Datasets:

anonymousdatasets

/

arxiv-physics

like 1

arXiv:physics/0007037v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 13 Jul 2000A New Regime of Anomalous Penetration of Relativistically S trong Laser Radiation into an Overdense Plasma A. Kim,1F. Cattani,2D. Anderson,2and M. Lisak2 1Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 603600 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia 2Department of Electromagnetics, Chalmers University of Te chnology, S-412 96 G¨ oteborg, Sweden Abstract It is shown that penetration of relativistically intense la ser light into an overdense plasma, accessible by self-induced transparency, occurs o ver a finite length only. The pen- etration length depends crucially on the overdense plasma p arameter and increases with increasing incident intensity after exceeding the thresho ld for self-induced transparency. Exact analytical solutions describing the plasma-field dis tributions are presented. PACS number(s): 52.40.Nk, 52.35.Mw, 52.60.+h, 52.58.Ns In the past few years there has been much research devoted to t he nonlinear interaction of superintense laser pulses with plasmas [1]. At intensities where electrons quiver with relativistic velocities, the interaction can be characterized as nonlin ear optics in relativistic plasmas, and new regimes, not evident at nonrelativistic intensities, m ay appear. As was previously shown, superintense electromagnetic radiation can propagate thr ough a classically overdense plasma due to the relativistic correction to the electron mass, the so called induced transparency effect, [2]-[10]. The present work has resulted in the identificatio n of a new fundamental process in relativistic laser overdense plasma interaction. In order to understand the nonlinear regime of interaction o f superintense laser light with an overdense plasma, it is enough, without loss of generalit y, to consider a stationary model. We present here a new class of exact analytical solutions des cribing the penetration of an electromagnetic wave normally incident onto a cold, overde nse plasma with a sharp boundary. In particular, we show that, when the incident intensity exc eeds the threshold for self-induced transparency, the laser energy penetrates into the dense pl asma without any losses, but over a finite length only. At the same time, the electron density dis tribution becomes structured as a sequence of electron layers separated by about half a wavele ngth wide depleted regions, so that this strongly nonlinear plasma structure acts as a distribu ted Bragg reflector. The ultrahigh intensity laser-plasma interaction is descr ibed by the relativistic equation of motion and the equation of continuity for the electrons to gether with Maxwell’s equations. Ions are treated as a uniform neutralizing background. We wi ll consider circularly polarized laser radiation with normalized amplitude of the vector pot entialeA/mc2= (a/√ 2)Re[(y+ iz)exp(iωt)] normally incident from vacuum ( x <0) onto a semi-infinite plasma ( x≥0). Assuming a stationary regime, the basic equations may be wri tten in the form φ′′=no(n−1), (1) a′′+ (1−no γn)a= 0, (2) φ′=γ′if and only if n(x)/negationslash= 0. (3) (where variables are normalized as x⇒ωx/c,n⇒n/no,no=ω2 p/ω2,ωis the carrier frequency of the laser radiation, ωpis the plasma frequency of the initial unperturbed plasma, γ= (1+a2)1/2is the relativistic factor, nandφare normalized electron density and scalar potential 1of the plasma respectively). Eq. (3) indicates that only in t he region where the electron density n(x)/negationslash= 0 the ponderomotive force, γ′(x), must be compensated by the force of a longitudinal field. This statement will be important for constructing sol utions of interest in the present analysis. For homogeneous ion density, the system has the following Ha miltonian HE=1 2(1 +a2)a′2−1 2(2no√ 1 +a2−a2) (4) which was analyzed in [5]. As we are interested in a semi-infinite plasma, we first consid er the case when n(x)→1 and botha(x) anda′(x) vanish as x→ ∞. In this case the integral of motion equals HE=−no≡ H 0. (5) Eq. (4) can then easily be integrated to yield the following s ingle-parametric solitary solution a(x) =Amcosh/bracketleftBig |ε0|1/2(x−x(0))/bracketrightBig nocosh2[|ε0|1/2(x−x(0))]− |ε0|(6) whereε0= 1−nois the dielectric permittivity of the plasma and the paramet erx(0)defines the position of the maximum of the function (6) which is given byAm= 2[no(no−1)]1/2. Forno>1.5 this solution contains a region where the electron density is negative, which is clearly unphysical. Requiring the minimum electron densit ynm= 1−4(no−1)2to be positive, i.e.nm≥0, we obtain a condition on the background plasma density and an argument in favor of the depletion region: for no>1.5 we have to take into account only that part of the solution where the corresponding electron density is posit ive,n(x)≥0.By using the part of the solution (6) corresponding to a ponderomotive force that pu shes electrons into the plasma and matching it to the vacuum one, an exact expression for the int ensity threshold of self-induced transparency was found, [11]. It should be noted that the Ham iltonian (5) corresponds to a zero energy flux, but there are solutions with non-zero flux as well, [2, 6]. They can arise even in correspondence to incident amplitudes smaller than the p enetration threshold. However, for the realization of such nonlinear hysteresis-like solutio ns, [10, 12], preliminary modifications of the plasma must be induced by extremely intense fields. For th e description of the steady-state of a problem involving laser radiation with turn-on shape it is natural to choose the zero flux approach. The left side of the function (6) gives rise to an unbalanced p onderomotive force pulling electrons out of the plasma towards the incident wave and, at first glance, it seems that the charge quasineutrality condition cannot be satisfied. Howe ver, after a length of about half a wavelength, these electrons will be stopped by the ponderom otive force acting in the opposite direction. Thus, in the general case, we may expect that the f ull plasma-field structure will consist of a sequence of alternating depletion and nondeple tion regions. This can be understood from Fig. 1, where the phase portraits described by Eqs (1)-( 3)and by the corresponding equation for the depletion (vacuum) region are presented. F or a half-space plasma the limiting case corresponds to a motion with infinite period along the se paratrix determined by Eq. (5), i.e., an exponentially decreasing field inside the overdens e plasma. Going backwards towards the initial vacuum-plasma boundary, before the last semi-i nfinite electron layer there must exist 2a depletion region. Here the amplitude of the field correspon ds to a forward going wave along the incident direction with an intensity below the threshol d value (corresponding to the motion along the first circular trajectory in phase space, coming fr om the vacuum Hamiltonian). Then, in front of this layer we have to put another electron layer, w here the solution for the field a(x) follows from the Hamiltonian (4) with a magnitude H>−no(corresponding to an oscillatory motion about zero). This construction is repeated until the initial plasma boundary is reached. At the boundary between each depletion and nondepletion reg ion, the solution for the field must satisfy continuity conditions for both aand its derivative a′. It is also clear that there exists a family of stationary solutions that differ from each other by the number of electron density layers and their shapes. When the incident amplitud e is increased, the number of layers will increase as well, as follows from the phase portraits in Fig. 1. In order to quantify the above discussion, we present a more r igorous analytical description. Starting from inside the plasma region, the solution for the field is an exponentially decreasing function of the spatial coordinate, in fact a part of the loca lized solution given by Eq. (6) with HE=H0forx0≤x <∞. The point x=x0can be determined self-consistently from the global solution and the boundary conditions a(x=x0) =a0, a′(x=x0) =a′ 0 (7) The next region ( x1< x < x 0) must be a depletion layer where n(x) = 0. The second boundary position of this depletion layer, x1, must also be determined self-consistently. The Hamiltonian here is the vacuum one and reads HV=1 2(a′2+a2) =1 2(a′2 0+a2 0)≡ H 1 (8) where we have taken into account the boundary conditions for the field and its first derivative. The solution of the field in this depletion region reads a(x) =A1cos(x+ψ1). (9) Using (7) we have: A1= (a′2 0+a2 0)1/2= (2H1)1/2,ψ1=−arctan(a′ 0/a0)−x0. The boundary positionx1can be calculated by integrating Poisson’s equation within the interval x1<x<x 0: φ′(x0)−φ′(x1) =−no(x0−x1). (10) which, together with relation (3), leads to a transcendenta l equation for ξ=x0−x1: ξ=g(ξ)−g(0) (11) where g(ξ) =A2 1sin[2(ξ+ξ1)] 2no[1 +A2 1cos2(ξ+ξ1)]1/2, ξ1= arctan/parenleftBigga′ 0 a0/parenrightBigg (12) Since the left-hand side of Eq. (11) is a linear function whil e its right-hand side is a periodic function of ξ, this equation has a non-trivial solution only if g′(ξ=−ξ1)>1, i.e. g′(ξ=−ξ1) =A2 1 no(1 +A2 1)1/2>1. (13) However, if no≤1.5, this condition is never satisfied, because its maximum val ue reaches one at no= 1.5. Consequently, for plasma densities no≤1.5 we conclude that there are no stationary 3regimes of anomalous penetration: there can only exist dyna mical solutions. For no>1.5, Eq. (11) always has non-trivial solutions, which can be foun d numerically. Formally, Eq. (11) admits several roots but we have to consider only those that c orrespond to a positive electron density. Having solved Eq.(11) we know a1=a(x1) anda′ 1=a′(x1). The next region must again be an electron layer. Denoting this region as x2≤x≤x1, the Hamiltonian (4) will here be HE=HE(a1,a′ 1)≡ H 2. (14) with the corresponding field solution written in terms of two -parameter elliptic functions for the field strength as a(x) =  2qcn[ε1/2 2(x−x(2))] 2+[(q2+1)1/2−1]sn2[ε1/2 2(x−x(2))],H2<no, 2¯qsn[((ε2+1)2−n2 o)1/2(x−x(2))/2] ¯q2−sn2[((ε2+1)2−n2o)1/2(x−x(2))/2],H2>no(15) The two parameters, ε2andx(2)are determined by the boundary conditions at x=x1. Here ε2= (n2 o+ 1 + 2 H2)1/2,q= [(ε2+no)2−1]1/2and ¯q= [(ε2+no+ 1)/(ε2+no−1)]1/2, k= [(n2 o−(ε2−1)2)/4ε2]1/2and¯k= [(ε2−1)2−n2 o)/(ε2+ 1)2−n2 o)]1/2are the moduli of the elliptic integrals of the first kind respectively for the two cases. This solution is realized over about a quarter period, where the electron density is positi ve and is given by n(x) =2√ 1 +a2 no/parenleftbigg H2+3 2no√ 1 +a2−a2/parenrightbigg (16) The second boundary position of this layer can now be defined w ith a certain arbitrariness, namely, it can be taken within the whole interval x∗≤x2≤x∗∗, wherex∗is such that n(x∗) = 0, whilex∗∗is defined by the existence of a solution of the transcendenta l equation (11). This problem comes up for every layer, therefore the global solut ion, for a given incident amplitude, in general may not be unique because the thickness of each pla sma layer is not uniquely fixed, the realization of each specific solution depending on the pr ehistory of the process. This is also confirmed by our preliminary simulations based on a hydrodyn amics approach where, at fixed incident amplitude, the thickness of the various electron l ayers in the quasi-stationary stage is quite different depending on the turn-on shape of the inciden t radiation. The appearance of non-unique solutions is typical of phenomena involving non linear media (see, for instance, [12]). For the sake of concreteness, in what follows, we choose the n ext boundary position x2as the point where the electron density vanishes, i.e. n(x2) = 0. In this case, the transcendental equation (11) always has nontrivial solutions because, if t he condition given by Eq. (13) is satisfied for the semi-infinite layer, it will automatical ly be satisfied for all the precedent electron layers, for the point where the electron density va nishes. As follows from (16), the field at this boundary is such that 3no(1 +a2 2)1/2= 2(a2 2− H 2) (17) and, making use of the equation for the Hamiltonian (14), we c an calculate the first derivative of the field. Thus, for the next depletion layer located within x3<x<x 2, we know the boundary values ofa2anda′ 2that are required to generate a solution by using the same pro cedure as before forx1< x < x 0. This procedure is repeated for every layer, xi+1< x < x i, up to the final layer and if Hi>no, the field solution has to be taken as in the second expression of (15). 4The last layer will be a depletion region 0 < x < x Nwherex= 0 is the real plasma-vacuum boundary. At this point the electric field due to charge separ ation must vanish. Integrating Poisson’s equation over the plasma interval, the plasma neu trality condition gives x0=1 noaNa′ N/radicalBig 1 +a2 N(18) which defines the last free parameter. Thus, matching the sol ution for the field to the vacuum solution at the electron layer boundary x=xNwe can relate the obtained plasma-field distri- bution to the incident electromagnetic wave. In this way we c an construct an exact stationary solution for the anomalous penetration regime. An example o f such a solution is presented in Fig. 2. Notice that the maximum of the electron density in a la yer increases from layer to layer, reaching an absolute maximum in the last layer neares t to the vacuum boundary while the width of the layers become more and more narrow. This may e asily be understood from Fig. 1; higher lying trajectories have higher values of the i ntegrals of motion. It also means that at higher incident wave amplitudes there are more layer s, so that the penetration length will increase with increasing incident intensity. These so lutions can naturally be extended to cover the case of plasma slabs with finite thickness, if the pe netration length is smaller than the slab thickness. The following consequence of the previous analysis should b e emphasized: For a fixed am- plitude the laser field penetrates only a finite length into th e overdense plasma. Consequently, if the incident laser pulse has a finite duration, the electro magnetic energy deposited in the plasma will be reflected back into the vacuum after the laser fi eld has vanished. Evidently the transient regime will be more complicated as vacuum (deplet ion) regions surrounded by elec- tron layers will show a resonator-like behaviour, with the e lectromagnetic energy being excited by the incident pulse. We expect this field structure to evolv e and to be slowly reflected back into the vacuum region. In conclusion, we have presented a new class of exact analyti cal stationary solutions describ- ing a new feature of the interaction between a super-intense laser and an overdense plasma. This analysis shows how, depending on the initial plasma den sity, the interaction might result in the generation of a new plasma-field structure consisting of alternating electron and ”vac- uum” regions, with the electromagnetic energy penetrating into the overdense plasma over a finite length determined by the incident intensity. This work was supported in part by the Russian Fund for Fundam ental Research (grants No. 98-02-17015 and No. 98-02-17013). One of the authors (F. C.) acknowledges support from the European Community under the contract ERBFMBICT972428 . Captions Fig. 1 Phase portrait of the system for no= 1.6 and homogeneous ion density, following from Eqs. (4) and (8), see also Fig. 2. The dashed lines stand f or vacuum regions, the con- tinuous lines stand for plasma regions, the actual trajecto ry is given by the thick line and it runs clockwise. The large dashed line denotes the regions wh ere the electron density is negative. Fig. 2 The continuous line represents the plasma-field structures in a semi-infinite plasma 5initially occupying the region x≥0, forno= 1.6, the unperturbed electron density being represented by the dashed line. The dotted line represents t he resulting electron density distri- bution. All quantities are dimensionless. References [1] S.C. Wilks and W. Kruer, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 33, 1954, (1997); see also in Superstrong Fields in Plasmas , AIP Conf. Proc. 426, (1998). [2] A.I. Akhiezer and R.V. Polovin, Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 696, 1956 [3] P.Kaw and J.Dawson, Phys. Fluids 13, 472 (1970). [4] C.Max and F.Perkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1342 (1971). [5] J.H.Marburger and R.F.Tooper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1001 (1975). [6] C. S. Lai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 966 (1976); F. S. Felber and J. H. Marburger, Phys. Rev. Lett.36, 1176 (1976). [7] E. Lefebvre and G. Bonnaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2002 (1995). [8] H. Sakagami and K. Mima, Phys. Rev. E 54, 1870 (1996). [9] S.Guerin, P.Mora, J.C.Adam et al., Phys. Plasma 3, 2693 (1996). [10] V.V. Goloviznin, T. J. Schep, JETP Lett. 70, 450 (1999) [11] F. Cattani et al., Phys. Rev. E, in press. [12] A.G. Litvak, Rev. Plasma Phys. 10, 294 (1992) 6Fig. 1 /G452 /G4510123 a/G452/G4510123a'Fig. 2 /G454 0 4 8 12 16 z0123456I,n

arXiv:physics/0007038v1 [physics.gen-ph] 13 Jul 2000Continuation of the Fermion-Number Operator and the Puzzle of Families∗ Gerald L. Fitzpatrick PRI Research and Development Corp. 12517 131 Ct. N. E. Kirkland, WA 98034 Abstract An “analytic continuation” of a Hermitian matrix represent ing the conventional fermion-number operator , leads to a new, and unconven- tional, internal description of quarks andleptons . This phenomenolog- ical description, unlike the conventional standard-model description, is capable of explaining, among other things, why there are j ustthree families of quarks and leptons. These facts provide indirec t evidence that the analytic continuation in question somehow reflects physics at the Planck level where flavor degrees-of-freedom presumabl y originate. 1.0 Introduction and Background Given the number of flavors of quarks and leptons, and an appro priate (renormalizable) lagrangian, the so-called “accidental s ymmetries” of the la- grangian [1] are known to “explain” the separate conservati on of various (global) “charges” (e.g., lepton number, baryon number, st rangeness, charm, truth, beauty, electron-, muon- and tau-numbers). However , there is nothing in such lagrangians, or their associated accidental symmet ries, that would ∗To be presented at DPF 2000 at The Ohio State University, Colu mbus, OH, August 9–12, 2000. Download from the APS e-print archive at: http:/ /publish.aps.org.eprint/. Paper number: aps2000mar19 003. 1explain quarks and leptons, or tell us how many flavors of quar ks and lep- tons to include. What is needed is a “spectrum-generating” m echanism for these particles. The current “consensus” in particle physics, at least among string theo- rists, seems to be that fundamental-fermion flavor degrees- of-freedom arise at the Planck level [2, 3]—or possibly at TeVenergies in the event that the extra dimensions are “large” [4]—in a theory of superstring s. The purpose of the present paper is to identify an apparently different, b ut probably com- plementary, (phenomenological) spectrum-generating mec hanism that arises in what seems to be a most unlikely way. We have found that an “analytic-continuation” [5] of a Hermi tian ma- trixF(op) representing the conventional fermion-number operator , from an external spacetime and Hilbert-space setting to a new internal (real) non- Euclidean space— F(op) is continued to a real, generally non-diagonal matrix F(v) involving a single realparameter v—“automatically” leads to a new de- scription of fundamental fermions (quarks and leptons) in w hich families are replicated and there are just threefamilies. The fact that this happens, sug- gests that there is some deep connection between the result o f the aforemen- tioned “analytic-continuation,” namely F(v), and Planck-level physics where flavor degrees-of-freedom, and family-replication, presu mably originate. The work presented here is based on a little-known book by the author [6] wherein many of the consequences of using F(v) to describe fundamental fermions, are worked out in much greater detail than in the pr esent paper. And, conversely, certain themes that were only alluded to in [6], such as the “analytic-continuation” F(op)→F(v), are discussed in much greater detail here. The author hopes that the following relatively brief “ overview” and extension of [6] will serve to increase awareness of these ne w ideas among particle physicists. 2.0 The Conventional Fermion-Number Operator Consider the situation, presumably at some high energy, whe re we are deal- ing with “free” (isolated) leptons or “analytically free” q uarks. Suppose we want to describe the scalar fermion-number carried by these particles. And, suppose further that the energies involved are not so high th at quantum field- theory (QFT) breaks down. Under these conditions the fermio n-number can be represented by a U(1)-type scalar “charge” [7, 8], namely, a charge asso- ciated with the (continuous) group of unitary matrices Uof order 1 known 2asU(1). The fermion-number operator, which can be represented by a H ermitian matrix F(op), is said to generate these so-called “gauge” (or phase) trans- formations, which in turn act on fermion and antifermion qua ntum states in Hilbert space. That is, given that αis arealphase one has U=eiαF(op), (1) and for infinitesimal transformations [i.e., ei δαF(op)= 1+i δαF(op)] acting on single-particle (free or “asymptotically free”) fermion a nd antifermion states |p/an}bracketri}htand|p/an}bracketri}ht, respectively, one easily establishes that (the fermion-n umber “charges” are fm=−fa= 1 for matter and fafor antimatter) U|p/an}bracketri}ht=ei δα f m|p/an}bracketri}ht U|p/an}bracketri}ht=ei δα f a|p/an}bracketri}ht,(2) since, by definition, F(op) obeys the eigenvalue equations F(op)|p/an}bracketri}ht=fm|p/an}bracketri}ht F(op)|p/an}bracketri}ht=fa|p/an}bracketri}ht.(3) Finally, the assumption that the Hamiltonian His invariant under U, namely H=UHU†, (4) ensures that HandF(op) commute [F(op), H] = 0, (5) as can be verified by differentiating UHU†with respect to α. Hence, the total fermion-number (the number of fermions minus the number of antifermions ) is a constant of the motion. 2.1 Matrix representation of the fermion-number op- erator Because the matrix F(op) involves just twokinds of quantum states (3), namely |p/an}bracketri}htand|p/an}bracketri}ht, it can be expressed as a 2 ×2 diagonal Hermitian matrix 3(see below), where one of the adjustable parameters ( θ) is a fixedconstant (up to 2 π) and the other ( φ) is freely adjustable . In particular, F(op) =/parenleftbiggcosθ sinθe−iφ sinθe+iφ−cosθ/parenrightbigg/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle cosθ=1=σz, (6) where σz=/parenleftbiggfm0 0fa/parenrightbigg (7) is one of the familiar Pauli matrices. This form for F(op) is consistent with (3) where the normalization and orthogonality conditions, namely /an}bracketle{tp|p/an}bracketri}ht=/an}bracketle{tp|p/an}bracketri}ht= 1 and /an}bracketle{tp|p/an}bracketri}ht=/an}bracketle{tp|p/an}bracketri}ht= 0, respectively, directly yield F(op) =/parenleftbigg /an}bracketle{tp|F(op)|p/an}bracketri}ht,/an}bracketle{tp|F(op)|p/an}bracketri}ht /an}bracketle{tp|F(op)|p/an}bracketri}ht,/an}bracketle{tp|F(op)|p/an}bracketri}ht/parenrightbigg =σz. (8) Note that owing to (7) and (8), cos θ <1 in (6) is excluded. Here it should also be noted that trF(op) = fm+fa= 0,detF(op) = fm·fa=−1, and F2(op) = I2is the 2 ×2 identity matrix. 3.0 The Continuation From F(op) to F( v) Now perform an “analytic continuation” [5] on F(op), namely F(op)→F(v), which maintains F(v)realand cos θ≥1. This can only be accomplished by continuing θfrom a realto an imaginary number, and by maintaining e−iφimaginary . In particular, to maintain F(v) real, we must make the replacements θ→ivande−iφ→ ∓i, where vis arealnumber. Then F(v) =/parenleftbiggcosθ sinθe−iφ sinθe+iφ−cosθ/parenrightbigg/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle θ=iv,e−iφ=∓i(9) or F(v) =/parenleftbiggcoshv±sinhv ∓sinhv−coshv/parenrightbigg , (10) where, just as for F(op) the eigenvalues of F(v) arefmandfa, and so we havetrF(v) =fm+fa= 0,detF(v) =fm·fa=−1, and F2(v) =I2. 4In [6, p. 50 and 54] it is shown that only the upper signs in (10) have physical significance and v≥0. And, just what is the physical significance ofF(v)? Because the continuation “connects” F(op) and F(v), it is natural to as- sume that both F(op) and F(v) describe, or represent, aspects of the fermion number (i.e., the matter-antimatter “degree-of-freedom” ). However, unlike F(op),F(v) will be shown to describe additional “degrees-of-freedom ” such as the “up”-“down” and quark-lepton “degrees-of-freedom. ” Moreover, it is abundantly clear from (10) that the the generally non-Her mitian (when v/ne}ationslash= 0) matrix F(v)—unlike the Hermitian matrix F(op) in (8), which acts on Hilbert space—does notact on a Hilbert space in an external spacetime setting [9]. 3.1 A new internal non-Euclidean space When the matrix F(v) acts on a real column-vector {a, b}, it leaves the quadratic form a2−b2, invariant. Therefore, the 2-space metric is non- Euclidean or “Lorentzian”, and can be represented by the mat rix g=/parenleftbigg 1 0 0−1/parenrightbigg . (11) Given this metric, the scalar product of two real vectors assumes the form (a, b){e, f}=ae−bf. (12) Similarly, the square of a real vector is given by (a, b){a, b}=a2−b2. (13) Here ( ,) is arowvector while {,}is a (conformable) column vector. Now let us demonstrate that these scalar-products transfor m like charges instead of probabilities as they would if we were still dealing with a Hilbert space. 3.2 Charge conjugation The matrix X, where X=X−1orX2=I2, given by X=/parenleftbigg 0 1/d d0/parenrightbigg , (14) 5transforms F(v) to is C-reversed counterpart. In particular, given that the components of F(v), in diagonal form [i.e., F(v)diag=σz], transform like (global) “charges” ( fmandfa), the general similarity transformation must be such that X F(v)X−1=−F(v), (15) foranyreald. However, since Xshould convert a real vector {a, b}to its orthogonal antimatter-counterpart X{a, b}={b/d, ad }, (16) we are forced to require (a, b){b/d, ad }= 0, (17) which means that ab/d−abd= 0, (18) ord2= 1. Therefore, we have two choices for d, namely, d=±1. Which one describes the physics of fundamental fermions? Clearly, when d=±1, the square of any vector, namely, (a, b){a, b}=a2−b2, (19) changes signs (is C-reversing) under X. However, in general, the components of a vector {a, b}do not change signs under X, i.e., they are not C-reversing. For example, when d= +1 in (14), the components of real vectors such as {a, b}arenotC-reversing charge-like quantities, which means that we can - not represent C-reversing (Lorentz 4-scalar) charges such as electric-ch arge, charm, isospin or beauty as components of such vectors when d= +1. How- ever, when d=−1, both the square of {a, b}andits components aandb change signs (are C-reversing) under X, and can be used to represent such charges. Therefore, from an experimental standpoint, d= +1 is excluded (see Ref. 6, p. 8). We conclude that the matrix X, which plays the role of charge-conjugation (with respect to these global 2-space charges only) in this n on-Euclidean 2- space, is proportional to one of the familiar Pauli matrices , namely, X=−σx. (20) 6The foregoing properties of the non-Euclidean charge-like scalars, leads to the following conjecture: The global (flavor-defining )charges associated with the aforementioned “ac- cidental” symmetries (see Section 1.0 ), and the global charges associated with the non-Euclidean 2-space, are (essentially )one and the same charges. As shown in the next section if this conjecture is true it mean s, among other things, that simultaneous fundamental-fermion flavo r eigenstates can be partially specified using an appropriate (mutually-comm uting) combina- tion of these (global) 2-space charges [10, 11]. 4.0 Representing Flavor Eigenstates and Flavor Dou- blets in the 2-Space The continuation from the 2-D Hilbert space to the 2-D non-Eu clidean “charge” space, turns out to mean that individual flavors of fundament al fermions can be partially represented in an unconventional way by geomet ric objects (in the non-Euclidean 2-space) which differ from a quantum state, but from which the quantum states can be inferred or effectively const ructed . In par- ticular, in the non-Euclidean 2-space, an object we call a “v ector triad” represents “up”-“ down” type flavor doublets of fundamental fermions—the “up”-“down” type flavor dichotomy. That is, the components o f the vec- tors associated with a given vector-triad are observable (Lorentz 4-scalar) “charges,” which can be used to (partially) define the two flav or-eigenstates in a flavor doublet [10, 11]. 4.1 Flavor eigenstates As demonstrated in detail in [6, pp. 16–18], given the charge -like (C-reversing) observables associated with the description involving F(v), namely, the real C-reversing scalar-components of various matrices and vect ors defined on the internal non-Euclidean 2-space, it is possible to write dow n flavor eigenstates [10, 11]. What one does is to identify the mutually-commuting C-reversing “charges” (call them Ci) or charge-like quantum numbers associated with a particul ar flavor, and then write the corresponding simultaneous flavor -eigenstate as |C1, C2, C3, . . . , C n/an}bracketri}ht. (21) 7HereC1, C2, C3, . . . , C n, are the “good” charge-like quantum numbers (charges) associated with a particular flavor. It happens that these observable real- numbers can be identified with quantum numbers such as electric charge, strangeness, charm , the third-component of (global) isospin, truth and beauty (See Ref. 6, p. 72). To discover what charges describe a parti cular flavor we must first identify the vector-triad associated with that fla vor. Now, each vector-triad represents a flavor doublet, not just an individual flavor. That is, vector-triads provide information on twoquantum states (simultaneous flavor-eigenstates) associated with flavor d oublets. Therefore, vector-triads represent both individual flavors andflavor doublets. Here we simply summarize how it is the that non-Euclidean vector-tr iads represent bothindividual flavors and “up”-“down” type flavor-doublets . 4.2 Flavor doublets Consider the eigenvector (call it Q) ofF(v) for fundamental fermions [12]. Since the space on which F(v) “acts” is two-dimensional, the observable vector Qcan be “resolved” into two (no more or less) observable , linearly- independent vectors, call them UandV, asQ=U+V[13]. Now, because these three vectors ( Q,U, andV) aresimultaneous observables, it makes sense to speak of this “triad” of vectors as being a well define d geometric object, namely, a “vector triad.” Recognizing that the components of Q,UandVareC-reversing charge- likeobservables we can write these observable “charge” vectors as Q={q1, q2} (22) U={u1, u2} (23) V={v1, v2}, (24) where q1,q2,u1,u2,v1andv2are the various observable “charges” (e.g., q1andq2are found to be electric charges). Given Q=U+V, the non- Euclidean metric (11), and Eqs. (22) through (24), we find the associated observable quadratic-“charges” Q2=U2+ 2U•V+V2(25) 2U•V= 2(u1v1−u2v2) (26) U2=u2 1−u2 2 (27) V2=v2 1−v2 2. (28) 8Finally, using the foregoing charges, we can express the twoquantum states (simultaneous flavor-eigenstates) associated with a single vector-triad in the form of “ket”vectors as follows (Ref. 6, pp. 16–18) |q1, u1, v1,Q2,U2,2U•V,V2/an}bracketri}ht, |q2, u2, v2,Q2,U2,2U•V,V2/an}bracketri}ht.(29) Here, the state |q1, u1, v1,Q2,U2,2U•V,V2/an}bracketri}htrepresents the “up”-type flavor- eigenstate, and |q2, u2, v2,Q2,U2,2U•V,V2/an}bracketri}htrepresents the corresponding “down”- type flavor-eigenstate in a flavor doublet of fundame ntal fermions [10, 11]. Up to this point in the discussion we have shown that the 2-spa ce de- scription naturally incorporates the matter-antimatter d ichotomy and the “up”-“down” flavor dichotomy. Now let us demonstrate how qua rks and leptons are incorporated in the new description. 4.3 Distinguishing quarks and leptons Choosing the upper signs in (10), the matrix F(v) becomes F(v) =/parenleftbigg coshvsinhv −sinhv−coshv/parenrightbigg , (30) where vis a positive real number [6, p. 50 and 54]. As described in [6, pp. 52–55], the parameter vdistinguishes between quarks andleptons . In particular, the parameter vis found to be quantized and obeys the “quantum condition”: v= lnMc, (31) where Mccounts both the number of fundamental fermions in a strongly- bound composite fermion, and the strong-color multiplicity . That is, Mc= 3 for quarks (strong-color triplets) and Mc= 1 for leptons (strong-color singlets). 4.3.1 Quark and lepton electric charges It is shown in (Ref. 6, pp. 52–55, and Ref. 12) that the quark an d lepton electric charges are the “up”-“down” components of the eige nvectors of the 9matrix F(v). In particular, the quark charges are given by ( Mc= 3) q1(f) =(M2 c−1) 2Mc(Mc−f)= +2 3forf= +1 and +1 3forf=−1 (32) q2(f) = q1(f)−1. (33) Similarly, the lepton electric charges are given by ( Mc= 1) q′ 1(f) =−(M2 c−1) 2Mc(Mc−f)=−1 forf= +1 and 0 for f=−1 (34) q′ 2(f) = q′ 1(f) + 1. (35) In summary, F(v) is found to provide an explanation for the quark-lepton “dichotomy” of fundamental fermions in addition to the matt er-antimatter, and “up”-“ down” type flavor-dichotomy. 4.4 Family replication and the number of families In [6, pp. 59–65] it is shown that flavor doublets (hence famil ies) are replicated and that there are only three families of quarks and leptons. We refer the reader to [6] for a full and detailed account. Here we simply o utline how this situation comes about. By the definition of a linear-vector 2-space, a 2-vector such asQcan always be resolved into a pair (no more, or less) of linearly- independent vectors UandVasQ=U+V(see Sec. 4.2). And, since Qrepresents a flavor doublet, so should UandVrepresent thissame flavor doublet. But, if this is so, different vector-resolutions of Q(i.e., different vector-triads ) should correspond to different flavor-doublets having the sa meQ. In other words, flavor doublets should be replicated . SinceQcan be resolved (mathematically) in an infinite number of way s, we might suppose that there are an infinite number of flavor doublets, and hence, families. But, because of various “quantum constrai nts,” it is possible to show that Qcan be resolved in only three physically acceptable ways for Q-vectors associated with either quarks or leptons . In other words, there can be only six quark flavors and six lepton flavors, which leads to the (ex post facto)“prediction” of three quark-lepton families. 105.0 Discussion It is important to understand that the new 2-space descripti on of fundamental fermions (quarks and leptons) provides a distinction betwe en these particles that goes beyond differences that can be explained by mass diff erences alone. For example, in the standard model the only difference betwee n an electron and a muon is that they have different masses. Otherwise, thes e particles experience identical electroweak interactions. Moreover , as described in Sec- tion 1.0, the separate conservation of electron- and muon-n umbers can be attributed to certain unavoidable “accidental symmetries ” associated with the (renormalizable) lagrangian describing the (electrow eak) interactions of these particles. Taken at face value, these accidental symmetries would seem to imply that there are no internal “wheels and gears” that would dist inguish an elec- tron from a muon, for example. But, if the string theories are correct, these particles would be associated with different “handles” on th e compactified space [see Ref. 3, Vol. 2, p. 408], and so would be different in t hisadditional sense. Likewise, in the present non-Euclidean 2-space desc ription, a variety of (global) 2-scalars, which are only indirectly related to the accidental sym- metries of the lagrangian, serve to provide a (further) dist inction between particles such as the electron and muon (see also the conject ure in Sec. 3.2). A probable experimental signal of such “internal” differenc es is to be found in the recent observations at the Super Kamiokande of b i-maximal neutrino mixing [14]. Models which begin by positing a neutr ino mass-matrix and associated mixing-parameters, such as the three-gener ation model pro- posed by Georgi and Glashow [15], do a good job of describing t he observa- tions. However, bi-maximal mixing may have a deeper explana tion in terms of internal topological-differences (in the non-Euclidean 2-space) between νe, andνµorντneutrinos. With respect to the internal transformation F(v), the topology of the non-Euclidean “vector triad” (see Sec. 4.2) representing t heνe(νµorντ), is found to be that of a cylinder (M¨ obius strip). And, assumi ng that a change in topology during neutrino mixing is suppressed by e nergy “barri- ers,” or other topological “barriers” (e.g., one cannot con tinuously deform a doughnut into a sphere), while neutrino mixing without top ology-change is (relatively) enhanced, one can readily explain the exper imental observa- tion of (nearly) maximal νµ−ντneutrino mixing—at least maximal νµ−ντ mixing over long distances, where the foregoing topologica l influences would 11be cumulative [16]. If this explanation is basically correc t, then it follows that the neutrino mass-matrix and associated mixing-param eters needed to explain bi-maximal neutrino mixing, would be the result, at least in part, of these deeper (internal) topological differences between neutrinos, and not theircause. 6.0 Conclusions It is widely believed that the explanation for fundamental- fermion (quark and lepton) family replication is to be found in theories of q uantum gravity (e.g., superstrings). And, yet, as demonstrated here and el sewhere [6], a sim- ple “analytic continuation” of a Hermitian matrix represen ting the fermion- number operator, leads to a new, and unconventional, internal description of quarks andleptons , which also explains family replication. In particular, th is description, unlike the conventional standard-model desc ription, is capable of explaining, among other things, the fact that there are ju stthreeobserved families of quarks and leptons. We take these facts to be evid ence that the (phenomenological) “analytic continuation” F(op)→F(v), or at least the result of the continuation F(v), somehow reflects physics at the Planck level where flavor degrees-of-freedom presumably originate. It seems that the best chance to show that F(v) and Planck-level physics are related, lies in an appropriate application of superstr ing theory. Accord- ingly, the author hopes that the new description of families presented here (see also Refs. 6 and 16) will encourage string theorists wor king on so-called realistic (free-fermionic) three-generation string mode ls (e.g., see Refs. 17, 18), to take up the challenge of showing that these models eit her do, or do not, justify the new description. 7.0 References and Footnotes [1] S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I, Foundations , Cambridge University Press, New York, NY (1995), pp. 529–53 1;The Quan- tum Theory of Fields, Vol. II, Modern Applications , Cambridge University Press, New York, NY (1996), p. 155. [2] J. M. Maldacena, “Gravity, Particle Physics and Their Un ification,” [hep–ph/0002092]. [3] M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten, Superstring Theory, Vol. 1 and 2 , Cambridge University Press, 1987. 12[4] N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dinopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett., B429 ,263 (1998) and [hep–ph/9803315]. [5] Ruel V. Churchill, Complex Variables and Applications , McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, NY (1960), pp. 259–268. The ter m “analytic continuation” usually refers to an individual analytic fun ction. However, we are dealing here with the “analytic continuation” of a 2 by 2 matrix F(op) whose components are four different, but closely related, an alytic functions (±cosθ,sinθe±iφ). Because the term “analytic continuation” has a precise mathematical meaning, and because we would prefer to avoid c onfusion with well-established mathematical terminology, we will relax this precision in fa- vor of the term “continuation” (without quotes) or “analyti c continuation” (with quotes) whenever we refer to the continuation or “anal ytic continua- tion” of the matrix F(op). [6] Gerald L. Fitzpatrick, The Family Problem-New Internal Algebraic and Geometric Regularities , Nova Scientific Press, Issaquah, WA (1997). Addi- tional information: http://physicsweb.org/TIPTOP/ or http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0965569500. I n spite of the many successes of the standard model of particle physics, th e observed prolif- eration of matter-fields, in the form of “replicated” genera tions or families, is a major unsolved problem. In this book I propose a new organiz ing principle for fundamental fermions, i.e., a minimalistic “extension ” of the standard model based, in part, on the Cayley-Hamilton theorem for mat rices. In par- ticular, to introduce (internal) global degrees of freedom that are capable of distinguishing all observed flavors, I use the Cayley-Ham ilton theorem to generalize the familiar standard-model concept of scalar f ermion-numbers f (i.e.,fm= +1 for all fermions and fa=−1 for all antifermions). This the- orem states that every (square )matrix satisfies its characteristic equation . Hence, if fmandfaare taken to be the eigenvalues of some real matrix F(v)— a “generalized fermion number”—it follows from this theore m that both f andF(v) are square-roots of unity. Assuming further that the compo nents of both F(v) and its eigenvectors are global charge-like quantum obser v- ables, and that F(v) “acts” on a (real) vector 2-space, both the form of F(v) and the 2-space metric are determined. I find that the 2-space has a non- Euclidean or “Lorentzian” metric, and that various associa ted 2-scalars serve as global flavor-defining “charges,” which can be identified w ith charges such as strangeness, charm, baryon and lepton numbers etc.. Henc e, these global charges can be used to describe individual flavors (i.e., flav or eigenstates), flavor doublets and families. Moreover, because of the afore mentioned non- 13Euclidean constraints, and certain standard-model constr aints, I find that these global charges are effectively- “quantized” in such a w ay that families are replicated. Finally, because these same constraints di ctate that there are only a limited number of values these charges can assume, I fin d that families always come in “threes.” [7] J. Bernstein, Elementary Particles and Their Currents , W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco (1968), pp. 23–25. [8] T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory Vol. I , Harwood Academic Publishers, New York, NY (1981), pp. 210–2 11. [9] Even though F(v)diag=F(op) = σz, these two matrices act on entirely different spaces, since F(op) is associated with the constant cosθ= 1, and thevariable phase-factor e−iφ, whereas F(v) is associated with the variable cosθ≥1, and the constant phase-factor e+iφ= +i. [10] When weak interactions are “turned off” flavor eigenstat es and mass eigenstates are one and the same. For the most part, when we sp eak here of flavor eigenstates, we are referring to the situation where fl avor- and mass- eigenstates are the same. [11] Strictly speaking, besides the specification of global charges, the over- all quantum state of a fundamental fermion would, necessari ly, involve a spec- ification of the spin state, the energy-momentum state and so on, together with a specification of the particular mix of local color (gau ge)-charges R, W,B,GandYcarried by each fundamental fermion. This color-mix would be determined, in turn, by a complementary, local SU(5) color-dependent gauge description. [12] Any acceptable 2 ×2 matrix F(v) possesses just two,reallinearly- independent eigenvectors, call them QandQc, corresponding to the two realeigenvalues fmandfa, respectively. Therefore, the matrix F(v) can be thought of as “producing” the conventional single-particl e fermion numbers fmandfavia the 2-space eigenvalue equations F(v)Q=fmQ and F(v)Qc=faQc, respectively. The 2-vector Q(and its scalar components—the electric charges of quarks and leptons) describes matter , while the linearly-independent 2-vector Qc 14describes its antimatter counterpart. The superscript conQcis merely a label signifying antimatter. It is not an exponent or a symbo l for complex conjugation. As such, it signifies only that the2-vectors QandQcare real vectors associated with (“carried by ,” “representing ,”etc.)individual fundamental-fermions or antifermions, respectively , not state vectors in some Hilbert space. Even though the 2-vector Q(Qc) does not represent a quantum state, it is associated with the phase factor eiα fm(ei α f a) associated with a quantum state describing matter (antimatter). To see this, replace F(op) in Eq. 1 in the main text by F(v). Then Uis replaced by U′where U′Q=ei α f mQ and U′Qc=ei α f aQc. Note that because ei n(δα)F(v)=ei αF(v)when nis very large and δαis very small, but nonzero (i.e., n δα=α),αcan be any finite number ranging from zero to infinity. Similar arguments apply to the matrix UsinceU(α)·U(α′) = U(α+α′). [13] When we say that the vectors Q,UandVareobservables , we mean that their associated component-“charges” are mutually-c ommuting simulta- neous observables. Hence, all of these charge-like compone nts can be known in principle, at the same time, meaning that the vectors Q,UandVcan be known simultaneously. [14] T. Kajita, for the Super-Kamiokande, Kamiokande Colla boration, [hep–ex/9810001]. [15] H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, “Neutrinos on Earth and in th e Heav- ens,” [hep–ph/9808293]. [16] G. L. Fitzpatrick, “Topological Constraints on Long-D istance Neu- trino Mixtures,” [aps1999feb12 001] available at: http://publish.aps.org/eprint/ [17] A. E. Faraggi, “Towards the Classification of the Realis tic Free Fermion Models,” [hep-th/9708112]. [18] G. B. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, D. V. Nanopoulos and T. ter V eldhuis, “Towards String Predictions,” [hep-ph/0002292]. 15

arXiv:physics/0007039v1 [physics.gen-ph] 13 Jul 2000Presented at the APS Centennial Meeting March 23, 1999, Atla nta, Georgia; Session no. LB08. Available as an APS e-print at http://publish.aps.org/eprint/. Paper number: aps1999f eb12001. Topological Constraints on Long-Distance Neutrino Mixtures Gerald L. Fitzpatrick PRI Research and Development Corp. 12517 131 Ct. NE Kirkland, WA 98034 pri@halcyon.com Abstract A new internal description of fundamental fermions (quarks and lep- tons), based on a matrix-generalization ( F) of the scalar fermion- number f, predicts that only three families of quarks and leptons, an d their associated neutrinos ( νe,νµandντ), exist. Moreover, this de- scription places important topological constraints on neu trino mixing. For example, with respect to F, the topology of the νe(νµorντ) is that of a cylinder (M¨ obius strip). Assuming that a change in topo logy dur- ing neutrino-neutrino transitions is suppressed (e.g., on e cannot con- tinuously deform a donut into a sphere), while neutrino-neu trino tran- sitions without topology-change are (relatively) enhance d, one may have an explanation for recent short-distance experimenta l observa- tions of (nearly) maximal νµ-ντmixing at the Super Kamiokande. To test this idea, I was able to use simple topological argument s to deduce a matrix describing long-distance neutrino mixtures, whic h isidentical to that proposed by Georgi and Glashow on different grounds. E x- perimental confirmation of this prediction would strongly s upport the new description of fundamental fermions, which requires, a mong other things, that the νeand (νµorντ) neutrinos start life as topologically- distinct quantum objects. 11.0 Introduction Except where explicitly prevented by some “absolute” conse rvation law (e.g., the conservation of electric charge or spin angular momentu m), quantum me- chanics generally permits transitions between states havi ngdifferent topolo- gies [1]. While a change in topology may be energetically (or otherwise) inhibited, unavoidable quantum fluctuations are expected t o catalyze such processes. Hence, there is always the possibility of mixing between otherwise similar states having distinct topologies [2]. Recently, a new internal description of fundamental fermio ns (quarks and leptons) was proposed [3]. The new description is based o n a matrix- generalization Fof the scalar fermion number f. One of the main predictions of the new description is that only three families of quarks a nd leptons exist— hence that there are only three low-mass neutrino flavors, na mely, the νe,νµ andντneutrinos. Moreover, because of the way fundamental fermio ns are represented by certain geometric objects in the space on whi ch the matrix transformation Facts [Ref. 3, p. 57 and pp. 85–87, Ref. 4, 5 and Ref. 6, pp. 244–255], the νeand (νµorντ) neutrinos are found to have different topolo- gies with respect to F. This fact turns out to have important implications for neutrino mixing. With respect to the matrix transformation F, the topology of both the νµandντis found to be that of a M¨ obius strip [Ref. 6, p. 143]. By contr ast, the topology of the νe(with respect F) is that of a cylinder. And because a change in topology during transitions tends to be suppresse d (e.g., one cannot continuously deform a donut into a sphere) the foregoing top ological distinc- tions between neutrinos may help explain recent experiment al observations of (nearly) maximal νµ-ντmixing at the Super Kamiokande facility [7]. The purpose of this paper is to determine the constraints that th ese topological distinctions place on long-distance neutrino mixtures, an d by implication, short-distance neutrino mixtures as well. 2.0 Topological Constraints on Neutrino Mix- tures In all conventional weak transitions, including neutral-c urrent weak transi- tions, the e µandτquantum numbers are additively conserved. Although the observed neutrino mixing [7] violates these conservati on laws, all transi- 2tions of neutrinos from one flavor to another (i.e., νl→νl′,l/ne}ationslash=l′) will tend to be suppressed. In this paper we implicitly assume that thi s degree, and kind, of suppression is the same for all νl→νl′, and therefore, that this effect can be completely ignored when discussing (relative) topological constraints placed on long-distance neutrino mixtures. 2.1 Additional constraints on the matrix M Given that the νe(νµorντ) neutrino has the topology of a cylinder (M¨ obius strip) with respect to the internal transformation F, and assuming that topo- logical constraints are the primary determinants of the matrix Mdescribing long-distance neutrino mixtures, the form ofMis easily determined [8]. Moreover, these same topological constraints can be used to place numerical bounds on the components of M. To accomplish these results we need only apply the following very general principle to neutrino-neu trino transitions: All other things being equal, any neutrino flavor νl,(i.e.,νe,νµorντ) that undergoes neutrino-neutrino transitions involving a change in topology, will tend to be suppressed, while neutrino-neutrino transi tions involving no change in topology will tend to be (relatively )enhanced. To this principle we add the following corollary, All other things being equal, because the νµandντhave the same topology, they will act the same way in all neutrino-neutrino transiti ons. Given these principles, we immediately have the following t wo constraints on long-distance neutrino mixtures: A. No matter what neutrino flavor ( νl) and topology one starts with at some distant source (say a supernova), by the time the neutri no mixture reaches its “equilibrium” state, it should contain equal fractions of νµand ντ, because these neutrinos have the same topology. B. Because the νµandντhave the same topology, if one starts out with either a pure νµora pure ντsource, one should end up with the same long-distance equilibrium mixture of νe,νµandντ. To describe A) and B) in conventional terms [9], let Dlbe the number of detected neutrinos of type νlandBlbe their number at “birth” at some distant source. Then {De, Dµ, Dτ}=M{Be, Bµ, Bτ}, (1) 3where Mis a 3×3 matrix of fractional coefficients describing the long-dist ance neutrino mixture, and {, ,}are column “vectors”. By definition, all rows and columns of Mmust sum to unity (100%), which means that DlandBl must satisfy the constraint De+Dµ+Dτ=Be+Bµ+Bτ. (2) 2.2 The form of the matrix M Constraints A) and B), together with Eqs. (1) and (2), dictat e that the matrix Mdescribing long-distance neutrino mixtures must have the s ymmetrical form  De Dµ Dτ = a b b b c c b c c  Be Bµ Bτ . (3) While topological constraints alone cannot determine the e xact numerical values of the matrix elements a,bandc, they can place numerical bounds on these quantities. For example, because the νeisinhibited by its topology from turning into a νµorντ, we naturally expect that (See Fig. 2.1) a≥b. (4) Similarly, because the νµand/or the ντareinhibited by their topology from turning into a νe, we naturally expect that (See Fig. 2.1) c≥b. (5) Equations (4) and (5), together with the requirement that al l rows and columns of the matrix Min (1) and (3) sum to unity (i.e., a+2b=b+2c= 1), further leads to the following bounds on a,bandc: (1 3≤a≤1),(0≤b≤1 3),(1 3≤c≤1 2). (6) Moreover, since a+ 2b=b+ 2c, the arithmetic mean of aandbisc, i.e., (a+b)/2 =c, which means that clies half-way between aandb. Hence, the matrix elements a,bandcare subject to the constraint a≥c≥b. (7) 4Transitions without Transitions with topology change topology change (5 matrix elements) (4 matrix elements) νµ− →νµνe− →νea c ντ− →νµνµ− →ντντ− →ντνµ− →νebνe− →ντνe− →νµ ντ− →νe Figure 2.1. Matrix elements a,bandcdescribing long-distance neutrino mixtures [see Eq. (3)]. Neutrino-neutrino transitions without topology change are “preferred” relative to neutrino-neut rino transitions in- volving a change in topology. That is, the matrix elements aandcare both greater than b. The symbol ( ) for a cylinder (M¨ obius strip) is used to represent the topology of the νe(νµorντ) with respect to the internal transformation F. Note that the matrix elements bandcare unaffected by an exchange of the subscripts µandτ. Equations (1) and (3) determine the general form ofM, while (6) places bounds on its components, whose relative magnitudes are further constrained by (7). Finally, because rows and columns of Msum to unity, Mmay be ex- pressed in terms of the single parameter aas M(a) =1 4 4a, 2(1−a),2(1−a) 2(1−a),(1 +a),(1 +a) 2(1−a),(1 +a),(1 +a) . (8) 2.3 The Georgi-Glashow matrix M(1 2) TheformofMspecified in (3) and (8), together with the constraints provi ded by (6) and (7), are completely consistent with the matrix pro posed by Georgi 5and Glashow [9] to describe long-distance neutrino mixture s, namely, M(1 2) =1 8 4 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 . (9) This matrix can be viewed in two different, but apparently com plementary, ways as being 1) The direct result of an assumed form for the neutrino mass- matrix (and associated mixing parameters), and other factors dictated by requiring consistency with the standard-model description of neutri nos, including all known experimental properties of neutrinos. This is the point of view espoused in [9], and/or 2) The result of a balance between opposing topological and q uantum “forces” acting on neutrinos. This is the point of view espou sed in the present paper. If 1) and 2) above are to be compatible points of view, then it f ollows that such things as the neutrino mass-matrix is, in some sens e, the result of an interplay between opposing topological and quantum “for ces” acting on neutrinos. This conclusion would gain support if it were pos sible to derive the matrix Mwithout reference to the approach taken in [9]. Such a deriva tion is presented in Section 3.0. But, before turning to the deriv ation of M, we must first examine the boundary conditions on this matrix. 2.4 Boundary conditions on M(a) Consider the general matrix M(a) defined on the boundaries of the physically accessible region (1 3≤a≤1). When a=a1 3=1 3(See Eq. 8 and Ref. 10) M(1 3) =1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . (10) In this case, topological constraints are effectively nonex istent—topology change in neutrino-neutrino transitions is completely unrestricted (a=b= 6a0/parenleftigg “Forces” acting to oppose topology-change/parenrightigg /parenleftigg “Forces” catalyzing topology-change, i.e., quantum fluctuations/parenrightiggM(a1 3)M(a1) a1= 1 a1 3=1 3 (Unrestricted topology change)(No topology change) M(a0) Figure 2.2. The balance between opposing quantum and topolo gi- cal “forces”. The parameter avaries from a1 3=1 3(no effective topological constraints on neutrino mixing) to a1= 1 (maximal topological-constraints in neutrino mixing). The shaded regions are physically inac cessible. Owing to unavoidable quantum-fluctuations, the “forces” acting t o oppose topology- change are, themselves opposed, by quantum “forces” acting to catalyze topology-change. These two opposing “forces” must seek a st able “equi- librium” at some point a=a0located between a1 3anda1. Thus the matrix M(a0) represents a “balance” between the extreme conditions M(a1 3) and M(a1). c=1 3). That is, quantum fluctuations, which act to catalyze topol ogy- change, are completely dominant when a=1 3. Figure 2.2 illustrates the situation. When a=a1= 1 (See Eq. 8 and Ref. 10) M(1) =1 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 . (11) In this case, topological constraints are maximal—topolog y-change in neutrino- neutrino transitions is completely prevented (a= 1, b= 0, c=1 2). That is, quantum fluctuations, which would otherwise catalyze topol ogy-change, are effectively overwhelmed by topological energy (or other top ological) “barri- ers” when a= 1. Figure 2.2 illustrates the situation. 7Now, because of (8, 10 and 11), any matrix M(a) defined on the interval (1 3≤a≤1) can be written as a function of the single parameter aas M(a) =3 2(1−a)M(1 3) +3 2(a−1 3)M(1) (12) where3 2(1−a) +3 2(a−1 3) = 1. (13) Clearly, the fractions3 2(1−a) and3 2(a−1 3), determine the fraction of M(a), which depends on the topology-changing piece M(1 3) and the topology-main- taining piece M(1), respectively. In the case of the Georgi-Glashow matrix in (9) we find M(1 2) =3 4M(1 3) +1 4M(1). (14) Presumably, this particular three-to-one “mixture” of M(1 3) and M(1), re- spectively, represents the equilibrium condition between opposing topology- changing and topology-maintaining “forces”, respectivel y. 3.0 A Simple Calculation of a,bandc. According to (3) and (8) the matrix elements a,bandcare given by a=a b=1 2(1−a) c=1 4(1 +a)  .(15) Focus attention on the pair of matrix elements aandb, which bracket c. Now, topology-changing “forces” (quantum fluctuations) consta ntly “attempt” to maximize bat the expense of a(andc), while at the same time, topology- maintaining “forces” (energy barriers ?) constantly “atte mpt” to maximize a(andc) at the expense of b(See Figures 2.1 and 2.2). Since aandbarebothfunctions of a, a “compromise” between these op- posing “forces” should be reached when the product f(a) =abismaximized [11] with respect to variations of a. From (15) one has f(a) =1 2a(1−a), (16) 8which possesses a maximum at a value of aequal to the harmonic mean [12] of the boundary values a1 3anda1(See Fig. 2.2), namely, a0=2a1 3·a1 a1 3+a1=1 2. (17) And,this value of ais precisely the value required to yield the Georgi-Glashow matrix M(1 2) of (9). However, one other conceivable solution for a0exists. The function g(a) =abcalso possesses a maximum , which occurs at a value of aequal to the geometric mean of the boundary values a1 3anda1 (See Fig. 2), namely, a0=/radicaliga1 3·a1=√ 3 3= 0.577. (18) Equations (17) and (18) represent the onlyphysically acceptable solutions involving extremal functions that depend on simple product s of the matrix elements a,bandc(i.e.,ab,bc,acandabc). For example, while the function h(a) =b·cpossesses a maximum , this occurs at a value of aequal to zero, which point lies outside the physically acceptable region ( a1 3≤a≤a1). And, the function i(a) =a·cpossesses a minimum instead of a maximum. Moreover, this occurs at an “unphysica l” value of a, namely, a0=−1 2. In summary, without further constraints, (17) and (18) woul d seem to be equally likely solutions. Is there some way to decide which s olution nature should choose? 3.1 Discussion Three reasons can be cited in favor of (17) and M(1 2). These are 1. From the standpoint of simplicity andparsimony thequadratic f(a) = abis obviously simpler and more parsimonious than the cubic g(a) = a·b·c. For example, the quadratic is symmetrical about its maximu m, while the cubic is asymmetrical about its maximum. The funct ionf(a) is also simpler and more parsimonious than g(a), in the sense that g(a) hastwofactors aandcthat describe the effect of topology-maintaining “forces”, while f(a) has only onesuch factor a. Hence, for reasons of simplicity and parsimony, (17) and M(1 2) are favored over (18) and M(0.577), respectively. 92. From [9] the matrix M(1 2) is known to be consistent with a reasonable form for the neutrino mass-matrix and associated mixing-pa rameters. The choice of (18) and M(0.577) would require changes in these quan- tities that may, or may not, be consistent with the presently known experimental properties of neutrinos. Hence, (17) and M(1 2) appear to be favored for this reason over (18) and M(0.577), respectively. 3. In Appendix A we present a crude “derivation” of the matrix Mbased on a harmonic-oscillator description of the balance betwee n topological and quantum “forces.” This description also seems to favor ( 17) and M(1 2) over (18) and M(0.577), respectively. It is remarkable that, in the absence of an in-depth understa nding of topology-maintaining and topology-changing “forces” (Se e Fig. 2.2), it has nevertheless proven possible to obtain an exact calculation (see qualifying re- marks above) of the matrix elements a,bandc, which describe long-distance neutrino mixtures. This apparent success strongly support s the main premise of this paper, which is that topological constraints play a major role in de- scribing both short- and long-distance neutrino mixtures. 4.0 Conclusions Topological constraints appear to play a major role in deter mining the na- ture of both short- and long-distance neutrino mixtures. Gi ven that the νe and (νµorντ) neutrinos have distinct topologies, and assuming that top ol- ogy changes are suppressed in neutrino-neutrino transitio ns, while neutrino- neutrino transitions without topology-change are relativ ely enhanced–one easily determines both the form of the matrix describing lon g-distance neu- trino mixtures, and even fixes the numerical magnitudes of th e individual ma- trix elements. If the predicted matrix (9), or one close to it [i.e.,M(0.577)], is eventually confirmed by observations of neutrinos from di stant astronom- ical sources, this will strongly support the new descriptio n of fundamental fermions, which requires, among other things, that the νeand (νµorντ) neutrinos start life as topologically-distinct quantum ob jects [3–5]. 105.0 Appendix A. A Toy Model for Calculat- ingM(a0). Imagine that the parameter adescribes a dynamical “system” associated with neutrino-neutrino mixtures. In particular, this system ha s asingle degree of freedom (is constrained to move on a straight line), which is further bounded bya1anda1 3(a1 3≤a≤a1). Treating aas a kind of “generalized coordinate” we are led to consider the “generalized forces” acting on the “system” and to determine its equilibrium “position” a0(See Fig. 2.2). Quantum fluctuations, in effect, “force” the “system,” as described by afrom the value a=a1 toward a=a1 3. At the same time, topological energy (or other topological ) “barriers” effectively “force” the system as described by a, from the value a= a1 3toward a=a1. These two opposing “forces” must reach a compromise, i.e.,stable equilibrium , at some value a(call it a0), which lies somewhere between a1 3anda1. This value ( a0) we take to describe long-distance neutrino mixtures via the matrix M(a0). To calculate a0, let us model the “system” using a simple (classical) harmonic-oscillator “potential” (See Ref. 13 and Figure A. 1), V(x) =k 2x2, (A1) where the Hooke’s-law “restoring force” is F=−kx=−∂V(x) ∂x, (A2) andx= (a−a0) is the “displacement” of the system from its (stable) equi- librium “position” a=a0. From (A1) we have ∂V(x) ∂x=k(a−a0). (A3) Clearly, if k(a−a0) were known on each boundary, then kanda0could be calculated. To do this, note first that ∂V(x)/∂xmust be a number with the “units” of a(assuming kis dimensionless). And, since the only number available to describe the system on the boundary of a, isaitself, we make the following assumptions ∂V(x) ∂x/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle a1=k(a1−a0) = +a1;a1> a0 (A4) 11V(a1) a1= 1F(a1 3) = −∂V(a) ∂a/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle a1 3 =−2(a1 3−a0) a1 3=1 3a0=1 2V(a) = (a−a0)2 V(a1 3) =/parenleftbigga1 3 a1/parenrightbigg2 V(a1)V(a)F(a1) =−∂V(a) ∂a/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle a1=−2(a1−a0) Figure A1. The “potential” V(a)describing the opposing quantum and topological “forces”. These “forces” balance one another at the (stable) equilibrium position a0. Here, k= 2,V(x) =k 2x2= (a−a0)2, and the “restoring force” is F(a) =−2(a−a0). ∂V(x) ∂x/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle a1 3=k(a1 3−a0) =−a1 3;a1 3< a0. (A5) From (A4) and (A5) we can easily deduce the unknowns kanda0. One finds k=(a1+a1 3) (a1−a1 3)= 2, (A6) and a0=2(a1 3·a1) (a1 3+a1)=1 2. (A7) Bothkanda0depend only on the values of aon the boundaries. In particular, a0is found to be the harmonic mean ofa1 3=1 3anda1= 1. 126.0 References and Footnotes [1] A. P. Balachandran, “Bringing Up a Quantum Baby,” quant- ph/9702055. [2] G. Holzwarth, “Formation of Extended Topological-Defe cts During Symmetry- Breaking Phase Transitions in O(2) and O(3) Models”, hep-ph/9901296. Analogous examples of fluctuation-induced topology-chang e in macroscopic objects (e.g., destruction of topological objects due to th ermal fluctuations at phase transitions) abounds. For example, otherwise persis tent (“conserved”) topological defects in crystals can be destroyed by raising the temperature sufficiently (i.e., by melting the crystal). Similarly, othe rwise persistent (“conserved”) magnetic flux-tubes in Type II superconductors and/or vor- ticesin a superfluid, can both be destroyed by raising the temperat ure above the critical temperature Tc. And, conversely, topological defects are always created when such macroscopic systems first condense (or cry stallize) as the temperature is lowered. We imagine that something roughly s imilar can hap- pen when quantum-fluctuations (vacuum fluctuations) act on o therwise very similar quantum states (i.e., same charge, spin and nearly i dentical mass) that also happen to start life as distinct topological-obje cts. That is, we are assuming that, if not prevented by some conservation law , transitions between such states (e.g., νeandνµneutrinos) will be catalyzed by quantum fluctuations. [3] Gerald L. Fitzpatrick, The Family Problem-New Internal Algebraic and Geometric Regularities , Nova Scientific Press, Issaquah, Washington, 1997. Additional information: http://physicsweb.org/TIPTOP/ or http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0965569500 . In spite of the many successes of the standard model of particle physics, th e observed prolif- eration of matter-fields, in the form of “replicated” genera tions or families, is a major unsolved problem. In this book a new organizing princ iple for funda- mental fermions is proposed, i.e., a minimalistic “extensi on” of the standard model based, in part, on the Cayley-Hamilton theorem for mat rices. To in- troduce (internal) global degrees of freedom that are capab le of distinguishing all observed flavors, the Cayley-Hamilton theorem is used to generalize the familiar standard-model concept of scalar fermion-number sf(i.e.,fm= +1 for all fermions and fa=−1 for all antifermions). This theorem states that every (square) matrix satisfies its characteristic equatio n. Hence, if fmandfa are taken to be the eigenvalues of some real matrix F(a “generalized fermion 13number”), it follows from this theorem that both fandFare square-roots of unity. Assuming further that the components of both Fand its eigen- vectors are global charge-like quantum observables, and th atF“acts” on a (real) vector 2-space, both the form of Fand the 2-space metric are de- termined. One finds that the 2-space has a non-Euclidean or “L orentzian” metric, and that various associated 2-scalars serve as glob al flavor-defining “charges,” which can be identified with charges such as stran geness, charm, baryon and lepton numbers etc.. Hence, these global charges can be used to describe individual flavors (i.e., flavor eigenstates), flav or doublets and fami- lies. Moreover, because of the aforementioned non-Euclide an constraints and certain standard-model constraints, one finds that these gl obal charges are effectively- “quantized” in such a way that families are repl icated. Finally, because these same constraints dictate that there are only a limited num- ber of values these charges can assume, one finds that familie s, and their associated neutrinos, always come in “threes.” [4] The eigenvectors QofF(i.e.,FQ=fQwhere fis the scalar fermion- number), together with certain pairs of linearly independe nt vectors ( Uand V) that resolve Q(i.e.,Q=U+V), namely, various non-Euclidean vec- tor “triads” ( Q,U,V)—these are the analogs of Euclidean triangles—serve to represent flavor-doublets in terms of a pair of quark or lep ton flavor- eigenstates as follows: |“up”/an}bracketri}ht=|q1, u1, v1,Q2,U2,2U·V/an}bracketri}ht and |“down” /an}bracketri}ht=|q2, u2, v2,Q2,U2,2U·V/an}bracketri}ht. Here,Q={q1, q2},U={u1, u2}andV={v1, v2}are column-vectors and their components q1, q2, u1, u2,v1andv2, together with the non-Euclidean scalar products Q2,U2andV2, are various global mutually-commuting flavor-defining charge-like quantum numbers. When we refer t o the “topol- ogy” of a particular neutrino flavor-eigenstate (e.g., the νe) we are referring to the topology of the corresponding vector triad (Q,U,V), with respect to the internal transformation F. And, because Fgenerates the M¨ obius group Z2(i.e.,F2=I2), those vector “triads” that are left unchanged by F, have the topology of a cylinder , whereas vector triads that are changed by F(but obviously not changed by F2=I2), have the topology of a M¨ obius strip . And, as it turns out, the neutrino flavor νe(νµorντ) corresponds to a vector triad having the topology of a cylinder (M¨ obius strip) with respect to F. 14[5] H. Umezawa, Advanced Field Theory-Micro, Macro and Thermal Physics , Am. Inst. of Physics, New York, 1993, pp. 128–129. An inexact , but neverthe- less very suggestive, analogy can be drawn between our 2D (no n-Euclidean) charge-vectors Q={q1, q2}, and the 2D (Euclidean) topological-“charge” vector called a Burgers vector. The quantized Burgers vector of a dislocation or defect in a 2D crystal lattice, is defined as the net number o f extra rows and columns one encounters while traversing a closed path ar ound the defect, expressed as a vector {columns, rows }. In general, defects are discontinuities or “tears” in some order-parameter field. In this particular case, the defect is a topological line-singularity in the crystalline order . Because the topolog- ical “charge” (Burgers vector) is conserved as the associated defect migrates through the crystal lattice, the associated defect is also c onserved within the lattice. Similarly, our quantized charge-vector Qis conserved (∆ Q= 0), as the associated fundamental-fermion (quark or lepton) move s through space- time. Conservation of the vector Qleads to the identification of Q2with the “conserved” baryon- or lepton-number. Hence, we can think o f the vector Q as being a topological “charge”, which describes certain as pects of a topo- logical “defect” (fundamental fermion) in some spacetime o rder-parameter field. The geometric object we call a vector triad, namely ( Q,U,Vwhere Q=U+V), while not generally conserved (owing to quantum transiti ons such as U1+V1⇀↽U2+V2=Q), nevertheless, provides a further de- scription of such spacetime “defects”. Finally, the topolo gy of fundamental fermions is said to be the same as that of the associated vecto r-triad under the internal transformation F. [6] C. Nash and S. Sen, Topology and Geometry for Physicists , Academic Press, New York, 1983. [7] T. Kajita, for the Super-Kamiokande, Kamiokande collab oration, hep- ex/9810001. [8] M. Gronau, Patterns of Fermion Masses, Mixing Angles and CP Vio- lation, in The Fourth Family of Quarks and Leptons, First Internati onal Symposium, edited by: D.B. Cline and Amarjit Soni, Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, New York, Volume 518, 198 7, p. 190. In the case of strongly-interacting quarks, topological co nstraints of the kind considered here can, at most, play a minor role in determinin g such things as KM-type matrix elements. For example, it is well known tha t the angle θc,V12and the d,squark masses mdandms, respectively, are related via V12= sinθc=/radicaligmd ms, where ms> m d/ne}ationslash= 0, even though the dandsquarks 15are characterized, like the νeand (νµorντ) neutrinos, respectively, by dis- tinct topologies. Somehow, the underlying topology plays a major role in mixing, in the case of the weakly-interacting neutrinos , but not in the case of the strongly-interacting quarks . The small value, and near degeneracy, of neutrino masses is probably a major factor in explaining s uch differences between quarks and neutrinos. [9] H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, “Neutrinos on Earth and in the Heavens,” hep-ph/9808293, page 5, Equation 20. [10] If M(a) =M(1 3)anyinitial neutrino “mixture” at birth would turn into the mixture (1 3νe+1 3νµ+1 3ντ) when detected at a great distance. If M(a) =M(1)anyinitial neutrino “mixture” at birth (e.g., ανe+βνµ+ γντ;α+β+γ= 1) would turn into the mixture [ ανe+(β+γ) 2νµ+(β+γ) 2ντ] when detected at great distance. [11] Ordinarily one thinks of a maximization process as desc ribing a condition ofunstable equilibrium. However, in the present situation, two different kinds of “forces” (topological and quantum) are in opposition. Ta ken together, these “forces” are constantly attempting to maintain the product f(a) =a·b at itsmaximum value. That is, the “system” described by f(a) should be in a state of stable equilibrium. [12] To put it another way, a−1 0is the arithmetic mean ofa−1 1 3anda−1 1. [13] In Section 3.0, the matrix elements a,bandcwere calculated without an in-depth understanding of the underlying dynamics. The pre sent description, based on a simple harmonic-oscillator “potential” V(x), represents a very crude first-attempt to remedy this situation. However, stri ctly speaking, to reach equilibrium at a=a0, it would also be necessary to include “damping” of some sort. This has not been done. 16

arXiv:physics/0007040v1 [physics.soc-ph] 13 Jul 2000SLAC-PUB-8357 physics/0007040 February 2000 Physicists Thriving with Paperless Publishing Heath B. O’Connell1 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford CA 94309 hoc@slac.stanford.edu http://www.slac.stanford.edu/grp/lib/people/hoconne ll.html The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) and Deutsche s Elektro- nen Synchrotron (DESY) libraries have been comprehensivel y cataloguing the High Energy Particle Physics (HEP) literature online si nce 1974. The core database, SPIRES-HEP, now indexes over 400,000 resear ch articles, with almost 50% linked to fulltext electronic versions (this sit e now has over 15 000 hits per day). This database motivated the creation of th e first site in the United States for the World–Wide Web at SLAC. With this da tabase and the invention of the Los Alamos E-print archives in 1991, the HEP community pioneered the trend to “paperless publishing” an d the trend to paperless access; in other words, the “virtual library.” We examine the im- pact this has had both on the way scientists research and on pa per-based publishing. The standard of work archived at Los Alamos is ve ry high. 70% of papers are eventually published in journals and another 2 0% are in con- ference proceedings. As a service to authors, the SPIRES-HE P collaboration has been ensuring that as much information as possible is inc luded with each bibliographic entry for a paper. Such meta-data can include tables of the experimental data that researchers can easily use to perfor m their own anal- yses as well as detailed descriptions of the experiment, cit ation tracking, and links to full-text documents. 1Work supported by the US Department of Energy contract DE-AC 03-76SF00515. Invited talk at the AAAS Annual Meeting and Science Innovati on Exposition, February 17-22, 2000 in Washington, DC 11 Introduction The World Wide Web is now ubiquitous. At a time when every adve rtisement on television seems to end with a URL, it is of some interest to note that the SLAC Library had the first Web server in North America (indeed the first outside Europe), which it set up to aid the research of High En ergy/Particle physicists. In this talk we explore the role technology has p layed in the or- ganisation and dissemination of information in High Energy Physics (HEP), where paper is now a medium of last resort, and discuss why HEP provided the ideal conditions for the rapid adoption of new technolog y. 2 The Compulsive Communicators Communication has long played a vital role in physicists’ re search. Not content to wait for the publication of their work in journals , they, or perhaps their departments, would send out preprints of their work to institutions or other researchers they personally knew (once the duplicati on process became affordable). Naturally because of the cost and effort involve d in this, large departments and famous scientists enjoyed a numerical adva ntage both in sending and receiving. However, for every poor soul in a smal l, out of the way department lamenting intellectual starvation, a well k nown researcher would be suffering from an overstuffed mailbox. By the 1960’s t he sheer number of preprints had somewhat perversely made the commun ication of research moredifficult, due to information overload. Since its foundation in 1962, the SLAC Library, at the reques t of the director, W.K.H. Panofsky, had been actively collecting ne w preprints (as a world centre for physics, it attracted some three thousand a rticles per year). The details of each preprint were entered into a card catalog ue, including every author, no matter how many there were on the paper, whic h for an experiment could easily be in the hundreds (the current reco rd is over 1000). From this catalogue, the library published a weekly list of n ew preprints for the SLAC community. In 1967 work began at Stanford University on a computer datab ase system that would be able to handle a practically limitless number o f large biblio- graphic records. It was decided early on that the SLAC Librar y’s preprint card catalogue would be a suitable test subject for this data base, and so in March 1968 the SLAC Library began SPIRES, the Stanford Phy sics In- 2formation REtrieval System. SPIRES was envisioned as a full y searchable database, and each bibliographic record would contain the p reprint’s author list (with each author’s institution), title, report numbe r, date. The remaining bibliographic element, which turned out to be of vital importance, was the paper’s reference list, that is the list of earlier papers the present paper has cited [1]. Only references to publishe d journal articles would be included (as these were the most likely to be accurat e), and they would be stored by the journal, volume and first page number. T he impor- tance of these reference lists was with SPIRES, one could sea rch through them for a given paper, and thus find every preprint that citedthe paper, thereby establishing (in some way) the impact this paper had in the litera- ture. Naturally, this is of considerable interest to physic ists [2]. However, this activity was not limited to the New World. In 19 62, the Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) in Hamburg, Germ any, had be- gun to publish a list named “High Energy Physics - An Index,” ( HEPI) of all the research literature it received. Included in this list was both the published literature and unpublished preprints (whereas S LAC concentrated mainly on preprints), amounting to some nine thousand docum ents per year. Like SLAC, DESY provided the title, author and date, but inst ead of refer- ences, HEPI staff physicists assigned to each paper up to 23 ke ywords (or, more often, key phrases) chosen from a controlled list. Naturally it made sense for the SLAC and DESY teams to work tog ether in their coverage of the particle physics literature, and so preparations for this began. By June 1969 specifications for the conversion of the DESY data to SPIRES format were complete. 3 SPIRES and the Internet 1969–1990 In 1968 the Division of Particles and Fields (DPF) of the Amer ican Physical Society funded the SLAC librarians, Louise Addis, Bob Gex an d Rita Taylor to publish a weekly preprint list for the entire particle phy sics community [3]. This list of all preprints entered in the past week could be ea sily generated from the SPIRES-HEP database. In January 1969 the first Prepr ints in Par- ticles and Fields (PPF) list was sent out to over a thousand ea ger subscribers. Therefore, to get your work known all around the world (or at l east the title of your work seen) all you would have to do would be send your pr eprint to SLAC, and similarly you could browse the titles of all the wee k’s preprints 3by just looking at one list. This established the idea of a cen tral repository for preprints. A sister “Anti-preprints” list (PPA) recorded the preprint s that had since been published in journals. This allowed the original prepr ints to be dis- carded, and proved quite popular with the journal editors, w ho were then able to match references to preprints with the published art icle. By 1974 both the SLAC and DESY libraries (and in later years ot her collaborators [4]) were working on the single HEP database, and comprehen- sively cataloguing preprints, and by extension, the publis hed literature, in high-energy physics. This new PPF age, though, was not perfect. Receiving lists of new preprints is all very well, but after several years one is lef t once again with a stack of paper. Trying to find a particular article or informa tion on a certain subject can be very difficult. The Internet allowed a further d evelopment. The problem of finding just the right preprints from this ever growing body of research was not an issue for the SLAC community. The S PIRES database allowed searches by date, author, institution, re port number, title, keywords (assigned by DESY) and a number of other fields. Simp ly by logging in to their computer, SLAC physicists were able to se arch through thousands of papers, and the paper PPF list would serve as a ne wspaper, with a similar longevity. With the rise of the Internet anyone in t he world could now access this service. A program, QSPIRES [5], developed i n 1985 [6] by SLAC database systems developer George Crane, allowed phys icists to search the SPIRES database using E-mail and other bitnet message pr otocols (which actually had priority over E-mail and hence were faster). On e would send off an E-mail query to the database and a swift reply would follow . This made an enormous difference for people outside SLAC, especially t hose outside the U.S., who had previously only been able to access SPIRES, thr ough rare and specially issued SLAC accounts. People were able to find a ll the papers by a particular author or from a certain institution, or find o ut how many citations their work had [1]. The PPF and PPA lists could also be sent by E-mail. 4 TEX and the Single Archive By 1990, lists of new articles were being sent to physicists b y E-mail and peo- ple were searching for articles in the SPIRES database via E- mail. Everything 4was modern and electronic, up to the point where you actually wanted to read a paper. In this case, the reader would have to request th at an author send a copy in the mail. Thus, if you were overseas it could tak e weeks to months before you actually saw the article; this was clearly unacceptable. Around this time another technical innovation had sufficient ly matured to obviate this problem. High energy physics articles usual ly contain a lot of mathematics, which makes them difficult to write with a standa rd typewriter. In the late 1970’s, Stanford computer scientist Donald Knut h [7] had begun work on a special typesetting program, T EX (pronounced “tek” since the “x” is actually a Greek χ), that could display mathematics beautifully [8]. After 1983 when the current version was released, the language soo n proved very popular with physicists and mathematicians as it gave them c omplete control over the production of their documents.2 The underlying “T EX-file” was simply a normal, portable text file, in which the mathematics was written using certain rules which could then be processed on any computer into a viewable final output format, such as PostScript (PS), [9], changing \int_0^1\frac{e^x}{2\pi} dx to/integraldisplay1 0ex 2πdx. The PS file can then be printed out and read. Therefore, to send a paper, all you would have to do is send the tex-file via E-mail and the p erson at the other end could process it and print it out; another step i n the commu- nication process had entered the future. By 1990 the use of T EX in the HEP community was almost universal. With preprint list distribution, SPIRES database searches , requests for papers, and even the transfer of these papers being done thro ugh E-mail, all stages of the process were electronic and pretty much immedi ate ...except one. SLAC was still receiving the E-prints as “hard-copy”. S ome authors had begun sending their preprints as T EX files, but for some researchers this would unfortunately lead to overstuffed electronic mai lboxes, echoing a problem of the Paper Days. In 1991, Paul Ginsparg of Los Alamo s National Laboratory (LANL) decided to do something about this. If aut hors could send their papers electronically to a central repository, w ith author-supplied 2This paper has been written using a derivative of T EX 5bibliographic data, a list could be sent out of each day’s additions and the preprints could be obtained directly from this archive [10] . Here, TeX proved a godsend, as it provided a means of storing rather small files that researchers could request and then process into the viewable PS files at th eir home insti- tutions. In August 1991, the first paper was sent to the Los Ala mos archive. Twenty seven papers were sent that month3and physicists began receiving daily E-mails of the new papers sent to LANL. Soon there were over 2000 subscribers to this daily E-mail no tification and it gradually began to replace SLAC’s PPF list (though not the SPIRES database itself) as the HEP community’s “newspaper” — its mo st immedi- ate source of new research information. Far from competing, though, the two services at LANL and SLAC, complemented each other nicel y. SLAC continued to process hard copy preprints that were never sen t to LANL and journal articles that had never been preprints, adding such information as their references, experiment numbers, authors’ instituti ons, etc. The elec- tronic preprints, E-prints , began to account for a good deal of the HEP literature, and Ginsparg’s system allowed for considerabl e automation and efficiency in SLAC’s work. A good deal of useful information co uld be har- vested electronically from the files authors supplied to LAN L (though there was still much that had to be done by hand). This evolution from preprints to E-prints had another impor tant facet. The E-prints were assigned a unique number of the form archive/0007040 (eg 9501251 for the 251st paper in January 1995), which the SL AC Library immediately began to store as a new element in each record in t he SPIRES database. In the past “report numbers” had been assigned to p reprints by the author’s home institution in a less than completely systema tic way and with a variety of conventions, which made the tracking of citatio ns too difficult for the SPIRES database. Thus, as mentioned earlier, only citat ions to published journal articles were recorded, and the many citations made to an author’s paper while it was an unpublished preprint were lost. The sta ndardised E- print number changed all that, since these numbers soon star ted appearing in reference lists. After some work, these citations to unpu blished works could be registered. It is worth noting that the most cited HE P article in 1998 spent some ten months as an unpublished E-print [11]. Th e next step was to ensure that the database recognised that the publishe d article and the E-print were essentially the same paper, and thus, that t he true number 3In August 1999, over 800 particle physics papers were sent to the LANL archive. 6of citations was the sum of the citations of both. In some inst ances this lead to double counting, which needed special programming t o eliminate, as it became fashionable to include boththe E-print number and the journal reference when citing an article! 5 The Mouse That Clicked With the SPIRES database and the LANL archive you could find a p articular paper and be reading it within minutes merely by sending E-ma il, after just a little work to process the T EX file and print it out. A lot had changed in 20 years since the SLAC Library first started sending out a l ist of all the preprints it had received. However, the guiding philosophy behind computing is that no work a person has to do can ever be “too little.” A new technology was about to make the research process even easier. In September 1991, SLAC physicist Paul Kunz, was visiting CE RN, Geneva, where he was shown the infant World Wide Web, which al lowed in- formation on different computers to be accessed in a very user -friendly (and now completely familiar) manner. Realising the Web interfa ce would be per- fect for searching the SPIRES database he told then libraria n and SPIRES database manager, Louise Addis, about it upon his return to S LAC. She was quick to recognise the potential of this [12] and by December SLAC had the first WWW server in the Western Hemisphere.4The E-mail access-system became obsolete as more and more physics departments instal led the free software necessary to reach the SPIRES WWW interface [13]. A group was formed at SLAC, the WWWizards [14] to provide help with WWW te chnol- ogy [15]. The key feature of the WWW is linking. Therefore, when displa ying search results in the SPIRES database, a number of things cou ld be linked to each record. One of these was the full-text at Los Alamos wh ich was being stored in a minimal fashion as T EX source. As mentioned before, T EX files need to be processed before they can be printed out. In the ear ly stages, many of the source files contained errors or idiosyncrasies t hat made them difficult to process. In order to enter all the relevant inform ation into the SPIRES database the SLAC Library staff needed to print out eac h paper, and so would process the T EX files sent to Los Alamos into PS files. At first this was done manually, which soon grew to be very time consum ing. Luckily, 4There was no Initial Public Offering. 7the SLAC Library was helped by Paul Mende from Brown Universi ty who created an automatic procedure. Accompanying figures could be faxed to the SLAC Library, where they would be converted via NextFAX t o a PS file. The PS files (of both text and figures) were then stored on a serv er at SLAC. The record in the SPIRES database would link to both the Los Al amos entry, where the T EX source file was stored, and the SLAC PS server, where the user could view the PS file. Around the same time a similar script to convert T EX source to PS had been written at Los Alamos by Tanmoy Bhattacharya, a physici st specialising in the heavily computational subfield of Lattice Gauge Theor y. Initially for personal use, this PS generating code was built into a pow erful tool by Bhattacharya, Rob Hartill and Mark Doyle. By mid 1995, the LA NL archive was producing its own PS files thereby freeing the SLAC Librar y from this task. Ultimately PS generation was incorporated into the LA NL submission process, and it came with an ultimatum: if your paper couldn’ t be processed, it wouldn’t be accepted. Many authors were shocked to find tha t the T EX files they had previously sent to Los Alamos could not be easily pro cessed, thus making their work less accessible, and welcomed this checki ng procedure. With the ability to generate PS from directly from T EX source, PS that had been generated from T EX was no longer acceptable, and by late 1996 submissions of such would be rejected [16]. For whatever rea sons, this led to some grumbling, but faced with being denied the opportuni ty to post to LANL, there was no real alternative to complying.5 With all this in place the SPIRES database was linking to reli able PS files generated and stored at the Los Alamos archive. The LANL arch ive would also link to both references and citations stored in the SPIR ES database. This formed perhaps the first publically available full-tex t, cross-linked sci- entific database. Paper had been eliminated from the process and the virtual library was born [6]. 6 The Many Hands Interpretation The model of authors sending their electronic texts to LANL h as pushed the effort of publication onto the researchers themselves, who b enefit from an inexpensive, immediate, wide-scale dissemination of thei r work. This idea 5An interesting and oftentimes amusing timeline of the devel opment of the Los Alamos archive can be found at [17]. 8has led many computer scientists to ponder automated system s for indexing and retrieving these full-text papers. How much of the work o f collecting information on the literature can be realistically facilit ated by the authors? The combination of the Web, the SLAC Library’s automated sys tems and the LANL archives provides an interesting testing ground fo r this question. The goal of the LANL archive is to be as automated as possible, so that it can exist without administrative intervention (as oppos ed to the SPIRES database). To this end it has a number of checks to ensure that all submis- sions meet the entry requirements (one we have already discu ssed ensures the TEX file is successfully processed into PS). The basic bibliogr aphic informa- tion (author, title, etc.) data is supplied by the users in a n eatly structured format that can be downloaded into the SPIRES database autom atically. This raw information requires only minor attention from the Library staff who, among other things, ensure spelling consistencies, an d add in the au- thor affiliations from the INSTITUTIONS database. Far and away the most time consuming part of this is collectin g the references of each paper, from which the citation searching is built [1]. As citation results reflect some degree of professional accomp lishment, physicists tend to be rather interested in them and a good deal of their co rrespondence with the SLAC Library concerns omissions or mistakes in the r eference lists (which is exacerbated by the posting to LANL of revised versi ons of E-prints, which often contain additional references). Originally th ese reference lists were typed into the database, but as another happy spin-off of TEX about 90% of them can now be extracted from the author’s file. Unfort unately, this only makes a huge job large, as they still have to be checked by the Library staff, and authors regularly confound the reference extract ing program by adopting imaginative new ways of writing the journal-volum e-page sequence, or simply making errors in a reference. Obviously the LANL model suggested there should be some way t o place the burden of constructing and checking the reference list o n the authors themselves (as they do with bibliographic information), be fore they send their paper out to the world. Two things really stood in the way of th is. First, the original program that extracted the references was not defin itive enough for this sort of user-side checking, as there was no real way of sp ecifying which references the code would extract, and which it would not. Th e second problem was that with physicists being rather busy, any new s ystem would have to result in less, not more, work for it to be widely adopt ed. Once again, T EX helped with the solution. The SPIRES team developed 9and offered a new service: the database would display records in TEX format, with the exact information needed to construct the referenc e as an additional tag. The authors then had a very simple process of cut and past e to create their reference lists, and the tag would sit invisibly in the TEX file (not appearing in the final PS file) waiting to be extracted at the SL AC library. The strict structure of the CITATION tag and the simplicity o f its extraction allowed for the creation of a checking program that authors c ould use, for example: \bibitem{O’Connell:1997} H.~B.~O’Connell, ‘‘Recent developments in $\rho\!-\!omega$ mixing,’’ Austral.\ J.\ Phys.\ {\bf 50}, 255 (1997) [hep-ph/9604375]. %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604375;%% which becomes: H. B. O’Connell, “Recent developments in ρ−ωmixing,” Austral. J. Phys. 50, 255 (1997) [hep-ph/9604375]. So far over five hundred papers have been written using this sy stem. A second way we’ve been experimenting with author–supplied data is asking them to help us with another thing that is of great inte rest to them: missing papers in our database. Traditionally adding them i n was another time consuming exercise that would require Library staff to g et the jour- nal from the shelves and type in all the relevant information . Using a web form that authors can fill out themselves allows a paper to be a dded to the database simply by cutting and pasting on the part of the Libr ary staff. By inviting our users to help us in maintaining the database a nd au- tomating as many processes as possible, we have been able to a ccomplish a lot of additional work without spending significant amounts of extra time. This would not be possible, though, without the eagerness an d attention to detail that characterises the Physics community. 107 All the news that’s fit to link The WWW created a unique opportunity for the SPIRES database by pro- viding a system that would conveniently attach to any record all the related information both inside the database and around the world in a very compact manner. Over the past six years we have worked on making this p rocess as efficient as possible both in terms of computer programming an d the output display our users see [18]. I shall now discuss how this works . A single record in the Literature database might have certai nbasicele- ments such as •Title •Author (and author’s institution) or corporate author •Date •Publication note but the article could also be hyperlinked to •the appropriate record in the EXPERIMENTS database •full text of article at the journal server or the E-print serv er •the references of the article •other articles that cite it •experimental data in the REACTIONS database, •the record for the conference at which the paper was given allowing the researcher to selectively explore any particu lar related item. Thus an original record only ten lines long becomes a gateway to information stored around the globe. The construction of these links requires special care and co -operation with outside services. One particular case that followed an evol utionary process was linking to the published version of the document on journ al home pages. Optimally, this URL would point to a unique “abstract page,” rendered in HTML so that the link to the journal server can be fast. Once th ere the user can be presented with all the Journal services such as full te xt in a variety of 11formats (the most common being PS or the newer Portable Docum ent File (PDF)). From the point of view of the publisher, this means th at a URL has to be found for every article. From our point of view this U RL should be calculable from the information we already have about the record, as it then permits us to run in the URL automatically. Articles hav e always been cited through the journal-volume-page (JVP) convention, s o it made sense that a number of major publishers, including the American Ph ysical Society [19] and Elsevier [20] adopted a URL scheme based on these thr ee elements. Setting up such a system does present something of a technica l challenge for the journals, but is well worth it in terms of presenting the s implest possible interface to the outside world and providing reliable acces s to their wares. The journals also link back into our database, mainly for the references of the paper (though publishers have proven less eager to link t o our database record of the actual paper). In an effort which I hope will beco me more widely adopted, we have worked closely with the American Phy sical Society’s Physical Review [21] to share the bibliographic data (including reference l ists) and either update an existing record in our database, or add a new record, when they publish new articles. Where possible we have also tried to link to other literature databases. Some, like the CERN Library’s database [22], have a significa nt overlap with our system (there are currently over fifty thousand two- way links be- tween SPIRES and CERN). Others, such as Harvard’s Astrophysics Data System [23]and the American Mathematical Society’s Mathematical Reviews (AMSMR) [24] cover a much smaller set of papers in our databas e, but from a different perspective and connect the paper to other ac ademic disci- plines. Here, once again, we need to work with the other datab ases to ensure maximal efficiency and reliability in this linking. Our links to the Harvard database use a JVP scheme, while those to CERN and AMSMR datab ases use unique record keys. SPIRES can be linked to either way. Th ere is also the consideration that the link should bring additional inform ation, rather than just repeating what record in the SPIRES database (or else wh y bother?). Therefore, we apply these links selectively. 8 So why HEP? Why did the High Energy Physics community provide such a fert ile ground for this particular aspect of the so-called “Information Re volution”? We 12have touched on the reasons throughout this talk, but it is us eful, perhaps, to summarise them to understand how this model might be more w idely adopted (or why it might notbe). The first thing is that it has not been a revolution so much as an evolution. Particle physicists have always been compulsive communica tors. Generally free of commercial or governmental restrictions, the habit of sending out ad- vanced copies of work goes back to the days of carbon paper. Th ey also have a long standing tradition of international collaboration, so any new advances in communication technology are eagerly adopted, and the hi gh technological literacy facilitates this. This is especially true of the ex perimental community whose collaborations can have hundreds of members all over t he world and whose experiments depend on high speed computer network con nections. It is worth noting that the two SLAC physicists most closely inv olved in spin- ning the web at SLAC, Paul Kunz and Tony Johnson are experimen talists, though I should also point out that Paul Ginsparg of Los Alamo s is a theorist. In this environment the sheer quantity of existing literatu re necessitated creating the organisation begun by the SLAC Library in the la te 1960’s. Through using this PPF list service, physicists became accu stomed to the idea of a central “clearing house” for preprints. As the use o f E-mail spread through the Physics community, particularly the High Energ y sector, the SPIRES E-mail interface was introduced in the mid 80’s and be fore long was being used by thousands of researchers in over forty coun tries. The T EX typesetting language, favoured by those needing to write co mplex mathemat- ics, allowed one to send simple ASCII files using E-mail, thus giving rise to the electronic distribution of preprints, which was centra lised by Ginsparg’s E-print archive. The World Wide Web then laid the ground for a highly powerful way to integrate the various facets of research com munication. It should be acknowledged that these are rather special cond itions. It is instructive to note that in other scientific communities w here T EX is less heavily used, the adoption of the LANL archives has been noti ceably slower, though in principle there is nothing to stop them (despite be ing built with TEX in mind, the archive is not dependent on it, and will accept s ubmis- sions in a variety of formats). The T EX fluent mathematics community, on the other hand, though quick to adopt the new system, perhaps lacked the detailed computing knowledge to play a leading role. For different research communities there are other obstacle s. Faced with the incredibly rapid and wholehearted adoption of this E-pr int scheme by high energy physicists, the traditional journal publisher s found it best to 13not to offer any real resistance. They had nothing to fear, rea lly, as over seventy percent of HEP papers sent to Los Alamos are eventual ly published in journals and another twenty percent appear in conference proceedings. In other fields, with newer archives, this is still something of a touchy subject, such as in the biological and medical research communities, as can be seen in the Biochemical Society’s response [25] to the NIH’s propos al for a preprint server for the life sciences [26] (further reflections on epr ints and the life sciences can be found at [27]). 9 Conclusion In this paper I have described the evolution of paperless pub lishing in a particular academic community and how special circumstanc es conspired to make this happen faster and more comprehensively than in any other field. In doing this I have hoped to convey the sense that this was ind eed a process of evolution rather than revolution. It may be interesting to speculate what the future holds. Wil l more and more of what used to be called “bibliographic data,” become a uthor–supplied “metadata” which annotates each article with various relat ed information? Can this metadata be shared to create cross-database, and cr oss-discipline, linking [28]? Our experience shows that if you make the proce dure simple enough, and offer an advantage to the authors for doing it (suc h as the ability to check their reference list), they willuse it. The challenge now is to bring this to other scholarly communities [29]. We have begun in the SPIRES-HEP database to exploit Web techn ology to handle information beyond the traditional bibliographi c record or what one could obtain from a print version (such as the full text an d reference list). These other facets range from the paper’s citation list, whi ch is constantly growing (if the author is fortunate), to the home-page of the experimental collaboration that wrote the paper, to what information res earchers might really want out of a paper, in a form far more useful than could ever be deliv- ered in paper (such as a computer file of experimental data or 3 -D computer images created by the author). The fluidity of this new, electronic means of publication als o has implica- tions for the traditional research process. At what point do es an author “give the final answer” and the paper become “set in stone”? The LANL archive, has neatly addressed this issue in an appropriate manner, by archiving each 14version of an E-print with a date stamp, documenting any modi fications in the paper. Once the article is published in a journal, it is a fi nished piece of work, with any subsequent alterations handled via errata . Other authors maycomment on the published paper, to which the author may reply, but the comment and reply are treated as new articles, and the ori ginal is left un- changed. One journal, however, has broken away from the trad itional model. Living Reviews in Relativity [30] exists solely on the Web, and allows authors to constantly revise their articles. In part this is due to th e pedagogical na- ture of the journal; it seeks to provide reviews that aid lear ning, rather than publish original research. Well aware of the difficulties of predicting anything in the In ternet world, I have merely tried, in concluding, to state some of the curre nt trends in electronic publication. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Louise Addis, Paul Ginsparg, Marek Karl iner, Pat Kreitz, Michael Peskin, Hartmut Preissner and Ann Redfield f or reading this manuscript and offering helpful comments and suggestio ns. I have also enjoyed conversations on the topics mentioned here with Ric hard Dominiak, Mark Doyle, Paul Ginsparg, Tony Johnson, John Jowett and Pau l Kunz. References [1] In the SPIRES database we use the following terminology: if paper B includes an earlier paper A in its “reference” list, then pap er A is “cited by” paper B [http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/hep/r eferences.html] [2] The SPIRES team produces a yearly list of the topcited pap ers (for that year, and all-time), with a beautiful review written by SLAC ’s Michael Peskin. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/library/topcite s [3] L. Addis, “SLAC Library monitors underground Physics Pr ess,” SLAC News (June 1971). [4] DESY, CERN, University of Durham, KEK, Yukawa Instititu te and Fermilab. 15[5] H. Galic, “Guide to QSPIRES and the particle databases on SLACVM,” SLAC-0393. SPIRES [6] P. A. Kreitz, L. Addis and A. S. Johnson, “The Virtual libr ary in action: Collaborative international control of high-energy physi cs preprints,” SLAC-PUB-7110 Presented at Grey Exploitations in the 21st Century: The Second International Conference on Grey Literature, Wa shington, D.C., 2-3 Nov, 1995 ; L. Addis, H. Galic, P. Kreitz and A. Johnson, “The Virtual lib rary in ac- tion,” SLAC-PUB-8185 Presented at 209th American Chemical Society National Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 2-6 Apr 1995 . [7] http://sunburn.stanford.edu/ knuth [8] D. E. Knuth, “The T EX book,” Addison Wesley 1986 (see also http://www.tug.org). [9] http://www.postscript.org [10] http://arXiv.org [11] J. Maldacena, “The large Nlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998) [hep-th/9711200]. [12] T. Berners-Lee, “Weaving the Web,” (Harper, 1999). An i n- teresting account of the development of SLAC’s web server can be found in Louise Addis’ First Monday interview http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5 5/addis/ [13] http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/hep [14] http://www.slac.stanford.edu/find/wizards.html [15] J. M. Deken, “First in the web, but where are the pieces?” SLAC-PUB- 7636. SPIRES [16] http://arXiv.org/help/faq/whytex [17] http://arXiv.org/new/91-94.html 16[18] Much of the work for this linking was done by the former HE P database manager, Hrvoje “Harv” Galic. A good account of the adop- tion of new technologies to enhance the database can be found at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/spires news.html [19] http://www.aps.org [20] http://www.elsevier.com/npe [21] http://prd.aps.org [22] http://alice.cern.ch [23] http://adsabs.harvard.edu [24] http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/search [25] http://www.biochemistry.org/ebiomedresp.htm [26] www.nih.gov/welcome/director/pubmedcentral/pubm edcentral.htm [27] http://arxiv.org/blurb/beagle99.html [28] H. Van de Sompel and P. Hochstenbach, “Reference linkin g in a hybrid library environment,” D-Lib Magazine 5no. 4 and D-Lib Magazine 5 no. 10 [http://www.dlib.org] [29] http://www.openarchives.org [30] http://www.livingreviews.org 17

arXiv:physics/0007041v1 [physics.geo-ph] 13 Jul 2000The shock-acoustic waves generated by the earthquakes Afraimovich E. L., Perevalova N. P., Plotnikov A. V., Uralov A. M. Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SD RAS, p. o. box 4026, Irkutsk, 664033, Russia fax: +7 3952 462557; e-mail: afra@iszf.irk.ru Abstract We investigate the form and dynamics of shock-acoustic wave s generated by earthquakes. We use the method for detecting and locating the sources of ionospheric impulsive disturbances, based on using data fr om a global network of receivers of the GPS navigation system and requiring no a p riori informa- tion about the place and time of associated effects (Afraimov ich et al., 2000). The practical implementation of the method is illustrated b y a case study of earthquake effects in Turkey in 1999. It was found that in all i nstances the ionospheric response has the character of an N-wave. The period is 180-390 s, and the amplitude exceeds by a factor of two as a minimum the standard deviation of background fluctuations in total electron cont ent in this range of periods under quite and moderate geomagnetic conditions. T he elevation of the wave vector varies through a range of 20-44◦, and the phase velocity (1100-1300 m/s) approaches the sound velocity at the heights of the iono spheric F-region maximum. The calculated (by neglecting refraction correct ions) location of the source roughly corresponds to the earthquake epicenter. Ou r data are consis- tent with the present views that shock-acoustic waves are ca used by a piston-like movement of the Earth surface in the zone of an earthquake epi center. 1 Introduction A plethora of publications have been devoted to the study of t he ionospheric response to disturbances arising from impulsive forcing on the Earth ’s atmosphere. It was found that in many cases a high proportion of the energy of the initial atmospheric disturbance is concentrated in the acoustic shock wave. Lar ge earthquakes also pro- vide the natural source of impulsive forcing. Scientific int erest in this problem is also indicated by the fact that such events can be treated as a ctive experiments in the Earth’s atmosphere, and they can be used in solving man y problems in the ionospheric physics, the ionospheric propagation of radio waves, the physics of at- mospheric waves, etc. These investigations have also important practical implic ations since they furnish a means of substantiating reliable signal indications of te chnogenic effects (among them, unauthorized), which is necessary for the constructi on of an effective global radiophysical subsystem for detection and localization of these effects. Essentially, existing global systems of such a purpose use different proce ssing techniques for infrasound and seismic signals. However, in connection wit h the expansion of the 1geography and of the types of technogenic impact on the envir onment, very chal- lenging problems heretofore have been those of improve the s ensitivity of detection and the reliability of measured parameters of the sources of impacts, based also on using independent measurements of the entire spectrum of si gnals generated during such effects. To solve the above problems requires reliable information a bout fundamental parameters of the ionospheric response of the shock wave, su ch as the amplitude and the form, the period, the phase and group velocity of the w avetrain, as well as angular characteristics of the wave vector. Note that for the designating the ionospheric response of the shock wave, the literature uses terminology incorporat- ing a different physical interpretation, among them the term ‘shock-acoustic wave’ (SAW) (Nagorsky, 1998). For convenience, in this paper we sh all use this term despite the fact that it does not reflect essentially the phys ical nature of the phe- nomenon. There is a wide scatter of the published data on the main param eters of SAWs generated during industrial explosions and earthquakes. T he oscillation period of the ionospheric response of SAWs varied from 30 to 300 sec., a nd the propagation velocity fluctuated from 700 to 1200 m/s (Nagorsky, 1998; Fit zgerald, 1997; Calais et al., 1998; Afraimovich et al., 1984; Blanc, 1989). The lack of comprehensive, reliable data on SAW parameters i s due primarily to the limitations of existing experimental methods and det ection facilities. The main body of data was obtained by measuring the frequency Dop pler shift at ver- tical and oblique-incidence ionospheric soundings in the H F range (Nagorsky, 1998; Afraimovich et al., 1984; Jacobson and Carlos, 1994). In som e instances the sensi- tivity of this method is sufficient to detect the SAW reliably; however, difficulties emerge when localizing the region where the detected signal is generated. These problems are caused by the multiple-hop character of HF sign al propagation. This gives no way of deriving reliable information about the phas e and group velocities of SAW propagation, estimating angular characteristics of the wave vector, and, further still, of localizing the SAW source. Using the method of transionospheric sounding with VHF radi o signals from geostationary satellites, a number of experimental data on SAW parameters were obtained in measurements of the Faraday rotation of the plan e of signal polarization which is proportional to a total electron content (TEC) alon g the line connecting the satellite-borne transmitter with the receiver (Mendillo, 1981; 1982; Li et al., 1994). A common drawback of the above-mentioned methods when deter mining the SAW phase velocity is the necessity of knowing the time of eve nts since this velocity is inferred from the SAW delay with respect to the time of even ts assuming that the velocity is constant along the propagation path, which is qu ite contrary to fact. For determining the above-mentioned reasonably complete s et of SAW parame- ters, it is necessary to have appropriate spatial and tempor al resolution which cannot be ensured by existing, very sparse, networks of ionozondes , oblique-incidence ra- dio sounding paths, and the incoherent scatter radars. Furt hermore, the creation of these facilities involves developing dedicated equipme nt, including powerful radio transmitters which contaminate the radio medium. As a resul t, the above systems cannot serve as an efficient basis for a global radiophysical s ubsystem for detec- 2tion and localization of technogenic effects which must prov ide a continuous, global monitoring. The advent and evolution of a Global Positioning System (GPS ), and also the creation on its basis of widely branched networks of GPS stat ions (at least 700 sites at the May 2000), the data from which are placed on the IN TERNET, opened up a new era in remote ionospheric sensing. In the immediate f uture this network will undergo a substantial expansion by integration with th e GLONASS positioning system (Klobuchar, 1997). Currently some authors have embarked on an intense developm ent of methods for detecting the ionospheric response of strong earthquak es (Calais and Minster, 1995), rocket launchings (Calais and Minster, 1996), and in dustrial surface explo- sions (Fitzgerald, 1997; Calais et al., 1998). In the cited r eferences the SAW phase velocity was determined by the ‘crossing’ method by estimat ing the time delay of SAW arrival at subionospheric points corresponding to diffe rent GPS satellites ob- served at a given time. However, the accuracy of such a method is rather low because the altitude at which the subionospheric points are specified, is determined in a crude way. The goal of this paper is to describe a method for determining SAW parameters (including the phase velocity, angular characteristics of the SAW wave vector, the direction towards the source, and the source location) usin g GPS-arrays whose el- ements can be chosen out of a large set of GPS stations of a glob al GPS network (Afraimovich et al., 2000). Contrary to existing radio tech niques, this method esti- mates SAW parameters without a priori information about the location and time of a earthquake. Section 2 presents a description of the experimental geomet ry, and general infor- mation about the earthquakes under consideration. The prop osed method is briefly outlined in Section 3. Results of measurements of SAW parame ters from different GPS arrays during earthquakes are presented in Section 4. Se ction 5 is devoted to the discussion of experimental results, including analyti cal simulation results. 2 The geometry and general characterization of exper- iments This paper presents the results derived from determining th e main parameters of SAWs during two earthquakes in Turkey in 1999. In spite of the small number of GPS stations in the earthquake area, we were able to use a suffic ient number of GPS stations for the implementation of the proposed method. Table??presents the geographic coordinates of the GPS stations used as GPS ar ray elements. Fig.??illustrates the experimental geometry during the earthqua kes in Turkey. Heavy dots and large lettering show the location and the name s of the GPS stations. The scaling of the coordinate axes is chosen from considerat ions of an approximate equality of the linear dimensions along the latitude and lon gitude. Detection results on two earthquakes in Turkey (August 17, 1 999, and November 12, 1999) are presented below. The information about the ear thquakes, presented below, was acquired via the INTERNET ”http://earthquake.u sgs.gov”. General information about these earthquakes is presented in Table ??(including the time of 3the main shock t0in the universal time UT, the position of the earthquake epic enter, depth, the magnitude, as well as the level of geomagnetic dis turbance from the data onDst-variations). It was found that the deviation of Dstfor the selected days was quite moderate, which enabled the SAWs to be identified. 3 Methods of determining shock-acoustic wave charac- teristics using GPS-arrays The standard GPS technology provides a means for wave distur bances detecion based on phase measurements of TEC at each of spaced two-frequency GPS receivers. A method of reconstructing TEC variations from measurements of the ionosphere- induced additional increment of the group and phase delay of the satellite radio signal was detailed and validated in a series of publication s (Calais and Minster, 1995, 1996; Fitzgerald, 1997). We reproduce here only the fin al formula for phase measurements I=1 40.308f2 1f2 2 f2 1−f2 2[(L1λ1−L2λ2) +const +nL] (1) where L1λ1andL2λ2are additional paths of the radio signal caused by the phase delay in the ionosphere, (m); L1andL2represent the number of phase rotations at the frequencies f1andf2;λ1andλ2stand for the corresponding wavelengths, (m); const is the unknown initial phase ambiguity, (m); and nLare errors in determining the phase path, (m). Phase measurements in the GPS can be made with a high degree of accuracy corresponding to the error of TEC determination of at least 1 014m−2when averaged on a 30-second time interval, with some uncertainty of the in itial value of TEC, however (Hofmann-Wellenhof et al., 1992). This makes possi ble detecting ionization irregularities and wave processes in the ionosphere over a w ide range of amplitudes (up to 10−4of the diurnal TEC variation) and periods (from 24 hours to 5 m in). The unit of TEC TECU , which is equal to 1016m−2and is commonly accepted in the literature, will be used in the following. In some instances a convenient way of detecting and determin ing the ionospheric response delay of the shock wave involves inferring the freq uency Doppler shift F from TEC series obtained by formula (1). Such an approach is a lso useful in com- paring TEC response characteristics from the GPS data with t hose obtained by analyzing VHF signals from geostationary satellites, as we ll as in detecting the shock wave in the HF range. To an approximation sufficient for t he purpose of our investigation, a corresponding relationship was obtained by K. Davies (1969) F= 13.5×10−8I′ t/f (2) where I′ tstands for the time derivative of TEC. Relevant results deri ved from an- alyzing the F(t)-variations calculated for the ‘reduced’ frequency of 136 MHz are discussed in Section 4. The correspondence of space-time phase characteristics, o btained through tran- sionospheric soundings, with local characteristics of dis turbances in the ionosphere 4was considered in detail in a wide variety of publications (B ertel et al., 1976; Afraimovich et al., 1992; Mercier and Jacobson, 1997) and is not analyzed at length in this study. The most important conclusion of the cited ref erences is the fact that, as for the extensively exploited model of a ‘plane phas e screen’ disturbances ∆I(x,y,t) of TEC faithfully copy the horizontal part of the correspon ding distur- bance ∆ N(x,y,z,t ) of local concentration, independently of the angular posi tion of the source, and can be used in experiments on measuring the wa ve disturbances of TEC. However, the TEC response amplitude experiences a strong az imuthal depen- dence caused by the integral character of a transionospheri c sounding. As a first approximation, the transionospheric sounding method is re sponsive only to TIDs with the wave vector Ktperpendicular to the direction r. A corresponding condi- tion for elevation θand azimuth αof an arbitrary wave vector Ktnormal to the direction r, has the form θ= arctan( −cos(αs−α)/tanθs) (3) where αsis the azimuthal angle, counted off from the northward in a clo ckwise direction; and θsis the angle of elevation between the direction ralong Line-of- Sight (LOS) to the satellite and the terrestrial surface at t he reception site. We used formula (3) in determining the elevation θofKtfrom the known mean value of azimuth αby Afraimovich et al. (1998) – see Sections 3.2 and 4. 3.1 Detection and determination of the horizontal phase vel ocity Vhand the direction αof the SAW phase front along the ground by GPS-arrays In the simplest form, space-time variations of the TEC ∆ I(t,x,y) in the ionosphere, at each given time tcan be represented in terms of the phase interference patter n that moves without a change in its shape (the solitary, plane travelling wave) ∆I(t,x,y) =δsin(Ωt−Kxx−Kyy+ϕ0) (4) where δ,Kx,Ky, Ω — are the amplitude, the x- and y-projections of the wave ve ctor K, and the angular frequency of the disturbance, respectivel y;T= 2π/Ω, Λ = 2π/|K|is its period and wavelength; and ϕ0is the initial phase of the disturbance. The vector Kis a horizontal projection of the full vector Kt. For the SAW which have mostly the character of an N-wave (Li et al., 1994; Calais and Minster, 1995, 1996; Fitzgerald, 1997; Calais et al., 1998), the amplitude δin (4) can be specified as (with an appropriate choice of the mo del parameters) δ(t) = exp[ −(t−tmax td)2] (5) where tmaxis the time when the disturbance has a maximum amplitude, and tdis the half-thickness of the ‘wave packet’. At this point, it is assumed that in the case of small spatial a nd temporal incre- ments (the distances between GPS-array sites are less than t he typical spatial scale 5of TEC variation, and the time interval between counts is les s than the correspond- ing time scale), the influence of second derivatives can be ne glected. The following choices of GPS-arrays all meet these requirements. We now summarize briefly the sequence of data processing proc edures. Out of a large number of GPS stations, three sites (A, B, C) are selec ted, the distances between which do not exceed about one-half the expected wave length Λ of the per- turbation. Site B is taken to be the center of a topocentric re ference frame whose axisxis directed eastward, and the axis yis directed northward. The receivers in this frame of reference have the coordinates ( xA,yA), (0,0), ( xC,yC). Such a config- uration of the GPS receivers represents the GPS-array with a minimum number of the required elements. In regions with a dense network of GPS sites, we can obtain a large variety of GPS-arrays of a different configuration ena bling the acquired data to be checked for reliability; in this paper we have exploite d such a possibility. The input data include series of the ‘oblique’ value of TEC IA(t),IB(t),I(t), as well as corresponding series of values of the elevation θs(t) and the azimuth αs(t) of the beam to the satellite calculated using our developed C ONVTEC software program which converts the RINEX-files, standard for the GPS system, from the INTERNET. For determining SAW characteristics, continuou s series of measure- ments of IA(t),IB(t),IC(t) are selected with a length of at least a one-hour interval which includes the time of a earthquake. To eliminate variations of the regular ionosphere, as well a s trends introduced by orbital motion of the satellite, a procedure is used to rem ove the linear trend involving a preliminary smoothing of the initial series wit h the selected time window. This procedure is best suited to the detection of the signal s uch as a single pulse (N-wave) when compared to the frequently used band-pass filter (Li et al., 1994; Calais and Minster, 1995, 1996; Fitzgerald, 1997; Calais et al., 1998). A limitation of the band-pass filter is the delay and the oscillatory charact er of the response which gives no way of reconstructing the form of the N-wave. Series of the values of the elevation θs(t) and azimuth αs(t) of the beam to the satellite are used to determine the location of the subionos pheric point, as well as to calculate the elevation θof the wave vector Ktof the disturbance from the known azimuth α(see formula (3)). The most reliable results from the determination of SAW para meters correspond to high values of elevations θs(t) of the beam to the satellite because sphericity effects become reasonably small. In addition, there is no nee d to recalculate the ‘oblique’ value of TEC ∆ I(t) to the ‘vertical’ value. In this paper, all results were obtained for elevations θs(t) larger than 30◦. Since the distance between GPS-array elements (from severa l tens of kilometers to a few thousand kilometers) is much smaller than that to the GPS satellite (over 20000 km), the array geometry at the height hmaxis identical to that on the ground. Fig.??a shows typical time dependencies of an ‘oblique’ TEC I(t) at the GPS- array BSHM station near the area of the earthquake of August, 17, 1999. (heavy curve), one day before and after the earthquake (thin lines) . For the same days; panel b shows TEC variations ∆ I(t) with the removed linear trend and a smoothing with the 5-min time window. Variations in frequency Doppler shiftF(t), ‘reduced’ to the sounding signal frequency of 136 MHz, for three sites o f the array (KATZ 6BSHM GILB) for the August 17, 1999, are presented in panel c. D ay numbers, GPS station names and GPS PRN satellite numbers are indicated in all panels. It is evident from Fig. ??that fast N-shaped oscillations with a typical period of about 390 s are clearly distinguished among slow TEC varia tions. The oscillation amplitude (up to 0.12 TECU ) is far in excess of the TEC fluctuation intensity during ‘background’ days. Variations in frequency Doppler shift F(t) for spatially separated sites (KATZ BSHM GILB) are well correlated but are shifted re lative to each other by an amount well below the period, which permits the SAW prop agation velocity to be unambiguously determined. A time resolution of 30 s use d in our study, which is standard for the GPS data, is not quite sufficient for determ ining small shifts of such signals with an adequate accuracy for different sites of the array. Therefore, we used a parabolic approximation of the F(t)-oscillations in the neighborhood of minimum F(t), which is quite acceptable when the signal/noise ratio is h igh. With proper account of a good signal/noise ratio (larger tha n 1), we determine the horizontal projection of the phase velocity Vhwith the known coordinates of array sites A, B, C from time tpshifts of a maximum deviation of the frequency Doppler shift F(t). Preliminarily measured shifts are subjected to a linear t ransfor- mation with the purpose of calculating shifts for sites spac ed relative to the central site northward Nand eastward E. This is followed by a calculation of the E- and N-components of VxandVy, as well as the direction αin the range of angles 0–360◦ and the modulus Vhof the horizontal component of the SAW phase velocity α= arctan( Vy/Vx) Vh=|VxVy|(V2 x+V2 y)−1/2 (6) where Vy,Vxare the velocities with which the phase front crosses the axe sxandy. The orientation αof the wave vector K, which is coincident with the propagation azimuth of the SAW phase front, is calculated unambiguously in the range 0–360◦ subject to the condition that arctan (Vy/Vx) is calculated having regard to the sign of the numerator and denominator. The above method for determining the SAW phase velocity negl ects the correc- tion for orbital motion of the satellite because the estimat es ofVhobtained below exceed an order of magnitude as a minimum the velocity of the s ubionospheric point at the height hmaxfor elevations θs>30◦(Afraimovich et al., 1998). From the delay ∆ t=tp−t0and the known path length between the launch pad and the subionospheric point we calculated also the SAW mean velocity Vain order to compare our obtained estimates of the SAW phase velocity w ith the usually used method of measuring this quantity. 3.2 Determination of the wave vector elevation θand the velocity modulus Vtof the shock wave Afraimovich et al. (1992) showed that for an exponential ion ization distribution the TEC disturbance amplitude ( M) is determined by the aspect angle γbetween the vectors Ktandr, as well as by the ratio of the wavelength of the disturbance Λ to the half-thickness of the ionization maximum hd 7M∝exp/parenleftBigg −π2h2 dcos2γ Λ2cos2θs/parenrightBigg (7) where θsis the elevation of the wave vector r. In the case under consideration (see below), for the phase ve locity of order 1 km/s and for the period of about 200 s, the wavelength Λ is comparab le with the half- thickness of the ionization maximum hd. When the elevations θsare 30◦, 45◦, 60◦, the ‘beam-width’ M(γ) at 0.5 level is, respectively, 25◦, 22◦and 15◦. Ifhdis twice as large as the wavelength, then the beam tapers to 14◦, 10◦and 8◦, respectively. The beam-width is sufficiently small that the aspect conditio n (3) restricts the number of beam trajectories to the satellite, for which it is possible to detect reliably the SAW response in the presence of noise (near the angles γ= 90◦). On the other hand, formula (3) can be used to determine the elevation θof the wave vector Kt of the shock wave at the known value of the azimuth α(Afraimovich et al., 1998). Hence the phase velocity modulus Vtcan be defined as Vt=Vh×sec(θ) (8) The above values of the width M(γ) determine the error of calculation of the elevations θ(of order 20◦to the above conditions (Section 3.3). 3.3 Determining the position and ‘switch-on’ time of the SAW source without regard for refraction corrections The ionospheric region that is responsible for the main cont ribution to TEC varia- tions lies in the neighborhood of the maximum of the ionosphe ricF-region, which does determine the height hmaxof the subionospheric point. When selecting hmax, it should be taken into consideration that the decrease in elec tron density with height above the main maximum of the F2-layer proceeds much more slowly than is the case below the maximum. Since the density distribution with height is essentially a ‘weight function’ of the TEC response to a wave disturbance (Afraimovich et al., 1992), it is appropriate to use, as hmax, the value exceeding the true height of the layer hF2maximum by about 100 km. hF2varies over a reasonably wide range (250–350 km) depending on the time of day and on some geophysi cal factors which, when necessary, can be taken into account if corresponding a dditional experimen- tal data and current ionospheric models are used. In all calc ulations that follow, hmax= 400 km is used. To a first approximation, it can be assumed that it is at this al titude where the imaginary detector is located, which records the ionospher ic SAW response in TEC variations. The ‘horizontal size’ of the detection region, which can be inferred from the propagation velocity of the subionospheric point as a co nsequence of the orbital motion of the GPS satellite (of order 50 m/s), and from the SAW period (of order 200 s — see Section 4), does not exceed 10–20 km, which is far sm aller than the ‘vertical size’. From the GPS data we can determine the coordinates XsandYsof the subiono- spheric point in the horizontal plane X0Yof a topocentric frame of reference centered on the point B(0,0) at the time of a maximum TEC deviation caus ed by the arrival 8of the SAW at this point. Since we know the angular coordinate sθandαof the wave vector Kt, it is possible to determine the location of the point at whic h this vector intersects the horizontal plane X′0Y′at the height hwof the assumed source. As- suming a rectilinear propagation of the SAW from the source t o the subionospheric point and neglecting the sphericity the coordinate XwandYwof the source in a topocentric frame of reference can be defined as Xw=Xp−(hmax−hw)cosθsinα sinθ(9) Yw=Yp−(hmax−hw)cosθcosα sinθ(10) The coordinates XwandYw, thus obtained, can readily be recalculated to the values of the latitude and longitude ( φwandλw) of the source. For SAW generated during earthquakes, industrial explosio ns and underground tests of nuclear devices, hwis taken to be equal to 0 (the source lying at the ground level). Given the coordinates of the subionospheric point and of the disturbance source, the mean value of the SAW propagation velocity between the so urce and the subiono- spheric point, and the arrival time of the SAW at this point, t hen within the ap- proximation of a rectilinear propagation it is easy to deter mine the ‘switch-on’ delay ∆twof the anticipated SAW source with respect to the start. This would make it possible to obtain additional information about the SAW sou rce which is needed to understand the mechanism of SAW generation. The estimates o f ∆twmade below assume that the propagation velocity is taken equal to 700 m/ s (see Li et al., 1994). Note that by the ‘switch-on’ time of the source is meant here t he time of a maximum disturbance of the background state of the medium when the SA W is generated. 4 Results of measurements Hence, using the transformations described in Section 3, we obtain the parameters set determined from TEC variations and characterizing the S AW (see Table ??). Let us consider the results derived from analyzing the ionos pheric effect of SAW during earthquake August 17, 1999 obtained at the array (KAT Z, BSHM, GILB) for PRN 6 (at the left of Fig. ??, and line 2 in Table ??). In this case the delay of the SAW response with respect to the t ime of the earthquake is 20 min (DAY 229). The SAW has the form of an N-wave with a period Tof about 390 s and an amplitude AI= 0.12TECU , which is an order of magnitude larger than TEC fluctuations for background days ( DAY 228, DAY 230). It should be noted, however, that this time interval was char acterized by a very low level of geomagnetic activity (-14 nT). The amplitude of a maximum frequency Doppler shift AFat the ‘reduced’ fre- quency of 136 MHz was found to be 0.04 Hz. In view of the fact tha t the shift Fis inversely proportional to the sounding frequency squared ( Davies, 1969), this corre- sponds to a Doppler shift at the working frequency of 13.6 MHz and the equivalent oblique-incidence sounding path of about AF= 4 Hz. Solid curves in Fig. ??represent the trajectories of the subionospheric points fo r each GPS satellite at the height hmax=400 km. Dark diamonds along the trajectories 9correspond to the coordinates of the subionospheric points at time tpof a maximum deviation of the TEC (Fig. ??b and Fig. ??e). Crosses show the positions of the earthquake epicenters. Asterisks mark the source location at 0 km altitude inferred from the data from the GPS arrays. Numbers at the asterisks co rrespond to the respective day numbers. Straight dashed lines that connect the expected source and the subionospheric point represent the horizontal project ion of the wave vector Kt. The azimuth and elevation αandθof the wave vector Ktwhose horizontal projection is shown in Fig. ??by a dashed line and is marked by K1, are 154◦and 26◦, respectively. The horizontal component and the modulus of the phase velocity were found to be Vh= 1307 m/s and Vt= 1174 m/s. The source coordinates at 0 km altitude were determined as φw= 39.1◦andλw= 25.9◦. The ‘switch-on’ delay of the SAW source ∆ twwith respect to the start time was 12 s. Similar results for the array (KABR, TELA, GILB) and PRN 30 we re also ob- tained for the earthquake of November 12, 1999. They corresp ond to the projection of the vector K2in Fig. ??, the time dependencies in Fig. ??at the right, and to line 7 in Table ??. The only point deserving mention here is that the SAW amplit ude was somewhat smaller than that for the earthquake of August 1 7, 1999. With an increased level of geomagnetic activity ( -44 nT), this led t o a smaller (compared with August 17, 1999) ”signal/noise” ratio; yet this did not hinder to obtain reliable estimates of the SAW parameters. A comparison of the data for both earthquakes showed a reason ably close agree- ment of SAW parameters irrespective of the level of geomagne tic disturbance, the season, and the local time. To convince ourselves that the determination of the main par ameters of the SAW form and dynamics is reliable for the earthquakes analyzed h ere, in the area of the earthquake we selected different combinations of three site s out of the sets of GPS stations available to us, and these data were processed with the same processing parameters. Relevant results (including the average resul ts for the sets Σ), pre- sented in Table ??and in Fig. ??(SAW source position), show that the values of SAW parameters are similar, which indicates a good stabilit y of the data obtained, irrespective of the GPS-array configuration. The aspect condition (3), corresponding to a maximum amplit ude of the TEC response to the transmission of SAWs, was satisfied quite wel l for this geometry, simultaneously for all stations. This is confirmed by a high d egree of correlation of the SAW responses at the array elements (Fig. ??c and Fig. ??f), which made it possible to obtain different sets of triangles out of the six G PS stations available to us. 5 Discussion The data of Table ??are quite sufficient to estimate the position of the disturban ces under discussion in the diagnostic diagram of the atmospher ic waves. Specifically, the values of the characteristic periods of bipolar signals , presented in Fig. ??a and Fig. ??b, are T1≈300 s, and T2≈200 s. The wave vectors make with the vertical the angles β1≈70◦andβ2≈50◦. At the height z≈400 km, in turn, the periods, corresponding to local frequencies of the acou stic cut-off ωaand the 10Brent-Vaisala ωb, are: Ta= 2π/ωa≈950 s, Tb= 2π/ωb≈1050 s. In an isothermal atmosphere, only harmonics with periods larger than Tb/sin β can be assigned to the branch of internal gravity waves. This value exceeds signifi cantly the values of T1,2. Furthermore, T1,2is considerably smaller than Ta. Hence we can contend that under conditions of the real (nonisothermal) atmosphere the dist urbances under discussion almost entirely pertain to the branch of acoustic waves. Since in (short) acoustic waves the variation ∆ Nin neutral density Nsatisfies the relation ∆ N/N≈u/C(uis the gas velocity in the wave, and Cis the local velocity of sound), it is possible to make a lower estimate of the intensi tyu/Cof the waves at the expected altitudes zeff≈350–400 km: ∆ N/N≈∆Ne/Ne≈∆I/I≈0.02−0.04. In this estimation, the influence of the magnetic field is omit ted, and the index e refers to electrons. The actual intensity of the acoustic wa ve must be higher than the estimated value presented above. In the case of an earthquake, the movements of the terrestria l surface are plau- sible sources of acoustic waves. A generally known source of the first type is the Rayleigh surface wave propagating from the epicentral zone . The epicentral region itself is the source of the second type. Let us discuss these p ossibilities. 5.1 The Rayleigh wave The phase propagation velocity of the Rayleigh wave VR≈3.3 km/s. Since VR≫C0, where C0≈0.34 km/s is the sound velocity at the ground, only acoustic wav es can be emitted (Golitsyn and Klyatskin, 1967). At a sufficient dista nce from the epicenter where the curvature of the Rayleigh wave front can be neglect ed, and with the proviso thatω≫ωa, acoustic waves are emitted at the angle βR≈arcsin (C0/VR)≈6◦to the vertical. Rayleigh waves propagate generally in the form of a train con sisting of several oscillations whose typical period only rarely exceeds seve ral tens of seconds. Acoustic waves are emitted upward in the form of the same train. Becaus e of a strong absorption of the periodic wave, the only thing that is left o ver in the case of the acoustic train at heights z≥350 km is only the leading phase of compression. It seems likely that only in the case of very strong earthquakes (Alaskian earthquake of 1964), even at large distances from the epicenter, the dis turbance (the leading portion of the acoustic train) that remains from the acousti c train, can have at these altitudes a duration of about 100 s, and quite an appreciable (u/C > 0.1) intensity (Orlov and Uralov, 1987) the nonlinear acoustics approxima tion). Unfortunately, the parameters of Rayleigh waves in the neig hborhood of the subionospheric points appearing in Table ??are unknown to us. However, a most pronounced bipolar character of the main signal (Fig. ??b and Fig. ??e), its intensity, and its very long duration cast some doubt upon the fact that i t is the Rayleigh wave which is responsible for its origin. Such a conclusion i s consistent with the observed propagation direction of the bipolar pulse, which makes a very large angle with the vertical: β1,2≈70–50◦≫β” R≈15–18◦. Here it is taken into consideration that the acoustic ray ori ginating from a point on the ground at the angle of βR≈6◦now makes at the heights z=zeffan angle β” R> βRbecause of the refraction effect in a standard atmospheric mo del: C0/sin β R=C/sin β” R=const =VR,C(z=zeff)≈0.9–1 km/s. And, finally, irre- 11spective of the atmospheric model, the phase velocity Vh(Table ??) of the horizontal trace of there acoustic disturbance generated by the Raylei gh wave must coincide withVR, and this is also not observed: Vh≪VR. 5.2 The epicentral emitter The detection of ionospheric disturbances, which are presu mably generated by a vertical displacement of the terrestrial surface directly in the epicentral zone of an earthquake, using the GPS probing method, is reported in (Ca lais and Minster, 1995). Results of the present study lend support to the above conjecture. However, the specific formation mechanism for the disturbance itself is still unclear. An ap- proach to solving this problem is contained in earlier work, and involves substituting the epicentral emitter for a surface velocity point source o r an explosion. In par- ticular, the substitution of the earthquake zone for a point source turns out to be fruitful when describing long-period internal gravity wav es at a very long (thousands of kilometers) distance from the epicenter (Row, 1967). The visual resemblance of ionospheric disturbances at short (hundreds of kilometers ) distances from the earth- quake epicenter to disturbances from surface explosions is discussed in (Calais et al., 1998). It should be noted that ionospheric disturbances generated by industrial surface and underground nuclear explosions are also visually simil ar. However, the genera- tion mechanisms for disturbances are fundamentally differe nt in this case (Rudenko and Uralov, 1995). The radiation source in underground nucl ear tests is, as in the case of earthquakes, the terrestrial surface disturbed by t he explosion. The intensity and spectral composition of the generated acoustic signal r eveal a strong (unlike the surface explosion) dependence on the zenith angle, and are w holly determined by the form, size and characteristics of the movement of the ter restrial surface in the epicentral zone of the underground explosion. In this Section, we shall propose a model which, we hope, will help to understand the generation mechanism for acoustic disturbances - the su bject of this paper. Be- cause of the obvious complexity of the problem formulated, a nd for lack of sufficient data on characteristics of the movement of the terrestrial s urface in epicentral zones of earthquakes, the idealized model under discussion has an illustrative character. The computational scheme proposed below represents a simpl ified variant of the scheme used in (Rudenko and Uralov, 1995) to calculate ionos pheric disturbances generated by an underground confined nuclear explosion. 5.3 The problem of radiation of the acoustic signal For the sake of simplicity, we consider a problem having an ax ial symmetry about the vertical axis zpassing through the earthquake epicenter r=z= 0. The epi- central emitter is a set of plane annular velocity sources wi th the specified law of motion along the vertical U(r,t). Since our interest is with the estimation of the characteristics of an acoustic disturbance at a sufficient di stance from the emitter, we take advantage of the far-field approximation of a linear p roblem of radiation. In the approximation of linear acoustics ω≫ωaand with no absorption present, the gas velocity profile in the wave can be estimated by the expres sion: 12u(τ,β) =A πRC 0/integraldisplayL 0/integraldisplay+∞ −∞a(t′,r)rdrdt′ /radicalBig y2−(τ−t′)2||τ−t′|≤y(11) where τ=t−/integraltextl 0dl/C,y=rsinβ C0. Here βis the zenith angle of departure of the acoustic ray from the point r=z= 0. lis the group path length (the distance along the ray). a(t′,r) =dU(r,t) dtis the vertical acceleration of the terrestrial surface. A=A(z) =/radicalBig C0ρ0 Cρis the acoustic factor. ρ0, ρstand for the air density at the ground and at the height z, respectively, and L is a typical radius of the epicentral emitter. In an isothermal atmosphere where the ray trajectories are s traight lines, the quantity R= (√ r2+z2=l) is the radius of a divergent (in the far-field approxima- tion) spherical wave. In this case the cross-section of the s elected ray tube S∞R2. In the real atmosphere the value of Sis determined from geometrical optics equations, and using the expression (11) requires a further complicati on of the computational scheme. Nevertheless, to make estimates we shall use only th e relatio (11), and, in doing so, the value of Rwill be corrected. The case β= 0 (and also l=R=z) is a special one: u(τ,β= 0) =A RC0/integraldisplayL 0a(τ,r)rdr (12) Let us discuss the situation where all ring-type emitters ”o perate” synchronously: U(r,t) =U(t). In this case the epicentral zone is emitting as a round pist on 2Lin diameter. Assume also that with a shock of the earthquake, th e vertical displacement ξ, the velocity U=dξ/dt and the acceleration a=dU/dt are time dependent, as shown in Fig. ??a. For a rectangular velocity impulse, i.e. in the limit ∆ t≫δt→0 (in this case aδt→ ±U0δ(t′), where δ(t′) is a delta-function), from (11) we can obtain u(τ,β) =U0C0A πRsin2β{/radicalBig y2 L−τ2||τ|≤yL−/radicalBig y2 L−(τ−∆t)2||τ−∆t|≤yL}(13) where yL=Lsinβ C0;U0,∆tare the amplitude and duration of the rectangular velocity impulse. In this case the vertical displacement of the terre strial surface after the earthquake shock is ξ0=U0∆t. In the strict sense, the expression (13) holds true if the condition yL≫δtis satisfied, i.e. with zenith angles β≫β∗≈arcsinC0δt L. Hereδtis the operation duration of the terrestrial shock at the beg inning of the movement and at the stop of the piston. When β≈β∗≪1 , the expression (13) and the expression (12), in view of δt∝ne}ationslash= 0, yield approximately identical signals. What actually happens is that the validity of the expression (13) will break down still earlier, and we are justified in using it only for zenith angle sβ > β∗∗=arctan (L z)> β∗. The curves in Fig. ??b give an idea of the relative amplitude and form of acoustic signals u(τ,β) in the far-field zone of radiation of the piston 2 L= 60 km in diameter. The duration of the rectangular velocity impulse of the pist on was chosen arbitrarily, ∆t= 10 s. The signals correspond to the expression (13) under th e assumption of a homogeneous, A= 1,C=C0≈0.34 km/s, atmosphere. The zenith angles are 13β= 10◦,20◦,40◦,60◦,90◦. The spherical surface R=const serves as a reference. The abscissa axis indicates the time τin seconds, and the axis of ordinates indicates the gas velocity u. In this case the amplitude of the most intense signal ( β= 10◦) is taken to be unity. With increasing β, the amplitude of the signals umaxdecreases, and the duration Tincreases. The leading and trailing edges of the bipolar pul ses in Fig. ??have an equal duration ∆ t. The positive part of the bipolar pulse corresponds to the co m- pression phase of the acoustic wave, and the negative part re fers to the rarefaction phase. The area of the compression phase (in coordinates u,t) equals the largest displacement χ+of a unit volume of the atmosphere in the direction of propaga tion (along the ray) of the wave. A total area of a bipolar pulse is z ero:χ+=−χ−. For acoustic signals, described by the expression (13), the fol lowing useful relations hold true: umax=U02AL πRsinβ/radicalBig η−η2;T= 2yL+ ∆t (14) χ+=ξ0AL 2πRsinβ{/radicalBig 1−η2+1 ηarcsin η };η=∆t 2yL(15) 5.4 The problem of acoustic signal propagation The wave vectors Ktof the bipolar pulses make with the vertical the angles β1= 70◦ andβ2= 50◦. With the adopted values of zeff= 350–400 km, the distances of the corresponding subionospheric points from the earthqua ke epicenters in Fig. ?? are approximately r1= 800 km and r2= 600 km. The rays, constructed in the approximation of linear geometrical acoustics (LGA) and ha ving at the heights z= zeff(C(z=zeff)≈0.9–1 km/s) the propagation angles β1andβ2, correspond to the zenith angle of departure β≈19–21◦andβ≈15–17◦at the level z= 0. The fact that the values of βobtained satisfy the inequality β≤β∗≈25–30◦, is reasonably good agreement with the familiar picture of ra ys from a ground-level point source — the rays with β≥β∗are captured by the atmospheric waveguide z≤z∗= 120 km, and only the rays emitted upward inside the solid ang le Ω∗≈ 1 sterad can penetrate to the heights z > z∗. In standard models of the atmosphere, however, to the values of the angles β1,2(z=zeff) there correspond the locations of subionospheric points lying several hundreds kilometer s nearer to the epicenter compared with the experimental values of r1≈800 km and r2≈600 km. This inconsistency can be due to two reasons. One reason is that the value of zeff≈350–400 km, which we are using, is too low. This is supported by the detection of velocities Vt≈1.2 km/s of traveling disturbances (Table ??) which exceed markedly the sound velocity C≈0.9–1 km/s at the heights of ≈350–400 km. However, it seems likely that such a discrepancy may be disregarded, in view of the errors of the measurement t echnique used (the probability of an additional heating of the upper atmospher e prior to the earthquake cannot be ruled out, however). The increase of the actual value of zeffcan also be associated with a strong dependence (see (14), (15) and Fig. ??b) of the power of the emitted signal on the zenith angle of departure of the ray from the earthquake e picenter. Verifying 14this factor requires a more detailed analysis, based on part icular data on vertical movements of the terrestrial surface in the epicentral zone . Such data are unavailable to us. Below is a discussion only of the second reason for the a bove-mentioned inconsistency as a highly probable one. The second reason may be associated with the violation of the validity conditions of the LGA approximation at a sufficient distance from the sour ce of the acoustic disturbances under discussion. Indeed, the utilization of this approximation is justi- fied until the parameters of the medium and of the wave itself c hange substantially on the size of the first Fresnel zone dF≈√ λlthat determines the physical (trans- verse) size of the ray. Typical wavelengths of the bipolar pu lses under discussion at the heights z=zeffare very large: λ≈300–200 km. Distance lalong the expected ray is of order 900–700 km. Then dF≈520–370 km, which exceeds substantially the scales of variation of atmospheric parameters. The value of dFis actually somewhat smaller, because the typical scale of a disturbance decreas es as it approaches the source. A violation of the LGA approximation at the above-me ntioned distances from the epicentral source occurs also for model signals β≥20◦, shown in Fig. ??b. The increasing violation of the applicability conditions o f the LGA approximation with an increase of limplies the transport of the wave energy not strictly along t he calculated rays but along the lines with a smaller curvature . With a mere estimate of the dilution factor Rin the expressions (13), (14) and (15), in mind, these lines w ill be assumed to be straight when z > z∗and to originate from an imaginary source lying at the height z∗≈120 km above the earthquake epicenter. Such a situation is also clearly manifested in the LGA approximation. At the h eights z > z∗, at t≈600 s, for example, the surface of the wave front from the grou nd-level impulsive source resembles the surface of a hemisphere centered on the point r≈0,z≈z∗. Ultimately the energy that arrives from below inside the sol id angle Ω∗≈1 is scattered into a solid angle Ω ≈2π. From the condition of conservation of wave energy, it is possible to find R1,2=/radicalBig Ω Ω∗/radicalBig (∆z)2+r2 1,2, when ∆ z=zeff−z∗. When using the expressions (14) (15) in the subsequent discu ssion, we will take the quantity R1rather than R, and the value of the zenith angle of departure will be taken to be β= 20◦. These parameters approximately correspond to the generat ion and propagation conditions of the signal from the first earth quake. The typical size of the epicentral zone of this earthquake was about 2 L= 60 km (according to the USGS data: wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov). This same value of Lwas used in calculating the signals shown in Fig. ??b. As is evident even from Fig. ??b (thick line), the duration of the signal, having a zenith angle of departure β= 20◦, is about 70 s. When the signal propagates in the approximation of linear acoustics and with no absorptio n, its form and duration remain unchanging, and only its amplitude does change. In actual conditions the combined effect of the nonlinear att enuation and linear absorption factors leads to a stretching of the bipolar puls e, and to a change of its form (we do not discuss the dispersion factor). In this case t he effect of the nonlin- early factor occurs in such a manner that the integral value o fχ+, (15), calculated as an approximation of linear acoustics, remains as such in t he approximation of nonlinear acoustic as well. Moreover, taking into account t he finite width ∆ Tshof the shock front does not change this situation until ∆ Tsh< T/4. The linear absorp- 15tion factor, in turn, somewhat reduces the true value of χ+because of the mutual diffusion of the compression and rarefaction phases. Nevert heless, for a hypothetical estimation of the earthquake parameters, we shall use the as sumption about the conservation of the value of χ+. As is intimated by Table ??, the mean value of the TEC disturbance amplitude after the first earthquake is AI≈0.14TECU at the equilibrium value of I≈5 TECU . Assuming that on the order of magnitude AI/I≈u/Cfor a maximum gas velocity in the wave, we have an estimate of uexp≈30 m/s. For the sinusoidal form of the bipolar pulse with a duration Texp≈350 s, we find the experimental value of gas displacement along the direction of wave propagation: χ+exp=uexpTexp/π≈3 km. Using the relation χ+exp≈χ+it is possible to estimate the vertical displacement ξ0 of the terrestrial surface in the epicentral zone of the eart hquake. For this purpose, it seems reasonable to introduce the assumption about a short v elocity impulse which models the main earthquake shock, η≪1, although the numerical value of χ+is virtually independent of the value of η(15). In view of the above considerations, we then obtain: ξ0≈χ+expπR1sinβ/ (AL). (16) The uncertainty in the determination of ξ0is caused both by the uncertainty of the true values of the quantities involved in this relation a nd by the limitations of the acoustic signal generation model itself. In this case, o f the greatest importance is the dependence of ξ0on the value of the acoustic parameter A, containing the atmospheric density ρat the effective height z=zeffwhich we have introduced artificially. The employment of the MSISE90 atmospheric mod el (Hedin, 1991), calculated for the location and time of the first earthquake, gives the values of ξ0≈60,40 and 25 cm, with the values of zeff= 350 ,400 and 450 km, respectively. In all cases it was assumed that R1≈850√ 2πkm,β= 20◦,L= 30 km. The possibility of a vertical displacement of the terrestrial s urface in the epicentral zone by several tens of centimeters seems real. In particular, (C alais and Minster, 1995) give the value of ξ0≈40 cm at the epicenter Mw=6.7 of the Northridge earthquake (California, 1994). As follows from the expressions (14), maximum values of disp lacements and of the velocity of the neutral atmospheric species are attained di rectly above the earthquake epicenter. The signal duration is minimal, and does not seem to exceed a few tens of seconds at ionospheric heights. Since the wave vector of the disturbance is directed predominantly upward, the method of oblique-incidence ion ospheric sounding in this case is a technique of choice for determining the waveform. 6 Conclusion In this paper we have investigated the form and dynamics of sh ock-acoustic waves (SAW) generated during earthquakes. We have developed a met hod of determin- ing the SAW parameters (including angular characteristics of the wave vector and the phase velocity of the SAW, as well as the direction toward the source) using GPS arrays whose elements can be chosen out of a large set of th e global network GPS stations. Unlike existing radio techniques, the propos ed method estimates the 16SAW parameters without a priori information about the locat ion and time of the earthquake. The implementation of the method is exemplified by an analysis of ionospheric effects of the earthquakes in Turkey in 1999. It was found that, in spite of the difference of the earthquake characteristics, the local time, the season, and of the level of geomagnetic di sturbance, for both earthquakes the ionospheric response has the character of a nN-wave. The SAW period is 180–390 s, and their amplitude of 0.2 TECU exceeds by a factor of 2 as a minimum the standard deviation of background fluctuations of the TEC in this range of periods under quiet and moderate geomagnetic condi tions. As has been pointed out in the Introduction, some investigat ors report markedly differing values of the SAW propagation velocity — by as much a s several thousands m/s, which is beyond the values of the sound velocity at the SA W propagation heights in the atmosphere. The method proposed in this paper opens up a possibility of determining the angular characteristics of the wave vect orKtand, accordingly, of estimating Vt. According to our data (Table ??), the elevation of the SAW wave vector varied within 20–44◦, and the phase velocity of the SAW varied from 1100 to 1300 m/s. We determine the phase velocity of the equal TEC line at the height of the ionospheric F-region maximum which makes the m ain contribution to variations of the TEC between the receiver and the GPS satell ite, and corresponds to the region of maximum sensitivity of the method. Since Vtapproaches the sound velocity at these heights this makes it possible to identify the sound origin of the TEC disturbance. The SAW source location, calculated witho ut taking into account the refraction corrections, approximately corresponds to the earthquake epicenter. We hope that the study made in this paper will provide better i nsights into the physical processes occurring in the Earth’s atmosphere dur ing earthquakes. Fur- thermore, this will make it possible to find the more reliable signal signatures of technogenic influences which are needed for the constructio n of an effective global radio subsystem for detection and localization of these infl uences, based on a treat- ment of the data from the international network of two-frequ ency receivers of the GPS-GLONASS navigation systems. 7 Acknowledgements We are indebted to G. M. Kuznetsova and A. V. Tashchilin for th eir calculation of the atmospheric parameters at the time of the earthquakes, a s well as to E. A. Pono- marev, V. V. Evstafiev, P. M. Nagorsky, N. N. Klimov, and A. D. K alikhman for their interest in this study, many pieces of useful advice, a nd active participation in discussions. Thanks are also due to V. G. Mikhalkosky for his assistance in preparing the English version of the manuscript. This work was done wit h support from both the Russian foundation for Basic Research (grant 99-05-647 53) and RFBR grant of leading scientific schools of the Russian Federation No. 00- 15-98509. References [1]Afraimovich, E.L., I.I. Varshavsky, B.O. Vugmeister, et al .. Influence of surface industrial explosions on Doppler and angular cha racteristics of the 17ionosphere-reflected radio signal, Geomagnetizm i aeronomiya ,24, 322–324 (in Russian) 1984. [2]Afraimovich, E.L., A.I. Terechov, M.Yu. Udodov, and S.V. Fr idman . Refraction distortions of transionospheric radio signals caused by changes in a regular ionosphere and by travelling ionospheric disturba nces,J. Atmos. Terr. Phys.,54, 1013–1020, 1992. [3]Afraimovich, E.L., K.S. Palamartchouk, and N.P. Perevalov a. GPS ra- dio interferometry of travelling ionospheric disturbance s,J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. , 60, 1205–1223, 1998. [4]Afraimovich E. L., E.A. Kosogorov, and A.V. Plotnikov . The detection of the shock-acoustic waves generated during rocket launch ings using GPS- arrays. Proceedings of IV International conference ”Radiolocatio n, navigation and communication”, April 22-27 ,part 1 , 462–474, 2000. [5]Bertel, L., F. Bertin, and J. Testud . De la mesure du contenu electronique integre appliquee a l’observation des ondes de gravite de mo yenne echelle, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. ,38, 261–270, 1976. [6]Blanc, E., and A.R. Jacobson . Observation of ionospheric disturbances following a 5-kt chemical explosion. 2. Prolonged anomalie s and stratifications in the lower thermosphere after shock passage, Radio Sci. ,24, 739–746, 1989. [7]Calais, E. and J.B. Minster . GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations fol- lowing the January 1994, Northridge earthquake, Geoph. Res. Lett. ,22, 1045– 1048, 1995. [8]Calais, E., and J.B. Minster . GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations following a Space Shuttle ascent, Geoph. Res. Lett. ,23, 1897–1900, 1996. [9]Calais, E., J.B. Minster, M.A. Hofton, and M.A.H. Hedlin . Ionospheric signature of surface mine blasts from Global Positioning Sy stem measurements, Geoph. J. Int. ,132, 191–202, 1998. [10]Davies, K. ,Ionospheric radio waves . Blaisdell Publishing Company. A Divi- sion of Ginn and Company, Waltham, Massachusetts-Toronto- London, 1969. [11]Fitzgerald, T.J. , Observations of total electron content perturbations on G PS signals caused by a ground level explosion, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. ,59, 829–834, 1997. [12]Golitsyn G.S. and V.I. Klyatskin . Vibrations in the atmosphere caused by movements of the terrestrial surface, Izv. Akademii nauk SSSR, Fizika atmos- fery I okeana ,111, 1044-1052, 1967. [13]Hedin, A.E. , Extension of the MSIS thermosphere model into the middle an d lower atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res. ,96, 1152-1172, 1991. [14]Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., H. Lichtenegger, and J. Collins .Global Posi- tioning System: Theory and Practice , Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, 1992. 18[15]Jacobson, A.R., and R.C. Carlos . Observations of acoustic–gravity waves in the thermosphere following Space Shuttle ascents, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. ,56, 525–528, 1994. [16]Klobuchar, J.A. , Real-time ionospheric science: The new reality, Radio Sci- ence,32, 1943–1952, 1997. [17]Li, Y.Q., A.R. Jacobson, R.C. Carlos, R.S. Massey, Y.N. Tara nenko, and G. Wu . The blast wave of the Shuttle plume at ionospheric heights, Geoph. Res. Lett. ,21, 2737–2740, 1994. [18]Mendillo, M. , The effects of rocket launches of the ionosphere, Adv. Space Res.,1, 275–290, 1981. [19]Mendillo, M. , Modification of the ionosphere by large space vehicles, Adv. Space Res. ,2, 150–159, 1982. [20]Mercier, C. and A.R. Jacobson . Observations of atmospheric gravity waves by radio interferometry: are results biased by the observat ional technique, An- nales Geophysicae ,15, 430–442, 1997. [21]Nagorsky, P.M. , The inhomogeneous structure of the ionospheric F-region produced by rockets, Geomagnetizm i aeronomiya ,38, 100–106 (in Russian), 1998. [22]Orlov V.V., and A.M. Uralov . Atmospheric response to the Rayleigh wave generated by an earthquake, In: Issledovaniya po geomagnetismu, aeronomii i fizike Solntsa , Moscow: Nauka, 78, 28-40, 1987, [23]Row R.V. , Acoustic-gravity waves in the upper atmosphere due to a nuc lear detonation and an earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. ,72, 1599-1610, 1967. [24]Rudenko G. V., A.M. Uralov . Calculation of ionospheric effects due to acousticradiation from an undeground nuclear explosion, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. , 57, 225-236, 1995. 1924 27 30 33 36 39 Longitude (E)30323436384042Latitude (N)/G37/G38/G35/G2E/G28/G3C/G03/G28/G24/G35/G37/G2B/G34/G38/G24/G2E/G28/G36 17.08.99; 00:01:39 UT; 40.70 N, 29.99 E; 7.4 Mw 12.11.99; 16:57:20 UT; 40.79 N, 31.11 E; 7.1 Mw ANKR NICO BSHM GILB TELA RAMObshm; prn 6KABRKATZDAY 229 K1 K2DAY 316 gilb; prn 30Fig/. /1 /: Exp erimen tal geometry during the earthquak es in T urk ey /. Crossessho w the p ositions of the earthquak e epicen ters/. Solid curv es represen t the tra jec/-tories of the subionospheric p oin ts for eac h GPS satellite at the heigh t hmax /=/4/0/0km/. Dark diamonds along the tra jectories corresp ond to the co ordinates of thesubionospheric p oin ts at time tp of a maxim um deviation of the TEC/. Hea vy dotsand large lettering sho w the lo cation and the names of the GPS stations /, whilelo w er/-case letters along the tra jectories refer to station names and PRN n um b ersof the GPS satellites/. Asterisks mark the source lo cation at /0 km altitude inferredfrom the data from the GPS arra ys/. Num b ers at the asterisks corresp ond to theresp ectiv e da y n um b ers/. Straigh t dashed lines that connect the exp ected sourceand the subionospheric p oin t represen t the horizon tal pro jection of the w a v e v ec/-tor Kt /. The scaling of the co ordinate axes is c hosen from considerations of anappro ximate equalit y of the linear dimensions along the latitude and longitude/.T able /1 /: GPS/-sites and lo cationN Sites Geograph/.latitude Geograph/.longitudeT urk ey/1 ANKR /3/9/./8/8/7 /3/2/./7/5/9/2 BSHM /3/2/./7/7/8 /3/5/./0/2/2/3 GILB /3/2/./4/7/9 /3/5/./4/1/6/4 KABR /3/3/./0/2/2 /3/5/./1/4/5/5 KA TZ /3/2/./9/9/5 /3/5/./6/8/8/6 NICO /3/5/./1/4/1 /3/3/./3/9/6/7 RAMO /3/0/./5/9/7 /3/4/./7/6/3/8 TELA /3/2/./0/6/7 /3/4/./7/8/00.00.20.40.60.80510 0.00.20.40.6-0.160.000.1617.017.217.40510 17.017.217.4-0.120.000.12I(t), 1016 m-2 a. b. c.1291 141 29 YAKAFAIR 0.00.20.40.6 UT, hour-0.050.000.05 17.017.217.4 UT, hour-0.030.000.03 MAC1 PRN22PRN29F(t), Hz F(t), Hz I(t), 1016 m-2 BSHM ; PRN 6 GILB ; PRN 30 DAY 229 BSHM GILB GILB KABRKATZ TELAΔ Δ DAY 228 DAY 315 PRN 6 PRN 30DAY 228 DAY 230 17.08.99 12.11.99 Turkey Earthquake Turkey Earthquake I(t), 1016 m-2 I(t), 1016 m-2 DAY 316DAY 317DAY 315d. e. f.DAY 230 DAY 317BSHM ; PRN 6 GILB ; PRN 30 DAY 229 DAY 316Fig/. /2 /: Time dep endencies of /"oblique/" TEC I /( t /) at one of the three sitesof the GPS/-arra y in the area of the earthquak es on August /1/7 and No v em b er /1/2/,/1/9/9/9/, on the da y of earthquak e /(hea vy curv e/)/, and one da y b efore and one da yafter the ev en t /(thin curv es/) /| panels a/, d/. P anels b/, e /| for the same da ys butthe TEC v ariations /
I /( t /) with the linear trend remo v ed and with a smo othingwith a time windo w of /5 min/; panels c/, f /| v ariations of the frequency Dopplershift F /( t /) /"reduced/" to the sounding signal frequency of /1/3/6 MHz/, for three sitesof the arra ys/, da ys of earthquak e/. All panels sho w da y n um b ers/, GPS stationnames/, and PRN n um b ers of the GPS satellites/.T able /2 /: General information ab out T urk ey earth/-quak esN Epicen ter Data t/0/(UT/) Depth/(km/) Magnitudem b Ms Mw DST/(nT/)/1 /4/0/./7/0 N/, /2/9/./9/9 E Aug/. /1/7 /1/9/9/9 /(D A Y /2/2/9/) /0/0/:/0/1/:/3/9 /1/7 /6/./3 /7/./8 /7/./4 /-/1/4/2 /4/0/./7/9 N/, /3/1/./1/1 E No v/. /1/2 /1/9/9/9 /(D A Y /3/1/6/) /1/6/:/5/7/:/2/0 /1/0 /6/./5 /7/./5 /7/./1 /-/4/4ξ ξ0 ttt U a δtδtΔtU0a. b.Fig/. /3 /: a/. Mo del time dep endence /(from top to b ottom/) of the v erticaldisplacemen t / /, the v elo cit y U /= d/ /=dt and the acceleration a /= dU /=dt of theterrestrial surface in the epicen tral zone of the earthquak e/. b/. Acoustic signalsu /( / /; / /) in the far/-/eld radiation zone of the piston /2 L /= /6/0 km in diameter/.The piston/'s v elo cit y has the form of a rectangular impulse of a duration /
t /=/1/0 s/. The signals corresp ond to the expression /(/1/3/) under the assumption of ahomogeneous atmosphere/; A /= /1/, and C /= C/0 / /0 /: /3/4 km//s/. The zenith anglesare / /= /1/0 //; /2/0 //; /4/0 //; /6/0 //, and /9/0 //. The abscissa axis indicates the time / inseconds/, and the axis of ordinates indicates the gas v elo cit y u /. The amplitude ofthe strongest signal / /= /1/0 /is tak en to b e unit y /.T able /3 /: The parameters of sho c k/-acoustic w a v esNo/. Sites tp/(UT/) /
t /,sec/. T /,sec/. AI /,TECU AF /,Hz / /; ///; /Vh /,m//s Vt /,m//s V/ /,m//s /'w /; //w /; / /
tw /,sec/./1/9/9/9 Aug/. /1/7/; t/0 /=/0/0/:/0/1/:/3/9 UT/1 KABRBSHMKA TZ /0/0/:/2/1/:/0/4/0/0/:/2/1/:/1/9 /1/1/6/5/1/1/8/0 /3/6/0/3/0/0 /0/./1/5/0/./1/4 /0/./0/3/7/0/./0/4/9 /2/4/./9 /1/5/5 /1/2/9/6 /1/1/7/4 /8/7/3/8/6/2 /3/9/./6/2/6/./4 /7/2 GILBKA TZBSHM /0/0/:/2/1/:/5/4 /1/2/1/5 /3/9/0 /0/./1/2 /0/./0/4/3 /2/6/./1 /1/5/4 /1/3/0/7 /1/1/7/4 /8/6/8 /3/9/./1/2/5/./9 /1/2/3 KA TZKABRGILB /0/0/:/2/1/:/2/3 /1/1/8/4 /3/6/0 /0/./1/9 /0/./0/5 /2/5/./1 /1/5/5 /1/3/0/3 /1/1/7/9 /8/5/4 /3/9/./5/2/6/./4 /1/5/4 TELABSHMGILB /0/0/:/2/2/:/1/4 /1/2/3/5 /3/6/0 /0/./1 /0/./0/2/6 /1/9/./9 /1/6/1 /1/2/3/8 /1/1/6/4 /8/9/4 /4/1/./5/2/6/./1 /1/3/5 P/3/5/4 /0/./1/4 /0/./0/4 /2/4/./1 /1/5/6 /1/2/8/6 /1/1/7/3 /8/7/0 /3/9/./9/2/6/./2 /1/2/1/9/9/9 No v/. /1/2/; t/0 /=/1/6/:/5/7/:/2/0 UT/6 KABRBSHMGILB /1/7/:/1/2/:/5/8/1/7/:/1/3/:/2/1 /9/3/8/9/6/1 /1/8/0/1/8/0 /0/./0/6/0/./0/7 /0/./0/2/7/0/./0/2/1 /2/9/./5 /1/9/4 /1/2/8/5 /1/1/1/9 /8/0/7/7/8/7 /4/2/./2/3/0/./1 /7/8/7 TELAKABRGILB /1/7/:/1/4/:/0/9 /1/0/0/9 /2/1/0 /0/./0/9/7 /0/./0/2/1 /4/3/./8 /1/8/0 /1/4/8/7 /1/0/7/3 /8/3/8 /3/9/./4/2/8/./6 /1/1/3/8 GILBBSHMTELA /1/7/:/1/3/:/3/9 /9/7/9 /2/1/0 /0/./0/9 /0/./0/2/2 /3/9/./6 /1/8/4 /1/6/6/3 /1/2/8/0 /8/1/7 /4/0/./1/2/9/./1 /6/5/9 P/1/9/5 /0/./0/7/9 /0/./0/2/3 /3/7/./6 /1/8/6 /1/4/7/8 /1/1/5/7 /8/1/2 /4/0/./5/2/9/./2 /8/5 /1

arXiv:physics/0007042v1 [physics.pop-ph] 13 Jul 2000A realistic quasi-physical model of the 100 metre dash J. R. Mureika1 Department of Physics University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario Canada M5S 1A7 PACS No. : Primary 01.80; Secondary: 02.60L Keywords: Mathematical modeling, sprinting, wind/altitude assista nce, Track and Field Abstract A quasi-physical model (having both physical and mathemati cal roots) of sprint perfor- mances is presented, accounting for the influence of drag mod ification via wind and altitude variations. The race time corrections for both men and women sprinters are discussed, and theoretical estimates for the associated drag areas are presented. The corrections are consistent with constant-wind estimates of previous autho rs, however those for variable wind are more accentuated for this model. As a practical exam ple, the nullified World Record and 1988 Olympic 100 m race of Ben Johnson is studied, a nd compared with the present World Record of 9.79 s. 1 Introduction Mathematical models of athletic sprinting/running perfor mances, in some form or another, date back to at least the early 1900s. A. V. Hi ll [1] was one of the pioneers to study a sprinter’s “velocity curve”, or i.e.the runner’s speed as a function of time. Mathematician Joseph Keller [2] formulated a simplistic model to predict potential race times over a vari ety of distances. His method involved optimizing the set of coupled differenti al equations ˙d(t) = v(t) ˙v(t) = f(t)−α v(t), (1) with the race distance calculated as the integral d=/integraldisplayT 0v(t)dt . (2) In Equation (1), αis a decay constant which places upper limitations on maximum velocities and velocity profiles. Solutions are obt ained by solving Equation 2 subject to the initial conditions v(0) = 0, d(0) = 0. Keller’s orig- inal model for sprint races proposed a constant propulsive f orce,f(t) =F, 1arguing that the athlete must use his/her entire strength to maximize their performance. In the works of Tibshirani [3] and Mureika [4], the propul- sive term is adjusted to vary with time, since such intense ph ysical exertion will inevitably introduce muscular fatigue. Explicitly, a linear decrease was chosen, f(t) =F−c t, where c >0. 2 Quasi-physical model While Tibshirani’s model yields an approximate match of fina l times, it does not completely represent a simulation of an actual race. A re alistic model of a sprint race should be able to accurately reproduce the crit ical 10 m split data which is available2. In order to better realize this approximation, the equation of motion (1) is modified as follows: ˙v(t) =fs+fm−fv−fd. (3) The term “quasi-physical” has been adopted to highlight the fact that Equa- tion (3) is actually a mix of both mathematical and physical c omponents. It is not a fully physical representation, nor is is a purely mat hematical model, although it can be used to effectively study and estimate key p hysical quan- tities (such as the elusive drag area of sprinters). The components of Equation (3) are defined in the following su bsections. 2.1 Drive term fs A sprint race can be broken into roughly three different phase s: the drive, transition, and maintenance phases. Previous models of spr int performances (e.g.[2, 3, 4] and references therein) assign a singular propulsi ve term in the equation of motion. These do not explicitly account for t he drive phase, in which a sprinter begins a race from a crouched start. From t his position, the athlete is able to achieve greater speed due to increased application of forces (efficient drive posture). This phase of the race lasts for only about the first 25-30 metres, at which time the sprinter has transit ioned to an upright running stance. In the current model the following form of the drive term is ad opted: 2A “split” is defined as the elapsed time at each 10 m division of the race, or the time- interval in which a 10 m stretch is covered. The athlete’s ins tantaneous velocities may be obtained for each 10 m increment, but due to technological an d financial restrictions, this type of data is currently rare. 2fs=f0exp(−σ t2), (4) where f0is the magnitude of the drive, and σa constant to be determined. Thet2dependence ensures that the term drops off rapidly as the race pro- gresses. In fact, after roughly t= 3 seconds, the magnitude of the term drops to less than 0 .1% of its original value, which would correspond roughly to the appropriate distance described above. 2.2 Maintenance term fm This term is left relatively intact from the previous models , but assumes a slightly different interpretation. Once the drive term has d issipated, this term is the only remaining propulsive component of Equation 3, and repre- sents the maintenance phase of the race. Explicitly, fm=f1exp(−c t). (5) Note that, unlike the linear maintenance term assumed in [3, 4], the time- dependence assumed herein is non-negative ∀t. Certainly, this is a much more realistic assumption. Due to the adoption of the drive term (4), the value of f1tends to be lower than predicted in previous models. While this does not immediately effect predictions for 100 metre performances, it does have s ignificant impli- cations for 200 metre dash simulations (for which previous m odels have made rather generous performance predictions; these are discus sed in detail in a forthcoming article [5]). This difference is further discus sed in Section 3.3. 2.3 Velocity term fv The first of two counter-propulsive terms, the velocity term is another relic of the original Keller model, which accounts for a predicted v(t) dependence in the equation of motion. Such a term has some conceivable ph ysical inter- pretations: there must exist a physical barrier which limit s the maximum speed of a human, based more than just on pure muscular streng th. It seems logical to assume that a sprinter’s acceleration is curtail ed with increasing speed ( e.g.leg-turnover or stride rate are physically and physiologic ally- constrained quantities). The term is written fv=α v(t), (6) 3withα >0 a positive constant. A reasonable assumption might be that the value of this parameter (based on the interpretation abo ve) is a “physi- ological constant” for most sprinters, and should not vary s ignificantly from a prescribed value. Most world-class sprinters show stride -rates of about 4-5 strides/second (see e.g.the analysis in [6]). 2.4 Drag term fd Along with the drive term, this is the most significant adjust ment to the model. Explicitly, fd=/parenleftbigg 1−1 4exp{−σ t2}/parenrightbigg ρ(H)Ad(v(t)−w)2. (7) The athlete is thus modeled as a thin slab of frontal cross-se ctional area A, which is a sufficient approximation for the effects considere d herein. A critical factor in (7) is the “modified drag area” Ad=Cd·A/M. Here, Cdthe drag coefficient, and Mthe sprinter’s mass (since these models are expressed in force per unit mass). The exact values of these parameters are unknown, since they can only be measured experimentally. Previous wo rks [7, 8] have suggested that Afalls around 0 .45 m2. Additionally, these authors suggest that the drag coefficient Cdassumed a value on the order of 0 .9−1.0, but a recent suggestion by Linthorne [9] pegs the value as closer to 0.6. The data obtained from this model is consistent with this statem ent, and in fact indicates that Cdmay assume an even lower value (see Section 3). The expression (1 −1/4 exp( −σ t2)) in (7) is designed as an initial cor- rection to the cross-sectional area A, representative of the transition from a crouched to upright position. Although the value 1 /4 is purely subjective, the actual magnitude of the correction does not significantl y affect the re- sults. It does, however, allow for a slightly greater accele ration over the first 10 m, and is a more realistic assumption than having a constan tA. The important of an ambient wind in a sprint race is exemplifie d by this term, since its magnitude is a function of ( v(t)−w)2. Any non-zero tail- wind reduces the effective drag experience by the sprinter, a llowing him/her greater acceleration, a greater top speed, and hence a faste r overall time. A positive wind-speed corresponds to a tail-wind ( i.e.wind in the direction of motion of the sprinter), while a negative wind-speed denote s a head-wind. The IAAF (International Amateur Athletic Federation) has a dopted a limit of +2.0 ms−1for a supporting wind, above which a race is deemed “wind- assisted” [10]. Since such times are not recognized as legal performances, they cannot be ratified as World Records. 4Wind-speed has the dominant effect on drag, but an additional factor which affects this term is the atmospheric density, ρ(H), where ρ(H) =ρ0exp(−0.000125 H). (8) Here, ρ0= 1.184 gm−3is the sea-level density at 25 degrees Celsius, and His the measured elevation/altitude (in metres) (Dapena and Feltner [16] propose a second-order-in- Hcorrection to the altitude, which is not included here). Races which are run at altitudes above H= 1000 m are deemed altitude- assisted, but unlike wind-assisted marks, these can be rati fied as records. For example, at the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City ( H≈2250 m), World Records were set in both the 100 m and 200 m dashes, thanks to the consid erable altitude (the density of air in Mexico City is roughly 76% of ρ0). Pietro Mennea’s former 200 m record of 19.72 s was also set at altitud e. Further- more, the fastest-ever recorded 100 m clocking is 9.69 secon ds by Obadele Thompson of Barbados, in April 1996 (at which time the official World Record was 9.85 s). This race was run in El Paso, Texas ( H≈1300 m) with a tail-wind of +5 .7 ms−1. Thompson’s previous 100 m performances were all slower than 10.00 s, which serves to demonstrate the extr emal benefits of drag reduction. 3 Model parameters and simulation results The coupled equations (3) and ˙d(t) =v(t) cannot be solved analytically, so one must resort to numerical methods. Thanks to the significa nt increase in modern processor speeds, the values of the parameters ( f0,σ); (f1,c);α; Adcan be rapidly isolated. This was done using a fourth-fifth or der Runge- Kutta integration scheme (written in C) run on a 500 MHz Penti um III processor supporting Linux 6.0. An iterative time-step of 0 .001 s was chosen for the integration. In order to determine extremal parameters for the model, key 10 m split data for several world class 100 m races are matched. Such dat a has been obtained at various world-class track meets, including the 1997 and 1999 World Championships in Athletics [11, 12], as well as the 198 8 Olympic Games [6]. The instantaneous velocity splits obtained in [1 1] were measured with a laser-based device known as a LAVEG, which collects it s data by sensing the reflectivity of 20 ns, 904 nm pulses directed at a ( linearly) re- ceding target. The cited reliability of the distance measur ements is ±1 cm, at a sampling rate of up to 100 measurements per second [13]. 5After repeated numerical runs and adjustments to the parame ters, the following set was obtained: (f0,σ) = (6 .10,2.22); (f1,c,α) = (5 .15,0.0385,0.3225); Ad= 0.002875; Also, w= 0.0 ms−1;H= 0 m. The simulation results are displayed in Table 1, and yield a raw ( i.e.excluding reaction3) time of 9.70 s, with a maximum velocity of 11 .845 ms−1at 59.18 m. Such figures are in agreement with actual world class sprinters running sub-9.90 second r aces to better than±0.01s, with the instantaneous velocity splits also matching to wi thin 1 % of the actual value (see e.g.the data in [11]). Of course, each individual sprinter would most likely be des cribed by a unique set of parameters, and such a task is not within the imm ediate scope of this paper. Also, due to the nature of the drag term (7), the effects of cross-winds are not considered in the current form of the mod el. The drive-phase correction (4) is necessary to accurately r eproduce the observed velocity profile over the first 30-40 metres. For exa mple, the ve- locity profiles presented in [4] for sprinter Donovan Bailey of Canada give 9.32 ms−1(10 m), 10.95 ms−1(20 m), 11.67 ms−1(30 m), and 11.99 ms−1 (40 m). These velocity figures are doubtful, in light of the pr ofiles presented by actual split data [11]. It is unlikely that Bailey achieve d a speed of 11.99 ms−1as early as 40 m, and furthermore sustained speeds in excess o f 12 ms−1for an additional 40 m [4]. 3.1 Wind assistance: determination of the drag coefficient and frontal cross-sectional area The value of Adis isolated in conjunction with the measured effect of wind assistance by past authors [2, 14, 15], most of whom agree tha t a tail-wind of +2.0 ms−1will boost a 10 s 100 m sprint by about 0 .1 s. The results of an earlier study [16] cite corrections of −0.07 s for a +2 ms−1wind, although one of the authors has since produced updated results which a re more com- mensurate with the literature [17]. Table 1 also shows the eff ects of such a tail-wind on the predicted 100 m times, and accordingly pred icts a boost of 0.104s. Conversely, a head-wind of equal magnitude ( w=−2.0 ms−1) will increase the time by 0 .130 s to 9.830 s. Clearly, the non-linear nature of 3Although they depend on the individual athlete and the condi tions at the time of the race, reaction times tend to range between 0 .12−0.17 s. Reaction times below 0 .100 s are not allowed, as it is believed that it is not physiologically possible to surpass this limit. 6the drag term implies that equal but opposite wind speeds wil l not provide equal boosts. It is reasonable to assume that there could be m ild variations in these corrections, depending on variations in Ad, but a full study of this effect is not the aim of this paper. For a sprinter of mass 80 kg, the value Ad= 0.002875 indicates that the effective drag area is A·Cd= 0.23 m2. Note that this is slightly less than the 0.3 m2estimate of Linthorne [18]. For a cross-sectional area betw een 0.40− 0.50 m2, this suggests that the drag coefficient is between 0.46 and 0. 57. Note that it may actually be erroneous to assume that the drag coefficient is constant, since the could potentially be frequent transi tions to laminar flow occurring throughout the race. Also, the drag area may va ry slightly from athlete to athlete. It should be noted that while these simulation times are reco rded to 0.001 seconds, official race times are reported to only 0.01 s, and official wind gauge readings to 0.1 ms−1. In actual fact, electronic/photo-finish timing is recorded to 0.001 s, and the following “rounding-u p” algorithm is applied to the times: unless the third decimal place is 0, t he hundredth position is rounded up. For example, Canadian sprinters Don ovan Bailey and Bruny Surin have both recorded 100 m times of 9.84 s, but th eir pre- rounded times were actually 9.835 s and 9.833 s respectively [15]. A time of 9.831 s would be reported as 9.84 s, while 9.830 s would earn a 9.83 s rounding. The reported value is measured from a gauge of height no more t han 1.22 m, placed within 2 m from lane 1 on the in-field at a distanc e of 50 m from the finish line. The wind-speed is sampled for a duration of 10 s from the start of the race [10]. Wind speeds are measured to 0.01 ms−1, but are rounded in a similar fashion. However, Linthorne [19] has re cently noted that measuring the wind speed in such a fashion gives an error of ±0.7 ms−1on the actual value. Such a discrepancy would certainly impact the validity of the reported times. 3.2 Altitude effects Although altitude effects are secondary insofar as drag modi fication is con- cerned, their influence is not negligible. Table 2 demonstra tes the modifica- tions to the times of Table 1, subject to an increasing elevat ion. Non-zero wind effects are not included, but will be discussed in detail later on. The model predicts an advantage of 0 .069 seconds from sea level to a 2000 me- tre elevation. For a “Mexico City” altitude (approximately 2250 m), the correction to this 100 m time (with no wind) would be 0 .075 s, in rough 7agreement with the predictions of Linthorne [14] and Dapena [17]. It should be noted that the correction figures given in Reference [15] a re considered to be overestimated, due to an inaccurate value of the drag ar ea. 3.3 Graphical analysis of propulsive forces While hypothesized from a mathematical basis, the quasi-ph ysical model herein provides accurate matches to real data. A study of the propulsive forces reveals a striking agreement to that presented by Dap ena and Felt- ner [16]. Although their analysis is for 10.90 s-caliber spr inters, the figures presented herein for sub-10 s sprinters show the same overal l structure. The authors suggest that a plot of mass-normalized propulsive f orce versus the athlete’s velocity can be modeled by two straight lines, adj oined at a “bound- ary velocity” roughly 3-5 ms−1less than maximum. Figure 5 demonstrates the identical analysis for the model p arameters listed in Section 3. Unlike Dapena and Feltner’s model, the a cceleration is highly non-linear before 4 ms−1, at which point it assumes a roughly linear form to about 7 ms−1. The “boundary velocity” in this case is representa- tive of the point where the drive term fdhas dropped to roughly 10 % of its original value (about 1 second into the race). At this poi nt, the curve assumes another linear form of differing slope, before appro aching the max- imum velocity (and again diverging from linearity). Such an analysis can in fact be used to rule out the Keller mode l and its variants. Although Keller’s value of Fwas in the 12 .1 ms−2range [2], the overall form of the function does not provide an adequate glo bal match. Similarly, using Tibshirani’s modification [3], the statis tical fit of race data from Donovan Bailey’s 1996 Olympic 100 m race [4] predic ted an initial f(0) = Fvalue of 7.96 (Tibshirani’s own analysis predicted a lower v alue of 6.41, almost half that of Keller). These models are also pr esented in Figure 5, and are representative of roughly a 9.8-10 second r ace. On their own these two approximations do not support the predictions of the quasi- physical model, however it is interesting to note that Kelle r’s model before, and the Tibshirani-Mureika model after their intersection are a rough first- order approximation to the data. In fact, this is similar to l inear model proposed in [16]. 3.4 Assistance for women sprinters Women sprinters are certainly lighter than an average 80 kg, yet their cross- sectional area is correspondingly smaller. Similarly, the ir stride rates tend to 8be lower. Thus, a first-pass approximation for women can be ma de by a mild adjustment to the parameters of Equation (3). Following the interpretation of Section 2.3, a lower stride rate can be taken to correspond to higher α. Similarly, adjustments to the propulsive terms are reasona bly made. By setting f0= 5.60;f1= 4.57;c= 0.037;α= 0.32, and Ad= 0.00275 m2 (which corresponds to a drag area of 0.18 m2for a mass of 65 kg), one can reproduce splits which roughly replicate those observed by world class fe- male sprinter Marion Jones (see [11]), and match the predict ed wind and altitude advantages of [17] and [14]. For the cited drag area , a drag coeffi- cient between 0.5-0.6 would require a cross-sectional area of 0.30-0.36 m2, roughly 80% that of men (a reasonable approximation). Using these values gives a raw time of 10.653 s. At sea-level ( H= 0 m), an advantage of 0 .117 s is predicted for a tail-wind of +2 .0 ms−1(10.536 s), and 0.086 s for H= 2500 m. These figures are again in close agreement with those of [17] and Linthorne [14], who predicts a correction o f 0.12±0.02 s. A wind of −2.0 ms−1atH= 0 m will increase the time to 10.802 s, a difference of 0 .149 s. Figures 1,2,3, and 4 give performance corrections for men an d women, for altitudes ranging between H= 0−2500 m. The sign of the correction indicates the impact of the associated wind and altitude on t hebasetimet0 at 0 m altitude and 0-wind, i.e.∆t=tw−t0. A negative correction indicates that the time twis faster than the base ( e.g.for tail winds), and vice versa (note the change in sign relative to the Tables). The predict ed corrections for women cannot be applied to slower men’s races, since the a ssumed drag area is much lower. If the modified drag area is kept as 0.00287 5 m2kg−1, the resulting boost is 0 .122 s for a +2 .0 ms−1wind and a lapse of 0 .154 s for a−2.0 ms−1wind. 4 Sensitivity to parameter variation 4.1 Correction for late-race velocity drop-off The measured velocity data presented in Reference [11] indi cate that the model predictions drop off faster than the measured data for t he latter half of the race. It should be noted that this discrepancy can be ac counted for by lowering the power of tin maintenance term (5), and hence the overall shape of the associated “energy envelope”. In fact, the auth or notes that a substitution t→tβ, with β∼0.95−0.98 (and mild adjustments to f1) provides a closer match to the data. While such modifications are of interest to providing a fully realistic 9simulation, variation of this parameter is an over-complic ation of an already- intricate model, and is not essential for the study conducte d herein. A full study of such time dependence is postponed for future wo rk, and in particular its implications for the 200 m dash are discussed in [5]. Furthermore, it was noted that variation of the ( f1,α,c) parameters did not significantly affect the velocity profile in the early part of the race, but could be used to adjust the late-race profile. Individual adj ustments of these parameters to produce a 0.1 s advantage in the final time prese nted minimal effects on the profile for d <50 m. Conceivably, individual athletes could be represented by their own set of parameters, which could he lp account for variability in observed race times. Despite these minor vel ocity adjustments over 60-100 m, a +2 .0 ms−1assisting wind again provided boosts between 0.101−0.103 s. 4.2 Slow starts and the time dependence of fs It is possible to use the model to simulate “slow starts” by su itable read- justment of the drive term parameters. In fact, by modifying the time- dependence of Equation 4, one may reproduce starts in which a thletes did not accelerate as quickly as others, but achieved higher ove rall velocities at each split in the earlier portions of the race. Figure 6 demonstrates such a simulation, with adjusted time -dependence fd=f1exp(−σ t), and σ= 1.68, as compared to the simulation of Section 3. The simulated splits are shown in Table 4; such data is consis tent in pro- file with those of Canadian sprinter Donovan Bailey from the 1 997 World Championships in Athens [11]. One can note this simulation l ags behind the other until about 70 metres, although achieving higher m aximal veloc- ities. In this case, the finish is within 0.005 seconds. This t ype of behavior is frequently observable at any competition, and is charact eristic of many famous world class sprinters (including the aforementione d Bailey, as well as American track legend Carl Lewis). 5 Variable wind speeds As mentioned previously, the wind speeds are sampled for a pe riod of 10 sec- onds following the start of the race, after which the average value of the wind-speed is taken as the official gauge reading. The example s cited pre- viously have assumed that the wind velocity is constant. How ever, this is probably more of ideal situation than not. A more realistic s cenario is one 10in which the wind speed is variable, but averages out to a valu e which may be unrepresentative of the true conditions. Following the example of Dapena and Feltner [16], the result s of a variable-wind race are given in Table 3. Four separate varia bility condi- tions are simulated, with the constraint that the gauge read ing (i.e.the mean wind velocity over 10 seconds) be the legal limit of +2 .0 ms−1. These conditions include: 1. Step function: w(t) = 4 Θ( t−5) 2. Step function: w(t) = 4[1 −Θ(t−5)] 3. Linear: w(t) = 2/5t 4. Linear: w(t) = 2/5 (10−t) Here, Θ( t) is the Heavyside function, with Θ( t−t0) = 0 ∀t < t 0, and Θ(t−t0) = 1 otherwise. The time-averaged wind-speed is calculated in the usual fashion, ¯ w=T−1/integraltextT 0w(t)dt, with T= 10 seconds. While the constant tail-wind speed of +2 .0 ms−1predicts a boost of 0.104 s for the present model, the above conditions predict a rather large range of variation. Cases 1 and 3 show the smallest advantage s, due to minimal (or zero) wind conditions in the drive phase (hence l ower overall accelerations in the first half of the race). These cases also show the lowest peak velocities in this boost scenario, although still lowe r than the constant wind case. Note that the peak velocities occur much later tha n in the base caseandthe constant-wind case. Case 4 shows a peak velocity at roughly the same location as in the base 9.700 s run (a difference of only 19 cm), although with a much hi gher mag- nitude (+0 .182 ms−1). Case 2, on the other hand, shows almost the same velocity, but at a much earlier mark (54.95 m). This decidedl y premature maximum is no doubt due to the overpowering contributions of the velocity termfvonce the assisting tail-wind has subsided. The sprinter is p hysically unable to achieve a higher velocity. Dapena and Feltner only consider Cases 1 and 2 in their analys is (for the time-averaged +2 ms−1wind). However, it is interesting that the predictions of this model in fact are opposite of their assertions. For Ca se 1, they predict a boost of 0.066 s, while their Case 2 shows a boost of 0.060 s, b oth lower than their constant-wind case (0.070 s). The conditions of C ase 1 and Case 3 allow the maximum velocity to be achieved later in the race, w hich may not have an issue addressed by the authors in question. Their und erestimation 11of the initial boost may also be a contributing factor, and ad justment of their parameters to suit the current estimates of Dapena [17] may y ield differing results. Whether this is a false estimate in the figures of Dap ena and Feltner or a short-coming of the current model is an open question. Ob servation of this velocity-limitation could yield credibility to form o ffv. Certainly, such wind speed variations considered in this se ction can fur- ther contribute to small velocity discrepancies between th e model with con- stant wind speed, as well as variations in the actual race spl its. 5.1 Variable 0-wind average The analysis above begs the question: what kind of performan ce variations could be expected for a time-averaged wind speed of 0 ms−1? Table 5 demon- strates such potential discrepancies, with linear and sinu soidally-varying wind speed functions (the unrealistic step functions are om itted here). The linear winds simply range from equal-but-opposite maximum /minimum val- ues (with 0 ms−1occurring at the 5 s midpoint), the cosine functions begin and end at the indicated maximum and minimum, and the sine fun ctions achieve a the maximum indicated with 0 ms−1-endpoints. Absolute maxima of 2 and 4 ms−1are chosen. The simulations for the 2 ms−1absolute wind show variations between 0.034 s slower and +0.023 s faster than the actual 0 ms−1wind-speed val- ues of Table 1. Interestingly enough, the greatest advantag e comes from a cosine wind which begins and ends as a head-wind, the form of which allows for greater acceleration through middle of the race. Conversely, the greatest disadvantage is from the equivalent negative-cos ine wind. As the overall extremum of the wind increases, the differences beco me more acute (although note a much higher disadvantage when the wind is ne gative from about 30 m onward). Figure 7 presents the velocity profiles of several of these variable conditions, compared to the base case of Sect ion 3. 6 Comparison to previous wind-correction estimates Recently, a “back-of-the-envelope” expression for potent ial wind and alti- tude corrections was obtained in [20]: t0,0≈/bracketleftBig 1.027−0.027exp( −0.00125 H) (1−w·tw,H/100)2/bracketrightBig tw,(9) Here, tw,His the official race time (run with wind wat altitude H), and t0,0the time for w= 0 ms−1at sea level. This is derived in part from 12Equation 7 by selecting a constant propulsive force, and an a verage velocity v= 100 /tw,H. The assumption is made that a sprinter expends roughly δ= 2.7% of his/her energy fighting drag at sea level. For non-zero w,H,δ∼ ρ(H)Ad(vw,H−w)2. The effects of wind are thus calculated by assuming the adjusted drag impacts the sprinter’s velocity by the ratio o f forces F(vw,H− w)/F(v0), where v0,0≃100/t0,0is the average velocity at sea level with no wind for a race-time t0,0, with vw,H= 100 /tw,Hthe wind/altitude-influenced velocity/time. This ready-to-use expression provides a good match to the pr edictions of this model, as well as those of Dapena [17] and Linthorne [1 4]. Table 6 demonstrates the corrective potential of Equation (9) subj ect to the model parameters of Section 3. Note that the approximation become s slightly worse for increasing absolute wind speeds, however the magn itude of these variations is less than 0.5% for w∈[−5,+5] ms−1. Such errors can certainly be accounted for by mis-estimations of the input variables. The mismatch may also result from the constant velocity assu mption in the derivation. The interested reader is referred to [20] fo r the complete derivation. 7 What would have been the 100 m world record in 1988? On September 24th at the 1988 Seoul Olympics, Ben Johnson of C anada clocked an astounding 100 metre World Record time of 9.79 s, b ettering his previous record of 9.83 s. Although this mark (and most of Joh nson’s other records) were stricken from the books due to the infamous ste roid scandal which followed, the Seoul mark did not reflect the true potent ial of this remarkable athlete. At about 15 m from the finish line, Johnso n looked over his shoulder to gauge his lead over American Carl Lewis, and t hen raised his arm in victory as he coasted through the remained of the ra ce. The question lingers: what would have been his World Record time , had he not “stopped” at about 85 m? The model discussed herein can be used to obtain projections of his potential performances. Since no instantaneous velocity d ata is available for this race, the parameters in Equation 3 are selected to ma tch the 10 m splits. Table 7 shows these values (obtained from [6]), alon g with two sample simulations. The measured wind-speed of the race was w= +1.1 ms−1, and the modified drag area is kept as in Section 3. The elevation of Seoul is roughly that of sea level, so altitude corrections will be mi nimal in this case. 13Effectively, Johnson could have lowered his previous record by almost 0.1s, a quantum leap in the event. Depending on the chosen par ameters, the simulations predict times in the range of 9.60-9.62s, wh ich round to about 9.73-9.75s once reaction time is included. In this cas e, two sets are selected to match the recorded splits, with the parameter va lues the same as in Section 3, except variation in the values of ( f0,f1). The modified values are ( f0= 6.20;f1= 5.16) (Simulation 1), and ( f0= 6.18;f1= 5.17) (Simulation 2). Note that the maximum velocity of the simula tions do not exceed 12 ms−1. While Johnson may have slightly topped this value in the real race, he most certainly did not achieve 13.1 ms−1, a feat periodically attributed to him [21]. In 1999, American Maurice Greene reset the World Record to 9. 79 s during a race in Athens, Greece. Up to slight variations in al titude, the city is also at sea level, where the wind gauge read a calm +0 .1 ms−1. Adjusting this variable in the Johnson simulations, the time is scaled down to about 9.665 s (9.797 s after reaction) for Simulation 1, and 9.653 s for Simulation 2. (9.785 s after reaction). Thus, Johnson’s former World Reco rd would have effectively been equal to the 9.79 s set in 1999 by Greene. 8 General conclusions and future considerations The quasi-physical model considered herein provides a good match to mea- sured split data, particularly in the drive phase of the race . The wind and altitude corrections for both men and women are consistent w ith those pro- posed by previous authors, although this models yields stro nger deviations from the norm for variable wind conditions. If this type of sc enario occurs in a real competition, then the times may appear much faster ( or slower) than expect from the measured (time-averaged) wind. Upon comparison with the previous theoretical estimates an d comple- mentary field studies, it is clear that this model is both a rea listic represen- tation of short-sprint races, as well as a useful tool which c an assist in the physiological and biomechanical study of the sport. A forthcoming manuscript [5] will discuss the effects of wind and altitude assistance in the 200 metre dash. References [1] A. V. Hill, inReport of the 93rd Meeting, Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 156 (1925) 14[2] J. B. Keller, ”A theory of competitive running”, Physics Today 43, Sept. 1973; J. B. Keller, ”Optimal velocity in a race”, Amer. Math. Monthly 81, 474 (1974) [3] R. Tibshirani, ”Who is the fastest man in the world?”, Ame r. Stat. (May 1997) [4] J. R. Mureika, Can. J. Phys. 75, 837-851 (1997) [5] J. R. Mureika, “Simulating wind and altitude effects in th e 200 metre sprint” in preparation [6] “Scientific Research Project at the Games of the XXIVth Ol ympiad - Seoul 1988”, Bruggemann, G. and Glad, B. (eds), IAAF and Char les University, Prague (1988) [7] Davies, C. T. M. J. Appl. Physio. 48, 702-709 (1980) [8] W. G. Pritchard, ”Mathematical models of running”, SIAM Review 35, 359 (1993) [9] N. Linthorne, personal communication. (1994) [10] Official 1998/1999 Handbook, International Amateur Ath letics Feder- ation, Monaco (1998) [11] “IAAF Biomechanics Research Project - Athens 1997”, Ge rman Sport University Cologne, Germany; Institute for Athletics (199 7) [12] “The IAAF World Championship in Athletics, Sevilla ’99 : Results of the 100 m Men”, Laboratory of Biomechanics, Consejo Superio r de o Deportes (eds) (1999) [13] JENOPTIK Laser Systems, http: //www.jenoptik-los.de / [14] N. P. Linthorne, J. App. Biomech. 10, 110-131 (1994) [15] J. R. Mureika, “9.84 vs. 9.84: The Battle of Bruny and Bai ley”,Athlet- ics: Canada’s National Track and Field / Running Magazine (Decem- ber 1999) [16] Dapena, J. and Feltner, M. E. Int. J. Sport Biomech. 3, 6-39 (1987) [17] Dapena, J. personal communication; also “Corrections for Wind and Altitude”, The Big Green Book , Track and Field News Press (2000) 15[18] N. P. Linthorne, “Wind and altitude assistance in the 10 0-m sprint”, Proceedings, Eighth Biennial Conference, Canadian Societ y for Biome- chanics (1994) [19] N. P. Linthorne, “Wind speed variations at athletics tr acks”, submitted to3rd Engineering in Sport Conference [20] J. R. Mureika, “Back-of-the-envelope wind and altitud e correction in the 100 metre dash”, submitted to the Journal of Mathematical Physics [21] Feschuk, D. The National Post (18 Jun 1999) 16d (m) w= 0.0 ms−1w= +2.0 ms−1 10 1.708 8.800 1.705 8.840 20 2.747 10.323 2.738 10.396 30 3.676 11.142 3.659 11.240 40 4.554 11.584 4.529 11.710 50 5.409 11.792 5.373 11.941 60 6.254 11.844 6.208 12.012 70 7.100 11.787 7.041 11.970 80 7.953 11.650 7.880 11.849 90 8.818 11.455 8.730 11.666 100 9.700 11.217 9.596 11.439 Table 1: Model prediction for H= 0 m; ( f0,σ) = (6 .10,2.22); (f1,c,α) = (5.15,0.0385,0.3225); Ad= 0.002875. Maximum velocity 11.845 ms−1at 59.180 m (6.185 s) for w= 0.0 ms−1; 12.012 ms−1at 60.821 m (6.276 s) for w= +2.0 ms−1. 17d (m) H= 500 m 1000 m 1500 m 2000 m 2500 m 10 1.708 8.806 1.708 8.811 1.707 8.8148 1.707 8.820 1.707 8.8243 20 2.746 10.335 2.745 10.345 2.744 10.355 2.743 10.364 2.742 10.373 30 3.674 11.159 3.671 11.174 3.669 11.189 3.667 11.203 3.665 11.217 40 4.550 11.606 4.547 11.627 4.543 11.646 4.540 11.665 4.537 11.683 50 5.403 11.819 5.398 11.845 5.393 11.869 5.388 11.891 5.383 11.912 60 6.246 11.875 6.239 11.905 6.232 11.932 6.226 11.958 6.220 11.980 70 7.090 11.821 7.080 11.854 7.071 11.885 7.063 11.914 7.055 11.941 80 7.940 11.687 7.928 11.723 7.917 11.756 7.906 11.788 7.896 11.818 90 8.803 11.495 8.788 11.533 8.774 11.568 8.761 11.602 8.749 11.634 100 9.681 11.259 9.664 11.298 9.647 11.335 9.631 11.371 9.617 11.404 Table 2: Time-velocity (s, ms−1) split data for base 9.70 s sprint for varying altitudes Hwithw= 0 ms−1. Maximum velocities: 500m: 11.875 ms−1 (59.531 m; 6.207 s); 1000m: 11.905 ms−1(59.868 m; 6.228 s); 1500m: 11.932 ms−1(60.176 m; 6.247 s); 2000m: 11.959 ms−1(60.481 m; 6.266 s); 2500m: 11.983 ms−1(60.759 m; 6.283 s). d (m) Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 10 1.708 8.800 1.703 8.865 1.708 8.812 1.704 8.861 20 2.747 10.323 2.732 10.449 2.745 10.354 2.734 10.431 30 3.676 11.149 3.648 11.321 3.67 11.197 3.652 11.282 40 4.554 11.584 4.511 11.810 4.543 11.668 4.519 11.747 50 5.408 11.843 5.348 12.015 5.39 11.908 5.361 11.969 60 6.247 11.979 6.18 12.016 6.226 11.994 6.193 12.027 70 7.08 11.987 7.015 11.923 7.06 11.971 7.026 11.967 80 7.917 11.901 7.859 11.761 7.899 11.870 7.867 11.822 90 8.763 11.746 8.717 11.549 8.746 11.711 8.72 11.613 100 9.621 11.540 9.592 11.298 9.608 11.508 9.59 11.355 ∆ (s) +0.079 s +0.108 s +0.092 s +0.110 s Table 3: Time-averaged +2 ms−1wind-speed corrections. Case columns are (t,v) split-pairs. ∆ = 9 .700−t. 18d (m) Slow Start 10 1.765 8.896 20 2.788 10.486 30 3.705 11.269 40 4.575 11.677 50 5.423 11.861 60 6.264 11.896 70 7.107 11.826 80 7.957 11.681 90 8.821 11.480 100 9.701 11.238 Table 4: Example [ t(s),v(ms−1)] simulation for “slow start” sprinter (see Figure 6). Wind (ms−1)t (s) vmax(ms−1)dmax(m) ∆ (s) 2/5 (5−t)9.690 11.867 57.534 +0.010 2/5 (t−5) 9.716 11.823 61.134 −0.016 2cos(πt/5) 9.734 11.718 57.490 −0.034 −2cos(πt/5)9.677 11.953 60.293 +0.023 2sin(πt/5) 9.691 11.885 55.283 +0.009 −2sin(πt/5)9.720 11.821 64.336 −0.020 4/5 (5−t)9.687 11.889 56.153 +0.013 4/5 (t−5) 9.739 11.803 63.397 −0.039 4cos(πt/5) 9.778 11.575 54.359 −0.078 −4cos(πt/5)9.665 12.043 61.125 +0.035 4sin(πt/5) 9.693 11.932 52.749 +0.007 −4sin(πt/5)9.752 11.814 69.150 −0.052 Table 5: Time-averaged 0 ms−1wind-speed adjustments to base 9.700 s clocking. 19w (ms−1)H= 0 m 1000 m 2000 m -5 9.736 9.730 9.724 -4 9.729 9.724 9.717 -3 9.723 9.716 9.710 -2 9.715 9.709 9.703 -1 9.708 9.702 9.696 +0 — 9.695 9.689 +1 9.693 9.687 9.683 +2 9.686 9.681 9.676 +3 9.680 9.676 9.672 +4 9.674 9.671 9.667 +5 9.669 9.666 9.663 Table 6: Wind and altitude corrected times using “back-of-t he-envelope” correction in Equation (9). Base model is 9.700 seconds (0-w ind, 0-altitude). d (m) Official Split Simulation 1 Simulation 2 10 1.70 1.698 8.859 1.698 8.864 20 2.74 2.730 10.396 2.729 10.406 30 3.63 3.652 11.229 3.650 11.242 40 4.53 4.523 11.685 4.520 11.701 50 5.37 5.370 11.906 5.365 11.924 60 6.20 6.207 11.969 6.201 11.989 70 7.04 7.043 11.922 7.036 11.943 80 7.89 7.886 11.794 7.878 11.816 90 8.76 8.740 11.607 8.730 11.629 100 9.66 9.611 11.375 9.599 11.398 +R 9.79 s 9.743 s 9.731 s Table 7: Comparison of theoretical and actual race splits fo r Ben Johnson, 1988 Olympic Final. R= 0.132 s is the reaction time. 20-0.25-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.050 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500dt (s) Altitude (m)0 m/s +1 m/s +2 m/s +3 m/s +4 m/s +5 m/s Figure 1: World Class men’s performance adjustments for amb ient tail- winds at varying altitudes.21-0.1-0.0500.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500dt (s) Altitude (m)0 m/s -1 m/s -2 m/s -3 m/s -4 m/s -5 m/s Figure 2: World Class men’s performance adjustments for amb ient head- winds at varying altitudes.22-0.3-0.25-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.050 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500dt (s) Altitude (m)0 m/s +1 m/s +2 m/s +3 m/s +4 m/s +5 m/s Figure 3: World Class women’s performance adjustments for a mbient tail- winds at varying altitudes.23-0.100.10.20.30.40.5 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500dt (s) Altitude (m)0 m/s -1 m/s -2 m/s -3 m/s -4 m/s -5 m/s Figure 4: World Class women’s performance adjustments for a mbient head- winds at varying altitudes.24024681012 0 2 4 6 8 10 12f (m/s^2) v (m/s)Quasi-physical Keller Tibshirani Mureika Figure 5: Net positive propulsive force as a function of spri nter velocity. Shown for comparison are the hypothetical World Record mode ls of Keller (1973) and Mureika (1997) for Canadian athlete Donovan Bail ey.258.599.51010.51111.512 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11v (m/s) t (s)Fast start Slow start Figure 6: Velocity-time profile for fast- and slow-start spr inter simulations. 268.599.51010.51111.512 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11v (m/s) t (s)Normal I II III IV Figure 7: Velocity profile for 0-average variable wind condi tions. Cases include: I: w= 4/5 (5−t); II: w= 4/5 (t−5); III: 4 cos( πt/5); IV: 4 sin( πt/5).27

arXiv:physics/0007043v1 [physics.geo-ph] 13 Jul 2000The use of GPS-arrays in detecting shock-acoustic waves generated during rocket launchings Afraimovich E. L., Kosogorov E. A., Perevalova N. P., and Plotnikov A. V. Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SD RAS, p. o. box 4026, Irkutsk, 664033, Russia fax: +7 3952 462557; e-mail: afra@iszf.irk.ru Abstract This paper is concerned with the form and dynamics of shock-a coustic waves (SAW) generated during rocket launchings. We have dev eloped a method for determining SAW parameters (including angular c haracteris- tics of the wave vector, and the SAW phase velocity, as well as the direction towards the source) using GPS-arrays whose elements can be c hosen out of a large set of GPS-stations of the global GPS network. Cont rary to the conventional radio-probing tecniques, the proposed metho d provides an es- timate of SAW parameters without a priori information about the site and time of a rocket launching. The application of the method is i llustrated by a case study of ionospheric effects from launchings of laun ch vehicles (LV) Proton and Space Shuttle from space-launch complexes B aikonur and Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in 1998 and 1999 (a total of five lau nchings). The study revealed that, in spite of a difference of LV charact eristics, the ionospheric response for all launchings had the character o f anN–wave cor- responding to the form of a shock wave, regardless of the dist urbance source (rocket launchings, industrial explosions). The SAW perio dTis 270–360 s, and the amplitude exceeds the standard deviation of TEC back ground fluc- tuations in this range of periods under quiet and moderate ge omagnetic conditions by factors of 2 to 5 as a minimum. The angle of eleva tion of the SAW wave vector varies from 30◦to 60◦, and the SAW phase velocity (900–1200 m/s) approaches the sound velocity at heights of t he ionospheric F-region maximum. The position of the SAW source, inferred by neglect- ing refraction corrections, corresponds to the segment of t he LV Proton path at a distance no less than 700–900 km from the launch pad, and to the LV flying altitude no less than 100 km. For the Space Shuttl e LV the position of the SAW source corresponds to the segment of the t rajectory 1at a distance of at least 200–500 km from the launch pad and to t he LV flight altitude of at least 100 km. Our data are consistent wit h the exist- ing view that SAW are generated during a nearly horizontal fli ght of the rocket with its engine in operation in the acceleration segm ent of the path at 100–130 km altitudes in the lower atmosphere. 1 Introduction A large number of publications, including a variety of thoro ugh reviews (Karlov et al., 1980; Mendillo, 1981; 1982; Nagorsky, 1998; 1999) ar e devoted to the study of the ionospheric response of the shock wave produced during launchings of powerful rockets, among them launch vehicles (LV). Scien tific interest in this problem is due to the fact that such launchings can be regarde d as active experi- ments in the Earth’s atmosphere, and they can be used in solvi ng a wide variety of problems in the physics of the ionosphere and radio wave pr opagation. These investigations have also important practical implic ations since they fur- nish a means of substantiating reliable signal indications of technogenic effects (among them, unauthorized), which is necessary for the cons truction of an effec- tive global radiophysical subsystem for detection and loca lization of these effects. Essentially, existing global systems of such a purpose use d ifferent processing techniques for infrasound and seismic signals. However, in connection with the expansion of the geography and of the types of technogenic im pact on the en- vironment, very challenging problems heretofore have been those of improve the sensitivity of detection and the reliability of measured pa rameters of the sources of impacts, based also on using independent measurements of the entire spectrum of signals generated during such effects. To solve the above problems requires reliable information a bout fundamental parameters of the ionospheric response of the shock wave, su ch as the amplitude and the form, the period, the phase and group velocity of the w avetrain, as well as angular characteristics of the wave vector. Note that for the designating the ionospheric response of the shock wave, the literature uses terminology incorpo- rating a different physical interpretation, among them the t erm ‘shock-acoustic wave’ (SAW) — Nagorsky (1998). For convenience, in this pape r we shall use this term despite the fact that it does not reflect essentiall y the physical nature of the phenomenon. Published data on fundamental parameters of the SAW differ gr eatly. Accord- ing to a review by Karlov et al. (1980), the oscillation perio d of the ionospheric response of the SAW, recorded during launchings of the Apoll o mission rockets, varied from 6 to 90 min, and the propagation velocity was in th e range from 600 to 1670 m/s. The added complication is also that following the fi rst SAW response arriving at the detection point, a ‘second’ wave propagatin g with the sound veloc- ity at the ground level is often recorded (Karlov et al., 1980 ; Calais and Minster, 21996). A ‘third’ wave with large periods and subsonic propag ation velocities is occasionally also detected (Nagorsky, 1998; 1999). This wa ve is identified as an exciting Acoustic-Gravity Wave (AGW) during a rocket launc hing. There is an even greater uncertainty in the localization of t he region of SAW generation, which is necessary both for an understanding of the physical mech- anisms of the phenomenon, and for a scientific justification o f the solution of applied problems. Published data are discussed in more deta il in Section 5, by comparison with our obtained results. The lack of comprehensive, reliable data on SAW parameters i s due primarily to the limitations of existing experimental methods and det ection facilities. The main body of data was obtained by measuring the frequency Dop pler shift at vertical and oblique-incidence ionospheric soundings in t he HF range (Jacobson and Carlos, 1994; Nagorsky, 1998). In some instances the sen sitivity of this method is sufficient to detect the SAW reliably; however, diffic ulties emerge when localizing the region where the detected signal is generate d. These problems are caused by the multiple-hop character of HF signal propagati on. This gives no way of deriving reliable information about the phase and gro up velocities of SAW propagation, estimating angular characteristics of the wa ve vector, and, further still, of localizing the SAW source. Using the method of transionospheric sounding with VHF radi o signals from geostationary satellites, a number of experimental data on SAW parameters were obtained in measurements of the Faraday rotation of the plan e of signal polariza- tion which is proportional to a total electron content (TEC) along the line con- necting the satellite-borne transmitter with the receiver (Mendillo, 1981; 1982; Li et al., 1994). A serious limitation of methods based on ana lyzing signals from geostationary satellites is that their number is too small a nd ever decreasing with time, and the distribution in longitude is non-uniform; thi s is especially true in regard to the eastern hemisphere. Published data from incoh erent scatter (IS) radars are also scarce; as far as our knowledge goes, there is only one publica- tion (Noble, 1990) reporting the detection of long-period ( gravity) waves over the Arecibo IS station, following the launching of the Space Shu ttle LV on October 18, 1993. A common limitation of the above-mentioned methods when det ermining the SAW phase velocity is the necessity of knowing the time of a ro cket launching since this velocity is inferred from the SAW delay with respe ct to the launch time assuming that the velocity is constant along the propagatio n path, which is quite contrary to fact. For determining the above-mentioned reasonably complete s et of SAW param- eters, it is necessary to have appropriate spatial and tempo ral resolution which cannot be ensured by existing, very sparse, networks of iono zondes, oblique- incidence radio sounding paths, and IS radars. Furthermore , the creation of these facilities involves developing dedicated equipment , including powerful radio transmitters which contaminate the radio medium. As a resul t, the above sys- 3tems cannot serve as an efficient basis for a global radiophysi cal subsystem for detection and localization of technogenic effects which mus t provide a continuous, global monitoring. The advent and evolution of a Global Positioning System, GPS , and also the creation on its basis of widely branched networks of GPS stat ions (at least 600 sites at the end of 1999, the data from which are placed on the I NTERNET) opened up a new era in remote ionospheric sensing. In the imme diate future this network will undergo a substantial expansion by integratio n with the GLONASS positioning system (Klobuchar, 1997). In addition, resear chers have also access to a standard software which permits them to unify a preprocess ing of the data from multichannel two-frequency GPS receivers. In this context , a major effort must go into experimental and theoretical explorations of the po ssibilities of detecting technogenic perturbations of the ionosphere, as well as int o the development of appropriate algorithms and software for a reprocessing of t he data from GPS networks. Currently some authors have embarked on an intense developm ent of methods for detecting the ionospheric response of strong earthquak es (Calais and Minster, 1995), rocket launchings (Calais and Minster, 1996), and in dustrial surface ex- plosions (Fitzgerald, 1997; Calais et al., 1998a; Calais et al., 1998b). In the cited references the SAW phase velocity was determined by the ‘cro ssing’ method by estimating the time delay of SAW arrival at subionospheric p oints corresponding to different GPS satellites observed at a given time. However , the accuracy of such a method is rather low because the altitude at which the s ubionospheric points are specified, is determined in a crude way. The goal of this paper is to develop a method for determining S AW parameters (including the phase velocity, angular characteristics of the SAW wave vector, the direction towards the source, and the source location) usin g GPS-arrays whose elements can be chosen out of a large set of GPS stations of a gl obal IGS network. Contrary to existing radio techniques, this method estimat es SAW parameters without a priori information about the location and time of a rocket launching. The emphasis in this paper is on the ionospheric response of t he SAW which is recorded as a ‘first’ wave, although our developed methods ma ke it also possible to analyze other wave manifestations of rocket launchings. Th is will be the subject of future work. Section 2 presents a description of the geometry of experime nts and general information about the LV launchings from the Baikonur and Ke nnedy Space Cen- ter (KSC) cosmodromes which are analyzed in this study. A bri ef account of the proposed method is presented in Section 3. Measurements of S AW parameters at different GPS-arrays during rocket launchings are discus sed in Section 4. Sec- tion 5 discusses experimental results and compares them wit h the data reported by other authors. It is beyond the scope of this paper to consi der the physical mechanisms of SAW generation and propagation. 42 The geometry and general characterization of experiments This paper presents the results derived from determining th e key SAW param- eters during ascents of the Proton and Space Shuttle launch v ehicles (LV) from cosmodromes Baikonur (45.6◦N, 63.3◦E) and KSC (28.5◦N, 279.3◦E) in 1998 and 1999 (a total of five launchings). In spite of the large number of GPS stations, the selection of GPS-arrays for detecting SAW generated during rocket launchings is made di fficult by the fact that the LV flight paths for both cosmodromes pass either over the Atlantic ocean (Space Shuttle LV) or over sparsely populated regions of Kaz akhstan (Proton LV). Nevertheless, it was possible to utilize a sufficient num ber of GPS stations in order for this method to be implemented. Table 1 presents t he geographic coordinates of the GPS stations used as GPS-array elements. Fig. 1 portrays the geometry of experiments during Proton LV launchings from the Baikonur cosmodrome. The dash line roughly corresp onds to the hori- zontal projection of the rocket flight trajectory with orbit al inclination ψ= 51.6◦ (Nagorsky, 1999). The symbol ⋄marks the pad site. Bold dots mark the posi- tion of GPS stations, and upper-case lettering corresponds to their names. The scaling of the coordinate axes is selected from considerati ons of an approximate equality of the linear dimensions along the latitude and lon gitude. Below is a summary of results derived from detecting one stan dard launch- ing (on November 20, 1998) and two abortive launchings (July 5 and Oc- tober 27, 1999) of the Proton LV. The following information a bout rocket launchings from the Baikonur Cosmodrome as extracted from t he INTER- NET sites: http//www.flatoday.com; http://www.spacelaun chnews.com; and http://www.ksc.nasa.gov. Official data on abortive Proton L V launches on July 5 and October 27, 1999 were taken from the English version of th e press release is- sued by the Khrunichev Center which is available on: http:// www.isllaunch.com. A Proton launch vehicle failed during launch on July 5, 1999 ( Day 186). Initial analyses indicated a malfunction of the Proton’s se cond stage. Liftoff took place at 13:32 UT from a launch pad of the Baikonur Cosmodrome . First stage flight was normal, with second stage separation and ignition on time. Telemetry first reported anomalous data at approximately 280 seconds i nto the flight, with deviations from the planned trajectory appearing on ground tracking systems by 330 seconds. By 390 seconds the LV was 14 km below its planned t rajectory. Ground systems tracked the upper stages and payload to impac t. The Proton’s third stage, with the upper stage and its Raduga spacecraft p ayload, fell in the Karaganda region of Kazakhstan. The Proton LV was launched from a launch pad at Baikonur Cosmo drome on October 27 (Day 300), 1999 at 16:16 UT. Based on preliminary d ata, failure of one of the main second stage engines occurred 222 seconds aft er liftoff, followed 5by failure of all engines of the stage. The second stage toget her with the upper stage and satellite fell back to earth in the Karaganda regio n of Kazakhstan. In a typical Proton launch, the vehicle’s six first-stage eng ines ignite 1.6 s before liftoff. Stage two ignition occurs approximately two minutes into flight, four seconds prior to jettison of the first stage. Stage three vernier engine ignition occurs at 330 seconds, with separation of the second and thir d stages taking place 3.5 s later. The stage three main engine ignition occurs 2.5 s after separation. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain more detailed infor mation about the LV launch schedule on the above days. However, for a further a nalysis we need only know that these failures occurred after the second stag e was in operation longer than 200 s and 100 s for the July 5 and October 27, 1999 la unches, respec- tively. General information regarding these launches, as well as th e scheduled launch of November 20, 1998 (Day 324) is summarized in Table 2 (inclu ding the start timet0of UT, the start time of LT for one of the GPS-array sites, the o rbital inclination ψto the equatorial plane, and the level of geomagnetic distur bance according to Dst-variation data). It was found that the deviation of Dstfor the selected days was quite moderate thus enabling the SAW to be i dentified. Fig. 2 presents the experimental geometry during Space Shut tle LV launch- ings from the KSC Cosmodrome (the designations are the same a s in Fig. 1). The Space Shuttle Discovery spacecraft (STS-90) and Space S huttle Columbia (STS-95) were launched on April 17 (Day 107) and on October 29 (Day 302), respectively. General information about these launches is also summarized in Table 2. The horizontal projection of the rocket trajectory for the October 29 launching is constructed using the INTERNET data. The level of geomagnetic disturbance as deduced from the Dst-variation data was also found to be quite moderate for these launches, which made it possible to relia bly identify the SAW. 3 Methods of determining shock-acoustic wave characteristics using GPS-arrays The standard GPS technology provides a means for wave distur bances detecion based on phase measurements of TEC at each of spaced two-freq uency GPS receivers. A method of reconstructing TEC variations from m easurements of the ionosphere-induced additional increment of the group a nd phase delay of the satellite radio signal was detailed and validated in a serie s of publications (Calais and Minster, 1995, 1996; Fitzgerald, 1997). We reproduce he re only the final formula for phase measurements I=1 40.308f2 1f2 2 f2 1−f2 2[(L1λ1−L2λ2) +const +nL] (1) 6whereL1λ1andL2λ2are additional paths of the radio signal caused by the phase delay in the ionosphere, (m); L1andL2represent the number of phase rotations at the frequencies f1andf2;λ1andλ2stand for the corresponding wavelengths, (m); const is the unknown initial phase ambiguity, (m); and nLare errors in determining the phase path, (m). Phase measurements in the GPS can be made with a high degree of accuracy corresponding to the error of TEC determination of at least 1 014−2when aver- aged on a 30-second time interval, with some uncertainty of t he initial value of TEC, however (Hofmann-Wellenhof et al., 1992). This makes p ossible detecting ionization irregularities and wave processes in the ionosp here over a wide range of amplitudes (up to 10−4of the diurnal TEC variation) and periods (from 24 hours to 5 min). The unit of TEC, which is equal to 1016−2(TECU ) and is commonly accepted in the literature, will be used in the foll owing. Fig. 3a gives a schematic representation of the transionosp heric sounding ge- ometry. The axes z,y, andxare directed, respectively, zenithward, northward (N) and eastward ( E). P — point of intersection of Line-of-Sight (LOS) to the satellite with the maximum of the ionospheric F2-region; S — subionospheric point;αs—the azimuthal angle, counted off from the northward in a cloc kwise direction; and θs—the angle of elevation between the direction ralong LOS and the terrestrial surface at the reception site. In some instances a convenient way of detecting and determin ing the iono- spheric response delay of the shock wave involves inferring the frequency Doppler shiftFfrom TEC series obtained by formula (1). Such an approach is a lso use- ful in comparing TEC response characteristics from the GPS d ata with those obtained by analyzing VHF signals from geostationary satel lites, as well as in detecting the shock wave in the HF range. To an approximation sufficient for the purpose of our investigation, a corresponding relation ship was obtained by K. Davies (1969) F= 13.5×10−8I′ t/f (2) whereI′ tstands for the time derivative of TEC. Relevant results deri ved from analyzing the F(t)-variations calculated for the ‘reduced’ frequency of 136 MHz are discussed in Section 4. The correspondence of space-time phase characteristics, o btained through transionospheric soundings, with local characteristics o f disturbances in the iono- sphere was considered in detail in a wide variety of publicat ions (Bertel et al., 1976; Afraimovich et al., 1992; Mercier and Jacobson, 1997) and is not analyzed at length in this study. The most important conclusion of the cited references is the fact that, as for the extensively exploited model of a ‘ plane phase screen’ disturbances ∆ I(x,y,t) of TEC faithfully copy the horizontal part of the corre- sponding disturbance ∆ N(x,y,z,t ) of local concentration, independently of the 7angular position of the source, and can be used in experiment s on measuring the wave disturbances of TEC. However, the TEC response amplitude experiences a strong az imuthal de- pendence caused by the integral character of a transionosph eric sounding. As a first approximation, the transionospheric sounding method is responsive only to TIDs with the wave vector Ktperpendicular to the direction r. A corresponding condition for elevation θand azimuth αof an arbitrary wave vector Ktnormal to the direction r, has the form θ= arctan( −cos(αs−α)/tanθs) (3) We used formula (3) in determining the elevation θofKtfrom the known mean value of azimuth αby Afraimovich et al. (1998) – see Sections 3.2 and 4. 3.1 Detection and determination of the horizontal phase velocityVhand the direction αof the SAW phase front along the ground by GPS-arrays In the simplest form, space-time variations of the TEC ∆ I(t,x,y) in the iono- sphere, at each given time tcan be represented in terms of the phase interference pattern that moves without a change in its shape (the solitar y, plane travelling wave) ∆I(t,x,y) =δsin(Ωt−Kxx−Kyy+ϕ0) (4) whereδ,Kx,Ky, Ω — are the amplitude, the x- and y-projections of the wave vector K, and the angular frequency of the disturbance, respectivel y;T= 2π/Ω, Λ = 2π/|K|is its period and wavelength; and ϕ0is the initial phase of the dis- turbance. The vector Kis a horizontal projection of the full vector Kt(Fig. 3a). At this point, it is assumed that in the case of small spatial a nd temporal increments (the distances between GPS-array sites are less than the typical spatial scale of TEC variation, and the time interval between counts is less than the corresponding time scale), the influence of second derivati ves can be neglected. The following choices of GPS-arrays all meet these requirem ents. For the SAW which have mostly the character of an N-wave (Li et al., 1994; Calais and Minster, 1995, 1996; Fitzgerald, 1997; Calais et al., 1998), the am- plitudeδin (4) can be specified as (with an appropriate choice of the mo del parameters) δ(t) = exp[ −(t−tmax td)2] (5) wheretmaxis the time when the disturbance has a maximum amplitude, and td is the half-thickness of the ‘wave packet’. We employed this model in simulating 8the SAW detected during Proton LV launch on July 5, 1999 (at th e left of Fig. 4, and at the right of Fig. 5). We now summarize briefly the sequence of data processing proc edures. Out of a large number of GPS stations, three sites (A,B,C) are sel ected, the distances between which do not exceed about one-half the expected wave length Λ of the perturbation. Site B is taken to be the center of a topocentri c reference frame whose axis xis directed eastward, and the axis yis directed northward. The receivers in this frame of reference have the coordinates ( xA,yA), (0,0), (xC,yC). Parallel lines in Fig. 3b are lines of equal TEC; the arrow ind icates the direction αof a normal to these lines, that is, the direction of the wave v ectorK. Such a configuration of the GPS receivers represents the GPS-arra y with a minimum number of the required elements. In regions with a dense netw ork of GPS sites, we can obtain a large variety of GPS-arrays of a different confi guration enabling the acquired data to be checked for reliability; in this pape r we have exploited such a possibility. The input data include series of the ‘oblique’ value of TEC IA(t),IB(t),I(t), as well as corresponding series of values of the elevation θs(t) and the azimuth αs(t) of the beam to the satellite calculated using our developed C ONVTEC software program which converts the RINEX-files, standard for the GPS system, from the INTERNET (Gurtner, 1993). For determining SAW characteris tics, continuous series of measurements of IA(t),IB(t),IC(t) are selected with a length of at least a one-hour interval which includes the start time. To eliminate variations of the regular ionosphere, as well a s trends introduced by orbital motion of the satellite, a procedure is used to rem ove the linear trend involving a preliminary smoothing of the initial series wit h the selected time window. This procedure is best suited to the detection of the signal such as a single pulse ( N-wave) when compared to the frequently used band-pass filter (Li et al., 1994; Calais and Minster, 1995, 1996; Fitzgerald, 19 97; Calais et al., 1998). A limitation of the band-pass filter is the delay and the oscil latory character of the response which gives no way of reconstructing the form of theN-wave. Series of the values of the elevation θs(t) and azimuth αs(t) of the beam to the satellite are used to determine the location of the subio nospheric point S (see Fig. 3a), as well as to calculate the elevation θof the wave vector Ktof the disturbance from the known azimuth α(see formula (3) and Section 4.2). The most reliable results from the determination of SAW para meters cor- respond to high values of elevations θs(t) of the beam to the satellite because sphericity effects become reasonably small. In addition, th ere is no need to re- calculate the ‘oblique’ value of TEC ∆ I(t) to the ‘vertical’ value. In this paper, all results were obtained for elevations θs(t) larger than 30◦. Since the distance between GPS-array elements (from severa l tens of kilome- ters to a few thousand kilometers) is much smaller than that t o the GPS satellite (over 20000 km), the array geometry at the height hmaxis identical to that on the ground. 9Fig. 4a shows typical time dependencies of an ‘oblique’ TEC ∆ I(t) at the GPS- array CHUM station near the Baikonur Cosmodrome for the star t day, July 5, 1999 (heavy curve), one day before and after the start (thin l ines). For the same days; panel b shows TEC variations ∆ I(t) with the removed linear trend and a smoothing with the 5-min time window. Variations in frequen cy Doppler shift F(t); ‘reduced’ to the sounding signal frequency of 136 MHz, for three sites of the array (SELE, CHUM, SHAS) for the launch day, July 5, 1999, are presented in panel c. Day numbers, GPS station names and GPS PRN satellite numbers are indicated in all panels. The arrows at the abscissa axis indi cate the start time t0. It is evident from Fig. 4 that fast N-shaped oscillations with a typical period Tof about 300 s are clearly distinguished among slow TEC varia tions. The oscillation amplitude (up to 0.5 TECU ) is far in excess of the TEC fluctuation intensity during ‘background’ days. Variations in frequen cy Doppler shift F(t) for spatially separated sites (SELE, CHUM, SHAS) are well corre lated but are shifted relative to each other by an amount well below the period, whi ch permits the SAW propagation velocity to be unambiguously determined. A tim e resolution of 30 s used in our study, which is standard for the GPS data, is not qu ite sufficient for determining small shifts of such signals with an adequate ac curacy for different sites of the array (Fig. 4c). Therefore, we used a parabolic a pproximation of the F(t)-oscillations in the neighborhood of minimum F(t), which is quite acceptable when the signal/noise ratio is high. In addition, we used diff erent combinations for three sites of the possible number of GPS-array sites in t he area of Baikonur and KSC Cosmodromes. Relevant results for all combinations are presented in Table 3. With proper account of a good signal/noise ratio (larger tha n 1), we determine the horizontal projection of the phase velocity Vhwith the known coordinates of array sites A, B, C from time tpshifts of a maximum deviation of the frequency Doppler shift F(t). Preliminarily measured shifts are subjected to a linear t rans- formation with the purpose of calculating shifts for sites s paced relative to the central site northward Nand eastward E. This is followed by a calculation of theE- andN-components of VxandVy, as well as the direction αin the range of angles 0◦–360◦and the modulus Vhof the horizontal component of the SAW phase velocity α= arctan(Vy/Vx) Vh=|VxVy|(V2 x+V2 y)−1/2 (6) whereVy,Vxare the velocities with which the phase front crosses the axe sx andy. The orientation αof the wave vector K, which is coincident with the propagation azimuth of the SAW phase front, is calculated un ambiguously in the range 0◦–360◦subject to the condition that arctan( Vy/Vx) is calculated having regard to the sign of the numerator and denominator. The above method for determining the SAW phase velocity negl ects the cor- rection for orbital motion of the satellite because the esti mates ofVhobtained 10below exceed an order of magnitude as a minimum the velocity o f the subiono- spheric point at the height hmaxfor elevations θs>30◦(Afraimovich et al., 1998). From the delay ∆ t=tp−t0and the known path length between the launch pad and the subionospheric point we calculated also the SAW m ean velocity Va in order to compare our obtained estimates of the SAW phase ve locity with the usually used method of measuring this quantity. 3.2 Determination of the elevation of the wave vector θ and the velocity modulus Vtof the shock wave Afraimovich et al. (1992) showed that for an exponential ion ization distribution the TEC disturbance amplitude ( M) is determined by the aspect angle γbetween the vectors Ktandr(see Fig. 3a), as well as by the ratio of the wavelength of the disturbance Λ to the half-thickness of the ionization ma ximumhd M∝exp/parenleftBigg −π2h2 dcos2γ Λ2cos2θs/parenrightBigg (7) whereθsis the elevation of the wave vector r. In the case under consideration (see below), for the phase ve locity of order 1 km/s and for the period of about 200 s, the wavelength Λ is com parable with the half-thickness of the ionization maximum hd. When the elevations θsare 30◦, 45◦, 60◦, the ‘beam-width’ M(γ) at 0.5 level is, respectively, 25◦, 22◦and 15◦. If hdis twice as large as the wavelength, then the beam tapers to 14◦, 10◦and 8◦, respectively. The beam-width is sufficiently small that the aspect conditio n (3) restricts the number of beam trajectories to the satellite, for which i t is possible to detect reliably the SAW response in the presence of noise (near the a nglesγ= 90◦). On the other hand, formula ( ??) can be used to determine the elevation θof the wave vectorKtof the shock wave at the known value of the azimuth α(Afraimovich et al., 1998). Hence the phase velocity modulus Vtcan be defined as Vt=Vh×sec(θ) (8) The above values of the width M(γ) determine the error of calculation of the elevationsθ(of order 20◦to the above conditions (Section 3.3). 3.3 Determining the position and ‘switch-on’ time of the SAW source without regard for refraction corrections The ionospheric region that is responsible for the main cont ribution to TEC variations lies in the neighborhood of the maximum of the ion osphericF-region, which does determine the height hmaxof the subionospheric point. When selecting 11hmax, it should be taken into consideration that the decrease in e lectron density with height above the main maximum of the F2-layer proceeds much more slowly than is the case below the maximum. Since the density distrib ution with height is essentially a ‘weight function’ of the TEC response to a wa ve disturbance (Afraimovich et al., 1992), it is appropriate to use, as hmax, the value exceeding the true height of the layer hF2maximum by about 100 km. hF2varies over a reasonably wide range (250–350 km) depending on the time of day and on some geophysical factors which, when necessary, can be take n into account if corresponding additional experimental data and current io nospheric models are used. In all calculations that follow, hmax= 400 km is used. To a first approximation, it can be assumed that it is at this al titude where the imaginary detector is located, which records the ionosp heric SAW response in TEC variations. The ‘horizontal size’ of the detection re gion, which can be in- ferred from the propagation velocity of the subionospheric point as a consequence of the orbital motion of the GPS satellite (of order 50 m/s), a nd from the SAW period (of order 300 s — see Section 4), does not exceed 15–20 k m, which is far smaller than the ‘vertical size’. From the GPS data we can determine the coordinates XsandYsof the subionospheric point in the horizontal plane X0Yof a topocentric frame of ref- erence centered on the point B(0,0) at the time of a maximum TE C deviation caused by the arrival of the SAW at this point (see Fig. 3a). Si nce we know the angular coordinates θandαof the wave vector Kt, it is possible to determine the location of the point at which this vector intersects the hor izontal plane X′0Y′at the heighthwof the assumed source. Assuming a rectilinear propagation o f the SAW from the source to the subionospheric point and neglecti ng the sphericity the coordinate XwandYwof the source in a topocentric frame of reference can be defined as Xw=Xp−(hmax−hw)cosθsinα sinθ(9) Yw=Yp−(hmax−hw)cosθcosα sinθ(10) The coordinates XwandYw, thus obtained, can readily be recalculated to the values of the latitude and longitude ( φwandλw) of the source. For SAW generated during earthquakes, industrial explosio ns and under- ground tests of nuclear devices, hwis taken to be equal to 0 (the source lying at the ground level). When recording SAW produced by launchi ngs of powerful rockets, the region of SAW generation can lie at heights hwof order 100 km or higher (Li et al., 1994; Nagorsky, 1998). Using this approximation we neglect the possible refractio n at the SAW prop- agation from the source to the height hmax. In some publications (Calais et al., 1998) this problem is solved by performing trajectory calcu lations using stan- dard ‘ray tracing ’ procedures and neutral atmosphere models. In doing so, 12‘ray tracing ’ calculations were carried out from the source. In this stud y it is also possible to perform such calculations, not from the s ource but from the subionospheric point (return trajectory). It should be noted, however, that according to our data (Sect ion 4) and to the conclusions of some authors (Li et al., 1994; Nagorsky, 1998 ), the source lies at 100 km altitude at least. Thus the region of SAW generation is within the narrow height range (90–150 km) where the sound velocity gradient i s maximal (Li et al., 1994). Within the approximation of ‘short’ waves (geom etrical optics), this condition would mean the significance of refraction effects. However, the radial size of the region of SAW formation, like the extent of the dis turbance itself which it generated by the rocket jet, is about 30–50 km at the above- mentioned heights. This value is comparable with the typical scale of variation of the sound velocity with height, hence the wave is no longer a ‘short’ one, and the geometrical optics approximation is inapplicable. One would therefore expect that the refraction effect in the neighborhood of the SAW source will be smaller th an anticipated in terms of geometrical optics. Given the coordinates of the subionospheric point and of the disturbance source, the mean value of the SAW propagation velocity betwe en the source and the subionospheric point, and the arrival time of the SAW at t his point, then within the approximation of a rectilinear propagation it is easy to determine the ‘switch-on’ delay ∆ twof the anticipated SAW source with respect to the start. This would make it possible to obtain additional informatio n about the SAW source which is needed to understand the mechanism of SAW gen eration. The estimates of ∆ twmade below assume that the propagation velocity is taken equ al to 700 m/s (see Li et al., 1994). Note that by the ‘switch-on’ t ime of the source is meant here the time of a maximum disturbance of the backgro und state of the medium when the SAW is generated. 4 Results of measurements Hence, using the transformations described in Section 3, we obtain the following parameters determined from TEC variations and characteriz ing the SAW: t0— start time; tp— time of a maximum deviation of the frequency Doppler shift F(t); ∆t— delay of tpwith respect to t0;T— SAW period; AI— TEC distur- bance amplitude; AF— amplitude of a maximum frequency Doppler shift at the ‘reduced’ frequency of 136 MHz; αandθ— azimuth and elevation of the wave vectorKt;VhandVt— horizontal component and modulus of the phase veloc- ity;Va— mean wave velocity calculated from the delay ∆ tand from the known path-length between the launch pad and the subionospheric p oint;φwandλw— latitude and longitude of the source at 100km altitude; and ∆ tw— ‘switch-on’ delay of the assumed SAW source with respect to the start. 13Corresponding values of the SAW parameters, and also site na mes of the GPS-array and GPS satellite PRN numbers are presented in Tab le 3 for Baikonur Cosmodrome and Table 4 for the KSC Cosmodrome. It should be noted that the estimates of AIandAFare obtained by filter- ing ‘oblique’ TEC series; therefore, equivalent estimates for ‘vertical’ TEC are smaller by a factor varying from 1 to 2 depending on the elevat ionθsof the beam to the satellite. Solid curves in Figs. 1 and 2 show trajectories of subionosph eric points for each of the GPS satellites at the height hmax= 400 km. Dark diamonds along the trajectories correspond to the coordinates of subionosphe ric points at the time tpof a maximum deviation of the frequency Doppler shift F(Fig. 4c). Asterisks designate the source location at 100 km altitude inferred fr om the GPS-array data. Numbers at the asterisks refer to the corresponding da y numbers and to the ‘switch-on’ delay of the source with respect to the start time. Dashed straight lines connecting the anticipated source with the subionosp heric point show the horizontal projection of the wave vector Kt(see Fig. 3a). 4.1 SAW parameters during Proton LV launches from Baikonur Cosmodrome Let us consider the results derived from analyzing the ionos pheric effect of SAW during failed Proton LV launch on July 5, 1999 (line 2 in Table 2) obtained at the array (SELE, CHUM,SHAS) for PRN14 (at the left of Fig. 4, a nd line 1 in Table 3). In this case the delay of the SAW response with respect to the s tart time is 12 min. The SAW has the form of an N-wave with a period Tof about 300 s and an amplitude AI= 0.5TECU , which is an order of magnitude larger than TEC fluctuations for background days. It should be noted, howeve r, that this time interval was characterized by a very low level of geomagneti c activity (11 nT). The amplitude of a maximum frequency Doppler shift AFat the ‘reduced’ frequency of 136 MHz was found to be 0.12 Hz. In view of the fact that the shift Fis inversely proportional to the sounding frequency square d (Davies, 1969), this corresponds to a Doppler shift at the working frequency of 13.6 MHz and the equivalent oblique-incidence sounding path of about AF= 12 Hz. The azimuth and elevation αandθof the wave vector Ktwhose horizontal projection is shown in Fig. 1 by a dashed line and is marked by K1, are 153◦and 59◦, respectively. The horizontal component and the modulus of the phase veloc- ity were found to be Vh= 1808 m/s and Vt= 931 m/s. The source coordinates at 100 km altitude were determined as φw= 48◦andλw= 66◦. The ‘switch-on’ delay of the SAW source ∆ twwith respect to the start time was 264 s. The ‘mean’ velocity of about Va= 1000 m/s, determined in a usual 14manner from the response delay with respect to the start, was close the phase velocityVt. Similar results for the array (POL2, CHUM, SHAS) and PRN09 we re also obtained for failed launch of October 27, 1999. They corresp ond to the projection of the vector K2in Fig. 1, to the time dependencies in Fig. 4 (at the right), an d to line 7 in Table 3. One can only note that the SAW amplitude was b y a factor of 4–5 smaller than that for launch of July 5, 1999. At an increas ed level of magnetic activity (–80 nT) this led to a smaller (compared to July 5, 19 99) signal/noise ratio, which, however, did not interfere with obtaining rel iable estimates of SAW parameters. Fig. 5 (at the right) and line 12 of Table 3 present data for sta ndard launch of the Proton LV on November 20, 1998. A corresponding projecti on of the vector K3is shown in Fig. 1. A comparison of the data for standard launc h November 20, 1998 and failed launches showed that SAW parameters were rea sonably similar, irrespective of the level of geomagnetic disturbance, the s eason, and the local time. 4.2 SAW parameters during Space Shuttle launches from the KSC Cosmodrome Let us consider the results derived from analyzing the ionos pheric effect of the SAW during Space Shuttle LV launch on October 29, 1998 (line 3 of Table 2) obtained at the array (AOML, KYW1, EKY1) for PRN01 (at the lef t of Fig. 5, and line 1 in Table 4). As in the case of Proton LV launches, the delay of the SAW respo nse with respect to the start time is 12 min. The SAW has the form of an N-wave with a periodTof about 210 s and an amplitude AI= 0.3TECU (for AOML), which is an order of magnitude larger than TEC fluctuations for back ground fields. The amplitude of a maximum frequency Doppler shift AFat the ‘reduced’ frequency of 136 MHz was found to be 0.07 Hz (for AOML). It should be noted, h owever, that this time interval was characterized by a very low level of ge omagnetic activity (–15 nT). The azimuth and elevation αandθof the wave vector Ktwhose horizontal projection is shown in Fig. 2 by a dashed line and is marked by K1are 214◦ and 34.7◦, respectively. The horizontal component and the modulus of the phase velocity, and the mean velocity Vaare similar for those of the Proton LV (see Table 4). The source coordinates at 100 km altitude are deter mined asφw= 28.5◦ andλw= 284◦. The ‘switch-on’ delay of the SAW source ∆ twwith respect to the start time is 204 s. 154.3 Verifying the reliability of measurements of SAW pa- rameters To convince ourselves that the determination of the main par ameters of the SAW form and dynamics is reliable for the launches analyzed here , in the area of the Baikonur and KSC Cosmodromes we selected different combinat ions of three sites out of the sets of GPS stations available to us, and these data were processed with the same processing parameters. Relevant results for B aikonur (including the average results for the sets Σ), presented in Table 3 and i n Fig. 1 (SAW source position), show that the values of SAW parameters are simila r, which indicates a good stability of the data obtained, irrespective of the GPS -array configuration. The relative position of the Proton LV flight path and of the GP S-array sta- tions suitable for SAW detection was very convenient for our experiment because the subionospheric points of the GPS satellites were close t o the portion of the tra- jectory where the anticipated SAW source was located (Li et a l., 1994; Nagorsky, 1998), and away from the launch pad. In addition, the aspect c ondition (3) cor- responding to a maximum amplitude of the SAW response to the S AW passage was satisfied quite well for this geometry for all array stati ons simultaneously. This is confirmed by a high degree of correlation of SAW respon ses at the array elements (Fig. 4c), which made it possible to obtain differen t sets of triangles from the six GPS stations available to us. Unlike he Baikonur Cosmodrome, the relative position of the Space Shuttle LV flight path and of the GPS-array stations was inconvenient for SAW detection because the subionospheric points of the GPS satellites wer e near the launch pad. As a consequence the aspect condition (3) was not satisfied si multaneously for all GPS stations located near the Cosmodrome. This is especiall y true for stations CCV1, CCV3 and EKY1 located in the neighborhood of the launch pad along a direction similar to that of the LV flight path. This resulted in a low degree of correlation and a very different amplitude of SAW responses a t the array elements (Fig. 5f). Some of the stations listed in Table 1 are too close to each other (CCV1, CCV3; MIA1, MIA3; KYW1, KYW2) and cannot be used in mutual ver ification of the reliability of measurements. As a result, we were able to obtain, for the October 29, 1998 launch, only two sets of triangles out of the nine GPS stations available to us (see Table 4). Because of the low correlation of the responses and the incon venient GPS- array geometry for the April 17, 1998 launch, we were also una ble to obtain reliable estimates of the SAW wave vector parameters. There fore, we did not plot the relevant data in Fig. 2 and limited ourselves to ment ioning them in Table 4 (lines 4 and 5). We availed ourselves also of another method to check the data from the GPS- array for reliability, namely, a modeling using the algorit hm for calculating TEC along the ‘receiver-satellite’ beam for a typical model of t he regular ionosphere, a disturbed SAW with specified properties described by Afraim ovich et al. (1998). 16A peculiarity of this algorithm is that it is possible to calc ulate TEC for a par- ticular selected array and for a real trajectory of the satel lite determined by the initial navigational RINEX-file. As an example, Fig. 5 (left) shows the computed data for the ar ray (SELE, CHUM, SHAS) and for the SAW model in the form of wave packet (5) with a pe- riod of 240 s, the packet’s duration of 240 s, a maximum amplit ude of 0.5TECU , the horizontal phase velocity Vh= 1200 m/s, and the azimuth αand the elevation θof the wave vector Ktequal to 153◦and 60◦, respectively. A comparison of the parameters specified in the modeling procedure with those ob tained by processing the data of TEC I(t) model series shows that these values agree with an accuracy no worse than 10%. Noteworthy also is a good agreement of expe rimental (at the left of Fig. 4) and model (at the left of Fig. 5) TEC variations ∆I(t) andF(t) for the array (SELE, CHUM, SHAS). 5 Discussion Here we discuss the main results and compare them with finding s reported by other authors. Within the context of this study we deliberat ely pass over a physical interpretation of our obtained results because of no information available about the dynamics and energetics of Proton and Space Shuttl e LV launches. Our intention is to obtain more trustworthy and reliable dat a ensuring the new possibilities of a global GPS monitoring. 5.1 The form of response It was found that in spite of the difference of LV characterist ics, the local time, the season, and the level of geomagnetic disturbance, the io nospheric response for all launches has the character of an N-wave. The SAW period Tis 270–360 s, and the amplitude exceeds the standard deviation of background TEC fluctuations in this range of periods under quiet and moderate geomagneti c conditions, by a factor of 2–5 as a minimum. Our measurements of the period and amplitude of the SAW respo nse are in good agreement with frequency Doppler shifts measured in th e HF range during Space Shuttle LV launches on February 28, 1990 and April 28, 1 991 (Jacobson and Carlos, 1994), as well as wit corresponding estimates of a maximum shift F reported by Nagorsky (1998, 1999) for oblique HF radio path d uring LV launches from Baikonur Cosmodrome. They are also similar to the estim ates obtained by Li et al. (1994) using the transionospheric VHF radio signal from geostationary satellite MARECS-B2 during Space Shuttle LV launches on Oct ober 18, 1993 (STS-58) and February 3, 1994 (STS-60). According to measurements reported by Calais and Minster (1 996), during Space Shuttle (STS-58) launch on October 18, 1993 two series of TEC fluctuations 17were recorded, one of which had also the form of an N-wave with a maximum amplitude of 0.25 TECU, which is also consistent with our dat a. It was pointed out in the literature that SAW of a similar form and with a sim- ilar amplitude were detected during powerful industrial ex plosions (Afraimovich et al., 1984; Jacobson et al., 1988; Blanc and Jacobson, 1989 ; Fitzgerald, 1997; Calais et al., 1998a; 1998b; Nagorsky, 1998). 5.2 Angular characteristics of the wave vector, and the phase velocity of SAW As pointed out in the Introduction, some researchers report markedly different values of the SAW propagation velocity — up to several thousa nd m/s, which exceeds the sound velocity at SAW propagation heights in the atmosphere. Ac- cording to the data from a review by Karlov et al. (1980), the p ropagation velocity of the SAW ionospheric response recorded during la unches of the Apollo mission rockets, varied from 600 to 1670 m/s. Arendt (1971) suggested that the shock wave produced by rock et flight is divided in the ionosphere at about 160 km altitude into the io n-acoustic mode (with a velocity as high as 1.3 km/s) and a normal acoustic mod e (with the velocity of up to 500 m/s). Arendt (1971) explains the differe nce in propagation velocities of the first and second disturbances observed dur ing Apollo-14 and Apollo-15 launches at the same distance of 1440 km from the st art site, by a difference in atmospheric conditions and propagation paths of the waves because of seasonal variations of the ionosphere. Noble (1990) describes the observations of long-period wav es over the Arecibo incoherent scatter station during Space Shuttle STS-4 laun ch on June 27, 1982. At a large distance from the path (up to 1000 km) the group velo city of wave propagation was found to be 600–700 m/s. According to GPS measurements (Calais and Minster, 1996), t he SAW phase velocity at ionospheric heights is about 1000–1300 m/s. A common limitation of existing methods for determining the SAW phase velocity is the need to know the launch time of the rocket sinc e this velocity is calculated from the SAW delay with respect to the start tim e assuming that the velocity along the propagation path is constant, which i s by far contrary to fact. Furthermore, only the horizontal component of the pha se velocityVhwas in essence determined in such studies. At different values of el evation of the wave vectorKt, the velocity Vhcorresponds to markedly differing values of the modules of the phase velocity Vt. The use of the method proposed in this paper makes possible de termining angular characteristics of the wave vector Ktand, accordingly, estimating Vt. According to our data (Tables 3 and 4), the elevation of the SA W wave vector varied from 30–60◦, and the SAW phase velocity was in the range of from 900 18to 1200 m/s. We determine the phase velocity of the line of equ al TEC at the height of the ionospheric F-region maximum which makes the main contribution to variations in TEC between the receiver and the GPS satelli te and corresponds to the region of maximum sensitivity of the method. Since Vtapproaches the sound velocity at these altitudes (Li et al., 1994), this mak es it possible to identify the sound nature of a TEC perturbation. 5.3 The location and ‘switch-on’ delay of the SAW source The position of the SAW source, calculated by neglecting ref raction corrections, corresponds to the segment of the LV trajectory (Figs. 1 and 2 ) within distances of at least 700–900 km from the launch pad for the Proton LV and of at least 200–500 km for the Space Shuttle LV. This is consistent with t he ‘switch-on’ delay ∆twof the source which is 250–300 s for the Proton LV and 200 s for t he Space Shuttle LV. As is evident from our data, the calculated position of the SAW source for rocket launches does not coincide with the pos ition of the launch pad. At the same time the source location is in reasonably goo d agreement with that of horizontal projections of LV trajectories (Figs. 1 a nd 2). Kaschak et al. (1970) analyzed the data from the infra sound m easuring arrays located on the USA north-eastern coast which observe d strong acoustic signals from launch and reentry areas of the Saturn-5 LV. The authors identified three types of signals: one includes early signals whose arr ival time corresponded to supersonic values of their velocity equal to 500–1000 m/s ; the other type represents normal signals with the group velocity approxim ately equal to the normal velocity of sound propagation in the air; and the last type involves late signals with subsonic velocities in the range of from 190 to 2 40 m/s. Kaschak et al. (1970) and Balachandran et al. (1971) suggested that t he so-called ‘early’ signals during rocket launches are caused by SAW which are ge nerated during the reentry of the first stage at distances from the launch pad exceeding 500 km. However, our data are in better agreement with the mechanism substantiated by Li et al. (1994), Calais and Minster (1996), and Nagorsky ( 1998, 1999). They believe that the generation of SAW occurs during a nearly hor izontal travel of the rocket with the operating engine along the acceleration seg ment of the trajectory, at the lower atmospheric heights of 100–130 km. The rocket tr avels this segment with supersonic velocity at 100–300 s of its flight at a distan ce of at least 500 km from the launch pad (see the data on the Proton LV flight schedu le in Section 2). As soon as it ascends to an altitude of about 100 km, the SAW sou rce is ‘switched on’. 196 Conclusions In this paper we have investigated the form and dynamics of sh ock-acoustic waves (SAW) generated during rocket launches. We have developed a method for deter- mining SAW parameters (including angular characteristics of the wave vector and the SAW phase velocity, as well as the direction to the source ) using the GPS- arrays whose elements can be chosen out of a large set of GPS st ations forming part of a global IGS network. Unlike existing radio techniqu es, the proposed method estimates SAW parameters without a priory informati on about the site and time of rocket launch. The implementation of the method i s illustrated by analyzing ionospheric effects from launches of the Proton an d Space Shuttle LV from Baikonur and KSC Cosmodromes in 1998 and 1999 (totaling five launches). The results reported in this study suggest the following con clusions: 1. In spite of the difference of LV characteristics, for all la unches the iono- spheric response has the character of an N-wave corresponding to the form of a shock wave, irrespective of the type of disturbance sour ce (rocket launch, industrial explosion). 2. The SAW period Tis 270–360 s, and its amplitude (from 0.1 to 0.5 TECU ) exceeds the standard deviation of TECU background fluctuations in this range of periods under quiet and moderate geomagnetic condi tions by a factor of 2–5 as a minimum. 3. The elevation of the SAW wave vector varies within 35–60◦, and the SAW phase velocity (900–1200 m/s) approaches the sound velocit y at heights of the ionospheric F-region minimum. This makes it possible to identify the sound nature of a TEC perturbation. 4. The position of the SAW source, calculated by neglecting r efraction correc- tions, corresponds to a segment of the Proton LV trajectory a t a distance of at least 700–900 km from the launch pad and to the LV flight al titude of at least 100 km. For the Space Shuttle LV the position of the SAW source corresponds to the segment of the trajectory at a dist ance of at least 200–500 km from the launch pad and to the LV flight altitude of a t least 100 km. Hopefully, our investigation would provide additional use ful insights into the physical processes occurring during flights of rockets in th e Earth’s atmosphere on the acceleration segment of the trajectory. In addition, this would make it possible to identify more reliable signal indications of te chnogenic effects which are necessary for constructing an effective global radio sub system for detection and localization of these effects by processing the data from an international network of two-frequency receivers of the GPS-GLONASS navi gation systems. 207 Acknowledgements We are grateful to E. A. Ponomarev, V. V. Yevstafiev, A. M. Ural ov, P. M. Nagorsky, N. N. Klimov, and A. D. Kalikhman for their int erest in this study, helpful advice and active participation in discussi ons. Authors are grateful to K. S. Palamartchouk and O. S. Lesuta for preparing the inpu t data. Thanks are also due to V. G. Mikhalkosky for his assistance in prepar ing the English version of the manuscript. This work was done with support fr om the Russian foundation for Basic Research (grants 97-02-96060 and 99-0 5-64753), as well as under grant 1999 of the RF Ministry of Education (Minvuz), un der direction of B. O. Vugmeister. References [1] Afraimovich, E.L., Varshavsky, I.I., Vugmeister, B.O. , et al., 1984. Influence of surface industrial explosions on Doppler and angular cha racteristics of the ionosphere-reflected radio signal. Geomagnetizm i aeronom iya, 24, 322–324 (in Russian). [2] Afraimovich, E.L., Terechov, A.I., Udodov, M.Yu., and F ridman, S.V., 1992. Refraction distortions of transionospheric radio signals caused by changes in a regular ionosphere and by travelling ionospheric disturb ances. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 54, 1013–1020 . [3] Afraimovich, E.L., Palamartchouk, K.S., and Perevalov a, N.P., 1998. GPS radio interferometry of travelling ionospheric disturban ces. Journal of Atmo- spheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 60, 1205–1223. [4] Arendt, P.R., 1971. Ionospheric undulations following ‘Appolo–14’ launch- ing. Nature, 231, 438–439. [5] Balachandran, N.K., Donn, W.L., and Kaschak, G., 1971. O n the propaga- tion of infrasound from rockets: effects of winds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 50 (2), part 1, 397–404. [6] Bertel, L., Bertin, F., and Testud, J., 1976. De la mesure du contenu elec- tronique integre appliquee a l’observation des ondes de gra vite de moyenne echelle. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Phy sics, 38, 261–270. [7] Blanc, E., and Jacobson, A.R., 1989. Observation of iono spheric disturbances following a 5-kt chemical explosion. 2. Prolonged anomalie s and stratifica- tions in the lower thermosphere after shock passage. Radio S cience, 24, 739– 746. 21[8] Calais, E. and Minster, J.B., 1995. GPS detection of iono spheric perturba- tions following the January 1994, Northridge earthquake. G eophysical Re- search Letters, 22, 1045–1048. [9] Calais, E., and Minster, J.B., 1996. GPS detection of ion ospheric pertur- bations following a Space Shuttle ascent. Geophysical Rese arch Letters, 23, 1897–1900. [10] Calais, E., Minster, J.B., Hofton, M.A., and Hedlin, M. A.H., 1998a. Iono- spheric signature of surface mine blasts from Global Positi oning System mea- surements. Geophysical Journal International, 132, 191–2 02. [11] Calais, E., Minster, J.B., and Bernard, J., 1998b. GPS, Earthquake, the ionosphere and Space Shuttle. Physics of Earth and Planet, 1 05, 167–181. [12] Davies, K., 1969. Ionospheric radio waves. Blaisdell P ublishing Company. A Division of Ginn and Company. Waltham, Massachusetts-Toro nto-London. [13] Fitzgerald, T.J., 1997. Observations of total electro n content perturbations on GPS signals caused by a ground level explosion. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 59, 829–834. [14] Gurtner, W., 1993. RINEX: The Receiver Independent Exc hange Format Version 2. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/data/forma t/rinex2.txt [15] Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., and Collins , J., 1992. Global Po- sitioning System: Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag Wi en, New York. [16] Jacobson, A.R., Carlos, R.C., and Blanc, E., 1988. Obse rvation of iono- spheric disturbances following a 5-kt chemical explosion. 1. Persistent os- cillation in the lower thermosphere after shock passage. Ra dio Science, 23, 820–830. [17] Jacobson, A.R., and Carlos, R.C., 1994. Observations o f acoustic–gravity waves in the thermosphere following Space Shuttle ascents. Journal of At- mospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 56, 525–528. [18] Karlov, V.D., Kozlov, S.I., and Tkachev, G.N., 1980. La rge-scale distur- bances in the ionosphere produced by rocket flight with the op erating engine. Kosmicheskiye issledovaniya, 18, 266–277 (in Russian). [19] Kaschak, G, Donn, W.L., and Fehr, U., 1970. Long-range i nfrasound from rockets. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 48 (1 ), part 1, 12–20. [20] Klobuchar, J.A., 1997. Real-time ionospheric science : The new reality. Radio Science, 32, 1943–1952. 22[21] Li, Y.Q., Jacobson, A.R., Carlos, R.C., Massey, R.S., T aranenko, Y.N., and Wu, G., 1994. The blast wave of the Shuttle plume at ionospher ic heights. Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 2737–2740. [22] Mendillo, M., 1981. The effects of rocket launches of the ionosphere. Ad- vances in Space Research, 1, 275–290. [23] Mendillo, M., 1982. Modification of the ionosphere by la rge space vehicles. Advances of Space Research, 2, 150–159. [24] Mercier, C. and Jacobson, A.R., 1997. Observations of a tmospheric grav- ity waves by radio interferometry: are results biased by the observational technique? Annales G´ eophysicae, 15, 430–442. [25] Nagorsky, P.M., 1998. The inhomogeneous structure of t he ionospheric F- region produced by rockets. Geomagnetizm i aeronomiya, 38, 100–106 (in Russian). [26] Nagorsky, P.M., 1999. Analysis of the HF radio signal re sponse to ionospehric plasma disturbances caused by shock-acoustic waves. Izves tya VUZov Ra- diofizika, 42, 36–44 (in Russian). [27] Noble, S.T., 1990. A large-amplitude traveling ionosp heric disturbance exited by the Space Shuttle during launch. Journal of Geophysical R esearch, 95, 19,037–19,044. 2357 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 81 Longitude (E)404244464850Latitude (N) KUMTSUMK SELE CHUM SHASCosmodrome BaikonurRussian Proton POL2 DAY 186 chum; prn 14 DAY 324 chum; prn 16DAY 186DAY 324Launch: Nov. 20 1998 06:40 UT (DAY 324) Launch: Jul. 5 1999 13:32 UT (DAY 186) Launch: Oct. 27 1999 16:16 UT (DAY 300) K1K2 DAY 300 chum; prn 09DAY 300 K3Karaganda Alma-Ata248 s.308 s. 312 s.Fig/. /1 /: Exp erimen tal geometry during launc hes of the Proton launc h v ehiclefrom Baik on ur Cosmo drome/. The dash line roughly corresp onds to the horizon/-tal pro jection of the ro c k et / igh t tra jectory with orbital inclination /5/1/./6 //. Thesym b ol / marks the p osition of the launc h pad/. Solid lines sho w tra jectoriesof subionospheric p oin ts for eac h GPS satellite at the heigh t hmax /= /4/0/0 km/.Dark b o xies along the tra jectories sho w the p osition of subionospheric p oin ts atthe time tp of a maxim um deviation of the frequency Doppler shift F /. Asteriskssho w the source p osition at /1/0/0 km altitude determined using the data from theGPS/-arra ys/. Num b ers at the asterisks corresp ond to da y n um b ers and to the/`switc h/-on/' dela y of the source with resp ect to the start time/. Dashed straigh tlines connecting the an ticipated source with the subionospheric p oin t designatethe horizon tal pro jection of the w a v e v ector K /. Hea vy dots and upp er/-case lettersmark the p osition and names of the GPS stations/, while lo w er/-case letters alongthe tra jectories refer to station names and PRN n um b ers of the GPS satellites/.276 279 282 285 288 Longitude (E)2426283032Latitude (N) CCV3 AOML RCM6Space Shuttle Discovery (STS-95) EKY1 DAY 302 aoml; prn 1K1 Kennedy Space Center KYW1 Launch: Oct. 29 1998 19:19 UT (DAY 302)Fig/. /2 /: Exp erimen tal geometry during launc hes of the Space Sh uttle launc hv ehicle from the Kennedy Space Cen ter Cosmo drome /(the designations are thesame as in Fig/. /1Fig/. /3 /: a/) Sc hematic represen tation of the transionospheric sounding ge/-ometry /. The axes z /, y /, and x are directed/, resp ectiv ely /, zenith w ard/, north w ard/(N/) and east w ard /(E/)/. P /| p oin t of in tersection of Line/-of/-Sigh t /(LOS/) to thesatellite with the maxim um of the ionospheric F /2/-region/; S /| subionosphericp oin t/; /s /|the azim uthal angle/, coun ted o/ from the north w ard in a clo c kwisedirection/; and /s /|the angle of elev ation b et w een the direction r along LOS andthe terrestrial surface at the reception site/. / /| the angle b et w een the v ectors Ktand r /. b/) GPS/-arra y geometry /. A/,B/,C /| receiv er p oin b y ab out sev eral tensof kilometers/, at whic h t w o/-frequency m ultic hannel GPS/-receiv ers are installed/.P arallel lines corresp ond to lines of equal TEC/. The arro w indicates the v ectorK in the direction / /; N/, E /| north w ard and east w ard directions/.13.013.514.002040 13.613.713.813.9-0.60.00.616.016.517.00.02.55.0 16.416.516.616.7-0.120.000.12I(t), 1016 m-2I(t), 1016 m-2 a. d. b. e. 129 1411429 141 29 YAKAFAIR 13.613.713.813.9 UT, hour-0.150.000.15 16.416.516.616.7 UT, hour-0.030.000.03 MAC1c. f. PRN22PRN29F(t), Hz F(t), HzI(t), 1016 m-2I(t), 1016 m-2 DAY 185 DAY 299 DAY 187 DAY 301Δ Δ CHUM CHUM SELE POL2 SHAS SHASLV " Proton " 05.07.99 (13:32 UT) 27.10.99 (16:16 UT) DAY 185 DAY 299 DAY 187 DAY 301 DAY 186 DAY 300 PRN 14 PRN 09CHUM; PRN 14 CHUM; PRN 09 DAY 186 DAY300Fig/. /4 /: Time dep endencies of /`oblique/' TEC /
I /( t /) at one of the three sitesof the GPS/-arra y in the area of Baik on ur Cosmo drome on the da ys of Proton L Vlaunc h /(hea vy curv e/)/, and one da y b efore and one da y after the start /(thin curv es/)on July /5/, /1/9/9/8 /| panel a/, and on Octob er /2/7/, /1/9/9/9 /| panel d/; panels b/, e /|for the same da ys but the TEC v ariations /
I /( t /) with the linear trend remo v edand with a smo othing with a time windo w of /5 min/; panels c/, f /| v ariations ofthe frequency Doppler shift F /( t /) /`reduced/' to the sounding signal frequency of/1/3/6 MHz/, for three sites of the arra ys/, start da ys/. All panels sho w da y n um b ers/,GPS station names/, and PRN n um b ers of the GPS satellites/. The small arro wsat the abscissa axis indicate the start time t/0 /.13.513.814.002550 13.613.713.813.9-0.60.00.66.66.87.07.27.405101520 6.76.86.97.0-0.150.000.15I(t), 1016 m-2I(t), 1016 m-2 a. d. b. e. 129 14129 141 29 YAKAFAIR 13.613.713.813.9 UT, hour-0.20.00.2 6.76.86.97.0 UT, hour-0.050.000.05c. f. PRN22PRN29F(t), Hz F(t), Hz DAY 186 CHUM; PRN 14 I(t), 1016 m-2I(t), 1016 m-2 DAY 323 DAY 325Δ Δ TEST CHUM SELE POL2LV " Proton " 05.07.99 (13:32 UT) 20.11.98 (06:40 UT) DAY 325CHUM; PRN 16 TEST DAY 324 PRN 16DAY 323 DAY 324Fig/. /5 /: Same as in Fig/. /4/, but in the area of Baik on ur Cosmo drome/, for ProtonL V launc h on No v em b er /2/0/, /1/9/9/8 /(righ t/)/. Left /| SA W p erturbation mo del forProton L V launc h on July /5/, /1/9/9/9 in the form of a w a v e pac k et with a p erio d of/2/4/0 s/, the pac k et/'s duration of /2/4/0 s/, a maxim um amplitude of /0/./5 T E C U /, thehorizon tal phase v elo cit y Vh /= /1/2/0/0 m//s/, the azim uth / /, and the elev ation / ofthe w a v e v ector Kt of /1/5/3 /and /6/0 //, resp ectiv ely /(see Fig/. /4 at the left/)/.18.020.022.00102030 19.419.519.619.7-0.30.00.318.018.418.801020 18.418.518.6-1.00.01.0I(t), 1016 m-2I(t), 1016 m-2 I(t), 1016 m-2a. d. b. e. 129 141142229 141 29FAIR 19.419.519.619.7 UT, hour-0.10.00.1 18.418.518.6 UT, hour-0.250.000.25 MAC1c. f. PRN25PRN29F(t), Hz F(t), HzI(t), 1016 m-2I(t), 1016 m-2Δ Δ DAY 302 DAY 107DAY 301 DAY 106 DAY 303 DAY 108AOML; PRN 01 AOML; PRN 15 EKY1 CCV1 AOML AOML KYW1 KYW2DAY 106 DAY 108 DAY301 DAY 303" Space Shuttle " 29.10.98 (19:19 UT) 17.04.98 (18:19 UT) PRN 1 PRN 15DAY 302 DAY 107Fig/. /6 /: Same as in Fig/. /4/, but in the area of Kennedy Space Cen ter Cosmo d/-rome/, for launc hes of April /1/7 and Octob er /2/9/, /1/9/9/8/.T able /1 /: GPS site names and lo catio nsN SITE Geograph/.latitude Geograph/.longitudeKazakstan/1 SUMK /4/4/./2/0/8 /7/3/./9/9/7/2 SELE /4/3/./1/7/8 /7/7/./0/1/6/3 CHUM /4/2/./9/9/8 /7/4/./7/5/1/4 POL/2 /4/2/./6/7/9 /7/4/./6/9/4/5 SHAS /4/2/./6/2/0 /7/5/./3/1/5/6 KUMT /4/1/./8/6/4 /7/8/./1/9/0Cap e Cana v eral/1 CCV/3 /2/8/./4/6/0 /2/7/9/./4/5/7/2 CCV/1 /2/8/./4/6/0 /2/7/9/./4/5/7/3 EKY/1 /2/7/./6/0/0 /2/7/7/./2/4/0/4 A OML /2/5/./7/3/5 /2/7/9/./8/3/8/5 MIA/3 /2/5/./7/3/2 /2/7/9/./8/4/0/6 MIA/1 /2/5/./7/3/3 /2/7/9/./8/4/0/7 KYW/1 /2/4/./5/8/2 /2/7/8/./3/4/7/8 KYW/2 /2/4/./5/8/2 /2/7/8/./3/4/8/9 R CM/6 /2/5/./6/1/4 /2/7/9/./6/1/6T able /2 /: Common information ab out ro c k et launc h/-esN Name Data t/0 /(UT/) t/0 /(L T/) / /(deg/) DST /(nT/)/1 Proton No v/. /2/0 /1/9/9/8 /(D A Y /3/2/4/) /0/6/:/4/0 /1/1/:/4/0 /5/1/./6 /-/9/2 Proton Jul/. /5 /1/9/9/9 /(D A Y /1/8/6/) /1/3/:/3/2 /1/8/:/3/2 /5/1/./6 /1/1/3 Proton Oct/. /2/7 /1/9/9/9 /(D A Y /3/0/0/) /1/6/:/1/6 /2/1/:/1/6 /5/1/./6 /-/8/0/4 Sh uttle Apr/. /1/7 /1/9/9/8 /(D A Y /1/0/7/) /1/8/:/1/9 /0/3/:/1/9 /3/9 /-/3/7/5 Sh uttle Oct/. /2/9 /1/9/9/8 /(D A Y /3/0/2/) /1/9/:/1/9 /0/4/:/1/9 /2/8/./4/5 /-/1/5

arXiv:physics/0007044 14 Jul 2000SLAC-PUB-8496 LCLS-TN-00-09 5 July 2000 New Design Study and Related Experimental Program for the LCLS RF Photoinjector† M. Ferrarioa, P. R. Bolton b, J. E. Clendeninb, D. H. Dowellc, S. M. Giermanb, M. E. Hernandezb, D. Nguyend, D. T. Palmerb, J. B. Rosenzweige, J. F. Schmergeb, L. Serafinif aINFN–Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Via E. Fermi 40, 00044 Frascati (Roma), Italy bStanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA 94309, USA cBoeing Physical Sciences Research Center, Seattle, WA 98124, USA dLos Alamos National Laboratory , Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA eUCLA, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA fINFN–Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy Abstract We report the results of a recent beam dynamics study, motivated by the need to redesign the LCLS photoinjector, that lead to the discovery of a new effective working point for a split RF photoinjector. We consider the emittance compensation regime of a space charge beam: by increasing the solenoid strength, the emittance evolution shows a double minimum behavior in the drifting region. If the booster is located where the relative emittance maximum and the envelope waist occur, the second emittance minimum can be shifted to the booster exit and frozen at a very low level (0.3 mm-mrad for a 1 nC flat top bunch), to the extent that the invariant envelope matching conditions are satisfied. Standing Wave Structures or alternatively Traveling Wave Structures embedded in a Long Solenoid are both candidates as booster linac. A careful measurement of the emittance evolution as a function of position in the drifting region is necessary to verify the computation and to determine experimentally the proper position of the booster cavities. The new design study and supporting experimental program under way at the SLAC Gun Test Facility are discussed. Contributed to the 7th European Particle Accelerator Conference Vienna, Austria 26-30 June 2000 †Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF00515.NEW DESIGN STUDY AND RELATED EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM FOR THE LCLS RF PHOTOINJECTOR M. Ferrario (INFN-LNF), P. R. Bolton (SLAC),J. E. Clendenin (SLAC), D. H. Dowell (BOEING), S. M. Gierman (SLAC), M. E. Hernandez (SLAC), D. Nguyen (LANL), D. T. Palmer (SLAC), J. B. Rosenzweig (UCLA), J. F. Schmerge (SLAC), L. Serafini (INFN-MI) Abstract We report the results of a recent beam dynamics study, motivated by the need to redesign the LCLS photoinjector, that lead to the discovery of a new effective working point for a split RF photoinjector. We consider the emittance compensation regime of a space charge beam: by increasing the solenoid strength, the emittance evolution shows a double minimum behavior in the drifting region. If the booster is located where the relative emittance maximum and the envelope waist occur, the second emittance minimum can be shifted to the booster exit and frozen at a very low level (0.3 mm-mrad for a 1 nC flat top bunch), to the extent that the invariant envelope matching conditions are satisfied. Standing Wave Structures or alternatively Traveling Wave Structures embedded in a Long Solenoid are both candidates as booster linac. A careful measurement of the emittance evolution as a function of position in the drifting region is necessary to verify the computation and to determine experimentally the proper position of the booster cavities. The new design study and supporting experimental program under way at the SLAC Gun Test Facility are discussed. 1 INTRODUCTION The proposed Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) is an X-ray Free Electron Laser (FEL) that will use the final 15 GeV of the SLAC 3-km linac for the drive beam. The performance of the LCLS in the 1.5 Angstrom regime is predicated on the availability of a 1-nC, 100-A beam at the 160-MeV point with normalised rms transverse emittance of ~1 mm-mrad. An experimental program is underway at the Gun Test Facility (GTF) at SLAC to demonstrate a high- brightness beam meeting the LCLS requirements using an rf photoinjector [1]. The GTF experiment uses a 1.6-cell S- band rf gun developed jointly with BNL and UCLA [2] surrounded by a solenoid just after the gun exit. After a short drift it is followed by a standard SLAC 3-m accelerating section. A transverse normalised rms emittance of 2.4 mm- mrad for a 0.9 nC pulse with 10-ps FWHM Gaussian pulse length has been measured at BNL using a similar configuration [3]. Earlier simulation studies using the multi-particle code PARMELA predicted a transverse normalised emittance of ~1 mm-mrad - thermal emittance not included - for the LCLS photoinjector if a uniform (or even a truncated Gaussian)temporal charge distribution is used [4]. While this result technically meets the LCLS requirements, it leaves no headroom for errors or practical difficulties. Consequently simulation studies have continued with the goal of finding a photoinjector design for the LCLS that would predict a transverse emittance of no more than 0.8 mm-mrad with the thermal emittance included. 2 A NEW WORKING POINT FOR A SPLIT PHOTO-INJECTOR A detailed systematic PARMELA analysis of the beam parameters for a GTF-like system can be found in [5]. Good emittance performances and high peak current at the exit of the device can be obtained with high peak field on the cathode (140 MV/m), extraction phase 35 deg and moderate solenoid field strength (0.3 T) for a 1 nC uniform charge distribution and 10 ps long bunch with 1 mm radius. In the following analysis we will take these parameters as a starting point.We adopted the semi-analytical code HOMDYN [6] to extend the investigation to the booster matching condition, taking advantage of the fast running capability of the code to explore a wider range of parameters. The invariant envelope [7] matching condition indeed requires the beam to be injected at a laminar waist, ′=σ 0, in a matched accelerating gradient of the TW booster given by: ′=γσ γ2 20wIˆΙ where Io = 17 kA is the Alfven current. While investigating the envelope and emittance behaviour by scanning the solenoid field strength we noticed an interesting feature. By increasing the solenoid strength the emittance evolution shows a double minimum behaviour in the drifting region. For a given value of the solenoid strength (0.31 T) the envelope waist occurs where the emittance has its relative maximum (z≈1.5 m) as shown by the bold red lines in Figures 1 and 2. The performance using the new working points [8] relies on this feature of the emittance oscillation. The guess is that if we locate the booster entrance at z ≈ 1.5 and we satisfy the matching condition, the second emittance minimum could be shifted to higher energy and frozen at a lower level, taking advantage of the additional emittance compensation occurring in the booster.00.511.522.533.54 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Solenoid scan [0.26 T-0.33 T]<X>_[mm] Z_[m] Figure 1: Beam envelope versus z for different solenoid strengths. 00.511.522.533.54 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Solenoid scan [0.26 T-0.33 T]enx_[mmmrad] Z_[m] Figure 2: Beam emittance versus z for different solenoid strengths. 3 THE LCLS CASE As a first natural choice for the booster linac we consider a 3 m long constant gradient S-band TW structure, in use at SLAC since the 1960s. To satisfy the first matching condition the booster should be located at z=1.5 m, where the beam laminar waist occurs. Since the rms spot size is σx=0.41 mm, the current averaged over the slices is 96 A, and the average slice energy is 6.4 MeV, the matched accelerating gradient of the TW booster is required to be 35 MV/m. To drive the beam out of the space charge dominated regime we need two SLAC structures resulting in an energy of 216 MeV in an 8 m long injector line, allowing a 0.5 m long drift in between the two structures. As expected the second emittance minimum, 0.5 mm- mrad, now occurs downstream of the booster structures, see Fig. 3, at z=10 m (we will take this location as a reference position to quote emittance at the injector exit). An injection into the booster 12 degrees off crest is enough to compensate for the energy spread, resulting in a residual rms energy spread at the exit of the booster of 0.2 % as requiredby the LCLS specifications, see Figure 4. The peak current of 96 A is slightly below the desired value. 00.511.52 00.511.522.53 0 2 4 6 8 10Gun + 2 TW (SLAC) @35MV/m 12deg <X>_[mm] enx_[mmmrad]<X>_[mm]enx_[mmmrad] Z_[m] Figure 3: Beam envelope and emittance along the injector beam line. 5060708090100110 00.511.522.53 0 2 4 6 8 10Gun + 2 TW (SLAC) @35 MV/m 12deg I_[A] Dg/g_[%]I_[A]Dg/g_[%] Z_[m] Figure 4: Peak current and rms energy spread along the injector beam line. 00.511.522.53 00.511.522.53 0 2 4 6 8 10Gun+1TW embedded in a 3m long solenoid+1TW<X>_[mm]enx_[mmmrad] Z_[m] Figure 5: Beam envelope and emittance along the injector beam line. Despite the good emittance resulting from this design, the necessary gradient to match the beam to the booster exceeds the limit of reliable performance by the SLAC structure.We then started to look for a lower gradient solution by increasing the focusing properties of the device. This can be done by means of a long solenoid around the first TW structure. Setting the desired accelerating field of the TW section to 25 MV/m, a scanning of the solenoid strength showed a very good working point with B=800 G. Beam dynamics simulation showed a very low emittance value, 0.2 mm mrad, see Fig. 5, fulfilling at the same time the other LCLS requirements. 4 PULSE RISE TIME AND THERMAL EMITTANCE EFFECTS We investigated the emittance degradation due to a realistic pulse rise time by means of PARMELA [9] simulations. The results, seen in Fig. 6, show a very good performance of the new working point up to a 1 psec pulse rise time, the design value. 00.511.522.533.5 0100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800Emittance evolution for different laser rise times emit (ideal) emit (0.5 psec rise) emit (1 psec rise)εn (mm-mrad) z (cm) Figure 6: Emittance evolution for different laser rise time. In the previous simulations the thermal emittance, εnth, has been neglected, assuming a total emittance given by: ε ε εnTotalnthncor=( )+( )2 2 With an estimated [10] thermal emittance of 0.3 mm- mrad, for a Cu cathode with UV excitation, i. e. of the same order of the space charge correlated contribution, beam dynamics could be affected by this additional effect. Preliminary computations show that the previous assumption sets only a lower limit to the total emittance, and an additional tuning of the beam line parameters is required to recover an optimized solution. Figure 7 shows the emittance evolution as computed by including 0.3 mm-mrad thermal emittance contribution, to be compared to Figure 5. The resulting total emittance is 0.4 mm-mrad, where the strength of the long solenoid has been reduced to 700 G. 5 CONCLUSION By investigating a new design for the LCLS injector, a new working point for a split photoinjector has been found. An experimental program is under way at the SLAC GTFto measure the double emittance feature along the beam line and to determine experimentally the proper location of the booster linac. 00.511.522.5 00.511.522.5 0 2 4 6 8 102 TW + SOLENOID + THERMAL EMITTANCE (0.3 mmmrad) <X>_[mm] enx_[mmmrad]<X>_[mm]enx_[mmmrad] Z_[m] Figure 7: : Beam envelope and emittance, including 0.3 mm- mrad thermal emittance. 5 REFERENCES [1] J.F. Schmerge et al., “Photocathode rf gun emittance measurements using variable length laser pulses,” SPIE 3614 (1999) 22.[2] D.T. Palmer et al., “Emittance studies of the BNL/SLAC/UCLA 1.6 cell photocathode rf gun,” Proc. of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conf. (1997) 2687.[3] M. Babzien et al., "Observation of self-amplified spontaneous emission in the near-infrared and visible," Phys. Rev. E 57 (1998) 6093.[4] R. Alley et al., “The design for the LCLS rf photo- injector”, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A, 429 (1999), 324.[5] D. T. Palmer, “The next generation photoinjector”, PhD. Thesis, Stanford University (1998).[6] M. Ferrario, A. Mosnier, L. Serafini, F. Tazzioli, J. M. Tessier, "Multi-bunch energy spread induced by beam loading in a standing wave structure", Part. Acc., 52 (1996). [7] L. Serafini, J. B. Rosenzweig, "Envelope analysis of intense relativistic quasilaminar beams in rf photoinjectors: a theory of emittance compensation", Phys. Rev. E 55 (1997) 7565.[8] M. Ferrario, J. E. Clendenin, D. T. Palmer, J. B. Rosenzweig, L. Serafini, “HOMDYN Study For The LCLS RF Photo-Injector”, Proc. of the 2nd ICFA Adv. Acc. Workshop on “The Physics of High Brightness Beams”, UCLA, Nov., 1999, see also SLAC-PUB-8400.[9] UCLA version.[10] J. Clendenin et al., “Reduction of thermal emittance of rf guns,” Proc. of the Int. Sym. on New Visions in Laser- Beam Interactions, Tokyo, Oct. 11-15, 1999 see also SLAC-PUB-8284 (1999)

arXiv:physics/0007045v1 [physics.atom-ph] 14 Jul 2000Fixed energy inversion of 5 eV e-Xe atom scattering A. Lovell and K. Amos School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia. (January 6, 2014) Abstract Fixed energy inverse scattering theory has been used to defin e central and spin-orbit Schr¨ odinger potentials for the scattering of 5 eV polarized electrons from Xe atoms. The results are typical for a range of such data ; including energies above threshold when the potentials become comple x. The phase shifts obtained from an analysis of the measured differentia l cross section and analyzing power has been used as input data. Both semi-class ical (WKB) and fully quantal inversion methods have been used to extrac t central and spin-orbit interactions. The analysis shows that informat ion additional to the set of input phase shifts extracted from this (and similar) d ata may be needed to ascertain physical potentials. Typeset using REVT EX 1I. INTRODUCTION A knowledge of the interaction between colliding quantum sy stems is central in many applications of scattering and has relevance for use in othe r diverse fields of study. Such inter- actions have been sought in various ways with the method of nu merical inversion common. In the numerical inversion approach, the parameter values o f a purely phenomenological parametric form, chosen a priori to be the (central, local) interaction between the collidin g entities, are determined by variation until a best fit to meas ured data is found. Global inverse scattering methods [1] form an alternative procedural clas s with which to analyze the same data. With global inverse scattering methods, the interact ion between the colliding pair is extracted from the data without a priori assumptions about the shape of the potential, although it may belong to a certain broad class, and the valid ity of the dynamical equation of motion (the Schr¨ odinger equation) is assumed. Potentia ls so obtained we define here- after as inversion potentials. Application of various glob al inverse scattering methods have been made in the past for electron-atom [2], for atom-atom [3 ], and for electron-molecule [4] systems, but none of those methods permitted extraction of s pin-orbit effects. Recent de- velopments [5–7] have provided means by which spin effects ca n be treated. In this paper we present and describe results for central and spin-orbit p otentials obtained by global in- verse scattering methods. In particular we consider an appr oach based upon the WKB approximation method [1,8] and one based upon the Newton-Sa batier (N-S) theory [1]. The data of interest come from the very high quality crossed b eams experiment of Gibson et al. [9]. In that study [9], a phase shift analysis was also made an d the phase shifts so obtained were the input quantities to our studies. Those pha se shifts are purely real in line with the unitarity constraint with the energy below the first threshold. Thus we have obtained purely real inversion potentials. Extension of th e approach to deal with energies above threshold and, concomitantly with complex potential s, is straightforward. The key feature about inversion potentials, given numerical accur acy in calculations and stability of the solution, is that when used in Schr¨ odinger equations th ey lead to the same phase shifts as are input. The data set we have chosen to use is intriguing for a number of reasons. First, the differences between the values of δ+ landδ− l(the±superscripts denoting j=l±1 2) ex- tracted by the phase shift analysis [9] are not large indicat ing that the spin-orbit interaction is not strong. As a result the approximation method of Leeb, H uber and Fiedeldey [5] (LHF hereafter) can be used with confidence. Indeed the LHF sc heme is accurate through second order in Born approximation and has worked well in som e nuclear scattering data analyses [10] where the spin-orbit effect is much stronger th an in the case we study. With the LHF approximation, both the N-S and the semi-classical W KB methods of inverse scat- tering theory can be used to specify the electron-Xenon (e-X e) potentials. Exact quantal inversion methods to get the spin-orbit interaction are kno wn [6,7], but with this data the LHF approximation should be adequate and the inversion proc ess is facilitated by its use. Second, the phase shifts of significance are not many in numbe r and so this may be another case with which phase shift values at unphysical rational va lues of angular momentum are required in the inversion process to achieve a stable result [11]. A third reason for interest is that thes- andp-wave phase shifts from the analysis [9] of the scattering da ta have negative values. All other (physical) phase shifts of significance ar e positive quantities. As phase 2shifts are ambiguous to modulo π, an equivalent completely positive valued and monoton- ically decreasing phase shift set can be formed by the additi on of 2πandπto thes- and p-wave values respectively. With either of the original or th e modulated (integer l) phase shift sets as input, the N-S inversion method per se gives the same inversion potential. How- ever, that potential has a short ranged repulsion; such bein g required [12] to give significant negatives- andp-wave phase shifts. The WKB inversion method on the other han d, does discriminate between these sets since to specify the WKB inv ersion potential interpolated functions,δl(λ), are required as input. Of course if the N-S method is extend ed to use phase shifts at rational values of the angular momentum, found for example by interpolation of the original sets [9] and of the those with s- andp-wave values adjusted by 2 πandπrespectively, then the inversion potentials from the two cases must differ. Thus we give two new elements in this paper. First we deduce by inverse scattering theories, central and spin-orbit potentials for 5 eV electr on-Xenon atom scattering. Second, we show that information additional to the physical phase sh ifts (i.e. those determined by usual phase shift analyses of scattering data) is needed to i dentify the the most likely physical inversion potential. In the next section we give a pr´ ecis of the LHF approximation for phase shifts as well as of the inverse scattering methods used, the N-S and the WKB semi-classical schemes specifically. Then in Sec. III, we discuss the origin s and characteristics of the 5 eV e-Xe scattering phase shifts that have been used as input to o ur inversion studies. The e-Xe potentials that result are presented and discussed in Sec. I V and we draw conclusions in Sec. V. II. FIXED ENERGY INVERSION METHODS In this section we give brief outlines of the methods used in t he calculations, the results of which we report later. First we set out the LHF scheme by which the spin-orbit interaction can be defined from two independent (spin-less) inversion ca lculations. This identifies not only the special phase shift sets {ˆδl}and{˜δl}of the method, but also defines the central and spin-orbit potentials in terms of the results of inversi ons of those new phase shift sets, ˆVand˜Vrespectively. Then we give the salient features of the Newto n-Sabatier and the semi-classical WKB inverse scattering theories which we ha ve used to specify the ( ˆVand˜V) potentials. A. The LHF approximation While exact quantal inverse scattering theories that yield central and spin-orbit inter- actions from input scattering phase shift sets exist [6,7], Leeb, Huber, and Fiedeldey [5] developed an approximation scheme to transform the input ph ase shift sets so that more facile quantal inverse scattering methods, such as the N-S s cheme [1] and the semi-classical WKB approximation [8], can be used to give results from which central and spin-orbit po- tentials can be extracted. Those more facile schemes do not a llow for an angular momentum dependence in the intrinsic equation of motion, such as give n by a spin-orbit potential. They are designed only to provide central local potential functi ons. 3The LHF method is based on the assumption that the contributi on of the spin-orbit potential to the phase shifts can be evaluated using a Distor ted Wave Born Approximation. This technique has been formulated specifically for spin1 2particles incident on spin zero targets and is accurate to second order in the Born expansion [5]. The approximation identifies first the special phase shift sets {ˆδl}and{˜δl}, and then defines the central and spin-orbit potentials in terms of the results, ˆVand˜Vrespectively, from inversion of those new phase shift sets. For spin1 2particles incident on a spin 0 target, and allowing central a nd spin-orbit Schr¨ odinger potentials, the scattering is defined by reduc ed radial Schr¨ odinger equations d2 dρ2−l(l+ 1) ρ2+ 1−1 E/bracketleftBig Vcen(ρ) +a± lVso(ρ)/bracketrightBig ψ± l(ρ) = 0, (1) where, with ρ=kr, a± l=1 ¯h2<s·l>=/braceleftBigg l j =l+1 2 −(l+ 1)j=l−1 2(2) If the spin-orbit term is relatively weak, the usual scatter ing phase shifts, δ± l, can be expanded in powers of a± l. Specifically [5] δ± l=δcen l+a± lC(1) l(k) + (a± l)2C(2) l(k) +.... (3) While the leading term, δcen l, is due solely to the central component of the potential, Vcen, higher terms must be considered to define the spin-orbit prop erties. But the specific analytic forms of the coefficients, C(n) l, do not have to be known to extract the central and spin-orbit potential values. The LHF approximation is initiated by con sidering combinations of δ+and δ−from which separate inversion potentials can be estimated. The relevant combinations are ˜δl=1 2l+ 1/braceleftBig (l+ 1)δ+ l+lδ− l/bracerightBig =δcen l+l(l+ 1)C(2) l+..., (4) and ˆδl=1 2l+ 1/braceleftBig lδ+ l+ (l+ 1)δ− l/bracerightBig =δcen l−C(1) l+ (l2+l+ 1)C(2) l+... (5) To first order in a± l, these new phase shifts and their inversion potentials, ˜VandˆV, are ˜δl=δcen l↔˜V∼Vcen (6) ˆδl=δcen l−C(1) l↔ˆV∼Vcen−1 2Vso. (7) As these new sets of phase shifts can be inverted independent ly using any of the conventional techniques, the central and spin-orbit components can be id entified then by Vcen(r)≈˜V(r) (8) Vso(r)≈2[˜V(r)−ˆV(r)]. (9) 4B. The N-S method Since the Newton-Sabatier inverse scattering theory and ap plications have been widely reported, only pertinent points of the scheme are presented herein. A full treatment on the development of this method is given elsewhere [1]. The N-S method is one of the most successful of the fixed energy inversion methods. Very recently, it has been applied successfully to electron-hel ium atom scattering [13] using as input, experimental phase shifts of Nesbet [14] at low ℓ-values and dipole polarization phase shifts at the higher ℓ-values. But it is known [15] that fixed energy inverse scatte ring theory requires the Smatrix (equivalently the phase shifts) as a function of the a ngular momentum variable if one is to define uniquely the scattering potentia l. This equates to knowing the Smatrix exactly at all of the (infinite) set of physical l-values as then the unit step in the quantum number is infinitesimal against the range. Most stud ies of the fixed energy inverse scattering problem, and notably those involving the N-S met hod, have been applied using only the values of the Smatrix specified at a finite set ( lmax) of physical angular momentum values. In cases where there are relatively few important pa rtial wave phase shift values to be used, it may be necessary to extend [11] the usual N-S formu lation to include rational values of angular momenta to form the matrix inherent in the N -S scheme [1]. However it serves to consider for this section, just the inte ger values of angular momentum for which the Schr¨ odinger equations take the form ( ρ=krbeing dimensionless) Du(ρ)φu l(ρ) =l(l+ 1)φu l(ρ) (10) where the operator Du(ρ) =ρ2/bracketleftBiggd2 dρ2+ 1−U(ρ)/bracketrightBigg (11) withU(ρ) =V(ρ)/Ecm, whereEcm= (¯hk)2/(2µ) andρ=kr. The solutions are subject to boundary conditions φu l(ρ)−→ρ→∞Alsin/parenleftbigg ρ−1 2lπ+γl/parenrightbigg (12) withγlbeing the relevant phase shifts to be taken as input quantiti es. The N-S method gives as output U(ρ) =U0(ρ)−2 ρd dρ1 ρK(ρ,ρ) (13) whereinU0is a reference potential and K(ρ,ρ) is the Jost transformation kernel which can be written as the infinite sum of solution function products, K(ρ,ρ′) =/summationdisplay lclφu l(ρ)φu0 l(ρ′) (14) The solution functions (to Du) can be expressed by the Newton equations [1] φu l(ρ) =φu0 l(ρ)−/summationdisplay l′cl′Lll′(ρ)φu l′(ρ) (15) 5where Lll′(ρ) =/integraldisplayρ 0φu0 l(ρ′)φu0 l′(ρ′)1 ρ′2dρ′(16) These equations are of central importance. From them one can determine the unknown quantities, Aland (clAl), by matching asymptotically to the defined boundary condit ion solutions for ρ≥ρ0,ρ0being the value at which the unknown quantal interactions ar e presumed to be vanishingly small. There is also a presumptio n that the solution functions of the reference potential are completely known so that the i nitiating L-matrices can be defined exactly. The reference solutions are obtained from Du0(ρ)φu0 l(ρ) =l(l+ 1)φu0 l(ρ) (17) with φu0 l(ρ)→ρ→∞sin/parenleftbigg ρ−1 2lπ+δ0 l/parenrightbigg (18) whereδ0 lis a reference input phase shift. With the normalization and expansion coefficients so given, the complete solution functions can be determined from Eq. (15) at all ρ < ρ 0. Thereby one gets the Jost transformation kernels and thence the sought after potential. C. The WKB method In the WKB approximation with λ=l+1 2, scattering phase shifts are defined [1,12] by δ(λ) =π 2λ−kr0+/integraldisplay∞ r0[Kλ(r′)−k]dr′(19) whereKλ(r) describes the local momentum through the interaction regi on andr0is the classical turning point. Thus the scattering potential is e mbedded in Kλ(r′) and inversion amounts to an integral transformation. To effect such a trans formation it is convenient to consider the deflection function Θ(λ) = 2dδ(λ) dλ, (20) where now λis taken as the angular momentum variable. This deflection fu nction satisfies an Abel-like equation, found by applying the Sabatier trans formation, σ=kr/bracketleftBigg 1−VWKB(r) E/bracketrightBigg1 2 (21) to Eq. (19). One finds δ(λ) =−1 2E/integraldisplay∞ λQ(σ)√ σ2−λ2σdσ , (22) whereQ(σ) is a quasi-potential defined by 6Q(σ) = 2Eln/parenleftbiggσ kr/parenrightbigg . (23) The Abel-like integral equation for δ(λ) can be inverted to give Q(σ) =4E π1 σd dσ/integraldisplay∞ σδ(λ)√ σ2−λ2λdλ , (24) which can be written in terms of the deflection function as Q(σ) =2E π/integraldisplay∞ σΘ(λ)√ σ2−λ2dλ . (25) Provided there is a one to one mapping of the transcendental e quation kr=σexp/parenleftBiggQ(σ) 2E/parenrightBigg , (26) and the energy Eexceeds that at which ‘orbiting’ occurs, i.e. E >V (r) +1 2rdV dr, (27) then the Sabatier transformation equation provides the rel ationship from which the scatter- ing potential can be found, namely VWKB(r) =E/braceleftBigg 1−exp/bracketleftBigg −Q(σ) E/bracketrightBigg/bracerightBigg . (28) For largeσ, the quasi-potentials decrease so that with σ→kr,Q(σ)→V(r). As σ→0 however, the quasi-potentials diverge and the transforms then lead to the lower limits r−→r0(the turning point radius), V(r)−→E. However, in practical cases the validity of the WKB approximation breaks down at a radius larger than r0, when the transcendental relationship between σandrbecomes ambiguous. III. SPECIFICATION OF SETS OF PHASE SHIFTS The 5 eV e-Xe phase shifts determined by Gibson et.al.[9] have interesting structure notably that while the s- andp-wave phase shifts are negative, for all other l-values they are positive. The filled circles in Fig. 1 depict the the phase shifts that have been extracted from the data. The top most graph identifies the phase shifts a ssociated with the j=l+1 2 angular momentum set while the bottom panel contains those a ssociated with j=l−1 2. It is evident from the data displayed in this figure that the th ere is only a small difference between the δ± lsets. The largest difference occurs with the p-wave phase shifts, and that is only of order 0 .1c. As the phase shift analyses of the e-Xe scattering data gave n egative values for the s- andp-wave phase shifts, one can expect [12] scattering potentia ls that have a short ranged repulsion. But for e-Xe scattering it is known that the poten tial should be attractive at all radii and especially so near the origin where the incoming el ectron should feel essentially 7only the presence of the nucleus. Then one would expect the ph ase shifts for low l-values to be positive. Such can be formed with the phase shift values having a monotonic decrease withlby the addition of 2 πtoδ(+) 0andπtoδ± 1. We define such modulated values as the π-adjusted phase shifts hereafter. Naturally multiples of a ny integer amount may be used, but this new set is the simplest. The new ( π-adjusted) values are shown by the open circles in Fig. 1. Associated with such phase shifts are purely attra ctive interactions which are expected in the physical potentials for electron-atom scat tering. To investigate the effect of additional input on the form of th e inversion potentials, the two data sets were interpolated. Several interpolations we re made seeking suitable input for the different inversion schemes. A many point interpolation was made on each phase shift set to obtain the input for the WKB inversion scheme. Values o f the phase shift functions had to be found at quite small step sizes, ∆ l, since in the WKB we have to evaluate not only the deflection functions but also integrate over them (n umerically). A step size ∆ lof 0.01 was used. Also two extended sets of input phase shift value s were generated for use with the N-S scheme. One had ∆ l= 0.5 and the other ∆ l= 0.2. This was done to assess the effect of differing numbers of non-physical input on the N- S inversion potentials. The sets of interpolated phase shifts obtained using ∆ l= 0.2 are displayed in Fig. 1, with the solid and dashed curves giving the results of those (spline) interpolations. Clearly the phase shift functions so specified are no longer equivalent and so w e expect any inversion process that requires such functions as input to give different inver sion potentials. IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results we have obtained using the N-S inverse scatterin g theory are discussed first and, subsequently, those found from our WKB study of the chos en two phase shift functions are considered. We present in three subsections, the potent ials that result, the phase shifts found from solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equations contain ing those potentials, and the cross sections that ensue in each case. A. The results from N-S inverse scattering theory Our N-S studies have lead to six inversion potentials; three found by using the original phase shift values of Gibson et al. [9] and the other three obtained by using the π-adjusted phase shifts. For each case, we first calculated the N-S inver sion potentials using as input solely the phase shifts corresponding to the physical langular momentum set l∈0,1,2,...,7. Such results we identify as case 1 results, e.g. case 1 invers ion potentials from the π-adjusted phase shift sets. Two other calculations have been made with N-S inversion. First the N-S inverse scattering theory equations have been solved using the discretization ∆ l= 0.5; the results we identify by the designation case 2. The third set o f N-S calculations were made using ∆l= 0.2 to give what we term case 3 results. 81. The N-S inversion potentials Physical arguments dictate that the e-Xe scattering potent ial for 5 eV electrons should be real (the energy is below the first threshold) and to be attrac tive, with long range behavior of−|α|/r4and a short ranged one of −Ze2/r. One may also expect that the intermediate range potential would be essentially a monotonic function b etween the extremes as the charge density of the atom is believed to be a smooth function The potentials resulting from the inversion of the phase shi fts based upon the original set [9] are all strongly repulsive at small radii and hence ar e not considered physically significant. They also have marked oscillation in both their central and spin-orbit results. When used in the Schr¨ odinger equations however, the soluti ons do reproduce the input phase shifts quite well; comparable to the results we show subsequ ently. But as the inversion potentials are not consistent with the form of e-Xe potentia l dictated by knowledge of that scattering system, we consider those inversion results no f urther. In Fig. 2 the potentials obtained by inversion of the π-adjusted phase shift values are displayed. The top and bottom segments portray the central a nd spin-orbit components of the potentials respectively. The dashed, long dashed, and s olid curves represent the case 1, case 2, and case 3 potentials respectively. The dashed cur ves in this figure are identical to the results of inversion found using the original phase sh ift values of Gibson et al. [9] That is as should be since within the N-S inversion scheme mad e with just the phase shift values specified at the physical angular momenta, modulo πadjustment means that one uses exactly the same expansion wave functions in defining the int ernal matrices. But the other cases have quite different outcomes. The potentials shown in Fig. 2 tend to the physical expectation and clearly demonstrate that the inclusion of g reater numbers of phase shifts at non-integer angular momentum lead to smoother, more real istic potential forms. The inversion potential found using the phase shifts at solely t he physical angular momenta does not represent a structure expected for 5 eV electrons on Xe atoms as it has the short ranged repulsion. However between 0.75 and 2.5 a.u., that (c ase 1 central) potential has an attractive well with a depth of -1.3 a.u. while beyond 2.5 a.u . it behaves approximately as r−4. The spin-orbit component of the case 1 potential is very sma ll, is weakly attractive in the vicinity of 1 a.u., mildly repulsive between 1 and 2.5 a.u ., and after that it is essentially zero. Obviously the most realistic potential comes with the case 3 potentials found using the π- adjusted phase shift sets. That concurs with the hypothesis that the inverse scattering theory result stabilizes with increase in the number of non-intege r angular momenta phase shifts commensurate with numerical accuracy of evaluation. Essen tially the angular momentum step size should be small in comparison to the number of signi ficant partial wave input data (lmax). This case 3 potential, shown in Fig. 2 by the solid lines, ha s exactly the structure one would associate with e-Xe scattering. At small radii it i s strongly attractive and of r−1form, with a smooth transition to a long range r−4tail. There is a smooth transition between those regions. The spin-orbit results also are more reasonable. The case 3 (with π-adjusted phase shifts as input), spin-orbit potential is n ot as extensive as the others. But the spin-orbit potentials are all small in general (save for the naturally occurring divergence at the origin) and so these three results do not by themselves indicate convergence. The reproduction of phase shifts and observables, however, ten d to suggest that the results we 9show are reasonable. 2. Reproduction of the phase shifts An indication of the success of an inversion scheme is to repr oduce the input phase shifts from solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equations using the inve rsion potentials. In this case such reproduction is reasonably good but not exact; perhaps being a measure of the LHF approximation. In Fig. 3, the original phase shift values [9] are portrayed b y the filled circles and are compared with those obtained (at integer angular momenta) u sing each of the three inversion potentials defined by the π-adjusted input sets. Case 1 results lie within the filled cir cles, case 2 values are shown by the open squares, and case 3 gave the results portrayed by the open circles. The three lines now are meant only to guide the e ye by connecting the phase shift values arising from use of the three inversion potenti als. The best reproduction of the phase shifts defined from experi ment [9] is found by us- ing the case 1 inversion potential, notwithstanding that th e potential contains unphysical characteristics. Essentially, the inversion scheme in thi s case produces a potential that has been defined from just the two sets of eight phase shift values found by Gibson et al. at the physical values of l= 0 tol= 7. Case 2 and 3 potentials, on the other hand, were built usin g many more phase shifts specified at non-integer l-values and as the inversion potentials then seek to reproduce all of those extra values equally well, sma ll variations in the results at the 8 physicall-values from the sets of Gibson et al. can result. The choice of those additional (unphysical) phase shifts then is crucial if the resulting p otentials are to reproduce the eight physical values very well. One has to balance the need for a su fficiently large basis so that the inversion potential has stabilized to the proper (physi cally credible) limit, against the numerical accuracy one needs to achieve with reproduction o f the physical phase shifts and scattering data. A source of possible error in addition is the choice that must be taken for the phase shift at the unphysical point δj=−1 2 0. That value is needed in the calculations of both ˜δand ˆδand also in the N-S scheme. This choice has the potential to in troduce error since its value influences the interpolation. A poor choice of this val ue can become evident when the inversion potential is used to recalculate the phase shi fts, particularly for the low- l partial waves. A reasonable choice seems to be to set the phas e shiftδj=−1 2 0equal toδj=+1 2 0. Admittedly this is an arbitrary point. In this study, two cho ices were considered; the first being to take δj=−1 2 0=δj=+1 2 0and the other to use an Akima spline to determine the value by extrapolation. In this study allowing the Akima spline to de termine this point was slightly more successful. 3. The cross section from the N-S inversion potentials Although the potentials all look reasonably good, particul arly that found from case 3 with theπ-adjusted input phase shifts, the further test of the invers ion results is to see how accurately use of the potentials reproduce experimental da ta. This is displayed in Fig. 4 wherein the experimental data (with error bars) as found by G ibsonet al. [9] are compared 10with the cross sections calculated from the three inversion potentials obtained using the π- adjusted phase shift sets. Those results found using the cas e 1, case 2, and case 3 inversion potentials are depicted by the dashed, long dashed , and soli d curves respectively. Further we display the results here on a linear scale to distinguish the bulk of the results in relationship to the error bars. Later when discussing the WKB calculated c ross sections, we will display also the case 3 N-S comparison with data shown on a semi-logar ithmic plot. That emphasizes the comparison of results with data at the large scattering a ngles and particularly in the vicinity of the minima as 120◦. As one might expect from the reproduction of the phase shifts, we see in Fig. 4 that a good reproduction of the cross- section data is found with the case 1 results. That result passes through the error bars of m ost data points. The case 2 cross section has similar structure to the experimental da ta, but the shape is slightly at variance falling just outside the error bars associated wit h a number of the data. The case 3 cross section however is in excellent agreement with most o f the experimental data. In general it falls within most of the data error bars except at t he larger scattering angles; the latter indicative of the phase shifts at integer values of lnot being reproduced with sufficient accuracy. B. The results from semi-classical WKB inversion theory The WKB inversion results have been obtained by forming the ˜δ(λ) and ˆδ(λ) phase shift functions and using them to evaluate two quasi-potent ials. The potentials that result are discussed in the first subsection. Subsequently we prese nt and discuss the phase shift reproductions and the cross sections that result on using th ose inversion potentials. 1. The WKB inversion potentials The inversion potentials we have found using the semi-class ical WKB methods are pre- sented in Fig. 5. Once again the central potential is shown in the top section of the figure; the spin-orbit potential in the bottom. Clearly two very diff erent structures have been gen- erated. The result from using the π-adjusted functions has physically sensible characterist ics but that found using the deflection function defined from the o riginal phase shifts does not. Indeed the inversion procedure based upon the original phas e shift set does not lead to a spin-orbit potential one can identify as anything sensible and so that is not displayed. Theπ-adjusted phase shift data sets give smooth monotonic phase shift functions and hence work well with the WKB scheme. Furthermore it leads to t he form of potential (the continuous lines in Fig. 5) one would expect for the cent ral component of an e-Xe interaction, i.e. a smooth function which is highly attract ive toward the origin and has an attractiver−4long range behavior. The spin-orbit component of the potent ial would also be small and short ranged. Essentially the potential from this WKB analysis that is displayed in Fig. 5 has this desired prescription. However, given that the input was not optimally smooth at large angular momenta (close inspection of the inp ut data showed that there were small oscillations in the phase shift functions), ther e are small oscillations at large radii in the WKB inversion potential. Nevertheless, by smoothing , the long range WKB inversion 11potential does behave on average like r−4and the central component of this WKB inversion potential resembles that found using the N-S scheme. Only the central potential found from WKB inversion of the or iginal phase shift data [9] is shown in Fig. 5 (by the long dashed line). Quite evidently i t is nonsensical. It exhibits ambiguous behavior at many radii, resulting from a loss of 1: 1 correspondence between σ andrin this case. Apparently if the input phase shift function co ntains a large degree of curvature then that input is unsuitable for use with the WKB p rocedure. This is emphasized when one considers the deflection function, quasi-potentia l, and the associated σvsrplots. The deflection function resulting from differentiating the p hase shift function defined from interpolation of the original phase shift values, has a rapi d variation as is evident from the top panel in Fig. 6. Consequently the quasi-potential will a lso be quite structured and that is shown in the middle panel of Fig. 6. As a result the stabilit y condition breaks down at a fairly large radius. This condition, the correspondence b etweenσandr, is displayed in the bottom section of Fig. 6. Clearly between 3 and 5 a.u. ther e is an ambiguous relation withσand so one finds ambiguous values of the associated WKB invers ion potential in that region. Indeed one can only hope to ascribe a sensible result with this input to the WKB inversion for radii then in excess of 4 - 5 a.u. The realistic e-Xe potentials found by using the π-adjusted phase shift sets and with both the N-S (case 3) and WKB inversion schemes, are compared in Fig. 7. The potentials found using the N-S scheme are shown by the solid curves while those found by WKB inversion are displayed by the filled circles. The latter are taken to the limit radius at which the 1:1 correspondence between σandris maintained. Overall the (semi-classical) WKB potentials compare very well with those found using the (ful l quantal) N-S scheme. Clearly the central potentials look almost exactly the same. There a re differences between those two which become apparent when the observables are calculat ed. On the other hand, the spin-orbit WKB potential is very smooth and weak in comparis on to the corresponding N-S component. Also it is repulsive at all radii while the N-S pot ential has a small attractive well between approximately 0.3 and 0.6 a.u. 2. Reproduction of the phase shifts Despite the very pleasing form generated for the potential u sing the WKB scheme, the reproduction of the phase shifts, although reasonable, is n ot as good as those generated using the N-S scheme. However this discrepancy is not discon certing given that the WKB scheme is a semi-classical approximation. The phase shifts found from our WKB calculation are shown by the open circles in Fig. 8, and joining lines have been included solely to guide the eye. The data of Gibson et al. [9] again are represented by the filled black circles. As with the N-S case, part of the discrepancy between the calcul ated values and the data may be due to the ambiguity with the interpolation required to sp ecify the phase shift functions and particularly for points below l= 1 for the j=l−1 2input set. A spline was used to determine the deflection function, and th at influences the quasi- potential and ultimately also the potential. Given that poi nts found from the j=l−1 2 input set are extrapolated for values of λ<1 2, ambiguity in those values is inevitable. That ambiguity persists when these splined values are used to det ermine the input functions ˜δl(λ) andˆδl(λ). That may result in a poor reproduction of the physical phas e shifts, particularly 12of thes- andp-wave values when the solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equatio ns specified with the relevant WKB potentials are found to complete the study l oop. 3. The cross section from the WKB inversion potentials Already, from the reproduction of the phase shifts, we suspe ct that with the WKB method, reproduction of the cross section will not be as good as that obtained using the relevant N-S inversion potentials. This is indeed true. The solid curve shown in Fig. 9 depicts the WKB cross section result which is compared therein again st the Gibson et al. data [9] and also against the cross section determined by using the pr eferred case 3 N-S inversion potential (shown by the dashed curve). We now present the res ults in a semi-logarithmic plot since WKB cross section is similar in magnitude to the da ta, however it does not display quite the right structure at any scattering angle. The repro duction simply is not as good as that found using the N-S scheme. This figure also emphasizes t he mismatch of the case 3 N-S inversion results at large angles that we commented on ea rlier. V. CONCLUSIONS Inversion potentials for the 5 eV electron-Xenon atom inter action have been found using both the full quantal N-S and the semi-classical WKB inverse scattering theories. The results from application of the N-S inversion were very good . Several inputs were used in this approach, each containing a different number of phase sh ift values. From solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equations specified with each of the pote ntials, ‘inversion’ phase shifts were extracted that reproduced well the starting (physical ) phase shift values and also the empirical cross section. However, when the input was taken s olely to be the (physical) phase shifts at integer- lvalues of angular momenta, the inversion potential contain s a marked repulsion at small radii. That is not physical. With increas ed numbers of input data specified at non-integer values of angular momentum, invers ion produced a potential with sensible (physically credible) characteristics. As two disparate inversion methods find central e-Xe potenti als that are essentially the same and have pertinent physical properties of the scatteri ng system, we are confident that the N-S approach has (nearly) converged and that the central potential obtained by expanded π-adjusted physical phase shift sets is the appropriate cand idate for the local Schr¨ odinger interaction. The spin-orbit potential is reasonable but mo re detailed investigations are needed before the characteristics found for it can be adopte d with confidence. The similarity between the WKB and N-S inversion potentials also implies that the introduction of unphysical phase shifts in the N-S calculat ion is essential if a stable inversion potential is to be obtained in this case. That would be so with other energies measured [9] and, by implication, for any such electron-atom scattering at eV energies. There is the difficulty however, of accurately specifying the phase shift s for non-integer angular momenta. Obviously some kind of a priori information regarding the colliding system is necessary. I n this instance simply π-adjusting the given phase shift data sufficed. 13REFERENCES [1] K. Chadan and P. S. Sabatier. Inverse Problems in Quantum Scattering Theory 2ndEdition (Berlin, Springer, 1989). [2] L. J. Allen. Phys. Rev. A 34, 2708 (1986); L. J. Allen and I. E. McCarthy. Phys. Rev. A36, 2570 (1987). [3] D. R. Lun, X. J. Chen, L. J. Allen, and K. Amos, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4025 (1994). [4] D. R. Lun, K. Amos, and L. J. Allen, Phys. Rev. A 53, 831 (1996). [5] H. Leeb, H. Huber, and H. Fiedeldey, Phys. Letts. B344 , 18 (1995). [6] H. Huber and H. Leeb, Eur. Phys. J. A1, 221 (1998); J. Phys. G 24, 1287 (1998). [7] D. R. Lun and S. J. Buckman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 541 (1997); D. R. Lun, M. Ebersp¨ acher, K. Amos, W. Scheid, and S. J. Buckman, Phys. Re v. A58, 4993 (1998). [8] H. Fiedeldey, R. Lipperheide, K. Naidoo and S. A. Sofianos Phys. Rev. C 30, 434 (1984). [9] J. C. Gibson, D. R. Lun, L. J. Allen, R. P. McEachran, L. A. P arcell, and S. J. Buckman, J. Phys B 31, 3949 (1998). [10] N. Alexander, K. Amos, B. Apagyi, and D. R. Lun, Phys. Rev . C53, 88 (1996). [11] M. Ebersp¨ acher, K. Amos, and B. Apagyi, Phys. Rev. C 61, 64605 (2000). [12] R. G. Newton, Scattering of Waves and Particles , 2nd edition, (Springer-Verlag, New York), (1982). [13] Z. Harman, Elektron-h´ elium ¨ utk¨ oz´ es effekt´ ıv k¨ olcs¨ onhat´ as´ a nak meghat´ aroz´ asa k´ ıs´ erleti sz´ or´ asadatokb´ ol , Scientific Student Work, (Technical University of Budapes t), Budapest, 1999 (unpublished). [14] R. K. Nesbet. J. Phys. B12, L243 (1979); Phys. Rev. A 20, 58 (1979). [15] J. J. Loeffel, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 8, 339 (1968). 14FIGURES 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 λ−20246δl(−) (rad)−20246δl(+) (rad) FIG. 1. The scattering phase shifts found from a phase shift a nalysis of 5 eV e-Xe scattering data. The filled circles are the results specified by Gibson et al. [9] while the open circle are the π-adjusted values. The results of interpolations of the basi c two sets of (physical) phase shifts are portrayed by the solid and dashed curves. 150 1 2 3 4 5 Radius (a.u.)−0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.40.6Vso(a.u.)−6−4−202Vcen(a.u.) FIG. 2. Potentials (central top; spin-orbit bottom) obtain ed from N-S inversion of the three sets of phase shift values described in the text and formed by using the π-adjusted phase shift values. The dashed, long dashed and solid curves depict the r esults designated cases 1, 2, and 3 in the text respectively. 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 l−0.500.51δl(−) (rad)−1−0.500.51δl(+) (rad) FIG. 3. The 5 eV e-Xe phase shifts obtained from the potential s shown in Fig. 2 compared with the values specified by Gibson et al. [9]. Note that the lines are simply to guide the eye and to identify the three cases. The notation is as used in Fig. 2. 170 60 120 180 θc.m. (deg)04812dσ/dΩ (A2/sr) FIG. 4. The 5 eV e-Xe differential cross sections obtained fro m the potentials shown in Fig. 2 compared with the data of Gibson et al. [9] (dots with error bars). The notation defining the results from the three cases is as in Fig. 2. 180 1 2 3 4 5 6 Radius (a.u.)−0.100.10.20.3Vso (a.u.)−3−2−101Vcen (a.u.) FIG. 5. Potentials (central top; spin-orbit bottom) obtain ed from WKB inversion of the phase shift functions described in the text. The solid curves depi ct the results found using the π-adjusted phase shifts to define the phase shift function; the long dash ed curve gives the (central) potential found using actual Gibson et al. [9] tabled values for that purpose. 190 1 2 3 4 5 6 σ−2−10123Q(σ)0 1 2 3 4 5 6 λ−3−2−101234Θ(λ) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Radius (a.u.)0246810σ FIG. 6. The deflection function (top), the quasi-potential ( middle), and the σvsrplot (bottom) from the WKB study framed upon the original phase sh ift values of Gibson et al. [9]. 200 1 2 3 4 5 6 Radius (a.u.)−0.4−0.200.20.4Vso(a.u.)−4−3−2−1012Vcen(a.u.) FIG. 7. Comparison of the WKB inversion potentials (filled ci rcles) with those of the case 3 N-S inversion study made using phase shift sets from interpo lation of the π-adjusted phase shifts of Gibson et al. [9]. 210 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 l−1−0.500.51δl(−)(rad)−1−0.500.51δl(+)(rad) FIG. 8. The 5 eV e-Xe phase shifts obtained from the (realisti c) potential shown in Fig. 5 compared with the values specified by Gibson et al. [9]. Note that the lines are simply to guide the eye. 220 30 60 90 120 150 180 θcm(deg)0110100dσ/dΩ (A2/sr) FIG. 9. The 5 eV e-Xe differential cross section obtained from the WKB potential (solid curve) compared with the data of Gibson et al. [9] as well as with the case 3 N-S result (dashed curve). Both inversion studies used interpolations of the π-adjusted set of phase shifts as input data. 23

arXiv:physics/0007046v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 14 Jul 2000METHOD OF LASER-RADIATION GUIDING IN PLASMA Arsen G. Khachatryan Yerevan Physics Institute, Alikhanian Brothers Street 2, Y erevan 375036, Armenia The diffraction broadening of the intense laser radiation re - stricts its efficient use in many applications. Proposed in th e present work is a method for laser radiation guiding in a dens ity channel formed in plasma by a relativistic electron beam. Th e conditions and parameters of the relativistic beam ensurin g the guiding by means of the proposed method have been examined. PACS number(s): 52.40.Mj, 52.40.Nk The progress in the technology of high-intensity lasers ope ns new oppor- tunities for use of lasers in many branches of science and ind ustry. Last years the chirped-pulse amplification technique [1] permit ted the production of subpicosecond laser pulses of multiterrawatt power with peak intensity up to 1019W/cm2[2]. With intensities as such we practically have to do with a new interaction range of laser radiation with matter, where the role played by the nonlinear effects is often essential. At presen t the interac- tions of high-power laser radiation with plasma are activel y investigated in connection with different applications: the excitation of s trong plasma wake waves for acceleration of charged particles with accelerat ion rates to tens of GeV/m [3]; generation, due to nonlinear interaction with plasma, of radia- tion at harmonics of carrier laser frequency [4]; the “photo n acceleration” [5]; X-ray sources [6] etc. Note also such application ranges of l aser radiation as the Compton scattering, laser cooling of charged particle b eams, the inertial fusion. The diffraction broadening of laser radiation is one of the pr incipal phe- nomena (and frequently the primary phenomenon) inhibiting the effective use of the energy of laser in many applications. In vacuum, th e laser spot sizersgrows with the longitudinal coordinate according to the for mula rs=r0(1 +z2/Z2 R)1/2, where ZR=πr2 0/λis the Rayleigh length, r0is the minimum spot size at the focal point and λis the laser wavelength. Ow- ing to that, the intensity of radiation quickly decreases as the laser beam propagates. For high-intensity laser pulses the value of ZRis usually of the order of several millimeters. For instance, in the Laser Wak efield Accelerator (LWFA) scheme the increment in the energy of electrons accel erated by the 1longitudinal field of wake wave, excited by a short laser puls e in plasma, is limited by the value eπZ REz[3], where Ezis the amplitude of accelerating electric field of the plasma wave, eis the charge of electron. Thus, without optical guiding the diffraction limits the laser-matter int eraction distance to a few Rayleigh length. In a medium, in particular, in plasma, if the index of refract ion is max- imum at the axis of laser beam and decreases in the radial dire ction to its periphery, one can eliminate or slow down the process of diffr action broad- ening of laser radiation (see review in Ref. [7] and numerous references therein). For the laser radiation with power P > P c= 2c(e/re)2[ω/ω pe(r= 0)]2≈17[ω/ω pe(r= 0)]2GW, where re=e2/mec2is the classical elec- tron radius, ωis the frequency of laser radiation, ωpeis the plasma fre- quency, there takes place a relativistic self-focusing .However, for short pulses with the length l/lessorsimilarπc /ω pe, the relativistic self-focusing proves in- efficient for prevention of diffraction broadening [7]. In the experiments the plasma channel is usually formed in the gas or plasma by a lase r pulse that, in its turn, is also subject to diffraction. E.g., the parabol ic plasma den- sity profile np=n0+ ∆nr2/r2 0may provide the guiding of low-intensity [a2 0= (eE0/mecω)2≪1, where E0is the amplitude of laser radiation] Gaus- sian laser beam if ∆ n≥∆nc= 1/πrer2 0= 1.13×1020/r2 0[µm]cm−3[7]. The guiding of laser radiation in the preformed plasma densi ty channel at distances from several millimeters to 1-3 cmhas been demonstrated by dif- ferent groups of researchers. In the present work for format ion of a plasma channel we propose to use a long relativistic electron beam ( REB). REB may traverse, without any essential changes in parameters, the distances in plasma that are much longer than the Rayleigh length of high- intensity laser pulses. The main advantage of the proposed method consists, hence, in the fact that REB can form a plasma channel with lengths much exce eding those obtained in the experiments under survey. So, the method in q uestion could provide longer-term interaction of high-intensity laser r adiation with plasma, as well as with relativistic electrons. Consider the propagation of a cylindrical electron beam wit h velocity v0=ezv0in cold homogeneous plasma. From the Poisson equation, the equation of motion and the continuity equation for plasma el ectrons (the plasma ions are taken to be immobile due to their large mass) w e have: ∂2δne ∂t2+ω2 pe(δne+nb) = 0, (1) 2where δne=ne−n0,neis the density of plasma electrons, n0is their equilib- rium density, nbis the density of electrons in the beam, ωpe= (4πn0e2/me)1/2 is the plasma frequency. In case of long beam with the length m uch exceed- ing the plasma wavelength λp= 2πv0/ωpe, and density nb=nb(r), one can omit the first term in Eq. (1). Then one has ne(r) =n0−nb(r). (2) The plasma electrons are blown out of the beam and a density pr ofile (2) is established. Though Eq. (1) was obtained for the linear case when nb≪n0, the expression (2) holds true also for nb/lessorsimilarn0. So, for a function nb(r) decreasing as rwe have a plasma electron density channel. At the same time, the summary density of electrons is constant, ne+nb=n0=const, and is equal to the density of ions, and, therefore, the force acting on the ions of plasma is zero. In this paper we shall show that in spite of t he summary density of electrons during the traversal of long electron b eam through plasma is constant, the guiding of laser radiation in this case is po ssible. The problem of the formation of plasma channel and the stability of elect ron beam will be discussed below. For consideration of the problem of laser radiation guiding in the plasma density channel with density (2), first examine the dispersi on properties of electromagnetic (EM) waves in the channel. From the Maxwell equations one can has for the electric field strength of EM wave rotrotE=∇(∇E)−∆E=−c−2(∂2E/∂t2+ 4π∂j/∂t), (3) wherej=−e(neve+nbvb) is the density of current, ve,vbare the velocities of plasma electrons and beam respectively. For a linearly po larized wave, E=exEx=exE0exp[i(ωt−kz)],B=ey(ck/ω)Ex, where Bis the vector of magnetic induction, we obtain from (3) (k2c2−ω2)Ex=4πe[ne(r)∂vex/∂t+nb(r)∂vbx/∂t]. (4) On obtaining the expression (4) we assumed that the response of plasma channel to the propagation of the laser radiation is linear, hence the change ofneandnbunder action of EM wave is negligible (that is, nonlinear ter ms vex∂ne/∂tandvbx∂nb/∂tare threw away). This takes place when a2 0= (eE0/mecω)2≪1 [3]. To be exact, in our case Eq. (4) is valid if the change in the density of plasma electrons under the action of EM wave, that 3is proportional to a2 0, is much less than the change of density under the action of electron beam, i. e. , a2 0≪nb/n0. The derivatives of velocities vexand vbxin the right hand side of Eq. (4) will be obtained from the equa tions of motion: ∂vex ∂t=−e meEx, (5.1) (∂ ∂t+vbz∂ ∂z)(vbxγb) =−e me(Ex+vbz cBy), (5.2) where γb= (1−v2 b/c2)−1/2is a relativistic factor. In case of relativistic electron beam, when γ0= (1−v2 0/c2)−1/2≫1, we can put vbx≪vbz≈v0≈c. Taking into account that γ2 0v2 bx/c2= (eEx/mecω)2=a2≪1, we obtain from (5.2)∂vbx/∂t=−(e/m eγ0)Ex. Substituting this expression and Eq. (5.1) into Eq. (4) and taking into account (2) we obtain the followi ng dispersion relation ω2=k2c2+ω2 pe[1−α(1−γ−1 0)]≈k2c2+ω2 pe(1−α), (6) where α=nb(r)/n0. In the absence of beam ( α= 0) one has from (6) an ordinary dispersion relation for transverse waves in col d homogeneous plasma. The expression (6) is valid also for the case of a circ ularly polarized wave, because one can write that as a superposition of two lin early polarized waves. So, although the summary density of electrons nb+ne=const, EM wave does not ”feel” the relativistic electron beam owing to the fact that the relativistic mass of beam electrons is much larger than the m ass of plasma electrons, just as the ions make negligible contribution to the dispersion relation thanks to their large mass. For this reason, instea d of REB one can use a beam of relativistic or nonrelativistic negativel y charged ions. It is noteworthy also that instead of a continuous beam one can u se a long succession of bunches, the separation between which is much less than the plasma wavelength. EM wave can propagate both along and oppo site REB. The latter is important for such applications as Compton sca ttering or a plasma-based free electron laser [8]. From Eq. (6) we have for the index of refraction N=ck/ωof EM wave (laser radiation) N2= 1−[1−α(r)]ω2 pe/ω2. (7) 4The guiding of laser radiation is possible when the conditio ndN/dr = (ω2 pe/2Nω2)dα/dr < 0 is observed. Consider now a parabolic profile of the electron beam density, α=α0(1−r2/r2 b),r < r b, and the Gaus- sian profile of the laser radiation, a= (a0r0/rs) exp(−r2/r2 s). Then ne(r) = ne(0)+nb(0)r2/r2 b, where ne(0) = n0−nb(0). In this case the plasma electron density channel produced by REB provides the laser radiatio n guiding when (see Chapter VI in Ref. [7]) nb(0)>∆nc(rbr0)2/r4 s. (8) For instance, when rb=rs= 2r0andr0= 500 µm,we have nb(0)>1.13× 1014cm−3, and the Rayleigh length is ZR≈7.85cmfor the wavelength of laser radiation λ= 10µm. The linear case ( δne≪n0) considered above was when a2 0≪α0≪1. At the violation of this condition the mathematical descripti on of the problem is complicated, but the guiding again is possible. Moreover, o ne can weaken the condition of guidance. In case when a2 0/greaterorsimilarα0, one can weaken the condition of guidance (8) for the long laser beam ( l≫λp), first, because of the fact that the plasma electrons are blown out of the channel by the l aser radiation owing to which the effect of guiding is amplified, and, second, due to the effect of relativistic self-focusing. When a2 0≪1, the condition of laser radiation guiding in this case takes on the form (see Ref. [7]): P Pc+a2 0 2r2 0 r2 s+nb(0) ∆ncr4 s (rbr0)2>1. The large gradient of plasma density in the channel may be for med by a dense REB when nb/greaterorsimilarn0. In this case there is formed a range close to the beam axis, where all plasma electrons are driven out. For a th in beam ( with the radius rb≪λp) such a range is formed when nb> n0, and for a broad beam ( rb≫λp) - when nb> n0/2, the diameter of range increasing with the beam density [9]. Now consider the problems of plasma channel formation and th e plasma stability. To avoid the excitation of plasma wave by the lead ing edge of electron beam, the density of REB at the entry into plasma sho uld grow rather slowly, to wit as tb≫ω−1 pewhere tbis the rise time of beam density. However, for applications connected with the acceleration of charged particles the excitation of plasma wave by the electron beam may prove d esirable. During the flight of REB through plasma it is subject to differe nt forms of 5instability. The condition of neglect of an instability may be written in the formδ∆t/lessorsimilar1, where δis an increment of the instability and ∆ tis the time of flight of electron beam through plasma; for relativis tic beam ∆ t≈ l /c, where lis the length of plasma column. The most quickly developing instability is the beam-plasma instability as a result of wh ich a plasma wave with wave number k≈ωpe/v0is excited. The development of beam-plasma instability leads eventually to a breakage of beam into bunc hes flying with the period of plasma wave. The increment of beam-plasma inst ability for waves propagating along the direction of electron beam fligh t (i.e., along z axis) is (see, e.g., Ref. [10]) δ= (31/2/24/3)ωpe(nb/n0)1/3/γ0. (9) It follows from (9) that the increment of beam-plasma instab ility decreases with increasing energy of beam electrons, i.e., for sufficien tly large γ0one can neglect the instability. According to (9), one can neglect t he instability for γ0/greaterorsimilar1.3×10−6n1/2 0[cm−3](nb/n0)1/3l[cm]. Forn0= 1014cm−3,nb/n0= 0.1 and l= 50cm, one has γ0/greaterorsimilar300. The devel- opment of beam-plasma instability may be desirable for a num ber of appli- cations, e.g., for generation of picosecond and femtosecon d electron bunches. In this case the wake wave excited by a short laser pulse in the plasma chan- nel produced by the electron beam would enable one to control the beam instability. Consider the problem of guiding from an energetic point of vi ew. The energy density of REB and laser beam are respectively WREB=mec2γ0nb andWLas=E2 0/8π= (mecω/e)2a2 0/8π, and for their ratio one has κ≡WREB WLas=2γ0(nb/n0) a2 0/parenleftbiggλ λp/parenrightbigg2 . (10) The wavelength λof modern high-intensity lasers is in order of several mi- crometer (the value of λ≈1µmis typical for a solid state laser and λ≈10µm for the CO 2laser). In the case n0= 1014cm−3,nb/n0= 0.1,γ0= 300, λ= 1µm, and a2 0= 0.05 (that corresponds to the circularly polarized laser beam intensity I≈1.4×1017W/cm2) from expression (10) follows κ≈1.08×10−4. When n0= 1016cm−3,nb/n0= 0.1,γ0= 100, λ= 10µm, anda2 0= 0.1 (I≈2.8×1015W/cm2) one has κ≈0.18. Thus, REB allows to 6guide laser radiation with the energy density much exceedin g that of REB. The total energy of REB εREB∼πr2 blREBWREB, for practically interesting parameters of the problem, can be more or less than the total e nergy of laser beam εREB∼πr2 0lLasWLas; here lREBandlLasare respectively the length of REB and laser beam. It was shown above that the relativistic electron beam can fo rm a channel in plasma, in which the laser radiation guiding is possible. The proposed guiding method is based on the capacity of relativistic elec tron beam to traverse, without essential change in parameters, the dist ances in plasma much larger than the diffraction length of high-intensity la ser radiation. The plasma electrons are blown out of the range occupied by REB, a s a result of which a plasma channel is formed in plasma, the density in whi ch increases in radial direction. It was shown that owing to large relativis tic factor of REB, its contribution to the dispersion properties of channel is negligible. The method under consideration permits an essential increase i n the interaction time of laser radiation with plasma and electron beam and, he nce, in the efficiency of using the radiation energy. The author gratefully acknowledges helpful discussions wi th Dr. B. Hafizi, Dr. R. Hubbard, and Dr. P. Sprangle (Naval Research Laborato ry, Wash- ington, DC). REFERENCES [1] D. Strickland and G. Mourou, Opt. Commun., 56, 219 (1985). [2] M. D. Perry, In: Advanced accelerator concepts, edited by P. Schoes- sow, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 335, 1995. [3] E. Esarey, P. Sprangle, J. Krall, and A. Ting, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.24, 252 (1996). [4] P. Sprangle, E. Esarey, and A. Ting, Phys. Rev. A 41, 4463 (1990). [5] S. C. Wilks, J. M. Dawson, W. B. Mori, T. Katsouleas, and M. E. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2600 (1989). [6] N. H. Burnett and P. B. Corkum, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 6, 1195 (1989). [7] E. Esarey, P. Sprangle, J. Krall, and A. Ting, IEEE J. Quan tum Electron., 33, 1879 (1997). [8] K. Nakajima, M. Kando, T. Kawakubo, T. Nakanishi, and A. O gata, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 375, 575 (1996). [9] I. A. Kotel’nikov and V. N. Khudik, Fizika Plazmy, 23,146 (1997) [Plasma Phys. Rep., 23, 130 (1997)]. 7[10] A. B. Mikhailovskii, Theory of Plasma Instabilities (Consultants Bu- reau, New York, 1974), Vol. I. 8

G. Van Hooydonk, Comment to P. Froelich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4577, 2000l) 1Comment on "Hydrogen-Antihydrogen Collisions" For the prototype of matter/antimatter interactions (1a) H + H →[HH] →pp + ee (1a) Froelich et al. found [1] that H H, like an atomcule [2], can survive longer than expected. Unfortunately, they did not calculate the PEC (potential energy curve) of intermediate 4-fermion complex H H, which is very close to that of H 2 [3]. This places constraints on matter/antimatter reactions in general and on H H in (1a) in particular. A perfect Babel of tongues on conventional "matter" results when considering matter/antimatter reactions like Ps + Ps →PsPs (Ps2) (1b) CP-symmetries in neutral N-particle systems (N=2,3,4), with centers of mass c M and of charges c C, illustrate this: (i) N=2; short living (10-12 sec) charge-conjugated pairs Px (positronium Ps, protonium Pn); c M and c C coincide. Pseudo atom Ps is stable , energy and spectrum derive from Bohr theory. Ps belongs to the "matter" domain, although it consists of equal amounts of matter and antimatter ( e;e). By symmetry, Ps may be classified as antimatter. But if Ps is "matter", antipositronium Ps is "antimatter" (see below). Mass-asymmetrical pairs ( p;e in H, p;e in H) are stable. (ii) N=3; charge-conjugated pairs in atomcules ; cM near cC. Antiprotonic helium He+p has a lifetime of µsec, longer than Ps. It is new "matter" [2]. Antiparticle He-p is not (yet) observed. In (i)-(ii), "matter" is a matter/antimatter pair. (iii) N=4; atom/antiatom pairs as in (1); c M and c C do not coincide. Molecules X X, if stable, are "matter" and building blocks are matter/antimatter pairs. C-symmetry in atom and antiatom is broken by lepton/nucleon mass difference. Annihilation is hampered and lifetimes may equal or exceed that in (ii). Even mass symmetrical N=4 systems like Ps 2 in (1b) are believed to be stable [4] (see also below). If, in reality, "matter" consists of matter/antimatter pairs, this leads to confusion. Neutrality requires 1/1 contributions in terms of charges not of masses. Short lifetimes apply if N=2 and c M coincides with c C. But simply rotating Ps gives Ps due to mass symmetry. Comparing all forms as in (1c) Ps2(↑↑) + Ps2(↓↓)→ PsPs(↑↓) + PsPs(↓↑)(1c) gives symmetric/antisymmetric parallel dipole alignments. Internal C-symmetry in Ps 2 becomes a P-symmetry effect, PsPs. By mirror-symmetry and with respect to the Ps Ps-cM, Ps is left- Ps L and Ps right-handed Ps R (or vice versa). As with Ps, Ps Ps is either matter or antimatter. Is it also stable "matter"? If R separates the centers of mass (or charge) and if a is the Ps-radius, interactions V(R) in (1c) for R >> a are V↑↓(R) = -2e2/R +2e2/√(R2 + 2a2)= -2e2a2/R3(2a) V↑↑(R)= -V ↑↓(R) =(-1 )pV↑↓(R) = +2e2a2/R3(2b) if parity operator p=1. With (2a), stable "matter" Ps 2 [4], not yet observed [5], is matter/antimatter pair Ps RPsL. Operator p in 4-fermion Hamiltonians leads generically to singlet-triplet splitting [3]. The drastic effect of Coulombinteractions (2) applies to 4-fermion complexes in (1), not to the threshold 2-fermion systems. But, unlike in Ps 2, rotation has a different effect on energy than inversion of charges if cM and c C do not coincide, as in H H [3]. In cold atom region R/Re = 20, difference is 0.01 cm-1 in favor of a charge- inverted state [3]. Matter/antimatter pair H H in (1a) can also be "matter" with not too short a lifetime [1]. This might explain finally why an H H-PEC matches the observed H 2- PEC [3]. Chemical gaps α2µc2, Coulomb thresholds e2/Re for mass asymmetrical charge-conjugated ion pairs X+X-, are 10-7 times annihilation gaps m Xc2 [3]. The 4 different particles p, p, e and e in H H secure its c M is prochiral , which explains generically why chirality/left- right asymmetry is so important when complex matter is formed from diatomic bonds (bio-molecules, DNA...). With H, this 2nd order stereo-directing effect can only show in intermolecular HH ("H2") reactions leading to liquid, solid and, eventually, metallic hydrogen. Nature prefers unconventional charge distributions in N=4 neutral positive mass systems, which result in anti- symmetric matter/antimatter interactions in a generic way and, finally, in stable "matter" [3]. More [3,4] or less [1,2] stable micro-scale antimatter-domains exist close to matter- domains. The universe consists mainly of hydrogen. Stable micro-scale "matter" H H gives matter/antimatter symmetry for the universe on the macro-scale [3]. This avoids having to look for large-scale antimatter-domains at large distances (Mpc) from matter-domains [6] to conserve this symmetry. G. Van Hooydonk, Departments of Library Sciences and of Physical & Inorganic Chemistry, Ghent University, Rozier 9, Ghent, Belgium PACs numbers: 31.15 .+q; 36.10.-k; 34.50.+q [1] P. Froelich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett ., 84, 4577 (2000) [2] T. Yamazaki et al., Nature, 361, 238 (1993) [3] G. Van Hooydonk, Spectrochim. Acta A, in press, phys/0001059; Phys. Rev. A, submitted, phys/0003005 [4] E. A. Hylleraas, A. Ore, Phys. Rev., 71, 493 (1947); J .- M. Richard, Phys. Rev. A, 49, 3573 (1994) [5] but see J. Usukura et al., Phys. Rev. A, 58, 1918 (1998) [6] A.G. Cohen et al., Astrophys. J., 495, 539 (1998), astro- ph/9707087; M.Y. Khlopov et al., Phys. Rev. D, in press, hep-ph/0003285

arXiv:physics/0007048v1 [physics.atom-ph] 14 Jul 2000Loading a vapor cell magneto-optic trap using light-induce d atom desorption B.P. Anderson∗and M.A. Kasevich Physics Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8 120 (July 14, 2000) Low intensity white light was used to increase the loading ra te of87Rb atoms into a vapor cell magneto-optic trap by inducing non-thermal desorption of R b atoms from the stainless steel walls of the vapor cell. An increased Rb partial pressure reached a new equilibrium value in less than 10 seconds after switching on the broadband light source. Afte r the source was turned off, the partial pressure returned to its previous value in 1 /etimes as short as 10 seconds. PACS number(s): 32.80.Pj, 42.50.Vk, 68.45.Da I. INTRODUCTION The evaporative cooling techniques used to achieve Bose-Einstein condensation in atomic gases [1–4] rely on loading large numbers of atoms into magnetic traps with long trap lifetimes. The approach originally taken by An- derson et al. [1] was to load Rb atoms into a vapor cell [5] magneto-optic trap (MOT) [6] and to subsequently transfer atoms into a magnetic trap located in the same cell. Large numbers of atoms and long lifetimes were achieved by optimizing the Rb partial pressure and by working with long MOT loading times. We have found a simple way to improve such a setup by modulating the vapor pressure such that it is high for initial trap loading and then low again in order to achieve long lifetimes in a magnetic trap. The technique requires the use of a white light source (WLS) with radiation in- cident upon the inner walls of the vapor cell. When such a light source is turned on, Rb atoms that coat the inner walls of the stainless steel vacuum chamber are quickly desorbed and the Rb vapor pressure suddenly increases. The vapor pressure soon returns to equilibrium after the WLS is turned off. This enables loading large numbers of atoms into the MOT in a relatively short amount of time, while preserving the low pressures required for long mag- netic trap lifetimes. The WLS method that we describe here is a possible alternative to the double-chamber tech- niques [7] and Zeeman slowing techniques [2,3] currently used to capture atoms before evaporatively cooling in a magnetic trap. In our experiments, the WLS method is used in the manner described here for the achievement of BEC in a vapor cell, where the WLS frees us from en- vironmentally induced variations in vapor pressure; for example, regardless of chamber temperature, we can load large numbers of atoms into our MOT and achieve BEC [8]. Light-induced atom desorption (LIAD) has previously been used to obtain optically thick Na and Rb vapors in cells made of glass, pyrex, and sapphire [9,10]. In most of these experiments, the inner walls of the vapor cells were coated with paraffin or silane in order to enhance theLIAD efficiency by reducing the alkali atom adsorption energy [11]. In our work, an optically thick vapor was not required. Since we did not need desorption rates char- acteristic of coated cells, we could desorb atoms directly from stainless steel. II. BACKGROUND We first review the basic mechanisms involved in the operation of a vapor cell MOT, lucidly described in Ref. [5], in order to understand the gains available with the LIAD method. In a vapor cell MOT, atoms are loaded into the MOT at a rate R. This rate depends upon the size and intensity of the laser cooling and trap- ping beams and the Rb partial pressure. Atoms with velocities below a critical velocity will be captured by the trap. Atoms are also lost from the trap due to col- lisions, limiting the number that can be loaded into the MOT. The rate equation for the number, N, of trapped atoms is given by dN dt=R−N/parenleftbigg1 τb+1 τRb/parenrightbigg −β/integraldisplay n2dV, (1) where 1 /τbis the trap loss rate due to collisions with background gas atoms and 1 /τRbis the loss rate deter- mined by collisions with untrapped Rb atoms. The trap density, nin the volume integral, contributes to density- dependent losses within the trap with a loss coefficient ofβ. The loss rate 1 /τbis proportional to the pressure of the background gas, and like R, 1/τRbis proportional to the Rb partial pressure. In the absence of density- dependent collisional losses ( β= 0) [12], and with a Rb partial pressure that is much higher than the background pressure (1 /τRb≫1/τb), the rate equation becomes dN dt=R−N τRb. (2) The limiting number, Nlim, that can be loaded into the MOT is obtained when the increase in number due to 1loading balances the loss due to collisions. At this point, N=NlimanddN/dt = 0, yielding Nlim=RτRb, (3) independent of the Rb partial pressure [5]. Frequently, the background-gas collisions can not be neglected, and the total number reached will be less than Nlim. The maximum number Nmaxthat can be captured for a given Rb partial pressure will then be given by Nmax=NlimτMOT τRb=RτMOT, (4) where 1 τMOT=1 τb+1 τRb. (5) If the trap starts filling at time t= 0, the number of atoms in the MOT at any point in time is given by N(t) =Nmax/bracketleftbigg 1−exp/parenleftbigg −t τMOT/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg . (6) Because of the appearance of τMOTas the time constant in the exponential, we define τMOTas the ”MOT loading time.” The lifetime of a magnetic trap in the same chamber also depends upon the collision rate of trapped atoms with background atoms. Thus the magnetic trap life- timeτis proportional to τMOT. We express this propor- tionality as τ=τMOT/α, where for our traps, α∼4. For evaporative cooling experiments, where large num- bers of atoms and long magnetic trap lifetimes are both necessary, the product of total number Nmaxand mag- netic trap lifetime is the critical parameter to maximize [13]. Because of the relationship between τandτMOT, we can alternatively view this requirement as maximizing the product of NmaxandτMOT. We must therefore find the optimum Rb partial pressure for a given background pressure. Multiplying Eq. 4 by τMOTleads to maximiza- tion of τ2 MOT/τb(Nlimis independent of vapor pressure). Under optimal conditions, with constant Rb partial pres- sure, NmaxτMOTis maximized for τb=τRb=τMOT/2 and hence Nmax=Nlim/2 and NmaxτMOT=Nlimτb/4. However, we can further improve the number-lifetime product (which from now on we will generally designate asNτ) by permitting a modulation of the Rb vapor pres- sure. If the Rb partial pressure is temporarily increased until the trap contains the maximum possible number of atoms ( N=Nmax=Nlim), at which point the Rb vapor is suddenly reduced to a negligible level ( τMOT∼τb), an increase of a factor of 4 in Nτwill be realized. Further- more, the time needed to load the MOT is significantly shortened when τRb≪τbduring the loading interval, increasing the repetition rate of the experiment. The goal of our experiment was to realize gains in Nτ by modulating the Rb vapor pressure in the described manner with the white light source, thus improving con- ditions for evaporative cooling and obtaining BEC.III. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES Our stainless steel vacuum chamber consisted of a va- por cell atom trapping chamber with indium-sealed win- dows, a liquid nitrogen-filled cold finger which protruded into the chamber, and a Rb cold finger at 0◦C, as shown in Fig. 1. The vacuum in the chamber was maintained by a Ti-sublimation pump and an ion pump. We main- tained a Rb vapor in the chamber by slightly opening a valve between the chamber and a Rb cold finger. This replenished Rb that was pumped out of the chamber. valvewindowatom trapping chamberliquid nitrogen cold finger to ion pump Rb cold fingerto Ti-sublimation pump FIG. 1. An illustration of our apparatus. The MOT was formed in the atom trapping chamber, and the WLS light entered into the chamber through a window. The MOT was constructed using a forced dark SPOT technique [13,14]: a 4 mm opaque spot was placed in the center of the path of the repumping laser light, and was imaged onto the region in the chamber where the trap was formed. Another laser beam filled the hole in the re- pumping beam, and was used to optically pump trapped atoms into a dark state. This technique reduced the trap loss rate due to light-assisted, density-dependent colli- sions between trapped atoms. The Rb trapping light was tuned 13 MHz below the 5 S1/2, F= 2→5P3/2, F′= 3 transition, and was provided by six 23 mW/cm2, 1.2 cm diameter laser beams. The 2.7 mW/cm2repumping laser beam was tuned 15 MHz below the F= 1→F′= 2 transition, and the 9 mW/cm2forced optical pumping light was tuned to the F= 2→F′= 2 transition. The number of atoms in the trap was measured by detecting light scattered by the trapped atoms. This was done by turning off the F= 2→F′= 2 light for ∼50 ms and filling the hole in the repumping beam with a separate bypass repumping beam such that the trapped atoms were made bright by scattering light from the trapping beams. A fraction of the light scattered by the trapped atoms was collected and focused onto a calibrated pho- tomultiplier tube. Loading rates ( R) and MOT loading time constants ( τMOT) were measured by detecting the number of atoms at sequential points in time as the trap filled. 2The white light used to enhance trap loading was pro- vided by a fiber optic illuminator, consisting of a halo- gen bulb with variable power and a fiber bundle which pointed the light into the vapor cell. The coupling of the light from the bulb into the fiber gave a maximum inten- sity onto the inner vapor cell wall of ∼10 W/cm2. The WLS was switched on and off electronically. To measure τMOT, we measured the number of atoms loaded into the trap as a function of time both with and without the WLS. The loading curves were exponential in time, as expected for a trap without light-assisted losses. Typical filling curves are shown in Fig. 2(a) for various WLS intensities. In the figure, the curve representing the fastest filling rate, with a WLS intensity of ∼10 W/cm2, shows a loading time constant of τMOT= 67 s and a max- imum number of ∼1.3×108atoms as determined by the exponential fit. Without the WLS, the loading time con- stant was τMOT= 538 s and the maximum number was ∼2×107atoms. Values of number loaded and loading time constants for the curves shown in Fig. 2(a) are given in the second and third columns of Table I .loading rate (10 5 atoms/s) number (10 7 atoms) time (s) 0 200 400 600 0 4 8 12 (a) time (s) 0 50 100 150 200 0 4 8 (b) FIG. 2. (a) Comparison of trap loading with and without the additional external white light source. (b) Trend of the loading rate as a function of time after the WLS is turned off. The lower dashed line shows the loading rate before the WLS was turned on. For both (a) and (b), open triangles represent a WLS intensity of ∼10 W/cm2, closed triangles represent a WLS intensity of ∼5 W/cm2, and the open circles represent a WLS intensity of ∼2 W/cm2. The closed circles in (a) represent loading without the WLS. See Table I for a numerical summary of the data shown in these plots.A key factor to consider in optimizing Nτusing the WLS scheme is the time for the vapor pressure to return to lower equilibrium values once the WLS is switched off. We define this time as the vapor pressure recovery time. A liquid nitrogen cold finger in the main chamber was used to decrease the Rb vapor pressure and shorten the recovery time after the WLS was switched off. In our cell, the cold finger had little effect on the background gas pressure, but shortened the recovery time by a factor of∼2. Furthermore, our experimental timing sequence consisted of a MOT loading phase with the WLS switched on, followed by a MOT holding phase, during which the atoms were held in a MOT with the WLS switched off. This enabled us to keep a large number of atoms trapped while waiting for the vapor pressure to decrease before extinguishing the trapping light. In order to evaluate vapor pressure recovery times, we measured the dependence of loading rates on time just after the WLS was switched off. For the data shown in Fig. 2(b), the WLS was left on until the Rb partial pressure reached a saturated level. The WLS light was then turned off, and the number of atoms loaded into a MOT in 5 seconds was repeatedly measured. After each measurement, the MOT light was kept off for 5 s, and then the MOT started filling again for the subsequent 5 s filling rate measurement. This set of measurements indicated the speed at which τMOTand the Rb vapor pressure could recover after the WLS was turned off, and demonstrated that the recovery time was roughly inde- pendent of the WLS intensity. The fastest loading rate shown with the WLS on was ∼8×105atoms/s, and with the light off was ∼2.7×104atoms/s. Each loading ratevs. time curve in Fig. 2(b) was fit with a sum of two decaying exponential curves. The time constants for the loading rate to return to lower equilibrium values were ∼8 s for the fast recovery time ( τrec,1), and between 113 s and 167 s for the slower recovery time ( τrec,2). Table I contains a list of recovery times. WLS□intensity Nmax τMOT τrec, 1τrec, 2 (W/cm 2) (10 7□atoms) (s) (s) (s) 10 13.3 6.5 6.5 113 5 9.3 120 8.2 167 2 5.2 267 9 162 0 1.9 538 - - TABLE I. Loading and recovery characteristics of the MOT for various WLS strengths. Nmaxindicates the maxi- mum number of atoms that can be loaded into the trap for the corresponding Rb partial pressure. The MOT loading time constant is given by τMOT and the fast recovery time constant is listed as τrec,1. The time τrec,2is the longer time constant in the exponential fits to the data shown in Fig. 2(b) . 3To help evaluate the vapor cell performance, the values forNlimandτbwere estimated by measuring NandτMOT for various Rb partial pressures. Experimentally, we var- ied the Rb partial pressure by adjusting the intensity of the WLS. We estimated τb∼700 s and Nlim= 1.9×108 atoms for our operating parameters by linear extrapola- tion with our data. IV. MODEL We now describe a detailed model for determining the numbers and lifetimes of traps loaded with the WLS to demonstrate the possibility of increasing Nτunder re- alistic experimental conditions. Specifically, this model includes the effects of finite vapor pressure recovery times and finite loading times. Without the use of the WLS, and with long loading times, Nτin a magnetic trap can obtain a maximum optimal value of (Nτ)opt≡Nlimτb/4α (7) withτRb=τb. We will compare the performance of a WLS-loaded MOT to ( Nτ)optto demonstrate the effec- tiveness of a WLS-loaded MOT. For a trap loaded with the WLS, calculating Nτis more complicated. We divide the experimental cycle into three time periods. During the first period, the MOT is loaded, and the WLS remains on for the duration of this period. We call this period the MOT loading phase , which has a duration of time t1. The cycle then enters theMOT holding phase , which has a duration of time t2. In the holding phase, the WLS remains off, allowing the vapor pressure to recover while continuing to hold a large fraction of the trapped atoms in the MOT. In the third period of the cycle, the MOT beams are also turned off and the atoms are trapped in a magnetic trap. This period begins at time tT=t1+t2. Variables for the number of atoms in the trap can be defined at the boundaries of the time periods. At the beginning of the loading phase, N= 0. By the end of the loading phase at time t1,N1atoms are in the MOT. The cycle then enters the holding phase, during which some atoms are lost from the trap due to collisions with other trapped atoms at a rate that is faster than the decreasing loading rate into the trap. We define NWLSto be the number of trapped atoms remaining at the end of this period. The “WLS” subscript emphasizes that this number was obtained using the WLS. The cycle then enters the magnetic trap phase, and NWLSatoms are loaded into the magnetic trap. Because of the continually decreasing vapor pressure (from having used the WLS and then turning it off), the number of atoms in the magnetic trap decays faster than exponentially. Since we desire to maximize the number-lifetime product for the magnetic trap, we define an effective lifetime τWLSas thetime at which the number of atoms in the magnetic trap has reached (1 /e)NWLS. The entire cycle as described is illustrated in Fig. 3. N = NWLS timeN = N1N (arb. units) MOT loading phase WLS onMOT holding phase WLS offMOT off magnetic trap on∆t=t1 ∆t=t2 FIG. 3. The timing sequence used in the experiment and in the calculations. The plot is a representation of the number of trapped atoms as a function of time. The dashed lines separate the different stages of trap loading and holding. Th e number of trapped atoms at the end of the MOT loading and holding phases is given above the Nvs. time curve. The states of the MOT and the WLS are also listed for the time intervals t1andt2. After the MOT holding phase, at time tT=t1+t2, NWLSatoms are assumed to be loaded from the MOT into a magnetic trap. Our intent in this analysis is to compare NWLSτWLS with both Nτfor unmodulated Rb pressures at vary- ing loading times and with ( Nτ)opt, as defined in Eq. 7. First, we calculate the number of atoms N1in the MOT att1. At the beginning of the MOT loading phase, the WLS is turned on, and the loading time constant asso- ciated with the Rb partial pressure quickly drops to a value of τ1. We thus obtain N1=Nlim 1 +τ1/τb[1−exp(−t1[1/τ1+ 1/τb])] (8) from the use of Eqs. 6 and 4. The trapped atoms then enter the holding phase. The WLS is turned off, and the number of atoms in the MOT is governed by the rate equation dN/dt =R(t)− N/τ2(t)−N/τb, where τ2is the loading time constant as- sociated with the decaying Rb vapor pressure. The time dependence of Randτ2is made explicit, since these val- ues depend upon the decreasing Rb vapor pressure. The loading rate R(t) and the loss rate 1 /τ2(t) are assumed to decay exponentially (with a time constant of the va- por pressure recovery time) to the steady-state values R(t)→0 and 1 /τ2→0 (negligible Rb vapor pressures) as the vapor pressure recovers. The rate equation is nu- merically integrated to determine the number of atoms, NWLS, left in the MOT at time tT, the point at which the MOT is turned off. We finally must determine the effective lifetime τWLSof the magnetic trapping phase of the cycle by numerically 4solving the rate equation dN/dt =−α(N/τ3(t)−N/τb). Here, 1 /τ3(t) has an initial value of 1 /τ2(t2) and de- cays exponentially in time to 0 as the vapor pressure continues to recover. Finally, we can write the number- lifetime product of the WLS-loaded MOT, designated by (Nτ)WLS, as (Nτ)WLS=NWLSτWLS. V. RESULTS We numerically investigated the performance of the MOT loaded with the WLS by comparing ( Nτ)WLSwith Nτfor unmodulated pressures (Fig. 4). Figure 4(a) shows the number-lifetime product due to trapping atoms in a MOT for a time tT=τbas a function of the frac- tion of the loading cycle that the WLS is used. We assume that Nmax=Nlim/2 for unmodulated partial pressures, and an arbitrarily chosen value of Nmax= Nlim/(1 +τ1/τb) = (0 .9)Nlim(see Eq. 8), or equivalently τ1= (0.1)τb, for the modulated partial pressures. Here, the chosen value of Nmaxcan not be set to Nlimdue to limitations in the numerical calculations. Fig. 4(b) shows the same conditions as Fig. 4(a), but here we have plotted the ratio of ( Nτ)WLStoNτwith unmodulated pressures after a total MOT trapping time of tT. As suggested by Fig. 4, the optimum time to leave on the WLS is determined by the maximum point on a given curve. In the calculations, the gain in Nτafter using the WLS is less than the maximum possible value of 4 due to the need to allow the vapor pressure to recover before loading the atoms into a magnetic trap. The highest values that can be achieved for Nτwith and without the WLS are plotted against total loading time tTin Fig. 5 for the same conditions as in Fig. 4. The gain in using the WLS is again less than the ideal maximum factor of 4 for long loading times. However, for short loading times, Nτ for unmodulated pressures is much lower than ( Nτ)optas shown by the gray curve in Fig. 5(a). Modulated vapor pressures can give substantial benefits in this regime, as shown by the larger Nτratios in Fig. 5(b). As a concrete example of reading the plots given here, we assume that we have a system that has a vapor pres- sure recovery time of 0 .035τb. Thus we are interested in the uppermost curves in Figs. 4(a-d) and 5(a,b). If we load the vapor cell MOT without modulating the Rb partial pressure, we can achieve a value of Nτ∼1 (in units of ( Nτ)opt≡Nlimτb/4α) after loading the trap for a total time of tT= 2τb, as shown in the lower (gray) curve of Fig. 5(a). However, if we modulate the Rb pres- sure with the WLS, we can triple the value of Nτfor the same total MOT trapping time. To determine the proper time to remove the WLS light, Fig. 4(c) indicates beginning the MOT holding phase 0 .12τbbefore loading the magnetic trap (thus t1= 1.88τb) for optimum trap loading.t1/tT024(a) 0 0.5 1024(b)Nτ ratio t1/tTNτ ratio(c) 024 0 0.5024 1(d) (Nτ)WLS/(Nτ)opt (Nτ)WLS/(Nτ)opt FIG. 4. (a) The calculated products ( Nτ)WLSin units of (Nτ)opt≡Nlimτb/4α, the maximum value that can be achieved with unmodulated vapor pressures, after a total MOT trapping time of tT=τb. The Rb-limited lifetime is assumed to quickly decrease to τ1=τb/10 when the WLS is turned on. The curves show ( Nτ)WLSat varying times t1 (as a fraction of tT), the point in the MOT loading cycle at which the WLS is turned off, with the remaining time in the cycle ( tT−t1) permitting recovery of the Rb partial pressure with a time constant of 0 .035τb(black line), 0 .05τb(dotted), 0.1τb(short dashed), 0 .15τb(dashed-dotted), and 0 .2τb(long dashed). Nτfor unmodulated vapor pressure is shown as a solid gray line, after a loading time of τT=τb. (Note that for this value to equal ( Nτ)opt, an infinite loading time would be needed.) (b) The ratios of the upper curves in (a) to the value ofNτfor unmodulated vapor pressure after a MOT trapping time of τT=τb. (c,d) Same as for (a) and (b), with a total loading time of tT= 2τb. Graphs (c) and (d) look nearly iden- tical because Nτfor unmodulated partial pressures is nearly equal to ( Nτ)optafter loading for tT= 2τb. The four graphs (a)-(d) shown in this figure demonstrate that for a given re- covery time and MOT trapping time ( tT), there is an optimal WLS duration ( t1) the maximum point on the plotted curves. 5Alternatively, we can shorten the loading time tTto ∼0.5τb, as demonstrated in Fig. 5(a), and maintain the same gain in Nτ. In doing so, we would not only gain a factor of 3 in Nτ, but we would also increase the repeti- tion rate of the experiment by as much as a factor of 4. If instead we load the experiment for a fixed amount of time in either case (with or without the WLS), we should look at Fig. 5(b) to compare the Nτproducts. For a total MOT trapping time of tT= 0.4τb, we would achieve over a five-fold gain in Nτby modulating the vapor pressure with the WLS. Nτ ratio 0246(b) 0 1 201234 tT/τb(a)(Nτ)WLS/(Nτ)opt FIG. 5. (a) Values of ( Nτ)WLSfor WLS loading as a func- tion of tT(as a fraction of τb). The limiting number of atoms that can possibly be loaded into the WLS trap is assumed to be (0.9)Nlim(top curves), or equivalently τ1=τb/10 when the WLS is turned on. The curves represent recovery times 0.035τb(black line), 0 .05τb(dotted), 0 .1τb(short dashed), 0.15τb(dashed-dotted), and 0 .2τb(long dashed). The vari- ation of non-WLS number-lifetime product with time (solid gray line) is shown. The calculations assume that for any par - ticular value of tT, the WLS is turned off at the optimal t1 (see Fig. 4). The vertical axis is scaled to ( Nτ)opt. (b) The ratios of the upper curves in (a) to the value of Nτfor un- modulated vapor pressure at any given total MOT trapping timetT. Experimentally, we were able to obtain an Nτprod- uct of ( Nτ)WLS= 5.0×109atoms·s using the WLS technique, achieved with a MOT loading phase of du- ration t1= 100 s and a MOT holding phase of duration t2= 50 s. This value of ( Nτ)WLSis 2.2 times larger than ( Nτ)opt= 2.3×109atoms·s, 95% of the maxi- mum value of ( Nτ)optfor optimized Rb partial pressure,reached with a loading time of 3 τb= 466 s. Without the WLS, the Rb partial pressure was optimized when τMOT=τRb/2 =τb/2 and N=Nlim/2. This number of Nτis inferred from measurements of Nlimandτbmen- tioned previously. Note that in addition to the gain in Nτ, the time to reach the above value of ( Nτ)WLSis 3.1 times faster than the time to reach the above value of ( Nτ)opt(without the WLS), tripling the repetition rate of experiments. The WLS experimental technique would be even more benefi- cial by shortening the recovery time of the vapor pressure. This might be accomplished by keeping a larger fraction of the inner surface of the vapor cell at cryogenic temper- atures or through optimization of the surface adsorption chemistry. VI. CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY The use of LIAD to enhance loading of vapor cell MOTs may be applicable to other atomic species. Lithium vapor cells, for instance, are difficult to work with due to the high temperatures needed to create a substantial Li vapor. Yet if LIAD were to work well with Li adsorbed on stainless steel, or between co-adsorbed Li atoms on a surface, a Li vapor cell MOT would be practical. Although the effect has not yet been quantita- tively explored as it has been for Rb, we observed a LIAD induced increase in the loading rate into a Cs MOT in a Cs vapor cell with aluminum walls. In general, when first using the LIAD technique, the WLS intensity should be raised incrementally to monitor the loading time con- stant. When the WLS loading time constant becomes too short ( <10 s) the vapor pressure can potentially be- come high enough that atoms may re-adsorb onto cold chamber windows and may possibly form small clusters of atoms. In summary, we have demonstrated that the technique of non-thermal light induced atom desorption can be used to effectively increase the number of atoms that can be loaded into a vapor cell MOT. This technique benefits atom trapping experiments where large numbers of atoms and long trap lifetimes are crucial. ∗Current address: JILA, Campus Box 440, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0440. [1] M.H. Anderson, J.R. Ensher, M.R. Matthews, C.E. Wie- man, E.A. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995). [2] K.B. Davis, M.-O. Mewes, M.R. Andrews, N.J. van Druten, D.S. Durfee, D.M. Kurn, W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995). 6[3] C.C. Bradley, C.A. Sackett, J.J. Tollett, R.G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1687 (1995); C.C. Bradley, C.A. Sackett, R.G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 985 (1997). [4] D.G. Fried, T.C. Killian, L. Willmann, D. Landhuis, S.C. Moss, D. Kleppner, T.J. Greytak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3811 (1998). [5] C. Monroe, W. Swann, H. Robinson, C. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1571 (1990). [6] E.L. Raab, M. Prentiss, A. Cable, S. Chu, D.E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2631 (1987); also seeJ. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, No. 11 (1989). [7] C.J. Myatt, N.R. Newbury, R.W. Ghrist, S. Loutzen- heiser, C.E. Wieman, Opt. Lett. 21, 290 (1996). [8] B.P. Anderson and M.A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. A 59, R938 (1999). [9] A.M. Bonch-Bruevich, T.A. Vartanyan, Yu.M. Maksi- mov, S.G. Przhibel’ski ˘i, V.V. Khromov, Sov. Phys. JETP 70, 993 (1990). [10] M. Meucci, E. Mariotti, P. Bicchi, C. Marinelli, L. Moi, Europhys. Lett. 25, 639 (1994). See also J. Xu, M. Alle- grini, S. Gozzini, E. Mariotti, L. Moi, Opt. Comm. 63, 43 (1987); and E. Mariotti, S. Atutov, M. Meucci, P. Bicchi, C. Marinelli, L. Moi, Chem. Phys. 187, 111 (1994). [11] For a general discussion of adsorption and desorption, see Morrison, S. Roy, The Chemical Physics of Surfaces , sec- ond edition (Plenum Press) 1990; and R. Masel, Princi- ples of Adsorption and Reaction on Solid Surfaces (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) 1996. [12] T.G. Walker and P. Feng, Advances in Atomic, Molecu- lar, and Optical Physics 34, 125 (1994). [13] M.H. Anderson, W. Petrich, J.R. Ensher, E.A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. A 50, R3597 (1994). [14] W. Ketterle, K.B. Davis, M.A. Joffe, A. Martin, D.E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2253 (1993). 7

arXiv:physics/0007049v1 [physics.atom-ph] 14 Jul 2000Limit on Lorentz and CPT Violation of the Neutron Using a Two-Species Noble-Gas Maser D. Bear, R.E. Stoner, and R.L. Walsworth Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138 V. Alan Kosteleck´ y and Charles D. Lane Physics Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 4 7405 (July 14, 2000) A search for sidereal variations in the frequency difference between co-located129Xe and3He Zeeman masers sets the most stringent limit to date on leadin g-order Lorentz and CPT violation involving the neutron, consistent with no effect at the level of 10−31GeV. Lorentz symmetry is a fundamental feature of modern descriptions of nature, including both the standard model of particle physics and general relativity. However, these realistic theories are believed to be the low-energy limit of a single fundamental theory at the Planck scale. Even if the underlying theory is Lorentz invariant, spontaneous symmetry breaking might result in small apparent vio- lations of Lorentz invariance at an observable level. Ex- perimental investigations of the validity of Lorentz sym- metry therefore provide valuable tests of the framework of modern theoretical physics. Clock-comparison experiments [1–6] serve as sensitive probes of rotation invariance and hence of Lorentz sym- metry, essentially by bounding the frequency variation of a clock as its orientation changes. In practice, the most precise limits are obtained by comparing the frequencies of two different co-located clocks as they rotate with the Earth. Typically, the clocks are electromagnetic signals emitted or absorbed on hyperfine or Zeeman transitions. Here, we report on a search for sidereal variations in the frequency of co-located129Xe and3He masers, both operating on nuclear spin-1 /2 Zeeman transitions. In the context of a general standard-model extension allowing for the possibility of Lorentz and CPT violation [7,8], the129Xe/3He-maser experiment sets the most stringent limit to date on leading order Lorentz and CPT violation of the neutron: about 10−31GeV, or more than six times better than the best previous measurements [9]. The standard-model extension motivating this experi- ment emerges from any underlying theory that generates the standard model and contains spontaneous Lorentz vi- olation [10]. For example, this might occur in string the- ory [11]. The standard-model extension maintains theo- retically desirable properties of the usual standard model [8]. Its formulation at the level of the known elementary particles is a key feature enabling quantitative compari- son of a wide array of tests of Lorentz and CPT symme- try. In this context, theoretical studies have been per- formed to investigate the sensitivity of clock-comparison experiments [9], tests of QED in Penning traps [12], ex- periments with a spin-polarized torsion pendulum [13], hydrogen-antihydrogen spectroscopy [14], studies of pho- ton birefringence in the vacuum [15,8,16], observations ofmuons [17], measurements of neutral-meson oscillations [7,18], studies of the baryon asymmetry [19], and obser- vations of cosmic rays [20]. In the context of the standard-model extension, the most sensitive prior clock-comparison experiment is the 199Hg/133Cs comparison of Hunter, Lamoreaux et al. [6,9]. Recent experimental work motivated by the standard-model extension includes Penning trap tests by Gabrielse et al. on the antiproton and the H−ion [21] and by Dehmelt et al. on the electron and positron [22,23]. A reanalysis by Adelberger, Gundlach, Heckel, and co-workers of existing data from a spin-polarized tor- sion pendulum experiment [24,25] sets the most strin- gent bound to date on Lorentz and CPT violation of the electron, at about 10−28GeV [26]. A recent Lorentz- symmetry test using hydrogen masers has searched for Zeeman-frequency sidereal variations, placing a bound on Lorentz violation at the level of 10−27GeV [27]. To- gether with the results of Ref. [26], this implies an im- proved clean limit of 10−27GeV on Lorentz-violating cou- plings involving the proton. Also, the KTeV experiment at Fermilab and the OPAL and DELPHI collaborations at CERN have constrained possible Lorentz- and CPT- violating effects in the KandBdsystems [28,29]. The standard-model extension predicts that the leading-order Lorentz- and CPT-violating correction to the3He-maser frequency, using the129Xe maser as a co- magnetometer, is [9]: 2π|δνJ|=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle−3.5˜bn J+ 0.012˜dn J+ 0.012˜gn J/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle. (1) Here, ˜bn J,˜dn J, and ˜ gn Jare small parameters characterizing the strength of Lorentz-violating couplings of the neu- tron to possible background tensor fields that may arise from spontaneous symmetry breaking in a fundamental theory. The couplings associated with ˜bn Jand ˜gn Jalso vi- olate CPT. All three parameters are linear combinations of more basic quantities in the underlying relativistic La- grangian of the standard-model extension [9]. In the analysis leading to Eq. (1), the Lorentz-violating coupling of either the3He or129Xe nucleus has been taken as that of a single1S1/2valence neutron in a Schmidt model [9]. The parameters appearing in Eq. 1(1) are therefore associated only with neutron couplings, as indicated by the superscript non˜bn J,˜dn J, ˜gn J. Equation (1) also assumes that the applied magnetic field, which sets the quantization axis of the experiment, is directed east-west in the Earth’s reference frame. The subscript J=X, Yindicates components in the sidereal reference frame that are orthogonal to the Earth’s axis of rotation. The design and operation of the two-species129Xe/3He maser has been discussed in recent publications [30,31]. Here, we give a brief review. The two-species maser con- tains dense co-located ensembles of3He and129Xe atoms. Each ensemble performs an active maser oscillation on its nuclear spin-1 /2 Zeeman transition at approximately 4.9 kHz for3He and 1.7 kHz for129Xe in a static mag- netic field of 1.5 gauss. This two-species maser operation can be maintained indefinitely. The population inver- sions for the two maser ensembles are created by spin- exchange collisions between the noble-gas atoms and op- tically pumped Rb vapor [32,33]. The129Xe/3He maser has two glass chambers, one acting as the spin exchange “pump bulb” and the other serving as the “maser bulb.” This two chamber configuration permits the combination of physical conditions necessary for a high flux of spin- polarized noble gas atoms into the maser bulb, while also maintaining3He- and129Xe-maser oscillations with good frequency stability: stability of about 100 nHz is typical for measurement intervals larger than about an hour [31]. Either noble-gas species can serve as a precision magne- tometer to stabilize the system’s static magnetic field, while the other species is employed as a sensitive probe for Lorentz- and CPT-violating interactions. We used the129Xe/3He maser to search for a Lorentz- violation signature by monitoring the relative phases and Larmor frequencies of the co-located3He and129Xe masers as the laboratory reference frame rotated with re- spect to the fixed stars. The system was operated with the129Xe maser as the co-magnetometer, the3He maser free-running, and the quantization axis directed east- west in the Earth’s reference frame. To leading order, the standard-model extension predicts that the Lorentz- violating frequency shifts for the3He and129Xe maser are the same size and sign. Hence, the resultant side- real variation of the3He maser frequency observed in the laboratory frame takes the form δνHe=δνXcos(Ω st) +δνYsin(Ω st), (2) where Ω sis the angular frequency of the sidereal day [34], and the parameters δνJgiven by Eq. (1) represent the net effect of the Lorentz- and CPT-violating couplings on the3He maser frequency with the129Xe maser act- ing as a co-magnetometer. The time twas measured in seconds from the beginning of the sidereal day in Cam- bridge, Massachusetts (longitude −71.11◦). Data collection and analysis were performed as fol- lows. The129Xe- and3He-maser signals from an induc- tive pickup coil were buffered, amplified, and sent to apair of digital lock-in detectors. Typical raw-signal lev- els were about 3 to 5 µV. All reference signals used in the experiment were derived from the same hydrogen- maser clock, thus eliminating concerns about unmeasur- able electronic phase shifts between the reference oscil- lators. The hydrogen maser operated on the standard hyperfine clock transition, and thus had no leading-order sensitivity to Lorentz and CPT violation [9,14]. Active feedback to the solenoid’s magnetic field locked the phase of the129Xe maser to that of a 1.7 kHz reference signal, and thereby isolated the experiment from common-mode systematic effects (such as stray magnetic field fluctua- tions) that would otherwise shift the frequencies of the noble-gas masers in proportion to the ratio of their mag- netic moments. When phase locked, the short- and long- term frequency stability [31] of the129Xe maser was sev- eral orders of magnitude better than that of the free- running3He maser, so the129Xe Zeeman frequency was treated as constant in the data analysis. The phase and amplitude of both maser signals were recorded at four-second intervals by the lock-in ampli- fiers and downloaded for analysis every 23.93 hours. A one-sidereal day run thus contained approximately 21,540 evenly spaced measurements of the relative phases of the two masers. The values of the two coefficients δνX, δνYwere computed, providing a measure of poten- tial Lorentz-violation for that day’s run. Seven additiona l diagnostic signals were recorded, including the temper- atures of the pump bulb, maser bulb, and external res- onator; an optical monitor of the Rb magnetization in the pump bulb; the broadband power emitted by the optical- pumping laser-diode array; the ambient room tempera- ture; and the east-west component of the ambient mag- netic field. Control loops stabilized the system tempera- tures to about 10 mK. Two additional control loops were used, feeding back to the optical-pumping laser to reduce systematic effects arising from variations in the density and polarization of Rb in the pump bulb [35]. Small noble-gas polarization-induced frequency shifts were the dominant source of instability (i.e., phase drift) in the free-running3He maser. For a typical one-day run, the linear-correlation coefficient between3He phase data and the integrated amplitude of either maser was in the range 0.95 - 0.99. We admitted terms to our data- analysis model to account for this polarization-induced phase drift. The effect of potential Lorentz-violating cou- plings on the evolution of the3He phase was expressed in terms of the coefficients δνJvia integration of Eq. (2), and initial reduction of each one-day run was performed using the minimal fit model δφHe=φ0+ 2πν0t +2πΩ−1 s[δνXsin(Ω st)−δνYcos(Ω st)],(3) where the coefficients φ0andν0account for absolute phase and frequency offsets between the3He maser and 2the ultra-stable reference oscillator. The reduced χ2 statistic for this fit model was determined, and then additional terms corresponding to quadratic and maser amplitude-correlated phase drift were incorporated into the model if they significantly improved the reduced χ2 [36]. The coefficients δνXandδνYfor each one-day run were extracted using a linear least-squares routine on the best-fitting model for that day, which contained at most seven free parameters and thus at least (21500 −7) de- grees of freedom. See Fig. 1 for an example of the residu- als from one day’s data. As a final check, a faux Lorentz- violating effect of known phase and amplitude was added to the raw data and the analysis was repeated. Data re- duction for a given sidereal day was considered successful if the synthetic physics was recovered and there was no change in the covariance matrix generated by the fitting routine. 40x10-3 20 0 -20 -403He phase residuals (rad) 20151050 hours FIG. 1. Typical residuals for the3He phase data from one sidereal day, calculated using the fit model given in Eq. (3). Data for this experiment were acquired with three dif- ferent maser cells over a period of 30 days in April 1999 (cell S3), 24 days in September 1999 (cell E9), and 60 days in February-May 2000 (cell SE3, runs 1 and 2). A total of 90 usable sidereal-day values of δνX,δνYwere obtained. The main magnetic field of the apparatus was reversed about every 10 days to help distinguish possible Lorentz-violating effects from diurnal systematic varia- tions. Field reversal and subsequent re-equilibration of the masers required approximately 24 hours. Systematic effects resulting from possible diurnally varying ambient magnetic fields would not average away with field reversals. Thus, the effectiveness of the129Xe co-magnetometer at eliminating such effects was care- fully assessed before beginning data acquisition. Since the two maser ensembles do not have perfect spatial overlap, penetration of external magnetic fields through the nested magnetic shields and into the interaction re- gion could induce small frequency shifts in the free- running3He maser despite the presence of the129Xe co- magnetometer. Large coils ( ∼2.4 m diameter) surround- ing the129Xe/3He-maser apparatus were used to switch on and off 0.5 G external magnetic fields in the north-south and east-west directions. A bound on the ratio |δνHe/δBexternal |was obtained. The drifts in the ambi- ent magnetic field near the apparatus were measured to be about 0.2 mG over a typical 24-hour period, result- ing in a worst-case shift on the free-running3He maser of less than 8 nHz, well below the present sensitivity of the experiment to Lorentz and CPT violation. It should be noted that the relative phase between the solar and sidereal day evolved about 2 πradians over the course of the experiment (April 1999 to May 2000). Hence, diur- nal systematic effects from any source would tend to be reduced by averaging results from all measurement sets. The measured values of δνJexhibited a small depen- dence on the direction of the solenoidal magnetic field in the laboratory frame. This dependence was most likely due to hysteresis and asymmetry in magnetic interactions between the solenoid and the nested µ-metal shields un- der field reversal. For each cell, the data for the east and west magnetic-field orientations were analyzed sepa- rately to determine mean values and standard errors for δνJ, yielding the results in Table 1. As an example, Fig. 2 shows the single-day values of δνXobtained in the first run with cell SE3 in the east field orientation (SE3 E1). Cell δνX(nHz) δνY(nHz) S3 E 95 ±118 197 ±114 S3 W −43±138 88 ±148 E9 E −86±234 −194±207 E9 W −206±186 −60±134 SE3 E1 100 ±148 9 ±141 SE3 W1 −1±88 62 ±109 SE3 E2 −2±180 68 ±107 SE3 W2 −35±118 197 ±120 Table 1: Means and standard errors for δνXandδνY. Re- sults are displayed for each of the three cells (S3, E9, and SE 3) with both east (E) and west (W) orientations of the magnetic field. Two runs were performed for cell SE3. -2000-1000010002000δνX (nHz) 15 10 5 0 run number FIG. 2. Values of the Lorentz-violating parameter δνXob- tained with cell SE3 in the E1 orientation. The horizontal line indicates the mean value for that data set. The total weighted means and uncertainties for δνX andδνYwere then formed from all data sets. Finally, the results were used to extract the measured value of R≡/radicalbig δν2 X+δν2 Y, giving 53 ±45 nHz (1- σlevel). The size of the coefficients in Eq. (1) indicates that 3the129Xe/3He-maser experiment is most sensitive to the Lorentz- and CPT-violating coupling associated with ˜bn J. Under the assumption of negligible ˜dn Jand ˜gn J[9], the above experimental result for Rcorresponds to a value for ˜bn ⊥≡/radicalBig (˜bn X)2+ (˜bn Y)2= (4.0±3.3)×10−31GeV. This re- sult is consistent with no Lorentz- and CPT-violating ef- fect, given reasonable assumptions about the probability distribution for R[37]. It represents the most stringent limit to date on possible Lorentz- and CPT-violating cou- plings involving the neutron and is more than six times better than the best previous measurements [9]. We are planning improved Lorentz and CPT tests us- ing noble-gas masers. Upgrading laser and temperature control and acquiring a larger data set could better the present Lorentz and CPT constraint from the129Xe/3He system by up to an order of magnitude. Also, a new two- species Zeeman maser using3He and21Ne might provide even greater improvements to constraints on neutron pa- rameters [9,38]. David Phillips, Mark Rosenberry, Federico Can´ e, Tim- othy Chupp, Robert Vessot and Edward Mattison helped greatly with this project. Development of the129Xe/3He Zeeman maser was supported by a NIST Precision Mea- surement Grant. Support for the Lorentz-violation test was provided by NASA grant NAG8-1434, ONR grant N00014-99-1-0501, and the Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Studies Program. This work was supported in part by the DOE under grant DE-FG02-91ER40661. [1] V.W. Hughes, H.G. Robinson, and V. Beltran-Lopez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 342 (1960). [2] R.W.P. Drever, Philos. Mag. 6, 683 (1961). [3] J.D. Prestage et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2387 (1985). [4] S.K. Lamoreaux et al., Phys. Rev. A 39, 1082 (1989). [5] T.E. Chupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1541 (1989). [6] C.J. Berglund et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 10, 1879 (1995); L.R. Hunter et al., in V.A. Kosteleck´ y, ed., CPT and Lorentz Symmetry , World Scientific, Singapore, 1999. [7] V.A. Kosteleck´ y and R. Potting, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3923 (1995); and in D.B. Cline, ed., Gamma Ray–Neutrino Cosmology and Planck Scale Physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 1993 (hep-th/9211116). [8] D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997); Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998). [9] V.A. Kosteleck´ y and C.D. Lane, Phys. Rev. D 60, 116010 (1999); J. Math. Phys. 40, 6425 (1999). [10] V.A. Kosteleck´ y and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 224 (1989); Phys. Rev. D 40, 1886 (1989); Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1811 (1991). [11] V.A. Kosteleck´ y and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989); V.A. Kosteleck´ y and R. Potting, Nucl. Phys. B359 , 545 (1991); Phys. Lett. B 381, 89 (1996); V.A.Kosteleck´ y, R. Potting, and M. Perry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4541 (2000). [12] R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1432 (1997); Phys. Rev. D 57, 3932 (1998). [13] R. Bluhm and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1381 (2000). [14] R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2254 (1999). [15] S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990). [16] R. Jackiw and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572 (1999). See also M. P´ erez-Victoria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2518 (1999); J.M. Chung, Phys. Lett. B 461, 138 (1999). [17] R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y and C.D. Lane, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1098 (2000). [18] D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Lett. B 344, 259 (1995); Phys. Rev. D 52, 6224 (1995); V.A. Kosteleck´ y and R. Van Kooten, Phys. Rev. D 545585 (1996); V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 801818 (1998); Phys. Rev. D61, 16002 (2000). [19] O. Bertolami et al., Phys. Lett. B 395, 178 (1997). [20] S. Coleman and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 56, 116008 (1999). [21] G. Gabrielse et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3198 (1999). [22] R.K. Mittleman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2116 (1999). [23] H.G. Dehmelt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4694 (1999). [24] E.G. Adelberger et al., in P. Herczeg et al., eds.Physics Beyond the Standard Model , World Scientific, Singapore, 1999. [25] M.G. Harris, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Washington, 1998. [26] B. Heckel, presented at the International Conference o n Orbis Scientiae 1999, Fort Launderdale, Florida, Decem- ber 1999. [27] D.F. Phillips et al., submitted for publication. [28] KTeV Collaboration, presented by Y.B. Hsiung at the KAON 99 conference, Chicago, June 1999. [29] OPAL Collaboration, R. Ackerstaff et al., Z. Phys. C 76, 401 (1997); DELPHI Collaboration, M. Feindt et al., preprint DELPHI 97-98 CONF 80 (July 1997). [30] R.E. Stoner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3971 (1996). [31] D. Bear et al., Phys. Rev. A 57, 6 (1998). [32] T.E. Chupp et al., Phys. Rev. A 38, 3998 (1988). [33] G.D. Cates et al., Phys. Rev. A 45, 4631 (1992). [34] One sidereal day is approximately one solar day scaled by (1−1/364.24), or about 23.93 hours. [35] D.F. Phillips et al., Rev. Sci. Inst. 70, 2905 (1999). [36] We employed the F-test at the 99% confidence level to de- cide whether the addition of a new term to the fit model was justified. See P.R. Bevington, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1992. [37] The probability distribution for Ris formed by multi- plying the distributions for δνXandδνY, converting to polar coordinates, and integrating over the polar angle. In the case where δνXandδνYhave zero mean value and the same variance σ, the probablity distribution takes the formP(R) =σ−2Rexp(−r2/2σ2), with the most proba- ble value of R occurring at R=σ. [38] R.E. Stoner, in V.A. Kosteleck´ y, ed., CPT and Lorentz Symmetry , World Scientific, Singapore, 1999. 4

arXiv:physics/0007050v1 [physics.bio-ph] 15 Jul 2000Clustering and Signalling of Cooperative Receptors: a Unifi ed Model Yu Shi∗and Thomas Duke Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom Abstract We present a model of cooperativity between transmembrane r eceptors. Two responses to ligand binding, receptor signalling and the en hancement of clus- tering, or oligomerization, are unified in the same framewor k. The model is based on a conformation-dependent interaction between n eighboring re- ceptors. In order to decrease the total energy of the system, neighboring receptors tend to have a same conformational state, while re ceptors with the same conformational state tend to cluster together. In the p resence of noise, there is a probability distribution of various configuratio ns of the system. This situation is treated using analytical and numerical me thods of statis- tical mechanics. Signalling sensitivity is enhanced by an a ppropriate choice of coupling-noise-ratio. There is a range of the threshold v alue of receptor conformational change for which clustering is enhanced by l igand binding. Keywords: Oligomerization, conformational state, cooper ativity, receptor- receptor interaction, sensitivity, statistical mechanic s Typeset using REVT EX ∗Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: y s219@phy.cam.ac.uk 1INTRODUCTION On the surface of a cell, there are many transmembrane recept ors. In the presence of certain extracellular ligands which bind to the receptor s, receptor signalling causes a cascade of responses in the cell. An additional ubiquitous p henomenon is that ligand binding enhances clustering, or oligomerization, of the receptors . The purpose of this paper is to present a universal framework which combines these two aspe cts, by constructing a general model using statistical mechanics. Investigations of oligomerization are widely reported for a variety of receptors. Among others, just to give a few examples (Lemmon and Schlessinger , 1994; Heldin, 1995; Lemmon et al., 1997; Germain, 1997; Reich et al., 1997 Ashkenazi and Dixit, 1998; Giancotti and Ruoslahti 1999; Gilboa et al., 2000; Shultz et al., 2000): integins, which attach cells to the extracellular matrix, tyrosine kinase (TRK) receptors, cy toskine receptors, growth factor re- ceptors, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors, including death receptors, antigen receptors such as T-cell receptors, bone morphogenetic protein recep tor, G-protein-coupled receptors, etc. Therefore, the response of receptors to ligand binding ofte n comprises two processes. One is the signalling through conformational changes, whic h is very sensitive. Another is the clustering. In the case of bacterial chemotaxis, thousa nds of receptors cluster together at a pole of the cell, hinting that the clustered nature of the re ceptor may be related to the sen- sitivity of signalling (Parkinson and Blair, 1993; Bray et al., 1998). Recently a cooperative model was constructed for the signalling of an a priori cluster of receptors (Shi and Duke, 1998). This model provides a good explanation for the chemot actic signalling sensitivity, and gives results in good agreement with a recent experiment (Ja sujaet al., 1999). Numerical simulation (Duke and Bray, 1999) based on this model (Shi and Duke, 1998) demonstrated that sensitivity could be maintained over a wide range of amb ient concentration. Investiga- tions on the adaptation process led to a so-called adaptive I sing model which preserves the signalling sensitivity by negative feedback (Shi, 2000). O n the other hand, Guo and Levine 2studied the clustering of receptors as a consequence of rece ptor-receptor interaction, based on the assumption that the interaction between neighbors de pends on whether the receptors areliganded (Guo and Levine, 1999), while the signalling problem was not considered. We think that it is more likely that the interaction depends on t he activities, i.e. the confor- mational states of the receptors. In addition to the reasons given previousl y (Shi and Duke, 1998; Shi 2000), this is also supported by the strong experim ental evidence that oligomer- ization is stabilized by receptor-receptor interaction pr omoted by conformational changes of the receptors (Lemmon and Schlessinger, 1994; Heldin, 19 95; Lemmon et al., 1997; Ger- main, 1997; Gilboa et al., 2000; Shultz et al., 2000). By extending our previous model to the case in which receptors diffuse on the membrane, we propos e that signalling sensitivity and oligomerization are two consequences of the same mechan ism based on conformation - dependent receptor-receptor interaction. As a consequenc e, the conformational state of a receptor is influenced not only by the ligand bound to itself, but also by ligands bound to other receptors in its immediate vicinity. THE MODEL Consider a collection of receptors on a lattice (see Fig. 1 fo r two configurations). Let the coordinate number be ν, which is 6 for a honeycomb lattice and is 4 for a square lattic e. Suppose that the receptors can move around on the lattice. Th erefore at an instant, a receptor may have less than νnearest-neighboring receptors. The conformational state of the receptor at lattice point iis represented as Vi, the value of which is either V0orV1.Vi is decided by whether this receptor is liganded or not, as wel l as the conformational states of its nearest-neighboring receptors. We use Hito represent whether there is a ligand binding, that is,Hi=Hif the receptor is ligand bound, otherwise Hi= 0. Thus given the ligand concentration [ L], eachHiis randomly distributed between H, with probability c, and 0, with probability 1 −c, i.e. the probability distribution is p(Hi) =cδ(Hi−H) + (1 −c)δ(Hi), (1) 3wherecis the occupancy, i.e. the fraction of liganded receptors. c= [L]/([L] +Kd), where Kdis the dissociation constant. We associate each site iwith a variable ni, which is 1 if there is a receptor on this site, and is 0 otherwise. In realit y, of course ViandHiare only defined when there is a receptor on site i. But because the presence or not of a receptor at siteihas been decided by ni, for the convenience of treatment, equivalently we may attach ViandHito each site i, no matter whether there is a receptor on site i. Since the receptors are allowed to diffuse, {ni}depend on time, with the constraint that the sum of ni, i.e. the total number of receptors, is conserved. Therefore, in the noiseless case, i.e. zero temperature, we have Vi=ψ(/summationdisplay jTijnjVj+Hi−Ui),withψ(x) =  V1ifx>0 V0ifx≤0, (2) where the summation is over the nearest neighbors, Ui≥0 is a threshold value, Tijdescribes the coupling between nearest neighbors. Since ligand bindi ng causes the conformational state to change from V0toV1, we setV0<V1andH >0. Hence, with Tij=TjiandTii= 0, the dynamics is determined by the following Hamiltonian und er the constraint that the sum ofniis conserved, H=−t/summationdisplay <ij>ninjViVj−/summationdisplay iHiniVi+U/summationdisplay iniVi, (3) where /an}bracketle{tij/an}bracketri}htrepresents pairs of nearest neighbors, TijandUihave been set to be constants. The kinetic energy has been neglected. For convenience, we may transform to a “spin” language, with the definition Si= 2(Vi− V0)/(V1−V0)−1, hence it is 1 if Vi=V1, and is −1 ifVi=V0. Then in order to simply the mathematics without loss of the essence of physics, suppose V1=−V0, which is also quite reasonable from the symmetric point of view. Therefore we ob tain the following simplified Hamiltonian H=−J/summationdisplay <ij>ninjSiSj−/summationdisplay iBiniSi, (4) 4withJ=t(V1−V0)2/4,Bi= (Hi−U)(V1−V0)/2, which is thus B1= (H−U)(V1−V0)/2 with probability cand isB2=−U(V1−V0)/2 with probability 1 −c, i.e p(Bi) =cδ(Bi−B1) + (1 −c)δ(Bi−B2). (5) SIGNALLING SENSITIVITY The conformational changes of the receptors leads to the sig nalling, which can be defined as the change of/summationtext iniVi, averaging over the thermodynamic ensemble. It can be calcu lated analytically in an approximate mean field theory. Define niSiasS′ i,m=/an}bracketle{tS′ i/an}bracketri}htis its ensemble average with the Hamiltonian given by (4), and (5). Let m0is the value of /an}bracketle{tS′ i/an}bracketri}htwithc= 0, i.e. no ligand binding in the system. Then the signal, i.e the activity change, is given by (m−m0)(V1−V0)/2. One may obtain m=cF(m,B 1) + (1 −c)F(m,B 2), (6) where F(m,B) =eβνJm +βB−e−(βνJm +βB) eβνJm +βB+e−(βνJm +βB)+ 1. (7) Thus m0=F(m0,B2). (8) βis the measure of the noise; in the simplest interpretation, the noise is purely thermal, β= 1/kBT, whereTis the temperature, kBis the Boltzmann constant. The sensitivity may be quantitatively measured by S=1 2∂m ∂c|c=0. ∂m ∂c|c=0=F(m0,B1)−F(m0,B2) 1−βνJ[eβνJm0+βB2+e−(βνJm0+βB2) eβνJm0+βB2+e−(βνJm0+βB2)+1−(eβνJm0+βB2−e−(βνJm0+βB2))2 (eβνJm0+βB2+e−(βνJm0+βB2)+1)2], (9) which shows that the sensitivity can be very large, if the val ue ofβνJis appropriate. 5CLUSTERING The conformation-dependent interaction is also responsib le for clustering. The first term of the Hamiltonian in (4) implies that, in order to minimize t he Hamiltonian, the receptors tend to aggregate together to maximize the number of nonzero ninjfor neighboring /an}bracketle{tij/an}bracketri}htwith Si=Sj. Therefore receptors with the same conformational state te nds to cluster. At a non- zero temperature,they cannot all cluster together, howeve r, because clustering diminishes entropy. As an illustration of the situation, two snapshots of the configuration obtained in Monte Carlo simulations are shown in Fig. 1. The second term in Eq. (4) determines how ligand binding affec ts the clustering situation. It can be seen that the value of the threshold, U, which determines the bias of the distribution of the receptor state {Si}in the absence of ligand binding, also determines whether li gand binding enhances or suppresses the clustering. There are tw o extreme cases, as in the following. Case (I):U=H. A sole ligand binding of a receptor is enough to change its co nforma- tional state. Then B1= 0,B2=−H(V1−V0)/2. Case (II):U= 0. In the absence of ligand binding, there is no bias in the st ate distribu- tion. Then B1=H(V1−V0)/2,B2= 0. These two cases can map to each other with the transformation H→ −Handc→1−c. In case (I), since B2<0, in the absence of ligand, all Sitend to be close to −1. Ligand binding causes more Sito be 1. Because receptors with the same value of Sitend to cluster, those with different Sitend to be disconnected, the conclusion is that ligand bindi ng suppresses clustering. In case (II), the situation is on the converse. In the absence of ligand binding, there is no biasing field, so there are equal probabilities for Sito be 1 and −1, consequently the clustering is minimized. When there is ligand binding, the c lustering is enhanced. For other values of the threshold, i.e. U/ne}ationslash= 0 andU/ne}ationslash=H, we have the following general picture. Without ligand binding, there is a uniform field B2at every site. In the presence 6of ligand binding, there is a random field as given by (5). With a very rough mean field estimation, one may see that whether the clustering is enhan ced depends on whether (1 − c)B2+cB1has larger absolute value than |B2|. Thus only if H >2U/c, is the clustering enhanced by ligand binding. Case (II) belongs to this range. The clustering of receptors can be studied quantitatively b y defining a clustering corre- lation function as C(r) =/an}bracketle{tnini+r/an}bracketri}ht − /an}bracketle{tn/an}bracketri}ht2 /an}bracketle{tn/an}bracketri}ht2, (10) where the average is over different sites iand different directions of rfirst, and then over the thermodynamic ensemble, i.e. different possible configurat ions at the same temperature. /an}bracketle{tn/an}bracketri}ht is the density of receptors on the lattice. If there is no clus tering correlation, /an}bracketle{tnini+r/an}bracketri}ht=/an}bracketle{tn/an}bracketri}ht2, thusC(r) = 0. This definition measures the deviation from the non-cor relating case and allows comparison of situations for different receptor dens ities. SIMULATION RESULTS To investigate the extent of clustering and to calculate the signalling, we have done Monte Carlo simulations using the Metropolis algorithm. We have specifically investigated Case (II), from which one may obtain the results for case (I) s imply by changing cto 1−c. The results show that significant correlations exist for sma ll value ofr. Beyond certain value ofr, the correlation function has low values. We studied correl ation functions for different concentrations cof ligand binding, with a same receptor density /an}bracketle{tn/an}bracketri}ht(Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)). From the correlation function for small values of r, it is clear that the larger the ligand binding fraction c, the larger the correlation. This confirms the above analyse s. Comparing Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), it can be seen that with larger coupling, the correlation function C(r) for smallris larger, while for large r,C(r) is closer to 0, indicating that clustering is stronger. We also studied the correlation functions for different valu es of receptor densities /an}bracketle{tn/an}bracketri}htwith a same ligand binding concentration c(Fig. 2(c)). It is shown that the smaller the receptor 7density, the larger the correlation function. This can be un derstood, since the larger the density, the less freedom two receptors can approach each ot her. We also calculate the signalling in the simulations. Fig. 3 g ives the relation between the signal and the ligand binding concentration, for different v alues of coupling. For comparison between different receptor densities, the plotted activity Mis the ensemble average of the average ofSiover all receptors, instead of the average over all lattice p oints, as defined as mabove.M=mL2/N, whereLis the square lattice size, Nis the number of receptors. From the plots, we see that the signal increases with the liga nd binding fraction c, with the coupling-noise-ratio βJ, and with the receptor density /an}bracketle{tn/an}bracketri}ht. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSIONS In this paper, we propose a statistical mechanical model whi ch accounts for clustering and signalling of receptors in a same framework. In this mode l, the interaction energy between neighboring receptors depends on their conformati onal states, therefore through this interaction, the conformational state of one receptor can i nfluence those of its neighbors. On the other hand, since the receptors are allowed to move on the membrane, the receptors with a same conformational state tend to cluster together, in ord er to decrease the total energy of the system. Therefore the clustering and signalling are u nified as two consequences of the same coupling between receptors. According to our model, clustering exists even in absence of the ligand binding. This is in accordance with a most recent experiments (Gilnoa et al., 2000). We have studied the clustering based on an appropriate definition of clustering correlation function. Monte Carlo simulations were made. To have the situation that ligand bin ding enhances the clustering, a crucial parameter, namely, the threshold value Ufor the change of the conformational state, which decides the state distribution in the absence o f ligand binding, must be in a certain range. If the values of the variable characterizing the two conformational states, e.g. the positions, are symmetric, i.e. with a same magnitud e and with opposite signs, then 8a simple possibility is that this threshold value is zero. Ne vertheless, we note that it was found experimentally that, in the absence of ligands, the re ceptors are hindered to cluster by certain inhibitors, which are squeezed out when ligands bin d (Jiang et al., 1999). Therefore in such a case, it may be constrained that clustering is alway s enhanced by ligand binding. On the other hand, our model gives rise to signalling sensiti vity, by choosing an appro- priate value of coupling-noise-ratio. We made both mean fiel d estimation and Monte Carlo calculations of the signalling. It is straightforward to make further extensions of this mod el, for example, to put in more details of the realistic systems, including the possibilit y that a receptor has more than two conformational states. The adaptation can be studied by str aightforwardly generalizing the previous approach based on a counteracting field as a feedbac k from the signal to the field (Shi, 2000). In the present case, both signalling and the clu stering are adapted through a feedback, in a long time scale. A simple and direct test of our model is to examine whether conformational state of a receptor can be changed by ligand b inding of its neighboring receptors. 9FIGURES FIG. 1. Configurational snapshots of 300 receptors on a 50 ×50 lattice. Each is in 10000 Monte Carlo steps after an initial random configuration. An e mpty circle represents a receptor withSi=−1 and Bi= 0, a filled circle represents a receptor with Si=−1 and Bi=B, an empty square represents a receptor with Si= 1 and Bi= 0, a filled square represents a receptor with Si= 1 and Bi=B.c= 0.8 is the probability for Bito be B1−cis the probability for Bito be 0. (a) βJ= 0.8,βB= 2. (b) βJ= 1.6,βB= 2. FIG. 2. Monte Carlo calculation of the clustering correlati on function C(r) for receptors on a 50×50 lattice. The result is obtained by averaging over differen t sites with the same distance, and over 1000 Monte Carlo steps following 10000 initial steps to approach equilibrium. βB= 2. (a) βJ= 1.6, there are 300 receptors, results for different values of li gand binding concentration are displayed as different symbols. (b) βJ= 0.8, there are 300 receptors, results for different values of ligand binding concentration are displayed as different sym bols. (c) βJ= 0.8, the ligand binding fraction c= 0.8, results for different total numbers of receptors are displ ayed as different symbols. FIG. 3. Monte Carlo calculation of the signalling of the rece ptors on a 50 ×50 lattice. For comparison between different densities of receptors, what i s shown is the thermodynamic ensemble average of Siaveraged over all the receptors M, rather than m, the ensemble average of Siaveraged over all lattice sites. M=mL2/N, where Nis the number of receptors, L2is the number of sites. The result is obtained by averaging over all receptors and ov er 1000 Monte Carlo steps following 10000 initial steps to approach equilibrium. βB= 2. We give the relation between Mand ligand binding fraction c. (i)N= 300, βJ= 0 ( •), i.e. there is no receptor-receptor interaction. (ii) N= 300, βJ= 0.4 (+). (iii) N= 300, βJ= 0.8 (×). (iv) N= 300, βJ= 1.6 (⊙). In this case, the deviation of M(c= 0) from 0 is spontaneous ‘magnetization’ due to strong coup ling, but the negative feedback on a longer time scale, as discussed in (Shi, 2000), can bring it to 0. (v) N= 900, βJ= 0.8 (♦). 101 50150 111 50150 12-0.500.511.522.5 0 5 10 15 20 25C(r) rc=0 c=0.1 c=0.2 c=0.4 c=0.5 c=0.6 c=0.8 c=1 1300.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91 0 5 10 15 20 25C(r) rc=0 c=0.1 c=0.2 c=0.4 c=0.5 c=0.6 c=0.8 c=1 1400.20.40.60.811.2 0 5 10 15 20 25C(r) rN=100 N=300 N=500 N=700 N=900 N=1200 15-0.200.20.40.60.81 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1M C 16REFERENCES [1] Ashkenazi, A., and Dixit, V. M. 1998. Death receptor: Sig naling and modulation. Sci- ence. 281:1305-1308. [2] Bray, D., Levin, M. D., Morton-Firth, C. J. 1998. Recepto r clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393:85-88. [3] Duke, T. and Bray D. 1999. Heightened sensitivity of a lat tice of membrane receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10104-10108 (1999). [4] Germain, R. N. 1997. T-cell signaling: the importance of receptor clustering. Curr. Biol. 7:R640-R644. [5] Giancotti, F. G., and Ruoslahti, E., 1999. Integrin Sign aling. Sience 285: 1028-1032. [6] Gilboa, L., Nohe, A., Geissendorfer, T., Sebald W., Heni s Y. I., and Knaus, P. 2000. Bone morphogenetic protein receptor complexes on the surfa ce of live cells: A new oligomerization mode for serine/threonine kinase recepto rs.Mol. io. Cell 11:1023-1035 [7] Guo, C., and Levine, H., 1999. A thermodynamic model for r eceptor clustering Biophys. J.77:2358-2365. [8] Heldin, C.-H. 1995. Dimerization of cell surface recept ors in signal transduction. Cell 80:213-223. [9] Jiang, Y., Woronicz, J. D., Liu, W., and Goeddel, D. V. 199 9. Prevention of constitutive TNF receptor 1 signaling by silencer of death domains. Science . 283:543-546. [10] Jasuja, R., Lin, Y., Trenthan D. R., and Khan S. 1999. Res ponse tuning in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11346-11351. [11] Lemmon, M. A., Bu, Z., Ladbury, J. E., Zhou, M., Pinchasi , D., Lax, I., Engelman, D. M., and Schlessinger, J. 1997. Two EGF molecules contribute additively to stabilization of the EGFR dimer. Embo J. 16:281-294. 17[12] Lemmon, M. A., Schlessinger, J. 1994. Regulation of sig nal transduction and signal diversity by receptor oligomerization. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19:459-463. [13] Parkinson, J. S., and D. F. Blair, D. F., 1993. Science , 259: 1701-1702. [14] Reich, Z., Boniface, J. J., Lyons, D. S., Borochov, N., W achtel, E. J., and Davis, M. M. 1997. Ligand-specific oligomerization of T-cell receptor m olecules. Nature 387:617-620. [15] Shi, Y., and Duke, T. 1998. Cooperative model of bacteri al sensing. Phys. Rev. E 58:6399-6406; also obtainable at http://xxx.lanl.gov/ab s/physics/9901052. [16] Shi, Y. 2000. Adaptive Ising model and bacterial chemot actic receptor network. Euro- phys. Lett. 50:113-119; also obtainable at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/ physics/9901053. [17] Shulz, A., Grosse, R., Schultz, G., Gudermann, T. and Sc h¨ oneberg, T. 2000 Struc- tural implication for receptor oligomerization from funct ional reconstituation studies of mutant V2 vasopressin receptors. J. Bio. Chem. 275: 2381-2389. 18

arXiv:physics/0007051v1 [physics.atom-ph] 16 Jul 2000Quasi-continuous atom laser in the presence of gravity F. Gerbier, P. Bouyer and A. Aspect Groupe d’Optique Atomique, Laboratoire Charles Fabry de l’ Institut d’Optique, UMRA 8501 du CNRS, Bˆ at. 503, Campus universitaire d’Orsay, B.P. 147, F-91403 ORSAY CEDEX, FRANCE (February 21, 2014) We analyse the extraction of a coherent atomic beam from a trapped Bose-Einstein condensate using a rf transition to a non-trapping state at T=0 K. Our quantum treatment fully takes gravity into account but neglects all interactions in the free falling beam. We obtain an analytical expression of the output rate and of the wave function of the extracted beam, i.e.the output mode of the “atom laser”. Our model repro- duces satisfactorily experimental data without any adjust able parameter. Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC) of dilute alkali va- pors [1] represents a potential source of matter waves for atom interferometry, since it has been proven [2] that they are inherently coherent. Various schemes for “atom lasers” have been used to extract a coherent matter wave out of a trapped BEC. Pulsed devices were demonstrated by using a spin-flip radio frequency (rf) pulse [3], Raman transitions [4] or gravity-induced tunneling from an op- tically trapped BEC [5]. Later on, a quasi-continuous atom laser has been demonstrated by using a weak rf field that continuously couples atoms into a free falling state [6]. This “quasi-continuous” atom laser promises spectacular improvements in applications of atom optics, for example in the performances of atom-interferometer- based inertial sensors [7]. Gravity plays a crucial role in outcouplers with spin-flip rf transitions: it determines the direction of propagation of the matter wave, as well as its amplitude and phase. However, to our knowledge, most of the theoretical stud- ies of rf couplers do not take gravity into account. This is the case in the numerical treatments of [8–10], and in the semi-classical analytical approaches of [11,12]. Gravity has been included in a 3D numerical treatment restricted to very short pulses [14], relevant for the experiment of [3], and in the 1D simulation of [13], relevant for the ex- periment of [6], with which it agrees only qualitatively. In this paper, we present a quantum 3D analytical treat- ment fully taking gravity into account. After a short presentation of the basic equations, assumptions and ap- proximations of our model, we identify the weak coupling regime relevant to the quasi-continuous atom laser. We obtain an analytic expression for the atom laser wave function and for the output rate, from which we derive ageneralized rate equation for the trapped BEC. We then show that our model reproduces satisfactorily the exper- imental results of [6], without any adjustable parameter. We consider a87Rb BEC in the F= 1 hyperfine level atT= 0K. Them=-1 state is confined in a harmonic magnetic potential Vtrap=1 2M(ω2 xx2+ω2 ⊥y2+ω2 ⊥z2). A rf magnetic field Brf=Brfcos(ωrft)excan induce tran- sitions tom=0 (non-trapping state) and m=+1 (ex- pelling state). The coupling matrix element is ¯ hΩrf/2, with the Rabi frequency Ω rf=µBBrf/¯h2√ 2 (gF=- 1/2 is the Land´ e gfactor). Within the Hartree-Fock approximation, the condensate three-component spinor wavefunction Ψ′= [ψ′ m]m=−1,0,+1obeys a coupled non linear Schr¨ odinger equation [8]. As in [11], we make the rotating wave approximation and the transformation ψm′=ψmeimωrft, and we consider the “weak coupling limit”. In this limit to be defined more precisely later, the Rabi frequency is low enough that the populations Nmof the three Zeeman sublevels obey the following in- equality:N+1≪N0≪N−1. In the rest of this paper, we therefore restrict ourselves to m=-1 andm=0, and set the total atomic density n(r)≈|ψ−1(r,t)|2. Finally, we neglect all interactions in the free falling state (we discuss later this approximation). At this stage, we are left with the following two coupled equations: i¯h∂ψ−1 ∂t=h−1ψ−1+¯hΩrf 2ψ0 (1a) i¯h∂ψ0 ∂t=h0ψ0+¯hΩrf 2ψ−1 (1b) withh−1=Voff−¯hωrf+p2/2M+Vtrap+U|ψ−1|2 andh0=p2/2M−Mgz. The origin of the zaxis is at the center of the condensate, displaced by grav- ity from the magnetic field minimum ( zsag=g/ω2 ⊥). We have taken the zero of energy at z= 0 inm=0, so that the level splitting at the bottom of the trap is Voff=µBB0/2 +Mg2/2ω2 ⊥(B0is the bias field). Inter- actions are described by U= 4π¯h2a/M(a≈5 nm ). We will expand the two components of the wavefunc- tion onto the eigenstates φmof the uncoupled “effective hamiltonian” (taking Ω rf= 0 in Eq.(1)). For the m=-1 sublevel, we solve for the ground state in the Thomas- Fermi (TF) approximation [15] Gerbier 1 February 21, 2014φ−1(r) = max/bracketleftBig (µ/U)1/2[1−˜r2 T−(˜z)2]1/2,0/bracketrightBig (2) In the rest of the paper, we will use the reduced coordi- nates, ˜r2 T=(x/x0)2+ (y/y0)2in the transverse plane and ˜z=z/z0in the vertical direction such that ˜ r2 T+ ˜z2)≤1. The BEC dimensions are respectively x0=(2µ/Mω2 x)1/2 andy0=z0=(2µ/Mω2 ⊥2)1/2, while the chemical potential isµ=(15/8π)Ux0y0z0(σ=(¯h/mω )1/2andω=(ωxω2 ⊥)1/3). The energy of the uncoupled eigenstates is E−1=Voff+ µ−¯hωrf. In the following, we will take typical values corresponding to the situation of [6]: N= 7×105atoms initially,ωx=2π×20 Hz and ω⊥=2π×180 Hz, which givesx0≈55µm ,z0≈5µm andµ/h≈2.2 kHz. For them=0 state, the hamiltonian of equation (1b) with Ω rf=0 is separable. In the horizontal plane (x,y), the eigenstates are plane waves with wavevectors kx,ky that we quantize with periodic boundaries conditions in a 2D box of size L. Consquently, wavefunction is φ⊥ 0(x,y) =L−1ei(kxx+kyy)and the density of states is ρxy=L2/4π2. Along the vertical direction z, we must solve the usual 1D Schr¨ odinger equation for a free falling particle [16]. The exact solution is φ(zEz) 0=A.Ai(−ζEz), whereAiis the Airy function of the first kind taken for the reduced variable ζEz= (z−zEz)/l. The classical turning point zEz=−Ez/mgassociated with the verti- cal energyEzlabels the vertical solution. We defined the length scale l= (¯h2/2M2g)1/3such thatl≪x0,y0,z0 (for87Rb,l≈0.28µm). In the following, we will rather use the WKB approximation which reads: z>∼zEz:φ(zEz) 0=A/radicalbig π|ζEz|1/2cos(2 3|ζEz|3/2−π 4) (3a) z<∼zEz:φ(zEz) 0=A 2/radicalbig π|ζEz|1/2e−2 3|ζEz|3/2−iπ 4 (3b) This amounts to taking the asymptotic form of Ai. If we quantize φ(zEz) 0 by imposing a node on a ‘’fic- titious” barrier at position z=H(that can be arbi- trarily large), and neglect the contribution of the in- terval [ −∞,zEz], whereAifalls off very quickly, we obtain the normalization factor A=(π/l)1/2α−1 H, where αH=((H−zEz)/l)1/4(we have replaced the rapidly os- cillating cos2term by 1/2). The density of longitudinal modes isρz(zEz)=(1/2πl)α2 H. Finally, the output modes are given by φ(n) 0(r)=φ⊥ 0(x,y)φ(zEz) 0(z), where n stands for the quantum numbers ( kx,ky,zEz). The density of modes isρ3D=L2α2 h/8π3l. We thus have reduced the problem to the coupling of an initially populated bound state Ψi=φ−1⊗ |m=−1/angbracketright, of energyEi=Voff+µ−¯hωrfto a quasi-continuum of final states Ψf(n)=φ(n) 0⊗ |m= 0/angbracketright, with a total energy E(n) f=¯h2(k2 x+k2 y)/2M−Mgz Ez. A crucial feature in this problem is the resonant bell-shape of the coupling matrix element Wfi=(¯hΩrf/2)/angbracketleftφ(n) 0|φ−1/angbracketright. Because of the properties of the Airy function (see Appendix A and Ref. [17]), the above overlap integral is non-vanishing only if zEzbelongs to [ −z0,z0] (within a negligible uncertaintyof orderl). This corresponds to accessible final energies E(n) f≈Eirestricted to an interval ∆ ∼2Mgz 0∼20kHz, which gives a resonance condition for the frequency ωrf [6,10]: |¯hωrf−Voff−µ|<∼Mgz 0 (4) Here and in the following, we neglect the transverse ki- netic energy ¯ h2k2/2M(we will discuss this point later). FIG. 1. Atom laser in the weak coupling regime. 1a : time evolution of the laser intensity. For t≫tc, the numerical integration of Eq.(1) agrees with the output rate of Eq.(5). 1b : Spatial intensity profile of the atom laser at t≫tc according to Eq.(6) We can describe the outcoupler dynamics by using the results of [18] for the coupling of a discrete level to a continuum. If the coupling matrix element takes sig- nificant values only for a finite range ∆ in energy, two different situations can be distinguished. In the strong coupling regime ( hΓ≫∆, where Γ is the transition rate given by the Fermi golden rule), the discrete level ex- hibits Rabi oscillations with the narrow-band continuum. This describes the pulsed atom laser experimentally re- alized by Mewes et al. [3]). On the contrary, in the weak coupling limit ( hΓ≪∆), oscillations persist only for t≤tc=h/∆∼0.05ms. We have verified this behaviour on a 1D numerical integration analogous to [13] Fig.(1a). Fort≥tc, the decay of the discrete level is monotonous with a rate Γ, which is calculated in Appendix A : Γ Ω2 rf≈15π 32¯h ∆[1−(Voff+µ−¯hωrf ∆/2)2]2(5) Quasi-continuous output corresponds to the weak cou- pling regime ( hΓ≪∆). From Eq.(5), we deduce a criti- cal Rabi frequency (for which hΓ∼∆) ΩC rf∼0.8∆/¯h. To Gerbier 2 February 21, 2014obtain Eq.(5), we have neglected the transverse kinetic energy. In this approximation, first order time dependent perturbation theory (valid for tc≤t≤Γ−1) also gives an analytical expression for the outcoupled atomic wave function, i.e.the atom laser mode (see Fig.(1b)): ψ0(r,t)≈ −2A′iπ¯hΩrf Mgle−i2 3|ζEz|3/2e−iπ 4e−iE−1t 2¯h 1√ π|ζEz|1/2φ−1(0,0,zEi)f⊥(x,y)(6) In this expression, we kept only the complex component of cos(2 3|ζEz|3/2−π 4) in Eq.(3a) that propagates down- wards. The transverse profile is f⊥(x,y)=/integraltext+∞ 0dv(vcosv−sinv)J0(vrout)/v2(7) whereJ0is the Bessel function. We defined r2 out= (x/xout)2+ (y/yout)2, withxout(resp.yout) =x0(resp. y0) (1−(2Ei/∆)2)1/2. The constant A′can be calculated from the expression of Γ. We now model the time evolution of the number of trapped atoms N−1. Intuitively, one would write a rate equation using Eq.(5). However, the non linearity aris- ing from the dependence of the output rate with N−1 should not be neglected and we assume that the con- densed state adiabatically follows the evolution of the TF solution calculated with the time varying chemical potential [19]. With this approximation, the Wigner- Weisskopf treatment leads, after integration over space, to the non linear rate equation: dN−1 dt=−Γ[N−1]N−1 (8) We can now compare our model to the data of Bloch et al[6]. Integrating Eq.(8) with the output rate (5), we have calculated the number of atoms remaining in the condensate after a fixed time with their experimental parameters as a function of the rf frequency. A shown Fig.(2a), the model agrees with the experimental data for the |F= 1;mF=−1/angbracketright. In the |F= 2;mF= 2/angbracketrightcase the second trapping state |F= 2;mF= 1/angbracketrighthas to be included. The resolvent operator allows to treat the res- onant coupling between two discrete levels, with the first level also coupled to a continuum (decay rate Γ 2,1) [18]. If the coupling is strang (Γ 2,2= Γ2,1/2 if Ω rf≫Γ2,1), the second level acquires a decay rate Γ 2,2= Γ2,1/2 if Ωrf≫Γ2,1. We have taken this value as a first approxi- mation. This leads to a good agreement with the exper- imental data (Fig.2b). We now discuss our approximations in the case of weak coupling. Since hΓ≪mgz0, the spatial region where outcoupling takes place, of vertical extension δz∼ hΓ/mg, is very thin compared to the BEC size. This al- lows to loof at the outcoupling process in a semi classical way, in analogy with a Franck-Condon principle [9]: thecoupling happens at the turning point of the classical tra- jectory of the free falling atoms. Using this semi classical point of view, we can verify our assumptions. Our first approximation consists of neglecting the transverse ki- netic energy. A typical wavevector y−1 0corresponds to a typical kinetic energy δE∼¯h2/2My2 0≪∆ (δE∼20 Hz fory0∼5µm). Neglecting δEamounts to approximate the Franck-Condon surfaces (surfaces of equal energy) by a plane. This is correct since, over the size of the BEC, the surface curvature is small, so that the deviation from this plane is negligible compared to z0. This approxima- tion also entails that the atom laser wave function has plane wave fronts [21]. Our second approximation con- sists of omitting the interaction term in the output. In other words, we have assumed that the gravitational po- tential acting on the free falling atoms was only slightly distorted by the interaction energy within the BEC. The validity of this can be checked by comparing the mean- field energy and the gradient of the gravitational poten- tial over the condensate. This ratio is proportional to µ/∆∼0.1≪1. Gravity is thus the dominant term, although interactions may still play a significant role, es- pecially in the transverse shape of the wave function. To conclude, in this paper we have obtained analytical expressions for the output rate and the output mode of a quasi-continuous atom laser based on rf outcoupling from a trapped BEC. Our quantum treatment, which fully takes gravity and the 3D geometry into account, leads to a good agreement with the experimental results of Ref. [6]. Our model can easily be adapted to more so- phisticated situations. For instance, it can describe the weak coupling of a trapped BEC to a magnetic cavity, i.e.a smooth magnetic trap for m= 0 produced by the quadratic Zeeman effect [23]. Our model can still be im- proved by including the effects of interactions in the free beam, diffraction and finite-temperature [10]. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the mem- bers of the IOTA Atom optics group for stimulating dis- cussions, in particular the BEC team: G. Delannoy, Y. Le Coq, S. Rangwala and S. Richard. We are also grate- ful to Yvan Castin and Jean Dalibard for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work is supported by DGA (contract 99 34 050). [1] M.H. Anderson et al, Science 269, 198 (1995); C.C. Bradley et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1687 (1995); K.B. Davis et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995); C.C. Bradley et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1689 (1997) [2] M. Andrews et al, Science 275, 637 (1997) [3] M.-O. Mewes et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 582 (1997) [4] E.W. Hagley et al, Science 283, 1706 (1999) Gerbier 3 February 21, 2014FIG. 2. Number of trapped atoms after 20 ms of rf outcoupling, starting with ≈7.2×105condensed atoms, Ω rf=312 Hz for the |1;−1/a\gbracketrightsublevel (left), and ≈7.0×105atoms, Ω rf=700 Hz for the |2;2/a\gbracketrightsublevel (right). Circles are the experimental points from Bloch et al., solid line is the prediction based upon our model using the e xperimental parameters. Theoretical and experimental curves have been shifted in frequency to ma tch each other, since Voffis not experimentally known precisely enough (a precision of 10−3Gauss for the bias field B0is required to know Voffwithin a kHz uncertainty). [5] B.P. Anderson and M. Kasevich, Science 282, 1686 (1998) [6] I.Bloch, T.W. H¨ ansch and T. Esslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3008 (1999) [7] P. Bouyer and M. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083 (1997); J. Jacobson, G. Bjork and Y. Yamamoto, Applied Physics B 60,187-91 (1995) [8] R.J. Ballagh, K. Burnett and T.F. Scott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1607 (1997) [9] Y.B. Band, P.S. Julienne and M. Trippenbach, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3823 (1999) [10] Y. Japha et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1079 (2000); S.Choi, Y.Japha and K. Burnett, eprint/cond-mat 0001033 (2000) [11] H. Steck, M. Narachewski and H. Wallis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1 (1998) [12] Y. Wu and X. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 62, 62 (2000) [13] J. Schneider and A. Schenzle, Applied Physics B 69, 353- 356 (1999) [14] W. Zhang and D.F. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1248 (1998) [15] F. Dalfovo et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1998) [16] L.Landau and E. Lifshitz, Quantum mechanics (Mir, Moscow, 1967) [17] Y. Castin, private communication; also quoted in C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Cours au College de France (1999- 2000), available at: www.lkb.ens.fr \ ∼cct\cours. [18] C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc and G. Gryn- berg, Atom-photons interaction (Wiley Intersciences, New York, 1992) [19] This requires: |(∂h−1/∂t)|=ΓU|ψ−1|2≪¯hω2 k0, so that no transitions from the ground state to the jth excited level (with frequency ωj0) occur (see also the seconf of Ref. [10]). [20] Results of a similar treatment with g=0 and plane waves as final states will be published elsewhere. [21] Note that because of diffraction, this property will not persist beyond a distance zR, equivalent to the Rayleigh length in photonic laser beams. It can be estimated by writing that the transverse spreading (¯h/My out)(2zR/g)1/2becomes of the order of the size yout, i.e.zR≈y4 out/4l3.[22] Results of a similar treatment with g=0 and plane waves as final states will be published elsewhere. [23] G. Delannoy et al., in preparation. APPENDIX A: OUTPUT RATE We detail here the evaluation of the output rate. We set˜k2= (kxx0)2+ (kyy0)2and work out the overlap in- tegral I between a free mode φ(n) 0and the condensate wavefunction function φ−1treated in the TF approxi- mation. We write it in reduced cylindrical coordinates ( ˜rT,θ,˜z). Integration of ei˜k˜rTcosθoverθyields a 2πJ0 term in the transverse integral, that we integrate over ˜ rT to obtain: I= 2πA L/radicalBigµ Ux0y0/integraldisplayz0 −z0dzAi(−z−zEz l)g[p(˜k,˜z)] (A1) whereg(p) = (pcosp−sinp)/p3, andp(˜k,˜z) =˜k(1− ˜z2)1/2. We setu=z/l, and extend the integral over the real axis since u0=z0/l≫1. Next, we use the Parseval relation, and introduce the Fourier trans- forms ofg, ˜gand ofAi(x),eiu3/3. We have to calculate/integraltext∞ −∞˜g(˜k,vu 0)ei(v3/3−vuEz)dv. As the function ˜ gtakes fi- nite values on a small neighborhood of the origin (of size u−1 0≪1), we can keep only the lowest order term in the phase, which gives the inverse Fourier transform of ˜gtaken inz=zEz. This can be shown more rigorously with help of the Lebesgue theorem on uniform conver- gence [17]. This yields the simple expression: I= 2πAl L/radicalBigµ Ux0y0g(˜k,˜zEz) (A2) This expression together with the density of states per- mits to use the Fermi golden rule: Γ =π2 2¯hΩ2 rf Mgµ Ux0y0/integraldisplay+∞ 0˜k|g[p(˜k,E−1−¯h2k2 2M Mgz 0)]|2d˜k(A3) Gerbier 4 February 21, 2014Next we neglect the kinetic energy term before the po- tential energy: ¯ h2k2/2M≪E−1. The change of variable tow=p(˜k,E−1/Mg) yields a factor (1 −(E−1/Mgz 0)2)2 and/integraltext+∞ 0dw|wcos(w)−sin (w)|2w−5that we numer- ically found to be equal to 1 /4. Inserting these results into (A3),and using 8 πµx0y0z0= 15U(in the TF limit), we obtain Eq. (5). Gerbier 5 February 21, 2014This figure "fig1.JPG" is available in "JPG" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/physics/0007051v10.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 151050-5-10 Detuning of RF Coupler (kHz)0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -5-10 Detuning of

arXiv:physics/0007052v1 [physics.acc-ph] 17 Jul 2000Design Studies for a HighCurrent Bunching SystemforCLICTe stFacility (CTF3)Drive Beam Y. Thiery,J.Gao, and J.LeDuff, LAL,Orsay, FRANCE Abstract AbunchingsystemisproposedfortheinitialstageofCTF3 which consists of one (two) 3 GHz prebuncher(s)and one 3GHz travelling wave (TW) buncher with variable phase and groupvelocities. The electron beam is emitted from a 140 KV DC gun. Since the averagemacropulsebeam cur- rent (3.5 A) at the exit of the TW buncher is rather high, inside the TW buncher one has to take the beam load- ing effect into consideration. By using PARMELA, it is shown numerically that the bunching system can provide the bunches which properties satisfy the design require- mentofCTF3. The0.8meterlongTWbuncherworkingat 2π 3mode has two phase velocities, β= 0.75andβ= 1. The dimensions of the cavities in the two phase velocity regions are proposed by considering the beam loading ef- fect. Thetransientbeamloadingeffectandthe multibunch transverse instabilities are studied numerically. It is co n- cluded that higher order mode (HOM) couplers should be installed in the TW buncher with the loaded quality factor ofthe dipolemodelowerthan80. 1 INTRODUCTION CLIC is a two beam accelerator (TBA) based e+e−linear collider. As other linear collider projects, such as NLC, JLC, and TESLA, CLIC evolves in terms of its concep- tions and technologies. The recently proposedCLIC drive beamscheme[1]makesCLICmoreinteresting. Todemon- strate the feasibility of the new drive beam scheme and to test other technical aspects, CTF3 [2] has been proposed as a natural successor of the existing CTF2 to which LAL has actively collaborated and contributed in the past years [3][4]. In this paper we will restrict oursevles to the study ofthebunchingsystemforCTF3whichisanewsubjectof collaborationbetweenLALandCLICgroupofCERN. The bunching system under study consists of a 140 KV DC gun, one (two) prebuncher(s) of 3 GHz for the initial stage and one TW buncher of 3 GHz. The design means choosing bunching system layout, parameters, and numer- ical simulations. In the following sections we will discuss the design of the travelling wave buncher considering the beam loading effect, the numerical simulations of the pro- posed bunching system by using PARMELA, the multi- bunch longitudinal and transverse beam dynamics in the TWbuncherwiththepresenceoflongrangewakefields. 2 BEAM LOADINGEFFECT We start withthepowerdiffusionequationin alinac dP(z) dz=−2α(z)P(z)−IE(z) (1)where P(z)is the power flow inside the structure, E(z)is the amplitude of the synchronousaccelerating field, and I is the average beam current during the rf pulse. By using the initialcondition E(0) = E0,onegets: E(z) =E0exp(−αz)sin(φ)−IRsh(1−exp(−αz))(2) where Rsh(z)is the shunt impedance of the accelerating mode, E0=√2αP0RshandP0is the input power from therfsource, Rsh(z)andα(z)arekeptconstantwithinthe accelerating structure, φ=π/2corresponds to the max- imum acceleration, and this expression was first obtained byA.J. Lichtenberg[5]. To have goodenergytransferefficiencyand energygain at the same time, one requires (fully beam loading condi- tion): E(L) = 0 (3) where Lis the length of the accelerating section. When the ohm loss on the structure wall is small the fully beam loadedconditionresultsin P0=IE0L 2(4) For a given E0,I, andL, one gets P0from eq. 4 and one candeterminethegeometryofthedisk-loadedstructureby solvingthefollowingequations: E2 0 P0=ωRsh vgQ=4k010 c(vg/c)(5) where k010andvg/ccan be expressed analytically as [6][7]: k010=2J2 0/parenleftbigu01 Ra/parenrightbig sin2/parenleftbigu01h 2R/parenrightbig ǫ0πhDJ2 1(u01)u2 01(6) vg c=ωKeDsin(θ0) 2c(7) Ke=4a3 3πhR2J2 1(u01)exp(−αed) (8) αe=/parenleftBig (2.405/a)2−(2π/λ)2/parenrightBig1/2 (9) where the definitions of a,h,R,D, and dare given in Fig. 1. Now we make a rough design for the TW buncher working at 3 GHz and 2 π/3 mode. If one takes E0= 10 MV/m, R= 0.04m,I= 4A,L= 0.8m, one finds P0= 16MW and the structure dimensions given in Table 1. Thestructurehastwosectionswithphasevelocities β= 0.75andβ= 1, respectively. The number of the cells of β= 0.75is four which has been determined by the beam dynamicssimulationsofPARMELA.D hd 2a 2R Figure1: Disk-loadedacceleratingstructure Cell type D (m)h (m) a (m) vg β= 0.750.0250.0137 0.0146 0.031 β= 1 0.0330.02 0.016 0.029 Table1: summaryofTWbuncherdimension 3 BEAM DYNAMICS The design goal and the layout of the bunchingsystem are shown in Fig. 2, and in Fig. 3 [8][9]. A multibunchbeam dynamics study shows that for the final phase of CTF3 the dipole mode in the TW buncher has to be damped to QL,110≤80as shown in Fig. 4. By using PARMELA one gets the bunched beam parameters at the exit of the TW buncher. Limited by the space we show the simula- tionresultsinFig. 5onlyforthecaseofsingleprebuncher. TheDCcurrentcomingfromthecathodeis7Aandduring 2π, 500particles hasbeen tracked. For the observingwin- dow of 20 degree centered aroundthe bunch current peak, onegets: 322particles,thenormalizedrmsemittanceis51 mm.mrad, the rms energy spread is 0.12 MeV, the energy of the reference particle is 3.8 MeV, and the longitudinal rms bunch length is 4.4 ps. In futuresimulationstwo fully beamloadedstructureswillbeaddedaftertheTWbuncher to pushthe beamenergyuptoabout26MeV. Beam current per pulse 3.5 A Charge per pulse 1.17-2.33 nC Bunch spacing 10-20 cmBeam energy at the exit of the injector ~26 MeV Bunch length (FWHH and rms) <12 ps and 5 ps CTF3 Design Goal Normalized emittance <100 mm.mrad Single bunch uncorrelated energy spread (rms) <0.5 MeV Figure2: Thedesigngoal. 4 CONCLUSION In this paper we have given a preliminary design for the TW buncher. By using PARMELA the bunching system consisting one (two) prebuncher(s)and a TW buncher has been simulated and the results are satisfactory. More sim- ulations will be done to determine how many prebunchers are to be used and to include two accelerating sections to acceleratethebeamtoabout26MeV.Multibunchbeamdy- namicsimulationresultsshowthathigherordermodecou- plers should be installed on each cell of TW buncher with the loadedqualityfactorofthedipolemodelowerthan80.E0=10 MV/m (at the input coupler of TW buncher), L2=0.8 mL0 B2 B3 B0 B1B5B4PB1Bunching Systems Proposed for CFT3 3GHz Travelling Wave Buncher DC Gun of 140 KV 3 GHzof 2Pi/3 Mode TWB (3GHz)One Prebuncher L2 L1 For one 3 GHz prebuncher case: L0=50 cm, L1=40 cmTWB: 4 cells of phase velocity =0.75 c and 21 cells of phase velocity = c Figure3: Theschematiclayoutofthebunchingsystem. Figure 4: The bunch separation is 20 cm (final phase of CTF3), and the TWbuncheris dampedwith QL,110= 80. AttheexitoftheTWbuncher: (a)Thetransversemotionof abunchtrainwithaninitialoffsetof1mm. (b)Theenergy gainofthebunchtrain. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We thank L. Rinolfi and E. Jensen for providinguseful in- formationanddiscussions. 6 REFERENCES [1] H.Braun, et al.,CLICNote 367. [2] CLICstudyteam, CLICNote 402 [3] G.Bienvenu and J.Gao, EPAC96,Barcelona, 1996, p. 495. [4] J.Gao, LAL-SERA-99-36. [5] A.J. Lichtenberg, Rev. Sci.Instr. ,33, No. 3(1962), p. 395. [6] J.Gao, Nucl. Instr.and Methods , A381 (1996), p.174. [7] J.Gao, Particle Accelerators , Vol. 43(4) (1994), p.235. [8] L.Rinolfi,Proceedings of LC99,Frascati,Italy, Oct.19 99. [9] Meeting note between H. Braun and D. Yeremian, Feb. 28- 29, 2000 at SLAC.∆φ (deg)Particle population ∆φ (deg)Particle population ∆φ (deg)Particle population ∆φ (deg)Particle population W (MeV)Particle population Z (cm)E (MV/m) Z (cm)E (MV/m) Z (cm)E (MV/m) Z (cm)B (Gauss) x (mm)xp (mrad)Cathode Entrance of the prebuncher Entrance of the TW buncher Exit of the TW buncher Exit of the TW buncher E field in the prebuncher E field in the TW buncherE field felt by the reference particle B field Beam envelope Phase space at the exit of the TW buncherZ (cm)Particle population05 -200 0 2000510 -200 0 20001020 -200 0 200 0100200 -200 0 20002550 2 4 0 100050100150200 00.51 48 50 52-10010 100 150010 0 100 0250500 0 100051015 0 100-10010 -10 0 10 Figure5: PARMELA simulationresults.

arXiv:physics/0007053v1 [physics.chem-ph] 17 Jul 2000Temperature, Pressure & Solvent Dependence of Positronium Acceptor Reactions Debarshi Gangopadhyay∗, Bichitra Ganguly∗& Binayak Dutta-Roy† ∗Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, I/AF Bidhannagar, Calcu tta 700 064, India †S.N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, III/JD Bidhan nagar, Calcutta 700 098 PACS No.: 82.55.+e,71.60.+z, 78.70.Bj Abstract Positronium (Ps) reaction rates ( κ) with weak Acceptors (Ac) leading to the formation of Ps-Ac Complexes show several intriguing features: non-m onotonic temperature depen- dence of κ(departing from the usual Arrhenius paradigm), considerab le variability of κ with respect to different solvents, and anomalies in respons e to external pressure at ambi- ent temperature (large changes of κin some media and hardly any in others). We explain all these phenomena, introducing the novel concept of a crit ical surface tension, which unifies observations in diverse non-polar solvents at differ ent temperatures and pressures. The Positronium (Ps) atom, as the ‘lightest isotope of hydro gen’, enters into various chemical reactions, amongst which we shall concentrate here on those with diamagnetic organic com- pounds (equipped with a suitable low-lying molecular orbit al) such that a Positronium-Acceptor (Ps-Ac) Complex can form in the presence of some solvent (S). The observed rate constant ( κ) for a given Acceptor depends on the solvent and for a given solvent varies in a rather remarkable manner with temperatu re (T), namely: •κincreases with Tat low temperatures, •κreaches a maximum at T=T0(the turnover temperature), •κdecreases with increasing TaboveT0. This is shown in Fig.1 for the case of the weak Acceptor nitrob enzene in different solvents. in water in toluene expt. error in heptaneκκ (M-1s-1) 1000/T1011 1010 109 108 107 theoretical (for heptane) 2.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.5 Fig.1 Observed temperature dependence of rate constants for Ps re action with nitrobenzene in different solvents. (Taken from W.D.Madia et.al., J.Am.Che m.Soc. 97(1975)5041). The lines correspond to slopes in the enthalpy dominated and diffusion controlled regimes as predicted by our model(with appropriate over-all normalization for hep tane). This unusual phenomenon [1], first observed by Goldanskii an d his group [2] at Moscow, and subsequently by Hall, Madia and Ache [3], is in sharp cont rast with the normal trend inactivated chemical processes where lnκversus 1/T(the inverse temperature) yields a straight line with negative slope, as the rate is proportional to the M axwell-Boltzmann probability factor exp( −E∗/kBT) wherekBis the Boltzmann constant and E∗is the activation energy or barrier height to be overcome by thermal agitation. Possibl e prefactors are generally taken to be mildly dependent on temperature. Another dramatic observation [4,5] pertains to the variati on of the rate constant for Ps-Ac Complex formation with external pressure at ambient temper ature, which shows surprisingly strong solvent dependence. Thus, for instance, with nitrob enzene as the Acceptor and hexane as the solvent the rate constant κwas found to be enhanced by a factor of almost thirty as the pressure was increased to ∼1000 kg/cm2, while with benzene as the solvent the same rate manifested only small variation over the same pressure rang e. This feature is depicted in Fig.2. Kobayashi [4,5] conjectured that this could indicate a diffe rence in reaction mechanism in cases which do and those which do not show marked pressure dependen ce, and that a correlation could be sought with the corresponding solvent dependence o f the turnover temperature. in benzene in hexane - 100102 101κκ (M-1ns-1) Pressure (kg/cm2)0 200 400 600 800 1000 theoretical curve for hexane Fig.2Observed dependence on external pressure for Ps reaction wi th nitrobenzene in hexane and in benzene. The predicted dependence in the case of hexan e is shown by the solid line (appropriate normalization has been done). The objective of this letter is to put forward a heuristic mod el which captures the essence of all these puzzling aspects of Positronium reactions outl ined above, through a remarkably simple and reasonably accurate semi-quantitative descrip tion. As we shall see, the widely used bubble model for Ps-annihilation in liquids provides a suit able setting for the purpose at hand. This was proposed by Ferrel [6] to account for the observed la rgeness of the ortho-Positronium (o-Ps) pick-off lifetime, whereby the positron in o-Ps seeks out an electron in the surrounding medium with opposite spin (not its partner in o-Ps which is in a spin triplet state) to decay into two gammas. He suggested that due to the repulsive interacti on between o-Ps and the atoms of the surrounding liquid, the Positronium pushes away the m olecules of the liquid and gets self-trapped in a cavity or bubble. The decreased probabili ty for the positron to find an electron (of the surrounding medium) in its immediate vicinity leads to the lengthening of the pick-off lifetime. For simplicity he took the trapping potential to b e an infinitely repulsive spherical well of radius R. The resulting quantal zero-point energy of Ps with mass 2 m(mbeing the electron mass) is E0=π2¯h2 4mR2.This exerts an outward ‘pressure’ viz. −∂E0 ∂Rto be balanced by the contractile forces of compression due to the surface tensio n (σ) of the fluid, thereby minimizing the total energy Etot=E0+4πR2σviz.∂Etot ∂R=−2π2¯h2 4mR3+8πσ= 0 resulting in a bubble of radius R0= (π¯h2 16mσ)1/4= (12.445)/σ1/4˚A , where σis measured in dynes/cm ( .624 ×10−4eV/˚A2).This model was further developed by Tao [7] and by Eldrup et al . [8] employing again the infinite spherical well but describing the picked-off electr ons as forming a thin layer uniformly coating the inner surface of the bubble. Though such a descri ption has been criticised on account of the infinite repulsion [9,10] or the unrealistic n ature of the sharpness of the bubble edge [11,12], nevertheless as a first approximation the mode l does rather well in explaining the observables in the case of pure solvents (lifetime and angul ar correlation of decay gammas). In this framework the formation of the Ps-Ac Complex within t he cavity results, through the restriction on the motion of the Positronium due to its bi nding to the Acceptor, in a release of the outward ‘uncertainty pressure’ and accordingly the b ubble begins to shrink under the influence of the surface tension. As the bubble wall approach es the Positronium (bound to the Acceptor with some energy E=−BwhereBis the binding energy), the increasing proximity of the solvent molecules leads (because of the augmented rep ulsive energy) to a reduction of the binding, until at some radius Rbof the bubble the Ps-Ac bond is broken viz. B= 0. To raise the status of this contention [13] to at least a semi-qu antitative level let us consider the Positronium to be subjected to an attractive potential V(r) due to the Acceptor, while it also feels the infinite repulsion due to the solvent located at the bubble wall at a distance R. Taking the potential V(r) to be a spherical well [14] of depth V0and rangeaviz.−V0Θ(a−R) where Θ is the step function, the relevant Schr¨ odinger equation f or the centre-of-mass motion of Ps is /bracketleftBig −¯h2 4md2 dr2−V0/bracketrightBig u=−Buforr<a (1a) /bracketleftBig −¯h2 4md2 dr2/bracketrightBig u=−Buforr>a (1b) withψ=u/r. The appropriate boundary conditions are u(r= 0) = 0 and u(r=R) = 0, while uand its derivative must be continuous at r=a, yielding the eigenvalue condition ktanκa=−κtanhk(R−a) (2) wherek=/radicalBig 4mB ¯h2andκ=√˜g2−k2with4mV0 ¯h2= ˜g2. The bond breaking radius Rb, viz. where k= 0, is thus given by Rb=a/bracketleftBig 1−tan ˜ga ˜ga/bracketrightBig . (3) Since in the leading approximation (adopted by us) the effect of the solvent is represented by an infinite repulsion (tantamount to a boundary condition fo rcingψto vanish at R), the radius Rbdepends only on the characteristics of the Acceptor vis a vis its affinity for the Positronium, and is, to that extent, same for all solvents. However, we mus t also consider the fact that the Ps-Ac-bubble system would equilibrate at some radius Rminat which the total energy is a minimum, namely, ∂ ∂R[−B+ 4πR2σ] = 0. (4) This leads to Rmin= (1 8πσ)(¯h2 4m)(1 a4)6ζ4 (ζ−tanζ)(3ζ−3 tanζ+ 3ζtan2ζ−2 tan3ζ)(5) whereζ≡˜ga. Whether the Ps-Ac-bubble system will be stable or not will d epend on whether Rminis greater than or lesser than the bond-breaking radius Rb. A big step forward is made possible by our recognition that in leading approximation Rb is essentially solvent independent, while solvent depende nce enters through Rminand that too only through σ. As the surface tension of the solvent is a function of temper ature, the equilibrium radius of the bubble (with Ps-Ac inside) depend s on temperature only through σ viz.Rmin(T) =Rmin[σ(T)]. AsTis decreased, σincreases and by virtue of eq.(4) and moreexplicitly eq.(5), Rmindecreases. When Rminbecomes less than Rbthe Ps-Ac-bubble system is no longer stable. Clearly there is a critical value of σ, sayσcr, at which Rmin[σcr] =Rb, marking the watershed beyond which the Ps-Ac-bubble system destabilises. The value of Tat whichσattains the value σcrdepends on the particular solvent, but σcrdoes not, but is, in the leading order, a property of the Acceptor under consider ation. We argue that the turnover temperature T0is the temperature at which, for the solvent at hand, σ(T0) =σcr. Indeed at sufficiently high temperature where σ(T)< σ cr, a large negative change in enthalpy occurs as the reactants [Ps in a bubble of radius R0= (π¯h2 16mσ)1/4and the Acceptor] react to form the product [Ps-Ac Complex in bubble] with the radius having shrunk toRmin. This makes it a down-hill reaction, since for weak Acceptors the activa tion energy is expected to play a sub-dominant role and also the effect of solvent viscosity is negligible (because the complex is protected by the bubble from the buffetting by the solvent mol ecules). It is thus basically the negative activation volume that is responsible for the anti -Arrhenius behaviour for T >T 0. On the other hand for T < T 0whenσ(T)> σ crthe Ps-Ac-bubble system is unstable, the Ac is squeezed out of the bubble and the formation of the Complex mu st of necessity take place in the milieu of the solvent accompanied by the continual impact of the solvent molecules. As such, following Kramers [15] the role of the medium would be said to belong to the Smolochowski regime, with the dependence of the rate constant on the visco sity (η) varying as1 η∼D(where Dis the diffusion coefficient of the liquid, the last step being a consequence of the Einstein- Stokes relation). In view of the smallness of the activation energy for weak Acceptors, we would therefore expect that κ∼exp[−Eη/kBT], whereEηis the activation energy associated with the process of diffusion. The reaction in this region would be diffusion controlled and would exhibit a normal Arrhenius behaviour. This enables us to mak e the important prediction that σ(T0) =σcrand that it is approximately solvent independent. In order t o confront this with experiment, we have plotted in Fig.3, σ(T) againstT−T0for various solvents (for which data is available with nitrobenzene as the Acceptor). heptaneT-T0 in K σσ in dynes/cm hexane toluene -60-40-20020406080100120 benzene 16 20 24 28 32 octanol Fig.3Surface tension σ(T)for different solvents as a function of T−T0exposing the concept of the critical surface tension ( σcr) It is indeed highly gratifying to note that while T0differs widely from solvent to solvent, and also the values of the surface tension σat a given temperature for different solvents have a substantial spread, nevertheless σ(T0) =σcrfor the solvents under consideration lie in a rather narrow range, namely, σcr= 26±2 dynes/cm. Armed with this value of σcrwe are now in a position to access the Ps-Ac interaction parameters which, as we shall discuss below, are unfortunat ely not available from any othersource. Being led by the estimates of other authors [16] let u s fix the range of the interaction to bea= 1.5 ˚A , and determine ˜ gby putting, in accordance to our discussions above, σ=σcr andRmin=Rb[refer eq.(3)]. This immediately yields the value ˜ g=1.25 ˚A−1which corresponds to the Ps-Ac binding energy (the Acceptor being nitrobenzen e)B0= 0.18eV. Note that B0 signifies the basic binding in the absence of the solvent, nam ely,B0=Lim R→∞B, which implies vide eq.(2), the well-known result: −κcotκa=kthe eigenvalue condition for a spherical well. Unfortunately there is no direct measurement of this bindin g energyB0, and the approaches based on first principles [17] are beset with huge theoretica l uncertainties. However, using our methodology we have now completely tied down the model and sh all proceed to show how this explains all the main observed features, In order to find the slope of the ln κversus 1/Tplot in the higher temperature anti- Arrhenius region we recognise that this is nothing but the ac tivation free energy, the major contribution to which come from the change in Enthalpy arisi ng from the shrinkage of the bubble from its value given by R0to the size determined by Rmin, viz. 4πR2 minσ−4πR2 0σ where, of course the radii are functions of temperature thro ugh the surface tension. To this must be added the change in the Ps-Ac binding due to the approa ch of the bubble wall from R0 toRmin. The resulting behaviour (appropriately normalized) is de picted in Fig.1 for the case of Ps nitrobenzene reaction in heptane, for instance, as a solv ent. The slope obtained through our model corresponds to ≈0.15 eV which agrees very well with the experimental value. T he part of the plot in the Arrhenius regime is also shown by using the v alue of the activation energy for diffusion ( Eη). Fig.1 demonstrates that the main aspect of the temperatur e dependence of the rate has been captured in a satisfactory manner. Apart from providing an interpretation of the temperature d ependence of the reaction as set forth above, this simple model is also able to furnish an expl anation of the observed variation with the external pressure (P). In view of the small compress ibility of liquids one would hardly expect any appreciable activation volume when T < T 0as the reaction occurs in the solvent itself. However, for T > T 0due to the involvement of the bubble a large ∆ V∗(activation volume) becomes possible and hence a significant pressure de pendence can occur, in view of the basic Polyani relationship:/parenleftBigg∂lnκ ∂P/parenrightBigg T=−∆V∗ kBT(6) between the effect of external pressure on the rate of a chemic al reaction and the activation volume of the reaction (namely, the difference between the vo lume of the activated complex and the volume of the reactants). To obtain quantitative est imates it is to be noted that the initial volume viz. Ps in the bubble without the Ac must be fou nd now by minimizing the total energy, namely Etot=¯h2 4mR2+ 4πR2σ+4π 3R3Pwith respect to Rand thereby obtain R0(P). HerePis measured in kgwt/cm2(=.613×10−6eV/˚A3). Similarly the equation determining the equilibrium radius [ Rmin(P)] with Ps-Ac inside the bubble must be appropriately modifie d, so that in place of eq.(4), we now have ∂ ∂R/parenleftBig −B+ 4πR2σ+4π 3R3P/parenrightBig = 0 (7) Equipped with R0(P),Rmin(P) andB[R(P)] the variation of the rate constant with pressure can be readily calculated. Consider the two typical cases depicted in Fig.2 out of the ma ny taken from the experimental studies of Kobayashi [4,5]. All these experiments were perf ormed at ambient temperature (Texpt= 19±1oC). With nitrobenzene as the Acceptor and benzene as the solve nt we note that there is no significant effect of pressure on the reaction rate . This is quite consistent with the model in view of the fact that the turnover temperature in thi s case [18] is considerably above Texptand hence one is working in the Arrhenius region where the pre ssure effect is expected to be small. On the other hand when the solvent is hexane, the e xperiment was performedin the regime where the Ps-Ac-bubble system is stable (as the turnover temperature here is -53oC), and accordingly the reaction rate responds appreciably t o external pressure. Indeed the enhancement of the rate by a factor of about thirty in our m odel is even in quantitative agreement with the experimental results of Kobayashi. Usin g the experimental value of the surface tension of hexane at Texpt(σ≈19 dynes/cm), the model indicates the behaviour shown in Fig.2 with appropriate over-all normalization. Above a critical pressure the Ps-Ac-bubble system destabil izes and the rate versus pres- sure curve levels off. Except for the fact that there is a somew hat precocious onset of the Arrhenius regime the general experimental trend is capture d very well indeed considering the approximations involved. We may thus conclude that the simple model we have proposed eff ectively accounts for the temperature, pressure and solvent dependence of Ps-Ac C omplex formation reactions. Of cardinal importance for our discussion has been the introdu ction of the notion of the critical surface tension ( σcr) which enables us to semiquantitatively account for most ob servations and also to make the important qualitative remark: that for any s olvent at a temperature such that its surface tension is smaller than σcrthe reaction rate decreases with increasing temperature and is also significantly affected by external pressure, whil e otherwise it is the other way around. [1] O.E. Mogensen, Positronium Annihilation in Chemistry ( Springer- Verlag, 1995). [2] V.I. Goldanskii et al., Dokl. Acad. Nauk. 203(1972) 870. [3] E. Hall, W.J. Madia & H.J. Ache, Radiochem. Radioanal. Le tt.23(1975) 283. [4] Y. Kobayashi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 172(1990) 307. [5] Y. Kobayashi, Chem. Phys. 150(1991) 453. [6] R.A. Ferrel, Phys. Rev. 16(1957) 108. [7] S.J. Tao, J. Chem. Phys. 56(1972) 5499. [8] M. Eldrup, D. Lightbody & J.N. Sherwood, Chem. Phys. 63(1981) 51. [9] L.O. Roellig, Positron Annihilation, ed. A.T. Stewart & L.O. Roellig (Academic Press, N.Y.) p 127. [10] T.B. Daniel & R. Stump, Phys. Rev. 115(1959) 1599. [11] T. Mukherjee, B. Ganguly & B. Dutta-Roy, J. Chem. Phys. 107(1997) 7467. [12] D. Gangopadhyay et al., J. Phys. Cond. Matt. 11(1999) 1463. [13] A similar two potential model was suggested in A.P. Buch ikin, V.I. Goldanskii & V.P. Shantarovich, Dokl. Acad. Nauk. 212(1973) 1356 and in A.I. Ryzhkov & V.P. Shantarovich, Mat. Sci. Forum 105-108 (1992) 1699. However, with both potentials having finite dep ths there were too many parameters to give the model predictive p ower or provide a deeper insight. [14] The detailed form of the binding potential hardly matte rs. We have checked that with a Dirac delta potential V(r) =−gδ(r−a), the results are very similar. It must however be mentioned that even though the general trends in each of thes e models essentially remain the same detailed values are often very sensitively dependent o n the numerical values of parameters. [15] H.A. Kramers, Physica 7(1940) 284. [16] V.I. Goldanskii & V.P. Shantarovich, Appl. Phys. 3(1974) 335. The range 1.5 ˚A represents the distance between the active centres i.e. ele ctron of Ps and that of C+ion. [17] D.M. Schrader & C.M. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. 80(1976) 2507. [18] Indications are already there in reference 2 but very ca reful measurements recently made in our laboratory place the turnover temperature for Ps-nit robenzene reaction with benzene as a solvent at 33 ±3oC.

arXiv:physics/0007054v1 [physics.atom-ph] 17 Jul 2000Condensates beyond mean field theory: quantum backreaction as decoherence A. Vardi and J.R. Anglin ITAMP, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 60 Gar den Street, Cambridge MA 02138 (January 6, 2014) Abstract We propose an experiment to measure the slow log( N) convergence to mean-field theory (MFT) around a dynamical instability. Using a density matrix formalism, we derive equations of motion which go beyond MFT and provide accurate predictions for the quantum break-time. The leadi ng quantum corrections appear as decoherence of the reduced single-particle quantum state. A Bose-Einstein condensate is described in mean field theory (MFT) by a c-number macroscopic wave func- tion, obeying the Gross-Pitaevskii non-linear Schr¨ oding er equation. MFT is closely analogous to the semiclassi- cal approximation of single-particle quantum mechanics, with the inverse square root of the number Nof particles in the condensate playing the role of ¯ has a perturbative parameter. Since in current experimental condensates N is indeed large, it is generally difficult to see qualitativel y significant quantum corrections to MFT. In the vicinity of a dynamical instability in MFT, however, quantum corrections appear on timescales that grow only loga- rithmically with N. In this paper we propose an exper- iment to detect such quantum corrections, and present a simple theory to predict them. We show that, as the Gross-Pitaevskii classical limit of a condensate resemble s single-particle quantum mechanics, so the leading quan- tum corrections appear in the single-particle picture as decoherence. We will consider a condensate in which particles can only effectively populate two second-quantized modes. This model can be realized with a condensate in a double well potential [1–6], or with an effectively two-component spinor condensate [7,8] whose internal state remains uni- form in space. Such uniformity can be ensured, to a good approximation, by confining a very cold condensate within a size much smaller than [ n|√a11a22−a12|]−1/2, where nis the mean total density and aijis the s-wave scattering length between atoms in internal states iand j. The kinetic energy of spin non-uniformity then ensures that the spatial state of the condensate will adiabatically follow its internal state, which will evolve on slower time scales. Dynamical instabilities to phase separation are also frustrated in this regime, which since for available alkali gases all aijdiffer only by a few percent, could be reached with small condensates ( N≤104) in weak, nearly spherical traps ( ω≤100 Hz). Stronger or less isotropic traps reach the two-mode regime at smaller N. In the double well realization, the nonlinear interac- tion may be taken to affect only atoms within the same well. In this case single-particle tunneling provides a lin - ear coupling between the two modes, which can in princi-ple be tuned over a wide range of strengths. Two internal states may be coupled by a near-resonant radiation field [9,10]. If collisions do not change spin states, there is als o a simple nonlinear interaction in the internal realization . In either case the total number operator commutes with the Hamiltonian, and may be replaced with the c-number N. Discarding c-number terms, we may therefore write the two-mode Hamiltonian H=−ω 2/parenleftBig ˆa† 1ˆa2+ ˆa† 2ˆa1/parenrightBig +η 2/bracketleftBig (ˆa† 1)ˆa1−(ˆa† 2)ˆa2/bracketrightBig2 ,(1) where ωis the coupling strength between the two con- densate modes, ηis the two-body interaction strength, and ˆa1,ˆa† 1,ˆa2,ˆa† 2are particle annihilation and creation operators for the two modes. We will take ηandωto be positive, since the relative phase between the two modes may be re-defined arbitrarily, and since without dissipa- tion the overall sign of His insignificant. Instead of considering the evolution of ˆ ajand its ex- pectation value in a symmetry-breaking ansatz, we will examine the evolution of the directly observable quan- tities ˆ a† iˆaj, whose expectation values define the reduced single particle density matrix (SPDM) Rij≡ /angbracketleftˆa† iˆaj/angbracketright/N. It is convenient to introduce the Bloch representation, by defining the angular momentum operators, ˆLx≡ˆa† 1ˆa2+ ˆa† 2ˆa1 2,ˆLy≡ˆa† 1ˆa2−ˆa† 2ˆa1 2i ˆLz=ˆa† 1ˆa1−ˆa† 2ˆa2 2. (2) The Hamiltonian Eq. (1) then assumes the form, H=−ωˆLx+η 2/parenleftBiggˆN 42 +ˆL2 z/parenrightBigg , (3) and the Heisenberg equations of motion for the three an- gular momentum operators of Eq. (2) read d dtˆLx=−i[ˆLx, H] =−η 2(ˆLyˆLz+ˆLzˆLy), d dtˆLy=−i[ˆLy, H] = +ωˆLz+η 2(ˆLxˆLz+ˆLzˆLx),(4) d dtˆLz=−i[ˆLz, H] =−ωˆLy. The mean-field equations for the SPDM in the two- mode model may be obtained, without invoking U(1) 1symmetry breaking, by approximating second-order ex- pectation values /angbracketleftˆLiˆLj/angbracketrightas products of the first order ex- pectation values /angbracketleftˆLi/angbracketrightand/angbracketleftˆLj/angbracketright: /angbracketleftˆLiˆLj/angbracketright ≈ /angbracketleftˆLi/angbracketright/angbracketleftˆLj/angbracketright. (5) Defining the single-particle Bloch vector /vectors= (Sx, Sy, Sz) = (2/angbracketleftˆLx/angbracketright N,2/angbracketleftˆLy/angbracketright N,2/angbracketleftˆLz/angbracketright N), κ=ηN/2 and using Eq. (5), we obtain the nonlinear Bloch equations ˙Sx=−κSzSy, ˙Sy=ωSz+κSzSx, (6) ˙Sz=−ωSy. Mean field trajectories /vectors(t) at four different κ/ωratios are plotted in Fig. 1. The norm of /vectorsis conserved in MFT, and so for an initially pure SPDM, (6) are equivalent to the two-mode Gross-Pitaevskii equation [4]. FIG. 1. Mean-field trajectories at (a) κ= 0, (b) κ= 1.02ω, (c)κ= 2ω, and (d) κ= 20ω. The nonlinear Bloch equations (6) depict a competi- tion between linear Rabi oscillations in the SySz-plane and nonlinear oscillations in the SxSy-plane. For a non- interacting condensate (Fig. 1a) the trajectories on the Bloch sphere are circles about the Sxaxis, correspond- ing to harmonic Rabi oscillations. As κincreases the oscillations become more anharmonic until, above the critical value κ=ω(Fig. 1b), the stationary point /vectors= (−1,0,0) becomes dynamically unstable, and macro- scopic self-trapping can occur (oscillations with a non- vanishing time averaged population imbalance /angbracketleftSz/angbracketrightt/negationslash= 0) [4]. In the vicinity of the dynamically unstable point, MFT will break down on a time scale only logarithmic inN, and so an improved theory is desirable.If we assume that the condensate remains mildly frag- mented, so that the two eigenvalues of Rijarefand 1−ffor small f, we can take ˆLi=Li+ˆδLi, where the c-number LiisO(N) and, throughout the Hilbert subspace through which the system will evolve, all ma- trix elements of ˆδLiare no greater than O(N√f). The second order moments ∆ij= 4N−2/parenleftBig /angbracketleftˆLiˆLj+ˆLjˆLi/angbracketright −2/angbracketleftˆLi/angbracketright/angbracketleftˆLj/angbracketright/parenrightBig ,(7) will then be of order f. We can retain these, and so improve on MFT, if we truncate the BBGKY hierarchy of expectation value equations of motion at one level deeper: we eliminate the approximation (5), and instead impose /angbracketleftˆLiˆLjˆLk/angbracketright ≈ /angbracketleftˆLiˆLj/angbracketright/angbracketleftˆLk/angbracketright+/angbracketleftˆLi/angbracketright/angbracketleftˆLjˆLk/angbracketright+/angbracketleftˆLiˆLk/angbracketright/angbracketleftˆLj/angbracketright −2/angbracketleftˆLi/angbracketright/angbracketleftˆLj/angbracketright/angbracketleftˆLk/angbracketright. (8) This approximation is accurate to within a factor 1 + O(f3/2), better than (5) by one factor of f1/2. Succes- sively deeper truncations of the hierarchy yield system- atically better approximations as long as fis small. Applying (7) and (8) to (4), we obtain the following set of equations, in which the mean field Bloch vector drives the fluctuations ∆ ij, and is in turn subject to backreac- tion from them: ˙Sx=−κSzSy−κ 2∆yz ˙Sy=ωSz+κSzSx+κ 2∆xz ˙Sz=−ωSy ˙∆xz=−ω∆xy−κSz∆yz−κSy∆zz ˙∆yz=ω(∆zz−∆yy) +κSz∆xz+κSx∆zz (9) ˙∆xy= (ω+κSx)∆xz−κSy∆yz+κSz(∆xx−∆yy) ˙∆xx=−2κSy∆xz−2κSz∆xy ˙∆yy= 2(ω+κSx)∆yz+ 2κSz∆xy ˙∆zz=−2ω∆yz. In what follows, we will refer to (9) as evolution under ‘Bogoliubov backreaction’ (BBR). We note that (9) are actually identical to the equations of motion one would obtain, for the same quantities, us- ing the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov Gaussian ansatz. And if the second-order moments ∆ ijmay initially be factor- ized as ∆ ij=δiδj(i, j=x, y, z ), then the factorization persists and the time evolution of δx, δy, and δzis equiv- alent to that of perturbations of the mean-field equations (6): ˙δx=−κ(Szδy+Syδz), ˙δy=ωδz+κ(Szδx+Sxδz), (10) ˙δz=−ωδy. 2Thus our equations for ∆ ijare in a sense equivalent to the usual Bogoliubov equations. The quantitative advantage of our approach therefore lies entirely in the wider range of initial conditions that it admits, which may more accu- rately represent the exact initial conditions. For instanc e, a Gaussian approximation will have ∆ xx=O(1) in the ground state, where in fact ∆ xx=O(N−1). This leads to an error of order N−1/2in the Josephson frequency computed by linearizing (9) around the ground state, which is problematic because one would hope that the Gaussian backreaction result would be accurate at this order. Our SPDM approach avoids this problem, which is presumably the two-mode analogue of the Hartree-Fock- Bogoliubov spectral gap [11]. For finite motion of the Bloch vector, our formalism offers an efficient method to depict the back-reaction of the Bogoliubov equations on the mean field equations via the coupling terms −κ∆yz/2 and κ∆xz/2 in (9). Because in general ∆ yz(t)/negationslash= ∆ xz(t), this back-reaction has the ef- fect of breaking the unitarity of the mean-field dynamics. Consequently, the BBR trajectories are no longer con- fined to the surface of the Bloch sphere, but penetrate to the interior (representing mixed-state Rij, with two non- zero eigenvalues). Thus although decoherence is gener- ally considered as suppressing quantum effects, decoher- ence of the single particle quantum state of a condensate is itself the leading quantum correction (due to interpar- ticle entanglement) to the effectively classical MFT. −1−0.50 −0.500.5−1−0.50 Sx Sy Sz FIG. 2. Mean field ( ···), Bogoliubov back-reaction ( − − − ) and exact 50 particles (—–) trajectories starting with all p ar- ticles in one mode, at κ= 2ω. In order to confirm this decoherence, and demonstrate how the BBR equations (9) improve on the mean-field equations (6), we compare the trajectories obtained by these two formalisms to exact quantum trajectories, ob- tained by fixing the total number of particles N= 50and solving Eq. (4) numerically, using a Runge-Kutta algorithm. The results for an initial state where all par- ticles are in one of the modes (corresponding to the ini- tial conditions Sx=Sy= 0, Sz=−1,∆xx=−∆yy= 2/N,∆xy= ∆ xz= ∆ yz= ∆ zz= 0) and κ= 2ωare shown in Fig. 2. The MFT trajectory passes through the dynamically unstable point /vectors= (−1,0,0). Consequently, the quantum trajectory sharply breaks away from the MFT trajectory as it approaches this point, entering the Bloch sphere interior. While still periodic on a much shorter time scale than the exact evolution, the BBR evo- lution (dashed curve) provides an excellent prediction of the time at which the break from MFT takes place (the ’quantum break time’). 01234567800.10.20.30.40.50.60.7 rescaled timeS FIG. 3. Growth of the von Neumann entropy Sof the quan- tum reduced single-particle density operator, at κ= 2ω, for N=10 ( − · −), 20 ( · · ·), 40 ( − − − ), 80 (——), 160 ( - . - . - ), and 320 ( - - - - ) particles. Initial conditions are the same as in Fig. 2. The quantum break time near a dynamical instability is expected to grow logarithmically with N. In Fig. 3 we plot the von Neumann entropy S=−1 2ln/bracketleftbigg(1 +|/vectors|)(1+|/vectors|)(1− |/vectors|)(1−|/vectors|) 4/bracketrightbigg (11) of the exact reduced single-particle density operator, as a function of the rescaled time ωtwith N=10,20,40,80,160, and 320 particles, for the same initial conditions as in Fig. 2. Since the MFT entropy is always zero, Sserves as a measure of convergence. The quantum break time is clearly evident, and indeed increases as log( N). The single-particle entropy is measurable, in the internal sta te realization of our model, by applying a fast Rabi pulse and measuring the amplitude of the ensuing Rabi oscil- lations, which is proportional to the Bloch vector length |/vectors|. (Successive measurements with Rabi rotations about different axes, i.e. by two resonant pulses differing by 3a phase of π/2, will control for the dependence on the angle of /vectors). In a double well realization, one could deter- mine the single-particle entropy by lowering the potential barrier, at a moment when the populations on each side were predicted to be equal, to let the two parts of the condensate interfere. The fringe visibility would then be proportional to |/vectors|. Since |/vectors|at a fixed time depends ex- ponentially on η, such experiments could also potentially be used to measure scattering lengths. 1021041061080246810 number of particles rescaled time at which S=0.2Γ=10−2ωΓ=10−3ω Γ=10−4ω Γ=0 FIG. 4. Time at which Sreaches 0.2 as a function of the particle number N, according to the BBR equations (9), mod- ified to include thermal phase-diffusion. Four different valu es of Γ are shown: Γ = 0 (—–), Γ = 10−4ω(· · ·), Γ = 10−3ω (− − − ), and Γ = 10−2ω(− · −). Exact quantum results are presented for Γ = 0 (circles) and Γ = 10−2ω(squares). Initial conditions, κandωare the same as in Figs. 2 and 3. Decoherence of quantum systems coupled to reservoirs shows similar behaviour to Fig. (3). The entropy of a dy- namically unstable quantum system coupled to a reser- voir [12], or of a stable system coupled to a dynami- cally unstable reservoir, is predicted to grow linearly wit h time, at a rate independent of the system-reservoir cou- pling, after an onset time proportional to the logarithm of the coupling. This shows that one can really consider the Bogoliubov fluctuations as a reservoir [13], coupled to the mean field with a strength proportional to 1 /N. But one can also consider decoherence due to a genuine reservoir (unobserved degrees of freedom, as opposed to unobserved higher moments). For example, thermal par- ticles scattering off the condensate mean field will cause phase diffusion [14] at a rate Γ which may be estimated in quantum kinetic theory as proportional to the ther- mal cloud temperature. For internal states not entan- gled with the condensate spatial state, Γ may be as low as 10−5Hz under the coldest experimental conditions, whereas for a double well the rate may reach 10−1Hz. Further sources of decoherence may be described phe- nomenologically with a larger Γ. Evolving the full N- particle density matrix under the appropriate quantumkinetic master equation [3], we again solve for /vectorseither nu- merically or in BBR approximation. In Fig. 4 we show the time at which the entropy reaches a given value, as a function of the number of particles, for various Γ, accord- ing to the modified BBR equations. The exact quantum results (limited by computation power to N∼103) are presented for the two limiting values of Γ, showing excel- lent agreement with the BBR predictions. These results can of course be interpreted as a quantum saturation of the dephasing rate at low temperature. This work was partially supported by the National Sci- ence Foundation through a grant for the Institute for Theoretical Atomic and Molecular Physics at Harvard University and Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. [1] J. Javanainen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3164 (1986); J. Ja- vanainen and S. Yoo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 161 (1996). [2] M. Jack, M. Collett, and D. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 54, R4625 (1996); G. J. Milburn, J. Corney, E. M. Wright, D. F. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4318 (1997); A. S. Parkins and D. F. Walls Phys. Rep. 303, 1 (1998). [3] J. Ruostekoski and D. F. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 58, R50 (1998). [4] A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, and S. R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4950 (1997); S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, and S. R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. A 59, 620 (1999); I. Marino, S. Raghavan, S. Fantoni, S. R. Shenoy, and A. Smerzi, Phys. Rev. A 60, 487 (1999). [5] I. Zapata, F. Sols, and A. Leggett, Phys. Rev. A 57, R28 (1998). [6] P. Villain and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2250 (1999). [7] M. R. Matthews, B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, D. S. Hall, M. J. Holland, J. E. Williams, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3358 (1999). [8] C. J. Myatt, E. A. Burt, R. W. Ghrist, E. A. Cornell, and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 586 (1997). [9] M. R. Matthews, D. S. Hall, D. S. Jin, J. R. Ensher, C. E. Wiemann, E. A. Cornell, F. Dalfovo, C. Minniti, and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 243 (1998); J. Williams, R. Walser, J. Cooper, E. Cornell, and M. Hol- land, Phys. Rev. A 59, R31 (1999). [10] Patrik ¨Ohberg and Stig Stenholm, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3890 (1999). [11] A. Griffin, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9341 (1996). [12] J.-P. Paz and W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2508 (1994). [13] S. Habib, Y. Kluger, E. Mottola, and J.-P. Paz, Phys Rev Lett76, 4660 (1996). [14] J.R. Anglin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 6 (1997). 4

arXiv:physics/0007055v1 [physics.bio-ph] 17 Jul 2000Adaptation of epistatic effects via selection for reduced mu tational load Claus O. Wilke and Christoph Adami Digital Life Laboratory 136-93 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 Corresponding author: Dr. Claus Wilke E-mail: wilke@caltech.edu Phone (+) 626 395-2338 Fax (+) 626 564-9651We investigate the relationship between the average fitness de- cay due to single mutations and the strength of epistatic int erac- tions in genetic sequences. We observe that epistatic inter actions between mutations are strongly correlated to the average fit ness decay, both in RNA secondary structure prediction as well as in digital organisms replicating in silico. This correlation implies that during adaptation, epistasis and average mutational effect cannot be optimized independently. In experiments with RNA sequen ces evolving on a neutral network, the selective pressure to dec rease the mutational load then leads to selection against sequenc es with strong antagonistic interactions between deleterious mut ations. A thorough understanding of epistatic interactions of muta tions in genomes is becoming more and more crucial to many areas in population genetics and evolutionary biology. Epistasis affects linkage disequili bria [1, 2], robustness to mutations [3] or “canalization” [4], as well as theories o n the origin and maintenance of sex [5, 6]. In particular, the sign of epistat ic effects, that is, whether deleterious mutations are reinforcing (synerg istic epistasis) or mitigating (antagonistic epistasis) influence whether or n ot deleterious mu- tations can accumulate in the genome via Muller’s ratchet [7 ]. The consensus seems to be that synergistic epistasis can prevent the accum ulation of muta- tions [7]. On the other hand, the observation of compensator y mutations [8], which also render the ratchet powerless, indicates epistas is, but not its sign. While the genomes of a number of organisms have been examined for signs of epistasis [9, 10, 11] no general trend can be discern ed except to say that interactions between mutations are frequent and of bot h signs, and that synergistic epistasis seems to prevail in eukaryotic genom es while viral and prokaryotic genomes show no preference. Experiments to mea sure epistatic interactions are difficult and usually yield results of weak s tatistical signifi- cance. Consequently, even epistasis of considerable stren gth can conceivably be missed in vitro . Here, we investigate deleterious mutations in silico . In particular, we show evidence that the strength of epistasis is correlated with the average deleterious effect of a single mutation, and that genomes with strong antagonistic interactions are, on average, selected against in a scenario which turns out to be quite general. Thus, selective pressur es in the evolution of genes seem to favor synergistic epistasis, and may provid e a road towards sexual recombination. 1Neutrality and Epistasis In a simple model of a multiplicative landscape, a mutation reduces the fitness on average by a factor 1 −s, so that for nmutations w(n) = (1−s)n≡e−αn, (1) where we defined α=−ln(1−s). If the landscape is not perfectly multi- plicative, i.e., if there exists a bias towards either antag onistic or synergistic epistatic interactions, then this bias will naturally appe ar as deviations from the exponential decay in (1). While these deviations have pr eviously been indicated by adding a term quadratic in nto the exponent of Eq. (1) [12], it appears that realistic fitness functions are better fit [3] by the ansatz w(n) =e−αnβ, (2) where β= 1 means there is no bias towards either form of epistatic int erac- tions. A β >1 indicates synergistic mutations prevail (mutations that are on average “worth” more than one independent hit), while β <1 reflects a bias towards antagonistic mutations (mutations whose “dam age” is less then one independent mutation). Note that expression (2) is only an approxi- mation for moderately small mutational distances n. Deviations from the two-parameter ansatz may arise for larger n. Naively, one might assume that the decay parameter αand the epistasis parameter βare independent. Instead, we shall see that environments wi th strong selection force a trade-off between αandβ, so that one can only be optimized at the expense of the other. The reasoning is as fol lows. In a strongly selective environment mutations can be classified as either neutral or lethal; and w(n) can be thought of as the fraction of neutral sequences in genetic space at mutational distance n. In particular, the neutrality ν of a sequence (the number of neutral one-mutants) is related to the decay parameter by ν=ℓ(D−1)e−α, where ℓis the length of the sequence, and Dis the number of monomers. If all sequences in genetic space h ave the same ν, it follows that β= 1. A deviation from β= 1 implies that some sequences have more or fewer neutral neighbors than others, giving rise to a correlation between αandβ. For a viable sequence with lower than average neutrality (higher than average α), there are comparatively fewer sequences close-by than there are far away, such that this sequence wil l have a small β. Conversely, a sequence with a high neutrality (small α) will have com- paratively more sequences close by, and βwill be larger. We can make this 2argument more formal with a simple “conservation law”, whic h only reflects that the total number of neutral sequences in genetic space i s constant. Since for polymers of fixed length ℓmade from Dmonomers there are/parenleftbigℓ n/parenrightbig (D−1)n possible n-mutants, we must have ℓ/summationdisplay n=1w(n)/parenleftbiggℓ n/parenrightbigg (D−1)n=Nν, (3) where Nνis the total number of neutral mutants of this wild type. Inse rting w(n) from Eq. (2) yields an implicit relation between αandβ. Although this argument strictly holds only under the assump tion that mutations are either neutral or lethal, it is reasonable to a ssume that a similar (possibly weaker) correlation between αandβexists also in more general cases, where slightly deleterious or even advantag eous mutations are possible. In that case, under the presence of epistasis, the re will still be regions in genotype space in which the number of less-delete rious mutations is higher, and other regions in which it is lower than average . The decay function w(n) of a sequence from a region that is rich in non-lethal mutati ons would have a higher α, but would be inevitably more synergistic than the decay function of a sequence from a region poor in non-lethal mutations. Our results on digital organisms (see below) support this reaso ning. Experimental Evidence Accurate data for the decay parameter αand the epistasis parameter β for biological organisms are rare, which makes our hypothes is difficult to test in vitro . A few well-studied systems have emerged which are accessib lein silico. Lenski et al. [3] have measured the decay of the mean fitness i n digital organisms [13, 14], and determined αandβfor 174 different genomes. The 174 genomes consist of two groups of 87 genomes each. The first group stems from organisms evolved in 87 independent runs in a complex en vironment, while the second group was obtained by allowing these organi sms to evolve further in a environment which favors simple genomes. A stat istical anal- ysis reveals a significant correlation between the decay par ameter and the epistasis parameter for both the complex organisms and the s imple organ- isms (Table 1; see also Fig. 1.). However, in addition to said correlation, we find a correlation between the decay parameter and the geno me length ℓfor complex and simple organisms, and a correlation between the epistasis parameter and the length in the case of the complex organisms . Hence, for 3Table 1: The correlation randp-value between decay parameter α, epistasis parameter βand length ℓin the data from Ref. [3]. The “Complex” and the “Simple” data set consist each of 87 digital organisms, the “ Reduced” data set consists of all 48 organisms of length between 14 and 16 ta ken from the “Simple” data set. Data sets r p Complex: αandβ−0.599 <0.01 αandℓ−0.730 <0.01 βandℓ0.338 <0.01 Simple: αandβ−0.767 <0.01 αandℓ−0.502 <0.01 βandℓ−0.058 >0.05 Reduced: αandβ−0.945≪0.01 αandℓ−0.101 >0.05 βandℓ−0.073 >0.05 the complex organisms, we cannot dismiss the possibility th at the correlation between αandβmerely reflects an underlying correlation of both quantitie s with the length. In the case of the simple organisms, where we do not see a correlation between βand the length, we can assume that the correlation between αandβis genuine. To provide further evidence, we have examined a reduced data set of all 48 simple organisms with a length bet weenℓ= 14 andℓ= 16. In that data set, we find an even stronger correlation bet ween αandβ, while the correlation between either of the two quantities and the length becomes insignificant (Table 1). It is not possible to study a similar reduced data set for the complex organisms, because the vari ations in length are too large (the length varies between ℓ= 20 and ℓ= 314 among the 87 genomes). As a second test case, we have studied RNA secondary structur e predic- tion using the Vienna RNA package [15]. We have determined th e decay of the average number of neutral folds as a function of the Hammi ng distance for 100 random RNA sequences of length ℓ= 76. A plot of βversus α (Fig. 2) shows a significant correlation as in the case of digi tal organisms, with a correlation coefficient of r=−0.817 (p <0.01). We can predict the relationship between αandβ, according to Eq. (3), 4A CB/BC/BA/BI/BC/BA/BK/BD/BA/BC/BD/BA/BE/BD/BA/BG/BC/BA/BC /BC/BA/BH /BD/BA/BC /BD/BA/BH /BE/BA/BC /BE/BA/BH/CT/D4/CX/D7/D8/CP/D7/CX/D7 /D4/CP/D6/CP/D1/CT/D8/CT/D6 /AC /BC/BA/BH/BC/BA/BJ/BC/BA/BL/BD/BA/BD/BC/BA/BC /BC/BA/BE /BC/BA/BG /BC/BA/BI /BC/BA/BK /BD/BA/BC /BD/BA/BE /BD/BA/BG/CT/D4/CX/D7/D8/CP/D7/CX/D7 /D4/CP/D6/CP/D1/CT/D8/CT/D6 /AC/BC/BA/BI/BC/BA/BK/BD/BA/BC/BD/BA/BE/BD/BA/BG/BC/BA/BC /BC/BA/BH /BD/BA/BC /BD/BA/BH /BE/BA/BC /BE/BA/BH/CT/D4/CX/D7/D8/CP/D7/CX/D7 /D4/CP/D6/CP/D1/CT/D8/CT/D6 /AC/CS/CT /CP /DD /D4/CP/D6/CP/D1/CT/D8/CT/D6 /AB Figure 1: Epistasis parameter βversus the decay parameter αin digital or- ganisms. The data sets are complex creatures (A), simple cre atures (B), and simple creatures of length between 14 and 16 (C). The respect ive correlation coefficients between αandβarer=−0.599 (p <0.01) for complex creatures, r=−0.767 (p <0.01) for simple creatures, and r=−0.945 (p≪0.01) for the reduced set of simple creatures. 5/BC/BA/BI/BC/BA/BJ/BC/BA/BK/BC/BA/BL/BD/BA/BC/BD/BA/BD/BC/BA/BH /BD /BD/BA/BH /BE /BE/BA/BH/CT/D4/CX/D7/D8/CP/D7/CX/D7 /D4/CP/D6/CP/D1/CT/D8/CT/D6 /AC/CS/CT /CP /DD /D4/CP/D6/CP/D1/CT/D8/CT/D6 /AB Figure 2: Epistasis parameter βversus the decay parameter αin random RNA sequences of length ℓ= 76. AGGC AG G UCCAU A3'5' AG CUA Figure 3: The target RNA secondary structure from Ref. [16]. if we compare the decay functions of sequences that are mutua lly neutral. For RNA folding, this means we have to determine αandβfor a set of sequences that fold into the same structure. We have perform ed experiments with the RNA sequences of length ℓ= 18 used in Ref. [16], which fold into the structure depicted in Fig. 3. For the particular case tha t all bonds are of the purine-pyrimidine type (G-C, G-U, A-U), two separate ne utral networks (a neutral network is a network of neutral genotypes connect ed to each other by one-point mutations) were found in Ref. [16], consisting of 51,028 and 5,169 sequences, respectively. For each such set of neutral sequences, Eq. (3) should predict the correlation without free parameter, as l ong as the number ofallneutral sequences Nνis known. A Monte Carlo estimate (see Methods ) yields Nν≈7.5×106, which can be used to demonstrate convincingly (see Fig. 4) that the correlation between αandβis indeed due to the conservation law Eq. (3). 6/BC/BA/BG/BC/BA/BH/BC/BA/BI/BC/BA/BJ/BC/BA/BK/BC/BA/BL/BD/BA/BC/BD/BA/BD/BC/BA/BH /BD/BA/BC /BD/BA/BH /BE/BA/BC /BE/BA/BH /BF/BA/BC /BF/BA/BH/CT/D4/CX/D7/D8/CP/D7/CX/D7 /D4/CP/D6/CP/D1/CT/D8/CT/D6 /AC/CS/CT /CP /DD /D4/CP/D6/CP/D1/CT/D8/CT/D6 /AB Figure 4: Epistasis parameter βversus the decay parameter αfor sequences on the larger of the two neutral networks of Ref. [16]. The sol id line represents the theoretical prediction, with an estimated N= 7.5×106neutral sequences in total. Selection of Epistasis The correlation between neutrality and epistasis implies t hat if one of them is subject to selective pressures, the other will too. I n Ref. [16], it was shown that a population evolving on a neutral network reduce s its genetic load by moving into the regions of high neutrality in sequenc e space. In particular, it was shown that given a random population of mo lecules on such a network, evolution tends to increase the neutrality i n the population, effectively pushing the population into the center of the neutral network. Because of the correlation between neutrality and epistasi s discussed above, we expect that this dynamic leads to a reduction of antagonis tic epistatic effects as well. Thus, the selection for neutrality observed in Ref. [16] is at the same time a selection against antagonistic epistatic effects. To verify this hypothesis, we carried out evolutionary experiments w ith the same RNA sequences from Ref. [16] described above. We performed one flow-reactor run for each of the two networks found in Ref. [16], starting with an initial population of 1,000 se quences chosen at random from the respective network. The epistasis paramete rβwas deter- mined for every sequence in the population every two hundred generations, while the population neutrality was monitored constantly. The population neutrality ¯ νis the average neutrality of all sequences currently in the p opu- 7lation. In Fig. 5, we present the results from the run on the la rger of the two networks. The neutrality of the initial population coincid es with the network neutrality (the average neutrality of all sequences on the n etwork), which is to be expected for a random initial population. Over the cour se of evolution, the average population neutrality rose to the predicted equ ilibrium value. As expected, the average epistasis parameter ¯βincreased significantly as well. Results on the second network were qualitatively identical , with βincreasing from 0.78 to around 0.86. Thus, antagonistic epistasis is se lected against during adaptation for reduced mutational load on a neutral n etwork. Conclusions Epistasis plays an important role in evolutionary theory, b ut remains em- pirically largely unexplored. Using secondary structure p rediction of RNA sequences as well as digital organisms evolving in silico , we have demon- strated a correlation between two important parameters of r ealistic genetic fitness landscapes: the average deleterious effect of single mutations and the strength of epistasis. This correlation, coupled with the s elective pressure which forces random sequences in a neutral network to cluste r in the dense areas of the network, leads to a selective pressure against s trong antagonistic epistasis. As the result of this pressure, a member of an evol ved popula- tion will have, on average, a higher βthan a random sample of the fitness landscape would indicate. It is well-known that antagonistic epistasis favors the acc umulation of deleterious mutations as well as the operation of Muller’s r atchet. Since in such a situation sexual recombination (within a fixed enviro nment) tends to worsen the loss of information, it is unlikely to evolve. T he mechanism described here provides a path towards an environment more c onducive to the evolution of recombination. Methods RNA secondary structures were obtained with the Vienna RNA p ackage, version 1.3.1 [15]. Default parameters were used, except th at the free energies of dangling ends were set to zero for the sequences of length ℓ= 18. The parameters αandβwere determined in the following manner. We calculated αexactly from the fraction of neutral one-mutants. In additi on, we sampled the function w(n) for Hamming distances up to n= 8, by calculating the structure of up to 106random neighbors of the required Hamming distance. The quantity βwas then determined from a nonlinear fit of −αnβto the 8logarithm of w(n). In order to estimate the total number of sequences folding in to the struc- ture depicted in Fig. 3, we generated 108random sequences of length ℓ= 18, of which 10,961 sequences folded correctly. From this, we es timated Nν= 7.5×106neutral sequences out of the 6 .9×1010sequences of length ℓ= 18. In the flow reactor simulations, we set the replication rates such that sequences folding into the target structure replicated on a verage once per unit time, while the replication rate of all other sequences was s et to 10−6per unit time. All sequences had a probability of µ= 0.5 to suffer one random point mutation per replication event. The possibility of several point mutations per replication event was eliminated, to guarantee that the population could not leave the specified neutral network [16]. The network neu trality, i.e., the expected neutrality of a random sequence on the network, is ¯ ν≈12.0 for the larger of the two, while the neutrality predicted for an evol ved population on that network is ρ≈15.7. The value of ρis found by calculating the spectral radius of the neutral network’s connectivity matr ix [16]. For the smaller network, ¯ ν≈10.6 and ρ≈13.5. We thank Martijn Huynen for providing access to the sequence s used in Ref. [16], and Walter Fontana for providing us with his flow re actor code. We are grateful to Richard Lenski for many useful comments an d suggestions regarding the manuscript. The genomes of digital organisms used in this study are available at http:dllab.caltech.edu/pubs/nature99/nature.shtml . This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under contrac t No. DEB- 9981397. References [1] Charlesworth, B. (1976) Genetics 83:181–195. [2] Barton, N.H. (1995) Gen. Res. 65:123–144. [3] Lenski, R.E., Ofria, C., Collier, T.C., & Adami, C. (1999 )Nature 400:661–664. [4] Rice, S.H. (1998) Evolution 52:647–656. [5] Kondrashov, A.S. (1982) Gen. Res. 40:325–332. 9[6] Kondrashov, A.S. (1988) Nature 336:435–440. [7] Kondrashov, A.S. (1994) Genetics 136:1469-1473. [8] Moore, F. B.-G., Rozen, D.E., & Lenski, R.E. (2000) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 :515–522. [9] De Visser, J.A.G.M & Hoekstra, R.F. (1998) Genet. Res., Camb. 71:39– 49. [10] Elena, S.F. & Lenski, R.E. (1997) Nature 390:395–398. [11] Elena, S.F. (1999) J. Mol. Evol. 49:703–707. [12] Charlesworth, B. (1990). Genet. Res. 55:199–221. [13] Adami, C. (1998) Introduction to Artificial Life (Springer, New York). [14] Adami, C., Ofria, C., & Collier, T.C. (2000) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4463–4468. [15] Hofacker, I.L., Fontana, W., Stadler, P.F., Bonhoeffer , S., Tacker, M., & Schuster, P. (1994) Monatshefte f. Chemie 125:167–188. [16] van Nimwegen, E., Crutchfield, J.P., & Huynen, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9716–9720. 10/CP /DA /CT/D6/CP/CV/CT /AN /D3/D2 /D2/CT/D8 /DB /D3/D6/CZ /D4/D6/CT/CS/CX /D8/CT/CS /AM /AN /CP /DA /CT/D6/CP/CV/CT /AC /D3/D2 /D2/CT/D8 /DB /D3/D6/CZ/BT/DA /CT/D6/CP/CV/CT /D2/CT/D9/D8/D6/CP/D0/CX/D8 /DD /AM /AN /BT/DA /CT/D6/CP/CV/CT /CT/D4/CX/D7/D8/CP/D7/CX/D7/AM /AC/BC /BE/BC/BC /BG/BC/BC /BI/BC/BC /BK/BC/BC /BD/BC/BC/BC/BD/BC/BD/BE/BD/BG/BD/BI/BD/BK/BC /BE/BC/BC /BG/BC/BC /BI/BC/BC /BK/BC/BC /BD/BC/BC/BC/CC/CX/D1/CT /BC/BA/BJ/BH/BC/BA/BK/BC/BC/BA/BK/BH/BC/BA/BL/BCFigure 5: Evolution of neutrality and epistasis as a functio n of time (in gen- erations). The lower graph shows the convergence of the popu lation neutral- ity to the value predicted by the spectral radius of the conne ctivity matrix. The upper graph shows the change of β, averaged over the population, in the same run. For all data points in the upper graph, the standard error of the mean does not exceed the size of the symbols. 11

arXiv:physics/0007056v1 [physics.atom-ph] 17 Jul 2000Double resonance frequency shift in a hydrogen maser M.A. Humphrey, D.F. Phillips and R.L. Walsworth Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138 (February 2, 2008) We use the dressed atom formalism to calculate the frequency shift in a hydrogen maser induced by applied radiation near the Zeeman frequency, and find exce llent agreement with a previous calculation made in the bare atom basis. The maser oscillate s on the ∆ F= 1, ∆ mF= 0 hyperfine transition, while the applied field is swept through the F= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman resonance. We determine the effect of the applied field on the Zeeman levels u sing the dressed atom picture, and then calculate the maser frequency shift by coupling the dre ssed states to the microwave cavity. Qualitatively, the dressed-atom analysis gives a new and si mpler physical interpretation of this double resonance process, which has applications in precis ion hydrogen Zeeman spectroscopy, e.g., in fundamental symmetry tests. 32.60.+i,32.80.-t,32.80.Wr,39.30.wS I. INTRODUCTION Since its development nearly 40 years ago, the hydrogen mase r has served as a robust tool capable of making high precision measurements by utilizing its excellent frequen cy stability [1–3]. Hydrogen masers are currently the most stable active oscillators over intervals of seconds to days , with applications including very long baseline interfero metry, deep space tracking and navigation, and metrology. In addit ion, hydrogen masers have been used to make precision atomic physics measurements [4–8] and for sensitive tests o f general relativity [9] and quantum mechanics [10,11]. A hydrogen maser operates on the first-order magnetic field-i ndependent ∆ F= 1, ∆ mF= 0 hyperfine transition, between states |2/an}bracketri}htand|4/an}bracketri}htof the electronic ground state (see Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 2 , atoms in states |1/an}bracketri}htand|2/an}bracketri}htare injected into a storage bulb residing in a microwave cavity t uned near the hyperfine frequency, creating the population inversion necessary for active maser oscillation. The micr owave field stimulates a small, coherent magnetization in the atomic ensemble, and this magnetization acts as a source to increase the microwave field. With sufficiently high atomic flux and low cavity losses, this feedback induces acti ve maser oscillation. The maser frequency is very stable; a well engineered hydrogen maser can have fractional freque ncy stability on the order of 1 ×10−15over intervals of a few hours. Hydrogen masers can also be used as sensitive probes of the F= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman resonances through a double resonance technique [12], in which an oscillating m agnetic field tuned near the atomic Zeeman resonance shifts the ∆ F= 1, ∆ mF= 0 maser frequency. At low static magnetic fields, this maser frequency shift is an antisymmetric function of the detuning of the applied oscil lating field from the Zeeman resonance. Thus, by observing the antisymmetric pulling of the otherwise stable maser fre quency, the hydrogen Zeeman frequency can be determined with high precision. An early investigation of atomic double resonance was made b y Ramsey [13], who calculated the frequency shift between two levels coupled by radiation to other levels. Thi s calculation treated the problem perturbatively to first order in the coupling field strength, and it neglected dampin g. Later, Andresen [12,14] calculated the frequency shift in a hydrogen maser due to an applied field oscillating near th eF= 1 Zeeman frequency (see Sec. II), and then measured this double resonance effect using a hydrogen maser , finding reasonable agreement with the calculation. Andresen’s calculation employed a bare atom basis, treatin g the problem to second order in the applied field strength and including phenomenological damping terms, but used an o versimplified description of spin-exchange relaxation. Savard [15] revisited the problem with a more realistic spin -exchange relaxation description [16], and found a small correction to the earlier work. Although the work of Andresen and Savard provides a complete description for the double resonance maser frequency shift, intuitive understanding is obscured by the length of the calculations and the use of the bare atom basis. In particular, these works demonstrate that the amplitude o f the antisymmetric maser frequency shift is directly proportional to the electronic polarization of the masing a tomic ensemble. The maser frequency shift vanishes as this polarization goes to zero. The previous bare atom analyses p rovide no physical interpretation of ths effect. 1Since the dressed atom formalism [17] often adds physical in sight to the understanding of the interaction of matter and radiation, we apply it here to the double resonance frequ ency shift in a hydrogen maser. In a two step process, we first use the dressed atom picture to determine the effect of th e applied Zeeman radiation on the atomic states. Then, we analyze the effect of the microwave cavity field on the dress ed states and determine the maser frequency shift. We find excellent quantitative agreement between the dresse d atom calculation and the previous bare atom result. We exploit the dressed atom calculation to offer a simple phys ical interpretation of the double resonance hydrogen maser frequency shift, including a straightforward explan ation of the polarization dependence. We conclude by noting the experimental application of the double resonance effect to perform improved, high precision hydrogen Zeeman spectroscopy. II. MASER OSCILLATION FREQUENCY In a hydrogen maser (Fig. 2), molecular hydrogen is dissocia ted in an rf discharge and a thermal beam of hydrogen atoms is formed. A hexapole state selecting magnet focuses t he higher energy, low-field-seeking hyperfine states ( |1/an}bracketri}ht and|2/an}bracketri}ht) into a quartz maser bulb at about 1012atoms/sec. Inside the bulb (volume ≈103cm3), the atoms travel ballistically for about 1 second before escaping, making ≈104collisions with the bulb wall. A Teflon coating reduces the atom-wall interaction and thus inhibits decoherence of the masing atomic ensemble by wall collisions. The maser bulb is centered inside a cylindrical TE 011microwave cavity resonant with the 1420 MHz hyperfine transi tion. As described above, the microwave field and atomic ensemble for m a coupled system with positive feedback that will actively oscillate near the ∆ F= 1, ∆ mF= 0 hyperfine frequency if there is a sufficiently high atomic flu x into the maser bulb. Since the atoms are confined to a region of uniform microwave field phase, their velocity is effectively averaged to zero over the interaction time with the microwav e field, and first-order Doppler effects are eliminated. The maser signal is inductively coupled out of the microwave cav ity and amplified with an external receiver. Surrounding the cavity, a solenoid produces a weak static magnetic field t o maintain the quantization axis inside the maser bulb, and a pair of Helmholtz coils produces the oscillating transver se magnetic field that drives the F= 1 Zeeman transitions. The cavity, solenoid, and Zeeman drive coils are all enclose d within several layers of magnetic shielding. To calculate the maser oscillation frequency, we first deter mine the relationship between the microwave field and a source magnetization. If we assume that a single cavity mod e is dominant within the microwave cavity, we may write the microwave magnetic field as H(r, ω) =√ 4πpC(ω)HC(r), where pCcharacterizes the frequency- (i.e. time- ) dependent amplitude and HCrepresents the time-independent spatial variation of the m ode. A straightforward application of Maxwell’s equations relates pC(ω) to a source magnetization M( ω): (ω2 C+iωCω QC−ω2)pC(ω) =√ 4πω2/an}bracketle{tH(z) C/an}bracketri}htbVbM(ω) (1) where ωis the maser frequency, ωCis the cavity frequency, /an}bracketle{tH(z) C/an}bracketri}htbis the average of the microwave field’s z-component over the bulb, and Vbis the volume of the maser bulb. The second term on the left has been introduced phenomeno- logically to account for cavity losses characterized by QC, the cavity quality factor. The source magnetization is produced by the atomic ensemble, and is given by the expectat ion value of the magnetic dipole operator (neglecting the term precessing at −ω), M(ω) =N/an}bracketle{tˆµ/an}bracketri}ht=N Tr(ˆρˆµ) =Nµ24ρ42(ω) (2) where Nis the atomic density and µ24is the hyperfine transition dipole matrix element, µ24≈ −µB. The atomic coherence ρ42(ω) is found by solving the Bloch equations ˙ρ=i ¯h[ρ, H0] +i ¯h[ρ, H int] + ˙ρflux+ ˙ρrelax (3) in steady state. The unperturbed Hamiltonian, H0, includes only the atomic state energies (given by the hyper fine and Zeeman interactions), and the interaction Hamiltonian ,Hint, describes the effect of the microwave cavity field, which couples states |2/an}bracketri}htand|4/an}bracketri}ht. For perfect hexapole state selection, the flux term is writt en ˙ρflux=r 2(|1/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t1|+|2/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t2|)−rρ, (4) where the positive terms account for the injection of atoms i n states |1/an}bracketri}htand|2/an}bracketri}htat rate r, and the last term accounts for bulb escape. The relaxation term, ˙ ρrelax, phenomenologically describes population and coherence r elaxation due to wall collisions, magnetic field inhomogeneities, and spi n-exchange collisions. 2In the absence of Zeeman radiation and for small detuning of t he cavity from the |2/an}bracketri}ht ↔ |4/an}bracketri}hthyperfine transition frequency, ω24, the maser frequency is found using Eqns. 1 - 3 to be ω=ω24+QC Ql(ωC−ω24) (5) where Ql=ω24/∆ω, the atomic line-Q, is on the order of 109[1]. Since the cavity-Q is on the order of 104, the cavity pulling is highly suppressed, and the maser oscillates near the atomic hyperfine frequency, ω24. In the presence of Zeeman radiation, the maser frequency is s hifted, as first shown by Andresen [12] and measured anew here (see Fig. 3). His calculation of the double resonan ce shift included the applied Zeeman field in the interaction Hamiltonian but otherwise left unchanged the a bove analysis for the maser frequency. To second order in the Rabi frequency of the applied Zeeman field, |X12|, and in terms of the unperturbed maser Rabi frequency |X0 24|, atom flow rate r, population decay rate γ1, hyperfine decoherence rate γ2, and Zeeman decoherence rate γZ, the small static field limit of the maser shift is given by [18] ∆ω=−|X12|2γZ r(γ1γ2+|X0 24|2)δ(ρ0 11−ρ0 33) (γ2 Z−δ2+|X0 24|2)2+ (2δγZ)2(6) where δis the detuning of the applied field from the atomic Zeeman fre quency, and ρ0 11−ρ0 33=r/(2γ1) is the steady state population difference between states |1/an}bracketri}htand|3/an}bracketri}htin the absence of an applied Zeeman field (following Eqn. 8 of ref. [12]). Physically, the population difference between s tates|1/an}bracketri}htand|3/an}bracketri}htrepresents the electronic polarization of the hydrogen ensemble [14]: P=/an}bracketle{tSZ/an}bracketri}ht S= 2Tr(ˆρˆSZ) =ρ11−ρ33. (7) Equation 6 implies that a steady state electronic polarizat ion, and hence a population difference between states |1/an}bracketri}ht and|3/an}bracketri}htinjected into the maser bulb, is a necessary condition for th e maser to exhibit a double resonance frequency shift. Walsworth et. al. demonstrated this polarization de pendence experimentally by operating a hydrogen maser in three configurations: (i) with the usual input flux of atoms in states |1/an}bracketri}htand|2/an}bracketri}ht; (ii) with a pure input flux of atoms in state |2/an}bracketri}ht, where the maser frequency shift vanishes; and (iii) with an input beam of atoms in states |2/an}bracketri}htand|3/an}bracketri}ht, where the maser shift is inverted [7]. For typical applied Zeeman field strengths, the 1420 MHz mase r frequency is shifted tens of mHz (see Fig. 3), a fractional shift of ≈10−11. However, the shift is easily resolved because of the excell ent fractional maser frequency stability (parts in 1015). III. DRESSED ATOM CALCULATION We now consider an alternative approach to calculating the d ouble resonance maser frequency shift using the dressed atom picture. We retain the Maxwell-Bloch formalism of Eqns . 1 - 3; however we determine the steady state coherence ρ42(ω) in a dressed atom basis, including the atomic state energie s, the applied Zeeman field, and the atom/Zeeman field interaction. For simplicity, we assume the static magn etic field is sufficiently low that the two F= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman frequencies are nearly degenerate, ω12−ω23≪γZ, as is the case for typical hydrogen maser operation. We use the simplified spin-exchange relaxation model [12] and n eglect the small spin-exchange correction to the double resonance maser frequency shift [15]. A. Dressed atom basis By incorporating the applied Zeeman field into the unperturb ed Hamiltonian, it takes the form H0=Ha+Hf+Vaf. The atomic states (defining state |2/an}bracketri}htas energy zero) are described by Ha= ¯hω12|1/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t1| −¯hω23|3/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t3| −¯hω24|4/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t4|; the applied Zeeman field (at frequency ωZ) is described by Hf= ¯hωZa†a; and the interaction between them is given by Vaf= ¯hg/parenleftbig a+a†/parenrightbig [|1/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t2|+|2/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t3|+h.c.]. (8) Here, the Zeeman field creation and annihilation operators a rea†anda,h.c.denotes Hermitian conjugate, and gis the single-photon Rabi frequency for the Zeeman transition s. We will use eigenkets with two indices to account for 3the atomic state and the number of photons in the Zeeman field, denoted by n. We select four of these as our bare atom/Zeeman field basis, {|1, n−1/an}bracketri}ht,|2, n/an}bracketri}ht,|3, n+ 1/an}bracketri}ht,|4, n/an}bracketri}ht}, where the first entry indicates the atomic state and the second entry indicates the Zeeman photon number. We note tha t for a resonant field, ωZ=ω12, the first three basis states are degenerate. Also, n≫1 in practice for there to be any measureable double resonanc e maser frequency shift. In this bare atom/Zeeman field basis, the unperturbed Hamilt onian operator takes the following matrix form: H0= ¯h −δ1 2X120 0 1 2X1201 2X230 01 2X23δ 0 0 0 0 −ω24 , (9) where δ=ωZ−ω12is the detuning of the applied Zeeman field, and X12 2=g√n≈g√ n+ 1 =X23 2(10) define the Zeeman field Rabi frequency (the factor of two has be en inserted to be consistent with our rotating wave approximation convention; see note [18]). By diagonalizin gH0, we find new basis states which physically represent the atomic states dressed by the applied Zeeman field. The dre ssed energy levels are the eigenvalues of H0:Ea= ¯hΩ, Eb= 0,Ec=−¯hΩ, and E4=−¯hω24, where Ω =/radicalig δ2+1 2X2 12represents the generalized Rabi frequency. The dressed states are the eigenvectors of H0: |a/an}bracketri}ht=1 2/parenleftbigg 1−δ Ω/parenrightbigg |1, n−1/an}bracketri}ht+X12 2Ω|2, n/an}bracketri}ht+1 2/parenleftbigg 1 +δ Ω/parenrightbigg |3, n+ 1/an}bracketri}ht |b/an}bracketri}ht=X12 2Ω|1, n−1/an}bracketri}ht+δ Ω|2, n/an}bracketri}ht −X12 2Ω|3, n+ 1/an}bracketri}ht (11) |c/an}bracketri}ht=1 2/parenleftbigg 1 +δ Ω/parenrightbigg |1, n−1/an}bracketri}ht −X12 2Ω|2, n/an}bracketri}ht+1 2/parenleftbigg 1−δ Ω/parenrightbigg |3, n+ 1/an}bracketri}ht |4/an}bracketri}ht=|4, n/an}bracketri}ht. Note that in the limit of large negative δ,|a/an}bracketri}ht → |1/an}bracketri}htand|c/an}bracketri}ht → |3/an}bracketri}ht, while in the limit of large positive δ,|a/an}bracketri}ht → |3/an}bracketri}htand |c/an}bracketri}ht → |1/an}bracketri}ht. This will become important in the physical interpretation of the maser frequency shift (see Sec. IV). An operator ˆOtransforms between bare atom to dressed atom bases asˆOd=T−1ˆObT, where Tis the unitary matrix linking the dressed atom and bare atom basis states (c oefficients of Eqn. 11). The dressed and bare atom energies and eigenvectors are equivalent for the F= 0 hyperfine state |4/an}bracketri}htbecause this state is unaffected by the applied Zeeman field. B. Dressed basis Bloch equations We now couple the dressed states to the microwave cavity usin g the Bloch equations, which remain of the form ˙ρd=i ¯h[ρd, Hd 0] +i ¯h[ρd, Hd int] +˙ρdrelax+˙ρdflux. (12) The unperturbed Hamiltonian, H0, now accounts for the bare atom energies and the applied Zeem an driving field, while the microwave cavity field is included in the interacti on Hamiltonian, Hint. Since the dressed states |a/an}bracketri}ht,|b/an}bracketri}ht, and |c/an}bracketri}htall have a component of the atomic state |2/an}bracketri}ht(see Eqn. 11), the microwave field couples state |4/an}bracketri}htto each: Hd int=X12 2ΩH24|a/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t4|+δ ΩH24|b/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t4| −X12 2ΩH24|c/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t4|+h.c. (13) Note that H24=/an}bracketle{t2|ˆµ·HC|4/an}bracketri}htis the only nonzero coupling between bare atom states suppor ted by the TE 011mode microwave cavity. To transform the relaxation terms into th e dressed basis, we make the approximation that all relaxation rates (population decay γ1, hyperfine decoherence γ2, and Zeeman decoherence γZ) have the same value, γ+r(γincludes all relaxation exclusive of bulb loss). Typically , these rates are within a factor of two (see the values listed in Fig. 3). Then, 4˙ρd relax=−γρd+γ 41. (14) In the bare atom basis, the flux term has a very simple form (Eqn . 4) with no off-diagonal input entries since the injected beam has no coherence between the bare atomic state s. In the dressed basis, however, there is an injected Zeeman coherence, so the flux term takes a considerably more c omplicated form ˙ρd flux=r 2Fd−rρd(15) where Fd=T−1(|1/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t1|+|2/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketle{t2|)Thas three diagonal and six off-diagonal entries. The Bloch equations are most easily handled by moving to the i nteraction picture, given by ˆO=e−iˆH0t/¯h˜ˆO eiˆH0t/¯h, where˜ˆOis an interaction picture operator. C. Steady state solution The 4 ×4 matrix equation (12) yields sixteen independent equation s that we solve in the steady state. Then, the populations in the interaction picture are static, ˙˜ρνν= 0, and the coherences exhibit sinusoidal precession. In particular, ˜ ρ4a=R4ae−i(Ω−∆)t, ˜ρ4b=R4bei∆t, and ˜ ρ4c=R4cei(Ω+∆) t, where the Rµνare time independent, and ∆ =ω−ω24. The other coherences precess at frequencies ωµν= (Eµ−Eν)/¯h. Making these steady state substitutions, the sixteen Bloch differential equations transform to a set o f time-independent algebraic equations. We assume that ωC=ω24, so that the small cavity pulling shift vanishes. The total m aser frequency shift is then given by ∆. In terms of dressed basis density matrix elements (rotated o ut of the interaction picture), the atomic coherence ρ42(ω) is given by ρ42(ω) =/parenleftbiggX12 2Ωρ4a+δ Ωρ4b−X12 2Ωρ4c/parenrightbigg =/parenleftbiggX12 2ΩR4a+δ ΩR4b−X12 2ΩR4c/parenrightbigg eiωt(16) and the magnetization is found from equation (2). Inserting this into equation (1) we find the following two conditions which determine the maser amplitude and oscillation freque ncy Re/parenleftbiggX12 2R4a+δR4b−X12 2R4c/parenrightbigg =−|X24|/parenleftbigg2QC∆ ωC/parenrightbigg /bracketleftbigg(γ+r)2 rΩ/parenleftbiggI0 Ith/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg−1 (17) Im/parenleftbiggX12 2R4a+δR4b−X12 2R4c/parenrightbigg =−|X24|/bracketleftbigg(γ+r)2 rΩ/parenleftbiggI0 Ith/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg−1 where I0=rVbNis the total atomic flux into the maser bulb and Ithis the threshold flux for maser oscillation with our simplified spin-exchange model [2]: Ith=¯hVC(γ+r)2 4π|µ24|2QCη. (18) HereVCis the cavity volume and ηis a dimensionless filling factor [1,2]. We numerically solve the time-independent algebraic syste m of sixteen Bloch equations plus equations (17) to determine the maser frequency shift ∆ as a function of Zeeman detuning δ. We find excellent agreement with the previous theoretical bare atom analysis [12], within the ap proximation of equal population decay and decoherence rates. (Note that in practice, these decay rates differ by up t o a factor of two). IV. PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION The dressed state analysis provides a straightforward phys ical interpretation of the double resonance maser fre- quency shift. In the absence of the applied Zeeman field, atom s injected in bare state |2/an}bracketri}htare the sole source of the magnetization that provides the positive feedback needed f or active oscillation. However, when the near-resonant Zeeman field is applied, it also allows atoms injected in the mF=±1 states (bare states |1/an}bracketri}htand|3/an}bracketri}ht) to contribute via a two-photon process. A dressed atom interpretation sho ws how these mF=±1 state atoms can become the dominant source of maser magnetization as the applied Zeema n field nears resonance. 5Viewed from the dressed atom basis, three factors contribut e to this interpretation. First, as shown in Fig. 4(a), the applied Zeeman field shifts the energies of the two dresse d levels |a/an}bracketri}htand|c/an}bracketri}htsymmetrically relative to level |b/an}bracketri}ht, which remains unperturbed. Second, near the Zeeman resonan ce, the ∆ F= 1 dipole coupling H2 4b=/an}bracketle{t4|ˆµ·HC|b/an}bracketri}ht2 vanishes while H2 4aandH2 4cbecome equally dominant, as shown in Fig. 4(b). Third, below resonance ( δ <0) the steady state population of state |a/an}bracketri}htis greater than that of state |c/an}bracketri}ht(ρaa> ρcc), while above resonance ( δ >0) the opposite is true ( ρcc> ρaa), as shown in Fig. 4(c). These dressed state population diffe rences arise from the fact that atoms in bare state |1/an}bracketri}htare injected into the maser while those in bare state |3/an}bracketri}htare not, under normal operation, so in the steady state ρ11> ρ33. For large negative Zeeman detunings, |a/an}bracketri}ht → |1/an}bracketri}htand|c/an}bracketri}ht → |3/an}bracketri}ht(see discussion following Eqn. 11). The opposite holds for positive detuning, where |a/an}bracketri}ht → |3/an}bracketri}htand|c/an}bracketri}ht → |1/an}bracketri}ht. These three ingredients combine to create the double resona nce shift of the maser frequency, shown in Fig. 4(d). For small negative Zeeman detunings ( |δ|<2γZ), the excess of ρaaoverρccand the relatively small size of H2 4bleads to maser oscillation primarily on the |a/an}bracketri}ht ↔ |4/an}bracketri}httransition. That is, atoms injected into the maser cavity in the bare state|1/an}bracketri}htcontribute significantly to the maser oscillation via a two- photon process: one Zeeman transition photon and one microwave photon within the resonant cavity linewidth. This|a/an}bracketri}ht ↔ |4/an}bracketri}httransition is at a slightly higher frequency than in the unperturbed (no applied field) maser, so the maser frequency is increased. Conversely, for small positive Zeeman detunings ( δ <2γZ), the maser oscillates preferentially on the |c/an}bracketri}ht ↔ |4/an}bracketri}httransition, and the maser frequency is decreased. For larger Zeeman detunings (positive or nega tive), the coupling of state |4/an}bracketri}htto unshifted dressed state |b/an}bracketri}htbecomes dominant, and the magnitude of the frequency shift i s reduced. For zero Zeeman detuning, dressed states |a/an}bracketri}htand|c/an}bracketri}htare equally populated in the steady state and the maser frequ ency shift exactly vanishes. Injection of an electronic polarization into the maser bulb is needed for the applied Zeeman field to induce a maser frequency shift. Since ωaandωcare spaced equally about the unperturbed maser frequency ωb, and since H2 4a=H2 4c, a necessary condition for a maser shift is a difference in the s teady state values of ρaaandρcc, which is a direct consequence of a difference in the injected populations of ba re states |1/an}bracketri}htand|3/an}bracketri}ht, i.e., a net electronic polarization. V. APPLICATION The double resonance hydrogen maser technique was original ly studied for use in autotuning the maser cavity [12]. In addition to the double resonance frequency shift, there i s a cavity pulling shift for a mistuned maser cavity, with magnitude dependent on the linewidth of the hyperfine transi tions, through the line-Q (see Eqn. 5). The applied Zeeman radiation depletes the population of bare state |2/an}bracketri}ht, thereby increasing the linewidth of the hyperfine transiti on. Andresen [12] showed that the cavity can be tuned to the atomi c frequency by modulating the hyperfine linewidth with applied Zeeman radiation and adjusting the cavity freq uency such that there is no modulation of the maser frequency. However, this method requires accurate setting of the applied Zeeman field to the Zeeman resonance (i.e. δ= 0). The double resonance technique can also be used for precisio n Zeeman spectroscopy in a hydrogen maser. Tra- ditionally, the Zeeman frequency in a hydrogen maser operat ing at low magnetic fields is measured by sweeping an audio frequency field through the Zeeman resonance and monit oring the maser power. The power is diminished near resonance with a Lorentzian shape with a width on the order of 1 Hz. Typical resolution of the Zeeman frequency with this technique is about 100 mHz. However, by utilizing t he sharp, antisymmetric profile of the double resonance frequency shift, we were able to determine the hydrogen Zeem an frequency with a resolution of about 1 mHz. Recently we used this double resonance technique in a search for Loren tz symmetry violation of the hydrogen atom’s electron and proton spin [19], motivated by a general extension of the standard model of elementary particle physics [20]. VI. CONCLUSION We used the dressed atom formalism to calculate the frequenc y shift of a hydrogen maser induced by an applied field near the F= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman transition frequency. The result is in excellent qu antitative agreement with previous bare atom basis calculations [12,15], within a sim plified spin-exchange approximation and with equal decay rates for all populations and coherences. The dressed atom p icture provides a simple physical understanding of the double resonance frequency shift, and in particular, the at omic polarization dependence of the frequency shift. The double resonance technique can be employed in precision spe ctroscopy of the hydrogen Zeeman frequency, e.g. in a test of Lorentz symmetry of the standard model [19,20]. 6VII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Mikhail Luken, Ed Mattison and Robert Vessot for use ful discussion. This work was supported by NASA grant NAGS-1434. MAH thanks NASA for support under the Gradu ate Student Researchers Program. [1] D. Kleppner, H.M. Goldenberg, and N.F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev .126, 603 (1962). [2] D. Kleppner, H.C. Berg, S.B. Crampton, N.F. Ramsey, R.F. C. Vessot, H.P. Peters, and J. Vanier, Phys. Rev. 138, A 972 (1965). [3] J. Vanier and C. Audoin, The Quantum Physics of Atomic Frequency Standards (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1989), Chap. 6. [4] E.N. Fortson, D. Kleppner, and N.F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. Le tt.13, 22 (1964). [5] S.B. Crampton, Phys. Rev. 158, 57 (1967). [6] P.F. Winkler, D. Kleppner, T. Myint, and F.G. Walther, Ph ys. Rev. A 5, 83 (1972). [7] R.L. Walsworth, I.F. Silvera, E.M. Mattison, and R.F.C. Vessot, Phys. Rev. A 46, 2495 (1992). [8] M.E. Hayden, M.D. Hurlimann, and W.N. Hardy, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1589 (1996). [9] R.F.C. Vessot et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 2081 (1980). [10] R.L. Walsworth, I.F. Silvera, E.M. Mattison, and R.F.C . Vessot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2599 (1990). [11] R.L. Walsworth and I.F. Silvera, Phys. Rev. A 42, 63 (1990). [12] H.G. Andresen, Z. Phys. 210, 113 (1968). [13] N.F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 100, 1191 (1955). [14] H.G. Andresen, Technical report, United States Army El ectronics Command (unpublished). [15] J.-Y. Savard, G. Busca, S. Rovea, M. Desaintfuscien, an d P. Petit, Can. J. Phys. 57, 904 (1979). [16] P.L. Bender, Phys. Rev. 132, 7154 (1963). [17] C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992), Chap. VI. [18] We have introduced a factor of1 2to the values for the Rabi frequencies |X24|,|X12|, and |X23|to account for the use of the rotating wave approximation. [19] D.F. Phillips, M.A. Humphrey, E.M. Mattison, R.F.C. Ve ssot, and R.L. Walsworth, to be published. [20] R. Bluhm, V.A. Kostelecky, and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Le tt.82, 2254 (1999). 7 frequency 1000 500 0 field [Gauss] mF = 1 mF = 0 mF = -1 mF = 0 νHFS 1 2 3 4 FIG. 1. Hydrogen hyperfine structure. A hydrogen maser oscil lates on the first-order magnetic field-independent |2/angbracketright ↔ |4/angbracketright hyperfine transition near 1420 MHz. The maser typically oper ates with a static field less than 1 mG. For these low field strengths, the two F= 1, ∆ mF= 1 Zeeman frequencies are nearly degenerate, and ν12≈ν23≈1 kHz. 8H2 dissociator hexapole magnet solenoidmagnetic shields microwave cavityquartz bulbto receiver B0 M H C Zeeman coils FIG. 2. Hydrogen maser schematic. The solenoid generates a w eak static magnetic field B0which defines a quantization axis inside the maser bulb. The microwave cavity field HC(dashed field lines) and the coherent magnetization Mof the atomic ensemble form the coupled actively oscillating system. 9-10010maser shift [mHz] -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Zeeman detuning [Hz]-10-50510 ∆ω / ω24 x 1012|X240| = 2.82 rad/s |X12 | = 1.02 rad/s γ1 = 4.13 rad/s γ2 = 2.80 rad/s γΖ = 2.30 rad/s r = 0.86 rad/s FIG. 3. Double resonance maser frequency shifts. The large o pen circles are data taken with an input beam of |1/angbracketrightand|2/angbracketright hydrogen atoms. These are compared with Eqn. 6 (full curve) u sing the parameter values shown. The values of |X12|and γZwere chosen to fit the data, while the remaining parameters we re independently measured. The experimental error of each measurement is smaller than the circle marking it. The elect ronic polarization dependence of the double resonance effec t is illustrated with the dotted data points: with an input beam o f|2/angbracketrightand|3/angbracketrightatoms, the shift is inverted. Note that the maser frequency shifts for the dotted points were scaled up by a fac tor of 10 since these data were acquired with a much weaker applied Zeeman field. The large variation of the maser freque ncy shift with Zeeman detuning near resonance, along with th e excellent maser frequency stability, allows the Zeeman fre quency ( ≈800 Hz) to be determined to about 3 mHz in a single scan of the double resonance such as the dotted data shown here (re quiring ≈20 minutes of data acquisition). 10-20-1001020ων / |X12| -2 -1 0 1 2ωa ωb ωc (a) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0interaction elements -2 -1 0 1 2H4a 2 = H4c2 H4b2 (b) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0populations -2 -1 0 1 2ρaa ρcc ρbb (c) -15-10-5051015∆ω / ω24 x 1012 -2 -1 0 1 2 normalized detuning δ/∆ωZ (d) FIG. 4. Calculated dressed atom quantities plotted against detuning of the applied Zeeman field (in units of Zeeman linew idth, ∆ωZ= 2γZ). The dotted, full, and dashed curves correspond to dressed states |a/angbracketright,|b/angbracketright, and |c/angbracketright, respectively. (a) Dressed atom frequencies normalized to the Zeeman Rabi frequency. (b) In teracton Hamiltonian matrix elements (squared) from equat ion (13) in units of /angbracketleft2|ˆµ·HC|4/angbracketright2. (c) Steady state populations of dressed states. (d) Fracti onal double resonance maser frequency shift. 11

Explanation of Faraday’s Experiment by the Time-Space Model of Wave Propagation Alexei Krouglov Sicon Video Corporation 1550 16th Ave., Bldg. F, 2nd Floor, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3K9, Canada Email: Alexei.Krouglov@SiconVideo.com This article represents the author’s personal view and not the view of Sicon Video Corporation. 2 ABSTRACT It is shown by the means of Time-Space Model of Wave Propagation the underlying phenomena of the alternating current’s origin in famous Faraday’s experi ment. Keywords : Electromagnetism, Wave Equation 3The Time-Space Model of Wave Propagation is applied to the description of fluctuation phenomena both in physics and in economics [1, 2, 3]. In this paper the Model is applied to the Faraday’s experiment of rotating a rectangular conducting loop in a magnetic field [4]. Magnetic field represents the energy’s level in the Model terminology. We choose two points on the opposite sides of a loop (see Fig. 1) and calculate the induced values of energy’s disturbances. Reference plane x2 x1 h l Fig. 1 Some other values are also shown on Fig. 1 as side h of the loop, distance l from loop’s center to the “reference plane”, which is perpendicular to the energy’s level gradient changes, and an angular speed ω of loop’s rotation. Then the distances from 1x and 2x to the reference plane are ( )i i thlx ϕω+ +=sin2, (1) where 2, 1=i and iϕ are the initial phases, πϕϕ+=12 . I suppose that the energy’s values in both points 1x and 2x are equal, 4()()txUtxU , ,2 1= (2) for t∀. I also assume that the energy’s level at the reference plane is equal everyw here ()t, 0Φ and is distinct from the energy’s level at rest 0Φ on some value 0∆Φ i.e. ()0 0, 0 ∆Φ+Φ=Φt . (3) Therefore we can calculate the energy’s levels in points 1x and 2x using [1], ()ix i e txµ−⋅∆Φ+Φ=Φ0 0, , (4) where 0>µ is some constant. Thus the energy’s disturbances at points 1x and 2x are ()ix i e txUµ−⋅∆Φ= ∆0, . (5) We can find the difference between the values of energy’s disturbances in points 1x and 2x respectively, ( ) ( ) ( )  + − ⋅∆Φ⋅= ∆− ∆− 1 0 2 1 sin2sinh 2, , ϕωµµthe txUtxUl. (6) Changing in time difference between values of the energy’s disturbances causes the energy’s disturbance propagation, which is manifested in the form of alternating current in the loop. 5References 1. A. Krouglov, “Dual Time-Space Model of Wave Propagation,” Working Paper physics/9909024, Los Alamos National Laboratory, September 1999 (available at http://xxx.lanl.gov ). 2. A. Krouglov, “Mathematical Model of Attraction and Repulsion Forces,” Working Paper physics/9912021, Los Alamos National Laboratory, December 1999 (available at http://xxx.lanl.gov ). 3. A. Krouglov, “Time-Space Model of Business Fluctuations,” Working Paper ewp- mac/0004008, Washington University in St. Louis, April 2000 (available at http://econwpa.wustl.edu ). 4. D.Cheng, “Field and Wave Electromagnetics,” 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company: Reading, MA, 1989.

1The Explanation of the New Astronomical Distance Data That has Resulted From Measurements of Type Ia Supernovae Lies Not In a Cosmological Constant and Accelerating Expansion; Rather, It Is Another Aspect / Effect of the General Exponential Decay of the Overall Universe. Roger Ellman Abstract In the Hubble model of the universe, the distance to far distant sources is determined from the redshift, from which the speed of regression, v, [the redshift being deemed due to its Doppler effect] and then the distance v ⋅ H [where H is called the Hubble constant] are determined. Recently it has become possible to determine the distance to Type Ia supernovae by other independent means.1,2 The intrinsic brightness [luminosity] of such supernovae is related to the pattern [light curve] of their flare up and back down, a process takingweeks. By comparing the intrinsic brightness, determined from that pattern, to theobserved brightness the distance can be determined from the inverse square law. Those new distance determinations exceed the Hubble distance by 10 - 15%. The explanation others propose is that an "antigravity effect" is accelerating the universe'expansion, which had hitherto been thought to be slowing down because of gravitation.That has led to their proposing reinstatement of Einstein's "cosmological constant", aterm in his equations introduced to account for gravitation not promptly collapsing theuniverse and which he disavowed upon Hubble's discovery of the expansion of theuniverse. And that has further led to their proposing some form of the Ancients' fifthessence, quintessence [the first four being earth, air, fire and water], to account for the"antigravity effect". Any "antigravity effect", regardless of its cause, would have the effect of counteracting ordinary gravitation. Inasmuch as one of the major current problems incosmology is to identify more gravitation to account for the cosmos's large scale structureand galaxies' centrifugal force, any "antigravity effect" to act as the cause of accelerationwould not appear to fit with the rest of the cosmological situation. An alternative explanation is presented -- the general exponential decay of the overall universe, which has been analyzed and developed in several papers. 3,4,5,6 The universal decay accounts for the greater distances and the necessary cosmic energywithout the challenge to theory and to reasonableness that acceleration, its unknowncause, and a cosmological constant involve. Roger Ellman, The-Origin Foundation, Inc. 320 Gemma Circle, Santa Rosa, CA 95404, USA RogerEllman@The-Origin.org2Explanation of the New Astronomical Distance Data That has Resulted From Measurements of Type Ia Supernovae Lies Not In a "Cosmological Constant" and Accelerating Expansion; Rather, It Is Another Aspect / Effect of the General Exponential Decay of the Overall Universe. Roger Ellman Background of the Problem [While unnecessary for astronomers and astrophysicists this review is included for the benefit of other scientists, who may not be familiar with the details of thedevelopment, details which are essential to understanding the issues.] The, for years generally accepted, Hubble astronomical model of the universe is of a uniformly expanding cosmos in which all galaxies are moving apart so that theirspeed away from us is proportional to their distance from us, the constant ofproportionality being called the Hubble Constant, H. Until recently the distance to far distant such bodies has been determined by measuring the redshift, deemed a Dopplereffect. From that one obtains the speed of recession, v, and then the distance v ⋅ H. Recently it has become possible to determine the distance to far distant galaxies by an alternative independent means based on observations of Type Ia supernovae inthose galaxies. 1,2 It has been found that the intrinsic brightness [luminosity] of such supernovae is related to the pattern [light curve] of their flare up and back down, aprocess taking weeks overall. By comparing the intrinsic brightness, as determined fromthat pattern, to the observed brightness the distance can be determined from the inversesquare law. Those new distance determinations indicate distances exceeding the Hubble model distance by 10% to 15%. The interpretation of that result as proposed by theresearchers who developed the data and others is that some "antigravity effect" isaccelerating the universe's expansion, which expansion had hitherto been thought to beslowing down because of gravitation. That "antigravity effect", by default, would have tobe a property of the empty space, the vacuum, of the universe since it is certainly not aproperty of the matter. That line of thought has led to the reinstatement of Einstein's "cosmological constant" a term in his equations that he introduced to account for the universe notpromptly collapsing due to gravitation and which he later disavowed upon Hubble'sdiscovery of the expansion of the universe. Those implications are so unsettling to theory and to reasonableness that the data had been initially deemed in error. As a result there have been extensive analyses ofsources of error and measurements have been taken on a large enough number of Type Iasupernovae to be statistically significant all with the conclusion that the new distancemeasurements are valid and that theory must be adjusted accordingly. 1,2 But, there is an explanation of the data alternative to that of accelerating expansion, one that carries considerably less challenge to theory and negligible challengeto reasonableness -- the general exponential decay of the overall universe, which has beenanalyzed and developed in several papers. 3,4,5,6 Exponential decay is found throughout nature so that overall decay of the universe is not unreasonable.3The universal decay accounts for the observed greater distances [and shows that they are actually greater than the reported measurements indicate] and provides thenecessary cosmic energy without employing an arbitrary "cosmological constant", a new"quintessential" substance, and "an antigravity effect", which are otherwise unknown,unsupported by theory, and contrary to all other data and experience. The General Universal Decay The theory of the general exponential decay of the overall universe is derived and developed in The Origin and Its Meaning .6 The decay is of the same form as the myriad exponential decays found throughout nature because all such decays are aspects of thegeneral solution to the 2 nd order linear differential equation with constant coefficients. The universal decay is decay of the quantities that we refer to as the fundamentalconstants, c, h, q, G, and so forth, essentially a decay of the fundamental substance(s) of material reality. The values of these fundamental constants are the same everywhere in the universe at any instant of time. The decay means that they are everywhere uniformly andconsistently exponentially decaying with time. The requirement that the laws of physicsand their fundamental constants be the same everywhere in the universe [Einstein's"invariance"] includes within it the decay processes acting consistently everywhere. These fundamental constants interact through the various physical laws of nature and, therefore, the decay of each constant must be consistent with the decays of all of theothers. Analysis of all of the implications of that requirement shows that the decay is ofthe length dimensional component of those constants. That is, from among thefundamental dimensional components length [L], mass [M] and time [T], it is length [L] that is in decay. That develops as follows. The decay being an exponential function the independent variable of which is time, t, as in for example equation 1, it cannot be the time dimensional component, [T], that is decaying. (1) -t/τ c(t) = c0∙ε Furthermore, mass and time are closely interrelated as in equation 2, (2) h·f = E = m·c2 so that if mass, [M], were to decay it would imply that frequency decays and that time, [T], the inverse of frequency, inversely decays, which the independent variable cannot do. That leaves only the length component, [L] to be the dependent variable in the decay. Equation 2 also illustrates another point. Planck's constant, h, appears in the equation with an exponent of 1 whereas the speed of light, c, appears with an exponent of 2. For the two decays, that of h and that of c, to be consistent their time constants must be different. Planck's constant, h, must decay twice as rapidly as the speed of light, c; its time constant, τh, must be half that of light, τc. That is, (3) [ -t/τ ]1 [ -t/τ ]2 [ ε h] = [ε c] for consistency of the decays, ∴∴∴∴ τh = 0.5 · τc4The time constant of the general exponential decay of the overall universe is derived and calculated in The Origin and Its Meaning.6 The value for c, the "fundamental" value as compared to that for, for example, h = 1/2 of that for c, is (4) τc = 3.57532·1017 s = about 11.3 billion years "c" dimensions are L1/T The values for other constant's decays are the appropriate multiple or sub-multiple of the value for c. For example: (5) τh = 1/2·τc = 1.78766·1017 s = about 5.65 billion years "h" dimensions are M· L2/T τG = 1/3·τc = 1.19177·1017 s = about 3.77 billion years "G" dimensions are L3/M·T2 The first definitive experimental observation of this decay [although it remained unrecognized at the time] was in the tracking of the Pioneer 10 and 11 satellites. Theobservations were reported in 1998 in Indication, from Pioneer 10/11, Galileo, and Ulysses Data, of an Apparent Anomalous, Weak, Long-Range Acceleration. 7 and were further analyzed in 1999 in The Apparent Anomalous, Weak, Long-Range Acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11.8 These reported that a weak long-range acceleration towards the Sun has been observed in the Pioneer 10 and 11 satellites for which no satisfactoryexplanation had been obtained in spite of diligent efforts by a number of parties, forwhich reason it was described as "anomalous". The interpretation of the anomalous acceleration as being a direct effect of the universal decay was presented in Exponential Decay of the Overall Universe is the Cause of "The Apparent Anomalous, Weak, Long-Range Acceleration of [the spacecraft]Pioneer 10 and 11" . 5 Decay in the gravitational acceleration, aG, acting on the satellites and due to the Sun means that aG was greater in the past, which means that the satellites were slowed more in the past than we now would expect in terms of the current value of aG. That effect is the "anomalous acceleration" toward the Sun. The time constant for this decay, τa,G, is as given in equation 6. (6) τa,G = τc = 3.57532·1017 s = about 11.3 billion years "a" dimensions are L1/T2 For that the corresponding [that is the decay-related] acceleration toward the Sun is 8.38505·10-8 cm/s2 (the observed value was reported as 8.5·10-8 cm/s2 including other secondary effects) and the anomalous frequency drift, stated as clock acceleration, is 2.79695·10-18 s/s2 (the observed value was 2.8·10-18 s/s2). While this was the first definitive, although not then recognized, experimental observation of the decay, every redshift measurement is a partial such observation. Thatis, the decay in the speed of light, c, means that the light from far distant sources, which we now observe a long time after it was emitted, was emitted at a larger value of c than the value we know now. That greater speed means that the wavelengths all are longer,are redshifted as we perceive them. Furthermore, the more distant the source the earlier its light was emitted and the less decayed is the light's speed. That means that the greater the [decay-caused] redshiftthe more distant the source is. That relationship is non-linear as is the exponential decayfunction and unlike the Hubble model linear relationship.5However, the sources of such light are, nevertheless, moving away from us so that there is also some Doppler effect. The redshifts that we observe are a combination ofDoppler and decay effects. The analysis of the universal decay in The Origin and Its Meaning. 6 addresses the problem of determining what part of the observed redshifts is due to the Doppler effect and what part to decay. The results are that the Doppler-caused part of the redshifts could not be more than 10% of the total redshift and is more likely on the order of only 1% or less. The remainder of the observed amounts of redshift, 90-99% of them,are due to the universal decay of the speed of light. The reasons for this are as follows. At the Big Bang the material of the universe was thrust rapidly outward in all directions. Since then the mutual gravitational attraction of all of that material has been slowing it all down. The amount of the gravitational slowing is inversely proportional to the square of the distant between the mutually attracting bodies. Starting at a very largespeed the distance of separation increased rapidly, meaning that the slowing was rapidly reduced. Therefore, most of the slowing, most of the speed loss, had to occur early after the "Big Bang". A very large part of the slowing must have taken place by the time the earliest galaxies formed, about 2 1/2 to 3 billion years after the "Big Bang". Even if the initial speeds of those earliest galaxies immediately after the Big Bang were almost the speed of light, c, their speeds 21/2 to 3 billion years later could not have been more than 1/10 as much, c/10, and more likely were on the order of c/100, or less. Since of the observed amounts of redshift, 90-99% is due to the universal decay of the speed of light it is within the precision of the Type Ia supernovae data to deem the redshifts to be dominantly due to universal decay. Application to the Type Ia Supernovae Observations The values of the fundamental constants c and h in the light, emitted long ago, that we now observe from a far distant astronomical source are much less decayed thanour local here, now values of those constants. That is, the light travels at a much greaterspeed than the c that we know and its photons carry much greater energy for each same frequency than the E = h·f amounts that we know, meaning that they appear more luminous to us. Both constants are actually greater than, greater relative to, the values,the standards that we inherently use, directly experience, and in terms of which weinterpret that ancient light -- the values to which those constants have currently decayed,"our" values. Because that light that we observe from a far distant astronomical source is traveling faster, its source is farther away from us than we deem based on our understoodspeed of light. For example, the situation for a source the light from which is 5 billionyears old when it reaches us is as follows. (7) As we perceive it: distance = [age] · [our value of c] = 5 billion (our) light years As it really is: distance = [same age] · [155% of our value of c] = [155% of same age] · [our value of c] = 7.75 billion (our) light years6That would tend to make the apparent, the observed, luminosity of the source appear less to us by the factor [5/7.75]2 = 0.416 because of the inverse square effect. However, that same light that we observe from its far distant astronomical sourcealso carries a larger value of Planck's constant which makes its intrinsic luminositygreater. For example, the situation for the same source the light from which is 5 billionyears old when it reaches us is as follows. (8) As we perceive it: luminosity = per our Planck's constant As it really is: Luminosity = 242% of per our Planck's constant = 2.42 · [As we expect it] That would tend to make the apparent, the observed, luminosity of the source appear greater to us by the factor 2.42. The combined effect of the two, the reduction due to greater distance, greater c, and the enhancement due to larger Planck's constant, h, is for the present example as follows. (9) Net combined effect on perceived luminosity = = 0.416 · 2.42= 1.00 There is not net change in the perceived brightness, the inverse square effect of greater distance being exactly cancelled by the effect of greater intrinsic luminosity. However, in the case of the Type Ia supernovae experiments, the subject of this paper, the situation is not the same. In those experiments, as reported in the papers1,2, the relationship between intrinsic luminosity and the light curve [flare up and back downpattern] of Type Ia supernovae was calibrated by observations on relatively near sources.It is that calibration which is in error, error caused by the [unknown to the experimenters]effects of the general universal decay of the constants c and h. That error develops as follows. The distances were determined by means of data on Cepheid variable sources. As described in the paper1, "The relative luminosities of this "training set" of SNe Ia were calibrated with independent distance indicators (Tonry 1991; Pierce 1994). Theabsolute SN Ia luminosities were measured from Cepheid variables populating the host galaxies (Saha, et al. 1994, 1997)." [Again for the benefit of non-specialists in astronomy or astrophysics] Cepheid variables are stars that vary in brightness with regular periods ranging from less than 1 to about 100days. In 1912 a relationship [since improved] between the period and the brightness ofCepheids was discovered. Using Cepheids near enough that their distance could bemeasured by triangulation, the brightness - period relationship for Cepheids wascalibrated. With that calibration, the distance to more distant Cepheids could bedetermined by comparing the observed brightness with the intrinsic brightness calculatedfrom the Cepheid's period and applying the inverse square law. The calibration of Cepheids by triangulation means that the source stars were so near that the [very large time constant] universal exponential decay had negligible effect -the source stars were essentially contemporary. Therefore, an intrinsic brightness determined from the Cepheid period contains negligible universal decay effect. A distant Cepheid has a greater intrinsic brightness as compared to a quite near but otherwise identical Cepheid because the h of the light from the distant Cepheid is larger than the h of the light from the quite near Cepheid. The distant Cepheid's actual7distance is also greater because the c of its light is greater. Its light has traveled the time corresponding to the redshift but at a greater speed so that its source's distance must havebeen greater. As in the hypothetical example of equations 7 - 9, the two effects cancelout. Its observed brightness is unaffected by the decay. For the calibration of the Type Ia Supernovae light curves by observations on relatively near sources at redshifts in the range z = 0.01 to 0.08 the actual distances to those sources were as follows. (10) The relationship between the effect on the observed wavelength due to exponential decay vs the Doppler effect is as follows [neglecting the minor residual Doppler part in the exponential decay case]. Exponential Decay Doppler Effect λt=T -T/τ λobs v=V = ε 1 + z = λt=0 λv=0 source where λt=T corresponds to λv=0 source λt=0 corresponds to λobs v=V therefore λt=0 +T/τ 1 + z = = ε λt=T ln[1 + z] = T/τ T = τ·ln[1 + z] = Distance in Light-time The relationship between the initial and final values of a quantity, for example c(t), that exponentially decays over a time interval, T, with a decay constant, τ, is as follows. (11) -T/τ +T/τ c(T) = c(0) ∙ε or c(0) = c(T) ∙ε (12) For the relatively near sources used for calibrating the Type Ia Supernovae light curve vs luminosity. Eq 10: T = D1 @ c(T)≡ D 2 @ c(0) ≡ Actual D 2/ z τ·ln[1+z] Current c [Less-Decayed] c D1 0.010 0.11 0.11 0.11 1.01 0.015 0.17 0.17 0.17 1.01(5) 0.020 0.23 0.23 0.23 1.020.025 0.28 0.28 0.29 1.02(5) 0.030 0.34 0.34 0.35 1.03 0.035 0.39 0.39 0.40 1.03(5)0.040 0.45 0.45 0.47 1.040.045 0.50 0.50 0.52 1.04(5) 0.050 0.56 0.56 0.59 1.05 0.055 0.61 0.61 0.64 1.05(5)0.060 0.66 0.66 0.70 1.060.065 0.72 0.72 0.77 1.06(5) 0.070 0.77 0.77 0.82 1.07 0.075 0.82 0.82 0.88 1.07(5)0.080 0.88 0.88 0.95 1.088where: τ = 11.3 billion light years T is in billions of yearsD is in billions of light years and: for astro-ph 9805201 1for astro-ph 98121332 typical z = 0.039 typical z = 0.049 typical T = 0.44 typical T = 0.55 The corresponding data and calculations for the distant sources, which are the ultimate subject of the papers at issue1,2 and of the theoretical interpretation being corrected, are as follows. (13) For the distant sources being investigated. Eq 10: T = D1 @ c(T)= D 2 @ c(0) = Actual D 2/ z τ·ln[1+z] Current c [Less-Decayed] c D1 0.35 3.42 3.42 4.62 1.35 0.40 3.84 3.84 5.38 1.40 0.45 4.24 4.24 6.15 1.45 0.50 4.62 4.62 6.93 1.500.55 5.00 5.00 7.75 1.550.60 5.36 5.36 8.58 1.60 0.65 5.71 5.71 9.42 1.65 0.70 6.05 6.05 10.29 1.700.75 6.38 6.38 11.17 1.750.80 6.70 6.70 12.06 1.800.85 7.01 7.01 12.97 1.85 where: for astro-ph 9805201 1for astro-ph 98121332 typical z = 0.51 typical z = 0.41 typical T = 4.69 typical T = 3.92 To trace the effects of the universal exponential decay as it causes deviations of results in observations of distant Type Ia Supernovae from as they would otherwise be inthe absence of the decay the effects on the cases corresponding to the above cited typicalvalues are analyzed below. The actual investigations presented in the papers 1,2 were of a statistically significant number of such determinations on specific Type Ia Supernovae,the set approximately averaging the "typical" values. The analysis process is as follows. A. The effect of c decay on the "training" Cepheid A Cepheid variable is identified in the host galaxy of one of the relatively near "training" Type Ia Supernovae and its distance is determined according to the usualCepheid distance scale. That is, its intrinsic brightness is determined from its variationperiod and its observed brightness is noted. From those its distance is inferred from theinverse square relationship. That distance to the Cepheid is then assigned or designated as the known distance to the "training" Sn Ia. In the light from that Cepheid both its c and its h are greater than our contemporary values. The greater c means a greater distance and greater inverse-square dimming of observed brightness. The greater h means greater photon energy and an enhancement of observed brightness. As in thehypothetical example of equations 7 - 9, the two effects exactly cancel. Theresulting observed brightness of the Cepheid is the same as would be the case in9the absence of universal decay. The resulting distance determination to the Cepheid is, in that sense, unaffected by the universal decay. However, from equation 12, at values typical of those reported in the papers1,2 and so noted in equation 12, that distance is moderately incorrect. The correct distance to the Cepheid [due to a moderately greater value of c] is about 4.5% greater. The intrinsic brightness of the typical "training" Sn Ia, inferred from its observed brightness and the Cepheid-determined distance, will be anoverstatement [due to that cause, alone] of its actual intrinsic brightness by about9.6% because it is inferred using a distance about 4.5% too small. That is, theaffect of the distance on brightness is as the inverse square of the distance and [1.0/(1.0 − 0.045)]2 = 1.096 …. The effect of c decay causes the Cepheid distance scale to understate the Cepheid's distance and, therefore, the "training" Type Ia Supernova's distance by about 4.5%. It,therefore overstates the "training" Sn Ia's intrinsic brightness by about 9.6%. B - The effect of h decay on the "training" Type Ia Supernova The observed brightness of the "training" Sn Ia is noted. That in conjunction with its distance [from Step A] makes it possible to calculate the intrinsic brightness ofthe "training" Sn Ia using the inverse square relationship. That intrinsic brightness iscorrelated with the "training" Sn Ia's light pattern, which completes the calibration. As in the hypothetical example of equations 7 - 9, the combined effects of the c decay and the h decay on the observed brightness of the Sn Ia exactly cancel; the observed brightness is independent of the decay. However, whileboth distance and intrinsic brightness affect observed brightness, distance hasnothing to do with intrinsic brightness; the intrinsic brightness simply is what itis; it is intrinsic to the source. [The determining of intrinsic brightness in somecases by inference from observed brightness and distance is not the same thing.] The Sn Ia's intrinsic brightness is greater because its h is greater and greater h means greater photon energy, which enhances brightness. This excess brightness is calculated using τh = 0.5 · τc = 5.65 billion light years. Per equation 11 and using T = 0.50 [half-way between the equation 12 typical values], the result is as follows. (14) +T/τ +0.50/5.65 c(0)/c(T) = ε = ε = 1.11 The effect of h decay results in the "training" Sn Ia's observed brightness being about 11% more, due to this effect alone, than if there were no such decay. C - The resulting "training" calibration The calibration of intrinsic brightness versus light curve for Type Ia Supernovae obtained from the "training" set overstates the intrinsic brightness by about 9.6% due todistance deviation, Step A, and by about 11% due to brightness deviation, Step B,combined about 1.096 · 1.11 = 1.21 , a 21% brightness overstatement. D - The distant Type Ia Supernova independent distance determination Armed with the Sn Ia Light Curve vs Intrinsic Brightness relationship, the investigation shifts from the "training" to the far distant Sn Ia sources of interest. Adistant Type Ia Supernovae is studied and its intrinsic brightness is developed based onits light curve. Its observed brightness is noted. Based on those two datums its distanceis inferred from the inverse square relationship.10In the light from that Sn Ia both its c and its h are greater than our contemporary values. The greater c means a greater distance and greater inverse-square dimming of observed brightness. The greater h means greater photon energy and an enhancement of observed brightness. As in thehypothetical example of equations 7 - 9, the two effects exactly cancel. Theobserved brightness is not affected by the decay in that sense. However, the intrinsic brightness, obtained from the light curve, is overstated about 21% per Step C. Per the inverse square relationship, thatcorresponds to the Sn Ia appearing to be at a greater distance by the square rootof 1.21, about 1.10, or about 10 % farther away then expected. E - The distant Type Ia Supernova "expected" distance determination The "expected" distance, is determined by identifying a Cepheid variable in the host galaxy of the Sn Ia and attributing its distance to the Sn Ia, also. In this case nodeviation due to the universal decay is applicable because the "expected" distance meansthat found per the usual methods and with no knowledge of the decay. F - Overall results The "expected" distance being unchanged and the light curve derived distance being overstated by about 10% results in a total distance deviation of about 10 %. That is what accounts for, what produces the observation reported in the abstract to astro-ph 98052011 that "The distances of the high-redshift SNe Ia are, on average, 10% to 15% farther than expected...." Because the effects of c and of h decay combined leave observed brightness unchanged it would appear that the decay has no effect on the observation of Sn Ia light curves. Theanalysis of the light curves involves several sophisticated aspects so that the possibility ofa decay effect cannot be ruled out. Actual Distances and Conclusion From equation 13 at values typical of those reported in the papers1,2 and so noted in equation 13, the correct distance [due to a somewhat greater value of c] is actually about 45% greater than the expected. These actual greater distances [and, of course,the reported 10% to 15% greater distances] do not result from acceleration of expansion,nor an "anti gravity effect", nor a cosmological constant. Rather the Big Bang productparticles were not limited to our value of the speed of light. The limit back then wasmuch larger. If the present age of the universe is about the 18 billion years [somewhatover 1½ time constants of the speed of light decay] calculated in The Origin and Its Meaning. 6 based on the universal decay, then the original value of c was 4.92 times greater than today's value, as follows. (15) +T/τ +18/11.3 c(0) = c(T) ∙ε = c ∙ε = 4.92·c For ages of 15 and 10 billion light years, which represent some of the extant estimates by physicists, that result is an original c that was 3.77 or 2.42 times greater than today, respectively. While the universal decay accounts for the Type Ia Supernovae observations in a reasonable way, the concept proposed by others that expansion of the universe isaccelerating, rather than decelerating as has been thought, has problems of consistencywith the rest of cosmology. Any "antigravity effect" to account for acceleration ofexpansion of the universe, regardless of its cause, would have the additional effect ofcounteracting ordinary gravitation. Inasmuch as one of the major current problems in11cosmology is to identify more gravitation to account for the cosmos's large scale structure and galaxies' centrifugal force, any "antigravity effect" to act as the cause of accelerationwould not appear to fit with the rest of the cosmological situation. The greater distances and greater energy disclosed by the Sne Ia studies are the result of greater initial and then decaying speeds and the much greater values of Planck'sconstant at the time of the Big Bang and during decay after. Actions Needed to Complete the Verification of the Universal Decay The universal decay can be verified and further investigated by conducting two experiments set forth in The Origin and Its Meaning6; the measurement of the value of each of the two fundamental constants, c and h, directly as they are in the light from far distant astronomical sources. The measurements must be of the actual light emitted longago from a far distant astronomical source, not local, just emitted, light. The measurements must directly measure the constant sought; they cannot be a measurement of other quantities with the calculation of the fundamental constant using laws of physics relating the quantities. For example, in the usual determinations of thevalues of the various fundamental constants Planck's constant is not directly measured.Rather its value is inferred from other measurements [e.g. the Rydberg constant] andcalculated via other formulations [e.g. the fine structure constant]. Such indirectprocedures may not give correct results in the present experiments. The expected results of the experiments are given in Figure 1, below, which gives the multiples of our contemporary value of the constants c and h that are expectedto be found in light that was emitted at various times in the past. Measuring The Speed of Light, c Modern measurements of the speed of light are done by measuring certain frequencies and wavelengths that are measurable with very great precision, c being the product of a frequency and its related wavelength. To measure the speed of ancient lightfrom far distant sources the product of frequency and wavelength is useless. We alreadyknow that the wavelength is significantly different from that in our local light, thedifference being the redshift. If that redshift were entirely due to universal decay then thefrequency-wavelength product would give the correct speed, but at least some of theredshift is due to the Doppler effect [on the order of 1% - 10%]. Figure 1 12The data of interest is a comparison of the c in ancient light with that in contemporary light. That can be determined by an interferometer type measurement suchas those of Michaelson / Pease and Pearson using the Foucault method. In thoserevolving mirrors or a toothed wheel were used to break a monochromatic [singlefrequency] light beam into segments. The beam was then split into two beams whichwere directed over two different paths of known length and then recombined. If the speedof travel over the two paths were the same then the recombination would produce aperfect overlap of the waves, but if it were different the difference would show in theresulting interference wave pattern. To compare far distant ancient light against contemporary local light the interference must be generated between a single frequency of the ancient light [asselected by a spectroscope, one of the lines of the distant source's line spectrum beingselected] and a beam of local light [the same frequency line as in the ancient light spectrum being spectroscopically selected], no beam splitting being involved. Asindicated in the sample data above, the speed difference of the two light beams will belarge and the resulting interference pattern will be accordingly. Measuring Planck's Constant, h. Planck's Constant, h, can be directly measured using the photoelectric effect. Figure 2, below, illustrates the photoelectric effect and its relationship to Planck'sconstant. While the accuracy using the photoelectric effect is not nearly as good as thatprovided by other less direct means, the method is quite sufficiently accurate for theaccuracies involved for the present purposes. The lines in the figure [which are straightlines] can be plotted from as little as two data points for any one substance [of courseaccuracy improves with a greater number of data points and interpolation among them]. Each data point is obtained by shining light [in the present situation the light must be from a far distant astronomical source] of a single frequency [as selected by aspectroscope, one of the lines of the source's line spectrum being selected] on aphotosensitive surface that emits photoelectrons [the selected line must be of a frequencygreater than the cut-off frequency, e.g. f 1 or f2, for the particular photosensitive substance being used]. Figure 2 Normally in the use of the photoelectric effect the objective is to readily collect a current of photoelectrons so that the collection anode is set at a positive electricalpotential relative to the photoelectron source, the photosensitive surface on which thelight is shined. [Of course, the entire structure must be in a vacuum for the photoelectronsto be free to travel without the interference of a relatively dense gas.] In the present experiment the collection anode is set negative relative to the photoelectron source, that negative potential being adjustable. Then the negative potentialis made progressively less negative until the first, initial photoelectron current is detected.That potential is the energy of the most energetic photoelectron produced by the 13particular frequency of the light being used [the photoelectrons emitted at lesser energies having been freed from the photosensitive surface with the same high energy but havinglost some within the material before becoming free]. The data point is the energy and thefrequency. As indicated in the figure, Planck's constant is the slope of the resulting line(s), which develops as follows. The energy of a photon of light is given by (16) E = h·f where: E is the energy, h is Planck's constant, and f is the frequency of the particular photon. The initial energy datum is the electric retarding potential and must be converted to the units of Planck's constant times frequency as required for the E of equation 16. That done, then the slope of the line in the figure is (17)Energy/frequency = h·f/f = h, Planck's constant. This measurement performed on light from distant astronomical sources will result in values for Planck's constant quite noticeably larger than our domestic value, thedifference being the decay that has taken place since the time the sample light wasoriginally emitted at its distant source. References [1] A.G. Riess, A.V. Filippenko, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti, A. Diercks, P.M. Garnavich, R.L. Gilliland, C.J. Hogan, S. Jha, R.P. Kirshner, B. Leibundgut, M.M. Phillips, D.Reiss, B.P. Schmidt, R.A. Schommer, R.C. Smith, J. Spyromilio, C. Stubbs, N.B.Suntzeff, J. Tonry, Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant , Los Alamos National Laboratory Eprint Archive at http://xxx.lanl.gov, astro-ph/9805201. [2] S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R.A. Knop, P. Nugent, P.G. Castro, S. Deustua, S. Fabbro, A. Goobar, D.E. Groom, I.M. Hook, A.G. Kim, M.Y. Kim, J.C.Lee, N.J. Nunes, R. Pain, C.R. Pennypacker, R. Quimby, C. Lidman, R.S. Ellis, M.Irwin, R.G. McMahon, P. Ruiz-Lapuente, N. Walton, B. Schaefer, B.J. Boyle, A.V.Filppenko, T. Matheson, A.S. Fruchter, N. Panagia, H.J.M. Newberg, W.J. Couch, Measurements of Ω and Λ From 42 High-Redshift Supernovae , Los Alamos National Laboratory Eprint Archive at http://xxx.lanl.gov, astro-ph/9812133. [3] R. Ellman, A Conjecture Concerning Red Shifts , Los Alamos National Laboratory Eprint Archive at http://xxx.lanl.gov, physics/9808051. [4] R. Ellman, Further Analysis of the Universal Decay Suggested In "A Conjecture Concerning Red Shifts" , Los Alamos National Laboratory Eprint Archive at http://xxx.lanl.gov, physics/9809029. [5] R. Ellman, Exponential Decay of the Overall Universe is the Cause of "The Apparent Anomalous, Weak, Long-Range Acceleration of [the spacecraft] Pioneer10 and 11" , Los Alamos National Laboratory Eprint Archive at http://xxx.lanl.gov, physics/9906031. [6] This paper is based on development in R. Ellman, The Origin and Its Meaning , The- Origin Foundation, Inc., http://www.The-Origin.org, 1997, in which thedevelopment is more extensive and the collateral issues are developed. [It may bedownloaded from http://www.The-Origin.org/download.htm].14[7] J. D. Anderson, P. A. Laing, E. L. Lau, A. S. Liu, M. M. Nieto, and S. G. Turyshev, Indication, from Pioneer 10/11, Galileo, and Ulysses Data, of an Apparent Anomalous, Weak, Long-Range Acceleration , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2858 (1998), Los Alamos National Laboratory Eprint Archive at http://xxx.lanl.gov, gr-qc/9808081. [8] J. D. Anderson, P. A. Laing, E. L. Lau, A. S. Liu, M. M. Nieto, and S. G. Turyshev, The Apparent Anomalous, Weak, Long-Range Acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11 , Los Alamos National Laboratory Eprint Archive at http://xxx.lanl.gov, gr- qc/9903024.

arXiv:physics/0007059v1 [physics.ins-det] 17 Jul 2000Lorentz angle measurements in irradiated silicon detector s between 77 K and 300 K W. de Boera, V. Bartscha, J. Bola, A. Dierlamma, E. Grigorieva, F. Haulera, S. Heisinga, O. Herza, L. Jungermanna, R. Ker¨ anena, M. Koppenh¨ ofera, F. R¨ odereraand T. Schneiderb aInstitut f¨ ur Experimentelle Kernphysik, Universit¨ at Ka rlsruhe, Germany bInstitut f¨ ur Technische Physik, Forschungszentrum Karls ruhe, Germany Presented by: W. de Boer Future experiments are using silicon detectors in a high rad iation environment and in high magnetic fields. The radiation tolerance of silic on improves by cooling it to temperatures below 180 K. At low temperatures the mobil ity increases, which leads to larger deflections of the charge carriers by th e Lorentz force. A good knowledge of the Lorentz angle is needed for design and operation of silicon detectors. We present measurements of the Lorentz a ngle between 77 K and 300 K before and after irradiation with a primary beam of 2 1 MeV protons.1 Introduction Future collider experiments need stronger magnetic fields f or momentum measurements, be- cause of the higher particle momenta. In high fields the drift ing charge carriers generated by traversing particles are deflected significantly by the Lore ntz force e /vectorvx/vectorB, where /vectorv is the drift velocity and /vectorB the magnetic field. As advantage of such a deflection one can c onsider the im- proved charge sharing between the readout strips, which can improve the resolution for a given readout pitch. On the other hand the charge sharing worsens t he double track resolution and the signal-to-noise ratio. As is well known[1], the drift mo bility of electrons is larger than the hole mobility, thus resulting in a considerably larger Lore ntz shift for electrons than for holes. Therefore, p+nn+silicon detector with charge integration on both sides, sho w much less of an effect of the magnetic field on the p-side, where the holes are c ollected, than on the n-side, where the electrons are collected. Typical position resolutions of silicon strip detectors ar e in the order of µm, while the Lorentz shifts in a 4 T magnetic field reach 200 µm for electrons in a 300 µm thick detector. Therefore, these shifts have to be accounted for and an interesting ques tion is the dependence of the Lorentz shift on the irradiation dose. For an LHC experiment , where the dose reaches over 1014particles per cm2, the change in drift mobility due to the defects introduced b y the radiation damage, might result in a continuous change of the Lorentz shift, and thus of the calibration of the detector. In order to increase the radiation tolerance of silicon dete ctors two scenarios were found by the RD48– and RD39–collaborations: either the silicon wafe r has to be oxygen enriched[2] or the temperature of operation should be around 130 K[3]. At lo wer temperatures the mobility of both electrons and holes increases rapidly ( µH∝T−2.4) and Lorentz angles for electrons up to 80◦were observed in a 4 T magnetic field. In this paper we study the Lorentz angles of both electrons an d holes in magnetic fields up to 8 T and temperatures between 77 and 300 K. This is done before an d after irradiating a detector with 21 MeV protons up to a fluence of 1013/cm2, which equals 2 .8·10131 MeV equivalent neutrons. 2 Experimental setup The Lorentz angle Θ Lunder which charge carriers are deflected in a magnetic field p erpendi- cular to the electric field is defined by: tan(Θ L) =∆x d=µHB=rHµB (1) 2where the drift length corresponds to the detector thicknes sdand the shift of the center of charge is ∆ x(see Fig. 1). The Hall mobility is denoted by µH, the conduction mobility by µ. The Hall mobility differs from the conduction mobility by the Hall scattering factor rH. This factor describes the influence of the magnetic field on the mea n scattering time of carriers of different energy and velocity[4]. The Hall scattering fac tor has a value of 1 .15 at room temperature and decreases towards 1 .0 with temperature [5]. On the other hand, the mobility increases with temperature proportional to T−2.42[6]. The Lorentz angle can be measured by injecting charges at the surface on one side and observing the drift through the detector by measuring this charge on th e opposite side(see Fig. 1). Charges were generated by injecting light with a wavelength of λ= 650 nm, which has an absorption length of 3 mum at 300 K and 10 µm at 77 K. One type of carriers immediately recombines at the electrode, whereas the other drifts towards the oppos ite side. The Lorentz angle for electrons and holes can be measured separately by either inj ecting laser light on the n- or p-side. For our measurements the JUMBO magnet from the Forschungsze ntrum Karlsruhe[7] was used in aB= 10 T configuration with a warm bore of 7 cm. A flow of cold nitrog en gas through the warm bore allowed the detectors to be cooled to temperatu res between 77 and 300 K. The detectors were double sided “baby” detectors of approxi mately 2x1 cm from the HERA–B production by Sintef. The strip pitch is 50 micron on the p–si de and 80 micron on the n–side; the strips on opposite sides are oriented at an angle of 90 deg ree with respect to each other; the strip directions are defined as x- and y-direction, while the E-field is in the z-direction. The B-field, perpendicular to the electric field, has to be in the x -y plane, but cannot be oriented along the x- or y-direction, since then the Lorentz shift wou ld be along one of the strips, i.e. unmeasurable. Therefore, the detector was rotated 45 degre es, so that the B-field was making an angle of 45 degrees with both the x- and y-axis (see fig. 2). The strips on both sides are bonded to two 128 channel Premux c harge sensitive amplifiers[8]. All signals are digitized for every laser pulse and averaged over a few 100 pulses. The signal position is computed using either the center of gravity or a G auss-fit: ¯x(PH) =/summationtextPHixi/summationtextPHi. (2) HerePHiis the pulse height of the strip iandxiits position. As can be seen from figure 3, the pulse on one side hardly moves d ue to the immediate recombination, while the pulse on the opposite side shows a c lear Lorentz shift. The signal position is plotted as a function of the magnetic fi eld in figure 4, which shows clearly that the signal on one side moves linearly with the ma gnetic field, while the signal on the injection side hardly moves. 33 Results Instead of the Lorentz angle the shift in a 300 µm thick detectors is plotted for a 4 T magnetic field, which is the one of interest for future experiments. Th e dependence on temperature and bias voltage is shown in figures 5 and 6 together with simulati ons from the Davinci software package by TMA[9]. From Davinci drift mobilities are extrac ted for a pad diode and Lorentz shifts were computed using a Hall scattering factor of 1 .15 and 0 .7 for electrons and holes, respectively. For holes the temperature dependence is well described, but for electrons the Lorentz angle first falls below the simulation for decreasing temperature , as expected for a decreasing value of the Hall scattering factor rH. However, below T= 160 K the Lorentz angle for electrons rapidly increases and is a factor two above the simulation at liquid nitrogen temperature. The simulation was done with a temperature independent Hall fac tor of 1.15 (0.7) for electrons (holes), which is certainly wrong[5]. Therefore, the most l ikely interpretation would be in the temperature dependence of the Hall scattering factor, sinc e the drift mobility at low tempera- tures is well known[5] and the electric field dependence is we ll described by the simulation, as shown in Fig. 6. However, if the data is a factor two above the s imulation at low temperature, then a Hall scattering factor around two is needed. Such a lar gerHis expected for impurity scattering[4], but this cannot be reconciled with the high r esistivity silicon used for the sensors, for which the impurity doping is less then 1012/cm3. Before irradiation the detector depletes fully with a bias v oltage of 40 V, while after radiation with 1 .0·101321 MeV protons per cm2the depletion voltage has increased to 100 V. This implies that the bulk is inverted from n-type to p-type material, as e xpected[2]. The bulk damage of 21 MeV protons is aboout 2.8 times the damage by 1 MeV neutrons . The decrease of the Lorentz shift for the irradiated sample below 100 V is due to t he reduced effective thickness of the partially depleted detector. Numerical results on th e Lorentz angles and Lorentz shifts are given in tables 1 and 2 before and after irradiation, resp ectively. Fig. 7 shows the signal from the 1050 nm infrared laser on the i rradiated detector. This laser has an absorption length of about 300 µm at room temperature, so it traverses the detector. It can be seen that the signal on the p-side hardly moves with the magnetic field, as expected for a dominant contribution of holes by the charge integrating a mplifier, while the n-side shows a Lorentz shift corresponding to roughly half the Lorentz shi ft of the red laser. This is expected for ionization distributed in the detector, so the average d rift length is half of the detector thickness. 4 Conclusion The Lorentz angle has been measured for electrons and holes s eparately. For the non-irradiated detector the Lorentz angles of holes agree with simulations at all temperatures, but for electrons 4the Lorentz angle agrees only at room temperature. Below ≈160 K the angle increases rapidly to twice the expected value. A possible explanation could be a Hall scattering factor of ≈2 instead of ≈1. After irradiation the Lorentz angle for holes is hardly chan ged at room temperatures, at least if the bias voltage is raised to obtain full depletion again. However, for electrons the angle decrease 25% at room temperature. At lower temperatures rad iation damage increase the Lorentz angles, both of electrons and holes. Silicon detectors in high magnetic fields at cryogenic tempe ratures can be used without prob- lems, if only the p-side (holes) is read-out. For an n–side re ad-out the too large Lorentz angles can be avoided, if the strips are oriented such, that the Lore ntz shift is parallel to the strips. If this is not wanted, the Lorentz angle can be reduced by over biasing the detector. 5 Acknowlegdements This work was done within the framework of the RD39 Collabora tion[3]. We thank Dr. Iris Abt from the MPI, Munich, Germany for supplying us with doubl e sided strip detectors from the HERA-B production by Sintef. Electrons (280 K) Holes (270 K) Electrons (77 K) Holes (77 K) Bias / V Θ ∆ x[µm] Θ ∆ x[µm]Θ ∆ x[µm]Θ ∆ x[µm] 40 33◦192 6.5◦34 79◦1539 46◦309 100 30◦170 7.2◦38 71◦852 32◦184 200 5.9◦31 56◦449 300 4.8◦25 45◦295 Table 1 The Lorentz angle (Θ L) and displacement ∆ xfor a 300 µmthick detector in a 4 T magnetic field as function of bias voltage at room temperature (top) and nitro gen temperature (bottom). Electrons (280 K) Holes (260 K) Electrons (77 K) Holes (77 K) Bias / V Θ ∆ x[µm] Θ ∆ x[µm]Θ ∆ x[µm]Θ ∆ x[µm] 50 21◦117 8.5◦45 65◦630 45◦297 100 23◦127 8.0◦42 73◦970 48◦329 150 23◦126 7.6◦40 69◦785 37◦228 Table 2 As in table1, but now for a detector irradiated with 21 MeV pro tons up to a fluence of 1013/cm2. 5References [1] E. Belau et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. 214(1983) 253 [2] RD48 collaboration, http://rd48.web.cern.ch, ROSE/T N/2000-03. [3] RD39 Collaboration, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. A440 (2000) 5-16 and http://rd39.web.cern.ch, RD39 Status Report CERN/LHCC 20 00-010, 06-Jan-2000. [4] R.A. Smith, Semiconductors, Cambridge Univ. Press, 196 8 [5] Landolt-B¨ ornstein, Numerical Data and Functional Rel ationships in Science and Technology, Group III, Band 17a, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1982. [6] S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor devices, John Wiley and Sons, 1981. [7] F. Hornung, A. Rimikes, Th. Schneider, High Magnetic Fie ld facilities and Projects at the Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Internal Note, 1999. [8] L. Jones, PremUx128 Specification, version 2.3, Rutherf ord Internal Note, 1995. [9] Technology Modelling Associates, Inc.: Davincie, Vers ion 4.1, July 1998. [10] S. Heising, Silicon detectors for highenergy physics experiments at lo w temperatures and high magnetic fields , Univ. of Karlsruhe, IEKP–KA/99–26 (in german only). [11] F. R¨ oderer, Measurement of Lorentz-angles in Silicon detectors. , Univ. of Karlsruhe, IEKP– KA/98–24 (in german only). [12] F. J. Morin and J. P. Matta, Electrical Properties of Silicon Containing Arsenic and Bo ron, Phys. Rev.96(1954) 28-35. [13] J. S. Blakemore, Solid State Physics , 2nd Edition, (1985) Cambridge University Press. 6Fig. 1. The detectors have three lasers connected to them. Th e red lasers have a penetration depth of a few µm, so with a laser pulse on the n-side or p-side one can measure t he drift from electrons and holes, respectively. With the infrared laser one can sim ulate a through going particle. Fig. 2. The detector mounted at an angle of 45◦on the hybrid in order to be able to measure the Lorenzt shift on both sides of the detector. The pitch adapte r and the Premux128 chip with the 128 charge sensitive amplifiers can be clearly seen. The strips a re parallel to the edges of the detector and oriented at an angle of 90◦with respect to each other on the p- and n-side. The magnetic fi eld is directed from the bottom to the top of the hybrid. 7Wed, 05/04/2000 16:46date / time 0.0 -150.0-100.0-50.0 195 185186 188 190 192 1940 T 4 T 8 Tn-side signal150.0U / V 35000.0I / nA 165.64T / K 50.0 0.010.020.030.040.0 40 30 32 34 36 380 T 4 T 8 Tp-side signalPH PH stripstrip Fig. 3. Laser pulse position in different magnetic fields. Lig ht is injected from the n-side resulting in an almost stable pulse position on that side and a clearly m oving position on the p-side, if the magnetic field is increased to 8 T in steps of 4 T. B / T0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9∆ x / µm -200-150-100-50022.05.1999 0:48 Uhr // log 120 - 129 Fig. 4. Linear regression for the Lorentz shift versus magne tic field. The red laser pulse on the n-side side hardly penetrates, so the electrons are immediately ab sorbed by the strips on the n-side and the holes drift through the detector to the strips on the p-side. Therefore an appreciable shift is only seen for the holes. 8100 200 30000.20.40.60.81∆x (T) (electrons / U = 100 V / B = 4 T) Temperature / K∆x / mmr =1.15HMeasurement e( )Φ= 1e13 p/cm2e (not. irr.) Simulation 100 200 30000.20.4x (T) (holes / U = 100 V / B = 4 T)∆ Temperature / K∆x / mmMeasurement h (not irr.) h( )Φ= 1e13 p/cm2 r =0.7H Simulation Fig. 5. Lorentz shift for electrons (top) and holes (bottom) for 300 µmdetector in a 4 T magnetic field as a function of temperature. Data for an unirradiated d etector and a detector irradiated with protons of 21 MeV to a fluence of 1 .0·1013p/cm2are shown. For comparison, the temperature dependence from the DaVinci simulation program with a const ant Hall scattering factor of 1.15 (0.7) for electrons (holes) is shown by the full lines. 90 100 200 30000.511.52∆x (T) (electrons / T = 77 K / B = 4 T) Voltage / V∆x / mm r =1.15HMeasurement e( )Φ= 1e13 p/cm2e (not. irr.) Simulation 0 100 200 3000∆x (T) (holes / T = 77 K / B = 4 T) Voltage / V∆x / mmMeasurement h (not irr.) h( )Φ= 1e13 p/cm2 r =0.7H Simulation 0.10.20.30.4 Fig. 6. Lorentz shift for a 300 µmdetector in a 4 T magnetic field for electrons (top) and holes (bottom) versus bias voltage at a temperature of 77 K. Both, d ata for an unirradiated detector and a detector irradiated with protons of 21 MeV to a fluence of 1 .0·1013p/cm2are shown. For the latter the full depletion voltage has increased from 40 to 10 0V. For comparison, the temperature dependence from the DaVinci simulation program with a const ant Hall scattering factor of 1.15 (0.7) for electrons (holes)is shown by the full lines. 10Fig. 7. Pulse shape of the infrared laser shining through the irradiated detector (1013p/cm2). The n-side signal is mainly dominated by electrons, the p-side s ignal by holes, as is apparent from the displacement as function of the magnetic field. 11

arXiv:physics/0007060v1 [physics.ins-det] 18 Jul 2000 H H Wills Physics Laboratory Experimental Particle Physics Group University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TL, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)117 928 8735 Fax: +44 (0)117 925 5624BRIS/HEP/2000–03 July 2000 The B ABARCalorimeter Light Pulser System P.J. Clark1) Abstract To make precision measurements with a CsI(Tl) calorimeter i n a high luminosity environment requires that the crystals are well calibrated and continually monit ored for radiation damage. This should not effect the total integrated luminosity which is particularly impo rtant for the BABARcalorimeter to enable it to make CPviolation measurements in the Bmeson system. To achieve this goal a fibre-optic light pulser system was designed using xenon flash lamps as the light sourc e. A novel light distribution method was developed using an array of graded index microlenses. Some i nitial results from performance studies are presented. 1)On behalf of the BABARcollaboration.1 Introduction The light pulser system monitors short term changes in the re sponse of the BABARcalorimeter [1]. It also provides a useful and flexible diagnostic tool for the entire readout chain of the calorimeter from light collection through to data acquisition. The system is designed to have a stability of 0.5% over a period of around one week. It can also monitor long term changes in the calorimete r response to an accuracy of 1% using a reference system which cross-calibrates the intensity of the light pu lses against a radioactive source. Shutters Reference System x 2Neutral Density FiltersFiltersFilters Calorimeter ROMElectronicsFront Endx20Xe Lamp x1Xe LampCrystal x41 Crystal x21 BARRELEND CAP Primary Light Mixer Module Light MixerPrimary Light Mixer Module Light Mixer x1 x1Power Supply 24V/40W Light Pulser ADC VME ModuleTrigger Unit Trigger UnitSupply Socket Supply Socket Amplifier NIM ModuleDiscriminator NIM Module Amplifier NIM Module AmplifierAmplifierPre- Pre-x1 x280 Am+ Gd 148 241Photo- diode multiplierPhoto-CsIx25 BUSY & GATEExtension Boardto Fast Control from Fast Controlx51 Figure 1: Overview of the light pulser system The overall design of the light pulser system is shown in figur e 1. There are two high stability xenon flash lamps manufactured by Hamamatsu (type L4633). One of the lam ps supplies the barrel and the other supplies the endcap calorimeter. The light produced from the xenon la mps is spectrally filtered to match the emission spectrum of CsI scintillation light. It is then attenuated b y two neutral density filters to allow the correct equivalent energy in the calorimeter crystals to be selecte d. The light fills a light mixer bar which uniformly illuminates a bundle of 400 µm multi-mode fibres which deliver the light to the individual calorimeter modules. At each module there is a module mixer which takes the light fr om each fibre and illuminates a close-packed bundle of 200 µm fibres which transport light to individual CsI crystals. Th e light is injected into the rear face of each crystal and then diffusely reflects within the crystal . This effectively imitates the crystal scintillation light produced by the energy deposition of an electromagnet ic shower. The light is then readout using the full BABARcalorimeter electronic readout chain from the photodiodes right through to the data acquistion. The light pulser system produces an equivalent energy in the cal orimeter which is high enough to allow it to be run with beam backgrounds in the detector. A more detailed descr iption is given elsewhere [2]. There is a reference system to take out instabilities in the l ight source. Fibres are routed from the primary mixer systems to the reference system. The reference system itself is cross-calibrated against a mixed alpha source (148Gd and241Am). Both the alpha source and the reference fibres are attach ed to a small CsI crystal which is readout by a photomultiplier tube and a photodiode. The reference system data from both source events and light pulses is collected in the multi-event buffe r of a 12 bit peak sensing ADC (CAEN V556S). The source events are accumulated continuously in the buffer and readout using a 1 Hz software trigger. The readout of light pulser system events is triggered from a signal whic h is derived from the photomultiplier tube in the reference system. This is more accurate than using the input signal to the lamp trigger power supply because there is a time jitter of 200 ns in the lamp response with respe ct to the trigger. The lamps are triggered at a frequency of 14.2 Hz which comes from dividing the BABARclock.2 Graded index microlenses 0.25 Pitch 1.0 Pitch Figure 2: The principle of the microlens In the endcap system graded index microlenses (Newport LGI6 30-3) are used to ensure that all the light modes in the 400 µm fibres are filled correctly. This led to a better uniformity i n the energy distribution. Conventional fibre optics rely upon having a step refractive index where the fibre core is at a higher refractive index than the cladding. Graded index fibre optics however do not have a separate core and cladding. Instead they have a refractive index that varies radially. This resu lts in an optical ray following a sinusoidal path down the fibre rather than discrete total internal reflections, se e figure 2. An interesting feature of these fibres is if they are cut at specific lengths they act as minature lenses. I f an optical ray completes one sinusoidal oscillation within the lens it is said to have a pitch of 1.0. For our case le nses with a pitch of 0.25 allow a collimated light source to be focused. This is ideal for input into a fibre optic . Each lens is coated in an anti-reflection coating (MgF 2) to maximise its transmission. The type of lens which was cho sen was plano-plano meaning that the lens is terminated perpendicularly at both ends. 3 Stability of the system 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03020406080100120140Sigma Nent = 6541 Mean = 0.003874 RMS = 0.003723Sigma Sigma Nent = 6541 Mean = 0.003874 RMS = 0.003723 σChannelsNumber of Figure 3: The stability of the light pulser system It is important for the light pulser system to have as high a pu lse-to-pulse stability as possible. In figure 3 the stability of the system is shown. This is produced by a Gau ss fit to the energy distribution in each channel. The data is normalised to the mean energy in each calorimeter module on a pulse-to-pulse basis. There are a small number of noisy channels due to preliminary electroni cs problems.4 Summary Using the light pulser data from the inner ring of crystals in the endcap calorimeter, where maximum radiation damage occurs, it is possible to obtain a correlation betwee n the total integrated luminosity of data taken by BABARand the differential radiation damage in the endcap. This is t he radiation damage to the inner ring with respect to the rest of the endcap. The correlation is shown in figure 4. This demonstrates that the light pulser system can measure accurately very small changes in the resp onse of the BABARcalorimeter. -1Luminosity / pb0 100 200 300 400 500Radiation damage -0.007-0.006-0.005-0.004-0.003-0.002-0.0010September, 1999 Figure 4: Differential radiation damage in the endcap versus total integrated luminosity References [1] D. Boutigny et al. Babar technical design report. 1995. S LAC-R-0457. [2] P.J. Clark. TheBABARLight Pulser System . PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2000.

arXiv:physics/0007061v1 [physics.acc-ph] 18 Jul 2000LATTICEMATCHINGWITHAQUADRUPOLE MISSING RainerWanzenberg, DESY, Notkestr. 85,22603Hamburg,Germany Abstract The lattice for the present design of the TESLA Lin- ear Collider with integrated X-Ray Laser Facility is basi- cally a FODO structurewith constantbeta-function. There are more than 800 individually powered superconducting quadrupoles to focus the beam in the two main linear ac- celerators(eachwith a lengthof15 km). Forthe availabil- ity of the beams it is importantthat a power supply failure or evena magnet failure doesnot cause a significant down time of the linac. It is demonstrated that the beta-function can be matched with a quadrupole ”missing”. One part of the main linac (up-to 50 GeV) will be used to accelerate theHighEnergyPhysicsbeamandtheFreeElectronLaser drivebeamwithdifferentacceleratinggradients. Therefo re the betatron phase advance will be 60◦or 90◦depending on the beam energy. It is shown that even in that case it is possibletomatchthelatticesimultaneouslyforbothbeams with aquadrupolemissing. 1 INTRODUCTION The conceptual design of the TESLA linear collider with integrated x-ray laser facility [1] requires that one of the two 15 km long super-conductinglinear accelerator has to providebeamsforhighenergyphysics(HEP) experiments and beams for the x-ray free electron laser (FEL) facility. Fig. 1 shows the e−linear acceleratorwhich is used to ac- /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 e+e-e-e- Damping Ring (5 GeV)FEL - Beam Injector Linear Accelerator(FEL - Beam) X-Ray LaserElectron Source (HEP - Beam) Electron - Positron Collision High Energy Physics Exp.FEL-Beam Transfer Line25 GeV 50 GeV Figure 1: The e−linear accelerator of the TESLA linear colliderwithintegratedx-raylaserfacility. celerate the HEP-beam to 250 GeV and the FEL-beam to energiesup-to 50 GeV. There are 25 GeV and 50 GeV ex- tractionpointsinthelinac. TheHEPbeamisinjectedfromthedog-bonedampingringintothemainlinearaccelerator whiletheFEL beamisgeneratedwith anrf-gunandaccel- eratedto5GeVinaninjectorlinacbeforeitisalsoinjected intothe mainlinearaccelerator. Thefirstpartofthee−linearacceleratorisoperatedata duty cycle of 10 Hz providing HEP (2882 bunches) and FEL (11315 bunches) pulses in a alternating way. The pulse structure is illustrated in Fig. 2. The FEL-pulses are accelerated at the same gradient of 17 MV/m but are ejected at 25 GeV or 50 GeV beam energy to be used for differentundulators. 1 nC3 nC 17 MV/m25 MV/mbunch charge acc. grad.HEP bunch train 2882 x 337 ns x 3.2 nCFEL bunch train 11315 x 93 ns x 1 nC 25 GeV pulse50 GeV pulse tt 100 ms 100 ms Figure2: HEPandFELbeampulsestructure The basic optical building block is a FODO cell with a length of 65 m for the first half of the linac (up-to 125 GeV) and a length of 97 m for the second half. Two cryo- modules,housing12(7-cell)cavitieseach,willfitbetween two quadrupolesof the 65 m long FODO cell, while three cryo-moduleswill fit betweenthe quadrupolesof the97 m long cell. The quadrupole strength k=g e/p(gthe gra- dient of the magnet, pthe momentum of the beam) is dif- ferent for the FEL and HEP beamsdue to the different ac- celerating gradients: kFEL=kHEP ·25/17. A betatron phase advance of 60◦is chosen for the HEP beam optics. This corresponds to a phase advance of about 90◦for the FEL beam since the focusing is stronger than that of the HEP beamdueto thelowermomentum. For the availability of the beams it is important that a power supply failure or even a magnet failure does not cause a significant down time of the linac. In the next sec- tionit will beshownhowthelattice canbematchedwitha quadrupole”missing”in thecaseofthe60◦-FODO lattice. Finally it is demonstrated that it is possible to match the latticesimultaneously forbothbeams.2 60◦-FODOLATTICE WITHA QUADRUPOLEMISSING Thebeta-functionsofa standard(i.e. length Lcell= 65 m) FODOcellwith60◦phaseadvanceisshowninFig.3. The quadrupole strength is k= 0.0516/m2for a quadrupole length of 0.6m. The focusing effect of the cavities can be neglectedfor a high energybeam. The minimal and maxi- malbeta-functionsare ˇβ= 37.58 mandˆβ= 112 .41 mfor the HEP beam. The focussingeffect ofthe quadrupoleisa 02468101214 010 20 30 40 50 60 sqrt( Beta / m ) Position / m Beta Functions F D Fhorz. vert. Beam Line Figure 3: Standard FODO cell of the linac (60◦phase ad- vance). The square root of the horizontal (solid line) and vertical (dashed line) beta-function are shown versus the longitudinalpositionforthe HEPbeam. factor 1.47stronger for the FEL-beam resulting in beta- functions ˇβ= 17.32 mandˆβ= 112 .12 mwhich are showninFig.4. 02468101214 010 20 30 40 50 60 sqrt( Beta / m ) Position / m Beta Functions F D Fhorz. vert. Beam Line Figure 4: The squarerootofthe horizontal(solid line)and vertical(dashedline)beta-functionoftheFEL beam. Now it is assumed that one power supply failed caus- ing a significant betatron-mismatch(see Fig. 5). Using the computer code COMFORT [2] it is possible to rematch the beta-function such that two FODO cells down-stream from the missing quadrupole the original periodic solu- tion is recovered. Actually there exist several solutions which rematchthe lattice. The solutionpresentedin Fig. 6 fulfills the additional constraints that the strength of allquadrupolesdoesnot exceedthe designvaluesof the stan- dard 60◦lattice and that the polarity is unchanged, i.e. an F(D)-quadremainsan F(D)-quad. The relative quadrupole strengths of the six matching quadrupoles ( kn/k,n= 1, . . .,6)aresummarizedintable1. 05101520253035404550 050100150200250300350400 sqrt( Beta / m ) Position / m Beta Functions F D F X F D F D F D F D Fhorz. vert. Beam Line Figure 5: Lattice with a missing quad. The square root of the horizontal (solid line) and vertical (dashed line) beta - functionoftheHEP beamareshown. 02468101214161820 050100150200250300350400 sqrt( Beta / m ) Position / m Beta Functions F D1 F2 X F3 D4 F5 D6 F D F D Fhorz. vert. Beam Line Figure 6: Re-matched beta-functionswith a missing quad. The square root of the horizontal (solid line) and vertical (dashedline)beta-functionoftheHEPbeamareshown. Quad kn/k D1 0.7694 F 2 0.0 F 3 0.8283Quad kn/k D 4 0.9118 F5 0.4056 D 6 0.3616 Table 1: Relative quadrupole strength of the 6 matching quadrupoles. All quadrupole strengths are normalized to the quadrupoleofaregularFODO-cell. While the solution presented in Fig. 6 is perfect for the HEP beam, the FEL beam is still mismatched. It is of course possible to find another solution for the FEL beam but that solution would not fulfill the matching conditions for the HEP beam. In the next section a solution is shownwhich matched the lattice for the HEP and FEL beam si- multaneously. 3 SIMULTANEOUS LATTICE MATCHINGFORTHEHEP AND FEL BEAM Simultaneousmatchingof thelattice for theHEP and FEL beamsrequiresa solutionto thefollowingfourequations: T(k1, . . ., k n) βHEP,j αHEP,j γHEP,j = βHEP,j αHEP,j γHEP,j  j=x, y T(λk1, . . ., λk n) βFEL,j αFEL,j γFEL,j = βFEL,j αFEL,j γFEL,j , where Tis the 3×3lattice transfer matrix depending on the quadrupole strengths ki(i= 1. . .n), where βHEP,j, αHEP,j,γHEP,j,βFEL,j,αFEL,j,γFEL,j(j=x, y) are the horizontal and vertical twiss parameter of the HEP andFELbeamcorrespondingtotheperiodicsolutionsofa standard cell (see Fig. 3 and Fig. 4), and λ= 1.47is the ratioofthebeammomentaoftheHEP andFEL beam. CommonlyusedbeamopticscomputercodeslikeCOM- FORT cannot match the beta-functions for two beams of different momenta simultaneously. Using the code Math- cad [3] it is possible to solve the above equations numer- ically using n= 14quadrupoles. The algorithm is based on a quasi-Newtonmethod[3]. The result of the computa- tionsisshownin Fig.7fortheHEPbeamandinFig.8for theFELbeam. Pleasenotethatthemagneticgradientofall quadsisthesameinbothcasesonlythebeammomentadif- fer. The relative strengths of the 14 matching quadrupoles are givenin table 2. Onequadrupoleis 22 % strongerthan a quadrupoleof a regular FODO cell, which is not critical since the simultaneous matching solution is only required forbeamenergiesup-to50GeV. 051015202530 0100 200 300 400 500 600 sqrt( Beta / m ) Position / m Beta Functions F D1 F2 X F3 D4 F5 D6 F7 D8 F9 D10 F11 D12 F13 D14 F D F D Fhorz. vert. Beam Line Figure 7: Simultaneous beam matching with a missing quad. Thesquarerootofthehorizontal(solidline)andver- tical(dashedline)beta-functionoftheHEPbeamisshown.051015202530 0100 200 300 400 500 600 sqrt( Beta / m ) Position / m Beta Functions F D1 F2 X F3 D4 F5 D6 F7 D8 F9 D10 F11 D12 F13 D14 F D F D Fhorz. vert. Beam Line Figure 8: Simultaneous beam matching with a missing quad. Thesquarerootofthehorizontal(solidline)andver- tical(dashedline)beta-functionoftheFELbeamisshown. Quad kn/k D1 0.1075 F 2 0.7727 F 3 0.8390 D4 0.9646 F 5 1.2198 D6 0.9129 F 7 1.0559Quad kn/k D 8 0.9962 F9 0.8883 D10 1.1831 F 11 0.6901 D12 0.8955 F 13 0.9455 D14 1.1530 Table2: Relativequadrupolestrengthsofthe14matching quadrupoles. All quadrupole strengths are normalized to the quadrupoleofaregularFODO-cell. 4 CONCLUSION Ithasbeendemonstratedthatthereexistmatchedbeamop- tics witha missingquadrupoleforthe HEPbeamandeven simultaneously for the HEP and FEL beam. Therefore a powersupplyfailurewillnotcauseasignificantdown-time of the linear accelerator since the operation can continue with are-matchedlattice. Acknowledgment I would like to thank R. Brinkmann for discussions and suggestion formatchingof the 60◦-lattice. Thanksgo also to S.G.Wipfforcarefullyreadingthemanuscript. 5 REFERENCES [1] R. Brinkmann, G. Materlik, J. Rossbach, A. Wagner eds. Conceptual Design of a 500 GeV e+e−Linear Collider with Integrated X-ray Laser Facility , DESY 1997-048, ECFA1997-182 [2] M.D.Woodley,M.J.Lee,J.JaegerandA.S.King, Control Of Machine Functions Or Transport Systems , IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 30(1983) 2367. [3] MathSoft Inc, Mathcad 6.0 , Cambridge, MA., USA

arXiv:physics/0007062v1 [physics.atom-ph] 18 Jul 2000NEW CLOCK COMPARISON TESTS OF LORENTZ SYMMETRY submitted to Proceedings of the 1999 Coral Gables Conference Ronald L. Walsworth and David F. Phillips Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, MA 02138 U.S.A. INTRODUCTION Lorentz symmetry is a fundamental feature of modern descrip tions of nature. Lorentz transformations include both spatial rotations an d boosts. Therefore, experi- mental investigations of rotation symmetry provide import ant tests of the framework of the standard model of particle physics and single-metric theories of gravity [1]. In particular, the minimal SU(3) ×SU(2) ×U(1) standard model successfully de- scribes particle phenomenology, but is believed to be the lo w energy limit of a more fundamental theory that incorporates gravity. While the fu ndamental theory should re- main invariant under Lorentz transformations, spontaneou s symmetry-breaking could result at the level of the standard model in violations of loc al Lorentz invariance (LLI) and CPT (symmetry under simultaneous application of Charge conjugation, Parity inversion, and Time reversal) [2]. Clock comparisons provide sensitive tests of rotation inva riance and hence Lorentz symmetry by bounding the frequency variation of a given cloc k as its orientation changes, e.g., with respect to the fixed stars [3]. In practic e, the most precise limits are obtained by comparing the frequencies of two co-located clocks as they rotate with the Earth (see Fig. 1). Atomic clocks are typically used, inv olving the electromagnetic signals emitted or absorbed on hyperfine or Zeeman transitio ns. We report preliminary results from two new atomic clock test s of LLI and CPT: (1) Using a two-species129Xe/3He Zeeman maser [4–6] we have placed a limit on CPT and LLI violation of the neutron of nearly 10−31GeV, improving by about a factor of three on the bound set by the most sensitive past clock comp arison [7,8]. With further data-taking, we expect another factor of two improv ement in sensitivity. (2) We have also employed atomic hydrogen masers to set an imp roved clean limit on LLI/CPT violation of the proton, at the level of nearly 10−27GeV.Ω quantization axisFigure 1: Bounds on LLI and CPT violation can be obtained by comparing the frequencies of clocks as they rotate with respect to the fixed stars. The standard model extension described in [3,9– 17] admits Lorentz-violating cou- plings of noble gas nuclei and hy- drogen atoms to expectation val- ues of tensor fields. (Some of these couplings also violate CPT.) Each of the tensor fields may have an independent magnitude and orien- tation in space, to be limited by experiment. The background ar- rows in this figure illustrate one such field. MOTIVATION Our atomic clock comparisons are motivated by a standard mod el extension de- veloped by Kosteleck´ y and others [3,9–17]. This theoretic al framework accommodates possible spontaneous violation of local Lorentz invarianc e (LLI) and CPT symmetry, which may occur in a fundamental theory combining the standa rd model with gravity. For example, this might occur in string theory [18]. The stan dard model extension is quite general: it emerges as the low-energy limit of any unde rlying theory that gen- erates the standard model and contains spontaneous Lorentz symmetry violation [19]. The extension retains the usual gauge structure and power-c ounting renormalizability of the standard model. It also has many other desirable prope rties, including energy- momentum conservation, observer Lorentz covariance, conv entional quantization, and hermiticity. Microcausality and energy positivity are exp ected. This well-motivated theoretical framework suggests that s mall, low-energy sig- nals of LLI and CPT violation may be detectable in high-preci sion experiments. The dimensionless suppression factor for such effects would lik ely be the ratio of the low- energy scale to the Planck scale, perhaps combined with dime nsionless coupling con- stants [3, 9–19]. A key feature of the standard model extensi on of Kosteleck´ y et al. is that it is at the level of the known elementary particles, a nd thus enables quanti- tative comparison of a wide array of tests of Lorentz symmetr y. In recent work the standard model extension has been used to quantify bounds on LLI and CPT vio- lation from measurements of neutral meson oscillations [9] ; tests of QED in Penning traps [10]; photon birefringence in the vacuum [11,12]; bar yogenesis [13]; hydrogen and antihydrogen spectroscopy [14]; experiments with muons [1 5]; a spin-polarized torsionH Maser Reference Frequency Synthesizers 4933 Hz A/D Converter0.025 Hz~0 Hz1791 Hz Phase-Sensitive Current SourceNested Magnetic Shields Pump Bulb (T = 120 C) Beam Expander Pickup Coil External ResonatorPreamp Main SolenoidMaser Bulb (T = 40 C)Electric Field Plates795 nm λ/4 B0LDA Figure 2: Schematic of the129Xe/3He Zeeman maser pendulum [16]; observations with cosmic rays [17]; and atom ic clock comparisons [3]. Recent experimental work motivated by this standard model e xtension includes Pen- ning trap tests by Gabrielse et al. on the antiproton and H−[20], and by Dehmelt et al. on the electron and positron [21,22], which place improved l imits on CPT and LLI violation in these systems. Also, a re-analysis by Adelb erger, Gundlach, Heckel, and co-workers of existing data from the “E¨ ot-Wash II” spin -polarized torsion pendu- lum [23,24] sets the most stringent bound to date on CPT and LL I violation of the electron: approximately 10−29GeV [25]. 129Xe/3He MASER TEST OF CPT AND LORENTZ SYMMETRY The design and operation of the two-species129Xe/3He maser has been discussed in recent publications [4–6]. (See the schematic in Fig. 2.) Two dense, co-habitating ensembles of3He and129Xe atoms perform continuous and simultaneous maser oscilla - tions on their respective nuclear spin 1/2 Zeeman transitio ns at approximately 4.9 kHz for3He and 1.7 kHz for129Xe in a static magnetic field of 1.5 gauss. This two-species maser operation can be maintained indefinitely. The populat ion inversion for both maser ensembles is created by spin exchange collisions betw een the noble gas atoms and optically-pumped Rb vapor [26]. The129Xe/3He maser has two chambers, one acting as the spin exchange “pump bulb” and the other serving as the “maser bulb”. This two chamber configuration permits the combination of ph ysical conditions neces- sary for a high flux of spin-polarized noble gas atoms into the maser bulb, while also maintaining3He and129Xe maser oscillations with good frequency stability: 100 nH z stability is typical for measurement intervals of ∼1 hour [6]. (A single-bulb129Xe/3He maser does not provide good frequency stability because of t he large Fermi contact shift of the129Xe Zeeman frequency caused by129Xe-Rb collisions [27].) Either of the noble gas species can serve as a precision magnetometer to st abilize the system’s static magnetic field, while the other species is employed as a sensi tive probe for LLI- and CPT-violating interactions or other subtle physical influe nces. (For example, we are also using the129Xe/3He maser to search for a permanent electric dipole moment of 129Xe as a test of time reversal symmetry; hence the electric fiel d plates in Fig. 2.)40x10-3 20 0 -20 -403He phase residuals (rad) 20151050 hours Figure 3: Typical data from the LLI/CPT test using the129Xe/3He maser.3He maser phase data residuals are shown for one sidereal day. Larmor p recession and drift terms have been removed, and the best-fit sinusoid curve (wit h sidereal-day-period) is displayed We search for a signature of Lorentz violation by monitoring the relative phases and Zeeman frequencies of the co-located3He and129Xe masers as the laboratory reference frame rotates with respect to the fixed stars. We op erate the system with the quantization axis directed east-west in the earth’s refere nce frame, the3He maser free- running, and the129Xe maser phase-locked to a signal derived from a hydrogen mas er in order to stabilize the magnetic field. To leading order, th e standard model extension of Kosteleck´ y et al. predicts that the Lorentz-violating frequency shifts for t he3He and 129Xe maser are the same size and sign [3]. Hence the possible Lor entz-violating effect would have the form: δνLorentz =δνHe[γHe/γXe−1]−1, (1) where δνLorentz is the frequency shift induced in the noble gas Zeeman transi tions by the Lorentz-violating interaction, δνHeis the observed limit to a frequency shift in the free-running3He maser with the period of a sidereal day ( ≈23.93 hours), and γHe/γXe≈2.75 is the ratio of gyromagnetic ratios for3He and129Xe. We acquired data for this experiment over a period of 30 days i n April, 1999 and 24 days in September, 1999. (We are currently taking addi tional data.) We reversed the main magnetic field of the apparatus every ∼4 days to help distinguish possible Lorentz-violating effects from diurnal systemati c variations. In addition, we carefully assessed the effectiveness of the129Xe co-magnetometer, and found that it provides excellent isolation from possible diurnally-var ying ambient magnetic fields, which would not average away with field reversals. Furthermo re, the relative phase between the solar and sidereal day evolved almost 5 π/6 radians between April and September; hence diurnal systematic effects from any source would be reduced by averaging the results from the two existing measurement set s.We analyzed each day’s data in the April and September measur ement sets and determined the amplitude and phase of any sidereal-day-per iod variation in the free- running3He maser frequency. (See Fig. 3 for an example of one day’s dat a.) We employed a linear least squares method to fit the free-runnin g maser phase vs. time using a minimal model including: a constant (phase offset); a linear term (Larmor precession); and cosine and sine terms with sidereal day per iod. For each day’s data, we included terms corresponding to quadratic and maser ampl itude-induced phase drift if they significantly improved the reduced χ2[28]. As a final check, we added a faux Lorentz-violating effect of known phase and amplitude to the raw data and performed the analysis as before. We considered our data reduction for a given sidereal day to be successful if the synthetic physics was recovered and there was no significant change in the covariance matrix generated by the fitting routine. Using the April and September measurement sets, we found no s tatistically sig- nificant sidereal variation of the free-running3He maser frequency. At the one-sigma confidence level, we determined a bound of approximately 80 n Hz on δνLorentz, the mag- nitude of a possible LLI- and CPT-violating effect. Kostelec k´ y and Lane report that the nuclear Zeeman transitions of129Xe and3He are primarily sensitive to Lorentz- violating couplings of the neutron, assuming the correctne ss of the Schmidt model of the nuclei [3]. Thus our search for a sidereal-period freque ncy shift of the free-running 3He maser ( δνHe) provides a bound to the following parameters characterizi ng the magnitude of LLI/CPT violations in the standard model exten sion: /vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle−3.5˜bn J+ 0.012˜dn J+ 0.012˜gn D,J/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle≤2πδνHe,J(129Xe/3He maser) (2) HereJ=X, Ydenotes spatial indices in a non-rotating frame, with XandYoriented in a plane perpendicular to the Earth’s rotation axis and we h ave taken ¯ h=c= 1. The parameters ˜bn J,˜dn J, and ˜gn D,Jdescribe the strength of Lorentz-violating couplings of the neutron to possible background tensor fields. ˜bn Jand ˜gn D,Jcorrespond to couplings that violate both CPT and LLI, while ˜dn Jcorresponds to a coupling that violates LLI but not CPT. All three of these parameters are different li near combinations of fundamental parameters in the underlying relativistic Lag rangian of the standard model extension [3,9–16]. It is clear from Eqn. (2) that the129Xe/3He clock comparison is primarily sensi- tive to LLI/CPT violations associated with the neutron para meter ˜bn J. Similarly, the most precise previous search for LLI/CPT violations of the n eutron, the199Hg/133Cs experiment of Lamoreaux, Hunter et al. [7, 8], also had principal sensitivity to ˜bn Jat the following level [3]: /vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 3˜bn J+{small terms }/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle≤2πδνHg,J(199Hg/133Cs). (3) In this case, the experimental limit, δνHg,J, was a bound of 55 nHz (one-sigma) on a sidereal-period variation of the199Hg nuclear Zeeman frequency, with the133Cs elec- tronic Zeeman frequency serving as a co-magnetometer. Therefore, in the context of the standard model extension of Kosteleck´ y and co- workers [3], our129Xe/3He maser measurement improves the constraint on ˜bn Jto nearly1 mGSolenoidMagnetic ShieldsStorage Bulbµwave Cavity TE 011 ModeHexapole MagnetRF Dissociator Atomic Hydrogen Source Output Loop Fluxgate MagnetometerHelmholtz Coils Reference H Maser Frequency Counter Zeeman CoilsAmbient Magnetic Field Feedback Loop Figure 4: Schematic of the H maser in its ambient field stabili zation loop. 10−31GeV, or about three times better than the199Hg/133Cs clock comparison [7,8]. Note that the ratio of this limit to the neutron mass (10−31GeV/mn∼10−31) compares favorably to the dimensionless suppression factor mn/MPlanck ∼10−19that might be expected to govern spontaneous symmetry breaking of LLI and CPT originating at the Planck scale. We expect a factor of two improvement in the sen sitivity to LLI/CPT- violation with the completion of129Xe/3He maser data taking in spring, 2000. We also expect more than an order of magnitude improvement in sensit ivity using a new device currently under development in our laboratory: the21Ne/3He Zeeman maser. HYDROGEN MASER TEST OF CPT AND LORENTZ SYMMETRY The hydrogen maser is an established tool in precision tests of fundamental physics [29]. Hydrogen masers operate on the ∆ F= 1, ∆ mF= 0 hyperfine transition in the ground state of atomic hydrogen [30]. Hydrogen molecules ar e dissociated into atoms in an RF discharge, and the atoms are state selected via a hexa pole magnet (Fig. 4). The high field seeking states, ( F= 1,mF= +1,0) are focused into a Teflon coated cell which resides in a microwave cavity resonant with the ∆ F= 1 transition at 1420 MHz. The F= 1,mF= 0 atoms are stimulated to make a transition to the F= 0 state by the field of the cavity. A static magnetic field of ∼1 milligauss is applied to maintain the quantization axis of the H atoms. The hydrogen transitions most sensitive to potential CPT an d LLI violations are theF= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman transitions. In the 0 .6 mG static field applied for these measurements, the Zeeman frequency is νZ≈850 Hz. We utilize a double resonance technique to measure this frequency with a precision of ∼1 mHz [31]. We apply a weak magnetic field perpendicular to the static field and osci llating at a frequency close to the Zeeman transition. This audio-frequency drivi ng field couples the three sublevels of the F= 1 manifold of the H atoms. Provided a population differenceexists between the mF=±1 states, the energy of the mF= 0 state is altered by this coupling, thus shifting the measured maser frequency in a ca refully analyzed manner [31] described by a dispersive shape (Fig. 5(a)). Important ly, the maser frequency is unchanged when the driving field is exactly equal to the Zeema n frequency. Therefore, we determine the Zeeman frequency by measuring the driving fi eld frequency at which the maser frequency in the presence of the driving field is equ al to the unperturbed maser frequency. TheF= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman frequency is directly proportional to the static magnetic field, in the small-field limit. Four layers of high p ermeability ( µ-metal) magnetic shields surround the maser (Fig. 4), screening ext ernal field fluctuations by a factor of 32 000. Nevertheless, external magnetic field fluc tuations cause remnant variations in the observed Zeeman frequency. As low frequen cy magnetic noise in the neighborhood of this experiment is much larger during the da y than late at night, the measured Zeeman frequency could be preferentially shifted by this noise (at levels up to ∼0.5 Hz) with a 24 hour periodicity which is difficult to distingui sh from a true sidereal signal in our relatively short data sample. Therefore, we em ploy an active stabilization system to cancel such magnetic field fluctuations (Fig. 4). A fl uxgate magnetometer placed as close to the maser cavity as possible controls larg e (8 ft. dia.) Helmholtz coils surrounding the maser via a feedback loop to maintain a const ant ambient field. This feedback loop reduces the fluctuations at the sidereal frequ ency to below the equivalent of 1µHz on the Zeeman frequency at the location of the magnetomete r. The Zeeman frequency of a hydrogen maser was measured for 11 d ays in November, 1999. During this period, the maser remained in a closed, tem perature controlled room to reduce potential systematics from thermal drifts wh ich might be expected to have 24 hour periodicities. The feedback system also mainta ined a constant ambient magnetic field. Each Zeeman measurement took approximately 20 minutes to acquire and was subsequently fit to extract a Zeeman frequency (Fig. 5 (a)). Also monitored were maser amplitude, residual magnetic field fluctuation, a mbient temperature, and current through the solenoidal coil which determines the Ze eman frequency (Fig. 4). The data for all 11 days (Fig. 5(b)) were then fit to extract the sidereal-period sinusoidal variation of the Zeeman frequency. In addition t o the sinusoid, piecewise linear terms (whose slopes were allowed to vary independent ly for each day) were used to model the slow remnant drift of the Zeeman frequency (roug hly 250 mHz over 11 days). A one sigma limit was established for a sidereal-peri od variation of the hydrogen F= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman frequency: δνH Z≤0.7 mHz. Expressed in terms of energy, this is a shift in the Zeeman splitting of less than 3 ·10−27GeV. The hydrogen atom is directly sensitive to LLI and CPT violat ions of the pro- ton and the electron. Following the notation of reference [1 4], one finds that a limit on a sidereal-period modulation of the Zeeman frequency ( δνH Z) provides a bound to the following parameters characterizing the magnitude of L LI/CPT violations in the standard model extension of Kosteleck´ y and co-workers: |be 3+bp 3−de 30me−dp 30mp−He 12−Hp 12| ≤2πδνH Z (4) for the low static magnetic fields at which we operate. (Again , we have taken ¯ h= c= 1.) The terms beandbpdescribe the strength of background tensor field couplings-202Δνmaser (mHz) 860858856854 Zeeman drive frequency (Hz)-0.100.000.10νz - 857.1 Hz 2401921449648 time (hours) (a) (b) Figure 5: (a) An example of a double resonance measurement of theF= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman frequency in the hydrogen maser. The change from the u nperturbed maser frequency is plotted versus the driving field frequency. (b) Zeeman data from 11 days of the LLI/CPT test using the H maser. that violate CPT and LLI while the Handdterms describe couplings that violate LLI but not CPT [14]. The subscript 3 in Eqn. (4) indicates the direction along the quantization axis of the apparatus, which is vertical in the lab frame but rotates with respect to the fixed stars with the period of the sidereal day. As in refs. [3, 21], we can re-express the time varying change in the hydrogen Zeeman frequency in terms of parameters expressed in a non-r otating frame as 2πδνH Z,J=/parenleftBig˜bp J+˜be J/parenrightBig sinχ. (5) where ˜bw J=bw j−dw j0mw−1 2ǫJKLHw KL,J=X, Yrefers to non-rotating spatial indices in the plane perpendicular to the rotation vector of the eart h,wrefers to either the proton or electron parameters, and χ= 42◦is the latitude of the experiment. As noted above, a re-analysis by Adelberger, Gundlach, Heck el, and co-workers of existing data from the “E¨ ot-Wash II” spin-polarized torsi on pendulum [23,24] sets the most stringent bound to date on CPT and LLI violation of the el ectron: ˜be J≤10−29 GeV [25]. Therefore, in the context of the standard model ext ension of Kosteleck´ y and co-workers [3,14] the H maser measurement to date constrain s LLI and CPT violations of the proton parameter ˜bp J≤4·10−27GeV at the one sigma level. This preliminary limit is comparable to that derived from the199Hg/133Cs experiment of Lamoreaux, Hunter et al.[7,8] but in a much cleaner system (the hydrogen atom nucleus , a proton, as opposed to the199Hg and133Cs nuclei). The experiment is in progress with more data taking expected in early spring, 2000. Further studies of sy stematics will be performed including reversal of the quantization axis as well as a chan ge in the magnitude of the applied field. CONCLUSIONS Precision comparisons of atomic clocks provide sensitive t ests of Lorentz and CPT symmetries, thereby probing extensions to the standard model [3,9–17] in whichthese symmetries can be spontaneously broken. Measurement s using the two-species 129Xe/3He Zeeman maser constrain violations of CPT and Lorentz symm etry of the neutron at nearly the 10−31GeV level. Measurements with atomic hydrogen masers provide clean tests of CPT and Lorentz symmetry violation of the proton at nearly the 10−27GeV level. Improvements in both experiments are being pursu ed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Richard Stoner, David Bear, Marc Humphrey, Edward Mattison , and Robert Ves- sot are collaborators on the research described in this repo rt. We gratefully acknowl- edge the encouragement and active support of these projects by Alan Kosteleck´ y, and technical assistance by Marc Rosenberry and Timothy Chupp. Development of the 129Xe/3He Zeeman maser was supported by a NIST Precision Measuremen t Grant. Support for the Lorentz violation tests was provided by NASA grant NAG8-1434, ONR grant N00014-99-1-0501, and the Smithsonian Institution S cholarly Studies Program. REFERENCES 1. C.M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics Cambridge Univer- sity Press, New York, 1981. 2. The discrete symmetries C, P, and T are discussed, for exam ple, in R.G. Sachs, The Physics of Time Reversal, University of Chicago, Chicago, 1987. 3. V.A. Kosteleck´ y and C.D. Lane, Phys. Rev. D 60, 116010 (1999). 4. T.E. Chupp, R.J. Hoare, R.L. Walsworth, and B. Wu, Phys. Re v. Lett. 72, 2363 (1994). 5. R.E. Stoner, M.A. Rosenberry, J.T. Wright, T.E. Chupp, E. R. Oteiza, R.L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3971 (1996). 6. D. Bear, T.E. Chupp, K. Cooper, S. DeDeo, M.A. Rosenberry, R.E. Stoner, and R.L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. A 57, 5006 (1998). 7. C.J. Berglund, L.R. Hunter, D. Krause, Jr., E.O. Prigge, M .S. Ronfeldt and S.K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1879 (1995). 8. L.R. Hunter, C.J. Berglund, M.S. Ronfeldt, E.O. Prigge, D . Krause and S.K. Lamoreaux, in CPT and Lorentz Symmetry , V.A. Kosteleck´ y, ed., World Scien- tific, Singapore, 1999. 9. V.A. Kosteleck´ y and R. Potting, in D.B. Cline, ed., Gamma Ray–Neutrino Cosmology and Planck Scale Physics , World Scientific, Singapore, 1993 (hep- th/9211116); Phys. Rev. D 51, 3923 (1995); D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Lett. B 344, 259 (1995); Phys. Rev. D 52, 6224 (1995); V.A. Kosteleck´ y and R. Van Kooten, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5585 (1996); V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1818 (1998); Phys. Rev. D 61, 16002 (2000). 10. R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Let t.79, 1432 (1997); Phys. Rev. D 57, 3932 (1998). 11. S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990).12. D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997); ibid.58, 116002 (1998); R. Jackiw and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572 (1999); 13. O. Bertolami , D. Colladay, V.A. Kosteleck´ y, and R. Pott ing, Phys. Lett. B 395, 178 (1997). 14. R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y and N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Let t.82, 2254 (1999). 15. R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y and C.D. Lane, Phys. Rev. Lett .,84, 1098 (2000), hep-ph/9912451. 16. R. Bluhm and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. Lett. (in press ). 17. S. Coleman and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 56, 116008 (1999). 18. V.A. Kosteleck´ y and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989); ibid.40, 1886 (1989); V.A. Kosteleck´ y and R. Potting, Nucl. Phys. B 359, 545 (1991); Phys. Lett. B 381, 89 (1996). 19. V.A. Kosteleck´ y and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 224 (1989); ibid.66, 1811 (1991). 20. G. Gabrielse, A. Khabbaz, D.S. Hall, C. Heimenn, H. Kalin owski, and W. Jhe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3198 (1999). 21. R.K. Mittleman, I.I. Ioannou, H.G. Dehmelt, and N. Russe ll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2116 (1999). 22. H. Dehmelt, R. Mittleman, R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., and P. Schwi nberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4694 (1999). 23. E.G. Adelberger et al., in P. Herczeg et al., eds., Physics Beyond the Standard Model, p. 717, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999. 24. M.G. Harris, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Washington, 1998. 25. B. Heckel, results presented at the 1999 Coral Gables Con ference (see report elsewhere in this volume). 26. T.G. Walker and W. Happer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 629 (1997). 27. M.V. Romalis and G.D. Cates, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3004 (1998); N.R. Newbury, A.S. Barton, P. Bogorad, G.D. Cates, H. Mabuchi, and B. Saam, Phys. Rev. A 48, 558 (1993); S.R. Schafer, G.D. Cates, T.R. Chien, D. Gonata s, W. Happer, and T.G. Walker, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5613 (1989). 28. We employed the F-test at the 99% confidence level to decid e whether the addition of a new term to the fit model was justified. See Philip R. Beving ton,Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1992). 29. R.F.C. Vessot et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, (1980) 2081; RJ.P. Turneaure, C.M. Will, B.F. Farrell, E.M. Mattison, and R.F.C Vessot, Phys. R ev. D27, (1983) 1705; R.L. Walsworth, I.F. Silvera, E.M. Mattison, and R.F. C. Vessot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, (1990) 2599. 30. D. Kleppner, H.M. Goldenberg, and N.F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev .126, 603 (1962); D. Kleppner, H.C. Berg, S.B. Crampton, N.F. Ramsey, R.F.C. Ves sot, H.E. Peters, and J. Vanier, Phys. Rev. 138, A972 (1965). 31. H.G. Andresen, Z. Physik, 210, 113 (1968).

arXiv:physics/0007063v1 [physics.atom-ph] 18 Jul 2000New Clock Comparison Searches for Lorentz and CPT Violation Ronald L. Walsworth, David Bear, Marc Humphrey, Edward M. Mattison, David F. Phillips, Richard E. Stoner, and Robert F. C. Vessot Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. to appear in the Proceedings of the 3rd International Sympos ium on Symmetries in Subatomic Physics Abstract. We present two new measurements constraining Lorentz and CP T viola- tion using the129Xe/3He Zeeman maser and atomic hydrogen masers. Experimental investigations of Lorentz and CPT symmetry provide importa nt tests of the frame- work of the standard model of particle physics and theories o f gravity. The two-species 129Xe/3He Zeeman maser bounds violations of CPT and Lorentz symmetr y of the neu- tron at the 10−31GeV level. Measurements with atomic hydrogen masers provid e a clean limit of CPT and Lorentz symmetry violation of the prot on at the 10−27GeV level. INTRODUCTION Lorentz symmetry is a fundamental feature of modern descrip tions of nature. Lorentz transformations include both spatial rotations an d boosts. Therefore, experimental investigations of rotation symmetry provide important tests of the framework of the standard model of particle physics and sing le-metric theories of gravity [1]. In particular, the minimal SU(3) ×SU(2) ×U(1) standard model successfully de- scribes particle phenomenology, but is believed to be the lo w energy limit of a more fundamental theory that incorporates gravity. While t he fundamental theory should remain invariant under Lorentz transformations, sp ontaneous symmetry- breaking could result at the level of the standard model in vi olations of local Lorentz invariance (LLI) and CPT (symmetry under simultane ous application of Charge conjugation, Parity inversion, and Time reversal) [ 2]. Clock comparisons provide sensitive tests of rotation inva riance and hence Lorentz symmetry by bounding the frequency variation of a gi ven clock as its orientation changes, e.g., with respect to the fixed stars [3 ]. In practice, the most precise limits are obtained by comparing the frequencies of two co-located clocks2 in the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. Ω quantization axis FIGURE 1. Bounds on LLI and CPT violation can be obtained by comparing t he frequencies of clocks as they rotate with respect to the fixed stars. The stan dard model extension described in [3,9–17] admits Lorentz-violating couplings of noble gas n uclei and hydrogen atoms to expectation values of tensor fields. (Some of these couplings also violat e CPT.) Each of the tensor fields may have an unknown magnitude and orientation in space, to be limited by experiment. The background arrows in this figure illustrate one such field. as they rotate with the Earth (see Fig. 1). Atomic clocks are t ypically used, in- volving the electromagnetic signals emitted or absorbed on hyperfine or Zeeman transitions. We report results from two new atomic clock tests of LLI and CP T: (1) Using a two-species129Xe/3He Zeeman maser [4–6] we placed a limit on CPT and LLI violation of the neutron of nearly 10−31GeV, improving by more than a factor of six on the best previous measurement [7,8]. (2) We employed atomic hydrogen masers to set an improved cle an limit on LLI/CPT violation of the proton, at the level of nearly 10−27GeV. MOTIVATION Our atomic clock comparisons are motivated by a standard mod el extension developed by Kosteleck´ y and others [3,9–17]. This theoret ical framework accom- modates possible spontaneous violation of local Lorentz in variance (LLI) and CPT symmetry, which may occur in a fundamental theory combining the standard model with gravity. For example, this might occur in string theory [18]. The standardin the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. 3 model extension is quite general: it emerges as the low-ener gy limit of any under- lying theory that generates the standard model and contains spontaneous Lorentz symmetry violation [19]. The extension retains the usual ga uge structure and power-counting renormalizability of the standard model. I t also has many other desirable properties, including energy-momentum conserv ation, observer Lorentz covariance, conventional quantization, and hermiticity. Microcausality and energy positivity are expected. This well-motivated theoretical framework suggests that s mall, low-energy signals of LLI and CPT violation may be detectable in high-precision experiments. The dimensionless suppression factor for such effects would lik ely be the ratio of the low-energy scale to the Planck scale, perhaps combined with dimensionless coupling constants [3,9–19]. A key feature of the standard model exte nsion of Kosteleck´ y et al. is that it is at the level of the known elementary particles, a nd thus enables quantitative comparison of a wide array of tests of Lorentz s ymmetry. In recent work the standard model extension has been used to quantify b ounds on LLI and CPT violation from measurements of neutral meson oscillati ons [9]; tests of QED in Penning traps [10]; photon birefringence in the vacuum [1 1,12]; baryogenesis [13]; hydrogen and antihydrogen spectroscopy [14]; experi ments with muons [15]; a spin-polarized torsion pendulum [16]; observations with cosmic rays [17]; and atomic clock comparisons [3]. Recent experimental work mot ivated by this standard model extension includes Penning trap tests by Gabrielse et al. on the antiproton and H−[20], and by Dehmelt et al. on the electron and positron [21,22], which place improved limits on CPT and LLI violation in these systems. Al so, a re-analysis by Adelberger, Gundlach, Heckel, and co-workers of existing d ata from the “E¨ ot-Wash II” spin-polarized torsion pendulum [23,24] sets the most s tringent bound to date on CPT and LLI violation of the electron: approximately 10−28GeV [25]. 129XE/3HE MASER TEST OF CPT AND LORENTZ SYMMETRY The design and operation of the two-species129Xe/3He maser has been discussed in recent publications [4–6]. (See the schematic in Fig. 2.) Two dense, co-located ensembles of3He and129Xe atoms perform continuous and simultaneous maser os- cillations on their respective nuclear spin 1/2 Zeeman tran sitions at approximately 4.9 kHz for3He and 1.7 kHz for129Xe in a static magnetic field of 1.5 gauss. This two-species maser operation can be maintained indefinitely . The population inver- sion for both maser ensembles is created by spin exchange col lisions between the noble gas atoms and optically-pumped Rb vapor [26]. The129Xe/3He maser has two chambers, one acting as the spin exchange “pump bulb” and the other serving as the “maser bulb”. This two chamber configuration permits t he combination of physical conditions necessary for a high flux of spin-polari zed noble gas atoms into the maser bulb, while also maintaining3He and129Xe maser oscillations with good frequency stability: ∼100 nHz stability is typical for measurement intervals of ∼14 in the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. H Maser Reference Frequency Synthesizers 4933 Hz A/D Converter0.025 Hz~0 Hz1791 Hz Phase-Sensitive Current SourceNested Magnetic Shields Pump Bulb (T = 120 C) Beam Expander Pickup Coil External ResonatorPreamp Main SolenoidMaser Bulb (T = 40 C)Electric Field Plates795 nm λ/4 B0LDA FIGURE 2. Schematic of the129Xe/3He Zeeman maser hour [6]. (A single-bulb129Xe/3He maser does not provide good frequency stability because of the large Fermi contact shift of the129Xe Zeeman frequency caused by 129Xe-Rb collisions [27].) Either of the noble gas species can s erve as a precision magnetometer to stabilize the system’s static magnetic fiel d, while the other species is employed as a sensitive probe for LLI- and CPT-violating i nteractions or other subtle physical influences. (For example, we are also using t he129Xe/3He maser to search for a permanent electric dipole moment of129Xe as a test of time reversal symmetry; hence the electric field plates in Fig. 2.) We search for a signature of Lorentz violation by monitoring the relative phases and Zeeman frequencies of the co-located3He and129Xe masers as the laboratory reference frame rotates with respect to the fixed stars. We op erate the system with the quantization axis directed east-west on the Earth, the3He maser free-running, and the129Xe maser phase-locked to a signal derived from a hydrogen mas er in order to stabilize the magnetic field. To leading order, the standa rd model extension of Kosteleck´ y et al. predicts that the Lorentz-violating frequency shifts for t he3He and129Xe maser are the same size and sign [3]. Hence the possible Lor entz-violating frequency shift in the free-running3He maser ( δνHe) is given by: δνHe=δνLorentz [γHe/γXe−1], (1) where δνLorentz is the sidereal-day-period modulation induced in both nobl e gas Zeeman frequencies by the Lorentz-violating interaction, andγHe/γXe≈2.75 is the ratio of gyromagnetic ratios for3He and129Xe. We acquired 90 days of data for this experiment over the perio d April, 1999 to April, 2000. We reversed the main magnetic field of the appa ratus every ∼4 days to help distinguish possible Lorentz-violating effect s from diurnal system- atic variations. In addition, we carefully assessed the effe ctiveness of the129Xe co-magnetometer, and found that it provides excellent isol ation from possible diurnally-varying ambient magnetic fields, which would not average away with field reversals. Furthermore, the relative phase between th e solar and siderealin the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. 5 40x10-3 20 0 -20 -403He phase residuals (rad) 20151050 hours FIGURE 3. Typical data from the LLI/CPT test using the129Xe/3He maser.3He maser phase data residuals are shown for one sidereal day. Larmor preces sion and drift terms have been removed, and the best-fit sinusoid curve (with sidereal-day -period) is displayed day evolved about 2 πradians over the course of the experiment; hence diurnal systematic effects from any source would be reduced by averag ing the results from the measurement sets. We analyzed each day’s data and determined the amplitude and phase of a possible sidereal-day-period variation in the free-runni ng3He maser frequency. (See Fig. 3 for an example of one day’s data.) We employed a linear l east squares method to fit the free-running maser phase vs. time using a minimal mo del including: a constant (phase offset); a linear term (Larmor precession); and cosine and sine terms with sidereal day period. For each day’s data, we included te rms corresponding to quadratic and maser amplitude-induced phase drift if they s ignificantly improved the reduced χ2[28]. As a final check, we added a fauxLorentz-violating effect of known phase and amplitude to the raw data and performed the analysis as before. We considered our data reduction for a given siderea l day to be successful if the synthetic physics was recovered and there was no signi ficant change in the covariance matrix generated by the fitting routine. Using the 90 days of data, we found no statistically significa nt sidereal variation of the free-running3He maser frequency at the level of 90 nHz (two-sigma confidenc e). Kosteleck´ y and Lane report that the nuclear Zeeman transit ions of129Xe and3He are primarily sensitive to Lorentz-violating couplings of the neutron, assuming the correctness of the Schmidt model of the nuclei [3]. Thus our s earch for a sidereal- period frequency shift of the free-running3He maser ( δνHe) provides a bound to the following parameters characterizing the magnitude of L LI/CPT violations in the standard model extension:6 in the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. /vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle−3.5˜bn J+ 0.012˜dn J+ 0.012˜gn D,J/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle≤2πδνHe,J(129Xe/3He maser) (2) HereJ=X, Y denotes spatial indices in a non-rotating frame, with XandY oriented in a plane perpendicular to the Earth’s rotation ax is and we have taken ¯h=c= 1. The parameters ˜bn J,˜dn J, and ˜ gn D,Jdescribe the strength of Lorentz- violating couplings of the neutron to possible background t ensor fields. ˜bn Jand ˜gn D,J correspond to couplings that violate both CPT and LLI, while ˜dn Jcorresponds to a coupling that violates LLI but not CPT. All three of these pa rameters are dif- ferent linear combinations of fundamental parameters in th e underlying relativistic Lagrangian of the standard model extension [3,9–16]. It is clear from Eqn. (2) that the129Xe/3He clock comparison is primarily sensitive to LLI/CPT violations associated with the neutron paramete r˜bn J. Similarly, the most precise previous search for LLI/CPT violations of the n eutron, the199Hg/133Cs experiment of Lamoreaux, Hunter et al. [7,8], also had principal sensitivity to ˜bn J at the following level [3]: /vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 3˜bn J+{small terms }/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle≤2πδνHg,J(199Hg/133Cs). (3) In this case, the experimental limit, δνHg,J, was a bound of 110 nHz (two-sigma confidence) on a sidereal-period variation of the199Hg nuclear Zeeman frequency, with the133Cs electronic Zeeman frequency serving as a co-magnetomete r. Therefore, in the context of the standard model extension of Kosteleck´ y and co-workers [3], our129Xe/3He maser measurement improves the constraint on ˜bn Jto nearly 10−31GeV, or more than six times better than the199Hg/133Cs clock comparison [7,8]. Note that the ratio of this limit to t he neutron mass (10−31GeV/mn∼10−31) compares favorably to the dimensionless suppression fac- tormn/MPlanck ∼10−19that might be expected to govern spontaneous symmetry breaking of LLI and CPT originating at the Planck scale. We ex pect more than an order of magnitude improvement in sensitivity to LLI/CPT –violation of the neutron using a new device recently demonstrated in our labo ratory: the21Ne/3He Zeeman maser. HYDROGEN MASER TEST OF CPT AND LORENTZ SYMMETRY The hydrogen maser is an established tool in precision tests of fundamental physics [29]. Hydrogen masers operate on the ∆ F= 1, ∆ mF= 0 hyperfine transition in the ground state of atomic hydrogen [30]. Hydr ogen molecules are dissociated into atoms in an RF discharge, and the atoms are s tate selected via a hexapole magnet (Fig. 4). The high field seeking states, ( F= 1,mF= +1,0) are focused into a Teflon coated cell which resides in a microwave cavity resonant with the ∆ F= 1 transition at 1420 MHz. The F= 1,mF= 0 atoms are stimulated toin the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. 7 1 mGSolenoidMagnetic ShieldsStorage Bulbµwave Cavity TE 011 ModeHexapole MagnetRF Dissociator Atomic Hydrogen Source Output Loop Fluxgate MagnetometerHelmholtz Coils Reference H Maser Frequency Counter Zeeman CoilsAmbient Magnetic Field Feedback Loop FIGURE 4. Schematic of the H maser in its ambient field stabilization lo op. make a transition to the F= 0 state by the field of the cavity. A static magnetic field of ∼1 milligauss is applied to maintain the quantization axis of the H atoms. The hydrogen transitions most sensitive to potential CPT an d LLI violations are theF= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman transitions. In the 0 .6 mG static field applied for these measurements, the Zeeman frequency is νZ≈850 Hz. We utilize a double resonance technique to measure this frequency with a precis ion of ∼1 mHz [31]. We apply a weak magnetic field perpendicular to the static fiel d and oscillating at a frequency close to the Zeeman transition. This audio-frequ ency driving field couples the three sublevels of the F= 1 manifold of the H atoms. Provided a population difference exists between the mF=±1 states, the energy of the mF= 0 state is altered by this coupling, thus shifting the measured maser f requency in a carefully analyzed manner [31] described by a dispersive shape (Fig. 5 (a)). Importantly, the maser frequency is unchanged when the driving field is exa ctly equal to the Zeeman frequency. Therefore, we determine the Zeeman frequ ency by measuring the driving field frequency at which the maser frequency in th e presence of the driving field is equal to the unperturbed maser frequency. TheF= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman frequency is directly proportional to the static magnetic field, in the small-field limit. Four layers of high p ermeability ( µ-metal) magnetic shields surround the maser (Fig. 4), screening ext ernal field fluctuations by a factor of 32 000. Nevertheless, external magnetic field fl uctuations cause rem- nant variations in the observed Zeeman frequency. As low fre quency magnetic noise in the neighborhood of this experiment is much larger during the day than late at night, the measured Zeeman frequency could be preferential ly shifted by this noise (at levels up to ∼0.5 Hz) with a 24 hour periodicity which is difficult to distingui sh8 in the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. -202Δνmaser (mHz) 860858856854 Zeeman drive frequency (Hz)-0.100.000.10νz - 857.1 Hz 2401921449648 time (hours) (a) (b) FIGURE 5. (a) An example of a double resonance measurement of the F= 1, ∆ mF=±1 Zeeman frequency in the hydrogen maser. The change from the u nperturbed maser frequency is plotted versus the driving field frequency. (b) Zeeman fre quency data from 11 days of the LLI/CPT test using the H maser. from a true sidereal signal in our relatively short data samp le. Therefore, we employ an active stabilization system to cancel such magnetic field fluctuations (Fig. 4). A fluxgate magnetometer placed as close to the maser cavity as possible controls large (2.4 m dia.) Helmholtz coils surrounding the maser via a feedback loop to maintain a constant ambient field. This feedback loop reduce s the fluctuations at the sidereal frequency to below the equivalent of 1 µHz on the Zeeman frequency at the location of the magnetometer. The Zeeman frequency of a hydrogen maser was measured for ∼31 days over the period Nov., 1999 to March, 2000. During data taking, the mas er remained in a closed, temperature controlled room to reduce potential sy stematics from thermal drifts which might be expected to have 24 hour periodicities . The feedback system also maintained a constant ambient magnetic field. Each Zeem an measurement took approximately 20 minutes to acquire and was subsequent ly fit to extract a Zeeman frequency (Fig. 5(a)). Also monitored were maser amp litude, residual magnetic field fluctuation, ambient temperature, and curren t through the solenoidal coil which determines the Zeeman frequency (Fig. 4). The data were then fit to extract the sidereal-period sinusoi dal variation of the Zeeman frequency. (See Fig. 5(b) for an example of 11 days of d ata.) In addition to the sinusoid, piecewise linear terms (whose slopes were a llowed to vary inde- pendently for each day) were used to model the slow remnant dr ift of the Zeeman frequency. No significant sidereal-day-period variation o f the hydrogen F= 1, ∆mF=±1 Zeeman frequency was observed. Our measurements set a boun d on the magnitude of such a variation of δνH Z≤0.3 mHz. Expressed in terms of energy, this is a shift in the Zeeman splitting of less than 1 ·10−27GeV. The hydrogen atom is directly sensitive to LLI and CPT violat ions of the protonin the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. 9 and the electron. Following the notation of reference [14], one finds that a limit on a sidereal-day-period modulation of the Zeeman frequency ( δνH Z) provides a bound to the following parameters characterizing the magnitude o f LLI/CPT violations in the standard model extension of Kosteleck´ y and co-worke rs: |be 3+bp 3−de 30me−dp 30mp−He 12−Hp 12| ≤2πδνH Z (4) for the low static magnetic fields at which we operate. (Again , we have taken ¯h=c= 1.) The terms beandbpdescribe the strength of background tensor field couplings that violate CPT and LLI while the Handdterms describe couplings that violate LLI but not CPT [14]. The subscript 3 in Eqn. (4) i ndicates the direction along the quantization axis of the apparatus, whi ch is vertical in the lab frame but rotates with respect to the fixed stars with the peri od of the sidereal day. As in refs. [3,21], we can re-express the time varying change in the hydrogen Zeeman frequency in terms of parameters expressed in a non-r otating frame as 2πδνH Z,J=/parenleftBig˜bp J+˜be J/parenrightBig sinχ. (5) where ˜bw J=bw j−dw j0mw−1 2ǫJKLHw KL,J=X, Yrefers to non-rotating spatial indices in the plane perpendicular to the rotation vector of the eart h,wrefers to either the proton or electron parameters, and χ= 42◦is the latitude of the experiment. As noted above, a re-analysis by Adelberger, Gundlach, Heck el, and co-workers of existing data from the “E¨ ot-Wash II” spin-polarized tor sion pendulum [23,24] sets the most stringent bound to date on CPT and LLI violation of the electron: ˜be J≤10−28GeV [25]. Therefore, in the context of the standard model ext ension of Kosteleck´ y and co-workers [14,3] the H maser measurement t o date constrains LLI and CPT violations of the proton parameter ˜bp J≤2·10−27GeV at the one sigma level. This limit is comparable to that derived from the199Hg/133Cs experiment of Lamoreaux, Hunter et al. [7,8] but in a much cleaner system (the hydrogen atom nucleus is a proton, compared to the complicated nuclei of199Hg and133Cs). CONCLUSIONS Precision comparisons of atomic clocks provide sensitive t ests of Lorentz and CPT symmetries, thereby probing extensions to the standard model [3,9–17] in which these symmetries can be spontaneously broken. Measur ements using the two-species129Xe/3He Zeeman maser constrain violations of CPT and Lorentz sym- metry of the neutron at the 10−31GeV level. Measurements with atomic hydrogen masers provide clean tests of CPT and Lorentz symmetry viola tion of the proton at the 10−27GeV level. Improvements in both experiments are being pursu ed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the encouragement and active sup port of these projects by Alan Kosteleck´ y, and technical assistance by M arc Rosenberry and10 in the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. Timothy Chupp. Development of the129Xe/3He Zeeman maser was supported by a NIST Precision Measurement Grant. Support for the Lorentz violation tests was provided by NASA grant NAG8-1434, ONR grant N00014-99-1 -0501, and the Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Studies Program. REFERENCES 1. Will, C.M., Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1981. 2. The discrete symmetries C, P, and T are discussed, for exam ple, in Sachs, R.G., The Physics of Time Reversal, University of Chicago, Chicago, 1987. 3. Kosteleck´ y, V.A., and Lane, C.D., Phys. Rev. D 60, 116010/1-17 (1999). 4. Chupp, T.E., Hoare, R.J., Walsworth, R.L., and Wu, B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2363- 2366 (1994). 5. Stoner, R.E., Rosenberry, M.A., Wright, J.T., Chupp, T.E ., Oteiza, E.R., and Walsworth, R.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3971-3974 (1996). 6. Bear, D., Chupp, T.E., Cooper, K., DeDeo, S., Rosenberry, M.A., Stoner, R.E., and Walsworth, R.L., Phys. Rev. A 57, 5006-5008 (1998). 7. Berglund, C.J., Hunter, L.R., Krause, Jr., D., Prigge, E. O., Ronfeldt M.S., and Lamoreaux, S.K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1879-1882 (1995). 8. Hunter, L.R., Berglund, C.J., Ronfeldt, M.S., Prigge, E. O., Krause, D., and Lamore- aux, S.K., “A Test of Local Lorentz Invariance Using Hg and Cs Magnetometers,” inCPT and Lorentz Symmetry , edited by Kosteleck´ y, V.A., World Scientific, Singa- pore, 1999, pp. 180-186. 9. Kosteleck´ y, V.A., and Potting, R., “CPT, Strings, and th eK−¯KSystem,” in Gamma Ray–Neutrino Cosmology and Planck Scale Physics , edited by Cline, D.B., World Scientific, Singapore, 1993, hep-th/9211116; Phys. Rev. D 51, 3923-3935 (1995); Colladay D., and Kosteleck´ y, V.A., Phys. Lett. B 344, 259-265 (1995); Phys. Rev. D 52, 6224-6230 (1995); Kosteleck´ y, V.A., and Van Kooten, R., Phys. Rev. D 54, 5585 (1996); Kosteleck´ y, V.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1818-1821 (1998); Phys. Rev. D61, 16002/1-9 (2000). 10. Bluhm, R., Kosteleck´ y, V.A., and Russell, N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1432-1435 (1997); Phys. Rev. D 57, 3932-3943 (1998). 11. Carroll, S.M., Field, G.B., and Jackiw, R., Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231-1240 (1990). 12. Colladay, D., and Kosteleck´ y, V.A., Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760-6774 (1997); ibid.58, 116002/1-23 (1998); Jackiw, R., and Kosteleck´ y, V.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572- 3575 (1999); 13. Bertolami, O., Colladay, D., Kosteleck´ y, V.A., and Pot ting, R., Phys. Lett. B 395, 178-183 (1997). 14. Bluhm, R., Kosteleck´ y, V.A., and Russell, N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2254-2257 (1999). 15. Bluhm, R., Kosteleck´ y, V.A., and Lane, C.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1098-1101 (2000). 16. Bluhm, R. and Kosteleck´ y, V.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1381-1384 (2000). 17. Coleman, S., and Glashow, S.L., Phys. Rev. D 56, 116008/1-14 (1999). 18. Kosteleck´ y, V.A. and Samuel, S., Phys. Rev. D 39, 683-685 (1989); ibid.40, 1886-in the Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Sym. in Subatomic Phys. 11 1903 (1989); Kosteleck´ y, V.A. and Potting, R., Nucl. Phys. B 359, 545-570 (1991); Phys. Lett. B 381, 89-96 (1996). 19. Kosteleck´ y, V.A., and Samuel, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 224-227 (1989); ibid.66, 1811-1814 (1991). 20. Gabrielse, G., Khabbaz, A., Hall, D.S., Heimenn, C., Kal inowski, H., and Jhe, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3198-3201 (1999). 21. Mittleman, R.K., Ioannou, I.I., Dehmelt, H.G., and Russ ell, N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2116-2119 (1999). 22. Dehmelt, H., Mittleman, R., Van Dyck, Jr., R.S., and Schw inberg, P., Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4694-4696 (1999). 23. Adelberger, E.G., et al., inPhysics Beyond the Standard Model, edited by P. Herczeg et al., World Scientific, Singapore, 1999, p. 717. 24. Harris, M.G., Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Washington, 1998. 25. Heckel, B., presented at International Conference on Or bis Scientiae 1999: Quantum Gravity, Generalized Theory of Gravitation and Superstrin g Theory Based Unifica- tion (28th Conference on High Energy Physics and Cosmology S ince 1964), Fort Launderdale, Florida, 16-19 Dec., 1999. 26. Walker, T.G., and Happer, W., Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 629-642 (1997). 27. Romalis, M.V., and Cates, G.D., Phys. Rev. A 58, 3004-3011 (1998); Newbury, N.R., Barton, A.S., Bogorad, P., Cates, G.D., Mabuchi, H., and Saa m, B., Phys. Rev. A 48, 558-568 (1993); Schafer, S.R., Cates, G.D., Chien, T.R., G onatas, D., Happer, W., and Walker, T.G., Phys. Rev. A 39, 5613-5623 (1989). 28. We employed the F-test at the 99% confidence level to decid e whether the addition of a new term to the fit model was justified. See Philip R. Bevingto n,Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, Second Ed., McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1992, ch. 11. 29. Vessot, R.F.C., et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 2081-2084 (1980); Turneaure, R.J.P., Will, C.M., Farrell, B.F., Mattison, E.M., and Vessot, R.F.C., Phys. Rev. D 27, 1705-1714 (1983); Walsworth, R.L., Silvera, I.F., Mattison, E.M., an d Vessot, R.F.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2599-2602 (1990). 30. Kleppner, D., Goldenberg, H.M., and Ramsey, N.F., Phys. Rev. 126, 603-615 (1962); Kleppner, D., Berg, H.C., Crampton, S.B., Ramsey, N.F., Ves sot, R.F.C., Peters, H.E., and Vanier, J., Phys. Rev. 138, A972-983 (1965). 31. Andresen, H.G., Z. Physik, 210, 113-141 (1968).

arXiv:physics/0007064v1 [physics.acc-ph] 18 Jul 2000FURTHER STUDIESONTHE PROSPECTS FOR MANY-TEVMUON COLLIDERS∗ B.J. King,BNL, Upton,NY 11973,USA Abstract New self-consistent parameter sets are presented and dis- cussed for muon collider rings at center-of-mass energies of10,30and100TeV.Allthreeparametersetsattainlumi- nosities of L= 3×1035cm−2.s−1. The parameter sets benefit from new insights gained at the HEMC’99 work- shop[3] thatconsideredthefeasibilityofmany-TeVmuon colliders. 1 INTRODUCTION Table1ofthispaperpresentsself-consistentparameterse ts for muon collider storage rings at center-of-mass energies ofECoM= 10, 30 and 100 TeV. The parameter sets have benefitted and evolved from previous attempts at defining plausible parameter sets for many-TeV muon colliders. It is helpfulto beginby reviewingthese previousstudiesand their motivation in order to provide a context for the dis- cussionofthecurrentparameters. Parameter sets for muon collider rings at energies up to ECoM= 100TeVwerepresentedin1998[1]and1999[2]. Following this, a much improved level of understanding wasthenobtainedfromthefirstsubstantialdedicatedstudy of suchmany-TeVmuoncolliders,whichtookplace at the week-long HEMC’99 workshop [3]. The majority of the studiesatHEMC’99eitherassumedorcritiquedstraw-man parametersets [4], oneat ECoM= 10andtwo at 100TeV, that wereprovidedexpresslyforthispurpose. BesidespresentinganoverviewoftheHEMC’99param- eter sets, reference [4] also reviewed the feed-back on the parameters that was provided by the workshop. This pa- per should be referredto for many discussions that remain relevantforthecurrentparametersetsoftable1. The 48 participants at HEMC’99 considered side-by- sidetheacceleratorchallengesandthehighenergyphysics (HEP) potential of many-TeV muon colliders. The HEP motivation for the workshop was very strong because ex- perimental discoveries in HEP normally come from ad- vances in energy reach, as has been emphasized and dis- cussedin,forexample,references[5]and[6]. HEPdiscus- sions specific to many-TeV muon colliders can be found in [7]and,mainly,in theHEMC’99Proceedings[3]. Ofthethreemany-TeVparametersetsintable1,thoseat 10TeVand100TeVevolveddirectlyfromthecorrespond- ing10TeVand(thefirstofthe)100TeVparametersetsfor HEMC’99, taking into account the constructive criticisms that emergedfrom the workshop. A mid-pointenergywas considered valuable for examining parameter trends with ∗Submitted to Proc. EPAC 2000. This work was performed under t he auspices of the U.S.Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02- 98CH10886.increasing energy, and the 30 TeV parameter set provides such an interpolationbetweenthe lower andhigherenergy sets. Invaluablebenchmarksforallofthesemany-TeVstudies were provided by lower energy parameters that have been studiedandevaluated[8,9]bytheMuonColliderCollabo- ration (MCC). The first column of table 1 shows, for com- parison, the range of parameters for the muon colliders in the range ECoM= 0.1, 3 TeV from the MCC’s status re- port[9]. 2 DISCUSSION ONPARAMETER SETS The energy scale and some other parameter choices in ta- ble 1 were strongly influenced by considerations of syn- chrotronradiation. Thisimposesa naturalcut-offscale fo r circularmuonstorageringsin the range ECoM∼100TeV since the synchrotron radiation loss at such energies has risen rapidly to become comparable to the beam power. AtHEMC’99,Telnovmadetheadditionalobservation[10] that the quantum nature of the sychrotron radiation could lead to beam heating, rather than cooling, for sufficiently high beam energies and small emittances. This observa- tion effectively invalidated the more aggressive of the two HEMC’99 parameter sets at 100 TeV – which therefore won’t be discussed further in this paper – and also cast some doubt on the 100 TeV parameter set with the larger emittance. The synchrotron radiation concerns were addressed in the 100TeVparameterset intable1 by: 1. raising theemittancein each ofthe transversecoordi- nates by the large factor of 90. This should comfort- ably address Telnov’s concern and result in net syn- chrotron cooling by raising the horizontal emittance to wellabovethequantumbreak-evenvalue 2. increasing the collider ring circumference by a fac- tor of two and, correspondingly,reducingthe average bendingmagneticfieldbyafactoroftwo,to5.3Tesla 3. reducing the average beam current by nearly a factor of2,to 4mA. The combined effect of the second and third changes was to reduce the synchrotronradiation to 50 MW, down from the previous, somewhat problematic level of 195 MW in the HEMC’99 parameter set. Althoughstill a factor of 2.5 larger than the synchrotron power at LEP II, this reduced level was considered very appropriate for a far future col- liderat theenergyfrontier. These changes should also help to address reservations expressed by Harrison [11] at HEMC’99 about the feasi-bility of 10 Tesla cosine theta dipoles in the presence of large amounts of synchrotron radiation. Besides lowering the average required magnetic field by a factor of two, it isnotedthatthesynchrotronradiationpowerdepositedper unit length around the collider ring has fallen by almost a factorof8fromthe HEMC’99parameterset at 100TeV. In addition to the adjustments just mentioned that were specific to the 100 TeV parameter set, all three many-TeV parametersetsintable1weremademoreconservativethan the HEMC’99parametersetsinseveralareas: •in recognition of the difficulty and novelty of ioniza- tion cooling,thephasespace densitiesin table1 were all scaled back to coincide with the upper end of the parameterchoicesfromreference[9]forlowerenergy muoncolliders,i.e. 2.4×1022m−3. •the final focus parameters are perhaps the most dif- ficult of all for a non-specialist to evaluate. As has been discussed in references [1, 2, 4], the final focus difficultycan beusefullybenchmarkedto othermuon collider and e+e−collider parameter sets according to the value of 3 parameters in particular: the β∗in the x and y coordinates and of two other defined pa- rameters, the so-called “demagnification factor” and “chromaticity quality factor”. All three benchmark parameters have been somewhat relaxed in response to feed-back[4] fromthestudiesbyfinal focuslattice experts at HEMC’99. Further explicit magnet lattice designs, now for each of the three parameter sets in table1,wouldbeinvaluableforassessingwhetherthe new,morerelaxedparametershavereachedanaccept- able levelofplausibility •the averagebeam currentsandresultingbeam powers were reduced so that the worst case, at 100 TeV, had a summed beam plus synchrotronpower of 180 MW, i.e. comparable to the 170 MW beam power that has been under consideration for the Accelerator Produc- tionofTritiumproject[12] •the beam-beam tune disruption parameter was low- ered slightly for all three sets to a value, in the worst case, of ∆ν= 0.091. This is not far above the im- pressive new LEP II record of ∆ν= 0.083that was reportedinthisconference[13]. The unavoidable cost of these relaxed machine param- eters was to lower the luminosity to L= 3×1035 cm−2.s−1for each of the 10, 30 and 100 TeV param- eters. This is a reduction to 30% of the luminosities, L= 1×1036cm−2.s−1, of the correspondingHEMC’99 parameter sets for 10 TeV and 100TeV. To put this in per- spective,thenewluminositiesarestill ordersofmagnitud e higher than at any existing colliders and are also higher than any speculated parameters the author is aware of for plausiblefuturemachinesotherthanmuoncolliders.3 SUMMARY The extremely high constituent particle energies and lu- minosities of the parameter sets presented in table 1 con- tinue to emphasize the impressive potential of muon col- liders for exploring the energy frontier of elementary par- ticle physics. Therefore, further paper studies and simu- lations for many-TeV muon colliders should continue to play a valuablerole in our field. More specifically, the pa- rametersetspresentedinthispaperwouldcertainlybenefit fromfeed-backandconstructivecriticism byexpertsin ar- eassuchasthedesignoffinalfocuslattices. 4 REFERENCES [1] B.J. King, Discussion on Muon Collider Parameters at Cen- terofMassEnergiesfrom0.1TeVto100TeV ,Proc.EPAC’98, BNL–65716. available from LANL preprint archive as physics/9908016 . [2] B.J. King, Muon Colliders from 10 TeV to 100 TeV , Proc. PAC’99,NewYork,1999,pp.3038-40,availablefromLANL preprint archive as physics/9908018 . [3] HEMC’99 workshop, ”Studies on Colliders and Collider Physics at the Highest Energies: Muon Colliders at 10 TeV to 100 TeV”, Montauk, NY, U.S.A., 27 Sept-1 Oct, 1999, ProceedingspublishedbyAmericanInstituteofPhysics,we b page: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/people/bking/heshop/ . [4] B.J. King, Parameter Sets for 10 TeV and 100 TeV Muon Colliders, and their Study at the HEMC'99 Workshop , Proc. HEMC’99[3],alsoavailablefromtheLANLpreprintarchive asphysics/0005008 . [5] Bill Willis, Muon Collider Workshop Summary , Proc. HEMC’99[3]. [6] B.J.King, ProspectsforCollidersandColliderPhysicstothe 1PeVEnergy Scale ,Proc.HEMC’99[3],alsoavailablefrom the LANLpreprint archive as hep-ex/0005008 . [7] B.J. King, Muon Colliders: New Prospects for Precision Physics and the High Energy Frontier, Proc. Second Latin American Symposium on High Energy Physics, San Juan, PuertoRico,8-11April,1998,AlsoavailablefromtheLANL preprint archive as hep-ex/9908041 . [8] The Muon Collider Collaboration, µ+µ−Collider: A Fea- sibility Study , BNL-52503, Fermilab-Conf-96/092, LBNL- 38946, July1996. [9] The Muon Collider Collaboration, Status of Muon Collider Research and Development and Future Plans , Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams,3August, 1999. [10] Valery Telnov, Limit on Horizontal Emittance in High En- ergy Muon Colliders due to Synchrotron Radiation , Proc. HEMC’99[3]. [11] MikeHarrison, MagnetChallenges: TechnologyandAfford- ability,oral presentation at HEMC’99[3]. [12] The Accelerator Production of Tritium Project, http://apt.lanl.gov . [13] R. Assmann et al.,LEP Operation and Performance with 100 GeVCollidingBeams , these proceedings.Table 1: Self-consistent collider ring parameter sets for m any-TeV muon colliders. For comparison, the first column displaysthe rangeofparametersforthelowerenergymuonco llidersdiscussedinreference[9]. parameterset A B C centerofmassenergy, ECoM 0.1to3TeV 10TeV 30TeV 100TeV colliderphysicsparameters: luminosity, L[1035cm−2.s−1] 8×10−5→0.5 3.0 3.0 3.0/integraltextLdt [fb−1/year] 0.08→540 3000 3000 3000 No. of µµ→eeevents/det/year 650→10000 2600 290 26 No. of100GeVSM Higgs/year 4000→600000 4×1065×1066×106 CoM energyspread, σE/E[10−3] 0.02→1.1 0.42 0.080 0.071 colliderringparameters: circumference,C[km] 0.35→6.0 15 39 200 ave. bendingBfield[T] 3.0→5.2 7.0 8.1 5.2 beamparameters: (µ−or)µ+/bunch, N0[1012] 2.0→4.0 2.9 2.0 1.6 (µ−or)µ+bunchrep. rate, fb[Hz] 15→30 15 7.5 5 6-dim. norm. emit., ǫ6N[10−12m3] 170→170 125 85 70 ǫ6N[10−4m3.MeV/c3] 2.0→2.0 1.5 1.0 0.83 P.S.density, N0/ǫ6N[1022m−3] 1.2→2.4 2.3 2.4 2.3 x,yemit. (unnorm.) [ π.µm.mrad] 3.5→620 0.84 0.19 0.040 x,ynormalizedemit. [ π.mm.mrad] 50→290 40 27 19 long. emittance[ 10−3eV.s] 0.81→24 28 40 68 fract. mom. spread, δ[10−3]0.030→1.6 0.50 0.20 0.075 relativistic γfactor, Eµ/mµ473→14200 47300 142000 473000 timetobeamdump, tD[γτµ] nodump nodump nodump nodump effectiveturns/bunch 450→780 1040 1200 780 ave. current[mA] 17→30 29 12 4.0 beampower[MW] 1.0→29 70 72 128 synch. rad. criticalE [MeV] 5×10−7→8×10−40.012 0.12 1.75 synch. rad. E loss/turn[GeV] 7×10−9→3×10−40.017 0.52 25 synch. rad. power[MW] 1×10−7→0.010 0.48 6.0 50 beam+ synch. power[MW] 1.0→29 70 78 180 powerdensityintomagnetliner[kW/m] 1.0→1.7 2.0 0.84 0.48 interactionpointparameters: spotsize, σx,y[µm] 3.3→290 1.7 0.88 0.47 bunchlength, σz[mm] 3.0→140 3.4 4.0 5.4 β∗ x,y[mm] 3.0→140 3.4 4.0 5.4 ang. divergence, σθ[mrad] 1.1→2.1 0.50 0.22 0.086 beam-beamtunedisruption, ∆ν0.015→0.051 0.079 0.079 0.091 pinchenhancementfactor, HB 1.00→1.01 1.06 1.06 1.09 beamstrahlungfrac. Eloss/collision negligible 2.3×10−81.0×10−75.5×10−7 finalfocuslatticeparameters: max. poletipfieldofquads., B5σ[T] 6→12 12 12 12 max. fullaper. ofquad., A±5σ[cm] 14→24 21 25 31 quad. gradient, 2B5σ/A±5σ[T/m] 50→90 120 97 77 βmax[km] 1.5→150 520 3200 24000 ffdemag., M≡/radicalbig βmax/β∗ 220→7100 12000 28000 67000 chrom. qualityfactor, Q≡M·δ 0.007→11 6.2 5.7 5.0 neutrinoradiationparameters: colliderreferencedepth,D[m] 10→300 100 100 100 ave. rad. doseinplane[mSv/yr] 2×10−5→0.02 1.2 4.8 20 str. sec. len. for10xave. rad. [m] 1.3→2.2 0.95 1.6 8.4 νbeamdistancetosurface[km] 11→62 36 36 36 νbeamradiusat surface[m] 4.4→24 0.75 0.25 0.075

- 1 -The Orientation of Local Spatial Reference Frames in Quantum Teleportation DOUGLAS M. S NYDER LOS ANGELES , CALIFORNIA ABSTRACT Quantum teleportation raises the question of the orientation of the local spatial reference frames from which and to which teleportaton occurs. Issues related to this question are raised, and two possible explanations of these is sues are offered. An empirical test to distinguish between them is proposed in the form of a gedankenexperiment. TEXT In the teleportation scheme proposed by Bennett et al. [1], a quantum state of a spin 1/2 particle X at one location can be teleported to another distantlocation where another spin 1/2 particle Y is located. An experimental realization following the basic idea of Bennett et al. has been accomplished [2]. Following Bennett et al. [1], allow that in a gedankenexperiment the state to be teleported for a spin one-half particle X for the spin component alongthe z axis is: |y X> = a|­X > + b|¯X > (1) After teleportation, perhaps including a rotation around the x, y, or z axes where Y is located or perhaps allowing for an unimportant phase factor, the state of Y should be the same as that which characterized X before teleportation: |y Y> = a|­Y > + b|¯Y > (2) The following question arises: How does one determine the orientation of the x, y, or z axes at Y which is distant from X? That is, when an observer obtains the classically communicated message regarding the nature of the Bell- state measurement at X, how does the observer at Y determine how the local, orthogonal spatial axes are located within which a rotation can be made, if needed, to achieve the same state for Y that characterized X before teleportation? What is the orientation frame within which these orthogonal axesfor an observer at Y are located? Does one somehow attempt to define some more general spatial coordinate frame in which the local spatial coordinate frames pertaining to X and Y are oriented? Or does one not need to beThe Orientation of - 2 -concerned about using a more general spatial reference frame with regard to the relative orientations of the local spatial coordinate frames for X and Y? In the latter case, the local coordinate frame would somehow be in alignment with each other in terms of local factors. What these factors are would require investigation. To determine whether a more general spatial reference frame is relevant or whether the local spatial frames for X and Y are not located within a more general frame, our gedankenexperiment can be elaborated. Consider a series ofexperimental runs (1,2,3É) where a number of particles X 1,2,3É are produced in the exact same state ( with the same wave function y) and teleported to Y1,2,3É. Allow that X1,2,3É is prepared in the state (1) above in a lab located at one location on the earthÕs surface. Let Y1,2,3É be located in a lab such that X1,2,3É and Y1,2,3É are located at two ends of the earthÕs diameter and Y1,2,3É takes on state (2) after quantum teleportation. X1,2,3É and Y1,2,3É are at opposite locations on the earthÕs surface. How would an observer next to Y1,2,3É set up the lab so as to determine the z axis needed to interpret state (2) of Y1,2,3É? As before, consider the case where the Bell state measurement at Xa and another particle yields a measurement indicating that state (1) is teleported with only a phase change to Ya , - |y Y> = - ( a|­Y > + b|¯Y >) . Allow further that the lab at X1,2,3É is set so that the z axis for X1,2,3É noted in state (1) is orthogonal to the earthÕs surface and that spin up along the z axis indicates the direction pointing away from the earthÕs surface. In a similar lab setup at Y1,2,3É where the z axis also points away from the earthÕs surface, the spin up direction for Y1,2,3É would be reversed. They would be in opposite Direction of spin up for X1,2,3É along the local z axisDirection of spin up for Y1,2,3É along the local z axis More General z axis Figure 1. Comparison of Directions for Spin Up for X1,2,3É and Y1,2,3É in Relation to a More General z axisThe Orientation of - 3 -directions when compared to a more general z axis that encompasses the local z axes for the labs where X1,2,3É and Y1,2,3É are located. An example of a more general z axis is depicted in Figure 1. If the results obtained for Y1,2,3É indicated that the state that had characterized X1,2,3É before teleportation has accurately teleported, then the data obtained in measurements on Y1,2,3É would have been those obtained for X1,2,3É had they been made and the thesis that there is only a local nature for an orientation frame within which the local spatialcoordinate frame is located would be supported (Table 1). These are the results predicted by Eqn. 2. If, on the other hand, there is a more general spatial frame within which the local ones for X 1,2,3É and Y1,2,3É are located and which serves to orient the local z axes for X1,2,3É and Y1,2,3É. regardless of how the observers set up their local spatial frames, the results obtained for Y1,2,3É would be different than those that would be obtained if the measurement had been made on X1,2,3É before teleportation. An example of these results, corresponding to the example in Figure 1, is displayed in Table 2. The results in Figure 2 are not those predicted by Eqn. 2 for Y1,2,3É. Table 1 Percentage of Particles Y1,2,3É Expected to be Observed to Have Spin Up or Spin Down Along the Local z-axis Where Only Local Spatial Frames Exist ­ |a|2 ¯ |b|2 Table 2 Percentage of Particles Y1,2,3É Expected to be Observed to Have Spin Up or SpinDown Along the Local z-axis Where a General Spatial Frame Exists Like that In Figure 1 and Supercedes Local Frames ­ |b|2 ¯ |a|2The Orientation of - 4 -In more concrete terms, if for example a = 1/2 and b = Ö(3/4), if a local orientation frame is the only relevant frame, the percentage of particles Y1,2,3É with spin up is | a|2 = 1/4 and spin down is | b|2 = 3/4. If a more general spatial frame with a z axis like that in Figure 1 is relevant to the local spatial coordinate frames for X1,2,3É and Y1,2,3É and takes precedence, the percentage of particles Y1,2,3É with spin up is | b|2 = 3/4 and spin down is | a|2 = 1/4. This result contradicts that expected by Eqn. 2. It is difficult to imagine that there are any influences in the form of general spatial coordinate frames on orientation of local spatial axes for X1,2,3É and Y1,2,3É. The most general circumstances are that Y1,2,3É could be located in a local spatial reference frame with any orientation relative to that for X1,2,3É . As Bennett et al. [1] noted: Teleportation has the advantage of still being possible in situations where Alice and Bob, after sharing their EPR pairs, have wandered about independently and no longer know each othersÕ locations. Alice cannot reliably send Bob the original quantum particle, or a spin-exchanged version of it, if she doesnot know where he is; but she can still teleport the quantum state to him, by broadcasting the classical information to all places where he might be. The general circumstances are the most likely, and the likelihood of a more general spatial coordinate frame relevant to the local frames, that supercedes them, is small. If the hypothesis is supported that a general spatial reference frame is not relevant, then psychological factors should be investigated as factors in the local orientation frames within which the local spatial axes are placed. It has been shown that psychological factors are central to an individualÕs sense of the upright that would form the basis for the observerÕs personal spatial structure [e.g., 3,4,5,6,7,8]. It may be that this personal spatial structure of the observer serves as the basis for the local orientation frame within which the spatial coordinate frame used to measure either X or Y locally if a more general spatial coordinate frame is not applicable.The possibility that the personal spatial structure of the observer is significant can be subjected to empirical test. R EFERENCES [1] C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, W. K. Wooters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).The Orientation of - 5 -[2] D. Bouwmeester, J. W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger. Nature 390, 575 (1997). [3] D. M. Snyder. On the Positioning of Objects in Space. (1998). (xxx.lanl.gov.abs/physics/9909008,publish.aps.org/eprint/gateway/eplist/aps1998sep23_002). [4] G.M. Stratton. The Psychological Review , 4, 341 (1897). [5] G.M. Stratton. The Psychological Review , 4, 463 (1897). [6] I. Kohler. Psychological Issues , 3, 19 and 165 (1964). [7] F. W. Snyder, N. H. Pro nko. Vision with spatial inversion (University of Witchita Press, Witchita, Kansas, 1952). [8] H. Dolezal. Living in a world transformed . (Academic Press, New York, 1982).

arXiv:physics/0007066v1 [physics.gen-ph] 19 Jul 2000Cosmic Acceleration: A Natural Remedy For Horizon and Flatn ess Problems Abhas Mitra Theoretical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Cent er, Mumbai-400085, India E-mail: amitra@apsara.barc.ernet.in The standard big bang cosmology has been greatly suc- cessful in explaining many observational aspects of the rea l universe. However, two particular diffficulties faced by it a re the so-called “horizon” and “flatness” problems. By assumin g that the recently found cosmic acceleration to be a genuine and ever present effect, we show that, the resultant modified Friedman model is free from both the above referred problems , and there is no need to invoke the additional “inflationary” initial phase as a seperate ingredient. The important cosmo - logical milestones of the standard big babg cosmology (whic h predicts cosmic deceleration) like GUT symmetry breaking epoch or radiation matter decoupling epoch may remain more or less unchanged in the modified cosmology in terms of red- shift values. However, in terms of cosmic time t, all such epochs occur earlier as the universe becomes older in this case.I. INTRODUCTION Only a few years ago, it was believed that the uni- verse is undergoing a declerated expansion (DE). Then it was felt that there is no compelling reason to retain the “cosmological constant” term, Λ, in the Einstein equa- tions describing the evolution of the universe. In such a case, it followed that, the behaviour of the universe filled with matter and radiation, could be broadly de- scribed as S(t) =αtn, where n <1 and αis a constant of proportionality [1,2]. For instance, for the early radia - tion dominated era, one has S∼t1/2and for the matter dominated universe, S∼t2/3(for a closed universe with curvature parameter k= 0). However, over the past few years, studies of luminosity- distance studies involving type supernova I, have sug- gested that the universe is undergoing accelerated ex- pansion (AE). Such AE is possible either due to presence of a Λ term or because of the presence of a quintessence [3]. The simplest way to broadly reprsent the AE would be to write S(t) =αtn; n >1 (1) In the past era of supposed decelerated expansion, one would encounter the socalled horizon and flatness puzzle. In the former case, it is difficult to find an answer asto why the universe is so isotropic and homogeneous if the universe comprised causally disconnected tiny patches in the very early era. In the latter case, one has to ex- plain why the quantity |Ω−1|∼ O1 in the present epoch unless Ω was extremely fine tuned to unity in the early past. Here Ω is the ratio of the actual density of the universe ( uto the critical density needed to close the universe uc= 8πG/3H2, where His the Hubble constant. To remedy such problems, in the framework of the sup- posed (incorrect) decelerated expansion, one needed to introduce, in a fairly ad hoc manner, a brief spell of sud- den exponential expansion by a factor of ∼1030starting fromt≈10−35s. It is this rapid expansion which is supposed to to bring distant regions within the sphere of causality and simultaneously flattening the universe [2–5]. Following this brief infalationary period, the uni- verse is supposed to revert back to the original decel- erated expansion mode in a manner which is harly well understood. However, we shall show below that once we accept the fact the universe is undergoing AE rather than DE and 1assume that it was so in the past too, there is no need to posulate an ad hoc inflationary phase alteast for the purpose of solving the horizon or flatness problems. II. REMOVAL OF HORIZON PROBLEM The range of the causal horizon is defined as dH=S(t)/integraldisplayt 0dt′ S(t′)(2) Using Eq. (1) we see that dH=S(t) k/integraldisplayt 0t′−ndt′=S(t) kt′(1−n) (1−n)|t 0 (3) Forn >1, the above integral blows up and there is no horzon problem. III. FLATNESS PROBLEM In the presence of the cosmological term, the relation- ship between present density u, Hubble constant H, and scale size Sis [2] H2+K S2=8πGu 3+Λc2 3(4) Dividing both sides by H2, we have 1 +K H2S2= Ω +Λc2 3H2(5) Or, Ω−1 =k H2S2−Λc2 3H2(6) Here note that ˙S=nαtβ;β=n−1>0; H=˙S S=n/t (7) Using the foregoing relationships, we find from Eq. (6) that for the present epoch t=t1and for the past epoch t=t2 Ω1−1 Ω2−1=kα−2t−2β 1−Λ1t2 1c2 3 kα−2t−2β 2−Λ2t2 2c2 3(8) Ast2→0, the second term in the denominator of the above equation →0, and we obtain Ω1−1 Ω2−1=/parenleftbiggt1 t2/parenrightbigg−2β −/parenleftbiggΛ1 Λ2/parenrightbigg t2 1t2β 2 (9) Again as t2→0, both the terms on the RHS of the foregoing equation →0 if Λ varies less sharply than t−2. Therefore, we find thatΩ1−1 =O(0)(Ω 2−1) (10) So in the present universe, we should not only have |Ω1−1|∼ O(1), but, we should actually have Ω 1= Ωmatter + ΩΛ→1. Then there is no flatness problem, and on the other hand, the universe should be completely flat at any appreciable value of t. In fact very recent observations indeed show that this is precisely the case [6]. IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The age of the universe in the present case could be finite. This can be seen in the following simple way: t=/integraldisplaydS ˙S(11) By using Eq. (7), we see that t=S1/n α(12) In contrast there could be more involved models incorpo- rating AE for which one may have t=∞forS/negationslash= 0. In other words there could be singularity free models for which horizon and flatness problems naturally do not arise [7]. However, we found that in a more orthodox model of AE with a finite age of the universe, horizon and flatness problems cease to exist and, thus, there is no need to postulate, in an adhoc manner the occurrence of a brief spell of inflation. It can be shown that even if the horizon and flatness problems disappear with the idea of inflation in the present epoch, in principle, they may reappear, in future if k/negationslash= 0 and the universe were un- dergoing DE [8,9]. On the other hand, such problems do no recur for the present simple model incorporating AE. And although, the singularity and a hot early epoch lie in a finite past, in the present simple case of an orthodox model, note that the universe begins with a “whimper” (˙S= 0 infinity) rather than a “bang”( ˙S=∞). We have of course, not suggested any physics which may be driving the universe in the AE mode. This a completely different problem in its own right and many authors are addressing to it. We would simply mention here that it is possible to have practically any form of a time varying Λ and consequent desired evolution [10]. And if we consider the AE occuring due to a Λ term, which is intrinsic to the fabric of spacetime, the pres- ence of such a term may not significantly alter the local thermodynamics. Thus the relationship between Sorz and temperature could be unaltered in such a scheme. In other words, as an example, the epoch of decoupling may still be at z≈1100 as in the standard Λ-free cosmology. However the S(t) orzandtwill change. Consequently the epoch of decoupling will lie at different model depen- dent cosmic time. 2[1] S. Weinberg, “Gravitation and Cosmology” (Wiley, New York, 1972) [2] C.W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. Wheeler, “Gravita- tion”, (Freeman, San Fransisco, 1973) [3] N.A. Bachall, J.P. Ostriker, S. Perlmutter and P.J. Stei n- hardt, Science, 284, 1481 (19999) and ref. therein [4] A.H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981) [5] A.D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B 108, 389 (1982) [6] P. de. Bernardis et al., Nature, 404, 955 (2000) [7] R. Fakir, Astrophys. J. 537, 533 (2000) [8] J.R.F. Ellis, Class. Q. Grav., 5, 891 (1988) [9] J.V. Narlikar and T. Padmanabhan, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 29, 325 (1991) [10] J.M. Overduin and F.I. Cooperstock, Phys. Rev. D 58, 043506 (1998) 3

arXiv:physics/0007067v1 [physics.bio-ph] 19 Jul 2000Scaling-violation phenomena and fractality in the human po sture control systems Stefan Thurner,1,2Christian Mittermaier,3Rudolf Hanel4and Klaus Ehrenberger1 1Klinik f¨ ur HNO, Universit¨ at Wien, Austria 2Institut f¨ ur Mathematik, NuHAG, Universit¨ at Wien, Austr ia 3Klinik f¨ ur Physikalische Medizin, Universit¨ at Wien, Aus tria 4Institut f¨ ur Theoretische Physik, Universit¨ at Wien, Aus tria By analyzing the movements of quiet standing persons by mean s of wavelet statistics, we observe multiple scaling regions in the underlying body dynamics. T he use of the wavelet-variance function opens the possibility to relate scaling violations to differ ent modes of posture control. We show that scaling behavior becomes close to perfect, when correc tional movements are dominated by the vestibular system. Keywords: balance system, wavelet analysis, scaling expon ents, 1 /fnoise, multifractal PACS: 87.10.+e, 87.19.St, 87.19.Bp I. INTRODUCTION Over the last years evidence has been compiled that many phys iological systems and processes exhibit scaling laws in the corresponding time series [1], due to the existence of control mechanisms with a minimum degree of complexity. Irregularities in physiological processes may lead to scal ing violations which recently have successfully been used t o detect abnormalities of the underlying biological systems such as the human heart [2,3]. For some reason nature choose to let man walk upright. This ha s led, over time, to a highly complex balance system, which is not based on one single physical principle a lone. Balance of a normal human being is the result of a most likely nonlinear [4] superposition of sensory signal s originating from the vestibular, visual and somatosensor y systems, which govern a cascade of muscular correctional mo vements in order to maintain an upright position, for an overview see e.g. [5]. The existence of three different mec hanisms for maintaining balance provides the body with backup systems. If the vestibular system is severely damage d or not fully functioning, visual and somatosensory information will gain importance and take up for the loss. Human posture can be quantified by measuring the displacemen t of the center of pressure under the feet of a quiet standing person, leading to time-varying trajectories Fig . 1. It is known in posturography that in case of damages of one component of the balance system certain characterist ic frequency bands will change their relative weights, see e.g. [6]. Frequency bands provide a crude indicative of t ypical functional aberrations in the visual, vestibular, somatosensory and central nervous system. The visual syste m is linked to frequencies in the range of 0-0.1 Hz which dominate normal steady and undisturbed posture. Vest ibular stress and disturbances will lead to enhanced frequencies in the 0.1-0.5 Hz band; frequencies between 0.5 and 1 Hz indicate somatosensory activity and postural reflexes mediated by the lower extremities. Finally, signs f or malfunctions in the central nervous system usually correlate to high frequencies, i.e. 1 Hz and higher [6,7]. In this paper we provide first evidence that the different cont rol mechanisms, at work at their characteristic time scales, lead to different scaling behavior in the center of pr essure trajectories. By using a novel sensitive scaling measure based on wavelet statistics, we not only show that qu iet standing is a correlated noise which has been observed before [8,9] but that in normal posture the mode of t he control mechanism at work, is directly related to one of the multiple scaling regions with their characterist ic scaling exponents. Scaling is found to be close to perfect (one single scaling exponent) in the case where visual and ta ctile senses are excluded, and the vestibular system plays the dominant role. This difference in scaling behavior could be used to directly quantify the relative importance of the vestibular system in relation to the entire human balanc e system. The wavelet measure is able to capture this scaling differences from standard posturography data on an i ndividual basis. This suggests that the measure could be of clinical use in diagnostic of the functional quality of the different control mechanisms of human posture. The paper is organized as follows: In Sect. II we review the co ncept of scaling statistics and conventional methods for its quantitative treatment. We further discuss a novel wave let-variance function method. In Sect. III the experimenta l setup and the way of data acquisition are described. Results and a comparison of the different methods are presented in Sect. IV. Section V concludes with a discussion of the findi ngs and their potential clinical usefulness. 1II. METHODS To completely characterize processes from a stochastic poi nt of view, the knowledge of all possible joint probabilitie s of the various events occurring in these processes is necess ary. Fractal stochastic processes exhibit scaling in their statistics, which naturally lead to power-law behavior. Co nsider a statistic fwhich depends continuously on the scale xover which measurements are taken. Suppose the scale gets ch anged by a factor aand induces the statistics to get scaled by another factor g(a), related to the factor but independent of the original scal e: f(ax) =g(a)f(x). (1) The only nontrivial solution to this scaling equation for re al valued functions and arguments is f(x) =bg(x) withg(x) =xc, (2) for some constants bandc, e.g. [10,11]. The particular case of a fixed aadmits a more general solution, g(x;a) = xccos[2πln(x)/ln(a)] [12]. A. Scaling Measures Over the years there have been developed a vast number of stat istics to characterize stochastic processes, some which have already been applied to human posturography data. Mayb e the most direct approach to quantify scaling is to usetwo-point correlation functions of the underlying (continuous or discrete) process x(t) (variance of τ-increments): K(τ) =∝angbracketleft[x(t+τ)−x(t)]2∝angbracketrightt (3) where ∝angbracketleft.∝angbracketrighttdenotes the average over t. For processes of the kind of fractional Brownian motion the correlation K(τ) scales asK(τ)∼τ2C. ForC= 1/2 the diffusion result is obtained (Brownian motion). This me asure has been used recently to show that the dynamical process of quiet sta nding contains long term correlations, and thus can be interpreted as a correlated noise [13,8,9]. Another method frequently used to quantify scaling behavio r of time series is to analyze the corresponding (discrete) Fourier spectra , ˜X(ω) =|N/summationdisplay k=1x(k)ei2π(ω−1)(n−1)/N|2∝ωS, (4) to determine the Fourier-scaling exponent S. Fourier analysis strongly depends on the stationarity of t he underlying signals, which is often not the case for real world data. In pa rticular posturography data contains drifts originating from slow correctional movements. It is common practice in t ime series analysis to apply Fourier methods after some sort of ‘detrending’ of the signals. In the course of improving correlation measures, factors li ke the Fano andAllan factor have been proposed and applied widely for stochastic point processes [10]. Those f actors are not necessarily limited to point processes, and can be used to obtain statistical information of time series . For an overview, especially for the relations of these factors to the power-spectral density, see [11]. The basic i dea behind those and related measures is to compare sets of aggregated (over some time interval) events, rather than ju st looking at increment statistics as in the case of two-poin t correlation functions. As a further generalization of this the concept, the wavelet-variance function (WVF) has been introduced [2,3]. B. Wavelet-variance function Multiresolution wavelet analysis [14–18] has proved to be a mathematically clear and practical tool for analyzing signals at multiple scales, even in the presence of nonstati onarities [19,20], which are obviously present in the cente r of pressure time series xandy, Fig. 1b. It was shown that wavelet statistics can be used to r eveal scaling phenomena in natural systems in a more transparent way [2,21,3] than ot her methods frequently used. In a first step we transform our time series into a (two dimensi onal) space of wavelet coefficients. Technically the coefficients are obtained by carrying out the discrete wavele t transform (DWT) [14] of x: 2Wwav m,n(x) = 2−m/2/integraldisplay∞ −∞x(t)ψ(2−mt−n)dt, (5) (same fory) where the scale variable mand the translation variable nare integers. The discrete wavelet transform is evaluated at the points ( m,n) in the scale–interval-number plane. Smaller scales corre spond to more rapid variations and therefore to higher frequencies. We have carried out this transformation using a broad range o f orthonormal, compactly supported analyzing wavelets. Throughout the paper we present results for the Da ubechies 10-tap wavelet. Similar results were obtained using Mallat and Haar wavelets. Orthogonality in the DWT pro vides that the information represented at a certain scale mis disjoint from the information at other scales. Because ce rtain wavelets ψhave vanishing moments, polynomial trends in the signal are automatically eliminated in the pro cess of wavelet transformation [18,20,19]. This is salutat ory in the case of the time series xandy, as is evident from the trends apparent in Fig. 1b. Since the s ignalx(t) fluctuates in time, so too does the sequence of wavelet coefficients at any given scale, though its mean is zero since/integraltext∞ −∞ψ(t)dt= 0. In [2] it was suggested to investigate the scaling behavior o f thestatistics of the wavelet coefficients at a particular scale of the signal of interest, resulting in the wavelet-va riance function σ2 wav(m) =1 N−1N/summationdisplay n=1(Wwav m,n(x)− ∝angbracketleftWwav m,n(x)∝angbracketrightn)2∝m2∆, (6) whereNis the number of wavelet coefficients at a given scale m(N=M/2m, withMbeing the total number of sample points in the signal). ∝angbracketleftWwav m,n(x)∝angbracketrightndenotes the mean taken at a given scale. For reasonably long s ignals this quantity will be close to zero and can be neglected for practi cal purposes. It is not straight forward to relate the wavelet-variance sc aling exponent ∆ to the Fourier-scaling coefficient S. The exponent ∆ may to some extend depend on the choice of the ty pe of wavelets. However, the Allan factor when multiplied by the mean, can be seen as a special case of the WVF if the Haar wavelet is taken, and a relation to the Fourier-scaling exponent can be established [11]. Later in this work we present an empirical relation based on fractal Gaussian noise (FGN) surrogate data and on the Daubechies 10 -tap wavelets. III. DATA AND EXPERIMENTAL SETUP For measuring the movements of an upright standing person, t he person was placed on a standard posturography plate [22], which is sensitive to weight shifts. Data was gat hered on 37 healthy subjects (Age: 31 .7±6.8 years, Weight: 66.3±12.2 kg, Height: 173 .0±8.9 cm, Sex: 19 females, 18 males), who had no history of dizzine ss, have never suffered any leg injuries, nor were taking any form of medication befo re the measurements. The sample contains no subject with musculo-skeletal, neurologic or vestibular disorder . The measurements were taken with the subjects looking in the forward direction, wearing no shoes and no long pants or s kirts, to avoid tactile feedback loops along the legs. Individual tests lasted for 20 seconds as is a typical clinic al posturography standard, points were sampled at a rate of 50 Hz. The reason for keeping the measurements short is to r educe the probability that the subject would change its standing strategy (toe or hip strategy) within a single m easurement. Each subject was measured three times to ensure consistency. The output of the plate is the trajectory of the center of grav ity projected onto the xyplane, Fig. 1a. The actual measuredxandytrajectories have been shifted by their mean, x=xmeasured − ∝angbracketleftxmeasured ∝angbracketrightt(same fory). For the complete knowledge of a dynamical system the time series of t he momenta are also needed. We obtain an estimate of these by taking time derivatives (first differences) of the xandytrajectories and denote them by vx=d dtxand vy=d dty, respectively, Fig. 1c. All further analysis has been carri ed out on these position and ‘velocity’ trajectories. Figure 1d shows the phase-space plot of the y-component for t he same data. To estimate systematic measurement errors, we placed a mass of 75 kg on the platform. The resulting trajectories, which relate to vibrations of the floor and the measuring equi pment, were confined to elongations of less than 0.02 cm. A. Experiments To be able to study different modes of posture control we perfo rmed four types of measurements. In the first type the subject was asked to stand still with eyes open (eo). The r esulting movements are the bodily responses to a mixture of visual, somatosensory and vestibular input. 3In the second test the subjects were asked to close their eyes (ec), and were additionally provided darkened swimming glasses, so that no visual input could influence posture cont rol. The third and fourth test were done on a foot plate that could s way in the forward-backward ( y) direction. We refer to this as the eyes-open–moving plate (eomp) and the ey es-closed–moving plate (ecmp) tests. The experimental design of these tests was to reduce somatosensoric effects or iginating in pressure sensors of the foot. Note that in this setup the pressure on toes and heel is kept constant during th e measurement due to the moving plate: Whenever force is applied by the toes the plate moves down in the front, as it will move down in the back whenever force is exerted by the heel. While in the eomp test, visual and vestib ular systems are active, the resulting movements in the y-direction in the ecmp test will be dominated by the vestibul ar system alone. IV. RESULTS In order to relate the wavelet-scaling exponent ∆ to the more familiar Fourier-scaling exponent S, we generated fractal Gaussian noise (FGN) time series, of definite Fourie r-scaling exponent αtheory. From those time series we computed the Fourier- scaling exponent S, which should be the same as αtheory, and the wavelet-scaling exponent ∆. The results for the Daubechies 10-tap wavelets are given in T ab. I. A linear fit yields an estimate of the relation of the two scaling measures: ∆ =−(0.019 + 0.311S)∼ −S/3. (7) For eachαtheory we generated 50 FGN time series, and averaged over the extrac ted exponents. Figures 2a and 2b show σwav(x) andσwav(y) as a function of scale mfor the eo and ecmp tests of a representative subject. Time scales mcorrespond to data segments of a length of2m 50seconds1. It is seen that for the eo-case the curve is a straight line from scale two on. For the small scale s, the slope - the wavelet-scaling exponent - denoted by ∆S(x) (scale 1 to 2), is clearly less than the slopes at larger scal es ∆ L(x), indicating the onset of white noise2in the high frequency region, i.e. the small scale region. For the e cmp situation, no such scaling violation is observed, and ∆S∼∆L. We have checked that this finding is independent of whether d iscrete or continuous wavelets are used, and that it is reasonable to extract the scaling exponent ∆ Sfrom the smallest 2 scales only in the discrete case. For very large (VL) scales ( m= 6−10) we find a significant decrease in the corresponding scalin g exponent ∆ V Lcompared to ∆ Sand ∆ L. However at those large scales for our relatively short data sets (M= 1000) statistics becomes sparse and the estimates for σ2 wav(m>5) rather unreliable. These observations lead us to consider an index quantifying the degree of scaling violation, determined by the quotient of the wavelet-scaling exponents in large (∆ L) and small (∆ S) scale regions: ∆ sv= ∆ L/∆S. In Fig. 3a the mean values over the whole sample are shown for all of the m easurements (37 subjects ` a 3 times). It is clearly observable that the scaling violation measure ∆ svapproaches 1 when suppressing visual and tactile control (e cmp), and that it nicely distinguishes between the modes of posture co ntrol. In Fig. 4a we present ∆ sv(y) for all subjects for the eo and ecmp-tests. The reduction of ∆ svfrom the eo-case to the ecmp-case is apparent. This effect is l ess pronounced in thex-direction in which the plate is stable. The scatter plot in t he velocity-scaling–position-scaling-violation plane also suggests a slight positive correlation of velocity-sc aling with the index of scaling violation. We found that the two-point correlation function used on the same data set shows scaling differences similar to those reported in [8,9], but that it is not sensitive enough t o clearly distinguish between different modes of posture control. For comparison we show the quotient of the correspo nding high ( CHigh) and low ( CLow) scaling regions CHigh/CLow(y) in Fig. 3b for the same measurements. We were able to reprodu ce within errors the two-point correlation scaling values in the high and medium frequency domain of [8]. Our results are CLow(y)eo= 0.71±0.07, andCHigh(y)eo= 0.20±0.19. Also the critical time where the scaling regimes of Cchange could be confirmed to be somewhat less than a second, which corresponds to the chan ge of wavelet-scaling regimes ∆ L(y)eo= 0.85±0.1 to ∆ V L(y)eo= 0.25±0.27 at scale m= 6 (1.28 sec), see Tab. II. As for the quotient CHigh/CLowalso ∆ V L/∆Lis found to be not well suited for a separation of the standing mo des, especially not on an individual basis. Note here 1The smallest reasonable scale for the given sampling rate of 50 Hz is thus m= 1 or 1/25 sec. The reason why we did not consider smaller scales is most clearly seen for the (discre te) Haar wavelet: at scale m= 1, only two sample points will be in the support of the wavelet. At a smaller time scale ( m= 0), σ2 wav(0) would be identical to the variance of the signal. 2a slope of zero is equivalent to white noise 4that the wavelet-scaling regimes from ∆ Sto ∆ L, which are sensitive to posture control, change at scales m= 2 and 3, corresponding to about 1 /10thof a second. Our standard deviation of CHigh(y) is considerably larger than reported in [8], which is expla ined by the fact that the data length there is 4.5 times larger (90 sec) than the dat a used here. For our relatively short data segments it was not possible to reliably estimate the third scaling re gion for time scales larger than 10 seconds for all of the described methods. In this region scaling vanishes due to th e limited extend of motion [9]. Values for the various scaling exponents and the scaling vio lation quotients are gathered in Tab. II together with the kurtosis and skewness of the increment processes v(y). The latter indicate almost Gaussian distributions for th e steady plate case which changes clearly towards leptocurtic distr ibutions in the moving-plate scenario. The leptocurticity reflects the existence of periods of fast correctional movem ents followed by periods of relatively quiet standing in the moving plate scenarios. In financial time series analysis th is behavior in dynamics is referred to as volatility cluster ing. We continue by analyzing scaling behavior of the increment ( ‘velocity’) processes. In Figs. 2c and 2d, σwav(vx) andσwav(vy) demonstrate that in the eo-case the wavelet-scaling expon ents are generally small for the corresponding velocities, which means little correlation or structure. F or the ecmp-case the wavelet exponent associated to vy, ∆L(vy), is drastically enhanced, while σwav(vx) is compatible with the eo-case, as expected. This behavior was encountered in all subjects of the sample of 37 healthy test p ersons, as can be inferred from Fig. 4a. To compare the wavelet-variance method to conventional Fou rier methods, we extracted Fourier-scaling exponents S from the data. Since the original signals xandyare nonstationary, doubts on the reliability on a straight f orward use of power spectra are justified. However, already naive Fouri er spectra, after windowing, show typical 1 /fbehavior and it is possible to observe different scaling exponents in most subjects in the low ( SLow(y)) and high frequency regions (SHigh(y)). The data does not allow for a stable estimate of the degree of the corresponding scaling violation, since the inter- and intra-subject variance are high, which is refl ected in the large standard deviations in the corresponding scaling violation quotient SLow(y)/SHigh(y) in Tab. II. The Fourier-scaling exponents for SLow(y) andSHigh(y) were obtained from fits in the power spectrum in the region of 1.45 H z - 12.45 Hz and 12.45 Hz - 25 Hz respectively. We note here that within errors the relation given in eq. (7) sti ll holds approximately for the experimental data ∆ Svs. SHighand ∆ Lvs.SLow(large scales correspond to low frequencies). This could be a sign that the two different scaling regions could be successfully modeled with FGN mode ls. However since errors are large for the estimates of SHighandSLow, one should be careful in interpreting this result in terms o f the nature of the underlying processes at the different scaling regions. No problem with nonstationarity will arise when the derivat ivesvxandvyare used, and clearly 1 /fbehavior is observed. The corresponding Fourier-scaling exponents S(vy) for the individual subjects for two tests are gathered in Fig. 4b. It is clearly seen that the two tests separate in this variable,Sdrops by a factor of 3 on average. In both tests a slight decrease of the scaling exponent on age is obse rvable. We have computed cross correlation functions of x,y,vxandvycomponents. We could not find a significant dependence of one on the other for all measurements, and coul d such exclude torque effects in quiet standing in healthy subjects. Additionally we have computed the boxcounting dimension Dbcof the graphs in Fig. 1a for all subjects. The largest box was taken to be 6 ×6 cm for all measurements. The results are given in Fig. 4c. It is remarkable that in this variable, which is a measure of the static geometry of the posture trajectory, separation of the differ ent tests occurs, Tab. II. V. DISCUSSION All the conventional scaling measures used in this work were able to confirm that human posture is indeed a correlated process, and indicate that different scaling reg ions are present (multifractal). The wavelet-variance fun ction method proves to exhibit these scaling violations in a very p recise way so that it becomes possible to relate the different control mechanisms to different scaling exponents on an indi vidual basis. We show that this is even possible on very short (standard) posturography data, clearly outperformi ng the other methods. In particular we demonstrated that dominance of the vestibu lar system shows close to perfect scaling phenomena in the position time series. When visual and tactile input info rmation are superimposed on the vestibular system, scaling violations occur, pointing of course at a nonlinear interpl ay of the underlying systems and their relevant characteris tic time scales. For the ‘velocity’ time series the effect is even more pronounced since the pure vestibular system shows clear scaling, which breaks down almost completely for the s uperposition cases. The findings presented here might bear a potential for practi cal use: since the scaling exponents and scaling violation measures can be considered as tools which measure the relati ve importance of the vestibular system in comparison 5with the visual and somatosensory systems, it seems sensibl e that they provide a key for a direct measurement of the intactness of the vestibular system. Clinical practice today is to measure this intactness of the vestibular system by thermally disturbing it and measuring the resulting eye m ovements. A particular interesting subject will be an analysis, along the lines presented here, of sway data of pat ients with dizziness, which often goes hand in hand with vestibular stress or malfunction. We found first evidence that some scaling measures are age dep endent. It might be possible to quantitatively relate a loss of complexity in the posture control systems of the agi ng human to changes in scaling measures. [1] J.B. Bassingthwaighte, L.S. Liebovitch and B.J. West, F ractal Physiology (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1994). [2] S. Thurner, M.C. Feurstein and M.C. Teich, Phys. Rev. Let t.80, 1544-1547 (1998). [3] S. Thurner, M.C. Feurstein, S.B. Lowen and M.C. Teich, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5688-5691 (1998). [4] K.M. Newell, R.E.A. Van Emmerik, D. Lee and R.L. Sprague, Gait and Posture 4, 225-230 (1993). [5] J. Massion, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 4, 877-887 (1994). [6] U. Oppenheim, R. Kohen-Raz, D. Alex, A. Kohen-Raz and A. A zarya, Diabetes Care 22, 328-332 (1999). [7] R. Kohen-Raz, private communication. [8] J.J. Collins and C.J. DeLuca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73764-767 (1994). [9] C.C. Chow and J.J. Collins, Phys. Rev. E 52907-912 (1995). [10] S.B. Lowen and M.C. Teich, Fractals 3, 183-210 (1995). [11] S. Thurner, S.B. Lowen, M.C. Feurstein, C. Heneghan, H. G. Feichtinger and M.C. Teich, Fractals 5, 565-595 (1997). [12] M.F. Shlesinger and B.J. West, Phys. Rev. Lett 67, 2106-2108 (1991). [13] J.J. Collins and C.J. De Luca, Exp. Brain Res. 95, 308-318 (1993). [14] I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets (Society for In dustrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1992) . [15] S. Mallat, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 315, 69-88 (1989). [16] Y. Meyer, “Ondelettes, fonctions splines et analyses g radu´ ees,” Lectures given at the University of Torino, Ital y (1986). [17] A. Aldroubi and M. Unser eds., Wavelets in Medicine and B iology (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996). [18] A. Arneodo, G. Grasseau and M. Holschneider, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2281-2284 (1988). [19] P. Abry and P. Flandrin, in Wavelets in Medicine and Biol ogy (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996), pp. 413-437. [20] M.C. Teich, C. Heneghan, S.B. Lowen and R.G. Turcott, in Wavelets in Medicine and Biology (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996), pp. 383-412. [21] A. Marrone, A.D. Polosa, G. Scioscia, S. Stramaglia, an d A. Zenzola, Phys. Rev. E. 60, 1088-1091 (1999). [22] Data was gathered with a “Pro Balance Master” (Neurocom Intl. Inc.). 6αtheory −S ∆ 0.5 0.51(0.06) 0.14(0.02) 1.0 0.96(0.07) 0.27(0.03) 1.5 1.50(0.07) 0.45(0.02) 2.0 2.00(0.06) 0.64(0.03) 2.5 2.52(0.06) 0.73(0.04) TABLE I. Relation of Fourier-scaling exponent and the wavel et-variance exponent obtained from fractal Gaussian noise surrogate data of definite Fourier-scaling exponent αtheory. To match experimental data the noise sequences contained 1 000 samples each, averages of the exponents were taken over 50 se quences per αtheory. The numbers in brackets are standard deviations. eo ec eomp ecmp ∆L/∆S(y) 1.55(0.73) 1.46(0.66) 1.17(0.46) 1.02(0.41) ∆S(y) 0.55(0.19) 0.62(0.21) 0.76(0.22) 0.91(0.26) ∆L(y) 0.85(0.10) 0.91(0.10) 0.89(0.10) 0.92(0.11) ∆V L(y) 0.25(0.27) 0.22(0.26) 0.28(0.25) 0.34(0.28) CLow/CHigh(y) 3.67(4.00) 4.02(8.96) 3.07(2.00) 3.34(3.26) CLow(y) 0.71(0.07) 0.75(0.07) 0.71(0.06) 0.70(0.07) CHigh(y) 0.20(0.19) 0.19(0.25) 0.23(0.16) 0.21(0.18) SLow(y)/SHigh(y) 4.97(8.42) 4.20(5.57) 2.35(1.84) 1.46(0.86) SLow(y) -2.55(0.52) -3.05(0.57) -3.42(0.49) -3.85(0.42) SHigh(y) -0.51(0.77) -0.73(0.83) -1.46(0.94) -2.64(1.28) S(y) -2.06(0.21) -2.24(0.30) -2.35(0.38) -2.59(0.50) S(d/dt y ) -0.43(0.23) -0.74(0.28) -1.08(0.28) -1.50(0.21) Dbc 0.67(0.16) 0.79(0.17) 1.00(0.18) 1.35(0.14) kurtosis( d/dt y ) 3.49(1.67) 3.70(0.97) 5.34(2.42) 4.91(2.25) skewness( d/dt y ) 0.040(0.198) 0.011(0.225) 0.060(0.424) 0.036(0.394) TABLE II. Various scaling measures and kurtosis and skewnes s of the increment processes for the four different tests performed (eyes open (eo), eyes closed (ec), eyes-open–mov ing plate (eomp) and eyes-closed–moving plate (ecmp)). The value in bracket is the standard deviation over all measurements ( 3 per subject). Fits for S(y) and S(d/dty ) have been taken over the whole frequency range. 7FIG. 1. Movement of the center of gravity projected on the xy-plane (a) for open eyes, stable plate. The time evolution of the motion for the xandycomponents is shown in (b). The time derivatives represent m omentary ‘velocity’ (c). Whereas positions are clearly nonstationary for the 20 seconds time intervals , velocities are. (d) Phase-space diagram for the y-component. The form of the phase-space trajectory reminds on the Duffing osci llator with randomized phases. For clarity the plot has been smoothed by moving averages of block-size 4. FIG. 2. Wavelet scaling exponents for the eyes open (eo), (le ft column) and the eyes-closed–moving plate (ecmp), (right ) test. For the position data xandy(top line) scaling violation in eo is obvious for low scales. This violation is absent in ecmp. In the velocity data vxandvyscaling is generally low in eo, but becomes strong in the ycomponent of ecmp. FIG. 3. Comparison of the wavelet-scaling-invariance ∆ L/∆S(y) measure (a) and the corresponding correlation quotient CHigh/CLow(y) (b). In the latter there is no difference detectable in the mo de of posture control. eo, ec, eomp and ecmp refrere to the eyes open, eyes closed, eyes-open–moving pla te and eyes-closed–moving plate tests respectively. The er rorbars indicate mean standard errors. FIG. 4. Scaling measures for the whole sample of 37 healthy pe rsons. (a) velocity-scaling–position-scaling-violatio n plot. The scaling-violation measure ∆ L/∆S(y) is grouped around one for the eyes-closed–moving (ecmp) ca se, while it is larger for the eyes open test (eo). The wavelet-scaling exponent in vyis significantly larger for the ecmp than for eo. Moreover a sl ight positive correlation of velocity-scaling with position-s caling-violation is observable. (b) Fourier-scaling expo nents for velocities for all individuals ordered by age (left - young, right - old) . (d) Box counting dimension Dbcfor the same individuals. The symbols denote the means of the three identical measurement s, the errorbars are the corresponding mean standard errors . 8(a) (b) −0.5 0 0.5−0.500.5 x elongation [cm]y elongation [cm] 0 5 10 15 20−0.500.5 time [sec]elongation [cm] x y (c) (d) 0 5 10 15 20−0.100.10.2 time [sec] d/dt x, d/dt y x y −0.5 0 0.5−0.0500.05 yd/dt y FIG. 1 9eo ecmp 123450.010.11 scale mσwav (x),(y) (b) 123450.010.11 scale mσwav(d/dt x, y) (d)123450.010.11 scale mσwav (x),(y) ∆L ∆S (a)x y 123450.010.11 scale mσwav(d/dt x, y) (c) FIG. 2 10eoeceomecm11.21.41.61.8∆L/∆S(y) eoeceomecm123456CHigh/CLow(y) (a) (b) FIG. 3 11(a) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3−0.100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9 ∆L/∆S (y)∆L (d/dt y)eo ecmp (b) (c) 0 20 40−2−1.5−1−0.500.5 subject no.S (d/dt y) 0 20 400.20.40.60.811.21.41.6 subject no.Dbc FIG. 4 12

arXiv:physics/0007068v1 [physics.acc-ph] 19 Jul 2000THESPALLATIONNEUTRON SOURCE: APOWERFUL TOOLFORMATERIALSRESEARCH∗ T.E.Mason,T.A.Gabriel, R.K. Crawford, K.W.Herwig, F. Klo se,and J.F. Ankner, SNS Project, 701Scarboro Rd. Oak Ridge, TN37830 Abstract Thewavelengthsandenergiesofthermalandcoldneutrons are ideally matched to the length and energy scales in the materials that underpintechnologiesof the present and fu- ture: ranging from semiconductors to magnetic devices, composites to biomaterials and polymers. The Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) will use an accelerator to produce the most intense beamsof neutronsin the world when it is complete at the end of 2005. The project is being built by acollaborationofsixU.S.DepartmentofEnergylaborato- ries. Itwillserveadiversecommunityofusersdrawnfrom academia, industry, and government labs with interests in condensed matter physics, chemistry, engineering materi- als, biology,andbeyond. 1 INTRODUCTION Withmaterialsofeverincreasingcomplexitybecomingkey elements of the technologies underpinning industrial and economic development there is an ongoing need for tools that reveal the microscopic origins of physical, electrica l, magnetic, chemical, and biological properties. Neutron scatteringisonesuchtoolforthestudyofthestructureand dynamics of materials[1]. Neutrons are well suited to this purposeforseveralreasons: •Neutronsareelectricallyneutralleadingtopenetration depthsofcentimeters; •Neutron cross sections exhibit no regulardependence onatomicnumberandaresimilarinmagnitudeacross the periodic table giving rise to sensitivity to light el- ementsin thepresenceofheavierones; •The range of momentum transfer available allows probingofabroadrangeoflengthscales(0.1to 105˚A) important in many different materials and applica- tions; •Thermal and cold neutrons cover a range of energies sufficient to probea wide rangeof lattice or magnetic excitations; •Neutrons have magnetic moments and are thus uniquelysensitiveprobesofmagneticinteractions; •Neutrons can be polarized, allowing the cross- sections(magneticandnonmagnetic)tobeseparated; ∗Work supported by the U.S. Dept. of Energy under contract DE- AC05-00OR22725•The simplicity of the magnetic and nuclear interac- tionsmakeinterpretationofresultsstraightforward. Advances in neutron scattering have, from its earliest days, been driven by the scientific opportunitiespresented by improved source performance and instrumentation op- timized to take advantage of that performance. The Spal- lation Neutron Source represents a substantial advance in neutron source performance over any facility in the world and, together with improved instrumentation, will make possiblemeasurementsofstructureanddynamicswith un- precented intensity, resolution, and dynamic range. The accelerator complex that is the proton driver for the SNS is describedelsewhere in these proceedings. What follows is a brief summary of the Experimental Facilities that will turntheprotonsintoscience. 2 SNS EXPERIMENTAL FACILITIES 2.1 TargetSystems ThedevelopmentoftheSNSTargetSystem,includingpre- liminarydesignandresearchanddevelopment,isprogress- ing as planned. A globaloverviewof the target/instrument hall is shown in Fig. 1. The mercury-based target system, which will receive the short-pulsed, proton beam (2 MW, 1-GeV protons, 60 Hz, <1.0µs/pulse), will be located in the center of the bulk shielding. As shown in Fig. 1, theshieldingisslightlyleftofcenter,withthemaintenan ce Figure 1: Cross-sectional view of the bulk shielding, shut- ters, instruments,maintenancecells, andmercurytarget. cells to the right. The first maintenance cell will moni- tor and maintain the mercury process and pumping sys- tem. Additionally, because the system is designed to re- quire only five days for replacement of the stainless steel(SS316L) target container and because the first mainte- nance cell will allow replacement every six weeks, a good availability of neutronswill be maintained. The remaining cells will be used for storage, maintenance, and shipping of various components such as shutters, the proton beam window,andtheinnercoreplugthatholdsthemoderators. Figure 2: Cross-sectional view of the cryogenic, compos- ite, and ambient moderators and the mercury target. The protonbeamarrivesfromtheupperleftofthe drawing. A sliced section of the target, moderator, and reflector system is shown in Fig. 2 . Cryogenic moderators [super- criticallighthydrogen(H2)@19K]arelocatedonthetop of the target. The upstreambottom moderatorwill contain acompositeofsupercriticallighthydrogenandlightwater . The purpose of this composite is to increase the number of neutrons in the 100 K range. Neutrons in this energy range can be used for a multitude of applications. Prelim- inary analysis indicates that this increase could approach the neutron yield expected from a liquid methane moder- ator. The downstream bottom moderator is ambient light water. In support of the target design, we have focused our R&Dprogramonthedevelopmentofamercurytargetsys- tem and have included research in thermal shock, thermal hydraulics,materialdamageandcompatibility,andremote handling. AllofourlargeR&Dmercuryloopsarenowop- erational. The use of these loopswill yield valuable infor- mationonthermalhydraulics,remotehandling,andopera- tor requirementsand training. The enclosurestructure and partofthemercuryloopstructureareshowninFig.3. This structure is a prototypical mercury loop that will be simi- lar to the one used in the actual SNS facility. The target end is located in the left side of the enclosure. The motor and sump pump can be seen on the right side. The sys- tem, whichholdsabout20metrictonsofmercury,became operationalonOctober31,1999,andreacheditsdesignre- quirements shortly after startup. At the maximum pump speedof600rpm,themercuryflowsat arateof 30l/s. Figure 3: Target test facility showing the actual location of the target cell, mercury pump, and process loop equip- ment. Intheactualfacilitytheprotonbeamwouldbecom- ingfromthe leftside. 2.2 InstrumentSystems When SNS is complete and operating at 2 MW, it will of- fer unprecedented performance for neutron-scattering re- search, with more than an order of magnitude higher flux than any existing facility. Fig. 4 shows the layout of the SNS acceleratorcomplex,experimentalfacilities, andsup - port facilities. To realize the potential this offers for re - Figure 4: Spallation Neutron Source site plan showing the front end, linac, accumulator ring, target, instruments, a nd centrallab/officeandothersupportfacilities. search in chemistry, condensed matter physics, materials science and engineering, and biology, a world-class suite of instruments is being developed that makes optimal use of the SNS beams and that is suited to the needs of users across a broad range of disciplines. The mechanisms by which instruments are built and operated will be respon- sive to varying degrees of experience, from new graduate students and first-time neutron users to experienced users with an interest in instrument design. As a DOE user fa- cility, the SNS construction budget includes funds for an initial suite of instruments that will be available to users through a peer-reviewed proposal system. These instru- mentsarebeingselectedinconsultationwiththeusercom- munity, following advice from our Instrument OversightCommittee (IOC), and are being designed in consultation withprospectiveusersthroughInstrumentAdvisoryTeams (IATs). Weexpectthat75%ofthebeamtimeonthisinstru- ment suite will be available through the proposal system, withtheremaining25%forusebyin-housescientificstaff, for testing and calibration, for feasibility studies by use rs beforesubmissionof proposals,andforrapidresponseex- perimentsthatoccuroutsidetheregularproposalschedule . In addition to providing a fast start on instruments for SNS users, the initial instrument suite will allow the de- velopment of core technologiessuch as choppers, data ac- quisition systems, and control software that will form the basis for similar systems in other instruments. These sys- tems will be standardized where appropriate to simplify use and maintenance and to reduce costs. Full ”target-to- detector” computer simulation is being developed to opti- mize and integrate target and instrument design. In many cases,theSNSwillrequireinstrumenttechnologiesbeyond the current state of the art. Consequently, our construc- tion budget for instruments is supplemented by a signifi- cant R&D program, which will allow developmentof new technologies that will form the basis for the initial instru - ment suite and provide room for growth. Although the current instrumentation budget allows for 10 or 11 best- in-class neutron-scattering instruments, a total of 24 can be accommodated on the high-power target station. Over time, newinstrumentswill be builtfortheadditionalbeam linesas partofthe normaloperatinglife ofthe SNS. How- ever, to achieve full utilization of SNS, with the possibil- ity of servingthefocusedresearchneedsof groupswilling to commit to building and operating neutron instruments, it is desirable to provide for instrumentation built by In- strument Development Teams (IDTs) that may or may not include SNS as a member. IDTs would provide at least partial funding for an instrument and would receive dedi- cated beam time in return for their financial commitment. Foraninstrumentfullyfunded(includingoperation)bythe IDT,upto75%ofbeamtimecouldbereservedfortheIDT, with the remainder open to general users. The basic prin- ciples by which instruments are approved for SNS are the same,whichevermodeofaccessisinvolved. Themaincri- teriaforinstrumentselectionarethescientificprograman d the need for the unique capabilities of the SNS. The SNS is committed to seamless user access and instrument opti- mizationacrossthefacility. Instrumentsshouldbe builto n the beam line that best suits their requirements,andaccess for users should be uniform across the facility, indepen- dent of the funding source for the instrument. Guidelines for instrument team proposals that will facilitate fair and systematic evaluation are being developed in consultation with our advisory committees as well as the broader user community. The instrument team proposal process will advance in twophases: aninitialletterofintentfollowedbyadetaile d proposal. The letter of intent will broadly outline the pro- posal with sufficient detail for evaluatingthe scientific po - tential, funding mechanism(s), and management plan. Anapproved letter of intent would be followed by a more de- tailed proposal. The IOC, as well as expertreview, will be involvedattheappropriatestage. Similarguidelineswoul d befollowedforother(nonscattering)usesoftheSNSfacil- ities,withthemodificationthatreviewwouldbebytheSci- entificAdvisoryCommittee,supplementedbysubjectmat- ter experts (because the IOC is a neutron-scatteringexpert panel). Such potential uses of the SNS would also be sub- ject totheconditionthattheynotcompromisetheneutron- scatteringmissionoftheSNS andthatthefundingmustbe incremental to the project and cover all incurred costs. In addition to project-funded instruments (with an IAT) and totally externally funded instruments (with an IDT), there isapossibilityforhybridarrangementsthatwouldbenego- tiated on a case-by-case basis with the understanding that fundinglevelanddedicatedbeamtime arecommensurate. Therearecurrentlythreeinstrumentsthathavebeenrec- ommended for construction as part of the SNS Project. These are shown in Fig. 5 together with other instruments underconsiderationandaredescribedbrieflybelow. Figure 5: Schematic instrument suite for the SNS. The actual instrumentation will be determined in consultation with theusercommunity. High Resolution Backscattering Spectrometer A mechanism for achieving high energy resolution in inelas- tic scattering is to make use of Bragg scattering close to the backscattering condition to determine the final wave- lengthofneutronsscatteredfromthesample. Withapulsed source, time-of-flight is used to determine the incident neutron energy. [2, 3, 4] The SNS instrument is a near- backscattering, crystal-analyzer spectrometer designed to provide extremely high-energy resolution ( ¯hω= 2.2µeV FWHM, elastic). The design requires a long initial guide section of 84 m from moderator to sample to achieve the timing resolutionnecessaryto achievethe desired δω. The scattering chamber design is illustrated in Fig. 6. Neu- trons focused onto the sample by the supermirror funnel scatter towards the analyzer crystals. The strained, per- fect silicon (111) crystals reflect neutrons with a narrow distribution of energies centered at 2.082µeV onto the de- tectors. The design is optimized for quasi-elastic scat- tering but will provide 0.1% resolution in energy trans- fer¯hω, up to ¯hω= 18meV. This spectrometer will pro-videanunprecedenteddynamicrangeneartheelastic peak of−258µeV < ¯hω < 258µeV, about seven times that of comparablereactor-basedinstruments. For experiments that require the full dynamic range available at reactor- based instruments (or greater), we expect this spectrome- ter to have an effective count rate of 100 times that of the currentbest spectrometers. Figure 6: View of the scattering chamber of the backscat- tering spectrometer. With the analyzer crystals located 2. 5 m from the sample, the chamber will have a diameter of approximately6m. Reflectometers Neutron reflectometry is the study of elastic scattering from surfaces and interfaces at glancin g angles. Itprovidesstructuralinformationaboutsurfacea nd near surface atomic and magnetic order. [5] Two reflec- tometers are being considered for installation on a single beamlineatSNS,onefeaturinganincidentpolarizedbeam for the study of magnetic materials and one with a hori- zontal sample surface to facilitate the study of liquids (se e Fig. 7). Both instruments will use advanced neutron op- tics. Supermirror-coated microguide beam benders elim- inate fast-neutron and gamma backgrounds. Tapered su- permirrorguidestransporthighfluxtothesampleposition. The incident optics and bandwidthchoppersystem deliver (λ >2.5˚A) neutrons to the sample at repetition rates of 60,30,or20Hz. Runningat60Hz,theinstrumentswillbe capable of measuring reflectivities of R <10−9, an order- of-magnitude improvement over the best existing instru- ments. Similar or greater improvementsin data-collection rateshaveexcitingimplicationsforkineticstudies. The polarized-beam reflectometer employs a vertical sample geometry to accommodate large superconducting magnetsand other ancillary equipment. In additionto col- lectingdatainreflectiongeometry,theinstrumentwillhav e adetectorbankathighanglesfordiffractionstudies. Useo f a Drabkin-flipper-type beam conditioning device and dif- ferent polarizer, analyzer, and spin-flipper options are th e objectsofa vigorousR&D effort. Figure 7: Three-dimensional representation of the reflec- tometry beamlines, viewed from the detectors looking to- wardsthecryogenicmoderator. Ontheleftisthepolarized beam reflectometer (vertical surface), on the right the liq- uidsreflectometer(horizontalsurface) The liquids instrument features a novel design that uses the broad angular dispersion produced by the tapered guide. By sampling different incident angles (5-15) with beam-defining slits and using the relatively narrow wave- length bandwidth available at 60 Hz, we can efficiently cover a large range of momentum (hQ) transfer. Opera- tion in this mode uses all of the source flux and combines thecountingefficiencyofafixed-wavelengthreflectometer with thewideQ coverageofabroadbandinstrument. 3 CONCLUSIONS The Spallation NeutronSource will be the world’s leading facilityforstudiesofthestructureanddynamicsofmateri - alsusingthermalandcoldneutrons. Itleveragesstateofth e art accelerator technology, to deliver a high power (more than a factor of 12 times ISIS, currently the world’s most intense pulsed spallation source), high reliability tool t o physicists, chemists, biologists, and engineers. When it i s fullyinstrumenteditwillsupport1000-2000usersperyear drawn from universities, industry, and governmentlabora- toriesintheU.S.andabroad. Ultimatelyitwillsupporttwo targetstations,operatingatdifferentfrequenciesandpo wer levels, doubling the capacity and more than doubling its scientific performance. 4 REFERENCES [1] Fora recent review see: MRS Bulletin, 24, 1999. [2] P.M.Gehring, D.A.Neumann, PhysicaB 241, 64 (1997). [3] B. Frick, A. Magerl, Y. Blanc, R. Rebesco, Physica B 234- 236, 1177 (1997). [4] C.J.Carlileand M.A.Adams, Physica B 182, 431 (1992). [5] J.F.AnknerandG.P.Flecher,J.Magn.Magn.Mater. 200,741 (1999).

3P1|e> =1987 nm |g2> =3P2 657 nm1946 nmJ=123 12 J=0 |g1> =1S0|g2>hk|e> Pump Laser |g1> Losses: collisions, reabsorption, outcoupling, etc.(a) (b) J. Grünert et al., fig.150100 150 2000.00.40.81.21.6 Time [ms] τ = 14,6 ms J. Grünert et al., fig.3J. Grünert et al., fig.2422 nm 1978 nmCa Zeeman Cooler(b)3D1,2,3 3P0,1,2 1S01P11D2 1978 nm J=123 12 J=0 Rγ23 γ31γ34 γ41γ2 13 4422 nmΓ(a) xyz1Ultracold Metastable Calcium Ensembles, a Medium for Matter Wave Amplification ? J. Grünert, G. Quehl, V. Elman, and A. Hemmerich Institut für Laserphysik, Universität Hamburg, Jungiusstraße 9, D-20355 Hamburg, Germany We propose an experimental implementation of matter wave amplification by optical pumping (MAO) with metastable calcium atoms. First experimental results indicate that pumping rates can be significantly higher than in previous experimental schemes and let it appear promising that the threshold condition for generation of degeneracy can be reached. PACS Numbers: 32.80.Qk,32.80.Pj, 03.75.–b The effect of stimulated emission of photons in a laser is based on their bosonic nature. Consequently, an analogous phenomenon should occur for other bosonic particles as for example atoms with integer total angular momentum. In fact, in the late nineties, following the first experimental observation of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) [ 1], schemes for matter wave amplification have begun to attract interest and theoretical models for matter wave analogs of the laser have been proposed, which employ the mechanism of optical pumping as a key element [ 2,3]. Matter wave amplification by optical pumping (MAO) might open a novel path for a continous production of coherent matter waves at rates exceeding those accessible via BEC by orders of magnitude. A fundamental prerequisite for MAO are atoms which provide a so called Λ-level scheme comprised of two stable, energetically well separated ground states, |g1> and |g2>, and one excited state |e>, that allows for controlled optical pumping of atomic population from |g2> to |g1> as sketched in fig.1(a). By means of laser cooling techniques a dense cold sample of atoms is continuously produced in the reservoir state |g2> which plays the role of the inverted medium in a laser. Atoms in |g1> are captured inside a potential well resulting for example from a far-detuned optical dipole trap. These atoms play the role of the photons stored in some cavity mode in a laser. Optical pumping, i.e. excitation to |e> and subsequent spontaneous emission can transfer atoms from |g2> into |g1>. Due to the bosonic character of the atoms the probability to end up in the motional state | g1, ν> scales with the number Nν of atoms already populating | g1, ν>. This is analogous to the effect of stimulated emission in a laser. If the optical pumping rate for some motional state | g1, ν> exceed the losses, a macroscopic population of this state should arise. The motional ground state | g1, 0> typically experiences the highest pumping and the lowest loss rate and should thus exhibit the lowest threshold for degeneracy. Unfortunately, in traps with an extension much larger than the wavelength of the optical pumping photons with respect to all three dimensions it is argued that the threshold condition for the onset of degeneracy cannot be reached due to the possible reabsorption of the optical pumping photons which heat the trapped atomic sample [ 4]. Traps, which are microscopic in three dimensions reach threshold at such high densities that three-body collisions may yield formation of molecules, and large pumping rates are difficult to achieve due to the small trap volume. One way out of this dilemma may be to surpass the threshold in a microscopic trap and subsequently to perform an adiabatic increase of the trap volume [ 5]. A simpler way around the reabsorption problem is to employ strongly asymmetric traps from2which the optical pumping photons can escape with a high probability [3]. We can roughly estimate under which conditions threshold should be reached despite of reabsorption, for example, in the case of a cylindrical trap of radius r and length l. The probability for an atom in |e> within the trap volume V= π r2 l (with motional degrees of freedom described by a thermal state with temperature T and thermal de Broglie wavelength λth) to be transfered to the motional ground state of |g1> in an optical pumping process, is approximately given by a Franck-Condon factor which can be estimated to be Pgain = λth3/V [6]. This has to be compared with the reabsorption probability which is approximated by Ploss = σ/l2, where σ = λp2/2π denotes the resonant absorption cross section for the optical pumping photons of wavelength λp. Thus, Pgain ≥ Ploss is equivalent to 2 * (λth / λp)2 * (λth /r) * (l/r) ≥ 1 which can be satisfied for the realistic combination of parameters ( λth / λp) = 10-1, (λth /r) = 5*10-2 and (l/r) = 1000. With this trap geometry in mind we neglect the reabsorption problem in order to roughly estimate the condition for the onset of degeneracy, finding that the pump rate per trap volume V into state |e> should exceed R0 ≈ κ V/ λth3 where κ is the ground state loss rate [6]. At 1 microkelvin λth is typically on the order of 50 nm and loss rates can be as low as 10-2 s–1 yielding R0/V = 8*1013 cm–3s–1. For the cylindric trap considered above this corresponds to R0 = 2,5*107 atoms/s into the trap volume. To realize such high transfer rates of atoms at such low temperatures presents a serious challenge for the experimentalist. In this article we discuss an experimental implementation of atomic matter wave amplification by optical pumping based on ultracold metastable calcium atoms. Calcium owing to its two valence electrons provides a singlet and a triplet ground state, well separated energetically, which possess sufficiently long life times in order to serve as the states |g1> and |g2> respectively (see fig.1(b)). The extremely long life time of the 3P2 triplet state (the reservoir state |g2>) results because the transition to the singlet ground state violates two selection rules concerning spin and total angular momentum. An infrared laser of approximately 2 µm wavelength can optically pump atoms from 3P2 via 3D2 to 3P1, which has a sufficiently short life time of approximately 0,4 ms and thus may serve as the excited state |e> in fig.1(b). The transition at 657 nm connecting 3P1 to the singlet ground state 1S0 (which serves as the trapped state |g1>) is the famous red intercombination line. The singlet ground state has zero total angular momentum and possesses no further degeneracy. It is basically insensitive against magnetic fields but can be trapped in a far-detuned dipole trap. As a notable advantage over similar schemes employing noble gases (e.g. argon [ 7]) which also provide two stable electronic states, in our scheme the |g1> atoms are real ground state atoms such that no heating collisions (e.g. hyperfine structure changing collisions, Penning ionization etc.) can arise. The experimental task is to produce cold calcium atoms at 1 µK in the 3P2 triplet state at a rate in the 1010 s–1 range. Figure 2 indicates how this goal can be achieved in two steps by laser cooling. Calcium possesses an extremely efficient Doppler-cooling line at 422 nm (natural linewidth Γ/2π = 34,6 MHz) connecting the singlet ground state 1S0 to the singlet 1P1 state. This can be exploited to load a magneto-optic trap (MOT) from a Zeeman-cooled atomic beam. Capture rates above 1011 atoms/s should present no principle difficulty. As is indicated in fig.2(a), the 1S0 → 1P1 transition is not a perfectly closed transition, a feature shared by all earth alkaline atoms with the exception of magnesium. The excited 1P1 singlet level may decay into the lower lying 1D2 state with a rate of approximately γ1 = 2180 sec-1. About 78 % of these atoms return to the ground state in approximately 3 ms either directly in a quadrupol transition or via the 3P1 state. These atoms are not captured during this time and thus the capture volume of the MOT has to be sufficiently large (> 1 cm) to recycle them when they return to the ground state. The remaining 22 % are transfered to the metastable 3P2 state and cannot be recaptured at all. This is the dominant trap loss mechanism. For the case3of perfect recycling the production rate of 3P2 atoms equals the capture rate of the MOT and thus can exceed 1011 atoms/s. The 3P2 atoms are produced at a temperature given by the Doppler cooling limit for the 422 nm cooling line of 0,8 mK. This is sufficiently low to capture them in a second MOT employing the closed 3P2 → 3D3 transition at 1978 nm. The narrow linewidth of this transition of about 57 kHz together with its long wavelength provides a very low Doppler-limit of only 1,3 µK and a recoil limit of 122 nK. Moreover, the J=2 →J=3 level structure allows for polarization gradient cooling, such that temperatures around a microkelvin should be obtained. For implementation of the MAO scheme we can not tolerate the presence of 422 nm photons which would excite atoms to 1P1 (cf. fig.1(b)). Thus, a cold beam has to be extracted from the 1978 nm MOT into a second vacuum chamber (with background pressure below 10– 11 mBar) and recaptured in a second MOT at 1978 nm (cf. fig. 2(b)). This has been established as a standard procedure in laser cooling experiments with alkalis and should not yield any difficulties like loss of atoms. Note that the 1978 nm MOT is compatible with the synchronous operation of a dipole trap for the singlet ground state. While for alkalis magneto-optic trapping has become a standard technique that has been established in many laboratories, yet only a few research groups have operated such traps for earth alkaline elements. Traps for strontium [ 8,9,10], calcium [8, 11,12] and magnesium [ 13] have been reported with numbers of trapped atoms in the 107 range. In contrast to experiments with alkalis which are readily addressed by semiconductor lasers and which can be captured from room temperature vapors, experiments with earth alkaline atoms have involved highly complex atomic beam machines and laser systems. We have built a compact and efficient experimental setup consisting of a miniature vacuum apparatus and all solid state light sources. Our experiment is sketched in fig. 2(b). Calcium atoms are evaporated at 600 °C through 45 adjacent channels of 10 mm length and 1 mm diameter. The atoms are decelerated by a laser beam counter propagating the atoms inside a 30 cm long tapered solenoid. A spatially varying magnetic field compensates the Doppler shift of the decelerated atoms. After the slowing magnet an additional coil operated with reversed direction of current serves to produce a relative minimum of the magnetic field in order to decouple the atoms from the slowing process at a defined velocity. During this decoupling process the atoms are cooled by a two-dimensional optical molasses along the transverse directions. Subsequently, the cold atoms enter a small vacuum chamber, where three retro- reflected laser beams (Ø = 10 mm) are superposed with a quadrupole magnetic field in order to form a magneto-optic trap. The trapping region is located at 50 cm distance from the apertures of the source and 12 cm down stream from the transverse optical molasses. The necessary 422 nm photons are made with an all solid state laser system starting off with a 5 W commercial frequency-doubled YAG system pumping a miniaturized Ti:Sapphire laser which produces 800 mW dual frequency output at 845 nm [ 14]. The two frequencies separated by about 1 GHz are used for sum frequency mixing in a KNbO3 crystal. yielding a total blue output of 150 mW consisting of 3 frequency components. The sum frequency component (approximately 100 mW) is used for the experiment. About 70 mW is directed the Zeeman slower and the transverse molasses while 30 mW are used for the MOT beams, which has been found to yield optimized results. The available 422 nm power is limited by thermal lenses typical for KNbO3 already at modest fundamental powers. Increasing the available fundamental power to 2 W and using LBO for sum frequency mixing should lead to a factor five increase of 422 nm output. In order to generate narrow band radiation at 1978 nm we have developed a miniaturized, Tm:YAG laser based on the same design criteria as used for our Ti:Sapphire laser. We obtain up to 90 mW of tunable dual frequency radiation [15], far more than needed for our infrared MOT.4For interpretation of our experimental findings we employ a rate equation model including the levels 1S0, 1P1, 1D2 , 3P1, indicated in this order by 1,2,3,4 in fig. 2(a). Neglecting collisional loss due to hot background atoms the rate equations are: N1 = R – W N 1 + (Γ + W) N 2 + η γ31 N3 + η γ41 N4 N2 = W N 1 – (Γ + γ23 + W) N 2 (1)N3 = γ23 N2 – (γ34 + γ31 + γ) N3 N4 = γ34 N3 – γ41 N4 Here Ni is the number of trapped atoms in state i, η is the fraction of those atoms which after having decayed back to the ground state can be recaptured while R and W denote the 422 nm MOT-capture rate and the excitation rate for the 1S0 → 1P1 transition. The steady state solution of eq.1 yields the production rate R = N3γ of 3P2 atoms to be R = ε R, where R denotes the 422 nm MOT capture rate and ε = γ [(1 - η) ( γ34 + γ31)+ γ]–1 varies between 0,22 and 1 depending on whether there is no ( η=0) or perfect ( η=1) recycling. If Γ >> W and γ41 >> γ34, the population N2 evolves much more rapidly than N1 and thus takes its steady state value according to the temporary value of N1. Thus we may approximate N2/N1 ≈ W/(Γ+ γ23 +W). Similarly, if γ41 >> γ34, we may approximate N4/N3 ≈ γ34/ γ41. With these approximations we obtain reduced rate equations (2)∂ ∂tN2 N3 = –σγ23(γ31+γ34)ση γ23 –γ31–γ34–γ N2 N3 + σR 0 , where σ = s /(2 + s) and s is the saturation parameter of the1S0 → 1P1 transition. Setting R=0 in eq.2 we expect a biexponential decay of the populations N2 and N3 with decay rates given by the eigenvalues of the right hand side matrix which are approximately given by (3)γ± = 1 2 (σγ23+γ31+γ34+γ) ± γ23(γ31+γ34)ση if the matrix elements a,b,c,d satisfy (a–d)2 << bc. Using eq.3 we may obtain a value for η and thus a value for ε by measuring the dominant component γ– in the decay of N2. This quantity is directly accessible in our experiment via observation of the 422 nm fluorescence of the decaying MOT after shutting off the atomic beam cooling. The observed decay within about 15 ms (cf. fig.3) lets us estimate the recycling efficiency η to be 91 %, the corresponding value of ε is 0,76. Here we have assumed s = 0,5 which corresponds to the laser power and trapping beam diameters in our MOT. The rate R can be directly connected to the number N(1P1) of atoms in the 1P1 -state by R = N(1P1) * γ23 γ (γ31 +γ34 + γ )–1 = N(1P1) * 480 s–1. The value of N(1P1) is given by P/ hωΓ, where P is the total 422 nm fluorescence power and hω is the energy per 422 nm photon. In our preliminary experiments we find that N(1P1) = 2,2*107 and correspondingly R = 1,1*1010 s–1. Assuming again s = 0,5 we have 1,4 *108 calcium atoms in the 1S0 ground state. This represents the highest number of trapped calcium atoms reported so far, although important components of our experiment are not yet optimized. The diameters of our trapped atomic samples are typically 5 mm corresponding to a density of about 2,1 *109 atoms/cm3. The sizes of the trapped samples decrease with decreasing loading rate, showing that our MOT operates in the density limited regime [16]. Similarly as in ref.[12], we have used 672 nm light in order to repump 3 1D2 -atoms via 5 1P1 back to the singlet ground state 4 1S0 and thus close the dominant loss channel of our MOT. First experiments show only a factor 3 to 4 increase of 422 nm fluorescence in5presence of 672 nm light, in contrast to the expectations of a factor of about 100 if the residual trap loss would result from collisions with hot background atoms. This may be partly due to incomplete repumping because of inhomogeneous magnetic broadening and the existence of non-coupling states for the repumping transition. Moreover, one may speculate that, similarly as shown for strontium in [10], collisions between cold 4 1S0 and 4 1P1 atoms may yield an additional loss channel owing to the effect of radiative redistribution [ 17] which can be particularly efficient due to the existence of a metastable 1Πg molecular state for the calcium dimer. Our experimental observations make it appear promising to surpass the threshold for quantum degeneracy in future experiments as is seen from the following estimation. Under the realistic assumption that we can in fact cool all mestastable atoms down to 1 µK into a volume of Vcool = 1 mm3, we may estimate the number of atoms pumped per second into our example cylinder trap (radius r = 1 µm, length l = 1 mm, volume V= πr2l ) to be R0 = γ R V/Vcool where γ = 2,6*103 s–1 is the natural decay rate of the 3P1 triplet state. This yields R0 = 9 *107 s–1 which is to be compared with the theoretical threshold rate R0 = 2,5*107 s–1. Collisions between cold metastable atoms, particularly in the presence of infrared photons, might complicate the situation providing a challenge of future theoretical work to investigate these. In summary, we have proposed a novel experimental implementation for matter wave amplification by optical pumping employing laser cooled metastable calcium atoms. A bichromatic magneto-optic trap is under construction that operates in two successive cooling steps. Preliminary experiments show more than 108 trapped ground state calcium atoms and a production rate of more than 1010 metastable calcium atoms per second. These results make it look promising that the threshold condition for the generation of quantum degeneracy can be approached. We are grateful to A. Diening and G. Huber for providing us with a Tm:YAG crystal and valuable expertise. We thank F. Renzoni for constructive critical remarks. This work has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungs gemeinschaft under contract numbers DFG- He2334/2.1 and DFG-He2334/2.3. Figure Captions Fig.1 (a). Scheme for matter wave amplification by optical pumping (cf. ref.2). (b). Our implementation of the scheme in (a) with calcium atoms. The transition rate for optical pumping metastable atoms into the singlet ground state is limited by the 3P1 life time of 0,4 ms. Fig.2 (a). Scheme for a bichromatic magneto-optic trap. The atoms, loaded from a laser cooled atomic beam at a rate R, are precooled by the strong Doppler-cooling line at 422 nm. Through leakage from the excited 1P1 state to 1D2 the metastable state 3P2 is populated. Cooling via the narrow band infrared transition at 1978 nm should yield temperatures around 1 microkelvin. Atoms being transfered to 1D2 are no longer trapped. About 78% of these atoms return to the ground state in typically 3 ms. These atoms can be recycled by providing a sufficiently large capture volume of the MOT. The levels labeled with numbers in square boxes are accounted for in eq.1.6(b). Schematic of experimental apparatus. The atomic beam enters the MOT region under an angle of 30 ° with respect to the z-axis and slightly displaced with respect to the center of the MOT in order to keep the hot atoms away from the cold ones. Fig.3 The number of trapped atoms is plotted versus observation time. At the time indicated by the arrow, the Zeeman slowing laser beam is turned off. The decay of the trapped sample with a time constant of 14,6 ms is observed. References 1. M. H. Anderson et al., Science 269, 198 (1995). K. Davis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995). 2. R. Spreeuw, T. Pfau, U. Janicke, and M. Wilkens, Europhys. Lett 32, 469 (1995). 3. M. Olshanii, Y. Castin, and J. Dalibard, in A. Sasso, M. Inguscio, M. Allegrini, eds., Procs. of the XII Conference on laser spectroscopy, world scientific, New York (1995). 4. U. Janicke and M. Wilkens, Europhys. Lett. 35, 561 (1996). 5. I. Cirac and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2466 (1996). I. Castin, J. Cirac, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5305 (1998). 6. U. Janicke and M. Wilkens, Adv. Mol. Opt. Phys. 4 (1999). 7 . H. Gauck, M. Hartl, D. Schneble, H. Schnitzler, T. Pfau, and J. Mlynek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5298 (1998). 8. T. Kurosu and F. Shimizu, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, L2127-L2129 (1992). 9. H. Katori, T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1116 (1999). 10 . T. P. Dineen, K. R. Vogel, E. Arimondo, J. L. Hall, A. Gallagher, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1216 (1999). 11. T. Kisters, K. Zeiske, F. Riehle, and J. Helmcke, Appl. Phys. B 59, 89 (1994). 12 . C. W. Oates, F. Bondu, R. W. Fox, and L. Hollberg, Eur.Phys.J. D 7, 449 (1999). 13. F. Ruschewitz, J. L. Peng, H. Hinderthür, N. Schaffrath, K. Sengstock, and W. Ertmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3173 (1998). 14. C. Zimmermann, V. Vuletic, A. Hemmerich, L. Ricci, T. Hänsch, Opt. Lett. 20, 297 (1995). 15. G. Quehl, J. Grünert, V. Elman, and A. Hemmerich, to be published (2000). 16. C. G. Townsend, et al., Phys. Rev. A 52, 1423 (1995). 17. A. Gallagher and D. E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 957 (1989).

arXiv:physics/0007070v1 [physics.data-an] 20 Jul 2000Predictability, complexity and learning William Bialek,1Ilya Nemenman,1,2and Naftali Tishby1,3 1NEC Research Institute, 4 Independence Way, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 2Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, N ew Jersey 08544 3Institute for Computer Science, and Center for Neural Compu tation Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel September 26, 2013 We define predictive information Ipred(T) as the mutual information between the past and the future of a time series. Three qualitatively different behaviors are found in the limit of large observation times T:Ipred(T) can remain finite, grow logarithmically, or grow as a fractional power law. If t he time series allows us to learn a model with a finite number of parameters, then Ipred(T) grows logarithmically with a coefficient that counts the dimension ality of the model space. While logarithmic growth of related information the oretic quantities has been found in previous work on learning, power law growth has not been seen in this context. We find that it is associated, for example, wi th the learning of infinite parameter (or nonparametric) models such as cont inuous functions with smoothness constraints. There are connections betwee n the predictive in- formation and measures of complexity that have been defined b oth in learning theory and in the analysis of physical systems through stati stical mechanics and dynamical systems theory. Further, in the same way that entr opy provides the unique measure of available information consistent with so me simple and plausi- ble conditions, we argue that the divergent part of Ipred(T) provides the unique measure for the complexity of dynamics underlying a time ser ies. Finally, we discuss how these ideas may be useful in different problems in physics, statistics, and biology. 1Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Fundamentals 5 3 Learning and predictability 9 3.1 A test case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2 Learning a parameterized distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.3 Learning a parameterized process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 8 3.4 Taming the fluctuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.5 Beyond finite parameterization: general considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.6 Beyond finite parameterization: example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 4Ipredas a measure of complexity 29 4.1 Complexity of statistical models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 4.2 Complexity of dynamical systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 4.3 A unique measure of complexity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 5 Discussion 36 6 References 41 21 Introduction There is an obvious interest in having practical algorithms for predicting the future, and there is a correspondingly large literature on t he problem of time series extrapolation.1But prediction is both more and less than extrapolation: we might be able to predict, for example, the chance of rain in the coming week even if we cannot extrapolate the trajectory of tempera ture fluctuations. In the spirit of its thermodynamic origins, information the ory (Shannon 1948) characterizes the potentialities and limitations of all po ssible prediction algo- rithms, as well as unifying the analysis of extrapolation wi th the more general notion of predictability. Specifically, we can define a quant ity—the predictive information —that measures how much our observations of the past can tell us about the future. The predictive information characterize s the world we are observing, and we shall see that this characterization is cl ose to our intuition about the complexity of the underlying dynamics. Prediction is one of the fundamental problems in neural comp utation. Much of what we admire in expert human performance is predictive i n character—the point guard who passes the basketball to a place where his tea mmate will arrive in a split second, the chess master who knows how moves made no w will influence the end game two hours hence, the investor who buys a stock in a nticipation that it will grow in the year to come. More generally, we gather sen sory information not for its own sake but in the hope that this information will guide our actions (including our verbal actions). But acting takes time, and s ense data can guide us only to the extent that those data inform us about the state of the world at the time of our actions, so the only components of the incomin g data that have a chance of being useful are those that are predictive. Put bl untly, nonpredictive information is useless to the organism , and it therefore makes sense to isolate the predictive information. It will turn out that most of the inf ormation we collect over a long period of time is nonpredictive, so that isolatin g the predictive information must go a long way toward separating out those fe atures of the sensory world that are relevant for behavior. One of the most important examples of prediction is the pheno menon of generalization in learning. Learning is formalized as findi ng a model that ex- plains or describes a set of observations, but again this is u seful precisely (and only) because we expect this model will continue to be valid: in the language of learning theory [see, for example, Vapnik (1998)] an anim al can gain selec- tive advantage not from its performance on the training data but only from its performance at generalization. Generalizing—and not “ove rfitting” the training data—is precisely the problem of isolating those features o f the data that have predictive value (see also Bialek and Tishby, in preparatio n). Further, we know 1The classic papers are by Kolmogoroff (1939, 1941) and Wiener (1949), who essentially solved all the extrapolation problems that could be solved b y linear methods. Our understand- ing of predictability was changed by developments in dynami cal systems, which showed that apparently random (chaotic) time series could arise from si mple deterministic rules, and this led to vigorous exploration of nonlinear extrapolation alg orithms (Abarbanel et al. 1993). For a review comparing different approaches, see the conference proceedings edited by Weigend and Gershenfeld (1994). 3that the success of generalization hinges on controlling th e complexity of the models that we are willing to consider as possibilities. Fin ally, learning a model to describe a data set can be seen as an encoding of those data, as emphasized by Rissanen (1989), and the quality of this encoding can be me asured using the ideas of information theory. Thus the exploration of learning problems should provide us with explicit links among the concepts of entropy , predictability, and complexity . The notion of complexity arises not only in learning theory, but also in several other contexts. Some physical systems exhibit more complex dynamics than others (turbulent vs. laminar flows in fluids), and some syste ms evolve toward more complex states than others (spin glasses vs. ferromagn ets). The problem of characterizing complexity in physical systems has a subs tantial literature of its own [for an overview see Bennett (1990)]. In this context several authors have considered complexity measures based on entropy or mut ual information, although as far as we know no clear connections have been draw n among the measures of complexity that arise in learning theory and tho se that arise in dynamical systems and statistical mechanics. An essential difficulty in quantifying complexity is to disti nguish complexity from randomness. A true random string cannot be compressed a nd hence re- quires a long description; it thus is complex in the sense defi ned by Kolmogorov (1965, Li and Vit´ anyi 1993, Vit´ anyi and Li 2000), yet the ph ysical process that generates this string may have a very simple description. Bo th in statistical me- chanics and in learning theory our intuitive notions of comp lexity correspond to the statements about complexity of the underlying proces s, and not directly to the description length or Kolmogorov complexity. Our central result is that the predictive information provides a general mea- sure of complexity which includes as special cases some relevant concepts from learning theory and from dynamical systems. While the work o n the complexity of models in learning theory rests specifically on the idea th at one is trying to infer a model from data, the predictive information is a prop erty of the data (or, more precisely, of an ensemble of data) itself without refer ence to a specific class of underlying models. If the data are generated by a process i n a known class but with unknown parameters, then we can calculate the predi ctive information explicitly and show that this information diverges logarithmically with the size of the data set we have observed ; the coefficient of this divergence counts the number of parameters in the model, or more precisely the effec tive dimension of the model class, and this provides a link to known results o f Rissanen and others. But our approach also allows us to quantify the compl exity of processes that fall outside the finite dimensional models of conventio nal learning theory, and we show that these more complex processes are characterized by a power–law rather than a logarithmic divergence of the predictive info rmation . By analogy with the analysis of critical phenomena in statis tical physics, the separation of logarithmic from power–law divergences, together with the measurement of coefficients and exponents for these divergen ces, allows us to define “universality classes” for the complexity of data str eams. The power–law or nonparametric class of processes may be crucial in real wo rld learning tasks, 4where the effective number of parameters becomes so large tha t asymptotic results for finitely parameterizable models are inaccessib le in practice. There is empirical evidence that simple physical systems can genera te dynamics in this complexity class, and there are hints that language also may fall in this class. Finally, we argue that the divergent components of the predictive information provide a unique measure of complexity that is consistent with certain simple requirements. This argument is in the spirit of Shannon’s or iginal derivation of entropy as the unique measure of available information. We b elieve that this uniqueness argument provides a conclusive answer to the que stion of how one should quantify the complexity of a process generating a tim e series. With the evident cost of lengthening our discussion, we have tried to give a self–contained presentation that develops our point of vi ew, uses simple ex- amples to connect with known results, and then generalizes a nd goes beyond these results.2Even in cases where at least the qualitative form of our resul ts is known from previous work, we believe that our point of view elucidates some issues that may have been less the focus of earlier studies. L ast but not least, we explore the possibilities for connecting our theoretica l discussion with the experimental characterization of learning and complexity in neural systems. 2 Fundamentals The problem of prediction comes in various forms, as noted ab ove. Information theory allows us to treat the different notions of prediction on the same footing. The first step is to recognize that all predictions are probab ilistic—even if we can predict the temperature at noon tomorrow, we should prov ide error bars or confidence limits on our prediction. The next step is to remem ber that, even before we look at the data, we know that certain futures are mo re likely than others, and we can summarize this knowledge by a prior probab ility distribution for the future. Our observations on the past lead us to a new, m ore tightly con- centrated distribution, the distribution of futures condi tional on the past data. Different kinds of predictions are different slices through o r averages over this conditional distribution, but information theory quantifi es the “concentration” of the distribution without making any commitment as to whic h averages will be most interesting. Imagine that we observe a stream of data x(t) over a time interval −T < t <0; let all of these past data be denoted by the shorthand xpast. We are interested in saying something about the future, so we want t o know about the datax(t) that will be observed in the time interval 0 <t<T′; let these future data be called xfuture. In the absence of any other knowledge, futures are drawn from the probability distribution P(xfuture), while observations of particular past dataxpasttell us that futures will be drawn from the conditional distr ibution P(xfuture|xpast). The greater concentration of the conditional distributi on can 2Some of the basic ideas presented here, together with some co nnections to earlier work, can be found in brief preliminary reports (Bialek 1995; Bial ek and Tishby 1999). The central results of the present work, however, were at best conjectur es in these preliminary accounts. 5be quantified by the fact that it has smaller entropy than the p rior distribution, and this reduction in entropy is Shannon’s definition of the i nformation that the past provides about the future. We can write the average o f thispredictive information as Ipred(T,T′) =/angbracketleftBigg log2/bracketleftbiggP(xfuture|xpast) P(xfuture)/bracketrightbigg/angbracketrightBigg (1) =−∝an}bracketle{tlog2P(xfuture)∝an}bracketri}ht − ∝an}bracketle{tlog2P(xpast)∝an}bracketri}ht −[−∝an}bracketle{tlog2P(xfuture,xpast)∝an}bracketri}ht], (2) where ∝an}bracketle{t···∝an}bracketri}htdenotes an average over the joint distribution of the past an d the future,P(xfuture,xpast). Each of the terms in Eq. (2) is an entropy. Since we are interes ted in predictability or generalization, which are associated wi th some features of the signal persisting forever, we may assume stationarity or in variance under time translations. Then the entropy of the past data depends only on the duration of our observations, so we can write −∝an}bracketle{tlog2P(xpast)∝an}bracketri}ht=S(T), and by the same argument −∝an}bracketle{tlog2P(xfuture)∝an}bracketri}ht=S(T′). Finally, the entropy of the past and the future taken together is the entropy of observations on a win dow of duration T+T′, so that −∝an}bracketle{tlog2P(xfuture,xpast)∝an}bracketri}ht=S(T+T′). Putting these equations together, we obtain Ipred(T,T′) =S(T) +S(T′)−S(T+T′). (3) In the same way that the entropy of a gas at fixed density is prop ortional to the volume, the entropy of a time series (asymptotically) is proportional to its duration, so that lim T→∞S(T)/T=S0; entropy is an extensive quantity. But from Eq. (3) any extensive component of the entropy cancels i n the computation of the predictive information: predictability is a deviation from extensivity . If we writeS(T) =S0T+S1(T), then Eq. (3) tells us that the predictive information is related onlyto the nonextensive term S1(T). We know two general facts about the behavior of S1(T). First, the correc- tions to extensive behavior are positive, S1(T)≥0. Second, the statement that entropy is extensive is the statement that the limit lim T→∞S(T) T=S0 (4) exists, and for this to be true we must also have lim T→∞S1(T) T= 0. (5) Thus the nonextensive terms in the entropy must be subextensive, that is they must grow with Tless rapidly than a linear function. Taken together, these f acts guarantee that the predictive information is positive and s ubextensive. Further, if we let the future extend forward for a very long time, T′→ ∞, then we can measure the information that our sample provides about the e ntire future, Ipred(T) = lim T′→∞Ipred(T,T′) =S1(T). (6) 6If we have been observing a time series for a (long) time T, then the total amount of data we have taken in is measured by the entropy S(T), and at largeTthis is given approximately by S0T. But the predictive information that we have gathered cannot grow linearly with time, even if we are making predictions about a future which stretches out to infinity. A s a result, of the total information we have taken in by observing xpast, only a vanishing fraction is of relevance to the prediction: lim T→∞Predictive Information Total Information=Ipred(T) S(T)→0. (7) In this precise sense, most of what we observe is irrelevant t o the problem of predicting the future.3 Consider the case where time is measured in discrete steps, s o that we have seenNtime points x1,x2,···,xN. How much have we learned about the un- derlying pattern in these data? The more we know, the more effe ctively we can predict the next data point xN+1and hence the fewer bits we will need to describe the deviation of this data point from our predictio n: our accumulated knowledge about the time series is measured by the degree to w hich we can compress the description of new observations. On average, t he length of the code word required to describe the point xN+1, given that we have seen the previousNpoints, is given by ℓ(N) =−∝an}bracketle{tlog2P(xN+1|x1,x2,···,xN)∝an}bracketri}htbits, (8) where the expectation value is taken over the joint distribu tion of all the N+ 1 points,P(x1,x2,···,xN,xN+1). It is easy to see that ℓ(N) =S(N+ 1)−S(N)≈∂S(N) ∂N. (9) As we observe for longer times, we learn more and this word len gth decreases. It is natural to define a learning curve that measures this imp rovement. Usually we define learning curves by measuring the frequency or costs of errors; here the cost is that our encoding of the point xN+1is longer than it could be if we had perfect knowledge. This ideal encoding has a length wh ich we can find by imagining that we observe the time series for an infinit ely long time, ℓideal= limN→∞ℓ(N), but this is just another way of defining the extensive component of the entropy S0. Thus we can define a learning curve Λ(N)≡ℓ(N)−ℓideal (10) =S(N+ 1)−S(N)− S0 =S1(N+ 1)−S1(N) ≈∂S1(N) ∂N=∂Ipred(N) ∂N, (11) 3We can think of Eq. (7) as a law of diminishing returns: althou gh we collect data in proportion to our observation time T, a smaller and smaller fraction of this information is useful in the problem of prediction. These diminishing retu rns are not due to a limited lifetime, since we calculate the predictive information assuming tha t we have a future extending forward to infinity. A senior colleague points out that this is an argu ment for changing fields before becoming too expert. 7and we see once again that the extensive component of the entr opy cancels. It is well known that the problems of prediction and compress ion are related, and what we have done here is to illustrate one aspect of this c onnection. Specif- ically, if we ask how much one segment of a time series can tell us about the future, the answer is contained in the subextensive behavio r of the entropy. If we ask how much we are learning about the structure of the time series, then the natural and universally defined learning curve is related ag ain to the subexten- sive entropy: the learning curve is the derivative of the pre dictive information. This universal learning curve is connected to the more conve ntional learning curves in specific contexts. As an example (cf. Section 3.1), consider fitting a set of data points {xn,yn}with some class of functions y=f(x;α),where theαare unknown parameters that need to be learned; we also allow for some Gaussian noise in our observation of the yn. Here the natural learning curve is the evolution of χ2for generalization as a function of the number of examples. Within the approximations discussed below, it is straightf orward to show that asNbecomes large, ∝an}bracketle{tχ2(N)∝an}bracketri}ht=1 σ2∝an}bracketle{t[y−f(x;α)]2∝an}bracketri}ht →2Λ(N) + 1, (12) whereσ2is the variance of the noise. Thus a more conventional measur e of performance at learning a function is equal to the universal learning curve de- fined purely by information theoretic criteria, and this in t urn is controlled by subextensive terms in the entropy. Different quantities related to the subextensive entropy ha ve been discussed in several contexts. For example, the code length ℓ(N) has been defined as a learning curve in the specific case of neural networks (Oppe r and Haussler 1995) and has been termed the “thermodynamic dive” (Crutchfi eld and Shalizi 1998) and “ Nthorder block entropy” (Grassberger 1986). Mutual informati on between all of the past and all of the future (both semi–infini te) is known also as the “excess entropy,” “effective measure complexity,” “s tored information,” and so on [see Shalizi and Crutchfield (1999) and references t herein, as well as the discussion below]. If the data allow a description by a model with a finite number of parameters, then mutual information betwee n the data and the parameters is of interest, and this is also the predictive in formation about all of the future; some special cases of this problem have been di scussed by Opper and Haussler (1995) and by Herschkowitz and Nadal (1999). Wh at is important is that the predictive information or subextensive entropy is rela ted to all these quantities , and that it can be defined for any process without a reference to a class of models . It is this universality that we find appealing, and this univ ersality is strongest if we focus on the limit of long observation time s. Qualitatively, in this regime ( T→ ∞) we expect the predictive information to behave in one of three different ways: it may either stay finite, or grow to in finity together withT; in the latter case the rate of growth may be slow (logarithmi c) or fast (sublinear power). The first possibility, lim T→∞Ipred(T) = constant, means that no matter how long we observe we gain only a finite amount of information abo ut the future. 8This situation prevails, for example, when the dynamics are too regular: for a purely periodic system, complete prediction is possible on ce we know the phase, and if we sample the data at discrete times this is a finite amou nt of information; longer period orbits intuitively are more complex and also h ave largerIpred, but this doesn’t change the limiting behavior lim T→∞Ipred(T) = constant. Alternatively, the predictive information can be small whe n the dynamics are irregular but the best predictions are controlled only b y the immediate past, so that the correlation times of the observable data are finit e [see, for example, Crutchfield and Feldman (1997)]. Imagine, for example, that we observe x(t) at a series of discrete times {tn}, and that at each time point we find the value xn. Then we can always write the joint distribution of the Ndata points as a product, P(x1,x2,···,xN) =P(x1)P(x2|x1)P(x3|x2,x1)···. (13) For Markov processes, what we observe at tndepends only on events at the previous time step tn−1, so that P(xn|{x1≤i≤n−1}) =P(xn|xn−1), (14) and hence the predictive information reduces to Ipred=/angbracketleftBigg log2/bracketleftbiggP(xn|xn−1) P(xn)/bracketrightbigg/angbracketrightBigg . (15) The maximum possible predictive information in this case is the entropy of the distribution of states at one time step, which in turn is boun ded by the logarithm of the number of accessible states. To approach this bound th e system must maintain memory for a long time, since the predictive inform ation is reduced by the entropy of the transition probabilities. Thus system s with more states and longer memories have larger values of Ipred. More interesting are those cases in which Ipred(T) diverges at large T. In physical systems we know that there are critical points wher e correlation times become infinite, so that optimal predictions will be influenc ed by events in the arbitrarily distant past. Under these conditions the predi ctive information can grow without bound as Tbecomes large; for many systems the divergence is logarithmic, Ipred(T→ ∞)∝lnT. Long range correlation also are important in a time series where we can learn some underlying rules. It w ill turn out that when the set of possible rules can be described by a finite numb er of parameters, the predictive information again diverges logarithmicall y, and the coefficient of this divergence counts the number of parameters. Finally, a faster growth is also possible, so that Ipred(T→ ∞)∝Tα, and we shall see that this behavior emerges from, for example, nonparametric learning problem s. 3 Learning and predictability Learning is of interest precisely in those situations where correlations or associ- ations persist over long periods of time. In the usual theore tical models, there 9is some rule underlying the observable data, and this rule is valid forever; exam- ples seen at one time inform us about the rule, and this inform ation can be used to make predictions or generalizations. The predictive inf ormation quantifies the average generalization power of examples, and we shall s ee that there is a direct connection between the predictive information and t he complexity of the possible underlying rules. 3.1 A test case Let us begin with a simple example already mentioned above. W e observe two streams of data xandy, or equivalently a stream of pairs ( x1,y1), (x2,y2),···, (xN,yN). Assume that we know in advance that the x’s are drawn independently and at random from some distribution P(x), while the y’s are noisy versions of some function acting on x, yn=f(xn;α) +ηn, (16) wheref(x;α) is a class of functions parameterized by α, andηnis some noise which for simplicity we will assume is Gaussian with some kno wn standard deviationσ. We can even start with a verysimple case, where the function class is just a linear combination of some basis functions, s o that f(x;α) =K/summationdisplay µ=1αµφµ(x). (17) The usual problem is to estimate, from Npairs{xi,yi}, the values of the pa- rameters α; in favorable cases such as this we might even be able to find an effective regression formula. We are interested in evaluati ng the predictive infor- mation, which means that we need to know the entropy S(N). We go through the calculation in some detail because it provides a model fo r the more general case. To evaluate the entropy S(N) we first construct the probability distribution P(x1,y1,x2,y2,···,xN,yN). The same set of rules apply to the whole data stream, which here means that the same parameters αapply for all pairs {xi,yi}, but these parameters are chosen at random from a distributio nP(α) at the start of the stream. Thus we write P(x1,y1,x2,y2,···,xN,yN) =/integraldisplay dKαP(x1,y1,x2,y2,···,xN,yN|α)P(α), (18) and now we need to construct the conditional distributions f or fixed α. By hypothesis each xis chosen independently, and once we fix αeachyiis correlated only with the corresponding xi, so that we have P(x1,y1,x2,y2,···,xN,yN|α) =N/productdisplay i=1[P(xi)P(yi|xi;α)]. (19) 10Further, with the simple assumptions above about the class o f functions and Gaussian noise, the conditional distribution of yihas the form P(yi|xi;α) =1√ 2πσ2exp −1 2σ2/parenleftBigg yi−K/summationdisplay µ=1αµφµ(xi)/parenrightBigg2 . (20) Putting all these factors together, P(x1,y1,x2,y2,···,xN,yN) =/bracketleftBiggN/productdisplay i=1P(xi)/bracketrightBigg/parenleftbigg1√ 2πσ2/parenrightbiggN/integraldisplay dKαP(α)exp/bracketleftBigg −1 2σ2N/summationdisplay i=1y2 i/bracketrightBigg ×exp/bracketleftBigg −N 2K/summationdisplay µ,ν=1Aµν({xi})αµαν+NK/summationdisplay µ=1Bµ({xi,yi})αµ/bracketrightBigg ,(21) where Aµν({xi}) =1 σ2NN/summationdisplay i=1φµ(xi)φν(xi),and (22) Bµ({xi,yi}) =1 σ2NN/summationdisplay i=1yiφµ(xi). (23) Our placement of the factors of Nmeans that both AµνandBµare of order unity asN→ ∞. These quantities are empirical averages over the samples {xi,yi}, and if the φµare well behaved we expect that these empirical means converge to expectation values for most realizations of the series {xi}: lim N→∞Aµν({xi}) =A∞ µν=1 σ2/integraldisplay dxP(x)φµ(x)φν(x), (24) lim N→∞Bµ({xi,yi}) =B∞ µ=K/summationdisplay ν=1A∞ µν¯αν, (25) where ¯αare the parameters that actually gave rise to the data stream {xi,yi}. In fact we can make the same argument about the terms in/summationtexty2 i, lim N→∞N/summationdisplay i=1y2 i=Nσ2/bracketleftBiggK/summationdisplay µ,ν=1¯αµA∞ µν¯αν+ 1/bracketrightBigg . (26) Conditions for this convergence of empirical means to expec tation values are at the heart of learning theory. Our approach here is first to a ssume that this convergence works, then to examine the consequences fo r the predictive information, and finally to address the conditions for and im plications of this convergence breaking down. 11Putting the different factors together, we obtain P(x1,y1,x2,y2,···,xN,yN) /tildewider→/bracketleftBiggN/productdisplay i=1P(xi)/bracketrightBigg/parenleftbigg1√ 2πσ2/parenrightbiggN/integraldisplay dKαP(α)exp [−NEN(α;{xi,yi})], (27) where the effective “energy” per sample is given by EN(α;{xi,yi}) =1 2+1 2K/summationdisplay µ,ν=1(αµ−¯αµ)A∞ µν(αν−¯αν). (28) Here we use the symbol /tildewider→to indicate that we not only take the limit of large N, but also neglect the fluctuations. Note that in this approxi mation the de- pendence on the sample points themselves is hidden in the defi nition of ¯αas being the parameters that generated the samples. The integral that we need to do in Eq. (27) involves an exponen tial with a large factor Nin the exponent; the free energy FNis of order unity as N→ ∞. This suggests that we evaluate the integral by a saddle point or steepest descent approximation [similar analyses were performed by Clarke a nd Barron (1990), by MacKay (1992), and by Balasubramanian (1997)]: /integraldisplay dKαP(α)exp [−NEN(α;{xi,yi})]≈P(αcl) ×exp/bracketleftbigg −NEN(αcl;{xi,yi})−K 2lnN 2π−1 2ln detFN+···/bracketrightbigg ,(29) where αclis the “classical” value of αdetermined by the extremal conditions ∂EN(α;{xi,yi}) ∂αµ/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleα=αcl= 0, (30) the matrix FNconsists of the second derivatives of EN, FN=∂2EN(α;{xi,yi}) ∂αµ∂αν/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleα=αcl, (31) and···denotes terms that vanish as N→ ∞. If we formulate the problem of estimating the parameters αfrom the samples {xi,yi}, then asN→ ∞ the matrixNFNis the Fisher information matrix (Cover and Thomas 1991); th e eigenvectors of this matrix gives the principal axes for the error ellipsoid in parameter space, and the (inverse) eigenvalues give the var iances of parameter estimates along each of these directions. The classical αcldiffers from ¯αonly in terms of order 1 /N; we neglect this difference and further simplify the calcu- lation of leading terms as Nbecomes large. After a little more algebra, then, 12we find the probability distribution we have been looking for : P(x1,y1,x2,y2,···,xN,yN) /tildewider→/bracketleftBiggN/productdisplay i=1P(xi)/bracketrightBigg 1 ZAP(¯α)exp/bracketleftbigg −N 2ln(2πeσ2)−K 2lnN+···/bracketrightbigg ,(32) where the normalization constant ZA=/radicalBig (2π)KdetA∞. (33) Again we note that the sample points {xi,yi}are hidden in the value of ¯αthat gave rise to these points.4 To evaluate the entropy S(N) we need to compute the expectation value of the (negative) logarithm of the probability distribution i n Eq. (32); there are three terms. One is constant, so averaging is trivial. The se cond term depends only on the xi, and because these are chosen independently from the distri bution P(x) the average again is easy to evaluate. The third term involv es¯α, and we need to average this over the joint distribution P(x1,y1,x2,y2,···,xN,yN). As above, we can evaluate this average in steps: first we choose a value of the parameters ¯α, then we average over the samples given these parameters, an d finally we average over parameters. But because ¯αis defined as the parameters that generate the samples, this stepwise procedure simplifi es enormously. The end result is that S(N) =N/bracketleftbigg Sx+1 2log2(2πeσ2)/bracketrightbigg +K 2log2N+Sα+∝an}bracketle{tlog2ZA∝an}bracketri}htα+···,(34) where ∝an}bracketle{t···∝an}bracketri}ht αmeans averaging over parameters, Sxis the entropy of the distri- bution ofx, Sx=−/integraldisplay dxP(x)log2P(x), (35) and similarly for the entropy of the distribution of paramet ers, Sα=−/integraldisplay dKαP(α)log2P(α). (36) 4We emphasize again that there are two approximations leadin g to Eq. (32). First, we have replaced empirical means by expectation values, negle cting fluctuations associated with the particular set of sample points {xi, yi}. Second, we have evaluated the average over parameters in a saddle point approximation. At least under s ome condition, both of these approximations would become increasingly accurate as N→ ∞, so that this approach should yield the asymptotic behavior of the distribution and hence the subextensive entropy at large N. Although we give a more detailed analysis below, it is worth noting here how things can go wrong. The two approximations are independent, and we could imagine that fluctuations are important but saddle point integration still works, for exa mple. Controlling the fluctuations turns out to be exactly the question of whether our finite para meterization captures the true dimensionality of the class of models, as discussed in the cl assic work of Vapnik, Chervonenkis, and others [see Vapnik (1998) for a review]. The saddle point approximation can break down because the saddle point becomes unstable or because mu ltiple saddle points become important. It will turn out that instability is exponential ly improbable as N→ ∞, while multiple saddle points are a real problem in certain classes of models, again when counting parameters doesn’t really measure the complexity of the mod el class. 13The different terms in the entropy Eq. (34) have a straightfor ward interpre- tation. First we see that the extensive term in the entropy, S0=Sx+1 2log2(2πeσ2), (37) reflects contributions from the random choice of xand from the Gaussian noise iny; these extensive terms are independent of the variations in parameters α, and these would be the only terms if the parameters were not va rying (that is, if there were nothing to learn). There also is a term which reflects the entropy of variations in the parameters themselves, Sα. This entropy is not invariant with respect to coordinate transformations in th e parameter space, but the term ∝an}bracketle{tlog2ZA∝an}bracketri}htαcompensates for this noninvariance. Finally, and most interestingly for our purposes, the subextensive piece of t he entropy is dominated by a logarithmic divergence, S1(N)→K 2log2N(bits). (38) The coefficient of this divergence counts the number of parame ters independent of the coordinate system that we choose in the parameter spac e. Furthermore, this result does not depend on the set of basis functions {φµ(x)}. This is a hint that the result in Eq. (38) is more universal than our simple e xample. 3.2 Learning a parameterized distribution The problem discussed above is an example of supervised lear ning: we are given examples of how the points xnmap intoyn, and from these examples we are to induce the association or functional relation between xandy. An alternative view is that pair of points ( x,y) should be viewed as a vector /vector x, and what we are learning is the distribution of this vector. The probl em of learning a distribution usually is called unsupervised learning, but in this case supervised learning formally is a special case of unsupervised learnin g; if we admit that all the functional relations or associations that we are try ing to learn have an element of noise or stochasticity, then this connection bet ween supervised and unsupervised problems is quite general. Suppose a series of random vector variables {/vector xi}are drawn independently from the same probability distribution Q(/vector x|α), and this distribution depends on a (potentially infinite dimensional) vector of parameter sα. As above, the parameters are unknown, and before the series starts they ar e chosen randomly from a distribution P(α). With no constraints on the densities P(α) orQ(/vector x|α) it is impossible to derive any regression formulas for param eter estimation, but one can still calculate the leading terms in the entropy of th e data series and thus the predictive information. We begin by writing, by ana logy with Eq. (18), P(/vector x1,/vector x2,···,/vector xN) =/integraldisplay dKαP(α)N/productdisplay i=1Q(/vector xi|α). (39) 14Now suppose as before that we know the parameters ¯αthat gave rise to the particular data {/vector xi}. We can write P(/vector x1,···,/vector xN) =N/productdisplay j=1Q(/vector xj|¯α)/integraldisplay dKαP(α)N/productdisplay i=1/bracketleftbiggQ(/vector xi|α) Q(/vector xi|¯α)/bracketrightbigg =N/productdisplay j=1Q(/vector xj|¯α)P(α)/integraldisplay dKαexp [−NEN(α;{/vector xi})],(40) EN(α;{/vector xi}) = −1 NN/summationdisplay i=1ln/bracketleftbiggQ(/vector xi|α) Q(/vector xi|¯α)/bracketrightbigg . (41) As before we expect empirical means to converge to expectati on values, so that EN(α;{/vector xi}) =−/integraldisplay dDxQ(x|¯α)ln/bracketleftbiggQ(/vector x|α) Q(/vector x|¯α)/bracketrightbigg −ψ(α,¯α;{xi}), (42) whereψ→0 asN→ ∞; here we neglect ψ, and return to this term below. The second term in the free energy Eq. (42) is the Kullback–Le ibler diver- gence,DKL(¯α||α), between the true distribution characterized by paramete rs ¯αand the possible distribution characterized by α. Thus at large Nwe have P(/vector x1,/vector x2,···,/vector xN)/tildewider→N/productdisplay j=1Q(/vector xj|¯α)/integraldisplay dKαP(α)exp [−NDKL(¯α||α)],(43) where again the notation /tildewider→reminds us that we are not only taking the limit of largeNbut also making another approximation in neglecting fluctua tions. By the same arguments as above we can proceed (formally) to comp ute the entropy of this distribution, and we find S(N)≈ S 0·N+S(a) 1(N), (44) S0=/integraldisplay dKαP(α)/bracketleftbigg −/integraldisplay dDxQ(/vector x|α)log2Q(/vector x|α)/bracketrightbigg ,and (45) S(a) 1(N) = −/integraldisplay dK¯αP(¯α)log2/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay dKαP(α)e−NDKL(¯α||α)/bracketrightbigg . (46) HereS(a) 1is an approximation to S1that neglects fluctuations ψ. This is the same as the annealed approximation in the statistical mecha nics of disordered systems, as has been used widely in the study of supervised le arning problems (Seung et al. 1992). The extensive term S0, Eq. (45), is the average entropy of a distribution in our family of possible distributions, generalizing the res ult of Eq. (37). The subextensive terms in the entropy are controlled by the Ndependence of the partition function Z(¯α;N) =/integraldisplay dKαP(α)exp [−NDKL(¯α||α)], (47) 15andS1(N) =−∝an}bracketle{tlog2Z(¯α;N)∝an}bracketri}ht¯αis analogous to the free energy. Since what is important in this integral is the Kullback–Leibler (KL) d ivergence between different distributions, it is natural to ask about the densi ty of models that are KL divergence Daway from the target ¯α, ρ(D;¯α) =/integraldisplay dKαP(α)δ[D−DKL(¯α||α)]; (48) note that this density could be very different for different ta rgets. The density of divergences is normalized because the original distribu tion over parameter space,P(α), is normalized, /integraldisplay dDρ(D;¯α) =/integraldisplay dKαP(α) = 1. (49) Finally, the partition function takes the simple form Z(¯α;N) =/integraldisplay dDρ(D;¯α)exp[−ND]. (50) We recall that in statistical mechanics the partition funct ion is given by Z(β) =/integraldisplay dEρ(E)exp[−βE], (51) whereρ(E) is the density of states that have energy E, andβis the inverse tem- perature. Thus the subextensive entropy in our learning pro blem is analogous to a system in which energy corresponds to the Kullback–Leib ler divergence relative to the target model, and temperature is inverse to t he number of exam- ples. As we increase the length Nof the time series we have observed, we “cool” the system and hence probe models which approach the target; the dynamics of this approach is determined by the density of low energy st ates, that is the behavior of ρ(D;¯α) asD→0. The structure of the partition function is determined by a co mpetition be- tween the (Boltzmann) exponential term, which favors model s with small D, and the density term, which favors values of Dthat can be achieved by the largest possible number of models. Because there (typicall y) are many param- eters, there are very few models with D→0. This picture of competition between the Boltzmann factor and a density of states has been emphasized in previous work on supervised learning (Haussler et al. 1996) . The behavior of the density of states, ρ(D;¯α), at small Dis related to the more intuitive notion of dimensionality. In a parameterize d family of distribu- tions, the Kullback–Leibler divergence between two distri butions with nearby parameters is approximately a quadratic form, DKL(¯α||α)≈1 2/summationdisplay µν(¯αµ−αµ)Fµν(¯αν−αν) +···, (52) where Fis the Fisher information matrix. Intuitively, if we have a r easonable parameterization of the distributions, then similar distr ibutions will be nearby 16in parameter space, and more importantly points that are far apart in parameter space will never correspond to similar distributions; Clar ke and Barron (1990) refer to this condition as the parameterization forming a “s ound” family of distributions. If this condition is obeyed, then we can appr oximate the low D limit of the density ρ(D;¯α): ρ(D;¯α) =/integraldisplay dKαP(α)δ[D−DKL(¯α||α)] ≈/integraldisplay dKαP(α)δ/bracketleftBigg D−1 2/summationdisplay µν(¯αµ−αµ)Fµν(¯αν−αν)/bracketrightBigg =/integraldisplay dKαP(¯α+U ·ξ)δ/bracketleftBigg D−1 2/summationdisplay µΛµξ2 µ/bracketrightBigg , (53) where Uis a matrix that diagonalizes F, (UT· F · U )µν= Λµδµν. (54) The delta function restricts the components of ξin Eq. (53) to be of order√ D or less, and so if P(α) is smooth we can make a perturbation expansion. After some algebra the leading term becomes ρ(D→0;¯α)≈P(¯α)2πK/2 Γ(K/2)(detF)−1/2D(K−2)/2. (55) Here, as before, Kis the dimensionality of the parameter vector. Computing the partition function from Eq. (50), we find Z(¯α;N→ ∞)≈f(¯α)·Γ(K/2) NK/2, (56) wheref(¯α) is some function of the target parameter values. Finally, t his allows us to evaluate the subextensive entropy, from Eqs. (46, 47): S(a) 1(N) = −/integraldisplay dK¯αP(¯α)log2Z(¯α;N) (57) →K 2log2N+···(bits), (58) where ···are finite as N→ ∞ . Thus, general K–parameter model classes have the same subextensive entropy as for the simplest examp le considered in the previous section. To the leading order, this result is independent even of the prior distribution P(α) on the parameter space, so that the predictive information seems to count the number of parameters under so me very general conditions. Although Eq. (58) is true under a wide range of conditions, th is cannot be the whole story. Much of modern learning theory is concerned with the fact that counting parameters is not quite enough to characteriz e the complexity of a model class; the naive dimension of the parameter space Kshould be viewed in 17conjunction with the pseudodimension (also known as the sha ttering dimension or Vapnik–Chervonenkis dimension dVC), which measures capacity of the model class, and with the phase space dimension d, which accounts for volumes in the space of models (Vapnik 1998, Opper 1994). Both of these dime nsions can differ from the number of parameters in several ways. One poss ibility is that dVCis infinite when the number of parameters is finite, a problem d iscussed below. Another possibility is that the determinant of Fis zero, and hence dVCanddare both smaller than the number of parameters because we hav e adopted a redundant description. It is possible that this so rt of degeneracy occurs over a finite fraction but not all of the parameter spac e, and this is one way to generate an effective fractional dimensionality. One can imagine multifractal models such that the effective dimensionality varies continuously over the parameter space, but it is not obvious where this wou ld be relevant. Finally, models with d < d VC<∞are also possible [see, for example, Opper (1994)], and this list probably is not exhaustive. The calculation above, Eq. (55), lets us actually define the phase space dimension through the exponent in the small DKLbehavior of the model density, ρ(D→0;¯α)∝D(d−2)/2, (59) and thendappears in place of Kas the coefficient of the log divergence in S1(N) (Clarke and Barron 1990, Opper 1994). However, this simple conclusion can fail in two ways. First, it can happen that a macroscopic w eight gets accumulated at some nonzero value of DKL, so that the small DKLbehavior is irrelevant for the large Nasymptotics. Second, the fluctuations neglected here may be uncontrollably large, so that the asymptotics ar e never reached. Since controllability of fluctuations is a function of dVC(see Vapnik 1998 and later in this paper), we may summarize this in the following w ay. Provided that the small DKLbehavior of the density function is the relevant one, the coefficient of the logarithmic divergence of Ipredmeasures the phase space or the scaling dimension dand nothing else. This asymptote is valid, however, only forN≫dVC. It is still an open question whether the two pathologies tha t can violate this asymptotic behavior are related. 3.3 Learning a parameterized process Consider a process where samples are not independent, and ou r task is to learn their joint distribution Q(/vector x1,···,/vector xN|α). Again, αis an unknown parameter vector which is chosen randomly at the beginning of the serie s. Ifαis aK dimensional vector, then one still tries to learn just Knumbers and there are still Nexamples, even if there are correlations. Therefore, altho ugh such problems are much more general than those considered above, it is reas onable to expect that the predictive information is still measured by ( K/2)log2Nprovided that some conditions are met. One might suppose that conditions for simple results on the p redictive in- formation are very strong, for example that the distributio nQis a finite order 18Markov model. In fact all we really need are the following two conditions: S[{/vector xi}|α]≡ −/integraldisplay dN/vector xQ({/vector xi}|α) log2Q({/vector xi}|α) →NS0+S∗ 0;S∗ 0=O(1), (60) DKL[Q({/vector xi}|¯α)||Q({/vector xi}|α)]→NDKL(¯α||α) +o(N). (61) Here the quantities S0,S∗ 0, andDKL(¯α||α) are defined by taking limits N→ ∞ in both equations. The first of the constraints limits deviat ions from extensivity to be of order unity, so that if αis known there are no long range correlations in the data—all of the long range predictability is associat ed with learning the parameters.5The second constraint, Eq. (61), is a less restrictive one, a nd it ensures that the “energy” of our statistical system is an ext ensive quantity. With these conditions it is straightforward to show that the results of the previous subsection carry over virtually unchanged. With t he same cautious statements about fluctuations and the distinction between K,d, anddVC, one arrives at the result: S(N) = S0·N+S(a) 1(N), (62) S(a) 1(N) =K 2log2N+···(bits), (63) where ···stands for terms of order one. Note again that for the results Eq. (63) to be valid, the process considered is not required to be a fini te order Markov process. Memory of all previous outcomes may be kept, provid ed that the accumulated memory does not contribute a divergent term to t he subextensive entropy. It is interesting to ask what happens if the condition in Eq. ( 60) is violated, so that there are long range correlations even in the conditi onal distribution Q(/vector x1,···,/vector xN|α). Suppose, for example, that S∗ 0= (K∗/2)log2N. Then the subextensive entropy becomes S(a) 1(N) =K+K∗ 2log2N+···(bits). (64) We see the that the subextensive entropy makes no distinctio n between pre- dictability that comes from unknown parameters and predict ability that comes from intrinsic correlations in the data; in this sense, two m odels with the same K+K∗are equivalent. This, actually, mustbe so. As an example, consider a chain of Ising spins with long range interactions in one dime nsion. This system can order (magnetize) and exhibit long range correlations, and so the predic- tive information will diverge at the transition to ordering . In one view, there is no global parameter analogous to α, just the long range interactions. On 5Suppose that we observe a Gaussian stochastic process and we try to learn the power spectrum. If the class of possible spectra includes ratios o f polynomials in the frequency (rational spectra) then this condition is met. On the other h and, if the class of possible spectra includes 1 /fnoise, then the condition may not be met. For more on long rang e correlations, see below. 19the other hand, there are regimes in which we can approximate the effect of these interactions by saying that all the spins experience a mean field which is constant across the whole length of the system, and then form ally we can think of the predictive information as being carried by the mean fie ld itself. In fact there are situations in which this is not just an approximati on, but an exact statement. Thus we can trade a description in terms of long ra nge interactions (K∗∝ne}ationslash= 0, butK= 0) for one in which there are unknown parameters describ- ing the system but given these parameters there are no long ra nge correlations (K∝ne}ationslash= 0,K∗= 0). The two descriptions are equivalent, and this is captur ed by the subextensive entropy.6 3.4 Taming the fluctuations The preceding calculations of the subextensive entropy S1are worthless unless we prove that the fluctuations ψare controllable. In this subsection we are going to discuss when and if this, indeed, happens. We limit t he discussion to analysis of fluctuations in the case of finding a probability d ensity (Section 3.2); the case of learning a process (Section 3.3) is very similar. Clarke and Barron (1990) solved essentially the same proble m. They did not make a separation into the annealed and the fluctuation term, and the quantity they were interested in was a bit different from ours, but, int erpreting loosely, they proved that, modulo some technical assumptions on diffe rentiability of functions in question, the fluctuation term always approach es zero. However, they did not investigate the speed of this approach, and we be lieve that, by doing so, they missed some important qualitative distincti ons between differ- ent problems that can arise due to a difference between danddVC. In order to illuminate these distinctions, we here go through the tro uble of analyzing fluctuations all over again. Returning to Eqs. (40, 42) and the definition of entropy, we ca n write the entropyS(N) exactly as S(N) = −/integraldisplay dK¯αP(¯α)/integraldisplayN/productdisplay j=1[d/vector xjQ(/vector xj|¯α)] ×log2/bracketleftBiggN/productdisplay i=1Q(/vector xi|¯α)/integraldisplay dKαP(α) e−NDKL(¯α||α)+Nψ(α,¯α;{/vector xi})/bracketrightBigg . This expression can be decomposed into the terms identified a bove, plus a new contribution to the subextensive entropy that comes from th e fluctuations alone, S(f) 1(N): S(N) = S0·N+S(a) 1(N) +S(f) 1(N), 6There are a number of interesting questions about how the coe fficients in the diverging predictive information relate to the usual critical expone nts, and we hope to return to this problem in a later paper. 20S(f) 1=−/integraldisplay dK¯αP(¯α)N/productdisplay j=1[d/vector xjQ(/vector xj|¯α)] ×log2/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplaydKαP(α) Z(¯α;N)e−NDKL(¯α||α)+Nψ(α,¯α;{/vector xi})/bracketrightbigg , (65) whereψis defined as in Eq. (42), and Zas in Eq. (47). Some loose but useful bounds can be established. First, the p redictive in- formation is a positive (semidefinite) quantity, and so the fl uctuation term may not be smaller then the value of −S(a) 1as calculated in Eqs. (58, 63). Sec- ond, since fluctuations make it more difficult to generalize fr om samples, the predictive information should always be reduced by fluctuations, so that S(f) is negative. This last statement corresponds to the fact tha t for the statistical mechanics of disordered systems, the annealed free energy a lways is less than the average quenched free energy, and may be proven rigorous ly by applying Jensen’s inequality to the (concave) logarithm function in Eq. (65); essentially the same argument was given by Opper and Haussler (1995). A re lated Jensen’s inequality argument allows us to show that the total S1(N) is bounded, S1(N)≤N/integraldisplay dKα/integraldisplay dK¯αP(α)P(¯α)DKL(¯α||α) ≡N∝an}bracketle{tDKL(¯α||α)∝an}bracketri}ht¯α,α, (66) so that if we have a class of models (and a prior P(α)) such that the average Kullback–Leibler divergence among pairs of models is finite , then the subexten- sive entropy is necessarily properly defined. Note that ∝an}bracketle{tDKL(¯α||α)∝an}bracketri}ht¯α,αincludes S0as one of its terms, so that usually S0andS1are well– or ill–defined together. Tighter bounds require nontrivial assumptions about the cl asses of distri- butions considered. The fluctuation term would be zero if ψwere zero, and ψ is the difference between an expectation value (KL divergenc e) and the corre- sponding empirical mean. There is a broad literature that de als with this type of difference (see, for example, Vapnik 1998). We start with the case when the pseudo-dimension ( dVC) of the set of prob- ability densities {Q(/vector x|α)}is finite. Then for any reasonable function F(/vector x;β), deviations of the empirical mean from the expectation value can be bounded by probabilistic bounds of the form P/braceleftBigg sup β/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1 N/summationtext jF(/vector xj;β)−/integraltext d/vector xQ(/vector x|¯α)F(/vector x;β) L[F]/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle>ǫ/bracerightBigg <M(ǫ,N)e−cNǫ2, (67) wherecandL[F] depend on the details of the particular bound used, while M(ǫ,N) depends on dVC. Typically, cis a constant of order one, and L[F] is either some moment of For the range of its variation. In our case, Fis the log–ratio of two densities, so that L[F] may be assumed bounded for almost allβwithout loss of generality in view of Eq. (66). In addition, M(ǫ,N) is finite at zero, and grows at most subexponentially in both arg uments. Bounds 21of this form may have different names in different contexts: Gl ivenko–Cantelli, Vapnik–Chervonenkis, Hoeffding, Chernoff, ...; for review s ee Vapnik (1998) and the references therein. To start the proof of finiteness of S(f) 1in this case, we first show that only the region α≈¯αis important when calculating the inner integral in Eq. (65) . This statement is equivalent to saying that at large values of α−¯αthe KL diver- gence almost always dominates the fluctuation term, that is, the contribution of sequences of {/vector xi}with atypically large fluctuations is negligible (atypical ity is defined as ψ≥δ, whereδis some small constant independent of N). Since the fluctuations decrease as 1 /√ N[see Eq. (67)], and DKLis of order one, this is plausible. To show this, we bound the logarithm in Eq. (65) byNtimes the supremum value of ψ. Then we realize that the averaging over ¯αand{/vector xi}is equivalent to integration over all possible values of the flu ctuations. The worst case density of the fluctuations may be estimated by different iating Eq. (67) with respect to ǫ(this brings down an extra factor of Nǫ). Thus the worst case contribution of these atypical sequences is S(f),atypical 1 ∼/integraldisplay∞ δdǫN2ǫ2M(ǫ)e−cNǫ2∼e−cNδ2≪1 for largeN. (68) This bound lets us focus our attention on the region α≈¯α. We expand the exponent of the integrand of Eq. (65) around this point and pe rform a simple Gaussian integration. In principle, large fluctuations mig ht lead to an instability (positive or zero curvature) at the saddle point, but this is atypical and therefore is accounted for already. Curvatures at the saddle points of both numerator and denominator are of the same order, and throwing away unimpor tant additive and multiplicative constants of order unity, we obtain the f ollowing result for the contribution of typical sequences: S(f),typical 1 ∼/integraldisplay dK¯αP(¯α)dN/vector x/productdisplay jQ(/vector xj|¯α)N(BA−1B) ; (69) Bµ=1 N/summationdisplay i∂logQ(/vector xi|¯α) ∂¯αµ,∝an}bracketle{tB∝an}bracketri}ht/vector x= 0 ; (A)µν=1 N/summationdisplay i∂2logQ(/vector xi|¯α) ∂¯αµ∂¯αν,∝an}bracketle{tA∝an}bracketri}ht/vector x=F. Here∝an}bracketle{t···∝an}bracketri}ht/vector xmeans an averaging with respect to all /vector xi’s keeping ¯αconstant. One immediately recognizes that BandAare, respectively, first and second derivatives of the empirical KL divergence that was in the ex ponent of the inner integral in Eq. (65). We are dealing now with typical cases. Therefore, large devi ations of A fromFare not allowed, and we may bound Eq. (69) by replacing A−1with F−1(1+δ), whereδagain is independent of N. Now we have to average a bunch of products like ∂logQ(/vector xi|¯α) ∂¯αµ(F−1)µν∂logQ(/vector xj|¯α) ∂¯αν(70) 22over all/vector xi’s. Only the terms with i = j survive the averaging. There are K2Nsuch terms, each contributing of order N−1. This means that the total contribution of the typical fluctuations is bounded by a numb er of order one and does not grow with N. This concludes the proof of controllability of fluctuations fordVC<∞. One may notice that we never used the specific form of M(ǫ,N), which is the only thing dependent on the precise value of the dimension. A ctually, a more thorough look at the proof shows that we do not even need the st rict uniform convergence enforced by the Glivenko–Cantelli bound. With some modifications the proof should still hold if there exist some a priori improbable values of αand ¯αthat lead to violation of the bound. That is, if the prior P(α) has sufficiently narrow support, then we may still expect fluctuations to be un important even for VC–infinite problems. A proof of this can be found in the realm of the Structural Risk Minimization (SRM) theory (Vapnik 1998). SRM theory assumes that an infini testructure Cof nested subsets C1⊂C2⊂C3⊂ ··· can be imposed onto the set Cof all admissible solutions of a learning problem, such that C=/uniontextCn. The idea is that, having a finite number of observations N, one is confined to the choices within some particular structure element Cn,n = n(N),when looking for an approximation to the true solution; this prevents overfitti ng and poor general- ization. Then, as the number of samples increases and one is a ble to distinguish within more and more complicated subsets, n grows. If dVCfor learning in any Cn,n<∞,is finite, then one can show convergence of the estimate to the true value as well as the absolute smallness of fluctuations ( Vapnik 1998). It is remarkable that this result holds even if the capacity of the whole setCis not described by a finite dVC. In the context of SRM, the role of the prior P(α) is to induce a structure on the set of all admissible densities, and the fight between t he number of samplesNand the narrowness of the prior is precisely what determines how the capacity of the current element of the structure Cn,n = n(N),grows with N. A rigorous proof of smallness of the fluctuations can be cons tructed based on well known results, as will be detailed elsewhere (Nemenm an 2000). Here we focus on the question of how narrow the prior should be so that every structure element is of finite VC–dimension, and one can guarantee even tual convergence of fluctuations to zero. Consider two examples. A variable xis distributed according to the following probability density functions: Q(x|α) =1√ 2πexp/bracketleftbigg −1 2(x−α)2/bracketrightbigg , x∈(−∞; +∞) ; (71) Q(x|α) =exp (−sinαx)/integraltext2π 0dxexp(−sinαx), x∈[0; 2π). (72) Learning the parameter in the first case is a dVC= 1 problem, while in the second case dVC=∞. In the first example, as we have shown above, one may construct a uniform bound on fluctuations irrespective of th e priorP(α). The 23second one does not allow this. Suppose that the prior is unif orm in a box 0< α < α max, and zero elsewhere, with αmaxrather large. Then for not too many sample points N, the data would be better fitted not by some value in the vicinity of the actual parameter, but by some much larger value, for which almost all data points are at the crests of −sinαx. Adding a new data point would not help, until that best, but wrong, parameter estima te is less than αmax.7So the fluctuations are large, and the predictive informatio n is small in this case. Eventually, however, data points would overwhel m the box size, and the best estimate of αwould swiftly approach the actual value. At this point the argument of Clarke and Barron would become applicable, a nd the leading behavior of the subextensive entropy would converge to its a symptotic value of (1/2)logN. On the other hand, there is no uniform bound on the value of Nfor which this convergence will occur—it is guaranteed only for N≫dVC, which is never true if dVC=∞. For some sufficiently wide priors this asymptotically correct behavior would be never reached in practice. Furthe r, if we imagine a thermodynamic limit where the box size and the number of sam ples both become large, then by analogy with problems in supervised le arning (Seung et al. 1992, Haussler et al. 1996) we expect that there can be sud den changes in performance as a function of the number of examples. The argu ments of Clarke and Barron cannot encompass these phase transitions or “aha !” phenomena. While much of learning theory has properly focused on proble ms with finite VC dimension, it might be that the conventional scenario in w hich the num- ber of examples eventually overwhelms the number of paramet ers or dimensions is too weak to deal with many real world problems. Certainly i n the present context there is not only a quantitative, but also a qualitat ive difference be- tween reaching the asymptotic regime in just a few measureme nts, or in many millions of them. Finitely parameterizable models with fini te or infinite dVC fall in essentially different universality classes with respect to the predictive information. 3.5 Beyond finite parameterization: general considerations The previous sections have considered learning from time se ries where the un- derlying class of possible models is described with a finite n umber of parameters. If the number of parameters is not finite then in principle it i s impossible to learn anything unless there is some appropriate regulariza tion of the problem. If we let the number of parameters stay finite but become large , then there ismore to be learned and correspondingly the predictive informati on grows in proportion to this number, as in Eq. (58). On the other hand, i f the number of parameters becomes infinite without regularization, then t he predictive infor- mation should go to zero since nothing can be learned. We shou ld be able to see 7Interestingly, since for the model Eq. (72) KL divergence is bounded from below and above, forαmax→ ∞ the weight in ρ(D;¯α) at small DKLvanishes, and a finite weight accumulates at some nonzero value of D. Thus, even putting the fluctuations aside, the asymptotic b ehavior based on the phase space dimension is invalidated, as mentio ned above. 24this happen in a regularized problem if the regularization b ecomes weaker and weaker: eventually the regularization would be insufficient and the predictive information would vanish. The only way this can happen is if t he subextensive term in the entropy grows more and more rapidly with Nas we weaken the regularization, until finally it becomes extensive at the po int where learning be- comes impossible. More precisely, if this scenario for the b reakdown of learning is to work, there must be situations in which the predictive i nformation grows withNmore rapidly than the logarithmic behavior found in the case of finite parameterization. Subextensive terms in the entropy are controlled by the dens ity of models as function of their Kullback–Leibler divergence to the tar get model. If the models have finite VC and phase space dimensions then this den sity vanishes for small divergences as ρ∼D(d−2)/2. Phenomenologically, if we let the number of parameters increase, the density vanishes more and more r apidly. We can imagine that beyond the class of finitely parameterizable pr oblems there is a class of regularized infinite dimensional problems in which the density ρ(D→0) vanishes more rapidly than any power of D. As an example, we could have ρ(D→0)≈Aexp/bracketleftbigg −B Dµ/bracketrightbigg , µ> 0, (73) that is an essential singularity at D= 0. For simplicity we assume that the constantsAandBcan depend on the target model, but that the nature of the essential singularity ( µ) is the same everywhere. Before providing an explicit example, let us explore the consequences of this behavior. From Eq. (50) above, we can write the partition function as Z(¯α;N) =/integraldisplay dDρ(D;¯α)exp[−ND] ≈A(¯α)/integraldisplay dDexp/bracketleftbigg −B(¯α) Dµ−ND/bracketrightbigg ≈˜A(¯α)exp/bracketleftbigg −1 2µ+ 2 µ+ 1lnN−C(¯α)Nµ/(µ+1)/bracketrightbigg , (74) where in the last step we use a saddle point or steepest descen t approximation which is accurate at large N, and the coefficients are ˜A(¯α) =A(¯α)/parenleftbigg2πµ1/(µ+1) µ+ 1/parenrightbigg1/2 ·[B(¯α)]1/(2µ+2) C(¯α) = [B(¯α)]1/(µ+1)/parenleftbigg1 µµ/(µ+1)+µ1/(µ+1)/parenrightbigg Finally we can use Eqs. (57, 74) to compute the subextensive t erm in the entropy, keeping only the dominant term at large N, S(a) 1(N)→1 ln 2∝an}bracketle{tC(¯α)∝an}bracketri}ht¯αNµ/(µ+1)(bits), (75) where ∝an}bracketle{t···∝an}bracketri}ht ¯αdenotes an average over all the target models. 25This behavior of the first subextensive term is qualitativel y different from everything we have observed so far. A power law divergence is much stronger than a logarithmic one. Therefore, a lot more predictive inf ormation is accumu- lated in an “infinite parameter” (or nonparametric) system; the system is much richer and more complex, both intuitively and quantitative ly. Subextensive entropy also grows as a power law in a finitely pa rameterizable system with a growing number of parameters. For example, sup pose that we approximate the distribution of a random variable by a histo gram withKbins, and we letKgrow with the quantity of available samples as K∼Nν. Equation (58) suggests that in a K–parameter system, the Nthsample point contributes ∼K/2Nbits to the subextensive entropy. If Kchanges as mentioned, the Nth example then carries ∼Nν−1bits. Summing this up for all the samples from the first to the last one, we find S(a) 1∼Nν, and if we let ν=µ/(µ+ 1) we obtain Eq. (75). Note that the growth of the number of paramet ers is slower thanN(ν=µ/(µ+ 1)<1), which makes sense. Power law growth of the predictive information illustrates the point made earlier about the transition from learning more to finally le arning nothing as the class of investigated models becomes more complex. As µincreases the problem becomes richer and more complex, and this is express ed in the stronger divergence of the first subextensive term of the entropy; for fixed large N, the predictive information increases with µ. However, if µ→ ∞ the problem is too complex for learning—in our model example the number of bins is growing in proportion to the number of samples, which means that we are t rying to find too much detail in the underlying distribution. As a result, the subextensive term becomes extensive and stops contributing to predictiv e information. Thus, at least to the leading order, predictability is lost, as pro mised. 3.6 Beyond finite parameterization: example The discussion in the previous section suggests that we shou ld look for power– law behavior of the predictive information in learning prob lems where rather than learning ever more precise values for a fixed set of param eters, we learn a progressively more detailed description—effectively inc reasing the number of parameters—as we collect more data. One example of such a pro blem is learning the distribution Q(x) for a continuous variable x, but rather than writing a parametric form of Q(x) we assume only that this function itself is chosen from some distribution that enforces a degree of smoothness. The re are some natural connections of this problem to the methods of quantum field th eory (Bialek, Callan, and Strong 1996) which we can exploit to give a comple te calculation of the predictive information, at least for a class of smooth ness constraints. We writeQ(x) = (1/l0)exp[−φ(x)] so that positivity of the distribution is automatic, and then smoothness may be expressed by saying th at the “energy” (or action) associated with a function φ(x) is related to an integral over its derivatives, like the strain energy in a stretched string. T he simplest possibility 26along this line of ideas is that the distribution of function s is given by P[φ(x)] =1 Zexp/bracketleftBigg −l 2/integraldisplay dx/parenleftbigg∂φ ∂x/parenrightbigg2/bracketrightBigg δ/bracketleftbigg1 l0/integraldisplay dxe−φ(x)−1/bracketrightbigg , (76) where Zis the normalization constant for P[φ], the delta function insures that each distribution Q(x) is normalized, and lsets a scale for smoothness. If distri- butions are chosen from this distribution, then the optimal Bayesian estimate of Q(x) from a set of samples x1,x2,···,xNconverges to the correct answer, and the distribution at finite Nis nonsingular, so that the regularization provided by this prior is strong enough to prevent the development of s ingular peaks at the location of observed data points (Bialek, Callan, and St rong 1996). Fur- ther developments of the theory, including alternative cho ices ofP[φ(x)], have been given by Periwal (1997, 1998), Holy (1997) and Aida (199 8); for a detailed numerical investigation of this problem see Nemenman and Bi alek (2000). Our goal here is to be illustrative rather than exhaustive.8 From the discussion above we know that the predictive inform ation is related to the density of Kullback–Leibler divergences, and that th e power–law behavior we are looking for comes from an essential singularity in thi s density function. WithQ(x) = (1/l0)exp[−φ(x)], we can write the KL divergence as DKL[¯φ(x)||φ(x)] =1 l0/integraldisplay dxexp[−¯φ(x)][φ(x)−¯φ(x)]. (77) We want to compute the density, ρ(D;¯φ) =/integraldisplay [dφ(x)]P[φ(x)]δ/parenleftbig D−DKL[¯φ(x)||φ(x)]/parenrightbig (78) =M/integraldisplay [dφ(x)]P[φ(x)]δ/parenleftbig MD−MDKL[¯φ(x)||φ(x)]/parenrightbig , (79) where we introduce a factor Mwhich we will allow to become large so that we can focus our attention on the interesting limit D→0. To compute this integral over all functions φ(x), we introduce a Fourier representation for the delta function, and then rearrange the terms: ρ(D;¯φ) =M/integraldisplaydz 2πexp(izMD )/integraldisplay [dφ(x)]P[φ(x)] exp( −izMD KL) (80) =M/integraldisplaydz 2πexp/parenleftbigg izMD +izM l0/integraldisplay dx¯φ(x)exp[−¯φ(x)]/parenrightbigg ×/integraldisplay [dφ(x)]P[φ(x)] exp/parenleftbigg −izM l0/integraldisplay dxφ(x)exp[−¯φ(x)]/parenrightbigg .(81) The inner integral over the functions φ(x) is exactly the integral which was evaluated in the original discussion of this problem (Biale k, Callan and Strong 8We caution the reader that our discussion in this section is l ess self–contained than in other sections. Since the crucial steps exactly parallel th ose in the earlier work, here we just give references. 271996); in the limit that zMis large we can use a saddle point approximation, and standard field theoretic methods allow us to compute the fluct uations around the saddle point. The result is that /integraldisplay [dφ(x)]P[φ(x)] exp/parenleftbigg −izM l0/integraldisplay dxφ(x)exp[−¯φ(x)]/parenrightbigg = exp/parenleftbigg −izM l0/integraldisplay dx¯φ(x)exp[−¯φ(x)]−Seff[¯φ(x);zM]/parenrightbigg , (82) Seff[¯φ;zM] =l 2/integraldisplay dx/parenleftbigg∂¯φ ∂x/parenrightbigg2 +1 2/parenleftbiggizM ll0/parenrightbigg1/2/integraldisplay dxexp[−¯φ(x)/2]. (83) Now we can do the integral over z, again by a saddle point method. The two saddle point approximations are both valid in the limit t hatD→0 and MD3/2→ ∞; we are interested precisely in the first limit, and we are fre e to setMas we wish, so this gives us a good approximation for ρ(D→0;¯φ). The result is that ρ(D→0;¯φ) =A[¯φ(x)]D−3/2exp/parenleftbigg −B[¯φ(x)] D/parenrightbigg , (84) A[¯φ(x)] =1√16πll0exp/bracketleftbigg −l 2/integraldisplay dx/parenleftbig ∂x¯φ/parenrightbig2/bracketrightbigg/integraldisplay dxexp[−¯φ(x)/2](85) B[¯φ(x)] =1 16ll0/parenleftbigg/integraldisplay dxexp[−¯φ(x)/2]/parenrightbigg2 . (86) Except for the factor of D−3/2, this is exactly the sort of essential singularity that we considered in the previous section, with µ= 1. TheD−3/2prefactor does not change the leading large Nbehavior of the predictive information, and we find that S(a) 1(N)∼1 2 ln2√ll0/angbracketleftBigg/integraldisplay dxexp[−¯φ(x)/2]/angbracketrightBigg ¯φN1/2, (87) where ∝an}bracketle{t···∝an}bracketri}ht ¯φdenotes an average over the target distributions ¯φ(x) weighted once again byP[¯φ(x)]. Notice that if xis unbounded then the average in Eq. (87) is infrared divergent; if instead we let the variable xrange from 0 to Lthen this average should be dominated by the uniform distributio n. Replacing the average by its value at this point, we obtain the approximate result S(a) 1(N)∼1 2 ln2√ N/parenleftbiggL l/parenrightbigg1/2 bits. (88) To understand the result in Eq. (88), we recall that this field theoretic approach is more or less equivalent to an adaptive binning pr ocedure in which 28we divide the range of xinto bins of local size/radicalbig l/NQ(x) (Bialek, Callan, and Strong 1996). From this point of view, Eq. (88) makes perfect sense: the predictive information is directly proportional to the num ber of bins that can be put in the range of x. This also is in direct accord with a comment from the previous subsection that power law behavior of predictive i nformation arises from the number of parameters in the problem depending on the number of samples. This counting of parameters allows a schematic argument abo ut the small- ness of fluctuations in this particular nonparametric probl em. If we take the hint that at every step ∼√ Nbins are being investigated, then we can imagine that the field theoretic prior in Eq. (76) has imposed a struct ureCon the set of all possible densities, so that the set Cnis formed of all continuous piecewise linear functions that have not more than n kinks. Learning su ch functions for finite n is a dVC= n problem. Now, as Ngrows, the elements with higher capacities n ∼√ Nare admitted. The fluctuations in such a problem are known to be controllable (Vapnik 1998), as will be discussed in mor e detail elsewhere (Nemenman 2000). One thing which remains troubling is that the predictive inf ormation de- pends on the arbitrary parameter ldescribing the scale of smoothness in the distribution. In the original work it was proposed that one s hould integrate over possible values of l(Bialek, Callan and Strong 1996). Numerical simu- lations demonstrate that this parameter can be learned from the data itself (Nemenman and Bialek 2000), but perhaps even more interesti ng is a formula- tion of the problem by Periwal (1997, 1998) which recovers co mplete coordinate invariance by allowing (effectively) lto vary with x. In this case the whole theory has no length scale, and there also is no need to confine the variable xto a box (here of size L). We expect that this coordinate invariant approach will lead to a universal coefficient multiplying√ Nin the analog of Eq. (88), but this remains to be shown. In summary, the field theoretic approach to learning a smooth distribution in one dimension provides us with a concrete, calculable exa mple of a learn- ing problem with power–law growth of the predictive informa tion. The sce- nario is exactly as suggested in the previous section, where the density of KL divergences develops an essential singularity. Heuristic considerations (Bialek, Callan, and Strong 1996; Aida 1999) suggest that different sm oothness penalties and generalizations to higher dimensional problems will ha ve sensible effects on the predictive information—all have power–law growth, but smoother functions have smaller powers (less to learn) and higher dimensional p roblems have larger powers (more to learn)—but real calculations for these case s remain challenging. 4Ipredas a measure of complexity The problem of quantifying complexity is very old. Solomono ff (1964), Kol- mogorov (1965), and Chaitin (1975) investigated a mathemat ically rigorous no- tion of complexity that measures (roughly) the minimum leng th of a computer 29program that simulates the observed time series [see also Li and Vit´ anyi (1993)]. Unfortunately there is no algorithm that can calculate the K olmogorov complex- ity of a particular data set. In addition, algorithmic or Kol mogorov complexity is closely related to the Shannon entropy, which means that i t measures some- thing closer to our intuitive concept of randomness than to t he intuitive concept of complexity [as discussed, for example, by Bennett (1990) ]. These problems have fueled continued research along two different paths, re presenting two major motivations for defining complexity. First, one would like t o make precise an impression that some systems—such as life on earth or a turbu lent fluid flow— evolve toward a state of higher complexity, and one would lik e to be able to classify those states. Second, in choosing among different m odels that describe an experiment, one wants to quantify a preference for simple r explanations or, equivalently, provide a penalty for complex models that can be weighed against the more conventional goodness of fit criteria. We bring our r eaders up to date with some developments in both of these directions, and then discuss the role of predictive information as a measure of complexity. This a lso gives us an opportunity to discuss more carefully the relation of our re sults to previous work. 4.1 Complexity of statistical models The construction of complexity penalties for model selecti on is a statistics prob- lem. As far as we know, however, the first discussions of compl exity in this context belong to philosophical literature. Even leaving a side the early contri- butions of William of Ockham on the need for simplicity, Hume on the problem of induction, and Popper on falsifiability, Kemeney (1953) s uggested explicitly that it would be possible to create a model selection criteri on that balances goodness of fit versus complexity. Wallace and Burton (1968) hinted that this balance may result in the model with “the briefest recording of all attribute information.” Even though he probably had a somewhat differe nt motivation, Akaike (1974a, 1974b) made the first quantitative step along these lines. His ad hoc complexity term was independent of the number of data points and was proportional to the number of free independent parameters i n the model. These ideas were rediscovered and developed systematicall y by Rissanen in a series of papers starting from 1978. He has emphasized stron gly (Rissanen 1984, 1986, 1987) that fitting a model to data represents an encodin g of those data, or predicting future data, and that in searching for an efficie nt code we need to measure not only the number of bits required to describe the d eviations of the data from the model’s predictions (goodness of fit), but also the number of bits required to specify the parameters of the model (complexity ). This specifica- tion has to be done to a precision supported by the data.9Rissanen (1984) and Clarke and Barron (1990) in full generality were able to prov e that the optimal encoding of a model requires a code with length asymptotical ly proportional to 9Within this framework Akaike’s suggestion can be seen as cod ing the model to (subopti- mal) fixed precision. 30the number of independent parameters and logarithmically d ependent on the number of data points we have observed. The minimal amount of space one needs to encode a data string (minimum description length or MDL) within a certain assumed model class was termed by Rissanen stochastic complexity, and in recent work he refers to the piece of the stochastic com plexity required for coding the parameters as the model complexity (Rissanen 1996). This ap- proach was further strengthened by a recent result (Vit´ any i and Li 2000) that an estimation of parameters using the MDL principle is equiv alent to Bayesian parameter estimations with a “universal” prior (Li and Vit´ anyi 1993). There should be a close connection between Rissanen’s ideas of encoding the data stream and the subextensive entropy. We are accusto med to the idea that the average length of a code word for symbols drawn from a distribution Pis given by the entropy of that distribution; thus it is tempt ing to say that an encoding of a stream x1,x2,···,xNwill require an amount of space equal to the entropy of the joint distribution P(x1,x2,···,xN). The situation here is a bit more subtle, because the usual proofs of equivalence be tween code length and entropy rely on notions of typicality and asymptotics as we try to encode sequences of many symbols; here we already have Nsymbols and so it doesn’t really make sense to talk about a stream of streams. One can ar gue, however, that atypical sequences are not truly random within a consid ered distribution since their coding by the methods optimized for the distribu tion is not opti- mal. So atypical sequences are better considered as typical ones coming from a different distribution [a point also made by Grassberger (1 986)]. This allows us to identify properties of an observed (long) string with t he properties of the distribution it comes from, as was done by Vit´ anyi and Li (20 00). If we ac- cept this identification of entropy with code length, then Ri ssanen’s stochastic complexity should be the entropy of the distribution P(x1,x2,···,xN). As emphasized by Balasubramanian (1996), the entropy of the joint distri- bution ofNpoints can be decomposed into pieces that represent noise or errors in the model’s local predictions—an extensive entropy—and the space required to encode the model itself, which must be the subextensive en tropy. Since in the usual formulation all long–term predictions are associate d with the continued validity of the model parameters, the dominant component of the subextensive entropy must be this parameter coding, or model complexity i n Rissanen’s ter- minology. Thus the subextensive entropy should be the model complexity, and in simple cases where we can describe the data by a K–parameter model both quantities are equal to ( K/2)log2Nbits to the leading order. The fact that the subextensive entropy or predictive inform ation agrees with Rissanen’s model complexity suggests that Ipredprovides a reasonable measure of complexity in learning problems. On the other hand, this a greement might lead the reader to wonder if all we have done is to rewrite the r esults of Rissa- nen et al. in a different notation. To calm these fears we recal l again that our approach distinguishes infinite VC problems from finite ones and treats non- parametric cases as well. Indeed, the predictive informati on is defined without reference to the idea that we are learning a model, and thus we can make a link to physical aspects of the problem. 314.2 Complexity of dynamical systems There is a strong prejudice that the complexity of physical s ystems should be measured by quantities that are at least related to more conv entional thermody- namic quantities (temperature, entropy, ...), since this is the only way one will be able to calculate complexity within the framework of stat istical mechanics. Most proposals define complexity as an entropy–like quantit y, but an entropy of some unusual ensemble. For example, Lloyd and Pagels (198 8) identified complexity as thermodynamic depth , the entropy of the state sequences that lead to the current state. The idea is clearly in the same spir it as the mea- surement of predictive information, but this depth measure does not completely discard the extensive component of the entropy (Crutchfield and Shalizi 1999) and thus fails to resolve the essential difficulty in construc ting complexity mea- sures for physical systems: distinguishing genuine comple xity from randomness (entropy), the complexity should be zero both for purely reg ular and for purely random systems. New definitions of complexity that try to satisfy these crite ria (Lopez–Ruiz et al. 1995, Gell–Mann and Lloyd 1996, Shiner et al. 1999, Sol e and Luque 1999, Adami and Cerf 2000) and criticisms of these proposals (Crut chfield et al. 1999, Feldman and Crutchfield 1998, Sole and Luque 1999) continue t o emerge even now. Aside from the obvious problems of not actually elimina ting the extensive component for all or a part of the parameter space or not expre ssing complexity as an average over a physical ensemble, the critiques often a re based on a clever argument first mentioned explicitly by Feldman and Crutchfie ld (1998). In an attempt to create a universal measure, the constructions ca n be made over- universal : many proposed complexity measures depend only on the entro py density S0and thus are functions only of disorder—not a desired featur e. In addition, many of these and other definitions are flawed becau se they fail to distinguish among the richness of classes beyond some very s imple ones. In a series of papers, Crutchfield and coworkers identified statistical com- plexity with the entropy of causal states, which in turn are defined as all those microstates (or histories) that have the same conditional d istribution of futures (Crutchfield and Young 1989, Shalizi and Crutchfield 1999). T he causal states provide an optimal description of a system’s dynamics in the sense that these states make as good a prediction as the histories themselves . Statistical com- plexity is very similar to predictive information, but Shal izi and Crutchfield (1999) define a quantity which is even closer to the spirit of o ur discussion: theirexcess entropy is exactly the mutual information between the semi–infinite past and future. Unfortunately, by focusing on cases in whic h the past and future are infinite but the excess entropy is finite, their dis cussion is limited to systems for which (in our language) Ipred(T→ ∞) = constant. In our view, Grassberger (1986) has made the clearest and the most appeal- ing definitions. He emphasized that the slow approach of the e ntropy to its extensive limit is a sign of complexity, and has proposed sev eral functions to analyze this slow approach. His effective measure complexity is the subexten- sive entropy term of an infinite data sample. Unlike Crutchfie ld et al., he allows 32this measure to grow to infinity. As an example, for low dimens ional dynamical systems, the effective measure complexity is finite whether t he system exhibits periodic or chaotic behavior, but at the bifurcation point t hat marks the onset of chaos, it diverges logarithmically. More interestingly , Grassberger also notes that simulations of specific cellular automaton models that are capable of uni- versal computation indicate that these systems can exhibit an even stronger, power–law, divergence. Grassberger (1986) also introduces the true measure complexity , which is the minimal information one needs to extract from the past in order to pro- vide optimal prediction. This quantity is exactly the stati stical complexity of Crutchfield et al., and the two approaches are actually much c loser than they seem. The relation between the true and the effective measure complexities, or between the statistical complexity and the excess entrop y, closely parallels the idea of extracting or compressing relevant information (Tishby et al. 1999, Bialek and Tishby, in preparation), as discussed below. 4.3 A unique measure of complexity? We recall that entropy provides a measure of information tha t is unique in satis- fying certain plausible constraints (Shannon 1948). It wou ld be attractive if we could prove a similar uniqueness theorem for the predictive information, or any part of it, as a measure of the complexity or richness of a time dependent signal x(0< t < T ) drawn from a distribution P[x(t)]. Before proceeding with such an argument we have to ask, however, whether we want to attach measures of complexity to a particular signal x(t), or whether we are interested in measures (like the entropy itself) which constitute an average over t he ensemble P[x(t)]. In most cases, including the learning problems discussed ab ove, it is clear that we want to measure complexity of the dynamics underlyin g the signal, or equivalently the complexity of a model that might be used to d escribe the signal. This is very different from trying to define the complexity of a single realization, because there can be atypical data streams. Either we must tr eat atypicality explicitly, arguing that atypical data streams from one sou rce should be viewed as typical streams from another source, as discussed by Vit´ anyi and Li (2000), or we have to look at average quantities. Grassberger (1986) in particular has argued that our visual intuition about the complexity of spa tial patterns is an ensemble concept, even if the ensemble is only implicit [s ee also Tong in the discussion session of Rissanen (1987)]. So we shall sear ch for measures of complexity that are averages over the distribution P[x(t)]. Once we focus on average quantities, we can start by adopting Shannon’s postulates as constraints on a measure of complexity: if the re areNequally likely signals, then the measure should be monotonic in N; if the signal is decomposable into statistically independent parts then th e measure should be additive with respect to this decomposition; and if the sign al can be described as a leaf on a tree of statistically independent decisions th en the measure should be a weighted sum of the measures at each branching point. We b elieve that these constraints are as plausible for complexity measures as for information 33measures, and it is well known from Shannon’s original work t hat this set of constraints leaves the entropy as the only possibility. Sin ce we are discussing a time dependent signal, this entropy depends on the duratio n of our sample, S(T). We know of course that this cannot be the end of the discussi on, because we need to distinguish between randomness (entropy) and com plexity. The path to this distinction is to introduce other constraints on our measure. First we notice that if the signal xis continuous, then the entropy is not in- variant under transformations of x. It seems reasonable to ask that complexity be a function of the process we are observing and not of the coo rdinate system in which we choose to record our observations. The examples a bove show us, however, that it is not the whole function S(T) which depends on the coordinate system forx;10it is only the extensive component of the entropy that has thi s noninvariance. This can be seen more generally by noting tha t subextensive terms in the entropy contribute to the mutual information am ong different seg- ments of the data stream (including the predictive informat ion defined here), while the extensive entropy cannot; mutual information is c oordinate invariant, so all of the noninvariance must reside in the extensive term . Thus, any measure complexity that is coordinate invariant must discard the ex tensive component of the entropy. The fact that extensive entropy cannot contribute to comple xity is discussed widely in the physics literature (Bennett 1990), as our shor t review above shows. To statisticians and computer scientists, who are used to Ko lmogorov’s ideas, this is less obvious. However, Rissanen (1986, 1987) also ta lks about “noise” and “useful information” in a data sequence, which is similar to splitting entropy into its extensive and the subextensive parts. His “model comple xity,” aside from not being an average as required above, is essentially equal to the subextensive entropy. Similarly, Whittle [in the discussion of Rissanen (1987)] talks about separating the predictive part of the data from the rest. If we continue along these lines, we can think about the asymp totic expansion of the entropy at large T. The extensive term is the first term in this series, and we have seen that it must be discarded. What about the othe r terms? In the context of learning a parameterized model, most of the te rms in this series depend in detail on our prior distribution in parameter spac e, which might seem odd for a measure of complexity. More generally, if we consid er transformations of the data stream x(t) that mix points within a temporal window of size τ, then forT >>τ the entropy S(T) may have subextensive terms which are constant, and these are not invariant under this class of transformati ons. On the other hand, if there are divergent subextensive terms, these areinvariant under such temporally local transformations.11So if we insist that measures of complexity be invariant not only under instantaneous coordinate trans formations, but also under temporally local transformations, then we can discar d both the extensive 10Here we consider instantaneous transformations of x, not filtering or other transformations that mix points at different times. 11Throughout this discussion we assume that the signal xat one point in time is finite dimensional. There are subtleties if we allow xto represent the configuration of a spatially infinite system. 34and the finite subextensive terms in the entropy, leaving onl y the divergent subextensive terms as a possible measure of complexity. An interesting example of these arguments is provided by the statistical mechanics of polymers. It is conventional to make models of p olymers as random walks on a lattice, with various interactions or self avoida nce constraints among different elements of the polymer chain. If we count the numbe rNof walks with Nsteps, we find that N(N)∼ANγzN(de Gennes 1979). Now the entropy is the logarithm of the number of states, and so there is an exten sive entropy S0= log2z, a constant subextensive entropy log2A, and a divergent subextensive termS1(N)→γlog2N. Of these three terms, only the divergent subextensive term (related to the critical exponent γ) is universal, that is independent of the detailed structure of the lattice. Thus, as in our general ar gument, it is only the divergent subextensive terms in the entropy that are inv ariant to changes in our description of the local, small scale dynamics. We can recast the invariance arguments in a slightly differen t form using the relative entropy. We recall that entropy is defined clean ly only for discrete processes, and that in the continuum there are ambiguities. We would like to write the continuum generalization of the entropy of a proce ssx(t) distributed according to P[x(t)] as Scont=−/integraldisplay Dx(t)P[x(t)] log2P[x(t)], (89) but this is not well defined because we are taking the logarith m of a dimensionful quantity. Shannon gave the solution to this problem: we use a s a measure of information the relative entropy or KL divergence betwee n the distribution P[x(t)] and some reference distribution Q[x(t)], Srel=−/integraldisplay Dx(t)P[x(t)] log2/parenleftbiggP[x(t)] Q[x(t)]/parenrightbigg , (90) which is invariant under changes of our coordinate system on the space of signals. The cost of this invariance is that we have introduced an arbi trary distribution Q[x(t)], and so really we have a family of measures. We can find a uniq ue com- plexity measure within this family by imposing invariance p rinciples as above, but in this language we must make our measure invariant to diff erent choices of the reference distribution Q[x(t)]. The reference distribution Q[x(t)] embodies our expectations for the signal x(t); in particular, Srelmeasures the extra space needed to encode signals drawn from the distribution P[x(t)] if we use coding strategies that are optimized for Q[x(t)]. Ifx(t) is a written text, two readers who expect different numbers o f spelling errors will have different Qs, but to the extent that spelling errors can be corrected by reference to the immediate neighboring lett ers we insist that any measure of complexity be invariant to these differences i nQ. On the other hand, readers who differ in their expectations about the glob al subject of the text may well disagree about the richness of a newspaper arti cle. This suggests that complexity is a component of the relative entropy that i s invariant under some class of local translations and misspellings. 35Suppose that we leave aside global expectations, and constr uct our reference distribution Q[x(t)] by allowing only for short ranged interactions—certain l et- ters tend to follow one another, letters form words, and so on , but we bound the range over which these rules are applied. Models of this clas s cannot embody the full structure of most interesting time series (includi ng language), but in the present context we are not asking for this. On the contrar y, we are looking for a measure that is invariant to differences in this short ra nged structure. In the terminology of field theory or statistical mechanics, we are constructing our reference distribution Q[x(t)] from local operators. Because we are considering a one dimensional signal (the one dimension being time), dis tributions con- structed from local operators cannot have any phase transit ions as a function of parameters; again it is important that the signal xat one point in time is finite dimensional. The absence of critical points means that the e ntropy of these dis- tributions (or their contribution to the relative entropy) consists of an extensive term (proportional to the time window T) plus a constant subextensive term, plus terms that vanish as Tbecomes large. Thus, if we choose different reference distributions within the class constructible from local op erators, we can change the extensive component of the relative entropy, and we can c hange constant subextensive terms, but the divergent subextensive terms a re invariant. To summarize, the usual constraints on information measure s in the contin- uum produce a family of allowable complexity measures, the r elative entropy to an arbitrary reference distribution. If we insist that all o bservers who choose reference distributions constructed from local operators arrive at the same mea- sure of complexity, or if we follow the first line of arguments presented above, then this measure must be the divergent subextensive compon ent of the entropy or, equivalently, the predictive information. We have seen that this component is connected to learning, quantifying the amount that can be learned about dy- namics that generate the signal, and to measures of complexi ty that have arisen in statistics and in dynamical systems theory. 5 Discussion We have presented predictive information as a characterization of data streams. In the context of learning, predictive information is relat ed directly to general- ization. More generally, the structure or order in a time ser ies or a sequence is related almost by definition to the fact that there is predi ctability along the sequence. The predictive information measures the amount o f such structure, but doesn’t exhibit the structure in a concrete form. Having collected a data stream of duration T, what are the features of these data that carry the predic- tive information Ipred(T)? From Eq. (7) we know that most of what we have seen over the time Tmust be irrelevant to the problem of prediction, so that the predictive information is a small fraction of the total i nformation; can we separate these predictive bits from the vast amount of nonpr edictive data? The problem of separating predictive from nonpredictive in formation is a special case of the problem discussed recently (Tishby et al . 1999, Bialek and 36Tishby, in preparation): given some data x, how do we compress our description ofxwhile preserving as much information as possible about some other variable y? Here we identify x=xpastas the past data and y=xfuture as the future. When we compress xpastinto some reduced description ˆ xpastwe keep a certain amount of information about the past, I(ˆxpast;xpast), and we also preserve a certain amount of information about the future, I(ˆxpast;xfuture). There is no single correct compression xpast→ˆxpast; instead there is a one parameter family of strategies which trace out an optimal curve in the plane de fined by these two mutual informations, I(ˆxpast;xfuture) vs.I(ˆxpast;xpast). The predictive information preserved by compression must b e less than the total, so that I(ˆxpast;xfuture)≤Ipred(T). Generically no compression can pre- serve all of the predictive information so that the inequali ty will be strict, but there are interesting special cases where equality can be ac hieved. If prediction proceeds by learning a model with a finite number of parameter s, we might have a regression formula that specifies the best estimate of the p arameters given the past data; using the regression formula compresses the data but preserves all of the predictive power. In cases like this (more generally, if there exist sufficient statistics for the prediction problem) we can ask for the min imal set of ˆxpastsuch thatI(ˆxpast;xfuture) =Ipred(T). The entropy of this minimal ˆ xpastis the true measure complexity defined by Grassberger (1986) or the stat istical complexity defined by Crutchfield and Young (1989). In the context of statistical mechanics, long range correla tions are char- acterized by computing the correlation functions of order p arameters, which are coarse–grained functions of the system’s microscopic v ariables. If we know something about the nature of the order parameter (e.g., whe ther it is a vec- tor or a scalar), then general principles allow a fairly comp lete classification and description of long range ordering and the nature of the c ritical points at which this order can appear or change. On the other hand, defin ing the order parameter itself remains something of an art. For a ferromag net, the order pa- rameter is obtained by local averaging of the microscopic sp ins, while for an antiferromagnet one must average the staggered magnetizat ion to capture the fact that the ordering involves an alternation from site to s ite, and so on. Since the order parameter carries all the information that contri butes to long range correlations in space and time, it might be possible to define order parameters more generally as those variables that provide the most effici ent compression of the predictive information, and this should be especially i nteresting for complex or disordered systems where the nature of the order is not obv ious intuitively; a first try in this direction was made by Bruder (1998). At criti cal points the pre- dictive information will diverge, and the coefficients of the se divergences should be related to the standard scaling dimensions of the order pa rameters, but the details of this connection need to be worked out. If we compress or extract the predictive information from a t ime series we are in effect discovering “features” that capture the nature of the ordering in time. Learning itself can be seen as an example of this, where we discover the parameters of an underlying model by trying to compress the i nformation that one sample of Npoints provides about the next, and in this way we address 37directly the problem of generalization (Bialek and Tishby, in preparation). The fact that (as mentioned above) nonpredictive information i s useless to the or- ganism suggests that one crucial goal of neural information processing is to separate predictive information from the background. Perh aps rather than pro- viding an efficient representation of the current state of the world—as suggested by Attneave (1954), Barlow (1959, 1961), and others (Atick 1 992)—the nervous system provides an efficient representation of the predictiv e information.12It should be possible to test this directly by studying the enco ding of reasonably natural signals and asking if the information which neural r esponses provide about the future of the input is close to the limit set by the st atistics of the input itself, given that the neuron only captures a certain n umber of bits about the past. Thus we might ask if, under natural stimulus condit ions, a motion sensitive visual neuron captures features of the motion tra jectory that allow for optimal prediction or extrapolation of that trajectory ; by using informa- tion theoretic measures we both test the “efficient represent ation” hypothesis directly and avoid arbitrary assumptions about the metric f or errors in predic- tion. For more complex signals such as communication sounds , even identifying the features that capture the predictive information is an i nteresting problem. It is natural to ask if these ideas about predictive informat ion could be used to analyze experiments on learning in animals or humans. We h ave emphasized the problem of learning probability distributions or proba bilistic models rather than learning deterministic functions, associations or ru les. It is known that the nervous system adapts to the statistics of its inputs, an d this adaptation is evident in the responses of single neurons (Smirnakis et al. 1996, Brenner et al. 2000); these experiments provide a simple example of the system learning a parameterized distribution. When making saccadic eye mov ements, human subjects alter their distribution of reaction times in rela tion to the relative prob- abilities of different targets, as if they had learned an esti mate of the relevant likelihood ratios (Carpenter and Williams 1995). Humans al so can learn to discriminate almost optimally between random sequences (f air coin tosses) and sequences that are correlated or anticorrelated according to a Markov process; this learning can be accomplished from examples alone, with no other feedback 12If, as seems likely, the stream of data reaching our senses ha s diverging predictive infor- mation then the space required to write down our description grows and grows as we observe the world for longer periods of time. In particular, if we can observe for a very long time then the amount that we know about the future will exceed, by a n arbitrarily large factor, the amount that we know about the present. Thus representing the predictive information may require many more neurons than would be required to repre sent the current data. If we imagine that the goal of primary sensory cortex is to represe nt the current state of the sensory world, then it is difficult to understand why these cortices ha ve so many more neurons than they have sensory inputs. In the extreme case, the region of p rimary visual cortex devoted to inputs from the fovea has nearly 30,000 neurons for each ph otoreceptor cell in the retina (Hawken and Parker 1991); although much remains to be learne d about these cells, it is dif- ficult to imagine that the activity of so many neurons constit utes an efficient representation of the current sensory inputs. But if we live in a world where t he predictive information in the movies reaching our retina diverges, it is perfectly pos sible that an efficient representation of the predictive information available to us at one instant requires thousands of times more space than an efficient representation of the image currently falling on our retina. 38(Lopes and Oden 1987). Acquisition of language may require l earning the joint distribution of successive phonemes, syllables, or words, and there is direct ev- idence for learning of conditional probabilities from arti ficial sound sequences, both by infants and by adults (Saffran et al. 1996; 1999). Thes e examples, which are not exhaustive, indicate that the nervous system can lea rn an appropriate probabilistic model,13and this offers the opportunity to analyze the dynamics of this learning using information theoretic methods: What is the entropy of N successive reaction times following a switch to a new set of r elative probabilities in the saccade experiment? How much information does a singl e reaction time provide about the relevant probabilities? Following the ar guments above, such analysis could lead to a measurement of the universal learni ng curve Λ( N). The learning curve Λ( N) exhibited by a human observer is limited by the predictive information in the time series of stimulus trial s itself. Comparing Λ(N) to this limit defines an efficiency of learning in the spirit of the discussion by Barlow (1983); while it is known that the nervous system ca n make efficient use of available information in signal processing tasks [cf . Chapter 4 of Rieke et al. (1997)], it is not known whether the brain is an efficient le arning machine in the analogous sense. Given our classification of learning ta sks by their complex- ity, it would be natural to ask if the efficiency of learning wer e a critical function of task complexity: perhaps we can even identify a limit beyo nd which efficient learning fails, indicating a limit to the complexity of the i nternal model used by the brain during a class of learning tasks. We believe that our theoretical discussion here at least frames a clear question about the co mplexity of internal models, even if for the present we can only speculate about th e outcome of such experiments. An important result of our analysis is the characterization of time series or learning problems beyond the class of finitely parameteriza ble models, that is the class with power–law divergent predictive information. Qu alitatively this class is more complex than anyparametric model, no matter how many parameters there may be, because of the more rapid asymptotic growth of Ipred(N). On the other hand, with a finite number of observations N, the actual amount of predictive information in such a nonparametric problem may besmaller than in a model with a large but finite number of parameters. Specifi cally, if we have two models, one with Ipred(N)∼ANνand one with Kparameters so thatIpred(N)∼(K/2)log2N, the infinite parameter model has less predictive information for all Nsmaller than some critical value Nc∼/bracketleftbiggK 2Aνlog2/parenleftbiggK 2A/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg1/ν . (91) In the regime N <<Nc, it is possible to achieve more efficient prediction by try- ing to learn the (asymptotically) more complex model, as ill ustrated concretely in simulations of the density estimation problem (Nemenman and Bialek 2000). Even if there are a finite number of parameters—such as the fini te number of 13As emphasized above, many other learning problems, includi ng learning a function from noisy examples, can be seen as the learning of a probabilisti c model. Thus we expect that this description applies to a much wider range of biological learning tasks. 39synapses in a small volume of the brain—this number may be so l arge that we always have N << N c, so that it may be more effective to think of the many parameter model as approximating a continuous or nonparame tric one. It is tempting to suggest that the regime N << N cis the relevant one for much of biology. If we consider, for example, 10 mm2of inferotemporal cortex devoted to object recognition (Logothetis and Sheinberg 19 96), the number of synapses is K∼5×109. On the other hand, object recognition depends on foveation, and we move our eyes roughly three times per secon d throughout perhaps 15 years of waking life during which we master the art of object recog- nition. This limits us to at most N∼109examples. Remembering that we must haveν <1, even with large values of AEq. (91) suggests that we operate with N <Nc. One can make similar arguments about very different brains, such as the mushroom bodies in insects (Capaldi, Robinson and Fahrb ach 1999). If this identification of biological learning with the regime N << N cis correct, then the success of learning in animals must depend on strategies that implement sensible priors over the space of possible models. There is one clear empirical hint that humans can make effecti ve use of models that are beyond finite parameterization (in the sense that predictive information diverges as a power–law), and this comes from st udies of language. Long ago, Shannon (1951) used the knowledge of native speake rs to place bounds on the entropy of written English, and his strategy made expl icit use of pre- dictability. Shannon showed N–letter sequences to native speakers (readers), asked them to guess the next letter, and recorded how many gue sses were re- quired before they got the right answer. Thus each letter in t he text is turned into a number, and the entropy of the distribution of these nu mbers is an upper bound on the conditional entropy ℓ(N) [cf. Eq. (8)]. Shannon himself thought that the convergence as Nbecomes large was rather quick, and quoted an es- timate of the extensive entropy per letter S0. Many years later, Hilberg (1990) reanalyzed Shannon’s data and found that the approach to ext ensivity in fact was very slow: certainly there is evidence for a large compon entS1(N)∝N1/2, and this may even dominate the extensive component for acces sibleN. Ebel- ing and P¨ oschel (1994; see also P¨ oschel, Ebeling, and Ros´ e 1995) studied the statistics of letter sequences in long texts (like Moby Dick ) and found the same strong subextensive component. It would be attractive to re peat Shannon’s experiments with a slightly different design that emphasize s the detection of subextensive terms at large N.14 In summary, we believe that our analysis of predictive infor mation solves the problem of measuring the complexity of time series. This analysis unifies ideas from learning theory, coding theory, dynamical syste ms, and statistical 14Associated with the slow approach to extensivity is a large m utual information between words or characters separated by long distances, and severa l groups have found that this mutual information declines as a power law. Cover and King (1 978) criticize such observations by noting that such behavior is impossible in Markov chains o f arbitrary order. While it is possible that existing mutual information data have not rea ched asymptotia, the criticism of Cover and King misses the possibility that language is nota Markov process. Of course it cannot be Markovian if it has a power–law divergence in the pr edictive information. 40mechanics. In particular we have focused attention on a clas s of processes that are qualitatively more complex than those treated in co nventional learning theory, and there are several reasons to think that this clas s includes many examples of relevance to biology and cognition. Acknowledgements We thank V. Balasubramanian, A. Bell, S. Bruder, C. Callan, A . Fairhall, G. Garcia de Polavieja Embid, R. Koberle, A. Libchaber, A. Me likidze, A. Mikhailov, O. Motrunich, R. Rumiati, R. de Ruyter van Steven inck, N. Slonim, T. Spencer, S. Still, S. Strong, and A. Treves for many helpfu l discussions. Our collaboration was aided in part by a grant from the US–Israel Binational Science Foundation to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and work a t Princeton was supported in part by funds from NEC. 6 References Abarbanel, H. D. I., Brown, R., Sidorowich, J. J., & Tsimring L. S. (1993). The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems, Revs. Mod. Phys. 65,1331–1392. Adami, C., & Cerf N. J. (2000). Physical complexity of symbol ic sequences. Physica D 137, 62–69. See also adap-org/9605002.15 Aida, T. (1999). Field theoretical analysis of on–line lear ning of probability dis- tributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83,3554–3557. See also cond-mat/9911474. Akaike, H. (1974a). Information theory and an extension of t he maximum likelihood principle, in Second international symposium of information theory, B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, eds. Budapest: (Akademia Kiedo, Budapest). Akaike, H. (1974b). A new look at the statistical model ident ification, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control. 19,716–723. Atick, J. J. (1992). Could information theory provide an eco logical theory of sensory processing? In Princeton Lectures on Biophysics, W. Bialek, ed., pp. 223–289 (World Scientific, Singapore). Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual p erception, Psych. Rev.61,183–193. Balasubramanian, V. (1997). Statistical inference, Occam ’s razor, and statisti- cal mechanics on the space of probability distributions, Neural Comp. 9, 349–368. See also cond-mat/9601030. 15Where available, we give references to the Los Alamos e–prin t archive. Papers may be retrieved from the web site http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/*/* , where */*is the reference; thus Adami and Cerf (2000) is found at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/adap-org/9605002 . For preprints this is a primary reference; for published papers there may b e differences between the published version and the e–print. 41Barlow, H. B. (1959). Sensory mechanisms, the reduction of r edundancy and intelligence, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Mechanization of Thought Processes, vol. 2, D. V. Blake and A. M. Uttley, eds., pp. 537– 574 (H. M. Stationery Office, London). Barlow, H. B. (1961). Possible principles underlying the tr ansformation of sen- sory messages, in Sensory Communication, W. Rosenblith, ed., pp. 217– 234 (MIT Press, Cambridge). Barlow, H. B. (1983). Intelligence, guesswork, language, Nature 304,207–209. Bennett, C. H. (1990). How to define complexity in physics, an d why, in Com- plexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, W. H. Zurek, ed., pp. 137–148 (Addison–Wesley, Redwood City). Bialek, W. (1995). Predictive information and the complexi ty of time series, NEC Research Institute technical note. Bialek, W., Callan, C. G., & Strong, S. P. (1996). Field theor ies for learning probability distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77,4693–4697. See also cond-mat/9607180. Bialek, W., & Tishby, N. (1999). Predictive information, pr eprint. Available at cond-mat/9902341. Bialek, W., & Tishby, N. (in preparation). Extracting relev ant information. Brenner, N., Bialek, W., & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. (2000 ). Adaptive rescaling optimizes information transmission, Neuron 26,695–702. Bruder, S. D. (1998). Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton Univer sity. Capaldi, E. A., Robinson, G. E., & Fahrbach S. E. (1999). Neur oethology of spatial learning: The birds and the bees, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 651–682. Carpenter, R. H. S., & Williams, M. L. L. (1995). Neural compu tation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature 377,59–62. Chaitin, G. J. (1975). A theory of program size formally iden tical to information theory. J. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 22,329–340. Clarke, B. S., & Barron A. R. (1990). Information–theoretic asymptotics of Bayes methods. IEEE Trans. Inf. Thy. 36,453–471. Cover, T. M., & King, R. C. (1978). A convergent gambling esti mate of the entropy of English, IEEE Trans. Inf. Thy. 24,413–421. Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, New York). Crutchfield, J. P., & Feldman, D. P. (1997). Statistical comp lexity of simple 1–d spin systems. Phys. Rev. E 55,1239–1243R. See also cond-mat/9702191. Crutchfield, J. P., Feldman, D. P., & Shalizi C. R. (1999). Com ment on “Simple measure for complexity,” preprint. Available at chao-dyn/ 9907001. Crutchfield, J. P., & Shalizi, C. R. (1998). Thermodynamic de pth of casual states: objective complexity via minimal representation. Phys. Rev. E 4259,275–283. See also cond-mat/9808147. Crutchfield, J. P., & Young, K. (1989). Inferring statistica l complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63,105–108. Ebeling, W., & P¨ oschel, T. (1994). Entropy and long-range c orrelations in literary English, Europhys. Lett. 26,241–246. Feldman, D. P., & Crutchfield, J. P. (1998). Measures of stati stical complexity: why?, Phys. Lett. A 238,244–252. See also cond-mat/9708186. Gell–Mann, M., & Lloyd, S. (1996). Information measures, eff ective complexity, and total information. Complexity 2,44–52. de Gennes, P.–G. (1979). Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell Uni- versity Press, Ithaca and London). Grassberger, P. (1986). Toward a quantitative theory of sel f–generated com- plexity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25, 907–938. Haussler, D., Kearns, M., Seung, S., & Tishby, N. (1996). Rig orous learning curve bounds from statistical mechanics, Machine Learning 25,195–236. Hawken, M. J., & Parker, A. J. (1991). Spatial receptive field organization in monkey V1 and its relationship to the cone mosaic, in Computational models of visual processing, M. S. Landy and J. A. Movshon, eds., pp. 83–93 (MIT Press, Cambridge) Herschkowitz, D., & Nadal, J.–P. (1999). Unsupervised and s upervised learning: mutual information between parameters and observations, Phys. Rev. E , 59,3344–3360. Hilberg, W. (1990). The well–known lower bound of informati on in written language: Is it a misinterpretation of Shannon experiments ? (in German) Frequenz 44,243–248. Holy, T. E. (1997). Analysis of data from continuous probabi lity distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79,3545–3548. See also physics/9706015. Kemeney, J. G. (1953). The use of simplicity in induction. Philos. Rev. 62, 391–315. Kolmogoroff, A. (1939). Sur l’interpolation et extrapolati ons des suites sta- tionnaires, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 208,2043–2045. Kolmogorov, A. N. (1941). Interpolation and extrapolation of stationary ran- dom sequences (in Russian), in Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser. Mat. 5,3–14; translation in Selected Works of A. N. Kolmogorov, vol. II. A. N. Shiryagev, ed., pp. 272–280 (Kluwer Academic Publishe rs, Dor- drecht, The Netherlands). Kolmogorov, A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the quantitat ive definition of information. Prob. Inf. Trans. 1,4–7. Li, M., & Vit´ anyi, P. (1993). An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications (Springer-Verlag, New York). Lloyd, S., & Pagels, H. (1988). Complexity as thermodynamic depth, Ann. 43Phys.188,186–213. Logothetis, N. K., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object r ecognition, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19,577–621. Lopes, L. L., & Oden, G. C. (1987). Distinguishing between ra ndom and non- random events, J. Exp. Psych.: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13, 392–400. Lopez–Ruiz, R., Mancini, H. L., & Calbet, X. (1995). A statis tical measure of complexity. Phys. Lett. A 209,321–326. MacKay, D. J. C. (1992). Bayesian interpolation, Neural Comp. 4,415–447. Nemenman, I. (2000). Ph.D. Dissertation. Princeton Univer sity. Nemenman, I., & Bialek, W. (2000). Learning a continuous dis tribution: Sim- ulations with field theoretic priors, preprint. Opper, M. (1994). Learning and generalization in a two-laye r neural network: the role of the Vapnik–Chervonenkis dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2113–2116. Opper, M., & Haussler, D. (1995). Bounds for predictive erro rs in the statistical mechanics of supervised learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3772–3775. Periwal, V. (1997). Reparametrization invariant statisti cal inference and grav- ity,Phys. Rev. Lett. 78,4671–4674. See also hep-th/9703135. Periwal, V. (1998). Geometrical statistical inference, Nucl. Phys. B 554[FS], 719–730. See also adap-org/9801001. P¨ oschel, T., Ebeling, W., & Ros´ e, H. (1995). Guessing prob ability distributions from small samples, J. Stat. Phys. 80,1443–1452. Rieke, F., Warland, D., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R., & Biale k, W. (1997). Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code, (MIT Press, Cambridge). Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description ,Automatica ,14, 465–471. Rissanen, J. (1984). Universal coding, information, predi ction, and estimation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Thy. 30,629–636. Rissanen, J. (1986). Stochastic complexity and modeling. Ann. Statist. 14, 1080–1100. Rissanen, J. (1987). Stochastic complexity, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B ,49,223–239, 253–265. Rissanen, J. (1989). Stochastic Complexity and Statistical Inquiry (World Sci- entific, Singapore). Rissanen, J. (1996). Fisher information and stochastic com plexity. IEEE Trans. Inf. Thy. 42,40–47. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statisti cal learning by 8–month–old infants, Science 274,1926–1928. Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. H., & Newport, E. L. (1 999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults, Cognition 70, 4427–52. Seung, H. S., Sompolinsky, H., & Tishby, N. (1992). Statisti cal mechanics of learning from examples. Phys. Rev. A 45,6056–6091. Shalizi, C. R., & Crutchfield, J. P. (1999). Computational me chanics: pattern and prediction, structure and simplicity, preprint. Avail able at cond- mat/9907176. Shiner, J., Davison, M., & Landsberger, P. (1999). Simple me asure for com- plexity. Phys. Rev. E 59,1459–1464. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communicati on,Bell Sys. Tech. J. 27,379–423, 623–656. Reprinted in C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illi- nois Press, Urbana, 1949). Shannon, C. E. (1951). Prediction and entropy of printed Eng lish,Bell Sys. Tech. J. 30,50–64. Reprinted in N. J. A. Sloane and A. D. Wyner, eds.,Claude Elwood Shannon: Collected papers (IEEE Press, New York, 1993). Smirnakis, S., Berry III, M. J., Warland, D. K., Bialek, W., & Meister, M. (1997). Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale,Nature 386,69–73. Sole, R. V., & Luque, B. (1999). Statistical measures of comp lexity for strongly interacting systems, preprint. Available at adap-org/990 9002. Solomonoff, R. J. (1964). A formal theory of inductive infere nce,Inform. and Control 7,1–22, 224–254. Tishby, N., Pereira, F., & Bialek, W. (1999). The informatio n bottleneck method, in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Allerton Conference on Com- munication, Control and Computing, B. Hajek and R. S. Sreenivas, eds., pp. 368–377 (University of Illinois). See also physics/000 4057 Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory (John Wiley & Sons, New York). Vit´ anyi, P., & Li, M. (2000). Minimum description length in duction, Bayesian- ism, and Kolmogorov Complexity, IEEE Trans. Inf. Thy. 46,446–464. See also cs.LG/9901014. Weigend, A. S., & Gershenfeld, N. A., eds. (1994). Time series prediction: Fore- casting the future and understanding the past (Addison–Wesley, Reading MA). Wiener, N. (1949). Extrapolation, Interpolation and Smoothing of Time Series (Wiley, New York). 45

arXiv:physics/0007071v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 20 Jul 2000MAGNETIC FIELD OF RELATIVISTIC NONLINEAR PLASMA WAVE Arsen G. Khachatryan Yerevan Physics Institute, Alikhanian Brothers Street 2, Yerevan 375036, Armenia e-mail: khachatr@moon.yerphi.am Longitudinal and transverse behavior of magnetic field of re lativistic non- linear three-dimensional plasma wave is investigated. It i s shown that the magnetic field of the wave is different from zero and performs h igher fre- quency oscillations compared to the plasma electron freque ncy. An increase in the nonlinearity leads to strengthening of magnetic field . The oscillations of magnetic field in transverse direction arise, that caused by the phase front curving of nonlinear plasma wave. The numerical results wel l conform with predictions of the analytical consideration of weakly-non linear case. PACS number(s): 52.35.Mw, 52.40.Mj, 52.40.Nk The progress in the technology of ultrahigh intensity laser s and high cur- rent relativistic charged bunch sources permits the use of l aser pulses1or charged bunches2for excitation of strong plasma waves. The excited plasma waves can be used, for example, for acceleration of charged p articles and focusing of bunches.2The amplitude of longitudinal electric field Emaxof rel- ativistic plasma waves excited in cold plasma is limited by t he relativistic wave-breaking field3Erel= [2(γ−1)]1/2EWB/β, where γ= (1−β2)−1/2is a relativistic factor, β=vph/cis a dimensionless phase velocity of the wave, EWB=meωpevph/e(EWB[V/cm ]≈0.96n1/2 p[cm−3]) is the conventional non- relativistic wave-breaking field, ωpe= (4πnpe2/me)1/2is the electron plasma frequency, npis the equilibrium density of plasma electrons, meandeare the mass and absolute value of the electron charge. The linear plasma wave theory is valid when Emax≪EWB. It is well known that a three-dimensional linear plasma wave in a cold p lasma and in the absence of external fields is potential.4In this case the magnetic field of plasma wave is zero. The magnetic field is absent also in one-d imensional nonlinear case due to the symmetry of the problem. However, m agnetic field of nonlinear three-dimensional plasma wave with the re lativistic phase velocity ( β≈1) was not studied up to now and our aim is to investigate this problem. 1We shall study nonlinear plasma waves (wake waves) excited i n cold plasma by relativistic electron bunches or intense laser pu lses (drivers) and suppose the azimuthal symmetry of the problem. In this case f or non-zero components of plasma electrons momentum and electromagnet ic field of the wave we have the following set of equations5,6: β∂Pz ∂z−∂γe ∂z−β2Ez= 0, (1) β∂Pr ∂z−∂γe ∂r−β2Er= 0, (2) −∂Hθ ∂z+β∂Er ∂z+βrNe= 0, (3) ∇⊥Hθ+β∂Ez ∂z+βzNe+βα= 0, (4) β∂Hθ ∂z−∂Er ∂z+∂Ez ∂r= 0, (5) Ne= 1−α− ∇⊥Er−∂Ez ∂z. (6) As usual, the Eqs. (1) and (2) were derived taking into accoun t that the curl of the generalized momentum is zero, β2H−rotP= 0, or in our case β2Hθ+∂Pz ∂r−∂Pr ∂z= 0. (7) In Eqs. (1) - (6) γe= (1+ P2 z+P2 r+a2/2)1/2,βz, r=Pz, r/γeandNe=ne/np are respectively a relativistic factor, dimensionless com ponents of velocity and dimensionless density of plasma electrons, z= (ωpe/vph)(Z−vpht), α= nb(z, r)/np,nbis density of bunch electrons, a=eE0(z, r)/mecω0, where E0 andω0are the amplitude and frequency of laser pulse, ∇⊥=∂/∂r+1/r. Also the following dimensionless variables have been used: the s pace variables are normalized on λp/2π=vph/ωpe, where λpis the linear plasma wavelength, the momenta and velocities - respectively on mecand the velocity of light and the strengths of electric and magnetic fields - on the nonr elativistic wave- breaking field EWB. In the general case the analytical consideration of the problem seems impossible. First we consider weakly-nonlin ear case and then present numerical results. 2In the weakly-nonlinear case we suppose β= 1 and use the generaliza- tion of the well known expansion7which was used to study one-dimensional nonlinear relativistic-plasma-waves8: u(r, z) = εu1(r,Ψ) +ε2u2(r,Ψ) +ε3u3(r,Ψ) +..., (8) ∂Ψ/∂z= 1 + εk1(r) +ε2k2(r) +..., where ustands for normalized values Pz,r,Ez,rorHθ,ε=Emax z≪1 is the small parameter, Pz,r,Ez,r,Hθ≪1, Λ pis the nonlinear plasma wavelength. Substituting expansion (8) into equations (1)-(5) we have: ∂Pzi ∂Ψ−Ezi=S1,i, (9) ∂Pri ∂Ψ−Eri=S2,i (10) −∂Hθi ∂Ψ+∂Eri ∂Ψ+Pri=S3,i, (11) ∇⊥Hθi+∂Ezi ∂Ψ+Pzi=S4,i, (12) ∂Hθi ∂Ψ−∂Eri ∂Ψ+∂Ezi ∂Ψ=S5,i, (13) where subscript idenotes the order of approximation and S1−5,iare the non- linear functions of ui−1,ui−2,..., andu1. In the linear case ( i= 1)S1−5,1= 0 and one can obtain well known solutions (see, e.g., Ref. 9): Pz1=−Rsin Ψ, Pr1= (dR/dr ) cosΨ , Ez1=−Rcos Ψ, Er1=−(dR/dr ) sin Ψ ,andHθ1= 0, where R(r) depends on the radial distribution in the exciting source, i. e., onα(r) ora2(r). In the second approximation, from the condition of absenc e of resonance terms (proportional to sin Ψ or cos Ψ) one can find thatk1= 0. Then S1,2= (1/2)∂(P2 r1+P2 z1)/∂Ψ, S2,2= (1/2)∂(P2 r1+P2 z1)/∂r, S3,2=Pr1(∇⊥Er1+∂Ez1/∂Ψ), S4,2=Pz1(∇⊥Er1+∂Ez1/∂Ψ), S5,2= 0, 3and for magnetic field strength we obtain the following equat ion: [(∂/∂r)∇⊥−1]Hθ2=∂S4,2/∂r−∂S3,2/∂Ψ. (14) Solution of this equation is Hθ2=f1(r) +f2(r) cos(2Ψ) , (15) where f1,2(r) satisfies to equations (∆⊥−r−2−1)f1= (1/2)(d/dr)[R(∆⊥−1)R], (∆⊥−r−2−1)f2= (1/2)[(dR/dr )∆⊥R−R(d/dr)∆⊥R], here ∆ ⊥=∇⊥(d/dr) is the transverse part of Laplacian. In the i−th approximation Hθi∼cos(iΨ). The dependence k2(r) can be obtained in the third approximation. So, the weakly-nonlinear theory p redicts that the magnetic field of 3D nonlinear plasma wave is not zero, in oppo site to the 3D linear case and to 1D nonlinear one, and oscillates at the h armonics of the linear plasma frequency; the nonlinear wavelength chan ges in the radial direction. We have solved Eqs. (1) - (6) numerically choosing the Gaussi an profile of the driver both in longitudinal and transverse direction s: A(z, r) =A0exp[−(z−z0)2/σ2 z] exp(−r2/σ2 r), (16) where A(z, r) stands for αora2. Fig. 1 shows three-dimensional linear plasma wave excited by relativistic electron bunch. The lin ear numerical solution obtained well agreed with predictions of the linea r theory.2As is seen in Figure 1(b), in the linear case the magnetic field exci ted in plasma is localized in the range occupied by the bunch and in the wake Emax z≫ Hmax θ≈0, that correspond to the linear theory. In the nonlinear regime the behavior of plasma waves is quali tatively changed. In Fig. 2 one can see a nonlinear plasma wave that is e xcited by an intense laser pulse. The main difference here from the line ar case is the change of shape and length of the wave with the radial coordin ater[see Fig. 2(a)]. The magnetic field strength in the nonlinear plasma wa ve as shown in Figure 2(b) is different from zero and has the magnitude compa rable with that of other components of the field. The magnitude of higher frequency 4oscillations (as compared to the plasma frequency) perform ed by the mag- netic field along zgrows in proportion to the nonlinearity. Such a behavior of magnetic field is a purely nonlinear effect. Indeed, in the lin ear case Hθ= 0, i.e., the contribution of momentum components at the plasma frequency in the expression (7) is compensated. The nonlinearity of the w ave implies a rise of higher harmonics in PzandPr. According to (7), the rise of magnetic field is due to these harmonics and this accounts for frequent oscillations seen in Figure 2(b), that conforms with the weakly-nonlinear ana lytical considera- tion presented above. On the other hand, the non-zero magnet ic field means, according to (7), that the motion of plasma electrons in the n onlinear wave is turbulent ( rotP/negationslash= 0). The degree of turbulence (the measure of which is Hθ) grows in proportion to the nonlinearity. It is easy to see that due to the dependence of the wavelength o nr, the field in the radial direction grows more chaotic as the distan ce from the driver increases. In fact, the oscillations of plasma for different rare ”started” behind the driver with nearly equal phases but different wave lengths [see Fig. 2(a)]. As |z|increases, the change of phase in transverse direction (for fixedz) becomes more and more marked. This leads to a curving of the p hase front and to ”oscillations” in the transverse direction.6,10The radial behavior of the longitudinal electric field and magnetic field of the no nlinear plasma wave is presented in Fig. 3. Qualitatively the radial depend ence of the field differs from that of the linear case by the change of sign and ”s teepening” of fields along rand that is connected with the curvature of wave phase front. So, we have found that the magnetic field of nonlinear plasma w ave is different from zero and performs higher frequency oscillati ons as compared to the plasma frequency. The latter qualitatively differs fr om the linear case and one-dimensional nonlinear one. The obtained numer ical results well agreed with the predictions of weakly-nonlinear theory. REFERENCES 1T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267 (1979). 2R. D. Ruth, A. W. Chao, P. L. Morton, and P. B. Wilson, Part. Acc el. 17, 171 (1985); P. Chen, Part. Accel. 20, 171 (1987). 3A. I. Akhiezer and R .V. Polovin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30, 915 (1956) [Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 696 (1956)]. 4N. A. Krall and A. W. Trivelpice, Principles of Plasma Physics (McGraw- Hill Book Co., NY, 1973). 55B. N. Breizman, T. Tajima, D. L. Fisher, and P. Z. Chebotaev, I n: Research Trends in Physics: Coherent Radiation and Particl e Acceleration , edited by A. Prokhorov (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992), pp. 263-287; K. V. Lotov, Phys. Plasmas 5, 785 (1998). 6A. G. Khachatryan and S. S. Elbakian. Two-dimensional nonli near regime in the Plasma Wakefield Accelerator, Proceedings PAC ’99, edited by A.Luccio and W.MacKay (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1999), pp. 3 663-3665. 7G. B. Witham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (Wiley, New York, 1974), Chap. 13. 8A. G. Khachatryan, Phys. Rev. E 58, 7799 (1998). 9R. Keinigs and M. E. Jones, Phys. Fluids 30, 252 (1987); A. G. Khacha- tryan, A. Ts. Amatuni, S. S. Elbakian, and E. V. Sekhpossian, Plasma Phys. Rep.22, 576 (1996). 10A. G. Khachatryan, Phys. Rev. E 60, 6210 (1999). FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1. The linear plasma wave excited by an electron bunch with gaussian profile; α0= 0.1,σz= 2,σr= 0.5,γ= 10. (a). The dimensionless strength of longitudinal electric field. 1— Ez(z) at the axis, r= 0; 2 — r= 1; 3 —r= 2. (b). The strength of azimuthal magnetic field. 1 — r= 0.2; 2 —r= 0.75; 3 — r= 2. Figure 2. The nonlinear plasma wave excited by laser pulse. T he pulse parameters are : a2 0= 3.6,σz= 2,σr= 5,γ= 10. (a). The longitudinal electric field Ez.r= 0,2,4 and 5 in the order of magnitude reduction. (b). The magnetic field strength. 1 — r= 2; 2 — r= 4. Figure 3. The radial behavior of field for the case given in Fig ure 2 for z=−25.1 — longitudinal electric field Ez(z=−25, r); 2 — magnetic field Hθ(z=−25, r). 6Figure 1. A. G. Khachatryan -0.05-0.03-0.010.010.030.05 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 (a)zEz 123 -0.025-0.015-0.0050.005 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 (b)zHθ 1 23Figure 2. A. G. Khachatryan -1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.200.20.40.60.81 -25-20-15-10 -5 0 (a)zEz -0.25-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.0500.050.10.150.2 -25-20-15-10 -5 0Hθ z12 (b)Figure 3. A. G. Khachatryan -0.8-0.6-0.4-0.200.20.4 0 5 10 151 2 r

arXiv:physics/0007072v1 [physics.acc-ph] 20 Jul 20001 Laser Cooling of TeV Muons∗Fermilab-Conf-00/162 Fritz DeJongha aFermi National Accelerator Laboratory, fritzd@fnal.gov We show that Compton scattering can be used to cool TeV-scale muon beams, and we derive analytical expressions for the equilibrium transverse angular spread , longitudinal energy spread, and power requirements. We find that a factor of a few thousand reduction in emittance i s possible for a 3 TeV muon collider. 1. Introduction Muon colliders are a possible future tool for the exploration of physics at the TeV scale and beyond. The current status of the developent of the muon collider concept is described in Ref. [1], which includes a description of a 3 TeV center-of- mass (COM) machine. One of the major challenges to realizing a high- luminosity muon collider is to cool the diffuse bunches of muons produced in pion decays. Much effort is being put into the problem of quickly cooling these bunches at the front-end of a muon- collider and maintaining the low emittance while bunches are being accelerated and brought into collision. For the 3 TeV COM machine, the problems of neutrino radiation [2] and power consumption are already becoming prohibitive. Additional cooling of the bunches after acceleration would mitigate these problems by allowing a given luminosity to be attained with fewer stored muons and a lower repitition rate, and allow consideration of even higher energy muon colliders. For example, the tunnels and high-field magnets being discussed for future hadron colliders [3] could ultimately be used for a 100 TeV-scale muon collider. Post- acceleration cooling would also reduce detector backgrounds from muon decay. The possibility of using Compton scattering for cooling of electron bunches for γγcollid- ers has been previously considered [4]. The lu- minosity for e+e−collisions is already limited by beamstrahlung effects, but additional cooling may greatly improve the γγluminosity. ∗Contributed to the NuFAct’00 International Workshop.We propose herein the possibility of post- acceleration cooling of muons beams using Comp- ton scattering. 2. Compton Scattering The Compton Scattering cross-section, in the rest frame of the muon, is: dσ dΩ=α2 2m2/parenleftbiggk′ k/parenrightbigg2/parenleftbiggk′ k+k k′−sin2θ/parenrightbigg , (1) where k′=k 1 + (k/m)(1−cosθ)(2) andkis the incoming photon energy, k′is the out- going photon energy, and θis the photon scatter- ing angle. For k≪m,k′≈kand the scattering is roughly isotropic: dσ dΩ∝(1 + cos2θ), (3) and the total cross-section is given by: σC=8π 3α2 m2=8π 3r2 µ (4) where r2 µis the classical muon radius. Thus, com- pared to electrons, the cross-section is reduced by ≈4×104. As an example, to expect 1 collision with a 0.1 eV photon, the light energy density would need to be 10 J /(µm)2. Consider a beam of muons, with energy and momentum defined by β,γ,Eµ, andpµ, colliding head-on with a mono-energetic beam of photons2 with energy Eγ. We will approximate β= 1. The energy of the photons in the muon rest frame is: E∗ γ=γEγ(1 +β)≈2γEγ. (5) On average, the photon will transfer longitudinal momentum E∗ γto the muon. In the lab frame, Eµ→Eµ−2γ2Eγ. (6) Typically, the muon will receive a smaller trans- verse kick: pTµ≈γEγ. (7) Therefore, for large γ, the muon is essentially slowed down without changing direction. If lower photon energies are needed, this can ef- fectively be achieved by aiming the photon beam at an angle θrelative to the head-on direction. The transverse momentum of the photon is incon- sequential. The effective photon energy becomes: Eγ→Eγ(1 + cos θ)/2. (8) 3. Cooling Effect For simplicity, we consider the case that the the muons undergo on average one Compton scatter- ing, and are afterwards reaccelerated to compen- sate for the average energy loss. The following conclusions are also valid for any average number of scatterings, as long as the relative energy loss is small. Transversely, a muon has a small angle αrela- tive to the beam direction in a plane, for example thex−zplane. After the scattering, αremains unchanged, within an amount Eγ/m. After reac- celeration, α→α(1−2γEγ/m). (9) Thus, the angular spread can be reduced, in the same way as for ionization cooling at low energy. There is also a heating effect from the spread in the transverse kick. The average increase in the variance of αis equal to that for one Compton scattering: σ2 α→σ2 α+6 5/parenleftbiggEγ m/parenrightbigg2 . (10)To find the equilibrium angular spread we equate the cooling and heating effects to find: σα=/radicalBigg 3 10Eγ Eµ. (11) Luminosity is inversely proportional to the sums of the emittances of the two colliding beams. It is also proportional to the product of the num- bers of muons in the two beams. This prod- uct decays with a time constant of one-half the muon lifetime. For a fractionally small energy loss per collision, the number of Compton scat- terings needed to reduce σαby a factor of 1 /eis given by: n=m 2γEγ(12) The total energy used to reaccelerate the muon after these ncollisions is equal the original muon energy: Ereacc=Eµ. (13) The power density needed to attain this factor in one-half muon lifetime is given by: p=nEγ σCγτµ/2=3 8πm γ2τµr2µ. (14) Thus, the power required decreases as the square of the muon energy increases. Longitudinally, since the average energy loss in a Compton scattering is greater the higher the muon energy, there is an energy bunching effect. ForσEµ≪Eµ, and the average case of one Comp- ton scattering, the bunching effect is: σEµ→σEµ−σEµ Eµ4γ2Eγ. (15) There are also two sources of energy heating. The first is from the variance in the number of Comp- ton scatterings of the muon, given by Poisson statistics. This leads to a variance in the en- ergy spread of (2 γ2Eγ)2. The second is from the variance in the energy spread within one Comp- ton scattering, given by 2 /5 (2γ2Eγ)2. The total heating effect is then: σ2 Eµ→σ2 Eµ+ (2γ2Eγ)2+2 5(2γ2Eγ)2. (16)3 Equating the heating and cooling effects, we find for the equilibrium energy spread: σEµ Eµ=/radicalbigg 7 10EµEγ m2. (17) We have checked these derivations with a sim- ple Monte Carlo simulation of a set of muons undergoing repeated Compton scatterings and boosts. The predictions of these equations are in excellent quantitative agreement with the sim- ulation. 4. Power Considerations In principle, Compton scattering could be used to cool low-energy muons. Unfortunately, our es- timates show that the power requirements would be prohibitive by many orders of magnitude. However, as shown in Eq. 14, the power density needed decreases as the square of the muon en- ergy increases, and may be reasonable at TeV en- ergies. Two other general considerations affect how the power needed scales with the muon energy. First, the muons will be in a storage ring. The pho- ton pulses can be placed in a cavity and reused once per turn of the muons around the ring, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The size of the ring, and therefore the time per turn, is proportional to the muon energy. For a lower muon energy, the pho- ton pulses can be reused at a faster rate. There- fore, for this scheme, the power needed to produce the photons scales as only 1 /E. The second consideration is that the geomet- ric emittance, and therefore spot size, decreases linearly as the muon bunch is accelerated. There- fore, the area that needs to be illuminated, and the total power, decreases as the square of the muon energy. Putting these two considerations together, the power needed for cooling scales as 1/E3. The length of the muon bunch can also affect the amount of power needed. A laser beam can be focussed to collide with the muon bunch. The diffraction-limited spot size at the focus is pro- portional to the F-stop ( F). However, the depth of focus is proportional to F2. If the length of the muon bunch is too long, we will need to increase× ×× ×++ −−γγ γγ Figure 1. Configuration of resonant cavities and muon storage ring. On the left, each muon bunch collides head-on with a photon pulse. On the right, one-half cycle later, each photon pulse has reflected and collides head-on with the other muon bunch. the depth of focus, which implies increasing the spot size, which will require proportionally more total power. Finally, Eq. 14 gives only the cooling rate needed to compensate the luminosity for the muon decays. A cooling rate several times higher than this will be necessary to realize large in- creases in the luminosity. We also note that as cooling power is added, we also need to add RF power to reaccelerate the muons, as described in Eq. 13. Although a lot of additional power will be needed for the laser and RF systems, a much lower repitition rate will be needed for a given luminosity, and thus the power consumption for the facility as a whole may be much lower. 5. Application to the 3 TeV Muon Collider We start with the parameters for the 3 TeV muon collider in Ref. [1]. The ring has a cir- cumference of 6 km, and contains 4 bunches at a time. We assume that this will be reduced to 1 bunch. We have assumed that the bunch length can be shortened to 1 mm. Midway between each crossing point, we place a resonant optical cavity. This is illustrated in Fig. 1. Each cavity contains4 Table 1 Parameters of the 3 TeV COM muon collider and possible laser c ooling systems. These parameters assume that the full emittance improvement will be attained in one luminosity lifetime. Ref. [1] CO 2laser Nd:Glass Laser Bunches/fill 4 1 1 Rep. rate (Hz) 15 1 1 Initial beam width ( µm) 3.2 3.2 3.2 Initial bunch length (mm) 3.0 1.0 1.0 λ(µm) 10.6 1.05 Eγ(eV) 0.1 1.0 Emittance improvement 7000 2200 Energy spread (%) 0.16 0.3 1.0 F-stop 7 22 Diffraction-limited width ( µm) 43 13 Energy in photons (MJ) 4 0.4 Efficiency (%) 25 1 µ/bunch 2 ×10123×10115×1011 Tune shift 0.044 31 15 Luminosity (cm−2s−1) 7 ×10347×10347×1034 a photon pulse reflecting back and forth. The length of the cavity is set to 3 km, so that the light pulse hits a muon bunch in alternating di- rections once per reflection. The luminosity life- time is 15 msec, or 750 turns. Thus, the cavity should have a Q of ≈103. The length of the pho- ton pulse should be comparable to the β∗of the machine, or about 30 ps. Progress in improving laser intensity and de- creasing photon pulse widths has been very rapid [5]. For example, the Mercury project [6] is developing a 1.05 µm laser system that will generate 100 J at 10 Hz in 5 ns pulses at 10% efficiency. We have considered two types of laser systems to generate the necessary photon pulses: CO2lasers, which typically have a 10.6 µm wave- length and 25% efficiency, and Nd:Glass lasers, which typically have a 1.05 µm wavelength and 1% efficiency. The parameters of these laser sys- tems with the 3 TeV COM machine are shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, we can expect emit- tance improvements by a factor of a few thou-sand. However, the energy needed in the laser pulses is very high: Of order one MJ. The two laser cooling stations in Fig. 1 would probably need to be divided into several cooling stations each with a fraction of the laser energy. Short- ening the muon bunch length could also allow a considerable reduction in laser energy. It may be possible to exploit the reduction in beam size that occurs during the cooling process. Finally, a higher energy muon collider would also reduce the laser energy requirement. Some of the other parameters of the collider with laser cooling may present challenges for the machine design. The small emittance leads to a very high value of the tune shift. Also, the energy spreads are somewhat high, especially for the lower-wavelength laser. 6. Conclusions We have shown that Compton scattering can be used to cool muon beams. Eq. 11 and Eq. 17 describe the achievable transverse angular spread and longitudinal energy spread.5 While the power needed for laser cooling of muon beams is very high, it decreases as the cube of the muon energy increases, and may become practical by TeV energies. If so, emittance re- ductions by factors of a few thousand are possi- ble. This would allow a given luminosity to be attained with a much lower repitition rate, much less detector background from muon decays, and a much reduced neutrino radiation hazard. Sev- eral challenges remain to develop a plausible op- tical, laser, and machine system. 7. Acknowledgements Thanks to the organizers of the NuFact’00 International Workshop for the opportunity to present these results. Thanks to David Neuffer for several useful conversations. This work was performed at the Fermi Na- tional Accelerator Laboratory, which is operated by Universities Research Association, under con- tract DE-AC02-76CII03000with the U.S. Depart- ment of Energy. REFERENCES 1. C. M. Ankenbrandt et al. , Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2, 081001 (1999) [physics/9901022]. 2. N. Mokhov and A. Van Ginneken, Fermilab- Conf-00/065. 3. See the VLHC web site, http://www- ap.fnal.gov/VLHC/. 4. V. Telnov, hep-ex/0001028. 5. G. A. Mourou, C. P. J. Barty, and M. D. Perry, Physics Today, January 1998, 22. 6. The Mercury project, http://lasers.llnl.gov/lasers/lst/SSL/nif.htm.

arXiv:physics/0007073v1 [physics.optics] 21 Jul 2000Extinction theorem for ultrafast pulses Cs. Benedek, M. G. Benedict and T. Ser´ enyi Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Szeged, Tisza krt 84., H-6720, Szeged, Hungary benedict@physx.u-szeged.hu Instead of using a frequency dependent refractive index, we propose to use the extinction theorem to describe reflection and transmiss ion of an ultrashort pulse passing through the boundary. When the duration of the pulse is comparable with the relaxation time, the results differ sign ificantly from those given by the traditional method, especially if the carrier f requency is close to an absorbtion line. We compare the two approaches using the d ata of GaAs in the infrared domain. c/circlecopyrt2008 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: 320.7120, 350.5500 It is well known that the reflection and refraction of an elect romagnetic wave on the bound- ary of a material system is a light scattering phenomenon. Th e atoms in the medium are brought into oscillations by the incoming wave, and then sec ondary waves are generated by the induced atomic dipoles. The transmitted wave is the re sult of superposition of the scattered wave and the external field, while the reflected wav e is a result of backscattering. One side of the process, the solution of the quantum mechanic al equations of motion of the 1perturbed atoms (or the forced oscillations in the classica l model) is treated in most text- books in order to calculate the frequency dependence of the p olarizability and the dielectric constant. The other side of the problem, the actual scatteri ng process is usually replaced by phenomenological boundary conditions – Fresnel formulas – for the macroscopic fields. One then uses a frequency dependent index of refraction, and cal culates the response for each spectral component. Instead of that traditional approach which neglects the tra nsient regime of the forced oscillations, we use a procedure that exhibits the actual ph ysical process. This is the method of integral equations, known also as the Ewald-Oseen extinc tion theorem in the stationary situation.1We are going to consider here the one-dimensional variant of this theory applied to ultrafast pulses. We note that local field effects influence the coupled atom-fiel d dynamics, therefore it can affect the reflection and transmission properties too. Fo r weak fields this leads only to a constant shift2of the resonance frequencies, therefore we shall treat the p roblem here without this correction. The extinction theorem has been applied for the resonant non linear case in our works2–4 but with the slowly varying amplitude approximation (SVEA) in time. The first model calculation for a linear medium treating the full time devel opment of a pulse without SVEA has been given by one of us.6 We consider the boundary value problem for the transmission of a light pulse through a plane-parallel resonant layer consisting of polarizable atoms. Let the incoming field be a linearly polarized plane wave: Ein(x, t) =E(t−x/c) (1) 2We restrict ourselves here to the case of normal incidence. T hen the problem is one dimen- sional in space, thus the macroscopic field obeys the inhomog eneous wave equation: ∂2E ∂x2−1 c2∂2E ∂t2=1 ε0c2∂2P ∂t2. (2) In the situation considered here, Pis different from zero in a slab placed between x= 0 and x=L, and the solution of Eq.(2) has the form:2 E(x, t) =Ein(x, t)−1 2ε0c/integraldisplayL 0∂P ∂t(x′, t− |x−x′|/c)dx′. (3) HereEinis the solution of the homogeneous equation corresponding t o (2), and it is identified with the incoming wave, while the second term is a scattered w ave which is the superposition of outgoing elementary waves originating in different x′planes. Given an incoming wave, the transmitted wave is determined by the whole solution (3) at x≥L, while the reflected wave is described only by the second, integral term at x≤0. As we are considering the linear case, the dynamics of the pol arization Pin the medium can be determined by a first order perturbation theory. Suppo sing that at the beginning the system is in its ground state, the dipole moment density indu ced by the field is given by the following expression: P(t, x) =/summationdisplay jPj= 2NRe /summationdisplay ji|dj|2 ¯he(−iωj−γj 2)t×/integraldisplayt 0E(t′, x)e(iωj+γj 2)t′dt′/bracketrightbigg (4) where Nis the number density of the dipoles in the medium, djis the transition dipole matrix element between the ground state and the j-th excited level, ωjandγjare the corresponding transition frequencies and decay constants, and E(t, x) is the field strength at the position xof the atomic dipole. In the ordinary theory of dispersion th e time dependence of the electric field, E(t) is taken to be E0e−iωt, and after performing the integration in (4) the 3terms containing e−γt/2are omitted, as they are rapidly decaying. In this way one obt ains a frequency dependent susceptibility χ(ω) = (1 /ε0)/summationtext j(2N|dj|2/¯h)/(ωj−ω−iγj/2),and refractive index n= (1 + χ(ω))1/2. Our main point is that if the duration of the whole pulse is shorter than the decay time of the terms which contain e−γjt/2, this traditional approach fails, and all the terms following from (4) should be kept. In the case of an optically thin layer, the calculations can b e simplified. Then L/λ≪1, the spatial variation of the polarization can be neglected, and instead of integrating in Eq.(3) we can use the mean value of the time derivative of the polariz ation. In this thin medium case one can derive a system of coupled differential equations for the polarization components, Pj: .. Pj+. Pjγj+Pj(γ2 j 4+ω2 j) = 2 N|dj|2 ¯h(ωjEin−L 2ε0cωj/summationdisplay k. Pk) (5) For an arbitrary thick layer one has to solve the coupled inte gro-differential equations (3) and (4), with a numerical method. We have performed calculations, based on the theory given he re and compared the results with those of the traditional method of Fresnel formulas. Fo r definitness we have used the data5of GaAs in the infrared domain. Two resonant frequencies and the with constants λ1= 37.31µm,λ2= 0.4305µm,γ1= 0.034ω1,γ2= 0, ( λi= 2πc/ω i), and si:=2N|di|2 ε0¯hωi, withs1= 9.89,s2= 2.07. reproduced very well the measured5stationary dispersion and absorbtion of the material in the range λ= 1−102µm. For the sake of simplicity we have chosen the following form of the incoming pulse Ein(t) = sin2Ωtcosω0t, 0< t < π/ Ω. As we are considering the ultrafast regime we have chosen Ω = 0 .25ω0. The shape of this incoming pulse is shown in Fig. 1(a) below. The solution of Eq.(5) corr esponding to this incoming 4pulse and to the initial conditions Pj(0) = 0, ˙Pj(0) = 0, j= 1,2 can be given for the thin layer by an exact but lengthy formula. Far from resonance ( ω0≪ω1,ω0≫ω1) both methods predict the same results. On the other hand significant differences can be seen for pulses with ω0≈ω1, i.e. close to resonance, but still in the linear regime. The calculations were perfor med with ω0= 1.03ω1, for layers of different thicknesses of the order of the central waveleng th,λ0= 2πc/ω 0. Fig. 1 shows the results obtained for an optically thin layer L=λ0/256. In that case we have solved the system of equations (5). The numerical solution of Eqs. (3) and (4) a re shown in Fig. 2 for a layer of thickness of λ0. The continuous lines are the results obtained from the pres ent transient extinction theory, while the dashed lines are the amplitude s obtained by using the frequency dependent index of refraction. It can be seen, that some of th e overall characteristics of the response obtained by the two different methods are simila r. Both treatments predict significant broadening of the reflected and transmitted puls es, since the decay time, 2 /γis long compared with the duration of the excitation. In additi on, till the end of the exciting pulse, ω0t= 4π, the reflected amplitudes are very similar except for a littl e phase shift. The transmitted pulse appears in both cases with the same exp ected delay that can be calculated as tg=vg/L, where vgis the the group velocity.7,8This gives ω0tg= 7.96πin good agreement with the numerical result. We note, in additi on, that both methods yielded precursors7,8in the transmitted fields appearing at t=L/c, not seen in the figures, because of their smallness. In the case of the thin layer the forms of the fields are quite si milar, see Fig 1. On the other hand significant differences are seen in the time depend ences of the transmitted and reflected pulses calculated by the two different treatments i n layers of thickness comparable 5withλ0. We attribute these differences in the amplitudes, as well as in the phases to the approximative character of the time dependence of the polar ization in the Fourier method, i.e. to the omission of the transients at the beginning and at the end of the excitation. This part is non-negligible if the duration of the process is comparable with the relaxation time since it represents an important contribution to the el ementary waves generated by the induced dipoles. In conclusion, we find that for ultrafast pulses the properti es of a dispersive medium must be calculated by taking care of the transient response o f the system. This can be done best by using a fully time dependent treatment as proposed in the present work. We thank Z. Bor and Z. Horv´ ath for stimulating discussions. This work was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) under contr acts T022281 and T32920. 6References 1. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of optics 6th ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1989). 2. M.G. Benedict, A.M. Ermolaev, V.A. Malyshev, I.V. Sokolo v, and E.D. Trifonov, Superradiance (IOP, Bristol, 1996). 3. M.G. Benedict, E.D. Trifonov, “Coherent reflection as sup erradiation on the boundary of a resonant medium”, Phys. Rev. A 38, 2854-2862 (1988). 4. M.G. Benedict, V. A. Malyshev, E.D. Trifonov, A. I Zaitsev “Reflection and transmission of ultrashort light pulses through a thin resonant medium: Loc al field effects” Phys. Rev. A 43, 3845-3853 (1991). 5. E. D. Palik, ”Gallium Arsenide” in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids E. D. Palik, ed. (Academic Press, 1985), pp. 429-443. 6. M.G. Benedict, ”On the reflection and transmission of femt osecond pulses”, Proceedings of SPIE3573 486-489 (1998). 7. L. Brillouin, Wave propagation and group velocity (Academic Press, New York and London, 1960). 8. K. E. Oughstun, O. C. Sherman, Electromagnetic pulse propagation in causal dielectrics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994). 7List of figures Fig. 1. Incoming (a), reflected (b) and transmitted (c) ampli tudes for a layer of thick- nessL=λ/256. In (b) and (c) continuous lines are calculated from the e xtinction theorem, while he dashed lines are obtained using the index o f refraction. Fig. 2. Reflected (a) and transmitted (b) pulses calculated b y the two different methods (see caption of Fig 1.) for the incident pulse shown i n Fig. 1 (a), and for a layer of thickness L=λ0, In (c) the origin has been shifted to ω0t= 2π corresponding to t=L/c(the transit time in vacuum) 84π 8π 12π -1-0.50.51incoming pulse (a) ω0t 4π 8π 12π -0.4-0.20.20.4reflected pulse (b) ω0t 4π 8π 12π -1-0.50.51transmitted pulse (c) ω0t Figure 1. Cs. Benedek, Optics Letters 94π 8π 12π -1-0.50.51reflected pulse (a) ω0t 4π 8π 12π 16π -1-0.50.51transmitted pulse (b) ω0t Figure 2. Cs. Benedek, Optics Letters 10

arXiv:physics/0007074v1 [physics.gen-ph] 21 Jul 2000Complete Entangled Based Quantum Communication With Security. Arindam Mitra V.I.P Enclave, M - 403, Calcutta- 700059. India. February 20, 2014 Abstract If, due to some catastrophe, our classical communication sy s- tem is destroyed but quantum entangled state survived, in that entanglement age, it is widely believed, the whole worl d would be communication less. It is discussed that complete entangled based communication even with security is pos- sible. In this context, the notion of cheating-free Bell’s i n- equality test is introduced. 1Deutsch, in his foundational paper on quantum computation, suggested [1] that quantum entanglement can be used to generate quantum ke y, discov- ered by Bennett and Brassard [2] following Wiesner’s pionee ring work [3] on quantum cryptography. Bennett and Brassard used unentan gled state in their BB-84 seheme, so Deutsch’s suggestion was striking. B ut he did not elaborate the operational procedure. Ekert elaborated [4] Deutsch’s idea and pointed out that Bell’s theorem can be used to test eavesdrop ping. Although practical utilization of Bell’s theorem is interesting but it has been soon clear [5] that avoiding Bell’s inequality test, one can use EPR[6] correlation to de- tect eavesdropping. Be that as it may, finally it has been sett led that EPR and non EPR cryptosystems are two different type of cryptosys tems, but they have same physical property -the ability to detect eave sdropping. Bennett, Brassard and Mermin [5] carried out a comparative s tudy on these two cryptosystems. They concluded that only differenc e is that ran- dom data are jointly chosen by legitimate users in Non EPR cry ptosystem but in EPR protocol random data spontaneously originates du e to the mea- surements. In EPR system key does not exist - not even in the mi nd of legitimate users until measurement is performed. This seem s to be always true. So one can conjecture: entangled based pre-measureme nt key is impos- sible. Let us come to the teleportation scheme. In their famous pape r Bennett et al[7] argued successful teleportation without classical cha nnel requires superluminal signal. The presence of classical channel in t he teleportation process is reflected in the well known equation of teleportat ion: 1 ebit + 2 bit = 1 qubit. Recently we have shown classical channel can be replaced by quantum channel. According to our scheme, the above equat ion can be written as : 1 ebit + 2n qubit = 1 qubit. Here n qubits are equiva lent to 1 bit. Now the question is: can we write the above equation in th e following manner: 1 ebit + 2n ebit = 1 qubit ? This means entangled based c ommuni- cation can be a substitute of classical communication. Influ enced by earlier conjecture one can make another conjecture: ”entanglement by itself can not be used to transmit a classical message” [8]. Next we shall di scuss that both these conjectures are not true in our encoding-decoding pro cedure [9,10]. Let us recall the technique. The two different sequences of qu antum states 2encode Boolean 0 or 1. These two sequences can be the sequence s of random or pseudo-random numbers and information regarding these t wo mother se- quences is initially secretly shared between the legitimat e users. Repeatedly sending these two sequences arbitrarily long string of bit c an be generated. Now we shall use entangled state. Suppose Alice has a personal database which contains meanin gful data. She wants to transmit the database to her partner Bob station ed at far off distance only using entangled states. Suppose Alice posses ses a stockpile of EPR pairs. The n pairs (n is a medium large number) can be arran ged in two different ways to represent bit 0 and 1. Any pair in arrange ment can be described as, |ψ/an}bracketri}ht2n i,j=1= 1/√ 2(|↑/an}bracketri}ht1 i|↓/an}bracketri}ht2 j− |↓/an}bracketri}ht1 i|↑/an}bracketri}ht2 j), where i and j ( i/ne}ationslash=j) denote the position of any pair in the two arrange- ments which are not very close to each other. The information regarding the two arrangements ( S0andS1) is initially secretly shared between them. If Alice wants to send bit 0 from her database, she arranges n p airs ac- cording toS0and then send that sequence to Bob. Similarly she can send bit 1 by sending S1. Bob can easily recover the bit values from the incoming sequences by correlating the shared information regarding the two probable arrangements and the outcome of his sequence of measurement s. Let us il- lustrate a simple decoding process for a single sequence. Bo b first receives the sequence of EPR particles and store them in a quantum memo ry-cum- register. He sorts out n/2 pairs assuming they belong to S0and keep the n/2 pairs in ( n/2)×2 memory array marked 0. The remaining n/2 pairs (say n is even number)are assumed to belong to S1and kept in ( n/2)×2 memory array marked 1. At this stage she does not know which id entifica- tion is right. He measures the spin in vertical direction on E PR pairs ( each pair kept in a row). If the sequence is S0, then the results corresponding to rows of the array marked 0 will be either ” ↑,↓” and ” ↓,↑”. But the results corresponding to rows of array marked 1 will be ” ↑,↓”, ”↓,↑”, ”↑,↑” and ”↓,↓”. As array marked 0 only contain EPR data so bit 0 is recovered . If S1is sent then array marked 1 will contain EPR data. Complete en tangled based communication is possible. Next we shall discuss how t his communi- 3cation can be made secure. Eavesdropper’s problem is identical to what she encountere d in non- EPR based scheme. He/she can not extract the bit values from a sin gle copy of any sequences [11]. As our scheme is based on repetition he/s he can ex- tract bit values and can evade detection if proper security c riterion is not imposed. The security criterion is: bit by bit security. In this criterion, next bit will be sent after testing that the previous one has not be en touched by eavesdropper. This test needs two way communication to auth enticate the quantum channel [9]. Reverse communication can be done by th e same two arrangements. It is not necessary to send back the same arran gement what receiver has got. Note that, if security is not necessary, initial sharing of i nformation is also not needed. Bob can recover the message by correlating t he results of randomly incoming identical sequences. The concept of secr et sharing was first introduced by Vernam in classical cryptography [12]. I n our scheme secret sharing is required to achieve bit by bit security. In that sense security of each bit is based on Vernam principle as well as no cloning p rinciple[11]. From Ekert’s work it is known that EPR based cryptosystem can be pro- tected by Bell’s theorem[13]. But the problem is: violation or no-violation of Bell’s inequality is not necessarily mean a genuine test of e ntanglement. Us- ing unentangled states (BB-84 states[1]) Bell’s inequalit y can be tested[14]. This is a fake Bell’s inequality test. It is widely believed [ 15] that there is no way to know by the two distant observers whether the test is real or fake. If it be so, experimental falsification of hidden variables u nder Einstein’s lo- cality condition[6] is perhaps incomplete. In recent times such experiments have already been performed[15,16]. In these experiments v iolation of Bell’s inequality has been observed by space -like separated indep endent observers. The standard belief is that one observer can always cheat oth er distant ob- server about any outcome of the test [17]. That is, pseudo hid den variable takes the place of hypothetical local hidden variable. Next we shall discuss that cheating-free test is simply possible. That is, a genui ne falsification of local hidden variables is possible. Consider the following protocol. First Alice prepares pair s and send them 4to Bob. Bob keeps some EPR pairs and some single EPR particles . He sends back the partner EPR particles to Alice. Bob measures EPR cor relation on the EPR pairs in any parallel axes. Therefore, Bob can not b e secretly cheated by Alice. But Alice can be secretly cheated by Bob bec ause he can send back ”fake” states. Having received the states sent by B ob, Alice will tell Bob to send some of the partner particles. Bob sends acco rding to Alice’s demand. Now Alice measures the EPR correlation on the pairs. Note that if Bob sends ”fake” states in the first round he could not create e ntangled state in second feedback round. The reason is: in advance Bob does n ot know which partner particles will be sought, therefore he could n ot secretly cheat Alice. They share genuine entangled states (They can use the m for secure ideal quantum coin tossing which is also believed to be impos sible [18]). If both get perfect correlation they can go ahead for the inequa lity test with the remaining EPR pairs which they share. However they can cheat each other when they reveal results of measure- ments of different axes as demanded by Bell’s inequality. Aft er Alice’s dis- closer of results and angles of measurements Bob can easily r eveal ”fake” results and the corresponding ”fake” angles of measurement s with out go- ing through any measurements in order to show violation or no violation of Bell’s inequality to Alice. Same thing Alice can do if Bob rev eal results first. Cheating -free test can be executed by the following manner. After becoming sure they share genuine entangled states, Al ice will ask Bob to reveal the results and basis of measurements of half of his genuine particles. Bob now chooses some particles to test the EPR cor relation if he gets perfect correlation then he can trust others results and proceeds for inequality test. Alice’s is confirmed that the test is a genui ne test. Simi- larly Bob can be sure the validity of the test just by asking Al ice to reveal the results and basis of measurements on the remaining share d particles. Of course this time Bob will not reveal anything but only measur e according to the revealed data. However this is not a cryptographic proto col. To make it cryptosystem we need two different arrangements of entang led state as described earlier. Note that if two secret arrangements are used then they can not get perfectly correlated EPR data due to eavesdroppi ng even when they are honest. 5Two particle entangled state can not only be used for two part y protocol but also three party protocol involving Alice (sender), Bob and Sonu (re- ceivers). In three party protocol two receivers Bob and Sonu each of them will get one of the EPR particles of each arranged pairs belon ging to any of the two arrangements. Let us take an example. SBob 0={|φ/an}bracketri}ht1,|ψ/an}bracketri}ht1,|P/an}bracketri}ht1,|Q/an}bracketri}ht1,|X/an}bracketri}ht1,|Y/an}bracketri}ht1,......} SSonu 0={|X/an}bracketri}ht2,|φ/an}bracketri}ht2,|Y/an}bracketri}ht2,|ψ/an}bracketri}ht2,|Q/an}bracketri}ht2,|P/an}bracketri}ht2,....... }. From each pair the particle 1 and 2 are given to Bob and Sonu res pec- tively. The above two arrangements representing bit 0 are gi ven to Bob and Sonu. They can construct the arrangement and recover the bit value if they co operate each other. This is actually entangled based alte rnative message splitting [19,20] protocol. The protocol is described for two particle entangled state, although many particles entangled state can be used. What type of entangle d state should be chosen for a sequence of n particles ? For example, two hund reds three particle entangled states or three hundreds two particle en tangled states ? To answer this query let us see how many different ways the part icles can be arranged. If n is the number of particles and r is the number of particles in an entangled state, the number of distinguishable arrangemen ts are n!/r!. Given a single copy of any arrangement to an eavesdropper, her chan ce of correctly distinguishing the arrangement is r!/n!. Two particle enta ngled state is the best choice. For different entangled arrangements, the issu es like channel ca- pacity, entropy and statistical distinguishability can be further investigated. So far we did not consider noise in our discussion. In presenc e of noise both raw EPR and non EPR protocols will be insecure since eave sdropper can extract bit information without introducing any error. Noise is also threat to the security of raw conventional QKD protocols. Ma ny researchers have attacked the problem in different ways [see ref. 10]. To d ate, conven- tional QKD can not be proved secure in practical settings. Re cently noised based completely secure practical cryptosystem has been pr esented[10]. The method is applicable not only for alternative EPR and non- EP R protocols but also for classical protocol belonging to our coding deco ding procedure. If noise has a quantum origin[21], then classical system can be thought as a 6special case of quantum cryptosystem. In this way unificatio n of our classical and quantum cryptosystem can be understood. Beneficial side s of noise are yet to be explored. In this light, the possibility of noise ba sed (controlled) classical computer can be investigated. Simulation of quan tum computation on noise based classical computer can not be straight forwar dly ruled out if we accept noisy classical computing state is analogous to supperposition state of quantum mechanics. Author is greatly inspired by the earlier development of qua ntum cryp- tography. Author also acknowledges the computer facility o f Variable Energy Cyclotron Center, and library facility of Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics. References [1] D. Deustch Proc Roy. Soc, ,400A , (1985). [2] C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard in Proceedings of IEEE Inter Conf. On Comp, System and signal processing, Bangalore, India, 1984 .(IEEE, New York, 1984), pp-175-179. [3] S.Wiesner, Signact News ,15, 1983. [4] A. Ekert, Phy. Rev. Lett ,67, 661 (1991). [5] C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard. G. & N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett .68, 557 (1992). [6] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phy Rev 47, 777, (1935). [7] C. H. Bennett, et al,Phy. Rev. Lett ,70, 1895, (1993). [8] C.H. Bennett and D. Divincenzo, Nature ,404, 247, 2000. See P. 251 and L. 33. [9] A. Mitra. e-print, quant-ph/9812087 . [10] A. Mitra. e-print, quant-ph/9912074 [11] W. K. Wootters, & W. H. Zurek, Nature ,299, 802 (1982). [12] G. Vernam, J. Amer. Elect. Engrs ,45, 109-115 (1926). 7[13] J.S.Bell, Physics, 1 ,195, 1994 [14] C.Fuchs, N. Gisin, P. B. Griffth, C.S. Niu, A. Peres 56A, 1163(1997). [15] G. Weihs, T. Jannewin, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeili nger,Phy. Rev. Lett , 81, 5039 (1998). [16] D.S. Naik et alPhy. Rev .Lett 84, 4733 (2000). [17] S. J.D. Phoenix and P.D. Townsend, Contem. Phys 36(3), p. 165-195,(1995). [18] H.-K.Lo and H.F. Chau, Physica 120D, 177 (1998). Authors’ impossibility proof (their lemma 1. and 2.) of ideal coin tossing is based on the assumption that shared entanglement can not be proven genuine. [19] M. Hillery, V. Buzek, A. Berthiaume, Phy. Rev A ,59, 1829, (1999). [20] A. Karlsson, M. Koashi, N. Imoto, Phy. Rev A ,59, 162, (1999). [21] W.H.Zurek, October, Phy Today , p.36. (1991). 8

arXiv:physics/0007075 22 Jul 2000Optimization of Trading Physics Models of Markets Lester Ingber Lester Ingber Research POB 06440 Sears T ower,Chicago, IL 60606 and DRWInv estments LLC 311 S Wacker Dr ,Ste 900, Chicago, IL 60606 ingber@ingber.com, ingber@alumni.caltech.edu and Radu Paul Mondescu DRWInv estments LLC 311 S Wacker Dr ,Ste 900, Chicago, IL 60606 rmondescu@drwtrading.com ABSTRACT We describe an end-to-end real-time S&P futures trading system. Inner-shell stochastic nonlinear dynamic models are de veloped, and Canonical Momenta Indicators (CMI) are deri vedfrom a fitted Lagrangian used by outer-shell trading models dependent on these indicators. Recursive and adapti ve optimization using Adapti ve Simulated Annealing (ASA) is used for fitting parameters shared across these shells of dynamic and trading models. Ke ywords: Simulated Annealing; Statistical Mechanics; Trading Financial Markets ©2000 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Ho wever, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating ne wcollective works for resale or redistri- bution to servers or lists, or to reuse an ycopyrighted component of this w ork in other works must be obtained from the IEEE. This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Cop yright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical w ork. Cop yright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints in vokedb yeach author’ scopyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.Optimization of T rading - 2- I ngber & Mondescu 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Approaches Real-world problems are almost intractable analytically ,yet methods must be de vised to deal with this complexity to extract practical information in finite time. This is indeed true in the field of financial engineering, where time series of v arious financial instruments reflect nonequilibrium, highly non-linear , possibly e venchaotic [1] underlying processes. Afurther difficulty is the huge amount of data necessary to be processed. Under these circumstances, to de velop models and schemes for automated, profitable trading is a non-trivial task. In the context of this paper ,i ti simportant to stress that dealing with such comple xsystems invariably requires modeling of dynamics, modeling of actions on these dynamics, and algorithms to fit parameters in these models to real data. We hav eelected to use methods of mathematical physics for our models of the dynamics, artificial intelligence (AI) heuristics for our models of trading rules acting on indicators deri vedfrom our dynamics, and methods of sampling global optimization for fitting our parameters. T oo often there is confusion about ho wthese three elements are being used for a complete system. F or example, in the literature there often is discussion of neural net trading systems or genetic algorithm trading systems. However, neural net models (used for either or both models discussed here) also require some method of fitting their parameters, and genetic algorithms must ha ve some kind of cost function or process specified to sample a parameter space, etc. Some powerful methods ha ve emerged during years, appearing from at least tw odirections: One direction is based on inferring rules from past and current beha vior of market data leading to learning- based, inducti ve techniques, such as neural networks, or fuzzy logic. Another direction starts from the bottom-up, trying to build ph ysical and mathematical models based on different economic prototypes. In manyways, these tw odirections are complementary and a proper understanding of their main strengths and weaknesses should lead to synergetic effects beneficial to their common goals. Among approaches in the first direction, neural networks already ha ve won a prominent role in the financial community ,due to their ability to handle lar ge quantities of data, and to unco verand model nonlinear functional relationships between various combinations of fundamental indicators and price data [2,3].Optimization of T rading - 3- I ngber & Mondescu In the second direction we can include models based on non-equilibrium statistical mechanics [4] fractal geometry[5], turb ulence [6], spin glasses and random matrix theory[7], renormalization group [8], and gauge theory [9]. Although the very comple xnonlinear multi variate character of financial mark ets is recognized [10], these approaches seem to ha ve had a lesser impact on current quantitati ve finance practice, although it is becoming increasing clear that this direction can lead to practical trading strate gies and models. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, as well as to af ford a comparison with neural networks techniques, here we focus on presenting an ef fective trading system of S&P futures, anchored in the physical principles of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics applied to financial markets [4,11]. Starting with nonlinear ,multivariate, nonlinear stochastic differential equation descriptions of the price evolution of cash and futures indices, we b uild an algebraic cost function in terms of a Lagrangian. Then, a maximum likelihood fit to the data is performed using a global optimization algorithm, Adapti ve Simulated Annealing (ASA) [12]. As firmly rooted in field theoretical concepts, we deri ve market canonical momenta indicators, and we use these as technical signals in a recursi ve ASA optimization that tunes the outer-shell of trading rules. We donot employmetaphors for these ph ysical indicators, b ut rather deri ve them directly from models fit to data. The outline of the paper is as follows: Just belo ww ebriefly discuss the optimization method and momenta indicators. In the next three sections we establish the theoretical frame work supporting our model, the statistical mechanics approach, and the optimization method. In Section 5 we detail the trading system, and in Section 6 we describe our results. Our conclusions are presented in Section 7. 1.2. Optimization Large-scale, non-linear fits of stochastic nonlinear forms to financial data require methods rob ust enough across data sets. (Just one day ,tick data for regular trading hours could reach 10,000−30,000 data points.) Simple regression techniques e xhibit deficiencies with respect to obtaining reasonable fits. They too often get trapped in local minima typically found in nonlinear stochastic models of such data. ASA is aglobal optimization algorithm that has the advantage — with respect to other global optimization methods as genetic algorithms, combinatorial optimization, etc. — not only to be ef ficient in its importance-sampling search strate gy,but to ha ve the statistical guarantee of finding the bestOptimization of T rading - 4- I ngber & Mondescu optima [13,14]. This givessome confidence that a global minimum can be found, of course provided care is taken as necessary to tune the algorithm [15]. It should be noted that such po werful sampling algorithms also are often required by other models of comple xsystems than those we use here [16]. For example, neural network models ha ve taken advantage of ASA [17-19], as ha ve other financial and economic studies [20,21]. 1.3. Indicators In general, neural netw ork approaches attempt classification and identification of patterns, or try forecasting patterns and future e volution of financial time series. Statistical mechanical methods attempt to find dynamic indicators deri vedfrom physical models based on general principles of non-equilibrium stochastic processes that reflect certain market f actors. These indicators are used subsequently to generate trading signals or to try forecasting upcoming data. In this paper ,the main indicators are called Canonical Momenta Indicators (CMI), as the yfaithfully mathematically carry the significance of mark et momentum, where the “mass” is in versely proportional to the price v olatility (the “masses” are just the elements of the metric tensor in this Lagrangian formalism) and the “velocity” is the rate of price changes. 2. MODELS 2.1. Lange vin Equations for Random Walks The use of Brownian motion as a model for financial systems is generally attrib uted to Bachelier [22], though he incorrectly intuited that the noise scaled linearly instead of as the square root relative tothe random log-price v ariable. Einstein is generally credited with using the correct mathematical description in a larger physical context of statistical systems. However, sev eral studies imply that changing prices of man ymarkets do not follo warandom walk, that the ymay have long-term dependences in price correlations, and that the ymay not be efficient in quickly arbitraging ne w information [23-25]. Arandom walk for returns, rate of change of prices o verprices, is described by a Langevin equation with simple additi ve noiseη,typically representing the continual random influx of information into the market.Optimization of T rading - 5- I ngber & Mondescu ˙M=−f+gη, ˙M=dM/dt, <η(t)>η=0,<η(t),η(t′)>η=δ(t−t′), ( 1) wherefandgare constants, and Mis the logarithm of (scaled) price, M(t)=log( (P(t)/P(t−dt))). Price, although the most dramatic observ able, may not be the only appropriate dependent variable or order parameter for the system of mark ets [26]. This possibility has also been called the “semistrong form of the efficient market hypothesis” [23]. The generalization of this approach to include multi variate nonlinear nonequilibrium markets led to amodel of statistical mechanics of financial markets (SMFM) [11]. 2.2. Adapti ve Optimization of FxModels Our S&P model for the futures Fis dF=µdt+σFxdz, <dz>=0, <dz(t)dz(t′)>=dtδ(t−t′) We hav eused this model in se veral ways to fit the distrib ution’svolatility defined in terms of a scale and an exponent of the independent variable [4]. Amajor component of our trading system is the use of adapti ve optimization, essentially constantly retuning the parameters of our dynamic model each time ne wdata is encountered in our training, testing and real-time applications. The parameters {µ,σ}are constantly tuned using a quasi-local simple x code [27,28] included with the ASA (Adapti ve Simulated Annealing) code [12]. We hav etested several quasi-local codes for this kind of trading problem, versus using rob ust ASA adaptive optimizations, and the f aster quasi-local codes seem to work quite well for adapti ve updates after azeroth order parameters set is found by ASA [29,30].Optimization of T rading - 6- I ngber & Mondescu 3. STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF FINANCIAL MARKETS (SMFM) 3.1. Statistical Mechanics of Large Systems Aggregation problems in nonlinear nonequilibrium systems typically are “solv ed” (accommodated) by having ne wentities/languages de veloped at these disparate scales in order to efficiently pass information back and forth between scales. This is quite different from the nature of quasi-equilibrium quasi-linear systems, where thermodynamic or c ybernetic approaches are possible. These thermodynamic approaches typically fail for nonequilibrium nonlinear systems. Manysystems are aptly modeled in terms of multi variate differential rate-equations, known as Langevin equations [31], ˙MG=fG+ˆgG jηj,(G=1,...,Λ),(j=1,...,N), ˙MG=dMG/dt, <ηj(t)>η=0,<ηj(t),ηj′(t′)>η=δjj′δ(t−t′), ( 2) wherefGand ˆgG jare generally nonlinear functions of mesoscopic order parameters MG,jis a microscopic inde xindicating the source of fluctuations, and N≥Λ.The Einstein con vention of summing overrepeated indices is used. Vertical bars on an inde x, e.g., |j|, imply no sum is to be taken on repeated indices. Viaasomewhat length y, albeit instructi ve calculation, outlined in se veral other papers [11,32,33], involving an intermediate deri vation of a corresponding F okker-Planck or Schr ¨odinger-type equation for the conditional probability distrib utionP[M(t)|M(t0)], the Lange vin rate Eq. (2) is de veloped into the more useful probability distribution for MGat long-time macroscopic time e ventt=(u+1)θ+t0,in terms of a Stratonovich path-integral o vermesoscopic Gaussian conditional probabilities [34-38]. Here, macroscopic variables are defined as the long-time limit of the e volving mesoscopic system. The corresponding Schr ¨odinger-type equation is [36,37] ∂P/∂t=1 2(gGG′P),GG′−(gGP),G+V, gGG′=kTδjkˆgG jˆgG′ k,Optimization of T rading - 7- I ngber & Mondescu gG=fG+1 2δjkˆgG′ jˆgG k,G′, [...],G=∂[...]/∂MG.( 3) This is properly referred to as a F okker-Planck equation when V≡0. Note that although the partial differential Eq. (3) contains information re gardingMGas in the stochastic differential Eq. (2), all references to jhave been properly a veraged over. I.e., ˆgG jin Eq. (2) is an entity with parameters in both microscopic and mesoscopic spaces, b utMis a purely mesoscopic variable, and this is more clearly reflected in Eq. (3). The path integral representation is gi veni nterms of the “Feynman” Lagrangian L. P[Mt|Mt0]dM(t)=∫...∫DMexp(−S)δ[M(t0)=M0]δ[M(t)=Mt], S=k−1 Tmint t0∫dt′L, DM= u→∞limu+1 v=1Πg1/2 GΠ(2πθ)−1/2dMG v, L(˙MG,MG,t)=1 2(˙MG−hG)gGG′(˙MG′−hG′)+1 2hG ;G+R/6−V, hG=gG−1 2g−1/2(g1/2gGG′),G′, gGG′=(gGG′)−1, g=det(gGG′), hG ;G=hG ,G+ΓF GFhG=g−1/2(g1/2hG),G, ΓF JK≡gLF[JK,L]=gLF(gJL,K+gKL,J−gJK,L), R=gJLRJL=gJLgJKRFJKL, RFJKL=1 2(gFK,JL−gJK,FL−gFL,JK+gJL,FK)+gMN(ΓM FKΓN JL−ΓM FLΓN JK). ( 4)Optimization of T rading - 8- I ngber & Mondescu Mesoscopic v ariables ha ve been defined as MGin the Langevin and F okker-Planck representations, in terms of their de velopment from the microscopic system labeled by j.The Riemannian curv ature term R arises from nonlinear gGG′,which is a bona fide metric of this space [36]. Even if a stationary solution, i.e.,˙MG=0, is ultimately sought, a necessarily prior stochastic treatment of ˙MGterms givesrise to these Riemannian “corrections. ”Evenfor a constant metric, the term hG ;Gcontributes toLfor a nonlinear meanhG.Vmay include terms such as T′ΣJT′GMG,where the Lagrange multipliers JT′Gare constraints onMG,which are advantageously modeled as extrinsic sources in this representation; the ytoo may be time-dependent. Forour purposes, the abo ve Feynman Lagrangian defines a kernel of the short-time conditional probability distribution, in the curved space defined by the metric, in the limit of continuous time, whose iteration yields the solution of the previous partial differential equation Eq. (3). This differs from the Lagrangian which satisfies the requirement that the action is stationary to the first order in dt—the WKBJ approximation, b ut which does not include the first-order correction to the WKBJ approximation as does the Feynman Lagrangian. This latter Lagrangian differs from the Feynman Lagrangian, essentially by replacing R/6 above byR/12 [39]. In this sense, the WKBJ Lagrangian is more useful for some theoretical discussions [40]. Ho wever, the use of the Fe ynman Lagrangian coincides with the numerical method we use for long-time de velopment of our distributions using our P ATHINT code for other financial products, e.g., options [4]. This also is consistent with our use of relati vely short-time “forecast” of data points using the most probable path [41] dMG/dt=gG−g1/2(g−1/2gGG′),G′.( 5) Using the variational principle, JTGmay also be used to constrain MGto regions where the yare empirically bound. More complicated constraints may be af fixed toLusing methods of optimal control theory [42]. With respect to a steady state P,when it exists, the information gain in state Pis defined by ϒ[P]=∫...∫DM′Pln (P/P), DM′=DM/dMu+1.( 6) In the economics literature, there appears to be sentiment to define Eq. (2) by the Ito ˆ,rather than the Stratonovich prescription. It is true that Ito ˆintegrals have Martingale properties not possessed byOptimization of T rading - 9- I ngber & Mondescu Stratonovich integrals [43] which leads to risk-neural theorems for mark ets [44,45], butthe nature of the proper mathematics — actually a simple transformation between these tw odiscretizations — should ev entually be determined by proper aggre gation of relati vely microscopic models of mark ets. Itshould be noted that virtually all in vestigations of other ph ysical systems, which are also continuous time models of discrete processes, conclude that the Stratonovich interpretation coincides with reality ,when multiplicati ve noise with zero correlation time, modeled in terms of white noise ηj,i sproperly considered as the limit of real noise with finite correlation time [46]. The path integral succinctly demonstrates the difference between the two: The Ito ˆprescription corresponds to the prepoint discretization of L,wherein θ˙M(t)→Mv+1−MvandM(t)→Mv.The Stratonovich prescription corresponds to the midpoint discretization of L,whereinθ˙M(t)→Mv+1−MvandM(t)→1 2(Mv+1+Mv). Interms of the functions appearing in the F okker-Planck Eq. (3), the Ito ˆprescription of the prepoint discretized Lagrangian, LI,is relatively simple, albeit decepti vely so because of its nonstandard calculus. LI(˙MG,MG,t)=1 2(˙MG−gG)gGG′(˙MG′−gG′)−V.( 7) In the absence of a nonphenomenological microscopic theory ,the difference between a Ito ˆprescription and a Stratonovich prescription is simply a transformed drift [39]. There are se veral other advantages to Eq. (4) o verEq. (2). Extrema and most probable states of MG,<<MG>>,are simply deri vedb yavariational principle, similar to conditions sought in pre vious studies [47]. In the Stratonovich prescription, necessary ,albeit not sufficient, conditions are gi venby δGL=L,G−L,˙G:t=0, L,˙G:t=L,˙GG′˙MG′+L,˙G˙G′¨MG′.( 8) Forstationary states, ˙MG=0, and∂L/∂MG=0defines <<MG>>,where the bars identify stationary variables; in this case, the macroscopic v ariables are equal to their mesoscopic counterparts. Note that L isnotthe stationary solution of the system, e.g., to Eq. (3) with ∂P/∂t=0. However, insome cases [48], Lis a definite aid to finding such stationary states. Manytimes only properties of stationary states are examined, but here a temporal dependence is included. E.g., the ˙MGterms inLpermit steady states and their fluctuations to be in vestigated in a nonequilibrium conte xt. Note that Eq. (8) must be deri vedfrom the path integral, Eq. (4), which is at least one reason to justify its de velopment.Optimization of T rading - 10 - Ingber & Mondescu 3.2. Algebraic Complexity Yields Simple Intuiti ve Results It must be emphasized that the output of this formalism is not confined to comple xalgebraic forms or tables of numbers. Because Lpossesses a variational principle, sets of contour graphs, at dif ferent long-time epochs of the path-integral of Poverits variables at all intermediate times, gi ve a visually intuitive and accurate decision-aid to vie wthe dynamic e volution of the scenario. Forexample, this Lagrangian approach permits a quantitati ve assessment of concepts usually only loosely defined. “Momentum” =ΠG=∂L ∂(∂MG/∂t), “Mass”=gGG′=∂2L ∂(∂MG/∂t)∂(∂MG′/∂t), “Force”=∂L ∂MG, “F=ma ”:δL=0=∂L ∂MG−∂ ∂t∂L ∂(∂MG/∂t),( 9) whereMGare the variables and Lis the Lagrangian. These physical entities provide another form of intuitive,but quantitati vely precise, presentation of these analyses. Forexample, daily newspapers use some of this terminology to discuss the mo vement of security prices. In this paper ,theΠGserveas canonical momenta indicators (CMI) for these systems. 3.2.1. Deri vedCanonical Momenta Indicators (CMI) The extreme sensitivity of the CMI gi vesrapid feedback on changes in trends as well as the volatility of markets, and therefore are good indicators to use for trading rules [29]. A time-locked moving average provides manageable indicators for trading signals. This current project uses such CMI developed as a byproduct of the ASA fits described belo w. 3.3. Corr elations In this paper we report results of our one-v ariable trading model. However, iti sstraightforw ard to include multi-variable trading models in our approach, and we ha ve done this, for e xample, with coupled cash and futures S&P markets.Optimization of T rading - 11 - Ingber & Mondescu Correlations between variables are modeled e xplicitly in the Lagrangian as a parameter usually designated ρ.This section uses a simple tw o-factor model to de velop the correspondence between the correlation ρin the Lagrangian and that among the commonly written Wiener distribution dz. Consider coupled stochastic differential equations for futures Fand cashC: dF=fF(F,C)dt+ˆgF(F,C)σFdzF, dC=fC(F,C)dt+ˆgC(F,C)σCdzC, <dzi>=0,i={F,C}, <dzi(t)dzj(t′)>=dtδ(t−t′),i=j, <dzi(t)dzj(t′)>=ρdtδ(t−t′),i≠j, δ(t−t′)=  0,, 1,t≠t′, t=t′,(10) where <.> denotes expectations with respect to the multi variate distribution. These can be rewritten as Langevin equations (in the Ito ˆprepoint discretization) dF/dt=fF+ˆgFσF(γ+η1+sgnργ−η2), dC/dt=gC+ˆgCσC(sgnργ−η1+γ+η2), γ±=1 √2[1±(1−ρ2)1/2]1/2, ni=(dt)1/2pi,( 11) wherep1andp2are independent [0,1] Gaussian distributions. The equivalent short-time probability distribution, P,for the abo ve set of equations is P=g1/2(2πdt)−1/2exp(−Ldt), L=1 2M†gM,Optimization of T rading - 12 - Ingber & Mondescu M= dF/dt−fF dC/dt−fC , g=det(g). ( 12) g,the metric in {F,C}-space, is the in verse of the co variance matrix, g−1=  (ˆgFσF)2 ρˆgFˆgCσFσCρˆgFˆgCσFσC (ˆgCσC)2  .( 13) The CMI indicators are gi venb ythe formulas ΠF=(dF/dt−fF) (ˆgFσF)2(1−ρ2)−ρ(dC/dt−fC) ˆgFˆgCσFσC(1−ρ2), ΠC=(dC/dt−fC) (ˆgCσC)2(1−ρ2)−ρ(dF/dt−fF) ˆgCˆgFσCσF(1−ρ2).( 14) 3.4. ASA Outline The algorithm Adapti ve Simulated Annealing (ASA) fits short-time probability distributions to observed data, using a maximum likelihood technique on the Lagrangian. This algorithm has been developed to fit observed data to a theoretical cost function o veraD-dimensional parameter space [13], adapting for varying sensitivities of parameters during the fit. The ASA code can be obtained at no charge, via WWW from http://www.ingber.com/ or via FTP from ftp.ingber.com [12]. 3.4.1. General Description Simulated annealing (SA) was de veloped in 1983 to deal with highly nonlinear problems[49], as an extension of a Monte-Carlo importance-sampling technique de veloped in 1953 for chemical ph ysics problems. It helps to visualize the problems presented by such comple xsystems as a geographical terrain. Forexample, consider a mountain range, with tw o“parameters, ”e.g., along the North−South and East−West directions. We wish to find the lo west valleyi nthis terrain. SA approaches this problem similar to using a bouncing ball that can bounce o vermountains from v alleyt ovalley. Westart at a high “temperature, ”where the temperature is an SA parameter that mimics the effect of a fast moving particle in a hot object lik eahot molten metal, thereby permitting the ball to mak every high bounces and beingOptimization of T rading - 13 - Ingber & Mondescu able to bounce o verany mountain to access an yvalley, giv enenough bounces. As the temperature is made relati vely colder,the ball cannot bounce so high, and it also can settle to become trapped in relatively smaller ranges of valleys. We imagine that our mountain range is aptly described by a “cost function. ”Wedefine probability distributions of the tw odirectional parameters, called generating distributions since the ygenerate possible valleys or states we are to e xplore. W edefine another distrib ution, called the acceptance distrib ution, which depends on the difference of cost functions of the present generated v alleyw eare to explore and the last sa vedlowest valley. The acceptance distribution decides probabilistically whether to stay in a ne w lower valleyort obounce out of it. All the generating and acceptance distributions depend on temperatures. In 1984 [50], it was established that SA possessed a proof that, by carefully controlling the rates of cooling of temperatures, it could statistically find the best minimum, e.g., the lowest v alleyo four example abo ve.This was good news for people trying to solv ehard problems which could not be solv ed by other algorithms. The bad news was that the guarantee was only good if the ywere willing to run SA forever. In1987, a method of fast annealing (FA) was de veloped [51], which permitted lowering the temperature exponentially f aster,thereby statistically guaranteeing that the minimum could be found in some finite time. However, that time still could be quite long. Shortly thereafter ,Very Fast Simulated Reannealing (VFSR) was de veloped in 1987 [13], no wcalled Adapti ve Simulated Annealing (ASA), which is exponentially faster than FA. ASA has been applied to man yproblems by man ypeople in man ydisciplines [15,16,52]. The feedback of man yusers regularly scrutinizing the source code ensures its soundness as it becomes more flexible and powerful. 3.4.2. Mathematical Outline ASA considers a parameter αi kin dimension igenerated at annealing-time kwith the range αi k∈[Ai,Bi], ( 15) calculated with the random variable yi, αi k+1=αi k+yi(Bi−Ai),Optimization of T rading - 14 - Ingber & Mondescu yi∈[−1, 1].( 16) The generating function gT(y)isdefined, gT(y)=D i=1Π1 2(|yi|+Ti)ln(1+1/Ti)≡D i=1Πgi T(yi), ( 17) where the subscript ionTispecifies the parameter index, and the k-dependence in Ti(k)for the annealing schedule has been dropped for brevity .Its cumulati ve probability distribution is GT(y)=y1 −1∫...yD −1∫dy′1...dy′DgT(y′)≡D i=1ΠGi T(yi), Gi T(yi)=1 2+sgn (yi) 2ln(1+|yi|/Ti) ln(1+1/Ti).( 18) yiis generated from a uifrom the uniform distribution ui∈U[0, 1], yi=sgn (ui−1 2)Ti[(1+1/Ti)|2ui−1|−1] . (19) It is straightforward to calculate that for an annealing schedule for Ti Ti(k)=T0iexp(−cik1/D), ( 20) aglobal minima statistically can be obtained. I.e., ∞ k0Σgk≈∞ k0Σ[D i=1Π1 2|yi|ci]1 k=∞.( 21) Control can be taken o verci,such that Tfi=T0iexp(−mi)whenkf=expni, ci=miexp(−ni/D), ( 22) wheremiandnican be considered “free” parameters to help tune ASA for specific problems. ASA has o ver100 OPTIONS a vailable for tuning. Afew important ones were used in this project.Optimization of T rading - 15 - Ingber & Mondescu 3.4.3. Reannealing Wheneverdoing a multi-dimensional search in the course of a comple xnonlinear physical problem, inevitably one must deal with different changing sensitivities of the αiin the search. At an ygiv en annealing-time, the range o verwhich the relati vely insensiti ve parameters are being searched can be “stretched out” relati ve tothe ranges of the more sensiti ve parameters. This can be accomplished by periodically rescaling the annealing-time k,essentially reannealing, e very hundred or so acceptance- ev ents (or at some user-defined modulus of the number of accepted or generated states), in terms of the sensitivities sicalculated at the most current minimum value of the cost function, C, si=∂C/∂αi.( 23) In terms of the lar gestsi=smax,adefault rescaling is performed for each kiof each parameter dimension, whereby a ne windexk′iis calculated from each ki, ki→k′i, T′ik′=Tik(smax/si), k′i=((ln(Ti0/Tik′)/ci))D.( 24) Ti0is set to unity to begin the search, which is ample to span each parameter dimension. 3.4.4. Quenching Another adapti ve feature of ASA is its ability to perform quenching in a methodical f ashion. This is applied by noting that the temperature schedule abo ve can be redefined as Ti(ki)=T0iexp(−cikQi/D i), ci=miexp(−niQi/D), ( 25) in terms of the “quenching factor” Qi.The sampling proof fails if Qi>1as kΣD Π1/kQi/D= kΣ1/kQi<∞.( 26) This simple calculation shows ho wthe “curse of dimensionality” arises, and also gi vesapossible wayofliving with this disease. In ASA, the influence of large dimensions becomes clearly focussed onOptimization of T rading - 16 - Ingber & Mondescu the exponential of the power of kbeing 1/D,a sthe annealing required to properly sample the space becomes prohibiti vely slow. So, if resources cannot be committed to properly sample the space, then for some systems perhaps the next best procedure may be to turn on quenching, whereby Qican become on the order of the size of number of dimensions. The scale of the power of 1/ Dtemperature schedule used for the acceptance function can be altered in a similar f ashion. Ho wever, this does not affect the annealing proof of ASA, and so this may used without damaging the sampling property. 3.4.5. Avoiding Repeating Cost Functions Doing a recursi ve optimization is very CPU e xpensive,a sessentially the cross-product of parameter spaces among the various le vels of optimization is required. Therefore, we ha ve used an ASA OPTION for some of the parameters in the outer-shell trading model optimization of training sets, ASA_Q UEUE, which sets up a first-in first-out (FIFO) queue, of user-defined size Queue_Size to collect generated states. When a ne wstate is generated, its parameters are tested, within specified resolutions of a user-defined array Queue_Resolution[]. When parameters sets are repeated within this queue, the sa vedvalue of the cost function is returned without having to repeat the calculation. 3.4.6. Multiple Local Minima Our criteria for the global minimum of our cost function is minus the largest profit o veraselected training data set (or in some cases, this value divided by the maximum dra wdown). However, inmany cases this may not gi ve usthe best set of parameters to find profitable trading in test sets or in real-time trading. Other considerations such as the total number of trades de veloped by the global minimum v ersus other close local minima may be rele vant. For example, if the global minimum has just a fe wtrades, while some nearby local minima (in terms of the value of the cost function) ha ve manytrades and w as profitable in spite of our slippage f actors, then the scenario with more trades might be more statistically dependable to deli verprofits across testing and real-time data sets. Therefore, for the outer-shell global optimization of training sets, we ha ve used an ASA OPTION, MULTI_MIN, which sa vesauser-defined number of closest local minima within a user-defined resolutionOptimization of T rading - 17 - Ingber & Mondescu of the parameters. We then examine these results under se veral testing sets. 4. TRADING SYSTEM 4.1. Use of CMI As the CMI formalism carries the rele vant information re garding the prices dynamics, we ha ve used it as a signal generator for an automated trading system for S&P futures. Based on a previous w ork [30]applied to daily closing data, the o verall structure of the trading system consists in 2 layers, as follows: W efirst construct the “short-time” Lagrangian function in the Ito ˆ representation (with the notation introduced in Section 3.3) L(i|i−1)=1 2σ2F2x i−1 dFi dt−fF 2 (27) withithe post-point index, corresponding to the one factor price model dF=fFdt+σFxdz(t), ( 28) wherefFandσ>0 are taken to be constants, F(t)isthe S&P future price, and dzis the standard Gaussian noise with zero mean and unit standard de viation. W eperform a global, maximum likelihood fit to the whole set of price data using ASA. This procedure produces the optimization parameters {x,fF} that are used to generate the CMI. One computational approach was to fix the diffusion multiplier σto 1 during training for con venience, but used as free parameters in the adapti ve testing and real-time fits. Another approach was to fix the scale of the volatility ,using an impro vedmodel, dF=fFdt+σ F <F> x dz(t), ( 29) whereσnowi scalculated as the standard deviation of the price increments ΔF/dt1/2,and <F>isjust the average of the prices. As already remarked, to enhance the CMI sensitivity and response time to local variations (across a certain windo wsize) in the distribution of price increments, the momenta are generated applying an adaptive procedure, i.e., after each ne wdata reading another set of {fF,σ}parameters are calculated for the last windo wo fdata, with the e xponentx—acontextual indicator of the noise statistics — fixed to theOptimization of T rading - 18 - Ingber & Mondescu value obtained from the global fit. The CMI computed in this manner are fed into the outer shell of the trading system, where an AI- type optimization of the trading rules is e xecuted, using ASA once again. The trading rules are a collection of logical conditions among the CMI, prices and optimization parameters that could be windo wsizes, time resolutions, or trigger thresholds. Based on the relationships between CMI and optimization parameters, a trading decision is made. The cost function in the outer shell is either the o verall equity or the risk-adjusted profit (essentially the return). The inner and outer shell optimizations are coupled through some of the optimization parameters (e.g., time resolution of the data, windo wsizes), which justifies the recursi ve nature of the optimization. Next, we describe in more details the concrete implementation of this system. 4.2. Data Processing The CMI formalism is general and by construction permits us to treat multi variate coupled mark ets. In certain conditions (e.g., shorter time scales of data), and also due to superior scalability across dif ferent markets, it is desirable to ha ve a trading system for a single instrument, in our case the S&P futures contracts that are traded electronically on Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). The focus of our system wasintra-day trading, at time scales of data used in generating the b uy/sell signals from 10 to 60 secs. In particular ,w ehere give some results obtained when using data having a time resolution Δtof 55 secs (the time between consecuti ve data elements is 55 secs). This particular choice of time resolution reflects the set of optimization parameters that ha ve been applied in actual trading. It is important to remark that a data point in our model does not necessarily mean an actual tick datum. F or some trading time scales and for noise reduction purposes, data is pre-processed into sampling bins of length Δtusing either a standard a veraging procedure or spectral filtering (e.g., w av elets, Fourier) of the tick data. Alternatively,the data can be defined in block bins that contain disjoint sets of av eraged tick data, or in o verlapping bins of widths Δtthat update at e veryΔt′<Δt,such that an ef fective resolution Δt′shorter than the width of the sampling bin is obtained. We present here work in which we have used disjoint block bins and a standard a verage of the tick data with time stamps falling within the bin width.Optimization of T rading - 19 - Ingber & Mondescu In Figs. 1 and 2 we present examples of S&P futures data sampled with 55 secs resolution. We remark that there are se veral time scales — from mins to one hour — at which an automated trading system might extract profits. Fig. 2 illustrates the sustained short trading re gion of 1.5 hours and se veral shorter long and short trading regions of about 10-20 mins. Fig. 1 illustrates that the profitable re gions are prominent e venfor data representing a relati vely flat market period. I.e., June 20 shows an uptrend re gion of about 1 hour 20 mins and se veral short and long trading domains between 10 mins and 20 mins. In both situations, there are a larger number of opportunities at time resolutions smaller than 5 mins. The time scale at which we sample the data for trading is itself a parameter that is extracted from the optimization of the trading rules and of the Lagrangian cost function Eq. (27). This is one of the coupling parameters between the inner -and the outer-shell optimizations. 4.3. Inner -Shell Optimization Acycle of optimization runs has three parts, training and testing, and finally real-time use — a variant of testing. Training consists in choosing a data set and performing the recursi ve optimization, which produces optimization parameters for trading. In our case there are six parameters: the time resolution Δtof price data, the length of windo wWused in the local fitting procedures and in computation of moving a verages of trading signals, the drift fF,volatility coef ficientσand exponentx from Eq. (28), and a multiplicati ve factorMnecessary for the trading rules module, as discussed belo w. The optimization parameters computed from the training set are applied then to v arious test sets and final profit/loss analysis are produced. Based on these, the best set of optimization parameters are chosen to be applied in real-time trading runs. We remark once again that a single training data set could support more than one profitable sets of parameters and can be a function of the trader’ sinterest and the specific market dynamics targeted (e.g., short/long time scales). The optimization parameters corresponding to the global minimum in the training session may not necessarily represent the parameters that led to rob ust profits across real-time data. The training optimization occurs in tw ointer-related stages. An inner-shell maximum lik elihood optimization o verall training data is performed. The cost function that is fitted to data is the ef fective action constructed from the Lagrangian Eq. (27) including the pre-factors coming from the measure element in the expression of the short-time probability distribution Eq. (12). This is based on the f act [39]Optimization of T rading - 20 - Ingber & Mondescu that in the context of Gaussian multiplicati ve stochastic noise, the macroscopic transition probability P(F,t|F′,t′)t ostart with the price F′att′and reach the price Fattis determined by the short-time Lagrangian Eq. (27), P(F,t|F′,t′)=1 (2πσ2F2x i−1dti)1/2exp −N i=1ΣL(i|i−1)dti ,( 30) withdti=ti−ti−1.Recall that the main assumption of our model is that price increments (or the logarithm of price ratios, depending on which variables are considered independent) could be described by a system of coupled stochastic, non-linear equations as in Eq. (10). These equations are decepti vely simple in structure, yet depending on the functional form of the drift coefficients and the multiplicati ve noise, the ycould describe a variety of interactions between financial instruments in various mark et conditions (e.g., constant elasticity of v ariance model [53], stochastic volatility models, etc.). In particular ,this type of models include the case of Black-Scholes price dynamics ( x=1). In the system presented here, we ha ve applied the model from Eq. (28). The fitted parameters were the drift coef ficientfFand the exponentx.Inthe case of a coupled futures and cash system, besides the corresponding v alues offFandxfor the cash index, another parameter ,the correlation coef ficientρas introduced in Eq. (10), must be considered. 4.4. Trading Rules (Outer-Shell) Recursi ve Optimization In the second part of the training optimization, we calculate the CMI and e xecute trades as required by a selected set of trading rules based on CMI values, price data or combinations of both indicators. Recall that three external shell optimization parameters are defined: the time resolution Δtof the data expressed as the time interv al between consecuti ve data points, the windo wlengthW(in number of time epochs or data points) used in the adapti ve calculation of CMI, and a numerical coef ficientMthat scales the momentum uncertainty discussed belo w. At each moment a local refit of fFandσoverdata in the local windo wWis executed, mo ving the windowMacross the training data set and using the zeroth order optimization parameters fFandx resulting from the inner-shell optimization as a first guess. It was found that a faster quasi-local code is sufficient for computational purposes for these adapti ve updates. In more complicated models, ASA can be successfully applied recursi vely,although in real-time trading the response time of the system is aOptimization of T rading - 21 - Ingber & Mondescu major factor that requires attention. All expressions that follo wcan be generalized to coupled systems in the manner described in Section 3. Here we use the one factor nonlinear model gi venb yEq. (28). At each time epoch we calculate the following momentum related quantities: ΠF=1 σ2F2x dF dt−fF , ΠF 0=−fF σ2F2x, ΔΠF=<(ΠF−<ΠF>)2>1/2=1 σFx√ dt,( 31) where we ha ve used <ΠF>=0a simplied by Eqs. (28) and (27). In the pre vious expressions, ΠFis the CMI,ΠF 0is the neutral line or the momentum of a zero change in prices, and ΔΠFis the uncertainty of momentum. The last quantity reflects the Heisenber gprinciple, as deri vedfrom Eq. (28) by calculating ΔF≡<(dF−<dF>)2>1/2=σFx√ dt, ΔΠFΔF≥1, ( 32) where all e xpectations are in terms of the exact noise distribution, and the calculation implies the Ito ˆ approximation (equi valent to considering non-anticipati ve functions). V arious moving a verages of these momentum signals are also constructed. Other dynamical quantities, as the Hamiltonian, could be used as well. (By analogy to the ener gy concept, we found that the Hamiltonian carries information re garding the overall trend of the market, giving another useful measure of price volatility.) Regarding the practical implementation of the previous relations for trading, some comments are necessary .Interms of discretization, if the CMI are calculated at epoch i,thendFi=Fi−Fi−1, dti=ti−ti−1=Δt,and all prefactors are computed at moment i−1bythe Itoˆprescription (e.g., σFx=σFx i−1). Themomentum uncertainty band ΔΠFcan be calculated from the discretized theoretical value Eq. (31), or by computing the estimator of the standard deviation from the actual time series of ΠF. There are also tw oways of calculating a verages overCMI values: One w ay is to use the set of local optimization parameters {fF,σ}obtained from the local fit procedure in the current windo wWfor all CMI data within that windo w(local-model a verage). The second w ay is to calculate each CMI in theOptimization of T rading - 22 - Ingber & Mondescu current local windo wWwith another set {fF,σ}obtained from a previous local fit windo wmeasured from the CMI data backw ardsWpoints (multiple-models a veraged, as each CMI corresponds to a different model in terms of the fitting parameters {fF,σ}). The last observation is that the neutral line divides all CMI in tw oclasses: long signals, when ΠF>ΠF 0,a sany CMI satisfying this condition indicates a positi ve price change, and short signals when ΠF<ΠF 0,which reflects a ne gative price change. After the CMI are calculated, based on their meaning as statistical momentum indicators, trades are executed following a relati vely simple model: Entry in and exit from a long (short) trade points are defined as points where the v alue of CMIs is greater (smaller) than a certain fraction of the uncertainty bandMΔΠF(−MΔΠF), where Mis the multiplicati ve factor mentioned in the be ginning of this subsection. This is a choice of a symmetric trading rule, as Mis the same for long and short trading signals, which is suitable for volatile mark ets without a sustained trend, yet without diminishing too severely profits in a strictly bull or bear region. Inside the momentum uncertainty band, one could define rules to stay in a previously open trade, or exit immediately ,because by its nature the momentum uncertainty band implies that the probabilities of price movements in either direction (up or down) are balanced. From another perspecti ve,this type of trading rule exploits the relaxation time of a strong market advance or decline, until a trend re versal occurs or it becomes more probable. Other sets of trading rules are certainly possible, by utilizing not only the current v alues of the momenta indicators, but also their local-model or multiple-models a verages. A trading rule based on the maximum distance between the current CMI data ΠF iand the neutral line ΠF 0shows faster response to markets e volution and may be more suitable to automatic trading in certain conditions. Stepping through the trading decisions each trading day of the training set determined the profit/loss of the training set as a single value of the outer-sell cost function. As ASA importance- sampled the outer -shell parameter space {Δt,W,M},these parameters are fed into the inner shell, and a newinner-shell recursi ve optimization cycle be gins. The final values for the optimization parameters in the training set are fix ed when the largest net profit (calculated from the total equity by subtracting the transactions costs defined by the slippage factor) is realized. In practice, we ha ve collected optimization parameters from multiple local minima that are near the global minimum (the outer-shell cost function isOptimization of T rading - 23 - Ingber & Mondescu defined with the sign re versed) of the training set. The values of the optimization parameters {Δt,W,M,fF,σ,x}resulting from a training cycle are then applied to out-of-sample test sets. During the test run, the drift coef ficientfFand the v olatility coefficient σare refitted adapti vely as described pre viously.All other parameters are fix ed. Wehav e mentioned that the optimization parameters corresponding to the highest profit in the training set may not be the suf ficiently robust across test sets. Then, for all test sets, we ha ve tested optimization parameters related to the multiple minima (i.e., the global maximum profit, the second best profit, etc.) resulting from the training set. We performed a bootstrap-type re versal of the training-test sets (repeating the training runs procedures using one of the test sets, including the pre vious training set in the ne wbatch of test sets), followed by a selection of the best parameters across all data sets. This is necessary to increase the chances of successful trading sessions in real-time. 5. RESUL TS 5.1. Alter native Algorithms In the pre vious sections we noted that there are different combinations of methods of processing data, methods of computing the CMI and v arious sets of trading rules that need to be tested — at least in a sampling manner — before launching trading runs in real-time: 1. Datacan be preprocessed in block or o verlapping bins, or forecasted data deri vedfrom the most probable transition path [41] could be used as in one of our most recent models. 2. Exponential smoothing, w av elets or F ourier decomposition can be applied for statistical processing. W epresently favorexponential moving a verages. 3. TheCMI can be calculated using a veraged data or directly with tick data, although the optimization parameters were fitted from preprocessed (a veraged) price data. 4. Thetrading rules can be based on current signals (no a verage is performed o verthe signal themselves), on various a verages of the CMI trading signals, on various combination of CMI data (momenta, neutral line, uncertainty band), on symmetric or asymmetric trading rules, or on mix ed price- CMI trading signals.Optimization of T rading - 24 - Ingber & Mondescu 5. Different models (one and tw o-factors coupled) can be applied to the same mark et instrument, e.g., to define complementary indicators. The selection process evidently must consider man yspecific economic factors (e.g., liquidity of a givenmarket), besides all other physical, mathematical and technical considerations. In the w ork presented here, as we tested our system and using pre vious experience, we focused to ward S&P500 futures electronic trading, using block processed data, and symmetric, local-model and multiple-models trading rules. In Table 1 we sho wresults obtained for se veral training and testing sets in the mentioned context. 5.2. Trading System Design The design of a successful electronic trading system is comple xa si tm ust incorporate se veral aspects of a trader’ sactions that sometimes are difficult to translate into computer code. Three important features that must be implemented are factoring in the transactions costs, devising mone ymanagement techniques, and coping with e xecution deficiencies. Generally ,most trading costs can be included under the “slippage f actor,” although this could easily lead to poor estimates. Giventhat the margin of profits from e xploiting market inefficiencies are thin, a high slippage factor can easily result in a non-profitable trading system. In our situation, for testing purposes we used a $35 slippage factor per b uy & sell order ,avalue we belie ve israther high for an electronic trading environment, although it represents less than three ticks of a mini-S&P futures contract. (The mini-S&P is the S&P futures contract that is traded electronically on CME.) This higher value w as chosen to protect ourselves against the bid-ask spread, as our trigger price (at what price the CMI w as generated) and e xecution price (at what price a trade signaled by a CMI was e xecuted) were taken to be equal to the trading price. (Wehav echanged this aspect of our algorithm in later models.) The slippage is also strongly influenced by the time resolution of the data. Although the slippage is linked to bid-ask spreads and mark ets volatility in various formulas[54], the best estimate is obtained from experience and actual trading. Moneymanagement was introduced in terms of a trailing stop condition that is a function of the price volatility,and a stop-loss threshold that we fixed by e xperiment to a multiple of the mini-S&P contract value ($200). It is tempting to tighten the trailing stop or to w ork with a small stop-loss v alue,Optimization of T rading - 25 - Ingber & Mondescu yet we found — as otherwise e xpected — that higher losses occurred as the signals generated by our stochastic model were bypassed. Regarding the e xecution process, we ha ve toaccount for the response of the system to v arious execution conditions in the interaction with the electronic exchange: partial fills, rejections, uptick rule (for equity trading), etc. Except for some special conditions, all these steps must be automated. 5.3. Some Explicit Results Typical CMI data in Figs. 3 and 4 (obtained from real-time trading after a full c ycle of training- testing was performed) are related to the price data in Figs. 1 and 2. We hav eplotted the fastest (55 secs apart) CMI v aluesΠF,the neutral line ΠF 0and the uncertainty band ΔΠF.All CMI data were produced using the optimization parameters set {55 secs,88 epochs, 0. 15}of the second-best net profit obtained with the training set “4D ESM0 0321-0324” (Table 1). Although the CMIs e xhibit an inherently ragged nature and oscillate around a zero mean v alue within the uncertainty band — the width of which is decreasing with increasing price v olatility,a sthe uncertainty principle would also indicate — time scales at which the CMI a verage or some persistence time are not balanced about the neutral line. These characteristics, which we try to e xploit in our system, are better depicted in Figs. 5 and 6. One set of trading signals, the local-model a verage of the neutral line < ΠF 0>and the uncertainty band multiplied by the optimization f actorM=0. 15,and centered around the theoretical zero mean of the CMI, is represented v ersus time. Note entry points in a short trading position (< ΠF 0>>MΔΠF)at around 10:41 (Fig. 5 in conjunction with S&P data in Fig. 1) with a possible exit at 11:21 (or later), and a first long entry (< ΠF 0><−MΔΠF)a t12:15. After 14:35, a stay long region appears (< ΠF 0><0), which indicates correctly the price mo vement in Fig.1. In Fig. 6 corresponding to June 22 price data from Fig. 2, a first long signal is generated at around 12:56 and a first short signal is generated at 14:16 that reflects the long downtrend region in Fig. 2. Due to the averaging process, a time lag is introduced, reflected by the long signal at 12:56 in Fig. 4, related to apast upward trend seen in Fig. 2; yet the neutral line relax es rather rapidly (gi venthe 55 sec time resolution and the windo wo f88≈1.5 hour) to ward the uncertainty band. Ajudicious choice of trading rules, or a voiding standard a veraging methods, helps in controlling this lag problem.Optimization of T rading - 26 - Ingber & Mondescu In Tables 1 and 2 we sho wsome results obtained for se veral training and testing sets following the procedures described at the end of the previous section. In both tables, under the heading “Training” or “Testing Set” we specify the data set used (e.g., “4D ESM0 0321-0324” represents four days of data from the mini-S&P futures contract that expired in June). The type of trading rules used is identified by “LOCAL MODEL” or “MULTIPLE MODELS” tags. These tags refer to ho ww ecalculate the a verages of the trading signals: either by using a single pair of optimization parameters {fF,σ}for all CMI data within the current adapti ve fitwindow, oradifferent pair {fF,σ}for each CMI data. In the “Statistics” column we report the net (subtracting the slippage) profit or loss (in parenthesis) across the whole data set, the total number of trades (“trades”), the number of days with positi ve balance (“days +”), and the percentage of winning trades (“winners”). The “P arameters” are the optimization parameters resulting from the first three best profit maxima of each listed training set. The parameters are listed in the order {Δt,W,M},with the data time resolution Δtmeasured in seconds, the length of the local fit windo wW measured in time epochs, and Mthe numerical coefficient of the momentum uncertainty band ΔΠF. Recall that the trading rules presented are symmetric (the long and short entry/e xit signals are controlled by the same Mfactor), and we apply a stay-long condition if the neutral-line is belo wthe av erage momentum < ΠF>=0and stay-short if ΠF 0>0.The driftfFand volatility coef ficientσare refitted adapti vely and the e xponentxis fixed to the value obtained in the training set. Typical values are fF∈±[0. 003: 0. 05], x∈±[0. 01: 0. 03]. During the local fit, due to the shorter time scale in volved, the drift may increase by a factor of ten, and σ∈[0. 01: 1. 2]. Comparing the data in the training and testing tables, we note that the most rob ust optimization factors — in terms of maximum cumulati ve profit resulted for all test sets — do not correspond to the maximum profit in the training sets: F or the local-model rules, the optimum parameters are {55, 88, 0. 15 },and for the multiple models rules the optimum set is {45, 72, 0. 2 },both realized by the training set “4D ESM0 0321-0324.” Other observ ations are that, for the data presented here, the multiple-models a verages trading rules consistently performed better and are more rob ust than the local-model a verages trading rules. The number of trades is similar ,varying between 15 and 35 (eliminating cumulati ve values smaller than 10 trades), and the time scale of the local fit is rather long in the 30 mins to 1.5 hour range. In the current set-up, this extended time scale implies that is advisable to deplo ythis system as a trader-assisted tool.Optimization of T rading - 27 - Ingber & Mondescu An important factor is the a verage length of the trades. Forthe type of rules presented in this w ork, this length is of se veral minutes, up to one hour ,a sthe time scale of the local fit windo wmentioned abo ve suggested. Related to the length of a trade is the length of a winning long/short trade in comparison to a losing long/short trade. Our e xperience indicates that a ratio of 2:1 between the length of a winning trade and the length of a losing trade is desirable for a reliable trading system. Here, using the local-model trading rules seems to offer an advantage, although this is not as clear as one would expect. Finally,the training sets data (Table 1) sho wthat the percentage of winners is mark edly higher in the case of multiple-models a verage than local-a verage trading rules. In the testing sets (T able 2) the situation is almost re versed, albeit the o verall profits (losses) are higher (smaller) in the multiple-model case. Apparently ,the multiple-model trading rules can stay in winning trades longer to increase profits, relative tolosses incurred with these rules in losing trades. (In the testing sets, this correlates with the higher number of trades e xecuted using local-model trading rules.) 6. CONCLUSIONS 6.1. Main Features The main stages of building and testing this system were: 1. Wedev eloped a multi variate, nonlinear statistical mechanics model of S&P futures and cash markets, based on a system of coupled stochastic differential equations. 2. Weconstructed a two-stage, recursi ve optimization procedure using methods of ASA global optimization: An inner-shell extracts the characteristics of the stochastic price distrib ution and an outer - shell generates the technical indicators and optimize the trading rules. 3. Wetrained the system on dif ferent sets of data and retained the multiple minima generated (corresponding to the global maximum net profit realized and the neighboring profit maxima). 4. Wetested the system on out-of-sample data sets, searching for most robust optimization parameters to be used in real-time trading. Robustness was estimated by the cumulati ve profit/loss across diverse test sets, and by testing the system against a bootstrap-type re versal of training-testing sets in the optimization cycle.Optimization of T rading - 28 - Ingber & Mondescu Modeling the market as a dynamical physical system mak es possible a direct representation of empirical notions as mark et momentum in terms of CMI deri vednaturally from our theoretical model. We hav eshown that other physical concepts as the uncertainty principle may lead to quantitati ve signals (the momentum uncertainty band ΔΠF)that captures other aspects of mark et dynamics and which can be used in real-time trading. 6.2. Summary We hav epresented a description of a trading system composed of an outer -shell trading-rule model and an inner -shell nonlinear stochastic dynamic model of the market of interest, S&P500. The inner -shell is developed adhering to the mathematical physics of multi variate nonlinear statistical mechanics, from which we de velop indicators for the trading-rule model, i.e., canonical momenta indicators (CMI). We have found that keeping our model f aithful to the underlying mathematical physics is not a limiting constraint on profitability of our system; quite the contrary. An important result of our w ork is that the ideas for our algorithms, and the proper use of the mathematical physics f aithful to these algorithms, must be supplemented by man ypractical considerations en route to de veloping a profitable trading system. Forexample, since there is a subset of parameters, e.g., time resolution parameters, shared by the inner -and outer-shell models, recursi ve optimization is used to get the best fits to data, as well as de veloping multiple minima with approximate similar profitability .The multiple minima often ha ve additional features requiring consideration for real- time trading, e.g., more trades per day increasing robustness of the system, etc. The nonlinear stochastic nature of our data required a robust global optimization algorithm. The output of these parameters from these training sets were then applied to testing sets on out-of-sample data. The best models and parameters were then used in real-time by traders, further testing the models as a precursor to e ventual deployment in automated electronic trading. We hav eused methods of statistical mechanics to de velop our inner -shell model of mark et dynamics and a heuristic AI type model for our outer -shell trading-rule model, but there are man yother candidate (quasi-)global algorithms for de veloping a cost function that can be used to fit parameters to data, e.g., neural nets, fractal scaling models, etc. To perform our fits to data, we selected an algorithm, Adaptive Simulated Annealing (ASA), that we were familiar with, but there are se veral other candidateOptimization of T rading - 29 - Ingber & Mondescu algorithms that likely would suffice, e.g., genetic algorithms, tab usearch, etc. We hav eshown that a minimal set of trading signals (the CMI, the neutral line representing the momentum of the trend of a gi ventime windo wo fdata, and the momentum uncertainty band) can generate a rich and rob ust set of trading rules that identify profitable domains of trading at various time scales. This is a confirmation of the hypothesis that markets are not ef ficient, as noted in other studies [11,30,55]. 6.3. Futur eDirections Although this paper focused on trading of a single instrument, the futures S&P 500, the code we have dev eloped can accommodate trading on multiple mark ets. For example, in the case of tick- resolution coupled cash and futures mark ets, which was previously prototyped for inter -day trading [29,30], the utility of CMI stems from three directions: (a) The inner -shell fitting process requires a global optimization of all parameters in both futures and cash markets. (b) The CMI for futures contain, by our Lagrangian construction, the coupling with the cash mark et through the off-diagonal correlation terms of the metric tensor .The correlation between the futures and cash markets is explicitly present in all futures variables. (c) The CMI of both markets can be used as complimentary technical indicators for trading in futures market. Several near term future directions are of interest: orienting the system to ward shorter trading time scales (10-30 secs) more suitable for electronic trading, introducing fast response “a veraging” methods and time scale identifiers (e xponential smoothing, w av elets decomposition), identifying mini-crashes points using renormalization group techniques, in vestigating the use of CMI in pattern-recognition based trading rules, and exploring the use of forecasted data e valuated from most probable transition path formalism. Our efforts indicate the in valuable utility of a joint approach (AI-based and quantitati ve)in developing automated trading systems.Optimization of T rading - 30 - Ingber & Mondescu 6.4. Standard Disclaimer We must emphasize that there are no claims that all results are positi ve orthat the present system is asafe source of riskless profits. There as man yneg ative results as positi ve,and a lot of work is necessary to extract meaningful information. Our purpose here is to describe an approach to de veloping an electronic trading system complementary to those based on neural-networks type technical analysis and pattern recognition methods. The system discussed in this paper is rooted in the physical principles of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, and we ha ve shown that there are conditions under which such a model can be successful. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Donald Wilson for his financial support. We thank K.S. Balasubramaniam and Colleen Chen for their programming support and participation in formulating parts of our trading system. Data wasextracted from the DR WReuters feed.Optimization of T rading - 31 - Ingber & Mondescu REFERENCES [1] E.Peters,Chaos and Order in the Capital Markets ,Wiley&Sons, NewYork,NY,1991. [2] E.M. Azoff,Neural Network T ime Series F orecasting of Financial Mark ets,Wiley&Sons, New York,NY,1994. [3] E.Gately,Neural Networks for financial Forecasting ,Wiley&Sons, NewYork,NY,1996. [4] L.Ingber,‘‘High-resolution path-integral de velopment of financial options, ’’Physica A ,vol. 283, pp. 529-558, 2000. [5] B.B. Mandelbrot, Fr actals and Scaling in Finance ,Springer-Verlag, Ne wYork, NY,1997. [6] R.N. Mantegna and H.E. Stanle y, ‘‘Turbulence and financial mark ets,’’Nature,vol. 383, pp. 587-588, 1996. [7] L. Laloux, P .Cizeau, J.-P .Bouchaud, and M. Potters, ‘‘Noise dressing of financial correlation matrices,’’Phys. Rev. Lett.,vol. 83, pp. 1467-1470, 1999. [8] A. Johansen, D. Sornette, and O. Ledoit, Predicting financial crashes using discrete scale invariance, http://xxx.lanl.gov/cond-mat, 2000. [9] K. Ilinskyand G. Kalinin, Black-Scholes equation from g auge theory of arbitrage, http://xxx.lanl.gov/hep-th/9712034, 1997. [10] J.C. Hull,Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 4th Edition ,Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle Ri ver, NJ, 2000. [11] L.Ingber,‘‘Statistical mechanics of nonlinear nonequilibrium financial mark ets,’’Math. Modelling , vol. 5, pp. 343-361, 1984. [12] L.Ingber,‘‘Adaptive Simulated Annealing (ASA), ’’ Global optimization C-code, Caltech Alumni Association, Pasadena, CA, 1993. [13] L. Ingber,‘‘Very fast simulated re-annealing, ’’Mathl. Comput. Modelling ,vol. 12, pp. 967-973, 1989. [14] L.Ingber and B. Rosen, ‘‘Genetic algorithms and very fast simulated reannealing: A comparison, ’’ Oper.Res. Management Sci.,vol. 33, pp. 523, 1993.Optimization of T rading - 32 - Ingber & Mondescu [15] L.Ingber,‘‘Adaptive simulated annealing (ASA): Lessons learned, ’’Control and Cybernetics ,vol. 25, pp. 33-54, 1996. [16] L.Ingber,‘‘Simulated annealing: Practice v ersus theory ,’’Mathl. Comput. Modelling ,vol. 18, pp. 29-57, 1993. [17] G. Indiveri, G. Nateri, L. Raffo, and D. Caviglia, ‘ ‘A neural network architecture for defect detection through magnetic inspection, ’’ Report, Uni versity of Geno va,Genova,Italy,1993. [18] B.Cohen, Training synaptic delays in a recurrent neural network, M.S. Thesis, T el-AvivUniversity, Tel-Aviv, Israel, 1994. [19] R.A. Cozzio-Bu ¨eler,‘‘The design of neural networks using a priori kno wledge,’’ Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Fed. Inst. Tech., Zurich, Switzerland, 1995. [20] D.G. Mayer,P.M. Pepper ,J.A. Belward, K. Burrage, and A.J. Swain, ‘‘Simulated annealing - A robust optimization technique for fitting nonlinear regression models, ’’ inProceedings ’Modelling , Simulation and Optimization’ Confer ence,International Association of Science and T echnology for Development (IASTED), 6-9 May 1996 Gold Coast ,1996. [21] S.Sakata and H. White, ‘ ‘High breakdown point conditional dispersion estimation with application to S&P 500 daily returns volatility ,’’Econometrica ,vol. 66, pp. 529-567, 1998. [22] L. Bachelier ,‘‘The´orie de la Spe ´culation,’’Annales de l’Ecole Normale Supe ´rieure,vol. 17, pp. 21-86, 1900. [23] M. C. Jensen, ‘‘Some anomalous evidence re garding market ef ficiency, aneditorial introduction, ’’J. Finan. Econ. ,vol. 6, pp. 95-101, 1978. [24] B.B. Mandelbrot, ‘‘When can price be arbitraged ef ficiently? A limit to the validity of the random walk and martingale models, ’’Rev. Econ. Statist. ,vol. 53, pp. 225-236, 1971. [25] S.J. Taylor,‘‘Tests of the random walk hypothesis against a price-trend h ypothesis, ’’J. Finan. Quant. Anal. ,vol. 17, pp. 37-61, 1982. [26] P.Brown, A. W .Kleidon, and T .A .Marsh, ‘‘Newevidence on the nature of size-related anomalies in stock prices, ’’J. Fin. Econ.,vol. 12, pp. 33-56, 1983. [27] J.A. Nelder and R. Mead, ‘ ‘A simplexmethod for function minimization, ’’Computer J .(UK),vol. 7, pp. 308-313, 1964.Optimization of T rading - 33 - Ingber & Mondescu [28] G.P .Barabino, G.S. Barabino, B. Bianco, and M. Marchesi, ‘ ‘A study on the performances of simplexmethods for function minimization, ’’ inProc. IEEE Int. Conf .Circuits and Computer s, 1980, pp. 1150-1153. [29] L.Ingber,‘‘Canonical momenta indicators of financial mark ets and neocortical EEG, ’’ inProgress in Neural Information Pr ocessing,,ed. by S.-I. Amari, L. Xu, I. King, and K.-S. Leung, Springer , NewYork, 1996, pp. 777-784. [30] L. Ingber,‘‘Statistical mechanics of nonlinear nonequilibrium financial markets: Applications to optimized trading, ’’Mathl. Computer Modelling ,vol. 23, pp. 101-121, 1996. [31] H.Haken,Synergetics,3rd ed., Springer ,New York, 1983. [32] L. Ingber,M.F.Wehner,G.M. Jabbour ,and T.M. Barnhill, ‘ ‘Application of statistical mechanics methodology to term-structure bond-pricing models, ’’Mathl. Comput. Modelling ,vol. 15, pp. 77-98, 1991. [33] L. Ingber,‘‘Statistical mechanics of neocortical interactions: A scaling paradigm applied to electroencephalograph y,’’Phys. Rev. A,vol. 44, pp. 4017-4060, 1991. [34] K.S. Cheng, ‘‘Quantization of a general dynamical system by Fe ynman’spath integration formulation, ’’J. Math. Phys. ,vol. 13, pp. 1723-1726, 1972. [35] H. Dekker,‘‘Functional integration and the Onsager-Machlup Lagrangian for continuous Mark ov processes in Riemannian geometries, ’’Phys. Rev. A,vol. 19, pp. 2102-2111, 1979. [36] R. Graham, ‘ ‘Path-inte gral methods in nonequilibrium thermodynamics and statistics, ’’ in Stochastic Processes in Nonequilibrium Systems ,,ed. by L. Garrido, P .Seglar,and P.J. Shepherd, Springer,New York, NY,1978, pp. 82-138. [37] F.Langouche, D. Roekaerts, and E. T irapegui, ‘‘Discretization problems of functional integrals in phase space, ’’Phys. Rev. D,vol. 20, pp. 419-432, 1979. [38] F.Langouche, D. Roekaerts, and E. T irapegui, ‘‘Short deri vation of Feynman Lagrangian for general diffusion process, ’’J. Phys. A,vol. 113, pp. 449-452, 1980. [39] F.Langouche, D. Roekaerts, and E. T irapegui, Functional Inte gration and Semiclassical Expansions ,Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1982.Optimization of T rading - 34 - Ingber & Mondescu [40] M. Rosa-Clot and S. Taddei, A path inte gral approach to deri vative security pricing: I. F ormalism and analytic results, INFN, Firenze, Italy ,1999. [41] H.Dekker,‘‘On the most probable transition path of a general diffusion process, ’’Phys. Lett. A ,vol. 80, pp. 99-101, 1980. [42] P.Hagedorn,Non-Linear Oscillations ,Oxford Uni v.,New York, NY,1981. [43] B.Oksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations ,Springer,New York, NY,1998. [44] J.M. Harrison and D. Kreps, ‘ ‘Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities mark ets,’’J. Econ. Theory ,vol. 20, pp. 381-408, 1979. [45] S.R. Pliska,Introduction to Mathematical Finance ,Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1997. [46] C.W .Gardiner,Handbook of Stoc hastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, German y, 1983. [47] R.C. Merton, ‘ ‘Anintertemporal capital asset pricing model, ’’Econometrica ,vol. 41, pp. 867-887, 1973. [48] L.Ingber,‘‘Statistical mechanics of neocortical interactions: Stability and duration of the 7+−2 rule of short-term-memory capacity ,’’Phys. Rev. A,vol. 31, pp. 1183-1186, 1985. [49] S.Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gelatt, Jr., and M.P .Vecchi, ‘‘Optimization by simulated annealing, ’’Science, vol. 220, pp. 671-680, 1983. [50] S.Geman and D. Geman, ‘‘Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distrib ution and the Bayesian restoration in images,’’IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mac. Int. ,vol. 6, pp. 721-741, 1984. [51] H.Szu and R. Hartle y, ‘‘Fast simulated annealing, ’’Phys. Lett. A ,vol. 122, pp. 157-162, 1987. [52] M. Wofsey, ‘‘Technology: Shortcut tests v alidity of complicated formulas, ’’The Wall Str eet Journal,vol. 222, pp. B1, 1993. [53] J.C. Cox and S. A. Ross, ‘‘The v aluation of options for alternati ve stochastic processes, ’’J. Fin. Econ.,vol. 3, pp. 145-166, 1976. [54] P.J. Kaufman, Tr ading systems and Methods, 3r dedition,John Wiley&Sons, NewYork, NY,1998. [55] W.Brock, J. Lakonishok, and B. LeBaron, ‘ ‘Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns, ’’J. Finance,vol. 47, pp. 1731-1763, 1992.Optimization of T rading - 35 - Ingber & Mondescu FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1. Futures and cash data, contract ESU0 June 20: solid line — futures; dashed line — cash. Figure 2. Futures and cash data, contract ESU0 June 22: solid line — futures; dashed line — cash. Figure 3. CMI data, real-time trading June 20: solid line — CMI; dashed line — neutral line; dotted line — uncertainty band. Figure 4. CMI data, real-time trading, June 22: solid line — CMI; dashed line — neutral line; dotted line — uncertainty band. Figure 5. CMI trading signals, real-time trading June 20: dashed line — local-model a verage of the neutral line; dotted line — uncertainty band multiplied by the optimization parameter M=0. 15. Figure 6. CMI trading signals, real-time trading June 22: dashed line — local-model a verage of the neutral line; dotted line — uncertainty band multiplied by the optimization parameter M=0. 15.Optimization of T rading - 36 - Ingber & Mondescu TABLE CAPTIONS Table 1. Matrix of Training Runs. Table 2. Matrix of Testing Runs.Optimization of T rading - Figure 1 - Ingber & Mondescu 06-20 10:46:16 06-20 11:45:53 06-20 12:45:30 06-20 13:45:07 06-20 14:44:44 TIME (mm-dd hh-mm-ss)146514701475148014851490149515001505 S&PFutures CashESU0 data June 20 time resolution = 55 secsOptimization of T rading - Figure 2 - Ingber & Mondescu 06-22 12:56:53 06-22 13:56:30 06-22 14:56:07 TIME (mm-dd hh-mm-ss)14501455146014651470147514801485S&PFutures CashESU0 data June 22 time resolution = 55 secsOptimization of T rading - Figure 3 - Ingber & Mondescu 06-20 10:46:16 06-20 11:45:53 06-20 12:45:30 06-20 13:45:07 06-20 14:44:44 TIME (mm-dd hh-mm-ss)-8-4048CMIΠF (CMI Futures) ΠF 0 (neutral CMI) ΔΠF (theory)Canonical Momenta Indicators (CMI) time resolution = 55 secsOptimization of T rading - Figure 4 - Ingber & Mondescu 06-22 12:56:53 06-22 13:56:30 06-22 14:56:07 TIME (mm-dd hh-mm-ss)-8-4048CMIΠF (CMI Futures) ΠF 0 (neutral CMI) ΔΠF (theory)Canonical Momenta Indicators (CMI) time resolution = 55 secsOptimization of T rading - Figure 5 - Ingber & Mondescu 06-20 10:46:16 06-20 11:45:53 06-20 12:45:30 06-20 13:45:07 06-20 14:44:44 TIME (mm-dd hh-mm-ss)-1-0.500.51CMI<ΠF 0> (local) M ΔΠFCanonical Momenta Indicators (CMI) time resolution = 55 secsOptimization of T rading - Figure 6 - Ingber & Mondescu 06-22 12:56:53 06-22 13:56:30 06-22 14:56:07 TIME (mm-dd hh-mm-ss)-1-0.500.51CMI<ΠF 0> M ΔΠFCanonical Momenta Indicators time resolution = 55 secsOptimization of T rading - Table 1 - Ingber & Mondescu TRAINING SET TRADING R ULES ST ATISTICS P ARAMETERS ( ΔtW M) 4D ESM0 0321-0324 LOCAL MODEL Parameters 55 90 0.125 55 88 0.15 60 40 0.275 $profit (loss) 1390 1215 1167 #trades 16 16 17 #days + 333 %winners 75 75 76 MULTIPLE MODELS Parameters 45 76 0.175 45 72 0.20 60 59 0.215 $profit (loss) 2270 2167.5 1117.5 #trades 18 17 17 #days + 443 %winners 83 88 76 5D ESM0 0327-0331 LOCAL MODEL Parameters 20 22 0.60 20 24 0.55 10 54 0.5 $profit (loss) 437 352 (35) #trades 15 16 1 #days + 330 %winners 67 63 0 MULTIPLE MODELS Parameters 45 74 0.25 40 84 0.175 30 110 0.15 $profit (loss) 657.5 635 227.5 #trades 3 19 26 #days + 532 %winners 100 68 65 5D ESM0 0410-0414 LOCAL MODEL Parameters 50 102 0.10 50 142 0.10 35 142 0.10 $profit (loss) 1875 1847 1485 #trades 35 19 34 #days + 334 %winners 60 58 62 MULTIPLE MODELS Parameters 45 46 0.25 40 48 0.30 60 34 0.30 $profit (loss) 2285 2145 1922.5 #trades 39 23 29 #days + 333 %winners 72 87 72Optimization of T rading - Table 2 - Ingber & Mondescu PARAMETERS ( ΔtW M) TESTING SETS ST ATISTICS LOCAL MODEL MUL TIPLE MODELS 55 90 0.125 55 88 0.15 60 40 0.275 45 76 0.175 45 72 0.20 60 59 0.215 5D ESM0 0327-0331 $profit (loss) (712) (857) (1472) (605) (220) (185) #trades 20 17 16 18 12 11 #days + 221 311 %winners 50 47 44 67 67 54 4D ESM0 0403-0407 $profit (loss) (30) 258 602 1340 2130 932 #trades 18 13 16 16 17 13 #days + 332 111 %winners 56 54 56 50 53 38 5D ESM0 0410-0414 $profit (loss) 750 1227 (117) (530) (1125) (380) #trades 30 21 23 23 20 18 #days + 333 223 %winners 60 62 48 48 50 50

arXiv:physics/0007076v1 [physics.optics] 25 Jul 2000About nondegenerative four photon mixing gain spectroscopy of the SF6molecules. V.A.Kuz’menko Troitsk Institute of Innovation and Fusion Research, Troitsk, Moscow region, 142092, Russian Federation. Abstract Infrared-infrared double resonance measurements of the ν3absorption band of SF6using a CO2TEA laser radiation have been carried out. The results obtained in the present and in some earlier works are discussed taking into account existence of a wide component of lines, n ondegen- erative four photon mixing (NFPM) and time invariance viola tion in the photon-molecule interactions. It is proposed to use the NFP M effect in in- vestigations of the shape of the optical transition in polya tomic molecules and especially for evaluation of the homogeneous width of th e wide com- ponent of lines. The need and problems of experimental study of existing effects of the T-invariance violation in optics are discusse d. PACS number: 42.65.-k, 33.70.-w, 33.80.-b Introduction Studies of the IR-IR double resonance in SF6were widely carried out in 70’s with a purpose to clarify the mechanism of the IR multiple pho ton excitation (IR MPE) of the polyatomic molecules. Large experimental mater ial was obtained in this area in the subsequent years [1,2]. Also, a substanti al progress was achieved in understanding the underlying physical process es. All this demands to reexamine the old experiments, as they contain interesti ng and important information. A very strong bleaching in SF6was observed in the work [3]. This bleaching was destroyed by molecular collisions at characteristic ra te ofpτ= 48ns mbar. An effect of the direct multiphoton absorption of the pump las er radiation by molecules was proposed as a candidate for explanation of thi s bleaching. On the contrary, in works [4,5] a hypothesis was proposed of exi stence of some wide component in the absorption line of the polyatomic molecule s. If the natural width of this wide component greater, than anharmonicity of vibrations, the IR MPE can occur in a natural way. Later, this idea was proved e xperimen- tally, when the far wings in the absorption band of polyatomi c molecules were found [6], which were independent on the gas pressure. The in tensities of these lorentzian-like band wings well coordinate with the satura tion data of molecular absorption at low pressure, with the data of depletion of rot ational levels in the SF6molecules [7,8] and with the data on the SF6absorption of laser radiation in the molecular beam conditions [9]. Integrated intensity of this wide com- ponent can be rather easily estimated from the saturated spe ctrum data. But the natural width can be measured correctly only in the molec ular beam condi- tions, where rotational temperature is extremely low. Ther efore, development 1of methods for measuring this width in the room temperature c ell conditions is of great interest. Experiments on the IR-IR double resonance provide such an op portunity. The bleaching, observed in work [3], is very similar to the co herent effect of NFPM. In the latter case, redistribution of energy between a powerful pump beam and a weak probe beam takes place. It is well known, that s uch a pro- cess proceeds in SF6very effectively (up to depletion of the pump beam) as a superradiation in the case of degenerative four photon mix ing (DFPM) in a somewhat specific conditions (a short cell and high SF6pressure) [10]. As in the case of the coherent Raman gain spectroscopy [11,12], sp ectral dependence of the NFPM efficiency contains information about the shape of the optical transition. The peculiarity of this case is that the NFPM effe ct occurs within a very wide optical transition. Thus, the spectral width of t he bleaching effect characterizes the homogeneous width of the optical transit ion. The purpose of the current work was to repeat the experiments of work [3], to perform some more detailed study of the spectral char acteristics of the bleaching effect, to discuss the role of the NFPM and to propos e to use it for determination of the widths of line wings of polyatomic m olecules in the condition of cell experiments at room temperature. However , in the present experiments any nondegenerative bleaching was absent. Experiment The experimental set-up is shown in Fig.1. The main differenc e from work [3] was that a separate mirror (3) with R=-2m was used for focu sing the laser radiation in the copper waveguide absorption cell (ø10mm an d length 110cm). The probe laser radiation passed through the hole ø8mm in the mirror (4) without focusing and was registered by an integrated calori meter 2. Such an experimental set-up allows to work without a monochromator and to measure absorption of the probe laser radiation in the case of coinci ding frequencies of the pump and the probe lasers. The difference in divergences o f the scattered pump radiation and that of the probe laser is so great, that to tal energy of pump radiation, registered by the calorimeter 2 at the dista nce∼1mfrom the mirror (4) is <10µjand does not prevent to measure the energy of the probe pulse. The resonator of the probe laser was formed by a rather flat mir ror (R=-50m) and a diffraction grating. Its radiation was characterized b y small divergence and good uniformity of the beam. Nitrogen free gas mixture wa s used. Multi- mode laser pulse had a full width about 100ns at half maximum w ithout any ”tail” and consisted of chaotic spikes. The pump laser had an unstable resonator and two very old BaF2coated NaCl windows. In the far field region, where it was focused, ra diation was very non-uniform and had a typical speckle-structure. With small contents of nitrogen in the gas mixture, the multimode pulse consisted o f a spike about 100ns FWHM and a ”tail” about 3 µsfull length, that contained about 20% of the total pulse energy. Directions of polarization of both l aser beams coincided. Temporal characteristics were measured by means of a photon -drag detector and an oscilloscope (not shown in the figure). 2The measurements were carried out at pressures 1,5 Torr SF6for the P10— P14 and R10—R20 lines, 1,0 Torr for line P16 and 0,4 Torr SF6for lines P18— P30. Experimental results The results of the IR-IR double resonance experiments are pr esented in Fig.2. The pump laser was tuned in the P16 line. Similar results were obtained when the pump laser was tuned in the P20 line. Incident pump laser fl uence in the waveguide was 250 mj/cm2. Energy fluence of the probe laser radiation was 7mj/cm2. The latter was decreased down to 1 mj/cm2in some experiments without any changes in the results. In the whole range of test ing (including the R10—R20 area) only increase in absorption of the probe la ser radiation was observed. Some bleaching effect was observed only when both lasers were working on the same line. Apparent mutual influence of the lasers was obs erved in this case. Were the pulses of both lasers synchronized, energy of the probe laser pulse decreased by ∼10%, and its beam pattern became non-uniform. The distance between two lasers was about 10m in this case, so tha t only scattered pump laser radiation could get into the resonator of the prob e laser. Also, a set of experiments was carried out in which the same la ser radiation was used both for pumping and for probing. Again, the bleachi ng effect was found in this case. An open square in Fig.2 corresponds to the case, when the probe laser was used, and the full square illustrates the cas e of using only the pump laser radiation. Discussion IR-IR double resonance was studied in numerous works [3,13- 17]. These experiments frequently gave contradictory results, and it was difficult to give satisfactory explanations to these contradictions. At pre sent, however, the sit- uation has substantially cleared up. A wide component with Lorentzian FWHM ∼150GHz exists in the spec- trum of narrow absorption lines of SF6molecule [6]. Its integral intensity for the 1←0 transition of the ν3band contains only ∼0,2% of the integral inten- sity of this optical transition. However, absorption of the powerful pump laser radiation takes place just through this component. The weak er probe radiation can be absorbed mainly through the narrow or through the wide component of the line. Thus, the results of probing can be different. All ex periments on the IR-IR double resonance in SF6can be conditionally broken into three classes: (1) when the probing occurs through the narrow component of l ines, (2) when the probing occurs through the wide component of lines and (3 ) an intermediate case. In the work [13] very weak probe radiation of the CW CO2laser with inten- sity∼1mW/cm2was used. Both induced transmissions in the P8—P22 region of the probe laser frequencies and induced absorption in the red side were ob- served. Saturation of the narrow component of lines was abse nt in this case. The main cause of the observed effects was an anharmonic shift of the optical transitions of the excited molecules. It is surprising, but experiments with megawatt intensity a nd picosecond 3timescale probe pulse laser radiation belong to the same cla ss [14]. In this case laser radiation has large spectral width ( ∼1cm−1). Therefore, any saturation of the narrow component of lines is again absent, and the resu lts of these ex- periments coincide practically with those of work [13]. CWCO2probe laser radiation with intensity about 0 ,1−0,5W/cm2was used in works [15-17]. These experiments belong to the inter mediate class. Here we can see appearance of appreciable saturation of the narro w component of lines. Also, absorption through the wide component of lines begins to play some role. This role depends on exact tuning of the probe laser rad iation frequency: is it set-up on a strong rotational line or between lines. Thu s, in the area P8-P22 both induced transmission and induced absorption can be obs erved. A specific effect of short-time induced absorption in the cour se of the pump pulse was observed in work [16]. One should keep in mind, that planes of polarization of the probe and the pump laser radiation were o rthogonal in this experiment. A coherent polarization effect could take place in this case, that is due to the population transfer between degenerated levels. Phenomena of this kind are studied in the atomic polarization spectroscopy [1 8], and they are out of scope of the present paper. Experiments of the present paper belong to the next class, wh en probing occurs mainly through the wide component of lines. Average p robe laser in- tensity was 10−70kW/cm2. Saturation of the narrow component of lines was much stronger in this case. The role of the wide component in a bsorption of the probing radiation became essential. In this case, besides the anharmonic shift, an effect of sharp growth of inte- gral intensity of the wide component in the region of low lyin g vibrational levels should be taken into account. This effect manifests itself th rough a strong temperature dependence of the IR MPE process [9,19]. In some range of the ex- perimental conditions this effect becomes decisive, and the n induced absorption of the probe laser radiation can be observed in all spectral i ntervals. To the same class of experiments the works [9,20] belong. In t he work [9] the experiments were carried out in the molecular beam condi tions. Along with rather high intensity of the probe laser radiation ( ∼10kW/cm2), these exper- imental conditions were characterized by ultralow ( ∼50K) rotational temper- ature [21]. A number of rotational lines were very low, and th e probe laser radiation interacted practically with the wide component o f lines only. The obtained results were similar to those of the present work. O ne should keep in mind, however, that experiments of work [9] were carried out with rather hot gas (T= 5000K). A special case is work [3], where, as we believe, a coherent NF PM effect was observed. The first argument for such a conclusion is unusual ly strong effect of collisions. Even elastic collisions can destroy coherency . The second argument is amplification in the region R12-R20, that clearly indicat es the combination ν2+ν6band can contribute to this process. In this case the phase-m atched radiation must exist in the region near 915 cm−1, and it is better to search for it in the direct beams without waveguide. And the third argumen t is that in our experiments, which were carried out in rather similar condi tions, the character- 4istic bleaching was absent. This fact can be due to rather poo r coherency of the pump beam in our case. It is known, that efficiency of the DFPM eff ect is ex- tremely sensitive to the divergence and uniformity of the la ser beam [10,22,23]. In the works [15-17] the NFPM effect might be absent as a result of low intensity of probe radiation, and in the experiments with molecular be am [9] its absence could be a consequence of low density and small size of the int eraction zone. Is the bleaching effect, observed in our work, when both laser s radiate on the same line, a result of four photon mixing? Absence of such an effect in the molecular beam conditions ( [9], Fig.3, without exact adjus ting) is an indirect argument for the positive answer. In this case, the NFPM effec t can be a consequence of a very small difference in the frequencies of t he pump and probe radiation. Thus, detailed experimental studies of occurrence of the NF PM effect in SF6 are of undoubted interest. They can give information about t he shape of optical transitions, and not only about the forward transitions, bu t maybe about the backward ones. Why one needs the NFPM effect to present within the wide and hom ogeneous optical transition? Here we are concerning a very important and interesting question about the time invariance violation in the photon- atom and photon- molecule interactions. Basing on the considerations of sym metry, the theorists assume the existence of the T-invariance violation effects i n optics for a long time. It is not known, however, in which part of optics and in w hich form could these effects exist. For many years the scientists try to find t hem in the form of the so-called electrical dipole moment (EDM) [24]. The EDM i s not found till now. General situation, however, is that the whole nonlinear opt ics based on or connected with T-invariance violation. The principle of T-invariance vio- lation is obviously a quantum analog of the nonlinear suscep tibility principle. Most of the nonlinear effects in optics can be explained from t he quantum point of view on the basis of the T-invariance violat ion principle. The effect of T-invariance violation usually manifests itself o nly in an indirect way, for example, as a population transfer effect at sweeping the r esonance condi- tions [25]. Usually, experimenters cannot control the natu ral width and the cross-section of optical transitions in such a way to be able to compare these parameters for the forward and backward processes. Maybe a unique exception for this day is the wide component of lines. It is a unique physical object that is characterized by an unusu al combination of properties: a huge homogeneous width of transition is com bined with long lifetime of the excited state. This allows to divorce in time and in space the process of laser excitation and that of monitoring the exite d states of molecules [9]. These experiments yield fantastic results: the width o f the backward optical transition proves to be more than five orders of magnitude les s than that of the forward one, the cross-section of the backward transition b eing more, than four orders of magnitudes greater, than that of the forward one [2 6]. These exper- iments provide a direct and full experimental proof of exist ence of the strong T-invariance violation in the photon-molecule interactio ns. For more detailed 5experimental study of the T-invariance violation effect we n eed to reanimate and straightforwardly continue experiments of work [9] (fig .5, 6). In principle, experiments of this type can be carried out in t he cell conditions also. It is possible to study the dependence of absorption of the probe radiation on the angle between the probe and the pump beams. We expect to see a transition from direct stimulated deexcitation of molecul es to the four photon mixing effect, which can reach a superradiation regime in opt imum conditions [10,22]. We hope to prolong such experiments in future using the straight crossed beams without waveguide. It would be useful, if the same stud ies were conducted somewhere else. The author is grateful to Dr. V.S.Mezhevov for equipping us w ith a pump laser and to Dr. A.P.Dyad’kin for discussions. References [1] W.Fuss and K.L.Kompa, Prog.Quant.Electr. 7, 117 (1981). [2]Laser Spectroscopy of Highly Vibrationally Excited Molecu les, ed. V.S.Letokhov, Adam Hilger, Bristol (1989). [3] W.Fuss and J.Hartmann, J.Chem.Phys. 70, 5468 (1979). [4] V.Yu.Baranov, A.P.Dyad’kin and V.A.Kuz’menko Kvantov aya Elektron. (Moscow) 15, 732 (1988). [5] V.A.Kuz’menko Preprint of the Institute of Atomic Energ y4886/12 , Moscow (1989). [6] V.A.Kuz’menko,E-print,aps1998dec29 002, http://publish.aps.org/eprint/ [7] V.M.Apatin, V.M.Krivtsun, G.N.Makarov, I.Pak and M.V. Sotnikov, Opt.Commun. 47, 251 (1983). [8] Yu.A.Kuritsyn, G.N.Makarov, I.Pak and M.V.Sotnikov, Z h.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 94, 65 (1988). [9] C.Liedenbaum, S.Stolte and J.Reuss, Chem.Phys. 122, 443 (1988). [10] L.T.Bolotskikh, V.G.Popkov, A.K.Popov and V.M.Shala ev, Kvantovaya Elektron.(Moscow) 13, 942 (1986), Sov.J.Quantum. Electron. 16, 616 (1986). [11] A.Owyoung, IEEE J.Quant.Electr. 14, 192 (1978). [12] Y.R.Shen, The Principles of Nonlinear Optics , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1984). [13] V.N.Bagratashvili, V.S.Doljikov and V.S.Letokhov, Z h.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 76, 18 (1979). 6[14] R.C.Sharp, E.Yablonovitch and N.Bloembergen, J.Chem .Phys. 74, 5357 (1981). [15] S.S.Alimpiev, V.N.Bagratashvili, N.V.Karlov, V.S.L etokhov, V.V.Lobko, A.A.Makarov, B.G.Sartakov and E.M.Khokhlov, JETP Lett. 25, 547 (1977). [16] T.F.Deutsch and S.R.J.Brueck, Chem.Phys.Lett. 54, 258 (1978). [17] T.F.Deutsch and S.R.J.Brueck, J.Chem.Phys. 70, 2063 (1979). [18] D.Budker, D.F.Kimball, S.M.Rochester and V.V.Yashch uk, Phys.Rev.Lett. 83, 1767 (1999), E-print, aps1999may12 006, http://publish.aps.org/eprint/ [19] W.Tsay, C.Riley and D.O.Ham, J.Chem.Phys. 70, 3558 (1979). [20] V.N.Lokhman, A.N.Petin, E.A.Ryabov and V.S.Letokhov , J.Phys.Chem. A,103, 11293 (1999). [21] A.Linskens, S.L.Hekkert and J.Reuss, Infrared Phys. 32, 259 (1991). [22] V.Yu.Baranov, A.P.Dyad’kin and O.V.Shpilyun, Kvanto vaya Elektron. (Moscow) 15, 2355 (1988), Sov.J.Quantum.Electron. 18, 1475 1988. [23] V.A.Kuz’menko Unpublished results. [24] I.B.Khriplovich and S.K.Lamorcaux, CP Violation Without Strangeness , Springer, (1998), I.B.Khriplovich, E-print, hep-ph/990 6533, http://xxx.lanl.gov/ [25] V.A.Kuz’menko,E-print,aps1999sep30 002, http://publish.aps.org/eprint/ [26] V.A.Kuz’menko, E-print, hep-ph/0002084, http://xxx .lanl.gov/ 7NaCl Abs. cell Probe laser Pump lasercal.1 cal.212 34 Shield Fig.1. Experimental set-up. 1,2- flat mirror. 3- focusing mirror. 4- flat mirror with the hole.32302826242220181614121080,114 3 2 1 Fig. 2. Measured absorption cross-section versus probe laser line. Different points were determined at different times befor and after the onset of the pump laser spike. 1) -1µs, 2) 0µs, 3) +1µs, 4) +2µs.σσ cm2 10-18 laser line

arXiv:physics/0007077v1 [physics.ed-ph] 25 Jul 2000The Nobel Prize in Physics 1999 The last Nobel Prize of the Millenium in Physics has been awar ded jointly to Professor Gerardus ’t Hooft of the University of Utrecht in Holland and his thesi s advisor Professor Emeritus Martinus J.G. Veltman of Holland. According to the Academy’s citatio n, the Nobel Prize has been awarded for ’elucidating the quantum structure of electroweak inte raction in Physics’. It further goes on to say that they have placed particle physics theory on a firmer m athematical foundation. In this short note, we will try to understand both these aspects of the awar d. The work for which they have been awarded the Nobel Prize was done in 1971. However, the precis e predictions of properties of particles that were made possible as a result of their work, were tested to a very high degree of accuracy only in this last decade. To understand the full significance of th is Nobel Prize, we will have to summarise briefly the developement of our current theoretical framewo rk about the basic constituents of matter and the forces which hold them together. In fact the path can b e partially traced in a chain of Nobel prizes starting from one in 1965 to S. Tomonaga, J. Schwinger and R. Feynman, to the one to S.L. Glashow, A. Salam and S. Weinberg in 1979, and then to C. Rubia and Simon van der Meer in 1984 ending with the current one. In the article on ‘Search for a final theory of matter’ in this i ssue, Prof. Ashoke Sen has described the ‘Standard Model (SM)’ of particle physics, wherein he has li sted all the elementary particles according to the SM. These consist of the matter particles: the quarks and leptons along with various vector bosons γ,W±,Z0and gluons gwhich mediate the various interactions between them. Box 1 s ummarises them here again for sake of completeness. As explained in that art icle, one of the conceptual cornerstones of the current description of particle physics is the fact that an interaction (say Coulomb) between two elementary particles (say electrons) can be understood either (i) as the effect of the force field generated by one of them on the other one or equivalently (ii) as arising due to an exchange of the carrier of the force (photon in this case) between them. The photon is the ‘q uantum’ of the electromagnetic field. The range as well as the dependence of this force on the relati ve spins and positions of the particles is correlated with the properties of this quantum and this can b e established in a well defined mathematical framework. Box 2 depicts this equivalence in a pictorial man ner. We know that just as Newtonian mechanics is the right mathema tical framework to describe the terresterial and celestial motion, quantum mechanics is th e right language to describe the motion of molecules, atoms, electrons, neutrons/protons at the mole cular/subatomic and subnuclear level. If we want to describe, in addition to these, creations and annihi lation of particles, e.g. as happens in the spontaneous transitions of an atom, we need to further exten d this mathematical framework to the next higher level of sophistication called ‘Quantum Field T heory’ (QFT). In QFT not only that we employ fields to describe the carriers of interaction, the ma tter particles are also described by matter fields. Another cornerstone of our theoretical understanding of th e fundamental particles and their in- teractions is the realization of the important role played b y Symmetries / Invariances. The idea of symmetries can be understood in the following way. Laws of ph ysics,let us say /vectorF=md2/vector x dt2, should be the same no matter which point in the universe do we choose as t he origin of our coordinate system. 1This means that the physics is unchanged under a change of the origin of the coordinate system. This is expressed by saying that the system is invariant under a tr ansformation of coordinates involving translations in space. As per our current understanding, un derlying,fundamental invariance principles actually dictate the form of interactions. Let us understan d it by taking the example of gravitation. Newton deduced the law of gravitation from the observation o f motion. On the other hand Einstein wrote down the general theory of relativity by postulating t hat the description of motion should be the same for two observers employing two coordinate systems whi ch are related to each other by a general transformation. In particular the transformation can be di fferent at different points in space-time. The non-relativistic limit of this theory (i.e. when objects mo ve at speeds much lower than light) contains Newton’s theory of gravitation. Thus the ‘general co-ordin ate invariance’ ‘explains’ the laws of gravi- tation ‘deduced’ by Newton. So in some sense we have a theoret ical udnerstanding of an observed law of nature in terms of a deeper guiding principle. The tenet of current theoretical description of particle physics is that the Quantum Field Theories which have certai n invariances are the correct theoretical framework for this description. The invariance that is most relevant for the discussion here is the so called ‘local gauge invariance’. Without going into the details of the idea, let us just note th at this is basically a generalization of the idea that in electrostatics the Electric field and hence t he electrostatic force depends only on the difference in potential, and not on the actual values of the potential, i .e. setting of the zero of the potential scale is arbitrary as far as the force is concerned . Quantum Field Theories , though now theaccepted framework for describing particles and their interactions, were in the doghouse for a long time in the 60s b ecause they used to predict nonsensical, infinite results for properties of particles when one tried t o compute them accurately. The difficulties arise essentially because of the nontrivial structure that the vacuum has in QFT. This can be visualized by thinking about effect that a medium has on particle propert ies;e.g.the transport of an electron in a solid can be described more easily by imagining that its m ass gets changed to an ‘effective’ mass. Another example is the polarization of the charges, in a diel ectric medium, caused by a charged particle. This polarization can cause a ‘change’ of the charge of the pa rticle. In QFT, vacuum acts as a nontrivial medium. The troublesome part, however, is that when one trie s to calculate this change in the charge due to the ‘vacuum polarisation’, one gets infinite results. Tomonaga, Schwinger and Feynman (who got the Nobel Prize in 1965) put the Quantum Field Theoretic d escription of the electron and photon (Quantum Electrodynamics) on a firm mathematical footing Th ey showed how one can use the theory to make sensible, testable predictions for particle proper ties (such as a small shift in the energy level of an electron in the Hydrogen atom due to the effect of vacuum p olarization), in spite of these infinities. If this can be done always in a consistent manner, then the corresponding QFT is said to be renormalizable . The point to note is that the ‘local gauge invariance’ menti oned earlier was absolutely essential for the proof of renormalizability of Quantum Ele ctrodynamics (QED). The best example where the predictions of this theory were te sted to an unprecedented accuracy is the measurement of gyromagnetic ratio of the e−viz.ge. This is predicted to be 2 based on a quantum mechanical equation which is written down with the requirem ent that the description of the e−is the 2same for two observers moving relative to each other with a co nstant velocity. (Dirac equation for the cognocsenti). The experimentally measured value is clo se to 2 but differs from it significantly. In QED one can calculate the corrections to the value of ge= 2 coming from effects of interaction of the electron whereby it emits a γand absorbs it again, in a systematic fashion. Box 3 indicate s some of these corrections. The measured value agrees with theoreti cal prediction to 11 significant places as shown in Box 3. Thus to summarize so far, the electromagnetic interactions between the electron and photons can be described in terms of a QFT. The description has immense pr edictive power due to the property of renormalizability that the theory has. The theory has this p roperty only because it of its invariance under a set of transformations called U(1) local gauge trans formations. With this, we come to a point in the history in 1971 when partic le physicists had a unified description of electromagnetic and weak interaction in terms of exchang e ofγ,W±andZ0. S. Weinberg, A. Salam and S. Glashow later got the Nobel Prize in 1979 for putting fo rward this EW model. Just as unification of electricity and magnetism by Maxwell had predicted the ve locity of light ’c’ in terms of the dielectric constant and magnetic permeability ǫ0andµ0of the vacuum, this unification predicted values of masses MW,MZin terms of the ratios of two coupling strengths, called sin2θW. These coupling strengths are the analogue of the electric charge in QED. Details of these r elations are displayed in Box 4. C. Rubia and Simon Van der Meer got the Nobel Prize in 1984 for discover ing the W±andZ0bosons with masses and decays as predicted by the EW model. TheW±,Z0bosons were found to have nonzero masses ( MW= 80.33±0.15GeV,M Z= 91.187± 0.007GeVwhere 1 GeVis approximately the mass of a proton). As a result the early e fforts to cast this electroweak model in the framework of a QFT, by using a more co mplicated gauge invariance suggested by a generalisation of QED, met with failure. Their nonzero m ass makes a QFT incorporating these bosons noninvariant under these gauge transformations. Th is makes the theory nonrenormalizable. This means calculating corrections to the relation 1 in Box 4 is again riddled with infinities. At around the same time P. Higgs and others had proposed a way t o write a QFT of massive W±,Z0 bosons, where the mass term did not spoil the gauge invarianc e of the theory. This required existence of an additional particle called the Higgs boson. This is whe re ’t Hooft and Veltman stepped in. ’t Hooft demonstrated, in his thesis work and the paper publish ed in Nuclear Physics B in 1971, first that the QFT with massless W±andZ0was renormalizable and the invariance of the theory under more complex noncommutative local gauge transformations w as essential for that. He further showed that a QFT containing massive W±,Z0bosons would be renormalizable (i.e., coefficients of infinit e corrections would vanish identically) inspite of nonzero masses as long as the mass was generated through the mechanism suggested by P. Higgs. Together ‘t Hoo ft and Veltman developed new methods of calculation for the higher order corrections to particle properties, which explicitly preserved this gauge invariance. This work opened the floodgates of the pros pects of using the ElectroWeak theory to make accurate predictions and test the theory to a similar degree of accuracy as the QED cf.Box 3. Veltman led the program of calculation of various higher o rder corrections to EW quantities, having established that the results were guaranteed to be finite. He actually developed a computer program 3called ‘Schoonship’ to use the computer to do these very comp licated analytical calculations specific to Theoretical High Energy Physics. This is the sense in which t he work of ’t Hooft and Veltman put the EW theory on a firm mathematical footing. This work was enough to convince the particle theorists that gauge theories with Higgs mechanism was the way to go to d escribe EW interactions. In QED the corrections ( e.g.to (g−2)eshown in Box 3) depended only on the mass and charge of an e−, wheras in EW theory they depend on the free parameters of thi s theory viz. the masses of various quarks and leptons. The corrections are dominated by the top quark due to its large mass. Box 4 shows the leading corrections predicted in the EW theory to the rat ioρ=M2 W M2 Zcos2θW. The measurement of MW/MZand sin2θWin 1984 were consistent with ρ= 1 which was the analogue of g= 2 prediction of QED. The measurements then were not precise enough to decide what the deviation of experimentlly measured value of ρfrom 1 was. In the decade since then, a detailed study of the pr operties of these bosons has been possible using the 10 million Z0bosons created at the Large Electron Positron Collider (LEP) in Geneva and thousands of W±bosons at the p¯pcollider Tevatron at Fermilab in Chicago. By 1993 ρwas found to be 1 .011±0.006. This implied, as can be seen from the Box 4, that the top quark, which was not discovered till 1995 must have a mass Mt∼180GeV. Finding the top quark in 1995 with a mass consistent with this value indeed tested the predictions of the EW theory to high accuracy. The precision of these measurements meant that if one did not use the corrected expressions, the values of M2 W,M2 Zand sin2θWwould not be consistent with each other within the SM. Even though not shown in Box 4, the corrections to this ratio a lso depend on the mass of the only particle in the SM which is as yet undiscovered viz. the Higgs Boson, albeit very weakly. The figure in Box 5 shows the region in the MW−Mtplane that is indicated by measurements today. The straight line shows predictions of the SM for different value s of the Higgs boson. So just as five years ago, one used these measurements to ‘determine’ values of Mt(which was then not measured) now particle physicists are using them to ‘determine’ the mass o f the elusive Higgs particle. These precision measurements narrow down the mass range where the Higgs boso n is likely to be found if SM is indeed completely correct. Hunt for this will be on at the Large Hadr on Collider (LHC) which will go in action in 2006. The EW theory predicts a slew of measurable quantities in ter ms of the basic parameters of the theory viz. the couplings and masses of quarks/leptons. Fig . in Box 6 shows a comparison of the predictions of the SM (corrected for these loop effects) with data. The numbers in the third column indicate the difference between the prediction and measurem ent in units of the standard deviation. It is this agreement, which would be nowhere as excellent if we d o not include the higher order correc- tions, that has proved that the EW interactions are correctl y described in terms of a Quantum Field Theory whose renormalizability was established by ’t Hooft and Veltman’s work. Their Nobel prize is also the recognition of the success of QFT and Gauge Princi ple which are the two cornerstones of the mathematical description and understanding of the elec tromagnetic, weak and strong interactions among fundamental particles. The only part of this edifice th at is as yet not honoured with a Nobel prize is QCD: Gauge theory of strong interactions. Who knows , in a few years we will be reading about 4the work of D. Gross, H. Politzer and F. Wilczek in a similar ar ticle! 5This figure "box1.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0007077v1This figure "box2.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0007077v1This figure "box3.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0007077v1This figure "box4.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0007077v1This figure "box5.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0007077v1This figure "box6.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0007077v1

Asymmetric Collision of Concepts: Why Eigenstates Alone are Not Enough for Neutrino Flavor Oscillations by John Michael Williams jwill@pacbell.net Markanix Co. P. O. Box 2697Redwood City, CA 94064 Workup notes for a poster presentation prepared for the SLAC 28th Summer Institute on Neutrinos, given at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, 2000 August 14 - 25. Based on preprint aps1998oct17_001 posted at the American Physical Society. Copyright (c) 2000, John Michael Williams. All Rights ReservedJ. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 2 1. Abstract The symmetry of the problem of the apparent deficit in upward-going atmospheric muon neutrinos reveals two possible, nonexclusive kinds of solution: Nonlinearity indistance or nonlinearity in angle of observation. Nonlinearity in distance leads to the most popular theory for the atmospheric problem, neutrino flavor oscillations. If the observed deficit is caused by oscillations and not, say, flavor-changing or other weak-force scattering, neutrinos must be massive. But,if flavor oscillations occur in vacuum, all oscillating neutrinos must have exactly equalmass. Theories of oscillation in matter such as the Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein(MSW) effect do not work in vacuum. This is the conceptual conflict of kinematics versusvacuum oscillations. Flavor-changing oscillations like those of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark theory become possible in vacuum if freely propagating neutrinos may beassociated with local substructure. Nonlinearity in angle of observation leads to a simple prediction of an excess of horizontal muon flavor. This and other angle-based effects should be observable at Super-Kamiokande or other instruments which can measure atmospheric flux by flavor.J. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 3 2. Atmospheric Muon-Neutrino Deficit 2.1 Linearities and Integration-Ratio Parameters We look closely at the theoretical context in which the atmospheric deficit in upward- going muon-neutrinos is identified, trying to understand all the relevant parameters. 2.1.1 Density Function for the Earth's Atmosphere A generic approach to the Earth's atmosphere just requires integration over the volume of a thin shell. For example, to compute the mass M of the atmosphere, define coordinates as in Fig. 1: Let the Earth have an average radius of 6400 km, and the atmosphere a density space constant of 4 km. An element of atmosphere located at point ()/c114pp r=,,qf will be associated with a density /c114 d of ()drK eRr k=- , in which K is the average density at sea level (about 1.3 kg m3) . For the mass M of the atmosphere, we then have, () Md d d r r K e RRr k==òòò ò òò¥ - /c114 dq f fpp 02 2 02 sin ; or, (2.1) () MK d d d r r e RRr k=Ø ºŒ ŒŒø ßœ œœòò ò¥ - qf fpp 02 02 24s i n . (2.2) After some arithmetic, M=×53 1018. kg, agreeing reasonably well with the known value [1] of about 45 1018.× kg. Thus, we validate our density function to be, () () dhK e eh kh ==- - ×134103.k g m3, for h the altitude in meters. (2.3) 2.1.2 Atmospheric Neutrino Observation Parameters We assume as an approximation that the probability of showering of a primary cosmic particle depends only on density of the atmosphere; the probability of a subsequent decaythen will depend on the inverse density [4*]. For any such event, there will be a flux of neutrinos with probability of emission PN of a neutrino of type N, {}Ne˛,,mt.Figure 1. Coordinates of a point p in the Earth's atmosphere.J. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 4 Consider the atmosphere of the Earth a thin shell ona sphere. Consider theobserved deficit the resultof comparison of countsagainst some benchmarkparticle (maybe ne) in two opposite solid angles a and b: The two angles may be assumed to define two cones of observationeach with apex at Super-K,the base of one directedskyward for downwardevents ( b, Fig. 2), the other toward the center of the Earth for upward events( a, Fig. 2). Here, a means "up" and b means "down", referring to the observed direction ofpropagation of the decayproducts. Obviously letting aba b=- Þ = , we immediately expect the upward Fa and downward Fb fluxes to be equal for a thin-shell atmosphere, because the linear extents of the thin-shell areas swept by equal angles at Super-K always will be proportional, and the linear distances to the thin shellsalways will be inversely proportional. Nevertheless, we seek more insight into the details. In Fig. 2, the flux Fb in cone b will be assumed given by downward decay events B inversely proportional to density ()dh of the atmosphere. After some figuring, using orthogonal components a1 and a2 to define a rectangular-based pyramid approximation to the differential circular cone angle a in Fig. 2, and likewise for b, we get an expression for up-down bias, assuming isotropic scattering in the atmosphere, () ()biasiso”=F Fa b()()()() ()()()()dd d r r D R dd d r r Drr rrupup downdownaa a d a bb b d baa bb12 1 21 12 1 212 1 2 22 òòò òòò+- +- -sin cos sin cosmin minminmax minmax , (2.4) Figure 2. Analysis of neutrino flux from an atmospheric decay event. Two solid angles (cones) of observation, a andb, are considered; the shaded regions show the atmosphere in the cones. Super-K is represented by the rectangle. Typical events Aj and Bj are assumed to create neutrinos with intensity ()Ijjw, the distribution over solid angle wj depending on the decay kinematics. The local coordinate detail for the element Aj is the same as for Bj, except the opposite direction of /c114r.J. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 5 in which we may set the greatest likely decay altitude to a conservative Dmax = 50 km (51 04× m), which is consistent with a low value from [5*]. We also assume Super-K, which is located inside a mountain, to be Dmin = 100 m above the average base of the atmosphere. In distance r from Super-K, then, rR Dupmin min=+2 ()=××26 41 06.+ 1 0 m2; we also have, then, rR Dupmax max=+2 ()=×× + ×26 41 0 51 064. m ; rDdownmin min== 100 m ; and, rDdownmax max== = × 50 5 104 km m . We see that (2.4) represents purely a geometric ratio, again having nothing to do with particle kinematics or detector energy sensitivity. Taking equal observation cones abh== on a diameter of the Earth, and using the exponential atmosphere as in (2.3), we may evaluate (2.4) easily. The cone angle integrals on a1 and b1 drop out when the angles are equal, and the cosh terms may be neglected in the exponential-atmosphere density terms, allowing the second angle integrals to drop out, too. The result, ()[] ()[]biasdr r D R dr r Drr rrupup downdowniso=+- +- -ò òd dmin minminmax minmax21 1, (2.5) again shows the same linearity as was evident in Fig. 2. The only parameter missing from (2.5) is that of the scattering profile of the cosmic particles. To describe the forward-scattering intensity,we may write the equation of a circle (sphere) centered on the event H and then distort it by stretching it along a radius RH of the Earth, as in Fig. 3, with the eccentricity parameter E. Symmetry about RH makes the signs of the angles unimportant. We obtain our result then by expressing w in terms of a2 and modifying Eq. (2.5); the bias numerator gains a scattering-intensity term so that, ()[] () Fup rr dd r r D R I upup =+ --òòad a a21 2 2 2min minmax ; (2.6) and likewise for the bias denominator. Using Fig. 3 to specify the intensity function, we may write, ()[] () ()[] ()biasdd r r D R E dd r r D Eup downrr rrupup downdownaniso==+- + ++- -òò òòF Fad a a bd b ba b212 222 21 2 212 222 21 22 2 2min minsin cos sin cosminmax minmax . (2.7)Figure 3. Distortion of a sphere to represent forward scattering with anisotropy E.J. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 6 However, once again, the integration over equal cone angles would make all angle terms drop out, and the scattering profile would make no difference. The only relevant parameters therefore are angle of observation and distance of the detector from the detected atmospheric scattering event. There seems to be no way that the ratio over equal observation angles can depart from the ratio determined by the cosmic particle decay event probabilities PN, for example, PP e uum, unless there is allowed some factor nonlinear with observation angle or distance. Therefore, any theory explaining the observed deficit must postulate a nonlinearity in observation angle or in distance. 2.2 Two Nonlinearities 2.2.1 Distance 2.2.1.1 oscillations [outline of usual formula derivation; nonlinear function] 2.2.1.2 decay [nonlinear, at least by square-law twice] 2.2.2 Angle2.2.2.1 refractive (elastic) scattering [nonlinear change of direction of momentum vector?] 2.2.2.2 inelastic scattering [nonlinear transfer of momentum to the medium (Earth)] 3. Neutrino Oscillation Observations 3.1 Source - Detector Distances 3.1.1 Oscillation phase must be well defined If just momentum or energy were conserved, we could assume one of them constant, and let v (or u2) vary inversely with mass expectancy. But both are conserved for a free particle, which leads to the v and u2 paradox (below). So, for a free particle, if m varies, then we should assume v doesn't. Therefore the oscillation phase can be well defined (within quantum uncertainty), because with v not varying much, the mass expectancy may change accurately according to theory (calculated) distance.J. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 7 Along these lines of reasoning, the more relativistic the neutrino, the more the mass determines the kinematics, because of the Lorentz scaling of mass (but not of velocity). 4. Vacuum Oscillation Theory 4.1 Usual: Based on Analogy to CKM As in [8*], Chapter 7, ignoring time-evolution and viewing the problem strictly in terms of distance x from the neutrino initial (creation) point, we write the flavor state as a function of detector distance x in terms of the mixing matrix /c116 V and the mass state (mass- eigenstate state vector): () ()/c114 /c116 /c114fx m x=×V , with () ()mx xmjj j”y ; or, (4.1.1) () ()f f fxVVV VVV VVVm m mxee e e m tmmm tttæ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷=Ø ºŒ ŒŒø ßœ œœ×æ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷123 123 1231 2 3() () ()=Ø ºŒ ŒŒø ßœ œœ×æ Łç ç çö ł÷ ÷ ÷VVV VVV VVVxm xmxmeee123 123 12311 22 33mmm ttty y y. (4.1.2) We note that the mass expectancy, () ()mxmxjj , as a function of distance, is what is supposed to cause observation of the atmospheric muon neutrino deficit as a change in flavor expectancy according to formula (4.1.1). Formulas for mixing as a function ofdistance have been derived in terms of the mass eigenstate mass difference,J. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 8 Dmm mij i j=- () () () () =-mxmx mxmxii jj . We note here that because the variance of a difference of random variables is equal to the variance of the sum, the Heisenberg uncertainty involved in the mass difference terms in such formulas is not different in anyessential way from the uncertainty in the mass state itself, as above. A few examples of (4.1.2):For no mixing and therefore no oscillation, () ()f f fxV V Vm m mxee m tm tæ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷=Ø ºŒ ŒŒø ßœ œœ×æ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷1 2 31 2 300 0000 ; or, equivalently, (4.1.3) ()f f fxm m me m tæ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷=Ø ºŒ ŒŒø ßœ œœ×æ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷100 0100011 2 3Þ=/c114 /c114fm . (4.1.4) For maximal mixing [8*, (7.50)], () ()f f fxe e eem m mxe ii iim tpp ppæ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷=--Ø ºŒ ŒŒø ßœ œœ×æ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷11 1 11 23 43 43 231 2 3. (4.1.5) For an exact analogy to Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark mixing [9*, (2.16)], () ()f f fxm m mxe m tæ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷=Ø ºŒ ŒŒø ßœ œœ×æ Łç ççö ł÷ ÷÷098 022 0003 022 097 004 0008 004 0991 2 3... ... .. .. (4.1.6) 4.2 Superposition 4.2.1 Difference between Superposition and Interaction Young-type superposition is not possible for neutrinos, which are supposed to propagate as trios of mass eigenstates not confined to short distances. This is because ofthe small source aperture relative to propagation distance (Heisenberg). [Figure showing transverse uncertainty & range of the weak force][Interaction: e. g., binding energy] 4.3 Free Propagation Requirements are: • nonvirtuality (eigenstates must be real particles, not virtual)J. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 9 • binding interaction, for nonelementary particles (ignored in osc theory) • conservation of energy, momentum, and therefore mass Contrast the quark sector, in which the particles never are free; always a local field, by gluon exchange (Strong) and photon exchange (Coulomb). 4.3.1.1 v and v2 paradoxJ. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 10 4.3.1.2 Uncertainty Principle not valid--commutator 5. Vacuum Oscillation Theory, Revised 5.1 Based on proper-time energy progression • Neutrinos have energy substructure • Neutrinos are massive • Neutrino oscillations involve energy eigenstatesJ. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 11 5.2 Neutrino initial and final interactions have substructure 5.3 Most of Usual Expression of Mixing data is Preserved [show translation to mix-angle vs. Dm phase space] Note: This paper complicates the theory for neutrino oscillations and shows that the usual kind of vacuum oscillation is not possible. Therefore, it weakens the argument thatneutrinos might be massive. 6. References ([*] to be renumbered) [1] P. E. Kraght, "Atmosphere (Earth)", p. 216 in D. M. Considine, Ed., Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia (5th ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, San Francisco, 1976. [1*] S. Kasuga, "Observation of a small uume Ratio of Atmospheric Neutrinos in Super- Kamiokande by the Method of Particle Identification, Doctoral Thesis, University of Tokyo, 1998. KEK Preprint Archives, U. Tokyo. [2*] M. Shiozawa, Measurements of Atmospheric Neutrinos in the Super-Kamiokande Detector, June 1998. KEK Preprint Archives, U. Tokyo. [3*] Y. Koshio, Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande, KEK preprint, Fig. 5 (1998-03- 05). [4*] P. Lipari, T. Stanev, and T. K. Gaisser, Geomagnetic Effects on Atmospheric Neutrinos, arXiv , astro-ph/9803093 (1998).J. M. Williams 2000-07-26 v. 0.3 12 [5*] T. K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, Pathlength Distributions of Atmospheric Neutrinos, arXiv , astro-ph/9708147 (1997). [6*] T. K. Gaisser, et al, Comparison of Atmospheric Neutrino Flux Calculations at Low Energy, arXiv , hep-ph/9608253 (1996). [7*] Y. Ne'Eman and Y. Kirsch, The Particle Hunters (2nd ed) p. 123. New York: Cambridge University Press (1996). [8*] C. W. Kim and A. Pevsner, Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics , Chapter 7. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers (1993). [9*] Y. Nir, "Flavor Physics and CP Violation", arXiv , hep-ph/9810520 (1998)..

arXiv:physics/0007079v1 [physics.optics] 26 Jul 2000Polarization Elements–A Group Theoretical Study Sudha and A.V.Gopala Rao Department of Studies in Physics University of Mysore Manasagangothri Mysore 570 006 Abstract The classification of polarization elements, the polarizat ion affecting optical devices which have a Jones-matrix representation, according to the type of eig envectors they possess, is given a new visit through the Group-Theoretical connection of polariz ation elements. The diattenuators and retarders are recognized as the elements corresponding to b oosts and rotations, respectively. The structure of homogeneous elements other than diattenuator s and retarders are identified by giving the quaternion corresponding to these elements. The set of d egenerate polarization elements is identified with the so called ‘null’ elements of the Lorentz G roup. Singular polarization elements are examined in their more illustrative Mueller matrix repr esentation and finally the eigenstructure of a special class of singular Mueller matrices is studied. Key words: Homogeneous, Inhomogeneous, Degenerate polarization ele ments, Eigenpolarization, Lorentz Group, Quaternions, Singular Mueller matrices 1 Introduction It is well known that [1, 2] polarization elements are charac terized by the types of eigenpolarization that they possess. Homogeneous polarization elements are the ones which possess orthogonal eigenpolariza- tion whereas inhomogeneous polarization elements possess non-orthogonal eigenpolarizations. Here we refer to a polarization element as a polarizing optical device which has got the Jones matrix or the 2×2 matrix representation. Also, the term eigenpolarization refers to the eigenvectors of the associated Jones matrix, the states which are unchanged in polarizatio n by the action of the corresponding Jones device matrix. There is another class of polarization eleme nts that are called degenerate polarization elements. They are the ones which possess only one linearly i ndependent eigenpolarization. Though the connection between the Lorentz group and polariz ation elements is well known [3, 4, 5, 6], little has been done in exploiting the known propertie s of the Lorentz group in identifying the homogeneous, inhomogeneous and degenerate elements. Ours is an attempt towards this end and by achieving this, we hope to have lessened the jargon to those w ho are familiar with Group Theory. We recall here the connection between the set of all non-sing ular polarization elements and the Lorentz group [4]. A non-singular pure Mueller matrix is of the form kL where L is an element belonging to the Orthochronous Proper Lorentz Group (OPLG) SO(3,1), w ithkbeing any positive real number. 1Though the connection is always stated in terms of 4 ×4 representation of the polarizing optical devices, the so called Mueller matrix representation, and the group S O(3,1), the connection between the 2 ×2 matrix representation of the device (Jones representation ) and the group SL(2,C) is obvious through the homomorphism between the groups SL(2,C) and SO(3,1). In fact, there is a one-to-many mapping between the set of all SL(2,C) matrices and the set of all Jone s matrices, a Jones matrix being just a complex scalar times a SL(2,C) matrix. This being the case, a classification of SL(2,C) into homogeneous and inhomogeneous elements gives us the corresponding clas sification of non-singular Jones matrices. 2 Classification of elements of SL(2,C) on the basis of their eigenvectors We know that among the elements of SL(2,C), we have those elem ents which are unitary and hence correspond to the subgroup SU(2) of SL(2,C). The elements of SU(2) written in their quaternionic [7] representation1are given by Tr=/parenleftbigg q0−iq3−iq1−q2 −iq1+q2q0+iq3/parenrightbigg (2. 1) where q0,q1,q2andq3are all real and q·q=q2 0+q2 1+q2 2+q2 3= 1. It is very easy to notice that Trhas got two eigenvalues λ=q0±/radicalbig q2 0−1 and owing to the relations [7] q0= cosθ 2,qi=aisinθ 2 (i= 1,2,3),ˆa·ˆa= 1, where ˆa={a1, a2, a3}is a real (unit) vector, we have λ1,2= exp ±iθ 2. The eigenvectors of Trbelonging to these eigenvalues are found to be X1=/parenleftbigg1 a1+ia2 a3−1/parenrightbigg ;X2=/parenleftbigg1 a1+ia2 a3+1/parenrightbigg (2. 2) which satisfy X† 1X2=0. Thus it is clear that all 2 ×2 unitary matrices, which are a complex scalar times that of the elements of the group SU(2), are homogeneou s polarization elements. These are the so called rotators which is obviously so because of the known homomorphism betw een the group SU(2) and the subgroup 1 ⊕R3of the group SO(3,1) with R3∈SO(3). Similarly we consider another important set of elements bel onging to SL(2,C). These are the 2 ×2 matrices (of unit determinant) which are hermitian and are r epresented in terms of a (unit) quaternion q= (q0,/vectorq) as Tb=/parenleftbiggq0−iq3−iq1−q2 −iq1+q2q0+iq3/parenrightbigg (2. 3) withq0real and q1,q2,q3being purely imaginary. The eigenvectors of this matrix are found to be λ=q0±/radicalbig q2 0−1 and owing to the relations [7] q0= coshθb 2,qi=nisinhθb 2,i= 1,2,3 we have λ1,2= exp ±θb 2. The eigenvalues of this matrix are given by X′ 1=/parenleftbigg1 n1+in2 n3+1/parenrightbigg ;X′ 2=/parenleftbigg1 n1+in2 n3−1/parenrightbigg (2. 4) where ˆn={n1, n2, n3}is a real unit vector and X′ 1,X′ 2are mutually orthogonal. We thus have no hesitation in concluding that all hermitian 2 ×2 matrices are homogeneous. The angle θbis called the boost angle because of the homomorphism that exists between hermitian elements of SL(2,C) and the set of all boost matrices belonging to the group SO(3,1). The ele ments of the group SO(3,1) corresponding to the hermitian elements of the group SL(2,C) being given by Mb=A(Tb⊗T∗ b)A−1;A= 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 −1 0 1 1 0 0i−i0 , (2. 5) 1The quaternions are mathematical objects of the form q=q1e1+q2e2+q3e3+q0≡/vectorqe+q0where e1,e2ande3 are symbols called the quaternion units satisfying the relations e2 i=−1,(i= 1,2,3),eiej=ek(i/negationslash=j/negationslash=kandi, j, k cyclic. The quaternions over the field of complex numbers are called complex quaternions and they form a group under multiplication. A detailed discussion on quaternions and h ow they form a representation of the Lorentz group can be found in [7] 2the Stokes vectors corresponding to the eigenvectors X′ 1andX′ 2are respectively given by S′ 1=A(X′ 1⊗X′∗ 1) ={1, n3, n1, n2},S′ 2=A(X′ 2⊗X′∗ 2) ={1,−n3,−n1,−n2}. (2. 6) S′ 1andS′ 2being the eigenvectors of Mbcorresponding to the eigenvalues exp θband exp( −θb) respec- tively, the reason why these matrices are called diattenuat ors is obvious. They transmit the orthogonal vectors (orthogonal in the usual sense, not in the Minkowski sense) S′ 1andS′ 2with different amounts of absorption (exp θbforS′ 1and exp( −θb) forS′ 2). For the sake of completeness, we write down the Stokes vectors S1andS2corresponding to the orthogonal eigenpolarizations X1,X2ofTr. They are, S1={1,−a3,−a1,−a2}andS2={1, a3, a1, a2}, (2. 7) and it is to be noted that whereas X1∈expθ/2 and X2∈exp(−θ/2), the Stokes vectors S1and S2belong to the eigenvalues (doubly repeated) 1 ,1 ofMr. The remaining two eigenvectors S3and S4ofMrbelonging to the eigenvalues exp iθ, exp(−iθ) can be seen to be complex 4-vectors thus not corresponding to physical light beams. Similarly the eigen vectors S′ 3andS′ 4belonging to the doubly repeated eigenvalues 1 ,1 of the boost matrix do not correspond to physical light beam s as both of them are not Minkowskian vectors. Having thus arrived at the conclusions that rotation and boo st matrices are the homogeneous polar- ization elements having orthogonal eigenvectors, we now wi sh to see which other elements of the Lorentz group correspond to homogeneous polarization elements. To make this examination, we find it useful to recall the well-known polar decomposition theorem [8] re alised in the case of the group SL(2,C). We notice that any element Tof the group SL(2,C) can be written as a product of a boost matr ixTb(or T′ b)and a rotation matrix Tras shown below. T=TrTb=T′ bTr (2. 8) The eigenvectors belonging to TrandTbrespectively being given by equation (2.2) and (2.4), it is n ot difficult to see that for Tto possess orthogonal eigenvectors, one should have ˆa=ˆn. Also, by using the quaternionic representation of the Lorentz group, one c an very easily get at the general form of the polarization element possessing orthogonal eigenpola rizations. Since the quaternions corresponding toTr,Tbare, respectively, qr=/parenleftbig cosθr 2,ˆasinθr 2/parenrightbig andqb=/parenleftbig coshθb 2, iˆnsinhθb 2/parenrightbig , by using the rule of multiplication of quaternions and using the condition ˆa=ˆn, we get at the quaternion qcorresponding toT, which is homogeneous. It is given by q=qrqb;q= (q0,/vectorq); q0= cosθr 2coshθb 2−isinθr 2sinhθb 2, (2. 9) /vectorq=/parenleftbigg cosθr 2sinhθb 2+ sinθr 2coshθb 2/parenrightbigg ˆa. One can very easily see that when θr= 0,qgiven above reduces to qb, the quaternion corresponding to a boost and when θb= 0,qreduces to qr, the quaternion corresponding to a rotation. When both θrand θbare non-zero, the quaternion which obeys (2.9) is the one cor responding to the general homogeneous polarization element. At this stage, an observation regard ing the classification of the group SO(3,1) depending on the geometic structure its elements possess, m ay be in order. We recall that [7] if an element L= exp( S) of SO(3,1), where Sis the so-called infinitisimal transformation matrix ofL, has an additional structure with S≡Y/tildewideX−X/tildewideY;/tildewideXY= 0, X,Ybeing Minkowski 4-vectors, then it is called a planar Lorentz transformation. All other elements of SO(3,1) which do not have their corresponding Sin the form given above are called non-planar Lorentz transformations. A corresponding classification o f the group SL(2,C), though this classification is significant mostly in the 4 ×4 representation of the Lorentz group, is obvious. Also, dep ending on the 4-vector character of the vectors XandY, we have the so-called [7] rotation-like ,nulland boost-like planar transformations. The quaternions corresponding to planar and non-planar Lorentz transformations have been identified [7] and it is seen that ‘ rotations’ and ‘boosts’ which are identified 3to be homogeneous polarization elements are respectively s pecial cases of ‘rotation-like’ and ‘boost-like’ Lorentz transformations [7]. But it is interesting to note t hatnone of the other planar transforma- tions are homogeneous . This can be seen by observing that the quaternions correspo nding to planar Lorentz transformations have q0real as the only general condition on them, with their other q uater- nion components q1,q2andq3being permitted to take any values subject to the condition q·q= 1. A careful observation of equation (2.9) reveals that the qua ternions corresponding to planar Lorentz transformations do not coincide with the form of the quatern ion given in that equation (equation (2.9)) for any value of θrandθbexcept when either θr= 0 or θb= 0. The situations in equation (2.9) when θb= 0 corresponding to the quaternion representing a rotation and the other situation when θr= 0 corresponding to the quaternion representing a boost, our a ssertion made above is proved. Thus, with the set of all homogeneous elements in the Lorentz group bein g identified by equation (2.9), it containing planar Lorentz transformations only in the form of rotation s and boosts, the remaining elements corre- sponding to non-planar Lorentz transformations, we can con clude that planar Lorentz transformations with the exception of rotations and boosts are either inhomg eneous or degenerate polarization elements. In the following we try to identify the set of all degenerate p olarization elements in the Lorentz group. 2.1 Non-singular Degenerate Polarization elements We start with checking the so called nullelements [7] of the Lorentz group for their ‘degenerate’ ness. The null elements of the Lorentz group are the ones which have their corresponding quaternion as qn= (q0,/vectorq);q2 1+q2 2+q2 3+q2 0= 1, q2 1+q2 2+q2 3= 0. (2. 10) One can easily check that for all elements of the Lorentz grou p having the quaternion of the above form, the number 1 appears as the doubly degenerate eigenvalue. Th e eigenvector belonging to this doubly repeated eigenvalue can be seen to be X0=/parenleftbigg1 −iq1 iq2+q3/parenrightbigg , (2. 11) thus taking the null elements Tninto the class of degenerate polarization elements. None of the other elements of the Lorentz group are degenerate as evidenced by the fact that only the null elements of the group have doubly degenerate eigenvalues. This result and t he discussions made hitherto make it clear that the ‘null’ elements of the Lorentz group are the only non -singular degenerate polarization elements (apart from a scale factor). Having thus identified the disjoint sets of the Lorentz group corresponding to homogeneous and degenerate polarization elements, we ca n now conclude that all other elements of the Lorentz group belong to the class of inhomogeneous pol arization elements. Or to put it more simply, the elements of the Lorentz group which have the corr esponding quaternions other than the ones mentioned in equations (2.9) and (2.10), correspond to inhomogeneous polarization elements. It is worthwhile to point out here that all the examples of inh omogeneous and degenerate polariza- tion elements that are quoted in [2] are singular elements th ough there is a whole lot of non-singular inhomogeneous as well as degenerate polarization elements as we have pointed out here. In Table 1 we give a few illustrative examples of homogeneous, inhomogen eous and degenerate polarization elements which are non-singular. 3 Singular Mueller matrices Having till now studied the eigenstructure and hence the cla ssification of non-singular polarization elements, we now seek to determine the eigenstructure of sin gular polarization elements. It is to be noted here that a class of the widely studied and used polariz ing optical devices, the so called polarizers and analyzers2are singular. Thus it is worthwhile to study their eigenstru cture and eventually classify 2For a discussion on polarizers and analyzers, see [9, 10]. 4them on that basis. Here we wish to work in the 4 ×4 representation of the devices only as it is convenient mathematically for the task we have on hand. We recall that singular pure Mueller matrices have the form M=m00X/tildewideYG,where X={1, x, y, z };/tildewideXGX = 0, Y={1,−p,−q,−r};/tildewideYGY = 0,andG= diag(1 ,−1,−1,−1). (3. 1) It can be seen that matrices of the form M=m00X/tildewideYGpossess the following eigenvalues λ1=m00(1 +px+qy+rz), λ2= 0,0,0. (3. 2) Thus, there are only two distinct eigenvalues for Mof the form (3.1) in general and a quadruply repeated eigenvalue λ= 0 in the case where X=Y. Correspondingly, in general, there are two eigenvectors S1=X∈λ1andS2=Y∈λ2, the case of there being only one eigenvector Y∈λ=0getting realized when X=Y. Since /tildewideS1S2=/tildewideXYis the analogue of the expression X† 1X2, where X1andX2 are the eigenvectors of the Jones matrix corresponding to Min equation (3.1), singular pure Mueller matrices fall into the class of homogeneous, inhomogeneous or degerate polarization elements depending on the vectors X=S1andY=S2on which they are built. They are homogeneous when /tildewideXY= 0, inhomogeneous when /tildewideXY/ne}ationslash= 0 and degenerate when X=Y. In Table 2, we give few examples of homogeneous, inhomogeneous and degenerate polarization e lements which are singular. One can also see [2] for several examples of singular inhomogeneous pola rization elements. Though we do not have corresponding Jones matrices for singu lar Mueller matrices other than the ones mentioned in equation (3.1), we find it worthwhile to exa mine the eigenstructure of a special class Mof singular Mueller matrices which have the same structure a s that of the singular pure Mueller matrices, but the 4-vector character of the composite vecto rsXandYare different from that of singular pure Mueller matrices. We have three cases to consi der depending on the choices possible for the 4-vectors XandY. (i) Here M1∈ Mis of the form M1=m00X/tildewideYG,where /tildewideXGX = 0, /tildewideYGY >0,andG= diag(1 ,−1,−1,−1). (3. 3) It is easy to see that this matrix has only one non-zero eigenv alueλ1=m00(1 +px+qy+rz) its corresponding eigenvector being S1=X. The eigenvectors corresponding to its triply repeated zero eigenvalue λ2= 0 can be seen to be non-Stokes. It may be of some interest to no te that this matrix is the so called generalized polarizer matrix [9]. (ii) Consider a 4 ×4 matrix M2where M2=m00X/tildewideYG;/tildewideXGX >0, /tildewideYGY = 0,andG= diag(1 ,−1,−1,−1). (3. 4) This matrix also possesses only one non-zero eigenvalue It i s easy to notice that M2has a structure equivalent to that of the transpose of M1. It has got two eigenvalues λ1/ne}ationslash= 0 and λ2= 0 and the corresponding eigenvectors are S1=X∈λ1,S2=Y∈λ2= 0. The form of the above matrix itself suggests that it belongs to the so called generalized analyzer matrix [9]. (iii) The only other remaining possibility in the choice of XandYbeing /tildewideXGX >0 and /tildewideYGY >0, we have M3=m00X/tildewideYG;/tildewideXGX >0, /tildewideYGY >0,andG= diag(1 ,−1,−1,−1). (3. 5) On the same lines of that of the previous two cases, we can see t hat the matrix M3has two distinct eigenvalues, a non-zero eigenvalue λ1and a zero eigenvalue λ2= 0. The only eigenvector corresponding to λ1isXwhereas the eigenvectors belonging to the triply repeated e igenvalue λ2= 0 are all seen to be non-Stokes vectors and thus not qualifyi ng to be called eigenpolarizations. 5We wish to make an observation here on the importance of study ing the eigenstructre of Mueller matrices. The eigenvector which correspond to a real eigenv alue of a given Mueller matrix represents the physical light beam that comes out undisturbed by the pol arizing optical device represented by the Mueller matrix and hence a study of the eigenstructure of Mue ller matrices, at least in the cases possible, is welcome for understanding the nature of the optical devic es represented by them. In fact, the singular Mueller matrices that we have studied here is one class of Mue ller matrices whose eigenstructure can be studied quite easily. But there still remain a whole lot of Mueller matrices, singular as well as non-singular, which remain to be examined for their eigenst ructure. Among the class of non-singular Mueller matrices, we have carried out a study of the pure Muel ler matrices which are elements of the Lorentz group (apart from a scale factor) and are in pursuit o f other non-singular Mueller matrices which are accessible for a study of their eigenstructure. Acknowledgements One of the authors, Dr. Sudha thanks the CSIR for the financial support in the form of Research Fellowship. References [1] Shurcliff W. A., Polarized Light, production and use , 1962, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts [2] Shih-Yau Lu and Russell A. Chipman, J.Opt.Soc.Am.A , 1994, 11, pp. 766–773 [3] Barakat R., Opt. Commun. , 1981, 38, p. 159 [4] van der Mee C.V.M., J. Math. Phys. , 1993, 34, pp. 5072–88 [5] Sridhar R and Simon R., J. Mod. Opt. , 1994, 41, pp. 1903–1915 [6] Cloude S.R., Optik, 1986, 75, pp. 26–36 [7] Srinivasa Rao K.N., Linear Algebra and Group Theory for Physicists , 1996, (New York: John Wiley) [8] Lancaster P., and Tismenetsky., The Theory of Matrices , 2nd ed. 1985, Academic Press, San Diego, California [9] Dr. Sudha, Some Algebraic Aspects of Relativity and Polarization Opti cs, Ph.D. Thesis submitted to the University of Mysore, 1998. [10] Shih-Yau Lu and Russell A. Chipman, J.Opt.Soc.Am.A. , 1996, 13, pp. 1106–1113 6Table 1: Non-singular Polarization Elements Type of polarization Example 1 Example 2 element 1√ 2/parenleftbigg√ 2−i1−√ 2i 1−√ 2i√ 2−i/parenrightbigg 1 2/parenleftbigg2−3i−2√ 3−√ 3i 2√ 3 +√ 3i 2−3i/parenrightbigg Homogeneous X1=1√ 2{1,−1};X2=1√ 2{1,1}X1=1√ 2{1,−i};X2=1√ 2{1, i} /parenleftbigg−i−1−2i 1 2 + i/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg2 +√ 3 0 2(1−i) 2−√ 3/parenrightbigg Inhomogeneous X1=1√ 2{1,−1};X2=√ 5√ 6{1,−1 1+2i}X1=√ 3√ 5{1,1−i√ 3};X2={0,1} /parenleftbigg −i1−i 1−i2 +i/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg 1 0 2(1−i) 1/parenrightbigg Degenerate X1=X2=1√ 2{1, i}; X1=X2={0,1}; Table 2: Singular Polarization Elements Type of polarization Example 1 Example 2 element /parenleftbigg1 1 1 1/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg0 0 0 1/parenrightbigg Homogeneous X1=1√ 2{1,1};X2=1√ 2{1,−1}X1={0,1};X2={1,0} /parenleftbigg 1i 1i/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg 1 0 1 0/parenrightbigg Inhomogeneous X1=1√ 2{1,1};X2=1√ 2{1, i}X1=1√ 2{1,1};X2={0,1} /parenleftbigg1−1 1−1/parenrightbigg /parenleftbigg0 1 0 0/parenrightbigg Degenerate X1=X2=1√ 2{1,1}; X1=X2={1,0}; 7

DEVELOPMENT OF REBUNCHING CAVITIES AT IAP C. P. Welsch, K.-U. Kühnel, A. Schempp Institut für Angewandte Physik Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Abstract A focus of work at IAP has been the development and optimization of spiral loaded cavities since the 1970s [A. Schempp et al, NIM 135, 409 (1976)]. These cavities feature a high efficiency, a compact design and a big variety of possible fields of application. They find use both as bunchers and post accelerators to vary the final energy of the beam. In comparison to other available designs, the advantage of these structures lies in their small size. Furthermore they can easily be tuned to the required resonance frequency by varying the length of the spiral. Due to the small size of the cavities the required budget can also be kept low. Here, two slightly different types of spiral loaded cavities, which were built for the REX-ISOLDE project at CERN and the intensity upgrade program at GSI are being discussed. 1 COMMON FEATURES 1.1 General Remarks Large Accelerator facilities very often need to be highly flexible in terms of final energy and the particles to be accelerated. With long linear accelerators – like Alvarez or Wideröe structures – alone, the necessary energy variations cannot be attained. Therefore, single resonators are very often used. They allow changing the energy of the particles as well as the velocity distribution of the beam. Fig. 1: Schematic Drawing of spiral loaded cavity In a cylindrical external tank one or more spiral arms are placed. At their open end each spiral carries a drift tube running along the symmetry axis of the cavity and thus forming several accelerating gaps. Different designs of the spiral arms are possible, depending on the required resonance frequency. With Splitring structures resonance frequencies of up to XXX MHz can be achieved, whereas archimedic type spirals find their application at resonance frequencies as low as 27 MHz. 1.2 Characteristic Parameters The transittime factor T indicates the flexibility of an accelerator as the quotient of the effectively experienced voltage and the total gap voltage. The R p-value is defined as the effective cavity voltage squared over the power P put into the cavity. PURUUT2 .Cav,eff p totGap,eff= = With n as the number of gaps, the Rp-value is proportional to n2 in case of the single-spiral structure and proportional to n for a splitring structure. The transittime factor is the product of a velocity dependent and a geometry based term [1] ()() ()() /Gf7/Gf7 /Gf8/Gf6 /Ge7/Ge7 /Ge8/Ge6 ⋅−⋅⋅⋅−⋅⋅⋅=/Gf7/Gf7 /Gf8/Gf6 /Ge7/Ge7 /Ge8/Ge6⋅/Gf7/Gf7 /Gf8/Gf6 /Ge7/Ge7 /Ge8/Ge6 ⋅⋅⋅ += βββπ ββπβλβπ λβπ πλβ 2nsinn2Ta2I1 r85,0sinr85,0dT 0 0V0G where d =width of acceleration gap r =radius of curvature of drifttubes (rout-rin) a =radius of aperture β0 =v0 / c; β = v / c v0 / v =reference / real velocity of particles Fig. 2 shows a plot of the velocity dependent term in case of the 36 MHz 11.4 MeV/u rebuncher built for GSI. The wide spectrum of possible applications is clearly shown in this plot. While many-gap structures are limited to a narrow energy interval, a 2- or 3-gap accelerator can handle even particles with a large deviation from the design energy. This flexibility is characteristic for all of the here presented structures. Figure 2: velocity depend term of the transittime factor The resonance frequency of the structures can also be determined from the geometrical dimensions alone [2]. Without going into the details, it should be mentioned that it is possible to describe a spiral loaded cavity as a transission line loaded with capacitors or as a set of capacitors and inductors. Their values can be calculated analytically with a high accuracy. Fig. 3 shows the calculated capacity C at each mm of the 36 MHz 11.4 MeV/u spiral in the transfer channel at GSI. Figure 3: capacity C between spiral arm and tank In addition to these analytical calculations, all of the above parameters, the quality factor Q and the shunt impedance η are determined with the MAFIA program. Using the obtained field distributions, optimisation of the structures is done. 2 THE INTENSITY UPGRADE PROGRAM AT GSI It is the goal of the intensity upgrade program at GSI to fill the SIS up to its space charge limit. This requires a beam current of up to 15 emA (238U4+), which could not be delivered by the earlier system. Therefore the old wideroe structure was replaced by an RFQ and two IH-structures, especially designed to accelerate high intensity, low charge state beams. Special attention had to be paid in the two stripping sections, where high space charge effects are present and focussing elements in both transverse and longitudinal direction are necessary. quadrupole dublett gas stripper 15° bending magnet charge state analyzer 30° bending magnet 15° bending magnet rebuncher (36 MHz) rebuncher (108 MHz)45° bending magnet quadrupole 30° bending magnet 15° bending magnet quadrupole dublett quadrupole triplett AlvarezIH structure quadrupole dublett from HLI Figure 4: part of the UNILAC Even though an 108 MHz Rebuncher was already present in the section in front of the Alvarez-linac, it was necessary to counteract the longitudinal defocusing effects. The resonance frequency was chosen to be 36 MHz, like the frequency in the HSI, providing a larger region of linear forces. Figure 5: View inside 36 MHz 1.4 MeV/u rebuncher This low frequency and the limited space available required a compact structure. Two spirals with constant pitch ("archimedic type") were chosen, shown in Fig. 5. Mechanical stability was guaranteed by fixing each spiral with two additional copper tubes on each side. Figure 6: distribution of electric field along axis A number of simulations was done to optimise the particle motion through the buncher [2,3]; always taking into account the various kinds of different ions that are going to be used at GSI. Fig 6 shows the distribution of the electric field along the beam axis. Since the gap in the middle of the structure is as wide as the outer ones, its field shows double the amplitude. Both resonators are already integrated into the GSI beamline and are successfully operated. 3 REBUNCHER FOR REX-ISOLDE REX-ISOLDE (Radioactive Beam Experiment at ISOLDE) is a new project at the online mass separator ISOLDE / CERN [4]. The structure of exotic and neutron rich nuclei, especially Na, Mg, K and Ca, will be studied. The nuclei have to reach energies in the order of the coulomb barrier. By measuring the arising γ-rays both, static and dynamic properties of these hardly known nuclei can be examined. Figure 7: Part of the REX-ISOLDE beamline In order to accelerate the radioactive beam to the necessary energy, a combination of an ion source, penning trap, charge state breeder, an RFQ, an IH-structure and a 7-gap resonator is used. The longitudinal match is achieved by inserting a rebuncher between RFQ and IH. Short cavities allow an energy variation between 0.8 MeV/u - 2.2 MeV/u. Figure 8: calculated field distribution For the rebunching cavities 0- and π-mode have to be separated. Furthermore, the electric field must be kept in reasonable dimensions in order to avoid sparking. The calculated temperature distribution indicates whether additional cooling is necessary. An effective power of 2 kW is put into the structure, that is working successfully, too. Figure 9: View into open splitring cavity The rebuncher for REX-ISOLDE is integrated in a beamline in Munich and also operated successfully. REFERENCES [1] J. Häuser, “Eigenschaften von Spiralresonatoren”, thesis, University of Frankfurt, 1989 [2] C. Welsch “Aufbau und Untersuchung von Spiralresonatoren für den Hochstrominjektor der GSI“, Diplomarbeit, University of Frankfurt, 1999, http://www.carsten-welsch.net [3] W. Barth et al, “High Current Beam Dynamics for the Upgraded UNILAC”, PAC, Vancouver, 1997 [4] K.U. Kühnel „Aufbau eines Splitringresonators als Rebuncher für das REX-ISOLDE Projekt“, Diplomarbeit, University of Frankfurt, 1999

MEASUREMENT OF THE TEMPORAL RESPONSE OF FERROELETRIC PHOTOCATHODES M. Castellano, M. Ferrario, F. Tazzioli, INFN-LNF; L. Catani, INFN-ROMA2; L. Giannessi, ENEA-CRE, I. Boscolo, S. Cialdi, M. Valentini, University and INFN Milano. Abstract Various photoemissive materials, among which ferroelectric ceramics are tested as photo emitters at INFN Frascati Laboratories. In order to understand the physical processes involved in the emission and to characterize them as photocathodes for use in linac injectors, it is important to measure the temporal shape of the emitted current. As the duration of the laser pulse is 25 ps, the required resolution is of the order of few ps. An apparatus has been set up for the purpose, consisting of a 30 kV electron gun, a microwave transverse deflecting cavity which translates the temporal distribution of the electron bunch into a spatial one, a fluorescent screen on which the deflected beam traces a sector of a circle and various focusing and charge measuring items. The image on the screen is detected via a CCD camera and a frame grabber. We describe the performance of the apparatus and some preliminary temporal distribution measurements. 1 INTRODUCTION The measurement of the time correlation between laser pulse and emitted current from a photocathode is important to characterize the cathode itself and the suitability of the generated electron pulse for further acceleration in injectors. In our case the photon pulse is obtained from a mode locked Nd-Yag laser and has a duration of 25 ps. The cathodes to be tested are made of either ferroelectric PLZT ceramics [1] or doped Diamond [2]. The ceramics are expected to exhibit a multiphoton response starting from the green wavelength range (532 nm) while the diamond samples start emitting in the UV range. The measuring system has been initially set up forthe green light (second harmonic of the laser) but can be readily adapted to UV radiation. The ceramic cathodes are disks of 16 mm diameter, 0.7 to 1 mm thickness, provided with a uniform metallic film electrode on the rear side and with a grating interconnected by an external ring on the front (emitting) side. This configuration allows theapplication of a bias to improve the emission efficiency [3]. For the same reason the sample can also be heated by a resistive wire. The cathodes are rugged and need no special precautions in handling. The vacuum requirements are dictated by the high voltage used in the gun.2 EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM The bunch length is measured by a known technique [4] similar to that used in streak cameras. The beam, generated by photo excitation and accelerated to about 30 keV in a DC gun, is deflected by two sinusoidal crossed magnetic fields, in time quadrature with each other, which impress a transverse momentum to the various slices of the bunch. The image seen on a fluorescent screen downstream of the deflector is a sector of a circle whose length, divided by the full circumference, gives directly the bunch length in units of the RF period. A sketch of the system is shown in Fig.1. CADC S SCREEN CAMERAM L Figure 1: Measuring system. C=cathode,L=laser beam, M= mirror, A=anode, S=solenoid, DC= deflecting cavity. The deflecting fields are created by exciting the TM110 mode in a microwave resonator powered at 2450 MHz by two loop antennas spaced by 90 degrees on the azimuth. The loaded Q of the Aluminum cavity in matched condition is 5000 and the microwave power required to impart a deflection of 3 cm at a distance of 40 cm to a beam having an energy of 50 keV is 250 W for each antenna. The duration of the microwave pulse is determined by the jitter in the starting time of the laser pulse with respect to the trigger, which is about 4 µs. AnRF duration of 10 µs has been chosen. A sketch of the microwave system is shown in Fig. 2. The microwave signal does not need to be synchronized with the laser pulse because varying phases of the bunch with respect to the RF waveform produce only an azimuthshift of the image, which can be instantaneously grabbed pulse by pulse. This means that the microwave generator can be an oscillator (magnetron), which is much cheaper than a klystron amplifier. The diagnostic devices consist of the microwave cavity itself, a wall current monitor and a fluorescent ceramic screen plus a CCD camera with frame grabber. Thesignals induced in the monopole modes of the cavity can be used as a very sensitive indicator of the presence of the beam in the initial setting up of the instrument. The wall current monitor can be used to estimate the bunch charge and the bunch length of very long bunches (exceeding the RF period). Fig 2. Sketch of the microwave system. C= circulator, H= hybrid junction, PS= phase shifter, T= tuner, DC= directional coupler. 3 OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM The system has been set operating with green wavelength (532 nm). This makes laser beam alignment easier but brings serious problems of image detection because the emission efficiency of the ceramic cathodes at this wavelength is still very low. The laser signal to obtain tens of pC of bunch charge is of the order of milliJoules. The green light diffused by the cathodes illuminates the target and overwhelms the fluorescence induced by the beam. We have solved this problem by introducing a low pass filter in front of the camera, taking advantage of the fact that the Chromium doped ceramic employed emits substantially red light. In Fig. 3 is shown a picture of the beam taken with the frame grabber. Figure 3: Image of the beam on the screen. The shape of the image, for a continuous beam, should be an ellipse due to the screen being bent at 45 degrees withrespect to the electron beam axis, but can also be deformed by an imperfect balance of the two microwave channels. The resolution of the time measurement is given by the thickness of the trace which is mainly the dimension of the beam spot focused by the solenoid. The minimum dimension of the spot is determined by the beam emittance and space charge.In Fig. 4 is shown the image intensity distribution along the perimeter of the elliptical figure. Figure 4: Image intensity distribution. One notices that the beam trace fills the whole perimeter of the ellipse. This means that in this case the bunch length is very large. In fact due to the high power density of the laser beam (3 mJ on a laser spot of about 2mm diameter) the cathode surface is very close to breakdown. The image of the head of the bunch is superimposed to a periodic pedestal due to the tail of the bunch and to the imperfect balance of the sinusoidal deflecting fields. In order to see the perimeter partially filled (and therefore only one bump on the figure) one should decrease the laser power and beam intensity, but one cannot go below the sensitivity threshold of the ceramic screen. We plan to install a higher efficiency cathode and to employ an intensified camera. A long bunch can anyhow be useful to balance the deflecting fields by minimizing the pedestal bumps. It is to be noticed that with this system we measure the bunch length at the deflecting cavity location, which is at20 cm from the cathode. This length, for a given laser pulse length, depends on gun voltage and space charge. In Figures 5 and 6 are shown the evolutions of bunch lengthfrom the cathode to the deflection cavity for different bunch charges, as obtained with the HOMDYN code [5]. Space charge effects result in a bunch longer than the initial laser pulse length <L>=8 ps, even in the low charge limit of 1 pC. For the same reason we think that adirect measurement of the electron distribution exiting from the surface of the cathode is difficult by this technique, unless low charge and high voltage are applied, nevertheless one can obtain some useful information about the cathode temporal response by comparing measurements with computations.Oo 90oC HDC PSMicrowave generator T 0100020003000400050006000 - 101234567image intensity distribution along circumferenceintensity a.u. abscissa on perimeter (a.u.)Figure 5: Evolution of bunch length from cathode to deflector by 25 kV voltage applied. Maximum extracted charge in this case is 17 pC Figure 6: Evolution of bunch length from cathode to deflector by 50 kV voltage applied. Maximum extracted charge in this case is 33 pC. 4 CONCLUSIONS An instrument which is able to measure the bunch lengths of electrons emitted by a photocathode with a resolution of a few picoseconds has been successfully set operating. Only very preliminary results have been obtained but we plan to proceed in the near future to calibrate accurately the instrument and to perform bunch length measurements on the various rugged photocathodes that are being studied in our laboratory. AKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank the technicians L. Cacciotti and R. Sorchetti whose work has been essential to obtain these results.REFERENCES [1] A.Doria, I. Boscolo et al. "A robust and powerful green light photoemission source", Applied Physics Letters, Vol 74, N 6, Feb 1999.[2] I. Boscolo et al. "Diamond and Nd doped diamond photoemitters", Submitted to Optics Communications.[3] I. Boscolo et al., "Experiments on photoemission from ferroelectric ceramics", EPAC 2000- Vienna.[4] A.V. Alexandrov et al., "Experimental study of GaAs as a photoemitter", Physical Review E, Vol 51,N 2, Feb1995. [5] M. Ferrario, J. E. Clendenin, D. T. Palmer, J. B.Rosenzweig, L. Serafini, "HOMDYN Study For The LCLS RF Photo-Injector", Proc. of the 2nd ICFA Adv. Acc. Workshop on "The Physics of High Brightness Beams", UCLA, Nov., 1999, see also SLAC-PUB-8400.020406080100 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.225 KV 1 pC 10 pC 17 pC<L> [ps] Z_[m] 020406080100 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.250 KV 1 pC 10 pC 33 pC<L> [ps] Z_[m]

arXiv:physics/0007082v1 [physics.optics] 26 Jul 2000Strong Discontinuities in the Complex Photonic Band Struct ure of Transmission Metallic Gratings S. Collin, F. Pardo∗, R. Teissier and J.-L. Pelouard Laboratoire de Microstructures et Micro´ electronique, CN RS UPR20, 196 av. Henri Ravera, BP 107, 92225 Bagneux CEDEX, France (July 4, 2000) Complex photonic band structures (CPBS) of transmission me tallic gratings with rectangular slits are shown to exhibit strong discontinuities that are n ot evidenced in the usual energetic band structures. These discontinuities are located on Wood’s an omalies and reveal unambiguously two different types of resonances, which are identified as horizo ntal and vertical surface-plasmon reso- nances. Spectral position and width of peaks in the transmis sion spectrum can be directly extracted from CPBS for both kinds of resonances. Recently, metallic films with sub-wavelength apertures bec ame the subject of increasing interest. Experiments show that 2D arrays of sub-wavelength holes in metallic films can l ead to extraordinary transmission of light [1–5]. These properties have been attributed to the excitation of couple d surface-plasmons on the upper and lower surfaces of the grating. The ability of these structures to control light ha s been shown [6,7], and applications have already been proposed in order to exploit these properties in different fie lds, such as electromagnetic filters or photolithography. Electromagnetic calculations have been carried out by Port oet al. [8] in order to study the mechanisms that enhance the transmission of light through metallic grating s with very narrow slits. They distinguished two different mechanisms, that is the excitation of coupled surface plasm on polaritons on both surfaces of the metallic grating, and the coupling of incident plane waves with waveguide resonan ces located in the slits. They correspond respectively to surface-plasmon bands and flat bands in the energetic band st ructure. Similar resonances located in grooves have also been observed experimentally and numerically in the reflect ed light of metallic gratings [9–11]. Complex photonic band structures (CPBS) were previously ca lculated by Kuzmiak et al. for 2D periodic systems with metallic components [12], in order to obtain the attenu ation and the lifetime of each mode. CPBS allowed a splitting of the lifetime of degenerate modes at Brillouin- zone boundaries to be observed. In this Letter, we will show that, in the case of rectangular m etallic gratings, complex dispersion curves demonstrate the existence of a new kind of discontinuities. Much stronge r than for 2D periodic systems, they are located on Wood’s anomalies. They correspond to the transition between two di fferent types of resonances, identified as horizontal and vertical surface-plasmon resonances. The first one is a peri odic structure resonance, the second one is a Fabry- Perot like resonance. The discontinuity can be up to four ord ers of magnitude. Moreover, we will see on zero-order transmission spectra that the calculated complex frequenc ies are in excellent accordance not only with the spectral position, but also with the width of resonances’ peaks. Fig. 1 shows the structure studied in this Letter, which is si milar to the one of Porto et al. [8]. In the following, the period of the grating d= 3.5µm and the width of the slits a= 0.5µm will be kept constant, whereas the height hof the grating will vary. It is a symmetric structure, surrou nded with air. The metal is assumed to be gold, whose dielectric function is taken from the reference used by Port o [13]. Our calculations were carried out for the TM polarization (t he incident magnetic field is parallel to the direction y of the grating, see Fig. 1). They are based on the exact modal e xpansion in region II [14] and S-matrices formalism. In the upper and lower regions (I and III), the electromagnet ic field is expressed as superposition of plane waves e[i(k(n) xx±k(n) zz)−iωt](Rayleigh’s expansion). Their pure real wave vector compon entk(n) x, which represents the in-plane momentum of photons is given by Eq. (1): k(n) x=k(0) x+2πn d. (1) The two other terms k(n) zandωare complex quantities, according to the relation/parenleftBig k(n) x/parenrightBig2 +/parenleftBig k(n) z/parenrightBig2 = (ω/c)2. For the calculation of CPBS, we use a S-matrix formalism, in which the amplitude of the reflected an d transmitted diffracted waves are given by a matrix Sapplied to a vector containing the amplitude of the upper and lower incident waves. An electromagnetic mode is defined by the condition of the existence of a wave in the structure without any incident wave, which is equivalent to say that the inverse ( S−1) of the S-matrix has an eigenvalue that is null, with an eigenvector ( Rn, Tn), corresponding to an electromagnetic field in regions I and III: 1ΨI=/summationdisplay nRne[i(k(n) xx+k(n) zz)−iω0t],ΨIII=/summationdisplay nTne[i(k(n) xx−k(n) zz)−iω0t], (2) withℜ(ik(n) z)≤0. For a given kx=k(0) x, the electromagnetic modes are defined by complex frequenci esω0. The inverse of the imaginary part of the frequency provides the amplitude life time 2 τof the resonance [15,12], which can be associated to the dimensionless quality factor Q=ℜ(ω0)τ. The complex dispersion curves are lines in the three-dimens ional space defined by the complex frequency ω0of resonance modes and the parallel momentum of photons kx. For a more comprehensive representation we are plotting two projections of ω0, the energy E= ¯hℜ(ω0) and the dimensionless quality factor Q=ℜ(ω0)/(−2ℑ(ω0)). Fig. 2 shows the complex dispersion curves calculated for a h eight h= 1.4µm. The lines on the energetic band structure (Fig. 2(a)) represents the frontier of the Wood-R ayleigh’s anomalies. They correspond to the emergence (or the vanishing) of a diffracted wave in the region I or III, whic h wave is then at the grazing angle. These anomalies are observed on transmission spectra when the nthparallel wave vector k(n) x(given by Eq. (1)) is equal to the real incident wave vector k0. The energetic band structure in Fig. 2(a) shows two different types of modes, whose dispersion relations have already been studied by Porto. The bands located close to Wood’s anom alies, with slightly smaller energies, characterize horizontal surface-plasmon resonances. They are excited b y the first non-propagating (or evanescent) diffracted wave, and their quality factors are greater than 10 and up to more th an 104(see Fig. 2(b)). On the other hand, flat bands represent electromagnetic modes which are almost independ ent of the incident angle θ, and with lower quality factors (below 20). They were previously reported as waveguide reso nances [8]. We will justify further in this Letter why these resonances are more precisely vertical surface-plas mon resonances. The most remarkable result is given by the quality factor of t he upper energetic band, which is broken into three parts. Considering the point A in Fig. 2(a), we see that the en ergetic band is continuous whereas the quality factor’s curve is discontinuous at the corresponding point s A’ and A” in Fig. 2(b). On the left side of point A, the flat band corresponds to a vertical resonance with very low qu ality factors (of the order of 3), whereas the right side corresponds to an horizontal surface-plasmon resonance wi th high quality factors (up to more than 104). The lifetimes of the resonances are τ= 2.9 fs at A’ and τ= 33 ps at A”. In order to understand physically the behavior of the electr omagnetic waves, it must be pointed out that the discontinuous transitions between the two types of resonan ce are located exactly on Wood’s anomalies (point A and its symmetrical point B), so that they are linked to the em ergence or the vanishing of a diffracted wave. This phenomenon can be explained in considering the energetic ba nd structure: below Wood’s anomaly, the first non- propagating (evanescent in zdirection) diffracted wave ( n= +1 at the point A and n= -2 at the point B) is responsible for the excitation of the horizontal surface-p lasmon resonance. When the resonance crosses Wood’s anomaly, the evanescent wave becomes a z-direction propagating diffracted wave (at grazing angle) w hich can not excite an horizontal resonance anymore, but is coupled to ve rtical surface-plasmons located on the vertical walls of slits. Then, we obtain a flat band which corresponds to a ”weak er” resonance in the Fabry-Perot like cavity delimited by the top and bottom surfaces of the grating. This vertical r esonance is coupled with the last propagating diffracted wave, thus it ends at the crossing with Wood’s anomaly, where this wave vanishes. The complex band structure in Fig. 2 has also a continuous tra nsition between the horizontal and the vertical resonances in the lower band. The flat band at normal incidenc e corresponds to vertical resonances, and becomes a surface-plasmon band for greater incident angles. Its qual ity factor increases from 20 to about 300 during this smooth transition. The last flat band at about 0.35 eV corresponds to a vertical resonance for the whole range of kxin Fig. 2. By varying the width aof the slits, we have observed that the complex mode of the ver tical resonance is nearly unchanged. In the calculation, it can be seen from the modal d ecomposition of the electromagnetic field, that this resonance corresponds mainly to the excitation of the first e igenmode of a zinfinitely extended region II. The wave is evanescent in the xdirection and propagates at the vertical interfaces air/me tal (zdirection). This TM mode exists for any width of slit, and becomes equal to the wave vector kpsof the surface-plasmon of a semi-infinite air-metal interface in the limit of wide slits, so that it is more correc t to call it a vertical surface-plasmon mode instead of a waveguide mode. The transitions between the regions II/I an d II/III act as mirrors for the vertical surface-plasmon mode. Their reflection coefficients are low, so that the vertic al resonance is a Fabry-Perot like resonance with low quality factors. Complex dispersion curves shown above can be seen as conveni ent compact representations of the resonances, which can be associated to transmission spectra. For that purpose , we make the hypothesis that the complex frequency ωi 0 of a resonance iis a single pole of the amplitude of the transmitted waves. Co nsequently, the zero-order transmitted energy can be approximated by a Lorentzian function near the resonance i. Assuming ωis the (real valued) frequency of the incident wave, we obtain: 2T0=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleαi ω−ωi 0/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2 . (3) The complex band structure of the grating is shown in Fig. 3 fo r a height h= 3µm. Fig. 4 shows the zero-order transmission spectra calculated for the same height and two different angles of incidence. They correspond to θ= 0◦ (a) and θ= 12◦(b) cuttings in Fig. 3(a). The Lorentzian curves correspond ing to Eq. (3) are added to the spectra. The constant αiis fitted to obtain the same maximum value as the spectra. At no rmal incidence (Fig. 4(a)), the broad resonances at 0.38 eV and 0.54 eV (not represented in Fi g. 3) are not separated enough to allow the comparison to their respective Lorentzian functions to be made. In such a case, the amplitude of the transmitted wave is the sum of two complex Lorentzian functions, and phase considerati ons make it more difficult to fit to the spectra. For the other peaks, Fig. 4 shows an excellent agreement of th e Lorentzian curves with the spectra. Hence, the single-pole approximation is justified and Eq. (3) gives the width at half maximum: ∆ω0=−2ℑ(ωi 0). (4) It justifies also the above definition of the quality factor of the resonance, which corresponds to the more conventional Q=E/∆E. These transmission spectra allow some important character istics of the resonances to be pointed out. At first, it must be noted that the flat band at about 0.35 eV has no solution at normal incidence, and the peak γdisappears atθ= 0◦. An energetic shift can be seen for the horizontal surface-p lasmon resonances between θ= 0◦andθ= 12◦, whereas the vertical resonance at about 0.17 eV does not move . Another point which comes out of the calculations is that vertical resonances in contiguous slits are nearly u ncoupled. As a consequence, a periodic structure is not necessary for them to exist: the vertical surface-plasmon r esonance could be excited in an unique slit, and fully couple d with a few ones. Hence, an important result is that the vertic al resonance can be efficiently excited by a strongly focalized beam. In conclusion, we have carried out the calculation of the com plex dispersion curves of rectangular metallic gratings in TM polarization. CPBS are directly linked to experimenta l data, like transmission spectra. The quality factor and the lifetime of resonances, that they provide, are crucial c haracteristics in many applications already proposed for t he extraordinary effects appearing in such transmission metal lic gratings. CPBS show pronounced discontinuities locate d on Wood’s anomalies, which can not be evidenced in the usual e nergetic dispersion curves. They allow to distinguish unambiguously the two different natures of resonances: horizontal and vertical surface-plasmon resonances . Similar results can be obtained for reflection gratings. This work ca n also be extended in order to analyze resonances in more complex geometries, as Ebbesen’s structures [1] for ex ample, for which a cutoff diameter exists for vertical modes. The characteristics of the resonances studied in thi s Letter open up new possibilities in photonic materials. Moreover, these structures allow huge concentrations of li ght in very small volumes, which could have applications in fundamental optics [16] and in optoelectronics. ∗email: Fabrice.Pardo@L2m.cnrs.fr [1] T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. W olff, Nature 391, 667 (1998). [2] H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, D. E. Grupp, T. W. Ebbesen, and H. J. L ezec, Phys. Rev. B 58, 6779 (1998). [3] T. Thio, H. F. Ghaemi, H. J. Lezec, P. A. Wolff, and T. W. Ebbe sen, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 1743 (1999). [4] D. E. Grupp, H. J. Lezec, T. Thio, and T. W. Ebbesen, Adv. Ma ter.11, 860 (1999). [5] C. S¨ onnichsen, A. C. Duch, G. Steininger, M. Koch, G. von Plessen, and J. Feldmann, App. Phys. Lett. 76, 140 (2000). [6] T. J. Kim, T. Thio, T. W. Ebbesen, D. E. Grupp, and H. J. Leze c, Opt. Lett. 24, 256 (1999). [7] T. Thio, H. J. Lezec, and T. W. Ebbesen, Physica B 279, 90 (2000). [8] J. A. Porto, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. B. Pendry, Phys. Re v. Lett. 83, 2845 (1999). [9] T. Lopez-Rios, D. Mendoza, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, J. Sanche z-Dehesa, and B. Pannetier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 665 (1998). [10] W.-C. Tan, T. W. Preist, J. R. Sambles, and N. P. Wandstal l, Phys. Rev. B 59, 12661 (1999). [11] N. P. Wandstall, T. W. Preist, W. C. Tan, M. B. Sobnack, an d J. R. Sambles, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2869 (1998). [12] V. Kuzmiak and A. A. Maradudin, Phys. Rev. B 55, 7427 (1997). [13] B. Dold and R. Mecke, Optik 22, 435 (1965). [14] P. Sheng, R. S. Stepleman, and P. N. Sanda, Phys. Rev. B 26, 2907 (1982). [15] F. Pardo, Ph.D. thesis 86 PA11 2161, Univ. Paris-Sud Ors ay (1986), http://services.inist.fr, 59477 . [16] J. Pendry, Science 285, 1687 (1999). 3FIG. 1. Description of the metallic grating. Horizontal and vertical surface-plasmons are symbolically represented. FIG. 2. Energetic (a) and quality-factor Q(b) representation of the first four photonic bands of a recta ngular metallic grating ( d= 3.5µm,a= 0.5µm) with a height h= 1.4µm. The lower band is only computed for energies higher than 0. 125 eV (λ <10µm). Wood’s anomalies (lines) are added to the energetic band structure (a). FIG. 3. Energetic (a) and quality-factor Q(b) representation of the first five photonic bands of a rectan gular metallic grating ( d= 3.5µm,a= 0.5µm) with a height h= 3.0µm. The lower band is only computed for energies higher than 0. 125 eV (λ <10µm). Wood’s anomalies (lines) are added to the energetic band structure (a). FIG. 4. Comparison between zero-order transmission spectr a (solid lines) and Lorentzian curves (dotted lines) for a rectangular metallic grating ( d= 3.5µm,a= 0.5µm,h= 3.0µm). The angle of incidence is (a) θ= 0◦and (b) θ= 12◦. 4ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉM dz /C0113y ax hRegion I Region II Region III/BC /BC/BA/BD/BC/BA/BE/BC/BA/BF/BC/BA/BG/BC/BA/BH /CZ /DC /BP /BO /B4 /AX /BC /B5 /BP /CZ/DC/BP/A0/BO/B4/AX/BC/B5/BP /B7/BE/AP /BP/CS/B4/CP/B5/CW /BP /BD /BM /BG /AM /D1 /BT /BU/BC /BD /BE /BD /BD/BC /BD/BC /BE /BD/BC /BF /BD/BC /BG /B4/CQ/B5/BT/B3/B3/BU/B3/B3/BU/B3 /BT/B3/C9/D9/CP/D0/CX/D8 /DD /BY /CP /D8/D3/D6 /BX/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /B4/CT/CE/B5/C8 /CP/D6/CP/D0/D0/CT/D0 /C8/CW/D3/D8/D3/D2 /C5/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CZ/DC /B4/CX/D2 /D9/D2/CX/D8/D7 /D3/CU /AP /BP/CS /B5/BC /BC/BA/BD/BC/BA/BE/BC/BA/BF/BC/BA/BG /AI /BP /BC Æ/AI /BP /BD/BE Æ/B4/CP/B5/CW /BP /BF /BM /BC /AM /D1 /AB/BC/AB/BD/BE Æ/BD/BE/AC/BC/AC/BD/BE /AD/BD/BE/BC /BD /BE /BD /BD/BC /BD/BC /BE /BD/BC /BF /BD/BC /BG /B4/CQ/B5/AB/BC /AB/BD/BE Æ/BD/BE/AC/BC /AC/BD/BE/AD/BD/BE/C9/D9/CP/D0/CX/D8 /DD /BY /CP /D8/D3/D6 /BX/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /B4/CT/CE/B5/C8 /CP/D6/CP/D0/D0/CT/D0 /C8/CW/D3/D8/D3/D2 /C5/D3/D1/CT/D2 /D8/D9/D1 /CZ/DC /B4/CX/D2 /D9/D2/CX/D8/D7 /D3/CU /AP /BP/CS /B5/BC /BC/BA/BE/BC/BA/BG/BC/BA/BI/BC/BA/BK /BD/B4/CP/B5 /AI /BP /BC Æ /AB/BC/AC/BC/BC /BC/BA/BE/BC/BA/BG/BC/BA/BI/BC/BA/BK /B4/CQ/B5 /AI /BP /BD/BE Æ/BC/BA/BD /BC/BA/BE /BC/BA/BF /BC/BA/BG /BC/BA/BH /AB/BD/BE/AC/BD/BE/AD/BD/BEÆ/BD/BE/CC /D6/CP/D2/D7/D1/CX/D7/D7/CX/D3/D2 /BY /CP /D8/D3/D6/C8/CW/D3/D8/D3/D2 /BX/D2/CT/D6/CV/DD /B4/CT/CE/B5

A SUPERCONDUCTIVE, LOW BETA SINGLE GAP CAVITY FOR A HIGH INTENSITY PROTON LINAC A. Facco, V. Zviagintsev1, INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Italy B. M. Pasini , Universita’ di Padova, Italy 1 on leave from ITEP, Moscow, Russia Abstract A single gap, 352 MHz superconducting reentrant cavity for 5-100 MeV beams has been designed and it is presently under construction. This development i s being done in the framework of a 30 mA proton linac project for nuclear waste transmutation. Mechanical , cryogenic and rf design characteristics of such cav ities will be described. 1 INTRODUCTION The TRASCO project for nuclear waste transmutation [1] requires a 5-100 MeV linac for acceleration of a 30 mA proton beam. Generally, roo m temperature Drift Tube Linac structures are used in this energy range; however, since the high duty cycle required for high current beams implies a very high power density on the resonators walls, the superconducting solution would offer many advantage s. Among various possibilities, single gap superconducting cavities at 352 MHz, able to cover the full range of velocity, could allow a linac design with high reliability [2]. Fig.1 Mechanical design of the reentrant cavity. This Independently-phased Superconducting Cavities Linac (ISCL) scheme, in which the power is distribu ted in a large number of rf sources, allows to increase the expected beam MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) significantly [3]; this is of outmost importance fo r ADS applications. Keeping the beam loading within about 15 kW per cavity allows beam transport without losses even in case of failure of one of the cavities, wit h no need to reset immediately the linac parameters. Thi s property gives the time for on-line repair or subst itution of accessible failing components, like rf amplifier s and power supplies, which are usually the main source o f beam shutdown [4]. We have designed and we are building a single gap cavity that could fulfil the required characteristics for an ISCL, i.e.: a relat ively large bore to reduce the risk of beam losses; axial symmetry of the accelerating field to prevent emitt ance increase (e.g., short quarter wave resonators usual ly have a measurable dipole field component); very wid e velocity acceptance given by the single gap, allowi ng for only one resonator type along the whole linac; simple geometry, which gives the possibility of optimising the production cycle for a low cost. A further advantage of this design is the possibility of using solid state rf amplifiers, which can be prese ntly built at a competitive cost but with an expected in crease of lifetime and reliability compared to tetrode and IOT amplifiers [9]. In the past, the main difficulty related to the construction of pillbox type superconducting caviti es was the strong multipacting. Reentrant cavities wit h tolerable multipacting have been demonstrated at Stanford [5]. Another difficulty related to axially symmetric low- β cavities is their flat shape, which requires a very strong mechanical structure to hold the liquid helium pressure. 2 CAVITY DESIGN Since our peculiar constraint was the linac reliabi lity, we designed this cavity with the conservative assumptions of operating it at a maximum surface fi eld of 25 MV/m, with a total rf surface resistance up t o 100 nΩ (RBCS≅58nΩ at 4.2 K) ; according to the linac architecture [8], a maximum beam loading of 15 kW i s foreseen. The study included rf design, multipactin g simulations and mechanical design. The rf design was studied with the code SUPERFISH; the calculated cavity parameters are listed in tab. 1. The resonator, with an rf length of 80 mm and a total length of 135 mm along the beam axis , is rather short and allows for a good linac packing factor; its outer diameter is 542 mm. Both the bore diameter and the gap length are 30 mm, allowing efficient acceleration down to β=0.1, i.e. about 5 MeV/A. The design value of the accelerating field i n operation is 8.3 MV/m, requiring less than 7W per cavity. We should remind that the search for maximu m shunt impedance was not the aim of this work. Since the main limitation in low- β superconducting cavities is usually determined by the maximum achievable surfac e electric field, related to the onset of field emiss ion, and since our linac design required relatively low ener gy gain per cavity, we looked mainly for low surface electric and magnetic field, and short size. Total length 135 mm Internal length 80 mm bore radius 15 mm frequency 352 MHz U/Ea2 0.034 J/(MV/m)2 Ep/Ea 3.05 Hp/Ea 30.6 Gauss/(MV/m) Γ=Rs×Q 83.9 Ω R’sh (Cu) 18 M Ω/m β ≥ 0.1 Tab. 1 Resonator parameters calculated by means of the code SUPERFISH. The rf power will be fed through a inductive couple r, still under study, located on the resonator equator ; a coaxial capacitive coupler in the resonator cut-off tube, although preferable, would be hardly feasible, due to the constraints on the resonator length imposed by the required linac packing factor. A deep study of the multipacting (MP) properties of the cavity was performed, with more than 50000 runs of the simulation program TWTRAJ [6]. The shape of the gap, where strong MP could be expected, prevent s the onset of MP because of the absence of the dangerous values of the electric-to-magnetic field ratio. The region where most of the multipacting levels we re concentrated, in the initial design schemes, was th e resonator equator. Electrons originated in many different positions inside the resonator and drifti ng to the equator were collected there (see Fig. 2), buil ding very strong levels with various multiplicities. Thi s region was properly shaped with an elliptical conto ur (ratio between axes 1:1.5) and all high field level s have been finally eliminated. Fig.2. Example of the multipacting simulation program output (the horizontal axis is stretched in the picture). The circular contour, as well as the rect angular one, was causing high field multipacting levels. The main concern in the mechanical design was relat ed to the large force acting on the relatively flat an d wide resonator surface. The niobium sheet, 3 mm thick, could not sustain the pressure in the absence of st rong reinforcement. We tackled this problem using a different approach: in our design, the helium vesse l is part of the resonator (like in the LNL bulk niobium low beta cavities [10]), and it is welded to the resona tor wall so that the net force on the total structure i s nearly cancelled. This design allows a relatively light st ructure with a good stability and a minimum displacement of the walls under pressure (limited to a few microns) when the tuner is mounted. The mechanical stresses are also confined to rather safe values (Fig. 3,4). The 4.2K helium is fed by gravity through a flange on the to p of the resonator; like in most superconducting linacs for heavy ions, there is no separation between the beam vacuum and the cryostat one. The tuning is obtained, changing the gap length, by means of a mechanical tuner connected to the extern al part of the drift tubes. A “nutcracker” type tuner, driven by a piezoelectric or magnetostrictive actuator, is being presently considered. Since the required tuning for ce is relatively low, the calculated Lorenz force detunin g (≅170 Hz/(MV/m)2) and helium pressure detuning (≅140 Hz/mbar) of the bare cavity are not negligible in comparison to the 1 kHz resonator rf bandwidth in operation. A stiff tuner reduces the pressure detun ing to ≅20 Hz/mbar. The foreseen cw mode of operation gives a nearly constant radiation pressure on the walls t hat can be compensated by the tuner. The experimental study of possible mechanical instabilities and of t heir remedies, however, is one of the aims of this proto type construction. For the design and simulation of the mechanical structure we used the I-DEAS code [7]. Fig.3. Reentrant cavity 2D mechanical simulation. Fig. 4. Mechanical deformation as a result of 1 bar pressure increase in the helium bath. The maximum displacement is about 20 µm in the outer shell (for clarity, the deformation is amplified in the pictur e). 3 CONCLUSIONS A low beta, 352 MHz superconducting reentrant cavity for high intensity proton beams has been designed. This single-gap structure contains novel features in the mechanical construction and allows for acceleration of low beta, 5-100 MeV protons. The cavity was designed as the accelerating element for an Independently-phased Superconducting Linac (ISCL), characterized by high reliability and efficiency, f or ADS applications. The prototype construction has started and the first rf test is expected within 20 00. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to M. Comunian and A. Pisent for their collaboration and their clarifying suggestion s. We thank also H. Safa and R. Parodi for the fruitful discussions about multipacting. REFERENCES [1] http://trasco.lnl.infn.it/ [2] M. Comunian, A. Facco, A. Pisent, “A 100 MeV superconducting proton linac: beam dynamics issue”, Proceedings of the XIX Int. Linear Accelerator Conference, Chicago, August 23-28, 1998. [3] M. Pasini, “Studio della sezione di media energ ia di un linac superconduttivo ad alta intensita’”, Te si di Laurea, Universita’ di Padova, A.A. 1999-2000. [4] Piaszcyk C.M., “Accelerator as a repairable system”, Proc. Of the Workshop on Reliability of High Power Proton Accelerators, Aix-en-Provence 1999. [5] P.H. Ceperly, J.S. Sokolowski, I. Ben-Zvi, H.F. Glavish and S.S. Hanna, “Beam test of a superconducting niobium cavity for a heavy ion accelerator”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 136 (1976) 421-423. [6] P. Fernadez, R. Parodi, “User’s guide TW-TRAJ”, SERA 90-224/mcl. [7] www.sdrc.com [8] A. Pisent, M. Comunian, A. Facco, M. Pasini, V. Zviagintsev, L.Celona, G. Ciavola, S. Gammino, INFN-LNS, Catania, G. Lamanna, “TRASCO 100 MeV High Intensity Proton Linac”, Proc. of the 7th EPAC Conference, Vienna, Austria, 1992. [9] T. Ruan et al., “Low cost High Power UHF MOSFET Amplifier", Proceedings of the 7th Annual Workshop on European Synchrotron Light Sources, ESLS 7, Berlin, Germany, November 1999. [10] A.Facco, J.S. Sokolowski and B. Elkonin, “A bu lk niobium low beta superconducting quarter wave resonator for ALPI”, Proc. of the 3rd EPAC Conference, Berlin, 1992, vol.2, p. 127.

arXiv:physics/0007084v1 [physics.atom-ph] 27 Jul 2000A SIMPLE MODEL FOR THE NON-RETARDED DISPERSIVE FORCE BETWEEN AN ELECTRICALLY POLARIZABLE ATOM AND A MAGNETICALLY POLARIZABLE ONE C. Farina⋆, F.C. Santos†and A.C. Tort‡ Instituto de F´ ısica - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeir o - CP 68528 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil - 21945-970. January 4, 2014 Abstract It is well known that for the case of two neutral but electrica lly polarizable atoms the consideration or not of retardation effects on the dispersiv e van der Waals force between them leads essentially to different power laws for the forces ; while the retarded force is proportional to 1 /r8, where ris the distance between the atoms, the non-retarded force is proportional to 1 /r7. Here we consider the (repulsive) dispersive force between an electrically polarizable atom and a magnetically polariza ble one and show that, in contrast to the previous case, a quite unexpected result appears, nam ely: while the retarded force is still proportional to 1 /r8, the non-retarded force is proportional to 1 /r5. We employ a semiclassical method based on the fluctuating dipole model f or both atoms. PACS: 35.20.-i ⋆e-mail: farina@i.f.ufrj.br †e-mail: filadelf@i.f.ufrj.br ‡e-mail:tort@if.ufrj.br 1In the context of thermodynamics of real gases, it was recogn ized by van der Waals [1] in the second half of last century that attractive forces shoul d exist between molecules (atoms) even when the molecules do not posses permanent electric dip ole moments. Since these forces depend on the atomic (electric) polarizabilities, which in turn are closely related to the refractive index, they are referred to as dispersive van der Waals force s. When retardation effects of the electromagnetic field interaction are neglected, an approx imation that can be made only for short distances, these forces are called non-retarded disp ersive van der Waals forces, while the name retarded dispersive van der Waals forces is left for the cases where the retardation effects are not negligible. From experimental data, van der W aals tried to infer the form of the interaction energy between the atoms, but the correct fo rm and explanation for the non- dispersive forces had to wait for the advent of quantum mecha nics and only after the paper by London [2] in 1930 the precise origin of these forces were u nderstood. The influence of retardation effects on the dispersive forces were obtained f or the first time in 1948 by Casimir and Polder [3]. Basically they showed that, while the non-re tarded force is proportional to 1/r7, where ris the distance between the two atoms, the retarded force beh aves like 1 /r8. An immediate consequence of dispersive forces between two ato ms is the existence of (dispersive) forces also for macroscopic bodies (for a detailed discussi on see for instance [4]). For the case of two rarefied macroscopic bodies, the resultant dispe rsive force can be obtained by a direct integration of the pairwise forces. On the other hand , for non-rarefied media the non- additivity effects must be taken into account [4, 5] (see also [6] for a simple discussion). However, though the final numerical result is affected by these effects, the pairwise integration already gives the correct dependence on the geometry. For instance, the retarded force per unit area between two parallel semi-infinite slabs of polarizable mat erial distant apart a distance dis proportional to 1 /d4, no matter the non-sdditivities are taken into account or no t. Retardation effects are automatically taken into account when the intera ction energy is calculated with the aid of the zero-point energy method, introduced in 1948 b y Casimir [7]. In fact, the (standard electromagnetic) Casimir force between two macr oscopic bodies can be considered as the retarded dispersive van der Waals force between them w ith the non-additivity effects included1. In this note, we shall investigate the non-retarded interac tion between two non-similar atoms: one of them is only electrically polarizable and the o ther, only magnetically polarizable. We shall show that a quite unexpected result is obtained, nam ely: while the retarded interac- tion is proportional to 1 /r7(retarded force proportional to 1 /r8), the non-retarded interaction is proportional to 1 /r4(non-retarded force proportional to 1 /r5), in contrast to the 1 /r6depen- dence for the case of the interaction energy between two elec trically polarizable atoms. Though here we discuss a simple model, this drastic change is fully j ustified in a QED calculation [9]. The retarded interaction energy between two atoms with both electrically and magnetically polarizations was calculated for the first time by Feinberg a nd Sucher [10] and is given by (see also a detailed discussion in reference [11]: U(r) = [−23 (α1α2+β1β2) + 7 ( α1β2+α2β1)]¯hc 4πr7, (1) 1The Casimir effect is more general than that, since it occurs w henever a relativistic field (not only the electromagnetic one) is constrained by some boundary condi tions or is considered in a topologically non-trivial manifold [8] 2where in Eq.(1 ) αiis the (static) polarizability and βiis the (static) magnetic polarizability, but, as far as the authors are aware of, no one in literature had con sidered the non-retarded case until very recently [9], where the authors show, with the aid of per turbative quantum electrodynamics techniques, that the non-retarded dispersion van der Waals interaction potential for the case at hand obeys a 1 /r4law and not the 1 /r6law as one would naively think. It is the purpose of this note to obtain this rather surprising result in a much si mpler way, which we think can be understood by any undergraduate student who is familiar wit h introductory electromagnetism and ordinary quantum mechanics. Our procedure will be based on the dipole fluctuating method a s discussed for instantce in references [4, 5, 6]. To this effect we model the electric pola rizable molecule by an electric charge eof mass mewhich oscillates harmonically along a fixed, but arbitrary d irection defined by the unit vector ˆ ue, so that the atom is effectively replaced by an electric dipol ep(t) =exe(t)ˆ ue, where xemeasures the position along the oscillation axis taking the origin at the equilibrium position. The magnetically polarizable atom will be replac ed by a magnetic charge gof mass mgwhich, similarly to its electric counterpart, also oscilla tes harmonically along another fixed, but arbitrary direction defined by the unit vector ˆ ug. Effectively we have a magnetic dipole m(t) =g xg(t)ˆ ugplaying the role of the magnetically polarizable atom. Each dipole is the source of electric and magnetic fields that pervade all space . Each dipole also probes the electric and magnetic fields created by the other. The electric and magnetic fields at a point of the space identi fied by the position vector r created by an electric dipole are given by [12]: Eq(r, t) = [3 ( p(t∗)·ˆr) ˆr−p(t∗)]1 r3+ [3 (˙ p(t∗)·ˆr) ˆr−˙ p(t∗)]1 cr2 −[¨ p(t∗)−(¨ p(t∗)·ˆ r)ˆ r]1 c2r, (2) and Bq(r, t) =/bracketleftbigg1 cr2˙ p(t∗) +1 c2r¨ p(t∗)/bracketrightbigg ׈ r. (3) where ris the distance from the dipole to the point of observation an dt∗=t−r/cis the retarded time. The fields generated by a magnetic dipole can b e obtained by means of the substitutions p→m,E→BandB→ −E[12]. The Lorentz force acting on the electric dipole whose position is identified by the vector reat a given instant of time tis Fe(re, t) =eEg(re, t∗) +e cve(t)×Bg(re, t∗). (4) In the same way, the Lorentz force acting on the magnetic dipo le will be given by: Fg(rg, t) =gBe(rg, t∗)−g cvg(t)×Ee(rg, t∗). (5) If we project these forces along the directions defined by the (fixed) unit vectors ˆ ueandˆ ug, neglect retardament and radiation reaction, and take into a ccount the forces that bind the oscillating electric and magnetic charges to their respect ive centers of force by simulating them through Hookean forces, we end up with a coupled system of lin ear differential equations which reads ¨xe(t) +ω2 exe(t) =e meEg(re, t)·ˆ ue+e mecve(t)×Bg(re, t)·ˆ ue, (6) 3¨xg(t) +ω2 gxg(t) =g mgBe(rg, t)·ˆ ug+g mgcvg(t)×Ee(rg, t)·ˆ ug. (7) where ωeandωgare, respectively, the natural frequencies of the electric and magnetic dipoles. If the dipoles are not very far from each other ( r≪137a0,where a0is Bohr’s radius, see for instance [6]), the dominant term leads to: ¨xe(t) +ω2 exe(t) =F(r) ˙xg(t) (8) where F(r) := +eg mecr2(ˆug׈reg)·ˆue, since ˆ rge=−ˆreg, and ¨xg(t) +ω2 gxg(t) =H(r) ˙xe(t) (9) where H(r) := +eg mgcr2(ˆue׈reg)·ˆug. Equations (8) and (9) form system of coupled differential equations that can be solved in the usual way, i.e.,we try a solution of the form xi(t) = Ciexp(−iωt), where Ciis a complex constant with i=e, g, thereby obtaining the following algebraic equation: Ω2−/parenleftBig ω2 e+ω2 g−F(r)H(r)/parenrightBig Ω +ω2 eω2 g= 0. (10) where Ω := ω2.If we set F(r)H(r) = 0 we can easiliy verify that the roots of the above equation are real and given by Ω 1=ω2 eand Ω 2=ω2 gas expected. The roots of Eq.(10 ) satisfy the simple relations Ω1+ Ω2=ω2 e+ω2 g−F(r)H(r) (11) and Ω1Ω2=ω2 eω2 g (12) Let us introduce the auxiliary quantity S:= (ω1+ω2)2−(ωe+ωg)2, (13) where ω1andω2are two real positive roots of the original algebraic equati on of the fourth degree for ω. Using the simple properties given by Eqs.(11) and (12) we fin d S=−F(r)H(r) (14) Hence from and we can write ω1+ω2= (ωe+ωg)/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt1 +S (ωe+ωg)2 (15) Upon quantization and assuming that |S| ≪(ωe+ωg)2the ground state energy will be given by E0=¯h 2(ω1+ω2)≈¯h 2(ωe+ωg) +¯h e2g2 4 (ω1+ω2)memgc2Q2 eg r4 =¯h 2(ωe+ωg) +¯h 4/parenleftbiggωeωg c2/parenrightbigg/parenleftBiggωeωg ωe+ωg/parenrightBiggα β Q2 eg r4(16) 4where we have rewritten the last term, which is the interacti on potential, so that the electric and magnetic polarizabilities α=e2 meω2eandβ=g2 mgω2, can be identified . The quantity Qeg:= (ˆ ug׈ reg)·ˆ ueis a spatial orientation factor to be properly averaged. The force between the electrically polarizable atom and the magnetically pol arizable one is repulsive as expected, but it varies with the inverse fifith power of the separation: F(r) = ¯h/parenleftbiggωeωg c2/parenrightbigg/parenleftBiggωeωg ωe+ωg/parenrightBiggα β Q2 eg r5reg (17) The 1/r4behavior of (16) (or the 1 /r5behavior of (17) can be traced back to the near field approximation of the electromagnetic fields involved, whic h contribute to the problem with terms varying with 1 /r2and to the fact that terms stemming from the vector products i n the equations of motion are zero. Take, for instance, the magnet ically polarizable atom. There are two forces acting on it: the first one is due to the magnetic fiel d created by the fluctuating electri dipole of the other atom, which does not have the typi cal 1/r3behaviour of a static zone field; the second one is due to the cross product between t he magnetic charge velocity (/vector vg) and the electric field generated by the electric fluctuating dipole ( /vectorEe). However, though /vectorEe exhibits the static zone term (proportional to 1 /r3), this term disappears from the calculation when projected into the fixed (but arbitrary) direction of mo tion of the magnetic charge g. An analogous explanation holds for the electric polarizable a tom. We conclude, then, that this is a very peculiar result whose origin lies in the fact that on e of the atoms is only electrically polarizable and the other, only magnetically polarizable. Had we started with two magnetically polarizable atoms, we would have obtained a non-dispersive interaction energy proportional to 1/r6. Acknowledgements: One of us (C.F.) wishes to acknowledge the partial financial s upport of CNPq (the National Research Council of Brazil). References [1] J.D. van der Waals; Over de continuiteit van den gas-en vloeistoftoestand , Dissertation, (1873). [2] F. London, “Zur Theorie und Systemakik der Molecularkra fte,”, Z. Phys. 63, 245 (1930). [3] H.B.G. Casimir and D. Polder, The influence of retardation on the London-van der Waals forces, Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948). [4] Dieter Langbein, Theory of van der Waals attraction , Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol.72(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974). [5] P.W. Milonni, The Quantum Vaccum: An introduction to Quantum Electrodyna mics, (Aca- demic Press, New York, 1994). [6] C. Farina, F. C. Santos and A. C. Tort, “A simple way of unde rstanding the nonadditivity of van der Waals dispersion forces,” Am. J. Phys. 67, 344-349 (1999). 5[7] H.B.G. Casimir, “On the attraction between two perfectl y conducting plates,” Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51, 793 (1948). [8] V.M. Mostepanenko and N.N. Trunov, The Casimir effect and its applications (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997). [9] C. Farina, F.C. Santos and A.C. Tort, “The non-retarded d ispersive force between an elec- trically polarizable atom and a magnetically polarizable o ne,”, hep-th/0007190, submitted for publication. [10] G. Feinberg and J. Sucher, “General form of the retarded van der Waals potentials,” J. Chem. Phys. 48, 3333-3334 (1968). [11] T.H. Boyer, “Recalculations of Long-Range van der Waal s Potentials,” Phys. Rev. 180,19- 24 (1969); “Asymptotic Retarde van der Waals Forces Derived from Classical Electrody- namics with Classical Electromagnetic Zero-Point Radiati on,” Phys. Rev. A5, 1799-1802 (1972). [12] J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2nd edition, New York, 1975), pg. 395. 6

arXiv:physics/0007085v1 [physics.atom-ph] 27 Jul 2000Measurement of the21Ne Zeeman frequency shift due to Rb-21Ne collisions R.E. Stoner and R.L. Walsworth Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138 (July 24, 2013) We compared the frequency shift of the21Ne Zeeman resonance induced by polarized Rb vapor to the shift induced in the3He Zeeman resonance. The3He/Rb shift has recently been measured with high precision [18], permitting the conversion of our differ ential measurement to an absolute value for the21Ne/Rb shift. We report a value of κ21= 31.8±2.8 for the Rb-21Ne enhancement factor at a temperature of 124 .8o±1.9oC. We propose high-precision differential contact shift mea surements, the absolute accuracy of which would be limited by the error i n the3He contact shift. 32.80.Bx, 32.60.+i, 84.40.Ik, 34.20.-b, 67.65.+z I. INTRODUCTION Polarization of noble gases by spin exchange with optically pumped alkali metal vapors [1,2] is an important technique for a variety of scientific and technological appl ications. Polarized noble gases been used for: precise mea- surements of the neutron spin structure function [3]; neutr on polarizers and analyzers [4]; magnetic resonance imagin g [5–7]; studies of gas diffusion in porous media [8]; gain medi a for Zeeman masers [9–11]; and tests of fundamental symmetries [12–15]. New tests of fundamental symmetries using polarized noble g ases have recently been proposed. Kostelecky and Lane recently reported that a21Ne/3He differential magnetometer could be used to test local Lore ntz invariance (LLI) [16]. We have proposed to develop a21Ne/3He dual noble gas maser to carry out such an LLI test [17]. The spin exchange interaction between alkali and noble gas a toms has been extensively described in the litera- ture [2,18,20–22]. During spin exchange collisions, there is significant overlap of the alkali atom’s valence electron wavefunction with the noble gas nucleus which comprises a Fe rmi contact interaction of the form Hint=α/vectorK·/vectorS (1) where /vectorSand/vectorKare the electron and nuclear spin angular momentum operator s, respectively. This interaction leads to exchange of angular momentum between the alkali valence ele ctron and the noble gas nucleus. The valence electron and nucleus experience during the collision a strong magnet ic field from the close proximity of their spin magnetic moments. In spite of the small fraction of the time spent in co llision, the average magnetic fields experienced by both the alkali valence electron and the noble gas nucleus ca n be affected if either the alkali or noble gas species is polarized. The resultant change in the Larmor precession fr equency for either species, referred to as the contact shift , is expressed in terms of an enhancement factor κ.κis defined in terms of the totalshift in the Larmor precession frequencies in co-located spherical distributions of magn etizations, induced both by the contact interaction and by the classical magnetic fields generated by the magnetizatio ns.κis the ratio of that total frequency shift (contact plus classical magnetization) to the shift that would be ind uced by the classical magnetization alone. κcan be much greater than unity, increasing with increasing Zof the noble gas nucleus [20]. In the limit where the formatio n of alkali-noble gas van der Waals molecules is a negligible par t of the spin exchange interaction (true for the experiment reported in this paper), a single enhancement factor descri bes both the contact shift of the noble gas Zeeman splitting by the alkali atoms, and vice versa. [23]. The frequency shif t experienced by noble gas atoms in the presence of polarized alkali atoms, including both the contact shift an d the shift due to classical magnetization fields, is δωng= (κ−1 +fDDF)γng·8π 3gSµB[a]∝an}bracketle{tSz∝an}bracketri}ht (2) Recall the elementary result that8π 3Mis the magnetic field strength inside a magnetized sphere wit h magnetic dipole moment density M; the field is uniform and parallel to the magnetization. fDDFis a dimensionless factor that accounts for the effect of classical magnetization field s (”distant dipole fields” [18]), and is unity for a spherical distribution of magnetization. [ a] is the number per unit volume of alkali atoms, and γngis the gyromagnetic ratio of the noble gas species. For convenience, we define the compo nent of alkali atom magnetization along the magnetic field (z) axis, Ma, as Ma= ¯hγa[a]∝an}bracketle{tSz∝an}bracketri}ht (3) 1where γa=gSµB/¯h= 2π·1.40 MHz/gauss is the electron gyromagnetic ratio. The alka li nuclear magnetic moments do not contribute to the contact shift, but do affect the dista nt dipole fields produced by the alkali magnetization distribution. We ignored these effects on the distant dipole fields, since they were too small to bear on the results reported in this work. In precision measurements, it is important to be able to moni tor the absolute polarization of the noble gases. Romalis and Cates [18] demonstrated accurate polarimetry o f3He using the Rb Zeeman frequency shift due to Rb- 3He spin exchange collisions, and made a very precise measure ment of the Rb-3He enhancement factor. Future use of21Ne in precision measurement applications would benefit from the use of contact shift polarimetry, but there is at present no published measurement of the Rb-21Ne enhancement factor. In this paper we present the first such measurement. We measured the net Larmor frequency shifts, s imultaneously impressed by the presence of polarized Rb, on ensembles of polarized3He and21Ne precessing in the same [nearly] spherical glass cell. The measurement presented in this paper is not the first in which a ratio of cont act shift enhancement factors was determined. Baranga et. al. measured the shifts of the Larmor precession frequencies of Rb and K vapors residing in the same cell, induced simultaneously by the presence of polarized3He [19]. The experiment is described in Section II. Determining the r atio of the Rb-induced shifts permitted us to divide out the dependence on Rb magnetization, and express the21Ne enhancement factor κ21in terms of the3He enhance- ment factor κ3. The very accurate measurement of κ3by Romalis and Cates determined the absolute contact shift enhancement factor κ21. Analysis of the data is presented in Section III. Suggestio ns for improved measurements are given in Section IV. II. APPARATUS, PROCEDURE, SYSTEM PARAMETERS We employed a21Ne/3He dual noble gas Zeeman maser to establish simultaneous pre cession of the21Ne and the3He in the same sealed glass cell. The21Ne/3He maser is a new device that will be described elsewhere; tha t description is summarized here. Figure 1 is a schematic representation o f the maser. Circularly polarized light resonant with the Rb D1 transition (795 nm) is generated by a 30 W laser diode arr ay (LDA); the light is directed onto a 1.4 cm dia [near-] spherical sealed glass cell containing 228 torr of21Ne, 266 torr of3He, 31 torr of N 2, and Rb metal of natural isotopic composition [24]. The LDA light propagates along t he axis of a uniform magnetic field of strength 3 Gauss. The field is generated by a precision solenoid/ µ-metal-shield system capable of producing a 3 G magnetic fiel d with ≤35µG/cm magnetic field gradients, with no gradient shimming. Th e main solenoid was driven using a current source capable of ∼3 ppm stability over timescales of order 1000 sec. The glass c ell was heated both by the LDA light and blown hot air to a temperature of (124 .8±1.9)oC (see Sec. III). The temperature of the air surrounding the cell was controlled to about 43 mK RMS. The total output po wer of the LDA was actively controlled to about a part in 104. The Rb was polarized by optical pumping; the resulting Rb ele ctron polarization was very close to unity. The output power of the LDA was about 30W, so that even though it had a very broad ( ∼1.5 nm) linewidth, the on-resonant optical power was roughly 0.5 W. Thus, the optical pumping ra te was >105photon absorptions per sec per Rb atom. The rate of Rb polarization destruction events per Rb atom in the cell was <103sec−1so that the Rb electron polarization was greater than 0.99. Pickup coils wound in se ries were placed in close proximity to the cell. The coils were excited by the magnetic flux associated with the precess ion of the polarized noble gases. The coils were part of a tuned resonant circuit with resonances at both noble gas pre cession frequencies. The large current flow induced in the pickup coils by resonant excitation resulted in magnetic fie lds oscillating at the noble gas nuclear Larmor frequencies being impressed back on the precessing atoms. This feedback resulted in steady state maser operation. 21Ne has nuclear spin 3/2, and thus a quadrupole moment. The qua drupole moments of the21Ne ensemble interact coherently with electric field gradients at the glass cell wa lls, shifting the four Zeeman energy levels so as to split the three [otherwise degenerate] dipole transitions [25]. The splitting is proportional to δωQ∝3 cos2θ−1, where θis the angle of the cell’s symmetry axis with the magnetic fiel d. We oriented the cell as close as possible to the ”magic angle” cos θ=/radicalbig 1/3 to minimize the quadrupole splitting. The quadrupole wa ll shifts in the cell were not measured; however, computer simulations indicate that wit hout proper cell orientation, realistic-sized splittings could disrupt21Ne maser oscillation. In any case,21Ne maser oscillation with steady-state amplitude was attai ned. We observed a small ( ∼10µHz) sinusoidal modulation of the21Ne maser frequency. The period of the modulation was about 16 hr. We speculate that the modulation was a consequen ce of remnant quadrupole splitting resulting from cell orientation error. In any case, the effect was small, wit h a period much longer than the duration of our contact shift measurements, and thus was not a source of significant s ystematic error. The3He and21Ne maser signals were presented to a low-noise preamplier. T he preamp output was then analyzed using lockin amplifiers, which were referenced to a set of syn chronized signal generators tuned near the noble gas 2maser frequencies and locked to an H-maser-derived 5 MHz sig nal. The phases of both noble gas masers’ precession were recorded digitally at a sample rate of 1 Hz. The A/D sampl ing trigger was also derived from the master 5 MHz reference. The measurements consisted of observing the maser phases du ring a series of reversals of the direction of the Rb polarization. The Rb polarization was reversed by rotation of the quarter-wave plates (Fig. 1) and was typically achieved in ≤20 sec. The total duration of a set of reversals was about 1000 sec., limited by magnetic field stability as well as the extent to which the noble gas masers’ steady sta tes were disrupted by the alternating Rb polarization. Two sets of reversal data were acquired. Clear changes in the slopes of the phase curves were precisely correlated with reversal of the Rb polarization direction; these frequency changes were the result of the contact shift combined with the [classical] shift due to the Rb magnetization distribut ion. The change of noble gas maser oscillation frequency induced by Rb polarization reversal was about 44 mHz for21Ne maser and 71 mHz for the3He maser. III. DATA AND ANALYSIS Phase data for the second of the two measurement scans are sho wn in Figs. 2 and 3. We model the21Ne phase ϕ21 (see Fig. 2) and the3He phase ϕ3(see Fig. 3) acquired by the lockin amplifiers as evolving acc ording to the following equations: ϕ21=ϕ21,o+γ21Bot−2πυref,21+γ21/integraldisplayt 0dt′δB(t′) + (κ21−1 +fDDF)γ218π 3/integraldisplayt 0dt′MRb(t′) ϕ3=ϕ3,o+γ3Bot−2πυref,3+γ3/integraldisplayt 0dt′δB(t′) + (κ3−1 +fDDF)γ38π 3/integraldisplayt 0dt′MRb(t′) (4) where: γ21(γ3) is the gyromagnetic ratio of Ne (He); κ21(κ3) is the enhancement factor for Ne (He); fDDFis the dimensionless factor to account for the classical magnetic field due to the Rb magnetization; νref,21andνref,3are the reference frequencies presented to the lockin amplifiers; Bois the time-average magnetic field strength over the time interval; δBis the time-dependent deviation of the magnetic field from it s mean value; and MRbis the Rb magneti- zation. Note that independent maser frequency measurement s determined the ratio of the two gyromagnetic ratios, γ3/γ21, to an accuracy much better than 1 ppm. Also, the effects of mag netic fields due to noble gas magnetization fields on the phases have been neglected in comparison to the c ontact shift effects; this is reasonable for the noble gas magnetizations of this experiment (see below). Magnetic field drift occurred over the course of the measurem ent scan. However, the21Ne and3He masers are co-located magnetometers, so that we can construct a data se t from which the effects of magnetic field drift and Rb distant dipole fields have been removed. We define ∆ϕ≡ϕ3−γ3 γ21ϕ21 (5) It is easily shown that ∆ϕ=ϕ3,o−ϕ21,o+ 2π/parenleftbiggγ3 γ21νref,21−νref,3/parenrightbigg t+ (κ3−κ21)γ38π 3/integraldisplayt 0dt′MRb(t′) (6) Aside from a trivial phase offset and known linear phase evolu tion, ∆ ϕreflects the action of the Rb contact shifts only: phase evolution due to magnetic fields is subtracted off. This combined phase profile is plotted in Fig. 4. As seen in Fig. 4, the phase evolution due to the contact shift was a piec ewise-linear ”sawtooth” profile. Since our measurement is derived from computing the differences in slopes between a djacent linear regions of the curve, removal of constant and linear dependence from the phase data had no effect on the m easurement. Thus, our plots of the phase data shown in Figs. 2, 3, and 4 are displayed with mean value and mea n slope of zero. If the Rb magnetization were known, one could immediately de duceκ21using eqn (6). Even though the Rb electron spin polarization was very close to unity, the density was no t known a priori . It was therefore necessary to consider the ratio of contact shifts impressed on the ϕ21and the ∆ ϕphase curves, and then determine the temperature self-consistently. The data were analyzed in two ways which yielded essentially identical results. First, we computed the average changes in slope of the phase curves ϕ21and ∆ ϕ, caused by the reversals of the Rb magnetization. That is, a l east- squares linear fitting routine was used to extract the slope o f each piecewise linear region of the phase curves. The differences in slope of adjacent regions was then recorded fo r each of the phase curves. The mean absolute values 3of the slope differences were then computed for each data set. We define M21as the mean of the absolute value of the slope differences for ϕ21, and ∆ Mas that for the ∆ ϕprofile. The uncertainties were estimated as the standard deviation of the mean in the slope differences’ absolute valu es. We define the ratio of mean slope changes as R ≡M21/∆M. The weighted average value for Rfrom the two data sets was R= 0.1262±0.0025 where a one-sigma uncertainty is reported. The uncerta inty was almost entirely due to that in M21. The fractional uncertainty in ∆ Mfor both of the data sets was <0.1% This indicates that Rb polarization reversal was achieved to high precision and th at the Rb magnetization was stable to better than 0.1% over the course of the measurements. The fractional uncerta inty in M21was much larger, ∼2%, caused by the effects of magnetic field drift. In principle, we could have analyzed theϕ3profile rather than ϕ21, but magnetic field drift effects were γ3/γ21= 9.65 times larger on ϕ3thanϕ21, making it impractical to extract slope data from ϕ3directly (see Fig. 3). In our analysis we did not account for possible variations in frequency due to changes in the noble gas longitudinal polarization that occurred in the course of a measurement. T he magnetization of the noble gases created magnetic fields which varied in time during the course of the each of the two measurement scans, as evidenced by [small] maser amplitude changes observed during the scans. A given m aser’s magnetization field could not affect its own frequency, since magnetization fields were parallel to the m agnetization in the near-spherical cell. However, each maser’s frequency was shifted by the other’s magnetization , and such shifts did not subtract out of ∆ ϕas did magnetic field drift. The noble gas polarizations underwent both slow drift as well as variations correlated with the Rb polarization reversals. The small uncertainty in the ∆ϕslope differences proves that frequency variations due to slow drift in the noble gas magnetizations had negligi ble effect. We also determined that the variations of the noble gas polarization caused by the periodic Rb polariz ation reversal had negligible effect on the contact shift measurement. Periodic reversal of the Rb polarization (i.e ., ”square wave” modulation of the Rb polarization) induced a ”sawtooth wave” modulation (i.e., integrated square wave ) on the noble gas polarizations of peak-to-peak amplitude approximately γSEτ, where γSEis the Rb-noble gas spin exchange rate per noble gas atom, and τ= time between Rb polarization reversals. Thus, the varying noble gas pola rizations induced large changes in the maser frequencies over a measurement period: we estimate that a 2.8 mHz shift wa s induced on the3He maser by the21Ne polarization variation and a 0.7 mHz shift was induced on the21Ne maser by the3He polarization variation. However, given a constant time interval τbetween Rb polarization reversals, the average frequency shifts due to the Rb-driven noble gas polarization variations did not change from one period t o the next, thus they subtracted out in the calculation of the period-to-period frequency changes M21and ∆ M. We conclude that noble gas polarization-induced magnetic fields had no systematic effect on the measurement of R. It is easy to show from eqns (4) and (6) that the ratio Rcan be interpreted as R=/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingleγ21 γ3·κ21+ (fDDF−1) κ3−κ21/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle(7) where it is seen that dependence on the Rb magnetization divi ded out. The value and estimated uncertainty for R can then be used to compute the value and uncertainty of the de sired contact shift enhancement factor for21Ne, κ21, though the system temperature must be known because3He contact shift κ3is temperature-dependent. κ21and the system temperature must be determined self-consistent ly, and the effect of classical magnetization fields must be accounted for: these questions are addressed below. We now consider the second method of analyzing the data to obt ain a value for R, which yielded essentially the same results as the above approach. While this second method is slightly more complex, it is useful because it provides a framework for estimating the size of magnetic fiel d drift in the present measurement. This second method of extracting a value of Rfrom the data considers the phase data sets to be N-component vectors (denoted by a tilde), where N≡number of data in the set ( ∼103for each of the two scans). We use the ∆ ϕprofile as a model of the shape of the Rb magnetization-induced phase (see eqn 6 ). We then seek to describe the ˜ ϕ21profile vector as a linear combination of elements of a partial basis of orth onormal vectors. The partial basis included an element corresponding to the [normalized] ∆ ϕprofile ( ≡˜Vo). Additional basis vectors orthogonal to it,/braceleftBig ˜Vi/bracerightBig i=1,Nb−1were derived from ∆ ϕand Legendre polynomials {Pi}i=0,Nb−1using Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization [27]. The number of basis vectors Nbwas of order 101, whereas the dimension of the vector space Nwas of order 103, soNb<< N , and we find: ˜ϕ21=Nb−1/summationdisplay i=0ai˜Vi (8) The coefficient of ˜V0in this linear combination, a0, was proportional to the value for Robtained from that data set. The coefficients of the linear combination were determined us ing linear least squares fitting and by simple projection 4of ˜ϕ21onto the vectors of the partial basis, with identical result s. The number of elements in the basis set was varied, but the coefficients obtained from the least squares fit remain ed the same regardless of the size of the basis set. Using this second data analysis method, we thus determined t wo values of R, one from each data set. It was not possible to estimate uncertainties for the individual v alues of Rfrom the vector analysis method. Uncertainty estimates from the least squares analyses were unrealistic ally small because the vector analysis could not account for the effect of a non-zero projection of the magnetic field dr ifts along the Rb magnetization-induced phase profile vectors. We take the value of Rto be the mean of the results for the two data sets, and we coars ely estimate the uncertainty of Ras the deviation of the two values, to obtain R= 0.1287±0.0036. This result agrees well with that of the first method of data analysis. For computing κ21we will use the result from the first method of analysis since the error estimate is probably more reliable. We can compute the magnetic field drift profile by subtracting from ˜ϕ21its projection on the Rb magnetization basis profile ˜V0: ˜δB=1 γ21d dt/parenleftBig ˜ϕ21−/parenleftBig ˜ϕ21·˜Vo/parenrightBig ˜Vo/parenrightBig (9) Note that the profile ˜δBis the magnetic field drift orthogonal to˜V0. The drift profile from the second data set is plotted in Fig. 5; the time derivative of the [discretely sam pled] profile was estimated by finite difference. Note that the field was stable to about ±3 ppm RMS. Having obtained a value for R, we can then solve eqn (7) for κ21in terms of measured parameters, since κ3is known [18]. However, κ21is expected to be temperature-dependent [18,20] and so the t emperature at which the experiment was carried out must be reported along with the value of κ21. The Rb and noble gas temperature indicated by the hot air temperature control system was in error, because: th e absolute calibration was poorly known; and the cell was heated by the LDA to a temperature higher than that indica ted by the control system. Thus, it was necessary to deduce the noble gas/Rb vapor temperature from the contac t shift data, and the known3He enhancement factor (with its known temperature dependence), in a self-consist ent way. This was achieved by first noting that the mean slope change ∆ Mis related to the enhancement factors and the Rb magnetizati on via ∆M= 2γ38π 3|(κ3−κ21)MRb(T)| (10) where |MRb(T)|(see eqn (3) above) is a known function of temperature. The Rb number density [ Rb] is related to temperature by [26] [Rb] =109.318−4040 T (1.38·10−17)·Tcm−3(T inoK) (11) The measured temperature dependence of the3He enhancement factor is [18] κ3= 4.52 + 0 .00934 [ T(oC)] (12) Substituting (11) and (3) into (10) yields an equation relat ingκ21and temperature (and known/measured parameters). Substituting (12) into (7) yields another equation relatin gκ21and temperature. This system of two [nonlinear] equations and two unknowns can be solved to yield the tempera ture and κ21. The temperature determination depends strongly on the enhancement factor, while the enhan cement factor determination depends only weakly on the temperature (via the known temperature dependence of κ3). Thus, an iterative method to compute the temperature rapidly converges: an initial guess for the temperature ena bles calculation of κ21, which in turn permits calculation of the Rb magnetization and thus the system temperature. This c orrected temperature is used to re-compute a better estimate for κ21, which is used to re-compute a better estimate of the Rb magne tization, etc. Using the result R= 0.1262±0.0025 from the slope difference analysis, we determine the con tact shift enhancement factor for Rb and21Ne to be κ21= 31.8±2.8 at a temperature of (124 .8±1.9)oC. Note that the noble gas/Rb vapor temperature is much higher than the value of 112oC indicated by the hot air temperature control system, presu mably the result of heating by the laser diode array. We are not awar e of a previous measurement of the Rb-21Ne contact shift. Walker estimated the Rb-21Ne enhancement factor to be 38, and the ratio of the Rb-21Ne and Rb-3He enhancement factors to be 4.3 [20]. We report this ratio to be 5 .6±0.5. The 3% uncertainty in Rdominates other sources of error, inducing a 9% uncertainty inκ21. The contribution to the uncertainty in κ21resulting from the 1 .5% uncertainty in the He enhancement factor κ3is only 1 .5%, which is negligible. The uncertainty in temperature induced a 0 .3% uncertainty in κ21. To the extent that the cell could be described as an ellipsoid of revolution, its deviation from sphericality induced an uncertainty of 0 .15% in κ21with zero systematic correction. 5The claim of zero systematic correction of the classical mag netization field shift for a ellipsoidal cell is justified by noting that: i) the classical magnetization field inside a n ellipsoid of uniform magnetization is uniform, with its magnitude depending on the ellipsoid’s shape and the rel ative orientation of the ellipsoid major axis and the magnetization vector; and ii) when the ellipsoid major axis is oriented at the magic angle θm= cos−1/parenleftbig 1/slashbig√ 3/parenrightbig with respect to the magnetization direction, the component of th e classical magnetization field parallel to the magnetizati on is exactly that of a spherical distribution with the same mag netization, regardless of the ellipsoid’s shape. We orient ed the cell at θmin order to suppress quadrupole wall shifts, with an uncerta inty of about 10o. The 10ouncertainty in orientation leads to the estimated uncertainty of 0 .15% in κ21due to measured asphericality of the cell. IV. SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVED MEASUREMENTS; CONCLUSIONS There are straightforward improvements that could be imple mented to reduce the uncertainty in the present mea- surement. The experiment was conducted in the course of deve loping a21Ne/3He dual Zeeman maser, so that opportunity for taking contact shift data was very limited. A factor of three improvement in the result could easily be achieved just by taking ten times more data. Active field st abilization using an independent magnetometer [18] would essentially eliminate field drift, reducing statisti cal uncertainty in the measurement to that due to phase noise , a factor of >0.03/0.001 = 30 reduction. Active field stabilization would also per mit a reduction in the phase noise since the signal acquisition bandwidth could be reduced by a t least a factor of 3, so that the statistical uncertainty could be reduced by about a factor of 300 compared to the prese nt experiment. This uncertainty would already be less than the uncertainty contributed by cell asphericalit y (0.15%). However, the absolute uncertainty in the Rb-21Ne contact shift enhancement factor κ21would then be limited by the uncertainty in that for He, κ3, 1.5%, whereas the ratioκ21/κ3would be known to an uncertainty of only a few tenths of one per cent. It should be possible to measure ratios of alkali-noble gas e nhancement factors to a level well below a part in 103if one could completely eliminate effects of the classical ma gnetization field shift. We have already shown that one can use differential magnetometry to obtain data from whi ch classical magnetization field shifts are eliminated to high precision. It can be shown that using a three-species noble gas maser, one could measure the contact shift enhancement factor of a third species if the other species’ e nhancement factors are known, independent of the classical magnetization field shift . Even though it has not yet been done, we believe it is a straig htforward matter to implement a three-species maser in a single-bulb glass cell. A comprehensive set of contact shift data would serve as a pro be of noble gas-alkali interaction potentials [20]. A program using multi-species noble gas masers to measure co ntact shift ratios could be implemented using129Xe, 83Kr,21Ne, and3He along with K, Cs, and Rb in turn. Na would be a poor candidate for use in a noble gas maser because of its relatively low vapor pressure. The remaining stable noble gas isotope,131Xe, cannot be used with the other noble gases in a multi-species maser because its nucle ar dipole moment has a sign opposite to that of the others (making it impossible to achieve a population inversion sim ultaneously with the other species). However, it may be possible to measure the131Xe precession frequency in free induction decay in the prese nce of two other noble gas masers. There are no other stable noble gas isotopes having n on-zero nuclear spin. Contact shift ratios would be converted to absolute values f or enhancement factors by using the measured values for3He/Rb [18] and3He/K [19]. The enhancement factor for3He/Cs has not yet been measured. Measuring contact shift ratios to a few parts in 104could proceed as follows: one would first measure the ratio of the enhancement factors of83Kr and129Xe to each other. The contact shift enhancement factors for83Kr and 129Xe are estimated by Walker to be about 230 and 730, respective ly [20]. Using an independent magnetometer with the colocated Xe-Kr masers, the ratio of the [large] enhance ment factors of Xe and Kr could be measured to a few parts in 104even if the classical magnetization field were accounted for only to the 10% level (which can be done trivially- a ∼1% accounting is claimed in this work). Triple masers using K r and Xe, along with21Ne and3He in turn would yield high-precision measurements of the ratios of all the enhancement factors; the known enhancement factor for He would then determine the absolute values of the other enhancement factors. Temperature dependences could of course also be measured. In particular, enhancemen t factor ratios as a function of density (normalized to some experimental reference density) could be determined t o very high precision. Improved cell thermometry would eliminate the need to depend on a temperature-density calib ration [26] to determine the cell temperature. Also, for very high precision measurements, control of the noble gas m agnetization fields would have to be maintained more carefully than in the present work; in particular, the time b etween polarization reversals could be decreased in order to increase the relative size of the contact shifts in compar ison to noble gas polarization induced frequency shifts. It might also be important to account carefully for the contrib ution of van der Waals molecule formation to the contact frequency shifts. Finally, we remark that a two species maser using3He and21Ne has been proposed for a high precision test of 6local Lorentz invariance (LLI) [17], in which Rb-noble gas c ontact shifts would be an important systematic effect. Adding a co-located129Xe maser would provide a high precision in situ measurement of the Rb magnetization. With part-in-104knowledge of the enhancement factors, the systematic effect s of contact shifts on a search for LLI violation could be rendered negligible with the use of the129Xe maser ”co-polarimeter”. We thank T. Chupp for the use of the21Ne/3He cell, and gratefully acknowledge D. Phillips and D. Bear f or useful conversations. [1] M.A. Bouchiat, T.R. Carver, and C.M. Varnum, Phys. Rev. L ett.5, 373 (1960) [2] T. Walker and W. Happer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 629 (1997) [3] K. Abe et. al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 26 (1997); Phys. Lett. B 404, 377 (1997) [4] G.L. Greene, A.K. Thompson, and M.S. Dewey, Nucl. Inst. M eth. A 356, 177 (1995) [5] M.S. Albert, G.D. Cates, B. Driehuys, W. Happer, B. Saam, C.S. Springer Jr., and A. Wishnia, Nature 370, 199 (1994); H. Middleton, L.W. Hedlund, G.A. Johnson, K. Juvan, J. Schwa rtz, Magn. Reson. Med. 33, 271 (1995) [6] G. R. Davies, T. K. Halstead, R. C. Greenhow, and K. J. Pack er, Chem. Phys. Lett. 230, 239 (1994); B. R. Patyal et al., J. Magn. Reson. 126, 58 (1997); M. Bock, Magn. Reson. Med. 38, 890 (1997); D. M. Schmidt et al., J. Magn. Reson. 129, 184 (1997); H.U. Kauczor, R. Surkau, T. Roberts, Euro. Radio l.8, 820 (1998), and references therein. [7] C.H. Tseng, G.P. Wong, V.R. Pomeroy, R.W. Mair, D.P. Hint on, D. Hoffmann, R.E. Stoner, F.W. Hersman, D.G. Cory, and R.L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3785 (1998) [8] R.W. Mair, D.G. Cory, S. Peled, C.H. Tseng, S. Patz, R.L. W alsworth, J. Magn. Reson. 35, 478 (1998); R.W. Mair, G.P. Wong, D. Hoffmann, M.D. Hurlimann, S. Patz, L.M. Schwartz, R. L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3324 (1999). [9] T.E. Chupp, R.J. Hoare, R.L. Walsworth, and Bo Wu, Phys. R ev. Lett. 72, 2363 (1994) [10] R.E. Stoner, M.A. Rosenberry, J.T. Wright, T.E. Chupp, E.R. Oteiza, and R.L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3971 (1996) [11] M.V. Romalis and W. Happer, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1385 (1999) [12] D. Bear, T.E. Chupp, K. Cooper, S. DeDeo, M. Rosenberry, R.E. Stoner, and R.L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. A 57, 5006 (1998) [13] T.E. Chupp and R.J. Hoare, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2261 (1990) [14] T.E. Chupp, R.J. Hoare, R.A. Loveman, E.R. Oteiza, J.M. Richardson, M.E. Wagshul, A.K. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1541 (1989) [15] T.G. Vold, F. Raab, B. Heckel, and E.N. Fortson, Phys. Re v. Lett. 52, 2229 (1984) [16] V.A. Kostelecky and C.D. Lane, Phys. Rev. D 60, 116010 (1999) [17] R.E. Stoner, in CPT and Lorentz Symmetry , V.A. Kostelecky, ed., World Scientific, Singapore (1999), p. 201 [18] M.V. Romalis and G.D. Cates, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3004 (1998) [19] A. Ben-Amar Baranga, S. Appelt, M.V. Romalis, C.J. Eric kson, A.R. Young, G.D. Cates, and W. Happer, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2801 (1998) [20] T.G. Walker, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4959 (1989) [21] W. Happer and W.A. van Wijngaarden, Hyperfine Int. 38, 435 (1987) [22] W. Happer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 169 (1972) [23] S.R. Schaefer, G.D. Cates, Ting-ray Chien, D. Gonatas, W. Happer, and T.G. Walker, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5613 (1989) [24] T.E. Chupp, private communication [25] W. Zu, S.R. Schaefer, G.D. Cates, and W. Happer, Phys. Re v. A37, 1161 (1988) [26] C.B. Alcock, V.P. Itkin, and M.K. Horrigan, Canadian Me tallurgical Qtrly 23, 309 (1984) [27] K. Hoffman and R. Kunze, Linear Algebra , Prentiss-Hall, Inc. (1971), p. 280 7LDA λ/4 Maser Bulb795 nm Main Solenoid(T = 125 C)Bo Beam ExpanderNested Magnetic Shields Preamp External ResonatorPickup Coil ~0 Hz0.025 HzSynthesizers 9459 Hz A/D ConverterH Maser Reference Phase-Sensitive Current SourceFrequency 980 Hz FIG. 1. The21Ne/3He dual Zeeman maser. The device operates similarly to the129Xe/3He maser [10], except that the 21Ne/3He maser employs a single- rather than a double-bulb cell. Co -located ensembles of noble gas atoms are polarized by spin exchange collisions with optically pumped Rb atoms. Pr ecession of polarized atoms excites current in nearby induc tive pickup coils, which are part of a circuit tuned with resonanc es near the Larmor precession frequencies of the two noble ga s species. The current induces magnetic fields which act back o n the precessing atoms, providing feedback for maser oscill ation. 8-10-50510Ne maser phase in radians 1200 800 400 0 Time in seconds FIG. 2. Example21Ne maser phase profile from one (of two) measurement scans. Ph ase dependence linear in time has been removed. -30-20-1001020He maser phase in radians 1200 800 400 0 Time in seconds FIG. 3. Example3He maser phase profile measured simultaneously with the data of Fig. 2. Phase dependences linear in time have been removed. Note the considerable distortion in this phase curve due to magnetic field drift. 980 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80Combined maser phase in radians 1200 800 400 0 Time in seconds FIG. 4. The combined phase ∆ ϕof the two masers as per eqn (5). This profile is proportional t o the phase variation induced by the Rb-noble gas contact shift alone. The sawtooth shape a rises from periodic reversal of the Rb polarization, which r everses the Rb-noble gas contact frequency shift. The highly regula r shape of the difference curve reflects the fact that magnetic field drift effects are subtracted out. -15-10-5051015Magnetic field drift in µG 1200 800 400 0 Time in seconds FIG. 5. Magnetic field drift during the measurements of Figs. 2 and 3, computed from eqn (9). The field strength was 3 G, so that the fractional RMS stability of the magnetic field was about 3 ppm. Field drift was the dominant source of experimen tal error. 10

arXiv:physics/0007086v1 [physics.gen-ph] 28 Jul 2000HOW HIGH THE TEMPERATURE OF A LIQUID BE RAISED WITHOUT BOILING? ‡Mala Das, B. K. Chatterjee⋆, B. Roy and S. C. Roy† ‡Department of Physics, Bose Institute ‡93 / 1 A. P. C. Road, Calcutta 700009, India ‡Lines to be deleted from the manuscript for blindfold refere eing Abstract How high a temperature of a liquid be raised beyond its boilin g point with- out vaporizing (known as the limit of superheat) is an intere sting subject of investigation. A new method of finding the limit of superheat of liquids is pre- sented here. The superheated liquids are taken in the form of drops suspended in a dust free gel. The temperature of the superheated liquid is increased very slowly from room temperature to the temperature at which the liquid nucleates to boiling. The nucleation is detected acoustically by a sen sitive piezo-electric transducer, coupled to a multi channel scaler (MCS) and the n ucleation rate is observed as a function of time. The limit of superheat measur ed by the present method supersedes other measurements and theoretical pred ictions in reaching the temperature closest to the critical temperature of the l iquids. PACS numbers: 64.60.-i, 64, 64.70.Fx, 64.60.Qb, 64.60.My 1Any fluid that exists in the liquid form above its boiling temp erature is said to be superheated. These liquids are in a metastable state in th e thermodynamic sense and can be nucleated to form vapor by homogeneous nucleation or by the presence of heterogeneous nucleation sites such as gas pockets, vapo r bubbles, solid impurities etc. or by the radiation interactions caused by charged part icles, neutrons etc. Vapor embryos of different sizes, which are responsible for homoge neous nucleation, are produced at thermal equilibrium in the superheated liquid. The superheated state owes its existence to an energy barrier which causes the vapo r embryo to collapse, rather than lead to nucleation, if it is less than a critical s ize. A liquid can not be superheated up to the critical temperatur e, there is a limit to the maximum attainable temperature for any given li quid without boiling. This limit is called the ‘limit of superheat of the liquid’ (T sl), where the height of the energy barrier which maintains the superheated state is of t he order of kT and this temperature is a characteristic of any liquid. In addition t o its importance in basic science, the knowledge of T slis important in a number of industrial operations where a hot, nonvolatile liquid comes in contact with a cold volati le liquid. If the temper- ature of the hot liquid reaches to the limit of superheat of th e cold liquid, explosive boiling would result. This explosive boiling is a potential hazard in damaging equip- ment and injure personnel in the vicinity of the blast [1]. Th e study of T slhas another importance since the discovery of bubble chamber by Glaser[ 2] and superheated drop detector[3]. The operation of this detector depends on the d egree of superheat of the 2liquid, more the liquid is superheated more sensitive is the detector to lower energy radiations[4]. The minimum energy detectable by such detec tor is therefore limited by the limit of superheat of the detecting liquid. The limit o f superheat of liquids can be estimated from the theory and can be measured experime ntally. Theoretical calculations are performed either from the pure thermodyna mic considerations or us- ing the statistical mechanics. Very good and comprehensive reviews on homogeneous nucleation of lquid and on the limit of superheat are availab le in literature[5,6,7]. One has to note that theoretical calculations are performed for ’pure’ homogeneous nucleation where the chance of heterogeneous nucleation ar ising out of various in- terfaces with different surface energies e.g. gas-liquid, l iquid-liquid, solid-gas etc. is completely excluded. Experimental results reported so far are far below the criti cal temperature of the liquids. One of the reasons being that observing ’pure’ h omogeneous nucleation experimentally, without any chance of heterogeneous nucle ation is difficult to achieve. Hence, the goal is to reduce the chance of heterogeneous nucl eation as far as possible and to use an improved method of quantitative detection of nu cleation to see how close one can reach experimentally to the predicted limit of superheat. The present experiment is designed to achieve this goal. Superheated sa mple used in this inves- tigation is a homogeneous suspension of superheated drops o f three liquids (R-12 : CCl2F2, R-114 : C2Cl2F4and R-22 : CHCl F2) in a dust free, visco-elastic, degassed gel medium. Suspending the superheated liquid in another li quid (gel) reduces the 3chance of heterogeneous nucleation. Nucleation is detecte d acoustically by a piezo- electric transducer[8] and the pulses thus received are dig itized and recorded as a function of time by a multichannel scaler. This improved met hod of determining T sl supersedes all other measured values in reaching closest to the critical temperatures. Reviews on previous experimental techniques of measuring t he limit of superheat of liquid have been described in detail by Avedisian[6]. As has been found from this literature, all previous experiments except one rely on the qualitative observation of the nucleation visually and therefore the present measurem ent constitutes the first quantitative measurement of T slusing digital electronics. The limit of superheat can be estimated either from the therm odynamic sta- bility theory or from the analysis of the dynamics of formati on of the critical sized vapor embryos (statistical mechanical theory). The superh eated state of a liquid is a metastable state and the limit of this metastable state i s represented on the P-V diagram by the spinodal curves. For a pure liquid, the spi nodal curve or the thermodynamic limit of superheat is defined by states for whi ch /parenleftBiggdP dV/parenrightBigg T= 0 (1) Temperley[9] calculated the value of maximum superheat tem perature using van der Waals’ equation of state. The maximum limit of superheat of a given liquid can be expressed as tm=27Tc 32(2) 4where t mis the limit of superheat of the liquid . For mathematical sim plicity this has been calculated by considering the ambient pressure to b e zero. At atmospheric pressure i.e. at P=1, t mwill be slightly greater than the corresponding value at P=0. Other equations of state such as modified Bertholet equa tion and Redlich- Kwong equation have also been used to calculate the limit of s uperheat[5]. As has been observed by Blander and Katz[5], experimental values o f thermodynamic limit clearly exceeded the Van der Waals limit at least for five liqu ids. For most of the organic liquids the thermodynamic limit of su perheat can be represented empirically[1] by Tsl=Tc[0.11(P/P c) + 0.89] (3) where T cis the critical temperature, P cis the critical pressure and P is the ambient pressure. Another method of estimating T slusing statistical mechanics involves consid- erations of the rate processes of nucleation to form vapor em bryos in a superheated liquid. This method does not yield an absolute value of T slbut it allows one to esti- mate the probable rate of formation of critical-sized vapor embryos in a superheated liquid at a given temperature. If the rate is very low within t he time scale of the experiment, one considers no nucleation would occur, while if the rate is very high, then one assumes that T slhas been reached. The rate of homogeneous nucleation 5(J) as given approximately by the Volumer-Doring formula is given by[1] J=Nfexp−/parenleftbiggB kT/parenrightbigg (4) where J is the expected rate of formation of critical sized va por embryos per unit volume, f is a frequency factor which in general is of the orde r of 1011sec−1, N is the number density of molecules in the superheated liquid and B i s the minimum amount of energy needed to form a vapor bubble of critical size as giv en by Gibbs[10] from reversible thermodynamics is B= 16πγ3(T)/3(pv−po)2(5) where γ(T) is the liquid-vapor interfacial tension, Pvis vapor pressure of the super- heated liquid and Pois the ambient pressure. It is to be noted in this connection that which value of J is proper to calculate T slis not defined and therefore one has to make some ’judicious choice’ of a rate which would corresp ond to T sl. A J value of 106nucleation/cm3.sec is often used to define the limit of superheat temperatur e. It is to be noted that all the above discussions are related wi th the classical theory of nucleation. Effect of other factors like diffusion, viscosity and other hydro- dynamical constraints are discussed by Blander and Katz [5] . As has been pointed out by them, contributions arising out of these effects in cal culating T slof pure liquids are not very significant. The experiment is carried out with superheated liquids of R1 2 (b.p. -29.79oC), R114 (b.p. 3.6oC) and R22 (b.p. -40.5oC). The superheated drops are suspended 6in dust free, de-gassed visco-elastic gel. The gel is a mixtu re of ’aquasonic’ gel available commercially and glycerine. A glass vial contain ing the superheated drops homogeneously suspended in gel is placed on the top of a thin l ayer of degassed gel taken in a beaker. The gel in the beaker improves the acoustic coupling between the superheated drops in the vial and the transducer. The bea ker is placed on a piezoelectric transducer with a coupling gel. Some pure gel is placed on the top of the sample and a thermometer was inserted in the pure gel so as to a void any contact with the superheated liquid sample, thus reducing the chance of h eterogeneous nucleation from the liquid-glass interface. The nucleation in superhe ated drops is detected by the transducer, the output of the transducer is digitized and re corded by a multi channel scaler. The vial was wrapped with a heating coil covering the gel and sample. The temperature of the sample is increased slowly from room temp erature and the count rate (dN/dt) is recorded in MCS. As nucleation proceeds, the number of superheated drops are depleted and hence the nucleation rate is normaliz ed with respect to the number of drops present. What we expect ideally is (1 N)dN dtis zero till the temperature reaches the limit of superheat where there will be a sudden in crease in (1 N)dN dt(entire liquid nucleates) and will be no nucleation beyond this temp erature. Considering the experimental uncertainty, one may observe the similar beha vior as presented in Fig. 1. The comparison of observed limit of superheat with other e xperimental results is presented in the table below. The reduced limit of superhe at defined as Tsl/Tc (taken inoK) for these liquids is also presented in the table along with theoretically 7predicted values and other experimental results. observed T sloC Reduced limit of superheat [T sl(K)/T c(K)] Liquid T c Predicted values from Experiment oKPresent Others (eqn.2) (eqn.3) (eqn.4) Present Others. R12 384.5 80.0 72.0[1] 0.84 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.90[1] R114 418.7 120.5 102.0[1] 0.84 0.89 0.91 0.94 0.90[1] R22 369.0 57.5 54.0[1] 0.84 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89[1] 0.89[6] As could be seen from the table, the measured limit of superhe at exceeded the predicted limit of superheat and other experimental val ues. It is to be noted in this connection that all theretical predictions are approx imate as discussed before. Therefore the present experimental measurements indicate the need of improved cal- culation of limit of superheat. That the Van der Waals’ limit is exceeded was reported before by Blander and Katz[5]. This table also gives an usefu l insight about the nu- cleation process. As can be seen from the table, for liquids w ith lower boiling points it is harder to reach closer to the critical temperature. Thi s is quite expected as the chances of heterogeneous nucleation increases in case of li quids with lower boiling points. Whether complete elimination of heterogeneous nuc leation in experimental 8measurement is possible or not is an open question. No other m easurement have been able to reach so close to the critical temperature. It is to be noted in this connection that the limit of superheat of only 14 liquids out of 56 liquid s studied by Blander and Katz [5] hardly exceeded 90% of the critical temperature . Therefore, by reducing the chances of heterogeneous nuclea tion by suspending the superheated sample in another ‘pure’ liquid and using pr ecise electronic measure- ment we have been able to reach closer to the critical tempera ture hitherto unattain- able. Inspite of the fact that theoretical calculations are performed for ‘pure’ homoge- neous nucleation, they fall below the experimental values i ndicate the inadequacy of the present method of calculation discussed here and warran ts improved calculations. ‡[⋆Present address : Chemistry Dept. Univ. of Utah. Salt Lake Ci ty. USA.] ‡[†Author for correspondence : Fax no. 91 33 350-6790, email : scroy@bosemain.boseinst.ernet.in] ‡Lines to be deleted from the manuscript for blindfold refere eing 1. R. C. Reid Advances in Chemical Engineering 12, 199 (1983). 2. D. A. Glaser Phys. Rev 8, 665 (1952). 3. R. E. Apfel US Patent 4,143,274 (1979). 4. R.E. Apfel, S. C. Roy and Y.C. Lo Phys. Rev. A. 31, 3194 (1985). 5. Blander M. and Katz J. L. AIChE 21, 833 (1975). 6. Avedisian C. T. J. Phys. Chem. Data 14, 695, (1985). 97. Basu D. K. and Sinha D. B. Ind. J. Phys. 42, 198, (1968). 8. Apfel R. E. and Roy S. C. Rev. Sci. Inst. 54, 1397, (1983). 9. Temperley H. N. V. Proc. Phys. Soc. 59, 199, (1947). 10. Gibbs J. W. Translations of the Connecticut Academy III, p.108 (1875). 10

arXiv:physics/0007087v1 [physics.bio-ph] 28 Jul 2000Theory of periodic swarming of bacteria: application to Pro teus mirabilis A. Czir´ ok1,3∗, M. Matsushita2,3and T. Vicsek1,3 1Department of Biological Physics, E¨ otv¨ os University, 11 17 Budapest, P´ azm´ any stny 1A, Hungary 2Department of Physics, Chuo University, Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku , Tokyo 112-8551, Japan 3Institute for Advanced Study, Collegium Budapest, 1014 Bud apest, Szenth´ aroms´ ag u 2, Hungary The periodic swarming of bacteria is one of the simplest exam ples for pattern formation produced by the self-organized collective behavior of a large number of organisms. In the spectacular colonies ofProteus mirabilis (the most common species exhibiting this type of growth) a se ries of concentric rings are developed as the bacteria multiply and swarm follo wing a scenario periodically repeating itself. We have developed a theoretical description for thi s process in order to get a deeper insight into some of the typical processes governing the phenomena i n systems of many interacting living units. Our approach is based on simple assumptions directly relate d to the latest experimental obser- vations on colony formation under various conditions. The c orresponding one-dimensional model consists of two coupled differential equations investigate d here both by numerical integrations and by analysing the various expressions obtained from these eq uations using a few natural assump- tions about the parameters of the model. We have determined t he phase diagram corresponding to systems exhibiting periodic swarming and discuss in deta il how the various stages of the colony development can be interpreted in our framework. We point ou t that all of our theoretical results are in excellent agreement with the complete set of availabl e observations. Thus, the present study represents one of the few examples, where self-organized bi ological pattern formation is understood within a relatively simpe theoretical approach leading to r esults and predictions fully compatible with experiments. I. INTRODUCTION To gain an insight into the development and dynamics of various multicellular assemblies, we must understand how cellular interactions build up the structure and re- sult in certain functions at the macroscopic, multicellula r level. Microorganism colonies are one of the simplest sys- tems consisting of many interacting cells and exhibiting a non-trivial macroscopic behavior. Therefore, a num- ber of recent studies have focussed on experimental and theoretical aspects of colony formation and the related collective behavior of microorganisms [1,2]. Theswarming cycles exhibited by many bacterial species, notably Proteus (P.) mirabilis , have been known for over a century [3]. When Proteus cells are inoculated on the surface of a suitable hard agar medium, they grow as short “vegetative” rods. After a certain time, however, cells start to differentiate at the colony margin into long “swarmer” cells possessing up to 50 times more flagella per unit cell surface area. These swarmer cells migrate rapidly away from the colony until they stop and revert by a series of cell fissions into the vegetative cell form, in a process termed consolidation . The resulting vegeta- tive cells grow normally for a time then swarmer cell dif- ferentiation is initiated in the outermost zone (terrace), and the process continues in periodic cycles resulting in a colony with concentric zonation depicted in Fig 1. Sim-ilar cyclic behavior has been observed in an increasing number of Gram-negative and Gram-positive genera in- cluding Proteus, Vibrio, Serratia, Bacillus andClostrid- ium(for reviews see [4–6]). The reproducibility and regularity of swarming cycles together with the finding that its occurrence is not lim- ited to a single species suggest that periodic swarm- ing phenomena can be understood and quantitatively explained on the basis of mathematical models. In this manuscript we first give an overview of the rele- vant experimental findings related to the swarming of P. mirabilis , then construct a simple model with two limit densities. We then investigate the behavior of the model as a function of the control parameters and compare it to experimental results. II. OVERVIEW OF EXPERIMENTAL FINDINGS a. Differentiation. As reviewed in [5,6], the differen- tiation of vegetative cells is accompanied by specific bio- chemical changes. Swarmer cells enhance the synthesis of flagellar proteins, extracellular polysaccharides, pro - teases and virulence factors, while exhibit reduced over- all protein and nucleic acid synthesis and oxygen uptake. These findings may be explained by arguing that the pro- duction and operation of flagella is expensive and may require the repression of non-essential biosynthetic path - ∗czirok@biol-phys.elte.hu 1ways. The largely (10-30 fold) elongated swarmer cells develop by a specific inhibition of cell fission which seems notaffecting the doubling time of the cell mass or DNA. FIG. 1. Typical Proteus mirabilis colony. It was grown on the surface of a 2.0% agar substrate for two days. The inner diameter of petri-dish is 8.8 cm. Gray shades are proportion al to the cell density: the cyclic modulation is apparent. The differentiation process is initiated by a number of external stimuli including specific signalling molecule s and physico-chemical parameters of the environment. As an example for the latter, the viscosity of the surrounding medium is presumably sensed by the hampered rotation of the flagella [7,8]. Neither the signal molecules that initiate the differentiation nor the involved intracellula r signalling pathways are identified yet, but a correspond- ing transmembrane receptor has been found recently [9]. The structure of this receptor, together with other find- ings reviewed in [6], suggest a ‘ quorum sensing ’ regula- tory pathway [10] characteristic for many, cell density dependent collective bacterial behaviors like sporulatio n, luminescence, production of antibiotics or virulence fac- tors [11]. b. Migration of swarmer cells. It is well established [5] that swarmer cell migration does not require exoge- nous nutrient sources, since swarmer cells replated onto media devoid of nutrients continue to migrate normally. The ability of migration depends on the local swarmer cell density as isolated single swarmer cells cannot move, while a group of them can. It was also demonstrated [12] that the mechanism by which bacteria swarm outwards involved neither repulsive nor attractive chemotaxis. The typical swimming velocity (i.e., in liquid environment) of swarmer cells is ≈100mm/h [13] which is also their maximal swarming speed and rate of colony expansion on soft agar plates [5]. In the usual experimental conditions for investigating swarming colony formation the front ad- vances with a speed of 0 .5−10 mm/h [14,9,15,13]. Unfor-tunately, in these cases there is no information available on the velocity of individual swarmer cells, but it must be between the colony expansion speed and the swimming velocity. c. Consolidation. The molecular mechanisms of con- solidation, i.e., the downregulation of the gene activity responsible for swarming behavior [16] is even less known than that of differentiation. If the swarming motility uti- lizes intracellular energy reserves as has been suggested [5], then swarmer cells must have a finite lifetime . In ad- dition to the septation of swarmer cells taking place at the outermost terrace, inside the colony the differentia- tion process, i.e., the supply of fresh swarmer cells must also be shut off. The cessation of swarmer cell production does not seem to be due to severe nutrient depletion since vegetative cells keep growing (although with decreasing growth rate) well inside the colony for many hours after the last swarmer cells were produced in that region [14]. d. Colony formation. The cycle time (total length of the migration and consolidation periods) has been found [14] to be rather stable ( ≈4h) for a wide range of nu- trient and agar content of the medium. The size of the terraces and the duration of the migration phases were strongly influenced (up to an order of magnitude, and up to a factor of 3, respectively) by the agar hardness. The nutrient concentration did not have an observable effect on these quantities from 0 .01% up to 1% glucose concentrations. There was, however a remarkable posi- tive correlation between the cycle time and the doubling time (ranging from 0 .7h up to 1 .8h) of the cells. Two interfacing colonies inoculated with a time dif- ference of a few hours and therefore being in different phases of the migration-consolidation cycle, were found to maintain their characteristic phases [14,15]. Thus, the control of the swarming cycle must be sufficiently local. e. Cycle rescheduling. A few experiments investi- gated the cell density dependence of the duration of qui- escent growth ( lag phase ) prior to the first migration phase. These studies clearly revealed that vegetative cells have to reach a threshold density to initiate swarm- ing [14,15], in accord with the suggested quorum sensing molecular pathway of the initiation of swarmer cell dif- ferentiation. Agar cutting experiments demonstrated that a cut in- side the inner terraces does not influence the swarming activity [15]. However, when the cut has been made just behind the swarming front, the duration of the swarming phase was shortened and consolidation was lengthened by up to 40% [15]. Even more interestingly, mechanical mixing of the cell populations before the expected beginning of consolida- tion expands the duration of the swarming phase consid- erably, by up to 50% [13]. This finding, together with replica-printing experiments [13] demonstrates that at the beginning of the consolidation phase still a large pool of swarmer cells exists and seems to be “trapped” at the 2rear of the outermost terrace. III. THE MODEL Taking into account the above described experimental findings, here we construct a model which is capable of explaining most of the observed features of colony expan- sion through swarming cycles. (i) The model is based on the vegetative and swarmer cell population densities only, denoted by ρoandρ∗, respec- tively. These values are defined on the basis of cell mass instead of cell number, therefore one unit of swarmer cells is transformed into one unit of vegetative cells during consolidation. (ii) Vegetative cells grow and divide with a constant rate r0≈1h−1[14,15]. This will later allow us to establish a direct correspondence between cell density increase and elapsed time. (iii) Usually, swarmer cell differentiation is initiated wh en the local density of the vegetative cells exceeds a thresh- old value ( ρo min≈10−2cells/µm2[14,15]). (Prior the first swarming phase experiments indicate the presence of an extra time period tℓwhich is probably associated with the biochemical changes required to develop the ability of the swarming transition. This effect is present only at the seeding of the colony, thus tℓ= 0 otherwise.) When ρo=ρo minat time t0, some of the vegetative cells en- ter the differentiation process, modeled by introducing a rate r. Since the biomass production rate is assumed to be unchanged during the differentiation process, the rate of producing new vegetative cells is r0−rand the differentiating cells elongate with the normal growth rate r0. (iv) The full development of swarmer cells, i.e., a typical 20-fold increase in length needs a time ( td≈ln 20/r0≈ 3h) comparable with, or even longer than the length of a consolidation period, hence can not be neglected. There- fore, the first “real” swarmer cells, which are able to move appear only at t0+td. (v) The production of swarmer cells is limited in time and the length τof the time interval during which vege- tative cells can enter the differentiation process is anothe r phenomenological parameter of our model. As we here focus on the periodicity of colony expan- sion, we do not consider what happens in the densely populated regions after t0+τ. Specifically, in our model any activity of the vegetative cells ceases in these parts of the system. (vi) Swarmer cells can migrate only if their density ex- ceeds a threshold density ρ∗ min. Above that threshold, swarmer cells are assumed to move randomly with a dif- fusion constant D0. The finite lifetime of swarmer cells is incorporated into the model through a constant rate (r∗) decay.Unfortunately there are no good estimates on these parameters in the literature. According to recent exper- imental observations [17], ρ∗ minis less than 10% of the value of ρoprior the beginning of the swarming phase, i.e., 0 .1ρo miner0td≈10−2cells/µm2.D0may be esti- mated as v2 0tp/2 with v0being the typical speed of swarm- ing cells and tpbeing the persistence time of their motion. Asv0is approximately 30mm/h (see Sec II.b) and tpis in the order of minutes, D0is estimated to be in the order of 10 mm2/h. The above considerations lead to the following set of equations ˙ρo(t) =r0ρo(t) + Γ( t)−Γ∗(t) ˙ρ∗(t) =−Γ(t) + Γ∗(t−td)er0td+∇D(ρ∗)∇ρ∗(1) where the consolidation (Γ) and differentiation (Γ∗) terms are given by Γ =r∗ρ∗and Γ∗=r(ρo, t)ρo. (2) lnρ ρmin ρmino t0ρ0ρ0o t1*ρ tρ ρ =o(r) (r*)(r )0 (D)( )ρ ( *)ρswarmer proliferationmotilitycell densityvegetative cell density consolidationdifferentiation(a) (b) FIG. 2. Schematic representation of the model for swarm- ing colony formation. (a) The two basic quantities are the ve g- etative and swarmer cell densities, which can be transforme d into each other, and changed by proliferation and motility. The dotted lines represent regulatory (threshold) effects: The rate of differentiation is assumed to be dependent on the veg- etative cell density, and the motility of swarmer cells is al so determined by their local density. (b) Notations and typica l time courses of vegetative and swarmer cell densities prior the beginning of the first migration phase. If t < t 0the den- sityρ(orρo) grows with a constant rate r0. After reaching the density threshold ρo min, vegetative cells keep growing only with a rate r0−r, but the total density ( ρ) of the vegetative cells and the differentiating swarmer cells still grows with a rater0. After the time required for the full elongation of a swarmer cell (when ρreaches ρmin),ρ∗becomes positive, and forr∗= 0 asymptotically would grow with a rate r. 3Eqs. (1) can be significantly further simplified by mak- ing use of the possibility to measure elapsed time with the increase in ρo. In particular, neglecting correction terms related to consolidation in areas where ρo> ρo min, i.e., where primarily differentiation takes place, we can cast Γ∗(t−td)er0tdin the form rρo(t−td)er0td=rρo mine(r0−r)(t−td−t0)er0td= rρo miner0(t−t0)e−r(t−t0−td)=rρo(t)ertd(3) fort > t 0+td≡t1. Let us introduce a transformed population density ρas ρ(t) =  ρo(t) for ρo< ρo mini.e., for t < t 0 ρo(t)er(t−t0)forρo> ρo 0andt < t 1 ρo(t)ertdforρo> ρo 0andt > t 1 (4) which is in fact the total density of the vegetative and the differentiating, but not yet fully differentiated swarmer cells (see Fig. 2). With this notation, using (3) and sim- ilar considerations for t0< t < t 0+td, Eqs. (1) can be written into a simple, not retarded form ˙ρ=r0ρ+r∗ρ∗−r(ρ)ρ ˙ρ∗=−r∗ρ∗+r(ρ)ρ+∇D(ρ∗)∇ρ∗, (5) where r(ρ) =/braceleftbigg rforρmin< ρ < ρ max 0 otherwise(6) withρmin=ertdρmin≈10−1cells/µm2andρmax(τ) = e(r0−r)τρmin. If the Γ ≪(r0−r)ρcondition does not hold in the [ t0, t1] time interval, then ρminmust be also treated as a dynamical variable. This case will not be considered here. In the following we use ρfor the char- acterization of vegetative cell density. IV. RESULTS A. Numerical method in 1D The model defined through Eqs. (5) has the following seven parameters: the rates r0,r,r∗, threshold densities ρmin,ρmax(orτ),ρ∗ minand the diffusivity D0. How- ever, this number can be reduced to four by casting the equations in a dimensionless form using 1 /r0≈1h as time unit, ρmin≈0.1 cells/ µm2as density unit and x0=/radicalbig D0/r0≈3mm as the unit length. The resulting control parameters are r/r0,r∗/r0,ρmax/ρmin= exp[( r0−r)τ] andρ∗ min/ρmin. To obtain continuous density profiles, the step-function dependence of Donρ∗was replaced by D(ρ∗) =D0 2/bracketleftbigg 1 + tanh 2 αρ∗−ρ∗ min ρ∗ min/bracketrightbigg (7)withα= 10 providing a rather steep, but continuous crossover. 0510152025 0510152025303540450510152025 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 r t0r t0x/x0 x/x0(a) (b) FIG. 3. Time development of the model obtained by nu- merical integration of the equations, starting from a local - ized “inoculum” at t= 0,x= 0. The continuous line rep- resent the colony boundary (maximal value of xfor which ρ(x)+ρ∗(x)>0). The filled gray and black areas are regions where swarmer cells are motile, and where swarmer cells are produced, respectively. For ρmax= 1.3,ρ∗ min= 0.01,r= 0.3 andr∗= 1.0 the expansion of the system is clearly periodic (a). If we increase the production of swarmer cells by increa s- ingρmaxto 2.0 then the periodicity is gradually lost and a continuous expansion takes place (b). Representative examples for the time development of the model are shown in Fig. 3. The production of swarmer cells is localized, and determined by the density profile of vegetative cells at the end of migration peri- ods. In this particular model ρ(x) is decreasing towards the colony edge, therefore in the migration phases the source of swarmer cells is moving outwards. The front of swarmer cells is expanding from the inside of the last terrace. Because of the decay term Γ, cells become non- motile first at the colony edge. 4B. Phase diagram Each of the dimensionless control parameters can have an important effect on the dynamics of the system. As an example, if the duration τof swarmer cell production is increased, then the consecutive swarming cycles are not separated and a continuous expansion takes place with damped oscillations (Fig. 3b). To map the behavior of the system as a function of the control parameters, the following procedure was applied. Migration periods were identifed by requiring max xρ∗(x)> ρ∗ min. For a given set of parameters we determined the lengths {ti}of the consecutive migration periods, and the system was clas- sified as periodic if the three largest values of the set {ti}were the same within 20%. Otherwise, the expan- sion was classified as continuous as long as max i{ti}was large enough: comparable with the total duration of the simulated expansion. 0.0010.010.11 0.001 0.01 0.1 10.0010.010.11 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 ρminP/ρmin* ρminρminP/ρmin* ρmin 0.41.0 0.1NO EXPANSION CONTINUOUSPERIODIC FIG. 4. Phase diagram of the system as the function of cumulative swarmer cell production density Pand migration threshold ρ∗ minfor various values of swarmer cell decay rate r∗. If the production is high or the motility threshold is low enough then continuous expansion can be observed. On the other hand, if the production is too low or the motility thres h- old is too high then no expansion takes place. In an intermedi - ate regime periodic growth can be observed. The boundaries of this parameter regime are plotted for r∗/r0= 1.0 (thick continuous line), 0 .4 (thick dashed line) and 0 .1 (thick dot- ted line). The thin continuous line represent an approximat e upper bound (10) for cyclic colony expansion. The insert demonstrates that the fourth parameter of the model, r, is irrelevant: for r∗/r0= 1 and r/r0= 0.01 (2), 0.3 (◦), 0.5 (△) and various values of ρmaxandρ∗ minthe type of colony expansion was classified. Open symbols correspond to cyclic growth, filled symbols to continuous growth while dots denot e no expansion. Note that the corresponding regions complete ly overlap irrespectively of the value of r. The behavior of the model is summarized in Fig. 4, where the boundaries of the various regimes are plotted for three different values of r∗/r0. We found, that randρmaxcan be combined into one relevant parameter, the swarmer cell production density, as P=/integraldisplay∞ −∞Γ∗(x, t)dt=r r0−r(ρmax−ρmin),(8) which quantity does not depend on the choice of position x. As the insert demonstrates, for a given P, the actual values of rorρmaxare irrelevant to this kind of classifi- cation in the parameter regime investigated. The general structure of the phase diagram was found to be similar for various values of r∗. For large enough Por low enough ρ∗ mina continuous expansion takes place, while for too small Por large ρ∗ minthe expansion of the system is finite. For intermediate values of these parameters an oscillating growth develops exhibiting well distinguish- able consolidation and migration phases. As the lifetime of the swarmer cells is increased, the parameter regime, in which periodic behavior is exhibited, is shrinked and moved towards lower Pvalues. One can easily estimate the position of the boundary of the non growing phase based on that (i) the width w of the terraces is small (this assumption is justified later, in Fig. 7.), thus (ii) the time required for the diffusive ex- pansion of the swarmer cells is much shorter than their lifetime, which, in turn, is (iii) shorter than the duration of a swarming cycle: r∗/r0∼1. The amount of swarmer cells produced in one period is Pw. Neglecting the decay during expansion, the width w′of the next, new terrace can be determined from the conservation of cell number as 2ρ∗ minw′=w(P+ρ∗ r−ρ∗ min), (9) where ρ∗ rdenotes the swarmer cell density remaining from the previous swarming cycle and the symmetric expan- sion of the released swarmers was also taken into account. To achieve a sustainable growth w′≥wis required, re- sulting in a condition 3 ρ∗ min≤P+ρ∗ r. Ifρ∗ r≪P, as one can expect for r∗/r0∼1, we get for the boundary of the non growing phase P= 3ρ∗ min, (10) which, as Fig. 4 demonstrates, is indeed in good agree- ment with the numerical data. C. Terrace formation. The average length Tof a full swarming cycle was cal- culated by determining the position of the peak in the power spectrum of S(t) =/integraltext∞ 0ρ∗(x, t)dx, the time de- pendence of the total number of swarmer cells in the system. As Fig. 5 demonstrates, the dimensionless cycle time values are widely spread between values of 3 and 12. However, Tisonlysensitive to changes in r0,r∗and ρ∗ min/ρmin, hence it does not depend on ρmaxorτ. 5024681012 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1r0T minρρmin**r r0PRM1BB2235PRM2BB2000 FIG. 5. The cycle time Tas a function of the approximate consolidation rate r∗ρ∗ min. The data collapse indicates that the impact on Tof the other parameters ( ρmaxandr) is neg- ligible. The various symbols correspond to different values of r∗/r0as 0.1 (+), 0 .2 (×), 0.3 (2), 0.4 (◦), 0.5 (△), 0.7 (▽), 1.0 (⋄). The dashed line is a plot of Eq.(12). Circles mark out the assumed parameter values characteristic of four differe nt P. mirabilis strains. The average expansion speed vand terrace size wwere also calculated in the parameter regime resulting oscilla- tory expansion of the colony. First we determined the timet1/3when the system reached 1 /3 of its maximal simulated expansion Rmax=R(tmax), with R(t) be- ing the position of the expanding colony edge and tmax is the total duration of the simulation. The average speed was then calculated for the time interval between tmin= max( t1/3, tmax−5T) and tmax: for the last 5 T long time interval, or for the last 2 /3rd of the total expan- sion, depending on which was smaller. After obtaining vas [Rmax−R(tmin)]/(tmax−tmin), the average ter- race width was calculated as w=vT. Fig. 6. shows the dependence of these parameters on the swarmer cell pro- duction density Pand migration density threshold ρ∗ min. In general, decreasing ρ∗ minor increasing Presults in an increase in both wandv. As Fig. 7. demonstrates, for a given r∗, the relevant parameter controlling wisP/ρ∗ min. The results on the cycle time T(Fig. 5.) can be in- terpreted as follows. As ρ∗ minis a good estimate on the density of swarmer cells in the expanding front, at the end of migration phase the vegetative cell density within the new terrace is given by r∗ρ∗ minT∗withT∗being the duration of the migration phase. Now the length of the consolidation phase, T−T∗, is determined by the require- ment that ρmust reach ρmin: ρmin=r∗ρ∗ minT∗er0(T−T∗)=r∗ρ∗ minT∗ er0T∗er0T.(11) AsT∗≈1/r0, the estimate (11) is simplified to r0T= lnr0ρmine r∗ρ∗ min, (12)which gives a rather accurate fit to the numerically de- termined data (Fig. 5). 00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.40.450.5 0.001 0.01 0.1 100.511.522.533.54 0.001 0.01 0.1 10w/x 0r x0v P/ρminP/ρmin-43.10 10-3 .10-33 10-2 3.10-210-4 10-4-43.10 .10-3310-23.10-210-110-310-1(a) (b)PRM1 PRM2BB2235 BB2000 FIG. 6. Terrace size (a) and expansion speed (b) of the system for r∗/r0= 1 as a function of the dimension- less swarmer cell production density P. The connected points correspond to various values of the migration thresh - oldρ∗ min/ρmin. In general, decreasing ρ∗ minor increasing P results in an increase in both wandv. Only parameters re- sulting in periodic expansion were investigated. Circles m ark out the assumed parameter values characteristic of four dif - ferent P. mirabilis strains. 00.511.522.533.54 1 10 1001.0 0.7 0.5 0.20w/x P/ρmin**r /r =0 FIG. 7. Terrace size wvsP/ρ∗ minfor various values of r∗/r0. Note the collapse of the data presented in Fig. 6a. The terrace size vanishes approaching the parameter regime where no sustainable expansion of the system is possible. 6D. Lag phase 0123456789 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 024681012141618PRM1 BB2235 PRM2 BB2000rT0 L ρ0 minρmin/ ρ0ρmin/ rT0 L [cells / m ]µ2ρ0r/r =0.30 10 10 10 10-6 -4 -2 0(a) (b)r/r =0.0010 FIG. 8. (a) Length TLof the lag phase vs the initial inocu- lum density ρ0fortℓ= 0,r0td= 3 and various values of r/r0 (0.3, 0.1, 0.03, 0.01, 0.003 and 0.001). The transition betw een the regimes separated by ρo minbecomes more smooth for de- creasing r/r0. (b) The experimentally calculated r0TLvalues vs the estimated inoculum density (based on 5 mm and 7 mm inoculum droplet sizes for the RPM and BB strains, respec- tively) and the corresponding fits using Eqs. (13) and (15). Since the duration ( TL) of the lag phase (the time pe- riod before the first migration phase) has been in the focus of many recent experiments, now we turn our at- tention towards this quantity. At least four processes determine TL. First, there is a time tℓassociated with the biochemical changes required to switch into swarm- ing mode. As discussed in Sec. II.a, these processes take place only prior the first swarming phase, and are presumably related to sensing the altered environmen- tal conditions. Second, the cell population must reach the threshold density ρo min(at time t0). Third, tdtime is required to produce fully differentiated swarmer cells (at time t1), and finally, the density of the swarmer cells must reach the migration threshold ρ∗ min. Let us inves- tigate how these parameters depend on the initial inocu-lum density ρ0. Asρgrows with a rate r0until the appearance of swarmer cells, r0t1= max [ tℓ+td,ln(ρmin/ρ0)]. (13) The time development of ρ∗can be estimated by the in- tegration of Eq.(5) with r∗= 0 (i.e., assuming Γ ≪Γ∗) yielding ρ∗(t+t1) =r r0−rρ0er0t1[e(r0−r)t−1]. (14) Therefore, t∗=TL−t1is given by r0t∗=1 1−r/r0ln/parenleftbiggr0−r rρ∗ min ρ0er0t1+ 1/parenrightbigg , (15) an expression usually giving a minor correction to t1. Fig. 8a. shows the above calculated r0TLvsρ0for tℓ= 0. The increase in length of the swarmer cells was assumed to be 20-fold, thus r0td= ln 20 ≈3, which value can be seen for ρ0≫ρmin. In the opposite limit, when ρ0≪ρmin, we have r0TL≈ −lnρ0+const. These rela- tions allow the determination of both r0andr(using the known value of ρmin/ρ∗ min) from the experimental data onTL(ρ0). E. Comparison with experiments Most of the published experimental data are related to the average period length, Tand terrace size w. From these parameters the average expansion speed can be cal- culated as v=w/T, i.e., vis not an independent quan- tity. As we could see in the previous paragraph, from the density dependence of the lag phase the parameters r0, tℓ+tdandrcan be estimated. Notice that this estimate onr0is in principle different from the value obtained by the usual methods based on densitometry in liquid cul- tures. Technically, ρ∗ mincould be also determined [14], but such measurements are not published yet. There are four Proteus strains studied systematically in experiments: the PRM1, PRM2, BB2000 and BB2235 strains (see Table I). To extract the values of the model’s parameters the following procedure was applied. (i) We estimated r0based on lag phase length measurements. (ii) From the calculated r0Tvalues the ρ∗ min/ρminratio was estimated (assuming r∗/r0= 1) based on Eq.(12), see Fig. 5. (iii) Using Eqs. (14) and (15), by a non- linear fitting procedure (Levenberg-Marquardt method, [18], see Fig. 8b.) ρmin,r, and tℓ+tdwas determined. (The latter value is not relevant in respect the periodic- ity of the behavior.) (iv) Knowing ρ∗ minandρmin, from the experimental terrace width data x0andPcan be estimated using Fig. 6. (v) Finally, τis given by r0τ= ln/parenleftbiggPr0 ρminr+ 1/parenrightbigg (16) 7The parameter values of the model are summarized in Table II, together with the predictions on T,vandw. An excellent agreement can be achieved with biologically relevant parameter values. Two classes of model parameters should be distin- guished: (a) the ones which are related to the growth and differentiation of the cells ( r0,r∗,ρmin, and P(r, τ)) and (b) those which depend on agar softness ( D0and ρ∗ min). For a given strain we expect that a change in the agar concentration influences only the latter group, while changes in temperature may affect both, but pri- marily r0. In fact, as Table I. demonstrates, by changing D0and keeping all the other, growth-related parameters constant, we could quantitatively reproduce the colony behavior observed on various agar concentrations. Sim- ilar statement holds for the temperature effects as well, where the only parameter we changed was the growth rater0. V. DISCUSSION Periodic bacterial growth patterns have been in the fo- cus of research in the last few years. Since a colony can be viewed as a system where diffusing nutrients are con- verted into diffusing bacteria, one may not be surprised by the emergence of spatial structures [19]. However, the periodic patterns of bacterial colonies are qualitatively different from the Liesegang rings (for a recent review see [20]) developing in reaction-diffusion systems: the spacing between the densely populated areas is uniform and independent of the concentration of the other dif- fusing species, i.e., the nutrients. The Turing instabilit y is also well-known for producing spatial structures [21], but in that case the pattern emerges simultaneously in the whole system. It is also known, that bacteria can aggregate in steady concentric ring structures as a con- sequence of chemotactic interactions [22,23], but as we discussed in Sec. II., it is established that swarming of P. Mirabilis does not involve chemotaxis communication. Therefore, none of the well known generic pattern form- ing schemes can explain the colony structure of swarming bacteria. As we mentioned in the introduction, oscillatory growth is also exhibited by other bacterial species. One of them, Bacillus subtilis , has been the subject of system- atic studies on colony formation and a number of models have been constructed to explain the observed morphol- ogy diagram (for recent reviews see [24,25]). Only one model addressed the problem of migration and consolida- tion phases: Mimura et al [26] set up a reaction-diffusion system in which the decay rate of the bacteria was depen- dent both on their concentration and the locally available amount of nutrients. The periodic behavior is then a con- sequence of the following cycle: if nutrients are used uplocally, then the bacterial density starts to decay pre- venting the further expansion of the colony. Nutrients diffuse to the colony and accumulate due to the reduced consumption of the already decreased population. The increased nutrient concentration gradually allows the in- crease in population density and the expansion of the colony, which starts the cycle from the beginning. While this can be a sound explanation for B. subtilis , as we dis- cussed in Sec. II., the nutrient limitation clearly can not explain neither the differentiation nor the consolidation ofP. Mirabilis swarmer cells. Another recent study [27] focused on the swarming of Serratia liquefaciens . In that case the structure of the molecular feedback loops are better explored, and were resolved in the model. The production of a wetting agent was initiated by high concentrations of specific signalling molecules. The colony expansion was considered to be a direct consequence of the flow of the wetting fluid film, in which process the only effect of bacteria (besides the aforementioned production) was changing the effective viscosity of the fluid. The wetting agent production was downregulated through a negative feedback loop involv- ing swarmer cell differentiation. This scenario is certainl y not applicable to P. Mirabilis , where swarmer cells ac- tively migrate outwards and their role is quite the oppo- site: enhancing the expansion of the colony. The first theoretical analysis focusing on P. mirabilis was performed by Esipov and Shapiro (ES) in [28]. Their model was constructed based on assumptions similar to ours, and could reproduce the alternating migration and consolidation phases during the colony expansion. How- ever, the complexity of the ES model involves a rather large number of model parameters, which practically im- pedes both the full mapping of the parameter space and the quantitative comparison of the model results with ex- perimental findings. The major differences between our and the ES model can be summarized as follows: (i) we do not resolve the ageof the swarmer population. In- stead, we have a density measure and a constant decay rate implying an exponential lifetime distribution on the (unresolved) level of individual cells. Since the availabl e microbiological observations [5,13] suggest onlythat the lifetime is finite, there is no reason for preferring any specific distribution. (ii) We did not incorporate into our model an unspecified “ memory field ” with a built-in hysteresis . Instead, we implemented a density-dependent motility of the swarmer cells, which behavior has been indeed observed [4–6]. (iii) In our model the fully differ- entiated swarmer cells do not grow , which assumption is probably not fundamental for the reported behavior, but it seems to be more realistic because of the repression of many biosynthetic pathways [5]. Finally, (iv) we do not consider any specific interaction between the motility of swarmer cells and the non-motile vegetative cell popula- tion. Although such interactions probably exist, they are undocumented, and as we demonstrated, are not required 8for the formation of periodic swarming cycles. However, such effects can be important in the actual determination of the density profiles. With these differences, which are not compromising the biological relevance of the model, we were able to mapcompletely the phase diagram, establish approxi- mate analytical formulas and estimate the value of all model parameters in the case of four different strains. In addition, experimental data measured under various conditions could be explained with one particular param- eter setting in the case of the PRM1 strain indicating the predictive power of our approach. Our model is a minimal model in the sense that all of the explicitly con- sidered effects (thresholds, diffusion, etc.) were required to produce the oscillatory behavior, thus, it can not be simplified further. Such minimal models can serve as a comparison baseline for later investigations of various specific interactions. The values of the microscopic parameters of the model can be either measured directly (like r0,ρ∗ min,ρmin,ρmax orr∗) or can be determined indirectly from experimen- tal data (as ρo minandr). Most of these measurements have not yet been performed, we hope that our work will motivate such experiments further examining the valid- ity of our assumptions. In fact, one of the parameters, r∗/r0was set to 1 during the fitting processes, as cur- rently there is no available data to estimate its value. Our numerical results suggest that it is probably larger than 0 .3, and it is unlikely to be larger than 2 (meaning an average lifetime less than 30 minutes). Within this range our qualitative conclusions are valid, while the nu- merical values of the parameter estimates can change up to a factor of 3. The behavior of “precocious” swarming mutants re- ported in [9] deserves special attention. First, we would like to comment on the huge difference found in the value of the transition rate r(see Table II). We emphasize that this is not an arbitrary output of a multiparameter fit- ting process. First, we have reasons to believe, that the motility thresholds of the two BB strains are rather sim- ilar. Knowing the growth rates and the cycle times, Eq. (12) shows us that the difference in the values of ρmin can not exceed one order of magnitude. Assuming then this maximal difference in ρmin,rremains the onlyfree variable in Eqs. (13)-(15), and the fitting can be per- formed unambigously. Thus, we are quite confident that such a large difference exists in rshowing that the rsbA gene (in which these strains differ) influences not only the cell density threshold, but the rate of differentiation as well. It is also interesting to note that in Fig. 8b the be- havior of the PRM2 and PRM1 strains reflect a relation very similar to that of the BB2000 and BB2235 strains. Finally, our calculations predicted a slightly longer cycl e time for the precocious swarming mutant BB2235, whichis also in accord with the actual experimental findings (see Fig 2. of [9]). In our model the assumed functional form of the density-dependence of the diffusion coefficient is some- what different from the most often considered one [24,26], namely D(ρ)∼ρk. (17) The advantage of (17) is that it allows analytic solutions for certain cases [21], however, it describes an unlimited, arbitrarily fast diffusion inside the colony where the den- sity is high. In contrast, in real colonies the diffusion of cells is certainly bounded, and the expansion of the boundary can be often limited by the supply of cells from behind [14]. Therefore we believe that our thresholded formulation (7) is a better approximation of what is tak- ing place inside the real colonies. Finally we would like to comment on the role of nu- triens in the swarming behavior of P. mirabilis . In our model there is a phenomenological parameter ( τ) determining how long the swarmer cells are produced at a given position in the colony. When investigating the dependence of the cycle time on this parameter, as Fig. 5 demonstrates, we found an extremely weak ef- fect. Thus, at least within the framework of this model there is no contradiction between the assumption that the swarmer cell production ceases due to nutrient (or accu- mulated waste) limitations, and the seemingly nutrient- independent cyclic behavior. In fact, this idea can be developed further. By increasing τ(or decreasing the motility threshold ρ∗ min) we arrive into a regime where the migration/consolidation phases are not clearly sep- arable as a motile swarmer cell population exists even when the expansion of the colony is slower. Experiments mapping the morphology diagram of P. mirabilis (Fig. 2 of [29]) showed that there are certain values of agar hard- ness and nutrient concentration, for which the expansion of the colony is still oscillating, but the periodic density changes are smeared out due to the presence of motile swarmer cells in the consolidation periods. If one asso- ciates the increasing agar hardness with increasing ρ∗ min and the nutrient concentration with τthen one can qual- itatively reproduce those (i.e., the PrandPh) regions of the morphology diagram. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS One of the authors (M.M.) is grateful to T. Matsuyama and H. Itoh for many stimulating discussions on experi- mental results. This work was supported by funds OTKA T019299, F026645; FKFP 0203/197 and by grants No 09640471 and 11214205 from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. 9Strain PRM1 PRM2 BB2000 BB2235 Experimental Temperature 32oC 32oC 32oC 37oC 22oC 32oC 37oC 37oC condition Agar 2.0% 2.45% 2.0% n.a. n.a. 2.0% n.a. n.a. Reference [14] [14] [15] [14] [14] [14] [9] [9] T[h] 4.7 4.7 4.0 3.5 8.5 6.0 3.0 3.1 Colony-level v[mm/h] 1.7 0.6 1.0 n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.3 3.3 w[mm] 8.0 3.0 3.8 n.a. n.a. n.a. 10 10 Cellular-level r0[1/h] 0.6 0.6 n.a. 1.0 0.4 n.a. n.a. n.a. TABLE I. Summary of experimental data for four different P. mirabilis strains under various experimental conditions. The value of r0was determined from growth monitoring in liquid cultures. Strain PRM1 PRM2 BB2000 BB2235 Experimental Temperature 32oC 32oC 32oC 37oC 22oC 32oC 37oC 37oC condition Agar 2.0% 2.45% 2.0% n.a. n.a. 2.0% n.a. n.a. Microscopic r0[1/h] 0.53∗(0.6) 0.53∗(0.6) 0.7∗1.0 0.4 1.0∗2.5∗1.5∗ parameters ρmin[cell/µm2] 0.06 0.6 2.0 0.2 (independent) ρ∗ min[cell/µm2] 6·10−36·10−34·10−34·10−3 ρmax[cell/µm2] 0.6 240 3000 2.2 r/r0 10−110−42·10−53·10−2 D0[mm2/h] 20 3.2 6 – – – 60 40 (derived) ρ0 min[cell/µm2] 3·10−33·10−210−110−2 P/ρ min 0.9 0.04 0.03 0.3 τ/T 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.3 ρ∗ min/ρmin 10−110−22·10−32·10−2 x0[mm] 6 2.3 3.0 – – – 5.0 5.0 v0[mm/h] 50 20 27 – – – 85 70 Macroscopic T[h] 5.5 (4.7) 5.5 (4.7) 4.7 (4.0) 3.3 (3.5) 8.2 (8.5) 5.6 (6.0) 2.9 (3.0) 3.2 (3.1) behavior v[mm/h] 1.4 (1.7) 0.5 (0.6) 0.8 (1.0) n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.4 (3.3) 3.1 (3.3) w[mm] 7.8 (8.0) 3.0 (3.0) 3.9 (3.8) n.a. n.a. n.a. 10 (10) 10 (10) TABLE II. Model parameters and the corresponding results fo r the strains and experimental conditions specified in Table I. The model has seven microscopic parameters, the rates r0,r,r∗, the threshold densities ρmin,ρ∗ minandρmaxand the diffusivity D0. For each of the strains r∗=r0was assumed. For comparison, other (derived) microscopic p arameters are also included. The calculated period lengths, terrace sizes and expansion speeds are also presented together with the corre sponding experimental values (in parentheses). The values marked by an asterisk ( ∗) were derived from the lag phase length data based on Eqs. (13) and (15). Note the similarity between the PRM1 an d BB2235, and also between the PRM2 and BB2000 strains. [1] J. A. Shapiro and M. Dworkin, editors. Bacteria as mul- ticellular organisms . Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997. [2] W. Alt, A. Deutsch, and G. A. Dunn, editors. Dynamics of cell and tissue motion . Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1997. [3] G. Hauser. ¨Uber F¨ aulnissbacterien und deren Beziehun- gen zur Septic¨ amie . F. G. W. Vogel, Leipzig, 1885. [4] F.D. Williams and R.H. Schwarzhoff. Nature of the swarming phenomenon in Proteus .Ann. Rev. Microbiol. , 32:101–122, 1978. [5] C. Allison and C. Hughes. Bacterial swarming: an ex- ample of procaryotic differentiation and multicellular be- haviour. Sci. Progress , 75:403–422, 1991. [6] G. M Fraser and C. Hughes. Swarming motility. Cur.Opin. Microbiol. , 2:630–635, 1999. [7] C. Allison, H-C. Lai, D. Gygi, and C. Hughes. Cell differ- entiation of Proteus mirabilis is initiated by glutamine, a specific chemoattractant for swarming cells. Mol. Micro- biol., 8:53–60, 1993. [8] L. McCarter and M. Silvermann. Surface-induced swarmer cell differentiation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus . Mol. Microbiol. , 4:1057–1062, 1990. [9] R. Belas, R. Schneider, and M. Melch. Characterization ofProteus mirabilis precocious swarming mutants: Iden- tification of rsbA, encoding a regulator of swarming be- havior. J. Bacteriol. , 180:6126–6139, 1998. [10] C. Fuqua, S. C. Winans, and E. P. Greenberg. Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: The luxR-luxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. , 50:727–751, 1996. [11] J. A. Shapiro. Thinking about bacterial populations as multicellular organisms. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. , 52:81–104, 1998. 10[12] F.D. Williams, D. M. Anderson, P. S. Hoffman, R. H. Schwarzhof, and S. Leonard. Evidence against chemo- taxis in swarming of Proteus mirabilis .J. Bacteriol. , 127:237–248, 1976. [13] T. Matsuyama, Y. Takagi, Y. Nakagawa, H. Itoh, J. Wakita, and M. Matsushita. Dynamic aspects of the structured cell population in a swarming colony of Pro- teus mirabilis .J. Bacteriol. , 182:385–393, 2000. [14] O. Rauprich, M. Matsushita, C. J. Weijer, F. Siegert, S. E. Esipov, and J. A. Shapiro. Periodic phenomena in Proteus mirabilis swarm colony development. J. Bacte- riol., 178:6525–6538, 1996. [15] H. Itoh, J.-I. Wakita, T. Matsuyama, and M. Matsushita. Periodic pattern formation of bacterial colonies. J. Phys. Soc. Japan , 68:1436–1443, 1999. [16] A. Dufour, R. B. Furness, and C. Hughes. Novel genes that upregulate the Proteus mirabilis flhDC master operon controlling flagellar biogenesis and swarming. Mol. Microbiol. , 29:741–751, 1998. [17] M. Matsushita, unpublished results. [18] W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes, 2nd edition . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992. [19] M.C. Cross and P.C. Hohenberg. Pattern formation out- side of equilibrium. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 65:2, 1993. [20] T. Antal, M. Droz, J. Magnin, Z. R´ acz, and M. Zrinyi. Derivation of the Matalon-Packter law for Liesegang pat- terns. J. Chem. Phys. , 109:9479–9486, 1998. [21] J. D. Murray. Mathematical Biology . Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1989. [22] L. Tsimring, H. Levine, I. Aranson, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Co-hen, O. Shochet, and W.. N. Reynolds. Aggregation pat- terns in stressed bacteria. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 75:1859–1862, 1995. [23] D.E Woodward, R. Tyson, M.R. Myerscough, J.D. Mur- ray, E.O. Budrene, and H.C. Berg. Spatio-temporal pat- terns generated by Salmonella typhimurium .Biophys. J. , 68:2181, 1995. [24] I. Golding, Y. Kozlovsky, I. Cohen, and E. Ben-Jacob. Studies of bacterial branching growth using reaction- diffusion models for colonial development. Physica A , 260:510–554, 1998. [25] M. Matsushita, J. Wakita, H. Itoh, K. Watanabe, T. Arai, T. Matsuyama, H. Sakaguchi, and M. Mimura. Formation of colony patterns by a bacterial cell popula- tion.Physica A , 274:190–199, 1999. [26] M. Mimura, H. Sakaguchi, and M. Matsushita. Reaction- diffusion modelling of bacterial colony patterns. Pre- sented first at the Kyoto Conference on Math. Biol, 1996; Physica A , 282:283–303, 2000. [27] M.A. Bees, P. Andresen, E. Mosekilde, and M. Giskov. The interaction of thin-film flow, bacterial swarming and cell differentiation in colonies of Serratia liquefaciens .J. Math. Biol. , 40:27–63, 2000. [28] S.E. Esipov and J.A. Shapiro. Kinetic model of Pro- teus mirabilis swarm colony development. J. Math. Biol. , 36:249–268, 1998. [29] A. Nakahara, Y. Shimada, J. Wakita, M. Matsushita, and T. Matsuyama. Morphological diversity of the colony pro- duced by bacteria Proteus mirabilis .J. Phys. Soc. Japan , 65:2700–2706, 1996. 11

Development of Rebunching Cavities at IAP C. P. Welsch, K.-U. Kühnel, A. Schempp Institut für Angewandte Physik Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Abstract A focus of work at IAP has been the development and optimization of spiral loaded cavities since the 1970s [A. Schempp et al, NIM 135 , 409 (1976)]. These cavities feature a high efficiency, a compact design and a big variety of possible fields of application. They find use both as bunchers and post accelerators to vary the final energy of the beam. In comparison to other available designs, the advantage of these structures lies in their small size. Furthermore they can easily be tuned to the required resonance frequency by varying the length of the spiral. Due to the small size of the cavities the required budget can also be kept low. Here, two slightly different types of spiral loaded cavities, which were built for the REX-ISOLDE project at CERN and the intensity upgrade program at GSI are being discussed. I. COMMON FEATURES A. General Remarks Large Accelerator facilities very often need to be highly flexible in terms of final energy and the particles to be accelerated. With long linear accelerators – like Alvarez or Wideröe structures – alone, the necessary energy variations cannot be attained. Therefore, single resonators are very often used. They allow changing the energy of the particles as well as the velocity distribution of the beam. Fig. 1: Schematic Drawing of spiral loaded cavity In a cylindrical external tank one or more spiral arms are placed. At their open end each spiral carries a drift tube running along the symmetry axis of the cavity and thus forming several accelerating gaps. Different designs of the spiral arms are possible, depending on the required resonance frequency. The most common structure consists of two semi-circles with radii r and r/2. This design allows easy manufacturing as well as simple adjustment inside the tank – the drifttubes are automatically situated in the middle of the cavity. Somehow more complicated are the “archimedic Type” structures. In this case spirals with constant pitch are used allowing resonance frequencies as low as 27 MHz. B. Characteristic Parameters The transittime factor T indicates the flexibility of an accelerator as the quotient of the effectively experienced voltage and the total gap voltage. The R p-value is defined as the effective cavity voltage squared over the power P put into the cavity. PURUUT2 .Cav,eff p totGap,eff= = With n as the number of gaps, the Rp-value is proportional to n2 in case of the single-spiral structure and proportional to n for a splitring structure. The transittime factor is the product of a velocity dependent and a geometry based term [1] ()() ()() /Gf7/Gf7 /Gf8/Gf6 /Ge7/Ge7 /Ge8/Ge6 ⋅−⋅⋅⋅−⋅⋅⋅=/Gf7/Gf7 /Gf8/Gf6 /Ge7/Ge7 /Ge8/Ge6⋅/Gf7/Gf7 /Gf8/Gf6 /Ge7/Ge7 /Ge8/Ge6 ⋅⋅⋅ += βββπ ββπβλβπ λβπ πλβ 2nsinn2Ta2I1 r85,0sinr85,0dT 0 0V0G where d =width of acceleration gap r =radius of curvature of drifttubes (rout-rin) a =radius of aperture β0 =v0 / c; β = v / c v0 / v =reference / real velocity of particles Fig. 2 shows a plot of the velocity dependent term in case of the 36 MHz 11.4 MeV/u rebuncher built for GSI. The wide spectrum of possible applications is clearly shown in this plot. While many-gap structures are limited to a narrow energy interval, a 2- or 3-gap accelerator can handle even particles with a large deviation from the design energy. This flexibility is characteristic for all of the here presented structures. Figure 2: velocity depend term of the transittime factor The resonance frequency of the structures can also be determined from the geometrical dimensions alone [2]. During the last years analytical solutions for describing these cavities have been continuously developed and allow the calculation of not only the transittime factor, but also the quality factor Q, the shunt impedance and resonance frequency with high accuracy. Without going into the details, it should be mentioned that it is possible to describe a spiral loaded cavity as a transission line loaded with capacitors or as a set of capacitors and inductors. Only the geometric dimensions of cavity and the inner structure are necessary for these calculations and are therefore applicable to all different kinds of structures. Fig. 3 shows the calculated capacity C at each mm of the 36 MHz 11.4 MeV/u spiral in the transfer channel at GSI. Included is not only the capacity between the spiral and the surrounding tank, but also between the two spirals and interaction between the windings of each arm. Figure 3: capacity C between spiral arm and tank In addition to these analytical calculations, all of the above parameters are determined with the MAFIA program. Using the obtained field distributions, the accuracy of the above results can be proven and optimisation of the structures can be done. II. THE INTENSITY UPGRADE PROGRAM AT GSI It is the goal of the intensity upgrade program at GSI to fill the SIS up to its space charge limit. This requires a beam current of up to 15 emA ( 238U4+), which could not be delivered by the earlier system. Therefore the old wideroe structure was replaced by an RFQ and two IH- structures, especially designed to accelerate high intensity, low charge state beams. Special attention had to be paid in the two stripping sections, where high space charge effects are present and focussing elements in both transverse and longitudinal direction are necessary. Figure 4: part of the UNILAC Even though an 108 MHz Rebuncher was already present in the section in front of the Alvarez-linac, it was necessary to counteract the longitudinal defocusing effects. The resonance frequency was chosen to be 36 MHz, like the frequency in the HSI, providing a larger region of linear forces. This low frequency and the given length of the structure with only l=60 cm required a compact structure. At high currents a total voltage of 875 kV was necessary to turn the emittance ellipse into an upright position. In order to avoid sparks, two spirals with constant pitch ("archimedic type") were chosen, shown in Fig 5. Figure 5: View inside 36 MHz 1.4 MeV/u rebuncher The radius of the tank is only r=25 cm , the aperture dap=5.5 cm . Experiments showed that this structure was not stable against external mechanical excitations. With a length of 210 cm each arm was not inflexible enough to resist forced oscillation. Thus two additional copper tubes were fixed on each side of the two spirals. Figure 6: distribution of electric field along axis A number of simulations was done to optimise the particle motion through the buncher [2,3]; always taking into account the various kinds of different ions that are going to be used at GSI. Fig 6 shows the distribution of the electric field along the beam axis. Since all gaps have the same width, the field in the middle gap shows double the amplitude. With a quality factor of Q0=2200 and Rp=9 M Ω the input power needs to be p=85 kW . Another rebuncher had to be installed between the UNILAC and the SIS. In this transfer channel the ions pass through a carbon foil where they get many of their electrons stripped. Strong space charge effects are the result of this process leading to a longitudinal debunching. In order to match the beam into the SIS, a second rebuncher counteracts this divergence. Operated at the same resonance frequency fres=36 MHz , the “archimedic type” structure was chosen again. Since the design energy of E=11.4 MeV/u was a lot higher in this case, the total voltage needed to be only U=650kV which could be fulfilled with a single spiral. Each of the two gaps has a width of 2.2 cm and the diameter of the drifttubes is dap=6 cm . The l=170 cm long spiral has an internal water cooling to secure stable conditions during operations. The quality factor is a little higher in this case Q0=3600 and with a measured value of Rp=4.5 M Ω, an input power of p=94 kW is needed. Both resonators are already integrated into the GSI beamline and are successfully operated. III. REBUNCHER FOR REX-ISOLDE REX-ISOLDE (Radioactive Beam Experiment at ISOLDE) is a new project at the online mass separator ISOLDE / CERN [4]. The structure of exotic and neutron rich nuclei, especially Na, Mg, K and Ca, will be studied. The nuclei have to reach energies in the order of the coulomb barrier. By measuring the arising γ-rays both, static and dynamic properties of these hardly known nuclei can be examined. Figure 7: Part of the REX-ISOLDE beamline In order to accelerate the radioactive beam to the necessary energy, a combination of an ion source, penning trap, charge state breeder, mass separator, an Rfq, an IH-structure and a 7-gap resonator is used [5]. Finally the radioactive beam hits the target with a final energy from 0.8 MeV/u to 2.2 MeV/u. Part of the whole beamline is shown in Fig. 7. Between RFQ and IH a longitudinal match is necessary. Beam diagnostic is done and the beam is matched to the acceptance of the IH structure. Limiting parameter was the total length of only 1.6 m from the exit of the Rfq to the IH. Two quadrupole triplets, the diagnostic box and the rebuncher had to fitted in. Thus the maximum length of the rebuncher tank must not exceed 30 cm. The necessary transformation of the phase space ellipse required a total voltage of 25 kV. Combining flexibility with high efficiency, a 3-gap splitring structure was chosen. Care has to be taken to separate 0- and π-mode from one another. Calculation and Measurements showed that the unwanted 0-mode lies at f0=159 MHz and therefore far enough from the operating frequency of fres=101.28 MHz . Furthermore, the electric field needs to be kept in reasonable dimensions in order to avoid sparking. The result of the calculations is shown in Fig. 8. Figure 8: calculated The inner diameter of the vacuum tank is 35 cm - incorporating two spirals with a length of only l=475 mm each. The beam aperture is dap=6cm as in all other elements of the matching section. Figure 9: View into open splitring cavity This structure was also completed and is today operated successfully in Munich and will be integrated in the REX- ISOLDE beamline at CERN soon. IV. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK During the last three decades, the efficiency and flexibility of rebunching cavities has been more and more developed. The compact size of these cavities clearly separates them from other possible designs. field distribution Easy manufacturing, low input power and stability during operation are the features of these cavities that can be used as rebunchers as well as post accelerators. Different internal structures are possible and depend on the resonance frequency, energy region and the possible size. Future research will optimise present designs with respect to required power input, possible voltages and size. REFERENCES [1] J. Häuser, „Eigenschaften von Spiralresonatoren“, thesis, University of Frankfurt, 1989 [2] C. Welsch „Aufbau und Untersuchung von Spiralresonatoren für den Hochstrominjektor der GSI“, Diplomarbeit, University of Frankfurt, 1999, http://www.carsten-welsch.net [3] W. Barth et al, „High Current Beam Dynamics for the Upgraded UNILAC“, PAC, Vancouver, 1997 [4] K.U. Kühnel „Aufbau eines Splitringresonators als Rebuncher für das REX-ISOLDE Projekt“, Diplomarbeit, University of Frankfurt, 1999 [5] D. Habs et al, „The REX-ISOLDE project“, NIM B 126, 218 (1997)

arXiv:physics/0007089v1 [physics.gen-ph] 28 Jul 2000Unconditionally Secure Quantum Bit Commitment Is Simply Possible A. Mitra V.I.P Enclave, M - 403, Calcutta- 700059. India. February 20, 2014 Abstract Mayers, Lo and Chau proved unconditionally se- cure quantum bit commitment is impossible. It is shown that their proof is valid only for conventional quantum bit commitment protocols, in general it does not hold good. Unconditionally secure entan- gled and unentangled based (two steps and multi- steps) quantum bit commitment protocols are pre- sented. Unconditional security covers unknown at- tacks and attacks arising due to noise. For a single isolated bit, the probability of successful cheating is sharply zero. 1Conventional quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols [1, 2] fail if the legitimate users become dishonest to each other. To re move these difficulty, bit commitment encoding was prescribed so t hat sender can not cheat receiver. To elucidate the issue, let us recall the BB-84 protocol [1], which works on two steps processes. In the first step, sender gives a qubit representing a definite bit value to receiver and in second st ep he reveals the key information regarding the bit value to recei ver. The problem is: sender can flip the bit value by changing the key in - formation although he committed the bit value in the first ste p. This is cheating. However the success of cheating decreases with the number of bits of the key. It was thought bit commitment encoding could detect such cheating. As if in cryptograhic c ommu- nication quantum mechanics could resist a committed partne r to be an imposter. If it be so, the long standing problems of cryp tog- raphy such as secure ideal quantum coin tossing, were also be lieved to be solved. The BB-84 QKD protocol can be called as first QBC protocol. However, authors observed that it is completely insecure ag ainst sender’s EPR type attack. That is, the success of cheating is 100%. Later on a QBC protocol [3] was proposed and claimed to be prob - ably secure against all types of cheating. Mayer; Lo and Chau proved [4,5] it incorrect but message of their work is that th ere can not have any secure bit commitment protocol, although th ey worked on a particular model of bit commitment encoding. Re- cently kent [6] has shattered this belief. He showed that sec ure bit commitment protocol exists. As security of his protocol is b ased on causality not on laws of quantum mechanics, so it seems the pr oof is valid for all quantum bit commitment protocols[7], which do not use causality for security. If it be so, relativity wins over quantum mechanics in cryptography. We shall see quantum mechanics i s not 2too weak to do bit commitment encoding. Let us come to the point why their proof can not be generalized for other quantum bit commitment protocol. Recall the reaso n- ing of complete cheating. They concluded that complete chea ting is possible when two density matrices associated with bit 0 a nd 1 are same i.e ρ0=ρ1. Because of this equivalence of two density matrices, it can be shown from Schimidt decomposition that a fter commit the states |0/an}bracketri}htsender can alone apply unitary transforma- tion U to convert |0/an}bracketri}htto|1/an}bracketri}htand vice versa keeping the receiver in dark about this transformation. But it does not necessarily mean wheneverρ0=ρ1cheating will be possible. Consider the following simple coding technique developed [ 8-9] by the present author. Bit 0−→ {ψ, φ, ψ, φ, ψ, ψ, φ, φ, ψ, φ,....................... } Bit 1−→ {φ, φ, ψ, ψ, φ, ψ, ψ, φ, φ, ψ,...................... }. Suppose these are two sequences of 0◦and 45◦(1:1) polarized states of photons. So ρ0=ρ1. The information regarding the above two sequences are shared between sender and receiver. By sha ring these information they are in effect sharing the Hilbert spac es ofρ0 andρ1. Sender transmits the two sequences at random. But cheat- ing is not possible as receiver can alone recover the bit valu e from the information they initially shared. Bit commitment enco ding is not possible. In fact bit commitment encoding is not neces sary. Both are mutually committed to each other. This probably rev eals that cheating was possible in conventional QBC as because th ey did not share the Hilbert spaces not because of the equivalen ce of density matrices. This was first realized in the initial stag e of the development of alternative QKD[8]. So sharing of Hilbert sp aces can be a precondition to have a secure QBC. First we shall pres ent 3entangled based QBC protocol and then unentangled based QBC protocol. Suppose Alice has n pairs of EPR particles. Taking one par- ticle of each pair, she arranges in a particular fashion and t aking the partner particles she arranges in another way with the he lp of quantum memory. Suppose the two arrangements are : S0=/braceleftBig ψ1, ψ2, ψ3, ψ4, ψ5, .........,ψ (n−2), ψ(n−1), ψn/bracerightBig and s0=/braceleftBig ψn, ψ(n−1), ψn,.................,ψ 5, ψ4, ψ3, ψ2, ψ1/bracerightBig whereψn i=1= 1/√ 2(↑↓ − ↓↑ ). The arrangement of entangle- ment is: 1st particle of the 1st sequence and last particle of the 2nd sequence are entangled, and so on. These two arrangement s represent bit 0. To represent bit 1, similarly she can arrang e them in another two different ways S1=/braceleftBig ψ1, ψ2, ψ3, ψ4, ψ5, .........,ψ (n−2), ψ(n−1), ψn/bracerightBig and s1=/braceleftBig ψ1, ψ2, ψ3, ψ4, ψ5, ..........,ψ (n−2), ψ(n−1), ψn/bracerightBig . The arrangement of entanglement is: 1st particle of the 1st s e- quence and 1st particle of the 1st sequence are entangled, an d so on. The above information is shared between them. Bit commitment encoding can be executed in the following two steps processes. In the first step, Alice commits bit 0 sendin gS0 and in the second step she reveals the key information sendin gs0 . Similarly she can commit bit 1 sending S1in the 1st step and reveals its value sending s1in the second step. Instead of directly sending the 2nd sequence, the results of measurements on 2nd se- quence in a pre-committed basis can also revealed. From the fi rst incoming sequence S0orS1Bob can not recover the bit value. 4He can alone recover the Alice’s committed bit when he will ge t the partner sequence s0ors1. He can measure the spin in a fixed direction. Measurements on two sequences of EPR particle wi ll pro- duce correlated data. Bob’s task is to identify the correlat ion from initially shared information regarding the arrangement of EPR par- ticles. This is essentially bit identification from shared i nformation. If dishonest Alice sends s1afterS0ors0afterS1, the one to one EPR correlation will be lost. Her cheating will be exposed. The above is an EPR based QBC protocol. Using superposition state and following the same operational procedure non EPR b ased QBC protocol is given. Let the supperposition states are: |A/an}bracketri}ht0 i= 1/√ 2(| ↔/an}bracketri}htr+| ↔/an}bracketri}hts) |B/an}bracketri}ht0 i= 1/√ 2(| ↔/an}bracketri}htr+| /arrowbothv/an}bracketri}hts). |C/an}bracketri}ht1 i= 1/√ 2(| ↔/an}bracketri}htr+| տ ց/an}bracketri}hts) |D/an}bracketri}ht1 i= 1/√ 2(| ↔/an}bracketri}htr+| ց տ/an}bracketri}hts). The sequence of the state |A/an}bracketri}ht0 iand|B/an}bracketri}ht0 irepresent bit value 0 and the sequence of state |C/an}bracketri}ht0 iand|D/an}bracketri}ht0 irepresents bit value 1. The preparation of these superposition states are discussed in ref 8. To commit the bit value in the 1st step Alice splitting each stat e| /an}bracketri}ht sends sequence of the truncated state | /an}bracketri}htrwhich does not contain the bit value. The path sis the bit carrying path. Alice keeps | /an}bracketri}htsin quantum memory (using delay). So in the second step Alice sends sequence of the state | /an}bracketri}hts. From the two sequences Bob can recover the bit value. If Alice changes incompatible sequen ce in the second step Bob will be aware . In the above two schemes, bit commitment encoding are two step processes. QBC protocol can be realized in multi- steps proce- dures. In the first step Alice commits the bit value and reveal s the commitment in many steps. Yet the commitment is secure. The 5encoding is same except we need higher dimensional Hilbert s pace to execute multi-steps QBC. As for example they can take GHZ state [11] ( |ψ/an}bracketri}htGHZ= 1/√ 2(| ↑G↑H↑Z/an}bracketri}ht+| ↓G↓H↓Z/an}bracketri}ht) to construct three different arrangements (sequences) G0,H0andZ0. Similarly Alice can arrange G1,H1andZ1to represent bit 1. Alice in the first step commits bit 0 by sending G0and reveal the commitment by sending H0andZ0in next two steps. Similarly she can commit bit 1. If they want to have a multi- steps disentangled based Q BC scheme they can use a linear chain of superposition state of o ur earlier protocol. For three steps (1+2 or 2+1 ) QBC, the super po- sition states are: |A/an}bracketri}ht0 i= 1/√ 3(| ↔/an}bracketri}htr+| ↔/an}bracketri}htt+| ↔/an}bracketri}hts) |B/an}bracketri}ht0 i= 1/√ 3(| ↔/an}bracketri}htr+| ↔/an}bracketri}htt+| /arrowbothv/an}bracketri}hts) |C/an}bracketri}ht1 i= 1/√ 3(| ↔/an}bracketri}htr+| ↔/an}bracketri}htt+| տ ց/an}bracketri}hts) |D/an}bracketri}ht1 i= 1/√ 3(| ↔/an}bracketri}htr+| ↔/an}bracketri}htt+| ց տ/an}bracketri}hts). Alice commits by sending the sequence of states | /an}bracketri}htrand reveal the commitment by sending the sequences of states | /an}bracketri}httfirst and then sending the actual bit value carrying sequence of state s| /an}bracketri}hts. In noisy situation Bob can not expect perfect correlation so Al- ice can execute the protocol dishonestly up to the noise leve l that need not to be bothered. Bob can statistically faithfully re cover the bit value from noise due to initial sharing. The main advanta ge of initial sharing of information of bit preparation is that we do not have to be worried about any unknown attacks. Note that, shar ing means pre-commitment and this can give security even for unk nown attacks. Author feels that unconditional security claim sh ould cover unknown attacks. The BCJL scheme [3] failed because present ly known attack was unknown to the authors. The probability of t he success of cheating is always zero. The security does not dep end on time, space, technology, noise, and unknown attack. The p roto- 6cols are truly unconditionally secure against cheating. If they want secure QKD along with secure QBC they can arrangement the en- tanglement in a more random manner than the above example of arrangements. It is interesting to note that conventional QBC protocol tot ally fails because of entanglement. The same entanglement provi des us secure QBC, although bit commitment is not the problem of alternative QKD. Note that bit commitment encoding can not b e realized in all the sequence of unentangled state but can be r ealized in the sequence of any type of entangled state. For bit commit ment issue, entanglement is not our enemy rather it is our friend i ndeed. Following conventional quantum cryptography Lo and Chau proved [12] that secure ideal quantum coin-tossing (IQC) is impos- sible. This also can not be a generalized conclusion that we h ave already shown in another paper[x]. Our QKD can simply mimic ideal quantum coin tossing if sender and receiver randomly c hanges their status. That is, Alice sends a sequence to produce a 0 or 1 at Bob’s hand at random and Bob sends a sequence to generate a 0 or 1 at Alice’s hand at random. In effect faithful random numbe rs are generated at two distant locations because there is no ch ance of cheating each other. This can be done either by using entan gled state or by unentangled state. Entanglement is not a necessa ry condition to have secure IQC. Secure QBC is built on the top of secure IQC. This is claimed to be always impossible by kent [1 3]. Still IQC is a weaker protocol because all QBC protocols are I QC protocols but reverse is not true. The QBC/IQC and QKD protocols deal two different kind of se- curity -security against cheating and security against eav esdropping respectively. Security of QKD degrades due to noise. Eavesd rop- per can manipulate noise. Recently we have shown [9] noise ca n 7also be manipulated by the users to get rid of noise related se curity problem of QKD. As noise based unconditionally secure QKD is possible, we can have two type of unconditional security in a single protocol. To date there is no other classical or quantum prot ocols which offer this double unconditional security. Therefore p ractical realization of QBC protocols will be a challenging task. Author is greatly inspired by the earlier development of qua n- tum cryptography. References [1] C.H. Bennett and G. Brassard, In Proceedings of IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Process ing, Bangalore, India, 1984 (IEEE, NewYork, 1984)pp 175-179. [2] Ekert, A. Phys. Rev. Lett .67, 661-663 (1991). [3] G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa and D. Langlois, in Proceedings of the 34th Anual IEEE Symposium on founadtions of Computer Science, 1993 . (IEEE, Los Alamitos, 1993)pp. 362-371. [4] D. Mayers, Phy. Rev. Lett .78, 3414 (1997). [5] H. -K. Lo and H. F. Chau, Phy. Rev. Lett .78, 3410 (1997). [6] A. Kent, Phy. Rev. Lett ,83,1447, (1999). [7] C.H.Bennett and D.Divincenzo, Nature ,404247, 2000. [8] A. Mitra, e-print, quant-ph/9812087. [9] A .Mitra. e-print, quant-ph/9912074. [10] A. Mitra e-print, physics/ 0007074. [11] A. Mitra e-print, physics/0007... 8[12] D. Greenberger, M. Horne and A. Zeilinger, in Bell’s theorem, quantum theory conception of the universe , edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer, Dordrecht)p.73, (1989) [13] H.-K. Lo and H. F. Chau, Physica, 120D , 177, (1998). [14] A.Kent, Phy. Rev. Lett ,83, 5382,(1999). 9

arXiv:physics/0007090v1 [physics.gen-ph] 28 Jul 2000Entanlged vs Unentangled Based Alternative Quantum Cryptography. A. Mitra V.I.P Enclave, M - 403, Calcutta- 700059. India. February 21, 2014 Abstract In alternative unentangled based cryptosystem, classical channel can not be used when the system is protected by no-cloning principle. But for the similar security criteria , it is shown that classi- cal channel can be used in alternative entangled based quantum cryptosystem. A prototype of con- ventional entangled based cryptosystem is recovered from alternative entangled based cryptosystem, but such recovery is not possible from alternative un- entangled based cryptosystem. We conclude that entangled based cryptosystem is superior than un- entangled based system. 1Apart from security reason, study on quantum cryptography [1,2] is always important. One of such study is the comparati ve study on EPR and non EPR cryptosystem. This is essentially a study on entanglement vs unentanglement in a particular sit uation. Bennett, Brassard and Mermin [3] comparatively studied con - ventional EPR and non EPR cryptosystems. They concluded tha t these two cryptosystems are same in a sense which type is be- ing used can not be distinguished by others. It follows if sen der uses EPR protocol and dishonestly tells it non EPR then recei ver also can not verify it. In that sense two cryptosystems are in dis- tinguishable. It is recently understood conventional quan tum bit commitment protocol completely fails [4, 5] because of this indistin- guishability of two system. Therefore Bennett et al’s work becomes helpful to examine other cryptographic task. Their work was based on conventional cryptography. Recently alternative non EP R and EPR protocols have been proposed [6,7]. Many conclusions dr awn from conventional quantum cryptography do not hold good in a l- ternative quantum cryptography. So a fresh comparative stu dy is necessary. It is revealed that our unentangled based crytosystem uses m ixed quantum state to encode a bit value but our entangled based sy s- tem uses many pure entangled state for the same. Two systems c an be distinguished by the receiver. Despite these dissimilar ities, they have many similarities. Both can operate on entirely any typ e of quantum channel. Both provide quantum authentication. In b oth the system key can carry meaningful information. Eavesdrop per’s problem is similar for both systems. Bit commitment encodin g is possible [8] for both systems. A single bit can be made secure with- out producing other bits in the two systems. Still the two systems are not well understood. We have seen 2that classical channel can not be used in non EPR system when bit by bit security is sought. This means cryptosystem becom es complete quantum cryptosystem in this security criteria. B ut we do not know whether same is true for EPR system. We also do not know whether conventional cryptography or its prototype ca n be recovered from these alternative systems or not. Here we sha ll see that on these two questions two cryptosystems differ. Consider a source emits pairs of spin 1 /2 particle in their singlet state. One particle of each pair is flying towards Alice and it s alter ego towards Bob. Let us assume that each n pairs reveal one bit of information. Alice and Bon secretly share the information o f two sequences of measurements. Suppose two sequences of direct ion of spin-measurements are: Sn 0={PxPxPyPyPxPyPyPyPxPxPyPx......}and Sn 1={PyPxPxPxPyPyPxPyPyPyPxPx......}, where 0 and 1 in the subscripts stand for bit values and PxandPyare two orthogo- nal directions of measurements. Suppose they jointly decide bit values. The bit values can be decided when both of them use the same sequence of measure- ments. To produce a key both use S0andS1at random on their own sequences of EPR particles. When both use S0orS1, the cor- responding results will be perfectly correlated. But if one useS0 and other S1or vice versa, the results will not be perfectly corre- lated. So 50% bit value choices are discarded (the discarded bits can be used if they do not want to jointly decide the bit values ). The remaining 50% bits form the key. They reveal results thro ugh classical public channel to form the key. In making a key Alice’s measurements yield a sequence of un- rejected data sets:/braceleftBig RA 1, RA 2, RA 3, RA 4, RA 5........../bracerightBig . Similarly Bob’s sequences of data sets are :/braceleftBig RB 1, RB 2, RB 3, RB 4, RB 5, ........../bracerightBig . Half of 3their data sets contain perfectly correlated data. All the c orrelated data sets are unrejected and contain random numbers. Theref ore in the public channel Eve will get many strings of random numb ers. This will not be anyway helpful. Eavesdropper’s problem is to know the secret code of measure - ments. For simplicity, let us think they want to produce a sin gle bit. For simplicity let us think, only Bob’s particles are expose d to Eve. She can directly or indirectly measures using her own sequen ce of measurements. She gets a set of data from her measurements an d taps Alice’s set of data when Alice reveals the results. But t hese two sets of data will neither reveal any bit information nor comp lete in- formation of Alice’s choice of measurements. Now it’s Eve’s turn to reveal the results. The results can not be perfectly correla ted. But this can be interpreted by Alice as a case of non-identical ch oice of bit values. Note that in S0andS1there is a common subsequence Sc. So if Alice does not get perfect correlation, she can check t he data corresponding to Sc. Irrespective of choice of sequences of measurements, two sets of data corresponding to Scwill be always perfectly correlated. This second test exposes eavesdropp ing. Still it is not the last nail to eavesdropping. The data are not secure because public channel is not authen- ticated channel. Eve can impersonate. After Alice’s disclo sure of data, Eve impersonating as Bob can reveal ”fake data” correl ating with Alice’s data. Same thing she can do with Bob’s data im- personating as Alice. Note that this attack works only for ”f ake correlation”. But in their 50% bit value choices, the data ar e not perfectly correlated. Only their reduced data sets corresp onding to Scare perfectly correlated. So initially if they do not get per fect correlation between their data sets, they will get perfect c orrelation in the reduced subsets. As Scis hidden in S0andS1, Eve could not generate ”fake less correlated” data with perfectly ”fake c orrelated” 4sub set of data. This task she can leave for the legitimate use rs. It seems that system fails. There is a rescue. Note that ”fake correlation” attack works as both of them reveal all the data of the same events. The ”fake c or- relation” can not be produced if they don not reveal any data. But the data has to be revealed if the system is to run. If they do no t reveal all the results of the same events, yet the system can w ork but ”fake correlation” attack will not work. For clarity, su ppose they divide the results of each set into two sets. Alice’s sub sets are RA 1andRA 2. Bob’s corresponding sets are RB 1andRB 2. They will reveal the data of non identical sets -that is, either RA 1andRB 2or RA 2andRB 1. As EPR data sets are not revealed so ”fake correla- tion” attack can not work. To create many bits (at least n+1 bits because they have share d n bits), the above produce has to be repeated. This ensures bit by bitsecurity. If any bit is found corrupted the next bit will not b e produced. They reject S0andS1and may try with another two shared sequences. Is it possible to recover existing quantum cryptography fro m alternative quantum cryptography and vice versa ? To answer this query, the basic difference of the two systems should be under stood. In conventional cryptography, a single pure state or single pure en- tangled state represent a single classical bit (0 or 1) or two classical bits (01 or 10). On the other hand in alternative quantum cryp tog- raphy, many states represent a single classical bit. The key of the conventional cryptosystem does not carry meaningful infor mation but it does carry meaningful information in alternative cry ptosys- tem. Therefore recovery of alternative system from convent ional system is not possible. But if we can produce pure state bits w hich does not carry any meaningful information from alternative system 5then at least recovery of prototype of conventional system, if not the same system, will be possible. We have two options - recovery of conventional EPR system from alternative EPR system and conventional non EPR system from alternative non EPR system. The former can be easily rea l- ized in alternative EPR system. We have seen that when both of them use S0orS1, the data are perfectly correlated. These two set of data can make a key provided they are not revealed. Suppose Alice divides the results into three sets RA 1,RA 2andRA 3. Taking the results of same instances( which events will be chosen to con struct the three subsets are not secret) Bob prepares his three subs ets RB 1,RB 2andRB 3. Alice reveals RA 1BobRB 2or Alice reveals RA 2Bob reveals RB 2. Both go through the correlation tests, If correlation is found they know their chosen bit value and side by side they kn ow the unrevealed sets RA 3andRB 3contain perfectly correlated data. To construct R3, it is better to use the data corresponding to Scso that they always get perfectly correlated data even when the y use non-identical sequences of operators. Continuing the proc ess two different kind of keys can be produced - the key does not exist e ven in the mind of users and other key always exist in the mind of us ers. If they want to produce only the former type they can share onl y a single sequence instead of two. On same operation system can run. This will be a sister protocol of conventional EPR cryptosys tem. From operational view point they are different otherwise the y are same. The recovery of conventional non EPR system from alternativ e system is not possible. A sequence of single photon polarize d state produces sequence of results. These results can represent b it value. But if these results are revealed they can not be secure. Why do these two systems respond differently on these two is- 6sues ? The simple reason is that many EPR sequences generate many, two-correlated strings of random numbers but many ide nti- cal sequences of operations on many identical sequences of s ingle photon polarized states yield many strings of pseudo random num- bers. Many sequences of single photon can yield many strings of random numbers provided the input sequences are all random s e- quences or sequences of operations become always random. Bu t in our approach, neither we could use always random sequence s of single photon nor we could share many sequences of random op- erations. That’s why classical channel can not be used to rev eal the results of different data sets those are pseudo-random nu mbers. EPR cryptosystem is always good secure random number genera tor. Throughout our discussion we have struck to bit by bit security. If we do not want bit by bit security but want security of many bits (meaningful) at a time, then such security needs to be proved . In that scenario there may have a possibility of using authenti cated classical channel in non EPR type system. In that eventualit y we can say continuous use of classical channel and bit by bit security are mutually exclusive in non EPR system. In the comparative study, noise was not considered. Recentl y we have presented noise[9] based unconditionally secure qu antum and classical cryptosystems. Therefore our alternative qu antum systems need not to be protected by bit by bit security. Some of the differences discussed above will vanish in the modified EP R and non-EPR noise based protocols. Even the differences between the noise based quantum and classical cryptosystem belonging t o our alternative model, will sometime be blurred. Author is greatly inspired by the earlier development of qua n- tum cryptography. 7References [1] C.H. Bennett and G. Brassard, in Proceedings of IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Computers, System and Signal Processi ng, Bangalore, India, 1984 (IEEE, NewYork, 1984), pp. 175-179. [2] Ekert, A. Phys. Rev. Lett .67, 661-663 (1991). [3] Bennett, C. H. Brassard. G. & Mermin. N. D. Phys. Rev. Lett .68, 557-559 (1992). [4] D. Mayers, Phy. Rev. Lett ,78, 3414,(1997). [5] H -K. Lo and C. F. Chau Phy. Rev. Lett ,78, 3410, (1997). [6] A. Mitra. e-print quant-ph/9812087. [7] A. Mitra. e-print, pysics/0007... [8] A. Mitra e-print, physics/0007074 [9] A.Mitra e-print, quant-ph/9912074 8

arXiv:physics/0007091v1 [physics.comp-ph] 28 Jul 2000Critical dynamics of two-replica cluster algorithms X.-N. Li and J. Machta∗ Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-3720 Abstract The dynamic critical behavior of the two-replica cluster al gorithm is studied. Several versions of the algorithm are applied to the two-dimensional, square lattice Ising model with a staggered field. The dynamic exponent for the full algorithm is found to be less than 0.4. It is found that odd translations of one replica with respect to the other tog ether with global flips are essential for obtaining a small value of the dynamic exponent. 1I. INTRODUCTION The Swendsen-Wang (SW) algorithm and related cluster metho ds1,2,3,4,5,6,7have greatly improved the efficiency of simulating the critical region of a variety of spin models. The original SW algorithm can be modified to work for spin systems with internal symmetry breaking fields8. Spin models of this kind include the Ising antiferromagnet in a uniform field, the random field Ising model and lattice gas models of ad sorption in porous media9. The modification proposed in Ref. 8 is to assign Boltzmann wei ghts depending on the net field acting on the cluster to decide whether the cluster shou ld be flipped. Unfortunately, the modified SW algorithm is not efficient. The problem is that larg e clusters of spins usually have a large net field acting on them and are prevented from flip ping by these fields. An algorithm for Ising systems with fields that avoids this prob lem was introduced by Redner, Machta, and Chayes10,11. In this two-replica cluster algorithm large clusters are constructed from two replicas of the same system and have no net field actin g on them so that they may be freely flipped. The two-replica cluster algorithm has been applied to study the phase transition of benzene adsorbed in zeolites9and is more efficient than the conventional Metropolis algorithm for locating and simulating the criti cal point and the phase coexistence line. Combined with the replica exchange method of Swendsen and Wang12, the two-replica method has been applied to the random field Ising model13. The two-replica method is closely related to the geometric cluster Monte Carlo method14,15,16. In this paper, we report on a detailed investigation of the dy namics of the two-replica cluster (TRC) algorithm as applied to the two-dimensional I sing ferromagnetic in a stag- gered field (equivalently, the Ising antiferromagnet in a un iform field). The TRC algorithm introduced in Ref. 10 has two components that are not require d for detailed balance and er- godicity. We studied the contribution to the performance of the algorithm of these optional components. We find that the complete TRC algorithm has a very small dynamic expo- nentz <0.4. However, we also find that this small value of zrequires one of the optional components and that this component depends on a special symm etry of Ising model in a staggered field. This observation leads to the question of wh ether cluster methods exist for efficiently simulating more general Ising models with fields. We investigated other optional components for the algorithm but these do not lead to acceler ation when fields are present. This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II we introduce th e Ising model in a staggered 2field and describe the TRC algorithm. In Sec. III we define the q uantities to be measured and how errors are computed. In Sec. IV we present the results . The paper closes in Sec. V with a discussion. II. THE MODEL AND TWO-REPLICA ALGORITHM A. Ising Model in a Staggered Field The Hamiltonian for the Ising model in a staggered field is βH[σ] =−K/summationdisplay <i,j>σiσj−/summationdisplay iHiσi (1) where the spin variables, σitake the values±1.Kis the coupling strength and Hiis the magnetic field at site i. The summation in the first term of Eq. (1) is over nearest neig hbors on an L×Lsquare lattice with periodic boundary conditions and Leven. The second summation is over the sites of the lattice. The staggered fiel d is obtained by setting Hi=H ifiis in the even sublattice and Hi=−Hifiis in the odd sublattice. The staggered field breaks the up-down symmetry( σi←−σi) of the zero field Ising model, however two symmetries remain. The Hamiltonian is invariant under even translations: σi+r0←σifor all i (2) withr0any vector in the even sublattice. The Hamiltonian is also in variant under odd translations together with a global flip: σi+r1←−σifor all i (3) withr1any vector in the odd sublattice. Figure 1 shows the line of critical points, Kc(H) for this model. We carried out simulations at three points on the critical line taken from the high preci sion results of Ref. 17, Kc(0) = 0 .4406867952 Kc(2) = 0 .7039642053 Kc(4) = 1 .1717153065 3The basic idea of the two-replica cluster algorithm is to sim ultaneously simulate two independent Ising systems, σandτ, on the same lattice and in the same field. Clusters of pairs of spins in this two-replica system are identified and fl ipped. In order to construct clusters, auxilliary bond variables are introduced. The bo nd variables{ηij}are defined for each bond < i, j > and take values 0 and 1. We say that < i, j > isoccupied ifηij= 1. A bond< i, j > issatisfied ifσi=σjandτi=τj. Only satisfied bonds may be occupied. The two-replica algorithm simulates a joint distribution o f the Edwards-Sokal18type for {σi}and{τi}, and{ηij}. The statistical weight X[σ, τ, η] for the joint distribution is X[σ, τ, η] =e−G[σ,τ]∆[σ, τ, η]Bp[η] (4) where G=K/summationdisplay <i,j>σiτiσjτj−/summationdisplay iHi(σi+τi), (5) Bis the standard Bernoulli factor, Bp[η] =p|η|(1−p)Nb−|η|(6) |η|= #{< i, j >|ηij= 1}is the number of occupied bonds and Nbis the total number of bonds of the lattice. The ∆ factor enforces the rule that only satisfied bonds are occupied: if for every bond < i, j > such that ηij= 1 the spins agree in both replicas ( σij=σij andτi=τj) then ∆[ σ, τ, η] = 1; otherwise ∆[ σ, τ, η] = 0. It is straightforward to show that integrating X[σ, τ, η] over the bond variables, ηyields the statistical weight for two independent Ising model in the same field, e−βH[σ]−βH[τ]=const/summationdisplay {η}X[σ, τ, η] (7) if the identification is made that p= 1−e−4K. B. Two-Replica Cluster Algorithms The idea of the two-replica cluster algorithm is to carry out moves on the spin and bond variables that satisfy detailed balance and are ergodic wit h respect to the joint distribution of Eq. (4). The occupied bonds ηdefine connected clusters of sites. We call site ianactive siteifσi/ne}ationslash=τiand clusters are composed either entirely of active or inact ive sites. If a cluster of active sites is flipped so that σ←−σandτ←−τthe factor Gis unchanged. 4A single Monte Carlo sweep of the TRC algorithm is composed of the following three steps: 1. Occupy satisfied bond connecting active sites with probab ilityp= 1−e−4K. Identify clusters of active sites connected by occupied bond (includ ing single active sites). For each cluster k, randomly and independently assign a spin value sk=±1. If site iis in cluster kthen the new spin values are σi←skandτi←−sk. In this way all active sites are updated. 2. Update each replica separately with one sweep of the Metro polis algorithm. 3. Translate the τreplica by a random amount relative to the σreplica. If the translation is by an odd vector, all τspins are flipped. Step 1 of the TRC is similar to a sweep of the SW algorithm excep t that clusters are grown in a two-replica system rather than in a single replica and only active clusters are flipped. Note also that the bond occupation probability is p= 1−e−4Kfor the TRC algorithm and p= 1−e−2Kfor the SW algorithm. It is straightforward to show that Step 1 of the TRC algorithm satisfies detailed balance with respec t to the joint distribution Eq. (4). Since only active sites participate in Step 1 of the algo rithm, the Metropolis sweep, Step 2, is required for ergodicity. Step 3 contains the optio nal components of the algorithm: an even translation or an odd translation plus flip of one repl ica relative to the other. These moves are justified by the symmetries of the Ising model in a st aggered field stated in Eqs. (2) and (3). When we refer to the TRC algorithm without furthe r specification, we mean the algorithm described by the Steps 1-3 above. In the forego ing we also study the TRC with only even translations or with only odd translations. In the TRC algorithm we flip only active clusters but it is also possible to flip inactive clusters if a weight factor associated with the change in Gis used. We call a flip of an active cluster to an active cluster (+ −to−+ or−+ to +−) anactive flip . The TRC algorithm with inactive flips is obtained by replacing Step 1 with the following: 1′. Occupy satisfied bonds with probability p= 1−e−4K. Identify clusters connected by occupied bonds (including single sites). For each cluste rk, taken one at a time, randomly propose two new spin values values, sk=±1 and tk=±1 for the σandτ 5spins respectively. Compute δG, the change in Gthat would occur if the spins in the kthcluster are changed to the proposed values leaving spins in o ther clusters fixed. If δG≤0 accept the proposed spin values (set σi←skandτi←tkfor all sites iin cluster k), otherwise, if δG > 0 accept the proposed spin values with probability e−δG. Step 1′is by itself ergodic however it may be useful to add Metropoli s sweeps and trans- lations. III. METHODS We measured three observables using the TRC algorithm: the a bsolute value of the magnetization of a single replica, m; the energy of a single replica, E; and the absolute value of the net staggered magnetization for both replicas, s, where the definition of sis s=|(/summationdisplay i∈odd−/summationdisplay i∈even)(σi+τi)|. (8) Note that the staggered magnetization is conserved by all co mponents of the TRC algo- rithm except Metropolis sweeps and inactive flips. For each o f these observables we com- puted expectation values of the integrated autocorrelatio n time, τintand the exponential autocorrelation time, τexp. From τint, we estimated the dynamic exponent z. The autocorrelation function for φ, Γφφ(t) is given by, Γφφ(t) = lim l→∞/summationtextl−t t′=1(φ(t′)−ˆφ)(φ(t′+t)−ˆφ) /summationtextl t′=1(φ(t′)−ˆφ)2. (9) The integrated autocorrelation time for observable φis defined by τ=1 2+ lim t∗→∞t∗/summationdisplay t=1Γφφ(t) (10) and the exponential autocorrelation time for an observable φis defined by19 τexp,φ= lim t→∞−|t| log Γ φφ(t). (11) In practice the limits in Eqs. (9), (10) and (11) must be evalu ated at finite values. The length of the Monte Carlo runs determine land are discussed below. Following Ref. 19, we define τint,φ=1 2+t∗/summationdisplay t=1Γφφ(t) (12) 6and choose the cutoff t∗to be the smallest integer such that t∗≥κτint,φ, where κ= 6. We used the least-squares method to fit log Γ φφ(t/τint,φ) as a function of tto obtain the ratio of τint,φ/τexp,φand chose a cut-off at t/τint,φ= 5. We used the blocking method7,19to estimate errors. The whole sample of nMC mea- surements was divided into mblocks of equal length l=n/m. For each block iand each measured quantity A, we computed the mean ˆAi. Our estimates of ˆAand its error δAare obtained from: ˆA=1 mm/summationdisplay i=1ˆAi (13) δˆA2=1 m(m−1)m/summationdisplay i=1(ˆA−ˆAi)2(14) In our simulations, we divided the whole sample into mblocks where mis between 10 and 30. For the data collected using the TRC algorithm, each block ha s a length l≥103τint. For the data collected using modifications of the TRC algorit hm, each block has a length l≥102τint. Data were collected for H= 0, 2 and 4 and for size Lin the range 16 to 256. IV. RESULTS A. Integrated Autocorrelation Time Table I gives the integrated autocorrelation time using the TRC algorithm for the mag- netization, energy and staggered magnetization. Table I is comparable to the Table in Ref. 10 but the present numbers are systematically larger, espec ially at the larger system sizes. This discrepancy may be due to the sliding cut-off t∗used here instead of a fixed cut-off at 200 employed in Ref. 10. Table II gives the integrated autocorrelation times for mag netization using the TRC with only even or only odd translations. The comparison of TR C algorithm with only even translations and with only odd translations in Tables II sho ws that odd translations together with global flips of one replica relative to another are essen tial to achieve small and slowly growing autocorrelation times when the staggered field is pr esent. Table III shows the magnetization autocorrelation times us ing different algorithms for system size L= 80. The Swendsen-Wang (SW) algorithm has the smallest τint,min the 7absence of fields. However, when fields are present and the SW a lgorithm is then modified according to the method of Ref. 8 the performance is worse eve n than that of the Metropolis algorithm. The slow equilibration of the SW algorithm in the presence of the staggered field is due to small acceptance probabilities for flipping large c lusters. On the other hand, the presence of staggered fields does not significantly change th e performance the two-replica algorithm so long as odd translations are present. Inactive flips are helpful when there is no staggered field but when the staggered field is turned on, th e autocorrelation time is not substantially improved by inactive flips. The explanation f or the ineffectiveness of inactive flips when the staggered field is present is that the probabili ty of accepting an inactive flip is small. For example, this probability is 1 .4% for L= 80 and H= 4. The CPU time per spin on a Pentium III 450 MHz machine was also m easured for the various algorithms and is listed in Table III for L= 80 . By considering a range of system sizes we found that the CPU time for one MC sweep of the TRC algo rithm increases nearly linearly with the number of spins. The TRC algorithm is a fact or of 3 slower than the Metropolis algorithm but this difference is more than compen sated for by system size 80 by the much faster equilibration of the TRC algorithm. Even w ithout odd translations, the TRC algorithm outperforms Metropolis for size 80. B. Exponential Autocorrelation Time The ratio of the integrated to exponential autocorrelation times was found to be nearly independent of system size over the range L= 16 to L= 256. We found that over this size range τint,m/τexp,mvaried from 0 .448±0.008 to 0 .425±0.008 for H= 0; from 0 .44±0.01 to 0.43±0.01 for H= 2; and from 0 .448±0.009 to 0 .409±0.009 for H= 4. The ratio τint,s/τexp,sis also nearly independent of LandHand is about 0.45. The ratio τint,E/τexp,Eis nearly independent of Lbut decreases slowly with Hranging from 0.29 to 0.25 as Hranges from 0 to 4. The almost constant τint,φ/τexp,φfor different sizes suggests that the integrated and exponential autocorrelation times are governed by the s ame dynamic critical exponent. 8C. Dynamic Exponent Figures 2 and 3 show the magnetization integrated autocorre lation time for the TRC plotted on log-log and log-linear scales, respectively. Fi gures 4 and 5 show the energy inte- grated autocorrelation time for the TRC plotted on log-log a nd log-linear scales, respectively. Figures 6 and 7 show the staggered magnetization integrated autocorrelation time for the TRC plotted on log-log and log-linear scales, respectively . For the whole range of L, logarithmic growth appears to give a somewhat better fit tha n a simple power law, particularly for the magnetization. The refore, our results are consistent withz= 0 for the TRC algorithm. Under the assumption that the dynam ic exponent is not zero, we also carried out weighted least-squares fits to the f ormALzand varied Lmin, the minimum system size included in the fit. Figures 8, 9 and 10 sho w the dynamic exponent zfor the magnetization, energy and staggered magnetization , respectively, as a function ofLminusing the TRC algorithm. Figures 11 and 12, show the dynamic e xponent as a function of Lminfor the magnetization for the TRC with only even translation s and only odd translations, respectively. In all cases except zint,m,even , the dynamic exponent is a decreasing function of Lmin. For the magnetization, zint,mappears to extrapolate to a value between 0.1 and 0.2 as Lmin→∞ while for the energy and staggered magnetization, the dynamic exponent appears to extrapolate to a value between 0 .3 and 0.4. The small value of the dynamic exponent requires that odd translations and flip s are included in the algorithm. From Fig. 11 it is clear that the dynamic exponent is near 2 for the TRC algorithm with only even translations. Table IV gives results of the weighted least squares fits for zfor the smallest values of Lmin for which there is a reasonable confidence level. Since there is a general downward curvature in the log-log graphs, these numbers are likely to be overest imates of the asymptotic values. Thus, we can conclude that the asymptotic dynamic exponent f or the TRC algorithm is likely to be less than 0 .4 and is perhaps exactly zero. The dynamic exponent is appare ntly independent of the strength of the staggered field. For the ca se of the SW algorithm applied to the two-dimensional Ising with no staggered field the best estimate is z= 0.25±0.0120,21 but the results are also consistent with logarithmic growth of relaxation times. The numbers for dynamic exponent for the SW appear to be smaller than for t he TRC algorithm but this difference may simply reflect larger corrections to scaling i n the case of the TRC . 9V. DISCUSSION We studied the dynamics of the two-replica cluster algorith m applied to the two- dimensional Ising model in a staggered field. We found that th e dynamic exponent of the algorithm is either very small ( z≤0.4) or zero ( τ∼logL) and that the dynamic exponent does not depend on the strength of the staggered fiel d. A precise value of zcould not be determined because of large corrections to scaling. W e tested the importance of various optional components of the algorithm and found that an odd translation and global flip of one replica relative to another is essential for achie ving rapid equilibration. Without this component, zis near 2 so there is no qualitative improvement over the Metr opolis al- gorithm. An odd translation and global flip of one replica rel ative to the other allows for a large change of the total magnetization of the system with an acceptance fraction of 100%. Large changes in the global magnetization may also occur in t he Swendsen-Wang algorithm in a field or via inactive flips in the TRC algorithm but these fli ps have a small acceptance fraction due to the staggered field. Unfortunately, the odd t ranslation and flip move is allowed because of a special symmetry of the Ising model in a s taggered field. For more general Ising systems with translationally invariant field s, we expect performance similar to the TRC with even translations only. In this case, the autoco rrelation time is significantly less than for the Metropolis algorithm but the dynamic expon ent is about the same. While the two-replica approach is useful for these more general pr oblems of Ising systems with fields, it does not constitute a method that overcomes critic al slowing down except when additional symmetries are present that allow one replica to be flipped relative to the other. Development of general methods for efficiently simulating cr itical spin systems with fields remains an open problem. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by NSF grants DMR 9978233. ∗machta@physics.umass.edu 1R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86 (1987). 102U. Wolff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 361 (1989). 3D. Kandel and E. Domany, Phys. Rev. B 43, 8539 (1991). 4L. Chayes and J. Machta, Physica A 239, 542 (1997). 5L. Chayes and J. Machta, Physica A 254, 477 (1998). 6J.-S. Wang and R. H. Swendsen, Physica A 167, 565 (1990). 7M. E. J. Newman and G. T. Barkema, Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Oxford, Oxford, 1999). 8V. S. Dotsenko, W. Selke, and A. L. Talapov, Physica A 170, 278 (1991). 9I. Dukovski, J. Machta, C. Saravanan, and S. M. Auerbach, Cluster Monte Carlo Simulations of Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena in Zeolites (2000). 10O. Redner, J. Machta, and L. F. Chayes, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2749 (1998). 11L. Chayes, J. Machta, and O. Redner, J. Stat. Phys. 93, 17 (1998). 12R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2607 (1986). 13J. Machta, M. E. J. Newman, and L. B. Chayes, Replica exchange algorithm and results for the three-dimensional random field Ising model (2000), submitted to Phys. Rev. E and (cond- mat/0006267). 14C. Dress and W. Krauth, J. Stat. Phys. 28, L597 (1995). 15J. R. Heringa and H. W. J. Blote, Physica A 232, 369 (1996). 16J. R. Heringa and H. W. J. Blote, Phys. Rev. E 57, 4976 (1998). 17H. W. J. Blote and X.-R. Wu, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 23, L627 (1990). 18R. G. Edwards and A. Sokal, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2009 (1988). 19J. Salas and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat. Phys. 87, 1 (1997). 20C. F. Baillie and P. D. Coddington, Phys. Rev. B 43, 10617 (1992). 21P. D. Coddington and C. F. Baillie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 962 (1992). 110.511.522.53 T12345 HT FIG. 1: Phase diagram of the two-dimensional staggered field Ising model, the three points on the critical line corresponds respectively to H=0, 2, 4. 1.21.41.61.822.22.42.6 log10L11.21.41.61.8log10τint,m H=4H=2H=0 FIG. 2: Logarithm of the magnetization autocorrelation tim eτint,mvs. logarithm of system size forH= 0, 2, 4. 121.21.41.61.822.22.42.6 log10L1020304050τint,m H=4H=2H=0 FIG. 3: Magnetization autocorrelation time τint,mvs. logarithm of system size LforH= 0, 2, 4. 1.21.41.61.822.22.42.6 log10L0.60.811.21.41.6log10τint,ε H=4H=2H=0 FIG. 4: Logarithm of energy autocorrelation time τint,Evs. logarithm of system size LforH= 0, 2, 4. 131.21.41.61.822.22.42.6 log10L51015202530τint,ε H=4H=2H=0 FIG. 5: Energy autocorrelation time τint,Evs. logarithm of system size LforH= 0, 2, 4. 1.21.41.61.822.22.42.6 log10L11.21.41.61.82log10τint,s H=4H=2 FIG. 6: Logarithm of staggered magnetization autocorrelat ion time τint,svs. logarithm of system sizeLforH= 0, 2, 4. 141.21.41.61.822.22.42.6 log10L10203040506070τint,s H=4H=2 FIG. 7: Staggered magnetization autocorrelation time τint,svs. logarithm of system size Lfor H= 0, 2, 4. 0.010.020.030.040.050.060.07 1/□Lmin0.10.20.30.40.50.6zint,m H=4H=2H=0 FIG. 8: Finite size dynamic critical exponent for magnetiza tionzint,mvs. the reciprocal of the minimum size Lminused in the fit. 150.010.020.030.040.050.060.07 1/Lmin0.10.20.30.40.50.6zint,ε H=4H=2H=0 FIG. 9: Finite size dynamic critical exponent for energy zint,Evs. the reciprocal of the minimum sizeLminused in the fit. translations. 0.010.020.030.040.050.060.07 1/Lmin0.30.40.50.6zint,s H=4H=2 FIG. 10: Finite size dynamic critical exponent for staggere d magnetization zint,svs. the reciprocal of the minimum size Lminused in the fit. translations. 160.010.020.030.040.050.060.07 1/Lmin1.251.51.7522.252.52.753zint,m,evenH=4H=2H=0 FIG. 11: Finite size dynamic critical exponent for magnetiz ation zint,m,even vs. the reciprocal of the minimum size Lminused in the fit for the TRC with only even translations. 0.010.020.030.040.050.060.07 1/Lmin0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8zint,m,odd H=4H=2H=0 FIG. 12: Finite size dynamic critical exponent for magnetiz ation zint,m,odd vs. the reciprocal of the minimum size Lminused in the fit for the TRC with only odd translations. 17TABLE I: Integrated autocorrelation times for the TRC algor ithm for the magnetization of a single replica τm, the net staggered magnetization of both replicas τsand the energy of a single replica τe. H= 0 H= 2 H= 4 L(size) τint,m τint,E τint,m τint,s τint,E τint,m τint,s τint,E 1610.7±0.15.73±0.0913.5±0.210.8±0.25.49±0.0816.8±0.215.2±0.35.7±0.1 2417.0±0.28.0±0.120.2±0.316.5±0.58.0±0.223.0±0.322.4±0.47.8±0.2 3221.6±0.39.8±0.125.7±0.321.8±0.39.4±0.228.1±0.428.4±0.610.3±0.2 4026.3±0.411.8±0.329.2±0.525.1±0.311.4±0.231.4±0.431.7±0.811.3±0.3 4828.6±0.412.9±0.331.8±0.528.4±0.813.1±0.534.4±0.635.6±0.912.3±0.3 5630.6±0.614.7±0.534.7±0.528.7±0.613.6±0.237.5±0.639±114.3±0.4 6434.2±0.615.4±0.436.2±0.632±115.6±0.338.1±0.539.1±0.815.3±0.6 8037.3±0.616.2±0.439.8±0.737±116.7±0.540.4±0.845±116.7±0.8 9639.5±0.619.0±0.442.6±0.940.2±0.918.0±0.443±150±217.9±0.3 112 41.7±0.820.5±0.741.9±0.743±119.0±0.743.7±0.750±119.2±0.7 128 42.6±0.820.4±0.943.7±0.847±120.6±0.645.8±0.954.4±0.919.4±0.6 144 44.6±0.821.5±0.746.8±0.947±120.8±0.448±154±122.1±0.8 160 44.8±0.722.8±0.744.7±0.855±223.1±0.948.5±0.960±122.3±0.6 192 46.2±0.824.0±0.747.2±0.956±2 23±1 50±160±125±1 256 50±126.6±0.950.4±0.958±227.1±0.852.2±0.969±21 26±1.0 18TABLE II: Integrated autocorrelation times for the magneti zation of a single replica using the TRC algorithm with odd translations only, τint,m,odd and even translations only, τint,m,even . H=0 H=2 H=4 L(size) τint,m,odd τint,m,even τint,m,odd τint,m,even τint,m,odd τint,m,even 1611.6±0.212.6±0.114.8±0.417.8±0.319.0±0.324.6±0.5 2419.0±0.425.7±0.324.1±0.534.9±0.828.4±0.546±1 3225.9±0.339.3±0.830.3±0.456±235±177±5 40 32±158±234.5±0.883±444±1109±4 4836.6±1.077±439±1100±744±2144±6 5639.1±0.8106±945±1128±649±1188±17 64 44±1126±848±1166±1151±2203±12 80 46±1186±1854±2283±2755±1434±43 96 55±2− 57±1− 59±2− 112 54±2− 60±3− 63±3− 128 58±2− 62±3− 66±3− 144 63±2− 65±2− 68±3− 160 64±1− 68±3− 70±3− 196 68±3− 67±2− 75±4− 256 69±2− 68±3− 77±4− 19TABLE III: Magnetization integrated autocorrelation time s and CPU times for several algorithms forL= 80. Integrated Autocorrelation Time CPU time Algorithm H= 0 H= 2 H= 4 (10−6sec/sweep/spin) TRC 37.3±0.639.8±0.740.4±0.8 3.1 TRC odd translations only46±1 54±2 55±1 3.0 TRC even translations only186±18283±27435±43 2.9 TRC & inactive flips even translations only33.6±0.9246±27372±23 4.6 TRC no translations335±18440±24773±47 2.6 Swendsen-Wang 4.12±0.024682±1735707±48 1.3 Metropolis 928±991892±1582959±236 1.1 20TABLE IV: Estimated dynamic exponents together with minimu m size used in the fit and confi- dence level for the TRC algorithm, TRC algorithm with odd tra nslation only and TRC algorithm with even translation only. dynamic exponent zH= 0 H= 2 H= 4 zint,m 0.20±0.030.20±0.020.23±0.01 (Lmin,level ) (112,86%) (80,12%) (56,75%) zint,E 0.34±0.040.40±0.020.42±0.02 (Lmin,level ) (80,95%) (64,82%) (56,60%) zint,s 0.42±0.030.34±0.02 (Lmin,level )— (80,3%) (80,14%) zint,m,odd 0.17±0.070.23±0.040.33±0.02 (Lmin,level ) (144,89%) (80,60%) (40,95%) zint,m,even 1.67±0.061.97±0.22 (Lmin,level ) (32,96%) (48,71%)— 21

arXiv:physics/0007092v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 28 Jul 2000Threshold amplitudes for transition to turbulence in a pipe Lloyd N. Trefethena) Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Bldg., Pa rks Road, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK S. J. Chapmanb) OCIAM, Mathematical Institute, 24–29 St. Giles’, Oxford OX 1 3LB, UK Dan S. Henningsonc) Dept. of Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden ´Alvaro Meseguerd) Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Bldg., Pa rks Road, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK Tom Mulline) Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, M anchester M13 9PL, UK F. T. M. Nieuwstadtf) J. M. Burgers Centre, Delft U. of Technology, Rotterdamsewe g 145, 2628 AL Delft, Netherlands (December 2, 2013) Abstract Although flow in a circular pipe is stable to infinitesimal per turbations, it can be excited to turbulence by finite perturbations whose mi nimal ampli- tude shrinks as R→ ∞ (R= Reynolds number). Laboratory experiments have appeared to disagree with one another and with theoreti cal predictions about the dependence of this minimal amplitude on R, with published results ranging approximately from R−1/4toR−3/2. Here it is shown that these dis- crepancies can be explained by the use of different definition s of amplitude by different authors. An attempt is made to convert the existi ng results to a uniform definition of amplitude, the nondimensionalized L2definition com- mon in the theoretical literature. Although subtleties in t he physics raise some questions, agreement appears to be reached on a minimal amplitude that scales as R−3/2±0.3. Typeset using REVT EX 1I. INTRODUCTION Laminar incompressible flow in an infinite circular pipe is ma thematically stable, but in practice, pipe flows invariably undergo transition to turbu lence if the Reynolds number Ris high. It is generally accepted that an explanation for this p henomenon is that although the laminar state is stable to infinitesimal perturbations of th e velocity field, certain small finite amplitude perturbations are enough to excite transition fo r large R. A natural question is, ifǫ=ǫ(R) denotes the minimal amplitude of all perturbations that ma y excite transition, and if ǫscales with Raccording to ǫ=O(Rγ) (1.1) asR→ ∞, then what is the exponent γ? A value of γsubstantially below zero would correspond to a sensitivity of the laminar flow that increase s rapidly with R. We six, coming from diverse backgrounds in applied mathemat ics, scientific computing, and laboratory experimentation, have all been interested i n (1.1), but the exponents γthat our different lines of research have suggested have varied by as much as a factor of six, from ≈−1/4 to−3/2. In discussions at the ERCOFTAC Workshop on Subcritical Tr ansition in Delft in October, 1999, it became clear that we have been usin g inconsistent definitions of the amplitude of a velocity perturbation. Without a consist ent definition, (1.1) of course has little meaning. The purpose of this note is to attempt to c ast our various results in terms of a single definition of amplitude. The definition we sh all use is essentially the one employed previously by Chapman [1], Schmid and Henningson [ 2], Trefethen, et al. [3], and others, and we shall call it the L2amplitude . We do not argue that this definition is more or less appropriate physically than any other, merely that i t is precise and that it provides a reasonable starting point for discussion. Specifically, in this note we attempt to convert the experime ntal results of Draad and Nieuwstadt [4,5] (henceforth DN) and Darbyshire and Mullin [6] (henceforth DM) to L2 amplitudes. We conclude that in the L2framework, DN’s published exponent of −1 should be adjusted to between about −2 and−1, and DM’s published exponent of between −0.4 and −0.2 should be adjusted to between −1.8 and−1.15. One reason why these adjusted values are expressed as ranges rather than single numbers is that bo th sets of experiments introduce perturbations by injection from the side of the pipe, and it i s not known exactly what perturbations these injections induce in the velocity field within the pipe. We emphasize that these ranges are rough, having nothing like the two-dig it precision suggested by a number like −1.15. Based on an asymptotic analysis of the Navier–Stokes equati ons, Chapman [1] has pre- dicted the values γ=−5/4 for plane Couette flow and γ=−3/2 for plane Poiseuille flow, and discussed the relationship of these predictions to exis ting evidence from direct numer- ical simulation of the Navier–Stokes equations (DNS) [7,8] . (In the plane Poiseuille case one restricts attention to perturbations that avoid the Tol lmien–Schlichting instability.) In work not yet written for publication, Chapman has extended t he prediction γ=−3/2 also to pipe flow. Thus if our adjusted exponents for the DN and DM ex periments are correct, there would appear to be reasonable agreement between two in dependent laboratories and a theoretical calculation on an exponent for the pipe in the v icinity γ≈ −3 2. (1.2) 2This result would be consistent with the conjecture of Ref. [ 3] that γis strictly less than −1, an inequality also satisfied by most of the low-dimensional O DE models of the Navier–Stokes equations that have been published in the 1990s [9]. The appa rent convergence of various lines of evidence on the estimate (1.2) looks promising, but we urge that it not be taken as definitive or as numerically precise. There are uncertain ties at many points on both the experimental and theoretical sides, and no relevant data at all yet from DNS simulations for the pipe. Moreover, as we mention in Section 3, Chapman’s asy mptotic arguments are based on pipe lengths much longer than those in the DN and DM experim ents, and for these pipes of finite lengths, somewhat less sensitivity to perturbatio ns may be expected. We regard (1.2) as a rough working approximation. II. NONDIMENSIONALIZATION AND L2AMPLITUDE One source of confusion about γhas been the nondimensionalization of the Navier– Stokes equations. The L2definition of amplitude is formulated within a particular ch oice of nondimensional variables, the standard one. We shall revie w this choice and explain why it can be a point of confusion. We are concerned with the idealized problem of laminar flow th rough an infinite circular pipe. The standard nondimensionalization takes the pipe ra dius as the space scale and the centerline velocity as the velocity scale. Thus, after nond imensionalization, the radius and velocity become radius = 1 ,velocity = 1 . These choices imply that the nondimensional time scale is th e convective one, i.e., the time it takes the flow to travel downstream a distance of one pipe ra dius: time to travel one pipe radius = 1 . Now there is also another time scale physically present in th e problem, on which the effects of viscosity are felt. In our nondimensionalization this vi scous time scale is R, the Reynolds number. Thus we have the following situation: a typical flow p erturbation of small amplitude and of spatial extent comparable to the pipe radius is convec ted down the pipe at speed O(1) for a time O(R) and a distance O(R) before the effects of viscosity become significant. With these scales agreed upon, we imagine an initial value pr oblem in which at time t= 0, the velocity field consists of the laminar solution plus a div ergence-free finite perturbation u(0) = u(x, r, θ, 0). The flow now evolves according to the Navier–Stokes equat ions, with the result that the initial perturbation develops as a time- dependent divergence-free function u(t) =u(x, r, θ, t ). At any time t, we measure the amplitude of uin an L2fashion: /bardblu(t)/bardbl=/parenleftbigg/integraldisplay∞ −∞/integraldisplay1 0/integraldisplay2π 0u(x, r, θ, t )2dθrdrdx/parenrightbigg1/2 . (2.1) Thus/bardblu(t)/bardblis the root-mean-square velocity perturbation over the who le pipe. We now return to the matter of why these formulations may some times be confusing. In most laboratory experiments, and certainly in DM and DN, t he Reynolds number R 3is controlled by varying the speed of the flow, not the viscosi ty. On the other hand in nondimensional units the speed of the flow is always 1, and oth er velocities are defined as ratios to this one. Thus to convert from laboratory to nondim ensional units we must multiply time measured in seconds by R (2.2) and divide velocity measured in meters/second by R (2.3) (as well as R-independent scalings by pipe diameter divided by kinemati c viscosity). In particular, the nondimensionalized O(Rγ) and O(R−3/2) formulas of (1.1) and (1.2) would appear as O(Rγ+1) and O(R−1/2) in laboratory units. Thus (1.2) can be paraphrased by the statement that if you double the speed of flow of water through an infinitely long pipe, the minimal velocity perturbation needed to excite transition becomes smaller in meters/second by a factor of about√ 2 and smaller relative to the flow speed by a factor of about 2√ 2. III. ASYMPTOTIC ESTIMATES OF CHAPMAN Chapman’s paper [1] estimates γfor channel flows by asymptotic analysis of the Navier– Stokes equations. The exponent γ=−3/2 is obtained for plane Poiseuille flow, and though this has not yet been written for publication, the same expon ent results from an analogous analysis of pipe flow. Chapman uses the L2definition of amplitude as described above, except that he assumes a periodic flow perturbation and define s amplitude by an integral over one period. We believe that this does not affect the final r esult, so that his conclusion can be fairly summarized by (1.2). We shall say nothing of the arguments of Ref. [1] except to not e that they are based on the specific initial condition that appears to be most effec tive at exciting transition, a streamwise vortex plus small non-streamwise components. If the analysis is correct, the threshold amplitude for such perturbations to excite trans ition will scale as R−3/2asR→ ∞. In principle −3/2 is thus a proposed upper bound for γin the sense that there is the possibility that some other initial configuration might be f ound that would excite transition more effectively. It must be noted, however, that Chapman’s analysis is based o n flow structures that evolve on a time scale O(R), during which they move a distance O(R) and stretch a distance O(R). For the mechanisms involved to come fully into play, a pipe would have to have length at least O(R), i.e., O(R) pipe diameters. This exceeds the actual pipe lengths of exp eriments, which are in the hundreds, not thousands or tens of thousands . Thus an exponent as low as the theoretical value of −3/2 should not necessarily be observable in any existing pipe experiment. (Conversely, Chapman also identifies other fini te-Reffects that act in the opposite direction, effects which make exponents γestimated from data with R <104more negative than the asymptotic values for R→ ∞.) IV. PIPE EXPERIMENTS OF DRAAD AND NIEUWSTADT The DN experiments in the 36m pipe at the Delft University of T echnology are described in detail in Ref. [4]. In these experiments, a disturbance is introduced into the laminar flow 4through a set of slits in the side of the pipe. These are pumped in an oscillatory fashion so that water is injected and extracted sinusoidally at a contr ollable frequency and amplitude. As a measure of disturbance amplitude, DN take injection vel ocity nondimensionalized ac- cording to (2.3), i.e., divided by the flow velocity in the pip e. Their experiments lead to the following estimates, summarized for example in Figure 6.8 o n p. 140 of Ref. [4]: DN as published: γ≈/braceleftbigg−2/3 for long wavelengths, −1 for short wavelengths.(4.1) “Long” and “short” wavelengths are defined in the usual nondi mensional space scale, i.e., relative to the pipe radius. For simplicity, since our inter est is in smallest perturbations that may excite turbulence, from now on we shall consider just the value−1 reported by DN for short wavelengths. Several matters arise in the attempt to convert the DN result to the amplitude measure (2.1). The most obvious is the fact that since the DN perturba tions are periodic in time, they have infinite L2-amplitude. For the conversion to (2.1) we must guess how sho rt a finite-length perturbation might have led to approximatel y the same observations. If a perturbation of length O(1) (i.e., of length independent of R) would suffice, then the exponent γ≈ −1 can be taken at face value. On the other hand one might also im agine that perturbations of length and time scale O(R) (i.e., laboratory time O(1) as measured in seconds) would be needed. In this case the disturbance amp litudes must be multiplied byO(R1/2) for conversion to L2amplitude because of the square root in (2.1), so that the estimate γ≈ −1 should be increased by 1 /2 to−1/2. Thus at this stage of the discussion it would appear that the D N minimal exponent −1 corresponds in the amplitude measure (2.1) to a figure in the r ange−1 to−1/2. It appears to us that there is also a second adjustment that sh ould be applied to cast these results in terms of the L2amplitude (2.1). DN measure disturbance amplitude by velocity in the injection and extraction slits. However, th e velocity of the water in the slits is not proportional to the velocity of the perturbation it in duces in the pipe. The reason is that as the flow speed in the pipe increases with R, a proportionally greater volume of water is disturbed by the injection and extraction, implying that the pointwise velocity disturbance shrinks. Penetration scenario. Suppose that for any flow speed R, the injected perturbation penetrates approximately the full width of the pipe. Then be cause the amount of fluid into which it is injected scales as O(R), the velocity amplitude reduces pointwise by O(R). The exponents −1 to−1/2 would need to be decreased by 1, giving the range from −2 to−3/2. Non-penetration scenario. On the other hand, it is not obvious that injected pertur- bations penetrate the pipe effectively, and the other extrem e scenario would seem to be that the injected perturbation affects a region near the pipe wall of width O(R−1). In this case, the perturbation is distributed over a volume O(R−1)×O(R) =O(1), i.e., a volume independent of R. The pointwise velocity amplitude will accordingly be inde pendent of R in that region. At the same time, the fraction of the pipe fille d by the velocity perturbation is now not O(1) but O(R−1), implying an L2correction factor of O(R−1/2). Thus according to the L2definition of amplitude, the exponents −1 to−1/2 would need to be decreased by 1/2, giving the range from −3/2 to−1. Our discussion has raised two physical questions (whose ans wers may be related). Rather 5than attempt to resolve them on the basis of meagre evidence, we summarize our current understanding of the DN observations for short wavelengths by the range DN adjusted to L2amplitudes: −2≤γ≤1. In principle these are estimated upper bounds for γ, as it is always possible that the pertur- bations actually injected are not maximally efficient in exci ting turbulence. V. PIPE EXPERIMENTS OF DARBYSHIRE AND MULLIN The DM experiments, described in Ref. [6], were carried out i n a 3.8m pipe at Oxford University. (The equipment subsequently moved with Mullin to the University of Manch- ester, where a new 17m pipe has recently been built based on th e same design.) These experiments differ in many ways from those of DN, the most fund amental one being that water is sucked out of the pipe at fixed speed rather than pushe d into it at fixed pres- sure. Another important difference is that whereas the DN per turbation is periodic, the DM perturbation is injected just once. The DM paper does not propose a value for γexcept to suggest that it seems to be just slightly less than 0. Based on the plots in Ref. [6], a rough es timate would seem to be DM as published: −0.4≤γ≤ −0.2. (5.1) However, the disturbance amplitudes reported by DM are not n ormalized by the velocity in the pipe. Introducing the adjustment (2.3) gives DM after nondimensionalization: −1.4≤γ≤ −1.2. Now the more difficult question arises, as in the DN case, of wha t further adjustment may be needed because of the complex relationship between th e flow velocity in the slits and the perturbation velocities induced in the pipe. As with DN, the DM flow perturbations are measured in the slits, not in the pipe. The form of the inje ctions even in the slits is complicated by the geometry of a drive mechanism mounted o n a rotating plate. In adjusting what they call the amplitude A, DM increase the injected volume in proportion toA, the injection time approximately in proportion to A1/2, and the maximum injection velocity approximately in proportion to A1/2. Within the pipe, this will produce a velocity perturbation extending a distance on the order of A1/2R. Penetration scenario. Suppose the perturbation penetrates a distance O(1) into the pipe. Then the volume of the effective disturbance is O(A1/2R) and its pointwise amplitude isO(A1/2R−1), giving an L2amplitude O(A3/4R−1/2). Non-penetration scenario. Suppose the perturbation penetrates only a distance O(R−1) into the pipe. Then the volume of the effective disturbance is O(A1/2) and its pointwise amplitude is O(A1/2), giving an L2amplitude of O(A3/4). We conclude that two further adjustments of the DM results ar e needed to convert them toL2amplitudes. First, because what DM call Abecomes O(A3/4) in the L2measure, the numbers −0.4 and−0.2 should be multiplied by 3 /4, becoming −0.3 and−0.15. Second and more important, the final numbers obtained should be redu ced by between 0 and 1 /2. Putting all these adjustments together gives: 6DM adjusted to L2amplitudes: −1.8≤γ≤ −1.15. We emphasize once more that our arguments and measurements a re not as precise as these numbers may suggest. In principle these are again estimated upper bounds for γ, as it is again possible that the perturbations actually injected are not maximally effici ent. In particular, it might be possible to excite turbulence more efficiently by disturbanc es shaped to have a streamwise length with a different dependence on Rand on amplitude. VI. DISCUSSION The existing experimental and theoretical literature on th reshold exponents for transition in a pipe is based on inconsistent definitions of amplitudes, so the published results are not comparable. Here we have attempted to reformulate some of th ese results in a matter consis- tent enough for a meaningful comparison. There are numerous uncertainties in this process, including spatial vs. temporal growth of disturbances, sol itary vs. periodic disturbances, form of the velocity field perturbation effectively introduc ed by injection, non-“optimality” of experimentally injected disturbances from the point of v iew of exciting transition, the effects of finite pipe length, and, of course, experimental er ror. For all these reasons, no decisive conclusion can be drawn from our comparison. The te ntative conclusion we draw is that the reformulated experimental (Draad and Nieuwstad t; Darbyshire and Mullin) and theoretical (Chapman) results appear to agree upon a critic al exponent roughly in the range γ=−3/2±0.3, if the centerline velocity is nondimensionalized to 1. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research of AM, TM, and LNT was supported by the Engineeri ng and Physical Sciences Research Council of the UK under Grant GR/M30890. T he work of TM was also supported by the Leverhulme Trust. 7REFERENCES a)LNT@comlab.ox.ac.uk b)chapman@maths.ox.ac.uk c)hnd@ffa.se d)Alvaro.Meseguer@comlab.ox.ac.uk e)tom.mullin@man.ac.uk f)F.T.M.Nieuwstadt@wbmt.tudelft.nl 1S. J. Chapman, “Subcritical transition in channel flows,” ma nuscript, August 1999. 2P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson, Stability and Transition in Shear Flows, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 2000. 3L. N. Trefethen, A. E. Trefethen, S. C. Reddy and T. A. Driscol l, “Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues,” Science 261, 578 (1993). 4A. A. Draad, Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Pipe Flow for Newtonian an d Non- Newtonian Fluids, PhD dissertation, Delft U. of Tech., 1996. 5A. A. Draad, G. D. C. Kuiken and F. T. M. Nieuwstadt, “Laminar- turbulent transition in pipe flow for Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids,” manuscr ipt, 1997. 6A. G. Darbyshire and T. Mullin, “Transition to turbulence in constant-mass-flux pipe flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 289, 83 (1995). 7D. S. Henningson, “Bypass transition and linear growth mech anisms,” in R. Benzi, ed., Advances in Turbulence V, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995. 8A. Lundbladh, D. S. Henningson, and S. C. Reddy, “Threshold a mplitudes for transition in channel flows,” in Transition, Turbulence and Combustion , v. I, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994. 9J. S. Baggett and L. N. Trefethen, “Low-dimensional models o f subcritical transition to turbulence,” Phys. Fluids 9, 1043 (1997). 8

arXiv:physics/0007093v1 [physics.gen-ph] 28 Jul 2000A NOTE ON 3 + 1 DIMENSIONALITY B.G. Sidharth∗ Centre for Applicable Mathematics & Computer Sciences B.M. Birla Science Centre, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad - 500063 (India) Abstract Recent work by Castro, Granik and El Naschie has given a ra- tionale for the three dimensionality of our physical space w ithin the framework of cantorian fractal space time using similar ide as of quan- tized fractal space time and noncommutativity. We also dedu ce the same result. Interestingly this is also seen to provide a rat ionale for an unproven conjecture of Poincare. In a recent paper, Castro, Granik and El Naschie have given a r ationale for the three dimensionality of our physical space within th e framework of a Cantorian fractal space time and El Naschie’s earlier work thereon[1, 2]. An ensemble is used and the value for the average dimension in volving the golden mean is deduced close to the value of our 3 + 1 dimension s. We now make a few remarks based on an approach which is in the spirit o f the above considerations. Our starting point is the fact that the fractal dimension of a quantum path is two, which, it has been argued is described by the coordinate s (x, ict)[3]. In- fact this leads to discretized space time, and a non commutat ive geometry as in the approach of El Naschie, Castro and Granik, and further the Dirac equa- tion of the spin half electron is seen to emerge from these con siderations[4]. Given the spin half, it is then possible to deduce the dimensi onality of an ensemble of such particles, which turns out to be three[5, 6] . There is another way of looking at this. If we generalise from the one space 0E-mail:birlasc@hd1.vsnl.net.in;Fax:0091-40-237266;T el:0091-40-235081 1dimensional case and the complex ( x, t) plane to three dimensions, we infact obtain the four dimensional case and the Theory of Quarterni ons, which are based on the Pauli Spin Matrices[7]. As has been noted by Sach s, had Hamil- ton identified the fourth coordinate in the above generalisa tion with time, then he would have anticipated Special Relativity itself. I t must be observed that the Pauli Spin Matrices which denote the Quantum Mechan ical spin half form, again, a non commutative structure. Curiously enough the above consideration in the complex pla ne can have an interesting connection with an unproven nearly hundred y ear old conjec- ture of Poincare. This was, the fact that closed loops could b e shrunk to points as happens on the two dimensional surface of a sphere i s also valid in three dimensions. Such closed loops defining a simply connec ted space are described by closed contours in complex space which have an i ntegral value for the index[8]. For the surface of the sphere the axes are re placed by great circles and the coordinates by the longitude and latitude. I f we now gener- alise to three dimensions, we end up instead with the above fo ur dimensional Quarternion theory of Hamilton - the three dimensional case is not possible. We have instead three space dimensions, and a fourth dimensi on, which as seen above can also be recovered from the doubly connected or spinorial be- haviour. Interestingly this also provides a rationale for P oincare’s conjecture not being provable. References [1] C. Castro, A. Granin, M.S. El Naschie, hep-th/0004152. [2] M.S. El Naschie, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Vol.5, No.8 , pp.1503- 1508,1995. [3] B.G. Sidharth, ”Space Time as a Random Heap”, to appear in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. [4] B.G. Sidharth, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 11(2000) 126 9-1278. [5] C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, ”Gravitatio n” W.H. Free- man, San Francisco, p.1148ff (1973). 2[6] R. Penrose, ”Angular Momentum: An approach to combinati onal space- time” in, ”Quantum Theory and Beyond”, Ed., Bastin, T., Camb ridge University press, Cambridge, p.151 (1971). [7] M. Sachs, ”General Relativity and Matter” D. Reidel Publ ishing Com- pany, Holland, p.45ff (1982). [8] J. B. Conway, ”Functions of One Complex Variable”, Sprin ger Interna- tional, New York, p.80ff (1973). 3

THE JEFFERSON LAB 1 KW IR FEL D. Douglas, for the IR Demonstration FEL Project Team, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606, USA Abstract The Jefferson Lab (JLab) IR Demo Free Electron L a- ser (FEL) has completed commissioning and is initiating user service. The FEL — a high repetition rate, low e x- traction efficiency wiggler-driven optical cavity reson a- tor — produces over 1 kW of tuneable light on intervals in a 3–6 µm wavelength range. It is driven by a 35–48 MeV, 5 mA superconducting RF (SRF) based energy- recovering co ntinuous wave (CW) electron linac. The driver accelerator meets requirements imposed by low energy, high current, and a demand for stringent beam control at the wiggler and during energy recovery. These constraints are driven by the need for six- dimensional phase space management, the existence of deleterious collective phenomena (space charge, wak e- fields, beam break-up, and coherent synchrotron radi a- tion), and interactions between the FEL and the acce l- erator RF. We will detail the system design, relate co m- missioning highlights, and discuss present perfor mance. 1 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS The FEL is a wiggler-driven laser with an 8 m long optical cavity resonator [1]. It uses modest gain, low output coupling, and low micropulse energy with high repetition rate to avoid high single bunch charge while producing high average power. This paradigm leads to the use of SRF technology, allowing CW operation, and motivates use of energy recovery to alleviate RF system demands. The system architecture thus imposes two requir e- ments on the driver accelerator: • delivery to the wiggler of an electron beam with properties suitable for the FEL interaction, and • recovery of the drive beam energy after the FEL. The first requirement reflects the needs of the FEL sy s- tem itself. Optimized beam parameters are given in T a- ble 1. We note the nominal FEL extraction efficiency produced with these parameters is >½%. The micropulse energy is modest; high output power is achieved through the use of very high repetition rate (20th subharmonic of the RF fundamental) and CW o peration. The energy recovery requirement reduces RF system demands (both installed klystron power and RF window tolerances), cost, and radiation effects by decelerating the beam after the FEL so as to drive the RF cavities. As the full momentum spread after the wiggler will be ~5%,this creates a need for a large acceptance transport sy s- tem. 2 SYSTEM CONFIGURATION 2.1 Overview The above system requirements couple to many ph e- nomena and constraints. Phase space requirements at the FEL demand transverse matching and longitudinal phase space management during acceleration and transport to the wiggler. Similarly, the machine must provide ad e- quate transverse beam size control while managing the large longitudinal phase space. Such transport and co n- ditioning of the beam must be performed in the presence of a number of potential collective effects driven by the high current and low energy. To avoid space-charge- driven beam quality degradation, moderately high inje c- tion energy is needed [2]. Beam break-up (BBU) and other impedance-driven instabilities must be avoided [3]. Coherent synchrotron radiation (CSR) must be managed to preserve beam emittance [4]. RF stability must be assured, particularly in transient regimes such as FEL turn-on and initi ation of energy recovery [5]. Figure 1 illustrates the system concept, which has su c- cessfully addressed these issues. The schematic shows the 10 MeV injector, a single eight-cavity Jefferson Lab cryomodule accelerating to ~40 MeV, an FEL insertion, and energy recovery transport from wiggler through module to a beam dump. All acceleration is performed using standard CEBAF 1.497 GHz five-cell cavities. A Table 1: Optimized system parameters Beam energy at wiggler ~40 MeV Beam current 5 mA Single bunch charge 60 pC Bunch repetition rate 74.85 MHz Normalized emittance 13 mm-mrad RMS bunch length at wiggler ~½ psec Peak current 60 A FEL extraction efficiency >½% δp/p rms, before wi ggler full, after wiggler ¼ % 5% CW FEL power >1 kWsummary of the function and performance of each se c- tion will now be provided. 2.2 Injector The electron source is a DC photocathode gun nom i- nally producing 60 pC bunches at 320 keV with repet i- tion rates of up to 75 MHz [6]. Immediately following the gun a room-temperature buncher compresses the initial ele ctron pulse, which is then captured by a two- cavity CEBAF cryounit and accelerated to 10 MeV. A four-quad telescope matches beam envelopes to the linac acceptance across a three-bend “W” achromat. RF co m- ponent phases are adjusted to produce, in concert with the injection line momentum compaction, a long (~3 psec rms) low relative momentum spread (~0.1% rms) bunch at the entrance of the linac. Injected beam quality depends on gun operating vol t- age and charge per bunch; typical normalized emittances for 320 kV operation are of order 5–10 mm-mrad [7]. 2.3 Linac The linac accelerates the injected beam from 10 MeV to 35–48 MeV using a single high gradient eight-cavity Jefferson Lab cryomodule. By accelerating 8o off crest, a phase/energy correlation is imposed on the longitudinal phase space; this is used downstream for bunch co m- pression. The RF cavities also provide transverse focu s- sing, assisting in beam envelope management. Immediately after the cryomodule, a small dipole is used to separate the accelerated and energy recovered beams. The low energy beam is directed to a dump; the effect of this bend on the full energy beam is corrected by a subsequent pair of small bends. 2.4 FEL Insertion The FEL is located immediately beyond the linac. As this is prior to recirculation bending, it avoids potential CSR degradation of beam quality and allowed a low power “straight ahead” operational (non-energy reco v- ering) mode before the recirculator was fully installed; this remains a useful diagnostic configuration. A qua d- rupole telescope (two triplets) matches beam envelopesfrom module to wiggler. An achromatic four-dipole ch i- cane between the triplets separates optical cavity and electron beam components while compressing the bunch length. The chicane geometry is constrained by the to l- erable momentum compaction. Larger chicanes provide more space but lead to higher compactions with more time of flight jitter; to maintain FEL pulse/drive beam synchronism, the ch icane M56 is restricted to –0.3 m. The match from module to wiggler, by virtue of RF focussing, depends on linac energy gain. It is therefore adjusted operationally to compensate for gross (several MeV) energy changes. After the wiggler, the electron beam (full momentum spread > 5%) is matched to the recirculation transport using a second quad telescope. This avoids beam envelope mismatch, large spot sizes, aggravated optical aberrations, error sensitivities, and potential beam loss. As in the linac to wiggler transport, a dipole chicane embedded in the telescope moves the electron beam off the optical cavity axis; this chicane also lengthens the electron bunch, reducing peak cu r- rents and alleviating potential wakefield and CSR e f- fects. Simulations and experience with the machine ind i- cate that space charge effects are not significant above ~25 MeV [8]; analysis of system performance and o p- erational tuning is therefore possible using single- particle transport mo dels. 2.5 Recirculator/Energy Recovery Transp ort Following the FEL insertion, the electron beam (full momentum spread > 5%) is transported through a reci r- culation arc to the linac for energy recovery. This reci r- culator provides both transverse beam confinement and longitudinal phase space conditioning. Bending is pr o- vided by achromatic and nominally isochronous end loops based on an MIT-Bates design [9]. Dipole p a- rameters (bend and edge angles) and drift lengths are set to provide M 56=0 from wiggler to reinjection point, and, across each end loop, betatron stable motion in the hor i- zontal plane (with a tune of 5/4) and imaging transport vertically (-I transfer matrix). The end loops are joined by six 90o FODO cells; with the end loop phase advancesFigure 1: Jefferson Lab 1 kW IR FEL. The machine is shown in the facility vault. 10 MeV injector30 MeV cryomo dule FEL insertion Energy-recovered beamEnergy Recovery DumpIn- Line Dumpand reflective symmetry across the backleg, this su p- presses aberrations over the full arc. Beam path length through the recirculator is adjusted using steering dipoles adjacent to the large 180o dipoles and is used to set the phase of the energy-recovered beam with respect to the module RF fields. Each end loop has four trim quads and four sextupoles for dispe r- sion and compaction control. A single family each of quadrupoles and sextupoles (adjacent to the 180 o bends) is used to modify the linear and quadratic momentum compactions from wiggler to reinjection, so as to co m- pensate the slope and curvature of the RF waveform during energy recovery. This allows simultaneous reco v- ery of RF power from the electron beam and compre s- sion of the beam energy spread at the dump. The second end-loop delivers the longitudinally co n- ditioned beam to the linac axis, where it is betatron matched to the cyromodule acceptance using a four-quad telescope, and merged with the injected beam using a small achr omatic three-dipole chicane. 2.6 Longitudinal Matching Scenario Key to the operation of this device is the use of bunch length compression (to create high peak current for FEL gain) and energy recovery (to provide RF power required for acceleration of high average currents) [10]. Figure 2 presents a schematic of the longitudinal matching sc e- nario employed in the system. The individual phase- energy plots indicate the orientation of the longitudinal phase space at key locations around the m achine. The injector provides a long, upright, small mome n- tum spread bunch (3 psec rms × 30 keV rms), which is accelerated off-crest in the linac. This imposes a phase- energy correlation, generating ~¼% momentum spread — about 100 keV at 40 MeV — over one rms bunch length. The momentum compaction of the chicane u p- stream of the wiggler rotates this slewed phase space upright, generating a short bunch (0.4 psec rms) at the wiggler. The FEL interaction does not affect bunch length, but does generate a large full momentum spread. This isevident in Figure 3, which shows the beam at a dispersed point (η=0.4 m) in the chicane immediately downstream of the wiggler, without lasing (left image: full mome n- tum spread ~1%, or 400 keV) and with lasing (right i m- age: full momentum spread ~5%, or 2 MeV). This is, as well, indicative of the rather large acceptance required of the recirculator. The recirculator momentum compa c- tion is then used to rotate the bunch so that an appropr i- ate phase energy correlation occurs at reinje ction. The recirculator path length is adjusted by using the aforementioned dipoles to reinject the recirculated beam 180o out of phase with the accelerated beam. This results in a transfer of beam power to the RF structure, with a resulting recovery of the beam energy. The phase-energy correlation imposed by the recirculator trim quads is selected to compensate the slope of the decelerating RF waveform. As a consequence, the 2 MeV energy full spread of the recirculated beam, rather than adiabatically antidamping to a relative energy spread of order 20% during energy recovery to 10 MeV, energy compresses to ~100 keV at the dump, giving a final relative energy spread of 1%. This 20:1 energy compression requires not only the appropriate recirculator M 56, but also demands the proper T 566 so as to correct both the lattice quadratic variation of path length with momentum and the curv a- ture of the decelerating RF waveform. Figure 4 illu s- trates this point by displaying the 10 MeV energy reco v- ered beam at a dispersed point ( η~1 m) near the dump with and without lasing and without and with sextupoles. The beam is more diffuse and the momentum spread Figure 3: Beam viewer image in downstream chicane (dispersion of 0.4 m) ; left: no lasing, right: lasing. E φE φE φE φ E φ E φE φ Figure 2: Longitudinal matching scenario in IR Demo showing phase/energy plots at critical locations.1 cmgreater without sextupoles (top) than when sextupoles are activated (bottom). The final beam spot is however roughly independent of lasing when sextupoles are act i- vated (bottom left, laser off; bottom right, laser on). Energy recovery is quite efficient. This is illustrated by Figure 5, which presents the RF drive system forward powers in each cryomodule cavity with beam off, with 1 mA of beam without energy recovery, and at various currents with energy recovery. Essentially all of the beam power is recovered, inasmuch as no power beyond the zero current value is r equired. 3 CONSTRUCTION AND COMMISSIONING HIGHLIGHTS IR Demo project funding started in April 1996, with construction and installation continuing through August 1998. Commissioning activities interleaved with co n-struction began in the fall of 1997, with milestones met as indicated in the following chronology: • Oct. 1997 1st beam in vault (injector) • Dec. 1997 1st beam to straight-ahead dump • Mar. 1998 high current single pass operation (1.1 mA CW to straight-ahead dump) • Jun. 1998 wiggler installed, 1st light (155 W CW at 5 µm /1.1 mA straight ahead) • Jul. 1998 recirculator construction completed, 1st energy recovered beam, 1st (low power) lasing with energy recovery • Dec. 1998 high power lasing with energy r e- covery (>200 W CW at 5 µm/1.4 mA) • Mar. 1999 kW-class 5 µm operation (710 W CW at 3.6 mA; mirror limited) • Jul. 1999 1.72 kW CW at 3 µm/4.4 mA; kW- class tuneable light at 3, 5 and 6 µm 5th harmonic (1 µm) lasing • Sept. 1999 Thomson scattering x-ray production Early in commissioning, the system was limited to ~30% availability by the gun. Effort in this area has led to a very reliable electron source with nearly 100% availability. The presently installed GaAs wafer has pr o- vided cathode lifetimes in excess of 600 C and has d e- livered over 2 kC total charge [11]. Also noteworthy during commissioning were the production of 1 µm light through fifth harmonic lasing [12] and the generation of intense, short x-ray pulses through Thomson scattering [13]. The latter holds promise of expanding the scope of the user facility to support pump-probe experimentation. 4 PERFORMANCE The driver accelerator and FEL perform flexibly, robustly, and reproducibly. The system restores to full power lasing in a shift after long shutdowns; during normal operations, lasing is recovered in minutes after a vault acess. Operations are simplified by a full suite of diagnostics [14], including beam position monitors, opt i- cal transition radiation based beam viewers, beam cu r- rent montoring cavities and a “ Happek device”, an inter- ferometric coherent transition radiation based bunch length diagnostic. The former pair of diagnostics allows beam steering and transverse matching, the latter pair supports the longitudinal matc hing detailed above. The FEL provides pulsed and CW lasing with variable timing (within limits dictated by the drive laser fund a- mental of 75 MHz and the optical cavity length of 8 m) over continuously tuneable ranges around 3, 5, and 6 µm (defined by mirror reflectivities). It is used as a source by a growing user community [15] and for machine studies. The latter include the topics of FEL/RF stability, BBU, CSR, and investigations of tapered wiggler d y- namics [16]. A typical FEL output spectrum is shown in Figure 7, a detuning curve is shown in Figure 8. Figure 4: Electron beam spot at dump: top row, sextupoles off; bottom row, sextupoles on; left co l- umn, lasing off ; right column, lasing on. 0123456 12345678 cavity numberForward Power (kW)no beam 1.1 mA w/o ER 1 mA with ER 2.4 mA with ER 3 mA with ER 3.5 mA with ER Figure 5: RF drive system forward powers for each cavity without beam, and without and with energy recovery at various current levels. 5 THE 10 KW UPGRADE The U.S. Navy has provided 9.3 M$ initial funding for an upgrade of this system to 10 kW. The envisioned u p- grade path will entail • doubling the injected current from 5 to 10 mA by increasing the bunch charge from 67 to 135 pC, • installation of two additional cryomodules to raise the beam energy to ~160 MeV, • upgrading the recirculator to accommodate higher beam energy and a new FEL insertion embedded in the machine backleg, and • implementation of a 32 m long R5 optical cavity [17] accommodating high power o peration on a 2- 10 µm bandwidth. Design, prototyping, and procurement activities are now underway; with anticipated follow-on funding upgrade commissioning is expected to commence in fall 2002. A description of the machine is available elsewhere [18]. 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This paper presents the work of members of the Je f- ferson Lab IR Demonstration FEL Project Team; I would like to thank them for their efforts and assistance in its preparation. I would also like to thank Dr. Jay Benesch for a careful reading of the text and many us e- ful suggestions. This work was supported by the Officeof Naval Research, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the U.S. Department of Energy through contract number DE-AC05-84ER40150. REFERENCES [1]G. Neil et al ., Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 4:662-5 (2000). [2]H. Liu et al., Nuc. Inst. Meth. A358: 475-8 (1995). [3]L. Merminga et al., PAC’99, pp. 1177-9, New York, 29 March-2 April 1999. [4]R. Li et al., PAC’97, Vancouver, May 1997; R. Li, EPAC’98, Stockholm, June 1998; R. Li., FEL’99, Hamburg, August 1999; R Li, EPAC’2000, Vienna, June 2000. [5]L. Merminga et al., “FEL-RF Instabilities in Reci r- culating, Energy-Recovering Linacs with an FEL”, FEL’99, Hamburg, August 1999. [6]D. Engwall et al., PAC’97, pp. 2693-5, Vancouver, May 1997. [7]P. Piot et al., EPAC’98, pp. 1447-9, Stockholm, June 1998; P. Piot et al., “Emittances and Energy Spread Studies in the Jefferson Lab Free-Electron Laser”, EPAC’2000, Vienna, June 2000. [8]H. Liu, private communication; B. Yunn, unpu b- lished. [9]J. Flanz et al., Nuc. Inst. Meth. A241:325-33 (1985). [10]L. Merminga et al., PAC’99, pp. 2456-8, New York, 29 March-2 April 1999; P. Piot et al., “Study of the Energy Compression Scheme to Energy Recover an Electron Beam in Presence of an FEL Interaction”, EPAC’2000, V ienna, June 2000. [11]T. Siggins et al., “Performance of the Photocathode Gun for the TJNAF FEL”, FEL’2000, Durham, N.C., August 2000. [12]E. Gillman et al., FEL’99, Hamburg, August 1999. [13]G. Krafft, PAC’99, pp. 2448-9, New York, 29 March-2 April 1999. [14]G. Krafft et al., PAC’99, pp. 2229-31, New York, 29 March-2 April 1999. [15]Jefferson Lab IR FEL user facility information is available on-line at http://www.jlab.org/FEL/. [16]S. Benson et al., “An Experimental Study of an FEL Oscillator with a Linear Taper”, FEL’2000, Du r- ham, N.C. , August 2000. [17]C. C. Shih et al., Nuc. Inst. Meth. A304:788 (1991). [18] D. Douglas et al., “Driver Accelerator Design for the 10 kW Upgrade of the Jefferson Lab IR FEL”, these proceedings. Figure 7: Typical FEL output spectrum (5 µm). Figure 8: Typical FEL detuning curve.

arXiv:physics/0007095v1 [physics.geo-ph] 28 Jul 2000Re-examination of log-periodicity observed in the seismic precursors of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake Y. Huang1and H. Saleur Department of Physics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles D. Sornette2,3 Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles Abstract. Based on several empirical evidence, a series of papers has advocated the concept that seismicity prior to a large earth quake can be understood in terms of the statistical physics of a critical phase transition. In this model, the cumulative seismic Benioff strain release ǫincreases as a power-law time-to-failure before the final event. This powe r law reflects a kind of scale invariance with respect to the distance to the c ritical point: ǫ is the same up to a simple rescaling λzafter the time-to-failure has been scaled by a factor λ. A few years ago, on the basis of a fit of the cumulative Benioff strain released prior to the 1989 Loma Prieta earthqu ake,Sornette and Sammis [1995] proposed that this scale invariance could be partial ly broken into a discrete scale invariance, defined such that th e scale invariance occurs only with respect to specific integer powers of a funda mental scale ratio. The observable consequence of discrete scale invari ance takes the form of log-periodic oscillations decorating the accelerating power law. They found that the quality of the fit and the predicted time of the event a re significantly improved by the introduction of log-periodicity. Here, we p resent a battery of synthetic tests performed to quantify the statistical si gnificance of this claim. We put special attention to the definition of syntheti c tests that are as much as possible identical to the real time series except f or the property to be tested, namely log-periodicity. Without this precaut ion, we would conclude that the existence of log-periodicity in the Loma P rieta cumulative Benioff strain is highly statistically significant. In contr ast, we find that log-periodic oscillations with frequency and regularity s imilar to those of the Loma Prieta case are very likely to be generated by the interp lay of the low pass filtering step due to the construction of cumulative fun ctions together with the approximate power law acceleration. Thus, the sing le Loma Prieta case alone cannot support the initial claim and additional c ases and further study are needed to increase the signal-to-noise ratio if an y. The present study will be a useful methodological benchmark for future testin g of additional events when the methodology and data to construct reliable B enioff strain function become available. 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern Cali- fornia, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740.2Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Cali- fornia, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567. 12 HUANG ET AL. 1. Introduction The idea that earthquakes are somewhat analogous to critical phenomena of statistical mechanics has been gaining ground in the last few decades [ Chelidze , 1982; All` egre et al. , 1982; Sornette and Sornette , 1990; Tu- markin and Shnirman , 1992; Sornette and Sammis , 1995;Newman et al. , 1995; Bowman et al. , 1998; Jaume and Sykes , 1999]. One of the consequences of this new point of view is that events occurring even several decades before a large main shock can be considered as seismic precursors, and that a study of this precursory seismicity might give a fairly good indication of when the impending major earthquake will take place, and how big it is going to be. Although such considerations are still in infancy, and the usual caveats about earth- quake prediction must be kept in one’s mind, a lot of work has already been devoted to “post-diction”, some- times with impressive success. One of the pioneering cases in that direction was the 1989 Loma Prieta earth- quake, where Sornette and Sammis [1995] proposed to see the empirical power law used by Bufe and Varnes [1993] in the perspective of criticality in the sense of statistical physics [ Sornette , 2000]. They found that the cumulative Benioff strain starting about 50 years ago could be well-fitted with a power law, giving rise to a post-diction for the main event of (1990 .3±4.1), a reasonably satisfactory result. Things got even more exciting after the paper of Sor- nette and Sammis [1995] where it was pointed out that the strong oscillations around the power law could be fitted as well using a complex exponent correction to scaling: ǫ(t) =A+B(tf−t)z{1+Ccos[ωlog(tf−t)+φ]}.(1) In this formula, the parameter tfis the time of the main shock (a pure power law would correspond to C= 0), and the best fit gave rise to an estimate tf= 1989 .9±0.8, considerably closer to the real date than the one in [ Bufe and Varnes , 1993], and with much less uncertainty. The existence of complex correction to scaling ex- ponents could be linked to an underlying discrete scale invariance, a very appealing property from a theoretical point of view: the initial observation in [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995] therefore spurred a lot of development [Saleur et al. , 1996a, b; Johansen et al. , 1996; Huang et al., 1998; Sornette , 1998; Bowman et al. , 1998; Jo- 3Laboratoire de Physique de la Matiere Condensee, CNRS UMR 6622 and Universit´ e de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, Fr ance.hansen et al. , 2000; Sammis and Smith , 1999; Jaume and Sykes , 1999]. Although the quality of the fit in Sornette and Sam- mis[1995] is, to the naked eye, impressively good, the suspicion arose recently that the oscillations in the Loma Prieta Benioff strain could be merely the result of noise. The synthetic tests performed in [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995] being somewhat incomplete, we have de- cided to reanalyze this question much more carefully in the present work. We have performed two types of synthetic tests to do this re-analysis. In the first type, we consider random power laws (ex- plained in Section 3), with parameters that match those of the real data, and study whether noise can give rise to log-periodic structures after integration. The advan- tage of this approach is that the two key ingredients of the analysis of the real data (power law and integration) are captured in a simple way. Its drawback is that the synthetic data (a sequence of random numbers drawn from a power law probability distribution, from which a cumulative quantity is constructed) is not quite of the same nature than the real data (a sequence of times and magnitudes, from which the cumulative Benioff strain is constructed). In particular, the sampling for the syn- thetic data is essentially periodic in log scale, and this effect, combined with integration, is expected to give rise to spurious log-periodic oscillations indeed. Nev- ertheless, we find the consideration of these synthetic tests quite useful, as it complement the considerations in [Huang et al. , 2000]. The second type of synthetic tests is devised es- pecially to avoid this issue of sampling: we generate data for both time and magnitude, in such a way that the probability distributions of the synthetic ( ts, ms) and the real ( tr, mr) quantities are the same. There is a problem in doing so: although the synthetic data and the real data have the same distribution, there is no guarantee that the cumulative Benioff strain con- structed form the synthetic sequences is really a power law, because a power law dependence involves higher- order statistics ( i.e., correlation and dependence) not captured by the one-point distribution functions. To preserve the feature of the real data that events are more frequent and with higher magnitudes when closer to the main shock (or the last data point), we added a reordering procedure which shuffles the synthetic se- quences in such a way that the event with the jthmag- nitude is at the same position as the real event with the jthmagnitude in the real sequence. We find that for both type of synthetic tests, it is,LOMA PRIETA LOG-PERIODICITY 3 surprisingly, highly possible to get spurious (that is, en- tirely due to noise) log-periodic oscillations which are as good as those observed in the real Loma Prieta data. This conclusion is made quantitative in a variety of ways, in particular by studying the highest peak of the spectrum of oscillations around the power law for the real data, and building the probability distribution of such peaks for synthetic data. We thus conclude that, at the present time, it is not possible to distinguish the log-periodic oscillations observed in [ Sornette and Sam- mis, 1995] from noise. The present study is related to [ Huang et al. , 2000]. The common theme is the investigation of the condi- tions under which log-periodicity can be created spon- taneously by noise. In [ Huang et al. , 2000], the goal is to study in details the underlying mechanism, re- lying solely on the manipulation of data: the gener- ally found non-uniform sampling together with a low pass filtering step, as occurs in constructing cumulative functions, in maximum likelihood estimations and de- trending, is enough to create apparent log-periodicity. A detailed exploration of this mechanism has been of- fered in [ Huang et al. , 2000] together with extensive numerical simulations to demonstrate all its main prop- erties. It was shown that this “synthetic” scenario for log-periodicity relies on two steps: 1) the fact that ap- proximately logarithmic sampling in time corresponds to uniform sampling in the logarithm of time; 2) integra- tion reddens the noise and, in a finite sample, creates a maximum in the spectrum leading to a most prob- able frequency in the logarithm of time. In [ Huang et al., 2000], this insight was then use to to analyze the 27 best aftershock sequences studied by [ Kisslinger and Jones , 1991] and search for traces of genuine log- periodic corrections to Omori’s law, which states that the earthquake rate decays approximately as the inverse of the time since the last main shock. The observed log- periodicity was shown to almost entirely result from the “synthetic scenario” due to the data analysis. From a statistical point of view, resolving the issue of the possible existence of log-periodicity in aftershocks will be very difficult as Omori’s law describes a point pro- cess with a uniform sampling in the logarithm of the time. By construction, strong log-periodic fluctuations are thus created by this logarithmic sampling. In con- trast, in the present paper, we apply the insight ob- tained in [ Huang et al. , 2000], to study accelerated power laws culminating in a finite-time singularity at timetf. To be complete, we should also point out the fol- lowing. Sornette and Sammis [1995] paper contains aforward prediction of an earthquake in the Komman- dorski Island region at time tf= 1996 .3±1.1 year. Forward predictions provide a much larger statistical significance since the model parameters are estimated independently and outside their domain of application (see below the discussion in the section on the analy- sis procedure). Forward prediction has also the qual- ity of increasing the number of cases. The prediction of a critical time is not enough, one must specify the magnitude of the predicted earthquake. In [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995], the magnitude was not specified but can probably be taken following the specification ofBufe et al. [1994] of a magnitude in the range 7.5- 8.5 occurring in a zone originally outlined by Nishenko [1991]. The largest earthquake in the Harvard catalog during the time period 1994-1998 has a moment mag- nitude MW= 6.6 (1996/07/16, 56.16N, 164.98E). The same event has the magnitude MS= 6.4 in the PDE catalog. If the prediction is considered correct only if both its time and magnitude range is as predicted, this prediction is a failure. However, it is hard to draw any firm conclusion based on this single case with respect to usefulness of the critical earthquake concept and of log-periodicity as the methodology has evolved signifi- cantly since the initial paper of Sornette and Sammis [1995] (see for instance [ Bowman et al. , 1998; Ouillon and Sornette , 2000]). The plan of this paper is as follows. In Section 2 we present some general observations on synthetic tests and their interpretations. Details on our two types of tests, together with their results, are presented in Sections 3 and 4. Our conclusions are collected in Section 5. 2. Analysis Procedure Usually, the major problem in establishing the sta- tistical significance of a forecasting procedure is its ret- rospective character involving a limited number of data and a significant number of explicit (the parameters of the fit) and implicit (the total time and space windows used, etc.) degrees of freedom. In such situations, the calculation of statistical significance becomes very dif- ficult and uncertain as soon as the adjustable parame- ters are determined from the data. The conclusions can then be artifacts of the processing technique or of a se- lection bias. The paper of Sornette and Sammis [1995] certainly suffers from this problem. Since there are no general methods or techniques that would allow us to overcome these difficulties, we stick to a more modest approach, which turns out to be sufficient to draw a clear and meaningful conclusion.4 HUANG ET AL. We develop two types of synthetic tests. For both types, the key part is the comparison of the log-periodic oscillations in the real seismicity to those in the syn- thetic sequences. Similar oscillations should have simi- lar frequencies and similar regularities, and this can best be quantified by considering the spectrum of these os- cillations. We focus on the highest peak (characterized by angular frequency ωand peak height h) in the spec- trum, which quantifies the most significant frequency component in the oscillations as a function of log( tf−t) (since we are looking for log-periodicity). The Lomb method [ Press et al. , 1992] is used instead of the usual Fourier Transform, since the data points are not equidis- tantly spaced. The ultimate purpose of synthetic tests is to get the significance level (the probability of getting the same thing by accident) of the real observation. One natural way of evaluating the significance level would be, it seems, to count the number of synthetic peaks (defined as spectral components with spectral power higher than neighboring frequencies, in other words, local maximums in the spectrum) within the intervals ωs∈[ωr−∆, ωr+ ∆] and hs≥hr(superscript s, rde- note synthetic and real data respectively), and to nor- malize this by the total number of synthetic peaks. This might however lead to incorrect conclusions. For in- stance, suppose that, from 10000 synthetic peaks, only one peak with peak height higher than 10 (the height of the real peak) and angular frequency ωin the range of [π,2π] was found: could we conclude that the sig- nificance level is 0 .01% (or confidence level of 99 .99%)? Probably not. To see why, suppose the distribution of ω’s were uniform in [0 ,40], and the distribution in peak height uniform in [6 .862,10.004]: then the probability of observing one peak of height above 10 and ω∈[π,2π] would roughly be 1/10000. But this small probability does not mean that the peak of height above 10 and ω∈[π,2π] is highly significant! Due to the uniform distribution in both ωand peak height, any other pair of (ω, h) would have, in fact, been observed with the same probability. To draw positive conclusions from such a simple counting analysis, one would need to have in advance a theory indicating where the peak should be found, and approximately at what height. It is not clear that there is such a thing at present, and therefore we prefer to use a more conservative approach. In the language of statistics, this question is related to the difference between first-order and second-order statistics. In first-order statistics, we ask: “what is the probability to observe the peak we see just by chance?” In second-order statistics, we ask: “what is the prob-ability to observe some (first-order significant) peak somewhere (whatever its position)?” In our context, the determination of the confidence level within first- order statistics requires that we have an a priori under- standing of where the peak should be found. In the absence of any theoretical predictions, it seems natural, to quantify the significance level of the log- periodic oscillations, to rely somehow on the probabil- ity distribution of ωand peak height in the synthetic samples, i.e. to rely on second-order statistics. We have not managed to come up with a totally satisfactory, ob- jective way to use this probability distribution however. A useful quantity we came up with–but it should not be trusted blindly–is the ratio Rof the probability of observing a given peak to the probability of observing the most probable peak: if the ratio is close to 1, this surely indicates that the peak is not very significant. To obtain this ratio, one needs the probability den- sity function p(ω, h) of the synthetic peaks: the latter can be constructed using the Kernel Density method [Silverman , 1986; Beardah , 1995]. We then set R= p(ωr,hr)dω dh p(ωmp,hmp)dω dhwhere ( ωr, hr) characterize the real peak, and (ωmp, hmp) is the most probable synthetic peak. The ratio quantifies how frequently in synthetic se- quences we can observe log-periodicity similar to that observed in the real sequence. There are some technical advantages in using this ratio. For instance, there is in fact no arbitrariness in choosing the intervals dωand dh, since they cancel out between the numerator and the denominator: it is then enough to just use the func- tion value of p(ω, h) at (ωr, hr) and ( ωmp, hmp). Also, the special choices (e.g., the degree of smoothing and the type of kernels) made in constructing the probabil- ity density function p(ω, h) hopefully also cancel out in the ratio, and have little influence on the final result. The generation of synthetic data and extraction of oscillations depend on the type of synthetic tests and will be explained separately in the following sections. 3. Synthetic Test I 3.1. Generation of Synthetic Data We start from a simple method which takes into ac- count the most crucial features of the real data. We then refine this method in several ways in Section 4. The crucial features of the real data are power law and integration. The latter–considering the cumula- tive Benioff strain–is necessary for numerical reasons, as there are not enough data points to study directly the rate at which energy is released (moreover, consid-LOMA PRIETA LOG-PERIODICITY 5 ering the rate leads to other difficulties, like the influ- ence of the binning intervals etc). We therefore take a pure power law as the null hypothesis, and generate data with a probability density fitting the power law part of dǫ/dt: we mimic real data as closely as possi- ble, taking in particular the same number of points. We then construct a synthetic cumulative Benioff strain by numerical integration, and investigate whether noise in the sampling of the power law can give rise to spurious log-periodic oscillations. Again, the power law is dǫ(t) dt∝(tf−t)m−1(2) following (1) in [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995]. We as- sume the range for tis [t0, t1] with t1< tfto avoid the singularity at tf. After normalization, we have dǫ(t) dt=m (tf−t0)m−(tf−t1)m(tf−t)(m−1).(3) For the real seismic precursors, tis the time of occur- rence of an earthquake, for synthetic events tis a ran- dom variable with probability function p(t) =dǫ(t) dt. To make sure the synthetic events and the real seismic pre- cursors have the same power law distribution, we chose the same parameters t0, t1, tf, m, N (from Table I and Figure 1 of [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995]), where Nis the number of events. (Since the original data was not available at the time of this study, we retrieved data from the CNSS catalog using their space-time- magnitude window. However, due to some unknown reason, our data set was slightly different from their data set. We got only 27 events instead of 31.) The ran- dom variable twith given p(t) can be transformed from a random variable xuniformly distributed on [ x0, x1] by solving [ Press et al. , 1992] p(x)dx=p(t)dt. The transformation is t=tf−[(tf−t0)m −x−x0 x1−x0((tf−t0)m−(tf−t1)m)/bracketrightbigg1 m .(4) We then construct the cumulative distribution function oftand use this function to mimic the cumulative Be- nioff strain of the real sequence. They have the same power law parameters and they are both, indeed con- structed from integration.3.2. Extraction of Oscillations The original analysis procedure used in [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995] was to fit the cumulative Benioff strain to a power law with log-periodic oscillations ((1), the same as (8) in [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995]). The qual- ity of the observed log-periodicity was not quantified in [Sornette and Sammis , 1995] other than by showing that the quality of the fit measured by the residue as well as the predicted critical time tfwere both substan- tially improved compared to those from the fit with the simple power law, but for our study, it is crucial to do so. To get the oscillations, we first fit a power law with log-periodic oscillations (1) to both the real and syn- thetic data. The pure power law part (obtained by set- tingC= 0 in (1) is then subtracted, and we obtain the remaining oscillations. These oscillations are in turn analyzed using the procedure outlined in Section 2. 3.3. Results 3.3.1. The real sequence. We first characterize the log-periodicity observed in the real sequence. The fit of (1) to the real data is remarkable (Figure 1). The oscillations around the power law part show approxi- mately 2.5 cycles of regular oscillations (Figure 2), the spectrum of which has a peak near ωr∼6.1 with height hr∼7.5 (Figure 3), which is significantly different from Gaussian noise (the chance of observing such a peak from Gaussian noise of the same number of data points is less than 2% according to (13.8.7) of [ Press et al. , 1992].). However, since we are dealing with oscilla- tions around a cumulative quantity, integrated Gaus- sian noise would be a more appropriate null hypothesis. We will study the chance of observing such a peak from integrated Gaussian noise in Section 3.3.2. 3.3.2. Synthetic sequences. 300 synthetic sequences were generated using the parameters of the seismic precursors for the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. They were analyzed in the same way as the real precur- sor sequence. See Figures 4, 5, and 6 for typical re- sults. We note that it is possible to observe synthetic sequences which are remarkably similar to the real se- quence: similar amplitude of oscillations, similar fre- quency, and similar regularity. In the following part, we quantify how frequently such sequences can actually be observed. The distribution function of the frequencies and peak heights of the synthetic sequences were constructed us- ing the Kernel Density method [ Silverman , 1986; Bear- dah, 1995] (Figure 7). The real peak is not far from6 HUANG ET AL. 1920 1940 1960 1980 200000.20.40.60.81 t(year)Normalized cumulative Benioff strain Figure 1. The fit of a power law with log-periodic os- cillations to the normalized cumulative Benioff strain of the seismic precursors of the 1989 Loma Prieta earth- quake. 100101102−0.1−0.0500.050.1 tf−t(year)oscillations Figure 2. The oscillations around the power law of the normalized cumulative Benioff strain of the seismic precursors of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.051015202502468 ωLomb Power Figure 3. The Lomb Periodogram of the oscillations shown in Figure 2. 1920 1940 1960 1980 200000.20.40.60.81Cumulative number of events t(year) Figure 4. Plot of a quantity similar to that in Figure 1 from a synthetic sequence.LOMA PRIETA LOG-PERIODICITY 7 101−0.06−0.04−0.0200.020.040.06Oscillations tf−t(year) Figure 5. Plot of a quantity similar to that in Figure 2 from a synthetic sequence. 05101520250246810 ωLomb Power Figure 6. Plot of a quantity similar to that in Figure 3 from a synthetic sequence.10 20 30 510150.010.020.030.04 Peak heightω Figure 7. The distribution function of frequencies and peak heights from the synthetic sequences. The position of the real peak is marked by the vertical line. the most probable synthetic peak. From the distribu- tion function (Figure 7), we find that the probability density function at the most probable synthetic peak is proportional to 0 .031, while it is proportional to 0 .016 at value of ωandhcorresponding to the real peak. The ratio of these two quantities is close to one half. If we look at the separate distribution of frequencies and peak heights (Figures 9 and 10), we see that the frequency from the real sequence is slightly higher than the most probable synthetic peak, and the peak height of the real sequence is almost the most probable synthetic peak height. Note that the frequencies from synthetic se- quences have a rather narrow distribution, as expected from [Huang , 1999; Huang et al. , 2000]. The regularity of oscillations observed in the real sequence (Figure 1, quantified by the peak height) is not surprising due to the strong smoothing effect of integration [ Huang , 1999; Huang et al. , 2000]. When the same analysis procedure was applied to both the real data and the synthetic data, this kind of regularity is observed in both the real data and the synthetic data. 4. Synthetic Test II 4.1. Generation of Synthetic Data For synthetic tests to be effective, the synthetic data should differ from the real ones by only one characteristic–the characteristic to be tested. Since in our problem we want to test log-periodicity in the oscil- lations around a power law, the synthetic data should8 HUANG ET AL. 0 10 20 30 4005101520Peak height ω Figure 8. 2D map view of Figure 7. Each circle rep- resents one synthetic peak. The frequency of the real peak is marked by the vertical line, peak height by the horizontal line. 0 5 10 15 2000.050.10.150.2 ωProbability density Figure 9. The distribution of the synthetic frequen- cies. The vertical line marks the position of the real fre- quency. The two diamonds ( ⋄) mark the FWHM (full- width-half-maximum) of the distribution (the same for all subsequent similar plots).0 5 10 15 2000.050.10.150.2 Peak heightProbability density Figure 10. The distribution of the synthetic peak heights. The vertical line marks the position of the real peak height. be the same power law but with known noise (could be additional data errors or random fluctuations.). Since the power law of the cumulative Benioff strain is in fact implied by the magnitude distribution and the tempo- ral spacing between events and their correlations, we have to generate synthetic magnitude msand time ts to get the same power law. tsandmsshould be random numbers having the same probability distribution as t andm, because in our observations we had control over neither tnorm. In this light, the analysis in Section 3 is thus a bit oversimplified; we now refine it. One difficulty in generating synthetic tsandmsis that the theoretical probability density function ( pd f) of magnitudes and times for our real data is unknown. This problem can be solved by using the empirical pd f constructed from the real data. However, we should not use the empirical pd fdirectly, otherwise all features of the real data would be reproduced in the synthetic data. For example, the empirical distribution of the real time sequence (Figure 11) shows some regular os- cillations (that could well be genuine physically-based log-periodic oscillations) around its general trend. If we used exactly this empirical distribution to gen- erate the synthetic time sequences, all synthetic se- quences would show similar regular oscillations: this is of course not appropriate, since what we want to test is precisely whether these oscillations are the result of noise. Therefore, we decided to use only the general trend of the experimental data to generate our synthetic samples. This general trend is obtained by smoothingLOMA PRIETA LOG-PERIODICITY 9 194019501960197019800.20.40.60.81 t(year)Cumulative distribution function Figure 11. The normalized cumulative number of events up to time t of the time sequence of the seismic precursors of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake (solid line connecting circles). The other solid line is the em- pirical line repeatedly smoothed (50 times) by 3-point moving average. the empirical distribution. Three-point moving average was applied repeatedly 50 times (10 for smoothing the cumulative distribution function of magnitudes). The number of times is not crucial as long as the oscilla- tions were wiped out. The criteria for our choice are closeness to the empirical curve and lack of oscillations. Similar considerations were applied to the generation of synthetic magnitude sequence. The assumption for the general trend was not crucial. A reasonable one, close to the empirical cumulative distribution curve but without the fluctuations, would suffice. The next difficulty is that, for a sequence of times and magnitudes generated using this method, there is no guarantee that the cumulative Benioff strain will fol- low a power law. The time sequence more or less follows a power law (we have verified that the cumulative num- ber of events of the seismic precursors of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake is similar to the cumulative Benioff strain in power law and log-periodic oscillations), but, when combined with the magnitude sequence to con- struct the whole Benioff strain curve, there is no ob- vious reason why we should always get a power law. It is natural to expect that the power law of the real sequence comes mainly from the fact that events oc- cur more frequently with increasing magnitude (trend only) when closer to the main shock. To preserve this feature in the synthetic sequences, we decided to re-1940195019601970198055.25.45.65.8 t(year)Magnitude Figure 12. Synthetic magnitude sequence ( +). The real sequence is plotted with o. 1940195019601970198051015202530 t(year)Cumulative number Figure 13. Synthetic time sequence ( +). The real se- quence is plotted with o. order the events in the synthetic sequence such that the event of the kthmagnitude would oc- cur at the same position in both the real and the synthetic cases (for example, both the real sequence and the synthetic sequences have the event of the second biggest magnitude being the kthone in the sequence). This reordering scheme is applied only to the magnitude sequence (time sequence is an ordered sequence by definition). One example is shown in Figures 12 and 13. We performed synthetic tests both with and without the reordering scheme. In fact, the re-10 HUANG ET AL. sults turned out to be almost identical. 4.2. Extraction of Oscillations The method of extracting oscillations from the cumulative Benioff strain is slightly different from that of Section 3.2, however the difference turns out to be insignificant. Two ways are possible to obtain the oscilla- tions: the first involves extracting the best-fit power law from the real data. The drawback of this approach is that power law fits are often not as stable as fits including the log-periodic corrections. Sometimes (around 8% of all cases) the fit even converges to a tfsmaller than the time of the last data point, thus tf−tis neg- ative and (tf−t)(m−1)is complex since m < 1, which is of course unphysical. The advantage of this approach is that log-periodicity is not as- sumed in the first place. The second approach involves extracting the power law obtained from a best-fit power law with log-periodic oscilla- tions [ Johansen and Sornette , 1999a, b; Johansen et al., 1999]. The advantage here is that the fit always converges well, but now log-periodicity is somewhat assumed from the very beginning. The more positive view point advocated in [ Jo- hansen and Sornette , 1999a, b; Johansen et al. , 1999] to justify this procedure is that fitting with log- periodicity allows one to take the most probably noise into account [ Huang et al. , 2000] and thus to obtain a good pure power law representation by putting the coefficient C= 0. In practice, the results of either approach were very similar: in the following, we report only the results using the second one. It is of course crucial to use exactly the same analysis procedure for both the real data and the synthetic data, otherwise features generated by the analysis procedure for the real data may not be detected by the synthetic tests. The cumulative Benioff strain was first con- structed from the magnitude sequence mi: ǫi=i/summationdisplay j=1100.75mj(5) and then normalized such that ǫmax= 1(the unit was changed without influencing the con- clusion). As in [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995], the cumulative Benioff strain was then fitted to a power law with log-periodic oscillations.194019501960197019800.20.40.60.81 t(year)Normalized Benioff strain Figure 14. The fitting of the normalized cumulative Benioff strain of the 30 seismic precursors of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake to (1). The de-trended data were obtained by [ Jo- hansen and Sornette , 1999a, b; Johansen et al. , 1999] detrn =ǫ(t)−A B(tf−t)z(6) which should be either noise or pure log-periodic cosine according to (1), and then analyzed by the procedure explained in Section 2. 4.3. Results 4.3.1. The real sequence. The fitting of the real data showed good agreement between the real data and the theoretical curve (Figure 14). There was a peak at ω= 6.1in the spectrum of the de-trended data (Figure 16), close to the best-fit parameter ω= 5.7. 4.3.2. Synthetic sequences. 1000 synthetic se- quences (one example in Figures 12 and 13) were analyzed using the same procedure as that for the real sequence. The cumulative Benioff strain of the synthetic sequence showed obvious simi- larity to the real data (Figure 17). We first checked whether the synthetic data gave rise to power laws. The method to do this was to fit these data to a power law shape, and measure the summed square of error (SSE) from the fitting: in about 50% of the cases, the syn- thetic sequences had an SSE smaller than that of the real sequence, indicating that they were roughly as good power laws as the real data.LOMA PRIETA LOG-PERIODICITY 11 −1 01234−3−2−10123 log(tf−t)De-trended Benioff strain Figure 15. The de-trended data of the normalized Benioff strain of the 30 seismic precursors of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. 051015202501234567 ωNormalized Lomb density Figure 16. Spectrum of the de-trended data in Figure 15.1920 1940 1960 1980 200000.20.40.60.811.21.4 t(year)Normalized Benioff strain Figure 17. The fitting of the normalized cumulative Benioff strain of one synthetic sequence to (1). We note here that the ratio of the probabil- ity of observing a synthetic sequence with SSE similar to that from the real sequence divided by the probability of observing a synthetic se- quence with the most probable SSE is around 79%. If we used SSE to measure the goodness of the power law model for our synthetic data, the real sequence would be very close to the most probable synthetic sequence. We then compared the fit of a power law with log-periodic oscillations to the real and the syn- thetic sequences. The SSE of the synthetic sequences are in the range [0.005, 0.05], centered around the SSE from the real sequence ( ∼0.013). There are around 1/4 of the synthetic sequences that have a SSE smaller than that from the real sequence. The ratio of the probability of observing a syn- thetic sequence with SSE similar to that from the real sequence and the probability of observ- ing a synthetic sequence with the most proba- ble SSE is around 96%. If we use SSE to mea- sure the regularity of log-periodic oscillations, the real sequence is thus very close to the most probable synthetic sequence. The tffrom the synthetic sequences is dis- tributed in [1988,1995] (Figure 18). The ratio of the probability of observing a synthetic se- quence with tfsimilar to that from the real se- quence divided by the probability of observing a synthetic sequence with the most probable tfis12 HUANG ET AL. 1985 1990 1995 200000.050.10.15 tf(year)Probability density Figure 18. The distribution of main shock times ( tf in (1)) from the synthetic sequences. The vertical line marks the value from the real sequence. around 95%. Thus the apparent accurate pre- diction of the actual main-shock time for the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake [ Sornette and Sam- mis, 1995] might be due to chance. The width of the distribution (FWHM, full width at half max- imum) is 6.8 years, narrower than that from the fit of a pure power law (7.8 years), suggesting that log-periodicity may improve power law fits by accounting for the most probable noise [ Huang et al., 2000]. There is a well-defined peak in the distribu- tion of the frequencies of the log-periodic os- cillations from the fitting of the synthetic se- quences (Figure 19). The ratio of the proba- bility of observing a synthetic sequence with fre- quency similar to that from the real sequence di- vided by the probability of observing a synthetic sequence with the most probable frequency is around 81%. We summarize the above results in Table 1. We now turn to the statistics from the char- acterization of log-periodicity by spectral anal- ysis of the de-trended data. If we only look at the distribution of peak heights, the ratio of the probability observing a synthetic peak similar to the real peak divided by the probability of observing the most probable synthetic peak is around 99.9% (Figure 20). If we only look at the frequencies, the ratio of the probability of observing a synthetic fre-024681000.050.10.150.20.250.3 ωProbability density Figure 19. The distribution of frequencies of log- periodic oscillations from the fitting of the synthetic sequences. The vertical line marks the value from the real sequence. 0 5 10 15 2000.050.10.15 Peak heightProbability density Figure 20. The distribution of peak heights from the de-trended data. The vertical line marks the value from the real sequence.LOMA PRIETA LOG-PERIODICITY 13 Table 1. Parameters From the Fit of the Synthetic Data With PW (Pure Po wer Law) and PWLG (Power Law With Log-Periodic Oscillations) prapmpbratio mpcrdlefterightfFWHMg m 0.72 1.99 0.36 0.34 0.69 0.17 0.57 0.40 PW tc 0.073 0.13 0.56 1994.3 1988.7 1988.4 1996.2 7.8 SSE 20.0 24.9 0.79 0.028 0.037 0.016 0.052 0.036 m 1.94 2.23 0.87 0.45 0.52 0.25 0.63 0.38 tc 0.13 0.14 0.95 1990.5 1989.8 1988.1 1994.8 6.8 PWLG SSE 50.0 51.8 0.96 0.015 0.017 0.0092 0.026 0.014 w 0.21 0.26 0.81 4.28 5.67 3.16 6.99 3.83 C 2.84 6.71 0.42 -0.039 -0.083 -0.078 0.075 0.15 aValue of the probability density function at a synthetic pea k similar to the real peak. bValue of the probability density function at the most probab le synthetic peak. cThe most probable value from synthetic data. dThe value from real data. eValue at the left point of the FWHM of the distribution of synt hetic values. fValue at the right point of the FWHM of the distribution of syn thetic values. gFull width at Half Maximum of a peak. 024681000.050.10.150.20.25 ωProbability density Figure 21. The distribution of frequencies from the de-trended data. The vertical line marks the value from the real sequence. quency similar to that of the real peak divided by the probability of observing the most prob- able synthetic frequency is around 56% (Figure 21). When we look at the joint distribution of peakheights and frequencies, the ratio of the proba- bility for observing a peak similar to the real peak divided by the probability of observing the most probable synthetic peak is about 56% (Fig- ures 22 and 23). 0 20 40010200.010.020.03 ω Peak height Figure 22. The distribution of peak heights and fre- quencies from the de-trended data. Not using the reordering scheme did not sig-14 HUANG ET AL. 01020304050051015202530 ωPeak height Figure 23. The 2D map view of Figure 22. The ver- tical and horizontal lines mark the values from the real sequence. nificantly change the above results, except that, for some synthetic sequences, the power law was not good. Also, recall that the foregoing results involved fitting data to a power law with log-periodic os- cillations, then de-trending. Fitting data to a pure power law instead produced very similar results. We summarize all the results in the previous sections in Table 2. 5. Discussion These synthetic tests were performed to de- termine whether it is possible to observe the re- ported log-periodicity [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995] from integrated noise in power laws, and if possible, how big the probability is. We found that, if we use the highest peak of the spectrum of the oscil- lations around the power law of the cumulative Benioff strain to quantify the log-periodicity in the oscillations, peaks similar to the peak ob- served from the real sequence (the real peak) were indeed frequently observed from the syn- thetic sequences. The odds of observing a syn- thetic peak similar to the real peak is more than 50% of the odds of observing the most probable synthetic peak. It is reasonable to use the highest peak in theTable 2. Synthetic Tests of the Log-Periodicity Ob- served in the Benioff Strain of the Seismic Precursors of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake EOPWaDe-trended data prbpmpcratio pr pmp ratio ω 0.11 0.11 0.99 0.12 0.22 0.56 h 0.19 0.20 0.93 0.12 0.12 1.00 (ω,h) 0.027 0.031 0.89 0.016 0.029 0.56 (ω,h)d0.020 0.025 0.81 0.16 0.23 0.73 aExtracted oscillations using the best-fit pure power law. bValue of the probability density function at a synthetic peak similar to the real peak. cValue of the probability density function at the most probable synthetic peak. dNo reordering. spectrum of a signal to quantify the most sig- nificant frequency component in the signal. The position of the peak is the frequency ( ω), and the peak height ( h) quantifies the regularity of that frequency component. If two signals have similar peaks in their spectrums, they must have oscillations of similar frequency and regularity. Peaks similar to the real peak were observed frequently from the synthetic sequences. To quantify this frequency of observation, we con- structed the probability density function p(ω, h) of the synthetic peaks in the space of (ω, h). From p(ω, h), we were able to obtain the prob- ability of observing a synthetic peak similar to the real peak (ωr, hr), that is p(ωr, hr)dω dh. This probability might be a small number, which is meaningful only when compared with the prob- ability of observing the most probable synthetic peak, which is p(ωmp, hmp)dω dh. The ratio of the two probabilities quantifies well how frequently we observe the feature from synthetic data. The mechanism at the origin of log-periodicity in the synthetic data sets has been discussed in [Huang , 1999; Huang et al. , 2000]. Briefly, log- periodicity results from the fact that taking the cumulative of a power law involves a low pass filtering step (reddening of the noise) which, in a finite sample, creates a maximum in the spec-LOMA PRIETA LOG-PERIODICITY 15 trum leading to a most probable log-frequency corresponding approximately to 1.5cycles over the full sampled interval. We looked into two quantities for log-periodicity in the oscillations around the power law of the cumulative Benioff strain. The extracted oscilla- tions are the difference between the data and the best-fit power law. The de-trended data were obtained using (6). For both of them, the ra- tio of the two probabilities is bigger than 50%, which means that it is not only possible to ob- serve that kind of log-periodicity in synthetic data, but also highly probable. Our synthetic events and the real events have the same distribution in time and magnitude, and they were analyzed in exactly the same way. Since discrete scale invariance is not present in the synthetic data, the log-periodicity observed in the real sequence cannot be used as evidence for discrete scale invariance. In fact, even the power law–used as evidence of ordinary scale invariance–could also be ex- plained by other mechanisms. Indeed, the cu- mulative Benioff strains of the synthetic se- quences in Section 4 do follow power laws sim- ilar to that of the real sequence. For the real sequence, the cumulative distribution function of event times is not significantly different from a straight line. The cumulative distribution of moments is not a power law either ( Sshape in- stead of the usual power law shape) (this is an ad hoc statement. The reason is that for this se- quence of magnitudes, the number of data points is small (only 30) and the magnitude cut-off is very high (5.0). So even if in general the moment distribution is a power law, large statistical fluc- tuations may make the moment distribution of this sequence non power law. We use an em- pirical distribution function instead of the usual power law assumption to avoid dependence on that assumption. In fact our method will still be valid no matter what the underlying distri- bution is.). But for the real sequence, mag- nitudes tends to be bigger when closer to the main shock, especially for the last several events [Jones, 1994]. Since small difference in magni- tudes will be translated into quite big difference in the cumulative Benioff strain, the last several events would make the would-be linear trend bend upward which happens to be well described by a power law of small exponent. Since this in-creasing tendency of magnitudes was preserved in the generation of synthetic magnitudes, power laws are also good for describing the synthetic data. In fact, without the re-ordering scheme to preserve that feature of magnitudes, we were still able to obtain similar results. As long as the magnitudes are not exactly uniform, the largest magnitude will bend the would-be linear trend somewhere, and power law with small exponents can still describe the data well. The improved accuracy of the prediction of the main shock time of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake by consideration of log-periodic os- cillations was regarded as a evidence support- ing the hypothesis in [ Sornette and Sammis , 1995]. However, from the study presented here, it is not rare to obtain tfnear that value from our synthetic data containing events in the range of [1940,1988]. If we use a power law to describe the data, by definition tfshould be slightly big- ger than the time of the last data point. In- deed, from our simulations, we found that tfis distributed in [1988,1995], and the chance of ob- serving a synthetic tfsimilar to the real tfis around 95% of the probability of observing the most probable synthetic tf. The point is, given a sequence of events in that time range and a power law assumption, that kind of tfis not hard to find. It is important to emphasize that the present study does not alter the usefulness of studying seismic precursors. However, the physical in- terpretation associated with the observations in [Sornette and Sammis , 1995] does not seem to be warranted, at least on the face of the Loma Pri- eta case only. However, as pointed out in [ Huang et al., 2000] and also found in this paper, log- periodic oscillations are robust features of power laws. The present analysis as well as those given in [Huang et al. , 2000] suggests that, whatever their origin (noise or physical), they might still be used to improve the prediction of the main event. This is clearly what we observe in our synthetic tests performed on pure power laws without log-periodicity: a power law fit with log-periodicity has a better estimate for tfthan a pure power law without the log-periodic os- cillations. The reason may be that, by fitting the most probable form of noise, the fit is more stable. It seems worthwhile to investigate this possibility further in future studies.16 HUANG ET AL. Acknowledgments. We are grateful to A. Jo- hansen and C. Sammis for their help in retrieving the data and to Rick Schoenberg and Y.Y. Kagan as referees for constructive remarks. References All` egre, C., J. L. Mouel, and A. Provost, Scal- ing rules in rock fracture and possible implica- tions for earthquake prediction, Nature ,297, 47–9, 1982. Beardah, C., Kernel Density Estimation Demonstrations– Help Sheet , The Nottingham Trent University, Clifton, Nottingham NG11 8NS, United King- dom, 1995. Bowman, D., G. Ouillon, C. Sammis, A. Sornette, and D. Sornette, An observational test of the critical earthquake concept, J. Geophys. Res. ,103, 24,359–72, 1998. Bufe, C., and D. Varnes, Predictive modeling of the seismic cycle of the greater San Francisco bay region, J. Geophys. Res. ,98, 9871–9883, 1993. Bufe, C., S. Nishenko, and D. Varnes, Seismic- ity trends and potential for large earthquakes in the Alaska-Aleutian region, Pure and Applied Geo- physics ,142, 83–99, 1994. Chelidze, T., Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. ,28, 93, 1982. Huang, Y., Log-periodicity: Sources, characteri- zation, identification, and possible applications, Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California, 1999. Huang, Y., H. Saleur, C. Sammis, and D. Sor- nette, Precursors, aftershocks, criticality and self-organized criticality, Europhys. Lett. ,41, 43– 48, 1998. Huang, Y., A. Johansen, M. Lee, H. Saleur, and D. Sornette, Mechanisms for log-periodicity in under-sampled data: Relevance for earth- quake aftershocks, J. Geophys. Res., in press , 2000, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9911421. Jaume, S., and L. Sykes, Evolving towards a crit- ical point: a review of accelerating seismic mo- ment/energy release prior to large and great earthquakes, Pure and Applied Geophysics ,155, 279– 305, 1999. Johansen, A., and D. Sornette, Critical crashes, Risk,12, 91–94, 1999a. Johansen, A., and D. Sornette, Modeling the stock market prior to large crashes, Euro. Phys. J. B ,9, 1999b. Johansen, A., D. Sornette, H. Wakita, U. Tsunogai, W. Newman, and H. Saleur, Discrete scaling in earthquake precursory phenomena: Evidence in the Kobe earthquake, Japan, J. Phys. I ,6, 1391– 1402, 1996. Johansen, A., D. Sornette, and O. Ledoit, Pre- dicting financial crashes using discrete scaleinvariance, Journal of Risk ,1, 5–32, 1999, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9903321. Johansen, A., H. Saleur, and D. Sornette, New evi- dence of earthquake precursory phenomena in the 17 January 1995 Kobe earthquake, Japan, Euro. Phys. J. B ,15, 551–5, 2000. Jones, L., Foreshocks, aftershocks, and earthquake probabilities: Accounting for the landers earth- quake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. ,84, 892–899, 1994. Kisslinger, C., and L. Jones, Properties of after- shock sequences in southern California, J. Geo- phys. Res. ,96, 11,947–58, 1991. Newman, W., D. Turcotte, and A. Garielov, Log- periodic behavior of a hierarchical failure model with applications to precursory seismic activa- tion, Phys. Rev. E ,42, 4827, 1995. Nishenko, S., Circum-Pacific seismic potential– 1989-1999, Pure and Applied Geophysics ,135, 169– 259, 1991. Ouillon, G., and D. Sornette, The critical earth- quake concept applied to mine rock bursts with time-to-failure analysis, in The Earth, Earthquakes and Seismic Waves: The Knopoff Volume , Geophys. J. Int. Monograph, 2000. Press, W., S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, and B. Flan- nery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Sci- entific Computing , Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1992. Saleur, H., C. Sammis, and D. Sornette, Renor- malization group theory of earthquakes, Nonlinear Processes Geophys. ,3, 102, 1996a. Saleur, H., C. Sammis, and D. Sornette, Discrete scale invariance, complex fractal dimensions, and log-periodic fluctuations in seismicity, J. Geophys. Res.,101, 17,661–17,677, 1996b. Sammis, C., and S. Smith, Seismic cycles and evo- lution of stress correlation in cellular automaton models of finite fault networks, Pure and Applied Geophysics ,155, 307–344, 1999. Silverman, B., Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , no. 26 in Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Chapman & Hall, London, 1986. Sornette, A., and D. Sornette, Tectonophysics ,179, 327, 1990. Sornette, D., Discrete scale invariance and complex dimensions, Physics Reports ,297, 239–270, 1998. Sornette, D., Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences, Chaos, Fractals, Self-organization and Disorder: Con- cepts and Tools , Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2000. Sornette, D., and C. Sammis, Complex critical ex- ponents from renormalization group theory of earthquakes: implications for earthquake predic- tions, J. Phys. I , pp. 607–619, 1995. Tumarkin, A., and M. Shnirman, Computational seis- mology ,25, 63, 1992.LOMA PRIETA LOG-PERIODICITY 17 Y. Huang and H. Saleur, Department of physics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0484. (e-mail: yue- qiang@earth.usc.edu; saleur@physics1.usc.edu) D. Sornette, Institute of Geophysics and Plan- etary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567. (e-mail: Di-dier.Sornette@unice.fr) Received December 23, 1999; revised June 12, 2000; ac- cepted ?. This preprint was prepared with AGU’s L ATEX macros v5.01, with the extension package ‘AGU++’ by P. W. Daly, version 1.6b from 1999/08/19.

arXiv:physics/0007096v1 [physics.bio-ph] 28 Jul 2000Re-examination of the “3/4-law” of Metabolism Peter Sheridan Dodds,1, 2,∗Daniel H. Rothman,2,†and Joshua S. Weitz2, 3,‡ 1Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Tec hnology, Cambridge, MA 02139. 2Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 0213 9. 3Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technol ogy, Cambridge, MA 02139. (Dated: February 2, 2008) We examine the scaling law B∝Mαwhich connects organismal metabolic rate Bwith organismal mass M, where αis commonly held to be 3 /4. Since simple dimensional analysis suggests α= 2/3, we consider this to be a null hypothesis testable by empirica l studies. We re-analyze data sets for mammals and birds compiled by Heusner, Bennett and Harvey, B artels, Hemmingsen, Brody, and Kleiber, and find little evidence for rejecting α= 2/3 in favor of α= 3/4. For mammals, we find a possible breakdown in scaling for larger masses reflected i n a systematic increase in α. We also review theoretical justifications of α= 3/4 based on dimensional analysis, nutrient-supply networks , and four-dimensional biology. We find that present theories forα= 3/4 require assumptions that render them unconvincing for rejecting the null hypothesis thatα= 2/3. I. INTRODUCTION The “3 /4-law” of metabolism states that organismal basal metabolic rate, B, is related to organismal mass, M, via the power law [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] B=cMα, (1) where αis believed to be 3 /4. The assumption that α= 3/4 is relevant in medicine [7, 8, 9], nutrition [10, 11, 12], and ecology [2, 13, 14, 15], and has been the subject of a series of theoretical debates [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. It has been oft quoted that quarter-power scaling is ubiquitous in biology [2, 22]. Such quarter-law scaling reinforces, and is reinforced by, the notion that basal metabolic rate scales like B∝M3/4. Nevertheless, the reasons, biological or otherwise, for whyα= 3/4 have remained elusive and their elucida- tion stands as an open theoretical problem. A recent surge of interest in the subject, including our own, has been inspired by the elegant attempt of West, Brown and Enquist [22] to link nutrient-supply networks to metabol- ic scaling. This work suggests that a fundamental under- standing of the relationship between basal metabolism and body size is within our grasp and that closer inspec- tion of both theory and data are duly warranted. In this paper we work from the null hypothesis that α= 2/3. In a resting state, heat is predominantly lost through the surface of a body. One then expects, from naive dimensional analysis, that basal metabolism scales as surface area which scales as V2/3where V, volume, is proportional to Mpresuming density is constant. This scaling of surface area with mass has found strong empir- ical support in organismic biology [2, 6, 23, 24]. Such a ∗Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Electro nic address: dodds@segovia.mit.edu; URL: http://segovia.mit.edu/ †Electronic address: dan@segovia.mit.edu ‡Electronic address: jsweitz@segovia.mit.edusurface law of metabolism was first expounded in the nineteenth century [25]. Later observations of devia- tions from α= 2/3 eventually led to its replacement by α≃0.72–0.73 which was then supplanted by the sim- plerα= 3/4 [4, 23, 26]. The widespread agreement thatα= 3/4 is due largely to the formative influence of Kleiber [3, 4, 27] and has been accepted and used as a general rule for decades [21]. We re-examine empirical data available for metabol- ic rates of homoiotherms as well as carefully review both recent and historical theoretical justifications for α= 3/4. Our statistical analysis of data collated by Heusner [28] for 391 species of mammals and by Ben- nett and Harvey [29] for 398 species of birds shows that over considerable, but not all, ranges of body size, the hypothesis α= 2/3 is not rejected by the available data. We also review empirical studies by Bartels [30], Hem- mingsen [23], Brody [26], and Kleiber [3] and find the data, upon re-examination, to be supportive of our inter- pretations. We then examine theoretical attempts to con- nect metabolic rate to mass. These include approaches based on dimensional analysis [1, 18, 31, 32, 33, 34], four-dimensional biology [35, 36], and nutrient-supply networks [22, 37]. We find that none of these theories convincingly show that α= 3/4, rather than α= 2/3, should be expected. However, we do not suggest that the 3 /4-law should be replaced by a 2 /3-law of allometric scaling. We instead argue for a more general approach to the subject, using α= 2/3 as a null hypothesis which should be tested by empiricists when considering α∝negationslash= 2/3, and acknowledge the possibility of deviations from simple scaling. II. MEASURING THE METABOLIC EXPONENT The history of metabolic scaling may be traced through a series of heavily cited empirical papers, some of which are composed of very few data points. In order to bet- Typeset by REVT EX2 −3−2−101234−10123 log10Mlog10B FIG. 1: Metabolic rate, B(watts), as a function of mass, M(kg), for 391 species of mammals. Data taken from Heusner [28]. The straight line represents the best fit for the 357 species with mass less than 10 kg where the α= 0.668±0.019. The upward deviations for species with larger mass (see Table I) may indicate a real biological difference but may also be due to the paucity of data. ter understand the scaling of metabolic rate, we work back in time, calculating αand deviations from uniform scaling for data from Heusner [28], Bennett and Har- vey [29], Bartels [30], Hemmingsen [23], Brody [26], and Kleiber [3]. These papers represent some of the most influential, widely cited, and often controversial papers i n the field. Our re-analysis of the data demonstrates that α= 2/3 should not be rejected for mammals with mass less than approximately 10–35 kg, and a similar analysis of metabolic data for birds demonstrates α= 2/3 should not be rejected for birds in general. We have used the same methods to calculate αand its dependence on Min all cases where data is avail- able. Slopes and intercepts are determined using stan- dard linear regression in log-space taking Mto be the independent variable. The standard correlation coeffi- cient is denoted by rwhile that obtained using the Spear- man rank ordering [38] is written as rs. When data is not available we have attempted to classify the data sets in terms of the original calculations of αand its dependence onM.Mmax N α σ (α) 0.05 0.01 0.01 17 0.454 0.441 [-0.811,1.719] [-1.294,2.202] 0.032 81 0.790 0.093 [0.545,1.034] [0.473,1.106] 0.1 167 0.678 0.038 [0.578,0.778] [0.550,0.806] 1 276 0.662 0.016 [0.620,0.704] [0.608,0.716] 10 357 0.668 0.010 [0.643,0.693] [0.636,0.700] 32 371 0.675 0.009 [0.651,0.698] [0.645,0.705] 100 381 0.698 0.009 [0.675,0.720] [0.668,0.727] 1000 390 0.707 0.008 [0.686,0.728] [0.680,0.734] 3670 391 0.710 0.008 [0.689,0.731] [0.684,0.737] TABLE I: The exponent αmeasured for varying ranges of mass, M < M max(kg), for Heusner’s data [28]. For each mass range, Nis the sample number and the errors, σ(α), are for two standard deviations. The 95% and 99% confidence intervals of αare listed in the last two columns. For small mammals ( M≤0.01 kg, 17 species) a large error is apparent but for increasing Mmax,αcenters around 2 /3. A gradual upwards drift in αis evident for Mmax>10 kg. A. Heusner (1991) Data on basal metabolic rate for 391 mammalian species compiled by Heusner [28] is reproduced in Fig- ure 1. Heusner proposed that species could be separated into two groups, one of animals whose basal metabolism is normally distributed about a regression line and one of statistical outliers. Both groups were found by Heusner to satisfy a 2 /3-law for metabolism. The results of simple regression analysis over various mass ranges for Heusner’s data are shown in Table I. We observe a break in scaling occurring at around M≃10 kg. For those ranges with an upper mass Mmax≤10 kg,α= 2/3 appears to be robust. Note that the data comprises 179 species of the order rodentia ranging over more than three orders of magnitude of mass from 0.007 kg to 26.4 kg. On separating out these samples, we still findα= 0.675±0.025 for the remaining species with M≤10 kg and α= 0.681±0.035 for the rodentia species. Upon addition of mammals with mass exceeding 10 kg, the exponent steadily increases. Given the small number of samples of large mammals, one can only speculate on the reason for this possible deviation. Primarily, it may indicate a real upwards deviation from scaling, with larg- er organisms actually having greater metabolic rates than predicted by α= 2/3 [16, 30, 39]. Larger organisms are reported to scale allometrically in form so such a devia- tion may be a result of changes in body shape and hence surface area [1, 2]. Support for this notion comes from Economos [31] who finds the relationship between mam- malian head-and-body length and mass is better fit by two scaling laws rather than one. He identifies 20 kg as a breakpoint, which is in accord with our findings here, suggesting that geometric scaling holds below this mass while allometric quarter-power scaling holds above. The upper scaling observed by Economos could also be viewed3 as part of a gradual deviation from geometric scaling. The upwards shift of metabolic rates for larger mam- mals could otherwise point to problems of measure- ment (note the corrections for elephants in Brody’s data [26]), an evolutionary advantage related to larger brain sizes [40, 41], or the lack of competition for ecolog- ical niches for large mammals creating a distinction with smaller mammals. B. Bennett and Harvey (1987) Birds show strong support for not rejecting the null hypothesis α= 2/3. Figure 2 shows metabolic data for 398 distinct bird species taken from Bennett and Har- vey [29, 42]. We find here that α= 0.666±0.013 in agreement with Bennett and Harvey’s calculations. Lasiewski and Dawson [43] similarly found that α= 0.668 for a smaller set of data. Attempts to reconcile the 3/4-law with these measurements have centered around the division of birds into passerine (perching birds) and non-passerine species (non-perching birds). Lasiewski and Dawson, for example, found exponents 0 .724 and 0.723 for passerine and non-passerine species respective- ly. Though this is not an arbitrary division (core tem- peratures are thought to differ by 1–2◦C), later work by Kendeigh [44] finds exponents ranging from 0 .668–0 .735 when passerines and non-passerines are grouped accord- ing to different measurement conditions (winter vs. sum- mer, etc.). Similar distinctions between intra- and inter-species scaling have been raised in the study of metabolic scaling for mammals where it has been suggested that α= 2/3 for single species comparisons and α= 3/4 holds across differing species [1, 6, 19]. Bennett and Harvey [29] also found that αdepends on the level of taxonomic detail one is investigating. It remains unclear whether such subdivi- sions reflect relevant biological distinctions or underlyi ng correlations in the choice of taxonomic levels. C. Bartels (1982) Bartels [30] analyzes a set of approximately 85 mam- malian species. Although data is not provided in the paper, a summary of his results can be found in Table II. Bartels finds α= 0.66 (no error estimate is given) for mammals with mass between 2 .4×10−3kg and 3800 kg and concludes that the deviation from the expected 3 /4 scaling is due to the variations in metabolic rates of small animals. This lends further weight to our conjecture that there may be a mass dependence of metabolic rate scal- ing.−3−2−1 012−1012 log10Mlog10B FIG. 2: Metabolic rate, B(watts), as a function of mass, M(kg), for 398 species of birds taken from Bennett and Har- vey [29]. The straight line is the result of a regression anal ysis which gives α= 0.666±0.014. Mmin Mmax N α r 2.4×10−33800≃85 0.66 0.99 2.4×10−30.26≃40 0.42 0.76 0.26 3800 ≃45 0.76 0.99 TABLE II: Exponents measured for varying ranges of mass (kg), Mmin≤M≤Mmaxaccording to Bartels [30]. Here N is the sample number and ris the correlation coefficient. D. Hemmingsen (1960) Hemmingsen’s data set [23] for mammals comprises 15 data points with masses between 0.01 kg and 3500 kg. Most of his data is derived from earlier work by Brody. He states that the data is well modeled by a power law withα= 0.73. To reach this conclusion he does not com- pute the power law of best fit, but rather, the “straight line. . .was chosen corresponding to [ α=]0.73, as estab- lished by Kleiber and also by Brody.” Hemmingsen also finds that a 3 /4-law holds for uni- cellular organisms. Hemmingsen’s work has been cited extensively in support of the claim that the 3 /4-law is a universal biological phenomenon [2, 5, 6, 22]. A careful re-examination of Hemmingsen’s work by Prothero [45] showed that αcan range from approximately 0.60 to 0.75 depending on which unicellular organisms are included in the regression. In addition to these questions about scal-4 MminMmaxN α r s 0.016 1 19 0 .673±0.061 0.91 0.016 10 26 0 .709±0.020 0.96 10 922 9 0 .760±0.085 0.95 0.016 922 35 0 .718±0.022 0.98 TABLE III: Results of regression on Brody’s data [26] over different mass intervals, Mmin< M < M max. An increase in αoccurs for ranges over larger masses. Here, Nis the number of data points and rsis the Spearman correlation coefficient. ing for unicellular life, Patterson [46, 47] has theoretica lly shown for aquatic inverterbrates and algae that the scal- ing exponent can range from 0.31 to 1.00 depending on the mass transfer mechanisms involved. We agree with Prothero’s conclusions that “a three-quarters power rule expressing energy metabolism as a function of size in uni- cellular organisms generally is not at all persuasive” [45] . E. Brody (1945) One of the most influential works on scaling and metabolism is that of Brody [26]. Indeed, the scaling law for metabolism is sometimes cited as the Brody-Kleiber law. Brody compiles a list of metabolic rates for 67 mam- mals. The complete data set yields α= 0.73±0.01. However, on inspection, one makes the surprising obser- vation that 32 data points are artificial in that most of these are calculated using previously determined empiri- cal equations while a few have been corrected to account for variations in animal activity. Using the remaining set of 35 animals we nevertheless find α= 0.72±0.02. It is also important to note that Brody’s research was done before the widespread use of electrocardiography and, as pointed out by Kinnear and Brown [48], Brody’s data may contain overestimations of basal metabolic rate. We re-analyze Brody’s raw, uncorrected data for mam- mals over different mass ranges as shown in Table III. Again, an increase in αis observed for ranges of larger masses. This is consistent with the results from Heusner’s and Bartel’s data which suggest a deviation from perfect scaling with increase in mass. Furthermore, it is evident thatα= 0.72 as calculated by regression on the full data set is misleading. We reiterate that we are not suggesting that there is any robust scaling law for large masses. The results of the regression analysis merely suggest a depen- dence of αon the mass ranges being considered and that a strict power law may not be appropriate. F. Kleiber (1932) In his now-famous paper on metabolic rate, Kleiber analyzed 13 species of mammals with average mass rang- ing from 0.15 to 679 kg [3]. We find the scaling exponentfor the data to be 0 .738±0.016. Again we consider the possibility of a crossover and separate the data into a set of 5 species with M <10 kg and 8 species with M >10 kg. For M <10 kg, α= 0.667±0.043 while for M >10 kg,α= 0.754±0.048. These results are again consistent with our assertion of a mass-dependent α. Nevertheless, it is important to remain mindful of the relative paucity of data in these influential works. III. FLUCTUATIONS ABOUT SCALING The next logical step after measuring the metabolic exponent and systematic deviations thereof is to consider fluctuations about the mean. This is seldom done with power law measurements [49] and researchers concerned with the predictive power of a scaling law for metabolic rate have often pointed to organisms that deviate from predictions as being either problematic or different [6, 26, 28, 30]. We take the view that fluctuations are to be expected and quantified appropriately. We thus generalize the relation B=cMαby consider- ingP(B|M), the conditional probability density of mea- suring a metabolic rate, B, given a mass, M, P(B|M) =M−αf(B/Mα) (2) where the leading factor of M−αis for normalization and/integraltext∞ 0f(x)dx= 1. Our null hypothesis is that fluctuations are Gaussian in logarithmic space, i.e., fis a lognormal distribution. Gaussian fluctuations are typically assumed in statistical inferences made using regression analysis [50]. Demon- strating that fis not inconsistent with a normal distri- bution will therefore allow us to use certain hypothesis tests in the following section. If equation (2) is correct then the sampled data can be rescaled accordingly to reconstruct f, the scaling func- tion. To do so, one must first determine α. We suggest the most appropriate estimate of αcorresponds to the case when the residuals about the best fit power law are uncorrelated with regards to body mass. This is similar to techniques used in the analysis of partial residuals [51] and we make use of it later. We obtain residuals for the range 0 .5≤α≤1.5 where the prefactor cofB=cMα is determined via least squares. The Spearman correla- tion coefficient rsis then determined for the residuals and recorded as a function of α. We then take the value of αfor which rs= 0 as the most likely underlying scaling exponent. We find rs= 0 when α≃0.665 for mammals using Heusner’s data with M≤10 kg and rs≃ −0.42 when α= 3/4. For the entire range of masses in bird data of Bennett and Harvey, rs= 0 when α≃0.671. With these results in hand, we extract ffor mam- mals and birds, the results for mammals being shown in Figure 3. We find the form of fagrees qualitative- ly with a lognormal. In order to quantify the quality of this agreement we employ the Kolmogorov-Smirnov5 range σ p σ∗p∗ mammals M <1 0.153 0.232 0.120 0.307 mammals M <10 0.153 0.093 0.120 0.135 birds all 0.132 0.032 0.115 0.573 TABLE IV: Results from Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for the underlying distributions of fluctuations around pure scali ng for both mammals [28] and birds [29]. The distribution is assumed to be lognormal, i.e., normal in logarithmic coordi - nates. The standard deviations σare calculated directly from the residuals themselves and determine a level of significan ce p. The σ∗correspond to p∗, the maximum p-value possible. test [50], a non-parametric test which gives a signifi- cance probability ( p-value) for whether or not a sam- ple comes from a hypothesized distribution. Not having a hypothesis for the value of the standard deviation, we take two approaches to deal with this problem. Asserting the measured sample standard deviation σto be that of the underlying normal distribution, we calculate the cor- responding significance probability, p. Alternatively, an estimate of σ,σ∗, may be obtained by finding the value ofσwhich maximizes psuch that p(σ∗) =p∗. Results for both calculations are found in Table IV. All p-values are above 0.01, i.e., none show very significant deviations. Additionally, the p-value for only the case of the birds using σestimated from the data falls below 0.05 indicat- ing its departure is significant, but this is balanced by the high p-value found by the maximizing procedure. Thus, we suggest the data supports the simple hypoth- esis of lognormal fluctuations around a scaling law with α≃2/3. IV. HYPOTHESIS TESTS We now construct two types of hypothesis tests to determine whether or not α= 2/3 orα= 3/4 should be rejected by the available data. The first test is the standard method of testing the results of a linear regres- sion against a presumed slope. The second is a natural extension of examining fluctuations about a linear fit as per the previous section. By analyzing the correlations of the residuals from the best fit line we are able to quanti- tatively determine which values of αare compatible with the data. In both tests, we reject an hypothesis when p <0.01. A. Comparison to a fixed α For a given set of Nmeasurements for both mass, Mi, and metabolic rate, Bi, we pose the following hypotheses: H0:α=α′, (3) H1:α∝negationslash=α′. (4)−0.5 0 0.500.511.522.533.54 log10B/M 2/3P( log10B/M 2/3 ) FIG. 3: Fluctuations in metabolic rate for mammals with M≤10 kg taken from Heusner’s data set [28]. The scaling function f(see equation (2)) is fitted with a lognormal distri- bution. Values of Bhave been renormalized as B/M2/3and partitioned into 20 bins. We test the null hypothesis, H0, in the specific cases α′= 2/3 and α′= 3/4 for data from Kleiber [3], Brody [26], Bennett and Harvey [29], and Heusner [28], over various mass ranges. Here, the p-value represents the probability that, given two variables linearly related with slope α′ and subject to Gaussian fluctuations, a data set formed withNsamples would have a measured slope αdiffering at least by |α−α′|fromα′[50]. For a null hypothesis withα=α′, we write the p-value as pα′, e.g., p3/4. For mammals with M≤10 kg, the results of the hypothesis test are contained in Table V. The null hypothesis that α= 3/4 is rejected for both Brody and Heusner’s data and should not be rejected in the case of Kleiber. The alternative null hypothesis that α= 2/3 is not rejected for both Heusner and Kleiber and rejected in the case of Brody. Again, divisions into mass ranges are somewhat arbitrary and are chosen to help demon- strate the mass-dependence of α. For example, for mam- mals with M <1 kg, Brody’s data implies we should not reject the hypothesis that α= 2/3. Table VI details results for mammals with M≥10 kg. In the smaller data sets of Kleiber and Brody the hypothesis that α= 3/4 is not rejected while for the larger data set of Heusner, α= 3/4 is rejected. In all cases the hypothesis that α= 2/3 for large mammals is rejected. Even though Brody and Kleiber’s data sets are consistent with an exponent α >3/4, the relative lack of metabolic measurements on large mammals and the6 N α σ (α)p2/3 p3/4 Kleiber 5 0.667 0.016 0.99 0.088 Brody 26 0.709 0.020 <10−3<10−3 Heusner 357 0.668 0.010 0.91 <10−15 TABLE V: Hypothesis test based on standard comparison between slopes that α= 2/3 and α= 3/4 for mammals with M≤10 kg. Here, αis the measured exponent, σis the stan- dard error, and the p-values p2/3andp3/4for the hypothesis α= 2/3 and α= 3/4 are listed in the last two columns. strong rejection by Heusner’s larger sample prevents us from drawing definitive conclusions about the particular value, if any, of αforM≥10 kg. N α σ (α)p2/3 p3/4 Kleiber 8 0.754 0.021 <10−40.66 Brody 9 0.760 0.038 <10−30.56 Heusner 34 0.877 0.088 <10−12<10−7 TABLE VI: Hypothesis test based on standard comparison between slopes that α= 2/3 and α= 3/4 for mammals with M≥10 kg. See Table V for the definition of all quantities. When all mass ranges are considered for both birds and mammals the hypothesis test (see Table VII) demon- strates that both α= 2/3 and α= 3/4 are rejected based on the empirical data on mammals, while α= 2/3 is not rejected and α= 3/4 is rejected based on the empirical data on birds. In summary, we find that a single exponent may be appropriate for rough estimates but, from a sta- tistical point of view, it appears that no single exponent explains the data on metabolic scaling for mammals. N α σ (α)p2/3 p3/4 Kleiber 13 0.738 0.007 <10−60.11 Brody 35 0.718 0.011 <10−4<10−2 Heusner 391 0.710 0.008 <10−6<10−5 Bennett and Harvey 398 0.664 0.007 0.69 <10−15 TABLE VII: Hypothesis test based on standard comparison between slopes that α= 2/3 and α= 3/4 for birds and mammals over their entire mass range. See Table V for the definition of all quantities. B. Analysis of residuals As per our discussion of fluctuations, a sensitive test of a null hypothesis is to check the rank-correlation coef- ficient of the residuals. In order to test the hypothesis, α=α′, we pose the following hypotheses: H0:rs,α′(zi, Mi) = 0 , (5) H1:rs,α′(zi, Mi)∝negationslash= 0. (6)0.62/30.73/40.8−4−3−2−10 (a) 0.62/30.73/40.8−4−3−2−10 (b) 0.62/30.73/40.8−4−3−2−10 (c) 0.62/30.73/40.8−4−3−2−10 (d) αlog10 p FIG. 4: Test of the null hypothesis H0:rs,α′(zi, Mi) = 0 based on mammalian data from Heusner [28] (see equa- tion (5)). Shown are plots of p(α) for differing mass ranges. In all plots the two dashed horizontal lines correspond to p= 0.05 and p= 0.01. The individual plots correspond to the following ranges: (a) M <3.2 kg, (b) M <10 kg, (c) M <32 kg, (d) all mammals. For all mass ranges considered, p2/3>0.05 and p3/4≪10−4. where the ziare the residuals. The hypothesis H0means that if the residuals for the power law B=cMα′are uncorrelated with Mthenα′could be the underlying exponent. The alternative hypothesis H1means that the residual correlations are significant and the null hypothe- sis should be rejected. The p-values represent the proba- bility that the magnitude of the correlation of the residu- als,|rs,α′(zi, Mi)|, would be at least its value as expected for samples taken from randomly generated numbers. In this case we have tested the hypothesis for a range of exponents, α′= 0.6–0.8, and calculated the signifi- cance levels for both mammal and bird data compiled by Heusner [28] and Bennett and Harvey [29], over differ- ent mass ranges. The results of this hypothesis test for Heusner’s data is contained in Figure 4 and for Bennett and Harvey’s data in Figure 5. Both tests show that the hypothesis α= 3/4 is rejected while that of α= 2/3 is not rejected over all mass ranges considered for both birds and mammals. This does not mean that α= 2/3 is the “real” exponent, but rather that it, unlike α= 3/4, is not incompatible with the data.7 0.62/30.73/40.8−4−3−2−10 (a) 0.62/30.73/40.8−4−3−2−10 (b) 0.62/30.73/40.8−4−3−2−10 (c) 0.62/30.73/40.8−4−3−2−10 (d) αlog10 p FIG. 5: Test of the null hypothesis H0:rs,α′(zi, Mi) = 0 based on bird data from Bennett and Harvey [29] (see Fig- ure 4 for details). Here, the individual plots correspond to the following ranges: (a) M <0.1 kg, (b) M <1 kg, (c) M <10 kg, (d) all birds. As for the mammal data, p2/3>0.05 and p3/4≪10−4for all mass ranges considered. V. THEORIES Thus far we have presented empirical evidence that α is mass dependent and that the null hypothesis α= 2/3 should not be rejected for mammals with M <10 kg and all birds in most available data sets. What then of the- oretical attempts to derive the 3/4-law of metabolism? We show below that many of these arguments, while often elegant in conception and based on simple physics and geometry, contain sufficient flaws to render them unconvincing for the rejection of the simplest theoreti- cal hypothesis, α= 2/3. A. Dimensional analysis Dimensional analysis is a very useful technique when there is only one mass, length, and time scale in a giv- en problem. However in the case of metabolic scaling in biological organisms there has been a long history of the- oretical debates over which scales to use when predicting the scaling of metabolic rate via dimensional analysis. Theories of biological and elastic similarities have been used to explain many structural aspects of organisms such as the length and width of major limbs [31, 32, 33]. Using the principles of elastic similarity, Bonner andMcMahon [1] have tried to explain why quarter-power scaling in body lengths and widths should lead to α= 3/4. Cross-sections of limbs are argued to scale as M3/4 and therefore the power required to move scales in the same way. However, it is not clear why the power output of muscles should be the dominant factor in the scaling of basal metabolic rate. Furthermore, such quarter-power scaling for animal shape is not generally observed [2]. Recent debates have focused on deriving αsolely from dimensional analysis [18, 34]. The problem with all attempts to derive metabolic rate from dimensional anal- ysis is that different constraints lead to different choic- es of contributing scales [18]. Explaining the scaling of metabolic rate is therefore displaced to biological ques- tions of energetic constraints, mass density, physiologic al time, and diffusion constants across surfaces. B. Nutrient Supply Networks Interest in Kleiber’s law resurged with the suggestion by West, Brown and Enquist (WBE) [22] that nutrient- supplying networks might be the ubiquitous limiting fac- tor in organismal form. This remains an appealing and elegant idea and stands as one of the boldest and most significant attempts at discerning the underlying phys- ical mechanisms responsible for quarter-power scaling. Although previous work had addressed the problem of optimal network structure [52, 53, 54, 55], theoretical relations between optimal networks and the scaling of basal metabolic rate had never been considered. The basic assumptions of WBE are i) homoiotherms have evolved to minimize the rate at which they dis- sipate energy; ii) the relevant energy dissipation aris- es from transport through nutrient-supply networks; iii) these networks are space-filling; and iv) all homoiotherms possess capillaries invariant in size. From these four assumptions WBE derive three important conclusions: i) nutrient-supply networks are fractal; ii) these networks contain area-preserving branching; and iii) metabolic rate scales with α= 3/4. However, as we show below and in Appendices A and B, the arguments used are mathematically incorrect and as a consequence none of the above conclusions may be derived from the explicit assumptions. Nevertheless, we find the model appealing and potentially useful in understanding a number of bio- logical issues. Thus we detail below where the errors lie to illuminate the path of future work. For clarity, we use the same notation as WBE. For each level kin the net- work hierarchy one has Nkvessels each with length lkand radius rkwithk= 1 being the aorta and k=Nbeing the capillary level. Related important quantities are nk, γkandβk, the ratios of number, length and radius from levels k−1 tok. Central to the theory is the connection of these network ratios to metabolic rate. WBE find that nk=n,βk=β8 andγk=γare all constants independent of kand that α=−logn logγβ2. (7) This depends in part on an assumption, which we discuss below, that B∝Ncwhere Ncis the number of capillaries. They also conclude that β=n−1/2and γ=n−1/3, (8) which gives α= 3/4 in equation (7). Whereas we show below that these relations do not arise from an opti- mization principle, they do have simple interpretations. The first relation corresponds to networks being area- preserving via Nkr2 k=Nk−1r2 k−1. The second rela- tion follows from a space-filling criterion that Nkl3 k= Nk−1l3 k−1. Whether or not space-filling networks satis- fy these conditions has been discussed by Turcotte et al.[56], who consider the more general case of side- branching networks and arrive at an equivalent statement of equation (7) where the network ratios βandγare to be determined empirically as functions of n. WBE minimize energy dissipation rate by minimizing network impedance using a Lagrange multiplier method. Two types of impedance are considered: Poiseuille flow [57] and, for the case of mammals and birds, a more realistic pulsatile flow [58]. We use the Poiseuille case to demonstrate how frac- tality is not proven by the minimization procedure. The impedance is given by Z=N/summationdisplay k=08µlk πr4 kNk=N/summationdisplay k=0Zk (9) where Zkis the effective impedance of the kth level. As WBE show, the equations are consistent and Zis mini- mized when γk=βk=n−1/3 k. (10) However, the calculations do not require these ratios to be level-independent, and as a consequence, the network need not be fractal. Further details may be found in Appendix A. To see why this is true, we observe that equations (9) and (10) give Zk=γkβ−4 kn−1 kZk−1= 1·Zk−1. (11) Thus, Z, the quantity being minimized, is invariant as long as γkβ−4 kn−1 k= 1 for each k. This shows that in this setting, a network can have nkvarying with kand still be “efficient.” A finding of fractal networks would have provided a derivation of Murray’s empirical law which essentially states that β=n−1/3for the outer reaches of the cardiovascular system [59]. Regardless of these issues, the assumption of Poiseuille flow leads to an approximate metabolic scaling law with α= 1. WBE suggest that modeling pulsatile flow willprovide the explanation for α= 3/4. The impedance now takes the form Z∝N/summationdisplay k=0h1/2 k√ 2πr5/2 kNk, (12) where hkis the thickness of the vessel wall. Howev- er, as explained in Appendix B, the equations given by the Lagrange multiplier technique are inconsistent. For example, the equations give hk=−rk/5 which means negative wall thicknesses for blood vessels when they are by definition positive [58, 60]. If reasonable modifications are made to circumvent this issue, then the equations lead toα= 6/7 rather than α= 3/4. In order to obtain the scaling α= 3/4 one could aban- don the minimization calculation and assume a fractal, space-filling, area-preserving network where B∝Nc. In support of such an assumption, there is good empirical evidence that blood systems are well approximated by fractals [61, 62, 63, 64]. With regards to the assumption thatB∝Nc, direct measurements for capillary density (Nc/M∝Mα−1) are reported by Hoppeler et al. [65] with exponents for the scaling of capillary density across species ranging from −0.21±0.04 to −0.07±0.11 for various regions of muscle. These numbers are in keep- ing with higher exponents for the scaling of NcwithM in the range 0.75–1.00, but whether or not B∝Ncis itself an unproven assumption. It is probably more likely that the number of capillaries scales with the maximum metabolic rate which is thought to scale with an expo- nent closer to unity [66]. At rest not all capillaries diffuse oxygen simultaneously and the limiting factor for basal metabolic rate might not be Nc. A simpler and more recent theory based on the idea of networks has been proposed by Banavar et al. [37]. Here, networks fill D-dimensional hypercubes that have LDuniformly distributed transfer sites. The theory is applied to both three-dimensional organisms and two- dimensional river networks. For organisms, Banavar et al.find blood volume scales as Vb∝L(D+1). Since Banavar et al. further assume that B∝LDand that Vb∝M, they conclude that B∝MD/(D+1). Thus, when D= 3, this gives α= 3/4. However, transfer sites are assumed to be invariant in size and hence LDappears to be proportional to volume Vconsequently M. Thus, both the scalings Vb∝Mand Vb∝M(D+1)/Dare used, creating an apparent incon- sistency. The scaling of the distance between transfer sites and the distinction between Euclidean and non- Euclidean length scales could possibly be clarified to help resolve the dilemma. Note that Vb∝Mis supported empirically [67]. C. Four-dimensional biology Over two decades ago it was suggested by Blum [35] thatα= 3/4 could be understood by appealing to a sur- face law of metabolism in a four-dimensional space. In d9 dimensions, the “area” Aof the hypersurface enclosing a d-dimensional hypervolume scales like A∝Vd−1 d. When d= 4,A∝V3/4, although how this could be reconciled with our three-dimensional world was not explained and the theory has been refuted elsewhere [68]. Recently, an attempt by West et al.[36] has been made to refine and generalize their earlier work on metabolic scaling [22] using an optimization procedure to explain how an effective fourth dimension could yield α= 3/4. The idea put forward is that organisms have evolved to maximize the scaling of the effective surface area, a, across which resources are exchanged. The area aand the biological volume vare shown to satisfy the relation a∝v(2+ǫa)/(3+ǫv), (13) where ǫaandǫvare exponents to be determined by opti- mization. West et al. then introduce the relationship v=alwhere lis a characteristic length of the organism. With the further assumption that v∝M, equation (13) then becomes a∝M(2+ǫa)/(3+ǫa+ǫl), (14) where ǫl=ǫv−ǫa. With the conditions that 0 ≤ǫl, ǫa≤ 1, West et al. find that ǫa= 1 and ǫl= 0. Equation (14) then yields a∝M3/4. Assuming a∝B, this gives α= 3/4. However, this result contradicts the geometric fact that transfer area can maximally scale as volume, i.e., a∝v, which gives α= 1. Indeed, this result is obtained by optimizing equation (13) instead of equation (14). Doing so leads to ǫa= 1 and ǫv= 0, assuming 0 ≤ǫa, ǫv≤1, which gives a∝M, i.e.,α= 1. In order to reconcile this with the results of West et al., we note that the bounds 0≤ǫl, ǫa, ǫv≤1 are overly restrictive. For example, ǫl= −1 corresponds to the relevant length lbeing invariant with respect to Mand, in this case, equation (14) then gives the same scaling as (13), namely, a∝M. Thus, the contradiction is resolved and the optimization procedure is seen to yield α= 1 rather than α= 3/4. VI. DISCUSSION The possibility that there might be a simple law to explain the scaling of metabolic rates still captures the imagination of many seeking to understand what Kleiber called “the fire of life” [4]. It is perhaps for this reason that so many researchers, theorists and empiricists alike, have struggled to deduce explanations for the deviations from the simplest expectation that α= 2/3. The shift from α= 2/3 toα= 3/4 began with the ear- ly work by Kleiber and Brody who found α≃0.72–0.73 in limited data sets [3, 26]. Afterwards it was work by Hemmingsen [23] and a general consensus among practi- tioners [21] that simple fractions would be a more con- venient standard that led to the widespread acceptanceofα= 3/4. Subsequently, α= 3/4 has often been tak- en as fact despite the absence of a comprehensive theo- ry and contradictory evidence from large literature sur- veys. Most prominent among these surveys are those by Bartels [30], Bennett and Harvey [29], and Heusner [28], which suggest that αdepends on body size and taxonom- ic level. We have re-analyzed some of the most influential empirical data sets in the study of metabolic rate scal- ing. We have constructed a set of hypothesis tests which show that in the data sets of Kleiber, Brody, Bennett and Harvey, and Heusner, pure 3 /4-law scaling is not present. For both mammals with M≤10 kg and all birds we are unable to reject the null hypothesis α= 2/3. For mammals with M≥10 kg, systematic deviations from α= 2/3 appear to be present in all of the data sets, the roots of which might simply be a consequence of a change in body shape for large mammals or might point to a greater evolutionary advantage of large mammals. We have also reviewed historic and recent attempts to justify α= 3/4 theoretically. Many of the early efforts to explain the scaling of metabolic rates via dimension- al analysis and other crude scaling techniques have been dismissed in the past. Although recent attempts to link metabolic rates to network structure are noteworthy they do not prove the stated conclusions. Nonetheless, we believe that research exploring the role of geometric form and the dynamics of growth in constraining the behavior of networks might lead to important progress in organis- mal biology. Stated simply, after a systematic review of the avail- able empirical data and theoretical arguments, we find no compelling evidence of a simple scaling law for metabolic rate, and if it were to exist, we also find no compelling evidence that the exponent should be α= 3/4. Acknowledgements We would like to offer our sincere thanks to A. Heusner for helpful discussions and sharing data with us. We would also like to thank M. Brenner, A. Brockwell, L. Demetrius, H. Fraser, H. Hartman, K. Schmidt- Nielsen, and N. Schorghofer for their comments. PSD and DHR thank G. West for hosting visits to Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Santa Fe Institute, thereby aiding our introduction to the subject. We would also like to thank M. Kardar, A. Rinaldo, and the other par- ticipants in the 1999 MIT seminar on natural networks for their insightful discussions. This work was support- ed in part by NSF grant EAR-9706220 and DOE grant DEF602-99ER15004. JSW is grateful for support from an NDSEG fellowship.10 APPENDIX A: NETWORK OPTIMIZATION CALCULATION FOR POISEUILLE FLOW We follow the conventions of WBE and consider the case of Poiseuille flow as a means to derive Murray’s law and the fractal nature of nutrient supply networks. The impedance of the network is Z=N/summationdisplay k=08µlk πr4 kNk. (A1) Minimizing the network’s impedance with the Lagrange constraints of fixed mass and blood volume along with the assumption of a space filling network leads to the auxiliary function, Fm(rk, lk, Nk, M) =N/summationdisplay k=08µlk πr4 kNk +λN/summationdisplay k=0πr2 klkNk+N/summationdisplay k=0λkNkl3 k+λMM. (A2) Taking partial derivatives with respect to lj,rjandNj we respectively have ∂Fm ∂lj=8µ πr4 jNj+λπr2 jNj+ 3λjNjl2 j= 0,(A3) ∂Fm ∂rj=−4·8µlj πr5 jNj+λ2πrjljNj= 0, (A4) and ∂Fm ∂Nj=−1·8µlj πr4 jN2 j+λπr2 jlj+λjl3 j= 0.(A5) Considering first equation (A4), we obtain λ=16µ π2r6 jN2 j. (A6) Since this holds for all jthen 1 =16µ π2r6 j−1N2 j−1π2r6 jN2 j 16µ=β6 jn2 j, (A7) where βj=rj/rj−1andnj=Nj/Nj−1which demon- strates that βj=n−1/3 j, (A8) giving us Murray’s law [59]. After rearranging equation (A3) we obtain λj=−8µ 3πr4 jN2 jl2 j−λπr2 j 3l2 j =−8µ 3πr4 jN2 jl2 j−16µ 3πr4 jN2 jl2 j =−8µ πr4 jN2 jl2 j, (A9)where we have used the form for λobtained in equa- tion (A6). Note that derivatives with respect to Nj, equation (A5), yield the same expression for λjgiven above: λj=−−1·8µ πr4 jN2 jl2 j−λπr2 j l2 j =8µ πr4 jN2 jl2 j−16µ πr4 jN2 jl2 j =−8µ πr4 jN2 jl2 j(A10) The three equations (A3), (A4) and (A5) are therefore consistent but redundant. The redundancy can be seen to lie in the fact that the auxiliary function Fmin equa- tion (A2) can be written in terms of only two variables for each level k:ξk=Nkl3 kandζk=rk/lk. Equation (A2) thus becomes Fm(ξk, ζk, M) =N/summationdisplay k=08µ πζ4 kξk +λN/summationdisplay k=0πζ2 kξk+N/summationdisplay k=0λkξk+λMM. (A11) Thus one is only able to obtain information such as ratios of variables rather than exact values for network param- eters. The scaling of length ratios are explicitly determined by WBE’s space-filling assumption Nkl3 k=C. (A12) Thus, even without implementing the minimization pro- cedure the space-filling assumption implies γk=n−1/3 k, (A13) where γk=lk/lk−1is the length ratio. Finally, the equa- tions (A8), (A9) (or (A10)) and (A13) combine to give λk λk−1=r4 k−1N2 k−1l2 k−1 r4 kN2 kl2 k =β−4 kn−2 kγ−2 k = (n−1/3 k)−4n−2 k(n−1/3 k)−2= 1 (A14) so we have λk=λ0for all k. The calculations are seen to be consistent and yield Murray’s law [59]. Variations with respect to Mare more subtle since N=N(M) and provide higher order correc- tions. However, one of WBE’s crucial results, nk=n, i.e. that the network is fractal, has not been reproduced. One way to see this is to consider the impedance as impedances in series: Z=N/summationdisplay k=0Zkwhere Zk=8µlk πr4 kNk. (A15)11 Using equations (A8) and (A13) we have that Zk Zk−1=r4 k−1Nk−1lk r4 kNklk−1=γk β4 knk=n−1/3 k (n−1/3 k)4nk= 1. (A16) In other words, the same impedance appears at each lev- el. So Z= (N+ 1)ZN≃NZN=N8µlc πr4cNc∝N Nc,(A17) sincercandlcare assumed to be independent of mass and Ncis the number of capillaries. This is true regardless of whether or not the structure is fractal. The network has to possess branching ratios that collectively maintain the same impedance from level to level (i.e., γk/β4 knk= 1 as per equation (A16)) but there is no requirement that the individual ratios γk,βkandnkbe independent of level. Moreover, without the result that the network is fractal, this minimization procedure no longer yields the power law scaling of metabolic rate (see equation (7)). APPENDIX B: NETWORK OPTIMIZATION CALCULATION FOR PULSATILE FLOW In the case of Poiseuille flow, WBE find a network structure where area preservation is not satisfied ( βk∝negationslash= n−1/2 k) and, effectively, α= 1 (if nk=nis assumed). The intended fix is to properly treat pulsatile flow of mammalian blood circulation systems. By doing so we should obtain βk=n−1/2 kandγk=n−1/3 k. Together with the assumption nk=n, this leads to the conclusion, Nc∝M3/4, and assuming B∝Nc, it would imply a 3 /4- law of metabolic scaling. The calculation relies on the results of Womersley’s work on pulsatile flow [58, 60]. Womersley’s calculations lead to a modification of the Poiseuille impedance. For large tubes one has Z≃ρc0 πr2. (B1) where co= (Eh/2ρr)1/2is the Korteweg-Moens velocity, Eis Young’s modulus, his the thickness of the vessel wall, ρis blood density and ris, as before, the vessel radius [58, 60]. This impedance appears to be per unit length but it has the correct dimensions showing that for a flow with pulsatile forcing in an elastic tube, the impedance is independent of the tube length. Womersley’s impedance suggests a new auxiliary func- tion: Fw(rk, hk, lk, Nk, M) =N/summationdisplay k=0(Ehkρ)1/2 √ 2πr5/2 kNk +λN/summationdisplay k=0π(rk+hk)2lkNk+N/summationdisplay k=0λkNkl3 k+λMM.(B2)Note that the extra variable of wall thickness, hk, has been included in the second term to make it a measure of the total volume taken up by the blood system. The variable hkmust appear in the constraints if the mini- mization is to make any sense and the blood volume is the only reasonable choice—the blood volume constraint becomes a network volume constraint. On considering variations of equation (B2) with respect to rjandhjwe obtain ∂Fw ∂rj=−5 2(Ehjρ)1/2 √ 2πr7/2 jNj+λ2π(rj+hj)ljNj= 0,(B3) and ∂Fw ∂hj=1 2(Eρ)1/2 √ 2πh1/2 jr5/2 jNj+λ2π(rj+hj)ljNj= 0. (B4) Since the second term of these equations are the same we then have an equality between the first terms which simplifies to show that hj=−1 5rj. (B5) This suggests that rkis the distance to the outer wall of blood vessels. We are then measuring the blood volume as before and we should have had ( rk−hk) instead of (rk+hk) in the auxiliary function. However it is apparent from Womersley’s work [58, 60] that ris the radius as measured from the center to the inner wall of a blood vessel rather than the outer wall. There appears to be no reasonable and simple way of including the hkinto a constraint function and we have an ill-posed problem. Nevertheless, we may proceed with the calculation by adding an extra assumption that hk=a0rkwhere a0>0. The modified version of equation (B3) now gives λas λ=(a0Eρ)1/2 √ 2π2(1 +a0)2r4 jN2 jlj. (B6) Since the right hand side is independent of jwe must therefore have β4 jn2 jγj= 1, (B7) and given the space-filling constraint, γj=n−1/3 j, we obtain 1 =β4 jn2 jn−1/3 j=β4 jn5/3 j, (B8) which gives a relationship between the radius and number ratios that is not area-preserving: βj=n−5/12 j. (B9) A further complication here is that the equations obtained by setting ∂Fw/∂lj= 0 and ∂Fw/∂N j= 0 are not consistent.12 As in the case of Poiseuille flow, nk=nis not deriv- able. Assuming that nk=nand using equation (7) we find that the metabolic exponent should be α=−lnn lnγβ2=−lnn lnn−1/3n−10/12= 6/7,(B10) as opposed to the stated 3 /4. Note that if we had found βk=n1/2 kthen the 3 /4 law would have been deduced (again, assuming nk= n). Another observation here is that if the Womersleyimpedance is taken together with βk=n−1/2 kthen we find that the minimum total impedance is obtained irre- spective of the ratios nkbeing equal or not. So, in the cas- es of Poiseuille and pulsatile flow a fractal network is not necessary for energy dissipation to be minimized. Addi- tionally, in the case of a pulsatile flow network, α= 3/4 cannot be derived from the optimization problem as stat- ed. It may instead be derived by assuming an area pre- serving, space-filling, fractal network where B∝Nc. [1] J. T. Bonner and T. A. McMahon. On Size and Life . Scientific American Library, New York, 1983. [2] W. A. Calder III. Size, Function and Life History . Dover, New York, 1996. [3] M. Kleiber. Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia , 6:315– 353, 1932. [4] M. Kleiber. The Fire of Life. An Introduction to Animal Energetics . Wiley, New York, 1961. [5] R. Peters. The Ecological Implications of Body Size . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983. [6] K. Schmidt-Nielsen. Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge University Press, UK, 1984. [7] B. J. Anderson, A. D. McKee, and N. H. G. Holford. Size, myths, and the clinical pharmacokinetics of analgesia in paediatric patients. Clinical Pharmacokinetics , 33:313– 27, 1997. [8] J. Mordenti. Man versus beast: pharmacokinetic scal- ing in mammals. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences , 75:1028–1040, 1986. [9] I. Mahmood. Allometric issues in drug development. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences , 88:1101–6, 1999. [10] I. Burger and J. Johnson. Dogs large and small: the allometry of energy requirements within a single species. J. Nutr. , 121(11 (Suppl)):S18–21, 1991. [11] J. Cunningham. A reanalysis of the factors influenc- ing basal metabolic rate in normal adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 33:2372–2374, 1980. [12] R. Pike and M. Brown. Nutrition an integrated approach . John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984. [13] J. Damuth. Population density and body size in mam- malas. Nature , 290:699–700, April 1981. [14] S. L. Lindstedt, B. J. Miller, and S. W. Buskirk. Home range, time, and body size in mammals. Ecology , 67(2):413–418, 1986. [15] C. Carbone, G. Mace, C. Roberts, and D. Macdonald. Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestial carnivores . Nature , 402:286–8, 1999. [16] A. E. Economos. Elastic and/or geometric similarity in mammalian design. J. Theor. Biol. , 103:167–172, 1983. [17] H. Feldman. The 3/4 mass exponent for energy metabolism is not a statistical artifact. Respir. Physi- ol., 52:149–163, 1983. [18] H. A. Feldman. On the allometric mass exponent, when it exists. J. Theor. Biol. , 172:187–197, 1995. [19] A. Heusner. Energy metabolism and body size. I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber a statistical artifact? Respir. Physiol. , 48:1–12, 1982. [20] J. Prothero. Scaling of standard energy-metabolism inmammals: I. Neglect of circadian-rhythms. J. Theor. Biol., 106(1):1–8, 1984. [21] K. L. Blaxter, editor. Energy Metabolism; Proceedings of the 3rd symposium held at Troon, Scotland, May 1964 . Academic Press, New York, 1965. [22] G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science , 276:122–126, April 1997. [23] A. Hemmingsen. Energy metabolism as related to body size and respiratory surfaces, and its evolution. Rep. Steno Mem. Hosp. , 9:1–110, 1960. [24] A. Heusner. What does the power function reveal about structure and function in animals of different size? Ann. Rev. Phsyiol. , 49:121–133, 1987. [25] M. Rubner. Ueber den einfluss der k¨ orpergr¨ osse auf sto f- fund kraftwechsel. Z. Biol. , 19:535–562, 1883. [26] S. Brody. Bioenergetics and Growth . Reinhold, New York, 1945. [27] Kleiber’s motivation in part was to make calculations l ess cumbersome with a slide rule (see p. 59 in [6]). [28] A. A. Heusner. Size and power in mammals. J. Exp. Biol., 160:25–54, 1991. [29] P. Bennett and P. Harvey. Active and resting metabolism in birds—allometry, phylogeny and ecology. J. Zool. , 213:327–363, 1987. [30] H. Bartels. Metabolic rate of mammals equals the 0.75 power of their body weight. Exp. Biol. and Medicine , 7:1–11, 1982. [31] A. C. Economos. On the origin of biological similarity. J. Theor. Biol. , 94:25–60, 1982. [32] B. Gunther. Theories of biological similarities—30 ye ars of trial and error. Arch. Biol. Med. Exp. , 18(3–4):197– 224, 1985. [33] B. Gunther and E. Morgado. Dimensional analysis and theory of biological similarity. Exp. Biol. Med. , 7:12–20, 1982. [34] A. Heusner. Energy metabolism and body size. II. Dimensional analysis and energetic non-similarity. Respir. Physiol. , 48:13–25, 1982. [35] J. J. Blum. On the geometry of four-dimensions and the relationship between metabolism and body mass. J. Theor. Biol. , 64:599–601, 1977. [36] G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist. The fourth dimension of life; fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. Nature , 284:1677–1679, 1999. [37] J. R. Banavar, A. Maritan, and A. Rinaldo. Size and form in efficient transportation networks. Nature , 399:130– 132, May 1999.13 [38] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes in C . Cambridge University Press, second edition, 1992. [39] A. Heusner. Body mass, maintenance and basal metabolism in dogs. J. Nutr. , 121(11 Suppl):S8–17, Nov. 1991. [40] W. Jungers, editor. Size and scaling in primate biology . Advances in Primatology. Plenum Press, New York, 1985. [41] J. M. Allman. Evolving brains . Scientific American Library, New York, 1999. [42] Following Bennett and Harvey [29], we take one sample for each species of bird selecting those with lowest mass- specific resting metabolic rate. Note that we also include organisms that Bennett and Harvey state were measured during their active cycle whereas Bennett and Harvey do not. The use of other selection criteria does not greatly affect the results we present here. [43] R. C. Lasiewski and W. R. Dawson. A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds. Condor , 69:13–23, 1967. [44] S. C. Kendeigh, V. R. Dol’nik, and V. M. Gavrilov. Avian energetics. In J. Pinowski and S. Kendeigh, editors, Granivorous birds in ecosystems , pages 129–204, 363–73, Cambridge, 1977. Cambridge University Press. [45] J. Prothero. Scaling of energy-metabolism in unicellu lar organisms—a reanalysis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A- Physiol. , 83(2):243–248, 1986. [46] M. Patterson. A mass-transfer explanation of metaboli c scaling relations in some aquatic invertebrates and algae. Science , 255(5050):1421–1423, 1992. [47] M. Patterson. Correction. Science , 256(5058):722–722, 1992. [48] J. Kinnear and G. Brown. Minimum heart rates of mar- supials. Nature , 215:1501, 1967. [49] P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman. Geometry of river net- works I: Scaling, fluctuations, and deviations. Submitted to Phys. Rev. E, 2000. [50] M. H. DeGroot. Probability and Statistics . Addison- Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975. [51] T. Hastie and R. Tibshirani. Generalized additive mod- els: Some applications. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. , 82:371–86, 1987. [52] D. Cohn. Optimal systems I. The vascular system. Bull. Math. Biophys. , 16:59–74, 1954. [53] D. Cohn. Optimal systems II. The vascular system. Bull. Math. Biophys. , 17:219–227, 1955.[54] N. Rashevsky. General mathematical principles in biol - ogy. In N. Raschevsky, editor, Physicomathematical Aspects of Biology , Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”; course 16, pages 493– 524, New York, 1962. Academic Press. [55] M. LaBarbera. Principles of design of fluid transport systems in zoology. Science , 249:992–1000, 1990. [56] D. L. Turcotte, J. D. Pelletier, and W. I. Newman. Net- works with side branching in biology. J. Theor. Biol. , 193:577–592, 1998. [57] H. Lamb. Hydrodynamics . Dover, New York, 6th edition, 1945. [58] J. R. Womersley. Method for the calculation of velocity , rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J. Physiol. , 127:553–563, 1955. [59] C. D. Murray. The physiological principle of minimum work. I. The vascular system and the cost of blood vol- ume.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A , 12:207–214, 1926. [60] J. R. Womersley. Oscillatory motion of a viscous liquid in a thin-walled elastic tube—I: The linear approximation for long waves. Phil. Mag. , 46(373):199–221, 1955. [61] Y.-C. B. Fung. Biomechanics: motion, flow, stress, and growth . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990. [62] G. S. Kassab, C. A. Rider, T. N. J., and Y. B. Fung. Mor- phometry of pig coronary arterial trees. Am. J. Physiol. , 265:H350–H365, 1993. [63] K. Kassab, G. S. Imoto, F. C. White, C. A. Rider, Y.- C. B. Fung, and C. M. Bloor. Coronary arterial tree remodeling in right ventricular hypertropy. Am. J. Phys- iol., 265:H366–H375, 1993. [64] M. Zamir, S. M. Wrigley, and B. L. Langille. Arterial bifurcations in the cardiovascular system of a rat. J. Gen. Physiol. , 81:325–335, 1983. [65] H. Hoppeler, O. Mathieu, E. Weibel, R. Krauer, S. Lind- stedt, and C. Taylor. Design of mammalian respirato- ry system VIII. Capillaries in skeletal muscles. Respir. Physiol. , 44:129–150, 1981. [66] C. M. Bishop. The maximum oxygen consumption and aerobic scope of birds and mammals: getting to the heart of the matter. Proc. Roy. Lond. B. , 266:2275–81, 1999. [67] W. R. Stahl. Scaling of respiratory variables in mammal s. Journal of Applied Physiology , 22:453–460, 1967. [68] J. Speakman. On Blum’s four-dimensional geometric explanation for the 0.75 exponent in metabolic allome- try.J. Theor. Biol. , 144(1):139–141, 1990.

arXiv:physics/0007097v1 [physics.optics] 30 Jul 2000Slow light Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princet on, NJ 08544 (April 3, 1999) 1 Problem Consider a classical model of matter in which spectral lines are associated with oscillators. In particular, consider a gas with two closely spaced spectr al lines, ω1,2=ω0±∆, where ∆≪ω0. Each line has oscillator strength 1 /Z, where Zis the atomic number of a gas atom, and each has the same damping constant (and spectral width) γ. For simplicity, you may suppose that ∆ = γ. Ordinarily, the gas would exhibit strong absorption of ligh t in the vicinity of the spectral lines. But suppose that a laser of frequency ω2“pumps” the second oscillator into an inverted population. Classically, this is described by assigning a n egative damping constant to this oscillator: γ2=−γ. Deduce an expression for the group velocity of a pulse of ligh t centered on frequency ω0 in this medium. Show also that frequencies very near ω0propagate without attenuation. In a recent experiment [1], the group velocity of light was re duced to 38 mph (17 m/s) by this technique in a sodium vapor of density N= 5×1012atoms/cm3using a pair of lines for which 2∆ ≈107/s. 2 Solution In a medium of index of refraction n(ω), the dispersion relation can be written k=ωn c, (1) where kis the wave number and cis the speed of light. The group velocity is then given by vg=dω dk=1 dk/dω=c n+ωdn dω. (2) We next recall the classical oscillator model for the index o f refraction. The index nis the square root of the dielectric constant ǫ, which is in turn related to the atomic polarizability αaccording to (in Gaussian units) D=ǫE=E+ 4πP=E(1 + 4 πNα), (3) where Dis the the electric displacement, Eis the electric field, Pis the polarization density, andNis the atomic number density. Then, n=√ǫ≈1 + 2πNα, (4) for a dilute gas with index near 1. 1The polarizability αis obtained from the dipole moment p=ex=αEinduced by electric fieldE. In the case of a single spectral line of frequency ω0, we say that the charge eis bound to the (fixed) nucleus by a spring of constant k=mω2 0, and the motion is subject to damping −mγ˙x. The equation of motion in the presence of a wave of frequency ωis ¨x+γ˙x+ω2 0x=eE m=eE0 meiωt. (5) Hence, x=eE m1 ω2 0−ω2−iγω=eE mω2 0−ω2+iγω (ω2 0−ω2)2+γ2ω2, (6) and so the polarizability is α=e2 mω2 0−ω2+iγω (ω2 0−ω2)2+γ2ω2. (7) In the present problem, we have two spectral lines, ω1,2=ω0±γ, both of oscillator strength 1 /Z, but the population of line 2 is inverted so that γ2=−γ1=−γ. In this case, the polarizability is given by α=1 Ze2 m(ω0−γ)2−ω2+iγω ((ω0−γ)2−ω2)2+γ2ω2+1 Ze2 m(ω0+γ)2−ω2−iγω ((ω0+γ)2−ω2)2+γ2ω2 ≈1 Ze2 mω2 0−2γω0−ω2+iγω (ω2 0−2γω0−ω2)2+γ2ω2+1 Ze2 mω2 0+ 2γω0−ω2−iγω (ω2 0+ 2γω0−ω2)2+γ2ω2, (8) where the approximation is obtained by the neglect of terms i nγ2compared to those in γω0. The index of refraction (4) corresponding to polarizabilit y (8) is shown in Fig. 1. -0.100.1 frequencyRe(n□-□1) Im(n) Figure 1: The real and imaginary parts of the index of refract ion corre- sponding to the polarizibility (4) in a medium with one of a pa ir of spectral lines pumped so as to produce a large rate of change of the inde x with nearby frequency. We now consider the issue of attenuation of a pulse of frequen cyω. Since k=ωn/c≈ ω(1+2πNα)/c, the spatial dependence eikzof a pulse propagating in the zdirection includes 2attenuation if the imaginary part of the index nis positive. However, the population inversion described by γ2=−γ1leads to Im[α(ω0)] = 0. Hence, there is no attenuation of a probe pulse at frequency ω0 In the present model, the pulse is attenuated at frequencies less than ω0, but grows (lases) at frequencies greater than ω0. In the experiment of Hau et al. [1], lasing did not occur because line 2 actually corresponded to a transition betwee n the upper level of line 1 and a 3rd, excited level. (In a sense, the quantum mechanical leve l structure with one high and two low energy levels is the inverse of that assumed in the classi cal model here, i.e., one low and two high levels.) Therefore, pumping at frequency ω2did not produce an inverted population that could lead to lasing; but it did lead to an effective sign r eversal of the damping constant γ2for a narrow range of frequencies near ω0. This classical argument presents a simplified view of the quantum process called electormagnetically ind uced transparency [2]. To obtain the group velocity at frequency ω0, we need the derivative dRe(n) dω/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ω0= 2πNdRe(α) dω/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ω0=24πNe2 25Zmγ2ω0. (9) Since α(ω0) = 0, we have n(ω0) = 1, and the phase velocity at ω0is exactly c. The group velocity (2) is vg=c 1 +24πNe2 25Zmγ2≈25Zγ2 24πNe2 mc2c2c≈Zγ2 πNr 0c, (10) where r0=e2/mc2≈3×10−13cm is the classical electron radius. The group velocity is lower in a denser medium. In the experiment of Hau et al., the medium was sodium vapor ( Z= 11), cooled to less than a µK to increase the density. An additional increase in density by a factor of 5 was obtained when the vapor formed a Bose condensate. Plugg ing in the experimental parameters, N= 5×1012/cm3andγ= 5×106/s, we find vg≈11·(5×106)2 3·5×1012·3×10−13·3×1010≈2000 cm/s , (11) compared to the measured value of 1700 cm/s. 3 References [1] L.V. Hau et al.,Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas, Nature 397, 594-598 (1999). [2] S.E. Harris, Electromagnetically Induced Transparency , Physics Today 50(7), 36-42 (1997). 3

arXiv:physics/0007099v1 [physics.geo-ph] 31 Jul 2000Formation of Structure in Snowfields: Penitentes, Suncups, and Dirt Cones M. D. Betterton Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 0 2138 Abstract Penitentes and suncups are structures formed as snow melts, typically high in the mountains. When the snow is dirty, dirt cones and o ther structures can form instead. Building on previous field obse rvations and experiments, this work presents a theory of ablation mor phologies, and the role of surface dirt in determining the structures fo rmed. The glaciological literature indicates that sunlight, heatin g from air, and dirt all play a role in the formation of structure on an ablating sn ow surface. The present work formulates a mathematical model for the for mation of ablation morphologies as a function of measurable parame ters. The dependence of ablation morphologies on weather conditions and initial dirt thickness are studied, focusing on the initial growth o f perturbations away from a flat surface. We derive a single-parameter expres sion for the melting rate as a function of dirt thickness, which agree s well with a set of measurements by Driedger. An interesting result is th e prediction of a dirt-induced travelling instability for a range of para meters. 1Penitentes are structures of snow or ice [1], which commonly form during the summer on glaciers or snow fields at high altitudes (in the And es and Himalaya). A penitente is a column of snow, wider at the base and narrowing to a point at the tip. The name “penitente” is a Spanish word meaning “penitent one ,” and arose because a field of penitentes resembles a procession of monks in white robes. Penitentes range from one to six meters high with the spacing between columns c omparable to their height (Figure 1). Smaller structures, known as suncups or a blation hollows, can be found in lower mountains like the Rockies and the Alps (Fig ure 2). Suncups are smaller, two cm to half a meter in size. FIG. 1. Photographs of penitentes, from Post and LaChapelle [1], p. 72. Left, penitentes on Cerro Negro, Chile. Right, field of penitentes, north slop e of Cerro Marmolejo Norte, Chile. Note the ice-axe, approximately 80 cm high. In the pic ture on the left, the snow in the hollows has completely melted, exposing the soil undern eath. This is a frequent, though not universal, feature of penitentes [2]. The first written record of penitentes comes from Charles Dar win, who observed them during his travels in the mountains of Chile [3]. “Bold conical hills of red granite rose on each hand; in the va lleys there were several broad fields of perpetual snow. These frozen mas ses, during the process of thawing, had in some parts been converted into pinnacles or columns, which, as they were high and close together, made it difficult for the cargo mules to pass. On one of these columns of ice, a fr ozen horse was sticking as on a pedestal, but with its hind legs straight up in the air. The animal, I suppose, must have fallen with its head dow nward into a hole, when the snow was continuous, and afterwards the surr ounding parts must have been removed by the thaw.” An extensive literature of observations and field experimen ts has documented these ablation morphologies (see [2] for many references). Ablation in this context 2means removal of snow by melting or sublimation. This contra sts with other pro- cesses like wind, avalanches, and rain. There is a consensus about the causes of ablation morphologies, although some contradictory claim s do exist in the literature. For penitentes, bright sunlight and cold, dry weather are ap parently required [2], while ablation hollows can be formed in three distinct ways, with solar illumination important in some settings. For other locations, uniform he ating from the air appears to be the key effect. The effect of this “sensible” heat transfe r (so called because it is easily felt with the senses) to the snow depends on whether the snow is clean or dirty. Since many readers are likely to be unfamiliar with th e glaciological literature, I give a brief review here. The observational evidence for sunlight-driven formation of penitentes is abun- dant. In early work, Matthes [4] argued that a variety of abla tion forms, from sun cups a few inches in size to penitentes many feet deep, are for med by the sun. As he pointed out, the formation of the largest penitentes requ ires strong and prolonged solar radiation—the primary reason why penitentes develop only in regions with dry summer climates. Matthes also observed that penitentes til t toward the elevation of the midday sun (an observation confirmed by others [1,5–8]). Such tilting is strong evidence that the sun has an important role in the developmen t of structure, because the direction of incident radiation provides the symmetry a xis in the problem. In later work, Lliboutry [8] observed that incipient penitent es begin as east-west rows. Perhaps most important, if the weather is not dominated by di rect sunlight—if the weather is cloudy [4] or very windy [4,8]—penitentes are obs erved to decay. In the 1930s Troll performed an experiment trying to create penite ntes [7]. The exact state- ment (reported by Lliboutry [8]) is “Troll was able to reprod uce penitents in Germany by shining an electric bulb on fresh snow during a cold, dry ni ght.” This supports the sunlight mechanism, although to my knowledge no controlled laboratory experiments have investigated light-driven structure formation. To understand qualitatively how sunlight can cause structu re formation, note that when light is reflected off the snow, the base of a depressi on receives more reflected light than the neighboring peaks. This drives an in stability of the surface and the amplitude of a perturbation grows; quantifying this argument will be a main goal of this paper. The effects of reflections are considered i mporant by several observers [4,8,9]. This may not be the only required effect. A t the high altitudes where penitentes commonly form, the air is so cold and dry tha t sublimation occurs instead of melting [10], consistent with the observations t hat the snow in penitentes is quite dry [4,8]. Lliboutry [8] claims that the snow in the hol lows between penitentes is soft and wet, and that temperature variations of 5-10◦C exist between the peaks and the troughs. This was interpreted to indicate snow sublimat ing from the peaks and melting near the troughs—an effect which accelerates the gro wth of structure, since 7 times more heat is required to sublimate a volume of snow than to melt it. Lliboutry believes this effect to be crucial for the development of the l argest structures, and 3claims that penitentes only appear at altitudes high enough that sublimation becomes important. But other researches report results in disagree ment with this [4,6]. A different set of observations and experiments have led to a v ery different claim: that solar illumination destroys ablation morphologies, w hile windy weather promotes their growth. Leighly [11] argued that heat from air (delive red by wind) leads to the formation of ablation polygons (cf. Figure 3). Others state [12–14] that structures do not grow in the presence of direct sunlight. Ashwell and Ha nnell claim [15] that when the incident solar power is larger than the incident pow er from heating by wind the hollows decay. Detailed observations, along with wind- tunnel experiments, have been made by Takahashi and collaborators [16,17]; they conc lude that structures grow most rapidly when the air temperature and wind speed are high est [18]. When the weather is warm and cloudy, wind mixes the air so heat is deliv ered at a steady rate to the surface; the higher the temperature and wind speed, th e faster the heating. Rhodes, Armstrong, and Warren [2] suggested a resolution to this apparent contra- diction, which I now summarize. In their view, dirt on the sno w surface is the hidden variable distinguishing the two cases. Sunlight drives for mation of penitentes in clean snow because reflection into hollows makes depressions in th e snow surface grow. Any source of ablation which transfers heat uniformly to the snow surface therefore disrupts formation of structure. However, sunlight acts di fferently on a dirty snow surface. Dirt decreases the amount of reflected light, preve nting the concentration of sunlight in the hollows. This agrees with the Rhodes et. al. observations of suncups on Mount Olympus. The researchers noticed that when the snow surface was covered by a layer of ash from the eruption of Mount Saint Helens, sunc ups did not form. They scraped away the ash from one patch of snow and observed t he formation of sun cups on this clean snow surface. FIG. 2. Photographs of suncups, from Post and LaChapelle [1] . Left, suncups on the Taku Glacier, Coast Mountains, Southeast Alaska, p. 70. Rig ht, deep suncups in Disap- pointment Cleaver, Mount Rainier, p. 71. 4How does dirt affect snow ablation? If the dirt thickness cove ring the snow is sufficiently thick, the dirt forms an insulating layer which s lows down the ablation rate of the snow [20]. Thus dirt can have different effects, dep ending on thickness. A thin layer of dirt causes faster ablation because reflectio n is inhibited. However, sufficiently thick dirt slows ablation. A large amount of work has looked at how debris-covered ice or snow melts [10,15,21]; one typically finds a peak in the ablation rate for dirt thickness around 0.5–5 cm. One nice experiment was done by Driedger [22], who measured ablation rate as a function of ash thickne ss on the South Cascade Glacier (primarily due to melting). The typical grain sizes of the ash were 0.25 to 1.0 mm diameter, and the maximum ablation rate occurred for a dirt thickness of 3 mm. The data from her measurements are shown in Figure 6. Comp arison to these data provides a test of my model, as discussed below. As pointed out by Ball [23], small particles of dirt adhere to the snow surface. This is true only for sufficiently small dirt particles: the ad hesive force on the particle must be large compared to the gravitational force [15]. When adhesion to the snow dominates, the pieces of dirt move perpendicular to the snow surface (rather than falling straight down) as the snow ablates. Sticky dirt ther efore tends to become concentrated on the most elevated regions of the surface. (S ee Figure 4.) The con- centration of dirt on melting snow can be observed in old snow piles in cities, and is illustrated in Figure 3. This movement of dirt normal to the m elting snow surface is quantitatively well-documented in the literature (summar ized in [2]). For the argu- ments here to be correct qualitatively, the dirt need not mov e completely normal to the surface—a component of motion normal to the surface is ad equate. This mechanism explains dirt-driven structure formation: as the snow ablates, dirt becomes concentrated on the more elevated parts of the s urface. The thicker dirt FIG. 3. Photographs of dirt-driven structure, from Workman and Workman [19]. Left, ablation hollows with dirt collected on the ridges. The stru ctures are reportedly 12 to 18 inches high, p. 196. Right, dirt cones, approximately 20 to 4 0 inches high, p. 190. 5Melting Snow Surface FIG. 4. Motion of dirt on a snow surface. A particle adhered to the surface of the snow moves normal to the surface (left). When particles follow su ch “normal trajectories,” peaks are stable equilibria and valleys unstable equilibria (rig ht). forms an insulating layer on the ridges, so they ablate more s lowly. The hollows thus grow deeper. This concentration of dirt by ablation can, in e xtreme cases, lead to the formation of so-called dirt cones: cones of snow or ice cover ed by a thick layer of dirt [10,20,21,24]. (See Figure 3.) These structures can become quite large: Swithinbank [24] reports a dirt cone in the Himalaya estimated to be 85 m hi gh! Drewry [21] has done detailed experiments on dirt cones. He concludes that t he cones ultimately reach a steady state, where the motion of dirt toward the center of t he cones is balanced by the debris sliding down the cone when the slope angle is too large. The proposal of Rhodes, Armstrong, and Warren [2] that unifo rm heating causes structure only for dirty snow does not completely resolve th e disagreement about structure formation. Some observers who advocate uniform- heating driven formation of ablation hollows insist that dirt on the snow surface is no t required [11,13,16,17]. Indeed, some photographs show ablation hollows in clean sno w inside a tunnel or on other inverted surfaces, suggesting that neither dirt nor s olar illumination are nec- essary. How can this be explained? Some have suggested that a regular pattern of convection cells leads to the observed polygonal pattern [1 1,12], but a simple esti- mate shows this cannot give the correct size structures [25] . Another suggestion is that the structures are formed by turbulent eddies [13,16], although Takahashi [17] later claimed that the diameters of the hollows are independ ent of the eddy size. Takahashi [17] proposed that the separation of the air bound aray layer as it flows over a cusp could produce lower temperatures at the cusp, and therefore lead to structure formation. I am not familiar with any further theo retical or experimental consideration of the Takahashi proposal; this mechanism fo r structure formation will not be considered in this paper. Despite the extensive observations of ablation morphologi es, there is a lack of mathematical models of their growth [26]. The goal of this pa per is to quantify the primary mechanisms discussed above, and characterize t he initial stages of the instability of a flat surface. We examine how reflection of sun light and dirt affect structure formation. The nonlinear evolution more appropr iate to penitentes will be 6examined in a future paper. In this paper we consider sunlight—direct and reflected—the primary source of heat which leads to snow ablation. It is well-documented tha t radiation is the dom- inant heat source for ablating snow [27,28], especially at h igh altitudes and low lati- tudes [6]. The importance of considering reflected light as well as direct illumination is supported by the observational evidence. The fraction of light reflected from old snow is about 0.5 [10,27]. Therefore the amount of heat absor bed locally (and cor- respondingly the ablation rate) can vary by up to a factor of t wo for different parts of the surface—such a large variation can have important con sequences for structure formation. Kotlyakov and Lebedeva [6] made measurements of the albedo on a glacier with small penitentes. In a measurement averaged over surfa ce features, ten percent more light was absorbed when the sun was high overhead, presu mably indicating the absorption of reflected light in the structures. In the presence of dirt, sensible heating from the air may be i mportant, in addition to sunlight. In this paper I focus primarily on the sunlight- dominated case, and comment on similarities and differences with sensible heat. Modifying the model to include sensible heating is straightforward. By forming a quantitative model, we can test whether the effec ts considered can explain the appearance of structure, and describe the morph ologies produced. The primary goal is to formulate the simplest model which contai ns the essential physics. Ideally the theory would contain no free parameters, that is , all parameters in the model can be calculated or measured in experiments. We also d iscuss which effects are left out of the simple model, and estimate how serious are the consequences for such omissions. The first part of this paper addresses clean snow only. In sect ion I we formulate a minimal model, and carry out the analysis of the model for sm all perturbations. The linear stability analysis lets us estimate the waveleng th of the fastest-growing disturbance, and determines the initial size structures th at form. This analysis allows us to make testable predictions of the conditions necessary to observe structure. We then discuss the effect of dirt and re-formulate the model t o include dirt in section II. We compare our model to the field experiment of Dri edger and find good agreement. Thus reassured that the theory contains the impo rant physical effects, we show how dirt alters the growth of small perturbations. We show that a thin dirt layer suppresses the reflection-driven instability an d induces travelling dispersive waves on the surface. In the limit of thick dirt, we demonstra te the insulation-driven instability expected from the discussion above. 7I. LIGHT REFLECTION ON CLEAN SNOW The model for penitente growth we derive here contains simpl ifying assumptions; we hope to capture the essential features while neglecting s ome effects We will discuss the assumptions and their limits of validity as the model is d eveloped. Some of the most important simplifications include considering the lat ent heat to be constant and including only first-order, isotropic reflections. We focus on a one-dimensional model of penitentes, assuming invariance in the transverse direc tion, although it is straight- forward to generalize these equations to two dimensions or t o multiple reflections. We consider the height of the snow surface h(x, t), and seek an equation for the time evolution of h. A. Snow Ablation Heat incident on the surface leads to ablation—the height hdecreases as the snow melts or sublimates. We assume that ablated snow vanishes in to the air or drains, and therefore that the flow of water along the surface and re-free zing are not important (and similarly that other changes in the nature of the snow ar e unimportant). This model can apply to either melting or sublimation. We use the t erm “ablation” to refer to removal of snow in either way. Suppose a point on the surface absorbs a power per unit horizo ntal area P(x). The latent heat required to ablate a unit volume of snow is L. Combining this with an effective diffusive smoothing term (see below) gives the ev olution equation for the surface: ∂h ∂t=−P(x) L+D∂2h ∂x2. (1) For clean snow, we assume that Lis a constant (independent of x). This is true when the surface temperature and humidity are approxim ately constant. As discussed in the introduction, fully developed penitentes may have melting in the hollows and sublimation in the tips—a situation which requi resLto vary along the surface. Indeed, the variation in Lmight be the essential effect for large structures. For small angle structures, that is, amplitude small relati ve to wavelength, L= constant should be a good approximation. Later, we will incl ude spatial variation in the effective Ldue to dirt on the snow surface—see section II. The second term in equation 1 for the surface height is a simpl e form of the small- scale cutoff: a diffusive term with diffusion constant D. As we will see below, in the 8absence of any smoothing term, the model can produce arbitra rily small structures. This is clearly not realistic, because the physics at small s cales will cut off the instabil- ity. For the qualitative results here, the exact mechanism o f the small-scale cutoff is not essential; the main point is that there is some minimum si ze structure which can form. A natural small-scale cutoff is the extinction length o f sunlight, which defines the thickness of the snow layer in which the light scattering takes place [27]. Points on the snow surface within one extinction length are not opti cally independent, and therefore such nearby points ablate at the same rate. The ext inction length depends on the density and grain structure of the snow. The typical ex tinction length [27,28] for old snow (grain radius 1 mm) is of order 1 cm [29]. We will ch oose the diffusion coefficient so that the characteristic cutoff length is of orde r the optical extinction length. Again, remember that this term in the height equatio n is a simplified rep- resentation of the small-scale physics, and any conclusion s which depend sensitively on the form of this term should be considered suspect. Note th at diffusion of heat through the snow might seem another natural form of the small -scale cutoff; however the gradients of temperature in the snow are not large enough for thermal diffusion to stabilize short wavelengths [30]. We note here that recent work by Nodwell and Tiedje [25] consi ders the scattering of light in the snowpack in quantitative detail. They find a ra nge of length scales where suncups can form (both a minimum and maximum wavelength), a r esult which our simplified model cannot produce. B. Light Reflection In this section we describe the reflection of sunlight from th e snow surface. We assume that the sunlight shines directly down (in the −zdirection) and has a uniform power per unit length I. The parameter characterizing reflections is the albedo α, which denotes the fraction of light reflected . Thus the absorbed power per unit length is (1−α)I. For old snow—called firn—a typical value is α= 0.5 [10]. The reflecting properties of snow are different from those of a mirror. Snow looks white because it scatters light in many directions, as we wou ld expect for a rough surface. Here we treat the light using ray optics, and assume the surface reflects isotropically, thus the power is distributed uniformly int oπof solid angle outside the surface. We approximate that the reflection occurs at the sur face of the snow. (As mentioned above, the reflection takes place in a layer of orde r 1 cm thick. We ignore this in formulating the reflections, and include its effects s chematically through the diffusive term.) Using these properties, the total amount of light scattered from an interval around point x1to the interval between xandx+dxis 9αI πdθ dx 1, (2) where dθis the angle subtended by the surface between xandx+dx(see Figure 5). We can find dθin terms of the shape of the surface. dθ=dl p=|p×ds| p=∆h−∆xh′(x) ∆h2+ ∆x2. where we have used h′=∂h/∂x and ∆x=x1−x (3) ∆h=h(x1)−h(x) (4) anddsis the vector tangent to the surface ds=dx(1, h′) (5) We define the vector p, which points from the point x1to the point x. From Figure 5, we can see that p=√ ∆x2+ ∆h2 (6) dθ x' x + dxn xdlSnow Surface h(x) ds p FIG. 5. Schematic of the ablating snow surface. Scattering f rom the point x1to the interval between xandx+dxdepends on the angle dθ. The vector ppoints from x1to xand the increment dlis normal to psuch that dθ=dl/p. The vector nis normal the surface at xanddsis the increment along the surface between xandx+dx. 10To find the total power reflected to point x, we must add up the intensity scattered from all points x1: Pr(x) =αI π/integraldisplaydx1(∆h−h′(x)∆x) ∆x2+ ∆h2(7) The integrand in this equation is the propagator for light in tensity, it describes how the intensity is carried from one point to another on the surf ace;Pr(x) is the intensity due to a single reflection. To include multiple reflections, we can write the power as an integral equation for P. P(x) = (1−α)I+α π/integraldisplaydx1P(x1)(∆h−h′(x)∆x) ∆x2+ ∆h2(8) This can be written as a power series in α. We will only consider single reflections here, which does not introduce a large error when αis small. For old snow, a typical value of α≈0.5. Including the higher-order correction from multiple refl ections may be important in determining the precise details of the large st shapes. This formula for reflected intensity is not complete, becaus e it neglects the line-of- sightconstraint. Light cannot scatter from x1toxif the path of the light ray is blocked by another part of the surface. This requirement is a nonline ar constraint which is difficult to handle analytically but is straighforward to imp lement in numerics. We typically indicate the constraint schematically, by writi ng “line of sight” under the integral: Pr(x) =αI π/integraldisplay line of sightdx1(∆h−h′(x)∆x) ∆x2+ ∆h2 We can also write a necessary (but not sufficient) criterion fo r the line of sight con- straint, when applied to local analysis within one “basin.” The two points xandx1 are within line of sight of each other when the dot product of t he vector normal to the surface and the vector pis less than 0: −n·p= ∆h−∆xh′(x)>0. (See Figure 5.) Note, however, that this simple criterion will miss interme diate bumps in the surface. In other words, the constraint may be satisfied but no reflecti on occurs between x1 andxbecause the line of sight is blocked by an intervening peak. C. Model The equations combining reflection and ablation are ∂h ∂t=−αI LI(x) +Dh′′(9) 11where we have defined the integral I(x) =1 π/integraldisplay line of sightdx1(∆h−h′(x)∆x) ∆x2+ ∆h2. (10) The intensity of the sun determines a characteristic ablati on rate IL−1, where Lis the latent heat per unit volume. Combining this velocity wit h the diffusion coefficient Dgives a length ¯ℓ=DL I(11) and time ¯t=DL2 I2. (12) The solar constant gives the intensity of solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere [28]I= 1.4×106erg cm−2sec−1; we therefore choose I= 106erg cm−2sec−1as the typical value of Iunder bright sunny conditions. The latent heat depends on density. Freshly fallen snow has a density of between 0.05 an d 0.2 g cm−3, while older snow that has survived one melt season has a density ran ge of 0.4 to 0.8 g cm−3 [10,8]. Here we pick an intermediate density of 0.3 g cm−3for our estimates. This gives a latent heat per unit volume for melting L= 109erg cm−3and a melting rate I/L= 10−3cm sec−1[31]. We pick D= 2.5×10−5cm2sec−1, where this choice is made so that the most unstable wavelength is 2 cm (see below ). In this case the length scale ¯ℓ= 0.25 mm. and the time scale ¯t= 25 seconds. For sublimating snow, the latent heat is seven times larger. this gives the slower melting rate I/L= 1.4×10−3cm sec−1, larger length scale ¯ℓ= 1.75 mm and time scale¯t= 1225 seconds. We will now perform a perturbation analysis of Equations 9 to see how the size structures formed compares to the scale ¯ℓ. We have set up the problem so that structures will initially form on a scale roughly comparabl e to¯ℓ, and expect the perturbation analysis to give this result. D. Quasi-Linear Regime Here we show how an approximate linear analysis of the equati ons can be per- formed. This allows us to derive the dispersion relation, wh ich characterizes when the system is stable or unstable. There is a fastest growing m ode determined by the 12competition between reflection and diffusion. The length sca le of this mode is related to the basic scale ¯ℓfrom dimensional analysis above; we determine the prefacto r here. The results are significant because they describe how the phy sical parameters affect the instability. We will argue that reflection favors struct ures on scales as small as possible. On the other hand, the small-scale cutoff limits th e smallest structures possible. Therefore we expect the fastest-growing mode to b e of order the cutoff size. The reflection integral is scale invariant: upon rescaling xandhby the same amount the integral I(x) is unchanged. Thus in the absence of diffusion, there is no characteristic scale in the problem. Therefore a shape wi th aspect ratio 1—a shape with variations in hcomparable to variations in x—should have a growth rate of order 1 (in the absence of boundary effects). The integral c ontributes a shape factor independent of the amplitude of the shape δ. Therefore the rate of change of amplitude ˙δis constant. To examine shapes with aspect ratio far from one, we start wit h an aspect-ratio 1 shape, then transform x→λxandh→δh. When δ≪λ, we find that the integral scales with the basic angle δ/λ:I →δ/λI. Thus for small perturbations, we expect a growth rate proportional to the amplitude ( ˙δ∼δ). For sufficiently small δ/λ, we treat the contribution from the reflection integral as a numerical factor of order 1. Note that a sinusoidal perturb ation is not an eigenshape for small amplitudes; we do not know what the actual eigensha pes are. The dominant contribution is the scaling with δ, and we neglect the other (slower) dependence on position, amplitude, etc. Thus the quasilinear equation for a small-amplitude variation in the surface h=δsinqx eωtis approximately I(x)≈q πδsinqx eωt(13) which gives a dispersion relation ω=αI πLq−Dq2(14) This argument selects a fastest-growing mode with wavenumb er q∗=αI 2πLD(15) ω∗=(αI)2 4π2L2D=q2 ∗D (16) These equations are the dimensional analysis result, with a n estimate of the prefactor from the scaling argument. Plugging in values of typical par ameters given above, we find the most unstable wavelength for melting λ∗= 2π/q∗of 2 cm, and characteristic 13time 4000 sec. In the case of sublimation the wavelength is 14 cm and the time 2 ×105 sec. The choice of the diffusion coefficient is now clear: we cho seDto give a most unstable wavelength of 2 cm. We have put in diffusion as a simpl ified representation of the small-scale physics, and chosen its value so that the n umbers make sense. It is important to remember that because of this choice of D, the numbers calculated here cannot be considered a prediction of the initial size st ructures that form. The calculation of real interest is how this instability is chan ged by dirt, as discussed in the following section. Although it agrees well with simulations of initial growh of perturbations which compute the reflected intensity at each point , we must rememb er that this analysis is only quasi-linear because we do not know the eigenfunctions of the reflection integral, and superposition does not hold: because the integral is non local, a surface variation with two modes of different wavelength cannot be described by the addition of two modes with different q. II. EFFECTS OF DIRT A layer of dirt on the surface of the snow changes its properti es. We model both the optical and insulating effects of dirt, and fit the theory t o melting data measured by Driedger [22] . These data allow measurement of a crucial p arameter in the model, and the good agreement between theory and experiment show th at we have captured the important effects of dirt. The essential features are tha t thin dirt speeds ablation, because it increases absorption, while thick dirt insulate s the snow, slowing ablation. This basic behavior leads to the two different regimes of inst ability [2]. Dirt looks black because it absorbs light. The presence of di rt effectively decreases the surface albedo and therefore increases the fraction of a bsorbed light. We assume light has a probability of being absorbed that is constant pe r unit thickness of dirt. The fraction of light not absorbed by the dirt is e−s/se[32], where sis the dirt thickness andsethe extinction length in the dirt—typically of order the cha racteristic dirt particle size. Therefore dirt modifies the albedo according to αd=αe−s/se. (17) Note that absorption by the dirt layer is not isotropic—more light will be absorbed near grazing incidence, decreasing the reflection even more . The qualitative effect of dirt remains the same however, and thus we neglect this ani sotropy. Increased absorption through a lower effective albedo hastens snow abl ation. But the dirt also slows ablation. In the presence of an insulating dirt layer, the temperature at the surface of the snow is decreased below the ambient temperature, 14and more heat is required to ablate a given amount of snow. Sup pose an amount of heatLis necessary to ablate a unit area of clean snow. How much addi tional heat is required in the presence of a dirt layer? At steady state the t emperature satisfies ∇2T= 0. (18) When the radius of curvature of the surface is large compared to the dirt thickness (the important limit for growth of perturbations) we can tre at the snow surface as planar, leading to variations in Tin the zdirection only. The boundary conditions are: At the dirt-air interface ( z= 0), the temperature must be equal to the ambient temperature. The temperature gradient at the surface due to heat flux into the dirt from the air is T′(z= 0) = P/κ, where Pis the incident power flux and κthe thermal conductivity of the dirt. Thus we find that the temperature at the snow surface is less than T(z= 0) by an amount ∆ T=Ps/κ. An extra amount of heat ∆ Q=C∆T is needed to raise the snow temperature up to its value in the a bsence of dirt, where Cis the heat capacity of the snow. Thus the effective latent hea t for a dirt thickness sis Ld=L+CPs κ(19) BothLandCdepend on the ambient temperature T. However, the dependence is sufficiently weak that we can neglect it. Combining these two effects we find that the snow ablation velo city for a flat surface covered with dirt is m(s) =I Lg(s) (20) where gis a dimensionless function of the dirt thickness. In this mo del, g(s) =1−αe−s/se 1 +γs(1−αe−s/se)(21) where we have defined the dimensionless measure of the insula ting value of dirt: γ=seCI Lκ. (22) The non-monotonic behavior of this curve—positive slope fo r small sand negative for large s—is the important qualitative result. Note that in the absen ce of dirt the ablation rate is as expected: m(s= 0) =I L(1−α) (23) 150510152025300.811.21.41.61.82 Dirt thickness sMelting Rate m/m(s=0)Theory Driedger 1981 FIG. 6. A plot of the relative ablation rate m/m(s= 0) versus dirt thickness. The points are the data measured by Driedger [22]. The solid curv e is a one-parameter fit to Equation 21, yielding the fitted γ= 0.047. Note the fastest ablation occurs for dimensionless s≈3. We picked se= 1 mm from Driedger’s measurement of the dirt particle size, and albedo α= 0.5 from other measurements [27]. We can also estimate the para meter γ(see text). The estimate gives γwithin a factor of 2 of the value obtained from this fit. A fit to the data of Driedger [22] is shown in Figure 6. Driedger measured melting rates of a flat surface for different dirt thickness. The plot s howsm/m(s= 0) versus dimensionless dirt thickness. We picked se= 1 mm from Driedger’s measurement of the dirt particle size. Fitting the data to Equation 21 all ows us to determine the dimensionless insulation coefficient γ. For α≈0.5 (from other measurements [27]) the fit gives γ= 0.047. We can also estimate the parameter γusing other data (see below). The estimate gives γclose to the value obtained from this fit. This model and the experiment of Driedger are in the regime wh ere solar radiation is the dominant heat source. The discussion of Rhodes et. al. [2] points out that the ablation curve changes when sensible heating is importa nt. In fact, if radiation is negligible the curve will monotonically decrease as the d irt thickness increases, because light absorption effects disappear in this limit. It is straightforward to adjust the model to include other sources of heating. Measurements of the type Driedger performed, compared to the type of model presented here, cou ld in principle give information on the relative importance of radiant and sensi ble heating. 16A. Dynamics of Dirt As the snow surface ablates, the dirt layer on it moves (Figur e 4). We assume the particles are sufficiently small that the snow moves purel y normal to the surface. The sideways ( x-direction) velocity of a piece of dirt is v=−˙hh′(24) The thickness of the dirt s(x) must obey a conservation equation ˙ s+∇·(vs) = 0, since we assume dirt is neither deposited on nor removed from the su rface. The evolution equation for the thickness of dirt is thus ∂s ∂t=−∂ ∂x(vs) = (˙hh′s)′(25) When the surface of the snow is flat ( h′= 0) the velocity of the dirt v= 0. Thus the tops of peaks and the bottoms of valleys are equilibrium poin ts. The peaks are stable equilibria where dirt becomes concentrated, while valleys are unstable (Figure 4). B. Model We now rewrite the model equations incorporating dirt. We ha ve equations for the height of the surface h, the dirt thickness s, and the incident power P. −˙h=P(x) L1 1 +C κLPs+Dh′′(26) ˙s=/parenleftBig˙hh′s/parenrightBig′(27) The only sources of heat flux Pwe will consider are direct and reflected radiation. P(x) L= (1−αe−s/se)I L+αe−s/seI πL/integraldisplay line of sightdx1(∆h−h′(x)∆x) ∆x2+ ∆h2(28) We use the same reference ablation rate as in Section I: I/L= 10−3cm sec−1. However, the presence of dirt introduces a new length scale i n the problem: the length scale for light absorption by the dirt. We choose to nondimen sionalize in terms of this length, since the physically important regimes of thin and t hick dirt are measured relative to this thickness. When Driedger measured diamete rs of ash particles on a glacier, 90 percent of the particles had diameters between 0.25 and 1.0 mm [22]. 17We therefore choose se= 1 mm as the order of magnitude extinction length for dirt absorption; this choice is supported by the good fit to the dat a. The dimensionless timescale comes from combining the ablat ion rate and length scale: ¯td=Lse/I= 100 seconds. This is the time for a depth seof snow to melt in bright sun. Glacial debris has κ≈2×104erg cm−1sec−1◦K [33]. This allows us to estimate the dimensionless parameter γ=seCI/(Lκ) = 0.03. Note that the thermal conductivity and the specific heat depend on the dens ity, wetness, etc. The fit to Driedger’s data (Figure 6) gives a value of γ≈0.047, somewhat larger than this estimate. We interpret this as a measurement of the dirt thermal conductivity κ, and therefore use the implied value κ= 1.3×104erg cm−1sec−1◦K. The nondi- mensionalized diffusion constant is D¯td/s2 e= 0.25. For sublimation the time scale ¯td≈700 seconds and the dimensionless diffusion constant D¯td/s2 e≈1.75; the dimensionless parameter γsimilarly decreases by a factor of 7. The nondimensionalized equations are ˙h=−P 1 +γPs+D∇2h (29) ˙s=/parenleftBig˙hh′s/parenrightBig′(30) P=r(1−αe−s) +αe−sr π/integraldisplay line of sightdx1(∆h−h′(x)∆x) ∆x2+ ∆h2(31) The dimensionless control parameters are r, the solar light intensity; and s, the initial dirt thickness. Here we have introduced the parameter r: r=I L103sec/cm (32) to examine the effects of varying the light intensity away fro m the typical value. C. Linear Analysis Here we analyze the stability of equations (29–31), includi ng effects of dirt. There are two important regimes: when the initial dirt thickness i s small compared to se, the dirt acts to modify the reflection-driven instability. W e find that the instability is suppressed by the absorption of the dirt layer, exponential ly in the dirt thickness. In this regime, dirt can also a induce travelling, dispersive i nstability of the snow surface. Qualitatively, this dispersion arises from the coupling of dirt motion to absorption. Dirt migrates to the highest point on the surface—but then th e thicker dirt increases 18FIG. 7. The symmetric (left) and antisymmetric (right) mode s of dirt modulation. The antisymmetric mode is the physically important one beca use the symmetric mode is unstable. the ablation of that peak, and it ablates until it is no longer a local maximum. The existence of these waves is an experimentally testable pred iction which has not, to my knowledge, been discussed before. The other limit is when the dirt thickness is large compared t ose. The effective albedo αe−s→0. Therefore the dirt instability is independent of light re flections; the “light” therefore acts simply as a source of heat. The ins tability is driven by dirt insulating the snow. The characteristic length and tim e scale of the instability depends only on the thermal properties of the dirt. Within th is insulation-dominated regime, the behavior of the instability depends on whether s≪1/(γr) ors≫ 1/(γr)—see below. Thus there are three different regimes of behavi or, depending the dirt thickness. As mentioned above, under different weather conditions unif orm heating from the air may be more important than radiant heating. In this case a ny amount of dirt slows ablation of the snow [2], and the insulation-driven instabi lity is the only one possible. This can be included in the model by removing the dirt-depend ent absorption of light. We will perform a linear perturbation analysis: we assume th atvariations of the dirt thickness ∆ sare always small. However, the initial uniform dirt thickne sssomay be large or small relative to se; this initial thickness determines the limit of instabilit y. D. Thin Dirt Limit Here we consider the limit so≪se, meaning the initial uniform dirt thickness is small compared to the extinction length. There are in general two modes of dirt modulation (Figure 7): the symmetric mode with constant thickness and the antisymmetric mode wit h ∆s= 2ǫcosqx. The symmetric mode, because it has constant thickness, it simpl er to analyze. Note that constant dirt thickness is unstable: any modulation in the d irt thickness tends to grow. 191. Symmetric Mode Because the symmetric mode has constant thickness, it insul ates the snow surface uniformly. Therefore, no thick dirt instability can arise f rom the symmetric mode. But the symmetric mode affects the reflection-driven instabi lity. We look for solutions of the form h=−mt+δeωtcosqx (33) where m(s) is the ablation rate of a flat surface covered with dirt, calc ulated above. The dirt thickness so= constant. We expand the equations to first order in δ. The resulting dispersion relation is ω=αre−soq π(1 + (1 −α)γrso)2−Dq2. (34) Compare this to the clean snow dispersion relation, Equatio n 14. The first term (proportional to q) contains the factor e−so. This term decreases exponentially with increasing dirt thickness. For somuch larger than one, this term is so small that the instability practically does not exist. The factor (1 + (1 −α)γrso)2in the dispersion relation results from uniform insulation by the dirt layer. The most unstable mode q∗is q∗=αre−so 2πD(1 + (1 −α)γrso)2(35) ω∗=q2 ∗D (36) Figure 8 shows how dirt cuts off the instability, with fixed lig ht intensity r= 1. When so≪1, the wavelength is close to the wavelength in the absence of dirt. However, the absorption of light by dirt becomes important for so>0.1 and the wavelength increases exponentially. As the wavelength increases, the growth rate of the instability decreases, and the instability becomes less readily observ ed. 2. Antisymmetric Mode The antisymmetric mode involves variations in the thicknes s of the dirt. We must solve for the coupling between snow ablation and dirt motion . The solution is of the form h=−mt+δeωtcosqx (37) s=so+ 2ǫeωtcosqx (38) 2010−210−110001510 Dirt Thickness sWavelength λ* FIG. 8. Wavelength of the Reflection-Driven Instability. Th e wavelength is normalized to the most unstable wavelength of clean snow. When so≪1, the wavelength is close to the wavelength in the absence of dirt. However, the absorpti on of light by dirt becomes important for so>0.1 and the wavelength increases rapidly. The plot is for fixed s olar intensity r= 1, a typical value. Parameter values for this plot are as dis cussed in the text: α= 0.5,D= 0.25,γ= 0.047. where sis the uniform dirt thickness at t= 0. Upon linearization, Equation 30 for the motion of dirt relates the perturbation amplitudes ǫ δ=msoq2 2ω. (39) The dispersion relation, to second order in q, is ω= [1±/radicalBig f]αre−soq 2π(1 +γr′so)2−[1∓1√f]Dq2 2(40) where fis, defining w= 1/(1 + (1 −α)γrso) and recalling m= (1−αe−so)rwis the dimensionless melting rate as a function of dirt thickness, f= (αre−soπ−1w2)2(1 +4som(m2γ−αre−sow2) (αre−soπ−1w2)2(41) In the limit so→0, this dispersion relation is identical to the symmetric mo de. However, for increasing dirt thickness it contains effects f rom the dirt modulation. The term fcan be negative , leading to an oscillatory component to ω. Thus dirt can cause the instability to travel on the snow surface, in a regi on of phase space shown 2110−210−110010−1100101 Dirt Thickness sIncident Heat rTravelling Instability FIG. 9. Travelling Instability in the Reflection-Driven Ins tability. Under the line, there is an imaginary part of ω, showing the regime where travelling waves exist. The dirt thickness is normalized so so= 1 corresponds to one extinction length; similarly, r= 1 is a typical intensity of sunlight. For the typical solar brigh tness r= 1, any dirt thickness so>0.008 will show a travelling instability; therefore most dirt y snow surfaces should show this behavior. Parameter values for this plot are as discuss ed in the text: α= 0.5,D= 0.25, γ= 0.047. in Figure 9. For the typical solar brightness r= 1, any dirt thickness so>0.008 will induce travelling; therefore, most dirty snow surface s should show this behavior. Qualitatively, this arises from the coupling of dirt motion to absorption. Dirt migrates to the highest point on the surface—but then the thicker dirt increases the ablation of that peak, and it ablates until it is no longer a local maxim um. The positive and negative roots in the dispersion relation correspond to lef t and right moving modes. The existence of these travelling instabilities is an exper imentally testable prediction. Note that the equation is not well-behaved for f= 0. When f= 0 the terms in the equation coupling motion of dirt to ablation vanish; t he dispersion relation reduces to the expression for the symmetric mode above. When fis negative, we can find the fastest growing wavelength by loo king at the real part of ω: q∗=αe−sor 2πD(1 + (1 −α)γrso)2(42) ω∗=D 2q2 ∗ (43) 22E. Thick Dirt Limit The equations are considerably simplified in the limit of thi ck dirt so≫1. The effective albedo αe−so→0. Therefore the dirt instability is independent of any reflections; the quasi-linearized equations are truly line ar in this limit. The thick-dirt instability is driven purely by dirt motion coupled to slowe r ablation under a thicker dirt layer. This instability is the linear precursor to the d irt cones of Figure 3. Note that if light is not an important source of heat, the “thi ck dirt limit” is actually valid for all dirt thicknesses. 10010110210300.250.51 Dirt Thickness sλ* FIG. 10. Most unstable wavelength λ∗versus dirt thickness so, with typical heat flux r= 1. The wavelength is normalized to the most unstable wavele ngth of clean snow. Comparing this figure to the thin-dirt instability, we see th at when so>1 the wavelength will initially decrease, then increase beyond so= 20. The growth rate of this instability will be greatest where the wavelength is smallest. Replacing αe−so→0, the symmetric mode disappears. The background ablation ratem=r/(1 +γrso). The dispersion relation is, to second order in q, ω=±√γsom3 2q−D 2q2(44) Here no imaginary component to the dispersion relation is pr esent; it is a straight- forward linear instability with one growing mode. The most u nstable wavenumber is q∗=1 2D/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbtγr3so (1 +γrso)3(45) 23For a fixed value of the heat input r, the most unstable wavelength scales differently at small and large so: λ∗∼s−1/2 oforso≪1/(γr) (46) ∼soforso≫1/(γr) (47) The location of the minimum wavelength is determined by the d imensionless param- eterγ, which represents how well the snow insulates per unit thick ness. Therefore, even for optically thick dirt so≫1 there is a change in the behavior, depending on the value of socompared to the insulation parameter. Since typically γr= 0.05, these limits are consistent. There is an optimal so∼1/(γr)≈2 cm where the wavelength is smallest. Figure 10 illustrates this: it shows the unstable wavelength vs. di rt thickness for the typical r= 1, with the optimal so≈20≈2 cm. Comparing this figure to the thin-dirt instability, we see that when so>1 the wavelength will initially decrease, then increase beyond so= 20. The growth rate of this instability will be greatest whe re the wavelength is smallest. III. DISCUSSION: COMPARISON TO EXPERIMENT This paper has presented work on a simple theory to describe t he initial formation ablation structures such as suncups, penitentes and dirt co nes. We have tried to make the model as simple as possible while including the esse ntial physics. As we have shown, most parameters in the equations can be calculat ed or measured in experiments, allowing predictions with no free parameters . The exception is the effective diffusion coefficient D, which we estimate using the value for light diffusion. However, we have not realistically treated the small-scale scattering of light in these schematic results. At this point, the only quantitative comparison between thi s model and experi- ment is the prediction of ablation rate of a flat snow surface, compared with the data of Driedger in Figure 6. This measurement allows us to extrac t the dimensionless constant governing dirt insulation. The good agreement ind icates we have captured the important effects of dirt. The linear stability analysis of the equations shows the two types of instability described in the literature. The model predicts the depende nce of the most unstable wavelength and characteristic growth rate on the experimen tal control parameters, predictions which could be tested. We argue that for little o r no surface dirt, light reflection drives the instability. This instability is expo nentially suppressed by a dirt layer, consistent with field observations. We predict trave lling modes induced by a 24modulated dirt layer in this regime. The existence of such tr avelling modes is an experimentally testable new phenomenon. In the presence of a thick layer of dirt, our analysis finds the insulation-driven in- stability, as expected. Here we predict an optimal dirt thic kness where the instability is most easily observed, which depends on the thermal proper ties of the dirt. The visually striking structures in the field are the larger s tructures: penitentes and dirt cones. Understanding the nonlinear regime of the mo del presented here is therefore of interest, and will be the subject of a future pap er. The scale of both pen- itentes and dirt cones is typically larger than the size of sm aller-amplitude structures. One way to explain this, which has been suggested from observ ations [8,20], is that large structures grow at the expense of small ones. Such coar sening behavior is also apparent in preliminary work on the nonlinear regime of the m odel presented here. The most obvious problem with the results here is that we have considered vari- ation of the surface height in only one direction. Checking w hether the results are the same for a realistic 2D surface is a necessary extension o f this work. A better understanding of the small-scale cutoff is also important. I n particular, we need to understand how using different representations of the short -scale physics affect the numerical predictions (of the fastest-growing wavelength , for example). Because the model here is simplified, we have left out some phy sical effects which may be important in the experiment. Our treatment of light re flection considered single reflections only, which may be a bad approximation wit h the albedo is close to 1 (large amount reflected). In the field, the sun of course is no t always high overhead— the variation of the angle of incident light over the course o f the day might change the shapes. Other possibly important effects which can occur in fi eld situations include other sources of heat transfer to the surface, gravity, and t he deposition/removal of dirt. Better comparison with lab or field experiments should indicate which of these effects are most important to include. Acknowledgements: I am grateful to John Wettlaufer and Norb ert Untersteiner for comments on this paper. I thank Eric Nodwell and Tom Tiedj e for discussing their work on this problem with me. I also wish to thank Michae l Brenner, Daniel Fisher, David Weitz, Martine Benamar, David Lubensky, and D avid Nelson for helpful discussions, questions, and criticism. This work was suppo rted by the NSF under grant DMS9733030. 25REFERENCES [1] A. Post and E. R. LaChapelle. Glacier Ice . University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, 1971. [2] J. J. Rhodes, R. L. Armstrong, and S. G. Warren. Mode of for mation of “ablation hollows” controlled by dirt content of snow. Journal of Glaciology , 33:135–139, 1987. [3] Charles Darwin. The Voyage of the Beagle , Chapter XV: Passage of the Cordillera. 1836. The quotation is from the entry for March 2 2, 1835. [4] F. E. Matthes. Ablation of snow-fields at high altitudes b y radiant solar heat. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union , 15:380, 1934. [5] S. Hastenrath and B. Koci. Micro-morphology of the snow s urface at the Quelc- caya ice cap, Peru. Journal of Glaciology , 97:423, 1981. [6] V. M. Kotlyakov and I. M. Lebedeva. Nieve and ice penitent es. Their way of formation and indicative significance. Zeitschrift fur Gletscherkunde und Glazial- geologie , 10:111, 1974. [7] C. Troll. Busserschnee in den Hochgebirgen der Erde . Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 1942. Erganzungsheft Nr. 240. [8] Louis Lliboutry. The origin of penitents. Journal of Glaciology , 2:331–338, 1954. [9] G. C. Amstutz. On the formation of snow penitentes. Journal of Glaciology , 3:304–311, 1958. [10] Douglas I. Benn and David J. A. Evans. Glaciers and Glaciation . Wiley, 1998. [11] J. Leighly. Cuspate surfaces of melting ice and firn. Geographical Review , 38:301, 1948. [12] W. E. Richardson. Dirt polygons. Weather , 9:117, 1954. [13] W. E. Richardson and R. D. M. Harper. Ablation polygons o n snow—further observations and theories. Journal of Glaciology , 3:25, 1957. [14] A. Jahn and M. Klapa. On the origion of ablation hollows ( polygons) on snow. Journal of Glaciology , 7:299, 1968. [15] I. Y. Ashwell and F. G. Hannell. Experiments on a snow-pa tch in the mountains of sweden. Journal of Glaciology , 6:135, 1966. [16] S. Takahashi, T. Fujii, and T. Ishida. Origin developme nt of polygonal ablation hollows on a snow surface. Low Temperature Science Series A , (31):191, 1973. [17] S. Takahashi. A study on ablation hollows on a melting sn ow surface. Low Tem- perature Science Series A , (37):13, 1978. [18] The articles describing these experiments are in Japan ese, which the author un- fortunately does not understand. [19] Fanny Bullock Workman and William Hunter Workman. Peaks and Glaciers of Nun Kun . Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1909. [20] J. W. Wilson. The initiation of dirt cones on snow. Journal of Glaciology , 2:281– 287, 1953. 26[21] D. J. Drewry. A quantitative assessment of dirt-cone dy namics. Journal of Glaciology , 11:431–446, 1972. [22] C. L. Driedger. Effect of ash thickness on snow ablation. In P. W. Lipman and D. R. Mullineaux, editors, The 1980 Eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washing- ton, Geological Survey Professional Paper 1250, pages 757–760 . United States Government Printing Office, 1981. [23] F. K. Ball. Dirt polygons on snow. Weather , 9:322, 1954. [24] C. Swithinbank. The origin of dirt cones on glaciers. Journal of Glaciology , 1:471, 1950. [25] Eric Nodwell and Thomas Tiedje. Personal communicatio n. 2000. [26] Rhodes, Armstrong, and Warren [2] report two “initial a ttempts at modeling” published in German. Currently Nodwell and Tiedje are inves tigating the forma- tion of suncups (personal communication). They consider in detail the scattering of light in the snowpack, and deduce a range of allowable sunc up sizes from this. [27] W. J. Wiscombe and S. G. Warren. A model for the spectral a lbedo of snow. I: Pure snow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , 37:2712–2733, 1980. [28] C. J. Van Der Veen. Fundamentals of Glacier Dynamics . A. A. Balkema, 1999. [29] Note that the 1 cm extinction length comes primarily fro m near-infrared wavelengths—the wavelengths of light which make the domina nt contribution to the albedo and to ablation. Shorter wavelengths of visibl e light can penetrate much farther into the snow, 20 to 50 cm in old snow. See Wiscomb e and Warren [27] for a thorough discussion of these effects. [30] One might think that diffusion of heat through the snow ca n be an important stabilizing factor. However, a simple calculation shows th at this is not sufficient to provide a short-wavelength cutoff. I coupled temperature diffusion in the snow with heat conservation on the interface, assuming constant temperature in the air. This gives a dispersion relation with a qterm from reflections, as in the text, and a term proportional to −√1 +q2from diffusion in the snow. As a result of this qdependence, at short wavelengths the stabilization by heat diffusion is controlled by a dimensionless parameter ∆ = ( Ts−T∞)C L−1, where Ts−T∞ is the temperature difference between the surface of the snow and deep in the snow, Cis the specific heat, and Lthe latent heat. In order for heat diffusion in the snow to stabilize short wavelengths, we must have ∆ ≥0.47. However, C/L≈6×10−3/◦K. Thus for a temperature difference of 10◦C the parameter ∆≈6×10−2, which is far too low to provide the cutoff. [31] If most melting takes place during four hours of the day w hen the sun is most intense, this number gives 14 cm/day for the melting rate of t he snow. It is useful to compare this to the field measurements of Kotlyakov and Leb edeva on peni- tente formation [6]. If we divide their measurement of the to tal radiation received in one day by the solar intensity at noon, we would get 3.5 hour s estimated il- lumination time. They typically found snow height decrease s of 6 cm/day. Thus our estimate may be too high, but is the correct order of magni tude. Kotlyakov 27and Lebedeva found 1.5 m high penitentes formed in 24 days. [32] When defined this way, seis an extinction length for reflections, which differs by a factor of two from the transmission extinction length. [33] Drewry [21] deduces a value of 5.6 ×104erg cm−1sec−1◦K for debris covering dirt cones, which he compares to other measurements for sand around 2 ×104 erg cm−1sec−1◦K. 28

arXiv:physics/0008001 1 Aug 2000/G35/G28/G26/G37/G24/G31/G2A/G38/G2F/G24/G35/G03/G3A/G24/G39/G28/G2A/G38/G2C/G27/G28/G03/G2B/G32/G30/G03/G26/G32/G38/G33/G2F/G28/G35/G03/G29/G32/G35/G03/G24/G03/G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24 /G36/G38/G33/G28/G35/G36/G37/G35/G38/G26/G37/G38/G35/G28 /G24/G11/G25/G4F/G48/G47/G51/G5C/G4E/G4B/G0F/G03/G27/G11/G2E/G52/G56/G57/G4C/G51/G0F/G03/G39/G11/G2E/G44/G4F/G4D/G58/G5D/G4B/G51/G5C/G0F/G03/G30/G11/G2F/G44/G4F/G44/G5C/G44/G51/G0F/G03/G32/G11/G30/G4C/G4F/G52/G59/G44/G51/G52/G59/G0F/G03/G24/G11/G33/G52/G51/G52/G50/G44/G55/G48/G51/G4E/G52/G0F/G03/G31/G11/G36/G52/G45/G48/G51/G4C/G51/G0F /G24/G11/G36/G58/G4F/G4C/G50/G52/G59/G0F/G03/G27/G11/G37/G55/G58/G45/G4C/G51/G0F/G03/G24/G11/G3D/G44/G59/G44/G47/G5D/G48/G59/G0F/G03/G30/G28/G33/G4B/G2C/G0F/G03/G30/G52/G56/G46/G52/G5A/G0F/G03/G35/G58/G56/G56/G4C/G44 /G03/G30/G11/G27/G52/G4B/G4F/G58/G56/G0F/G03/G27/G28/G36/G3C/G0F/G03/G2B/G58/G50/G45/G58/G55/G4A/G0F/G03/G2A/G48/G55/G50/G44/G51/G5C /G24/G45/G56/G57/G55/G44/G46/G57 /G36/G52/G50/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G4C/G49/G4C/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G44/G03 /G35/G48/G46/G57/G44/G51/G4A/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03 /G3A/G44/G59/G48/G4A/G58/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G56/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G58/G55/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G48/G51 /G4C/G51/G59/G48/G56/G57/G4C/G4A/G44/G57/G48/G47/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G56/G48/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G56/G03 /G44/G55/G48/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G45/G48 /G4C/G51/G56/G57/G44/G4F/G4F/G48/G47/G03 /G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G58/G55/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G47 /G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G52/G57/G4B/G03 /G48/G51/G47/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G4C/G57/G11/G03 /G3A/G48/G03 /G4C/G51/G59/G48/G56/G57/G4C/G4A/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G44/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G2B/G32/G30 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G44/G57/G57/G44/G46/G4B/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56 /G52/G55/G4C/G48/G51/G57/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G44/G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G44/G5B/G4C/G56/G03 /G0B/G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G4C/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G0C/G0F /G53/G48/G55/G53/G48/G51/G47/G4C/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G4C/G57/G03 /G0B/G44/G5D/G4C/G50/G58/G57/G44/G4F/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G0C/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G56/G52/G50/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G4A/G4F/G48/G03 /G57/G52 /G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G44/G5B/G4C/G56/G11/G03 /G29/G52/G55/G03 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G45/G52/G57/G4B/G03 /G53/G52/G4F/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G48/G59/G48/G55/G5C/G03 /G47/G48/G56/G4C/G4A/G51/G03 /G5A/G48/G55/G48/G03 /G58/G56/G48/G47/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G53/G44/G53/G48/G55/G03 /G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G56 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G45/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G48/G47/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G56/G46/G44/G4F/G48/G47/G10/G58/G53/G03 /G56/G48/G57/G58/G53/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G16/G03 /G2A/G2B/G5D/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G55/G52/G52/G50 /G57/G48/G50/G53/G48/G55/G44/G57/G58/G55/G48/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G44/G47/G59/G44/G51/G57/G44/G4A/G48/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B /G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G4C/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G46/G52/G50/G53/G44/G46/G57 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G56/G52/G50/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G4A/G4F/G48/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G44/G5B/G4C/G56/G03 /G44/G55/G48 /G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G51/G11/G03 /G24/G55/G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G46/G55/G5C/G52/G56/G57/G44/G57/G03 /G44/G51/G47 /G4B/G48/G44/G57/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G47/G58/G48/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G29/G30/G03 /G4F/G52/G56/G56/G48/G56/G03 /G44/G55/G48/G03 /G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G48/G47/G11 /G26/G44/G4F/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G47/G48/G56/G4C/G4A/G51/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G49/G48/G48/G47/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G49/G52/G55 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G58/G55/G48/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G48/G47/G11 /G14/G03/G03/G2C/G31/G37/G35/G32/G27/G38/G26/G37/G2C/G32/G31 /G3A/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G46/G4B/G52/G56/G48/G51/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G50/G52/G46/G4E/G10/G58/G53/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G58/G55/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G52/G53/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03 /G15/G11/G1C/G1B/G14/G03 /G2A/G2B/G5D/G03 /G4C/G51/G56/G57/G48/G44/G47/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G14/G11/G16/G03 /G2A/G2B/G5D/G03 /G4C/G51 /G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G55/G48/G47/G58/G46/G48/G03 /G4C/G57/G56/G03 /G47/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G4F/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G56/G46/G44/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G49/G44/G46/G57/G52/G55 /G2E /G56/G46/G4F /G20/G15/G11/G15/G1C/G16/G11/G03 /G24/G4F/G56/G52/G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G47/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G44/G4F/G4F/G03 /G46/G48/G4F/G4F/G56/G03 /G48/G5B/G46/G48/G53/G57/G03 /G48/G51/G47 /G52/G51/G48/G56/G03 /G5A/G48/G55/G48/G03 /G47/G48/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G47/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G15/G11/G15/G1C/G16/G03 /G57/G4C/G50/G48/G56/G03 /G44/G56/G03 /G46/G52/G50/G53/G44/G55/G48/G47/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03 /G47/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 [/G14]/G11/G03 /G28/G51/G47/G03 /G46/G48/G4F/G4F/G56/G03 /G4C/G55/G4C/G56/G03 /G47/G4C/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G56/G03 /G5A/G48/G55/G48 /G17/G1C/G11/G1A/G13/G03 /G50/G50/G03 /G0B/G14/G14/G17/G50/G50/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G14/G11/G16/G2A/G2B/G5D/G0C/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G16/G17/G11/G13/G17/G03 /G50/G50/G03 /G0B/G1A/G1B/G50/G50/G03 /G44/G57 /G14/G11/G16/G2A/G2B/G5D/G0C/G11 /G3A/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G48/G5B/G44/G50/G4C/G51/G48/G47/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G3E/G15/G40/G03 /G44/G03 /G59/G44/G55/G4C/G44/G51/G57/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G56/G48/G57/G10/G58/G53/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G56/G57/G4C/G51/G4A /G52/G49/G03 /G29/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03 /G30/G52/G47/G48/G03 /G0B/G29/G30/G0C/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G56/G58/G45/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G55/G48/G48/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G56/G0F/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B /G44/G5D/G4C/G50/G58/G57/G4B/G44/G4F/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G11/G03 /G36/G58/G46/G4B/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G4B/G44/G56 /G44/G53/G53/G48/G44/G55/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G45/G48/G03 /G4C/G51/G48/G49/G49/G4C/G46/G4C/G48/G51/G57/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A/G11 /G2C/G51/G56/G57/G48/G44/G47/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G4C/G57/G03 /G44/G51/G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03 /G59/G44/G55/G4C/G44/G51/G57/G03 /G5A/G44/G56/G03 /G53/G55/G52/G53/G52/G56/G48/G47/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G29/G30 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G44/G57/G57/G44/G46/G4B/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G44/G03 /G45/G48/G4A/G4C/G51/G51/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G58/G55/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G47 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G47/G48/G59/G4C/G46/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G56/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G55/G4C/G48/G51/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G44/G4F/G52/G51/G4A /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G44/G5B/G4C/G56/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G53/G55/G48/G49/G48/G55/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G03 /G49/G52/G55 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G45/G58/G57/G03 /G4C/G57/G56/G03 /G47/G4C/G56/G44/G47/G59/G44/G51/G57/G44/G4A/G48/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G47/G58/G48/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G4C/G51/G56/G58/G49/G49/G4C/G46/G4C/G48/G51/G57/G03 /G53/G4F/G44/G46/G48/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G44/G51/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G53/G4F/G44/G46/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G03 /G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G57/G5A/G52 /G56/G58/G45/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G0F/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G4C/G57/G03 /G46/G44/G51/G03 /G45/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G58/G51/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G52/G51/G4F/G5C/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G48/G51/G47/G56/G03 /G52/G49 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G58/G55/G48/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G47/G48/G59/G4C/G46/G48/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56 /G55/G48/G59/G52/G4F/G59/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G56/G52/G50/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G4A/G4F/G48/G03 /G49/G55/G52/G50/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G44/G5B/G4C/G56/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G55/G48 /G56/G58/G4C/G57/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G47/G48/G59/G4C/G46/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G56/G58/G45/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G48/G4D/G48/G46/G57/G48/G55/G03 /G49/G4C/G4F/G57/G48/G55/G03 /G5A/G44/G56/G03 /G58/G56/G48/G47/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G52/G53/G48/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G03 /G53/G48/G51/G48/G57/G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G53/G55/G48/G59/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03 /G57/G4B/G4C/G56 /G47/G48/G59/G4C/G46/G48/G11 /G15/G03/G03/G37/G2B/G28/G03/G37/G28/G36/G37/G03/G30/G32/G27/G38/G2F/G28 /G3A/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G47/G48/G55/G48/G47/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G29/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G47/G48/G56/G4C/G4A/G51/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G45/G48/G4A/G4C/G51/G51/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G56/G58/G45/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G47/G4C/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03 /G17/G1C/G11/G1A/G13/G03 /G50/G50/G03 /G0B/G56/G48/G48/G03 /G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G14/G0C/G11/G03 /G29/G30 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G56/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G1A/G15 × /G14/G16/G11/G13/G1B/G03 /G50/G50/G15/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G56/G4B/G52/G55/G57/G10/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4C/G57/G48/G47 /G44/G57/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G52/G51/G48/G03/G48/G51/G47/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G47/G03/G57/G52/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G5C/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G45/G48/G44/G50/G03/G53/G4C/G53/G48/G56 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G47/G4C/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03 /G16/G17/G11/G13/G15/G03 /G50/G50/G11/G03 /G24/G03 /G56/G4B/G52/G55/G57/G10/G46/G4C/G55/G46/G58/G4C/G57/G56/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G56/G57/G03 /G52/G49 /G46/G5C/G4F/G4C/G51/G47/G55/G4C/G46/G44/G4F/G03 /G56/G58/G55/G49/G44/G46/G48/G56/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G47/G4C/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03 /G17/G15/G11/G1A/G17/G03 /G50/G50/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G57/G5A/G52 /G53/G4F/G44/G51/G48/G03 /G56/G58/G55/G49/G44/G46/G48/G56/G03 /G57/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G51/G57/G4C/G44/G4F/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G4F/G44/G57/G57/G48/G55/G03 /G0B/G56/G48/G48/G03 /G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G15/G0C/G11/G03 /G27/G58/G55/G4C/G51/G4A /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G44/G4F/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G47/G52/G51/G48/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G52/G45/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G47/G48/G56/G4C/G55/G48/G47/G03 /G59/G44/G4F/G58/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G0F /G5A/G48/G03 /G46/G4B/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G47/G03 /G44/G51/G03 /G44/G51/G4A/G4F/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G53/G4F/G44/G51/G48/G03 /G56/G58/G55/G49/G44/G46/G48/G56/G03 /G44/G51/G47 /G53/G52/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G29/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G3D /G2F/G26 /G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G56/G48 /G46/G44/G4F/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G48/G47/G03/G44/G57/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G16/G11 /G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G14/G1D/G03/G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03/G36/G10/G45/G44/G51/G47/G03/G57/G48/G56/G57/G03/G50/G52/G47/G58/G4F/G48/G11/G14/G0F/G15/G0F/G16/G10/G2B/G32/G30 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G56/G1E/G03/G17/G0F/G18/G10/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G1E/G03/G19/G10/G29/G30/G03/G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G11 LMWYZ +X ZLC XY +Zα /G44 /G45 /G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G15/G1D/G03/G29/G30/G03/G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G2B/G32/G30/G03/G47/G44/G50/G53/G48/G55 /G2C/G57/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G4E/G51/G52/G5A/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G44/G57/G03 /G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03 /G56/G46/G44/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G47/G52/G48/G56/G03 /G51/G52/G57/G03 /G44/G49/G49/G48/G46/G57/G03 /G52/G51 /G48/G5B/G57/G48/G55/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G54/G58/G44/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G03 /G49/G44/G46/G57/G52/G55/G03 /G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G46/G44/G56/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G15 × /G1A/G10/G46/G48/G4F/G4F/G56/G03 /G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G5C /G0B/G44/G51/G47/G03 /G44/G4F/G56/G52/G03 /G17/G5B/G1A/G03 /G46/G48/G4F/G4F/G56/G0C/G03 /G4C/G57/G03 /G50/G58/G56/G57/G03 /G45/G48/G03 /G48/G54/G58/G44/G4F/G03 /G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G03 /G20/G16/G11/G16/G19× /G14/G13/G19/G03 /G3E/G16/G40/G11 /G2C/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G44/G56/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G58/G56/G48/G47/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G46/G44/G4F/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G4F/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G46/G4C/G56/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G52/G49 /G52/G51/G48/G03 /G46/G48/G4F/G4F/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G47/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G03 /G50/G58/G56/G57/G03 /G45/G48 /G15/G17/G13/G13/G13/G13/G1140 50 60 70 8001x1062x1063x1064x1065x106 Coupler position (ZLC), mm 18 25 30 35 40Qext α, grad /G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G16/G1D/G03/G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G03/G59/G56/G11/G03/G3D /G2F/G26 /G03/G44/G51/G47/G03α /G29/G52/G55/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G5A/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G47/G48/G55/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G56 /G52/G49/G03 /G17/G19/G5B/G14/G15/G03 /G50/G50/G15/G03 /G46/G55/G52/G56/G56/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G47/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48 /G47/G4C/G44/G50/G48/G57/G48/G55/G03/G17/G1C/G11/G1A/G13/G03/G50/G50/G03/G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G03/G44/G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G03/G45/G48/G44/G50/G03/G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03/G44/G5B/G4C/G56 /G0B/G56/G48/G48/G03 /G14/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G14/G0C/G11/G03 /G27/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G56/G03 /G48/G5B/G46/G4C/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G5C /G46/G55/G48/G44/G57/G48/G56/G03 /G2B /G14/G14 /G10/G4F/G4C/G4E/G48/G03 /G49/G4C/G48/G4F/G47/G56/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G56/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G51/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G51/G4A /G56/G58/G45/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11/G03 /G29/G52/G55/G03 /G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03 /G2B /G5D/G50/G44/G5B/G03 /G44/G51/G47 /G2Bϕ /G50/G44/G5B/G03 /G46/G52/G50/G53/G52/G51/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G50/G52/G55/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G51/G03 /G14/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G5A/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03 /G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G5A/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G56/G4C/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G48/G46/G57/G44/G51/G4A/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03 /G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4A/G58/G4C/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G50/G58/G56/G57/G03 /G45/G48 /G52/G55/G4C/G48/G51/G57/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G44/G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G11/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G56/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G44/G03 /G56/G57/G55/G52/G51/G4A/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G56/G0F/G03 /G53/G55/G52/G59/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G56/G57/G55/G52/G51/G4A /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G51/G52/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G49/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F /G50/G52/G47/G48/G03/G44/G51/G47/G03/G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03/G50/G52/G51/G52/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G56/G11 /G25/G58/G57/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G4C/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G03 /G4C/G57/G03 /G4C/G56 /G47/G4C/G49/G49/G4C/G46/G58/G4F/G57/G03/G57/G52/G03/G4C/G51/G56/G57/G44/G4F/G4F/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G45/G48/G57/G5A/G48/G48/G51/G03 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G0F/G03 /G45/G48/G46/G44/G58/G56/G48 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G56/G4B/G52/G55/G57/G48/G55/G03 /G57/G4B/G44/G51/G03 /G5A/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G5A/G44/G4F/G4F/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G55/G48/G49/G52/G55/G48 /G5A/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G47/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G58/G56/G48/G03 /G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4A/G58/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G57/G55/G44/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G52/G55/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G52/G49 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G55/G48/G46/G57/G44/G51/G4A/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03 /G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4A/G58/G4C/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G47/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G17/G19/G5B/G14/G13/G03 /G50/G50/G15 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56/G03 /G55/G52/G57/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G45/G5C/G03 /G56/G52/G50/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G4A/G4F/G48/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G53/G48/G46/G57/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03/G44/G5B/G4C/G56/G03/G0B/G56/G48/G48/G03/G15/G03/G44/G57/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G14/G0C/G11 /G16/G03/G03/G37/G2B/G28/G03/G2B/G2C/G2A/G2B/G03/G32/G35/G27/G28/G35/G03/G30/G32/G27/G28/G36 /G2C/G31/G39/G28/G36/G37/G2C/G2A/G24/G37/G2C/G32/G31/G36 /G2C/G51/G03 /G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G57/G55/G4C/G46/G57/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G50/G58/G4F/G57/G4C/G10/G45/G58/G51/G46/G4B/G03 /G53/G4B/G48/G51/G52/G50/G48/G51/G44/G03 /G47/G58/G48/G03 /G57/G52 /G5A/G44/G4E/G48/G49/G4C/G48/G4F/G47/G56/G0F/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G4B/G4C/G4A/G4B/G48/G55/G03 /G52/G55/G47/G48/G55/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03 /G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G5C /G50/G58/G56/G57/G03 /G45/G48/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G48/G47/G03 /G47/G52/G5A/G51/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G48/G55/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G03 /G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G03 /G4F/G48/G59/G48/G4F/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G14/G13/G17/G03 /G10 /G14/G13/G18/G11/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G56/G48/G03/G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G03/G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G47/G03/G4C/G51/G03 /G36/G10/G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03 /G45/G44/G51/G47/G03 /G50/G58/G56/G57/G03 /G45/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G56/G44/G50/G48/G03/G44/G56/G03/G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G03/G4C/G51/G03/G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03/G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03/G45/G44/G51/G47/G11 /G3A/G48/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G47/G48/G57/G48/G55/G50/G4C/G51/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G47/G4C/G49/G49/G48/G55/G48/G51/G57/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G2B/G32/G30 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G58/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G54/G58/G44/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G03 /G49/G44/G46/G57/G52/G55/G03 /G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G52/G58/G57/G03 /G2B/G32/G30 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G34 /G14/G0F/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G34 /G15/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G48/G5B/G57/G48/G55/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G34/G10 /G49/G44/G46/G57/G52/G55/G03/G50/G44/G5C/G03/G45/G48/G03/G46/G44/G4F/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03/G51/G52/G5A/G03/G49/G55/G52/G50 /G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G20/G34 /G14/G34 /G15/G12/G0B/G34 /G14/G03/G10/G03/G34 /G15/G0C /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G50/G48/G44/G56/G58/G55/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03 /G58/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G47/G03 /G53/G58/G4F/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A /G57/G48/G46/G4B/G51/G4C/G54/G58/G48/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G44/G4F/G4F/G03 /G57/G4B/G55/G48/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G56/G03 /G44/G55/G48/G03 /G56/G58/G50/G50/G44/G55/G4C/G5D/G48/G47/G03 /G4C/G51 /G37/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G03 /G14/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G37/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G03 /G15/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G44/G56/G57/G48/G55/G4C/G56/G4E/G03 /G0D/G03 /G50/G44/G55/G4E/G56/G03 /G57/G4B/G52/G56/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G56/G0F /G49/G52/G55/G03/G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B/G03/G34 /G14/G20/G34 /G15/G11/G03/G27/G44/G56/G4B/G03/G47/G48/G56/G4C/G4A/G51/G44/G57/G48/G56/G03/G44/G45/G56/G48/G51/G46/G48/G03/G52/G49/G03/G48/G5B/G46/G4C/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G44/G57 /G57/G4B/G48/G03/G44/G53/G53/G55/G52/G53/G55/G4C/G44/G57/G48/G03/G2B/G32/G30/G03/G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G46/G48/G11 /G17/G03/G03/G35/G3A/G2A/G03/G2B/G32/G30/G03/G26/G32/G38/G33/G2F/G28/G35/G36/G03/G2C/G31/G03/G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24 /G26/G35/G3C/G32/G36/G37/G24/G37 /G3A/G48/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G47/G48/G55/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G53/G52/G56/G56/G4C/G45/G4C/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G44/G55/G55/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03 /G46/G55/G5C/G52/G56/G57/G44/G57/G03 [/G17]/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G55/G48/G48/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G2B/G32/G30 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G56/G03 /G44/G55/G48/G03 /G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G51/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G17/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G4C/G56/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G56/G4C/G56/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G5A/G52 /G14/G14/G13× /G15/G13/G50/G50/G15/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G56/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G56/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G1A/G13 × /G15/G13/G50/G50/G15 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G50/G52/G51/G52/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G52/G51/G48/G56/G11/G03 /G37/G52/G03 /G47/G48/G46/G55/G48/G44/G56/G48/G03 /G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G4C/G51/G44/G4F /G47/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G5A/G48/G03 /G58/G56/G48/G03 /G57/G44/G53/G48/G55/G48/G47/G03 /G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4A/G58/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G57/G55/G44/G51/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G49/G55/G52/G50 /G14/G14/G13/G50/G50/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G1C/G18/G50/G50/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G49/G55/G52/G50/G03 /G15/G13/G50/G50/G03 /G57/G52/G03 /G14/G13/G50/G50/G11/G03 /G24/G4F/G4F /G57/G55/G44/G51/G56/G50/G4C/G56/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G1A/G13/G50/G50/G03 /G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G4C/G51/G44/G4F /G53/G52/G56/G4C/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G14/G14/G13/G5B/G15/G13/G50/G50/G15/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G5A/G44/G56/G03 /G46/G4B/G52/G56/G48/G51/G03 /G47/G58/G48/G03 /G57/G52 /G49/G52/G4F/G4F/G52/G5A/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G55/G48/G44/G56/G52/G51/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G4F/G52/G5A/G48/G56/G57/G03 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G48/G5B/G46/G4C/G57/G48/G56/G03 /G2B /G14/G14 /G10 /G4F/G4C/G4E/G48/G03 /G48/G4F/G48/G46/G57/G55/G52/G50/G44/G4A/G51/G48/G57/G4C/G46/G03 /G49/G4C/G48/G4F/G47/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G57/G58/G45/G48/G11/G03 /G24/G57/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G4C/G48/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G56/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G56/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G55/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G03 /G2B/G5D/G12/G2B ϕ /G03 /G20/G03 /G15/G11/G18/G03 /G10/G03 /G19/G11/G18/G11 /G37/G4B/G58/G56/G03 /G2B/G5D/G03 /G46/G52/G50/G53/G52/G51/G48/G51/G57/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G50/G44/G4A/G51/G48/G57/G4C/G46/G03 /G49/G4C/G48/G4F/G47/G03 /G53/G55/G52/G59/G4C/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G56/G57/G55/G52/G51/G4A /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4F/G52/G5A/G48/G56/G57/G03/G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03/G2B/G32/G30/G56/G03/G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03/G2B /G14/G13 /G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G35/G3A/G2A /G03/G03/G03/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G17/G03 /G56/G4B/G52/G5A/G56/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G56/G03 /G4F/G52/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G55/G5C/G52/G56/G57/G44/G57/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G4C/G51/G4C/G57/G4C/G44/G4F /G53/G44/G55/G57/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G48/G44/G46/G4B/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G1C/G13/G03 /G50/G50/G03 /G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G03 /G0B/G49/G55/G52/G50/G03 /G45/G48/G44/G50/G03 /G53/G4C/G53/G48/G03 /G57/G58/G45/G48 /G57/G52 /G49/G4F/G44/G51/G4A/G48/G0C/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G50/G44/G47/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G31/G45/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G47/G58/G46/G57/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G0B/G15/G2E/G0C/G11 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G49/G4C/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G53/G44/G55/G57/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G48/G44/G46/G4B/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G50/G44/G47/G48/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G56/G57/G44/G4C/G51/G4F/G48/G56/G56/G03 /G56/G57/G48/G48/G4F /G46/G52/G59/G48/G55/G48/G47/G03/G45/G5C/G03/G46/G52/G53/G53/G48/G55/G11/G03/G37/G4B/G48/G03/G5A/G44/G4F/G4F/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G46/G4E/G51/G48/G56/G56/G03/G52/G49/G03/G4F/G44/G57/G57/G48/G55/G03/G53/G44/G55/G57/G03/G48/G54/G58/G44/G4F/G56 /G13/G11/G15/G03 /G50/G50/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G4B/G44/G56/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G44/G45/G52/G58/G57/G03 /G14/G03 /G50/G11/G03 /G37/G4B/G48/G56/G48 /G5A/G44/G59/G48/G4A/G58/G4C/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G44/G55/G48/G03 /G57/G48/G55/G50/G4C/G51/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G45/G5C/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G50/G44/G57/G46/G4B/G48/G47/G03 /G4F/G52/G44/G47/G56/G0F/G03 /G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03/G1A/G13/G2E/G03/G57/G48/G50/G53/G48/G55/G44/G57/G58/G55/G48/G11 /G24/G51/G52/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03 /G59/G44/G55/G4C/G44/G51/G57/G03 /G4B/G44/G56/G03 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G56/G03 /G4B/G44/G59/G48/G03 /G4C/G57/G56 /G35/G3A/G2A/G56/G03 /G55/G52/G57/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G57/G4B/G55/G52/G58/G4A/G4B/G03 /G17/G18/G10/G19/G13/G13/G11/G03 /G2C/G57/G03 /G55/G48/G47/G58/G46/G48/G56/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G4C/G51/G44/G4F /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G56/G4C/G5D/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G47/G03 /G53/G48/G55/G50/G4C/G57/G56/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G45/G52/G57/G4B/G03 /G50/G52/G51/G52/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G44/G51/G47 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G56/G03 /G4C/G51/G46/G4F/G58/G47/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G49/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G11/G03 /G37/G52/G03 /G55/G48/G47/G58/G46/G48/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G49/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G0F/G03 /G5A/G48/G03 /G58/G56/G48/G47/G03 /G51/G44/G55/G55/G52/G5A /G49/G55/G48/G54/G58/G48/G51/G46/G5C/G03 /G45/G44/G51/G47/G03 /G55/G48/G4D/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G49/G4C/G4F/G57/G48/G55/G03 /G57/G58/G51/G48/G47/G03 /G52/G51/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G52/G51/G44/G51/G46/G48/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B /G49/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G03/G49/G4C/G48/G4F/G47/G56/G11 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G44/G4F/G46/G58/G4F/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G55/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G4B/G48/G44/G57/G03 /G4F/G52/G44/G47/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G56/G48/G03 /G57/G5A/G52 /G59/G44/G55/G4C/G44/G51/G57/G56/G03/G44/G55/G48/G03/G53/G55/G48/G56/G48/G51/G57/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G37/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G03/G16/G11 /G18/G03/G03/G26/G32/G31/G26/G2F/G38/G36/G2C/G32/G31 /G37/G4B/G48/G03 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G4F/G52/G51/G4A/G4C/G57/G58/G47/G4C/G51/G44/G4F/G03 /G56/G4F/G52/G57/G56 /G53/G55/G52/G59/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G55/G44/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03 /G56/G57/G55/G52/G51/G4A/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G51/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G47/G4C/G53/G52/G4F/G48/G03 /G50/G52/G47/G48/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48 /G56/G58/G45/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G5C/G11/G03/G25/G48/G56/G4C/G47/G48/G56/G03/G57/G4B/G4C/G56/G03/G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03/G47/G52/G48/G56/G03/G51/G52/G57/G03/G51/G48/G48/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G55/G48/G4D/G48/G46/G57/G4C/G52/G51 /G49/G4C/G4F/G57/G48/G55/G0F/G03 /G5A/G4B/G4C/G46/G4B/G03 /G4C/G56/G03 /G55/G48/G54/G58/G4C/G55/G48/G47/G03 /G45/G5C/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G46/G52/G44/G5B/G4C/G44/G4F/G03 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G57/G52 /G44/G59/G52/G4C/G47/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G52/G49/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G49/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G11 /G19/G03/G03/G35/G28/G29/G28/G35/G28/G31/G26/G28/G36 /G3E/G14/G40 /G26/G52/G51/G46/G48/G53/G57/G58/G44/G4F/G03/G27/G48/G56/G4C/G4A/G51/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G44/G03 /G18/G13/G13/G03 /G2A/G48/G39/G03 /G48/G0E/G48/G10/G03 /G2F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03 /G26/G52/G4F/G4F/G4C/G47/G48/G55 /G5A/G4C/G57/G4B/G03 /G2C/G51/G57/G48/G4A/G55/G44/G57/G48/G47/G03 /G3B/G10/G55/G44/G5C/G03 /G2F/G44/G56/G48/G55/G03 /G29/G44/G46/G4C/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G0F/G03 /G27/G28/G36/G3C/G03 /G14/G1C/G1C/G1A/G10 /G13/G17/G1B/G0F/G03/G28/G26/G29/G24/G03/G14/G1C/G1C/G1A/G10/G14/G1B/G15/G0F/G03/G59/G52/G4F/G11/G14 /G3E/G15/G40 /G31/G11/G33/G11/G36/G52/G45/G48/G51/G4C/G51/G03 /G48/G57/G03 /G44/G4F/G4F/G03 /GB3/G36/G52/G50/G48/G03 /G35/G48/G56/G58/G4F/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G2C/G51/G59/G48/G56/G57/G4C/G4A/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G03 /G44 /G2B/G32/G30/G03 /G47/G44/G50/G53/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03 /G26/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G5C/G03 /G30/G52/G47/G48/G4F/G03 /G38/G56/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G44 /G35/G48/G46/G57/G44/G51/G4A/G58/G4F/G44/G55/G03 /G3A/G44/G59/G48/G4A/G58/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G26/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/GB4/G0F/G03 /G39/G2C/G2C/G2C/G03 /G3A/G52/G55/G4E/G56/G4B/G52/G53 /G2F/G4C/G51/G48/G44/G55/G03/G26/G52/G4F/G4F/G4C/G47/G48/G55/G03/G0B/G2F/G26/GB6/G1C/G1C/G0C/G11 /G3E/G16/G40 /G2D/G11/G25/G52/G56/G57/G48/G55/G0F/G03 /G30/G11/G27/G52/G4B/G4F/G58/G56/G0F/G03 /G39/G11/G2E/G44/G4F/G4D/G58/G5D/G4B/G51/G5C/G03 /G44/G57/G03 /G44/G4F/G4F/G11/G03 /G35/G48/G46/G57/G44/G51/G4A/G58/G4F/G44/G55 /G3A/G44/G59/G48/G4A/G58/G4C/G47/G48/G03 /G26/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03 /G49/G52/G55/G03 /G57/G5A/G52/G03 /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03 /G36/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G44/G59/G4C/G57/G4C/G48/G56/G11 /G27/G28/G36/G3C/G0F/G03/G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G10/G1C/G1C/G10/G13/G14/G0F/G03/G14/G1C/G1C/G1C/G11 /G3E/G17/G40 /G26/G11/G33/G44/G4A/G44/G51/G4C/G03 /G48/G57/G03 /G44/G4F/G4F/G03 /GB3/G29/G58/G55/G57/G4B/G48/G55/G03 /G4C/G50/G53/G55/G52/G59/G48/G50/G48/G51/G57/G56/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24 /G57/G48/G56/G57/G03 /G49/G44/G46/G4C/G4F/G4C/G57/G5C/G03 /G46/G55/G5C/G52/G56/G57/G44/G57/G03 /G4C/G51/G03 /G59/G4C/G48/G5A/G03 /G52/G49/G03 /G57/G4B/G48/G03 /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G03 /G46/G52/G4F/G4F/G4C/G47/G48/G55/GB4 /G26/G55/G5C/G52/G4A/G48/G51/G4C/G46/G03 /G48/G51/G4A/G4C/G51/G48/G48/G55/G4C/G51/G4A/G03 /G46/G52/G51/G49/G48/G55/G48/G51/G46/G48/G0F/G03 /G26/G44/G51/G44/G47/G44/G0F/G03 /G2D/G58/G4F/G5C/G03 /G14/G15/G10 /G14/G19/G0F/G03/G14/G1C/G1C/G1C/G11/G37/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G03/G14/G11/G03/G26/G52/G50/G53/G44/G55/G4C/G56/G52/G51/G03/G35/G3A/G2A/G03/G2B/G32/G30/G03/G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G56 /G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G0F/G14/G13/G16 Frequency, MHzHOM coupler type./G2B/G32/G30/G30/G52/G47/G48/G4F /G37/G28/G36/G2F/G24/G34 /G13 /G5B/G14/G13 /G16 ⊥ /G44/G5B/G45/G20/G17/G19/G5B/G14/G15/G50/G50 /G2C/G2C /G44/G5B/G45/G20/G17/G19/G5B/G14/G15/G03/G50/G50 /G56/G48/G48/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G18 ⁄⁄ /G44/G5B/G45/G20/G17/G19/G5B/G14/G13/G50/G50 /G56/G48/G48/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G15 /G16/G1A/G17/G17/G11/G17/G1A /G14/G19/G16/G15/G11/G1C/G13 /G1C/G11/G19 /G17/G18/G14 /G14/G1A/G11/G18 /G17/G1B /G16/G1A/G1B/G17/G11/G13/G1A /G14/G19/G18/G13/G11/G15/G13 /G1B/G11/G14 /G0D /G15/G11/G13 /G14/G1B /G16/G1B/G17/G13/G11/G14/G16 /G14/G19/G1A/G17/G11/G19/G18 /G14/G15/G11/G1B /G15/G19/G13 /G10 /G14/G16/G11/G19 /G16/G1B/G17/G16/G11/G14/G13 /G14/G19/G1A/G18/G11/G1C/G17 /G1A/G11/G13 /G0D /G14/G11/G1A/G18 /G1C/G11/G1C /G16/G1C/G14/G1B/G11/G18/G1B /G14/G1A/G13/G1B/G11/G1B/G1C /G0D /G10 /G10 /G16/G1C/G15/G15/G11/G1B/G17 /G14/G1A/G14/G13/G11/G1A/G18 /G16/G19/G11/G13 /G18/G11/G17/G17 /G18/G11/G17/G17 /G17/G13/G13/G13/G11/G19/G13 /G14/G1A/G17/G17/G11/G19/G15 /G14/G13/G11/G15 /G0D /G10 /G13/G11/G1A/G17 /G17/G13/G13/G1C/G11/G15/G14 /G14/G1A/G17/G1B/G11/G16/G1A /G14/G14/G11/G18 /G15/G13/G1C /G16/G15/G11/G19 /G1A/G11/G1C /G17/G13/G1A/G17/G11/G1A/G15 /G14/G1A/G1A/G19/G11/G1C/G17 /G14/G13/G11/G14 /G0D /G10 /G13/G11/G19/G2B /G14/G14/G14 /G17/G13/G1B/G1C/G11/G1B/G18 /G14/G1A/G1B/G16/G11/G18/G17 /G14/G14/G11/G19 /G14/G1B/G13 /G14/G16/G11/G1B /G18/G11/G13 /G17/G14/G15/G1A/G11/G13/G1A /G14/G1A/G1C/G1C/G11/G1A/G1A /G14/G13/G11/G15 /G14/G13/G18 /G10 /G16/G11/G14 /G17/G14/G16/G14/G11/G1A/G1A /G14/G1B/G13/G14/G11/G1C/G15 /G1C/G11/G1C /G0D /G14/G1A/G11/G1A /G14/G18/G11/G1C /G17/G15/G15/G1C/G11/G17/G1B /G14/G1B/G17/G16/G11/G19/G13 /G14/G19/G11/G1C /G0D /G10 /G14/G11/G16 /G17/G15/G16/G16/G11/G18/G15 /G14/G1B/G17/G18/G11/G1C/G1C /G14/G19/G11/G16 /G0D /G1A/G11/G19 /G14/G1C/G11/G19 /G17/G15/G19/G1C/G11/G16/G1A /G14/G1B/G19/G14/G11/G18/G1C /G14/G18/G11/G1A /G0D /G10 /G14/G11/G14 /G17/G15/G1A/G16/G11/G1B/G16 /G14/G1B/G19/G16/G11/G19/G14 /G14/G15/G11/G15 /G0D /G15/G13/G11/G14 /G16/G1A/G11/G17 /G17/G15/G1C/G1B/G11/G18/G18 /G14/G1B/G1A/G17/G11/G17/G13 /G14/G19/G11/G1A /G0D /G10 /G14/G18/G11/G16 /G17/G16/G13/G15/G11/G13/G16 /G14/G1B/G1A/G18/G11/G1C/G15 /G14/G19/G11/G1B /G0D /G16/G1B/G11/G19 /G14/G15/G17 /G17/G16/G14/G1A/G11/G14/G14 /G14/G1B/G1B/G15/G11/G19/G13 /G14/G17/G11/G18 /G0D /G15/G11/G14 /G15/G11/G1C /G17/G16/G14/G1C/G11/G17/G19 /G14/G1B/G1B/G16/G11/G19/G13 /G14/G18/G11/G1A /G0D /G15/G11/G14 /G15/G1C/G11/G1C /G17/G16/G15/G1A/G11/G16/G16 /G14/G1B/G1B/G1A/G11/G16/G15 /G14/G19/G11/G1A /G0D /G16/G11/G14 /G17/G11/G14 /G17/G16/G16/G13/G11/G1A/G15 /G14/G1B/G1B/G1B/G11/G18/G1B /G14/G17/G11/G1A /G0D /G10 /G0D/G3F /G14/G14/G13 /G17/G16/G16/G15/G11/G13/G13 /G14/G1B/G1B/G1C/G11/G14/G1B /G14/G17/G11/G18 /G1C/G13/G11/G19 /G17/G11/G1C /G14/G13/G11/G1B/G37/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G03/G15/G11/G03/G26/G52/G50/G53/G44/G55/G4C/G56/G52/G51/G03/G35/G3A/G2A/G03/G2B/G32/G30/G03/G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G56/G03/G49/G52/G55/G03/G28 /G13/G14/G14 /G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G5F/G03/G5F /G44/G5B/G45/G20 /G17/G19/G5B/G14/G13/G03/G50/G50 /G56/G48/G48/G03/G29/G4C/G4A/G11/G03/G18 ⊥ /G44/G5B/G45/G20 /G15/G1B/G5B/G14/G15/G11/G18/G03/G50/G50 /G5F/G03/G5F/G0E⊥ /G0E/G5F/G03/G5F /G5F/G03/G5F/G10/G44/G5B/G45/G20 /G17/G19/G5B/G14/G15/G03/G50/G50 ⊥ /G10/G44/G5B/G45/G20 /G15/G1B/G5B/G14/G15/G11/G18/G03/G50/G50/G29/G0F /G03/G46 /G2B/G5D/G34 /G13 /G5B/G14/G13/G16 /G34 /G2F /G5B/G14/G13 /G16/G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G5B/G14/G13/G16/G34 /G2F /G5B/G14/G13/G16/G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G5B/G14/G13/G16/G34 /G2F /G5B/G14/G13/G16/G34 /G48/G5B/G57 /G5B/G14/G13/G16 /G18/G17/G1B/G14/G11/G1B/G16 /G14/G18/G11/G17 /G14/G17/G11/G18 /G15/G17/G1B/G11/G14 /G14/G15/G11/G1A /G1A/G15/G11/G17/G17 /G14/G17/G11/G1A /G16/G15/G16/G11/G17 /G18/G18/G13/G15/G11/G17/G13 /G18/G11/G14 /G17/G11/G1A /G18/G1C/G11/G1C /G17/G11/G1A/G18 /G19/G1C/G11/G15 /G17/G11/G1A /G18/G1C/G11/G1C/G15 /G18/G18/G13/G1C/G11/G1B/G15 /G14/G14/G11/G1C /G1B/G11/G1C /G16/G18/G11/G16 /G18/G11/G18/G18 /G14/G13/G11/G17 /G1B/G11/G1A /G16/G15/G11/G16/G18 /G18/G18/G16/G1C/G11/G18/G13 /G1C/G11/G13 /G18/G11/G1C /G14/G1A/G11/G14/G16 /G16/G11/G1B/G18 /G19/G11/G1A/G16 /G17/G11/G1A/G16 /G1C/G11/G1C/G1A /G18/G18/G1A/G1A/G11/G15/G13 /G1C/G11/G1A /G17/G11/G19 /G1B/G11/G1A/G18 /G16/G11/G16/G18 /G18/G11/G14/G15 /G15/G11/G18/G16 /G16/G11/G17/G15 /G18/G18/G1C/G1C/G11/G1C/G16 /G14/G15/G11/G17 /G18/G11/G13 /G1B/G11/G16/G1B /G10 /G10 /G10 /G10 /G18/G19/G14/G1B/G11/G1A/G13 /G14/G14/G11/G15 /G16/G11/G17 /G17/G11/G1B/G1B /G15/G11/G18 /G16/G11/G15/G15 /G14/G11/G1A/G16 /G15/G11/G13/G18 /G18/G19/G16/G16/G11/G13/G13 /G14/G17/G11/G13 /G10 /G10 /G10 /G10 /G10 /G10 /G18/G19/G17/G16/G11/G1C/G13 /G14/G17/G11/G18 /G17/G11/G14 /G18/G11/G1A/G15 /G17/G11/G13 /G18/G11/G18/G15 /G14/G11/G1B/G19 /G15/G11/G14/G16 /G37/G44/G45/G4F/G48/G03/G16/G11/G03/G2B/G48/G44/G57/G03/G4F/G52/G44/G47/G4C/G51/G4A/G03/G52/G49/G03/G15/G2E/G03/G55/G48/G4A/G4C/G52/G51/G03/G53/G48/G55/G03/G17 × /G1A/G03/G46/G48/G4F/G4F/G56 /G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G58/G55/G48/G39/G48/G55/G56/G4C/G52/G51 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03/G47/G4C/G50/G48/G51/G56/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G0F /G44/G5B/G45/G5B/G57/G0F/G03/G50/G50/G15 /G31/G52/G51/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G46/G52/G51/G47/G58/G46/G57/G4C/G51/G4A /G35/G3A/G2A/G03/G4F/G48/G51/G4A/G57/G4B/G0F/G03/G50/G50 /G36/G57/G44/G57/G4C/G46/G03/G4F/G52/G56/G56/G48/G56/G03/G53/G48/G55/G03/G52/G51/G48 /G35/G3A/G2A/G03/G1A/G13→ /G15/G2E/G0F/G03/G50/G3A /G29/G58/G51/G47/G44/G50/G48/G51/G57/G44/G4F/G03/G50/G52/G47/G48/G03/G4F/G52/G56/G56/G48/G56 /G53/G48/G55/G03/G52/G51/G48/G03/G35/G3A/G2A/G0F/G03/G50/G3A /G31/G58/G50/G45/G48/G55/G03/G52/G49/G03/G35/G3A/G2A/G56 /G2F/G52/G56/G56/G48/G56/G03/G53/G48/G55/G03/G56/G58/G53/G48/G55/G56/G57/G55/G58/G46/G57/G58/G55/G48/G0F /G50/G3A /G14/G14/G13/G5B/G15/G13/G5B/G13/G11/G15 /G14/G13/G13/G13 /G14/G16 /G13 /G15/G5B/G17/G14/G1A/G13/G5B/G15/G13/G5B/G13/G11/G15 /G14/G13/G13/G13 /G1C /G15 /G14/G5B/G17/G14/G17/G1B /G15 /G14/G14/G13/G5B/G15/G13/G5B/G13/G11/G15 /G14/G13/G13/G13 /G14/G16 /G17 /G15/G5B/G18 /G14/G1A/G13 /G25/G10 /G25 /G19 /G13 /G1A /G13/G24 /G24 /G16 /G13/G52/G1A /G13/G24 /G10 /G24/G25 /G25/G1C /G18 /G14 /G13 /G15 /G13 /G15 /G13/G14/G14 /G13 /G44 /G45 /G29/G4C/G4A/G58/G55/G48/G03/G17/G11/G03/G37/G4B/G55/G48/G48/G03/G35/G3A/G2A/G03/G2B/G32/G30/G03/G46/G52/G58/G53/G4F/G48/G55/G03/G4F/G52/G46/G44/G57/G4C/G52/G51/G56/G03/G4C/G51/G03/G57/G4B/G48/G03/G46/G55/G5C/G52/G56/G57/G44/G57/G11

arXiv:physics/0008002v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Aug 2000Circular photogalvanic effect induced by monopolar spin ori entation in p-GaAs/AlGaAs MQW S.D. Ganichev1,2, E.L. Ivchenko2, H. Ketterl1, L.E. Vorobjev3and W. Prettl1 1Institut f¨ ur Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik, Unive rsit¨ at Regensburg 93040 Regensburg, Germany 2A.F. Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute, Russian Academy of Sci. 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia 3St. Petersburg State Technical University, 195251 St. Pete rsburg, Russia The circular photogalvanic effect (CPGE) has been ob- served in (100)-oriented p-GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells at normal incidence of far-infrared radiation. It is shown tha t monopolar optical spin orientation of free carriers causes an electric current which reverses its direction upon changin g from left to right circularly polarized radiation. CPGE at n or- mal incidence and the occurence of the linear photogalvanic effect indicate a reduced point symmetry of studied multi- layered heterostructures. As proposed, CPGE can be utilize d to investigate separately spin polarization of electrons a nd holes and the symmetry of quantum wells. Spin polarization and spin relaxation in semicon- ductors are the subject of intensive studies of spin- polarized electron transport aimed at the development of spinotronic devices like a spin transistor [1,2]. So far, photo-induced spin polarization has been achieved by in- terband optical absorption of circularly polarized light with the photogeneration of spin-polarized electrons and holes [3–5]. Here we report on the first observation of the circular photogalvanic effect (CPGE) under intersubband transi- tions in multiple-quantum-well (MQW) structures. Phe- nomenologically, the effect is a transfer of angular mo- menta of circularly polarized photons into the directed movement of free carriers, electrons or holes, and there- fore depends on the symmetry of the medium. Micro- scopically, it arises due to optical spin orientation of hol es in MQWs and asymmetric spin-dependent scattering of spin-polarized carriers by interface imperfections follo wed by an appearance of an electric current. The two states of light circular polarization σ±result in different spin orientations and, thus, in electric photocurrents of oppo- site directions. The CPGE has been observed on p-doped (001)-oriented MQWs at normal incidence of the circu- larly polarized far-infrared (FIR) laser pulses. In contra st to the case of interband optical excitation, under inter- subband transitions only one kind of carriers is involved leading to a monopolar spin orientation. The observed effect can be utilized to investigate spin polarization of extrinsic free carriers, and provides a simple method to analyze the reduced point symmetry of the medium un-der study, here MQWs. The experiments have been carried out on p- GaAs/AlGaAs (001)-MOCVD grown quantum well (QW) structures with 400 undoped wells of 20 nm width separated by 10 nm wide doped barriers. Different sam- ples of 5 ×5mm2size with hole densities in the QWs vary- ing from 2 ·1011cm−2to 2·1012cm−2have been inves- tigated. Ohmic contacts to the QWs were formed by depositing Ti and Au with subsequent tempering. Two pairs of point contacts along two perpendicular connect- ing lines have been prepared, parallel to [1 ¯10] and [110] (see inset Fig. 1). Two additional pairs of ohmic con- tacts have been formed in the corners of the sample cor- responding to the ∝angbracketleft100∝angbracketrightcrystallographic directions. A high power pulsed far-infrared molecular laser pumped by a TEA-CO 2laser has been used as a radiation source delivering 100ns pulses with the intensity Iup to 1MW/cm2. NH 3has been used as a FIR laser medium yielding strong single-line linearly-polarized emission s at wavelengths λ= 76µm, 90 µm, and 148 µm [7,8]. The photon energies of the laser lines correspond to transi- tions between size-quantization subbands of GaAs QWs [6]. The linearly-polarized laser light could be modified to a circularly-polarized radiation by applying crystalli ne quartz λ/4–plates. While irradiating the (001) GaAs QWs by normally in- cident circularly-polarized radiation (see inset in Fig. 1 ) a fast photocurrent signal, U12, has been observed in un- biased samples across one contact pair (contacts 1 & 2 in the inset). The signal follows the temporal structure of the laser pulse intensity. The photocurrent changes sign if the circular polarization is switched from σ+to σ−. Measurements of U12as a function of the degree of circular polarization Pcirc= sin 2 ϕ, where ϕis the angle between the optical axis of the λ/4-plate and the plane of polarization of the laser radiation, reveal that the pho- togalvanic current jis proportional to Pcirc(Fig. 1). In case of the linearly-polarized radiation corresponding to ϕ= 0 or 90◦the signal U12vanishes. The magnitude and the sign of the CPGE are practically unchanged with variation of the angle of incidence in the range of -40◦to +40◦. Heating the sample from 4.2 K to 300 K leads to a change of the sign of CPGE but the sin 2 ϕdependence is retained. In bulk GaAs substrate material no CPGE could be detected which gives evidence that the effect 1occurs in the MQWs. 0 45 90 135 180-4-2024 0 0 0 0 sin(2ϕ)∝p-GaAs/Al0.5Ga0.5As MQWs ps = 2 1012 cm-2, T = 4.2 K λ = 148 µm, I = 400 kW/cm2U12 / I ( 10-5 V/kW*cm2) ϕ FIG. 1. Photogalvanic voltage signal U12picked up across the contact pair 1-2 and normalized by the intensity Ias a function of phase angle ϕ. The inset bottom-right shows the geometry of sample, contacts and irradiation. The full line is fitted with one parameter after U12∝Pcirc(see first line in Eq. 3). The orientation of opposite lying contact pairs (1-2 and 3-4) with respect to crystallographic axes is discussed in the text. 0 45 90 135 180-2024 0 0 0 0U12 U34p-GaAs/Al0.5Ga0.5As MQWs ps = 2 1012 cm-2, T = 293 K λ = 148 µm, I = 1000 kW/cm2U / I ( 10-6 V/kW*cm2 ) ϕ FIG. 2. Photogalvanic voltage signal U(dots - U12, squares - U34) normalized by the intensity Ifor the two dif- ferent contact pairs with orthogonal connecting lines (see in- set) as a function of phase angle ϕ. The broken line and the full line are fitted after Eq. 3 as U12∝sin 2ϕand U34∝(χ++χ−cos22ϕ), respectively. Using the other pair of contacts (contacts 3 & 4 in the inset in Fig. 2) no photogalvanic signal dependent on the sign of Pcirccould be detected. This is demonstrated in Fig. 2 where the voltage U34is plotted as a function of the phase angle ϕtogether with U12. The signal U34is periodic in ϕwith the period being one half of that ofU12. The value and the sign of U34forσ+are the same like that for σ−(ϕ=±45◦). The measurements of the photogalvanic effect along ∝angbracketleft100∝angbracketrightcrystallographic directions show a sum of the projections on this direction of the photocurrents induced along [1 ¯10] and [110]. The photogalvanic current under study can be de- scribed by the following phenomenological expression [9] jλ=χλµν(EµE∗ ν+EνE∗ µ)/2 +γλµi(E×E∗)µ,(1) where Eis the complex amplitude of the electric field of the electromagnetic wave and i(E×E∗) =PcircE2 0q q, E0=|E|,qis the light wavevector. In a bulk crystal, λ=x, y, z , while in a MQW structure grown along the zdirection, say z∝bardbl[001], the index λruns only over the in-plane axes x∝bardbl[100], y∝bardbl[010] because the barriers pre- vent carriers from moving along the zaxis and, definitely, jz= 0. In bulk materials the photogalvanic effects under con- sideration arise in homogeneous samples under homoge- neous excitation due to an asymmetry of the interaction of free carriers with photons, phonons, static defects or other carriers in noncentrosymmetric media [9]. The pho- tocurrent given by the tensor χdescribes the so-called linear photogalvanic effect (LPGE) because it is usually observed under linearly polarized optical excitation. The circular photogalvanic effect (CPGE) described by the pseudotensor γcan be observed only under circularly polarized optical excitation. In an ideal (001)-grown MQW structure with the D 2d point symmetry or in a MQW structure with nonequiv- alent left and right interfaces yet retaining their local symmetry C 2v, a generation of the circular photocurrent under normal incidence is forbidden because the pseu- dovector component [ E×E∗]zand the vector components jx, jytransform according to nonequivalent irreducible representations of the group D 2dor C2v. Thus in order to explain the experimental data the symmetry of the structure should be reduced to the next possible point group which is Csand contains only two elements: the identity transformation and one mirror reflection, say in the plane (1 ¯10). In this case we obtain under normal incidence jx′=E2 0[γPcirc+χ1(ex′e∗ y′+ey′e∗ x′)], (2) jy′=E2 0[χ2|ex′|2+χ3|ey′|2], where eis the polarization unit vector of the light and γ, χ1, χ2andχ3are linearly independent coefficients which can depend on the light frequency and temper- ature. Instead of xandywe use the axes x′∝bardbl[1¯10], y′∝bardbl [110]. It follows then that the circular photocurrent is 2induced along x′, while the linear photocurrent induced by the light linearly polarized along x′ory′flows in the y′direction. For the light initially polarized along x′and transmitted through the λ/4 plate we have jx′=γE2 0sin2ϕ=γE2 0Pcirc, (3) jy′=E2 0(χ++χ−cos22ϕ) =E2 0(χ2−χ−P2 circ), where χ±= (χ2±χ3)/2. The CPGE described by γcan be related to an electric current in a system of free carri- ers with nonequilibrium spin-polarization [10]. The pos- sible microscopic mechanism is the spin-dependent scat- tering of optically oriented holes by asymmetric interface imperfections. The experimentally observed change of sign of the photogalvanic current upon heating the sam- ple from 4.2 K to room temperature may be caused by the change of scattering mechanism from impurity scat- tering to phonon assisted scattering. Note that, for ideal zinc-blende-based MQW structures grown along the prin- cipal axis [001], the CPGE is also possible but only under oblique incidence of irradiation. 0 45 90 135 180-4-20 0 0 0 0p-GaAs/Al0.5Ga0.5As MQWs ps = 2 1012 cm-2, T = 293 K λ = 148 µm, I = 300 kW/cm2U34 / I ( 10-6 V/kW*cm2 ) α FIG. 3. Photogalvanic voltage signal U34, in response to linear polarized radiation, picked up across the contact pair 3-4 and normalized by the intensity Ias a function of angle αbetween the electric field vector and the connect- ing line of contact pair 1-2 (see inset). Full line is fitted to U34∝[χ+−χ−cos 2(α+ 90◦)] where the same parameters χ+andχ−have been used as for fitting U34in Fig. 2. Comparison of Eq. (3) and Figs. 1,2 demonstrates a good agreement between the theory and the experimental data. In order to verify independently the validity of Eq. (2) for jy′we excited the sample by linearly-polarized light and measured the voltage U34as a function of the angle αbetween the plane of linear polarization and the axisx′. Note, that in this set-up α= 0 is equivalent toϕ=n90◦(nis integer 0 ,±1...) in the set-up with theλ/4 plate. Triangles in Fig. 3 present the measured dependence U34(α), the solid curve is calculated afterU34∝[χ+−χ−cos2(α+ 90◦)] which follows from the second line of equation (2). To obtain the curve in Fig. 3 the same parameters were used as for fitting U34in Fig. 2. The low symmetry C srequired to have nonzero γ andχi(i= 1,2,3) gives an evidence for the in-plane anisotropy showing that in the investigated MQWs (i) the [110] and [1 ¯10] crystallographic directions are differ- ent, and (ii) one of the reflection planes, (110) either (1¯10), is removed as a symmetry element making the cor- responding normal axis to be a polar one. The first con- clusion is valid for both the C2vandCspoint groups; the difference between the [110] and [1 ¯10] axes has been stud- ied by chemical etching [11] of GaAs (001) surfaces and by an observation of the in-plane anisotropy of the quan- tum Hall effect [12] and anisotropic exchange splitting of the excitonic levels (see [13] and references therein) in periodic heterostructures. Moreover, (001) faces of GaAs show trenches on the atomic level in one of the ∝angbracketleft110∝angbracketright directions [14]. Obviously these trenches proceed into MQWs forming interface islands, steps etc. and reduc- ing their symmetry. The conclusion (ii) is less obvious. It is worth to stress that, unlike conventional optical and transport phenomena, the CPGE unambiguously chooses between the C2vandCssymmetries. At present we can only guess why the available series of MQWs is charac- terized by the reduced symmetry. Photogalvanic studies of samples supplied from different sources are needed to come to a final conclusion. To summarize, it is shown that the optical orienta- tion of free carriers can be accompanied by their drift. Absorption of normally incident circularly-polarized FIR radiation in gyrotropic media induces a photocurrent which reverses the direction as the circular polarization is changed from right- to left-hand orientation. These observations reveal the reduced in-plane symmetry of GaAs-based (001)-grown MQWs and can be used as a simple method to detect and characterize asymmetries in heterostructures. The method is effective even at room temperature. The theoretical considerations show that the CPGE can be observed also in an ideal MQW of the symmetry D 2dif the incident radiation is obliquely inci- dent. The experiments presented here have been carried out in p-doped QWs but similar results are expected also forn-QWs. Financial support by the DFG and the RFFI are grate- fully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank H. v. Philipsborn for helpful discussions. [1] S. Datta, and B. Das, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665 (1990). [2] G. Prinz, Phys. Today 48, 58 (1995). [3]Optical orientation , F. Meier, and B.P. Zacharchenia, 3Eds. (Elsevier Science Publ., Amsterdam, 1984) [4] J.M. Kikkawa, and D.D. Awschalom, Nature 397, 139 (1999). [5] J.M. Kikawa, and D.D. Awschalom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4313 (1998). [6] L.E. Vorobjev, D.V. Donetskii, L.E. Golub, JETP Lett.63, 981 (1996) [7] S.D. Ganichev, W. Prettl, and I.N. Yassievich, review in Phys. Solid State 39, 1703 (1997). [8] S.D. Ganichev, Physica B 273-274 , 737 (1999). [9] E.L. Ivchenko and G.E. Pikus, Superlattices and Other Heterostructures. Symmetry and Optical Phenomena, Springer Series in Solid State Sciences, vol. 110, Springer - Verlag, 1995 ; second edition 1997; Ch. 10. [10] E.L. Ivchenko, Yu.B. Lyanda-Geller, and G.E. Pikus, Sov. Phys. JETP 73, 550, 1990) [11] S. Adachi, and K. Oe, J. Electrochem. Soc: solid state science 130, 2427 (1983). [12] M.P. Lilly, K.B. Cooper, J.P. Eisenstein, L.N. Pfeiffer , and K.W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 394 (1999). [13] R.I. Dzhioev, H.M. Gibbs, E.L. Ivchenko, G. Khitrova, V.L. Korenev, M.N. Tkachuk, and B.P. Zakharchenya, Phys. Rev. B 56, 13405 (1997). [14] R.E. Newnham Structure property relations , Springer, 1975. 4

arXiv:physics/0008003v1 [physics.ins-det] 2 Aug 2000Two Large-Area Anode-Pad MICROMEGAS Chambers as the basic elements of a Pre-Shower Detector L. Aphecetche, H. Delagrange, D. G. d’Enterria, M. Le Guay, X . Li∗, G. Mart´ ınez†, M.J. Mora, P. Pichot, D. Roy and Y. Schutz SUBATECH (Ecole des Mines de Nantes, IN2P3/CNRS, Universit´ e de Nant es ), BP 20722, 44307 Nantes Cedex 3, France Abstract The design of a detector based on MICROMEGAS (MICRO MEsh GAse ous Structure) technology is presented. Our detector is characterized by a large active area of 398 ×281 mm2, a pad read-out with 20 ×22 mm2segmentation, and an uniform amplification gap obtained by insulating spacers (100 µm high and 200 µm in diameter). The performances of several prototypes have been evaluated under irradiation w ith secondary beams of 2 GeV/c momentum charged pions and electrons. We consider such a det ector as the basic element for a pre-shower detector to equip the PHOton Spectrometer (PHO S) of the ALICE experiment. Its assets are modularity, small amount of material, robust ness and low cost. I. INTRODUCTION The main goal of experiments at relativistic heavy-ion coll iders, like RHIC at Brookhaven and LHC at CERN, is to produce and study, in the laboratory, th e primordial matter of the universe which is predicted to consist of a plasma of deco nfined quarks and gluons (QGP). Among the various considered probes and related obse rvables (strange hadrons, heavy mesons, di-electrons, etc.), direct photons will exp lore the partonic phase during the equilibration process, as well as the QGP phase itself [1–3] . In the ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment) experiment at CERN [4], direct photon s will be detected and identi- fied with PHOS (PHOton Spectrometer) [5]. PHOS is a highly seg mented electromagnetic calorimeter (EMCA) which will consist of 17280 lead-tungst ate (PbWO 4) crystals, associ- ated to a charged particle veto detector (CPV). Each crystal (2.2×2.2×18 cm3, 20 radiation lengths) is coupled to a PIN-diode associated to a low noise p re-amplifier. The PHOS spec- trometer will be positioned at the bottom of the ALICE magnet , 4.6 meters away from the interaction point. It will cover the pseudo-rapidity ra nge from -0.12 to 0.12 and the azimuthal-angle domain from 45◦to 135◦. Rejection of charged hadronic showers will be performed with the CPV detector, positioned in front of the P HOS crystals. Recent analyses of the direct photon production in heavy-io n collisions at SPS energies [2,3,6] have pointed out the limits of the photon identificat ion power resulting from two ∗Present address: China Institute of Atomic Energy, P.O. Box 275, 102413 Beijing, China. †Corresponding author: martinez@in2p3.fr 1kinds of contaminations: i) the showers induced by neutral h adrons (mainly nand ¯n), and ii) the overlap of showers in high multiplicity events. Thes e contaminations are expected to become much more severe at LHC energies. In order to properly minimize these effects, we have designed a pre-shower detector to be associated with PH OS. This detector noticeably improves the photon identification power and allows for a dir ect measurement of the elec- tromagnetic shower vertex. The PPSD (PHOS Pre-Shower Detec tor, Fig. 1) consists of two distinct MICROMEGAS (MICRO MEsh GAseous Structure) gas cou nters: the Charged Particle Veto (CPV) and the Photon Conversion (PC) chambers , sandwiching a passive Pb converter. Among the new micro-pattern detectors exploiting avalanch e multiplication in narrow gaps [9], MICROMEGAS technology [10] appears as a very promi sing option in terms of performances, robustness, reduced amount of material, and cost (see e.g. [11–16]). For our specific needs, we justify the choice of the MICROMEGAS techn ology with the following considerations: 1. It provides the modularity well suited to cover areas of a f ew squared meters. 2. It is mechanically robust and resistant to electrical dis charges. 3. The small lateral development of the electron cloud in the amplification gap, prevents from significant overlaps in high multiplicity events. 4. The small amount of material minimizes photon-conversio n and nuclear interactions within the detector. Using our PPSD design, the identification capabilities of PH OS will be improved as follows: 1. Muons will be identified as minimum ionizing particles (MI Ps) in the CPV, PC and EMCA detectors. 2. About half of the charged hadrons ( π+,π−, K+, K−, etc.) will be detected as MIPs in the CPV, the PC, and the calorimeter. The other half of charge d hadrons will develop a hadronic shower in the calorimeter. 3. Photons will be unambiguously identified by three feature s: the absence of a hit in the CPV, a hit in the PC detector, when the photon is converted into an e+−e−pair within the absorber, and an electromagnetic shower in the ca lorimeter. The identifi- cation efficiency will depend on the thickness of the passive c onverter. The optimal thickness results from a compromise between the photon iden tification efficiency of the PPSD and the photon energy resolution of the spectrometer. F rom simulations [7], we deduced that the best trade-off is achieved for a thickness equivalent to one radia- tion length. Additionally, from the hit position in the PC de tector, the shower vertex will be directly measured, providing information to resolv e the overlapping showers expected in high multiplicity events. 4. Neutral hadrons will trigger most of the time nor the CPV, n either the PC detector (the intermediate Pb passive converter represents only 5% o f the nuclear interaction length). 25. Electrons and positrons will be identified by a hit in the CP V and PC and by an electromagnetic shower developing in the EMCA. Additional improvement of the elec- tron and positron identification power could be achieved by c onsidering the deposited energy in the PC detector. In the present report, the performances of large-area anode -pad MICROMEGAS de- tectors, irradiated with a 2 GeV/c pion and electron beam, ar e presented in terms of pad response to MIP, gain in the amplification gap and detector effi ciency. In addition, we have studied the electrical discharge probability per ionizing particle as a function of the detector gain, in order to probe the reliability of this technology in large multiplicity experiments. Finally, we have studied the electron and pion response func tions of a pre-shower detector prototype. II. DESCRIPTION OF A LARGE-AREA ANODE-PAD MICROMEGAS CHAMBERS The MICROMEGAS technology [10,11] consists of an asymmetri c two-stage parallel- plate gas-detector. The first stage, a 3 mm thick conversion g ap, is separated from the 100µm thick amplification gap, by a micro-mesh foil resting on ins ulating spacers. The amplification gap is closed at the bottom by the pad anode surf ace. Such a configuration allows to establish simultaneously a very high electric fiel d in the amplification region ( ∼ 50 kV/cm) together with a low electric field in the drift regio n (∼2 kV/cm), by apply- ing suitable voltages between the three electrodes (cathod e-mesh-anode). When a charged particle traverses the conversion gap, it generates primar y electrons which are subsequently multiplied in the small amplification gap. The associated io n cloud is quickly collected on the micro-mesh layer generating a relatively fast signal, w hereas only a small part of the ion cloud penetrates into the conversion region. The amplified e lectron cloud is collected on the anode providing a fast electric signal. Based on this principle, we have developed several large-ar ea prototypes with pad read- out (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). The characteristics of the chambers a re the following: 1.Anode : The total area of the anode plane is 480 ×300 mm2, providing an active area of 398 ×281 mm2. The anode electrode consists of a 1.0 mm thick printed circu it board. Its inner surface is segmented in rectangular 20 ×22 mm2gilded copper pads, and the signal is collected on the other side through strips t o the connectors. The inter-pad width is 100 µm and the total number of pads is 256. Each pad is pierced by a conductive pine hole of 300 µm in diameter to allow for readout through the board. The rigidity of the board is obtained by sticking an addition al 3 mm thick board made of low X0composite material (EPOXY glass and ROHACELL). To keep the s mall amplification gap as uniform as possible, well-calibrated m icro-spacers (100 µm high and 200 µm in diameter) are deposited on the pads with a pitch of 2 mm in b oth directions. 2.Cathode : The cathode consists of a 9 µm gilded copper layer, glued on a 3 mm thick plate made of composite material and sandwiched betwe en two 300 µm thick 3GI180 boards. The top cathode plane is glued to a 6 mm thick Ple xiglas frame of 410×294 mm2. 3.Mesh : The original electro-formed micro-mesh1consists of a 3 µm thick grid of 22”×22” made of pure Ni. The 39 µm squared holes grid are outlined by a 11 µm thick border of Ni in steps of 50 µm, i.e. 500 LPI (“Lines Per Inch”). The optical transparency reaches 59%. The micro-mesh is stretched on th e Plexiglas frame which defines the 3 mm thick conversion gap between the micro-mesh a nd the cathode plane. 4. The micro-mesh and cathode assembly is placed on top of the micro-spacers of the anode plane. A 2 mm thick composite-material top-lid covers the whole system to ensure the gas tightness of the chamber. 5. The gas mixture flows through the detector at a pressure sli ghtly above atmospheric pressure. 6. The signals of the individual pads are collected, through the metallic hole, at the backplane of the anode plane by individual strips and transp orted to the front-end electronics located on the two opposite sides of the detecto r. 7. The total thickness of the detector throughout the active detection area, is 13 mm corresponding to 1.76% of X0. III. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP FOR THE BEAM TESTS Our prototype of the PPSD detector was tested in the T10 hall a t CERN (Fig. 4) The choice of the gas mixture during the experiment was Ar + 10% iC4H10(isobutane). The voltage of the drift zone was fixed to HVdrift= -1000 V. The basic elements of this test experiment were: 1.Beam. The PS accelerator at CERN delivered a secondary beam of 2 GeV /c momen- tum. This beam consisted of hadrons ( ∼60%, mainly charged pions) and leptons ( ∼ 40%, mainly electrons). The size of the beam ”spot” was about 10 cm in diameter and the spill duration was 1 s with an inter-spill time of 9 s. The b eam intensity stayed in the range of 103to 105particles per spill. 2.Beam identification. Two Cherenkov detectors C 1and C 2were placed upstream of the detector to identify the impinging particles. However, only C 2(filled with CO 2at atmospheric pressure) allowed a discrimination between ha drons and leptons. 3.Trigger. Two plastic scintillators (Pl 1and Pl 2) with a square shape of 10 ×10 cm2 were inserted along the beam line (Fig. 4) to define the main tr igger of the acquisi- tion. Coincidences between Pl 1and Pl 2defined a wide beam trigger . A small plastic scintillator Pl 3(1×1 cm2) was also included in the trigger electronics during some ru ns 1BMC Industries, 278 East 7th Street, St. Paul, MN 55101, USA. 4to define a narrow beam trigger . It was used to measure the MICROMEGAS detector efficiency and the background induced by the passive converte r. 4.MICROMEGAS detectors. Two MICROMEGAS detector prototypes were placed upstream and downstream with respect to the passive convert er. Amplification of the pad signal was performed by GASSIPLEX based electronics [20 ]. The elemental elec- tronics card consisted of 3 GASSIPLEX chips serving 16 chann els each. These cards (6 cards per detector) were directly attached to the detecto r board. The GASSIPLEX sequential signal was digitized by the CAEN V550 VME ADC (up t o 1024 channels). Operations on the GASSIPLEX and the V550 module were synchro nized via a CAEN V551A VME sequencer. 5.Passive Converter. During a few runs, a passive lead converter, 6 mm thick, cover ing an area of 10 ×10 cm2was placed in between the two MICROMEGAS chambers. 6.PHOS array. An array of 8 ×8 PHOS type crystals was also placed at the end of the beam line but not used in our investigation. It is mention ed here for the sake of completeness. IV. DETECTOR PERFORMANCES The charge distribution collected by a single pad (Fig. 5) of the MICROMEGAS chamber when considering the wide beam trigger , exhibits two components: •For low amplitudes (50 mV) the intrinsic electronic noise of the pad exhibits a peaked Gaussian distribution. This corresponds to events in which beam particles fire the wide beam trigger and hit one of the neighboring pads. The mea n of the Gaussian distribution, MG, results from the intrinsic noise or pedestal. The width exp ressed as the standard deviation of the distribution, σG, results from the pad intrinsic elec- tronic noise, which depends on the capacitance of the pad and on the electromagnetic environment. •At larger amplitudes, one observes the detector response to ionizing particles which exhibits the usual Landau distribution reflecting the fluctu ations in the number of primary electrons created in the thin drift region. For a 3 mm gap filled with Ar+10% isobutane at atmospheric pressure, on average, about 34 ele ctrons per MIP are cre- ated. The maximum of the Landau distribution, ML, reflects the gain achieved in the amplification zone and its width the average number of primar y electrons (a smaller average number of primary electrons leading to larger fluctu ations). The correlated noise, a noise level common to all pad signals , adds to the intrinsic noise of a pad. It can be removed on an event-by-event basis. We defined this noise as Cn=1 NpadNpad/summationdisplay |Si|<3σGiSi (1) 5where Npadis the number of pads with a collected charge lower than 3 time s the width of the noise. After removal of this correlated noise (Fig. 5b), the charge distribution exhibits a much narrower noise peak, offering an improved discriminati on of MIP particles from noise, and leading to an increase of the detector efficiency. A. Gain in the amplification gap We have studied the evolution of the Landau distribution as a function of the micro-mesh voltage and for a constant cathode voltage. We observe that t he position of the maximum increases with the micro-mesh voltage: an increase of 20 V ch anges the position of the Landau maximum by a factor 2. The total number of electrons co llected at the anode pad is calculated as: Npad e=fL×(ML−MG) fg×e(2) where MLandMGare the position of the maximum of the Landau and Gaussian dis tribu- tions respectively, fg= 10 mV/fC is the gain of the GASSIPLEX (pre-amplifier and shap er) electronics [20], fLis the factor to convert the average charge from the maximum v alue (GEANT simulations of the energy loss fluctuations give fL= 2.5) and eis the charge of the electron. The gain, G, is calculated as: G=Npad e Nprim e(3) where Nprim eis the number of primary electrons generated in the conversi on gap. The gain ranges from several hundreds to several thousands for a volt age variation between 380 and 450 V (Fig. 6). The maximum achieved gain in the amplification gap, while staying below the spark threshold, is of the order of 104. B. Detector efficiency The detector efficiency for MIPs was studied as a function of th e detector gain (Fig. 7 and Fig. 8). The efficiency, ǫ, has been therefore defined as the ratio between the integrat ed area of the Landau distribution, L(c) starting from nσG(where nσGcorresponds to ntimes the noise width), and of the total integrated Landau distrib ution: ǫ=/integraltext nσGL(c)dc /integraltext 0L(c)dc(4) where cis the induced charge in a pad. A direct measurement of the det ector efficiency deduced from the events registered with the small beam trigger is in good agreement with the value deduced using the above method. For micromesh volt ages larger than 420 V (i.e. G > 3.0·103), the measured detector efficiency is larger than 95%. The ste ep drop of the detector efficiency for voltages below 410 V results from the f act that the gain is too low to induce a signal larger than the nominal noise dispersion. Su btraction of the correlated noise considerably improves the efficiency, and a 95% efficiency is al ready reached for a gain of 2·103. 6C. Discharges in the amplification gap The fundamental limitation of micro-pattern gas detectors results from the discharges induced by high particle fluxes or highly ionizing particles . Several mechanisms have been put forward to explain this breakdown process [17]. In the pa rticular environment expected in ALICE (mainly dominated by a hadron background at low flux, below 1 Hz/mm2), the transition to a streamer regime followed by a electrical dis charge occurs when the avalanche starts to contain a critical quantity of a few 107−108electrons (Raether criterion) [18]. Highly ionizing particles like alpha particles loose aroun d 500 keV of their kinetic energy in the drift gap releasing about Nprim e= 3·104primary electrons, whereas MIPs loose only around 1 keV (generating around 30 primary electrons). Alph a particles will, therefore, induce a discharge in the MICROMEGAS for gains above several 103(leading to Npadlarger than 107). The same effect is observed when the MICROMEGAS detector is irradiated with hadron MIPs, like charged pions. In this case, nuclear inter actions with nuclei of the gas mixture in the drift gap could be at the origin of the induced d ischarges, since a strong dependence with the average atomic number of the gas mixture has been observed [16,19]. Although MICROMEGAS detectors are very resistant to sparks , a discharge will induce a non-negligible dead time over the whole detector active are a, leading to a reduction of the effective efficiency. We have measured (Fig. 9) the discharge probability per ioni zing particle as a function of the detector gain. We obtain discharge probabilities rou ghly between 10−6and 10−5for different prototypes. The discharge probability does not de pend on the beam intensity, as it could be expected. However, since the beam intensity was mea sured by Pl 1and Pl 2coinci- dences, impinging-particle trajectories outside of the pl astic active area and passing through the MICROMEGAS detector, were not counted. This induces an a symmetric systematic error which would tend to slightly decrease the measured dis charge probability. Central heavy ion collisions at LHC will induce a flow of charg ed particles of the order of 50 charged particles per m2in PHOS [5]. Taking a conservative value of 8000 central collisions per second, the charged particle rate will be of t he order of 50 KHz per chamber. If the detector operates at gains of 2000 (leading to efficienc ies larger than 95%), we expect a spark probability of 3 ·10−6(Fig. 9), i.e. a spark rate of 0.15 spark/chamber/second. Ta king into account the fact that the dead time induced by a spark is l ess than 10 ms [16,19], the dead-time induced by sparks will be as low as 0.15%. In this re spect, the particle induced discharges are not a handicap of the MICROMEGAS detectors, w hen the chambers operate at modest gains. In addition, recent measurements [16,19], exhibit a strong dependence of the spark prob- ability per ionizing particle on the average atomic number o f the gas mixture, following a Z−4dependence. Therefore, selecting a gas mixture with Ne gas s hould lead to an additional reduction of the spark probability by more than one order of m agnitude. D. Background induced by the passive converter The background induced by the lead passive converter in the M ICROMEGAS pad cham- bers has also been studied. Using the narrow beam trigger (see Fig. 10 where almost no 7noise peak is apparent) we have measured the charge distribu tion in the neighboring pads without and with the lead passive converter. We observe the f ollowing (Fig. 11): •without converter, 2% of MIPs induce a signal larger than the nominal noise in a neighboring pad; •with converter, only 6% of MIP particles induce a signal in a n eighboring pad. We conclude that the passive converter induced background i s relatively small, and the detector occupancy of the MICROMEGAS pad chambers is hardly increased. E. Pre-shower response function to electrons and hadrons In this last section, we present the response function of the pre-shower detector to hadrons and electrons of 2 GeV/c momentum. The discrimination betwe en the hadron and electron beam was done by means of the Cherenkov counter C 2(Fig. 4). Comparisons of the experimental response functions with the results of GEANT3 .21 simulations of the pre- shower detector were also performed [7]. •Hadron beam (Fig. 12): The PC detector exhibits almost the same Landau-l ike distribution with and without the converter. Fluctuations of the deposited energy in the thin conversion gas gap were calculated using the PAI m odel implemented in GEANT. This simulation reproduces relatively well the sh ape of the Landau-like distribution, although GEANT underestimates the tail of th e measured distribution. •Electron beam (Fig. 13): Without converter, the PC detector exhibits the s ame Landau-like distribution observed with the hadron beam. Ho wever, by including the converter (1.07 X 0) in the setup, a wider distribution is observed: on average 6 5% of the impinging electrons develop an electromagnetic show er inside the converter. The secondary particles produced in the shower will result, on average, in a higher energy deposit in the gas cell associated to the anode-pad le ading to a broader charge distribution. GEANT3.21 simulations of the deposited ener gy by 2 GeV/c electrons describe rather well the observed distribution. We conclude that the hadron response function is not signific antly modified by the passive converter. However, electrons exhibit a very different resp onse function in the presence of the passive converter, due to the initial development of electr omagnetic showers. The deposited energy distribution in PC detector is wider, and this observ ation could be exploited to improve the electron and positron identification power of th e PHOS detector. V. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES We have developed a large-area MICROMEGAS detector with ano de pads read-out. Pro- totypes have been irradiated with a 2 GeV/c momentum beam of e lectrons and hadrons. We have studied the pad response function, the gain in the ampli fication gap and the detector 8efficiency as a function of the electric field. The measured per formances are in good agree- ment with those obtained in other MICROMEGAS developments. We have investigated the discharge probability per incident MIP particle, concl uding that the induced discharges do not represent a real handicap to operate MICROMEGAS chamb ers in the environment expected in central heavy-ion collisions at LHC energies. A pre-shower detector design based on a sandwich of two MICROMEGAS chambers with a passive Pb con verter in between, has been proven to be a promising option for the improvement o f PHOS detection capabili- ties. The measured background induced by the converter in th e MICROMEGAS chambers is very small. The pre-shower response function of hadrons a nd electrons presents various facets worth exploiting further. We observe that the hadron beam induces, in both gas detectors, the typical Landau-like distribution of the col lected charge. The electron beam not only induces the typical Landau-like distribution in th e CPV detector of the pre-shower but also exhibits a much wider charge distribution in the PC d etector, signing the initial development of the electromagnetic shower. Following the results of the tests discussed in the present a rticle, an improved version of a PPSD has been designed. The new detector has a larger active area (380 ×380 mm2), a thicker conversion gap (6 mm) better suited for the use of a ga s mixture like Ne with 5-10% of CO 2and a 200 µm amplification gap [21]. These improvements (larger amplifi cation gap and lighter gas mixture), will lead to allow for a reducti on of the spark probability by a factor 20 to 50, and therefore lead to a spark rate of 10 sparks /chamber/hour for the ALICE hadronic environment. In addition, the size of the pad has be en reduced to 11 ×11 mm2in order to reach the spatial resolution needed to determine th e shower vertex. VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank M. Ippolitov and PHOS collaborators for their help d uring the beam test at PS (CERN). The technology for manufacturing the circuit board has been efficiently developed by A. Gandi and R. de Oliveira (CERN-EST-MT). We would like to acknowledge here the fruitful discussions with Y. Giomataris and Ph. Rebourgear d at DAPNIA (Saclay), and with P. Lautridou, L. Luquin and M. Labalme of Subatech (Nantes) d uring the development of the MICROMEGAS prototypes. This work was supported in part b y the “Conseil R´ egional de la R´ egion des Pays de la Loire”, France. 9REFERENCES [1] Cheuk-Yin Wong ”Introduction to High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions”, World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 1994. [2] R. Albrecht et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 76(1996) 3506. [3] Proceedings Quark Matter 99, May 10-15 (1999), Torino, I taly. Nucl. Phys. A661 (1999). [4] ALICE Technical Proposal CERN/LHCC-95-71 LHCC/P3 (199 5). [5] PHOS TDR CERN/LHCC 99-4, ALICE TDR 2 (1999). [6] M. M. Aggarwal et al., in preparation. [7] http://AliSoft.cern.ch/offline/ [8] A. Oed, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A263 (1988) 351. [9] F. Sauli, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A419 (1998) 189. [10] Y. Giomataris, Ph. Rebourgeard, J.P. Robert and G. Char pak, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A376 (1996) 29. [11] Y. Giomataris, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A419 (1998) 239. [12] G. Charpak, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A412 (1998) 47. [13] G. Barouch et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A423 (1999) 32. [14] J.P. Cussonneau et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A419 (1998) 452. [15] Proceedings 2nd MICROMEGAS Workshop, 24 Feb. - 5 Mars 19 99, Saclay, France. [16] Proceedings 3rd MICROMEGAS Workshop (http://www-iph e.unil.ch/micromegas), 8 - 9 March 2000, Lausanne, Suisse. [17] P. Fonte, V. Peskov and B. Ramsey, IEEE 46(1999) 321. [18] A. Bressan et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A424 (1999) 321. [19] Ph. Rebourgeard, Private communication. [20] J. C. Santiard et al., Report CERN-ECP/94-17, 1994. [21] G. Mart´ ınez et al., in preparation. 10FIGURESPPSD µ+,− π, K+,−, ... γn, n_ e+,−+,− ~25 mm ~180 mmEMCA 'sµΩ ConverterPbWO4 crystal FIG. 1. Schematic view of the Pre-shower detector (PPSD) in f ront of the PHOS electromag- netic calorimeter (EMCA). µΩ stands for MICROMEGAS gas counters, CPV for the charged particle veto chamber and PC for the photon conversion chamb er. 11FIG. 2. Principle design of our MICROMEGAS detector prototy pe: side view of an assembled detector. 12FIG. 3. Principle design of our MICROMEGAS detector prototy pe: enlarged view showing the various components. 13/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 PHOSCherenkov Plastic1Plastic3 Plastic2 Beam: 2 GeV/c p, e,πConvertor µ−megas2megas1µ− Salle T10 @ PS (CERN) August 1999 FIG. 4. Experimental set-up during the in-beam tests. 14-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400020406080100120140160180 HVmesh=420Va) Collected charge distribution in one pad -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400020406080100120140160180 b) Collected charge distribution after removal of correlated noiseCharge (mV) FIG. 5. a) Charge distribution collected on a single pad indu ced by particles (electrons and hadrons) of 2 GeV/c momentum impinging on a MICROMEGAS chamb er. The solid line is a fit of the signal to a Landau distribution. b) The same charge d istribution after removal of the correlated noise. 15HVmesh(V)340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520Gain 102103104 Gain=0.0027 x exp( 33 x HV[kV] )Gain of the amplification gap FIG. 6. Gain in the amplification gap as a function of the volta ge applied on the micro-mesh. The solid line is to guide the eyes. 16Gain0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000Efficiency 0.20.40.60.81 larger than σG larger than 2 σG larger than 4 σG FIG. 7. Detector efficiency for MIPs as a function of the amplifi cation gain for different values of the noise gaussian width σG. The lines drawn through the symbols are to guide the eyes. 17Gain0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000Efficiency 0.20.40.60.81 larger than σG larger than 2 σG larger than 4 σG FIG. 8. Detector efficiency for MIP as a function of the amplific ation gain, after removal of the correlated noise Cn. The lines drawn through the symbols are to guide the eyes. 18Gain0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000Spark probability per particle 10-910-810-710-610-510-410-3 FIG. 9. Probability of discharge per ionizing particle cros sing the detector as a function of the gain. The lines drawn through the symbols are to guide the eye s. 19Charge (mV)-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Counts 050100150200250300350400 FIG. 10. Pad response function for MIPs in the case of the narr ow beam trigger. 20Charge (mV)0 100 200 300 400 500Counts 110102103104105 with converter without converter FIG. 11. Induced background by the 1 X0Pb converter placed in front of the MICROMEGAS chamber. 21Hadron induced charge (mV)-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Counts 0100200300400500with converter without converter Geant Simulation (Aliroot framework)with converter without converter Geant Simulation (Aliroot framework) FIG. 12. Measured pad response function for hadrons with and without converter, and a GEANT simulation. 22Electron induced charge (mV)0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800Counts 10102with converter without converter Geant Simulation (Aliroot framework)with converter without converter Geant Simulation (Aliroot framework) FIG. 13. Measured pad response function for electrons with a nd without converter, and a GEANT simulation. 23

ACCELERATION FOR THE m-STORAGE RING n-SOURCE David Neuffer, FNAL, Batavia, IL 60510, USA Abstract In a µ-storage ring neutrino source, a high-intensity proton source produces pions from a target, and muons from pi-decay are collected and cooled, accelerated to 10- 50 GeV energies, and inserted into a storage ring, where mu-decay produces neutrino beams. The system must accept a large-emittance large-energy-spread beam. A low-frequency acceleration system is used to capture and phase rotate the µ's, and a ~200 MHz high-gradient system is used for cooling and initial acceleration. A super conducting rf (SRF) scenario using a 200MHz linac, and 200 to 400MHz recirculating linacs accelerates the beam to full energy. These systems, variations and alternatives, and R&D status and requirements are discussed. 1 INTRODUCTION In this paper we discuss the acceleration requirements of a µ-storage ring neutrino source, and describe the current accelerator research program. An overview of a µ-storage ring ν-source is shown in figure 1.[1] This example uses the parameters developed for the Fermilab feasibility study, which is a primary source for this report. The muon source is based on a high- intensity proton synchroton which gene rates short, high- intensity pulses of protons. These pulses are transported onto a high-intensity target, where they produce large numbers of pions. The pions are cap tured within a high- field solenoid, which is adiabatically matched to a low- field solenoid transport which also contains a low- frequency acceleration system. The pions decay to muons within the transport, while the acceler ation system rotates the beam in phase space, limiting the energy spread while lengthening the bunches. The µ bunches are cooled by ionization cooling. The cooled bunches are then acceler ated through a linac and a sequence of recirculating linacs to full energy, where they are inserted into a storage ring. µ-decay in the straight sections of the ring provide ν-beams, from ( µ → e +νe+ νµ), which are directed toward a detector placed at a distance optimal for ν-oscillations (3000 km away in ref. 1). The design is largely based on the collaboration µ+-µ− Collider studies [2, 3, 4] The ref. 1 design goal is a 50 GeV µ-storage ring, and uses a 1MW proton source (16 GeV, 15 Hz, 3 ×1013 p/pulse) to obtain ~3 ×1020 stored µ/year or ~1020 decays in a long-baseline straight section. In this note we will describe the acceleration systems used for µ capture, cooling, and acceleration, with an emphasis on those used for acceleration of the beam to full energy. These acceleration systems are the largest cost items in the system and have some novel properties. Fig. 1: Layout of a µ-storage ring ν-source. (from ref. 1). 2 ACCELERATION FOR m-CAPTURE In the ν-factory scenario, protons produce π’s in a target, and the resulting π-beam is captured in a solenoidal focusing system and continued through a transport where π’s decay into µ’s, following π → µ + νµ. The initial π’s, and the product µ’s, are produced with a very large energy spread. Due to this energy spread, the beam bunch length increases in the decay transport and a longitudinal position-energy ( φ-E) correlation develops with the lower energy beam trailing behind the higher energy muons. To reduce the energy spread, the beam passes through acceleration systems which decelerate the head of each bunch and acce lerate the tail, obtaining a long bunch with small energy spread. Two types of acceleration systems have been considered for this π→µ capture section: • a low frequency rf system based on the use of ~30 MHz rf (~5 MV/m), and • an induction linac system (~200 ns long pulses at ~1MV/m. In the µ+-µ- Collider scenarios of ref. [2,3] a low- frequency rf system is used, which requires a ~50m long ~30MHz rf system at ~5MV/m and obtains a ~10m long bunch with δErms ~ 40MeV, which requires energy cooling for complete beam capture.In the ν-source of ref. 1, a 50 m decay drift is followed by a 100m induction linac with ΔV = -0.5 to 1.5 MV/m is used, obtaining an ~60m long bunch with δErms ≅ 20 MeV, Ekinetic = 200MeV is obtained. This beam is transported through an absorber and a 200 MHz bunching system, which forms the ~10% energy spread bunch into a string of ~40 200 MHz bunchlets. In ref [5] an rf system is combined with an induction linac, to obtain energy spreads minimized to 10 MeV or less, and from there captured into a string of 175 MHz bunchlets for subsequent cooling. Both the low frequen- cy rf systems and the induction linac require significant extensions of present technology. Designs for the induction linac module have been developed by S. Yu and I. Terechkine et al., and these initial designs may be changed. In ref. [1] the 100m long induction linac is composed of 1m modules(see fig. 2), with 0.1m gaps between conducting tubes. Each module consists of a set of toroidal magnetic cores surrounding an induction gap between cylindrical conductors. A pulser sends high-current pulses to the module that change the core magnetic fields, and the changing magnetic field generates an accelerating voltage across the induction gap. The induction module includes a 3 T solenoidal field, obtained from superconducting coils inside central conductors, inside the induction cores. The modules have a 20 cm radius beam channel within the conductors, and a 20 cm annular gap between the cylinder and the cores, so that the magnetic cores have an inner radius of 45cm and an outer radius of ~80 cm. The magnetic material of the cores can be Finemet, Metglas, or (newer) nanocrystalline compounds. Each module contains 10 6cm thick cores, so the entire system requires ~600000kg of material. A significant problem is the development of a suitable power supply and pulser system for the induction linac. While single pulses are comparatively easy, Ref. 1 includes a design with 4 sequential pulses (~100 ns pulses spaced by 400 ns) at 15 Hz, corresponding to 4 initial proton bunches from a 15 Hz proton driver. For each gap, the inductor energy is supplied by a Thyristor swiched capacitor bank (72 µF, 4kV), which feeds energy into 4 magnetic compressor pulse charge modules, 4 pulse forming lines, and delay lines and cell cables leading into the induction modules. The total system requires 8 MW cw power and is quite large in overall size and scope. Variations on this design concept are also being studied. Further design, as well as prototype testing, will be needed to find an optimal and verified solution. Low-frequency rf is also possible and is more adapted to a multi-bunch scenario. However the cavities required are very large and the gradients needed are larger than previously obtained at these frequencies. Fig. 2. Overview of two induction linac modules, showing cutaway views of cylindrical conducting tubes separated by accelerating gaps surrounded by ferrite cores, with focusing fields from solenoid al coils within the tube walls. 3 ACCELERATION FOR m-COOLING Following the φ-E rotation the µ-beam is captured into a string of rf buckets. To improve acceptance through the following accelerator and storage beam, The µ-beam is cooled using ionization cooling. The baseline cooling requirement is a reduction of transverse emittances by a factor of ~10, to εt,N,rms ≅ 0.0015 m. The cooling system requires high gradient acceleration as well as strong focusing. In the development of the ν- source studies, a ~ 200 MHz frequency was chosen. The frequency is high enough that high power sources are practical, and the cavities are large enough to accommodate the large emittance beams. To confine the large emittance beams and to focus the beams into the absorbers, strong solenoidal magnetic fields with B ≅ 5T are needed, which include coils surrounding the cavities. Since superconducting rf (SRF) does not function in high magnetic fields, it is not used here. Since µ’s interact weakly with materials, it is possible to have cavities with material crossing the beam line. One cavity design under construction consists of cylindrical “pill-box” Cu cavities with Be foils covering the beam irises. In this configuration the maximum electric fields are at the acceleration gaps, which enables maximum acceleration gradients. An alternative confi-guration has a gridded iris. The cooling system requires acceleration gradients of ~15MV/m at 200 MHz. Figure 3 shows a cooling cell with 200 MHz gridded cavities, liquid hydrogen absorbers, and superconducting magnetic coils providing ~5T focusing fields. ~100m of such structures are required in a complete cooling system. RF power requirements are quite high for this normal- conducting, high-gradient, low-frequency structure. A multibeam 10 MW klystron [1] is required for every ~2m of cavity structure, or ~75 klystrons for a complete 150m long cooling channel. Initial designs are ~4m long multibeam klystrons, with ~2.4m long IGBT modulators; these coud be arranged transverse to the cavities. The overall power requirements are quite large: ~750MW peak power but “only” ~2MW average power. While various other possible cooling configurations are under consideration, the major variants are in the external focusing systems and in the absorber configurations. The rf requirements for the required cooling remain roughly the same: ~100m (or more) of ~15MV/m, ~200MHz rf acceleration structures. However, the total installed cooling rf could be reduced if a multiturn cooling system were developed. A “Ring Cooler” with up to 10 turns may be possible. Figure 3: A cell for µ-cooling, including gridded acceleration cavities, liquid hydrogen absorbers, and magnetic coils. 4 ACCELERATION SCEN ARIOS A baseline acceleration scenario was developed for ref. 1 by Neuffer,[6] and after some modification and development was included in that study. Parameters are displayed in Table 1. It consists of a 3 GeV Linac, which injects into a 4-turn RLA (using 200 MHz SRF) which would take the beam to 11GeV, followed by a 5-turn RLA to take the beam to 50 GeV (using 400 MHz SRF). The design concept has been explored in some detail by Lebedev, who has developed beam transport systems for the linac, and by J. Delayen and H. Padamsee, who explored acceleration requirements.[1] For final µ energies greater than ~10 GeV the acce- leration system dominates the cost of the ν-Factory, and the acceleration structures and power sources dominate that cost. Multiturn use of the acceleration structures (in an RLA) reduces the rf costs (balanced by an increase in beam transport costs). Also higher-fre quency SRFshould be much lower in cost (both in structure and power requirements), and this mandates an increase in frequency where the beam dynamics allows it. The critical requirement is that the acceleration must be fast enough to avoid µ-decay, which means real-estate acceleration gradients more than a few MeV/m; say eV′ > ~5MeV/m. This includes transport elements; the design goal is V ′ > 15 MV/m within the acce leration cavity and < 67% of the transport length devoted to non- cavities (i. e., focusing, return arcs, spreaders, cryo- module connections, etc.). 4.1 Linac Initial acceleration is obtained in a 200 MHz SRF linac. In the linac, the initial acceleration is off crest (by −77°)in order to capture the beam from cooling, which has an rms bunch length of ~15cm (5 σ full width = 0.75m or 180 °) and rms energy width of 20MeV (100MeV full width). As the bunch accelerates the beam adiabatically damps over the first ~1 GeV of acceleration to σz ≅ 4cm and δErms ≅ 80 MeV. The phase is moved to crest over the linac length (a linear ramp in phase with distance was used). In Ref. [1, 9] transverse focussing from injection to ~ 2 GeV is provided by solenoids, with central field increasing from ~1T to 5T over the linac. Initially the solenoids are spaced between two cavities (~6m apart), and this is increased to 4-cavity cells at 1 GeV (~12m cells) Throughout the linac the accelerating cells occupy ~50% of the actual linac length, so the effective accelerating gradient is ~7.5 MV/m. There may be diffi- culty in isolating the solenoidal fields from the superconducting cavities. Solenoid focusing is not essential in the linac. Popovic has developed a scenario relying on quadrupole FODO focusing, which could be continued into the RLA.[8] For the remainder of the linac, and for the following RLA linacs and arcs, a triplet focusing configuration is used (in ref. 1).[9] The advantages of a triplet is that the beam remains nearly round throughout the cavities (focused in both x and y), enabling long magnet-free sections for multi-cavity cryomodules (up to 10m long). Also only one dimension (i. e., x) has a large size in the triplet, and therefore large chromaticity; a 1-D chromatic correction may be adequate. Alternative “FODO” lattices for the arcs, which enable both x and y correction are also possible. 4.2 RLA design Linac acceleration is continued until the beam is fully relativistic and the longitudinal beam size ( δz-δE/E) is matched into a RLA acceptance. For ref. 1, 3 GeV was chosen for the transition energy into a first RLA. The principles of µ-RLA acceleration are described in ref. [7]. In an RLA the beam is injected into a linac, accelerated, and returned by arc transports for multiplepasses of acceleration through the same linac(s). At the end of each linac, beam transport (through dipoles) sorts the beam by energy directing each pass beam through a separate return arc transport. At the end of the arc the separate transports are recombined for acceleration in the following linac. To cleanly separate the various passes, the beam energy width must be less than the energy difference. The energy widths and the costs of separate transports limit the number of recirculation turns. Because µ-bunches have a large longitudinal phase space, it is desirable to accelerate off-crest and use non- isochronous return arcs to obtain stable longitudinal motion (controlling energy spread δE) through each pass as well as to match the σz-δE bunch sizes into the following accelerators. Since each return transport is separate the central phase φs and chronicity M 56 = d(δz)/d(δp/p) can be tuned in each turn. The first RLA (200 MHz) takes the beam from the linac to a suitable energy for injection into RLA2 (400MHz). The longitudinal motion must confine the beam and match the beam into RLA2, which means reducing the bunch length by a factor of ~2. The beam transport must accept the full energy spread, which changes from δE/E = ±2.5σ = ±8% to ±4% at extraction into RLA2, with the rms bunch length changing from 4.2 to 2.2cm, as the beam is accelerated from 3 to 11 GeV. Lattices with the desired optics have been developed by Lebedev and Bogascz.[9] In RLA2 the beam is accelerated within a stable rf bucket and then injected into the storage ring, where the design constraint is to obtain a minimal energy spread for easier acceptance in the storage ring. At the parameters of table 1, the energy spread reduces from ±4% to ±1% (with a maximum of ±6% at E = 20GeV) in RLA2 with a maximum of as the beam accelerates to 50 GeV. A similar scenario of Lebedev[9] uses M 56 = 2 m and keeps the beam energy small throughout RLA2, at the cost of a smaller acceleration bucket. Transverse motion is not yet detailed for RLA2. Results of simu- lations of the longitudinal motion through the acceleration sequence are displayed in fig. [5]. 4.3 SRF and power considerations. The 200 MHz cavities are 1.5m long two-cell cavities. Scaling from TESLA/LEP II, the cells are 75cm long, and have an outer radius of 65 cm with beam apertures of ~20cm. The 400 MHz cavities are half the transverse size of these, and would come in 4-cell 1.5m cavities (similar to LEP II). These would be grouped into cryo- modules consistent with the focusing; 10m (4-cavity) cryomodules are in the present design. RF power design is also discussed in ref. [1]. The 200 MHz cavities in the linac and RLA1 require 820 kW/cell with a fill time of 2ms. The 400 MHz cavities of RLA2 require only 200 kW/cell. With klystrons of peak power of 8—9MW (240—270kW ave. power), the linacrequires 32 klystrons (10 cells/ klystron, 3.6GV total voltage), RLA 1 requires 23 klystrons (2.6 GV total voltage), and RLA2 requires 25 klystrons (60 cells/ klystron, 8.5 GV total) The total average power is 20.4 MW (7.9, 5.7, 6.8 MW for Linac, RLA1, RLA2). Note that a 400 MHz RLA2 would require 4 × more power. The total number of klystrons in the SRF accelerator is approximately the same as that of the normal conducting cooling section, which has less than 2GV of total voltage. 4.4 Acceleration variations Since the accelerator is the largest cost item, it can be possible to greatly decrease the cost by changes in that system. It would be desirable to use higher-frequency rf systems, and a scenario which moved the acceleration from 200 to 400 MHz earlier (and possibly on to 800 …) could be much more affordable. More cooling in the scenario (including energy cooling) may enable this. Overall costs could also be reduced by adding more passes in each RLA, reducing rf requirements at the cost of additional transport. Significant changes are also required if a different final energy is chosen. For a 20 GeV scenario, a 2 GeV linac with a single 6-pass RLA is being considered. A 400 MHz rf system could be used for the RLA, if beam size and energy spread are controlled. Costs could also be reduced if an “FFAG-like” configuration could be developed. This would be similar to an RLA with acceleration modules and return arc transport. The difference is that the beam transport is designed with a broad enough energy spread acceptance that all of the energy turns return within the same arc. Thus the number of turns of acceleration could be increased from 4—5 to ~10—20, reducing the rf structure requirements. The transport costs may be sig- nificantly less (since the number of return arcs is re- duced, but at the cost of higher δE-acceptance tran- sports). 5 RF R&D PROGRAM The µ-storage ring ν-source requires new rf systems and R&D programs have been initiated to develop these systems. The minimum rf system requirements are an induction linac (or low-frequency rf) for initial capture, a ~200 MHz normal-conducting rf system for cooling, and an efficient 200 MHz SRF acceleration rf. R&D on development of induction linac systems has been initiated by S. Lee at LBL. 200 MHz rf studies are based at LBL and at Fermilab. Initial designs of rf cavities have been developed, both with Be windows and with gridded irises. These studies will build on the 805 MHz R&D program, which has built Be window cavities (and open cell cavities), and will provide high-gradient tests of these structures. A test setup for 200 MHz rf will be added to the Fermilab 805 MHz test lab. Also Super-conducting rf programs designing and building prototype accelerating cavities have been initiated by Padamsee et al. at Cornell and by Delahaye et al. at TJNAF. 6 CURRENT STATUS AND PLANS A 6-months study on the physics potential[10] for a µ- storage ring ν-source and a feasibility study on the beam facilities[1] have just been completed at Fermilab. These studies conclude that the physics potential of that source is interesting and important, and that the general concept is technically feasible. The feasibility study identified key “cost drivers” (expensive components and features) and performance limitations; the critical cost drivers are the acceleration and beam cooling systems. In the next year, a design study based at BNL will be developed with somewhat different scope, and facility requirements, and some site-dependent con straints. In this study the collection and cooling channel will be reoptimized for performance and affordability, and the acceleration will also be reoptimized. REFERENCES [1] N. Holtkamp and D. Finley, ed. “A Feasibility Study of a Neutrino Source Based on a Muon Storage Ring”, Fermilab, April 15th, 2000. [2] µ+µ- Collider - A Feasibility Study, BNL-52503, Fermi-Lab-Conf.-96-092, LBNL-38946 (1996), presented at the Snowmass 96 workshop (1997). [3] C. M. Ankenbrandt et al., Phys. Rev. Special Topics Accel. Beams 2, 081001 (1999). [4] Muon Collider and Neutrino Factory notes, see http://www-mucool.fnal.gov/notes/notes.html. [5] R. Palmer, C .Johnson, E. Keil, CERN-SL-99-070- AP, Nov 1999. MUCOOL note Nr. 67. [6] D. Neuffer, MuCOOL-note 75, January 2000. [7] D. Neuffer, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A 384, p. 263 (1997). [8] M. Popovic, these Linac 2000 proceedings (2000). [9] V. Lebedev and A. Bogacz, unpublished (2000). [10] C. Albright et al., “Physics at a Neutrino Factory”, Fermilab study FERMILAB-FN-692, May 10, 2000. 50 GeV m-Accelerator Parameters Parameter Linac RLA1 RLA2 Initial Kinetic Energy 0.12 3 11 GeV Final Kinetic Energy 3.0 11 50 GeV Number of turns 1 4 5 Rf Voltage/linac 3.6 1.15 4.3 GV Acceleration phase 77→-6° 30°25→0° M56 per arc --- 0.5 →1.4 0.3→0 m Rf frequency 200 200 400 MHz Rms bunch length 15 → 4 → 2 → 1.5 cm Rms energy spread 20 → 80 → 160 → 220 MeV Linac length (2 per RLA) 500 200 800 m Arc length --- 220 700 mFig. 4. Overview of accelerator for the µ-storage ring ν-source. Fig. 5 Simulation of longitudinal motion in acceleration; φ-δE plots of beam at linac injection (0.12 GeV kinetic energy), beginning of RLA1 (2.97GeV), beginning of RLA2 (10.9 GeV, 400 MHz), and end of RLA2(50.7 GeV).Accelerator for m-storage ring to m-storage ring Return arcs Linac Linac Injection Linac RLA2 RLA1

arXiv:physics/0008005v1 [physics.acc-ph] 3 Aug 2000A FAST SWITCHYARD FORTHETESLAFEL-BEAM USING ASUPERCONDUCTING TRANSVERSE MODE CAVITY RainerWanzenberg, DESY, Notkestr. 85,22603Hamburg,Germany Abstract InthepresentdesignoftheTESLALinearColliderwithin- tegratedX-ray Laser Facility it is necessarythat 1 ms long bunch trains with about 10000 bunches are generated and distributed to several free electron laser (FEL) beam lines . ThedifferentscientificapplicationsoftheX-rayFELsneed specificfillingpatternsofthebunchesinthebunchtrain. It isshownthatafastswitch-yardbasedonasuperconducting transversemodecavitycanbeusedtogeneratetherequired bunch pattern in a flexible way while keeping the beam loading in the main linear accelerator constant. The con- ceptual design of the beam optics and the transverse mode cavityare presented. 1 INTRODUCTION The conceptual design of the TESLA linear collider with integrated x-ray laser facility [1] requires that 1 ms long bunch trains with 11315 bunches are generated and dis- tributed to several free electron laser (FEL) beam lines, while bunch trains with 2882 bunches are accelerated to 250 GeV for highenergyphysics(HEP) experiments. The e−linear accelerator,the two extractionpoints(at 25 GeV and50GeV)fortheFEL-beamandthebeamtransferlines are shown schematically in Fig. 1. The first part of the e− linear accelerator is operatedat a duty cycle of 10 Hz pro- viding alternately HEP and FEL pulses. The pulse struc- /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 e-e- e+e-Damping Ring (HEP - Beam)FEL - Beam Injector (FEL - Beam) Linear Accelerator 25 GeV 50 GeV FEL-Beam Transfer Line High Energy Physics Exp.X-Ray LaserFEL-Beam Switchyard Figure 1: The e−linear accelerator of the TESLA linear colliderwithintegratedx-raylaserfacility.tureisillustratedinFig.2. Themeanpulsecurrentisabout 10 mA for the HEP and FEL pulses, which guaranteesthe same beam loading in the cavities for both pulse-types. Different scientific applications of the X-ray FELs need 100 ms 100 ms1 nC3 nCbunch charge HEP bunch train 2882 x 337 ns x 3.2 nCFEL bunch train 11315 x 93 ns x 1 nC t Figure2: HEPandFELbeampulsestructure specific filling patterns of the bunches in the FEL bunch trains [2]. Four examples of filling patterns are shown in Fig. 3(a,b,c,d). Case a is the (standard) 93 ns constant- spacing pattern, while b and c are two examples how the number of bunches and the bunch distance may be varied. Casedisaspecialcasewithamuchshorterbunchtobunch distance of 769 fs or one 1.3GHz rf-bucket. In the follow- t93 nsbunch charge a b dct1 nCt1 nC 1 nC t1 nCs s s s1 m1 m1 m1 m pump and probevar. bunch distance11315 x 93 ns x 1 nC 100 bunches in 80 nsconstant spacing (93 ns) s1 µ Figure 3: Different bunch filling patterns of a FEL beam pulse. ingsectionsit isshownhowfillingpatternslikeFig.3(b,c) can be generated from a standard constant-spacing pattern using a fast switchyard based on a transversemode cavity. AmuchshorterbunchspacingasinFig.3(d)ofcoursere- quiresa special bunchgenerationalreadyat the FEL beam injector. Whethersuchabunchtraincanbeacceleratedup- to 50 GeV without severe cumulative multi-bunch beam break-upisbeyondthescopeofthispaper.2 BASIC DESIGN OFA FAST SWITCHYARD Thegoalofafastswitchyardistodistributesinglebunches or sub-trains of bunches within one 1 ms long bunch train to different beam lines. The typical bunch distance is 120 rf-buckets of the 1.3GHz main linac rf-system or 120×0.769 ns = 92 .28 ns. But some scientific applica- tion of the FEL require special filling patterns with even shorter and varying bunch distances (see Fig. 3). This requirement can be accomplished by a pulsed supercon- ducting transverse mode cavity operated at a frequency of 1.5×1.3 GHz = 1 .95 GHzwith a 1 ms rf-pulse duration andadelaylineforthelasersystemoftherf-gun. The 1.95 GHz deflectingcavityisoperatedin apulsedmodesimilar to the 1.3GHz accelerating cavity of the main linac. This avoidsrisetimeorstabilityproblemsofthekickappliedto individualbunches. Thechoice of the frequencylabels the 1.3GHzbucketsasevenandoddbuckets. Bunchesineven bucketsarekickedintotheoppositedirectionthanthosein odd buckets, which enables the splitting of one 1 ms long pulse into several sub-bunch trains. The principle is illus - trated in Fig. 4: A bunch train is generated with a bunch- to-bunch distance of 92.28ns or 120 free 1.3GHz buck- ets witha few exceptionswherethedistance is 93.05nsor 121buckets. Anevennumberofbucketsbetweenbunches 1.95 GHzbunch charge transverse mode cavity1 nC t92.28 ns 92.28 ns 92.28 ns 93.05 ns 93.05 ns Figure4: Principleofafast FEL-Beamswitchyard guaranteesthat all bunchesare kicked into the same direc- tion by thetransversemodecavity. An oddnumberoffree bucketsbetweensub-bunchtrainsresultsin aswitch ofthe directionofthekickasshowinFig.4. Theadditionaldelay of one rf-bucket (or any odd number of rf-buckets) can be achievedbyanopticaldelaylineofthelaserbeampulseat the rf-gun. The beam optics of the switchyard is based on a FODO cell which is shown in Fig. 5. The kick due to the trans- versemodecavityisenhancedbyadefocusingquadrupole [3]. Abunchoffset d0of5 mmattheendofthecavitysec- tion,d1= 15 mm within the quadrupoleand d2= 40 mm at the septum can be achieved with the design parameters summarizedintable1fortwobeamenergies. Inbothcases a transverse gradient of 5 MV/m is necessary to provide a kick of 1.5(1.0)mrad. Thedetails ofthe cavity designare discussedin thenextsection.Acascadedswitchyardschemewitha 1.5×1.3GHzand additional 1.75×1.3GHz transversemodecavitieswould allow the distribution of the bunches of a 1 ms long pulse to four FEL beam lines. The details are not discussed in thispaper. SeptumQuad Deflecting Cavity L Lcavd dd01 2 Figure 5: Fast FEL-Beam Splitter. The kick due to the defecting mode is enhanced by a defocusing quadrupole magnet. beamenergy 25GeV 50GeV total kick 1.5mrad 1.0mrad activecavitylength Lcav 7.5m 10m transversegradient GT 5MV/m 5MV/m total length(see Fig.5) L 17m 25m quadrupolestrength kquad 0.2 m−20.13 m−2 min. betafunction ˇβ 20m 28m max. betafunction ˆβ 61m 86m Table1: Designparametersofthebeamopticsforthefast switchyard. 3 DESIGN OFTHETRANSVERSE MODECAVITY The basic design parameters of a transverse mode cavity are the transverse gradient GT, the peak magnetic field on the surface Bpeak,(R/Q)′and G1. The gradient GTis simply the average of the transverse component of the Lorentz force GT= 1/Lcav/integraltext dz/bracketleftBig /vectorE⊥(z, t=z/c) +c /vector ez×/vectorB(z, t=z/c)/bracketrightBig acting on the beam; for a dipole mode GTdoes not depend on the radial position of the beam in the cavity. Superconductivitybreaksdownwhen the rf magnetic field exceeds the critical field of 0.2. . .0.24T for Niobium. Therefore the transverse gradient GTis limited by the peak magneticsurfacefield. A superconductingtransverse mode S-band cavity has been operated for an RF particle separator with a transverse gradient of 1.2to1.4MV/m [4]. Present design studies of transverse mode cavities at Fermilab [5] are aiming at gradients of 5.0MV/m. An accelerating gradient of 25 MV/m in the 1.3 GHz TESLA cavities corresponds to a peak magnetic surface field of 0.105T. A similar peak magnetic field of about 0.11T corresponds to a transverse gradient of 5 MV/m for the π-dipole-mode cavity shown in Fig. 6, which represents one possible shape of a transverse mode cavity with a relatively large iris diameter of 76 mm. The results are0. 0.768 0.3840.9.236E-02 4.618E-02 Figure 6: Right half of the transverse mode cavity. The elect ric field of the 1.95GHzπ-dipole-modeis shown (MAFIA calculation[6]). 15cellscontributetothedeflection,whi le theend-cellsmatchthefield tothatinthe beampipe. obtainedwiththeMAFIA[6]code. Alargeirisdiameteris advantageouswithrespecttowakefieldeffectsbutrequires a special matching cell at the end of the cavity to achieve goodfield flatnessofthe dipolemode. Frequency f 1.95GHz (R/Q)′274 Ohm G1 224 Ohm Numberofactivecells 15 Activelength Lcav 1.15 m Transversegradient GT 5MV/m Peakmagneticfield Bp 0.11 T Q-value Q0 3.8·109 RF heatload(5Hz,2K) 0.12 W ExternalQ-value Qext 3·106 Fillingtime TF 490 µs RF-peak-power Prf 20 kW Table 2: Basic design parameters of the transverse mode cavity. Furtherimportantparametersare (R/Q)′andG1,which are definedaccordingtotheequations: (R/Q)′=1 4πf|GTLcav|2 U, Q 0=G1 RBCS(f, T),(1) where Uis the stored energy of the cavity mode and RBCS(f, T)theBCS-resistivity ofNiobium. Theparame- ter(R/Q)′isessentiallytheratioofthesquareofthetrans- verse gradient to the energy which is stored in the cavity mode. G1is a purely geometrical parameter which relates thesurfaceresistivitytotheQ-valueofthecavity. TheBCS resistivity for the 1.95GHz cavity at 2 K has been scaled fromthe 1.3GHzTESLAacceleratingcavityaccordingto RBCS(f, T)∼(f2/T) exp( −1.76Tc/T),(2) and usinga Q-valueof 1·1010for theTESLA cavity. The dissipatedpowerat2Kduringonepulseforonetransverse mode cavity with an active length of 1.15m is 16 W ac- cordingto P=/parenleftbigg 5MV m/parenrightbigg21 2 (R/Q)′Q, (3) withQ0= 3.8·109, resulting in a average rf heat load of0.12W for a 5 Hz operation. The same formula can be used to calculate the required rf-peak-power by using the external Q,Qext,whichisdeterminedbythecoupling. An external Qof3·106hasbeenchosen,forwhichoneobtainsa filling time of 490µs(TF=Qext/(π f)) which is sim- ilar to the filling time of the 1.3GHz TESLA accelerating cavity. The switchyardfor a 25 GeV (50 GeV) beam would re- quire seven (ten) transverse mode cavities with the param- eters consideredin table 2. The total rf-peak-powerfor 17 cavities is 340kW and the total rf heat load is 2 W at 2 K fora 5Hzoperation. 4 CONCLUSION It is feasible to distribute single bunches or sub-bunch trainsoutofa1mslongbunchtraintotwobeamlinesusing a fast switchyard based on a transverse mode cavity oper- atedat 1.95GHz. Theconceptualdesignofthebeamoptics and the dipole mode cavity have been presented. An engi- neering design of the system would require further studies for the following subsystems: delay line of the laser pulse at the rf-gun, integration of a dispersion suppression and a collimation section into the beam optics, and design of fundamental mode dampers at the transverse mode cavity. Depending on the required bunch pattern it is possible to doublethebeamtimeforscientificapplications(e.g. pump andprobeexperiments)witha fast switchyard. Acknowledgments IwouldliketothankJ.Rossbachfordiscussions andcontrib uting ideas for the basic design of a fast switchyard. Thanks go als o to H. Edwards and M. McAshan for their kind hospitality dur- ing my visit at Fermilab in 1999 where I became involved in the design of transverse mode cavities. Furthermore I would lik e to thank M. Lomperski for carefully reading the manuscript dur ing breakfast. 5 REFERENCES [1] R. Brinkmann, G. Materlik, J. Rossbach, A. Wagner eds. Conceptual Design of a 500 GeV e+e−Linear Collider with Integrated X-ray Laser Facility , DESY 1997-048, ECFA1997-182 [2] G.Materlik, FELUser Requirements ,TESLATDRMeet- ing, Zeuthen, Feb. 3-9, 2000 [3] J.Rossbach, private communications, DESY [4] A. Citron, et al. First Operation of a Superconducting RF- ParticleSeparator NIM155, 1978, p93-96 [5] J. D. Fuerst et al., An RF Separated Kaon Beam from the Main Injector: Superconducting Aspects , FERMILAB- TM-2060 [6] T. Weiland, On the numerical solution of Maxwell's Equa- tions and Applications in the Field of Accelerator Physics , Part.Acc.15 (1984), 245-292

arXiv:physics/0008006v1 [physics.class-ph] 3 Aug 2000On electromagnetic induction Giuseppe Giuliani Dipartimento di Fisica ‘Volta’, Via Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, It aly Email: giuliani@fisav.unipv.it Web site - http://matsci.unipv.it/percorsi/ Abstract . A general law for electromagnetic induction phenomena is d erived from Lorentz force and Maxwell equation connecting electric fiel d and time variation of magnetic field. The derivation provides with a unified math ematical treatment the statement according to which electromagnetic inductio n is the product of two independent phenomena: time variation of magnetic field and effects of magnetic field on moving charges. The general law deals easily - withou tad hoc assumptions - with typical cases usually considered as exceptions to the fl ux rule and contains the flux rule as a particular case. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 A general law for electromagnetic induction 2 2.1 A definition of emf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2/vectorAversus /vectorB. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 How the law works 5 3.1 General features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2 How it works in specific cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.1 When a bar is moving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.2 The Faraday disc: 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.3 The unipolar induction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2.4 The flux varies, but... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2.5 The ‘rocking plates’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2.6 The Corbino disc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.2.7 The Faraday disc: 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4 General law and flux rule 15 5 Conclusions 161 Introduction It is, in general, acknowledged that the theoretical treatm ent of electromagnetic induction phenomena presents some problems when part of the electrical circuit is moving. Some authors speak of exceptions to the flux rule;1others save the flux rule byad hoc choices of the integration line over which the induced emfis calculated. Several attempts to overcome these difficulties have been mad e; a comprehensive one has been performed by Scanlon, Henriksen and Allen.2However, their treatment - as others - fails to recognize that one must distinguish betw een the velocity of the circuit elements and the velocity of the electrical charges (see section 2 below). Therefore, these authors reestablish the flux rule and, cons equently, do not solve the problems posed by its application. Since 1992, I have been teaching electromagnetism in a cours e for Mathematics students and I had to deal with the problems outlined above. I have found that it is possible to get a general law for electromagnetic induc tion that contains the standard flux rule as a particular case. The matter has conceptual relevance; it has also historical and epistemological aspects that deserve to be investigated. Therefore, it is, p erhaps, worthwhile to submit the following considerations to the attention of a pu blic wider than that of my students. 2 A general law for electromagnetic induction Textbooks show a great variety of positions about how the flux rule can be applied to the known experimental phenomena of electromagnetic ind uction. Among the more lucid approaches, let us refer to the treatment given by Feynman, Leighton and Sands in the Feynman Lectures on Physics . They write: In general, the force per unit charge is /vectorF/q=/vectorE+/vector v×/vectorB. In moving wires there is the force from the second term. Also, there is a n/vectorEfield if there is somewhere a changing magnetic field. They are two ind ependent effects, but the emf around the loop of wire is always equal to t he rate of change of magnetic flux through it.3 This sentence is followed by a paragraph entitled Exceptions to the “flux rule” , where the authors treat two cases - the Faraday disc and the ‘r ocking plates’ - both 1R. Feynman, R. Leighton and M. Sands The Feynman Lectures on Physics , vol. II, (Addison Wesley, Reading, Ma., 1964 ), pp. 17 - 2,3. 2P.J. Scanlon, R.N. Henriksen and J.R. Allen, “Approaches to electromagnetic induction”, Am. J. Phys., 37, (1969), 698 - 708. 3R. Feynman, R. Leighton and M. Sands The Feynman Lectures on Physics , vol. II, (Addison Wesley, Reading, Ma., 1964), p. 17 - 2. 2characterized by the fact that there is a part of the circuit i n which the material of the circuit is changing. As the authors put it, at the end of the discussio n:4 The ‘flux rule does not work in this case. It must be applied to c ircuits in which the material of the circuit remain the same. When the material of the circuit is changing, we must return to the basic laws. T hecorrect physics is always given by the two basic laws /vectorF=e(/vectorE+/vector v×/vectorB) (1) ∇ ×/vectorE=−∂/vectorB ∂t(2) 2.1 A definition of emf In order to try shedding some more light on the subject, let us begin with the acknowledgement that the expression of Lorentz force /vectorF=q(/vectorE+/vector v×/vectorB) (3) not only gives meaning to the fields solutions of Maxwell equa tions when applied to point charges, but yields new predictions.5 The velocity appearing in the expression of Lorentz force is the velocity of the charge: from now on, we shall use the symbol /vector vcharge for distinguishing the charge velocity from the velocity /vector vlineof the circuit element that contains the charge. This is a basic point of the present treatment . Let us consider the integral of ( /vectorE+/vector vcharge ×/vectorB) over a closed loop: E=/contintegraldisplay l(/vectorE+/vector vcharge ×/vectorB)·/vectordl=/contintegraldisplay l/vectorE·/vectordl+/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vcharge ×/vectorB)·/vectordl (4) This integral yields the work done by the electromagnetic fie ld on a unit positive point charge along the closed path considered. It presents i tself as the natural definition of the electromotive force, within the Maxwell - L orentz theory: emf=E. Let us now calculate the value of Egiven by equation (4). The calculation of the first integral appearing in the third member of equation (4) y ields: /contintegraldisplay l/vectorE·/vectordl=/integraldisplay Srot/vectorE·ˆn dS=−/integraldisplay S∂/vectorB ∂t·ˆn dS (5) 4Ibidem, p. 17 - 3. 5The fact that the expression of Lorentz force can be derived b y considering an inertial frame in which the charge is at rest and by assuming that the force acting on it is simply given by /vectorF′=q/vectorE′, does not change the matter. 3where Sis any surface having the line las contour and where we have made use of Maxwell equation (2). The calculation of the last integral o f equation (5) yields: /contintegraldisplay l/vectorE·/vectordl=−d dt/integraldisplay S/vectorB·ˆndS−/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl (6) where /vector vlineis the velocity of the circuit element /vectordl.6Notice that equation (6) is the result of a theorem of vectorial calculus that is valid for an y vector field /vectorG, like the magnetic field, for which div/vectorG= 0. Therefore, we get: E=/bracketleftBigg −d dt/integraldisplay S/vectorB·ˆn dS−/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl/bracketrightBigg +/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vcharge ×/vectorB)·/vectordl (7) This equation says that: 1. The induced emfis, in general, given by three terms. 2. The first two - grouped under square brackets for underlini ng their common mathematical and physical origin - come from the line integr al/contintegraltext l/vectorE·/vectordl, whose value is controlled by Maxwell equation (2) through equatio n (5). Accordingly, their sum must be zero when the magnetic field does not depend o n time . In this case, the law assumes the simple form: E=/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vcharge ×/vectorB)·/vectordl (8) 3. The third term comes from the magnetic component of Lorent z force; we shall see later how this term may be different from zero. 4. The flux rule is contained in the general law as a particular case. The general law (7) can be written also in terms of the vector p otential /vectorA. If we put /vectorE=−grad ϕ −∂/vectorA ∂t(9) in the first integral of the third member of equation (4), we ge t at once E=−/contintegraldisplay l∂/vectorA ∂t·/vectordl+/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vcharge ×/vectorB)·/vectordl (10) since/contintegraltext lgrad ϕ ·/vectordl= 0. When the magnetic field does not depend on time ( ∂/vectorB/∂t = 0), we have: /contintegraldisplay l/vectorE·/vectordl=−/contintegraldisplay l∂/vectorA ∂t·/vectordl=−/integraldisplay Srot∂/vectorA ∂t·ˆn dS= 0 (11) 6A. Sommerfeld, Lectures in Theoretical Physics , vol. II, (Academic Press, New York) 1950, pp. 130 - 132; ibidem, vol. III, p. 286. 4sincerot(∂/vectorA/∂t) = 0, because ∂/vectorB/∂t = 0. Therefore, the only surviving term in the expression of the induced emfis coming from the magnetic component of Lorentz force and the law assumes the form given by equation (8). 2.2 /vectorAversus /vectorB Traditionally, textbooks use equations containing the mag netic field in dealing with induction phenomena: the emfin a loop is partially (general law) or totally (flux rule) dependent on a surface integral of /vectorB. The laws are predictive, but they are not causal laws. The values of /vectorBover the surface of integration cannot be causally related to the value of the emfaround the circuit because /vectorBacts at a distance (with an infinite propagation velocity): in this case ,/vectorBis not a goodfield, since a goodfield, in Feynman’s words, can be defined as ...a set of numbers we specify in such a way that what happens at a point depends only on the numbers at that point . We do not need to know any more about what’s going on at other places.7 On the contrary, the same equations written in terms of the ve ctor potential, are causal laws since they relate the value of the emfaround the circuit to the values of −∂/vectorA/∂t at the points of the loop: the vector potential is, in this cas e, agoodfield. 3 How the law works 3.1 General features Let us come back to the general law (7 or 10). The charge veloci ty appearing in these equations contributes to build up, through the factor /vector vcharge ×/vectorBthe induced electromotive field. The charge velocity is given by: /vector vcharge =/vector vline+/vector vdrift (12) where /vector vdriftis the drift velocity. Therefore, the general equation for electromagnetic induc tion assumes the form: E=/bracketleftBigg −d dt/integraldisplay S/vectorB·ˆn dS−/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl/bracketrightBigg + +/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl+/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vdrift×/vectorB)·/vectordl (13) 7R. Feynman, R. Leighton and M. Sands The Feynman Lectures on Physics , vol. II, (Addison Wesley, Reading, Ma., 1964), p. 15 - 7. Feynman, uses the term ‘real field’ instead of ‘good field’. Feynman deals with this problem in discussing the Bohm - Ahar anov effect. It is interesting to see that an identical situation arises in classical electromag netism. 5or, in terms of the vector potential: E=−/contintegraldisplay l∂/vectorA ∂t·/vectordl+/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl+/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vdrift×/vectorB)·/vectordl (14) When the circuit is made by a loop of wire, equation (13) reduc es to equation E=/bracketleftBigg −d dt/integraldisplay S/vectorB·ˆn dS−/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl/bracketrightBigg +/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vcharge/line ×/vectorB)·/vectordl (15) and equation (14) to equation E=−/contintegraldisplay l∂/vectorA ∂t·/vectordl+/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vcharge/line ×/vectorB)·/vectordl (16) because the drift velocity is always parallel to the line ele ment /vectordland, consequently, the integral containing it is zero. We have introduced the ne w notation vcharge/line for remembering that we are dealing with the velocity of the char ge that, in this case, can be replaced by the velocity of the circuit element that co ntains it. It is worth stressing again that, when the magnetic field does not depend on time, equation (15) cannot be read in terms of flux variation, since the sum of the first two terms under square brackets is zero as it is the equivalent term of e quation (16) containing the time derivative of the vector potential. When part of the circuit is made by extended material, the cal culation of the drift velocity contribution to the induced emfis not an easy task, since the distribution of current lines in the material may be very complicated.8In section 3.2.6 and 3.2.7 we shall treat particularly simple cases with a circular sym metry. In all other cases, we shall neglect the drift velocity in the calculation of the induced emf(look at the end of section 3.2.6 for a further discussion of this point). 3.2 How it works in specific cases We shall now discuss some cases widely treated in literature , in order to see how the general law (and the flux rule) can be applied to specific probl ems. 8The distribution of currents in extended materials have bee n studied since the mid of eigh- teenth century. The following references are those that I kn ow: E. Jochmann, “On the electric currents induced by a magnet in a rotating conductor”, Phil. Mag. ,27, (1864), 506 - 528; Phil. Mag.,28, (1864), 347 - 349; H. Hertz, ‘On induction in rotating spher es’, in Miscellaneous papers, (J.A. Barth, Leipzig) 1895, pp. 35 - 126. A discussion of some aspects of Hertz’s work can be found in: Jed Z. Buchwald, The creation of scientific effects - Heinrich Hertz and electric waves, (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London) 1994, pp. 95 - 103; the papers by Boltz- mann and Corbino quoted in footnotes 12; 13. V. Volterra, “Su lle correnti elettriche in una lamina metallica sotto l’azione di un campo magnetico”, Il Nuovo Ci mento, 9, 23 - 79 (1915). One should also see the literature on eddy currents. 63.2.1 When a bar is moving /G54/G42 /G32/G31 /G41 /G69/G76 Figure 1: the conducting bar A, of length a, moves with constant velocity /vector vin a uniform and constant magnetic field /vectorBperpendicular to and entering the page. The barAslides on the conducting frame T. A steady current icirculates in the circuit T21. Let us consider the circuit of fig. 1. The conducting bar A, of length a, slides with constant velocity /vector vover the conducting frame Tin a uniform and constant magnetic field /vectorBperpendicular to the plane of the frame and entering the page : the frame Tis at rest with respect to the source of the magnetic field. A st eady current flows along the direction indicated in the figure. Not ice that in this case we can neglect without approximation the drift velocity of t he charge because it is always directed along the integration line (owing to the Hal l effect). According to the general law (16), the first integral is zero as zero is sum o f the first two terms of equation (15): as a matter of fact, if we choose the counter clockwise direction for the line integral, we obtain for the sum of these two terms: Bav line−Bav line= 0 (17) The induced electromotive force is then given by: E=Bav charge/line (18) The surviving term is the one coming from the magnetic compon ent of Lorentz force. Moreover, the theory predicts that the emfis localized into the bar: the bar acts as a battery and, as a consequence, between the two points 1 an d 2 of the frame that are in contact with the bar, one should measure a potenti al difference given by V1−V2=E −ir, where iis the circulating current and ris the resistance of the bar. Finally, it is worth stressing that the energy balance shows that the magnetic component of Lorentz force plays the role of an intermediary : the electrical energy dissipated in the circuit comes from the work done by the forc e that must be applied to keep the bar moving with constant velocity. 7Let us now recall how the flux rule deals with this case. It pred icts an emfgiven byBav line. In the light of the general law (15) and of its discussion, we understand why the flux rule predicts correctly the value of the emf: the reason lies in the fact that the two line integrals under square brackets cancel eac h other. However, we have shown above that the physics embedded in the general equ ation (15) forbids to read equation (18) as the result of: E=Bav line+ [−Bav line+Bav line] =Bav line (19) that leaves operative the first term coming from the flux varia tion. Before leaving this subject, it is worth saying something ab out the long debate about the meaning of ‘localized emf’. With reference to the moving bar, we can proceed as follows. The points 1 and 2 divide the circuit into two parts: the one on the left obeys Ohm law ∆ V=iRand the current enters it at point 1 at higher potential and leaves it at point 2 at lower potential; the par t on the right does not obeys Ohm law and the current enters it at point 2 at lower pote ntial and leaves it at point 1 at higher potential. We say that the emfis localized in the right part of the circuit: it can be experimentally distinguished from th e other. 3.2.2 The Faraday disc: 1 A conducting disc is rotating with constant angular velocit yωin a uniform and constant magnetic field /vectorBperpendicular to the disc and entering the page (fig. 2). A conducting frame DABC makes conducting contacts with the center and a point on the periphery of the disc. A steady current icirculates as indicated by the arrow. By applying the general laws (16) or (15) to the integration l ine at rest ABCDA , we see that, if we neglect the contribution of the drift veloc ity: •since the magnetic field does not depend on time, the first inte gral in (16) is zero •equivalently, the sum of the first two integrals in (15) is zer o. In the present case, each of the two terms is zero: the flux associated with th e circuit does not change and /vector vlineis zero everywhere, since the integration line has been chosen at rest •the only surviving term is the one due to the magnetic compone nt of Lorentz force and its value is given by (we are taking the countercloc kwise direction for the line integration): E=1 2ωBR2(20) where Ris the disc radius. In doing this calculation, we have neglec ted - as explained at the end of section 3.1, the charge drift velocit y (we shall take it into account in section 3.2.7). 8/G41 /G42 /G69/G43/G44 /G43 /G20 /G27/G42 Figure 2: the Faraday disc. A conducting disc rotates with co nstant angular velocity ωin a uniform and constant magnetic field /vectorBperpendicular to and entering the plane of the disc. A conducting frame DABC makes conducting contacts with the center and a point on the periphery of the disc. A steady cu rrenticirculates as indicated by the arrow. Of course, the emfgiven by equation (20) is induced along any radius, as it can b e seen by considering the circuit ABCC′DA. If the radius C′Dis considered at rest, the case is the same as that of the circuit ABCDA discussed just before. If the radius C′Dis considered in motion with angular velocity ω, we see again, both from equation (16) and equation (15), that the only surviving ter m is the one due to the magnetic component of Lorentz force with the only difference that, now, the first term of equation (15) (1 /2)ωBR2is cancelled out by the second −(1/2)ωBR2, due to the movement of the line elements of the radius DC′; the line elements lying on theCC′arc give a null contribution. Let us now see how the flux rule deals with the Faraday disc. If w e choose the linesat rest ABCDA orABCC′DA, we find that the induced emfis zero; if we choose the integration line ABCC′DA, with the radius C′Dconsidered in motion , we obtain the correct result E= (1/2)ωBR2. As in the case of the moving bar, the flux rule gets the correct r esult only because the two line integrals under square brackets in equation (15 ) cancel each other. As in the case of the moving bar, the physics embedded in the ge neral equation forbids an interpretation of the mathematical result in ter ms of flux variation: again the physical origin of the induced emfis due to the intermediacy of the magnetic component of Lorentz force. 93.2.3 The unipolar induction /G45/G41 /G42 /G43/G44 /G20 /G27/G44/G69 /G4D Figure 3: the unipolar induction. A conducting cylindrical magnet rotates about its axis in a counterclockwise direction. A conducting frame ABCD makes conducting contacts between a point on the axis of the magnet and a point o n its surface. A steady current icirculates as indicated by the arrow. The so called unipolar induction is illustrated in fig. 3. Whe n the cylindrical and conducting magnet Mrotates about its axis with angular velocity ωin the counterclockwise direction, a current flows in the circuit a s indicated by the arrow. It is easy to see that the discussion of the unipolar inductio n can be reduced to that of the Faraday disc for both general law and flux rule: the general law applied to the circuit ABCDEA at rest yields an emfinduced in the radius DEgiven by (1/2)ωBDE2, while the flux rule applied to the same circuit predicts a zer oemf. If one consider instead the integration line ABCDD′EAwith the radius D′Ein motion, analogous to the path ABCC′DAof fig. 2 concerning the Faraday disc, one can follow the same arguments developed in that case. 10/G42 /G76/G41 /G43 /G44 /G45 /G46/G43 /G27 /G44 /G27/G47 /G4D Figure 4: Kaempffer’s example. The circuit DEFGAC is closed by the conducting magnet Mthat is moving to the right with constant velocity /vector v. The magnet is sufficiently long in the direction perpendicular to the page s o that there is a magnetic field only within the magnet. There is no induced emfin spite of the fact that there is a flux change through the circuit at rest ACDEFGA . 3.2.4 The flux varies, but. .. In fig. 4 a case discussed by Scanlon, Henriksen and Allen9and originally due to Kaempffer10is presented. When the conducting magnet Mmoves, as indicated, with constant velocity /vector v, there is no induced emf- if the magnet is sufficiently long in the direction perpendicular to the page so that there is a m agnetic field only within the magnet. If we consider the integration line ACDEFGA at rest, there is a flux variation without induced emf. Also in this case, we must choose ad hoc the integration line - for instance the line ACC′D′DEFGA , where the segment C′D′ moves with the magnet - if we want to save the flux rule. On the ot her hand, the general law works well, whatever integration line is chosen . 3.2.5 The ‘rocking plates’ This is one of the two ‘exceptions to the flux rule’ discussed b y Feynman, Leighton and Sands (fig. 5).11The two plates oscillate slowly back and forth so that their 9P.J. Scanlon, R.N. Henriksen and J.R. Allen, “Approaches to electromagnetic induction”, Am. Jour. Phys., 37, pp. 705 - 706 (1969). 10F. A. Kaempffer, Elements of Physics (Blaisdell Publ. Co., Waltham, Mass., 1967), p. 164; quoted by Scanlon, Henriksen and Allen. 11R. Feynman, R. Leighton and M. Sands The Feynman Lectures on Physics , (Addison Wesley, Reading, Ma., 1964 ), pp. 17 - 3. 11/G50/G50 /G27 /G42/G41 /G43 Figure 5: the ‘rocking plates’. Two conducting plates oscil late back and forth in a uniform and constant magnetic field perpendicular to the pla tes. point of contact moves from PtoP′and viceversa. The circuit is closed by a wire that connects point AandC. The magnetic field /vectorBis perpendicular to the plates and enters the page. The authors write: If we imagine the “circuit” to be completed through the plate s on the dotted line shown in the figure, the magnetic flux through this circuit changes by a large amount as the plates are rocked back and for th. Yet the rocking can be done with small motions, so that /vector v×/vectorBis very small and there is practically no emf. According to the general law (15) the sum of the first two terms of equation (15) must be zero. Hence: /contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl=−d dt/integraldisplay S/vectorB·ˆn dS (21) Therefore, the third term of equation (15) coming from the ma gnetic component of Lorentz force equals the magnetic flux variation changed in s ign, if, of course, we assume that the charge velocity can be taken equal to the velo city of the element of conductor that contains it (the drift velocity is neglected ). The conclusion is that there is an induced emf: its average value is given by −∆φ/∆twhere ∆ φis the flux variation between the two extreme positions of the plate s and ∆ tthe interval of time taken in going from one position to the other: the indu cedemfgets smaller and smaller as ∆ tgets larger and larger; when the motion of the plates is very s low, we can conclude with Feynman that ‘there is practically no emf’. Notice that the induced emfchanges in sign (and the current its direction) when the the r ocking motion is reversed. 123.2.6 The Corbino disc The discussion of this case will show how the charge drift vel ocity, always neglected before, plays its role in the building up of the induced elect romotive field and, there- fore, of the induced emf. In 1911, Corbino studied theoretically and experimentall y the case of a conducting disc with a hole at its center. If a vol tage is applied between the inner and the outer periphery of the disc, a radial curren t will flow, provided that the experimental setup is realized in a way suitable for maintaining the cir- cular symmetry: the inner and outer periphery are covered by highly conducting electrodes; therefore, the inner and outer periphery are tw o equipotential lines. If a uniform and constant magnetic field is applied perpendicula rly to the disc, a circular current will flow in the disc.12 The first theoretical treatment of this case is due, as far as I know, to Boltz- mann who wrote down the equations of motion of charges in comb ined electric and magnetic fields.13Corbino, apparently not aware of this fact, obtained the sam e equations already developed by Boltzmann. However, while B oltzmann focused on magnetoresistance effects, Corbino interpreted the theore tical results in terms of radial and circular currents and studied experimentally th e magnetic effects due to the latter ones. The application of the general law of electromagnetic induc tion to this case leads to the same results usually obtained (as Boltzmann and Corbi no did) by writing down and solving the equations of motion of the charges in an e lectromagnetic field (by taking into account, explicitly or implicitly, the scat tering processes). IfIradialis the radial current, the radial current density J(r) will be: J(r) =Iradial 2πrs(22) and the radial drift velocity: v(r)drift=Iradial 2πrsne(23) 12O.M. Corbino, “Azioni elettromagnetiche dovute agli ioni d ei metalli deviati dalla traiettoria normale per effetto di un campo”, Il Nuovo Cimento 1, 397 - 419 (1911). A german translation of this paper appeared in Phys. Zeits., 12, 561 - 568 (1911). For a historical reconstruction see: S. Galdabini and G. Giuliani, “Magnetic field effects and dualis tic theory of metallic conduction in Italy (1911 - 1926): cultural heritage, epistemological be liefs, and national scientific community”, Ann. Science 48, 21 - 37 (1991). As pointed out by von Klitzing, the quantum Ha ll effect may be considered as an ideal (and quantized) version of the Corb ino effect corresponding to the case in which the current in the disc, with an applied radial volta ge, is only circular: K. von Klitzing, “The ideal Corbino effect”, in: P.E. Giua ed., Commemorazione di Orso Mario Corbino , (Centro Stampa De Vittoria, Roma, 1987), pp. 43 - 58. 13L. Boltzmann, Anzeiger der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wisse nschaften in Wien, 23, (1886), 77 - 80; Phil. Mag., 22, (1886), 226 - 228. 13where sis the thickness of the disc, nthe electron concentration and ethe electron charge. In the present case the general law of electromagnet ic induction assumes the simple form of equation (8) with vcharge =vdrift; therefore, the induced emf around a circle of radius ris given by: Ecircular =/contintegraldisplay2πr 0(/vector v(r)drift×/vectorB)·/vectordr=IradialB sne(24) The circular current dI(r)circular flowing in a circular strip of radius rand section s·drwill be, if ρis the resistivity: dIcircular =Ecircular sdr ρ2πr=µB 2πIradialdr r(25) and the total circular current: Icircular =µB 2πIradiallnr2 r1(26) where µis the electron mobility, r1andr2the inner and outer radius of the disc (we have used the relation µ= 1/ρne). Equation (26) is the same as that derived and experimentally tested by Corbino. The power dissipated in the disc is: W= (I2R)radial+ (I2R)circular =I2 radialRradial(1 +µ2B2) (27) where we have used equation (26) and the two relations: Rradial =ρ 2πslnr2 r1(28) Rcircular =ρ2 s21 Rradial(29) Equation (27) shows that the phenomenon may be described as d ue to an increased resistance Rradial(1 +µ2B2): this is the magnetoresistance effect. The circular in- duced emfis ‘distributed’ homogeneously along each circle. Each cir cular strip of section s·dracts as a battery that produces current in its own resistance : therefore, the potential difference between two points arbitrarily cho sen on a circle is zero. Hence, as it must be, each circle is an equipotential line. The above application of the general law yields a descriptio n of Corbino disc that combine Boltzmann (magnetoresistance effects) and Cor bino (circular currents) point of view and shows how the general law can be applied to ph enomena tradition- ally considered outside the phenomenological domain for wh ich it has been derived. 143.2.7 The Faraday disc: 2 The discussion of Corbino disc helps us in better understand ing the physics of the Faraday disc. Let us consider a Faraday disc in which the circ ular symmetry is conserved. This may be difficult to realize; anyway, it is inte resting to discuss it. As shown above, the steady condition will be characterized by t he flow of a radial and of a circular current. The mechanical power needed to keep th e disc rotating with constant angular velocity ωis equal to the work per unit time done by the magnetic field on the rotating radial currents. Then, it will be given b y: W=/integraldisplay2π 0/integraldisplayr2 r1(Jradialr dα s)(B dr)(ω r) =Iradial1 2ω B(r2 2−r2 1) (30) where the symbols are the same as those used in the previous se ction. The point is that the term E=1 2ω B(r2 2−r2 1) (31) is the induced emfdue only to the motion of the disc. This emfis the primary source of the induced currents, radial and circular. Theref ore, the physics of the Faraday disc with circular symmetry, may be summarized as fo llows: a) the source of the induced currents is the induced emfdue to the rotation of the disc b) the primary product of the induced emfis a radial current c) the drift velocity of the radial current produces in turn a circular induced emf that give rise to the circular current 4 General law and flux rule The cases discussed above must be considered as illustrativ e examples. Obviously, the conceptual foundations of the general law and of the flux r ule can be discussed without any reference to particular cases. The general law h as been already dealt with in great detail. Let us now focus our attention on the flux rule. Let us define - this, of course, is not our choice - the induced emfas E=/contintegraldisplay l/vectorE·/vectordl (32) where /vectorEobeys Maxwell equations. As shown above (equations 5 - 6), th is leads immediately to the conclusion that the induced emfis given by: E=/contintegraldisplay l/vectorE·/vectordl=−d dt/integraldisplay S/vectorB·ˆn dS−/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl (33) 15or, in terms of the vector potential, by (equations 10 - 11): E=/contintegraldisplay l/vectorE·/vectordl=−/contintegraldisplay l∂/vectorA ∂t·/vectordl (34) and is always zero when ∂/vectorB/∂t = 0. Of course, this result is not satisfactory, if we want to save the flux rule. There- fore, one may suggest to define the induced emfas: E=/contintegraldisplay l/vectorE·/vectordl+/contintegraldisplay l(/vector vline×/vectorB)·/vectordl=−d dt/integraldisplay S/vectorB·ˆn dS (35) thus reestablishing the flux rule. This is, for instance, the choice made by Scanlon, Henriksen and Allen.14However: •since the velocity appearing in equation (35) is clearly the velocity of the line element /vectordl, this definition has no physical meaning. •the definition is ad hoc . As a consequence, as in the paper by Scanlon, Hen- riksen and Allen, the line of integration must be chosen ad hoc for obtaining predictions in accordance with the experimental findings. 5 Conclusions The straightforward application of two fundamental laws of electromagnetism – Maxwell equation rot/vectorE=−∂/vectorB/∂t and Lorentz law /vectorF=q(/vectorE+/vector v×/vectorB) – leads to a general law for electromagnetic induction phenomena: it i ncludes, as a particular case, the standard flux rule. The treatment given in this pape r shows that standard derivations: a) Fail to recognize that the velocity involved in the integr ation of Maxwell equa- tion (2) is the velocity of the line elements composing the cl osed path of integration and notthe velocity of the charges. b) Overlook the fact that the expression of Lorentz force con stitutes a fundamen- tal postulate not included in Maxwell equations; this postu late not only gives physical meaning to the fields solutions of Maxwell equation s – when applied to charges – but allows also the prediction of new phenomena. c) In relevant cases, when a part of the circuit is moving, the y are misleading as far as the physical origin of the phenomenon is concerned: th ey attribute the effect to a flux variation when, instead, the origin lies in the intermediacy of the magnetic component of Lorentz force. 14P.J. Scanlon, R.N. Henriksen and J.R. Allen, “Approaches to electromagnetic induction”, Am. Jour. Phys., 37, (1969), p. 701. 16Finally, the present derivation: •provides with a rigorous mathematical treatment the statem ent according to which electromagnetic induction phenomena are the product of two indepen- dent processes: time variation of magnetic field and effects o f magnetic field on moving charges. •yields a law that can be successfully applied to phenomena - t hose presented by Corbino disc - till now considered outside the phenomenol ogical domain of electromagnetic induction. Acknowledgements . The author would like to thank Ilaria Bonizzoni for a critic al reading of the manuscript and Giuliano Bellodi and Gianluca Introzzi for valuable discussions. 17

arXiv:physics/0008008v1 [physics.acc-ph] 3 Aug 2000SUPPRESSION OF BEAM BREAKUP INSTABILITYINALONG TRAIN BYINTRODUCING ENERGYSPREAD BETWEENTHE BUNCHES∗ G. V. Stupakov,SLAC, Stanford, CA 94309,USA Abstract InteractionbetweenthebunchesintheNLCmainlinacvia longrangewakefieldscancauseabeambreakupinstability. Although the magnitude of the long range wakefields for an ideal NLC structure is below the instability threshold, thewakeincreaseswhenstructuremanufacturingerrorsare taken into account. In case of large errors, the developing instability can result in the projected emittance dilution of the bunch train. To suppress the instability, we propose to introduceanenergyspreadbetweenthebunches,similarto the BNS energy spread for damping of the beam breakup within a single bunch [1]. Based on simple estimates, we show that the energy spread of order of 1-2% should be enough for suppression of the instability. The results of computersimulationswith the simulation code LIAR con- firm theoretical estimates and indicate that both the toler- ances for structure misalignments and the incoming beam jitter can be considerably loosened by introducing the en- ergyspreadwithinthebeam. 1 INTRODUCTION Interaction between the bunches in the NLC linac via the longrangewakefieldscancauseabeambreakupinstability [2], similar to thebeam breakupwithin a single bunchthat is caused by short range wakes [3]. This instability, if se- vere, imposestight toleranceson the beam injection errors aswell asstructuremisalignmentsin thelattice. An example of the the long-range wake for the NLC structures is shown in Fig. 1. This wake was calculated assuming a random frequency error of the dipole mode in the structure with the rms spread of 3 MHz [4]. Note that incontrasttotheshort-rangewakefield,thatcanusuallybe approximated by a linear function, the long-range wake is a complicatedoscillatingfunctionofthebunchposition. One can try to estimate the projected normalized emit- tance growth ∆ǫof a trainof bunchescausedbyrandomly misaligned structures in the linac using the result of Ref. [5]fortheexpectationvalueof ∆ǫ /angbracketleft∆ǫ/angbracketright=δy2r2 eN2¯β0NsL2 s/angbracketleft∆S2/angbracketright1−(γ0/γf)1/2 γ1/2 0γ3/2 f,(1) where δyis the rms structures offset in the linac, reis the classical electron radius, Nis the number of particles in the bunch, ¯β0is the average value of the beta function at the beginning of the linac, Nsis the number of structures in thelinac, Lsis the lengthofthe structure, γ0andγfare the initial and final relativistic factors of the beam, and S ∗Work supported by DOEcontract DE-AC03-76SF00515.-101w/j72V/j144/j13pC/j144/j13mm /j144/j13m/j76 0 20 40 60 80 s/j72m/j76-2-101S/j72V/j144/j13pC/j144/j13mm /j144/j13m/j76 Figure 1: Transverse wake wand the corresponding sum wakeSfor NLC linac with 3 MHz rms frequency error in the dipole modes. Each point corresponds to a single bunch. The total number of bunches in the train is 95 and the spacingbetweenthe bunchesis83cm. is the sum wake. The k-th componentof Sis defined as a sum of the transverse wakes wigenerated by all bunches precedingthe bunchnumber k(withS1=w1= 0), Sk=k/summationdisplay i=1wi. (2) The quantity ∆Sis thedifferencebetween Sandtheaver- agevalue /angbracketleftS/angbracketright,∆Sk=Sk− /angbracketleftS/angbracketright,with /angbracketleftS/angbracketright=1 NbNb/summationdisplay k=1Sk, /angbracketleft∆S2/angbracketright=1 NbNb/summationdisplay k=1∆S2 k,(3) where Nbis the numberof bunches. Eq. (2) is derivedas- sumingalatticewiththebetafunctionsmoothlyincreasing alongthelinacas ¯β∼E1/2. NotethatEq. (2)isonlyvalid if there is no beam break up instability, and hence gives a minimalemittancegrowthforgivenmisalignment. For the wake shown in Fig. 1, /angbracketleft∆S2/angbracketright1/2= 0.59 V/pC/m/mm. Using the nominal NLC parameters: N= 1.1·1010,¯β= 7m,Ns= 4969,Ls= 1.8m,E0= 10GeV,Ef= 500GeV,andassuming δy= 10µmonefinds /angbracketleft∆ǫ/angbracketright= 2.9·10−10m, which is about 1% of the nominal beam emittance at the beginningof the linac, ǫ= 3·10−8 m. However, computer simulations for this case with the wake shown in Fig. 1 demonstrate the projectedemittance growth in the train of order of 50%, (see Fig. 2), that is much larger than the above estimate. The reason for such large emittance dilution is the development of the beam breakup instability due to the long-rangewakefields in the bunchtrainreflectedin quasi-exponentialgrowthinFig.2. To suppress the instability, one can try to introduce an en- 0 2500 5000 7500 10000 s/j72m/j7600.20.4/j68/j101y/j144/j13 /j101y Figure 2: Relative emittancegrowthalongthe linac in the train of bunches, for 10 µm rms structure misalignments, when all bunches have the same energy. The bunches are simulated as single particles, so that there is no emittance growthwithinthebunch. ergyspreadinthetrainofbunches[6],similartotheenergy spread within a bunch that is routinely use for the BNS dampingofasinglebunchbeambreakup. 2 ESTIMATE OFREQUIRED ENERGY SPREAD To obtain a rough estimate of the energy spread required to suppress the long range beam break up instability, we use the autophasingcondition for the BNS dampingin the two-particlemodelfora FODO lattice[7,8] δ=Ne2wl2 cell 24E/parenleftbigg 1 +3 2ctn2µ 2/parenrightbigg , (4) where δistherelativeenergydifferencebetweentheparti- cles,Nis the number of particles in the macroparticle, w is the transverse wake, Eis the beam energy, µis the be- tatronphaseadvancepercellintheFODOlattice,and lcell is the cell length. The value of δgiven by Eq. (4) would be enoughforsuppressionofthebeambreakupinstability between the two macroparticles with the interaction char- acterizedbythewake w. To apply Eq. (4) for a train of bunches, we use the rms value of the wake shown in Fig. 1,wrms= 0.36V/pC/m/mm. The quantity F≡ l2 cell/parenleftbig 1 +3 2ctn2µ 2/parenrightbig /(24E)fromEq. (4)wascalculatedfor the NLC lattice as a function of distance s, see Fig. 3. For the estimate, we use the average value of Fav= 0.54 m2/GeV. Finally, we need to relate the quantity δto the 0 2500 5000 7500 10000 s,/LParen1m/RParen100.51F,/LParen1m2/Slash1 GeV/RParen1 Figure3: Function F(s)fortheNLClattice. energy spread in the train. Since Eq. (4) was derived for two macroparticles, one can expect thatδrefers to the en- ergy difference between the adjacent bunches in the train . Hence, the requiredenergyspread in the train for suppres- sion of the instability is equal to δmultiplied by the total numberofbunchesinthetrain, δtrain≈Nbδ. We cannow estimate δtrainasNbNe2wrmsFav, whichgives δtrain≈0.03. (5) This shouldbe comparedwith the energyspread of the or- der of 1% within the bunch introducedfor the BNS damp- ingoftheshort-rangebeambreakupinstability. A more detailed theory of the beam breakup instability in atrainwith theenergychirpcanbefoundinRef. [9]. 3 COMPUTER SIMULATIONS WecarriedoutcomputersimulationsusingLIARcode[10] withvariableenergyspreadinthetrainforthewakeshown in Fig. 1. Inthesesimulations,thebunchesweretreatedas macroparticles to suppress the effect of short range wake- fields. We usedtwotypesofenergyprofilesinthetrain. In the first case, the energy in the train varied linearly so that ∆Ek=−e(s)k, where kisthe bunchnumberinthe train, ande(s)is the energyslope. The rmsenergyspreadin the train∆Ein this case is ∆E(s) =|e(s)|Nb/√ 12. An ex- ample of the profile of ∆E(s)along the linac is shown in Fig. 4— theenergyspreadwasgeneratedatthebeginning of the linac, and taken out at the end, so that the final en- ergyspreadwasclosetozero. Wealsousedanexponential energyprofileinthetrain ∆Ek=e(s)[1−exp(−3k/Nb)] with the same functionalformofthe rms ∆E(s)asshown in Fig.4. In the first set of simulations, all structures were ran- domly misaligned with rms value of 10 µm. The energy spread in the train varied by scaling the profile shown in0 2500 5000 7500 10000 s/j72m/j7600.010.02/j68E/j144/j13E Figure 4: Variation of the relative energy spread ∆E/E alongthelinac. - 0.02 - 0.01 0 0.01 0.02 /j72 /j68E /j144E /j76max00.20.4/j68/j101y/j144 /j101y 12 Figure 5: Relative emittance increase in the train of bunches as a function of the maximum rms energy spread inthetrain. Curve1correspondstoalinearvariationofthe energy,andcurve2— toexponentialfunction ∆Ek. Fig.4andthefinaleffectiveemittanceofthetrainwascal- culated as a function of the maximum rms energy spread (∆E/E)max(approximately at s≈8000m). The result is shown in Fig. 5. Positive values of (∆E/E)maxcor- respond to the BNS-like energy profile, when the energy decreases toward the tail of the bunch and negative values of(∆E/E)maxcorrespondtotheoppositeslopeoftheen- ergyprofile. Aswesee,thepositivevaluesof (∆E/E)max are moreeffectiveinsuppressionoftheemittancegrowth. In the second set of simulations, the train was initially offset by 1 µm (with all structures and quadrupoles per- fectlyaligned). Theresultingemittancegrowthofthebeam as a function of (∆E/E)maxis shown in Fig. 6. Again, we see that the energyspread of the order of 1% results in much smaller emittance growth then for the bunches with the sameenergy. 4 DISCUSSION An energy spread between the bunches in the NLC is nat- urally generatedin the linac by the beamloadingeffect. A-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 /j72 /j68E /j144E /j76max0.250.50.7511.25/j68/j101y/j144 /j101y 12 Figure 6: Relative emittance increase as a functionof the energyspread for initial train offset of 1 µm. Curve 1 cor- respondstoa linearvariationoftheenergy,andcurve2— to exponentialfunction ∆Ek. special compensation scheme in the present NLC design will correct the energy spread to a minimal value. With a slight modification of the compensation scheme, it should alsoabletointroduceasmallcontrollableenergyspreadre - quired for the long-range BNS damping, as studied in this paper. Another option of generating the energyspread be- tweenthe bunchesisusingRFQ magnets. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TheauthorthanksT.Raubenheimerforusefuldiscussions. 6 REFERENCES [1] V. E. Balakin, A. V. Novokhatsky and V. P. Smirnov. Proc. International Conference on High-Energy Accelera- tors, Batavia, 1983 , pp. 119-120, 1984. [2] K. Thompson and R.D.Ruth, Phys.Rev. ,D41, 964 (1990). [3] A.W.Chao,B.RichterandC.Y.Yao, Nucl.Instrum.Meth. , 178, 1(1980). [4] Wakefield for RDDS1C Incl HOM Ref and 4 CellsDecou- pled computed byR. Jones. [5] K. L. Bane, C. Adolphsen, K. Kubo and K. A. Thompson, SLAC-PUB-6581, Presented at 4th European Particle Ac- celerator Conference (EPAC 94) , London, England, 27 Jun - 1Jul 1994. [6] G. V. Stupakov, NLC note LCC-0027, SLAC, September 1999. [7] A.W.Chao, PhysicsofCollectiveBeamInstabilitiesinHigh Energy Accelerators (Wiley,New York, year1993). [8] NLCZDRDesignGroupandNLCPhysicsWorkingGroup. Physics and technology of the next linear collider: a report submitted toSnowmass '96 , SLAC-R-0485, 1996. [9] C.L.BohnandK.-Y.Ng.PaperMOA01,theseProceedings. [10] R. Assmannet al.SLAC-AP-103,SLAC,April 1997.

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A BEAM-ENERGY-SPREAD MONITOR USING MULTI-STRIPLINE ELECTRODES T. Suwada* , High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan * E-mail address: tsuyoshi.suwada@kek.jpAbstract A beam-energy-spread monitor is under development in order to control and stabilize the energy spread of high- current single-bunch electron beams for producing a sufficient number of positrons. The author has proposed a new monitor using multi-stripline electrodes in order to reinforce this purpose. This report describes the basic design of the monitor based on a numerical analysis. The analysis result shows that the resolution of an energy- spread measurement is expected to be less than 0.3% for nominal operation conditions. 1 INTRODUCTION The KEK B-Factory (KEKB) project[1] is progressing in order to test CP violation in the decay of B mesons. KEKB is an asymmetric electron-positron collider comprising 3.5-GeV positron and 8-GeV electron rings. The KEKB injector linac[2] was upgraded in order to inject single-bunch positron and electron beams directly into the KEKB rings. The beam charges are designed to be 0.64 nC/bunch and 1.3 nC/bunch with a maximum repetition rate of 50 Hz for the positron and electron beams, respectively. High-current primary electron beams (~10 nC/bunch) are required in order to generate a sufficient number of positrons. Since the KEKB is a factory machine, a well-controlled operation of the injector linac is required for minimizing the tuning time and maximizing stable operation. Stable control of the beam positions and energies at several sectors throughout the beam-position and energy feedback systems[3] are essential in daily operation; however, the energy spread of the primay electron beams is often enlarged due to a long- term phase drift of high-power and booster klystrons. Thus, beam diagnostic and monitoring tools are required to cure the beam energy spread; furthermore those are also expected to control the longitudinal wakefields of the high-current primary electron beams pulse-by-pulse, especially at the 180-degree arc of the injector linac. A beam-energy-spread monitor (BESM) with multi-stripline electrodes is one of the very useful monitoring tools for satisfying such requirements. The monitor has been newly designed based on a numerical analysis involving a multipole analysis of the electromagnetic field generated by charged beams. The BESM detects the spread of beam sizes at large dispersion secions by detecting any variation of the electromagnetic field distribution induced in the monitor with the multi-stripline electrodes;thus, thefollowing method can be applied to not only measuring the energy spread, but also to measuring the transverse spatial structure of the beam. 2 MULTIPOLE ANALYSIS The electromagnetic field generated by relativistic charged beams inside a conducting duct is almost boosted in the transverse direction to the beam axis due to Lorentz contraction. This phenomenon shows that if the wall loss of the image charges is negligibly small, the electromagnetic coupling of the inner surface of the duct to the beams can be well treated as a two-dimentional electrostatic potential problem. Thus, any derivation of the image charges induced on the duct is simply attributed to the electrostatic potential problem on the transverse plane. For a conducting round duct, the image charges induced by a line charge can be solved as a boundary problem in which the electrostatic potential is equal on the duct[4]. The formula for the image charge density (j) is given by j r RI r RR r R r rR( , , , )( , ) cos( ), φ θφ π θ φ=− + − − 2 22 2 2 2 (1) where (r,φ) and (R,θ) are the polar coordinates of the line charge and the pickup point on the duct, respectively; R is the duct radius; and I is the line charge (see fig.1). The formula can also be represented by expanding in power series of r/R, j r RI r Rr Rkk k( , , , )( , )cos ( ) . φ θφ πθ φ = + − ∑    =∞ 21 2 1 (2) Line Charge I(r,φ) Conducting Vacuum Duct RPickup( R,θ) θ=π/ 8 xy θ= 3π/8 θ= 13 π/8θ= 5π/8 θ= 7π/8 θ= 9π/8 θ= 11 π/8θ= 15 π/8 Figure 1: Polar coordinates of a line charge and eight pickups defined in a conducting duct.If the transverse distribution of a traveling beam is according to a Gaussian function inside the duct, the total image charge (J) is formulated by integrating the image charge density with a weight of the Gaussian distribution inside the duct area, J RI Rj r R x x y ydxdyb x y( , ) ( , , , ) exp( )exp( ), ( )θ πφ θ σ σ= × − − − −∫∫       2 2 2302 202 2 where Ib is the beam charge, σx and σy are the horizontal and vertical root mean square (rms) half widths of the beam, respectively, and (x0,y0) is the charge center of the gravity of the beam. Assuming that the widths of the charge distribution are sufficiently small compared to the duct radius, σx,σy<<R, integration is easily performed by extending the integration area to x,y→±∞, as follows: J RI Rx Ry R Rx y Rx y Rb x y( , ) cos sin cos sin ,( )θ πθ θ σ σ θ θ≈ + + +− +−+           21 2 2 2 2 2 40 0 2 2 202 02 20 0 2 where the higher orders are neglected; the first to third expanded terms correspond to the monopole, dipole, quadrupole moments, respectively. The beam sizes are related to the quadrupole moment at the least order. Thus, a beam-size measurement can be performed to detect the quadrupole moment ( Jquad). The formula normalized to the total image charges is given by J J R d J R dquad≡∫ ∫( , )cos / ( , ) ,θ θ θ θ θπ π 2 02 02 (5) (6)=− +−   σ σx y Rx y R2 2 202 02 2. The quadrupole moment is dependent upon both of the beam positions and the sizes from the above formulas; however, the position dependence can be corrected by using the dipole moments. It is also approximately given by using the n-pickup amplitudes ( Vi [i=1-n]), Jquad kkn k kknV V≈∑ ∑ = =1 12cos / .θ (7) Normalization by summing the n-pickup amplitudes needs to cancel out the beam charge variation due to the beam jitter and the sensitivity dependence of the pickups due to the angular width of the electrodes. It is noticed that the absolute beam sizes can not be independentlyobtained, because the square difference (σx2- σy2) of the beam sizes is only related to the quarupole moment. This is because the equipotential lines are invariant under the condition σx2- σy2=const if the beam positions do not change. 3 NUMERICAL METHOD A numerical analysis was carried out based on a charge- simulation method[5] in order to calculate the voltages induced on the electrodes dependent on the beam position and sizes. Here, only a brief overview of this method is given (see ref.6 in detail). The method is based on the boundary element method for analyzing a two-dimentional electrostatic potential problem. In this method some boundary elements and imaginary charges are introduced in order to analyze an electrostatic-field system (see fig.2). All of the conductor surfaces in the system are divided into many domains, which are called “boundary elements”; imaginary charges are also arranged near to the boundary elements in a one-to-one manner. The electrostatic potential of each conductor can be calculated so as to satisfy the boundary conditions of the system, that is, so as that the calculated equipotential surfaces correspond to the conductor surfaces by using the linear superposition of the electrostatic field contributed by all of the real (beam) and imaginary charges. The goodness of the numerical analysis was investigated by analyzing the convergency of the electrostatic potentials calculated for each electrode in various segmentation numbers, while the transverse charge distribution obeyed a Gaussian function with a total horizontal (vertical) width of 6σx(σy), which was also segmented by using finite number of line charges with infinite length. The parameter ε/δ was tuned so as to produce good symmetrical and constant electrostatic potentials on the electrode surfaces. The calculation convergency was deduced to be better than 1%. The obtained parameters are summarized in Table 1. Duct center Outline point on the duct surface Outline point on the electrode surface Imaginary charge 2π/n Segmentation ( n)Segmen- tation ( m)ε δ Angular width (Δθ )abt Figure 2: Segmentation of the beam duct and electrode surface based on the charge-simulation method.Table 1: Parameters used in the numerical method Radial segementation m 4 Azimuthal segmentation n 240 δ/ε 0.6~0.7 4 APPLICATION TO THE BESM The number of the electrodes was decided by analyzing the convergency of σx2- σy2 using eq. (7), while the total angular width (2/3×2π) of the electrodes was constant. Figure 3 shows that good convergency was obtained at eight electrodes. The angular width should be carefully designed from a point of view in terms of the signal-to- noise ratio and the coupling strength between the electrodes[7] under the condition that the outer radius (b) and the electrode length (L) are fixed by replacing of the present beam-position monitor installed in the arc. An electrode with an angular width of 15 degree satisfies the above requirement and, furthermore, it is almost free from a direct strike on the electrode surface of which synchrotron radiations are generated at the entrance of the arc. The total angular width is 1/3×2π, viewed from the beam. For this angular width, the minimum detectable beam charge is estimated to be ~0.6 nC/bunch, analyzed based on the data of the present beam-position detection system[8]. The inner raidus ( a) should be determined so as to comprise a 50- Ω-transmission line. Table 2 shows the design paramters of the BESM. Based on the design parameters, Fig. 4 shows that using the design parameters the variation of the quadrupole moment to the energy spread (σE/E) expected at the 180-degree arc, where the horizontal dispersion is ηx=7.2 mm/% and the beam energy is 1.7 GeV, with various vertical beam sizes. The beam-position dependence was neglected in this analysis for the sake of simplicity. Assuming that the noise level of the pickup amplitudes is expected to be less than 0.5%, which determines the minimum detectable charge, the detection error of the energy spread is expected to be about 0.3%. Table 2: Design parameters of the BESM Inner radius a [mm] 20.6 Outer radius b [mm] 23.4 Angular width Δθ [deg.] 15 Electrode thickness t [mm] 1.5 Stripline length L [mm] 132.5 Number of electrodes 8 5 CONCLUSIONS A new beam-energy-spread monitor with eight-stripline electrodes was designed on the basis of the multipole anaysis for charged beams. Eight electrodes with each angular width of 15 degree are required to detect the precise quadrupole moment for a beam charge greater than 0.6 nC/bunch. The rms resolution of the energy-spread measurement is expected to be 0.3% for nominal operation conditions. This is small enough to stably transport high-current primary electron beams at the 180- degree arc in the injector linac.REFERENCES [1] KEKB B-Factory Design Report, KEK Report 95-7 (1995). [2] Design Report on PF Injector Linac Upgrade for KEKB, KEK Report 95-18, 1996. [3] K.Furukawa, et al., Proc. the Int’l Conf. on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems (ICALEPCS’99), Trieste, Italy, 1999, pp.248-250; KEK-Preprint 99-139 (1999). [4] J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics-2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York,1975), p.54. [5] T. Kohno and T. Takuma, Numerical Calculation Method of Electric Field (CORONA, Tokyo, 1980). [6] T. Suwada, Proc. the 11th Symposium on Accelerator Science and Technology , Akou-gun, Hyougo, Japan, 1997, pp.264-266; KEK Preprint 97-183 (1997). [7] T. Suwada, Proc. the 10th Symposium on Accelerator Science and Technology , Hitachinaka, Japan, 1995, pp.269-271; KEK Preprint 95-136 (1995). [8] T. Suwada, N.Kamikubota, H.Fukuma, N.Akasaka, and H.Kobayashi, Nucl. Instrum. & Methods. A 440 No.2 February (2000) pp.307-319. 5678910 0 5 10 15 20 25 30sx2-sy2 [mm2] Number of Electrodes Figure 3: Variation of the square difference of the beam sizes depending upon the number of electrodes. The horizontal and vertical beam sizes are assumed to be σy=3 and σy=1 mm, respectively. -0.2-0.100.10.20.3 0 0.5 1 1.5σy=0.1mm σy=2.1mm σy=4.1mmJquad Energy Spread ( sE/E) [%] Figure 4: Variation of the quadrupole moment to the energy spread expected at the 180-degree arc.

arXiv:physics/0008011v1 [physics.optics] 4 Aug 2000A Variational Approach in the Dissipative Nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger Equation Dagoberto S Freitas∗ Departamento de F´ ısica, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, 44031-460, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil. Jairo R de Oliveira† Departamento de F´ ısica e Matem´ atica, Universidade Feder al Rural de Pernambuco, 52171-030, Recife, PE, Brazil and Departament o de F´ ısica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50670-910, Recife, PE , Brazil. (February 2, 2008) Typeset using REVT EX ∗dfreitas@uefs.br †jrocha@lftc.ufpe.br 1Abstract The properties of pulse propagation in a nonlinear fiber incl uding linear damped term added in the usual nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equat ion is analyzed analytically. We apply variational modified approach based on the lagrangian that describe the dynamic of system and with a trial function we obtain a solution which is more accuracy when compared with a pertuba tive solution. As a result, the problem of pulse propagation in a fiber with lo ss can be described in good agreement with exact results. In recent years the propagation of optical pulses in fibers ha s obtained a great attention not only from the theoretical as well as from the experimenta l point of view. The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation (NLSE) has been employed to explain a variety of effects in the prop- agation of optical pulses. As is well known the balance betwe en the self-phase modulation (SPM) and group velocity dispersion (GVD) leads to the so cal led solitons solutions for the NLSE [1,2]. Solitary wave solutions have been known to exist in a variety of nonlinear and dispersive media for many years. In the context of optical co mmunications, Hasegawa and Tappent [3] first made the important observation that a pulse propagating in an optical fiber with Kerr-law nonlinearity can form an envelope solito n. This offered the potential for undistorted pulse transmission over very long distance s. Just as a balance between self-phase-modulation and group-velocity dispersion can lead to the formation of temporal solitons in single-mode fibers, it is also possible to have th e analogous spatial soliton, where diffraction and self-focusing can compensate for each other [2]. The importance of studying optical solitons is from the fact that their have potential a pplications in optical transmission and all-optical processing. A soliton is a particular solut ion of the nonlinear-wave equation. Since analytical solution are known for only a few cases, inv estigations into the properties solutions are normally performed numerically using such ap proaches. However, it is often desirable to have an analytical model describing the dynami cs of pulse propagation in a fiber. 2In the theoretical treatment of these problems, considerab le attention has been given to the variational approach [4,6]. A variational approach w as employed in [6] deriving information about the various parameters that characteriz e the beam, which are qualitatively as well as quantitatively, in good agreement with numerical results. This result invalidates the possibility of pulse compression without external grat ings which is erroneous and is only an artifact of the paraxial approximation. In the same sense Anderson [7] described the main characteristics of the temporal soliton as determined by NLSE. The discussion above does not consider the presence of the loss in the medium. It is well known that in real materials, the medium will not be purely transparent and the nonlinearity will not be of pure Kerr-law form, but will saturate. The problem of descri bing the physical properties of dissipative systems has been the subject of lengthily discu ssions [14,15]. These results were recently applied to the problem of propagation of cw (contin uous wave) Gaussian beams in a saturable medium with loss [13]. In that work [13] the diffrac tion is limited to one transverse solution. After that this problem was analyzed using a varia tional modified approach [16]. In this paper, we will analyses the dynamics interplay betwe en nonlinearity and disper- sion through optical medium with loss using a variational mo dified approach [16]. Exact analytical expressions for the behavior of the pulse are det ermined. The starting point of our analysis is the Nonlinear Schr¨ odi nger Equation that describe the propagation of a pulse envelope in a nonlinear loss mediu m, i∂u ∂ξ+1 2∂2u ∂τ2+u|u|2=−iΓu (1) where u(ζ, τ) is the normalized amplitude of the pulse, ξis the normalized coordinate, τis the normalized time, and Γ is the normalized loss parameter o f the medium. Now we can handle Eq.(1) adequately in the form, ∂ ∂τ∂ ∂u∗ τ/parenleftBig eΓξL/parenrightBig +∂ ∂ξ∂ ∂u∗ ξ/parenleftBig eΓξL/parenrightBig −∂ ∂u∗/parenleftBig eΓξL/parenrightBig = 0 (2) where L=1 2|∂u ∂t|2+i(u∂u∗ ∂ξ−u∗∂u ∂ξ)−1 2|u|4 3andu∗is complex conjugate of uand subindexes are the differentiation with respect to τand ξ.Lis the lagrangian of system without loss. The Eq.(2) is the Eu ler-Lagrange equation in the modified form that describe the propagation of the puls e in the medium with loss, and can be written in the form of the modified Hamilton’s princ iple [15,16], δ/integraldisplay∞ 0/integraldisplay∞ 0eΓξLdξdτ = 0 (3) Assuming a trial functional of the form u(ξ, τ) =A(ξ)sech/parenleftBiggτ w(ξ)/parenrightBigg exp (iφ(ξ)) , (4) where Ais the amplitude of the pulse propagated, wis the width and φphase term. Using Eq.(4) into the variational formulation, Eq.(3), we can int egrate the τdependence explicit to obtain δ/integraldisplay∞ 0eΓξ/angbracketleftL/angbracketrightdξ= 0, (5) where /angbracketleftL/angbracketright=|A|2 3w+ 2iw/parenleftBigg AdA∗ dξ−A∗dA dξ/parenrightBigg + 4w|A|2dφ dξ−2w|A|4 3(6) is the average of Lin the time. Then, from the standard calculus, deriving eΓξ/angbracketleftL/angbracketrightwith respect to A,A∗,wandφwe obtain the following system of coupled ordinary different ial equations d dξ/parenleftBig w|A|2/parenrightBig =−Γw|A|2(7) w2|A|2= 1 (8) 8w|A|2dφ dξ=8w|A|4 3−2|A|2 3w−4iw/parenleftBigg AdA∗ dξ−A∗dA dξ/parenrightBigg . (9) The equations above describe the characteristics of the pul se and solving these equations we will obtain the full dynamics of the pulse through the medi um. It is obvious that once 4Eq.(7) and Eq.(8) are solved for wand |A|2, the phase φis easily obtained from Eq.(9). In particular, if the longitudinal phase of the amplitude Ais introduced by writing A=|A|eiθ(ξ) the Eq.(9) can be written as d dξ(φ+θ) =1 4w2. (10) from it we obtain φ(ξ) +θ(ξ) =1 8Γw(0)2/parenleftBig 1−e−2Γξ/parenrightBig . (11) The equation above describe the regularized phase of the pul se. This system of equation has analytic solution. From Eq.(7) we obtain w(ξ)|A(ξ)|2=w(0)|A(0)|2e−Γξ. (12) The compatibility of Eqs.(12) and (8) is possible when |A(ξ)|=|A(0)|e−Γξ(13) and w(ξ) =w(0)eΓξ, (14) where was used the relation |A(0)|2= 1/w2(0), with A(0) and ω(0) is the initial amplitude and width of pulse, respectively . Now we can write the amplit ude A(ξ) =|A(0)|e−Γξeiθ(ξ). (15) Using the result above into the trial functional, Eq.(4), we can write the pulse in form u(ξ, τ) =|A(0)|e−Γξsech/parenleftBiggτ w(ξ)/parenrightBigg exp [i(φ(ξ) +θ(ξ))], (16) where the regularized phase φ(ξ) +θ(ξ) is given by Eq.(11) and width w(ξ) by Eq.(14). As would expect, the fiber loss is detrimental simply because the peak power decreases exponentially with the fiber length. As a result, the pulse wi dth of the fundamental soliton 5also increase with propagation, as seen in the figure. Howeve r, these results are qualitatively better than the results obtained by using the inverse scatte ring method where Γ is treated as a weak pertubation. The our results foresee that the ampli tude as well as the width of the pulse suffer a smaller effect of the fiber loss that thought, and approximate more of exact numerical solution by a factor of 2 in the exponent of the expo nentials [3,18,19]. In conclusion, the propagation of a pulse in a nonlinear loss medium has been analysed using a variational modified approach. This modified approac h describes in a more consistent way the behavior of pulse in a dissipative system. The our res ults are more accuracy when compared with a pertubative solution where Γ is treated as a w eak pertubation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS One of us (J.R.O) thanks the financial support by Conselho Nac ional de Desenvolvimento Cient´ ıfico e Tecnol´ ogico (CNPq), Brazil. 6REFERENCES [1] G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic, San Die go, 1989) [2] V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 61, 11 8(1971) [Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 62 (1972)]. [3] A. Hasegawa and F. Tappert, Appl. Phys. Lett. 23, 142 (197 3). [4] W. J. Firth, Opt. Commun. 22, 226 (1977). [5] D. Anderson, M. Bonnedal and M. Lisak, Phys. Fluids. 22, 1 838 (1979). [6] M. Karlsson, D. Anderson, M. Desaix and M. Lisak, Opt. Let t. 16, 1973 (1991). [7] D. Anderson, Phys. Rev. A27, 3135 (1983). [8] R. Y. Chiao, E. Garmire, and C. H. Yownes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 479 (1964). [9] C. E. Max, Phys. Fluids. 19, 74 (1976). [10] M. S. Sodha and V. K. Tripathi, Phys. Rev. A16, 201 (1977) . [11] J. T. Manassah, P. L. Baldeck and R. R. Alfano, Opt. Lett. 13, 1090 (1988). [12] J. T. Manassah, P. L. Baldeck and R. R. Alfano, Opt. Lett. 13, 589 (1988). [13] Z. Jovanoski and R. A. Sammut, Phys. Rev. E50, 4087 (1994 ). [14] J. R. Ray, Am. J. Phys. 47, 626 (1979). [15] L. Herrera, L. N´ u˜ nez, A. Pati˜ no and H. Rago, Am. J. Phy s. 54, 273 (1986). [16] D. S. Freitas, J. R. de Oliveira and M. A. de Moura, J. Phys . A: Math. Gen. 30 (1997). [17] H. Kogelnik, T. Li, Appl. Opt.5, 1550 (1966). [18] J. Satsuma and N. Yajiama, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 55, 284 (1974) [19] G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic, San Di ego, 1989)[see ch. 5.4] 7FIGURES -5,0-2,50,02,55,00,00,51,0 024|u(/c122,/c116)|2 /c120/c116 FIG. 1. Plot illustrate the pulse propagation for ξ= 0,2 and 4, taking Γ = 0 .035 8

arXiv:physics/0008012v1 [physics.hist-ph] 4 Aug 2000The interpretations by experimenters of experiments on ‘time dilation’: 1940 - 1970 circa Ilaria Bonizzoni and Giuseppe Giuliani Dipartimento di Fisica ‘Volta’, Via Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, It aly E - mail: ilaria@fisav.unipv.it E - mail: giuliani@fisav.unipv.it Web site - http: \\matsci.unipv.it \percorsi \ Tempus item per se non est, sed rebus ab ip- sis consequitur sensus, transactum quid sit in aevo, tum quae res instet, quid porro deinde sequatur; nec per se quenquam tem- pus sentire fatendumst semot ab rerum motu placidaque quiete.a Lucretius, De Rerum Natura , I, 459 - 463. aEven time does not exists of itself; but sense reads out of things what happened long ago, what presses now, and what shall follow after: no man, we must admit, feels time itself, disjoined from motion and quiet repose of things. Abstract . Experimental tests on ‘time dilation’ began in 1938 with Iv es and Stilwell’s work of the transverse Doppler effect due to at oms in inertial flight. Rossi and Hall (1941) inaugurated the era of fast movi ng elementary particles that dominated the scene until the discovery of th e M¨ ossbauer effect (1957). This discovery suggested the use of photons emitted without recoil in crystalline solids for testing both time dilation and gra vitational red shift. Finally, around 1970, Hafele and Keating dealt again with ti me dilation by sending macroscopic atomic clocks around the Earth. The int erpretations of these experiments by experimenters have been characterize d by the use of additional hypotheses not necessary for the formal development of the t heo- ries under test (the idea that all clocks measure proper time ) or hypotheses completely extraneous to the theories themselves (the idea that atoms areclocks). If these assumptions are dropped, it turns out that the only ex- periments concerning time dilation are those performed wit h elementary particles in inertial flight. The historical and epistemolo gical implications are discussed. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 A point of view 3 3 The origins 7 3.1 Moving clocks run slow and twins age differently . . . . . . . 8 3.2 Moving atoms as moving clocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.3 Clocks on a rotating disc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4 Doppler effect from a corpuscular point of view 14 5 The experiments and their interpretations by experimente rs 15 5.1 Atoms in inertial flight: a twist of fate . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 5.2 Particles in flight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.2.1 Particles in inertial flight in the atmosphere . . . . . 21 5.2.2 Particles in inertial flight in vacuum . . . . . . . . . . 23 5.3 Particles in circular orbits in vacuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.4 Photons emitted and absorbed by nuclei without recoil . . . 26 5.4.1 An effect due to the temperature . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.4.2 Nuclei in crystals on rotating systems . . . . . . . . . 31 5.5 Atomic clocks around the Earth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 6 Conclusions 38 7 Appendix 41 7.1 Atomic Cesium clocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 7.2 The M¨ ossbauer effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 7.3 The rotating disc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 7.4 The temperature effect of Pound and Rebka . . . . . . . . . 43 7.5 Atomic clocks around the Earth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 1 Introduction In this paper we shall deal with the interpretations of ‘time dilation’ ex- periments performed between 1940 and 1970 circa and explici tly grounded on special relativity. The interpretations taken into acco unt are onlythose 2given by experimenters themselves. This limitation is sugg ested by the fact that a wider choice, encompassing the whole literature and d ebate on the issue, not only goes beyond our capacities but would require a size typical of a book. The first part of the paper is dedicated to the exposition of a p oint of view (our own). Its main purpose is that of allowing an analytical discussion of the interpretations given by experimenters; as we shall see , this discussion will bring to the surface interesting historical features a nd will focus the epistemological aspects of the interpretations. In second place, the suggested point of view might be a possible guide for the reader in going through the matter. Technical information about specialized topics and length y calculations have been put in Appendix. 2 A point of view The suggested point of view is based, essentially, on three p oints: a) the relation between clocks and time; b) the rejection of the idea that atoms (or nuclei) can be cons idered as clocks; c) the necessary use of the corpuscular description of electromagnetic radiation when the radiation - matter interaction at the mic roscopic level is a basicfeature of the experiment. These three assumptions do not interfere with the formal development of either special or general relativity. Every item of the suggested point of view can probably be foun d in liter- ature; however, taken as a whole, it throws new light on the in terpretations of the experiments discussed. 1.Theories, measurements and their interpretation. The formal results of a physical theory are, in general, expressed by ma thematical formulas. In order to relate these formulas with experiment s, we must: (a) Understand which physical quantities should be measure d. In general, these physical quantities are suggested without a mbigu- ity by the theory itself. (b) Choose available instruments for measuring these physi cal quan- tities or make new ones. This step implies the use of theories different from the one under test: the theories of the instrum ents. 3(c) Evaluate if the results of the experiments are in accorda nce with the theory under test (the other theories used are considere d as acquired). In making this evaluation - besides the theory un der test and the theories of the instruments - we can use other the ories (or some their presuppositions) or other presuppositions: all of them considered as established. In this paper, the expression interpretation of the results of an exper- iment refers to the evaluation procedure of point cabove. 2.Time and clocks. The main feature of a physical quantity is that it can be measu red. Generally speaking, a measurement is based on a physical int erac- tion - involving energy transfer - between something whose p roperty is measured and the apparatus which measures this property: th e appa- ratus measures the property of something distinct from it. Of course, there are measurements - for instance the measurement of the length of a rod with a unit rod - in which there is no energy transfer be tween the measuring apparatus and the physical system whose prope rty is being measured. However, also in this case, it is true that th e instru- ment - the unit rod - measures a property of something distinc t from it. We usually say that ‘time is measured by clocks’ as we say, for in- stance, that ‘current is measured by ammeters’. The same syn tactic structure of these two propositions should not obscure a fun damental difference: ammeters measure the property of something distinct from them; clocks merely show their numbers or hands. In theoretical descriptions of pre - relativistic Physics, timeis a mathe- matical variable, taken as increasing (and positive), used for describing non - spatial variations of physical quantities or the varia tions of the spatial coordinates of a point. In pre - relativistic Physics clocks can be used for simulating the mathematical variable timewithout any problem. Problems of inter- pretation arose, as it is well known, with the birth of relati vity. 3.Time dilation. In relativistic Physics the variable “time” becomes a coordinate in the sense that “time” is formally treated as the fourth coordinate of a four - dimensional space. Lorentz’s transfo rmations read: x′=1/radicalBig 1−V2/c2(x−V t) (1) y′=y (2) 4z′=z (3) t′=1/radicalBig 1−V2/c2/parenleftbigg t−V c2x/parenrightbigg (4) if the K′reference frame is considered in motion with respect to K along the positive direction of the common x≡x′axis. The formal meaning of Lorentz’s transformations is obvious: consider ed an event, these equations give the primed coordinates assigned to thi s event in terms of the unprimed ones. However, their operational and o bserva- tional meaning is not so obvious. As a matter of fact, the diffic ulties connected with the interpretation of Lorentz’s transforma tions have generated many discussions since the appearance of special relativity. From equation (4) it follows that: ∆t=∆t′ /radicalBig 1−V2/c2(5) Equation (5) connects the durations of a phenomenon occurri ng at a pointPat rest in the frame K′as measured in the two reference frames. While the measurement of ∆ t′presents no problem, the procedure for the measurement of ∆ tmust be specified. Usually, it is specified as follows. Arrange along the xaxis a sufficient large number of clocks and synchronize them; if the phenomenon begins when Pmeets clock AandAreads tA; if the phenomenon ends when Pmeets clock Band Breads tB; then ∆ t=tB−tA. This procedure, though conceptually sound, cannot be applied in practice. Only two other possibi lities are left: a) Observer K′sends two (infinitesimally short) light signals towards Kin coincidence with the beginning and the end of the phe- nomenon: the separation of these two events is ∆ t′. Observer K will receive the two signals separated by ∆ t, given by: ∆t= ∆t′1 +V/c/radicalBig 1−V2/c2(6) where Vis positive if the two observers are moving away and negative if they are approaching. From the measurement of V and ∆ t, observer Kcan calculate ∆ t′. b) IfKis able to measure the length lcovered by point Pduring the duration of the phenomenon, then this duration will be gi ven by ∆t=l/V. 4.Proper time. Usually, it is assumed that ‘clocks measure proper time’ i.e. the quantity dτ=ds/cwhen the spatial distance between the two 5events is zero: dsis the interval between two points of space - time andcis the velocity of light. The discussion of the previous sect ion suggests that this assumption should be handled with care. I n general relativity, the assumption about clocks and proper time lea ds to the conclusion that gravitation influences all clocks in the sam e way. We suggest, instead, that we must look for clocks that are influe nced by gravitation as indicated by the well known equation: dτ=1 c√−g00dx0(7) where x0is the time coordinate. Atomic clocks do; and we know why (see section 7.3). If one keeps on maintaining that in genera l relativity ‘clocks measure proper time’ one is faced with the following questions. How clocks are sensitive to the metric? Why all clocks are sen sitive to the metric in the same way? Usually, we try to understand ho w an instrument (in this case a clock) measures something or it can be influenced by something: this methodological rule should not be violated. 5.Electromagnetic radiation. We must choose a description for elec- tromagnetic radiation. Since we shall discuss experiments in which the radiation - matter interaction at the microscopic level plays a ba- sic role, we shall adopt the corpuscular point of view. The re asons are: α) In experiments based on the M¨ ossbauer effect (section 7.2 o f the Appendix) the emission and the absorption of electromagnet ic ra- diation by nuclei are basic processes of the observed phenom enon. The emitted and the absorbed energy maydepend on the physical state of emitting or absorbing nucleus. Therefore, the corp uscular description outlined in section 4 must be used. β) In the case of electromagnetic radiation emitted by atoms i n iner- tial motion the source and its physical state can be ignored i n the theoretical description of the experiment because the meas ured quantity (the energy of the radiation) depends onlyon the rela- tive velocity between the emitter (the atom) and the absorbi ng apparatus (the spectrograph). Moreover, the spectrograph can be treated as a macroscopic object, since the ultimate level of exper- imental analysis is the shift of macroscopic spectral lines recorded on a photographic plate. The fact that these lines are the pro d- uct of many microscopic events is irrelevant since the obser ved results do not depend on microscopic parameters: the atoms o f the photographic plate can be changed without influencing th e 6experimental results. Therefore, in this case, electromag netic ra- diation couldbe treated as an undulatory phenomenon. However, one can also adopt a corpuscular point of view. We shall adopt the latter on the basis of the arguments developed in the foll owing point γ. γ) In our study, we shall deal with the idea that individual atoms (or nuclei) can be treated as clocks because they emit waves endo wed with a definite frequency. These assumptions find their roots in nineteenth century physics. In particular, the emission of periodic waves by matter was explained in terms of periodic motions of charged particles having the same frequency of the emitted w aves. However, firstly Bohr’s quantum condition has broken the lin k between internal motions and emitted frequencies; then qua ntum mechanics has rule out any possible link among them. All we know about atoms and nuclei suggests that they emit and absor b energy in discrete, directional processes. We do not know ho w long these processes are; we can only guess that their durati on should be less than the time taken by light to travel through a n atom or a nucleus ( ≈10−19sor≈10−24s, respectively). Then, it appears as meaningless to speak of emission of something l ike a wave with a period of say 10−15sin a time interval which is 104times shorter. Someone may object that the standard unit of time is now based on atomic clocks and, therefore, that atoms are, in some sense, clocks. However, in atomic clocks atoms behav e only as microscopic locking devices of the energy of the quan ta absorbed by atoms (see section 7.1 in the Appendix). One may disagree, partially or wholly, on this point. Howeve r, ev- eryone would probably acknowledge that fundamental conclu sions about time should not be drawn on the basis of a questionable andsuperfluous idea like that of atoms considered as clocks. 3 The origins The origins of the experiments on ‘time dilation’ are, of cou rse, Einstein’s writings on special and general relativity. These writings have been the sub- ject of many historical reconstructions.1The role of this section is merely 1The literature on Einstein’s works and on their interpretat ion is enormous. See, for instance the references contained in: A.I. Miller, Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity - Emergence (1905) and early interpretations (1 905 - 1911) (London, 1981); A. Pais, The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein , (Oxford, 1982). The database of theHistory of Science Society (http://weber.u.washington.edu/˜hssexec/index.html) is a useful tool for searching historical treatments of the subj ect. 7that of recalling relevant points for our discussion of the e xperiments per- formed after about 1940: in no way it should be considered a (s ketchy) historical reconstruction of Einstein’s ideas or and/or th e first development of relativity issues. The points are: i) the idea that the fundamental period of a clock in inertial motion increases ii) the ‘twin paradox’ iii) the idea of testing ‘time dilation’ by observing the rad iation emitted by moving atoms iv) the idea of testing ‘time dilation’ by comparing two cloc ks placed at different distances from the center of a rotating disc 3.1 Moving clocks run slow and twins age differently In Einstein’s 1905 paper we can find matter for both points i) a nd ii) above. In the paragraph entitled “The physical meaning of the equat ions obtained concerning moving rigid body and moving clocks”, Einstein w rites: This yields the following peculiar consequence: if at the po ints AandBofKthere are located clocks at rest which, observed in a system at rest, are synchronized, and if the clock in Ais transported to Balong the connecting line with velocity v, then, upon arrival of this clock at Bthe two clocks will no longer be synchronized; instead, the clock that has been transported from AtoBwill lag (1 /2)tv2/V2sec(up to quantities of the four and higher orders) behind the clock that has been in Bfrom the outset, if tis the time needed by the clock to travel from Ato B. We see at once that this result holds even when the clock moves fromAtoBalong any polygonal line, and even when the points AandBcoincide. If we assume that the result proved for a polygonal line holds also for a continuously curved line, then we arrive at the followi ng proposition: if there are two synchronous clocks in A, and one of them is moved along a closed curve with constant velocity unt il it has returned to A, which takes, say, t sec, then this clock will lag on its arrival at A(1/2)tv2/V2secbehind the clock that has not been moved. From this we conclude that a balance - wheel clock that is located at the Earth’s equator must be very slig htly 8slower than an absolutely identical clock, subjected to oth erwise identical conditions, that is located at one of the Earth’s p ole.2 In this passage we find both the hint that clocks might be slowed down by inertial motion and the core of what will become later the clo ck paradox (the twin paradox, when applied to living beings). As a matter of fact, none of the cases discussed by Einstein in this passage refers to inertial motion. However, the first one can be easil y transformed in an inertial motion case by introducing a third clock Cin inertial motion with respect to AandB, which are in relative rest and synchronized. Of course, Einstein’s conclusion about the reading of clock Awhen it meets B is based on the implicit assumption that clock Bmeasures tand clock A, when set in motion, measures t′. In a lecture addressed to an audience of naturalists in Janua ry, 16th, 1911, after having described the journey of a clock, Einstei n pointed out that: It should be added that whatever holds for this clock, which w e introduced as a simple representation of all physical pheno mena, holds for closed physical systems of any other constitution . Were we, for example, to place a living organism in a box and make it perform the same to - and - fro motion as the clock discussed above, it would be possible to have this organism return to it s original starting point after an arbitrarily long flight hav ing un- dergone an arbitrarily small change, while identically con stituted organisms that remained at rest at the point of origin have lo ng since given way to new generations. The long time spent on the trip represented only an instant for the moving organism if t he motion occurred with approximately the velocity of light! This is an inevitable consequence of our fundamental principles, i mposed on us by experience .3 And, in a response to a question: The clock runs slower if it is in uniform motion, but if it under- goes a change in direction as a result of a jolt, then the theor y of relativity does not tell us what happens. The sudden chang e of direction might produce a sudden change in the position of the hands of the clock. However, the longer the clock is movin g 2A. Einstein, ‘On the electrodynamics of moving bodies’, in A .J. Kox, Martin J. Klein and R. Schulmann (eds), The collected papers of Albert Einstein , vol. 2, The Swiss years: writings, 1900 - 1909, English translation, (Princeton, 19 89), 140 - 171, on 153. 3A. Einstein, ‘The theory of relativity’ in A.J. Kox, Martin J . Klein and R. Schulmann (eds), The collected papers of Albert Einstein , vol. 3, The Swiss years: writings, 1909 - 1911, English translation, (Princeton, 1989), 340 - 358, on 348 - 349; italics added. 9rectilinearly and uniformly with a given speed of forward mo tion, i.e., the larger the dimensions of the polygon, the smaller m ust be the effect of such a hypothetical sudden change.4 Einstein speaks of clocks running slow in uniform motion, po ints out that “the theory does not tells us what happens” in the presence of acceleration, but stresses that its hypothetical effect may be reduced by in creasing the duration of the uniform journey of the clock. Of course, in Einstein’s writings of those days we can find als o descrip- tions of ‘time dilation’ that can be considered as ‘operatio nal’. Here are two examples: •As I showed in an earlier paper, it follows from these princip les that a uniformly moving clock runs at a slower rate as judged from a “sta- tionary” system than as judged by a co - moving observer .5 •Thus, observed from the system S[the ‘stationary’ one], the clock completes ν=ν0/radicalBig 1−v2/c2periods per unit time; or: the rate of a clock moving uniformly with velocity vrelative to a reference system is slower in the ratio 1 :/radicalBig 1−v2/c2, as observed from this system, than that of the same clock when at rest relative to that system .6 Miller has accounted for the first debates on these issues in c hapter seven of his book.7 3.2 Moving atoms as moving clocks In a 1907 paper, Einstein proposed to test ‘time dilation’ us ing moving atoms as light sources: In an important paper published last year, Mr. J. Stark (J. St ark, Ann. d. Phys. 21 (1906), 401.) demonstrated that the moving positive ions of canal rays emit line spectra by identifying the Doppler effect and following it quantitatively. He also unde rtook experiments with the intention of detecting and measuring a n effect of the second order (proportional to ( v/V)2); however, the 4Ibid., 354; italics added. 5A. Einstein, ‘On the possibility of a new test of the relativi ty principle’ in A.J. Kox, Martin J. Klein and R. Schulmann (eds), The collected papers of Albert Einstein , vol. 2, The Swiss years: writings, 1900 - 1909, English translation , (Princeton, 1989), 232 - 233, on 232; italics added. 6A. Einstein, ‘On the relativity principle and the conclusio ns drawn from it’ in A.J. Kox, Martin J. Klein and R. Schulmann (eds), The collected papers of Albert Einstein , vol. 2, The Swiss years: writings, 1900 - 1909, English trans lation, (Princeton, 1989), 252 - 311, on 262; italics added. 7Note 1, on 221 - 274. 10experimental arrangement, which was not set up specifically for this purpose, was not adequate for achieving reliable resul ts. I will show here briefly that the principle of relativity in co njunc- tion with the principle of the constancy of the velocity of li ght makes it possible to predict the above effect. As I showed in an earlier paper, it follows from these principles that a unifo rmly moving clock runs at a slower rate as judged from a “stationar y” system than as judged by a co - moving observer. If νdenotes the number of the clock’s strokes per unit time for the observ er at rest, and ν0the corresponding number for the co - moving observer, then ν ν0=/radicalBigg 1−/bracketleftbiggv V/bracketrightbigg2 (8) or to first approximation ν−ν0 ν0=−1 2/bracketleftbiggv V/bracketrightbigg2 (9) The atom ion of the canal rays that emits and absorbs radiatio n of certain frequencies is thus to be conceived as a fast - movi ng clock, and the relation just indicated can therefore be appl ied to it.8 Einstein specified his idea of the atom as a clock in a paper alr eady quoted: Since the oscillations process that corresponds to a spectr al line is to be considered as an intra - atomic process whose frequen cy is determined by the ion alone, we may consider such an ion as a clock of a certain frequency ν0, which can be determined, for example, by investigating the light emitted by identica lly constituted ions which are at rest relative to the observer. The above consideration shows, then, that the effect of motion on the light frequency that is to be ascertained by the observer is not completely given by the Doppler effect. The motion also reduces the (apparent) proper frequency of the emitting ion s in accordance with the relation given above.9 Notice that the idea of the atom as a clock is associated with ‘ intra - atomic oscillations’ whose frequency is the same as that of the spec tral line observed. This associaton has characterized the description of elect romagnetic emission by matter since the late years of nineteenth century. 8Note 5 on 232. 9Note 6 on 263. 113.3 Clocks on a rotating disc In the paper on general relativity, Einstein used, among oth ers, the following argument for illustrating the necessity of general covaria nce of natural laws (Kis an inertial frame, K′a frame rotating with constant angular velocity with respect to K): ...let us consider two identical clocks, one at the origin an d the other on the circumference [of the K′frame]; both of them are observed from the “stationary” system K. As a consequence of a well known result from special relativity theory, the cl ock on the circumference, observed from K, goes slower than the other, because the former is in motion and the latter is at res t. An observer in the origin, capable of observing the clock on t he circumference through light signals, will find it slower tha n the one at the origin. Since this observer cannot think that ligh t speed depends explicitly on time along the path considered, he will interpret his observations by concluding that the cloc k on the circumference “really” goes slower than the clock at the ori gin. Therefore, he will have to define time in such a way that the angular velocity of a clock hands depends on the position of t he clock.10 This is the first appearance of the idea of comparing, at least in a ‘gedanken experiment’, the readings of two clocks placed on a rotating disc at different distances from its center. In the above passage, Einstein se ems to consider the slowing down of the clock on the circumference predicted by special rela- tivity as apparent, because due to its motion with respect to the ‘stationary’ system (the laboratory); in contrast with its “real” slowin g down claimed by the rotating reference frame, who sees the clock on the cir cumference at rest. Some years later, in an appendix to his volume on special and g eneral relativity, this idea was further developed. Einstein cons idered two identical clocks on a rotating disc, one at the center and the other at a d istance rfrom it. The rotating reference frame is named K′and the inertial (laboratory) frame K: A clock, at a distance rfrom the center of the disc, has a velocity with respect to Kgiven by v=ωr (10) where ωis the angular velocity of the disc K′with respect to K. Ifν0is the number of ticks of the clock per unit time (rate 10A. Einstein, ‘Die Grundlagen der Allgemeinen Relativit¨ at stheorie’, Annalen der Physik 49 (1916), 769 - 822 on 775. 12of the clock) with respect to Kwhen the clock is at rest, then the rate of the clock ( ν) when it moves with respect to Kwith velocity v, but at rest with respect to the disc, will be given by, in agreement with paragraph ..., the relation ν=ν0/radicalBig 1−v2/c2 (11) or, with a good approximation by ν=ν0/parenleftBigg 1−1 2v2 c2/parenrightBigg (12) This expression may be written in the form ν=ν0/parenleftBigg 1−1 c2ω2r2 2/parenrightBigg (13) If we denote by ϕthe potential difference of the centrifugal force between the position of the clock and the center of the disc, i.e. the work, taken as negative, that must be done against the centrifugal force on a unit mass for transporting it from the position of the clock on the rotating disc to the center of the disc, then we shall have: ϕ=−ω2r2 2(14) ν=ν0/parenleftbigg 1 +ϕ c2/parenrightbigg (15) Therefore From this relation we see at first that two identica l clocks will have different rates when at different distances f rom the center of the disc. This result is correct also from the po int of view of an observer rotating with the disc. Since, from the po int of view of the disc, a gravitational field of potential ϕappears, the result we have obtained will be valid in general for gravitat ional fields. Furthermore, we can consider an atom emitting spectr al lines as a clock; therefore the following statement will hol d:the frequency of the light absorbed or emitted by an atom depends on the gravitational field in which the atom find itself .11 The distinction between ‘apparent’ and ‘real’ has gone. Ein stein merely states that the same expression for the frequency shift can b e obtained by special relativity (point of view of the stationary observe r) or by general relativity (point of view of the rotating observer). In sect ion 7.3 of the Appendix a more general case is treated: it will be useful in t he discussion of the realization of the thought experiment devised by Eins tein. 11A. Einstein, (1921) ¨Uber die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativit¨ atstheori e (gemein- verst¨ andlich) , (Braunschweig, 1921) on 88 - 89. 134 Doppler effect from a corpuscular point of view The experiment with atoms in inertial flight, devised by Eins tein in 1907, received an elegant and rigorous theoretical treatment by S chr¨ odinger in 1922.12Schr¨ odinger considered an atom in motion with respect to th e mea- suring apparatus and treated the radiation emitted by the at om as light quanta with energy hνand linear momentum hν/c. Starting from the rela- tivistic equations for energy and momentum conservation, S chr¨ odinger got the relation: ν=ν∗ 1/radicalBig γ1[1−(v1/c) cosθ1]×γ2[1−(v2/c) cosθ2](16) νis the frequency measured by the spectrograph; v1, v2, θ1, θ2are, respec- tively, the velocities of the emitting atom and the angles th at these velocities form with the direction of observation of the emitted photon before (suffix 1) and after (suffix 2) the emission; all the quantities are mea sured in the reference frame of the apparatus. The quantity ν∗is given by: ν∗=E2 1−E2 2 2h√E1E2(17) where E1, E2are the rest energy of the atom before and after the emission. ν∗is, therefore, relativistically invariant. Strangely eno ugh, Schr¨ odinger did stop at equation (16). As a matter of fact, few further passag es lead to the equation: ν=ν0/radicalBig 1−v2 1/c2 1−(v1/c) cosθ1(18) where: ν0=∆E h/parenleftbigg 1−∆E 2E1/parenrightbigg (19) with ∆ E=E1−E2. Equation (18) has the same form of the standard equation for the Doppler effect but the treatment based on lig ht quanta predicts also, through equation (19), the energy loss of the photon due to the atom recoil. The quantity ν0has a precise operational meaning: it is the frequency measured when the emitting atom or nucleus is a t rest (with respect to the measuring apparatus) before the emission. Sc hr¨ odinger rela- tivistic treatment of the system atom+photon preceded that of Compton13 12E. Schr¨ odinger, ‘Dopplerprinzip und Bohrsche Frequenzbe dingung’, Physikalische Zeitschrift 23 (1922), 301 - 303. A more detailed discussion of this work w ill be given in a paper in progress. 13A.H. Compton, ‘A quantum theory of the scattering of X - rays b y light elements’, Physical Review 21 (1923), 483 - 502. 14and Debey14applied to the system photon+electron . Compton and Debye do not quote Schr¨ odinger’s paper. It seems that Schr¨ odinger ’s paper has been largely overlooked also in the following years. In a paper by Enrico Fermi published in 1932, the Doppler effect is handled within a gene ral treatment of the quantum theory of radiation. Before treating the argu ment within this approach in a nonrelativistic approximation, Fermi ma kes a calculation similar to that used by Schr¨ odinger at the beginning of his p aper; but he does not quote Schr¨ odinger.15 In spite of the fact that equation (19) is widely used today, t he entire treatment given by Schr¨ odinger has been forgotten by physi cists. To our knowledge, it has never been applied in research papers; we h ave found it only in textbooks. In his book on relativity, Møller prese nts a com- plete treatment of the shift of spectral lines emitted by ato ms in motion in terms of light quanta, including gravitation effects; but he does not quote Schr¨ odinger’s paper.16According to Møller the quantity ν0of equation (19) must be multiplied by a factor/radicalBig 1 + 2χ/c2if the atom is in a point of grav- itational potential χand the gravitational field is negligible at the position of the spectrograph. Also French in his book on special relat ivity discusses the Doppler effect in terms of light quanta: he too, however, d oes not quote Schr¨ odinger.17 Schr¨ odinger’s treatment can be easily applied also to the c ase of a photon absorbed by an atom in flight with respect to the laboratory re ference frame. The frequency associated with the photon absorbed by the ato m is again given by equation (18), where, in this case: ν0=∆E h/parenleftbigg 1 +∆E 2E1/parenrightbigg (20) is the frequency associated with the photon absorbed by an at om at rest, in the laboratory frame, before the absorption and, of cours e, now ∆ E= E2−E1. 5 The experiments and their interpretations by experimenters 14P. Debye, ‘Zerstreung von R¨ ontgenstahlen und Quantentheo rie’,Physikalische Zeitschrift 24 (1923), 161 - 166. 15E. Fermi, ‘Quantum Theory of Radiation’, Reviews of Modern Physics 4 (1932), 87 - 132 on 105 - 106. 16C. Møller, The theory of relativity , Second Edition, (Oxford, 1972) on 401 - 407. 17A.P. French, Special Relativity , (London, 1968) on 197 - 199. 155.1 Atoms in inertial flight: a twist of fate In late thirties Ives and Stilwell set up an apparatus for the realization of the experiment devised by Einstein in 1907 (section 3.2).18The experiment was fully financed by the Bell Telephone Laboratories where I ves was then working.19It was a twist of fate that a test of relativity suggested by it s founder has been taken up, performed and interpreted by an an ti - relativist. Ives was a staunch opponent of relativity: he held a view char acterized by the assumption that the fundamental period of clocks and the len gth of rods in motion with respect to the ether really increases and decreases, respectively. (Here, really means that “the clock or the rod undergoes some physical changes”). Ives presented his point of view in a series of pap ers written through about fifteen years: they have been collected in a vol ume.20Ives and Stilwell write: In previous papers in this series, various consequences of t he al- teration of the rate of a clock in motion, which is an essentia l el- ement in the theory of Larmor and Lorentz, have been discusse d. In these papers, this change in clock rate has of necessity be en treated as an assumption, since, up to the present time it has not been the subject of independent experimental verificati on. As was pointed out in these papers, the Michelson - Morley and Kennedy - Thorndyke experiments do not give the necessary in - formation to establish the existence of this change of rate. An experimental search for this phenomenon is of particular in ter- est, because the alteration of clock rate should be manifest ed as apositive effect, instead of the nulleffect characteristic of all 18H.E. Ives and G.R. Stilwell, (1938) ‘An Experimental Study o f the Rate of a Moving Atomic Clock’, Journal of the Optical Society of America 28 (1938), 215 - 226. 19R. Hazalett and D. Turner,(eds) Einstein Myth and Ives Papers - A Counterrevolu- tion in Physics , (Old Greenwich, 1979) on 40. 20Note 19. Ives’ theory is a very complicated one. It is based on two basic assumptions: a) the existence of the ether; b) the relativity principle (P oincar´ e’s, according to Ives). Assumption a) forces to consider the possibility that there are three light speeds (the same for all inertial observers, according to b)): one way ou t, one way back and two ways (out - back). Therefore, the settings of clocks at rest in an a rbitrarily chosen inertial reference frame Icannot be performed by light signals: it is necessary to use a clock moving at a speed qfrom one clock to another. The speed qis given by d/∆t, where dis the distance covered by the clock and ∆ tthe time interval read by the moving clock itself. (As a matter of fact, Ives does not denote the quantity qas a ‘velocity’, but as a ‘rod - to - clock quotient’: the term ‘velocity’ is reserved to ‘rod - to - clock quotients’ when rods and clocks are at rest with respect to the ether). From a) and b), Ives derives: i) the ‘clock retardation’ and ‘length contraction’; ii) coordin ates transformations much more complicated than Lorentz’s. Ives’ transformations are app roximated by Lorentz’s when q∼=0, but never coincide with Lorentz’s: qcannot be zero, because without a moving clock there cannot be any settings of clocks at rest in an arbi trarily chosen inertial frame and, therefore, measurements. 16other optical experiments. The first suggestion as to a means by which this positive effect might be observed experimentally came from Einstein and fro m Ritz over thirty years ago, namely that the newly discovered Doppler effect in canal rays involved velocities of the movin g particles high enough to show the expected effect. The experi - ment, whose crucial nature has been repeatedly emphasized, has been commonly imagined as performed by observing the canal rays at right angles to their direction of motion, and for tha t reason, has been referred to as “the transverse Doppler effec t.”21 After this introduction, Ives and Stilwell stress that ...it would be extremely difficult to be sure that observation was made exactly at right angles to the direction of the rays, and very small deviations from this direction would introduce shift s of the order of magnitude of the expected effect.22 However, this difficulty ...can be avoided by observing not at right angles, but in two directions, with and against the motion of the particles; th e ob- servation being made simultaneously by the use of a mirror in the tube. Under these conditions the displaced Doppler line s are observed corresponding to motion toward and away from the ob - server, and the effect to be observed is a shift of the center of gravity of the displaced lines with respect to the undisplac ed line. As shown in an earlier paper of this series this shift of cente r of gravity is expressed by the equation λ=λ0(1−V2/c2)1/2where Vis the observed or measured velocity of the positive particl es.23 The emitting atoms where hydrogen atoms produced by acceler ating H+ 2 orH+ 3molecular ions against stationary (on average) H2molecules. The observed line was the Hβline. For describing the experimental procedure, we shall use its clear descrip- tion outlined by Mandelberg and Witten, who remade Ives and S tilwell’s measurement in the sixties.24 1. One measures the wavelength λBof the light emitted by the incoming atoms at a small angle θto the beam direction: λB=λ01−Bcosθ (1−B2)1/2≈λ0/parenleftbigg 1−Bcosθ+1 2B2/parenrightbigg (21) 21Note 18 on 215. 22Ibid. 23Ibid. 216. 24H.I. Mandelberg, and L. Witten, ‘Experimental Verification of the Relativistic Doppler Effect’ Journal of the Optical Society of America 52 (1962), 529 - 536. 17where λ0is the natural wavelength, B=v/c≪1 and vis the velocity of the atoms. 2. One measures the wavelength λRof the light emitted by the receding atoms at the angle ( π−θ) to the beam direction: λR=λ01 +Bcosθ (1−B2)1/2≈λ0/parenleftbigg 1 +Bcosθ+1 2B2/parenrightbigg (22) 3. The average of the two wavelengths is: λQ=1 2(λB+λR) =λ0/parenleftbigg 1 +1 2B2/parenrightbigg (23) and equals the wavelength which would be observed at right an gles to the beam. 4. The difference between the two wavelengths is: 2λD=λR−λB= 2λ0Bcosθ (24) where λDrepresents the first order Doppler effect. Ives and Stilwell: a)derived the experimental value of the atoms velocity vfrom (24) b)predicted the value of the transverse Doppler shift by using this value of the atoms velocity c)compared the calculated value of the transverse Doppler shi ft with that measured according to (23) d)concluded by stating that the theoretical predictions agre e with experi- mental results within measurements precision As a matter of fact, Ives and Stilwell used also an a’) step (in stead of a)) in which the velocity of the emitting atom was assumed to be the v elocity of the incoming H+ 2orH+ 3ion calculated through the relation eV= (1/2)Mv2, where eis the charge of the ion, Mits mass, vits velocity and Vthe acceler- ating potential. Ives and Stilwell found that both procedur es for calculating the velocity of the emitting atoms resulted in a predicted tr ansverse Doppler shift (point b) above) in agreement with the measured one (po int c) above). Of course, in the conclusions, Ives and Stilwell interpret t he experimental results as a confirmation of Lorentz’s view: 18This experiment forms the necessary optical complement to t he Michelson - Morley experiment, and the more general form of this experiment due to Kennedy and Thorndyke. The null resul t of the latter experiment can be explained, on the assumption of a fixed luminiferous ether , by contractions of the apparatus along and across the direction of motion which are in a definit e ratio to each other, namely (1 −V2/c2)1/2: 1 where Vis the velocity of the apparatus and cthe velocity of light. From these experiments the contractions are unfixed in absolute amount ; i.e., the contractions in the two directions could be 1 −V2/c2 and (1 −V2/c2)1/2, etc. For each absolute contraction, there is demanded in general a change in the rate of the clock at the ori gin of the light signals, and an independent experiment must fur nish this rate in order to completely solve the problem. The prese nt experiment establishes this rate as according to the relati on ν=ν0(1−V2/c2)1/2(25) where ν0is the frequency of the clock when stationary in the ether, νits frequency when in motion. It follows then on com- bining this result with the results of the Kennedy - Thorndyk e experiment that the dimensions of the moving apparatus are c on- tracted by the factor (1 −V2/c2)1/2in the direction of motion, and are unaffected at right angles to that direction. The Michelson - Morley experiment and Kennedy - Thorndyke experiments, yielding null results, could, of themselves, be equally well explained – and more simply – by assuming an ether en- trained by the earth, or a ballistic character of light emiss ion, instead of assuming two concealed conspiring compensation s - contractions of dimensions and of clock rates. The present e x- periment, giving a positive instead of a null result, may hen ce be claimed to give more decisive evidence for the Larmor - Loren tz theory than is given by the experiments which have yielded nu ll results. The discussion of the consequences of this change in clock ra te, the reality of which may be taken as established by this exper - iment, consists practically of the entire theory of the optics of moving bodies as developed by Larmor and Lorentz.25 Ives’ standpoint, held about thirty years later Einstein’s 1905 paper, may appear as a survivor. Ives was, obviously, conscious of that . Notwithstand- ing, as shown by the following recollection, Ives sustained his point of view with a spirit of defiance. On October 24, 1950, Ives wrote to H. Butterfield: 25Ibid. 226; italics added. 19What would really be exciting would be if the [American] Phil o- sophical Society should succeed in their effort over the year s to get Einstein to come to Philadelphia and sign the Society’s r oll book. Giving this paper [“Revisions of the Lorentz Transfor ma- tions”] with him in the front row would be something! I faced that situation once before, in 1938, when I was asked to prese nt the atomic clock work before the Princeton Physics group. I gave the background entirely in terms of FitzGerald, Lorent z and Larmor (I was then ignorant of Poincar´ e). It was certain ly not diplomatic, and the Princeton lads won’t recognize me on the street to this day. When I was in Europe in the summer of ’38, I found they had written to their friends that my work didn’t amount to anything (Pauli told me this).26 Ives’ interpretation is worth discussing a little more. Giv en his fundamental assumptions, one may wonder why the formulas used by Ives con tain the velocity of the emitting atoms with respect to the spectrogr aph instead of the velocities of the emitting atoms andof the spectrograph with respect to the ether. In a previous paper, Ives has shown that - also in hi s theory - the Doppler effect depends only on the relative velocity between the source and the spectrograph.27 A year later, R.C. Jones interpreted Ives and Stilwell resul ts in a special relativity approach, assuming, of course, that atoms can be treated as clocks. Jones did not attack Ives’ standpoint; he wrote instead: The conceptual background of these theories [Larmor’s and L orentz’s] is not the one which is most popular with physicists today, ho w- ever, and for this reason it seemed worth while to obtain the theoretical predictions from the point of view of the specia l the- ory of relativity, particularly since the relativistic poi nt of view yields the results in so simple a manner. The theoretical pre dic- tions we shall obtain here are identical with those obtained by Ives from electron theory.28 Jones pointed out that Ives and Stilwell did not measure the ‘ undisplaced’ Hβline: this should have been done, since the supposed ‘statio nary’ H2 molecules may, in effect, not be ‘stationary’, thus introduc ing systematic errors in the measurement. Ives and Stilwell acknowledged t he soundness of the criticism and in a subsequent paper showed that the effect predicted by 26Note 19 on 90. 27H.E. Ives,‘The Doppler Effect Considered in Relation to the M ichelson - Morley ex- periment’, Journal of the Optical Society of America 27 (1937), 389 - 392. 28R. Clark Jones, ‘On the Relativistic Doppler Effect’, Journal of the Optical Society of America 29, (1939) 337 - 339 on 337. 20Jones is, in some cases, present; however, it does not invali date the results obtained previously.29 Some years later, a similar experiment with canal rays was ca rried out by Gerhard Otting.30The contrast with Ives and Stilwell’s paper could have not been more striking. Otting does not comment either the fo rmulas or their interpretation: he is interested only in the correspo ndence between formulas and experimental data. As said above, the experiment was repeated again in the sixti es by Man- delberg and Witten. The basic experimental setup was the sam e as that of the older experiments: only the precision was improved. The two authors do not seem to be concerned directly with time dilation, but w ith a nonnull experiment regarding special relativity. After having rec alled mass variation experiments, they write: Another nonnull result of the theory [special relativity] w hich can be measured is the frequency or Doppler shift of spectral lin es and its dependence on the square of the velocity (on β2=v2/c2) together with the associated time - dilation prediction.31 Their explicit reference to the “associated time - dilation ” indicates that they adopt the standard hypothesis that atoms can be conside red as clocks. The experiments with atoms in inertial flight have been conce ived as tests of time dilation and interpreted as a corroboration of special relativity (Jones, Otting, Maldelberg and Witten) or of Lorentz’s ethe r theory (Ives and Stilwell). All these interpretations are based on the as sumption that atoms emit light in form of periodic waves and can be consider ed as clocks. In section 2, point 5 - γ, we have seen how this assumption appears unten- able on the basis of the knowledge acquired before the end of t he twenties. If we drop this assumption and adopt, instead, Schr¨ odinger ’s corpuscular treatment discussed in section 4, these experiments must be considered as a corroboration of relativistic dynamics and, only indirect ly, of Lorentz trans- formations: clocks, and their behaviour, are out of the pict ure. 5.2 Particles in flight 5.2.1 Particles in inertial flight in the atmosphere About 1940, Bruno Rossi and David Hall dealt with the decay of cosmic - rays mesotrons. The measurements were taken at Denver (Colo rado) and at Echo Lake, about thirty miles west of Denver: the differenc e in altitude 29H.E. Ives, , G.R. Stilwell, (1938) ‘An Experimental Study of the Rate of a Moving Atomic Clock. II’, Journal of the Optical Society of America 31 (1941), 369 - 374. 30G. Otting, ‘Der quadratische Dopplereffekt’, Physikalische Zeitschrift 40 (1939), 681 - 687. 31Note 24 on 529. 21was 1624 m(the geomagnetic latitude was practicality the same for bot h locations). The problem was that: Recent experiments on the variation of cosmic - rays intensi ty with altitude have shown that the rate of decrease of the meso tron component with increasing atmosphere depth cannot be accou nted for completely by ordinary ionization losses. [...] The anomalous absorption in air is interpreted on the hypoth esis that mesotrons disintegrate spontaneously with a proper li fetime of the order of a few microseconds. According to this assumpt ion, a considerable fraction of the mesotrons beam will disappea r by disintegration while traveling in the atmosphere. [...] A simple relativistic consideration shows that if the absor ption anomaly of mesotrons is due to the spontaneous decay it must b e more pronounced for mesotrons of high energy. In fact, let τ0be the “proper lifetime” of mesotrons; i.e. the lifetime measu red in a frame of reference in which the mesotron is at rest, and τthe lifetime measured in a frame of reference in which the mesotr on is moving with a velocity β. Then τ=τ0 (1−β2)1/2(26) and the “average range before decay” L, i.e. the average distance traveled by the mesotrons before disintegrating, becomes L=βτ=pτ0 µ(27) where µis the mass and p=µβ/(1−β2)1/2is the momentum of the mesotrons. [...] The experiments described in the present paper were primar- ily designed to test the dependence of disintegration proba bility on momentum expressed by equation (27). The purpose was to provide an additional check of the disintegration hypothes is and simultaneously to verify the relativistic formula for time inter- vals.32 In the discussion of the experimental results, Rossi and Hal l write: 32B. Rossi and D.B. Hall, ‘Variation of the Rate of Decay of Meso tron with Momentum’, Physical Review 59 (1941), 223 - 228 on 223 - 224. 22Thus, while a quantitative proof of equation (26) is still wa nting, its approximate validity may be considered as established.33 No comments are expressed on time dilation issues and no Eins tein’s paper is quoted. Rossi and Hall simply speak of ‘relativistic cons ideration’ or of ‘the theoretical predictions based on the relativity chang e in rate of a moving clock’. However, one can read in the abstract : The softer group of mesotrons was found to disintegrate at a rate about three time faster than the more penetrating group , in agreement with the theoretical predictions based on the relativity change in rate of a moving clock .34 This passage suggests that the authors share the idea that th e fundamental period of clocks in motion increases. The phenomenon studied by Rossi and Hall is complicated by th e fact that the momentum of mesotrons may be reduced by collisions w ith the molecules of the atmosphere: these collisions are taken int o account by the use of a relativistic formula given by Bethe and Bloch. Therefore, Rossi and Hall results must be considered in accordance with speci al relativity and, therefore, also with Lorentz’s transformations: howe ver, they cannot be considered as a direct confirmation of these transformati ons.35 5.2.2 Particles in inertial flight in vacuum Since the fifties, many papers have been published on the life time of high speed particles in inertial motion produced by accelerator s. Their focus was not on the relativistic behaviour of the particles: it was co nsidered as an acquired result to be used in describing the experimental da ta or as a by - product of the experiments. No comments on time dilation iss ues can be found in these works. As an example, let us quote from the pape r by Ayres et al., who write in their conclusions: The expected time dilation of the observed lifetime agrees w ith the predicted values to 0 .4% and provides the most precise veri- fication of this aspect of special relativity.36 These works have verified equation (26) to various degree of p recision in accelerators where the particles were flying in vacuum: the c omplications 33Ibid. 227. 34Ibid. 223; italics added. 35Miller (Note 1 on 266) has already stressed this point. Mille r holds that Ives and Stilwell experiment “is the only positive proof for Einstei n’s prediction of time dilation” (ibid.). Above, we have explained why we disagree. 36D.S. Ayres, et al. ‘Measurements of the Lifetime of Positive and negative Pions’, Physical Review D 3 (1971), 1051 - 1063 on 1062. 23introduced by the atmosphere in Rossi and Hall’s experiment were absent. Experimental results of this type are compared in the paper o f Bailey et al.37 As in the case of Rossi and Hall’s experiment, the lifetime τof flying particles is calculated as the quotient between the measured average distance λcovered by the particles before disintegrating and their measured velocity v. It turns out that the lifetime of flying particles measured a sτ=λ/vin the laboratory is related to their known lifetime at rest τL0in the laboratory frame by the formula τ=λ v=τL0/radicalBig 1−v2/c2(28) If we take for granted that the lifetime τF0of a particle flying in inertial motion is, in its reference frame, the same as that of a partic le at rest in the laboratory frame - as required by the principle of relativit y - then, we can replace τL0withτF0in equation (28): τ=λ v=τF0/radicalBig 1−v2/c2(29) The experimental procedure leading to equation (29) is exac tly the procedure outlined in point 3b of section 2. It is worth stressing that measurements made on muons at rest in the lab- oratory by an observer flying with velocity v, with respect to the laboratory, should yield the same results in accordance with the perfect equivalence of two inertial observers. Of course, this consideration rule out the possibility that the lifetime of muons in flight is increased, i.e. that th e fundamental period of clocks in motion is increased. 5.3 Particles in circular orbits in vacuum Bailey et al. studied the lifetime of both positive and negat ive muons in circular orbits.38Muons have a lifetime (at rest) of about 2 .2µsand decay into electrons, neutrinos ( ν) and antineutrinos ( ν): µ−→e−+νµ+νe (30) Their disintegration is observed through the detection of t he produced elec- trons. Previous similar measurements have been performed s ome years be- fore.39However, the new measurements have been carried out with mor e speedy particles and explicitly devised for testing time di lation. The muons 37J. Bailey, et al. ‘Measurements of Relativistic Time dilati on for Positive and Negative Muons in a Circular Orbit’, Nature 268 (1977), 301 - 305 on 304. 38Note 37. 39J. Bailey, et al. ‘Precise Measurement of the Anomalous Magn etic Moment of the Muon’, Il Nuovo Cimento 9A (1972), 369 - 432. 24were circulating in a uniform magnetic field on orbits with a d iameter of 14m. The authors write in the abstract: The value for positive muons is in accordance with special re lativ- ity and the measured lifetime at rest: the Einstein time dila tion factor agrees with experiments with a fractional error of 2 ×10−3 at 95% confidence. Assuming special relativity, the mean pro per lifetime for µ−is found to be τ0= 2,1948(10) µs (31) the most accurate value reported to date.40 The article begins with: Measurement of the lifetime of a sample of radioactive mater ial which is moving with a known velocity is a means of testing the so - called time dilation, or slowing down of moving clocks , predicted by the special theory of relativity. If, in additi on the radioactive particles move in closed circular orbits then t he con- ditions simulate those of the outward and return journey of t he twin paradox in which, according to the theory, the journeying twin ages more slowly then the one who stays at home . In this situation it is also possible to search for any modification o f the predictions of the theory due to acceleration.41 The lifetime, measured as λ/v, was of about 64 µs. The authors’ comments: Theµ+measurement differs in one important respect from the other results quoted in table...The π±,K±andK0 Smeasure- ments in flight were performed in beams for which the decaying particle, regarded as a clock , was in an inertial (unaccelerated) frame. In the muon experiment, however, the particles are su b- jected to a constant transverse acceleration of 1021cm s−2. The muons perform a round trip and so when compared with a muon at rest in the laboratory, simulate closely the so - called tw in paradox which was already discussed in Einstein’s first pape r. Other experiments42have confirmed the correctness of relativis- tic time dilation for clocks in circular motion to ∼10% at low velocities (a similar conclusion follows from the observat ions of second - order (transverse) Doppler effect, in the temperatu re 40Note 37 on 301. 41Ibid.; italics added. 42Note 52 and 63. 25dependence of the M¨ ossbauer effect43and of the hydrogen maser frequency). The present experiment is unique in its use of an ultra - relativistic clock ( γ≫1) and its much greater precision ∼0.1%. The possibility also exists that very large acceleratio ns may modify in some way the internal constitution of particle s. No such effects, in so far as they affect the particle lifetime, are seen in this experiment where the transverse accelerati on is ∼1018g.44 The experiment shows that λ/vandτF0are related as in the case of muons in inertial flight: the acceleration does not affect the lifet ime of the flying muons. This result is of basic relevance, as stressed by the a uthors. It implies that the motion of the flying muons can be considered a s if it were an inertial one. The authors do not state explicitly that their experimental results cor- roborate the hypothesis that ‘the journeying twin ages more slowly than the one who stays at home’; but they leave the reader with the impr ession that it is so. However, the authors do not conform, in their discus sion, to the basic conditions of the clock paradox. These conditions are : CP1 a fraction of the journey of the flying clock must be an iner tial motion CP2 at the end of the journey of the flying clock, the two clocks must be compared, one faced the other, in the same reference frame. Condition CP1 is satisfied by the experiment under discussio n. In fact, though the motion of the flying clock was circular, the experi ment shows that, as far as ‘time dilation’ is concerned, it can be consid ered as ‘inertial’. Condition CP2 was, of course, out of experimental reach: the experiment corroborates equation (29) and the authors simply commente d this corrob- oration. As already discussed above, this equation relates the lifetime of the flying muon τF0in its reference frame, assumed to be equal to the lifetime τL0of a muon at rest in the laboratory frame, with the lifetime τof the flying muon as measured in the laboratory frame by the ratio λ/v. A hypo- thetical observer flying with the particle would see a partic le ‘at rest’ in the laboratory ‘to live’ more than the ‘flying’ one. The authors quote Einstein’s 1905 paper for both slowing dow n of clocks and clock paradox. They do not quote other theoretical paper s, nor do they touch upon the debate about these issues. 5.4 Photons emitted and absorbed by nuclei without recoil 43Note 46. 44Ibid. 304. 265.4.1 An effect due to the temperature Around 1960, several groups began to test ‘time dilation’ an d gravitational red - shift by using M¨ ossbauer effect (see section 7.2 in the A ppendix). Among them, Robert Vivian Pound and Glen A. Rebka at Harvard a nd John Paul Schiffer and his collaborators at Harwell (England). Th ese two teams were primarily concerned with the test of gravitational red - shift. A histor- ical reconstruction of these researches has been made by Kla us Hentschel.45 Pound and Rebka realized that the emitter’s and absorber’s t emperatures, if different, may overshadow the searched gravitational effect . Therefore, they made a careful study of the “variation with temperature of th e energy of recoil - free gamma rays from solids”.46The emitting and absorbing nuclei were in two crystals held at different temperatures and the em itted or ab- sorbed photons were recoil - free, owing to the M¨ ossbauer eff ect. Pound and Rebka write: That temperature should influence the frequency exactly as w e observe is very simply explained. Thermally excited vibrat ions cause little broadening through first order Doppler effect un der the conditions obtained in solids because the value of any co m- ponent of the nuclear velocity averages very nearly to zero o ver the nuclear lifetime. The precision of the γray of Fe57requires the second order Doppler effect also to be considered. A shift to lower frequency with increased temperature results from th is be- cause the also well - defined average of the square of the veloc ity of the particle increases in direct proportion to the averag e ki- netic energy. As a consequence one would expect a temperatur e coefficient of frequency in a homogeneous solid, /parenleftBigg∂ν ∂T/parenrightBigg =−νCL 2Mc2(32) where CLis the specific heat of the lattice and Mis gram atomic weight of iron.47 Pound and Rebka did not explain how they got equation (32). Ac cording to Sherwin, this equation can be derived, in the high tempera ture approxi- mation, in the following way:48 45K. Hentschel, ‘Measurements of Gravitational Redshift bet ween 1959 and 1971’, Annals of Science 53 (1996), 269 - 295. 46R.V. Pound, and G.A. Rebka, jr. ‘Variation with temperature of the energy of recoil - free gamma rays from solids’, Physical Review Letters 4 (1960), 274 - 275. 47Ibid. 274. 48C.W. Sherwin, ‘Some Recent Experimental Tests of the Clock P aradox’, Physical Review 120 (1960), 17 - 21. 271. replace v2in the equation for the transverse Doppler effect ν=ν0/radicalBigg 1−v2 c2(33) approximated for v≪c, with the expression of the mean square veloc- ity of an atom in a crystal. ν0is the frequency emitted by the nucleus at rest. This calculation is performed for both emitter and a bsorber; 2. calculate the ratio between the difference of the Doppler f requencies so obtained and the temperature difference between emitter and absorber; the limit for ∆ T→0 yields equation (32), if we let ν0≈νs(where νs is the frequency associated with the source). It is worth stressing that while equation (32) describes the experimental results, the derivation given by Sherwin yields the equatio n used by Pound and Rebka only with the assumption ν0≈νs. Though legitimate from the numerical point of view, this assumption is conceptuall y wrong: the derivation is based on a comparison between the frequency νsemitted or the frequency νaabsorbed with the frequency ν0emitted by a nucleus at rest; while the experimental apparatus compare directly th e frequencies νs andνa. To illustrate the difference, let us consider the following situation. The observers AandSare moving in opposite directions with velocity v with respect to the laboratory. Then, if ν0is the frequency of a periodic phenomenon in the laboratory frame, its frequency seen by th e two observers AandSwill be, in the low velocity approximation ( v≪c): νs=νa≈ν0/parenleftBigg 1−v2 2c2/parenrightBigg (34) But the observer Awill attribute the frequency νato a periodic phenomenon occurring with frequency νsin the reference frame S: νa≈νs/parenleftBigg 1−2v2 c2/parenrightBigg (35) Similarly, the observer Swill attribute the frequency νsto a periodic phe- nomenon occurring with frequency νain the reference frame A: νs≈νa/parenleftBigg 1−2v2 c2/parenrightBigg (36) Pound and Rebka interpret equation (32) as due to the transve rse Doppler effect predicted for electromagnetic waves. However, equat ion (32) is asym- metric in the exchange between emitter and absorber, while e lectromagnetic theory predicts a symmetric effect. Furthermore, when emitt er and absorber 28are at the same temperature, the mean square value of the rela tive velocity of two nuclei (one in the emitter and the other in the absorber ) is given by< v2 rel>≈2< v2>(v≪c), where < v2>is the mean square velocity of a nucleus. If the effect under consideration is an undulatory Doppler effect, one should observe a frequency shift also whe n the emitter and absorber are at the same temperature: but this is not the c ase. (As a matter of fact, the emitter and the absorber at the same tempe rature are equivalent to the situation described just above in which th e source and the observer are moving toward or away from each other with const ant velocity V=√ < v2>(< v2>≪c2), with respect to the laboratory). Therefore, the origin of the observed asymmetric effect must be looked fo r somewhere else. Josephson has shown that the observed frequency shift may be derived from the conservation of mass - energy:49the emission of a photon by a nucleus in a crystal is accompanied by a decrease of its mass; this decrease, in turn, implies an increase of the crystal vibrational energy . A straightforward calculation, based on a simple model, shows that the energy t ransfer to the lattice ∆ Ev– and the corresponding decrease of the photon energy – is giv en, in the high temperature limit, by: ∆Ev≈3 2kT∆Eγ mc2(37) where ∆ Eγis the energy difference between the two nuclear energy level s andmthe atom mass. This equation is equivalent to (32). In the cas e of absorption, the energy ∆ Evis transferred by the lattice to the nucleus. Therefore: a) when emitter and absorber are at the same temperature the r esonance can occur and there is no frequency shift; b) when the emitter and absorber are at different temperature s, the ab- sorber will see a red or a blue shift in case of higher or lower t emper- ature of the emitter. In Josephson’s description, the asymmetry of the phenomeno n is due to a physical process involving an energy exchange between the n ucleus and the lattice: when the nucleus emits, the lattice gains energy; w hen the nucleus absorbs, the lattice looses energy. However, in spite of this result, Josephson writes: Recent experiments by M¨ ossbauer have shown that when low - energy γrays are emitted from nuclei in a solid a certain pro- portion of them are unaffected by the Doppler effect. It is the 49B.D. Josephson, ‘Temperature Dependent Shift of γRays Emitted by a Solid’, Phys- ical Review Letters 4 (1960), 341 - 342. 29purpose of this letter to show that they are nevertheless sub ject to a temperature - dependent shift to lower energy which can b e attributed to the relativistic time dilation caused by the m otion of the nuclei.50 Josephson’s stand is particularly interesting: after havi ng outlined a de- scription in terms of energy exchanges which is intrinsical ly asymmetric, he comes back to a special relativity interpretation based on t ime dilation (that is intrinsically symmetric). Pound and Rebka experiment concerns the emission of electro magnetic radiation from a nucleus and its absorption by another nucle us. The physical state of both emitter and absorber may influence the phenomen on. Then, we must adopt the corpuscular point of view developed by Schr¨ o dinger (section 4). However, since the experiment is performed with photons emitted and absorbed without recoil (M¨ ossbauer effect), the energy E1of equation (19) or equation (20) is the rest energy of the entire crystal and t he velocity v1 of equation (18) is the null velocity of the same crystal befo re the emission or the absorption of a photon. The velocity of the emitting or absorbing nucleus does not enter the picture. However, the nucleus is a ccelerated, ow- ing to the lattice vibrations of the crystal; since the measu rement concerns a statistically significant number of photons, the effective acceleration is the average acceleration experienced by the emitting or absorb ing nucleus. As shown in section 7.4 of the Appendix, the equation used by Pou nd and Re- bka can be deduced within general relativity (in the approxi mation of small gravitational fields):51the asymmetry of the experimental result arises from the asymmetry in the average pseudogravitational potentia l of the emitting and absorbing nuclei. (The acceleration enters the picture through its re- lated pseudogravitational potential; a gravitational pot ential modifies the rest energy of a particle and, therefore, also the energy of t he photons emit- ted by it; see section 7.3, starting from equation 47) and sec tion 7.4 in the Appendix. Pound and Rebka’s theoretical treatment appears untenable because based on special relativity. Josephson’s treatment, based on an energy ex- change between crystal lattice and emitting or absorbing nu clei, is intrin- sically asymmetric and could, therefore, be taken into cons ideration as a description of the experimental results. The formula deriv ed by Josephson is the same as that derived in section 7.3 of the Appendix, bas ed on general relativity, and applied to the case of small pseudogravitat ional potentials (compare equation 37 with equation 54). 50Ibid. 341. 51All along this paper, general relativity calculations are a lways approximated for small gravitational fields. This is due to the fact that all the disc ussed experiments fall into the case of small gravitational or pseudogravitational fields. 305.4.2 Nuclei in crystals on rotating systems In this kind of experiments, based on the M¨ ossbauer effect, e mitter and absorber are on a rotating system at different distances from the center. The first paper on this subject - by Hay, Schiffer, Cranshaw and Egelstaff - appeared in 1960.52,53The source was mounted on the external surface of a 0.8cmdiameter cylinder; the absorber on the internal surface of a 13.28cm diameter cylinder rigidly connected to the inner one. The γrays passing through the absorber were detected by a suitable counter at r est in the laboratory: the function of the counter was that of finding th e resonance condition, i.e. the condition in which the γrays emitted by the source are absorbed by the absorber. The unit was rotated up to a maximum speed of 500 revolutions per second. The emitting and absorbing nucl eus was Fe57. The article begins with: In an adjoining paper an experiment is described in which the change of frequency in a photon passing between two points of different gravitational potential has been measured. Einst ein’s principle of equivalence states that a gravitational field i s lo- cally indistinguishable from an accelerated system. It the refore seemed desirable to measure the shift in the energy of 14 kev gamma rays from Fe57in an accelerated system... The expected shift can be calculated in two ways. One can trea t the acceleration as an effective gravitational field and calc ulate the difference in potential between the source and absorber, or one can obtain the same answer using the time dilatation of special relativity. The expected fractional shift in the en ergy of the gamma ray is54 (R2 1−R2 2)ω2 2c2= 2.44×10−20ω2(38) The questions aroused by this paper have been taken up again b y Champ- eney and Moon.55In their experiment, however, the source and the absorber were placed at the opposite end of a rotor diameter. 52H.J. Hay, J.P. Schiffer, T.E. Cranshaw and P.A. Egelstaff, ‘Me asurement of the red - shift in an accelerated system using the M¨ ossbauer effect in Fe57’,Physical Review Letters 4 (1960), 165. 53In 1953, W.G. Davey and P.B. Moon, used a rotor for studying th e resonant scattering of the198Hg γ - rays from liquid mercury. According to the authors, ‘At hig h speeds the Doppler effect compensates for the energy lost to nuclear recoil and permits resonant scattering.. . ’: W.G. Davey and P.B. Moon, ‘The Resonant sca ttering of198HgGamma Rays’, Proceedings of the Physical Society 66 (1953), 956 - 957. 54Ibid. 165. 55D.C. Champeney and P.B. Moon, ‘Absence of Doppler Shift for G amma Ray Source and Detector on Same Circular Orbit’, Proceedings of the Physical Society 77 (1961), 350 - 352. 31Champeney and Moon write: Reporting a test of the effect of circular motion on the resona nt frequency of gamma - ray transition in57Fe, Hay, Schiffer, Cran- shaw and Egelstaff point out that one can treat the accelerati on as an effective gravitational field and calculate the frequen cy shift from the difference of potential between source and absorber , or one can obtain the same answer by using the time dilatation of special relativity. For their arrangement, with the source at the center and the absorber at the periphery of the rotating system, the same re sult also follows from the argument that since source and absorbe r have relative velocity v(≪c) in a direction perpendicular to the line joining them, there exists a transverse Doppler effect g iving a fractional frequency shift v2/2c2. It is perhaps surprising that the na¨ ıve use of this formula, without any account been taken of acceleration, should give the corr ect answer; an indication of the subtleties that may be involved is obtained by considering source and absorber to move on the sa me circle, e.g. at opposite points on the periphery. Their pseu do - gravitational potentials are equal, so are their time - dila tation, yet their relative velocity is 2 v. ... Since in this laboratory we were undertaking a ‘source at cen - ter’ experiment similar to that of Hay et al., we decided also to make an experimental test of the ‘peripherally opposite’ ar range- ment.56 The experiment with emitter and absorber at the opposite end s of a diameter shows that there is no frequency shift. Champeney and Moon st ress “the subtleties involved” in the rotor experiments; however, th ey do not take position. In a following paper, Champeney, Isaak and Khan reported mor e accu- rate measurements taken with the source at the center and the absorber at the tip of the rotor, as in the experiment by Hay et al. discuss ed above. They reported also on an experiment with the source at the tip and t he absorber at the center that confirmed the asymmetry of the phenomenon, due to the interchange of the positions between source and absorber. T hey gave also a theoretical treatment of the rotor experiment based on spe cial relativity: in spite of this approach, they obtained a formula for the fre quency shift 56Ibid. 350. 32which is asymmetrical in the exchange between emitter and ab sorber.57At the beginning of their paper, Champeney, Isaak and Khan writ e: We describe here some measurements of the resonant absorpti on of gamma rays in a M¨ ossbauer system fixed to a high speed rotor , with the source at the center and the absorber at the tip of the rotor and vice versa. The aim of the experiments is to measure the effects of time dilatation in such a system and compare the m with the expectations of relativity theory. ... On the ground of relativity theory we expect the frequency of the radiation arriving at the absorber (as measured by a cloc k on the absorber) to vary with rotor speed according to: ν1 ν0=/radicalBig 1−ω2r2s/c2 /radicalBig 1−ω2r2a/c2≈1 +ω2(r2 a−r2 s) 2c2(39) where ν1is the frequency measured at rotor angular velocity ω, ν0is the frequency of the emitted radiation as measured by a clock on the source, rsandraare the radii of the source and absorber orbits and cis the velocity of light. ... Equation (39) is commonly derived from standard Doppler effe ct equations of special relativity.58 Let us see how an asymmetrical formula for the shift of the spe ctral lines is obtained starting from a symmetrical one: 1. write the formula for the Doppler effect in the case in which the ab- sorber is considered at rest and the emitter in motion; νa=νs/radicalBig 1−v2 sa/c2 1−(vsa/c) cosθa(40) θais the angle between the propagation direction of the photon and thexaaxis and /vector vsais the velocity of the emitter, parallel to the xaaxis; both quantities are evaluated in the reference frame of the a bsorber; 2. write the same relation by considering the emitter at rest and the absorber in motion: νa=νs1−(vas/c) cosθs/radicalBig 1−v2as/c2(41) 57D.C. Champeney, , G.R. Isaak and A.M. Khan, ‘A time dilation e xperiment based on the M¨ ossbauer effect’, Proceedings of the Physical Society 85 (1965), 583 - 593. 58Ibid. 583 - 584. 33θs/\egatio\slash=θais the angle between the propagation direction of the photon and the xs≡xaaxis, and /vector vas=−/vector vsais the velocity of the absorber parallel to the xsaxis; both quantities are evaluated in the reference frame of the emitter.59 Equation (41) is obtained from (40) by putting /vector vas=−/vector vsaand using the relation cosθa=cosθs−vas/c 1−(vas/c) cosθs(42) that connects the cosines of the angle between the propagati on direction of the photon and the xa/saxis as seen by the two reference frames. The transverse Doppler effect is obtained, by definition, when θa=π/2, i.e. when the observer sees the source emitting towards him at right an gle with respect to its line of motion: all the quantities involved are referr ed to the reference frame of the observer. The frequency shift is given by either equation (40) or (41): the change of reference frame (absorber or emitter con sidered at rest) does not change the physics. In the paper under discussion, t he change of reference frame is accompanied by a change in the definition o f the transverse Doppler effect: in fact, in passing from equation (40) to equa tion (41), θs is put equal to π/2 in the last one. In this way, the desired asymmetry is obtained. Of course, we can also rewrite equation (41) as: νs=νa/radicalBig 1−v2as/c2 1−(vas/c) cosθs(43) If we now consider the source as absorber and the absorber as t he source, we can correctly put θs=π/2 and see again that there is perfect symmetry between source and absorber. At the end of the derivation Champeney, Isaak and Khan write: These equations...are of course derived on the basis of syst ems in uniform relative motion, and in applying them to our experim ent we are making tacit use of the hypothesis that, if an ideal clo ck moves non - uniformly through an inertial frame, then accele ra- tion as such as no effect on the rate of the clock. Experiments such as our are therefore combined tests of special relativi ty and of this hypothesis. In so far as this hypothesis may be justifi ed for nuclear clocks such as ours by the general theory, then to that extent ours is an experiment in the general theory.60 59Ibid. 60Ibid. 584. 34Similar experiments, with the source at the center and the ab sorber at the tip, have been made by Walter K¨ undig.61His theoretical approach is similar to that of the other experimenters: When the experiment is analysed in the inertial frame of the source, the result follows from the time dilatation in the sp ecial theory of relativity. [...] However, when the experiment is analysed in a reference fram e Kattached to the accelerated absorber, the problem could be treated by the principle of equivalence and the general theo ry of relativity.62 None of these papers recalls that a rotating disc experiment is implicitly con- tained in the introduction of the paper on general relativit y and discussed in detail by Einstein in the 1921 edition of his book on relati vity (see section 3.3). In the description of the experiments within special r elativity, all pa- pers assume (implicitly or explicitly) that electromagnet ic radiation can be treated as an undulatory periodic phenomenon and that nucle i act as clocks. In section 7.3 of the Appendix, the main steps of the calculat ion yielding the observed asymmetrical result are reported. The calcula tion is based on a general relativity approach. The experiments show that th e energy of photons emitted or absorbed by nuclei depends on the acceler ation of the emitter or absorber. All experiments exploit the M¨ ossbauer effect, i.e. the emis sion and ab- sorption of photons without recoil by nuclei embedded in cry stalline solids. In standard treatments, the M¨ ossbauer effect is described i n terms of quan- tum mechanics and involves, in principle, the nuclear and th e vibrational quantum states: the M¨ ossbauer effect corresponds to the emi ssion or ab- sorption of a γphoton without change of the phonon occupation number. Therefore, the only physical quantity involved is the energ y difference ∆ E between the two quantum nuclear states responsible for the e mission or ab- sorption of the photon. This theoretical background is shar ed by all authors. On this background two assumptions are superimposed: the eq uivalence principle (in its weak form) and the description of γradiation as an un- dulatory periodic phenomenon. The equivalence principle, however, is used only for claiming that the same predictions can be derived fr om general and special relativity. It is assumed that nuclei are clocks and that they emit pe- riodic waves; the experiments are described within special relativity in spite of the fact that the experimental results are asymmetrical i n the exchange 61W. K¨ undig, ‘Measurement of the Transverse Doppler Effect in an Accelerated Sys- tem’,Physical Review 129 (1963), 2371-2375. 62Ibid. 2371. 35of the two observers (source and absorber). The corpuscular description of electromagnetic radiation and the Schr¨ odinger treatment discussed in sec- tion 4 is completely ignored in spite of the fact that it leads naturally to the asymmetrical results shown by experiments. 5.5 Atomic clocks around the Earth An experiment of this kind has been performed by Hafele and Ke ating with atomic clocks flown on commercial jet flights around the Earth .63The the- oretical treatment of the experiment has been given by Hafel e.64,65The ide- alized experiment may be described as follows: Itwo identical clocks OandO′are initially in the same point Pat the equator IIthe clock O′is brought at height hand set in motion eastward or westward at velocity von a circle of radius R+h;Ris the Earth radius and vis the ground velocity of the clock ( vis positive for eastward flight and negative for westward) IIIafter a circumnavigation at the height h, clock O′is brought back to point P The climb and the descent of the clock O′are neglected in the theoretical description. Hafele’s treatment is based on a general relat ivity approach; the metric used is that of a nonrotating reference system cen tered in a ho- mogeneous gravitational sphere (the Earth); the predictio n of the theory is summarized by the equation (in the approximation of small ve locities and small gravitational fields:66 ∆t(R+h) ∆t(R)=/braceleftBig 1−1 c2/bracketleftBig GM R+h+1 2[v+ (R+h)Ω]2/bracketrightBig/bracerightBig /bracketleftBig 1−1 c2/parenleftBig GM R+1 2Ω2R2/parenrightBig/bracketrightBig (44) 63J.C. Hafele and R.E. Keating, ‘Around - the World - Atomic Clo cks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains’, Science 177 (1972), 166 - 168; J.C. Hafele and R.E. Keating, ‘Around - the World - Atomic Clocks: Observed Relativistic T ime Gains’, Science 177 (1972), 168 - 170. 64J.C. Hafele, ‘Relativistic Time for Terrestrial Circumnav igations’, American Journal of Physics 40 (1972), 81 - 85. 65F. Winterberg, in 1956, developed the theory of a possible ex periment for comparing the behaviour of an atomic clock on the Earth with that of an id entical clock on a satellite: the suggested experiment was considered as a test of general relativity. The theoretical approach was the same as that used by Hafele. Before the disco very of the M¨ ossbauer effect, the idea of experiments with satellites was consider ed as the most at hand. Also Pound and Rebka begin their first paper on the gravitational r ed - shift by referring to a possible experiment with satellites (see note 72). Then the y go on to consider the possible use of the M¨ ossbauer effect. 66Note 64 on 83. 36where, Gis the gravitational constant, Mthe mass of the Earth and Ω its angular velocity. In the experimental papers Hafele and Kea ting clarify their position: One of the most enduring scientific debates of this century is the relativistic clock “paradox” or problem, which stemmed ori gi- nally from an alleged inconsistency in predicted time differ ences between traveling and reference clocks after a round trip. T his seemingly endless theoretical debate, which has flared up re cently with renewed vigor, begs for a convincing empirical resolut ion with macroscopic clocks.67 And: In science, relevant experimental facts supersede theoret ical ar- guments. In an attempt to throw some empirical light on the question of whether macroscopic clocks record time in accor dance with the conventional interpretation of Einstein’s relati vity the- ory, we flew four cesium beam atomic clocks around the world on commercial jet flights, first eastward, then westward.68 The conclusion is: In conclusion, we have shown that the effects of travel on the t ime recording behavior on macroscopic clocks are in reasonable ac- cord with predictions of the conventional theory of relativ ity...69 Hafele and Keating’s description is basically founded on th e hypothesis ac- cording to which “all macroscopic physical clocks, irrespe ctive of design or complexity, record proper time.”70 However, a complete different description is possible. In at omic clocks atoms act as microscopic locking devices of frequency of the microwave ab- sorbed by atoms: the locking is assured by the matching betwe en the energy hνof the microwave and the energy difference ∆ Ebetween the two quan- tum states of the transition. As shown by the experiments on g ravitational red - shift71,72and by rotor experiments (section 5.4.2), the energy ∆ Eand, therefore, the energy of the photons emitted or absorbed by n uclei or atoms depends on the potential due to gravitation or acceleration . It follows that 67Note 63 on 166. 68Ibid. 168. 69Ibid. 170. 70Note 64 on 84. 71T.E. Cranshaw, J.P. Schiffer and A.B. Whitehead, ‘Measureme nt of the gravitational red - shift using the M¨ ossbauer effect in Fe57’,Physical Review Letters 4 (1960), 163 - 164. 72R.V. Pound and G.A. Rebka jr. ‘Apparent weight of photons’, Physical Review Letters 4 (1960), 337 - 341. 37the fundamental period of atomic clocks depends on gravitat ional or pseudo- gravitational potential as does the energy of photons absor bed by atoms or nuclei. Therefore, an experiment like that performed by Haf ele and Keating shows that atomic clocks behave in accordance with the (theo retical and experimental) acquired knowledge about the energy depende nce of photons absorbed by nuclei or atoms on gravitational or pseudogravi tational poten- tials. In fact, equation (44) can be written down directly us ing the equation ∆E= ∆E0/radicalBigg 1 +2χ c2(45) that gives the energy difference ∆ Ebetween two quantum states of an atom at rest in a gravitational potential χas a function of the energy difference ∆E0corresponding to a null potential (see section 7.5 in the App endix, starting from equation (55)). Hafele and Keating’s experiment cannot be considered as a pr actical realization of the clock paradox, because the clock paradox requires that at least a fraction of the journey of the travelling clock be an i nertial motion or - as in the case of Bailey et al. experiment - an accelerated (circular) motion during which, however, the acceleration does not infl uence the clock. In the case of atomic clocks the experimental evidence discu ssed above shows that their behaviour is influenced by acceleration just in th e way predicted by general relativity. This remind us of the statement by Hafele and Keating that “In science, relevant experimental facts supersede theoretical argume nts”. This state- ment - as it stands - can hardly be accepted. The discussion de veloped above shows that it does not apply precisely to Hafele and Kea ting’s experi- ment, because the “experimental facts” found by Hafele and K eating can be described in two basically different ways. The two alternati ve descriptions should be comparatively evaluated on the basis of the criter ia contained in point 1.c of section 2 and possibly tested with other experim ents. (For in- stance, since the lifetime of muons does not depend on accele ration and, therefore, from gravitational potential, it may be argued t hat two muons - based clocks should read the same after a Hafele - Keating tri p of one of them). 6 Conclusions The present study has dealt with cases of a crucial step in exp erimental disciplines: the evaluation procedure that establishes if and how the predic- tions of a theory are in conformity with experiment. In the ca se of ‘time dilation’ experiments, this evaluation procedure has been characterized by the use of additional hypotheses not necessary for the formal development of 38the theories under test: the assumption that allclocks measure proper time ; the idea that atoms (or nuclei) emit periodic waves and, cons equently, that atoms (or nuclei) can be considered as clocks. The epistemol ogical status of these hypotheses is different: while the one about proper tim e is a legitimate (though bold) additional hypothesis, the other two seem unt enable on the basis of the acquired theoretical and experimental knowled ge. The hypotheses on clocks and proper time has been used by Hafe le and Keating in the conception and interpretation of their exper iment with macro- scopic clocks around the Earth. This assumption is necessar y for considering their experiment as a test on time dilation. In section 5.5 we have shown that their experiment can be interpreted without this assum ption: if we drop it, Hafele and Keating experiment should be considered as a c orroboration of the predicted effect of gravitational or pseudo - gravitat ional fields on the energy of photons emitted or absorbed by atoms. The two other assumptions about electromagnetic radiation and atoms arenecessary for considering the experiments performed with atoms in flig ht and with nuclei in crystals as tests of ‘time dilation’. If we drop these two assumptions, these experiments appear instead as tests of relativistic dynamics (atoms in flight) or of predictions of general relat ivity about how gravitational or pseudo - gravitational fields influence the rest energy of an atom or a nucleus and, consequently, the energy of an emitted or absorbed photon (nuclei in crystals). In conclusion, the only type of experiment that can be consid ered as a direct test on ‘time dilation’, without using additional hypotheses , is the one performed with particles in inertial flight. Though all cases have historical, methodological and epist emological rel- evance, the most intriguing one is that associated with the u se of the hypoth- esis that atoms, taken as individual entities , emit periodic waves and can, therefore, be considered as clocks. In fact, it turns out tha t an idea based on nineteenth century’s background knowledge, has survived till our days in spite of the lack of specific theoretical and experimental support. This lasting survival is likely due to the fact that the undulator y description of electromagnetic radiation has entered a shared image of the physical world in late nineteenth century and has withstood the basic challen ges of quantum theoretical and experimental physics. The taking root of th is image of the physical world has occurred to such a profound degree that th e undulatory description has been used also when the corpuscular treatme nt was the most suitable or the only one that could be applied: in this respec t, the fate of the corpuscular treatment of the Doppler effect is strikingl y illuminating. We believe that our study has presented an example of how a sha red image of the physical world can survive in spite of the fact th at it has become incompatible with the advancement of theoretical an d experimental knowledge. Since a (more or less) shared image of the physica l world guides 39the physicists in conceiving theories and devising experim ents, it influences also the interplay between theory and experiment. These his torical processes are not easily dealt with since they operate “under the surfa ce” and cannot be correlated with specific historical events. However, the ir role appears to be more relevant than usually acknowledged. 407 Appendix 7.1 Atomic Cesium clocks Atomic clocks are based on the following idea. Take a cell con taining atoms of an element in the gaseous state and consider two suitable q uantum states of these atoms separated by an energy gap ∆ E. If we illuminate the gas by an electromagnetic radiation whose hνequals ∆ E, then this radiation will be absorbed by the gas. A radiation detector Dis put behind the gas cell and is connected to the apparatus MW producing the electromagnetic radiation through a feedback circuit. If the energy hνof the electromagnetic radiation changes, the gas no longer absorbs, the radiation is revealed by the detector Dthat informs the apparatus MW that the energy hνmust be adjusted. The atoms are used as locking devices for the energy hνof the electromagnetic radiation . The actual standard unit of time is based on aCesium133clock; the atomic transition used is the hyperfine transitio n F= 3↔F= 4; the electromagnetic radiation that can induce the trans ition is a microwave of frequency ν= 9192631770. Hafele and Keating used cesium clocks for their experiments (see section 5.5).73 7.2 The M¨ ossbauer effect At the end of the fifties, Rudolf M¨ ossbauer found that nuclei in crystalline solids can emit and absorb γphotons without energy loss due to the atom recoil: more precisely, the recoil momentum is taken up by th e crystal as a whole instead of by the emitting nucleus, thereby reducing t he energy loss of the photon by a factor equal to the number of atoms in the cryst al.74As a result, if AandBare two nuclei in relative rest and if Aemits a photon, then this photon can be absorbed by Bif and only if the energy difference ∆ E between the two quantum states that take part in the transiti on is the same forAandB. This resonant absorption is possible inasmuch as the uncer - tainty in the energy of the emitted photon is much greater tha n the energy given to the crystal in the recoil. If, for some reason, ∆ Eaof the absorbing nucleus is different from ∆ Esof the emitting one, then the absorption can- not take place: in order to absorb the photon the absorbing nu cleus must move toward or recede from the emitting one with the appropri ate velocity. 73For a detailed treatment of Cesium clocks, see, for instance reference: C. Audoin, ‘Cesium Beam Frequency Standards: Classical and Optically Pumped’, Metrologia 29 (1992) , 113 - 134. 74On the M¨ ossbauer effect, see for instance: H. Frauenfelder, The M¨ ossbauer effect , (New York, 1962)that includes also reprints of original pap ers; Gunter K Wertheim, M¨ ossbauer effect: Principles and Applications , (New York, 1964), for an elementary treat- ment of the various topics. See also the references quoted in reference 45. 41This velocity is given by v≈c∆Es−∆Ea ∆Es(46) Ifv >0, then the absorbing nucleus must move toward the emitting o ne; if v <0, the absorbing nucleus must recede from the emitter. It is a lso possible to detect changes in ∆ Esmaller than the uncertainty in the energy of the emitted photons by modulating the absorption through a peri odic motion of absorber (or the emitter). M¨ ossbauer worked with the 129 KeV transition ofIr191) that allowed energy resolution of the order of 10−11; some years later, with the 14 .4KeVtransition of Fe57, resolution in energy of the order of 10−13were attained. It is clear why the M¨ ossbauer effect has been rapidly applied to the study of relativistic effects: it is possible to detect changes in e nergy of the order of magnitude predicted by special and general relativity. 7.3 The rotating disc Let us consider a disc rotating with constant angular veloci ty Ω: a source s and an absorber aof photons are placed on the same radius of the disc at different distances from the center ( Rs, Ra). If we have a particle of mass Mat rest in a gravitational field whose potential is χ, then its energy is given by:75 E=Mc2/radicalBigg 1 +2χ c2(47) For an emitting nucleus in an excited state, the previous equ ation - in the case of the rotor experiment - can be written as: E= (mc2+ ∆E)/radicalBigg 1 +2χ c2= (mc2+ ∆E)/radicalBigg 1−Ω2R2 s c2(48) where mis the mass of the particle in its ground state, ∆ Eis the en- ergy difference between the two quantum states and χ=−1/2(Ω2R2 s) is the pseudo - gravitational potential due to acceleration. T he energy of the photon emitted by the source will then be given by: εs= ∆E/radicalBigg 1−Ω2R2 s c2(49) and the energy of the photon that can be absorbed by the absorb er by: εa= ∆E/radicalBigg 1−Ω2R2 a c2(50) 75See, for instance, note 16 p. 387. 42Therefore: εs εa=/radicalBig 1−Ω2R2s/c2 /radicalBig 1−Ω2R2a/c2(51) In the approximation of small velocities (Ω R≪c): εa−εs εs≈1 2Ω2 c2(R2 s−R2 a) (52) This equation describes the asymmetrical effect observed in experiments. 7.4 The temperature effect of Pound and Rebka Equation (47) can be applied to the case of tridimensional ha rmonic oscil- lators of mass min thermal equilibrium. In the case of sufficiently high temperatures, the average pseudogravitational potential χis given by: χ=−3kT 2m(53) where we have neglected in the denominator the term ∆ E/c2with respect to the mass mof the atom in its ground state. It follows: εa−εs≈ −∆E3k 2mc2(Ta−Ts) (54) that leads at once to equation (32) and correctly describes t he experimental results. 7.5 Atomic clocks around the Earth Hafele and Keating have derived their equation within a spac e - time ap- proach. We shall derive the same equation starting from the e quation ∆E= ∆E0/radicalBigg 1 +2χ c2(55) that gives the energy difference ∆ Ebetween two quantum states of an atom at rest in a gravitational potential χas a function of the energy difference ∆E0corresponding to a null potential (see section 7.3 in this Ap pendix). Since the fundamental period of an atomic clock in a null grav itational po- tential is given by T0=h ∆E0(56) we get from equation (55) for the fundamental period T(R) of a clock at rest at the equator (for small gravitational potentials): T(R) =T0/braceleftbigg 1−1 c2[ϕG(R) +ϕA(R)]/bracerightbigg (57) 43where we are using the same symbols used in section 5.5 and whe reϕG(R) is the gravitational potential of the Earth at the equator an dϕA(R) is the pseudogravitational potential at the equator due to the cen tripetal acceler- ation. It follows that: T(R) =T0/bracketleftbigg 1 +1 c2/parenleftbiggGM R+1 2Ω2R2/parenrightbigg/bracketrightbigg (58) For the clock flying on the equatorial circumference of radiu sR+hwe get instead: T(R+h) =T0/braceleftbigg 1 +1 c2/bracketleftbiggGM R+h+1 2[v+ (R+h)Ω]2/bracketrightbigg/bracerightbigg (59) where vis the velocity of the flying clock with respect to the ground: it is positive for eastward flights and negative for westward fli ghts. Since the intervals of time shown by a clock is inversely proportional to its fundamental period, we get at once equation (44) by taking the ratio betwe en the two last equations. 44

arXiv:physics/0008013v1 [physics.optics] 5 Aug 2000Negative Group Velocity Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princet on, NJ 08544 (July 23, 2000) 1 Problem Consider a variant on the physical situation of “slow light” [1, 2] in which two closely spaced spectral lines are now both optically pumped to show that the group velocity can be negative at the central frequency, which leads to apparent superlumi nal behavior. 1.1 Negative Group Velocity In more detail, consider a classical model of matter in which spectral lines are associated with oscillators. In particular, consider a gas with two clo sely spaced spectral lines of angular frequencies ω1,2=ω0±∆/2, where ∆ ≪ω0. Each line has the same damping constant (and spectral width) γ. Ordinarily, the gas would exhibit strong absorption of ligh t in the vicinity of the spectral lines. But suppose that lasers of frequencies ω1andω2pump the both oscillators into inverted populations. This can be described classically by assignin g negative oscillator strengths to these oscillators [3]. Deduce an expression for the group velocity vg(ω0) of a pulse of light centered on frequency ω0in terms of the (single electron) plasma frequency ωpof the medium, given by ω2 p=4πNe2 m, (1) where Nis the number density of atoms, and eandmare the charge and mass of an electron. Give a condition on the line separation ∆ compared to the line width γsuch that the group velocity vg(ω0) is negative. In a recent experiment by Wang et al.[4], a group velocity of vg=−c/310, where cis the speed of light in vacuum, was demonstrated in cesium vapor us ing a pair of spectral lines with separation ∆ /2π≈2 MHz and linewidth γ/2π≈0.8 MHz. 1.2 Propagation of a Monochromatic Plane Wave Consider a wave with electric field E0eiω(z/c−t)that is incident from z <0 on a medium with negative group velocity that extends from z= 0 to a. Ignore reflection at the boundaries, as is reasonable if the index of refraction n(ω) is near unity. Deduce a transformation between the form of the wave inside the medium to that in the region a < z . This solution for a single, arbitrary frequency can now be applied to the Fourie r analysis of a general waveform. Particularly simple results can be obtained when you make th e (unphysical) assumption that theωn(ω) varies linearly with frequency about a central frequency ω0. 11.3 Propagation of a Sharp Wave Front In the approximation that ωnvaries linearly with ω, deduce the waveforms in the regions 0< z < a anda < z for an incident pulse δ(z/c−t), where δis the Dirac delta function. Show that the pulse emerges out of the gain region at z=aat time t=a/vg, which appears to be earlier than when it enters this region if the group velo city is negative. Show also that inside the gain region a pulse propagates backwards from z=aat time t=a/vg<0 to z= 0 at t= 0, at which time it appears to annihilate the incident pulse . 1.4 Propagation of a Gaussian Pulse As a more physical example, deduce the waveforms in the regio ns 0< z < a anda < z for a Gaussian incident pulse E0e−(z/c−t)2/2τ2eiω0(z/c−t). Carry the frequency expansion of ωn(ω) to second order to obtain conditions of validity of the analysi s such as maximum pulsewidth τ, maximum length aof the gain region, and maximum time of advance of the emergin g pulse. Consider the time required to generate a pulse of risetime τwhen assessing whether the time advance in a negative group velocity medium can lead to super luminal signal propagation. 2 Solution The propagation of electromagnetic waves at frequencies ne ar those of spectral lines of a medium was first extensively discussed by Sommerfeld and Bri llouin [5]. The solution pre- sented here is based on the work of Garrett and McCumber [6] as extended by Chiao et al. [7, 8]. 2.1 Negative Group Velocity In a medium of index of refraction n(ω), the dispersion relation can be written k=ωn c, (2) where kis the wave number. The group velocity is then given by vg=Re/bracketleftBiggdω dk/bracketrightBigg =1 Re[dk/dω ]=c Re[d(ωn)/dω]=c 1 +ωRe[dn/dω ]. (3) We see from eq. (3) that if the index of refraction decreases r apidly enough with frequency, the group velocity can be negative. It is well known that the i ndex of refraction decreases rapidly with frequency near an absorption line, where “anom alous” wave propagation effects can occur [5]. However, the absorption makes it difficult to st udy these effects. The insight of Garret and McCumber [6] and of Chiao et al. [7, 8, 9, 10, 11] is that demonstrations of negative group velocity are possible in media with inverted populations, so that gain rather than absorption occurs at the frequencies of interest. This was dramatically realized in the experiment of Wang et al. [4] by use of a closely spaced pair of gain lines, as perhaps fir st suggested by Steinberg and Chiao [9]. 2We use a classical oscillator model for the index of refracti on. The index nis the square root of the dielectric constant ǫ, which is in turn related to the atomic polarizability α according to D=ǫE=E+ 4πP=E(1 + 4 πNα), (4) (in Gaussian units) where Dis the electric displacement, Eis the electric field and Pis the polarization density. Then, the index of refraction of a dil ute gas is n=√ǫ≈1 + 2πNα. (5) The polarizability αis obtained from the dipole moment p=ex=αEinduced by electric fieldE. In the case of a single spectral line of frequency ωj, we say that the charge eis bound to the (fixed) nucleus by a spring of constant K=mω2 j, and the motion is subject to the damping force −mγj˙x, where the dot indicates differentiation with respect to tim e. The equation of motion in the presence of an electromagnetic wav e of frequency ωis ¨x+γj˙x+ω2 jx=eE m=eE0 meiωt. (6) Hence, x=eE m1 ω2 j−ω2−iγjω=eE mω2 j−ω2+iγjω (ω2 j−ω2)2+γ2 jω2, (7) and the polarizability is α=e2 mω2 j−ω2+iγjω (ω2 j−ω2)2+γ2 jω2. (8) In the present problem, we have two spectral lines, ω1,2=ω0±∆/2, both of oscillator strength −1 to indicate that the populations of both lines are inverted , and with damping constants γ1=γ2=γ. In this case, the polarizability is given by α=−e2 m(ω0−∆/2)2−ω2+iγω ((ω0−∆/2)2−ω2)2+γ2ω2−e2 m(ω0+ ∆/2)2−ω2+iγω ((ω0+ ∆/2)2−ω2)2+γ2ω2 ≈ −e2 mω2 0−∆ω0−ω2+iγω (ω2 0−∆ω0−ω2)2+γ2ω2−e2 mω2 0+ 2∆ω0−ω2+iγω (ω2 0+ ∆ω0−ω2)2+γ2ω2, (9) where the approximation is obtained by the neglect of terms i n ∆2compared to those in ∆ω0. For a probe beam at frequency ω, the index of refraction (5) has the form n(ω)≈1−ω2 p 2/bracketleftBiggω2 0−∆ω0−ω2+iγω (ω2 0−∆ω0−ω2)2+γ2ω2+ω2 0+ ∆ω0−ω2+iγω (ω2 0+ ∆ω0−ω2)2+γ2ω2/bracketrightBigg , (10) where ωpis the plasma frequency given by eq. (1). This illustrated in Figure 1. The index at the central frequency ω0is n(ω0)≈1−iω2 pγ (∆2+γ2)ω0≈1−iω2 p ∆2γ ω0, (11) 3-0.000002 00.000002 frequency Re(n□-□1) Im(n) Δ Figure 1: The real and imaginary parts of the index of refract ion in a medium with two spectral lines that have been pumped to inverted pop ulations. The lines are separated by frequency ∆ and have widths γ= 0.4∆. where the second approximation holds when γ≪∆. The electric field of a continuous probe wave then propagates according to E(z, t) =ei(kz−ω0t)=eiω0(n(ω0)z/c−t)≈ez/[∆2c/γω2 p]eiω0(z/c−t). (12) From this we see that at frequency ω0the phase velocity is c, and the medium has an amplitude gain length ∆2c/γω2 p. To obtain the group velocity (3) at frequency ω0, we need the derivative d(ωn) dω/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ω0≈1−2ω2 p(∆2−γ2) (∆2+γ2)2, (13) where we have neglected terms in ∆ and γcompared to ω0. From eq. (3), we see that the group velocity can be negative if γ <∆, (14) which condition was satisfied in the experiment of Wang et al. [4]. For γ≪∆, our model predicts that vg≈ −c 2∆2 ω2p. (15) A value of vg≈ −c/310 as in the experiment of Wang corresponds to ∆ /ωp≈1/12. In this case, the gain length ∆2c/γω2 pwas approximately 40 cm. For later use we record the second derivative, d2(ωn) dω2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ω0≈8iω2 pγ(3∆2−γ2) (∆2+γ2)3≈24iω2 p ∆2γ ∆2(16) where the second approximation holds if γ≪∆. 42.2 Propagation of a Monochromatic Plane Wave To illustrate the optical properties of a medium with negati ve group velocity, we consider the propagation of an electromagnetic wave through it. The m edium extends from z= 0 to a, and is surrounded by vacuum. Because the index of refractio n (10) is near unity in the frequency range of interest, we ignore reflections at the bou ndaries of the medium. A monochromatic plane wave of frequency ω, polarized in the xdirection and incident fromz <0, propagates with phase velocity cin vacuum. Its electric field can be written Eω(z, t) =E0eiωz/ce−iωt≡Eω(z)e−iωt(z <0). (17) Inside the medium this wave propagates with phase velocity c/n(ω) according to Eω(z, t) =E0eiωnz/ce−iωt(0< z < a ). (18) When the wave emerges into vacuum at z=a, the phase velocity is again c, but it has accumulated a phase lag of ( ω/c)(n−1)a, and so appears as Eω(z, t) =E0eiωa(n−1)/ceiωz/ce−iωt=E0eiωan/ce−iω(t−(z−a)/c)(a < z). (19) It is noteworthy that a monochromatic wave for z > a has the same form as that inside the medium if we make the substitutions z→a, and t→t−z−a c. (20) Since an arbitrary waveform can be expressed in terms of mono chromatic plane waves via Fourier analysis, we can use these substitutions to convert any wave in the region 0 < z < a to its continuation in the region a < z. A general relation can be deduced in the case where the second and higher derivatives of ωn(ω) are very small. We can then write ωn(ω)≈ω0n(ω0) +c vg(ω−ω0), (21) where vgis the group velocity for a pulse with central frequency ω0. Using this in eq. (18), we have Eω(z, t)≈E0eiω0z(n(ω0)/c−1/vg)eiωz/v ge−iωt=Eω(z)e−iωt(0< z < a ). (22) In this approximation, the Fourier component Eω(z) at any frequency ωof a wave inside the gain medium is related to that of the incident wave by replaci ng the frequency dependence eiωz/cbyeiωz/v gand multiplying by the constant phase factor eiω0z(n(ω0)/c−1/vg). This means that an incident wave E(z, t) =f(z/c−t) =/integraldisplay∞ −∞dω E ω(z)e−iωt(z <0) (23) propagates inside the gain medium with the same pulse shape f, but multiplied by a constant phase factor and with z/creplaced by z/vg. Thus, E(z, t)≈  f(z/c−t) (z <0), eiω0z(n(ω0)/c−1/vg)f(z/vg−t) (0 < z < a ), eiω0a(n(ω0)/c−1/vg)f(z/c−t−a(1/c−1/vg)) ( a < z),(24) 5where we have used the substitutions (20) to relate the wavef orm for a < z to that for 0< z < a . 2.3 Propagation of a Sharp Wave Front To assess the effect of a medium with negative group velocity o n the propagation of a signal, we first consider a waveform with a sharp front, as rec ommended by Sommerfeld and Brillouin [5]. As an extreme but convenient example, we take the to incident pulse to be a Dirac delta function, E(z, t) =E0δ(z/c−t). Inserting this in eq. (24), which is based on the linear approximation (21), we find E(z, t)≈  E0δ(z/c−t) (z <0), E0eiω0z(n(ω0)/c−1/vg)δ(z/vg−t) (0 < z < a ), E0eiω0a(n(ω0)/c−1/vg)δ(z/c−t−a(1/c−1/vg)) ( a < z),(25) According to eq. (25), the delta function pulse emerges from the gain region at z=a at time t=a/vg. If the group velocity is negative, the pulse emerges from th e gain region before it enters at t= 0. A sample history of the pulse propagation is illustrated in Fig. 2. Inside the negative group velocity medium, an (anti)pulse p ropagates backwards in space fromz=aat time t=a/vg<0 toz= 0 at time t= 0, at which point it appears to annihilate the incident pulse. This behavior is analogous to barrier penetration by a relat ivistic electron [12] in which an electron can emerge from the far side of the barrier earlie r than it hits the near side, if the electron emission at the far side is accompanied by posit ron emission, and the positron propagates within the barrier so as to annihilate the incide nt electron at the near side. In the Wheeler-Feynman view, this process involves only a sing le electron which propagates backwards in time when inside the barrier. In this spirit, we might say that pulses propagate backwards in time (but forward in space) inside a negative gr oup velocity medium. If a gain medium existed such that the index of refraction var ied linearly with frequency and the slope dn/dω was negative, then the advanced appearance of the sharp wave front as described by eq. (25) would constitute superluminal signal propagation. However, from Fig. 1 we see that a linear approximation to the index of refraction is reasonable in the negative group velocity medium only for |ω−ω0|<∼∆/2. The sharpest wavefront that can be supported within this bandwidth has ch aracteristic risetime τ≈1/∆. For the experiment of Wang et al. where ∆ /2π≈106Hz, an analysis based on eq. (21) would be valid only for pulses with τ>∼0.1µs. Wang et al.used a pulse with τ≈1µs, close to the minimum value for which eq. (21) is a reasonable approx imation. Since a negative group velocity can only be experienced over a limited bandwidth, very sharp wavefronts must be excluded from discussion of signal propagation. However, it is well known that the meaning of signal velocity is ambiguous unles s the waveform is sharp [5]. Hence, signal transmission in a negative group velocity med ium will always be associated with some lack of crispness. 62.4 Propagation of a Gaussian Pulse We now consider a Gaussian pulse of temporal length τcentered on frequency ω0(the carrier frequency), for which the incident waveform is E(z, t) =E0e−(z/c−t)2/2τ2eiω0z/ce−iω0t(z <0), (26) Inserting this in eq. (24) we find E(z, t) =  E0e−(z/c−t)2/2τ2eiω0(z/c−t)(z <0), E0e−(z/vg−t)2/2τ2eiω0(n(ω0)z/c−t)(0< z < a ), E0eiω0a(n(ω0)−1)/ce−(z/c−a(1/c−1/vg)−t)2/2τ2eiω0(z/c−t)(a < z).(27) The factor eiω0a(n(ω0)−1)/cin eq. (27) for a < z becomes eω2 pγa/∆2cusing eq. (11), and repre- sents a small gain due to traversing the negative group veloc ity medium. In the experiment of Wang et al. this factor was only 1.16. We have already noted in the previous section that the linear approximation to ωn(ω) is only good over a frequency interval about ω0of order ∆, and so eq. (27) for the pulse after the gain medium apply only for pulsewidths τ>∼1 ∆. (28) Further constraints on the validity of eq. (27) can obtained using the expansion of ωn(ω) to second order. For this, we repeat the derivation of eq. (27 ) in slightly more detail. The incident Gaussian pulse (26) has the Fourier decomposition Eω(z) =1 2π/integraldisplay∞ −∞dE(z, t)eiωtdt=τ√ 2πE0e−τ2(ω−ω0)2/2eiωz/c(z <0). (29) We again extrapolate the Fourier component at frequency ωinto the region z >0 using eq. (18), which yields Eω(z) =τ√ 2πE0e−τ2(ω−ω0)2/2eiωnz/c(0< z < a ). (30) We now approximate the factor ωn(ω) by its Taylor expansion through second order: ωn(ω)≈ω0n(ω0) +c vg(ω−ω0) +1 2d2(ωn) dω2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ω0(ω−ω0)2. (31) With this, we find from eq. (30) that E(z, t) =/integraldisplay∞ −∞Eω(z)e−iωtdω=E0 Ae−(z/vg−t)2/2A2τ2eiω0n(ω0)z/ce−iω0t(0< z < a ),(32) where A2(z) = 1−iz cτ2d2(ωn) dω2/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle/vextendsingle ω0. (33) 7The waveform for z > a is obtained from that for 0 < z < a by the substitutions (20) with the result E(z, t) =E0 Aeiω0a(n(ω0)−1)/ce−(z/c−a(1/c−1/vg)−t)2/2A2τ2eiω0z/ce−iω0t(a < z),(34) where Ais evaluated at z=ahere. As expected, the forms (32) and (34) revert to those of eq. (27) when d2(ωn(ω0))/dω2= 1. So long as the factor A(a) is not greatly different from unity, the pulse emerges from t he medium essentially undistorted, which occurs when a cτ≪1 24∆2 ω2 p∆ γ∆τ, (35) using eqs. (16) and (33). In the experiment of Wang et al., this condition is that a/cτ≪ 1/120, which was well satisfied with a= 6 cm and cτ= 300 m. As in the case of the delta function, the Gaussian pulse emerg es from the negative group velocity medium at time t=a vg<0. (36) In the experiment of Wang et al., the time advance of the pulse observed for z > a was a/|vg| ≈300a/c≈6×10−8s≈0.06τ. The maximum possible time advance tmaxby this technique can be estimated from eqs. (15), (35) and (36) as tmax τ≈1 12∆ γ∆τ≈1. (37) The pulse can advance by at most a few risetimes due to passage through the negative group velocity medium. While this aspect of the pulse propagation appears to be supe rluminal, it does not imply superluminal signal propagation. In accounting for signal propagation time, the time needed t o generate the signal must be included as well. A pulse with a finite frequency bandwidth ∆ takes at takes at least time τ≈1/∆ to be generated, and so is delayed by a time of order its riset imeτcompared to the case of an idealized sharp wavefront. Thus, the advance of a p ulse front in a negative group velocity medium can at most compensate for the original dela y in generating that pulse. The signal velocity, as defined by the path length between the sou rce and detector divided by the overall time from onset of signal generation to signal detec tion, remains bounded by c. As has been emphasized by Garrett and McCumber [6] and by Chia o [10, 11], the time advance of a pulse emerging from a gain medium is possible bec ause the forward tail of a smooth pulse gives advance warning of the later arrival of th e peak. The leading edge of the pulse can be amplified by the gain medium, which gives the a ppearance of superluminal pulse velocities. However, the medium is merely using infor mation stored in the early part of the pulse during its (lengthy) time of generation to bring th e apparent velocity of the pulse closer to c. The effect of the negative group velocity medium can be dramat ized in a calculation based on eqs. (27) in which the pulse width is narrower than th e gain region (in violation of 8condition (35)), as shown in Fig. 2. Here, the gain region is 0 < z < 50, the group velocity is taken to be −c/2, and cis defined to be unity. The behavior illustrated in Fig. 2 is pe rhaps less surprising when the pulse amplitude is plotted on a loga rithmic scale, as in Fig. 3. Although the overall gain of the system is unity, the leading edge of the pulse is amplified by about 70 orders of magnitude in this example (the implausi bility of which underscores that condition (35) cannot be evaded), while the trailing ed ge of the pulse is attenuated by the same amount. The gain medium has temporarily loaned some of its energy to the pulse permitting the leading edge of the pulse to appear to advance faster than the speed of light. Our discussion of the pulse has been based on a classical anal ysis of interference, but, as remarked by Dirac [13], classical optical interference d escribes the behavior of the wave functions of individual photons, not of interference betwe en photons. Therefore, we expect that the behavior discussed above will soon be demonstrated for a “pulse” consisting of a single photon with a Gaussian wave packet. 3 References [1] L.V. Hau et al.,Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas, Nature 397, 594-598 (1999). [2] K.T. McDonald, Slow light , Am. J. Phys. 68, 293-294 (2000). A figure to be compared with Fig. 1 of the present paper has been added in the version a t http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0007097 [3] This is in contrast to the “Λ” configuration of the three-l evel atomic system required for slow light [2] where the pump laser does not produce an invert ed population, in which case an adequate classical description is simply to reverse the sign of the damping constant for the pumped oscillator. [4] L.J. Wang, A. Kuzmich and A. Dogariu, Gain-assisted superluminal light propagation , Nature 406, 277-279 (2000). Their website, http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/lwan/gas.htm co ntains additional material, in- cluding an animation much like Fig. 2 of the present paper. [5] L. Brillouin, Wave Propagation and Group Velocity (Academic Press, New York, 1960). [6] C.G.B. Garrett and D.E. McCumber, Propagation of a Gaussian Light Pulse through an Anomalous Dispersion Medium , Phys. Rev. A 1, 305-313 (1970). [7] R.Y. Chiao, Superluminal (but causal) propagation of wave packets in tr ansparent media with inverted atomic populations , Phys. Rev. A 48, R34-R37 (1993). [8] E.L. Bolda, J.C. Garrison and R.Y. Chiao, Optical pulse propagation at negative group velocities due to a nearby gain line , Phys. Rev. A 49, 2938-2947 (1994). [9] A.M. Steinberg and R.Y. Chiao, Dispersionless, highly superluminal propagation in a medium with a gain doublet , Phys. Rev. A 492071-2075 (1994). 9EGain t□=□-175 EGain t□=□-150 EGain t□=□-125 EGain t□=□-100 EGain t□=□-75 EGain t□=□-50 EGain t□=□-25 EGain t□=□0 EGain t□=□25 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 25 zEGain t□=□50 Figure 2: Ten “snapshots” of a Gaussian pulse as it traverses a negative group velocity region (0 < z < 50), according to eqs. (27). The group velocity in the gain medium is vg=−c/2, and chas been set to 1. 10EGain t□=□-175 E Gaint□=□-150 E Gaint□=□-125 E Gaint□=□-100 E Gaint□=□-75 E Gaint□=□-50 E Gaint□=□-25 E Gaint□=□0 E Gaint□=□25 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 25 zE Gaint□=□50 Figure 3: The same as Fig. 2, but with the electric field plotte d on a loga- rithmic scale from 1 to 10−65. 11[10] R.Y. Chiao, Population Inversion and Superluminality , inAmazing Light , ed. by R.Y. Chiao (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996), pp. 91-108. [11] R.Y. Chiao and A.M. Steinberg, Tunneling Times and Superluminality , inProgress in Optics , Vol. 37, ed. by E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997), pp. 347 -405. [12] See p. 943 of R.P. Feynman, A Relativistic Cut-Off for Classical Electrodynamics , Phys. Rev.74, 939-946 (1948). [13] P.A.M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 4th ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1958), sec. 4. 12

arXiv:physics/0008014v1 [physics.acc-ph] 7 Aug 2000IIT-HEP-00/1 Energy Absorber R&D⋆ Daniel M. Kaplan, Edgar L. Black, Kevin W. Cassel Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616 and Mary Anne Cummings Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115 Abstract We describe the program of research and development being un dertaken by a consortium of Illinois university groups to develop liquid -hydrogen energy absorbers for muon-beam cooling. 1 Introduction Ionization cooling of a muon beam can be accomplished by pass ing the beam through energy-absorbing material and accelerating struc tures, both embed- ded within a focusing magnetic lattice. The rate of change of the normalized transverse emittance with path length is then approximatel y described by [1,2] dǫn ds=−1 β2dEµ dsǫn Eµ+1 β3β⊥(0.014 GeV)2 2EµmµLR, (1) where sis the path length, Eµthe muon energy, LRthe radiation length of the absorber medium, β=v/c, and β⊥is the betatron function of the beam (where the size of the beam is given by σx=σy=/radicalBig ǫnβ⊥/βγ). ⋆Presented at the NuFact’00 Workshop , Monterey, California, May 22–26, 2000. Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 2 February 2008In Eq. 1 we see, in addition to the dE/ds transverse cooling term, a trans- verse heating term due to multiple Coulomb scattering of the muons in the absorbers. Since cooling ceases once the heating and coolin g terms are equal, Eq. 1 implies an equilibrium emittance, which in principle ( neglecting other limiting effects) would be reached asymptotically were the c ooling channel continued indefinitely. Since the heating term is proportio nal to β⊥and in- versely proportional to the radiation length of the absorbe r medium, the goal of achieving as small an equilibrium emittance as possi ble requires us to locate the absorber only in low- β⊥regions and to use a medium with the longest possible radiation length, namely hydrogen. To ach ieve low β⊥, we want the strongest possible focusing elements. We are thus l ed to supercon- ducting solenoids filled with liquid hydrogen as possibly th e optimal solution.1 2 Cooling channel designs A variety of solenoidal focusing lattices have been conside red for muon- beam cooling, including the so-called Alternating-Soleno id, FOFO, DFOFO, SFOFO, and Single- and Double-Flip designs [3–6]. In all of t hese, liquid- hydrogen (LH 2) absorbers are used to minimize multiple scattering. The sp ec- ifications of the absorbers for some representative cases ar e given in Table 1. 3 Absorber power handling A key problem is handling the heat deposited in the hydrogen b y the muon beam. As shown in Table 1, this can exceed 100 watts per absorb er. LH 2targets have been successfully operated in such a heat-deposition r egime, notably the target for the SAMPLE experiment at Bates [9]. These high-po wer target designs have followed the approach developed at SLAC [10], i n which the liquid is pumped around an external cooling loop (see Fig. 1). The lo op includes a heat exchanger, within which the deposited heat is transfer red to a supply of cold helium gas, as well as a heater for fast regulation of tem perature. The difficulty in such designs is assuring flow of the LH 2within the absorber cell that is predominantly transverse to the beam direction, sin ce any little parcel of LH 2that flowed along the beam would be quickly heated above the bo iling point. In the SAMPLE target (Fig. 1b) transverse flow was acco mplished using a specially-designed perforated baffle, and for the proposed SLAC Experiment 1However, lithium lenses might give an even lower equilibriu m emittance than solenoids with liquid hydrogen, since stronger focusing fie lds may be feasible with liquid-lithium lenses than with magnets, and this may overc ome the radiation-length advantage of hydrogen. 2Table 1 Specifications of typical absorbers (from Ref. [5]). Lattice: Single-Flip FOFO1 FOFO2 Absorber property unit length L 30 12.6 13.2 cm density ρ 0.0708 g/cm3 radius r 20 15 10 cm volume V 38 9 4 l power P∗160 68 71 W temperature T 20†K pressure P 1 atm boiling point 20.2 K freezing point 13.8 K window material Al alloy (6061-T6) window shape ellipsoidal torispherical ellipsoidal window thickness t 300 400 200 µm ∗Assuming 5 ×1012muons/bunch at 15 Hz at 200 MeV/ c. †Operation at 1 atm will probably require a somewhat lower ope rating temperature to give more “headroom” with respect to the boiling point; th is will be iterated once the fluid-flow and thermal models have been fully calculated a nd verified in bench tests. 158 target (Fig. 1a) the use of asymmetrically-perforated s creens is under investigation [12]. We are developing a design in which tran sverse flow within the absorber cell is produced by variously-angled nozzles p laced around the periphery. In addition to the external-loop approach, we are consideri ng as an alterna- tive heat exchange internal to the absorber vessel, using dr iven convection to provide mixing and transverse flow (Fig. 2). This has the ob vious virtue of fewer moving parts. Moreover, the transverse flow arises n aturally, rather than being imposed by a clever but complicated design. The ke y question is whether there will be sufficient convection at the anticipate d power level to give the necessary rate of heat exchange via the cooling tube s at the periphery of the cell. We are addressing this by a series of computation al-fluid-dynamics (CFD) calculations that numerically solve the Navier-Stok es equation on a suitable two-dimensional2grid to evaluate the Nusselt number (the dimen- 2Given the deflection of the absorber windows (discussed belo w) a three- dimensional calculation would be preferable but is impract ical for any reasonable 3(a) Proposed SLAC E158 target with cooling loop. (b) SAMPLE target. Fig. 1. Target designs exmploying an external cooling loop. 4HeA A (a) Top view. LH2 Muon Beam HeaterHe Cooling Tubes (b) Section A-A. Fig. 2. Schematic of absorber/heat exchanger design in the c onvection approach. sionless parameter that characterizes the rate of convecti ve heat transport) vs.the Rayleigh number (the dimensionless parameter, proport ional to the power dissipation, that characterizes the degree of turbul ence). Preliminary indications are that there will be sufficient convection; thi s will be investi- gated further numerically and tested experimentally on the bench. 4 Absorber windows The thickness of the absorber windows is a critical paramete r. They must be thick enough to sustain the pressure from the LH 2, yet as thin as possible so as amount of computing resources. 5to minimize multiple scattering. The window thicknesses in Table 1 have been chosen based on the ASME standard for pressure vessels [7]. T his choice also satisfies the Fermilab safety code for liquid-hydrogen targ ets [8]. As illustrated in Fig. 3, ASME [7] specifies three standard window profiles: h emispherical, ellipsoidal, and torispherical. The minimum thickness req uired in each case is (hemispherical) t=0.5PR SE−0.1P, s =R= 0.5D (2) (ellipsoidal) t=0.5PD SE−0.1P, s = 0.25D (3) (torispherical) t=0.885PD SE−0.1P, s = 0.169D , (4) where Pis the pressure differential, Rthe radius of curvature (for hemispher- ical windows), Dthe length of the major axis (for ellipsoidal or torispheric al windows), i.e.the absorber diameter, Sthe maximum allowable stress, and Ethe weld efficiency. In the above equations we give also s, the sagitta of the window at its center, which determines which window shap es can be used for absorbers of given dimensions: since each absorber has t wo windows, the absorber length Lmust satisfy L >2s. (Note that for ellipsoidal windows the ASME code considers only the case where the length of the majo r axis is twice that of the minor axis, and for the torispherical case the rad ius of curvature of the “knuckle” is 6% that of the main cap; see Fig. 3.) The maxim um allowable stress is the smaller of (ultimate stress)/4 or (yield stres s)/1.5 [8]. In practice we find that it is the ultimate stress that is the limit. The hemispherical window shape minimizes the needed thickn ess. However, a hemispherical window is practical only for absorbers whos e length exceeds their diameter. Since our absorbers are typically wider in d iameter than they are long, we choose either the ellipsoidal or torispherical window profile. As an example, we show in Fig. 4 the mechanical design for the “FOFO 1” absorber of Table 1. Given the 15cm radius of the absorber, both hemisp herical and ellipsoidal windows are ruled out. Torispherical windows w ith 5.1cm sagitta leave just 2.4cm for the flange and manifold assembly that joi ns the two windows and connects to the hydrogen inlets and outlets. Our solution is to machine each window with an integral flange out of a single blo ck of material. The two flanges bolt together in “clamshell” fashion to form t he manifold. In the Neutrino Factory Feasibility Study [5] we consider FO FO and Single- Flip options for the cooling channel. In both designs the coo ling performance is significantly limited by scattering in the absorber windo ws. To minimize this effect we propose to operate the absorbers at 1atm pressu re.3In the 3Operation of high-power LH 2absorbers at 1 atm pressure is not an established technique, 2 atm having been used in previous high-power tar get designs [9–11]. 6hemispherical ellipsoidal torispherical Fig. 3. Comparison of ASME window shapes for given absorber d iameter. Single-Flip design the absorbers are long enough to permit t he use of 300 µm ellipsoidal windows.4In the FOFO design two cooling sections are used having two different absorber sizes. In the first (“FOFO1”) section, 400µm torispher- ical windows are used as discussed above.4By the second section, the beam has become small enough to permit a reduction in absorber dia meter, allow- ing use of 200 µm ellipsoidal windows.4The reduction in window thickness results in a lowering of the equilibrium emittance from 2.6 πto 2.2 πmm·rad and a corresponding increase in the cooling rate. We have also begun to explore the option of customizing the th ickness profile of the window in order to minimize the thickness at the center while maximiz- ing strength. An ANSYS finite-element calculation has been c arried out that shows that the stresses in a torispherical window are greate st near the edge, in the region in which the window curvature under pressure ex hibits a point of inflection (Fig. 5). By thickening the material near the ed ge one can reduce the maximum stresses substantially, allowing the material near the center to be thinner by perhaps as much as a factor of 5. Of course manufa cturability There may be safety concerns that will prevent such operatio n [13]; this is a topic for R&D. 4We assumed a weld efficiency E= 0.9 in specifying these window thicknesses, however in the integral-flange approach discussed above, E= 1, allowing 10% thin- ner windows, or alternatively, operation at 1.1 atm with the thicknesses given. 7Fig. 4. Mechanical design of FOFO1 absorber (external-cool ing-loop version). will also impose a limit on how thin the center of a machined wi ndow can be; we will explore this soon by building and testing prototypes . 5 R&D issues Beryllium or AlBeMet (a composite of 62% beryllium/38% alum inum) could reduce the impact of the windows on the cooling performance. However, based on the CEA bubble-chamber accident, beryllium is believed t o be incompati- ble with liquid hydrogen, and an R&D program will be required to establish safe design parameters for these materials. With 40% greate r strength than aluminum and 2.1 times the radiation length, AlBeMet has the potential to lower the total radiation-length fraction per absorber fro m 2.4% to 1.8% or less, depending on the detailed optimization of absorber di mensions. (While beryllium windows may also be feasible, there may be little a dditional gain in going beyond AlBeMet.) Other cooling scenarios ( e.g.SFOFO) use absorbers that are thicker compared to their diameter. Here effects of w indows on cooling 8ANSYS 5.5.1SP MAY 16 2000 10:02:57 PLOT NO. 2 DISPLACEMENT STEP=1 SUB =1 TIME=1 PowerGraphics EFACET=1 AVRES=Mat DMX =.039861 DSCA=18.815 ZV =1 DIST=8.25 XF =7.5 YF =27.819 Muon Collider Window, Deformation under Pressure Muon Collider Window, Deformation under Pressure (a) Uniform thickness. ANSYS 5.5.1SP MAY 16 2000 10:10:45 PLOT NO. 4 DISPLACEMENT STEP=1 SUB =1 TIME=1 PowerGraphics EFACET=1 AVRES=Mat DMX =.009236 DSCA=82.617 ZV =1 DIST=8.393 XF =7.63 YF =27.835 Muon Collider Window, Thick End Muon Collider Window, Thick End (b) Tapered profile. Fig. 5. Comparison of deformation and stresses vs.position under pressure for a) standard torispherical and b) tapered torispherical windo ws. (Note that the defor- mation has been exaggerated for visibility.) performance are reduced, and aluminum windows may be adequa te. Whether R&D on exotic window materials is worthwhile may thus depend on which cooling approach prevails. In all scenarios the specific power dissipation in the absorb ers is large and represents a substantial portion of the cryogenic load of th e cooling channel. Handling this heat load is a significant design challenge. An R&D program is already in place at IIT to understand the thermal and fluid- flow aspects of maintaining a constant temperature within the absorber v olume despite the large spatial and temporal variations in power density. This program is 9beginning with CFD studies and is planned to proceed to bench tests and high-power beam tests of absorber prototypes over the next y ear. In some scenarios (especially those with emittance exchang e), lithium hydride (LiH) absorbers may be called for. Since it is a solid, LiH in p rinciple can be fabricated in arbitrary shapes. In emittance-exchange cha nnels, dispersion in the lattice spatially separates muons according to their en ergies, whereupon specially shaped absorbers can be used to absorb more energy from muons of higher energy and less from those of lower energy. However, s olid LiH shapes are not commercially available, and procedures for their fa brication would need to be developed. Such an effort is challenging since LiH r eacts with water, releasing hydrogen gas and creating an explosion haz ard. 6 Acknowledgements We thank M. Boghosian of IIT who carried out the CFD calculati ons and Z. Tang of Fermilab who carried out the ANSYS window calculat ions. This work was supported in part by the U.S. Dept. of Energy, the Nat ional Science Foundation, and the IIT Research Institute. References [1] D. Neuffer, in Advanced Accelerator Concepts , F. E. Mills, ed., AIP Conf. Proc.156(American Institute of Physics, New York, 1987), p. 201. [2] R. C. Fernow and J. C. Gallardo, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1039 (1995). [3] C. Ankenbrandt et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2, 081001, 1–73 (1999). [4] D. M Kaplan, “Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory: Status an d Prospects,” IIT- HEP-99-3, FERMILAB-CONF-00-019, physics/0001037, to app ear in Nucl. Instrum. Meth. (2000). [5] N. Holtkamp et al., “A Feasibility Study of a Neutrino Source Based on a Muon Storage Ring,” FERMILAB-PUB-00-108-E (2000), submitted t o Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams. [6] V. Balbekov, E. Kim, G. Penn, et al. , various MUCOOL Notes; see http://www-mucool.fnal.gov/notes/notes.html. [7] “ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,” ANSI/ASME BPV-V III-1 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1980) , part UG-32. [8] “Guidelines for the Design, Fabrication, Testing, Inst allation and Operation of Liquid Hydrogen Targets,” Fermilab, Rev. May 20, 1997; J. Ki lmer, private communication. 10[9] E. J. Beise et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A378 (1996) 383. [10] J. W. Mark, SLAC-PUB-3169 (1984) and references therei n. [11] R. W. Carr et al., SLAC-Proposal-E-158, July 1997. [12] R. W. Carr et al. , “E158 Liquid Hydrogen Target Milestone Report,” http://www.slac.stanford.edu/exp/e158/documents/tar get.ps.gz (April 21, 1999). [13] J. Kilmer, private communication. 11

arXiv:physics/0008015 7 Aug 2000MULTIPACTORING CODE FOR 3D ACCELERATING STRUCTURES L.V.Kravchuk, G.V.Romanov, S.G.Tarasov Institute for Nuclear Research of RAS, 117312, Moscow Russia Abstract The simulation code has been developed to invest igate possible electron multipacting in the RF cavities u sing preliminary calculated field components. The code provides different options of numerical study of th e electron multipacting including search of the reson ant trajectories and simulation of an electron multipli cation. 1 INTRODUCTION The new simulation code MultP has been developed on the base of the previous one [1] to investigate an electron multipacting in RF cavities using numerically calcu lated field components. The principal advantage of the Mu ltP code is development of multipacting simulation proc edure for 3D shape of RF cavity. An easy and convenient interface along with a broad range of possibilities is considered as an importan t goal. As a whole the MultP is performed as a Windows application. The MultP provides different options of numerical study of the electron multipacting. Particularly it is possible: • to track separate electrons; • to track a group of electrons; • to scan electric field levels and initial phases of electron and to determine a possibility of resonanc e electron multipacting; • to simulate multiplication of a number of randomly distributed electrons. 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The program MultP uses 3D field map calculated by MAFIA. The files containing the field components ar e the files in standard text output format of MAFIA. The components may be calculated by other code and presented in mentioned format as well. These files are not used directly. MultP creates its own file containin g interpolations of all field solutions to derive val ues E and B at the position of particles. This file is create d once for given problem at first call of the program. During this procedure the distortions of field components near the curved surfaces, sharp edges, corners etc given by MAFIA are smoothed. Using the already pre-processed field data for subsequent runs of the program incre ases speed of calculations. The geometry of the investig ated cavity is described by the user-written parameter-l isting file.Charged particle trajectory calculations in MultP a re straightforward and involve numerical integration u p to tens thousands of particles (limited by a computer power). Independent trajectory calculations are performed f or each particle, so the code is applicable to the early st age of multipacting before space-charge effects become important or to the trajectories of separate partic les. At each integration time step the MultP checks the sta tus of the particles: are they inner or outer in respect t o the cavity walls? The inner particle remains unimpeded. The outer particle is restored to its position just bef ore entering the wall and is assigned a momentum corresponding t o that of secondary electrons and directed oppositely . If the particles can not eject secondary electron or if th e collision occurs during the decelerating phase of electromagnetic field the simulation for this parti cular particle terminates. A number of the secondary part icles is random and depends on the secondary emission coefficient. The value of initial velocity of the s econdary particle is also random inside interval selected by user. 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE OPTIONS 3.1 Tracking of the electrons For the code options demonstration purposes the 350 MHz spoke cavity is used [2]. In the code the cavit y is displayed as the views in different planes of Carte sian co- ordinate system (see Fig.1). The scaling in the vie ws is distorted to fit the windows, but the windows can b e opened outside of the main window with right ratio of the axes. Fig.1. The main window of the code. Though the code gives an opportunity to investig ate a probability of the multipacting in the most general form (simulation of multiplication of randomly distribut ed electrons), but this way is rather time consuming. The tracking of separate electrons and group of electro ns helps to grope the areas and the levels of RF field, whic h are favourable for multipacting. To define the initial position of electron one c an type its co-ordinates in the boxes or click mouse button at the positions in the views where one wants to put the p article. By default the program finds the nearest point on t he surface and positions the particle at this point. To observe a general character of electron motio n in the area of interest it is convenient to launch a group of electrons with different initial positions. One has to define a number of particles and two points on a cavity wa ll. The line will be filled with particles. After the initial velocities of electrons, the i nitial phase and the amplitude of the field are chosen in contro l boxes the trajectories are being calculated. The calculat ion of a trajectory terminates if number of collisions excee ds the predefined value or in a case of a negative phase. The collision history window contains the inform ation about the trajectories after each collision (Fig.2) . 3.2 Phase/Field diagram Tracking of a single electron or a group of electro ns can help to find suspicious points inside a cavity. The phase/field diagram gives a certain answer to the q uestion whether the resonant multiplication can exist at th e suspected point. For the point of interest one should define an inte rval of electron final energies in which the secondary-emis sion coefficient is greater than 1, the desired interval s and steps of scanning of phase and field levels. The program calculates a lot of trajectories and chooses among them the resonant ones for orders of multipacting within therange from 1 to a value, specified by the user. The result is displayed as a phase/field diagram [3] shown in Fig.3. The red regions represent the trajectories that are the closest to the resonance. To exclude the trajectori es with the energies outside the user defined range one sho uld enable energy filter control (Fig.4). 3.3 Direct simulation of multipacting Straightforward simulation of multipacting is th e most reliable way to check the existence of the multipli cation process. First of all the maximum value of the secondary emission coefficient and the interval of collision energies where this coefficient is greater than 1 are define d. During the simulation the secondary particles are launched if the incident electrons have an appropriate energy. The number of the secondary electrons is defined by the secondary emission coefficient. The initial velocit ies of the secondary electrons are randomly distributed in the interval from zero to user defined value. Fig.2. Trajectories of a group of electrons. Fig.3. Phase/field diagram. Fig.4. Phase/field diagram. Energy filter enabled. The starting electrons (number is defined by use r) are randomly distributed over all cavity or over chosen area. Their initial energies are randomly distributed in the interval defined by user and the initial phases are randomly distributed in the interval 0-120 degrees (this interval is fixed). The process is controlled with the use of windows showing the current number of particles vs number of rf cycles, phase distribution at the mome nt of collision, energy distribution at the moments of co llision (see Fig.5, Fig.6 and Fig.7). Along with these control windows the program dis plays the current position of the particles as the moving points or as trajectories lines (see Fig. 8).CONCLUSION The program “MultP” has been developed to invest igate the electron multipacting in RF cavities using prel iminary calculated field components. The main task was development of multipacting simulation procedure fo r realistic 3D shape of RF cavities. An easy and conv enient interface along with a broad range of options were considered as an important goal. The code uses MAFIA text files to generate 3D RF field map. A static magnetic field of uniform distributio n can be applied in addition to RF fields. So far the code uses the special user-written fi le to describe a cavity geometry. The geometry generator which will use MAFIA description of a cavity shape is being developed now. The authors wish to acknowledge Alexander Fesche nko for fruitful discussions and support. REFERENCES [1] L.Kravchuk et al, “The Computer Code for Investigation of Multipactor Discharge in RF Cavities”, PAC’99, p.2789, New York, 1999. [2] K.W.Shepard et al, “Prototype 350 MHz Niobium Spoke-loaded Cavity”. PAC’99, p. 955, New York, 1999. [3] V.A.Puntus, G.V.Romanov . “Multipacting in the Phase Beam Monitor at MMF”, EPAC'98, Stockholm, 1998, pp.1583-1565. Fig.5. Multiplication of the electrons in the reson ant discharge. Number of particles versus number of the cycles. Fig.6. Equilibrium phase distribution at the moment of emission in the resonant discharge. Fig.7. Equilibrium energy distribution of electrons at the moments of collision in resonant discharge. Fig.8. The electron trajectories in the non-resonan t multipaction.

arXiv:physics/0008016v1 [physics.bio-ph] 7 Aug 2000Heart Rate Variability: Measures and Models Malvin C. Teich, Steven B. Lowen, Bradley M. Jost, and Karin V ibe-Rheymer Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University 8 Saint Mary’s Street, Boston, MA 02215 and Conor Heneghan Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland 1Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Methods and Measures 6 2.1 The Heartbeat Sequence as a Point Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.1 Conventional Point Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.2 Fractal and Fractal-Rate Point Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Standard Frequency-Domain Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3 Standard Time-Domain Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.4 Other Standard Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.5 Novel Scale-Dependent Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.5.1 Allan Factor [ A(T)] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.5.2 Wavelet-Transform Standard Deviation [ σwav(m)] . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.5.3 Relationship of Wavelet [ σwav(m)] and Spectral Measures [ Sτ(f)] . . . 16 2.5.4 Detrended Fluctuation Analysis [DFA( m)] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.6 Scale-Independent Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.6.1 Detrended-Fluctuation-Analysis Power-Law Exponen t (αD) . . . . . . 18 2.6.2 Wavelet-Transform Power-Law Exponent ( αW) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.6.3 Periodogram Power-Law Exponent ( αS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.6.4 Allan-Factor Power-Law Exponent ( αA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.6.5 Rescaled-Range-Analysis Power-Law Exponent ( αR) . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.7 Estimating the Performance of a Measure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.7.1 Statistical Significance: p,d′,h, andd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 22.7.2 Positive and Negative Predictive Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.7.3 Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (ROC) Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 21 3 Discriminating Heart-Failure Patients from Normal Subje cts 22 3.1 Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.2 Selecting a Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.3 Individual Value Plots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.4 Predictive Value Plots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.5 ROC Curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.5.1 Comparison with Detection-Distance Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.5.2 ROC-Area Curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.6 Comparing the Measures for Various Data Lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.6.1 Scale-Independent vsScale-Dependent Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.6.2 Computation Times of the Various Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.6.3 Comparing the Most Effective Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.6.4 Selecting the Best Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 4 Markers for Other Cardiac Pathologies 33 5 Does Deterministic Chaos Play a Role in Heart Rate Variabil ity? 34 5.1 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 5.1.1 Phase-Space Reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 5.1.2 Removing Correlations in the Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 5.1.3 Surrogate Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 5.2 Absence of Chaos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7 36 Mathematical Models for Heart Rate Variability 38 6.1 Integrate-and-Fire Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.2 Kernel of the Integrate-and-Fire Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.2.1 Fractal Gaussian Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.2.2 Fractal Lognormal Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 6.2.3 Fractal Binomial Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 6.3 Jittered Integrate-and-Fire Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 6.3.1 Simulating the Jittered Integrate-and-Fire Point Pr ocess . . . . . . . 42 6.3.2 Statistics of the Simulated Point Process for Normal S ubjects and CHF Patients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 6.3.3 Simulated Individual Value Plots and ROC-Area Curves . . . . . . . 43 6.3.4 Limitations of the Jittered Integrate-and-Fire Mode l . . . . . . . . . 44 6.4 Toward an Improved Model of Heart Rate Variability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 7 Conclusion 46 Appendix A 48 References 49 Figure Captions 49 Tables 53 Contact Information 56 41 Introduction The human heart generates the quintessential biological si gnal: the heartbeat. A recording of the cardiac-induced skin potentials at the body’s surfac e, an electrocardiogram (ECG), reveals information about atrial and ventricular electric al activity. Abnormalities in the temporal durations of the segments between deflections, or o f the intervals between waves in the ECG, as well as their relative heights, serve to expose an d distinguish cardiac dysfunc- tion. Because the electrical activity of the human heart is i nfluenced by many physiological mechanisms, electrocardiography has become an invaluable tool for the diagnosis of a variety of pathologies that affect the cardiovascular system [1]. El ectrocardiologists have come to excel at visually interpreting the detailed form of the ECG w ave pattern and have become adept at differential diagnoses. Readily recognizable features of the ECG wave pattern are de signated by the letters P- QRS-T; the wave itself is often referred to as the QRS complex . Aside from the significance of various features of the QRS complex, the timing of the sequence of QRS complexes over tens, hundreds, and thousands of heartbeats is also signific ant. These inter-complex times are readily measured by recording the occurrences of the pea ks of the large R waves which are, perhaps, the most distinctive feature of the normal ECG . In this Chapter we focus on various measures of the fluctuatio ns of this sequence of interbeat intervals and how such fluctuations can be used to a ssess the presence or likelihood of cardiovascular disease [2]. This approach has come to be c alledheart rate variability (HRV) analysis [3, 4] even when it is the time intervals whose fluctuations are studied (heart rate has units of inverse time rather than time). HRV a nalysis serves as a marker for cardiovascular disease because cardiac dysfunction is oft en manifested by systematic changes in the variability of the RR-interval sequence relative to t hat of normal controls [1, 3, 5, 6]. A whole host of HRV measures, some scale-dependent and others scale-independent, have been developed and examined over the years in an effort to develop r eadily available, inexpensive, and noninvasive measures of cardiovascular function. We examine sixteen HRV measures and their suitability for co rrectly classifying ECG records of various lengths as normal or revealing the presen ce of cardiac dysfunction. Par- ticular attention is devoted to HRV measures that are useful for discriminating congestive- heart-failure patients from normal subjects. Using receiv er-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis we demonstrate that scale-dependent HRV measures (e.g., wavelet and spectral measures) are substantially superior to scale-independen t measures (such as wavelet and spectral fractal exponents) for discriminating these two c lasses of data over a broad range of record lengths. The wavelet-transform standard deviati on at a scale near 32 heartbeat intervals, and its spectral counterpart near 1/32 cycles/i nterval, turn out to provide reliable results using ECG records just minutes long. 5A long-standing issue of importance in cardiac physiology i s the determination of whether the normal RR sequence arises from a chaotic attractor or has an underlying stochastic origin [6]. We present a phase-space analysis in which differences between adjacent RR intervals are embedded. This has the salutary effect of removing most of the correlation in the time series, which is well-known to be deleterious to the detecti on of underlying deterministic dynamics. We demonstrate that RR sequences, from normal sub jects and from patients with cardiac dysfunction alike, have stochastic rather tha n deterministic origins, in accord with our earlier conclusions [7, 8]. Finally we develop a mathematical point process that emulat es the human heartbeat time series for both normal subjects and heart-failure pati ents. Using simulations, we show that a jittered integrate-and-fire model built around a frac tal-Gaussian-noise kernel provides a realistic, though not perfect, simulation of real heartbe at sequences. A construct of this kind may well be useful in a number of venues, including pacem aker excitation. 2 Methods and Measures 2.1 The Heartbeat Sequence as a Point Process The statistical behavior of the sequence of heartbeats can b e studied by replacing the complex waveform of an individual heartbeat recorded in the ECG (an e ntire QRS-complex) with the time of occurrence of the contraction (the time of the peak of the R phase), which is a single number [8, 9]. In mathematical terms, the heartbeat s equence is then modeled as an unmarked point process. This simplification greatly reduce s the computational complexity of the problem and permits us to use the substantial methodol ogy that exists for point processes [10, 11, 12]. The occurrence of a contraction at time tiis therefore simply represented by an impulse δ(t−ti) at that time, where δis the Dirac delta function, so that the sequence of heartbea ts is represented by h(t) =/summationdisplay iδ(t−ti). (1) A realization of a point process is specified by the set of occu rrence times {ti}of the events. A single realization of the data is often all that is availabl e to the observer so that the identification of the point process, and the elucidation of t he mechanisms that underlie it, must be gleaned from this one realization. One way in which the information in an experimental point pro cess can be made more digestible is to reduce the data into a statistic that emphas izes a particular aspect of the data (at the expense of other features). These statistics fa ll into two broad classes which 6derive from the sequence of interevent intervals and the seq uence of counts, as illustrated in Fig. 1 [10, 13]. Figure 1 illustrates how an electrocardiogram may be analyz ed to obtain the sequence of interbeat intervals as well as the sequence of counts. Fig. 1 (a) illustrates an ECG (sequence of QRS complexes) recorded from a patient. The R waves are sch ematically represented by a sequence of vertical lines, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The time b etween the first two R waves isτ1, the first RR (or interbeat) interval, as indicated by the hor izontal arrows in this figure. The time between the second and third R waves is τ2, and so forth. In Fig. 1(c), the time axis is divided into equally spaced, contiguous time window s, each of duration Tseconds, and the (integer) number of R waves that fall in the ith window is counted and denoted Ni. This sequence {Ni}forms a discrete-time random counting process of nonnegati ve integers. Varying the duration Tyields a family of sequences {Ni}(T). The RR intervals {τi}themselves also form a sequence of positive real-valued ran dom numbers, which is shown schematically in Fig. 1(d). Here the abscissa is the interva l number, which is not a simple function of time. In this section we examine several statistical measures (in cluding some that are novel) to characterize these stochastic processes; the development is assisted by an understanding of point processes. 2.1.1 Conventional Point Processes The homogeneous Poisson point process, perhaps the simples t of all stochastic point pro- cesses, is described by a single parameter, the rate λ. This point process is memoryless: the occurrence of an event at any time t0is independent of the presence (or absence) of events at other times t∝ne}a⊔ionslash=t0. Because of this property, both the intervals {τi}and counts {Ni} form sequences of independent, identically distributed ra ndom variables. The homogeneous Poisson point process is therefore completely characteriz ed by the interevent-interval distri- bution (also referred to as the interbeat-interval histogr am), which is exponential, or the event-number distribution (also referred to as the countin g distribution), which is Poisson, together with the property of being independent. This proce ss serves as a benchmark against which other point processes are measured; it therefore play s the role that the white Gaussian process enjoys in the realm of continuous-time stochastic p rocesses. A related point process is the nonparalyzable fixed-dead-ti me-modified Poisson point process, a close cousin of the homogeneous Poisson point pro cess that differs only by the imposition of a dead-time (refractory) interval after the o ccurrence of each event, during which other events are prohibited from occurring [10, 14]. A nother cousin is the gamma- r renewal process which, for integer r, is generated from an homogeneous Poisson point process by permitting every rth event to survive while deleting all intermediate events [ 10, 15]. Both 7the dead-time-modified Poisson point process and the gamma- rrenewal process require two parameters for their description. Some point processes exhibit no dependencies among their in terevent intervals at the outset, in which case the sequence of interevent intervals f orms a sequence of identically distributed random variables and the point process is compl etely specified by its interevent- interval histogram, i.e., its first-order statistic. Such a process is called a renewal process [10], a definition motivated by the replacement of failed par ts, each replacement of which forms a renewal of the point process. Both examples of point p rocesses presented above belong to the class of renewal point processes. The interevent-interval histogram is, perhaps, the most co mmonly used of all statistical measures of point processes in the life sciences. The intere vent-interval histogram estimates the interevent-interval probability density function pτ(τ) by computing the relative frequency of occurrence of interevent intervals as a function of inter val size. Its construction involves the loss of interval ordering, and therefore of information abo ut dependencies among intervals; a reordering of the sequence does not alter the interevent-i nterval histogram since the order plays no role in the relative frequency of occurrence. The interevent-interval probability density function for the homogeneous Poisson point process assumes the exponential form pτ(τ) =λexp(−λτ) (2) whereλis the mean number of events per unit time. The interevent-in terval mean and variance are readily calculated to be E[ τ] =/integraltext∞ 0τpτ(τ)dτ= 1/λand Var(τ) = E[τ2]−E2[τ] = 1/λ2, respectively, where E[ ·] represents expectation over the quantity inside the brack ets. The interevent-interval probability density function for the dead-time-modified Poisson point process exhibits the same exponential form as for the homoge neous Poisson point process, but is truncated at short interevent intervals as a result of the dead time [10]: pτ(τ) =/braceleftBigg 0 τ <τd λexp[−λ(τ−τd)]τ≥τd(3) Hereτdis the dead time and λis the rate of the process before dead time is imposed. If a process is nonrenewal, so that dependencies exist among its interevent intervals, then the interevent-interval histogram does not completel y characterize the process [13]. In this case, measures that reveal the nature of the dependenci es provide information that is complementary to that contained in the interevent-interva l histogram. The heartbeat time series is such a nonrenewal process. 82.1.2 Fractal and Fractal-Rate Point Processes The complete characterization of a stochastic process invo lves a description of all possible joint probabilities of the various events occurring in the p rocess. Different statistics provide complementary views of the process; no single statistic can in general describe a stochastic process completely. Fractal stochastic processes exhibit scaling in their statistics. Such scaling leads naturally to power-law behavior, as demonstr ated in the following. Consider a statisticw, such as the Allan factor for long counting times (see Sec. 2. 5.1), which depends continuously on the scale xover which measurements are taken [16, 17]. Suppose changin g the scale by any factor aeffectively scales the statistic by some other factor g(a), related to the factor but independent of the original scale: w(ax) =g(a)w(x). (4) The only nontrivial solution of this scaling equation, for r eal functions and arguments, that is independent of aandxis w(x) =bg(x) with g(x) =xc(5) for some constants bandc[16, 17, 18]. Thus statistics with power-law forms are close ly related to the concept of a fractal [19, 20, 21]. The particul ar case of fixed aadmits a more general solution [22]: g(x;a) =xccos[2πln(x)/ln(a)]. (6) Consider once again, for example, the interevent-interval histogram. This statistic high- lights the behavior of the times between adjacent events, bu t reveals none of the information contained in the relationships among these times, such as co rrelation between adjacent time intervals. If the interevent-interval probability densit y function follows the form of Eq. (5) so thatp(τ)∼τcover a certain range of τwherec<−1, the process is known as a fractal renewal point process [17, 19], a form of fractal stochastic process. A number of statistics may be used to describe a fractal stoch astic point process, and each statistic which scales will in general have a different s caling exponent c. Each of these exponents can be simply related to a more general parameter α, the fractal exponent, where the exact relation between these two exponents will depend u pon the statistic in question. For example, the exponent cof the interevent-interval probability density function d efined above is related to the fractal exponent αbyc=−(1 +α). As the fractal exponent is a constant that describes the overall scaling behavior of a st atistic, it does not depend on the particular scale and is therefore scale independent . Scale-independent measures are discussed in subsections 2.6 and 3.6.1. Sample functions of the fractal renewal point process are tr ue fractals; the expected value of their generalized dimensions assumes a nonintegra l value between the topological dimension (zero) and the Euclidean dimension (unity) [19]. 9The sequence of unitary events observed in many biological a nd physical systems, such as the heartbeat sequence, do not exhibit power-law-distribu ted interevent-interval histograms but nevertheless exhibit scaling in other statistics. Thes e processes therefore have integral generalized dimensions and are consequently not true fract als. They may nevertheless be endowed with rate functions that are either fractals or thei r increments: fractal Brownian motion, fractal Gaussian noise, or other related processes . Therefore, such point processes are more properly termed fractal- ratestochastic point processes [17]. It can be shown by surrogate data methods, e.g., shuffling the order of the inter vals (see Sec. 5.1.3), that it is the ordering and not the relative interval sizes that distin guish these point processes [8]. 2.2 Standard Frequency-Domain Measures A number of HRV measures have been used as standards in cardio logy, both for purposes of physiological interpretation and for clinical diagnostic applications [3]. We briefly describe some of the more commonly used measures that we include in thi s chapter for comparison with several novel measures that have been recently develop ed. Fourier transform techniques provide a method for quantify ing the correlation properties of a stochastic process through spectral analysis. Two defin itions of power spectral density have been used in the analysis of HRV [9]. A rate-based power spectral density Sλ(f) is obtained by deriving an underlying random continuous proce ssλ(t), the heart rate, based on a transformation of the observed RR interbeat intervals. The power spectral density of this random process is well defined, and standard techniques may be used for estimating the power spectral density from a single observation of λ(t). An advantage of this technique is that the power spectral density thus calculated has tempora l frequency as the independent variable, so that spectral components can be interpreted in terms of underlying physiological processes with known timescales. The power spectral densit y itself is usually expressed in units of sec−1. However, the choice of how to calculate λ(t), the underlying rate function, may influence the calculated power spectral density. The second spectral measure that is more widely used is an interval -based power spec- tral density Sτ(f) that is directly calculated from measured RR interbeat int ervals without transformation [9]. In this case the intervals are treated a s discrete-index samples of an underlying random process, and there is no intermediate cal culation of an underlying rate function. The power spectral density in this case has cycles /interval as the independent variable, and therefore has units of sec2/interval. The two types of power spectral densities are easily confuse d and care must be taken in their interpretation. For example, one could mistakenly in terpret the abscissa of an interval- based power spectral density plot as being equivalent to tem poral frequency (e.g., cycles/sec). While this is generally incorrect, for point processes whos e interevent-interval coefficient of 10variation is relatively small [9], the interval-based and r ate-based power spectral density plots can be made approximately equivalent by converting th e interval-based frequency fint (in cycles/interval) to the time-based frequency ftime(in cycles/sec) using ftime=fint/E[τ]. (7) For typical interbeat-interval sequences, the coefficient o f variation is indeed relatively small and this conversion can be carried out without the introduct ion of significant error [9]. In the remainder of this Chapter we work principally with the in terval-based power-spectral density. We use the notation f≡fintfor the interval-based frequency (cycles/interval) and retain the notation ftimefor temporal frequency (cycles/sec). We make use of a non-parametric technique for estimating the spectral density. A simple reliable method for estimating the power spectral density o f a process from a set of discrete samples {τi}is to calculate the averaged periodogram [23, 24, 25]. The da ta is first divided intoKnon-overlapping blocks of Lsamples. After the optional use of a Hanning window, the discrete Fourier transform of each block is calculated a nd squared. The results are then averaged to form the estimate /hatwiderSτ(f)≡1 KK/summationdisplay k=1|˜τk(f)|2. (8) Here ˜τk(f) is the discrete Fourier transform of the kth block of data and the hat explic- itly indicates that we are dealing with an estimate ofSτ(f), which is called an averaged periodogram. The periodogram covers a broad range of frequencies which ca n be divided into bands that are relevant to the presence of various cardiac patholo gies. The power within a band is calculated by integrating the power spectral density ove r the associated frequency range. Some commonly used measures in HRV are [3]: VLF. The power in the very-low-frequency range: 0.003–0.04 cycl es/interval. Physiological correlates of the VLF band have not been specifically identifi ed [3]. LF.The power in the low-frequency range: 0.04–0.15 cycles/int erval. The LF band may reflect both sympathetic and vagal activity but its interpre tation is controversial [3]. HF.The power in the high-frequency range: 0.15–0.4 cycles/int erval. Efferent vagal activity is a major contributor to the HF band [26, 27, 28]. LF/HF. The ratio of the low-frequency-range power to that in the hig h-frequency range. This ratio may mirror either sympatho-vagal balance or refle ct sympathetic modulations [3]. 112.3 Standard Time-Domain Measures We consider three time-domain measures commonly used in HRV analysis. The first and last are highly correlated with each other inasmuch as they e stimate the high-frequency variations in the heart rate [3]. They are: pNN50. The relative proportion of successive NNintervals (normal-to-normal intervals, i.e., all intervals between adjacent QRS complexes resulti ng from sinus node depolarizations [3]) with interval differences greater than 50ms. SDANN. TheStandard Deviation of the Average NNinterval calculated in five-minute segments. It is often calculated over a 24-hour period. This measure estimates fluctuations over frequencies smaller than 0 .003 cycles/sec. SDNN ( σint).TheStandard Deviation of the NNinterval set {τi}specified in units of seconds. This measure is one of the more venerable among th e many scale-dependent measures that have long been used for HRV analysis [3, 5, 29, 3 0]. 2.4 Other Standard Measures There are several other well-known measures that have been c onsidered for HRV analysis. For completeness, we briefly mention two of them here: the event- number histogram and the Fano factor [7, 8]. Just as the interevent-interval histogram pr ovides an estimate of the probability density function of interevent-interval magnitude, the ev ent-number histogram provides an estimate of the probability mass function of the number of ev ents. Construction of the event- number histogram, like the interevent-interval histogram , involves loss of information, in this case the ordering of the counts. However, whereas the time sc ale of information contained in the interevent-interval histogram is the mean intereven t interval, which is intrinsic to the process under consideration, the event-number histogram r eflects behavior occurring on the adjustable time scale of the counting window T. The Fano factor, which is the variance of the number of events in a specified counting time Tdivided by the mean number of events in that counting time, is a measure of correlation over differ ent time scales T. This measure is sometimes called the index of dispersion of counts [31]. I n terms of the sequence of counts illustrated in Fig. 1, the Fano factor is simply the variance of{Ni}divided by the mean of {Ni}. 122.5 Novel Scale-Dependent Measures The previous standard measures are all well-established sc ale-dependent measures. We now describe a set of recently devised scale-dependent measure s whose performance we evaluate. Throughout this chapter, when referring to intervals, we de note the fixed scale as m; when referring to time, we employ T. 2.5.1 Allan Factor [ A(T)] In this section we present a measure we first defined in 1996 [32 ] and called the Allan factor. We quickly found that this quantity was a useful measure of HR V [8]. The Allan factor is the ratio of the event-number Allan variance to twice the mea n: A(T)≡E/braceleftBig [Ni+1(T)−Ni(T)]2/bracerightBig 2E{Ni+1(T)}. (9) The Allan variance, as opposed to the ordinary variance, is d efined in terms of the variability ofsuccessive counts [17, 33, 34]. As such, it is a measure based on the Haar w avelet. The Allan variance was first introduced in connection with the st ability of atomic-based clocks [33]. Because the Allan factor functions as a derivative, it has the salutary effect of mitigating against linear nonstationarities. The Allan factor of a point process generally varies as a func tion of the counting time T; the exception is the homogeneous Poisson point process. Fo r a homogeneous Poisson point process, A(T) = 1 for any counting time T. Any deviation from unity in the value ofA(T) therefore indicates that the point process in question is n ot Poisson in nature. An excess above unity reveals that a sequence is less ordered th an a homogeneous Poisson point process, while values below unity signify sequences which a re more ordered. For a point process without overlapping events the Allan factor approa ches unity as Tapproaches zero. A more complex wavelet Allan factor can be constructed to eli minate polynomial trends [35, 36, 37]. The Allan variance, E[( Ni+1−Ni)2] may be recast as the variance of the integral of the point process under study multiplied by the following function: ψHaar(t) =  −1 for −T <t< 0, +1 for 0<t<T , 0 otherwise.(10) Equation (10) defines a scaled wavelet function, specificall y the Haar wavelet. This can be generalized to any admissible wavelet ψ(t); when suitably normalized the result is a wavelet Allan factor [36, 38]. 132.5.2 Wavelet-Transform Standard Deviation [ σwav(m)] Wavelet analysis has proved to be a useful technique for anal yzing signals at multiple scales [39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44]. It permits the time and freque ncy characteristics of a sig- nal to be simultaneously examined, and has the advantage of n aturally removing polynomial nonstationarities [36, 37, 45]. The Allan factor served in t his capacity for the counting process {Ni}, as discussed above. Wavelets similarly find use in the analy sis of RR-interval series. They are attractive because they mitigate against the nonst ationarities and slow variations inherent in the interbeat-interval sequence. These arise, in part, from the changing activity level of the subject during the course of a 24-hour period. Wavelet analysis simultaneously gives rise to both scale-d ependent and scale-independent measures [46], affording the experimenter an opportunity to compare the two approaches. In this latter capacity wavelet analysis provides an estima te of the wavelet-transform fractal (scaling) exponent αW[46, 47], as discussed in the context of HRV in subsections 2. 6.2 and 3.6.1. As a result of these salutary properties we devote particular attention to the wavelet analysis of HRV in this Chapter. A dyadic discrete wavelet transform for the RR-interval seq uence{τi}may be defined as [41, 42, 43] Wm,n(m) =1√mL−1/summationdisplay i=0τiψ(i/m−n). (11) The quantity ψis the wavelet basis function, and Lis the number of RR intervals in the set{τi}. The scale mis related to the scale index jbym= 2j. Bothjand the translation variablenare nonnegative integers. The term dyadic refers to the use o f scales that are integer powers of 2. This is an arbitrary choice; the wavelet transform could be calculated at arbitrary scale values, although the dyadic scale enjoys a n umber of convenient mathematical properties [41, 42]. The dyadic discrete wavelet transform calculated accordin g to this prescription generates a three-dimensional space from a two-dimensional signal gr aph. One axis is time or, in our case, the RR-interval number i; the second axis is the scale m; and the third axis is the strength of the wavelet component. Pictorially speakin g, the transform gives rise to a landscape whose longitude and latitude are RR-interval num ber and scale of observation, while the altitude is the value of the discrete wavelet trans form at the interval iand the scalem. Figure 2 provides an example of such a wavelet transform, whe reψ(x) is the simple Haar wavelet. Figure 2(a) illustrates the original wavelet, a fu nction that is by definition ψ(x) = 1 forxbetween 0 and 0.5; ψ(x) =−1 forxbetween 0.5 and 1; and ψ(x) = 0 elsewhere. Figure 2(b) illustrates the wavelet scaled by the factor m= 16, which causes it to last for 16 samples rather than 1; and delayed by a factor of n= 3 times the length of the wavelet, so that it 14begins atx=nm= 48. Figure 2(c) shows a sequence of interbeat-interval val ues multiplied by the scaled and shifted wavelet [the summand in Eq. (11)]. T he abscissa is labeled irather thanxto indicate that we have a discrete-time process comprised o f the sequence {τi}. In this particular example, only values of τibetweeni= 48 and 63 survive. Adding them (with the appropriate sign) provides the wavelet transform begin ning at interval number i= 48 at a scale ofm= 16. For the Haar wavelet the calculation of the wavelet transfor m is therefore tantamount to adding the eight RR intervals between intervals 48 and 55 inc lusive, and then subtracting the eight subsequent RR intervals between intervals 56 and 6 3 inclusive, as illustrated in Fig. 2(c). Moving this window across interval number allows us to see how the wavelet transform evolves with interval number, whereas varying th e scale of the window permits this variation to be observed over a range of resolutions, fr om fine to coarse (smaller scales allow the observation of more rapid variations, i.e. higher frequencies). A simple measure that can be devised from the wavelet transfo rmation is the standard deviation of the wavelet transform as a function of scale [46 , 47, 48, 49]: σwav(m) =/bracketleftBig E/braceleftBig |Wm,n(m)−E[Wm,n(m)]|2/bracerightBig/bracketrightBig1/2(12) where the expectation is taken over the process of RR interva ls, and is independent of n. It is readily shown that E[ Wm,n(m)] = 0 for all values of mso that a simplified form for the wavelet-transform standard deviation emerges: σwav(m) =/braceleftBig E/bracketleftBig |Wm,n(m)|2/bracketrightBig/bracerightBig1/2(13) This quantity has recently been shown to be quite valuable fo r HRV analysis [46, 47, 48, 49, 50]. The special case obtained by using the Haar-wavelet bas is and evaluating Eq. (13) at m= 1 yields the standard deviation of the difference between pa irs of consecutive interbeat intervals. This special case is therefore identical to the w ell-known HRV measure referred to asRMSSD [3], an abbreviation for Root-Mean-Square of Successive-interval Differences. Figure 3 provides an example in which the discrete wavelet tr ansform is calculated using an RR-interval data set. In Fig. 3(a), the original RR interb eat-interval series is shown, while Fig. 3(b) shows the dyadic discrete wavelet transform at three different scales as a function of RR-interval number. It is important and interes ting to note that the trends and baseline variations present in the original time series hav e been removed by the transform. As illustrated in Fig. 3(b), the wavelet-transform standar d deviation σwavtypically increases with the scale m. When plotted versus scale, this quantity provides informa tion about the behavior of the signal at all scales. In Sec. 3 we show how this measure can be effectively used to separate heart-failure patients from normal normal subjects. 152.5.3 Relationship of Wavelet [ σwav(m)] and Spectral Measures [ Sτ(f)] Is there a spectral measure equivalent to the wavelet-trans form standard deviation? We proceed to show that the wavelet-transform standard deviat ionσwav(m) and the interval- based power spectral density Sτ(f) are isomorphic [49], so that the answer is yes under conditions of stationarity. Though their equivalence is mo st easily analyzed in the continuous domain, the results are readily translated to the discrete d omain by interpreting the discrete wavelet transform as a discretized version of a continuous w avelet transform. The continuous wavelet transform of a signal τ(t) is defined as Wτ(s,r) =1√s/integraldisplay∞ −∞τ(t)ψ∗/parenleftbiggt−r s/parenrightbigg dt (14) wheresandrare continuous-valued scale and translation parameters re spectively, ψis a wavelet basis function, and ∗denotes complex conjugation. Since E[ Wτ] = 0, the variance ofWτat scalesis D(s) =σ2 wav(s) = E/bracketleftBig |Wτ(s,r)|2/bracketrightBig , (15) which can be written explicitly as D(s) = E/bracketleftBigg1√s/integraldisplay∞ −∞τ(t)ψ∗/parenleftbiggt−r s/parenrightbigg dt1√s/integraldisplay∞ −∞τ∗(t′)ψ/parenleftBiggt′−r s/parenrightBigg dt′/bracketrightBigg . (16) For a wide-sense stationary signal the variance can be writt en as D(s) =1 s/integraldisplay∞ −∞/integraldisplay∞ −∞R(t−t′)ψ∗/parenleftbiggt−r s/parenrightbigg ψ/parenleftBiggt′−r s/parenrightBigg dtdt′(17) whereRis the autocorrelation function of τ. Routine algebraic manipulation then leads to D(s) =s/integraldisplay∞ −∞R(sy)Wψ(1,y)dy (18) or, alternatively, D(s) =s/integraldisplay∞ f=−∞Sτ(f)/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay∞ y=−∞Wψ(1,y) exp(j2πfsy)dy/bracketrightbigg df (19) whereWψ(1,y) is the wavelet transform of the wavelet itself (termed the w avelet kernel), andSτ(f) is the power spectral density of the signal. For the dyadic discrete wavelet transform that we have used, Eq. (19) becomes D(m) =σ2 wav(m) =m/integraldisplay∞ f=−∞Sτ(f)/bracketleftbigg/integraldisplay∞ y=−∞Wψ(1,y) exp(j2πfmy )dy/bracketrightbigg df =m/integraldisplay∞ −∞Sτ(f)H(mf)df. (20) 16We conclude that for stationary signals the interval-based power spectral density Sτ(f) is directly related to the wavelet-transform standard deviat ionσwav(m) through an integral transform. This important result has a simple interpretati on: the factor in square brackets in Eq. (20) represents a bandpass filter H(mf) that only passes spectral components in a bandwidth surrounding the frequency fmthat corresponds to the scale m. This is because the Fourier transform of a wavelet kernel is constrained to be ba ndpass in nature. For a discrete- index sequence, the sampling “time” can be arbitrarily set t o unity so that a frequency fm corresponds to 1 /m. We conclude that information obtained from a D(m)-based statistic is also accessible through interval-based power spectral den sity measures. In Sec. 3 we explicitly show that the two measures are comparable in their abilities to discriminate heart-failure patients from normal subjects. 2.5.4 Detrended Fluctuation Analysis [DFA( m)] Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) was originally propos ed as a technique for quantifying the nature of long-range correlations in a time series [51, 5 2, 53]. As implied by its name, it was conceived as a method for detrending variability in a s equence of events. The DFA computation involves the calculation of the summed series y(k) =k/summationdisplay i=1{τi−E[τ]} (21) wherey(k) is thekth value of the summed series and E[ τ] denotes the average over the set {τi}. The summed series is then divided into segments of length mand a least-squares fit is performed on each of the data segments, providing the trends for the individual segments. Detrending is carried out by subtracting the local trend ym(k) in each segment. The root- mean-square fluctuation of the resulting series is then F(m) =/braceleftBigg1 LL/summationdisplay k=1[y(k)−ym(k)]2/bracerightBigg1/2 . (22) The functional dependence of F(m) is obtained by evaluations over all segment sizes m. Although detrended fluctuation analysis was originally pro posed as a method for esti- mating the scale-independent fractal exponent of a time ser ies [51], as discussed in Sec. 2.6.1, we consider its merits as a scale- dependent measure. As will be demonstrated in Sec. 3, a plot ofF(m) versusmreveals a window of separation between congestive-heart-f ailure pa- tients and normal subjects over a limited range of scales, mu ch as that provided by the other scale-dependent measures discussed in this section. Becau se DFA is an ad hoc measure that involves nonlinear computations it is difficult to relate it t o other scale-dependent measures in the spirit of Eq. (20). Furthermore, as will become clear i n Sec. 3.6.2, relative to other measures DFA is highly time intensive from a computational p oint-of-view. 172.6 Scale-Independent Measures Scale-independent measures are designed to estimate fract al exponents that characterize scaling behavior in one or more statistics of a sequence of ev ents, as discussed in Sec. 2.1.2. The canonical example of a scale-independent measure in HRV is the fractal exponent αSof the interbeat-interval power spectrum, associated with th e decreasing power-law form of the spectrum at sufficiently low frequencies f:Sτ(f)∝f−αS[3, 30, 54]. Other scale-independent measures have been examined by us [7, 8, 16, 17, 46] and by othe rs [51, 55, 56, 6] in connection with HRV analysis. For exponent values encountered in HRV, a nd infinite data length, all measures should in principle lead to a unique fractal expone nt. In practice, however, finite data length and other factors introduce bias and variance, s o that different measures give rise to different results. The performance of scale-indepen dent measures has been compared with that of scale-dependent measures for assessing cardia c dysfunction [46, 47]. 2.6.1 Detrended-Fluctuation-Analysis Power-Law Exponen t (αD) The DFA technique, and its use as a scale-dependent measure, has been described in Sec. 2.5.4. A number of recent studies [51, 53, 56] have consi dered the extraction of power- law exponents from DFA and their use in HRV. As originally pro posed [51], log[ F(m)] is plotted against log( m) and scaling exponents are obtained by fitting straight line s to sections of the resulting curve – the exponents are simply the slopes o f the linearly fitted segments on this doubly logarithmic plot. The relationship between t he scaling exponents has been proposed as a means of differentiating normal from pathologi cal subjects [51, 55, 56]. 2.6.2 Wavelet-Transform Power-Law Exponent ( αW) The use of the wavelet transform as a scale-dependent measur e was considered in Sec. 2.5.2. It was pointed out that a scale-independent measure also eme rges from the wavelet-transform standard deviation. The wavelet-transform fractal expone ntαWis estimated directly from the wavelet transform as twice the slope of the curve log[ σwav(m)] versus log( m), measured at large values of m[46]. The factor of two is present because the fractal expone nt is related to variance rather than to standard deviation. 2.6.3 Periodogram Power-Law Exponent ( αS) The description of the periodogram as a scale-dependent mea sure was provided in Sec. 2.2. The periodogram fractal exponent αS[17, 54] is obtained as the least-squares-fit slope of the spectrum when plotted on doubly logarithmic coordinate s. The range of low frequencies 18over which the slope is estimated stretches between 10 /Land 100/LwhereLis the length of the data set [17]. 2.6.4 Allan-Factor Power-Law Exponent ( αA) The use of the Allan factor as a scale-dependent measure was c onsidered in Sec. 2.5.1. The Allan factor fractal exponent αA[8, 17] is obtained by determining the slope of the best- fitting straight line, at large values of T, to the Allan factor curve [Eq. (9)] plotted on doubly logarithmic coordinates. Estimates of αobtained from the Allan factor can range up to a value of three [32]. The use of wavelets more complex than the Haar enables an increased range of fractal exponents to be accessed, at the cost of a red uction in the range of counting time over which the wavelet Allan factor varies as TαA. In general, for a particular wavelet with regularity (number of vanishing moments) R, fractal exponents α <2R+ 1 can be reliably estimated [36, 38]. For the Haar basis, R= 1 whereas all other wavelet bases have R>1. A wavelet Allan factor making use of bases other than the Ha ar is therefore required for fractal-rate stochastic point processes for which α≥3. For processes with α <3, however, the Allan factor appears to be the best choice [36, 3 8]. 2.6.5 Rescaled-Range-Analysis Power-Law Exponent ( αR) Rescaled range analysis [19, 57, 58, 59], provides informat ion about correlations among blocks of interevent intervals. For a block of kinterevent intervals, the difference between each interval and the mean interevent interval is obtained and su ccessively added to a cumulative sum. The normalized range R(k) is the difference between the maximum and minimum values that the cumulative sum attains, divided by the stand ard deviation of the interval size.R(k) is plotted against k. Information about the nature and the degree of correlation in the process is obtained by fitting R(k) to the function kH, whereHis the so-called Hurst exponent [57]. For H >0.5 positive correlation exists among the intervals, whereas H <0.5 indicates the presence of negative correlation; H= 0.5 obtains for intervals with no correlation. Renewal processes yield H= 0.5. For negatively correlated intervals, an interval that is larger than the mean tends, on average, to be preceded or followed by one smaller than the mean. The Hurst exponent His generally assumed to be well suited to processes that exhi bit long-term correlation or have a large variance [19, 57, 58, 5 9], but there are limits to its robustness since it exhibits large systematic errors and hi ghly variable estimates for some fractal sequences [6, 60, 61]. Nevertheless, it provides a u seful indication of correlation in a sequence of events arising from the ordering of the intereve nt intervals alone. The exponent αRis ambiguously related to the Hurst exponent H, since some authors 19have used the quantity Hto index fractal Gaussian noise whereas others have used the same value ofHto index the integral of fractal Gaussian noise (which is fra ctional Brownian motion). The relationship between the quantities is αR= 2H−1 for fractal Gaussian noise andαR= 2H+ 1 for fractal Brownian motion. In the context of this work, t he former relationship holds. 2.7 Estimating the Performance of a Measure We have, to this point, outlined a variety of candidate measu res for use in HRV analysis. The task now is to determine the relative value of these measu res from a clinical perspective. We achieve this by turning to estimation theory [62]. A statistical measure obtained from a finite set of actual dat a is characterized by an estimator. The fidelity with which the estimator can approxi mate the true value of the measure is determined by its bias and variance. The bias is th e deviation of the expected value of the estimator from its true underlying value (assum ing that this exists) whereas the variance indicates the expected deviation from the the mean . An ideal estimator has zero bias and zero variance, but this is not achievable with a finit e set of data. For any unbiased estimator the Cram´ er-Rao bound provides a lower bound for t he estimator variance; measures that achieve the Cram´ er-Rao bound are called efficient estim ators. The estimator bias and variance play a role in establishing the overall statistica l significance of conclusions based on the value returned by the estimator. 2.7.1 Statistical Significance: p,d′,h, and d The concept of statistical significance extends the basic pr operties of bias and variance [63]. It provides a probabilistic interpretation of how likely it is that a particular value of the estimator might occur by chance alone, arising from both ran dom fluctuations in the data and the inherent properties of the estimator itself. A frequently used standard of statistical significance is th ep-value, the calculation of which almost always implicitly assumes a Gaussian-distrib uted dependent variable. A lower p-value indicates greater statistical significance, and a me asure is said to be statistically significant to a value of p0whenp<p 0. The distributions obtained from HRV measurements are generally not Gaussian, however, so that the usual metho d for estimating the p-value cannot be used with confidence. Since other methods for estim ating thep-value require more data than is available we do not consider this quantity furth er. Another often-used distribution-dependent standard is th ed′-value. It serves to indicate the degree of separation between two distributions, and has been widely used in signal 20detection theory and psychophysics where the two distribut ions represent noise and signal- plus-noise [64]. The most common definition of d′is the difference in the means of two Gaussian distributions divided by their common standard de viation. Two closely related distribution-dependent cousins of d′are the detection distance h, defined as the difference in the means of the two Gaussian distributions divided by the square-root of the sum of their variances; and the detection distance d, defined as the difference in the means of the two Gaussian distributions divided by the sum of their stand ard deviations. Larger values ofd′,h, anddindicate improved separation between the two distribution s and therefore reduced error in assigning an outcome to one or the other of th e hypotheses. Because HRV measures are intended to provide diagnostic inf ormation in a clinical setting, and do not return Gaussian statistics, the evaluat ion of their performance using distribution-independent means is preferred. Two techniq ues for achieving this, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operator charact eristic (ROC) analysis, are described below. Neither requires knowledge of the statistical distr ibution of the measured quantities and both are useful. 2.7.2 Positive and Negative Predictive Values The performance of the various HRV measures discussed previ ously can be effectively com- pared using positive predictive values and negative predic tive values, the proportion of cor- rect positive and negative identifications respectively. W hen there is no false positive (or negative) detection, the predictive value is equal to unity and there is perfect assignment. Furthermore, when the individual values of a measure for nor mal subjects and patients do not overlap, the predictive value curves are typically mono tonic, either increasing or decreas- ing, with the threshold. A detailed discussion of positive a nd negative predictive values is provided in Sec. 3.4. 2.7.3 Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (ROC) Analysis Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis [62, 6 4, 65] is an objective and highly effec- tive technique for assessing the performance of a measure wh en it is used in binary hypothesis testing. This format provides that a data sample be assigned to one of two hypotheses or classes (e.g., pathologic or normal) depending on the value of some measured statistic relative to a threshold value. The efficacy of a measure is then judged on the basis of its sensitivity (the proportion of pathologic patients correctly identifie d) and its specificity (the propor- tion of normal subjects correctly identified). The ROC curve is a graphical presentation of sensitivity versus 1 −specificity as a threshold parameter is swept. Note that sens itivity and specificity relate to the status of the patients (pathologic and normal) whereas predictive values relate to the status of the identifications (positive and negative). 21The area under the ROC curve serves as a well-established ind ex of diagnostic accuracy [64, 65]; the maximum value of 1.0 corresponds to perfect ass ignment (unity sensitivity for all values of specificity) whereas a value of 0.5 arises from a ssignment to a class by pure chance (areas <0.5 arise when the sense of comparison is reversed). ROC analys is can be used to choose the best of a host of different candidate diagno stic measures by comparing their ROC areas, or to establish for a single measure the trad eoff between data length and misidentifications (misses and false positives) by examini ng ROC area as a function of record length. A minimum record length can then be specified to achie ve acceptable classification accuracy. As pointed out above, ROC analysis relies on no implicit assu mptions about the statistical nature of the data set [62, 65], so that it is generally more su itable [47] for analyzing non- Gaussian time series than are measures of statistical signi ficance such as p-value,h, andd. Another important feature of ROC curves is that they are inse nsitive to the units employed (e.g., spectral magnitude, magnitude squared, or log magni tude); ROC curves for a measure Mare identical to those for any monotonic transformation the reof such as Mxor log(M). In contrast the values of d′,h, anddare generally modified by such transformations, as will be demonstrated in Sec. 3.5.1. 3 Discriminating Heart-Failure Patients from Normal Subjects We now proceed to examine the relative merits of various HRV m easures for discriminating congestive-heart-failure (CHF) patients from normal subj ects. Specifically we contrast and compare the performance of the 16 measures set forth in Sec. 2 : VLF, LF, HF, LF/HF, pNN50, SDANN, SDNN ( σint),A(T),σwav(m),Sτ(f), DFA(m),αD,αW,αS,αA, andαR. After discussing the selection of an appropriate scale m, we use predictive value plots and ROC curves to select a particular subset of HRV markers th at appears to be promising for discerning the presence of heart failure in a patient pop ulation. 3.1 Database The RR recordings analyzed in this section were drawn from th e Beth-Israel Hospital (Boston, MA) Heart-Failure Database which includes 12 records from n ormal subjects (age 29–64 years, mean 44 years) and 12 records from severe congestive- heart-failure patients (age 22– 71 years, mean 56 years). The recordings were made with a Holt er monitor digitized at a fixed value of 250 samples/sec. Also included in this databas e are 3 RR records for CHF pa- 22tients who also suffered from atrial fibrillation (AF); these records are analyzed as a separate class. All records contain both diurnal and nocturnal segme nts. The data were originally provided to us in 1992 by D. Rigney and A. L. Goldberger. A detailed characterization of each of the records is presen ted in Table 1 of Ref. [8]; some statistical details are provided in Table A1. Of the 27 recor dings, the shortest contained Lmax= 75821 RR intervals; the remaining 26 recordings were trunc ated to this length before calculating the 16 HRV measures. 3.2 Selecting a Scale A value for the scale mthat suitably discriminates heart-failure patients from n ormal subjects can be inferred from our recent wavelet studies of the CHF and normal records from the same database as discussed in Sec. 3.1 [46, 47]. With the help of the wavelet-transform standard deviation σwav(m) discussed in detail in Sec. 2.5.2, we discovered a critical scale window near m= 32 interbeat intervals over which the normal subjects exhi bited greater fluctuations than those afflicted with heart failure. For thes e particular long data sets, we found that it was possible to perfectly discriminate betwee n the two groups [46, 47, 48]. The results are displayed in Fig. 4, where σwav(m) is plotted vs. wavelet scale mfor the 12 normal subjects (+), the 12 CHF patients ¯ s atrial fibrilla tion (×), and the 3 CHF patients ¯ c atrial fibrillation ( △), using Haar-wavelet analysis. The AF patients ( △) typically fell near the high end of the non-AF patients ( ×), indicating greater RR fluctuations, particularly at small scales. This results from the presence of non-sinus be ats. Nevertheless it is evident from Fig. 4 that the wavelet measure σwavserves to completely separate the normal subjects from the heart-failure patients (both ¯ s and ¯ c AF) at scales of 16 and 32 heartbeat intervals, as reported in Ref. [46]. One can do no better. This conclusio n persists for a broad range of analyzing wavelets, from Daubechies 2-tap (Haar) to Daub echies 20-tap [46]. The importance of this scale window has been recently confirm ed in an Israeli-Danish study of diabetic patients who had not yet developed clinica l signs of cardiovascular disease [50]. The reduction in the value of the wavelet-transform st andard deviation σwav(32) that leads to the scale window occurs not only for CHF (¯ s and ¯ c AF) and diabetic patients, but also for heart-transplant patients [48, 50], and also in records preceding sudden cardiac death [46, 48]. The depression of σwav(32) at these scales is likely associated with the im- pairment of autonomic nervous system function. Baroreflex m odulations of the sympathetic or parasympathetic tone typically lie in the range 0.04–0.0 9 cycles/sec (11–25 sec), which corresponds to the scale where σwav(m) is reduced. These studies, in conjunction with our earlier investigati ons which revealed a similar critical scale window in the counting statistics of the heartbeat [8, 35] (as opposed to the 23time-interval statistics under discussion), lead to the recognition that scales in the vicinity ofm= 32 enjoy a special status. Those measures that depend on a pa rticular scale are therefore evaluated at m= 32 andf= 1/32 in the expectation that these values maximize discriminability in the more usual situation when the two cl asses of data cannot be fully separated. 3.3 Individual Value Plots Having devised a suitable scale value mwe now proceed to evaluate the 16 measures for all 27 normal and CHF data sets, each comprising 75821 RR inte rvals. The results are presented in Fig. 5 where each of the 16 panels represents a di fferent measure. For each measure the individual values for normal subjects (+), CHF p atients ¯ s AF ( ×), and CHF patients ¯ c AF ( △) comprise the left three columns, respectively. Values in t he right four columns correspond to other cardiovascular pathologies an d will be discussed in Sec. 4. To illustrate how particular measures succeed (or fail to su cceed) in distinguishing be- tween CHF patients and normal subjects, we focus in detail on two measures: VLF power and pNN50. For this particular collection of patients and re cord lengths, the normal sub- jects all exhibit larger values of VLF power than do the CHF pa tients; indeed a horizontal line drawn at VLF= 0 .000600 completely separates the two classes. On the other ha nd for pNN50, though the normals still have larger values on averag e, there is a region of overlap of CHF patients and normal subjects near 0.05, indicating th at the two classes of patients cannot be entirely separated using this measure. Thus for th e full data set, comprising 75821 RR intervals, VLF succeeds in completely distinguishing CH F patients and normal subjects whereas pNN50 does not. Examining all 16 panels, we find that six measures manage to co mpletely separate the normal subjects (first column) from the heart-failure patie nts (second and third columns) while the remaining 10 fail to do so. The six successful measu res are highlighted by boldface font in Fig. 5: VLF,LF,A(10),σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), andDFA(32) . 3.4 Predictive Value Plots How can the ability of a measure to separate two classes of sub jects be quantified? Returning to the VLF panel in Fig. 5 we place a threshold level θat an arbitrary position on the ordinate, and consider only the leftmost two columns: norma l subjects and heart-failure patients who do not suffer from atrial fibrillation. We then cl assify all subjects for whom the VLF values are <θas CHF patients (positive) and those for whom the VLF values >θ as normal (negative). (Measures that yield smaller results for normal patients, on average, 24obey a reversed decision criterion.) If a subject labeled as a CHF patient is indeed so afflicted, the n this situation is referred to as a true positive ( PT); a normal subject erroneously labeled as a CHF patient is re ferred to as a false positive ( PF). We define negative outcomes that are true ( NT) and false ( NF) in an analogous manner. As pointed out in Sec. 2.7.2, the posi tive predictive value VP= PT/(PT+PF) and negative predictive value VN=NT/(NT+NF) represent the proportion of positives and negatives, respectively, that are correct ly identified. This determination is carried out for many values of the threshold θ. Figure 6 shows the positive (solid curves) and negative (dot ted curves) predictive values for all 16 measures, plotted against the threshold θ, each in its own panel. These curves are constructed using the 12 normal and 12 heart-failure (¯ s AF) records that comprise the CHF database discussed in Sec. 3.1. For the VLF measure, both predictive values are simulataneously unity in the immediate vicinity of θ= 0.000600. This occurs because PF andNFare both zero at this particular value of θand reconfirms that the two classes of data separate perfectly in the VLF panel of Fig. 5 at this thre shold. For threshold values outside the range 0 .000544< θ < 0.000603, some of the patients will be incorrectly identified by the VLF measure. If we set θ= 0.000100, for example, six of the twelve CHF patients will be incorrectly identified as nor mal subjects, which is confirmed by examining the VLF panel in Fig. 5. This yields VN=NT/(NT+NF) = 12/(12 + 6).= 0.67<1, which is the magnitude of the negative predictive value (d otted curve) in the VLF panel in Fig. 6. At this value of the threshold ( θ= 0.000100) the positive predictive value remains unity because PFremains zero. The pNN50 panel in Fig. 5, in contrast, reveals a range of over lap in the individual values of the normal subjects and CHF patients. Consequentl y asθincreases into the overlap region, VPdecreases below unity and this happens before VNattains unity value. Thus there is no threshold value, or range of threshold value s, for which the positive and negative predictive values in Fig. 6 are both unity. The best threshold for this measure lies in the range 0 .026< θ < 0.050, with the choice depending on the relative benefit of bein g able to accurately predict the presence or absence of CHF in a patient. There are six measures in Fig. 6 (indicated in boldface font) for which the positive and negative predictive values are both unity over the same rang e of threshold values. These measures are, of course, the same six measures for which the n ormal subjects and heart- failure patients fall into disjoint sets in Fig. 5. 253.5 ROC Curves Two other important clinically relevant quantities that de pend on the threshold θare the sensitivity, the proportion of heart-failure patients tha t are properly identified [ PT/(PT+ NF)]; and the specificity, the proportion of normal subjects th at are properly identified [NT/(NT+PF)]. As pointed out in subsections 2.7.2 and 2.7.3, sensitivi ty and specificity relate to patient status (pathologic and normal, respectiv ely) whereas the positive and neg- ative predictive values relate to identification status (po sitive and negative, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity are both monotonic functions of the threshold, but this is not generally true for the predictive values. The monotonicity property is salutary in that it facilitates the use of a parametric plot which permits these quantities to be represented in compact form. A plot of sensitivity versus 1 −specificity, traced out using various values of the threshold θ, forms the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curv e (see Sec. 2.7.3). ROC curves are presented in Fig. 7 for all 16 measures, again u sing the same 12 normal and 12 heart-failure (¯ s AF) records that comprise the CHF da tabase discussed in Sec. 3.1. Because of the complete separation between the two classes o f patients (leftmost two columns of the VLF panel in Fig. 5) near θ= 0.000600, the VLF ROC curve in Fig. 7 simultaneously achieves unity (100%) sensitivity and unity (100%) specific ity (the point at upper left corner of the ROC curve). For the pNN50 statistic, in contrast, the o verlap evident in Fig. 5 prevents this, so that the upper left corner of the pNN50 ROC c urve in Fig. 7 instead reveals smaller simultaneous values of sensitivity and specificity . Six measures in Fig. 7 simultaneously exhibit unity sensiti vity and specificity; these are indicated by boldface font and have ROC curves that are perfe ctly square. They are clearly the same measures for which the normal subjects and heart-fa ilure patients fall into disjoint sets in Fig. 5, and for which simultaneous positive and negat ive predictive values of unity are observed in Fig. 6. 3.5.1 Comparison with Detection-Distance Measures For didactic purposes we compare the ROC results presented i mmediately above with those obtained using detection-distance analysis. As we indicat ed in Sec. 2.7.1, care must be exer- cised when using these techniques for anything other than Ga ussian-distributed quantities. The calculations were carried out using the same 12 normal-s ubject and 12 CHF-patient records, each comprising Lmax= 75821 intervals. In Table 1 we provide the detection dis- tanceshandd, in order of descending value of h, for all 16 measures. Large values are best since they indicate that the two distributions are well sepa rated. Five of the six measures that entirely separate the CHF patie nts and normal subjects using ROC analysis fall in the top five positions in Table 1. Th e sixth measure, LF, falls in 26ninth position. This confirms that detection-distance anal ysis applied to these long record- ings provides results that qualitatively agree with those o btained using ROC analysis. How- ever, detection-distance analysis does not provide any ind ication of how many (or indeed whether any) of the measures at the top of the list completely separate the two classes of patients, nor does it provide estimates of sensitivity and s pecificity. Moreover, the rankings according to ddiffer from those according to h. Finally, the detection-distance for a particular measure, as well as the relative ranking of that measure, depends on what appear to be insignificant de tails about the specific form in which the measure is cast. For example the hvalues forσwav(32) and its square σ2 wav(32) are substantially different, and so are their rankings in Tab le 1. As discussed in Sec. 2.7.3, ROC analysis is invariant to monotonic transformations of t he measure and therefore does not suffer from this disadvantage. 3.5.2 ROC-Area Curves Perfectly square ROC curves, associated with the group of si x boldface-labeled measures in Figs. 5–8, exhibit unity area. These ROCs represent 100% s ensitivity for all values of specificity, indicating that every patient is properly assi gned to the appropriate status: heart- failure or normal. Though the perfect separation achieved b y these six measures endorses them as useful diagnostic statistics, the results of most st udies are seldom so clear-cut. ROC area will surely decrease as increasing numbers of out-of-s ample records are added to the database, since increased population size means increased variability [46]. ROC area also decreases with diminishing data length; short er records yield less informa- tion about patient condition and these patients are therefo re more likely to be misclassified [47, 48]. The ROC curves in Fig. 7 have been constructed from H olter-monitor records that contain many hours of data (75821 RR intervals). It would be u seful in a clinical setting to be able to draw inferences from HRV measures recorded over shorter times, say minutes rather than hours. It is therefore important to examine the p erformance of the 16 HRV measures as data length is decreased. As indicated in Sec. 2. 7.3, ROC-analysis provides an ideal method for carrying out this task [47, 48]. In Fig. 8 we present ROC-area curves as a function of the numbe r of RR intervals (data length)Lanalyzed (64 ≤L≤75821). The ROC areas for the full-length records ( Lmax= 75821), which correspond to the areas under the ROC curves pr esented in Fig. 7, are the rightmost points in the ROC-area curves shown in Fig. 8. Resu lts for shorter records were obtained by dividing the 12 normal and 12 heart-failure (¯ s A F) records that comprise the CHF database (Sec. 3.1) into smaller segments of length L. The area under the ROC curve for that data length Lwas computed for the first such segment for all 16 measures, an d then for the second segment, and so on, for all segments of length L(remainders of length <Lof 27the original files were not used for the ROC-area calculation s). ¿From the Lmax/Lvalues of the ROC area, the mean and standard deviation were computed a nd plotted in Fig. 8. The lengthsLexamined ranged from L= 26= 64 toL= 216= 65536 RR intervals, in powers of two, in addition to the entire record of Lmax= 75821 intervals. To illustrate the information provided by these curves, we d irect our attention to the VLF and pNN50 panels in Fig. 8. For the full-length records th e right-most point in the VLF panel reveals unity area while that for pNN50 lies somewh at lower, as expected from the corresponding ROC curves in Fig. 7. VLF clearly outperfo rms pNN50. As the data length analyzed decreases, so too do the ROC areas for both me asures while their variances increase, also as expected. However, when the data length di ps to 256 or fewer RR intervals, the performance of the two measures reverses so that pNN50 ou tperforms VLF. There is an important point to be drawn from this example. Not only does t he performance of a measure depend on data length, but so too does the relative performan ce of different measures. 3.6 Comparing the Measures for Various Data Lengths Based on their overall ability to distinguish between CHF pa tients and normal subjects over a range of data lengths, the sixteen measures shown in Fig. 8 d ivide roughly into three classes. The six measures that fall in the first class, compri sing VLF, LF, A(10),σwav(32), Sτ(1/32), and DFA(32), succeed in completely separating the two c lasses of patients for data lengths down to L= 215= 32768 RR intervals. These six measures share a dependence o n a single scale, or small range of scales, near 32 heartbeat int ervals. For this collection of data sets, this scale appears to yield the best performance. Memb ers of this class outperform the other ten measures at nearly all data lengths. Apparently th e scale value itself is far more important than the measure used to evaluate it. The second class, consisting of HF, the ratio LF /HF, pNN50, and σint, fail to achieve complete separation for any data size examined. Neverthele ss the members of this class are not devoid of value in separating CHF patients from normal su bjects. Interestingly, all but LF/HF provide better results than A(10), a member of the first class, for the shortest data lengths. Results for these four measures varied relatively little with data size, thus exhibiting a form of robustness. Members of the third class, consisting of SDANN and the five sc ale-independent measures α[·], exhibit poor performance at all data lengths. These six mea sures require long sequences of RR intervals to make available the long-term fluctuations required for accurate estimation of the fractal exponent. Data lengths L <5000 RR intervals lead to large variance and (negative) bias, and are not likely to be meaningful. As an ex ample of the kind of peculiarity that can emerge when attempting to apply scale-independent measures to short records, the αAROC area decreases below 0.5 when the data size falls below 20 48 intervals (reversing 28the sense of the comparison only for these data sizes increas es the ROC area, though not above 0.7; however this clearly violates the spirit of the me thod). SDANN requires several 5-minute segments to accurately determine the standard dev iation. 3.6.1 Scale-Independent vsScale-Dependent Measures As indicated in the previous subsection, all five scale-inde pendent measures ( αD,αW,αS, αA, andαR) perform poorly at all data lengths. These fractal-exponen t estimators return widely differing results as is plainly evident in Fig. 5. This suggests that there is little merit in the concept of a single exponent for characterizing the hu man heartbeat sequence, no less a “universal” one as some have proposed [51, 55, 56]. A variation on this theme is the possibility that pairs of fra ctal exponents can provide a useful HRV measure. At small scales m, Fig. 4 reveals that heart-failure patients exhibit smaller values of the wavelet-transform standard-deviati on slope than do normal subjects. Following Peng et al. [51], who constructed a measure based on differences of DFA sc aling exponents in different scaling regions in an attempt to discr iminate CHF patients from normal subjects, Thurner et al. [46] constructed a measure based on differences in the wavelet-transform standard-deviation slope at different s cales. However the outcome was found to be unsatisfactory when compared with other availab le measures; we concluded the same about the results obtained by Peng et al. [51]. Using ROC analysis, as described in Sec. 2.7.3, we determined that the ROC area for the measure de scribed by Thurner et al. [46] was sufficiently small (0.917 for m= 4,16,and 256) that we abandoned this construct. Four of the techniques we have discussed in this Chapter (spe ctral, wavelet, detrended fluctuation analysis, and Allan factor) yield both scale-in dependent and scale-dependent measures and therefore afford us the opportunity of directly comparing these two classes of measures in individual calculations: αW↔σwav(32);αS↔Sτ(1/32);αD↔DFA(32); αA↔A(10). In each of these cases the fixed-scale measure is found t o greatly outperform the fractal-exponent measure for all data sizes examined, a s we previously illustrated for the pairsαW↔σwav(32) andαS↔Sτ(1/32) [47]. These results were recently confirmed in a follow-up Israeli–Danish study [66]. Moreover, in contras t with the substantial variability returned in fractal-exponent estimates, results for the di fferent scale-dependent measures at m= 32 intervals bear reasonable similarity to each other. Nunes Amaral et al. [56] recently concluded exactly the opposite, namely that s caling exponents provide superior performance to scale-dependen t measures. This may be because they relied exclusively on the distribution-dependent mea suresη≡h2andd2(see subsec- tions 2.7.1 and 3.5.1) rather than on distribution-indepen dent ROC analysis. These same authors [56] also purport to glean information from higher m oments of the wavelet coef- ficients, but the reliability of such information is questio nable because estimator variance 29increases with moment order [17]. 3.6.2 Computation Times of the Various Measures The computation times for the 16 measures considered in this Chapter are provided in Table 2. All measures were run ten times and averaged except f or the two DFA measures which, because of their long execution time, were run only on ce. These long execution times are associated with the suggested method for computing DFA [ 67], which is an N2process. DFA computation times therefore increase as the square of th e number of intervals whereas all 14 other methods, in contrast, are either of order NorNlog(N). Based on computation time, we can rank order the six scale-de pendent measures that fall into the first class, from fastest to slowest: σwav(32),Sτ(1/32),A(10),LF, VLF, and DFA(32). Because of its computational simplicity the wavel et-transform standard deviation σwav(32) computes more rapidly than any of the other measures. It is 3 times faster than that of its nearest competitor Sτ(1/32), 16.5 times faster than LF, and 32500 times faster than DFA(32). 3.6.3 Comparing the Most Effective Measures In subsections 3.3–3.5, we established that six measures su cceeded in completely separating the normal subjects from the CHF patients in our database for data lengths L≥215= 32768 RR intervals: VLF, LF, A(10),σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), and DFA(32). We now demonstrate from a fundamental point of view that these measures can all be vie wed as transformations of the interval-based power spectral density and that all are ther efore closely related. Consider first the relationships of VLF and LF to Sτ(1/32). At a frequency f= 1/32≈ 0.031 cycles/interval, Sτ(f) separates CHF patients from normal subjects; however, a ra nge of values of fprovide varying degrees of separability. For the data sets w e analyzed, sep- aration extends from f= 0.02 tof= 0.07 cycles/interval [49]. Recall that VLF and LF are simply integrals of Sτ(f) over particular ranges of f: fromf= 0.003 tof= 0.04 cy- cles/interval for VLF, and from f= 0.04 tof= 0.15 cycles/interval for LF. Since these ranges overlap with those for which the power spectral densi ty itself provides separability, it is not surprising that these spectral integrals also exhibi t this property. This illustrates the close relationship among VLF, LF, and Sτ(1/32). We next turn to the relation between σwav(32) andSτ(1/32). In Sec. 2.5.3 the relationship between these two measures was established as σ2 wav(m) =m/integraldisplay∞ −∞Sτ(f)H(mf)df, (23) 30revealing that σ2 wav(m) is simply a bandpass-filtered version of the interval-base d power spectral density for stationary signals. For the Haar wavel et, the bandpass filter H(mf) has a center frequency near 1 /m, and a bandwidth about that center frequency also near 1/m[49]. Accordingly, σ2 wav(32) is equivalent to a weighted integral of Sτ(f) centered about f= 1/32≈0.031, with an approximate range of integration of 0 .031±0.016 (0.016 to 0.047). Thus the separability of σ2 wav(32) is expected to resemble that of Sτ(1/32), and therefore that of VLF and LF as well. Now consider the count-based Allan factor evaluated at a cou nting time of ten seconds, A(10). Since the Allan factor is directly related to the varia nce of the Haar wavelet trans- form of the counts [36],A(10) is proportional to the wavelet transform of the countin g process evaluated over a wavelet duration of T= 20 sec. The count-based and interval- based measures are approximately related via Eq. (7) so that A(10) should be compared withσwav(20/E[τ])≈σwav(25) whose value, in turn, is determined by Sτ(1/25 = 0.04) and spectral components at nearby frequencies. Since this rang e ofSτ(f) is known to exhibit separability, so too should A(10). The relationship between detrended fluctuation analysis an d the other measures proves more complex than those delineated above. Nevertheless, DF A(32) can also be broadly in- terpreted in terms of an underlying interval-based power sp ectral density. To forge this link, we revisit the calculation of F(m) (see Sec. 2.5.4). The mean is first subtracted from the sequence of RR intervals {τi}resulting in a new sequence that has zero mean. This new ran- dom process has a power spectral density everywhere equal to Sτ(f), except at f= 0 where it assumes a value of zero. The summation of this zero-mean se quence generates the series y(k), as shown in Eq. (21). Since summation is represented by a tr ansfer function 1 /j2πf for small frequencies f, withj=√−1, the power spectral density of y(k) is approximately given by Sy(f)≈  0f= 0 Sτ(f) 4π2f2f∝ne}a⊔ionslash= 0.(24) Next, the sequence y(k) is divided into segments of length m. For the first segment, k= 1 tom, the best fitting linear trend ym(k) =β+γkis obtained; the residuals y(k)−ym(k) therefore have the minimum variance over all choices of βandγ. Over the duration of the entire sequence y(k), the local trend function ym(k) will consist of a series of such linear segments, and is therefore piecewise linear. Since ym(k) changes behavior over a time scale ofmintervals, its power will be concentrated at frequencies be low 1/m. Since the residuals y(k)−ym(k) have minimum variance, the spectrum of ym(k) will resemble that of y(k) as much as possible, and in particular at frequencies below 1 /mwhere most of its power is concentrated. Thus Sym(f)≈/braceleftBigg Sy(f)|f|<1/m 0 |f|>1/m.(25) 31Equation (22) shows the mean-square fluctuation F2(m) to be an estimate of the variance of the residuals y(k)−ym(k). By Parseval’s theorem, this variance equals the integral of the spectrum of the residuals over frequency. Therefore F2(m)≈2/integraldisplay∞ 0+[Sy(f)−Sym(f)]df= (2π2)−1/integraldisplay∞ 1/mSτ(f)f−2df (26) so that the mean-square fluctuation F2(m) can be represented as a weighted integral of the RR-interval spectrum over the appropriate frequency range . We conclude that all six measures that best distinguish CHF p atients from normal sub- jects are related in terms of transformations of the interva l-based power spectral density. 3.6.4 Selecting the Best Measures In the previous section we showed that the six most effective m easures are interrelated from a fundamental point of view. This conclusion is confirmed by t he overall similarity of the ROC-area curves for these measures, as can be seen in Fig. 8. We now proceed to compare these ROC areas more carefully in Fi g. 9. This figure presents 1 −ROC area plotted against the data length analyzed Lon a doubly logarithmic plot. This is in contrast to the usual presentation (such as F ig. 8) in which ROC area is plotted against Lon a semilogarithmic plot. The unconventional form of the pl ot in Fig. 9 is designed to allow small deviations from unity area to be hi ghlighted. Clearly, small values of the quantity 1 −ROC area are desirable. Of course, as the data length Ldiminishes, ROC area decreases (and therefore 1 −ROC area increases) for all six measures. The trends exhibited by all six measures displayed in Fig. 9 ( VLF,A(10), DFA(32), σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), and LF) are indeed broadly similar, as we observed in Fig . 8. For data sets that are sufficiently long, the six measures provide identical diagnostic capabilities (unity ROC area). At shorter data lengths, however, VLF, A(10), and DFA(32) exhibit more degradation than do the other three measures. In accordance with the analysis provided in Sec. 3.6.3, VLF deviates the most at small values of Lbecause it incorporates information from values of Sτ(f) well below the frequency range of separability. Similarly DFA(32) favors low-frequency contributions by virtue of the 1 /f2weighting function in Eq. (26). Finally, the performance of A(10) is suppressed because of the confounding effect of value s ofSτ(f) forf >0.07, as well as from possible errors deriving from our assumpt ions regarding the equivalence of the count-based and interval-based wavelet -transform variances. The remaining three measures therefore emerge as superior: LF,σwav(32), andSτ(1/32). Judged on the basis of both performance (Fig. 9) andcomputation time (Table 2), we conclude that two of these are best: σwav(32)andSτ(1/32). 32It is desirable to confirm these conclusions for other record s, comprising out-of-sample data sets from CHF patients and normal subjects. It will also be of interest to examine the correlation of ROC area with severity of cardiac dysfunctio n as judged, for example, by the NYHA clinical scale. It is also important to conduct compari sons with other CHF studies that make use of HRV measures [3]. A sufficiently large database of normal and CHF records would m ake it possible to ex- amine the detailed distinctions between the two classes of p atients over a range of scales surrounding m= 32. A superior measure which draws on these distinctions in an optimal way could then be designed; for example the weighting functi on in an integral over Sτ(f) could be customized. Other measures that simultaneously in corporate properties inherent in collections of the individual measures considered here c ould also be developed. 4 Markers for Other Cardiac Pathologies Returning to the individual-value plots in Fig. 5, we briefly examine the behavior of the 16 measures for several other cardiovascular disorders for which these measures may hold promise. Among these are three CHF patients who also suffer fr om atrial fibrillation (CHF ¯ c AF, third column, △), one heart-transplant patient (TRANSPLANT, fourth colum n,×+), one ventricular-tachycardia patient (VT, fifth column, ♦), one sudden-cardiac-death patient (SCD, sixth column, ⊔ ⊓), and two sleep-apnea patients (APNEA, last column, +). A su mmary of the more salient statistics of the original RR recordings for these patients is presented in Table A1. Prior to analysis, the RR records were truncated at Lmax= 75821 RR intervals to match the lengths of the CHF-patient and normal-subject r ecords. The two sleep-apnea data records were drawn from the MIT-BIH Polysomnographic D atabase (Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology) and comprised 1 6874 and 15751 RR intervals respectively. Because of the limited duration of the sleep p eriod, records containing larger numbers of RR intervals are not available for this disorder. Too few patient recordings are available to us to reasonably evaluate the potential of these HRV measures for the diagnosis of these forms of cardio vascular disease, but the results presented here might suggest which measures would p rove useful given large numbers of records. We first note that for most of the 16 measures, the values for th e three CHF patients with atrial fibrillation ( △) tend to fall within the range set by the other twelve CHF pati ents without atrial fibrillation. In particular the same six meas ures that completely separate normal subjects from CHF patients ¯ s AF continue to do so when CHF patients ¯ c AF are included. The inclusion of the AF patients reduces the separ ability only for three of the 16 measures: pNN50, HF, and αW. 33Results for the heart transplant patient ( ×+) appear towards the pathological end of the CHF range for many measures, and for some measures the transp lant value extends beyond the range of all of the CHF patients. Conversely, the sleep ap nea values (+) typically fall at the end of, or beyond, the range spanned by the normal s ubjects. Indeed, three thresholds can be chosen for Sτ(1/32) (i.e., 0.000008, 0.0006, and 0.00436) which completely separate four classes of patients: sleep apnea [largest val ues ofSτ(1/32)], normal subjects (next largest), CHF with or without atrial fibrillation (nex t largest), and heart transplant (smallest). While such separation will no doubt disappear a s large numbers of additional patient records are included, we nevertheless expect the la rgest variability (measured at 32 intervals as well as at other scales) to be associated with sl eep-apnea patients since their fluctuating breathing patterns induce greater fluctuations in the heart rate. Conversely, heart-transplant patients (especially in the absence of re innervation) are expected to exhibit the lowest values of variability since the autonomic nervou s system, which contributes to the modulation of heart rate at these time scales, is subfunctio nal. Results for the ventricular tachycardia patient ( ♦) lie within the normal range for most measures, though the value for LF /HF is well beyond the pathological end of the range for CHF patients. Interestingly, four measures [VLF, HF, SDANN , andA(10)] yield the largest values for the ventricular tachycardia patient of the 32 dat a sets examined. Perhaps A(10), which exhibits the largest separation between the value for this patient and those for the other 31 patients, will prove useful in detecting ventricul ar tachycardia. Finally we consider results for the sudden-cardiac-death p atient ( ⊔ ⊓), which lie between the ranges of normal subjects and CHF patients for all but one (LF) of the six measures which separate these two patient classes. The pNN50 and HF re sults, on the other hand, reveal values beyond the normal set, thereby indicating the presence of greater variability on a short time scale than for other patients. The value of SDA NN for the SCD patient is greater than that for any of the other 31 patients so it is poss ible that SDANN could prove useful in predicting sudden cardiac death. 5 Does Deterministic Chaos Play a Role in Heart Rate Variability? The question of whether normal HRV arises from a low-dimensi onal attractor associated with a deterministic dynamical system or has stochastic und erpinnings has continued to entice researchers [61]. Previous studies devoted to this q uestion have come to conflicting conclusions. The notion that the normal human-heartbeat se quence is chaotic appears to have been first set forth by Goldberger and West [68]. Papers i n support of this hypothesis [69], as well as in opposition to it [70, 71], have appeared re cently. An important factor that pertains to this issue is the recognition that correlation, rather than nonlinear dynamics, can 34lie behind these seemingly chaotic recordings [8]. We address this question in this section and conclude, for bo th normal subjects and patients with several forms of cardiac dysfunction, that th e sequence of heartbeat intervals does not exhibit chaos. 5.1 Methods 5.1.1 Phase-Space Reconstruction One way of approaching the question of chaos in heartbeat rec ordings is in terms of a phase-space reconstruction and the use of an algorithm to es timate one or more of its fractal dimensions Dq[6, 59, 72]. The box-counting algorithm [73] provides a meth od for estimating the capacity (or box-counting) dimension D0of the attractor [6, 8, 72, 74]. The phase-space reconstruction approach operates on the ba sis that the topological prop- erties of the attractor for a dynamical system can be determi ned from the time series of a single observable [75, 76, 77]. A p-dimensional vector→ T≡ {τi,τi+l,...τi+(p−1)l}is formed from the sequence of RR intervals {τi}. The parameter pis the embedding dimension, and lis the lag, usually taken to be the location of the first zero cr ossing of the autocorrelation function of the time series under study. As the time index iprogresses, the vector→ Ttraces out a trajectory in the p-dimensional embedding space. The box-counting algorithm estimates the capacity dimensi on of this trajectory. Specif- ically, the negative slope of the logarithm of the number of f ull boxes versus the logarithm of the width of the boxes, over a range of 4 /[max(τ)−min(τ)] to 32/[max(τ)−min(τ)] boxes, in powers of two, provides an estimate of D0. For convenience in the generation of phase-randomized surrogates, data sets were limited to pow ers of two: 216= 65536 intervals for all but the two sleep apnea data sets, for which 214= 16384 and 213= 8192 intervals were used respectively (the sleep apnea data sets are much shorte r than the others as indicated in Table A1). For uncorrelated noise, the capacity dimension D0continues to increase as the embedding dimension pincreases. For an attractor in a deterministic system, in co ntrast,D0 saturates as pbecomes larger than 2 D0+1 [74]. Such saturation, however, is not a definitive signature of deterministic dynamics; temporal correlatio n in a stochastic process can also be responsible for what appears to be underlying deterministi c dynamics [8, 78, 79, 80]. The distribution of the data can also play a role. Surrogate data analysis, discussed in Sec. 5.1.3, is useful in establishing the underlying cause, by proving or disproving various null hypotheses tha t the measured behavior arises from other, non-chaotic causes. 355.1.2 Removing Correlations in the Data Adjacent intervals in heartbeat sequences prove to exhibit large degrees of correlation. The serial correlation coefficient for RR intervals ρ(τ)≡E[τi+1τi]−E2[τi] E[τ2 i]−E2[τi], exceeds 0.9 for two thirds of the data sets examined, with an a verage value of 0.83; the theoretical maximum is unity, with zero representing a lack of serial correlation. Since such large correlation is known to interfere with the detect ion of deterministic dynamics, we instead employ the first difference of the RR intervals: vi≡τi−τi+1. Such a simple transformation does not change the topological properties of dynamical system behavior, and a related but more involved procedure is known to reduce e rror in estimating other fractal dimensions [81]. The serial correlation coefficient for the differenced sequen ce{vi}turns out to have a mean value of -0.084, and none exceeds 0.6 in magnitude. This sequence will therefore be used to generate the embedding vector→ T≡ {vi,vi+1,...vi+p−1}, with the lag lset to unity sinceρ(v)≈0. 5.1.3 Surrogate Data Analysis Information about the nature of an interval or segment serie s may be obtained by applying various statistical measures to surrogate data sets. These are processes constructed from the original data in ways designed to preserve certain characte ristics of the original data while eliminating (or modifying) others. Surrogate data analysi s provides a way of determining whether a given result arises from a particular property of t he data set. We make use of two kinds of surrogate data sets: shuffled interv als and randomized phases. In particular, we compare statistical measures cal culated from both the original data and from its surrogates to distinguish those propertie s of the data set that arise from correlations (such as from long-term rate fluctuations) fro m those properties inherent in the form of the original data. Shuffled intervals. The first class of surrogate data is formed by shuffling (random ly reordering) the sequence of RR intervals of the original dat a set. Such random reordering destroys dependencies among the intervals, and therefore t he correlation properties of the data, while exactly preserving the interval histogram. As a refinement, it is possible to divide the data into blocks and shuffle intervals within each b lock, while keeping each block 36separate. In this case dependencies remain over durations m uch larger than the block size, while being destroyed for durations smaller than it. Randomized phases. The other class of surrogate data we consider is obtained by F ourier transforming the original interval data, and then randomiz ing the phases while leaving the spectral magnitudes intact. The modified function is then in verse-transformed to return to a time-domain representation of the intervals. This techni que exactly preserves the second- order correlation properties of the interval sequence whil e removing other temporal structure, for example that needed for phase-space reconstruction. Th e interval histogram typically becomes Gaussian for this surrogate as a result of the centra l limit theorem. 5.2 Absence of Chaos In Fig. 10 we present plots of the capacity dimension D0plotted against the embedding dimensionpfor the 12 normal subjects. Similar plots are presented in Fi g. 11 for CHF patients without atrial fibrillation, and in Fig. 12 for pati ents with other cardiac pathologies. For most of the panels in Fig. 10, the D0estimate for the original data (solid curve) is indeed seen to rise with increasing embedding dimension p, and shows evidence of approaching an asymptotic value of about 2. The phase-randomized data (dot ted curve) yields somewhat higher results, consistent with the presence of a determini stic attractor. However, estimates of D0for the shuffled data (dashed curve) nearly coincide with thos e of the original data. This surrogate precisely maintains th e distribution of the relative sizes of the differenced RR intervals, but destroys any correlatio n or other dependencies in the data. Specifically, no deterministic structure remains in t he shuffled surrogate. Therefore, the apparent asymptote in D0must derive from the particular form of the RR-interval dis- tribution, and not from a nonlinear dynamical attractor. To quantify the closeness between results for original and shuffled data, the shuffling process wa s performed ten times with ten different random seeds. The average of these ten independent shufflings forms the dashed curve, with error bars representing the largest and smalles t estimates obtained for D0at each corresponding embedding dimension. Results for the or iginal data indeed lie within the error bars. Therefore, the original data does not differ f rom the shuffled data at the [(10−1)/(10 + 1)]100% = 82% significance level. Results for a good number of the other 31 data sets, normal and pathological alike, are nearly the same; the original data lie within the error bars o f the shuffled surrogates and consequently do not exhibit significant evidence of determi nistic dynamics. However for some records the original data exceed the limits set by the te n shufflings. But attributing this behavior to low-dimensional chaos proves difficult for a lmost all the data records, for three reasons. First, the surrogates often yield smaller results forD0than the original data, 37while shuffling data from a true chaotic system will theoretic ally yield largerD0estimates. Second, of those data sets for which the original results fal l below those of their shuffled surrogates, few achieve an asymptotic value for D0, but rather continue to climb steadily with increasing embedding dimension. Finally, for the rema ining data sets, the original and shuffled data yield curves that do not differ nearly as much as do those from simulated systems known to be chaotic, such as the H´ enon attractor (not shown) [82]. Taken together, these observations suggest that finite data length, residual corr elations, and/or other unknown effects in these RR-interval recordings give rise to behavio r in the phase-space reconstruction that can masquerade as chaos. Results for the phase-randomized surrogates (dotted curve s in Figs. 10-12), while exhibit- ing a putative capacity dimension in excess of the original d ata and of the shuffled surro- gates for every patient, exhibit a remarkable similarity to each other. This occurs because the differenced-interval sequence {vi}displays little correlation and the phase-randomization process preserves this lack of correlation while imposing a Gaussian differenced-interval dis- tribution. The result is nearly white Gaussian noise regard less of the original data set, and indeed results for independently generated white Gaussian noise closely follow these curves (not shown). Time series measured from the heart under distinctly non-no rmal operating conditions such as ventricular fibrillation [83], or those obtained und er non-physiological conditions such as from excised hearts [84], may exhibit chaotic behavior un der some circumstances. This is precisely the situation for cellular vibrations in the mamm alian cochlea [85, 86, 87]. When the exciting sound pressure level (SPL) is in the normal phys iological regime, the cellular- vibration velocities are nonlinear but not chaotic. When th e SPL is increased beyond the normal range, however, routes to chaos emerge. It has been su ggested that since chaos- control methods prove effective for removing such behavior, the heartbeat sequence must be chaotic. This is an unwarranted conclusion since such metho ds often work equally well for purely stochastic systems, which cannot be chaotic [88]. 6 Mathematical Models for Heart Rate Variability The emphasis in this Chapter has been on HRV analysis. The dia gnostic capabilities of various measures have been presented and compared. However the results that emerge from these studies also serve to expose the mathematical-statis tical character of the RR time series. Such information can be of benefit in the development of mathematical models which can be used to simulate RR sequences. Such models may prove us eful for generating realistic heartbeat sequences in pacemakers, for example, and for dev eloping improved physiological models of the cardiovascular system. In this section we eval uate the suitability of several integrate-and-fire constructs for modeling heart rate vari ability. 386.1 Integrate-and-Fire Model Integrate-and-fire models are widely used in the neuroscien ces [89] as well as in cardiology [8, 90, 91, 92, 93]. These models are attractive in part becau se they capture known physiology in a simple way. The integration of a rate process can represe nt the cumulative effect of neurotransmitter on the postsynaptic membrane of a neuron, or the currents responsible for the pacemaker potential in the sino-atrial node of the he art. The crossing of a preset threshold by the integrated rate then gives rise to an action potential, or a heart contraction. The sequence of discrete events comprising the human heartb eat can be viewed as a point process deriving from a continuous rate function. The integ rate-and-fire method is perhaps the simplest means for generating a point process from a rate process [8, 17]. In this model, illustrated schematically in Fig. 13, the rate function λ(t) is integrated until it reaches a fixed thresholdθ, whereupon a point event is generated and the integrator is r eset to zero. Thus the occurrence time of the ( i+ 1)st event is implicitly obtained from the first occurrence of /integraldisplayti+1 tiλ(t)dt=θ. (27) The mean heart rate λ(beats/sec) is given by λ= E[λ(t)] = 1/E[τ]. Because the conversion from the rate process to the point process is so direct, most s tatistics of the point process closely mimic those of the underlying rate process λ(t). In particular, for frequencies sub- stantially lower than the mean heart rate, the theoretical p ower spectral densities of the point process and the underlying rate coincide [17]. 6.2 Kernel of the Integrate-and-Fire Model The detailed statistical behavior of the point process gene rated by the integrate-and-fire construct depends on the statistical character of the rate f unction in the integrand of Eq. (27) [8]. The fractal nature of the heartbeat sequence requires t hat the rate function λ(t) itself be fractal. Assuming that the underlying rate is stochastic noise, there are three plausible candidates for λ(t) [17]: fractal Gaussian noise, fractal lognormal noise, an d fractal binomial noise. We briefly discuss these three forms of noise in turn. 6.2.1 Fractal Gaussian Noise Fractal Gaussian noise served admirably in our initial effor ts to develop a suitable integrate- and-fire model for the heartbeat sequence [8]. A Gaussian pro cess has values that, at any set of times, form a jointly Gaussian random vector. This pro perty, along with its mean and spectrum, completely define the process. We consider a stati onary rate process with a mean 39equal to the expected heart rate, and a 1 /f-typerate-based spectrum that takes the form [17] Sλ(ftime) =λ2δ(ftime) +λ[1 + (ftime/f0)−α]. (28) Here,λ(beats/sec) and αare the previously defined heart rate and fractal exponent re - spectively,δ(·) is again the Dirac delta function, and f0is the cutoff frequency (cycles/sec). Mathematically, cutoffs at low or high frequencies (or somet imes both) are required to ensure thatτhas a finite variance. In practice, the finite duration of the s imulation guarantees the former cutoff, while the finite time resolution of the simulat ed samples of τguarantees the latter. It is to be noted that the designation fractal Gaussi an noise properly applies only for α<1; the range 1 <α< 3 is generated by fractal Brownian motion [19]. In the intere st of simplicity, however, we employ the term fractal Gaussian no ise for all values of α. There are a number of recipes in the literature for generatin g fractal Gaussian noise [94, 95, 96, 97]. All typically result in a sampled version of fractal Gaussian noise, with equal spacing between samples. A continuous version of the s ignal is obtained by using a zeroth-order interpolation between the samples. The use of a fractal Gaussian noise kernel in the integrate-a nd-fire construct results in the so-called fractal-Gaussian-noise driven integrate-a nd-fire model [8, 17]. The mean of the rate process is generally required to be much larger than its standard deviation, in part so that the times when the rate is negative (during which no even ts may be generated) remain small. Theinterval -based spectrum is obtained by applying Eq. (7) to Eq. (28) (s ee Sec. 2.2 and Ref. [9]). The following approximate result, in terms of interval-based frequency f, is obtained: Sτ(f)≈λ−2[δ(f) + 1 + (λf/f 0)−α]. (29) We proceed to discuss two other physiologically based noise inputs [17]; both reduce to fractal Gaussian noise in appropriate limits. 6.2.2 Fractal Lognormal Noise A related process results from passing fractal Gaussian noi se through a memoryless ex- ponential transform. This process plays a role in neurotran smitter exocytosis [98]. Since the exponential of a Gaussian is lognormal, we refer to this p rocess as fractal lognormal noise [17, 98]. If X(t) denotes a fractal Gaussian noise process with mean E[ X], variance Var[X], and autocovariance function KX(τ), thenλ(t)≡exp[X(t)] is a fractal lognormal noise process with moments E[ λn] = exp(nE[X] +n2Var[X]/2) and autocovariance function Kλ(τ) = E2[λ](exp[KX(τ)]−1) [98]. 40By virtue of the exponential transform, the autocorrelatio n functions of the Gaussian processX(t) and the lognormal process λ(t) differ; thus their spectra differ. In particular, the power spectral density of the resulting point process do es not follow the exact form of Eq. (28), although for small values of Var[ X] the experimental periodogram closely resembles this ideal form [98]. In the limit of very small values of Var[ X], the exponential operation approaches a linear transform, and the rate process reduces to fractal Gaussian noise. 6.2.3 Fractal Binomial Noise A third possible kernel for the integrate-and-fire model is f ractal binomial noise. This process results from the addition of a number of independent identic al alternating fractal renewal pro- cesses. The sum is a binomial process with the same fractal ex ponent as each of the individual alternating fractal processes [99, 100]. This binomial pro cess can serve as a rate function for an integrate-and-fire process; the result is the fractal-bi nomial-noise driven integrate-and-fire model [17]. This construct was initially designed to model t he superposition of alternating currents from a number of ion channels with fractal behavior [99, 100, 101, 102]. As the num- ber of constituent processes increases, fractal binomial n oise converges to fractal Gaussian noise with the same fractal exponent therefore leading to th e fractal-Gaussian-noise driven integrate-and-fire point process [17]. 6.3 Jittered Integrate-and-Fire Model Conventional integrate-and-fire constructs have only a sin gle source of randomness, the rate processλ(t). It is sometimes useful to incorporate a second source of ra ndomness into such models. One way to carry this out is to impose random jitt er on the interevent times generated in the integrate-and-fire process [17]. The procedure used for imposing this jitter is as follows. Af ter generating the time of the (i+ 1)st event ti+1in accordance with Eq. (27), the ( i+ 1)st interevent time τi+1=ti+1−ti is multiplied by a dimensionless Gaussian-distributed ran dom variable with unit mean and varianceσ2. This results in the replacement of ti+1by ti+1+σ(ti+1−ti)Ni (30) before the simulation of subsequent events ( ti+2,ti+3,...). The quantity {Ni}represents a sequence of zero-mean, unity-variance independent Gauss ian random variables and the standard deviation σis a free parameter that controls the strength of the proport ional jitter. In accordance with the construction of the model, events at s ubsequent times experience jitter imposed by all previous events (see Fig. 14). 41The overall result is the jittered integrate-and-fire model . The jitter serves to introduce a source of scale-independent noise into the point process. D epending on the character of the input rate function, this model can give rise to the fractal- Gaussian-noise, fractal-lognormal- noise, or fractal-binomial-noise driven jittered integra te-and-fire processes, among others. Two limiting behaviors readily emerge from this model. When σ→0, the jitter disappears and the jittered integrate-and-fire model reduces to the ord inary integrate-and-fire model. At the other extreme, when σ→ ∞, the jitter dominates and the result is a homogeneous Poisson process. The fractal behavior present in the rate fu nctionλ(t) then disappears and λ(t) behaves as if it were constant. Between these two limits, as σincreases the fractal onset time 1/f0of the resulting point process increases and the fractal cha racteristics of the point process are progressively lost, first at higher frequencies (shorter times) and subsequently at lower frequencies (longer times) [17]. 6.3.1 Simulating the Jittered Integrate-and-Fire Point Pr ocess We use a fractal Gaussian noise kernel in the jittered integr ate-and-fire construct to simulate the human heartbeat. Fractal Gaussian noise with the approp riate mean, standard deviation, and fractal exponent αSis generated using Fourier-transform methods. This noise s erves as the kernel in an integrate-and-fire element [Eq. (27)], the o utput of which is jittered in accordance with Eq. (30). For each of the 12 normal subjects a nd 15 CHF (¯ s and ¯ c AF) patients, the model parameters were adjusted iteratively t o obtain a simulated data set that matched the patient recording as closely as possible. In par ticular, each of the 27 simulations contained exactly Lmax= 75821 RR intervals, displayed mean heart rates that fell wi thin 1% of the corresponding data recordings, and exhibited wavele t-transform standard deviations that were nearly identical with those of the data. The simula tion results for CHF patients with and without atrial fibrillation were very similar. 6.3.2 Statistics of the Simulated Point Process for Normal S ubjects and CHF Patients Having developed the jittered integrate-and-fire model and simulated sequences of RR inter- vals, we proceed to examine some of the statistical features of the resulting point processes. Figure 15 displays representative results in which the data (solid curves) and simulations (dotted curves) are compared for a single normal subject (le ft column) and a single CHF (¯ s AF) patient (right column). Figure 15(a) illustrates that t he RR-interval sequences obtained from the model and the data are qualitatively similar, for bo th the normal and heart-failure cases. Furthermore, the agreement between the simulated an d actual wavelet-transform standard-deviation curves is excellent in both cases, as is evident in Fig. 15(b). Even the gentle increase of σwavfor the heart-failure patient at small scale values is repro duced, by 42virtue of the jitter introduced into the model. It is apparen t in Fig. 15(c), however, that the simulated RR-interval histogram for the heart-failure patient does not fit the actual histogram well; it is too broad which indicates that σintof the simulation is too large. Finally, Fig. 15(d) shows that the simulated spectra of the RR interva ls match the experimental spectra quite nicely, including the whitening of the heart- failure spectrum at high frequencies. This latter effect is the counterpart of the flattening of σwavat small scales, and results from the white noise introduced by the jitter at high frequencies . 6.3.3 Simulated Individual Value Plots and ROC-Area Curves To examine how well the jittered integrate-and-fire model mi mics the collection of data from a global perspective, we constructed individual-value plo ts and ROC-area curves using the 27 simulated data sets. The results are presented in Figs. 16 and 17 respectively. Direct comparison should be made with Figs. 5 and 8, respectively, w hich provide the same plots for the actual heart-failure patient and normal-subject da ta. Comparing Fig. 16 with Fig. 5, and Fig. 17 with Fig. 8, we see th at in most cases the simulated and actual results are remarkably similar. Ba sed on their overall ability to distinguish between CHF and normal simulations for the full set of 75821 RR intervals, the 16 measures portrayed in Fig. 16 roughly fall into three c lasses. A similar division was observed for the actual data, as discussed in Sec. 3.6 As is evident in Fig. 16, five measures (indicated by boldface font) succeed in fully separating the two kinds of simulations and, by definition, f all into the first class: VLF, LF, σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), and DFA(32). These measures share a dependence on a sing le scale, or small range of scales, near 32 heartbeat intervals. However , of these five measures only two (LF and VLF) successfully separate the simulated results fo r the next smaller number of RR intervals (L= 65536) and none succeeds in doing so for yet smaller values o fL. These same five measures also fully distinguish the normal su bjects from the CHF patients (see Fig. 5); however a sixth measure, A(10), also achieves this. For the actual data all six of these measures successfully separate the actual heart-f ailure patients from the normal subjects for data lengths down to L= 32768 RR intervals. The simulated ROC-area curves presented in Fig. 17 resemble the curves for the normal and CHF data shown in Fig. 8, but there are a few notable distin ctions. The simulated and actual ROC areas (Figs. 17 and 8 respectively) for the interv al measures SDANN and σint are just about the same for L= 64 RR intervals. However both of these measures exhibit decreasing ROC areas as the number of simulated RR intervals ( L) increases (Fig. 17). In contrast, the ROC areas based on the actual data increase wit h increasing data length L in normal fashion (Fig. 8). The decrease in ROC area observed in Fig. 17 means that 43performance is degraded as the simulated data length increa ses. This paradoxical result likely arises from a deficiency of the model; it proved imposs ible to simultaneously fit the wavelet-transform standard deviation at all scales, the me an heart rate, and the RR-interval standard deviation. Choosing to closely fit the two former qu antities to the data rendered inaccurate the simulated interval standard deviation. Sin ce shorter files have insufficient length to exhibit the longer term fluctuations that dominate fractal activity, the interval standard deviation for small values of Lis not influenced by these fluctuations. Apparently the manner in which the long-term effects are expressed differ s in the original data and in the simulation. The most surprising distinction between the actual and simu lated results, perhaps, is the dramatic putative improvement in the ability of the five scal e-independent fractal-exponent measures to separate simulated heart-failure and normal da ta, as the number of RR intervals increases. The Allan factor exponent αAappears to offer the greatest “improvement”, as is seen by comparing Figs. 17 and 8. All of the exponents excep tαWattain an ROC area exceeding 0.97 for Lmax= 75821 RR intervals. Nevertheless, the improved separatio n yields performance that remains inferior to that of the fixed-scale measures. The apparent improved separation in the simulated data may therefore arise from a n onlinear interaction in the model between the fractal behavior and the signal component near a scale of 32 heartbeat intervals. Or it may be that some aspect of the data, not reliably detecte d by fractal-exponent measures applied to the original data, emerges more clearly followin g the modeling and simulation. This could mean that another measure of the fractal exponent of the actual data, perhaps incorporating in some way the processing provided by the mod eling procedure, might yield better results than the more straightforward fractal-expo nent measures that we have used to this point. 6.3.4 Limitations of the Jittered Integrate-and-Fire Mode l Figure 18 presents a direct comparison between four measure s derived from the original data and from the corresponding simulations. Each panel contain s 12 normal results (+), 12 CHF ¯ s AF results ( ×), and 3 CHF ¯ c AF results ( △). The diagonal lines correspond to perfect agreement. The results for Sτ(1/32) andσwav(32) are excellent, illustrating the remarkable ability of the model to mimic the data at a time scale of 32 interbeat inte rvals. The correlation coeffi- cients for these two measures lie very close to unity, indica ting almost perfect correspondence between the original and simulated data. The upper left panel presents values for σint, the standard deviation of the RR intervals. Agreement between the simulation and original data is only f air, with simulated values of σintgenerally somewhat higher than desired. The correlation co efficientρ= 0.71 for all 27 44simulations indicates significant correlation ( p <0.0003 that 27 random pairs of numbers with the same distribution would achieve a magnitude of ρ≥0.71), but not extremely close agreement between simulated and original RR-interval sequ ences. This disagreement highlights a problem with the simple jitt ered integrate-and-fire model. The fractal-Gaussian-noise integrate-and-fire model without jitter yields substantially closer agreement between the data and simulation for this statisti c [8]. Although the introduction of jitter leads to improved agreement for σwav, it brings the model results further away from the data as measured by σint. Apparently, a method other than jitter must be devised to forge increased agreement with σwav, while not degrading the agreement with σint. One possibility is the reordering of the individual RR interval s over short time scales. The simulated exponent αWalso fails to show close agreement with the data, suggesting that there are other features of the model that are less than i deal. However, since this measure is of little use in separating CHF patients from norm al subjects, this disagreement takes on reduced importance. 6.4 Toward an Improved Model of Heart Rate Variability Agreement between the simulations and data would most likel y be improved by adding other inputs to the model aside from fractal noise, as illust rated schematically in Fig. 19. Input signals related to respiration and blood pressure are two likely candidates since it is well known that variations in these physiological function s influence heart rate variability. Experience also teaches us that there is a measure of white Ga ussian noise present, possibly associated with the measurement process. As indicated in Sec. 6.3.4, the introduction of jitter in the integrate-and-fire construct improves the agreement of the model with certain features of the the data, but degrades it for others. An adaptive reset will provide a more flexible altern ative to the jitter. Moreover, the thresholdθcould be converted into a stochastic process as a way of incor porating variability in other elements of the system [17]. All things considered, the jittered integrate-and-fire con struct does a rather good job of mimicking the actual data, though the introduction of a more physiologically based model would be a welcome addition. 457 Conclusion For the purposes of heart-rate-variability analysis, the o ccurrence times of the sequence of R phases in the electrocardiogram can be represented as a f ractal-rate stochastic point process. Using a collection of standard and novel heart-rat e-variability measures, we have examined the sequence of times between the R phases, viz.the RR time series, of ECGs recorded from normal subjects and congestive heart-failur e patients, as well as from several patients with other cardiovascular disorders. Congestive -heart-failure patients who also suf- fered from atrial fibrillation were treated as a separate cla ss. We examined sixteen heart-rate- variability measures, comprising frequency-domain, time -domain, scaling-exponent, Allan- factor, detrended-fluctuation-analysis, and wavelet-tra nsform methods. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was used to c ompare and contrast the per- formance of these sixteen measures with respect to their abi lities to properly distinguish heart-failure patients from normal subjects over a broad ra nge of record lengths (minutes to hours). Scale-dependent measures rendered performance th at was substantially superior to that of scale-independent ones. Judged on the basis of perfo rmance and computation time, two measures of the sixteen emerged at the top of the list: the wavelet-transform standard deviationσwav(32) and the RR-interval-based power spectral density Sτ(1/32). They share in common the dependence on a single scale, or small range of s cales, near 32 heartbeat intervals. The behavior of the ECG at this particular scale, corresponding to about 25 sec, turns out to be a significant marker for the presence of cardia c dysfunction. The scale value itself is far more important than the details of the measures used to examine it. Application of these techniques to a large database of norma l and CHF records will make it possible to uncover just how the ECGs of pathological pati ents differ from those of normal subjects in the vicinity of this special scale. This would fa cilitate the development of an op- timal diagnostic measure, which might take the form of a spec ialized weighting function over the interval-based power spectral density or over some comb ination of elementary measures. We also addressed an issue of fundamental importance in card iac physiology: the deter- mination of whether the RR time series arises from a chaotic a ttractor or has an underlying stochastic origin. Using nonlinear-dynamics theory, toge ther with surrogate-data analysis, we established that the RR sequences from both normal subjec ts and pathological patients have stochastic, rather than deterministic, origins. The u se of a special embedding of the differences between adjacent RR intervals enabled us to reach this concl usion. This tech- nique substantially reduced the natural correlations inhe rent in the interbeat-interval time series which can masquerade as chaos and confound simpler an alyses. Finally, we developed a jittered integrate-and-fire model b uilt around a fractal-Gaussian- noise kernel. Simulations based on this model provided real istic, though not perfect, replicas of real heartbeat sequences. The model was least successful in predicting interbeat-interval 46statistics and fractal-exponent values. Nevertheless it c ould find use in some applications such as pacemaker excitation. To confirm the observations we have reported, it will be desir able to carry out continua- tion studies using large numbers of out-of-sample records. It will also be useful to examine how the performance of the various measures correlates with the severity of cardiac dysfunc- tion as judged, for example, by the NYHA clinical scale. Comp arisons with existing CHF studies that make use of HRV measures should also be conducte d. 47Appendix A Table A1 provides a summary of some significant statistics of the RR records analyzed in this Chapter, before truncation to 75821 intervals. 48Figure Captions Fig. 1. In HRV analysis the electrocardiogram (ECG) schemat ized in (a) is represented by a sequence of times of the R phases which form an unmarked poin t process [vertical arrows in (b)]. This sequence may be analyzed as a sequence of counts {Ni}(T) in a predetermined time interval Tas shown in (c), or as a sequence of interbeat (RR) intervals {τi}as shown in (d). The sequence of counts forms a discrete-time random cou nting process of nonnegative integers whereas the sequence of intervals forms a sequence of positive real-valued random numbers. Fig. 2. Estimating the wavelet transform using the Haar wave let: (a) original Haar wavelet; (b) delayed and scaled version of the wavelet ( m= 16,n= 3); and (c) time series multiplied by this wavelet. Fig. 3. (a) Series of interbeat intervals τiversus interval number ifor a typical nor- mal patient (data set n16265). (Adjacent values of the inter beat interval are connected by straight lines to facilitate viewing.) Substantial trends are evident. The interbeat-interval standard deviation σint≡SDNN is indicated. (b) Wavelet transform Wm,n(m) (calculated using a Daubechies 10-tap analyzing wavelet) at three scale s (m= 4, 16, 256) vs. interval numberi(=mn) for the RR-interval sequence shown in (a). The trends in the original interbeat-interval time series are removed by the wavelet t ransformation. The wavelet- transform standard deviation σwav(m) for this data set is seen to increase with the scale m. Fig. 4. Haar-wavelet-transform standard deviation σwav(m) vs scalemfor the 12 normal subjects (+), 12 CHF patients without (¯ s) atrial fibrillati on (×), and the 3 CHF patients with (¯ c) atrial fibrillation ( △). Each data set comprises the first 75821 RR intervals of a recording drawn from the Beth-Israel Hospital heart-failu re database. Complete separation of the normal subjects and heart-failure patients is achiev ed at scales m= 16 and 32 interbeat intervals. Fig. 5. Individual value plots (data) for the 16 measures. Ea ch panel corresponds to a different HRV measure. The seven columns in each panel, from l eft to right, comprise data for (1) 12 normal subjects (+), (2) 12 CHF patients ¯ s AF ( ×), (3) 3 CHF patients ¯ c AF ( △), (4) 1 heart-transplant patient ( ×+), (5) 1 ventricular tachycardia patient ( ♦), (6) 1 sudden- cardiac-death patient ( ⊔ ⊓), and (7) 2 sleep apnea patients (+). Each data set comprises 75821 RR intervals except for the two sleep apnea data sets which co mprise 16874 and 15751 RR intervals respectively. The six measures highlighted in bo ldface font succeed in completely separating normal subjects and CHF patients (¯ s and ¯ c atria l fibrillation) VLF,LF,A(10), σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), andDFA(32) . Fig. 6. Positive (solid curves) and negative (dotted curves ) predictive values for all 4916 HRV measures plotted against the threshold θ, each in its own panel. These curves are constructed using the 12 normal and 12 heart-failure (¯ s AF) records drawn from the CHF database, each of which has been truncated to 75821 RR int ervals. The six measures highlighted in boldface font exhibit threshold regions for which both the positive and negative predictive values are unity: VLF,LF,A(10),σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), andDFA(32) . This indicates that the normal subjects and CHF (¯ s AF) patients c an be completely distinguished by these six measures, in accordance with the results establ ished in Fig. 5. Fig. 7. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves ( sensitivity vs 1 −specificity) for all 16 HRV measures, each in its own panel. These curves are co nstructed using the 12 normal and 12 heart-failure (¯ s AF) records drawn from the CH F database, each of which has been truncated to 75821 RR intervals. The six measures hi ghlighted in boldface font simultaneously achieve 100% sensitivity and 100% specifici ty so that the ROC curve is per- fectly square: VLF,LF,A(10),σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), andDFA(32) . This indicates that the normal subjects and CHF (¯ s AF) patients can be completel y distinguished by these six measures, in accordance with the results established in Fig s. 5 and 6. Fig. 8. Diagnostic accuracy (area under ROC curve) as a funct ion of record length analyzedL(number of RR intervals) for the 16 HRV measures (mean ±1 S.D.). An area of unity corresponds to perfect separability of the two clas ses of patients. The six measures highlighted in boldface font ( VLF,LF,A(10),σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), and DFA(32) ) provide such perfect separability at the longest record len gths, in accordance with the results in Fig. 7. As the record length decreases performance degrad es at a different rate for each measure. The five scale-independent measures, αD,αW,αS,αA, andαR, perform poorly at all data lengths. Fig. 9. 1 −ROC area as a function of data length L, on a doubly logarithmic plot, for the six most effective measures: VLF, A(10), DFA(32), σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), and LF. The unconventional form of this ROC plot allows small deviat ions from unity area to be highlighted. The trends exhibited by all six measures are br oadly similar, but VLF, A(10), and DFA(32) exhibit more degradation at shorter data length s than do the other three measures. Thus three measures emerge as superior: LF,σwav(32), and Sτ(1/32). When computation time is taken into account in accordance with th e results provided in Table 2, σwav(32)andSτ(1/32)are the two preferred measures. Fig. 10. Capacity dimension D0as a function of embedding dimension pfor the 12 normal subjects. The three curves shown for each subject correspon d to the original differenced intervals (solid curves), the shuffled surrogates (dashed cu rves), and the phase-randomized surrogates (dotted curves). The dashed curves are quite sim ilar to the solid curves in each panel while the 12 dotted curves closely resemble each other . Fig. 11. Capacity dimension D0as a function of embedding dimension pfor the 12 CHF patients without atrial fibrillation. The three curves show n for each patient correspond to 50the original differenced intervals (solid curves), the shuffl ed surrogates (dashed curves), and the phase-randomized surrogates (dotted curves). The dash ed curves are reasonably similar to the solid curves in most panels while the 12 dotted curves c losely resemble each other. Fig. 12. Capacity dimension D0as a function of embedding dimension pfor the eight patients with other cardiac pathologies. The three curves s hown for each patient correspond to the original differenced intervals (solid curves), the sh uffled surrogates (dashed curves), and the phase-randomized surrogates (dotted curves). The d ashed curves are reasonably similar to the solid curves in most panels while the 8 dotted c urves closely resemble each other. Fig. 13. Simple integrate-and-fire model often used in cardi ology and neurophysiology. A rate function λ(t) is integrated until it reaches a preset threshold θwhereupon a point event is generated and the integrator is reset to zero. Fig. 14. Schematic representation of the jittered integrat e-and-fire model for generating a simulated RR-interval series. An underlying rate process λ(t), assumed to be bandlimited fractal Gaussian noise, is integrated until it reaches a fixe d threshold θ, whereupon a point event is generated. The occurrence time of the point event is jittered in accordance with a Gaussian distribution and the integrator is then reset. Th e continuous rate process is thereby converted into a point process representing the seq uence of R phases in the human heartbeat. Fig. 15. Comparison between data (solid curves) and simulat ions (dotted curves) for a single normal subject (left column, data set n16265), and a s ingle CHF ¯ s AF patient (right column, data set a6796). The parameters E[ τi] (representing the mean interbeat interval) andαW(representing the fractal exponent) used in the simuluatio ns were derived from the data for the two individuals. The normal-subject simulatio n parameters were 1 /λ= 0.74 sec, αS= 1.0,f0= 0.0012 cycles/sec, and σ= 0.022; the CHF-patient simulation parameters were 1/λ= 0.99 sec,αS= 1.5,f0= 0.00055 cycles/sec, and σ= 0.025. The lengths of the simulated data sets were identical to those of the expe rimental records analyzed. (a) RR-interval sequence over the entire data set. Qualitat ive agreement is apparent in both the normal and heart-failure panels. (b) Wavelet-tran sform standard deviation versus scale. The simulations mimic the scaling properties of the d ata in both cases, as well as the gentle flattening of σwavfor the heart-failure patient at small scale values. (c) Int erbeat- interval histogram. The model is satisfactory for the norma l subject but fails to capture the narrowing of the histogram (reduction of σint) for the heart-failure patient. (d) Spectrum of the sequence of RR intervals (the data are displaced upward b y a factor of 102for clarity). The simulations capture the subtleties in the spectra quite well, including the whitening of the heart-failure spectrum at high frequencies. Fig. 16. Individual value plots (jittered integrate-and-fi re simulations) for the 16 mea- sures. Each panel corresponds to a different HRV measure. The three columns in each panel, 51from left to right, comprise data for (1) 12 simulations usin g normal-subject parameters (+), (2) 12 simulations using CHF-patient (¯ s AF) parameters ( ×), and (3) 3 simulations using CHF-patient (¯ c AF) parameters ( △). Each simulation comprises 75821 RR intervals and is carried out using parameters drawn from a single actual data set. The five measures high- lighted in boldface font succeed in completely separating n ormal-subject and CHF-patient (¯ s and ¯ c atrial fibrillation) simulations: VLF,LF,σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), andDFA(32) . Each panel should be compared with the corresponding panel for th e actual normal and CHF data in Fig. 5 (leftmost three columns). Fig. 17. Area under the ROC curve (jittered integrate-and-fi re simulations) as a function of number of RR intervals analyzed ( L) for the 16 HRV measures (mean ±1 S.D.). An area of unity corresponds to perfect separability of the two classe s of simulations. The five measures highlighted in boldface font [ VLF,LF,σwav(32),Sτ(1/32), andDFA(32) ] provide such perfect separability, but only for the largest number of RR i ntervals analyzed. Each panel should be compared with the corresponding panel for the actu al normal and CHF data in Fig. 8. The ROC-area simulations differ from those for the dat a in two principal respects: the performance of the two interval measures SDANN and σintseverely degrades as the number of RR intervals increases, and the performance of the five fractal-exponent measures is substantially enhanced as the number of RR intervals incr eases. Fig. 18. Simulation accuracy for four measures with their co rrelation coefficients ρ. The jittered integrate-and-fire model performs remarkably wel l for the measures Sτ(1/32) and σwav(32); however it does not perform nearly as well for the measu resσintandαW. These disagreements highlight problems with the simple jittered integrate-and-fire model. Fig. 19. Potential modifications to the simple integrate-an d-fire model. Multiple phys- iologically based inputs and adaptive feedback could serve to produce more realistic RR- interval simulations. 52Tables TABLE 1: Detection distances handdfor all 16 HRV measures applied to the 12 normal and 12 CHF records of length Lmax. The measures are listed in order of descending value ofh. The rankings according to ddiffer from those according to h. The wavelet-transform standard deviation σwav(32) and variance σ2 wav(32), though related by a simple monotonic transformation, yield different values of hand have different rankings. Measure h d DFA(32) 2.48253 1.81831 σwav(32) 2.33614 1.70153 A(10) 2.32522 1.77482 VLF 1.84285 1.56551 Sτ(1/32) 1.77422 1.55200 σint 1.74750 1.32475 σ2 wav(32) 1.71343 1.47165 αD 1.64883 1.17679 SDANN 1.46943 1.04079 LF 1.36580 1.28686 pNN50 1.36476 1.20896 LF/HF 1.24507 0.91444 αW 1.09916 0.77800 αR 1.02367 0.72463 HF 0.85361 0.73077 αS 0.82125 0.58071 αA 0.38778 0.27895 53TABLE 2: Computation times (to the nearest 10 msec) for the 16 HRV measures for data sets comprising 75821 RR intervals. The long execution time s for the two DFA measures results from the fact that it is an N2process whereas the 14 other methods are either Nor Nlog(N). Execution Measure Time (msec) VLF, LF, HF, and LF /HF 330 pNN50 40 SDANN 160 σint 190 A(10) 160 σwav(32) 20 Sτ(1/32) 60 DFA(32) 650,090 αD 650,110 αW 220 αS 920 αA 610 αR 570 54TABLE A1: Elementary statistics of the original RR-interva l recordings, before truncation to 75821 RR intervals. File- Number of Recording RR-Interval Mean Rate RR-Interva l name Condition RR Intervals Dur. (sec) Mean (sec) (sec)−1S.D. (sec) n16265 Normal 100460 80061 0.797 1.255 0.171 n16272 ” 93177 84396 0.906 1.104 0.142 n16273 ” 89846 74348 0.828 1.208 0.146 n16420 ” 102081 77761 0.762 1.313 0.101 n16483 ” 104338 76099 0.729 1.371 0.089 n16539 ” 108331 84669 0.782 1.279 0.150 n16773 ” 82160 78141 0.951 1.051 0.245 n16786 ” 101630 84052 0.827 1.209 0.116 n16795 ” 87061 74735 0.858 1.165 0.212 n17052 ” 87548 76400 0.873 1.146 0.159 n17453 ” 100674 74482 0.740 1.352 0.103 nc4 ” 88140 71396 0.810 1.235 0.132 a6796 HF ¯ s AF 75821 71934 0.949 1.054 0.091 a8519 ” 80878 71948 0.890 1.124 0.062 a8679 ” 119094 71180 0.598 1.673 0.051 a9049 ” 92497 71959 0.778 1.285 0.058 a9377 ” 90644 71952 0.794 1.260 0.060 a9435 ” 114959 71158 0.619 1.616 0.034 a9643 ” 148111 71958 0.486 2.058 0.024 a9674 ” 115542 71968 0.623 1.605 0.084 a9706 ” 115064 71339 0.620 1.613 0.100 a9723 ” 115597 71956 0.622 1.607 0.027 a9778 ” 93607 71955 0.769 1.301 0.070 a9837 ” 115205 71944 0.624 1.601 0.066 a7257 HF ¯ c AF 118376 71140 0.601 1.664 0.039 a8552 ” 111826 71833 0.642 1.557 0.062 a8988 ” 118058 71131 0.603 1.660 0.091 tp987 TRANSPLANT 106394 67217 0.632 1.583 0.083 vt973 VT 86992 70044 0.805 1.242 0.202 sd984 SCD 77511 62786 0.810 1.234 0.089 slp59 APNEA 16874 14399 0.853 1.172 0.103 slp66 ” 15751 13199 0.838 1.193 0.103 55Contact Information Malvin C. Teich Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Biome dical Engineering, and Physics, Boston University, 8 Saint Mary’s Street, Boston, Massachu setts 02215-2421, USA Phone: 617-353-1236; Fax: 617-353-1459 E-mail: teich@bu.edu; URL: http://people.bu.edu/teich/ Steven B. Lowen Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Developmental Biopsychiatry Research Program, McLean Hos pital, 115 Mill Street, Bel- mont, Massachusetts 02478, USA E-mail: lowen@mclean.org Bradley M. Jost Air Force Research Laboratory, DELA, 3550 Aberdeen Avenue SE, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117, USA E-mail: bjost@ieee.org Karin Vibe-Rheymer Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, 8 Saint Mary’s Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215-2421, U SA E-mail: kvibe@ieee.org Conor Heneghan, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland E-mail: Conor.Heneghan@ucd.ie References [1] J. R. Levick, An introduction to cardiovascular physiology . London: Butterworths, 1991. [2] R. Kitney, D. Linkens, A. Selman, and A. McDonald, “The in teraction between heart rate and respiration: part II – nonlinear analysis based on c omputer modeling,” Au- tomedica , vol. 4, pp. 141–153, 1982. [3] M. Malik, J. T. Bigger, A. J. Camm, R. E. Kleiger, A. Mallia ni, A. J. Moss, P. J. Schwartz, and the Task Force of the European Society of Cardi ology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, “Heart r ate variability – standards 56of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinic al use,” Euro. Heart J. , vol. 17, pp. 354–381, 1996. Also published in Circulation , vol. 93, pp. 1043–1065, 1996. [4] E. H. Hon and S. T. Lee, “Electronic evaluations of the fet al heart rate patterns preceding fetal death, further observations,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. , vol. 87, pp. 814– 826, 1965. [5] R. E. Kleiger, J. P. Miller, J. T. Bigger, A. J. Moss, and th e Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group, “Decreased heart rate variability and its a ssociation with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction,” Am. J. Cardiol. , vol. 59, pp. 256–262, 1987. [6] J. B. Bassingthwaighte and G. M. Raymond, “Evaluating re scaled range analysis for time series,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. , vol. 22, pp. 432–444, 1994. [7] R. G. Turcott and M. C. Teich, “Long-duration correlatio n and attractor topology of the heartbeat rate differ for healthy patients and those with heart failure,” Proc. SPIE , vol. 2036 (Chaos in Biology and Medicine), pp. 22–39, 1993. [8] R. G. Turcott and M. C. Teich, “Fractal character of the el ectrocardiogram: distin- guishing heart-failure and normal patients,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. , vol. 24, pp. 269–293, 1996. [9] R. W. DeBoer, J. M. Karemaker, and J. Strackee, “Comparin g spectra of a series of point events particularly for heart rate variability data, ”IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. , vol. BME-31, pp. 384–387, 1984. [10] D. R. Cox and P. A. W. Lewis, The Statistical Analysis of Series of Events . London: Methuen, 1966. [11] P. A. W. Lewis, ed., Stochastic Point Processes: Statistical Analysis, Theory , and Applications . New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1972. [12] B. E. A. Saleh, Photoelectron Statistics . New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978. [13] M. C. Teich and S. M. Khanna, “Pulse-number distributio n for the neural spike train in the cat’s auditory nerve,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , vol. 77, pp. 1110–1128, 1985. [14] P. R. Prucnal and M. C. Teich, “Refractory effects in neur al counting processes with exponentially decaying rates,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. , vol. SMC-13, pp. 1028– 1033, 1983. [15] M. C. Teich, C. Heneghan, S. B. Lowen, T. Ozaki, and E. Kap lan, “Fractal character of the neural spike train in the visual system of the cat,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A , vol. 14, pp. 529–546, 1997. 57[16] S. B. Lowen and M. C. Teich, “Estimation and simulation o f fractal stochastic point processes,” Fractals , vol. 3, pp. 183–210, 1995. [17] S. Thurner, S. B. Lowen, M. C. Feurstein, C. Heneghan, H. G. Feichtinger, and M. C. Teich, “Analysis, synthesis, and estimation of fractal-ra te stochastic point processes,” Fractals , vol. 5, pp. 565–595, 1997. [18] W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis . New York: McGraw-Hill, 3rd ed., 1976. [19] B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature . New York: W. H. Freeman, 2nd ed., 1983. [20] J. Feder, Fractals . New York: Plenum, 1988. [21] L. S. Liebovitch, Fractals and Chaos Simplified for the Life Sciences . New York: Oxford, 1998. [22] M. F. Shlesinger and B. J. West, “Complex fractal dimens ion of the bronchial tree,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 67, pp. 2106–2108, 1991. [23] A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes . New York: McGraw-Hill, 3rd ed., 1991. [24] A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer, Discrete-Time Signal Processing . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989. [25] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. F lannery, Numerical Recipes in C. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 1992. [26] S. Akselrod, D. Gordon, F. A. Ubel, D. C. Shannon, A. C. Ba rger, and R. J. Cohen, “Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quanti tative probe of beat to beat cardiovascular control,” Science , vol. 213, pp. 220–222, 1981. [27] B. Pomeranz, R. J. Macaulay, M. A. Caudill, I. Kutz, D. Ad am, D. Gordon, K. M. Kil- born, A. C. Barger, D. C. Shannon, and R. J. Cohen, “Assessmen t of autonomic func- tion in humans by heart rate spectral analysis,” Am. J. Physiol. , vol. 248, pp. H151– H153, 1985. [28] A. Malliani, M. Pagani, F. Lombardi, and S. Cerutti, “Ca rdiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain,” Circulation , vol. 84, pp. 482–492, 1991. [29] M. M. Wolf, G. A. Varigos, D. Hunt, and J. G. Sloman, “Sinu s arrhythmia in acute myocardial infarction,” Med. J. Australia , vol. 2, pp. 52–53, 1978. [30] J. P. Saul, P. Albrecht, R. D. Berger, and R. J. Cohen, “An alysis of long term heart rate variability: methods, 1 /fscaling and implications,” in Computers in Cardiology 1987, pp. 419–422, Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press, 198 8. 58[31] D. R. Cox and V. Isham, Point Processes . London: Chapman and Hall, 1980. [32] S. B. Lowen and M. C. Teich, “The periodogram and Allan va riance reveal fractal exponents greater than unity in auditory-nerve spike train s,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , vol. 99, pp. 3585–3591, 1996. [33] D. W. Allan, “Statistics of atomic frequency standards ,”Proc. IEEE , vol. 54, pp. 221– 230, 1966. [34] J. A. Barnes and D. W. Allan, “A statistical model of flick er noise,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 54, pp. 176–178, 1966. [35] M. C. Teich, “Fractal behavior of the electrocardiogra m: distinguishing heart-failure and normal patients using wavelet analysis,” Proc. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 18, pp. 1128–1129, 1996. [36] M. C. Teich, C. Heneghan, S. B. Lowen, and R. G. Turcott, “ Estimating the fractal exponent of point processes in biological systems using wav elet- and Fourier-transform methods,” in Wavelets in Medicine and Biology (A. Aldroubi and M. Unser, eds.), ch. 14, pp. 383–412, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996. [37] P. Abry and P. Flandrin, “Point processes, long-range d ependence and wavelets,” in Wavelets in Medicine and Biology (A. Aldroubi and M. Unser, eds.), pp. 413–437, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996. [38] C. Heneghan, S. B. Lowen, and M. C. Teich, “Wavelet analy sis for estimating the fractal properties of neural firing patterns,” in Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research 1995 (J. M. Bower, ed.), pp. 441–446, San Diego: Academic Press, 1 996. [39] S. Mallat, “A theory for multiresolution signal decomp osition: the wavelet representa- tion,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. , vol. 11, pp. 674–693, 1989. [40] Y. Meyer, Ondelettes et op´ erateurs . Paris: Hermann, 1990. [41] I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets . Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1992. [42] A. Aldroubi and M. Unser, eds., Wavelets in Medicine and Biology . Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996. [43] M. Akay, ed., Time Frequency and Wavelets in Biomedical Signal Processin g. New York: IEEE Press, 1997. [44] M. Akay, “Wavelet applications in medicine,” IEEE Spectrum , vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 50–56, 1997. 59[45] A. Arneodo, G. Grasseau, and M. Holschneider, “Wavelet transform of multifractals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 61, pp. 2281–2284, 1988. [46] S. Thurner, M. C. Feurstein, and M. C. Teich, “Multireso lution wavelet analysis of heartbeat intervals discriminates healthy patients from t hose with cardiac pathology,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 80, pp. 1544–1547, 1998. [47] S. Thurner, M. C. Feurstein, S. B. Lowen, and M. C. Teich, “Receiver-operating- characteristic analysis reveals superiority of scale-dep endent wavelet and spectral mea- sures for assessing cardiac dysfunction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 81, pp. 5688–5691, 1998. [48] M. C. Teich, “Multiresolution wavelet analysis of hear t rate variability for heart-failure and heart-transplant patients,” Proc. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. , vol. 20, pp. 1136–1141, 1998. [49] C. Heneghan, S. B. Lowen, and M. C. Teich, “Analysis of sp ectral and wavelet-based measures used to assess cardiac pathology,” in Proc. 1999 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , 1999. paper no. SPTM-8.2. [50] Y. Ashkenazy, M. Lewkowicz, J. Levitan, H. Moelgaard, P . E. Bloch Thomsen, and K. Saermark, “Discrimination of the healthy and sick cardia c autonomic nervous sys- tem by a new wavelet analysis of heartbeat intervals,” Fractals , vol. 6, pp. 197–203, 1998. [51] C.-K. Peng, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberge r, “Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartb eat time series,” Chaos , vol. 5, pp. 82–87, 1995. [52] C.-K. Peng, S. Havlin, J. M. Hausdorff, J. Mietus, H. E. St anley, and A. L. Gold- berger, “Fractal mechanisms and heart rate dynamics: long- range correlations and their breakdown with disease,” J. Electrocardiol. , vol. 28, pp. 59–65, 1996. [53] K. K. L. Ho, G. B. Moody, C.-K. Peng, J. E. Mietus, M. G. Lar son, D. Levy, and A. L. Goldberger, “Predicting survival in heart failure case and control subjects by use of fully automated methods for deriving nonlinear and convent ional indices of heart rate dynamics,” Circulation , vol. 96, pp. 842–848, 1997. [54] M. Kobayashi and T. Musha, “1 /ffluctuations of heartbeat period,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. , vol. BME-29, pp. 456–457, 1982. [55] C.-K. Peng, J. Mietus, J. M. Hausdorff, S. Havlin, H. E. St anley, and A. L. Goldberger, “Long-range anticorrelations and non-Gaussian behavior o f the heartbeat,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 70, pp. 1343–1346, 1993. [56] L. A. Nunes Amaral, A. L. Goldberger, P. Ch. Ivanov, and H . E. Stanley, “Scale- independent measures and pathologic cardiac dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 81, pp. 2388–2391, 1998. 60[57] H. E. Hurst, “Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs ,”Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. , vol. 116, pp. 770–808, 1951. [58] W. Feller, “The asymptotic distribution of the range of sums of independent random variables,” Ann. Math. Stat. , vol. 22, pp. 427–432, 1951. [59] H. E. Schepers, J. H. G. M. van Beek, and J. B. Bassingthwa ighte, “Comparison of four methods to estimate the fractal dimension of self-affine signals,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. , vol. 11, pp. 57–64, 1992. [60] J. Beran, Statistics for Long-Memory Processes . New York: Chapman and Hall, 1994. [61] J. B. Bassingthwaighte, L. S. Liebovitch, and B. J. West ,Fractal Physiology . New York: Oxford, 1994. [62] H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I . New York: Wiley, 1968. [63] A. Hald, Statistical Theory with Engineering Applications . New York: Wiley, 1952. [64] D. M. Green and J. A. Swets, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics . Los Altos, CA: Peninsula Press, 1988. [65] J. A. Swets, “Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic syst ems,” Science , vol. 240, pp. 1285–1293, 1988. [66] Y. Ashkenazy, M. Lewkowicz, J. Levitan, S. Havlin, K. Sa ermark, H. Moelgaard, P. E. Bloch Thomsen, M. Moller, U. Hintze, and H. Huikuri, “Sc ale specific and scale independent measures of heart rate variability as ris k indicators,” e-print http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/9909029, 1999. [67] S. V. Buldyrev, A. L. Goldberger, S. Havlin, R. N. Manteg na, M. E. Matsa, C.-K. Peng, M. Simons, and H. E. Stanley, “Long-range correlation properties of coding and noncoding DNA sequences: GenBank analysis,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 51, pp. 5084–5091, 1995. [68] A. L. Goldberger and B. J. West, “Applications of nonlin ear dynamics to clinical cardiology,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. , vol. 504, pp. 195–213, 1987. [69] C.-S. Poon and C. K. Merrill, “Decrease of cardiac chaos in congestive heart failure,” Nature , vol. 389, pp. 492–495, 1997. [70] J. K. Kanters, N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou, and E. Agner, “L ack of evidence for low- dimensional chaos in heart rate variability,” J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. , vol. 5, pp. 591–601, 1994. 61[71] D. E. Roach and R. S. Sheldon, “Information scaling prop erties of heart rate variabil- ity,”Am. J. Physiol. , vol. 274, pp. H1970–H1978, 1998. [72] J. Theiler, “Estimating fractal dimension,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A , vol. 7, pp. 1055–1073, 1990. [73] L. S. Liebovitch and T. T´ oth, “A fast algorithm to deter mine fractal dimensions by box counting,” Phys. Lett. A , vol. 141, pp. 386–390, 1989. [74] M. Ding, C. Grebogi, E. Ott, T. Sauer, and J. A. Yorke, “Pl ateau onset for correlation dimension: when does it occur?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 70, pp. 3872–3875, 1993. [75] P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, “Measuring the strang eness of strange attractors,” Physica D , vol. 9, pp. 189–208, 1983. [76] L. S. Liebovitch, “Introduction to the properties and a nalysis of fractal objects, pro- cesses, and data,” in Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling (V. Z. Mar- marelis, ed.), vol. 2, pp. 225–239, New York: Plenum Press, 1 989. [77] A. Wolf, J. B. Swift, H. L. Swinney, and J. A. Vastano, “De termining Lyapunov exponents from a time series,” Physica D , vol. 16, pp. 285–317, 1985. [78] A. R. Osborne and A. Provenzale, “Finite correlation di mension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra,” Physica D , vol. 35, pp. 357–381, 1989. [79] S. J. Schiff and T. Chang, “Differentiation of linearly co rrelated noise from chaos in a biologic system using surrogate data,” Biol. Cybern. , vol. 67, pp. 387–393, 1992. [80] J. Theiler, S. Eubank, A. Longtin, B. Galdrikian, and J. D. Farmer, “Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data,” Physica D , vol. 58, pp. 77– 94, 1992. [81] A. M. Albano, J. Muench, C. Schwartz, A. I. Mees, and P. E. Rapp, “Singular- value decomposition and the Grassberger-Procaccia algori thm,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 38, pp. 3017–3026, 1988. [82] C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, “Chaos, strange attr actors, and fractal basin boundaries in nonlinear dynamics,” Science , vol. 238, pp. 632–638, 1987. [83] F. X. Witkowski, K. M. Kavanagh, P. A. Penkoske, R. Plons ey, M. L. Spano, W. L. Ditto, and D. T. Kaplan, “Evidence for determinism in ventri cular fibrillation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 75, pp. 1230–1233, 1995. [84] A. Garfinkel, J. N. Weiss, W. L. Ditto, and M. L. Spano, “Ch aos control of cardiac arrhythmias,” Trends Cardiovasc. Med. , vol. 5, pp. 76–80, 1995. 62[85] C. Heneghan, S. M. Khanna, ˚A. Flock, M. Ulfendahl, L. Brundin, and M. C. Teich, “Investigating the nonlinear dynamics of cellular motion i n the inner ear using the short-time Fourier and continuous wavelet transforms,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process- ing, vol. 42, pp. 3335–3352, 1994. [86] M. C. Teich, C. Heneghan, S. M. Khanna, ˚A. Flock, M. Ulfendahl, and L. Brundin, “Investigating routes to chaos in the guinea-pig cochlea us ing the continuous wavelet transform and the short-time Fourier transform,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. , vol. 23, pp. 583– 607, 1995. [87] M. C. Teich, C. Heneghan, and S. M. Khanna, “Analysis of c ellular vibrations in the living cochlea using the continuous wavelet transform a nd the short-time Fourier transform,” in Time Frequency and Wavelets in Biomedical Engineering (M. Akay, ed.), pp. 243–269, New York: IEEE Press, 1997. [88] D. J. Christini and J. J. Collins, “Controlling nonchao tic neuronal noise using chaos control techniques,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 75, pp. 2782–2785, 1995. [89] H. C. Tuckwell, Stochastic Processes in the Neurosciences . Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1989. [90] R. D. Berger, S. Akselrod, D. Gordon, and R. J. Cohen, “An efficient algorithm for spectral analysis of heart rate variability,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. , vol. BME-33, pp. 900–904, 1986. [91] B. W. Hyndman and R. K. Mohn, “A pulse modulator model for pacemaker activity,” inDigest 10th Int. Conf. Med. Biol. Eng. , (Dresden, Germany), p. 223, 1973. [92] B. W. Hyndman and R. K. Mohn, “Model of the cardiac pacema ker and its use in decoding the information content of cardiac intervals,” Automedica , vol. 1, pp. 239– 252, 1975. [93] O. Rompelman, J. B. I. M. Snijders, and C. J. van Spronsen , “The measurement of heart rate variability spectra with the help of a personal co mputer,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. , vol. BME-29, pp. 503–510, 1982. [94] P. Flandrin, “Wavelet analysis and synthesis of fracti onal Brownian motion,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory , vol. 38, pp. 910–917, 1992. [95] B. B. Mandelbrot, “A fast fractional Gaussian noise gen erator,” Water Resources Res. , vol. 7, pp. 543–553, 1971. [96] T. Lundahl, W. J. Ohley, S. M. Kay, and R. Siffert, “Fracti onal Brownian motion: A maximum likelihood estimator and its application to image texture,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. , vol. 5, pp. 152–161, 1986. 63[97] M. A. Stoksik, R. G. Lane, and D. T. Nguyen, “Accurate syn thesis of fractional Brow- nian motion using wavelets,” Electron. Lett. , vol. 30, pp. 383–384, 1994. [98] S. B. Lowen, S. S. Cash, M.-m. Poo, and M. C. Teich, “Quant al neurotransmitter secretion rate exhibits fractal behavior,” J. Neurosci. , vol. 17, pp. 5666–5677, 1997. [99] S. B. Lowen and M. C. Teich, “Fractal renewal processes g enerate 1/fnoise,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 47, pp. 992–1001, 1993. [100] S. B. Lowen and M. C. Teich, “Fractal renewal processes ,”IEEE Trans. Inform. The- ory, vol. 39, pp. 1669–1671, 1993. [101] S. B. Lowen and M. C. Teich, “Fractal auditory-nerve fir ing patterns may derive from fractal switching in sensory hair-cell ion channels,” in Noise in Physical Systems and 1/fFluctuations (P. H. Handel and A. L. Chung, eds.), pp. 781–784, New York: American Institute of Physics, 1993. AIP Conference Procee dings 285. [102] L. S. Liebovitch and T. I. T´ oth, “Using fractals to und erstand the opening and closing of ion channels,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. , vol. 18, pp. 177–194, 1990. 64/(a/)/(b/) //9 //8 //7 //6 //5 //4 //3 //2 //1/(c/)N/3 /= /2 N/2 /= /3 N/1 /= /3/(d/)INTER V AL NUMBER i/ i/-x /6 / /( x /)/0 /1 /= /2/1/BnZr /1 /+/1/-x /6 /(/1 /= /4/) / /( x/= /1/6 /BnZr /3/)/4/8 /5/6 /6/4/BnZr /1 /= /4 /+/1 /= /4/-i /6 /(/1 /= /4/) /i / /( i/= /1/6 /BnZr /3/)/4/8 /5/6 /6/4/BnZr /1 /= /4 /+/1 /= /4r r r r r r rrrrrr r rrrr r r r r r/(a/) /(b/) /(c/)This figure "fig03a.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0008016v1This figure "fig03b.gif" is available in "gif" format from: http://arXiv.org/ps/physics/0008016v1HEAR T F AILURE / c AF HEAR T F AILURE / s AF NORMALW A VELET SCALE m/ w a v/( m /)/1/0 /3/1/0 /2/1/0 /1 /1/0 /0/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2INDIVIDUAL V ALUES/: D A T AMEASURED V ALUE VLF LF HF LF /= HF/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /1/1/0 /0/1/0 /BnZr /1pNN/5/0 SD ANN /in t /= SDNN A /(/1/0/)/1/0 /0/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3 /1/0 /BnZr /1 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/w a v /(/3/2/) S/ /(/1 /= /3/2/) DF A/(/3/2/) /D/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /2/1/0/W /S /A /R/2/1/0 /2/1/0 /2/1/0 /2/1/0CONDITIONNORMALCHF / s AF CHF / c AF TRANSPLANTVTSCDAPNEAPREDICTIVE V ALUES/: NORMAL AND CHF D A T APREDICTIVE V ALUE VLF LF HF LF /= HF/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/./0/0/./5/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5/1/0 /1/1/0 /0/1/0 /BnZr /1pNN/5/0 SD ANN /in t /= SDNN A /(/1/0/)/1/0 /0/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3 /1/./0/0/./5/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/w a v /(/3/2/) S/ /(/1 /= /3/2/) DF A/(/3/2/) /D/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /1/./0/0/./5/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/2 /1 /0/W /S /A /R/2 /1 /0 /1/./0/0/./5/2 /1 /0 /2 /1 /0 /2 /1 /0THRESHOLDR OC CUR VES/: NORMAL AND CHF D A T ASENSITIVITY VLF /1/./0/0/./5/0/./0 LF HF LF /= HFpNN/5/0 /1/./0/0/./5/0/./0 SD ANN /in t /= SDNN A /(/1/0/)/w a v /(/3/2/) /1/./0/0/./5/0/./0 S/ /(/1 /= /3/2/) DF A/(/3/2/) /D/W/1/./0 /0/./5 /0/./0 /1/./0/0/./5/0/./0 /S/1/./0 /0/./5 /0/./0 /A/1/./0 /0/./5 /0/./0 /R/1/./0 /0/./5 /0/./0/1 /BnZr SPECIFICITYR OC/-AREA CUR VES/: NORMAL AND CHF D A T AR OC AREA VLF /1/./0/0/./8/0/./6LF HF LF /= HFpNN/5/0 /1/./0/0/./8/0/./6SD ANN /in t /= SDNN A /(/1/0/)/w a v /(/3/2/) /1/./0/0/./8/0/./6S/ /(/1 /= /3/2/) DF A/(/3/2/) /D/W/1/0 /5/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2 /1/./0/0/./8/0/./6 /S/1/0 /5/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2 /A/1/0 /5/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2 /R/1/0 /5/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2D A T A LENGTH ANAL YZED LLF S/ /(/1 /= /3/2/) /w a v /(/3/2/) DF A/(/3/2/) A /(/1/0/) VLFD A T A LENGTH ANAL YZED L/1 /BnZr R OC AREA/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4NORMALCAP A CITY DIMENSION D /0 /4/2/0/4/2/0/6 /4 /2 /4/2/0/6 /4 /2 /6 /4 /2 /6 /4 /2EMBEDDING DIMENSION pORIGINAL D A T A SHUFFLED /(MEAN / /1 S/.D/./) PHASE/-RANDOMIZEDHEAR T F AILURE / s AFCAP A CITY DIMENSION D /0 /4/2/0/4/2/0/6 /4 /2 /4/2/0/6 /4 /2 /6 /4 /2 /6 /4 /2EMBEDDING DIMENSION pORIGINAL D A T A SHUFFLED /(MEAN / /1 S/.D/./) PHASE/-RANDOMIZEDOTHER P A THOLOGIESCAP A CITY DIMENSION D /0HF / c AF HF / c AF HF / c AF TRANSPLANT/6 /4 /2 /4/2/0/6 /4 /2 /6 /4 /2 /6 /4 /2VT SCD APNEA APNEA/6 /4 /2 /4/2/0/6 /4 /2 /6 /4 /2 /6 /4 /2EMBEDDING DIMENSION pORIGINAL D A T A SHUFFLED /(MEAN / /1 S/.D/./) PHASE/-RANDOMIZEDRESETINTEGRATORTHRESHOLD DETECTORFRACTAL NOISE RESETINTEGRATORTHRESHOLD DETECTORJITTERSIMULATED RR-INTERVAL SERIESNORMAL HEAR T F AILURE/(a/)SIM/.D A T AINTER V AL NUMBER i/ i/(sec/)/6/0/0/0/0 /4/0/0/0/0 /2/0/0/0/0 /0 /1/./0/0/./5/1/./0/0/./5/0 SIM/.D A T AINTER V AL NUMBER i /6/0/0/0/0 /4/0/0/0/0 /2/0/0/0/0 /0/(b/) SCALE m/ w a v/= SDNN/1/0 /3/1/0 /2/1/0 /1 /1/0 /0/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2SCALE m /1/0 /3/1/0 /2/1/0 /1/(c/)RR INTER V AL / /(sec/)p //( / /)/1/./4 /1/./2 /1 /0/./8 /0/./6 /0/./4 /6/4/2/0RR INTER V AL / /(sec/) /1/./4 /1/./2 /1 /0/./8 /0/./6 /0/./4/(d/)SIMULA TION D A T A /( / /1/0 /2/)FREQUENCY f /(cycles//in terv al/)S //( f /)/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4 /1/0 /8/1/0 /6/1/0 /4/1/0 /2 SIMULA TION D A T A /( / /1/0 /2/)FREQUENCY f /(cycles//in terv al/) /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4INDIVIDUAL V ALUES/: SIMULA TIONMEASURED V ALUE VLF LF HF LF /= HF/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /1/1/0 /0/1/0 /BnZr /1pNN/5/0 SD ANN /in t /= SDNN A /(/1/0/)/1/0 /0/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3 /1/0 /BnZr /1 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2/w a v /(/3/2/) S/ /(/1 /= /3/2/) DF A/(/3/2/) /D/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /2/1/0/W /S /A /R/2/1/0 /2/1/0 /2/1/0 /2/1/0CONDITIONNORMALCHF / s AF CHF / c AFR OC/-AREA CUR VES/: SIMULA TIONR OC AREA VLF /1/./0/0/./8/0/./6LF HF LF /= HFpNN/5/0 /1/./0/0/./8/0/./6SD ANN /in t /= SDNN A /(/1/0/)/w a v /(/3/2/) /1/./0/0/./8/0/./6S/ /(/1 /= /3/2/) DF A/(/3/2/) /D/W/1/0 /5/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2 /1/./0/0/./8/0/./6 /S/1/0 /5/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2 /A/1/0 /5/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2 /R/1/0 /5/1/0 /4/1/0 /3/1/0 /2SIMULA TED D A T A LENGTH ANAL YZED LSIMULA TION A CCURA CY/in t /= SDNN S/ /(/1 /= /3/2/)/ /= /0 /: /7/1SIMULA TION/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 / /= /0 /: /9/9/1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5 /1/0 /BnZr /2/1/0 /BnZr /3/1/0 /BnZr /4/1/0 /BnZr /5/w a v /(/3/2/) /W/ /= /0 /: /9/9/1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 /1/0 /BnZr /1/1/0 /BnZr /2 / /= /0 /: /7/1/2 /1 /0 /2/1/0D A T AHEAR T F AILURE / c AF HEAR T F AILURE / s AF NORMAL / /= /0 /: /7/1FRACTAL NOISE INTEGRATORTHRESHOLD DETECTORSIMULATED RR-INTERVAL SERIES ADAPTIVE FILTERRESPIRATION WHITE NOISEBLOOD PRESSURE RESET

arXiv:physics/0008017v1 [physics.atom-ph] 7 Aug 2000Inelastic Collisions of Ultracold Polar Molecules John L. Bohn∗ JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and Un iversity of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0440 (February 2, 2008) The collisional stability of ultracold polar molecules in electrostatic traps is considered. Rate constants for coll isions that drive molecules from weak-field-seeking to strong-fiel d- seeking states are estimated using a simple model. The rates are found to be quite large, of order 10−12-10−10cm3/sec, and moreover to grow rapidly in an externally applied elec- tric field. It is argued that these results are generic for po- lar molecules, and that therefore polar molecules should be trapped by other than electrostatic means. Recently Bethlem et al. broadened the scope of ultra- cold AMO physics by cooling and electrostatically trap- ping ND 3molecules [1,2]. This achievement is notable both for the complexity of the species trapped and for the generality of the Stark slowing technique, which could in principle cool any polar molecule. This technique is therefore now on a par with other experimental methods for producing cold molecular gases, such as photoassoci- ation [3] and buffer-gas cooling [4], as well as photopro- duction of molecular ions in a Paul trap [5]. The electrostatic trap demonstrated in Ref. [2] raises anew questions of collisional stability that are familiar i n the context of magnetic trapping of atoms [6]. An elec- trostatic trap can only confine dipoles that are in their weak-field seeking states, since Maxwell’s equations per- mit a local field minimum but not a field maximum. Thus the dipoles are succeptible to orientation-changing colli - sions that populate the strong-field seeking, untrapped states. In the case of magnetic trapping of alkali atoms a standard remedy against collisional losses is to pre- pare the atoms in their stretched spin states, whereby the dominant spin-exchange collisional processes are ab- sent. Atomic spins can then only change their orientation via spin-spin dipolar processes, which are weak because of the inherent weakness of magnetic dipolar interactions. The purpose of this Rapid Communication is to point out that polar molecules are not as immune to dipolar re- laxation as are magnetic atoms, simply because electric dipoles have a much stronger interaction. Indeed, the force between a pair of d= 1 Debye (0.39 atomic units) electric dipoles is ∼3×103times larger than that between a pair of µ= 1µBmagnetic dipoles. The basic physics of electric dipolar relaxation lies in the competition be- tween the dipoles’ interaction with the electric field when they are far apart, −/vectord·/vectorE, and with each other when they are closer together, ∼/vectord1·/vectord2/R3. At small values of in- termolecular separation Rthe dipoles will tend to lockon their intermolecular axis rather than on the lab-fixed axis set by /vectorE; the competition between these tendencies scrambles the orientation of the molecular dipoles. The resulting state-changing collisions can in principle be su p- pressed by a field strong enough to maintain the dipolar orientation. This will happen, roughly, if dE> d2/R3 for small values of R. Still, for d= 1 Debye dipoles at a typical collision distance R≈10 atomic units (a.u.), an electric field of 106V/cm would be required to main- tain dipolar orientation. Thus very large laboratory fields may exert some mitigating influence, but are unlikely to arrest relaxation altogether. To quantify this general argument this paper presents detailed calculations using a simplified model of colli- sions. In general the physics of cold molecular colli- sions will be quite complex, intertwining rotational, elec - tronic, nuclear spin, and perhaps even vibrational de- grees of freedom. However, to establish orders of magni- tude for dipolar relaxation rate constants it suffices to focus on orientational degrees of freedom, and to ac- count only for the dominant dipole-dipole interaction be- tween molecules. Accordingly, a simplified “toy” model is used here, which has zero spin and nuclear spin. The molecules are assumed to be diatomic rigid rotors with electric dipole moments d= 1 Debye along their molec- ular axes. The electronic ground state of the molecules is assumed to be1Π, so that it possesses a Λ-doublet of parity eigenstates. The splitting of this doublet is as- sumed to have a “typical” value of ∆ = 10−3cm−1, and the lower-energy state is assumed to have even parity. At ultracold temperatures and in zero electric field the molecules occupy parity eigenstates, hence exhibit no permanent dipole moment. The dipole moments only become apparent when the field is large enough to sig- nificantly mix states of different parity, thus “activat- ing” the dipoles. This occurs at a field value where the Stark effect transforms from quadratic to linear, at ≈100 V/cm in the present model (Figure 1). For fields below this value the molecules are fairly weakly interacting, whereas above this value the molecules have extremely strong dipole couplings. Thus in the Λ-doubled state col- lisions can be manipulated using modest electric fields, in contrast to the ∼105V/cm fields required to influence cold atomic collisions [7]. These arguments also apply to molecules with2S+1Σ electronic symmetry when S >0 and the molecule exhibits an Ω-doubling [8], as well as to ND 3. Figure 1 shows the electric field dependence of the lowest-lying energy levels in the model molecules. Al- though both N= 1 and N= 2 rotational levels are 1shown, the calculations below focus exclusively on the N= 1 levels. Their low- Ebehavior is shown in the inset, labeled by the pair of quantum numbers |MN|, p. Here p stands for the parity in zero field, while |MN|denotes the magnitude of the molecular rotation’s magnetic quantum number referred to the laboratory axis; the MN= 1 and MN=−1 levels are degenerate even in an electric field. In an electrostatic trap of the kind used by Bethlem et al. the trapped states are the weak-field seekers, i.e., those whose Stark energy rises with rising field. These are the ||MN|, p∝angbracketright=|1,−∝angbracketrightstates in the model. The Hamiltonian for collisions between the molecules consists of four terms in this model, ˆH=ˆT+ˆHfs+ˆHfield+ˆHdip−dip. (1) Here ˆTrepresents the kinetic energy, ˆHfsthe molecular fine structure including the Λ-doubling, and the last two terms are the electric field interaction and the dipole- dipole interaction between molecules: ˆHfield=−(/vectord1+/vectord2)·/vectorE, (2) ˆHdip−dip=/vectord1·/vectord2−3(ˆR·/vectord1)(ˆR·/vectord2) R3, (3) where ˆRdenotes the orientation of the vector joining the centers-of-mass of the molecules. Dispersion and ex- change potentials are neglected here since they are of sec- ondary importance to dipolar interactions at large R. To avoid problems with the singularity of 1 /R3atR= 0, vanishing boundary conditions are imposed at a cutoff radius R0= 10 a.u., where the potentials are deep com- pared to ∆. In the scattering calculation the molecules are assumed to be identical bosons, so that only even partial waves are relevant. Only the partial waves L= 0 and L= 2 are included explicitly, even though in principle all partial waves are coupled together by strong anisotropic interac- tions. However, the neglected higher- Lpartial waves can be shown, in the Born approximation, to fall off rapidly withL[9,10]. Cross sections for processes that change molecular channel |i∝angbracketrightinto channel |i′∝angbracketrightare given as in Ref. [11]: σi→i′=π k2 i/summationdisplay LM LL′M′ L|∝angbracketlefti, LM L|T|i′L′M′ L∝angbracketright|2, (4) where Tis the T-matrix for scattering and kiis the inci- dent wave number. Because of the incoherent sum in (4), contributions arising from L= 0 and L= 2 incident par- tial waves can be presented individually. All results, for both elastic and state-changing collisions will be reporte d as event rate coefficients, Ki→i′=viσi→i′, (5) where viis the incident relative velocity of the collision partners.Although state-changing collisions are primarily of in- terest here, it is useful first to consider elastic scatterin g of polar molecules, to illustrate the enormous influence of the electric field. Figure 2 shows the elastic scat- tering rate constant Kelfor molecules in their |MN, p∝angbracketright =|1,−∝angbracketrightstate. Figure 2(a) depicts the low-field limit (E= 0 V/cm), while Fig. 2(b) shows a higher-field limit (E= 200 V/cm), where the Stark effect is linear. These rate constants are separated into their s-wave (solid line) and d-wave (dashed line) contributions. In both the low- and high-field regimes the s-wave rate has the familiar Kel∝E1/2threshold behavior as a func- tion of collision energy E, arising from the Wigner thresh- old law. For the d-waves, however, the threshold depen- dence changes dramatically, falling off as Kel∝E5/2at low field but as Kel∝E1/2at higher fields. This be- havior has to do with qualitative differences in the long- range intermolecular potentials. In the low-field limit, the asymptotic molecular states are parity eigenstates, hence have no dipole moment. At large values of R, where the dipole-dipole interaction energy becomes less than the Λ-doubling energy, the dipole-dipole 1 /R3po- tential is thus effectively absent. By contrast, in the high- field regime parity eigenstates are mixed at large Rand the 1/R3potential is activated. It is well known [12,13] that a 1 /R3potential contributes a long-range scattering phase shift that is proportional to the wave number k forallpartial waves L >0, thus yielding a Kel∝E1/2 threshold law. This “switching on” of the dipolar interaction in the presence of a field also manifests itself in the inelastic rat e constants, which are shown in Figure 3. This figure shows the sum Krelax=/summationtext i′Ki→i′of all the rate constants for collisions of |MN, p∝angbracketright=|+1,−∝angbracketrightmolecules in which at least one molecule relaxes into one of the strong-field-seeking states ||MN|, p∝angbracketright=|0,−∝angbracketright,|0,+∝angbracketright, or|1,+∝angbracketright(see Fig. 1). Again both the E= 0 V/cm and E= 200 V/cm cases are shown, and the rates are separated into L= 0 and L= 2 initial states. These relaxation rates are domi- nated by exothermic processes which exhibit their own characteristic threshold behavior. The rates for L= 0 partial waves become independent of energy at thresh- old, while the behavior of L= 2 partial waves transforms from the usual Wigner result Krelax∝E2at low field, to aKrelax∝Ebehavior at high field when the dipoles are activated [14]. More significantly, the values of the loss rate constant are substantially boosted by the presence of an electric field, even for s-wave collisions. This is simply because the strong dipolar interactions that drive inelastic tran- sitions are also made stronger in an electric field. Figure 4 shows the threshold relaxation rate as a function of electric field. Even at low field the rates are fairly large, since dipole interactions are still present at small R. As the field grows to E ∼100 V/cm, where the dipoles turn on, the rates rise sharply. In the particular model con- sidered here the rates are boosted nearly two orders of magnitude by the field. 2Weak-electric-field seeking states should quite gener- ally suffer these large loss rates. Quantum mechanically this follows from the fact that the large- RHamiltonian ˆHfs+ˆHfieldis diagonal in the laboratory frame, while the interaction Hamiltonian ˆHdip−dipis diagonal in the body frame that joins the centers-of-mass of the two molecules. The former is stronger at large separations R, while the latter dominates at small R. Molecules that start out in eigenstates of ˆHfs+ˆHfieldare thus distributed over all the different states of ˆHdip−dipduring the collision, and re- assembled into an assortment of eigenstates of ˆHfs+ˆHfield as the molecules separate. Since the asymptotic states are completely deconstructed and reconstructed during this collision, in general it is expected that the probabil- ity for inelastic scattering is roughly the same as that for elastic scattering, and that therefore the rates are com- parable. This is of course the same kind of physics that gov- erns spin-exchange collisions in the alkali atoms, which are driven by the competition between hyperfine-plus- magnetic field interactions at large R, and exchange po- tentials at small R[15]. In the case of alkali atoms it is possible that the short-range phase shifts, from singlet and triplet total electronic spin states, can interfere in such a way as to eliminate probabilities for inelastic pro- cesses [16]. For molecules this coincidence seems unlikely , however, since there are are many degrees of freedom at short range, all of which would have to contribute nearly identical scattering phase shifts in order cancel loss rate s. In conclusion, dipolar molecules electrostatically trapped in weak-field-seeking states are succeptible to state-changing collisions that can rapidly deplete the trapped gas. Moreover, these rates can grow in the pres- ence of the trapping electric field, which effectively turns on the full dipolar coupling at large intermolecular sepa- ration. Although this conclusion has been demonstrated using a particular toy model, the physics is quite gen- eral and should apply to any polar species. It is there- fore recommended that dipolar molecules be trapped in strong-field-seeking states, where inelastic channels are absent at low temperatures. This kind of trapping cannot be achieved in a static trap, but would require a time- varying electric field. Magnetic dipoles in strong-field seeking states have indeed been confined in such traps, using either time-varying fields [17] or microwave cavi- ties [18]. A more conventional magnetic trap may also be useful, although the influence of the electric dipoles on losses in magnetic traps would have to be explored. More broadly, an externally applied electric field is seen to have a profound influence on the collision dynamics of ultracold polar molecules, even to the extent of altering the threshold behavior. Preliminary results on the prop- erties of quantum degenerate gases with dipolar inter- actions have been reported in the literature [9,19]. More detailed scattering calculations are required to help shap e the study of these unusual substances [10]. This work was supported by the National ScienceFoundation. I acknowledge useful discussions with E. Cornell and C. Greene. ∗Electronic address: bohn@murphy.colorado.edu [1] H. L. Bethlem, G. Berden, A. J. van Roij, F. M. H. Crompvoets, and G. Meijer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5744 (2000). [2] H. L. Bethlem, G. Berden, F. M. H. Crompvoets, R. T. Jongma, A. J. A. van Roij, and G. Meijer, Nature 406, 491 (2000). [3] A. Fioretti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4402 (1998); T. Takekoshi, B. M. Patterson, and R. J. Knize, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5105 (1998); A. N. Nikolov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 703 (1999); R. Wynar et al., Science 287, 1016 (2000). [4] J. D. Weinstein et al., Nature (London) 395, 148 (1998). [5] K. Mølhave and M. Drewsen, Phys. Rev. A 62, 011401 (2000). [6] A. Lagendijk, I. F. Silvera, and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. B33, 626 (1986). [7] M. Marinescu and L. You, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4596 (1999). [8] D. DeMille et al., Phys. Rev. A 61, 052507 (2000). [9] S. Yi and L. You, Phys. Rev. A 61, 041604 (2000). [10] J. L. Bohn, unpublished. [11] J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev. A. 62, 032701 (2000). [12] R. Shakeshaft, J. Phys. B 5, L115 (1972). [13] H. R. Sadeghpour et al., J. Phys. B 33, R93 (2000). [14] N. F. Mott and H. S. W. Massey, The Theory of Atomic Collisions (Oxford, The Clarendon Press, third ed., 1965), p. 403. [15] H. T. C. Stoof, J. M. V. A. Koelman, and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. B 38, 4688 (1988). [16] S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, H. M. J. M. Boesten, and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. A 55, R1589; P. S. Julienne, F. H. Mies, E. Tiesinga, and C. J. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1880 (1997); J. P. Burke, Jr., J. L. Bohn, B. D. Esry, and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 55, R2511 (1997). [17] E. A. Cornell, C. Monroe, and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 2439 (1991). [18] R. J. C. Spreeuw et al., Phys. Rev. A 72, 3162 (1994). [19] K. G´ oral, K. Rz¸ a˙ zewski, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. A 61, 051601(R), (2000). 301x1052x1053x1054x1055x105-16-12-8-404812 |MN|,p 0,- 0,+1,- 1,+N=1N=2Energy/kB (K) Electric Field (V/cm)01002003002.8762.8802.884 FIG. 1. Stark energy levels for the model molecules, which have1Π electronic symmetry. This paper concentrates on collisions between molecules in their |MN, p∝angbracketright=|+1,−∝angbracketrightstates, which are weak-field seekers (see inset). 10-610-510-410-310-1510-1210-9 = 200 V/cm/G28(b) L=0 L=2Kel (cm3/sec) Collsion Energy E/kB (K)10-610-510-410-310-1510-1210-9 = 0 V/cm/G28(a) L=0 L=2FIG. 2. Elastic scattering rate constants for |MN, p∝angbracketright =|+ 1,−∝angbracketrightmolecules. Shown are results for low-field [E= 0 V/cm in (a)] and high-field [ E= 200 V/cm in (b)] regimes. Notice that in the presence of an electric field the d-wave ( L= 2) rate is significantly boosted, and acquires a Kel∝E1/2threshold behavior. 10-610-510-410-310-1510-1210-9 = 200 V/cm/G28(b) L=0 L=2Krelax (cm3/sec) Collision Energy E/kB (K)10-610-510-410-310-1510-1210-9 = 0 V/cm/G28(a) L=0 L=2 FIG. 3. Dipolar relaxation rate constants for |MN, p∝angbracketright =|+ 1,−∝angbracketrightmolecules, at the same field values as in Fig. 2. The rates are substantially higher in the presence of an electric field, as explained in the text. 40 100 200 30010-1210-1110-1010-9Krelax (cm 3/sec) Electric Field (V/cm) FIG. 4. Electric field dependence of the total relaxation rates for molecules initially in their |MN, p∝angbracketright=|+ 1,−∝angbracketrightstate, in the zero-collision-energy limit. These rates rise sharp ly by E= 100 V/cm, where the molecular dipoles are “activated” by a suitable admixture of parity eigenstates. 5

arXiv:physics/0008018 8 Aug 2000 1SLAC-PUB-8465 20 July 2000 Recent Advances in Electron and Positron Sources* J.E. Clendenin Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford, CA 94309 Abstract Recent advances in electron and positron sources have resulted in new capabilities driven in most cases by the increasing demands of advanced accelerating systems. Electron sources for brighter beams and for high average-current beams are described. The status and remaining challenges for polarized electron beams are also discussed. For positron sources, recent activity in the development of polarized positron beams for future colliders is reviewed. Finally, a new proposal for combining laser cooling with beam polarization is presented. Invited talk presented at The 9th Workshop on Advanced Accelerator Concepts Sante Fe, NM 10-16 June 2000 *Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF00515.2Recent Advances in Electron and Positron Sources* J.E. Clendenin Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford, CA 94309 Abstract. Recent advances in electron and positron sources have resulted in new capabilities driven in most cases by the increasing demands of advanced accelerating systems. Electron sources for brighter beams and for high average-current beams are described. The status and remaining challenges for polarized electron beams are also discussed. For positron sources, recent activity in the development of polarized positron beams for future colliders is reviewed. Finally, a new proposal for combining laser cooling with beam polarization is presented. ELECTRON SOURCES Throughout the long history of electron sources, the standard and virtually universal configuration of the dc-biased gun has been a coaxial design with a ceramic high- voltage insulating tube providing the outside vacuum envelope and inside, supporting the cathode, a metal tube at atmospheric pressure as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). This design works well in practice, but the insulator is large, and the outside of the ceramic is subject to contamination from the atmosphere, which can lead to excessive leakage current. With the advent of polarized electron sources, various vacuum components associated with installing cathodes under vacuum are typically attached to the high- voltage flange, leading to an awkwardly large high-voltage assemblage [ 1]. These problems are solved for photocathode dc-biased guns by inverting the structure to have a smaller-diameter ceramic tube inside a larger metal vacuum chamber as shown in Fig. 1(b). The earliest such designs were developed in the early 1990s at SLAC [ 2] and independently at Novosibirsk [ 3]. The SLAC design was built and successfully tested at high voltage but has not yet been used to produce electrons. Variations on the basic idea include the double insulator design, Fig. 1(c), used at Amsterdam [ 4] and under development at Nagoya [ 5], and variations on the high-voltage connection, Fig. 1(d), as used at Mainz [ 6] and Bonn [ 7]. For a pulsed high-voltage gun, the Fig. 1(b) design looks most promising. The past decade has seen the rapid development of photocathode rf guns [ 8]. These guns are especially well-suited as high-brightness sources. Since the emittance requirements of future colliders seems beyond the reach of any rf photoinjector design, the need for high-brightness rf guns comes mostly from free electron laser (FEL) *Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF00515.3Insulator C e– A(a) HVPS C e– A(b) HVPS Secondary VacuumVacuumInsulator C e– A(c) Insulator C e– AInsulator (d) HVPS /BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr/BnZr yyyyyyyyy HVPS 6-2000 8547A1 /BnZr/BnZr yy FIGURE 1 . The inverted structure (IS) design and variations: (a) the conventional non-inverted design; (b) the original IS design; (c) the double insulator design; and (d) variation on connecting the high-voltage power supply (HVPS). For the IS design, the cathode (C) and anode (A) electrodes are permanent, while the photocathode (not separately shown) is removable. developments. As an example, the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) requires a 1- nC, 100-A beam from the photoinjector with a normalized rms transverse emittance, εn,rms, of 1 µm [9]. The emittance growth in an rf photoinjector is mostly correlated. Special techniques have been developed to reverse this growth and then lock-in the resulting emittance minimum just as the beam becomes relativistic. Experimentally the lowest emittance for an LCLS type beam is εn,rms~2 µm [10,11 ]. However, these measurements were done with a spatially uniform but temporally Gaussian charge distribution. Simulations using PARMELA, a multi-particle tracking code, indicate that if the temporal distribution is also uniform, εn,rms~1 µm should be achievable. Progress in exploring the relevant parameter space has been facilitated by the recent development of a semi-analytic code, HOMDYN [ 12]. Using newly discovered matching conditions [13], simulations now predict an emittance for an LCLS type beam of close to εn,rms~0.5 µm (thermal effects included) at 150 MeV [14]. See Fig. 2. The possibility of achieving even higher brightness using a pulsed diode-structure photocathode gun with GV/m level fields was first reported in 1996 [ 15]. The high fields are achieved by using a pulsed voltage on the order of 1 MV across a gap of 0.5 to 1 mm. Very short voltage pulses on the order of nanoseconds are used to minimize breakdown and field emission. Ideally the laser pulse should be shorter than the voltage pulse. For an LCLS-type pulse, simulations predict an emittance of 0.4 µm measured 3.25 cm from the cathode [ 16]. Since space charge effects are still significant at 1 MeV, a design for matching this beam into an accelerating structure is needed to evaluate the400.511.522.53 02468 1 0 1 2HBUNCH.SOL.25.EMY.007<X>_[mm] enx_[mmmrad]<X>_[mm] Z_[m]Long Solenoid case 25 MV/m thermal emittance 0.3 mmmrad FIGURE 2. Transverse normalized rms emittance and beam size, computed using HOMDYN, for the LCLS photoinjector, which consists of a 1.6-cell S-band gun with cathode at z=0 and two 3-m TW sections beginning at z~1.5 m [14]. The peak field in the gun is 130 MV/m, while the sections, with a weak solenoid around the first, are operated at 25 MeV/m. Thermal emittance for a Cu cathode is included. final emittance at high energy. Photocathode guns using III-V semiconductor cathodes are now universally used as sources of polarized electron beams for accelerators. The successful operation of such beams at SLAC, Mainz, JLAB and elsewhere has demonstrated operating parameters (not all achieved at the same time) well matched to accelerator requirements. Some of these parameters are shown in Table 1. There remain at least 3 challenges for future polarized electron sources: overcoming the cathode charge limit; increasing the polarization, P; and increasing the average current. 1) The maximum current density that can be extracted is limited by a surface barrier that dynamically grows when charge is temporarily trapped at the surface faster than it can recombine with holes. For a pulse train, such as required by most future collider designs, each pulse is influenced by the decaying surface barrier generated by the previous pulses. New cathode structures plus differential doping may solve this TABLE 1. Operating Parameters Achieved for Polarized Electron Sources. Parameter Value Where Achieved Current Density, J 10 A cm-2SLAC Average Current, IAVG 5 mA JLAB [17], GaAs, unpolarized Polarization, P 80% SLAC Cathode 1/e Lifetime, τ >1000 h SLAC Operating time per cathode >5000 h SLAC5problem [ 18]. 2) Higher polarization will improve the effective luminosity of any high- energy experiment which depends on polarized electrons. In addition, for a future collider, P>95% may be the only reasonable route to certain new physics. Most of the polarization loss in the cathode bulk can probably be eliminated, but losses in the band bending region may be unavoidable, limiting the maximum polarization to P~90%. 3) Finally, the high average currents required by cw accelerators and some types of FELs result in a rapid loss of quantum efficiency (QE) due to ion bombardment at the cathode. Improving the vacuum near the cathode will minimize this effect. Field emitter arrays, ferroelectrics, and secondary electron emitters have the potential to overcome the limitations found with photocathodes for producing high average currents [ 19]. At the present time, the latter is the most promising. It consists of an rf cavity equipped with a secondary emission surface at one end and a secondary emission grid at the beam exit. Startup electrons multiply rapidly during each rf cycle while simultaneously bunching. Steady state conditions are achieved within a few cycles for a pulse train of fixed charge and pulse length. While the pulse spacing is fixed by the rf frequency, the pulses are automatically synchronous with the rf. Proof of principle testing has been carried out at low charge, but simulations show that the charge per bunch can be up to 500 nC [20]. There appears to be some possibility of modulating the charge using a separate grid. POSITRON SOURCES Conventional positron sources for accelerators use a high-energy electron beam impinging on a high-Z material such as W to generate ~100 MeV γs by bremsstrahlung. The γs in turn create electron-positron pairs in the same material. Positrons exiting the target in the 2-20 MeV regime are confined by a magnetic field while being inserted into an rf accelerating field, bunched and accelerated to relativistic energies for transport to the main linac. Because the initial positron beam emittance is large, more damping is required than for an equivalent intensity electron beam. The NLC positron source design is essentially a scaled version of the SLC source. It is highly desirable that the positron beam for a future collider be polarized [ 21]. For many types of experiments, the polarization of the two colliding beams combine to create in effect a single higher polarization. Thus a highly polarized electron beam colliding with a modestly polarized positron beam may be equivalent to the desired single beam polarization P>95%. Another class of experiments is possible only with both beams polarized. At least 3 methods of producing polarized positron beams have been suggested for colliders: helical undulator; Compton scattering ; and polarized electrons. Circularly polarized γs in the required energy range and of sufficient intensity can be produced by passing a 150 GeV electron beam through a 150-m helical undulator [ 22]. The γs are directed to a thin conversion target placed downstream after the electron primary beam is bent away. This is the design chosen by TESLA [ 23] but to date rejected by NLC out of concern that the post-interaction beam is too disrupted, and that alternatively having the undulator in the main linac beamline will impose too great an6operational restriction on the linac. Recently an interesting proposal has been made to operate the first part of the linac at double the normal rf repetition rate in order to accelerate positron-production electrons along with the main beam, then at the 150-point deflecting the positron-production electrons into a separate beamline having the undulator and target [24]. In the second method, circularly-polarized high-energy γs are produced by Compton backscattering of circularly-polarized photons by unpolarized high-energy electrons. Again the γs are directed to a thin conversion target. Such a scheme was first proposed for the JLC by Okugi et al. in 1996 [ 25]. Eighty-five C0 2 lasers, each producing 10 J per pulse (150 Hz) at the fundamental (10.6 µm) are required, one laser for each micropulse in the JLC pulse train. The cross section for Compton scattering is optimized by choosing a 6.7 GeV electron beam. A similar scheme has been proposed by Frisch (1997) that utilizes an Nd:glass laser (1.05 µm) and 1.7 GeV electrons [ 26]. In the latter case, in order to reduce the laser energy requirements, a resonant cavity is introduced to recycle the optical power, allowing the same optical pulse to interact with many electron bunches. The mirrors for the optical cavity are problematic because of the high energy in each laser pulse. A recent experiment at the Accelerator Test Facility (ATF) at KEK demonstrated that the production of positrons from a thin conversion target for which the γs were produced by scattering a 200 mJ Nd:YAG laser beam from the 1.26 GeV ATF electron beam was as expected [27]. The third method is a modification of the conventional scheme. If the incident electron beam is highly polarized, then both the high-energy end of the γ spectrum and of the resulting positrons will be polarized [ 28]. The problem here is that the yield is estimated to be 3 orders of magnitude below that required for colliders. One can imagine a number of ways to increase the total yield, including increasing the charge per pulse in the production beam, filling more rf buckets, using multiple sources, etc., so that in principle the yield might be forced to be adequate, but the practical aspects are daunting. SIMULTANEOUS LASER DAMPING/POLARIZING Potylitsin has recently proposed [ 29] that direct polarization of an unpolarized positron beam by Compton scattering [ 30] may be a more efficient source of polarized positrons than the methods discussed above.1 For this case, the energy and polarization of the polarized positrons after N collisions with identical circularly polarized photons are (here only h= = =m ce1) [29]: γγ µN( )=+0 1 2 and ξµ µN( )=+1, (1) where µ γ ω γσ= =   o o oe phNA m cr 4 3022 and σλ πpho el2 8= . Here γ0 and ω0 are the initial positron and photon energies, A is the laser flash energy, re is the classical electron 1 The process works equally well for electrons.7radius, and λo and le are the laser wavelength and positron bunch length respectively. For example, a 2 GeV positron bunch in a single interaction with a 25 J laser pulse (λo=1 µm) would be expected to result in a polarization of ~60% if le can be reduced to 0.2 mm [ 31]. For a collider such as the NLC with 95 microbunches per pulse train and 120 Hz repetition rate, an average laser power of 0.3 MW is required! However, since the positron beam must in any case be damped, let us review the requirements for laser damping. A powerful laser can be used to damp an electron or positron beam by Compton scattering [ 32]. The requirement for a significant reduction in the initial transverse normalized emittance, εno, is that the electrons should lose a similar fraction of their initial energy, Eo, as a result of the Compton interaction: ε επ γ λno no e o o eE Er m c lA ≅ = +164 32 2 2, (2) where A Jm l mm E GeVE Ee oo[ ][ ] [ ] [ ]= −  251λ µ. For Eo=2 GeV, A=10 J (at λ=1 µm) is required in a single pass to reduce the transverse emittance by a factor of 10 (again assuming le=0.2 mm), which is about the same laser requirement as for polarization. Laser cooling can be combined with a storage ring [ 33] or a damping ring. The current design of the 1.98-GeV NLC damping ring [ 34] has a circumference of 297 m, so the rotation frequency, νrot, is ~1.01 MHz. Three NLC pulse trains of 95 microbunches each are damped for 3 interpulse periods or ~25 ms. Therefore each microbunch passes a reference point in the ring ~2.5 ×104 times. The proposal here is to combine laser cooling with polarization in the NLC damping ring, substituting the laser interaction for the wiggler. By combining these functions, there might be a considerable cost savings. In addition, installation of the polarization function can in principle be delayed until sometime after the damping function is commissioned. Combined with a damping ring, a modest Nd:glass laser system plus an optical resonator as suggested by Frisch for the case of Compton scattering from an unpolarized electron beam to produce γs can be envisioned as shown in Fig. 3. For maximum polarization, the total laser energy seen by each microbunch should be ~25 J or Eb=1 mJ per rotation. This is a reasonable energy per optical pulse for the resonator. The average laser energy (at 1 µm) required for each microbunch in the ring is Pb,avg = Eb× νrot~1 kW. The NLC ring rf is 712 MHz with spacing between microbunches of 2.8 ns (i.e., filling every other rf bucket). There is also a gap between each pulse train. With all 285 microbunches in the ring, the laser must operate at νL=357 MHz, and thus the total average power is Ptot,avg= Eb×νL =357 kW. The average power required of the injection laser is Pinj,avg=100 W ( λ=1 µm) operating at 357 MHz, which is probably doable. Likewise the resonator gain of G=Ptot,avg/ Pinj,avg=3.6×103 can probably be achieved. The principal uncertainty is that the stability of an optical resonator operating under these conditions is unknown. Also the ring design will have to accommodate 2 spin rotators, and the bunch length will have to be reduced, at least in the laser interaction region, to8the order of 0.2 mm. Given these complications, a new ring design, optimized for both laser damping and polarization, should be considered. Cavity MirrorSpin RotatorBeam Out Beam In Interaction PointLaserSpin Rotator Cavity Mirror6-2000 8547A2 FIGURE 3. Conceptual layout of an NLC positron damping ring combining laser cooling and laser polarization. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank J. Frisch, A. Kulikov, and D. Schultz (SLAC) for numerous useful conversations with respect to positron sources and also E. Bessenov (Lebedev) and A. Potylitsin ( Tomsk) for sharing their insights into the possibilities and limitations for direct polarization by Compton scattering. REFERENCES 1. Alley, R. et al., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A 365, 1-27 (1995). 2 Breidenbach, M. et al., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A 350, 1 (1994). 3 Gavrilov, N.G. et al., Nucl Instrum. and Meth. A 331, ABS17 (1993). 4Papadakis, N.H. et al., “Polarized Electrons at NIKHEF,” in Polarized Beams and Polarized Gas Targets, edited by H.P. gen. Schieck and L. Sydow, World Scientific, Singapore, 1996, p. 323. 5Nakanishi, T. et al., “Polarized Electron Source Development in Japan,” in Spin96 Proceedings , edited by C.W. de Jager et al., World Scientific, Singapore, 1997, p. 712. 6 Aulenbacher, K. et al., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A 391, 498 (1997). 7Gowin, M. et al., “A 50kV Inverted Polarized Gun,” in Proceedings of Low Energy Polarized Electron Workshop (LE98) , edited by Y.A. Mamaev et al., SPES-Lab-Publishing, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1998, p. 115. 8Clendenin, J.E., “RF Photoinjectors,” in Proceedings of the XVII International Linear Accelerator Conference , edited by C. Hill and M. Vretenar, CERN, Geneva, CH, 1996, p. 298. 9Cornacchia, M., “The LCLS X-Ray FEL at SLAC,” in Free-Electron Laser Challenges II , edited by H.E. Bennett and D.H. Dowell, SPIE 3614, Bellingham,WA, 1999, p. 109. 10 Babzien, M. et al., Phys. Rev. E 57, 6093 (1998). 11Gierman, S., Streak Camera Enhanced Quadrupole Scan Technique for Characterizing the Temporal Dependence of the Trace Space Distribution of a Photoinjector Electron Beam , a Ph.D dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 1999, ch. 6. 12Ferrario, M. et al., Part. Acc . 52, 1 (1996).9 13Ferrario, M. et al., “HOMDYN Study for the LCLS RF Photo-Injector,” contributed to the 2nd ICFA Advanced Accelerator Workshop on The Physics of High Brightness Beams , Los Angeles, November 9-12, 1999. 14Ferrario, M., INFN-LNF, private communication, 2000. 15Srinivasan-Rao, T. and Smedley, J., “Table Top, Pulsed, Relativistic Electron Gun with GV/m Gradient,” and F. Villa, “Acceleration of Kiloampere Current at 2.65 GV/m,” in Advanced Accelerator Concepts Seventh Workshop , edited by S. Chattopadhyay et al., AIP Conference Proceedings 398, New York, 1997, pp. 730 and 739 respectively. 16Srinivasan-Rao, T. et al, “Simulation, Generation, and Characterization of High Brightness Electron Source at 1 GV/m Gradient,” in Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference , edited by A. Luccio and W. MacKay, IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1999, p. 75. 17Bohn, C.L. et al., “Performance of the Accelerator Driver of Jefferson Laboratory’s Free-Electron Laser,” in Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference , edited by A. Luccio and W. MacKay, IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1999, p. 2450. 18 Togawa, K. et al., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A 414, 431 (1998). 19 Nation, J.A. et al., Proc. of the IEEE 87, 865 (1999). 20Len, L.K. and F.M. Mako, “Self-Bunching Electron Guns,” in Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference , edited by A. Luccio and W. MacKay, IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1999, p. 70. 21Subashiev, A.V. and Clendenin, J.E., “Polarized Electron Beams with P ≥90%, Will It Be Possible ?,” Preprint SLAC-PUB-8312, 2000; and Clendenin, J.E., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 13, 2507 (1998). See also Omori, T., “A Polarized Positron Beam for Linear Colliders,” KEK Preprint 98-237, 1999. 22Mikhailichenko, A.A., “Use of Undulators at High Energy to Produce Polarized Positrons and Electrons,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on New Kinds of Positron Sources for Linear Colliders , edited by J. Clendenin and R. Nixon, SLAC-R-502, Stanford, 1997, p. 229. 23“Conceptual Design of a 500 GeV e+e- Linear Collider with Integrated X-ray Laser Facility,” edited by R. Brinkmann et al., DESY 1997-048/ECFA 1997-182. 24 Frisch, J., SLAC, private communication, 2000. 25 Okugi, T. et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 3677 (1996). 26Frisch, J., “Design Considerations for a Compton Backscattering Positron Source,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on New Kinds of Positron Sources for Linear Colliders, edited by J. Clendenin and R. Nixon, SLAC-R-502, Stanford, 1997, p. 125. 27 Dobashi, K. et al., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A 437, 169 (1999). 28Bessonov, E.G. and Mikhailichenko, A.A., “A Method of Polarized Positron Beam Production,” in Proceedings of the 5th European Particle Accelerator Conference , edited by S. Myers et al., IoP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 1996, p. 1516; Potylitsin, A.P., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A 398, 395 (1997). 29Potylitsyn, A., “Single-Pass Laser Polarization of Ultrarelativistic Positrons,” Preprint arXiv:physics/0001004, 2000. 30Polarization of electrons in a storage ring using circularly polarized photons was proposed in Yu. A. Bashmakov, E.G. Bessonov, and Ya. A. Vazdik, Pis’ma Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 1, 520 (1975), English translation Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett 1, 239 (1975). See also comments on this proposal in Ya. S. Derbenev, A.M. Kondratenko and E.L. Saldin, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth . 165, 201 (1979). 31Processes not accounted for in reference 29 may affect the final polarization value. A. Potylitsyn, Tomsk, private communication, 2000. 32 Telnov, V., Phys. Rev. Lett . 78, 4757 (1997). 33Huang, Z. and Ruth, R., “Radiation Damping and Quantum Excitation in a Focusing-Dominated Storage Ring,” in Quantum Aspects of Beam Dynamics , edited by P. Chen, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999, p. 34. 34Corlett, J.N. et al., “The Next Linear Collider Damping Ring Complex,” in Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference , edited by A. Luccio and W. MacKay, IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1999, p. 3429.

arXiv:physics/0008019v1 [physics.optics] 8 Aug 2000DOI 10.1007/s1010513a123EPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013)EPJdirect electronic only c/circlecopyrtSpringer-Verlag 2013 Four-wave mixing at maximum coherence and eliminated Doppler broadening controlled with the driving fields A. K. Popov1,2, Alexander S. Bayev1, Thomas F. George3, and Vladimir M. Shalaev1,4 1Institute for Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasno yarsk, 660036, Russia e-mail: lco@iph.krasn.ru 2Krasnoyarsk State University and Krasnoyarsk State Techni cal University e-mail: popov@ksc.krasn.ru 3Office of the Chancellor / Departments of Chemistry and Physic s & Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI 5 4481-3897, USA email: tgeorge@uwsp.edu 4Department of Physics, New Mexico State University, Las Cru ces, NM 88003-8001, USA e-mail: vshalaev@nmsu.edu Received: Abstract. New feasibity of coherent quantum control of four-wave mixi ng processes in a resonant Doppler-broadened medium are studied. We prop ose a technique which enables one to enhance the quantum efficiency of nonlinear opt ical conversion. At the same time, it allows one to decrease the required intensitie s of the fundamental beams compared to those necessary in the approach based on coheren t population trapping. The major outcomes of the analysis are illustrated with nume rical simulation addressed within a practical medium. PACS: 42.50.Ct, 42.50.Gy, 42.50.Hz, 42.65.Ky, 42.65.Dr 1 Introduction The concept of quantum coherence and interference plays an i mportant role in resonant nonlinear optics and spectroscopy [ 1]. Coherent coupling of laser radia- tion with multilevel quantum schemes has been used to manipu late energy level populations, nonlinear-optical response, refraction and absorption of a resonance medium [ 2]. Much attention has been shown to four-wave mixing (FWM) pr o- cesses with maximal coherence on a Raman transition [ 3] based on the effect of coherence population trapping (CPT) [ 4], which allows a dramatic increase of conversion efficiency. In far-from-degenerate schemes, sub stantial Doppler broad- ening of the resonant quantum transitions gives rise to inho mogeneous coupling of the driving fields with the atoms in different velocity inte rvals. Therefore, under relatively low intensities, only a small fraction of t he atoms can be con- currently coupled with both the fields driving the Raman tran sition and, as a http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 2 consequence, the CPT conditions can not be fulfilled for the e ntire thermal ve- locity interval. This fundamental limitation in resonant n onlinear optics of gases substantially reduces the efficiency of the corresponding pr ocesses. The common methods of Doppler-free (DF) nonlinear spectroscopy entai l ladder energy level schemes and equal frequency counter-propagating beams. Th is usually leads to large detunings from the intermediate resonance and conseq uently a decrease of the nonlinear susceptibility. Besides that, the method c an not be applied to FWM processes in ladder schemes, due to the phase-matching r equirements, and in Raman-type schemes due to the difference in frequencies of the coupled fields. The technique, allowing one to overcome this obstacle by com pensating for Doppler frequency shifts with light-induced ac-Stark shif ts and thus enabling one to couple a wide velocity interval concurrently, has bee n proposed in [ 5]. This was developed in further publications [ 6] and most recently in publications [7] addressing FWM under conditions where CPT is not possible. Related effects in the absorption index were also investigated recently [ 8]. We further mean CPT as the process where two driving fields for m nearly equal velocity-averaged populations of the levels at Raman transitions, while the velocity-averaged population of the intermediate state is much less. Along with this absorption and amplification indices for the couple fiel ds reach minimum. On the other hand coherence in the Raman transition, which is origin of FWM, approaches maximum. That allows one to accomplish a maximum of the con- version efficiency. The conditions to achieve CPT may differ fr om those required for the DF Raman-type resonance. This present paper is aimed at investigating what are the most favorable conditions to accomplish effecti ve FWM frequency conversion of radiation at a low fundamental radiation leve l.This also addresses the problem “nonlinear optics at the level a few photons per a tom” [ 9]. 2 Theoretical 2.1 Atomic coherence and energy level populations Consider a Raman-type scheme of 0 1 2 3 ω1 ω2 ω3 ωS Fig.1. Energy level configurationFWM, ωS=ω1−ω2+ω3, depicted in Fig.1, where E1andE2with frequen- ciesω1andω2are traveling waves of the driving fields. The field E3with the frequency ω3and generated radi- ation ESwith the frequency ωSare assumed weak (i.e., not changing the level populations). All waves are co- propagated. Initially, only the lower level0is populated. The steady-state solution for the off-diagonal elements of the density matrix (atomic coher- ence) can be found in the same form of traveling waves as the th e resonant driving radiations. Then the equations for the density matr ix amplitudes to the http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 3 lowest order in E3,Scan be written as P01r01=−i[G01(r1−r0)−G21r02], P21r21=−i[G21(r1−r2)−G01r20], P02r02=−i[G01r12−G12r01] ; (1) Γ1r1= 2Re[ iG12r21+iG10r01], Γ2r2=−2Re[iG12r21] +γ2r1, r0+r1+r2= 1; (2) P23r23=−i[−G23r2+G21r13−G03r20], P03r03=−i[−G03r0+G01r13−G23r02], P13r13=−i[G12r23−G23r12+G10r03−G03r10] (3) Hererijandriare the amplitudes of the off-diagonal and diagonal elements of the density matrix, Pij=Γij+i(Ωl−klv),Ωlis the resonance detuning for the corresponding resonant field (e.g., Ω1=ω1−ω01),Γijare homogeneous half- widths of the transitions (coherence relaxation rates), vis the projection of the atom velocity on the direction of the wave vectors kl,γ1,2are relaxation rates from level 1to0and from 1to2, accordingly, Γ1, Γ2are relaxation rates of the populations of the levels 1and2accordingly, Gij=−Ejdij/2¯hare the Rabi frequencies, and dijare the electric dipole momenta of the transitions. Only the resonant couplings are accounted for. The solution for the coherence r02and for those at the allowed transitions, which determine absorption and refraction at the frequenci esω1,ω2,ω3, are found in the form r02=G01G12 ˜P02/braceleftbigg∆r10 P01−∆r21 P∗ 21/bracerightbigg =G01G12 P01P∗ 21R02, r01=−iG01 P01/braceleftbigg ∆r10−|G12|2 ˜P02/parenleftbigg∆r10 P01−∆r21 P∗ 21/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg =−iG01 P01R1, r12=−iG12 P∗ 21/braceleftbigg ∆r21+|G01|2 ˜P02/parenleftbigg∆r10 P01−∆r21 P∗ 21/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg =−iG12 P∗ 21R2, r23=iG23 P23/braceleftbigg r2/parenleftbigg 1−|G12|2 P23˜P13/parenrightbigg −|G01G12|2 P03˜P13R02 P01P∗ 21−|G12|2 P∗ 21˜P13R2/bracerightbigg , where ∆rijare intensity-dependent population differences, and ˜P02and˜P13are two-photon denominators “dressed” by the driving fields: ˜P02=P02+|G01|2 P∗ 21+|G12|2 P01,˜P13=P13+|G01|2 P03+|G12|2 P23. (4) The coherence r03consists of two terms. One, ¯ r03, determines absorption and refraction at the frequency ωS, and the other, ˜ r03, determines FWM at ω1−ω2+ω3=ωS: ¯r03=iG03 P03/braceleftbigg r0/parenleftbigg 1−|G01|2 P03˜P13/parenrightbigg −|G01G12|2 P23˜P13R∗ 02 P∗ 01P21+|G01|2 P∗ 01˜P13R∗ 1/bracerightbigg ,(5) ˜r03=−iG01G12G23 P01P∗ 21P03/braceleftbigg R02/parenleftbigg|G01|2 P03˜P13−1/parenrightbigg +P01P∗ 21 ˜P13/parenleftbiggr2 P23+R2 P∗ 21/parenrightbigg/bracerightbigg ,(6) http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 4 where P03=Γ03+i(Ω1−Ω2+Ω3−kSv) and kS=k1−k2+k3. Making use of the above equations, the solution for the popul ations can be found from ( 2) as r2=Y1W02−Y3W01 Y1Y4−Y3Y2, r1=Y4W01−Y2W02 Y1Y4−Y3Y2, r0= 1−r1−r2, (7) where Y1= 2W01−W02+γ1, Y 2=W02+W01+Γ2, Y3=W02−W21−γ2, Y 4=W02+W21+Γ2, and W01= 2|G01|2Re/braceleftbigg/parenleftbigg 1−|G12|2 P01˜P02/parenrightbigg /P01/bracerightbigg , W21= 2|G12|2Re/braceleftbigg/parenleftbigg 1−|G01|2 P∗ 21˜P02/parenrightbigg /P∗ 21/bracerightbigg , W02= 2|G01|2|G12|2Re/braceleftBig 1/P01P∗ 21˜P02/bracerightBig . 2.2 Coherence-induced Doppler-free resonance The appearance of a DF resonance and therefore the coupling o f molecules from a wide velocity interval can be understood as follows. Ac-Stark shifts Im/braceleftbig |G01|2/P∗ 21/bracerightbig and Im/braceleftbig |G12|2/P01/bracerightbig in (4),originating from the coherence r02, depend on the radiation intensity and frequency detunings . The later ones, in turn, depend on Doppler shifts. This allows one, by making judicious choice of the intensities and detunings of the driving fields, to “dr aw” into the dressed two-photon resonance allthe molecules, independent of their velocities. In the limiting case, when the detuning from the intermediate reso nance is much greater than the Doppler HWHM of the allowed optical transitions, th e modified two- photon resonance described by the denominator ˜P02can be presented in the lowest order in k1,2v/Ω1,2as ˜P02=˜Γ02+i˜Ω02−i/braceleftbigg/parenleftbigg 1 +|G12|2 Ω2 1/parenrightbigg k1−/parenleftbigg 1 +|G01|2 Ω2 2/parenrightbigg k2/bracerightbigg v, (8) where ˜Γ02=Γ02+|G01|2 Ω2 2Γ12+|G12|2 Ω2 1Γ01,˜Ω02=Ω1−Ω2+|G01|2 Ω2−|G12|2 Ω1 are the power broadened HWHM and ac-Stark shifted two-photo n resonance detuning. From ( 8) it follows that the requirements for the induced Doppler-f ree resonance to be achieved are ˜Ω02= 0 and ˜k1=˜k2, where ˜k1v=/parenleftbigg 1 +|G12|2 Ω2 1/parenrightbigg k1vand˜k2v=/parenleftbigg 1 +|G01|2 Ω2 2/parenrightbigg k2v are intensity-dependent Doppler shifts. Eventually the eq uations take form k1/parenleftbigg 1 +|G12|2 Ω2 1/parenrightbigg −k2/parenleftbigg 1 +|G01|2 Ω2 2/parenrightbigg = 0, (9) Ω1/parenleftbigg 1−|G12|2 Ω2 1/parenrightbigg −Ω2/parenleftbigg 1−|G01|2 Ω2 2/parenrightbigg = 0. (10) http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 5 From ( 9)-(10) follows a cubic equation as Ω2: Ω3 2r−(2−K)Ω2 2rΩ1−Ω2r|G01|2+KΩ1|G01|2= 0, K =k2/k1,(11) which determines the detuning of field E2, corresponding to the induced reso- nance, under given values of the Rabi frequency and detuning of field E1. Here, the Rabi frequency of E2must be |G12|2=Ω2 1/braceleftbigg K/parenleftbigg 1 +|G01|2 Ω2 2r/parenrightbigg −1/bracerightbigg . (12) One of the roots of the equation ( 11) corresponds to the dressed DF two-photon resonance, Ω2r= (A1/3+ 9B+ 2Ω1−Ω1K)/3, (13) where A= 9Ω1|G01|2(1−2K) +Ω3 1(8−12K+ 6K2−K3) + 3[3 Ω2 1|G01|4× ×(−1−8K+ 11K2) + 3Ω4 1|G01|2(−8K+ 12K2−6K3+K4)−3|G01|6]1/2, B= (|G01|2+ 4Ω2 1−4Ω2 1K+Ω2 1K2)/3A1/3, K =k2/k1. The conditions for the CPT and DF resonances may fit each other or differ, de- pending on the specific case. This and corresponding outcome s regarding FWM will be investigated below numerically for the most optimum situations, where the analytical solution can not be obtained. 3 Numerical analysis The graphs presented below are computed numerically based o n averages over the velocity equations ( 5), (6) and ( 7). For the numerical analysis we have used the parameters of the sodium dimer transition with the follo wing wavelengths [10]:X1Σ+ g(v′′= 3, J′′= 43) – B1Πu(6,43)(λ01= 488 nm) – X1Σ+ g(13,43) (λ21= 525 nm) – A1Σ+ u(24,44)(λ23= 655 nm) – X1Σ+ g(3,43)(λ13= 598 nm). The corresponding homogeneous half-widths of the transiti on are 20.69, 23.08, 18.30 and 15.92 MHz, whereas the Doppler half-widths ∆ωiDare equal to 0.92, 0.85, 0.68 and 0.75 GHz. The numerical simulations allow us t o analyze the velocity-averaged equation for the detunings, where the ap proximation taken in (8) is not valid. 3.1 Nonlinear resonances in FWM polarizations, in absorpti on indices and in the level populations Figure 2, plots 1 illustrate the coherence-induced compensation of Doppler shifts with ac-Stark shifts resulting in the resonance narrowing i n the squared module of the velocity-averaged reduced nonlinear FWM polarizati ons |˜P4|2= (|˜χ4|2/|˜χ40|2)|g01|2|g12|2[Fig.2(a)] and |˜P3|2= (|˜χ3|2/|˜χ40|2)|g01|2|g12|2 [Fig.2(b)]. The nonlinear susceptibility is reduced by its maximum v alue in the same frequency range, but for negligibly-weak E1andE2fields, g01= http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 6 −0.2 0.2 0.6 100.511.522.5x 10−3 Ω2/∆ω2D 1 2 3 00.5 100.51 P4 ~ |χ4|2 a −0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.200.20.40.60.811.2 Ω2/∆ω2D 1 2 3 P3 ~ b Fig.2. Normalized squared module of the FWM polarizations ˜P4(a) and ˜P3(b) vs the detuning of driving field E2. The plots correspond to: 1– DF resonance, 2 – CPT, 3 – intermediate case, subplot – same resonance, but un der weak fields. G01/∆ω1D,g12=G12/∆ω2D.A substantial narrowing is seen from comparison with the subplot , presenting the spectral dependence of the velocity-avera ged squared module of the same susceptibility, but in the neglig ibly weak fields, nor- malized to unity. The HWHM of the resonance in the subplot is a pproximately 70 MHz, which corresponds to the Doppler width of the nonpert urbated Raman transition, whereas the HWHM of the resonance in plots 1 is 15 MHz. This indicates some power and residual Doppler broadening. The R abi frequencies of the fields E1andE2are equal to 157 MHz and 85 MHz. The detuning of E1is equal to 413.8 MHz (0 .45·∆ω1D), and detuning of E3is equal to -695.5 MHz ( −1.02·∆ω3D). Plots 2 display the same dependences, but related to the CPT conditions (the half-width of this resonance in |˜P4|2is 200 MHz). In this case, the required Rabi frequencies of E1andE2are equal to 351 MHz and 332 MHz, respectively, while the detunings are identical to tho se in plots 1. Plots 3 display the same dependence, but under the intensities, tha t provide narrowing in the intermediate range (HWHM of resonance is 70 MHz). In th is case, the Rabi frequencies of the fields E1andE2are equal to 222 MHz and 235 MHz, respectively, whereas the detunings are the same as in the pr evious plots. The important outcome is that in the Doppler-free regime, large r FWM polariza- tions can be accomplished under lower driving fields. Also, we want to stress the substantial difference in magnitudes of the nonlinear su sceptibilities χ4and χ3, which follows from the interference of contributions of mo lecules in different velocity intervals to the macroscopic nonlinear polarizat ions. Figure 3(a) shows dependence of the velocity integrated populations on the de tuning of the field E2, while the Rabi frequencies of E1andE2are equal to 351 MHz and 332 MHz, respectively so that the CPT conditions can be fulfilled unde r appropriate de- tuning. The subplot displays the distribution of the popula tions over velocities, whereas the detuning corresponds to the CPT regime for the ve locity-integrated populations. Here uis the thermal velocity with Maxwell envelope removed. The subplot indicates CPT for molecules in v= 0; however, even inversion of the populations occurs in a relatively wide velocity interv als. Figure 3(b) is computed for the Rabi frequencies of the fields E1andE2 http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 7 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.800.20.40.6 Ω2/∆ω2D 0 1 2 −20200.51 v/u a ri 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.800.20.40.60.8 Ω2/∆ω2D 0 1 2 −20200.51 v/uri b Fig.3. Velocity integrated population of the energy levels vs detu ning of driving fieldE2. a– near CPT and CPT regime, subplot – velocity distribution of the co- herently trapped populations; b– near DF regime, subplot – v elocity distribution of populations under DF regime. equal to 157 MHz and 85 MHz, respectively. The inset displays the distribution of the populations over velocities at the detuning correspo nding to DF. The distribution is even more complicated compared to that in th e previous case. Figure 4displays velocity-averaged absorption indices vs detunin g of the field E2. The intensities of the fields are the same as in the correspon ding graphs given 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7−4−3−2−1012345 Ω2/∆ω2D 1 2 S (x 0.1) αk/α10 x 10−2 a −0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2−0.500.511.522.533.54 Ω2/∆ω2D 1 2 S (x 0.1) αk/α10 x10−2 b Fig.4. Velocity averaged absorption indices α1,2,Snear DF (a) and CPT (b) regimes vs detuning of the driving field E2. above. The graph 4(a) shows a substantially decreased absorption index for th e first field due to saturation effects, which is almost independ ent of the detuning of the second field because of its relative weakness. The seco nd field experiences Stokes gain. The plot for the generated beam (reduced by 10) d isplays a nonlinear resonance in the absorption index. With growth of the second field intensity, so that CPT becomes possible, both absorption of the first and ga in of the second driving field experience substantial decrease in the CPT reg ime. Absorption of the generated field dramatically changes as well (Figure 4(a)). A linear approximation in k1,2v/Ω1,2(see equation ( 8)) is valid for large de- tunings from the intermediate resonance. While for tuning c lose to the resonance, http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 8 the concurrently coupled velocity interval decreases, the nonlinear response of the molecules grows. At the same time, absorption of the coup led radiations increases as well. The output FWM generated radiation is determined by the inte rplay of the above considered processes. Moreover, resonant FWM may not be viewed as a sequence of the independent elementary acts of absorption , gain and FWM. Interference of these elementary processes plays a crucial role, even for a quali- tative prediction of the spatial dynamics of the generated fi eld [11]. Therefore, appropriate optimization is required in order to achieve th e maximum FWM- generation output. In the next section, relevant results ar e presented based on the above analyzed dependencies. 3.2 Coherent quantum control of FWM in a double- ΛDoppler broadened medium The solution of the Maxwell equations for the coupled travel ing waves can be found in the form Ej(z, t) = Re {Ej(z)exp[i( ωjt−kjz)]}, (14) where kjare complex wave number at the corresponding frequencies, kj=k′ j− iαj/2. The set of the equations for the amplitudes, relevant to th e case under consideration, is dE1 dz=−α1 2E1,dE2 dz=−α2 2E2, (15) dE3 dz=−α3 2E3+σ3E∗ 1E2ESexp{−i∆kz }, (16) dES dz=−αS 2ES+σSE1E∗ 2E3exp{i∆kz }, (17) where σ3=i2πk3˜χ3andσS=i2πkS˜χSare cross coupling parameters, ˜ χ3and ˜χSare intensity-dependent nonlinear susceptibilities for t he FWM processes ωS↔ω1−ω2+ω3and∆k=kS−k1+k2−k3. The boundary conditions are El(z= 0) = E0l(l= 1,2,3) and ES(z= 0) = 0. We assume that intensities of the weak waves with frequencies ω3andωSare weak enough so that the change of the strong fields E1,2due to FWM conversion can be neglected. The quantum efficiency of conversion QEC of the radiation E3inESis defined by the equation ηq= (ω3/ωS)|ES(z)/E3(0)|2exp(−αSz). (18) Assuming that the condition of phase matching ∆k′= 0 can be ensured (e.g., with a buffer gas), the solution for QEC of the above given equa tions can be expressed as ηq=ω3 ωS/vextendsingle/vextendsingleσS g0/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2/vextendsingle/vextendsingleE01E02/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2exp/bracketleftBig (Reg0−α 2)z/bracketrightBig/vextendsingle/vextendsingle1−exp(−g0z)/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2, g0=/bracketleftBig [(α1+α2+α3−αS/2)]2+ 4σSσ3/vextendsingle/vextendsingleE01E02/vextendsingle/vextendsingle2/bracketrightBig1/2 , α=α3+αS. http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 9 These formulas account for nonlinear resonances both in FWM nonlinear polar- izations and in absorption indices. In order to compute the a bsolute magnitude of QEC (under the assumption of ∆k′= 0) we have used the data for the Frank- Condon factors of 0.068, 0.142, 0.02 and 0.036 for the transi tion with wavelengths λ01,λ21,λ23andλ03accordingly. Figure 5presents a numerical simulation of the evolution of QEC alon g the vapor cell. The distance is scaled to the resonance optical d ensity α01zwith the driving fields being turned off. The plot 1 corresponds to t he case where the conditions for Doppler compensation at the transition 0 –2 are fulfilled on the entrance of the cell. The Doppler-free resonance would b e narrower if one of the coupled fields were weak. However, that would give rise to larger absorp- tion and to decreased nonlinear FWM polarization. The optim ization accounting for the change of the driving fields along the medium also show s that it does not substantially change the optimum input intensity value s for the plots pre- sented in Fig. 5. Plot 2 displays the same dependence, but for the optimum CPT conditions. Alternatively, they are not optimum for the eli mination of Doppler broadening. The maxima of these two curves are 0 5 10 1500.511.522.533.5 α01z 1 2 3ηq,% Fig.5. QEC vs optical density of the medium. 1 – DF, 2 – CPT, 3 – interme- diate regimes.comparable, but in the Doppler- free regime, quite lower intensities of the fundamental radiations are required. Plot 3 displays a similar dependence in the intermediate case. All inten- sities and detunings are identical to those used for computing the previ- ous figures. For the transitions under consid- eration, the Rabi frequency on the level of 100 MHz corresponds to pow- ers of about 100 mW focused on a spot on the order of 10−4cm2, which can be realized with common cw lasers with the confocal parame- ter of focusing of about 2.5 cm. At a temperature of about 700 K , the optimum optical density of the dimers is achievable for vapor length s of about 2 cm. This is in accord with the parameters of typical cw FWM experiment s (see, e.g. [ 10]). The above indicated intensity corresponds to about 1011photons per cubic centimeter. Accounting for the molecule number density at t he indicated temper- ature, which is on the order on 1013cm−3,we have about 10−2photon/molecule. 4 Conclusion Coherent control of populations [ 12] and of four-wave mixing [ 13] with pulses shorter than the dephasing time T2has proven to be a powerful tool for manip- ulating nonlinear-optical and chemical properties of free atoms and molecules. In these cases, maximum coherence can be achieved as a result of Rabi oscilla- tions of the two-photon transition, and the required drivin g intensity is much http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 10 higher than that proposed in this paper. Consequently, Dopp ler broadening of the coupled transitions does not play an important role. On the contrary, this paper considers coherent quantum cont rol of resonant four-wave mixing processes, where Doppler-broadening of a double- Λmedium is the factor of crucial importance. An approach enabling on e to enhance the efficiency of nonlinear optical conversion and, at the same ti me, to decrease the required intensity for the fundamental pump beams is propos ed. This approach is based on the elimination of Doppler broadening of the reso nant two-photon transition. The advantages of the proposed method as compar ed to those based on coherent population trapping, where inhomogeneous broa dening may play important role too, are illustrated with numerical simulat ions for realistic exper- imental schemes. The results obtained contribute to the fiel d of nonlinear optics at the level of several photons per atom, which is currently a ttracting growing interest. 5 Acknowledgments TFG and AKP thank U.S. National Research Council - National A cademy of Sciences for support of this research through the internati onal Collaboration in Basic Science and Engineering (COBASE) program. AKP and ASB acknowledge funding support from the International Association of the E uropean Community for the promotion of co-operation with scientists from the N ew Independent States of the former Soviet Union (INTAS) (grant INTAS-99-1 9) and Russian Foundations for Basic Research (grant 99-02-39003) and fro m the Center on Fundamental Natural Sciences at St. Petersburg University (grant 97-5.2-61). References 1. S.G. Rautian and A.M. Shalagin, Kinetic Problems of Nonlinear Spectroscopy Amsterdam: Elsevier 1991 A.K. Popov, Introduction in Nonlinear Spectroscopy Novosibirsk: Nauka 1983 (in Russian) 2. For review see, e.g. Papers from Atomic Coherence and interference , Crested Butte Workshop 1993: Journal of the European Optical Societ y B6(1994) No 4 A review of early Russian works can be found in: A.K. Popov and S.G. Rautian: Proc. SPIE 2798 (1996) 49 (review) Coherent Phenom- ena and Amplification without Inversion (A.V. Andreev, O. Kocharovskaya and P. Mandel, Editors), http://www.spie.org/web/abstracts/2700/2798.html , http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005114 A.K. Popov: Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci., Physics 60(1996) 927 (Allerton Press. Inc) [Transl. from: Izvestiya RAN, ser. Fiz. 60(1996) 92] (review), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005108 A.K. Popov: Proc. SPIE 3485 (1998) 252 (S.G. Rautian, I.M. Beterov, N.M. Rubtsova, Editors), http://www.spie.org/web/abstracts/3400/3485.html , http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005118 3. Maanesh Jain, Hui Xia, G.Y. Yin, A.J. Merriam, and S.E. Har ris: Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 4326, http://ojps.aip.org/prlo/ Y. Li and M. Xiao: Opt. Lett. 21(1996) 1064 http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.htmlEPJdirect Ax, x–x (2013) Springer-Verlag 11 B. Lu, W.H. Burkett, and M. Xiao: Opt. Lett. 23(1998) 804, http://ojps.aip.org/olo/ A.V. Sokolov, G.Y. Yin, and S.E. Harris: Proc. SPIE 3485 (1998) 26 (S.G. Rautian, I.M. Beterov, N.M. Rubtsova, Editors) V.G. Arkhipkin, S.A. Myslivets, D.V. Manushkin, and A.K. Po pov:ibid, 525, http://www.spie.org/web/abstracts/3400/3485.html V.G. Arkhipkin, S.A. Myslivets, D.V. Manushkin, and A.K. Po pov: Quantum Electronics 28(1998) 637, http://turpion.ioc.ac.ru/ A.J. Merriam, S.J. Sharpe, H. Xia, D. Manuszak, G.Y. Yin, and S.E. Harris: Opt. Lett. 24(1999) 625, http://ojps.aip.org/olo/ 4. B.D. Agap’ev, M.B. Gorniy, B.G. Matisov, Yu.V. Rojdestve nskiy: Usp. Fiz. Nauk 163(1993) 1 E. Arimondo: Progress in Optics XXXV (1996) 257 5. T.Ya. Popova, A.K. Popov, S.G. Rautian, A.A. Feoktistov: Sov. Phys. JETP, 30, 243 (1970) [Translated from Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 57, 444 (1969)], http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005081 C. Cohen-Tannoudji: Metrologia 13(1977) 161 6. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, F. Hoffbeck, S. Reynaud: Opt. Comm. 27(1978) 71 A.K. Popov and L.N. Talashkevich: Optics Comm. 28(1979) 315 S. Reynaud, M. Himbert, J. Dupon-Roc, H.H. Stroke and C. Cohe n-Tannoudji: Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(1979) 756 A.K. Popov and V.M. Shalaev: Optics Comm. 35(1980) 189 A.K. Popov and V.M. Shalaev: Opt. Spectrosc. 49(1981) 336 [Transl. from Opt.Spektrosk. 49(1980) 617] A.K. Popov and V.M. Shalaev: Sov. J. Quant. Electr. 12(1982) 289 [Transl. from Kvant. Electr. 9(1982) 488] S. Reynaud, M. Himbert, J. Dalibard, J. Dupont-Roc and C. Coh en-Tannoudji: Opt. Comm. 42(1982) 39 7. A.K. Popov and A.S. Bayev: JETP Letters 69 (1999) 110, http://ojps.aip.org/jetplo/ A.K. Popov and A.S. Bayev: Phys. Rev. A 62, 025801 (2000), http://ojps.aip.org/prao/ 8. G. Vemuri, G.S. Agarwal, B. Rao: Phys. Rev. A 53(1996) 2842 Yifu Zhu and T.N. Wasserlauf: Phys. Rev. A 54(1996) 3653 Yifu Zhu, T.N. Wasserlauf and P. Sanchez: Phys. Rev. A 54(1996) 4500 A.K. Popov and V.M. Shalaev: Phys. Rev. A 59(1999) 946, http://ojps.aip.org/prao/ 9. S.E. Harris and L.V. Hau: Phys. Rev. Lett. 82(1999) 4611, http://ojps.aip.org/prlo/ 10. S. Babin, U. Hinze, E. Tiemann and B. Wellegehausen: Opt. Lett.21(1996) 1186, http://ojps.aip.org/olo/ 11. A.K. Popov, S.A. Myslivets, E. Tiemann, B. Wellegehause n and G. Tartakovsky: JETP Letters 69(1999) 912, http://ojps.aip.org/jetplo/ . 12. T.Rickes, L.P. Yatsenko, S.Steuerwald, T.Halfmann, B. W.Shore, N.V.Vitanov, and K.Bergmann: J.Chem.Phys. 113 (2000) 534 http://www.physik.uni- kl.de/w bergma/Publications/1997-2000/ 13. O. Kittelmann, J. Ringling, A. Nazarkin, G. Korn, and I. V . Hertel: Phys. Rev. Lett.76(1996) 2682, http://ojps.aip.org/prlo/ ; A. Nazarkin, G. Korn, O. Kittelmann, J. Ringling, and I. V. He rtel: Phys. Rev. A56(1997) 671 http://ojps.aip.org/prao/ http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10105 /index.html

IHEP EXPERIENCE ON CREATION AND OPERATION OF RFQS. O.K. Belyaev, O.V. Ershov, I.G. Maltsev, V.B. Stepanov, S.A. Strekalovskikh, V.A. Teplyakov, A.V.Zherebtsov, IHEP, Protvino, Russia Abstract The new 1.8 MeV proton RFQ was completed and start operation in the IHEP in 1997. It was built according tothe plan of modernization of the injection system to thebooster of the IHEP proton synchrotron. In this paper wewill describe design features of the RFQ and scientificand engineering achievements which was reached since itscreation and operation. Introduction An insistent need to modernize the injection system was caused by following reasons. The old injector is under operation since 1983 (the initial part of this linac − RFQ since 1990) [1]. Most of RF and other equipment be-comes old and should be modified. Besides it was decidedto modify the accelerating system. The attractive featureof this RFQ is a high acceleration rate (1.4 MeV/m at theend (Fig.1)) which allows better matching on longitudinalmotion with next part of the linac. It was reached due to proper variation of phase Φ and transit time factor ϑ along the RFQ (Fig.1) In its turn high values of ϑ (0.66 at the end) were achieved by using a trapezoidal modulationof electrodes at the end of the RFQ instead of sinusoidalones (Fig.2). Figure.1: RFQ parameters along the linac Figure2: Sinusoidal and trapezoidal RFQ electrodes “Trapezoidal” electrodes allows to obtain high ϑ with- out increasing of the modulation factor and hence peakfield on the surface [2]. Indeed, the following expression defines ϑ as a first approximation [3]: παπαϑ) sin(≈ , (1) where α=g/βλ, g – length of a gap. As this formula shows, ϑ-factor increases with decrease in the gap length. This expression is correct for RFQ structures too. One may define the «gap» here as the space where 0≠zE , i.e. the whole cell except of a small piece at the top of a sinusoid. But if the sinusoid top is «cut off» then the «gap» will decrease and according to (1) ϑ increases. Main parameters of this RFQ are given in the Table. Table : RFQ parameters RFQ parameter Value Input energy 0.1 MeV Output energy 1.8 MeV Operating frequency 148.5 MHz RF voltage 140 kV Synchronous phase -90÷-30 deg Maximum surface E-field 250 kV/cm Capture 99% Operating beam current 120 mA Total length 2563 mm Characteristic bore radius 7.59 mm Total number of cells 91 «sinusoidal» cells 71 «trapezoidal» cells 20 Acceleration structure and RFQ option. The general view of the RFQ is shown in Fig.3. Figure 3: General view of the RFQ. 2H resonator was used as an accelerating structure of the RFQ (Fig.4). It consists of 520 mm diameter RF vac-uum tank and two 164 mm diameter resonators which are pieces of tubes with slits. Accelerating electrodes aremounted at edges of these slits. The tank and resonatorsare manufactured of aluminium alloy and coated with100 µm copper layer. The technology of galvanic coating provides very good polished surfaces with high conductivity. Electrodes aremachined of oxygen-free copper. An 50 µm deformable indium seal in the mount unit is used for better electricjunction between electrodes and resonators. 3 ion pumpsprovide a high (of the order 8105−⋅ torr) vacuum. Besides additional getter pump can keep a good eno ugh vacuum during downtime of the linac. Water-cooling pumpingthrough channels in the tank and resonators provides re-quired temperature stability. Figure 4: Cross section of the RFQ. The choice of this accelerating structure was caused due to an absence of parasite oscillation modes in the im-mediate neighbourhood of the operating mode and tech-nological effectiveness of its manufacture. RF tuning was carried out by separated action on elec- tric and magnetic fields in front and end faces of the2H resonator. The small perturbation method was used formeasurements of an E-field quadrupole component. Re-sults are shown in the Fig.5. As the figure shows, nor-malized distribution is well agreed with required curve.The rms deviation is %3.1=σ . Q-factor for 2H-resonator, calculated with help of PRUD-0 code [4], is equal to 15800. Measured Q-factoris 13600 (86% of calculated one). RF power losses whichdissipates in the resonator walls at this value of theQ-factor is about 200 kW. Tuning of the operating frequency was carried out by rotational rings as adjusting units (Fig.4). Each ringchanges a frequency by 8 KHz. High-speed automatic trimming ( c KHz t f / 190 /=∆∆ ) is used to compensate frequency detuning while the accelerator is under opera-tion. This system also keep a frequency deviation in therange of ±1.5 KHz. Figure 5: Distribution of the E-field quadupole component as a function of the cell number. The solid curve – re-quirements, asterisks – measurements. The regular X-ray radiation control along the RFQ permits to register pollution of electrodes by vapor com-ponents from the Ion Source [5]. The surge exhaust vol-ume putting into the LEBT of the RFQ and periodic RFconditioning for cleaning electrodes permitted to increasethe break-down limit in the structure up to450 kV/cm (3.4 kE). The RF power system The RF power is supplied in the resonator with external inductive coupling loop thro ugh the vacuum-tight ceramic window placed in the RF tank. It allows to excite theresonator both by the single final power amplifier andpower amplifier mounted on the resonator [6]. Fig.6 shows the block scheme of the RF transmission system. The resonator (R) is excited by the two-stage finalpower amplifier (FA) which is integrated with the RFvacuum tank (Fig.4). The symmetric coupling loop whichis an inductive shoulder of the anode circuit links the finalcascade (C2) with the resonator. The coupling loop isimmersed into the ceramic window (CrW). This link isequivalent to that which is provided via the multiple 2/π electric length feeder. The C2 was realized using the 12 triodes push-pull amplifier with common greed [7].The pre-amplifier cascade (C1) is inductively linked withFA and realized according the similar 2-triodes scheme[6]. The pre-exciter (PE) contains quarter-wave anodecircuit triodes amplifier cascades (A1), (A2). It is excitedby wide-band transistor amplifier (TA). The RF amplitudeand phase are controlled by high-speed phase shifter-attenuator (PSA) which is mounted at the TA entry. Theoperating frequency is generated by 0.5 W stabilizeddriver (SD). A maximum pulse power of the final ampli-fier is equal to 600 kW, anode voltage in FA − 12 kV, inPE − 6 kV. The modulator (M) forms 80 µs pulses of the anode voltage. A method of voltage addition in tiristorcells with pulse transformer help is used in the modulator.A compensation due to the beam load is provided by thePSA and modulator adjusting via a signal from the pro-grammed control system (PCS). Besides two-circuit sys-tems for an amplitude and phase automatic control (ACAand ACP) is under development. To increase the dynamicstabilization under action of the accelerated beam addi-tional adjusting circuit is used which is controlled by thesignal from the beam current pick-up (BCP). Figure 6: the RF block scheme. Beam measurements Measurements of beam parameters were carried out both in LEBT and HEBT lines. The injection system ofthe RFQ consists of the Ion Source and LEBT including2 matching solenoids and heavy masses separating colli-mators. The total LEBT length is equal to 620 mm. Formeasurements of the beam parameters the test stand wascreated. It includes beam diagnostics apparatus and auto-matic data acquisition system. To obtain a matched beamat the entry of the RFQ a number of measurements of abeam emittance in different points of LEBT are required.Adjusting Ion Source and LEBT parameters including theplasma emitter, two-gap optics and solenoids, permits usto approach required input parameters of the beam. Thisprocedures allows to obtain the output beam emittance,which is 1.5-2 times greater than calculated one. Fig.7shows measured 120 mA output beam emittance. Figure 7: Measured transverse beam emittance. Solid lines – are calculated ellipces.Conclusions The RFQ with permanently growing accelerating rate was created. It allows to obtain better matching with nextpart of the linac and decrease (1.5 times approximately)the RFQ length. Materials, technologies of manufacturing and assembly which were used permit to obtain the high vacuum( 8105−⋅ torr) and simplify the vacuum system. Efforts which were made against pollution of electrodes by Ion Source operation products and regular RF condi-tioning allowed to obtain high value of the breakdownlimit (3.4 kE). The new RF power system with final power amplifier integrated with the RF vacuum tank (Fig.4) was createdand tested. New modular concept was used in the highvoltage modulator. As a result it demonstrates a reliable5 Hz operation. References [1] Zherebtsov A.V et al., IHEP Preprint 90-29, – Prot- vino, 1990.[2] A.Zherebtsov. Using the 3D electric fields for calcu-lations of the RFQ parameters. Proceedings of the SecondInt. BDO Workshop, July 4-8 1995, St.Petersburg, Rus-sia.[3] Kapchinsky I. The theory of linear resonant accelera-tors: dynamics of particles. – M.: Energoizdat, 1982. [4] Abramov A.G. et al., IHEP preprint 83-3, Serpukhov,1983.[5] Belyaev O.K., Stepanov V.B. Proceedings of XVINat.ional Acc. Conf., Protvino,1998,v.1,p.228. Belyaev O.K. et al. IHEP preprint 2000-21, Protvino,2000.[6] Stepanov V.B. et al. “Acceleration of Polarized Pro-tons to 1 Tev in the Fermilab Tevatron”. Progress reportSPIN Collaboration, USA, Aug. 1, 1994, p.37-50.[7] Kisly O. Et al. Proceedings of XVI Nat.ional Acc.Conf., Protvino,1998,v.1,p.110

arXiv:physics/0008021v1 [physics.optics] 9 Aug 2000Inversionless gain in an optically-dense resonant Doppler-broadened medium A. K. Popov and S. A. Myslivets Institute for Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasno yarsk, 660036, Russia popov@ksc.krasn.ru Thomas F. George Office of the Chancellor / Departments of Chemistry and Physic s & Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Steven s Point, WI 54481-3897, USA tgeorge@uwsp.edu Abstract: Resonant nonlinear-optical interference processes in fou r- level Doppler-broadened media are studied. Specific featur es of amplifi- cation and optical switching of short-wavelength radiatio n in a strongly- absorbing resonant gas under coherent quantum control with two longer wavelength radiations, are investigated. The major outcom es are illus- trated with virtual experiments aimed at inversionless sho rt-wavelength amplification, which also address deficiencies in this regar d in recent ex- periments. With numerical simulations related to the propo sed exper- iment in optically-dense sodium dimer vapor, we show optima l condi- tion for optical switching and the expected gain of the probe radiation, which is above the oscillation threshold. c/circlecop†rt2008 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (020.1670) Coherent optical effects; (140.4480) Optical am plifiers; (190.4410) Nonlinear optics, parametric processes; (190. 4970) Parametric oscilla- tors and amplifiers; (190.5650) Raman effect; (190.7220) Upc onversion; (200.4740) Optical processing. References and links [†] Ossipov Russian Folk Orchestra, condacted by Nikolai Kali nin, “Ochi Chornyje” c/circlecop†rt1994 CD Ltd. [‡] Thomas F. George, piano, Michael Kaupa, trumpet/fl¨ ugelho rn, “Close Your Eyes” c/circlecop†rt1995 Hester Park, http://www.uwsp.edu/admin/chancellor/tgeorge/CDrevi ew.htm 1. M.O. Scully, “Resolving conumdrums in lasing without inv ersion via exact solutions to simple models” Quantum Optics 6, 203-215 (1994). 2. O. Kocharovskaya and P.Mandel, “Basic models of lasing wi thout inversion: General form of amplification condition and problem of self-consistency,” ibid., 217-230. 3. B. G. Levi, “Some benefits of quantum interference become t ransparent,” Physics Today 45, 17-19 (May 1992). 4. P. Mandel, “Lasing without inversion: a useful concept?” Contemp. Phys. 34, 235-246 (1993). 5. M. O. Scully and M. Fleischhauer, “Laser without inversio n,” Science 263, 337-338 (1994). 6. A. K. Popov and S. G. Rautian, ”Atomic coherence and interf erence phe- nomena in resonant nonlinear optical interactions” (invit ed paper), in Coherent Phenomena and Amplification without Inversion , A. V. Andreev, O. Kocharovskaya and P. Mandel, eds., Proc. SPIE 2798, 49-61 (1996), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005114 . 7. A. K. Popov, ”Inversionless amplification and laser-indu ced transparency at discrete transitions and the transitions to continuum” (review), Bull. Russ. Aca d. Sci., Physics 60, 927-945 (1996), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005108 . 8. S. E. Harris, “Electromagnetically induced transparenc y,” Physics Today 50, 36-42 (July 1997). 9. A. J. Merriam, S. J. Sharpe, H. Xia, D. Manuszak, G. Y. Yin, a nd S. E. Harris, “Efficient gas-phase generation of coherent vacuum ultraviolet radiation,” Opt . Lett. 24, 625-627 (1999).10. S. E. Harris and L. V. Hau, “Nonlinear optics in low light- levels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4611-4614 (1999). 11. S. E. Harris and Y. Yamamoto, “Photon switching by quantu m interference,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3611-3614 (1999. 12. M. D. Lukin, A. V. Matsko, M. Fleischhauer, and M.O. Scull y, “Quantum noise and correlations in resonantly enhanced wave mixing based on atomic coherenc e,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1847-1850 (1999). 13. U. Hinze, L.Meyer, B. N. Chichkov, E. Tiemann, and B. Well egehausen, “Continuous parametric amplification in a resonantly driven double-Λ system,” Opt. Commun. 166, 127-132 (1999). 14. A. K. Popov and S. A. Myslivets, “Resonant four-wave freq uency mixing in Doppler-broadened transitions,” Quantum Electron. 271004-1008 (1997), http://turpion.ioc.ac.ru/ . 15. A. K. Popov, “Interference at quantum transitions: lasi ng without inversion and resonant four- wave mixing in strong fields at Doppler-broadened transitio ns,” in Nonlinear Optics , Sergei G. Rautian, Igor M. Beterov and Natalia M. Rubtsova, eds., Proc . SPIE 3485, 252-263 (1998), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005118 . 16. T. Ya. Popova, A. K. Popov, S. G. Rautian, and R. I. Sokolov skii, “Nonlinear interference effects in emission, absorption, and generation spectra,” JETP 30, 466 (1970) [Translated from Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 57850, (1969)], http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005094 . 17. T. Ya. Popova, A. K. Popov, “Effect of resonance radiative processes on the amplification factor,” Zhurn.Prikl. Spektrosk., 12, No 6, 989, (1970) [Translated in Engl.: Journ. Appl. Spectr 12, No 6, 734, (1970), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005047 . 18. T. Ya. Popova, A. K. Popov, “Shape of the amplification lin e corresponding to an adjacent tran- sition in a strong field,” Izv.Vysh. Uchebn. Zaved., Fizika N o 11, 38, (1970) [Translated in Engl.: Soviet Phys. Journ. 13, No 11, 1435, (1970)], http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0005049 . 19. A. K. Popov, Introduction in Nonlinear Spectroscopy , Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1983, 274p. (in Russ). 20. I. M. Beterov, “Investigation on nonlinear resonant int eraction of optical fields in three-level gas laser,” Cand. Sci. Dissertation, Institute of Semiconduct or Physics SD USSR AS, Novosibirsk, Dec. 1970. 21. A. K. Popov, S. A. Myslivets, E. Tiemann, B. Wellegehause n and G. Tartakovsky, “Quantum interference and Manley-Rowe relations at resonant four-w ave mixing in optically-thick Doppler- broadened Media,” JETP Lett. 69, 912-16 (1999), http://ojps.aip.org/jetplo/ . 1 Introduction Coherent quantum control (CQC) of optical processes have pr oven to be a powerful tool to manipulate refraction, absorption, transparency, gain and conversion of electro- magnetic radiation (for a review, see [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]). Among recent achieve- ments are the slowing down of the light group speed to a few m/s , highly-efficient frequency conversion, squeezed quantum state light source s and optical switches for quantum information processing [9, 10, 11, 12]. Much intere st has been shown in the physics and diverse practical schemes of amplification with out inversion (AWI). This present paper is aimed at studying nonlinear coherence and i nterference effects (NIE) underlying an approach which accounts for the specific featu res of Doppler broadening of coherently-driven quantum transitions and the inhomoge neous distribution of the power saturated material parameters along the medium. Spec ial emphasis is placed on NIE processes, which would allow converting easily-achiev able long-wavelength gain to a higher- frequency interval. Another outcome is the realiz ation of the optical switching of the medium from opaque to amplifying via a transparent sta te by small variation of the intensity or frequency of one of the coupled radiations. Important features of both the signal and idle radiation produced with the aid of the pro posed scheme entail the suppression of quantum noise. We propose potential experim ents towards inversionless generation and optical switch based on CQC. The potential an d optimum conditions for the realization of such effects in an optically-dense Dop pler-broadened medium are explored.l n g m ω1 ω3ω4ω2 Fig. 1. Energy levels and coupled fields. 2 Resonance coherence and interference processes at Dopple r broadened transitions: propagation features and parametric gain A typical coupling schematic relevant to the topics under di scussion and to the exper- imental situation [13] is depicted in Fig. 1. A weak probe rad iation E4at frequency ω4propagates through an optically-dense Doppler-broadened medium controlled with two longer-wavelength driving radiations E1andE3atω1andω3. All waves are co- propagating. Owing to four-wave mixing (FWM), the probe wav e generates radiation atω2=ω1+ω3−ω4at the transition gn, where the driving field E1easily produces a large Stokes gain. Alternatively, the enhanced generated r adiation E2contributes back toE4due to FWM, which dramatically changes the propagation feat ures of the probe field. Therefore, the problem under consideration reduces t o the solution of a set of the coupled equations for the four waves ( Ei/2) exp[ i(kiz−ωit)] +c.c.(i= 1...4), traveling in a optically-thick medium: dE4,2(z)/dz =iσ4,2E4,2+i˜σ4,2E1E3E∗ 2,4, (1) dE1,3(z)/dz =iσ1,3E1,3+i˜σ1,3E4E2E∗ 3,1. (2) Hereω4+ω2=ω1+ω3,kjare wave numbers in a vacuum, σj=−2πkjχj=δkj+iαj/2, αjandδkjare intensity-dependent absorption indices and dispersio n parts of the wave numbers, ˜ σ4=−2πk4˜χ4(etc.) is a FWM cross-coupling parameter, and χjand ˜χj are the corresponding nonlinear susceptibilities dressed by the driving fields. An am- plification or absorption of any of the coupled radiations in fluences the propagation features of the other ones. In the the approximation that a ch ange of the driving ra- diations E1,3along the medium is neglected (for example, at the expense of the satu- ration effects), the system (1)-(2) reduces to two coupled st andard equations of non- linear optics for E4andE2, whereas the medium parameters are homogeneous along z. If ∆ k=δk1+δk3−δk2−δk4= 0, the input values I4,2≡ |E4,2|2atz= 0 are I20= 0, I40/negationslash= 0 and the absorption (gain) rate substantially exceeds tha t of the nonlin- ear optical conversion we obtain at the exit of the medium of t he length L: I4/I40=|exp(−α4l/2) + (γ2/(2β)2)[exp( g2L/2)−exp(−α4L/2)]|2. (3) Alternatively, if I40= 0, I20/negationslash= 0, η4=I4/I20= (|γ4|2/(2β)2)|exp(g2L/2)−exp(−α4L/2)|2. (4) Hereγ2=γ∗ 2γ4,γ4,2=χ4,2E1E3,β= (α4−α2)/4, (|γ2|/β2≪1), and g2≡ −α2. From (3) and (4) it follows that at relatively small lengths t he FWM coupling may even increase the depletion rate of the probe radiation, dependi ng on the signs of Imγ4,2and Reγ4,2. In order to achieve amplification, large optical lengths Land significant Stokes gain on the transition gn(exp(g2L/2)≫ |(2β)2/γ2|), as well as effective FWM both at ω2andω4, are required.The important feature of the considered far-from-degenera te interaction is that the magnitude and sign of single-photon and multiphoton resona nce detunings and, conse- quently, of the amplitudes and phases of nonlinear polariza tions, differ for molecules at different velocities due to the difference in their frequency Doppler shifts. Their interfer- ence determined by the interference of elementary quantum p athways, and accounting for Maxwell’s velocity distribution and saturation effects , results in a nontrivial depen- dence of the material macroscopic parameters on the intensi ties of the driving fields and on the frequency detunings from the Doppler-broadened reso nances. The relevant solu- tions for elements of the density matrix, and consequently f or the material parameters in the ED equations (1) and (2), are cumbersome. They are prov ided in [14, 15], where the solution is found exactly with respect to E1,3and in the first approximation for E4,2. The various relaxation processes, Boltzmann excitation of the level n, distribution over rotational sub-levels and dependence on the molecule veloc ity were taken into account. This allows numerical averaging over the Maxwell velocity d istribution as well as further virtual experiments. These formulas are used here for analy sis of the dependence of the quantities α4,2andγ4,2on the intensities and frequencies of the fields and also to ob tain a numerical solution of the system (1)–(2) which accounts fo r the inhomogeneity of the coefficients and phase mismatch ∆ k. 3 Numerical simulations The numerical simulations are done for the transitions l−g−n−m−l(Fig. 1) attributed to those of sodium dimers [ Na2:X′Σ+ g(v” = 0 , J” = 45) −A′Σ+ u(6,45)(λ1= 655 nm)−X1Σ+ g(14,45)(λ2= 756 nm)−B1Πu(5,45)(λ3= 532 nm)−X′Σ+ g(0,45)(λ4= 480 nm)] from the experiment [13] and using experimental relaxati on data. The Doppler width of the transition (FWHM) at the wavelength λ4= 480 nmat a temperature of about 450◦C is approximately equal to 1.7 GHz. Then the Boltzmann popul ation of levelnis about 2% of that of level l. The driving radiations are set at exact resonance with the corresponding transitions (Ω 1=ω1−ωgl= 0,Ω3=ω3−ωmn= 0) and are characterized by the coupling Rabi frequencies G1=E1dlg/2¯handG3=E3dnm/2¯h. The resonant condition results in strong depletion of the dr iving radiation E1along the medium. We scale the length of the medium Lto the absorption length L4= 1/α40at Ω4=ω4−ωml= 0, with all driving fields turned off. Figures 2(a-c) and the movie mov1a.mov and mov1b.mov displa y changes in the spectral dependencies of the velocity averaged material pa rameters with variation of the driving fields. Figure 2(a) is generated for the input Rabi fr equencies G10= 60 MHz and G30= 20 MHz. It displays substantial Autler-Townes splitting o f the Stokes lineshape with minimum gain in the resonance. Corresponding quantum i nterference structures appear in the absorption and FWM coupling parameters, which behave quite differently. As it is shown below, maximum gain I4(L)/I40occurs at L/L40= 15, where the driving fields deplete down to G1= 16 MHz and G3= 19 MHz. This gives rise to a dramatic change in the spectral properties of absorption (upper plot ), of the Stokes gain (lower plot) and of the FWM coupling parameters γ4,2(Fig. 2b). Due to the interplay of the quantum interference processes and population cycling in t he strong fields, absorption at the resonance becomes even larger than in the unperturbed medium. Figure 2(c), computed for G1= 60 MHz and G3= 80, displays further feasibility to manipulate material parameters with quantum coherence and interferen ce processes. Figure 3 ( a-c) and the movies mov2a.mov and mov2b.mov display AWI in an opti cally-thick Doppler- broadened medium controlled with injected coherence. Figu re 3(a) corresponds to the input intensities, selected for the Fig. 2(a). It shows a sub stantial gain, provided by the right choice of the optimum optical length and resonance detunings. The virtual experiment displays no gain in the resonance. Due to the inte rplay of the absorption,−202(a) G1=60 MHz α4/α40 α2/α40 −0.500.5 Re γ4/α40 Re γ2/α40 −0.5 −0.25 0 0.25 0.5−0.500.5Im γ4/α40 Im γ2/α40 Ω4, GHz(b) −202G1=16 MHz α4/α40 α2/α40 −0.500.5 Re γ4/α40 Re γ2/α40 −0.5 −0.25 0 0.25 0.5−0.500.5Im γ4/α40 Im γ2/α40 Ω4, GHz(c) −202G3=80 MHz α4/α40 α2/α40 −0.500.5 Re γ4/α40 Re γ2/α40 −0.5 −0.25 0 0.25 0.5−0.500.5Im γ4/α40 Im γ2/α40 Ω4, GHz Fig. 2. Intensity-dependent absorption index for the signa l radiation, Stokes ampli- fication index for the idle radiation and real and imaginary p arts of the FWM cross coupling parameters vs signal frequency resonance detunin g. The driving fields are set to the resonance. ( a) and ( b) – mov1a.mov (2.02MB, audio†) (G3= 20 MHz, G1 varies); ( c) – mov1b.mov (2.03MB, audio†) (G1= 60 MHz, G3varies). The current magnitude of the variable Rabi frequency runs at the top of th e screen. (a) −100−500501000 10 20 30036912 L/L4G3=20 MHz Ω4I4 / I40(b) −60−30030600 10 2002468 L/L4G1=45 MHz Ω4I4 / I40(c) −100−500501000 10 20 30036912 L/L4G3=80 MHz Ω4I4 / I40 Fig. 3. Inversionless gain in optically thick Doppler-broa dened medium. aandc– mov2b.mov (1.50MB, audio‡)(G10= 60 MHz, G30varies); b– mov2a.mov (1.54MB, audio‡)(G30= 20 MHz, G10varies). The current magnitudes of the variable Rabi frequency are displayed at the top of the screen. Stokes gain and FWM processes as well as depletion of the driv ing radiation along the medium, the optimum detuning does not correspond to that for the maximum Stokes amplification index at the entrance of the cell (Fig. 2(a)). F igure 3(b) is generated at the minimum input driving intensities required to get the mediu m transparent. Figure 3(c), which corresponds to the input intensities used for computi ng Fig. 2(c), shows that an increase in the intensity of the driving field E3even decreases the output signal radiation. It is important to note that a very sharp change in the output s ignal at small variation 303540455000.10.20.30.40.50.60.7 Ω4, MHzI4/I4040608000.40.8 G10, MHz Fig. 4. Optical switch. of the frequency or the medium length (see, e.g., Fig. 3(a)) o r the driving intensities (see the movies mov2a.mov and mov2b.mov) in properly-chose n intervals give rise to dramatic change in the intensity of the transmitted signal. This allows one to realizeoptical switching, based on quantum coherence processes. A s examples, the upper inset in Fig. 4 is derived from the movies mov2a.mov and mov2b.mov f orG30= 20 MHz, Ω4= 37 MHz and L/L40= 3, and the main plot for G10= 60 MHz and G30= 20 MHz ( L/L40= 4). The minimum transmission is below 1%. The graphs also sh ow that near the entrance of the cell, parametric coupling even incr eases the rate of depletion of the probe radiation. Figure 5 presents numerical analysis o f the experiment [13]. In the (a)012311.21.41.61.82I2/I20 L/L4012300.02012301 I1 / I10 I2 / I40 (b)0123024I4/I40 L/L4012300.51 (c)0 10 2004812 I4/I40 L/L40102001 0102000.51I1 / I10 (d)0 10 2001020304050I2/I40 L/L40102000.250.5 Fig. 5. Numerical simulation of the experiment [13] – ( a) and ( b), and of the proposed experiment towards inversionless gain – ( c) and ( d). experiment all four fields were set in corresponding resonan ces, the input Rabi frequency at the Stokes transition being about 10 times larger than the probe one. This was in turn assumed for computing Figs.5(a) and 5(b). The upper inset in Fig. 5(a) depicts depletion of the driving radiation E1(G10= 12 MHz, G30= 7 MHz), at the the optical length, corresponding to the experimental value. The computed gain of the Stokes beam (main plot in Fig. 5(a)) as well as that for the probe radiation (mai n plot in Fig. 5(b)) are in a good agreement with the experimental data. This simulation is aimed at demonstrating that the gain of the probe radiation is derived from FWM with n o contribution of the parametric amplification. Parametric amplification in the c onditions of this experiment could be achieved by turning off the input Stokes radiation. I ndeed, in this case only depletion of the probe radiation (lower inset inset in Fig. 5 (b)) and weak output Stokes intensity (lower inset in Fig. 5(a)) come out from the same nu merical simulations. The main plots in the Figs, 5(c,d) are to propose favorable co nditions for inver- sionless amplification. These plots are generated for the in put driving Rabi frequencies G10= 60 MHz, G30= 30 MHz and for the near optimum detuning Ω 4= 35 MHz. The main plot in Fig. 5(c) displays substantial inversionle ss amplification, and in Fig. 5(d), generated idle radiation under relatively low input i ntensities. For the selected transitions a characteristic value of the Rabi frequency of about 80 MHz approximately corresponds to radiation powers in the interval 100 to 200 mW focused on a spot with sizes of about a few parts of a millimeter. In the same conditi ons, but for the probe field tuned to the resonance (at Ω 4= 0), gain does not exist and generated idle radiation dramatically decreases (upper insets in Figs. 5(c,d)). All the above presented simula- tions account for phase mismatch stipulated from the detuni ngs. Both probe and idle radiations are supposed to be weak and unperturbative. NIE as an origin of the difference in the rates of induced trans itions from upper and lower levels and consequently – of AWI were discussed in r ef. [16]. The optimum conditions and features of AWI were explored and numericall y illustrated for three level Vscheme of neon transitions in ref. [17, 18, 19]. Related expe riments and evidence of AWI were reported in ref. [20] (for review of the later works s ee ref. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]). In order to simplify the proposed experiment we do not assume here a source of incoherent excitation of the medium (the formulas accounti ng for such excitation are provided in ref. [14, 15]). Therefore the energy acquired by the probe field here is takenentirely from the driving fields. However we call the effect as inversionless gain, derived from the quantum coherence and interference processes, rat her than optical parametric amplification. This is due to the fact that the discussed ampl ification effect can not be thought as the result of the consequent separate elementary effects of absorption, FWM, Stokes gain and back FWM giving rise to OPA. We want to stress t hat consideration of these processes separately in a resonant medium is not ade quate for the physics of the interference process and, as it has been shown in [21], would result even in qualitatively wrong predictions. The proposed approach ba sed on NIE increases number of the interfering channels for the energy conversion inclu ding those through populating of the excited levels, modified Raman-type and parametric pr ocesses. 4 Conclusion In conclusion, this paper considers various optical proces ses in four-level Doppler-broa- dened media, controlled with laser injected coherence. The scheme of inversionless am- plification and optical switching of short-wavelength radi ation in strongly-absorbing resonant four-level gas is proposed. They are controlled wi th two driving fields at longer wavelengths and become possible due to the optical parametr ic coupling and readily- achievable Stokes gain. Optimal conditions for the experim ent on sodium dimer vapor and the expected gain are explored with the aid of numerical s imulations. The relevant driving intensities correspond to focused cw radiation on t he order of several tens of mW, i.e., to about one photon per thousand molecules. The ana lysis shows that further increase of the driving Rabi frequencies up to about 100-200 MHz allows one to achieve the gain above the threshold of mirror-less self-oscillati on. AKP thanks B. Wellegehausen and B. Chichkov for stimulating discussions. We thank the U.S. National Research Council - National Academy of Sciences for support of this research through the international Collaboration i n Basic Science and Engi- neering program. AKP and SAM acknowledge funding support fr om the International Association of the European Community for the promotion of c o-operation with scien- tists from the New Independent States of the former Soviet Un ion (grant INTAS-99-19) and Russian Foundations for Basic Research (grant 99-02-39 003) and from the Center on Fundamental Natural Sciences at St. Petersburg Universi ty (grant 97-5.2-61).

NEW TASKS AND NEW CODES FOR RFQ BEAM SIMULATION Boris Bondarev, Alexander Durkin, Stanislav Vinogradov, Igor Shumakov Moscow Radiotechnical Institute RAS 132, Warshavskoe Shosse, Moscow, Russia, 113519 lidos@aha.ru INTRODUCTION Proton linear accelerator is the base Accelerator Driven Power System (ADS). Such ADS are dedicated to various purposes: weapon plutonium conversion, "energy amplifier", transmutation of radionuclear wastes etc. Solution of these tasks requires proton beams with energy 1 GeV and average current up to 30 mA. At the moment there are no problems of fundamental nature in such linac construction. The main problems have economic and technical aspects. Problems of CW linac will be demonstrated on the base beam dynamics requirements. New code package LIDOS.RFQ.Designer makes possible to simulate beam dynamics in RF fields of real vane shape (including gaps between RFQ section) as well as to determine channel parameters tolerances for reliable operation .. 1. NEW UNIQUE CODES LIDOS.RFQ.DESIGNER New criteria arise when high-current CW linacs are considered. The main requirements for such linacs are maximal RF intensity reduction very small beam losses. In such cases the traditional algorithms of RFQ designing can lead to undesired versions of the RFQ linac. Minimization of CW beam losses in RFQ linac places more stringent requirements upon beam perturbations . Instrumental errors in vane manufacturing, installation and adjustment are sources of such perturbations. Even with very small cell parameter deviations the potential of such perturbations is high enough both for beam transmission reduction and beam quality degradation. A reason enough to such statement is provided by the fact that trajectories even for "ideal" (without perturbations) RFQ channel are spaced in the immediate vicinity of vane surfaces. Gaps between RFQ sections are another sources of perturbations. The gaps divided RFQ channel into several sections are dictated by parasitic mode suppression. Focusing RF field reduction inside gap and in the adjacent area leads to beam mismatching, growths of beam size and emittance. Accelerating field change leads to local reduction of accelerating efficiency and to appearance of beam coherent phase oscillations. In order to avoid additional gap it is necessary to “insert” a gap not as additional channel segment but as a substitution ofregular channel segment. By other words a regular RFQ cell is substitute by “cell” with gap. In this case phase length of cell is distinguished from its nominal value only by small amount (caused by difference in RF field amplitudes). New concepts for parameter choices based on optimization methods and taken into account real RF fields are incorporated in the new multilevel codes [1,2]. There are two main features: a maximum of scientific visualization for each calculation step and the possibility to cut off undesired linac versions long before the time- consuming calculations start. The package contains codes with three levels of mathematical model complexity. The first-level codes make only a preliminary choice of the main parameter arrays on the basis of a simplified physical model. These codes are richly supplied with visual information that helps to find the best linac version quickly. Separate algorithm branch allows using output parameter table obtained by PARMTEQ codes as initial information The second-level codes are used for channel data calculations with the real shape of the RFQ vanes and real RF fields. Information from the first level codes is used here as input data. The third-level codes are based on information from the first and second level codes and on complex PIC- models that are needed for a correct beam simulation in the chosen channel version. The package gives users additional possibilities in comparison with existing codes (PARMTEQ and so on). In the frame of new codes it is possible to: • calculate RF field mesh values taking into account vane real shape and gap inserting, • simulate beam motion in calculated RF fields taking into account field perturbations caused by instrumental errors in vane manufacturing, installation and adjustment (including cases with symmetry violation), • make statistical analysis of output parameter degradation. 2. CALCULATIONS IN FAVOR OF IPHI RFQ AS DEMONSTRATION OF CODE POWER The code tools described above were used for RFQ designing in favor of IPHI Project (CEA, France) [3].Below the main results are presented to demonstrate new code power. The following parameters were preset: Accelerating Particles Protons Input Energy 0.095 MeV Output Energy 5 MeV Beam Current 100 mA Beam Emittance 0.15π cm·mrad Operating Frequency 352 MHz There were some restrictions and requirements: Kilpatrick Factor no more than 1.6 Maximum RF Field Intensity less than 29.5-30 MV/m Length about 8 m Beam Transmission no less then 90% Power of Lost Particles no more than 1.5 kW Minimum of Lost Particles With Energy more then 3 MeV 3. POSSIBLE TYPES OF PERTURBATION Random errors independently arising in each cell are the most danger. In this case there is a possibility of unfavorable realization with each next cell amplifying disturbances of all previous ones. Analytical theory for transverse size statistic estimation as well as for emittance growth by the action of random perturbation was generated early [4,5]. The same methods regarding to RFQ channel are given below. 3.1. Random Deviation of Focusing Field Gradient Let us consider that errors of focusing field gradient are caused by random deviations of cell aperture radius. In this case probability distribution function has a form P(QT)=1-exp(-( lnQT)2/(2ND2) Where P(QT) is probability of effective emittance growth no more then times QT times. It follows, that the effective emittance growth coefficient will not be exceed the a limit with the probability p, if tolerances are defined by the equation )p1ln(2)a(lnN2 2 −−=Δ The next relation can be used for practical estimates 2 02 min2 max 02 8 Rxx EWeU +=Δgl where W0 is ion rest energy , E is beam emittance , xmax and xmin are maximal and minimal values of matched beam envelope, U is intervane voltage, l is wave length of RF field.3.2. Displacement of the Focusing Channel Axis. Random displacements of focusing elements with s as rms value give rise to rms-displacement D of the beam center described by the relation 2 2 2sNG=Δ where 2 0min max 02 2 Rxx EWeUG+=gl In this case, the transverse motion amplitude is a random value distributed by the following law ( )22/ exp1)( Δ−−= x xF The Monte-Carlo simulations were performed with the aim to estimate how possible deviations of accelerating and focusing fields can be differed the output beam parameters. Change in averaged radius position for each cell was considered as perturbation factor. It was assumed that averaged radius inside cell varies linearly. The random value distributed uniformly inside [-δr, δr] was added to top value of cell averaged radius. Random values for different cells were chosen independently. Beam simulations were performed for δr =10 ìm and δr =25 ìm. The code package described above was made statistical data processing. Beam energy losses, phase width, momentum spread, transverse size, beam center displacement, beam rms and total emittances were calculated as integral characteristics. These values were integrated over all particles inside one RF period. Phase space area occupied by all macroparticles was nominated as total emittance. Random displacements of RFQ section ends were study separately. In this case RFQ axis was presented as four straight-line segments with displacement amplitude är = 100 µm. The number of random realizations is 50 for each type of errors. In the next tables more intrusting results for three types of random errors are presented. 00.511.522.533.544.55 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 ProbabilityLost Particle Energy, kWCell tolerance of 10 mkm Cell tolerance of 25 mkm Section displac. of 100 mkm Fig.1. Lost Particle Total Energy (In Ideal Channel Lost Particle Total Energy Equals 0.134 kW)0123456 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 ProbabilityUnaccelerated particle, %Cell tolerance of 10 mkm Cell tolerance of 25 mkm Section displac. of 100 mkm Fig.2. Unaccelerated Particles (in %) vs probability. Ideal Value equals 1.68%. 11.11.21.31.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 ProbabilityR/R0Cell tolerance of 10 mkm Cell tolerance of 25 mkm Section displac. of 100 mkm Fig.3. Beam transverse sizes R/R 0 (on per-unit basis). Ideal Value equals 1.00 In general it can be stated that δr = 10 µm are acceptable whereas δr = 25µm are dangerous. In order to suppress parasitic oscillations eight meters long IPHI RFQ cavity must divide on eight one meter long sections with gaps between them. Each even gap is small and its length equals 0.1 mm. Each odd gap is major and its length equals 2.2 mm. The ends of gaps have a curvature of elliptic form. The effects caused by RF field distortions in intersection gaps have revealed by consideration different RFQ versions that differ by gap number and gap center position. For comparison it were considered versions with gap center placed at cell end (E-versions) and with gap center placed in the point where all field components acting on equilibrium particle are equal to zero (F- versions). It is expected that in the last case beam output parameters will be nearer to nominal ones (without gaps) then in the first case. The main parameters of output beam are shown inTable 1. Number of gaps and their position (E or F) are used for model version notation. RF field maximal surface intensity inside gap, Eg, RF field maximal surface intensity in the same cell without gap, En, ratio of the above values and RF field maximal surface intensity in Kilpatrick units (Ek = 18.43 ÌV/m) are listed in Table 2. Table 2 Major Gap Eg En Eg/En Eg/Ek 1 (2m) 33.9 30.95 1.1 1.84 2 (4m) 35.0 31.9 1.1 1.9 3 (6m) 36.8 32.6 1.13 2.0 The main conclusion that can be made on the base of obtained results is the following: presence of gaps with length no more then 2.2 mm and curvature by ellipsoid with semi-axis az = 2 mm and ar = 0.75 mm does not lead to degradation of output beam parameters if gap center is placed in the point where all field components acting on equilibrium particle are equal to zero (F-versions). In this case RMS emittance growth equals 4 %. In the case when field components acting on equilibrium particle are relatively high (gap center is placed at cell end, F- versions) RMS- emittance growth equals 12 %. In all cases the first gap influence is mainly responsible. REFERENCES [1] B.Bondarev , A.Durkin , S.Vinogradov . Multilevel Codes RFQ.3L for RFQ Designing. Computational Accelerator Physics Conference, AIP Conference Proceedings 391 , pp.349-354, (Virginia, USA, September 1996). [2] B.Bondarev, A.Durkin, S.Vinogradov , J-M.Lagniel, R.Ferdinand, CW RFQ Designing Using The LIDOS.RFQ Codes , Proceedings of the XIX International Linac Conference , August 23-28, 1998 Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp.502-504. [3] R.Ferdinand, J- M.Lagniel, P.Mattei, S.Nath “Optimization of RFQ Design”, Proceeding of EPAC- 98 Conference , June 22-26 Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 1106-1108 [4] B.I.Bondarev, A.P.Durkin, B.P.Murin, L.Yu.Soloviev "Random Perturbation of the Transverse Motion of Protons in a Linear Accelerator and Their Correction", Particle Accelerators, 1974, Vol.6, N 1, pp.27-40. [5] B.P.Murin, B.I.Bondarev, A.P.Durkin "An Approach to the Design of a Robust Focusing Channel. Proceeding of Linac-92 Conference , August 1992, Ottawa, Canada, pp 731-733. Table 1 Channel ModelTotal transm., %Acc. particle transm, %Lost particle power, kWNon accel. particle power, kWrms- emittance Erx, mm⋅mradrms emittance Ery, mm⋅mradTotal emittance Etx, mm⋅mradTotal emittance Ety, mm⋅mrad No gaps 98.2 95.3 0.27 0.83 0.25 0.25 2.51 2.53 7E 96.5 92.7 2.82 1.04 0.31 0.31 4.07 3.99 7F 97.7 94.1 0.32 1.08 0.27 0.27 3.08 3.04

RFQ PARAMETER CHOICE BY MULTI-PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION Boris I. Bondarev, Alexander P. Durkin Moscow Radiotechnical Institute RAS, 132, Warshavskoe shosse, Moscow, Russia, 113519 lidos@aha.ru Experts in different accelerator laboratories accumulated wide experience in RFQ designing. Nevertheless new tasks on high-power, high-energy CW linac designing (for example, for ADT applications) were appeared recently. Such accelerators must be practically free of beam losses. This main condition placed more stringent requirements upon beam quality at the input of each linac part. Because RFQ is used as beginning part in above accelerators beam high-quality requirements is related to RFQ primarily. It means that existing experience in RFQ designing must be enriching by new approaches and new methodology. Both acceleration and focusing inside RFQ are governed by smooth variation of four parameters: amplitude of vane modulation, intervane voltage, synchronous phase and bore aperture. Experience shows that RFQ channel can be arbitrarily divided into three parts: adiabatic buncher (where beam is bunching and accelerated by small accelerating fields and synchronous phase near to –900), shaper (where smooth transition to nominal accelerating field and nominal synchronous phase take place) and proper accelerator. Lengths of RFQ parts and RFQ parameter variations are determined by the trial-and-error method. The process is labor-intensive and depends on a choice of the first approximation. The mathematical methods of many-p arametric optimization (as applied to charge particle beam dynamics) were developed at present time. In principle, they give a possibility to solve problem of RFQ optimization. The principle of mathematical optimization consists in choice of optimization criteria, choice of control parameters and choice of exhaustive method. The possible criteria of optimization for RFQ channel designing can be: minimal length of RFQ channels and beam transmission no less then given one. Vane modulation, intervane voltage, synchronous phase and bore aperture in each cell can be used as control parameters. But such optimization method is possible in principle but it cannot be realized in practice. If we make an attempt to realize optimization procedure in form described above a failure is guaranteed. Time needed to solve the procedure will be astronomical large because control parameter number are more then thousand. It must be added that time for one RFQ version simulation is measured by minutes. Modern computer techniques have no power to make such optimization. It means that simplified model for RFQ beam acceleration and focusing is needed. This model must, from one side, hardly reduce control parameter number and, from another side, give equivalent description ofbeam motion. Below we propose a model that allows to separate longitudinal motion optimization from transverse motion one. Let us consider beam longitudinal motion. It declares by following equation ) cos()cos()(20 022 skz krIWeUk dzdj wts t+ = , (1) where ct=t , U - is intervane voltage , L kp2= , L is modulation period , eand W0 are particle charge and rest energy, lpw2= , l is RF wave length , ris distance between particle and channel axis , )()(1 0 022 mkaIkaImm +−=s . The non-relativistic approximation 1≅g is used. Let us resolve RF field into two travelling harmonics and average over harmonics kz+wt , we receive an equation ) cos(4022 skzWeUk dzdj wts t+− = . For synchronous particle kz+wt . Let us introduce variable )(szzkkz −=−=wty . Taking lbsL= and using equations for sb and szz−, we obtain ( ) 0 ) cos(cos2 02 2=∂∂−+ − Ω−′′+′′+′′ yyj j y y yt tt tc s sU Wek LL LL , where 2 024 LWeUTp=Ω , sp 4=T , cU is Coulomb field potential . Using relations s LLjwcos2Ω=&, 22 2 2 )cos()(cos cos)()( s s s UTUT LLjwjwjwtt tΩ−′Ω+′ Ω=′′ and taking WWnh2 02Ω=Ω , where nW and W are input and current energies of particles , 2max 2 0)(2 lp nWUTe=Ω , max)(UTUT=h. If we convert to independent variable t z0Ω=, we finally obtainEquation (2) together with synchronous particle equation s nWWj hwcos2)(0Ω=′ (3) determines longitudinal motion in RFQ channel in equivalent travelling wave approximation . If optimization is made only by Eqs (2) and (3), then final results can be obtained with high defocusing parameters and very small transverse acceptance. It means that restriction on defocusing parameter must be added to Eqs (2) è (3) AWWA sn def≤Ω= j hwsin )(220 (4) Parameter A usually lies in the range of A = 0.01 – 0 .015. In travelling wave approximation we see that longitudinal motion is determined only by one given parameter w k 0Ω= and by laws of h and sj variations . We propose to calculate longitudinal component of Coulomb field as ones for cylinder with constant radius and with uniform distribution in each transverse crossection. In longitudinal direction periodical modulation take place along axis Z . In this case each macroparticle can be presented as uniform charge disc. One hundred discs are enough for reliable estimates. If U~ is Coulomb field potential with charge unit in beam , then Coulomb term in Eq. (3) has a form ya∂∂U WWn~ )(23 , where max 0)(UTcI nbea= . If high-current beam is accelerated , then this beam must not be pinched in longitudinal direction in optimal mode. In this case new limitation that demands monotonic variation of rms beam width 2 jΔ. In ideal this limitation looks as 02 ≤Δ zj dd (5) In order to finish definition of optimization task for longitudinal motion it is needed to parameterize functions )(zh and )(zjs. As far as there are no oscillations with frequency w in external force it is enough to define several plot points and intermediate point values determine by interpolation (linear in the simplest cases). In practice, 20 points is enough.So longitudinal motion optimization can be reduced to search values of functions )(zh and )(zjs in number of extraction points in order to solve Eqs (2) and (3) with limitations (4) and (5) and obtain version satisfied given criteria. Let us consider transverse motion optimization. Let us suppose that longitudinal motion optimization by above scheme was successful. As a result we obtain functions )(zh and )(zjs. Using relations between variable z and cell number kz2=n , we obtain for each cell values )()(nTnU , )(nsj , )(nAdef and factor of density increasing by beam bunching )(nq connected with rms values of beam width. Now we are needed to find optimal values of intervane voltage U(n) and aperture a(n) or mean radius )(0nR. It is known that focusing period in RFQ is defined by three parameters: focusing parameter  (proportional to 2 0RU), defocusing parameter defA and Coulomb parameter proportional to eqI. Here 0R is value near to mean radius, I is beam current, e is beam emittance . For ideal form of vane shape - ))(1(02 2 0kaI aR s− = . Each parameter triplet (if it placed inside stability zone) is corresponded to matched radius r maximal over period. Relation 2 0 2R re Ε= defines transverse channel acceptance . We know values for defocusing and Coulomb factors obtained by longitudinal motion calculation. Because RF field intensity is limited by some value then value 0RUis also limited by bE. Using maximal value we obtain that focusing factor is proportional to 0REb. Both values r and 0R are decreased with focusing parameter growth. Value )(~0nR corresponds to maximal acceptance and is quest optimal value. By next step we find )(~)( 0nREnU b= , )())(()(~nUnUTnT= , and find m(n) and a(n) on base of Ò and0R. Transverse motion calculations were not needed if we use proposed optimization method . Instead, it is enough to find periodical solution for channel envelope in each cell.( ) (2) 0 ) cos( cos)cos ()(cos cos cos 2 2 0022 0 0 0 0 =∂∂ Ω−+ − −−   Ω−′Ω+′Ω+′Ω+′′ yjy j hy j hwj hwhjwyj hwy c s snsn sn sn sn U Wek WWWW WW WW WWSo proposed method gives a possibility to use mathematical methods of multi-parametric optimization. Only values of two parameters in chosen points must be found and only longitudinal motion equations (2), (3) must be solved with limitations (4), (5), using only small number of particles and fast calculation of Coulomb attraction. Optimization was based on simple model but main components of external forces and linear component of Coulomb forces are taken into account. Of course it cannot be advocated that optimal solution will be kept when other factors will be taken into account. Nevertheless it can be assumed that it will be near to optimal. If obtained optimal solution will be used as initial approximation then procedure of further “hand” optimization will be not time consumed.At present time code package for RFQ optimization is generated in the frame of ISTC Project # 912. In future it will insert into LIDOS.RFQ.Designer as its part [1]. If using of proposed optimization method will be successful then it will be possible to generate data base for optimal functions )(zh and )(zjs and each twosome of k and a values . In this case initial approximation choice will be simpler. REFERENCES [1] B.I.Bondarev , A.P.Durkin , S.V.Vinogradov , I.V.Shumakov “New Tasks and New Codes for RFQ Beam Simulation”, this Conference.

arXiv:physics/0008024 v2 11 Aug 2000MEASUREMENTS OF RF CAVITY VOLTAGES BY X-RAY SPECTRU M MEASUREMENTS J P Duke, A P Letchford and D J S Findlay, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX, England Abstract Measurement of the endpoints of X-ray spectra emitt ed from RF cavities is a useful non-invasive technique for measuring peak voltages within the cavities. The matching of calculated X-ray spectra to measured sp ectra is described, with emphasis upon the endpoint regio n. 1 INTRODUCTION The peak voltage reached within an RF cavity is one of the most important parameters of the cavity. But s uch voltages can be difficult to measure, since the int roduction of probes generally changes electromagnetic field distributions and alters the voltage being measured . However, X-rays generated by the stopping in metal electrodes of stray electrons accelerated across vo ltage gaps are unaffected by local electromagnetic fields , and can easily escape through the cavity walls to be de tected outside. X-rays can therefore be used for non-inva sive measurements of voltages within RF cavities. Excluding production of characteristic X-rays, an energy spectrum of X-ray photons decreases monotonically as photon energies increase, and goes to zero at the energy of the electrons generating the X-rays. A measurement of the electron energy is therefore m ade by measuring the X-ray spectrum and locating its en dpoint energy. But locating the endpoint energy of an experimentally measured spectrum can be difficult because of statistical uncertainties in the data an d the presence of background. This paper presents a meth od of calculating the expected X-ray spectrum shape which can be fitted to data to help locate endpoints more rel iably. 2 X-RAY SPECTRA CALCULATIONS Ideally, calculation of an X-ray spectrum from an R F cavity would take into account the angular dependen ce of the X-ray photons relative to their generating elec trons, but because it adds great complexity to the calcula tion, and because anyway it is often not clear what the distribution of angles of the electrons themselves are, the present calculation is restricted to integrated-ove r-angle spectra. By considering the material in which an e lectron slows down and stops as a series of slices of thick ness dx, the integrated-over-angle X-ray spectrum as a funct ion of photon energy k for a fixed electron energy E can b e written as dY/dk(E,k) = (NA/A) ∫ dσ/dk(E’(x),k) dx wheredY/dk is the number of X-ray photons per unit energ y interval per electron, NA is Avogadro’s number, Z and A are the atomic weight and number of the material, d σ/dk is the integrated-over-angle bremsstrahlung cross-s ection, E'(x) is the electron energy after the electron has travelled a distance x (g/cm²) in the material, and the integ ral extends from 0 to xk where xk is the thickness at which the electron energy has reduced from E to k. The bremsstrahlung cross-section d σ/dk has been tabulated by Pratt et al. in [1], and the tabulated numbers may be represented by ( β²/Z²) k dσ/dk = a (1 – b(k/E)) where a ≈ 10 millibarns (10–27 cm²), b ≈ 0.5, and β is the velocity of the electron as a fraction of the velocity of light . The electron stopping power [2] in the material may be written dE/dx = cEd, whereupon E '(x) = (E(1–d) – (1–d)cx)(1/(1–d)). Since in an RF cavity the voltages are oscillating sinusoidally, the X-ray spectrum above must be inte grated over a sinusoidally varying electron energy, giving dY’/dk(E0,k) = (2/ π) ∫ dY/dk(E0sinθ,k) dθ where the integral extends from sin–1(k/E0) to π/2, and E0 is the peak value of the oscillating voltage. Fig. 1 compares an X-ray spectrum calculated as described above for a peak voltage of 90 kV between copper electrodes and the very simple, convenient b ut inevitably approximate X-ray spectrum of Kramers [3 ] dY/dk = ((2 × 5×10–4 Z) / 511) (E – k) / k (photons per keV). It can be seen that while the two spectra ar e similar at low energies, they increasingly diverge, by up t o an order of magnitude, as the photon energy increases. 1.E-081.E-071.E-061.E-051.E-041.E-03 0 20 40 60 80 100 X-ray photon energy (keV)X-ray photons per keV per electronKramers Present calculationX-ray spectrum from copper Figure 1 Comparison of X-ray spectra calculations 3 COMPARISON WITH MEASURED X-RAY SPECTRA Comparison of the above calculations has been made with X-ray spectra measured from a 202.5 MHz 4-rod RFQ [4,5] built by the Institut für Angewandte Phys ik at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe - Universität in Frankfu rt as part of a collaboration between the university and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL). A preliminar y version of the above calculations has already been used in [6]. The design peak rod-to-rod voltage in the RFQ is 90 kV for an input power of 200 kW. The X-ray spectrum from the RFQ was measured using a 20% EG&G/Ortec GMX high purity germanium (HPGe) photon spectrometer with a Schlumberger Ener tec PSC 761R preamplifier and a Canberra 2020 spectrosc opy pulse shaping amplifier, the latter being connected to an EG&G/Ortec TRUMP-8K-32 pulse height analysis (PHA) card TRUMP in a PC. A 1.6 mm diameter hole was drilled in the 5 mm lead shield completely surround ing the RFQ to allow X-ray photons to fall on the detector. The calibration of the system below ~100 keV was establ ished using the 26.3 and 59.5 keV lines from a small 241Am radioisotope source. The RFQ was driven at 50 pps with RF pulse lengths of 300–400 µs. The X-ray photon c ount rate in the detector was ~3 counts per 300–400 µs p ulse. Fig. 2 shows the X-ray spectrum from the RFQ at a power of 150 kW measured over 30 minutes. The HPGe detector was not shielded, nor was the PHA card gat ed around the RF pulse, so a background run with the s mall hole through the lead shield closed was taken and subtracted from the data measured with the hole ope n. To compare with these data, an X-ray spectrum shape was calculated as described above. The RFQ rods ar e copper, so Z = 29 and A = 63.5. The parameters a a nd b were taken to be 9 mb and 0.5 respectively. The parameters c and d were taken to be 5.85×104 (in units consistent with E being in keV) and –0.664 respecti vely, which when used in dE/dx = cEd represent the electron stopping power in copper to within 8% everywhere between 10 and 200 keV. To account for X-ray absorption in the 4 mm thick RFQ vacuum vessel, the spectrum was then multiplied by exp(–( µ/ρ(k)) x) where µ/ρ is the mass attenuation coefficient (cm²/g) for ph oton absorption for stainless steel (essentially iron) o btained from [7]. To account for the finite resolution of the HPGe detector, a gaussian of 3 keV FWHM was folded into the spectrum. To account for the small differences amo ngst the four pairs of inter-rod voltages, four quarter- strength spectra were summed with peak voltages f12Vnom, f14Vnom, f32Vnom and f34Vnom, where fij is the factor by which the voltage between rods i and j averaged along the len gth of the rods is different from the nominal voltage Vnom; values of f14, f14, f32 and f34 were 1.00, 1.07, 0.93 and 1.00 respectively. The resultant spectrum shape was the n fittedto the data, allowing the nominal peak voltage or e ndpoint energy to float. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that t he fit is reasonably good, and a value of 69.2±0.5 keV was obtained for Vnom. Figure 2 Comparison of measured and calculated X-r ay spectra It is evident from Fig. 2 that there are small discrepancies between the shapes of the measured an d calculated spectra. While these discrepancies may be reduced when the spectrum is re-measured with a gat ed PHA card, or when the RFQ is fully conditioned, it is more likely that the discrepancies are simply due t o approximations made in the calculations. Neverthel ess, by fitting spectrum shapes calculated as described above to measured spectra, is evident that peak voltages or endpoint energies may be extracted to within an uncertainty of ~1 keV. REFERENCES [1] R H Pratt et al., Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 20 (1977) 175 [2] Studies in Penetration of Charged Particles in M atter, National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council, Washington, DC, Nuclear Science Series Report no. 39, NAS-NRC 1133 (1964) [3] H W Koch and J W Motz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 31 (1959) 920 [4] H Vormann et al., “A New High Duty Factor RFQ Injector for ISIS”, EPAC 98, page 782 [5] A P Letchford and A Schempp, “A Comparison of 4-Rod and 4-Vane RFQ Fields”, EPAC 98, page 1204 [6] A P Letchford et al., “First Results from the ISIS RFQ Test Stand”, paper THP4A05, EPAC 2000 [7] J H Hubbell, Photon Cross Sections, Attenuation Coefficients and Energy Absorption Coefficients From 10 keV to 100 GeV, NSRDS-NBS 29 (1969)010002000300040005000 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 X-ray photon energy (keV)X-ray spectrum (counts per channel)150 kW, RFQ copper rods

The "W" Particle and the Weak Force Mechanism John A. Gowan August 2000 http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/jag8 The "W" particle is the "black box" of the weak force. The W "mediates" transformations of identity among the quarks and leptons, including their creation and destruction as singlets, that is, when they are not paired with antimatter partners. The W is very massive - about 90 times heavier than a proton. Because the large mass-energy of the W must be borrowed within the Heisenberg time limit for virtual particles, decays mediated by the W are both very short range and very slow - particles have to wait a long time for such a large amount of energy to become available as a quantum fluctuation within the bounds of the Heisenberg "virtual interval". The decays of the weak force are slow only in relation to other nuclear processes; typically the lifetimes of particles undergoing weak reactions is around 10-10 seconds (one 10 billionth of a second, or a tenth of a nanosecond), but this may nevertheless be ten billion times longer than typical strong force nuclear reactions. Because the W mediates so many different kinds of reactions, involving the decays of baryons, mesons, and leptons, with the production of so many different products, including neutrinos, photons, mesons, leptons, and baryons, one has to wonder what sort of transformation mechanism is operating inside the "black box" that is the W. In this paper I propose a very simple mechanism to explain the manifold transformations and products of the W. I begin by making an assumption about the nature of the W itself, a speculation concerning the origin of its great mass. This mass cannot be derived from quarks, the source of mass in ordinary particles. I suggest that the W and the other weak force “Intermediate Vector Bosons” (IVBs) (the Z and the X) are "metric" particles, composed simply of a very dense spacetime metric derived from the very early, energy dense Universe - much like the multidimensional, massive particles of "string" theory. The IVBs may in fact be unrecognized examples of "strings". The huge mass of these particles is due to the binding energy needed to compress, convolute, and maintain the metric of spacetime in these particular forms. A metric particle, mediator, or catalyst functions by engulfing the parent particle and combining it with one or more suitable particle- antiparticle pairs, these latter drawn from the infinitely varied resources of the virtual particle "sea", the quantum fluctuations of the vacuum. (The vacuum will be polarized by the presence of the parent particle, enabling the production of suitable particle-antiparticle pairs.) The W works its transformations simply by virtue of its dense (and perhaps convoluted) metric. The dense metric brings particles so close together that they can react with each other in ways which are impossible when they are separated by the distances of ordinary spacetime. In particular, particles can "feel satisfied" that certain conservation parameters will be observed, such as charge, spin, momentum, etc., due to their intimate proximity within the embracing scaffolding of the dense metric. Particles can safely exchange charges, swap places, trade identities, and annihilate one another, all within the close confines of the W because the metric structure of this particle produces a surrogate coupling between them that guarantees all their conservation requirements. The W acts simply as a metric catalyst while the virtual quantum "sea" provides the diversity of reactants and products. Below I list the slow or "weak" reactions as recorded in the “Stable Particle Table” of the 65th CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. A typical way of writing a weak reaction might be as follows, illustrating the weak decay of a negative pion, producing a muon and antimuon neutrino: ud-(W-) --- νµ + µ- I could write this reaction as: ud-( )W- --- νµ + µ- suggesting there are virtual reactants in the empty parenthesis which actually make the reaction happen. For example: ud-(µ+ x µ-)W- --- νµ + µ- Here I show the W coupling a muon-antimuon particle pair (drawn from the virtual quantum “sea”) with the negative pion to produce the actual reaction and its products. In this example the electric charges of the antimuon and pion cancel each other, releasing the antimuon's neutrino. The electric charge of the pion is conserved by the antimuon's partner, and the pion's u and d quarks can undergo a matter-antimatter annihilation, now possible because their electric charge has been transferred to the muon and their momentum has been coupled to the product particles by the metric scaffold of the W. All the reactions and their products listed below (essentially all the common weak force decays) can be produced by placing a suitably chosen particle-antiparticle pair (sometimes two) in the square brackets between the reacting particle and the W. Since adding a particle- antiparticle pair (or two) to a reaction is like adding zero to a mathematics equation, it is no surprise that it works in every case. Still, I do not think this result is trivial. At least it gives us a plausible, specific mechanism rather than the "black box" we have now. In addition, notice that in the case of baryon decay a particular meson is always necessary to both annihilate and supply a specific quark flavor in the baryon being transformed. The antiparticle of this reacting meson always appears among the product particles, suggesting that the proposed mechanism is in fact the actual pathway. From this observation we deduce the two-stage “beta” decay of the neutron, which helps explain the enormous lifetime of this particle. This observation does not apply to the decay pathways of the mesons themselves, as in those cases we are always dealing with particle- antiparticle pairs which can eventually annihilate each other regardless of differences in their quark’s flavors. In reading the reactions below, notice that typically the first member of the particle-antiparticle pair reacts with the “parent” particle outside the brackets, while the second member of the pair usually goes straight to the product unaffected. A few reactions have three or four components and apparently two steps, but none are particularly complicated. Lepton Decays (µ = muon, τ = tau, ν = neutrino, γ = photon) (antiparticles underlined; lifetimes in seconds; mass in MeV) 1) muon µ− µ+ mass 105.7 lifetime 2.2x10-6 principle decay products: a) electron, electron and muon neutrinos (98.6%): µ-[e+ x e-]W - --- νµ + νe + e- b) electron, electron and muon neutrinos, plus a photon (1.4%): µ-[e+ x e-]W - --- νµ + νe + e- + γ 2) tau τ- τ+ mass 1784.2 lifetime 4.6x10-13 principle decay products: a) muon, muon and tau neutrinos (18.5%): τ−[µ+ x µ-]W - --- ντ + νµ + µ- b) electron, electron and tau neutrinos (16.2%): τ-[e+ x e-]W - --- ντ + νe + e- c) hadron-, neutrals (37%) similar to: τ-[ud+ x ud-]W - --- ντ + ud- d) 3 hadrons+-, neutrals (28.4%) similar to: τ-[(ud+ x ud-)( ud+ x ud-)]W - --- ντ + ud- + (u d+ x ud-) Meson Decays (Quark flavors and electric charges: u, c, t = +2/3; d, s, b = -1/3; charges reversed in antiparticles) 1) pion u d+ ud- mass 139.6 lifetime 2.6x10-8 principle decay products: a) muon neutrino, antimuon (100%): ud+[µ− x µ+]W + --- νµ + µ+ b) antimuon neutrino, muon (100%): ud-[µ+ x µ-]W - --- νµ + µ- 2) Kaon u s+ us- mass 493.7 lifetime 1.2x10-8 principle decay products: a) antimuon neutrino, muon (63.5%): us-[µ+ x µ-]W - --- νµ + µ- b) neutral pion, positive pion (21.2%): us+[ud- x ud+]W + --- u u + ud+ c) 2 positive pions, 1 negative pion (5.6%): us+[ud- x ud+ x dd]W + --- u d+ + ud- + ud+ d) 1 positive pion, 2 neutral pions (1.7%): us+[ud- x ud+ x uu]W + --- u u + ud+ + uu e) muon antineutrino, muon, neutral pion (3.2%): us−[µ+ x µ- x uu]W - --- νµ + µ− + uu f) electron antineutrino, electron, neutral pion (4.8%): us-[e+ x e- x uu]W - --- νe + e- + uu 3a) neutral kaons ds sd mass 497.7 lifetime "Short": 0.9x10-10 "Long": 5x10-8 ("Long" is a superposition of ds and d s) principle decay modes ds or sd ("Short"): a) positive pion, negative pion (68.6%): ds[ud+ x ud-]W --- u d+ + ud- b) 2 neutral pions (31.4%): ds[dd x dd]W --- d d + dd3b) principle decay modes ds/sd ("Long"): a) 3 neutral pions (21.5%): ds/ds[dd x dd x dd]W --- dd + dd + dd b) 2 charged, 1 neutral pion (12.4%): ds/ds[(ud+ x ud-) x dd]W --- u d+ + ud- + dd c) charged pion, antimuon neutrino, muon (27.1%): ds/ds[ud+ x ud-(µ+ x µ)]W - --- u d+ + (νµ +µ-) d) charged pion, antielectron neutrino, electron (38.7%): ds/ds[(ud+ x ud-)(e+ x e-)]W - --- u d+ + (νe + e-) Baryon Decays 1) neutron udd (neutral) mass 939.6 lifetime 9.25x102 principle decay products (“beta” decay): a) proton plus electron plus electron antineutrino (100%): udd[du+ x du-(e+ x e-)]W - --- duu+ + (νe + e-) 2) lambda dsu (neutral) mass 1115.6 lifetime 2.6x10-10 principle decay products: a) proton plus negative pion (64.2%): dsu[du+ x du-]W - --- duu+ + ud- b) neutron plus neutral pion (35.8%): dsu[dd x d d]W --- ddu x d d 3) Sigma uus+ mass 1189.4 lifetime 0.8x10-10 principle decay products: a) proton + neutral pion (51.6%): uus+[dd x dd]W + --- uud+ + dd b) neutron + positive pion (48.4%): uus+[ud- x ud+ x dd]W + --- ddu + u d+ 4) Sigma dds- mass 1197 lifetime 1.5x10-10 principle decay products: a) neutron + negative pion (100%): dds-[ud+ x ud-]W - --- ddu + ud-5) Xi ssu (neutral) mass 1315 lifetime 2.9x10-10 principle decay products: a) lambda plus neutral pion (100%): ssu[dd x d d]W --- dsu + d d 6) Xi ssd- mass 1321.3 lifetime 1.6x10-10 principle decay products: a) lambda plus negative pion (100%): ssd-[ud+ x ud-]W - --- dsu + ud- 7) Omega sss- mass 1672.5 lifetime 0.8x10-10 principle decay products: a) lambda plus negative kaon (68.6%): sss-[su+ x su- x dd]W - --- dsu + s u- b) xi (neutral) plus negative pion (23.4%): sss-[ud+ x ud-]W - --- ssu + ud- c) Xi- plus neutral pion (8%): sss-[dd x dd]W - --- ssd- + dd Proton and Leptoquark Decays 1) proton decay uud+ (hypothetical) mediated by both X and W principal decay products (similar to tau+ decay products): a) hadron+, neutrals including leptoquark neutrino: X[uud+(ud- x ud+)]W + --- vlq + u d+ b) 3 hadrons+ -, neutrals including leptoquark neutrino: X[uud+(ud- x ud+)( ud- x ud+)]W + --- vlq + ud+ + (ud- + ud+) 2) leptoquark decay lq (+ -, neutral) (hypothetical - during Big Bang or Creation Event only; asymmetries in this decay are the source of the material Universe) Principle decay products (from the asymmetric decay of an electrically neutral leptoquark-antileptoquark pair): a) heavy neutral baryon, leptoquark neutrino, heavy neutral mesons similar to: X[lq x lq(ττ x ττ)]W --- νlq + bbt + ( ττ + ττ)X[lq x lq(ττ x ττ)]W --- νlq + bbt + ( ττ + ττ) b) same, more mesons, charged and neutral (In a leptoquark, the quarks are compressed by the X to leptonic size, vanishing the color charge (asymptotic freedom). An electrically neutral leptoquark should decay like a very heavy neutral lepton, via the W. In the pair shown, the quarks of the unreacted leptoquark expand under their mutual repulsion to form the heavy baryon. Once these quarks have expanded, the baryon cannot undergo leptonic decay due to the explicit presence of the color charge). References: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 65th edition, 1984-5. CRC Press, Inc. Links: Symmetry Principles of the Unified Field Theory Identity Charge and the Weak Force Table of Particles The System of Matter The Hourglass Diagrams The Formation of Matter and the Origin of Information Homepage Mirror Site: http://members.home.net/m.guest/Spacetime

arXiv:physics/0008026v1 [physics.acc-ph] 9 Aug 2000Longitudinal Laser Shaping in Laser Wakefield Accelerators Anatoly Spitkovsky(1)and Pisin Chen(2) (1)Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley , CA 94720 (2)Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 (December 2, 2013) We study the energetics of wake excitation during the laser- plasma interaction in application to laser wakefield accelerators. We find that both the wake ampli tude and the accelerating efficiency (transformer ratio) can be maximized by properly shaping th e longitudinal profile of the driving laser pulse. The corresponding family of laser pulse shapes is der ived in the nonlinear regime of laser- plasma interaction. Such shapes provide theoretical upper limit on the magnitude of the wakefield and efficiency by allowing for uniform photon deceleration in side the laser pulse. We also construct realistic optimal pulse shapes that can be produced in finite -bandwidth laser systems. 52.75.Di, 52.40.Nk, 41.75.Lx, 52.40.Mj Current plasma accelerators can be broadly subdivided into two classes – the laser driven scheme [1], and the electron beam driven scheme [2]. While the accelerat- ing plasma waves excited in these two schemes are very similar, the physics of wakefield excitation is quite differ- ent between them. In the beam-driven Plasma Wakefield Accelerator (PWFA) the electron beam loses energy to the plasma through interaction with the induced elec- trostatic field, while in the laser-driven Laser Wakefield Accelerator (LWFA) energy loss occurs via photon red- shift or deceleration [3]. This process is due to the pres- ence of wake-induced stationary modulations in the re- fractive index of the plasma as seen in the laser comoving frame [4]. With the recent advances in laser technology, the creation of ultrashort pulses with virtually arbitrary temporal profiles is now possible by using amplitude and phase pulse shapers [5]. Since perturbations to the refrac- tive index of the plasma depend on pulse shape, different laser shapes will vary in their coupling to the plasma. A natural question therefore arises: what laser shape is the “optimal” for laser-plasma accelerators? The number of parameters involved in selecting a par- ticular pulse shape can be overwhelming. One can char- acterize a shape by the value of its total energy, length, maximum laser field, amplitude of plasma wake, etc., in addition to an infinite-dimensional space of actual shape functions. Luckily, not all of these parameters are inde- pendent or even well-defined. In this Letter we argue that the only two meaningful parameters that describe a laser shape from the stand point of wake excitation are the total pulse energy and its depletion length. Using these parameters different laser shapes can be consistently clas- sified and cross-compared while desired properties such as wake amplitude or efficiency can be optimized. Let us consider a homogeneous unmagnetized plasma which is charge neutral, at rest, and has initial density npin the absence of electromagnetic wave. Laser propa- gates along the zaxis with initial frequency ω0≫ωp≡/radicalbig 4πe2np/me. In the laser comoving frame, the plasmaresponse can be written in terms of the independent di- mensionless variables ζ=kp(z−vgt) and τ=kpct, where kpis the plasma wavenumber, and vg≈ −cis the laser group velocity (for convenience the laser is mov- ing in the negative zdirection). Introducing dimension- less normalized scalar and vector potentials φ(ζ) and a(ζ), the parallel and perpendicular electric fields are E/bardbl=−(mc2kp/e)∂φ/∂ζ andE⊥=−(mc/e)∂a/∂t = −(mc2kp/e)∂a/∂ζ . The wakefield generation equation can then be written as [6,7]: d2x dζ2=ne np−1 =1 2/parenleftBig1 +a2(ζ) x2−1/parenrightBig , (1) where neis the perturbed electron plasma density, x≡ 1 +φis the modified electrostatic potential, and a2(ζ) is the dimensionless laser intensity envelope averaged over fast oscillations. Prior to the arrival of the laser the normalized wakefield E ≡ eE/bardbl/mecωp=−dx/dζ is zero. A formal solution for the electric field out- side the laser can be written as the first integral of (1): [Eout(ζ)]2=−(x−1)2/x+/integraltext∞ −∞a2x′/x2dζ, which reaches a maximum value at x= 1: [Eout max]2=−/integraldisplay∞ −∞a2(ζ)/parenleftBig∂ ∂ζ1 x/parenrightBig dζ. (2) This expression can be understood in terms of the de- position of laser energy into plasma. Due to negligible scattering, the photon number in the laser is essentially constant, and the laser energy loss is predominantly in the form of frequency redshift, or photon deceleration [8,9]: ∂ω ∂z=−1 2ω2 p ωkp∂ ∂ζne γnp=−ω2 p 2ωkp/parenleftBig∂ ∂ζ1 x/parenrightBig . (3) The energy density in the wake from (2) can then be interpreted as the intensity-weighted integral of the pho- ton deceleration throughout the pulse. Let’s denote the wake-dependent part of the photon deceleration function 1asκ(ζ)≡x′/x2. It is closely related to the character- istic laser depletion length ld, or the distance in which the maximally decelerated laser slice redshifts down to ωpassuming a nonevolving wakefield. From (3), ld= [(ω0/ωp)2−1]/kpκmax, where κmaxis the maximum of κ(ζ) inside the laser. The value of the peak wakefield in (2) is bounded from above by the total laser energy and the maximum photon deceleration: [Eout max]2=/integraldisplay∞ −∞a2(ζ)κ(ζ)dζ≤κmax/integraldisplay∞ −∞a2(ζ)dζ.(4) One possible optimization problem can then be formu- lated as follows: given some fixed laser energy ε0(i.e., the integral of a2), and the desired depletion length (i.e., κmax=κ0), what laser shape would produce the largest possible wakefield? From (4) it is clear that such a shape should maintain a constant maximal photon deceleration throughout the pulse. If the laser is present for ζ >0, then in order to satisfy the boundary conditions the pho- ton deceleration should rise from 0 to value κ0at the very beginning of the pulse, e.g., like a step-function: κ(ζ) =κ0θ(ζ+). Here, ζ+≡ζ−0+in order to avoid ambiguities with the values of step-function at 0. The corresponding laser profile is then found from the wake equation (1): a2 l(ζ) =2κ0δ(ζ+) (1−κ0ζ)4+4κ2 0θ2(ζ+) (1−κ0ζ)5+1 (1−κ0ζ)2−1,(5) where ζ∈[0, ζf<1/κ0], and δ(ζ+) is a delta-function such that/integraltextζ>0 0δ(y+)dy= 1. A schematic drawing of the optimal laser intensity variation and its associated plasma wakefield are shown in Fig. 1. Generally, the shape consists of a δ-function at the front followed by a ramp in intensity which is cut off at ζf. In the linear regime, when a2≪1,κ0→0, the ramp reduces to a tri- angular shape found in [9,10]: a2= 2κ0(δ(ζ+) +ζ). We note that (5) describes a family of shapes, rather than a fixed shape. The actual profile of the optimal pulse depends on the deceleration parameter κ0set by the de- sired depletion length and the pulse length ζf, which is determined from the available total energy: ε0= 2κ0+ζf[κ2 0+ (1−κ0ζf)3] (1−κ0ζf)4. (6) Although the pulse length cannot exceed ζc≡1/κ0, the rise of a2towards the end of the pulse guarantees that any finite laser energy can be accommodated for ζf< ζc. The two terms in (6) represent the energy contained in theδ-function precursor and the main pulse. It is clear that for a fixed total energy there exists a maximum value ofκ0=ε0/2 which is achieved when ζf→0, i.e., all of the energy is concentrated in the δ-function. This shape, which is a particular case of the general optimal shape (5), excites the largest possible wakefield and hasthe smallest depletion length among all pulses of fixed energy. For circularly polarized pulses with cylindrical transverse crossection of radius r0and wavelength λ, the maximum achievable wake is then given by: Emax= 6.54Ewb/bracketleftBigU0 1J/bracketrightBig/bracketleftBigλ 1µm/bracketrightBig2/bracketleftBig10µm r0/bracketrightBig2/bracketleftBignp 1018cm−3/bracketrightBig1/2 (7) where U0is the total pulse energy (in Joules) and Ewb= 96[np/1018cm−3]GV/m is the nonrelativistic wavebreak- ing field. 0 2 4 6 8 10 ζ0246 FIG. 1. General shape of the nonlinear optimal laser inten- sity profile and its corresponding wakefield (arbitrary unit s). The method used for obtaining the optimal shape (5) is actually more general and can be used to determine laser shapes that generate other variations in the nonlin- ear index of refraction. Having a physical requirement for the refractive index η≡[1−(ωp/ω)2ne/γnp]1/2= [1−(ωp/ω)21/x]1/2, which for this case is the require- ment of uniformity of photon deceleration, provides a constraint on x(ζ), which can then be used to find the laser shape from the wake equation. Alas, such a “re- verse” solution is not always guaranteed to yield a physi- cal (i.e., positive) a2(ζ), so, in general, caution is advised. While the generation of large accelerating gradients is a prerequisite for a successful accelerating scheme, the ef - ficiency of acceleration should also be considered. For an accelerating scheme that involves transfer of energy from the driver beam to the accelerating beam, efficiency is measured in terms of the transformer ratio , or the ra- tio of the maximum rate of energy gain per particle of accelerating beam to the maximum rate of energy loss per particle of the driving beam. In the case of laser- plasma accelerators, where the driving and accelerating beams consist of particles of different species, the follow- ing kinematic definition is more useful: R≡|∂γa/∂z|max |∂γd/∂z|max, (8) where γdandγaare Lorentz factors for the driving and accelerating beams. In LWFA the particles in the trailing 2electron bunch are accelerated via electrostatic interac- tion with the wake, so |∂γa/∂z|max=|eEmax /bardbl|/mec2= kp|Eout max|. For the laser propagating in plasma γd≈ω/ω p, so|∂γd/∂z|is the photon frequency shift given by (3). The transformer ratio for LWFA is then: RLWFA=2ω ωp|∂x/∂ζ|out max |∂(1/x)/∂ζ|inmax∝ |E|out maxkpld.(9) It follows from this definition that the transformer ratio is not only a measure of local accelerating efficiency, but is also directly related to the maximum energy that can be transferred to the accelerating beam particle over the laser depletion length (assuming no evolution of the wake during propagation). As there is no absolute maximum of R, we can only look for a shape that maximizes Rsubject to constraints. For instance, among the pulses of fixed energy and deple- tion length Ris maximized by a pulse that produces the largest wakefield. But this is precisely the optimal shape found above. A more general proof involves considering all pulses irrespective of total energy that create a given value of wakefield. It can then be shown [11] that a pulse which has the largest depletion length among these must maintain a constant photon deceleration inside the pulse, which again points to the shape (5). From (9) the opti- mal transformer ratio is then: RLWFA=2ω ωp/radicalBigg 1 + (kpLp)2[1−κ0(kpLp)]3 [1−κ0(kpLp)]4,(10) where Lp=ζf/kpis the pulse length. In the linear regime optimal transformer ratios for both LWFA and PWFA schemes scale identically with the pulse/beam length: RLWFA→(2ω/ω p)/radicalbig 1 + (kpLpulse)2, RPWFA→/radicalbig 1 + (kpLbeam)2[12]. The LWFA scheme is intrinsically more efficient by a factor of 2 ω/ω p, which is needed for vi- ability of LWFA since lasers are typically “slower” drivers than electron beams. The advantage of using the optimal pulse shape is best seen in comparison with the unshaped (Gaussian) pulse. For a given Gaussian pulse (or any other non-optimal shape) one can always construct a corresponding opti- mally shaped pulse with the same laser energy such that the photon deceleration across the optimal pulse equals to the peak photon deceleration in the unshaped one (i.e., both pulses have equal depletion lengths). Unshaped pulses deplete first in the region where photon decelera- tion is the largest, whereas a laser with the optimal shape losesallits energy in a depletion length due to uniform photon deceleration, thus enhancing instantaneous en- ergy deposition and wakefield. For a numerical example, we consider the optimal and Gaussian pulses of total en- ergy 0 .5J, wavelength 1 µm and cylindrical radius 10 µm in a plasma with np= 1018cm−3. The transformer ra- tio, the maximum wakefield, the required pulse length,and the corresponding peak a0are shown in Fig. 2 as functions of depletion length. From Fig. 2 we see that the transformer ratio and the maximum wakefield are consistently larger for shaped pulses. In fact, the lines for optimal pulse wakefield and transformer ratio represent theoretical upper lim- its for all pulses of given energy. The Gaussian pulse achieves a maximum transformer ratio when its length (measured here as FWHM) equals 1 /2 of the relativis- tic plasma wavelength. The effects of shaping are espe- cially prominent for longer pulses, where Gaussian pulse yields almost no wake excitation due to plasma oscilla- tions inside the pulse that cause part of the laser photons to absorb energy from the wake. On the other hand, a shaped laser postpones plasma oscillation until the end of the pulse, and all photons decelerate uniformly. For very short pulses, the differences between the two shapes are minimal. This is due to the fact that very short Gaus- sian pulses of fixed energy asymptotically approach the delta-function limit of the short optimal shape. Transformer Ratio 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depletion length, cm0200400600800|∂γa /∂z| / |∂γd /∂z|Maximum wakefield 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depletion length, cm0123eE||max/mc2 kp Pulse length 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depletion length, cm0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2Pulse length, λpMaximum a0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depletion length, cm02468Max a0 FIG. 2. Comparison of the transformer ratio, maximum wakefield, pulse length, and maximum normalized vector po- tential in shaped (diamonds) and Gaussian (triangles) puls es of equal depletion lengths and constant pulse energy of 0 .5J. Although short pulses generally produce the largest wakefields, their efficiency is close to minimal possible, as the depletion length decreases faster than increase in the wake. Therefore, the choice of the appropriate pulse shape for LWFA stage will depend on specific experimen- tal conditions. If the laser-plasma interaction distance i s limited by instabilities, diffraction or dephasing, then in order to maximize the electron energy gain one should try to achieve the largest accelerating gradient, which can be accomplished with ultrashort pulses. If, how- 3ever, the interaction length is less constrained, such as the case for propagation in plasma channels [13], then using a finite-length shaped pulse will result in a greatly improved overall energy gain per stage. An added ben- efit of pulse shaping is the suppression of modulational instability that affects unshaped pulses that are longer than plasma wavelength. When all photons redshift, or “slow down”, at the same rate, different laser slices do not overrun each other, and the 1D laser self-modulation is suppressed. 02468 ζ00.511.52 02468 ζ00.511.52 02468 ζ00.511.52 FIG. 3. Laser intensity (shaded) and the associated photon deceleration ( −κ(ζ)) for pulses of the same total energy and characteristic depletion length in the order of decreasing α. As the optimal pulse shape is associated with a delta- function precursor, the feasibility of such a structure may be a concern. We note that the purpose of this precursor is to bring the photon deceleration from zero in the qui- escent plasma before the laser to a finite value κ0at the beginning of the main pulse. This can also be achieved with a more physical prepulse, whose shape can be found once a smooth function κ(ζ) is chosen. For our example we choose κ(ζ) =κ0[1 + tanh α(ζ−ζ0)]/2, where αis a steepness parameter and ζ0is an arbitrary offset. The corresponding laser shape is then: a2=κ0αsech2αζ1 χ4(ζ1)+κ2 0[1 + tanh αζ1]2 χ5(ζ1)+1 χ2(ζ1)−1, (11) where ζ1≡ζ−ζ0≤ζfandχ(ζ1)≡1 + (κ0/2α)ln1 2− κ0[ζ1+1 αln(cosh αζ1)]/2. As before, the pulse length ζf can be found from the available pulse energy. For a step- function photon deceleration ( α→ ∞) expression (11) asymptotes to equation (5). However, for finite values ofαthe delta-function precursor spreads out and can even disappear as shown in Fig. 3. The family of shapes given by (11) is better suited for the finite-bandwidth laser systems that have a lower limit on achievable fea- ture size. The values of the maximum wakefield for pulses in Fig. 3 are within few percent of the value for an equiv- alent delta-function optimal pulse because the bulk of the modified laser pulse still experiences constant maxi- mal photon deceleration. The wakefield further degradeswith longer rise times of κ(ζ). It is also possible to con- struct optimal shapes that propagate in a pre-existing plasma oscillation and act as wakefield amplifiers [11]. Such shapes also do not require delta-function precur- sors. Several issues should be addressed before the laser pulse shaping concept can be fully utilized. Even without the delta-function precursor, the finite laser bandwidth will necessarily smooth out sharp rises and falls of the optimal pulse shape. Although we do not anticipate ad- verse effects when the feature size is much smaller than the plasma wavelength, the 1D self-consistent laser evo- lution and stability of realistic optimal shapes are cur- rently under investigation. Another consideration is the influence of the laser-plasma interaction in the trans- verse dimension on the evolution of the pulse. Many of the laser-plasma instabilities are seeded by the wakefield- induced perturbations of the index of refraction. As we have demonstrated in this Letter, the nonlinear index of refraction can be effectively controlled through laser shaping, thus suggesting the method of delaying the on- set of these instabilities. Whether this approach increase s the growth rates of other instabilities, particularly in th e transverse dimension, remains to be investigated. We would like to thank J. Arons, A. Charman, T. Kat- souleas, W. B. Mori, and J. Wurtele for fruitful discus- sions and suggestions. [1] T. Tajima, J. M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267 (1979). [2] P. Chen, J. M. Dawson, R. Huff, T. Katsouleas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 693 (1985). [3] S. Wilks, J. M. Dawson, W. B. Mori, T. Katsouleas, M. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2600 (1989). [4] W. B. Mori, IEEE J. Quant. Elec. 33, 1942 (1997) [5] F. Verluise, V. Laude, Z. Cheng, et al., Optics Lett. 25, 575 (2000). [6] P. Sprangle, E. Esarey, J. Krall, and G. Joyce, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2200 (1992). [7] E. Esarey, P. Sprangle, J. Krall, A. Ting, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 24, 252 (1996). [8] E. Esarey, A. Ting, and P. Sprangle, Phys. Rev. A 42, 3526, (1990). [9] P. Chen, A. Spitkovsky, AIP Conf. Proc. 472, 321 (1999). [10] P. Chen, A. Spitkovsky, T. Katsouleas, W. B. Mori, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 410, 488 (1998). [11] A. Spitkovsky, P. Chen, AIP Conf. Proc. Advanced Ac- celerator Concepts 2000 , in press. [12] P. Chen, J. J. Su, J. M. Dawson, K. Bane, and P. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1252 (1986). [13] E. Esarey, P. Sprangle, J. Krall, A. Ting, G. Joyce, Phys . Fluids B 5, 2690 (1993). 4

arXiv:physics/0008027v1 [physics.acc-ph] 9 Aug 2000Laser Shaping and Optimization of the Laser-Plasma Interaction Anatoly Spitkovsky∗and Pisin Chen† ∗Department of Physics, University of California at Berkele y, Berkeley, CA 94720 †Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Abstract. The physics of energy transfer between the laser and the plas ma in laser wakefield accelerators is studied. We find that wake excitati on by arbitrary laser shapes can be parameterized using the total pulse energy and pulse d epletion length. A tech- nique for determining laser profiles that produce the requir ed plasma excitation is developed. We show that by properly shaping the longitudina l profile of the driving laser pulse, it is possible to maximize both the transformer ratio and the wake ampli- tude, achieving optimal laser-plasma coupling. The corres ponding family of laser pulse shapes is derived in the nonlinear regime of laser-plasma in teraction. Such shapes provide theoretical upper limit on the magnitude of the wake field and efficiency of the accelerating stage by allowing for uniform photon decel eration inside the laser pulse. We also construct realistic optimal pulse shapes tha t can be produced in finite- bandwidth laser systems and propose a two-pulse wake amplifi cation scheme using the optimal solution. INTRODUCTION Recent advances in laser technology allow one to create lase r pulses with virtually arbitrary temporal intensity profiles using amplitude and p hase shapers [1–3]. Such laser pulses with non-Gaussian axial intensity are now bein g considered for applica- tions as drivers in Laser Wakefield Accelerators (LWFA). Sha ped lasers provide the means of controlling the generation of plasma wake and thus o ffer the possibility of optimization of wake excitation and accelerating efficien cy. However, progress in finding “the optimal” shape has been hindered by the appare nt complexity of the problem. Not only is the parameter space of possible shap e functions huge, but also the generated wakefield is a nonlinear function of la ser intensity, requir- ing numerical solution of differential equations in a variat ional calculation. As a result, several groups turned to trial and error methods suc h as genetic algorithms for optimization [2,3]. Still, even these methods require c onsistent classification of laser shapes so that different pulses can be meaningfully c ross-compared while desired properties such as wake amplitude or efficiency are op timized. In this paper we reanalyze the process of wake generation and argue that th e only two physicalparameters that describe a laser shape from the stand point o f wake excitation are the total pulse energy and its depletion length. Using these parameters we find the analytic expression for the family of optimal laser shapes that maxim ize both the wakefield andthe accelerating efficiency. We also develop a method for dete rmining the shape of a laser that produces a required value of wakefiel dwithout explicitly solving the wake equation. This opens the way for obtaining l aser shapes that satisfy other optimization criteria specific to given exper imental conditions. ENERGY TRANSFER IN LWFA Wakefield accelerators such as the laser-driven LWFA [4] or e lectron beam driven Plasma Wakefield Accelerator (PWFA) [5] can be viewed as two- step energy trans- fer systems: in the first step the driver deposits energy into wake excitation of the plasma, and in the second step the energy is taken from the wak e by the accel- erating beam. While the second step is the same for both accel erating schemes, the physics of driver energy deposition is quite different be tween them. In PWFA the electron beam loses energy to the plasma through interac tion with the in- duced electrostatic field, while in the LWFA laser energy los s occurs via photon red-shift or deceleration [6]. This process can be understo od as follows. Podero- motive force of the laser modifies both the density neand the Lorentz factor γ of the plasma electrons. This produces modulations in the no nlinear index of the refractionη≡[1−(ωp/ω)2ne/γnp]1/2, whereωp≡/radicalBig 4πe2np/meis the unper- turbed plasma frequency, and ωis the frequency of the laser. The wake-induced modulations of the refractive index appear stationary in th e reference frame co- moving with the laser and cause laser photons to red- or blue- shift depending on the sign of refractive index gradient [7]. Due to negligible scattering in the set- ting of laser accelerators, the photon number in the laser is essentially constant, and the energy deposition into the plasma is therefore deter mined by the pho- ton deceleration. To address this quantitatively we consid er a laser propagating along thezaxis with initial frequency ω0≫ωp.In the laser comoving frame, the plasma response can be written in terms of the independent di mensionless variables ζ=kp(z−vgt) andτ=kpct, wherekpis the plasma wavenumber, and vg≈ −c is the laser group velocity (for convenience, the laser is mo ving in the negative z direction). Introducing dimensionless normalized scalar and vector potentials φ(ζ) anda(ζ), the parallel and perpendicular electric fields are E/bardbl=−(mc2kp/e)∂φ/∂ζ andE⊥=−(mc/e)∂a/∂t =−(mc2kp/e)∂a/∂ζ . The wakefield generation equation can then be written as [8,9]: d2x dζ2=ne np−1 =1 2/parenleftBig1 +a2(ζ) x2−1/parenrightBig , (1) wherex≡1+φis the modified electrostatic potential, and a2(ζ) is the dimensionless laser intensity envelope averaged over fast oscillations. Prior to the arrival of thelaser the normalized wakefield E ≡eE/bardbl/mcω p=−dx/dζ is zero. A formal solution for the electric field outside the laser can be written as the fi rst integral of (1): [Eout(ζ)]2=−(x−1)2/x+/integraltext∞ −∞a2x′/x2dζ, which reaches a maximum value at x= 1: [Eout max]2=−/integraldisplay∞ −∞a2(ζ)/parenleftBig∂ ∂ζ1 x/parenrightBig dζ. (2) This expression can be understood in terms of the deposition of laser energy into plasma. For this we use the formula for local frequency shift of laser photons obtained from the analysis of laser evolution equation [10, 11]: ∂ω ∂z=−1 2ω2 p ωkp∂ ∂ζne γnp=−ω2 p 2ωkp/parenleftBig∂ ∂ζ1 x/parenrightBig . (3) The energy density in the wake from (2) can then be interprete d as the intensity- weighted integral of the photon deceleration throughout th e pulse. Let’s denote the wake-dependent part of the photon deceleration functio n asκ(ζ)≡x′/x2. The value of the peak wakefield in (2) is then bounded from above by the total laser energy (the integral of a2) and the maximum photon deceleration κmax: [Eout max]2=/integraldisplay∞ −∞a2(ζ)κ(ζ)dζ≤κmax/integraldisplay∞ −∞a2(ζ)dζ, (4) whereκmaxis the maximum of κ(ζ) inside the laser. Maximum photon decelera- tionκmaxactually has a simple physical interpretation. It is closel y related to the characteristic laser depletion length ld, or the distance in which the maximally de- celerated laser slice red-shifts down to ωp(assuming no evolution of the wakefield). From (3) this characteristic depletion length is: ld= [(ω0/ωp)2−1]/kpκmax. (5) The peak wakefield outside the laser then scales with depleti on lengthldand di- mensionless pulse energy ε0≡/integraltext∞ −∞a2(ζ)dζas:Eout max≤/radicalBig [(ω0/ωp)2−1]ε0/kpld.The range of achievable wakefields is therefore set by the total p ulse energy and its depletion length. For pulses of fixed energy and depletion le ngth the actual value of the wakefield within this range will depend only on particu lar laser shape, and can be optimized by varying the shape subject to constraints . WAKEFIELD OPTIMIZATION One possible optimization problem can be formulated as foll ows: given some fixed laser energy ε0and the desired depletion length ( κmax=κ0), what laser shape would produce the largest possible wakefield? Accordi ng to (4) this amounts to finding a shape that maintains the largest κ(ζ) for the duration of the pulse. Since the maximum κ(ζ) is fixed by the depletion length, such a shape should have0 2 4 6 8 10 ζ0246 FIGURE 1. General shape of the nonlinear optimal laser intensity profi le and its corresponding wakefield (arbitrary units) a constant photon deceleration throughout the pulse, κ(ζ) =κ0. If the laser is present for ζ >0, then in order to satisfy the boundary condition of quiesce nt plasma before the laser, the photon deceleration should ris e from 0 to value κ0at the very beginning of the pulse, e.g., like a step-function: κ(ζ) =κ0θ(ζ+). Here, ζ+≡ζ−0+in order to avoid ambiguities with the values of step-functi on at 0. The corresponding laser profile is then found from the wake eq uation (1): a2 l(ζ) =2κ0δ(ζ+) (1−κ0ζ)4+4κ2 0θ2(ζ+) (1−κ0ζ)5+1 (1−κ0ζ)2−1, (6) whereζ∈[0,ζf<1/κ0], andδ(ζ+) is a delta-function such that/integraltextζ>0 0δ(y+)dy= 1. A schematic drawing of the optimal laser intensity variatio n and its associated plasma wakefield are shown in Fig. 1. Generally, the shape con sists of aδ-function at the front followed by a ramp in intensity which is cut off at ζf. In the linear regime, when a2≪1,κ0→0, the ramp reduces to a triangular shape found in [11,12]: a2= 2κ0(δ(ζ+) +ζ). We note that (6) describes a family of shapes, rather than a fixed shape. The actual profile of the optimal pul se depends on the deceleration parameter κ0set by the desired depletion length and the pulse length ζf, which is determined from the available total energy: ε0= 2κ0+ζf[κ2 0+ (1−κ0ζf)3] (1−κ0ζf)4. (7) Although the pulse length cannot exceed ζc≡1/κ0, the rise of a2towards the end of the pulse guarantees that any finite laser energy can be accommodated for ζf< ζc. The two terms in (7) represent the energy contained in the δ-function precursor and the main pulse. It is clear that for a fixed total energy there exists a maximum value of κ0=ε0/2 which is achieved when ζf→0, i.e., all of the energy is concentrated in the δ-function. This shape, which is a particular case of the general optimal shape (6), excites the largest possible wakefield and has thesmallest depletion length among all pulses of fixed energy. F or circularly polarized pulses with cylindrical transverse crossection of radius r0and wavelength λ, the maximum achievable wake is then given by: Emax= 6.54Ewb/bracketleftBigU0 1J/bracketrightBig/bracketleftBigλ 1µm/bracketrightBig2/bracketleftBig10µm r0/bracketrightBig2/bracketleftBignp 1018cm−3/bracketrightBig1/2(8) whereU0is the total pulse energy (in Joules) and Ewb= 96[np/1018cm−3]GV/m is the nonrelativistic wavebreaking field. EFFICIENCY OPTIMIZATION While generation of large accelerating gradients is a prere quisite for a successful accelerating scheme, the efficiency of acceleration should a lso be considered. For an accelerating scheme that involves transfer of energy fro m the driver beam to the accelerating beam, efficiency is measured in terms of the transformer ratio , or the ratio of the maximum rate of energy gain per particle of ac celerating beam to the maximum rate of energy loss per particle of the driving beam. In the case of laser-plasma accelerators, where the driving and accele rating beams consist of particles of different species, the following kinematic defi nition is more useful: R≡|∂γa/∂z|max |∂γd/∂z|max, (9) whereγdandγaare Lorentz factors for the driving and accelerating beams. In LWFA the particles in the trailing electron bunch are accele rated via electrostatic interaction with the wake, so |∂γa/∂z|max=|eEmax /bardbl|/mec2=kp|Eout max|. For the laser propagating in plasma γd≈ω/ω p, so|∂γd/∂z|is the photon frequency shift given by (3). The transformer ratio for LWFA is then: RLWFA=2ω ωp|∂x/∂ζ|out max |∂(1/x)/∂ζ|inmax∝ |E|out maxkpld. (10) Defined this way the transformer ratio can have several inter pretations. On the one hand, it is a measure of local accelerating efficiency, or t he amount of increase inγof the accelerating electron per unit loss of γof the laser. On the other hand, transformer ratio is proportional to the maximum energy tha t can be transferred to the accelerating beam particle over the laser depletion l ength (assuming no evolution of the wake during propagation). Therefore, an effi cient accelerating scheme should attempt to maximize the transformer ratio. There are several ways to find the laser shape that maximizes R. Among the pulses of fixed energy and depletion length, Ris maximized by a pulse that produces the largest wakefield as can be seen from (10). The optimal sha pe found in Eq. (6) satisfies this requirement. Alternatively, one can relax th e energy constraint andinstead look for a laser profile that has the largest depletio n length among all the shapes that produce a given maximum wakefield behind the lase r. Although this reasoning leads to the same resulting shape, we include the p roof for completeness as it demonstrates a useful technique for determining laser shapes that satisfy constraints on the values of the wakefield. In order to find the shape that maximizes the transformer rati o, we vary the photon deceleration function κ(ζ) inside the laser. We require that κ(ζ) be positive definite, i.e., laser photons only loseenergy to the plasma and do not reabsorb energy from the wake. The advantage of varying κ(ζ) rather than a2(ζ) directly is that one can immediately write down the solution for the wa kefield potential x(ζ) in terms of the photon energy deposition function ψ(ζ)≡/integraltextζ −∞κ(ζ1)dζ1, i.e., x(ζ) = 1/(1−ψ(ζ)). The corresponding laser shape is then determined from th e wakefield equation (1): a2(ζ) = (2x′′(ζ) + 1)x(ζ)2−1 =2ψ′′(ζ) [1−ψ(ζ)]4+4ψ′(ζ)2 [1−ψ(ζ)]5+1 [1−ψ(ζ)]2−1.(11) Note that not all functions ψ(ζ) should produce physical, i.e., positive a2(ζ), and the validity of a given κ(ζ) should be checked through (11). By considering photon energy deposition in the pulse all possible laser sha pes that produce a given wakefield can be mapped onto a bounded space of monotoni cally increasing functionsψ(ζ), whose end values on the interval [0 ,ζf] and derivatives at ζfare constrained by the required maximum value of the wakefield. F rom the first integral of the wakefield equation we can relate the modified potential xf≡x(ζf) and the electric field x′ f≡x′(ζf) evaluated at the end of the pulse: (Eout max)2=(xf−1)2 xf+ (x′ f)2=ψ(ζf)2 (1−ψ(ζf))+ψ′(ζf)2 (1−ψ(ζf))4. (12) Monotonicity of ψ(ζ) follows from the requirement κ(ζ)≥0, and the bounds onψ(ζ) are 0 =ψ(0)≤ψ(ζ)≤ψmax<1. A few sample solutions for ψ(ζ) and corresponding photon deceleration and laser shapes are plo tted in Fig. 2. The func- tionψ(ζ) that results in the largest transformer ratio should posse ss the smallest maximal slope in the interval [0 ,ζf] – this will maximize the depletion length for a fixed Eout max. Such curve is unique and is represented by curve 2 in figure 2. It is a straight line with slope ψ′(ζf) =ψ(ζf)crit/ζf, where the value of ψ(ζf)critis determined from substituting ψ′(ζf) into eq. (12). Let’s show that this line has the smallest maximum slope. Since ψ′(ζf) is a decreasing function of ψ(ζf) for a fixed Eout max(eq. (12)), all curves ψ(ζ) withψ(ζf)<ψ(ζf)crit(such as curve 1 in figure 2) will automatically have larger slope at ζf:ψ′(ζ)>ψ(ζf)crit/ζf. On the other hand, the curves with ψ(ζf)>ψ(ζf)crit(such as curves 3 and 4) should have a slope larger thanψ(ζf)critsomewhere between 0 and ζfin order to be larger than ψ(ζf)critat ζf. We therefore prove that the function ψ(ζ) =κ0ζ, whereκ0≡ψ(ζf)crit/ζf, is an integrated photon deceleration profile that maximizes the t ransformer ratio.0 π/2 π 3π/2 2π ζ00.20.40.6ψ(ζ)ψmaxa) 12 34 0 π/2 π 3π/2 2π ζ00.10.20.30.4κ(ζ)b) 143 2 0 π/2 π 3π/2 2π ζ051015 a2(ζ)c) 1234 FIGURE 2. a) Sample photon energy deposition ψ(ζ) for pulses of length not exceeding ζf= 2π; b) corresponding photon deceleration functions; c) result ing laser intensity profiles. All shapes produce the same maximum wakefield. The photon deceleration function associated with this ψ(ζ) is a constant κ(ζ) = κ0and the resulting laser shape is the same as given by (6). The o ptimal trans- former ratio associated with this shape can be found from (10 ): RLWFA=2ω ωp/radicaltp/radicalvertex/radicalvertex/radicalbt1 + (kpLp)2[1−κ0(kpLp)]3 [1−κ0(kpLp)]4, (13) whereLp=ζf/kpis the pulse length. In the linear regime optimal transforme r ratios for both LWFA and PWFA schemes scale identically with the pulse/beam length:RLWFA→(2ω/ω p)/radicalBig 1 + (kpLpulse)2, RPWFA→/radicalBig 1 + (kpLbeam)2[13]. The LWFA scheme is intrinsically more efficient by a factor of 2 ω/ω p, which is needed for viability of LWFA since lasers are typically “slower” drive rs than electron beams. UTILITY OF PULSE SHAPING The advantage of using the optimal pulse shape is best seen in comparison with the unshaped (Gaussian) pulse. For a given Gaussian pulse (o r any other non- optimal shape) one can always construct a corresponding opt imally shaped pulse with the same laser energy such that the photon deceleration across the optimal pulse equals to the peak photon deceleration in the unshaped one (i.e., both pulses have equal depletion lengths). Unshaped pulses deplete firs t in the region where photon deceleration is the largest, whereas a laser with the optimal shape loses all its energy in a depletion length due to uniform photon decele ration, thus enhanc- ing instantaneous energy deposition and wakefield. For a num erical example, we consider the optimal and Gaussian pulses of total energy 0 .5J, wavelength 1 µm and cylindrical radius 10 µm in a plasma with np= 1018cm−3. The transformer ratio, the maximum wakefield, the required pulse length, and the cor responding peak a0 are shown in Fig. 3 as a function of depletion length.Transformer Ratio 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depletion length, cm0200400600800|∂γa /∂z| / |∂γd /∂z|Maximum wakefield 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depletion length, cm0123eE||max/mc2 kp Pulse length 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depletion length, cm0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2Pulse length, λpMaximum a0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Depletion length, cm02468Max a0 FIGURE 3. Comparison of the transformer ratio, maximum wakefield, pul se length, and maxi- mum normalized vector potential in shaped (diamonds) and Ga ussian (triangles) pulses of equal depletion lengths and constant pulse energy of 0 .5J. From Fig. 3 we see that the transformer ratio and the maximum w akefield are consistently larger for shaped pulses. In fact, the lines fo r optimal pulse wakefield and transformer ratio represent the theoretical upper limi ts for all pulses of given energy. The Gaussian pulse achieves a maximum transformer r atio when its length (measured here as FWHM) equals 1 /2 of the relativistic plasma wavelength. The effects of shaping are especially prominent for longer pulse s, where Gaussian pulse yields almost no wake excitation due to plasma oscillations inside the pulse that cause part of the laser photons to absorb energy from the wake . On the other hand, a shaped laser postpones plasma oscillation until the end of the pulse, and all photons decelerate uniformly. For very short pulses, th e differences between the two shapes are minimal. This is due to the fact that very short Gaussian pulses of fixed energy asymptotically approach the delta-function li mit of the short optimal shape. For these short pulses the wakefield attains the maxim um value given by (8) as the depletion length reaches the minimal value for giv en pulse energy. Although short pulses generally produce the largest wakefie lds, their efficiency is close to minimal possible, as the depletion length decrease s faster than increase in the wake. Therefore, the choice of the appropriate pulse sha pe for LWFA stage will depend on specific experimental conditions. If the laser-pl asma interaction distance is limited by instabilities, diffraction or dephasing, then in order to maximize the electron energy gain one should try to achieve the largest ac celerating gradient, which can be accomplished with ultrashort pulses. For some r egimes of plasmadensity and laser energy available laser systems may be unab le to produce pulses short enough so that the pump depletion length is longer than the characteristic instability or dephasing length. In this case shaping the la ser will increase the wakefield over the interaction distance, even though it will be below the maximum possible if a shorter pulse were used. If the interaction len gth is less constrained, such as the case for propagation in plasma channels [14], the n using a finite-length shaped pulse will result in a greatly improved overall energ y gain per stage as can be seen from Fig. 3. An added benefit of pulse shaping is the suppression of modulational instability that affects unshaped pulses that are longer than plasma wavelength. When all photons red-shift, or “slow down”, at t he same rate, different slices of the laser do not overrun each other, and the 1D laser self-modulation is suppressed. REALISTIC PULSE SHAPING As the optimal pulse shape is associated with a delta-functi on precursor, the feasibility of such a structure may be a concern. We note that the purpose of this precursor is to bring the photon deceleration from zero in th e quiescent plasma before the laser to a finite value κ0at the beginning of the main pulse. This can also be achieved with a more physical prepulse, whose shape c an be found from the wake equation once a smooth function κ(ζ) is chosen. For our example we choose a photon deceleration function tha t varies as a hyperbolic tangent: κ(ζ) =κ0[1 + tanh(α(ζ−ζ0))]/2, whereαis a steepness parameter and ζ0is an arbitrary offset. The photon energy deposition is then ψ(ζ) =κ0[ζ+ln(cosh(α(ζ−ζ0)))/α]/2, and the corresponding laser shape is found from equation (11): a2(ζ) =κ0αsech2(α(ζ−ζ0)) χ4(ζ)+κ2 0[1 + tanh(α(ζ−ζ0))]2 χ5(ζ)+1 χ2(ζ)−1,(14) whereζ≤ζfand the function in the denominator is χ(ζ) = 1 + (κ0/2α) ln1 2+ ζ0κ0/2−ψ(ζ). As before, the pulse length ζfcan be found from the total available energy of the pulse. By varying αwe can change the slope of κ(ζ) as it rises from 0 toκ0and construct a pulse shape that satisfies experimental cons traints yet retains essential physics of the optimal shape. For a ste p-function photon deceleration ( α→ ∞) expression (14) asymptotes to equation (6). However, for finite values of αthe delta-function precursor spreads out and can even disap pear as shown in Fig. 4. The family of shapes given by (14) is better suited for the finite- bandwidth laser systems that have a lower limit on achievabl e feature size. The values of maximum wakefield for pulses in Fig. 4 is within few p ercent of the value for a delta-function optimal pulse of the same energy and dep letion length. This is due to the fact that the bulk of the laser pulse still experien ces constant maximal photon deceleration. The wakefield further degrades with lo nger rise times of κ(ζ).0 5 10 15 20 ζ00.511.52 FIGURE 4. Laser intensity (shaded) and associated photon decelerati on (−κ(ζ)) for pulses of the same total energy and characteristic depletion length i n the order of increasing α. The pulse shaping techniques described so far have assumed t hat the laser is incident on an unperturbed plasma. However, this does not ha ve to be the case, and we can construct an optimally-shaped laser that enters the p lasma at some phase of a pre-existing plasma oscillation. Such oscillation cou ld be left from a precursor laser pulse or electron beam as shown in Fig. 5. When there is a n existing plasma wave, the value x0of the modified electrostatic potential at the beginning of t he optimal pulse will generally be different from unity. In this case the expression for the optimal pulse without the delta-function precursor is m odified into: a2 l(ζ) =4κ02 [x−1 0−κ0(ζ−ζ0)]5+1 [x−1 0−κ0(ζ−ζ0)]2−1, (15) where we assume that the main pulse lies between ζ0andζf, andκ0=x′(ζ0)/x2 0. If this shape is placed in a correct phase of the oscillation ( so thata2 l(ζ0) from (15) is positive), it acts as an amplifier of the existing wake field. The ratio of maximum wakefield behind the optimal pulse to the field in fron t of it scales as (R/x2 0)(ωp/2ω) which for pulse lengths around λpfrom Fig. 3 can be of order 10. A detailed discussion of this scheme and a comparison to the re sonant laser-plasma accelerator concept [15] will be reported elsewhere. DISCUSSION As we have shown, the huge phase space involved in shaping las er drivers for applications in laser wakefield accelerators can be describ ed using only two param- eters: total pulse energy and characteristic depletion len gth. The shape of photon energy deposition (photon deceleration) inside the pulse p lays a crucial role for both the wake excitation and the evolution of the laser drive r. By varying the shape of the photon deceleration function for pulses of fixed energy and depletion length we were able to optimize both the generated wakefield a nd the efficiency of05101520253035 ζ-0.500.511.522.5 FIGURE 5. Laser intensity profiles ( a2(ζ), shaded) and normalized electric field for optimally shaped main pulse following a Gaussian precursor. the accelerating scheme. The method used for obtaining the o ptimal shapes (6) and (14) is actually more general and can be used to determine laser shapes that generate other variations in the nonlinear index of refract ion. Having a physical requirement for the refractive index, which in this case is t he requirement of uni- formity of photon deceleration, provides a constraint on th e functional form of the wakefield, which can then be used to find the required laser sha pe. Alas, such a “reverse” solution is not always guaranteed to yield a physi cal (i.e., positive) a2(ζ), so, in general, caution is advised. Several issues should be addressed before the laser pulse sh aping concept can be fully utilized. Even without the delta-function precurs or, the finite laser band- width will necessarily smooth out steep rises and falls of th e optimal pulse shape. Although we do not anticipate adverse effects when the featur e size is much smaller than the plasma wavelength, the 1D self-consistent laser ev olution and stability of realistic optimal shapes are currently under investigatio n. Another consideration is the influence of the laser-plasma interaction in the trans verse dimension on the evolution of the pulse. Many of the laser-plasma instabilit ies are seeded by the wakefield-induced perturbations of the index of refraction . As we have demon- strated in this paper, the nonlinear index of refraction can be effectively controlled through laser shaping, thus suggesting the method of delayi ng the onset of these in- stabilities. Whether this approach increases the growth ra tes of other instabilities, particularly in the transverse dimension, remains to be inv estigated. We would like to thank J. Arons, A. Charman, T. Katsouleas, W. B. Mori, and J. Wurtele for fruitful discussions and suggestions. REFERENCES 1. F. Verluise, V. Laude, Z. Cheng, et al., Optics Lett. 25, 575 (2000). 2. M. Murnane, these proceedings. 3. M. Downer, these proceedings.4. T. Tajima, J. M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267 (1979). 5. P. Chen, J. M. Dawson, R. Huff, T. Katsouleas, Phys. Rev. Let t.54, 693 (1985). 6. S. Wilks, J. M. Dawson, W. B. Mori, T. Katsouleas, M. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2600 (1989). 7. W. B. Mori, IEEE J. Quant. Elec. 33, 1942 (1997) 8. P. Sprangle, E. Esarey, J. Krall, and G. Joyce, Phys. Rev. L ett.69, 2200 (1992). 9. E. Esarey, P. Sprangle, J. Krall, A. Ting, IEEE Trans. Plas ma Sci. 24, 252 (1996). 10. E. Esarey, A. Ting, and P. Sprangle, Phys. Rev. A 42, 3526, (1990). 11. P. Chen, A. Spitkovsky, AIP Conf. Proc. 472, 321 (1999). 12. P. Chen, A. Spitkovsky, T. Katsouleas, W. B. Mori, Nucl. I nstr. Meth. 410, 488 (1998). 13. P. Chen, J. J. Su, J. M. Dawson, K. Bane, and P. Wilson, Phys . Rev. Lett. 56, 1252 (1986). 14. E. Esarey, P. Sprangle, J. Krall, A. Ting, G. Joyce, Phys. Fluids B 5, 2690 (1993). 15. D. Umstadter, E. Esarey, J. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett 72, 1224 (1994)

arXiv:physics/0008028v1 [physics.optics] 10 Aug 2000Spatial coherence of thermal near fields C. Henkel1 Institut f¨ ur Physik, Universit¨ at Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam , Germany K. Joulain, R. Carminati, J.-J. Greffet Laboratoire d’Energ´ etique Mol´ eculaire et Macroscopiqu e, Combustion, Ecole Centrale Paris, 92295 Chˆ atenay-Malabry cedex, France2 Abstract We analyze the spatial coherence of the electromagnetic fiel d emitted by a half-space at temperature Tclose to the interface. An asymptotic analysis allows to ide ntify three different contributions to the cross-spectral densit y tensor in the near-field regime. It is shown that the coherence length can be either mu ch larger or much shorter than the wavelength depending on the dominant contr ibution. PACS numbers: 42.72 (black body radiation); 73.20.M (surfa ce plasmons); 42.25.K (coherence in wave optics); 07.79.F (scanning near field opt ical microscopy) Introduction The typical textbook example of an incoher- ent source is a thermal source. From the point of view of temporal coherence, its spectrum is given by Planck’s function and modified by its emissivity. For usual sources, the emissivity is a smooth function of frequency. Thus, the spec- tral width is usually on the order of the peak frequency of Planck’s function. From the point of view of spatial coherence, a thermal source is often assumed to be delta correlated. Yet, an ex- act form of the cross-spectral density tensor has been derived for a blackbody radiator and it hasbeen shown that the spatial coherence length is λ/2 [1]. These exact results seem to support the statement that a thermal source is incoherent. Yet, one has to analyze more carefully the prob- lem when dealing with a real thermal source. In this paper, we consider a source that consists of a half space filled with a lossy material at temperature T. We are interested in the emit- ted field so that we assume that there are no other sources. Thus there is no incident radia- tion illuminating the sample. Note in particular that this is not an equilibrium situation. Since we explicitly introduce a model for the 1Corresponding author. Telephone: (49)331.977 14 98, facsi mile: (49)331.977 17 67, electronic mail: Carsten.Henkel@quantum.physik.uni-potsdam.de 2Unit´ e propre de recherche no. 288 du Centre National de la Re cherche Scientifique Preprint submitted to Optics Communications 20 july 2000source, the emitted field contains evanescent waves in the vicinity of the interface. These evanescent waves are not taken into account when dealing with blackbody radiation. Yet, they modify the coherence properties of the source in the near field as was shown in [2]. The effect is particularly striking if a resonant sur- face wave is excited. It has been shown that the coherence length can be either much larger than the wavelength or much shorter than λ/2 close to the surface. Temporal coherence is also dra- matically modified. For example, the emitted ra- diation is almost monochromatic when a surface wave is excited [3]. These results were obtained using a direct calculation of the field emitted by a half-space in the framework of fluctuation electrodynamics [4–7]. The subject of this paper is to analyze the spa- tial coherence of the emitted field by means of an asymptotic evaluation of the cross-spectral density tensor in the near-field limit (interface- detector distance small compared to the wave- length). This analysis permits to retrieve the properties reported in [2] and yields insight into the physical mechanism responsible for these ef- fects. We are thus able to identify all the pos- sible contributions to the cross-spectral den- sity tensor : thermally excited surface plasmons, skin-layer currents and small-scale polarization fluctuations. We show that to a good approx- imation, the sum of these three asymptotic contributions coincides with the exact result. We obtain different characteristic behaviours that vary in accordance with the dominant term. Surface waves such as surface plasmon- polaritons or surface phonon-polaritons yield long-range spatial coherence on a scale of the surface wave propagation length which may be much larger than the wavelength when aborp- tion is small. On the contrary, skin-layer cur- rents and small-scale polarization fluctuations lead to a much shorter spatial coherence length that only depends on the distance to the in- terface. A surprising consequence of this prop-erty is that the macroscopic theory of radiome- try may be extended into the mesoscopic regime insofar as emission is concerned. Note however that this conclusion is based on the assumption of a local medium. The ultimately limiting scale is thus given by the electron screening length or the electron Fermi wavelength, whatever is larger [8,9]. 1 Overview 1.1 Radiation emitted by a thermal source In this section, we review the source theory ap- proach we use for the computation of the ther- mal electromagnetic field [4–7]. We focus on the radiation in the vacuum close to a source that we model as a linear dielectric with dielectric function ε(r;ω). The frequency dependence will not be indicated explicitly in the following since we calculate quantities at fixed frequency (or, equivalently, at fixed wavelength λ= 2πc/ω. The source radiates because it contains a fluctu- ating polarization field P(r). The spectral den- sity of this field is characterized by the cross- correlation tensor Sij P(r1,r2) that, according to the fluctuation-dissipation theorem [4,5,10,11], is given by Sij P(r1,r2) =2¯hε0Imε(r1) e¯hω/k BT−1δijδ(r1−r2) (1) The Kronecker δijand the spatial δ-function in this formula follow from the assumption that the dielectric function is isotropic and local. We have taken the normal-ordered form for the po- larization field spectrum since we are ultimately interested in the electromagnetic field measured by a photodetector (given by normally-ordered field operators [1,10]). The electric field E(r) ra- diated by the polarization P(r) is now given by 2the Green function for the source geometry Ei(r) =/integraldisplay Vdr′/summationdisplay jGij(r,r′)Pj(r′) (2) where Vis the volume of the source, i.e., the do- main where Im ε(r′) is nonzero according to (1). All quantities in (2) are understood as tempo- ral Fourier transforms at frequency ω. The co- herence function Wij(r1,r2) of the electromag- netic field is now obtained as a thermal average of (2), using the polarization spectrum (1). One obtains [2,3] Wij(r1,r2)=2¯hε0 e¯hω/k BT−1/summationdisplay k/integraldisplay Vdr′Imε(r′)× ×Gik∗(r1,r′)Gjk(r2,r′) (3) The problem is now to evaluate this expression analytically and to obtain an estimate for its de- pendence on the separation s≡r2−r1between the observation points. 1r1r2 separation distance zS separation distance zSr +-+ - + -vacuum sourcevacuum source fluctuating polarisation Fig.1: Model geometry for a planar source. To proceed in the calculation, we focus on the simplified geometry shown in figure 1: an infi- nite half-space with uniform dielectric constant ε, separated by the plane z= 0 from the empty half-space z > 0. For this arrangement, the Green tensor is explicitly known as a spatial Fourier transform with respect to the lateral separation S= (sx, sy)≡R2−R1. Details may be found in [10,12,13] and in appendix A. As tobe expected for this source geometry, the elec- tric coherence tensor depends on the distances z1, z2of the observers and their lateral separa- tionS. For simplicity, we put in the following z1=z2=z. We also normalize the coherence tensor Wijto its value for r1=r2in the case of blackbody radiation Wbb=2¯hk3 3πε0(e¯hω/k BT−1)(4) where as usual k=ω/c. As outlined in ap- pendix A, we thus get the following expression for the spatial Fourier transform of the coher- ence tensor wij(S, z) =Wij(S, z) Wbb =/integraldisplayd2K (2π)2eiK·S−2zImγwij(K) (5) where Kdenotes a wave vector parallel to the interface and ( K, γ) is the vacuum wave vec- tor of a plane wave emitted by the source. The tensor wij(K) is given in appendix A, eq.(A.10). The integration over Kin (5) also includes wave vectors |K|> k, describing evanescent waves the source excites in the vicinity of the interface (the quantity γis then purely imaginary with positive imaginary part). 1.2 Near field coherence function In this subsection, the typical behaviour of the field coherence function is discussed. We identify several distance regimes showing a very different behaviour of the lateral coherence function. An- alytical approximations for the coherence func- tion are deferred to the next section. In figure 2 is shown the ‘energy density’ (the trace of the coherence tensor at coinciding posi- 30.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. z/λ10−31103106energydensity [arb. u.](a) Au@620 nmAu@400 nm 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1. z/λ1 0.110100 energydensity[arb. u.](b) Au@620 nm W@500 nm Fig. 2. Energy density Tr wij(S=0,z) vs. distance from a metal surface. Dots: numerical evaluat ion of the integral (5), solid lines: sum of the asymptotic approximat ions discussed in the text. In the far field, the numerically computed value is taken. (a): log-log scale for gold at λ= 620nm ( ε=−9.3 + 1.2i) and at λ= 400nm ( ε=−1.1 + 6.5i). The dielectric constants are extracted from [14]. Dashed line: 1/z3power law dominating the extreme near field; dotted line: exponentially decaying contribution of excit ed surface modes. (b): log-linear scale, showing the exponentially decaying surface plasmon contribution for gold at λ= 620nm. For comparison, the case of tungsten at λ= 500nm is shown where no plasmon resonance is found ( ε= 4.4 + 18i). tions) above a metal surface in double logarith- mic scale. One observes a strong increase with respect to the far field energy density when the distance zis smaller than the wavelength. For moderate distances z≤λ, the energy density is dominated by an exponentially increasing con- tribution [cf. fig.2(b)]. This is due to the ex- citation of surface plasmon resonances, whose contribution is calculated analytically in sub- section 2.1. The other curve in fig.2(b) shows the energy density for the case of tungsten with Reε >−1 where no surface mode exists and no exponential increase is found. For small dis- tances z≪λ, the energy density follows a 1 /z3 power law (‘static limit’) that is discussed in subsection 2.2. The prefactor of this power law involves the imaginary part of the electrostatic reflection coefficient Im[( ε−1)/(ε+1)]. The sec- ond curve in fig.2(a) illustrates the resonantly enhanced energy density for a wavelength where Reε≈ −1. The ‘static limit’ contribution then overwhelms that of the plasmon resonance. In figure 3, we show the normalized lateral co- herence function at chosen distances from the interface. In the far field [plot 3(a)], the coher-ence length is λ/2, and the coherence function the same as for the blackbody field ((sin ks)/ks behaviour). This is not surprising since at large distances z≫λ, only propagating plane waves radiated into the vacuum half space contribute to the field. When the surface plasmon excitation dominates the field energy ( z≤λ), the field coherence extends over much longer distances [plot 3(b)]. This is because of the weak damping of the plas- mon modes in this case. We show below (sub- section 2.1) that the coherence length is indeed given by the plasmon propagation length. The figure also shows that the field is strongly po- larized perpendicular to the interface, as is the surface plasmon mode. At distances z≪λeven closer to the source, the field coherence length gets shorter again [plot 3(c)]. We show below that in this regime, the field behaves as if it was quasi-static (sub- section 2.2). This leads to a lateral coherence length equal to the vertical distance zfrom the interface and hence much shorter than the wave length. We thus find the surprising result that 4thermal near fields have no lower limit in their coherence length, as long as the dielectric func- tion of the source may be taken as local. One might finally ask whether the skin depth δ[defined in (23)] is relevant for the radiation emitted by a metallic source. This question is discussed in subsection 2.3 where we show that in the regime δ≪z≪λ, a different power law (∝1/z2) governs the energy density (see fig.4(a) below). The lateral coherence behaves similar to the static regime z≪δ, however, as shown in fig.4(b) below. 2 Analytical approximations 2.1 Plasmon contribution It is well known that a dielectric-vacuum in- terface supports surface plasmon polariton (or phonon polariton) modes provided the dielec- tric constant satisfies Re ε <−1 [15,16]. These surface modes propagate parallel to the surface with a wave vector Kpland are exponentially localized in the direction perpendicular to the interface. In addition, if there are losses in the dielectric, the propagation parallel to the inter- face is damped which may be described by a nonzero imaginary part of Kpl. Mathematically, we obtain the plasmon dispersion relation by identifying the poles of the transmission coeffi- cients tµ(µ= s,p) as a function of the wave vec- torK. Only the p-polarization (magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of incidence) gives a pole at the (complex) position Kpl=k/radicaligg −ε −ε−1,ReKpl,ImKpl>0(6) The plasmon pole shows up as a sharp peak when the integrand wij(K) in (5) is plotted as a function of the lateral wave vector magnitude K[cf. eq.(A.10)]. This suggests that we get agood approximation to the plasmon contribu- tion by taking slowly varying terms outside the integral and evaluating the pole contribution by contour integration. For example, the denomi- nator of the |tp|2transmission coefficient may be approximated as 1 |εγ+γ2|2≈4|ε|2 |ε+ 1||ε−1|2Im1 K2−K2 pl(7) where γ=γ(K) and γ2are the vertical wave vector components above and below the inter- face. It is essential for the contour integration to work that one expresses the absolute square on the left hand side as the imaginary part of an analytic function of K(right hand side). It is easily checked from (A.10) that the trace ofwij(K) only depends on the magnitude Kof the lateral wave vector K. The integration over the angle between KandStherefore gives Trwij(S, z) = ∞/integraldisplay 0KdK 2πJ0(Ks) e−2zImγTrwij(K) (8) where J0(·) is the ordinary Bessel function and s=|S|. The individual tensor components also involve Bessel functions J2(Ks), as discussed in appendix B.1. The integration over Kmay be done using the identity (B.2) proven in ap- pendix B.2.1. The diagonal elements of the co- herence tensor finally take the suggestive form wii(S, z)≈Cple−2κplzgi(Kpls) (9) g/bardbl(u) =1 2Re/bracketleftbigg H0(u)−H2(u)−4i πu2/bracketrightbigg (10) g⊥(u) =1 2Re/bracketleftbigg H0(u) +H2(u) +4i πu2/bracketrightbigg (11) gz(u) =|ε|ReH0(u) (12) Cpl=3π 2|ε|2 |ε+ 1|7/2. (13) 50 0.5 1. 1.5 2. s/λ00.51correlation(a) z=10λ Au@620nm 0 1. 2. 3. 4. s/λ00.51correlation(b) z=0.1λ Au@620 nm wzz(z,s) wxx(z,s) 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 s/λ00.51correlation(c) wzz(z,s) wxx(z,s)Au@620 nm z=0.01λ skin depth δ=0.05λ Fig. 3. Normalized lateral coherence functions for three fix ed distances z, plotted vs. the lateral separation s=|S|. All plots are for a gold surface at λ= 620nm. Dots: numerical evaluation of (5), solid lines: ana - lytical approximations discussed in the text. The numerica lly computed values were used to normalize all curves. (a): far field regime z= 10λ. The trace of the coherence tensor is plotted, normalized to its value for s= 0. Solid line: free space coherence function sin( ks)/(ks). (b): plasmon dominated regime z= 0.1λ. The components wxxandwzzare plotted, normalized to (the numerically computed) wzz(S=0,z). (c) static regime z= 0.01λ. The components wxxandwzzare plotted and normalized as in plot 3(b). The solid curve only contains the extreme near-field contributi on (17). where κpl= Im γ(Kpl) is the perpendicular plasmon decay constant and H0,2(·)≡H(1) 0,2(·) are Hankel functions (or Bessel functions of the third kind) [17]. The superscripts ∝bardbl,⊥indicate the directions parallel and perpendicular to the separation vector Sin the interface plane. Eq.(9) shows that the plasmon resonance gives a contribution to the energy density that increases exponentially when approaching the source. This behaviour is reproduced by the numerical evaluation of (A.10), as shown in fig. 2(b). As a function of the lateral distance s, the correlation tensor eq.(9) shows damped oscillations whose wavelength is fixed by the plasmon wave vectorKpl, as shown in fig.3(b). These oscillations can be made explicit using the asymptotic form of the Hankel function [17] |Kpls| ≫1 : Hn(Kpls)≈/radicaligg 2 πKplsei(Kpls−π/4−nπ/2)(14) We thus conclude that the propagation distance of the plasmon resonance, as contained in the imaginary part of Kpl, determines the coherence length of the field in this regime. For a dielectric constant with small imaginary part, the inverse 6propagation distance is approximately ImKpl≈(ReKpl)3 k2Imε 2(Reε)2≪k.(15) Thermally excited plasmons thus lead to a spa- tially coherent field on a length scale well ex- ceeding the vacuum wave length. They also cre- ate a net field polarization, as shown by the anisotropy of the tensor elements in (10-12) [see also fig.3(b)]. This anisotropy may be under- stood from the fact that the coherence between points separated by Sis created by plasmons propagating parallel to this direction, and the latter are polarized in the plane spanned by S and the normal vector ez. 2.2 Extreme near field: quasi-static regime We now turn to the near field limit z≪λ. Inspecting the integrand of (A.10), one finds that in addition to the plasmon resonance, large wave vectors K≫kdominate the integral. This is because the exponential cutoff e−2zImγ(K)≈ e−2zKgets effective only for K≥1/z≫k. We thus obtain the asymptotic behaviour of the in- tegral when we expand the integrand to leading order in the limit 1 /z≥K≫k. The transmis- sion coefficients, e.g., become in this limit |tp|2≈4|γ2|2|ε| K2|ε+ 1|2/parenleftigg 1 +k2 K2Reε ε+ 1/parenrightigg |ts|2≈4|γ2|2 K2/parenleftigg 1 +k2 4K2Re (ε+ 1)/parenrightigg (16) We perform the integration over Kusing eq.(B.8), as explained in appendix B.2.2 and get the following asymptotic form for the diagonal elements of the cross-correlation tensor wii(S, z)≈Cxnf (kz)3gi(s/z) (17)g/bardbl(u) =1−u2/2 (1 +u2/4)5/2(18) g⊥(u) =1 (1 +u2/4)3/2(19) gz(u) =2−u2/4 (1 +u2/4)5/2(20) Cxnf=3 32Imε−1 ε+ 1=3 16Imε |ε+ 1|2(21) The coherence tensor given by (17) shows a power law increase 1 /z3when the interface is approached, as plotted in fig. 2(a). It therefore takes over compared to the plasmon contribu- tion in the ‘extreme near field limit’ z≪1/κpl. In this regime, the lateral coherence of the field is characterized, as shown by the scale func- tionsgi(s/z) in (18-20), by a lorentzian shape whose scale is set by the distance zto the source. Hence, the closer one detects the field, the more it is spatially incoherent. This behaviour may be understood from elec- trostatics: in the near field, the electromagnetic fields behave as if they were quasi-static because they vary on a length scale much smaller than the wave length (retardation is negligible). A near field detector is thus sensitive to a source area of the order of πz2, and spatial coherence is observed when these areas overlap, hence for a separation smaller than the distance z. Simi- lar arguments have also been put forward to in- terpret subwavelength resolution in optical near field microscopy [18,19]. The electrostatic anal- ogy may be pushed even further: it is easily checked that we get the same result as (17) using electrostatic image theory. As a consequence of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem [4,5,10,11], we have indeed Wij(r2,r1)∝ImGij(r2,r1) ∝ImEi image(r2;¯r1,¯dj), (22) where Gijis again the electric Green function. The electric field Eimageis created by the image 7¯djof a dipole dj(polarized along the xj-axis) at position r1, the image dipole being located at the mirror position ¯r1= (x1, y1,−z1). This image dipole field dominates the Green func- tionGijat sufficiently close distance from the source if the electrostatic reflection coefficient (ε−1)/(ε+ 1) has a nonzero imaginary part [see eq.(21)]. We stress that there is no lower limit to the spa- tial coherence length of the near field, provided one uses the framework of a local dielectric sus- ceptibility. Model calculations for a free elec- tron gas confined to a half-space show that this framework breaks down at wave vectors Kof the order of the Fermi wave vector [8,9]. For our problem, this corresponds to typical distances of the order of 0 .1 nm that are difficult to achieve for near field probes even in the optical range. 2.3 Relevance of the skin depth It has become clear from the two preceding sub- sections that the lateral coherence of near field radiation strongly depends on the distance of observation to the source. It might have been ex- pected that the skin depth shows up in this dis- cussion, since it governs the penetration depth for electric fields into the metal. We conclude our analytical work by identifying the relevance of this length scale. Recall that the skin depth is given by δ=λ/2π Im√ε(23) For good conductors and low frequencies, the dielectric function is dominated by its zero- frequency pole ε=iσ ε0ω(24)where σis the (possibly frequency dependent) conductivity. In particular, one has |ε| ≫ 1 andδ≪λin this regime: the source material hence approaches a perfect conductor. This im- plies that the large Kexpansion of the trans- mission coefficients in (A.10) has to be recon- sidered: while the limit K≫kmay be jus- tified, the limit K≫k|√ε|may be not. We find that there exists an intermediate distance regime δ≪z≪λ(corresponding to wave vec- torsk|√ε| ≫K≫k) where the coherence tensor shows a different behaviour [20]. The ex- pansion of the transmission coefficients in this regime reads |tp|2≈4|γ2|2 |ε|K2/bracketleftigg 1 +O/parenleftiggK k√ε/parenrightigg/bracketrightigg |ts|2≈4|γ2|2 |ε|k2/bracketleftigg 1 +O/parenleftiggK k√ε/parenrightigg/bracketrightigg (25) We finally get an isotropic coherence tensor wii(S, z)≈3 16δ kz2g(s/z) (26) g(u)=1 (1 +u2/4)3/2(27) The skin layer dominated regime is thus char- acterized by a 1 /z2power law for the energy density. As shown in figure 4(a), the skin depth δseparates this regime from the extreme near field where a different power law 1 /z3prevails. We observe from fig.4(b) and (26) that the lat- eral coherence length is equal to the distance zfrom the source, as in the extreme near field regime. This is not so surprising since the field propagation in the vacuum half space above the source is governed by the length scales λand z, whatever the smaller, while the skin depth is only relevant for the propagation inside the source. 80.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. z/λ10−31103106energydensity[arb. u.](a) FIR skin depth 0.02 0.04 0.06 s/λ00.51correlation(b) wzz(z,s) wxx(z,s)FIRz=0.015λ skin depth Fig. 4. Near field coherence in the skin-effect dominated regi meδ≪z≪λ, typical for metals in the far infrared. Dots: numerical evaluation of the integral (5), l ines: analytic asymptotics discussed in the text. (a): energy density Tr wij(S=0,z) above a metallic surface with ε=−8.26 + i104(gold extrapolated to λ= 3.7µm). The solid line is the sum of the asymptotic contributions derived in this paper. (b): normalized lateral coherence functions wii(S,z)/wzz(0,z) (i=x, z) for fixed distance z, plotted vs. the lateral separa- tions=|S|. The x- and z-polarizations differ because the plasmon contribution alr eady comes into play. The numerically computed wzz(0,z) was used to normalize all curves, this is why the analytic co rrelations exceed unity. To conclude, we recall that the different contri- butions to the correlation tensor originate in dis- tinct domains on the K-axis in the integral (5). The total correlation tensor is therefore given by the sum of the surface plasmon, extreme near field, and skin-layer contributions. The accuracy of this approximation is visible in figs.2, 4(a). Note that in the figures, the numerically com- puted far-field energy density has been added to get the correct large distance limit. 3 Conclusion In the near field, the spatial coherence of ther- mal radiation differs strongly from the black- body field. Confined field modes like surface plasmon polaritons that propagate along the source surface make the field spatially coherent over large scales if they dominate the radiation density. At close distance (smaller than the skin depth), the radiation is dominated by quasi- static fields, and the coherence length drops well below the wave length, being limited only by the (non)locality of the dielectric response of the source material. The cross over between these regimes is determined by the skin depth andthe electrostatic reflection coefficient. We con- clude that in the near field, macroscopic con- cepts like a local emissivity are still meaningful at the subwavelength scale, provided coherent surface excitations are absent or subdominant. The asymptotic forms for the cross spectral density tensor obtained in this paper are use- ful to characterize thermal noise fields that may perturb particles in integrated microtraps ‘mounted’ with electromagnetic fields above a solid surface [21–28]. The concomitant scatter- ing and decoherence of the guided matter waves is discussed elsewhere [29,30]. The fluctuation electrodynamics used in this pa- per enabled us to treat a non-equilibrium situa- tion (thermal source in vacuum at T= 0) where the fluctuation-dissipation theorem for the elec- tric field is not immediately applicable. In par- ticular, we neglected the zero-point radiation impinging on the interface from the empty half- space. The domain of validity of this approxi- mation, as well as the calculation of anti-normal ordered correlation functions will be the subject of future investigations. 93.0.0.1 Acknowledgements. C.H. thanks S. Scheel for many fruitful exchanges. A Notations for the plane interface The Green tensor describing the emission from the source z′<0 into the vacuum half space z >0 may be written in spatial Fourier space as [10,12] Gij(r,r′) =/integraldisplayd2K (2π)2eiK·(R−R′)Gij(K, z, z′) Gij(K, z, z′) =ik2 2ε0γ2 ×/summationdisplay µ=s,pe(t) µ,ie(2) µ,jtµei(γz−γ2z′)(A.1) We use bold capitals to denote vectors parallel to the interface, e.g.,K= (kx, ky,0). The ver- tical components of the wave vectors in vacuum and inside the source are, respectively, γ= +√ k2−K2,Imγ >0 (A.2) γ2= +√ εk2−K2,Imγ2>0 (A.3) The polarization vectors for the s- (or TE-) and p- (TM-)polarized waves are taken as e(t) s=e(2) s=ˆK׈ez (A.4) e(t) p=Kˆz−γˆK k(A.5) e(2) p=Kˆz−γ2ˆK√εk(A.6) where ˆKis the unit vector parallel to K. Finally, with this choice for the polarization vectors, the Fresnel transmission coefficients are ts=2γ2 γ+γ2, t p=2γ2√ε εγ+γ2(A.7)When the Green tensor (A.1) is inserted into the integral (3), the spatial integration over R′ yields a δ-function for the lateral wave vectors. The integration over z′is then 0/integraldisplay −∞dz′e−i(γ2−γ∗ 2)z′=1 2 Imγ2(A.8) where the convergence is ensured by the posi- tive imaginary part of γ2. The resulting coher- ence tensor is then of the form (5). We use the identity k2Imε= 2 Im γ2Reγ2 (A.9) and get after some elementary algebra: wij(K)=3π 4kReγ2 |γ2|2× ×/summationdisplay µe(t) µ,ie(t)∗ µ,j|e(2) µ|2|tµ|2(A.10) B Components of the coherence tensor In this appendix, we outline the calculation for the components of the coherence tensor. B.1 Angular integrations The only quantities in (A.10) that depend on the angle ϕbetween the lateral wavevector K and the separation Sare the polarization vec- torseµ. To simplify the calculation, we choose thex-axis parallel to S. We then get the follow- ing azimuthal integrals (eq.9.1.18 of [17]) π/integraldisplay −πdϕ πeiKscosϕ sin2ϕ cos2ϕ =J0(Ks)±J2(Ks)(B.1) 10The integrals with sin ϕcosϕvanish due to par- ity. We also note that one also gets nonzero off- diagonal elements Wxz, Wzxdue to p-polarized modes. For simplicity, these are not discussed here. B.2 Radial integrations We are left with integrals over the radial wave vector K. These are worked out using the defi- nitions (A.6) of the polarization vectors and the transmission coefficients (A.7). B.2.1 Plasmon pole To find the plasmon contribution, we extract, as mentioned in the main text, the pole of the tp coefficient and approximate the other factors by their values at the pole. The remaining integral can be reduced to the following standard form ∞/integraldisplay 0xdx x2−q2J0(xs) =iπ 2H(1) 0(qs) (B.2) for Im q >0, s > 0. To prove this identity, we use contour integration. The Bessel function is written as ([17], eqs. 9.1.3, 9.1.39) J0(x) =1 2/bracketleftig H(1) 0(x)−H(1) 0(eiπx)/bracketrightig (B.3) where H(1) 0(x) is the Hankel function. The inte- gral may now be written as 1 2∞/integraldisplay eiπ∞xdx x2−q2H(1) 0(xs) (B.4) with an integration path running just above the negative real axis. The Hankel function is ana- lytic in the upper half plane and vanishes expo-nentially for |x| → ∞ there [see eq.(14)]. There- fore, closing the integration contour with a half circle, the integral is given by the residue at the polex= +q(because Im q >0), and we get ∞/integraldisplay eiπ∞xdx x2−q2H(1) 0(xs) = iπH(1) 0(qs) (B.5) This proves (B.2). Taking the imaginary part, we find both the trace and the zz- component (12) of the correlation tensor (9). For the xx- and yycomponents of the coher- ence tensor, we also need the integral (B.2) with the Bessel function J2(xs) instead of J0(xs) [cf. eq.(B.1)]. Using the same reasoning as above, this integral is transformed into 1 2∞/integraldisplay eiπ∞xdx x2−q2H(1) 2(xs) (B.6) In addition to the pole at x=q, we now have a contribution from the −4i/(xs)2singularity of the Bessel H(1) 2(xs) function at the origin. This singularity lies on the integration path and is therefore taken into account by half its (neg- ative) residue at x= 0. Combining the latter with the residue at x=q, we get ∞/integraldisplay eiπ∞xdx x2−q2H(1) 2(xs) = iπH(1) 2(qs)−4π q2s2(B.7) We may verify the sign of the second term by checking that the function (B.7) vanishes in the limits→0, as is the case for the left hand side of (B.6). B.2.2 Near field regime In the near field regimes K≫k|√ε|(extreme near field) and k|√ε| ≫K≫k(skin layer dominated regime), the expansions (16, 25) of 11the transmission coefficients are straightforward to obtain. The final integration involves integer powers of Ktimes products of Bessel functions and exponentials and is performed using the fol- lowing identity ∞/integraldisplay 0dK J0(Ks)e−2Kz=1√ 4z2+s2(B.8) This may be proven starting from the Fourier expansion of the Coulomb potential (writing k= (K, kz)) 1 r=1 2π2/integraldisplay d2Kdkzeik·r k2(B.9) and evaluating the integral over the vertical wave vector component kzwith contour integra- tion (for z >0, a single pole at kz= i|K|con- tributes). The derivatives of (B.8) with respect tozandsthen provide all necessary integrals. References [1] L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical coherence and quantum optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995). [2] R. Carminati and J.-J. Greffet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1660. [3] A. V. Shchegrov, K. Joulain, R. Carminati, and J.-J. Greffet, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2000), in press. [4] E. M. Lifshitz, Soviet Phys. JETP 2 (1956) 73, [J. Exper. Theoret. Phys. USSR 29, 94 (1955)]. [5] D. Polder and M. V. Hove, Phys. Rev. B 4 (1971) 3303. [6] J. Schwinger, J. Lester L. DeRaad, and K. A. Milton, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 115 (1978) 1. [7] S. M. Rytov, Y. A. Kravtsov, and V. I. Tatarskii, Principles of Statistical Radiophysics (Springer, Berlin, 1989), Vol. 3, Chap. 3.[8] P. J. Feibelman, Progr. Surf. Sci. 12 (1982) 287. [9] G. W. Ford and W. H. Weber, Phys. Rep. 113 (1984) 195. [10] G. S. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. A 11 (1975) 230. [11] S. Scheel, L. Kn¨ oll, and D.-G. Welsch, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 700. [12] A. A. Maradudin and D. L. Mills, Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975) 1392. [13] C. Henkel and J.-Y. Courtois, Eur. Phys. J. D 3 (1998) 129. [14] E. Palik, Handbook of optical constants of solids (Academic, San Diego, 1985). [15] Surface Polaritons, edited by V. M. Agranovich and D. L. Mills (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982). [16] H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings, Vol. 111 of Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1988). [17] Handbook of Mathematical Functions, ninth ed., edited by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1972). [18] J.-J. Greffet and R. Carminati, Progr. Surf. Sci. 56 (1997) 133. [19] C. Henkel and V. Sandoghdar, Opt. Commun. 158 (1998) 250. [20] C. Henkel, S. P¨ otting, and M. Wilkens, Appl. Phys. B 69 (1999) 379. [21] J. P. Dowling and J. Gea-Banacloche, in Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys., edited by P. R. Berman (Academic Press, New York, 1997), Vol. 37, Suppl. 3, pp. 1–94. [22] V. I. Balykin, in Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys., edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic, San Diego, 1999), Vol. 41, pp. 181– 260. [23] J. Schmiedmayer, Eur. Phys. J. D 4 (1998) 57. 12[24] M. Key et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 1371. [25] J. Reichel, W. H¨ ansel, and T. W. H¨ ansch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3398. [26] R. Folman, P. Kr¨ uger, D. Cassettari, B. Hessmo, T. Maier, and J. Schmiedmayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4749. [27] N. H. Dekker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 1124.[28] D. M¨ uller, D. Z. Anderson, R. J. Grow, P. D. D. Schwindt, and E. A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 5194. [29] C. Henkel and M. Wilkens, acta phys. slov. 50 (2000) 293 [quant-ph/0005038]. [30] C. Henkel and S. P¨ otting, “Coherent transport of matter waves”, submitted for publication in Appl. Phys. B. [quant-ph/0007083] 13

arXiv:physics/0008029v1 [physics.chem-ph] 10 Aug 2000Discrete solvent effects on the effective interaction betwee n charged colloids E. Allahyarov and H. L¨ owen Institut f¨ ur Theoretische Physik II, Heinrich-Heine-Uni versit¨ at D¨ usseldorf, D-40225 D¨ usseldorf, Germany (February 2, 2008) Using computer simulations of two charged colloidal sphere s with their counterions in a hard sphere solvent, we show that the granular nature of the solvent sign ificantly influences the effective colloidal interaction. For divalent counterions, the total effective force can become attractive generated by counterion hydration, while for monovalent counterions th e forces are repulsive and well-described by a solvent-induced colloidal charge renormalization. Both effects are not contained in the traditional “primitive” approaches but can be accounted for in a solvent -averaged primitive model. PACS: 82.70.Dd, 61.20.Ja Supramolecular aggregates, such as colloids, polymers or biological macromolecules, are typically suspended in a molecular solvent which guarantees their stability and profoundly influences their viscoelastic properties [1]: e x- amples range from paints to dense DNA-solutions in bi- ological cells. A full “ab initio” statistical description of supramolecular solutions should start from a molecu- lar scale including the solvent explicitly. Obviously this is a tremendous task due to the large length scale sep- aration between the microscopic solvent and the meso- scopic solute and the enormous number of solvent par- ticles which have to be considered explicitly. Therefore, most of the common statistical approaches are based on so-called “primitive” models insofar as they disregard the molecular nature of the solvent completely such that sol- vent properties only enter via a continuous background. A particular example for such a separation of length scales are charged colloidal suspensions [2] consisting of highly charged mesoscopic particles (so-called polyions) suspended in water or any other organic solvent together with their oppositely charged microscopic counterions. The key quantity to understand the stability, structure and dynamics of such colloidal dispersions is the effec- tive interaction between two polyions, as a function of their mutual distance r. Neglecting the discrete sol- vent this quantity has been calculated using modeling on different descending levels: i) the “primitive model” (PM) of strongly asymmetric electrolytes which takes into account explicitly the counterions ii) the nonlin- ear Poisson-Boltzmann approach which is inferior to the PM as it neglects counterion correlations, iii) the lin- earized screening theory resulting in a Yukawa form for the effective interaction potential as given by the electro- static part of the celebrated Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey- Overbeek (DLVO) theory [3]. The main effects of non- linear Poisson-Boltzmann theory can be encaptured by a similar Yukawa potential but with “renormalized” pa- rameters leading to the concept of colloidal charge renor- malization [4]. This picture is consistent with experimen- tal data in dilute bulk solutions with monovalent counte- rions [5,6]. Very strong correlations between divalent and trivalent counterions, however, may lead to attractive ef- fective forces between like-charge polyions as shown inrecent computer simulations of the PM [7–9]. Lσp σc σsh FIG. 1. View of the set-up as a projection of a simula- tion snapshot: Two polyions (dark open circles) in a bath of solvent particles (small hollow spheres) contained in a sph e- rocylindric cell of width h. The counterions shown as small dark spheres can move in the whole simulation box of size L. In this Letter, we investigate the influence of solvent granularity on the effective interactions between charged colloids. We explicitly add to the PM a molecular solvent modelled by a hard sphere fluid. We study this model by direct computer simulation and use the concept of effec- tive interactions to overbridge the gap between micro- scopic and mesoscopic length scales. Our motivation to do so is twofold: First, although the dipolar nature of the solvent [10] is not included, the model provides a minimal framework towards a statistical description of hydration forces. Second, the solvent hard sphere model was con- sidered in earlier studies for the effective interaction be- tween charged plates using liquid integral equations [11], modified Poisson-Boltzmann theory [12] or more sophis- ticated density functional approaches [13]. All these de- scriptions, however, suffer from additional uncontrolled 1 Typeset using REVT EXapproximations such that “exact” computer simulation results are highly desirable. Such simulations were per- formed for parallel plates [14] and for small neutral par- ticles [15] but are hitherto not available for spherical charged colloids. We implement a new “solvent bath” simulation scheme which allows to simulate many neutral spheres together with the charged species and obtain explicit results for the effective force between nano-sized highly charged col- loids. We use these data to test a theory with solvent- averaged effective interactions between the charged parti- cles similar in spirit to the old McMillan-Mayer approach for electrolyte solutions [16]. This solvent-averaged pri m- itive model (SPM) yields good agreement with the sim- ulation data and can thus be used to obtain the effec- tive interaction between larger colloidal particles. For monovalent counterions and large distances r, our simu- lation data can be described perfectly within a Yukawa- potential with a solvent-induced polyion charge and screening length renormalization. For divalent counte- rions and nano-sized colloids, we find an attractive force. Both effects are not contained in the PM. We consider two large spherical polyions with diame- terσpand charge qpat distance r, together with their counterions of diameter σcand charge qcin a bath of a neutral solvent ( qs= 0) with diameter σs. In our model, the pair potentials between the particles as a function of the mutual distances rare a combination of excluded volume and Coulomb terms Vij(r) =/braceleftbigg ∞ forr≤(σi+σj)/2 qiqj/ǫrelse(1) where ǫis the a smeared background dielectric constant of the solvent and ( ij) = (pp),(pc),(ps),(cc),(cs),(ss). Further parameters are the thermal energy kBTand the partial number densities ρi(i=p, c, s) which can be expressed as partial volume fractions φi=πρiσ3 i/6 (i= p, c, s). Charge neutrality requires ρp|qp|=ρc|qc|. We fix the two polyions along the body diagonal in a cubic simu- lation box of length Lwith periodic boundary conditions, hence ρp= 2/L3. In a dense fluid solvent ( φs≈0.3), many solvent spheres are in the box, such that a direct simulation is impossible. Thus we resort to the following “solvent-bath” procedure: we define a spherocylindrical cell around the colloidal pair such that the minimal dis- tance hfrom the colloidal surface to the cell boundary is larger than the hard sphere bulk correlation length ξ, see Figure 1 for the set-up. The hard sphere solvent is only contained in this spherocylinder while the counteri- ons can move within the whole simulation box. We use the Molecular Dynamics (MD) method to calculate the particle trajectories. Once a solvent particle is leaving the spherocylindrical cell, it is randomly inserted at an- other place of the cell boundary with the same velocity and a random depth in order to avoid unphysical solvent layering on the cell surface. Since his much larger than ξ, the presence of the boundary has no influence on the inhomogeneous density distribution of the solvent andthe counterions near the colloidal surfaces. For a coun- terion approaching the cell boundary, however, there is an artificial asymmetry between the solvent bath inside the cell and the “vacuum” outside the cell which hinders a counterion to penetrate into the solvent bath. This unphysical effect is repaired in the simulation scheme by switching off the counterion-solvent interaction for a counterion which is penetrating from outside. Once the counterion is fully surrounded by solvent molecules the interaction is turned on again. This procedure guarantees a symmetric crossing rate of counterions across the sphe- rocylindrical cell. In the solvent-free space outside the cell, the counterion-counterion interaction is still Vcc(r) as the mean counterion distance is much larger than ξ such that the Coulomb repulsion dominates solvent de- pletion effects. The algorithm was carefully tested for solvent slabs between charged plates and perfect agree- ment was found compared to simulations where the whole space was filled with solvent particles. In our simulations, we fixed T= 298oKandǫ= 81 (water at room temperature) with σs= 3˚A,φs= 0.3 (such that ξis about 3 σs) and σc= 6˚A. The width h is 12σssuch that typically Ns= 25.000−30.000 solvent hard spheres are simulated. We varied the polyion size σp and charge qpand calculated the solvent- and counterion- averaged total force acting onto a polyion for a given colloidal distance r. The force is projected onto the sep- aration vector of the two colloidal spheres such that a positive sign means repulsion. This effective force F(r) is the sum of four different contributions [7]: the direct Coulomb repulsion as embodied in Vpp(r), the counterion screening resulting from the averaged Coulomb force of counterions acting onto the polyions, the counterion de- pletion term arising from the hard sphere part of Vpc(r), and the solvent depletion force. For nano-sized colloids, explicit results for F(r) are presented in Figures 2a and 2b. For nearly touching polyions (full curves in the insets of Figs. 2a and 2b) the force exhibits oscillations on the scale of the solvent diameter due to solvent layering leading to attraction for touching polyions as the attractive solvent depletion part exceeds the bare Coulomb repulsion. For larger distances and monovalent counterions, the force is repulsive. Sim- ulation data for the PM are also included which overesti- mate the force. The repulsion is even stronger in DLVO theory as derived from the Yukawa pair potential V(r) =q2 pexp(−κ(r−σp)) (1 +κσp/2)2ǫr(2) withκ=/radicalbig 4πρcq2c/ǫkBT. For divalent counterions, on the other hand, there is attraction within a range of sev- eral polyion diameters. This attraction originates from counterion overscreening induced by hydration, as the pure PM yields repulsive forces. Intermediate between the PM and the full solvent sim- ulation, we put forward a description on the primitive 2 Typeset using REVT EX1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 r/σp010203040 F(r) σp/kBT 1 1.2 1.4 r/σp−200−1000100200 F(r) σp/kBT I I IIIIIa) PM SPM DLVO1 1.1 1.2 1.3 r/σp−400−2000200400F(r) σp/kBT 2 3 4 5 r/σp−3−2−10123456F(r) σp/kBT I IIIIIb) PM SPM 1.3 FIG. 2. Reduced distance-resolved force F(r)σp/kBTversus reduced distance r/σp. The inset shows the same for nearly touching polyions of molecular distances. a ) for monovalen t counterions and σp:σc:σs= 10 : 2 : 1; b) for divalent counterions andσp:σc:σs= 14 : 2 : 1. The further parameters are |qp/qc|= 32 and φp= 5.8×10−3. Solid line with error bars: full solvent bath simulation; long-dashed line: SPM; short-das hed line: PM; open circles: DLVO theory; dot-dashed line in i nset: solvent depletion force. The dotted line in a) is the solvent -renormalized Yukawa model. levelwith solvent-averaged interactions between the charged particles which provides a simple physical pic- ture of discrete solvent effects. In fact, by tracing out the solvent degrees of freedom exactly, one arrives at addi- tional solvent-induced interactions on the primitive leve l for which we approximately only consider pairwise terms. This defines the solvent-averaged primitive model (SPM). The additional depletion interactions in hard sphere mix- tures have been studied extensively by theory [17] and simulation [18]. The polyion-polyion solvent-induced de- pletion force is also included in Figure 2 exhibiting os- cillations on the scale of the molecular solvent diameter σs. While the additional solvent-averaged counterion- counterion interaction is much smaller than the Coulomb repulsion, the solvent-averaged polyion-counterion inte r- action results in a deep counterion attraction towards the colloidal surfaces with a molecular range and a po- tential energy depth of several kBT, describing granular hydration forces. The only approximation used to derive the SPM is that solvent-induced many-body forces be- tween the charged particles are ignored. This is justified as typical distances between triplets of charged particles are larger than ξexcept for nearly touching polyions with “squeezed” counterions. We determine the additional de- pletion interaction of the SPM by a reference simulation of two spheres in a hard sphere solvent [18] and use them as an input for a simulation of the SPM. As can be deduced from Figure 2, the SPM describes the solvent bath data extremely well, yielding results that lie within the statistical error of the full simulation over the whole range of distances. We finally use the SPM to investigate solvent effects forpolyion sizes in the colloidal domain. Distance-resolved colloidal forces F(r) for monovalent counterions are pre- sented in Figure 3. These forces are repulsive but much smaller than those from PM simulations or DLVO the- ory. This is due to counterion accumulation near the colloidal surface as induced by the additional solvent de- pletion attraction. As the corresponding potential energy gain is only few kBT, this depletion attraction is differ- ent from chemisorption of counterions. For very large distances, on the other hand, the screening of the re- maining free counterions will dominate the interaction which can be described by a cell model [4]. To test this, we have performed additional solvent-bath simu- lations for a single polyion in a spherical cell of radius R= (4πρp/3)−1/3calculating the counterion density ˜ρcat the cell boundary. The corresponding effective Yukawa potential has the same form as in eq.(2) but with a solvent-renormalized screening length κ∗=κ/radicalbig ˜ρc/ρc and a solvent-renormalized charge q∗ p=qp˜ρc/ρcwhich is considerably smaller than the bare charge. The ac- tual value of this renormalized charge, however, differs strongly from the charge renormalization according to the PM or Poisson Boltzmann theory [4]. The force re- sulting from the solvent-renormalized Yukawa model fits our full simulation data of nano-sized colloids for large distances and monovalent counterions (see Figure 2a) and perfectly describes the SPM data for larger colloids except for molecular distances (see Figure 3). Conse- quently, a Yukawa model can still be used but the pa- rameters have to be suitably renormalized. Clearly, the repulsive Yukawa model breaks down if no free counteri- ons are left as is the case for, e.g., divalent counterions 3 Typeset using REVT EXand nano-sized colloids. 1 2 3 4 r/σp0100200300400500F(r) σp/kBTDLVO SPMPM FIG. 3. Same as Fig.2 but now for larger polyions σp:σc:σs= 370 : 2 : 1, |qp/qc|= 280, φp= 2.3×10−3, and monovalent counterions. The dot-dashed line here is the PM with colloidal charge reduction by the corresponding av- erage amount of counterions in a shell of width ξaround the colloids. The meaning of the other lines is as in Figure 2a. We finally remark that the traditional justification of the PM is to define a bare charge by fixing all the coun- terions which are in a molecular shell around the colloids and to treat the rest within the PM. This picture of polyion charge reduction works for chemisorption but not for the weaker hydration forces. In fact, if the polyion charge is reduced by the corresponding average counte- rion charge in a shell of thickness of the solvent bulk correlation length ξ, the PM still overestimates the force considerably, see the dot-dashed line Figure 3. In conclusion, based on a unified statistical description of counterion hydration and screening, we have shown that hydration forces profoundly influence the colloidal interaction. For divalent counterions, there is solvent- induced attraction which is not contained in the tradi- tional primitive model but can be encaptured within a solvent-averaged primitive model. For monovalent coun- terions, the forces can be described by a charge renor- malization induced by counterion hydration forces. This picture is in agreement with experiments on strongly deionized samples where a Yukawa picture can still be employed, provided the colloidal charge is renormalized towards a value smaller than the bare charge [5,19]. The general concept of charge renormalization should be transferable to other situations where screening by few remaining “free” counterions dominates the interaction as, e.g., for a polar solvent, for different polyionic surfac e charge patterns and for explicit surface chemistry. We thank R. Roth, C.N. Likos and T. Palberg for help- ful remarks.[1] “Structure and Dynamics of Strongly Interacting Col- loids and Supramolecular Aggregates in Solution” edited by S.-H. Chen, J. S. Huang, P. Tartaglia, NATO ASI Se- ries, Vol. 369, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1992. [2] J. P. Hansen, H. L¨ owen, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chemistry, October 2000, in press. [3] B. V. Derjaguin, L. D. Landau, Acta Physicochim. USSR 14, 633 (1941); E. J. W. Verwey and J. T. G. Overbeek, “Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids” (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1948). [4] S. Alexander, P. M. Chaikin, P. Grant, G. J. Morales, P. Pincus, D. Hone, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5776 (1984). [5] W. H¨ artl, H. Versmold, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 7157 (1988); T. Palberg, W. M¨ onch, F. Bitzer, R. Piazza, T. Bellini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4555 (1995). [6] J. C. Crocker, D. G. Grier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 352 (1994); G. M. Kepler, S. Fraden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 356 (1994); D. G. Grier, Nature (London) 393, 621 (1998). [7] E. Allahyarov, I. D’Amico, H. L¨ owen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1334 (1998). [8] P. Linse, V. Lobaskin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4208 (1999). [9] R. Messina, C. Holm, K. Kremer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 872 (2000). [10] M. Kinoshita, S. Iba, M. Harada, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2487 (1996). [11] F. Otto, G. N. Patey, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4416 (1999); J. Chem. Phys. 112, 8939 (2000). [12] V. Kralj-Iglic, A. Iglic, J. Physique II (France) 6, 477 (1996); J. Borukhov, D. Andelman, H. Orland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 435 (1997); Y. Burak, D. Andelman, to be published; E. Trizac, J.-L. Raimbault, cond- mat/9909420. [13] Z. Tang, L. E. Scriven, H. T. Davis, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 4527 (1994); L. J. D. Frink, F. van Swol, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2884 (1996); T. Biben, J. P. Hansen, Y. Rosen- feld, Phys. Rev. E 57, R3727 (1998) C. N. Patra, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 9832 (1999); D. Henderson, P. Bryk, S. Sokolowski, D. T. Wasan, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3896 (2000). [14] See e.g.: D. Boda, D. Henderson, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 8934 (2000). [15] J. Rescic, V. Vlachy, L. B. Bhuiyan, C. W. Outhwaite, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 3611 (1997). [16] W. G. McMillan, J. E. Mayer, J. Chem. Phys. 13, 276 (1945). [17] M. Dijkstra, R. van Roij, R. Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2268 (1998); B. G¨ otzelmann, R. Roth, S. Dietrich, M. Dijkstra, R. Evans, Europhys. Lett. 47, 398 (1999). [18] R. Dickman, P. Attard, V. Simonian, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 205 (1997); M. Dijkstra, R. van Roij, R. Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 117 (1999). [19] T. Gisler, S. F. Schulz, M. Borkovec, H. Sticher, P. Schurtenberger, B. D’Aguanno, R. Klein, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 9924 (1994). 4 Typeset using REVT EX

RBF neural net based classifier for the AIRIX accelerator fault diagnosis J.C. Ribes, G. Delaunay LAM - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne - F51687 REIMS cedex2 J. Delvaux, E. Merle, M. Mouillet CEA - PEM F51490 Pontfaverger - France Abstract The AIRIX facility is a high current linear accelerator (2-3.5kA) used for flash-radiography atthe CEA of Moronvilliers France. The general background of this study is the diagnosis and the predictive maintenance of AIRIX. We will presenta tool for fault diagnosis and monitoring based onpattern recognition using artificial neural network.Parameters extracted from the signals recorded oneach shot are used to define a vector to be classified. The principal component analysis permits us to select the most pertinent informationand reduce the redundancy. A three layer RadialBasis Function (RBF) neural network is used toclassify the states of the accelerator. We initializethe network by applying an unsupervised fuzzy technique to the training base. This allows us to determine the number of clusters and real classes,which define the number of cells on the hidden andoutput layers of the network. The weights betweenthe hidden and the output layers, realising the non- convex union of the clusters, are determined by a least square method. Membership and ambiguityrejection enable the network to learn unknownfailures, and to monitor accelerator operations topredict future failures. We will present the firstresults obtained on the injector. 1. INTRODUCTION The AIRIX induction accelerator [1] is used forflash radiography . The single shot functioningneeds to be optimal at the desired time. We try todefine a supervision method for fault diagnosis for the AIRIX facility. The goal is to garanty optimal functioning and to search precursors for the knownfailures in developping predictive maintenance .We are interessed to diagnosis using patternrecognition with neural network, and particularlyRBF nets. RBF neural nets are employed for supervised classification. We propose an original strategy to create RBF nets for unsupervisedclassification.First we present the experimental context and thegoal of the study. In the following paragraphs, we develop the strategy used for defining an adaptative supervised classifier with unsupervised data.Finally, we expose the first results obtained for theinjector based on data from the year 1999 to thefirst trimester 2000.2. EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT The AIRIX facility consists in an injector, 32 highvoltage generators and 64 induction cells. Thesingle shot functioning imposes to obtain the best performances at a given time. We try to develop a predictive maintenance based on signal processingand pattern recognition. Firstly this application is anhelp for users, principaly to have a most precisediagnosis and an automatic quick view of the stateof the accelerator during the experiments. Secondly the results of automatic recognition could be an help to detect functioning drift to plan maintenanceoperations.About 300 signals are recorded during eachexperiment. The complexity of the installationimposes to decompose the different module into sub-systems to realize a precise diagnosis. Signal processing permits to caracterize electrical signalsof the machine. Those parameters define the stateof functioning as a vector to be classified. Wefocus on the injector to develop a prototype of supervisor. The injector [2], which creates the electron beam, can be separated in three mainmodules : the prime power, the laser commandedspark gaz and the vacuum diode. The electron beam(4MeV,2kA,60ns) is created by applying on thecathode of the diode a pulse of 4MV. The prime power, which furnishes the primary high voltage, is caracterized by 8 parametres. For the sparks, whichallow the discharge of the prime power into thediode along 3 transfert lines, 15 parametres areused. The firing of the 4 sparks must be realizedsimultaneously with approximativly the same current level. Finally the vacuum diode, in which the electrons are emited is diagnosed by 18features. Those parameters are characteristicalvalues, such as rise time, half height, temporalposition of the different peaks and frequencyvalues. The collected data are used to define a supervised training base for an automatic classification of failures.The first step (part3) is to analyse the unsuperviseddata to define a training set and the differentexisting states. The second step (part 4) consists in classifying the data with an artificial supervised neural network. 3. UNSUPERVISED DATA ANALYSIS The fuzzy-c-means algorithm [3] allows to clusterdata by minimizing the following fuzzy criteria.()∑∑ ===m in ji jp ij gxd u J 112),(. m is the number of classes and n the number of points. d is the euclidian distance and u ij the fuzzy membership of data x j to the class i. Each cluster is defined by a center or prototype note gi. p is the fuzzyfication of the criteria and is generally takento 2.The algorithm is composed of the following steps. • initialise m, g and U. • Start with an initial partition • Determine the center g i with () () ∑ ∑ = ==n jp ijn jkp ij i u x u g 1 1. • update U with ∑ =−     −−=m jp j ik i ki gxgxu 111 22 1 • Cluster with the new centers The algorithm is iterated until the stability of the prototypes. The principal drawback of this technicis that we impose the number of class. Thecompacity criteria allows to determined the sufficiant number of protoype to cluster the data. We use it for a multiprototype approach of theclustering. A class is caracterized by multiplecenters. The number of real class in the data isdetermined by cutting a hierarchical tree calculate on the centers. We used the minimization of the function K as a criteria [4] to resolve the problem ofcalculating the level of cutting. [] [] ∑ ∑∑∑∑ = ==== ==−= m jn iijn ii j ij moym jn ii j ij glmoygl ugxdu mcogxduncococo K 1 112112 ),(.1),(.1with 1 co is the compacity in a multiprotoype approach. This method has permited to define the different classes and a supervised training data set. The defined classes have been succesfully physicallyidentified. 4. RBF NEURAL NET CLASSIFIER They are constructed with 3 layers (fig 1). The hidden neurons use a non linear radial basis function activation [5]. We use a classical gaussianform for this function.  −=22),( exp)j(x2 σϕi jgxd where d is the euclidian distance between an observation and the considered neuron and σ is the size of the gaussian. The weigths between the hidden and the output layer are adjust during the training step.The structure of the neural network is presented onthe next figure. Figure 1 : RBF neural network The classification is realized on the maximum membership principle . A data is affected to theclass with the maximal output, determined by : ∑ ==m ij ik j k x w xy 1)( )( ϕ avec k=1,2,…s. The most important problem is to define the number of cells on the hidden layer. We propose to use the results of the precedentsection to define the number of neural cells. Thecenters, which define the clustering can beinterpreted as the hidden neurons and the cut of thetree defined the number of output neural cells. Each hidden neuron is now seen as a fuzzy set with a gaussian membership function of size σ. The parametre σ is calculated with the following formula. )) ( min(21 li kjg gd− =σ gkj is the hidden neuron i belonging to the class k and g li the neuron i of a class l with k . lk≠ Finally the network is trained with the known data defined at the paragraph 3. The training consists inresolving a linear system with the least square algorithm. The variables to determine are the weight of the last layer and the output is 1 if thedata belong to the class and 0 otherwise.With this last step, we dispose of a model able toclassify the data initialy unsupervised, without theknowledge of the number and the membership of data to class. In case of unknown state the reject options are used. They allow to detect observationswich can't be reliably classified. An observation toofar from the others is membership rejected. If anobservation is too close from different classes, it isambiguity rejected The first reject is a way to detect knew state for adaptation of the classifier. The second reject permits to detect the evolution ofthe functioning from one class to another.5. RESULTS We have defined an observation space for the three subsystems of the injector. The unsupervisedanalysis of the data permits to detect and to learndifferents state of the injector's functioning. The AIRIX facility is operational since the beginning of the year 2000. We know only few failures, but weare able to caracterize the different levels offunctioning. The injector is used with three levelcorresponding to the voltage applyed to the vacuum diode (initial energy of the beam), 2.3MeV 3MeV and 4 MeV (nominal mode).Each sub system contains at the initialization 3classes, one for each level, the other classescorresponding to the known failures . The followingfigures present the space of decision for the injector's subsystem (fig 2, 3 4). We note that the differents classes are well discrimated and allow agood decision making. -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-40-20020-40-35-30-25-20-15-10-505 451 111111222222 533 333 Classe 4 : Transformer failure .Transition to class 4 Figure 2 : prime power -7-6-5-4-3-2-1012 -4-2024-2.5-2-1.5-1-0.500.511.5 22 22 2212 1 111 1111 1 1 11 3 333 33 33 44 44 444 2.3MeV3MeV3.8MeV Sparks dispersion Figure 3 : spark gaz-7-6-5-4-3-2-10123-6-4-202468 -8-6-4-2024 44111111116Etat initial 6 26 2 26666 3555 52.3MeV 3MeV3.8MeV Failure Electrical breakdownReflected pulse breakdown Figure 4 : vacuum diode The most current state of functioning and theprincipal failures (electrical breakdown on the diode's pannel, dispersion on the spark functioning) have been learned by the classifier. We have obtainthe following results of good recognition with ourprototype. Table 1 : results of classification System Rejected error succes P r i m e 4 31 03 8 0 spark 32 5 402 diode 44 0 390 The number of rejected point could be ameliorated with an adaptation of the classifier to new states. Mistake in decision have been identified as aconfusion between levels of energy and never asthe non detection of a failure. 6. CONCLUSION A prototype of classifier with RBF neural net isnow built. The good properties of the RBF neuralnet allow a good decision making, completetd withthe reject options, which improve the reliability ofthe results. This strategy permits a good diagnosis of the installation. We must extend the results to the whole accelerator and use them for the maintenancestrategy. 7. REFERENCES [1] Merle E. et al Installation of the AIRIX induction accelerator Proc. Of LINAC98, 1998. [2] Fockler J. et al A 4MV ±1% flat-top electron driver Proc. Of IEEE IPPC91, 1991. [3] Bezdek J.C. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms Plenum Press New York and London 1981. [4] Devillez A. Contribution à la classification floue de données comportant des classes de formesquelconques PHD thesis University of Reims 1999. [5] Looney CG. Pattern recognition using neural network, theory and algorithms for engineers and scientists Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York 1997.

arXiv:physics/0008031 10 Aug 2000Fermilab FERMILAB-Conf-00/178-T August 2000 THEORY AND SUPPRESSION OF MULTIBUNCH BEAM BREAKUP I N LINEAR COLLIDERS* C. L. Bohn and K.-Y. Ng, Fermilab, Batavia, IL 60510, USA Abstract We recently developed an analytic theory of cumulat ive multibunch beam breakup that includes a linear vari ation of transverse focusing across the bunch train. The focusing variation saturates the exponential growth of the beam breakup and establishes an algebraic decay of the transverse bunch displacement versus bunch number. In this paper we illustrate how the focusing variation works to suppress multibunch beam breakup, as well as how the mechanism scales with accelerator and beam paramete rs. 1 RESULTS OF ANALYTIC THEORY We recently developed an analytic theory of cumulat ive multibunch beam breakup (MBBU) with a linear variat ion of transverse focusing (a form of BNS damping) alon g the bunch train [1]. It is based on a continuum form o f the equation of motion of point bunches in which the di screte transverse kicks imparted by the rf structures are smoothed along the linac. For a generic linac in a linear collider, the solution is: with the auxiliary relations _____________________ *Work supported by the Universities Research Associ ation, Inc., under contract DE-AC02-76CH00300 with the U.S. Department of Energy. denotes position along the linac normalized agains t the total linac length ; M denotes time referenced to the lead bunch -- M is the bunch number, is a representative deflecting dipole-wake frequency, an d is the temporal bunch spacing; | /G91M()| is the envelope bounding the bunch displacement xM() as measured from the steady-state displacement xSS(/G15M); x0 is the initial offset of the misaligned input beam; focusing is ta ken to vary as -1/2; acceleration is taken to be constant; the bunches are presumed to reside neither close to a resonance nor close to a wake zero-crossing. Scali ng with respect to the following linac and beam parameters is included: initial and final "energies" (0), (), respectively; deflecting-wake quality factor Q; deflecting- wake amplitude w0; bunch charge q; number of betatron periods N; the total fractional energy spread across the bunch train f, which is twice the total fractional focusing variation; and the total number of bunches M in a train. The particle charge e and rest-energy mc2 also appear. A linear focusing variation (or energy spread) acro ss the bunch train may be established by chirping the radiofrequency (rf) power sources, or by using rf- quadrupole focusing magnets. It then influences MB BU through an effective deflecting wake [1], /G76/G81/G3 /G90/G75/G76/G70/G75/G3 /G11) is the unit step function and Qeff is an effective quality factor: (2 Qeff)-1=(2Q)-1+iN|f|/(/G48). To have an impact, the focusing variation needs to be large enough that | f| > /G48 /G18/G11/G21NQ). Of course, if Q were sufficiently low, MBBU will be correspondingly low, and the focusing variation would not be needed. The expression for the MBBU envelope reflects a number of physical processes. The coefficient invo lving beam energy manifests adiabatic damping. The facto r |sin(/2)| is a relic of a resonance function deriving fr om coupling between the deflecting-mode frequency and the bunch spacing; the expression is valid only away fr om wake zero-crossings and resonances. The fractional energy spread | f| regulates exponential growth, and finite Q generates exponential damping. The singularity at =1 is an unphysical artifact of the solution technique ; the solution actually varies smoothly through the value indicated for =1. However, exponential growth saturates at =1 and afterward, for infinite Q, the envelope decays algebraically with bunch number M. Therefore =1 is the global maximum in the envelope | /G91M|, and for the focusing variation to be effective, one should ensu re that( )[ ] ( ) , 1 ;E 2(1/3) 341near not ; 11 2sin 2M42M - E )(exp E )() 0 ()( 6 / 11/64 / 124 / 1 M       =Γ  −× ≅ πηωτπωτ η σγγσδ Q c xx o [ ]; ) 0 () 1 ((0))((0)2 )() 0 (d )(1; 41 ; 2112atg21121 )(;M ) 1 ()( M),E( M),( ;M) 1 ()( ) 0 (2w(1) M),E( 02 / 122 21/2 22 0 γγγσγγ σγγσσηηπη ηηη ηη ησ σσησ γπσ σγ −−= ′=Σ      ≥<        −−+− =ΣΣ=    ΣΣΣ= ∫cMfNmcNqe/G108),Msin()2 /Mexp()M()M,(0 ωτ ωτ ωτ σeff eff Q w w − Θ==1 is reached somewhere along the bunch train befor e it exits the linac, i.e., by ensuring | f| > E(1,M)/(N). 2 NUMERICAL EXAMPLES The analytic solution allows one to decipher the li near- collider parameter space in terms of, e.g., the pro jected emittance, as is done in Ref. [1]. Herein, using n umerical examples, we illustrate the aforementioned physical processes associated with a linear focusing variati on. Table 1 gives baseline parameters used for this pur pose. Table 1: Baseline Parameters Parameter Value Total initial energy (0)mc210 GeV Total final energy (1)mc21 TeV Linac length 10 km Number of betatron periods N100 Bunch charge q 1 nC Number of bunches in train M90 Bunch spacing 2.8 ns Deflecting-wake frequency /214.95 GHz Deflecting-wake quality factor Q /G146 Deflecting-wake amplitude w01015 VC-1m-2 2.1 Analytic vs. Numerical Solutions Figure 1, depicting the bunch train at the linac ex it, shows good agreement between the envelope | xM(1)| calculated analytically and bunch displacements /G91M(1) calculated by solving the equation of motion numeri cally. It also shows the qualitative difference in the bun ch-train pattern between <1 and >1; with the parameters of Table 1, | f| = 2.2% corresponds to =1. Thus, a modest (few-percent) focusing variation suffices to suppre ss MBBU, as Stupakov observed in simulations of a contemporary Next Linear Collider lattice [2]. Of course, were the wake amplitude too large or the focusing t oo weak, then a correspondingly larger focusing/energy spread is required, as is illustrated in Fig. 2. 2.2 Saturation of Exponential Growth As shown in Fig. 3, the difference in the patterns of Fig. 1 arises from saturation of the growth factor c()E. As exceeds unity, the envelope | /G91M| decays algebraically, varying as a negative power of M. The gradual deca y of MBBU for >1 is seen in the bottom curve of Fig. 1. Thus, in suppressing MBBU, a linear focusing variat ion acts differently from exponential decay that accomp anies a finite deflecting-wake Q. The bunch train tends to be centered about the stea dy- state displacement which, in the presence of a focu sing variation, oscillates harmonically with bunch numbe r M. Consequently, as shown in Fig. 4, the bunch train i tself assumes a complicated form. Because a linear colli der brings bunch trains from two distinct linacs into c ollision,the final-focus system must damp the displacements to ensure the bunch-to-bunch overlap at the interactio n point is sufficient to achieve the desired multibunch lum inosity. However, Fig. 4 applies to the case Q /G146/G30/G3/G68/G3/G79/G82/G90/G3Q would simply leave a residual oscillation from any focusi ng variation present; the spread of bunches about the steady- state curve would be exponentially damped. Figure 1: Displacement ( xM-xSS)/x0 vs. bunch number M at linac exit for Table 1 parameters and f = 0 (top), 1.5% (middle), 3% (bottom). Solid curves are analytic solutions for the envelop e; circles are numerically calculated displacements. 2.3 Finite Deflecting-Mode Quality Factor Figure 5 depicts the influence of a finite Q relative to that of a nonzero energy spread | f|. It shows the displacement | x90-xSS|/x0 of the last bunch M= M=90 at the linac exit plotted for various values of Q. Given the parameters in Table 1, the energy spread will be us eful in suppressing MBBU provided | f(%)| > 100 /G48 /G18/G11/G21NQ) = Transverse Displacement (referenced to steady-state displacement, normalized to initial offset) Bunch Numberf = 0 f = 1.5% f = 3%3,800/Q. One can see from Fig. 5 how this criterion manifests itself; the displacement is approximately independent of energy spread until the stated thres hold is exceeded, after which the displacment drops off rel atively fast with increasing | f|. However, Fig. 5 also shows that the displacement is sensitively dependent on Q. Accordingly, designing rf structures for a linear c ollider involves trading between low deflecting-wake Q and high shunt impedance of the accelerating mode [3]. Figure 2: Threshold energy spread | f| (corresponding to =1 at the linac exit) versus deflecting-wake amplitude w0 and number of betatron periods N = 80 (top), 100, 120, 140 (bottom). Figure 3: Growth factor c()E at the linac exit versus bunch number M for | f| = 0 (top), 1.5% (middle), 3% (bottom). Figure 4: Numerically calculated displacement xM/x0 at the linac exit versus bunch number M for f = 3%.Figure 5: Displacement |x90-xSS|/x0 of the last bunch M= M=90 at the linac exit versus energy spread | f| for Q = 8,000 (top), 5,000 (middle), 3,000 (bottom). The "effectiveness criterion" is |f(%)| > 3,800/ Q, with the threshold shown for each case (dots). 3 CONCLUSIONS We discussed an analytic solution of the equation o f transverse motion for multibunch beam breakup with a linear focusing/energy variation across the bunch t rain. The solution is, by design, applicable to the main linacs of linear colliders. It constitutes a nontrivial extr apolation from work done in the early 1990s wherein analytic results were derived for all regions of linac param eter space, but without such BNS damping [4]. A key reward is the ability to decipher the inheren t parametric scaling. We presented two conditions th at both need to be fulfilled for the focusing/energy v ariation to be effective, one relating to linac and beam par ameters separate from the deflecting-wake Q (the ">1 criterion"), and the other relating to Q explicitly. With parameters representative of a linear collider, a modest energ y spread suffices to suppress MBBU, a finding that is consis tent with Stupakov's simulations of an NLC main linac [2 ]. Of course, the focusing/energy variation cannot be arb itrarily large; practical limitations such as longitudinal b eam requirements at the interaction point, lattice chro maticity, etc., impose constraints beyond the two that we des cribed. The authors are grateful to M. Syphers and G. Stupakov for stimulating discussions. REFERENCES [1] C. L. Bohn, K.-Y. Ng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 984 (2000). [2] G. Stupakov, SLAC Report No. LCC-0027 (1999), and in these Proceedings. [3] Z. Li, T. Raubenheimer, these Proceedings. [4] C. L. Bohn, J. R. Delayen, Phys. Rev. A 45, 5964 (1992). Threshold Energy Spread (%) Wake Amplitude (V/pC/mm/m) Bunch NumberGrowth Factor Bunch NumberNormalized Displacement Normalized Displacement Energy Spread (%)N = 80 100 120 140 |f| = 0 1.5% 3% f = 3%Q = 8,000 5,000 3,000

DRIVER ACCELERATOR DESIGN FOR THE 10 KW UPGRADE OF THE JEFFERSON LAB IR FEL D. Douglas, S. V. Benson, G. A. Krafft, R. Li, L. Merminga, and B. C. Yunn Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA23606, USA Abstract An upgrade of the Jefferson Lab IR FEL [1] is now u n- der construction. It will provide 10 kW output light power in a wavelength range of 2 –10 µm. The FEL will be driven by a modest sized 80 –210 MeV, 10 mA e n- ergy-recovering CW superconducting RF (SRF) linac. Stringent phase space requirements at the wiggler, low beam energy, and high beam current subject the design to numerous co nstraints. These are imposed by the need for both transverse and longitudinal phase space manag e- ment, the potential impact of collective phenomena (space charge, wakefields, beam break -up (BBU), and coherent synchrotron radiation (CSR)), and interactions between the FEL an d the accelerator RF system. This report a ddresses these issues and presents an accelerator design solution meeting the r equirements imposed by physical phenomena and oper ational necessities. 1 DESIGN REQUIREMEN TS The Jefferson Lab IR Upgrade FEL will be an evol u- tionary derivative of the JLab IR Demo FEL. As such, it retains the paradigm invoked for the earlier machine – that of a low peak, high average power wiggler -driven optical cavity resonator with an energy recovering SRF linear accelerator driver o perating at high repetition rate. The 10 kW design goal will be achieved via an increase in both drive beam power (doubled current and quadrupled energy) and FEL extraction efficiency (from ½% to 1%), and will be accommodated through use of an R5 optical cavity geom etry [2]. This system concept imposes two fundamental r e- quirements on the driver accelerator d esign: • the accelerator must deliver an electron beam to the wiggler with the phase space appropriately configured to drive the FEL interaction, and • it must energy recover the beam after the FEL. The first requirement reflects the need of the FEL for specific electron beam properties at the wiggler. These, and other relevant system parameters, are presented in Table 1. Particularly important are high charg e and a short bunch (to provide high peak current for sufficient FEL gain). The energy recovery requirement alleviates demands on the RF drive system (both installed power and RF window tolerances), limiting cost and reducing radiation power from the dumpe d drive beam. Both primary requirements imply numerous subsidiary constraints that must be met in the presence of pheno m- ena that can provoke beam quality degradation with co n- sequential poor system performance. These include space charge, BBU, CSR, and the FEL/RF interaction. Amongst the subsidiary constraints are: • full (6 -d) phase space matching at the wi ggler, • longitudinal matching and transverse beam size control during energy recovery, • preservation of beam quality in the presence of the aforementioned phenomena, • large acceptance energy recovery transport, and • insensitivity to, and means for the compensation of, typical accelerator errors such as misalig n- ments, excitation errors and phase errors. These requirements parallel those imposed on the JLab I R Demo FEL driver; the scope is, however, som e- what more challenging, as inspection of Table 1 implies. Not only must the charge per bunch double, the bunch length at the wiggler must halve so as to quadruple the peak cu rrent; moreover, the energy recovery process must a ccomm odate double the momentum spread. 2 DESIGN SOLUTION Figure 1 illustrates a machine design solution meeting the above requirements. It comprises a 10 MeV injector (an upgrade of the existing IR Demo injector from 5 to Table 1: IR Demo and Upgrade Parameters Parameters Dem o Upgrade Achieved (5/2000) energy (MeV) 35-48 80-210 20-48 Iave (mA) 5 10 5 FEL rep. rate (MHz) 18.75 -75 3.9-125 18.75 -75 Qbunch (pC) 60 135 @ 75 MHz 135 @ 37.5 MHz bunch σl (psec) 0.4 0.2 @ 135 pC 0.4 @ 60 pC Ipeak (A) 60 270 @ 135 pC 60 @ 60 pC σδp/p (%) ¼% ½% ¼% @ 60 pC εN (mm -mrad) <13 <30 5-10 @ 60 pC 25 @ 135 pC ηFEL ½% 1% >1% ΔEfull after FEL 5% 10% 6-8% 10 mA), a linac con sisting of three Jefferson Lab cry o- modules generating 70 to 200 MeV of energy gain, and a recirculator. The latter provides beam transport to, and phase space conditioning of the accelerated electron beam for, the FEL and then returns and prepares the dri ve beam for energy recovery in the linac. A summary of the function of each machine section will now be pr ovided. The injector is a direct upgrade of the IR Demo inje c- tor [3] from 5 mA at 10 MeV to 10 mA at 10 MeV. The current will be doubled by an increas e of the single bunch charge from 60 pC to 135 pC while maintaining the 75 MHz repetition rate. Adequate source and injector performance has already been demonstrated at the el e- vated bunch charge at a source -limited repetition rate of 37.5 MHz [4] and will be characterized at full power when a higher power RF drive system is installed. Transverse and longitudinal phase space management begin in the injector. A four quad telescope matches beam envelopes to the betatron acceptance of the dow n- stream linac, whi le the choice of RF parameters and momentum compaction of the injection line conspire to produce a long, low momentum spread bunch at the l inac. The linac, which will accelerate the beam by 70 to 200 MeV, comprises three Jefferson Lab cryomodules; the first and third are conventional 5 -cell CEBAF designs, the central module is based on new 7 -cell Jlab cavities [5]. The lower gradient 5 -cell modules are placed at the end of the accelerator to limit RF focussing induced mismatch of the low energy injected and energy reco v- ered beams. Quad triplets between modules provide beam envelope control during both acceleration and e n- ergy recovery; the beam is accelerated (energy reco v- ered) off crest (off trough) so as to impose a phase e n- ergy correlation on the longitudi nal phase space. This is used in subsequent tran sport to longitudinally match the beam to the required phase space at the wiggler (dump). The first segment of the recirculator provides tran s- port of the drive beam from the linac to the FEL. Imm e- diately foll owing the linac, a small dipole separates the energy recovered and full energy beams, directing the low energy beam to a dump. A set of three additional identical d ipoles completes a chicane of the high energy beam, r eturning it to the linac axis and dire cting it through a six quad tel escope, which transversely matches it to a recirc ulation arc. This arc, based on a Bates g e- ometry [6], is used to tran sport the beam to the machine backleg and to longitud inally condition it in preparation for the FEL i nterac tion. The arc first and second order momentum co mpactions (M 56 and T 566) are selected (u s- ing trim quads and sext upoles) to rotate the bunch (which has been slewed by off -crest acceleration) upright at the wiggler and to elim inate phase space curvature, pro duc- ing a short bunch and high peak current. Downstream of the arc, a FODO tran sport line conveys the beam to the FEL inse rtion. The FEL insertion commences with a chicane around the upstream end of a 32 m R5 high power optical cavity. This provides cleara nce between electron beam and opt i- cal components and generates momentum compaction for a final compression of the bunch length to that r e- quired at the wiggler. A six quad telescope transversely matches the beam to the wiggler; a second telescope downstream of the wiggler provides a transverse match from wiggler to the energy recovery transport. A pair of small chicanes embedded in the telescopes allows inco r- poration of a 16 m broadband optical cavity, which will be used for initial FEL tune -up. The energy recovery transport consists of a second Bates -style endloop (returning the beam to the linac) followed by a six quad telescope. The beam is matched to the arc by the second telescope of the FEL insertion; the energy recovery telescope matches beam envelope s from the arc to the linac acceptance. Trim quads, sext u- poles, and octupoles in the arc adjust momentum co m- pactions through third order to longitudinally rotate the short, very large momentum spread bunch and adjust its curvature and torsion in preparatio n for energy recovery. As energy recovery occurs off -trough, the imposed phase -energy correlations are selected to generate e n- ergy compression during energy recovery, yielding a long, low momentum spread bunch at the dump. Figure 1: Jefferson Lab 10 kW IR Upgrade FEL. The machine is shown in the facility vault. -505101520253035 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 path length (m)(m)beta x beta y 10*eta xlinac linac FEL arc arc -505101520253035 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 path length (m)(m)beta x beta y 10*eta xlinac linac FEL arc arc linac linac FEL arc arc Figure 2: Lattice Functions in IR Upgrade 3 SINGLE PARTICLE D YNAMICS The accelerator design is being evaluated using sta n- dard methods. Figure 2 provides the obligatory plot of lattice functions; the chromatic and geometric variations of these and other relevant phase space parameters has been e xamined for both the linac to wigg ler and wiggler to linac transports. The overall system behavior in these initial studies is appropriate for the support of FEL o p- erations. Ray -tracing simulations of energy recovery from wiggler to the linac back -end suggest that IR Demo performance can b e duplicated with proper adjustment of the linear, quadratic, and cubic momentum compactions of the Upgrade tran sport system. 4 BEAM DYNAMICS AND COLLECTIVE PHENOMENA Beam dynamics concerns include configuration of the electron beam for the FEL interactio n and the impact of collective effects. Initial studies at 135 pC indicate source performance is adequate. To achieve the higher peak cu rrent in the Upgrade, the longitudinal phase space can be managed as in the Demo [7]. Adiabatic damping will r educe the bunch intrinsic relative momentum spread (the “thic kness” of the slewed phase ellipse) after the module; when rotated upright at the wiggler, the bunch will then be shorter. Recirculator sextupoles will be used in concert to compensate both lattice and RF - waveform induced curv ature of the long itudinal phase space. A number of collective phenomena can compromise system performance. These include space charge, wak e- field effects, BBU, CSR, and the FEL/RF interaction. All are under examination within the contex t of the machine design presented above. Space charge effects are signif i- cant primarily in the injector and at the energy recovery dump; at energies over 25 MeV, IR Demo experience indicates system behavior will be insensitive to space charge driven phenom ena. To date, adequate performance at the design single bunch charge of 135 pC has been demonstrated. Further PARMELA and empirical analysis of machine performance, particularly in the injector, will occur as the project continues [8]. A preliminary analys is of wakefield effects [9] su g- gests an impendence budget based on (2” aperture) IR Demo components will yield marginally acceptable beam performance at the FEL. This is a “worst case” result subject to improvement through use of larger (3”) ape r- ture co mponents, which may be allowed following a cost-risk-benefit analysis of the vacuum system design. Preliminary results extracted from a rudimentary CSR simulation u sing a 1 -dimensional longitudinal wake model suggest Upgrade performance will not be co m- promised by CSR effects. Future work will involve the application of a more sophisticated CSR model to the design; this will allow comprehensive analysis of CSR effects in the sy stem, including dependence on details of charge distrib ution within the bunch [10]. Investigation of BBU effects suggests instability thresholds will significantly exceed a nticipated operating currents [11]. Study of the FEL/RF interaction suggests that instability in the IR Demo, and thus similarly in the IR Upgrade, is ma naged by feedb ack mechanisms in the RF drive sy stem [12]. 5 PROJECT STATUS US Navy funding of 9.3 M$ has commenced. A pr e- liminary machine design has been generated and has gone into engineering. Full funding of construction is e x- pected in 2001, with beam operations st arting in 2002. 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by the U. S. Dept. of Energy under contract number DE -AC05 -84ER40150. REFERENCES [1] D. Douglas for the Jefferson Lab IR Demonstration FEL Project Team, “The Jefferson Lab 1 kW IR FEL”, these proc eedings. [2] C. C. Shih, et al., Nuc. Inst. Meth. A304:788 (1991). [3] D. Engwall et al., PAC’97, pp. 2693 -5, Vancouver, May 1997. [4] T. Siggins et al., “Performance of the Photocathode Gun for the TJNAF FEL”, FEL’2000, Durham, N.C., August 2000. [5] J. R. Delayen et al., PAC’99, pp. 934 -6, New York, 29 March -2 April 1999. [6] J. Flanz et al., Nuc. Inst. Meth. A241:325 -33 (1985). [7] D. Douglas, op. cit. [8] B. Yunn, work in progress. [9] L. Merminga and B. Yunn, “Electron Beam Colle c- tive Effects in the J efferson Lab 10 kW IRFEL”, FEL’2000, Durham, N.C., August 2000. [10] R. Li, PAC’99, pp. 118 -22, New York, 29 March -2 April 1999; R. Li, these procee dings. [11] L. Merminga et al., PAC’99, pp. 1180 -2, New York, 29 March -2 April 1999. [12] L. Merminga et al. , “FEL -RF Instabilities in Recirc u- lating, Energy -Recovering Linacs with an FEL”, FEL’99, Hamburg, August 1999.

arXiv:physics/0008033v1 [physics.acc-ph] 10 Aug 2000Results of anRF Pulsed Heating Experiment atSLAC∗ D.P. Pritzkau andR. H.Siemann, Stanford LinearAccelerato rCenter, Stanford, CA, 94309,USA Abstract ResultsarereportedfromanexperimentonRFpulsedheat- ing of copper at SLAC. Damage in the form of cracks may be induced on the surface after the application of many pulses of RF. The experiment consists of two circu- larly cylindrical cavities operated in the TE 011mode at a resonant frequency of 11.424GHz. Each cavity received 8.5MW, 1.2 µs pulses at 60Hz corresponding to a calcu- latedtemperatureriseof120Konthecoppersurface. After 5.5×107pulses, the experiment was stopped and the cop- persurfaceswereexamined. Damageispresentonthearea ofthe surfacewherethemaxiumumheatingoccurred. 1 INTRODUCTION RF pulsed heating is a process by which a metal is heated from magnetic fields on its surface due to high-power pulsed RF. Since the heating occurs over a short time, the inertia of the material prevents expansion and thermal stresses are induced. If these stresses are larger than the elastic limit, known as the yield strength, then damage in the form of microcracks on the surface may occur after many pulses. This type of damage is known as cyclic fa- tigue. Forfully-annealedOFEcopper,weexpectthisdam- agetooccurabovetemperaturerisesof40K[1]. However, this expectation is based on a static yield strength. It may bemoreappropriatetouseadynamicyieldstrengthtopre- dictthedamagethreshold,whichmaybetwotothreetimes higher[2, 3]. This experiment to study RF pulsed heating on copper consists of circularly cylindrical cavities operating in t he TE011mode at a resonant frequency of 11.424GHz. The dimensions of the cavities were chosen to maximize the heating on the endcapswhich are the test pieces of the ex- periment and were designed to be removable. For more detailssee [4,5,6]. 2 PARAMETERS OFEXPERIMENT 2.1 Endcappreparation Two cavities were connectedto a 50MW X-bandklystron through a magic-tee in order to protect the klystron from reflected power. Four endcaps are tested at one time with thissetup. Theendcapsareapproximately22mminradius and made of OFE copper. They are cut to a class-16 fin- ish andthen brazedontostainless-steel ringsso theycould be weldedontostainless-steel pistonsthat areinsertedin to the cavities. Before welding, the endcaps are diamond ∗Work supported by Department of Energy Contract DE-AC03- 76SF00515fly-cut to a mirror-finish and cleaned for vacuum with a light chemical etch. The damage from pulsed heating de- pends on the material and on surface preparation, and the chemicaletchmayhavehadsignificantinfluenceonthere- sultsofthe experiment[7]. 2.2 Cavityparameters The unloadedand external cavity Q’s were measured with a networkanalyzerbeforeand after the experiment. These valuesarelisted inTable1. The diagnostic TE 012mode operating at 17.8GHz was not used in this experimental run [4, 5, 6] because inter- ference with other modes prevented measurements of dy- namictemperatureriseandQchange. Thisproblemshould beresolvedforthenextrun. 3 RESULTS Each cavity received 1.2 µs, 8.5MW square pulses from the klystron. The surface magnetic field at the endcaps is radial with a J1variation along the radius. The maximum field and temperature rise occur at a radius of 10.6mm. Thecalculatedmaximumtemperatureriseonthesurfaceis 120K based on measurement of the input power. For de- tails about this calculation see [4, 5]. The experiment was runfor5.5 ×107pulsesatthistemperaturerise. Aftercom- pletion, final measurements of the cavity Q’s were taken and are listed in Table 1. The endcaps were then removed andexamined. RF breakdown occured at the coupling irises and ini- tially limited the input power to 8.5MW. Although the cavityeventuallyprocessed,weelectedtoremainatatem- perature rise of 120K to simplify the accounting of the pulses. After the end of the experiment, we discovered the couplingirises were melted on the inside of the cavity. Since the holes became effectively larger, the coupling to the TE 011modewas increased. This explainsthe reduction in theexternalQ’s. In Figure 1, one can see a visible change in the crys- talgrainsintheregionapproximately10.4mmto11.0mm from the center with an average width of approximately 4 mm to 5mm. From GdifdL [8] simulations, the fields in the region closer to the coupling iris is 5% higher than the fieldsdiametricallyoppositeofthisregion. Thissimulati on wouldthenexplainwhythereismoredamageintheregion closer to the aperture, since the region farther away has a temperatureriseapproximately10%lower. Several other effects that are not critical to the central goal of measuring damage from pulsed heating were also observed. Initial examinations have shown that copper sputtered onto the endcaps from the coupling irises. TheTable 1: CavityQ’s forTE 011mode Cavity# Theoretical Initial Final Initial Final Q0Measured Q 0Measured Q 0MeasuredQ extMeasuredQ ext 1 21890 20350 14360 12315 7690 2 21890 20610 16810 12220 7140 Figure 1: One of the copper endcaps. The other endcaps are similarinappearance. densityofthecopperglobulesincreasesclosertotheplane of the couplingirises. One may also see darkcirclesalong the area of maximum magnetic field. Since they seem to occur in pairs and the magnetic field in this area is radial, webelievethesepatchesareduetomultipacting. However, it is not yet understood why this occurs since the electric field inthisregioniszero. The endcaps were examined with a scanning electron microscopeusingsecondaryemissionanda5 keVelectron beam. Figure2showsaregionwheremaximumdamageis expected. Note that this endcap pictured is different from the one shown in Figure 1; however, all four endcaps are similar in appearance. The little bumps along the surface are the copper globules sputtered from breakdown at the couplingiris. Moreimportantly,one caneasily see the nu- merous cracks that have occured on the surface. For com- parison,aregionatthecenterwherethetemperatureriseis closetozeroisshowninFigure3. Thispicturewastakenat the samemagnification. Therearenocracksin thisregion. The copper globules are also noticeable here. Because of the sputtering, we cannot isolate the unloaded Q degrada- tionshowninTable1duetosputteringfromthatduetothe presenceofthecracks. Eachendcapwasscannedalongarandomdiameter. The scansshowthatcracksareonlyevidentintheregionofvisi- blegrainsinFigure1wheremaximumdamageisexpected. Highermagnificationimagesofthe regionsof crackswere Figure 2: Region (0.9mm ×0.9mm) where maximum damageis expected. Thescale inthe upperright-handcor- neris100.7 µm. Figure4hashighermagnificationimages oftheindicatedregions. Figure 3: Center of endcap. The scale in the upper left- handcorneris100.7 µm. taken. Forthe endcapshownin Figure2,the averageloca- tionofallhigher-magnificationimagesofcracksisapprox- imately10.4mmfromthe centerwith astandarddeviation of 1.3mm. Close-up shots of a few of these cracks are showninFigure4. An internal cross-section of the endcap shown in Figure1 was completed. Not as manycrackswere evident inthecross-section,buttheydidoccurintheregionofmax- imum temperature rise. One interesting crack is shown in Figure5. Itbeginsatthesurfaceandpropagatesdowntoan internal grain boundary. Afterwards, the crack propagates alongthegrainboundary.Figure 4: Regions 1–3 from Figure 2. The scale shown in eachimageis10.0 µm. 4 CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that RF pulsed heating with a tem- peratureriseof120KposesadangertoOFEcopperstruc- tures. Theevidenceisthesurfacemodificationanddamage shown in Figures1,2,4and5. We have measured degra- dation of the cavity Q 0also. Because of copper sputtered from breakdown at the coupling iris, it is not conclusive that thisdegradationwascausedbythe surfacedamage. We are preparing one more experiment with OFE cop- Figure 5: A cross-sectionof the endcapshown in Figure 1 showing an internal crack in the region of maximum tem- perature rise. The crack extends 24 µm into the surface beforetouchingthe grainboundary. per. Theprincipleimprovementwill beuseofthediagnos- tic TE 012modeto measuretemperaturerise andchangeof cavity Q during the RF pulse. This will also allow mea- surement of the evolution of Q 0during the course of the experiment. RF pulsed heating is a limit to accelerator performance, and additional experiments need to be done for differ- ent temperature rises, pulse counts, materials and surface preparation. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Gordon Bowden for his helpwiththedesignofthetestcavities. Theauthorswould also like to thank Al Menegat for his assistance with run- ningtheexperiment. 6 REFERENCES [1] H.M. Musal, Jr., “Thermomechanical Stress Degradation of MetalMirrorSurfacesUnderPulsedLaserIrradiation”,Las er Induced Damage inOpticalMaterials 1979, pp. 159–173. [2] V.F.Kovalenko, PhysicsofHeatTransferandElectrovacuum Devices, ch.7, Moscow: Sovetskoe Radio, 1975. InRussian. [3] O.A. Nezhevenko, “On the Limitations of Accelerating Gr a- dient inLinear CollidersDue tothePulse Heating”,PAC’97, Vancouver, Canada, May 1997. [4] D.P. Pritzkau, et al., “Experimental Study of Pulsed Hea ting of Electromagnetic Cabities”, PAC’97, Vancouver, Canada, May 1997. [5] D.P.Pritzkau, et al.,“Possible High Power Limitations From RF Pulsed Heating”, 4th RF Workshop (RF98), Watsonville, California,October 1998. SLAC-PUB-8013. [6] D.P. Pritzkau, et al., “Experimental Design to Study RF PulsedHeating”, PAC’99,New York, March 1999. [7] Prof.Reinhold Dauskardt, private communication, 2000 . [8] Warner Bruns, GdfidL v1.2 , 2000.

arXiv:physics/0008034v1 [physics.acc-ph] 11 Aug 2000Energy stabilizationof1.5 GeVS-Band linac M.Kuriki,H.Hayano, T.Naito,T. Okugi,KEK,Tsukuba,Japan V. Vogel,BINP, Moscow,Russia Abstract KEK-ATFisstudyinglowemittance,multi-bunchelectron beam for the future linear collider. The energy instability of the 1.5 GeV linac has been a problemmaking the beam injection to the dampingring unstable. Because the unsta- ble beam generates also large amount of the radiation, the beamcurrentis limitedbytheKEK radiationsafetypolicy much lower than what we expect. Stabilizing the S-band linac is therefore important not only to improve the beam quality, but also to clear the radiation safety limit to star t the multi-bunchoperation. We have made various modifications to solve the prob- lem on the electron gun, modulator, klystron etc. For the modulator, we have developed a feed-forward controlled De-Q module. This module compensates the voltage jitter by controlling the deQ timing with a feed-forward circuit because the amount of the excessive charge up is strongly correlated to the charge up slope that can be measured prior to the deQ timing. The energy stability was exam- inedandwasimprovedbyafactorof3,from0.6%to0.2% of itself. Modification for the feed-forward circuit to get more stability was made. The test for the new circuit is in progress. For the long term instability, phase-lock system for klystron RF is being installed. In the test operation, it showedagoodperformanceandcompensatethephasedrift less than 1◦. 1 INTRODUCTION KEK-ATFisatestfacilitytostudythelowemittancemulti- bunch beam and beam instrumentation technique for the future linear collider. That consists from 1.5 GeV S-band linac,abeamtransportline,adampingring,andadiagnos- tic extractionline. In the linac, the electron beam is generated by a thermionic electron gun. Typical intensity is 1010elec- tron/bunch. Thebunchlengthshrinksfrom1nsto10psby passingacoupleofsub-harmonicbunchers,aTWbuncher. The electron beam is accelerated up to 1.3 GeV by 8 of the S-band regular accelerating section. One section has twoacceleratingstructuresdrivenbyaklystron-modulato r. KlystronisToshibaE3712generating80MWwithapulse duration of 4.5µsRF. A peak power of 400 MW with a pulse duration of 1.0µsis obtained by SLED cavity and makesa highgradientacceleratingfield,30MeV/m. 20 of bunches separated by 2.8 ns are accelerated by one RF pulse. This multi-bunch method is one of the key technique in the linear collider, but ATF is now operated in single-bunchmodebecause of the KEK radiationsafety policy. In April 2000, we achieved horizontal emittance 1.3×10−9rad.m,verticalemittance 1.7×10−11rad.m(bothfor 2.0×109electron/bunch , single bunch mode )[1] which arealmost ourtarget. So, our next task is to achieve such low emittance with the high intensity, high reputation multi-bunch electron beam. To start the multi-bunchoperation,we have to clear the radiationsafetylimit anyhow. One of the biggest source of the radiation is the beam transport line. The large energy tail and the energy jitter causestheradiationlossinthebeamtransportline. Tosup- press the radiation , we have to stabilize the beam energy andalso improvethe qualityofthebeam. In addition, the energy jitter fluctuates the injection ef- ficiency to the damping ring, the beam intensity becomes therefore very unstable. The energy stabilization of the linac is very important for the systematic study for the beaminstrumentationat theextractionline. 2 FEED-FORWARDDEQ Fromastudyoftheenergyinstability[2],oneofthebiggest sourceoftheinstabilitywasklystronvoltagejitterinduc ed by the fluctuated modulator output. We implement a new deQmethodto compensateit. In our modulator, the pulse forming network, PFN is charged up resonatorly up to 43 kV. By discharging PFN, a pulse transformer gains this voltage up to 340 kV with pulsedurationof7.5 µsandis fedto theklystron. EpfndVdt 0.7850.790.7950.8 0.805 0.8055 0.806 0.8065 Figure 1: x and y axe show EPFNand dV/dt respectively. EvendeQ works, EPFNcorrelateswith dV/dt. deQ module controls the voltage of PFN, EPFN. When EPFNreaches the reference voltage, deQ modules fires trigger to stop the charge up. Fig. 1 shows the correla- tion between EPFNand gradient of the charge up curve, dV/dt. Ideally EPFNis independent from dV/dt, but there is a significant correlation. This correlation is ex- plained as follows; there is some delay to stop charging up and the delay causes excessive charge up which is ex- pressedas (dV/dt )×δtwhere δtisthe delay. Thisexcessis therefore proportional to dV/dt and induces the correla- tion. If dV/dt was alwayssame, it was not a problem. In fact, theamplitudeofACpowerisunstableandthatmakesfluc- tuated dV/dt. Improving the quality of power source is straightforward, but it will be rather expensive. Then we admit the fluctuation of dV/dt and consider to compensate theEPFNjitter. Epfn in LPF Ref D/AComparator Gate Voltage control delay (128 s - 250ns)µFF off FF on Diff. circuitGain 10dB-30dB SHGain 20dB-40dB + -A/D 15ms0-5msDelay 5msDelay Trig. inOut Figure 2: Block diagram of the feed-forward controlled deQ. Upper and lower parts are the conventional deQ and feed-forwardcircuitrespectively. Because dV/dt is fluctuated and δtcould not be zero, then the only way to compensate the fluctuation is to con- trolδtto keepa constantexcessivechargeup. Fortunately, we can measure dV/dt prior to fire deQ signal, then feed- forwardcontrolispossible. Table 1: Stability of EPFNwith and without feed-forward control. The data are shown in % of RMS divided by the mean. mod.#0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 off.031 .089 .107 .106 .015 .064 .071 .097 .033 on.011 .036 .070 .070 .014 .029 .045 .036 .009 Fig. 2 shows block diagram of feed-forward deQ con- troller. Upper part shows that for the conventional deQ circuit. Lower part shows the feed-forward circuit. dV/dt is obtained by a differential circuit. Difference signal of dV/dt and the reference is used to determine the delay of deQ signal by using a voltage control delay. Gain of the amplifiers are optimized to make EPFNindependent from dV/dt. dV/dt EPFNa) under gainb) over gain c) optimized Figure 3: Schematic dV/dt−EPFNplots for three cases; a) undergain,b)overgain,andc)optimized. Fig. 3 schematically shows EPFN-dV/dt correlation in three cases: a) under gain, b) over gain, and c) opti- mized. By looking such plot, we optimized the gain of feed-forwardcircuitfor9modulators.Table 1 shows the stability of EPFNwith and without feed-forwardcontrol. The unit is σEPFN/EPFN. Except for modulator #4, there was significant improvement for the stabilityuptofactorof3. (%)(ADC count) 108001100011200 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Figure 4: x and y axe show the momentum jitter, ∆P/P andamplitudeofAC200Vlinerespectively. Fig. 4 shows the correlation between momentum jitter, ∆P/Pand amplitude of AC 200V line. Momentum jitter was measured in beam transport line where the dispersion functionwaslarge. Thedispersionfunctionwascalculated by a software for beam dynamics, so called SAD imple- mentedby KEK scientists. Blue andred(orlight anddark) areas show data taken without and with feed-forwardcon- trol respectively. In this plot, we can see a clear depen- denceofmomentumtotheamplitude,butitiscompensated by feed-forwarddeQ. The momentumjitter was decreased from0.6%to 0.2%peak-to-peak. Fig. 5 shows EPFN−dV/dtcurve with feed-forward control. This strange shape can be explained as follows; although the feed-forward control should be driven by dV/dt measured at the end of the charge up curve ( cotθ), dV/dt is actually measured at the middle of the charge up curve( cotθ′). The gain for dV/dt, Gis therefore adjusted likecotθ= G cot θ′andG cotθ′is used instead of cotθ. Due to the sine shapeof the chargeup curve,the gain Gis EpfndV/dt 0.6150.620.6250.630.635 0.626 0.627 0.628 0.629 0.63 Figure 5: x and y axe show EPFNand dV/dt respectively. Data were taken with fully optimized feed-forward con- trolleddeQ. a function of deQ timing. Because deQ timing changesaccording to dV/dt, then Gis a function of dV/dt. On the other hand, Gis a constant in our circuit. As a re- sult,wheredV/dtislarge(small), Gistoolarge(small)and feed-forwardcontrolbecomesover(under)gain. To fix the problem, the gain have to be changedaccord- ing to input signal (dV/dt). By introducing a linearizer to the feed-forward circuit, the gain can be changed con- tinuously as a function of input signal. A modified feed- forward circuit was implemented with three linearizers. Thetest isnowinprogress. 3 PHASE-LOCK SYSTEM Because the experimental hall where ATF is placed does not have a good thermal condition, the klystron gallery temperature is drifted ∼1◦Cin one day. RF phase is also drifted 3−5◦ofS-bandfrequency. To stop the RF phase drift, we have introduced a phase lock system. The block diagramof the system is shown in Fig. 6. RF reference distributed through an optical line is 2 8 5 6 M H z R e f e r e n c e f r o m M a s t e r O s c i l l a t o r R F A m p .O / E C o n v e r t o r P h a s e C o n t r o l l e r A m p l i t u d e C o n t r o l l e rI n p u tO u t p u t I n p u tO u t p u t P h a s e S h i f t e r I n p u tO u t p u t C o n t r o l I n P h a s e S h i f t e r I n p u tO u t p u t C o n t r o l I nR e f . I nP h a s e O u t T e s t I n P h a s e D e t e c t o r R F A m p . I n p u tO u t p u t C o n t r o l I nF . B . I nC o n t r o l O u tF e e d b a c k M o d u l e K l y s t r o nF e e d b a c k S y s t e m f o r K E K - A T F K l y s t r o n F e e d b a c k M o d u l e R CL o o p G a i n 0 - 6 0 d B T i m e C o n s t a n t 0 . 4 - 1 , 3 7 5 m s e cF . B . I n C o n t r o l O u tP o l a r i t y C h a n g e Figure 6: Block diagram of the phase lock system for the klystron. separated into two lines after the phase shifter. One is for the reference of the phase detector which observes phase drift at the klystron output. Another is for klystron input through anotherphase shifter controlled by the phase-lock system to absorb klystron phase drift. Feed-back module gainsthephasedetectoroutputandcutsthehighfrequency componenttopreventoscillationofthefeed-backloop. Thephase-detectorisdevelopedbyNihon-koshuhaorig- inally for KEKB RF system. For ourpurpose,it was mod- ified for pulsed RF by adding sample hold circuit. In this module, phase is measured by taking ExOR of two inputs gainedbylimiteramplifiers. Duetothislogic,outputphase isindependentfrominputRFamplitude. Table2showsthe specifications. Fig. 7 showsa result of a test forthe phase-locksystem. KlystronRFphasewasstabilizedwithin 0.2◦peak-to-peak bythephase-locksystemwiththeamountofthefeed-back up to6◦. Accounting for 1◦systematic error, the klystron RF phasewas stabilized within 1◦. Thephase-locksystemTable 2: Spec. of the phase detector ( resolution was ob- tainedat reference0dBm,test −15∼0dBm) item spec. frequency 2856±5MHz inputpulse duration 300ns∼C.W. referencedynamicrange −30∼+5dBm test dynamicrange −10∼+5dBm phasedetectablescope 540◦ phaseresolution ±1◦ -10-8-6-4-202 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Result of Feedback for Klystron PhasePhase [degrees] Time [hours]Klyston Out Phase Amount of Feedback Figure7: Stabilizedklystronphaseandfeed-backamount. will be introducedfor all klystrons soon. This system will suppressthelongrangeenergydriftoftheS-bandlinac. 4 SUMMARY TosuppresstheenergyinstabilityoftheS-bandlinac,feed - forwardcontroldeQwasintroduced. Themomentumjitter wasmeasuredatthebeamtransportlineandwasimproved from 0.6% to 0.2% by the feed-forward deQ. For further improvement,thefeed-forwardcircuitwasmodifiedtocor- rect the curve shape of dV/dt- EPFNrelation by using lin- earizers. For the long term phase drift of klystron RF, a phase- lock system was examined and stabilized the RF phase within 1◦. The phase-lock system will be introduced for all klystronssoon. 5 REFERENCES [1] http://lcdev.kek.jp/ATF/ [2] H. Hayano et al. , ’Klystron RF stabilization using feed- forward circuit’, 19th International linac conference at Chicago, 1998

2.856-GHz MODULATION OF CONVENTIONAL TRIODE ELECTRON GUN S. J. Park, J. S. Oh, J. S. Bak, M. H. Cho, W. Namkung, PAL/POSTECH, Pohang, S. Korea Abstract For the generation of picosecond (< 100 ps) giga-hertz electron beam pulses, we suggest the RF modulation ofthe conventional triode electron gun. The feasibility ofthis scheme has been experimentally studied bymodulating the triode gun (with the Y- 824 cathode-grid (KG) structure provided by the CPI Eimac) with 2.856-GHz pulsed RF’s generated by a solid-state amplifier(SSA). In this paper, we present the methods and resultsof this investigation. 1 INTRODUCTION Triode electron guns are used as the sources for linear colliders and storage ring injectors. The essentialcomponent of the triode gun is the cathode-grid (KG)structure whose inter-electrode spacing is very short(/Gaeb0.17 mm). The short inter-electrode spacing combined with the use of a high-voltage (HV) nanosecond pulserhas made it possible to generate single or multiplenanosecond electron beam pulses from the gun[1][2].Refer to Fig. 1 for the schematic diagram of theconventional triode gun. Figure 1: Schematic diagram of conventional triode gun. Generation of picosecond pulses from the conventional triode gun has not been practical because of the largecapacitance (~25 pF) of the KG structure and theunavailability of picosecond HV pulsers. In order toovercome these, RF modulation of the KG structure issuggested. The advantage of this scheme becomesapparent when it is used as the electron source of a RFlinac. If the triode gun is modulated at the same RFfrequency as the accelerating structure, the bunchingsystem which includes the pre-buncher and the bunchercan be removed. This will greatly simplify the beginningpart of the linac. Furthermore long-pulse (over several tens of microseconds) operation is possible which isbeneficial for FEL experiments and industrial accelerators. R. J. Becker et al. have modulated their triode gun by 1 GHz RF to obtain high-frequency long-pulse trains for theFELIX[3]. In order to analyze the RF modulationcharacteristics, they represented their KG structure as asimple resistance. This becomes inaccurate as the RFfrequency increases because the impedance of the KGstructure becomes a combination of resistance, inductance,and capacitance. In order to evaluate the required RFpower at the frequency of 2.856 GHz, a simple semi-analytic calculation of the RF modulation has beenperformed[4]. We have sliced the electron beam startingfrom the cathode into a number of disks and solved theequation of motion for them with different initial RFphases. From this calculation, it was found that RF powerof about 100 W was required to be coupled to the KGstructure for the peak beam current of ~1 A at themodulation frequency of 2.856 GHz. 2 EXPERIMENT 2.1 Zero-Beam-Voltage Test In order to study the feasibility of the scheme, an experimental set-up has been prepared. In this set-up, noHV is applied between the KG structure and the anode.We tried to obtain the envelope of the modulated pulsetrain by measuring the current flowing out of the cathode.Refer to Fig. 2 for the schematic diagram of theexperimental set-up. Figure 2: Schematic diagram of experimental set-up (zero- beam-voltage test) for the 2.856-GHz modulation of the conventional triode gun. 2856-MHz sinusoidal signal is fed into the SSA and amplified in a pulsed form. The pulsed RF power is thenattenuated to a required level and measured by a crystaldetector attached to directional couplers. Impedancematching is done by a coaxial 3-stub tuner. A specialtaper was fabricated to connect the Y-824 socket structureto the standard N-type connector. For feeding of heatercurrent to the innermost heater socket, a cable should runacross the inner and outer conductors of the taper. Thispoint is located as close as to the Y-824 at which thevoltage standing wave minimum is located. Bias voltage(between the cathode and the grid) is provided through abias tee. Insertion loss of the transmission line (excludingthe taper and 3-stub tuner) was about 2.4 dB. The cathodecurrent, I K, flowing from the cathode, was measured by an oscilloscope with 50-ohm input. An 1- µF capacitor is inserted to block out DC bias. The I K was measured and plotted with varying heater voltage (V h), bias voltage (V b), and peak RF power (P rf). The results are summarized in Fig. 3. Figure 3: Result of I K measurement with varying V h, V b, and P rf Figure 4: Typical cathode current and RF powers waveforms Fig. 3(a) shows that the cathode current, I K saturates by the space-charge effect. Fig. 3(b) and 3(c) shows thedependencies of the I K on the V b and the P rf. Cathode current and RF power waveforms are shown in Fig. 4.2.2 High-Voltage Test As the next step, HV was applied between the grid of the KG sructure and the anode. For this a HV deck wasinstalled and all the instruments and components wereplace on it. See Fig. 5 for the schematic diagram of theset-up. Figure 5: Set-up for the high-voltage test of the 2.856- GHz modulation of conventional triode gun. The waveform of electron beam pulses were measured by the use of a coaxial pick-up. A N-type coaxialfeedthrough was mounted on a 2.75 ″ CF flange. An Aluminium button was attached to the center conductor ofthe coaxial feedthrough. (see Fig. 6) Figure 6: Coaxial pick-up for measuring the electron beam pulse waveform. The pick-up is meant only to measure the time structure of the electron beam pulses. Absolute measurement of thetotal charge is not the purpose. The capacitance of thebutton as measured by the TDR (Time DomainReflectometry) technique was about 4 pF. Electrical pulsesignals from the coaxial pick-up were measured using a20-GHz sampling oscilloscope (Tektronix 11801B withSD-24 sampling head). A 56-ns delay line (Model 5056,Picosecond Pulse Labs.) was used to delay the pulsesignals before entering the sampling oscilloscope. Thedelay line also provides trigger signals at –6 dB of thepulse signals. The bandwidth of all cables and connectorswere ~20 GHz. In Fig. 7, we show the measured electron beam pulse waveforms together with the input RF waveforms forcomparison. Experimental conditions at the time of themeasurement are as follows: 1. Acceleration HV = 50 kV, 2. Peak Input RF Power = 500 W, 3. RF Pulsewidth = 0.9 µs, 4. RF Pulse Repetition Frequency = 30 Hz, 5. Bias (Cathode-Grid) Voltage = 0 VDC. Figure 7: 2.856-GHz modulated electron beam pulse waveforms (a), and input RF waveforms (b). Top andbottom waveforms are macro and micro pulsesrespectively. The period of the measured waveform was 350 ps corresponding to the RF frequency of 2.856 GHz. Theshape of the waveform was almost sinusoidal withnegative offset. This is thought to be due to the limitedresponse speed of the coaxial pick-up. Since thecapacitance of the pick-up was 4 pF, the RC time of it is50 ohms x 4 pF = 200 ps. This is too long to measure 100-ps pulses. Measured peak pulse current was about 10 mA.This is not total current because the pick-up buttonintercepts only a part of the total charge. Based on ourexperiences of nanosecond pulse measurement with thesame coaxial pick-up, rough estimation of the true pulsecurrent is obtained by multiplying a factor of 10. Thus thetrue peak pulse current could be roughly estimated to be100 mA. 3 SUMMARY AND FURTHER WORK The feasibility of the 2.856-GHz modulation of the conventional triode electron gun has been investigatedexperimentally. We summarize the results as follows: 1. Test with zero beam voltage showed that the cathode current in the KG structure under the2.856- GHz RF modulation exhibited usualspace-charge saturation behaviour.Furthermore, the dependencies of the cathodecurrent on the bias voltage and the RF powerwere as expected. 2. We have generated and measured 2.856-GHz modulated electron beam pulses. The period ofthe measured pulse waveform was 350 pscorresponding to the RF modulation frequency of 2.856 GHz. The peak pulse current wasroughly ~ 100 mA. 3. The feasibility of the 2.856-GHz modulation of conventional triode gun has been demonstrated. With these achievements, further work should include the followings: 1. Improvement of the response time of the coaxial pick-up. 2. Measurement of pulse waveform with varying operation parameters. 3. Increase of peak beam current up to 1 A. In order to improve the response time of the coaxial pick- up we are trying to reduce the capacitance of the beam-collecting button below 2 pF. With this, it may bepossible to measure 100-ps or less electron beam pulses.In order to increase the beam current, one may adopt acoaxial resonant cavity which is loaded by the KGstructure. With this, RF losses in the transmission linescould be minimized and the efficient coupling of the RFpower to the KG structure would be achieved. REFERENCES [1] R. F. Koontz, “One Nanosecond Pulsed Electron Gun System,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. Vol. 26, No.3, pp.4129-4130 (1979). [2] R. Chaput, “Electron Gun for the FEL CLIO,” Proc. of the 1990 Eupean Particle Accelerator Conference,Nice, France, pp. 544-546. [3] R. J. Becker et al., “1-GHz modulation of a high- current electron gun”, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A 307, pp543-551 (1991). [4] S. J. Park et al., “Proposal of Direct 2.856-GHz Modulation of PLS Electron Gun,” Oral PosterPresented at the RF96 Workshop, 1996, ShonanVillage Center, Japan.

arXiv:physics/0008036v1 [physics.acc-ph] 11 Aug 2000ExperimentalDetermination ofthe Characteristicsof a Pos itronSource Using Channeling∗. R.Chehab, R.Cizeron, C.Sylvia(LAL-IN2P3, Orsay,France) V.Baier, K.Beloborodov,A.Bukin, S.Burdin, T.Dimova,A.D rozdetsky,V.Druzhinin,M.Dubrovin†, V.Golubev,S.Serednyakov,V.Shary,V.Strakhovenko(BINP , Novosibirsk,Russia) X.Artru,M.Chevallier,D.Dauvergne,R.Kirsch, Ph.Lautes se,J-C.Poizat, J.Remillieux(IPNL-IN2P3, Villeurbanne,France) A.Jejcic(LMD-Universite,Paris, France) P.Keppler, J.Major(Max-Planck Institute,Stuttgart,Ger many) L.Gatignon(CERN, Geneva,Switzerland) G.Bochek, V.Kulibaba,N.Maslov(KIPT, Kharkov,Ukraine) A.Bogdanov,A.Potylitsin,I.Vnukov(NPI-TPU, Tomsk,Russ ia) Abstract Numerical simulations and ‘proof of principle’ experi- ments showed clearly the interest of using crystals as pho- tongeneratorsdedicatedtointensepositronsourcesforli n- ear colliders. An experimental investigation, using a 10 GeV secondaryelectronbeam,oftheSPS-CERN, imping- ing on an axially oriented thick tungsten crystal, has been preparedandoperatedbetweenMayandAugust2000. After a short recall on the main features of positron sources using channeling in oriented crystals, the experi- mental set-up is described. A particular emphasis is put on the positron detector made of a drift chamber, partially immersed in a magneticfield. The enhancementin photon and positron production in the aligned crystal have been observed in the energy range 5 to 40 GeV, for the incident electrons, in crystals of 4 and 8 mm as in an hybridtarget. The first results concerning this experiment are presented hereafter. 1 INTRODUCTION Theenhancementofradiationobserved,inchannelingcon- ditions, in a crystal with respect to bremsstrahlung, makes crystal targets interesting for obtaining large positron yields: the high rate of photons generated along a crystal axis produces a corresponding high positron yield in the same crystal target [1]. Association of crystals, where in- tense radiation takes place and amorphous targets, where photons are materialized in e+e- pairs, have also been in- vestigated[2]. The insertionof this kind of targetin a typ- ical scheme for a positron facility of a linear collider has also been considered [3]. The high current of the incident electron beam on the target leading to important energy deposition in the target and to possible crystal damages, mainlycausedbyCoulombscatteringoftheelectronbeam on the nuclei, these two aspects have been studied. Sim- ulations of warm crystals, heated by the energy deposited, ∗Research madein the framework of INTASContract 97-562 †presently at WayneState University atCornell, Ithaca NY,U SAwere provided in actual working conditionsusing the JLC (Japanese Linear Collider) conditions [3]. Concerning the radiation damages, a beam test has been performed with the SLC beam; fluences as high as 2·1018mm−2, corre- spondingto hundredhoursof continuousworkingof a lin- ear collider as JLC, appeared harmless [4]. Proof of prin- ciple experiments(1992-93,Orsay) [5] and (1996, Tokyo) [6] showed photon and positron yields enhancements. An experimentalverificationoftheyield,energyspectrumand transverse emittance of a crystal positron source should givedefiniteanswersontheuseablepositronyieldforaLC (LinearCollider)[7]. Abeamtestonthetransferlinesofth e SPS-CERN started this spring. After a description of the experimental set-up, with some emphasis on the positron detector,thefirst resultsareprovided. 2 THE EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP The experiment is using multi-GeV electron beams of the SPS. The electrons, after passing through profile monitors and counters (trigger) impinge on the targets with ener- gies from 5 to 40 GeV (mainly at 10 GeV). Photons, as well as e+e- pairs are produced in the target. These parti- clescomemainlyintheforwarddirectionandtravelacross the magnetic spectrometer, consisting of the drift chamber andpositroncountersinsertedbetweenthepolesofaspec- trometermagnet(MBPS). Themost energeticphotonsand chargedparticlescomeoutnearlyin theforwarddirection. The charged ones are swept by a second magnet (MBPL) after which the photonsreach the photondetector made of preshowersandacalorimeter(see figure1). 3 THEMAIN ELEMENTS OF THE SET-UP The beam: the SPS bursts are made of 3.2 seconds dura- tion pulseswith a 14.4secondsperiod. 104electrons/burst areusuallyobtainedat10GeV electronenergy. The trigger: the channeling condition requires that/0/0/1/1/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1 coincidence andanticoincindence/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1 counters MBPL/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1preshower MBPS/0/0 /1/1 /0/0 /1/1/0 /1 /0/0/1/1/0 /1 /0 /1/0 /1/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1 /0 /1/0/0 /1/1 /0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1 /0 /1 /0/0/1/1 /0/0/1/1/0/0/1/1 /0/0/1/1/0 /1 /0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1 /0/0 /1/1/0/0 /1/1 /0 /1/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/0/0/1/1 /0/0 /1/1/0 /1/0/0/1/1 /0/0 /1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 magnets/0 /1/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1 /0/0 /1/1/0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1 /0/0 /1/1 /0/0/0/0/1/1/1/1/0/0 /1/1 /0/0/1/1/0/0 /1/1/0/0 /1/1/0 /1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1B /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1 e− goniometercrystal inB/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1DC counters /0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1Photon detector e− Figure1: Experimentalset-up the incident electron direction angle, with respect to the crystal axis, be smaller than the Lindhard critical angle, Ψc=/radicalbig 2·U/Ewhere Urepresentsthepotentialwellof an atomic row andE the incident electronenergy. In order to fulfilitwe installedatriggersystemmadeofscintillato r counters. For 10 GeV and <111>axis for the tungsten crystal, Ψc= 0.45mrad. Takingintoaccountthepresence of crystal effects at angles slightly larger than the critic al angle,theacceptanceangleforthetriggerhasbeenchosen at0.75mrad. That gives typically a rate of ”good events” in theexperimentalconditionsof1%. The target: two kindsof tungsten targets have been in- stalled on a 0.001 degree precision goniometer: a 8 mm thick tungsten crystal and an hybrid target made of 4 mm crystaland4mmamorphous. Mosaicspreadsofbothcrys- tals arelessthan 0.5mrad. The positron detector: the drift chamber is made of hexagonal cells, filled with a gas mixture He(90%) CH4(10%)andpresentstwo parts: the first part (DC1) , with a cell radius of 0.9 cm, is escaping mainly the magnetic field of the bending magnet MBPS. It allows the measurement of the position and exit angleoftheemittedpairs. the second part (DC2) , with a cell radius of 1.6 cm, is submittedtothe magneticfield. It allowsthe measurement of the positron momentum. Two values of the magnetic field are used, 1 and 4 kGauss, to investigate the two momenta regions: from 5 to 20MeV/cand from 20 to 80MeV/c. Signalandfieldwiresareshort(6cm)andmadeofgold plated tungsten and titanium, respectively. Counters(sci n- tillators) are put on the lateral walls in order to define the useful region. The drift chamber exhibits 21 layers and the resolution is of 300 microns. The maximum horizon- tal angle being accepted is 30 degrees. The limited verti- cal size sets the overall acceptance of the chamber to 6%. The choice of Helium providesa small multiple scattering (0.001X0). The electronics: for drift time measurements the elec- tronicsdetectsthe leadingedgeofthe signal,comingfrom the sense wire, and digitize the time with 3ns resolution. Front end electronics is made of preamplifier, shaper and ECL discriminator. The TDC (Time to Digital Converter) havea scale rangeof1.5microseconds. Acommonstopis used.The photon detector: Photon multiplicity is rather high: about 200 photons/event for a 8 mm thick tungsten crystalorientedalongits <111>axis. Theangularaccep- tance of the photon detector is 5.5 mrad (half cone angle). That gives 2000 triggered photons in an SPS burst. The photondetectorismadeof: 2 preshowers giving the relative photon multiplicity (one with nominal 5.5 mrad acceptance and the other with re- duced1.5mradacceptance), a NaI calorimeter providing the energy radiated. The role of the photondetector is essential for operating the crysta l orientation. 4 FIRSTRESULTS degree<amplitude> 0102030405060 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Figure 2: Rocking curve measured on preshower for the hybridtarget. Enhancement in photon production. On the <111> axis of the tungsten crystals, the ultrarelativistic elect rons radiatemorephotonsthanbyclassicalbremsstrahlung. The preshower provides the relative photon multiplicity with respect to the crystal orientation. We reported, on fig- ure 2, the associated rocking curve for the 8 mm hybrid B=1kGsB=4kGs degree<amplitude> 024681012141618 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Figure 3: Rocking curves measured on DC counter 1 for the hybridtargetwithtwo valuesofthemagneticfield.degree<number> 01020304050607080 1 2 3 4 Figure4: Rockingcurvemeasuredwithnumberofwiresin DC forthehybridtarget. target,foranincidentenergyof10GeV.Theenhancement is about1.8. Enhancement in positron production. A correspond- ing enhancement in positron production is observed in channeling conditions as can be seen on figure 3. Rock- ing curves for the positrons use the informations from the two countersput on the lateral walls of the Drift Chamber. Counter 1 is receiving low energy positrons strongly de- flected by the magneticfield (1 and 4 kGauss) and counter 2,the highenergypositrons(andthe electrons)weaklyde- flected. Itcanbeseenthattheratioaligned/randomisabout 2, for an incidentenergyof 10GeV, in agreementwith the simulations(Counter1). Theenhancementinpositronpro- duction has also been observed with the number of hitted wiresinthe DriftChamber(seefigure4). X, cmY, cm -10010203040506070 -300 -280 -260 -240 -220 -200 Figure5: Typicaleventforthehybridtarget. Field 0.4T Positron tracks. Positron tracks, for different running conditions(Beamenergy,crystalthickness,magneticfield ) have been reconstructed. We present on figure 5 an exam- pleofthesetracksreconstructedseparatelyinthetwopart s of the chamberon the basis of the signals deliveredby the Drift Chamber. Momentum distribution. Preliminary momentum dis-Momentum, MeV/cEvents 0102030405060 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Figure 6: Positron momentum distribution measured by DC with hybrid target. Field 1 kGauss. Incident energy is 10 GeV. The unfilled histogram represent the oriented crystal,darkone— thetargetin randomposition. tributionhasbeendeterminedfortheacceptedpositronsin the Drift Chamber (see for example figure 6). Such dis- tribution has also been obtained for the two values of the magnetic field: 1 and 4 kGauss for several energies (from 5 GeVto40GeV). Incident energy dependence. Variation of the incident energy from 5 to 40 GeV, clearly shows enhancement in photon as in positron production with growing energy; At 40GeV, theratioaxis/randomismorethan4. 5 SUMMARYAND CONCLUSIONS These first results on positron production in channeling conditions with high energy electrons clearly show an en- hancement in photon as in positron production in agree- ment with the simulations. For the positrons the enhance- ment takes place mainly at low energy. This aspect is of particular importancefor the positron capturein the accel - erator channel. The Drift Chamber operates properly to determine the positron track and, hence to providethe exit angle and positron momentum. These first results, which give a clear confirmationfor the interest of using this kind ofsourceswillbecompletedbyanappropriatedanalysisin the nextmonths. 6 REFERENCES [1] X.Artruet al.Nucl.Instr.Methods A344 (1994) 443 [2] X.Artruet al.Nucl.Instr.Methods B119 (1996) 246 [3] X.Artruet al.ParticleAccelerators Vol.59 (1998) 19 [4] R.Chehab et al. Proceedings of the 1999 EPAC, Stockholm, June 1999 and LAL-RT98-02 [5] R.Chehab et al. Proceedings of the 1993 PAC, Washington DC,May 1993 andLAL-RT93-05 [6] B.N.Kalininet alNucl.Instr.Methods B145 (1998) 209 [7] V.N.Baieret alNucl.Instr.Methods B 145(1998) 221

arXiv:physics/0008037 11 Aug 2000ELLIPTICAL X-RAY SPOT MEASUREMENT Roger A. Richardson, Stephen Sampayan, John Weir, LLNL, Livermore, CA, USA Abstract The so-called roll bar measurement uses a heavy metal material, optically thick to x-rays, to form a shadow of the x-ray origination spot. This spot is where an energetic electron beam interacts with a high Z target. The material (the “roll bar”) is slightly curved to avoid alignment problems. The roll bar is constructed and positioned so that the x-rays are shadowed in the horizontal and vertical directions, so information is obtained in two dimensions. If a beam profile is assumed (or measured by other means), the equivalent x-ray spot size can be calculated from the x-ray shadow cast by the roll bar. Thus the ellipticity of the beam can be calculated, assuming the ellipse of the x-ray spot is aligned with the roll bar. The data is recorded using a scintillator and gated camera. Data will be presented from measurements using the ETA II induction LINAC. The accuracy of the measurement is checked using small elliptical targets. 1 INTRODUCTION This paper describes a “rollbar” diagnostic used to determine the spot size of a pulsed x-ray source. The innovation described here is a rollbar in two dimensions, so that the beam ellipticity (with respect to the rollbar axis) and center can be measured. A gated camera is used so that a time history of the spot size can be generated using multiple shots or cameras. 2 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP The diagnostic is basically the same as described in reference 1. A thick block of Tungsten alloy metal is used to image a x-ray spot generated by the focused beam of the ETA II LINAC [2]. The edge of the block has a large (1 meter) radius (“rolled”) so that alignment is not critical. The modification described in this paper is that two edges of the rollbar (perpendicular to the line of sight) are radiused, so that the spot size can be determined in two dimensions and the horizontal & vertical components of the beam can be measured. A fit to the data gives the spot size and position of the x-ray spot in these directions. The shadow of the x-ray spot is projected onto a scintillator (1 cm Bicron BC-400), which is then imaged using an intensified gated camera. The cameras used to take the data were a Cohu SIT tube, with a typically 10ns gate, and/or the DiCAM Pro camera from Cooke, with a 5 ns gate.The advantage of a rollbar measurement over a true 2D measurement (such as a pinhole) is that the signal can be averaged in one dimension, and photon statistics are vastly improved. These image lineouts are typically fitted to an integrated gaussian function (erfc) to obtain the spot size. The spot size is defined as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the gaussian. Alternatively the lineouts can be fitted to a double gaussian, or the FFT can be done. To measure the resolution of the diagnostic, the rollbar was placed adjacent to the scintillator, which gave a measured edge blur (using an erfc fit) of 2.7 mm. At the radiographic magnification of 4 used to take this data, this gives a resolution of 0.67 mm. The magnification is the ratio of the distances from the rollbar to the scintillator and from the rollbar to the spot. A sequence of four accelerator shots with identical settings were used to estimate a 7% error in the measured RMS (root mean square) spot size, and a 14% error in the ratio of horizontal/vertical (ellipticity). This measurement is the basis for the error bars on the plots in this paper. 3 DATA 3.1 Elliptical targets The accelerator beam is typically focused on a flat, 5 mil tantalum target to produce x-rays detected by this diagnostic. To check the accuracy of this measurement, a target was constructed that consisted of small tantalum buttons, which were glued onto a thin sheet of Mylar. The targets were small (on the order of the spot size of the beam), elliptical in shape, 1 x 1.5 mm, and oriented to align with the rollbar axis (“horizontal” and “vertical”). A successful shot is shown in Fig. 1, which is a 10 ns gated image, centered temporally in the middle of the pulse. The data is somewhat noisy because the outer part of the beam missed the target and created noise x-rays. Gaussian fits of the image lineouts in the horizontal and vertical directions gives a measured spot size of 1.1 x 1.6 mm, which compares well with the target size and shape, especially considering the minimum resolution of ~0.7 mm Figure 1: Two-dimensional rollbar image. 3.2 Quadrapole magnet variation A quadrapole magnet in the beamline of the accelerator was varied to adjust the beam ellipticity. This produced an elliptical x-ray spot size as illustrated in Fig. 2. The electron beam leaves a witness hole in the tantalum disk after a shot. These holes were elliptical in shape during this data series, and the measured ellipticity of the holes linearly increased with the quadrapole current, Fig. 3. The hole shapes also confirmed the direction of the long axis of the ellipse (horizontal). In general, the witness holes do not give an accurate measurement of spot size, however in this case they did correlate well with the ellipticity. 1.61.822.22.42.62.8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6vertical horizontalSpot Size, mm Quadrapole Current, Amp Figure 2: Spot size variation due to quadrapole magnet current. 0.811.21.41.61.8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6X-Ray Spot Hole sizeEllipticity Quadrapole Current, Amp Figure 3: Spot size ellipticity compared to target hole shape. 3.3 Tuning curve The final focus of the accelerator is minimized by adjusting the final magnet and plotting the spot size as determined by the rollbar. A typical tuning curve is shown in Fig. 4. In this tune, the beam is almost round at the spot size minimum, and become elliptical as the spot size increases. 11.522.53 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940vertical horizontal rmsSpot Size, mm Focus Magnet, Amp Figure 4: Accelerator tuning curve. 3.4 X-Ray spot vs. time By changing the delay of the gated camera, a time history of the spot size can be constructed with multiple shots. A typical data series is shown in figure 4. This illustrates the beam degradation during the rise and fall of the pulse due to energy variations in the beam. 0123456 -20 020 40 60 80 100 120Vertical Horizontal RMSSpot size, mm Time, ns Figure 5: X-Ray spot size vs. time. 3.5 Beam motion The x-ray spot center can also be calculated from the data and plotted. Figure 5 shows some data taken using a gas cell for the final focus [3]. This experiment used a small cell filled with nitrogen gas to focus the beam without using a magnet. The electron beam ionizes the gas in the cell, and the resulting plasma neutralizes the space charge of the beam, causing the beam to pinch due to self-magnetic forces. Because the focusing magnet is turned off, the beam now has freedom of motion on the target and moves during the shot. -1-0.500.511.5 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 00.2 0.4 0.6Vertical, mm Horizontal, mm-15 ns +15 ns +5 ns-5 ns Figure 6: Spot centroid motion. Data points are 10 ns apart, labeled with respect to middle of pulse. 4 SUMMARY The two dimensional rollbar technique gives an accurate measurement of the spot size in two dimensions (in the rollbar orientation). The data can be analyzed to give the x-ray spot ellipticity and centroid. It is a valuable diagnostic for tuning a radiographic accelerator and studying beam-target interactions. REFERENCES [1]Richardson, R. A., “Optical Diagnostics on ETA II For X-ray Spot Size”, Proceedings of the PAC’99, New York, NY, (1999). [2]S.Sampayan, et. al. “Beam-Target Interaction Experiments For Bremsstrahlung Converters Applications”, Proceedings of the LINAC2000, Monterey, CA, (2000). [3]To be published. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.

HIGH -INTENSITY SINGLE -BUNCH ELECTRON BEAM GENERATION WITH THE 38 MeV L -BAND LINAC IN OSAKA UNIVERSITY S. Okuda, T. Yamamoto , S. Suemine, G. Isoyama, ISIR, Osaka University, 8 -1Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567 -0047, Japan Abstract The characteristics of t he single -bunch electron beam of the 38 MeV L -band electron linac at the Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research in Osaka University were investigated. Recently, the injector of the linac was improved to increase the peak beam current for injection. The maximum charge of electrons in a bunch of the accelerated beam was 91 nC at an energy of 27 MeV. The energy spread was 0.8-2.5% FWHM. The bunch lengths measured with a streak camera were 20- 30 ps. The normalized rms emittance of the beam was 140 πmm mrad at a charge of 63 nC/bunch. The possibility for obtaining beams at higher charges and the applications of the beams to generating high -power radiation are discussed. 1 INTRODUCTION The 38 MeV L -band electron linac (1300 MHz) at the Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research (ISIR) in Osaka University was constructed in 1978 for generating the high -intensity single -bunch beams. After the improvement of a subharmonic -prebuncher (SHPB) system the charge of electrons in the beam increased to 67 nC/bunch in maximum [1]. The main application researches using the linac are the analyses of the ultra -fast phenomena induced by the irradiation with the beam in a short period and the generation of high -power radiation from the beams such as the self -amplified spontaneous emission with a wiggler [2 ] and the coherent synchrotron or transition radiation [3]. In order to increase the electron charge in the beam a newly developed high -current electron gun was installed in the linac and the locations of the m agnetic lenses were optimised , which improved the characteristics of the beams for injection. High-intensity beams at charges up to 100 nC/bunch were generated at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) for the development of a wakefield accelerator [4]. They used a photo -cathode gun system In the present work the characteristics of the single - bunch beams of the linac in which the new injector system was installed, were investigated. 2 COMPONENTS OF THE IS IR LINAC The components of the ISIR linac is schemati cally shown in Fig. 1. A thermionic triode gun [5] has been newly developed for the linac. The cathode -grid assembly YU-156 (EIMAC) is installed in the gun . The area of the cathode is 3.0 cm2. The grid pulser of the gun has been developed by using an avalanche -type pulser. A pulsed electron beam is injected from the gun at a pulse width of 5 ns FWHM. The maximum peak beam current is 30 A at an anode voltage of 100 kV . By using the gun the quality and the pulse characteristics of the beam for injecti on have been much improved. According to the results for the calculation of the trajectory of the electron beam from the gun, the locations of the two magnetic lenses between the gun and the first SHPB have been optimised . The linac is equipped with three SHPBs (two at an rf frequency of 108 MHz and one at 216 MHz). The SHPB has a coaxial single -gap cavity. Pulsed rf at 20 µs 108 MHz 20 kW rf source108 MHz 20 kW rf source216 MHz 20 kW rf sourceElectron gunMagnetic lensesGrid pulser1.3 GHz 5 MW rf source1.3 GHz 20 MW rf source Bunchers Accelerating waveguideElectron beam12th SHPBs6th SHPB 108 MHz 20 kW rf source108 MHz 20 kW rf source216 MHz 20 kW rf sourceElectron gunMagnetic lensesGrid pulser1.3 GHz 5 MW rf source1.3 GHz 20 MW rf source Bunchers Accelerating waveguideElectron beam12th SHPBs6th SHPB Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the L -band linac at ISIR. duration is supplied to the SHPB by three 20 kW rf amplifiers independently. To generate a single -bunch beam the maximum pulse le ngth of the electron beam injected from the gun to the first SHPB is 5 ns. Two bunchers are driven by a 5 MW L -band klystron. An accelerating -waveguide 3 m long is driven by a 20 MW L-band klystron. The lengths of the rf pulse on the flattop for the kly strons are 3.2 and 3.9 µs, respectively. The maximum beam energy is 38 MeV for no beam loading. The detailes of the rf components are described in ref. 6. While the accelerator system is optimized to generate the single -bunch beam, multibunch beams having a macropulse length of 5 ns to 2 µs are also generated under the different operational conditions of the SHPBs. The beams are being applied to a variety of basic researches. 3 EXPERIMENTAL The present experiments were performed at an energy of 27 MeV. The energy spect rum of the electron beam was measured with an energy analyser composed of a bending magnet and a Faraday cup. In the measurements the energy resolution was about 0.1%. The operational conditions of the linac components were determined as to obtain the sm allest energy spread. The charge of electrons in the beam was measured by using an Al block as a beam dump, placed at an output window in the air atmosphere. The influence of the secondary electrons emitted from the block was negligible. The error in t he measurement was estimated to be below 5%. The emittance of the electron beam was measured with a method using quadrupole magnets and a beam profile monitor. The values of rms emittance obtained for the vertical and the horizontal directions were avera ged. A time profile of the single -bunch beam was measured with a streak camera. In the measurement the Cherenkov light emitted from the beam passing in air was observed. The time resolution in the measurement was 3 ps. 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSI ON Figure 2 shows the energy spectrum of the single - bunch beams measured at a charge of 22 nC/bunch. This has a typical shape of the spectrum. The shape is determined by the electric field in the cavities, which depends on the rf phase, the beam loading on rf a nd the wakefield induced by the electron bunch. Figure 3 shows the electron charge dependence of the energy spread. The maximum charge of the single -bunch beam observed in the present experiments is 91 nC/bunch. The energy spread is approximately 1% FWH M at charges below about 40 nC, and at the higher charges increases with the charge. In the previous work the spectrum narrowing due to the wakefield in the waveguide was observed at charges of about 30 nC [7]. This is not obvious in Fig. 3. Figure 4 sh ows the charge dependence of the normalized rms emittance which was obtained by being 00.20.40.60.811.2 222324252627282930 Energy of Electrons (MeV)Relative Current of Electrons Figure 2: Typical energy spectrum of the single - bunch beam at an electron charge of 22 nC/bunch. 012345 0 20 40 60 80 100 Charge of Electrons (nC/bunch)Energy Spread (% FWHM) Figure 3: Electron charge dependence of the energy spread of the sing le-bunch beam. 0100200300 0 20 40 60 80 100 Charge of Electrons in a Bunch (nC)Normalized Emittance (ƒÎmm¥mrad) Figure 4: Electron charge dependence of the normalized rms emittance of the single -bunch beam, given by being averaged for vertical and horizontal dire ctions. averaged for vertical and horizontal directions. The emittance for two directions well agreed. While the number of data is limited, the value of emittance seems to be independent on the charge and is 100 -150 πmmmrad. These values are considerably low compared to those at ANL. This is attributed to the difference in the injector system. The typical time profile of the electron bunch measured with a streak camera is sh own in Fig. 5. The electron charge is 73 nC/bunch. In the present experiments the bunch length is 20 -30 ps in FWHM. In most cases the bunch shows a triangular shape. By using a chicane -type bunch compressor the effective compression of the bunch has be en observed [8]. In this work an extremely high electron charge in the beam was obtained at considerably low emittance. For the further increase of the charge the grid pulser of the gun is being improved to make the pulse shape of the beam from the gun ne arly rectangular. The single -bunch beam beams are being used for exciting matter strongly and for obtaining high -intensity radiation. The radiation is now being applied as a new far-infrared light sources. The present results show the possibility for o btaining light sources at the higher intensity and also for applying radiation to developing a new method for high -gradient acceleration of charged particles. 5 CONCLUSIONS The characteristics of the accelerated beams were improved by the installation of the new injector system in the ISIR linac. Extremely high intensity single-bunch beams were obtained at relatively good beam qualities. The maximum charge of electrons was 91 nC/bunch at an energy of 27 MeV with bunch lengths of 20-30 ps FWHM. The charg e will increase by improving the pulse characteristics of the grid pulser of the gun. The high-power radiation will be applied to new research fields. ACKNOWLEGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Dr. T. Kozawa, Mr. Igo and Dr. R. Kato for the techni cal help in measuring the bunch shape and the beam emittance. REFERENCES [1] S. Takeda, K. Tsumori, N. Kimura, T. Yamamoto, T. Hori, T. Sawai, J. Ohkuma, S. Takamuku, T. Okada, K. Hayashi and M. Kawanishi, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS -32 (1985) 3219 [2] R. Kato, R.A.V. Kumar, T. Okita, S. Kondo, T. Igo, T. Konishi, S. Okuda, S. Suemine and G. Isoyama , Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A445 (2000) 164. [3] S. Okuda, M. Nakamura, K . Yokoyama, R . Kato and. Takahashi , Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A445 (2000) 267. [4] M. E. Conde, W. Gai, R. Konecny, X. Li, J. Power, P. Schoessow and N. Barov, Phys. Rev. ST -AB 1 (1998) 04132 -1. [5] S. Okuda, T. Yamamoto, S. Suemine and S. Tagawa, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A417 (1998) 210. [6] S. Okuda, Y. Honda, N. Kimura, J. Ohkuma, T. Yamamoto, S. Suemine, T. Okada, S. Takeda, K. Tsumori and T. Hori, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A358 (1995) 248. [7] S. Takeda, N. Kimura, K. Tsumori, M. Kawanishi and T. Shintake, Proc. 5th Symp. Accel. Sci. and Technol. (Tshukuba, Japan, 1984) 80. [8] M. Nakamura, S. Okuda, M. Takanaka, R. Kato, T. Takahashi and S. Nam (submitted to Nucl. Instr. and Meth.). -0.200.20.40.60.811.2 0 50 100 150 200 Time (ps)Relative Intensity Figure 5: Time profile of the single -bunch beam measured with a streak camera at an electron charge of 73 nC/bunch.

arXiv:physics/0008039v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 12 Aug 2000THE EFFECTS OF THE ROTATION IN PLASMA S. N. Arteha Space Research Institute, Profsoyuznaya 84/ 32, Moscow 117 810, Russia Abstract The electric and magnetic self-fields can exist in the rotati ng plasma. The self-sustained rotation can be established in the plasm a. The disturbed distribution function of rotating plasma is derived from th e Vlasov equation. The propagation of waves in rotating plasma differs from that in the usual plasma. New terms of the Landau damping appear. The local rot ational behaviour may become prevailing. 1 INTRODUCTION Phenomena dealt with are not too rare. However, the causes of the phenomena (forces, fields) are rather weak and can often be supposed to b e negligible. It is well known that many astronomical and laboratory objec ts represent rotating plasma. Therefore, the study of rotating plasma is of great theoretical and practical interest. It is assumed that plasma is neutral on the average. However, electric and magnetic fields can exist in plasma, because there are forces which oppose the electric one1,2. It is well known that in a wide variety of plasma devices plasm a travels across the magnetic field at rates much higher than those expl ained by collisional processes. It has been assumed that the electron transport a cross the magnetic field arises from the /vectorE×/vectorBdrift (/vectorE×/vectorBinstability3). The radial electric field exists to balance out the /vector v×/vectorBand centrifugal force terms4. The plane sheet stability of a surface charge has been consid ered for externally applied and mutually perpendicular fields ( /vectorE⊥/vectorB) which produce an equilibrium particle flow in the sheet5. The calculation was extended to a cylindrical shell in the inhomogeneous magnetic field6(the size of a shell is identical to the particle gyro-orbit). The equilibrium properties induce a self-electric field for a charge slab or a cylinder (the fluid approximation7,8). The effect of equilibrium radial electric field on the trapped - particle stability has been investigated9. The stabilization can result from the configuration 1in which the radial potential assumes a hollow profile (the eq uilibrium radial electric field points inward). The theory also predicts the p ossibility of additional instability, when the /vectorE×/vectorBrotation is present (the rotationally driven trapped - particle mode). The development of a radial electric field Eρdue to toroidal rotation has been studied for the toroidal geometry10. The ion distribution function becomes Maxwellian with temperature uniform on the magnetic surfac e. The poloidal flow decays. The density is distributed over magnetic flux surfac es by the Boltzmann factor with the effective potential energy that is the sum of a centrifugal potential and an electrostatic potential required for charge neutral ity. The usual small gyroradius expansion of the Fokker-Planck equation was car ried out, and it was shown, that the effects of centrifugal and Coriolis forces on the particle motion affect the transport. The rotational equilibrium in cylindrical, non-neutral pl asma with an axial magnetic field has been analysed in detail11. The poloidal rotation of plasma due to the /vectorE×/vectorBdrift has been studied in tokamaks (the so-called H−mode of improved confinement) with a radial elec- tric field and strong axial magnetic field. The /vectorE×/vectorBdrift rotates the plasma poloidally (when the radial electric field exists). In non- H-mode plasmas the poloidal rotation frequency is typically much less than the toroidal rotation fre- quency in tokamaks. The toroidal geometry of tokamaks becom es important in some theories of poloidal spin-up12. The poloidal rotation instability (resulting from the poloidally asymmetric diffusion) leads to poloidal velocity shears which may quell the microturbulence. The nonlinear interplay bet ween the poloidal spin-up and turbulence-driven anomalous transport leads t o bifurcated equilib- ria (theLtoHtransition mode in tokamaks). The tokamaks can spontaneous ly develop a poloidal velocity shear (the ”P-S” flows). The spin -up persists even under conditions where the growth rate is sonic13. The rotation is well known to induce new poles in the perturbe d distribution function. The so-called resonant diochotron instability14,15involves the Landau damping at the resonant frequency ω=IΩ (Iis an integer, Ω is the rotation frequency). The role of Landau damping in cross-field electr on beams and in an inviscid shear flow has been considered for the cylindrical g eometry (perturba- tions with kz= 0) with unperturbed angular velocity ω0(r) =1 2n0,0≤r < b andω0(r) =1 2n0(b/r)2,b < r ≤a(n0is a constant). A formal analysis of the resonance has been given in the Laplace transforms context14. The case of a perfectly conducting wall (at the impedance Z(ω) = 0) was studied, and a slight shift in the eigenfrequencies from their locations for an in ducedZ(ω)/ne}ationslash= 0 was found. The Landau damping can overcome the resistive destab ilization (if there exist gradients in the electron density) for a strictly decr easing electron density in a cylindrical system, so that only one resistively unstab le normal mode can exist - the fundamental one. The diochotron instability of a thin (r2−r1 r1≪1), tenuous ( ωp≪ωBe), cylin- 2drical layer (a single-component plasma) has been investig ated in a strong uni- form constant magnetic field using the Vlasov equation15. The particle gyro- radius was of the order of the mean radius of a layer. The theor etical model does resemble the geometry of some experiments which rely on the h igh energy parti- cles injection. Two distribution functions were considere d, which give the same density (ρ(r)∼[Θ(/vector r−/vector r1)−Θ(/vector r−/vector r2)], where Θ is the Heaviside step function), but are different in the velocity space (the velocity spread i s zero, or the parti- cles oscillate around the mean radius). The self-electric fi eld of the equilibrium density (which is strictly radial) was included in the treat ment (but not the self- magnetic field). The stability against electrostatic pertu rbations with frequency around −lωBe(wherelis the asimuthal wave number of perturbations) and the infinite wavelength in the z-direction has been investigated. The perturbed distribution function was found, and the macroscopic shear ed flow was shown to be not a relevant criterion for instability by itself. The gyrokinetic integral equations, used for studying the i on temperature gradient (ITG)- driven mode in a toroidal geometry at low pla sma pressure, have been extended to include the equilibrium ion sheared flo ws16. The parallel and perpendicular sheared flows are destabilizing and stabi lizing mechanisms, respectively. The gyrokinetic integral code was used to exp lore the sheared flows’ effects on the ITG mode in a sheared slab geometry17. The mode structure and eigenfrequencies predicted by the integral code differ from the results derived by the differential approach (for higher radial eigenmodes). The further development of the above mentioned works and som e new ideas are presented in this work. The purposes of the paper are: 1) to show the separation of charges and to obtain rigorous ex pressions for electric and magnetic self-fields in rotating plasma; 2) to demonstrate the self-sustained rotation origin; 3) to derive the perturbed distribution function and to find t he location of poles (the terms in the Landau damping); 4) to propose the local-rotational description of plasma. The consideration is self-consistent in its character (fro m the first principles) and leans upon the microscopic properties of a matter, rathe r than upon the con- tinuous medium (fluid) models. The description can be applie d to free rotating plasma objects (astronomical, for example) with some arbit rary shape and com- position, to plasma devices with cylindrical symmetry in pa rticular (the arbitrary geometry is included as the limits of integration only). The peculiarities, which differentiate this work from the ci ted papers, are as follows: - Not only the radial electric self-field Eρ(ρ,z), but the magnetic self-field Bz(ρ,z) and smaller self-fields Ez(ρ,z) andBρ(ρ,z) are taken into consideration (note that all these components are functions not only of ρbut ofzas well). This consid- eration is necessary, since the behaviour of particles chan ges qualitatively: the solution depends not only on the small ratiov c, but on arbitrary ratio of character- 3istic velocities as well. All quantities (density, charge d ensity, local composition, etc.) are not externally given but can be evaluated in a self- consistent manner. - The possibility of a steady-state rotation of plasma is sho wn. The self-sustained rotation of initially neutral plasma origins in the externa l magnetic field /vectorB0as a consequence of the /vectorE×/vectorBdrift (/vectorEis the self-field). - The perturbed distribution function is found (rigorously ) proceeding from the Vlasov equation. The approach differs in carrying through th e extra terms due tokz, a self-consistent radial centrifugal force, the self-fiel ds and in allowing the wave amplitudes to be space-dependent. - The new poles are shown to exist, and the location of these po les is found (the new terms in the Landau damping appear). Since the wave propa gation in ro- tating plasma (an accelerated medium) differs from that in or dinary plasma, the local-rotational description of plasma is supposed to be po ssible (in the strong turbulence case, for example). 2 THE ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS IN ROTATING PLASMA Rotating plasma possesses some peculiarities as compared t o rotating objects which consist of neutral particles. We start with the rigid r otation for a simple explanation only (the substitutions for an arbitrary rotat ion are given below). The existence of the centrifugal force /vectorF=mΩ2/vector ρ, (1) (where/vectorΩ is the angular frequency of the system, mis the particle mass, /vector ρis its distance from the axis of rotation) causes different effec ts on particles of different masses. As a result of these different effects, the ρ-dependence of particle concentration is bound to be different for particles of differ ent masses. According to the Boltzmann distribution, nα=n0αexp/parenleftBigg −Uα kT/parenrightBigg , (2) whereTis the system temperature, kis the Boltzmann constant, n0αis the particle concentration on the axis of rotation, Uαis the potential energy of α- sort particles. In the case of neutral particles Uα=−mαΩ2ρ2 2. (3) Thenα(ρ) dependences for hydrogen plasma are shown schematically i n Fig.1. HereR0is the size of a system (the distance from the axis of rotation ); symbol αis eitherH(hydrogen) or e(electron). 46 - 0nα ρR0 R′ 1ni ne FIG.1. The dependences nα(ρ).:::::::::::: ::::: However, plasma consists of charged particles. Since the pa rticles of differ- ent masses in plasma have different charges, this partial sep aration of particles produces a partial separation of charges. The negatively ch arged region is bound to lie near the axis of rotation, whereas the positively char ged region lies near the system boundary ( R0). The electric field /vectorE0(ρ,z) (in the polar coordinate system: the /vectorΩ direction is the z direction) exists as a result of charge se paration. This field opposes the considerable separation of charges. As illustrated in Fig.1, there is some distance from the axis of rotation R′ 1(z), where the local charge equals zero. For 0 ≤ρ <R′ 1(z) the plasma is negatively charged on the average; for R′ 1(z)<ρ≤R0the plasma is positively charged. The partial separation of charges gives rise to the ρ-dependence of charge density; that is, the plasma possessing the given charge den sity moves round a circle of definite radius. Therefore, circulating currents are inside the rotating plasma despite the fact, that all particles revolve with /vectorΩ on the average ( /vectorΩ has a distinct direction). For 0 <ρ<R′ 1the current is opposite to the plasma rotation direction (since the charge is negative), whereas for R′ 1< ρ≤R0the current flows in the direction of rotation (since the charge is positi ve). In the general case the magnetic actions of currents are not compensated, and th e magnetic field /vectorB exists. This is the magnetic field of a solenoid, whose axis co incides with the axis of system rotation. For rotating, fully ionized plasma (near macroscopic equil ibrium), which con- sists of elements with atomic number Ni, it follows in polar coordinates ρ,ϕ,z (z 5axis coincides with the /vectorΩ direction), that ne,nican be taken from (2) with Ue=−mΩ2ρ2 1 2+e/integraldisplayρ1 0E0ρ(ρ′,z1)dρ′+e/integraldisplayz1 0E0z(ρ1,z′)dz′+ /integraldisplayρ1 0eBz cΩρ′dρ′−/integraldisplayz1 0eBρ cΩρ1dz′, (4) Ui=−MΩ2ρ2 1 2−eNi/integraldisplayρ1 0E0ρ(ρ′,z1)dρ′−eNi/integraldisplayz1 0E0z(ρ1,z′)dz′− /integraldisplayρ1 0eBz cΩρ′dρ′+/integraldisplayz1 0eBρ cΩρ1dz′, (5) wherene(ρ,z) is the electron concentration, ni(ρ,z) is the ion concentration, −e is the electron charge ( e >0),mis the electron mass, Mis the ion mass, Te= Ti=Tare electron and ion temperatures, /vector ris the radius-vector: /vector r=ρ/vector eρ+z/vector ez. The quantities n0αcan be found from conditions:/integraltext (V)nαdv′=NαKα,where Kαis the total number of α-sort particles, Ne= 1 andKe=NiKi+ ∆, ∆ is the electron surplus (for non-neutral plasma ∆ /ne}ationslash= 0). The/vectorE0(ρ,z) components can be obtained from the system of integral equa - tions: E0ρ(ρ,z) =e/integraldisplay (V)q(ρ1,z1) R3 1ρ1[ρ−ρ1cos(ϕ1−ϕ)]dρ1dz1dϕ1, (6) where q(ρ1,z1) =n0iexp/parenleftBigg −1 kTUi/parenrightBigg −n0eexp/parenleftBigg −1 kTUe/parenrightBigg , (7) R1=/radicalBig (z−z1)2+ρ2+ρ2 1−2ρρ1cos(ϕ1−ϕ) E0z(ρ,z) =e/integraldisplay (V)q(ρ1,z1) R3 1(z−z1)ρ1dρ1dz1dϕ1, (8) Vis the system volume (its shape is arbitrary). RadiusR′ 1can be found from the equation ne(R′ 1) =ni(R′ 1) using (2), (4)-(8). It follows from the Biot-Savart law, that the magnetic field i s /vectorB=1 c/integraldisplay (V)[/vectorj1×/vectorR1] R3 1dv1, wherecis the speed of light, dv1is the region with currents, R1is the distance of this region to the point of observation, /vectorj1is the current density. The magnetic field due to rotation can be obtained from the fol lowing ex- pressions: Bρ=1 c/integraldisplay (V)jϕ(ρ1,z1) R3 1(z−z1)ρ1dρ1dz1dϕ1, (9) Bz=1 c/integraldisplay (V)jϕ(ρ1,z1) R3 1ρ1[ρ1cos(ϕ1−ϕ)−ρ]dρ1dz1dϕ1, (10) 6where jϕ(ρ1,z1) =eΩρ1q(ρ1,z1), (11) with substitutions q(ρ1,z1) from (7), Uαfrom (4), (5) and /vectorE0(ρ′,z′) from (6), (8); the magnetic field near the axis of rotation at the system boundary is Bz from (10) for z=L,ρ= 0, where 2 Lis the system size along the axis of rotation. The following substitutions need to be done for rotating pla sma of complex composition: jϕ→/summationtext ljl ϕ, n0α→nl 0α; in the case of unsteady rotation Ω2ρ2 2→/integraldisplayρ 0Ω(ρ′,z)ρ′dρ′. For astronomical objects the effects can be considerable; in this case the gravitational force plays important role. Note, that in the general case the field Eϕ/vector eϕexists for free rotating objects with some arbitrary (non-s ymmetric) shape. In this case all quantities depend on coordinate ϕas well. The additional terms e/integraldisplayϕ 0E0ϕρ1dϕ1,−eNi/integraldisplayϕ 0E0ϕρ1dϕ1 appear in (4) and (5), respectively. The component E0ϕis taken from E0ϕ(ρ,z,ϕ ) =e/integraldisplay (V)q(ρ1,z1,ϕ1) R3 1ρ2 1sin(ϕ−ϕ1)dρ1dz1dϕ1. 3 SOME APPROXIMATION OF THE DIELEC- TRIC CONSTANT TENSOR Now we obtain information about the electron part of the diel ectric constant tensorεαβ(the ion part can be found in a similar manner). The polarizat ion vector/vectorPis defined as ∂/vectorP ∂t=/vectorj ,/vectorP=/vectorP0+/vectorP′exp [i(/vectork/vector r−ωt)]. It follows that P′ α=εαβ−δαβ 4πE, β, (12) where −iω/vectorP′=−eKe/vector v,δαβis the Kroneker symbol. The expression for εαβin a rotating system can be derived directly from the equations of electron motion (the field/vectorEcontains the wave field /vectorE′∼e−iωt) with the force (exact) /vectorFe=−e/vectorE−e c[/vector v×/vectorB] +mΩ2ρ/vector eρ+ 2m[/vector v×/vectorΩ]−e cBzΩρ/vector eρ+e cΩρBρ/vector ez.(13) We suppose that the constant field /vectorBcontains all components ( B0ρ,B0ϕ,B0z) and/vector v∼e−iωt, i.e. space variations of /vectorE′are neglected. Resolving the equation 7/vector v=i/vectorFe/(mω) in terms of vρ,vϕ,vzand extracting the /vectorE′-dependence only (the constant polarization /vectorP0and the constant part ε(0) αβexist), one obtains εαα= 1−Ω2 e[ω2−(ωα Be)2] ω2[ω2−ω2 1], (14) where Ω e= (4πKee2/m)1/2,ω1=/radicalBig (ωρ Be)2+ (ωϕ Be)2+ (ωz Be)2, ωρ Be=eB0ρ/(mc), ωϕ Be=eB0ϕ/(mc) ,ωz Be=eB0z/(mc)−2Ω , εαβ=Ω2 e(ωα Beωβ Be+iωωγ Be) ω2[ω2−ω2 1], (15) hereα,βandγare taken from cyclic rearrangements in ρ,ϕ,z ;εαβ=ε∗ βα. The approach requires the following conditions: vT|kα|/ω≪1, v T|kβ|/ωα Be≪1,(the smallness of space /vectorE′-variations in the localization region of an electron), i.e. ωmust be large enough; and, besides, ωmust not be near the frequency ω1. It follows from the expressions (14), (15), that the dissipation equals zero: Q=iω 16π(ε∗ ik−εki)EiE∗ k= 0 (the tensor εαβis Hermitian). The εαβvalues determine the wave polarization (which is elliptic in the general case) for large ω. The gyration vector /vectorGcan be found from the equation Dα=εαβEβ+i[/vectorE×/vectorG]α, herei=√−1. In this approximation the components Gαare: Gα=Ω2 eωα Be ω[ω2−ω2 1], hereα=ρ,ϕ,z . We note in the general case, that the space dependences of fiel ds/vectorE,/vectorBand the wave amplitude need to be taken into consideration, in pr inciple (to obtain rigorous expressions for εαβor damping of waves, for example). One may sup- pose, that, as a consequence of space nonhomogeneity of all c haracteristics, the rotating plasma system as a whole can be more stable with resp ect to exter- nal disturbances (the system goes from resonance influences ). To impart some energy, the spectrum needs to be rather wide-range. 4 THE LOCATION OF POLES Since the rotating plasma is a nonhomogeneous accelerated m edium, the wave propagation has some peculiarities (damping, non-rectili nearness). In the general case the resonance conditions possess a relatively complex structure 8ψ(ρ,ϕ,z,/vectorB,/vectorE,/vector v) = 0. The derivation of the resonance conditions will be demo n- strated below in the context of the linear kinetic descripti on for some special cases. Note, that the elementary approach to the problem can be developed from the analysis of the exact force (13): it is necessary to fi nd such particles (/vector v(ρ,ϕ,z,t )), for which the work of the wave field A=/integraltext/vectorF/vector vdt is positive for some specific wave (in type, direction, polarization). The v alueAis A=/integraldisplay {−e(/vectorE/vector v) +mΩ2ρvρ+e cΩρ(Bρvz−Bzvρ)}dt. If the mean work is positive, the Landau damping mechanism ta kes place. In the kinetic description we start from the system of self-consis tent field equations: ∂fα ∂t+/vector vα∂fα ∂/vector r+/vectorFα∂fα ∂/vector p= 0, (16) rot/vectorE=−1 c∂/vectorB ∂t, div/vectorB= 0, rot/vectorB=1 c∂/vectorE ∂t+4π c/vectorj , div/vectorE= 4πq, q=e/integraldisplay (Nifi−fe)d3p ,/vectorj=e/integraldisplay (Nifi−fe)/vector vd3p, and separate the disturbed terms (caused by the wave propaga tion): fα=f0α+δfα,/vectorB=/vectorB0+/vectorB′,/vectorE=/vectorE0+/vectorE′, (17) whereαmeans either eori. It is believed that δfα,/vectorE′,/vectorB′∼A(ρ,z)expi(/vectork/vector r−ωt). (18) The undisturbed distribution function (in the rotating sys tem) takes the form: f0e=KeD (2πmT)3/2exp/bracketleftBigg −U′ 0 T/bracketrightBigg , (19) U′ 0=mv2 2+Ue, (20) whereKeis the total number of electrons in the volume V,Dis the normalization constant,Ueis taken from (4). The expression (19) is a solution of the kin etic equation (16) with the force (13). Ueis the potential part of electron energy (related with the force /vectorF). Note that the nonconservative force e/vector v×/vectorBis not appeared in the potential at all. All terms with /vectorBinclude the factor Ω and exist as a result of the system rotation only. We use the substituti ons /vectorE0=E0ρ(ρ,z)/vector eρ+E0z(ρ,z)/vector ez, 9and/vectork′=/vectork+S(/vector r)/vector r, where S(/vector r) =−i r2/parenleftBigg /vector r∂lnA(ρ,z) ∂/vector r/parenrightBigg . (21) Now we make some remarks. 1) The accounting of the amplitude space-dependence is equi valent to including some imaginary part in ω:ω→ω+iω′. For, the value ω′is greater than zero in the case of wave damping, and it follows from (18), (21), th at the appropriate wave amplitude A(ρ,z) is decreasing; the unstable case ω′<0 is analogous to wave amplitude increasing (see (18),(21)). The collisiona l damping can also be included in the term (21). The reverse problem can be formula ted: with the A(ρ,z) dependence known (using a probe wave), one should obtain in formation about collisional processes (the integral of collisions). However, it is not our intention to follow this way. 2) In the general case of unsteady rotation and gravitationa l force existence the following substitutions need to be done: E0ρ→E0ρ1=E0ρ−me egρ(ρ,z), E(1) 0z→E(1) 0z1=E(1) 0z−me egz(ρ,z), in (20): mΩ2ρ2 2T→m T/integraldisplayρ 0Ω2(ρ1,z)ρ1dρ1+m T/integraldisplay /vector g(ρ′z′)d/vector r′, where /vector g(ρ,z) =GM(ρ)/vector r r3, Gis the gravitational constant, M(ρ) is the mass in the 0 ≤ρ′≤ρregion; in(13): mΩ2ρ/vector eρ→mΩ2(ρ,z)ρ/vector eρ+m/vector g(ρ,z). The derivation of the disturbed distribution function is de monstrated in Ap- pendix. Of main interest here are the poles of δfe(they contribute to the Landau damping). As a consequence of different regimes of particles behaviour (see Appendix), the resonance conditions differ depending on the particles velocity. Fora <1 the term Q(ϕ−τ) does not have any pole in an explicit form (see (A8) in Appendix). The imaginary part of the dielectric cons tant tensor arises from the imaginary part of δfMand from the integration of the exponent18. We consider the case |a|≪1, i.e.v⊥is large enough: v⊥≫Ω2 1ρ ω(z) Be, v⊥≫ω(ρ) Bevz ω(z) Be. All terms (see (A8) in Appendix) can be expanded as a power ser ies ina. Inte- grating over the region τ→0 (which is most considerable for small |a|), one 10obtains δfe=Q(ϕ)/integraltext∞ 0exp{−iτY1}dτ, where Y1=A1 1 + sinϕ+ cosϕ+A1acos(ϕ+ϕ0) +d1+ 2D−(d1+D)asin(ϕ+ϕ0), i.e.δfe=−iQ(ϕ)/Y1. To find the location of poles, it is assumed, that S= 0; as a result, we have the resonance conditions: kzvz−ω−v⊥k⊥sin(ϕ+ϕ0+ϕ3+α) ω(z) Be= k⊥v2 ⊥{sin(ϕ3+α)−2cos(ϕ3+α)[1 + cosϕ+ sinϕ]} (1 + cosϕ+ sinϕ)/radicalBig Ω4 1ρ2+v2z(ω(ρ) Be)2. (22) Thus, the space-dependence of physical quantities leads to considerable change in the resonance conditions, except k⊥= 0 (for which the well known result follows:kzvz−ω= 0). Note, that the resonance conditions depend on the space variableρand angleα. Besides, the conditions (22) are nonlinear with respect tov⊥,ϕ,v z, i.e. in the general case two of these variables cannot be cho sen arbitrarily. Therefore, the resonance region decreases. In spite of the existence of poles in explicit form for |a|= 1 andb2= 1, the latter conditions are additional; therefore, the resonanc es don’t contribute to the Landau damping after integration in (A9) (see Appendix). Now we consider the case |a|>1. One can easily see from the structure of termQ(ϕ−τ), that there are the poles of the integrand at a>1 for ϕ−τ+ϕ0= arcsin( −1 a). (23) However, for the additional Landau damping the oscillation s of the exponent in (A8) (see Appendix) near these poles should be studied. For a>1 the oscillations do not increase for ϕ+ϕ0=−arcsin(1/a) andτ= 2nπ,n= 0,1,2,.... However, expanding Y(ϕ,τ) inτnearτ= 2nπforn= 1,2,..., one can see that the integration in the limits from −∞to +∞in (A8) gives zero. It follows for n= 0, thatδfe=Q(ϕ)/integraltext∞ 0exp{−iτY2}dτ, where Y2=A1 1 + sinϕ+ cosϕ+A1acos(ϕ+ϕ0) 1 +asin(ϕ+ϕ0)+D−(d1+D)cosϕ1√ a2−1(sin(ϕ+ϕ0) + sinϕ1). Therefore,δfe=−iQ(ϕ)/Y2. The third term in Y2is negligible near ϕ+ϕ0= −arcsin(1/a); the first term is also negligible, except ϕ=π,3π/2. We suppose S= 0 and, using the definition of ϕ1, obtain the resonance conditions: kzvz+k⊥v⊥sin(ϕ3+α+ϕ1)−ω= 0. Sinceϕis fixed, the resonance doesn’t contribute to the Landau damp ing. The expression for Y2can be used for finding approximate location of poles in the 11case of |a|≫1. The latter resonance gives the Landau damping. The resona nce conditions are: kzvz+k⊥v⊥sin(ϕ3+α−ϕ−ϕ0)−ω=−k⊥v⊥sin(α+ϕ3)sin(ϕ+ϕ0) 1 + cosϕ+ sinϕ.(24) We can see the transformation of the resonance conditions, w hich is a consequence of plasma motion and inhomogeneity. Note, that (24) gives ri se to the well known conditionkzvz−ω= 0 fork⊥= 0. Thus, in the general case there exist resonance particles (poles in δfe), which contribute to the Landau damping. We make some remarks on the local-rotational description of plasma. One can imagine that in a variety of cases the same system is compo sed of different subsystems. The question of the scale of averaging is not tri vial. Since plasma characteristics depend on the regime in it, it is clear that t he averaging over different local subsystems can lead to different results. Her e the question arises, what particular averaging is correct? It is possible that th is case just represents the local-rotational regime (since there is additional dam ping as waves propa- gate in an accelerated medium). The basic ideas of the descri ption consist in the following. Instead of using averaged plasma characteri stics for finding some physical quantity, we shall seek the quantity in a small rota ting subsystem with definite parameters (any plasma particles are involved in th e local rotational movements). The net result (the specific physical quantity u nder investigation in a plasma system as a whole) can be obtained by averaging the quantity over all possible directions of subsystem rotation. Actually, w e can imagine that the plasma (even though it is collisionless) consists of rotati ng parts with radius r∼rDand linear velocity v∼vm, whererDis the Debye radius 1 rD=/radicalBigg 4πe2 T/summationdisplay αKαN2α, (25) vmis the most probable velocity vm=/radicalBigg 2T m. (26) Therefore, the characteristic frequency of the local rotat ion is Ωl∼vm rD(27) (collisions produce local rotations with r≤l0 2, wherel0is the free path length). In the general case the solution (but not equations) for a phy sical quantity under study (transport coefficients, for example) should be a veraged over the sequence of local rotating ”cells”. For a ”cell” the kinetic equation takes the form (for electrons): ∂fe ∂t+/vector v∂fe ∂/vector r+ (−e/vectorE−e c[/vector v×/vectorB] + 2m[/vector v×/vectorΩl]− 12eΩlρ c[Bz/vector eρ−Bρ/vector ez] +mΩ2 l/vector ρ)∂fe ∂/vector p=fe−f0e τ. (28) This way of inclusion of local regimes (with subsequent aver aging over all directions of /vectorΩl) can be adaptable to the strong turbulence. 5 THE SELF-SUSTAINED ROTATION First of all, we note that any rotation induces some addition al electric field /vectorE0, which is directed towards the axis of rotation (z-axis). Ass ume that the initially non-rotating plasma system resides in the external magneti c field/vectorB0=/vector ezB0. 1) If the electron surplus exists (∆ >0), then the radial field /vectorE0ρis directed to thez-axis. The /vectorEoρ×/vectorBdrift of charged particles results in the movement round a circle. The originated centrifugal force causes partial s eparation of charges. Therefore, the field |/vectorE0ρ|will increase resulting in sustaining of rotation. Thus, a collective rotation with /vectorΩ directed as /vectorB(parallel) arises spontaneously in a plasma system with an electron surplus. 2) If the ion surplus exists (i.e. ∆ <0), then the radial field /vectorE0ρis directed from thezaxis. The/vectorE0ρ×/vectorBdrift initiates rotation with /vectorΩ being antiparallel to /vectorB. However, the partial separation of charges, which is cause d by a centrifugal force, results in decreasing |E0ρ|. This effect counteracts the rotation. Since there exists the rotation with /vectorΩ antiparallel to /vectorBin a positive (only) particle system (it is some limit), there exists some critical value o f the ion surplus ∆ c (∆ = ∆ c<0), starting from which the spontaneous rotation of plasma ( /vectorΩ an- tiparallel to /vectorB) is possible. We shall show that the spontaneous rotation with /vectorΩ parallel to /vectorBcan arise in an initially neutral plasma system (∆ = 0). The condition, un der which the self- rotation arises, is Ω R0<vd; herevdis the drift velocity, i.e. B0ΩR0/c<−E0ρ. The equality in the condition is possible for Ω = 0 and Ω = Ω self. Which equi- librium is stable? We note, that the equiprobable rotationa l small disturbances (/vectorΩ→0; or, factually, the ratio of the rotational energy to kTis small) with /vectorΩ parallel and antiparallel to /vectorBare not equivalent for the plasma system as a whole. As a result, plasma will rotate on the average in some d efinite direction: any rotational disturbance produces the radial field /vectorE0ρdirected toward the axis of rotation, but the appeared /vectorEoρ×/vectorBdrift promotes rotational disturbances with /vectorΩ parallel to /vectorBonly. We have for the other limit (the case of externally init iated large/vectorΩ, i.e.MiΩ2ρ2/(2kT)≫1) the inequality Ω ρ0>vd, since the limitations onE0ρalways exist for any plasma system: −∞< Emin 0ρ≤E0ρ≤Emax 0ρ<∞. Therefore, the drift opposes the rotation. Thus, the rotati on tends to some equi- librium Ω self/ne}ationslash= 0 for ∆ = 0. In the general case, when the rotation ( /vectorΩ is parallel to /vectorB0) arises by any reason, the separation of charges and electric field arise. A s a result, the /vectorE×/vectorB drift of charged particles (the movement round a circle) ari ses. This movement 13will either add to the initial rotation or subtract from it. E ventually, the stable rotation is established. From the equation vd= Ω(ρ,z)ρ, where the drift velocity is /vector vd=−cE0ρ(ρ,z)/vector eϕ B0 it follows, that the stable rotation frequency is Ωself(ρ,z) =−cE0ρ(ρ,z) ρB0, (29) withE0ρ(ρ,z) taken from (6) and |Bz|≪|B0|. Under an assumption, that the originated magnetic field /vectorBzis comparable to /vectorB0, the following substitution needs to be done in equation (25 ):B0→B0+Bz withBztaken from (10). In this case the self-sustained rotation of plasma takes place. We make some remarks. 1) Indeed, to evaluate the rotational state stability one ca n involve the energy balance. In this case the energy surplus characterizes qual itatively the rate (or time) of transition. However, a rather complex integral sys tem of equations for Ωselfcan be solved numerically (or by a perturbative method) for a ll specific values of plasma system parameters only. 2) Ω selftends to zero for the temperature high enough. 3) If the external magnetic field /vectorB0is zero, then the self-sustained rotation is impossible (the velocity ρΩselfmust be greater than the speed of light). 4) If several quasistable field distributions (distinguish ed by a potential barrier) can exist, then the existence of several quasistable rotati ng regimes (with Ωj self) is possible. 6 CONCLUSIONS The generation of electric and magnetic nonhomogeneous sel f-fields in rotating plasma can be explained by various actions of the centrifuga l force on dissimilar particles. There are different ρ-distributions of these particles and the partial sep- aration of charges. Therefore, the electric field arises (se e (6),(8)). The magnetic field (see (9),(10)) exists as a result of rotation of charged regions (the mag- netic actions are not compensated). As for relation to the ph ysics topics from Sec.I, there are new peculiarities regarding the self-cons istent description. All self-fieldsEρ(ρ,z),Ez(ρ,z),Bρ(ρ,z),Bz(ρ,z) are taken into consideration. The self-sustained rotation (which origins from initially neu tral state) exists as a re- sult of the particles drifts in the electric self-field and ex ternal magnetic field (see 14(29)). This is a new result. The dielectric constant tensor i n rotating plasma differs from that in non-rotating plasma. As the result of pla sma inhomogeneity and accelerated motion, the resonance conditions change (s ee (22),(24)). There are new poles in a disturbed distribution function and, ther efore, new terms in the Landau damping. The local-rotational description (ove r rotating ”cells”) of plasma can be useful. APPENDIX: Derivation of the disturbed distribution function The problem is to obtain the disturbed electron distributio n function. We substitute (17-21) and the force (13) into the kinetic equat ion (16), correct to the second order ( δf,/vectorE′,/vectorB′are small). Then it turns out that i(/vectork′/vector v−ω)δfe+ef0e T(/vector v/vectorE′)−ef0e TcΩρ(B′ ρvz−B′ zvρ)+ mΩ2 1(ρ,z)/vector ρ∂δfe ∂/vector p−e c[/vector v×/vectorB01]∂δfe ∂/vector p−e/vectorE(1) 0z∂δfe ∂/vector p= 0, (A1) where Ω2 1(ρ,z) = Ω2−eE0ρ(ρ,z) mρ−eB0z mcΩ,/vectorB01=/vectorB0−2mc e/vectorΩ, /vectorE(1) 0z=/vectorE0z−Ωρ cB0ρ/vector ez. Transferring to the cylindrical coordinate system ( vz,v⊥,ϕ) in the velocity space (Fig. 2), one gets i[kzvz+k⊥v⊥cosϕ−ω+S(/vector r)ρv⊥cos(ϕ−α) +S(/vector r)zvz]δfe+ef0e T(/vector v/vectorE′)− ef0eΩρ Tc(B′ ρvz−B′ zv⊥cos (ϕ−α)) +{Ω2 1ρcos(ϕ−α)−ωρ Besin(ϕ−α)vz}∂δfe ∂v⊥+ [ω(z) Be−Ω2 1ρ v⊥sin(ϕ−α)−ωρ Becos (ϕ−α)vz v⊥]∂δfe ∂ϕ+ [ωρ Besin (ϕ−α)v⊥−eE(1) 0z1 m]∂δfe ∂vz= 0, (A2) wherek⊥is the given value, sin α=d ρ,dis the minimum distance from the center to the ray. Then we obtain the equation ∂δfe ∂ϕ+ia1sinϕ+b1cosϕ+d1 a2sinϕ+b2cosϕ+ 1δfe=Q(ϕ), (A3) where a1=S(/vector r)v⊥d ω(z) Be, b1=k⊥v⊥+S(/vector r)/radicalbig ρ2−d2v⊥ ω(z) Be, d1=kzvz−ω+S(/vector r)vzz ω(z) Be, 15-