Unnamed: 0
int64
0
372k
title
stringlengths
33
257
username
stringlengths
4
785
timestamp
stringlengths
4
30
decision
stringclasses
4 values
comment
stringlengths
2
14.5k
topic
stringlengths
13
237
policies
stringlengths
4
222
policy_title
stringclasses
94 values
policy_index
int64
0
93
100
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Armenian historiography
User:Brandmeister
09:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
keep
"I don't wonder, given who is prodding the article. Another case of and it is not ""certain scholars"", but even Armenian ones or of Armenian heritage, such as Suny, not to mention the third-parties. Indeed, this is just the tip of the iceberg and I have much more to write. The criticism clearly detected several forgeries in particular, so it falls under the falsification of history template pretty well. And I don't think that Turkkaya Ataov or even just knowledgeable man can't debunk the misattribution and fake caption for quite notable painting"
Deletion of Criticism of Armenian historiography
WP:IDONTLIKEIT
Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
20
101
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salustiano Sanchez
User:Newshunter12
01:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
delete
"This article blatantly fails , , and . There is no policy that the ""oldest x"" is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like he played an instrument while growing up, was partially self-educated, and the standard longevity secret. His name, life dates, and nationality are best handled on the three lists they already reside on. This is not needed"
Deletion of Salustiano Sanchez
WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E||WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB
Wikipedia:Notability
71
102
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrimaveraReader (software)
User:Ubiquity
10:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
delete
WP:PROMO|Promotional article that lets the reader know all about the product's features without ever establishing (or even asserting) |notability. References are self-published or commercial
Deletion of PrimaveraReader (software)
WP:N
Wikipedia:Notability
71
103
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annual Assault 2008
User:Esradekan
00:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
delete
article fails to establish notability as per #Albums.2C_singles_and_songs|#Albums
Deletion of Annual Assault 2008
WP:MUSIC
Wikipedia:Notability
71
104
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapan Purkait
User:Paste
10:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
delete
Autobio that fails no independent coverage and looks like a vanity article
Deletion of Swapan Purkait
WP:BIO
Wikipedia:Notability
71
105
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiyas Jamal
User:CommanderWaterford
19:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
delete
per nom, I PRODed him. An usual lawyer, no given
Deletion of Jiyas Jamal
WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
106
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasper (singer)
User:Greg
13:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
delete
"Fails and . And I'd like to point out that this discussion has two nominations for ""keep"", one by the original editor. If you remove all comments by the original editor (who seems to be a ), the discussion is fairly bland. For those interested, you can"
Deletion of Jasper (singer)
WP:N||WP:V||WP:SPA
Wikipedia:Notability
71
107
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond's Run
User:Robert
06:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
delete
or '''Speedy Delete''' as |G12 - Seems to have been copied from a blurb
Deletion of Raymond's Run
WP:G12
Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion
76
108
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Paul's Parish, Azam Basti
User:Atlantic306
17:22, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
keep
as passes for the news coverage it has attracted
Deletion of St Paul's Parish, Azam Basti
WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
109
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Revolutionary Ideology
User:Stifle
19:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
delete
per etc
Deletion of American Revolutionary Ideology
WP:NOR
Wikipedia:No original research
12
110
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wanda harrell
User:Valrith
22:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
delete
Possibly written by the subject of the article, but fails at any rate
Deletion of Wanda harrell
WP:BIO
Wikipedia:Notability
71
111
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice hockey at the 1998 Winter Olympics match stats (women)
User:Lugnuts
15:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
delete
Obvious . All the pertinent information is contained in the main tournament summary. And this is all unsourced too
Deletion of Ice hockey at the 1998 Winter Olympics match stats (women)
WP:NOTSTATS
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
112
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rendall (actor)
User:EuroCarGT
03:55, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
delete
after performing a web search on the subject, he is a minor actor, I could't find much coverage on David Rendall indicating he is |not notable
Deletion of David Rendall (actor)
WP:NACTOR
Wikipedia:Notability
71
113
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armaan Story of a Storyteller
User:Coderzombie
19:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
delete
per and failing
Deletion of Armaan Story of a Storyteller
WP:PROMOTION||WP:NMOVIE
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
114
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetLunchin
User:Northamerica1000
11:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
delete
Only finding http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-04-17/news/61253805_1_chefs-bridges-gap-foodies one source that provides significant coverage. Does not meet
Deletion of GetLunchin
WP:N
Wikipedia:Notability
71
115
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Paramore songs (2nd nomination)
User:Frankie
14:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
keep
This list is a different item from the discography and it serves a different purpose. It could be included on the discography, but that may be bloating an article with information that is beyond its scope. The information ''is'' redundant when presented like this, but it is inevitable that any list will replicate information found elsewhere, since its purpose is to centralize such information for better access by the user. Lastly, I don't think that is much of an issue here, as the songs is the lowest point we can get to in terms of coverage (I think we would mostly agree that List of Paramore Verses is over the top). The notes section of the table looks like |original research, so it should either be sourced properly, or be dropped
Deletion of List of Paramore songs (2nd nomination)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:OR
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
116
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unleashed (Skillet album)
User:Lawrencekhoo
05:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
delete
Fails . Also, there is hardly any material except for the track listing. The article as currently exists is specifically forbidden by the guideline. On a side note, video views is not a basis for notability
Deletion of Unleashed (Skillet album)
WP:NALBUM||WP:NALBUM
Wikipedia:Notability
71
117
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophy Gardner
User:RightCowLeftCoast
19:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
merge
to Next United Kingdom general election; Subject appears to not have received significant coverage outside of being a candidate in an upcoming election; therefore per the article should be made into a redirect into the article about that particular race. Outside of the political race subject does not appear to receive |significant coverage from |tertiary reliable sources to indicate subject is notable per , , or
Deletion of Sophy Gardner
WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:SIGCOV||WP:PSTS||WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER||WP:NPOL
Wikipedia:Deletion policy
19
118
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stratified multi criteria decision making
User:XOR
17:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
delete
"The very first sentence of the article is an admission that this is |too soon. The !vote above, with its insistence that the method was ""proposed and published '''for the first time in July 2018'''"", makes a very good case for deletion (albeit inadvertently"
Deletion of Stratified multi criteria decision making
WP:TOOSOON
Wikipedia:Too soon
1
119
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinjini Kundu
User:The
23:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
keep
added another source, meets
Deletion of Shinjini Kundu
WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
120
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave
User:Stifle
20:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
delete
inclusion criteria are too arbitrary. See items 9 and 10
Deletion of List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave
WP:LC
Wikipedia:Listcruft
66
121
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voltage (Skrillex album)
User:Gongshow
07:17, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
delete
per . No significant coverage in reliable sources, no confirmed release date or track listing. If/when this album is released, the coverage will presumably follow for this notable artist. An article can be created at that time. For now, this possible upcoming release does not meet or at this time
Deletion of Voltage (Skrillex album)
WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG||WP:NALBUMS
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
122
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruthellen Josselson
User:Ad
06:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
keep
This is a reluctant keep since there is clear evidence of COI. But the Fulbright Fellowship is a pretty major award. It satisfies and . I am less sure about the other two awards. But the Fulbright is sufficient on its own
Deletion of Ruthellen Josselson
WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMICS
Wikipedia:Notability
71
123
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bushism
User:Crockspot
19:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
delete
per nom. Filled with POV, , poorly sourced, unencyclopedic, and probably violates . I'm not opposed to the topic, per se. But this execution is wrong in so many ways
Deletion of Bushism
WP:OR||WP:BLP
Wikipedia:No original research
12
124
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video game websites
User:Bruguiea
04:12, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
delete
by a web directory. Unmaintainble and liable to be POV
Deletion of List of video game websites
WP:NOT
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
125
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dre Davis
User:Winner
23:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
delete
Non notable actress, fails
Deletion of Dre Davis
WP:BIO
Wikipedia:Notability
71
126
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tharizdun
User:Folken
21:19, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
merge
to List of Greyhawk deities, as there is no ''significant'' coverage from multiple reliable independent secondary sources, topic doesn't establish notability per . The newly added sources don't even allow the article to comply to
Deletion of Tharizdun
WP:GNG||WP:NOTPLOT
Wikipedia:Notability
71
127
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Dhanayake
User:BlackJack
10:33, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
keep
Although these obsessive anti-CRIN individuals will not admit it, there are in existence significant Sri Lankan sources as we were able to establish in the case of Suresh Perera (Old Cambrians cricketer). A contact in Sri Lanka was willing to check a highly reputable Sinhalese newspaper, ''Dinamina'', for a specific match report and found additional information about that player. While we obviously cannot expect anyone in Sri Lanka to perform short-term checks of ''Dinamina'' for every single first-class player, the match report she did check proves not only that Sinhalese sources exist but also that their cricket coverage effectively matches that of newspapers in the English-speaking countries. The fact of this level of coverage by ''Dinamina'' and other Sinhalese publications meets the terms of . These nominations are disruptive
Deletion of S. Dhanayake
WP:NEXIST
Wikipedia:Notability
71
128
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Online Communist Party
User:Stormtracker94
12:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
delete
per and
Deletion of World Online Communist Party
WP:WEB||WP:V
Wikipedia:Notability
71
129
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyeema Morgan
User:Gobonobo
22:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
keep
Morgan has works in the permanent collections of the Bowdoin College Museum of Art and the Menil Collection and meets #4(b) with nine solo/duo exhibitions as well as residencies at Smack Mellon and the Skowhegan School of Painting and Sculpture. She also meets GNG with significant coverage in https://www.dailycamera.com/2020/09/17/fall-exhibits-at-bmoca-capture-the-cosmos-and-fracture-the-female-formula/ Daily Camera, https://bombmagazine.org/articles/soft-power-hard-margins-nyeema-morgan-interviewed/ BOMB magazine, and https://www.arcadeprojectzine.com/features/the-stem-the-flower-the-root-the-seed Arcade Project. This article doesn't yet include all of her exhibitions (which also have references... see https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323809304578429202021577858 Wall Street Journal, https://www.artforum.com/picks/itasca-62459 ArtForum, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/advice-to-young-female-artists-542609#.V6y--CifpP8.twitter ArtNet
Deletion of Nyeema Morgan
WP:ARTIST
Wikipedia:Notability
71
130
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xodo
User:Dialectric
18:41, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
delete
Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. As above, a search turned up incidental mentions but no significant coverage. Article was created by an Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|SPA as possibly promotional
Deletion of Xodo
WP:RS||WP:RS
Wikipedia:Reliable sources
31
131
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (4th nomination)
[[User talk:SSTflyer|sst✈]]
13:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
keep
as a pass of . If this is not a medical topic it does not need to meet medical SNGs. Saying that this should be deleted for failing is like saying that Moses should be deleted for failing
Deletion of Involuntary celibacy (4th nomination)
WP:SIGCOV||WP:MEDRS||WP:PORNBIO
Wikipedia:Notability
71
132
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal City (film)
User:Liquidfinale
13:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
delete
as either a hoax, or zero claim to notability under |notability guidelines for films. Best regards
Deletion of Animal City (film)
WP:NF
Wikipedia:Notability
71
133
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleg Frish
User:Edison
15:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
delete
It has not been demonstrated that he satisfies . Not everyone who records a record at Capitol Studios automatically gets an encyclopedia article. Did Capitol release the record, or was it recorded at Capitol for private distribution? How high did it climb in the popular music charts? Perhaps someone could demonstrate that he also has multiple reliable and independent sources with substantial coverage
Deletion of Oleg Frish
WP:BIO
Wikipedia:Notability
71
134
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Holtzman
User:Alphachimp
11:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
delete
WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not free hosting for his resume. Also
Deletion of Jason Holtzman
WP:BIO
Wikipedia:Notability
71
135
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Clemmensen
User:Wine
02:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
delete
to Short Stack per . This one's easy
Deletion of Andrew Clemmensen
WP:BAND
Wikipedia:Notability
71
136
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ascertia
User:Ihcoyc
14:47, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
delete
and '''salt'''. |Yet another
Deletion of Ascertia
WP:MILL
Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill
32
137
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexi Love
User:Richard3120
21:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
delete
"I completely agree with Hullabaloo Wolfowitz that Wikipedia should not suppress potentially embarrassing information just because the subject demands it. The trouble is, I cannot find a single reliable source about this person that mentions the name ""Lexi Love"" in connection with her, or her past career. The arguments for keeping the article thus completely fail , and on its own, the article fails . If someone shows me a reliable source that explicitly states that this person was Lexi Love, I'd be happy to change my vote"
Deletion of Lexi Love
WP:V||WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Verifiability
2
138
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riccardo Corradini
User:Edinburgh
23:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
delete
Fails and relevant football guidelines
Deletion of Riccardo Corradini
WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
139
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Matiss
User:onel5969
14:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
delete
Bingo by {{u|Mccapra}} - who was apparently reviewing this at the same time I was. Might be a case of , but definitely a case of overzealous representation by her PR team
Deletion of Marina Matiss
WP:TOOSOON
Wikipedia:Too soon
1
140
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Dragunsky
User:Kges1901
20:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
keep
Dragunsky is notable per and with significant coverage in Russian sources, being a colonel general, and relatively rare double Hero of the Soviet Union, his country's highest honorary title. AfD is not cleanup
Deletion of David Dragunsky
WP:GNG||WP:MILPEOPLE
Wikipedia:Notability
71
141
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarbe Yadullahi
User:Coolabahapple
15:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
delete
does not meet or as a gsearch brings up no reviews, nothing useable
Deletion of Zarbe Yadullahi
WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
142
"Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ""Blog"" of ""Unnecessary"" Quotation Marks"
User:Jasynnash2
12:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
delete
OT| Wikipedia is not news nor for processing news stories, the website itself fails as well as the majority of | notability points, it is unencyclopedic and an unlikely search term
"Deletion of The ""Blog"" of ""Unnecessary"" Quotation Marks"
WP:WEB||WP:N
Wikipedia:Notability
71
143
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saltwater Croc vs. Great White Shark
User:Scientizzle
20:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
delete
The show isn't notable enough to warrant individual pages for each episode. And the commentary on the result was completely |OR. I'm going to de-red link Animal Face-Off right now to discourage more of these articles
Deletion of Saltwater Croc vs. Great White Shark
WP:OR
Wikipedia:No original research
12
144
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siri Gamage
User:RayAYang
14:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
delete
Fails WP:PROF as Xxan says, and press mentions seem to be insignificant for in general
Deletion of Siri Gamage
WP:BIO
Wikipedia:Notability
71
145
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanguard (2011 film)
User:RL0919
21:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
delete
Decently done up to look like a regular film article, but at its heart this is , with a bit of as well
Deletion of Vanguard (2011 film)
WP:SPAM||WP:CRYSTAL
Wikipedia:Spam
26
146
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suspension Training
User:Keeper76
15:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
comment
towards keep. I declined the speedy on this one, and added the NYT reference. I was going to continue to see if this was viable, but decided to go offline instead. Not to a gym, just to a different television|sitting position like most Wikipedians I presume. Gazimoff's references are very good, seem independent. Yes, this was added from a new editor, presumable a editor, but I think it just might be notable. I very much like Trulyblue's draft more than this one, they can easily be merged. In fact, Trulyblue, be |bold and do it! You are allowed to update the article while the debate runs. In fact, I just gutted the good faith out of it, as it wasn't helping this debate at all
Deletion of Suspension Training
WP:COI||WP:BOLD||WP:OR
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest
59
147
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK Semera
[[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- Banjeboi]]
15:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
comment
I'm quite concerned about the itey-ness here and would feel more comfortable if some experienced in that region could offer some insight. A school of that capacity and length of existence is quite likely to have stumbled into some notability and may not know what lever to pull at wikipedia to sort that out. I don't see this as a hoax as much as newbies needing help
Deletion of SMK Semera
WP:B
Wikipedia:Bots
91
148
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Ayo
User:Wikicology
10:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
delete
fails . Possible policy violation confirmed here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/588676919 where the article creator clearly dislosed to be an Alumni of Covenant University where the subject is a vice chancellor. Perhaps he created it for his vice chancellor
Deletion of Charles Ayo
WP:GNG||WP:COI
Wikipedia:Notability
71
149
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rio (Amatrice)
User:SportingFlyer
05:13, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
keep
Looks like there are plenty of sources available in Italian and maybe French. First one I found was http://www.meteoweb.eu/foto/la-frazione-di-rio-di-amatrice-distrutta-dal-terremoto-gallery/id/740964/, which isn't necessarily sigcov but gets it over and potentially . I've linked the article to its other languages
Deletion of Rio (Amatrice)
WP:V||WP:GEOLAND
Wikipedia:Verifiability
2
150
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedrich Nichtmargen
User:DarkAudit
15:10, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
delete
as non-notable and . This reads like an ad. Wikipedia is not free ad space
Deletion of Friedrich Nichtmargen
WP:SPAM
Wikipedia:Spam
26
151
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Leek (2nd nomination)
User:Starblind
18:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
delete
per or '''Speedy delete''' per previous AfD
Deletion of Young Leek (2nd nomination)
WP:MUSIC
Wikipedia:Notability
71
152
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sci.psychology.psychotherapy
User:Wiki_alf
09:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
delete
unless I'm missing something obvious here, this does not meet
Deletion of Sci.psychology.psychotherapy
WP:WEB
Wikipedia:Notability
71
153
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluorine pill
User:Allisonmontgomery69
23:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
delete
per
Deletion of Fluorine pill
WP:V
Wikipedia:Verifiability
2
154
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fir Hill Manor
User:Oakshade
21:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
keep
per nom (outside of the nonsensical contention. Nom states that there was a BBC documentary about this topic as well as several news outlets giving coverage
Deletion of Fir Hill Manor
WP:BLP1E
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
15
155
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himatdan Gadhavi
User:J04n
18:38, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
delete
unable to find significant coverage in |reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced |BLP
Deletion of Himatdan Gadhavi
WP:RS||WP:BLP
Wikipedia:Reliable sources
31
156
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manjeet Kumar
User:PRehse
19:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
delete
As per nominator. Clearly does not meet and the references are general and not specifically about him
Deletion of Manjeet Kumar
WP:NBOX
Wikipedia:Notability
71
157
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernie Bro
User:E
23:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
comment
I surmise that some of the ''delete'' iVotes were prompted by the sourcing in the article which, when I came to it, was sourced heavily to blogs and non-mainstream news outlets. My rewrite depends on major, mainstream sources like the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal and The Atlantic and USA Today. Really, I think with coverage that is ongoing, and in-depth since October, this topic sails past . The larger challenge was not too few sources in searches, but, rather, sifting through the myriad hits on this topic in reliable sources
Deletion of Bernie Bro
WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
158
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding sheep (3rd nomination)
User:Otto4711
18:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
delete
not notable as a concept in that there do not appear to be independent reliable sources that significantly cover the subject. The article conflates sheep that explode in video games with sheep who trigger bombs with sheep that explode via growth. These are unrelated to each other and the conflation constitutes |original research by sythesis
Deletion of Exploding sheep (3rd nomination)
WP:OR
Wikipedia:No original research
12
159
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iaoco
User:ThaddeusB
20:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
delete
I'm not seeing any substantial |reliable source coverage in my good faith searches
Deletion of Iaoco
WP:RS
Wikipedia:Reliable sources
31
160
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Walmart brands
User:Carrite
00:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
comment
I'm sort of in land on this one. I can certainly see utility here and really don't see it as advertising, as the nominator intimates. Does that make it an encyclopedic topic? I'm less sure of that
Deletion of List of Walmart brands
WP:ITSUSEFUL
Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
20
161
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhail Katz
User:Xxanthippe
00:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
comment
All three persons above would be likely to pass the above average professor test. rof finds that notability may be established by citations in the scholarly literature to the subject's work and goes into some detail about this in Note 1. If editors wish to change Wikipedia policy they should do so on the policy pages, not here
Deletion of Mikhail Katz
WP:P
Wikipedia:Portal
50
162
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArchLabs
User:Eggishorn
01:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
keep
Articles in https://www.linuxinsider.com/story/84823.html''Linux Insider'', https://itsfoss.com/archlabs-review/ ''It's FOSS'', and https://stationx.rocks/blogs/station-x-featured-distros/archlabs-5-0-one-of-the-best-gets-even-better ''StationX'' are significant coverage in indepedent, reliable sources and so passes
Deletion of ArchLabs
WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
163
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Trump (2nd nomination)
User:Hmlarson
00:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
keep
breadth of articles indicate criteria is met. Article could use expansion, not deletion per
Deletion of Tiffany Trump (2nd nomination)
WP:GNG||WP:ATD
Wikipedia:Notability
71
164
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betsy Sweet
User:GPL93
22:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
delete
Fails and there is not enough significant coverage outside of her campaigns to pass at the moment. The article can be recreated if she wins the election. Best
Deletion of Betsy Sweet
WP:NPOL||WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
165
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flyswatter (album) (3rd nomination)
User:Sergecross73
15:15, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
delete
Per nom, it seems the article creators don't seem to understand that |Notability is not inherited
Deletion of Flyswatter (album) (3rd nomination)
WP:NALBUMS
Wikipedia:Notability
71
166
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wuxx
User:Rhododendrites
04:43, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
comment
ping|JDDJS}} Why not these? I don't see any substantial edits other than the sockpuppet (the only one which looks big was actually just filling in bare references, which isn't a substantial improvement. &mdash
Deletion of Wuxx
WP:G5
Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion
76
167
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moshe Sacks
User:J04n
18:24, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
delete
unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject. Does not meet or
Deletion of Moshe Sacks
WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO
Wikipedia:Notability
71
168
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saman Halgamuge
User:Dan
23:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
delete
non-notable University professor- fails
Deletion of Saman Halgamuge
WP:NACADEMIC
Wikipedia:Notability
71
169
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CthulhuTech
User:Protonk
07:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
delete
Fails and . There are academic journals devoted to Games (namely Games and Culture) and there are plenty of journals, magazines, books and articles devoted to the roleplaying game industry. A lack of sources found doesn't immediately mean that our search methods are too parochial. The sources cited in the article and noted above are mainly non-RS. I'm on the fence about RPGnet because they appear to have some clout but don't specify where the edited content ends and user-generated content begins. Most of the rest don't count. I don't find anything on Books, News or Scholar ('Scept the io9 post, and io9 isn't an RS
Deletion of CthulhuTech
WP:CORP||WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
170
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonia Bernath
User:Ahecht
22:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
keep
Assuming the Sunday Times article really is a profile, and not an interview, that, combined with the other sources, seems to fulfill
Deletion of Antonia Bernath
WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
171
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest cities in England by population
User:Andrewa
14:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
keep
No reason has been given for deletion in terms of Wikipedia:deletion policy|deletion policy, and I can't see one to raise. I think we can Wikipedia:assume good faith|assume good faith about the nomination, and even commend the general conduct of the discussion. But it wouldn't hurt to review anyway, in view of the procedural mistakes of which this nomination is the most recent. The claim that there is consensus to delete appears to be false; If there is consensus, it's to merge and redirect, which shouldn't involve an AfD nomination anyway
Deletion of List of largest cities in England by population
WP:POINT
Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
28
172
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Tridevil
[[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom]]
17:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
delete
"WP:BLP1E a flash in the pan hoax that made some ""news of the weird"" filler before being ""exposed"". no indication of this being a hoax of any lasing significance that anyone will mention after the next tabloid sexpose hits the screens. Wikipedia should not be playing into her desire to become ""famous"
Deletion of Jasmine Tridevil
WP:NOTADVERT
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
173
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big T
User:Canyouhearmenow
11:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
delete
Subject fails , and standards and requirements. All search material chases back to subjects own created articles in the majority of cases. Awards are not mainstream recognized, although that means very little as there are tons of awards out there. Finally the discography listed is not found in Soundscan or bar coded so I would assume they would fail as well
Deletion of Big T
WP:MUSIC||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:BLP||WP:ALBUM
Wikipedia:Notability
71
174
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Before You Exit
User:Ubelowme
19:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
delete
I combed through pages of Ghits and found nothing that qualified under criterion #1 of , although there were a couple of very brief interview bits including one in Seventeen magazine (doesn't qualify under #1 as it's the band talking about itself). I could see no other criterion that potentially applied except #5 and, to the best of my knowledge, under #5, they release their own music through iTunes. This group may become more |notable in the future but there's not enough in the way of |reliable sources yet
Deletion of Before You Exit
WP:BAND||WP:N||WP:RS
Wikipedia:Notability
71
175
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identical (film)
User:MichaelQSchmidt
01:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
delete
modified stance from original keep) per |research, research, research... and yes, post-1982 UPI sources should be investigated thoroughly. I have not been able to find any connection between the interview on http://www.independentfilmquarterly.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1025&Itemid=125 ''Independent Film Quarterly'' and the filmmakers or production company. And Ed Asner's words quoted in ''AV Club'' do not seem spurious. Nor does the little blurb about this film in http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/461977/Bleecker-Street/overview ''The New York Times'' under its original title of ''Bleecker Street'' seem fraught with cast, crew or production conflicts. That said and lacking notability for a separate article, we have enough |verifiability that this title may be redirected-after-deletion to the Ed Asner filmography and have allowed mentions in a related articles
Deletion of Identical (film)
WP:BEFORE||WP:V
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
67
176
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spark: A Mother's Story of Nurturing Genius
User:David
08:48, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
delete
"I'd been holding off on providing an opinion in this AfD in the hope that it would be possible to make a neutral article that covers the book in an appropriate level of depth while avoiding the hype and BLP problems that surround it. But signs point to no: the article text avoids those problems only by being too lacking in content, the sources we have in the article are all still hype and churnalism, and the remaining non-hype source identified here (the skeptic one) is only tangentially about the book and more about Barnett and the stories that have been built around him. And having at best only one non-publicity-driven source, it doesn't meet the ""two or more"" requirement of "
Deletion of The Spark: A Mother's Story of Nurturing Genius
WP:BKCRIT
Wikipedia:Notability
71
177
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tallahassee SC
User:onel5969
04:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
comment
Just like to point out to the closing editor, that not a single one of the keep !votes has provided the type of in-depth sourcing to show that any of these teams passes, , and they clearly do not pass . The only sources provided are a nice in-depth article from a non-RS source (urban pitch) and several token mentions of the Bugeaters team. The Tallahasee and AFC Mobile teams have nothing but routine local coverage. The Bugeaters turned up a whopping 8 hits, mostly local coverage, with a couple of brief mentions, the Central Texas team turned up zilch, while the Biloxi team turned up 2 local coverage articles
Deletion of Tallahassee SC
WP:GNG||WP:FOOTYN
Wikipedia:Notability
71
178
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rockets
User:Worthawholebean
15:36, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
delete
does not seem to meet . NN
Deletion of The Rockets
WP:MUSIC
Wikipedia:Notability
71
179
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semiotics of the structure
User:Chiswick
17:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
delete
google returns exactly 15 results, nearly all irrelevant; 1 by Tevet, 1 a wiki. Article seems entirely and very close to pure bafflegab, . Since it has few or no reliable independent citations (Anderson, M., Merrell, F., 1991. On Semiotic Modeling. is real but doesn't support the article's theory), delete seems unavoidable
Deletion of Semiotics of the structure
WP:OR||WP:NONSENSE
Wikipedia:No original research
12
180
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comey memos
User:LM2000
21:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
merge
Not independently notable. There are a lot of sources but not much longterm notability
Deletion of Comey memos
WP:NOTNEWS
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
181
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality in Star Trek
User:RFerreira
08:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
delete
major and original research issues, amongst other problems
Deletion of Sexuality in Star Trek
WP:SYNTH
Wikipedia:No original research
12
182
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halvsie
User:Gavin
20:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
delete
per nom. The article looks like |original research
Deletion of Halvsie
WP:OR
Wikipedia:No original research
12
183
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassavettes
NONE
14:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
delete
They do assert notability in their claim to have been chosen the best local band in Boston. However that may not rise to the standards of . The article does not meet which is critical especially in regards to their claim of best local band. JBEvans
Deletion of Cassavettes
WP:MUSIC||WP:ATTRIBUTION
Wikipedia:Notability
71
184
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Global Information Management
User:Mark
00:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
keep
In Scopus and has a JCR impact factor, so it meets notability via
Deletion of Journal of Global Information Management
WP:NJOURNALS
Wikipedia:Notability
71
185
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulrahman Elsamni
User:Bonadea
17:13, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
delete
"does not meet or . Having written one chapter of a EU document is not at all remarkable or grounds for notability. His Masters thesis (described in the article as ""his research"" - sorry, but no) has been quoted in a few places. Good for him, but it does not make him meet "
Deletion of Abdulrahman Elsamni
WP:NPROF||WP:GNG||WP:NPROF
Wikipedia:Notability
71
186
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thon (river)
User:Dolovis
03:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
keep
per
Deletion of Thon (river)
WP:GEOLAND
Wikipedia:Notability
71
187
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macau at the 2016 Asian Beach Games
User:Comatmebro
16:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
delete
Could not locate third-party coverage of this specific country in the Asia Beach games. Per nom, fails and should be deleted
Deletion of Macau at the 2016 Asian Beach Games
WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
188
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of the Harry Potter series
User:Dalejenkins
09:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
delete
per and the opening argument
Deletion of Chronology of the Harry Potter series
WP:PLOT
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
189
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Eustachian tube (band)
User:JohnCD
15:19, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
delete
nowhere near the standard of
Deletion of The Eustachian tube (band)
WP:BAND
Wikipedia:Notability
71
190
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of state parties of the Democratic Party (United States)
NONE
NONE
keep
WP:NOTDIRECTORY does not fit as a criticism of this particular article, as a quick glance will show. Additionally, oppose per , and . At Wikipedia lists have a purpose. This list fits perfectly into two of the three purposes.PURP From that guidance
Deletion of List of state parties of the Democratic Party (United States)
WP:LIST||WP:MOS||WP:LISTPURP
Wikipedia:Lists
36
191
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marius Kazlauskas
User:Argyle
17:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
delete
Fails and
Deletion of Marius Kazlauskas
WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL
Wikipedia:Notability
71
192
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Burritt
User:Siva1979
12:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
delete
Fails . Moreover, this article does not contain any |reliable sources as well. --|S
Deletion of Bruce Burritt
WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:ESP
Wikipedia:Notability
71
193
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Godly Ball Religion
User:Flyguy649
05:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
delete
Wikipedia is |not for religions made up while bored
Deletion of The Godly Ball Religion
WP:NFT
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day
88
194
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM City Caloocan
User:DAJF
05:52, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
delete
No indication or assertion of notability (#A7
Deletion of SM City Caloocan
WP:CSD
Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion
76
195
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rare Region 4 DVDs
User:Shawn
14:57, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
delete
Yep, an arbitrary selection of both titles ''and'' territories that violates a number of guidelines, I daresay, including
Deletion of List of Rare Region 4 DVDs
WP:NOTCATALOGUE
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
69
196
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howie Wright (baseball)
User:GPL93
16:04, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
delete
Being in a school's individual hall of fame doesn't meet . Most of the sources, one of which is literally his being confirmed as dead by the federal government, are primary or don't support . best
Deletion of Howie Wright (baseball)
WP:NCOLLATH||WP:GNG
Wikipedia:Notability
71
197
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hightower (Transformers)
User:Mathewignash
12:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
keep
to List_of_Transformers:_Robots_in_Disguise_characters#Build_Team per #5, as this is the character page for the anime series Hightower was a character in
Deletion of Hightower (Transformers)
WP:BEFORE
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
67
198
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noshoring
User:Tangerines
20:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
delete
As per
Deletion of Noshoring
WP:NEO
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary
10
199
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poku short film
User:MichaelQSchmidt
13:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
delete
for now. Searches show this seems |TOO SOON. Allow undeletion or recreation when Malayalam-reading Wikipedians can come up with sources
Deletion of Poku short film
WP:NYF
Wikipedia:Too soon
1