Datasets:

research-dump

/

wiki-stance-en

like 0

Follow

Hsuvas's Research Backups 1

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 attacks on Indian students in Australia

User:Gnangarra

01:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

comment

time to this discussion, it obvious that the article will be kept either as is or with no-consensus and this discussion remaining open is only attracting flyby-night/spa editor opinions, who dont either understand or are chosing to ignore it, leave the renaming for a separate fresh discussion

Deletion of 2009 attacks on Indian students in Australia

WP:SNOW||WP:AGF

Wikipedia:Snowball clause

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybercontrol

User:SheffieldSteel

20:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

delete

per

Deletion of Cybercontrol

WP:BOLLOCKS

Wikipedia:Complete bollocks

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Seal

User:Ukexpat

01:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

keep

Appears to meet , just

Deletion of Karen Seal

WP:PROF

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakanksha Sharma

User:Cait

16:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

keep

as per , Section 9- she won a major music competition Chhote Ustaad - Do Deshon Ki Ek Awaaz and placed second in Jo Jeeta Wohi Superstar. Also Section 10- she performed multiple songs for media productions (films, tv shows

Deletion of Aakanksha Sharma

WP:MUSICBIO

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Burke

User:Colonel

00:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

delete

I agree; this article has a total of four sources, three of which are local and one of which does not function correctly. Additionally, it is written in a manner which seemingly implies that the main contributor had a close connection to the subject, which violates in terms of neutrality. The best thing to do is to delete; if the subject were truly notable, there would be more third-party sources

Deletion of Lisa Burke

WP:BOLP

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs that have been considered among the greatest ever (second nomination)

User:ShadowHalo

04:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

delete

per

Deletion of List of songs that have been considered among the greatest ever (second nomination)

WP:OR

Wikipedia:No original research

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galkatas

User:Pharaoh

22:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

keep

per Icewhiz passes

Deletion of Galkatas

WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misty K. Snow

NONE

NONE

keep

"Though rticles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Politicians that suggests unelected candidates are often merged, is clear that unelected candidates can still qualify as notable on the basis of . Snow clearly does, and is not excluded by --that would only exclude her if the event she's known for were not ""significant"" (see condition #3--all three conditions must apply for exclusion). Snow attracted international press attention with a campaign numerous called ""historic"". When extensive reliable sources treat an event as significant, it's not the place of WP editors to overrule them. Here are some of those sources"

Deletion of Misty K. Snow

WP:A||WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:RS

Wikipedia:Attribution

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Luham bus crash

User:Necrothesp

21:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

keep

42 people dying in a road accident? Of course it's notable. Just imagine if it had happened in the USA or UK... We can't possibly expect an accident in Nepal to get a fraction of the coverage a similar accident would get in the developed world, but that doesn't mean it's any less notable.

Deletion of 2006 Luham bus crash

WP:SYSTEMIC

Wikipedia:Systemic bias

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.460 Rowland

User:Atlantic306

10:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

delete

as promotional for the company and product and does not have significant coverage in reliable sources so does not pass

Deletion of .460 Rowland

WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bieber on Twitter

User:Johnuniq

10:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

delete

WP:INDISCRIMINATE applies despite the fact that it does not explicitly preclude factoid lists. There is an enormous number of references and an enormous load of discussion so it is hard to be sure, but it seems there is no |secondary source on the actual ''topic'' (that is, the significance of Bieber's Twitter account). Anyone writing about Bieber is going to mention his tweets, and anyone talking about big accounts at Twitter is going to mention Bieber—those are reasons for a mention in the respective articles on Bieber and on Twitter, but they are not reasons for editors to |choose commentary to conclude that someone's tweets are notable

Deletion of Justin Bieber on Twitter

WP:SECONDARY||WP:SYNTH

Wikipedia:No original research

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch Hunters

User:Protonk

14:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

comment

the 'real world notability' statement I made was in order to ensure that it was clear this article should be judged on the merits of the |general notability guideline. In other words, the subject of the article doesn't present a compelling reason for us to |ignore all rules and cover it. If, for example, Jedilofty were to nominate Space Marines (Warhammer 40,000), I would argue that the subject's status as a primary sub-faction in 40k meant that we should not delete it. Here, the important guideline covering this topic is |notability. The subject isn't notable, as no third party sources cover it, so wikipedia probably shouldn't have an article on it. I'm afraid that this is much more the failure of Games Workshop than of Wikipedia. GW, as they profit from the publication of source material, guards their intellectual property jealously. This means that very few works exist which cover the fictional elements of the game that '''are not''' produced by games workshop. And things are probably going to get worse before they get better. There are roughly Wikipedia:WikiProject_Warhammer_40,000#Quality_Assessment|110 articles under the purview of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000|Warhammer 40K wikiProject and the eventual number is likely to be ~60. We've lost a lot of members to the project because of these strings of deletions (I think the 40K project peaked at ~200 articles) and we need editors to help us build encyclopedic (Not |exhaustive) coverage of these subject. Will you help us

Deletion of Witch Hunters

WP:GNG||WP:IAR||WP:N||WP:IINFO

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/378 Mannock Squadron

User:AustralianRupert

11:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

delete

I don't believe that this meets . Also, I believe there has been precedent regarding ATC squadrons before (but can't for the life of me remember the article in question, unfortunately, for which I apologise). The information about the squadron being the only one to be named after a person is certainly an interesting fact, and assuming it can be sourced, I have no dramas with it being added to the ATC article itself. I don't believe it is enough to make the unit itself notable, however

Deletion of 378 Mannock Squadron

WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dentacoin DCN

User:power

04:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

delete

While Dentacoin is somewhat infamous as an example of a silly idea, this article is a load of promotional crap and likely

Deletion of Dentacoin DCN

WP:UPE

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenan Yu

User:Little

07:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

delete

for now. Article about a young musician who has made a good start academically and won a notable young musician's award, but it's much to meet . One of three current references is autobiographical, and there's not enough independent, secondary coverage of him yet in English or (from my limited ability with Google Translate) Chinese

Deletion of Zenan Yu

WP:TOOSOON||WP:MUSICBIO

Wikipedia:Too soon

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Byrd

User:Ravenswing

18:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

delete

I see that someone's taken advantage of the option at IMDB to pay to submit a resume. It's not that he has minimal credits; it's that he has NO credits. Only contribution of a SPA. Complete , failure

Deletion of Brandon Byrd

WP:BIO||WP:VAIN

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay slang words and phrases (second nom)

User:IslaySolomon

06:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

delete

"From ""|What Wikipedia is not"": ''""Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a usage or jargon guide. Wikipedia articles are not...lists of such definitions...usage guides or slang and idiom guides""''. This is a list of dictionary defintions. Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines#Key_policies|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary|not a dictionary. Definitions of words go in Wiktionary, encyclopaedia articles go in Wikipedia. This is an unmaintainable list, mostly made up of |neologisms. It is largely |unverified, making it |original research"

Deletion of List of gay slang words and phrases (second nom)

WP:NOT||WP:NEO||WP:V||WP:OR

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Tarantal

User:Rusf10

00:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

keep

I think she does pass , according to WCVB's website http://www.wcvb.com/news-team/a4ea45c7-7a85-465d-b3bc-ccc6747b9007 she won an Emmy award

Deletion of Erika Tarantal

WP:JOURNALIST

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Conservative Party (Australia)

User:Nug

09:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

delete

per

Deletion of United Conservative Party (Australia)

WP:HOAX

Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Anti-Human Trafficking Committee

User:NinjaRobotPirate

10:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

delete

I guess there isn't anything to merge, and it doesn't look like there's any coverage outside of community newsletters. I agree that local organizations this marginal don't satisfy . Otherwise, if I became friends with a local reporter, our book club might become notable

Deletion of London Anti-Human Trafficking Committee

WP:ORG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (2nd nomination)

User:Versageek

17:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

keep

I know this is essentially , but this is one of those pages that draws in readers and makes the encyclopedia more interesting, even if it flouts a few of our guidelines. I think in this case, it would be best to apply , and keep the thing around a while longer

Deletion of List of common misconceptions (2nd nomination)

WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IAR

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajee Narinesingh (2nd nomination)

User:The

23:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

delete

For once, a argument that I agree with

Deletion of Rajee Narinesingh (2nd nomination)

WP:BLP1E

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Drebitt

User:Guest9999

14:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

delete

no significant coverage in independent, |reliable sources as required by the |general notability criteria. This is made obvious by the article itself which in the main is not even about the subject of the article but the series they are associated with. Notability is not inherited

Deletion of Robbie Drebitt

WP:RS||WP:NN

Wikipedia:Reliable sources

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raising for Effective Giving

User:Adrianrorheim

23:04, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

keep

the original, but give it a '''serious''' cleanup. If that doesn't work (and it doesn't seem like anyone has really given it a go), I'll agree to

Deletion of Raising for Effective Giving

WP:TNT

Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Minuto Mágico

User:Cindamuse

13:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

delete

The lack of translated sources forgoes verifiability at this time. If translation can be provided per , it may be possible to assess with a greater understanding of the content and notability. Until then, I am unable to recommend keeping the article

Deletion of O Minuto Mágico

WP:NONENG

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Disney song edits

User:Selket

23:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

delete

Wikipedia is |not an indiscriminate collection of information

Deletion of Radio Disney song edits

WP:NOT

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group-Office (third nomination)

User:Calton

05:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

delete

"Seems straightforward. ""I like it! I like it!"" doesn't trump basic |verifiability from |reliable sources, and the ""keep-because-enough-people-said-'I like it! I like it!'-very-recently"" rationales are pure bureaucratic nitpicking"

Deletion of Group-Office (third nomination)

WP:V||WP:RS

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desportivo de Cova Figueira (2nd nomination)

User:SportingFlyer

11:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

delete

fails and . I'm a weak delete on grounds since couple articles have been written on the club but they all appear to be from the same press release, I don't read Portuguese anyways so giving a slight benefit of the doubt, and other sources might be available. I cannot find any verification on rsssf.com the club ever played in the national competition or in the national cup. Was originally kept on a mistaken assumption between the island's first and second division. If kept, needs a massive cleanup

Deletion of Desportivo de Cova Figueira (2nd nomination)

WP:FOOTYN||WP:GNG||WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruhan Rajput

User:GSS

17:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

delete

per nom, there is no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject and fails also an article about the same subject was created in April under Draft:Ruhaan Rajput using the AfC process by a different user but the submission was declined twice due to the notability issue

Deletion of Ruhan Rajput

WP:NACTOR

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahe Ali

User:BC108

14:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

delete

If the article is to be believed the subject ''should'' be easy to find in reliable sources but like {{u|Jkudlick}} I just can't find them. The large number of SPAs here (making classic |non |arguments) and the repeated vandalism of this page make me think something greater is afoot. But, at the very least, notability is not shown

Deletion of Shahe Ali

WP:INTERESTING||WP:CRYSTAL

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientific Aggressive Fighting Techniques of America

User:Seicer

19:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

delete

WP:NN|Non-notable and |original research since my basic searches turned up mirrors, Wiki links, and unreliable sources

Deletion of Scientific Aggressive Fighting Techniques of America

WP:OR

Wikipedia:No original research

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depression Quest

User:Torchiest

16:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

keep

with a few comments. I would say that Brianna Wu is closest to a BLP1E case, as she had no coverage prior to GG and essentially all of her initial coverage was related to that. But my guess is there's enough coverage of other things she's said and done in the interim that her article would pass on its own now. I could possibly see ''Depression Quest'' getting merged to Zoe Quinn, but she herself has gotten plenty of coverage, a good amount before GamerGate ever happened, specifically for that game, as well as some controversy around a game jam event that happened in early 2014. And if that were the case, a merge discussion could take place outside of AFD. In fact, I'd say starting with potential merge discussions would have been more fruitful and perceived as less of an attack

Deletion of Depression Quest

WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The St Andrews Social Scientist

User:The

18:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

delete

The magazine fails otability|Notability which is hardly surprising because it has just been launched. No external source has written about it and the only source is the website itself. It may be that in future the magazine attracts notice and becomes a valid subject for an article. But WP should not establish notability, merely report it

Deletion of The St Andrews Social Scientist

WP:N

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shunta Araki

User:Spiderone

10:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

delete

the clear failure of should take precedence over scraping by on ; as above, the kanji looks slightly different so probably not the same player so no evidence of SIGCOV

Deletion of Shunta Araki

WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isigqumo

User:RGTraynor

13:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

delete

fails . There are ''zero'' hits on Google Scholar http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Isigqumo&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search, and something just raises my hackles when we read about a hitherto-unknown and -unnamed cant that's exclusively about explicit homosexual sex amongst blacks; I suspect hoax

Deletion of Isigqumo

WP:ATT

Wikipedia:Attribution

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For Lonely Lest the Wiser

User:Rjd0060

01:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

delete

The group itself does not meet |MUSIC guidelines, so delete this too

Deletion of For Lonely Lest the Wiser

WP:MUSIC

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juicy fruit 2

User:Jayden54

21:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

delete

completely fails (it doesn't even have its own domain

Deletion of Juicy fruit 2

WP:WEB

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surgical Hospital of Jonesboro

User:Scray

02:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

delete

Fails and - lacks evidence of notability, and in searching elsewhere I have not been able to find substantive/deep coverage by independent sources

Deletion of Surgical Hospital of Jonesboro

WP:GNG||WP:CORP

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XE166

User:Edison

21:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

delete

Advert provides no evidence for |notability

Deletion of XE166

WP:N

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zyggo

User:Less

17:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

delete

no significant coverage in IRS, fails both and

Deletion of Zyggo

WP:GNG||WP:SINGER

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDIFECS

User:NatGertler

03:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

delete

gnews hits are about 90% press releases, and most of the rest are two-to-four sentence mentions like http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/11/10/daily11.html this, but mixed in there is http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/print-edition/2011/07/22/edifecs-soars-with-software-for.html this more in-depth piece. Still, the article in its current state could probably get speedied as

Deletion of EDIFECS

WP:PROMO

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Couples Retreat

User:Schuym1

23:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

delete

per

Deletion of Couples Retreat

WP:NFF

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Agung Pribadi

User:Mentoz86

16:40, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

delete

article about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully professional league, which means that he fails . Also fails

Deletion of Muhammad Agung Pribadi

WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riograndense Republic

User:Opinoso

00:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

comment

"Bigdaddy, please |assume good faith, the discussion has taken a much better turn of recent, and we are trying to find an acceptable solution to the problem at hand, and I don't think going down that line of questioning is going to produce anything positive. You have agreed that removing the bit about the modern separatists is acceptable to you, and this is the main bone of contention. To merge the articles was clearly not in order to solve any ""ideological motivations"" since surely the removal or the aforementioned material would take care of that. I floated the idea as a possible solution, and fair enough it may not be ideal. The article can exist on its own as a stub, but I believe that the separatist part should be transferred to a standalone article on the issue on Brazil, should we find sufficent sources"

Deletion of Riograndense Republic

WP:AGF

Wikipedia:Assume good faith

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Thomas (sculptor)

User:AllyD

07:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

delete

There is a page featuring several of the subject's public sculptures at one site http://www.williamson-county-historical-commission.org/Round_rock/Chisholm_Trial_Crossing_Park_round_Rock_Texas.html here. I found nothing on Highbeam but https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Jim+Thomas%22+sculptor&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=fauZV6SvHuzR8gea0YHYDg#q=%22Jim+Thomas%22+sculptor&tbm=bks a Google Books search brought several mentions, as would be expected of a subject working in public spaces. The best may be the ''Southwestern Art'' (1973) item, but it is only a snippet view. Overall, although criterion 4(b) may perhaps be arguable, these brief mentions do not seem sufficient for the criteria, but happy to revise if someone can identify some verifiable critical coverage

Deletion of Jim Thomas (sculptor)

:WP:ARTIST

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGTOW

User:Wsiegmund

03:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

delete

as

Deletion of MGTOW

WP:NN

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current professional wrestling champions

User:Colapeninsula

10:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

keep

but restrict to notable championships and wrestlers. This page is useful for navigation, it's a list of Wikipedia articles, and it seems to meet . Arguments for deletion are based on what might happen to this page (e.g. it might become unmanageable) but that isn't a valid reason for deletion. The notability of a topic isn't based on whether it's a fair championship (otherwise we wouldn't have articles like Russian presidential election, 2012) but whether reliable sources write about it. Those proposing deletion claim that this has been decided by past precedent, but it would be nice if they'd provide links to precedent, rather than just asserting it

Deletion of List of current professional wrestling champions

WP:L

Wikipedia:Lists

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kundalini Awakening

User:Tokyogirl79

04:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

delete

per nom and Stuartyeates. This is entirely a promotional essay by the original contributor and a potential copyvio, as he stated above that he published this same article in a magazine. Please be aware that even if you are the original writer and give permission, this might still violate , as it could violate the copyright of the magazine it was published in. (And if you hold all copyrights, we still have to verify that you are who you claim to be- anyone can claim to be anyone on the internet. I can claim to be Mary, Queen of Scots, but that doesn't mean that I am!) Also, this is not a neutral or encyclopedic article and the research is all your own. Either way, this has no business being on Wikipedia. Assuming that this theory or magazine article is notable enough to be included on Wikipedia, it'd need a complete rewrite from top to bottom

Deletion of Kundalini Awakening

WP:COPYVIO

Wikipedia:Copyright violations

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutter Butter (2nd nomination)

User:J947

22:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

merge

to Nabisco per -R – Can't find any |significant coverage in |secondary, |reliable sources that are |independent of the |subject (See https://www.google.co.nz/search?dcr=0&biw=1422&bih=787&tbm=nws&q=%22Nutter+Butter%22+Nabisco+sandwich+cookie&oq=%22Nutter+Butter%22+Nabisco+sandwich+cookie&gs_l=psy-ab.3...12102.12102.0.12473.1.1.0.0.0.0.277.277.2-1.1.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.ZJKp25ZeQ_4 here and https://www.google.co.nz/search?dcr=0&biw=1422&bih=787&tbm=bks&q=%22Nutter+Butter%22+Nabisco+sandwich+cookie+william+a+turnier&oq=%22Nutter+Butter%22+Nabisco+sandwich+cookie+william+a+turnier&gs_l=psy-ab.3...1729.11048.0.12244.20.19.1.0.0.0.370.3965.2-5j8.13.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..6.0.0....0.6PJRlYOznyY here

Deletion of Nutter Butter (2nd nomination)

WP:ATD||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SECONDARY||WP:RS||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:PRIMARY

Wikipedia:Deletion policy

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Cake for Every Creature

User:Winkelvi

03:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

delete

per nom and

Deletion of Free Cake for Every Creature

WP:TOOSOON

Wikipedia:Too soon

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community College Futures Assembly

User:AnmaFinotera

22:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

delete

unnotable entity, fails and ; references assed are all from a single non-thirdparty source

Deletion of Community College Futures Assembly

WP:ORG||WP:N

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Losliya

[[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''' ]]

05:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

delete

Notability is measured by |significant coverage in reliable sources. This hasn't been met, however hotly the fervor of fanboys burns. If there are similar articles with even more meager coverage out there, feel free to file AfDs on them

Deletion of Losliya

WP:SIGCOV

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lester E. Taylor III

User:Shelbystripes

NONE

delete

As noted by nominator, it clearly fails . There's nothing in the article to suggest encyclopedic notability otherwise. If the mayor of every town in America got a Wiki page, that'd be a whole lot of unnecessary BLPs to deal with

Deletion of Lester E. Taylor III

WP:POLITICIAN

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Barnett Abrahams

User:Bozzio

04:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

delete

Non-notable school principal. Article is literally a http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/618-abrahams-louis-barnett direct copy of this. |Wikipedia is not a repository or a mirror, take it to WikiSource

Deletion of Louis Barnett Abrahams

WP:NOTREPOSITORY

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMIE

User:The

23:58, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

merge

and redirect to Institution of Engineers (India) - there is enough sourced content to add a useful section to the target so a straight redirect would not be a good idea. The sources verify the qualification but there is a lack of coverage to meet or to justify a stand-alone page

Deletion of AMIE

WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stokes twins

User:CosmicNotes

14:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

keep

"It looks like all 5 references in the article are in compliance with , they are all major news outlets from multiple countries like CNN, Inside Edition, UK news, etc. Google news search of their name also shows more reliable published sources not yet referenced, I think they should be added and the page expanded instead of deleted. It's currently a page without much info. Their notability also seems to be beyond this one event, as there are articles on them for more general interest due to their social media ""fame"" for example: https://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-money-stokes-twins-earn-sponsored-posts-tiktok-instagram-2020-2"

Deletion of The Stokes twins

WP:RS

Wikipedia:Reliable sources

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Lutheran Church (Ellington, Connecticut)

User:Bearian

16:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

delete

or merge - I can't find anything useful from |reliable sources after making a concerted effort to find such sources online. The only relevant references talk about it in context of the historic area of Ellington, Connecticut

Deletion of First Lutheran Church (Ellington, Connecticut)

WP:RS

Wikipedia:Reliable sources

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missing Iranian oil rig

User:Horse

17:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

keep

appears to satisfy , should be edited to be more about the crime (USD $87m is a significant fraud by any standard) with the political scandal that resulted from the crime being secondary

Deletion of Missing Iranian oil rig

WP:NCRIME

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyrgyzstan at the 2016 Asian Beach Games

User:Comatmebro

16:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

delete

Could not locate third-party coverage of this specific country in the Asia Beach games. Per nom, fails and should be deleted

Deletion of Kyrgyzstan at the 2016 Asian Beach Games

WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riyadh Shikawi

User:Sherurcij

19:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

delete

per the nom. The user's argument for keep is based on unsourced claims. They are not independantly |verifiable. The nom already tried to find sources and could not

Deletion of Riyadh Shikawi

WP:V

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFerry

User:Ivanvector

21:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

comment

do we consider the World Travel Awards to be major awards? I am leaning towards no, as I can find no significant coverage, and they don't have a Wikipedia page. Having reviewed the sources a third time, and trying to put aside the editor's COI and my preference for not |biting the newcomers, this is all I'm holding on to to demonstrate notability. '''Weak delete''' because I'm sensing in the forecast

Deletion of AFerry

WP:BITE||WP:SNOW

Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voltz

User:Edison

02:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

delete

Lacks the potential to be an encyclopedic article. Fails

Deletion of Voltz

WP:N

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noy Vanneth

User:onel5969

12:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

delete

Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass either or

Deletion of Noy Vanneth

WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Kage

User:71

12:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

delete

doesn't meet criteria for notability under or

Deletion of Ethan Kage

WP:PORNBIO||WP:BIO

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiddy bang

User:PMDrive1061

02:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

delete

under

Deletion of Chiddy bang

WP:BAND

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ the Redeemer selfie

User:Northamerica1000

22:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

comment

An would be to merge this to :Christ the Redeemer (statue

Deletion of Christ the Redeemer selfie

WP:ATD

Wikipedia:Deletion policy

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Thomas

User:SRX

20:20, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

delete

fails , , , , ,

Deletion of Kris Thomas

WP:ATHLETE||WP:N||WP:BLP||WP:REF||WP:V||WP:RS

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Adunka

User:GiantSnowman

12:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

delete

"fails as he hasn't yet played in a game. ""Local sports news"" isn't enough, as that fails both and . Oh, and saying ""leave him in case he plays"" violates "

Deletion of Roman Adunka

WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:CRYSTALBALL

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Brannan

User:SatyrTN

21:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

keep

"as he totally meets with significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Multiple attempts at engaging the subject about his article, including determining what he sees is ""wrong"" with it, have met with resistance and no further indication about what might actually need fixing"

Deletion of Jay Brannan

WP:BIO

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitt Romney Cranbrook incident

User:Shooterwalker

14:27, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

comment

"there has to be a better policy on incidents like this. Some of them don't deserve to be covered at all. And giving some of them their own article? That's a clear violation of weight. Not always. But just because there are enough sources that talk about some random political ""scandal"" to support a separate article, it doesn't mean there should always be a separate article. Such scandals need to require a certain threshold to be covered at all, let alone in a separate article. I might lean towards deleting or merging"

Deletion of Mitt Romney Cranbrook incident

WP:UNDUE

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derelict (Alien)

User:Dhartung

21:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

keep

as this is a key location in the series timeline, whether or not the footage actually appeared in the theatrical release of all the films or not, and central to discussions about who the aliens really are and whether the facehuggers and the space jockey are the same species (some believe the space jockey and the derelict were, like the ''Nostromo'', overcome by the aliens). In other words, this should be sourceable per

Deletion of Derelict (Alien)

WP:FICT

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian microlight aircraft competition

User:Spiderone

20:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

delete

fails , which is the only applicable guideline for something like this

Deletion of Indian microlight aircraft competition

WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illinois Fishing Records

User:WilliamJE

17:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

delete

It is a copyright violation. Everything in the article is copied from the website. If not considered a violation,

Deletion of Illinois Fishing Records

WP:NOTSTATS

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romeo Weds Heer

User:Atlantic306

11:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

keep

its a TV series not a film and has claims to pass as nationally broadcast so it should receive reviews, thanks

Deletion of Romeo Weds Heer

WP:TVSERIES

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MUD trees

User:Chaos5023

13:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

keep

This is a legitimate informational + navigational list article per , and Keegan's work (which I believe this article to be largely based on) is entirely valid, as demonstrated by its citations in dozens of other works

Deletion of MUD trees

WP:LISTPURP

Wikipedia:Manual of Style

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkwood Entertainment

User:Hahc21

01:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

keep

I have read the article and checked the reference and the topic is pretty notable. I don't clearly understand the nominator's rationale, since it has been covered by many reliable sources and seems (for a basic glance) to be important. Again, i must suggest the nominator to thoroughly read

Deletion of Parkwood Entertainment

WP:BEFORE

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrischanukkahwanzaamas

User:Davidpdx

11:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

delete

fails and nn

Deletion of Chrischanukkahwanzaamas

WP:NEO

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akbar Nikkhah

User:David

03:41, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

delete

The claim that his university gives him a title of distinction has failed verification, editing a predatory journal does not pass #C8, and he doesn't have high enough citations for C1. So what else is there? And if we kept the article we would probably have to explain issues like the predatory nature of the journals (or maybe also https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141312003411 this withdrawn paper depending on why it was withdrawn, if that information is available), not what the subject is likely to want

Deletion of Akbar Nikkhah

WP:PROF

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Zaghab

User:Daniel

17:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

delete

If we don't give any credence than how about . What ever the case may be with policy shifting the fundamentals stay the same: No sources then no article

Deletion of Al Zaghab

WP:ATT||WP:V

Wikipedia:Attribution

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futurion Power Systems

User:Slakr

22:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

comment

Hmm... now it's also starting to read like #G11|blatant advertising

Deletion of Futurion Power Systems

WP:CSD

Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Burras

User:David

04:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

delete

He seems to be an asset to his university, but that's different from being notable here. The http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=7NttDlIAAAAJ citation record isn't strong enough to convince me of a pass of #C1 and what else is there

Deletion of Lee Burras

WP:PROF

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle Bennett

User:Transcendence

21:07, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

delete

Fails . No significant roles, large fanbase or significant contribution that I could find

Deletion of Gabrielle Bennett

WP:ENT

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Knight

User:Cbl62

16:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

keep

WP:NCOLLATH is an inclusive guideline, not an exclusive one. College athletes may also qualify under , and Knight does so. He was (and may again be in 2015) Oklahoma's starting QB. He led the Sooners to an upset victory over undefeated Alabama in the 2014 Sugar Bowl and broke the Sugar Bowl passing record. He has been the subject of extensive and significant coverage in the mainstream media. Some examples are cited in the article, and see also http://www.nola.com/sugarbowl/index.ssf/2014/01/oklahoma_quarterback_trevor_kn.html The Times-Picayune, http://www.ncaa.com/news/football/article/2014-08-27/oklahomas-trevor-knight-facing-hype-great-expectations-season ncaa.com-Ft. Worth Star-Telegram, http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/02/oklahoma-qb-trevor-knight-katy-perry USA Today piece, http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/eye-on-college-football/24807303/trevor-knights-injury-was-diagnosed-as-transient-quadriplegia CBS Sports, http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/os-russell-bowl-news-1230-20141229-story.html Orlando Sentinel, http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-trevor-knight-katy-perry-20141007-story.html LA Times, http://theadvocate.com/sports/7997314-32/sooners-pick-trevor-knight-over The Advocate, etc

Deletion of Trevor Knight

WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxime Crochemore

User:David

04:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

keep

His many highly cited publications (14 with over 100 citations each in Google scholar) give him a clear pass of #C1. And the honorary doctorate and festschrift, although not definitive, are highly suggestive of notability, and they also provide non-trivial coverage about the subject, already cited in the article (falsifying the nominator's claim that the sources are all non-independent). Also note that holding a named chair is in no wise a requirement for having a Wikipedia article

Deletion of Maxime Crochemore

WP:PROF

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of golf courses in Portugal

User:SL93

21:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

keep

Passes

Deletion of List of golf courses in Portugal

WP:DIRECTORY

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Nyarko

User:Angelo

08:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

delete

he definitely fails . Of the given sources, two of them cannot be considered as valid, since they do not cover the subject in detail, but are merely a commentary about football events, and the other two have a debatable reliability. In addition, guidelines are considered as being both inclusive and exclusive

Deletion of Patrick Nyarko

WP:ATHLETE

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kholvad House

User:Sandstein

19:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

delete

per . Likely notable, but would need rewrite from scratch, as the confusing and essay-like content is worse than no article

Deletion of Kholvad House

WP:TNT

Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garcia Bros.

User:Comatmebro

03:25, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

delete

Per . Not enough third-party coverage of the subject

Deletion of Garcia Bros.

WP:ARTIST

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukichi Chuganji (2nd nomination)

User:Ollie231213

00:06, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

keep

He was the oldest man in the world out of several billion and one of the oldest men of all time. Coverage in sources exist. Passes . Why is being vehemently applied to longevity articles, but not others? Just because you don't find the information interesting doesn't mean it isn't of interest to others

Deletion of Yukichi Chuganji (2nd nomination)

WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phonebook (Film)

User:Ferdiaob

06:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

keep

I think this article deserves more then 26 hours to mature to be honest. Although there is definatly definitely no feature films by that name, so it will have a hard time meeting otability

Deletion of Phonebook (Film)

WP:N

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narasimharao Pet

User:NitinMlk

22:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

comment

According to the 2011 Census of India|latest census of India, the above place is a slum with a population of 930 1433, as one can verify from the page no. 856 860 of http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2815_PART_A_DCHB_WEST%20GODAVARI.pdf this district census handbook, which was published by the government of India. But slums are illegal encroachments in India, thereby fail

Deletion of Narasimharao Pet

WP:GEOLAND

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Moriarty

User:Bearcat

18:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

delete

Ashland KY is nowhere near large enough to hand its mayors an automatic free pass over #2 just for existing, but the article is not sourced anywhere close to well enough to actually get him over the bar

Deletion of Patrick Moriarty

WP:NPOL

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmable beverage

User:Satori

21:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

delete

Does not provide reliable, reputable sources per , and I could not locate any. Does not meet notability requirements of #Recommendations for products and services

Deletion of Programmable beverage

WP:V||WP:CORP

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rezaul Karim Mazumder

User:Jbhunley

16:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

delete

"Fails and . I was going to AfD this when I saw it come up again yesterday. The article promotional in tone and the sources are either by him or trivial. It is also a ''""one-edit-wonder""'' so I suspect we are dealing with undisclosed paid editing here as well"

Deletion of Rezaul Karim Mazumder

WP:NPROF||WP:GNG

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodleigh School, North Yorkshire

User:Dahliarose

15:36, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

keep

This is a useful article which is encyclopaedic, written from a |neutral point of view and backed up by |reliable sources. It therefore clearly complies with the Help:Five pillars|Five Pillars, the only community-agreed policies that really count. The school building itself appears to be of historic interest and is a listed building (see http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/Details/Default.aspx?id=328794). is a guideline not a policy, but this article is also sufficiently well referenced to satisfy

Deletion of Woodleigh School, North Yorkshire

WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:N

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venice High School (Florida)

User:Proto

12:05, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

keep

as per consensus at . Although note that does inherently imply that verifiability confers notability, which is not the case

Deletion of Venice High School (Florida)

WP:SCH

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.E.O.R.G.E

User:danntm

15:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

delete

fails

Deletion of G.E.O.R.G.E

WP:NFT

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle-earth armies and hosts

User:Zxcvbnm

20:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

delete

Extremely and list that fails . Belongs in Wikia, full stop

Deletion of Middle-earth armies and hosts

WP:INUNIVERSE||WP:OR||WP:LISTN

Wikipedia:Manual of Style

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Hawkins (2nd nomination)

User:XOR

15:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

keep

for unambiguously passing on multiple counts

Deletion of Aaron Hawkins (2nd nomination)

WP:PROF

Wikipedia:Notability

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bespoke portfolio

user:Andrew

22:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

keep

The topic is notable - see ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rkBR5eGWS8cC&pg=RA4-PR9 The Oxford Handbook of Credit Derivatives'', for example. The title of the page is reasonably consistent with and the claim that this is a mere dictionary definition is absurd

Deletion of Bespoke portfolio

WP:CONCISE

Wikipedia:Article titles