invoke a coherent summation, and the SID response can be investigated for each beam. This opens the way to a detailed study of the SID dependence on a great variety of parameters (latitude, longitude, solar ze nith angle, spectral char- acteristics of the emission ﬂux, etc.). With current increa sing solar activity, such studies become highly challenging. In adidtion to solving t raditional problems of estimating parameters of ionization processes in the ion osphere and problems of reconstructing emission parameters [14], the data obtai ned through the use of GLOBDET can be used to estimate the spatial inhomogeneity of emission ﬂuxes at scales of the Earth’s radius. Acknowledgments Authors are grateful to V. V.Grechnev, E. A. Kosogorov, O. S. Lesuta and K. S. Palamartchouk for preparing the input data. Thanks are also due V. G. Mikhalkovsky for his assistance in preparing the Engli sh version of the TEX-manuscript. This work was done with support from the Russi an Foundation for Basic Research (grants 97-02-96060 and 99-05-64753), G NTP ’Astronomy’ as well as RF Minvuz Grant 1999; supervisor B.O. Vugmeister. References [1] Afraimovich, E. L., K. S. Palamartchouk, and N. P. Pereva lova, 1998. GPS radio interferometry of travelling ionospheric distur bances. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 60, 1205–1223. [2] Afraimovich E. L., E. A. Kosogorov, L. A. Leonovich, K. S. Palamarchuk, N. P. Perevalova, and O. M. Pirog, Determining parameters of large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances of auroral origin usin g GPS-arrays, Ac- cepted by Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Phy sics. [3] Calais E. and J. B. Minster, 1995. GPS detection of ionosp heric perturba- tions following the January 1994, Northridge earthquake. G eophysical Re- search Letters 22, 1045–1048. [4] Calais E. and J. B.Minster, 1996. GPS detection of ionosp heric pertur- bations following a Space Shuttle ascent, Geophysical Rese arch Letters 23, 1897–1900. [5] Calais E., B. J. Minster , M. A. Hofton , and M. A. H. Hedlin, 1998. Ionospheric signature of surface mine blasts from Global Po sitioning System measurements. Geophysical Journal International 132, 191 –202. 12[6] Davies K. Ionospheric radio waves, 1969. Blaisdell Publishing Company, A Division of Ginn and Company, Waltham, Massachusetts-Toto nto-London. [7] Donnelly R. F, 1969. Contribution of X-ray and EUV bursts of solar ﬂares to sudden frequency deviations. Journal Geophysical Researc h 74, 1873–1877. [8] Fitzgerald T. J., 1997. Observations of total electron c ontent perturbations on GPS signals caused by a ground level explosion. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 59, 829–834. [9] Gurtner, W., 1993. RINEX: The Receiver Independent Exch ange Format Version 2. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov:80/igscb/data/fo rmat/rinex2.txt. [10] Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., H. Lichtenegger, and J. Collin s,Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice, 1992. Springer-Verlag Wien, New York. [11] Klobuchar, J. A., 1997. Real-time ionospheric science : The new reality. Radio Science 32, 1943–1952. [12] Mendillo M., J. A. Klobuchar, R. B. Fritz, A. V. da Rosa, L . Kersley, K. C. Yeh, B. J. Flaherty, S. Rangaswamy, P. E. Schmid, J. V. Evans, J. P. Schodel, D. A. Matsoukas, J. R. Koster, A. R. Webster, P. Chin , 1974. Behavior of the Ionospheric F Region During the Great Solar F lare of August 7, 1972, Journal Geophysical Research 79, 665–672. [13] Mendillo M., and J. V. Evans, 1974. Incoherent scatter o bservations of the ionospheric response to a large solar ﬂare. Radio Science 9, 197–203. [14] Mitra A. P., 1974. Ionospheric eﬀects of solar ﬂares, New Delhi -12, India. [15] Saito A., S. Fukao and S. Miyazaki, 1998. High resolutio n mapping of TEC perturbations with the GSI GPS network over Japan. Geophysi cal Research Letters 25, 3079–3082. [16] Thome G. D and L. S.Wagner, 1971. Electron density enhan cements in the E and F regions of the ionosphere during solar ﬂares. Journal Geophysical Research 76, 6883–6895. [17] Vanderveen K., L. E. Orwig, and E. Tandberg-Hanssen, 19 88. Temporal correlations between impulsive ultraviolet and hard X-ray busts in solar ﬂares observed with high time resolution, Astrophysical Journal 330, 480–492. 13This figure "fig1sun.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/physics/0007036v1T able /1/: P arameters of the / ares b eing analyzedN Septem b er /2/3/, /1/9/9/8 July /2/9/, /1/9/9/9/1 Time of maxim umsoft X/-ra y emission/, UT /0/7/:/1/3 /1/9/:/3/4/2 Flare classoptical//X/-ra y /3B//M/7/./1 /1N // m /5/./1/3 X/-ra y class with thehighest HXT//YOHK OH/) CGR O//BA TSEdegree of correlation m /1/(/2/2/-/3/5 k eV/) /2/5/-/5/0 k eV/4 Incremen t of electroncon ten t/, TECU /0/./4 /0/./5/5 Relaxation time/, s /1/0/0 /6/5This figure "fig2sun.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/physics/0007036v1This figure "fig3sun.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/physics/0007036v1This figure "fig4sun.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/physics/0007036v1This figure "fg5sun.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/physics/0007036v1