premise
stringlengths
923
1.41k
hypothesis
stringlengths
11
33
label
stringclasses
4 values
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Colin is wild.
neutral
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Colin is plucky.
entailment
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Lucy is not friendly.
entailment
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Claude is not clear.
contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Lucy is steep.
entailment
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Colin is not steep.
contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Kimball is not steep.
neutral
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Kimball is not friendly.
self_contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Marvin is not plucky.
self_contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Marvin is not naughty.
contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Peter is naughty.
entailment
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Lucy is plucky.
neutral
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Marvin is plucky.
self_contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Lucy is not clear.
contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Kimball is friendly.
self_contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Kimball is plucky.
contradiction
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Peter is not clear.
neutral
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Kimball is clear.
neutral
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Claude is not friendly.
entailment
Colin is plucky. Lucy is naughty. Peter is naughty. Colin is clear. Kimball is not plucky. Marvin is naughty. Claude is not friendly. Kimball is friendly. Claude is naughty. Colin is friendly. Marvin is friendly. Claude is not plucky.If there is someone who is either friendly or steep, then Claude is clear. If someone is not naughty, then he is both not friendly and steep. It can be concluded that Claude is wild once knowing that Colin is plucky and Lucy is friendly. Someone who is not steep is always not plucky. Someone is plucky if and only if he is not clear. All not clear people are not friendly. Someone is steep if and only if he is clear. Kerwin being clear implies that Kimball is steep. If there is at least one people who is clear, then Lucy is not naughty and Marvin is plucky. Kerwin being not friendly implies that Lucy is not naughty and Lucy is not plucky. If someone is both naughty and plucky, then he is not steep. Someone who is not plucky is always not friendly.
Colin is not friendly.
self_contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Jimmy is friendly.
self_contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Peter is not worried.
neutral
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Jimmy is not depressed.
contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Grayson is disobedient.
neutral
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Grayson is friendly.
contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Adrian is political.
entailment
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Abner is friendly.
self_contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Abner is not political.
entailment
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Peter is not political.
self_contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Jimmy is not disobedient.
contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Peter is not delightful.
entailment
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Abner is political.
contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Adrian is not disobedient.
neutral
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Peter is depressed.
self_contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Amery is not political.
entailment
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Abner is disobedient.
neutral
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Hannah is depressed.
contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Peter is not friendly.
self_contradiction
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Adrian is not friendly.
entailment
Adrian is not friendly. Grayson is not friendly. Peter is not disobedient. Adrian is political. Jimmy is not political. Amery is not political. Jimmy is not friendly. Hannah is not worried. Peter is not political. Abner is depressed. Peter is friendly. Amery is not depressed.If someone is not disobedient, then he is both friendly and not delightful. Someone who is both not depressed and not delightful is always disobedient. Abner being political is equivalent to Hannah being delightful and Jimmy being not worried. Someone is not friendly and depressed if and only if he is not political. Amery being not friendly implies that Jimmy is not worried. If Peter is political, then Jimmy is disobedient, and vice versa. If someone is friendly or he is depressed, then he is not political. If there is at least one people who is not disobedient or not worried, then Peter is not depressed. If there is someone who is disobedient, then Jimmy is not friendly. If Peter is not friendly, then Hannah is not depressed. Someone who is friendly and not disobedient is always political and depressed. If someone is not political or he is depressed, then he is friendly.
Abner is delightful.
neutral
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Hall is wooden.
contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Hall is frail.
neutral
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Sherlock is wooden.
entailment
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Humphrey is not light.
self_contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Anthony is not wooden.
self_contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Hall is whispering.
contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Anthony is not frail.
contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Anthony is wooden.
self_contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Humphrey is frail.
neutral
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Hall is not wooden.
entailment
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Vera is not light.
neutral
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Humphrey is wooden.
contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Kelsey is not whispering.
self_contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Kelsey is wooden.
contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Hall is light.
entailment
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Humphrey is light.
self_contradiction
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Hall is not whispering.
entailment
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Harley is wooden.
neutral
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Humphrey is misty.
entailment
Vera is not frail. Hall is not wooden. Anthony is not misty. Hall is not whispering. Harley is not healthy. Humphrey is misty. Anthony is frail. Anthony is wooden. Sherlock is wooden. Harley is whispering. Humphrey is not whispering. Kelsey is light.Humphrey being frail is equivalent to Hall being whispering. If someone is not light, then he is not wooden. Someone who is eithor light or frail is always not wooden. If Anthony is light, then Hall is wooden. If there is at least one people who is both not light and not misty, then Hall is not whispering. If there is someone who is not light, then Kelsey is whispering. If someone is both not wooden and misty, then he is not light. It can be concluded that Sherlock is frail once knowing that Kelsey is light and Anthony is misty. if there is at least one people who is not misty and frail, then Harley is healthy and Kelsey is not wooden. Humphrey being not frail implies that Hall is not misty. Someone is light if and only if he is not whispering. Sherlock being wooden is equivalent to Kelsey being not whispering.
Sherlock is not light.
neutral
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Culver is desperate.
neutral
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Travis is panicky.
contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Mila is skinny.
entailment
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Channing is not panicky.
self_contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Quinlan is green.
contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Channing is desperate.
self_contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Channing is not green.
neutral
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Quinlan is not depressed.
neutral
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Travis is skinny.
self_contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Culver is not depressed.
entailment
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Harris is not panicky.
neutral
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Irvin is not green.
self_contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Travis is not depressed.
contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Culver is not every.
self_contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Harris is not every.
contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Travis is green.
contradiction
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Travis is not every.
entailment
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Mila is not panicky.
entailment
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Quinlan is every.
entailment
Travis is depressed. Quinlan is every. Travis is not skinny. Culver is not depressed. Channing is desperate. Irvin is green. Travis is not panicky. Irvin is not panicky. Channing is panicky. Mila is not depressed. Culver is every. Quinlan is not green.Mila being skinny or Culver being not panicky implies that Irvin is not green. Channing being not desperate is equivalent to Travis being not skinny. Quinlan being not green is equivalent to Travis being desperate. If Channing is not desperate, then Travis is not green, and vice versa. If someone is both not every and not skinny, then he is not panicky. It can be concluded that Culver is not every once knowing that Channing is not skinny and Culver is panicky. If someone is not every, then he is skinny, and vice versa. If there is someone who is not panicky, then Harris is every. Someone who is eithor not desperate or not depressed is always not panicky. If there is someone who is either not desperate or not depressed, then Quinlan is not green and Quinlan is panicky. Harris is not green if and only if Irvin is every and Mila is not depressed. Someone who is eithor desperate or not panicky is always not every.
Quinlan is not desperate.
neutral
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Jerry is not round.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Hamlin is not fine.
contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Jimmy is round.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Jimmy is not fine.
entailment
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Braden is not naughty.
contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Hamlin is fine.
entailment
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Morris is not naughty.
neutral
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Morris is magnificent.
entailment
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Jimmy is fine.
contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Hamlin is not naughty.
neutral
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Chandler is fine.
contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Chandler is not naughty.
neutral
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Jerry is determined.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Morris is round.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Chandler is round.
neutral
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Hamlin is not typical.
entailment
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Alston is not typical.
contradiction
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Chandler is not magnificent.
entailment
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Alston is naughty.
neutral
Jerry is not round. Chandler is not magnificent. Jimmy is not round. Chandler is not fine. Braden is naughty. Hamlin is not typical. Jerry is not determined. Jerry is not fine. Morris is not determined. Hamlin is fine. Morris is not typical. Morris is not round.Alston being naughty is equivalent to Alston being fine. Someone who is eithor not round or not naughty is always magnificent. It can be concluded that Jerry is fine and Braden is not determined once knowing that Braden is not round. Morris is fine if and only if Jimmy is not naughty. Someone being magnificent is equivalent to being round. Chandler is round if and only if Jimmy is not typical and Jerry is fine. If Hamlin is not typical or Chandler is fine, then Jimmy is round. If there is at least one people who is both not magnificent and not round, then Morris is typical. As long as someone is not round, he is not fine and determined. If Jimmy is not typical, then Chandler is not round and Braden is magnificent. If there is at least one people who is round, then Alston is typical. It can be concluded that Jerry is round once knowing that Chandler is not fine and Hamlin is not naughty.
Jerry is not determined.
self_contradiction