premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Calvin is not ancient. | contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Carter is not chestnut. | contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Calvin is not ugliest. | entailment |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Boris is not sufficient. | contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Carter is not helpful. | contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Calvin is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Boris is ancient. | entailment |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Rosie is not helpful. | neutral |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Rosie is not ugliest. | entailment |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Boris is ugliest. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Alton is sufficient. | neutral |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Brian is helpful. | entailment |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Rosie is visible. | entailment |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Irvin is ugliest. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Calvin is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Carter is ugliest. | neutral |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Rosie is not ancient. | contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Brian is not ugliest. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Boris is helpful. | neutral |
Calvin is helpful.
Carter is not sufficient.
Brian is ugliest.
Irvin is ugliest.
Brian is helpful.
Carter is chestnut.
Boris is chestnut.
Rosie is visible.
Carter is helpful.
Irvin is visible.
Rosie is ancient.
Calvin is ancient.If there is at least one people who is not chestnut or not helpful, then Calvin is not sufficient.
Carter being not helpful implies that Irvin is not ugliest.
Irvin being not sufficient and Irvin being ancient imply that Calvin is helpful.
Rosie being visible is equivalent to Calvin being not chestnut and Boris being sufficient.
If someone who is visible is also not helpful, then he is not ugliest.
If there is someone who is either sufficient or ancient, then Brian is helpful.
If Irvin is sufficient, then Boris is not helpful and Irvin is chestnut, and vice versa.
If everyone is not helpful or not sufficient, then Irvin is chestnut.
If someone is sufficient, then he is both ancient and ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient, then Brian is ancient.
Someone is not helpful and visible if and only if he is ancient and not sufficient.
If someone is ancient or visible, then he is not ugliest. | Alton is chestnut. | neutral |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Rory is agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Rory is determined. | contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Rory is not puzzled. | contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Rory is puzzled. | entailment |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Homer is not traditional. | entailment |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Homer is not determined. | entailment |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Marion is not discreet. | neutral |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Maddox is not agreeable. | contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Maddox is puzzled. | neutral |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Maddox is not traditional. | entailment |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Hadwin is puzzled. | entailment |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Maddox is not discreet. | neutral |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Marion is determined. | neutral |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Homer is not puzzled. | contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Rory is not traditional. | self_contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Homer is agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Homer is not discreet. | contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Homer is not agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Hadwin is not discreet. | neutral |
Rory is puzzled.
Rory is traditional.
Rory is discreet.
Kyle is not discreet.
Homer is not agreeable.
Peter is not puzzled.
Hadwin is not agreeable.
Maddox is not determined.
Kyle is bad.
Peter is not agreeable.
Homer is not determined.
Homer is discreet.If someone is both not bad and agreeable, then he is not traditional.
If all people are bad or traditional, then Kyle is not determined.
If someone is discreet or he is not determined, then he is not traditional.
If everyone is determined, then Homer is agreeable.
If someone is not agreeable, then he is puzzled, and vice versa.
Someone being both not determined and agreeable is equivalent to being not traditional.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is not discreet once knowing that Maddox is not bad.
Someone who is traditional is always agreeable.
It can be concluded that Peter is not agreeable and Kyle is bad once knowing that Marion is not determined.
Peter being not traditional and Rory being not bad imply that Rory is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Marion is not puzzled once knowing that Rory is not traditional or Peter is agreeable.
It can be concluded that Kyle is not traditional once knowing that Peter is not discreet or Maddox is not puzzled. | Peter is puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Stuart is not tremendous. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Stuart is not puzzled. | neutral |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Brooke is tremendous. | entailment |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Lauren is tremendous. | entailment |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Stuart is ugly. | neutral |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Brooke is not massive. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Lauren is not tremendous. | contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Harlan is not tremendous. | contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Herbert is unusual. | neutral |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Herbert is not ugly. | neutral |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Brooke is bad. | entailment |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Lauren is massive. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Lauren is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Stuart is puzzled. | neutral |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Brooke is not bad. | contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Lucia is puzzled. | contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Brooke is not tremendous. | contradiction |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Brooke is not unusual. | entailment |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Lauren is not bad. | entailment |
Harlan is not bad.
Brooke is not puzzled.
Stuart is unusual.
Brooke is massive.
Lauren is unusual.
Lauren is not bad.
Herbert is bad.
Harlan is not ugly.
Lucia is not unusual.
Brooke is not unusual.
Lauren is tremendous.
Harlan is not unusual.If there is at least one people who is not massive, then Herbert is tremendous.
If someone is not puzzled and not massive, then he is not unusual, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not bad, he is ugly and unusual.
Someone is not unusual and massive if and only if he is ugly.
If someone is not tremendous or he is not unusual, then he is not massive.
If there is someone who is either unusual or not puzzled, then Herbert is massive.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly, then Herbert is tremendous.
If Chad is not massive, then Stuart is not tremendous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unusual, then Chad is not tremendous and Stuart is bad.
If there is someone who is both not massive and not tremendous, then Lauren is puzzled and Brooke is bad.
Herbert being not massive implies that Chad is ugly.
If someone is unusual or bad, then he is tremendous. | Harlan is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Connell is itchy. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Connell is not light. | entailment |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Sherlock is uptight. | neutral |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Culbert is not practical. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Claude is not lucky. | contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Claude is lucky. | entailment |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Alvin is lucky. | entailment |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Claude is inquisitive. | entailment |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Grant is itchy. | contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Culbert is inquisitive. | neutral |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Alvin is not inquisitive. | contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Claude is not practical. | neutral |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Claude is itchy. | contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Connell is lucky. | contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Rory is not light. | neutral |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Culbert is practical. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Connell is not uptight. | neutral |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Culbert is itchy. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Culbert is not itchy. | self_contradiction |
Sherlock is light.
Alvin is inquisitive.
Claude is not itchy.
Rory is itchy.
Alvin is uptight.
Connell is not lucky.
Culbert is practical.
Culbert is uptight.
Grant is uptight.
Grant is not itchy.
Connell is not itchy.
Culbert is not lucky.Someone who is not light or not inquisitive is always not itchy and not practical.
If there is at least one people who is not inquisitive, then Grant is not uptight.
If someone is itchy and not light, then he is not lucky, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Claude is light once knowing that Culbert is itchy.
Someone is inquisitive if and only if he is light.
If someone is not inquisitive, then he is both not uptight and light.
If someone is not uptight and not lucky, then he is both practical and light, and vice versa.
If Sherlock is not inquisitive, then Culbert is not itchy and Grant is lucky.
If there is someone who is both not practical and inquisitive, then Alvin is not itchy.
Claude being not inquisitive and Grant being not uptight imply that Rory is not lucky.
Someone is practical and not inquisitive if and only if he is not uptight and itchy.
Someone is lucky if and only if he is light. | Grant is uptight. | entailment |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Arvel is not attentive. | contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Hannah is lonely. | neutral |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Claude is not attentive. | neutral |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Hannah is not adorable. | entailment |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Michael is modern. | contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Hannah is miniscule. | contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Claude is miniscule. | entailment |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Arvel is modern. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Caldwell is attentive. | entailment |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Caldwell is miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Caldwell is modern. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Caldwell is not adorable. | entailment |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Claude is not miniscule. | contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Arvel is not miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Ryan is attentive. | entailment |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Michael is not attentive. | neutral |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Caldwell is lonely. | contradiction |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Arvel is not troubled. | neutral |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Claude is attentive. | neutral |
Hannah is not adorable.
Arvel is attentive.
Caldwell is attentive.
Arvel is modern.
Caldwell is not lonely.
Caldwell is not adorable.
Hannah is not miniscule.
Arvel is not adorable.
Michael is not modern.
Claude is not lonely.
Ryan is attentive.
Caldwell is modern.It can be concluded that Arvel is troubled once knowing that Claude is attentive and Hannah is modern.
Someone who is not miniscule and adorable is always modern and troubled.
Hannah being troubled is equivalent to Claude being attentive and Ryan being lonely.
If there is someone who is lonely, then Claude is attentive.
If Michael is not troubled, then Eunice is lonely and Michael is not miniscule.
If there is at least one people who is modern, then Caldwell is attentive.
Someone who is modern is always both not lonely and not miniscule.
Someone who is not lonely is always both miniscule and not modern.
Michael being troubled or Hannah being miniscule implies that Claude is modern.
If there is at least one people who is attentive or not troubled, then Arvel is not miniscule.
Ryan being not attentive is equivalent to Hannah being adorable and Arvel being lonely.
If there is someone who is either troubled or not modern, then Michael is adorable. | Arvel is not modern. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.