premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Rex is not glorious. | neutral |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Hadwin is not warm-hearted. | entailment |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Deborah is not quaint. | entailment |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Benton is not quaint. | contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Norris is mean. | neutral |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Rex is not mean. | neutral |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Benton is timid. | self_contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Benton is not dynamic. | entailment |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Lee is glorious. | self_contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Norris is not warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Deborah is warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Rex is not quaint. | neutral |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Deborah is not warm-hearted. | entailment |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Benton is glorious. | contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Benton is warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Hadwin is not quaint. | neutral |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Alton is warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Hadwin is not dynamic. | contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Lee is quaint. | self_contradiction |
Benton is warm-hearted.
Deborah is not quaint.
Deborah is not warm-hearted.
Hadwin is not warm-hearted.
Norris is warm-hearted.
Benton is not mean.
Hadwin is not glorious.
Benton is quaint.
Lee is quaint.
Lee is glorious.
Hadwin is dynamic.
Benton is timid.If Deborah is timid and Lee is not mean, then Lee is dynamic.
Someone is not timid if and only if he is not mean.
If Alton is not quaint, then Benton is glorious.
If someone is mean or he is dynamic, then he is not warm-hearted.
If someone who is mean is also not warm-hearted, then he is not timid.
Lee being not quaint is equivalent to Deborah being not warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Benton is not dynamic.
Someone who is quaint is always both not warm-hearted and not glorious.
If there is at least one people who is not quaint or mean, then Benton is not dynamic.
If there is someone who is not quaint, then Norris is dynamic and Alton is not warm-hearted.
Rex being not warm-hearted implies that Rex is mean.
If there is someone who is both timid and not mean, then Lee is not dynamic and Alton is glorious. | Hadwin is dynamic. | entailment |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Aubrey is not smiling. | entailment |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Gardner is not impossible. | self_contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Marlon is impossible. | entailment |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Gardner is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Marlon is smiling. | neutral |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Neil is not impossible. | entailment |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Aubrey is puny. | neutral |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Gardner is not puny. | self_contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Gardner is magnificent. | contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Neil is not tired. | neutral |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Gardner is puny. | self_contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Aubrey is not exciting. | contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Chatwin is not exciting. | entailment |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Chatwin is exciting. | contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Marlon is not impossible. | contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Neil is magnificent. | contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Aubrey is not impossible. | self_contradiction |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Aubrey is not puny. | neutral |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Marlon is not puny. | neutral |
Aubrey is impossible.
Gardner is not exciting.
Neil is not magnificent.
Brice is not impossible.
Aubrey is exciting.
Marlon is impossible.
Marlon is tired.
Gardner is impossible.
Brice is not puny.
Truman is not impossible.
Chatwin is not exciting.
Aubrey is not magnificent.Someone being both exciting and not impossible is equivalent to being not smiling.
If someone is not magnificent or he is not tired, then he is not impossible.
Someone who is not exciting is always smiling.
Someone who is both not puny and magnificent is always not impossible.
If someone is not tired, then he is both puny and smiling.
If there is someone who is exciting, then Aubrey is not smiling.
If someone is impossible and smiling, then he is both not magnificent and not tired, and vice versa.
Gardner being exciting or Truman being not tired implies that Aubrey is puny.
Someone being both tired and not puny is equivalent to being not exciting and impossible.
Someone who is not smiling is always exciting.
If Brice is puny, then Marlon is not impossible and Truman is not tired.
If Aubrey is exciting, then Neil is not magnificent and Truman is smiling. | Chatwin is smiling. | entailment |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Monique is easy. | neutral |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Mila is not shiny. | self_contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Robert is not discreet. | entailment |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Mila is shiny. | self_contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Burton is not shiny. | contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Mila is not curious. | self_contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Stewart is not cute. | contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Robert is not shiny. | self_contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Monique is cute. | entailment |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Mila is easy. | entailment |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Matthew is not discreet. | neutral |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Robert is safe. | neutral |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Carter is not easy. | neutral |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Carter is shiny. | entailment |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Mila is not easy. | contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Burton is not cute. | self_contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Carter is not shiny. | contradiction |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Burton is not curious. | entailment |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Matthew is shiny. | neutral |
Burton is shiny.
Stewart is shiny.
Robert is not discreet.
Carter is shiny.
Burton is cute.
Stewart is not discreet.
Mila is safe.
Robert is easy.
Stewart is easy.
Mila is easy.
Carter is safe.
Mila is not discreet.It can be concluded that Burton is cute once knowing that Burton is discreet or Monique is safe.
Someone is not curious if and only if he is cute.
If someone is cute and not discreet, then he is shiny, and vice versa.
If Burton is not cute, then Stewart is not shiny and Mila is safe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Matthew is safe once knowing that Carter is not curious and Burton is not easy.
If someone is both not discreet and cute, then he is shiny.
All not discreet people are shiny.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and safe, then Mila is not shiny.
If there is someone who is not curious, then Monique is shiny.
Stewart being safe or Mila being cute implies that Mila is curious.
Someone being both easy and not curious is equivalent to being not discreet and not shiny.
If there is someone who is not safe, then Burton is shiny. | Carter is not safe. | contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Mark is not sexual. | contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Mark is not crazy. | contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Hope is not sexual. | neutral |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Quade is not clear. | neutral |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Hope is not ashamed. | self_contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Quade is sexual. | neutral |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Ives is clear. | contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Mark is not steep. | self_contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Mark is steep. | self_contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Ives is not steep. | entailment |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Hope is careful. | contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Sidney is sexual. | neutral |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Quade is steep. | neutral |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Sidney is not crazy. | contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Ives is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Brian is sexual. | entailment |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Brian is not steep. | entailment |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Ives is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Hope is not steep. | entailment |
Mark is crazy.
Brian is sexual.
Sidney is not ashamed.
Hope is ashamed.
Mark is steep.
Sidney is not steep.
Ives is not ashamed.
Mark is not clear.
Mark is sexual.
Ives is crazy.
Mark is ashamed.
Sophie is not clear.If there is nobody who is not not sexual, then Quade is not steep and Hope is clear.
If Quade is not sexual, then Hope is not crazy and Quade is not ashamed.
Someone being not clear is equivalent to being not steep.
Someone is not ashamed if and only if he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not steep, then Hope is not clear and Quade is crazy.
Someone who is eithor sexual or not careful is always not steep.
If Mark is ashamed, then Ives is not crazy, and vice versa.
Someone is crazy and not ashamed if and only if he is not clear.
If someone is not steep, then he is both not clear and not ashamed.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Ives is not sexual and Quade is crazy.
It can be concluded that Ives is crazy once knowing that Ives is not sexual or Ives is not clear.
If Sidney is careful or Ives is ashamed, then Sidney is not clear. | Sidney is not clear. | entailment |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Quillan is not every. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Lucia is unusual. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Quillan is severe. | neutral |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Marshall is cloudy. | contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Quillan is every. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Lucia is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Rodney is not logical. | entailment |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Clifford is unusual. | entailment |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Marshall is not self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Rodney is every. | self_contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Reginald is cloudy. | neutral |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Rodney is self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Marshall is not cloudy. | entailment |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Quillan is not self-disciplined. | entailment |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Lucia is not severe. | neutral |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Lucia is every. | entailment |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Clifford is not every. | neutral |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Marshall is logical. | contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Lucia is logical. | contradiction |
Reginald is not every.
Rodney is not severe.
Gloria is not self-disciplined.
Quillan is not every.
Marshall is self-disciplined.
Marshall is severe.
Quillan is not self-disciplined.
Lucia is unusual.
Rodney is not self-disciplined.
Rodney is not every.
Reginald is not logical.
Quillan is not logical.If there is at least one people who is both not every and not self-disciplined, then Clifford is unusual.
If someone is not logical and self-disciplined, then he is both not unusual and severe, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Lucia is not cloudy once knowing that Reginald is logical or Clifford is unusual.
If there is at least one people who is not unusual, then Lucia is not self-disciplined.
If someone is self-disciplined or every, then he is not unusual.
If someone is logical or not unusual, then he is every.
Someone who is not self-disciplined is always not unusual.
If someone is every, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone who is unusual is also every, then he is cloudy.
If someone is not unusual or cloudy, then he is not logical.
Quillan is severe if and only if Quillan is not logical and Reginald is not cloudy.
If there is someone who is both logical and not every, then Reginald is not self-disciplined. | Clifford is self-disciplined. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits