url
stringlengths
79
87
text
stringlengths
2
4.93k
language
stringclasses
30 values
start
float64
0
18.6k
end
float64
3
18.6k
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3372&end=3379
The case is remanded to the trial court for a full trial on the merits and in particular
english
3,372.84
3,378.04
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3378&end=3389
on this factual question that Kennedy has raised and already indicated his views on as to whether filters are less effective than the COPPA
english
3,378.04
3,388.8
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3390&end=3395
And Kennedy says the factual record doesn't really
english
3,390.12
3,394.16
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3397&end=3402
that he believes the filtering technology only gets better
english
3,397.84
3,401.36
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3403&end=3408
that the trial court is going to find that it's effective it's more effective
english
3,403.32
3,407.64
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3407&end=3416
than a statute would be and he says the government has not shown that the less
english
3,407.64
3,415.12
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3415&end=3420
restrictive alternatives that is the filtering technology should be just
english
3,415.12
3,419.68
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3419&end=3431
disregarded so he sends the case back to the trial court. There is also an opinion by, a concurring opinion by Justice Stevens, and Stevens is joined by Ginsburg.
english
3,419.68
3,431
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3431&end=3441
And Stevens writes to suggest that he believes COPPA is really extremely restrictive.
english
3,431
3,441
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3441&end=3444
Now, unlike Thomas, who thinks, ah, it's not really that restrictive,
english
3,441
3,444
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3445&end=3451
who thinks, well, it's pretty restrictive, in fact, there's less restrictive alternative,
english
3,445.06
3,450.42
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3450&end=3458
Stevens wants to say it's extremely restrictive. And in particular, again, see Stevens' concern
english
3,450.42
3,457.22
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3457&end=3468
here, he thinks setting up a criminal prosecution for speech is just a bad idea. He really doesn't like the Miller Test, if you
english
3,457.22
3,467.92
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3467&end=3476
kind of read between the lines here. Justice Breyer writes a dissent. Breyer is joined by,
english
3,467.92
3,475.52
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3476&end=3490
in his dissent, by Rehnquist and O'Connor. And Breyer wants to suggest that in fact the requirements in the statute are not that burdensome,
english
3,476.08
3,489.26
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3489&end=3497
and that on the record before the court, the court could decide that the filtering software
english
3,489.26
3,496.88
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3496&end=3503
is really not more effective and not less burdensome than the statute itself.
english
3,496.88
3,502.82
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3505&end=3509
that's really only a very modest burden on speech.
english
3,505.52
3,508.76
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3511&end=3515
to verify your, to have a credit card to buy the stuff.
english
3,511.62
3,514.92
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3518&end=3522
And he says, you know, it might be all well and good
english
3,518.36
3,521.72
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3521&end=3530
for the market to encourage individuals to adopt, to use filtering software, but that's not a that's not an alternative
english
3,521.72
3,529.04
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3529&end=3536
Legislative approach so notice Breyer is saying the least restrictive alternative means the least restrictive
english
3,529.78
3,535.8
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3536&end=3543
Government alternative not the least restrictive alternative that a private individual or the market
english
3,536.36
3,542.1
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3545&end=3553
interesting even jurisprudential difference there. And Pryor says he
english
3,545.24
3,552.28
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3552&end=3558
Pryor is not as sanguine about the filtering technology that's in existence
english
3,552.28
3,557.16
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3557&end=3562
either in 2004 or on the immediate horizon and he says filtering software
english
3,557.16
3,561.64
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3561&end=3567
doesn't really work that well. It underblocks, it costs the
english
3,561.64
3,566.2
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3566&end=3573
family to buy it and to use it, it doesn't work outside the home, it's not very precise.
english
3,566.2
3,572.88
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3572&end=3579
And I think most of us who, even now in 2015, are familiar with filtering software, if you
english
3,572.88
3,578.08
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3578&end=3591
have little kids in your family and you've tried to use some kind of parental controls, you know, that, you know, they may be better than nothing, but they really don't work very well.
english
3,578.08
3,590.12
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3591&end=3599
So Scalia says this kind of material actually could be banned entirely under the existing
english
3,591.92
3,598.36
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3598&end=3603
Supreme Court jurisprudence of Miller.
english
3,598.36
3,602.36
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3602&end=3607
And he thinks COPA's restrictions don't raise any constitutional concern at
english
3,602.36
3,606.56
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3607&end=3611
This is not, in his view, protected speech.
english
3,607.56
3,610.8
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3611&end=3616
Now, I did not give you—just because you had so much reading material already this
english
3,611.8
3,615.08
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3615&end=3621
week—I didn't give you the additional case in this saga, which is actually a Third
english
3,615.08
3,620.28
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3621&end=3627
So the case goes back to the district court, there's a trial on the merits,
english
3,621.28
3,626.96
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3626&end=3632
and after the trial on the merits, the district court, in accordance with the Supreme Court's
english
3,626.96
3,631.84
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3631&end=3639
decision, does in fact find that filtering software is a least restrictive alternative,
english
3,631.84
3,638.08
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3638&end=3643
that it can be effective, that it's likely to be more effective than the statute,
english
3,638.08
3,642.56
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3650&end=3656
The Third Circuit, in the district court, after the trial, the district court found
english
3,650.12
3,655.4
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3655&end=3664
that the alternatives, credit card verification, is very costly, that it results in lost traffic,
english
3,655.4
3,663.68
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3663&end=3667
that it's not very effective because a minor can get around that too by taking their parents'
english
3,663.68
3,667
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3668&end=3675
credit card. There's an interesting argument there about whether some kind of credit card verification is like
english
3,668.4
3,674.6
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3682&end=3688
some blinds or behind a red door or something like that.
english
3,682.42
3,687.6
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3687&end=3694
And he says that's not the same thing because you have to kind of have a credit card and
english
3,687.6
3,693.22
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3693&end=3699
pay to have access and relinquish your anonymity, which aren't things that you necessarily have
english
3,693.22
3,698.48
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3698&end=3706
to do in real space.
english
3,698.48
3,705.36
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3709&end=3717
this judgment, there's another petition for certiorari, and at this point the Supreme Court has seemed kind of exhausted of all this and denies cert.
english
3,709.6
3,716.84
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3723&end=3728
And there, you know, unlike the virtual child
english
3,723.2
3,727.28
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3727&end=3734
pornography where we saw the PROTECT Act, there has not been any other effort or any effort in
english
3,727.28
3,733.92
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3733&end=3739
Congress that's gotten anywhere. Congress has not passed any other legislation that's trying to
english
3,733.92
3,738.56
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3738&end=3748
restrict the access of minors to, you know, obscene material or other kinds of content on the Internet.
english
3,738.56
3,747.36
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3747&end=3751
So we can ask a few questions, and I'll kind of leave you with these questions, and we
english
3,747.36
3,750.8
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3750&end=3756
can take some of these up in class on Thursday.
english
3,750.8
3,755.04
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3755&end=3761
After the failure of the Communications Decency Act in COPPA, is there any way to construct
english
3,755.04
3,760.08
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3760&end=3766
a constitutionally valid statute that would or could restrict a child's access to obscene
english
3,760.08
3,766
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3766&end=3771
and indecent materials on the internet.
english
3,766
3,770.56
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3770&end=3780
Is the default solution adopted by the court, which is voluntary self-regulation, really
english
3,770.56
3,779.4
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3779&end=3788
the best solution as kind of adequate or inadequate as it is. I want you to think about for, as we
english
3,779.4
3,787.1
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3787&end=3792
think about next week and you start to do the readings for next week, and we
english
3,787.1
3,791.46
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3794&end=3802
talk about online harassment, cyber stalking, cyber speech that incites
english
3,794.34
3,801.82
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3801&end=3810
violence and terrorism, and cyber bullying, all of these are also very large,
english
3,801.82
3,809.36
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3810&end=3814
difficult social problems that we're facing today.
english
3,810
3,813.28
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3818&end=3823
But how do these rulings on these child pornography
english
3,818.96
3,822.04
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3822&end=3828
and child access statutes relate to all of these other
english
3,822.04
3,827.76
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3828&end=3834
Can we regulate harassment or cyber stalking or any kind of conduct online?
english
3,828.76
3,833.64
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3833&end=3840
Or is the internet so exceptional that things that we would ordinarily touch in the real
english
3,833.64
3,839.24
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3839&end=3844
world with criminal law, we can't touch in the cyber world?
english
3,839.24
3,844
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3844&end=3849
One other note I want to leave you with, there is again another statute and Supreme Court
english
3,844
3,848.56
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3848&end=3854
case that I didn't ask you to read because you had so much to read, but there is another
english
3,848.56
3,853.28
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3853&end=3857
statute called the Children's Internet Protection Act.
english
3,853.28
3,856.86
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3856&end=3870
This statute says that libraries and other places that receive government funding that have internet access are required
english
3,856.86
3,869.24
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3869&end=3874
to adopt filtering and blocking software.
english
3,869.24
3,873.16
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3873&end=3878
That statute also was challenged, and that challenge also went to the Supreme Court,
english
3,873.16
3,877.64
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3877&end=3883
but in that case the Supreme Court said that the statute was constitutional, that it wasn't
english
3,877.64
3,882.92
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3882&end=3887
an undue burden on the rights of freedom of
english
3,882.92
3,886.12
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3886&end=3891
speech or freedom of assembly to have a publicly funded library that has internet access to
english
3,886.12
3,890.88
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3890&end=3897
have to have some kind of filtering and verification kind of software.
english
3,890.88
3,896.64
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z96wLHMN62g?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=3896&end=3903
So that's our first piece of this, dealing with child pornography and protection of children
english
3,896.64
3,902.52
https://www.youtube.com/embed/sjZ3n88GYzU?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=13&end=17
3 முதல் 5 ஆண்டுகள் வரை சரித்தனை கிடைக்க வாய்ப்புள்ளது
tamil
13.44
16.68
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=0&end=7
Welcome, everyone.
english
0
6.6
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=6&end=12
My name is Priyana Rajan, and I'm the current director of the Franke Program in Science
english
6.6
11.32
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=12&end=18
I'm delighted to invite you all to this evening's wonderful event as part of our Distinguished
english
12.64
17.62
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=18&end=25
First, I would like to start by recognizing our benefactors, Mr. and Mrs. Richard and
english
18.62
24.42
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=25&end=30
their support of the Franke Program, Yale's flagship interdisciplinary
english
25.46
29.36
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=29&end=34
program, as well as multiple other initiatives at Yale that they support. So
english
29.36
33.58
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=33&end=39
I want to remind you that, as Ty mentioned, we have a wonderful reception
english
33.58
38.78
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=38&end=43
upstairs after the talk, so please do stay for that. It's in the student lounge
english
38.78
42.56
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=57&end=61
You consent to the use of your appearance, likeness,
english
57.36
60.48
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=60&end=64
and voice by Yale University for standard, non-profit,
english
60.48
63.7
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=77&end=81
Her research interests lie in 20th century US history,
english
77.28
81
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=84&end=91
She teaches a wide variety of extremely popular courses that focus on American politics, government,
english
84.88
90.84
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=92&end=98
Today she will be talking to us about her new book, G-Man, J. Edgar Hoover and the Making
english
92.56
97.76
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=100&end=105
This book has done incredibly well.
english
100.6
104.2
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=120&end=124
and Beverly, received the 2022 Bancroft Prize
english
120.56
123.8
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=123&end=128
in American History and was named a Best Book of 2022
english
123.8
127.74
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=127&end=132
by Washington Post in their list of 10 best books.
english
127.74
131.04
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=145&end=150
with this very complicated man all over again.
english
145.24
149.08
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YnFEIDvTvtc?modestbranding=1&loop=1&start=149&end=153
So the New Yorker in their 24 essential reads,
english
149.08
152.52